Slashdot Mirror


iTunes Europe Goes Live

Spad writes "The Register is reporting the launch of iTunes in the UK, France and Germany. "iTunes will carry 700,000 songs from the five major record labels and independents, and prices for the download service start at 79 pence or 99 euro cents per song." It's not ideal (99c is about 55p) but it's better pricing than expected. I for one will be signing up to use it."

451 comments

  1. Since this is an Apple product by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know there is a Windows client for I-Tunes, but this article made me wonder.

    How many Apple users are there in Europe anyway?

    (Not trying to belittle them in any way, I'm just curious)

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
    1. Re:Since this is an Apple product by byolinux · · Score: 1

      I'm a UK Mac user. I know of dozens.

    2. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a UK Mac user. I know of dozens.

      So all of them, you're saying.

    3. Re:Since this is an Apple product by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      a surprising amount actually, though Apples big client outside the US is Japan.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    4. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm in the Netherlands, I've had to fix Macs for a living alongside "normal" pc's.

      I haven't seen a lot Macs, even though that the store that I worked for was one of the biggest Mac-retailers in the NL. They stopped selling them a while ago though, but I think they will be back soon since they are gaining popularity again.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    5. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Troll

      How many Apple users are there in Europe anyway?

      There are 3, and when Steve Jobs is in town he makes 4

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    6. Re:Since this is an Apple product by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's at least one that I don't know; they're the one who supply half the others with pirate software.

      Personally, I like all the Free Software that I can run on my Mac... mmmmm GIMP.

    7. Re:Since this is an Apple product by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Informative

      How many Apple users are there in Europe anyway?

      (UK-specific)

      I've encountered very few, mainly in printing/advertising, etc. Apple in the US seem to have targetted education heavily; in the UK that niche was filled first (80s) by Acorn and Research machines, then latterly by PC-clones.

      The only two Macs I've seen recently were:

      • a testing box, here in the office, and
      • a gorgeous powerbook owned by a colleague (a Java developer)

      However... iPods appear to be extremely popular. I'd guess they're the Windows-variety, though. (I suppose it's also possible that there aren't that many iPods - just a lot of kids with white headphones ;)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    8. Re:Since this is an Apple product by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

      During a recent-ish slashdot discussion I had an argument with an American over Apple's being too expensive. As it turned out that we both agreed that in the UK they were too expensive, but in the US they were much more affordable. Apple are really aiming for the premium market in the UK it seems, with pricing to match. It's noticeably cheaper to build up or buy an Intel-based PC so the only people I know with Macs are big Mac fans.

    9. Re:Since this is an Apple product by gerbouille · · Score: 1

      France is (was ???) the biggest apple market in Europe IIRC

      --
      This post is displayed with recycled electrons
    10. Re:Since this is an Apple product by ollie_ob · · Score: 1

      Europe's population is quite a bit greater than the United States, ergo there are likely to be a greater number of Mac users in Europe than in the US.

      --
      #define ROSE any_other_name
    11. Re:Since this is an Apple product by TheGatekeeper · · Score: 0

      DNA was a well-known and outspoken Mac user, and he was British as all get-out.

      --
      'The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than a prop for age,' -Hamá, the doorward
    12. Re:Since this is an Apple product by byolinux · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be fair, you can buy a new Mac for 550UKP

    13. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most surprising amount to me has always been 11.

    14. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'd love to buy a nice G5 or a Powerbook, but at the current exchange rates it sometimes works out cheaper to fly return to New York from Heathrow and buy the item over there, assuming no one from customs wants to ask questions. Personally, I can't afford to pay such a premium.

    15. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Eslyjah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm in the Netherlands, I've had to fix Macs for a living alongside "normal" pc's.

      I haven't seen a lot Macs, even though that the store that I worked for was one of the biggest Mac-retailers in the NL.


      Could it be because Macs don't break as often?

    16. Re:Since this is an Apple product by naden · · Score: 0

      So all of them, you're saying.

      Anonymous Coward: The Ultimate Flame-Retardent Suit

      --
      Funtage Factor: Purple
    17. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Nope, don't think so, the problem I saw most was with the harddrive or the software.

      Replacing the harddrive in an I-Mac is pretty easy and they take normal IDE drives, so you don't need an Apple specific part (saves money).

      On another note, the Tech service department from Apple have always been extra polite to me and helped me pretty darn fast. I only had one incident with them, but they were not the cause of that (bad monitor, damaged plastic etc during repair, whole thing took 9 months, but this is an extreme example)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    18. Re:Since this is an Apple product by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

      You are indeed correct. I think at the time we were looking at iMac prices rather than eMac. Though quite how the lowest iMac can cost 450 quid more for a flat screen than the eMac I'm not sure, since the other specs seem to be roughly equivalent - am I missing something there?

    19. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 4, Informative
      However... iPods appear to be extremely popular. I'd guess they're the Windows-variety, though. (I suppose it's also possible that there aren't that many iPods - just a lot of kids with white headphones ;)

      Reportedly, one out of every six iPods sold over the Christmas quarter last year was sold in the UK. Apparently they're every bit as popular in the UK as anywhere else.

      Apple no longer makes Windows-specific iPods, incidentally. The earlier models were platform-specific, but the models made since April 28th of last year have all been officially Mac-Windows. I would indeed assume the overwhelming majority of those UK iPods are probably being used with Windows, of course.

    20. Re:Since this is an Apple product by doru · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I did my PhD in France and in many physics laboratories down there Macs outnumber PCs; they are even used for driving experimental setups and for data acquisition, not just as desktop machines.

      I used a PowerMac 7300 for data treatment before starting to write my dissertation (at which point I switched to PC).

    21. Re:Since this is an Apple product by macguys · · Score: 1

      I just returned from a trip to the Netherlands and Belgium. On my trip, I was in the homes of friends and collegues. Out of the 14 homes I visited, 12 of them were MacOS users. Perhaps I just have smart friends?

      --
      wherever I go, there I am.
    22. Re:Since this is an Apple product by matticus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the Max Planck Institute for Cell Biology and Genetics where I am a sysadmin, we have about 300 Macs. It's supposed to be Mac-only, but some of our microscopes only run Windows.

    23. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2003 10-K Report states that Apple sold 684000 Macs in EU down 5% from 2002

      http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=1073 57 &p=irol-reports

    24. Re:Since this is an Apple product by robmyers · · Score: 1

      Certainly in the UK there are lots of Macs in pre-press, quite a few in design and music, some in the home, and a very few in education.
      There's magazines, dealers, web sites, user groups etc. We even have Mac developers (I'm often one :-) ).

    25. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Nickus · · Score: 1

      I work at an institute where we have a bit over 400 Macs. Much better platform on the desktop than Windows computers.

    26. Re:Since this is an Apple product by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      That's pretty bad logic.

      The US has a larger population than France, therefore there are likely to be more Peugeot drivers in the US than in France.

      Nope, doesn't work.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    27. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google still has them @ 3% http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html the same since OSX....

    28. Re:Since this is an Apple product by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      That's certainly true of the G3 iMac - you just pop the case open and unscrew the caddy. I actually wrote about that in my /. journal not so long ago, so take a look if you're interested. The G4 iMac, OTOH, is a completely different kettle of bricks. Opening that up to do anything other than remove the airport card is a bit of a task, and if you need to change the fan then you've got to empty all of the components out of the case, then put them all back in the right order (applying thermal paste as you go).

    29. Re:Since this is an Apple product by 4lex · · Score: 1

      In the room I'm sitting, I count an IRIX silicon O2, a linux iBook, a Panther iBook, a linux PC and a Jaguar iBook. Next room, I see two Windows XP PCs and a MacOS9 Powerbook. In my faculty (chemistry) we have three computer rooms for students: two windows PCs and one MacOSX. For post-graduate students, a linux PC room was recently opened.

      Outside the university, I only saw Macs in a design store... and in Apple stores, of course, and in some general computer stores also.

      (Talking about Spain, btw).

      --
      My journal. Mainly about freedom.
    30. Re:Since this is an Apple product by jfengel · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Mac may not break, but the users...

      A friend of mine is a Mac repair technician. Mac people tend to be artsy types, and artsy types (unlike programmers) tend to smoke.

      He posted a photo of a Mac motherboard owned by a smoker next to a picture of the anchor from the Titanic. Guess which had less accumulated grime.

    31. Re:Since this is an Apple product by HaroldBakker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seeing as Windows is more prone to bugs and viri this seems logical.

    32. Re:Since this is an Apple product by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Not much. The biggest part of the price difference is the flatscreen monitor vs. CRT. Other than that its parts/materials/labor differences. I don't know that the profit margin is really any different on them.

    33. Re:Since this is an Apple product by akgunkel · · Score: 1

      You're right, the G3 iMac really is easier to get into than one would think. I replaced the 10GB HD in mine with an 80GB one about 8 months ago. On the whole, it was roughly comparible to popping open a classic or SE/30 in the good old days.

      Last night I stripped my iBook SE (toilet seat)down to the mobo so I could swap out the broken DC power connector. What a bitch that was. But I did it and once again it's been returned to full functioning.

    34. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Buran · · Score: 4, Funny

      *cracks up*

      I work at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, also in the Cell Biology department. We have one Bio-Rad confocal. Windows-only software that is terrible, full of bugs, and crashes all the time. We have Windows-only analysis software which the developer simply refuses to port to the Mac despite Apple practically begging them to. It runs, but it requires a hardware dongle -- stupid buggy thing. We do have a camera which has Mac drivers... the drivers never seem to crash.

      I have some hope as Bio-Rad sold their confocal business to Zeiss. Maybe Zeiss will put out a Mac version of that horrid software.

    35. Re:Since this is an Apple product by TVC15 · · Score: 1

      What I wonder is how long before MS changes the way Services work (or something) so that iTunes doesn't work anymore. And/or iTMS.

    36. Re:Since this is an Apple product by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I suspect that even with apple begging, the vs doesnt stack up.

    37. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Buran · · Score: 1

      The what? (*confused*)

      It would actually make a lot more sense for Mac software to exist in places like this because Macs are a lot more common (there is more of a balance between the major platforms - Mac/Windows/Linux - in educational institutions). I'm a support type. I recommend Macs whenever possible -- a lab upstairs from us is about to order a boatload of G5s and I recommended what configuration to get.

    38. Re:Since this is an Apple product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Independent labels won't agree to the Apple deal as Apple refuse to pay them the same rate they pay major labels, even though indies were promised a level playing field when itunes launched.

  2. oh well by hubby105 · · Score: 1

    apple uk is down and i want to spend my money!

    1. Re:oh well by MetaMarty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just spend your money on allofmp3.com! You'll get at least 20x the amount of music for your money than on itunes. Also, allofmp3 pays artist, but doesn't pay the RIAA. You can download legally, without worrying that you're paying for legal battles against your fellow music downloaders.

    2. Re:oh well by jasoncart · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to look at apple.co.uk? Their UK site is at http://www.apple.com/uk/, I'm not seeing any Akamai issues in the UK.

    3. Re:oh well by pbranes · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I'm in the US - east coast, and I can't get to a lot of site: www.yahoo.com, www.microsoft.com, www.akamai.com, and others. I keep getting DNS lookup failures.

      Anybody know what's going on with DNS today??

    4. Re:oh well by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Anybody know what's going on with DNS today??

      Rick Moranis has launched a bird to destroy humanity. It ate DNS.

    5. Re:oh well by filth+grinder · · Score: 1

      I'm having the same DNS issues. Also in the US and on the east coast.

      I haven't been able to find out whats going on with DNS either. I can't get yahoo, google, and others to resolve. I've tested multiple locations as well.

    6. Re:oh well by phaze3000 · · Score: 1
      I'm seeing serious issues with akamai here in the UK (AS15729).

      DNS lookups on Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are all failing intermittently.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    7. Re:oh well by hubby105 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i had the right url as mentioned before, dns was a little screwed for a while have to say that i'm not that impressed with the range, way too many listed artists with nothing to sell. here's hoping it improves as the browsing / buying experience is pretty good

    8. Re:oh well by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Same here, Altavista, Google, Gmail, and a lot of other sites are having intermittant connection issues.

      Looks like Akamai have emptied their cache in UK ISPs/Telehouse.

    9. Re:oh well by SlamMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too bad some of us want music we've actually heard before.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
  3. Gggrrrrrrr!!!!! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the rest of us!!!

    Must we wallow forever in the sinful pleasures of bearshare and kazaa?

    Save us oh Jobby one!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Gggrrrrrrr!!!!! by aixou · · Score: 1

      Must we wallow forever in the sinful pleasures of bearshare and kazaa?


      Music has been sold via hardcopy in stores for decades, and in higher quality than you'll ever find on Kazaa! You can't spin your usage of Kazaa as you being a victim. Get up and trot over to your local music store and pick up an album.

      I don't mind people who get singles from Kazaa (hell, the things play on the radio all day), but it irritates me when someone takes a self-righteous stance and acts as if they deserve all the free music and movies they can get their hands on. (not saying you are.. I'm just ranting)

    2. Re:Gggrrrrrrr!!!!! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      Music has been sold via hardcopy in stores for decades, and in higher quality than you'll ever find on Kazaa! You can't spin your usage of Kazaa as you being a victim. Get up and trot over to your local music store and pick up an album.

      I can't leave my house you insensitive clod!

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:Gggrrrrrrr!!!!! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Get up and trot over to your local music store and pick up an album.

      Does this include body movement?
      You're clearly out of your mind!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  4. uk + fr + de != eu by kraker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What? Only UK, France and Germany?

    Why not the whole of Europe? Did Apple also excluded one or more of the States of America?

    Grmbl...

    1. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by capmilk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not all of Europe?
      Well, probably, because they could not agree with the record companies. That's why.

    2. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by sjb2016 · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA and see that an EU store will be opening in the fall. Also, the U.S., while made up of many constituent states, has one unified copyright set by the federal government. Europe has many varying laws, from country to country, I'd imagine.

    3. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      or more the record companies couldnt agree with Apple, you know kinda like how the US record companies are trying to force Apple to charge more than 9.99 for albums by not releasing entire albums unless they get their way.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    4. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by swiert · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple also announced that the iTMStores would open all over the European Union in October.

      For instance, see:

      http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2004/jun/15itune s. html

    5. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Informative

      Europe has many varying laws, from country to country, I'd imagine.

      That's broadly it - in theory there's a unified directive; in practice only two states had implemented it as of end 2002.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    6. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by kraker · · Score: 1

      Well, I did RTFA, I don't see any mention of an EU store opening anytime, neither in the fall nor in the autumn ;-) But I guess you're right, even though we just voted for the European Union, each country has its own laws. That's probably a good reason...

    7. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Informative

      The difference is that there is one copyright authority governing the entire US, and there is one copyright authority for every country in the EU, so supposedly you have to negotiate 25 different deals for every EU member country. The EU is not a country, it's a trade union.

      On the other hand, I'm curious about something: amazon can sell music cd's across europe, why can't apple sell music files across europe? Does amazon have some kind of special deal to allow them to sell copyrighted materials in every country? Or is the internet again being treated like the bastard stepdaughter of the copyright world?

    8. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by wfberg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is probably due to two things;

      1) licensing issues. Each European country tends to have their own licensing agency, which licenses, say the latest Madonna track - even though the rights in all countries might be owned by a single company, you still have to go through these intermediaries (monopolies).

      While it is in theory possible to negotiate terms with only one intermediary for the whole of Europe (and has been for some time, think only of all the unencrypted pan-European tv and radio stations) it is in practice not only hard to do (these monopolies are bureaucracies which have a hard time understanding the Internet - there IS no standard contract) but you won't be able to shop around for a European tarriff. That is, if you close a deal within a country, you can bargain, but pan-European rights are locked down in a monopoly by way of agreement along all the national intermediaries.

      2) Europeans tend to speak different languages from country to country.

      They also have entirely different national banking systems, which only pay lip service to a single European transaction system. (e.g. yes, you can transfer money using an IBAN account number at the same rate as national money transfers (sometimes this is free), but good luck getting a form or e-banking page in which you can enter an IBAN acct number - and if you, the bank, or the receiver screws up, the banks don't accept any liability what so ever. Credit cards come closest to an international standard for funds transfer, but few Europeans have them, and even fewer would give out the number on the internet).

      Then there's the issue of sales tax, statutory customer rights (the EU wide policies only specify the minimum, so member states could have enacted laws that allow for returns of tunes), etc. etc.

      Opening up a pan-European shopping site is no mean feat.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    9. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Informative

      the problem isn't varying laws however.. rather varying companies/organizations/license_deals.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by NoNeeeed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, from this article at the Reg (the one linked to in the article has been removed from their front page)...

      The Euro prices will be maintained when Apple launches a pan-European store to cater for the continents other nations. Jobs promised it would open by "October", and will initially be offered only in English. Jobs offered no comment on the launch of Canadian or Japanese stores.

      So it is probably a combination of having to bash out licencing issues with the companies, and logistical issues to do with roll-out, marketing, billing etc.

      Either way, looks like they will get there in the end. Although it looks like you are screwed if you are Canadian.

    11. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Even in the EU, there's a lot more differences in the laws from country to country than from state to state.

    12. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by shantipole · · Score: 1

      A European Union version is expected in October of this year according to Apple.

    13. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad people are so well informed about the EU.
      Like it or not, but most laws (especialy copyright) are comming together under one law for all member states.

