Slashdot Mirror


AMD Announces New Low-End Processor Line

beaverbrother points out these articles at CoolTechZone and PC Magazine, writing "AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) is slated to launch a new Sempron line of processors this summer, to compete with Intel's Celeron line. The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing, and more advanced tasks, like playing video, with ease."

332 comments

  1. Sempron... by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Funny
    The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing, and more advanced tasks, like playing video, with ease."
    So... all tasks, with ease?
    1. Re:Sempron... by Rodrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, notice how they carefully left p0rn out.

    2. Re:Sempron... by psyco484 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All tasks not requiring screaming fast processors. This is not for servers or gamers, it's for the other 75% of the PC market.

    3. Re:Sempron... by ExTycho · · Score: 3, Funny

      or you could just use a old duron 1.3ghz and save yourself 100, for those extremely processor intensive word documents!

    4. Re:Sempron... by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, it seems that consumers are only able to keep track of one or two processor family names per manufacturer. Intel: Pentium/Celeron, Apple/Motorola: G4/G5, AMD: Athlon/Duron. Though the marketing people try hard, the Centrinos and Semperons are destined to become forgotten, no matter what their architectural/price advantages.

    5. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Any word processor that doesn't run well on modern cpu's is a piece of crap.

    6. Re:Sempron... by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you sure they left pr0n out of the semPRON?

    7. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's got a boil on his semprini then?

    8. Re:Sempron... by wahsapa · · Score: 0

      iraqi prison abuse scandle maybe?

    9. Re:Sempron... by mrjb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Absolutely sure -- semPron is Portuguese/Spanish -- 'sem' means 'without'

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    10. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't you rather call it a Simpson then every time your WinBlows machine crashes it would go
      D'OH!!!

    11. Re:Sempron... by nolife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Modded as funny but I have two computers with 1.4 Durons from Walmart ($199 a piece) and they work great. Mandrake and W2K. Both play full screen dixv and xvid videos with no problems and the gaming is not too bad (thats what the consoles and MY computer are for).

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    12. Re:Sempron... by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      it seems that consumers are only able to keep track of one or two processor family names per manufacturer.

      I suspect most consumers really don't have a clue about processor names, and will just go for whatever a salesperson points in their direction. Any ideas as to performance probably comes more from noticing the general naffness of a name than any actual understanding. Really, which would you rather have in the absence of any other knowledge, an Athlon or a Sempron? That, of course, is precisely why low end processors get names like this :)

      BTW, I'm under the impression Centrino is just a name for a mobile Celeron and on-board Intel WiFi NIC -- not quite a "processor family name".
    13. Re:Sempron... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Semper Aparatus.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    14. Re:Sempron... by NetGyver · · Score: 3, Funny

      It wouldn't be so damn bad if the new chip name had a ring to it.

      Take "Athlon" for example: The "Ath" part of the name reminds me of Athens, Greece. You know, home of the Roman empire, which was a powerful force in it's day. The "ion" part of it reminds me of the word "marathon" which says to me it can keep going and going. Kind of a powerful runner if you will...

      Now take "Duron", the "Dur" part reminds me of "endurance" whicn means it's not running for speed, it's an endurance runner. The "on" part still reminds me of marathons.

      These to me, seem like very fitting names. However, I'm not sure what to think of Sempron. Excluding the obvious porn reference, it does remind me of the Sampo Virus.though.

      --
      A Penny for my thoughts? Here's my two cents. I got ripped off!
    15. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Athens, Greece. You know, home of the Roman empire

      erm ... you sure ???

    16. Re:Sempron... by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't you mean "other 95%"? While I don't have any statistics, one out of four PCs being for serving or gaming sounds awfully high. That is unless you consider sharing folders to be serving, and fiddling with solitaire to be gaming. The vast majority of "PCs" are going to be workstations and desktops in business, which won't be servers and game boxes.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    17. Re:Sempron... by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the Roman Empire was from Athens, why did they name it after Rome?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Sempron... by freakmn · · Score: 1

      I know my family may be a little out of the ordinary, but of the 6 computers in our house, 4 are used primarily for gaming, 1 as a server, and 1 for the lady of the house to check e-mail.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    19. Re:Sempron... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You're right... but by most people's standards, these will be screaming fast processors! My Athlon 2500 is almost a year old and still feels screaming fast to me. It is fast compared to any of the other computers I am around.

      I think it's weird that when a budget processor comes out, people write it off as something that's OK if all you do is email and surf the net. Those very same snobs would be slobbering to have that processor just 18 months earlier. Have their needs really changed that much in those 18 months? Do they resign themselves only to email and web surfing once their computer is 18 months old?

      My point is that this thing will be cheap and screaming fast, and do everything effortlessly except for playing games that don't yet exist. Yet I'm sure that slimy salesmen at CompUSA will say that you shouldn't buy one unless what you do is just email and internet. Bah! I bet you when this comes out, it will be faster than what 90% of CompUSA employees run at home!

    20. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In my family we have 8 computers. 7 are used for looking up recipes on the internet.. and 1 is for the man of the house to play quake

    21. Re:Sempron... by krusadr · · Score: 1

      Athons - home of the Roman empire? Try ROME!

      --
      while sco {
      wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
      }
    22. Re:Sempron... by pknoll · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Very true, but consider - the CPU spec depends on what your servers are doing. I have one that runs my firewall; it's a K6 266. Another runs DNS/DHCP and et cetera for my local LAN; it's a P-III 500, and that's likely overkill in both cases.

      Not all servers need screaming fast processors, either. So, AMD's market could be even larger than just -gamer.

    23. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me think of the Marines... like Semper Fi

    24. Re:Sempron... by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Duron is being phased out, to be replaced by Sempron. AMD will thus still only have two consumer CPU names, Athlon64/Sempron.

    25. Re:Sempron... by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Informative

      Likely overkill?
      Unless you have a gigabit pipe thats a lot of overkill.
      Both tasks could easily be done by a single 486.
      I have a 200Mhz pentium at my house doing the same and act as a fileserver too. The only reason its that fast is that I didn't have anything slower with an usb port (for the wlan interface)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    26. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that he isn't splitting hairs. Athens was never a powerful center of the Roman empire. It was a powerful city-state in Greek history, but it was never so central as Rome was for the Roman Empire.

      Really, I have no idea where you get your crazy history stories, but they make you look like a fool. Especially when you start getting into your retarded semiotic discusion.

      I won't even get into how much stupider the parent to this post makes you look.

    27. Re:Sempron... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      In my house we have 10 computers. 9 of them are clustered together to render Blender3d scenes and animations and the tenth one is used to keep the bathroom door shut (it's a Mac, and it belongs as close to the crapper as possible).

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    28. Re:Sempron... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      The "Ath" part of the name ... The "ion" part of it ...

      Yeah, now that I think about it, those Athions do have a pretty good name going for them ;)

    29. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how they didn't realize to make multiprocessor stuff with names like Triathlon and Decathlon..

      Sampo isn't really that bad a reference, but you should probably read Kalevala(*) rather than virlists to appeciate that;)
      *) roughly the finnish equivalent of Odysseia

    30. Re:Sempron... by yobbo · · Score: 1

      So basically it's just like the pentium 100, which... everyone probably still has stashed away in the garage?

    31. Re:Sempron... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      You know it's time to upgrade when people are making jokes about still being able to use a machine twice as fast as yours...

      Yes 700MHz is just fine for games...

    32. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They named it after Rome when they still had Rome as their capital. But Constantine the Great moved the capital away from Rome, and then they lost Rome to the barbarians. They tried to get it back for a while, but didn't have much success over there, so they just went on with the Romand Empire in Greece and Turkey. Other questions?

    33. Re:Sempron... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      My point is that this thing will be cheap and screaming fast, and do everything effortlessly except for playing games that don't yet exist
      Don't underestimate the hardware hunger of games. I have a similarly fast machine (P4, 2.4GHz, 1GByte dual channel RAM), and the space sim X2 needs all of its power to run smoothly.
      So will Doom3 and Half-Life2 when they finally come out. OK, these don't really exist yet, but it has been known for a while that they will eat LOTS of CPU performance

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    34. Re:Sempron... by shione · · Score: 1

      If its a year old then theres good chances its from a batch capable of doing 3200+ mhz. My 2500+ on an Abit NF7-s can. Runs blazing fast in games and CAD work. Give it a try if you have Nforce board. You may be able to squeeze even more performance out of that machine you love. :)

    35. Re:Sempron... by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Do they resign themselves only to email and web surfing once their computer is 18 months old?"

      Absolutely not. We buy a new CPU and graphics card long before those 18 months have passed.

      Now if only ATI would get off their asses and actually bring the X800 XT Platinum Edition to the market, I wouldn't have to make do with this 7 month old 9800 XT. Lemme tell you, this thing _crawls_ in 1600x1200x32 with 6x FSAA and 16x Aniso in some games. Not "games which don't even exxist", but actual games available here and now. It sometimes even dips lower than 60 fps ;)

      And don't even get me started on AMD's 939 pin socket. They've been talking and talking about it for months. Why can't I buy a 939 pin CPU and mobo already? I already have the paired Crucial RAM and Zalman copper heatsink for it. Geesh, I mean, this socket 754 AMD 64 3200+ is, what? Almost 8 months old ;)

      Well, sort of "ha ha, only serious." I _will_ buy a new A64 and an X800 XT, but I'm not really _that_ angry and impatient as the above paragraphs sound. I can wait another month, if needed :)

      Does it make economic sense? Absolutely not. Is it what 90% of the PC market is all about? Absolutely not. Is it stupid? Absolutely.

      But, hey, it doesn't make it any less real.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    36. Re:Sempron... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Well, except the "Intermediate" tasks, which they omitted. If you ask me, playing video isn't such an "advanced task" though -- rendering it, yeah, but playing it back? Isn't that more of a GPU task?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    37. Re:Sempron... by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

      Nah - marketing misunderstood it was supposed to be Sim:pr0n - the X-rated vesion of the Sims we've been expecting. Since this is a low-end chip it left out the parental control registers.

    38. Re:Sempron... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      No, most GPU's will only do part of it, like scaling the image or something. XVideo does this for linux. Most of the decompression is done in the CPU with whatever codec you are using. Divx/xvid is more complex than MPEG-1/2, so it requires a faster machine to keep up.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    39. Re:Sempron... by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      IMHO, the only buyers of this kind of hardware will be corporates, for the desktops. even 2 years old hardware is probably overkill in this case right now, so it is sensible to give bulk buyers what they need, and nothing more. After all, if you buy 25 boxes at a time, you can always throw a monster in (Athlon FX-53, anyone?).

      individual buyers are a different matter. I want to keep a box going as long as possible, so it must be expandable and reasonably current; in three years, I want to buy today's games for 5 bucks apiece, and be able to run them.

      It is like buying a station wagon. you use it as such 4-5 times a year, but you do not want to hire one each time.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    40. Re:Sempron... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      I'm working on a solution to this.

      My next generation email program will render your email using the unreal engine. You will then be forced to fight your computer for the right to not get virus's.

      I think this is the future of desktop applications.

