Slashdot Mirror


Austrian Town Sees the Light

pin_gween writes "The Austrian town of Rattenberg (a 10 minute walk from sunlight during the winter) plans to install a mirror on a mountain to redirect sunlight towards the town. The town was built in the winter shadow of Rat Mountain. The plan is to place heliostat mirrors to shine light in several locations around town, where villagers could 'congregate and get sunned up.' The EU is ponying up half the $2.4 million costs. The company installing the mirrors, Bartenbach Lichtlabor GmbH, is contributing $600,000, and hopes other communities will use their technology."

339 comments

  1. ob Southpark by narkotix · · Score: 3, Funny

    SIMPSONS DID IT!!

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    1. Re:ob Southpark by shrewd · · Score: 4, Informative

      actually simpsons did the complete opposite, go on mark me informative ive earned it.

  2. Potential Problem by SlashSquatch · · Score: 5, Funny

    If there's a glitch in focusing, then the people get fried like ants?

    --
    Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
    1. Re:Potential Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the moment their server is fried like an ant. Hope for the people's sake that this is the slashdot effect!

    2. Re:Potential Problem by Threni · · Score: 1

      > If there's a glitch in focusing, then the people get fried like ants?

      A glass pyramid was going to be installed next to a French art gallery and was scrapped because of fears it'd start fires, burn or blind people. I hope these guys are well insured!

    3. Re:Potential Problem by wulfhound · · Score: 4, Informative

      A glass pyramid /is/ installed next to the most famous French art gallery of all, the Louvre. It serves as an entranceway and atrium roof to some of the underground part of the gallery.

    4. Re:Potential Problem by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Funny
      If there's a glitch in focusing, then the people get fried like ants?

      You say that like this would be some kind of a reason not to do it.

    5. Re:Potential Problem by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Funny


      And it's where the remains of Mary Magdeline are kept.

      //worst book I've ever enjoyed reading. I'm so ashamed.

      --
      sig?
    6. Re:Potential Problem by ivan+kk · · Score: 1

      Just the hit new reality TV show I've been waiting for.

    7. Re:Potential Problem by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

      if there is a glitch? Man, I hope there aren't any hackers with a mean streak there. The first thing I thought of was.... I wonder if I can buy a fresnel lens that big... You know where I am going with this. Would that qualify as a weapon of mass destruction? You could really do some damage.

    8. Re:Potential Problem by Threni · · Score: 1

      I'm having trouble backing up my post using Google. Perhaps the original idea was for a sphere, and was changed to a pyramid, or maybe the sphere is inside the pyramid. I'm not making it up for the sake of it!

    9. Re:Potential Problem by SlashSquatch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Also do they plan to reflect the visible or UV spectrum or both?

      You know they could sunbathe all day in the visible and still be white as their sheep, not bronzed like the governor of CA.

      "I've sold heliostats to Brockway, Ogdenville and North Haverbrook."

      --
      Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
    10. Re:Potential Problem by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

      As long as someone can capture it on video and put up a torrent, I think its worth the risk.

    11. Re:Potential Problem by obii · · Score: 1

      Shhhh, you can't possibly tell those pagans the exact location of the Holy Grail!

      This is a secret not to be unveiled to these people!

      Conspirative Greetings

    12. Re:Potential Problem by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      If you follow the Mary Magdalene is the grail, and drinking from the grail would give you eternal life . . .

      I wonder if she shaves? I'm going to hell for that one.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    13. Re:Potential Problem by LadyReader · · Score: 1

      See Lois McMaster Bujold's book "Komarr". A solar mirror which beams down sunlight to an energy-deprived planet is destroyed. The hero investigates... Great book.

    14. Re:Potential Problem by millennial · · Score: 1

      There was never a "scrapped" plan, per se. There was a contest to design a new Louvre entrance, and the pyramid was the one they chose as the winner.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    15. Re:Potential Problem by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      And have they even thought of the cost of Windex over the next few years alone?

    16. Re:Potential Problem by Bun · · Score: 1

      If you follow the Mary Magdalene is the grail, and drinking from the grail would give you eternal life . . .

      I thought it was more like it was holy blood, not a holy cup (sang raal vs. san graal), and referred to the Merovingian kings of France being decendants of Jesus. So, if drinking the holy blood makes you immortal...(/me skips the obvious vampire joke.)

      --
      "Anyone that has ever gotten an idea based on any of my work and done something better with it-good for you."--J.Carmack
  3. Rattenberg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Let's see, Ratten means rats and Berg means mountain.
    So we have a town here called Ratsmountain that doesn't get any sunlight during winter time and worst off all, it's Austrian ;-D

    Now if that doesn't sound like a great place to spend your winter holidays...

  4. All good until... by intmainvoid · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I'm sure it'll all go well, til some kid stares at the mirror for too long and goes blind, and sues the pants of someone.

    (never mind that the kid probably would have been just as happy staring at the sun...)

    1. Re:All good until... by drstock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is in Europe, not USA. You can't sue the pants of anyone here, especially not for your own stupidity.

      --
      My other comment is funny
    2. Re:All good until... by alvarl · · Score: 1

      Mind you, this is Europe. Possibly your comment was meant as a joke...

      I'm not really into all these prejudices about US legal system and 'constant suing of each other's asses off' but hey, people _are_ kidding about it ;)

    3. Re:All good until... by c9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is in Austria, which is not part of the US. c9

    4. Re:All good until... by magicchex · · Score: 1

      Except, being in the shadow of the mountain, there would have been no sun to stare at.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    5. Re:All good until... by dramenbejs · · Score: 1
      I'm sure it'll all go well, til some kid stares at the mirror for too long and goes blind, and sues the pants of someone.
      You are probably wrong, since Austria is not in USA ;-).
    6. Re:All good until... by korea · · Score: 1

      Why would the kid sue someone's pants specifically?

      --

      --

      "pain is weakness leaving the body."
    7. Re:All good until... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      This is in Austria, which is not part of the US.

      Yet.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:All good until... by uradu · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Why would the kid sue someone's pants specifically?

      Sue their pants OFF. You know these kids nowadays, they can never get enough pr0n, even if they have to sue for it.

    9. Re:All good until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that's where the wallet is, obviously.

    10. Re:All good until... by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Sue the Lederhosen off of someone.

      Better?

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    11. Re:All good until... by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      Well, if they were Dinosaur Neil's pants...

      I'm not entirely certain, but I think that that episode of The Tick was the only TV plot EVER resolved by a giant dose of aspirin.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    12. Re:All good until... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why both you and the OP would want to sue anyone's pants??

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    13. Re:All good until... by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      George W. Bush was waiting until after Thanksgiving to announce his plans of liberating Austria to make it a state,... just so his buddy Ah-nuld can run for President in '08!

    14. Re:All good until... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      That's because the EU won't let their 'subjects' do anything.

      Had one such person asking about plans for shops to build an airplane in. Turns out that a person isn't allowed to just start building something in his own garage anytime he so chooses. A government inspector must come around first and approve his workspace. Personally, I was somewhat taken aback by the intrusiveness, but he seemed to take is a normal.

      Can't be sued if the government has to approve everything first anyway.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  5. earlier by manojar · · Score: 1, Funny

    There was this project about a decade back - to light up scandinavian countries (or is it Greenland), to bring light the same way. The environmentalists raised a stink. Googled, but could not find it; Can anyone throw light on that one?

    1. Re:earlier by dbolger · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, but if somebody could find a 'mirror'... ;D

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

    2. Re:earlier by wulfhound · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was certainly a project along those lines planned for a remote part of Siberia, using a large space-based mirror.

    3. Re:earlier by vidarh · · Score: 1

      ... and for those that wonder how it turned out: The mirror never folded out properly, so the project failed, and I don't think they tried a second time.

    4. Re:earlier by boaworm · · Score: 1

      Mirror, Siberia, the Sun..hm. I think that project even has a website

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    5. Re:earlier by famebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was this project about a decade back - to light up scandinavian countries (or is it Greenland), to bring light the same way. The environmentalists raised a stink.

      That's different; they were lighting up latitudes that simply don't have sunlight throgh part of the year, and with wildlife being adjusted to that.

      This village has normal dayligt for its region, it is just in the shade a lot. The mirror is just out of the shade, with normal dayligt hours, not up in space catching light when there should be night on the ground.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    6. Re:earlier by arabagast · · Score: 1

      This was being planned for a norwegain "town" Rjukan in 2003, but the plan never saw the light of day.. hah :)

      --
      Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
      Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
  6. If you can't stand the heat... by Anyd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't this fall into the category of "don't live there?" I'm not saying it wouldn't suck to live in an area without sunlight, but to knowingly move into said area, and then use taxpayer's money (correct me if I'm wrong, I'm assuming EU money = EU taxpayer's money) to change that... in the tone of millions... just seems stupid. It just seems that our global community should spend $ on better things than trying to cram people into every possible nook and cranny on earth!

    1. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Doesn't this fall into the category of "don't live there?"

      Well, yes, probably. That said, I wonder if this might actually attract a certain type of warped tourist to the town? The City of Eternal Darkness, lit only by giant mirrors that reflect an eerie faded sunlight onto its dismal roofs... Chances are something Lovecraftian lives there.

      Myself, I'd be heading up the hill to stick a giant cut-out of a bat onto one of the mirrors :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, why should my hard earned wonga be used to fund improvements in someone elses life style. If they want the mirror they should pay for it.

    3. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by TorKlingberg · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's a cool technology project. Don't whine so much. $2.4 million isn't much for a such project.

    4. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Mindjiver · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Of course one should whine. This is tax payers money taken by force from the rightfull owners, it should be spent wisely.

      --
      I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    5. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by vidarh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not millions. $1.2 million to improve quality of life for around 400 people. In other words around $3000 per inhabitant, or far less than most of them are paying in taxes in a single year. Combined with the fact that this project serves a dual purpose of helping this town and also of growing interest for the EU based mirror manufacturer's business worldwide, and it's likely economically a good long term investment - Both promoting growth in a town that's currently in decline as well as increasing exports from the company involved and boosting taxable revenue that way.

    6. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by manojar · · Score: 0, Troll
      "Rattenberg was built between the hill to the south and the Inn River to the north starting in the 1300s for protection against marauders. Back then, lack of sunshine was a small price to pay for relative security.
      But as such dangers diminished, dozens more settlements sprang up. Some, like Kramsach, are just half a mile away and all enjoy a few hours of sun on a clear winter's day."


      Just another case of Europeans hanging on to mediaeval lifestyle. There were some towns in Italy evacuated due to mudslides in the 50s and 70s, why can't do that instead of spending 6000 per person? It could atleast be used for unemployment benefits!

    7. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by vidarh · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Oh, and I guess you missed the part of this town being built in the 1300s, and currently being in decline because people are moving OUT of it, not in... Most people currently living there have lived there all their lives, and now they are getting what could be a significant improvement in quality of life at a small fraction of what they've paid in taxes over those years.

      So it's not about cramming people into every nook and cranny, but about maintaining and possible growing a settlement which already have an established residential area, that employ people, that have established infrastructure etc.

      The likely cost to society of having these people put pressure on house prices etc. by moving elsewhere would likely easily outweigh the $1.2 million the EU is spending all by itself.

    8. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh fuck off already! you're saying that people shouldn't use technology in order to improve their quality of life in a particular environment - come off it!!

      2.4 million is pretty cheap for this kinda thing really, and besides if you want to bash people for living in stupid places there are plenty of better choices for your disdain than these folks - how about New Orleans, "Any place regularly hit by tornados", vast-areas of sub-saharan africa, bangladesh, holland, the autralian outback - - in fact, better idea why don't we all just climb on top of each other and live in a few 'choice' spots, because everyone *knows* there wouldn't be any need for technology to help us live in that situation, it would just be a happy eden-like paradise where food 'appeared' and clear, fresh water would simply bubble out of the ground

      get a fuckin' clue!

    9. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      Inside EU, EU is well known to waste tons of money to stupid projects just like this one. Most of EU money is wasted for "agriculture policy" which means that every man inside EU-agriculture-charity-industry "deserves" money for all products it grows, no metter what amount of it he/she is actually able to sell in the market. Thats why African countries,for example, cannot sell those products to EU.

      --
      839*929
    10. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by magicchex · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the US textile industry.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    11. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could put all the thieving wogs from France there. And then build a wall round it.

    12. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Interesting


      Yeah, good job it doesn't happen anywhere else in the world

      no wait,

      "America's 25,000 cotton farmers received more than $3bn in subsidies last year, equivalent to 100% of the market value of cotton output. This works out at a staggering subsidy of $230 an acre."

      Not that I'm defending the C.A.P.

      some depressing reading :

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,3604,102 0653,00.html

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    13. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by ecbpro · · Score: 1

      You said "In other words around $3000 per inhabitant, or far less than most of them are paying in taxes in a single year." Actually, maybe you won't believe it, but I know that an average inhabitant in Austria pays around 1000 of taxes per month, so then the few millions they want to spend are really not problem. But it does not mean that I support such an idea. Better help the people that really need it. ECBpro

    14. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Moderatbastard · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not an entire country on the march. The population of one small town is going to have an insignificant effect on the housing market in Austria, let alone the whole EU. Unless they all choose to move to the same, equally small, town. But that would be silly.

