Slashdot Mirror


Plugin For Winamp Allows Downloading From iPod

slicenglide writes "A newly released plugin for Winamp allows you to copy music from your iPod to your computer. Wired has picked up the story and includes a link to the WinAmp plugin page where you can grab yourself a copy. "

398 comments

  1. Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think my grandparents use to use that back in the early twentieth century...

    1. Re:Winamp? by springbox · · Score: 1

      Well, if Winamp is no good then what would you suggest that we use instead? Winamp is still my favorite media player and I love using Shoutcast. It's light weight, flexible, and widely supported. What's not to like about it? Any ideas for us Windows users? (Please don't say WMP or Real Player, ick.)

    2. Re:Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lesser, simpler, smaller = foobar2000 alsmost as winamp2 ;)

    3. Re:Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't used Winamp in a couple of years. I just couldn't deal with a program that was supposed to play music, but took up 75 - 90% of my cpu.

      Is is still the resource hog it used to be? Is it still bloated?

    4. Re:Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not try Quintessential Player? Much lighter in weight than Winamp, has plugins, has skins, and will play Shoutcast. http://www.quinnware.com/

      I gave up on Winamp long, long ago.

    5. Re:Winamp? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Use amaroK. I'm really liking it.

    6. Re:Winamp? by WaterBreath · · Score: 1
      You must have missed this part:

      Any ideas for us Windows users?

      I doubt he's willing to convert to Linux just to use a different media player.

    7. Re:Winamp? by Bilzmoude · · Score: 1

      I'll probably get flamed for this, but I have not found any music player for Windows better than iTunes. I have about 60 GB of music, and have found that all other players are slow and clunky when indexing my library. iTunes is fast, easy and has a great LAN sharing method that works really well. B

    8. Re:Winamp? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      At least it remembers where in a playlist I was the next time I turn on my computer, unlike iTunes. I make static playlists because I want rated songs to play more often based on how high they're rated. Friggin iTunes Smart Playlists aren't smart enough to do that.

    9. Re:Winamp? by springbox · · Score: 1

      I would use Linux if it wasn't for my precious time wasters (games) :(

    10. Re:Winamp? by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

      Foobar2000 seems fairly decent.
      http://www.foobar2000.org/

      As an offside, I'm am getting so fucking annoyed by the anti-script thing.

    11. Re:Winamp? by hostyle · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try importing 1,000 tracks across a wireless (802.11b) network. iTunes takes about 10 minutes. Winamp takes all of 30 seconds. WTF is iTunes doing?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    12. Re:Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      too busy to log in, but i suspect you have this option turned on in itunes.

      "copy files to itunes music folder when adding to library"

      that will slow things down considerably. just a thought.

      -r

    13. Re:Winamp? by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      iTunes sucking is the reason why this plugin is getting all the attention that it is getting.

    14. Re:Winamp? by jxs2151 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You from Korea by any chance?

    15. Re:Winamp? by kjj · · Score: 1

      I prefer XMPlay. It is very small and fast. It also has great quality playback. Works with OGG and PLS and plays streams well and is very stable. My only minor complaint is that the default theme doesn't look that good but that was easily fixed.

    16. Re:Winamp? by oc255 · · Score: 1

      iTunes is copying it to your library folder. If you disabled your WiFi, or walked away from it, winamp wouldn't play your library but iTunes would.

      I guess it's annoying but it buys you a real library, not just a playlist.

    17. Re:Winamp? by oc255 · · Score: 1

      At least it's possible. Apple allows you to rip as MP3. Sony's products encrypt/protect your songs on the portable device in such a way that you'd never be able to get them off.

      On your iPod, the songs are there, they're just in a vast confusing hierarchy of folders. This plugin (and other projects like it), simply the process of going iPod -> Computer.

      You can always go Computer -> iPod because they figure you already have the MP3 file (legal or not). But you can't go Computer -> iPod -> Computer, not with iTunes and probably not with any corporate software.

      I think "sucking" is a bit of a simplification. I think it's more "business decision'ing". :)

    18. Re:Winamp? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I never liked Winamp because it does not support Unicode and because it does not support multi-user setups. They claim that because only a very small fraction of their users need anything beyond chr(255), they won't implement it. In fact, one mod at Winamp referred me to Foobar2000 for my Unicode-needs. I haven't looked back since.

    19. Re:Winamp? by reub2000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But amaroK is that good that it's worth it to switch to linux.

    20. Re:Winamp? by TigerTime · · Score: 1

      No it's not a hog. My guess is you tried version 3 and wound up switching to some other app. Version 3 was a colosal failure. They immediately began work on Version 5 (v2 speed + v3 technology). It is much much better.

      It has Internet Radio and Internet TV built in so you don't have to go to shoutcasts website to load a stream in. It's all built in to the app.

      I have a 1.7Ghz machine and it's currently streaming a 128kbps stream of shoutcast and my processor goes anywhere from 0-7% usage. of course even with Winamp closed it uses the same. So it's basically negligible.

      Personally, if I'm just playing a bunch of music and doing other stuff, I'll use Winamp 2, but if I'm wanting to REALLY use it, i'll use Winamp 5. I don't want a media player that takes up 800*600. I want a media player that sits in the title bar of my screen and is always on top. And that's what Winamp does so well.

    21. Re:Winamp? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but no good because iTunes doesn't tell me how much more often 5-stars plays compared to 3-stars. Do you know? It also won't let me adjust the formula so 5-stars plays twice as often as 3, and six times as often as one-stars. Why am I limited to 5 stars anyway? Because most people don't need more? I'd like ten stars so I can have a larger range of how often the better songs play.

    22. Re:WinAmp? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      I use winamp, it lets me play midi and .mod files. Don't need to download third party plugins, they come built in.

    23. Re:Winamp? by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Nope. Thats definitely turned off - wouldn;t have been space to store them all on teh laptop in question. I may have exaggerated when I said "ten minutes", but iTunes was certainly many orders of magnitude slower.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    24. Re:Winamp? by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

      I may have exaggerated when I said "ten minutes"
      ...
      many orders of magnitude slower.

      If by 'many' you mean 'more than two', that's an amusing way to correct your exaggeration...

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    25. Re:Winamp? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Winamp has a great video player. It's nothing more than another front end for DirectX, but it has great dual head support, and all the goodness of Winamp's playlist support. Not to mention things like global hotkeys and visualizations. Nothing like one monitor playing music videos full screen and the other doing Milkdrop full screen.

      Though, it does appear that Nullsoft broke the video player in Winamp 5.09 pretty good. Thus, I'm sticking to 5.08 for the time.

    26. Re:Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sony's products encrypt/protect your songs on the portable device in such a way that you'd never be able to get them off.

      This used to be the case, but is not so any more.

      They have seen the error of their ways. Their stupid DRM and its misguided implementation was the product of their internal conflicts of interest.

      Sony has since realized that consumers won't deal with this bullshit, and that to remain competitive they had to market music players without their DRM .

    27. Re:Winamp? by knigitz · · Score: 0

      They most likely referred you to foobar2000 so you would stop complaining and filling their forums up with crap. They hoped you would never look back. You fell right into their plans!

    28. Re:Winamp? by ryusen · · Score: 1

      iTunes for Windows doesn't support OGG. That automatically disqualified it, because i was ripping my CDs in OGG for a while. I do like the interface, but i wish it also had a minimalist interface that was as small as soem of the winamp skins.

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    29. Re:Winamp? by Bob+MacSlack · · Score: 1

      I used iTunes for over a year and recently switched back to winamp to try and decide which is really the better for me. One thing I noticed is, like you said, adding lots of files to your iTunes library can take a long time. When I reinstalled everything recently, I found I had to add my music (over 20gb) in chunks to keep iTunes from locking up. Move in a couple gigs, and it takes a couple minutes, move in 20 and it takes, well I never waited to see, after about 5 minutes of it being unresponsive I killed it.

      Winamp had no problem with getting the whole collection at once, although it is noticeably slower in moving through the library. And it has nice search features.

      I await the day one or the other merges the nice things of both. Media utopia.

    30. Re:Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may not have been a whole two years because the version I have (that I don't use) is version 5. I do remember that when 5 came out, it was supposed to be much better than 3. It was, but on my machine (WinXP, 2 Ghz, 640 MB ram) it was still a bloated hog. Maybe the latest version is improved?

      I use Quintessential Player and listen to Shoutcast. I like that, with FoxyTunes, I can control the music through FireFox and not take a big cpu usage hit.

    31. Re:WinAmp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i use winamp. it has a lot of good features. 5.x is awesome.
      i am surprised by this article b/c ml_ipod has been out for over a year.
      a great alternative to ipods are irivers

    32. Re:Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install VMWare for Windows and have the best of both worlds

  2. Wow, news to me by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I for one never realised that iPods wouldn't let you copy music *off* them. Thank god I never bought one, that would annoy the hell out of me.

    1. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's nice to see dumb people self filtering themselves out of the iPod user base.

    2. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I for one never realised that iPods wouldn't let you copy music *off* them."

      You are now confusing terms iPod and iTunes.

    3. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course they allow you to copy music off of them. They're just plain old firewire/USB hard drives as far as your computer is concerned.

      The only gotchas are that the files are hidden, and the music's filenames are hashed for fast access from a metadata database. Thus when you copy the files back, you have to regenerate their names from their ID3 tags or the metadata database, as this winamp plugin does. You can do this as simply as dragging your music back into iTunes with the 'copy imported music' setting on, and there are plenty of other utilities that do it that have never gotten a /. article.

    4. Re:Wow, news to me by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 4, Informative

      Meh, I wouldn't say I was dumb, I just never investigated iPods in enough depth to discover that you can't take music off the thing. I wonder how many people know about that when they get one, it probably surprises a few people.

    5. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are now confusing terms iPod and iTunes.

      I don't think he is. I'm sure you can copy music off of iTunes, that's the whole point of iTunes. From the Slashdot summary it sounds as though you can't normally copy music off of your iPod. I doubt that many people would expect that.

    6. Re:Wow, news to me by OwP_Fabricated · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's nice to see that assholes aren't however.

    7. Re:Wow, news to me by Jarlsberg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you. If I had bought an Ipod, I would have assumed you could copy tracks back and forth, just like you can with any other MP3 player (that I've used, anyway). I don't really *get* the whole Ipod thing (why all the fuzz over a simple music player?), so I never bothered to buy one.

    8. Re:Wow, news to me by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ipods are definitely for Lusers (it surprises me that so many slashdotters rave about them). I don't have a HD based mp3 player yet but there are ones out there that are much more geek friendly than the apple offering. When I do buy one (when the prices fall a bit) I will definitely try and make sure I get one that plays ogg vorbis (this is one of the tests for geekiness).

      To be fair to the Ipod its just DRM'ed music you can't transfer off it, files and such can go both ways AFAIK although you do need the apple software installed. Not like my flash based muvo nx, any relatively recent operating system will see it as a removable hard drive, yes its a lot smaller than a HD based mp3 player but even so it amazes me how useful it can be.

      Nothing wrong Ipod/Itunes, very user friendly which isn't a bad thing, but I don't want to lock myself into such a service, I have a feeling that eventually downloadable music (the legal stuff) will converge into one simple DRM format that all the stores use.

    9. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article seems to use the name iTunes to mean the software, not the service. So if that's right then it is iTunes that prevents you from copying music off of the iPod.

    10. Re:Wow, news to me by DenDave · · Score: 0

      *triumph the insulting comic dog*

      eets a great plugeen for weeenamp, for me to poop in!

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    11. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't really *get* the whole Ipod thing (why all the fuzz over a simple music player?)

      Because ITS MAED BY TEH APPAL!!!!1!one! Obviously anything that ITS MAED BY TEH APPAL!11one!!three! has to be the only thing in the entire world you should ever own. Even if it is overpriced, DRM crippled, uses a non-standard patent-encumbered format, requires software that only works on MacOS or Windows and is one big cross-promotional tie-in to an online music store that over-charges. It's ITS MAED BY TEH APPAL111oneone!!?seven! and that's all you need to know.

    12. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ipods are definitely for Lusers (it surprises me that so many slashdotters rave about them).

      It does? Slashdot is 95% fuckwit. The other 5% of us just post AC and/or troll the fuckwits in between doing something useful.

    13. Re:Wow, news to me by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That's why I got a Sampod.

      It supports open, industry standards like OGG Vorbis. Also, the "DRM" is used by a wide number of vendors, giving me the choice of at least 8 on-line music stores to purchase or "lease" music from.

      I simply plugged it into my Windows XP laptop and it worked--no software to install. Just press the "sync" button from Windows Media player 10.

      Copying music off is as easy as copying music on.

    14. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You don't have a HD based mp3 player, and when you do get one, it'll run Apache and have a browser.

    15. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      With apple fans, life is good.

      You are automatically associated with intelligent people since all apple product users are clever and everyone else dumb.

      iPods have only features, other players have only drawbacks.

      etc.
      etc.

      Dear AC, imagine what you'd be saying if other players required to get 3rd party software to copy music from the player to the computer.

    16. Re:Wow, news to me by newend · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am also surprised. Especially since the first time I tried to copy music off a friend's iPod onto my computer it worked. The only problem I noticed was that it truncated file names (a bitch and a half to go back and fix).

    17. Re:Wow, news to me by DigitumDei · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I compare you to a nazi bigot can I then call godwin and get all the zealots to shut up?

    18. Re:Wow, news to me by newend · · Score: 1

      I hope you realize that you can still illegally d/l mp3s off the Intar-web and put them on an iPod. I really enjoy my iPod because it's easy to navigate through the songs (The rate sensative wheel helps), and it's fairly simple. There are some things that I would tweek, but when you have an interface that's 5 buttons and a wheel you have to make compromises.

    19. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, somebody hasn't done ANY research on this topic at all have they?
      The only real format that the ipod doesn't support is WMA, I don't count ogg as a real format because so few people use it, except for their own personal music. I'm not aware of any sites other than allofmp3.com that allows user to purchase music in ogg format....

      My ipod has nothing but mp3's that I've ripped myself, podcasts, and a few aac files I've purchased from allofmp3.com.
      I don't need to use iTunes to do it either! e.g. http://www.ephpod.com/ and numerous other ipod software.

      Any recent operating system, including Windows 2000, XP, Linux and OS X will see the ipod as a normal USB storage device without any additional drivers loaded..... sheesh.... do some homework before making such idiotic comments.

    20. Re:Wow, news to me by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      The only real format that the ipod doesn't support is WMA, I don't count ogg as a real format because so few people use it, except for their own personal music. I'm not aware of any sites other than allofmp3.com that allows user to purchase music in ogg format....

      Yeah ?, well I do count ogg vorbis which is why I won't be buying an Ipod unless they start supporting it.

    21. Re:Wow, news to me by PhilHibbs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It supports open, industry standards like OGG Vorbis.


      As much as I support OGG Vorbis, and have nearly all my music on my iRiver, I think calling it "industry standard" is way off the mark. MP3 is by far the most widely supported format, and therefore closest to being a de facto standard. The only other competitor is WAV.
    22. Re:Wow, news to me by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Thats because its bullsjit.

      My iPod is filled with my own ripped MP3's, and copy fine back and forth using iTunes (the program)

      What is disallowed, and is now possible due to this plugin, is iTunes (the store) downloaded AAC music onto your iPod WHICH HAS DRM, was disallowed off.

      Big news: DRM places restrictions on you. Winamp helps. Film at 11.

    23. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey mods, what does this have of informative?? the link just spit you a 404!

    24. Re:Wow, news to me by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, have you been living in a cave???? Haven't you seen those commercials with the cool shadows dancing in front of pretty colors? This is the best tech since Intel released the Blue Man Group.

      Ipod wasn't really meant for those who understand DRM, vendor tie-down, or patent encumbered propietary formats. Its meant for joe-six-pack. However, once it became sooooo cool, even the /. crowd had to get one. I mean when living in your mothers basement, you REALLY cannot afford to let any chance to look cool pass you by ;-)

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    25. Re:Wow, news to me by Colm+Buckley · · Score: 0, Troll
      I simply plugged it into my Windows XP laptop and it worked--no software to install. Just press the "sync" button from Windows Media player 10.
      Bill? Is that you?
    26. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Good for you...

      You are willing to give up THE industry standard for legal purchasable downloaded music for a standard that is no where near industry standard -- regardless of if its open or not -- but after bragging about how geeky you are, implying OGG Roxorz or what ever you kids say, you go on to mention it supports 8 online music stores, all of whom use nonopen, nonindustry standard (at least from the perspecitive of sales) and all of whome have less choice than what you can get via iTunes combined (of course, unless you are talking about certain illegal russian services -- but those also offer ther music in AAC as well).

      The funny thing is, I simply plug my iPod into my Mac and press sync as well...or something like that, its so easy, I don't even remember the steps.

