Slashdot Mirror


Firefox nears 50 Million Downloads

bluephone writes "Firefox hit 49,000,000 downloads last night. Today, as we approach 50,000,000, SpreadFirefox is offering prizes for photographic proof of your most amazing spectacles to celebrate. To quote: 'We have a handful of unique prizes that you won't find anywhere else, and we're asking you to do one simple thing to claim one: impress us. As we drive toward 50 million downloads, do something so cool, so unusual and so spectacular to spread Firefox that we can't help but scurry around the Mozilla Foundation to tell every one.' But you don't have long. The Infocraft Firefox Counter shows just over 800,000 downloads left at the time of this submission!"

202 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Swimming? by Avsen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any devs volunteered to swim the Pacific over this?

    --


    Massive networking attempt for friends

    1. Re:Swimming? by tehshen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, Firefox can't go swimming, because the flames will go out. Which sucks. Maybe the Opera guy could find it and snuggle up to it for warmth if it lasts long enough.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    2. Re:Swimming? by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, Firefox can't go swimming, because the flames will go out.

      Ah, now I get the joke on this link:
      "Should we lower Mitchell, our fearless president, into an erupting volcano?"
      It's a parody of the Opera Atlantic swim, Firefox style!

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    3. Re:Swimming? by __aahrlq8808 · · Score: 1
      We've spent long nights in a tiny conference room here in Mountain View trying to figure out how to celebrate this momentous occasion. Should we lower Mitchell, our fearless president, into an erupting volcano? Send her backpacking through the Alps?

      Swimming?, that's soooo last week.

    4. Re:Swimming? by VolcomPimp · · Score: 1

      No but I'll program a retarded java app w/ an atlas and a fake counter which shows one of them swimming to redmond and taking a dump.

    5. Re:Swimming? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Someone should WHIP IT OUT, and paint it "49,000,000 users".

      The FCC, congress, and every religious sector will be pissed. Firefox will get publicity on every news station. It'll top Michael Jackson and IE for sure after that.

  2. Firefox and the Slashdot set by winkydink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The subset of people who visit Network Mirror are showing 75% Firefox & 22% IE.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by baadger · · Score: 1

      What about Opera? care to divulge?

    2. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by winkydink · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's the whole list. IIRC, Opera can be configured to say it's either IE or FF, so their numbers are probably a little low.

      75.72% Mozilla
      22.50% Microsoft Internet Explorer
      0.22% Opera/8.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)
      0.13% Opera/7.54 (X11; Linux i686; U) [en]
      0.12% Opera/7.54 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [en]
      0.10% Opera/8.0 (X11; Linux i686; U; en)
      0.09% Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.google.com/bot.html)
      0.09% Opera/7.54 (Windows NT 5.0; U) [en]
      0.07% Googlebot-Image/1.0
      0.04% Opera/8.0 (Windows NT 5.0; U; en)
      0.03% Opera/7.54 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [nb]
      0.03% Opera/8.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)
      0.03% Opera/7.23 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [en]
      0.03% Schmozilla/v9.14 Platinum
      0.03% Mediapartners-Google/2.1

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    3. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by thepotoo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Does anyone know what the stats are for a major site like google or yahoo? It would be more meaningful to see that.

      This is really a great day for open source and Firefox. Hopefully, most of those downloads are being used and not just sitting around (although I suspect that a few people are downloading FF several times).

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    4. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by baadger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cheers!

      Interesting there there is 8.00 and 8.0. BTW I think Opera still appends 'Opera' to the user-agent when set to identify as IE or Firefox/Mozilla.

    5. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Netmetrix is probably what you're looking for.

      My stats show those whom the marketeers classify as early adopters.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    6. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by tehshen · · Score: 1

      Adds up to 99.23%, not much of a complete list ;) Though it's probably rounding errors in Mozilla and IE which you haven't given platforms for.

      What's 'Schmozilla' anyway?

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    7. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by baadger · · Score: 1

      This blog post seems to explain it, apparently it's the user-agent used in an example in a perl cookbook

    8. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by winkydink · · Score: 1

      It's top 15. This is straight from Webalizer. It can probably be hacked to give OS breakdowns, but my "copious free time" list is pretty long at the moment. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    9. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by nacturation · · Score: 1

      The rest is likely all search engine bots.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by ditto999999999999999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just checked it out. Here is what Opera uses as the user agent:

      "Identify as opera": Opera/8.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)

      "Identify as MSIE 6": Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; en) Opera 8.0

      Thats neat, I thought it would have not advertised itself as Opera at all.

    11. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by Jaspers · · Score: 1

      check this out as well

    12. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by bogie · · Score: 1

      I'll take your word for it as far as your particular site goes, but as far as the rest of the Internet is concerned Firefox use is way higher than .5%. More like try moving that decimal point to the right a notch. I bet even Microsoft.com shows way higher than .5% Firefox usage.

      FWIW
      http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?a rticle=6 263

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    13. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      FYI, so FF too can be configured to masquerade as another browser.

      I'll bet not many people do that unless it's necessary, and same with Opera users.

      Truth be told, I recon your the weight of Opera users masquerading would probably be pretty low, possibly so low as to not skew the numbers.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    14. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The default setting in Opera is to pretend to be MSIE6.0

    15. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by shellbeach · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's 'Schmozilla' anyway?

      Seems a bit of a puzzle, have a look at

      http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2004/12/wizard.yel lowbrick.oz/

      or

      http://www.cleverhack.com/blog/archives/000887.htm l

      Whoever's doing this has obviously been around for a while, since the second link is from 2003 ...

    16. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      Then that's even more telling about IE's numbers.

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    17. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by bergwitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone is downloading Firefox several times.
      Download Firefox 1.0, update Firefox to 1.0.1, 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. That's four downloads of the whole package. 50 million/4 = 12,5 million.
      It's nice with 12,5 million users, but it's not 50 millions.

      --
      Evolution is just a scientific theory. Creationism is not.
    18. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by Mathiasdm · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Some people download the browser several times, others download it one time and install it on hundreds of computers.

      Also, not all users download it 4 times. I use the update feature (that's not counted with those 50 million).

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    19. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Then that's even more telling about IE's numbers.

      Yeah, instead of 95% mkt share, they'll be at 94.999% mkt share... ;)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    20. Re:Firefox and the Slashdot set by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I would say it's more like 85% going to 83%, but obviously it depends on the site..