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    15. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by quigonn · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never been to Austria, otherwise you would know that the majority of all towns were built in valleys, many of them facing exactly the same kind of problem as Rattenberg. And what's the alternative to those mirrors? Migration into cities? No way.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    16. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by quigonn · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I'm Austrian, it is also _my_ money, and I want it to be spent on such a project. One of my grandmothers also lives in a similar valley, and while she lives there very well, it would definitely be a quality improvement if there was a bit more sun during the winters.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    17. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Timbotronic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever been to the Austrian Alps? Think ski lifts stretching to the horizon in every direction, hot Austrian babes, great beer and 13th century villages that you ski into for lunch. It's a *nice* place!

      Also, there's a good chance the residents were born there. You often can't buy real estate in those tiny villages, it's just passed down the generations. I doubt they just moved in and started whinging.

      So I say let them have their mirrors. It's nowhere near as expensive (and environmentally suspect) as air conditioning Las Vegas for example.

      --

      One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    18. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by SerpentMage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Absolutely! And this is why I live in Switzerland and the not the EU! Granted they might build these things in Switzerland, but at least then the Geminde has to pony up the money itself. I do know here in Switzerland when people move their first concern is where the sun rises and sets! If you happen to live on the wrong side of the hill, the house is cheap and remains cheap.

      The worst part of the mirror is that it is an entire waste of money. Consider the following quote from the article.

      "So Lichtlabor plans to create about a dozen "hotspots" - areas not much bigger than a front yard scattered through the town, where townspeople can gather and soak up rays. "

      Now compare that comment to the comment from the beginning of the article.

      "That's because sun is plentiful less than 10 minutes' walk from the town and from Rat Mountain, the 910m hill that blocks its sunlight between November and February each year."

      Let's see, the EU pays 2,400,000 Euros for "hotspots", when they could walk 10 minutes to get the exact same thing! Additionally, as I live near the Alps, during the winter you are cloud covered or in the fog for most of the winter anyways.

      This is an example of pork, plain and simple!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    19. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both promoting growth in a town that's currently in decline

      The town SHOULD be in decline. It's built in the darkness where nobody wants to live. Let it decline. There must be something else they could spend the money on. $3,000 per person no big deal? How about giving me $3,000 dollars worth of taxes back then? That'll boost my town, which isnt stupidly built in darkness.

    20. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in Glenwood Springs, CO for a short time. In the winter, you'd see the sun from about 9:30am to about 2:30pm. The thought of giant mirrors had crossed my mind...

    21. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Mindjiver · · Score: 2

      Well, I live in Sweden and we have more or less no sun during the winter but you don't hear me complaining about it do you? ;) If you really want this giant mirror you should spend austrian money, not polish, not brittish, not swedish.

      --
      I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    22. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I am living there and the village is picturesque. The problem with sunlight exists mainly in the winter time. The village lives from tourism and this would be surely one more tourist attraction.

    23. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "cram people into every possible nook and cranny on earth!" Go watch the Matrix again and pay attention to Agent Smith's classification of humans as a virus...

    24. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If there's cloud cover, the sunlight would be diffuse. They wouldn't need the mirrors.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    25. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah its like that darn New Orleans. I mean, people know its going to flood, right? But they move there anyway and expect tax money to help them out. And like.. New York city, you know, it can't support all those people natively. You need tax payers money to like, make sewers and stuff. Why wouldn't people just move away and poop in the bush?

      Tax payers money gets spent on a LOT of useless things (primarily killing, or "defense contracts"), but improving the quality of life is generally a good thing - as long as it doesn't harm the environment in a severe way.

      Perhaps these people don't have the money to move, or they simply don't want to leave their homes. A lot of people that live out in small country towns and villages get to supply big tax dollars to the huge city infrastructure that they may not agree with. They do it anyway. It's no secret that cities are not self sustaining in any way, shape, or form. The country folk have to pay for the city, AND provide for the cities. Why should they pay for all those people who want to live jammed in together in a detrimental way (environmentally)? Why does so much money get spent to foster that kind of lifestyle?

      If the money is spent on making people happy, and not hurting the environment, or other people, then I say it's a good thing.

      IMO.

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    26. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Echnin · · Score: 1

      So why can't they live with it? Several towns sufficiently far from the equator don't get any sunshine in winter, and the people there aren't complaining.

      --
      Lalala
    27. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a name like Rat Mountain I can only imagine the appeal of creating such a device as opposed to just moving.

    28. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Because several towns sufficiently far from the equator are not ten minutes from sunshine? People in Finland are used to not getting any sun in summer, people in Austria are not.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    29. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      Doesn't this fall into the category of "don't live there?"

      Perhaps, but the same argument can be made regarding any city that isn't completely self-sufficient in resources, which is every city that I can think of. Bringing water to cities in the desert is an obvious example, but even supplying food requires that big money be spent on transportation infrastructure.

    30. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a fuckin' clue!

      you sir/madam are a moron.

    31. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a 10 minute walk from sunlight during the winter

      Okay, seriously 10 minutes? Why wouldn't you just live on the other side of the mountain. If the terrian is too rough or unsuitable for a house there, just go for a friggin walk!

    32. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      How much improvement?
      From the story.
      "So Lichtlabor plans to create about a dozen "hotspots" - areas not much bigger than a front yard scattered through the town,"
      It is not like the entire town will get light. There is a solution and it is happening. People are moving out to near by towns that do get light in the winter.
      Towns and cities grow, and shrink all the time based on the environment. At one time the protection of the hill and the river made it a good place to live. Now things change and other places are more attractive. Will these mirrors help enough? It is worth asking the question isn't it?
      I would say that more well paying jobs would do more than mirrors to help the town.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    33. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It won't even do anything for anyone's quality of life. A few 'hot spots' that will probably give less sunlight than walking ten minutes round the mountain for free.

      And they wonder why people don't like paying taxes, and why people don't trust the EU to do anything other than piss money away.

    34. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      you're saying that people shouldn't use technology in order to improve their quality of life in a particular environment
      I'm saying don't send me the bill.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    35. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but to knowingly move into said area, and then use taxpayer's money to change that...

      If you're in the US, see also the National Flood Insurance Program. We pay people to build on coastlines and floodplains.

      There are a handful of people whose homes we've made into floodplains due to misguided and they deserve to get this, but when you've got a $5M chateau going up on the beach and Bob who welds girders for a living is subsidizing that - well, we start to see the cracks in the Republic.

      Sure, it's all 'self-funded' until a major event happens and they need to 'borrow' from the treasury.

      There's plenty of dry land to build homes on around here but those who influence policy don't wish to live there.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    36. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

      Only $3000? That's still about 3 times as much as the US government spends on each Alaskan resident (Alaska being the largest per capita pork state). It's not like this is critical infrastructure, it's a marginal improvement in the quality of life of a small village, an improvement they've been doing on their own by walking a mere 10 minutes. The exercise is good for them, let them walk! And they wonder why people are so opposed to taxes....

    37. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      stick a giant cut-out of a bat

      damn it the only reason i came in this thread was to say that!

    38. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by srussell · · Score: 1
      If you happen to live on the wrong side of the hill, the house is cheap and remains cheap.
      Wait... are you saying that there is property in Switzerland that isn't expensive?

      I... I hear the words, but... somehow, they don't make any sense.

      --- SER

    39. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like Lower Uncton, where they must kill the last male Bundy!

    40. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Grayraven · · Score: 1

      Actually in Finland you can get sun round the clock in the summer. In the winter, not so much.

      --
      "Source... The Final Frontier" -- keepersoflists.org
    41. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      So I say let them have their mirrors. It's nowhere near as expensive (and environmentally suspect) as air conditioning Las Vegas for example.

      Do they use tax revenues to pay to air-condition Las Vegas?

    42. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      If the money is spent on making people happy, and not hurting the environment, or other people, then I say it's a good thing.

      Please send me all of your money -- I promise it will be spent on making people happy, not hurting the the environment or other people.

    43. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Except most cities are net producers of tax dollars. Due to the higher density, per capita costs on infrastructure are lower. A mile of telephone cable costs about the same in the city as opposed to the country, it's just that mile may have 100 times the people as the countryside. Higher densities are much more manageable with regards to environmental impact.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    44. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you forgot that this project will also help the "growing interest for the EU based mirror manufacturer's business worldwide." Won't you please think of the mirrors?

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    45. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      So this town gets this huge project because they're jealous that they have to walk 10 minutes to get what some others get at their door, and people that don't get it at all have to chip to pay for it.

      Them that's got shall get, and if they ain't got, they don't deserve gettin'.

    46. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Summer, winter where's the difference? I live in Ecuador, you insensitive clod! ;)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    47. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Using the same logic, why the hell are you interested in the Near East? You've got your own oil and if that's not enough you can use some other energy source or move somewhere else. Besides, in addition to giving those people some sunlight, this stuff might attract tourists, something which international politics have yet to accomplish. ;)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    48. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      I would, but I'm trying to make myself happy :)

      If I get my school debts paid off, I'll give you a ring..

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    49. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Why the hell are you interested in the Near East?

      The birthplace of civilization, how could you not be interested?

      You've got your own oil

      Nope. Not here.

      Besides, in addition to giving those people some sunlight, this stuff might attract tourists, something which international politics have yet to accomplish. ;)

      I can barely keep my eyes open during some of my city council meetings, I'm not spending my vacation watching the UN. ;)

    50. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      1.) Then... then make your own civilization and don't bother me with valid arguments!
      2.) Make your own oil as well!
      3.) See? Maybe installing a giant mirror might make those meetings more interesting. Especially if you put a giant lens in front of it.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    51. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Kind of like... don't move to Las Vegas if you want to drink water, or don't move to Minnesota if you don't like to freeze to death... We humans have been altering our personal environments for thousands of years.

    52. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Make your own oil as well!

      Fine, I'll make my own oil well, with hookers and blackjack... Forget the well and the blackjack! /futurama

    53. Re:If you can't stand the heat... by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      Do they use tax revenues to pay to air-condition Las Vegas?
      No, they ("they" being casino and hotel owners like Steve Wynn) use gambling losses. If you meant public spaces, "they" meaning government offices and such do use tax revenues collected from the casinos.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  7. Cool! by dbolger · · Score: 5, Funny

    During peacetime, it brings light to the people, but if war is declared - instant Archimedes Death Ray! :D

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. And if the mirror is curved... by djsmiley · · Score: 1

    Then WHooomp! no more city.

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  10. being an EU citizen by myc_lykaon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I cannot (well - I do believe) the EU is paying up for a scheme to redirect sunlight into a town that:

    a) was badly positioned in the first place;

    b) has existed as such for hundreds of years without blowing up, dying or otherwise falling off the edge of the planet without this winter sun;

    What about EU funds for my city - it's a bit chilly in winter. Has been for the last 5000 years. Everyone there knew it was chilly in winter and it hasn't blown up or fallen off the edge of the world because of this winter chill. I think the EU should pay for some weird underground heating to recompense us for this winter horror. Oh and a massive umbrella - it tends to rain a bit here.

    Other than that - 'tis a cool piece of tech.

    1. Re:being an EU citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind the fact that it's rather expensive to light and warm up a town for a whole winter. Could it be that this money will be well used for a simple solar-powered solution? I think this is a wonderful and genious solution, albeit a bit pricy for just a shiny plate...

    2. Re:being an EU citizen by rxmd · · Score: 3, Funny
      What about EU funds for my city - it's a bit chilly in winter. Has been for the last 5000 years. Everyone there knew it was chilly in winter and it hasn't blown up or fallen off the edge of the world because of this winter chill. I think the EU should pay for some weird underground heating to recompense us for this winter horror.
      Let me guess, you live in Helsinki? :)

      Well, the EU made Finland lower their taxes on alcohol... and since Estonia has joined the EU, the import tariffs on cheap Estonian vodka have fallen, too. ("Viru Valge" at 80%, anyone?) So the EU is actually doing something for the Finns and their cold winter nights ;)

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    3. Re:being an EU citizen by ChristW · · Score: 5, Insightful

      a) was badly positioned in the first place;

      It's excellently placed... All their crops get the most sunlight, and the village is quite cool in the summer...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:being an EU citizen by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      I agree with some of nthe sentiment of what you're saying, but there's quite a few arguments FOR this too. A town in darkness/shadow in the winter is likely to have a higher percentage of rather lethargic citizens, which probably doesn't do the economy much good. Whilst a lovely bit of fluffy snow does a lot of good for any economy (people get happy and spend money), the snow is, in most places, accompanied by sunlight, whereas if everything is just... dull and badly lit, it's not going to encourage it, especially if all summer they have had a blinding sun on their town.

      I think one of the other children of your posts put it about right that it is also a good way to save on heating and energy bills etc.

      It's a difficult choice and obviously not one they just jumped at. There are arguments to support the idea and it's not just a lazy pipe dream.

