Slashdot Mirror


Apple To Unveil iPod Cellphone Next Week?

Mictian writes "Apple Computer is planning to hold a major press conference next week (September 7th) in San Francisco and the rumours say that it will be the unveiling of a new iPod cellphone (NYT). The phone would incorporate the popular iTunes software, be built by Motorola and marketed by Cingular Wireless. The companies have declined to confirm or deny the report, which would fit Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day."

325 comments

  1. #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Cingular?

    1. Re:#1 by Brento · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why Cingular?

      First, they sell Motorola phones, and Motorola partnered with Apple to build it. Also, they're a GSM carrier, and they seem to sell bleeding edge phones a little bit quicker than other carriers. Motorola probably built the first version as GSM because more carriers use that protocol. I love Verizon, but ditched 'em for Cingular because Cingular gets cooler phones faster. Granted, the coverage isn't as good, but hey, geeks love toys.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    2. Re:#1 by amichalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First, they sell Motorola phones, and Motorola partnered with Apple to build it.

      I contend that Apple partnered with Cingular because they are the largest carrier in the US, now that they merged with AT&T, and because Cingular would allow Apple to sell a phone that didn't get it music by buying from an over priced Verizon music store. Sprint, Verizon, etc sell Motorola phones too (yeah, Sprint only sells CDMA Motos) but the GSM carriers will sell whatever they think is gonna bring in the customers.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    3. Re:#1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because Cingular is the largest US provider that uses GSM - a world-wide standard. Since most high-end Motorola phones are quad-band GSM they can be sold anywhere in the world. Cingular is probably the first US carrier - and international partners are surely to follow very soon.

      A phone for Verizon or Spring is mostly worthless outside US.

      Technologically, US is behind most other markets anyway so I would expect Motorola to sell more of these in Europe.

      Also, Motorola has been known to do "exclusive" deals with Cingular (ie, Razr v3).

    4. Re:#1 by eunos94 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plus, by issuing a GSM phone, Apple is open to pretty much the whole world on one phone platform. CDMA is pretty much US only and companies like Verizon, while supporting tech like Bluetooth, only support it in a crippled version that they can fee their customers to death with.

    5. Re:#1 by Dr.Opveter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm not from America, but I had a Cingular Pay to Go plan (or whatever it's called again --a prepaid kind of system) last time I was over there for a few weeks and I couldn't figure out how to change the voicemail so that it wouldn't pick up after 3 rings already. Couldn't shut it either.
      Totally annoying experience.

      --
      Sample this!
    6. Re:#1 by samdu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From all accounts, it wasn't easy to find ANY carrier to carry the iPhone. Cingular apparently was the first to give in and give it a shot.

    7. Re:#1 by MAdMaxOr · · Score: 1

      Fees, shorty fees.

    8. Re:#1 by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      T-mobile also sells Motorola phones, is a GSM carrier, and tends to have some focus on hop new phones.

    9. Re:#1 by lordholm · · Score: 1

      Umm... I don't get it, are the mobile phone network providers in the US selling phones? In Europe we buy a phone and use it with whatever network we like to. Although one could get a discount on the phone if it's locked to a specific provider, you never purchase the phone from the network provider.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    10. Re:#1 by Woody77 · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      The way the system works in the US is that the phone manufacturers develop a phone, and work with the network to produce a phone specifically for that network. Then the carrier buys all the phones from the manufacturer, and the carrier sells the phones to the end-user, usually at some massive discount from "retail". For instance, Sprint takes $150 off the price of a new phone in exchange for a 2-year contract, Verizon does something similar.

      The GSM carriers even try to "lock" the handsets to the original carrier, but that appears to be easily breakable.

      In the US the carriers sorta compete, but mainly have each hewed out their own markets. Instead of competing within the same overall market with phone manufacturers and service providers, instead there are about 5 major markets, each ruled by a carrier, and then the markets compete for each other.

      It's screwed up and bizzare.

      (I write software that ends up on shipping phones for various different CDMA carriers)

    11. Re:#1 by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Make a GSM phone and you don't have to find a carrier - all the subscriber needs to do is buy the phone and insert their SIM. Carrier be damned!

    12. Re:#1 by anothy · · Score: 1
      I contend that Apple partnered with Cingular because they are the largest carrier in the US...
      unlikely. more specifically, it was likely a prerequisite that the carrier in question be one of the big players, but not that they be the largest. Cingular, as you point out, is only the largest because of the AT&T buyout, and the growth curves have them falling behind Verizon again in relatively short order.
      ...and because Cingular would allow Apple to sell a phone that didn't get it music by buying from an over priced Verizon music store.
      this is an excellent point that i've not seen mentioned elsewhere. Verizon is very much into the "walled garden" approach - they want all the content put under their control. GSM operators tend to be more open to decentralized control. still, i suspect the biggest factor was the simple fact that GSM operators generally, and Cingular in particular, get slicker phones much sooner than Verizon, generally. there's no technical reason (i know of) the RAZR couldn't have been a CDMA phone.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    13. Re:#1 by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

      If the subscriber is buying the phone with no cross-subsidy from the network? Will be an expensive phone!

    14. Re:#1 by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Funny I heard that a large number of Asian countries use CDMA. Last time a checked that was a pretty big chunk of the world.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:#1 by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1
      Funny I heard that a large number of Asian countries use CDMA. Last time a checked that was a pretty big chunk of the world.

      In addition, Europe is slowly upgrading to a CDMA derivative ("3g") to replace their current TDMA-based GSM networks - technical details here.

  2. Yet more rumours by frankthechicken · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nice, but apparently it'll only hold 100 songs. And if that is true, it is not nearly enough capacity to make me switch from carrying both an MP3 player and a mobile.

    1. Re:Yet more rumours by Iriel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, I have a 60GB iPod and there's no way I'd switch to 100 songs from several thousand, however...

      If Apple's getting anything out of this, they're hoping more people may buy this instead of a Shuffle. ::looks down at cracked screen::
      "cuz like, I need a new phone anyway"

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    2. Re:Yet more rumours by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1

      ...this very well could be an "anti-rumor"; Apple's been bit hard in the past by the rumor mill raising expectations for their products to such a level that when the actual product comes out, there's palpable customer disappointment.

      It would be pretty clever if the folks at Apple are now seeding the rumor sites with unwhelming data points, so that when the actual product comes out, there's more excitement over the feature set as a result.

      Or maybe that's crazy talk; I agree, 100 songs would be teh suck.

      ~jeff

    3. Re:Yet more rumours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or maybe that's crazy talk; I agree, 100 songs would be teh suck.


      Because compared to how many songs your current phone holds that's ... what ... your current phone doesn't hold any songs.

      Yes, I can see why this new phone would be so much worse.
    4. Re:Yet more rumours by Glsai · · Score: 1

      My phone has 1 GB capacity for storing music. I could upgrade it to 2GB if I wasn't so cheap. Treo 600 works nice enough for music and I can always buy more sd cards to upgrade it to hold more.

    5. Re:Yet more rumours by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      I'd be just fine with it. I've got a 20 GB iPod, but if I'm just walking around campus and want to listen to a few tunes between classes or something, an iTunes phone would be perfect. I'd use my iPod for playing music at work and in my car on long trips.

    6. Re:Yet more rumours by McFadden · · Score: 1

      100 songs? And that's probably at a bitrate of 128kbps (or less). Let's be honest, so far manufacturers have shown how they just luuurve to inflate figures by quoting some total based on something lousy like 64kbps encoding. Want anything approaching decent sound and it could well drop down to 3 or 4 albums.

    7. Re:Yet more rumours by hattig · · Score: 1

      And that is why this isn't the big thing that Apple is going to release next week.

      I'm all hot for videoPods or lifePods or whatever they'll be called.

    8. Re:Yet more rumours by thekla · · Score: 1

      I believe the point would not be to get people switching now from iPods to iPhones.

      Apple has a perfect market for it in mobile phone devices. They are becoming extensions of people's hands, personal devices, and ultimately statements of style and/or status. (like cars, wristwatches, etc) Another particularity of the market is that advanced features (mp3, good cameras, mobile internet, etc) usually come out first on the hip 25-35yo devices. Nokia and S-E haven't yet managed to strike a design balance between hip and good-for-40yo-executive. And that's exactly where apple's product design strenth can be found. What's more, mobile phone purchasers tend to be very usability-conscious. Again, apple has top mindshare in usability perception.

      So, would a hip-but-elegant, high-end tech, very usable phone that doubles as a portable media player be successful in the market? In the EU market, which I know better, yes it would do great. Is apple, following the ipod success, the company to inspire consumers that their product has these qualities? Absolutely.

      A year ago, when I got my iPod, I thought: "these guys ought to making mobile phones".

      They are not canibalizing the iPod market. They are going for Nokia's market head-on. And in a couple of years, when mobile phone storage will be in the dozens of gigabytes, then they will canibalize iPod because it will be under attack by Nokia, Samsung and S-E.

      --
      -- say with me: i'm a monkey child
    9. Re:Yet more rumours by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Nice, but apparently it'll only hold 100 songs. And if that is true, it is not nearly enough capacity to make me switch from carrying both an MP3 player and a mobile.

      Then how is this even newsworthy? Even my old Motorola V710, has 200+ MP3 songs on it, and two movies.

      Let alone my SmartPhone with Windows PocketPC, which can hold 1,000s of songs, and even do remote desktop to any server I manage from anywhere in the world.

      Again, how is this going to be a great new innovation, other than them getting a big press release?

      Apple's Marketing machine does deserve kuddos, I think they are far smarter than the Apple developers. They could market toliet paper and have the world believe Apple invented it as well.

    10. Re:Yet more rumours by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      100 songs is about 10 hours worth. I agree, this is not nearly enough for people that go on 6 month trips to Antarctica.

      But for the rest of us mortals, 10 hours is way more then enough songs between when we leave home in the morning, and come home at night and plug the thing back in again.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    11. Re:Yet more rumours by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      That's what I do too, although the sound quality isn't as good as my iPod so I mostly use it for podcasts and audiobooks and carry my iPod around for music when I want it.

  3. New Phone...Damn by wknoxwalker · · Score: 1

    This is just a few days after I get my new windows based smart phone/PDA device... I'd actually sat there playing with it and wished apple made phones. Oh well. Another year to my next upgrade.

    1. Re:New Phone...Damn by b100dian · · Score: 1

      ..my new windows based smart phone/PDA..

      Have no fear, they'll port MacOS X on these in 2807!!

      --
      gtkaml.org
    2. Re:New Phone...Damn by Pennywisdom2099 · · Score: 1

      I feel bad for you if you think an Apple phone which holds 100 songs is better than a smartphone. You can get up to a 1gb mini sd card which will hold songs, ebooks, pictures, anything basically. I don't know how I lived without it =D

  4. World turning upside down by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple is releasing an iPod cell phone, while Nokia is releasing a tablet computer with no cell phone capabilities.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:World turning upside down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nokia used to own half the world's commercial forrests, so their no stranger to reinventing their corporate image

    2. Re:World turning upside down by daniil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard rumours about old Nokia-branded computers, but I've never seen one myself. I have, however, seen numerous Nokia computer screens (and TV-s) around. So, Nokia producing things other than cellphones is not really a miracle.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    3. Re:World turning upside down by GCsoftware · · Score: 1

      I can verify this, in fact the first computer I ever used was a MikroMikko II which was Nokia's version a sort-of-PC-compatible machine that were sold in Finland and the Nordic markets, at least.

      80186 based IIRC, MS-DOS with some weird Nokia modifications including a bunch of softkeys above the function key line that were application programmable, for example COMMAND.COM would map a series of DOS commands to each button.

      It was a replacement for the CP/M MikroMikko I and was replaced by a more standard 286/386 MikroMikko III.

    4. Re:World turning upside down by daniil · · Score: 1

      *slaps forehead* I had forgotten that the MikroMikko were built by Nokia. Not a wonder really, as it's probably been almost a decade since I saw one. But I distinctly remember that the first computer I played Wolfenstein on was a MikroMikko (with a black and white screen).

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    5. Re:World turning upside down by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Funny

      My dad used to have a pair of Nokia rubber boots.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    6. Re:World turning upside down by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      True. But, if the Nokia 770, which retails for $350 IIRC, will be as big as I think it will be, it will become what Apple's Newton should have been.

      Nokia's 770 is supposed to have automatic handwriting recognition, and its only input is a stylus. If the handwriting recognition is good, then it will be the succcessor to the Newton as far as handwriting recog capability.

      The 770 is larger than a palmtop computer, but still small and portable. It has a decent processor and therefore can have decent software on it, not like crappy palm.

      It goes for $350, and I think it's powerful enough to replace a laptop. With the small form factor, and the possibility of great handwriting recognition, then I think it has all the makings of a killer product. Nokia has a long history of making easy to use, high-quality product.

      If Apple's cell phone is as popular and easy to use as the iPod, and Nokia's 770 portable computer is just as popular and easy to use, then it will be time to turn in your compass -- the world really will have turned up side down ;)

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    7. Re:World turning upside down by dmccarty · · Score: 1
      Apple is releasing an iPod cell phone, while Nokia is releasing a tablet computer with no cell phone capabilities.

      And the world's best golfer is a black man while the best rapper is a white guy.

      What's this world coming to?

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    8. Re:World turning upside down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the Swiss winning the America's Cup!

    9. Re:World turning upside down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And America turning fascist!

  5. Fantastic! by adamwright · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now I can watch movie clips, read news AND listen to music using my mobile phone. However, every second voice conversation will still run to the lines of "Hello? Hello? Can you hear me? Is this better? Yes? OK...wait, I've lost you. Can you hear me? CAN YOU? I'll call you back. I'LL CALL YOU BACK".

    Fix your damned voice communications before you introduce more junk into handsets. I have a perfectly good MP3 player, but I still lack a useful phone!

    1. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Motorola T720 that works great as far as a cell phone. I recommend it.

      your paneling anonymous coward

    2. Re:Fantastic! by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey! You forgot the camara. God I love that feature!

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:Fantastic! by MaestroSartori · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Was gonna mod this, but I decided to reply...

      Motorola actually do make decent phones for talking to people on. My V3 RAZR has excellent clarity and (for me) a decent battery life. It comes with loads of other crap on it that I don't use, yes, including a camera, but it's easily the best mobile I've had (which list includes Nokias, Ericsson both pre and post Sony, and Siemens).

      Most of the time when I get a dodgy-sounding connection, it's the other person's phone or just poor signal. But that isn't the fault of the handset developers, because most people I know have older phones, and live in areas with poor signals.

      I've briefly tried current offerings from Nokia and Sony, and they also seem fairly clear when used in areas of good reception. Where they could definitely be improved, IMO, is that they're often too quiet, and that outside noise leaks in too much. Not sure how they might tackle that, but then I'm just a games programmer. Your mileage may vary, of course, but it does seem like handsets are improving in those core areas as well as the useless attachments...

    4. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Can you hear me? CAN YOU? I'll call you back. I'LL CALL YOU BACK".
      What is this? The 90's? Oh, I forgot, it's the US of A.

    5. Re:Fantastic! by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey! You forgot the camara. God I love that feature!</sarcasm>

      I dunno if that's a camera or a camaro, but hey, I'll take my photo-taking, fast-moving, phone-calling machine any day. Now if only my phone had an electric razor..

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    6. Re:Fantastic! by j3tt · · Score: 3, Funny

      You should go with Verizon. I remember they went around the country repeatedly checking with the other end - "Can you hear me now?"

    7. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      1995 called, it wants its mobile back.

      Seriously, what handset do you have? Wait, you live in the UK - man, you need to talk to your provider. I get better quality reception on my mobile than on a normal landline. Go to carphone warehouse, they'll sort you out

    8. Re:Fantastic! by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      I have to agree... my mp3 player is 2 years old (Creative Zen) and runs amazingly still.. My cell phone.. well... I spent $100 to 'upgrade' my phone when i got it, and nowadays its crap... areas i used to get signal I dont anymore, all sending/recieving has been slacking... just want to run my phone over already...

    9. Re:Fantastic! by Name+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      I want a decent phone. I do not want it to be a digital camera as well. There are various places that ban cameras that make such a phone less useful. After all, how useful is a phone that you can't have with you?

