Slashdot Mirror


Superman Set To Fly

arock99 writes "After many years of battling various script rewrites, Superman is set to soar again. Various sources (superman-v.com, darkhorizons.com, aintitcool.com) report that Brandon Routh (of Gilmore Girls) has been cast as Superman. With production only a month away, Brian Singer is set to tackle yet another super-hero film after previously having directed both X-Men and X2. Had it not been for his recent passing, Christopher Reeve would surely have been part of the production team in some capacity. Superman should hit theaters around summer 2006."

316 comments

  1. Brandon Routh? by sofakingon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who the heck is this guy? Gillmore Girls? C'mon now, why not use the guy from smallville or something. I mean how many supermen can we have? Not that anyone can top Christopher Reeve, may he rest in peace.

    1. Re:Brandon Routh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That chick, and the mother, from gilmoure girls is hawt++

    2. Re:Brandon Routh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god that guys looks dumb, agree they should have gotten the guy from Smallville.

    3. Re:Brandon Routh? by eingram · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also: s/supermen/batmen/

      Anyone have a running tally for both? :D

    4. Re:Brandon Routh? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not that anyone can top Christopher Reeve, may he rest in peace

      He was a good Superman, but Dean Cain in Lois & Clark was even better.

    5. Re:Brandon Routh? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 0

      I mean how many supermen can we have? Not that anyone can top Christopher Reeve, may he rest in peace.


      He might be a classic old style superman but dean cain is the real superman to most people

      The iPod Lite Project taking orders soon.

    6. Re:Brandon Routh? by DraconPern · · Score: 1

      Ditto that!

    7. Re:Brandon Routh? by (SM)+Spacemonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Brian Singer has said all along he wanted an "unknown" to play Superman. Rumor is Kevin Spacey will be the bad guy.

    8. Re:Brandon Routh? by Flibz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people under the age of 25 you mean surely ? For us old folks on the other hand...

    9. Re:Brandon Routh? by will_die · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with getting the kid from smallville is that the movie would be seen as being based on that version. So it would be a matter the same story line, but in the future, or risk upsetting the viewers.

    10. Re:Brandon Routh? by TheViciousOverWind · · Score: 4, Funny

      He was a good Superman, but Dean Cain in Lois & Clark was even better.

      That comment, really must be a good example that drinking and posting isn't a good mix.

      --
      My <1000 UID is with a hot chick
    11. Re:Brandon Routh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comma, really..

      oh, nevermind.

    12. Re:Brandon Routh? by sgant · · Score: 1, Funny

      yeah, to most people....because most people are young and most people agree that if it's older than 10 years then it doesn't exist anymore.

      Yep..

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    13. Re:Brandon Routh? by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1, Funny


      *** POOF ***

      damn, where did I go????

    14. Re:Brandon Routh? by danger_boy_13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They approached the actor from Smallville, but he didn't want to do it.

    15. Re:Brandon Routh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the guy from Smallville. That makes a lot of fucking sense when you consider that this Superman movie takes place after the events of Superman II (it ignores III and IV). So what, did Superman spin the Earth backwards so that he could get 10 years younger? Dumbass.

    16. Re:Brandon Routh? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Either I'm just getting old, or I've missed something important. Reeve has always been the "real" Superman to me, and I remember the movies with fondness.

      I'm not that old, but is it now that I'm supposed to say that "you young folks today don't understand how things were back then"? :)

      But anyway, how can you claim that Cain is the "real Superman to most people"? I never saw the series as anything but a lame spinoff. The original movies were better in style, more suited to my tastes. The series is too bright and happy and... well, light. It just doesn't seem right, and Cain doesn't feel like the real thing to me.

      Am I getting old or what? :)

      By the way, why are you adding that... "spam" line to your posts automatically?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    17. Re:Brandon Routh? by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dean Cain was a better Clark Kent, but Reeve will never be topped as Superman. He pretty much defined the role himself.

      The only thing is that always strikes me is that Superman is a small-town Kansas boy - so why doesn't he sound like a bumpkin? The actors that play him always sound like East Coast (or LA) city folks.

    18. Re:Brandon Routh? by a3217055 · · Score: 1

      Ok Brandon Routh, a bit too young. And also not goofy enough as clark kent. Christopher Reeves really played one of the best Clark Kents that have apperared. Hope that disaster like Smallville doesn'turn up and have their cast memebers flying. No Smallville is a disgrace to Clark Kent Smallville makes Clark Kent look like a farming Playboy.Anyway they should make a Superman Vs. Batman. Or maybe X-Men with Spiderman and the Hulk doing a cameo. Or maybe Batman Vs. Predator with Aliens... Now that is cool. Or even make an Iron Man or a War Machine movie.... but no ... you have to do Superman. But Brandon Routh please they just as well should have a Hindi Movie song and dance sequnce in this movie. These "dramatic" movies are too much for me if I want to watch a dramatic movie I would watch Pather Panchali by Satyajit Ray.

    19. Re:Brandon Routh? by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you recently been to Kansas? They talk like normal people. Maybe with more of a midwestern "Bob Dole doesn't take no guff" twang.

      As far as the east coast, there's more dialects there than I can think of: bahstonn, lon guyland, new joisey, philly, bal'mer. And don't even get me started with the deep south...

      --
      My father is a blogger.
    20. Re:Brandon Routh? by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Informative

      To the _real_ old folks (like me), it's not Christopher Reeve, it's my man George.

      Now that guy was Superman! He was an excellently wooden Clark, a sufficiently boy-scout Supes. Not too powerful but still the man.

      Oh, and the 1950s series had the best Jimmy Olson and Chief as well. I'll give you Terri Hatcher as Lois Lane though, although I like the 40s Cartoon Lois better.

      --
      My father is a blogger.
    21. Re:Brandon Routh? by rednip · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which TV series are you talking about? The Adventures of Superman stared George Reeves (how's that for old) long before Christopher Reeve had the role. I am just old enough to remember a time before the last 'crop' of Superman movies (look up Superman on IMDB, hell, I didn't know there were so many titles), when the old 50's show was in heavy syndication. I saw the Lois and Clark (and for that matter smallville) as fair and worthy tellings of the Superman story. George Reeve was my 'first superman', I quess that since he was long dead by the time I saw the show, I am more open to other 'flavors' of the story.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    22. Re:Brandon Routh? by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

      Brandon Routh

      Acting Appearances

      Starring Roles
      Undressed (1999) - Wade (Season 3)
      One Life to Live (1968) - Seth Anderson (#1) (05/23/2001-04/17/2002)

      Guest Starring Roles

      Will & Grace - Sebastian - A Gay/December Romance (2004)
      Cold Case - Henry Phillips ('64 - A Time to Hate (2003)
      Gilmore Girls - Jess [as B.J. Routh] - Concert Interruptus (2001)
      Odd Man Out - Connor [as B.J. Routh] - You've Got Female (1999)

      Co Starring Roles

      Oliver Beene - Brian - Dibs (2004)

      Movie/Mini-Series/Special Roles

      Deadly -

    23. Re:Brandon Routh? by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, that's what I meant - just a bit of the Bob Dole twang is missing. Besides, even here in Ontario, the farm boys don't sound like the city slickers. Superman is a farm boy, and doesn't sound like one.

    24. Re:Brandon Routh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In the first movie he went north to his fortress of solitude for several years. He can easily have refined his speach to match that of most national news broadcasters. They generally have very little twang or work most of it out after a few years.

    25. Re:Brandon Routh? by tabrnaker · · Score: 0

      how is it informative to cut and paste info from the brandon routh link on the front page??? Moderators might want to read the links and mark redundant

    26. Re:Brandon Routh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, amazingly difficult to get info on this guy... official website is down, no photo on imdb... I guess that'll all change soon...

      My only concern is that Jess (as he is known in Gilmore Girls) doesn't seem very tall... Like.. under 6 feet? I always envisioned Superman as being at least 6 feet tall...

      Anyhow, here's a ton of pics from an obvious source... (you just have to use the right keywords)

      Google Image Search

    27. Re:Brandon Routh? by cshark · · Score: 1

      I still say we should stick with tradition and let Kiyanu do it.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    28. Re:Brandon Routh? by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      Actually the pasted material was not from the article page, it was from another movie/actor information site that I prefer which tends to bother to insert pictures, etc.

    29. Re:Brandon Routh? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      "Dean Cain was a better Clark Kent, but Reeve will never be topped as Superman."

      I disagree... I think one of the most brilliant thing about Reeve's performance was the difference between how he played Clark Kent and how he played Superman. I mean, you really could have put them beside each other and convinced me they were different actors.

      The scene in Lois's apartment right after Superman left and Clark showed up and Lois is wandering around the apartment stunned, and Clark takes off his glasses, stands up straight, and says "Lois, there's something I have to tell you," illustrates this perfectly. There's such a difference between timid, bumbling Clark Kent and majestic (for lack of a better word) Superman.

    30. Re:Brandon Routh? by TrickFred · · Score: 1

      Okay, I realize I'm probably gonna be crucified for admitting this - but I watch Gilmore Girls [because the wife does, honest], and to prevent confusion, there are 2 guys named 'Jess' - one was a bit part 'Jess' from a first season episode [our new Superman, Brandon Routh] who had like 30 seconds of total screen time and was never seen again. The recurring character that showed up in second season, 'Jess', the short, scrawny kid [Milo Ventimiglia], is not the guy who will be playing the new Superman. I just checked the Gilmore Girls Season 1 DVDs.

    31. Re:Brandon Routh? by Sailor+Coruscant · · Score: 1

      According to Lois and Clark canon, at least, Clark travelled the world for several years before coming to Metropolis. That could have something to do with the softening of his accent.

    32. Re:Brandon Routh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't need to be topped as Superman, he's been topped, period. Mwahahahahaha.

    33. Re:Brandon Routh? by blushadow · · Score: 0

      Dean Caine?! LMAO the guy is a horrible actor and doing direct to video crap now.

  2. dude by molywi · · Score: 1, Funny

    from gilmore girls to superman? hope he has not lost his testicles yet...........

    1. Re:dude by ScubaGrrl · · Score: 1

      Considering how bulging testicles look in spandex, it's just as well he has.

  3. Bad taste by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not that they are making another Superman series, but that they are doing this with the full knowledge of the Superman curse.

    I don't know who this latest guy is, he doesn't even warrant a picture in IMDB, but we'll soon be seeing him hiding in some bushes or thrown from a moving train or some other strange and inexplicable circumstance.

    On top of that, the real Superman, Clark W. Kent, died in the comic books years ago. So did Bruce Wayne, the original Batman. Can't we just let these heroes among us pass in peace? Do we have to drag their dead carcasses out of the grave to squeeze just one more penny out of the franchise?

    1. Re:Bad taste by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of coincidence?

    2. Re:Bad taste by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1
      On top of that, the real Superman, Clark W. Kent, died in the comic books years ago. So did Bruce Wayne, the original Batman.

      Do you mean dead as in Captain America style (the mantle passes on), or dead as in he-died-but-then-he-came-back-what-a-shock?