    5. Re:being an EU citizen by tcornelissen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The EU is not paying for that town. EU doesn't care for some people in some town. They are paying so that that company has something to do. EU does care for companies, or at least for companies that have enough money to lobby/bribe EU officials.

    6. Re:being an EU citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a wanker. Cities world wide are chilly; central heating and fireplaces solve this nicely. Cities that lose sunlight completely during a season while the rest of the countryside enjoys its many benefits (vitamins etc) are not.

    7. Re:being an EU citizen by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live exactly but where I live, in Birmingham, there are hundreds of buildings, parks, squares, bus stations, railway stations etc which have been built with EU funds which in total I am sure comes to way way more than the couple of million being spent here.

    8. Re:being an EU citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EUvitto! :

    9. Re:being an EU citizen by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Finns don't need Estonian vodka. We drink Koskenkorva here.

      Plus, buses stacked with old Russian ladies arrives every morning and they are selling the good Russian stuff on the black market for next to nothing (cigarettes, too).

      (totally OT, but someone might find it interesting..)

    10. Re:being an EU citizen by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Birmingham, eh?

      Perhaps you could apply for a grant to have a giant saltwater lake dug, complete with sandy beaches, to make up for the fact that you have to travel for at least two hours to reach the sea?

      Or have an air filtration system installed in the city centre -- draw in the traffic fumes around ground level, purify them with electrostatic precipitation and chemical scrubbing, inject a little oxygen if required, and blast out nearly-fresh air about head height. {Before you dismiss this as ridiculous, remember that 200 years ago they mocked the idea of treating sewage before dumping it in watercourses.}

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    11. Re:being an EU citizen by szo · · Score: 1

      ("Viru Valge" at 80%, anyone?)

      Yes please!

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
    12. Re:being an EU citizen by jc42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The EU should pay for some weird underground heating ...

      Actually, that's not at all weird. Here in the US, there are a number of universities that have done this. I attended two of them. In the winter, when visitors commented on the "waste" of heated sidewalks, it was fun to explain that it was a side effect of the cost-saving heating system.

      What they do is obvious: There's a big campus heating plant, with underground pipes connecting it to the other buildings. Mostly, the pipes are inside tunnels, which contain other long, skinny things like wiring of various sorts. And, for obvious reasons, the tunnels are usually built underneath sidewalks, so that the leaking heat will keep the walks clear in winter.

      The only problem is that they don't put them under all the sidewalks. But in general, such central heating systems cost a lot less than separate heating systems in each building.

      Too bad that people in towns generally can't implement something similar. But if they did, the cost would be called "taxes", and no matter how much less they were than per-house heating systems, people wouldn't accept them. Taxes are, you know, evil; paying twice as much to a private corporation is good.

      There is technology to do similar things with light. Google for "light pipe". How practical this might be on a town level isn't obvious.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    13. Re:being an EU citizen by infolib · · Score: 1
      In the winter, when visitors commented on the "waste" of heated sidewalks, it was fun to explain that it was a side effect of the cost-saving heating system.

      In Denmark, we isolate the pipes of our cost-saving heating systems.

      And we do implement them city-wide, pulling waste heat from the power plants.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    14. Re:being an EU citizen by Xarius · · Score: 1

      You mis-spelled 'US' several times there.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    15. Re:being an EU citizen by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      I believe your correction misspelled "government".

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    16. Re:being an EU citizen by dajak · · Score: 1

      I cannot (well - I do believe) the EU is paying up for a scheme to redirect sunlight into a town that:

      a) was badly positioned in the first place;

      b) has existed as such for hundreds of years without blowing up, dying or otherwise falling off the edge of the planet without this winter sun;

      What about EU funds for my city - it's a bit chilly in winter. Has been for the last 5000 years. Everyone there knew it was chilly in winter and it hasn't blown up or fallen off the edge of the world because of this winter chill. I think the EU should pay for some weird underground heating to recompense us for this winter horror. Oh and a massive umbrella - it tends to rain a bit here.

      Other than that - 'tis a cool piece of tech.


      I also live in one of those places that was 'badly positioned in the first place': below sea level in the Netherlands. Is the EU also going to pay the energy bills for the pump installations we use to pump out excess water? Even better: we would be really grateful if the EU lowered the sea level in the North Sea by about 7 meters.

    17. Re:being an EU citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he spelt it in French.

      (hint for Americans: in French, the United States are called 'États Unis')

  11. I'm Sure... by MattLiv · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that the mirror companies decision to pay for some of the cost will reflect well on them over time.

    1. Re:I'm Sure... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Well, one can only speculate. But I'm sure that this will do wonders for the town's image.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  12. Don't like it? Too bad by EtherealStrife · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "But the young folks are moving away."

    Seems like the younguns catch on quick. If you don't like living there, then don't. Problem solved. Seems like they're better off than all the folks near the arctic circle, but you don't see/hear them complaining...
    So once again the government/PTBs are footing the bill for people too lazy to move. *cough* New Orleans *cough* Florida *cough*

    Besides, a few "lawn sized" patches of light aren't going to make the place any less bleak during the winter months...it might blind some folks looking in the wrong direction, though. Or did I miss the part where they add in some kind of diffusing lens?

    The way things seem to be headed (based on TFA), just wait a few years. Give the old folks time to die off, and the younger group time to get fed up and leave. $2,400,000 saved.

    1. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      So once again the government/PTBs are footing the bill for people too lazy to move. *cough* New Orleans *cough* Florida *cough*

      The question you seem to miss in all these cases is how much does it cost everyone in terms of lost jobs, damage to the economy, etc to just move an entire city? (especially in the case of New Orleans). If it's more cost effective to rebuild, you do it. In this case if it's cheaper to put in a big mirror to bring in light, (and it actually works to get people to stay) you do it. The cost is only 2.4 million dollars, and the EU only pays half of that. With 440 people in the town that's about $2250 per person.

      The question you SHOULD be asking is is this an effective strategy (cost included) to stop stagnation and economic deday in a region and promote growth, vs just letting the city die (and puttting the money somwehere else)? It seems a bit crazy to me that a few lit up spots are going to make much difference, but then again I don't live in this town.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Besides, a few "lawn sized" patches of light aren't going to make the place any less bleak during the winter months...it might blind some folks looking in the wrong direction, though. Or did I miss the part where they add in some kind of diffusing lens?

      Do they use a diffusing lens to protect peoples' eyesight from direct sunlight? Why would one be required in this case? I ask this half-rhetorically... perhaps there's some strange effect present, like when looking at an eclipse.

      The way things seem to be headed (based on TFA), just wait a few years. Give the old folks time to die off, and the younger group time to get fed up and leave. $2,400,000 saved.

      And an entire town to convert into the world's largest rave area. Those mirrors would still come in handy, though.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you missed the part where it says: don't look at the sun either.

    4. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by hhghghghh · · Score: 1

      So once again the government/PTBs are footing the bill for people too lazy to move. *cough* New Orleans *cough* Florida *cough*

      The question you seem to miss in all these cases is how much does it cost everyone in terms of lost jobs, damage to the economy, etc to just move an entire city? (especially in the case of New Orleans). If it's more cost effective to rebuild, you do it. In this case if it's cheaper to put in a big mirror to bring in light, (and it actually works to get people to stay) you do it. The cost is only 2.4 million dollars, and the EU only pays half of that. With 440 people in the town that's about $2250 per person.


      Yes.. Yes, you see, New Orleans, a huge city with a populace of millions, being devastated by a storm has the exact same economical impact as BumFuck Austria with 440 people gets from young folk moving out.. At "only" $2250 per capita, why don't they just increase the town's taxes, rather than paying it out of the EU's (i.e. my) pocket? Or if the EU has to fit the bill, just pay them a $2250 bonus to move the fuck out of that town and let it die. Problem solved for ever, rather than some weird patchy spots of light added (what, they don't have light bulbs in Austria?) in the theory that this will transform the town in a hot place to be for young people.

      Of course, creating jobs (in actual productive, non-bullshit industries, quite unlike the "giant mirror to warm up towns that have been in a crappy place since time eternal and never complained before" industry), or even just improving the infrastructure is right out.

    5. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Seems like the younguns catch on quick. If you don't like living there, then don't. Problem solved. Seems like they're better off than all the folks near the arctic circle, but you don't see/hear them complaining...

      You obviously don't talk to people living near the Arctic circle much... Norway for instance have far more people living in areas where the sun never rises during the winter than this, and you'll always hear some of them complaining. More importantly, it affects productivity - that alone means a project like this would probably pay for itself in terms of increased taxes by boosting productivity alone.

      It also have significant economic impact in terms of higher rates of depression and associated problems, higher rates of sick leave etc. You can see that problem to varying degree much further south in Norway too (that is, areas that DO get sunlight during the winter)

      So once again the government/PTBs are footing the bill for people too lazy to move. *cough* New Orleans *cough* Florida *cough*

      The difference being that in this case people aren't in any danger if they stay, and there's a well established town with historic roots and established businesses that aren't facing any forms of disruption, and the only problem can be alleviated at a cost to the EU of $3000 per inhabitant - a cost far below what the average citizen pay in taxes in a single year.

      Quite likely the cost of these people moving in to larger towns with pressures on housing, schools, hospitals etc. would cost society far more than a measly $3000 per person.

      Another issue is to what extent these people can affort to move - presumably their properties are going to go at an extremely low price.

      It's extremely short sighted not to consider other costs than the immediately visible costs of a project.

    6. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by killjoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since you brought New Orleans into this allow me to veer offtopic a bit.

      I am a middle class guy. If I heard that a hurricane was coming my way I would lock up my house, get in my car and go to some higher ground and stay in a hotel for a week or so. While I am gone I would have a high degree of confidence that my house won't be broken into and my stuff stolen. Even if it (or if the hurricane destroyed my house) I would still be OK. I have insurance, I have money in the bank to sustain myself for a while, I have a good job, I have credit cards. I would be OK while I am waiting for the insurance process to sort itself out.

      Compare my situation to that of a poor person in NO. They don't have decent jobs, they don't have credit, they don't have money saved up. Everything they own is in their house. Everything. Nothing in the bank, nothing in a 401K. No insurance. When you leave your house you leave everything you own behind. Being in a poor part the town you also have a very high risk of getting everything you own get stolen or destroyed by the storm.

      It sucks to be poor. If you don't have a car, don't have money to stay in a hotel for a week waiting for the storm to pass you are not going to risk hitching a ride or taking a bus and losing everything you have. It's just too much of a risk.

      So before you decide that everybody in New Orleans is too lazy to move take a moment to think about their condition.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    7. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by leenusohleenus · · Score: 1

      Seems like they're better off than all the folks near the arctic circle, but you don't see/hear them complaining... Funny thing, I don't see/hear ANYTHING BUT them (us) complaining. Come closer and every year you'll hear people go: "What? Autumn? AGAIN!?"

    8. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by vidarh · · Score: 1
      The total economic impact isn't relevant. What matters is the cost/benefit of investing in rebuilding or improvement vs. resettling people.

      The likely cost to society of resettling 440 people is far above $2250 per person in lost taxes, unemployment benefits to those that are unable to find new jobs, pressure on the nearby housing market etc. As such, it would likely cost YOU more in taxes if these people were resettled, and it might very well cost society as a whole more in taxes if these people voluntarily move as well, in terms of lost employment and other social costs.

      Besides, assuming 300 million people in work paying taxes in the EU (a low estimate), the cost is 0.4 Euro cents per tax payer. I'll happily pay your share if you stop spouting nonsense like what you wrote.

      And if people are willing to pay for mirrors like these it isn't a "bullshit industry" any more than anything else people are willing to pay for. At a cost of $1.2m for the EU, the company in question won't have to pull in much extra business before they alone have repaid the full cost in increased taxes without even taking things like reduced sick leave and higher productivity in Rattenberg into account.

    9. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by magicchex · · Score: 1

      Too "lazy" to move?

      I'm assuming you would want everyone in a "problem" area to stop being lazy and just move. Where would the funds come for the move? From selling their home in the "problem" area? But wouldn't the fact that everyone was moving away lower the value of their property?

      I'm just curious how all these people can afford to move away without support from the government or charities?

      Or maybe it's their fault they're poor?

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    10. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Do they use a diffusing lens to protect peoples' eyesight from direct sunlight?

      The difference is that the sun itself is (usually) enough high up in the sky that people don't look into it accidentally, whereas these mirrors sit on a mountainside.

      Moreover, the sun will only be visible in these mirrors if you are in one of the "bright spots". So, it may surprise you when driving/walking around, and entering one of these spots, while your eyes are still adjusted to the half-darkness that's everywhere else around.

      I ask this half-rhetorically... perhaps there's some strange effect present, like when looking at an eclipse.

      The issue with eclipses is that the brightness per area (which causes damage) of the still visible patches of the sun is the same as normal, whereas the overall brightness (which triggers protective reflexes, such as the blink reflex and the shrinking of pupil) is much less.

      These won't be probably an issue with these mirrors unless they used convex mirrors...