    14. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by blobglob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Credit cards come closest to an international standard for funds transfer, but few Europeans have them

      I know of no one who does not have a credit card, with the possible exception of an old relative. I live in the UK. Is it different elsewhere in Europe?

      Other than that, I agree strongly.

    15. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by bterzic · · Score: 1

      The licensing issue is probably the reason this isn't Europe-wide, I don't think your second point is valid at all.

      Everyone has credit cards over here and as for making pan-European (or global) shopping sites? See Amazon. In fact, Apple already has a good deal of online shops available (selling hardware and software) in countries other than the UK, Germany and France.

    16. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Did Apple also excluded one or more of the States of America?
      Yes...Canada.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    17. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by bwalling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      he US record companies are trying to force Apple to charge more than 9.99 for albums

      Strangely, the new Beastie Boys album is $15 in iTunes, and $10 at BestBuy, Circuit City and Target. Why wouldn't I just buy the CD, then?

    18. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon has a different shop for every country.

      You can't get anything delivered to a different country.

    19. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Like it or not, but most laws (especialy copyright) are comming together under one law for all member states.

      That's true, but we're not talking about copyright law, we're talking about copyright owners. Each country has its own governing body for managing copyright assets under the law. In the EU, copyright law is supposed to be paneuropean (though the EU Copyright Directive slipped in a number of DMCA-style things which are slowing adoption), but copyright ownership is still a country by country situation.

    20. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amazon has a different shop for every country.

      You can't get anything delivered to a different country.


      Not true. Amazon.co.uk sells to all countries in the EU. Amazon.com even sells music cd's to EU countries, but the price is prohibitively expensive.

    21. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ahh you now see the problem with it.... What I have been doing is just not listening... I will preview a few tracks and If I like them, buy them, not the album. I have then been emailing the publisher telling them how furious as a buyer I am at them for what they are doing.

      Finally I send my senator a copy of the webpage, and a ad showing the CD price and a letter basically running down how it should be cheaper to buy online, not more or equal to in price.

      Its a lot of work, but luckly its only a few companies who are doing it right now (Capitol/EMI being the worst of them) hopefully something will happen that will bring this to light to the general consumer

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    22. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Thundertje · · Score: 1
      but good luck getting a form or e-banking page in which you can enter an IBAN acct number - and if you, the bank, or the receiver screws up,
      Well one of the biggest banks in the world, the Dutch ABN-Amro, does it. And it works like a charm. You just copy paste the IBAN number in the little insertfield write a comment, type the amount of money you want transfered *click* and your done. One day later the other guy has the money.
      This really works well, and if you just copy paste the IBAN number it is very hard to fuck things up.
    23. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a data point -- international wire transfers from an online bank are not unheard of. My bank (one of the largest in Finland) does support them, even outside the EU. I've bought a lot of stuff from ebay.de and some from the US without any problems except for the usual occasional fraudster.

      There was one guy in former Eastern Germany who couldn't get a proper IBAN number from his bank, the clerk just slapped on some random checksum digits even when he went back to double-check the number. We got it straightened out by noticing that their online bank had an automatic form that could compute the IBAN correctly from an account number...

    24. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by wfberg · · Score: 3, Informative

      but good luck getting a form or e-banking page in which you can enter an IBAN acct number - and if you, the bank, or the receiver screws up,

      Well one of the biggest banks in the world, the Dutch ABN-Amro, does it. And it works like a charm. You just copy paste the IBAN number in the little insertfield write a comment, type the amount of money you want transfered *click* and your done. One day later the other guy has the money.
      This really works well, and if you just copy paste the IBAN number it is very hard to fuck things up.


      ABN Amro's operations differ from country to country. Besides, it's a lot harder to use IBAN transactions with Postbank (which has the largest number of accounts in The Netherlands) and outfits like SNS, ING, etc. (Rabobank does support it, but makes it easy to select a non-IBAN, non-free method, and, AFAIK will charge you if you make a mistake in someone's name for example).

      Also, when you use a method like Credit Card, paypal, direct debit (there is NO pan-European direct debit!) etc. which are integrated into e-commerce software, your payment information is linked to the transaction, whereas if you pay manually, they have to figure out which payment belongs to which transaction. Minor differences in the amount transferred (you DID enter 14.29, NOT 14.30, right?), your initials etc. all offer new opportunities to fuck things up (this is a non-trivial problem called "reconciliation").

      There are multi-country payment service providers (such as bibit but typically they don't cover all of the EU.

      A Europe-wide IBAN-like scheme for direct debit would be a godsend at this time..

      Or even better, some sort of use-your-regular-bank-account-as-a-"credit"-card scheme where you simply enter your IBAN, your bank gets your authorization via e-banking/phone/whatever, and the payment is cleared would be pretty much ideal.

      Then, you only have to worry about all those different mail/parcel services and all those different laws, customs and tax offices, etc.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    25. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by ivano · · Score: 1
      well in most of the continent a credit card is not a credit card like in UK, US and Australia. I don't know the right term so i'll just describe it to you : if I use my credit card to buy something then I have to pay it ALL back at the end/beginning of the month. Not 10% of the total - everything! Hence this is why most of the continent does not have the same consumer debt level as say the UK. I was lucky enough to get one of the last "real" credit cards before the government banned any new ones being accepted. But I had to ask and insist

      In other words in the Continent the economy isn't based on consumer debt.

      ciao

      I actually haven't answered the question : On the Continent most people don't need a credit card - which is why they're so few of them.

    26. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Credit cards come closest to an international standard for funds transfer, but few Europeans have them

      I know of no one who does not have a credit card, with the possible exception of an old relative. I live in the UK. Is it different elsewhere in Europe?


      It's hard to find exact statistics. Mastercard claims 3 million cardholders in Belgium, versus 450.000 VISA cardholders. In The Netherlands, the claims are 3 million MC, 2 million Visa. (There may be some overlap there).

      Note that Belgium's population numbers 10 million, whereas The Netherlands has 16 million inhabitants, so even if you add up those cardholders, that's only 31% of the Dutch populace, and only 34.5% of the Belgian population that presumably have a credit card (which is not to say they ever use it - I know mine collects dust except for those 4 times a year I use it to buy stuff online; they're also often thrown in as a freebie with a bank's travel insurance).

      In other words, if you only accept credit cards, you're scaring away at least 70% of your potential customers.

      Note that in the US the number of cards issued stands at more than 700 million. More than 2.3 cards per person.

      (This all neglects the fact that only adults can have a card, so the percentages are skewed. Though, not being able to sell to minors is also a disadvantage.)

      In my experience, younger people, and people who travel are more likely to have a credit card.

      It is said (my sources? google!) that credit card usage in France rivals that of the US, and in the UK and Germany usage levels are about the same.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    27. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't.

      It's almost as if the record company would RATHER you buy singles on iTMS. Remember, no one has (or ever will) accused these people of being smart.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    28. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a minor correction:
      The EU is more than just a trade union.
      1. EU members are trying to forge an EU constitution.
      2. They are working on a common defense strategy.
      3. They are working on a unified foreign policy
      and other things I can't remember ATM.

      On your other point, you import a physical good when you buy CDs from Amazon. There are import tariff and regulations associated with them. However, when you download, you are buying data which is not on any tangible good. There, copyright law takes over.

    29. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by nikster · · Score: 1

      They also have entirely different national banking systems,...

      all EU banks are required by law to allow wireless transfers to other banks within the EU at the same conditions as transfers within the country.

      i did it recently. my bank's online banking site has a form to enter the IBAN. a few days later it arrived at the destination bank. no fees involved - the entire transfer was free.

      i agree on the Credit card thing. no one has them in europe. the reason is probably that, pre-internet, we had EC cards which were subsequently used like debit cards. so no one really needed a debit-visa card.

      the problem is, these EC cards don't have a credit card number. they are directly linked to your account number at the bank. so they are not suitable for online commerce - the banks won't accept an EC card number without PIN code, and they won't send the PIN over the internet.

      this system is much safer than, say, visa debit cards, but it also means there is no way for anyone to pay online. whereas, in america, everybody gets a visa-debit card and everything is happy. if the number is abused, you get a new visa card, you are not responsible for fraud, etc.

      i think it's a failure of the banks that they have not re-introduced the visa debit card... credit is not seen as a good thing in europe, so it never will be as wide-spread as in the US. as of now, it's not even offered. just one of the strange things hampering e-business in europe.

    30. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by roard · · Score: 1

      I don't know for other countries, but in France nearly everybody has a credit card (visa, mastercard, etc) with a chip. After all we invented it ;-) [well, Roland Moreno did it]



      \begin{rant}

      In GB though my bank refused to give me a credit card (yes, you know, thoses 25yo PhD students could leave the country with our money ! moron...) and only allowed me a cash card (can't pay with it). Which is quite strange for me, as I got one in France since I'm 15. Doh.

      \end{rant}
    31. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by VoxCombo · · Score: 1

      If Apple wanted to pay the standard licensing fee for the recordings, then it would not be a problem.
      However, Apple negotiates reduced rates for the music it sells, thus complicating the issue, and making it an whole affair to sell in new markets.

    32. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      good luck getting a form or e-banking page in which you can enter an IBAN acct number - and if you, the bank, or the receiver screws up, the banks don't accept any liability what so ever.

      Good, I can't tell you much more, but I have been implementing a webbanking application for a large bank (at least in my country) and I was assigned the transfers. Go figure: you can't screw up an IBAN account if it's implemented well. It's not possible. On top of that banks (should) prefer IBAN accounts because it tells them about everything about the target bank and country. And if you want to go really secure, make sure that the BIC number is there and you're safe. All other information is just for redundancy.
      Oh, and my country is switched 100%: you can't get a bill where there isn't a IBAN number written on it and all major banks switched to it on their webbanking applications. Heck, I haven't seen a normal account number in over a year.

      Credit cards come closest to an international standard for funds transfer, but few Europeans have them, and even fewer would give out the number on the internet

      I haven't met a person under 50 (and over 18 of course) that doesn't have one. They might be reluctant to use it on the internet, but not as much as you state. Most of my friends (including non-techs) have already bought at Amazon, and that implies credit card (unless you live in Germany, where you can pay per bank order if I recall correctly)

      Opening up a pan-European shopping site is no mean feat.

      I agree with that, but it's not the lack of financial possibilities that do that. The main reason is that Europe is not a country. Every country has its own equivalent of the RIAA and Apple must negociate with all of them. (But then I'm not going to rehash your first paragraph ;-) )

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    33. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by chillmost · · Score: 1
      I live in Germany and I don't have a credit card. Now excuse me while I go to iTMS Germany and download my favorite Oktoberfest oompa oompa drinking songs. Zum Wohl!

      ...Oh, wait.
      Scheisse!

    34. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Either way, looks like they will get there in the end. Although it looks like you are screwed if you are Canadian.

      Oh no, I can't buy music from iTunes for $1/song. How will I find the courage to keep on living? Oh. Wait. Now I remember. Canadian copyright law allows a person to make a copy of a song for personal use legally. But let's say you can't find a song you want or you can find it but it's bad quality. Canada does have at least one music store: puretracks.ca

      But they offer DRM Windows Media files and you probably want something unrestricted. That's where a site like allofmp3.com comes in. Pay by the megabyte and legal in Canada.

    35. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1
      the problem is, these EC cards don't have a credit card number. they are directly linked to your account number at the bank. so they are not suitable for online commerce - the banks won't accept an EC card number without PIN code, and they won't send the PIN over the internet.

      That actually depends on the country, which of course doesn't make things any easier. Here in Finland at least, the debit cards *do* have numbers. For example, my card is a combination Visa/debit card and the same number works for both uses. Many Finnish online merchants accept debit cards as payment, along with online account transfers and credit cards.

    36. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Apple consider Switzerland as part of Europe? The % of Mac compared to PC in CH is one of the highest of any country. Hope Apple doesn't forget us!!!

    37. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by blown.penguin · · Score: 1

      Well at least it is a start!

    38. Re:uk + fr + de != eu by eples · · Score: 1

      Strangely, the new Beastie Boys album is $15 in iTunes, and $10 at BestBuy, Circuit City and Target. Why wouldn't I just buy the CD, then?

      <joke>
      Because the CD comes with DRM, whereas iTunes doesn... oh wait.
      </joke>

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
  5. UK pricing by MikeS2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, kudos to them for not making us Britains pay 99p a track, like I'm sure some other companies would.
    We still pay the highest price, but I'm getting used to being shafted out of every penny I own here anyway.

    --
    120 characters should be enough for anybody
    1. Re:UK pricing by sjb2016 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bet you wish you joined the Euro don't ya? ;-)

      If Blair brings the EU Constitution up for a public referendum, you might want to vote yes. After all, why wouldn't you want France playing a major part in your defense or Germany helping decide how to lower unemployment?

    2. Re:UK pricing by proj_2501 · · Score: 2, Funny

      as long as the UK doesn't become the head of the recipe department

    3. Re:UK pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get to allofmp3.com and pay only 3 or 4 pence a track...

    4. Re:UK pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too right, we shouldn't. US food culture has become so pervasive here that we, like our American cousins, are turning into obese cardio-timebombs.

      Stereotypes ARE fun, aren't they? :-)

    5. Re:UK pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "britons" actually. Yeah, yeah, spelling flames are lame, but this is like misspelling your name.

    6. Re:UK pricing by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      oh and english food is SOOOO healthy.

      that would be why all the top-notch english restaurants serve other countries' cuisine, no? ;)

    7. Re:UK pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the top notch english restaurants sell `fusion`
      (cue reactor jokes from the spoff crowd)

    8. Re:UK pricing by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Well, kudos to them for not making us Britains pay 99p a track, like I'm sure some other companies would.
      We still pay the highest price, but I'm getting used to being shafted out of every penny I own here anyway.


      RTFA, it's 79p in Britain, not 99p.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    9. Re:UK pricing by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      he did rtfa. 79p = 1.19€

    10. Re:UK pricing by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      RTFP (Read The Fucking Post) he said kudos for *NOT* charging 99p a track. Go a little slower next time before you comment.

    11. Re:UK pricing by blown.penguin · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, someone else will come along and shaft you for the other 20p.

  6. Windows 98 + iTunes by JaF893 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I want to know is when iTunes will be released for Windows 98? Something tells me its never going to happen but surely it wouldn't be that difficult for apple to release iTunes for win 98?

    1. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by wankledot · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "but surely it wouldn't be that difficult for apple to release iTunes for win 98? "

      You do understand that the difference between XP/2K and 98 is pretty huge when it comes to underlying technology, right? Of course you don't, otherwise you wouldn't make a comment like that. Apple would much rather focus on making it work well on the platforms that people use now, vs. grandfathering in a 6 year old OS.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    2. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Latest version of QuickTime runs on 98, so I bet there's some significant reason why.

    3. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by falcon5768 · · Score: 0, Troll

      why would you ever want to still use 98, or worse use 98 ONLINE! Your just opening yourself up for a risk there.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    4. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Look - they won't even release the latest version of iTunes for their last OS (OS 9), so what makes you think it will be available for 98?

      Times have changed, and Netcraft^H^H^H^H^H^H^HApple has confirmed, Windows 98 is dying.

    5. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      You do understand that he was joking, right? Longtime slashdot tradition about asking when something will be available for Win98. Right up there with ...Profit! and Soviet Russia jokes.

    6. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Incidentally, the technology you're speaking of is background services. iTunes uses them to perform any task that might take processor time away from music playback...they use separate services for managing the iPod, downloading from the music store and burning CDs.

      It's kind of an unusual practice in the PC world...generally, services are used for things which run all the time and are related to maintenance of the system. So why does iTunes use services as opposed to threads? Well, I dunno. My theory is that contacting services is similar to contacting the background threads used in OS X, making it easier to adapt the existing codebase.

      Anyhow, if you're still using Windows 98, throw it away! God, that operating system is a piece of shit....Windows 2000/XP is worth the price just for the time saved from not having to reboot all the time or worry about bluescreening.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Including the fact that Windows 98 is no longer support by Microsoft.

    8. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also a matter of Hardware power. iTunes can be resource hungry, and most PC's with Win98 do not have the RAM to run iTunes. The small number of high-powered systems with Win98 don't really count.

      It's 2004, guys. Upgrade or lose it.

    9. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Those services are the most irritating thing ever. If I plan on burning a CD this session, I have to leave the service running, sucking down resources, from boot until I'm done with the CD. Something crashed and I killed the service? Got to reboot to burn a CD! What kind of system is that? If you're going to abuse services because you can't handle multithreading, at least start and stop the services around the times they're needed.

      I'm not even sure why they need to worry so much about keeping the music playing going ... I'm not sure about Macs, but PCs are capable of playing music files in the background in pretty much any kind of operating conditions.

      As for the stability of Win98, it works fine for me. All of my systems except my new laptop run it; they stay running for weeks at a time handling everything from office tasks to 3D and Photoshop to web serving. 2K/XP also run fine, but there's no real reason to upgrade if you've got something that works (particularly on older hardware)

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    10. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Did you just use 'resource hungry' to describe a media player? Time to get a new media player, methinks ... its a background task, to amuse you while you do real work, kind of like the little clock display ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    11. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, actually the services DECREASE the damage from a crash. If iTunes crashes, your music downloads still go through. If the Music Store crashes, your music still plays. I've never had to restart gearsecurity, and it DOES get shut down when it isn't in use. Furthermore, the resources it "sucks down" are paltry compared to Nero (20 meg) or DirectCD (14 meg). Anyhow, it's not that Apple can't HANDLE multithreading, just that they didn't. They chose to modularize the program. Which is kind of commendable...it's nice to know if I'm not burning a CD, it's not loaded into memory. Or that if I didn't use my iPod, I could turn off iPod support. Worthwhile when your music program wants to use 60+ meg.