    41. Re:Sempron... by Umbriel · · Score: 1

      Portuguese/Spanish? Where did you learn languajes, if you ever bothered? In spanish 'without' is written as 'sin', not too near (1 letter right and 2 wrong)

    42. Re:Sempron... by matt_morgan · · Score: 1

      "Always On"?

      Siempre means "always" in Spanish, and I'm pretty sure it comes from a similar latin root (as in "Semper Fi," "always faithful." "Always" can mean "always works," as opposed to "always powered on." In other words, you can use it for anything.

      Of course that's only true for most people. I agree it's not nearly as good a name as Athlon or Duron.

    43. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunatly games will run on them just fine so that game companies can actually make a profit.. which begs the question "why get an expensive CPU if all my games run on this cheap one?"

    44. Re:Sempron... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I run a P233MMX as my primary box.

      (I'm awaiting a box from my school to hit the dumpster, and then I'm adding hard drives ;-)

    45. Re:Sempron... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoever convinced people that being a "server" meant that it needed to be big, fast, and expensive was a marketing genius. In reality though, most servers don't need to be big, fast, or expensive. Sure, there are people with multi-terabyte databases with thousands of users, or file servers for 10,000 employee companies, but for every one of those there are 100 machines that serve a low traffic website, or handle e-mail for less than 1000 people. Why run an 80 watt $600 processor at 90% idle for those tasks? If you ask me, these low end processors are *perfect* for that kind of stuff.

      I just finished swapping out 3 dual P3 Xeon machines that were running 4 websites and e-mail for 6 domains with an Athlon XP-M (yes, the mobile version) 2400+ with a PowerNow compliant chipset. Not only is it sufficient, but since it's still not under heavy load it spends most of the time at 800mhz, and total power usage is down from 620 watts to 130 watts. The whole system was less than $500 (not including the SCSI adapter and DLT drive I scavenged from the other servers).

      I'm the sysadmin for one company that is running their corporate network (file, mail and web servers) off a pair of Duron 700s. Their 100Mb network and 1.5Mb net connection are more of a bottleneck than the CPUs.

      Low end processors exceeded the performance requirements for the majority of servers years ago. It's really unfortunate that the prevailing attitude that servers need to be powerful causes people to waste money on the latest and greatest CPUs when it could be better spent on faster storage, or something else entirely.

    46. Re:Sempron... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ypu knw it's time to upgrade when people are making jokes about still being able to use a machine six times as fast as yours...

      Mine is a 233MHz Pentium MMX. I play UT:GOTY on it. (OK, I usually borrow the 2.0GHz Celery for that, but...)

    47. Re:Sempron... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Here are the lines:

      INTEL:
      SERVER:
      Itanium (High-end)
      Xeon (Low-end)
      DESKTOP:
      Pentium 4 EE (High-end)
      Pentium 4 (Mid-end)
      Celeron (Low-end)
      MOBILE:
      Pentium M (high-end) (Centrino CPU)
      Mobille Pentium 4, Pentium 4-M (mid-end, soon to be phased out in favor of Pentium M)
      Celeron (low-end, soon to be phased out in favor of Celeron M), Celeron M (low-end)

      AMD:
      SERVER:
      Opteron (high-end)
      Athlon MP (low-end, soon to be phased out in favor of Opteron)
      DESKTOP:
      Athlon 64 FX (high-end)
      Athlon 64 (mid-end)
      Athlon XP (low-end)
      Duron (bottom-end)
      Semptron (or whatever the heck it is, bottom-end, replacing Duron)
      MOBILE:
      Athlon 64 (high-end)
      Athlon XP (low-end)

    48. Re:Sempron... by dumbfounder · · Score: 1

      it is for servers when all you want is the best bang for the buck. it's like, would you rather have 100 crackwhores or just one high-priced hooker? ok, bad example...

    49. Re:Sempron... by rozz · · Score: 1
      ...Athens, Greece. You know, home of the Roman empire...

      i guess that's why americans want to rule the world - cause they know nothing about it !

      and you mister missed another marvelous chance to shut up ... together with all the so called moderators which put you up there

      --
      "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
    50. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Ath" part of the name reminds me of Athens, Greece. You know, home of the Roman empire, which was a powerful force in it's day.

      Now that others have had their fair share of poking you, here we go so you don't make the same mistake another time:

      Rome, the home of Roman empire, is the same Rome that is currently a capital of Italy. Italy is and was not a part of Greece.
      Second, later home of Eastern part of what was originally Roman empire was Constantinopole, now Istanbul in modern day Turkey, no Greece here either.

    51. Re:Sempron... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      My previous employer (a little tight for cash the last two years, that's also why it's my previous employer until six months ago, I do have a new one now)

      6 Workstations: P600/128Mb RAM/Windows'98
      (developement systems, compiling could take an hour, but otherwise fine machines)
      12 Desktops: P350-500/64Mb/win98
      (text/browsing/e-mail)

      1 Firewall 486dx-33/8Mb

      1 Main server P120/32Mb RAM /40 Gb harddisk doing:
      Samba (20 Gb share)
      CVS (about 4 Gb, several projects of 100.000+ LOC)
      MySQL server (with comercial licence) for customer administation,
      meeting scheduling, financial administration, billable hours administration, etc.(inhouse written applications)
      Webserver (Apache/PHP)
      Printer server

      It amazed me every day that this stuff was working especially the main server. Not much problems at all. We had one P4/WinXP/Win2000 system (Ghosted) to test our software on the kind of systems our clients were using...

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  2. Yes but... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will they overhead and melt down like the Celeron processors? Without this feature I doubt they will be able to effectively compete with the Celeron.

    1. Re:Yes but... by Professor+S.+Brown · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you meant over[b]heat[/b], then In a word, yes. I tried some last week, and they were absolutely abominable. All of mine were put to use integrating a Dirac pulse that was picked up by my satellite dish. Almost immediately they overheated, all the capacitors exploded and a diode changed direction and everything.

      --
      Shitram Brown, PhD
      Professor of Mathematics
    2. Re:Yes but... by Kenja · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Will they overhead and melt down like the Celeron processors? Without this feature I doubt they will be able to effectively compete with the Celeron."

      Given that, unlike AMD processors, Intel CPUs have a thermal regulator in them, I dont get the joke. I've seen Athlon chips barf their guts out across a motherboard when the heatsink fell off (plastic clip broke off in a tower), but a Celeron should just crash in that case or a P4 will just reduce its clock speed. In fact even the newer 64 bit AMD chips lack a thermal cut out on the chip, but at least (at LONG last) they have it on the motherboard.

      Note to the Jihad, I am not anti AMD or pro Intel. I like and use both, I just wish that AMD would spend more time on things like this and clock locking rather then pushing for higher speeds. Both platforms are "fast enough" for now.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you meant over[b]heat[/b]

      Slash isn't UBB, you know. [blah][/blah] should be reserved for mongoloids, and rightly so.

    4. Re:Yes but... by MoronGames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Standard Socket A boards (Athlon, Athlon XP, Duron) are also able to halt the system or produce an error noise once a certain temperature is reached. This applies to all nForce 2 chipsets, and KTxxx chipsets. I am unsure about others.

      --
      hey!
    5. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "fast enough"?

      You apparently don't do CAD or rendering or animation or FEA..... Processors today are far from "fast enough". People in these industries and several others will always want and need faster processors. Even when we hit something equivalent to a 10GHz processor will you not hear one of us proclaiming my computer is "too fast". I'll be able to get my job done faster, but I'll still be able to bring it to a crawl.

    6. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "...or produce an error noise..."

      Is that a sort of pop noise followed by crackling?

    7. Re:Yes but... by plj · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, system halting is good, but or produce error noice? If the heatsink has fallen completely off you've hardly started to hear that error beep when the CPU core has already permanently damaged.

      It'd be really interesting to know, what option applies in which case!

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    8. Re:Yes but... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact that the KT133 had no such feature. I dont know about newer ones since I gave up on VIA when it turned out that you couldn't use a SCSI card and a PS/2 mouse at the same time.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    9. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is initially a brand feature (I believe AMD designed it, and ASUS first came up with "CPU Overheat Protection" or "COP"). Other brands follow with the BIOS allowing you to set the temperature for immediate shutdown. I don't think it's a chipset feature though.

    10. Re:Yes but... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's typically a BIOS setting whether the system halts or just buzzes. Sometimes you can set one threshold for alarms, and another for shutoff.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Yes but... by mog007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actully the new line of Athlon 64's have a built in protection mechanism for just this sort of calamity. AMD learns from the past.

    12. Re:Yes but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Given that, unlike AMD processors, Intel CPUs have a thermal regulator in them, I dont get the joke. I've seen Athlon chips barf their guts out across a motherboard when the heatsink fell off (plastic clip broke off in a tower), but a Celeron should just crash in that case or a P4 will just reduce its clock speed. In fact even the newer 64 bit AMD chips lack a thermal cut out on the chip, but at least (at LONG last) they have it on the motherboard.

      I guess my AMD chip doesn't have a thermal regulator built in, either. But my CPU fan failed and my computer shut down without a problem. I don't know what 64 bit has to do with it. I have a 32 bit AMD chip. But the feature wasn't in the CPU anyway. It is in my motherboard. ASUS protects my CPU, so I don't have to have the CPU protect itself. As for "at long last" I have had my CPU protecting motherboard for about 2 years.

    13. Re:Yes but... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      The Athlon64/Opteron have built in thermal protection like the Pentium 4.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    14. Re:Yes but... by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, that's your Rice Krispies . . . but you forgot the snap ;)

    15. Re:Yes but... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      No mod points sorry.
      And lemme tell you untill my machine can do a realtime render with all the usefull options that is photographic quality on two montiors (different image each), it's no where near fast enough.
      Well maybe thats excessive, but since we'll get there and then some eventually why not dream now :)
      3dsmax 5 can bring an otherwise reasonable machine to a near halt on a fairly simple render as it is. I've got an amd 2200+ with 1/2 gig ram and a radeon 9600 based video card and I can choke it with less than 100k pollys, and this is just edit mode, not a real render.
      Fyi, I got into 3d moddeling AFTER I upgraded last, and will upgrade again soon so please don't think I'm to big an idiot. I really didn't expect to have this much fun at it, just wanted to try a couple things out of curiousity. (Now if I could just get a good upgrade on my talent I'd be all happy:)

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    16. Re:Yes but... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Well, system halting is good, but or produce error noice? If the heatsink has fallen completely off you've hardly started to hear that error beep when the CPU core has already permanently damaged.

      It'd be really interesting to know, what option applies in which case."

      I improperly installed the CPU cooler in a Shuttle SFF Athlon system (with an NForce2 chipset), and it refused to boot and blinked the "CPU" LED on the motherboard. No damage was done to the CPU, after removing the (defective) shim the CPU worked fine.

      The whole "thermal death" issue was really a farse. Since Athlon XP, there has been a thermal diode in the CPU. Implementing the $.25 circuit which monitors the diode and cuts the power was left to the motherboard manufacturer. Unfortunately, most manufacturers left the circuit off to save money. Fortunately, every modern board has thermal protection.

      Not to mention the fact that, with a properly installed heatsink (remember, 95% of the people with Athlon systems got them professionally assembled and tested by an OEM), the Athlon should *never* have such a problem. Trust me, it takes a lot more than a sudden shock to unseat the heatsink.