      As for copying music off? Who the fuck needs that feature? My music player is a music player and nothing more. If I want to copy files, I put it in hard drive mode and copy them there. When I want it to listen to music, thats a different sort...who the hell is so ignorant they can't figure out that one can't easily transfer music to their computer from their walkman? Same thing.

      This is what I hate about fucking nerds...they focus on what something can't do as opposed to what it can do. The iPod is one of the best MUSIC PLAYERS out there...its not the best videoplayer or email reader or otherwise. Thats not what it is. ITS A MUSIC PLAYER FUCKERS!!!

    27. Re:Wow, news to me by DenDave · · Score: 1
      My iPod is filled with my own ripped MP3's, and copy fine back and forth using iTunes (the program)


      which version of Itunes/pod firmware?

      I have the latest Itunes (tiger) and 2.1 firmware on my 3rd gen and I cannot copy from the ipod back to Itunes within the Itunes application. You have utils like podripper that will help you but the Itunes application doesn't support this (anymore)

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    28. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just think he's an asshole cause you are one of those stupid people self filtering. I'd much rather be considered an asshole by an idiot than actually be an idiot. An idiot cannot fix their problem and everybody who meets them is aware of it. A lot of assholes can hide it quite well till you piss them off. /yes I own an ipod

    29. Re:Wow, news to me by sleeper0 · · Score: 1

      ITMS is a break even business for apple that serves only to drives sales of their portable - not the other way around. While I don't own an ipod or any other type of portable, it's silly to discount the effect of branding, industrial design and marketing that makes products breakout successes. Why do you think everyone owned a walkman in the 80's and a nokia phone in the late 90's and early 00's.

    30. Re:Wow, news to me by iainl · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) enable your iPod for hard-disc use in the options.

      2) look on the disk (on Windows they're in a hidden directory) and copy all those shiny mp3 files off to a temp directory.

      3) introduce them to iTunes and ask it to consolidate your library if you want the filenames to be sorted out.

      This certainly works on Windows, so I'd be surprised if it doesn't work on OSX as well.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    31. Re:Wow, news to me by Total_Wimp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They're just plain old firewire/USB hard drives as far as your computer is concerned...

      ...You can do this as simply as dragging your music back into iTunes with the 'copy imported music' setting on, and there are plenty of other utilities that do it that have never gotten a /. article.


      All my other firewire/USB hard drives don't require special utilities. Even my PSP lets me just plug in and drag and drop.

      Funny, I thought simplicity was supposed to be the big draw of the one-button-mouse Mac culture.

      TW

    32. Re:Wow, news to me by ztirffritz · · Score: 1

      I've never really seen a need to copy music off of my iPod. I copy the music to the iPod with iTunes. The music remains in my library on my computer as well as on my iPod. If you need to use the iPod as a hard drive to MOVE your music you can do that just fine too. Just configure it to work as a data HardDrive and copy the files to the drive. Then copy them back to where ever you want. The difference is you can't play those files on the iPod. They are just data. You could conceivably have the same song on there twice. One is playable, the other is just a bunch of 1's and 0's.

      --
      Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    33. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that price, I'd have to say it was meant for joe-case-of-fine-chardonnay.

    34. Re:Wow, news to me by Zerikai · · Score: 0, Troll

      And how is the parent insightful? We need a 'dumb' mod...

    35. Re:Wow, news to me by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Yep this would work except they are hidden files and Finder doesn't like'em... of course having a Unix underbelly means you can use tools like konqueror and mc to manipulate files.
      On this note... has someone figured out how to get fish:// urls supported on OSX(tiger)??
      alternatly, has anyone been succesful in mounting their own "idisk" server?

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    36. Re:Wow, news to me by emandres · · Score: 1

      First of all, good luck finding an mp3 player that plays ogg. And second of all, please read the seventeen comments before yours about how it IS possible to pull files off. The fact that the files are in a hidden file is only a mild deterrent (detergent?). The reason I got an iPod is because all of the other mp3 players are either trash or have a horrible UI. A friend of mine has had both an iRiver and a Creative Jukebox Zen, and the things are pieces of crap. The iRiver had a fatal software error that crashed the HD, and somehow or other the same demise came to his Zen. Plus the UI on the Zen is HORRIBLE. You have this tiny little directional button that either move a tiny bit for slow or a normal bit for really fast. You can't argue with the ipod's ui, unless of course you have no thumbs.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    37. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the music's filenames are hashed for fast access

      On mine the filenames are intact. Granted the directories they're are labelled F00, F01.., but still not very difficult to copy at all. Really don't know what the fuss is all about.

    38. Re:Wow, news to me by iainl · · Score: 1

      There's two different versions of simplicity to be balanced here, though. The simplicity of just dropping files onto the drive to put music on it, versus the simplicity of fast access to tracks via multiple smart playlists, multiple hand-built playlists, genre, artist or track.

      The latter required them to stick all the info in a database to get both performance and battery efficiency. In turn, this means forcing the user to either upload in a way that the database is kept up to date, or to go down iRiver's method of having you do that as a seperate act. Choosing iTunes was just a design decision, and a very good one in my eyes - the horrible UI was why I didn't buy an iRiver H140 instead, even though they look shinier and have a pair of optical connections.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    39. Re:Wow, news to me by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Except that the Ipod doesn't prevent it. They're all there in a hidden directory that is easy to get to with a CLI or other tools. Itunes just doesn't support it.

      --

      mbbac

    40. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      erm... I have an ipod and all I have to do is view the hidden files.

      Maybe because I don`t class the OS that itunes runs on as 3rd party..?

    41. Re:Wow, news to me by TylerL82 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought simplicity was supposed to be the big draw of the one-button-mouse Mac culture.

      Three simple steps for adding new music to your iPod:
      1: Import a CD or buy some songs in iTunes.
      2: Plug in your iPod.
      3: There's no step three.

    42. Re:Wow, news to me by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      It's all in a hidden folder. And the thing is UMS. However, the music is stored in crypticly named folders. You'll need a search tool to find your music.

    43. Re:Wow, news to me by Hell+O'World · · Score: 1
      I thought simplicity was supposed to be the big draw of the one-button-mouse Mac culture.

      Yes, it is. Having less choices is simpler. For most people, that is great. When you want to do the most obvious thing; like select something with your mouse, it is intuitive. You don't have to learn anything. Your power user, rapidly pasting their text with their trusty middle button, might feel a bit constrained by the lack of options. Likewise with the design decisions around the Ipod. Sure, they were working in an arena of draconian regulations, and they didn't want to get their asses sued, but they were able to allow users to do the most obvious thing easily. In this case, moving tunes TO the Ipod.

    44. Re:Wow, news to me by Daytona955i · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, I think iPod's intent to not allow you to download tracks from your iPod was to help their stance with the music industry. (namely RIAA) However it is really easy to find programs that will allow you to get songs off of your iPod. You can however, easily upload/download other files to your iPod without any external programs.

      Pros and cons of an iPod:
      First, an iPod has one of the best interfaces of any portable music player I've ever seen. However I think the most powerful aspect of the iPod is using it in conjunction with iTunes. Yes, it sucks that it's not available for Linux but I use a powerbook as my main personal desktop and Linux mainly for mythtv and my servers. I really love the smart playlists and the ratings that you have available to you in iTunes. I can easily create complicated filters to say include all songs that have a rating of 4 or higher but don't include any Christmas songs.

      Also while I agree that DRM sucks, you can easily burn a cd and then rip the resulting CD back into mp3s with no DRM. I've also found that the iTunes store has a decent selection of music.

      The iPod also has the ability to remember where you stopped playing audiobooks. I think this is really cool because I have a long commute and I don't have to fiddle with fast forwarding or anything.

      There are a lot of car manufacturers who now offer easy ways of attaching your iPod to your cars stereo, you can also usually use the controls on the steering wheel if your car has them.

      I will admit that the iPod also has some downsides... first if you use napster, you are out of luck. The only option I have seen to get napster songs onto your iPod is to use a program that records the output of your soundcard. This just takes forever. Personally I don't have a napster subscription but I know some people who do and I know that some colleges (like psu) have subscriptions for all their students.

      It also won't play ogg formatted songs. For me this is a biggie. While most of my songs are already in mp3 format, I have been thinking of switching to ogg for my new songs but I guess I will have to wait on that.

      I recently got a 60GB iPod photo and I think it rocks! I plan on getting one of the speaker docks to put in the nursery for our new baby and have a playlist of just children's music. I will also always have said music with me in the car and then when I go to work, I don't have to worry about having the car loaded with children's music, I just change the playlist to one of my own. My wife also has an iPod mini so she can use the speaker dock while I'm at work.

    45. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother is living in MY basement, you insensitive clod.

    46. Re:Wow, news to me by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I found a wonderful freeware app called Zortam (google for it) that will populate id3 from file name or vice versa as well as a whole bunch of other options.

    47. Re:Wow, news to me by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I agree except for one thing? what if you have a major disk failure? As you are already essentially "backing up" your music to the iPod couldn't you just use it to restore? Of course this is assuming you keep everything on it (barring you have more mp3s than will fit then you should be looking at alternative methods for backup)

    48. Re:Wow, news to me by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't get it either if I wasn't a Mac user. The fact that it syncs my address book and calendars and allows me to keep backups of important files and short text notes on it makes it more like a portable hard drive with an interface than a music player.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    49. Re:Wow, news to me by mbbac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It surprises no one because it isn't true.

      --

      mbbac

    50. Re:Wow, news to me by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 0

      "I recently got a 60GB iPod photo"

      Man... that is HUUUGGGEEE. You have a 50 MegaPixel camera or something?? Maannnn... with pictures like that you don't need wallpaper anymore !

      Sorry.. couldn't resist ;-)

    51. Re:Wow, news to me by bahamat · · Score: 1
      I for one never realised that iPods wouldn't let you copy music *off* them. Thank god I never bought one, that would annoy the hell out of me.


      That isn't exactly true. I bought an album off of iTunes exactly one day before my hard drive gave up the ghost on my iMac and I hadn't yet copied it to my iBook, but it was on my iPod. When I got my new hard drive I just opened up a shell and copied /Volumes/iPod/iPod_Control/Music to my desktop and then did a Spotlight searcy for the album name. The exact number of items came up in the results as are in the album and I dropped them all on iTunes.

      There's a huge misconception about Apple and music. The iPod and iTunes are only designed to prevent the majority of piracy. Anybody with any decent knowledge can pretty much do whatever they want. Just like the lock on your front door is meant to keep out the majority of thieves, but anybody who's an experienced locksmith can pretty much do whatever they wants. Anything beyond basic protection is up to the integrity of the person to not violate the law.
    52. Re:Wow, news to me by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      They use the cunning trick of setting the directories that contain the music to be "hidden", using whatever mechanisms the host filesystem allows for doing such a thing. With HFS+ I think they had to use a hack, with FAT they use the hidden attribute that's been present in all versions of MSDOS since, well, 2.x I believe. I know it was present on DOS3 anyway.

      ie this isn't a serious limitation, it's a "Let's do the minimum possible to avoid the music industry claiming the iPod's designed to help people illegally copy music"

      If they had been serious, chances are they'd store all the music in a big, encrypted, file, only maintainable via iTunes or something like that, or have the firmware hide the music and make sectors containing music "write only".

      I'm no longer an Apple defender, but on this issue I don't think they're being particularly evil.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    53. Re:Wow, news to me by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Three simple steps for adding new music to your iPod:
      1: Import a CD or buy some songs in iTunes.
      2: Plug in your iPod.
      3: There's no step three.


      See, that's the problem right there. You gotta have iTunes. Using Apple products really is easier if you use all the products they tell you to, when they tell you to use them. If you want to use anything else and it can quickly turn into a hassle.

      This is simplicity in exactly the same way as "just us Internet Explorer and you wont have rendering or interoperability issues." If I don't give MS a pass on their version of "simplicity", why should I say it's ok for Apple?

    54. Re:Wow, news to me by a3217055 · · Score: 1

      Ok you are right it is Appal that makes the iPod, and a lot of the basement crowd has picked it up. You want to see the popularity of the iPod go check out the East Coast where New York City is. Where I live in the NordeLand of America there ain't that much iPod ness except at work.

      I have the cheapest iPod. I don't find happiness in goods. I needed one so it works under Linux ( gtkpod). Also this was the chepeast for the most ammount of storage. Also I don't take good care of my electronics so something that I could take mountain biking and camping for 4 days with out charge.

      But the iPod has caught on but it costs close to $200 to get it to integrate with your car. I mean the cost is just so high out there. I mean for the guy who wants to put it in his babies room why doesn't he just by a Roku or one of the applicances that can access your computer's HDD using smb or nfs. The next thing apple is going to make is going to be a lil' device with a remote control that interfaces with your Mac/PC and it acts like a player for your 60GB music collection.

      Anyway we guys at Slashdot think too much about iPods and Appal gaining control and buying Ikea furniture. There are better and much more deeper stories out there that affect our society. Where's the slashdot story about censorship of the media and the curent administration and the "War"/Fighting in Iraq and why the body counts don't match up on different news papers.

    55. Re:Wow, news to me by Momoru · · Score: 1

      If you dont "get" the whole ipod thing, you probably don't "get" why people pay hundreds of dollars for a pair of sunglasses or buy ferraris. Its simply something to show off your status symbol. It in no way it technologically superior to any other mp3 player, and it also costs more. (Ok the shuffle supposedly has that rediculously good sound quality, but all that is negated by the crappy stock headphones that you must use to prove that your are a true yuppy.)

    56. Re:Wow, news to me by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I replied to the comment above yours, if it's not ok for Microsoft to lock you in then why should I consider it ok for Apple?

      I just flat out dislike lock in. I have several different MP3 players in my house from several different manufactures. My daughter has an iPod and a previous generation no-name player. I have a Windows Smartphone and a PSP. Of all of them, the iPod is by far the biggest hassle to use because we just happened to be using different desktop music players before I bought the iPod.

      Windows Media Player, WinAmp and MusicMatch all played pretty nicely together, mostly because none of them insisted on doing anything radical. But getting music onto and off of the MP3 players quickly became a hassle. The SmartPhone would only play ball with ActiveSync on a PC while the iPod refused to work with anything but iTunes. The ActiveSync wasn't a huge issue because it didn't necesitate I change my music player, but my daughter experienced all kinds frustration as she had to abandon the way she previously had her music organised and redo it all for iTunes.

      The thing is, I don't want to use iTunes and neither does my daughter. That's not a crack on Apple or the fine people who developed iTunes, I just happen to like what I currently use. What is a crack on Apple is that they had, and IMHO still have the ability to make a portable player that's easy to use with any desktop player and they just refuse to do it. That doesn't make them evil, it just puts them on the same ethical level as Microsoft. If they're ok with that and you're ok with that then more power to you, but it's increasingly looking like this is the first and last iPod in my house unless Apple makes some changes.

      TW

    57. Re:Wow, news to me by moonty · · Score: 1

      I've found numerous advantages over other MP3 players -- to name a few, the interface is smooth, the clickwheel is amazingly easy to use, and the compact size is admirable, at the very least. Also, the stock headphones are some of the highest quality stock headphones I've used (though they're not terribly high quality objectively, of course.)

    58. Re:Wow, news to me by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      Actually, you are wrong. The iPod isn't a promotional thing for the iTMS; rather, it's the opposite. Apple makes almost now money off the music they sell in the iTMS, as most of it goes to the record labels. They just use it to drive iPod sales.

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    59. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think he is. I'm sure you can copy music off of iTunes, that's the whole point of iTunes. From the Slashdot summary it sounds as though you can't normally copy music off of your iPod. I doubt that many people would expect that.

      No, the point of iTunes is to play and manage your music collection. I can't imagine why you'd think copying off of it is the primary function, especially since it doesn't actually contain anything. Of course if you did want to copy something from its library, you could just use cp, or drag the file's icon into another folder...just like you would with the iPod. The only thing that makes your FUD even remotely coherent is that iTunes doesn't have a command to import files from an iPod (or any other player). This is a flaw in iTunes, as the GP pointed out.

    60. Re:Wow, news to me by oc255 · · Score: 1

      Meh, maybe it's a status symbol. But sometimes I can't see what audio player someone has because they keep it in their pocket and replace the stock headphones with 3rd party ones.

      I bought one because I'm a sell-out consumer that can't build my own. I wish I were more underground like my neighbor who has one made out of cardboard and cheetos.

    61. Re:Wow, news to me by lunax · · Score: 1

      Uhh, you can copy music off an iPod. The trick is that they are in a hidden folder. And honestly, it's not that hard to have hidden folders show up in a file manager. The only DRM issue is with music bought from iTunes Music Store, which is an issue with most online music stores. Sure you can't just plug your ipod in to anyones computer and use itunes to take music off the ipod. One assumption is that if you are connecting the ipod to somene elses computer then the music on that computer is probably not yours. Making it slightly difficult to tranfer music off the ipod probably helps keep the RIAA's rabid dogs out of Apples way. On the other hand it would be nice to be able to use an ipod with itunes on any computer that has been authorized to the ipod owners account.