    10. Re:Fantastic! by Lellor · · Score: 1

      It's not just the US - I have similar problems up here in Lumby (Canada). I agree fully with the grandparent - just make phones that work well for their intended purpose - making and receiving phone calls.

      I have an MP3 player in my car, a DVD player, a PC at home and at work, a laptop, and a regular iPod - all of which play MP3s flawlessly. It would be nice to have a decent, simple, reliable handset without any additional features (just text messages and voice capabilities)!

      --
      Liberal Ontarians and French Quebecers are draining Western Canada's wealth. Stop them now! Support Western separatism.
    11. Re:Fantastic! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Nokia 6800.

      The only phone I could find with email access and a keyboard but no camera for under many hundreds of dollors.

      The Blackberries are too expensive and the sidekicks have cameras.

      The web-browsing sucks though but I can get directions, look up numbers check and send email all for free.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:Fantastic! by dyefade · · Score: 1

      No doubt you'll get plenty of replies saying the same thing: it's 2005! If you still have problems with the quality of reception on your mobile, you need to change providers. In the five years I've been a regular mobile user, I've never had any issues with quality or service.
      While I'm not likely to get a phone from Apple, this is still exciting technology, just because YOU are behind in other areas, don't begrudge others of benefits like this.

      Disclaimer: I'm in the UK, which has comprehensive coverage, especially in urban areas. I suppose, if you live in the sticks, you will still have problems, but you don't give details of this, so I wouldn't know.

    13. Re:Fantastic! by ytm · · Score: 1

      It's popular here to bash cellphones with cameras, but they are actually useful. Of course not as a device to make photographs, get a real camera for that.
      I use camera in my cellphone mainly to take snapshots of useful information like public communication timetables, 1-2 pages of book in library instead asking for a copy of them, etc.

    14. Re:Fantastic! by Iriel · · Score: 1

      Motorola does have some decent phones and most of the trouble I've had is with Nokia, but I had to point out one thing:

      No offense (seriously, no offense meant at all) but it's a bad example to say that the phone that gives good performance cost as much as some PDA's and iPods ($300 at first) and also had problems early on getting carriers to insure because they were too fragile (Cingular in PA, USA wouldn't give insurance on them because they broke too easily after they were first released). :p

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    15. Re:Fantastic! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it cost that much at first, but right now you can get the V3 for free. No, I don't work for Orange, that was just the first link on a google for "V3 RAZR".

    16. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the time when I get a dodgy-sounding connection, it's the other person's phone

      My phone is perfect.
      No, I can't always hear the other person, but that must be their fault because I chose correctly.

    17. Re:Fantastic! by neoform · · Score: 5, Funny

      man, what's with all these people and they're broken xml.. i believe you need to open a tag prior to closing it.. otherwise the parser will just ignore your sarcasm.. i know my brain's parser did.

      *shakes head*

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    18. Re:Fantastic! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I'm becoming convinced that cellphone service in the U.K. must be FAR superior to what we deal with in the U.S.

      First, I complained about the contracts most of us get locked into, and someone from the U.K. laughed at my message - saying he "knew almost nobody still using a cellphone under contract". (Pay-as-you-go phones in the U.S. are *far* more expensive to use, and are generally sold to teens/kids and people with poor credit who can't get service any other way.)

      Now, I see this talk about phone reception! I've been a Verizon wireless customer since they bought out my original carrier, Cybertel, years and years ago. Compared to most other providers I've used, I've had pretty good luck getting a signal wherever I go. But what I've noticed is, a *dual mode* analog and digital phone is a MUST with them. My new Treo 650 only works in digital, and when I start walking around indoors - my calls often start "breaking up" or people miss some of the words I say. On my older phone, you'd sometimes see it drop back to analog mode, which usually saved it from doing any of this. The ability to switch to analog mode also let me use my phones pretty far out in the middle of nowhere. When I went camping, for example, I could still get a usable analog signal with Verizon, but not a digital one. My friends who went with me taking their Sprint or Cingular phones, by contrast, had "no service", period.

      One of my friends with Sprint always gets other calls "bleeding over" onto hers, too. The person on the other end never hears any of it, but she hears a phone ringing, someone answering, and can often hear the entire conversation in the background.

      Practically everyone I know has *some* kind of reception complaint with their cellphone. It's crazy (at least in the U.S.) to make the statemnt that they're "just as clear as land lines". Only in perfect circumstances.

    19. Re:Fantastic! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Go Go Gadget Electric Razor!!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    20. Re:Fantastic! by avsed · · Score: 2, Informative

      V3 - great phone, absolutely DIRE interface. Really, Microsoft would have done a better job on their UI (and they would have done, their phones are at least more usable). Crap predictive text (uses a last used algorithm, not most commonly used, so "IF" and "HE" get swapped round at random. Totally dire address book (won't display number when you're entering a text, so you don't know if a name refers to a landline, mobile, or work line), can only search address book based on first character (nice one motorola). And to top it all off, completely mis-leading dialogs - for example, if someone calls whilst you're in the middle of retreiving a message, you can't terminate the call to the answering service by hitting end call - because that terminates the call you haven't answered! Seriously, if you think the V3 is a good phone, you need to try more phones!

    21. Re:Fantastic! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Or, I could be prevented from entering secure facilities (ie factories, certain offices, Acme Supermarkets) with a camera built into my telephone. It would be nice to have a cameraphone, but I don't feel like having two cell phones. If I ever feel the need to take quick 'n dirty snapshots, I'll pick up one of those Phillips USB memory sticks with built-in camera.

    22. Re:Fantastic! by huckleup · · Score: 1
      Not really trying to apologize for the poor coverage in US, but you might want to consider that the size of the UK is about the size of Michigan. Then there's 49 other states to take into account.

      Area of UK: 94,525 sq. mi.
      Area of US: 3,537,441 sq. mi.

      That makes the US about 37 times the size of the UK - a slightly larger technical/economical challenge.

    23. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *they are* broken XML?

      Their, not they're.

    24. Re:Fantastic! by myov · · Score: 1

      It depends on your experience. I had a Mot i60 (with the iDEN radio feature) that spent more time in repair than I actually had it. I suspected it was a bad SIM the whole time, but nobody wanted to listen. I gave up and lived with it resetting itself randomly, and crashing when I tried to answer a call.

      The current phones could be just fine, but between the PPC mess and the i60 I don't see any reason to get a Motorola product again.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    25. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I can watch movie clips, read news AND listen to music using my mobile phone. However, every second voice conversation will still run to the lines of "Hello? Hello? Can you hear me? Is this better? Yes? OK...wait, I've lost you. Can you hear me? CAN YOU? I'll call you back. I'LL CALL YOU BACK".

      Fix your damned voice communications before you introduce more junk into handsets. I have a perfectly good MP3 player, but I still lack a useful phone!


      Ok What moron modded the above comment insightful. How? Oh it shows me he probably uses a shit network that has barely any coverage..that's insightful, trying to blame handsets for network issues is retarded and is the same as bitching about your car when the roads are shit...get a fucking decent carrier already you cheap bastard and you won't have these issues..funny, here in the states I use Verizon and I get better coverage and no connections issues even when I am in thick walled building where everyone's same phone but on cingular doesn't work worth shit...IT'S THE DAMN NETWORK YOU PUTZ..

    26. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dire?

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    27. Re:Fantastic! by rekoil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another big factor is the ubitiqousness of GSM in Europe, which means that any phone can roam on anyone's tower, assuming roaming agreements are in place - you don't have several incompatible standards like you do in the US. This also allows commercial buildings to install GSM amps/repeaters, which increases indoor signal quality dramatically for every mobile inside - you'd need a box that speaks GSM, CDMA, TDMA, and whatever-the-hell-Nextel-uses to accomplish the same goal here.

      Also, SIMs make it *much* easier to switch carriers in Europe, which means more competition, which means shorter contracts, lower prices, and better customer service. Oh yeah, and cooler phones.

      Not that I'm jealous.

    28. Re:Fantastic! by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, what's with all these people and their broken grammar? I believe you need to use "their," not "they're," in your sentence. Otherwise ./'ers with nothing better to do will just make fun of your post. I know I did.

      :-P

    29. Re:Fantastic! by vonwilkenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The handset is 50% of the network. If you use the free/cheapo phone that comes with a plan, your call quality will reflect it. The RAZR is a good phone because it contains a good transciever. All too often I see people balk at paying $200 for a good wireless handset and then complain that their service sucks. It makes a difference.

      I have a friend that claims he "should not have to buy a phone because he is buying the service". I lagh (intentional poor spelling for the nazi's) and ask him what model TV he got when he sighend up for CATV, or what kind of PC did he get for subscribing to AOL.

      As for the parent's comment that providers should improve the network, Wireless telephony is one of the most capital intensive industries. There would be blanket coverage if everyone was willing to pay $300/month. Also, blame your local government officials and zoning boards that deny zoning variances and permits to build cell sites where they are needed.

    30. Re:Fantastic! by dyefade · · Score: 1

      You make a very good point, and one which can be compared to the fact that Japan is even further ahead in terms of coverage.

      Not being a technician of any sort in this field, I can't comment for sure, but while it's true that the US is (37 times) bigger than the UK, so is the population, and therefore the opportunity for investment. I'm sure I'm taking a over simplistic view though.

      Which begs the question: why is coverage so poor? Do big companies like Sprint and Cingular (and Verison? I don't know any of these companies, just copying what others wrote), not feel the need to invest in better coverage? This brings us back to the original posters complaint.

    31. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live? I know Boston, NY, LA, Washington DC, hell even Kansas City and Des Moines all have spotless coverage. (I use Verizon.)

    32. Re:Fantastic! by huckleup · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but while it's true that the US is (37 times) bigger than the UK, so is the population, and therefore the opportunity for investment

      I think the logistics just don't scale so easily. I think many people outside of the US think of it as just another country, but it is really almost like 50 different countries with different cultures, demographics, geographies, laws etc. Even more when you consider the differences between say Northern/Central/Southern California.

      For instance I live in Central California which is full of mountains and gulches and such. Even in Silicon Valley, which you would think would be an obvious focus area, there are stretches of open grazing ranges and rolling hills in between the clusters of activity. So just driving 20 minutes from San Jose to Palo Alto I can't guarantee I'll get a connection. I generally don't have coverage problems in any 'downtown' areas, just in areas where one could see there might be difficulties.

      As far as coverage in the rural parts of the country, I can't imagine how companies could justify cell towers in places where the population density is low. Just as a reference, compare the overall population density of the UK versus US:

      UK: 244.7 people per sq. km
      US: 29.7 people per sq. km

      and then you compare the individual states:

      New Jersey: 438.00 people per sq. km
      California: 83.85 people per sq. km
      Wyoming: 1.96 people per sq. km.

      So it makes sense that the providers will focus on local solutions and there will be lots of dead spots in between. Quite the challenge, I'd say.

    33. Re:Fantastic! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Motorola actually do make decent phones for talking to people on.

      Perhaps, but if so they also make really crappy phones. The interface on my motorola phone is so bad it takes a minimum of 6 key-presses to select someone from your phone book and call them. You can, however, buy a new "wallpaper" for your phone's background (which will automatically be added to your bill) by dropping it. Great idea making that the single easiest thing to do. Also, it is a flip phone, but they helpfully included buttons on the outside of the phone and no way to lock them. As a result my phone must be in silent mode all the time or I beep as I walk as the buttons are constantly pressed. Motorola needs to hire a few good UI designers, if not they sure won't ever get my money again.

    34. Re:Fantastic! by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

      I don't recognise that anymore. I think reception issues depend more on your choice of network than the phone itself.

      On the other hand, I miss my T10. Small, light, with a ridiculously long battery capacity (2 weeks plus) and no fancy gizmos. Ah well.

    35. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, what's with all these posters inverting the dot and the slash? I believe you need to use "/." and not "./" in your sentence. Otherwise, /.ers with nothing better to do will make fun of your post.

    36. Re:Fantastic! by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Or maybe you need to try more V3's (the other guy notes that he has tried MANY phones).

      The predictive text has its strengths as well (though it needs to insert spaces automatically...)
      The address book works fine when you change some settings. It handles multiple numbers just fine as long as you are intelligent to realize that the picture of the phone means "mobile" and the picture of the house means "home" etc.
      The first character search is usually enough to get you close, but it is easily fixed with a newer firmware.

      With the calls, of course when someone calls you (and the menus switch to incomming call) the button is going to terminate the incomming call since thats what its asking about...

      Its a great phone when you just want a phone...I do wish that they had ditched the camera as its crap (just like all the other phones) and replaced it with EDGE but for some reason the public loves buying camera phones.

      --
      Bottles.
    37. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but you must be the lucky exception from the rule! I don't know anybody who's Motorola phone wasn't broken at least twice in two years.

      I only had one once. (Nobody has a Motorola more than once. I bought mine in the middle nineties when Motorola already had a rep of producing cool looking phones that don't work. I asked the guy at the shop about that and he told me "Oh, that got better, really!" - Cocksucker!) My phone was broken six times in two years. When sending it in for repairs it took about three weeks to return - sometimes repaired, sometimes unrepaired, sometimes repaired but another part broken. Of course I didn't get a substitute during repairs and calling the callcenter was, well, like calling a callcenter. Once it came back repaired and working but with a battery cover of another colour. That was fun!

      Did it get better? Recently I asked the lady at a Vodafone shop about those sleek looking Razrs. Answer: "Um, these are desinged to look really good, but if you need a phone for your job or so you should probably have another model stand-by." And remember, she gets *paid* for selling phones!

      I can't believe that Apple is teamig up with a company that is known for producing junk for over a decade! I mean they don't ship their Powerbooks with Windows 98 installed or do they?

    38. Re:Fantastic! by rhandir · · Score: 1
      You are right. The handset is 50% of the network. But what apple is (potentially) doing is creating a handset that might actually be worth 200$.

      Let's think about it. I don't want to go anywhere without my ipod. I can't go anywhere without my cellphone. (It's just not practical. I'd throw it away if I could.)

      • What if...my cellphone didn't suck?
      • What if...I didn't have to wonder if that 200$ cellphone wasn't going to be compatible with someone else's network when I move/the plan expires.
      • What if...I DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY FOR RINGTONES!!!!!!
    39. Re:Fantastic! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dotslashers?

      What is this "dotslash" that you speak of?

      (Slashdot's Razor: Never make fun of someone else's error, or you will make an error in your post too.)

    40. Re:Fantastic! by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know it's a joke, but they really do send people out to test reception in the same way as the commercial. I know an engineer from Verizon Wireless who was offered a chance visit France and Belgium, follow a predefined route, and every 10 miles call in to check the reception.

    41. Re:Fantastic! by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Man, what's with all these people and their useless replies? What ever happened to people that actually ADDRESSED THE COMMENT and it's point?

      The parent poster clearly [no pun intended] has either bad phone reception or a bad cell provider; or he lives in a very rural area. I'm not saying that my service is better because I have 7 million neighbors in my town, but I am implying that bigger cities have more phun. ;)

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    42. Re:Fantastic! by PunkRockMonkey · · Score: 1

      Its is the possessive form of it.

      It's is a contraction of it is or it has.

      (I'm sorry. I couldn't resist.)

  6. iphone.org by hytmal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    maybe FINALLY apple will be taking advantage of the fact that they have ownership of iphone.org ( http://samspade.org/t/whois?a=iphone.org&server=au to&_charset_=UTF-8&btnGo=Whois )

      -- hytmal

    1. Re:iphone.org by kulakovich · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      drat - I don't know how you got this in before me! double drat!

      /your speed is teh superior.

      kulakovich

    2. Re:iphone.org by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need whois to tell you that. type www.iphone.org in your browser, you'll see the Apple website coming up !

    3. Re:iphone.org by hytmal · · Score: 1

      kthxlol! i was saddened that i did not get teh fr1st p0st ;-; -- hytmal

    4. Re:iphone.org by adrizk · · Score: 1

      Well, really, anyone could have just bought iphone.org and pointed it to apple.com. ..actually that would be a great way to start rumors... hmm..

    5. Re:iphone.org by Bob+Wehadababyitsabo · · Score: 1

      Along with http://www.mammals.org/ . Still haven't figured that one out

      --
      fsck -u
    6. Re:iphone.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mighty Mouse?

      : )

    7. Re:iphone.org by frostilicus2 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, NetCraft it showing some recent activity on that domain - http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=iphone.or g.