    17. Re:Yes but... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Given that, unlike AMD processors, Intel CPUs have a thermal regulator in them, I dont get the joke. I've seen Athlon chips barf their guts out across a motherboard when the heatsink fell off (plastic clip broke off in a tower), but a Celeron should just crash in that case or a P4 will just reduce its clock speed. In fact even the newer 64 bit AMD chips lack a thermal cut out on the chip, but at least (at LONG last) they have it on the motherboard."

      Sorry, you're wrong.

      All AMD CPUs since the Palomino (Athlon XP) have had a thermal diode *embedded in the CPU*. This includes the Athlon 64.

      Early Athlon XP boards lacked the functionality to cut power.

      "I just wish that AMD would spend more time on things like this and clock locking rather then pushing for higher speeds."

      Why? ALL modern AMD boards have the proper functionality and will shut down when the thermal solution fails. Why should they focus on fixing something which hasn't been broken since 2002?

    18. Re:Yes but... by feceus · · Score: 1

      The snap would come when something like this pulls the socket off :)

    19. Re:Yes but... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hey, update your FUD. The last Athlon that had the burn-up problem you describe was the 1400MHz... that's right, way back when they actually used the freqency as the model number. Now they just shut down.

      Since then, the Pentium4's have also been running considerably hotter than Athlons.

    20. Re:Yes but... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      No, it's a loud blaring sound that echos throughout the building. Often times, the authorities are also automatically called, just in case you're not there.

      It's a sophisticated wireless protocol using a chemical alarm designator carried by convective air currents to signal isotope-bearing detectors already pre-installed in most buildings.

    21. Re:Yes but... by Merovign · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Both platforms are "fast enough" for now."

      No matter how many times I read it, I don't get it.

    22. Re:Yes but... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Is that a sort of pop noise followed by crackling?

      I've always imagined the error noise being more of a sizzling sound.
      My PSU's error noise is a crackling sound, or sometimes just a click as the screen goes dead.

    23. Re:Yes but... by TwistedSpring · · Score: 1

      The Tom's Hardware video lies to you.

      1. Temperature sensor "Laser" indicator is not blinking when measuring temperatures of the Intel chips.
      2. Intel chips do contain temperature monitoring circuitry but this must be enabled. Most motherboards probably do not allow you to disable it. Both motherboards used by Toms Hardware for the Intel tests had CPU speed throttling capabilities, the motherboard used for the AMD tests did not have this capability.
      3. Intel's tech docs state: "In addition, a thermal solution [read: fan] that is significantly under-designed [read: removed by an idiot] may not be capable of cooling the processor even when the TCC is active continuously.", in other words, it'll still burn up.
      4. There are some very convenient edits in the Toms Hardware video, for instance a cut from intel board with a temperature probe above it to the same shot of the board but without the probe...
      5. On one test, the heatsink and fan are replaced but the fan is not turning, and the immediate speed increase seen in Q3 in the background leaves me particularly dubious.
      6. When heatsinks are removed, the Intel CPUs read just above room temperature. This is ludicrous for a 2ghz CPU running Q3 that has just had it's heatsink and fan removed. Especially when the heatsink has no thermal conductive grease on it
      7. In fact, neither of the Intel cpus have any grease or grease residue on the heatsink or chip. Forgetting this can make your heatsink as good as useless
      8. In the P4 video, why is the fan running when removed but not running when it is replaced? Why unplug the fan? Surely this would cause the system to notice a fan failure and shut down?
      9. Your motherboard has thermal protection. Turn it on. Sit back. Don't worry about this nonsense.
      What with Tom's Hardware's pro-intel stance of late, and this video that's done AMD so much damage by making everyone believe that Intel chips somehow better because they don't die when you remove the heatsink, I really don't trust them as an impartial resource.

      If you don't believe me, why not disable all the monitoring stuff in your BIOS and take the cooler off your Intel CPU? It'll do it no harm! It's protected: Tom's Hardware says it is. So do you really trust him?

    24. Re:Yes but... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      my mobo (asus - cant remember the model), there's a threshhold for the fan to go full (it runns at 60% otherwise), for quietness) and another for shutoff.

    25. Re:Yes but... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      your sig, incase you didn't know, is becuse the web server is ms IIS, running behind a linux firewall, proxy or NATbox, so every port other than 80 goes to the linux host.

    26. Re:Yes but... by neurojab · · Score: 1

      >Is that a sort of pop noise followed by crackling?

      Get it straight... it's snap, crackle, pop.

    27. Re:Yes but... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact that the KT133 had no such feature.

      It had (or at least most MB's had), but it was a BIOS feature and too slow to react to something like fallen off hs unlike the mobern mb's. But fine for failed fan, which is much more likely scenario anyway.

    28. Re:Yes but... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      That's my baby ;-)

      It helped a lot when the heating broke down last winter, kept the temperature at about 16 degrees Celsius while it was freezing outside...

      I'm not sure if the P4's are running a lot hotter as the Athlon-1400Mhz,
      but the AthlonXP and Athlon64 line are certainly cooler.

      Talking about older CPU's that are still quite capable of keeping up, my Athlon-1400Mhz is still a fine machine.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  3. are these really cheaper to produce? by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or are they just filling in a perceived niche? id buy these for sure if they are really cheaper than older durons are (really cheap)...

    1. Re:are these really cheaper to produce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "are these really cheaper to produce?"

      Yes because of higher yeilds and lower yeilds of highend processors. Less transistors than flagship products. More CPU's per sheet compared to flagship chips. The list goes on.

      "... are they just filling in a perceived niche?"

      Yes that too. AMD is not making hand over fist profits on their 64 bit chips.

      ping

  4. Duron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So it's like a Duron, but with an even sillier name?

    1. Re:Duron? by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      I wonder where the marketing "geniuses" get the ideas for these things. Isn't semper latin for always? Maybe this processor is meant to be "always on."

    2. Re:Duron? by Josh+Booth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sempron sounds rather hard for English (myself included) speakers to pronounce. They'll probably say "semperon" instead, which seems more reasonable anyway since semper is Latin for always. Or they could just be blunt and call it "AllwaysOnium"

    3. Re:Duron? by shokk · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they were going for something sounding like "Simple" to show that it wasn't meant to do much. Simpron would have been too dead a giveaway that you should not want this.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    4. Re:Duron? by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, in an effort for to promote "brand identity", and after the great success they had with their T-bird line, they're going to name it "Firefox".

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    5. Re:Duron? by pknoll · · Score: 1
      Just like a few people I know say "Ath-a-lon" instead of the correct, two-syllable "Ath-lon."

      I've never understood that.

    6. Re:Duron? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yes, finding a common word that has the same consonant combination as "sempron" would be...impressive.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    7. Re:Duron? by TechnoPops · · Score: 1

      I figure those people also pronounce the word "triathlon" as "tri-a-tha-lon".

      --
      "Each time you smile, it'll only last awhile. Life may be scary, but it's only temporary."
    8. Re:Duron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask them how many As are in "athlon". If they say anything other than 1 or 42, beat them over the head with a baseball bat. They should figure it out pretty quickly then.

    9. Re:Duron? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I suggested "Spankeron". Somehow I thought it'd win with the porn industry.

  5. Intel are watching you... by N3koFever · · Score: 0

    Is it coincidence that I got an Intel ad when I opened this story? I think not...

  6. soundalike by 7Ghent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, the marketing strategy is that the new chip name sounds so similar that people will get confused and buy a Sempron when they meant to buy a Celeron?

    Well, at least it sounds less like vegetable.

    1. Re:soundalike by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Celeron, uh, celery is good for you. Or did I mean Celeron? Well all I know is I have one of them in a tower and the other in the fridge.

      Sempron sounds like a drug that has those horrible side efects, like death, that are all on TV commercialls now. Zoloft, Nexium, Sempron.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:soundalike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe a Duron or an Athlon? Or Opteron?

      I think you're reading too far into this.

    3. Re:soundalike by jlp2097 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No.
      "semper" is latin for "always", "everytime", "ever".
      "durus" means "enduring", "hard".

      So the name suggests this being the successor of the Duron.

    4. Re:soundalike by 7Ghent · · Score: 3, Funny

      So then wouldn't "Sempron" make a better name for a Viagra-like drug?

    5. Re:soundalike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sempron? What the ..! I meant to buy some SimPorn!

    6. Re:soundalike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This implies that the Duron meant the "hard on."

    7. Re:soundalike by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      No, the term you're looking for is "semper durus phallus".

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:soundalike by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      No, it means they should've called their processor line Viagron. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:soundalike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Durus is also klingon for the killer of worf's father

  7. so... by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Big numbers on box with little actual performance, for people who want big numbers but don't really need a powerful computer(or have a clue, of course, if you're without a clue you don't really need a powerful computer so..)...

    if it's a celeron competitor that is..

    hopefully it'll be at least very affordable..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:so... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      I'd wager that when this comes out, it will be faster than what's in your primary home computer. Sorry. I'm just sick of people talking about how this won't be "powerful" only because it's got a smaller cache. The fact there will be faster chips does not somehow decrease this thing's performance.

      Just to put things in perspective: A car that's faster than 95% of all cars on the road couldn't be described as having "little actual performance." And this processor will be faster than 95% of all computers in use.

    2. Re:so... by coopaq · · Score: 1
      for people who want big numbers

      You mean like the GeForce MX4000 instead of MX440!

      That's Geforce MX FOUR THOUSAND!!! (not four hundred.)

    3. Re:so... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      so what? it should only be compared to things that are on SALE on that day this thing will be on sale, they themselfs say that the cheapo but with big numbers to make it seem like a good buy segment are what they're going for.

      I'd wager it'll be just as powerful as my primary computer is now. the catch is, that it's going to suck donkey balls compared to stuff that's for sale for 20$ higher price.

      if you think that new cheapo is always better than average priced well chosen item from a year back then you are dead wrong! haven't been keeping track on celerons or graphics cards? my gfx card is starting to be pretty old but they still sell gfx cards that are worse than it for the same price that I bought mine(the cards sold at that price range today have bigger numbers on them though, but it doesn't change the fact that they're slower).

      (of course, I'm talking about the radeon 8500 vs. 9200, I could just as well be talking about a year and a half old p4 vs celeron of today)

      cars make a very bad analogy here.. average consumer cars haven't gotten remarkably faster in decades..

      the fact that it's intended to be a cheapo consumer chip to be put into some brand name computers with big number and to be sold at supermarkets for clueless is what makes people say "it won't be as powerful".

      Sure, it might be at some time at a point where buying it actually makes sense, it makes sense sometimes to buy celerons and durons as well but that doesn't make them powerful.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:so... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Fine, some new, low-priced graphics cards are slower than old, expensive ones (8500 is a good example). But my point is that this in not the case with the Sempron. It will DEFINITELY be faster than my 2500, probably faster even than a P4 3GHz. In other words, really, really fast. To say it can "only" do so-and-so is stupid. The truth is, we haven't yet released a consumer application that this thing can't do incredibly well. I'm just trying to keep things in perspective.

  8. Whats with the -ron? by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Celeron, Duron, and now Sempron Am I missing something?

    1. Re:Whats with the -ron? by erucsbo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hidden performance problems that surface later - like Enron?, or is it just that when the heavy calculations need to be done, the high end chips will say "see you later on" while these low end ones stagger on.