    62. Re:Wow, news to me by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      Ipod wasn't really meant for those who understand DRM...

      WTF?

      You understand it can play MP3s, right?
      You know, those things you can rip from CDs and have no freaking DRM at all.

      Just because you have an iPod doesn't mean you have to use iTMS.

    63. Re:Wow, news to me by oc255 · · Score: 1

      Lock yourself in? You download, you own, you leave. You're free. It's not like you stream off the Apple Store forever.

      iTunes not playing .ogg is annoying, yeah I'll admit that. I know there's an open-source plugin that allows you do to that. But your indie player probably won't do stuff like play your music over wireless to your living room (simply) as the airport express does.

      But most importantly, I'm an apple fan-boy because my I.T. job is complicated enough. Do what you want. In fact, everyone shut up, including me. Run Linux, run Windows, buy Apple products, don't buy Apple products, go jogging, watch TV, listen to [music genre], hate [music genre], play [sport], ignore [sport]. It's your choice and my opinions don't fit in your choice.

    64. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nothing wrong Ipod/Itunes, very user friendly which isn't a bad thing, but I don't want to lock myself into such a service, I have a feeling that eventually downloadable music (the legal stuff) will converge into one simple DRM format that all the stores use."

      service? what service. i have payed exactly $0.00 for the 20gb of music I have on it. As for ogg vorbois - PFFFF its just like VQF was back in 1997. No one used it, it wasn't a serious contender, so it died off. I dont get why everyone loves odd verbose so much anyways. they sound exactly the same and play on less shit. yeah theres advancing tech for you. But you probably weren't around downloading mp2's either.

      you newbies make me sick.

    65. Re:Wow, news to me by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      I plan on getting one of the speaker docks to put in the nursery for our new baby and have a playlist of just children's music.

      Children's music. shudder

      Uh, you better throw a quarter in the Therapy Jar for every hour of crappy, simplistic music.

      I had a steady musical diet of the same rock and roll my parents listened to, and I came out just fine. All those fucking Raffi kids still wet the bed 20 years later.

    66. Re:Wow, news to me by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      This is simplicity in exactly the same way as "just us Internet Explorer and you wont have rendering or interoperability issues." If I don't give MS a pass on their version of "simplicity", why should I say it's ok for Apple?

      Apple make the iPod and makes the software to run it.

      MS doesn't own or make the Internet.

    67. Re:Wow, news to me by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ipod wasn't really meant for ...It's meant for joe-six-pack.

      I don't believe that anything from Apple Computer is meant for "Joe Six-Pack". It's made for "Megan and Justin Portfolio" - the generic upper-middle-class arts-creative-type person. They have the money to pay the premium Apple price, the ability to best use the advanced design and interface character of Apple products, the distaste for technical details, and the subtle contempt for those who would feel the need or desire to skirt the restrictions imposed by Apple for the benefit of the product/company/community/class. They truly believe that bypassing DRM is bad because they feel that they are or more likely, someday will be making their well-heeled living off high priced 'intellectual property'.

      The "Joe SixPack" type middle-class Chevy-truck Saturday-night-watching-wrestling-on-TV people are using their Walmart CD players for portable music needs. They wouldn't buy Apple products even if they were in the same price range, simply because their inherent social inferiority complex alienates them from image that is created by Apple's advertisements.

    68. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is simplicity in exactly the same way as "just us Internet Explorer and you wont have rendering or interoperability issues." If I don't give MS a pass on their version of "simplicity", why should I say it's ok for Apple?

      No, it's simplicity in exactly the same way as "just use a program capable of rendering HTML and you won't have any rendering or interoperability issues. If you can't understand that, just use this [apple.com]." Except that they don't have to bother confusing the newbies with the first part, because everyone who could handle more choices doesn't need to be told to. (Apparently you can't though, so you'd better just use what they give you.)

    69. Re:Wow, news to me by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If I had bought an Ipod, I would have assumed you could copy tracks back and forth, just like you can with any other MP3 player

      I'm pretty sure you can copy MP3s, the restrictions are with iTunes-bought tracks, with its DRM.

    70. Re:Wow, news to me by recursiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, you got it all figured out. But what's this? I'll bet you'll be pretty confused by my case. I have and use an ipod, but keep it concealed. I replaced the headphones with normal crappy looking headphones. No one who sees me would know I have an ipod. If I don't want and don't let anyone know I have an ipod, it can't possibly be a status symbol, right?

      So why do I have it? To listen to music. It works well. Previously, I purchased another mp3 player, only slightly cheaper, and had continuous problems with it. And even when it was working as intended, it was harder to use. The ipod is something like half the size and weight, easier to use, more reliable, and the support (which I used once) is vastly superior. Possibly the smoothest technical support experience I have ever had in my life.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    71. Re:Wow, news to me by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      There's no ethical problem here. The iTunes/iPod bundle is perfectly fine. They tell you what they're doing up front, and you should be an aware enough consumer to read up on this stuff beforehand.

      The problem with Microsoft still isn't that the bundled IE with their OS, it's that they did it in concert with a monopoly that they already held to exert unfair pressure on the market.

      The iPod hardly holds a monopoly on the MP3 player market, and iTunes and the store certainly aren't a monopoly in any sense either. By bundling, Apple is trying to add value to their product. Most people appreciate the one-stop shopping, ease of use and integrated functionality of the product. If you don't, that's fine. But don't put this up as some sort of ethical battle - it isn't. This is just business.

    72. Re:Wow, news to me by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Click wheel. The engineering on it is beautiful.

      Besides that, there are no real amazing things about it. But the click wheel was enough to sell me.

      What bothers me, especially about the iPod, is the attitude people have of "I like this, so you and everyone should like it too!". If the iPod doesn't sit with you, don't buy it. And tell those people who tell you to buy one to shove it in a hole.

    73. Re:Wow, news to me by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      And there's the other thing that bothers me. "I have an opinion about this, so my opinion is therefore right and should be shared by everyone!" What a load of crap. If people like iPods, they'll buy and use them. If not, they won't. Generalizing that "iPods are definatly for lusers" is plain out fallicious.

    74. Re:Wow, news to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 0, Troll
      You understand it can play MP3s, right?

      Tell that to the 95% of iPod users who don't even know what DRM is and ripped with the default settings. They are locked into Apple for life, or until they re-encode all of their music. Which is not likely to happen.

      The iPod is everything the /. crowd hate about the RIAA and all the other companies that want to "0wn" music. The fact that it is accepted, relished ever, is due to the fan boys. Something any /.'er should be used to, but the iPod support still surprises me.

      It sucks on every level that normally matters to geeky people, and it excels for those who would normally buy Louis Viton bags. All image. Suxors! :-)

      Just because you have an iPod doesn't mean you have to use iTMS.

      What? You can't even install the free Quicktime Player without getting iTunes forced on you. If that had been done by someone else, e.g. Microsoft, we'd all be up in arms. But it's apple, the company that takes from OSS but never gives. My only explination is that the iPod adverts must work really well, because they've got the /. crowd hooked.

    75. Re:Wow, news to me by superstick58 · · Score: 1

      HEHEH That's a great post. The funniest use of sarcasm I've seen in a while. Even better than any posts on the sarcasm detector article from yesterday. Thanks for the laugh.

    76. Re:Wow, news to me by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple make the iPod and makes the software to run it.

      MS doesn't own or make the Internet.


      Or you could just reverse it and say:

      MS makes the web server (IIS) the web development software (asp.net) the browser and the OS all these are run on.

      Apple doesn't own or make the MP3 file format or any of the music that runs on their players.

      I'm not actually suggesting this is a reasonable thing to say, but it is similar to your statement.

    77. Re:Wow, news to me by iamnotanumber6 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, I don't want to use iTunes and neither does my daughter.

      Well then it would be pretty dumb to buy an iPod.

      There are plenty of other competitive choices out there.

    78. Re:Wow, news to me by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      The GodFather is the end all of mp3 tagging/organization and naming. There is no fucking substitute.

      If you're anal about your mp3/ogg/aac/et al collection organization/filenaming/tagging (of any conceivable kind, not just ID31-2.2) you need this program.

      It can do mass renames of all files based on tags, mass tag generation based on filename, fill in track#s and those are just the basic features. You can freaking write scripts for it! Tired of lame things in the comment field in those mp3s you downloaded? You can empty every single one of them in your entire collection in about 5 mouse clicks.

      The Godfather is to all other mp3 tagging/naming utilities what Photoshop is to fucking black and white only paint with no mouse support.

      The only downside is the steep learning curve, it's got an interface about as complicated as 3D Studio MAX.

      Just look at this feature list:

      * Batch rename of files using Tag/Filename/Folder name/Audio file information.

      * User defined Formats using Tag fields, File/Folder name or Tokens, Mpeg bitrate/mode as variables .
      * Powerful case conversion including custom case and all the options you would ever want.
      * Replacement matrix. ( remove unwanted characters or words or replace them. User defined matrix )
      * Smart filters enable you to have only the files that are potentially wrong listed for renaming.
      * Further refine your list to be processed by marking files to be skipped or ever edit the end result your self.
      * Undo function.

      * Batch Tag update.

      * Supports both ID3v1 & ID3v2 up to date versions.
      * Supports Ogg Vorbis comments.
      * Supports APEv2 tags.
      * Select specific fields to be updated
      * Use File/Folder tokens, Tag variables to create tag information
      * Filter files by the existence of tags or even by the existence of specific fields
      * Update either Tag or all of them.
      * Option to clear specific fields.
      * Option to skip non empty fields.
      * Use the case options.
      * Use of the replacement matrix.
      * Update tags by copying/moving or auto synchronizing one to the other.
      * Delete all Tags or either one of them.
      * Batch process of pictures/lyrics ( export, delete or both )
      * Complete control trough the update process.

      * Manual / single file editor.

      * All of the above options are laid out to selectively choose, either one of them or all of them, for renaming or Tag update or both.
      * Update or remove either of the tags
      * Full ID3 v2 support including.. pictures,lyrics and more than 20 fields.
      * Full Ogg Vorbis support including all proposed fields plus any number of user defined ones..
      * Full APEv2 support including all proposed fields plus any number of user defined ones..
      * File browser with detailed info of Tags & mpeg or Ogg vorbis/mpc/ape information , sorting and so on.
      * Intuitive interface so potentially wrong fields/filenames are immediately found and presented.

      * Organize.

      * Easily create/merge play lists with preview support or simply find and listen to your favorite music.
      * Encode/decode your files with LAME,Ogg Vorbis or mpcenc. (trans code with out losing tag information from one format to the other)
      * Restructure the files on your hard disk ( copy,move or even create shortcuts ) in new user defined location based on Tag field information.
      * Find duplicate files using smart and aggressive detection.
      * Export files in delimited, fixed length format, Simple HTML or multiple pages using user defined templates.
      * Import information from delimited files to rename and.or update your files, customized mapping to columns.

      * Play your mp3's..

      * Internal player with 16 band equalizer.
      * Display tag info/ly

      --

      Question everything

    79. Re:Wow, news to me by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1
      The iPod had an 82 percent share of the market in U.S. retail stores in the 12 months ended in August, up from 64 percent in the same period a year earlier, and 33 percent two years ago, according to Port Washington, New York-based NPD Group Inc.

      That's ccording to Bloomberg.

      In fact, on the client side, Windows accounted for 87 percent of all sales in 1999, a figure that will decline to 85 percent by 2004.

      That's ccording to CNET.

      Both iTunes and IE are "bundled" products. Although you can get either by itself, the most common way to get them is to have them bundled with either your iPod or your Windows OS respectively. Neither IE or iTunes started out with commanding market share, but they both built share very quickly.

      So now we have it on record: the music store is a loss leader. Jobs said Apple would pay its dues to the RIAA, then seek to make money where it could, from its line of hardware accessories. When the conversation turned to rivals such as eTunes and Napster, Jobs said: "They don't make iPods, so they don't have a related business where they do [make money]".
      That's ccording to The Register.

      This does, in my book, give Jobs a slight ethical advantage. He's actually telling the truth about his goals and aspirations for the iPod and iTunes. However, it still leaves the whole iTunes/iPod thing very much in the same territory, both bundling-wise and monopoly-wise as IE/Windows.

      If it's an ethical issue, then it's either eithical(or not) for both of them. If it's just business, then they're both just good business people. In my opinion, both practices are bad for the consumer, even though on the surface each one looks like it's making the consumer's life easier.

      TW
    80. Re:Wow, news to me by Microlith · · Score: 1

      So use EPHPOD.

      Hell even when using iTunes to sync I didn't have to surrender control of my music collection to iTunes.

      I think slashdotters just like to complain when the gadget doesn't do a billion things, and instead just tries to do one thing well.

    81. Re:Wow, news to me by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

      Post of the Year! Decade even!

      Very nice, my AC friend. Very nice.

      --
      why? forty-two.
    82. Re:Wow, news to me by fbjon · · Score: 1

      All iRiver players play ogg. My 20gb hd-iRiver can take a beating both software-wise and hardware-wise. I haven't heard of any software bugs like that, and the firmware can be easily upgraded anyway. The new mini 5G version have a touch-strip for scrolling, similar to the apple wheel. (As I understand, that wheel is patented). And they are geek-friendly. As an example: tell me how many portable music players have optical input AND output?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    83. Re:Wow, news to me by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The only real format that the ipod doesn't support is WMA, I don't count ogg as a real format because so few people use it, except for their own personal music.

      I always find it amusing how the Apple fans belittle OGG for being out there in the fringe. Yet at the same time, the market share of the Apple Macintosh is in the single digits. I mean, c'mon - get a real computer!

    84. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...living in your mothers basement...

      I'm living in my Father's basement, you insensitive clod!

    85. Re:Wow, news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see stupid poseurs still buying iPods.

      Keep up the good work drones.

    86. Re:Wow, news to me by cloak42 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, .m4a files have no DRM on them whatsoever. It's the files bought from the iTMS that have DRM encoded on them (.m4p/.m4b files). I've copied .m4a files from my friend's computer with no complaints from iTunes whatsoever.

      Also, you most certainly can install Quicktime as a standalone app. You merely have to look for the link on the download page that says "download standalone installer" and *poof* there you go.

      For the record, I not only do not have to use iTunes to play my .m4a files (I use Winamp for that), but I can rip to .m4a with other programs (I use Easy CD-DA Extractor) and can even play protected files in Winamp (using a plugin that reads the DRM through iTunes that is installed but not running).

    87. Re:Wow, news to me by jdog1016 · · Score: 1

      And then those are those members of the slashdot crowd, who, frustrated by the WORTHLESS interfaces of every other player on the market, but were educated enough about such things to recognize the source of the problem, and its solution - the iPod.

      The iPod is probably one of the most brilliantly conceived wonders of HCI *ever*. The iPod took a problem that no one else had solved effectively and reduced it to 4 buttons, a wheel, and some Very Easy menus. But you go on using that piece of shit 1997 player and piece of shit software Winamp. Why so many people still use winamp is totally beyond me. Its the most cumbersome, awkward interface that anyone could have possibly put on a computer, and it hasn't fixed these age-old problems EVER.

      And by the way, please tell me what music player you can buy right now that doesn't use DRM or lock out another vendor's DRM.

    88. Re:Wow, news to me by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      I don't know how long that will last. Not long ago I saw a big sign in Wal-Mart that said "iPod coming June 6". I'm not kidding (Though that date may be wrong.)

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    89. Re:Wow, news to me by E+Galois · · Score: 1

      IntelliVision used a click-wheel type controller on their 70s video game console way back in the, uh, 70s - insanely great engineering...

    90. Re:Wow, news to me by ztirffritz · · Score: 1

      If you have more than 50Gb of music files and you're not backing it up somewhere aside from your portable music player you're a fool. It takes weeks to rip that many CDs. Any music your purchase from the iTMS is also lost forever unless you have a back-up.

      --
      Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    91. Re:Wow, news to me by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the 95% of iPod users who don't even know what DRM is and ripped with the default settings.

      Cartman, what the hell are you talking about? If you rip a CD with iTunes, you get unencumbered MP3 or AAC files. I don't know of a way you could make them have DRM even if you wanted to.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    92. Re:Wow, news to me by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Of course, had they used a real filesystem, such as ext2, or ffs, or xfs, or reiserfs, or jfs, or hell, even minixfs, they could have multiple links to the files, so they could have their nice hashed files for player ease, and still allow easy recovery of files. Hell, apple even supports ffs already. Why couldn't they have just used that?

