Slashdot Mirror


Apple and Nike Team up for iPod Shoe Interface

lyonsden writes "Apple and Nike are teaming up to provide runners a system to integrate their shoes and their iPod. A $30 antenna will connect an iPod nano with special shoes to provide pedometer functions."

300 comments

  1. Nike+Apple=??? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    What would happen if Nike & Apple got together?

    Below is an email correspondence with customer service representatives at iPOD iD, an on-line service that lets people buy personalized iPOD shoes. The dialog began when iPOD cancelled an order for a pair of shoes customized with the word "sweatshop." [get the latest on this story at shey.net]

    From: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    To: "'W. McFarnby (not really)'"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Your iPOD iD order was cancelled for one or more of the following reasons.

    1) Your Personal iD contains another party's trademark or other intellectual property.
    2) Your Personal iD contains the name of an athlete or team we do not have the legal right to use.
    3) Your Personal iD was left blank. Did you not want any personalization?
    4) Your Personal iD contains profanity or inappropriate slang, and besides, your mother would slap us.

    If you wish to reorder your iPOD iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.iPOD.com
    Thank you,
    iPOD iD

    From: "W. McFarnby (not really)"
    To: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Greetings,

    My order was canceled but my personal iPOD iD does not violate any of the criteria outlined in your message. The Personal iD on my custom ZOOM XC USA running shoes was the word "sweatshop." Sweatshop is not: 1) another's party's trademark, 2) the name of an athlete, 3) blank, or 4) profanity. I choose the iD because I wanted to remember the toil and labor of the children that made my shoes. Could you please ship them to me immediately.

    Thanks and Happy New Year,
    Wynn McF (not really)

    From: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    To: "'W. McFarnby (not really)'"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Dear iPOD iD Customer,

    Your iPOD iD order was cancelled because the iD you have chosen contains, as stated in the previous e-mail correspondence, "inappropriate slang".

    If you wish to reorder your iPOD iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.iPOD.com

    Thank you,
    iPOD iD

    From: "W. McFarnby (not really)"
    To: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Dear iPOD iD,

    Thank you for your quick response to my inquiry about my custom ZOOM XC USA running shoes. Although I commend you for your prompt customer service, I disagree with the claim that my personal iD was inappropriate slang. After consulting Webster's Dictionary, I discovered that "sweatshop" is in fact part of standard English, and not slang. The word means: "a shop or factory in which workers are employed for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions" and its origin dates from 1892. So my personal iD does meet the criteria detailed in your first email.

    Your web site advertises that the iPOD iD program is "about freedom to choose and freedom to express who you are." I share iPOD's love of freedom and personal expression. The site also says that "If you want it done right...build it yourself." I was thrilled to be able to build my own shoes, and my personal iD was offered as a small token of appreciation for the sweatshop workers poised to help me realize my vision. I hope that you will value my freedom of expression and reconsider your decision to reject my order.

    Thank you,
    Wynn McF (not really)

    From: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    To: "'W. McFarnby (not really)'"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Dear iPOD iD Customer,

    Regarding the rules for personalization it also states on the iPOD iD web site that "iPOD reserves the right to c

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Aadain2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You realize that Nike hasn't run sweatshops for a long time now right? The factories in Asia used to be contracted by Nike to produce shoes, so Nike did not own them. After all the bad PR they moved in and took over the factories and now the people have very nice working conditions and earn a much higher than average wage compared to the rest of the countries over there. If you would like to end sweatshops, try talking to Adidas, Rebook, etc, which still do use sweatshop in Asia.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by DeadPrez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should have just changed your name to "child_labor" as that would be a more formal description.

    3. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Another possibility with a Nike/Apple experience is what I ran into this morning in trying to upgrade my Apple Quicktime (free) software on a Windows XP box - it said my email address was invalid (amusing, guess all 20,000 students at the UW don't have emails).

      Which makes me think of someone running along, listening to their iPod, and it starts to download a firmware upgrade and cuts out midstride, setting their running shoes on fire.

      Feet don't fail me now!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by johndierks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually played with that site a few years back to see which terms were acceptable and which weren't, and it appeared that the word 'labor' was not allowed. Strange considering 'labor' is a fitting term to what one might do in running shoes.

    5. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that Nike hasn't run sweatshops for a long time now right?

      Nike never ran factories - they outsourced component manufacturing & assembly.

      They continue to do that (in sweatshops), but you are (surprisingly) kind of right that we should not be too harsh on nike - because everyone does it. Apple, IBM, wal-mart, hoover, disney, etc. All the multinats.

      The first world sits atop the third. It's sad, but that's the reality.

    6. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by bertramwooster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh. I thought you were going to say Nipple. Never mind.

    7. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I don;t know what you consider "Higher then average wage" but if people make less then $2 per day and have a family of four to support then I would consider that sweatshop conditions.

    8. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by f0dder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not like the natives had jobs before the companies came in. Over time what happens is the sweat shop given the right infrastructure, the people become self reliant and form their own companies. Wasn't japan, korea, taiwan once sweatshop to american companies. Now they kick our collective arses in electronics, automobiles & other industries. it's not all the gloom & doom antiglobalization zealot makes it out to be.

    9. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

      The most intuitive interface. Even babies know to use Nipple(c) without reading the user manual.

    10. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by TrueXtremeIcon · · Score: 1

      No, you obviously don't understand...$0.50 a day per person in the family is LOADS of cash to them. Just IMAGINE if they got paid Two Euros a day!

      --
      T-X-I
    11. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. The last time I recall the issue coming up was when Nike was claiming in their advertisements that they had improved conditions for the sweatshop workers and that they were not sweatshops anymore. I remember this because they were sued for false advertising, but the court ruled that while Nike's claims were in fact false, their lie was protected by the 1st Ammendment.

      This was from an article linked by /. a couple years ago, so anything resembling detail is gone. Except the "it's okay for them to lie about sweatshops because of the 1st Ammendment" thing, since the insanity that causes the word "person" in the 14th Ammendment to apply to corporations but not homosexuals (at least until very recently) is a major pet peeve of mine.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Hikaru79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How on EARTH did you manage to get that novel-sized post in as first post? I can't even type FRIST PSTO!!! fast enough to get it, and you're here writing War and Peace... I feel so inadequate.