    2. Re:Whats with the -ron? by flamelord · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sauron would work well.

      I want a Sauron processor.

    3. Re:Whats with the -ron? by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Am I the only one who thinks of celery every time I hear the name "celeron"? I don't have such an immediate word association with sempron, so I guess that's a good thing.

      -jim

    4. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't have such an immediate word association with sempron

      sempron. As in pr0n, the l33T way to spell porn.

    5. Re:Whats with the -ron? by shakparl · · Score: 0

      Next models:

      Enron - separate cache to onboard NICs, with hardcoded strong encryption for connections to DC lobbyist servers and whitehouse.gov, optimized for rapid electronic financial transactions. Unfortunately will obfuscate benchmark results.

      Elron - optimized for multi-threaded usenet postings to facilitate religious subcultures. Special feature with software frontend to store user and group names in separate cache with support for specialized algorithms to scan and parse any potential dissent or criticism towards stored users and groups. Upon positive identification, immediately forks all processor resources towards parsing legal databases for obscure lawsuit keywords to use against critics.

    6. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well.. semPRON.
      it's suited for video and images apparently.

      posted anon for fun.

    7. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Am I the only one who thinks of celery every time I hear the name "celeron"?

      I get it!!! Celeron == Celery!! AHA HA HA HA HAAA!!! That's a good one! I never heard of that before! You're sooooo inciteful! Gosh! I wish I had your cunning wit!

      Whew!!! Celer(y|on)... Man... What will you people think of next!

    8. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for the Asian customers... 'Athron'

    9. Re:Whats with the -ron? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      New from K-Tel! The Dadooron cpu.

      Brought it home on Monday and my heart stood still.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.
      Loaded up this OS from a guy named Bill.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.
      Whoa, my heart stood still.
      Yeah, an OS from Bill.
      And then I booted up my,
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.

      They knew what they were doin' when they caught my eye.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.
      A really nifty box and lots of pie in the sky.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron
      Yeah, they caught my eye,
      With all that pie in the sky.
      And when I booted up my,
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.

      But wait! Don't order yet. Call before midnight tonight and get a Moron XML4000 Ultra Plus with bluing for extra whiteness at no extra cost!

      KFG

    10. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's not a match, but for a while there they were all sounding like Marathon, and this sounds like an evolution of that.

    11. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Richard_L_James · · Score: 1
      Am I missing something?

      Yes... Da do Cele ron, Du ron, and now Semp ron

    12. Re:Whats with the -ron? by VistaBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if you translated Athlon from English to Japanese to English, you might get Athron...

    13. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Nothing can be cool unless its name ends with -ron

    14. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed Enron...

    15. Re:Whats with the -ron? by bstadil · · Score: 1
      It's to honor Reagan

      Next year we will see a relaunch of the Clipper chip under the moniker Gipper

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    16. Re:Whats with the -ron? by damballah · · Score: 1

      Same as pr0n

    17. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      There are sometimes that 5 points isn't high enough.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    18. Re:Whats with the -ron? by coopaq · · Score: 1
      Celeron, Duron, and now Sempron Am I missing something?

      It's an inside joke between the chip makers.

      These are the chips for morons.

    19. Re:Whats with the -ron? by corngrower · · Score: 1
      Celeron, Duron, and now Sempron Am I missing something?

      Yes, Moron.

    20. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow all this processor talk has given me a raging hardon

    21. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The engrish speaking people will also list Athlon here ;-)

    22. Re:Whats with the -ron? by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      I cannot allow this!

      -xSauronx

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    23. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Iron. (it's not from Intel).

      open4free ©

    24. Re:Whats with the -ron? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "I want a Sauron processor."

      Hot and firey with clouds of black smoke?

    25. Re:Whats with the -ron? by The+Creator · · Score: 1

      The want people to subliminibaly think about Rom Geremy.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    26. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sempron sounds nice enough, but...

      MY cpu is optimised for surfing pron on the 'net!

      That's right! Go on out and pick yourself up a Jeremy,Ron!

    27. Re:Whats with the -ron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sauron processor is currently the preferred choice for evil crackers. Ten out of ten evil crackers surveyed said they liked it.

      Sauron II, which is in the works now, will have quantum computing cryptographic functionality. Imagine a world with no secrets, where everybody's bank account belongs to the public domain. Muahahhaha!

  9. Bad name by ebcdic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel sure this will immediately be spelt "sempr0n".

    1. Re:Bad name by System.out.println() · · Score: 2, Funny

      In fact it already *has* been spelled sempr0n. Allow me to link you.

    2. Re:Bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of video did you think it plays with ease?

    3. Re:Bad name by mrjb · · Score: 1

      babelfish from portuguese to english: 'sem' say what you want but I don't think this is a very sexy CPU. Conspiracy theories are welcome from here on.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    4. Re:Bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be sold at the price of $69.69

  10. Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hm.Sempr0n.

    Sounds like something having to do with Marine porn.

  11. Whats up with these names?? by jamesdood · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean Sempron? Opteron, Xeon, maybe I would by a new processor when they come out with the Orgasmatron!

    --
    *narf!*
    1. Re:Whats up with these names?? by Hits_B · · Score: 1

      Sound like just another processor to avoid.

    2. Re:Whats up with these names?? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Funny
    3. Re:Whats up with these names?? by System.out.println() · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was bored, so I Googled.... and apparently, it's already copyrighted.

    4. Re:Whats up with these names?? by fembots · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should have introduced Megatron in '90s, if Transformers allows AMD to use that name; and eventually have Gigatron when they broke the GHz barrier.

    5. Re:Whats up with these names?? by jamesdood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually if I remember correctly, this is from a pretty funny Woody Allen movie, Sleeper

      --
      *narf!*
    6. Re:Whats up with these names?? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I mean Sempron? Opteron, Xeon, maybe I would by a new processor when they come out with the Orgasmatron!"

      I'm waiting for the Megatron myself.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    7. Re:Whats up with these names?? by XorNand · · Score: 1

      IP nitpicking here: That's a trademark not a copyright. If you wanted to create a CPU called 'Orgasmatron', you could since trademarks only apply to a specific line of products (I forget the legal terminology). It's why you can have both Apple computer and Apple records (Beatles' label).

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    8. Re:Whats up with these names?? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Woody Allen was a whole lot funnier before he was a child molester. I wonder which is correlation and which is causation. (Or if there is any link - both could be related to other events, I suppose.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Whats up with these names?? by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      Applied 10 to 20 minutes before sex, the company says the device's gentle, pulsating current brings its wearer to a state of sexual readiness, where the "slightest touch" can trigger an orgasm

      Women must be some slow systems to take up to 20 minutes to reach "steady-state". 5 minutes is an awfully long time constant.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    10. Re:Whats up with these names?? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      If you wanted to create a CPU called 'Orgasmatron', you could since trademarks only apply to a specific line of products

      Nevertheless, I doubt that you could get away naming a product "Orgasmatron", since AFAIK it was a word made up just for Woody Allen's movie. It has no generic meaning outside of the context of the film, and using it would imply that you had some kind of association with the producers of Sleeper, regardless of the product category.

      For the similar reasons, it is highly unlikely that you would be allowed to sell computers under the name "Viagra Systems" unless you did a deal with Pfizer.

    11. Re:Whats up with these names?? by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Screwing an 18-year old adult, even if you are old enough to draw social security, is not "child molestation". It might be bad taste, but it's not a crime.

      More importantly: what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom is NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    12. Re:Whats up with these names?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orgasmatron sounds like a porn star Transformer...

    13. Re:Whats up with these names?? by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      Apple's an odd example considering they sued over the sound chip in the IIgs (it was pretty sweet for the time), and are now sueing over ipod.

      Now I don't know anyone who can't tell the difference between a computer and a record, but I'm not a lawyer.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  12. I think what it implies is: by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What they're getting at is that its designed for basic functionality like your word-process and your basic video decoding.

    What this processor is probably not aimed at is high end video encoding/transcoding - 3D (openGL or DirectX) gaming or high-load server processing.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:I think what it implies is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Isn't gaming more GPU bound?

      (I agree with you on the other two though)

    2. Re:I think what it implies is: by vivek7006 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do video encoding using Duron 1.3 Ghz. I can rip and encode a whole DVD movie in about 4-6 Hrs. These new processors will be definetely faster than a Duron 1.3Ghz, which IMHO is fast enuf.

    3. Re:I think what it implies is: by brap999 · · Score: 1

      I run an Athlon 650, yes its really old, at least 4 years. I do full dvd in just over 2 hours. this is with ~354 megs of memory on Linux 2.6

  13. You've gotta admit by slycer9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That as much as we like to rip on 'choked' CPU's, Joe 6Pack doesn't NEED 1/2 the processing power that most of US use in our routers!

    Jesus Christ, my router/firewall alone is a 333PII, which, for the average luser is WAY more than enough.

    That said, I'm all for a new low-end CPU from AMD, let's me keep my overhead low and profits high. Good stuff, have some.

    --
    Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    1. Re:You've gotta admit by RobinH · · Score: 4, Funny

      my router/firewall alone is a 333PII, which, for the average luser is WAY more than enough.

      Well, a 333 P2 would choke on just half of the spyware that's installed on Joe 6 Pack's computer, so I doubt he'd be happy with the performance.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    2. Re:You've gotta admit by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The average "luser", as you like to refer to the overwhelming majority of PC users, wants to run an OS that they are familiar with and that's current. I'd like to see you run something more powerful/recent than, say, Windows 98 on a 333MHz Pentium II and see how much time you'd waste just looking at the hourglass.

      Oh, and newsflash for you: Joe Sixpack wants to do more on his PC nowadays than just word process and play solitaire.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:You've gotta admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add memory and a decent hard drive, and evn XP can be passable on a PII.

    4. Re:You've gotta admit by slycer9 · · Score: 1

      If you're waiting to see ME run something from the Windows line of software, you're in for a LONG wait.

      Granted WindowsXP won't run on a PII, or even on a PIII when you get right down to it. The conversation wasn't about how much processing power J6P needs to run the latest version of Windows, but how much power he needs to do what he wants.

      Which is download Pr0n, check e-mail & play Solitaire.
      Just because you perform tasks 1-3 on a WindowsXP box with 2GB RAM/250GB HD doesn't make you any more 1337, it means you're a moron who would use a Ferrari to drive across the street for smokes.

      --
      Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    5. Re:You've gotta admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win2K is usable on a 266ish P-II with 256M of RAM I have for a lab computer. It's no screaming demon, but it's pretty usable for simple stuff.

    6. Re:You've gotta admit by Xilope · · Score: 1

      I Dunno.. Windows XP runs perfectly well on my fiancee's PIII 600mhz system.

    7. Re:You've gotta admit by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      The conversation wasn't about how much processing power J6P needs to run the latest version of Windows, but how much power he needs to do what he wants.

      And what he wants to do is run Windows. Like it or not, that's the bottom line.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    8. Re:You've gotta admit by plj · · Score: 1

      Back in late 2001, I had no problems running Windows XP on a box with 450 MHz PIII and 448 MB of RAM. No performance problems whatsoever. Bootup was slow, but it was only due to slow disk.

