Slashdot Mirror


Fox to Purchase Myspace

jagger writes "News Corp announced on Monday that it has bought Intermix Media, owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, for $580 million. This follows an announcement by News Corp on Friday that it is creating an Internet division to hold the company's sports, news and entertainment sites." Update: 07/19 2:40EDT by C :Sorry about the copy errors, folks. They have been fixed.

218 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Fixed link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  2. In other news... by PortWineBoy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    always use that pesky "preview" button.

    --

    this sig deleted by another sig

    1. Re:In other news... by donutz · · Score: 1

      always use that pesky "preview" button.

      Is that bit of advice for regular Slashdot readers or for the Slashdot editors?

    2. Re:In other news... by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1

      also, don't replace verbs with a comma.

    3. Re:In other news... by infonography · · Score: 1

      'Preview' is for Users (typos)
      'Older Stuff' is for editors. (Dups)

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  3. Nice job editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you even READ these articles?

    1. Re:Nice job editors... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Ob. Monty Python: The people responsible for sacking the copy editors have been sacked.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. Fox owns me? by krautcanman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I typically don't have anything wrong with Fox, but to allow them access to my personal information? I don't think so...

    1. Re:Fox owns me? by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust them to be "fair and balanced" with my personal information either....

    2. Re:Fox owns me? by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      Right, and just about everything else you enter is publically available anyways.

    3. Re:Fox owns me? by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      Could be fodder for new Fox reality shows, something to jump-start the writers.

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    4. Re:Fox owns me? by digitalgroove · · Score: 1

      If not Fox than someone else. Your personal information and the illusion of its safety are simply running into the reality of the corporate world. If you don't like it, don't use the service. It's plain and simple: $$ talks...

  5. Honestly by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    Is it THAT hard to check your submission for broken code?

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  6. When will they broadcast on the internet? by hiss · · Score: 1

    It will be great when they start broadcasting the sports they have rights to on the net. Sports is one of the biggest drivers in HDTV and would be a huge driver in Internet tv as well.

  7. ok... by rainmayun · · Score: 5, Funny

    have the moderators been replaced by a drinking bird that just clicks "Post"???

    1. Re:ok... by Nytewynd · · Score: 1, Funny

      Uh oh. The Springfield Power Plant didn't last very long like that. How will /. survive?

      --
      /. ++
    2. Re:ok... by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      ..drinking bird..
      Soooo close! The drinking bird theory was an inside joke spread by the /. editing team to describe Zonk, the narcoleptic who just happens to sit with his nose aligned with the enter key. Witness the moniker, baby.

    3. Re:ok... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      And if so, could I get one of those drinking birds to click refresh on the Slashdot homepage for me? It'd really boost my productivity.

    4. Re:ok... by cortana · · Score: 1

      The drinking bird broke last week. The system has been modernised by switching to using yes(1).

  8. Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    a

    href="nice">editting.

    1. Re:Good Job! by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      I know Taco has said that the choice of the word "editors" to describe the editors was a bad decision, but if you don't pick up on and fix a mistake like this, that's just plain negligence.

  9. Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular site? by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Proper link:

    It has bought Intermix Media, owner of Myspace.com, the fifth most-viewed internet domain in the US and owner of other sites for $580m.

    When I saw this on Google News this morning, I was shocked to know that there was a domain out there that I have never visited yet it's the fifth most popular out there.

    Why would other people be going to such a large site but not me? When I checked it out this morning I realized that it's nothing more than a "good looking" spam webportal.

  10. Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by Nurseman · · Score: 5, Funny

    And will MySpace become fair and balanced ? :-)

    --
    Save a Life. Donate Blood. Please.
    1. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by sponga · · Score: 1

      No, it will still be "the most ridiculous item of the day"

    2. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Considering that most MySpace users I know are college freshman maintaining online friendships with chums out of town and that they are all left wing this will be interesting.

    3. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by PaxTech · · Score: 1

      Fox isn't necessarily right-wing. They just found an underserved section of the market and filled it. From what I understand, in China the Rupert Murdoch owned TV stations are the most pro-communist government leaning, because that's the viewpoint that was underserved in that market. It's just good business.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    4. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's not a whole lot of contradiction between being pro-Chinese-communist-government and the kind of spin Fox News pushes in the US, actually.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      So they are pro status quo that is even worse. Without the formation of dissent allowed with freedom of speech in any form of government that allows it the ideals of a citizen become narrow and focused on a majority idealogy usually run by some sort of religious fundamentalism. I would consider maoism a religion.

    6. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I used to think LiveJournal was the shithole of the internet. How I've realized it's more like the taint. MySpace is more like the shithole. I think it's hilarious that all the douchebags that create these "look at me and how cool I am!" pages filled with a thousand animations and background sounds and wav files and ridiculous background images and pretentions photos of themselves and their "friends" are now going to be contributing to the pockets of Rupert Murdoch.

      That it made half a billion dollars just goes to show that you don't need a brilliant idea to become rich on the internet. You just need to appeal to the lowest common denominator. Christ, I can't believe the hamster dance site didn't sell for ten billion dollars, since every git in the world got off on it.

      More importantly, whatever happened to building and running a website or internet/computer service for the enjoyment of it? It seems like everyone (including slashdot) just build up websites, attract lots of people and then sell it off. Not that there's anything inherently wrong with that, but... WHY?!

      I've been offered significant amounts of cash (not millions though) to sell my auction site which I've operated for more than six years. Could I take the money, give up the site and go buy a house with it? Sure. But I don't run the site for money. I dont' charge anything for the site. I don't make anything from the site. And I'm not about to sell the community out for some cash to a bunch of people who will commercialize it (because why would you pay a bunch of money for a site unless you were going to commercialize it?).

      It's depressing that the internet has just become a cashcow of half-assed ideas. Do it for the love or don't do it at all.

    7. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by PaxTech · · Score: 1

      They're not pro-status-quo. They're pro-making-money. If there weren't a ton of media outlets that slam the status quo they'd be doing that instead, because that would be the underserved market.

      Don't you see that Fox *is* dissenting? They dissent from the prevailing media atmosphere, whatever that is. because that's where the money is. They have no ideology beyond making money. It's more than you can say for the BBC or CNN.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    8. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      most pro-communist government leaning,

      Right, so Rupert Murdoch is a fascist and a big control freak. He supports whatever group allows him the most power. In the US, he supports Bush. In China, he supports the Communists. There's really no disconnect here.

      There's nothing new here.

    9. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by PaxTech · · Score: 1

      Wrong. He's a big *money* freak. If running a capitalist promoting station in China and a communist one in the US was the way to make the most money, then that's what he'd do.

      It's not about ideology, it's about ratings, and it's only about ratings because ratings = profit. Have you seen FoxNews ratings vs. CNN lately? That Murdoch is a hell of a businessman. ;)

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    10. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Don't you see that Fox *is* dissenting?

      I'll disagree with some of your points. They simply take the prevailing media atmosphere to an extreme. They refined the process, focus on stories better, have very good marketing, and run with it. Because you're right-- that's where the money is.

      CNN has never been liberal. The liberal news outlets are all pretty darn small, and are constantly flirting with bankruptcy, because that's where the money isn't.

    11. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's about money.

      But supporting the people in control is often the best way to make money. Dissent is rarely profitable.