    13. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Durinthal · · Score: 1

      There's a user manual?

    14. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      'labor' is the last thing I'd want to do in Nikes. That's what work boots are for. Why get a perfectly good pair of leisure/exercise shoes filthy and/or ripped up?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by kkiller · · Score: 1

      Cut, paste, find and replace?

    16. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Funny

      'labor' is the last thing I'd want to do in Nikes. That's what work boots are for.

      aren't you barefoot during labor?

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    17. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Intelligent first posts are now a 'subscriber bonus,' really. If you give /. a bunch of cash they let you see stories a few minutes early, and if you happened to have previously requested a mildly inappropriately labeled iPod from Apple (or known where to get text of an order like this) you're suddenly five steps ahead of everyone else. As long as you know how to use a text editor, that is.

    18. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Gilraen · · Score: 1

      This is great stuff.

    19. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Apparently Americans are born, live, and die with their boots on.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    20. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Orangejesus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do missions work in third world countries. I see a lot of these "sweatshops" myself, and have to say that it upsets me how backwards americans have it in their bubble little rich world. These so called "sweatshops" that all the americans protest are fantastic for the communities they usually go into. These people have nothing, they make nothing, they barely survive and in often cases they don't. Their lives are extremely hard and sweatshop or not they do backbreaking work from sunup to sundown in order to survive. The "sweatshop" jobs are highly prized with often thousands of people competeing for the most menial jobs. as someone can make litterally 100 times what they were making before. These "sweatshops" allow people to buy basic necessities for their families. It allows them to send their daughters to school instead of selling them into prostitution. And they bring (relative)wealth into the communitites. I'm not saying they are perfect, i'm not saying that it doesn't suck to work in these places, but it is SO MUCH BETTER than what they had before. I'm sure everyone means well, and they have these ideas of 5 year olds being chained to conveyor belts but thats just simply not how it is.

    21. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Aadain2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, in this country $2 a day is impossible to live on, especially for a family. But in OTHER countries $2 has the equivalent buying power for hundreds of $ a day. This is one of the biggest short comings of protesters in America: not every place on the planet has the same level of inflation or equivalent prices for food/objects as in the US. Do some research, find out how much the average livable wage in a country is before condeming a company for paying their employees those wages.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    22. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Rude-Boy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most informed people who complain about sweatshops aren't complaining about what we might consider low wages. Rather, they are complaining about the long hours and poor working conditions. Just because these jobs might be better then the alternatives doesn't absolve the company of the moral responsiblity not to work these people like slaves just because it's "better then what they had before".

      If these companies paid a fair wage and provided good working conditions, you would see very few people complaining.

    23. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by L33THa0R69 · · Score: 0

      I have a long winded opinion that I'm about to start writing about so if I loose interest half way through and this stops abrubtly you know what happened.

      At a time of very quickly increasing oil prices (largley due to increased demand from China and India) inflation in developing countries has been kept under control. Very cheap labour....

      Ah fuck it.

      Blah blah blah

      Slave labour prices blah blah celebraty whores make lots of money blah blah fast track development runining the environment blah blah look how fucked South Korea's environment is blah blah enough Chinese to keep making our shoes and ps3s untill the planet is fucked and if Chinese labour prices get too high there is always Africa blah blah blah

    24. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "Sure, in this country $2 a day is impossible to live on, especially for a family. But in OTHER countries $2 has the equivalent buying power for hundreds of $ a day."

      Don't overstate your argument. When strictly compared to the local standard of living, what you say is true. But it's not like these people are living in well-built houses with clean water and reliable electricity, using their microwaves and blenders to make meals and driving Toyotas or Fords. It's just that they're slightly better off than the people down the road that live in the mud shack with the roof made from salvaged tar-paper.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    25. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by JediLow · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Thats bull. Take for instance China (Xining - the capital of Qinghai province), the GDP of an individual was $800... while its a little higher than $2 a day, its not much, and people in that city enjoy clean water, well-built houses, and electricity.

      The American-centric attitude that people have really just makes me sick. Try going to a different country before making all these claims about how we're treating other people so badly - they have the option to take that job or not, and the people that have those jobs are happy they have them (yes, I know people in that situation... and I myself am an immirgrant to the United States).

    26. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by geekpowa · · Score: 1

      Whilst it is true that wages need to be normalised against buying power, your argument overall is false. In most developing countries an unskilled wage barely enough to put food on the table. People literally live day to day and to skip work for a few days create a very significant financial strain. For example, taxi drivers were I live work 24 hour shifts, straight, 4+ days a week and they barely scrape together enough money to feed their families. One driver told me that if he gets sick for a few days it instantly causes hardship for him and his family. People work to the absolute limit of human endurance and simply cannot command enough wealth to buy themselves the occasional reprieve from such a grinding existance. The difference between being a working adult in the west vs being a working adult in a developing country is shocking, especially if you are unskilled. Sweatshops, where they are permitted to exist, are part of that equation.

    27. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please point to a country where a person making $2/day has a similar standard of living to someone in America making $100/day.

    28. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Aadain2001 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was talking about. Nike came in to those sweatshops and changed that for those working in those factories. Instead of needing to push themselves to their physical limits in order to just buy food, they are closer to employees in the West. They can get sick and not starve their families. They can work regular hours and not 24+ hour marathon shifts. While other companies continue the bad worth ethics that you describe, Nike does not, and people need to recognize this for other companies to start to think to change their ways.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    29. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 0

      i'm sure you can find an illustrated guide on the internets.

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
    30. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Nick+Jackolson · · Score: 0

      Modded 30% overrated!?!? Whoever modded that obviously have sick morals.

      (yeah mod this down with bad karma while you all sit and pat each others back in your wealthy comfort, congratulating each other than you can throw out several hundrede dollars on a pair of shoes that cost a few bucks to produce in a third world country)

    31. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superb

    32. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by AfricanImpi · · Score: 1
      As has been pointed out by others, $2 a day is actually a fairly decent wage for much of the world, and it is certainly enough to live on. Not enough to live a comfortable middle-class life, of course, but enough to get some shelter and avoid starving.

      One thing all the anti-sweatshop advocates also seem to forget is that where sweatshops are located, the only other option for employment is usually backbreaking work in the fields all day, a far harsher job with much less pay than a sweatshop job.

