Slashdot Mirror


Fuel Cells for Laptop Computers

ArbiterOne writes "An article in PC World states that the company MTI Micro Fuel Cells plans to demonstrate a new technology this week that could pave the way for better power technology for laptop and palmtop computers. The article claims that this new technology could provide a battery life 2.5 times greater than that of a lithium-ion battery. Could this be the solution to the problem of short battery life in high-end notebooks?"

266 comments

  1. At long last. by LEgregius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As long as the laptop designers don't suddenly think that having more power means they can put components that use 2.5 times the power.

    1. Re:At long last. by djtripp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as they don't put out 2.5x the heat, that would be great. A better battery to allow better componentry would be fantastic.

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    2. Re:At long last. by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, they already believe they can create components that use 2.5 times the power, even without the battary to power it :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    3. Re:At long last. by Scoria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A good amount of incredulity is necessary here. Remember that Lithium Ion batteries themselves were once supposedly capable of eliminating the "memory" effect and providing almost infinite battery lives. Then, of course, they were released, and the hyperbole was proven incorrect.

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    4. Re:At long last. by dealsites · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That is not the responsibility of the engineers. The product management team should specify the power vs features trade-off in the design requirements. The engineers will do thier best to design to the requirements. Even now, most laptops are designed for the latest and greatest features. Most people do simple email, word processing, etc...

      It wouldn't be too hard to design a new laptop with the latest form factor improvements, but put slower components in the design. That would yield a laptop with better battery life. The problem is that many older components are not availiable as they ae phased out with the latest top of the line ones.

      --
      9 Gmail invitations availiable

    5. Re:At long last. by jeffy124 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As long as they don't put out 2.5x the heat

      this guy would certainly agree.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    6. Re:At long last. by MP3Chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm ... a laptop that you can't put on your lap. I think they're onto something!!

    7. Re:At long last. by mikael · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't put out 2.5x the heat, that would be great.

      what? Don't you realised the potential that a combined laptop/cooking grill/wok with wireless communication could have for outdoor camping?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:At long last. by name773 · · Score: 1

      for outdoor camping

      well, you won't be selling it here, that's for sure

    9. Re:At long last. by name773 · · Score: 1

      check this out

      and this

    10. Re:At long last. by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 1

      ...and software to run on said (required) components.

    11. Re:At long last. by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh don't let me get into that one. "Hey lets create a game that is a huge memory hog so nobody can run it unless they are running Quad Pentium 10 processors, 95k RPM scsi hard drives (raid required), 14 gigs of ram, and THREE video cards that won't be invented for three years."

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    12. Re:At long last. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ugh... desknotes are bad enough!

      Use a real mobile chip for a moble computer. A 2GHz Dothan is very competitive with a standard P4. With a fuel cell notebook, I want ten hours of battery life, not two and a half.

    13. Re:At long last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a game, that's Longhorn!

    14. Re:At long last. by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 1

      I was referring to Longhorn. =P Games are a bit tricky to develop. Actually, any 'next generation' software. Theoretically, software is developed with what the target audience (consumers) have, in terms of their computing power. Game developers have to develop today for the platform that they predict will be available in the future, which can be a hit-or-miss scenario. How they do this (without being able to optimize for new technologies now, or being able to accurately predict the capabilities of future technology), I don't know. But maybe when the software is actually released *cough*, technology will have caught up.

    15. Re:At long last. by gabebear · · Score: 1
      the Pentium-M is already pretty damn effcient, and can underclock itself when it's not needed for that bad-ass 3D app. Memory can be a big waste of power(generally the more chips(physical) the more power they consume.

      LCD screens (and their CCFT backlights) are a HUGE draw on the battery, and old ones aren't really any better.

    16. Re:At long last. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Don't hardware companies stagger their products? I remember reading an article years ago (around late 90's) stating that if hardware vendors chose to, they could release much better performing equipment - they just choose to stagger it so they can milk it for more profit.
      It makes sense. I could either sell you a 6 Ghtz computer now, or first sell you the 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, etc....

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    17. Re:At long last. by spacerodent · · Score: 2, Funny

      imagine the fun of engineering a laptop with a nice hot cpu,ram, videocard over a nice and most likey explosive fuel cell. Good thing they've bred most the ethics out of us engineers.

    18. Re:At long last. by cryptor3 · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall hearing that if a lithium ion battery begins to not keep its charge as well as it used to, it's not a physical effect as with NiCd or NiMH, but a result of the battery-charging microcontroller sort of getting confused over time at exactly where it is in the battery charging process. That is, it thinks it's completely full, but really it's not.

      I suppose it doesn't really change the resulting effect, though.

    19. Re:At long last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Li-ion cells don't have a memory effect, but the memory effect was a myth in the first place. Like all cells they degrade over time depending on numerous factors.

    20. Re:At long last. by djtripp · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... You could bring your recipes on you laptop, flip it over and cook... But you better bring extra batteries for extra meals and heat

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    21. Re:At long last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at Intel during P2/3 Production. When Intel was producing 300 Mhz PII's I heard of 1 or 2 chips that clocked in at 700+ Mhz after burn in. Yes, they could probably sell you a 6Ghz chip right now. You also wouldn't be able to afford it because it is a freak out of so many lots of production and they tear it apart layer by layer to see if there's anything they can learn and apply to production when they want to get the chips up to that speed.

    22. Re:At long last. by ubiquitin · · Score: 1

      Ummm, that "game" sounds a lot like Longhorn.

      --
      http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
    23. Re:At long last. by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Did you say Origin like in the good old day of Ultima ?

    24. Re:At long last. by Barryke · · Score: 1

      "Hey lets create a game that is a huge memory hog so nobody can run it unless they are running Quad Pentium 10 processors, 95k RPM scsi hard drives (raid required), 14 gigs of ram, and THREE video cards that won't be invented for three years."

      But counting that you make a game that requires so much, i presume it'll take about 3 years to make.
      By that time this system will be standard!
      For example, see the windows longhorn specs.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    25. Re:At long last. by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      you've played lo-mac then??? :-)

      --
      Burma?
    26. Re:At long last. by xpyr · · Score: 1

      That was funny, mod him funny guys :)

  2. The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The nice thing about "normal" batteries is that I can go to my hotel room and recharge them. The last thing I need to be doing is wandering around vegas at three in the morning trying to find some hydrogen to power my notebook for the big presentation in the morning.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by rosewood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I figured these things were easily re-chargeable. If not, wtf is the point?

      I dont think you have to pack little hydrogen pairs in there...

    2. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by goodster · · Score: 1

      That and the fact that most fuel cells tend to operate at 500 to 700 degrees farenheit. That's a toasty laptop.

    3. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      actually, they will probably use hydrogen peroxide, so all you need is a drug store.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only on Slashdot

      The last thing I need to be doing is wandering around vegas at three in the morning trying to find some hydrogen to power my notebook

      During my 3am Vegas wanderings, it sure wouldn't be hydrogen that I'm looking for.

    5. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Informative

      hydrogen peroxide is extremely dangerous and unstable in its pure form. Even the stuff Armadillo Aerospace is using is only 97% pure. Every bottle of hydrogen peroxide I've found in a drug store was 3%. Could a fuel cell operate on mostly water?

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    6. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by delibes · · Score: 1
      The article suggests it will use a mixture of methanol and water. Allowing the public to buy hydrogen in normal retail outlets seems like a real bad idea (though possible good for Darwin awards).

      Ideally it could be as normal to fill up your laptop at a petrol station (gas station for the US folk) as you would your eco-unfriendly SUV.

      --
      This is not a sig
    7. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by baryon351 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What do people want powering their laptops and mp3 players - a well proven electronic device with safe failure modes...

      Try telling that to the user of this laptop. No it's not common, but laptop batteries DO sometimes fail spectacularly & dangerously.

    8. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yeah. The thing that bothers me is the thought of being asked to pay $10 for a $0.15 plastic container filled with $0.05 worth of methanol.

      For long-term mobile computing, I'd like to be able to just carry around a 1C packet of methanol to refill my computer at will.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    9. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they get popular enough, maybe every hotel, corner store, gas station, and coffee shop will carry cheap cartridges.

    10. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's a valid point. With a dead rechargeable battery you can go anywhere, just plug it in and recharge. If there is no mains power, no problem, use the 12V outlet from a car or bring a 50W solar panel or even a wind turbine or what have you.

      When, on the other hand, your hydrogen cartridge (or methanol or hydrogen-peroxide or whatever) runs out you just have to get a new one, there's no way around that. In my opinion the runtime of one cartridge has to be many times (not just 2.5x) that of a battery to make it worth it. And for people working in remote locations it might not be worth it at all.

      We'll see what happens, because as another poster also pointed out, these things have been around the corner for a few years now. It might be a while yet.

    11. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Try telling that to the user of this laptop.

      You do of course realise it's been well established around the mac web that it's a hoax. The owner of the site admitted to faking it in photoshop.

      The last Mac to catch fire was a 5300 in a lab setting in the 1990s, and even then only with a battery that didn't stay in production.

    12. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be worrying about getting hydrogen but be more worried about expelling CO2 & N.

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    13. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Kenja · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, I said it was the last thing I wanted to be doing....

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    14. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Funny

      By themselves, they won't cost very much. But I would expect them to also be equipped with some sort of authentication system, so as to prevent unscrupulous third parties from ruining your name brand system with inferior IP.

      And, of course, the initial fuel cells supplied with the laptop will only be half full.

    15. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > Allowing the public to buy hydrogen in normal retail outlets seems like a real bad idea

      And allowing the public to buy gasoline in normal retail outlets is a better idea?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    16. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe that would be penecillin.

    17. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Ideally it could be as normal to fill up your laptop at a petrol station (gas station for the US folk) as you would your eco-unfriendly SUV.

      'Cuz we're all SUV driving, 10-gallon hat wearing cowboys out here, boy howdy! Yeehaw!

      Racist comments aside, why would buying methanol be any more dangerous than buying gasoline or propane as we do currently?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    18. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gasoline only ignites in a pretty narrow range of fuel/air mixtures. Didn't the engineers come to your school and demonstrate this with the gasoline soaked dollar? Hydrogen is more ignitable but also leaks easier. Hard to say which is more dangerous. I think most battery replacement fuel cells run on methane (which might be cracked for the hydrogen). Hopefully you can buy something similar to the butane? refils that you use for lighters.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    19. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Heck, the most pure commercially available concetration of H2O2 (with a liscense to have it) is something like 33%

      It's kept in a brown plastic container, cause it dosen't like sunlight, and it'll eat pretty much anything (flesh, table top, metal, etc.)