    11. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "More importantly, it affects productivity - that alone means a project like this would probably pay for itself in terms of increased taxes by boosting productivity alone."

      Well great, then they can pay for it themselves or get a loan since it's going to pay for itself so quickly from their increased productivity.

    12. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by flood6 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I wouldn't pay to resettle any of them. If they want to move, then it's on their nickel.

      Besides, assuming 300 million people in work paying taxes in the EU (a low estimate), the cost is 0.4 Euro cents per tax payer. I'll happily pay your share if you stop spouting nonsense like what you wrote.

      I'm not European, so this specific issue doesn't effect me, but you're still talking about $1.2 million. Sure your share of that is jack squat, but that $1.2 million being spent to feed the hungry, fight crime, save the whales, insert-your-pet-issue-here will go a long way. Wouldn't you rather it be spent where you want or at least someplace more reasonable than "fixing" a town that has been "broke" since the first brick was laid?

      Just because each taxpayer doesn't have to pay that much individually, there still seems like better places to spend the money.

      This is not an attempt to argue, I have just never understood the logic behind the contention that it's OK to blow tax dollars on crackpot schemes because it only personally cost me $0.0004.

    13. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      How much extra business do you think they'll pull in? This is the kind of project that's only worthwhile if you have a lot of someone else's money to spend. This is just a transfer of money from EU taxpayers in general to the shareholders of a (probably well connected) company.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    14. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lemme guess - you don't own a home? Don't live in the same area your parents, their parents, and their parents lived? Don't have any sense of community or history where you reside? If any of the above are true, then let me ask you this: what the fuck are you smoking, and may I please have some?

      It's not as simple as "Hey, you don't like it? Move!" You're basically suggesting that people give up their history and property in order to spare ~$3,000 of THEIR OWN money per person (taxes) trying to fix a problem.

      I find it really ironic that a comment modified as "insightful" suggests that, rather than spending a trivial sum, they should just let a community with roots fade into nothing.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    15. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by quigonn · · Score: 1

      Why should they move anyway? Moving those people is such a crackpot idea. Hey, Austria is structured that way! A few big cities (still small compared to international cities), and most of the towns are located in valleys, with mountains around them, and they were built 700 or more years ago (my home town has roots 2000 years back).

      Slashdotters, Austria is not the USA. Austria is small, and many things rely on how it is currently structured. Relocating people would be just cruel and inhumane, and the bigger cities would be overstrained by all the people moving.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    16. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by magicchex · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    17. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Seems like they're better off than all the folks near the arctic circle, but you don't see/hear them complaining...

      That's because you never call!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    18. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It sucks to be poor.

      It's supposed to suck. If it didn't suck, then there'd be no motivation to get off their lazy asses and get jobs, training, or schooling.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    19. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      That's pretty shallow, don't you think?

      Let's say you were born, and grew up in this town. Your parents have died off, so you have the house. Nobody really wants to move into this dark town, so your property is not very valuable (financially). You can't sell your home. All the people around you have been your friends since you were a small child. You know everyone. Now, would it be fair to try and improve the town, or should everyone just close their doors, travel to a new city, try to find a new job, and start all over again by trying to afford a new property. Ofcourse, the nearest city might not be able to afford an influx of several thousand new jobs anyway.

      It's not laziness, moron. Hey, I'm up in Canada, and I don't like the cold any more (after 23yrs). I want to move to the same style of place I have now, only in Southern California. Its just a quick plane ride, I'm not too lazy. Too bad that instead of $300/mo for rent, it will now be $2000. Food, travel, taxes, etc will be through the roof, my friends and family will be thousands of miles away, etc. Laziness has nothing to do with it. Perhaps your from a large city, and that's why you don't understand.

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    20. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1
      It's not as simple as "Hey, you don't like it? Move!" You're basically suggesting that people give up their history and property in order to spare ~$3,000 of THEIR OWN money per person (taxes) trying to fix a problem.

      Actually, if they want to spend $3,000 of their own money on the project, I don't think anyone here would object to that. However, what they're really doing is spending ~$1.2e6 of their community' money, taken by force from their neighbours through taxation. Those who want to give $3,000 to the project can do so of their own free will; they have no right to force those opposed to the project to cover the costs.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    21. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Firstly the people pay taxes, which go in part to the EU. This in turn is funnelled back into the infrastructure, etc of countries. France in particular benefits, especially from the CAP (common agricultural policy) and the 1.2 million invested in this sceme will do much more good than paying farmers not to grow things. Firstly theres the cyclical nature of the investment, the workers setting the project up will go to the town to spend part of their wages on food, drink, etc. Secondly those workers will pay tax on their income, which in Austria is fairly high, meaning that around half the money will go back to the govenment, and part of that in turn to the EU. All that is being done is the money is being locked away for some time, not wasted entirely. On top of that the extra sunlight will aid people in their Vitamin A production which in long winter darkness in the shadow of a mountain could be severely deficient, this could in turn lower healthcare costs (Austria has a brilliant national healthcare system. And on top of that its promoting people to stay out of cities, which is beneficial in my view.

      Id much rather the money goes to funding projects like this which would rely on funding Europes manufacturing infrastructure rather than on farming/not using land subsidies. Large mirrors can be of great use, and if cost of production drops it makes solar power much more viable. Focusing light to heat water can be much more efficient than using solar panels, which are a) produced abroad and b) cost substantially more.

      I know that there are better uses for the money, but as far as EU money being spent goes, this is much more beneficial to EU citizens than to politicians than the usual projects.

    22. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they said about Atlantis.

    23. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I wouldn't pay to resettle any of them. If they want to move, then it's on their nickel.

      So you can guarantee that each and every of them will get a job at wherever they move to? And that they will not need any place to stay so that they don't drive up the housing prices in the new location? We' not talking subsidy, we're talking associated costs. You have to account for people not finding jobs at the new location, housing prices going up, maybe even a few businesses shutting down because there's not enough customers anymore.


      Wouldn't you rather it be spent where you want or at least someplace more reasonable than "fixing" a town that has been "broke" since the first brick was laid?

      Chances are that when the town was founded there were some good arguments in favor of it, like access to a river, good soil etc. Considering that this is Austria and not the USA I'd assume that the town in question is old enough to have been built at a time when good soil was much more important than access to sunlight during winter (when most people didn't leave the house much anyway).

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    24. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      at a cost to the EU of $3000 per inhabitant - a cost far below what the average citizen pay in taxes in a single year.

      So they don't use that tax money for other stuff? You make it sound like they're not getting anything for their tax money, so they deserve it.

      That said, I'm not against it if that's what the citizens of the town really want to spend the money on...every place has funds that are just for keeping the people happy (think parks & recreation money). Having worked in darkend computer labs (not allowed to turn up the lighting cuz it bothers the operators) for many years, I can sympathize when people talk about lost productivity. It just makes me want to go to sleep.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    25. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those who want to give $3,000 to the project can do so of their own free will; they have no right to force those opposed to the project to cover the costs.

      ...and if payment is voluntary, that also solves the tricky question of where to place the few hotspots, hehe.


    26. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Those who want to give $3,000 to the project can do so of their own free will; they have no right to force those opposed to the project to cover the costs.

      They have every right - just as much right as any other group does, at least, to try and get tax money for various projects. If those neighbors don't like the fact that they won't always get their way when deciding where tax money goes, they can leave the EU and never have to worry about their neighbors spending their money in a way that they disagree with.

      After all, given the "Hey, if you don't like it, just leave rather than try to fix it" logic people are trying to use here, walking away is a great solution to all life's problems, right? Hey, let's take it further:

      Let's abandon Vienna, rather than pay upkeep on the canal system. Let's evacuate Amsterdam, cause paying for all those dikes is just pointlessly expensive! Hey, all you people living in places that require any kind of enviornmental adaptation: MOVE! Let's all just live in one big huge megacity - that'd solve all our problems.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    27. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by NardofDoom · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      So nobody should live anywhere that has a remote possiblity of anything ever going wrong. And if something does go wrong, well, then it's their fault, right? I mean, they shouldn't have lived there. Just like those damn poor people. If they have such a problem with not having enough to eat, they should have been born to rich parents just like the rest of us.

      /sarcasm

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    28. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of smoking anything. In the U.S. (at least in my experience), all of the college-bound students try to create at least some distance between themselves and their parents, usually on the order of a three-hour drive at least. Many just move across the country.

      Just because your morality has such a strong sense of community (which I could easily rephrase in more disparaging terms---try, perhaps, "tying down young people to the same backward lives as their parents"), that doesn't mean it should be the one to receive government funding. Lemme repeat: it is not the government's job to enforce your morality.

      Furthermore, as the EU is paying, I'm pretty sure that it's everyone in the EU's money, not just "THEIR OWN" money. Now I don't know about you, but if I lived in, e.g., France, I'd be pissed that these random guys were getting some of my money to install a mirror to create "hot spots" around their town. (Of course, if I lived in France, I'd be pissed for a lot of reasons... but that's another topic). But IANAEUTL (EU tax lawyer).

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    29. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by khallow · · Score: 1
      They have every right - just as much right as any other group does, at least, to try and get tax money for various projects. If those neighbors don't like the fact that they won't always get their way when deciding where tax money goes, they can leave the EU and never have to worry about their neighbors spending their money in a way that they disagree with.

      What gives them the "right" to spend someone else's money?

      Let's abandon Vienna, rather than pay upkeep on the canal system. Let's evacuate Amsterdam, cause paying for all those dikes is just pointlessly expensive! Hey, all you people living in places that require any kind of enviornmental adaptation: MOVE! Let's all just live in one big huge megacity - that'd solve all our problems.

      Vienna and Amsterdam can pay for their own upkeep. What's the problem here is using public funds of a large group for the benefit of a few. If a city or group can't afford the environmental modification they want, then they should either adapt or move. It is that simple.

    30. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by dajak · · Score: 1

      The total economic impact isn't relevant. What matters is the cost/benefit of investing in rebuilding or improvement vs. resettling people.

      There is also a more general cost to society as a whole for letting parts of the countryside die, while other areas of the country get too crowded. These mountain areas are attractive for tourists as long as there are people there to keep the place habitable. No permanent inhabitants = no services, no shops, and low real estate value because of burglars, bears, and wolves.

    31. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by rawg · · Score: 1

      I believe that most, not all, poor people are poor by choice. Even when I didn't have any money at all, I still was able to move to somewhere that I could make some money. The difference between me and them must be that I have greater will power. I remember begging for money on the street so that I could move to another town to get a job. I remember staying at friends houses until I was able to get a job and a place of my own. I guess the thing I really had going for me is that I've never been to jail and never did drugs.

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    32. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      What gives them the "right" to spend someone else's money?

      They're part of the EU.

      When various nations joined the EU, one of the things that was certainly part of the deal is that the union might spend some of their money in ways that might not directly benefit them.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    33. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by flood6 · · Score: 1
      So you can guarantee that each and every of them will get a job at wherever they move to?
      What I meant in that first sentence you quoted was that I don't think they should be encouraged to leave, paid to leave, or sent on some trail of tears style forced exodus from their beloved cold dark town. Rather I just meant that the current situation is fine. I don't see this issue as needing any public money spent on it; not a mirror, not a relocation. So the gradual vacating of their town won't have a significant effect on the surrounding economies.

      The article says the town was built there in the 1300s to fend off invaders. I'm sure it was great for that, but now that a smart-bomb can take you out through an outhose window, I think I'd rather have some sunshine in the winter.

    34. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a matter of smoking anything. In the U.S. (at least in my experience), all of the college-bound students try to create at least some distance between themselves and their parents, usually on the order of a three-hour drive at least. Many just move across the country.

      What relevance does this have to the topic at hand? I certainly won't debate that many people in the US choose to move away from their families when they go to college. I also wouldn't debate that many people prefer the taste of a flame broiled Whopper to a Big Mac. But so what?

      Just because your morality has such a strong sense of community (which I could easily rephrase in more disparaging terms---try, perhaps, "tying down young people to the same backward lives as their parents"), that doesn't mean it should be the one to receive government funding. Lemme repeat: it is not the government's job to enforce your morality.

      I could give a fuck if the young people move or stay. What I am talking about is people saying "You don't like where you live? Then move! Give up your property and your history and move!" and how that attitude is missing a rather large point.

      That point being this:

      3,000 people would be abandoning their land and homes if they "just moved." Who would buy thier land and homes? Nobody. So now you have 3,000 people in the EU who have given up the vast majority of their assets. Do you seriously think that economic fallout from 3,000 people suddenly being broke is going to be less, long term, than $1.2 million bucks? I daresay I'd be surprised if such a move didn't actually result in more expenditures on the part of other EU members than the mirror plan.

      So even "just" economically, "move!" is a stupid idea.

      Now add in the loss of history and community, and it becomes even dumber.

      Furthermore, as the EU is paying, I'm pretty sure that it's everyone in the EU's money, not just "THEIR OWN" money. Now I don't know about you, but if I lived in, e.g., France, I'd be pissed that these random guys were getting some of my money to install a mirror to create "hot spots" around their town. (Of course, if I lived in France, I'd be pissed for a lot of reasons... but that's another topic). But IANAEUTL (EU tax lawyer).