    12. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yes, because someone wants to buy a website, pay the website creator for it, continue paying them to continue working on it, leave all creative control and decisions to that person... all out of the goodness of their own heart. No ulterior motives at all. No intention to reap money from it or commercialize it.

      See. You're maybe missing the point. Doing it and getting paid doesn't make it right to turn your membership into a bunch of money-giving sheep.

    13. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by PaxTech · · Score: 1

      Of course CNN doesn't seem liberal to you, Mr. EnronHalliburton2004, because you're probably to the left of Castro and Stalin. ;)

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    14. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      Apparently yes. They've already started censoring bulletins at least. A bulletin my SO wrote that only said "fox owns myspace" and had a copy&paste of section TOS 5.c. was deleted. Then after she tried to post a bulletin a few times her account was suspended. After her account was out of suspension she couldn't post any bulletins with both the words "myspace" and "fox" in them. Funny that they email is down for maintenance now :D... I know, that's not fair, everything goes down for maintenance all the time at myspace. Also apparently some people with massive friend lists who also posted bulletins criticizing fox have completely lost their accounts.

      I submitted an account cancellation but I have to wait on an email to confirm it. haha.

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
    15. Re:Will the internet zone now stop "spinning" ? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      I'm not liberal. I'm a moderate. It's just that the rest of the country has moved to the right. :)

      And well, I consider Stalin to be the same sort of fascist dictators as Hitler & Pinochet. Castro is a little more tollerant, even if he is a controling fucker.

      And Bush, Nixon, etc. come nowhere close to that extreme. I don't agree with what some of the extreme leftists say, and I sometimes defend Bush to (hard to believe).

  11. A new low for Slashdot editors by mOoZik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the hell is it that you guys are responsible for, anyway? Obviously you don't check for dupes, spelling, grammar, relevance of links, and now, you don't even check to see whether or not the blurb even makes sense and if the links therein are functional! It's like watching the Roman Empire of tech/OSS sites crash and burn...

    1. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not make some fun out of it, then?

      Let's all try and get the most ridiculous things posted. Bad links, messed-up HTML, nonsensical grammar, the works.

      Bonus points if you insult an editor in the blurb and they still end up posting it.

    2. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Damn straight!

    3. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by learn+fast · · Score: 1
      For those that will read the above post after they change the blurb, I cut and pasted from view source:
      Posted by Zonk on Tuesday July 19, @02:26PM
      from the murdoch-immediately-propositioned-for-cyber dept.
      jagger writes "a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4695495. stm">News Corp announced on Monday that it , owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, for $580 million. This follows an announcement by News Corp on Friday that it is creating an Internet division to hold the company's sports, news and entertainment sites."
      Those broken links and html errors were not produced by my copy and pasting process. I can't imagine how even I could be more sloppy, and trust me, that's not good. There's a 'preview' button for comments. Is there one for posts?
    4. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by twilight30 · · Score: 1

      Except the editors are the Visigoths.

      --
      ========================================
      Death will come, and will have your eyes
      -- Pavese
    5. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      It's like watching the Roman Empire of tech/OSS sites crash and burn...

      You presume that there was some past in which /. had a more professional standard of editing. Trust me, that isn't the case.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    6. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by sharkey · · Score: 1

      If anyone can top the guy who got goatse.cx posted as a front-page article, I will tip my cap to you.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by Chapium · · Score: 1

      I really think the complaints about dupes aren't necessary. Dupes are nice for those of us who just check the site now and then. We are still entertained & and the sky hasnt come crashing down yet.

    8. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by Evangelion · · Score: 1

      link?

    9. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the submission itself did not have a direct link to goatse, but /. referrers were redirected:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma_whore

      Another technique is to embed a shock site link in a comment that otherwise appears relevant to the discussion, in the hope that unwitting moderators will mod up the post. The Holy Grail of any link troll is to slip a story submission containing a "shock site" link past the Slashdot editors. This situation occurred in July 2003 and June 2004 when disgruntled webmasters configured their servers to redirect to a shock site when the HTTP referrer was Slashdot.

      One particular "shock site" which is overwhelmingly preferred to others is Goatse.cx.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    10. Re:A new low for Slashdot editors by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that was it. It's a faint memory from way back when, and of course the "editors" yanked it as soon as readers posted about the link behaviour.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  12. New /. poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What was Zonk high on when he hit "submit"?

    1) Gasoline
    2) Glue
    3) Smack
    4) Everything
    5) Cowboy Neal

    1. Re:New /. poll by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      I'd get high on Cowboy Neal, but I can't stand the smell.

  13. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Slashdot admins amaze me everytime :)

  14. Nice post, Zonk! by TopShelf · · Score: 1, Insightful

    jagger writes "a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4695495. stm">News Corp announced on Monday that it , owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, for $580 million. This follows an announcement by News Corp on Friday that it is creating an Internet division to hold the company's sports, news and entertainment sites."

    How do bad links get posted on the main page like this? Isn't the subscriber preview feature supposed to help weed out these things?

    Being a /. editor has got be the easiest gig on the web. Just copy, paste, post, and...

    wait for it...

    PROFIT!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Nice post, Zonk! by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the elusive "???" part is what keeps eluding most editors.

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    2. Re:Nice post, Zonk! by Jerivix · · Score: 1

      Step one: Collect underpants!

      Step two:

      Step Three: Profit!

  15. Re:haha by Mahou · · Score: 1

    hahahahaha

    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  16. Tom talks about the sale by bunburyist · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tom talks about the sale Here

    Apparently he's one rich dude now!

    1. Re:Tom talks about the sale by rabbit+racer · · Score: 1

      that isn't tom. it's another guy named tom who it seems there was a running joke about him being tom. i am unsure if they actually belive him, but considering the pictures he has posted of himself on crewcial in past posts look nothing like the guy who shows up at interviews as tom, i would have to call bullshit on his whole claim. in that post he says all the pictures are a dupe and that the dude is some kid he knew in school, i guess he must let this random dude do his tv interviews and stuff as well.....or wait, no perhaps it could just be some lame dude trying to be funny.

  17. Rediculous by jambarama · · Score: 2, Funny

    If is isn't enough to publish dupes everyday, now BROKEN CODE made it onto the front page.

    Are you sure that Zonk checked this?

    It should read "News Corp announced on Monday that it, owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, for $580 million. This follows an announcement by News Corp on Friday that it is creating an Internet division to hold the company's sports, news and entertainment sites."

  18. Slashdot to Not Improve Story Editing Standards by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    News Corp announced on Monday that it , owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, for $580 million.

    CmdrTaco announced on Tuesday that he, founder of the popular Slashdot.org technology site, for the readability level.

    1. Re:Slashdot to Not Improve Story Editing Standards by gregarican · · Score: 1

      Dear Editors,

      The hell what say you? Tell me you will.

      Signed,
      Yoda

    2. Re:Slashdot to Not Improve Story Editing Standards by sharkey · · Score: 2

      In AD 2005, grammar was beginning...
      Taco: What, happen?
      Zonk: Somebody set up us the blurb!
      Timothy: We get POST.
      Taco: WHAT !
      Timothy: Main browser maximize on.
      Taco: Its yuo !
      jagger: How are you gentlemen !!
      jagger: All your grammar are belong to us.
      jagger: You are on the way to Webster's.
      Taco: What yuo text !!
      jagger: You have no skill to edit make your copy.
      jagger: LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL
      Timothy: Cmdr !!
      Taco: Take of everp 'Backspace' !!
      Taco: Yuo no what yuo typ'ing.
      Taco: Move ,Backspace'.
      Taco: For grate readablility.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  19. NEWS FLASH! by medix9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fair and Balanced hosting?