      I can't imagine what 97% would be like.

    20. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by joebok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the article it mentions that they are researching if consumers will pay for replacement fuel cartridges. Later on we find out that one of the companies involved is Gillette - figure they will give the batteries away and stick it to us for the fuel packs...

      If they are not as easy to recharge/refuel as current batteries, what, indeed, is the fucking point?

    21. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Gasoline ignites in a wide range of air/fuel mixtures, just not in liquid form. The problem with this is: Gasoline evaporates like the dickens, and there's never not any vapor hanging around the liquid.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    22. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by frankmu · · Score: 1

      more like rocephin and zithromax

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    23. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding. Did you even look at the pictures? they're photographs man.

    24. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Interesting video: Armadillo Aerospace test of pouring the h2o2 on various materials ... shirts, shoes, etc. to see what the effect was.

    25. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could run a Stirling engine on the exhaust output and start generating electricity, or power some form of locomotion.

      500 to 700 degrees is ridiculous. That's more heat output than when running a nitro-powered radio control engine...

      When the waste heat is that high, something is seriously wrong. They need to slow the reaction down, keep that temp down, otherwise, you'll never get approval to bring it anywhere.

      You'd be better off building a small portable steam engine.

      --
      -- No sig for you!
    26. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      From here the flammable range for gasoline is 1.4-7.6% (of vapor in the air) which may be wide for hydrocarbons, but is narrower than the 4%-74% range for Hydrogen. I couldn't find a list for ignition temps for hydrogen gasoline is only 530-550 F (pretty low). Yeah it does evaporate like the dickens though. My understanding from the movie stunt explinations is that your tank has to be nearly empty for there to be any likelihood of an explosion (sans dateline fireworks triggering it).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    27. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      I guess that's why they call it PHOTO-shop.

    28. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

      They're using stuff that's more like 50% pure. If they could get 97% H2O2, they'd be in the running for the X-prize, instead of 8-10 months behind Rutan.

    29. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by goodster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's not waste heat at all. The reaction inside the fuel cell isn't combustion - it's an electrochemical process... The reaction 'chamber' has to be heated up for the electrodes to start catalyzing the 'fuel'. There's a lot of research being done so that the reaction can occur at room temperature, but right now it's a limitation of the electrodes, not the reaction.

    30. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Most convenient thing would be for it to run off my old glow in the dark radium wristwatch. The halflife of that thing should be long enough.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    31. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 1

      Ever since i was a kid i've used Hydrogen Peroxide on my open wounds to kill off bacteria...Hurts a bit.. I'm hoping I'm not the only one who was taught this? *damn you parents*

      --
      "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
    32. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Don't know about fuel cells, but the burner I have out in the back works just fine on ugly bags of mostly water.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    33. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Patris_Magnus · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where H2O2 came into this conversation, but it does not supply free Hydrogen. H2O2 is an oxidizer that supplies water and a free Oxygen ion to a chemical equation. It would require energy (endothermic reaction) to separate it into H2 and O2. That would be a little difficult to power your laptop off of that particular reaction.

    34. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by ttsalo · · Score: 1
      You could run a Stirling engine on the exhaust output

      They could make a Stirling engine that you stick up your butt.

      I think I'll file for a patent right now.

      --

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
    35. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember seeing some el cheapo batteries once that had been cut open (the one with the cat and lightning bolt on it, I forget the name now) and I shit you not but there was a little mini battery suspended in the middle of the shell. After that I noticed the huge weight difference between premium batteries and cheap ones and suspect it must be a common practice.

    36. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      That logo belongs to Energizer.

  3. Great ! by Braingoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now can we get this working for cars so we don't have to pay outragous gas prices!

    1. Re:Great ! by loyalsonofrutgers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You do realize, don't you, why Bush and Co are focusing on hydrogen as the supposed future? It's so far off in terms of actually replacing much of anything that focusing on it to the detriment of other, more immediately applicable, technologies (hybridization) ensures oil's continued dominance for the foreseeable future.

      This all sort of reminds me of the company that was putting out a huge new version of their product, that was taking an incredibly long time. And all their sales people were saying... don't buy yet.. wait... basically hyping the new product. And then when the new product came out they immediately started hyping the next product. No one bought the first product as a result, the company went out of business, and the second version never appeared.

      There is a progression of technologies here, and praying for a leapfrog to the next decade's technology and ignoring more immediate technologies only benefits the oil companies, and further delays actual energy independence.

    2. Re:Great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As opposed to all the work done in the Clinton administration that went so far in showing how easy, cheap, and fast it would be to switch over to an alternate fuel economy and show those evil oil companies a thing or two, right? Yeah, too bad that when Bush entered office, he immediately ordered it all dismantled and burned to protect his buddies.

    3. Re:Great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush, don't give it away, or I will be forced to release the Haliburton NeoCon Death Bots (tm) to silence you, you brave dissenter you!

      Horst Hosensprecher

      Customer Relations / Haliburton EvilBot (tm) department

    4. Re:Great ! by mikael · · Score: 1

      This all sort of reminds me of the company that was putting out a huge new version of their product, that was taking an incredibly long time. And all their sales people were saying... don't buy yet.. wait... basically hyping the new product. And then when the new product came out they immediately started hyping the next product. No one bought the first product as a result, the company went out of business, and the second version never appeared.

      That was the Osborne series of computers, the world's first "luggable" computer.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Great ! by maeka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They are not "oil" companies. They are energy companies, and they will sell anything that makes them money.
      Do you think Exxon, Chevron, et al are fools? Regardless of how you view their environmental morals, they are in it for the money. They know better than you how much oil is or isn't in the ground. Not only will they gladly invest capitol in the energy source with the highest profit margin, they have a history of investing now for long-term payouts. If wind, solar, or hydro was seen by their hundreds and hundreds of economists and scientists as economically advantageous, they'd be all over it.

  4. Short battery life solved... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could this be the solution to the problem of short battery life in high-end notebooks?

    Yes, and with their safety record it could cause the problem of short user life in high-end notebooks.

  5. Solution to short battery life by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stop playing games on the company laptop.

  6. no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what we need is the ultimate fuel source, something from the future. then what we need to do is connect the whole world up to it using wireless electricity technology, and have wireless distribution stations so that the whole earth will be covered.

    then, and only then, will we truly have sufficient power for labtops

    1. Re:no no no by Kainaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you want to be very technical about it, we nearly have that. Most of the world is flooded with high-power radio signals. By "radio", I mean AM, FM, television, cell phone, GPS, and everything else.

      Tesla proved, repeatedly, that those signals could be caught in an antenna and turned into basic AC power. However, transmitting AC power through the air would mean that the power companies could not control how much electricity you used. So, there was a lot of propoganda, using Thomas Edison as a mouthpiece, to convince the world at large that transmitting radio waves would destroy the world - even calling transmitted AC waves "the devil's science".

      Now, we've built thousands of transmission towers. Why not tap into some of that power? Sure, you can't run a laptop on the power off one 900MHz antenna, but what if you had, say 500 of them in a little bundle? Even then, if you couldn't run the laptop off it, you could use the little power you did get to trickle charge the battery - making it last a lot longer.

      Before you get freaky ideas of humping around 500 antennas on your back, take note that an effective 900MHz antenna can be as little as half and inch long. If you arrange them like spokes on a wheel, you would have a 1-inch wide disk. Now, the trick is to fit the electronics to convert the AC signal into the same small package.

      I admit, this isn't the ultimate fuel source you requested, but it is a plentiful and untapped one.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    2. Re:no no no by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Free wireless electricity is already available in most parts of the world. It's called lighting.

    3. Re:no no no by rcw-work · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sure, you can't run a laptop on the power off one 900MHz antenna, but what if you had, say 500 of them in a little bundle?

      What makes you think 500 antennas in a little bundle would be measurably better than one?

      Even then, if you couldn't run the laptop off it, you could use the little power you did get to trickle charge the battery - making it last a lot longer.

      You have a very interesting definition of "a lot".

      take note that an effective 900MHz antenna can be as little as half and inch long.

      A half-wave dipole for 900mhz is about 6.5" long. You'll seriously decrease effectiveness by using something smaller.

      Now, the trick is to fit the electronics to convert the AC signal into the same small package.

      They make pretty small diodes these days... Why don't you make your own crystal radio and see for yourself how much power you can capture from radio? Hint: most RF field strength meters (which need batteries) report in microvolts per meter.

    4. Re:no no no by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      You have me intrigued. I'm checking Google right now, but I'm having some difficulty finding anything on this. Any useful links?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:no no no by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      Well, how would power companies decide where to radiate this power to? It wouldn't be very efficient to radiate it isotropically out into space. Also, at some frequencies, it may not be too healthy to have all that power radiating through the air. This presents similar, and probably more problem, than having a satellite in space beam power down to a collector. At least the satellite will be aiming for a fixed point. As far as the available power that exists out in the air now, I would imagine you will not be able to collect much (less than milliwatts). You seem to have the idea that if we just keep adding antennas we can keep collecting energy, which is not the case because energy would not be conserved.

    6. Re:no no no by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      You can find many pages with "Tesla transmit electricity". It was one of his more popular stunts. I have seen some pages that claim he powered a simple light bulb in London with a transmission tower in New York, but that seems a bit far-fetched to me.

      As for picking up power on a small antenna, I may have the frequency wrong. It is my understanding that most cell phones work at 900 MHz. Is that true? If so, I saw a television program on TLC, Discovery Channel, or the like that was trying to warn about terrible cancer-causing cell phones. I didn't believe most of what they said, but they did an experiment where they put a 1/2" antenna on a multimeter and placed it about a foot from a cell phone that was 'in conversation' - not just idly waiting for a call. The multimeter showed a clear increase in voltage. How much? I don't know. It was certainly small.

      Those two events made me think: Why can't we harness all the radio waves in the air for power? As you can see from the replies to my post so far, it appears that the antennas would need to be far larger than 1/2" to be effective and the use of such objects would essentially suck the radio waves out of the sky.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    7. Re:no no no by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      You seem to have the idea that if we just keep adding antennas we can keep collecting energy, which is not the case because energy would not be conserved.