      --
      Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
    8. Re:iphone.org by kulakovich · · Score: 1

      ])00]) ! M()d pwn3d me !!1! teh su>
      ok that was fun.

      tnx.

      kulakovich

  7. Disk drive? by hydrino · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this will have a disk drive, Edge and WiFi? If not, I hope there are miniSD expansion slots.
    If they do that and allow me to sync with outlook.

    If it can do all that, it'll be a smartphone killer

    1. Re:Disk drive? by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Hah, I honestly doubt it'll have any of that.

      It's probably a port of the iPod interface in software, with the iPod shuffle's hardware player, tied into Motorola's cellphone. Nothing too complicated really, and it fits with the need for Apple to get more flash ram, now (as moving parts plus cellphones equals dead device).

      I'll still get one, even if it means my Treo 600 will have to take the backseat for a while.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:Disk drive? by DenDave · · Score: 1

      I'd be impressed if it synced with iSync....

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    3. Re:Disk drive? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Which could be interesting .. if they use the ipod touch wheel you could do away with those silly small keys and have a rather cool emulation of finger stop dialling

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  8. Branding by StacyWebb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not really a matter of new technology, but rather a matter of branding. The Apple iTunes name sells. This behavior is being done by many corporations. Virgin started it along with 7-eleven. Next to appear on the scene is Disney Mobile (not making this up). Names sell, so individuals who are dedicated to Apple and it's products will most likley purchase this type of phone/service.

    1. Re:Branding by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Yes but apple is different, if their phone is white and stylish like their other products, it will sell.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Branding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a matter of technology. If some cel phone company started building phones that were half as good as the stuff Apple routinely makes, they'd take over in no time.

      Apple's brand is valuable, but it's valuable *because* they make good stuff. The iPod is killer because it's good, not just because it's Apple; Apple's brand is valuable *because* of the iPod, not the other way around. (I can name several Apple products that never made it, despite the fruit logo.)

      It's not that we're so crazy we'll buy anything with an Apple logo on it; it's that cel phones are so *bad* that we're desparate for something that doesn't totally suck, and Apple happens to be one of the few companies that can do it.

    3. Re:Branding by revscat · · Score: 1

      Names sell, so individuals who are dedicated to Apple and it's products will most likley purchase this type of phone/service.

      While that is certainly true, it also helps that Apple has a history of making high-quality hardware. Apple got their name not just because of clever marketing and lucky breaks, although there was certainly some of that. Apple is respected because people for the most part feel that the products Apple sells are high quality *and* beautiful. (In fact, I seem to remember reading somewhere that Jobs believes those two things to be largely inseparable.)

    4. Re:Branding by ase · · Score: 1

      If this really is an Apple-branded phone (or other device), that is, an Apple version of a product otherwise available without the Apple logo, then Apple is treading ground that it hasn't visited in quite some time (mugs and T-shirts aside). Apple designs and manufactures (or contracts to manufacture) everything it sells under its brand name. It has been a long time since Apple has tried to sell someone else's product by slapping their logo on it. In fact, I can't remember the last time. Is this a first for them? Time to put that brand value to work.

  9. It's the first time for me and I can't resist... by webgrappa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...will it run Linux? (Sorry for this)

  10. uhm.. IPHONE.ORG ? by kulakovich · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Maybe if I put it in all caps people will listen this time. =)

    kulakovich

    1. Re:uhm.. IPHONE.ORG ? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I, for one, would welcome an Apple cell phone ... not sure that mixing cell phones with iPods is a good idea though.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:uhm.. IPHONE.ORG ? by kulakovich · · Score: 1


      Ok, it is in the domain name record that Apple owns iPhone.org - how the heck is that offtopic?

  11. Not a terrible idea by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but I'm sure it won't fare nearly as well as the iPod itself. People get tired of their cell phones after a while. Especially when something new and flashy comes out.

    Gadgets really shouldn't require contracts.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    1. Re:Not a terrible idea by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Gadgets really shouldn't require contracts.

      Part of the problem is that the price of the gadget, the phone, is subsidized by the service contract. So the price looks good but only because you have to buy the service. If you don't want the contract or the benefit of that subsidy, you have to buy an unlocked phone, which can be a lot more expensive. The problem there is I don't know if the unlocked device will work with the no-contract services.

      But then, phone services don't require that you use the same phone during the entire contract, buy a new phone and they'll switch it over to the new phone.

      I think it is wasteful to go through a new phone every year. I hope not too many good phones just get recycled.

    2. Re:Not a terrible idea by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      "but I'm sure it won't fare nearly as well as the iPod itself"

      I don't think it's supposed to. Besides, how could it, or anything else for that matter, actually "fare better" than the iPod has? No, I don't think 85% of the cell phone market would be the goal. The cell phone market today is vastly different than the portable music player market was when the iPod was introduced.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    3. Re:Not a terrible idea by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Then go shop on Ebay. You can get a pretty good provider-unlocked GSM phone for under $100 if you want to get a phone for contract-prices without getting a contract. I picked up an unlocked Motorola T725 worldphone for something like $60US. Not much on nifty features, but it's tri-band and gets great reception everywhere. I saw some old blackberries with Buy It Now prices of under $100.

  12. The 2G iPod Shuffle by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks like this ROKR phone is kinda the 2nd Generation iPod Shuffle.
    - It is a small unit with minila but reasonable capacity via Flash
    - Smaller than a pack of gum, more like a piece of gum stuck to your cell phone
    - Now Suffle detractors get their screen and basically a free ride on the battery life of a much larger capacity battery too
    - Still priced at a minimal premium

    I have also read that the software people have seen is a music player only, not iTMS integration for buying tracks, so this will sync with
    - iTunes
    - Address Book
    - Calendar events?
    - To Dos?

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:The 2G iPod Shuffle by cranky_slacker · · Score: 0

      Why would you need DOS support? Maybe it'll run OS Warp too....

  13. Not even... by Poromenos1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...if it had 40 GB capacity would I buy this. Then I would be stuck forever with this cellphone (which, for all I know, could be crappy) and I wouldn't buy a new one even if this got old because I would already have a half-decent cellphone I'd have to carry around with me because it's also my mp3 player.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Not even... by interiot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I won't buy that because it has features that I like too much."

      Yeah, that makes perfect sense. No, it really does.

  14. sounds good by flynt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wireless.
    More space than a nomad.
    Sweet.

    1. Re:sounds good by cciRRus · · Score: 1

      And it doesn't ship with a virus. :)

      --
      w00t
  15. Re:Another rumor by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Wow. Really? I wonder what color it will be!

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  16. Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think such a big event (hype?) for a 3rd part product anyway.

    More likely a brand new product. I still hope for a serious Media Center.

  17. Secretive by jurt1235 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quote: The companies have declined to confirm or deny the report, which would fit Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day.

    Should read:

    The companies have declined to confirm or deny the report, which would fit Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day, and sue everybody who brings out the real news for being correct and taking away the spotlight of apple.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    1. Re:Secretive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote: The companies have declined to confirm or deny the report, which would fit Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day, and sue everybody who brings out the real news for being correct and taking away the spotlight of apple.

      Should read:

      The companies have declined to confirm or deny the report, which would fit Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day, and sue everybody who knowlingly obtain trade secrets in violation of an NDA and (not surprisingly) bring out the real news for having too much time on their hands and taking away the spotlight of apple.

  18. 100 songs? No way! by jtangen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The advertisement for the event reads: "1,000 songs in your pocket changed everything... Here we go again". Do you really think that Apple would release a phone that holds 100 songs? My bet is a video iPod and iTunes 5 that will provide music video and movie content through the iTunes Music Store.

  19. Re:Another rumor by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 0
    will that be called iBART?

    Subway system it is not, but any new gas smell in there would be an improvement over the current smell they got going on...

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
  20. au revoir Verizon by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm so glad I ignored all of Verizon's "special offers," tempting me to renew my contract that will expire in a month.

    If Apple/Motorola do release an iPod phone, and it's good, I'll ditch Verizon in a heartbeat. And I'll send them a letter telling them how much I resent their effort to control what kind of tecnology they'll allow on their network. They want to gouge me for songs the way they gouge you for ringtones. Screw that!

    1. Re:au revoir Verizon by ChrisF79 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm just too apathetic, but do you really think writing a letter is going to do you any good? These big companies don't care about our correspondence. Chances are, it'll be read (if you're lucky) by a customer service rep in a cubicle, then tossed aside before anybody of any value sees it.

      And for the record, I think we'll see the ipod/phone from Apple soon enough, but I really don't think that's what we're going to see on Sept. 7th. My vote goes to the video iPod and iTunes 5.

      --
      Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    2. Re:au revoir Verizon by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 1

      If enough customers leave them on account of customer-hostile policy X, they will re-evaluate X out of pure self-interest.

      If customers leave them on account of X but don't say so, they have no way of making that connection.

      There's nothing to lose (and a lot to gain) by telling a company why you're dissatisfied.

  21. Almost there... by lbmouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just need to add a PDA, WiFi, 80GB removable HD, 6MP camera w/video, DVR, GPS, and a tissue dispenser... then, "hook it to my veins!"

    1. Re:Almost there... by 5.11Climber · · Score: 1

      You forgot the huge friggin' battery needed to drive all of this. Unless of course you only intend to run the unit for 5 minutes.

      --
      Arf!
    2. Re:Almost there... by lbmouse · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Almost there... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Actually, a higher quality camera and a GPS wouldn't be too bad. I'm using a Motorola v265. Pretty decent color flip phone with some lame toy camera built into it. The interface for using the camera isn't too bad, but the quality STINKS, and without some hacking around you have to go through Verizon to get the pictures back off.

      If that camera were closer to 3MP or so (I think it's less than 1MP in reality), and it let you easily hook up a USB cable to the computer to retrieve data, then it wouldn't be a bad accessory at all. Wouldn't be a good main camera (no optical zoom), but it could actually serve as more than a toy. I generally only have my digicam with me if I go on a trip or somewhere that I think I'll need to take pictures; the cell phone (and it's camerca) is always with me.

      I also use a relatively cheap Magellan 315 GPS when I'm flying to navigate between airports and VOR stations. The entire data set for this is less than 8mb. This seems like funtionality that could easily be integrated into a cell phone.

      Instead though we can PDA cell phones; IMHO a PDA is pretty much the *LEAST* integratable device for merging with a cell phone. The screen is WAY too small on a standard cell phone, and if they make it big enough to use comfortably as a PDA then it feels like you're holding a brick up to your ear and talking. Oh well. Maybe they'll get it right one day.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:Almost there... by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      Hey, that strategy worked out with the PSP.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
  22. Say it with me... by jbrelie · · Score: 5, Funny

    iTones.

    1. Re:Say it with me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has truly frightening implications.

  23. Yes, just like the ipod by Knome_fan · · Score: 1

    Ooops, wait, the ipod seems to appeal to a much larger userbase than those who you like to call Apple-fanoys [sic!] so why shouldn't this be the case with this device?

    Seriously, I think combining an ipod with a mobile phone just makes too much sense not to do it.

    And considering that mobile phones for many people have become life style articles and the ipod itself is one of the most successful life style articles, I think this could be a hughe success.

    1. Re:Yes, just like the ipod by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

      This is also a smart move by apple since lots of cellphones are starting to offer MP3 playback. If they can make enough hype to surround the ipod cellphones they could end up being a big player in the cellphone industry.

      --
      Silly rabbit
  24. Cool... by ph4te · · Score: 0, Troll

    It will be at the low, low Apple price of $499.99 for the 64MB model!

    --
    OMG SOEMOEN SI H4X0RING MAI B0X3N!1!
  25. WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by Wonderkid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. There is all this speculation over a) A video iPod, yet sales of portable video devices have not taken off, unlike MP3 players before the iPod was first launched. b) An iTunes equipped phone. 2. Here are some things to think about: a) The cell phone / mobile phone networks are in a mess and not global, while WiFi is a global standard. b) The future lies in VoIP. c) The iPod OS contains an address book and a huge hard drive. Therefore, 3. An iPod with built in WiFi would be a global carrier free product and liberate people from the need to use a Mac or PC to purchase/download/sync their tunes and other data, they would simply login to the nearest WiFi network. Syncing with any Mac or PC would be wireless too which would be sweet. 4. Consider that a music playing PHONE is not original, the excellent Sony Ericsson K750i and K800 phones already do this well - and include well reviewed 2MP cameras too. (See http://www.fonebox.com/matrix ) 5. I vote for a wireless iPod as being what Apple SHOULD do, perhaps with a 2MP digicam on the back too.

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

    1. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by mrch0mp3rs · · Score: 1

      A WiFi equipped iPod? It exists. It's called the PlayStation Portable. It has WiFi built in, with a browser, plays mp3s, mp4s, m4as and video games.

      I can play all the media I can play in iTunes (save my purchased music pre-Jhymn). And, I can play multiplayer Lumines.

      That said, as an owner of three iPods, a PowerBook, a DP PowerMac, an iBook and a lifelong Apple nerd -- I'll probably bite on whatever new product Apple comes out with. I'm Apple's whore.

      --
      --- -a- "I'd love to change the world, but it'd be easier if the universe exposed its API."
    2. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by Wonderkid · · Score: 1

      The PSP is seriously flawed. a) It is too big to carry everywhere (gym etc) and b) Lacks mass storage. The overpriced UMD drive will do to Sony what Minidisc did to them: Restrict the product to specific markets who don't mind the inconvenience of expensive mechanical mass storage. An iPod has huge internal storage capacity, and a new device with WiFi and a larger screen will not only double as a phone, but could be used for gaming. It's the resolution of the screen that counts, NOT the size. Check out some of the latest phones with small but high res screens and you will be surprised.

      --

      O'WONDERWe're working on it.

    3. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by SpotBug · · Score: 1


      1. All a) those b) numbers 2. and a) letters 3. make a) your 4. post a) very b) hard c) to 5. comprehend.

      --
      cygnuhchur
    4. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by EchoMirage · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wonderkid wrote:
      a) A video iPod, yet sales of portable video devices have not taken off, unlike MP3 players before the iPod was first launched.

      There were [meaningful] MP3 player sales before the iPod? Really? Where? Who had them?

      The cell phone / mobile phone networks are in a mess and not global, while WiFi is a global standard.

      Say it with me: regulations, regulations, regulations. Cell phone networks are a mess and non-global because most countries strictly control which radio frequencies are available to telecom carriers for mobile communications, and many countries license incompatible frequencies. Take something as simple as GSM, for instance. In the United States, GSM is licensed in the 850MHz and 1900MHz bands, while in most of Europe, it's licensed in the 900MHz and 1800MHz bands. Mobile carriers have no control over this: it's the government regulators' decisions. Geographic problems affect network technology also. The U.S. has GSM and CDMA as its major digital technologies; parts of Asia are strongly CDMA, while Europe, Africa, and the Middle East are GSM.

      It also isn't true to say that "WiFi is a global standard." Even with WiFi, some areas of the world (think Japan) regulate some of the bands that WiFi occupies differently than other countries. What is true of WiFi is that there isn't a [strong] competing wireless network technology alongside it, e.g. there isn't the CDMA/GSM division in WiFi. That is, until WiMax takes off.

      The future lies in VoIP.

      Maybe, but that's a more distant future than the next 3-5 years. Decent VoIP transmission requires significant bandwidth; this rules out the cellular network de facto for the next few years. VoIP over WiFi requires something that WiFi lacks: meaningful QoS. Know why you don't see business switching to wireless VoIP by the truckload? QoS. Even without the QoS problem, there are plenty of other still-present deficiencies in WiFi that make it currently unsuitable for VoIP. Security is one of them; we just this year finally got a good, workable, robust wireless security paradigm in the form of 802.11i. So far, I've seen zero wireless VoIP handsets that support WPA2. Most companies won't trust their voice communications to WEP, and rightly so. Conservative estimates give 3 years before 802.11i and its affiliated technologies really bunker down and start to take root.

      Syncing with any Mac or PC would be wireless too which would be sweet.