    3. Re:Bad taste by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      Not that they are making another Superman series, but that they are doing this with the full knowledge of the Superman curse.

      Curse be damned:
      Teri Hatcher
      Kristin Kreuk
      Allison Mack

    4. Re:Bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you heard of the curse of Steamboat Willie? Every single person associated with the production is DEAD!

    5. Re:Bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or frozen!!!

    6. Re:Bad taste by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 1
      Can't we just let these heroes among us pass in peace? Do we have to drag their dead carcasses out of the grave to squeeze just one more penny out of the franchise?

      Of course! Man you want too much, you'll be asking for good/original movies from hollywood next!

    7. Re:Bad taste by Surak_Prime · · Score: 1

      The Golden Age Superman never died - he, the GA Lois Lane, and Superboy from Earth Prime stepped into an eternal paradise world that existed, it seemed to me, inside Alexander Luthor. See "Crisis On Infinite Earths" comic miniseries or the collected graphic novel.

      --
      :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
    8. Re:Bad taste by black+mariah · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Do we have to drag their dead carcasses out of the grave to squeeze just one more penny out of the franchise?
      They're fictional characters created to SELL SHIT. What the fuck do you think?
      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    9. Re:Bad taste by Lisandro · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course, it was just a publicity stunt; the guy died in the comic allright, complete with special editions and stuff, but killing Superman would be just like killing Daffy Duck. You can't make a comicbook character die and dissapear, even less one like Superman.

      IIRC, the Superman comics actually continued, but with a different storyline; something like "Son of Superman". Check this link:

      "Naturally, this would not be the end of the Man of Steel; after a number of stories in which Superman's friends and family deal with their feelings, it's discovered that his body is missing from his mausoleum, driving speculation that he might still be alive. Adding to the mystery are four new characters who each claim to be a new incarnation of Superman: a young, cocky kid with Superman's powers; a steel-suited African-American construction worker; a cold and vengeful hero who had taken over Superman's Fortress of Solitude; and a cyborg who half-resembled Superman and half-resembled the robots from the Terminator movies. After months of stories in which all four new Supermen worked and fought with each other, the one true Superman returns to claim his rightful place in the DC pantheon."

      Anyway, i bought the comic when it came out. It worked on me, the bastards :)

    10. Re:Bad taste by TwistedSquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I presumed that's what the original poster was referring to, Superboy/Steel/Eradicator (I think)/Cyborg, but they made it sound as if Wayne/Kent had gone for good, which was puzzling me... Although I don't remember Wayne dying, though his back did get broken by Bane and he got replaced for a bit... ah the joys of Marvel/DC continuities!

    11. Re:Bad taste by KDan · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nothing compared to the pyramids of egypt. Tens of thousands of people worked on those, and all of them died, and we don't even know the circumstances of their deaths!!

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    12. Re:Bad taste by servognome · · Score: 4, Funny

      a steel-suited African-American construction worker
      How the hell did he try to pass himself off as superman?
      "Yeah I'm Superman, I was just in the Carribean getting a tan"

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    13. Re:Bad taste by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      That explains why they don't want to use the guy from Smalleville...they actually like him and don't want him to suffer the curse.
      They should really use the guy from Smalleville... a much better choice - even though he is younger looking then the mild mannered report who looked around late 20's early 30's in the Superman series.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    14. Re:Bad taste by micromoog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to mention the bad taste of announcing this just after Christopher Reeves' death, to ride on the free publicity.

    15. Re:Bad taste by Moonlapse · · Score: 1

      Kent didn't die in that story. Supergirl morphed into Superman and 'rescued' Kent from some rubble after everything was said and done.

      --
      - I got my free iPod and a free Nintendo DS....why not
    16. Re:Bad taste by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Full body-covering armour. Couldn't see his face. Still, he was a massive black guy from Seattle so everyone could tell that he was black inside (he sounded like it). Basically people considered him a "spiritual successor". Then they had Shaq make an awful movie of the character ("STEEL").

      Other replacements from the "reign" of the supermen: a very confused electrokinetic android, a sinister cyborg, and a teenaged "clone" who was actually just a very complicated genetic-engineering program designed to make a *human* that was as similar to superman as possible. Also, a drunken bartender named Bibbo, as comic releif. And eventually, an unpowered gunwielding hero who just happened to be the real thing, slowly recovering from his "death".

      IIRC, the story resulted in the annihilation of Coast City, which is what eventually caused the Green Lantern to go insane and wipe out the entire Green Lantern army.

    17. Re:Bad taste by Mant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On top of that, the real Superman, Clark W. Kent, died in the comic books years ago. So did Bruce Wayne, the original Batman.

      Comic book characters die, and come back to life, all the time. Spuerman was dead for a bit, but came back soon after. I'm not aware of Bruce Wayne ever dieing in main continuity.

      Of course, they get killed is some non-continuity Elseworlds stuff. Plus back when DC had parralel univerese (they all got merged in Crisis on Infiniate Earth) Bruce Wayne died in Earth-2, but not the 'main' Earth.

      Characters like Superman and Batman are pretty archetypal. Subsequent generation re-invent them to suit the times, that is what happens with mythlogy, it keeps it alive and relevant, and IMO is much better than just leaving them alone.

    18. Re:Bad taste by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1
      the real Superman, Clark W. Kent, died in the comic books years ago. So did Bruce Wayne, the original Batman.

      Actually, the Superman comics quickly brought him back to life. They're tricky that way.

      Also, Bruce Wayne did not die -- his back was broken and he became a permanent cripple. However, the fan reaction was so negative that they then realized that Bruce Wayne knew some mystic healer person and that his crippling wasn't permanent after all... so both Batman and Superman are back to "normal".

      --

      I am the man with no sig!

    19. Re:Bad taste by Scutter · · Score: 4, Funny

      killing Superman would be just like killing Daffy Duck.

      You can't kill Daffy Duck. All you can do is blow his feathers off with dynamite or make his beak spin around with a shotgun blast or something.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    20. Re:Bad taste by operagost · · Score: 1

      Then he calls you despicable, and spits all over your shirt.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:Bad taste by craw · · Score: 1

      There is *no* curse! It died last night.

      Who's your daddy?

    22. Re:Bad taste by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Clark W. Kent was NOT the real Superman.
      The real Superman was Clark W. Kent.

      Clark W. Kent cannot die or be killed off as he does not, did not, and never will exist. Clark Kent was Superman's _costume_.

      --
      No Comment.
    23. Re:Bad taste by doublem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're thinking of Bruce Wayne / Batman. Batman has stated a number of times that Bruce Wayne is an identity he can discard if the need arises.

      With ole Superman, it's more complicated. Both identities are "him" but not the "full" him. For example, superman has to keep his ties to the Kents and The Daily Planet staff secret, while Clark has to keep his powers secret.

      Oh God, I'm comic book geeking again.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    24. Re:Bad taste by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      You're missing my point, these are all about deceptions they have to carry on in their lives to conceal things about their true identities.

      Batman does not exist, Batman is a character that Bruce Wayne employs.

      Superman however does indeed exist, and it is Clark Kent that is the fictional character that Superman employs.

      --
      No Comment.
    25. Re:Bad taste by glorf · · Score: 1

      I remember when the whole "Death of Superman" comic came out. There was a huge uproar, but amidst all that some comic historian put things in perspective a little by revealing that Superman had died in the comic at least 50 times before. It had just been so long since they had done it that most people were not aware. So no, you can't just make them disappear, but it seems you can kill them as many times as you want.

    26. Re:Bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it's because he can't act.

    27. Re:Bad taste by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      You're listening to too much Tarantino. While it sounds neat that Superman is the only guy whose "fake" identity is the "mere mortal", its just not true.

      Bruce Wayne is the birth name of the character Batman, but Bruce Wayne doesn't exist and hasn't existed for that man since he was a child. Every moment he spends in regular clothes being a normal joe is an act -- he is Batman 24/7, and was even before he had renamed himself.

      If you want to do it strictly by metrics (for all the managers out there), Clark Kent exists on a daily basis -- he goes to work, lives a life, and only acts as Superman when necessary. Bruce Wayne exists only for short periods when it is necessary to put on a show. When he wakes up in the morning, when he goes to bed at night, he's Batman, thinking about whatever case or Batman issue is at hand. He spends his free time in the Batcave, not in Stately Wayne Manor.

      I'm going to go kill myself now :)

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    28. Re:Bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops - I meant DC, not Seattle. Thought "washington" and got myself confused.

    29. Re:Bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell did he try to pass himself off as superman?

      He never claimed to be Superman, but said he was wearing the "big S" as a tribute to the (presumed) dead Superman. However, Steel didn't give press conferences, so some of the media speculated that he might be Superman.

    30. Re:Bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Clark W. Kent cannot die or be killed off as he does not, did not, and never will exist. Clark Kent was Superman's _costume_.

      Not after retcon (retroactive continuity). The character thinks of himself as being primarily Clark Kent from Smallville and Metropolis, his birth identity as Kal-El, and Superman is an identity he creates to protect his daily existence as Clark Kent. In other words, Superman is the fiction, Clark Kent is the reality.

    31. Re:Bad taste by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Bruce Wayne, AKA Batman, either way, is just a human being. He wasn't born anything other than that.

      Superman was born Superman.

      Everything else is semantic.

      --
      No Comment.
    32. Re:Bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Christopher Reeve's"

      Note: His name was Reeve, not Reeves, so the apostrophe should go before the 's'.

    33. Re:Bad taste by codeguy007 · · Score: 1

      It did. Tell that to bill buckner that. I think they need to win 4 more games.

    34. Re:Bad taste by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      You realizthe, of coursth, thisth meansth war.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    35. Re:Bad taste by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Kal-El was born an average kid to a gifted scientist. Bruce Wayne was born an average kid to a wealthy doctor.

      Both of them had things happen to change what would otherwise have been ordinary lives (and short comic series!).

      I hardly think its a matter of semantics to say that personal identity has something to do with how we act over the course of our lifetime, day after day, and how we perceive ourselves.

      That was, in fact, the entire point of what Bill was saying in the movie -- that he liked Superman BECAUSE he sympathized with him having to PRETEND to be a human being, walking around making coffee and going to work, when he was so much more. Her marriage couldn't have worked because she would have always felt dissatisfied, out of place, a fraud.

      But he (Bill/Tarantino) is wrong because while Clark Kent is PHYSICALLY more than human, his identity has NEVER been that of a Kryptonian playing dress-up and holding himslef back. He's not pretending to be Clark Kent -- that IS his identity and has been since he was a baby. He's a kid from the farm who moved to the big city and -- by the way -- can leap buildings in a single bound, so he feels a responsibility to help people. He puts on the Superman suit for the same reason every other character does, to protect his day-to-day life from those who would seek to hurt him through it.

      It's not like he wore a cape every day until he decided to work at the Daily Planet for kicks. He didn't get married to Lois and get a job and apartment because he's bored with a lack of heavy objects to lift and people to rescue. He does those things because they are his life -- his real life. When he's out helping people, he doesn't begrudge them, but he wants to go back home to reading the paper with Lois as soon as he can.