      Please explain this further. Given this scenario: I'm in a gym listening to my walkman. A guy by me is listening to the same station. A few others tune into the same station. Is there a point at which nobody else can tune in because there's no more energy on that signal? My idea is that each antenna will provide some energy. Just like putting a bunch of batteries in series to increase voltage or parallel to increase amperage (is that correct?) you can put each mini-antenna-power-kit in series or parralel. But, two of them together will provide half the power that they would provide independently, that definately wouldn't be a benefit.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    8. Re:no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any idea how paltry the power available from these antenna bundles would really be?

    9. Re:no no no by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't believe you will see this effect for just a couple people, but eventually if there is a wall of antennas in front of another antenna, the power received at the back antenna will be significantly less than if that wall were not there. To consider this further, consider a 13.5 kW radio transmitter located ~18.6 miles (30 km) from where you are. Assuming it is an isotropic radiator, (I would imagine that radio station antennas can be considered close to that). The power density where you are due to that station is 1.9 microwatts/square meter. So to get even power on the order of a milliwatt, you would need to collect power from an area of about 500 square meters. Now, see if you can fill that gym with several of these 500 square meter collectors without blocking each other so you can your friends can get a few milliwatts of power.

    10. Re:no no no by BK425 · · Score: 1

      That's not a fuel source at all, it's a distribution system. It was Westinghouse who said "where would the meter go?", and while it's used by some to paint him as an evil capitalist it is an excellent point. Assuming it can be efficiently done, and you can overcome the folks who are currently afraid of unintended results from current electromagnetic fields... how do the people generating the power get paid?

    11. Re:no no no by hairykrishna · · Score: 0

      +5 interesting? The man displays an interesting lack of knowledge but that's about it.... The reason that power companies use wires rather than transmitting the power through the air is efficiency. God knows how much power you'd need to pump out of your transmitter before you could power your laptop off a dinky antenna but it'd be a shitload.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    12. Re:no no no by bechthros · · Score: 1

      Mr. Fusion, anybody?

    13. Re:no no no by bechthros · · Score: 1

      "Why can't we harness all the radio waves in the air for power?"

      Maybe because you can't create or destroy anything. When your device turns channel 4 into AC for you, don't you think other people might notice some loss of signal? Doesn't the FCC reg on the back of almost every home electronic device say "must not create unwanted interference"? Wouldn't this device be in pretty clear violation of that?

      IANARO (I am not a radio operator). However, I did buy one of those nifty little transmitters you can use to play cd's/mp3's on a walkman over radio waves for cars with no tape or cd players. It's powered by 2 AAA batteries, which it drains very quickly (still worth it tho), while instantly losing coherent signal if you move the transmitter more than a foot or so from the radio itself. Seems like the reverse would apply, but then IANARO... Maybe you could make a lot of AC from antennas right underneath giant transmitters (hey, wait a minute, that's where my house is located... hmm)

      Also, my memory is muddy, but wasn't Tesla found to be faking a portion of his supposed "demonstrations"?

    14. Re:no no no by ttsalo · · Score: 1
      You can find many pages with "Tesla transmit electricity".

      Tesla didn't plan on transmitting electricity through radio waves - he had a much weirder idea. He planned on moving so much charge from the earth to the toploads of his transmitting towers that it would cause a voltage swing of several volts in the "ground potential" all over the globe... (at several tens of kilohertz)

      --

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
    15. Re:no no no by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Ive come across a better, more dense power source. Its invisible, but you can see it, its all pervasive during the day, and I can charge 4 NiMh AA batteries in 8 hours using a 10x10cm collection device that cost 10 zorkmids at Maplins.

      I belive its called 'photonic energy' and is collected using a 'photovolatic device', the power source is a nearby 'stellar fusion orb'.

      Sounds pretty "Star Trek", but I assure you it works.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  7. Uh... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 5, Funny
    Call me a luddite, but I don't really want hot electronic components sitting next to pressurize, flamable gas.

    I like my pubic hair, thankyouverymuch.

    But seriously, will this be available in time for current computers (like my brand-new Powerbook) to be able to upgrade to a fuel cell power source?

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't really want hot electronic components sitting next to pressurize, flamable gas

      It's tooo easy. Tooooo easy.

    2. Re:Uh... by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But seriously, will this be available in time for current computers (like my brand-new Powerbook) to be able to upgrade to a fuel cell power source?
      If they are waiting for permission from organizatiosn such as the Avionics commission, and potentially other organizations (hazmat restrictions?) then you could be waiting for a few years. While this is a BLANKET guess on my part, we all know how quickly gov't organizations move.
      So you are still thinking PowerBooks will be called this in ten years? :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    3. Re:Uh... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, I'm *hoping* that the $3K I dropped for it will keep it reasonably capable for 10 years.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    4. Re:Uh... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Lets mod Paul's post as funny (mod +10? is this possible?) :)
      Wishful thinking? :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    5. Re:Uh... by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      More importantly, what will Apple call this?

      iPower? iBattery? iHindenburg? iBall?

    6. Re:Uh... by BrianGa · · Score: 1

      potentially other organizations (hazmat restrictions?)

      Shouldn't be too hard...we have plenty of other ORM-D consumer pressurized cylinders.

    7. Re:Uh... by op00to · · Score: 1

      I like my pubic hair, thankyouverymuch.

      Ugh, why do I have an image of every /.er as a joy of sex illustration now?

    8. Re:Uh... by VirtualWolf · · Score: 1
      So you are still thinking PowerBooks will be called this in ten years? :)
      Why not? They've been called PowerBooks for just under 13 years already. :)
  8. TCO? by Spaceman40 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lithium-Ion batteries only last so long before you have to replace them completely - I wonder if they can get these to be cheap enough to be economically competitive towards the other batteries.

    If they last longer, and the cost-per-hour of use turns out to be cheaper...

    --
    I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
  9. A friendly reminder from Smokey the Bear... by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    When using your MTI Micro Fuel Cell based laptop at the campgrounds, always practice safety. Surround your laptop with rocks to keep the fire from spreading. Be sure when you're done with your laptop to put it out with a bucket of water and make sure it has stopped smoking before you leave the area.

    Remember what Smokey the Bear says. Only you can prevent your MTI Micro Fuel Cell based laptop from starting a forest fire.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:A friendly reminder from Smokey the Bear... by srussell · · Score: 4, Funny
      Be sure when you're done with your laptop to put it out with a bucket of water
      Ah, you must not have read the announcement. These things produce their own water. The next obvious step is to construct a tiny internal fire suppression system.

      Actually, the sneaker benefit of this technology is that your laptop will steam-press your pants for your ... or, at least, the thighs of your pant legs.

    2. Re:A friendly reminder from Smokey the Bear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No longer can you take finger nail clippers and laptops onto a plane

      "Sorry sir, youre carrying a bomb under your arm"

  10. Hello, we're running out of money. by xtal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pardon me while I yawn. These things have been just around the corner for a LONG TIME. It seems they get "demonstrated" when there's a pressing need for more money, and then they go away for an undefined period of time.

    Call me when I can buy one for my powerbook.

    --
    ..don't panic
  11. It's bound to happen by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see someone cycling up to a petro-can Station pulling out a steaming laptop and yelling 'Filler up fast! I'm being slashdotted!'

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  12. Uh... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do I want an experimental fuel cell on my lap?

  13. Enlighten me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is this thing not rechargable? What does:

    "...are worth the expense of purchasing a new fuel cartridge every time the power runs out..."

    mean?

    How is this viable?

    1. Re:Enlighten me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fuel cartridge costs very little and gets recycled (prolly a in factory refill), for which you get a refund when returning it. Or atleast that is what common sense (water+methanol == cheap) and a few buisness plans tell me.

  14. Humidity by mratitude · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Since the hydrogen fuel cell biggest selling point is that the "exhaust" is largely nothing more than water vapor...

    ... won't the added humidity to the environment cause unintended climate effects, such as ruined $40 hairdo's and what about an added "rust factor" to externality calculations?

    --


    Mod me troll, if you must, I can't help it.
    1. Re:Humidity by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 1

      I didn't see a post mentioning humidity on here (or maybe I'm not looking hard enough). I also don't understand why this was flagged 'redundant'. Perhaps it was with the specific mention of hydrogen as the fuel cell. However, methanol is... CH3OH? I'm not sure how fuel cells work, but if pure hydrogen was stripped from said fuel, you would have CO left from it. Now, based on a combustion reaction, you get CO or CO2 (incomplete or complete combustion) and water. Again, I'm not sure exactly how a fuel cell works, but if there is water involved, I would be wary. Water (including vapor form, which raises humidity) generally has a detremental effect on electronics. My processor (Pentium-M) cools noticably slower in a humid environment. I guess it boils down to that water and electronics don't mix.

    2. Re:Humidity by pclminion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ... won't the added humidity to the environment cause unintended climate effects

      No, because the typical source of hydrogen is electrolyzed water. Hence you are simply recreating the water where the hydrogen came from in the first place. However, since it takes energy to split water, and that energy presumably came from fossil fuels, you are definitely causing an environmental impact.

      Also, burning hydrocarbons releases water as well as CO2. If the excess water had a large environmental impact, we would have noticed it by now. The CO2 is much more important in terms of environmental impact.

    3. Re:Humidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been some talk about hydrogen being a danger to the ozone layer, so if we wish to make a large scale hydrogen economy we may run into trouble. (Search google for links). However I don't that fuel cells for laptops are a serious threat.

      If I remember correctly laptops will run methanol. As part of the chemical process the methanol will be transformed into hydrogen. So the hydrogen leak will be very limited.

    4. Re:Humidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points, but I think the appropriate response to the grandparent post is,
      *LOL*

  15. RTFA it uses methanol for its hydrogen source.. by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm... Now where would one find methanol?

    I agree about the recharging being desireable. It sounds good but there's some more work to do on it.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:RTFA it uses methanol for its hydrogen source.. by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know how easily you could find methanol, but *ethanol* is darn easy to come by. :) The new teenage slogan would become, "No, mom, I swear, it's for my computer!"

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    2. Re:RTFA it uses methanol for its hydrogen source.. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
      To paraphrase Homer.

      One for the computer, one for me, one for the computer, one for me.....