      Everybody keeps complaining to Apple about not having any wireless options in the iPod. Well, there's a good reason they don't: speed. It takes 10-15 minutes to fill my 4G iPod mini over FireWire; that's with FireWire's 400Mbps non-peak-throughput speeds. Bluetooth 1.x crawls along at about 1Mbps in really good conditions. The best WiFi we have is the 125Mbps "Super G", although actual throughput is only 30-45Mbps at best. Now, let's say that instead of a 4G iPod mini, I have a 60G iPod with color display. How long is it going to take me to fill up my 60G iPod over my 125Mbps WiFi connection? Long enough for me to decide it's not worth it.

      Consider that a music playing PHONE is not original

      It's not done really well by anybody yet, in the same way that MP3 wasn't done well by anybody before the iPod (and with the exception of the iPod, still isn't). Sure, many people can "figure out" the current MP3 phones after significant hassle, in the same way many people could "figure out" the early Rios and Nomads, but like the MP3 player market, sales have shown that when it comes to portable entertainment, the public does not want to be hassled. If you disagree, Apple has a US$4B yearly iPod business for you to argue with.

      perhaps with a 2MP digicam on the back too.

      Apple [fortunately] only does technology that it knows it can do really well. Cameras consist of a lot more than a plastic lens and an OEMed CCD. Apple is very unlikely to get [back] into cameras; there's more in cameras than they know about, and anyway, just about everybody already has a decent (e.g. >2MP) digital camera, plus three or four others in their cell phones, PDAs, shoes, etc. The iPod really doesn't need a camera.

    5. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

      I think you're a little too hard on our poster's enthusiasm. Your points on regulation belie the fact that it Corps support lobbyists to obtain regulation as a means to protect markets.

      To serve your argument that VoIP is a non-starter, the all-or-nothing cynicism misses the opportunity. Like the iPOD (its not everything), iPHONE needs only do what it does BETTER than anything else out there. Apple has loads of resources a phone could use over WiFi without carrying voice-alone. Voice could Surprise! still be carrier based (your fav). WiFI integrated with cell phone means music, address book, wiki's, etc...

      Mostly what Apple does really well is not technology based superiority. Apple ONLY does what will sell more APPLE products. iPHONE doesn't sell a single piece of Apple product. Apple are a software co. that does hardware which means that they get to integrate (read transparentize) technology where others have to show all the ugly plumbing.

      You're right Camera's are a Jobs NO-NO, not because they don't do photo. Camera's violate the rule of identity. Phones are phones/Cameras - cameras. There is little synergy from such an integration.

      So anything you're likely to see from Apple next week is going to play well Worldwide, with others and with Apple products. Wifi is in there, its Apple's infrastructure upon which their franchise is steamrolling the competition right now. Oh yeah, it'll work WiFi.

    6. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing to note, your iPod isn't getting anywhere near 400Mbps on your FireWire connection. Basically all portable MP3 players have slow hard drives. Frankly, I'd be shocked if you could max out 30Mbps.

      Look at it this way, assuming you can fill up 4GB in 12 minutes (which to me sounds dubious) you're getting about 3 minutes per gigabyte. That's 22ish seconds per gigabit, which works out to around 44Mbps. You sure WiFi isn't fast enough for an iPod mini?

    7. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by Salvo · · Score: 1

      I wish Apple would release a Camera, or at least team up with a Dedicated Camera Manufacturer to design a Camera which is as simple to use as an iPod.

      In order to take a photo with a typical Consumer Digital Camera, you have to either be happy with a poor quality Photo, or navigate though dozens of obscure menus to change simple settings like exposure time and f-stop.

      In order to transfer your photos to your computer, you have to connect the USB Cable, but you also have to connect a separate power cable to charge the battery. In some cases you have to remove the battery from the Camera and put it in a separate charger!

      IMO, Apple could design a fantastic Camera; It would have a Dock Connector port for Charging, transfer and Printing; it would plug directly into an iPod (Photo) for storage, and would have a really simple interface for adjusting Photography Settings.

      The only thing I'm not sure about would be Battery and Storage.

      An Internal Battery would have people whinging about battery life (because they're too stupid to charge Li-Ion batteries properly) and a Hard Disk would make the camera more expensive and may interfere with the CCD. The compromise could be non-removable Flash Storage, which automatically syncs with an iPod Photo.

    8. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...simply login to the nearest WiFi network

      You know you have to pass geography to graduate from high school, don't you? Or weren't you aware that WiFi typically operates over hundreds of feet at most? It would take nearly 1.4 × 10^9 Airport Extremes to get full coverage! And that's just the U.S.A.!

      I'm sorry kid, but you are a child that has been left behind.

    9. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Look, just buy a PDA!! Bluetooth, WiFi, GSM (on the phone ones), removable & cheap flash storage, games, communication software, networking. Video/music, eBooks. Great, your iPod runs doom, that's neat and all but the rest of us are living in the days of multi-tasking operating systems.

      These will have hard-drives before long...

    10. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by CUGWMUI · · Score: 1
      There were [meaningful] MP3 player sales before the iPod? Really? Where? Who had them?

      Yes. Asia. Infact, you'd be surprised to know that Apple dominates the markets only in the US and certain European countries like the UK (well, assuming they dont mind being called European).

      Most parts of Asia, which has a very sizeable market for MP3 players havent even heard of Apple's iPod range of players. The ones that sell the most are still the various unbranded Chinese/Taiwanese and branded Korean players. Here in India, where I live, the iPods are very very rare (Disclaimer: I have an iPod and my brother has an iPod Shuffle).

      The number one reason for the same.. is price. Apple sells an iPod Shuffle 512MB for, officially Rs. 7100. Unofficially, its sold for Rs. 4500. Most other MP3 players of 512MB capacity sell between Rs. 1800 and Rs. 2500. And most of them have a screen and FM radio built in. Thats a big difference.

      The fact of the matter is, Apple does not dominate the global market for MP3 players, and there was a big market for MP3 players even before the iPod.

    11. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Say it with me: regulations, regulations, regulations.

      The problem is that there hasn't been enough regulation, not that there has been too much. If the FCC had decided on a single standard, we wouldn't have the GSM vs CDMA mess. If the market were totally deregulated, the problem of mutliple frequencies would be WORSE, not better.

      Contrary to decades of Republican propaganda, government regulation can be beneficial for both manufacturers and consumers, and the dogma of "let the marketplace decide" can waste billions of dollars. Consumers don't want to commit to paying high early adopter fees for a standard that might not be around in a year, so manufacuters don't commit to mass production. DVD standards and HDTV's are prefect examples of this. If the FCC would come out and say "this is the standard. You can add to it or do your own thing, but this is the standard you should use if you expect to make any money," it would allow manufacturers and consumers to commit to new devices. We could have seen HDTV adoption soar ten years ago instead of watching it trickle today.

    12. Re:WiFi equipped iPod only way forward... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind a bluetooth enabled iPod. Not for dumping music and images but for the headset and for control. A bluetooth enabled iPod could let you use your iPod with your car stereo. The car stereo could control the iPod and the iPod could transmit the audio to the car stereo.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  26. Implication. by trosenbl · · Score: 2, Funny
    "The companies have declined to confirm or deny the report, which would fit Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day."


    They won't say anything -> it must be true?

    I hope you're not a stock broker.
    1. Re:Implication. by databyss · · Score: 1

      or a judge...

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  27. I wounder if... by farzadb82 · · Score: 1

    This has anything to do with them looking into buying 40% of Samsung's inventory in Flash memory http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/25/ 1820250&tid=198&tid=3 ?

    1. Re:I wounder if... by jigoman · · Score: 1

      Interesting thought but I doubt it since Motorola is the manufacturer of the phone. What's also interesting is how they'll NOT bite into sales of a comparable sized iPod. Throwing 512MB or even 1gig is inexcusable given the lowered costs. But how do you sell a Shuffle when the customer can now fit more on their cellphone??

    2. Re:I wounder if... by interiot · · Score: 1
      So now Motorola is doing the design and manufacturing, but Apple is doing the procurement? This rumor is going places!

      "Never attribute to reality, what otherwise can be explained by Apple fandom."
      -Oscar Wilde's Razr
  28. Revolutionary by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I heard the new Apple product would be "revolutionary" and completely new, changing live as we know it and such... a mobile phone/iPod comination will NOT be that.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Revolutionary by justforaday · · Score: 1

      I heard the new Apple product would be "revolutionary" and completely new, changing live as we know it and such...

      Hmmm. Well, they already unveiled their two-button mouse, so it's not that either...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Revolutionary by sedyn · · Score: 1

      It's going to be an iMac Shuffle.

      All my old magazines praise the Altair for it's headless computer innovation!

      --
      Am I open minded towards open source, or closed minded towards closed source?
    3. Re:Revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard the segway was gonna change the world too

    4. Re:Revolutionary by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the iPhone will actually work as a PHONE, unlike any other phone on the market. "HI MO.., YEA I'M USE.. MY ..ELL PHONE, HOW ..AN YOU TELL"...

      Of course, if Motorola already had this miracle-grade technology, they would be using it already, so the odds of the iPhone working as a phone is 0%.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  29. Makes my ears BLEED! by Zemplar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine some idiot having ~500 minutes worth of ringtones!

    1. Re:Makes my ears BLEED! by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Imagine some idiot having ~500 minutes worth of ringtones!

      Shuffle ringtones!

      "Is that me?"
      "No, wait, that's one of my favorite songs, it must be me."

    2. Re:Makes my ears BLEED! by zephc · · Score: 1

      as opposed to the 2nd verse to some crappy Nickelback song looped over and over and over

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  30. iSync? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Will iSync work with it?

    Seriously I figure in 10-20 more years the desktops and laptops will be replaced with cellphones. Like Desktops and Laptops replaces the old mainframes.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:iSync? by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Then hopefully in 10-20 more years we will be able to travel back in time and kill those responsible for the horror.

    2. Re:iSync? by gkuz · · Score: 1
      Like Desktops and Laptops replaces the old mainframes.

      Don't tell IBM they've been replaced. How else could they explain the >$5 billion in annual revenue attributable to mainframes (while they sold off their PC business).

      It's now over 40 years for the S/360 architecture, and going strong. Think iPods will be around in 40 years? Think Apple will?

    3. Re:iSync? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Seriously I figure in 10-20 more years the desktops and laptops will be replaced with cellphones.

      I hope not. It wouldn't really surprise me if in 10-20 years that there will be cell phones that can match the speed and storage capacity of my desktop PC. But I don't think they are going to have full size keyboards and 20" screens.

    4. Re:iSync? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      But what happened to other mainframe companies such as Digitial VAX, Prime Computer, How well are other companies such as Sun Micrososystems. Besides most of the "Mainframes" systems are more closely to normal PC's Servers with Larger Raid Disks attached to them. But the real point of my Previous post wasn't that Mainframes were dead but not as critical as they use to be.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:iSync? by gkuz · · Score: 1
      But what happened to other mainframe companies such as Digitial VAX, Prime Computer, How well are other companies such as Sun Micrososystems. Besides most of the "Mainframes" systems are more closely to normal PC's Servers with Larger Raid Disks attached to them.

      Clearly you know nothing about mainframes.

      Digital, Prime and Sun are not/were not mainframe companies (well, maybe certain VAXen were close), they were minicomputer companies.

      Architecturally or OS-wise, a mainframe is nothing at all like a PC server with large RAID. MVS is not like PC OSes (yes, I know you can run Linux on the new big boxes), and there's no good analogue to CICS, VTAM, TSO...

      And saying they are not as critical as they used to be just demonstrates your lack of knowledge conclusively. Do you have a bank account? Do you ever make an airline reservation? What do you think is behind those? Waht systems handle 10,000 SSL transactions per second?

  31. Re:It's the first time for me and I can't resist.. by coolfrood · · Score: 1
  32. This is perfect by stickytar · · Score: 1

    I think it was yesterday as I was trying to figure out how to configure an employees PDA/Cellphone running Windows to download his email. And all I thought about was "Wouldn't it be great if this ran OS X?" Ha ha... Thank you Steve!

    --
    believing the big bang requires a certain amount of supernatural faith
  33. Motorola iTunes Phone by lydic · · Score: 1

    Here's a link from Daily Wireless last Tuesday about the same??? phone, complete with pictures. http://www.dailywireless.org/modules.php?name=News &file=article&sid=4598/

    This of course, may or may not be what Apple will unveil, but the information did come from Motorola via the FCC.

  34. The Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Its already starting to lag up.

    SAN FRANCISCO -- Apple Computer and Motorola plan next week to unveil a long-awaited mobile phone and music player that will incorporate Apple's iTunes software, a telecommunications industry analyst who has been briefed on the announcement said Monday.

    The development marks a melding of two of the digital era's most popular devices, the cell phone and the iPod, which has become largely synonymous with the concept of downloading songs from the Internet or transferring them from compact discs.

    Roger Entner, a telecommunications analyst with Ovum, a market research firm, said he had been told by an industry executive that the new phone, made by Motorola, would be marketed by Cingular Wireless. Entner said it would include iTunes software, which helps power the iPod.

    The software will allow people to transfer songs from a personal computer to the mobile phone, then listen to the songs, presumably through headphones. "It will allow people to lick CmdrTaco's butthole," he said of the device.

    Apple, Motorola and Cingular all declined to confirm or deny the report. But Apple did announce on Monday that it would hold a major press event Sept. 7 in San Francisco that it indicated was music-related. Apple is routinely tight-lipped about pending product announcements, preferring to make a splash on the day of the event.

    The plans outlined for an Apple phone are consistent with recent announcements by Motorola, which said in July 2004 that it planned to develop a device that would include the iTunes software.

    Last month, Motorola said that development of the iTunes phone was on track to be unveiled by the end of September.

    Jennifer Weyrauch, a spokeswoman for Motorola, declined on Monday to comment on Apple's announcement plans for next week. Weyrauch did say, generally speaking, that when Motorola unveiled a phone equipped with iTunes software, it would be a part of a line of music-oriented phones that the company calls Rokr.

    1. Re:The Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who marked this informative? Did anyone notice this:

      "It will allow people to lick CmdrTaco's butthole,"

  35. Crazy Frog ringtones by October_30th · · Score: 1

    Or, even worse, ~500 minutes worth of Crazy Frog ringtones...

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  36. Red herring, anyone? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    Seems to me this is a red herring, designed to distract people from a much larger announcement, like say a video iPod or somesuch. iTunes on a phone? Whoopdee-fracking-doo.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  37. Re:It's the first time for me and I can't resist.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question is: "Does it play Ogg Vorbis?"

  38. The Apple Product Cycle by zaguar · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
  39. I credit slashdotters by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    I credit slashdotters for predicting this way back when the iPOD was still the new kid on the block. I remember one slashdotter who specifically said this was expected. This [news] proves him right.

    1. Re:I credit slashdotters by dthree · · Score: 1

      Are these the same idiots that predicted apple's change to Intel processors...IN 1998?

      d3 `-{>

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
  40. you could always.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ..call up your home computer and stream your songs from there, if you had unlimited data or some good plan like that.

    1. Re:you could always.... by Iriel · · Score: 1

      I'm not too aware of any plans in the states that offer unlimited data for a reasonable price (if at all, actually). If you know of one, please let me know.

      Otherwise, the point I was making in the quoted text is that the audience that they may be looking for probably wants an instant solution rather than go through the trouble of settting up something exponentially more elaborate. Besides, they would have to pay for a constant connection at home plus unlimted data, which would probably cost more than a 60GB iPod for all we know! ;)

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    2. Re:you could always.... by pyite · · Score: 2, Informative

      T-Mobile has unlimited data for $20/month. Good luck getting a signal, though.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    3. Re:you could always.... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      T-Mobile does, for $20/month plus a regular plan, but the service is capped at 56kbps. Hopefully they'll upgrade to UMTS soon which should solve that particular problem.

      To the idiot who said "Good luck getting a signal", the fact you can't in your particular location is of no concern to the rest of us. Different mobile operators have different strengths in different locations. T-Mobile over here (South East Florida) has excellent coverage, comparable to the "big 2".

      Unless you happen to know exactly where someone lives, it's generally inadvisable to claim they'll have difficulty getting a signal, whether it's T-Mobile, Cingular, Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, MetroPCS, or anyone else.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:you could always.... by rekoil · · Score: 4, Informative

      64kbps is the technical limit of vanilla GPRS. However, T-Mobile is pretty far along with their EDGE rollout in most metro areas - here in Atlanta I have to go outside the perimeter before I lose EDGE coverage. Real-world transfer rates are in the 80-100kbps range almost everywhere I've checked where I have more than one bar. Check this forum for user's reports.