      Anyhow, the reason they "worry" about the music is that iTunes, unlike many other jukebox-type apps, is built to handle massive amounts of music. I have 20,000 files in my database. Doing anything in that database -- adding to it, removing from it, even sorting it -- could take massive resources from the processor and lock the program, stopping the music. Adding a few thousand songs CAN cause the interface to freeze for a minute, but it doesn't stop the music, mostly due to some clever design including the threading model. Furthermore, iTunes is one of the few music programs I've seen that doesn't stop playing while a CD is spinning up on my old Athlon Gig. Although, it does bother me that it has to skip a second to update track info in a song that's currently playing...it doesn't do that on the mac.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    12. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH you have got to be kidding me, since when is telling the truth a troll, 98 is a VERY dangerious OS to use when going online simply because most of the major holes are NOT patched given its a end of life product!

    13. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by TheGavster · · Score: 1
      Which is kind of commendable...it's nice to know if I'm not burning a CD, it's not loaded into memory. Or that if I didn't use my iPod, I could turn off iPod support.

      The problem is, that it *is* loaded into memory when you're not burning a CD. And, if you don't set up the CD burning service to start with the system, you can't start it up later. You have to edit the startup list and reboot. I don't even own an iPod, and I have to leave that part running. The modularity is an interesting idea, its just done really poorly.

      Worthwhile when your music program wants to use 60+ meg.

      Weren't we just commenting on the "terrible" 20MB footprint of Nero?
      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    14. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I think they must have changed something for 4.5. Gearsec and iTunesHelper are no longer services...just the iPod Helper. I was wondering why I no longer saw its 8 meg presence in my system. So maybe this whole argument is moot.

      Windows swaps unused program memory to disc anyway, so most of that 50 gig is sitting on the hard drive when it's not used.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    15. Re:Windows 98 + iTunes by Code+Master · · Score: 1

      In fact, it does pause in OS X when updating track info in iTunes. My computer does it all the time, granted, it's a G4 400 which isn't top of the line, but it does happen.

      --
      The Code Master
  7. Tragedy of the commons by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So everybody and their brother has a music service these days. Obviously Apple is one of the better ones, but thats still a lot of competition, and a lot of marketing dollars that are going into stealing that competition from Apple.

    So I'm curious as to what sorts of predictions people have for when the market gets completely saturated with music services. Particularly with ones like OD2's which is a generic music store that they sell to lots of people which leads to a lot of the same stuff with different branding.

    Will we start seeing buyouts? Which ones do you think will go out of business?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Tragedy of the commons by efatapo · · Score: 1

      What on earth does that have to do with the tragedy of the commons?

    2. Re:Tragedy of the commons by blowdart · · Score: 1

      I don't think OD2 has to panic just yet. Considering how expensive Apple hardware is in the UK, OD2, with their Windows offering is aiming at a much larger audience (even if they are skipping out the iPod users). Add to that the fact that the labels all own part of OD2 and it's resonably secure right now.

      What would be more interesting would be what would happen if Apple allowed licensing of FairPlay. I got out of the on-line music business last year, but for 1.5 years my old, UK based, company where bashing our heads against FairPlay. Apple refused to talk to us, despite having all the labels lined up behind us, and already performing Windows and Real releases for them. Now if OD2 got iPod DRMed AACs in their store ....

    3. Re:Tragedy of the commons by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      Huh? iTunes/iTMS is a Windows as well as Mac application/store. Therefore OD2 are not advantaged in that area at all.

      More to the point, audio jukeboxes are what's driving this market, and the iPod just as much of a success in the UK as the states.

    4. Re:Tragedy of the commons by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Well, as I'm sure you're aware, the tragedy of the commons is about what happens when people in an area are all greedy about resources.

      In this case we're dealing with the online music service industry, and the limited number of resources would be the consumers.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Tragedy of the commons by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think, at the end of the day, victory will go to whoever can court the most artists. Music stores are really pimping their exclusives, and obviously it'll be harder for Apple to grab exclusives on SONY artists now that Connect is live. But Apple is doing something most labels aren't -- it's courting the independent labels and targeting specific markets with their excellent Jazz, Classical and Audiobooks sections. As such, they have an impressive NUMBER of songs, as well as an impressive DISTRIBUTION of artists. I am more likely to find what I am looking for on iTunes than on any other music service.

      However, iTunes does have a major problem, in that by allowing labels to control their songs on a song-by-song basis, a lot of labels have removed one track off an album just so you can't buy the whole thing for $9.99. Usually, this one track is a skit or something, but occasionally, they remove the #1 hit. Try finding Don McClean's "American Pie," for example. This is friggin' annoying...and a lot of other services (with, I'm sure, more slipshod toolsets) don't have this problem.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Tragedy of the commons by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well, considering all the other services make up about 20% of the market, I think that Apple is not worrying to much about it.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Tragedy of the commons by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the point someone has to bring up in every single ITMS story so far: Apple's primary source of income is not selling music, it's selling hardware and it's doing pretty well at it [sarcastic "beleagured" jokes go here]. The other stores seem to be barely profitable, if at all. If some global trend causes a slight downturn in the online music market, Apple (and Sony) will be able to keep going indefinitely thanks to their hardware business, and all the others will die off.

  8. Not much on there yet... by jaytay · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well it's launched but there's not much on there at the moment and there's an awful lot of "Partial albums" consiting of just one song. Hopefully they'll be adding more tracks over the coming weeks....

    1. Re:Not much on there yet... by in7ane · · Score: 1

      Better yet, for some reason some artist's pages have the prices in dollars. Which poses the question of whether the same catalogue will ultimately be available everywhere, and if not how (if at all) will the tracks not available to you locally show up.

      Also, I'm seeing a lot of 99 pence tracks out there... just saying.

    2. Re:Not much on there yet... by Sunspire · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The whole idea of having some content exclusive to only parts of the world is just stupid. It really shows the media companies are living in some bizarro alternate marketplace where a bigger audience is not preferable over control. Apple should try to bring everyone together in a single gigantic music hub. I want to listen to what the Japanese market listens to, the UK indie scene, Swedish garage bands, etc. Right now iTunes is simply your local music store in digital form but it could be so much more!

      Why not simply go the full mile? I want every music track, movie, tv-show and computer game ever produced, and I've got an attention span of about 30 seconds so you better hurry up. Sell to me dammit, I've got cash! It's the inevitable conlcusion to all of this, being able to queue up that one funny episode from your fav sitcom from Poland from the 80's, and having it instantly. The money the media companies could be making is a magnitude greater than what they get today, by truly selling on a global level absolutely everything they've got in their dusty archives and all future productions. It's ultimate distribution channel so if it can be digitized and sold it should.

      Sigh, something tells me they'd rather just work on DRM and new region encoding schemes.

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    3. Re:Not much on there yet... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I've looked at listings for 750 singles and every single one of them is 79p. Where is this motherload of 99p tracks located? Name 3.

    4. Re:Not much on there yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original referred to the Dido page (linked from the main page - but now updated with UK prices and a full artist page) and songs on the linked iMixes a lot of which were 99p. Looking through it it seems the store is actually being updated continuously right now. There are however still a lot of unloaded artists (try browsing through 'Rock' or probably any other genre).

      Searching for '0.99' has defeated me as well :(

    5. Re:Not much on there yet... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      I managed to get both a UK () and a US ($) price for the exclusive Darkness EP, and a different listing as well. Clicking on the text link gave me the four track uk version whilst the album picture gave me the 2 track US version.

      Fixed now, but I was wondering why I was seeing a 99 in there.

      Goblin

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    6. Re:Not much on there yet... by RogerWilco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're so right,

      In my cicle of friends I see a lot of people downloading not the films/series that are broadcasted on TV here in the Netherlands, but especially the stuff that's not on the local networks.
      Japaneese Anime, Brasilian soaps, indy music, episodes that have aired in the USA but not yet in europe, etc.

      They would pay for a legal alternative, but it just is not there.
      There are hundreds of niche markets that do not warrant nation wide broadcasting, but could make gold money in some bittorrent/iTunes combination, where increased demand would increase the number of nodes.
      DSL+Tivo-like product could do this in a very convenient way. The box would function as a seed for the last 20 things you downloaded next to the Tivo like behaviour.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    7. Re:Not much on there yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will never happen.

      Something tells me they would never want apple having that much control.

    8. Re:Not much on there yet... by Fennario · · Score: 1

      Trust me, unless your taste runs toward mindlessly repetitive, squeaky bubblegum J-pop, tragically comic hip-hop where Laker-jersey-garbed b-boys spout strings of Engrish punctuated by the occasional "Yo!" or highlights from last New Year's Japan-wide karaoke competition, you probably really don't want to listen to what the Japanese market listens to...

    9. Re:Not much on there yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Independent labels won't agree to the Apple deal as Apple refuse to pay them the same rate they major labels, even though indies were promised a level playing field when itunes launched.

  9. Exchange Rates by indie1982 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well i think we're getting a shitty deal in the UK when 0.99 euro converts to 65p and UK users have to pay 79p a track!

    1. Re:Exchange Rates by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      Serves the UK right for not joining the EMU (European Monetary Union).

      Still, the EMU countries pay too much compared to the US, €0,99 converts to aprox. $500 ;)

    2. Re:Exchange Rates by Animaether · · Score: 4, Insightful

      0.99 euro also converts to 1.19788 dollars.
      So just imagine how much you get shafted when compared to the U.S. ;)

      However, to be honest :
      1. You should be used to this, especially compared to the U.S. Software prices are in the order of 15-40% higher here. One might argue 'shipping costs' but fact of the matter is that the same price difference applies to 'download only' versions of the software.

      2. They needed a nice psychological number. 0.99 is one in many countries, but would put the price too high in the UK. 0.49 is another, but would put it too low. So go in the middle - 0.79

      Or, more likely :
      3. When the Euro was first instated, the exchange rate was 1 Euro = (almost) 79p.

    3. Re:Exchange Rates by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      It looks like UK customers get lumped together with Irish customers (sorry, Ireland!) so it's possible we might be able to pay in Euro.

      (Dons tinfoil hat) In fact - maybe it's all a cunning plan to encourage us to adopt the Euro! (No-one tell Kilroy Silk ;)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    4. Re:Exchange Rates by Rosyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't that 79p include the VAT as well? The 99cents price in the US does not include sales tax. You need to consider that before you start whining about the high price...

      Removing the 17.5% VAT, the price is about 67pence. Which is about $1.21. So you are complaining about a 22 cent difference... And do you think Apple should be adjusting the price when the exchange rate changes? Right now the dollar happens to be really low. What happens when it gets higher? Apple would have to raise the prices. Do you want that?

    5. Re:Exchange Rates by hattig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this isn't right in my book.

      I can accept that our price has VAT on top compared to the US pricing, but so do the EU prices! I can understand a bit of pessimism in terms of the exchange rate from Apple in case it goes back to where it used to be, but ... 99c -> 55p -> 65p inc. VAT. I could accept 70p a track (I assume that not many people like to charge 69p, heh). Apple are making ~12p (~20c) a track more off Brits. 10 million tracks is $2m more for them.

      When will we get the Euro so that we don't get ripped off in Europe like we always do? Quite why anyone wants to keep the pound and thus increased prices I don't know ... :mad:

    6. Re:Exchange Rates by hattig · · Score: 1

      Apple have a separate pricing agreement in Europe. Prices wouldn't be affected by the US$ exchange rate. Us Brits are bitching about why France and Germany yet again get the nice end of the deal, despite higher VAT rates.

    7. Re:Exchange Rates by makomk · · Score: 1
      (No-one tell Kilroy Silk ;)

      As most Slashdotters are American, I wonder how may will get that joke? (For the record, Kilroy-Silk is the best known member of the UK Independance Party, which is very anti-EU and now has several MEPs)

    8. Re:Exchange Rates by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      I think it's most likely option #2 - 0.79 is a nice psychological number. A previous poster, in a past post, mentioned that Canada and the US often have price-parity: ie. something selling for US$19.99 South of the border will sell for CDN$19.99 North of the border. It's not supply-and-demand - it's what people accept and remember. Oh, and the opportunity for big business to add a little margin on to everything!

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    9. Re:Exchange Rates by byolinux · · Score: 1

      He's also a former chat show host, who was fired from the BBC earlier this year for making anti-Arab comments in a Sunday taboid newspaper.

      His show was well known for starting with two bizarre and often unrelated questions, and you can create your own questions on the joke site http://www.robertkilroysilk.com/

    10. Re:Exchange Rates by Andy_R · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, it's a complete rip-off.

      Why would I buy a virtual CD for 7.99 when I can get the real thing for 8.99 including postage?

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    11. Re:Exchange Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, the British didn't want to join the Euro, because they wanted to be independent. So, now that you are, hope you are still happy with your independence!

    12. Re:Exchange Rates by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1
      Also the fact that you're getting 15$US/hour and we're gettin 15$CAN/hour.

      Salary in UK are HIGH, so I guess it scales accordingly.

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    13. Re:Exchange Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you save 1.00 (a few p less if you get a blank CD to burn it to as well), and you get it instantly and far more conveniently. duh

      Seriously man, you're only supposed to make comparisons like that when your favored option is the *cheaper* one.

    14. Re:Exchange Rates by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      No problem, I confirm -- just as long as we Irish don't have to pay the pound sterling price!

    15. Re:Exchange Rates by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Because it may be more likely that you would only want 3 songs from 5 different albums, making :
      15 * 0.79 = 11.85
      Rather than :
      5 * 8.99 = 44.95

      Sure, the album deal is relatively crap.. if you want the album only. If somebody doesn't care for the album / doesn't want to spend the time ripping to mp3 for their player / whatever, then saving 1 quid is valid enough.

    16. Re:Exchange Rates by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      :blink: I've always understood that U.S. salaries in dollars are greater than U.K. salaries in pounds (e.g. there was a /. article recently which mentioned a typical sysadmin salary of $60k - here I think it's closer to 40k; for a hard comparison, the national average wage is about 21k) but U.K. prices in pounds are about the same as U.S. prices in dollars.

    17. Re:Exchange Rates by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

      well if you'd just fscking join the euro already. you'd even be able to keep your beloved queen on your coins.

      though i have this theory that the uk is trying to decide which single currency to join - the dollar or the euro...

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    18. Re:Exchange Rates by Thundertje · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something that might explain this is the high VAT (Value Added Tax, or Belasting Toegevoegde Waarde in Dutch but you don't care about that :P).
      In The Netherlands 19% of what you pay for a normal consumer product is tax. And, correct me if I'm wrong here, in the US iirc the highest VAT-rate is about 4,6% in NewYork.
      So that explains the gross of the price differences.

    19. Re:Exchange Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true: software is cheaper in the states compared to europe, BUT
      we are talking content here. comparisons to dvd/cds would be appropriate. and here the thing turn:
      at least in germany, dvds/music cds are cheaper than in the us. for instance, the two first lotr dvds go for 7,97 each (=9,57 $) on amazon.de; whereas on amazon.com, they are 17,97!

    20. Re:Exchange Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.59 is a 'nice psychological number' too, as is 0.65...
      We in the UK have become too used to being overcharged, so I kind-of hope iTMS bombs, at least until Apple (or, more accurately, the record execs) lower their prices.

    21. Re:Exchange Rates by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

      They needed a nice psychological number. 0.99 is one in many countries....

      I could dig buying tunes at 0.99 pesos a pop -- rubles would be good too... Hell, I'd even pay for a legal address there in order to do it.

      --
      Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
    22. Re:Exchange Rates by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that 79p include the VAT as well? The 99cents price in the US does not include sales tax.

      I don't get taxed on my iTMS purchases. I know with the traditional online store model, they only have to charge you tax if they have a physical presence in the state where you live. So, since Apple doesn't have an Apple Store in the state of Kentucky, I don't pay taxes on the purchases directly from Apple. I assume the same thing applies with iTMS.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    23. Re:Exchange Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFLMAO

      I wish I had mod points!!!

      Brilliant!!

    24. Re:Exchange Rates by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      4.6% sounds awfully low for new york city. i thought it was closer to 8.25% after both the state and city sales taxes.

    25. Re:Exchange Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .99 euros is close to a dollar and .99 is a good number. It always seem people complain about british prices being higher. But keep in mind there's no VAT in USA and tax isn't included in price. And most of britain is more expensive that most of the US anyway.

    26. Re:Exchange Rates by illtud · · Score: 1

      Well i think we're getting a shitty deal in the UK when 0.99 euro converts to 65p and UK users have to pay 79p a track!

      Shitty, maybe, against EC trade rules, definitely. See last week's news on airline price ticket differences in the EU. The European Commission ruled that airlines could not price differentiate on tickets according to which country in the EU the customer lived in.

    27. Re:Exchange Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others have pointed out that 4.6% is too low. I've never lived in a state under 5%. It's also important to know the difference between a VAT and a sales tax. I pay 8+% tax on new CDs and 8+% on used CDs. Even used cars have huge sales taxes. This is one of the reasons America is more of a disposable culture than Europe.