      My mother is still running XP on her 600 MHz PIII with 256 MB of RAM and relatively fast HDD (one of the infamous DeathStars, btw. ;-) ). The system works quickly, and boots quickly too. But I'm administering it, so Gator and friends are not there eating CPU cycles...

      These systems are for sure little faster than 333 MHz PIIs, but I've also used XP on 233 MHz Pentium MMX, and although it felt a little sluggish I had a feeling that it was mostly due to insignificant amount of RAM (it was swapping rather lot, and really choke when you started to run multiple applications at the same time). Besides, they are still relatively slow ones comparing to todays >2 GHz boxes.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    9. Re:You've gotta admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used windows 2000 on a P2 300 up until 9 months ago. With 384 megs of RAM it was slow to start, but fine once it got going. You really don't need that much horsepower for web browsing, playing mp3s, word processing and handling even fairly monstrous spreadsheets. Compiling was a bit slow but *shrug*. And if you don't play anything but older games, that's not really a problem either...

    10. Re:You've gotta admit by Versa · · Score: 1

      I've got windows 2003 running on an old AMD K6 450 (underclocked to 300 for power conservation) right now. It runs fine. I use it as a fileserver.

    11. Re:You've gotta admit by CMonk · · Score: 1

      And it works great on my wife's AMD Duron 600. Could use a bit more than 384MB of RAM though.

    12. Re:You've gotta admit by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm running XP Home on a K6-300 with - are you ready for this? 96 MB of ram. Yeah. I hate my life.

    13. Re:You've gotta admit by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Joe Sixpack wants to do more on his PC nowadays than just word process and play solitaire.

      I still don't think any of those harsher uses really requires gigahertz computers.

      _I_ have found a PIIIM running at 866MHz with Windows 2000 more than adequate for most of my tasks. Actually, Windows98 was preinstalled on it, and it worked a lot more poorly than Win2K.

      Heck, my sister just bought a PII laptop with Windows XP on it and she's more than happy with it. Interestingly enough, it works fine with OpenOffice 1.1.1.

      Last year I had used a 500MHz PIII Xeon to make an amateur music video, and it worked just fine as a video editing system.

    14. Re:You've gotta admit by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ, my router/firewall alone is a 333PII, which, for the average luser is WAY more than enough.

      The '90s called... They want their cliche back. Get with the times. Joe six pack not only wants to browse the web and email, now he wants to edit digital video.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    15. Re:You've gotta admit by NetGyver · · Score: 1

      To the contrary, I've seen PII's run XP fairly decent, so long they have sufficient memory, HDD space, and only the minimum amount of programs running in the systray/background. Surfing the net, email, mp3s, document writing, are all very do-able. It won't be the fastest thing in the world but it would *definately* work.

      The conversation wasn't about how much processing power J6P needs to run the latest version of Windows, but how much power he needs to do what he wants"

      What if a customer *wants* to run Windows XP? I mean yeah, I get pissy when John Q. N00b wants me to put XP on his PII 300mhz PC, but mainly because I sure as hell wouldn't put XP on a system like that. To them though, it's like getting a new computer without actually buying a new computer. It's the latest new and flashy OS from Microsoft so they want it.

      I think the notion of "J6P is doing more with his/her PC nowadays" is fairly accurate. On average, most of our PC Repair/Sales customers do some sort of picture editing, scanning, casual gaming, and surfing the internet + email, and yeah, there was porn there at times too. A few were also in to home movie capping and whatnot as well.

      And yeah, I have an Athlon 2500+ with 1GB DDR, 180GB HDD, and WinXP I built a year ago. I mainly use it to write documents, surf the net, play music and watch videos. You may call me a "moron" or say I am wasting my "Ferrari" but understand that I didn't build this PC becuase i wanted to be cool and have a muscle machine to boast about. I think of it as an investment that will last me a while longer than a a low-end system. The power is there if I need it and I find that to be assuring.

      I think there are other people who feel this way as well.

      --
      A Penny for my thoughts? Here's my two cents. I got ripped off!
    16. Re:You've gotta admit by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What he thinks he wants to do is run Windows. He is wrong. He doesn't know he is wrong because he doesn't know shit about computers. What he really wants is to conveniently access and/or create certain types of content. You might say... experience them! h0 h0 h0. Seriously, Windows pretty much sucks. You may run it because that's where the applications are but people generally say shit like "I would like to run MacOSX" or "I want my computer to stop crashing", it's not "Windows is the greatest thing since oral sex" nor would that be a reasonable statement.

      Anyway he wants to do a lot of things he can only do on Windows or can most easily and cheaply do on Windows, so he does them there. He doesn't know or doesn't care that Windows is not technically superior to other operating systems. That's irrelevant to him. If you could just make all those buck fucker games run on Linux you could rope them in by the thousands.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:You've gotta admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and newsflash for you: Joe Sixpack wants to do more on his PC nowadays than just word process and play solitaire.

      And he fucking *hates* being called "Joe Sixpack".

    18. Re:You've gotta admit by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      If you'd drive across the street for smokes, whether or not you have a ferrari, can I be your only benefactor for your will in an early death?

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    19. Re:You've gotta admit by malfunct · · Score: 1
      XP ran fine on my 333mhz AMD K6-2 as soon as I got more than 64meg of ram in it. Not nearly as good as on my dual athlon 1900+ but when I go to my parents house (where the computer still lives and still runs windows XP) its usable to browse the net and write e-mail.

      I wouldn't start up office on the machine myself but it even seems to run that fast enough that my dad doesn't get pissed of at it.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    20. Re:You've gotta admit by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Actually, the average Joe wants to run Win98, cos thats what he knows, and not some new fangled, fancy-shmancy, hoity, toity ...

      A PII in a modded case is fine. Joe wouldn't know a processor from a corn plaster if he trod on it. Just be sure to change the date on the Bios.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    21. Re:You've gotta admit by juhaz · · Score: 1

      That as much as we like to rip on 'choked' CPU's

      We do? Really?

      More often than not, "choked" CPU's are only slightly slower than their hi-end counterparts and are nevertheless much slower. I much prefer good price/performance ratio to few percent speed increase.

      Joe Sixpacks, on the other hand, don't know what they need and fall prey to snake oil salesmen and Big Numbers -syndrome.

    22. Re:You've gotta admit by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      This is true. I've seen a friend's 1GHz Athlon brought nearly to it's knees by a moderately minor spyware infestation.
      I also fixed another computer for someone else which was virtually unuseable because of spyware and such (though also older, somewhere in the 500-800 MHz range, I think).

      Me, I like running my trusty old K6-2+ 450. It keeps me happy for most things (word processing, web browsing, modest audio/video editing, DVD playing, CD burning, etc.) It works because I keep it clean. And I haven't had to pay to upgrade it (aside from newer/bigger hard drives) in over 3 years.

      The major problem with people needing so much processor speed these days is because of all the junk that comes with everything that bogs everything down. I still run WinME on my main system, because I don't trust WinXP to be unbloated enough to run all my older hardware at a reasonable rate. Even WinME has it's own stability issues (because of being related to the Win9x line) that requires a complete reformat/reinstall every year or two of heavy use, but I am willing to accept the periodic inconvenience to have all my toys work the way I think they should to suit my needs.

      If Joe 6-pack knows what he's doing, older hardware will work perfectly fine for most things. However, the typical computer ignorance of most Joe's will necessitate the use of faste and faster hardware or have a very good friend/relative or local geek to assist them when they overstep their abilities.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  14. Why this new line? by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article says it's a 32-bit replacemnent for Duron to compete with Intel's Celeron at around 2.8GHz.

    So why don't they just lower Athlon's price enough to compete with Celeron? Or is this Sempron simply a rebranded Athlon, while Duron is a crippled Ahtlon?

    At first I thought AMD is introducing a dumped down 64-bit Athlon, that might be something, as the price of Athlon64 is still too expensive.

    1. Re:Why this new line? by kunudo · · Score: 1

      It's an athlon 64 with the 64-bit part disabled. Dumped down to 32-bit. Maybe someone will find the secret solder-point so you can mod it back to a 64-bit, but then again, I wouldn't solder on my cpu. ..

    2. Re:Why this new line? by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

      Likely this is a Socket A Baron-like chip where the modern high speed bartons/cripled clawhammers are moving to socket 754 while the Athlon 64s are moving up to socket 939 along with the FX-5x's moving down from socket 940 (and losing the ECC requirement). Thats what I gather from the roadmaps.

      Now if only I hadn't purchased my Athlon 64 back in December... oh well, my computer still kicks ass.

    3. Re:Why this new line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But a Duron 1.6GHz already kills a Celeron 2.6GHz?? Same applies for Duron 1.8GHz and Celeron 2.8GHz.

      Budget CPU Shootout: Clash of the 'rons
      http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i =1927

    4. Re:Why this new line? by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Athlon XP is already competing with Celeron. In the UK, a 2.8 GHz Celery will cost me 86. An Athlon 2800 XP (which as most of you will know will kick the Celery's arse until the cows come home) will cost you... 67!

      Both prices taken from aria.co.uk, there may be slight differences elsewhere. But as you can see, the superior Athlon is already undercuttnig the crappy Celeron. The point of the Sempron is to (hugely) undercut the Athlon in order to provide a chip that's cheap as... er... chips.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  15. I don't get this by batkid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Athlon XP line is actually very competitively priced against the celeron. For example the XP2500+ is $125.00 Canadian compared to the Celeron 2.6Ghz which is $120.00 Canadian. The only difference between the XP and the Celeron is that the XP is WAY faster in many areas (e.g. gaming). So is this new budget line going to decrease performance in order to "compete" with the celeron?

    1. Re:I don't get this by coene · · Score: 1

      AMD should be able to get a Sempron 2500+ (or whatever) to the $50-70 USD range - that goes a long way in the low-end OEM market.

    2. Re:I don't get this by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Looks like frys is selling an xp2500+ with motherboard for $65 US (If you happen to live in the Dallas area which I don't). Is there a market for processors cheaper than that?

      -jim

    3. Re:I don't get this by Caesar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The general idea isn't so much to compete with Intel in the North American market as much as it is to undercut them massively in Asia and Latin America. You may recall that AMD killed the Duron line in 2002 only to bring it back later for sales in China (sales that they consider to be strong, and also great for branding).

    4. Re:I don't get this by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not the "real" price, it's one of those limited quantity specials to get people in the door. The regular asking price of the XP 2500+ was, I believe, close to $90 for the retail version when I was there this weekend.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    5. Re:I don't get this by ameoba · · Score: 1

      The point of the Sempron is that AMD wants to move away from socket A. Having 4 distinct sockets on the market simultaniously (A, 754, 939, 940) doesn't really encourage OEMs to carry your hardware.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    6. Re:I don't get this by Raztus · · Score: 1

      According to the Anandtech review at http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927&p =2, even an Athlon XP 1700+ outperformes the Celeron 2.6Ghz in most tests, and the 1700+ is only $50 compared to the Celery at $90.

      What's this about needing a new processor to compete? Even the older Athlon XP's can take on the Celerons!

    7. Re:I don't get this by owlstead · · Score: 1

      More importantly, it is also way faster than the Celeron for Business applications.