      AFAIK T-Mobile is waiting for the deployment to be completed before they begin marketing the service, but there's not going to be any additional charges for it beyond what they charge for GPRS today. They have just begun to sell the v330, which has EDGE support (I use an unlocked v551).

      As far as T-Mobile's coverage, I will note that the higher-frequency band (they're on 1800 or 1900MHz in the US, Cingular uses 850) does cause the signal to drop out sooner inside buildings than Cingular's - for some reason it happens a lot in supermarkets - due to faster attenuation of higher-frequency signals. But other than that, I don't have problems in metro areas. Rural/suburban areas are a different story, I've heard...

    5. Re:you could always.... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I didn't know they were rolling out EDGE already, that's cool.

      The frequency makes a little bit of a difference but not much. My reception in both my old apartment and new house is fine and comparable to Cingular's, AT&T's (before they merged), etc. Actually it's fractionally better (and was a lot better in the apartment) but that's the luck of the draw more than anything else.

      I'm in a relatively rural area, FWIW.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:you could always.... by griboyedov · · Score: 1

      Or you could use DittyBot + Skype and do it one song at a time.

    7. Re:you could always.... by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Not to mention battery life...

    8. Re:you could always.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not know, but which frequencies and which providers even operate their own towers varies a lot by region in the US. When I left Los Angeles, Cingular and ATT operated towers in the 1900 band and T-Mobile roamed on Cingular. The T-Mobile phones are tweaked to suppress roaming indication and network ID to avoid confusing ignorant users. It is interesting to put the provider SIMs in unlocked worldphones and see what is really going on...

  41. Other Announcements by gcondon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple will also be announcing a flying car, the cure for cancer and Duke Nukem Forever.

    Unfortunately, there is no evidence of this but that fits with "Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day."

    1. Re:Other Announcements by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      I for one would buy an Apple branded flying car. But it'd better be available in any color I want as long as its white with silver highlights.

      Oh and it'd better have DRM that just works to prevent you from using anyone's map or parking space that didn't come from the Apple Flying Car Store (unless you happen to crack it with jVolantor first.)

      And what about that cure for cancer? It'll only be a niche product since 90% + of the people don't have cancer anyway!

      And DNF........keep on dreaming. The Second Coming will happen first.

  42. Not an iPod Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    All indications are that this is just a normal phone with a mobile version of iTunes. Installing iTunes on a Dell doesn't make it an iPod computer. Motorola industrial design, motorola software, motorola UI, Apple's iTunes.

  43. Re:It's the first time for me and I can't resist.. by bsgk · · Score: 1

    According to Engadget, it will.

  44. Re:It's the first time for me and I can't resist.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your first time doing what? Premature ejaculation?

  45. Why not just proclaim /. as a mirror of the NYT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean really, I usually read it there first ...

  46. iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great... now I can have my MP3 player and my phone stolen in one shot.
    Seriously, I love combining technology - but the battery life better be more on par with the iPod rather than the typical Motorola phones or this will just suck.
    Perhaps Apple/Motorola (ironic these 2 are working together again) will get it right with this phone.
    BUT - Cingular will fsck it up with their horrible service.
    Just my 2 cents...

  47. I thought text enty was bad on PSP ... how Clickw? by oxnyx · · Score: 1

    I know lots of people love the clickwheel. It is great for a menu only system. However I hate to think what trying to get a number into the system would be like. click .. click ... clickk ..dang pass 8 again... clickkk ... (Yes I have set my clock it wasn't too bad but a number pad makes sense to dial with. ;) Otherwise meh..there are lots of MP3 cells out and TBH I'd say that iPod harddrive makes it a touch heavy for carry. *shrugs*

    --
    Life is like untied shoe laces; it always tripping you up and getting in your way.
  48. Consider... by Captain+Perspicuous · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Consider...
    • the invitation said "1000 songs, here we go again", so it will probably have 4GB of memory
    • Adding a 4GB harddisk will make the phone look fat (Nokia N91: 160 grams)
    • Apple is rumored to buy up large quantities of RAM
    ...I think it's clear what we will see: a mobile phone with 4GB of integrated memory... drool! :-)
    1. Re:Consider... by 101percent · · Score: 1

      you make a good point but apple has never been known to hype up simply upgraded models of their hardware.

    2. Re:Consider... by seramar · · Score: 1

      Great... as soon as I leave it in my pants pocket overnight and forget to charge it up I'll have to copy 3.8 gigs of music back to the device in the morning :(

      --
      australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
    3. Re:Consider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not DRAM, it's flash. As in...the same type of memory in thumb drives. No need to worry about the battery failing and your data being lost.

    4. Re:Consider... by ReagansUndeadBrain · · Score: 1

      I hope you are right that they will be using solid state memory as opposed to a rotating disk, but not because of the physical size. Microdrives are tiny these days - they fit nicely in the palm of your hand.

      The reason I hope you are right is that from time to time I drop my mobile, but it keeps on working. Things with moving mechanical parts are generally less reliable. I wonder how many times I could drop a mobile with a disk before the head crashed on the platter and caused irreversible damage.

      It would be interesting to see Apple's RMA data for iPods, although I bet people are less likely to drop their precious mp3 players than their mobiles (at least I am).

    5. Re:Consider... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      The reason I hope you are right is that from time to time I drop my mobile, but it keeps on working.

      Heh. I never, ever seem to drop my keys when taking them out of my pocket, but manage to drop my phone seemingly every other day. Good thing Samsung makes resonably sturdy phones.

  49. IPhone VoIP by Pixelmixer · · Score: 1

    I dont believe the iphone is going to go this direction just yet, but it seems like a very interesting idea. VoIP through a wifi connected cell phone... of course it would have to still have the basic usage of a normal cell until the entire world is blanketed in wifi hotspots.

    --
    "What happend to just paying for a product without being constantly nibbled to death by Credit Card Ducks?"
    1. Re:IPhone VoIP by Wonderkid · · Score: 1

      As per my earlier posting (above), a WiFi equipped iPod would make the most sense Reasons given in earlier post.

      --

      O'WONDERWe're working on it.

    2. Re:IPhone VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power consumption for WiFi and WiMAX make them untennable for the time being wrt mobile telecommunications.

  50. No Bars by theraccoon · · Score: 1

    This is so 1337. I heard you can download music and listen to your favorite MP3s with the iPod Phone, but you have to go stand in the street with your arm bent backwards because you STILL can't get any signal from inside your house.

  51. Apple innovates the cellphone? by rocjoe71 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will their new cellphone only have one button, just like their mice? Just kidding...

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    1. Re:Apple innovates the cellphone? by sean23007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's going to have no buttons, like the mighty mouse. You just squeeze it in a certain way to start a song, and a different certain way to call people. It's going to be so easy, nobody will be able to figure it out.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    2. Re:Apple innovates the cellphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia already made the one-button phone. No, really.

      http://reviews.cnet.com/Nokia_7280/4535-6454_7-312 56627.html?tag=top

    3. Re:Apple innovates the cellphone? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      I hope it only has one button like the Ipod. No keypad is better than a too tiny keypad.

      --

      mbbac

  52. cell phones are out, WiFi phones are in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised. Afterall cell phones are on the way out and WiFi phones have become the new hot thing. I would have expected Apple to come out with a WiFi phone instead but, hey, that might well be their next move.

  53. Nextel by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    I've said it once, and I'll say it again. Everyone says, "Your phone has a black and white screen, and doesn't have a camera". But when they need to make a call and they have their phone with them, and I'm driving, they always ask to use mine because it's the only one that ever works 100%. I don't work for Nextel, but if I did, I would brag about them in my sig.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Nextel by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's just a quirk of my coverage area, but I routinely got better coverage with phones from both Verizon and Cingular (I'm with Cingular now) than I did with my Nextel.

  54. Typical rumour reporting by GauteL · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "The companies have declined to confirm or deny the report, which would fit Apple's past pattern of being secretive to maximise the splash on announcement day."

    It also fits with there being nothing in the rumour. I'm not saying it is is definitely false, but people should remember that there have always been massive amounts of rumours concerning new Apple products, and most of these end up being false.

    The only way of remaining secretive is to refuse to comment on any rumours, whether they are true or not.

  55. Lets use the iPod as an example of why this is bad by el_womble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The iPod works because it is a music player. It is not a music recorder. It is not a fancy music organiser. It is a music player. If you want to do anything 'clever' you plug it into a Mac and control it through a GUI that elegantly handles the complexity outside of the beautifully simple player. The iPod is also a portable harddisk. If you want to use it as such, you just plug it into a Mac, and it works as a slow, but effective harddisk.

    The Apple phone should be ALOT like this.

    It should be a phone. It shouldn't be a web browswer, PSP, or run my house. It should also be a data point. I should be able to do nothing more than pair my mac with my iPhone and it should just work from that point on as a data point (in the absense of anything faster / cheaper).

    I'm in two minds weather you should be able to input any real data at all. I have never really used the PIM functions of my phone other than to read them. If I want to change/add/delete an entry I usually fire up the closest Mac, do it on that, then resync. The only thing I can really see me doing is adding a new phone number, and dialing and, at a push, SMS (but thats soooo 90s technology).

    In that respect I could see the iPhone being almost a clone of the iPod Mini, just with a menu system aimed more at PIM data, and a jog wheel that doubles as an old style phone dialler - (no touch buttons would really make it stand out).

    Apple have played and won in the music player market, because they understand that people that own MP3 players own computers too. Now that line isn't as clean in the phone market, but its not that far off - and for those of use that do own both, a phone that is designed around this paradigm is what is really missing from the market (not a phone that can access my iTMS account).

    Of course this phone won't be anything like that, so it will fail. It will be another Motorola monstrosity that does everything in its power in make Cingular more money at the expense of usability, battery life and my patience. As such it will be another fish in the sea, albeit a fish with Apple branding.

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  56. Re:Why not just proclaim /. as a mirror of the NYT by tbone1 · · Score: 0
    Because, unlike the New York Times, /. has not paid their Professional Journalism Plagiarism Tax.

    Sincerely,
    Jayson Blair

    (Oh, right, he stole someone's story, and I'm the bad guy here ...)

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  57. Work on the basics by danhan79 · · Score: 1

    I've had two Motorolas (i730 and the V) and they simply do not perform well. Many of my friends have the RAZR as well I hear the same thing that seems to beleaguer most Motorolas: dropped calls and weak battery life. Motorola need focus on making a good phone first then work on all the bells and whistles.

  58. Only Fools... by eno2001 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...will buy into this kind of gadgetry. Simply put, "we're not there yet" so why bother forking out cash for an inferior device? All of the crappy devices that are coming out today and constantly changing shape, form factor and interoperability are good for businesses and bad for you. You spend all this money on a device that's only going to last you two or three years at best. Somewhere within those two or three years something better is going to come out and you'll jump on that bandwagon forking out even more cash. meanwhile the investment in this device is lost. Whatever happened to the notion of building a device that was made to last? (ie: GOOD FOR THE CUSTOMER)

    Today cell phones are coming with cameras and various memory card slots to support things like taking pictures, making videos, playing music and the like. Some cell phones are also offering TV. It's the whole "convergence" thing being re-released early and often, as it were. Meanwhile the consumers are being duped into spending more and more money on things they don't need but are told that they do. Do you NEED a video recorder in your phone? Really? Do you actually **NEED** that? The .001% of the population that actually needs a way to record video for a legitimate reason (paying job or possibly some sort of visual communication need) is going to do it another way that's better than a shitty camera phone.

    Do you really NEED a music player combined with your cell phone? You've been getting along without one all this time. Why the sudden change? I'll tell you why. Because your mind is owned by the business who want (and don't deserve) access to your money! Personally, I wouldn't buy any of this crap unless it does exactly what I need. A music player on it's own makes sense. A music player combined with the markedly useless features of a phone is an ill-implemented luxury. I think I'd be far more excited if a Sony PSP was combined with cell phone functionality. The whole point being that the best portable device that *SHOULD* be the lust object of all people, is the one that can do it all, and do it all well. Not some shitty hacked together mixture of a mediocre technology (iPod) and subpar technology (cell phone).

    For a while, I was tempted by the Compaq iPaqs until I realized they aren't made for people like me. They're made for suits. Who cares about schedules, meetings, writing documents in Word and Excel? Not a tech manager, that's for sure. The ideal PDA for me is one that will respond to voice commands, have a wearable display, CLI interface, Unix based, support for alternative text input and wireless. But guess what? There's nothing like that on the market because the companies that make PDAs don't sell to people like me. They sell to mindless sheeple who want gadgets as fetishistic status symbols. They know that those people will keep buying and buying and buying. It's sickening.

    Our culture has hopelessly damaged itself through capitalism. These days the only reson to exist is to buy or sell. If you don't want to participate then you have to live on the fringes of society and be labelled as an eccentric. No one does anything to further culture or society anymore. There was a time when people were concerned with making sure that everyone (especially the underpriveleged) was accorded some access to things that will enrich their lives, increase their knowledge and allow them to lift themselves up. Now, everyone is concerned with how much money they make and how their investments are doing. All the while not caring that their investments may be hurting other people. (Walmart is a glaring example)

    So thanks Apple. Thanks Motorola. By creating this stupid new and destined to be obsolete in less than five years product, you've convinced more fools to part with their money. That money could have been used to help our society and instead it's going to go to some office monkey walking down the street to work showing off his snazzy new cell phone/iPod. Which he will promptly lose interest in when the next Motorola cell phone comes out that has a music player, video player, brain interface, whatever... It is a truly sad age we live in.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Only Fools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spend all this money on a device

      I work with computers. Hence, I make a lot of money. These gadgets do not cost me "all this money" -- it's pocket change compared to vacations, food, rent, etc.

      that's only going to last you two or three years at best.

      That's a lot. I consider these devices to have a useful lifetime of, say, two years. The enjoyment I derive from my consumer electronic gadgets generally pays itself back in well less than two years. Sometimes less than a year if I simply have a few really great experiences with a device.

      meanwhile the investment in this device is lost.

      Not in my books. These "investments" (strange use of the word, but fine), generally return my money in enjoyment, fun, learning, style, and other ways that I could monetize if required. You'll have to judge for youself, of course, but please stop speaking for all of us!

      Whatever happened to the notion of building a device that was made to last?

      So buy a hammer.

      It is a truly sad age we live in.

      Oh, lordy. We're talking about ridiculously high-end luxury items! You think our age is "sad" because the toys of the elite few (i.e. US!) don't last as long as they could. Look at the big picture and our "age" is truly as happy or sad as we make it.

      If there is sadness in our age, it has nothing to do with the durability or design of luxury consumer items!

    2. Re:Only Fools... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      You spend all this money on a device that's only going to last you two or three years at best.

      So what? Many people use their iPods and cellphones every day. So amortized over a two or three year life, that probably works out to about a penny a day.

      Do you really NEED a music player combined with your cell phone? You've been getting along without one all this time. Why the sudden change? I'll tell you why. Because your mind is owned by the business who want (and don't deserve) access to your money!

      Not particularly. In fact, I don't NEED a cell phone or music player at all. But they certainly make life more pleasant, just as it would be more pleasant and simpler to have only one device to carry around instead of two. And if that is worth a penny a day to me, why is it so terrible for businesses to offer me that option?

    3. Re:Only Fools... by acsinc · · Score: 1

      I guess I really don't need anything other than a sharp rock and a couple of sticks to survive. In fact I am certain that many of my ancestors did just fine with only that. But one day one of my ancestors learned about bronze. And a few hundreds years later they learned about Iron. Those guys that bought in to bronze sure were stupid, they should have waited and invested in iron. Instead all of their smelting abitlity was tied up in an inferior alloy.

    4. Re:Only Fools... by Konowl · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should wait until the product is actually UNVEILED and you've used one before you ramble on about how much it sucks, IF they are actually going this route. Me personally, my cell phone goes everywhere with me, I charge it in the car. To have a built in MP3 player (a GOOD one, akin to the quality of the Ipod) would be great.

      I seem to recall slashdot's response to the original Ipod announcement from people like you.