      Batman/Bruce Wayne has none of those things. He doesn't have a "normal" life except for the completely fictional character of a wealthy playboy he uses for convenience to fool other people. He's playing dress-up when he puts on a tux and goes to a party. He's playing dress-up when he goes to a board meeting.

      All he's thinking when he's interacting with people as Bruce Wayne is "how little can I do here, how few people can I speak to, before I can go back to the cave and do some work?"

      He DOES feel constrained by Bruce Wayne, he DOES feel imposed upon by the time he has to spend attending to that character.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    36. Re:Bad taste by MrBruceLee · · Score: 0

      Wow the stuff you just wrote goes way of the scale on the geek-o-meter. But for some reason it arouses me ... a lot

  4. superman... batman... by mirko · · Score: 1

    Is it really necessary to keep with those.
    I am not sure I want to see Superman again.
    Concerning Batman, I also thought so but at least, they could convince me to go to the theater if it was made after the Dark Knight story (which sequel is also VERY impressive).

    So, well, could someone indicate me a PERFECT Superman story that'd made me change my mind about this caricatural hero (IMHO) ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:superman... batman... by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1
      Concerning Batman, I also thought so but at least, they could convince me to go to the theater if it was made after the Dark Knight story (which sequel is also VERY impressive)

      Ah, but the story is effectively based on Batman: Year One, which was also by Frank Miller, and considered by some (Jeph Loeb is one I believe) to be better than Dark Knight Returns. I prefer Dark Knight Returns but Year One probably makes for a better blockbuster action film.

    2. Re:superman... batman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it was made after the Dark Knight story (which sequel is also VERY impressive).

      _whose_ sequel is also VERY impressive.

      Cheers :)

    3. Re:superman... batman... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Well, they could do any of the following:
      - Superman vs. Doomsday
      - Superman vs. The Eradicator (ie, "post death" so Superman wouldn't be at full strength")
      - Superman vs. Bizzaro

      Whatever the plot, it should weigh his struggle with being half human and half superman (metaphrically speaking), with the pinnings of responsibility in both worlds. Maybe make him lose his powers. Maybe make him have a conflict that comes down to revealing who he really is.

      Granted, those were all done in the original trilogy, but they could be done again. Just hope the actor doesn't suck and is up to the task of rivaling Reeve's ability with Superman/Clark Kent.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  5. Exploitation or poor timing? by joelethan · · Score: 1
    You'll believe a script can fly!

    /joelethan

  6. Let's not be hypocrites by codazzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's obvious they're just exploiting the momentum raised by Reeve's death to make it look like a "due tribute" or something. This is hollywood at its best.

    1. Re:Let's not be hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rubbish. The Superman project has been in development hell for something like 5 or 6 years now: it has gone through several incarnations and several directors. Nicholas Cage was rumoured to be in line to play the Big Blue Boy Scout, Wolfgang Petersen was going to direct Batman v Superman but dropped out to helm Troy instead, Brett Ratner was then attached to Superman for a long while (the Batman element was dropped when Chris "Memento" Nolan signed up to helm Batman Begins), Kevin "Clerks" Smith wrote a script which got ditched, then McG was mooted to take over after Ratner got dropped, before Singer signed up a couple of months ago. Not necessarily in this order. All this happened *before* Christopher Reeve's death.

    2. Re:Let's not be hypocrites by narcolepticjim · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm very, very grateful that this film won't involve the services of McG. I saw the second Charlie's Angels film, which appeared to be the end product of a cinematic laxative. Afterward I had a good cry and kicked my dog.

      If McG had ended up with the film, I probably would taken violent steps to Helen Kellerize myself, ensuring I'd never see Superman ruined.

    3. Re:Let's not be hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kevin "Clerks" Smith wrote a script which got ditched

      If anyone is interested in reading the Kevin Smith script, it's here and here is a picture of Brandon Routh who will be playing superman in the 2006 movie.

    4. Re:Let's not be hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got any facts to back that up?

      i didn't think so.

      twit.

  7. Re:crude humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Q. Whats the difference between Christopher Reeve and someone who tells a Christopher Reeve joke?

    A: Christopher Reeve still had some feeling left

  8. Brandon Routh Bio by sofakingon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Somehow I don't think this guy can do it:

    Birthday: October 9, 1979
    Birth Place: Des Moines, IA, USA
    Birth Name: Brandon James Routh

    Also credited as:
    B.J. Routh
    Brandon 'B.J.' Routh

    View Biography

    Notes

    Born in Des Moines, Iowa and grew up in nearby Norwalk.
    Attended the University of Iowa, and starred in many productions at the Norwalk Theater of Performing Arts.
    Appeared in Christina Aguilera's "What A Girl Wants" video.
    Enjoys playing basketball, biking, soccer and swimming.
    His sister Sara is a singer/songwriter and a radio D.J.

    News

    October 17, 2004
    Has Bryan Singer Found His Superman?
    Brandon Routh is The Man Of Steel. We think. Probably.
    More Info

    Crew Credits

    Acting Appearances

    Starring Roles
    Undressed (1999) - Wade (Season 3)
    One Life to Live (1968) - Seth Anderson (#1) (05/23/2001-04/17/2002)

    Guest Starring Roles

    Will & Grace - Sebastian - A Gay/December Romance (2004)
    Cold Case - Henry Phillips ('64 - A Time to Hate (2003)
    Gilmore Girls - Jess [as B.J. Routh] - Concert Interruptus (2001)
    Odd Man Out - Connor [as B.J. Routh] - You've Got Female (1999)

    Co Starring Roles

    Oliver Beene - Brian - Dibs (2004)

    Movie/Mini-Series/Special Roles

    Deadly -

    Quick rundown:

    His name is "BJ"
    He was a regular on a soap opera
    He was a gay guy on "Will and Grace"
    He was a dancer in a Christina Aguilera video

    How do you go from the above to Superman?
    Someone please tell me cuz I've got a lot more under my belt than he does. I wanna be superman too!!!!

    1. Re: Brandon Routh Bio by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1, Funny
      His name is "BJ"
      He was a regular on a soap opera
      He was a gay guy on "Will and Grace"
      He was a dancer in a Christina Aguilera video

      How do you go from the above to Superman?
      I think Johnny Cash explained it in "A Boy Named Sue".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1
      His name is "BJ"
      He was a regular on a soap opera
      He was a gay guy on "Will and Grace"
      He was a dancer in a Christina Aguilera video

      How do you go from the above to Superman?


      You must have been living in a box for the last 20 years so I will take pity on you and explain. The Superman of the 21'st century is metrosexual you insensitive clod!.
      metrosexual Function: noun Definition: a young, urban and usually heterosexual male who is concerned with fashion, food and grooming Etymology: Coined by Mark Simpson in 1994 article for The Independent
      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you go from the above to Superman?
      Someone please tell me cuz I've got a lot more under my belt than he does. I wanna be superman too!!!!


      He's an actor. That's what they do. I'm not too concerned about it.

    4. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      "The Superman of the 21'st century is metrosexual you insensitive clod!."

      So help me, I think I just felt the Duke, Sinatra, and Clint Eastwood (this is how rumors get started) crawling out of their graves to kick your @ss for saying that. Good fricken grief!

      WTF is the big deal with this "metrosexual" cr@p? Seriously; other than "Will & Grace" being on TV nothing has changed. Men have ALWAYS been concerned with how they looked, because women always were. Different segments of society just have different ideas of attractiveness. Some consider blue jeans and a T-shirt attractive, others find men with WAY to much time on their hands attractive (ex: "The English Gentleman", Fop, excreta)

      "metrosexual Function: noun Definition: a young, urban and usually heterosexual male who is concerned with fashion, food and grooming Etymology: Coined by Mark Simpson in 1994 article for The Independent "

      Fashion: addressed above. This is subjective. The fact that men are inclined to dress more femininely is culturally transient, and irrelevant to phrases such as "21'st century".

      Food: Male is the traditional gender for Chef's. Julia Childs (RIP/ztzal) aside almost every major cook in HISTORY has been a man. No offence to my sisters out there, but men are just generally more preoccupied by food.

      Grooming: see the Fonz for reference. Warning: I can not be held responsible for what I might do to you if you refer to Alfredo Fonzerely as metrosexual.

      I should be careful to note here, that I am not passing judgment on anyone. Not for their mode of dress, and certainly not for how they choose to live their lives. This is strictly meant as pop social commentary, and my personal belief that anyone who applies this label to himself, or others, is just rather fond of labels and trends. (me I'm just fond of run on sentences)

    5. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by karnal · · Score: 1

      excreta)

      Whoa, boy... Slow down there!

      --
      Karnal
    6. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by sokoban · · Score: 1

      >How do you go from the above to Superman?

      He's super, thanks for asking.

      Like. Duh.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    7. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you're getting old when the next Superman is only 20 days older than yourself.

      http://www.factcheck.org
      http://www.blackboxvot ing.com

    8. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by hashwolf · · Score: 1

      If you stop and think about it...

      This this guy must interpret a role where he is suposed to wear red underwear OVER blue spandex tights.
      In addition, imagine yourself in this situation: You've got 'lot of stuff under your belt', you're wearing the friggin costume and you're in a scene with the type of girl that is usually choosen to do Lois Lane's part... [Is that an oscar or you're just happy to see me?]

      Let me tell you, the guy is just perfect for the part!

      --
      - "They misunderestimated me."
    9. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by marcop · · Score: 1

      This guy is neither tall nor muscular. Previous Supermen were one of these two. This guy doesn't look like "the man of steel".

    10. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I don't know, in my experience, "fashion" and "grooming" involves effort and time. There's a homophobic and male-superior trait in hetrosexual male culture which says that if you spend time "grooming", you're abnormal.

      It goes something like this: If you spend too much time on your hair, you might be gay, which means you like men, like a woman, which means you're womanly, which means you're inferior and probably posess all kinds of inferior female traits.

      Most men do not stygmatize people on this, but they're subconciously aware of what would provoke those who do stygmatize. Just try to wear spandex or a pink shirt... why is it hard? Why do you get funny looks? Why don't you have pink in your wardrobe?

      So, many men are afraid to be seen to take an inordinately large amount of effort in personal grooming. "inordinately" is relative based on what you do in your life. A bricklayer who shows up to work daily with well-polished shoes (even before changing out of them) would probably get his coworkers talking... whereas a business man regularly getting his shoes polished on his lunch break would not.

      So a cheap, short haircut, jeans and a T-shirt is generally not fashion, it's conforming. There are social pressures on men not to deviate... I think too this is why we have the 3-peice suit, the tuxedo and the business casual formula. Do not deviate!

      The opposite is true too... although not being a woman, I can't say how much women strive to appear womanly, and how much they'd be ostracized for going around everywhere with a cheap, efficient hair cut, jeans and a t-shirt.

    11. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will admit you've got a point.

      But, when I heard that Tobey Maguire was going to be spiderman, i wasn't really impressed either. He proved me wrong.

    12. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by toganet · · Score: 1

      Since when is 6'2" not tall?