      To reach businesses (and even consumers) things like low power levels, energy savings, temperature and low fan noise will probably be more important. As well as good support and deliveries and such.

      I just bought a Celery processor for my parents. Reason? It was more power than they ever need, cheap stable motherboard and a very silent fan. Now for that irritating old hard disk. Oh well, their ears are getting worse anyway - they say they can already not hear it.

      If they could make it a low power, 90mm, small die, good packaged fan, than I am all for it. Bundle a motherboard with audio, lan and usb 2.0 for all I care. And make it cheap as dirt.

    8. Re:I don't get this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a market for processors cheaper than that?

      Yes. I'd love to have a ~40MHz 486 motherboard with 32MB (or so) of RAM, an RS232 connection, a PCI slot (maybe), and maybe a USB connection...and I want it to be passively cooled, draw under 5W of power (not counting what the PCI card might do), and be about the same size as three CD cases stacked on top of one another. I doubt a setup like that would cost less than $100, IF it existed.

      P.S. Feel free to replace the crappy x86 architecture with something that doesn't suck to program in asm, maybe a MIPS.

    9. Re:I don't get this by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Actually, AMD saw fit at one time to revive the Duron because the Chinese and Indian markets showed a huge demand for CPUs under $50. I wonder if this is part of that program or not. I think it's a good way to salvage CPUs that couldn't make the "modern" speed ratings anyway.

    10. Re:I don't get this by nolife · · Score: 1

      That is cheap.

      Pricewatch
      lists the CPU alone for roughly $70.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    11. Re:I don't get this by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 1

      The three times I've gone in for one of these mobo/cpu combo's they've had them in stock (at the Sacramento store at least). They use cheap ECS motherboards, but they still work. Also, the $90 for the retail version comes with a fan -- this mobo/cpu combo doesn't, so add another $20-30 to it.

      --
      bananas like monkeys.
    12. Re:I don't get this by corngrower · · Score: 1

      I'ld be willing to bet that for OEM's, the cost of a moderate speed sempron processor would be below $40US, maybe even below $35.

    13. Re:I don't get this by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Yes. Embedded systems. The cheaper the better, and they really don't need that much cpu power. Especially if you custom make a nice embedded Gentoo for each of them, and optimise everything.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  16. Simpron by hirschma · · Score: 1, Funny

    AMD is just asking for abuse. See here.

    1. Re:Simpron by Spad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whereas by misreading the name of the processor, you're just begging for abuse...

  17. A processor optimized for downloading music ! by sufehmi · · Score: 4, Funny


    From PC Magazine's article :

    Basic computing is no longer just about e-mail, Web browsing or word processing. Today, it's also about downloading and playing music, as well as sending pictures to family and friends


    Yes !! Finally, they've created a processor optimized to downloading music. With Sempron, you can download MP3s 10x faster than using Celeron!

    Intel, eat my pants.

    Now I remember why I cancelled my subscription to PC Magazine years ago....

    1. Re:A processor optimized for downloading music ! by heckpart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This statement does not come from the PC Magazine. It is the original statement which you can also find in the press release from AMD...

      In fact you can simply find the real aim of AMD. They do not want to bring a new highend processor but an well performing "everybody" or "always computing" CPU.

      And finally... It is clear, that AMD offers its low cost users much more performance than intel does with its silly celeron line...

    2. Re:A processor optimized for downloading music ! by sufehmi · · Score: 1
      This statement does not come from the PC Magazine. It is the original statement which you can also find in the press release from AMD...


      I know... but any publications taking it so literally like that, even though it's very silly (a processor optimized for sending pictures??), should be punished.

      Erm.. whoops, it seems that I've just lost my self-control, have you seen him around ?

    3. Re:A processor optimized for downloading music ! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      naw, you cancelled your subscription because the darn thing was 80% ads and 20% superficial product comparisons. it is funny that I did all those things (email, music playing, etc. plus MISI) just fine on my 66Mhz 486 back in the day.

  18. I wonder if I should trademark the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOR-on processor before it's too late: the CPU optimized for AIM, flamewars, IRC, etc. etc. with a guarantee that you'll make the bash.org quote list in no time!

  19. Semprini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Semprini would have been better.

    1. Re:Semprini? by penginkun · · Score: 1

      Well, it's the plural form.

      And damn you for beating me to it, you bastard!

  20. Ob. Monty Python... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 4, Funny

    AMD annnounced today the new line of Semprini proc...

    (sounds of announcer being taken away...)

    Those responsible for this announcement have been sacked.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    1. Re:Ob. Monty Python... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's got a boil on his semprini then???

  21. Nothing new really... by djsmiley · · Score: 0

    "The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing, and more advanced tasks, like playing video, with ease."

    So a all round amd chip then?!

    Nothing supprising really about that. They did already announce it a few times, but i cannot be bothered to find linkz

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  22. Duron changed to the semperon by Grout58 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why did they change the name? People just getting sick of duron? Celeron never changed its name for as long as its been around.

  23. whoo hoo! by IloveMorphine · · Score: 0, Redundant

    holy shit! whoo hoo... optomized for downloading music and pr0n... this is excellent.... intel sux, BTW

  24. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I purchased a boxed XP 2500 w/ motherboard from Fry's this weekend for $69.00. The Athlons are already a better deal than the Celerons.

    1. Re:Why? by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      enjoy the shitty ecs motherboard that comes with the cpu.

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    2. Re:Why? by penginkun · · Score: 1

      mmm...inexpensive power...

      I *LOVE* my 2500+. I am so happy I didn't settle for a celeron or have to sell a kidney for a P4.

      Now if you'll excuse me, the CPU and I would like to be alone.

  25. Don't forget their next processor line... by Dr+Cool · · Score: 5, Funny

    And for the energy and utility markets, they're making a new line of processors called the Enron. But I hear their beta version had problems with the floating-point unit... it kept inflating numbers by 20% to 50%.

    1. Re:Don't forget their next processor line... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "And for the energy and utility markets, they're making a new line of processors called the Enron. But I hear their beta version had problems with the floating-point unit... it kept inflating numbers by 20% to 50%."

      Don't forget the other handy feature; it empties out the cache! :0

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    2. Re:Don't forget their next processor line... by glsunder · · Score: 1

      The enron processor line is going to targetted specifically at california, where they plan to make a killing.

  26. fuck! by IloveMorphine · · Score: 1

    God, i still remember the days when i had a 500mhz celeron...(shudders)

    1. Re:fuck! by dmitrygr · · Score: 1

      I still use one, you insensitive clod.

      --
      -------
      1. Enjoy your job
      2. Make lots of money
      3. Work within the law

      Choose any two.
    2. Re:fuck! by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still use a 433MHz and a 466Mhz Mendocino Celeron. Not in one box, of course. But the two machines are still in working order. Hell, I have a ThinkPad 600E 400MHz PIIm that is still kicking ass under both Linux and Windows 2K. Don't count the old machines out.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:fuck! by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      300 MHz celery, I mean Celeron. It made a good file server... Now my 1.3 GHz P4 is my file server, and my Athlon XP 3200 is in my main box. The Athlon XP was $10 (Canadian) more then a 3.0GHz Celeron, and is way more powerfull. So if AMD is releasing a competitor (performance wise) to the celeron, you bet it's gonna be alot cheaper.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    4. Re:fuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, well, I was extremely pleased with my old 333Mhz Celeron. Sure beat the 25Mhz 486/DX2 I was using before that. :P

  27. Marketing geniuses... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Funny

    They wanted to emphasize that this was "more" than just a celeron, and of course, they had to keep the -on suffix.

    Introducing the AMD Moron....

    1. Re:Marketing geniuses... by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      You could've given us more details ;)

    2. Re:Marketing geniuses... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Shit, looks like someone beat me to the joke. Don't suppose you'd believe me if I said I've never seen that? Not as if it isn't obvious.

  28. Great for Thin Clients by privaria · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These will probably work fine in thin clients connected to a server running a stable, multitasking, multi-user OS. Actually, they may even be overkill for that.

    Imagine a tiny motherboard using one of these with a basic amount of soldered-in RAM, on-board video and NIC, and an on-board boot flash containing LTSP. Voila, a compact, cheap license-free, diskless, plug-and-play, workstation! How's that for putting Linux on the desktop?

    An open hardware project, anyone?

    1. Re:Great for Thin Clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For thin clients, AMD has both the x86 Geode (acquired from NatSemi, basically an x86 SoC), and the Alchemy line if you'd prefer something in MIPS.

      The Sempron is, as others have noticed, the 64-bit Duron (erm, in the same way that 'Duron' and 'Celeron' were budget models or binnings of modern Athlon and Pentium cores), so heat and power needs will compare to AMD's current chips. (Meanwhile, AMD's current chips are actually doing great in that department versus the P4, so yes, if you can really think of a reason to need GHz of performance in such a machine, a Sempron might just be cheaper and 'better' than any of the truly embedded stuff.)

  29. Semper... by hpa · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first thing the name "Sempron" reminded of was the fact that Semper is a Swedish brand of baby formula.

    1. Re:Semper... by emorphien · · Score: 1

      Perhaps these will bring back my youthful exuberance then.

      Goodbye wrinkles, the new AMD Sempron can crunch your numbers, play your games, and make you feel young again.

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
    2. Re:Semper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did this get modded interesting?

      It doesn't interest me in the least.

    3. Re:Semper... by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      First off, troll day isn't until tomorrow. Secondly, it's an interesting reference to something outside the expected realm of computing devices. Other languages are generally interesting. It may also come from the latin word semper, meaning always, and the word on. It's low cost, and probably lower power, so you can probably afford to leave it always on without getting huge bills for the fans from the electric company.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  30. Re:Where do they get these names? by sploo22 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe I should RTFA...

    NOOOO! Don't do it! Just imagine the chaos if EVERYBODY clicked that link at the same time. We might even crash the server!

    *shudders at the thought*

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  31. Not lower, Higher!!! by elasticwings · · Score: 3, Funny

    Argh, stop making lower processors!!! Make new higher ones. I don't want to be able to afford a new cpu. I want to dream about new fast ones that cost more than I have. :P

  32. AMD what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    AMD Spermon?
    AMD Sempr0n?

    I'd like to applaud the marketing people at AMD for showing that even though you are severely retarded, you can still come up with a name for a a discount CPU.

    And cheers to AMD for having such enlightened hiring practices! Most companies reserve the mentally deficient for IT jobs.

    1. Re:AMD what? by Merovign · · Score: 2, Funny

      On-topic: What is it with the stupid names! Always with the stupid names! Sempron! Opteron! VW Touareg! An economy station wagon called Matrix! Nasal CROM! Semprini! I know it's hard to find names, but criminy!

      Off-topic: If there were a real-life meeting of Kuro5hin.org posters, I would want to know so I could be somewhere else. In comparison, /. is a bastion of fraternal love and kindness. Even on bad days.

  33. Duron = 32bit, Semperon = 64bit? by Unit3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, I believe that the Duron name refers to the lower-end 32-bit chips, whereas Semperon will be lower-end 64-bit chips.

    Feel free to correct me, though.