      In fact, a job at a sweatshop often offers such people their only route out of that grinding poverty. Sweatshops, even while they sound bad, offer the highest wages in the area, certainly more than you'd get in working the fields. This means that workers at sweatshops are finally able to get some extra 'spare' money for use in self-improvement, such as education for themselves and their children.

      Sweatshops, far from being the evil many protestors in the West believe them to be, are actually the bottom rung of the ladder. We tend to dislike them, because we're all sitting happily on higher rungs, but for somebody in a dirt-poor part of the world this bottom rung represents a heaven-sent opportunity to advance themselves and drag themselves out of poverty. If you force sweatshops to close, as some evidently want, you kick that bottom rung out and essentially kick all those people in the face. Because without any skills, and being unable to use their comparative advantage (lower wages), they stand no chance whatsoever of getting a formal job if that bottom rung is gone.

      Looked at rationally and objectivity, sweatshops are a necessary part of a country's economic evolution. All successful countries, from the US to South Korea to all of Europe, have gone through a sweatshop stage in their development. It would be wrong to tell the poorest countries of the third world that we're not going to allow them to try catch up fairly.

    33. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by maggot+the+shrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The distinction is irrelevant. Nike dictates all the terms to the sweatshops that make Nike shoes and they are specifically culpable for their decision to stop doing business in Korea and Taiwan after those sweatshops unionized to seek out cheaper, more exploitative places elsewhere.

      http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops /nike/

      You are regurgitating Nike propoganda, which has been demonstrated to be false. Nike is not responding to bad publicity by addressing the problem, they are responding on the cheap by hiring PR firms to "shore up their image."

    34. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      As long as you know how to use a text editor, that is
      Snob.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Wyrd01 · · Score: 1

      You realize that Nike hasn't run sweatshops for a long time now right?

      Screenshot or it didn't happen.

    36. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      You're just plain wrong. Read this

    37. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, this has nothing to do with a "Livable wage". The point is that if they paid people over there a fair wage, they would be considered rich and at the same time the companies could still save money compared to hiring people in First World countires. Most importantly, Third World countries need skilled labor jobs not jobs making shoes.

    38. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by ALikelyStory · · Score: 1

      Except that all the countries who became prosperous historically went through a long period of *protectionism* for their own developing industries and products.... including the US, including Japan, etc.

      But protectionism has been under attack. So the outcome is likely to be quite different, such as, continuing to have a huge desperately poor underclass rather than development (look at Mexico, e.g.)

    39. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking of Nike sweatshops... Does anybody know where i can get some good wanna-be chuck taylors? Ever since Nike bought out converse ive been buying my chucks used, which is really hard to do... Id much rather find some no-name chuck clones.

      surely someone out there makes a cheap canvas high-top. Someone besides Nike that is.

    40. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Infoport · · Score: 1

      This humorous post SHOULD SAY that
      "Below is a SIMULATED email correspondence with customer service representatives at iPOD iD..."

      It is actually a reworded version of an OLD emil from 2001, which can be found at http://www.shey.net/niked.html The re-write author links to this in the text "not really", but it still seems "not really" clear that this is NOT recent email with Nike-- THAT is how he got this out on the Slashdot article so quickly.

      To be fair, he DOES say "with apologies to Jonah H. Peretti", who is the person who had the original correspondence with Nike 5 1/2 years ago.

    41. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      i don't know, but there sure are a lot of manual users.

    42. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      You're probably right - I should've made it clearer.

      In my defense, I did link to the source material nine times in the post. :-/

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    43. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Infoport · · Score: 1

      You DID link to it-- I actually followed that link, but I was confused beforehand since it seemed like I had read it before.
      I don't think everyone will follow the links though or realize that it is a rewrite (which I thought was FUNNY btw). In fact, I also replied to another emailer who wondered how you posted such a long email so quickly.http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid= 186474&cid=15395710

      also, I only included the Tom Lehrer quote in that reply because it seemed funny...it did seem like you were linking to the original author, just not in a way clear to the casual user (the less-casual user FOLLOWS LINKS!) No disrespect meant, just wanted to clear up a confusion I saw myself and others having.

    44. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by AfricanImpi · · Score: 1
      Actually, it has been during times of protectionism (such as the Smoot-Hawley Act), that economic growth has slowed down. While rich countries today did historically have periods of protectionism, they saw their best growth in times with freer trade.

      In fact, it's free trade that allows these countries to come off the ladder's bottom rung. With protectionism, foreign companies are far less free to invest in a given country, and so much needed capital is not injected. Also, it raises the cost of living unnecessarily, effectively negating any benefit it might have.

      Just take a look at South Korea. In 1960, it was poorer than North Korea, yet today it is many hundreds of times wealthier. That's because it embraced a free-trade development model, which did include sweatshops initially. Their free trade model worked because it forced the country to become competitive in selling products to a foreign market, which is of course far larger than the market in one's own country could ever be.

      Finally, globalisation is a fact of life now, and there's no way to stop it. To adopt protectionist measures in the modern era would be economic suicide, and that's aside from the numerous downsides of protectionism. Indeed, I would suggest reading a book called Open World, which goes into the matter in a lot more depth.

    45. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always, ALWAYS, question the source. Is this an unbiased assessment of the so-called 'sweatshop' companies, or does this news agency, reporter, etc. have an axe to grind?

      In a course of Business Ethics as a Soph. in college I did a critical paper asking us to 'take a side' re: the evidence that is out there on Nike and the whole sweatshop culture. What I found is there is tons of info to support just about any angle you wish to take on Nike, good or bad.

      I notice no one has yet pointed out the work of the Nike Foundation,
      (http://www.nike.com/nikebiz/nikefoundation)
      or the fact that Nike is part of a third-party monitoring group (http://www.fairlabor.org), which is freely able to make unannounced inspections of all the corporation's factories. They post their findings on the web and Nike and the other partner companies are not able to do a damn thing about what they post.

      If you're curious about how Nike actually is reported by an independent monitoring agency, have a look here:
      http://www.fairlabor.org/2005report/companies/part icipating/accredited_nike.html

      The above points to the last annual report put out re: Nike's working conditions, detailing the sort of issues found. They also decided to grant accreditation to Nike for 2005, and they detail their code of conduct that companies must adhere to, to get this accreditation.