      Population of the EU: 457,030,418
      Cost, per citizen of the EU, of this project: .002735 euros (or dollars, or whatever the unit in discussion is)

      Are you seriously suggesting that 2.735 thousandths of a dollar/euro/whatever per citizen is some kind of major expenditure? You do realize that the amount in question is likely flushed down the toilet hourly through random administrative seepage? Some clerk in Belgium gives his wang an extra shake while at the john and boom - 2.735 thousandths of a dollar/euro/whatever just got spent.

      Given the choice between subsiding some beaurocrat rubbing one out during a coffee break or having a place I could visit that has ginormous mirrors, I'll take the mirrors.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    35. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      The issue with eclipses is that the brightness per area (which causes damage) of the still visible patches of the sun is the same as normal, whereas the overall brightness (which triggers protective reflexes, such as the blink reflex and the shrinking of pupil) is much less.

      These won't be probably an issue with these mirrors unless they used convex mirrors...

      Don't you mean "concave" mirrors?

    36. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      It's probably been much easier for you to avoid drugs and incarceration because you weren't born into a community and forced into a public school system where almost literally everyone around you, including your role models, were in and out of jail or addicted to drugs. In such conditions, you come to believe this is the norm, and this sort of situational, self-perpetuating poverty is hardly "by choice." Don't get me wrong, I'm all for personal responsibility--but this is a concept that only exists within context.

    37. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Why that town and not all of the others? Don't they pay taxes too?

      Hey, all you people living in places that require any kind of enviornmental adaptation: MOVE!

      If it's a choice between that and using politics to steal from others, that's what should happen. In this case there's a third option: the ones who get the benefits can be the ones that pay. Is that such an awful idea? We're not talking about poor people that can't afford to contribute.

    38. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Don't you mean "concave" mirrors?

      Hmmm, yes.

      These fancy mirrors are too easy to mix up :-(

    39. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, historical roots are a reason to stay for some people. By the way, the money also helps to create something pretty unique - I'd actually go there and look at it if I didn't live in northern Germany (and cool as that stuff is, it doesn't justify a multi-hundred-kilometer trip). This might actually turn the town into a point of interest for tourists.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    40. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by EtherealStrife · · Score: 1
      You obviously don't talk to people living near the Arctic circle much

      Yea all those months I spent in Nome, Alaska were just uh...in a hole. :) They don't even have road access to their town (vehicles have to be barged in from anchorage), so I figured if anyone would be peeved it'd be them.

      It's extremely short sighted not to consider other costs than the immediately visible costs of a project.

      it's extremely short sighted of you to not read to the end of my comment. :P My suggestion was a gradual depletion of the town's population, not moving overnight. To suggest such is ludicrous. I suggested that as the elderly die off and the younger ones slowly leave out of boredom/dream-seeking/whatever the town will be dead soon enough that such an expenditure would be ridiculously expensive (per capita).
      And I'm doubtful that a few "lawn sized" patches of light will instantly and permanently +1 morale the entire town. Initially it'll cause some stir, as all new things do, but after a few months they'll rate alongside the water fountains...
      ...at which point the town is back to square one.

    41. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by rixkix · · Score: 1

      Personal responsibility exists whether or not 'everyone' around you is making bad choices. A person chooses his or her role models. If that person chooses a role model that does drugs and is constantly in and out of jail and follows that model, it's hardly suprising if that person ends up doing many of the same things. Choose and follow a role model that doesn't lead down a path of self-destruction, if that's what you need. People make their choices and live with the consequences. Even if you have made bad choices in life, what's wrong with deciding to make good ones?

    42. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Let's abandon Vienna, rather than pay upkeep on the canal system. Let's evacuate Amsterdam, cause paying for all those dikes is just pointlessly expensive! Hey, all you people living in places that require any kind of enviornmental adaptation: MOVE!

      Yeah; we've heard a lot of that sort of attitude about New Orleans here in the US. Meanwhile, others have pointed out that New Orleans will be rebuilt, with stronger dikes, for the same reason that Amsterdam was rebuilt when the same sort of disaster happened there half a century ago.

      It turns out that Amsterdam and New Orleans exist where they are for the same strong economic reason. They are both near the mouth of a major river system with lots of traffic. It doesn't work to use a single type of ship for river and ocean shipping; you need a seaport near or in the estuary for transfer of goods between the two kinds of ships. And since that's where you do the transfer, you also build lots of warehouses there. Otherwise your commerce doesn't work. Right now there are a lot of economic problems in the middle of the US because so much shipping via the Mississippi has been crippled.

      And, of course, you don't build dikes or levees on a retail, private basis. If you do, a single negligent owner of 100 meters of shoreline will cause what just happened in New Orleans. River-mouth seaports need protection from storms, and that protection must be done on an area-wide basis; i.e., as a government project.

      Some Americans are figuring this out, as the Dutch did 50 years ago.

      The really annoying part is that the Army Corps of Engineers provided a detailed summary well before the storm hit. New Orleans' 17th-Street levee that was the biggest break was the item at the top of their list of recommended maintenance projects. The reaction of the Bush Administration was to cut almost all the funding. But this has been thoroughly documented and widely published, and lots of people consider Bush's people directly responsible for the resulting disaster. They were warned in clear engineering reports, and they chose to cut the maintenance.

      We'll see whether this causes any changes in the US, as it did in the Netherlands 50 years ago. Chances it won't produce changes in the crowd that calls itself "conservative" these days. But much of the population is getting the idea that maybe these aren't the sorts that you want to put in charge of critical infrastructure. We'll see what future elections bring.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    43. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      I'm not European, so this specific issue doesn't effect me, but you're still talking about $1.2 million. Sure your share of that is jack squat, but that $1.2 million being spent to feed the hungry, fight crime, save the whales, insert-your-pet-issue-here will go a long way.

      Not really. 1.2 million dollars just isn't the fortune you're making it out to be when you're talking about the big problems you referred to. Sure it might make a difference for a year or a few months, but what after that? If this thing works, it's a much more permanent solution and a solution for other towns with similar problems.


      This is not an attempt to argue, I have just never understood the logic behind the contention that it's OK to blow tax dollars on crackpot schemes because it only personally cost me $0.0004.

      I think that's a valid concern. It sure sounds like a nutty idea, but there's nothing to say it won't work. It's not as if the government is funding truly nutty ideas like perpetual motion machines or extracting zero-point energy.

      --
      AccountKiller
    44. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but your wrong. Every single person I knew while growing up was on drugs. Even my mother. I have memories of large trash bags of weed at home. While in high school I was a punk rocker and a skateboarder. A lot of my friends were in jail for stupidity. Why I didn't fall victim to this is because I'm not a victim. I am able to make up my own mind. I am not weak.

    45. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by khallow · · Score: 1
      When various nations joined the EU, one of the things that was certainly part of the deal is that the union might spend some of their money in ways that might not directly benefit them.

      Still, who has been given the "right" to spend that money? My complaint here is that nobody has such a right. Especially when it comes to paying for costs and risks from a choice. If you voluntarily live in a certain location, you should accept any risks or costs of that location not pay for them with public funds. The US (where I live) has an extreme example of this in coastal development.

    46. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Still, who has been given the "right" to spend that money? My complaint here is that nobody has such a right.

      By joining the EU, they gave permission to have their money spent for them. I don't know how much clearer I can make that statement. By joining the EU they gave the right to other people how some of their money is spent. By being part of a larger whole, and getting the privilleges and advantages of such, they also take on the responsibilities and disadvantages involved.

      Especially when it comes to paying for costs and risks from a choice.

      Right. They made a choice to join the EU. One of the costs and risks of that was that sometimes their money would be spent in ways that don't directly benefit them.

      If you voluntarily live in a certain location, you should accept any risks or costs of that location not pay for them with public funds. The US (where I live) has an extreme example of this in coastal development.

      This is not, in fact, how things actually work in the US. Millions of dollars get spent on crazy shit here all the time - bridges in Alaska that connect two barely habitable islands, for example. Subsidizing farmers to *not* grow crops.

      There is also a benefit to diverse living arrangements. If people didn't live on the coasts - in other words, if they weren't subsidized to do so in various ways - we'd have more crowding in areas that are, without subsidies, much better places to live.

      You seem to be advocating some sort of "everyone for themselves" thing. Which sounds great in theory, but in practice tends to not end up well - old people eating cat-food, that sort of thing.

      Some people call me a socialist, as if that's a bad thing.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    47. Re:Don't like it? Too bad by khallow · · Score: 1
      Right. They made a choice to join the EU. One of the costs and risks of that was that sometimes their money would be spent in ways that don't directly benefit them.

      You completely miss my point. Just because I agree to join the EU and pay them funds, doesn't mean that I suddenly get a "right" to spend EU funds on personal benefits.

      You seem to be advocating some sort of "everyone for themselves" thing. Which sounds great in theory, but in practice tends to not end up well - old people eating cat-food, that sort of thing.

      So building a mirror, that frankly that town could build itself *if* it wanted to, is going to save old people from eating catfood?

      For me, the ultimate problem with society can be summed up with three words "Other Peoples' Money". Too many institutions, businesses, and governments are making irresponsible or risky decisions and paying for them with other peoples' money. For me, the ultimate dilemma of socialism is this question, "Why do you give so much power and money to an entity which you clearly don't trust?"

  13. Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A while ago there was some research into giant tinfoil equipped satellites which could redirect sunlight onto the earth during darkness. Applications included agricultural (think world's biggest hydroponic setup) and emergency situations requiring 24hr illumination.

    I don't know what happened, however between this and Solar Power Satellites transmitting solar generated electricity to earth via microwave I wonder if the research has hurricane implications.

    That is, if they could construct an enormous sun-reflecting hurricane death-ray which could be projected/reflected into the eyes of hurricanes, or over oceans to heat the air/water before Hurricanes can form.

    Playing with weather... Won't that annoy the hippies!

    --

    Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    1. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...over oceans to heat the air/water before Hurricanes can form."

      Hurricanes form over heated water.

    2. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 1

      Umm... Good point and I stand corrected.

      Erm... What I meant to say umm... is do eomething or other with the sun to prevent a hurricane, besides heating water... Ummm...Yeah!

      Sorry for any confusion.

      --

      Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    3. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      Playing with weather... Won't that annoy the hippies!
      Simple: direct a tornado over to where they protest. Or a miniature, very short lasting, local ice age. Half an hour of -90C tends to cool off most protesters.
    4. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by krajo · · Score: 1

      There are several problems with trying to stop hurricanes, see section C5 of the NOAA Hurricane FAQ: http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/tcfaqHED.html

      --
      Learn to separate truth from illusion. Because in this world, it's the hardest thing to do.
    5. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by vidarh · · Score: 1

      You might be thinking about this. It was launched I believe, but the mirror supposedly never folded out, and so the project was abandoned.

    6. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Your zeal to irritate hippies shortcircuited your brains again huh? Seems like you suffer from a lot of short circuits in your thinking.

      "Those damned hippies, if it wasn't for them we could play with the weather without impugnity!. They are the only things standing between us and a world without hurricanes!"

      --
      evil is as evil does
    7. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "A while ago there was some research into giant tinfoil equipped satellites which could redirect sunlight onto the earth during darkness."

      Indeed. Here's one plan that would only have cost a couple of billion dollars a time:

      http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.g ov/19790076663_1979076663.pdf

      Actually makes this EU boondoggle look cheap!

    8. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 2, Funny
      Your zeal to irritate hippies shortcircuited your brains again huh?

      Nah... The lack of hurricanes in my neighbourhood just lowered my thirst for knowledge of how to defeat them.

      I already know how to defeat hippies...

      --

      Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    9. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Actuator+Man · · Score: 1
      Playing with weather... Won't that annoy the hippies!
      Yeah, you're right. That's why the US army throws white phosphorus on Iraqi civilians to "illuminate the battlefield".
    10. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      A while ago there was some research into giant tinfoil equipped satellites which could redirect sunlight onto the earth during darkness.

      I'm convinced that we'll see, in the next 20 years, a project to do just that with the purpose of raising temperatures in the northern latitudes during winter.

      There is simply too much money and too many people in the northeastern US (Chicago east to New England down to DC) for it not to occur. I don't think they would try to raise Cleveland to 70 degrees in January but I could see stabilizing temperatures at 50 degrees year round. (At least during day...night temperatures would be just as cold as they are now.)

      There are some major environmental bonuses--it's a form of renewable energy on a massive scale--and there would be major cost savings due to less energy usage to keep homes/businesses warm.

    11. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is one of the stupidest fucking things I've heard in quite a long time.

    12. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      A while ago there was some research into giant tinfoil equipped satellites which could redirect sunlight onto the earth during darkness. Applications included agricultural (think world's biggest hydroponic setup) and emergency situations requiring 24hr illumination.

      I don't know what happened, however between this and Solar Power Satellites transmitting solar generated electricity to earth via microwave I wonder if the research has hurricane implications.