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:RTFA it uses methanol for its hydrogen source.. by icejai · · Score: 1

      It's actually unfortunate that it doesn't run on ethanol.

      Methanol is toxic if ingested or inhaled.
      Metabolism of methanol changes it to formaldehyde (banned substance), and eventually formate. This will cause blindness if not treated immediately.

      And guess what the treatment is?

      Ingestion of ethanol!

      Ethanol binds more easily to the eye's receptors more readily than methanol. So once the ethanol binds to those receptors, it will in effect prevent anything else from binding.

      I would much rather they figure out a method to extract hydrogen from ethanol. Using methanol is a safety and health risk I'm not sure the majority of people would be willing to take. *Especially* if it's just to make their laptops and other gadgets last two times longer.

    4. Re:RTFA it uses methanol for its hydrogen source.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Go to a hardware store. Find a gallon. It's about $5 bucks.

      A better source would ethanol. Higher energy concetration. Easier to produce, and also comercially available (at hardware stores it's called denatured alcohol, it's ethanol with enough methanol to make it posionous.) Wouldn't want people to get drunk without paying taxes--so lets blind 'em!

  16. Longetivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now my dual 3.2Ghz EE Pentium 4 laptop time will triple to 8.3 minutes!

    1. Re:Longetivity! by theendlessnow · · Score: 3, Funny
      Now my dual 3.2Ghz EE Pentium 4 laptop time will triple to 8.3 minutes!

      You can hold it in your lap for 8.3 minutes??!! Who makes your underwear?

    2. Re:Longetivity! by loyalsonofrutgers · · Score: 1

      No joke... my friend is getting a laptop that weighs 17.5 pounds. It has desktop components in it. The battery doesn't so much as last anything as it does tear a hole in the space-time continuum.

    3. Re:Longetivity! by Cyberdork · · Score: 1

      It lasts for damn-near infinity then, if it rips a hole through the space-time continuum?

    4. Re:Longetivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, but it's one mighty short infinity.

  17. Yes, but what about cost? by TheAtomicElec · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article didn't seem to mention the cost of these new fuel cell batteries along with their refueling cartridges. I don't see anyone switching to new fuel cell batteries anytime soon unless the cost of the fuel cell and lots of refueling cartridges is approximately the same as a regular li-ion battery. Of course, the nice thing about this technology is that you would never actually need to plug anything in because the battery can't be recharged, just change the cartridge. Also raises the question of whether the fuel cartridges will be hot-swappable. Still, fuel cell batteries sound kewl. :)

  18. retro-fitting by musiholic · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What of the possibility to retro-fit fuel cells to existing laptop and palm devices? I would love to get a power source for my Zaurus that has more an ability to last, and not have battery memory / dead battery issues.

    --
    One Can Never Own Enough Musical Instruments...
  19. This was on /. once before by Murf_E · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have seen this on slashdot before but I can't seem to find it and am too lazy to keep looking. I guess this will be the same: no one wants a laptop called the hindenberg

    --
    this sig intentionally left blank
    1. Re:This was on /. once before by Murf_E · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/16/183521 8&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=137

      --
      this sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:This was on /. once before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't seem to find it and am too lazy to keep looking.

      Translation: You don't have hours and hours to go looking using Slashdot's crappy search engine.

      We don't blame you for that. Blaming you for not using Google and a site: reference is another story.

  20. Gas station for laptops? by lantius · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I like the idea of fuel cells for laptops and portable devices, but the obvious problem with them is obtaining fuel. We rather take it for granted that when the laptop battery runs low we can plug it in (or drop it into the charger) and within a few hours it is ready for portable use again. With a fuel-cell based solution you have to acquire new a new cartridge. It seems like the availability of fuel will directly tie to the uptake of these devices.

    Consider the typical office corridor worker, travelling to-and-fro with their tablet PC - do they really want to have to buy or refill a cartridge every day? Would it be practical to have multiple full cartridges on hand and refill them in bulk?

    I can see enjoying the option of one of these long life power units if I'm on a flight or in some environment where I need that much portable power without the opportunity to recharge, but it seems doubtful that fuel cells are going to make a major impact on portable electronics until the infrastructure solution is solved. Even still, the infrastructure exists for non-rechargable batteries, yet many people prefer devices that have modern rechargables - it just makes more sense for most situations.

    I believe fuel cells are an excellent technology, and a worthy replacement to traditional non-rechargeable batteries, but I find it unlikeley that they will supplant the current methods of use-and-recharge laptop, pda, and cellular batteries - it's just too convenient.

    1. Re:Gas station for laptops? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I would say that this technology won't replace the traditional batteries for laptops - but be an add-on enhancement. So for your everyday use, you will plug your laptop into the wall, and have its regular battary supply....but when you want to make an extended trip - where power outlets are not available (i.e. camping), then this is when you would use the battary. Or in an emergency (power outage's) where you still need to get your work done for the morning presentation.
      I do not think people will replace their relatively cheap and easily rechargeable batteries, for disposable ones. It will be a supplement.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:Gas station for laptops? by SpiritOfGrandeur · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine the taxes that they will put on this gas station here in Michigan. But then again that is what we need... more taxes...

  21. I'll belive it... by BearJ · · Score: 1
    When I see it commercially available at a reasonable price. It seems to me like there have been announcements galore over the past few years about portable fuell cells. I still can't walk into Best Buy and order up an HP pavillion with fuel cell power.

    And yes, I know about those Zinc-Air (I think) ones to recharge your cellphone.

    --
    Stand clear of the doors. The doors are now closing.
    1. Re:I'll belive it... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I'd think that this is the only market these batteries would have though. The emergency recharge market. Even in our current disposable society, it's still cheaper and easier to use LiIon batteries... $100 every few years for a new battery? $150? At only 2.5 times the charge a pop, and as much as I use my laptop, these better come in packs of 200 for a dollar. Otherwise, they're a money drain, not to mention a time drain... I don't want to shut down, change the battery, and then resume computing. I want to just plug it in and keep using it.
      All that being said, I can see the use in the military, and for emergency power, when I need to use my lappy and there just aren't any outlets around, or outlets that are compatible with my power supply, these would be a godsend.

  22. Methanol toxicity by DFJA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone thought about the fact that Methanol is highly toxic? I can see the headline:

    "Small child dies in tragedy involving laptop".

    I've not seen any discussion of this aspect of direct methanol fuel cells on the web, but it's an important one.

    --
    43 - For those who require slightly more than the answer to life, the universe and everything.
    1. Re:Methanol toxicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, we should stick with safe, nutritious lithium ion batteries.

    2. Re:Methanol toxicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about the children!!??!?

      Seriously, man. I think there are lot more dangerous chemicals in a typical household that are much more accesible to children than a laptop battery. I'd be more worried about my kids breaking into the liquor cabinet and drinking all my ethanol.

    3. Re:Methanol toxicity by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Anyone thought about the fact that Methanol is highly toxic? I can see the headline:

      "Small child dies in tragedy involving laptop".

      I've not seen any discussion of this aspect of direct methanol fuel cells on the web, but it's an important one.

      (shrug) Methanol is no more toxic than many houshold cleaners, and when sealed in a fuel cell it's probably a bit harder to get at. When's the last time someone let a child chew on their laptop battery? Even if we end up with bottles of methanol lying around, it'll certainly be no worse than having bottles of ammonia and bleach.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Methanol toxicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine tastes funny. Hey, who turned out the ligh...

    5. Re:Methanol toxicity by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      it'll certainly be no worse than having bottles of ammonia and bleach.

      I'm not sure what it is, but mixing bleach with stuff like ammonia or chlorine-free bleach makes some pretty nasty stuff. Also, if methanol were so dangerous, would I be able to spray copious amounts of the stuff on my car's windshield just by pressing a button?

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  23. Mmmm.... methanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wonder how long before people start cracking the top off the fuel chargers and start mixed it with coke... sure it may cause blindness, but there are a whole lot or reasons your laptop will make you go blind. (ba-dum-ching!)

    I can just see it now... tough board meeting, heading back on the train... cracking open your fuel cells for sweet sweet relief.

    Come on... people do it with whipped cream changers! Next best thing for the liquor-added geek?

    Now to find a way to power my laptop on vodka (like Bender!)

  24. also covered in NewScientist by grey1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    see New Sci home page, article is:

    • GIVE IT SOME GAS Ditch those flaky low-tech batteries: the miniature internal combustion engine is gearing up to power everything from laptops to cellphones p.26

    though of course you'll need to have paid money to read it...

    It does cover some useful stuff including the fact that any alternative to a bettery that produces even relatively small quantities of unpleasant exhaust won't be any fun in a small space - like an aeroplane cabin...

    --
    "we demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
    1. Re:also covered in NewScientist by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      GIVE IT SOME GAS Ditch those flaky low-tech batteries: the miniature internal combustion engine is gearing up to power everything from laptops to cellphones

      Internal combustion engines are heat engines and limited to carnot cycle efficiency. Fuel cells are not.

      This means that a laptop powered by a mini IC engine/generator package would be putting out at least four times as much heat as one powered by a fuel cell.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:also covered in NewScientist by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      This means that a laptop powered by a mini IC engine/generator package would be putting out at least four times as much heat as one powered by a fuel cell.

      Would take at least four times as much fuel, too. (There goes your time-between-refills.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  25. Indoor use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuel cells burn fuel (without an open fire, but the process is chemically identical). Laptops are normally used indoors, because that's where typical notebook work is and the displays don't work well in sunlight anyway.

    An average human being consumes about 80W, an average notebook uses somewhere between 15W and 30W. That is a significant increase in oxygen consumption per person+laptop.

  26. Airplane restrictions by 14erCleaner · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The article says:
    Several problems need to be worked out before fuel cells are a viable commercial technology, says Allen Nogee, principal analyst with InStat/MDR in Scottsdale, Arizona. For one thing, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has to decide if fuel cells will be allowed on airplanes, he says.

    Given the way laptops are used by business travellers, and where they generally need long battery life, this is probably a stopper for the whole thing.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Airplane restrictions by neurocutie · · Score: 1

      Since it is legal to carry bottles of gin or vodka on board (just not consume them), and also cigarette lighters, I don't see these fuel cells as being any different. Remember that they have been many documented cases of laptop and cell phone batteries shorting and burning up and yet these are all still allowable...