    13. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Most men do not stygmatize people on this, but they're subconciously aware of what would provoke those who do stygmatize.

      I had no idea I was such a subconsious bigot!

      why is it hard?

      Me. In spandex? Yes. I'm not even sure how to put it on. Do you have to heat it up first?

      Why do you get funny looks?

      Pink spandex? Most women would get funny looks. I would positivly bring down the house with laughter.

      Why don't you have pink in your wardrobe?

      Because blue is my color. It brings out my eyes. That and my color blind mother spent most of my childhood trying to get me to wear pink. Why do we let her shop? 11 years after highschool and I'm still a nerd 'cause of that woman. Ho hum.. It pays well at least.

      whereas a business man regularly getting his shoes polished on his lunch break would not.

      Yes, but if he shows up in your pink spandex all bets are off. Same goes for makeup, tweasing, or any other personal grooming habit that may border on vanity.

      Ahh.. there it is. The kernel of the issue is vanity, and that it is not expected of men. That diferentiation may be a tad archaic. Since it used to be a womans job, such to attract a man. In theory we are beyond the point where a woman seeks a husband as a provider, and his earning potential is more important than his grooming (she fixes that anyway). In practice it just isn't usually the case.

      So a cheap, short haircut, jeans and a T-shirt is generally not fashion, it's conforming. There are social pressures on men not to deviate...

      Women in the workforce tend to have shorter fingernails and shorter haircuts. Their cloths are often designed for pragmitisim or to intimidate, not attract (obvious exceptions exempted). And this is all considering the fact that most young women are still raised with beuty raised to a primary virtue! Never the less they still take on a more pragmatic apearance.

      The opposite is true too... I can't say how much women strive to appear womanly, and how much they'd be ostracized for going around everywhere with a cheap, efficient hair cut, jeans and a t-shirt.

      That's probably because men (97%-90% of the time) find WOMEN attractive. And that includes all of the normative social signals that we have been conditioned to think of as womanly. By the same token men try to apear manly, such as to attract women. The fact that it's easier to look manly (thanx to testasterone, and a derth of mens fasion magazines) than womanly is NOT MY FAULT! I didn't make up the rules, I just play by them.

      Your probably right that most men are boring dressers. And that we are over proud of ourselves for simply matching shoes and belts (FYI that's one of the 'rules'). But there is a HUGE difference between concern for ones appearance and vanity.

    14. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by tabrnaker · · Score: 0

      so humility be damn, and lets corrupt more people with vanity, one of the seven deadly sins? Ever wonder why you spend so much time putting on a show? What's more important the book cover or what's inside the book? Would you even know if you spend so much time admiring, cleaning, and polishing the exterior? In western society, if you're not down with the seven deadly sins then you're seen as a freek. I think you need to possess at least 3-4 to be seen as normal. Gluttony. greed, and vanity seem to be the big three now a days, sloth is always up there though, but you can be cool without it.

    15. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by sstidman · · Score: 1

      How do you go from the above to Superman? Someone please tell me cuz I've got a lot more under my belt than he does. I wanna be superman too!!!!

      How much you have under your belt would only matter if this were a porn movie ;-)

      --
      Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
    16. Re:Brandon Routh Bio by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I never said "pink spandex", and I didn't say everyone was a bigot, just that most people are aware of the tolerated vocal bigots in western male culture. Oh well.

      ...By the same token men try to apear manly, such as to attract women. The fact that it's easier to look manly (thanx to testasterone, and a derth of mens fasion magazines) than womanly is NOT MY FAULT! I didn't make up the rules, I just play by them.

      Think about what you're saying!

      "Easier to look manly?" Whether it is true or not, you're not talking about a biological "manliness", you're talking about a sociological one. A man is a man, whether he's reading a men's fashion magazine or not! For that matter, he could be as gay as a fairy, head-to-toe in rainbows and pastels, and he's still a man, never to be mistaken for a woman (transvestites excepted)

      I also don't think you're talking about "easier", I think you're saying that spending time on your appearance is not seen as a "manly" thing to do.

      Most women don't care if you fit a guy's definition of "manly", they want you to fit their definition of "manly". A woman's definition of manly generally does not include a fear of being seen to spend time on your appearance.

      ...but aside from a few purple t-shirts and a very sparing use of bicycle shorts while cycling, I too conform to the dull drab of jeans and a t-shirt or business casual attire.

  9. Picture of Brandon Routh by CheesyPeteza · · Score: 5, Informative

    Heres a picture of Brandon and a write up of him at Latino Review: http://www.latinoreview.com/scoops/brandon-superma n.html

    1. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by Quobobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is anyone else somewhat creeped out by that website? I'd find it equally weird if there was a "Caucasian Review" or something similar, entertainment reviews based on race are just pretty strange.

    2. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by lavar78 · · Score: 1
      There isn't a "Caucasian Review" because Caucasians are the only group that doesn't have to worry at all about lack of representation in the entertainment field.

      http://www.latinoreview.com/aboutus/aboutus.html

      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    3. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      I read that, and I still think it's a dumb site. They want to see their own race represented more as equals, yet they use lines like "help the Latino community bind together". I can understand doing things like that based on language, but race? Pretty screwy IMHO.

    4. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by lavar78 · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, I think it flew right over your head. The full line says, "It is our goal to help the Latino community bind together and let our voices be spread." IOW, coming together will give them a stronger voice so they can argue for equality. That's a formula that's been used throughout history for many civil-rights issues.

      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    5. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by SengirV · · Score: 1

      And it has produced a civil society all right. It's more divisive than ever with forced fragmentation by only dealing with your own race. The US was built as a melting pot for a reason. Things like this spit in the face of that notion.

      --

      Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    6. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by lavar78 · · Score: 1
      "More divisive than ever"? It's still nowhere near perfect, but I can't agree with that. You must be joking about the "melting pot" thing. This country has never been a true melting pot; if anything, it's more like a salad that hasn't been mixed very well.

      Furthermore, melting pot probably isn't a realistic (or even desirable) goal. A properly mixed salad would be ideal IMO.

      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    7. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reminded of the Asian Job Fair that was at my university. No, it wasn't a fair for jobs in Asia, it was a job fair for Asians only.

    8. Re:Picture of Brandon Routh by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Maybe the idea is to get people to think of Latinos a group of people that share an ethnic heritage, instead of being some strange, exotic "race." Keep in mind that Italians and Irish were thought of as separate races at the turn of the last century.

  10. Re:crude humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sick bastard!
    Um... you wanna make out?

    .................... but, I don't have tits, you insensative clod!

  11. It's going to be great. by ideatrack · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hear it has a giant spider in it, which Superman fights. They're the fiercest fighters.

    It's going to rule!

    1. Re:It's going to be great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and Superman is not going to have a cape or fly, 'cause that'd be too gay.

    2. Re:It's going to be great. by josiebauer · · Score: 1

      Yeah - and he's not going to fly, and he's not going to wear the superman suit ;) This is going to be the best Superman ever!

    3. Re:It's going to be great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he can have a fight with polar bears at the fortress of solitude?

    4. Re:It's going to be great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear there is going to be a scene with Braniac razzlin some polar bears

  12. Uncouth by JerSully · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of the replies to this article are amoungst the most tasteless and uninformed that I've seen on Slashdot. Come on guys, take 10 seconds to research the new actor and refrain from saying mean things about Mr. Reeve for now. But... yeah... Gilmore Girls... Until I looked him up I was confuzled.

    1. Re:Uncouth by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I tried to look him up, but his official site (found from imdb) was down. That makes it entirely too much work.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Brian Singer is da man. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, considering the director's deft handling of the X-Man series, this is welcome news indeed. Singer is a workaholic super-nerd who prepped himself for the X-Men movies by reading every issue of the "Uncanny X-Men" comics and then watching every episode of the old Fox cartoon series. Of course, it is debateable whether or not reading comics and watching cartoons is work, but making a good movie most definitely is, and Mr. Singer knows his shit.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    1. Re:Brian Singer is da man. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Slight problem here, though.

      If the upcoming Superman film is anything like the X-Men film, It Will Suck. Here's why:

      The X-men films were modeled after the comics, and from what I could see, the cartoon series that was on television. The actual X-Men comics don't tend to be too big on drama from what I recall (while comics like Wolverine and the other individual hero comics do). Superman, on the other hand, has always been about the drama and social situations, from what I recall. Reeves did an incredible job portraying that element in the original Superman movies.

      I just can't see them handling it in such a fashion, however. It'll likely be a glitzy Superman vs. Doomsday, Brainiac or such, and will only give lip service to Superman as anything but the Man of Steel, ignoring the oh-so-important Clark Kent side.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  14. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thats not Brandon, thats (KAMAR REYES) this is Brandon http://www.geocities.com/televisioncity/9779/pubga l/br2.jpg

  15. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Xpilot · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's a better pic at superman-v.com . The pic at that geocities site makes it look like Superman was outsourced to India.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  16. Anybody else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think this is kind of weird timing after Christopher's death?? Kind of like the HHGTTG movie timing. They had to wait for Douglas to die before they could go forward with what production wanted, (ie a money making movie, not a GOOD movie). Anybody else think Mr Reeve maybe had some say that the production didn't like, and now that he's gone it gives them the chance to go forward?? Just my 2 cents.

    1. Re:Anybody else by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Reeve made Superman III and IV. I don't think he was too worried about diminishing the stature of the character.

    2. Re:Anybody else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reeve made Superman III and IV. I don't think he was too worried about diminishing the stature of the character

      That just helps prove my point that Reeve had some say in this new Superman movie and they waited till after his death to go forward.

    3. Re:Anybody else by AndrewStephens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm, wasn't Douglas Adams's death pretty unexpected. I mean, he was only in his fourties and still in good heath right up until the end. I don't think the producers were delibrately holding back the movie just on the wild chance the author might die. In the case of Superman, this movie has been talked about for months, so they are not trying to cash in on Reeve's death. If anything, it will hurt the movie. In any case, what would he say anyway, the Superman IV was years ago (and didn't do so well) so he wouldn't have been cast in the lead role even if he hadn't had his accident.

      --
      sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
    4. Re:Anybody else by Devalia · · Score: 1

      Douglas wrote HHGTTG whereas Reeve's simply acted in the previous superman.

      Quite a difference in weight of anything they say regarding both films or is it just me who thinks that?

    5. Re:Anybody else by _undan · · Score: 1

      If they wanted H2G2 to be a money making movie instead of a good movie, they wouldn't have given it to Hammer and Tongs to do.

    6. Re:Anybody else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's not how film scheduling works.

      If production is only a month away, than pre-production has been going on for quite some time now. Production and delivery dates are already set, and must have been for some time now.

      It's a coincidence that Chris happened to pass away when he did... and as he'd been holding on for such a long time, there's no way a studio would keep a project like this on hold like that. No profit in it.

    7. Re:Anybody else by gosand · · Score: 1
      Think this is kind of weird timing after Christopher's death?? Kind of like the HHGTTG movie timing. They had to wait for Douglas to die before they could go forward with what production wanted, (ie a money making movie, not a GOOD movie). Anybody else think Mr Reeve maybe had some say that the production didn't like, and now that he's gone it gives them the chance to go forward?? Just my 2 cents.