  20. Worst Post Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, I can only guess what the post is actually trying to say, because the poster must have failed English 101. I mean, DAMN! You most likely have a word processor with a spell and grammar checker; might as well use the damn thing.

  21. That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by bigbinc · · Score: 1, Troll

    Are you telling me that PHP garbage is worth half a billion dollars? What industry am in? Where am I?

    This is beyond the internet bubble of the 90s. Beyond the ancient California gold rush. This is like your 14 year old coming up with a highschool project, you coming in back and going, "Wow, honey this science experiment has to be worth several billion dollars, let's market it and sell it to google."

    No wonder America is a trillion dollars in debt.

    --
    ---- Berlin Brown http://www.newspiritcompany.
    1. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      coldfusion. and yes, it's crap.

    2. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Well, no, not really.

      The site itself isn't worth a shit, it's all the eyeballs that keep clicking in to play flash-games and read about each other's drunken blackouts.

      You know, it's Fox's market.

    3. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      Heh, does that mean we get to assume things about your technical aptitude, now?

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    4. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by drpimp · · Score: 1

      Check what you are writing about before you post. Are you telling us .cfm file is PHP? Or if you have a URL with domain.com/index.htm? domain.com/index.asp? domain.com/index.cgi? This tells you what server side scripting language is used? You must not be a server admin, you can make .php files to be read as .asp of what ever you want to for that matter. WOW Ignorance at it's best. Like that other guy posted. It's Coldfusion NOT PHP, as YES it's crap. Highly expensive with no benefits. Assumptions are not acceptable and comparison of PHP to Coldfusion is not even right. If you don't like PHP, (IMO it's the best web scripting language just short of Perl) you must be a Winblows guy. Ok. Done venting. .... I think you have a patch waiting for your to install.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    5. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by Shag · · Score: 1

      On Windows, no less. And yeah, I've gotten some plain-black-on-white-NT-error web pages from there.

      I'm pretty amazed that anybody would buy it. On the one hand, I'm a little curious about whether Fox will fix it, but on the other hand, given how annoying/clueless both MySpace and Fox are, I'm sure they'll get along just fine.

      And now I have yet another reason to leave. ;)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    6. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by KenBot_314 · · Score: 1

      Wow...

      That rant at the beginning of your post makes no sense...(who said he was a server admin???)
      Also: THAT WEBSITE is crap. Not Coldfusion. Saying that a language is bad because of one example of a really badly designed website is very immature.

      It really sounds like you have never used coldfusion; its not a perfect language, but it is definately worth taking a look!

    7. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by drpimp · · Score: 1

      Actually I used Coldfusion for 2 years before changing to PHP. Yes it was a rant. I would not be calling Coldfusion crap, unless I knew, from experience, that it is. It does have it's place, I will give it that. But I will never use it for a project again.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    8. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Are you telling me that PHP garbage is worth half a billion dollars?
      Hey, I actually use MySpace, and I wish it were as fast or reliable as random PHP garbage. MySpace's only strength is a consequence of Metcalf's Law: there are a lot of people on it. But it flakes out all the time, it's slow, and you have to turn on Javascript because MySpace's creators have forgotten how to hyperlink.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    9. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well at least now Tom can actually throw a halfway decent Myspace party.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    10. Re:That garbage worth 580 million dollars? by akuma(x86) · · Score: 1

      Technology has nothing to do with it (PHP, Perl, Apache, blah blah blah whatever...). I mean Ebay is one of the most valuable internet sites out there and their interface is pretty piss poor.

      What matters is that a LARGE and YOUNG group of people visit the site and therefore you can sell advertisors to that audience. Fox believes that this audience is worth $580 million. If you can attract a similar audience with your website, you could retire very rich.

  22. Social Networking is real??? by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    Well...I didn't know what to think of all this social networking when it first came out. I saw it as a "fun" little thing. Some catered to professionals, some to musicians, some to the people who just like to play on the web. I, along with many other people, simply saw it as a fad that wouldn't amount to anything. And now they're getting bought for loads of money? Are we going to have another dot com era?

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:Social Networking is real??? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      A better question would be, can the IT industry survive another dot com era? :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Social Networking is real??? by ostiguy · · Score: 1

      it does huge traffic with the teenage set, so its value to someone who wants to sell alternative lifestyles to them is likely huge.

      ostiguy

    3. Re:Social Networking is real??? by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

      You've got a great point here. Some companies have a product or a store and try to drive traffic to their site. These sites have massive traffic flow already, so now all they have to do is sell a product or service.

      This could be a new business model. Build a site that simply draws boatloads of traffic. It doesn't matter what the site does...just get the numbers. Once you reach critical mass, research the demographics and find the best fit of a product or service to sell. Hmmmm...

      --

      "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  23. my god by nomadic · · Score: 1

    $580 million? Are they insane? Yes, they are. It's not worth it. It never will be worth it. Ever.

  24. Horrible editing... by Dreoth · · Score: 1

    Blah, I submitted a much more verbose version of this to YRO last night. News Corp. owns FOX. They bought Intermix Media Inc.which owns MySpace.com

    Quote from Yahoo!:
    "The thing about MySpace is that it's a growing audience," said Jupiter Research analyst David Card. "Its users are pretty loyal. They get a lot of time spent on their pages. And the personal information they get from users is pretty reliable because they want to meet people. One would think this information would be pretty useful to advertisers." Yeah, good enough reason for me to remove my blogs and other information.

    --
    Fear the turtle farming ninja!
  25. Wow by TFloore · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are so many things to say here. I'll start with

    This sentence no verb.

    But that's okay, I think it was missing an object too.

    This entire story is going to be nothing but well-deserved bashing of Slashdot editors.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
    1. Re:Wow by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      This entire story is going to be nothing but well-deserved bashing of Slashdot editors.

      Until they fix it and the karma-whoring opportunities are gone.

  26. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OMG! I don't know about something. How is this possible? I am garcia! Knower of all there is to be knowed.

    Why would a site that's nothing but bullshit be the 5th most viewed site on the web? I would think that as a regular Internet surfer I would be able to easily rattle the top 5 sites off w/o hestitation.

    If anything, I wasn't bragging, I was surprised that some apparently crappy site was so popular.

    Thanks for the troll though.

  27. What it SHOULD have said: by griboyedov · · Score: 4, Informative

    "News Corp announced on Monday that it was the new owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, paying $580 million for it. This follows an announcement by News Corp on Friday that it is creating an Internet division to hold the company's sports, news and entertainment sites."

    1. Re:What it SHOULD have said: by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Now that this is corrected, it does show that the headline is still wrong. Fox is not "to purchase myspace" - which implies the near future. Fox purchased myspace, past-tense.

  28. Re:That makes.... by PakProtector · · Score: 1

    Yes, Zonk was, indeed, out on a Bender last night. Also present were Fry and Leela, who declined to comment other than saying, "Zonk's just zis guy, you know?"