      You know, putting those two together brings up an interesting idea. One of the big negatives of a Solar power satellite beaming power back to earth via microwave is what happens if the beam gets off course. (All of us who've played Sim City know this can be disastrous.) But, suppose we just combine those two ideas and put the photovoltaics on the ground somewhere, then reflect light on them via satellite. Yes, you have to worry about clouds and such, but it does have a few advantages.

      First of all, the dangerous beam of microwave is eliminated. You are reflecting sunlight at the Earth, but doubling the amount of sunlight we already have is just about the worst case, and that doesn't seem too disastrous. Second, the satellites are much simpler and lighter and cheaper and reliable, since all they have to do is passively reflect sunlight onto Earth rather than collecting it, converting it, and transmitting it as microwaves. And third, if the solar cells are on the ground, they will receive light naturally for a good part of the day, and while they are getting natural light, the satellite can service a solar cell farm on the opposite side of the Earth where it's dark. Then 12 hours later, that solar cell farm is in natural light, and the satellite switches to the one that's now in darkness.

    13. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by killjoe · · Score: 1

      It seems your brain suffers from lots of zealotry shortcuts.

      I was just looking at your blog for example. You have a couple of pictures of young people playing voleyball there and you are somehow convinced that this means indymedia is full of shit. To you these pictures meaningful enough to put on your web page and proves that everything any hippie says is wrong and that indymedia is evil. To me it's just a picture of young people playing voleyball. The weird thing is that neither one of the young guys looks all that different then the young people in my town or any other town.

      Zealots suffer from severe brain shortcircuitry. It's amusing to watch sometimes how they react to ordinary things or things that they consider outside of the norm. Watching you react to hippies (or people you think are hippies even though they don't look anything like hippies) is kind of like watching a religous zealot react to a gay person or a white supremacist reacting to a jew or a african american.

      It's amazing what kinds of conclusions you guys draw from ordinary behavior.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    14. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 1

      The post you are referring to was written with tongue firmly in cheek. As was my previous comment. You seem quite reactionary yourself.

      May I respectfully suggest you read some of the the rest of the blog for far more indisputable examples of what you have apparently dismissed (i.e. Indymedia being "full of shit"). You may be surprised/disturbed by what you see.

      --

      Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    15. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by smithmc · · Score: 1

        I'm convinced that we'll see, in the next 20 years, a project to do just that with the purpose of raising temperatures in the northern latitudes during winter.

      Yep, I'm pretty sure we're going to see rising temperatures in the northern latitudes, too - only it's going to be all year round, not just the northern latitudes, and not because of any special project.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    16. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I don't really need to read any further then I did. Whether indymedia is full of shit or not is besides the point. The point is that you are willing to draw conclusions from irrelevent facts. You dismiss points of view based on what a person looks like not the content of their words. I would not trust any conclusion you have reached about any subject. Note that I have based this opinion purely on what you have communicated to me. I have no idea what you look like nor do I know what you smell like or the last time you bathed with soap. Those things after all are completely irrelevent to what you are saying.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    17. Re:Sun reflecting mirrors in space by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight...

      You say I am: willing to draw conclusions from irrelevent facts yet preface this by saying you don't need to read any relevant material further than a single tongue-in-cheek post on a very content rich blog?

      Pot, kettle, black. Sorry.

      As for your accusation that I "dismiss points of view based on what a person looks like not the content of their words" you are unbelievably mistaken. You don't know me, and the fallacy of your argument is amply demonstrated by the bulk of my content you have chosen to ignore. I daresay you don't have much of a sense of humour either. Of course I could be mistaken. Has anyone else ever told you that?

      As for whether Indymedia is full of shit or not being besides the point, it is in fact the whole point of my blog. That you choose to ignore it and jump to a (wrong) conclusion is your problem, however I note it was your choice to visit the site. I doubt you'll be back and that is probably a shame.

      --

      Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

  14. Re:Shadows... by blackomegax · · Score: 1, Funny

    the puppetiers better be prepared for massive sunburn, then.

  15. 10 Minute Walk? Hah! by core+plexus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The nation's northernmost town braces Friday for its last sundown of the year.

    Barrow, Alaska residents say they tend to sleep more during the long months of round-the-clock dark. The sun sets in Barrow on Friday at 1:40 p.m. and doesn't rise again until Jan. 23 at 1:01 p.m.

    Diana Martin is an Inupiat Eskimo and a lifelong Barrow resident. She says it's much easier to start the day when Barrow receives round-the-clock daylight in summer.

  16. new news! by Celt · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was on the BBC News website two weeks ago, in fairness atleast can we see the news when it happens

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:new news! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      When you saw it on the BBC news site two weeks ago, I presume you submitted it?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. Vampires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the townspeople vampires?

  18. Re:Australia by shrewd · · Score: 4, Funny

    the Austrian variety of kangaroo's live deep deep underground in dark cold caverns, they'll be alright.

  19. Any pic? by earthstar · · Score: 1

    Any pic of the mountain & town.?

    1. Re:Any pic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Any pic? by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 0

      You'd need a pretty big flash.

  20. Not the brightest idea by Greg+Hullender · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The EU wants to spend millions of dollars to light up a few percent of a town of only 400 people?

    I guess they can't laugh at our bridge to nowhere anymore . . .

    --Greg

    1. Re:Not the brightest idea by Markus+Landgren · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Come on now, the EU spends zillions on all kinds of crap. This is nowhere near the top ten most wasteful. I'd rather see the EU spend my money on bringing sunlight to those people, than continue its present strategy of subsidizing tobacco plantations while spending money on anti-smoking campaigns. But I suppose my rulers have deemed our pockets deep enough to pay for all of these fantastic things!

    2. Re:Not the brightest idea by trollable · · Score: 1

      The EU wants to spend millions of dollars to light up a few percent of a town of only 400 people?

      I guess they are more interested by the experience itself and all the potential benefits. I have no doubt it was reviewed by quite a lot of people. If they got the money, there was probably an agreement on the usefullness of the project (but that already happens a few times they put money on dumb projects).

      I guess they can't laugh at our bridge to nowhere anymore . . .

      Comparable?

    3. Re:Not the brightest idea by StressedEd · · Score: 0
      subsidizing tobacco plantations

      I was going to ask for some references, then decided to go and look for myself. "Interesting."

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    4. Re:Not the brightest idea by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      First, the EU is not spending millions of dollars, it is spending $1.2 million. Secondly, this works out at $3000/person - probably around what the town paid the EU in taxes over five years. The existence of the mirrors will probably spark tourism, and the proof-of-concept demo will probably benefit the company, providing more jobs (both at the company and up the supply chain), which means more tax money. It seems like a fairly good investment.

      This kind of thing is not that uncommon in the EU, and is known as objective one matched funding. If you have a project that will create jobs, then it is relatively easy to get the EU to pay for half of it, on the basis that the knock-on benefits to the economy will generate an overall benefit.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Not the brightest idea by trongey · · Score: 1

      ...the EU is not spending millions of dollars, it is spending $1.2 million...

      1.2 million is more than one million. That would seem to qualify as millions.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    6. Re:Not the brightest idea by NardofDoom · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't waste your breath (bits? electrons?) on explaining projects that enhance the common good to these people. They're Randists that have been beaten with the myth of 'the invisble hand of the market place.' In their mind, people shouldn't expect the government to build roads, let alone create jobs through direct economic stimulus.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    7. Re:Not the brightest idea by graffix_jones · · Score: 1

      Everybody so far in the commentary to this story has been off by almost a factor of two. They're spending £1.2 million, which, by current exchange rates, works out to be about $2,057,641.

      Also, you can't do an economic analysis by how many villagers will be affected, you instead have to look at how much square footage will be covered in light for this price (since not all villagers will benefit equally from this project).

      Since they plan on having 8 to 10 hotspots "the size of your standard front yard", we'll assume that a 'standard' front yard (in Europe) is about 10 feet by 20 feet in size, for 200 sq.ft. total per yard. (I'm pretty sure this is erring on the 'high' side)

      Now, multiply that by the amount of hot spots expected, and you get 1,600 to 2,000 sq.ft. of sunlight.
      Now, doing the math with the figures above, that works out to be about $1,028 to $1,286 per square foot of sunlight... of course this is only the one-time construction cost of the project... the maintenance costs will also have to be taken into account (and none of the articles linked here make any mention of what it'll cost to remove snow from the mirrors in mid-winter).

    8. Re:Not the brightest idea by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Come on, the EU's a government just like any other. Contractors on big government projects like this usually find efficiencies, reductions of the scope and other ways to make savings. So, I confidently predict it'll be less than 1 million.

      It's not like they could get away with any shenanigans, what with the EU being so strict with their accounting.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  21. Austrian Town Ducks the Sark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who-wood half-thunk they wood suck the dark from the rat mountain in Austrailia? Plug-em in cowboy!

  22. Map on news.telegraph by worf_mo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last January news.telegraph had an article about this that featured kind of a map on how the mirrors will be positioned.

  23. I can see the headlines... by heatdeath · · Score: 1

    Youths vandalize giant mirror, killed by angry mob of suicidal depressed villiagers.

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
  24. Re:Cool! by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Whew. For a second there I was worried that Arky was involved. I've included a link for those that have never experienced Archimedes Plutonium on Usenet. He's a true net legend/kook.

    Dartmouth claims he's real (I saw the photos way back when) but, nah, I'm not buying.

  25. Oh Boy by Ours · · Score: 1

    Lets hope this sets a trend and somebody will poney-up to make a city-wide fog vacuum. By the end of the month the city will be fogged up with little sunlight until spring, *sniff*.

    --
    "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
  26. slashdot is not for breaking news by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    repeat:

    slashdot is not for breaking news

    that's not the purpose of this website

    now go crawl back into whatever hole you came from

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  27. Slashdotted! by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't seem to read the site. It seems to be slashdotted.

    So, does anyone have a good...umm...mirror?

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  28. Convex or concave mirror? by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Hope they get the right one or they'll be melting the local chocolate shop.

    --
    Task Mangler
  29. It's just about possible ... by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1

    ... that the EU is helping to fund this as a way of getting the bugs out of the technology on a small scale before trying to deploy full-scale orbital mirrors (which have a lot of uses other than lighting up dark towns).

    --
    James P. Barrett
  30. Re:Australia by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    I think those are called rabbits.

  31. Rat Mountain? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhm, I don't think so. The places name derives from a guy named Rapoto, offspring of a noble Bavarian lineage, the "Rapotonen". The Rattenberg castle at least dates back to 10th century. More than enough time for the names to change.

  32. Tourist landmark by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live in a country neighboring Austria. When the mirror is up I definitively will pay a visit and spend between 5 and 100 EUR in the town. Just because I and my family like trips. And, if we like it, we might return.

    Why build the Eiffel tower? Why build the statue of liberty (and give the ugly thing away?) Why were the funny looking Gaudi buildings built? Why did Linus do it? This list can get pretty long but the common factor is that at the beginning nobody really knew if it really was a good idea.

    The truly strange thing is that this mirror thingy is referred to as a technology. Isn't that like calling a hamburger gastronomy?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Tourist landmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well of course it is technology. All this computer stuff used to be known as *high* technology. There's a charity (?) calling itself Intermediate Technology Development Group http://www.itdg.org/ who develop low-tech things for the third world. Even a hammer is technology, multiplying the strenght of the human arm.

  33. Next great EU project... by Hymer · · Score: 1

    ...will be placing a giant mirror in space... so the northern part of Sweden and Finland can get some sun in the winter... EU could even try to sell some winter-sunshine to Norway and NW Russia...

    1. Re:Next great EU project... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      The Enviromentalists would kill it. After all, it would only help global warming. And think of the animals! They like night time!

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  34. This discussion gave me a nice idea... by JollyFinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A large curved mirror at polar orbit. Think how nice it would be that sunlight of few square kilometers worth that would be otherwice wasted would be directed on a area of meter wide and few meters in length. Sure the atmostphere would widen the affected area so that people could "enjoy" a nice little hot wave ;) And as the earth revolves under it, it could be designed in a way that most people on earth could enjoy it ;) [Except in cases when the mirror is turned to other direction] The polar orbit is good for keeping it in the sun ALL the time. Another good option is Geostationary so that you can deside WHERE to aim it when it works.

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Gerry Anderson is prophetic again! by Yooden_Vranx · · Score: 3, Funny

    For a sneak peek at what happens next, see the classic Thunderbirds episode "Lord Parker's 'Oliday" :) http://www.fanderson.org.uk/epguides/tbirds2eg.htm l#Episode%20Four

    1. Re:Gerry Anderson is prophetic again! by deroby · · Score: 1

      OOohhhh, *I* wanted to say that !! =) Hope they make these mirrors freak-storm-resistant =)

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
  37. Re:cool! by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 2, Funny

    You win the palindrome UID prize! Congrats! You can pick up your toyota at any dealer now. Second prize is two toyotas!

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  38. in AUSTRIA not AUSTRALIA by dns_server · · Score: 2, Informative

    It appears that the writer of the heading has goten confused, the town of Rattenberg is located in AUSTRIA which is a country in europe not australia which is in the southern hemosphere. Why would the EU be paying for a project on the other side of the world in australia? Infact the article makes no reference to australia only austria.