  3. Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did the article just ask me to go on a mass shooting spree while wearing a firefox shirt?

    1. Re:Hmmm. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did the article just ask me to go on a mass shooting spree while wearing a firefox shirt?

      Yes. In Redmond.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:Hmmm. by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 1

      With a water-rifle full of blue paint... How many Windows in Redmond can *you* blue-screen ;)

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
    3. Re:Hmmm. by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      why should I send them a photo of my feet? That's a weird fetish for celebrating software distribution milestones.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    4. Re:Hmmm. by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      With a water-rifle full of blue paint... How many Windows in Redmond can *you* blue-screen ;)

      No no no, use a water-rifle full of napalm instead. There's a reason why it's called REDmond. :)

  4. GNU is a virus = X rated photos? by lilmouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I'm told GNU is like a Virus, and FireFox is open source, so I can think of a great way *I'd* like to spread it!

    Of course, they may have trouble posting the pictures on spreadfirefox!

    --LWM

    1. Re:GNU is a virus = X rated photos? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is Slashdot.

      Infecting your hand doesn't count as "spreading it".

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:GNU is a virus = X rated photos? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Depends what you touch afterward.....

    3. Re:GNU is a virus = X rated photos? by lilbudda · · Score: 1

      Gives a new meaning to spreading firefox. hmm... and if you get a redhead to boot ;-)

    4. Re:GNU is a virus = X rated photos? by factoryjoe · · Score: 1

      At least you can wear protection to make sure you're safe.

  5. Like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    #!/bin/bash
    :start
    wget http://www.mozilla.org/Firefox1.0.3Setup.exe
    rm Firefox1.0.3Setup.exe
    goto start

    Besides, real men use Opera.

    1. Re:Like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      >Besides, real men use Opera.

      Real man use telnet to port 80 or lynx, they don't eat quiche either...

    2. Re:Like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I guess it's sort of spectacular that you use goto statements in your bash scripts.

      This site will teach you how to use for and while loops: http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/unix/bash-tute .html

    3. Re:Like this? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Does netcat piped through sed count?

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    4. Re:Like this? by me+at+werk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know it's feeding a troll, but here's some information:

      The calculations are from bouncer. That means clicks from the webpage, or grabs of that URI. Getting files off the FTP is not counted at all towards the goal. Thenceforth, all your script would do is waste bandwidth.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    5. Re:Like this? by truedfx · · Score: 1

      You completely missed the point. bash doesn't support goto in any way whatsoever. The goto syntax that was used is from DOS batch files.

    6. Re:Like this? by shish · · Score: 1

      Real men take management positions within opera corp, and line up to be "next CEO"...

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    7. Re:Like this? by biglig2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pah! Real men put the Cat5 in their mouth and interpret the tingling.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    8. Re:Like this? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Getting files off the FTP...

      Did you read the shell script in the OP? He's getting files off the http host, not over ftp...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    9. Re:Like this? by juggleme · · Score: 3, Funny

      I doubt it. Real men aren't going to do fellatio on a cat5 cable (how else are you going to do a GET?) to read a web page.

    10. Re:Like this? by me+at+werk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was merely pointing out example. If you go to http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/ and grab the latest-release, it's not counted. You can't get the file off the www.mozilla.org http, either. Looks like I'll have to go further into this.

      When you click the "Download Firefox" link, you are sent here:

      http://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-1.0 .3 &os=win&lang=en-US

      Please note download (not www) is taking this, and a script is activated to pick a mirror. This script, Bouncer, picks a server and sends you there, and counts a download. That's how (i believe) it is counted. I have word from Asa that downloads from the FTP (and ftp over http) which weren't initiated through the webpage/link, are not counted. However you don't have to believe me on that, as the original question I asked was in regards to nightlies, so it's still possible I'm wrong.

      If you go to download.mozilla.org and notice it redirects to www.mozilla.org, and feel like you should point that out to pretend you have found the secret (that download. is merely an alias for www.), I have something for you, too.

      http://www.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-1.0.3&os =w in&lang=en-US fails. It does not download the product. If download. were an alias for www., shouldn't it work?

      Conclusion: The grand-something-parent's script would not work as written, or nearly as written. :)

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    11. Re:Like this? by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      "OP isn't using bash" - AC

      "#!/bin/bash" -OP

      Um...?

    12. Re:Like this? by camusflage · · Score: 1

      There ain't no way in hell I'm going to do a HEAD request on *anything* I'm puttting in my mouth.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    13. Re:Like this? by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      I always had the impression that the equivalent of metrosexuals in the I.T. world used Opera, real men used a text based browser, if a browser at all, and the rest of us normal adjusted folk used mozilla :)

    14. Re:Like this? by jpickett · · Score: 1

      Ummm, no. Well, there's no inherit reason it should or should not work really. I'm a bit confused by your post/point. www and download point to different hosts (not sure if you did an nslookup on those?). There are lots of possibilities, but the most simple would be that requests to download that don't contain the proper vars (like product, os, lang) get redirected to the main mozilla site). I mean, that not incredibly difficult to do and it would appear that just doing to download is the same as going to www.

      Honestly I'm not sure if I'm preaching to the choir with you or not because your post was so confusing for me :-) Sorry!

    15. Re:Like this? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Cat5? Bah! *Real* men use broadband-over-power-line the way you describe!

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    16. Re:Like this? by truedfx · · Score: 1

      goto may not be exclusive to DOS, but could you please name any other language in which the syntax for labels and for goto is like that? Someone mentioned csh, but doesn't the colon go after the label in that?

  6. Don't rest on your laurels by Various+Assortments · · Score: 1

    The best things keep on getting better.

    1. Re:Don't rest on your laurels by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      Hmm...I do seem to remember something about Michael Jackson being the best in pop at one time.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  7. quick.. someone pull this off by peculiarmethod · · Score: 5, Funny

    All you need to do is hack paris hiltons new blackberry, put in a folder called pics, include firefox.exe in it.. release details on slashdot as a troll. BAM. 2 billion installs.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:quick.. someone pull this off by somedude8889 · · Score: 1

      hack the windows update server and make it send firefox as an update to every windows user... I think you'll win :)

  8. Does it have to be legal and ethical? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of torn between spamming Microsoft's internal network and the historically accurate, Texan outlaw approach (download or say yer prayers!)