    2. Re:Airplane restrictions by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well since they already allow Butane lighters which are MUCH more explosive and they sell high proof Ethanol on tons of flights I can't see a reason to not allow Methanol fueled electronics.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  27. I can't wait...... by jwcorder · · Score: 1

    Until I can finally put a highly reactive substance in my laptop which gets so hot that I can't stand to place it in my lap. Sounds like a recipe for fun and profit.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    1. Re:I can't wait...... by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      highly reactive substance? as opposed to lithium?

      --
      Douglas P. Price
  28. Who needs gas when you can have a third rail? by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The solution for laptops on aircraft is so simple, nobody seems to be smart enough to urge its adoption: Put "power points" (lighter jacks) at all the seats. If you've got 13.8 VDC (with appropriate current limitations) you don't need a fuel cell; you don't even need a battery (though it's a good idea).

    Given the huge amount of power it takes just to stay in the air, I can't see a commercial airliner not being able to spare 30 watts per seat for hardware. The weight of wiring might be an issue, but if you run 110 VAC 400 Hz 3 phase down the aircraft and use switching converters at each row of seats that'll be minimal.

    1. Re:Who needs gas when you can have a third rail? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Most planes have this in first class, and almost all new planes have this at every seat.

      However, it is difficult to get permission to retrofit older planes, and therefore is not cost worthy.

      But as the planes continue to fall out of the sky, the replacements will have this kind of power.

  29. Should be plenty of open bars and liquor stores... by neurocutie · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The nice thing about "normal" batteries is that I can go to my hotel room and recharge them. The last thing I need to be doing is wandering around vegas at three in the morning trying to find some hydrogen to power my notebook for the big presentation in the morning.
    It should be possible to make a fuel cell that accepts ethanol as well as methanol... Plenty of places to get gin or vodka in Vegas at 3am...
  30. excess water by apachetoolbox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Over the course of the operating period, the amount of excess water released will not be noticeable to the user, he says.

    great, now laptops can pee on us :D

    1. Re:excess water by marnargulus · · Score: 1

      Maybe this water, while being a small amount, could help with cooling down the computer? I imagine it would evaporate and take some of the heat with it.

    2. Re:excess water by Epistax · · Score: 2, Funny

      You gotta see them piss after you put in ethanol instead of methanol.

      Oh and spelling errors everywhere, not to mention a terribly belligerent disposition.

    3. Re:excess water by kettch · · Score: 1

      In the old days if you were talking you yourself they threw you in the nuthouse. Now we have cell phone earbuds and bluetooth earpieces, and talking to yourself is a status symbol.

      Now, if you pee your pants you are laughed at and people find you disgusting. In the future, when we all have fuel cell powered laptops, a stain on one's crotch will be considered a status symbol.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    4. Re:excess water by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Anything, if it'll get rid of that damn paper clip!

      (doh, my OS is showing)

  31. Fuel cell hype by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When you read articles about fuel cells, note that some of these outfits don't have refueling worked out. Some are talking about "disposable" fuel cells.

    "Disposable" fuel cells have to be compared against primary batteries, not rechargeable ones. Rechargable batteries typically have about half the energy density of primary batteries. So claiming a 2.5x improvement in battery life for a nonrechargeable system is not a win.

    Ballard is further along than anybody else in larger fuel cells. Even they don't have much more than prototypes. Their attempt to market a fuel cell under the Coleman brand was a failure. The Coleman Powermate was launched with great fanfare in 2002, and never shipped. It's not clear what's wrong at Ballard. Their 1KW units should be providing backup power for cell phone sites and such, but it isn't happening.

    Ballard uses hydrogen in their fuel cells. Despite all the hype about the "hydrogen economy", Praxair, which sells hydrogen for fuel cells, has this to say:

    • Clean burning and not considered an atmospheric pollutant, hydrogen is fast becoming the energy source of the future. Questions regarding cost, safety and infrastructure, however, need answers before hydrogen-fueled engines go into wide use.

      Fuel cell grade hydrogen is specifically designed to be used as a fuel in fuel cell applications. It contains extremely low levels of impurities (e.g. ammonia (NH3), carbon monoxide (CO) and sulfur compounds) that can harm the catalyst-coated membranes inside the fuel cell.

      It is supplied in high-pressure cylinders and can only be used by industrial customers, like factories, laboratories, universities, and military and government installations. Typically, industrial customers already use compressed gases as part of their daily activities. Its use requires adequate ventilation and/or monitoring systems appropriate to the size of the location, helping ensure the safety of personnel when non-air gases are present.

  32. Missing the point? by DoctorDeath · · Score: 1

    They are going to be designed to plug in exterrnally (RTFA). So when you are near a regular outlet, just plug in the power cord. When you are travelling or otherwise away from an outlet you would have 2.5 times the power of using a standard dies in 30 minutes battery.

    --
    Sig temporarily out of service.
  33. Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by constantlyamazed · · Score: 1

    Aren't these people paying attention? We're running out of this stuff. -brian

    1. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by marnargulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, fuel cells run on hydrogen, which is the most plentiful gas in the universe. Which makes it more available than fossil fuels...

    2. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by fishybell · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh the ignorance, the ignorance.

      Almost all objects on the planet have large amounts of hydrogen in them. Hydrogen is not a fossil fuel, and being the most abundent material in the universe, we won't be running out of it any time soon.

      --
      ><));>
    3. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      our correct in your statement but your neglecting that most industrial hydrogen is made from and with fossil fuels. Granted you need to get the demand there then you can work on that but it's not realy a clean solution today it's just moving the polution to the factory/plant away from the car.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    4. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by constantlyamazed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was a brain-fart. I was answering the door just as I clicked 'submit' and right before my brain kicked in.

    5. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by bechthros · · Score: 1

      Ignorance nothin. This is redundant, by the way. Saying hydrogen is the most abundant substance in the universe is misleading. While technically true, the hyrdrogen we're probably most concerned with here on Earth is the hydrogen that's, well, here on Earth. Not a lot of it is just floating around in diatomic form due to it's reactivity (see also: Hindenburg). Most of that hydrogen exists in compounds with other elements. So how do you separate them? Frequently through combustion. Combustion requires combustible fuel. Or, as somebody smarter than myself once said, "For production in large scale commercial bulk hydrogen is usually manufactured by decomposing natural gas". The other way that's mentioned is putting acid on zinc. But that method isn't commercially viable, and if the acid in question has to be manufactured then you can bet electricity is probably involved in the process somewhere - electricity from where?

      Repeat after me, y'all: energy can be neither created nor destroyed. The supply side of the equation ain't changin anytime soon. There's a finite supply of oil, gas, and other things left behind by things that died millions of years ago. Guess that leaves the demand side, but even smarter-than-the-average-bear slashdotters seem loathe to reduce our energy consumption. But the unpleasant fact is it's not a matter of if, only of when.

      We are headed for a catastrophic energy withdrawal in this country that's gonna make crack look like cupcakes, and I'm not looking forward to it. Not one little bit.

    6. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by fishybell · · Score: 1

      It happens. Momma said they'll be days like this.

      --
      ><));>
    7. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by fishybell · · Score: 1

      My thought has always been "why hydrogen?" exactly because of those reasons. The biggest reason that we'll be running out of fossil fuels and other non-renewable resources soon (within 50 years) is not because we're consuming a lot, it's because of the rate at which we're consuming them is rapidly increasing. If we (mostly Americans/Japanese/Chinese/Europeans) were to switch over to more fuel efficient engines, reducing our rate of increase to 1-2%, we'd add an extra 100 years onto that timeline.

      --
      ><));>
  34. The next new thing... by Kyosuke77 · · Score: 1

    Laptop refueling stations! Fill 'er up with premium, Bob!

    --
    GET THEM INSIDE THE VAULT!
    1. Re:The next new thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if they'd design it reliant on a refilling infrastructure. That's risky business.

      Now, selling replacement batteries -- that's a proven cash cow.

  35. What about the other way??? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why dont we see lower power laptops?

    using current tech for low power consumption they could make a laptop that has say a 500-600mhz processor and a trans-reflective TFT display like that on PDA's as well as using a hard drive/ram/flash combo to give me 3-4 days run time.

    add to it by covering the lid in flexible solar panels and you would have a laptop that is useable by most people that will trickle charge from the lighting in the office or sunlight coming in the windows/ car windows/etc....

    not everyone needs a 2.8ghz Centrino with a super 3d video card + 10,000rpm laptop hard drive to do their daily tasks.

    granted this would mean that OS makers (Microsoft you hear me?) actually start making the OS smaller and faster... but there are times that I wish I could have a sub/sub notebook taking advantage of today's tech making weigh almost nothing with gobs of battery life.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:What about the other way??? by djeaux · · Score: 1
      Why dont we see lower power laptops? ...using current tech for low power consumption they could make a laptop that has say a 500-600mhz processor and a trans-reflective TFT display like that on PDA's as well as using a hard drive/ram/flash combo to give me 3-4 days run time.
      Really, 3-4 days run time would be a holy grail for present-day high-end PDAs let alone subnotebooks. The Palm Tungsten T3 & C handhelds both sport 400 MHz ARM processors, 64 MB RAM, etc. For my T3, 3-4 hours of run time is about it. I treat my T3 like a cellphone & recharge whenever I can. The upside is that the battery seems to recharge fairly quickly.

      I've heard that Sony is deprecating the Clié UX line in favor of its VAIO type U "superportable notebook." Gimme 3-4 days of run time on one of those mothers & I'd probably end up unemployed (for dereliction of duty)!

      A lot of folks with smartphones wouldn't mind 3-4 days of run time (not just standby) from a charge...

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    2. Re:What about the other way??? by danharan · · Score: 1
      Why dont we see lower power laptops?
      It's going to happen. And when it happens, it will be a very rapid change.

      As soon as one of those technologies becomes standard, the incremental benefit of adding another one increases.

      That is, suppose you have a good low-energy display like e-ink or whatnot; flexible solar panels start to make sense because people are more likely to use their laptops in bright areas. Or, if you have a good display and CPU, a change to a better HDD (+ram/flash) will be very significant for battery life.

      It seems all but inevitable that at least one of those technologies will be adopted before 2010. After that, the competitive pressure to adopt the rest will only increase.
      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    3. Re:What about the other way??? by bechthros · · Score: 1

      The usual business reason: There's no percentage.