    5. Re:Only Fools... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      The nerve of that eno2001 guy to think that he knows all. Well, I've met people like hime on Slashdot and they tend to be pretty unstable individual. usually calling for impeachment of president Bush and stuff like that. He's probably a terrorist too. ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    6. Re:Only Fools... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do you really NEED a music player combined with your cell phone?
      Well, no, I don't NEED this, but then I don't need a music player at all. The fact is though that I don't like carrying around a bunch of gadgets everywhere. Right now, I leave the iPod at work most of the time because I only have so much pocket space, and dragging it home together with my cellphone and wallet is a PITA. Don't even ask about my digital camera, which stays at home most of the time gathering dust. If I were a woman, something like a handbag would make such gadget carrying more practical, but I'm not and the more I carry, the less comfortable I am and the more likely I am to leave things behind.

      The deal is systems like this make music players more practical. If you can combine something with the same functionality as my iPod, my cellphone, and a digital camera, into one pocketable device, I'm there. Even better, include the rest of the PDA too (except without those stupid, touch screen orientated UIs and portrait orientations, which are impractical - I want a keyboard, please, if I'm expected to enter text. Ideally, the platform should be based upon Free Software, preferably under a GPL compatable license, if not the GPL.) I'm actually not asking for a lot:

      1. A GSM/GPRS/UMTS phone, preferably one that takes two SIMs, allowing it to listen on two networks simultaneously. Quadband and UMA support would be perfect
      2. A 3 megapixel Kodak-quality camera
      3. The ability to act as an 802.11g peer or hub, with the machine showing up as a basic server on the network that you can just copy files to and from, plus network routing for when the phone's in GPRS/etc mode.
      4. a 10G (or better) mini-HD, so I can store all my music rather than have to decide what music I'm going to listen to in advance
      5. Good MP3 and Ogg support
      6. Standardized 2.5mm handsfree and 3.5mm stereo headset jacks
      7. Openable to reveal a landscape touchscreen plus a minikeyboard
      Some years ago, this'd have been difficult. Today, all of these exist in different boxes. How hard can it be to combine them all into one multifunction unit, with the cost benefits of one CPU running the show?
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Only Fools... by jaysones · · Score: 1

      What a bunch of drivel. I got an cellphone/mp3 player/2 mpxl camera combo because I ride the subway to work and like to take pictures of stuff I see every day. I can carry this tiny phone, which works very well, instead of a separate phone, camera and MP3 player. It has nothing to do with fetishistic status symbolism, it has everything to do with convenience. My mind is not owned by the cellphone company, I just want to conveniently listen to music, make calls, and take photos!

      By your argument, this makes sense: Do you really NEED to wear clothes every day? People got by a long time without them. Your mind is owned by the fashion industry and unless you go naked in public, you are a slave to the Gap.

      The more I read your post, the more I'm convinced it's an outright troll.

    8. Re:Only Fools... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Sounds like you want a lot, and you're precisely the kind of person who's ruining mobile phones with your demands for more and more. What happened to "Do one thing, do it well?"

      It's hard these days to get any kind of phone that doesn't support a whole bunch of stuff I don't want or need. I want something simple, that I can use to call people on. A black and white, or LED, display, no stupid ports or modes or anything. Just dial the number and it calls it. How hard can it be? And why the move from analog? At least I could hear people on my old analog phone.

      If I want to listen to music on the go, with "custom playlists" and other crap like that, I'll use my cassette recorder. That's what it was designed to do, and it does it without needing everything stored on a computer or stupid UIs or anything. Swapping playlists is a matter of swapping tapes. Choosing playlists to take with me is a matter of loading myself up with a bag of tapes. The UI couldn't be easier. No DRM or other evils like that.

      As for needing a PDA, what's wrong with a notepad and calculator? I see you also want to be able to browse the web, but people have been carrying around portable units for keeping themselves updated on the latest happenings for a long time - they're called "Radios" and "Newspapers".

      All of these are reliable technologies that do what they're supposed to do. Instead you want some overcomplicated piece of junk that you probably have to spend hundreds of dollars on and will throw away in due course. Why waste the money? And if portability is the issue, why not carry a bag? It doesn't have to be a handbag, despite your sexist assertion that it does.

      Really, this sounds like a lot of nerdy using-technology-for-its-own sake. There are perfectly acceptable alternatives that exist today that you can use today. Use them. Stop expecting Nokia and Motorola and IBM to bail you out all the time.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:Only Fools... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      As for needing a PDA, what's wrong with a notepad and calculator? I see you also want to be able to browse the web, but people have been carrying around portable units for keeping themselves updated on the latest happenings for a long time - they're called "Radios" and "Newspapers".
      Clue to parent: It's 2005! We don't have to lug around huge sacks of gadgets just to ensure we can have music and stuff right now. There's absolutely nothing wrong with wanting a small box that does a whole range of things I find useful and need regularly.

      This is the computer age. Computers are multifunction devices that can be programmed to do almost anything. What we lack is a willingness to include enough extras to make them that flexible. It doesn't add much to the cost of a PDA to add cellphone and camera functionality, nor to add a cheap keyboard and an HD. If we can incorporate all of this into one device, then why shouldn't we?

      And if portability is the issue, why not carry a bag? It doesn't have to be a handbag, despite your sexist assertion that it does.
      Sexist assertion? Back that up, please! All I said was that men can't generally get away with carrying handbags. That's the society we live in.
      Really, this sounds like a lot of nerdy using-technology-for-its-own sake. There are perfectly acceptable alternatives that exist today that you can use today. Use them. Stop expecting Nokia and Motorola and IBM to bail you out all the time
      Oh sure, a Slashdotter criticising another for being a nerd. Oh har har.

      I'm not expecting anyone to bail me out, I'm merely describing the type of device I'd want. What's wrong with that?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Only Fools... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Hear here! I agree.

      The major issue with mobile phones having a lot of features at the moment isn't the fact they have features, it's that they're the wrong features and the phones are usually badly designed.

      If I could get a phone like the one you described (especially with the standardized 2.5mm jack - take note Nokia with your overpriced and uncomfortable headsets), I'd buy it in an instant. Also useful would be USB so you could plug in a keyboard and mouse if you happen to have one handy - not important, but definitely useful.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:Only Fools... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Sounds like what you want is one of these. From the website:
      * Networks: GSM, UMTS (W-CDMA) 850/900/1800/1900 (GSM/UMTS), 2.4GHz (UMTS)
      * UMA on 802.11 and Bluetooth
      * 3 Megapixel Kodak-quality camera
      * Works as a peer or a hub on 802.11, share your GPRS and 3G connection with your friends
      * 11G hard disk
      * Supports MP3, Ogg Vorbis, and WAV music
      * Standardized headset jacks, none of this Nokia-proprietary nonsense we usually do
      * Opens up to show full colour 1024x600 touchscreen and miniture keyboard

      Price: $0 with service, $49 unlocked
      Quite honestly, I wouldn't touch that kind of thing with a bargepole, I prefer flip phones.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    12. Re:Only Fools... by eno2001 · · Score: 0

      Well. You obviously know nothing about computing devices. One CPU is going to be way loaded down all that functionality you're asking for. I can't see that going over well. Frankly, I'm all for the idea of bluetooth clustering with portable devices. Just imagine a Beowulf on your belt. Now that's REAL power. You pick up your phone and you can control your music player. If you're on a long walk you can divert power from the PDA grid to the music player's main cells thereby increasing the amount of time you can listen to Dark Side of the Moon repeatedly. Putting all your eggs in one basket is a bad idea. Get with the times buddy! Clustered parallel processing is the way of the future! Even on the belt top!

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    13. Re:Only Fools... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Oh ye of little intellect... Clusters on belts!? Where in the hell is your mind man? I can relate to the idea of clusters in the server room. Clusters of office PCs that are unused at night make a little sense too. But clusters of portable devices that you carry with you? Do you realize what you're even saying?!! First off, the idea of using bluetooth as the transport between different nodes of a cluster is so ludicrous it doesn't even warrant comment. If you proposed that at any R&D facility, they'd laugh you right out the door in a heartbeat. But, supposing that bluetooth was a viable interconnect between nodes, you're forgetting about a very important aspect of clustered computing. For all of the hype about clustering, one thing most people aren't even aware of is the need for security. Most cluster nodes are in closed and secure environments. Now, unless you plan to start wearing a lead and aluminum foil sheild around your midriff, I don't see how you'll keep such a cluster secure. bluetooth by it's very nature is promiscuous. Do you realize that with clustered beltware combined with address books, you could have a mega virus/worm sweeping the entire wireless world in seconds? And all from the belly of some 300 lb. IT monkey with too much time on his hands? It's people like you who keep me awake at night.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    14. Re:Only Fools... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Just for future reference, USB is outmoded. The new interconnect is PCI-X. Learn it. Know it. Love it.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    15. Re:Only Fools... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I think you're so concerned about security, you're not looking at the full potential of this idea, and you're ignoring some quite remarkable technologies that could make this safe, coming from well known experts in secure computer technologies like Sun and Microsoft.

      Look, by itself, a single cellphone CPU isn't capable of much. Most are pretty much at their limits when they simultaneously encode a 64kbps audio PCM stream as 14kbps GSM, decode a similar stream, encrypt and decrypt said streams, update a 3d image on a 2" LCD, while playing an MP3 out of an addition 3.5mm jack, compressing a 24fps VGA video stream from the built-in camera and storing it on the disk, and use what's left over to SETI@Home. That's not a lot by modern standards.

      But most of those CPUs are idle most of the time. By utilizing clustering, you can have neighbouring CPUs provide additional power, so that, for example, someone can play a multiplayer session of Unreal Tournament 2007 on their phone, with the built-in projector showing the entire thing at 200fps 2048x1536 on a nearby wall. The secret is that the master CPU in the phone being used will utilize the processing power of its neighbouring phones, via Bluetooth.

      Now, you raise security as a potential issue, but in practice it isn't. You see, Microsoft's Paladium technology means that only trusted mobile phones would be allowed to help, and those trusted mobile phones really would be trusted. Simple .NET procedures, signed and encrypted, would be transmitted to the neighbouring phones, which in turn would help with the Unreal Tournament session. Microsoft's technologies will keep the phones 100% secure, guaranteeing there would never be any reason to fear worms or anything else on apparently insecure networks like Bluetooth.

      Who can be against that?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    16. Re:Only Fools... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      This isn't really related to your post, but I noticed that you too use a cassette player, like I do. I've been using Certron C-60 tapes since 1978 and just rerecording over them from the radio. But the quality seems to be dropping. I clean the tape heads every 12 hours like I'm supposed to. So I'm at a bit of a loss as to what might be causing the drops in the high frequency range. Would you suggest degaussing the head? My uncle said that worked for him with reel-to-reel, but I have my doubts considering how much newer a technology cassettes are when compared with reel-to-reel decks. Also, I don't trust the new Chromium tapes. Have you tried them yet?

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    17. Re:Only Fools... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but this couldn't be worse. What you're looking at is either a security nightmare, or an absolute guarantee that extremists against openness like Micro$oft will take technologies like "Bluetooth" and implement "security measures" that will, essentially, lock ordinary programmers and developers out of their own hardware, forcing us to use whatever version of Winblows they want to force us to use.

      This kind of distributed computing is ultimately a way of implementing DRM by the back door. By guaranteeing that a network has to implement a trust system to work effectively, you're allowing a situation to arise where data cannot flow freely, allowing the MPAA to force us to pay every time we listen to their so-called "music", eg Brittney Spears etc, and the DMCA to prevent us from quite legally distributing their movies to millions of fans.

      Worse still, once can envisage a situation where cellphones with this kind of "trust" technology will need EULAs to be agreed to to use. Imagine if every time you call someone, you have to click on "I agree" to yet another long list of terms and conditions, culiminating in, at worst, an agreement that you cannot talk ill of Cingular or Verizon?

      And that's not to mention that all this DRM and stuff will probably take more processing power to implement than we'd gain.

      Did you think about that? Or are you just another M$ Shill, like Laura DilDio and Moron O'Hara? It's rediculous. And all to implement features I could care less about. We have everything to loose with these overpowered cellphones.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:Only Fools... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      A technology guru you might be, but a security expert you are not!! The first rule of security is full disclosure. If you want to be secure hide everything in plain sight. As soon as you start throwing up barriers like encryption and .Net, you make things interesting to the evil hacker types. But, you are apparently someone who has dranken of the Kool-Aid of Microsoft. The last thing we need here is some Bill Gate's loving capitalist pig. If this world is going to get any better, we need to open all doors and windows and take away all barriers to entry at every level. I should be able to walk into your house and use your toilet without having to even know you live there. That is the ideal. In such a world, you wouldn't own the Beowulf cluster. The cluster would own you!! When you ask how anyone could be against what you propose, my only answer is, "Open your eyes".

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  59. Must use Cingular by inajamaica · · Score: 0

    ...But you have to use Cingular. Doesn't this turn anybody off? The idea of being locked into any service provider when choosing a device turns me off every time, but it seems that the masses are indifferent. They just see swiss army knife of digital tools and fall in love?

    1. Re:Must use Cingular by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      You're highly unlikely to be locked into Cingular. While initial sales will be to Cingular, (a) Cingular do, occasionally, unlock their phones for use with other carriers, and (b) the likelyhood is that the phones will be sold to other carriers too, and it will be easy to get unlocked versions.

      It's a GSM phone, as long as it's not locked, switching to a different carrier will be a matter of putting in your SIM.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  60. My Other Personali[tt]y by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Awww... someone didn't get the iPaq or iPod he wanted, did he? Take your meds dude and chill for a while. ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  61. either way..... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ..I don't think I'd sweat now. What with the advances in flash based memeory and tiny microdrives, I think they'll solve the storage problem to give users adequate space for more than 100 songs.

    Everyone and their cuzzin Leroy has been wondering when Apple would finally resurrect a PDA, this is the closest yet (if true that is). And smartphones are getting there fast.

    1. Re:either way..... by Iriel · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm just waiting for anybody to resurrect the PDA. I could use a good one, but I'd rather not pay a number of dollars equal to the number of years the features have been available ;)</gripe></bitch></moan>

      As is, the only thing that's actually looking good to me is Blackberry.

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
  62. we shall see... by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As I said on Macslash,

    From TFA: Apple Computer is preparing a major announcement next week, dropping hints of something as critical to the company's future as the release of the original iPod in 2001.

    Which is hysterical. Apple hyped the hell out of that announcement, and afterwards, everyone was just saying "An MP3 player? That's it? There's tons already" at best and "No wireless, smaller than a Nomad. Lame" [slashdot.org] at worst. No one realized that one key feature--a great UI--would set it apart and allow Apple to dominate the industry. Who would have thought at the time that it would re-define Apple as much as the iMac did 3 years earlier?

    So, this new announcement is only half of the story. The other half is the effect it will have on (((whatever))) over the next few years.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:we shall see... by stud9920 · · Score: 0
      No one realized that one key feature--a great UI--would set it apart and allow Apple to dominate the industry
      It's not such a great UI.

      No real power button is a poor idea if there is a slight chance that the OS might hang, which is the case.

      The fonts are too big and don't allow to see most of the song's title

      There's no way to fast seek a song in a 4000+ list, you will have to accelerate the scrolling and will overshoot.

      If I select an "Artist" for which no songs are marked as being in an "Album", I should not have to select "All"
    2. Re:we shall see... by sootman · · Score: 1

      >It's not such a great UI.

      Like democracy, it's not perfect, but it's the best we've seen so far.

      >No real power button is a poor idea if there is a slight chance that the OS might hang, which is the case.

      Agreed, but mine has hung only a couple times in 2 years. My last three car stereos have also had "press and hold a button to turn off" 'functionality' and I hate it there, too. OTOH, I love that it comes on when I unlock it.

      >The fonts are too big and don't allow to see most of the song's title

      Depends. Since I no longer name my songs artist_name_-_album_name_-_song_name it's not a problem for me.

      >There's no way to fast seek a song in a 4000+ list, you will have to accelerate the scrolling and will overshoot.

      I had trouble getting used to non-constant-speed mice at first. You might overshoot, but practice makes you better (or did me, at least), and again, it's better than others. Even with overshooting, I can get from Abba to Queen faster than with any other player. Which would you rather do, assuming "get to it in 5 seconds on the first try" isn't a choice: 15 seconds of "scroll, overshoot, back, oops too far, forward, here we are" or two minutes of "scroll 5 names, scroll 5 names, scroll 5 names..." To be honest, I can usually nail a song pretty quickly. Also, I don't often page through my list of songs. I usually hit an artist/album or playlist.