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    93. Re:Wow, news to me by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      The iPod took a problem that no one else had solved effectively and reduced it to 4 buttons, a wheel, and some Very Easy menus.

      I always hear this. I've been using MP3 players since they were first released and I've always thought they were the simpliest things in the bloody world. I've had friends (VERY non-computer nerd friends) use the early ones as well and it would take them all of three seconds to figure it out. I have NO IDEA where this myth came from that portible music players were hard to use before the Ipod came around!!!! Sure they are pretty white and have cool comercials, but I am at a loss when people talk about how they "revolutionized" portable players.

      BTW, I use the new Zen Micro. Yes it supports DRMed software, but it doesn't try to force me into ONE online music source (which just happens to be owned by the vendor of the player).

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    94. Re:Wow, news to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      As far as I know, .m4a files have no DRM on them whatsoever.

      That's not my point; m4a files will only play on Apple hardware players. This is the tie in I mean.

      WRT quicktime sans iTunes, I'll need to check that out, thanks for the pointer! I do feel though that they are becoming as agressive as Real, making the freebie links low profile. IMHO this is tricking non-experienced users into buying something they don't need.

    95. Re:Wow, news to me by j-cloth · · Score: 1
      You almost had me.

      iTunes is bad for all of the same reasons the iPod is great. The iPod interface is brilliant because it is simple. They {decided|found|lucked out and hit} exactly the features that people need in their pockets and delivered it beautifully.

      Then they decided that people needed nothing more than that on their desktops. iTunes gives you no control over your library -- especially when you put it beside Winamp or even WMP. Plugins? Who would ever want to extend an application?

      And while I'm ranting about iTunes, why the hell does my media player feel the need to install several services unrelated to anything? I needed quicktime on my work PC and now I have an iPodService running? wtf? (the previous wtf can be applied to either the unneccessary services or to the fact that quicktime cannot be installed without iTunes.)

    96. Re:Wow, news to me by cloak42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I completely agree about the agressive tactics WRT installing Quicktime. I freaked out the first time I downloaded QT to find that there was iTunes built into the install (without even an option to not install it), and went specifically looking for a standalone installer link.

    97. Re:Wow, news to me by fermion · · Score: 1
      I do not believe this is true. The filenames are there, and even the directory is there. The only thing is that the directory is hidden. On Mac OS one can get to the directories through the terminal. It should then be a simple matter of cp.

      This is now the same as adding music from an unknown sorce. Itunes has no way to do a lookup for song or album name, so you must reorganize yourself.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    98. Re:Wow, news to me by pLnCrZy · · Score: 1

      ...spoken like a true cynic.

      The fact that I have 2 iPods (1 20GB and 1 shuffle) and that neither of them have the standard "yuppie" headphones to advertise what I'm using to play my music has nothing to do with the fact that I just liked the interface and functionality of the players.

      The fact that I buy expensive sunglasses has nothing to do with the fact that they are optically superior to el-cheapo-drug-store-rack sunglasses (try shining a laser or other focused light source through cheap sunglasses, then shine them through a pair of Oakleys or Maui Jims or Ray Bans, or look at the polarization qualities, etc.)

      The fact that I would love to own a Ferrari, a BMW M6, a Mercedes 600SL, or a Maserati have nothing to do with the fact that they are engineered, built, and perform at a level you'll never see from a Ford/Dodge/Chevrolet/etc. and that some people actually enjoy driving to the point where a finely tuned machine is exhilarating... it's all because we're just yuppies.

      I suppose I shouldn't mention my big-screen HDTV or high-end audio system either, because it certainly can't be because I love music and immersive video experiences... it's just because I'm a yuppie.

    99. Re:Wow, news to me by wed128 · · Score: 1

      because windows doesn't support them...

    100. Re:Wow, news to me by Momoru · · Score: 1

      First of all, buying expensive products has nothing to do with what I said. Any hard drive mp3 player is an expensive product. What I said was that people pay extra for iPods so they can have an "iPod", instead of "an mp3 player". They then justify the purchase by claiming superior aspects of the click-wheel or whatever. Take for example the iRiver...it holds more data, shows pictures, has an FM tuner, Microphone, audio input/output, and is not tied to a specific application out of the box (iTunes). Sound quality tested by independant third parties show little difference (mp3 quality is supposedly sucky to true audiophiles anyways). Its roughly the same weight and size, and costs the same amount. It is superior in almost every way (we'll give you the superiority of apples control for the sake of argument), yet most people don't even look at it as an option.

      You personally may have done an evaluation of mp3 players and decided that the features of the iPod are superior and worth the extra money. That's all well and good, but doesn't represent the majority of people I know who own them. People that wear them on big gaudy bands around their necks...in restarants...at night.

      Furthermore, I don't begrudge you liking high end things, I have many of these same things as well, the difference is that the "brand" Apple iPod is currently a fad. It would be like when the Tamogatchi craze was in fashion...sure the generic virtual pet has more features, but its not a TAMOGATCHI brand, so you're not cool!!!

      To use your example, the buying the iPod would be the equivilent of wanting a high performance, attractive luxury car, and picking a BMW 328 over an Acura RL. The Acura has better performance, comparable luxury, and just as many features, is cheaper, in addition to better gas mileage and room, yet many people pick the BMW over it because of the name and the recognition by their peers.

    101. Re:Wow, news to me by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      It's a pity I can't add you to my friends list, that was just delightful. The use of 'seven' and 'three' was the cherry (or APPAL) on top.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    102. Re:Wow, news to me by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      It's very easy to take music off of the iPod. All you have to do is change your settings to show hidden folders. Then you can browse to your music on the iPod. Apple sets the folder to hidden and then claims that you "can't copy from it." Pretty lame if you ask me.

      The only problem with that way is that the music isn't organized very well so it is best to have a program to do it with.

    103. Re:Wow, news to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Bad wording on my part. It's not the DRM, it's the incompatible AAC format that'll only work on Apple hardware. That's the default IIRC and most users are using it without realising the long-term effects.

    104. Re:Wow, news to me by KillShill · · Score: 1

      this feature brought to you by DRM.

      courtesy of your friends who won't let you own your own hardware.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    105. Re:Wow, news to me by Mondoz · · Score: 1

      You can do just that.
      You can add music through iTunes if you want it to show up in the iPod menu system on the actual device with drag and drop through Windows. No problem.

      You can also use the device as a standard fireware/USB removable HDD. Drag & drop file transfer in Windows, without iTunes even installed. No problem.

      The 'problem' is that the MP3 files put on the device through iTunes are renamed, and put into special directories.
      You can copy these back to your HDD all you want, No problem. Except for the fact that the filenames were changed. That's the only gotcha.
      Not a very big one, if you ask me, and this application apparently renames the files back again.

      --
      /sig
    106. Re:Wow, news to me by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the 95% of iPod users who don't even know what DRM is and ripped with the default settings. They are locked into Apple for life, or until they re-encode all of their music. Which is not likely to happen.

      95% Whose ass did you pull that statistic out of?

      Of the people I know with iPods, most don't use iTMS (that's the store) and just put MP3s on it. A few buy a song now and then, but mostly just put MP#s on it.

      I don't know a single iPod user who uses iTMS more than 10% of the time.

      What? You can't even install the free Quicktime Player without getting iTunes forced on you.

      Read my comment again.
      I said "Just because you have an iPod doesn't mean you have to use iTMS".

      iTMS is iTunes MusicStore .
      Again, you do not need iTMS to use an iPod. You need iTunes. I'm sure you know the difference.

      If the DRM of the iPod bugs you that much, don't buy one. But at the same time, don't be so lame as to think that you must use DRM'd files to use an iPod.

    107. Re:Wow, news to me by Jerivix · · Score: 1

      Thank God somebody mentioned this. I was gonna have to bloody myself with a keyboard.

    108. Re:Wow, news to me by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Heh. D-Day.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    109. Re:Wow, news to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Way to read the other replies before spouting off. My beef is with the proprietry format everyone is ripping on, not DRM or iTMS specifically. Real people (ones not on slashdot) ARE NOT using mp3's in iPods. They are using the default settings. I know, because all of my friends aren't geeky in any way, and all of them are running on defaults. The plug and play generation. These are who the iPod is aimed at.

      And they are locked in now. If it had be M$ pulling this, the reaction would be hugely different.

    110. Re:Wow, news to me by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      They are using the default settings. I know, because all of my friends aren't geeky in any way, and all of them are running on defaults. The plug and play generation. These are who the iPod is aimed at.

      Sorry to hear that your friends are uninformed.

    111. Re:Wow, news to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Sorry to hear that your friends are uninformed

      No, they just have better things to do than hang about on geek websites each day, and working in a geeky job I'm glad to have friends who don't care about IT/gadgets. They saw the adverts and wanted some of that. You're just jealous because you probably don't have many friends outside of online games involving dragons and other such nonsense.

    112. Re:Wow, news to me by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      No, they just have better things to do than hang about on geek websites each day, and working in a geeky job I'm glad to have friends who don't care about IT/gadgets. They saw the adverts and wanted some of that. You're just jealous because you probably don't have many friends outside of online games involving dragons and other such nonsense.

      Wrong again.

      I don't work IT. Most of my friends don't work IT. Most of my friends don't bother with /.

      They are, however, smart enough to know that you van put MP3s on an iPod.

    113. Re:Wow, news to me by boowebb · · Score: 1

      FYI - you can copy songs off an iPod. It's just a hard drive. You may not keep the songs in the same structure, but you can copy them off.

      The irritating thing is that you are tied to one library and if you want to switch libraries you must delete your iPod. It also tends to delete ratings and play counts you've had associated.

      I will echo others' thoughts - I've had nothing but good experiences with the iPod. Having 10k songs on it however - the scroll wheel may not be the best navigation mechanism.

    114. Re:Wow, news to me by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Which proprietary format are you referring to? MP3, WMA or AAC? They're all pretty much the same as far as "proprietary" goes. If you were pushing for Ogg Vorbis support, I'd see your point, and I do hope Apple sees the light and adds in support for that.

      And how are they locked in? Ok, they spent some time ripping CDs, but they can just re-rip them if they need them in another format and don't want to take the hit to quality by transcoding them to MP3. I rip to Apple Lossless format, then convert to AAC to put on the iPod. Now Apple Lossless is a proprietary format, but it has been reverse-engineered.

    115. Re:Wow, news to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Which proprietary format are you referring to? MP3, WMA or AAC? They're all pretty much the same as far as "proprietary" goes.

      Sigh. You know what I mean, mp3 is more "open" than the others, in that any player will play them. Joe Sixpack isn't going to think to re-rip their media, they'll just stick with ipods. If that had been MS, everyone would be up in arms about it.

      Ok, they spent some time ripping CDs, but they can just re-rip them if they need them in another format and don't want to take the hit to quality by transcoding them to MP3.

      They won't. They don't know and they don't care. The conversation in the shop will go "can I play my iPod tracks on that", "no", "OK, well give me the iPod mk X".

    116. Re:Wow, news to me by tricorn · · Score: 1

      The "lock in" factor seems to me to be a whole lot less than anything Microsoft has done. At least iTunes gives you an easy option to rip to MP3 (or WAV or AIFF) (and the choice is persistent, once you make it it stays set for all imports or conversions). The iPod will also play other formats, though not WMA. So since the iPod doesn't play WMA, does that mean that on-line music stores shouldn't use that format?

      As a long-time Mac user, I'm resigned to being told that I can't do on-line banking or reserve seats for Star Wars unless I use Internet Explorer on Windows, that the really cool video of a guy flying a hang glider into powerlines can only be seen on a version of Windows Media Player that is only available for Windows (and VLC won't play it), or that the Excel spreadsheet embedded in a Word document won't come out right when TextEdit or Appleworks opens it. My efforts to get people to distribute stuff as PDF instead of .doc get greeted with "it's your fault for using a niche computer".

      So I get excited when Firefox and Opera get good press and more people start using it, as it helps break the dependence on platform-specific Web pages. I get excited when iPod becomes so popular, as it forces people to adapt to MY platform for once (and Apple really didn't make it that difficult to do on a Windows machine, anyway). Lock-in? I'll show you lock-in.

      There are open source implementations of AAC, it looks like more than for WMA (and at least some of the WMA programs use the Microsoft codec rather than implement it themselves, similar to the way the DivX format started out). I wouldn't call AAC any more "locked in" than Ogg Vorbis, except for patent issues (which as also an issue for MP3 and WMA). Ogg Vorbis is clearly the most open from any reasonable standpoint, but it isn't in a wide variety of players, either. If companies want to play AAC music, they can license it just as Apple did.

    117. Re:Wow, news to me by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the late reply.

      It is not very convenient, but if you choose to "Consolidate Library" or something from the menu, it WILL just copy all the files from the pod to the computer, well at least in my case.

      So I load a file in my ipod, on my laptop f.e. Hook the pod to my main machine at home, "consolidate library" (or something to that effect out of the menu of iTUnes, which I use as a good interface for playing music, I dont buy crippled AAC) and presto, the new files are now on my desktop.

      hth

  3. Big Deal by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Informative

    iPods store the music totally openly in the directory structure. You can download the music from any file browser that can see the disk - like the command line on OS X for example. It's hardly rocket science.

    1. Re:Big Deal by flamearrows · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But it isn't obvious to the common users, nor is it an easy or efficient method of doing so. The winamp plug-in solves both problems.

      --
      The indiscriminate use of vulgar language is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker
    2. Re:Big Deal by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1
      Ah! As per my (what will probably be marked as redundant) post below (since you posted seconds before I did) I had trouble with OS X - but I didn't try the command line, only Finder, which hid the files from me. Don't really have a reason to try it now but thanks for the pointer.

      Now, do you think you and I should get lawyers? Because as much as I like Macs and the iPod I'm using, Apple might just find a reason to sue us ...

    3. Re:Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Oh FSCK the "common" users!

      Why don't they damn learn to use their computer, instead of either running away like stupid luddites or excepting the computer to do everything magicly.

      The fucking stupid, lazy, indolent, thick, retarded common users can go to hell. They can bloody well learn to use the fucking machine or they can go to fucking hell.

    4. Re:Big Deal by Trillan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The real problem is that the story is in the mainstream media now.

    5. Re:Big Deal by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yes, because a user who doesn't know how to copy the contents from their iPod is somehow savvy enough to ditch Windows Media Player in favor of Winamp.

    6. Re:Big Deal by selderrr · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's hardly rocket science

      um.. no... or there would have to be a rocket involved, not ?

    7. Re:Big Deal by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      It's hardly rocket science

      um.. no... or there would have to be a rocket involved, not ?


      And perhaps some science too.

    8. Re:Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, because a user who doesn't know how to copy the contents from their iPod is somehow savvy enough to ditch Windows Media Player in favor of Winamp.

      A poster who can't tell the difference between Windows Media Player and iTunes is hardly in a position to comment on the savviness of others.

    9. Re:Big Deal by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      Some reviewers crap all over iTunes and say that "the MuVo allows for easy directory browsing so you have no need for a specific program". I agree with you, that is much, much less obvious to ordinary users than a single program acting as the sync, database, storage manager and music player. As iTunes or WinAmp with this plugin.

    10. Re:Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point he is making is clearly that people who are not very savvy probably aren't using any alternative media players when the standard one will do. Windows users are typically replacing WMP with Winamp - not iTunes with Winamp.

    11. Re:Big Deal by newend · · Score: 1

      In the parent's defense iTunes comes on a CD with your iPod. You have to discover winamp through a friend or wonderful informative sites like /.

    12. Re:Big Deal by caddisfly · · Score: 1

      duh! ...and thus the meaning of the cliche -- it requires neither a rocket or science. ...e.g. - it is simple; not complicated;

    13. Re:Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the file system is open (just hidden flagged).

      The central issue is you cannot add to the iPod playlist without iTunes, and your iPod can only be associated with 1 iTunes installation.

      I use my shuffle at work and home. I cannot push mp3's to it from both locations without reassociating and wiping the playlist and all tracks completely. It's really annoying and obviously designed for people with a single primary PC. For me, this will actually be very handy when I want to tweak the playlist slightly or add a track.

    14. Re:Big Deal by wootest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most reviewers who do demand direct directory access are generally clueless about how metadata, organization or both combined work with the devices. Even the iPod shuffle needs to store play order when used in the playlist mode - how do you suppose you put a few songs to the top of the list using folder structures?

      Low-level mavens might be more comfortable with folder arrangements as they involve 'less magic'. But things that can be in more places than one at the same time are just not good things to run directly on folder structures, because they'd require maintenance. I guess playlists are doable via folders of aliases/shortcuts/symlinks, but anything more complicated than that is just not tenable - like smart playlists.