      Nobody made smaller cars until people were made willing to buy them by the 70's energy crisis. Nobody will make low power laptops until there's a market that demands them, and nobody is. The only complaint that I've heard about overpowered laptops is sweaty theigh syndrome. Once you start hearing people complain about their electric bill because of their laptop, which *should* be when people start to alter their spending habits and start becoming interested in buying low-power laptops, then you'll see more low-power laptops making their way into the marketplace.

      The supply will not be widespread until the demand is - and then five years later it will probably be ubiquitous... just my $.02

  36. Strange.. this came to mind.. by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you.
    Venkman: What?
    Spengler: Don't /. the server.
    Venkman: Why?
    Spengler: It would be bad.
    Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean "bad"?
    Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously, and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
    Stantz: Total protonic reversal!
    Venkman: Right, that's bad. Okay, alright, important safety tip, thanks Egon.

  37. Waiting... by AWHITEMAN · · Score: 0

    Still waiting for my micro fusion reactor power laptop.

    --
    -- Note to liberals, yes please flee to Canada.
    1. Re:Waiting... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      bah, I'm waiting for my homelite laptop 2 cycle battery with pull start.

      I can see it...

      Man holding laptop in one hand and violently jerking the pull start handle over and over....

      pbbbbt.....pbbbt.....pbbbt.... CRAP! I fouled the plug. anyone got a laptop socket wrench and a can of ether?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Waiting... by AWHITEMAN · · Score: 0

      Or you could just get a Husqvarna...

      --
      -- Note to liberals, yes please flee to Canada.
  38. Practicality. by Reeses · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, maybe it's me, but it seems that no one has thought about the practical implicaitons of how this works.

    1) Take the idea of carrying your LiIon battery, and compact charger, throwing it away, and basically replacing it with the equivalent number of AA batteries needed to make a business trip.

    1a) Now think about how much your back is going to hurt after dealing with that much weight in an airport.

    2) OK, now take that thought, replace those AA batteries with something that's full of liquid, flammable liquid at that, and carry enough of those to power your laptop for a week long business trip.

    3) Disposal of the spent cartridges. And the fact that this thing spits out steam (euphemistically called water vapor in the article) right near delicate electronic components. Does it have an exhaust pipe to make sure that you don't get condensation all over your expensive computer bits?

    4) How does this really help? It might be cool to do for disposable batteries. I'd love to be able to get longer life in my flashlight with a battery like this, but not in my laptop with those kind of limitations.

    --
    Reeses
    1. Re:Practicality. by marnargulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the idea isn't that it will complete replace batteries immedietely, but rather supplement them for persons needing an extended time with out a charge. When I go on trips I usually need to bring along a power converter to change 12 volt car power to my laptop 110 volt charger. I would gladly have spent more on my laptop to not have the hassle of all those wires, the same way I spent a little more to get wireless instead of plugging in.

    2. Re:Practicality. by Reeses · · Score: 1

      True. But I'm just projecting it a little further.

      Assuming you're getting 1.5 hours out of a charge now. 2.5x that is 3.75 hours. Then what? you've got an empty, spent cartridge you can't refill. You may not be able to buy a new one, because it's not likely that a notebook manufacturer will settle on a standardized battery shape and size, and our local convenience store will only carry so many brands and sizes. You'll still need to carry all your power peripherals with you, because you'll have to revert back to your battery when the fuel cell runs out.

      Electricity is essentially free, whereas replacing these fuel cells are liable to cost $30 each, at the bare minimum.

      --
      Reeses
    3. Re:Practicality. by marnargulus · · Score: 1

      The actual fuel container might not be reusable/refillable, but what is stopping them from using a tapable mini-keg (in whatever generic shape they agree on), that slips into the fuel container the laptop company chooses? Similar to the cartridges for air guns, those aren't reusable, but they aren't price ineffecient either.

    4. Re:Practicality. by Reeses · · Score: 1

      And how are you going to get this thing through aiport security?

      --
      Reeses
    5. Re:Practicality. by marnargulus · · Score: 1

      If you can get an exploding cell phone battery through security, they won't stop fuel cells. The cell phone battery is also much more likely to be a danger too.

    6. Re:Practicality. by bechthros · · Score: 1

      "Electricity is essentially free"

      wow, you've obviously never lived anywhere close to a coal plant. *Nothing* is free, especially when you consider how electricity's very "freeness" has turned consumers into dope fiends, using more and more and more and hey, just a little more...

      the cost of the crash, in dollars and lives, when the dead shit in the ground runs out, will be staggering, I'm afraid.

      I'm remembering the Bloom County strip, circa mid-80's when gas got really cheap, of an old man pulling up to a filling station attendant (remember those?) and saying, "Hell, fill up the trunk! It's CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP!"

      Been to the pump lately?

      No, nothing is free, and to think that that's even possible is very risky thinking to my mind. Call me crazy.

  39. At least... by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... this could give a new meaning to "CPU burning"

  40. with the DCMA? by oneiros27 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The article specifically said that this company was not working on user-fillable fuel cells ... so these things will probably go the way of toner and ink cartridges:
    • other companies make a compatable form-factor
    • original company starts changing the form factor on a regular basis
    • other companies make refill kits
    • original company adds software so the cartridge thinks its empty
    • someone makes a 'tool' to convince the cartridge otherwise
    • original company sues person under the DCMA
    Okay, that's not exactly the timeline with the previous ones, but I'd expect something similiar ... don't think you're going to be able to just recharge these things from a can like for butane lighters.

    You'll go to the store, and have to buy company X's model to it your machine, but the store will be all out, because company X is having a supply problem, and no one else has a comporable model. [case in point -- I got the third to the last pack of AA batteries at the CVS near my house last week....out of 12 or so hooks of Duracell, Energizer, generics, in 4/8/12 packs, they had 2 packs of generics left after I left... I have no idea why they were that low (they could've had more in back, I didn't ask).

    If it's some proprietary format, I'm just not optimistic about finding a new battery when mine goes dead.
    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:with the DCMA? by name773 · · Score: 1

      well, that's only if the world doesn't end first.... but if you're going to be optimistic, i'll bet people will keep using rechargeable batteries if these fuel cells can't be recharged. and somewhere down the line someone will make a user-friendly rechargeable version of these fuel cells, because they have a lot of potential (energy)

      I got the third to the last pack of AA batteries at the CVS

      you can download batteries???

    2. Re:with the DCMA? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good open source project to me... :)

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  41. mirrored by lart2150 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I saved a copy because it looked like the server was going down http://students.depaul.edu/~bengert/fule/0,aid,116 591,00.asp.htm

  42. Just try getting this through security!! by Banner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somehow I just don't see you being allowed to take this onboard an airplane, or even allowed through security with it. Bad enough it gives of gasses, but it's full of a flamable liquid?

    Can you say 'bomb'?

    (Doesn't matter if it can be made to explode, we're talking about the same people who confiscate nail clippers)

    1. Re:Just try getting this through security!! by InfraredEyes · · Score: 1

      Well, technically, any sealed battery such as the lithium-ion that you probably have in your laptop, can be called a "bomb". In early lithium-ion cells it was possible to generate highly reactive lithium metal "dendrites" or needle-like structures if the charging cycle was not controlled correctly. These could puncture the the battery separator to create a short circuit, leading to heat, leading to a pressure build-up, and all this in the presence of highly volatile and flammable ether-like electrolytes... you get the picture. So, I don't necessarily think that a methanol fuel cell would be more dangerous than any other high-density method of storing energy. The real catch with fuel cells is that they are open systems (fuel and air in, exhaust out) as opposed to the sealed batteries we are used to. This could make them more hazardous, and it could certainly make them more difficult to get through airport security, as you point out.

  43. not H2, methanol by fatray · · Score: 1

    These fuel cells use methanol, not hydrogen.

    The bad news is that the article implies that these cells are closed units, designed to not be refuelable by the user. Disposable fuel cells have been proposed before, so this is not a new idea. (of course it will be about a week before someone posts on the web a method for drilling a hole in the cell, pouring out the water and refilling with methanol, and finally covering the hole with duct tape) I think the lawyers are worried about the liability of geeks sloshing around methanol.

    I can't see me spending $50 to run my laptop for 5 hours and then throwing away the fuel cell.

    1. Re:not H2, methanol by ndrw · · Score: 1

      It's totally ridiculous to throw these things away, we need LESS WASTE, not MORE!! I would love to buy a re-usable fuel cell for my laptop, but I will NEVER buy one that gets thrown away after it is used.

  44. 2.5x means nothing by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    With processors eating up more and more power just to run them, and running hotter all the time, a lot of any new power coming on line will get dumped into the coolant / refrigerant technologies (compressors suck up a lot of juice too...)

    Batteries (and power technology in general) are so far behind the curve, it's really pretty sad. Moore's Law may be on a vacation in chip land, but it's pretty much closed up shop in the world of battery and power storage.

    In a world of cheap oil - who cares?

    I'm surprised we don't have kick start deisel laptops... Urrr- that's right - I forgot - that was the Soviet idea of powering a laptop...

    RS

    HW

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:2.5x means nothing by bechthros · · Score: 1

      "I'm surprised we don't have kick start deisel laptops... Urrr- that's right - I forgot - that was the Soviet idea of powering a laptop... "

      Aiken's too. We're so used to thinking of processor cycles as electronic operations we forget the fact that the Mark I's "cycles" were RPM's of a drive shaft. Powered by a gasoline burning internal combustion engine.

    2. Re:2.5x means nothing by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      No, no, and no.

      1) The laptop powers you, you insensitive overlord.

      2) ????

      3) Profit!!!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  45. dongs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, dongs

  46. At the convenience store or... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    You can usually find methanol anywhere they sell fondue supplies... convenience stores, hardware stores, some grocery stores, etc.

  47. and by Squiddl3 · · Score: 1

    and then you can put all wireless transmissions in the trashcan, cause all the signalpower is lost due to mobile 2.8GHz Radeon 9800 gaming mobiles... ...who are "taking" all signal power they can get

    you can't get energy from somewhere sbd has to provide it.

    and why schoul sbd steal only frequencies that are allowed, the energy frequencys from the power companies if he can take all? Maybe you can pay for YOUR frequency, but why should you not take others

    I don't thin that sbd will provide enrgy for nothing

    I know he whe has to have a good antenna, meaning for the right frequency, but he can "steal" from other frequencies nevertheless

    Also I think its not good to send 1KW through my brain...