  9. flaming foxes by weopenlatest · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just dipped a few dozen foxes in lighter fluid and set them scurrying around the park aflame, but those damn firefox people just called me a sick bastard.

    1. Re:flaming foxes by rkmath · · Score: 1

      Of course people don't like it. Why did you set fire to *foxes* ? A firefox is not a fox. It is the Himalayan Red Panda or the Lesser Panda (Ailureus fulgens). Catch one of THOSE and do your stunt :)

    2. Re:flaming foxes by naylor83 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I bet the chinese authoroties would like that.

  10. Re:Did they calculate the 49.000.000 by demondawn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Joking aside, is this just 1.0+ downloads, or all downloads ever?

  11. Re:Did they calculate the 49.000.000 by bluephone · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just 1.0+ downloads.

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  12. Over on... by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...RubyForge it's mostly Mozilla/Firefox too:
    gforge=> select browser, count(browser) from activity_log group by browser;
    browser | count
    ---------+--------
    OPERA | 240
    OTHER | 167539
    MOZILLA | 251311
    IE | 73724
    1. Re:Over on... by GebsBeard · · Score: 1

      Running that same query on the website of Seventeen magazine or General Motors would give you a far more accurate picture of Firefox's real uptake.

  13. Weird... by EdZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone find it odd that the spreadfirefox image galleries don't display properly in firefox (e.g. http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=image/tid/42). Maybe 1600x1200 is just too much for the page? Who knows?

    1. Re:Weird... by factoryjoe · · Score: 1, Troll

      Well, blame sloppy code from Drupal that made it extremely hard for me to theme. There was an attempt made at improving the galleries but I couldn't find coders to help me implement the solution. Yay open source!

    2. Re:Weird... by drseuss9311 · · Score: 1

      what's cool about firefox though is that i can go to the link that the parent provided and hold down CTRL and scroll my mouse wheel a tad to get the page at it's best.... if only i had a bigger monitor like those graphics design geeks!!!

      --
      ------ no thanks... I've quit
    3. Re:Weird... by Tristor · · Score: 1

      Heh, I never saw this mentioned in IRC, or I would have helped out. All it needs is some quick hackage on the CSS, as far as I can tell.

      --
      "I just karma whore to everyone." -garcia (6573)
    4. Re:Weird... by l3ert · · Score: 1

      I think it's because of the following text links:

      http://www.jacquii186.home.comcast.net to promote Firefox!

      and

      http://cgi.ebay.ch/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item= 5184143263

      that makes the second column of the table overflow. Page 2 displays correctly.

      --
      per dolorem ad astra
    5. Re:Weird... by factoryjoe · · Score: 1

      Well, this happened very early on when I was still actively working on the theme. I had Josh Jarmin step up and do a great job on the CSS but then I couldn't find anyone to work on the Drupal Image Gallery module.

      I am working on rewriting the Spread Firefox theme for CivicSpace 0.8.1, so that will hopefully address some of the problems that folks have reported about the theme.

    6. Re:Weird... by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

      Bottom of page: "Spread Firefox is built on CivicSpace and Drupal..." looks like some program doesn't output proper html?

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    7. Re:Weird... by Tristor · · Score: 1

      Well, if you need any help, you know where to find me. I am not the best in the world at design, but I know my markup!

      --
      "I just karma whore to everyone." -garcia (6573)
  14. 20/20 by kars · · Score: 1

    your most amazing spectacles

    Sorry, I just got contacts.

    --
    Take life easy: one bit at a time.
  15. I got it! by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

    I will celebrate by rounding up 50,000 actual foxes and setting them all on fire!

    And to really turn it in to a spectacle, I will call PITA and give them advanced warning of the event, so they can round up whoever they can find to try to stop me... and then I'll do it an hour earlier than I said I would.

    MWwaaah-hahahahaha!!!

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    1. Re:I got it! by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean PETA, but I'm sure a lot of people consider the a PITA. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:I got it! by TheIndefiniteArticle · · Score: 2, Funny

      imagine Eating a member of PiTA

    3. Re:I got it! by Golias · · Score: 1

      I was a factor of 10^3 short on the number of foxes, too... but when "Inspirado" strikes, you don't waste time sweating the details.

      (Besides, are there even 50,000,000 foxes in the world? Not counting the cast of "Vegas"?)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:I got it! by Ian+Action · · Score: 1

      Mock the Pacific Islands Telecommunications Association will you?
      You'll never get away with this!!!

      --
      Why am I not rapping? I am rapping with you in a way.
    5. Re:I got it! by Xeo+024 · · Score: 5, Funny

      BREAKING NEWS

      FOXES SET ON FIRE

      Man sets entire population of foxes on fire in the woods of California, as he was arrested and taken away by the authorities, he was heard saying "spreadfirefox.com fools, now where's my prize?" The deluded man was promptly beaten with a night stick several times, as he made his way to his new home, the state penitentiary, according to several eye witness reports. PITA arrived on scene, and was outraged by the incident, declaring war on the man. The United States government quickly rose the terror alert level to red, and President Bush later commented "The quick brown fox jumped over the.. uh... damn I forgot it again" confusing the press, and consequently creating havoc on TV stations world wide.

      Details developing.

    6. Re:I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought it was
      People with NO concept of thE food Chain

      Oh...TA

    7. Re:I got it! by tehshen · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be nitpicking, but it's jumps, not jumped. Actually, it's more leaped, because some mean sod set all the foxes on fire, but that doesn't add any new letters.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    8. Re:I got it! by Callitrax · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is PETA which stands for People for Ethical Treatment of Animals.

      And here I thought it was People Eating Tasty Animals

    9. Re:I got it! by mobilebuddha · · Score: 1

      there goes the plot for the 5th season of 24.

    10. Re:I got it! by Council · · Score: 1

      60 seconds with photoshop

      No actually foxes were harmed in the making of this picture. Well, less than two.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    11. Re:I got it! by 4r0g · · Score: 1

      Hey, that might be a good way to meet chicks but somehow I still have doubts about them wanting to have sex with you ;)

      --
      - 4r0g
    12. Re:I got it! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If the gods didnt want us to eat animals, they wouldn't have made them out of meat!