  10. Just appears to be down by Sits · · Score: 1

    Akami appear to be having some DNS issues at the moment so it appears that apple.com, www.google.com, www.microsoft.com etc. are all down. If you have cached their ip addresses you should be able to reach them.

  11. No OS9 support by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't use it with my Apple operating system, and I'm expected to pay nearly 50% more than Americans?

    Seems like a huge own-goal to me, and I'm a Mac fanatic.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:No OS9 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after 3+ years of solid development and improvements, i would have thought self-claimed "Mac fanatic" would have moved onto OS X by now.

      don't you already pay 50% more for many things than the americans? cost of living, perhaps?

    2. Re:No OS9 support by byolinux · · Score: 1

      How come you're not on OS X yet? You've had years.

    3. Re:No OS9 support by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, in common with about 50% of mac users, at least 1 of my machines isn't up to spec for OSX, I don't fancy taking a 15-25% performance hit, repurchasing half my favourite software and doing without the other half that hasn't being ported yet, and I don't want to learn a whole new OS when I already have one that I know very well and is practically 100% stable.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    4. Re:No OS9 support by Durandal64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can't use if, you're not expected to pay jack-shit. Now get with the times and upgrade to OS X.

    5. Re:No OS9 support by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What machine do you still use that isn't up to spec? OS X runs just fine on my 400 MHz machines.....

      And it is really worth it, trust me.......

    6. Re:No OS9 support by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Awwww. OSX has been out long enough that if a piece of software hasn't been moved over, the company that owns it doen't see the value, and it will probably never be ported. There are years of old machines that can run OSX, you can buy one used for pretty cheap. Go spend a little money on something faster, and that performance hit won't even be noticeable. And then you can stop living in the past, talking about the good ol' days, and shaking your fist at all the kids zooming by on their fancy G5's.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    7. Re:No OS9 support by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That's your choice based on the pros and cons. But don't then whinge when you can't run the latest software. That's one of the cons that you decided you could cope with.

    8. Re:No OS9 support by outZider · · Score: 1

      Interesting Mac Fanatic that still hasn't moved to OS X. You are aware that it came out years ago, yes?

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    9. Re:No OS9 support by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      I take your point, but I'm not whining about something that makes much/any use of the new features of OSX, I'm whining about Apple choosing to give better support to Microsoft's OSes than their own.

      The decision not to offer the iTunes store to 50% of Mac users has nothing to do with technical issues and a lot to do with trying to force people to pay for a new OS they don't all need.

      Oh, and to add in a reply to another post, I have a pre-usb G3/333 as my home machine, which can't run any OSX releases after ADB support was dropped (which seems to means the stable ones!)

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    10. Re:No OS9 support by jaysones · · Score: 1

      iTunes doesn't run in WinME, which is the same age as OS 9, not to mention that they haven't made a dime off you in many, many years. The previous poster was right: you're making a trade-off and this is one of the incentives Apple is holding out to you. Make the plunge- OS X is great.

    11. Re:No OS9 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      400Mhz? Hell, OSX runs just fine on my 233Mhz G3.

      In point of fact it runs significantly faster for my usage patterns than OS9 used to. (I tend to multitask a lot, which OSX handles _far_ better).

    12. Re:No OS9 support by Carthag · · Score: 1

      I run OS X on my G3/350 with 384 megs or ram. It runs pretty damn well, considering the craptacular machine. The only times I run into massive swapping is when opening huge iPhoto galleries and such.

      My parents are running OS X on a rev B iMac 233 with 256 megs of ram. That is too slow for me, but it works for them.

    13. Re:No OS9 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, that's what I tell all these dudes running Win98. can't they just upgrade to the times and use XP instead. sheesh, the user's of computers today

    14. Re:No OS9 support by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're either clueless or excessively whiny. Supporting OS 9 would add a huge amount of extra work, and basically no benefit. It is not easy to make applications, especially applications based on UNIXy HTML-rendering libraries (hint hint), run on both OS 9 and OS X without looking and working like crap on OS X. People who still run OS 9 are almost all people who don't spend money on their computers, more or less by definition (if they spent money, they wouldn't still be running OS 9). Apple rarely makes software that runs on older OSes. They dropped support for System 7 in most of their apps after OS 8 was out for a while, and they dropped OS 8 after OS 9 was out for a while. They don't even support OS X 10.0 with iTunes.

      Your G3/333 will run OS X just fine. You can run Jaguar on it, which isn't the newest, but hey, it's a very old computer. Jaguar was the first really good, stable, and fast OS X release, so you should have no trouble with that compromise.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    15. Re:No OS9 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Many times, you don't have to repurchase the softwares. They run fine in the Classic environment.

      You don't have to learn a whole new OS. Much of your OS 9 skills can still be useful in OS X. You may need to get used to the new keyboard shortcuts, though. And the stability thing? OS 9 is like Windows compared to OS X. It seems you have never given OS X a try or a chance. You also gain much more in productivity with the preemptive multi-tasking and all the buzzwords of modern OS.

      OS X does open up your software library. Much of OSS that are available to linux and *NIX and Windows are available for OS X as well. It's a good time to be a Mac user.

    16. Re:No OS9 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be happy Apple moved on to OSX.

      The Apple community is much better for it.

      Here when we release a product we have to test it on WinXP, Win98SE, Win2k, WinME, Win95 & god forbid WinNT4.

      Along with all the slews of IE and WMP.

      Moving to one OS is a good thing

    17. Re:No OS9 support by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      The key is LOTS of RAM. That's what I've heard.

    18. Re:No OS9 support by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your insults Mr Troll.

      If iTunes is "based on UNIXy HTML-rendering libraries" why was it OS9 only up to about version 2?

      As for "People who still run OS 9 are almost all people who don't spend money on their computers", I wonder how these people ended up with Apple computers, I thought apple has been continually criticised for it's high prices? Isn't it more likely that they bought Apples for OS9's legendary simplicity?

      Did you miss the part of my earlier post where I pointed out that my favourite apps hadn't been ported and will face a 15-25% performance hit when they are? Maybe I could run an early buggy version of OSX, but why should I pay for that when I can run a stable mature version of OS9 that I already know well?

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    19. Re:No OS9 support by JamieF · · Score: 1

      The poster is probably talking about the iTunes Music Store functionality. I upgraded to OS X pretty early so I didn't keep track of iTunes on OS 9, so I could be wrong about that. But the music store UI isn't just plain old HTML and probably uses some new thing that is Cocoa-only.

      The conspiracy to force you to upgrade is probably more like a conspiracy not to spend tons of money backporting libraries to OS 9 just so the software can work. I'm sure if they could check a checkbox and build an OS 9 version of the latest iTunes with no effort, they would. There are plenty of other reasons to upgrade to OS X.

  12. The release date will be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    when you upgrade to Win 2000+ :)

  13. Bah... by MouseR · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...still not available for the 53rd state: Canada.

    1. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the 51st and 52nd states are? Answers on a postcard, please.

    2. Re:Bah... by Brain+Stew · · Score: 1

      What the 51 and 52 considering the current union only has 50!

      --
      "Here's a spoiler: You're will die alone."-Triumph the Insult Comic Dog
    3. Re:Bah... by Brain+Stew · · Score: 1

      What are 51st and 52nd considering there are currently only 50 states in the union. I realize what you said was a joke, but please use the correct number (51).

      --
      "Here's a spoiler: You're will die alone."-Triumph the Insult Comic Dog
    4. Re:Bah... by 955301 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The 51st and 52nd states are Ignorance and Confusion, and they contain over half the population.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    5. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      53rd? Are you counting Iraq and Afghanistan?

    6. Re:Bah... by imadork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The 51st state is Afghanistan, and the 52nd is Iraq. Haven't you been paying attention?

    7. Re:Bah... by DLWormwood · · Score: 2, Funny
      the 53rd state

      Okay, I'll bite...

      Assuming that Puerto Rico is the 51st "State," what's 52nd?

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    8. Re:Bah... by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      The 51st is how the United Kingdom is jokingly referred to. I'm not sure about the 52nd though.

    9. Re:Bah... by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      He probably counted Iraq and Afganistan...

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    10. Re:Bah... by ctr2sprt · · Score: 2, Funny
      We number states chronologically; so the 28th State (Texas) is the 28th to join the Union. This is a bit of a problem for your argument, since Canada has clearly been a member of the Union longer than Afghanistan and Iraq. In fact, it's probably older than Alaska and Hawaii (#48 is Arizona in 1912).

      So the order goes: Arizona, Canada, Alaska, Hawaii, Afghanistan, Iraq. Canada is the 49th State. Iraq is the 53rd.

      That's right. Not only did I take the time to reply to a troll, I did some research too.

    11. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      51st state is the UK, this has been a phrase coined since the mid 60's AFAIK, due mainly to the language being the same and a large presence of US troops and bombers here throughout the Cold War. It possibly came about as a result of the UK:USA pact, Echelon, Fylindales EW System, etc. etc.

      I have no idea what the 52nd state is, but I'd assume it to be some country or other that recently got invaded...

    12. Re:Bah... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Funny

      Britain and Israel.

    13. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 51st and 52nd states are Ignorance and Confusion
      I believe you are refering to Texas and California.

    14. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To paraphrase Red Foreman for you 70s show fans out there and defend the US:

      Your ass is going to be the 54th state when I put my foot in it.

    15. Re:Bah... by zhiwenchong · · Score: 1

      Canada has 10 provinces and 3 territories. Some of the provinces are bigger than your average U.S. state, both in area and population.

      So in reality, Canada could well be the 51st through 63rd states.

      Slow day eh....

    16. Re:Bah... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Puerto Rico, of course!

    17. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guam.

    18. Re:Bah... by imadork · · Score: 1
      That's right. Not only did I take the time to reply to a troll, I did some research too.

      Well, I guess that troll was a success, then? I like this trolling thing, maybe I should do it more often...

    19. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Texas and Florida.

    20. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! We're the 53rd State here in teh UK - you can be the 54th ;-)

    21. Re:Bah... by jgerry · · Score: 1

      District of Columbia?

    22. Re:Bah... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Are you all begging for the US to invade Canada? I'm sure we could arrange something.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    23. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod down. Canada is very much independent.

    24. Re:Bah... by AcornWeb · · Score: 1

      Israel. At least it is in the Middle East. :-) Do you know how much support the US government gives them? It's on the order of $4 Billion / year in arms, etc.

      --
      Your Windows PC is my other computer.
    25. Re:Bah... by MouseR · · Score: 1

      The 51st and 52nd states are Ignorance and Confusion, and they contain over half the population.

      My theory on humanity has always been that half are idiots and the rest are hypocrites.

      I'm from the third category.

      More seriously though, it's amusing to see that a honest no-troll error like "53rd" generated as much troll-response. Mea culpa.

      But hey. I couldn't name half the state names! For me, only a few are important. Like Delaware and Adirondack.

      (Yes, that's bait! Eh!)

    26. Re:Bah... by norweigiantroll · · Score: 1

      California's population is about the same as Canada's.

    27. Re:Bah... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Absolutely wrong!

      The 51st state is Denial, and I happen to be a resident.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    28. Re:Bah... by Araneas · · Score: 1

      Yes but if all of Canada were to become one state Texas and Alaska would have to institute state wide free Viagara to compensate. Canada is a BIG place.

  14. too expensive? by Errtu76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    99 eurocents per song might seem expensive. But how many of you haven't bought a cd because you liked some songs, only to find out later you really don't like the rest of them? Then the option of legally owning the few songs you *do* like isn't so bad.

    Btw, is it illegal to download the cdcover of the full cd if you bought only a couple of tracks?

    1. Re:too expensive? by lennart78 · · Score: 1

      This hardly ever happens to me. I don't know if that is because I rarely buy any mainstream cd's, because I read a few (independant) reviews before I buy anything, or if I have a magical 6th sense.

      Fact is: There is a lot of crap music on the market, to which I wouldn't even listen if they PAID me 99c p/song...

    2. Re:too expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the cd cover has been scanned in by iTunes it will come included with every single you purchase. Of my 878 purchased songs I have seen maybe 1 that was missing the cover.

    3. Re:too expensive? by holt · · Score: 1

      The M4P files that come from the iTMS include the cover art. So you don't need to download it separately. If you go to File->Print (I'm on Windows here at work, unfortunately... I'm assuming it's similiar on the Mac) there is the option to print a CD jewel case insert as well. (Along with song and album listings.)

  15. HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Screw that. Try allofmp3.com. I pay 1 to 2 cents per meg, don't have to deal with annoying DRM, and choose whether I want files in mp3, ogg, wma, aac, whatever, even lossless FLAC, and the bitrate I want. I haven't used filesharing since I found it.

    1. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by indie1982 · · Score: 1

      Damn right! Except Halifax changed my Switch card to a Visa Debit so now when I use that with sites not in the UK it gets processed by PayPal USA and i get charged a 1.50 conversion fee. Bastards!

    2. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by chrisgeleven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And it is as legal as the black market. Just what I want. I like getting visits from men in dark suits after downloading 100 songs from Russia that are 100% legal. Sign me up!

    3. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by Njovich · · Score: 1

      Has it already been made clear wether that service is legal? Last time I checked it wasn't according to the labels. If you don't do it legal, you might as well just download it from your favorite P2P network, the assortment is much better there...

    4. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      how does that operate so cheap? Anyone?

    5. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      allofmp3.com has already been in operation for quite some time. If it's illegal as the labels claim(labels seem to claim quite alot these days...) why haven't they been taken down?
      I know that they are located in Russia, but still,it's not like Russia is a 3rd world country or anything. They have their own record labels who surely would have taken them down if it's illegal.

    6. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by wfberg · · Score: 2, Informative

      how does that operate so cheap? Anyone?

      They're based in Russia, which does not have a separate copyright on downloads, so they get by on the kind of license that your local radio station would have (although some claim they don't even have, others claim they don't need, that licence), which is vastly cheaper seeing as the Russian market won't put up with US/EU levels of licensing prices (with less to be made from advertising).

      This is also why the RIAA have their panties in a bunch over digital radio - imagine simply recording CD quality tunes off the airwaves, with the radio stations only chipping in a cent per minute (or whatever they pay. Not $.99 per listener per track, that's for sure).

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    7. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by in7ane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, don't worry so much. If you are afraid that "men in dark suits" will visit you after "downloading 100 songs" you clearly have problems and should probably seek professional help...

    8. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      So, is it legal for someone in the UK/US to download, and when the rozzers come knocking, point to the fact that you downloaded it.

    9. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by RussGarrett · · Score: 1

      Allofmp3.com is not legal. Although they do claim to pay the Russian rights organisation the correct fee, there are some independent-label artists on there who are not signed to a performing-rights organisation, and are still not getting paid.

      So by using allofmp3.com, you could be screwing the smaller artists even more.

    10. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by radja · · Score: 1

      I'm 100% sure it's legal in the Netherlands.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    11. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by Woy · · Score: 2, Informative
      And it is as legal as the black market. Just what I want. I like getting visits from men in dark suits after downloading 100 songs from Russia that are 100% legal. Sign me up!

      While it may seem inconceivable that in comparision with an american service the russians may provide better and cheaper products, and, most of all, a far better user experience without DRM, it is now the truth. The utter stagnation that american law has imposed on american development has brought these results, and trust me, these are just the beggining. I have yet to see a single reason why this russian service is illegal. It may seem shocking that the russians can provide so much more for so much less, and how can it be legal if itunes has to charge much more to be legal? Well, my dear americans, to whom i always hope for the best, you kinda dug this hole yourselves.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    12. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Seriously, don't worry so much. If you are afraid that "men in dark suits" will visit you after "downloading 100 songs" you clearly have problems and should probably seek professional help...

      Isn't that pretty much what the major record labels and "industry associations" want people to worry about? Back in my computer retail days, I remember one poor kid that was on the verge of tears about the possibility that the jackbooted thugs might hunt him down for pirating a few games.

      He was in a very, very tiny minority. Most people didn't give a crap. Based on what I experienced, I think the major labels are managing to hurt even the independents through their belligerence and underhanded tactics, both toward artists and customers. It reached a point where I got the impression that people wanted to hurt the labels, in retaliation for real or perceived grievances.

      It will take a very long time for the record industry to rebuild the bridges it torched, and I suspect it will never look the same afterward. I hope that means the cartels will disappear...

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    13. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by wfberg · · Score: 1

      It's legal in The Netherlands, Canada (landmark rulings) and probably a few other European countries. UK, I'm not sure, I think they're pretty much into the Euro-DMCA; as for the US - not legal.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    14. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by dismentor · · Score: 1

      At the very least it gives one plausible deniability. I don't know if that counts for anything in copyright cases though.

    15. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by dismentor · · Score: 1

      Oh Dear, I seem to have been labouring under the assumption that the only people who can decide on matters of law are the judiciary, not our new corporate overlords.

      Until such time as suit is brought against AllofMP3.com and it is decided against them; I will continue to believe that it is legal.

    16. Re:HOW expensive again? Check out allofmp3.com by Swedentom · · Score: 1
      --
      Sig Nature
  16. APPLE COMPUTERS ARE REALLY EXPENSIVE IN EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 2Ghz G5 costs 2,799 GBP (Stupid slashcode won't support pound signs), which translates to over $5,500 USD! Meanwhile, I recently bought a 3Ghz machine for just 500! Apple is simply too expensive in europe. No one I know uses one, except for the lab of old imacs at college.