      Honestly, I doubt Reeve would have contributed much. I will admit, I was a fan of the original Superman movie, but I was 9 years old. I would like to see this story told up to today's standards. The X-Men movies rocked. No Batman movie has come close but the first was the best of the lot. Spider-Man 1 and 2 were really good. I didn't see the Hulk, the CGI in the trailers was too corny for my taste. Daredevil got rented only for Jennifer Garner.

      But come on, these are the easy ones! I want them to take on a tough super hero, one that isn't as obviously interesting. Do Aquaman. Do The Green Lantern. The Flash. Hmm, OK maybe not. If they can't get translate the "easy" ones into movies I am sure these would be real stinkers. I am surprised they haven't tried Captain America yet - other than the stinker in 1991. Red Skull and Baron Blood were scary when I was little reading the comics.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    8. Re:Anybody else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the producers were delibrately holding back the movie just on the wild chance the author might die.

      Right, it's not like Adams had been trying to make it a movie since he originally wrote it. Oh wait.

    9. Re:Anybody else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daredevil got rented only for Jennifer Garner.

      Same here... and we're in for a treat next year: Elektra (2005)

    10. Re:Anybody else by jdbo · · Score: 1

      Interesting paranoia, but uninformed.

      The "next Superman movie" has been in development (many tens of millions of dollars worth, at this point, with nary a frame shot) since the early 90s, at which point Tim Burton was the director, Kevin Smith the writer, and Nic Cage pegged for Superman (crazy, huh?).

      A plethora of directors, scripts, and a few leading actors have been plowed through since then, but it's really in the last year that this has caught fire (especially with Bryan Singer being named as director a few months ago). This has even escalated into a ridiculous public wager between a prominent comic writer (Mark Millar) and a movie rumors web site maven (Harry Knowles) as to the identity of the actor being considered to play Superman, and this preceeded Reeve's death by several months.

      There's plenty of other arguments to be made against this urban-legend-style assumption (i.e. the large amounts of time that it takes to bring a movie through pre-production, the unlikelihood that Reeves would have any business role in choosing his "successor" (cameos aside, how much role did he play in producing the "Lois & Clark" or "Smallville" series?), etc.

      At most you can accuse the movie companies of opportunism in the timing of this announcement (i.e. riding the wave of "Superman" interest following Reeve's death); however, assuming that Reeves would/could in any way be blocking the production of the film is pretty uninformed.

    11. Re:Anybody else by codeguy007 · · Score: 1


      The "next Superman movie" has been in development (many tens of millions of dollars worth, at this point, with nary a frame shot) since the early 90s, at which point Tim Burton was the director, Kevin Smith the writer, and Nic Cage pegged for Superman (crazy, huh?).

      That was the second attempt. There was even film shot for Superman V with Reeve as Superman. Apparently some scenes were taken from IV's cutting room floor. Just be glad the plug was pulled on that project. It could have killed superman forever.

    12. Re:Anybody else by EvanED · · Score: 1

      As others have said many, many places, the new Supes movie has been in production for a long time. When I was still a huge Superman nerd like 10 years ago or something and running around the school playground with a red cape they were working on Superman 5. Nicholas Cage was considered for Superman's role, and Luthor's headquarters was supposed to be the PPG building in Pittsburgh (which, by the way, is awesome). See http://home.netcom.com/~speaker6/what/superman.htm l; it's from 1997, and says Cage is playing Superman. That's over 7 years ago.

      What I don't see any mention of in the replies is that Douglas Adams had been working on producing the movie since at least the early 90's, and it didn't get much of anywhere.

  17. that dude is going to be "superman"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh..... uhm... okaaaaaayy?

    Well, I bet the new special effects will be pretty impressive.

  18. Time to move on by execom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We heard about every actor for Superman: Nicola Cage or Travolta, Fraser, or MacLachlan .

    I guess we need to wait more few years that Hollywood decides who will wears the Superman suit.
    Also will it be the old blue and red or the new white suit as it is in the latest update in the Comics ?

    --
    I need a Sino-Logic 16. Sogo-7 data-gloves, a GPL stealth module...
    1. Re:Time to move on by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Also will it be the old blue and red or the new white suit as it is in the latest update in the Comics ?

      New white suit? WTF? Superman wears blue and red and yellow. I don't know what Superman you're talking about, but it sure the hell isn't Jerry Siegel's Superman.

    2. Re:Time to move on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for a while, Superman was reduced to an energy-based form of life (after the whole sun-eater thing). His skin was blue, and his suit was mostly white. He "healed" a few years ago, and is back in his normal colours. I think he was all smurfy for a little over a year though.

  19. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

    Come on, you can't just search for somebody with Google image and assume that it is them. Did you think the woman in the second picture was him as well?

    In fact, google miss-identified the pictures in the source page (names were above the pictures, google assumes they are under.)

    This is the real picture of Brandon Routh on that page.

  20. w00t ! another superhero flick... by Maavin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd rather see a good "Tripods" Movie...
    that story has potential...

    --


    Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
    1. Re:w00t ! another superhero flick... by stud9920 · · Score: 0

      You mean that story with the tripods who have conquered the world, reverting umans to preindustrial condition and enslaving them with brain implants ? That was great indeed.

    2. Re:w00t ! another superhero flick... by wiredog · · Score: 1

      "Tripods" would work better as a mini-series.

    3. Re:w00t ! another superhero flick... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Good christ, I can't believe anyone else read those books. I loved them! So much so that 30 years later I tracked those puppies down so my wife could read them.

      With a good script and today's CGI the movies could be blockbusters, especially if they're geared for teens (like the books were).

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  21. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Lasuuco+Tulkas · · Score: 1

    Look closer and you'll see that the picture you link is actually that of Kamar Reyes.

    This is Brandon Routh.

  22. Re:Sick joke, right on time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I didn't know dead people could fly...

    You just need the right catapult.

  23. Don't know about that by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    But Teri Hatcher's breasts were the best Lois Lane breasts ever.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Don't know about that by Erebus · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't seen the girl playing Lois on "Smallville"

    2. Re:Don't know about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that's not Lana? They are different people, ya know.

    3. Re:Don't know about that by schpmock · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lois Lane in "Smallville", you be the judge.

    4. Re:Don't know about that by Issue9mm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With Charisma Carpenter potentially up for the role of the new Lois, that could change as well. :)

      -9mm-

    5. Re:Don't know about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what about Mischa Barton? Last I heard, she might be asked to do Lois Lane.

    6. Re:Don't know about that by sofakingon · · Score: 1

      I'd give my left nut (after the fact) to "do Lois Lane"

    7. Re:Don't know about that by cshark · · Score: 1

      They were a little small for my tastes. I thnk it would be safe to take them up a few sizes.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    8. Re:Don't know about that by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      Should that occur I will be all too happy to revise my statement.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  24. i don't think he'd want the role... by admactanium · · Score: 1

    i actually heard part of tom welling's contract for smallville specifically stated that he would never wear "the costume." probably a wise move if he plans to have a career after smallville. then again, i heard he didn't ever want to fly, but he did on the season opener this year. i doubt he'd want to commit himself to the big screen version requiring the suit and all.

  25. That all depends on whether you prefer them of the by Flibz · · Score: 2, Funny

    modern rounded or "vintage" pointy variety.

    I like the classic pointy ones ;)

  26. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, Ricky Martin is going to be Superman? Livin' la vida Estupendo!

  27. Who the heck is this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Who the heck is this guy?"

    Funny. Thats pretty much what people said about Christopher Reeve back when they revealed him as Superman.

  28. Re:crude humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: Which actor did Christopher Reeve admire the most?

    A: Christopher Walken.

    /one-way ticket please

  29. Domino slashdot effect? by syrinje · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Being un-versed in gal-soap tv, I tried searching for Brandon Routh and noticed this weird thing - on www.brandonrouth. Looks like Google is a /. vector now!

    www.brandonrouth.tv Temporarily Unavailable

    This account has surpassed its bandwidth allocation at the present time. You may reach the account administrator at www@www.brandonrouth.tv

    --
    See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
    1. Re:Domino slashdot effect? by arock99 · · Score: 1

      Actually just so your aware the bandwith allocation isue isn't because of slashdot. It's been like that for a few days now ever said the rumours of him being cast had gotten stronger.

    2. Re:Domino slashdot effect? by dargon · · Score: 0

      You mean, for once /. didn't kill a site? I'm shocked!!

  30. Re:Lame by wondermog · · Score: 1

    To quote a post on AICN:

    Blundetto
    " People would get too confused. They would think that this is 'Smallville - The Movie', similar to X-Files-film. And if Smallville continued after this film, regular viewers wouldn't understand why Welling is just Clark Kent again after being Superman in the film. I don't think that Singer and WB would like to explain this in every possible interview. "Yeah, we cast this kid from Smallville, but this isn't Smallville, this is Superman. These stories happen in different universes, you see. Yes, we know that all the characters have same names as in Smallville, and they are indeed THE SAME characters in a way, but still theses stories are totally different. Tom Welling playing Clark Kent here is totally different from Tom Welling playing Clark Kent in TV." Why is this so hard to understand? "

    --
    freeminimacs, just becau
  31. Superman vs Mecha-Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLEASE! Give us some super-hero fusion.
    The same old stuff has become tiring.

    Batman vs Aquaman (with subplot hookup of Johnny Quest, Hadji, and Robin threesome to add a little spice for the X version).

    Add some good Indiam filum music and it would be a hit for sure.

  32. A post from 1999: mod me insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear Bryan Singer is casting a tall Australian star of musical theatre as Wolverine! Why not pick an obvious short north american like Tom Cruise?

  33. Why Brian Singer? by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

    I know I'm in a minority here, but what exactly was so good about the X-men movies? I'll admit that the first one wasn't that bad, but X2? If his casting decisions are anywhere near as bad as they were for X-Men (with the exception of Hugh Jackman, of course), well... You get the idea.

    --
    Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    1. Re:Why Brian Singer? by SoTuA · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What's so bad about X-Men casting?

      Cyclops is a complete dick? check.

      Storm a shapely black woman that looks good in white hair? check.

      Prof. X? Spot on.

      Magneto? Maybe he could have found someone who didn't look as old/frail, but his acting was spot-on.

      Jean Grey is all but carbon-copied from the X-Men comics I used to own.

      The only casting choice I'd disagree with would be Rogue...

    2. Re:Why Brian Singer? by lavar78 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the only truly bad casting decision was Halle Berry (and even that gets a pass since, well, she's fine). You acknowledged Wolverine, but Xavier, Nightcrawler, Colossus (even in a small part), and especially Magneto were all excellent. I'm not surprised we disagree though, because I think X2 was a much better movie than the first one on every level possible. It really captured the essence of the X-Men. At any rate, Nightcrawler's attack on the White House and Magneto's escape from prison are magnificent; those two scenes alone are worth the price of admission.