    13. Re:I got it! by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Maybe he meant People for the Inhumane Treatment of Animals?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  16. Not wanting to be pessimist... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    but, I alone, have been responsible for at least 20 different downloads? Why? I don't carry around my USB stick all the time and when I want to install it somewhere, I just re-download it. Also this can't be the downloads of a single release: it's the total downloads since version 1.0? If yes, how about the people that redownloaded just because a new version came out?

    Of course, often a download my indicate more than one install: at my parents, I downloaded the program once and installed it on all machines (4 in total)

    So, we cannot say much from download numbers about the spread of the program. We still have the risk that we geeks/nerds download it for people and those people stick to IE. Case in point: I'm a teacher and all my pupils use IE. Even though, I always tell them to use Firefox. Why? Don't ask me... I'm only doing this job since january.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by bluephone · · Score: 1

      That's why they're honest about it being downloads, and not users. Certainly there are duplicates.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    2. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by nukem996 · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing, I dl it all the time and then install it on that computer. Last weekend I installed it on 3 hotel computers while I was away. I do run my own buiness and I have firefox on a CD which I have installed on hundreds of computers. Anyone know if the downloads count Linux bins and/or source?

    3. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by oboylet · · Score: 2, Informative
      I can't find the link right away, but Asa Dotzler has said on his weblog that no, 1.0.x downloads do not count towards the 50 million. Queue up another several tens of millions if that were the case.

      Also, the numbers could just as well be skewed in the opposite direction, since some people might only have 'switched' when their distribution was updated. Perhaps a small number for sure, but definitely a realistic possiblity.

    4. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by sp5 · · Score: 1
      Also this can't be the downloads of a single release: it's the total downloads since version 1.0? If yes, how about the people that redownloaded just because a new version came out?

      What's interesting is that even if you update using the little up arrow when updates are available, it still downloads the entire installer and puts it on the desktop (at least in Windows). ... convenient if you need to install elsewhere but still unexpected.

      I would have expected it to do the upgrade in place, but then I guess it's easier to install on top of the existing one. Unfortunately, this is one of the reasons why corporate use of Firefox is low thus far. Well, that and the fact that some web apps ONLY work with IE.

      -sp-

    5. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by tehshen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but while there are people like you who download it many times, there are other people who download it once and deploy it many times, or use a package manager to install it. 50 000 000 is a pretty big number, so everything pans out eventually.

      Usage is the best metric of Firefox's success; however, you can't measure it, as different sites have different hit rates, no doubt many have already been mentioned. Downloads is the best count we have because it's actually measurable.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    6. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about people like me who download it once, burn it on a CD, and install it on a bunch of computers.

    7. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      I'm only doing this job since january.

      This is the teacher?

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    8. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by appleprophet · · Score: 1

      "50 000 000 is a pretty big number, so everything pans out eventually."

      Actually, in a "pretty big number" the discrepency should be even greater unless you're assuming that people mass deploy firefox at the exact same rate that people download new builds of firefox from the website.

    9. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by DamnYouIAmALion · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to see what the number of firefox update checks per day is (by firefox itself). I think that's probably your most acurate indication of usage outside of general web logs. Especially as firefox does an update check every time you load the browser (I presume, perhaps once per day or something.. anyone know?)

      Obviously it's not ideal, but would be far more interesting than this 50 million thing.

    10. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Or, in other words, the number is pointless.

      I downloaded ("deployed") Firefox on at least 20 systems and all but one (my notebook) were test machines.

    11. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by LastNickAvailable · · Score: 1

      You're right but I guess that most installs on linux distros are made from some repository and not directly from their servers so that would compensate.

    12. Re:Not wanting to be pessimist... by mclipsco · · Score: 1

      Of course, often a download my indicate more than one install: at my parents, I downloaded the program once and installed it on all machines (4 in total) upstairs installs do not count! GEH!

      --
      Take off every 'SIG'!!
  17. Re:Did they calculate the 49.000.000 by bluephone · · Score: 1

    That's a screenshot of Firefox with the RSS watcher looking at the download counter (mentioned in the article). Asa just happened to have perfect timing, to catch it, unless he was just watching it all day. :)

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  18. How about 2^26? by Eunuch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Binary milestones are for nerds. They are what matters.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:How about 2^26? by mikey13 · · Score: 1

      If you had to Google for 2^26, does that make you more of a nerd, or less of a nerd?

  19. No contest... by killa62 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously... Zonk won because he posted this on slashdot...

    1. Re:No contest... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      No, Zonk will win when he posts it again in 30 minutes time...

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  20. Hmmm... by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suspect that a few of the responses to this campaign will have the hapless promoters throwing their hands in front of their eyes, whimpering, "I really didn't need to see that..."

  21. Thanks for the /.ing by scovetta · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can now download Firefox at a blazing 6.7kbps.

    And it looks like every /.er is downloading Firefox just to make the counter go up.

    As if this wasn't expected.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    1. Re:Thanks for the /.ing by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

      I can now download Firefox at a blazing 6.7kbps.

      Well, I really doubt you mean kilobits per second (download meters usually measure in kB/s -- kilobytes per second). 6.7kbps would be reeeally slow.

      Meanwhile, lots of people in the world reading your post at 56kbps can only wish they could download software at 6.7kB/s...

    2. Re:Thanks for the /.ing by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      If you really want to be anal about units, technically he's probably downloading at 6.7 KibiBytes per second (KiB).

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  22. The Opera CEO challenge... by Rahga · · Score: 1

    The Opera CEO announced he would swim from England to the USA for a mere fraction of firefox downloads.

    Accordingly, perhaps Firefox users could tell Microsoft to take a hive dive into a shallow pool.

    1. Re:The Opera CEO challenge... by anonymous_ole · · Score: 1

      Well that was 1M in 4 days... not in a year++

  23. Re:Counter by uberdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    I opened up two copies of the spreadfirefox counter page, and the counts differed. That is odd.

  24. Needs to be 50 times better than that! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Need to fly around the world naked by flapping arms with a sparkler hanging out his butt.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Needs to be 50 times better than that! by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Hasn't Steve Ballmer already done that?

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    2. Re:Needs to be 50 times better than that! by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      While yelling "Developers! Developers! Developers!"