    --
    -- sudo.ca
  34. Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw the article reference on news.google.com and read it and thought to myself, "Hey, I haven't seen anything on slashdot about this yet; maybe I should submit it." I then read the article, and the only news I got out of it was a marketing name. I saw no specs, no speeds nor power cunsumption numbers nor even the nubmer of bits (32/64) it uses, nothing newsworthy, just a name ("Sempron") and a market ("cheap low end"). I decided not to submit it as an article and waste anyone's time.

    If you've gotten far enough to read this comment, how much spare time did you waste today looking at this article?

    -1 Troll
    +2 Helps you get back to work

  35. Obligatory by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    Semproni?!

    OUT!

  36. And what about the Moron processor? by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:And what about the Moron processor? by Graemee · · Score: 1

      Damn you beat me to it. LOL

      Sempron
      Simpletron
      Moron
      Pinheadron ( A real horror story )

  37. The BBC would like to apologize by XanC · · Score: 2, Funny

    These are the words that are not to be used again on this programme:

    B*M
    B*TTY
    P*X
    KN*CKERS
    KN*CKERS
    W**-W**

  38. ronco ? by anti-NAT · · Score: 1
    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  39. high end personal processor power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    try this strange brew, that's good for you, & freely distributable/hackable too.

  40. Centrino correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Centrino is not a processor. It's a chipset in combination with a Celeron M. The Semperon is intended to compete with the Celeron.

    1. Re:Centrino correction by Silverlancer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Centrino is any system that uses the following: 1. An Intel Pentium-M processor, which is NOT a Celeron and has NO releation to the Pentium 4. The new "Dothan" Pentium-M, overclocked to 2.4Ghz in a recent review competed with the Athlon 64 3400+ in many tests and defeated the 3.4Ghz P4EE in SuperPi. This chip may be where Intel goes next, as it uses only 21 watts yet is faster than the Prescott and can clock high with hardly any cooling. 2. An Intel 850 motherboard (I'm pretty sure about this, can't guarantee it though). 3. And that board has to have integrated wireless. If the notebook has the above three, its a Centrino. Just a fancy name for a Pentium-M high-battery-life machine with wireless.

    2. Re:Centrino correction by Syntax+Heir · · Score: 1

      An Intel 850 motherboard (I'm pretty sure about this, can't guarantee it though)

      You're right on with this, but it's the chipset that is important not the motherboard per se. So we may see other motherboards with appropriate chipsets in the Centrino line.

      --
      The greatest hindrance to success is a well-rationalized excuse
    3. Re:Centrino correction by Tandy+1000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it's the 855 chipset. Also, the wifi module MUST be Intel's to be labeled as Centrino. If no Wifi, or another brand, it can't be labeled as Centrino.

    4. Re:Centrino correction by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It must be approved. D-Link has gotten Centrino approval, for example, on a future card.

      It is the i855, bt I think you can get your chipset Centrino approved, too.

  41. Re:Where do they get these names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOOOO! Don't do it! Just imagine the chaos if EVERYBODY clicked that link at the same time. We might even crash the server!

    Yes, the dreaded "RTFA Effect", which, given this site, will never happen.

  42. Not necessarily.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you take online multiplayer games as an example the GPU is probably only 50% of the equation.

    All the prettiness is handled by the GPU but the CPU is still responsible for generating the OpenGL/DX stream and handling player (and other player) location, physics etc. A good example of this is UT2004 Onslaught which requires as much CPU as GPU power.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  43. look elsewhere by GunFodder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Via already makes a line of small integrated motherboards with most of those requirements, called EPIA. They use their own Eden processor. It's pretty gutless, but it would make a fine file server or I/O device.

  44. Simperon? by Bodhammer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    simper

    \Sim"per\, v. i. [imp. & p. p. Simpered; p. pr. & vb. n. Simpering.] [Cf. Norw. semper fine, smart, dial. Dan. semper, simper, affected, coy, prudish, OSw. semper one who affectedly refrains from eating, Sw. sipp finical, prim, LG. sipp.] 1. To smile in a silly, affected, or conceited manner.

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  45. don't they have duron and athlon by jack_canada · · Score: 1

    i think they can compete with celeron

  46. Fry's ads online by gumpish · · Score: 1


    I'll never understand why Fry's doesn't want people looking at their ads on the web, given what they sell...

    CNet: Fry's shuts down frysad.com

    Sadly it seems this site you refer to doesn't have info about deals for the Austin store, unless that's what "Dallas area" means...

    1. Re:Fry's ads online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are required to enforce your trademark or risk losing it. Blame congress for this one.

  47. No computers. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Low end processors, old processors, crap processors ... the problem is that people still have full-blown computers on their desks. Maybe if you're Joe Seven-Pak (you know, Joe Six-Pak's poweruser cousin) and you edit your home videos on your PC, it makes sense to have the latest and greatest. But I find it completely stupid -- actually, I find it downright obscene -- that businesses with bloody acres full of cubicle dwellers, have not embraced network computing solutions like LTSP or even Citrix. If it weren't for the damned status quo being continously hammered into people's minds by Intel and Microsoft, maybe people would realize that keeping power off the desktop and centralized behind the glass is the best way to lower the TCO of a multiuser environment.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:No computers. by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      I for one want to work somewhere I can run a web browser at high speeds and take on all kinds of new work never realizable before when computers oozed slower than molasses running uphill in the middle of January.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    2. Re:No computers. by insert+3+letters · · Score: 1

      Actually, the last place I worked tried citrix on thin-clients. Frankly, they sucked and most users wanted their old machines back. These were not powerusers, but just regular office workers who wanted word without a frame-rate. Plus, if the central server crashes, you loose a group if workstations rather than one workstation.

    3. Re:No computers. by joib · · Score: 1


      Plus, if the central server crashes, you loose a group if workstations rather than one workstation.


      Which, in practice, is what happens when you lose your NFS/CIFS server as well. So what's the difference?

  48. Combine a Duron with Centrino by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to me that AMD is trying to cash in on the buzz surrounding the Centrino marketing push that Intel is making.

    I can't say I blame them. It's a good idea. AMD has always been a good "budget" performer. Intel may be king of the hill in raw processing power, but in the price/performance battle it's AMD all the way.

    Some might label me as an AMD fanboy because I haven't bought an Intel chip since the P2-300 and because I have sworn off Intel because of the P3's processor ID fiasco. That's fine with me.

    Spend more on Intel than I do on AMD and you'll get a 10% performance bonus at the cost of a 25% price premium.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD 64 bit line is faster than anything x86 that Intel has. And chepaer too. Intel is slower AND more expensive. Especialy true for servers or anything 3d like games. Basicaly, you pay more for Intel's brand name, not for better performance.

    2. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by illumin8 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Some might label me as an AMD fanboy because I haven't bought an Intel chip since the P2-300 and because I have sworn off Intel because of the P3's processor ID fiasco.

      Oh... You're one of those wackos... Well, hey, if you're that paranoid about the processor ID, I got news for you:

      [BLINKY ANNOYING POPUP]
      Your computer is broadcasting an IP address!!!
      [/BLINKY ANNOYING POPUP]

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    3. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      AMD 64 bit line is faster than anything x86 that Intel has.

      That is arguable. The P4EE does outperform the Athlon 64 at some benchmarks.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh... You're one of those wackos...

      Flattery will get you nowhere.

      Your computer is broadcasting an IP address!

      Perhaps you don't understand what "broadcast" means. "Broadcast" infers that the information is sent out for any and all to access. My system doesn't "broadcast" anything. My IP is available, but only to the people that I choose. I can and do use my firewalls (hardware and software) to isolate myself from certain parties. Whenever I choose I can refresh my DHCP information and get a new IP address. The processor ID served no useful purpose.

      Even if you have no such concerns, many of us are concerned with controlling who has access to our information.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you don't understand what "broadcast" means. "Broadcast" infers that the information is sent out for any and all to access. My system doesn't "broadcast" anything. My IP is available, but only to the people that I choose. I can and do use my firewalls (hardware and software) to isolate myself from certain parties. Whenever I choose I can refresh my DHCP information and get a new IP address. The processor ID served no useful purpose.

      OK, well, I'll give you that. Let me give you another example of a unique identifier that already exists in every device connnected to the internet from anywhere: Your MAC address! Better start pulling all your ethernet cards and burning them in a big bonfire... Big Brother will track you down via your MAC address and send you to Guantanamo bay!

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    6. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Let me give you another example of a unique identifier that already exists in every device connnected to the internet from anywhere: Your MAC address! Better start pulling all your ethernet cards and burning them in a big bonfire...

      Try again. I have an nForce 2 Ultra based motherboard with a built in NIC. I can change the MAC through the BIOS.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      The way I buy it's generally a 5% performance increase for a 30% price premium.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    8. Re:Combine a Duron with Centrino by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Intel may be king of the hill in raw processing power

      Yes, Intel MAY BE, but the facts say that it just plain isn't...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  49. IP terms explained by lothar97 · · Score: 1
    Trademarks protect names, logos, slogans and the like. Trademarks apply to different classes of goods and services, thus computer-related goods are in 1 class (class 9), and record production is another class (41). You can have similar (or the same) marks for different goods/services without issues. Apple (computer) got in trouble from Apple (records) with regards to music, as Apple (records) had been using the trademark longer in that area. They signed a big settlement back in the 80s or 90s. Apple (computer) is currently being sued by Apple (records) over the iPod- as Apple (computer) had agreed to stay out of the music field. D'oh!

    Copyrights protect "original works of authorship," which have to be fixed in some sort of medium of expression.

    Patents protect inventions.

    --

  50. W2K by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    W2K will work just fine. I tried XP on such a system and rolled back to W2K in a hurry.

    By the way, XP won't uninstall to roll back to W2K -- it was lucky that I had all my stuff on the old hard disk when I had upgraded to a bigger hard disk.

  51. Simpleton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    AMD announces the Simpleton processor line. Designed to be a replacment for the older Moron line, the Simpleton features 4 more letters in its name. The new line is designed to compete with the current Intel Cheaparon line.

    1. Re:Simpleton by guardia · · Score: 1

      ROTFLOL ... you should have posted this with your longin user name :)

  52. Ok, yeah by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing...

    That's officially the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  53. Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sempron - i know that computers can be addicting, but now with this new name i feel like i should ask my doctor whether it's alright to use one.

  54. name.... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the first thing i saw in the name was Sem pron , so is it optomized for jpeg, and movie decoding or something?

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  55. All the features of our previous model... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    All the features of our previous model...

    But now with tint control!

    (Hackers don't suffer obsolescence gracefully.)

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  56. Re:Where do they get these names? Only If by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    EVERYBODY clicked that link at the same time. We might even crash the server

    Only if the server is running on a Sempron.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  57. Erect AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love a company with a logo styled on the shape of the head of an erect penis.

  58. Sempron by MasTRE · · Score: 0

    AMD bought Sampo Corporation and, hey Ron, released the Sempron. The Sempron is rumored to provide competition to common-variety garden celery.

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  59. How Less = More by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    How much less would it cost AMD to design and build one, best processor using economies of scale to sell it at the best price, as opposed to all these different models at all these different price and performance points?

    And we'd all be so much better off if the did this.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:How Less = More by aka1nas · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize that the sempron will be a regular athlon64 with features disabled? I.E. some of the L2 cache or the "64-bitness".

  60. Semprini anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it me or does this name sound like something from an old Monty Python sketch?