    15. Re:Big Deal by iainl · · Score: 2, Funny

      As someone who did some Rocket Science at university, I'd have to say that it isn't exactly Brain Surgery.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    16. Re:Big Deal by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The most sophisticated databases on the planet can deal with data living where the end user wants to put it.

      These pseudo-databases should be able to do the same.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    17. Re:Big Deal by wootest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called playlists.

    18. Re:Big Deal by wootest · · Score: 1

      Actually, let's clarify that.

      Hiearchal data organization is good. I like it. Folder organization in a file system provides an easy way out if you want to have it. However it also makes things like playlists and metadata - I mentioned "play order" as a good example - harder to implement, and certainly harder for the user to set up. Either way you turn it you're going to have to make compromises.

    19. Re:Big Deal by zapp · · Score: 1

      Even though they are stored in a directory structure on the iPod's drive, their layout is obfuscated.

      Rather than being organized as they would be in your iTunes music folder, they are in folders something like this (this is off the top of my head):

      001\01-Feel Good Inc.mp3
      002\04-Run Away.mp3
      003\02-Clint Eastwood.mp3 ...
      While you can simply do a search in there for the song name, there is no way to copy off an entire album without having to get each song individually.

      Of course, all this is also stored in the iTunesDB stored in the iPod, so all these apps coming out to manage your iPod and copy things off of it simply read that DB, and extract the files.

      --
      no comment
    20. Re:Big Deal by Inominate · · Score: 1

      There is a python script for the shuffle allowing just that...

      http://shuffle-db.sourceforge.net/

      You put the mp3's on there in whatever directory structure you like, put the small python script in the root, and then run it whenever you're done adding/removing mp3s.

    21. Re:Big Deal by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It's the job of the application and the coders to adapt to the end user, not the other way around.

      Nothing about obfuscating file or directory names makes dealing with filesystem data any more easy or efficient.

      The more obscure you make individual components of a system, the less manageable and maintaingable they become. This isn't just an end user hostility problem. It's also an engineering and debugging problem.

      An Apple developer should be able to do at least as well as a Linux user writing shell scripts.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    22. Re:Big Deal by wootest · · Score: 1

      It's the job of the application and the coders to adapt to the end user, not the other way around.

      My point exactly. What I'm saying is that making the file system the data base makes it harder to do stuff like playlists, and close to impossible to keep any kind of metadata that's not standard within the id3 tags (and similar containers for other audio formats).

      Do I think it's good that the structure of, for example, the iPod makes it near impossible to organize without the help of a secondary app? No. As a programmer, it pains me a bit, and I agree with your opinion on principle. Obscurity is never good, and closed file formats aren't exactly icing. But it's important to know that shell script parallels often don't hold up; is it *usable* to ask of a user to run a script to update a metadata database (for example) when an item's been added, for example? (The ability to attach scripts - like Apple's own Folder Actions - to filesystem operations withstanding.)

      It's my personal opinion that the separate structure + helper app solution (including features enabled by the use of it, like smart playlists) currently makes the process of organizing significantly easier (and not particularly 'hostile', unless you really hate the helper app) than keeping a folder structure. It's not up to me to define what end users like more - everyone's an end user and wants different things, and even given a streamlined average, who really knows? - but if I placed my bets it'd be on solutions more like the separate database than the folder structures.

      All that said... the perfect structure to solve this problem obviously isn't any one of these two, and I hope that people are looking into creating it now.

  4. Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""Using it with third-gen iPod and Windows ME," wrote Brian Cape in the Winamp forum. "Absolutely superb, no problems at all." "

    No problems at all with Windows ME? It's a miricle!

    1. Re:Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows MiraclE - Divine intervention today!

    2. Re:Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just like there's no problem with the way that you spell.

      ~Kalinga

    3. Re:Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exictly!

    4. Re:Windows ME by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      A program that "works" under ME is impresive, what is more impresive it that some people still use ME... I think these people also like to be kicked, it is the only way to explain this behavior. Had a buddy who was using ME on his ICS/Firewall box untill about 3 months ago... he has been happier and has had more free time since.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    5. Re:Windows ME by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Be nice! He's using a 3rd gen iPod and WinME, so he's obviously been out of work for a few years.

    6. Re:Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gundam sucks and you're not funny, loser.

  5. Actually, on a Windows box ... by DikSeaCup · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've already been able to do this. Now, I don't get the files in the nifty directory structure of Artist/Album/track# songtitle.mp3, but hey, all I need after copying the files off of the iPod (using standard windows copying), I can just add the copied directory into *any* iTunes Library and iTunes will be nice enough to sort things however I told iTunes to do so.

    Of course I didn't read the article, so there might be something to it ... but I suspect it's not that hard to get the files via a Linux installation. The only platform I have that I have had trouble pulling the files off of the iPod on is Mac.

    1. Re:Actually, on a Windows box ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do it extremely easily with applescript; so sh*t *p

    2. Re:Actually, on a Windows box ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this allow me to drag tracks onto the ipod in the same manner? Or do I still need to use itunes to update it?

      Jack

    3. Re:Actually, on a Windows box ... by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      The only platform I have that I have had trouble pulling the files off of the iPod on is Mac.

      The cp command works for me. Maybe I need to try something less obvious?

    4. Re:Actually, on a Windows box ... by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1

      Sorry my brain was stuck in Finder when I was trying this. And it was more of an exercise in curiosity at the time than anything else, so it wasn't important enough to put much thought into.

    5. Re:Actually, on a Windows box ... by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Just fire up Terminal on your Mac and you're set.

      --

      mbbac

    6. Re:Actually, on a Windows box ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Mac users were scared of the command line. Boy, how times change.

      Anyway, most Windows users (atleast here) probably have Windows Explorer set to show hidden files already. Just drag and drop! Try doing that with Apple's lousy finder.

    7. Re:Actually, on a Windows box ... by Upaut · · Score: 1

      The only platform I have that I have had trouble pulling the files off of the iPod on is Mac.

      I find Broken Helix on the mac to suck songs off my ipod works very well. www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/20856

      --
      3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  6. Re:fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    fucking nerds

    I wish someone would be. :-(

  7. Copying songs from iPod on Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    To copy songs from your iPod on mac os x, open up the terminal and type:

    # Change directory to the ipod music directory. (I'm not sure if iPod Control is the exact name I'm not on a mac at the moment, but it's similar.)
    cd /Volumes/name_of_ipod/iPod Control/music

    # View the files on the iPod
    ls

    # Then copy whatever the files called.
    cp name_of_file

    No plugins, downloads, whatever required :)

    1. Re:Copying songs from iPod on Mac OS X by temcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, that's a helluva lot of typing! Especially those lines that begin with #...

    2. Re:Copying songs from iPod on Mac OS X by martinX · · Score: 1

      Has it come to this? I use a Mac dammit! We used to laugh at those DOS people...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    3. Re:Copying songs from iPod on Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are a genius. Thanks for that command line lesson.

    4. Re:Copying songs from iPod on Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cp name_of_file

      you mean:

      cp name_of_file target_location

      but i'll one up you

      cp /V*/FirstLetter*LastLetter/i*/m*/*[pattern]* Target_directory

      Replace cp with 'ls' to list all files matching your pattern, and you don't need a target_directory for ls.

      For instance, i can use the rexgrep pattern of *[b,B]ritney*[S,s]pears* to pull all the files with her name in them, the case above ignores the possibility of an all caps or abreviated version of her name, so, you may want to alter it to be [b,B][r,R][i,I][t,T] yada yada, but it's much faster to just write a perl script to do that for you...

  8. now taking bets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How long will Apple take to *fix* this?

    1. Re:now taking bets! by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      Probably as soon as they hear the news and figure out a way to convince us that 'it is for our own good'.

    2. Re:now taking bets! by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      They won't.

      Actually, Apples don't care much about the DRM, they just want to sell iPods, and tunes.

      The ones who really cares are in the Phonographic industry, so what you really asking is:

      When de RIAA will demand this to be fixed?

      More importand, they'll demand Apple to fix it, or demand WinAmp to stop providing the plugin? Or both!?

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    3. Re:now taking bets! by jhsiao · · Score: 1
      Some would disagree.

      A few weeks ago, Cringely speculated the following:

      "I think this episode with Wiley and Apple's earlier legal attacks on people who it accused of leaking product information are part of a campaign to look tough to movie studios and record companies. As I've surmised before, Apple is trying to put together a high definition movie download service that requires content from all the major movie studios. If Steve looks soft on IP theft or unwilling to flex his corporate legal muscles, the studios may think he won't adequately protect their corporate jewels."

      Therefore, if this is something that the RIAA doesn't want, Apple may have to close this to pursue their goal of global video domination.

    4. Re:now taking bets! by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      The only way they could stop this is to change the firmware to stop the iPod from being used as an external harddrive. And that would be just dumb of Apple to do.

    5. Re:now taking bets! by Aldric · · Score: 1

      They are probably readying the attack lawyers as we speak.

  9. Meh by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can copy music from my iRiver to my hdd without th e need for any such plugins, it's just like a removable hdd using the USB Mass Storage Device drivers.

    I pity you fools and your shiny white shackles!

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:Meh by Chiralhydra · · Score: 1

      The DMCA lock in in iPods is in some way justifiable, as at the least it proves you can piss off people who want to rip files...

      *Ahem*

      Hang on, why the hell would you want to stop people from copying music back off it!? Its still got the 'protection' and it means you cant back up your tunes on it.

      In a way, having such draconian 'protection' ensures courts can use it as an example of how all HD players *should* lock you down - proving that the other player are 'not cooperating' with the **AA industries...

    2. Re:Meh by tyldis · · Score: 1

      Like said a thousand times already: this is useless.
      You can access the iPod like any other firewire harddrive. You cna copy the files to and from it. No need for a special program to copy them off. To copy files TO the iPod you need to alter a database on the iPod aswell, which means you need some app.

      The format of the DB has been reverse engineered for years and is widely documented. The DB is there because you save time and power reading from the DB instead of scanning vast directories for files and ID3 tags.

    3. Re:Meh by newend · · Score: 1

      If I put all of the music onto my iPod by syncing with iTunes on my computer, then why would I need to pull the music back off? I think it actually makes sense that they tried to block this in order to prevent the masses from using iPods/iTunes to trade music with each other. You have to remember that the RIAA is looking at everyone in their attempt to file the next lawsuit that will keep them afloat.

    4. Re:Meh by Chiralhydra · · Score: 1

      Well as I said - to back up your tunes! Besides which, as the grandparent said, you can use most other HD players to store files on. I understand this is possible with an ipod, but what a load of hassle I have an iriver and I can just plug in and transfer. Realisticly much more music is ripped from the net than other people's HD players... How many mates do u have with HD players anyway?

    5. Re:Meh by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      The tunes are already on your computer. Why would you need to back them up from your iPod?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    6. Re:Meh by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Ipod owners can do the same thing. This just makes it easy for the clueless.

      --

      mbbac

    7. Re:Meh by david.heyman · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I put the tunes on my iPod Shuffle from my Mac at home. Then I travel halfway across the world to Australia with my work Thinkpad. I put my iPod Shuffle into my laptop's USB port to charge and accidentally agreed for the iPod Shuffle to become associated with the Thinkpad. All my music was gone. Now, had I used the file system to copy off all of the music from the iPod onto the Thinkpad as a backup to the iPod Shuffle I'd have been ok. Since I didn't I was screwed!

    8. Re:Meh by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

      I pitty you fools who trust everything they read as fact.

      As it has been mention many times already, it is possible to do this without a plugin, it's just not completely obvious on how to do it.

    9. Re:Meh by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Hang on. The software did EXACTLY what you told it to, and you're bitching? Sounds like you need to refocus the blame.

      There are any number of ways you could have prevented that "accident". That you didn't is your fault and your fault alone.

    10. Re:Meh by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      We can copy music off our iPods in the same way, thanks. On Windows, it works exactly the same way as your iRiver.

      I pity you with your habit of speaking about things you are ignorant of.

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    11. Re:Meh by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      I typed "sudo rm -rf /" on my Mac. All of my data was gone. If only my Mac had a floppy drive, I could have backed it all up. Since it didn't, I was screwed!

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    12. Re:Meh by Chiralhydra · · Score: 1

      Thats true, it did. I think the iPod way of synching is a bit weird, but thats just my opinion and nothing else.

      However, the Point of backing up your files is exactly that - for backup!
      I have all my music on my iriver & my computer, and listen to both. If either goes down, I have a backup - whereas with itunes, you don't, because AIUI, you can't copy back from the player, so it will delete all your tunes when you synch to it. I also wont tell you it's gonna do that!

      Correct me if I'm wrong!

      IMHO, all this guff makes it a bit awkward to use as a roaming copy of your music, and really, is unnecessary in inconvieniencing (if thats a word) - purely there to appease the recording industries - and not really stopping the piracy it was meant to.

    13. Re:Meh by david.heyman · · Score: 1

      Of course it did what I told it to do. I responded to someone saying "Why would you want to backup an iPod". This is an example of why one would want to be able to back up their iPod.

    14. Re:Meh by david.heyman · · Score: 1

      jargoone, did you spend any time in reading the comment in context? Why would you want to backup an iPod? Well, here is an example of a reason I'd want to do it.

    15. Re:Meh by newend · · Score: 1

      I will give it to you that it shouldn't delete everything from your drive without warning. Perhaps first prompt, "would you like to associate with this computer (doing so will remove all of the files on your shuffle)?". If you click yes then have it say "WARNING: You are about to delete all content from your shuffle, proceed?"

      As far as backups, iPods are not intented for backup devices. If you really want to make sure your data is protected go out and buy a tape drive. As an alternative you could buy either an external hard drive or backup to DVD's. I agree that 99.9% of piracy is going to happen through the Internet, but it's like putting a lock on luggage. You could easily cut the zipper, but you want to make it a little less obveous and more difficult.

      This being said I want to let you know I'm against the RIAA's tactics (I won't buy/download any of their media), I'm against DRM, and I'm all about changing the way music is created and distributed.

      Another note, you can upload files onto the iPod as a drive without any problems. You can also d/l the music off the iPod through a hidden folder (I suggest everyone enable show hidden files), but the file names are truncated (probably an FS limitation?).

  10. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You failed it, nerd.

  11. This is news? by moonbender · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe this is news for Winamp users - I doubt it, but I don't use it myself. But there has been software to download songs from the iPod to your harddrive for ages. The inability to do so is pretty much limited to iTunes, every other application dealing with the iPod (and there are dozens) enables you to do that. One popular example for Windows is EphPod. Lots and lots more can be found for multiple platforms at iPodlounge.

    Personally, I use foo_pod, a plugin for the foobar2000 audio player. It's quite powerful, including such features as automatic conversion of formats the iPod doesn't know (e.g. ogg or shorten) and automatic generation of audiobooks. For what it's worth - Wired seems to care - foobar and foo_pod are yet half as small than Winamp and that plugin is. Hah.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    1. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SO it's iTunes that is broken then, file not file a bugreport at Apple.

    2. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and when foobar gets to even half as popular as winamp, maybe we will start to care.

    3. Re:This is news? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      If that's your attitude, maybe you should start reading the New York Times for your computing news instead of Slashdot. I'd wager that among the Slashdot users, foobar already is half as popular as Winamp, maybe more so. Like the first post says: "Winamp? I think my grandparents use to use that back in the early twentieth century..."

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:This is news? by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I use winamp extensively. I've heard a lot of good things about foobar, so I downloaded it and tried it out. I was impressed. It's very flexible and modular. But then I realized something. It doesn't do anything useful to me that winamp doesn't. Also, it's a bitch and a half to get it the way you want it, and the documentation seems pretty sorely lacking. I remember going to unnecessary lengths to figure out how to change the volume. Considering volume adjustment is one of the more common operations an audio player performs, this was discouraging. Since I didn't feel like poring through hundreds of pages of shoddily organized text, I just went back to winamp.

      As impressive as the feature list for foobar2k is, the one feature it's notably missing is ease of use. Winamp just works. And it's no slouch in features or performance either.

      Maybe I'm missing something, but unless I find out about something foobar can do that winamp can't, I have no motivation to spend the time to figure out how to use it.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    5. Re:This is news? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      If you're using WinAmp and you're happy with it, more power to you. Personally, I switched to foobar mostly for two reasons:

      1) I couldn't bear WinAmp's (and most of the other media player's) skinned interface anymore.

      2) I wanted to easily control the media player using global hotkeys. I listen to music pretty much all the time when I'm sitting at the computer, and I wanted global hotkeys that worked from within games. There are plugins to do that for WinaAmp, but I wasn't happy with any of them. Foobar does it right out of the box.

      Everything else is a bonus. The volume thing is a bitch, though, I agree. That took me while to figure out, as well, and nearly made me uninstall the whole thing. The fact that there isn't a volume slider anywhere on the standard interface is a bit of a joke. But at least the volume is independent of the system volume - some players don't do that which is way more of a joke than the bad interface ever could be.