    1. Re:APPLE COMPUTERS ARE REALLY EXPENSIVE IN EUROPE by tdemark · · Score: 1

      Stupid slashcode won't support pound signs

      Stupid AC must be illiterate.

      At the Apple Store (International, UK), the Dual G5/2GHz is 1,849 GBP (1,573 GBP excl VAT).

      The 2.5GHz is about 350 more.

      - Tony

  17. Answer, a lot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple users have been shown to be better educated, wealthier and more artistic creatures than PC users.

    In other words, more European :) In an unrelated note, WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF EUROPE?! Sweden and Ireland are where i live, and nothings here!

    1. Re:Answer, a lot. by TheGavster · · Score: 1
      Apple users have been shown to be better educated, wealthier and more artistic creatures than PC users.


      Well, they'd kind of have to be to be Mac users, wouldn't they? Particularly given the price quotes above for Macs in the UK (its as if someone just changed the dollar sign out for pounds and called it a conversion!)
      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:Answer, a lot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple users have been shown to be better educated, wealthier and more artistic creatures than PC users.

      This is not a troll, not a flamebait, just an honest fact that happens to make an interesting correlation:

      Homosexual individuals have been shown to be better educated, wealthier and more artistic creatures than heterosexuals.

      Coincidence?

  18. dont support it by Dr.Knackerator · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not ideal (99c is about 55p) but it's better pricing than expected. I for one will be signing up to use it.

    I can't understand why anybody would want to support price gouging. Unless a swift and painful message is delivered to them NOW, the price will not get any cheaper. And in 20 years time we will have another investigation into why our prices are so high compared to other places which will again (like CDs) do nothing about it.

    1. Re:dont support it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't understand the complaints about price based on currency conversion. Do you really want the price you pay to change from second to second? Presumably if the dollar continues to strengthen vs the euro and the euro returns to parity or sub-parity, nobody will be offering to give money back because they are getting an unfair deal.

      >>
      It's not ideal (99c is about 55p) but it's better pricing than expected. I for one will be signing up to use it.

      I can't understand why anybody would want to support price gouging. Unless a swift and painful message is delivered to them NOW, the price will not get any cheaper. And in 20 years time we will have another investigation into why our prices are so high compared to other places which will again (like CDs) do nothing about it.

    2. Re:dont support it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's APPLE and APPLE is cool.

    3. Re:dont support it by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      That 99c does not include sales tax, the 79p does. That leaves a little over a 20c difference between the two in terms of price.

      Considering the volatile nature of currency and that they aren't going to update it based on those conversion rates and that the dollar is at a low right now, this seems reasonable, hardly "price gouging."

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  19. Re:Slashdot censors Firefox 0.9 release by REBloomfield · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Probably because it's a dupe?

  20. Now add 15% VAT... by mccalli · · Score: 1
    Not quite so bad now, right? Seems like the base price of a track is roughly the same, and much of the extra is due to our high sales tax.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Now add 15% VAT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except most of Europe has higher sales tax.

      There's rumours that the iTMS Europe is located in Luxembourg due to the slightly lower tax rate there. It's still above 15% - IIRC, 17%?

      So there's that difference gone.

  21. A worthy effort by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But Apple can't compete with free (and no DRM). Significantly, the BPI (British Phonographic Industries) haven't used the same bully-boy tactics as the RIAA yet, so British P2P users can make their hard drives available with impunity.

    I wonder to what extent Apple's business model anticipates a similar crackdown on this side of the pond?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:A worthy effort by cowscows · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think most of the iTMS customers are being driven to the store by the RIAA's lawsuits. All along, there have been lots of people saying that they downloaded music from P2P because it was convenient, and they only did it illegally because there was no decent legal alternative.

      Apple's business model is to make things even more convenient, allow people to be honest, and offer it at a price that's not much worse than free.

      Sure, there are still plenty of people out there just downloading whatever they can find for nothing, just as there are people who shoplift in brick and mortar stores. But that doesn't mean there's no money to be made in selling stuff.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:A worthy effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one word: iPod.

      for that reason alone, iTMS will be competitive.

    3. Re:A worthy effort by Wanderer2 · · Score: 1

      The BPI have been saying for some time that it was pointless to threaten P2P music-swappers with lawsuits without first offering them an online alternative.

      So now there are some half-decent services being launched in the UK, watch this space...

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    4. Re:A worthy effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Apple's culture, they pretty much count on the honesty of the users. You don't see outrageous software activations on Apple products. You don't see draconian DRMs. They argue to RIAA that people _wants_ to buy and not infringe. I guess Mac culture tends to see the positives in people.

      It's a generalization, but I think there is the truth in that.

    5. Re:A worthy effort by Salsaman · · Score: 1

      And what about the Linux users ? Apple don't make an iTunes client for Linux. How is the growing population of Linux users supposed to use this service then ?

  22. iTunes or All of MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why choose iTunes/Sony/Rhapsody/Walmart over AllOfMp3?

    Though AllOfMP3.com is a legally questionable operation, so are the tactics of the RIAA's, whom iTMS users are supporting with every cent they give to the store. You're screwing artists either way, whether it's through P2P or funding the RIAA through iTMS/Apple. If you really want to send your money to an artist, go to one of their shows, buy their merchandise, have one of your friends give'em a listen.

    By choosing AllOfMP3.com over Apple's store, you can do the following:

    -NOT support the RIAA or their questionable methods of operation
    -NOT support a company that works with the RIAA to further their influence and funnel your money into the RIAA's coffers (for a list of other companies and people not to buy music from, please visit here)
    -NOT support the use of the iTMS' proprietary DRM which not only limits what media player you want to play your music on (Most people prefer listening to their music on Winamp intead of being forced to use iTunes to listen to music they paid for), but what digital audio portable you want to use to listen to your music as well. AllofMP3.com and several other services (Audiolunchbox, Bleep, Magnatune) do not treat you like a criminal for buying their music, nor impose limits on how you wish to listen to it.
    -CHOOSE what format you want your music encoded in, instead of being stuck with vanilla 128 AACs, with Apple's proprietary and limiting DRM tacked on.

    1. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by Viperlin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      why was this modded down, it's not trollish, a little emotional but a valid comment

    2. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by base3 · · Score: 1

      The Apple faithful can tolerate no criticism of Apple. Fortunately, they only have mod points (unlimited in the case of the editors) and not whips.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    3. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was parent modded as a troll just because it's AGAINST buying from iTunes? God forbid someone have an opinion and facts to support it.

    4. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is not a troll, but in fact very informative. Bring back the parent!

    5. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Surely people are not going to use Napster or iTunes when Allofmp3.com is available?

      Have these people looked at the cost using of allofmp3.com?

      No contest surely?

    6. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You also choose

      - NOT to support artists, who have no say in whether or not their music is on allofmp3 and get little to no money in return

      - NOT to support change in the US by saying "hey, I am willing to buy music for a fair price," but instead demanding an impossibly low price.

      - NOT to support the concept of copyright, which is all artists have to protect them from rampant piracy. It's not just there to make corporations money, you know...there are artists whose work is so heavily pirated they've basically become unviable (several hip-hop acts come to mind).

      - CHOOSE to support a black market whose "legality" is based on a crooked organization who has assumed control over music it had no part in making and plays no part in supporting. You may think that it should be legal, but in my eyes it's no better than KaZaa.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by bullitB · · Score: 1

      If you really wanted to avoid entanglement with the RIAA, just download the song from a P2P network. Allofmp3.com isn't really playing fair, if you ask me. Russia doesn't even respect copyrights from before 1973, so if you download the Beatles, all of the commissions from the sales on AllOfMP3.com are going straight to ROMS (Russian RIAA). At least on iTunes the artists will be getting something.

    8. Re:iTunes or All of MP3? by Dave114 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Russia doesn't even respect copyrights from before 1973

      Wasn't the original copyright period in the US something like 14 years (with a possible 14 year renewal)?

      Seems like its been more than 28 years since 1973.

  23. Language Issues by coolsva · · Score: 4, Insightful

    iTunes Europe might not be as successful as in the US since not all people listen to music in English. Until iTunes finds a way to customize the selection based on geography, I for one would not be willing to navigate through the site searching for my music.
    Also, many artists have their recordings in multiple languages (like Eros/Laura in italian/spanish/portugese etc). Would be interesting to see how they unify or resolve the cultural differences

    1. Re:Language Issues by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      ISTR that some huge percentage of Americans have Spanish as their first language, and I bet they don't ALL listen to Ricky Martin ;-)

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:Language Issues by el_womble · · Score: 1

      Why split it by geography? Apple prides itself on using unicode (almost throughout). Having access to the whole site and being able to search for any artist, in any country in any language - with clean or explicit lyrics. Not thats a service thats (almost) worth 0.79 a song!

      --
      Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    3. Re:Language Issues by Fulkkari · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There have been non-English music on iTunes since it's launch. Then why would it be a problem now? They will most likely do the same thing they are doing now; they append " (Spanish Version)" or Italian or whatever to the song name.

      If you want to search for Spanish songs by some artist, do a simple "Artist name Spanish" search, and you should get all the Spanish songs by the artist.

      What was the problem, again?

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    4. Re:Language Issues by mehgul · · Score: 2, Informative

      iTMS France has mostly french artists from the little I've seen yet. The selection is already customized.

    5. Re:Language Issues by matticus · · Score: 1

      Where I live, many people do not speak a word of English, however the radio is almost entirely English songs. People will be singing a song in English, and you can try to speak to them and they have no idea what it's saying, just how it sounds. Hearing two teenagers singing "HOO LET ZE DOGS OUT WOO WOO" still leaves me in stitches.

    6. Re:Language Issues by ugauaauag · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should hear Americans sing "La Bamba" or "99 Luft Balloons"...

    7. Re:Language Issues by fpillet · · Score: 1

      iTunes is already "localized". Depending on the country you access it from, you get a selection of international & local artists. Plus they show an interface localized to the customer country's language.

    8. Re:Language Issues by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      god, noone should hear anyone sing 99 luft balloons EVER

  24. ]:3} by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    . . . and so the great iTunes goodness spreads through out the land, preparing the world for the great Apple overlords coming . . .

  25. A truly global Internet... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    So now are they singing, "Michael Hasselhof uber alles?"

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:A truly global Internet... by larien · · Score: 1

      Could be worse, could be "David Hasselhoff uber alles". He is rather popular in Germany, after all...

    2. Re:A truly global Internet... by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      what's interesting is he's currently making a rap album with ice-t, being released under the name Hassel the Hoff

    3. Re:A truly global Internet... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Not Hizzle the Hoff?

    4. Re:A truly global Internet... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      That's a farce. Ice-T was on Conan this week debunking that. An interviewer asked him if he could make anyone rap. Ice-T said, "Sure for enough money." The interviewer then asked if he could make David Hasselhoff rap. Ice-T replied, "Yeah, for about 5 million dollars I'd sign him to my label and put out his album." The interviewer then asked what his name would be and Ice-T said, "Hassel the Hoff." Somehow that got distorted from a hypothetical joke to being an acutal project.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  26. Re:Slashdot censors Firefox 0.9 release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After a Mozilla Foundation member criticizes Rob Malda

    When was this? Link required!

  27. is apple.com slashdotted?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UH. apple's page doesnt' load for me in safari, mozzila or anything, though the muusic store seems to work okay. did something go horribly wrong in the launch of itms europe?

  28. Bad news for Apple by gowen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    None of the independent labels are signing up for iTunes; and that means the vast bulk of their service will be made up by the commercial schlock the majors are trying to cram down peoples throats. (Unlike the US, non-major labels are a big chunk of the UK CD market).

    No Franz Ferdinand? No White Stripes? No Dizzee Rascal?

    No thanks, Steve.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Bad news for Apple by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Bad news for Apple by KirkH · · Score: 1

      All three of those are available at the U.S. iTunes store. So you can probably assume they'll show up in the UK before too long.

    3. Re:Bad news for Apple by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Are you sure White Stripes are non-RIAA?

    4. Re:Bad news for Apple by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of the audience seems to be quite willing to have commercial schlock crammed down its throats, so that's a good business plan. Remember that Apple is trying to make money here, not join the Slashdot anti-RIAA crusade. Maybe as the store grows ever more popular, whatever reason the independents have for not signing up will be worked around.

    5. Re:Bad news for Apple by cens0r · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that band's are on differernt labels in different countries. In the US the white stripes are on V2 which is an RIAA member, however in the UK they are distributed via XL, which is not. Franz Ferdinand is signed to Domino records which is safe, but Sony distributes them in the US. A band like belle and sebastian might be on EMI/Virgin, Rough Trade, or Matador depeding on the country of purchase. The problem with indie labels is that only the biggest (Matador, Sub-Pop, etc) have good enough distribution to handle a band world wide, so a major lable almost always is involved in a few of the countries.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    6. Re:Bad news for Apple by 1in10 · · Score: 1

      The white stripes: bmg - a major label.
      Franz Ferdinand: sony - a major label.

      Oh well, 1 out of 3 aint bad! ;)

      Maybe the major labels are a bigger part of the market than you think. Many so called "indie" musicians are signed on RIAA affiliated labels.

    7. Re:Bad news for Apple by gowen · · Score: 1
      The white stripes: bmg - a major label.

      Franz Ferdinand: sony - a major label.
      Only in America. As I point out elsewhere, they're both on Indie labels in Europe. See the word "Europe" there in the headline of the whole story? Understand yet?
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  29. ...or indeed, 17.5% VAT. by mccalli · · Score: 1
    Oops. Showing my age a bit. I still think of VAT as 7.5% let alone anything else...

    Chjeers,
    Ian

  30. Re:Slashdot censors Firefox 0.9 release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really?

    a) I don't see any other such story listed
    b) When was the last time that bothered any of slashdot's editors?

  31. Welcome to International Business by alexhmit01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If any of you follow financial news, companies are reporting additional gains from exchange rates, and some years report losses...

    Prices are set in local markets based upon localized demand and competition (limited monopoly pricing power from brand, even in a relatively competitive market), etc.

    Right now, it is cheaper for Germans to buy German cars sold in America and reimport them, because even with the cost of shipping the car from the states, the Euro is so strong on the dollar that it results in the importing the American made German car is cheaper.

    Companies set prices (usually with local subsidiaries because of assinine international tax laws) in each country. Many companies will engage in "hedging" with the currency derivative market, because they aren't in the business of currency speculation (although if it should work out in the long run, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, then paying the commissions on those trades isn't economically intelligent, but it's important for hitting quarterly/annual numbers, joys of public accounting).

    However, the price will be set in the European market based upon the prevailing price there. However, that is in part because of Apple's limited "monopoly" pricing power (note, this is NOT monopoly a la anti-trust, it's in a competitive market with highly similiar substitute goods, like CDs, pirated music, etc.), but only Apple sets the price for iTMS downloads.

    One of the things that the Internet and digital transfers has the potential to do is destroy regionalized pricing, at least within the English (and then Spanish, etc.) speaking world. In that scenario, Apple could set prices in each store based upon local trends, but consumers could buy from whichever store TODAY's currency price makes most beneficial. That is great for consumers, but lousy for corporate profits (then they ALWAYS lose on the currency fluctuation, because the business goes to whatever is cheapest that day).

    However, a Euro price that isn't identical to US pricing with TODAY'S rate of exchange makes sense. The Euro is up something like 30% on the Dollar in the past 12 months. If that trend reverses, and 1 $ = 1 E again, then a Euro price of 55 cents would devastate Apple. The Euro was established at a price level to make the nominal exchange of Euros to Dollars approx. 1:1, which would obviously fluctuate.

    Consumers in general are more interested in pricing in their local currency then international pricing. Although the Internet has changed things SLIGHTLY, in general, most consumers don't engage in International trade, but rather buy from an organization that has imported the products for them. Hence Amazon has localized businesses, Apple set up local Apple AND now iTMS to price in the local currency. Cars are priced in each local market.

    However, the free flow of information will reduce that ability over time, which is a good thing, but you shouldn't be shocked that it isn't instant.

    Alex

    1. Re:Welcome to International Business by furball · · Score: 0

      Good lord, this is perhaps one of the most succint and correct analysis and explanation of currency and local trade I've read.

    2. Re:Welcome to International Business by FosterKanig · · Score: 1

      Dear Sir,
      Unfortunately your post was well thought out, insightful, clear and concise. Because of that we are going to have to revoke your Slashdot membership. Sorry.

  32. Re:Slashdot censors Firefox 0.9 release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't own a tinfoil hat, but maybe its time to get one. That's freaky. And its completely broken the site; if you try to change the viewing options or anything it directs you to a list of discussions, which have broken links from them.

  33. Higher prices in the UK are easily explained... by homgran · · Score: 0

    The reason we pay more than the exchange rates imply is because of the import duties involved. Wait a minute...

  34. Significance of price points by wombatmobile · · Score: 2

    Well i think we're getting a shitty deal in the UK when 0.99 euro converts to 65p and UK users have to pay 79p a track!

    The pricing strategy is doubtless based on price point psychology rather than exchange rate parity.

    Capitalism is like that. The product manager seeks to optimize revenue but his/her choices are constrained by a granularity imposed by price point psychology.

    Of course, this phenomenon leads to an obvious argument in favor of common currency in geographically and commercially related regions. That is probably a whole other topic, but one which becomes increasingly relevant when considering sub 100 priced commodities.