      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    3. Re:Why Brian Singer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and watching Magneto smoke some dudes with a couple of iron marbles was pretty fierce. :D

    4. Re:Why Brian Singer? by elendel · · Score: 1

      Wolverine?

      Short, scrappy canuk (~5 ft, if I recall)... somehow, Hugh Jackman is just a little too tall (6+ feet? come on).

      --

      If I was worried about Karma, I'd eat tofu.
    5. Re:Why Brian Singer? by SoTuA · · Score: 1

      Yes, the height isn't all that great, but the makeup team managed (the hair team, actually :) to turn him into the exact image of the comic character. All he's missing is the "short" thing. And the attitude re: cyclops was really good :)

    6. Re:Why Brian Singer? by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Jean Grey is all but carbon-copied from the X-Men comics I used to own.

      Hey, while we're making these copies, do you think I could get one? I'd really like to have one of those.

      Thanks.

    7. Re:Why Brian Singer? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Check out this bit torrent tracker for comics:

      Z Cult FM Comic Tracker

      You should be able to find all the Jean Grey you need over there.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  34. Re:Sick joke, right on time by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

    When I read the title of the article, I thought they are talking about Christopher Reeve's funeral. I would not be surprised if he decided to arrange his ash in that way (fly to the Space)...

  35. Re:Christopher Reeve by 9mind · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This comment is so fcked up! Damn me for laughing!

  36. Re:Sick joke, right on time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ccreeeaaaak --- BOING!!!

    look, there he goes now!

  37. Re:Christopher Reeve by Ligur · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm so ashamed I lauged at that.
    I will avenge my conscience by modding you -1 troll!
    Hey wait.. if I post... NOOO!!

    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
  38. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong, this is Brandon Routh

  39. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by wondermog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, the fact that someone would do a google search and post the first thing that pops up as evidence of someone they've never seen really surprises me. Actually it doesn't. Here are some other photographs of him.

    http://www.geocities.com/televisioncity/9779/pubga l/pubgal2.html
    http://www.superman-v.com/news/images/brandonrouth .jpg
    http://soaphunks.net/routhb01.jpg
    http://soaphunks.net/routhb02.jpg

    Maybe Slashdot needs to leave the movie news to the movie sites?

    --
    freeminimacs, just becau
  40. Kevin Spacey? Wouldn't that mean... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...that he would be the 'Bald' guy? (If he is Lex Luthor that is...)

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Kevin Spacey? Wouldn't that mean... by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Lex originally had red hair - later on in the comics they brought that back when he cloned himself to fake his own death. Wouldn't mind a readheaded Lex.

      And as for Lex - good to hear they're getting a solid actor. For some reason that role tends to attract the most spectacular performers (the Movie Lex and the L&C Lex were both excellent).

    2. Re:Kevin Spacey? Wouldn't that mean... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I was going to agree when I thought you were making a joke about LEXX!

      I agree about the movie Lex (Gene Hackman), but I haven't watching L&C or Smallville.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Kevin Spacey? Wouldn't that mean... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I think how Lex portrayed in Smallville is awesome. Rosenbaum does an excellent job.

      At this point in Smallville, Lex hasn't gone completely Dark-Side yet. But he's still portrayed as dark and suave. Meanwhile, Lyonel Luthor is as evil as they come.

    4. Re:Kevin Spacey? Wouldn't that mean... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Michael Rosenbaum is a SPECTACULAR Lex Luthor. I think his work on Smallville will add several layers of humanity and depth to future LLs.

      I'm not touting the show in general, because while I enjoy it, it's not the best show in the world; However, Rosenbaum's Lex Luthor is pinnacle.

      -9mm-

    5. Re:Kevin Spacey? Wouldn't that mean... by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      Mitch Rosenbaum is a hack.

      --
      blog
  41. Gilmore Girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, you must really have a photographic memory, since I've watched every episode of Gilmore Girls and he's in it for literally 5 minutes as a bit part in the first season.....and that's all.

    1. Re:Gilmore Girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the confusion is coming from the fact he played a character named "Jess". Yes, Jess is a major character on the show, but this is not, however, Milo Ventimiglia, who played Jess Mariano (Luke's nephew) for most of the show's run.

    2. Re:Gilmore Girls? by gumpish · · Score: 1

      (Posting logged in, with karma bonus, cuz at Delta it's laid out like that.)

      Wow. samzenpus (the submitter) == douchebag.

      To samzenpus: You obviously have never actually watched Gilmore Girls, so shut the fuck up.

      (I was going to choose my words more gingerly, but unless I managed to make it REALLY FUNNY somehow, this comment would be modded down anyway.)

    3. Re:Gilmore Girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, there's always the "this comment would be modded down anyway." gambit.

    4. Re:Gilmore Girls? by gumpish · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, there's always the "this comment would be modded down anyway." gambit.

      I know - and it worked like a charm!

      Karma! My sweet, sweet karma! All for Silas! All for Silas! ::shoots jizz across keyboard::

  42. Oh won't somebody please think about the by Omroth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dean Cain fans!

    1. Re:Oh won't somebody please think about the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did but as neither fan was very personable they went with another actor.

  43. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is it with picking guys for masculine roles out of the Ultra-Gay Catalog?

  44. They're real by chegosaurus · · Score: 4, Funny

    and they're spec-tacular!

  45. I do have a photographic memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They call me the imdb.

  46. Tripods? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just for clarification, are you referring to the series of Samuel Youd childrens' books (writing under pen name of John Christopher) about alien invaders who ride in tripods and the young teenagers who still have free will (no pun intended)?
    • The White Mountains
    • The City of Gold and Lead
    • The Pool of Fire
    • When The Tripods Came (A prequel added later to the original trilogy)
    There have been adaptations of this story to other media, of which the BBC production is probably the most famous. There is a website that talks about these stories including a page on the Touchstone pictures movie attempt a few years ago.

    While these are good stories on their own, I'm not sure they'd make good Hollywood plots for movies. The teenage boys would need love interests. The technology could be easily shown with special effects of today, but its likely to be reworked as a special effects extravaganza (which the stories were not). I can also see the stories being called derivative of V and sense that movie makers would have to make changes to distinguish themselves from that story. All in all, it sounds like the Tripod stories are better off if they aren't soiled by Hollywood to me.

  47. The Chicknification of Everything by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Lordy lordy is there ANYTHING they won't make into a date movie?

  48. but the question us geeks want to know..... by nighty5 · · Score: 1

    does he run on linux?

  49. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goddamn...I'd hit it.

  50. Re:Christopher Reeve by xYoni69x · · Score: 1

    The Grassy Knoll wins the thread.

    --
    void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
  51. That ain't Superman ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's Swarthyman!

  52. Spider-Man cash-in? by Yolegoman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't help but feel like this is a cash-in on the recent Spider-Man movie franchise's popularity. Both Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 have done really well, and it seems to me like they are just trying to milk the superhero thing for everything they've got.

    Of course, I'm willing to be proven wrong. Give me a good old-fashioned B - Popcorn movie with decent Special FX, and an interesting Trailer for the film, and I'll certainly be in line.

    - Yolego

    1. Re:Spider-Man cash-in? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you haven't noticed the glut of comic book movies coming out.

      Punisher, Daredevil, Hellboy, Fantastic Four (2005), The Hulk, Batman Begins (2005), Constantine, etc etc.

      The success of the first Spider-Man movie has prompted comic book movies of all flavors to come out, because they're finaly starting to be decent, rather than the abortions that was the first Punisher, for example.

    2. Re:Spider-Man cash-in? by Yolegoman · · Score: 1

      No, I hadn't really noticed, although now that you mention it, Hulk / Helboy rings a bell. Not that I've been paying attention. Most of the crap that comes out of Hollywood is, well, crap.

      The first time I have actually bought a recent Hollywood movie was the first Spider-Man. I liked that one so well, I actually went and paid to see the second one at the dollar theater: It was certainly worth $0.50 per ticket, although the popcorn is not worth $10.00 per bucket.

      But for the most part, you are dead right. I hadn't noticed.

    3. Re:Spider-Man cash-in? by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      It's really DC cashing in on the success of the various Marvel superhero flicks of late.

      Not that I mind. Bryan Singer is set to direct (Of X-Men, X2, and Usual Suspects) and thus far it appears that he can do no wrong

    4. Re:Spider-Man cash-in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more due to the success of the first X-Men movie. That's what sparked all this shit.

    5. Re:Spider-Man cash-in? by aztektum · · Score: 1

      They've been trying to make a new Superman movie since the mid-late 90's. Kevin Smith even wrote a script for it.

      Tim Burton was going to direct and wanted Nic Cage as Superman.

      I don't think any superhero movie is trying to cash on on Spider-Man, but just trying to cash in period.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    6. Re:Spider-Man cash-in? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Kevin Smith even wrote a script for it.

      There's a great story on "An Evening with Kevin Smith" about how that happened. Most of it concentrated on the producer who Kevin describes as nutty. He wanted a giant spider in the movie for reasons that no one else could understand. Of course, the Superman movie didn't happen at that point, but there was a movie called Wild Wild West soon after. You may recall (if you managed to watch the whole thing) that somewhere in the third act, a giant fucking mechanical spider shows up.

  53. I guess you're voting for Bush, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Because, as we all know, John Edwards has already tastelessy tried to take advantage of Christopher Reeve. To paraphrase: "When John Kerry is President, people like Christopher Reeve will walk again."

    To say that on the day after Mr. Reeve died goes beyond boorish.

    And heaven forbid your standards for elected office be lower than your standards for posting to /., right?

    Watch this be modded troll or flamebait by those folks that do have higher standards for slashdot posting than they do for those running for Vice President.

    1. Re:I guess you're voting for Bush, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent post!

  54. You're not really that ignorant, are you? by kirbini · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What are you talking about? Of course people knew who Chirstopher Reeves was. Have you never seen the original Superman TV series with George Reeves? He was the original, everyone knew him (and his problems, but that's another story) and most of the world was very happy when his son, Christopher, was chosen to carry on the legacy on the silver screen. George was and still is the best Superman.

    I have to agree with a previous poster, you /.'ers are getting too effing young.

    1. Re:You're not really that ignorant, are you? by Rev+Wally · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're serious. George Reeves and Christopher Reeve (Note the lack of an "s") are not related.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:You're not really that ignorant, are you? by kirbini · · Score: 0

      Finally! Someone in this thread who actually knows something.

      Everything I said about George is true except the paternal relationship, as you so correctly pointed out. I threw in the popular misconception just to see if there were any fogies left in this thread or if the'd all been driven away by the "Dean Cain is bester than the Smallvill guy" drivel.

      Thanks for restoring my /. faith.

    3. Re:You're not really that ignorant, are you? by indros · · Score: 1
      He was the original, everyone knew him (and his problems, but that's another story) and most of the world was very happy when his son, Christopher, was chosen to carry on the legacy on the silver screen.


      Not that this already hasn't been debunked or anything, but also the chances of that, even if he was really his dad, were pretty slim as George had killed himself almost 2 decades earlier.
    4. Re:You're not really that ignorant, are you? by the+quick+brown+fox · · Score: 1
      Do you realize how senseless your post is when you remove the paternal relationship?