      Note that I didn't read any documentation ever when using foobar, as complex as the interface (the preference pane only, really) might be, I don't see how you'd need a manual for it...

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  12. iPod just shows up as a USB drive by wordisms · · Score: 1, Informative

    I might be wrong, but I believe an iPod just shows up as removable media when I connect it to my Windows machine via USB or FireWire. I can simply browse the drive, and copy and paste any files I like, music or not. Why is this new?

    1. Re:iPod just shows up as a USB drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can simply browse the drive, and copy and paste any files I like, music or not."

      That is true. However, by that way your music files won't show at iPod media library and thus you can't play them.

      ---
      Sorry, you failed to prove your humanity. To try again, you have to start over.

    2. Re:iPod just shows up as a USB drive by tjhorne · · Score: 0

      Are you referring to the Library within iTunes? All you have to do is import those music files into the library within iTunes. File > Add folder to library

  13. Isn't FM enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Ipod and so also and FM radio. I find it easier to follow the songs on fm as they do all the work for me else I need to keep choosing my songs and after a while get bored of that.

    Lazy BUM
    India

    1. Re:Isn't FM enough by thinkzinc · · Score: 1

      That's what shuffle is for!

  14. hmmm by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 4, Funny

    But isn't that illegal?
    You are going to make jesus cry.
    N

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  15. Bah by zaxios · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is hardly new nor interesting. There are plenty of programs that work with the iPod other than iTunes. Behold just a few:

    - Anapod Explorer

    - PodUtils

    - GTKpod

    - GNUpod

    And rhythmbox, for example, offers nice integration of music management and iPod operability -- if that's what is supposed to have made this newsworthy.

    1. Re:Bah by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've tried two of the utilities you mention (G*) and in each case gave up on getting them to function. I'm sure with enough time and fiddling it would have happened, but getting them to work wasn't high-enough priority for me to warrant putting in lots of time. If this new winamp thing "just works", no compilation/configuring involved, I would consider that a big step forward.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    2. Re:Bah by e03179 · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of that software. What makes this newsworthy is that I (and a lot of people around me) know (and probably use) Winamp.

      --
      -516
    3. Re:Bah by zapp · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the other comments to this, which were below my karma threshold, said pretty much the same thing...

      But it's common knowledge that other things support the iPod. So what. Anapod isn't free, gtkPod is kind of a POS and runs on Linux (but I use it), PodUtils is for OSX

      this one is significant because its FREE (as in beer and speech), and its for Winamp, another free (as in beer) tool, for windows.

      previously, there wasn't a good non-itunes tool for windows, outside of paying for anapod.

      --
      no comment
  16. I pod I nod by ishrat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ipod is a utility item everyone wants but how many of them use it?
    Ipod! Ipod
    I nod !
    I nod !
    and then I forgot!

    --

    There's always sufficient, but not always at the right place nor for the right folks.

  17. Direct link to homepage by Will+Fisher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is a direct link to the homepage for the winamp iPod plugin.

    We have many other features than just copy to hard drive, mlipod provides fully fledged iPod management. Go check it out!

    Will - Lead dev for mlipod

    1. Re:Direct link to homepage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you submit it?

    2. Re:Direct link to homepage by Will+Fisher · · Score: 1

      No I did not. If i did, I would have included a link to the homepage ;)

    3. Re:Direct link to homepage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is NO link to the source code for ml_plugin which is strange because it's hosted on SourceForge's servers...

    4. Re:Direct link to homepage by Will+Fisher · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get the source from the sourceforge CVS if you want. To compile it, you'll need the winamp SDK, avaliable in the winamp development section of http://forums.winamp.com/ Dump the source in \gen_ml\ml_ipod\ and it should work.

    5. Re:Direct link to homepage by DrBlubGut · · Score: 0

      I just wanted to say publicly, WOW. I installed last night on my main machine and was impressed but what just took the cake is sitting down at work and no longer needing to bounc speaker cables around to list to music on my Ipod.

      Thanks for setting me free from Itunes.

    6. Re:Direct link to homepage by PhotoBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Great work! I've been using EphPod for ages as it supports Winamp playlists but obviously this is even better, especially since it doesn't crash all the time like EphPod... ;)

      I'm glad there are more and more alternatives to iTunes, it's such a horrid program to use IMO.

    7. Re:Direct link to homepage by Emetophobe · · Score: 1
      I'm glad there are more and more alternatives to iTunes, it's such a horrid program to use IMO.
      While I'm all for having alternatives, may I ask what is wrong with iTunes? Alot of slashdotters seem to hate iTunes? I personally love it. I find it way easier to manage large amounts of mp3s, playlists and my iPod with it.
    8. Re:Direct link to homepage by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      My main problem with iTunes is how it likes to organise my music. I had a massive collection of MP3s long before iTunes came out and I organised my music into directories by type and by the name of the CD the music was from.

      iTunes however likes to move everything into its own special folder and organise the music by artist and album, which just doesn't work very well for me as the ID3 tags of my MP3s are eclectic to say the least thanks to the wildy varying submissions of people to the FreeDB. :)

      So normally I just go to the folder with the type of music I want and choose the folder with the mp3s I want and play them. With iTunes there's just a huge list of songs to scroll through. Admittedly I can narrow it by artist or album but first I have to know the name of one or the other assuming the ID3 tag is correct. I could take the time to fix them, but I have nearly 50Gb of music, audio books etc now and I just can't summon the will... ;)

      Another problem I have with iTunes is that it doesn't have a visible minimised mode. Winamp shrinks down to a discrete horizontal bar that I can set to "Always on top" and put at the top of my screen so I can access it anytime. iTunes doesn't have this, it's either the huge window or nothing which is annoying when I just want to hit pause or add a song to the playlist. I also find iTunes has a much bigger memory footprint compared to Winamp.

      My final problem is more of an "ethical" one I guess, in that I can't watch fullscreen movie trailers in Quicktime unless I have iTunes installed. What does iTunes do that allows Quicktime to go full screen? Quicktime used to be able to go full screen before iTunes came out but it magically lost this feature when iTunes was released. It just seems like a cheap way to force people into going the iTunes way. :(

    9. Re:Direct link to homepage by SPBesui · · Score: 1

      Can you copy songs from an iPod that was populated by a Mac? I read in the manual for my iPod mini that an iPod wouldn't work with both a Mac and PC. That didn't make much sense to me, but maybe it was just referring to the one-computer restriction.

    10. Re:Direct link to homepage by smatthew · · Score: 1

      That's odd. I'm using iTunes right now in minimized mode. And I set it to always on top. It's tough to do though. You've got to select "Switch to mini player" from the advanced menu, or type ctrl+M.

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
    11. Re:Direct link to homepage by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      My main problem with iTunes is how it likes to organise my music. I had a massive collection of MP3s long before iTunes came out and I organised my music into directories by type and by the name of the CD the music was from.

      Have you actually looked at the iTunes preferences?

      Under "Advanced", uncheck "Copy files to iTunes Music folder when adding to library". Just like magic, iTunes no longer rearranges your music files!

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    12. Re:Direct link to homepage by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Heh. Folders. I remember when I cared what folder my MP3's were in. Ah, the good old days...

      Genre tags and smart playlists are the ONLY way to fly.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:Direct link to homepage by Saige · · Score: 1

      So, any plans to update the plugin so as NOT to destroy the album cover images on an iPod photo whenever the iPod is updated/ejected through WinAMP? That's my first reason for not using the plugin.

      The other is that it destroys all my smart playlists, rendering them static.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    14. Re:Direct link to homepage by pizen · · Score: 1

      When you first connect the iPod to your computer if formats the drive based on your system. So if your PC can read HFS+ you can copy from a Mac iPod.

    15. Re:Direct link to homepage by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      Well I haven't used iTunes for ages so I can't remember if that was in there or not when I last tried it. So in the interests of fairness I installed the latest version and tried out the minimized mode. It's not bad but it's too "tall", I can't find anywhere to put it when I'm coding as it covers the controls of the IDE. Maybe when I get a monitor that does 1600x1200... ;)

    16. Re:Direct link to homepage by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      Well that's something they've improved since I last used it then. I just installed it and it actually asked during install if I wanted it to move my music or not. Last time I installed iTunes it started moving my music without even asking. I can't remember if the option not to copy music was there or not, I was too annoyed that it started copying things without even asking before.

      Apple have made some improvements but it's still not a patch on Winamp for me.

  18. dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this front page worthy, or even slashdot worthy?

    First of all, winamp is great, ipod is awesome. but,

    this plugin doesn't add anything you couldn't do in the first place. The wired article (yes I read it) gave one of the uses of this plugin for transferring songs from your work comp to your home comp via an ipod. I can do that already by zero compressing my songs into one big file, copying them to ipod and then to home computer. If I wanted to I could also run a crc checker on it to make sure nothing got corrupted along the way. something this plugin can't let you do.

    Secondly, this plugin is windows only. if it ran on macs and linux as well maybe it would then be front page worthy

  19. Yes, Winamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think my grandparents use to use that back in the early twentieth century.

    And yet, there's been no significant improvement over it since then. Pretty crappy showing, you youngsters.

    Maybe you should spend less time posting dumb comments and more time coding, like the oldsters did.

  20. Re:Who fucking cares? by nokilli · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And while I'm bleeding karma, how about this...

    Google is now tracking which search results you click on.

    Check it out for yourself.

    Don't be evil my ass.

  21. Re:fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like "About fucking time!"

  22. Piracy tool? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sorry, but how is this not just a blatant piracy tool?

    For what possible reason would I need to use this? My computer can always access the same music the iPod can, seeing as it came from the computer in the first place. My other machines can access the same music either through Bonjour music shares, or by connecting to the file server the files are actually stored on. If I ever lose the machine, I restore from my DVD-R backups. If I'm away from home, it's still not a problem, since that's the whole point of the iPod.

    The only use I can see for such a feature is to warez music off a friends iPod - the functionality is utterly redundant otherwise.

    1. Re:Piracy tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An easy way of backing up one's music collection, for those inevitable re-installs? Not that it couldn't be done before with plenty of other third party utilities.

      I suppose it's a convenient for winamp users.

    2. Re:Piracy tool? by anime_layer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well here in Switzerland it is perfectly legal to hand your iPod to a close friend and let him copy your music off it. You can freely copy copyrighted works between family members and close friends.

    3. Re:Piracy tool? by wpiman · · Score: 1
      In Switzerland it is also perfectly legal to launder drug/mob money through the banking system. Actually, it is encouraged.

      Don't get me wrong- I think a private banking system such as the one in Switzerland or the Caymans encourages personal freedoms in ways we could only dream about in the US and other parts of Europe. The same is true about copying music.

      The freedom's that are enjoyed in Switzerland are greater than the one's we have here in the US. Land of the free, home of the brave-- has simply become just a couple of lyrics.

    4. Re:Piracy tool? by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1
      Not sure how to address your message .. there are so many ways ...

      As per my previous post (in combination with several other folks' posts), tool is not needed to get the music off of an iPod. Tell Windows to show you all of the stuff it normally hides, or use a Mac OS X command line tool, and you can get to these files easily. So I guess, using your logic, that it would make the operating systems just as much of a blatant piracy tool. iTunes too, since it can be used to take the copied stuff and sort it into a nice directory structure for you.

      Second, it would be really nice to treat my iPod as a mobile hard drive. I rip music at home, but I'd like to have a copy of the mp3's at work so I can listen to them. It would be so nice if iTunes just let me copy off the files from the iPod onto another computer ... but thus far I haven't found an easy way to do this (inside of iTunes anyway). And when we start talking about large amounts of data (4 Gig for my iPod mini), it can be quite a bit to ask even a cable modem to transfer in a timely manner. It'd just be easier to bring the iPod into work and copy the music off via Firewire or USB - which is what I do. ;)

    5. Re:Piracy tool? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      It's an iPod. You can listen to it at work by putting your headphones on, switching it on, and pressing play.

      So again, in what way is this tool useful outside of pirating music?

      Yes, you can use the command line to do copy files off, but you can use a brick to break into a car. It isn't the primary purpose of those tools. Nobody in their right mind would bother, because they don't need to - they already have their music on their computer.

      This plugin sounds like the equivalent of an autopick, except there isn't any legal reason to use it.

    6. Re:Piracy tool? by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      So again, in what way is this tool useful outside of pirating music?


      Explain to me in simple english how it is useful for pirationg music. Do you mean by just allowing people to copy music from their IPods to their HDs? Why not use that logic to outlaw CD rippers, since they must contribute to piracy by allowing music to be copied to your computer.


      This plugin sounds like the equivalent of an autopick, except there isn't any legal reason to use it.


      Have your computer HD crash, then get back to me on that one.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    7. Re:Piracy tool? by omega9 · · Score: 1

      This plugin sounds like the equivalent of an autopick, except there isn't any legal reason to use it.

      Just because you can't envision a legal reason, must mean there isn't one, eh? Have you got a phone number or something I could call to get you to resolve all my other issues? Because you certainly seem to know wtf you're talking about.

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    8. Re:Piracy tool? by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1
      You're assuming I'm allowed to wear headphones when at my desk.

    9. Re:Piracy tool? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Well, one assumes that if you have music at work, you have some means of playing it back.

    10. Re:Piracy tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone has DVD-R backups. Those backups could just as easyly be seen as a Piracy tool. This one's better, because you don't have DVD-R backups. You just have your iPod.

    11. Re:Piracy tool? by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 1

      have you ever considered that people such as myself, dont want to have to bring my ipod to work everyday, when i can just store my music on my computer there? thats 100% legal... or maybe i want to avoid wear and tear on the ipods battery because whenever i plug in it recharges and i dont want it to recharge while im at work.... or even better consider that I want to have my headphones plugged into the computer so that i can hear important noises and such on it, such as mail arrived, or an alarm for a meeting...

      or maybe i just want to consolidate all of my music onto one computer to back it up so i can reset my ipod and not have to connect to all of my different laptops to upload various songs to it..
      i dont know about you but i dont like the command line in windows, it sux. yes i dont use winamp and wont use this tool, but thats because i can acomplish this inside itunes, but get this, i can see that others may find it useful regardless of whether i find it usefull..

      and before you say no one in their right mind would bother, perhaps you should try thinking a little bit first.. many of us nerds have MULTIPLE repeat MULTIPLE computers with music files scattered across each... I have a central musicbox, but on my two laptops i have a bunch of music as well becuase when on my laptops often dont have access to my server (since my server is only in my home, and my laptops are mainly used away from home) i like to have music on them to listen to so that i dont always have to break out my ipod while im on the computer.

      "except there isn't any legal reason to use it" wow, im curious, what in the world led you to that conclusion? and further more to share it with us?

      i didnt realize a brick was a tool, what is the primary purpose of the brick used as a tool? here i thought it was a material used for construction. maybe i should start carrying one of them in my tool box LOL

      and just for the record you can also break into the car with a coat hanger, the jaws of life, a key, a hammer, a jack hammer, a guy named jack, a coat hanger, a baseball, a golf club, another car, the kitchen sink, an ak47... and yet there is nothing illegal about any of it, as long as its YOUR car.. except for the ak47 firing it might not be legal where you are :-)

      --
      "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
      EdelFactor
  23. Newly released? by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 3, Informative

    A friend of mine has been using this plugin for months, and prefers to use it in favor of iTunes. It's hardly new though, the earliest release listed on their Sourceforge filelist is from April 2004.

    1. Re:Newly released? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I have been using it since November. Nothing new at all. However, it is an AWESOME piece of software, especially since I was already a Winamp fan.

    2. Re:Newly released? by scottme · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I installed and tried this (or something else very like it - an iPod-aware Winamp plugin) many months ago. And yes, it makes it easy to copy mp3s off the iPod by generating a filename from the tag data.

      But I gave up using it because it screwed up all the smart playlists on my iPod - turned them into simple dumb playlists with whatever content their last evaluation as smart lists had had. Pain in the butt having to recreate them all in iTunes. Perhaps this is a newer version without that bug - but I'll leave it up to others to check. Let me know, OK?

  24. Plug-In Useless by AlexTheBeast · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So you can move files off/on your iPod with this plug-in... you still can't play them any where else very easily!

    Sure they are a few techniques out there that sometimes (depending on how quickly it is patched) allows you to copy the DRM protected files... but you are still locked in with evil DRM.

    Copying the files around is not the problem, removing the DRM is the challenge.

    1. Re:Plug-In Useless by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      Google for jhymn.

    2. Re:Plug-In Useless by peragrin · · Score: 2, Informative

      only for AAC files. of which I have ~10 out of ~1700 songs. And the only reason why i bought those was because I drink pepsi, and got a bunch of free songs.