  35. What about CD costs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in Germany last month, CD prices were upwards of 20 Euro each. Now, you might argue that you're getting gouged on CD prices too but the per-song pricing seems to be in line with what you're already paying for CDs.

  36. Re:Who cares? by midifarm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Stop people from buying crappy music and going to see their shows and you'll get better artists signed!

    Peace

  37. That Expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can they dare to demand us to pay that much for this service:
    - No physical support delivered (By definition)
    - We have to do all the work for them
    - They are killing intermediate
    - More expensive than a full album in Promotion...

    For such a price the only reason to use this service is the fear of the trial (for downloading on a P2P network)... even in europe...

    Sorry for my Swiss-frenchy-european english ;)

    1. Re:That Expensive? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, if you don't like it, don't pay for it. One could make the argument that $5 is too much to pay for sugared water, a lump of plastic, fried potatoes and seared meat between bread. That doesn't lower the cost of a happy meal.

      Plenty of people like iTunes. They've sold 70 million songs in a little over a year. Obviously these people think they're getting something worthwhile. I think it's great that people are willing to pay for what's essentially a bunch of bits. Seeing as I like computers and creating content for them, I'd like to eventually be able to sell some of my bits...and through iTMS, there's now a market for them.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:That Expensive? by danigiri · · Score: 2, Insightful
      - They are killing intermediate

      About time! What are the middlemen value-added services again?

      dani++

  38. Price differentiation by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 5, Interesting
    By EU law, can they do this?

    I thought that the EU was dead against people being able to price people differently based on country. In other words, if you go to a site, that site can't give you a different price based on your country of origin. But, that having a UK site and a French site with different prices is OK.

    1. Re:Price differentiation by bygimis · · Score: 1

      You are 100% correct. They have to allow access to the UK, German and French stores to *any* EU citizen! That is the whole point of a free trade/single market area!

    2. Re:Price differentiation by el_womble · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm sure this will be seen in Brussels as another reason why the UK should sell its soul to the Euro.

      --
      Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    3. Re:Price differentiation by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      This is a good parallel...

      here

      If Apple tries to do IP checking, will the EU get involved?

    4. Re:Price differentiation by ianpm · · Score: 1

      For goodness sake, they are probably soft launching to make sure their entire network isn't crippled by 55 million people all downloading 5 tracks. I am sure the rest will follow...

    5. Re:Price differentiation by 216pi · · Score: 1

      No, there isn't such a law. There are even companies that are reimporting volkswagens and audis to Germany because they are sold cheaper in Italy. Look at this.

      Regards, Tim

    6. Re:Price differentiation by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's slightly different. This isn't to say that prices have to be identical across the EU, but that everyone should have fair access to markets.

      Let's say you walked into a showroom in France, and were quoted a different price than the Belgian who walked in before you, for no other reason than nationality, in order to protect price controls.

      In the iTunes example, if iTunes launch 20+ different sites, one for each country, and each has different prices, but each allows anyone from anywhere in the EU, and makes no differentiation based on nationality, that would be acceptable. In the case of sites like, for instance, Amazon, I think that it's probably OK to charge different shipping.

      There was a recent case where people were getting different airline prices from different countries in the EU.

    7. Re:Price differentiation by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I'm not talking about non-availability, but increased prices to the UK.

      I should as a citizen of the UK be able to get the same price as a Frenchman from the same site.

    8. Re:Price differentiation by ianpm · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'm just glad its not 0.99. Its true, we are paying 19c more, but to be honest, thats as near as makes no odds anyway?

    9. Re:Price differentiation by robbie_air · · Score: 1

      I just tried to purchase from the German store with my account (which is registered to the UK store). It wouldn't let me, an error message informed me that my account can only purchase music from the UK store. As the parent says, is this legal under EU law?

    10. Re:Price differentiation by klang · · Score: 1

      Well, technically UK (minus Ireland) is not in the monetary union of EU, therefore there is a difference in the monetary unit you would have to pay (pound or euro) BUT .. I can't see why people in other parts of the EU can't buy freely from the English, German or French sites. EU is a free trade zone!

      I wonder if it's an IP, creditcard or address thing?

    11. Re:Price differentiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't "try" to do IP checking. They DO.
      They also check your credit card number. If your card is issued in e.g Sweden, they won't do business with you.

      The EU is supposed to be an open market, to hell with any restrictive licensing deals Apple might have with the record companies.

    12. Re:Price differentiation by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      THAT may be legal as your account is in the UK. If you can't set up an account in France, that may not be.

      I've just had a look on the French site, and filling in the credit card details, it prefills with "France". In other words, I can't open an account on iTunes France as a UK resident to get access to that market.

      More news later...

    13. Re:Price differentiation by mst76 · · Score: 1

      > I thought that the EU was dead against people being able to price people differently based on country.

      I don't know if there are actual laws against this. The EU is a free trade zone. That does not mean that manufacturers must offer the same product at the same price, but for normal goods, the market does this automatically. If a manufacturer of some widget sells it for much more in France than in Germany, there is nothing stopping anyone from buying it cheaply in Germany and selling it for a little more in France. The market will ensure that prices cannot diverge too much. In case of iTMS this doesn't work because of the DRM; you cannot sell the tunes you purchased cheaply in the US for a little more in the UK.

    14. Re:Price differentiation by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      It's not really resale, it's more about market access.

      It seems from research that I can't use the iTunes France shop because I don't have a French address.

      There was recently some letters written by the EU Commission to some airlines about people were being priced differently for flights depending upon the country they were buying from.

      This isn't the same as buying goods in different countries. A company could have a .co.uk and a .fr, and there can be price differences. That is allowed. But if the company checked my IP before going to the French site, or I think if it redirected me, this would not be.

    15. Re:Price differentiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complain at http://europa.eu.int/citizensrights/signpost/front _end/signpost_en.cfm

  39. No independent labels... by LemonYellow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember that it has taken time for independent labels in the States to sign up. Just because they haven't done so yet doesn't mean that they won't; You can bet that the indies have a high proportion of iPod-toting staff who'd be keen on iTMS and the bosses won't want to pass up the opportunity to make even more money. Patience!

  40. That's not Europe! by mbrix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now here is a good example of using big words in titles that are not at all covering for the real thing. "iTunes Europe goes Live". I didn't know that Europe was only UK, France and Germany. This is the same thing as to say that USA is California and Florida.

    1. Re:That's not Europe! by akiro · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I read the title and thought "finally, about damn time", and then it's only 3 countries of the ~45 countries in Europe. Somebody mod the parent up.

    2. Re:That's not Europe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 of the richest European countries.

      I don't think there's much of a market for this in Lithuania.

    3. Re:That's not Europe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, but a great deal of people say America when in fact they talk about USA.

    4. Re:That's not Europe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since the UK are part of the US these days.

    5. Re:That's not Europe! by Luscious868 · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's right, but a great deal of people say America when in fact they talk about USA.

      That's probably because the United States of America is the only country in America that has the word America in its name. Besides, the term America as you would want us to use it is a grouping. It's all of the countries in North and South America. There is almost never a need to use the term America when speaking of North and South America. When's the last time you heard someone use the term Eurasia in a sentence outside of some geography or history class? Never, because Europe and Asia are so freaking different there's almost never a reason to group them togather in that manner. Same with America, it's almost never used in casual conversation to refer to North and South America becasue North and South America are so differnt from one another.

      So, in short, when people say America they mean the United States of America and for a fairly practical reason. One, the United States of America is the only country in America to have America in it's title. Two, the term America is almost never used outside of school. That's the way it is, get over it.

      If you Canadians hate it so much then why don't you guys change your name to the Canadian Provinces of America. Then you'd have a much more legitimate reason to bitch and moan.

    6. Re:That's not Europe! by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      There is almost never a need to use the term America when speaking of North and South America.

      And when there is the term "western hemisphere" works just as well.

    7. Re:That's not Europe! by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
      You should have said, "This is the same thing as saying that the US is California, Texas and New York," the three largest states in population (and probably economies) with very different cultures.

      Which is much like here in Europe, that is I wouldn't want to live in any of those states, and I don't want to live in Fish & Chips land, frog eaters land, or sauerkraut & sausages land.

      ;-) I joke, but I actually do prefer Sweden to all those places.

    8. Re:That's not Europe! by klang · · Score: 1

      Well, Norway is out because of DVD-Jon, eventhough it is the riches country in the world. :-)

  41. I predict... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    That independent music will become the primary market, and that the consumption will increase greatly. People will explore. But, in order for this to happen, the downward pressure on prices will increase. Artists will never get 50% of the cut, but they will increase their percentage. Better tracking of usage, occuring in many markets, will allow for a better understanding of music/resource usage, and where value is actually added. Labels have value. Musician unions, and licensing groups do also. The service which can increase independent music consumption will win.

    iTunes is in good shape, but there is a lot of music sitting around out there.

    1. Re:I predict... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Artists will never get 50% of the cut, but they will increase their percentage."

      Lots of them do...those that are smart enough to make certain that the publishing is in their name and are business savvy enough to start their own lables (or imprints) to make certain that they get their 'fair share'...

      Ignoring the fact that most nonindependant artists are a loosing proposition to the labels...they take on different artists to hedge the bets in hopes that one will break through and pay for a few dozen others that didn't make money.

      If it weren't for the labels doing this, almost in a pseudosense of socialism -- propping up artists that would otherwise have no commercial chance and allow them to actually make a bit of change on their own (if'n they pay close attention to the contracts that are put in front of them and are designed to be negotiating tools, not something you sign without a lawyer) -- if it weren't for this bit of socialism on the capitalistic bastards known as the Music Industry, the records stores would be far smaller places than they are today. I certainly don't listen to too many mainstream artists other than that of a few friends that are often labeled as such by the media. I listen to a lot of independent minded artists that in the past would have had very little chance of making money, but are making a decent profit because of this opportunity afforded them by the industry.

      So why should musicians get 50% of the cut? They didn't do anything but make the music and they all claim its for artistic purposes first and foremost, and as such have no right to bitch about the business decisions of others that allow their compatriots that were in the wrong place at the wrong time or just don't care to appeal to the masses. By taking a smaller chunk, you ensure that your friends and the art community as a whole benefit -- even if it is enforced by an evil corporation in the end...I'd rather give half my profits to others to be certain that they get a chance.

  42. Does anyone else here wonder how long it's... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...going to be before Apple becomes a media company who just happens to sell software and computers? Right now, there are definitely a hardware company that sells software. But with the iPod, and whatever next Big Thing that will follow, I have to wonder how much of the bottom line is going to be based on media content?

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
    1. Re:Does anyone else here wonder how long it's... by saddino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Typically, a "media" company owns its own content. Apple owns no real content (either than its ads), nor is it making a play (yet) for a content company (or vice-versa, e.g. Sony buying Apple); so it doesn't appear that Apple is moving towards becoming a media company.

      However, as you noted, Apple is certainly branching into consumer electronics, so it's more likley that they will continue to be a hardware company, but just one not completely focused on the computer market only. Given Apple's numerous awards for industrial design and cachet as being "sexy" and "upscale", it's probably a smart move (as the success of the iPod has proven).

      Hardware was, is and probably will remain to be what Apple's all about.

    2. Re:Does anyone else here wonder how long it's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, there is also that Pixar company with some content.

  43. Magnatune.com by pointwood · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out Magnatune.com - no DRM, just music and 50% goes to the musicians.

    1. Re:Magnatune.com by dbirchall · · Score: 1
      Only 50%? In this day and age?

      There are companies (CD Baby comes to mind) who'll put your indie-band music up on the iTunes store, and take only a 9% cut of the 66-67% wedge of the pie that the "label" gets.

      If I'm doing my math right, that means the 99 cents for a song are split up 33 cents for Apple, 6-7 cents for CD Baby, and 59-60 cents for the artist.

      That's obviously about a 10% better deal than Magnatunes is offering. And honestly, if I were trying to sell my music, I'd really rather do so at the store that's accounting for a huge percentage of all legal downloads than at some site that I only ever see mentioned in /. comments and the like, touting its great (well, not so great, after all) financial treatment of artists. :)

    2. Re:Magnatune.com by glenstar · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have both Magnatune and CDBaby as content partners and I have to say that you are comparing apples and oranges. CDBaby is more a la carte... no promotions, etc. They are a CD distributor that offers digital distribution. As such, they only charge a small administrative fee. Magnatune, on the other hand, is more of a digital record label... offering support and promotion for its bands. Given the services that John offers, I think that a 50% split is more than generous.

      As for either one being a good deal... they are both incredible deals for the artists! Compare with an artist on a major label and you'll see what I mean. There are several major label artists that I know of who make no money from digital sales because they had very incompetent legal counsel.

  44. Shipping versus downloading by kherr · · Score: 4, Informative

    amazon can sell music cd's across europe, why can't apple sell music files across europe?

    I suspect the difference is that Amazon.com just ships around pre-made physical goods, whereas iTunes Music Store offers digital downloading. It's essentially a completely new form of commerce.

    Apple needs to convince the labels that they want to offer their product through iTMS, hence the need to negotiate deals. Apple has also said the labels make the actual music files, not Apple. So again, Apple has to convince the labels to put effort into encoding their products for iTMS.

    1. Re:Shipping versus downloading by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I suspect the difference is that Amazon.com just ships around pre-made physical goods, whereas iTunes Music Store offers digital downloading. It's essentially a completely new form of commerce.

      I really honestly do not see the difference between buying a cd on amazon and having it delivered by truck, and buying a cd on itunes and having it delivered by internet. It's just a distribution scheme. That round piece of metal-coated plastic you're buying when you buy a physical cd does not represent the actual product, since if you create a copy of it and destroy the original, you still legally own a license to play that music.

    2. Re:Shipping versus downloading by druhol · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the record labels see things differently.

      --
      WWD4D?
  45. Re:Who cares? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh, the same tired tale. You know, if you want to get the record companies to stop promoting shitty bands, maybe you should first get people to stop buying shitty albums. It is a tragedy that Britney Spears has sold ten times as many records as Tom Waits with a quarter of the talent...but them's the breaks.

    I mean, it's not like independent labels don't exist, don't sign bands and don't release albums to the mass market INCLUDING over iTunes. In fact, iTunes has more independent labels than any other online music store. You don't think SONY Connect is gonna court Asian Man Records, do you?

    I've actually been quite surprised by the number of GOOD artists who get above-the-fold promotion on iTunes. Even the ones who don't are displayed RIGHT NEXT to their corporate shilling brethern. And the selection beats the crap out of the most ecclectic brick & mortars I've seen. I mean, iTunes has the friggin' Kind Geedorah record. I had to literally threaten violence at my local Newbury Comics to get them to even ORDER that shit, and even then it cost me $20.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  46. Hmm what does this remind me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An organisation that collects license fees for artists who will never see a dime of it and aren't even members...
    Oh yeah. The RIAA!

  47. Must resist... MUST RESIST... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
    I can't!

    I, for one, welcome our new Apple overlords.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    1. Re:Must resist... MUST RESIST... by Cyberdork · · Score: 1

      I, for two, welcome our new Apple overlords. ;)

  48. Phew by el_womble · · Score: 1

    Well what a relief. I've been looking forward to getting iTunes in the UK since I bought my PowerBook 7 months a go. I thought today was going to be expensive but as the store is pretty much empty Apple are going to save me some cash - wait is that the reality distortion field at work again.

    Come on Apple. Sort it out and give us access to all the music!

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  49. Are you sure? by redwoodtree · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just bought Franz Ferdinand last night from iTunes and I know they have the White Stripes. I think what you're seeing is the same thing as we saw in the US, it took a few months for the library to grow and become more inclusive.

    So, I wouldn't say the independent labels are not signing up, they're there, it's just an issue of providing the same library we get in the US to you guys across the pond.

    1. Re:Are you sure? by gowen · · Score: 1
      I just bought Franz Ferdinand last night from iTunes and I know they have the White Stripes.
      They're signed to different labels in the US than in Europe. (FF are on indie Domino in the UK, distinctly non-indie Sony in the US; white stripes are on XL and V2, respectively) Thats the difference.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Once they work out the licensing and export restrictions I'm sure the music will be showing up in the Europe store as well.

      I see partial albums turn to full albums overnight here. Negotiations between record companies are happening every day. Sometimes you just need to hang in there. It's not like you *needed* the music right now anyways. :)

  50. How's this for a "music service" idea? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. I go into a record store or on an Internet CD seller's web site.

    2a. I buy one or two standard format CDs from the large range on display for a reasonable price that is identical (in my own local currency) no matter what part of the world I am in or

    2b. I buy separate tracks in an open format like MP3 or OGG and burn them to a standard CD either in the record store or at home.

    3. I play, rip, burn my songs in whatever format I like on whatever application I like on whatever OS I like.

    A revolutionary idea, I agree, but I think it might just work...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:How's this for a "music service" idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The record companies would never agree to that. The only way apple is still holding onto their licensing is the fact that they embed your customer id into the drm and the aac file itself.

      If you could freely trade files the service would be pointless.

    2. Re:How's this for a "music service" idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. I buy music I want from the Apple ITMS.
      2. I burn it to standard CD.
      3. I do whatever I want with it.