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  29. Here's a link for ya... by gregarican · · Score: 1
  30. here is my math by Ex+Machina · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $580000000 / 22064129 profiles (lower bound set by the number of "friends" "tom" has)
    = $26.287010921664 / profile

    1. Re:here is my math by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      hence "lower bound"

    2. Re:here is my math by fbartho · · Score: 1

      you mean upper bound, I think.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    3. Re:here is my math by x0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and don't I feel stupid deleting that smug git "Tom" from my friends list* now that he's rolling around nekkid in $580m. Tom? Be my friend? Answer my emails Tom??

      (* he's added by default when you sign up)

      - Oisin

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    4. Re:here is my math by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      lower bound on the number of people, upper bound on price per account

    5. Re:here is my math by tor528 · · Score: 1

      I'd say your math is fairly accurate, because:

      22272629 in my "Network"
      $580000000 / 22272629 = $26.04 per profile

      On MySpace, "Your Network" (or Extended Network) is how many friends of friends you have within three (or four?) hops. Since Tom is everyone's default friend, and is still friends with so many users, it is safe to assume that everyone who actually uses the site is in my extended network.

      --
      If I think something is funny, I will probably mod it +1 Insightful. "It's funny because it's true."
  31. Fox... reminds of Simpsons by Gopal.V · · Score: 1
    Do you remember the ending of the Marge driving an Suv episode ?.
    Homer: [voice-over] I'd like to read the following statement, but I do so under ... [sound of gun cocking] ... my own free will.

    It has come to my attention that NBC sucks.

    I apologize for misleading you and urge you to watch as many Fox shows as possible.

    So in summary, NBC -- bad.
    Fox -- good.
    CBS great.

    [sound of gunshot, followed by a thud.]
    Anyway, the worst article ever. Bad links and I'll wait to see what Fox does with MySpace.com - I predict a disaster.
  32. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by eln · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I checked it out this morning I realized that it's nothing more than a "good looking" spam webportal.

    It's basically a blogging site, not a "spam webportal." If you like blogging sites, you've probably heard of myspace, and might even have a personal "space" there. If you ignore all things blogging, you probably have never heard of myspace, or don't care about it either way.

  33. Re:Tpyo by ChrisBennett · · Score: 1

    the keys are like right next to each other

  34. Missing option by op12 · · Score: 1

    He was (heavily) intoxicated, you insensitive clod!

  35. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by MrPerfekt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps you've not heard of the "Social Networking" catagory?

    The point is you have a large site with thousands and thousands of members and then have those members "mingle" with each other and prominately display their connections.

    Yes, it is a bit high school.. but the reason why it's the fifth most popular site: because it's huge among high schoolers.

    But it does serve it's purpose I guess. Now, if only they could a) afford decent programmers and b) stop loading the site up with flash animations that suck my cpu dry.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  36. Well, I'm fairly certain by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    that /. doesn't have a "vent radioactive gas" command.

    Then again, who knowns....

    1. Re:Well, I'm fairly certain by Nytewynd · · Score: 1

      Accept Post?
      [Y/N]:> Y

      Accept Post?
      [Y/N]:> Y

      Accept Post?
      [Y/N]:> Y

      Crash Servers?
      [Y/N]:> Y

      --
      /. ++
  37. Re:That garbage worth 580 million? (it's not php) by Khyron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dude, that's unfair to PHP developers everywhere...

    MySpace runs CFML, and always has. Specifically, today they runs their CFML application code on Blue Dragon, rather than ColdFusion for the increased scalability and compatibility with a .NET stack. Their leaders spoke at CFUnited a few weeks ago.

  38. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    When I checked it out this morning I realized that it's nothing more than a "good looking" spam webportal.

    Wrong, it's a horrible looking spam social networking site that has all the lousy bits of livejournal, friendster, makeoutclub, and amihotornot.com. It's all the rage among college freshmen.

    --
    -mkb
  39. I want the old slashdot back by Soong · · Score: 1

    the one that didn't suck.

    I want the old CNN back too; back before they tried to out-Fox Faux News.

    Wah.

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
  40. broken link not showing? by TheRealDamion · · Score: 1

    It's probably automatically corrected by IE so none of the windows using /. editors even know what these threads are talking about.

  41. Open Source Myspace by dominion · · Score: 1

    I've been working on an open source myspace style website called Appleseed for a while now. Screenshots are available on the website. I'm planning on releasing the code soon.

    I've always been really annoyed with myspace. The coding errors, the bombardment of ads, that creepy "Tom" guy. But a lot of my friends were on it, so I made an account.

    I'm hoping that a distributed project like Appleseed would do a bit to take the carpet out from under the rug of things like MySpace and Friendster, which are as much about community as Wal-Mart is.

    I'm not very close to being done with Appleseed. I'm running low on time, and I'm hoping that releasing the code will encourage others to help out. I think I've gotten a decent foundation completed, and once I have the code cleaned up and at a point that I'm not embarrassed by it, I'll let it loose on the world.

  42. Suggestion .. by Entropy · · Score: 1

    Every time I get mod points, it asks me if I have read the moderator guidelines yet.

    Perhaps there should be a link for editor guidelines ..

    I mean, this is brutally bad editing, folks.

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
  43. Myspace is yucky. by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 1

    Maybe Fox will improve the site's layout. As it stands, Myspace is a very poorly designed website, especially compared to The Facebook.

  44. Just what we need.... by ramblin+billy · · Score: 2, Funny


    Thank god! No more of that pesky decision process..."hmmmm, this website says homosexual behavior causes your teeth to fall out, makes you get bad gas mileage and condemns you to an eternity in hell, I wonder if I can trust it?"

    At last! A 'Fair and Balanced' portal!

    billy - hackers of the world unite! can you say 'foxse' ? i knew you could...

  45. Hey, I think you dropped this by isthisorigional · · Score: 1

    Here ya go buddy, Looks like that might come in handy one day!

  46. The Slashdot post by Evro · · Score: 1, Informative
    In the event it gets fixed, here's how Zonk's post looks as of 14:40 US EST:

    jagger writes "a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4695495. stm">News Corp announced on Monday that it , owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, for $580 million. This follows an announcement by News Corp on Friday that it is creating an Internet division to hold the company's sports, news and entertainment sites."


    Good job, Zonk!
    --
    rooooar
  47. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by beowulfy · · Score: 1

    i've been a myspace user since it started and there's no spam involved. its just a good way of communicating with people you normally don't see. its also a nice way to keep track of bands as they tour if you become 'friends' with them. also nice if your a band to be able to send out bulletins to all the people your 'friends' with.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -Hunter S. Thompson
  48. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why would you call it bullshit just because you don't have a use for it?

    Basically, it's a social networking site that's pretty easy to use. It also hosts music for smaller bands, and allow people to share photos of themselves. It lets normal people make web pages about themselves. Just think of all the people who want to make a web page, but don't know how.

    Yeah, you may think that's lame, but why don't you try searching for some of your friends or old classmates by name there. You'll probably find at least one.

  49. It's ok by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there's plenty of fat guys wearing muu-muus browsing /. to save us should anything happen.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  50. Slow down, Cowboy! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

    It's only been like half a day since you posted the last dupe or incomprehensible post!