      What are you talking about? Of course people knew who Chirstopher Reeves was. Have you never seen the original Superman TV series with George Reeves? He was the original, everyone knew him (and his problems, but that's another story) and most of the world was very happy when [a random guy named Christopher who has a similar last name], was chosen to carry on the legacy on the silver screen. George was and still is the best Superman.

  55. Set to fly? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    He already flew in the first episode of this season, and floated in the first episode of season 1. ANd the one episode with the Tornado (end of season two maybe) he sorta flew towards Lana.
    ;)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Set to fly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no other way to put this ... you are a dumbass.

  56. Just tell me... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    that the Salkinds won't be involved.

    The first Superman movie was OK in a campy sort of way, but to flog a limp franchise through three sequels, each worse than the last and none as good as the first, should be criminal.

    Of course, if it was, half of Hollywood would be hanging around the corner of Pico and Alvarado holding "Will write/direct/star for food" signs...

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
    1. Re:Just tell me... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You're raving mad, man. Bloody nuts. Superman was -not- a limp franchise. For the day, the films were quite good - at least better than their peers by quite a bit. Today, they look dated and cheesy, but the Superman films were good action with a strong, likeable hero, an atypical heroine (somewhat), and an awesome arch nemesis (Gene Hackman!).

      The theme for Superman? Composed by John Williams.

      Every trilogy (or multology) that John Williams has been involved with has done excellent, and has been quite popular. Star Wars. Indiana Jones. Jurassic Park. Jaws, Home Alone. Hell, even many of the "standalone" films he's worked on have been incredible in their own respect, such as ET, AI (say what you will for the deviation from Asimov's work, it was still a good film), The Patriot, Braveheart, Saving Private Ryan, Born on the 4th of July, These aren't just "movies", mind you, these are epics that have become a part of our culture, played over and over, and tirelessly parodied. "Dun dun dun dun" (jaws). "Dun dun da! da da dum da!" (superman). Et cetera! Hell, he even composed the theme for Gilligan's Island! Damn near every one of the tunes from those films and show can be recalled and hummed by anyone from the age of 18 to 30. Granted, the fact that Williams composed for the Superman films doesn't automatically give creedence to the films, but there was a multology, and the films are widely remembered for the character of Clark Kent as well.

      Just because you're not creative enough to suspend your disbelief doesn't mean the movies suck. I saw these films as a child (8? 10?), and even then they were kind of cheesy to me. Yet I still was able to see the hero that was Clark Kent. I was still able to see strength of positive character that he portrayed, the honesty, and the humility - all in spite of his tremendous power. There's absolutely nothing wrong with stereotypes being used in film when they're well done. I still think Superman is a good film.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  57. Dean Cain? The REAL Superman?! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Sure, if you're twelve. Whereas I agree that Reeve remains the quintessential Supes, he had a tough time prying the crown from this guy's troubled brow. For many of us growing up, George Reeves was the real dealio. Ever wonder from what specific piece of pop culture these lines came from?

    "Rocketed to earth from a dying planet
    Faster than a speeding bullet
    Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound
    And who, disguised as Clark Kent, mild-mannered reporter for a great metropolitan newspaper,
    Fights a never ending battle for Truth, Justice, and the American Way."

    Reeve was great, may he rest in piece. But it was Reeves and that show from the '50's that are the stuff pop culture legends are built upon.

  58. Re:Dean Cain? The REAL Superman?! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Not to mention:

    "Look! Up In The Sky!
    "It's a Bird!"
    "It's a Plane!"
    "It's... Superman!!"

    As a fan of the current Smallville, I get a kick out of how the writers have frequently paid homage to these iconic phrases in their TV show some 40-odd years later.

  59. Comics and stereotypes... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well for one, I like the Smallville story. They present us a vulnerable, guy with problems like everybody else, who wants to hear about caped princes on their stallions to "fight for justice"? Way outdated. (Not that we don't need an idealist hero in this screwed up time, but we need a REAL one)

    But if they make a batman based on "Batman of the Future", yeah cool. :)

    I remember reading the history of comics on a TV documentary.
    (related history of comics link).

    Comics are always made by people based on the time's moral standards and public expectations.

    Like for example, the wonder woman was so popular in the time where women were seen as inferior. One day the guy decided to take away her powers, and the story sucked. Lotsa women protested against that.

    And Flash Gordon. Always rescuing the girl. Because in that time, i don't know about you, but IMHO women just acted stupid and submissive.

    Another example? Captain America. It was made in WW2. Everybody wanted to see Hitler smashed by capn's shield. Good ol' times when America was the REAL Iron fist of democracy. Is it a coincidence that the "Golden Age" of comics was from 1938 to 1945, just as the WWII?

    So, in those days, superheroes were seen as Role models. "What I want my child to be". But now they're the escape of teenagers who can't find their own place. Look at the latest comic movies. Do they focus on the superpowers, or more on the personal problems and conflicts of the heroes (Spiderman, Daredevil)? And they're a hit.

    So yeah, the script guys BETTER give us a good movie adapted to our current times, or we'll smash the reels on their faces.

    1. Re:Comics and stereotypes... by Mant · · Score: 1

      It's pretty sad when someone considers fighting for justice to be outdated.

      On of the things I really like in Smallville is you see Clark keep always trying to do the right thing, one of the defining things about Superman. The setting may be updated, but it is actually the traditional core of the character, and ties right into all that corny fighting for justice stuff.

      As for "Comics are always made by people based on the time's moral standards and public expectations." Well Duh. You could replace comics with "films" or "books" or any popular entertainment.

      As for focusing on personal problems, that isn't new. The films you cite are based on Marvel properties, and that is a part of Marvel's style, less earthsahking powers and more focus on the personal side. They have been doing that for decades.

  60. Superman will never equal this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    [From "The Incredibles" trailer:]
    Lucius Best: Honey? Where's my super suit?
    Woman: What?
    Lucius Best: Where - is - my - super - suit?
    Woman: Why - do - you - need - to - know?
    Lucius Best: [helicopter explodes outside] You tell me where my suit is, woman!

  61. Re:crude humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the opposite of Christopher Reeve?

    (wait for it......)

    Christopher Walken!

  62. Old dude. by LothDaddy · · Score: 1

    "Kid from Smallville"? Ha! I went to high school with Tom Welling, he's probably 25-26 years old now. Very, 90210-ish, having a 20-something person playing a teen.

    1. Re:Old dude. by will_die · · Score: 1

      You hit 30 and every one under you is a kid, once you hit 50 I think you can upgrade that to "young wippersnapper"

  63. Re:John Kerry raises Christopher Reeves from Dead by hey! · · Score: 1

    It's weird, but Kerry, Reeve and I happen to have a mutual friend. My friend talked to Chris Reeve the day before he died. Reeve was very excited and happy about Kerry's performance in the debates. They knew about the pressure wound, but his death the next day was a huge shock. It just spun out of control.

    In any case when Kerry brings up Reeve, it isn't the usual political grave robbing. He really was a close friend.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  64. Or cremated. by bartyboy · · Score: 1

    Sorry to burst your bubble. Walt was cremated.

  65. What?!? by nicktripp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why did the original poster list him as "of Gilmore Girls"? If he had bothered to read the profile at IMDB that he linked (instead of just looking for a picture?), he would have seen that he was only on one episode of "Gilmore Girls", yet he was on the soap opera "One Life to Live" for two years and MTV's "Undressed" for another year. Unforunately, it seems most of you fell for this and are were immediately biased based on his one appearance on a WB show.

    1. Re:What?!? by boiscout · · Score: 1

      Actually he played on a whole season of Gilmore Girls. And he's quite the fine actor.

      I think he's well qualified for this role.

      --
      "Shut up about my driving. You're still alive."
    2. Re:What?!? by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      No, no he didn't. He played in one episode, the one where they go to the Bangles concert and "corrupts" Rory's friends. You're confusing him with the other "Jess."

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    3. Re:What?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! A soap AND MTV! I'm much happier with him now. NOT.

    4. Re:What?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unforunately, it seems most of you fell for this and are were immediately biased based on his one appearance on a WB show.
      Thereby depriving him of the cachet attached to appearing on an MTV show.
  66. where was /. when Christopher Reeve passed away? by funkdancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't know about you guys, but to me Reeve was a very big man not only being the best Superman there could ever be but also for the strength and incredible courage he showed when almost everything was taken away from him in that accident.

    I checked in then and several times of the next few days, over and over again, to see any mention of it and a thread regarding his life and his fight for pushing technologies and research in the spinal areas, but alas no mention at all. It would not be an understatement to say that I did get quite emotional thinking about how he would not live to witness the fruits of all that will be discovered in the next 10 years.

    So I guess I've finally found the thread to oust my disappointment with the editors.... Just to think that only the _new superman_ warrants mention when a _great one_ passed away. Bloody good one, mates.

    --
    ISO certified == THX certified
  67. He'd best start on 'roids ASAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is WAY too scrawny to be Superman.

  68. Re:crude humor by TonyZahn · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's so recursive... my head asplode!

    --
    - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
  69. There really is a curse!!!! by spuke4000 · · Score: 1
    From the CNN article: Kirk Alyn played bit parts and minor supporting roles in several low-budget films before getting his big break playing the title role in the 1948 serial "Superman." But after the serial ended, he failed to sustain a film career and retired to Arizona.

    Arizona... poor bastard, he never even had a chance.

    --
    This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
  70. Re:Christopher Reeve by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    Would you prefer a window or aisle seat?

  71. christopher reeve by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    Christopher Reeve would surely have been part of the production team in some capacity. Superman should hit theaters around summer 2006

    Is there any proof to this, I can't imagine Christopher Reeve helping with a new superman movie just because he was in a different superman movie 10 years ago.

  72. Norwalk, IA by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    Well I used to live in Norwalk IA. It qualifies as "Smallville" I think.

    But then so do thousands of midwestern towns, just like the one I grew up in.

    OK, now I wanna be Superman too!!!!

  73. Bulging Spandesticles. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Funny

    And we all remember how bulging spandesticles look, right? Right? ... I still have flashbacks, and my friends don't trust random things I IM them any more...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  74. Reeves certainly could participate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had he lived, Christopher Reeves would have made an absolutely perfect Lex Luthor.
    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/041 020/photos_eo_en/f0ae106f59a6576debea0213dde273c8

  75. Jess?! by nazokoneko · · Score: 1

    At first I thought wow, Dean from Gilmore Girls would be the perfect Superman! Then I realized Roush plays Jess, the scrawny little New Joisey trailer trash. Bad call.

    1. Re:Jess?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing, Dean would make a great superman, but this guy isn't the same Jess you're thinking of, he's someone else.

  76. Smallville by GFLPraxis · · Score: 1

    They really should use the actors from Smallville. It sorta sucks to have the movie and the show have completely different actors.