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
  25. Re:misleading? by br0ck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But shouldn't it be 50 mil / 4 = 12.5 mil because almost all users automatically updated from 1.0.0.0 to .1, .2 and then .3?

  26. Re:Dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nope.

  27. Spectacular way to spread Firefox? by PDAllen · · Score: 2, Funny

    DL source... check
    Add a couple of bits of code from Bagle and Netsky... check
    Compiles... check

    Crack the server, upload the new release...

    Welcome to 100 million Firefoxes overnight!

  28. Re:misleading? by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

    But shouldn't it be 50 mil / 4 = 12.5 mil because almost all users automatically updated from 1.0.0.0 to .1, .2 and then .3?

    We're not counting those users who updated via our application update mechanism.

    - A

  29. Too bad that doesn't translate to users by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

    I've downloaded 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 (well also 0.3-1.0PR1 but that doesn't count in the total). I've downloaded them at work and at home and to my laptop at separate times. That translates to 12 downloads but only two users.

    Conversely, I put the Windoze installer on the server at work and everyone at work installs it from there (and it's the preferred browser of everyone at the office, even Windoze users).

    So downloads != users.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Too bad that doesn't translate to users by Copperhead · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm using Firefox from Gentoo's Portage system, which downloads the source from a set of mirros, and not from Firefox's servers, so I'm thinking all the Gentoo Firefox users aren't being counted at all.

      So, this miscount works both ways.

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
  30. Samson for the win by FeetOfStinky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even Old Testament folks were getting down with Firefox: "And Samson went and caught three hundred foxes, and took firebrands, and turned tail to tail, and put a firebrand in the midst between two tails. And when he had set the brands on fire, he let them go into the standing Corn of the Philistines, and burnt up both the shocks, and also the standing corn, with the vineyards and olives." "Then the Philistines said, Who hath done this? And they answered, Samson, the son in law of the Timnite, because he had taken his wife, and given her to his companion. And the Philistines came up, and burnt her and her father with fire." (Judges 15:1-6 KJV)

  31. Sad... by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't render properly in Firefox or Konqueror. Must be one of those IE only sites.

    1. Re:Sad... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't render properly in Firefox or Konqueror. Must be one of those IE only sites.

      I tested your hypothesis by running IE under Crossover Office which does appear to render the page correctly, while Moz, Firefox, Konq, and Epiphany all show overlapping text. Very sad indeed.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    2. Re:Sad... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1
      I tested your hypothesis by running IE under Crossover Office which does appear to render the page correctly,
      Weird. I just tried it in IE on XP, and IE crashed.

      Tried it again, and while the page loaded this time, it still looked stupid. Not the same stupid as Firefox does, but a whole pile of blank space in the middle, with the center table hung way down at the bottom of the page.
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  32. Great job! by Zlib+pt · · Score: 1

    If I open the page on IE it shows the number os downloads after maybe 20 Seconds...
    If I open it in Firefox 1.0.1 the counter never starts, keeps showing "Loading..."

    1. Re:Great job! by xsspd2004 · · Score: 1

      Works fine for me in 1.0.3 on PC Linux. It looks like a Java app. Maybe reinstall your JVM. java.sun.com

      --
      This is not an illusion, a rip-off, or a ninja technique!
  33. Goatse, anyone? by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

    Redirect all traffic from the Goatse.cx domain to SpreadFirefox.com?

  34. Now make it easier to deploy in LAN by 25albert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, now that so many home users have Firefox, and that it works really well, maybe it is time to tackle the corporate front?

    FF could be made much easier and practical for administrators to deploy.

    There is FFDeploy, but I would hope for something better and easier.

    A possibility would be to allow some .ini file as argument to the install, specifying:

    - profile location (with the possibility to leave out that stupid random directory name in the profile path),

    - a cache directory separate from the profile folder and/or the right registry entries so the cache isn't copied over the network at every logon/logoff.

    - extensions to be installed straight away,

    - etc.

    That .ini or whatever should also expand environment variables like %username%, %userprofile%, etc. (and $HOME etc. on Unix).

    If you are deploying FF on your network, have you found a way to do it without going to every machine and setting it up manually?

    1. Re:Now make it easier to deploy in LAN by starfishsystems · · Score: 2, Interesting
      OK, now that so many home users have Firefox, and that it works really well, maybe it is time to tackle the corporate front?

      A consulting group with which I'm associated just completed a half-day product integration demo for one of our clients using Firefox, as this was the specified preference of the client. Of course, this is an elightened client, which is exactly the kind we prefer.

      If you are deploying FF on your network, have you found a way to do it without going to every machine and setting it up manually?

      One simple litmus test I have for software installation in a Unix environment is to target the installation onto a shared filesystem. This directly demonstrates two kinds of relocatability:

      • the software installs correctly on the server, for example in /export/share/software, and
      • the software runs correctly on the client, for example in /mnt/share/software.

      For practical reasons, this is not always the way software will be deployed in a production environment, but it is a canonical deployment which every site should consider using to define its repository of installed software. If installation works in this case, it's safe to infer that it will also work when distributed by any other means such as cfengine.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    2. Re:Now make it easier to deploy in LAN by Plug · · Score: 1

      On Windows, you can install from the MSI file that Frontmotion package.

      The Mozilla Foundation says an MSI installer blocks the 1.1 release.

  35. Re:so what - skype got much more downloads... by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Skype doesn't face the compitition Firefox does - there's not vendor installing a similar application with every copy of the OS

  36. bluephone wins. by bannerman · · Score: 1

    game over.

    --
    I keep forgetting my place. Jesus is for losers. Why do I still play to the crowd?
  37. okay... by sellin'papes · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'll probably get trolled for this, but I think it has to be said:

    This article isn't news, and it doesn't really matter. Most /. articles fall into at least one of those categories. Its not like Firefox released a new version, or was offering new services. This article is advertisement encouraging people to visit the website and brand themselves for some 'secret prizes'.

    --
    This is my last post.
    [6th Estate]
    1. Re:okay... by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      It is somehow strange... I don't see such comments when Microsoft releases again some nice Longhorn shots (see, see, we just actually developing something!), when they are really NOT newsworth. However, when someone open source project have done right their PR and they celebrate their success - if you would say that 50 milion downloads is nothing then you must be simply ignorant - it all about - they count updates, it doesn't matter, because lot of people download twice, etc.