      And yes, question the source of THIS post (esp. because I am posting Anonymous). For full disclosure, that Soph. student later became a Nike employee :), so you can guess which side I ended up taking.
      But I did so after checking out ALL the sides, not just the gut-instinct fear mongering put out by radicalized environmentalists.

      Now, back to the flame-induced troll-fest already in progress :P

    46. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by DRM_is_Stupid · · Score: 1

      The New Nipple Shoe. Feel the bounce.
      Will the next Nipple iPod commercial be censored?
      Goodbye, Apple Corp. trademark lawsuits!
      Hello, lawsuits from miscellaneous porn companies that also sell "videos" online!

    47. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In their country, that $2 might buy what $30 buys here in the USA. And if they started getting paid $10 an hour or whatever, then Nike would be FAR less profitable than it is, and it's stock would fall. If this happened to many companies, then the stock market would suffer - and then millions of old ladies and orphans would suffer too, because it is pension plans and endowments that depend on the stock market to provide a good return on investment - in order for people in need (old ladies and orphans for example) to be taken care of.

    48. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      In their country, that $2 might buy what $30 buys here in the USA. And if they started getting paid $10 an hour or whatever, then Nike would be FAR less profitable than it is, and it's stock would fall. If this happened to many companies, then the stock market would suffer - and then millions of old ladies and orphans would suffer too, because it is pension plans and endowments that depend on the stock market to provide a good return on investment - in order for people in need (old ladies and orphans for example) to be taken care of.

      I never said to pay them $10 per hour. Even $10 per day would be such an improvement if they are getting only $2 a day now. At some point you look at employment costs for the US versus overseas and then you add in the factor of shipping costs when most of these shoes are sold in the US and maybe some jobs come back over here. Yes profits suffer slightly and the stock will suffer temporarily, but eventually these jobs will add to GDP and HELP the economy of the United States. Less unemployment means less orphans on the street or Grandma's who do not get care.

    49. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >At some point you look at employment costs for the US versus overseas and then you add in the factor of shipping costs when most of these shoes are sold in the US and maybe some jobs come back over here.

      From what I've heard on the Discovery Channel, shipping costs usually make about 1% of the overall cost of items (shipped from China, etc).

      So if a pair of Nike's is sold for 50$US, the cost is probably 25$ at most, which means it costs 25 cents to get it shipped from China to the U.S.A. In an ideal world, americans would buy stuff made by americans, but in a free-trading world, it just doesn't work when you have people needing 10-20$US/hour jobs in the U.S.A. but people in China are well paid for only 2$US/hour.

      The ironic part is, an american invented the containers that lowered the overall shipping costs which makes overseas factories more than viable.

    50. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Let's see: part of your case is that "protesters" are wrong, because Nike pays better now. Why do you think they did that? Because protesters told what was happening, and Nike got a public relations black eye. SO they went and changed their policy. So the protesters helped the workers in those "sweatshops," didn't they? If there had been no protests, wages and working conditions would have been worse, wouldn't they?

      The other flaw in your argument is that these sweatshops are doing work that is no longer being done in the United States, once the mightiest manufacturing power in the world. What do we do now? Can we all own sweatshops?

      You know, Henry Ford had some crazy ideas, but one very good one was this: he raised all his worker's salaries to $5 a day, far above what other auto workers were getting. This way, he kept workers for a long time, and that gave him an advantage. Also, he got a bunch of workers who were rich enough to buy Fords. His competitors had to raise their wages, too, and THEY could buy Fords, though they couldn't afford what they made.

      National economies, no doubt, have to go through a low-wages period. It's called exploitation, or primitive accumulation. But what all these countries have to eventually deal with is this: the point of economic development is to develop their own populations, and if their workers can't afford to buy the goods they produce, they aren't doing it. Auto plants in Mexico exist where the workers live with no roads, no cars, maybe no electricity. This benefits the auto manufacturer, because they can sell at a lower price -- or maybe just take a bigger profit. But in doing that, they strip our economy of auto manufacturing, and they don't develop Mexico. This kind of employment in the Third World is the biggest reason why so many come north to work on our farms, in our restaurants, and so on.

  2. Why? by cephalien · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not to be a prude about this, but what exactly is the point? How much do regular pedometers cost?

    I know I've seen some for less than 30 bucks. Yeah, sure. There's the wow factor

    (hey, lookee at my over-priced Nikes. Did you know I spent 30 bucks more and they can talk to my iPod? -- wow, I've gone to the couch and back six times in the last hour, logging 50 steps!)

    But not much else. I love technology as much as the next person on /., but there's got to be a better use for it.

    --
    If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight? - George Carlin
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you easily sync a regular pedometer to a website to let you "compete" with a friend half a continent away? It's a fun little idea for people who enjoy running. There are better uses for those chips in your PlayStation, too, but not everything in life needs to have a serious use.

      This is actually very clever marketing. Not only will the novelty of it grab people's interest and the attention of the press, but it further cements Apple's position as a consumer-friendly gadget company. Love them or hate them, Apple has been making some brilliant moves over the last few years.

    2. Re:Why? by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1
      wow, I've gone to the couch and back six times in the last hour, logging 50 steps!

      I love technology as much as the next person on /., but there's got to be a better use for it.

      How about jogging?
      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    3. Re:Why? by dontEATnachos · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok, there is actually some cool stuff involved here.

      1) It's not just a pedometer ... if it's anything like the other Nike running gear, it actually uses an accelerometer and some other crazy stuff to figure out how far you're running. Instead of just saying that a single step = X number of feet it tries to figure out how far you really moved your foot.

      2) As others have mentioned, it actually reads the status to you so you don't have to look at your iPod as you run.

      3) Perhaps my favorite: Power Song activation. You can assign the middle button of the iPod to your power song. That way when you need that extra kick from a high energy song it's easy access. Once it's done playing, it goes back to your regular music.

      The only thing that would make this better would be if Nike wasn't so anti-GPS.

      --
      Hahahahahaha, what?
    4. Re:Why? by Basehart · · Score: 1

      I bought a Cat Eye computer for my bike yesterday and now they come out with this. I don't see any reason why someone can't introduce iPod based cycle computers at this point.