      Now I will keep my eye on Hymn and see if I can strip the drm from them straight.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Plug-In Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wired article covers this, but the plugin does integrate with hymn to allow removal of DRM as music is copied to your ipod. This allows you to keep your ipod a DRM free zone.

    4. Re: Plug-In Useless by FaramirTook · · Score: 1

      Only the songs from the iTunes Music Store are DRM'd. If you ripped it from a CD or got it by some P2P software, the files are exactly the same. A simple cp -R /Your_iPod_/iPod_Control/Music/ </ecode>

    5. Re:Plug-In Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My SoundBlaster Audigy card came with a program that lets me record what I hear regardless of the source. If it comes out of my speakers, I can get it - same bitrate. Keep it simple, stupid.

    6. Re:Plug-In Useless by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Those free songs are about as free as the people's republic of china, where you can express any oppinion as long as the commies agree with it.

  25. FYI about shuffles by The+Hobo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using this for a while, it works with Ipod Shuffles as well, just drag/drop, haven't tried any of the advanced features though

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    1. Re:FYI about shuffles by stevenharman · · Score: 0

      I've been using ml_ipod to help my girlfriend manage my her iPod Mini since around Dec '04, as well as my Shuffle (which I got just over a month ago). I had some trouble getting ml_iPod to work correctly with the Shuffle at first, but after some quick research and playing around, it works great. I also posted a "Lessons Learned" article here... hopefully it will help get you going.

      --
      90% of being smart is knowing what you're dumb at.
  26. When Will They Learn? by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People want to be able to use their music and their devices as they see fit and they will find a way to make that happen when companies try to cripple their otherwise good products. I bought my iPod thinking that it was probably locked down and the ability to transfer songs and files would be limited but I knew you people out there would fix the problem. It is annoying when locked down proprietary design locks the features down of a device I would otherwise buy and so I will look elsewhere when that happens -I'm looking at you Sony. (take your memory sticks and shove them) The iPod is popular despite it's attempted lockdown and they would do well to not follow the Sony example.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
    1. Re:When Will They Learn? by iainl · · Score: 1

      Given how simple it is to get the files off an iPod (cd to iPod_Control\Music on the drive it mounts as under Windows, then copy away to your heart's content), this strikes me as rather less about locking things down, and rather more about Apple's standard working method of not presenting things to the user that most users don't care about, and the few that do are probably savvy enough to get at it the hard way.

      The clever part in the plugin is that it updates the iPod's DB and Playlists to do UPloading without going via iTunes, should you have some sort of aversion to the program.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  27. Re:Who fucking cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You pissed off the joos no karma for you hee hee

  28. You can take music off it by simscitizen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OP is referring to the fact that you CAN take music off it, and clearly you've not done your research well in the slightest. Just use a program like ephpod.

    1. Re:You can take music off it by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Where can buy this ephpod software? I cant see it on the apple store anywhere. Oh wait you mean its not supported by apple. Strange that. My mp3 player came with all the software it needed - none.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  29. Lots of great programs... by jmcmunn · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are a ton of programs that already let you do this. Perhaps the coolest in my eyes is a program called SharePod which runs directly from the iPod hard drive, and so requires no installation. It is for Windows only, however, which is the only limitation.

    http://sturm.t35.com/sharepod/

    There are also about a dozen alternatives here, on iPodlounge.com

    http://www.ipodlounge.com/index.php/ipod-software/

    Kudos to the WinAmp guys for doing this though, I'll probably check it out to see how they did it.

  30. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can do what ever you want with your iPod.

    Just like zombo.com.

  31. A marginal improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for Windows iTunes users. I guess anything is better than the status quo, but I've always wondered why people even use that service. Given the choice between an onerous and costly Apple/RIAA sponsered scheme and/or downloading free MP3s et al (legal in my country - Canada) or simply buying the CDs, I just don't understand how anyone can choose the former. People apparently have noting better to waste their money on...

    In any case, can someone at least tell me how iTunes fits in with Apple's hip image? It's a sign of the times, I guess - everyone get in line, don't make a stink, and make sure the music you buy is DRM'ed.

    1. Re:A marginal improvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look stylish, appear the rebel, but functionally be a total fucking sheep (baaaaaaa). THAT, my friends, is the brave new world of the future. Ah well, being an individual was really too tough a row to hoe for the average person anyway. Get in LINE, COWARD.

  32. Re:FUD by Oldest+European · · Score: 1, Insightful

    they want to steal music from friends

    Dude, it's called sharing!

  33. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your going to steal music then your going to do it anyway, since when did directory structure matter? Music isn't going to be not-stolen just because you use the iTunes software.

  34. Re:Who fucking cares? by microbrewer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is Slashdot where Google can do no evil.

  35. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in summary, you like the way iTunes does it, others prefer how WinAmp does it, and you're VERY VERY ANGRY about it.

  36. :-) Mod parent up! by Tonik,+the · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up!

  37. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh... no. Imagine if you will that someone buys all of their CDs and transfers them onto their harddrive and their ipod. Then their harddrive dies. When they tried to sync their ipod with a new harddrive all of their mp3s are lost. Without the ability to copy back, the ipod loses its functionality as a backup source. I fail to see how piracy is in anyway involved with anything in this process.

  38. Mods by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Okay, he did seem a little worked upo about it but I don't think I'd call that a troll or flamebait.

    --

    The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
  39. Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    1) any iPod, if initialized using Windows (meaning it's FAT32 formatted), is a standard USB Mass Storage Device that you can plug into any windows box that supports those and start using it as a removable HDD

    2) nothing prevents you from downloading your DRM-free songs from your iPod using only Windows Explorer. However, iTunes arranges all music files in 32/64/128/256 (something like that) folders named 00 through FF (in hex). So your Metallica - St.Anger tracks would be scattered in some 10 folders or so... and it's not that easy to compile the whole album by hand. iPod uses its internal database to find files. All this winamp plugin provides is a convenient way to copy files from your iPod back to your hdd by parsing through this database file and renaming files using the template specified.

    This also means that you can not simply copy mp3 folder to iPod and play them... you have to update the database. This is why you have to use iTunes (or this winamp plugin or similar util) to upload music to your iPod player.

    Yes, it's stupid, compared to the way iRiver players handle files and folders.

    3) I've been using this plugin for about a year now, this is hardly news. I recommend NOT to use it to upload files to your iPod, it once corrupted its database and I had to erase it and copy all the music again.

    4) there is also a plugin for Total Commander (my shell of choice) that provides similar functionality:

    http://www.totalcmd.net/plugring/ipod.html

    1. Re:Reality Check by chriskenrick · · Score: 2, Funny

      For a minute there I wondered why you posted that as AC, rather than yourself. Then I noticed you implied voluntarily having Metallica's St Anger on your computer ;)

    2. Re:Reality Check by iainl · · Score: 1

      Given you've posted AC, you'll probably not see this but...

      How exactly does the iRiver do this, then? When I played with a friend's H340, we copied some tracks over, and I think you could only get at them through some routes and not others. I take it there's a "scan the drive and update the database" program you need to run seperately, then?

      Assuming that's the case, I'm not surprised Apple decided that its users didn't need to know about all that crap and just had iTunes do the database thing automatically.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Reality Check by Ill_Omen · · Score: 1

      Actually, iTunes itself will import the music on your iPod. The steps are really simple:

      1) locate the hidden "Music" folder on your mounted iPod.

      2) copy that folder to your hard drive. (I'm not entirely sure this step is necessary).

      3) make sure your iTunes is set to "keep my music library organized"

      4) drag the copied music folder into the iTunes Library window. iTunes will read the tags in your music files, rename them, and copy them to the correct place on your hard drive.

      Of course, this assumes you want to get *all* of the tracks off of your iPod. If you want a single track, that's harder.

  40. Wrong - well, partly anyway by CdBee · · Score: 4, Informative

    iTunes by default rips your Cds to non-protected m4u (AAC) or optionally, Mp3. Only tracks bought from the iTMS will be protected by default.

    I think this plugin is more intended as a utility to allow people to use their iPods to carry mp3s between PCs without the rigmarole of zipping them into an archive.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  41. Total Commander and Senuti could do this already. by Domini · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Total Commander can see the files on the iPod using this file system plugin. (link to download may be broken, but plugin can be found elsewhere...)

    TC is all you really ever need, and can replace explorer quite effectively with loads of added bonuses.

    I've also used a neat OS X util called Senuti (iTunes backward) to be able to copy from and to the iPod and do all sorts of other cool things.

    (Next to zsh and vi, it's the cheese!) ;)

  42. Ogg fails it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In double blind listening tests, users could still tell who the FUCKING NERDS touting Ogg were, as if they could tell the difference.

    1. Re:Ogg fails it by polyp2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ogg is not just about whether its better or worse sound quality than other codecs - that is open to opinion. In most cases some codecs are better at encoding certain things than others. The great thing about Ogg is that is open and not encumbered by patents, which most alternatives carry.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:Ogg fails it by Lurks · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The great thing about Ogg is that is open and not encumbered by patents

      The thing is though, right, who actually cares?

    3. Re:Ogg fails it by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      No-one who matters.

  43. Laptop -- PC Sync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what I use EphPod for. There are times when my laptop and my PC have different music sets because I bought a CD while on vacation or something. Rather than re-rip, I just download from my iPod.

  44. ARCHOS by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0, Informative

    Thats why I got an Archos.... NO limitations AND its a MP4 encoder/player, voice recorder and digital camera. 3.1 MegaPixil. Oh yeah, and its NOT based on that damed Windows Portable Media Center crap.

  45. Re:Piracy tool? - I'll bite the troll hook. by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

    I got pissed off because the little iriver player I had woudln't let me copy mp3's off of it to my hard drive when I upgraded its firmware to a newer version. It sucked because I wanted to use it to copy music from my house to my computer up at work. I have a fast internet connection, but it is for customers and research, not downloading music or streaming shoutcasts.

    I don't have a portable music player now. I just copy my stuff to CD if I want to listen to it on my computer. It's annoying, but they aren't too expensive anymore.

  46. Umm.. by sinikal · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why is this informative? There is a checkbox in iTunes that lets you use an iPod the same way.

    I pity you fools and your shiny blue screens!

  47. Re:Wrong - well, partly anyway by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1

    Zipping into an archive???
    On Windows, enable "View Hidden Files" and you can browse, explore, and copy the music folders at you leisure. It's how I copy music from home to work.

  48. Re:We tried working with Winamp... by stuffisgood · · Score: 1

    Hahahaha!

    Awesome troll there!

  49. this isn't new by behindspace · · Score: 0

    I'v ebeen using this since last year, and if by slashdot posting this as news this stops the progress of this plugin, I'll be bullshit. I love my iPod, but I despise iTunes, this plugin made my life so much easier, because WinAMP PWNS!

    1. Re:this isn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'You'll be bullshit'? You must be the guy that provides translation services to the Japanese game industry...

    2. Re:this isn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure are NOTHING BUT bullshit.

  50. No more cluncky iTunes by se7en11 · · Score: 1
    Hooray! I never much liked iTunes. It appears people are having trouble understanding that you're not simply copying music to an external harddrive. (i.e. the iPod) You have to get that music to show up in a playlist within the iPod. That is why we need iTunes. Sort of like middleware for the iPod.

    As a sworn user of Winamp since back during the 1.x, I'll defiantly d/l a copy.

    Link to winamp download: http://winamp.com/plugins/details.php?id=138888

    1. Re:No more cluncky iTunes by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Winamp 2.9 was the last good version, and it looks like this plugin only works with Winamp 5.x. I stopped using Winamp years ago when it turned from an mp3 player to an everything under the sun audio video player.

    2. Re:No more cluncky iTunes by toddestan · · Score: 1

      While Winamp 3 was a mess, what Winamp 5 does is based upon what plugins you have installed. Try Winamp Lite. The download is less than 1MB, and it's pretty much the basic music player that Winamp 2 was. Though, Winamp Lite does not come bundled with the OGG plugin if I remember right.

    3. Re:No more cluncky iTunes by se7en11 · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I tend to use 5.x at work where I've got a nice machine that an handle the extra load. At home, I stick with the 2.x (forgot actual version)

      What do you use now instead of Winamp for your MP3s?

  51. Grandparent just used Winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My grandparents have used ml_iPod for the last two years. It's hardly new like the original post claims.
    It's recently included a lot of new features, but it's hardly new.

    1. Re:Grandparent just used Winamp? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      I ain't no grandpa, but I've used ml_iPod since I bought my iPod last summer. The only thing new is the 1.2 release and Wired picking up the story. Pretty much anything that's not iTunes will let you pull songs off the iPod. Ephpod (free beer) and Anapod Explorer (shareware) both let you do it. Thanks to Ephpod, Winamp + ml_iPod, and Quicktime Alternative, I can say no thanks to iTunes.

  52. Re:FUD by Travelsonic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Your wrong, it's copyright infringement.

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  53. Re:We tried working with Winamp... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    yes yes, 2nd troll of the same kind I catch this week, you can look at the other here

    I bet this Troll has a template =o)

    I did not get the URL of a third one I read before... but these two are saved for future reference =o)

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  54. Re:FUD by Travelsonic · · Score: 0
    *groan*

    It is not theft!


    Copying files is just that - copying. Why is it that people are using euphimisms to discribe copying that have absolutely nothing to do with copying in the first place


    Piracy isn't good, but calling copying theft makes it even more confusing.


    Explain to me why again it is wrong to rip your music off the IPod back on the computer again? What about HD crashes, or the [music] files on the computer being accidentally deleted?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  55. Re:fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> fucking nerds

    > I wish someone would be. :-(

    Derek, meet Bubba...

  56. It's not broken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You *can* get around this if you want. They just haven't put an automatic feature in iTunes. Why?

    Think, really think, about what would happen if iTunes had simple functionality to move files back onto the hard-drive.

    You'd go to all your friends and plug your iPod into each of their computers. They'd plug each of their pods into yours.

    Given a normal group of five friends, you would have pirated perhaps five thousand songs in the space of fifteen minutes.

    No company that's actually involved in selling music can afford to make a player that transfers music off the drive as easily as iTunes transfers it on.

    Remember too that my estimate is based on current library sizes... if you could do this, pretty soon everyone's library would be the size of the average iPod, which is about 30 GBs right now.
    Insanity.

    So in the end, this is a fairly reasonable restriction. You can actually copy the music back off if you care enough, but they're also not selling the world's single most effective piracy device which would eliminate the music market in about ten weeks.

    Someone will eventually make a popular player that syncs both ways, just plug it in and go. It's going to be a fun mess.

    1. Re:It's not broken... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Except that every other mp3 player can do this.

      In fact, they make MP3 players that are nothing more than something you can plug a USB drive into.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  57. Still whips the llamas ass. by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    But of course, I still have no idea WTF that means.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  58. Mod parent and parent UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They speak the truth

  59. Re:Wrong - well, partly anyway by iainl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course you can. It's just that some people find the fact that the filenames and subdirectories are structured to be fast and efficient for the player that keeps track info in a seperate database file, rather than easily human readable. Winamp (and indeed anything else) reads the intact header info on the files to get that for you.

    There's really a sliding 'geek' scale that goes something like this:

    0: doesn't care what they look like on disc, as going looking for the files directory is magic voodoo stuff.

    1: annoyed that the filenames are munged up, making it useless for most purposes.

    2: not that bothered, since they can work around it with the id3 tags. However, possibly irritated that they should have to anyway.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  60. Recovering after wiped hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most legitimate use is for if your hard drive got erased and you don't have back ups (for what ever reason, not everyone makes backups like you). In such a situation its highly unlikely Apple will refund your money/replace all your music, but you still have the songs in your ipod. i guess it should be legal to allow you to recover them

  61. not a new plug in. by duran.goodyear · · Score: 1

    What I love is that this plug in is far from new, I've been using it for close to a year now. I think its called research, yeah, that you know, you do before you write a news story...

  62. Re:Piracy tool? - I'll bite the troll hook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just replace the firmware with the old version, very easy on the Iriver, it's just a .hex file that lives in the root of the drive. I've hacked my IRiver to pieces and back again, worked out the addresses and op codes in the file and got it doing all sorts of fun stuff. Amazing how much fun you can have with just a hex editor and some patience. Download a copy of your previous IRiver firmware and load it in or look about on the net for the many 'customised' .hex files that are out there which solve your copy problem.

  63. But does it support Speex? by cduffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, I'm not joking. I occasionally want voice recorder functionality, and just about everyone seems to use some proprietary format or another for their hardware -- while Speex gets compression rates with the best of them, and works on all the platforms I use.

    Once upon a time I might have bought a player with Vorbis support -- but my money's gotten tighter since then, so my requirements have gone up. Where's the dedicated hardware with Speex support?