    Give the other editors a chance.

    (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!)

  51. Original article post by funny-jack · · Score: 1

    For anyone who is wondering what the anti-/.-"editor" comments are all about, this is what the original story looked like.

    Pathetic.

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
  52. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by dnixon112 · · Score: 1
    Why would a site that's nothing but bullshit be the 5th most viewed site on the web?


    Maybe, just maybe it's not 'nothing but bullshit'? Perhaps there are sites out there that offer services that you don't like. Imagine that.
  53. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by lpangelrob · · Score: 1
    In addition to what's been said, it actually started as a website for promoting independent bands. I've never been in a band myself, but it's immediately obvious from just observing that people in bands like to critique each other's stuff, and to some extent, promote each other. MySpace became the place to go for stuff like that.

    It grew a bit from there because someone decided that, hey, maybe people in general would like to have something like this.

    The site feels really, really hacked together at times... as if there were phpNuke modules being tacked on every few months... but it stays online and serves its purpose and audience well.

  54. My thoughts on editors... by mikvo · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder why we waste so much time in the discussion threads telling the editors how poorly they do their jobs. It's obvious that they don't even pay much attention to the actual submitted articles. Do you think they actually read the discussions?

  55. Netcraft by Kj0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to Netcraft, the rank of MySpace.com is only 76.

    Number 1 is -- of course -- Google. Slashdot has rank 587.

    1. Re:Netcraft by infonography · · Score: 1
      According to Netcraft, the rank of MySpace.com is only 76.

      Number 1 is -- of course -- Google. Slashdot has rank 587.

      If we are only 587, does that mean we can't slashdot them? I feel soo weak......

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    2. Re:Netcraft by ferat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      www.slashdot.org is 587.
      slashdot.org is 35.

      Wonder where /. would rank if both were combined.

    3. Re:Netcraft by Bill+Barth · · Score: 1

      That's for www.slashdot.org, slashdot.org is 35.

      --
      Yes...I am a rocket scientist.
    4. Re:Netcraft by beowulfy · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure i belive their info. they list themselves as #5, above amazon.com that seem like bs to me. ask about anyone and they'll tell you who amazon is. netcraft...uh who's that?

      --
      "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -Hunter S. Thompson
    5. Re:Netcraft by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      burnt cookies?

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    6. Re:Netcraft by rayde · · Score: 1

      the netcraft toolbar users are not a good sample space for doing statistical analysis of internet traffic...

    7. Re:Netcraft by swf · · Score: 1

      Actually, slashdot is at number 35.

    8. Re:Netcraft by Hard_Rock_2 · · Score: 1

      Well http://slashdot.org/ is, www.slashdot.org is a bit further down. I guess to conlude most people find typing www. excessively time consuming.

  56. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    Touche! I stand corrected.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  57. Well, Rupert's money's going up the chimney. by crovira · · Score: 1

    The rates on Fox are about to go up.

    The audience for this site may sound like an idea demographic, but not for paying for a site.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  58. Re:Tpyo by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's not a big typo. Only the very first character from the post is missing, a "<" - which of course broke the hyperlink. Probably someone copied this blurb from somewhere else and pasted it into the submission form, not using the Preview button. Then the editors didn't check the submission before allowing it go to the front page.

    Being that this slashdot, I find that an entirely plausible scenario.

  59. Never heard of MySpace. by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    I had never heard of MySpace until, by coincidence, I read this story about the site yesterday. To hear that it was sold for millions of dollars surprised me, to say the least. I went to check it out yesterday and, while I didn't spend much time with it, it seemed there wasn't anything that could be done without signing up for a profile first! It hurts us, precious!

  60. You can buy my domain... by jekewa · · Score: 1
    Hey, Fox! I've got a couple of underused domain names you can have for half that much!

    I'd list 'em here, but they'd no doubt be crippled by /. almost immediately. I have the domain names, but just some old PCs as servers for 'em...you'll have to use your own iron.

    --
    End the FUD
  61. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe, just maybe it's not 'nothing but bullshit'? Perhaps there are sites out there that offer services that you don't like. Imagine that.

    You would think that Google, Yahoo, MSN, CNN, and any other major news site would attract a TON more traffic than myspace.com.

    I would also think that you would somehow be linked there frequently by friends, search engines, or news stories. It surprises me that as the 5th most viewed site on the web I have never had Google tell me to go there when searching for "foo".

    It has nothing to do w/me liking the site or not.

  62. What pisses you off most about slashdot? by jambarama · · Score: 1, Funny

    What about slashdot pisses you off the most?

    1. 404
    2. Articles are frequent dupes
    3. Roland Piquepaille advertisements
    4. Broken Code (on the main page)
    5. You can't edit your comments
    6. Poor spelling/grammar (in articles)
    7. The moderation system
    8. Sluggish server responses (being slashdotted)
    9. Flamebait articles designed to start holy wars
    10. Stories no one cares about.

    1. Re:What pisses you off most about slashdot? by protocol420 · · Score: 1

      how hard would it be to coralize all submitted URLs? one line of code?

      --
      www.gaian-mind.org - eco-punk/crust coop and collective | www.anarchistfederation.org - so cal anarchist federation
  63. my question by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    for a site bombarded with "win a free xxxx" ads and populated (mostly) by the usual losers looking for a free hook-up (they're also the ones who click on those ads), how is this worth 580 mil? really, do some browsing on myspace.com - the average IQ has to be close to room temperature. wtf does FOX see in this crap?

    1. Re:my question by op12 · · Score: 1

      the average IQ has to be close to room temperature

      In Fahrenheit or Celsius? :)

    2. Re:my question by NineNine · · Score: 2, Funny

      the average IQ has to be close to room temperature. wtf does FOX see in this crap?

      Their average viewer.

    3. Re:my question by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      they make IQ in Farenheit and Celsius now?

    4. Re:my question by mpontes · · Score: 1

      Winner. Parent should even be modded insightful, not funny. There should be an option for "+1, Zing" (or "+1, Burn").

      --
      Bored? Browse Slashdot with a +6 modifier for Troll comme
  64. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by ajayvb · · Score: 1

    MySpace apparently has a strong community for Indie music bands, and has a 'stickiness' quotient far higher than that of Friendster or other social networking sites. BW Link

  65. editors should be subject to the same rules by rrosales · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else believe that editors should be forced to click a "Preview" button to see how the actual topic will be displayed before publishing it to the public? It does say "(Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!)"

  66. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by mattsucks · · Score: 1
    Yes, it is a bit high school.. but the reason why it's the fifth most popular site: because it's huge among high schoolers.
    fyi it has also proven to be a very useful tool for musicians and bands looking to connect with potential fans.

    (Yes, I'm in a band, and no, I'm not going to whore it here.)
  67. TOS excerpt by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hope you like giving away your hard-earned works for free to Fox: By posting Content on any public area of MySpace.com, you automatically grant as well as represent and warrant that you have the right to grant to MySpace.com, an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, fully paid, worldwide license to use, copy, perform, display, and distribute such information and content to MySpace.com and that MySpace.com has the right to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such information and content, and to grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    1. Re:TOS excerpt by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is going to be a problem for the thousands of bands (including mine) that uploaded 3 songs for myspace listeners to check out. They don't own our music.