      What is with you people? Yes, there is such behaviour from both sides, but mostly Slashdot for the last year is plagued by Microsoft apologists. For christ sake, if you are so very confident about your Microsoft apps and it's usage, why are you come here? I have seen more trolling and zealotism from Microsoft fanboys than I ever seen it from Slashdot free software/open source guys.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  38. Re:50 million downloads by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

    i'm not sure what this is, but i would consider it a godsend if the mozilla team decided to "accidentally" break support for animated gifs, instead only showing the first frame.

    i don't need a 900K photo slideshow in gif on every message board. no thanks

  39. Re:If you need another reason to download Firefox. by Swamii · · Score: 1

    Taking a break from the typical Slashdot cynicism, I gotta say you just made my day with that one. I'm adding you to my friends list...

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  40. 50 million of 1, 1.01, 1.02, 1.03 .. right? by roror · · Score: 1

    Almost every one is notified of the availability of new minor releases, right? and those who are savy enough to install firefox are savy enough to update too. So, You can pretty much divide 50 mil by 4.

  41. Prize is mine by Danimoth · · Score: 1

    "your most amazing spectacles" Oh man, I got the sweetest pair of glasses, they got these curly things aroudn the eyes, and oh yeah, they like shoot lasers, and they have sonar. That prize is mine!

    --
    No smoking sigs indoors.
  42. Re:you're the perfect Microsoft fanboy. by Swamii · · Score: 1

    Oh dear Lord, not the religious right! Oh how eeeeevil! (as opposed to the holy & righteous secular left? Bwahaha!)

    Microsoft just donates money to whoever happens to be in power at the time (see opensecrets.org). Your original post was totally off-topic and inflammatory, and is being modded as such by secular, leftist Slashdotters like yourself. Kind of ironic.

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  43. The real reason Firefox is succeding by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

    Is that according to a friend of mine, it's just the best browser to use for porn surfing.

    *cough*

    1. Re:The real reason Firefox is succeding by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Well, providing you use the right extensions... er ...

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    2. Re:The real reason Firefox is succeding by Karl+Tacheron · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm... Flashget... DownThemAll.... (drool)

    3. Re:The real reason Firefox is succeding by b166er_zeroone · · Score: 1

      Like we didn't know that already!
      http://www.squarefree.com/pornzilla/why-firefox.ht ml

  44. Downloads All Updates? by FriedTurkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Firefox asks me to update when a new version is released but it really just downloads another version. It would be cool if they did something that just updated it self instead of just downloading a new version.

    1. Re:Downloads All Updates? by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      Appropos of this, my Firefox 1.0.3 is the fourth download (1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3), and I'm sure they count as 4 of the 50M. This is a very soft number

    2. Re:Downloads All Updates? by Pecisk · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is answer to your question:
      Slashdot comment #12352325

      No, they don't count updates from FF as downloads in spreadfirefox.com counter.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Re:When it gets more stable... by TheIndefiniteArticle · · Score: 1

    /. renders fine on the linux version of firefox and, it seems reasonble to me to assume that many people use linux while on /. I've had several problems with firefox under windows, which is why I filed bug reports and then mostly stopped using windows for internet browsing. I've never had a single problem with firefox under linux, and that could be because the windows version of firefox isn't very stable or because windows isn't very stable.

  47. Re:When it gets more stable... by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm the world's biggest fan of Microsoft. To me, Microsoft Excel is the best application ever written, and Microsoft C#/.NET is the best programming language and operating environment ever developed.

    Oh yeah, that sounds like an objective web page. How much more stable do you need? I only rarely experience problems with firefox, and those typically are attributed to crappy plugin implementations (such as Adobe's PDF Reader - which I've since stopped using, the resource hog it is).

    Further, regarding the il rendering of slashdot, maybe if the site code maintainers would update the template to something that actually validates, everything would Just Work. As of now, Slashdot doesn't even validate at HTML 3.2. It includes no character encoding information and the SGML parser on W3 comes up with 114 errors. Maybe they could follow some advice and Retool Slashdot with web standards.

  48. Re:When it gets more stable... by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

    As many others have repeatedly stated, the Slashdot rendering bug has been repaired already. Until Firefox 1.1, based on Gecko 1.8 (which contains the fix) is released, you can use the Slashfix extension, or alternately force a page reflow by changing the font size.

    As for Firefox stability in general, did you follow the installation instructions? There are some pitfalls associated with the installation process, especially if you are upgrading from a previous version. The MozillaZine Knowledge Base is a good place to start.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  49. a-la-Golden-Palace by Locarius · · Score: 2, Funny
    Do what this guy did:

    Step 1: Paint SPREADFIREFOX.com on chest

    Step 2: Wear baby-blue tutu under clothes

    Step 3: Attend Olympic sporting event

    Step 4: Remove clothes

    Step 5: Dive from Olympic diving board

    Step 6: uh... profit?

  50. My Most Amazing Spectacles by ukleafer · · Score: 1

    SpreadFirefox is offering prizes for photographic proof of your most amazing spectacles to celebrate.

    That prize is as good as mine.

  51. Fire Fox by ccharles · · Score: 1

    For the record, Fire Fox is another name for the Red Panda. Yes, they do actually exist.

  52. Re:50 million downloads by zonx+lebaam · · Score: 1
    On the other hand, did you see today's APOD? http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html

    It is a multiple frame sequence of a dust-devil on Mars, courtesy of the martian rover. Very cool, and worth the bandwidth (yes - I don't mean the local bandwidth, I mean the interplanetary transmission, for which bits are in somewhat limited supply).

  53. Flamebait! by EnsilZah · · Score: 3, Funny

    Getting a bunch of PETA members somewhere by setting a bunch of foxes on fire?

    That's just plain flamebait!

  54. takes an .ini change to fix that... by alizard · · Score: 1

    No, I don't know which one... I'll google it myself if I wind up needing it.

  55. Re:Dyslexia by TheKarateMaster · · Score: 1

    no

  56. Re:50 million downloads by mindwar · · Score: 1

    maybe other people do?

  57. What data is this conter based on? by Cinquero · · Score: 1

    How does it count all the countless downloads from unofficial mirrors? And shippings with Linux distros? Downloads through the Gentoo Linux distfiles repository?