      >If I select an "Artist" for which no songs are marked as being in an "Album", I should not have to select "All"

      Agreed, but that really is a minor quibble. I didn't say 'perfect,' I said 'great.' I'm sure there are little things not to like about Ferraris, too, that Ford gets right. Of course it's not perfect for everyone. It also lacks gapless playback, an FM tuner, and a million other things. But why do they have 80%+ of the market, and why did I buy one? Partly because of the trendiness, but mostly because it really is easier to use than others, and Just Works (tm).

      And when I said UI, I didn't mean the software as much as their one great innovation--the scroll-forever wheel. Paging through lists on any other player is pretty painful. Being able to go and go and go with one continuous motion is great. You don't have to go full-speed all the time. Slow down a bit and it becomes much easier.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  63. Pictures and specs by visionsofmcskill · · Score: 3, Informative
    Engadget has pics and specs (128mb) from last month, this is a pre-production model they somehow got a hold of, im guessing the real deal will be nicer looking, and probably have a good deal more ram.

    Maybe apple insisted on a click wheel with numbers in it (like touch button rotary... :) )

    http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000887049175/ mod up and share, cheers

    --
    --Idiots, Every single one of YOU, A flaming mass of conglomerated morons, hey wait a second, isnt that how RAID works?
    1. Re:Pictures and specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And clips from something claiming to be the E790 user manual showing Ipod operation:

      http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1242

    2. Re:Pictures and specs by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

      When you see a phone in that state of mechanical completion (including PCB and components), it's basically a given that the final product will look and be the same. What you're looking at in the engadget article is likely the product of a 1-2 year old project. Changing mechanics at this point would be virtually impossible without effectively scrapping the project or tacking on another period of years. Either that or it's a red herring and totally fake, which I don't think anyone has ever done or even tried to do.

      If that phone is the rumored phone in question, then that's what it will look like. There have already been numerous delays and rumored announcements so I wouldn't hold my breath. I suspect the reason is that Samsung and Nokia have caught Motorola by surprise and effectively left it a generation behind in MP3 phones. To launch an iTunes phone based on replaceable memory card technology would be a tremendous mistake so Motorola has spent the last half year scrambling to increase capacity in a way that doesn't demand significant mechanical change.

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    3. Re:Pictures and specs by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      I haven't read all the specs but it looks very similar to my Motorola E398 which also has mp3 player function.

      It's really quite pointless compared to my iPod. It has an SD card which comes with 64 MB. I suppose you could upgrade that, but it's still not much space. The quality sounds really nice but I don't think they've really matured as of yet. One reason why I think so is that the processor that these cell phones use are too slow for the software. My user experience is that there's a significant wait time for the loading of mp3 player applications.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    4. Re:Pictures and specs by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

      Photoshop rules!

      --
      Trust me, I work for the government.
  64. Apple Video Store by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    As a longtime Apple watcher, and more significantly a longtime Apple press watcher, I think that this is a red herring. Apple seems to be pretty good at having someone leak believable disinformation to the press to get the media herd pointed in the wrong direction. That way, the herd is surprised when the new Apple product is not the long-rumored cellphone or PDA, and they bleat even more loudly when it is something else. Thus the herd will talk about it even more and be more likely to praise Apple and the new product ... provided of course that Apple doesn't produce the consumer electronics/computing equivalent of Beef Ice Cream.

    That being said, I think it could be the video store that Apple has supposedly been working on, possibly with Sony. Certainly they have the infrastructure to deliver the product, given all that they've done for iTMS. Since this has been long-awaited and the media herd is bleating about the phone, I'll place $10 on the video store at 10-1.

    Too bad Vegas doesn't make book on these things. Trust me, those bookies in Vegas know how things will break, because their livelihood depends on it. More, if they are working for a guy with a name like "Vinnie the Nose", their lives may depend on it. If you want to see how a sports season will turn out, look at Vegas' oddsmakers.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  65. Re:100 songs? No way! by amarkham · · Score: 1

    That was my impression as well when I read the event ad. My guess? Apple is planning on a September 7th launch of the vaunted video iPod on the West Coast, while allowing Moto to launch the iTunes phone on the East Coast at the same time. Talk about dropping the bomb...

    (oh and if the iTunes phone is candybar-form and not RAZR-frm, I'll be bmmd and will wait for the RAZR vrsn)

  66. Creative will try to shut it down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    well, this is all moot, now that Creative has won a patent that covers the iPod interface.

    how much you want to bet they seek an injunction before September 7? :->

  67. With scroll-wheel for rotary dialing by Been+on+TV · · Score: 1

    I understand it will come fitted with the original iPod rotary scroll wheel for rotary dialing. ;)

    --
    The future is in beta
  68. Re:100 songs? No way! by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    Nah, the phone will incorporate something called "iradio" which will let you link the phone's playlist to your home PC's music collection.

    Anything you have at home, you can stream to the phone. And if you don't have it, you can use iTunes to buy it and then stream to the phone.

    Is it just me or does this sound a bit like glorified "music on hold" and a great way to make sure I have no battery left for making actual calls. There must be a service fee involved.

    I'd rather save my battery for calling the boss or my SO or 911 when needed instead of playing music.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  69. yeah clickwheel dialing would never work by IshanCaspian · · Score: 1

    Man, what a crackpot idea, dialing a phone using a circular motion....hogwash.

    Oh, wait...

    http://williamstown.k12.ma.us/weblessons/SimpleMac hines_Culnane4/images/RotaryPhone.jpg

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    1. Re:yeah clickwheel dialing would never work by dthree · · Score: 1

      To make it as usefull as a dial phone, it woud need to have the hook at the end to stop your finger at the right place.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
  70. "Ginger" was to have been revolutionary... by Corf · · Score: 1

    ...four years ago, and look how well that turned out. I for one would be more affected by an iPhone than I have been by that silly overpriced gizmo.

    --
    The pain was excruciating and the scarring is likely permanent, but that just means it's working.
  71. In Other News by TALlama · · Score: 1

    Slashdot user Mictian did not deny the rumours that he is really a energy being fromt he planet ZuTon 4, which means that he obviously is.

    --

    - The Amazina Llama

  72. LiPhone by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Call me when hackers have got it to boot into Linux, with the PalmOS GUI. Then it'll run the SW I want, over the 3G network, with an interface useable on a tiny device. When Verizon and Sprint try to charge me for downloading songs that they have nothing to do with, I'll just stream over a secure tunnel I make to my home computer over my cablemodem. If Apple can't deliver, I'll wait for Palm to hook me up.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:LiPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words...

      Hey, everyone, check the Slashdot front page for new Apple product marketing, no matter how trivial!

    2. Re:LiPhone by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, an integrated iPod and mobile phone, from a new partnership between Apple and Motorola. Whose previous partnership brought us trivial platforms like "the Macintosh". For some value of "trivial" that approaches "momentous". Anonymous miniscule Coward.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  73. Lawyers... by Metroid72 · · Score: 1

    start your engines...

  74. Gah by Jethro · · Score: 1

    Great, cause motorola phones aren't slow enough now when all they're trying to do is DIAL.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. headphones....good guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The software will allow people to transfer songs from a personal computer to the mobile phone, then listen to the songs, presumably through headphones.

  77. bull, its the iPod Video by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1


    First off the announcement hinted at the revolutionary nature of the new product by envoking the invites to remember when Apple first put *1000* songs in their pocket. An iTunes based phone is not revolutionary like that, especially when it is limited to between 100-250 songs. Furthermore, the iTunes based phone has been delayed at least three times now. Would Apple book the event and take a chance that Motorola or Cingular delayed it yet again right before the event? Nope.

    Likewise, the Samsung agreement to purchase 40% of their flash memory is too soon for Apple to bring out an iPod Mini based upon flash (but will happen by Christmas 2005). And I can't see Apple booking an event like this to announce the iPod Mini receiving a color screen (although that would be a great complimentary announcement but Apple would probably wait until the school promotion of getting a free iPod Mini with an iBook expires on Sept. 30th).

    My money is on an iPod Video model. With video blogs becoming popular and the iTune Music Store enabling videos, the time is right. Plus, Apple probably would love to bloody the noses of Archos and Creative a bit more.

    My fingers are crossed that there's some sort of agreement for compatibility with TiVo-To-Go, but I'm sure that won't be the case for now.

    Then again, I was totally wrong with assuming the rumors of switching to Intel chips were incorrect... :0

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  78. Re:Some advice . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitter and illiterate is no way to go through life. Also, remember that all generalizations are wrong.

    Mr. Mac Fanoy

  79. well, this is Apple.. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Run by Steve Jobs.

    Revolutionary usually just means it looks really, really cool.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  80. I know! by Ironweaver · · Score: 1

    They're finally going to announce how I'm going to get my 25 bucks back!

  81. the pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To complete the pattern Apple will sue those (only the little guys) who published the speculation.

  82. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have the wits to figure out how to do something on a cellphone, and am to stubborn to do something sensible like RTFM, so I shall blame Cingular for my own shortcomings.

    1. Re:Translation by Dr.Opveter · · Score: 1
      I know I shouldn't bother with some AC, but for your information TFM did not (as in NOT) provide information regarding the configuration of the voicemail. It tells you to call Cingular and of course you get an automated system that has you running around in circles. I later found out you need to put in some code to have it ring for the maximum of 30 seconds before it goes to voicemail. Disabling the voicemail was not (as in NOT) documented anywhere either, nor could I locate such option in the automated system.

      Maybe the problem also had to do with the phone, but Cingular provided that model with the plan, so I'd expect simple options like these to be available.

      I have a suspicion they actually made it impossible to disable the voicemail, for with a pay to go plan that's where they can make the money

      --
      Sample this!
  83. Apple buys crapload of Flash by fsterman · · Score: 1

    This would fit in with their buying of 40 percent of Samsung's second finanical half output of flash memory.

    Even a 1 gig phone with my iPod would be pretty nice. Now if only they used allofmp3.com instead of the iTunes music store.

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  84. Re:au revoir Verizon - me too by dthree · · Score: 1

    I called verizon to double-check that my contract was satisfied and that I would have no fees if I cancelled. After telling me, they asked why I wanted to cancel my account. I told them I wanted to switch to a carrier that didn't disable features on their phones and would allow me to sync the basic functions of the phone (address book, calendar, ringtones, graphics) with my computer. The rep then argued with me that I needed a smartphone to do that. When I said I didn't need the extra functionality that a smartphone has and wasn't willing to pay that much she said that "advance features come at an increased cost". Well, thanxcyabuhbye, verizon. I'm not going to waste any more time when i know that other carriers have low-cost phones that work the Apple iSync. It's like they don't want to listen, just argue with you.

    --
    "I forgot my mantra."
  85. My wild guess by reshin · · Score: 1

    A phone or standalone device with full access to the entire iTunes catalog at a low annual resubscription rate. Maybe the pricing is integrated with a phone plan? $60 annually standalone or maybe phone plan + $5 per month?

  86. They Got it Backwards by Lord+of+the+Fries · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen the form factor of this thing yet... so I may be off base here. I think they're getting it wrong. I don't want to listen to or buy music with my phone. My phone sits in my pocket/holster, is hard to get at, and any day I "forget" it at home, I'm actually kind of happy.

    But I love to borrow my daughter's iPod shuffle. I can wear it and listen to it for hours. Tile the bathroom floor with it, etc. The point is, its pleasent to be plugged into for long periods. But I've noticed that when I play the music loud (which is always), I don't hear the phone down the hall unless I manage to figure out how to hook up its ringer to the subwoofer and shake the house to its core.

    So I was thinking... wouldn't it be cool if the iPod hooked into the phone network, and when someone called, the music dimms and gentle "pinging" is plexed in. The lanyard has one of those throat mikes on it. Through some action, I choose to answer the call (or not and the volume return and pinging goes away), the music cuts out completely, and now it's just like I'm using Skype with a headset.

    --
    One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
    1. Re:They Got it Backwards by dthree · · Score: 1

      There are a few products on the market that can do something like this. Here is one headset that plugs into your phone and audio player, allowing you to listen to music, make and take calls without reaching into your pocket:

      http://skullcandy.com/linkDetail.php?urlLocation=l ink

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
  87. VoIP,iTunes,Cellphone... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    Apple's retooled remember? It pulled the iPhone off the release date the last time. Why? VoIP. Integration with your computer. It'll blow your mind. Apple may even move into the VoIP business model.

    That's wild guess...

  88. One button? why not? by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1

    Given good speech recognition, or at least a touchscreen, why have buttons at all? Maybe one for activating the voice-dial feature, but otherwise, why not? you're going to be talking anyway...

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  89. Di$ney mobile?...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that phone immediately hang up, and send an alert to the FBI, giving your excact location (via built in GPS ) the moment it picks up any Di$ney
    material that you might have playing in the background while talking to someone?

  90. Final step by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Nokia is releasing a tablet computer with no cell phone capabilities

    Makes sense to me, have you used the most recent phones? I'm not even sure you can figure out how to make a call on them if you wanted to between the cameras, video, and browsing features. The phone feature was just dead weight that was costing too much to keep in the phone.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Final step by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      I have a Nokia 6230, which I bought in the last 3 months. Making a call is very easy; just type in the number and hit the green 'call' button.

      Of course, if you want to use the address book, you will have to navigate through a bit of menus, which I think would be true of any phone.

      I haven't tried recent phones from other makers, but I will bet they are just as easy to dial with. My last phone was a motorola i60, and if you hit the down arrow on the navigation pad, you got the recent calls list. Nice! Too bad the 6230 doesn't do it like that.

      C'mon, dude, you're exagerating. They are phones first and foremost. Just punch in the number and hit dial. I challenge you to present me with any phone on the market which doesn't work that way.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:Final step by TheGreek · · Score: 1

      My last phone was a motorola i60, and if you hit the down arrow on the navigation pad, you got the recent calls list. Nice! Too bad the 6230 doesn't do it like that.

      Mine does.

    3. Re:Final step by TheGreek · · Score: 1

      Er...that's how you get the phonebook.

      Get recent calls by just pressing send.

  91. Beyond Branding by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The interesting thing about an Apple phone though is that likley it would have an effect on the hardware itself, rather than just changing the package and faceplate of some generic phone. So it's really a step beyond simple branding.

    In a way I guess you can call this an evolution of branding into IP branding, that combines marketing with technical IP to add features to something it otherwise could not have.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  92. I'd say... by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

    as long as they (a) revolutionize cell phone UI in some way and (b) add one or two features customers would really love (maybe open WiFi and/or open computer/peripheral connectivity via USB), it should make some pretty big waves in the cell phone market. Camera is fine in or out, music player is totally optional although a separate Shuffle battery may accomplish that without much trouble. Of course, we're talking Cingular, whose reception is still rather sucky in many places.

    Before people write off Apple in this venture, I'd say you should read the original comments about the iPod before making rash statements here...

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  93. Bluetooth earpiece by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1
    Oh yeah - all that 196 KHz sampling has done so much good now! Play this thing over the wireless headset, and all music deteriorates to the quality of the "lite rock" loop they are playing to keep you on hold.

    Run DMC? sounds like Kenny G!

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  94. It's implicit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashcode expects an implicit opening sarcasm tag, duh. This feature was clearly added by some perl programmer.

  95. iPod Name by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 0

    I'm sure whatever it is, if it has the iPod name on it, it will sell like hotcakes. Think of the Shuffle. If any other brand tried to market that piece of shit, they'd have trouble selling it to anyone.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
  96. Early Adopters by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    USB works fine for all my peripheral needs right now thank you very much. The day you cant point me to an external hard drive that uses PCI-X and has a standard cable that doesn't cost an arm and two heads, then I'll take what you said a little more seriously. That's the problem with you early adopters. You find some new technology you think is going to be the end all and be all for the rest of time and you run with it. Only to find out that no one agreed with you because it was either, too expensive or way too unstable. I mean look at SCSI. That was a dismal failure on the desktop. Apple invented it and tried to push it as a standard, but they didn't get anywhere because it was godawful expensive and terribly unstable. Eventually it got into server rooms (only God knows why) and today we're stuck with legacy nightmares from the SCSI background.