    2. Re:TOS excerpt by chrisbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Holy shit. Was this in the TOS all along? I don't personally care; I post no works on the site. But for the small-time musicians...am I correct in saying this was really not a big deal before, since MySpace didn't have any means of distributing the works they "own", but now that they have a media outlet behind them, they can use the works however they want AND have a good way to distribute and sell them? Please tell me I'm wrong on this one.

    3. Re:TOS excerpt by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Hope you like giving away your hard-earned works for free to Fox:

      is there a change-of-control clause?

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    4. Re:TOS excerpt by SunCrushr · · Score: 2, Informative

      IANAL, but as far as I can see, reading the MySpace TOS, this does not grant MySpace, or whoever owns them any rights to use your works in any way whatsoever. So you don't have to worry about MySpace stealing your music or photos.

      What you are agreeing to is that you have the right to give them those rights to the content you are posting if they ask you for the rights. You don't have to give them those rights under any cercumstance, and you most certainly are not giving them any control rights over your copyright. You are simply stating that those rights are yours to give in the first place.

      That way, you are agreeing that the content you are posting is basically yours to post, and you are taking responsibility if you don't have those rights and are breaking copyright. This way, MySpace can't get sued if you post someone else's works.

    5. Re:TOS excerpt by chrisbro · · Score: 1

      OK, whew. You saved me an embarrassing rant on my blog. ;) For the first time, I can now say "mod me down" and mean it (regarding my previous post).

    6. Re:TOS excerpt by chrisbro · · Score: 1

      This is going to have to be looked into further. Completely unacceptable if Fox suddenly took into their wings all of the submitted content on MySpace. How does it work with uploaded content that already has rights? Musicians who put up songs that already have a record deal with the songs on it? I'm going to watch this one closely.

    7. Re:TOS excerpt by DustyShadow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They changed the Terms of Service today. Perhaps it was because of this post?? Perhaps commenting on Slashdot goes further than we think?? It's funny cause I posted a bulletin about it on myspace and they deleted it. I'm surprised they can read all of them...It now says:

      c. By posting any Content to the public areas of the Website, you hereby grant to MySpace.com the non-exclusive, fully paid, worldwide license to use, publicly perform and display such Content on the Website. This license will terminate at the time you remove such Content from the Website. You represent and warrant that: (i) you own the Content posted by you on the Website or otherwise have the right to grant the license set forth in this section, and (ii) your Content does not violate the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyright rights, or other intellectual property rights of any person. You agree to pay for all royalties and fees owing any person by reason of any Content you post on the Website.

    8. Re:TOS excerpt by SunCrushr · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that the language is somewhat vague, but as far as I can tell here, you aren't granting them rights. You are granting that you have the right to grant them rights.

      Probably should be looked at by a lawyer to be certain, but I don't think this is an issue, since AFAIK, you can't give rights to copyright without a signed contract anyway. An online "click here to agree" would never hold up in court, and the courts tend to lean on the side of ruling in favor of the content creator when it comes to disputes caused by vague wording in contracts. Even a lot of signed contracts in the record business don't hold up when the content creator makes a dispute. Also, there is no clause in this TOS that grants them any control rights over your copyright, so even if this TOS grants them the right to repost your work, (which may for example be neeeded so that they can do things like show pictures of new people on the site) you can revoke their right at any time, because you hold control over the copyright. So, in other words, I wouldn't worry.

    9. Re:TOS excerpt by SunCrushr · · Score: 1

      Nevermind.
      Looks like they cleared it up on the site after noticing that lots of people may be worried.
      Now its much clearer.
      They don't own your work at all.

  68. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by Stud1y · · Score: 1

    since when do kids like the news more than pictures of their friends?

    come on. its like hot or not but with sluttier girls.

  69. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by TheScottishGuy · · Score: 1

    i know that's all i used it for, it let me catch up with old high school peeps.

  70. Sorry about the copy errors, folks. by ravenspear · · Score: 1

    They have been fixed. :)

    "CmdrTaco announced on Tuesday that he, founder of the popular Slashdot.org technology site, doesn't give a shit for the readability level."

  71. Error in your math by nganju · · Score: 1


    FTA:
    "it has agreed to acquire Intermix Media Inc., which owns more than 30 e-commerce and media websites"

    So MySpace is only one of 30 e-commerce sites owned by the acquired company. It's not reasonable to assume that MySpace is worth $580 million by itself.

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
  72. Hmmm by dspisak · · Score: 1

    Hopefully MySpace won't turn into MyRepublicanNeoConSpace. However it will be great if the FOX people can get rid of the %&$%^$ Jamster ads from the site. I hate ads that make noise.

    1. Re:Hmmm by acb · · Score: 1

      It'll use GeoIP to detect where you're viewing from. In the US, it'll be festooned with flags and show ads for Ann Coulter's latest book. In Britain, it'll be done up in the Burberry tartan and run warnings about dark-skinned terrorist paedophiles and pictures of big-breasted blondes. In China, it'll administer an electric shock if you use the word "democracy".

  73. Re:MySpace by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hopefully someone will convince people how stupid Fox is,

    Rupert Murdock is *far* from stupid, and Fox isn't either. That's what makes them dangerous. They achieve their ultra-right propaganda by cunning punditry, subtle underdogging of (what they consider) "leftists", fast-paced bullshitting and a heavy usage of Goebbels motto: "repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth" (the "fair and balanced" crap).

    People who don't know better believe Fox. The same people who think Saddam Hussein somehow was involved in 9/11. That's what makes them dangerous. If they were stupid, it'd be easy to expose them.

    and get people to stop using MySpace. Oh, can you imagine it? A world without MySpace?

    Uuh, I think the question on many people's minds is: wtf is MySpace? 'nuff said.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  74. Prioritize people! Behold! the list... by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
    Why make fun of /. editors when there is so much MySpace to make fun of!?
    Here's a random one that came up: http://www.myspace.com/mentalescape/
    Beware of really bad MIDI beats.

    If you've never taken a second to look at some of this stuff on MySpace, its just a bunch of people taking pics of themselves and waiting for compliments.
    1. Add a list of horrible metalcore/emo-pseudo-teen-angst music (music played by 30 year olds, with lyrics written by 7th grade girls that just got off a SERIOUSLY DEEP 3 day relationship OMG)
    2. Drop the names of a few obscure movies and old TV shows you were too young for
    3. Guys- wear some girls jeans, and even if your shooting star tatoo is still red take a pic immediately as its added points!
    4. Girls- wear your makeup like you're 4 years old and just broke into mommy's purse
    ...much more can be added I know.

  75. I figured... by Stud1y · · Score: 1

    That a digital camera company would buy it. Being all these kids got digital camera's for chrismas for no reason other than to take pictures of themselves half-clothed so the can get more "friends" on their list... What else are they supposed to do with these things? They're all pseduo-photographer-journalist-peotry-emo kids... oh well. at least some are hot.

    1. Re:I figured... by Stud1y · · Score: 1

      hypocrite? we both have all of our clothes on? stop stalkering my fiance! EAK!

  76. All they have left to do by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Now all Rupert needs to do is to figure out how to cut out the left side of the space.

    --
    That is all.
  77. Confirmed by imatt · · Score: 1

    Tom Confirmed this via MySpace Message. It's pending.

  78. Missing option by rylin · · Score: 1

    All of the above?