    1. Re:What data is this conter based on? by ydrol · · Score: 1
      How does it count all the countless downloads from unofficial mirrors?

      Not too clever.

      And shippings with Linux distros?

      Not downloads.

      Downloads through the Gentoo Linux distfiles repository?

      Make than 49,000,293 then :)

  58. D/L is but one benckmark by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    Use percentage is another. Getting it bundled on built systems (Dell/HP) might be another.

    Let's let Firefox celebrate this one without worrying that it might not be the 'perfect' benchmark.

  59. Re:Or... by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

    because the flames will go out
    Set it loose in Redmond, where it will give that town some true meaning its name. =P

  60. Re:you're the perfect Microsoft fanboy. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    congratulations, you wingnuts have your own, Divinely appointed OS.

    Even if your bullshit drivel was true (which is debatable), that's still half the population of this country.

    But let me get this straight. If I use Windows, I must be a religious right-wing nut... eh?

    Jeebus, if that isn't one of the biggest leap of faith (no pun intended) generalizations I've seen from this sorry crowd, I don't know what it is.

    I suppose next you're going to accuse Windows users of killing baby seals by running them over with their SUVs. Go ahead, you want to.

  61. Re:misleading? by Chuq · · Score: 1

    Not many, probably. The only time I didn't use auto update was when I had a copy of the install sitting on another machine, and I didn't want to download it again.

    --
    - Chuq
  62. Re:obligatory by DigitalHammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    This broadcast was brought to you by Fox News.

    (Sorry, couldn't resist the pun.)

  63. I know what I'll do! by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    As we drive toward 50 million downloads, do something so cool, so unusual and so spectacular to spread Firefox that we can't help but scurry around the Mozilla Foundation to tell every one.'

    What if I put a link to mozilla.org in my Slashdot sig! Then Millions of Nerds (who have already DL'ed Firefox) will see it!

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  64. FireTalk or FireFriends extension idea by cryptoluddite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was a story a while back about flaws in Firefox and that it should integrate an instant messenger client. Kinda...

    My idea is to have a IM/IRC panel that automatically shows other Firefox users with their windows open to the same page or maybe site. Just think how cool it would be if you read some comment on Slashdot and it says the author is online; you can chat and followup a discussion without having to post lots of +0 Noise posts that nobody else really cares about anyway. Or maybe you're reading some technical article and see a few other Firefox users on the same page -- you can ask them some question specific to that page (one might be the author with the page open in firefox to answer questions, ask readers what they think of the wroiting, etc).

    If done right this could be pretty darn cool IMO. It has to be done with the browser because basically it should be a system that applies to all websites. This would also be a great social aspect to help build the Firefox community. The server load could be balanced by hashing the site or URL and thereby dividing the load on the browser end.

    1. Re:FireTalk or FireFriends extension idea by Cinquero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, writing plugins for Firefox is not too hard. You just need to set up a central server where the plugin can post your current browsing location... it will then make a lookup and display all people being online. A click should then pop up a message window from your external IM client.

      Site-related chat rooms could, of course, be implemented server-side and independent from an IM client.

      That should be pretty easy to do.

  65. Gonna get arrested by herting · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thinking I may write "firefox" on my penis to represent small and sleek, versus IE on my bloated stomache and run through the streets of London naked. That's a promotional tool thats sure to satisfy

    --
    http://www.mample.net
  66. Re:If you need another reason to download Firefox. by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

    So... getting consultation from a variety of sources is a BAD thing?

    --
    ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  67. Re:Counter by blakeross · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not quite. It is a real counter that synchronizes with the actual number every 60 seconds. In the interim, it increases by a constantly adjusting rate that's usually pretty close to correct. See http://www.infocraft.com/projects/ffcounter/

  68. Hot and Foxy Lesbian Friends by kai.chan · · Score: 1

    Hi! My hot and foxy lesbian friends and I made this arousing lesbian screensaver! Simply click on this IE/Outlook Exploi . . . link. Hope you enjoy!

  69. is this a riddle? by alizard · · Score: 1, Troll
    How many Windows in Redmond can *you* blue-screen ;)

    None, of course, they blue-screen themselves.

  70. all the patching can't hurt the stats by teknikl · · Score: 1

    the worst part of the update process is the way you have to re-download the whole works and slog through the installer again. you even have to fight the firefox homepage checkbox.

  71. political newbie? by alizard · · Score: 1
    "Political consultant" = "place to buy political influence"

    The only question Ralph Reed can answer for MS are:

    • "how do we stop Religious Right crazies from changing platforms over to Apple or Linux?"
    • "how can we trade our regular gay/lesbian/nonredneck customers for Terri Schiavo right-to-non-life crazies?"

    Would anybody in his right mind pay $240,000 for the answers to those questions? Even if Reed threw in the answer to "How can I spread bubonic plague at 1 Microsoft Way?" in for free, it's still a bad deal.

    Consider it a delayed payoff for DOJ transforming it's victory in DOJ v MS into a loss. Reed delivered, now it's MS's turn.

  72. Firefox Update? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Including repeated downloads of 1.01, 1.02, and 1.03 through the update mechanism, I'm assuming, right?

    1. Re:Firefox Update? by bluephone · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. Just straight DLs, not the Update feature. So my downloads of 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 weren't counted, just my FTP of 1.0.1, for example.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  73. Unlike the Xbox... by tepples · · Score: 1

    > > How many Windows in Redmond can *you* blue-screen ;)

    > None, of course, they blue-screen themselves.

    Nintendo does not blue-screen. Flashing gray and black, on the other hand...

  74. Bash Scripting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Real men use while loops and pipe wget to /dev/null

  75. OT: hello by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    I was just skimming, saw your nick, and thought "I'll bet that has something to do with Ruby!"

    --MarkusQ

    1. Re:OT: hello by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      Hi MarkusQ -
      Right on! Hey, looks like you're doing a lot on the ROR wiki; good times!

    2. Re:OT: hello by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

      Yep. Instead of writing in-house documentation that only we would read, we decided to spend our budgeted documentation hours on WikiWork. My write-up is lagging behind the implementation (as always) but I'm trying to keep up with both.

      'fraid I haven't been keeping up with either of the ruby lists though, or half a dozen other interesting things for that matter.

      *sigh/laugh* Now I feel guilty for reading /.