    5. Re:Why? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What would be very cool is if it would attempt to match the beats per minute of your song to your actual steps per minute, so you could run to music at whatever pace you wanted to. I think iTunes has a BPM field, so you could probably at least have the iPod choose songs that were close to your pace (so you could have different pump-up, running, and cool-down music), but I don't know if you can easily alter the playback speed of an MP3 without altering it's pitch to do exact cadence matching. I wonder if it has enough processor overhead to do on-the-fly resampling.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:Why? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      Why else do you think people jog?

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a runner you would know that your cadence should be more or less constant. Speed is controlled via stride length. Long stride means you need to move legs faster to maintain cadence and hence go faster. Close to 90 BPMS is consider ideal, it also is the tempo of AC/DC Back in Black.

    8. Re:Why? by rikkards · · Score: 1
      I bought a Cat Eye computer for my bike yesterday and now they come out with this. I don't see any reason why someone can't introduce iPod based cycle computers at this point.


      Might be that in a lot of places it is illegal to wear headphones while riding a bike (not that it stops people).
    9. Re:Why? by FLEB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who needs headphones? Duck tape, portable speakers...

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    10. Re:Why? by nolife · · Score: 1

      I've wondered about combination products like this in the past and I do not see the advantage. Here is an example..
      You can buy a string trimmer (weed whacker) that has a connection at the bottom that allows other sold seperately components to be attached, like a small saw, a lawn edger, a very small almost useless roto-tiller etc.. The problem is the attachments cost very close too and in some cases MORE a dedicated lawn edger, a small useless roto tiller and a small tree saw. I guess the advantage is one motor but that is also a very big disadvantage. If that one motor dies you lose everything and I can asure you that the next years model will be completely redesigned and not work with your existing attachments.
      On a smaller scale. Many kitchen mixers have a grinding attachment, great for grinding coffee beans, spices, etc. They start at a minimum of $30 depending on the mixer you have. I can by an electric coffee/spice grinder for $10 and all I have to do is plug it into the electrical outlet and go.
      What are the advantages of these types of products?

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    11. Re:Why? by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Your grinder attachment for mixers, assuming you mean KitchenAid, is either their meat grinder, fruit and vegetable grinder/strainer, or a grain mill. While you can use these accessories for coffee, its like buying a car to crack open walnuts.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    12. Re:Why? by nolife · · Score: 1

      I thought Kitchaid also had a specific high speed grinder attachment for coffee, nuts, and spices but obviously not.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    13. Re:Why? by Xyde · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The iPod can already do this for audiobooks, i assume it could be done for mp3 as well.

    14. Re:Why? by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Yea but I want my pedometer to also give me a groove techno beat in time with my steps!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    15. Re:Why? by Amiasian · · Score: 1

      Sure it does. I've been playing around with that sort of thing in Rockbox. Although it's more of a pitch changing thing than a tempo change - but I could see it as possible - and there's also the iPod's ability to change the pace of audiobooks.

  3. iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like a neat idea, but I'm waiting for the iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone.

    "This shoephone holds over 5 billion songs! ...
    Would you believe 10,000 songs and 5,000 ringtones?"

    1. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by pedalman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sounds like a neat idea, but I'm waiting for the iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone.
      Sorry, but you are years too late. From the following reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell_Smart

      "Perhaps the most recognisable 'gag' from the show was Maxwell Smart's shoe phone, which has become somewhat of a comic icon: Smart would communicate with CONTROL using a rotary-dialled telephone concealed in his shoe, similar to a modern cell phone. While such a device was decades ahead of its time in real life, the need to take off his shoe to use it and the loud bell among other design flaws lead to various humorously awkward situations."

      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    2. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by AndyG314 · · Score: 0

      Wasn't there a Shoe Phone in Get Smart?

      --
      If it's dead, you killed it.
    3. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOSH.

    4. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by dancpsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, when I first read the headline, I thought Apple was doing some mobile DDR with shoe accelerometers connected to the iPod.

      --
      "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
    5. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Funny

      *whoosh*

      talk about missing the joke.

      Would you believe fifty security guards and a bloodhound?

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    6. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Dhar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Missed the joke by THAT much! *holds up almost-touching fingers*

      -g.

    7. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      WHOOSH.

      I'm sorry, but shouldn't that be "swoosh"?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    8. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Actually, when I first read the headline, I thought Apple was doing some mobile DDR with shoe accelerometers connected to the iPod.

      Hmm, I wonder how long before someone actually creates a DDR IDv3 extension for MP3?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    9. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pure speculation. All Apple + Nike development has until now been under the Cone of Silence.

    10. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      That moist "splat" sound was the joke hitting you in the forehead. Go get a washcloth.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      *whoosh*

      I think you mean *swoosh*

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by yabos · · Score: 1

      There's always at least ONE person who's head a joke completly goes over.

    13. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by fak3r · · Score: 1

      Shoe phone? "Missed it by, that much!" (anyone get that one?)

    14. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Baricom · · Score: 1

      It's the old intentionally-misunderstood-punchline-to-start-a-f lamewar trick.

    15. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone get that one?

      No.

    16. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      All Apple + Nike development has until now been under the Cone of Silence.

      So, in other words, it's all over the rumor sites then? (-;

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    17. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by fak3r · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I suspect no one here is over 35 then...

      http://www.wouldyoubelieve.com/

  4. I'm scared... by Miaomiao · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is so going to trap those joggers nearby in their own little worlds. Running in circles all day long, running, running, running.

    So can we at least attach some speakers too so they sound interesting as they jog by?

    On a serious note... why do I have a weird feeling sales on "We are the Champions" are going to go up...

    1. Re:I'm scared... by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      "We are the Champions" or any of the Rocky music: "Eye of the Tiger" and those ones

  5. Please remove your shoes.... by iXiXi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you imagine these at the airport?

    1. Re:Please remove your shoes.... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is an entertaining concern...

      First, I doubt you'll make it through the metal/bomb detector with them. So you'll have to stick them on the conveyor belt. Imagine the reaction from the TSA person when they see the X-Ray of your shoes. I'd allow at least another 45 minutes to get to your gate.

      Also, what happens when your transmitter interferes with the airplane's navigation radios?