    Well, number five ain't that bad.
    Other than that, I'd like to congratulate you on summing up /. in ten points!

    You forgot one point though:
    11. Posts complaining about slashdot automatically getting modded down.

  79. Re:Poll Idea by typobox43 · · Score: 1

    9. CowboyNeal

  80. We're all fucked! by killawatt5k · · Score: 1

    Nooooooo! this can't be! I just figured out how to put Beyonces' "crazy in love" video on my page! Noooo!

  81. 580,000,000 dollars by RTSKABJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how do they plan on making it back?

    1. Re:580,000,000 dollars by superdoo · · Score: 1

      Volume. Didn't you learn anything from the .com bubble?

  82. Why? by joschm0 · · Score: 1

    This really scares me why the media arm of the Whitehouse is interested in a "Social Networking" blogging website.

    --
    01/20/09
  83. Ugliest site ever by stelmach · · Score: 1

    This is proof that your site doesn't have to be pretty to be profitable.

  84. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by dsands1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd say it's more than just a good looking spam webportal. I'd classify it as the "have all, be all, end all of internet hook-up sites". In summary:

    1. Broke up with my g/f of 4 years in Oct 2004
    2. Spent a couple months just feeling sorry for myself and not dating at all
    3. On the recommendation of a friend I set up a profile on myspace and started making "friends".
    4. By mid-January 2005 I'd been on probably 8-10 dates, quite a few of which led to... intimate relations.

    That's why people are going to the site.

    --
    "What is the answer?" (Silence) "In that case, what is the question?" --Gertrude Stein
  85. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by bmeteor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i agree with you. I keep in touch with most of my friends on it. It's kind of replaced most of my personal email. I've seen some really great bands off of it, hooked up off of it, threw some great parties, and gotten to know some really great people too. I run a book club off it too.

    I originally got on it, because friendster was really buggy at the time, and my ex on the time was on it.

    it's hilarious too in that I'll go to the bar, and see people I've seen on myspace, and we'll talk about it like it's some guilty pleasure. it's pretty funny when a girl you've never met tells you that they know you when they only know you from myspace.

    but yeah, hopefully Fox recognizes that the brand is stronger than fox, and doesn't try to insert some of their coporate DNA into it.

    (I'm 27 in case you were wondering )

  86. high schoolers by ChrisBennett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the most popular site for older guys trying to get younger high school girls.

    1. Re:high schoolers by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      It's the most popular site for older guys trying to get younger high school girls.

      How's that been working out for you?

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    2. Re:high schoolers by ChrisBennett · · Score: 1

      Not why I use it. Funny story that made me think of that though:

      My girlfriend who was 17 at the time was messaged by a 24 year old guy who said "hey cutie, you're pretty hot, what's your number, i'll call you some time".

      She was as freaked out so I told her she should give him her number, except that it would happen to be the same number of the police department.

      He called it. =D

  87. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by jcdill · · Score: 2, Informative
    I was shocked to know that there was a domain out there that I have never visited yet it's the fifth most popular out there.


    Maybe you haven't heard about this "5th most popular internet domain in the US" because it's not actually in 5th place (no surprise there!).

    Netcraft rates www.myspace.com at 76th worldwide:

    http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=www.my space.com

    below more popular sites like Google, Yahoo, Amazon, eBay, PayPal, CNN, MSN, /. (at #35), IMDB, DSL Reports, Comcast, Fox News, NY Times, etc. Here's a list of the Netcraft top 100:

    http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=DA280 D988226E9C01B1D0E6F2491#76

    jc
    --
    "I'd much rather be mistaken as a lesbian by a bigot than be mistaken as a bigot by a lesbian."
  88. This sounds a *lot* like Disney's GO.COM by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    Disney did this "entertainment and sports" portal called GO.COM.

    It failed.

  89. Sentence was correct, just not finished by mindaktiviti · · Score: 2, Funny

    The sentence is correct, it just wasn't finished:

    News Corp announced on Monday that it , owner of the popular MySpace.com social networking site, for $580 million purchased 5,800,000 $100 coupons for spyware removal tools for all of its employees, their extended families and friends, when the improbability drive from the Heart of Gold wizzed by News Corp's Think Tank, ripping a hole in the space time continuum of the CEO's brain.

    It was reported that hilarity ensued.

  90. The internet boom 2.0 by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    The cool part of the internet is when you buy X million profiles, there are still an infinite number left to buy - you own 0%. They are not a scare resource. I assume this will be a new addition to Fox Kids, since myspace is mostly K-12.

    This fad too shall pass, remember when dialup subscribers were worth something? MySpace is so last year, now it's all about the podcast.

    Podcast: n, 1. The voice of the person who cannot understand why noone cared about their webpage about their cat, the blog about their cat, or the social network of cat lovers. 2. the precursor to Vodcast - the daily video on demand... about peoples cats.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:The internet boom 2.0 by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      so... this time you didn't RTFSite? K-12? Wth? try 18-dead, aka, prime marketing target.

      Yes I use it. Mostly for entertainment, to see what the hell some people act like.. Must be a voyuristic thing, *shrugs*

      Nothing is more obnoxious then whiny teenaged girls who are borderline retarded who openly admit they lied to get a "profilez", because the site tries to restrict to 18+, probably for legal reasons... If nothing else, just to disclaim if someone DOES yell at them over their precious little angel seeing a booby on teh intarweb.

      Just FYI. :-D

    2. Re:The internet boom 2.0 by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      Bah, I meant to use FWIW, and not FYI... stupid T&FLA's...

  91. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    I hadn't heard of the site yet, either, but from your description, it sounds very much like Orkut, and while I wouldn't go as far as the grandparent poster and describe that as a spam webportal, it isn't exactly useful, either.

    Ultimately, it probably fits right in with sports news sites, online poker sites and the like - sites that are popular because they appeal to the masses, but that the intelligentsia is much less likely to visit.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  92. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    Because you're not hip and "with it".

  93. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Why would a site that's nothing but bullshit be the 5th most viewed site on the web?

    Why is 90% of the email I get spam? :) Same reason really - most people are stupid. Admittedly, that's a somewhat misanthropic point of view, but it seems to be true more often than not...

    I would think that as a regular Internet surfer I would be able to easily rattle the top 5 sites off w/o hestitation.

    I'm pretty sure that Yahoo and Google (in whatever order) are #1 and 2, but what's #3, 4 and 5? I'm not sure that it's really something that you'd "just know" as a web surfer - there simply are too many sites with lots of visitors.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  94. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by bmeteor · · Score: 1

    now all the people making fun of it are going to get accounts. Way to let the secret out. :-)

  95. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by Morgon · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the people who absolutely can't live without posting music videos to their site, or in comments of other people's profiles...

    Thank god for Greasemonkey, I can't visit it without arming myself with the MySpace Tag Remover script.

    http://www.kenmickles.com/greasemonkey - free plug for you, dude!

    --
    [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
  96. Fox just bought it... by doormat · · Score: 1

    because they want to make sure the 2020 republican presidential candidate wont have his myspace profile to come back and bite him in the ass.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  97. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Uhh, I'm not so sure that anyone who includes a "Furry Portal" in their profile should insinuate that they are part of an "intelligensia"....