      It is not lossless, but I have no equipment that allows me to differentiate between CD quality and 128 kbs AAC.
      How is iTunes different from what you want? If I keep the file in the original format there are SOME MINOR restrictions. If I burn it to a CD I can do whatever I want with it, including reripping and sharing to 6 billiuon other computers. And I get it immediately, without having to go to crappy record store.

      If it ain't worth 99cents (US or Euro) then I don't really want it.

      As for the Brits whining, it sure does suck to have the most powerful currency in the world now doesn't it. Get over it, it'll fluctuate. And remember in the US tax is added afterward (varies by state) in EU the tax is included in the listed price.

    3. Re:How's this for a "music service" idea? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      4. You upload those downloaded tracks to a million, million of your closest friends via Kazaa or whatever the piracy service of the week is.

      5. The people who made the music lose out on lots of sales.

      That's why it wouldn't work.

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:How's this for a "music service" idea? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Ah, now, that's where you are making an incorrect assumption...

      You are assuming I am guilty of copyright theft before such has been proven - exactly the same as the the RIAA and record companies are doing at the moment.

      The fact is that I actually don't use Kazaa or any P2P service - but I do have an MP3 player and a love of self-compiled CDs for when I am driving in the car. That's why I want to maintain my rights to my music.

      However, by your logic, if a speeding BMW driver knocks over and kills a pedestrian, it would be valid to restrict all BMW cars to a maximum speed within the speed limit as a result.

      The fact is that there is no evidence of loss of sales as a result of copying or sharing - the Internet is just an extension of what people have always done, namely shared music together because that is what music essentially is - a social experience.

      I don't support file sharing for the purposes of piracy (i.e. somebody selling illegal copies of somebody else's work) but social sharing, to me, is harmless.

      If the profiteering music companies offered better quality and value to the consumer, they would sell more product - simple economics.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    5. Re:How's this for a "music service" idea? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      You are assuming I am guilty of copyright theft before such has been proven

      No, I'm saying that if you distribute an unprotected format somebody will pirate your content. Guaranteed, 100%, no question.

      That's why I want to maintain my rights to my music.

      Then buy music from vendors who are happy to offer yout those rights. Don't buy music from vendors who want to offer you limited rights. And quit your fucking whining about it, because you are not fucking entitled to anything.

      However, by your logic, if a speeding BMW driver knocks over and kills a pedestrian, it would be valid to restrict all BMW cars to a maximum speed within the speed limit as a result.

      Wow. You're an idiot.

      --

      I write in my journal
  51. But it's still a rip off... by Gilesx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You for one may decide to use it, but on the other hand, I for one will continue to purchase my CDs for 6.99 for CD-Wow (average of 11 tracks at 6.99 is 64pence a track) with the added bonuses of

    a - Better sound quality

    b - no restrictions on how many different devices I play it on

    c - no restrictions on how many times I can rip it

    d - the possibility of ripping it to the (superior) ogg format.

    e - the artist getting a bigger cut of my money

    f - casing, and cover art

    So when you buy a CD, you get more for less. Hmmmmm so tell em again, exactly why is iTunes such a great deal?

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:But it's still a rip off... by Sheltim · · Score: 1

      a) it's good enough for me. I don't notice the difference. b) burn it to a CD, in your comparison, you're already dealing with a cd instead of just a digital file. c) please tell me how *7* burns is restricting, especially when you can just remake a list or reset the counter d) well, if you are burning the "iTunes file" to a CD, you can rip it to ogg anyway e) I don't know anything about this, you're probably right f) good point

    2. Re:But it's still a rip off... by Sheltim · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the formatting of my post. Here it is again:

      a) it's good enough for me. I don't notice the difference.

      b) burn it to a CD, in your comparison, you're already dealing with a cd instead of just a digital file.

      c) please tell me how *7* burns is restricting, especially when you can just remake a list to reset the counter

      d) well, if you are burning the "iTunes file" to a CD, you can rip it to ogg anyway

      e) I don't know anything about this, you're probably right

      f) good point

    3. Re:But it's still a rip off... by hemanman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because, you can't rip your new CD's anyway! They are f*cked up to offer copy protection, that can easily be broken, but the loss is the bits that keep the error-correction, thus making the quality lower than any regular CD.

      Breaking the CD copy protection is illegal by law, so even if you could use say a HIFI CD-player with optical digital out and a soundcard in your PC with optical digital in to do this, it would be illegal.

      So this sums up to:

      a - Yes, but with some scratches, you'll be lucky to hear anything...

      b - Well, you can use anything besides a Computer, certain car stereo's and HIFI cd-players with advanced features(B&O dosen't play those scrap CD's)

      c - Exactly 0 times, because it would be illegal to break the copy "protection"

      d - No, not unless you break the law

      e - Perhaps, I wouldn't know, they got some creative accounting people at the recordcompanies, how else whould they be able to convince governments to put special musical artist tax on Flash ram cards, and empty CD's?

      f - The cover "art" has been in servere decline the last many years, today's standard I could do in photoshop in 2 hours

      Thats why iTunes is such a great deal, because thats the ONLY way you can get new music to a transportable format legally. A CD is somewhat transportable, but I don't feel like bringing a suitcase with CD's every time I take the train/plane etc.

      -H

  52. Spend it here. by Karoshi · · Score: 1

    Warp Records Reject DRM, Go Bleep
    Good MP3 quality, no DRM.

    --
    Don't answer me. Moderate. Slashdot is about moderation, not discussion.
  53. No such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True believers DO have Mac OS X!

  54. EU iTunes Music Store in October by johnpaul191 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Apple also announced today that it will launch a European Union version of the iTunes Music Store in October


    they also said the talks with the indies had just begun. same thing happened in the USA. i think it was mostly because of the legal issues. they need the big labels onboard to make the store look valid. the indies were offered "the same deal as the majors" and can choose if they want to sign on. it might also have had a little to do with keeping it under wraps till it was really ready. with so many indies, it would have been easy for info to leak out and we know how Apple hates that.

  55. Re:Slashdot censors Firefox 0.9 release by REBloomfield · · Score: 1
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/14/191124 2&mode=thread&tid=113&tid=126&tid=154&tid= 95

    You lazy turd.

    Where's this evidence then, since you keep posting this garbage in every sodding story?

  56. I just don't understand... by burbs · · Score: 1

    the reason why companies have to offer two different online store fronts for two different parts of the world. Can people in the US not buy music from companies in Europe, or vice-versa? What was it that prevented Europeans from going to Apple's website and downloading the iTunes music software, but prevented them from getting music?

    Thanks.

    1. Re:I just don't understand... by rjung2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Son, let me tell you about this thing called "Copyright law"...

    2. Re:I just don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to do with copyright law, it's all about controling the market.

      Even DVD zoning is not this restrictive!

    3. Re:I just don't understand... by burbs · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. I had no idea it extended to music purchases of this nature. Very interesting.

  57. 40th County by gidds · · Score: 1
    'Sokay, we don't mind. As long as we can refer to the US as 'the 40th county'!

    (Except, of course, that the number of counties varies a lot depending on whether you're talking about traditional divisions, administrative areas, postal districts -- and when...)

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  58. Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about this then:

    This site is both illegal and immoral for users in the rest of the world. Just because it's convenient and you can go unpunished for now doesn't make it right.

    1. Re:Worrying by in7ane · · Score: 1

      Please, get off your moral high horse.

      First: and read this carefully, it is NOT illegal, it's as legal as me going to Russia buying legal CD's there and bringing them back (want to bring up that it's a copy? fine, it's encoded for you specifically and so isn't. want to bring up that it's not the same bits? fine, do you want to discuss the quantum physics of a physical CD as well then?).

      Second: immoral, well it's globalization for the consumer's benefit, and don't tell me about the artists getting screwed, I'll worry about that when all artists worry about me getting screwed by an organization a lot of them fund.

      Maybe we should have 'fair trade' CD's, like the coffee, which are sold by the artists directly :)

    2. Re:Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's about as legal as you going to Russia and buying illegal copies of the CDs. The "legal" entity that AllOfMP3 is delivering payment to is not recognized by the US artists it purports to represent. It doesn't have the authority to make copies, and yet it's legal to make them because they said it was okay? That's like you coming to me and asking if you can sell a bunch of copies of the new Beasties record and me saying "sure."

    3. Re:Worrying by in7ane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it is. RIAA is not a world wide organization (...of America will point you to this), it only has ANY relevance in the US, what gives them their 'legal' status is a Russian RIAA (you can read the legal international agreements from the 80's/90's, after USSR's fall, which do actually give them the right to represent western artists). So yes it is legal in Russia (else it would have been shut down THERE, no? - there are laws and even traces of civilization in other places than the US, as hard as that may be to believe).

      RIAA only governs music in the US, if you buy the music elsewhere and then import it for personal use it's all ok as long as you acquired it legally (and you have, according to Russian law, which is what's relevant here).

    4. Re:Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a read of this.

      You can make your own mind up on the issue I guess.

      Quite pertinent is this bit of information however (this is an oversight not unrelated to the view aired on here that Indian programmers are left in some form of poverty by the outsourcers)

      But the most important factor is that one US dollar is worth lots of rubles. In Russia CDs cost about 100 rubles ($3). So to Russians Allofmp3 is in fact almost as expensive as iTunes to Americans.

      Personally I think it boils down the Russians refusing to buy into the American drive to bring standardised copyright legislation to the world.

      Standardised - good, American system effectively bought and paid for by the corporations under America's ludicrous all but in name bribe-oriented political system? - bad (you could argue with me on that, but did The People really want Disney to be able to refuse works entry into the public domain this side of the Sun dying?)

    5. Re:Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But *what* are you importing? Electrons in terms of bytes and bits? Are you sure the electrons are made in Russia? You can try to justify the legality by comparing it with importing CDs, but are they the same?

    6. Re:Worrying by in7ane · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are, since it's been said numerous times by the RIAA (the only ones likely to bring up an argument like that) that it's the LICENSE that you are buying, not the physical object (CD, otherwise there couldn't be the broadcast/use restrictions attached could there?). From that it's clear that it doesn't truly matter what the license is attached to, and so the bits (again, if you want to bring up the argument that it's not the 'exact' same bits, then there is a similar quantum physics argument for the CD) I import are the same as importing a physical CD.

  59. Variety of Tracks by herwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is low. I couldn't find many artists I wanted, and the songs available for the others were quite limited.

  60. Re:Look at British Ariways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should look at British Airways

    A return flight from LHR to JFK
    is 40% more than
    A return flight from JFK to LHR

    Same day, same airline

    WTF !!??!!

  61. I want globalisation *for everyone* by ponxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Big business has been arguing (quite rightly) the case for a free flow of goods and services as a means of creating more efficient markets and thus lowering their production cost. Unfortunately, at the same time they appear very hesitant in extending these benefits to the consumer.

    Region encoding on DVDs was only the most blatant example where markets were kept artifically separate, but it extends to many other areas, particularly cars (VW has been convicted under EU law for trying to stop Germans buying VWs abroad where they sell them cheaper), fashion (companies prosecuting anyone who dares to "re-import" produce that was to be sold cheaper abroad), CDs (CD-wow was prosecuted for importing CDs to the UK and selling them for US-prices) ...

    It's a world of free trade, so if I want to source my products from the cheapest source I should be allowed to. I can see that some companies warrenties might not be valid abroad, or that I'd have to pay additional shipping, but creating artifically separated markets can only be bad for the consumer!

    I'm particularly annoyed in the case of downloadable music. There are *no* shipping costs, yet i-tunes US won't sell music to a UK customer, presumably because they figured out they can extract more money from them...

    This is even more galling when it happens internally in the EU where there are supposed to be *no* trade-barriers, yet i-tunes germany also won't sell to the UK.

    Companies should not get away with having their cake and eating it. If they want globalisation they also have to face global competition for customers and can't be allowed to create artificial niches. If the Brits are prepared to pay a few pennies more in return for a more British service and not having to convert currencies, that's fine, but if I want to buy from the US (or Europe) I should definitely be allowed to do so!

    1. Re:I want globalisation *for everyone* by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are *no* shipping costs, yet i-tunes US won't sell music to a UK customer, presumably because they figured out they can extract more money from them...

      Or presumably because it would get them sued by copyright holders because the deal under which they sell songs in the USA only covers the USA or indicted for tax evasion because each nation has it's own laws & taxes.

      I'm sure that if Apple is making a profit at .99 per song they would be happy to just sell through one world-wide store and not have to come up with hundreds of different ones in each different country. Sure, maybe they could gouge a little extra profit out of the U.K. but then again they are losing sales from all the countries they will *never* set up a store for as well as a year or more worth of sales while they were setting up the Euro-iTunes.

    2. Re:I want globalisation *for everyone* by ponxx · · Score: 1

      > Or presumably because it would get them sued
      > by copyright holders because the deal under
      > which they sell songs in the USA only covers
      > the USA

      but that's exactly my point. It should not be legally possible to give someone the right to sell a product (and that's what music is) "in country x", you either sell people the right to trade music or you don't...

      These laws allow companies to arbitrarily separate markets which in my opinion is a very bad thing...

      > or indicted for tax evasion because
      > each nation has it's own laws & taxes.

      A large number of US shops will deliver to me in the UK, including places that let me download and pay for software online. Surely if this is possible legally it'll be the same for music...

  62. Depends on how you use it by reptilicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I agree that it's not a good deal for purchasing an entire album, for the reasons you listed. Where it is a really good deal, is purchasing individual tracks. For example, there are all sorts of tracks by my favorite artists available only on compilation albums. I don't want any of the other tracks on the compilation album, just the one. So it's great that I can pay 99 cents and get the song I want, rather than $18.99 in a store for the entire album, which I wouldn't listen to. The same goes for many reissued albums--Sonic Youth have put out a "deluxe" version of "Dirty". I already own the cd, but would like to have some of the new extra tracks without repurchasing the whole thing.

  63. Well I've just tried it by seamustheshark · · Score: 2, Informative

    ....and as a bit of A Jazz fan, found the selections available quite good.

    After a few clicks, I located some old Nina Simone stuff, that I've only seen on more expensive compilations.

    One strange thing is that some of the albums are shown as "partial" on the UK Site, but "Full" on the US one? I have the ability to selct the US site, but haven't tried ordering from there?

    Anyone know if that would work? It used to be that the iTunes Store Page wouldn't display at all,, but now it does, and I can select UK, France, Germany or the US sites - as has been noted previously, the prices are different, but 79 pence is less than originally mooted?

    Personally, I don't think its too much per track - in the UK, everyone is used to "Rip-Off Britain" so 79 pence is cheap to us!

    --
    -- Seamus
  64. But, do you understand... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That the majority of users are not using windows XP. The majority of windows users are still at the win 98 stage. Apple is instead trying to make it work well on the newest platform available. People who spend mor eto upgrade thier computer are more afluent and therefore are a better demographic to have running their software. Plus, it probely wouldn't look as "good" as it does on XP. Thats most likely the real reason.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:But, do you understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, it probely wouldn't look as "good" as it does on XP. Thats most likely the real reason.

      "Shooter of Bul"l indeed.

  65. International Farce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm in france, using a french keyboard (a sick invention) with english XP, download iTunes 4.6, I select france as the home country, click on a track and what do I get?
    "This track is not available in your store" in french.
    I been waiting for the EU version of iTunes for a year, what's the point if I still can't get the music I'm interested in?
    P***** de m****!

  66. different selections how? by devonbowen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People are saying the selection is low. How is Apple providing two different store fronts? Are they keying on the IP address? I live in Europe but use a US credit card to buy from iTMS. Will this change if iTMS is offered in my country?

    Devon

    1. Re:different selections how? by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 2, Informative
      As long as your CC is billed to a U.S. address, you will be able to buy from the U.S. iTMS.

      I have a U.S. CC, but my billing address is in Sweden, so I am out of luck (until October).

  67. All apologies by sjb2016 · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the RTFA comment earlier, I got my articles confused. You're right, the Register doesn't say so, but this article at Maccentral does.

  68. This pisses me off by motown · · Score: 1

    Well put, parent poster.

    Europe was supposed to be a single economic union, especially for circumstances like this.

    Why are the inhabitants of the smaller EU countries being treated as second-rate citizens?

    And what's with letting the UK go first, anyhow? They don't even want to be a member of the EU. They're not even part of the Eurozone!

    Wouldn't it have been a lot more sensible for Apple to concentrate on all the Eurozone (single currency) countries first, and expanding to the non-eurozone EU members afterwards?

    I'm pro-european, I believe we need to stand together in order to stand up to the US politically and stand on our own feet, but right now, with EUCD and software patents being rammed down our collective European throats on one hand and being discriminated against with the European iTunes-rollout on the other hand, I'm really getting the feeling like we're having to put up with the disadvantages of a united Europe whithout receiving the advantages.

    Even if the record companies (and thus not Apple) are to blame, Apple should have filed a compliant to the European Authorities instead of conceding.

    As a matter of fact, as I understood it, the entire reason why the European rollout took so long after the US launch was because Apple was trying hard to launch iTunes in the entire EU collectively from the start. Apparently, Apple gave up on that.

    Oh well, for us Dutch it will just be another reason to root for our Orange boys when they battle the German mannschaft in tonight's Euro2004 soccer match.

    --
    "Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
  69. The whole concept is wrong imho by BBird · · Score: 1

    There is no point in having national versions of a download service (only to protect monopolies and rip consumers off). Even less point in having EU country specific sites. Just like dvd zones, these barriers are (hope) doomed. As it is I will not spend a sinply cent in it.