  48. Re:Should be plenty of open bars and liquor stores by neurocutie · · Score: 1

    Indeed these will actually give a reason for geeks to raid the mini-bar...

  49. Recharging a fuel cell is easy by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0, Informative

    Just run it backwards. It's basically electrolysis/hydrolysis, after all.

  50. TSA allow it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the TSA allow these fuel cells on airplanes? I wonder if they would be considered "flameable fuel". http://asi.faa.gov/these.asp

  51. Methanol by Spazmania · · Score: 3, Informative

    From: http://www.c-f-c.com/gaslink/pure/methanol.htm

    Methanol: A colorless, flammable liquid with an odor repulsive pungent. Shipped and stored in dissolved acetone. Can decompose spontaneously if pressure exceeds 15 PSIG.

    Hazards: A toxic substance. Irriatates eyes and causes dizziness, nausea and is a possible carcinogen.

    Yeah, I'm going to carry a bottle of that onto a post-9/11 jetliner.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Methanol by BerntB · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I'm going to carry a bottle of that onto a post-9/11 jetliner.
      They will today provide you similar things on a jetliner. It's called whiskey.

      (OK, whiskey isn't stored in acetone -- but it smells and taste like it.)

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  52. Also solves the recharging problem on airplanes by bburdette · · Score: 1

    Just order up a couple mini bottles. "No, I dont' need a glass."

  53. Re:Great ! Really? by freeduke · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, so now, let's face another problem: Instead of looking for petroleum, we have now to find a way to get methanol and hydrogen.

    As methanol is made of Carbon, Oxygen and Hydrogen atoms, a common mean to get some is from... Petroleum!

    For hydrogen, easy, just take some water, some electricity, and separate Hydrogen from Oxygen. But, where do we get electricity? Sometimes from petroleum, often from nuclear plants...

    So before everything else we should better develop cleaner ways for producing our electricity.

  54. Re:Should be plenty of open bars and liquor stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about all those states with stupid laws against selling alchohol after 2am or on Sundays?

  55. 2.5x? How about 25x? or 250x? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    I would like to point out how rapid the battery consumption really is. My laptop runs about 3-4 hours on the battery, which I considered to be pretty good, until I thought about my little radio. Granted, it is not nearly as complicated, but it uses 2 AAA batteries about every 2-3 WEEKS of 2-3 hours per day use. Come on, now. Where is that kind of power? Is it very expensive at the wattage/space/heat we need, or is it not available by any means?

    --
    stuff |
  56. I don't think so, and here's why: by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Take a typical FM broadcast tower. Say, DC101 in the DC-metro area. 22.5 kWatts. That power is spread out over the entire surface area of the region. Some tens of hundreds of square miles. And the inverse-square law is a bitch. Your antenna will receive the tiniest fraction of a watt. It's a good thing your radio tuner or cellphone has a filter and amplifier to do something with it.
    You definitely can't get usable juice from that.
    No, son, if you were being irridated with narrow band EM waves that were incident in such a fashion to be able to power a laptop (say, 50 watts), without a parabolic antenna, you'd be blind, or dead. This is how microwave ovens work (in the 802.11b range, no less)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  57. [%random_word] $4V3 0N M3TH4NO1 by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Yeah. The thing that bothers me is the thought of being asked to pay $10 for a $0.15 plastic container filled with $0.05 worth of methanol.

    You won't have to look hard to find this stuff, it'll be the next offer spammers bombard you with. Probably filling containers (made by some shady outfit in SE Asia which could give a rat's patoot about patents or copyrights) with drugstore rubbing alcohol and tap water (watch those calcium deposits!) in their bathrooms in finer trailer parks everywhere.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  58. Reminds me of Ghostbusters by rufu · · Score: 1

    That scene from Ghostbusters, where they are in the elevator and they turn the back packs on for the first time.

    I can see it now, you go to switch you laptop on everone in the room backs off.

  59. Richolson's Law by gricholson75 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hereby announce Richolson's Law:
    Whenever an article mentioning laptop computers, parts for laptop computers, or any accessory pertaining to laptop computers is posted to Slashdot, the chances someone will link to the Register article about the man who burnt his penis with his laptop approaches 1.0.

  60. No, it will be vapor... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    It won't be generated fast enough to form droplets, it'll subliminate (unless the room's temperature was below it's dewpoint, but then you shouldn't be using your laptop in those conditions anyway... heh)

    The heat transfer would be equally negliable.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  61. (Scratches head) by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

    Ok... Maybe I need a science lesson here.

    Fuel cells convert hydrogen and oxygen into water, right?

    Electrolysis converts water into hydrogen and oxygen... right?

    So why is "finding a source of hydrogen" so difficult? Can't you just use the waste water or tap water in your hotel room to electrolysis yourself some Hydrogen?

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:(Scratches head) by neurocutie · · Score: 4, Informative
      Most of the fuel cell prototypes proposed for laptop use and similar run on methanol, not hydrogen. This is probably because it is obviously much easier to deal with a few ounces of fluid fuel rather than a high pressure compressed tank of hydrogen. It would be lunacy to allow an average consumer to deal with a tank of compressed hydrogen that has the potential of venting into open air.

      So similarly, even if a hotel would foolishly allow you to crack tap water to produce hydrogen and oxygen in your hotel room in the quantities needed without causing a fire or explosion, how would you propose to carry around these gases ? You would need a good, portable compressor to fill up a tank.

      I think if you thought about it a bit, you'd realize that supplying and storing alcohols is much more simple and practical than hydrogen, for the same reasons that this whole "hydrogen economy" notion has so many problems of practicality that it will probably never happen and that biofuels (alcohols, biodiesel, etc) are much more likely.

    2. Re:(Scratches head) by egomaniac · · Score: 2, Informative

      In addition to the difficulties already pointed out, electrolysis of water is a very inefficient process. The electricity it takes to generate a certain amount of hydrogen via electrolysis vastly exceeds the amount you get back by turning that hydrogen into water.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    3. Re:(Scratches head) by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      That I knew. Sure electrolysis is inefficient, but I don't really think efficiency is one of the prime factors when considering a battery charger. Mostly you're concerned about how much charge the battery takes, and the amount of time required for the recharge.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    4. Re:(Scratches head) by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      That I knew. Sure electrolysis is inefficient, but I don't really think efficiency is one of the prime factors when considering a battery charger. Mostly you're concerned about how much charge the battery takes, and the amount of time required for the recharge.

      Most people care very much about cost. If it takes (say) energy comparable to running your oven for three hours just to charge your laptop battery, people are going to be wary.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  62. boo fuel cells by MDFedderly · · Score: 1

    we need cold fusion!

    really though, it seems to me that all technologies that are not the 'holy grail' are not a permanent solution to the problems. as processors get faster, they'll use more energy and create more heat. same with everything else in the laptop...

    I guess what they say is right though,
    there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem.

  63. Apple's already solved (part) of this by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 1

    Could this be the solution to the problem of short battery life in high-end notebooks?

    I have what many would describe as a high-end notebook, a PowerBook G4. I get about three hours on a charge. I can watch an entire DVD and all the trailers, etc., and still have at least a half-hour of battery left afterwards. If I were miserly--bump all power savings, dim the screen, and spend all my time in vi in the Terminal--I'm sure I could get four hours without trouble.

    I'm sure other manufacturers must be able to do the same, if they want.

    Cheers,

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:Apple's already solved (part) of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the battery was brand new, I got six doing that. I still can get about four and a half.

  64. Heh by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

    Before you get freaky ideas of humping around 500 antennas on your back, take note that an effective 900MHz antenna can be as little as half and inch long

    Sometimes the jokes just write themselves...

  65. Difficult to retrofit? by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
    There's a good business in refitting aircraft of all types, from airliners all the way down to single-engine piston planes. There is already wiring to all seats in modern airliners for the sound system; there appears to be no reason that seats with alternative wiring (power instead of audio, and feed audio over lighter cabling using SPDIF or the like) could not be STC'ed[1] and the old wiring channels re-used for power. Replacing the seats would also let the airliners do something about the low crashworthiness of the older styles (they pull loose in impacts which would otherwise be survivable).

    [1] Supplemental Type Certification, which is an addendum to the aircraft's original FAA Type Certification. I'm sure that someone installs something requiring an STC into an aircraft in the US several times a day.

    1. Re:Difficult to retrofit? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Not right now, there's not. The companies are running razor-thin margins as it is (if they have a profit at all), and retrofitting means removing a plane from the active inventory. Now, this is done periodically anyway for major overhauls, but this is still an additional cost of probably several tens of thousands of dollars, if not a couple hundred thousand dollars, per plane to replace all of the seats and run the new wiring.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  66. What about traveling? by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

    So what do you do if you have a fuel cell powered laptop and you want/need to fly?

  67. Wireless Electricity by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 1

    Forgive me if my knowledge in transmitted waves is a bit incomplete, but how and which ranges would you receive with these antennas/antennae? Would you focus on ones that are multiples of 60Hz because of the alternating nature of AC? I do like this idea, though. Imagine having one of these arrays and being able to plug it into your power plug on your computer or directly into the battery to supplement the power. On the other hand, what about heat engines (from the processor or hard drive to somewhere cooler) or having solar panels built into the chassis to augment power? Just some thought into alternative/supplemental power sources for laptops.

  68. What memory effect by lcsjk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't remember anything about that!

  69. Glucose based fuel cells by joncrie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The NYTimes (reg. req'd) has a report about ongoing research on glucose-based fuel cells. Maybe instead using batteries, we'll soon just plug our laptops into our arms.

    1. Re:Glucose based fuel cells by yeremein · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe instead using batteries, we'll soon just plug our laptops into our arms.

      Sounds great! Eat junk food, play Quake, and lose weight all at the same time! Crank up the resolution and effects to burn the most calories.

      Heck, I should apply for a patent on this.

  70. Finally I can use it... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    For what it was intended for... not bieng plugged into a wall constantly.

    I don't know about the rest of you, but my laptop craps out after 20 mins of computing. Running no other apps but a programming IDE, no high end graphics just a text editor. All this plus 20 minutes of computing time from a laptop and battery that are supposed to operate for more than 2 hours.