  98. Re:MySpace by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    Evil , manipulative , monopolistic tendencies ,total lack of ethics and extremely biased

    Stupid though , defiantly not

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  99. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would other people be going to such a large site but not me? When I checked it out this morning I realized that it's nothing more than a "good looking" spam webportal.

    Myspacers invite their friends, people they think are cool, so I wouldn't expect it to catch on with Slashdot. I'm actually a little saddened that it got exposure on here, which will inevitably lead to more geekiness one-up-manship and more teenage immaturity.

    Myspace was best when it had 3 million members almost a year ago. Trendy, savvy, without being overly geeky. Now that it has 20+ million members, everyone and their mother has a myspace, losers and all.

    And now an influx of slashdot geeks....

  100. In other news... by jgold03 · · Score: 1

    All myspaces must now be pro-Bush and Arab-hating, or else they will be pulled.

  101. Re:My American friend.. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    mods +5 funny!

    hahaha! thats probably the best reply ever to a discussion of communism! you just made my day. :-D

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  102. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

    but yeah, hopefully Fox recognizes that the brand is stronger than fox, and doesn't try to insert some of their coporate DNA into it.

    "Look for your friends, but do not trust to hope. It has forsaken these lands."

  103. Philosophical Question by jpiggot · · Score: 1

    So, does this make it "TheirSpace" ? (ducks)

  104. Bad news for MySpace by m3g4t0ky0 · · Score: 1

    MySpace will suffer the same fate as most of Fox's TV shows -- cancellation. I can see it now... "ZOMG WHAT WILL I DO NOW THAT MYSPACE HAS BEEN CANCELLED!?!!!?1"

    --
    Har...
  105. Here's why by Ultronator · · Score: 1

    1) Buy company hosting the largest social networking site on the internet.

    2) Use its user base to fuel your next big reality show.

    3) We have to suffer through another crappy FOX reality show and of course (sadly) Profit!!!

  106. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by danharan · · Score: 1
    I would think that as a regular Internet surfer I would be able to easily rattle the top 5 sites off w/o hestitation.
    I'm pretty sure you couldn't. But there is a list according to Alexa Note they put myspace at #13.
    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  107. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    Ditto. My band has a page there and we've set up numerous shows with other bands coming through town strictly through myspace. I don't even bother updating our regular website anymore because the myspace site does everything we need it to.. for now.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  108. Congratulations! by pclminion · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, Fox! You are now the owners of the largest softcore kiddy-porn site on the Internet!

  109. Re:Do now. by robolemon · · Score: 1

    They don't own it, the copyright holders still do.

    It's just that the copyright holders can't prevent them from doing anything at all with their works, including selling them on CDs (or as digital downloads) it would seem.

    --

    I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

  110. Hannidate by Edzor · · Score: 1

    hmmm this will go well with Hannidate!!! where like minded right wing rednecks kind find that special one!

  111. Re:Do now. by pclminion · · Score: 1
    Do now. You gave it to them. At least those three songs.

    No. What they have is an irrevocable license to use and sublicense the work. They don't own it, but they have all the same rights as the author to profit from it.

  112. FoxSpace by Altephfour · · Score: 1

    This just in, FoxSpace (Formerly MySpace) declares any anti-bush posts or blogs to be hereby banned. Also, no gays allowed. The "Bi" and "Gay" catagories under sexual attraction will be removed at the soonest convenience. (Please note that this is in now way fact, just a little joke and play on foxnews)

    --
    ~~Altephfour Chat operator for G4TV
  113. Intermix, Inc sued for spyware violations by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    Intermix, Inc., the company that owns MySpace.com, is the very same company sued by NYS Attorney General for spyware violations. They also have a LONG history of spamming the universe.

    Fox is just getting more crappy by the day.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  114. Social Networking Starts by... by isoprophlex · · Score: 1

    Getting out of your bedroom and going to meet real people in person. Not over the internet! I had a myspace account for a little while. I deleted it about 2 months ago in disgust of how Tom kept adding himself back to my friends list!

  115. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by Carbonated+Milk · · Score: 1

    The posts are very entertaining. They're written by the collective lovechild of AOL and GameFAQs users.

  116. Hey Great.. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'll finally get the know-how to fix the fucking thing.

    That site has the shittiest coding I've ever seen... the thing's down at least once a day (not counting maintenance).

    1/10 page views will get you a "Sorry! An error has occurred."

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  117. Re:Do now. by lucas_picador · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Hence "nonexclusive". You retain the copyright and can still license the work to others; but MySpace has a license to distribute your work too. This is kind of a no-brainer: you can't sue MySpace for broadcasting on the web the stuff you've posted to their site. That's the whole point. It does, however, point out the irony of the name: "MySpace". It's not your space, it's theirs: they pay for it, they put ads on it, and they can do what they want with it. Want to retain control over your personal profile? It's called a "personal web page" hosted on a server you pay for yourself.

  118. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by damsa · · Score: 1

    Probably because you have no friends. And that you are over the age of 12.

  119. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by wizarddc · · Score: 1

    I can vouch for this man's story, as basically give a big ditto, on all the points he listed. All of this happened with me, too. It's seriously worth it.

    --
    Th
  120. Re:Why haven't I heard of the 5th most popular sit by x102output · · Score: 1

    simply put, it's computers injected into our sex lives. search engines at use on uploaded personality samples to rapidly get to people we think we would find interesting. it's about time we have the google of our dating lives. bars are getting obsolete

  121. the spin is in already! by dsands1 · · Score: 1

    So this morning, after reading this post, I made a bulletin on myspace letting all my "friends" know what had happened as far as the sale of myspace was concerned. During the course of the day several friends reposted it to all of their friends in the form of myspace bulletins. Well, I come home this evening and log... guess what? All of our bulletins have been deleted and there's a nice note from Tom up top stating: "don't worry myspace isn't going to change or shut down, and no one's profiles are going to get deleted. we are not charging and i'm not leaving myspace... things are going good !"

    Well isn't that nice. Great way to inspire confidence by censoring/del0rting our posts. =/

    --
    "What is the answer?" (Silence) "In that case, what is the question?" --Gertrude Stein
  122. Re:MySpace by will_die · · Score: 1

    The same people who think Saddam Hussein somehow was involved in 9/11.
    Since when is Foxnews widly watched by Democrates?
    If you go read the full reports(you will need an upper end libary or work in place that gets them) of the companies ask this question the majority of the people think this was the case voted for Kerry or classified themselves as democrates or independants(possibility of not voting). Thoses that classified themselves as Republicans who voted for Bush and believed this was a very small percent.
    Now it gets really interesting is when you start comparing the amount with the time line. The number of people who said this was the case increased while the movie "fahrenheit 9/11" was gaining in popularity and hit a near record high after the DVD had been released. It has been dropping since then and as of March was back to the lows.

  123. Re:And The Scariest Thing Is... by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    Wow, that _is_ severely conspiracy theory.

    I doubt just because News Corp. (not Fox News, you shmuck) wants to own a highly successful site that has millions of people looking at it per day so they can plaster 20th Century Fox (the movie studio) and Fox (the tv network) ads all over it that they'll seriously start claiming they own everything that every user posts on the site. That's quite simply ludicris and they'd be violating many laws when they did it. The nature of that crime makes it pretty easy to hold them responsible for. So take off your tin-foil hat please.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!