  77. here's why by Savatte · · Score: 1

    unlike other contemporary "action" directors attached to the franchise (Brett Rattner, McG), Brian Singer actually knows how to competently direct an action scene, as well as how to control actors to get decent performances out of them. He can rake in the big bucks, while keeping the critics relatively happy.

  78. Re:crude humor by Savatte · · Score: 1

    Q: What's the opposite of Christopher Reeve?

    A: Christopher Walken

  79. Fan reaction had NOTHING to do with it by doublem · · Score: 1

    Fan reaction had nothing to do with his recovery. they planned Azreal to be a temporary replacement for the get go. Notice that the "mystic" was introduced and her back story being told as soon as Wayne's back was broken.

    I hate to break it to you, but fan reaction had NOTHING to do with it. Those story lines are mapped out months in advance.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  80. Reeve's involvement by sixpaw · · Score: 1

    While I doubt that he would have been involved in the film's production, everyone involved in the movie wanted to get him a cameo in the movie (presumably not unlike the one he had in Smallville). From what I've seen in the last few days there's still some talk of doing it, through the magic of computer editing -- make of that what you will.

  81. Re:christopher reeve by doublem · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine Christopher Reeve helping with a new superman movie just because he was in a different superman movie 10 years ago.

    Nope, it's because of his injuries that he would have been involved, as there was this whole guilt thing over him.

    He would have been involved because of the sympathy vote.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  82. No matter who the actor is someone will be unhappy by jzarling · · Score: 1

    No actor really encapulates Superman. They are either too young, too short, wrong hair color (Val Kilmers Batman) to wirily (Val Kilmer), or just plain wrong for the role - again Val Kilmer as Batman.

    I think it was Roger Ebert who said something to the effect of "superheros should be cast by thier chins", this is how we got George Clooney as Batman, who wasnt bad, I think he was the best Bruce Wayne, and he had the best chin in the batsuit.

    Point being one actor will never really measure up. Christopher Reeve was very close - but he wasnt ripped enough, Dean Cain was ripped but he was not physically imposing. The kid on Smallville works well because, he is a kid, and this is Clark as a kid.

    I think Superman should be animated, and done in the style of the the Justice League on Cartoon network.
    Comics are cartoons - Live action will NEVER measure up.

    IMHO - The best comic - bigscreen transfer was Batman: Mask of the Phantasm.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  83. Re:where was /. when Christopher Reeve passed away by rpillala · · Score: 1

    http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/12/ 2233227&tid=206&tid=209

    The topic itself isn't like you describe but many of the comments are. Doesn't absolve the editors though.

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  84. Re:christopher reeve by mios · · Score: 1

    Did you see his cameo in Smallville?

    I bet he would have been in a new movie as well ... I mean shit, William Shatner manages to make his way back into your random star-trek spin off.

    To a great many people Christopher Reeve /is/ Superman ... shit, the comic book character looked like him, new dude in smallville looks like him .. he would have been in there just like Stan Lee pops his head into every Marvell movie that comes out.

  85. Woulda been kinda cool by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Had Christopher Reeves not passed to have had him a freind of Supermans and made him like a Tech geek that SM looked to for all things technical and had him monitoring world radio transmissions for trouble. Kinda SM's sidekick. Though it was never really in any of the SM stories, I think it would have ruled. Having grown up with CR playing SM and all.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  86. I think this is a pic by jcrash · · Score: 1

    Brandon Routh?

    But, that's just a guess.

    --
    I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
  87. Re:Digital Reeve by nempo · · Score: 1

    k, this would be my last post on slashdot. How anyone can consider my previous post as a troll is waaay beyond me. It has 'Interesting' written all over it imo.

    --
    --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
  88. Terrible curse by mitchellandrews · · Score: 1, Funny

    I agree with the curse, everyone who has been associated with Superman or Clark Kent seem to suffer a terrible fate. Just look at Dean Cain on Ripley's.

  89. I know Brandon by Michael+O-P · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I suspect no one is reading this thread now that it's older, but some of the comments piss me off. I know they shouldn't, and I shouldn't take them personally, but the ignorance and insensitivity of some people just bugs me.

    I'm from Norwalk, IA, and I've known Brandon since he was born. My mom called me with the news when she was in the room with his parents as they got the word from him. At first I couldn't believe it. There's no stinkin' way I know Superman! I babysat Superman! (I'm adding it to my resume). I went to church with Superman!

    I can see why he got cast, given his small town roots and the director's desire for an "unknown". He's very humble and unassuming, yet he can step up and play stronger roles. In his early 20's, he did more slacker stuff (obviously), but I think it will work. Time will tell, I guess.

    His sister is a "DJ" on an internet radio station.

    I look forward to seeing him in this big-time role, in spite of the fact it's a "summer blockbuster" and those usually suck. He's a really good guy, and he's planning to never ride a horse ever again.

    --
    I'm Peggy.
    1. Re:I know Brandon by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      His nice-ness and acting ability aren't in question, it's his looks. He's not nearly pumped enough to play the man of steel. The role needs someone with strong broad shoulders, lantern jaw, etc.

  90. For Great Truth, Justice and American Way by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Since Bush killed Superman before stemcells could get him to fly again, we must complete the research and resurrect the Man of Steel before this remake wipes out his memory forever. First step: destroy evil supergenius President VP Cheney in his secret HQ, before he can remotely control Bush into spreading kryptonite across the surface of Earth.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:For Great Truth, Justice and American Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FACT: Government funded stem cell research was illegal under Clinton.

      FACT: Government funded stem cell research was legalized under Bush.

      FACT: Stem cell research was going on for almost 10 years before Bush took office.

      FACT: Stem cell research can be funded by a few rich movies stars, not taxpayers.

    2. Re:For Great Truth, Justice and American Way by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      FACT: George Bush killed Superman, Anonymous evil villain Coward.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  91. Re:where was /. when Christopher Reeve passed away by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    I sbmitted the story about an hour after the news hit, but it was rejected...

  92. More important than the actor is the director by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    Atrophe seems to have affected people's memory - The Superman movies were mostly bad according to the collective ratings at IMDB. Forget my personal opinion that they were all bad other than Superman 3 (where he took on the Leatherboy Association).

    Even more importantly, the reason that Superman movies were not made for so long was how badly the last one did at the box office.

    The Xmen movies, however, were very well acclaimed and made a fortune, so a director who knows what he is doing is far more important than whichever guy puts on the tights.

  93. I found some pictures by bigmanjq · · Score: 1

    His website brandonrouth.tv is not available, but his site has been archived with the Way Back Machine on archive.org. It looks like he even dressed up as superman (aka Clark Kent) for halloween some previous year. Here's his picture from the archive. Archived Halloween Picture I backed up a smaller version (I don't know my bandwidth limit though): My backup Hopefull he's put on some weight since this. He looks kinda skinny to be superman.

  94. Re:Aince there is no pic at imdb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    actually the original superman was always designed to be a gay oriented character.

    Trolling bullshit, from someone who probably couldn't even name the character's creators without looking them up... in one of his middle school science textbooks.

  95. Christopher Reeve's opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This one is a little obsolete now, but on the other hand it still makes sense...

    Q: Which actor could be considered to be the opposite of Christopher Reeve?

    A: Christopher Walken

  96. TV Tome has a picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who have not yet figured out how to use a search engine, here is a picture of the guy:

    http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/PersonGalle ry Page/personid-84875/

    Good choice... he looks like Christopher Reeve when he was younger!

  97. Re:christopher reeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The screenwriter, along with Bryan Singer, were both quoted as having said that Christopher Reeve would have participated in the new movie, although they were not sure in what capacity.

  98. Re:That all depends on whether you prefer them of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really don't see why women feel the need to enhance their breasts.

    There is a whole legion of men like me who like women just as they are.

    Then again, being a nerd, I'd like any breast.

  99. hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your days are numbered you talentless hacks

  100. Does it mean I'm going to hell.... by bill11082 · · Score: 1

    if when I read the headline of this article, I immediately thought "Weekend at Bernie's 3"

    --
    DANGER! 10,000 Ohms
  101. Some of us wanted Abe Vigoda by Orthogonal+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny


    For once, I'd like an OLD superman, who'd rather put his feet up and watch bowling.

    And maybe for Lois Lane, we could have Courtney Love with a dye job. Or Margot Kidder. What's the difference, anyway?

  102. Re:where was /. when Christopher Reeve passed away by funkdancer · · Score: 1

    Many thanks - I will read this now! Was this exclusive to the games section, i.e. not front page news? Or did I just manage to miss it somehow?

    --
    ISO certified == THX certified
  103. Superman needs a superpet, like Bathound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe a Superhorse that can do sweet jumps over buildings in a single bound?

    1. Re:Superman needs a superpet, like Bathound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, a supersteed that travels at NECKBREAK speeds.

  104. NOT FROM GILMORE GIRLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the guy was in one episode. He's a friggen soap "star".. don't know what kind of moron chose to define him as being from Gilmore Girls.

  105. I hope by Audacious · · Score: 1

    I think one of the nicest things they could do in the movie is to have Superman put flowers on Superman's grave.

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  106. I can appreciate Reeve as much as the next guy by EdZep · · Score: 1

    But, just what would he have brought to a new Superman production? Reeve was an Actor. When he played Superman, he uttered the words written by script writers, wearing the costume designed by others, on the sets built by a production crew, with the facial and vocal expressions required by a director. What special expertise would Reeve have added?

    Is the supposition below based on fact, or on the writer's emotional need to elevate Reeve beyond reason?

    >> Had it not been for his recent passing, Christopher Reeve would surely have been part of the production team in some capacity.

  107. Re:John Kerry raises Christopher Reeves from Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Kerry was as close to Reeve as he is to Cheney's lesbian daughter.

  108. One of the creators of Superman was gay by registro · · Score: 1

    One of the two original creators of Superman was gay. The director of the movie is openly gay. And Superman is, well, a SUPER man. Who's so interested on men made of steel anyway more than gay men do?
    The question is, why do YOU want to be superman.

  109. Re:christopher reeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, there's no proof. But Reeve's popularity in recent years would have made it logical. He was tapped for an episode of the Superman television show, "Smallville." Besides which, the recent spat of comic book movies has been notorious for cameo appearances: Stan Lee in "Spider-Man," Kevin Smith in "Daredevil," etc.

    Personally, I'll be surprised and disappointed if Adam West doesn't show up in "Batman Begins." I think he'd make a perfect Ra's al Ghul, which isn't likely to happen -- but I do expect he'll pop onscreen somehow.

  110. What's the opposite of Christopher Reeve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christopher Walken.

  111. Brandon Routh! by radishthegreat · · Score: 1
    Here's an article about Routh from the Des Moines Register.

    He's the second Superman from Iowa, the first being George Reeve.

  112. Re:That all depends on whether you prefer them of by randomblast · · Score: 1

    Even Meatloaf's?

    --
    ...these aren't my real teeth.
  113. Re:where was /. when Christopher Reeve passed away by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 1

    Heh, the story went public at 3:06 AM, and I submitted a story at 3:44AM....REJECTED :D

    I don't blame them, because there really isn't a relavant section to assign it...science fiction seemed like the best match...