    1. Re:The whole concept is wrong imho by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of reasons to have country-specific sites. Localization and Internationalization incorporates much more than just presenting pages in the correct languages and dates and numbers in the correct formats. There are cultural differences between countries, and those should be reflected and respected.

    2. Re:The whole concept is wrong imho by BBird · · Score: 1

      With this I might (or do, in general) agree. But what is the point of charging different prices and saying "sorry, this song is for US downloaders only"?

  70. Re:the rest of .eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) October
    2) see next answer
    3) yes and licensing agreements with the labels

  71. Didn't it say 79 pence? by gotr00t · · Score: 1

    In the article text it says that for Britain it was 79 pence, which is somewhat better than 99, but still more expensive than if it had been paid for in euros.

    1. Re:Didn't it say 79 pence? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Good comprehension skills. Read the grandparent again.

  72. and why would this be different from.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...say comparing US and Canada, or US and Cuba. Just because they're close together doesn't mean shit unless you have things like the EU pulling the countries left right and centre into the modern world. In fact, the worse country for international transactions is the UK. Banking system just doesn't know what to do. They still expect you to work with SWIFT codes and then get hefty fees. It's against the law to charge all the old banking fees if you use IBAN! That's the whole point of it.

    ciao

  73. And when did iTunes NOT let you burn? by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you buy music using iTunes, you get unlimited burns to CD, and then you can rip it and play it on whatever machine/platform you like. I can't believe that people use the reason of having a closed, DRM-infested format for criticizing ITMS when clearly, there is a very easy way out of it: burn to disc.

    Moreover, you would be suprised at how clear the 128kbps AAC is. Just for the sake of testing, I own a copy of a song (ATB - Don't Stop) on CD, and I bought another copy on ITMS and burned it onto a CD. I listened to both, and I honestly could not tell which was which.

  74. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but them's the breaks"

    Can someone translate that into english?

  75. Gratz, Europe by kongjie · · Score: 1

    For the first time since it opened, I CANNOT access the iTunes Store. Anyone else experiencing this? Can European access be causing congestion?

  76. Linux by Sim2 · · Score: 1

    Being a European, I've never looked at whether there is a workaround for Linux users, so I'll ask here...

  77. Oh yeah! by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    I just got a new cash card through, and just in time it seems!

    (Although there's no money in the account, making the point moot :-\ )

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  78. Too much.... by Querty · · Score: 0

    Simply too expensive. About 14 tracks make 1 album. That works out to slightly under 14 EUR for an album for which:

    1. I have to provide the storage medium
    2. Is of less quality than CD
    3. Has no booklet/cover
    4. Has DRM restrictions
    5. Won't play on my iRiver H-120

    I fail to see the good deal here :-(

    However, allofmp3.com never looked this good... :-)

    1. 0.01 or 0.02 USD per Mbyte (depending on encoding type)
    2. Encode to your own preference (Ogg Vorbis q6 for me)
    3. No DRM
    4. Plays on whatever device you have

    I'm sure someone will tell me the artist gets screwed this way. I see it like this:

    iTunes: I get screwed big time.
    allofmp3: The artist gets screwed.

    I start buying at a 3.50 USD pricepoint for an album and I get:

    1. choice of Ogg Vorbis
    2. no DRM
    3. no MacOS or Windows requirement
    4. no device (e.g. iPod) requirement

    That leaves about 2.00-2.50 USD to the artist per album when I subtract the allofmp3 costs. I think that's fair (and a helluvalot more than most artists are getting now)

    1. Re:Too much.... by Dave114 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That leaves about 2.00-2.50 USD to the artist per album when I subtract the allofmp3 costs.

      I did a little bit of digging on AllofMP3.com, but nowhere did I come across statistics on just how big a piece of the pie the artists are getting. Where are you getting your numbers from?

    2. Re:Too much.... by ITR81 · · Score: 1
      I have a feeling you don't know your head from your arse.

      If something sounds too good to be true then it probably isn't true. You maybe getting a great deal with allofmp3 but I doubt the artists are. They have no rights if their music is put up on that site or not. They have no rights in how much money they can get. You say you figure they get $2.00-$2.50. How do you know? For all you know allofmp3 is runned by the Russian Mafia(which does have swinging power in Russia) and they send 25 cents or something to the artists..if anything at all. Has any big name artist supported allofmp3?? I know iTMS has from both mainstream and indi.

      Oh yeah get over Ogg very few people even use it anymore. Plus I rather use ALE(Apples Lossless Encoder) or rip it at 160kbps on AAC anyday.

    3. Re:Too much.... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      That leaves about 2.00-2.50 USD to the artist per album when I subtract the allofmp3 costs. I think that's fair (and a helluvalot more than most artists are getting now)

      I would be extremely surprised if any of the allofMP3 fees go to the artists at all. Chances are they are paying fees to the RIAA or whatever the Russian equivelant of it is, but it's kinda like the CD-R taxes in other countries. The money goes to the record companies who don't share with the artists one cent.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:Too much.... by Querty · · Score: 1

      I was assuming that with allofmp3.com the artist gets nothing. Do the math (I was assuming you could do it yourself)...

      Situation 1 (iTunes): I pay 14 EUR for an album (that's about 16.90 USD)

      Situation 2 (allofmp3): I pay between 1.00-1.50 USD per album

      Situation 3 (hypothetical): I pay 3.50 USD per album.

      If you deduct the 1.00-1.50 USD allofmp3.com considers profitable enough to run their business (assuming the artist gets zilch/nada/nothing in Russia) and you are left with 2.00-2.50 USD to pay the artist.

      The math works out to:

      16.90 (itunes) - 1.50 (max cost allofmp3) - 2.00 (artist) = 13.40 USD. Therefore, I conclude that if I buy an album from iTunes I get screwed for 13.40 USD. This is not even counting in the disadvantages of iTunes concerning format and DRM.

    5. Re:Too much.... by Querty · · Score: 1

      Since I'm paying less than 1.50 USD per album at allofmp3.com, I'd say it's unlikely the artist would be getting 2.00-2.50 USD.

      What I am saying is that *IF* the cost were around the 3.50 USD mark, I'd buy from a (hypothetical) music store.

      3.50 - (1.00 to 1.50) = 2.00-2.50 USD to pay the artist.

      Happy?

      I don't care about your favorite codec. *I* happen to like Ogg Vorbis, so *I* would like to make the choice to have *MY* tracks encoded to Ogg Vorbis which plays on *MY* iRiver player and *MY* Linux distribution. Allofmp3 offers me that choice, iTMS does not.

    6. Re:Too much.... by Querty · · Score: 1

      I fully agree, I don't think the artist gets 1 cent of allofmp3 downloads.

      That's why I would gladly pay a few bucks more per album to support the artist (hence my 3.50 USD figure). At allofmp3 I normally pay about 1 USD per album (which I agree is too little), but they seem to be able to run a webstore+encoding+distribution business from it. The difference between the above amounts would be a fine amount to go to the artist (i.e. 2.00-2.50 USD).

      All I'm saying is that the 15+ USD that iTMS asks is way over the top....

    7. Re:Too much.... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree, I don't think the artist gets 1 cent of allofmp3 downloads.

      That's why I would gladly pay a few bucks more per album to support the artist (hence my 3.50 USD figure). At allofmp3 I normally pay about 1 USD per album (which I agree is too little), but they seem to be able to run a webstore+encoding+distribution business from it. The difference between the above amounts would be a fine amount to go to the artist (i.e. 2.00-2.50 USD).


      Oh, I misunderstood you. I thought you were implying that on a 3.50 purchase at allofmp3.com, you could expect about 2.50 to go to the artists.

      My question for you is this: How do propose getting the extra money to the artists? Do you just mail it to their fan club, or try to track them down in meatspace and give it to them personally? These questions bother me. I'd like to see someone implement a secure "virtual tip jar" and figure out how to actually disburse the funds to the real artists in question. That way, people that like allofmp3.com could get over their guilty conscience. :-)

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    8. Re:Too much.... by Querty · · Score: 1

      Good question. I assume that the way iTMS handles the indies could be a model for this. I'm not claiming to have a solution to this though. Many others have proposed ideas to address precisely this problem in a far more eloquent way than I could.

      All I'm saying is that the iTMS system is a really lousy deal.

  79. But what about iTunes CANADA? by DuckWing · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've used apple computers since '86 and Linux since '96. I've always Liked a lot of what Apple has done, but the constant delay an foot dragging to get the Apple Store into Canada and now the iTunes Store into Canada is just stupid. I don't get it. Canada should have been 2nd on the list or done at the same time the US was done. It took ages for the Apple Store to come to Canada, and now that it is, it's great.

    Maybe I need to go to Cupertino and punch Jobs in the Face for his idiocy on these things. Brilliant when it comes to many things, but lacking in many ways at others :-(

    --
    -- DuckWing
  80. Hope everyone noticed.... by bullitB · · Score: 2, Funny

    The US iTunes site says "The Best Digital Jukebox."
    The UK site says "A digital jukebox beyond compare."

    I think they got a bit of a fright from that "the PowerMac G5 is the world's fastest computer" debacle.

  81. Some are limited by algorithm by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In the case of "American Pie", I believe the problem is the length of the song - no matter what the song is, if it's over eight minutes long (perhaps seven? I forget the exact number) you can only get the song with the album - that is iTunes doing, not the lables.

    Not to say labels do not sometimes do exactly what you are saying (witness the Shrek 2 soundtrack with a few missing tracks) but it's not quite as many cases as you might think.

    Also, publishers do have control of the per-album price so if they don't want people buying the whole CD for 9.99 then they can charge more. In those cases I either just download the few songs I like, or if I really like the whole thing but they are charging too much for the whole CD I buy a few songs and get the rest from P2P. That way I keep pricing eqilibrium at a point I am happy with, and the artist still gets some money.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Some are limited by algorithm by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Check before you comment. It's not that "American Pie" isn't available for "buy the song," it's not available AT ALL. In fact, you can buy tracks 2-10 of the album American Pie...but without that one song, it's not much of a record, you know?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Some are limited by algorithm by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Actually, not quiet right. If it is over 8 minutes, the label or artist or whoever has the option of making it album only, but it isn't a requirement. Look at the electronic section and you can see a lot of songs over 8 minutes that can be bought as a single song.

  82. There isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iTunes is windows/mac only and does not work in wine (although it is, I believe, being worked on).

  83. Does the US iTMS have access to Euro musicians? by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can find some Euro releases of stuff from here in the US?

    There are quite a few European bands that I really, really like, but I mostly end up waiting on a US release of their albums, or paying the exorbitant import fees at the record store.

  84. Beastie Boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strangely, the new Beastie Boys album is $15 in iTunes, and $10 at BestBuy, Circuit City and Target. Why wouldn't I just buy the CD, then? ...if you somehow find a way to listen to that particular album before you buy it, i think you'll be able to come up with an answer to that question on your own...

  85. Shame it doesn't work... by Danj2k · · Score: 1

    ... with certain Switch debit cards. They provide the option for new UK users to use a debit card (such as Switch or Solo) to sign up with, but some users (such as myself, but there are others) get a "declined" error when trying to enter their card details. I've also heard that there are problems when trying to enter London postcodes, apparently it doesn't recognise them.

    1. Re:Shame it doesn't work... by kevinbr · · Score: 1

      Switch is what I use - Nat West, and I have a London Post Code. I bought my first album this afternoon. Took a while obviously load related issues.

    2. Re:Shame it doesn't work... by Danj2k · · Score: 1

      It might be that their card processor doesn't work with certain banks - I'm with the Halifax, and one other guy who had the same problem is with Intelligent Finance which is also a Halifax company. I've posted a support request using the Apple feedback form thingy, but I doubt I'll get any sort of useful response, and someone else reported that their phone support people haven't even been trained to deal with iTunes issues yet and just direct you back to the web form.

  86. This is the 51st state of the US of A by klang · · Score: 1

    ..The English don't really consider themselves a part of Europe (As defined by the EU) anyway.

  87. Oh, by Hugonz · · Score: 1

    And here I am, waiting for iTunes Europa...

  88. Limited Slection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the reasons for the limited selection is that Apple refused to disclose the retail price to the independent labels in advance of the launch. Thus they could not know if the deal on offer was fair. Apple took the position of "we're the biggest you've got to deal with us" and got told to go away.

    I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the independents follow WARP and go for a non-DRM solution. I know some are planning to launch stores using mp3, Ogg Vorbis and FLAC and several labels will lauch this within the next month. I'm sure they'll sell though iTunes as well but there will be a LOT more nonDRM stuff out there in a few months.

  89. Re:Look at British Ariways by cens0r · · Score: 1

    Airlines are screwy no matter where you fly. I'm flying from Seattle to Dallas for a wedding in july. The plane ticket was around $400. If I instead flew from Seattle to Oklahoma City, it was $230. The kicker is that the Seattle to Oklahoma City flight has a connection in Dallas. And the Seattle to Dallas connection is the SAME flight as the one I wanted to take. So basically American Airlines is paying me almost $200 to continue on to Oklahoma City and ride back to Dallas with some friends.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  90. EU: Not just a trade union by n0dez · · Score: 1

    The European Union isn't just a trade union;
    European Union citizens can move freely within the EU the same way as you would it in the US or Canada.
    There are EU laws. Remember the Microsoft case in the EU?
    If you're European, you have the right to vote in the European polls.
    There are some things to fix, though such as having one voice overseas regarding international issues, recognizing all the languages present in the EU member states but having English as the official one, and well, I think European kings should be kicked out of the EU.

    Apple should have launched iTunes in the whole EU.

  91. It may well be illegal by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

    I am not sure how this works... but when you purchase something digital online. Where is the point of sale. Is it where you are at the time or where the server is. Techinically if we draw a parallel to goods.

    Assuming it is where you are then I bet ALLofMP3 don't have the rights to sell in (US,EU etc)

    OR if it is in Russia and we draw a parallel to goods, You would pay a importing duty when it is delivered in most countries so I guess at the very least I would expect you should declare it to the Tax man.

    1. Re:It may well be illegal by Woy · · Score: 1

      Consider it like if you order something by mail. You call a shop in russia and another in your (non-Russia) country. Legally which is the point of sale? You will pay customs for russian goods, so clearly the point of sale is where the selling company is shipping from.

      Regarding declaration to the tax man, in my country in EU we dont declare imports at this volume, the imports are taxed at the border (airport, etc) and if they want to tax this they will have to tax the bytes themselves... all of them, from all sources outside of borders.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
  92. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but Tom Waits has no tits. Like it or not, appearance (image) matters in music. Look at the abundance of boysbands which mainly consist of pretty boys with musical talents as much as a pebble.

  93. Well there goes all my money.... by Puggs · · Score: 1

    So its arrived over here finally...

    The selection seems to be a little limited at the moment - no Pearl Jam, no Bad Religion, no Pixies except the promo song

    Ive still managed to buy 2 albums & a few assorted tracks already.

    Bonus points to Apple for including Soul Coughing - ever heard of them? thought not ;) - go check them out on iTMS

  94. Canadian iTunes by mh101 · · Score: 1

    Who cares about health care or taxes, perhaps in the upcoming Canadian federal election I'll vote for whoever promises to do what it takes to bring iTMS to Canada quickly. =)

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  95. There's always PureTracks.com (nom) by gonzocanuck2 · · Score: 1

    (nom)

  96. Any news about iTMS AUSTRALIA??? by ozpowell · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any information about when iTMS might be available in Australia? Anyone from Apple listening? Thanks.

  97. iTunes Turkey by Atario · · Score: 1

    I'll just wait till they roll out iTunes Turkey, where you'll get songs for 0.99 Turkish Lire.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  98. Oops! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I must have been thinking of some other song then, as the eight (or seven) minute rule has blocked me from a single song purchase a number of times (perhaps Pink Floyd?). The general point still applies (as does the original posters, which I was not refuting).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  99. VAT by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Actually, the US doesn't have VAT, per se; we apply sales tax "at the register," so prices always exclude any tax. There are exceptions (gas, liquor, cigarettes, and other "special" items).

    The highest sales tax is about 8.75%, and the lowest is 0%, depending on state.

    IIRC, iTunes doesn't charge sales tax in the US. If it did, it would be added to the $0.99.

  100. Thanks for your informed opinion. by Nailer · · Score: 1

    From their legal info:

    All the materials in the MediaServices projects are available for distribution through Internet according to license # LS-3-03-79 of the Russian Multimedia and Internet Society. Under the license terms, MediaServices pays license fees for all the materials subject to the Law of the Russian Federation "On Copyright and Related Rights".

  101. Independent labels ripped off by itunes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Independent Label organisations AIM and IMPALA won't agree to the Apple deal as Apple refuse to pay them the same rate they pay major labels, even though indies were promised a level playing field when itunes launched.

  102. Re:Look at British Ariways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should start puking as the plane arrive into Dallas and get off. I'm sure they won't mind

  103. Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya! by Moqawama · · Score: 1

    Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya!

    DEATH TO AMERICAN DOGS.
    DEATH TO AMERICAN PIGS.


    The Americans will soon learn what it is like to live in burning cities with their women and children dying around them! We will make their cities look like al-Fallujah; we will make 11 September seem like a pleasant memory to them! Our brothers in Iraq and our brothers in Palestine and our brothers already in America will see to it!

    Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya!
    Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya!
    Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya!

    DEATH TO AMERICAN PIGS.