    2. Re:Please remove your shoes.... by cnettel · · Score: 1

      That's why you should stay seated during take-off and landing.

    3. Re:Please remove your shoes.... by dhollist · · Score: 1

      Don't be so sure about the 45 minute delay. I teach a technical course and recently had to take one of my "props" to Chicago with me. Since this particilar prop is diesel fuel fired auxiliary heater, you would think it would be hugely problematic. As such, I had a box and packing material ready in case I needed to pack it up and check it into the cargo hold or have them hold it at the airport for me. While it did raise some eyebrows at the X-ray machine it didn't slow me down more than 3-5 minutes.

      I was relieved that they inspected it closely, swabbed it for explosives, and questioned me about it before letting me proceed. It made me feel better about their scrutiny of other stuff people might be trying to get onto planes.

      Before I get lambasted, I should note that the fuel fired auxiliary heater in question has NEVER had fuel in it, and is a cutaway model, so you can see inside it to verify that it is clean and non-functional.

    4. Re:Please remove your shoes.... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      They''ll certainly come up as a threat on a xray scanner until TSA screeners become accustom to seeing stuff like this. However, they'll simply run an ED trace on them , they'll come up negative, and you'll be on your way.

      Actually, in a 2 years most major airports are going to get rid of xray scanners in favor of much more sophisticated explosives detection machines. Screeners will automatically know whether or not something like this is a bomb or not.... so you won't need to be pulled aside.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  6. I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interface by JudgeFurious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put your iPod in a clear transparent (and waterproof, just to be safe) case that adds a wireless connector which then uses Bluetooth to talk to your toilet seat. While you pinch a loaf it weighs you, takes your temperature, scans your dump as it passes the "sensor ring", and gives you helpful dietary suggestions along with playing a preset song that you've associated with one of a half-dozen air freshener options.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  7. Big feet? by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brings new meaning to the question, "You know what they say about men with big feet, don't you?"

    Big hard drives!

    Thank you, I'll be here all week.

    1. Re:Big feet? by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 1
      "Big hard drives!"
      Nah, it'll be all gone in a flash.

      --
      sig? Oh, that sig...
    2. Re:Big feet? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Big hard drives!

      Yeah, but they're talking about the nano, in which case it would be "no hard drive." : o

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Big feet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u r a fag

    4. Re:Big feet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having rather wide and fairly long feet myself, I've always assumed the correct answer to be "...has a helluva hard time finding comfy shoes"

  8. Brilliant by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the low low price of 99 cents a mile, you can use these fancy running shoes with built-in music. If you stop paying, they break your legs. The RIAA will love it!

  9. I disagree wholeheartedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disagree vehemently with this behavior

  10. Ha, they're just jealous of the Steve Austin shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Got 250 dollars burning a hole in your pocket?
    These Adidas have a computer onboard that changes the shoes rigidity and bounce depending on how hard the terrain is and how fast your moving. AND if you jump they make that Steve Austin 'WHOOOSH' jumping sound and allow you to leap tall buildings in a single bound!

    Hurray for science!

  11. Didn't the old iPods have this feature? by Quaoar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, they had a pedometer...running 5000 steps with a first-gen iPod would cause the hard drive to fail... :)

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:Didn't the old iPods have this feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I have to say I did chuckle at your post, I used my first-gen ipod for jogging for the best part of 2 years before retiring it. It still works fine to this day, just a tad scratched and a slightly lagging battery life!

  12. Special Shoes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Boy, when I saw that "Special Shoes" link I thought for sure I was going to see this!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Special Shoes by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Mamma always said you could tell a lot about a person from their shoes.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Special Shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you KFG!

  13. Price too low by Captain+Perspicuous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A supersmall step sensor for your shoe with wireless transmitter, a wireless receiver, iPod integration, timer, text-to-speach interface, "booster song with 1 keypress", recording all your trips and comparing them over the internet, and Apple and Nike behind it - I was expecting that gear to cost at least $50 to $80, and I'm pretty sure the people that are interested would have paid that amount without thinking about it - but only $29? That is one seriously low price. Wow, what happened, are they subsidizing this one or something?

    And if they do, how do they make sure we are buying nike shoes? That step counter can be taped to any shoe, can't it?

    1. Re:Price too low by kevinvh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read the fine print on bottom of the "rock n' run page".. it says:

          The sensor's battery is not replaceable. Battery life will vary
          considerably based on use and other factors.

      So the $64M question is, how long does the sensor's battery last?
      This could explain the low price.. $29 may be cheap, but if you're
      buying a new sensor every year, suddenly it's getting expensive.

    2. Re:Price too low by reldruH · · Score: 0

      Where did you read about this text-to-speech interface? I RTFA and I didn't see anything about it. Link?

      --
      I've always pictured the color of OS zealotry as a sort of bright flamingo pinkish hue
    3. Re:Price too low by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I think the sensor is integrated in the Nike shoes, you just buy the 29$ antenna and battery-powered transmitter. Since the battery is non-replaceable (and they don't bother recycling kinetic energy - philistines!), you end up buying another 29$ antenna every time the battery dies, I'm guessing at least once per season.

      Then of course you're paying a premium for the "special" Nike shoes with the sensor. Hell, you're already paying a premium for ordinary Nike shoes, big whoop!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:Price too low by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      The cheapest shoes cost $85. How long do you think they last?

    5. Re:Price too low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The guy gets voice feedback during his run in the ad ("your average pace is seven fifteen"):
      http://www.nike.com/nikeplus/

      "Hit the ground running with workout-based voice feedback"
      http://www.apple.com/ipod/nike/gear.html

      "Voice feedback"
      http://www.apple.com/ipod/nike/run.html

    6. Re:Price too low by Smurf · · Score: 1
      Where did you read about this text-to-speech interface? I RTFA and I didn't see anything about it. Link?

      In one of the pages they talk about voice feedback. I guess that's what the parent meant. (By the way, the "Voice feedback" tag is a link to a pseudo-demo of the feature.)
    7. Re:Price too low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The sensor is not integrated into the shoes. And there is not a seperate antenna. Just take a look at one of the pictures that are floating around. The Nike shoes have a hole that the sensor drops into. You could probably put the sensor into a non-Nike shoe, but you'ld have to do some exacto knife work to the shoe first.