    Most of the SAN technologies were built with SCSI technology but ony after decades of revision made them reliable and stable. The pricepoint is still prohibitive though. That's why any server room I run is using ATA drives in Windows 2K boxes with dynamic disks. I've got one box with 20 drives providing the bulk of storage for my organization. The drives are all concatenated into one big dynamic disk that then gets partitioned the way I need it. The best of security from NTFS on DOS and the best of performance by having all the drive spindles moving at the same speed. Try that with your antiquated OS X and BSD boxes. Oh what? You can't? I'm sorry you made the wrong choise to go with SCSI because you are early adopters.

    The same thing is going to happen with these phones. You'll buy into them only to be green with envy when Microsoft debuts "Microsoft Phone 2008". We'll see who has the last laugh then.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  97. it's not a ipod phone it's a itunes phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well more like a phone with itunes.

    Doubt I'll switch service providers to get one. Highly doubt it.

    d
    out

  98. Cassette recording quality (Was Re:Only Fools...) by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    Good question. It might surprise you, but I was at a B&O store the other day and when I was talking to the salesman the same subject came up, and it turns out there's a good reason. Apparently, in a lot of areas, because people are adding more and more devices to their homes (lights, home computers, TVs, etc), the actual quality of the electric supply received by your Hi-fi devices is actually dropping. What's happening is that instead of getting a smooth 60Hz 120V supply, you're getting a whole bunch of frequencies overlaid on that.

    Now, you have to understand that most audio equipment is designed around an "ideal" supply of a smooth 60Hz (or close to it) frequency, not one with warbles overlaid. So when you record your tapes and listen to them (both times!) you're getting, essentially, noise from your TV and from your home computer, overlaid on the tape. It's not just the audio, but, like from the TV, the vision part of the signal, and from the computer the raw data going from your memory to your CPU, plus bigger spikes as your hard disk head is moved around or your CD tray opens.

    And don't think you're safe using batteries either. The fact your AC wiring goes all around your house means that a magnetic field containing exactly the same type of interference is being generated, and, thanks to the faraday-cage nature of the wiring, is actually being reflected into it.

    What you need is a "voltage smoother". They're a little bit expensive. A lot of people think you need one for the hifi, but as the salesman was telling me, that's not true, you're trying to preserve the integrity of the current in the entire house, not just for the hifi, because if you didn't, you still get the electro-magnetic field interfering with your recordings. So you need to get one for every electric device you have that plugs into the mains. This will protect your circuits, and ensure you get a good quality electric supply.

    Also consider one of those specially shielded AC cables. They're really good.

    I did it. The entire thing in the end cost me a hair under $10,000, but the results are amazing. My hi-fi sounds like a concert hall now. The accoustics are, frankly, stunning. I didn't realise what a major difference poor quality AC current would make.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  99. Motorola E815 & V710 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both have a transflash slot that will support up to 512 mb ram through the phones mp3 player.

    How is this any different?

  100. NO WAY. by tivoKlr · · Score: 1
    I've been a T-Mobile customer for 5 years and for the most part their phone selection sucks. Always 6 months after other carriers get a new phone T-Mobile slides it into their lineup, case in point the RAZR. Cingular had it for 9 months or so and T-Mobile just picks it up.

    Not that I'm complaining, I like my new RAZR *grins*

    Try comparing rate plans to Cingular and you'll see why they wait until phones are cheaper, you get 1.5-2.0x minutes for the money. No rollover though *shrug*

    --
    Ocean is land, covered with water.
  101. Re:Cassette recording quality (Was Re:Only Fools.. by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    That makes a lot of sense, but I doubt our Certron cassette using friend would have understood that. I've been eyeing the gold plated power leads at my local audio shop for a while now. Maybe I should treat myself to a splurge and get the shielded ones. They're about $175 per cable. By the way, do you know if I would need one voltage smoother per power strip, or should I get one per receptacle in the power strip? I know it might push the price up a bit, but I read an article a few months back in Audiomage magazine that mentioned how the introduction of microwave devices such as microwaves, cell phones and hig speed desktop supercomputers can cause problems in power strips. Due to the micro nature of microwaves, the wiring in a powerstrip is akin to the wiring in a house. All of the same factors you mention above apply within the power strip. So my assumption would be that I'd need some kind of power filtering suppository for the power strip. Does that sound right to you?

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  102. Salami Speakers? by n8_f · · Score: 1
    I loved this line from the Think Secret writeup, which references the New York Times article:
    The phone, the Times said, will allow users to "listen to the songs, presumably through headphones," as opposed to listening to them through salami sandwiches, as originally presumed.
  103. Re:Cassette recording quality (Was Re:Only Fools.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    Well, thanks both of you with the advice. That's more what I thought the problem was, a friend was telling me that I should waste money on replacing the Certron cassettes, and I really didn't want to spend money on something like that if the problem was elsewhere.

    I've noticed my microwave oven causes all sorts of problems when I use my cordless phone. Do you think it is partially responsible for the poor quality recordings I've been getting, or does it not really output that much power (I don't think phones do) and the microwave oven is a more likely bet?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  104. Re:Cassette recording quality (Was Re:Only Fools.. by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It all has to do with frequencies and harmonics. It really could be either device because the frequency of your cell phone is more likely to have a harmonic relationship with the sounds on your cassette since the phone is used for voice transmissions. But, there are other factors like the color of the paint in the room you're listening to the recordings in. Green paint happens to have a harmonic relationship with sounds in the 22.5 kHz range which is just above the normal hearing range. (Although I can personally hear up into the 32 kHz range myself) Since most people can't hear that high, a room painted with olive green paint is the best listening environment possible.

    It's preferrable to paint that color, in flat, on the ceilings, walls, floors and most funrnishings. Plus you want all of your furnishings and decor to be flat green as well. My couch and loveseat are olive green velvet. That provides the least reflection of other colors of light that would mar the quality of your playback. If you can afford to go this far, even replacing the light bulbs with green lights would help tremendously. Since I'm color blind that has the negative effect of making it look like the room turns black when I flip on the green lights. So I had to go with yellow which isn't as good but it's better than nothing. Chances are you might be able to do the green light thing though.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  105. Sure, you're correct by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "I'll ditch Verizon in a heartbeat. And I'll send them a letter telling them how much I resent their effort to control what kind of tecnology they'll allow on their network."

    That's an aspect of Verizon's behavior that is regrettable. At the same time, they do offer some things that I really care about in a phone:

    1) Their national coverage is outstanding.
    2) The customer service people are actually helpful.
    3) They allow you to use data essentially "for free" on their network (60-120K, depending on area).

    Really, a phone is a phone, and in my view, the fact that I can't get an ipod built into my phone pales in comparison to being able to get a signal pretty much anywhere.

    Yes, what they did with bluetooth is dumb, but all the cellular carriers treat their customers like sheep, so I'm not surprised.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  106. Well DUH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It takes 10-15 minutes to fill my 4G iPod mini over FireWire"

    Well Duh, you hardly ever fill the whole thing.

    When you add songs to your iPod, its usually an album at a time (or for you ADHD kids who listen to singles only, one song at a time), so that's about 50M of data. Easily do-able over WiFi in under a minute.

    Enough excuses for Apple. Get it done and stop whining.

  107. Re:Cassette recording quality (Was Re:Only Fools.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only someone who is colour-blind would advocate painting a room Olive Green.
    Are your sure you're not thinking of Maroon?

  108. Battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool. Now I should have enough battery life to listen to mp3's until lunchtime..

    Tough shit for anyone who actually wants to call me after then.

  109. The wonders of rebranding by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    Apple is releasing an iPod cell phone, while Nokia is releasing a tablet computer with no cell phone capabilities.

    I dount Nokia are making a tablet PC. It will be made by another company and released under the nokia brand; this type of thing is extremely common. I remember there was once a point when there were only four widescreen TV-tube factories in the world, and all the manufactures sourced their parts from them. I'm stitting here with two Triniton displays in front of me (tell-tale black horizonal lines at 1/3 and 2/3 positions), yet neither is branded by Sony.

  110. Re:Lets use the iPod as an example of why this is by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1


    It should be a phone. It shouldn't be a web browswer, PSP, or run my house. It should also be a data point. I should be able to do nothing more than pair my mac with my iPhone and it should just work from that point on as a data point (in the absense of anything faster / cheaper).


    why not? The Japanese have been making decent Web Browsing phones for a bit now. I Mode does kind of suck but compared to newer phones...

    Easy to use and having multiple functions aren't mutually exclusive on a hand held yet developers and consumers treat it as such.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  111. Totally sweet. by xmorg · · Score: 1

    OMG sweetness, I love ipods! I dont have one beacuse its too expensive but they are so cool!!! are these going to be 49.99???

  112. Bad haiku! No biscuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need three syllables on the first and third lines, and five on the second to form a proper haiku.

    So close, and yet so far...

  113. Does Apple make desk assistants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's going to have no buttons, like the mighty mouse. You just squeeze it in a certain way to start a song, and a different certain way to call people. It's going to be so easy, nobody will be able to figure it out.
    Sounds a lot like my secretary.
  114. 100 songs too few? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if people are wiling to buy a psp for the movies instead of a portable DVD player and buy movies at inferior quality just to play them on a sucky system which is the only means to play them. I think apple can sell a product inferior to an iPod and make money.

  115. hurray for podcasting by inline_four · · Score: 1

    Finally. This will detach podcast listeners from their computers. As long as it has enough storage space, this should be a big boon for the medium.

    --
    Alexey
  116. Re:Bad haiku! No biscuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You idiot. If you had been around slashdot for longer than 5 minutes, you'd know he was mocking Taco's original review of the iPod.

    "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."

    This turned out to be one of the most wrong calls in the history of tech, made by our beloved taco.

  117. Been there, done that... by eakthecat · · Score: 1

    FYI: Nokia already offers a one-button cell phone - the Nokia 7280. Actually, it's closer to an iPod's scroll wheel, but still...

    --
    Solitary, Poor, Nasty, Brutish and Not Quite As Tall As I'd Like To Be.
  118. Re:au revoir Verizon - me too by xjerky · · Score: 1

    Well, then the Verizon girl lied even further, because Verizon also crippled their Treo 650, which is one of the "smartest" smartphones out there. I have the Cingular model, and a coworker had the Verizon version. She took a pic that she wanted to xfer to her machine, and I told her to just use Bluetooth. But she couldn't figure out how. We went back and forth about the proper steps, until I finally looked at her Treo, and I saw with my own eyes that selecting send on a picture goes immediately to the built-in email app, which of course uses SMS. My version gives me a dialog box asking if you want to use IR, Bluetooth, email, etc. A $600 phone and Verizon is still pulling this shit.

    Now, there are 3rd party Palm apps which will let you do it (Filez is probably the best), but why the fuck should the customer have to jump through hoops like this?

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  119. And a backpack for the battery? by argent · · Score: 1
    I'm actually not asking for a lot:

    A GSM/GPRS/UMTS phone, preferably one that takes two SIMs, allowing it to listen on two networks simultaneously. Quadband and UMA support would beperfect

    A 3 megapixel Kodak-quality camera

    The ability to act as an 802.11g peer or hub, with the machine showing up as a basic server on the network that you can just copy files to and from, plus network routing for when the phone's in GPRS/etc mode.

    A 10G (or better) mini-HD, so I can store all my music rather than have to decide what music I'm going to listen to in advance

    Good MP3 and Ogg support

    Standardized 2.5mm handsfree and 3.5mm stereo headset jacks

    Openable to reveal a landscape touchscreen plus a minikeyboard


    Don't forget:
    A Pony.

    A backpack for the battery.
    Personally, I want my old Nokia back, with its monochrome screen and no data service or ringtones and enough battery life that I could use it for a whole long weekend without charging or rationing...
    1. Re:And a backpack for the battery? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      It's 2005, not 1995.

      My current phone does GSM and GPRS. A camera is a little bit of a powerhog, but the circuitry doesn't have to be turned on except when it's being used. 802.11g shouldn't be any worse than bluetooth, and again it doesn't have to be on all the time. The HD is a little power consuming, but when not in use... MP3 and Ogg support doesn't really come into it. The 2.5mm handsfree doesn't come into it. And the landscape screen - well, my old 9290 had that, and battery life was close to a week.

      I don't think there's any reason to have a "backpack for the batteries". And honestly, if you grafted the circuitry for the camera, HD, and 802.11g into the 9290, updated the software, and standardized the audio jacks, you'd end up with something capable of implementing what I'd want.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:And a backpack for the battery? by argent · · Score: 1

      It's 2005, not 1995.

      Let's split the difference. The phone I had in 2000 could easily go a long weekend of casual use out of range of AC without worrying about it going flat. It had over a week of standby, and a day of heavy use didn't mean obsessing over getting it plugged in by the time I got home.

      It also never rebooted at 3AM playing a darling little tune and scaring the hell out of the cat (and hence me).

      I don't know if it had longer legs than your 9290, but it was at the very least no worse. And...

      my old 9290 had that, and battery life was close to a week. ... your phone weighed, what, 3x as much as my little "bar" and was half again as long. And mine phone was at the upper end of the size that was worth carrying.

    3. Re:And a backpack for the battery? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Let's split the difference. The phone I had in 2000 could easily go a long weekend of casual use out of range of AC without worrying about it going flat. It had over a week of standby, and a day of heavy use didn't mean obsessing over getting it plugged in by the time I got home.
      Just like my Nokia 9290, you mean?
      my old 9290 had that, and battery life was close to a week. ... your phone weighed, what, 3x as much as my little "bar" and was half again as long. And mine phone was at the upper end of the size that was worth carrying.
      Is this an issue to you? You do know there's a variety of phones around today of different wieghts and sizes. If I'm replacing an iPod, cellphone, camera, and PDA, a phone that wieghts "3 times as much" to your "little bar" is hardly a major issue.

      Really, honestly, it doesn't sound like you've touched a new phone since 2000, nor does have you ever used any electronic device that had to be carried around with the exception of your cellphone. I don't carry a PDA at the moment, not because I don't want one, but because carrying those and everything else is a pain. I usually leave the iPod at the office. They all may be small in theory, but in practice, the sheer quantity of these redundant bits of electronics means their portability is simply non-existant. My iPod might just as well be as big as a suitcase and it'd be no less portable.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:And a backpack for the battery? by argent · · Score: 1

      Just like my Nokia 9290, you mean?

      That's why I noted that I didn't know "if it had longer legs than your 9290, but it was at the very least no worse."

      You do know there's a variety of phones around today of different wieghts and sizes.

      And battery life, just like in 2000. And the longer the battery life, all other things being equal, the bigger the battery (and thus the phone) has to be.

      My Nokia got briefly replaced by a Pocket PC phone that supported MP3 playing and bluetooth, and I had a Wifi card for it. I couldn't realy use the MP3 support, because it ran the battery down faster than the phone did on standby... and then when my battery ran down because I was on the phone for too long, I couldn't call out on a wired line to complete the call because the phone number I needed was in the PDA I couldn't use because the battery was flat.

      That was enough for me. That much convergence in devices will have to weight for new battery technology.

      My new phone is about 1/3 shorter but actually heavier than my old bar, it's harder to use, and if I forget to charge it at least very other day (which means I end up having to charge it every) it's toast. It's got a color screen and ringtone support and some kind of internet software and a game downloader that I couldn't be arsed figuring out how to use.

      I carry a PDA, a phone, and usually an iPod shuffle. If I don't carry the shuffle it's not because it's too many things, it's because the earphones are too much of a pain to deal with.

      All put together they weigh less than your 9000, and fit in different pockets so no one of them is bulky enough to matter...

      I don't have to worry about not being able to place a call or get to my PDA's data because my MP3 player ran them down.

      And I don't have to leave my PDA behind when I go somewhere phones aren't allowed.

      And if someone ganks my iPod I can afford to just buy a new one.

      I don't carry a camera much, though I did for most of last summer for a photo project. It's not something I'm much nterested in... but if I was going to get one I'd buy something like a Zire 72 rather than a camera phone... the PDA has more "slack" in the battery life than the phone does because it's not running a radio transceiver all the time.

  120. Some words from the FUTURE! by Narcoleptic+Electron · · Score: 1

    Folks, I have travelled back in time to let you all know what is being announced on September 7.

    People, it is big.