      --MarkusQ

    3. Re:OT: hello by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > we decided to spend our budgeted
      > documentation hours on WikiWork

      Very, very cool. I'm working on a Ruby extension on work hours too; it's pretty cool to be able to do so.

      > Now I feel guilty for reading /.

      Bill it as "networking" :-)

    4. Re:OT: hello by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

      I'm working on a Ruby extension on work hours too;

      Nice! I can already think of several interesting uses for something like that!

      --MarkusQ

  76. Yeah...but... by GoldMace · · Score: 1

    Firefox users tend to download new versions of their browser more than users of other browsers...I suspect...

  77. Some statistics from my site: by tektek · · Score: 1

    Average unique visitors per day: 5455 (users range from video game players to video game modders) Internet Explorer 6.0 - 66.3 % Firefox - 24.8 % Internet Explorer 5.5 oder älter - 2.19 % Safari - 1.64 % Gecko - 1.42 % Netscape - 1.07 % Opera - 0.77 % Mozilla - 0.27 % (entries less than .27 removed)

    1. Re:Some statistics from my site: by tektek · · Score: 1

      Damn formatting~

      Average unique visitors per day: 5455 (users range from video game players to video game modders)

      Internet Explorer 6.0 - 66.3 %
      Firefox - 24.8 %
      Internet Explorer 5.5 oder älter - 2.19 %
      Safari - 1.64 %
      Gecko - 1.42 %
      Netscape - 1.07 %
      Opera - 0.77 %
      Mozilla - 0.27 %
      (entries less than .27 removed)

  78. firefox-tan by ianmorris · · Score: 1

    someone (preferably female0 could cos-play as firefox-tan http://images.google.com/images?q=firefox-tan&hl=e n&lr=&sa=N&tab=wi

    --
    i am the self-proclaimed king of free stuff

  79. Just like 7-Up by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Sort of like show us your can!

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  80. Amazing Spectacles by ReadParse · · Score: 1

    Amazing spectacles like these?

  81. Instability by dcam · · Score: 1

    I have noticed a marked increase in instability with the 1.0.3 release. I have sent in bug reports of a particular news website crashing firefox consistently (stuff.co.nz, try http://go.fark.com/cgi/fark/go.pl?IDLink=1458241&l ocation=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stuff.co.nz%2Fstuff%2F0%2 C2106%2C3258588a10895%2C00.html), and in the web application I work on, I also get relatively frequent crashes.

    In the case of the web application I work on, this is pure W3c compliant code. It does not appear to be terribly consistent, but it seems to happend while a number of frames are loading, then clicking another link that will change to load a different frameset.

    It is possible that this is happening as a result of the extensions I have installed or the custom stylesheet I sue to limit ads. I haven't yet had a chance to test against a vanilla install of firefox.

    Anyway it is an unwelcome surprise to have firefox crash on me regularly.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Instability by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Do try without extensions, and see if it still crashes. I guess extensions really shouldn't be able to crash Firefox (or Seamonkey), but my own experience has shown that they do, so maybe they're the problem in your case, too.

      Just do a binary search until you find the offending extension and then throw it out. :)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:Instability by rreptile · · Score: 1

      I installed FF1.03 (clean install) yesterday and have zero extensions. Twice now, suddenly and inexplicably, FF has frozen up entirely just after doing onsite searches using ctrl+F. (I think this is what caused it) I usually have several tabs open at once.

      The only change I have made was in about:config I made the default background colour #dddddd (which I know does not fit in the "216 safe" colours but shouldn't matter if my computer can see it, should it??)

      This new version of FF is quite slow to load as well. I had FF0.8 until this January and loved it. Foolishly, I upgraded to 1.0 with what seemed to be an incompatible webdeveloper extension and had major crashing of FF and the computer that resulted in corrupted files, etc. etc. Not that it was necessarily FF that caused the corruption but it was a bit coincidental. I had to dump it. Of course, FF0.8 was gone as well. The computer pretty much stabilized.

      Of course, I check daily for viruses with a daily updated AVG and also do frequent searches for spyware.

      I've only now, because of the recent security warnings with NS7, decided to return to FF and am pretty much at my wit's end. I really really don't want to move over to IE6!

      I am currently using NS7.1 with javascript and java disabled. (not really ideal situation)

      Please excuse the verbosity....

  82. pictures by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 1

    Some pictures of (fire)foxy girls will probably be in the top 10.

  83. Prizes for amazing spectacles by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 1
    SpreadFirefox is offering prizes for photographic proof of your most amazing spectacles to celebrate.
    Hey! It's a good job Elton John doesn't read slashdot!
  84. Re:misleading? by Chuq · · Score: 1

    No.

    "Not many" was my answer to "How many people are like me [..] had to use IE to get the update?"

    "The only time I didn't use auto update was when I had a copy of the install sitting on another machine, and I didn't want to download it again." - by this I meant that auto update has always worked for me when I wanted to use it - which was several times (many different machines) over the past few weeks - indicating that it is not a problem effecting everyone and is likely a problem specific to the original poster.

    The only time I didn't use auto-update, was when I didn't attempt it to start with (ie. the new version was already downloaded).

    --
    - Chuq
  85. Accidentally Posted Before Right Time. by TeHCrAzY · · Score: 1

    Congratulations! Firefox 50 Million Commemorative Coins At 5:47 AM PST this morning, we rolled over the 50,000,000 line. Thanks to the hundreds of you who have regaled us with your heartwarming and often hilarious tales of spreading Firefox. We're featuring some of the best in the right column, and those members are taking home one of 50 limited edition coins celebrating this milestone, along with other goodies. Even the coins themselves were designed by one of our most talented volunteers, graphics designer Jamey Boj. Along with coin #1 in the series, we are also awarding a very special prize--the biggest we've ever given out--to the lucky SpreadFirefox affiliate who delivered the golden click that went with the 50 millionth download. We have identified this person and will withhold her information until she accepts the prize. Check back early next week! In the mean time, we've got 39 more coins to give away, as well as some signed gear. Keep those great spreading stories coming to fifty@spreadfirefox.com.

    --
    Monkeys. In my pants.
  86. Re:if you don't like it here... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    Oh man, thankfully this was still active and in my recent post list. Do we feel mighty stupid this fine afternoon, or what?

    Bwahahahaha.