    8. Re:Price too low by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      but only $29? That is one seriously low price. Wow, what happened, are they subsidizing this one or something?

      Based on this I assume what we have here is an off-the-shelf wireless mouse circuit. When you're running it's doing "click click click click click", and the iPod end might even be the USB connector for the mouse. So, $29 is in the ballpark for a COTS wireless mouse, plus you don't have to build any of the rest of the mouse other than the left-click button. Somebody gets the "elegant, simple" award.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Price too low by Pleb'a.nz · · Score: 1

      Kenetic energy, watches have been using this for years to keep them going. Why can't they use a bit more thinking, sell it for a bit more and it'll never run out of energy! It's not like you need to use it when you're not running. I'm sure the shock of weight being transfered and then hitting ground is enough to put a spark in your step.

    10. Re:Price too low by edibleplastic · · Score: 1

      I just took a look at the site again and on this page it says that the battery in the shoe sensor isn't replaceable. That might have something to do with it. It could also be because the shoe alone will cost you $90.

    11. Re:Price too low by Stardo · · Score: 0

      A reasonably good pair of running shoes might last 3 to 6 months for a serious runner, which is the target demographic I assume this is marketed towards.

      You are right, however, that the battery life is a serious concern, both for serious runners and for the casual runners who might pick this up because it looks cool.

    12. Re:Price too low by Java+Ape · · Score: 1
      SHHHH! This is the next step in Bush's illegal surveillance of his subjects, er citizens. They've gotten all the auto manufacturers in include GPS tracking capability, but it's hard to tell exactly who's riding in a given car. Working with major footwear manufacturers, they're now going to low-jack your shoes! The low price-point is OBVIOUSLY to encourage millions of Americans to buy them, and the "pedometer" function, like on-Star, is a moderately-useful public interface to convince the people to buy.

      Not that I'm paranoid - but I'm pretty sure George Bush is really a robot. He's the latest attempt by Pinky and the Brain to take over the world. Brain is obviously running the Robot (and I've seen better animatronics), so Pinky has to do the talking - just listen to his speeches and it all becomes clear!

    13. Re:Price too low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think again. That little "bullet" contains an accelerometer. If it's just counting steps, then the distance won't be accurate at all since it depends on the length of the steps. Jobs claimed that it is 90+% accurate in measuring the distance.

      They also ran into a problem because for Nike, the size was too big to fit inside the shoe and for Apple, the size was too small to fit in all the tech. The current size is the result of the compromise. If it's a clicker only, it won't take much space and won't pose a problem.

    14. Re:Price too low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you could buy your prefered brand and a small cutter, then bore a hole in one of your shoes to fit in the sensor. Just hope that when you do that, you won't go all the way through or that the shoe doesn't continue to degrade after the cutting. Or you could buy an oversized shoes and put the bullet in the gap between the toes and the shoes. Or duct tape it, hoping that it won't fall off and get stepped on or lost.

      There is nothing to prevent you from using it with non-Nike shoes since the "bullet" itself contains the accelerometer (not a step counter), the battery and the wireless circuits. You pay for the piviledge of having Nike make a little hole in the shoes. The alternatives above are too inconvenient and that's what Nike bets on.

      Perhaps they patent the hole in the shoe to prevent other brands from using it? :) :)
      Patent lawyer: Yes, I'd like to submit a patent on the behalf of my client, Nike.
      Patent clerk: OK, everything seems to be in order. Now let see what the patent is about.
      [5 seconds later]
      Patent clerk: Hahahahahahah *drops on the floor, rolls around* hahahahaha *wipe away the tears* hahahahaha. Stop it, my stomach hurts!! hahahahha *cough, cough* hahahha.
      [30 minutes later]
      Patent clerk: Alright, I think I get it. Your client is applying for a patent for a hole design. Come back in one year. Hahahahahahah.

      [One year later]
      Patent clerk: Your application to patent a hole is approved. Congrats.

  14. Look at me! I'm cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Apple products and wear Nikes!!!

    Apple : the new MTV.

  15. Maybe not just for Running? Hack the Accelerometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like the Nike accelerometer and wireless interface could be hacked to do something else other that act as a pedometer.

    The website says "sensitive accelerometer". Could it be sensitive enough (and updated frequently enough) to be used as a seismometer (detect earthquakes)?

    There have to be other interesting uses for this, although this really seems like a sweet little application. Making use of the processing and storage power of the ipod that lots of runners already use is really very clever.

  16. You don't need Nike+ shoes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nike+ shoes have a pocket under the insole for the sensor to fit, but you could just as easily attach it to the laces of your current shoes. Something I plan on doing with my Adidas shoes.

  17. Nike + Apple by i+am+kman · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if they really joined forces, they'd need a new name. Hmmmm, let's see, something like: Nike + Apple = Nipple.

    Yeah, I'd definitely buy one of those! Maybe two.

    1. Re:Nike + Apple by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      That Nipple is superfluous.

    2. Re:Nike + Apple by Microsift · · Score: 1

      So, Apple has already done this with the fourth generation iPod, the color scheme of the scroll wheel was changed to make it resemble a nipple.

      --
      My other sig is extremely clever...
    3. Re:Nike + Apple by Smurf · · Score: 1
      And if they really joined forces, they'd need a new name. Hmmmm, let's see, something like: Nike + Apple = Nipple.

      Yeah, I read on Slashdot that they make great human interfaces...
    4. Re:Nike + Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOT FUNNY!!!

      I would have thought better of the proprietor of......

      http://www.seenonslash.com/

    5. Re:Nike + Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the picture of the jogger on the Apple+Nike page? I think they have that covered already.

  18. no way! by basic0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Corporations like Apple and Nike promoting their brands through a synergystic crossover product? Get out of here! Next thing you'll tell me that they're going to get professional athletes and rock stars to promote this thing.

  19. obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Bigger shoes than New Balance. And wireless. Cool!

  20. Meh by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

    The idea seems like a gimick to sell more on itms (look at all the sport mixes and crap they talk about on the Sync page). But going passed that, it would be cool to see what people can do with the 2.4ghz wireless adapter. I can't really forsee where that might go, but I am sure someone will think of something truely fun to do with it.