  39. All I can think of by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is Wyle E. Coyote and a giant "Acme" mirror.
    Unintended consequences ensue.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  40. other way around. by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    I wish they could just take some of our sunlight here in Africa and reflect it there.It's strange how man always try to control the world instead of accepting and adapting. It's got its pros and cons. Just like doing the opposite of course. I mean, imagine channeling some water or snow to the desert areas. It might make deserts habitable and pleasant to live in , but will also destroy entire eco-systems. But this idea for a small circle of sunlight sounds very nice, but definitely not worth the cost!

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    1. Re:other way around. by Bob_Villa · · Score: 1

      How expensive is it to build a large pipeline, like they use for oil, and pump ocean water to the deserts? Or if the salt is a bad thing, add some kind of desalination process along the way. If it was possible to do that, and then plant trees, I think it would be amazing if we could turn the Sahara Desert or other deserts into giant forests. I wonder how much climate change would occur from converting a desert back to forest?

      I guess this is off-topic, but if countries will spend millions to make a couple of sunny spots, why can't they spend money to make the deserts more inhabitable?

    2. Re:other way around. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      The main problem with a pipeline for water is still the purification and cost. Oil csts ~$60/ 55 gallons right now. Water (in the US at elast) is about $4 dollars for that much. Also, with water you have to keep the pipes clean either through high pressure or chlorine in order to prevent bacteria/algae buildup (the stuff will make you sick) and you would still have some problems with rust that you don't get with oil. However, if you can get one to work, more power to you.

      Now, as for the desert. De-desertification is a long process for one main reason. Sand. Sand contains large ammounts of salt and has to be completely removed in order to be able to grow anything. This is already happening in several places in Africa (I believe Egypt is one). It's hard and tedious, but it is occuring. Good soil is beneath the sand, but you still have to remove a lot of sand in order to get to the soil. I think it's a great idea, pushing back the desert, but it's going to take a while to push back a desert as large and old as the Sahara. The fact that people keep cutting down the forests over there for farmland doesn't help either.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  41. Eiffel Tower by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    It was scheduled for demolition; but then it was found pretty useful as a radio relay.

  42. Re:2 words by manojar · · Score: 1

    I am not from USA :p

  43. I beg to differ... by Sirch · · Score: 1

    I respectfully beg to differ. (See the mention of 'Avacado Danger').

    3,000 UKP for cutting yourself in someone else's kitchen through your own stupidity. What is the world coming to?

    I'm off to put my hand in the shredder - "Noone told me of the dangers of sticking my hand in a shredder!"

    1. Re:I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is the UK, not Europe. The UK is, to all intents and purposes, part of America {and being used as a proving ground for the setting up of the total surveillance state}. The only reason the EU haven't actually kicked their behinds out is that they still hope the UK might join the Euro; then the EU+UK could negotiate to buy crude oil in Euros, rather than US dollars. Right now, dual pricing would be uneconomical; so the USA is effectively able to cream a little off every oil purchase anywhere in the world, since no other country is able to supply US dollars in sufficient quantities. The UK holds the balance of power since, if the money it spends on oil were changed into Euros and added to what the EU spends on oil, it would outweigh what the US spends on oil and it would be more sensible to sell it by the Euro. This would mightily piss-off the USA, but Europe would beat them easily in war.

      UK will join the Euro only if a prime-minister elects who is no big fan of America and wants to make it 04/07/1776 again, only the other way around this time i.e. UK declaring independence from USA. Tony Blair is carrying on Thatcher's work, taking more than its fair share of the benefits of membership without contributing as much as it ought. EU will evict UK if it does not join Euro soon, because there will be less dependency on oil in EU.

    2. Re:I beg to differ... by quigonn · · Score: 1

      The UK is not Europe, although they claim otherwise.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    3. Re:I beg to differ... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      3000 UKP is nothing compared to what they would have received in the US.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:I beg to differ... by mpilsbury · · Score: 1

      I think that should be GBP not UKP.

  44. Wasn't this a "Thunderbirds" episode? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    and the Hood sabotaged the mirror assembly so that the suns rays would set fire to the town.

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Wasn't this a "Thunderbirds" episode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was about to post it too :)
      indeed, was a thunderbirds episode, can't believe i still remember that!

    2. Re:Wasn't this a "Thunderbirds" episode? by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was on Thunderbirds. They tried using one of their ships to lift the mirror assembly but that did not work. I'm really surprised there are not more rferences to that episode in this article.

  45. Re:Australia by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

    The kangaoroo's what?

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  46. Rattenberg Homepage by derphilipp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rattenberg_(Tirol)
    The article says that Rattenberg is famous for its glass-processing industry.

    --
    Spelling mistakes: My is english spoken not tongue of mother.
  47. Actaully, not quite by pin_gween · · Score: 1

    This was on the BBC News website two weeks ago, in fairness atleast can we see the news when it happens

    The BBC article you refer to deals with Italy -- and they are only dreaming about it.

    --
    Ignorance is not a crime; neither should it be a way of life

    Congress control $ = inmates run the asylum
  48. more fun solution - demolish the mountain! by speculatrix · · Score: 1
    town was built in the winter shadow of Rat Mountain

    wouldn't it be more interesting to demolish part of the mountain?

    1. Re:more fun solution - demolish the mountain! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      No, blasting the mountain would be a cheap shot...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:more fun solution - demolish the mountain! by smithmc · · Score: 1

        wouldn't it be more interesting to demolish part of the mountain?

      Naw, put it on rails so they can move it out of the way in the winter...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  49. fair deal on sunlight for Santa! Re:Don't like it? by speculatrix · · Score: 1
    Seems like they're better off than all the folks near the arctic circle, but you don't see/hear them complaining...

    Ho Ho Ho says Santa! It's cold and dark here up here at the North Pole. I demand that world governments unite to change the earth's tilt so that we can warm the place up and get some friggin sunlight all year round.

    Think of my Elves and how much more productive they'd be if it were warmer!

  50. Rat Mountain by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What? That's an ord name. oi'd ov called it Chuzzwazzer Mountain.

    1. Re:Rat Mountain by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the mod didn't see the Simpsons episode where light is made of Australian slang.

  51. Picture link by jetmarc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Using the FP as plug for a picture..

  52. Considering that I live in Switzerland... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

    There is a REALLY simple solution, and it is not rocket science. Don't live in the shadow! Cynical said, for every shadow side there is a sunny side because to cast a shadow you need something to block the sun. So, DON'T build on the shadow side!

    Swiss that are from Graubuenden when buying houses the first thing they check is how the sun rises and sets! It is interesting to see how often a hill side is full of houses, and on the other side not a single house. There is a reason...

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    1. Re:Considering that I live in Switzerland... by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      Where would you grow food? There's a reason why the houses were build in the darker side.

  53. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just needs a little focusing to make it work....
    http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000933037362/

  54. All together now by Astronomypete · · Score: 0

    Always look on the bright side of life da da, da da, da da da da da da.. etc.

    --
    Better is the enemy of good enough. - Russian proverb.
  55. What about the shadow? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

    So if a big complex of mirrors is set up, they will create a large shadow behind them. Can we assume there isn't some other town or single family home (with fewer political connections) ending up in that shadow? I can see it now as these mirror farms spring up all over the place, different settlements stealing sunlight from other settlements. Sort of like the old days of living downstream ...

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  56. "But the young folks are moving away." by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Maybe it is because there are no good jobs there?

    There is a great website about Rattenburg, it states:
    "Rattenberg is a lovely village which is getting more and more popular because of its beautiful location, its charm and as an attraction to hikers and bikers."

    see: http://www.itcwebdesigns.com/tour_germany/rattenbe rg.htm

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  57. Acme by JeepingNET · · Score: 1

    I heard acme is the company producing the mirror

  58. correction by digitaldc · · Score: 0

    that is Rattenburg, Germany...never mind

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  59. Cast of "Legend" by doublem · · Score: 1

    The cast of "Legend" were not available for comment.

    Well, this one elf chick was, but she was babbling about human emotions and porridge.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  60. Statue of Liberty v. a big Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me say this as nice as I can. You are an idiot. To compare a mirror being built by a large company funded by government dollars to light a town to a gift from one grateful nation to another as a symbol of freedom, peace, friendship, and love is ridiculous at best! You know you people over their that are so damn anti-American should remember that Americans are people just like you. You judge us and hate us for our government and our past, well why don't you take a look at your people's government and past? In fact, most of the stuff we get blaimed for we learned from you! There are a lot of ugly things in the world, but I dare say that the gift from the French to a most grateful nation is not one of them. If you want ugly, while on your trip, take a walk up the mountain and take a look into that mirror.

  61. Re:Australia by GWTPict · · Score: 1

    Rabbits live in burrows not caves, try kobolds.

  62. Have you considered ... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    That spending money on "constructing" something is giving a job to someone, and it's way better than giving the money to the same person that is suddently out of a job (because you didn't spent the money in the first place?)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Have you considered ... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      That spending money on "constructing" something is giving a job to someone
      So would paying them to sweep the streets. I know which would be more useful too.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    2. Re:Have you considered ... by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      That spending money on "constructing" something is giving a job to someone, and it's way better than giving the money to the same person that is suddently out of a job

      Ahhh... so they are going to give the task of constructing giant mirrors to the unemployed.

      Allowing those that earned the money to keep it would be good for the economy too, as they could spend it on whatever they want. If they want big mirrors, then fine, if they used it to help pay for a house that is a 10 minute walk away and in the light, then they could do that.

      I wonder how much it would cost to remove the 910 meter hill, no wires or mirrors needed.

  63. Hotspots? by Herg · · Score: 1

    Why not take the "10 minute walk" to where the sunlight is? They want to create "hotspots", so it's not like this project brings sunlight to poeple's homes. They still have to walk/ride/be carried to a hotspot.

  64. Eh eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Little do they know that they're in fact building a death-ray!

  65. In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Skin cancer research finds a new home.

  66. Someone should let this guy know by bareman · · Score: 3, Funny

    www.solardeathray.com

    and send a photographer to capture the ensuing hilarity.. er, um.. I'm mean document the event.

  67. I, for one... by slowhand · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our Sunglass Hut vending overlords.

    Think about it. Barring breakage, the mirrors are sold once. Sunglasses will be sold in greater volumes, and Merry Maids who do windows/mirrors will laugh all the way to the bank. James Bond movies will film there, Dr Evil will exploit them, and The Shadow wil avoid the place altogether.
    Hoo-hoo-haa-haa-haa.

    Mod me insightful - I dare you!

    --
    Busy aligning my non-linear thoughts.
  68. Wow! Good job EU! by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

    And here I thought the US was king of the nonsensical pork projects, what with our bridges to nowhere and such. Hell, locally there's a highway that's torn up, and rebuilt.....a several feet to the east of where it use to be, and in some cases a few feet west. Entirely pointless. Must be millions down the tube. But this one, this one beats all.

  69. Mirrors cause a problem by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    So, will they have to build mirrors for the people who will now be in the shadow of the 1st mirrors?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  70. Cheaper permanent solution by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    blast the top off the offending mountain?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Cheaper permanent solution by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a lotta work. Can we make it invisible?

    2. Re:Cheaper permanent solution by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Yes, put a SEP Field generator on top of the mountain. That will make the whole mountain disappear.

      (I think the Somebody Else's Problem generator was a Douglas Adams invention.)

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  71. still no UV by pstils · · Score: 1

    though the glass would absorb the UV light and nobody would be able to tan themselves on it

  72. Did that with the Disney building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    60 Minutes had an article on the new Disney building that had hundreds of curved surfaces and the accidental problems it created. Nearby appartment complexes had suface temperatures of 140 degrees and up at the windows. (opps). Nearby intersections had pedestrian areas of 135 degrees. Certain streets that you drove down had half a dozen "suns" reflected blinding drivers. They "solved" they problem by sanding the mirrored surfaces so the light did not reflex.

  73. My $0.02 by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    But the young folks are moving away.
    I'd guess that's been said about most small towns since, well, since there WERE small towns.

    The headline could have more simply stated "EU Bureaucrats find reason to give glass firm subsidy." and be equally true.

    But the real question: would this reflected sunlight kill vampires, or is this some sort of wierd EU vampire-vacation spot subsidy in disguise?
      "See the sunlight! Don't get reduced to ashes!"
    Inquiring minds want to know!

    --
    -Styopa
  74. Where the sun don't shine by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this the place people have been telling me to stick my head all these years? Gosh I thought they meant something else.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  75. if you had read ... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    your parent post, you'd see that if they resettle, you will foot the bill anyway (unemployment, housing price pressure, etc etc).

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:if you had read ... by flood6 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I didn't read the parent's post I just quoted from it. If you had read my post, I said "want". That means it's up to them. If they don't have a place to stay or a job then I find it unlikely they are going to want to move. I'm not suggesting they be rooted out of their homes, or even offered a government "bonus" to move as the Grandparent mentioned. I'm saying it's their problem (if they see it as a problem).