  61. after a quick search... by Nyder · · Score: 3, Funny

    after a quick search I realised the 2 most stupid things that usally gets asked didn't.

    "Can it run linux?"

    "Can you imagine a beowolf cluster of these?"

    thanks

    um, hey, look, the only reason I post stupid stuff like these is because I can't find a job.
    So check my blog if you'd like to help...

    http://nyder.blogspot.com

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:after a quick search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Sempron runs YOU!

    2. Re:after a quick search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wind up regretting it when I read posts this far down in a slashdot article.

  62. what about the new durons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did anyone else hear about the new dual-proc board for low-end AMD processors? it's optimized for playing 80's mp3's. They call it the Duron-Duron. /shamelessly stolen from bash.org

  63. Re:The slower the machine, the more RAM you need by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    The slower the machine, the more RAM you need to make up for things like slower disk IO and such.

    A Pentium III 600 with 512MB will perform just as well or better then a Pentium 4 2Ghz with the 128MB that many computers are still sold with, on everyday tasks like web browsing, grabbing pictures from digital cameras, e-mail, etc. Basically everything but new games.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  64. Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile design. by Glasswire · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...the "Pentium M" processor in Centrino is not a Celeron or any other Pentium 4 Willamette or Northwood or Prescott core derivative.

    It was designed from the ground up to perform well at lower clock speeds to lower power consumption and increase battery life.

  65. Re:Sempron... = TAMPAX competitor by mdrejhon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I first heard about Sempron, I immediately thought it was a new brand of tampons.

    A CPU called a Sempron? No wonder we're running out of trademark namespace!

  66. Re:Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile desi by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    from the ground up?

    I thought it was more like a p3 on steroids.

    not really ground up, then, if that's the case. basically admitting the p4 was a mistake and there's still life left in the p3 design.

    which we knew, anyway, when p3's would beat p4's, at the p4 introduction.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  67. Re: Oh wow. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

    Oh, wow, who woulda thought. The same error sound as when you try to mount an orb heatsink on a bare Athlon/Duron.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  68. Running Server 2003... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

    on a 533 MHz celeron and 128MB of RAM, and a laptop hard drive.

    The scary thing is, it's the one of the most responsive windows machine I have.

    Just goes to show you: Server 2003, it's XP, except it doesn't suck!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  69. What does it matter? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I paid more than $69 to get my OEM XP2500 8 months ago. Try the motherboard, if it suits, fine, if not, toss it, get a better one.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  70. Optimized for P0rn ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be nice for me
    I am still using a old Celeron 333 computer and it can barely play all those divx p0rno :(

  71. Ding ding ding! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are our new Slashdot champion. Lets' break down your +5 score:

    +1 for mentioning Linux.
    +1 for introducing it in a clever, offhand way (a link to kernel.org which will associate the linking phrase in google, YOU SLY DOG YOU!)
    +1 for advocating a return to client/server computing in some form
    +1 for using "open" and "hardware" in the same sentence.

    Good job! I'd shake your hand if I could reach it.
    Now for the bad news:

    You don't know what the FUCK are you talking about.
    The Sempron is going to be 100% like the Duron. Is the Duron in ANY way more suited then any other processor for thin client computing? AMD's new server line of Opterons with lower voltage cores might be a starting point. The Pentium-M might be a starting point. The Sempron is NOT a starting point.

    Oh wait, AMD already sells an embedded x86-compatible processor Am5x86! And, WHAT'S THIS?!?! It even sells a miniature integrated platform, called Elan.

    Well tie me up and violate me with a spoon. Do you enjoy being such a karma whore or are you just that ignorant?

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  72. Re:Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile desi by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Yeah, from what I remember it's basically a faster clocked P3 with four times the L2 cache, additional instruction sets, and the ability to use DDR memory. (Plus some advanced power-saving stuff, like only needing energy for the cache being used.)

  73. Its the name ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just me .... but Sempron, as a name, doesn't .... I mean ... Ok,look. You go up to the customer and say "but this one has the new AMD Sempron processor."

    Athlon, Duron, Celeron, Pentium, Centrino, they all work. Sempron doesn't.

    The name has gotta have balls. Go up to the customer and say they can have a Sempron or the new eco-optimised AMD Fluxron with Hyperdrive and see which box flies out the door.

    It's hard to pump Sempron. It just doesn't diddle the clit of imagination. Somebody at AMD is trying to hard me thinks.

    The new AMD Sellitron... I'm here all week....

    1. Re:Its the name ... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2

      Maybe it's just me

      Yep, you're a crackhead.

      It's hard to pump Sempron.

      I pump my sempron every day! Now I get to put my sempron in my computer. My wife's gonna get jealous at last. :(

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Its the name ... by bjoeg · · Score: 1

      Athlon, Duron, Celeron, Pentium, Centrino, they all work. Sempron doesn't.

      Try saying Geode, AMD's low power CPU equalivent to VIA's C3. Even in my native language Geode sounds weird.

  74. If you're putting Viagra in your computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you're taking overclocking to a whole new level!

  75. Re:actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually without in spanish is SIN not sem.

  76. Re:Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile desi by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1
    :::from the ground up?

    I thought it was more like a p3 on steroids.:::



    It's more like a hybrid P6/Netburst core.

    Basically, it gets from Netburst:
    • AGTL+ FSB instead of GTL (quad-pumped instead of SDR)
    • improved branch prediction (with improvements even beyond those in the regular P4 line)
    • longer pipeline (though not as long as Willamette/Northwood... closer to original P6 core, actually)

    What Netburst has that Pentium-M doesn't:
    • trace cache

    What is has that Netburst doesn't:
    • micro-up fusion


    I'm not so sure about Netburst lacking micro-op fusion though.
    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  77. Re:Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile desi by dcam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look at this article

    Basically a P3, with more cache and some of the features of a P4 (improved branch sheduler) and none of the crud (long pipelines).

    --
    meh
  78. Lexicon Branding by vistic · · Score: 1

    Lexicon Branding's work, I'd suspect. That'd be a nice job to think up funny words all day.

  79. Oog. Thought I was the only one left using a K-6 by James4765 · · Score: 1
    But I'm running Fedora Core 1. Slllooooowwwly...

    My *%&^#% 60Mhz dual-processor SS20 is faster sometimes - but I kept the groovy Gateway 2000 server chassis! I feel like I'm really using UNIX - some whacking-big tower under the desk! Plus, there's enough drive bays that I'll never fill them up.

  80. Re:Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile desi by Fweeky · · Score: 1

    Right, but that's called the Pentium-M, not Centrino; unless you've seen the name used officially outside complete laptops with integrated WiFi.. :)

    Looking at Intel's Centrino page seems to confirm this; it's a "range of technologies", including Intel's wireless networking hardware, motherboard chipset and the Pentium-M. Hence it's not a processor family, it's a mobile technology family, which includes a processor family name most people will at least partly recognise.

    But anyway, </pedantic> :)

  81. Don't they teach you history or geography? by Binary+Judas · · Score: 1

    Ooh, let me guess. You're American?
    Who else would think Athens was "the home of the Roman empire"
    I bet you don't know what Canada or Mexico is..

    --

    Tua consilia omnia nobis clariora sunt quam lux. Tu delenda est!

  82. I will not buy low-end computer until ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I will want a cheaper PC SMP-server:

    Dual Athlon32MP TBred+ S.O.I. 90nm L1=64KiB+64KiB L2=256KiB 4.0 GHz FSB=400MHz single-channel (few but fastest transistors)
    4 GiB RAM DDR2-800 ECC CL222 (4 slots x 1 GiB modules)
    Good motherboard Via KT1600Pro with 5 PCI-X slots.

    open4free ©

    1. Re:I will not buy low-end computer until ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a good engineer and/or designer? :)

    2. Re:I will not buy low-end computer until ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Tyan motherboards?

    3. Re:I will not buy low-end computer until ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I remember that AthlonXP 2700+ with core TBred was faster than AthlonXP 2700+ with core Barton in mostly benchmarks because it did have more little GHz and his L2-cache's size was the half (lower latencies too).

      Minor number of faster transistors is better than Major number of slower transistors .

      open4free ©

  83. I'm lost. Why is this needed? by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

    Most AMD chips are already priced at or below Celerons. Why do they need a cheaper chip? Celerons are much cheaper than their Intel counterparts. I can't see these chips being prices low enough to dog the real deal.

    In the old days, computer always cost $5,000. You want a computer? $5k. Now you can get them for $1k for business use, less than that for home use? So AMD is going to offer a chip for $25 less? What's the point?

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  84. You're wrong. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Playing games that don't exist is not the only problem for a budget system. In addition to these processors being slated as "budget", the manufacturers will add junk to either use outdated, or unreliable, or undated and unreliable for video (I still remember the awe when I saw brand new top of the line P4's with that cheap stuff). Put that together with a standard 48x cdrw and you have a system that is totally void of anything worthwhile.

    This is not to diss AMD, I'm sure the Sempron will kill the celeron, and likely compete with the p4 on an even clock speed, but the big manufacturers will treat it like a Cyrix (They see: P4, Athlon, Celeron, then Sempron). I cannot feel strongly enough about my friends who go out and buy a "cheap" celeron for $500. Just imagine all the people who would sell them their 3 year old gaming system, a system to totally blow away the modern "Screaming fast" PC.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  85. Will it support the NX command? by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    Not mentioned in the article but I know AMD has announced it's coming out with a low end CPU (Duron replacement) that supports the No Execute command - is this the one? If so that was fast! Has Intel said anything about doing the same with their P4 series or Celeron CPUs? I know that Intel does it or will do it with their 64bit stuff but I'm curious about more Joe User consumer level CPUs. AMD is doing it with their 64bit CPU too so it looks like Intel may have to follow them on again.

    Along those lines - anyone tested this functionality? How effective is the NX going to be - is it all hoopla and wishful thinking? Does the beta SP2 for XP carry the code to support the NX stuff so that it can at least be tested for effectiveness?

    News.com reported Linux will have this before MSFT (lol) but I'm really wondering just how many of the exploits out there this will stop...

    Okay, so maybe OT but if this CPU command really is effective having low cost CPUs supporting it could really help things. Heh and being an AMD stock holder I'd love to see them beat Intel up on this :-)

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  86. yes, actually by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    And it's the same question:

    Why would Athens be considered the 'home of the Roman Empire' when it never was, not even within the East-Roman empire?

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  87. THose responsible for sacking those responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for that last announcement.... Have been sacked.

    The BBC would like to apologize for any confusion
    which may have arisen due to this sudden change in programming.

  88. My 1000mhz Athlon board died... I'm at 500mhz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now and loving it. *shrug*
    I pulled my old Athlon 500 (SLOT A, LOL)and board out of the closet and the only complaint I have
    is that it has a bit of a slow harddrive on it.

    No I don't play games on it.. but it's snappy fast
    once linux is loaded.

  89. Target market: dick weak by bartok · · Score: 1

    It looks like the target market is men who need to compensate about something. Maybe they should ship a free bottle of Viagra to the first 100 000 early adopters.

    For the humor impâred, this is supposed to be funny sarcasm.

  90. Last post!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lp!

  91. I think the name by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    comes from tampon, it's designed to fill another crack in the market.