    1. Re:But does it support Speex? by amliebsch · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What's wrong with recording to mp3?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:But does it support Speex? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with recording to mp3?

      Compared to Speex (and other speech-specific, dedicated codecs), MP3s are extremely high bitrate. Further, given that I'm going to want to store my voice recordings in a compact form, I'm going to be converting them to Speex eventually anyhow... so it just plain makes sense to encode to Speex in the first place and avoid the artifacts from using multiple layers of lossy encoding.

      To give you an idea of what I mean by "extremely high bitrate" -- speex starts at 2 kbps and tops out at 44 kbps for the ultra-wideband version; quality at 8kbps is quite good, and is what I use for my phone system. Sure, it doesn't effectively represent anything but human speech -- but that it does extremely well.

  64. Not new... by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
    I've been doing this forever. I run Linux on my main machine, but use my old Win98 laptop with the Winamp plugin to send my stuff to my iPod. Don't have time to mess around with the iPod in Linux right now (hhaha but ironically, i have time to check slashdot today).

    Here's the Win98 iPod USB driver that I use to get it to talk to the Winamp plugin.

    --
    Berto
  65. pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the plugin works pretty good. the problem is that WimAmp sucks ass at reading id3v2.4 tags created by iTunes.

    1. Re:pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IOW, their proprietary extension to the ID tag spec? Oh well, it's only a matter of time till a plug in made...

    2. Re:pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it is Apple's ID3v2.4 tag formating that sucks ass.

  66. Danger, Will Robinson! by neflyte · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I used this product for a while last year until one sunny day my iPod refused to show me any playlists. I mounted the iPod as a disk and took a look around...sure enough the music was all still there. iTunes wouldn't see my music, the iPod wouldn't see my music...not even ml_iPod itself would see my music. ml_iPod had corrupted my iPod database.

    When I tried to leave forum posts to the creator for support, he was nowhere to be found. I discovered that many other users also shared my hardships. I had to download EphPod and use its recovery features to even get the iPod to show me anything. I then had to further download Anapod Explorer and use its recovery features to recover a bunch of 'lost' music. Since that day, I have vowed to myself to never use the ml_iPod plugin again.

    FWIW, I have my doubts that something like this won't happen again. Be cautious people...you're putting your iPod database at risk!

    My $0.02

    --
    "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals. I'm a vegetarian because I hate plants." -- A. Whitney Brown
    1. Re:Danger, Will Robinson! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh NOES (insert Drth Vager howl here), not my IPOD DATABASE. BTW, could you be any more pedantic in your use of the language ("I then had to further download...". You neglected to insert a "subsequently" or two in there for full lame-o effect.). You MUST be a Mac user... Right? Lame...

    2. Re:Danger, Will Robinson! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you said, you are not the only one. I, too, lost all references to my music. No biggie--until it happened again. I stopped using this plugin, and the problem has gone away.

    3. Re:Danger, Will Robinson! by neflyte · · Score: 1

      well, the way i see it...if i'm not pedantic - at least to some degree - then someone (like yourself) will complain that I most likely failed english class (which i didn't) or that i'm a 13-year-old script kiddie who doesn't know their way around a computer (which i'm not). likewise, if i _am_ pedantic - again, to some degree - I get comments from people (again, like yourself) that I'm some kind of Mac user (which I am, on occasion) or some kind of general lamer (which i've been known to be, on occasion).

      so, i'm damned if i do, and i'm damned if i don't. i'll take 'damned if i do' for $200, alex. :)

      --
      "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals. I'm a vegetarian because I hate plants." -- A. Whitney Brown
  67. You CAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    copy music OFF you ipod. Just like you CAN organice music easily using folders and playlists in winamp.

    Sure Apple doesn't make it a default feature of iTunes. But hey, with winamp nothing seems to be default.
    It's not as imposible as the iPod haters would have you belive, it's just not standart. And since when does something not being standart make it imposible?

    1. Re:You CAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my fucking GOD. Spell check is your friend, you inarticulate idiot, look into it...

  68. Sounds like someone can't afford one by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    You know what would annoy the hell out of me? Having to manually manage the music on my music player. With iTunes and a few smart playlists, it automatically puts things on there that I would be putting on there manually. (And the second purpose of this is to have a backup of your player music.)

    I have smart playlists set up as such, that always synchronize with the iPod every time I connect it to the 'puter:
    1) A playlist that always has the latest 2gb of music I've added to my library
    2) A playlist that consists of any songs I've rated 4 or 5 stars (note that ratings carry over from either the iTunes player or via the iPod interface)
    3) An "audition" playlist of a random selection of 2gb of music from my library that I haven't listened to yet (playcount = 0)
    4) A playlist of all music in the dance/techno/electronic genre, for working out
    5) A playlist of just jazz
    Etc. What a hellish task it would be to have to manually update these categories on a non-iPod music player.

    iPod is not alone. Don't forget that the real power is the iPod + iTunes combo. And I think it's pretty damn amazing.

  69. this is new? by nilbog · · Score: 1

    I must have the time travel plugin also, since I've had the ipod plugin for months now...

    --
    or else!
  70. not on my computers, it doesn't.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not running WinShite. Is there a version for OS X, or FC3?

  71. WTF!?!?! by Total_Wimp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't normally reply in this fashion to my own posts, but this is ridiculous. I just had one comment marked flaimbait and one marked redundant in the same thread. Come on man, these posts are legitimate criticism.

    Marking something down simply because you happen to disagree with it doesn't even come close to fitting the moderators guidelines. You are not helping to win me over to your cause with this kind of zealotry.

    TW

    1. Re:WTF!?!?! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      You said something bad about Apple. That'll always get you modded down, trust me, been there before.

    2. Re:WTF!?!?! by radish · · Score: 1

      It is not possible to have a sensible discussion about Apple on Slashdot. FWIW I agree, I don't like iTunes and I don't want to use it (and that's one of the main reasons I don't have an iPod). But my GF does have one, because she likes pink mp3 players (don't ask) and so I have to figure out how the hell to get music from our collections synced up. Grrrrr.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  72. On OS X... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there are a host of programs for extracting music from iPods. The one I prefer is iPodRip.

    You can find it and the others at VersionTracker.

  73. huh? by cryptoz · · Score: 1

    gtkpod has been doing this for...years! So, if AOL comes out with something that's already exsist, it's news? Wow, what is our world coming to...

  74. Re:Wrong - well, partly anyway by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3: not bothered at all; thinks id3 is the right way to do it anyway due to cross platform filename hiccoughs.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  75. No Need for an Extra Program by stuver · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can download from you iPod by doing the following:

    1. Set your iPod for use as a hard drive.
    2. Make the music directories on the hard drive visible (they are default hidden). You can do this by making visible the folder iPod_Control and clicking on "Apply changes to this folder, subfolders and files".
    3. Set iTunes to keep your music organized (a.k.a. copy them to your hard drive).
    4. Go to Files>Add Folder to Library and add the music folder on the iPod.

    This may take a little time if you have lots of music, but it will only copy the music that you do not already have.

  76. Not really new by g8oz · · Score: 1

    The ml_ipod plugin has been out for a while now. I'm surprised it took so long for people to notice it. I've been using to manage my Ipod mini and it works great. Its good for a lot more than copying songs to a hard drive. Its a complete iTunes replacement.

  77. Question about the iPod and iTunes... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    I gather that officially you are not supposed to be able to copy music off the iPod.

    My question is whether that only applies to music you buy from iTunes or to all music, even stuff you legally rip yourself?

    If it applies to your own MP3 collection, I'm shocked there has not been more outrage about this. What right does Apple have to restrict how you use YOUR music?!

    If it does not apply to your own MP3 collection, then it appears that Apple has at least some sense, which is rare in corporate America today.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Question about the iPod and iTunes... by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "I gather that officially you are not supposed to be able to copy music off the iPod."

      If that applies to my music (that I wrote, performed, recorded, and reserve all rights to), the legal shoe is on the other foot.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  78. Plugin by casualsax3 · · Score: 0

    I've been using this since I got my iPod, it's very well designed and makes transferring files from the media library a breeze. I know it's kind of a big deal that it can take files back off, but in reality I haven't found it to be particularlly useful. Using the iPod you need to have the cord with you at all times, then the end machine needs the plugin... it's doable of course... I've found my DVD burner to be faster and easier to transfer music with though.

  79. *we're* losers? by bobalu · · Score: 1

    Let me see if I get this straight, you can't afford to buy a decent MP3 player and WE'RE losers?

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:*we're* losers? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I get this straight, you can't afford to buy a decent MP3 player and WE'RE losers?

      I could probably afford an ipod or similar tpye device but I want an mp3 player that I can take anywhere. I don't feel comfortable taking a device that costs 250 pounds (british) whereas my 50 pound flash player I will happily carry with me and leave it in my jacket (where I wouldn't an Ipod). Plus flash devices are more durable than hd ones.

  80. Blue Man Group by MexicanMenace · · Score: 3, Funny

    Intel didn't release the Blue Man Group. They escaped on their own using an elaborate, yet pleasant sounding series of PVC-lined tunnels.

  81. WinAmp? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

    I think the real news here is that people are still using WinAmp.

    Wow, that takes me back.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  82. Alternate Steps by Chyeld · · Score: 1

    Use one of the many iTune clones, most of which are free and/or open source, which can read and write to the iPod's music database and the steps go like this:

    1. Import a CD to your music library.
    2. Plug in your iPod.

    Amazingly, just as simple, and not tied to that nasty ol'apple guy.

    Me though, for now I'll use iTunes. The only real advantage I see to not using iTunes is to be able to brag to people that I'm not using iTunes... not exactly a big selling point to me.

  83. Re:LINUX USERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex with multiple partners really is "everything it's cracked up to be."

    Yeah, I like using both hands too.

  84. OH NOES, TEH CONSPIRACY!!!!112321111onetwo11!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick, cover yourself and your house in tinfoil NOW, and stop using the internet!

  85. iPod Rip by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
    Will take music from your ipod on the mac so you can back them up to DVD or CD in case your comuter hard drive dies. get it here

    Ephpod will allow windows users the same ability. get it here!

    Ephpod runs pretty well under wine.

    Yes I know apple doesn't include that ability in iTunes. But that just leaves opportunities open for third party apps. The RIAA can now be more at ease with Apple and can concentrate on suing their customers. I'll bet the number of people who download mp3's and don't own CD's of any music is pretty slim. Lawsuits can only make people more determined not to get caught.

  86. iTurds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still people that use iTurds?

    Wow, it is news if people are actually using that bloatd POS.

    1. Re:iTurds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it is news if people are actually using that bloatd POS.

      And yet, it's Winamp 5 that has the "feature" of allowing you to independently adjust the transparency of each of it's 5+ windows. Bloat? Naw!

  87. It's easy to get the songs off anyway... by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... at least as long as the songs didn't come from the Apple store. All of mine are ripped from CD's or vinyl to MP3.

    The iPod's Music folder is hidden only in the Finder. On a Mac you can still get to it easily enough via the shell or an alternative file browser; go here:

    /Volumes/[iPod's name]/iPod_Control/Music/

    There are a bunch of folders with names like "F00", "F01", "F02" .. up to "F49" on mine. The MP3's are under these folders. The filenames and ID's are still intact, so it'd be easy to import them all into another program.

    If you want a nice GUI tool to do this, on Mac there is "iPod Access" and "iPodRip" (both shareware), and there is the free program "gtkpod", which I use on my Linux box at work to listen to my iPod songs.

    Apple really doesn't lock you out of your iPod, which is one reason why I love it! Of course, mine's HFS+ formatted; is it hard to do this on Windows?

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
  88. Piece of junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On installing this plug-in, it formatted my iPod, deleting all my music. And after closing Winamp and relaunching, it no longer works. Wahoo.

  89. yeah, I can understand that. by bobalu · · Score: 1

    That's why I don't have a $500 cell phone.

    I would've stuck with the Creative Nomad because it had great battery life, then it died on me. But I have to say, if you're going to carry one around the iPod has a much better form factor. The rectangular size difference is large, but it's really the depth that helps so you can keep it in your pocket. Of course, mine was closer to $250US.

    What makes the price in the UK so high, the VAT?

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:yeah, I can understand that. by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1


      What makes the price in the UK so high, the VAT?


      Fuck knows mate, prices in dollars tend to get converted to straight into pounds. Look up "rip off britain".

  90. *SIGH* How quickly people forget... by DLWormwood · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If it applies to your own MP3 collection, I'm shocked there has not been more outrage about this. What right does Apple have to restrict how you use YOUR music?!

    I've already mentioned this before, and it looks like I'm going to have to mention it again. It was not Apple's original idea to "prevent" music uploading from MP3 players, but it was the natural result of two factors:

    1. iTunes was originally a third-party sound player called SoundJam, which was originally made to work with players like the Diamond Rio. The original Rios, being very small capacity propretary flash devices, didn't have the circuitry and UI to handle uploading files back to a host computer.
    2. The RIO was challenged in US court by the RIAA as encouraging piracy, but the court found in favor of Diamond partly because the RIAA's argument made no sense for a device that couldn't upload, only download.

    Apple's continued "hiding" of the song files from the rest of the file system is simply legal cover to defend themselves from the RIAA. Do you really think Apple could have gotten the Music Store off the ground if the iPod more openly supported uploading?

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    1. Re:*SIGH* How quickly people forget... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry I missed your earlier posting. I should have looked around for an answer before posting myself. And I thank you for your time in posting an answer and an explanation.

      Well, that really sucks. I can easily see why Apple would want to keep iTunes music from being copied off, but to prevent all such music from being copied makes no sense. Especially since nearly ever other portable music player allows it.

      I'm guessing it was a part of the deal they had to accept from the recording industry to get iTunes off the ground.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  91. Easy Copy by veezhun · · Score: 1

    The search feature in windows is beautiful for this. Just go to search, point it to the removable ipod, make sure the setting to search in hidden folders is on, search the string "" *.mp3 "" and voila, it will list all the mp3's in the ipod. Now just copy all with Ctrl-A and paste it whereever u want. cheers!!!!

  92. Re:We tried working with Winamp... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    this seems to have become quite the in troll recently. some versions seem to have more variation from the original that others but they are generally pretty easy to recognise

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  93. Hot Damn by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    I am sure glad that I have not given up on Slashdot...I for now will throw out all of my non-drm riddled mp3 players and get a hip (even to the anti-hip) iPod if I can really copy songs from it.

    Take that all you sucky competitors to Apple -- let's see me be able to copy songs of off your antiquated ugly big ole' non hip-DRM'less shells.

    Next thing you guys are going to tell me is that I can actually print from my screen to some automatic ink sucking gadget....Goodbye sore hands and high pencil bills. Long live /.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  94. Re:FUD by network23 · · Score: 1

    "Imagine if you will that someone buys all of their CDs..."

    I guess there's always the "imagine" when you don't have any real arguments...

  95. Snore by Mattz.Mcpherson · · Score: 1

    And Ml_pod has been able to do this for well over a year. Whoop de frick. Also it takes the knowledge of turning on "Show Hidden files and folders" to copy music manually off your pod. I bought an iPod cause a friend told me they were decent players. It had a nice capacity and it connected by firewire which was helpful in my ailing USB situation. I didn't see the adverts, see celebrities wearing them or any of that. I bought it cause I wanted to listen to my music and it had a recommendation.

  96. knock knock, cant we already do this w/ itunes? by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 1

    I don't know what all the commotion is about, and how any of you claim you cant get music off of your ipod onto your computer
    but who ever thinks so is sadly mistaken... Not only can it be easily accmplished without ANY SOFTWARE AT ALL, but you can do it inside itunes, and in under 6 mouse clicks (depending on how your prefernces are set)....

    If you turn on the option to have iTunes automatically copy music into your itunes music folder all you have to do is plug in your ipod, click file->add folder to library, and then browse to your ipod and add the control folder to the library... In a matter of minutes (depends on how much you have on there obv) everything will be copied physically onto your hard drive.. thats it

    Suppose your on linux or windows and dont wanna use itunes for whatever reason, just make sure that hidden folders are visible and copy the folder /ipod_control/music to desired location. Done that's it. Heck if you're on linux its even easier you should be able to deduce the two commands needed to do the entire job... (a mount command.. and "cp /ipod_control/music/* / -r"

    It really boggles my mind that people a. cant figure that out. b. complain you cant do it. and c. bother with other useless audio players (see winamp, althouh i was a HUGE winamp fan in the pre itunes days, and for music i still think its infintely better than windows media player!) or seperate utilties entirely to do it..

    So either im really confused as to what you people are talking about in which case I'll go run into a wall a couple of times and force myself to watch an ep of the simple life (that should be punishment enough) .... or maybe, just maybe, I might have something here, feel free to let me know either way

    --
    "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
    EdelFactor