    This is the 3rd battery also.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  71. Oh, Just Great... by feloneous+cat · · Score: 1

    Last thing I need is a laptop that pees in my lap. That's what my cat is for.

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  72. Allow me to be pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smokey Bear, as in Mr. Bear, Smokey

  73. Use U-235 by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    A single aspirin-sized pellet of U-235 could power your laptop for 20,000 years. No wimpy Centrinos, but a big honkin' full-strength 43.8-watt Pentium IV. The ability to burn DVD's directly, and I do mean burn. A simple 20-pound lead plate integral with the back of the case provides your lap with thermal and other protection, as well as looking cool. Waste disposal? No problem, nobody's going to throw one away when it still has 19,997 years of useful life in it.

    1. Re:Use U-235 by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A single aspirin-sized pellet of U-235 could power your laptop for 20,000 years.

      I realize you're joking, but lest some of the Slashbots around here take this as insightful commentary:

      1) Unlike plutonium, U-235 is not radioactive enough to be used as a heat source for a thermoelectric generator.

      2) A small pellet of U-235 cannot generate electricity via nuclear processes. You need a critical mass in order to sustain fission, which is a minimum of around 15 kg in the case of U-235.

      3) Nuclear reactors are really just steam-driven turbines which use nuclear fission as the heat source. You could generate power just as easily by lighting a big fire and using it to boil water (and in fact that's exactly what fossil fuel plants do). Obviously, this isn't something that can be scaled down to portable sizes.

      4) You don't need anything approaching 20 pounds of lead to shield you from uranium's radioactivity. You wouldn't want to swallow it, but you could hold a bare pellet of U-235 in your hand perfectly safely, and a paper-thin layer of lead would completely block its radioactivity. The massive shielding around nuclear powerplants is primarily there to protect us from the neutrons generated during fission, which are very difficult to stop.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:Use U-235 by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

      Definitly not U-235, but find an equivalent sized piece of antimatter... Actually, a piece of antimatter that big could blast the shuttle into space. I guess simply converting about half of that U-235 to energy will be enough... After all, E does equal mc^2...

    3. Re:Use U-235 by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Regarding light rad shielding, have you noticed this?

  74. gasoline/petrol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now, as with any fuel, we must wait for the British to come up with a completely different name for it.

  75. Rechargeable fuel cells? by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the most reasonable solution would be to design a sealed-case hydrogen fuel cell with three compartments, one for water, one for hydrogen, and one for oxygen (if the gasses have to be stored separately-I'm not sure). When all the hydrogen and oxygen have been converted to water, you plug it in, and the water is split back into oxygen and hydrogen by electrolysis.

    Has anyone built such a device? Are they impractical for some reason (too large, too heavy, too expensive, difficult to manufacture, etc...)?

    -jim

    1. Re:Rechargeable fuel cells? by msmikkol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, reversible fuel cells have not been left without attention, but there are some problems, both electrochemical and mechanical. First, the catalyst used for the cell can't be carbon supported platinum, which is the best for hydrogen fuel cells, since electrolysis happens in a potential region(*) where carbon is oxidized. Therefore, a non-carbon supported catalyst or a non-supported catalyst is needed and the search is still on.

      Second, storing the hydrogen might be a problem. Pressurized container are bulky and require additional components, e.g. compressors, and chemical storage systems, for example metal hydride containers are heavy and expensive.

      For most uses, there is no need to store oxygen. There's enough oxygen in air, and air is readily available in most use environments.

      * Yes, you can split water at a potential, which is under the oxidation potential of carbon, but reaction kinetics at that potential are not favorable, i.e. too slow. Therefore, practical electrolysis requires a higher potential.

      --
      The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.
      -Bertolt Brecht
  76. RE: OMG - tech. turned into Bush bashing?? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll be the first to say I'm not a huge supporter of President Bush - but the parent poster's statement is questionable at best, and more likely pure FUD.

    Hydrogen is being focused on as the "future" right now simply because it shows the most potential. We've already been through the whole superconductor thing, which turned out to largely be a fiasco. We have a pretty good handle on such energy sources as nuclear power and solar power, and already know where/when to use them, and where/when they're not really viable.

    Yes, there might be a more immediately usable power source for automobiles in such things as producing fuel from plants, but the numbers I've seen run on this indicate it's not practical as a way to really migrate all of the U.S. cars and trucks away from petroleum products. (Farmers can't grow enough soybeans and other crops to supply all the demand we currently have for oil, even if you could magically convert every motor vehicle to run on these types of alternate fuels overnight.)

    I believe it was well over a year ago, Slashdot linked to a story about people driving around an experimental hydrogren fuel cell powered van in the Chicago area. This technology isn't "pie in the sky". It's basically workable, and shows results for the money put into the research. I think it has little or nothing to do with some conspiracy theory about Bush backing it to protect the oil companies.

  77. Now it'll be great... by FaasNat · · Score: 1

    ....to see them make one for the iPod.

    --
    There's never enough when you have too little
  78. You missed the point by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1

    The old seat designs are nowhere near as good as they ought to be, and retrofitting ought to be mandatory in any event. No one airline would gain a competitive advantage if all of them had to upgrade, and the cost of wiring improvements in the seats themselves would be lost in the noise.

  79. Re: OMG - tech. turned into Bush bashing?? by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1

    Your right. I'm sure that if tomorrow, Bush announced a new plan for viable fusion energy production, the anti-Bush zealots on /. would cook up yet another conspiracy theory linking him to so-called "Buddies in Big Oil".

  80. Re: OMG - tech. turned into Bush bashing?? by belchingjester · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If we're talking about point-of-use emissions, then yes, hydrogen is the way to go. The issue is, how do we get the hydrogen. With our current technology, the most likely way of getting hydrogen will be refining fossil fuels, so it does indeed benefit the oil industry. The combination of hybrid/energy recapture systems and more efficient energy conservation measures (like LED lights for instance) with hydrogen may serve to improve matters, but that's not where GM, Ford et al are heading. Refined methanol/ethanol/etc. I'm guessing will be far more expensive per joule of energy than gasoline currently is, so conservation remains a concern. Re: power usage/demands, you have a point - nothing else is viable right now. Clearly that's why the US government should spend 100 times as much subsidizing oil production as it does to stimulate research of alternative energy sources such as photoelectric, wind, etc.

  81. Forget fuel cells, use the alternative by panurge · · Score: 3, Funny
    In the real world, fuel cell powered cars are always on the horizon, but for sheer fuel efficiency the good old direct injection Diesel is still winning. Works brilliantly on boats, and recharges my laptop in the car via an inverter.

    The obvious answer is a tiny Diesel engine. It'll probably be commercialised faster, it will run nicely on rapseseed oil, which you can carry on airplanes, and the coolness factor would be enormous. The Powerbook would doubtless have some six-cylinder BMW design with engine management and a titanium-clad alternator, while Dell would have some two-pot Chinese job that emitted black smoke while starting. Of course, the plane could still run out of salad dressing on the way to a convention, and the filler better not look too much like a hypodermic.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  82. You know about the 120 char limit on sigs, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Curiosity, like coffee, is an acquired need. Just a titillation at the beginning, it becomes with training a raging passion. -- Nicholas S. Thompson "

  83. Winner? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Maybe their fuelcell can win the efficient power supply contest.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  84. Bah. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, 2.5x the heat is nothing compared to the heat of an explosion of a fuel cell on your gonads.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Bah. by pecko666 · · Score: 1

      Fuel cells do not burn the fuel !! Electricity production is purely chemical process.

    2. Re:Bah. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Most explosions are purely chemical processes.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  85. I concur. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    I know, I have the same problem with my cigarette lighters. They keep running out of butane and the last thing I need to be doing is wandering around at night trying to find some butant to power my cigarette lighter.

    :-)

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  86. The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by coyotedata · · Score: 0

    And You Want To Recharge Them Too!!!

  87. I am not a crook by Richard+D.+Bartlett · · Score: 1

    Cans of compressed methanol + increased airport security = ?

  88. Re: OMG - tech. turned into Bush bashing?? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Fuel cells are energy storage devices. There will be no big hydrogen fuel cell plant producing hydrogen for smaller fuel cells. The best way to do fuel cells is build nuclear power plants everywhere, then, produce hydrogen with all that electricity at night.

    --
    This is my sig.
  89. Plane Crashes Due to Laptop by aviationwiz · · Score: 1

    In other news, the NTSB has released it's analysis on the downing of flight AB852. It appears that a laptop running off of a fuel cell started running a little hot, lit the foldable tray on fire, and the fire spread from there throughout the entire fuselage, before burning off the wings, where the plane fell into a steep dive and crashed into the Pacific Ocean.

  90. Recharge them everywhere by j0kkk3l · · Score: 1

    If these things are constructed correctly you could fill them up with vodka for example. That should not be so hard to find at 3 o'clock in the mornig in Las Vegas. You can buy alcohol nearly everywhere at low prices. If they only made them in a way you can refill them yourself. But possibly they are as coles as printer cartridges.

  91. Methanol vs Ethanol by morie · · Score: 1

    In the Netherlands, this is a well known way for drunks to get their alcohol:

    They report to a hospital with (deliberate) methanol poisoning. They have to be treated to ethanol right away, and (otherwise fortunately) in the Netherlands you will not be asked for insurance in an emergency situation, but just be treated.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  92. I'm surprised this is still at +5 Interesting... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    ...because it isn't.

    Mods, this is OVERRATED. The guy hasn't even the slightest notion of EM or RF theory.

    It's just NOT feasible. I mean, this is the same thing as saying... why can't I power my laptop using the light radiated by all the lightbulbs in my room? If you think about the irridated power of each lightbulb vs. the draw of the laptop, you'd have to cover every square inch of the lit room with photocells to gather it all back up. And you'd need an extreme excess surplus of wattage from the light bulb because of efficiency losses in conversion (both into and from light), and atmospheric losses to consider too.

    Why not turn off that 4000W searchlight, and just plug in the damn laptop?

    We don't have a natural equivalent of the Sun in the radio range... there just isn't enough power in any (nay, all) of the shorter-length frequencies in any reasonable outdoor area to do anything constructive with, other than maybe operating the earpiece on a crystal radio, or lighting up an RFID tag.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  93. Fuel Cell recharges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MTI have already announced Duracell will be supplying Fuel Cell packs.

    The Fuel Cells use Methanol not Hydrogen.