      Simply put, they get no money to bring daylight to the little corner of earth the Flying Spaghetti Monster deemed should be dark half the year.

      They leave if and when they want to. They continue to slowly trickle out of the town as the article says they have been. This means no mass exodus from Rattflaufmansburgheim to upset the surrounding home market, no sudden unemployment spike, no problem.

  76. Golden Opportunity to by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    get some of those Prescott P4's, OC the hell out of the processor and do some folding@home.

    After it is done heating the house, just use some Dryer tubing and point it at your sidewalk/drive way....it'll be clear in no time.

    Get the whole town in on it and we'll find cures for stuff that doesn't even exist, yet.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  77. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Rabbits live in burrows not caves,

    Well, groundhogs, then...

    try kobolds.

    Or trolls.

  78. Now we know... by FreckledGruntBuggly · · Score: 1

    ...where they mean when they say stick this where the sun don't shine! :-)

  79. Italian Village plans to do the same by bombadillo · · Score: 1

    The Italian village of Viganella plans to do the same thing

    I submitted this story a few weeks ago and was rejected. I guess the slashgods of the day didn't think having giant mirrors on the side of a mountain was cool enough.

  80. Curious, can someone comment on this? by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    Is it really cheaper? I've seen analyses in similar situations before (like that whole Cumbre Viejos thing where people keep saying "just blast the mountain apart before it slides into the sea") and it's not always the case. Would like to see someone who knows a bit about this comment.

  81. Er, quick spellfix... by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    ..should be Cumbre Vieja.

  82. I live in switzerland too by theolein · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here in switzerland they face the very same problem, i.e. the real problem - mountain villages dying out - and they combat it in almost the exact same manor, i.e. the Bund or government pays millions every year for isolated little villages in Engadin in Graubünden that otherwise would have died out already. And what about Rumantsch? The language descended from the Romans spoken only in Graubünden in Switzerland that is rapidly dying out? There are only about 50'000 speakers left despite the language being given a standardised written form and many millions in subsidies etc by the government?

    Should they drop all of that as well?

    1. Re:I live in switzerland too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Why should a government create an artificial market in languages and failing cultures?

  83. Relocating light? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this be _RELOCATING_ or _REDIRECTING_ the light towards the town? If i understand this correctly, wouldn't that make a huge area where the sunlight would normally hit that in now a giant shadow of the mirrors rather than the town being in the shadow of the mountain? Couldn't this have devistating effects on life in other areas?

    Don't build your towns in stupid places. This was proven by New Orleans as well.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  84. Sounds fishy.... by chivo243 · · Score: 1

    this once happened here...and build a contraption large enough to block out the sun and plunge the town into complete darkness.

    --
    Sig Hansen?
  85. Maybe ... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    they already have clean streets (Austrian places I visited had remarkably clean streets), and now they want some light at winter. I say more power to them.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Maybe ... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      In France and Belgium the streets are filthy. And as it's EU money, it's coming partly from them. Which part of "Don't send me the bill" do you not understand?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  86. This would never work in the U.S. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    Judging from bullet-riddled signs in every rural part of the U.S. I've visited, these mirrors wouldn't last a single winter.

    It'd be kinda cool to hit one from a long way off if it was aimed at you. You'd know when you hit your target!

    ok, now I'm picturing a duel between a dozen 10-square meter 1000 meter focal length concave mirrors and a mortar.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  87. Rattenburg lighting project on LinkTV by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 1

    LinkTV has a 30-minute segment on this project I just watched the other night - http://www.linktv.org/programming/programDescripti on.php4?code=dwf_brilliant/ - if you have cable or satellite and are intertested in this project, catch this program.

  88. Depends on your point of view by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1
    Isn't that like calling a hamburger gastronomy?

    A crusty, yeasty bun, sliced just so, spread with homemade mayo, sprinkled with freshly ground black pepper, a perfectly done, just-past-rare home-ground hand-formed patty resting atop the mayo, juices mingling to create a perfect sauce, and a thick slice of decadent blue cheese melting over the meat - Yeah, that sounds like gastronomy to me.

    The hamburger, by the way, was Julie Childs favorite food. A pretty strong endorsement, IMO.

  89. Plenty of UV for me by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    I can burn quite easily through automotive glass. My office window is silvery glass and I'll burn if I don't keep the blinds closed.

    Yeah, I'm pasty, and yeah I burn easily but still...

    Also, they could use polycarbonate or acrylic or whatever clear material transmits the most UV. Or simply use frontsilvered mirrors.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:Plenty of UV for me by pstils · · Score: 1

      burn yes, tan no. burn - UVB, is different to tan - UVA Polycarbonate or acrylic will photodegrade. Frontsilvered mirrors would work, but damage easily. I suppose there is a material out there.

    2. Re:Plenty of UV for me by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Wow, someone on slashdot who knows about tanning.

      At least it is the science of tanning!

      I replaced a window with something that wasn't glass (I think acrylic) so my turtles would get UV light. They and the window have been healthy for over 10 years now. All the buses and light rail cars I ride have non-glass windows too (although the bus windows degrade rapidly from taggers and the solvents used to remove their "art.")

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  90. obscure game reference by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    So, what are YOU doing for Emperor Pausebeck's day?

  91. Re:Australia by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    And Jack Thompson.

  92. Which part of "don't ..." ?! by hummassa · · Score: 1

    The part where "the value of the project is paid by less than one year off the taxes the people of the city already pays and normally goes to subsidize other stuff, and now will be well used to create/construct something that will most certainly generate a lot of money (tourism, replenishing the human resources of the town) that will translate into more taxes being generated in that town that would some day be used to clean French and Belgian streets that are filthy (not that I know many -- in my trips to Paris and one of my friends' trip to the Loir valley we encountered clean streets, too)".

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Which part of "don't ..." ?! by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between being paid for by their taxes and the amount being less than the taxes they pay. And I'm sure they don't pay three grand a year each to the EU. Try comparing like with like next time.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  93. Just remove the mountain? by Pitr · · Score: 1

    C'mon, no one's suggested blowing up the mountain as an alternative yet? This is slashdot right? I'm so disillusioned... ;)

    --

    --Not to be worried, Pitr fix.
  94. Darn by krasmussen · · Score: 1

    Darn. Judging from the headline, I thought they had switched to GNU/Linux.

  95. My building has to use "District Heating" by andersh · · Score: 1

    Here in the capital of Norway, Oslo, all new buildings [where available] are required to use the surplus heat from powerplants (District Heating). The building I live in was constructed just a year ago and since the pipes ran down this street it was obviously going to be connected. Now my apartment is always nice and cosy throughout the long and cold Scandinavian winters. And the best part is that I don't pay anything for the heat - my electricity bills hardly register! :)

    1. Re:My building has to use "District Heating" by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I'd read about central heating in a few Danish cities, but I hadn't read that it was being done in Oslo. Of course, you'd expect the Scandinavians to do such a thing, if anyone would.

      I've also read of a few central heating plants in some Japanese cities, but I don't know any details.

      So, to get back on topic, is there any place in Scandinavia where there's a "central sunlight" utility? There must be a lot of places in Norway with problems similar to this Austrian town's. The south side of some of those east-west fjords must get pretty gloomy about this time of year. Have any Norwegian towns worked on a sunlight delivery system?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  96. Kidding, right? by hummassa · · Score: 1

    from the bottom to the top:
    I wonder how much it would cost to remove the 910 meter hill, no wires or mirrors needed. Answer: far (more than 100x) more (a 910m high hill is a lot of soil/stone to be removed) than to build a simple mirror in a town renowed for its glass work.
    Allowing those that earned the money to keep it would be good for the economy too Have you considered that some of the people in that town earned part of said money, too, and that the outcome of this is more money both for the town and the EU? That is the reason why countries subdisize their products -- the producer wins, the country also wins.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Kidding, right? by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      This is going to be harsh, but there's so much economic whishful thinking here, it's hard (for me, at least) not to get frustrated:

      Allowing those that earned the money to keep it would be good for the economy too

      Have you considered that some of the people in that town earned part of said money, too, and that the outcome of this is more money both for the town and the EU?

      If they want to spend their money on their project, fine. Others can spend their money on what they want. But apparently money spent by individuals vanishes into a black hole, but money spent by the government magically grows and returns to the people.

      That is the reason why countries subdisize their products -- the producer wins, the country also wins.

      Subsidies exist because of political payoffs (like US & EU agricultural susidies - keep farmers happy or you lose votes - never mind the 3rd world people it kills), keeping an industry safe in case of war (like US steel protections - also "buys" union votes and support) and economic ignorance. The money to keep an dying industry alive has to come from somewhere, and that always means some other industry loses out.

  97. Well, it's sure cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than the tunnel would have been.

  98. Re:fair deal on sunlight for Santa! Re:Don't like by guaigean · · Score: 1

    Hey, it's no joke. I live in North Pole, Alaska. It's dark, it's cold, and winters can really suck. But I sure as hell don't expect the govt to fork over a heating system. If I wanted to be toasty warm I'd live in Cali, but I choose the space and differences of Alaska, so I also have to take on the downfalls. Every place has its drawbacks, but that doesn't mean I should have to pay for everyone in Texas to have portable air conditioning any more than they should have to pay for sunlight for me.

    --
    Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
  99. Ok, but no repeats, please by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
    If they're out now, can we at least avoid putting them back in exactly the same place?

    If they can't move, can they at least be somewhere where they don't have to move or risk death?

    If I have to pay to have their home rebuilt, can I at least avoid having to pay for it again?

  100. Re:being an Helsinki citizen by Judge_Fire · · Score: 1

    Actually, heated sidewalks can be found in Helsinki.

    What's far more disturbing is the ongoing tearing up of streets all over the city to install a central cooling grid!!!

    Then again, it makes sense. Ground is slowly rising in Helsinki at a 40 cm per 100 years rate (the ice age glaciers were pretty heavy) which compensates nicely for rising sea levels. The cooling thing must be for rising temperatures. ; )

    J

  101. what about the shadow? by glyph42 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that another small town, on the other side of the mirror, will be cast in a giant shadow for part of the day?

    --
    Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
  102. But I want free stuff... by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
    ...and you should pay for it!

    Forget the mirrors, fetch me a keg and some hookers. That'll raise morale around here!

  103. What about the vampires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But where will all the vampires go? Won't somebody please think of the vampires!

  104. Rattenberg's drawbacks... by joetheappleguy · · Score: 1
    In a poll of four years ago, about 50 percent of Rattenbergers listed lack of winter sunlight as their biggest disadvantage.


    The ravenous rat hordes from Rat Mountain was listed as the #2 disavantage.
  105. Actually, the Simpson building is real by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    Whoaaa.... I read this then realized that this a completely differnt episode that I was thinking of. Ever watch the Simpsons episode where Marge has Springfield build a concert hall?? Well the building in the Simpsons is based on a real life which I assume to be the Walt Disney Concert Hall. It's claim to faim was that it was a big giant shiny mirror that heated people's apartments across the street and blinded people as they were driving. Aparently, this effect can be seen in most cities where the temperature is presumably warmer because the buildings reflect the sunlight.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  106. The economics of this don't make sense! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    So they're spending over $5000 per person to provide sunlight to the residents of a small town?!? Couldn't they keep every resident supplyed with full spectrum lightbulbs for the rest of their lives for far less money? Seems to me these people knew they were in the shadow of a mountain when they chose to live there in the first place...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  107. Re:being an Helsinki citizen by jc42 · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I hadn't heard of such a cooling "utility".

    At one of the universities that I was at, there was a similar sort of central cooling system. Some decades ago, a number of departments started installing cooling equipment that dumped the heat into the water system. Eventually, this resulted in the water system being tied into the campus power/heating system, with water being cycled back to the central plant to adjust its temperature (hotter in winter, cooler in summer). Since this was done with big centralized equipment, it was more efficient than lots of separate small boxes would be. But this wasn't ever installed fully everywhere on the campus, so cooling was never as efficient as heating.

    This approach is widely used in large buildings (hospitals, hotels, skyscrapers), where the water pipes are often used as heat sources and sinks as needed, and the building's power plant continuously adjusts the hot/cold temperatures as needed.

    But who would have thought there would ever be a need for cooling in Helsinki? ;-)

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  108. Re:Shadows... by jc42 · · Score: 1

    ... the town will probably see an endless stream of shadow puppet pranks.

    And in a few years, we'll see them organizing a Shadow Puppet Festival, with thousands of tourists attending. Eventually it'll be turned into a Broadway musical and Hollywood movie.

    This is in the Austrian Alps, you know.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  109. Wouldn't it be cheaper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to remove the hill? Drill aerodynamic bullet holes through it? Pay everyone to move?

  110. Oddly enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > So, if drinking the holy blood makes you immortal...

    Never heard of transubstantiation? :)

    Anyhow, Orthodox doctrine says that Mary was assumed (taken up) into Heaven, like Enoch & co. so there aren't supposed to *be* any remains (indeed, you'd be hard pressed to find any church claiming to have such a relic, and if you know much about relics, you'd know how much they'd want relics of someone like her).