    One last note... Why are they releasing this? iTunes 6.0.5 isnt out yet, and you can't buy the kit to hook up your shoes and iPod for a bit longer.

    --
    Scott Swezey
    1. Re: Meh by i+am+kman · · Score: 1

      Fortunately I had my handy l337 speak converter handy to translate your handle:

      http://www.brenz.net/l337Maker.asp

      Pretty cool, eh? Now I can 74L| with the best of them.

      50, \/\/|-|0'$ (00L |\|0\/\/ /\/\07|-|3r PhU(|3r?

    2. Re: Meh by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

      4LL /\/\'/ b4535 r b3L0|\|9 70 j00Z

      --
      Scott Swezey
  21. Re:Please remove your shoes... but on planes..... by dreadlocks · · Score: 1

    these days you're likely to get your ass tackled if you're seen fooling with your shoes and plugging stuff into them.

  22. Integration by AAeyers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This must be part of the wireless patents Apple filed for a while back. I would not at all be surprised if this idea of wireless integration gets incorporated into more and more things. Imagine if you could carry your ipod with you all day and have it work automatically with your home stereo, shoes, car, etc. The ipod could become much more than an mp3 player, and could help collect data (pedometer, etc) and stream music to different sources automatically.

    This seems like exactly the thing Jobs and Apple would pursue, a seamless system of wireless integration would perfectly embody their philosophies of style, power, simplicity, and having things 'just work'. It may be just a new shoe accessory right now, but I for one could see this type of technology evolving into new areas

    --
    "For Great Justice."
  23. Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by MBraynard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Pedometers do not cut it for distance measurement. Almost everyone uses a GPS unit these days. Interestingly enough, the only company still pushing a pedometer-driven system these days is Nike. At SOME point they are going to get on the GPS bandwagon but I'm uncertain why they are taking so long to get 'cutting edge in this area.'

    OT - That banner ad for Crystal Reports just brought my computer to a crawl.

    1. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm quite fond of my Polar Accelerometer which has proven to be amazingly accurate and also works on canopied tree runs, something gps has issues with.

      http://www.polar.fi/speed_distance/

    2. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by cheinonen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To myself, who I'd consider to be a reasonably serious athlete, I prefer the food pods to GPS for a few reasons. They're typically smaller, but most importantly, they aren't automatically destroyed by large buildings or tree cover. Living in areas where I would run on trails surrounded by large trees, or in downtown with large buildings, I would constantly lose GPS signals and so my distance, pace, and maps of my runs would be way off in areas. The foot pods can be calibrated by you on a track to make them accurate to your stride, and are +/- 1% after doing that typically, which is better than my GPS was by far. Now they have downsides as well (elevation gain typically isn't measured), but they're better than losing signal for some of us.

    3. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While there are several GPS system out there to measure speed and distance, I believe the system from Polar is superior in a couple of ways. First, it uses acceleration data from a pod on the foot to calculate speed and distance so you can run in a tunnel or indoors and still get data. Secondly, it's much lower power, thus you don't have to swap out batteries on a weekly or even monthly basis. The advantage of using GPS is you can map where you've been but none of the moderately priced running products offer any sort of mapping feature.

    4. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, pedometers are more effective for figuring calorie consumption, particularly if they had included a pulse sensor (which they didn't, so I'm not buying it).

    5. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Phillup · · Score: 1

      I've got a Garmin Forerunner.

      Love it.

      Absolutely useless when I train in the winter on my treadmill...

      I *will* be looking into this bit of kit, thank you very much.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    6. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by barthrh2 · · Score: 1

      Do you think that this is the same as the inertial foot pods? I hesitate to say so. The initial pods from Polar are about $150. The HRM Watch + footpod from Nike is over $300.

      If this is an inertial pod-- or merely a transmitter for one embedded into the shoe -- then it's a fantastic deal (depending on the cost of the shoe). The quoted price is only $29. If it's just a pedometer, then it's pretty useless.

      I always that that it would be great to integrate HRM and iPod. Spoken stats (easier than trying to read your wrist while running) or music that changes based on pace would be so cool.

    7. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because your treamill can't tell you exactly how far/fast you are going.

    8. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by fupeg · · Score: 1

      Serious runners don't wear Nikes anyways. Their main audience are people who want to wear "running" shoes with their jeans, not people running 20+ miles per week.

    9. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      And the pod jsut works great when I hop on my bike.

    10. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Moofie · · Score: 1

      None of them? Really?

      *looks at photo of marathon runners*

      You might not like them, and I might not like them, but that doesn't exactly make your point, does it?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      No, actually, I have tried many brands and for me, Nike's the very best. Countless races, including 4 marathons and an Ironman. And try 50+ miles per week, thanks.

      Right now I do most runs in 2:40s and have two pair of discontinued Air Zoom spiridons (one for tris, one for road races).

    12. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      from the linked website:
      The Sport Kit allows your Nike+ shoe to talk to your iPod nano. The sensor uses a sensitive accelerometer to measure your activity, then wirelessly transfers this data to the receiver on your iPod nano.

      and:
      The sensor's battery is not replaceable. Battery life will vary considerably based on use and other factors.
    13. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT - That banner ad for Crystal Reports just brought my computer to a crawl.

      Compared to the actual program (VS2005 Pro) the ads are nothing.

    14. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by elhaf · · Score: 1

      The apple website does confirm that this is an accelerometor and not a mere pedometer. Pedometer's can be as simple as a pendulum swinging back and forth to check your number of steps.

      --
      Six score characters.
      Brevity being wit's soul
      I have enough space.
    15. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Phillup · · Score: 1

      Ever done intervals?

      Ever want to compare interval workouts?

      Doing this with data collected from my Forerunner is pretty easy.

      Doing it with data from a treadmill... not so easy.

      I'm not interested in one after-the-fact average value. I want data... lots and lots of data!

      If this thing can give me time based velocity data, I'm all over it.

      Since it is using an accelerometer... if it could give me time marks for each "step"... that would be ideal. I'll manipulate that kind of data myself to come up with everything I want to know.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    16. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True- Simple pedometers do NOT measure distance accurately, but you've got your facts wrong there. Lots of companies are "still" using inertial sensors to create very accurate speed and distance monitoring products, and the list is growing.

      Ever hear of Polar or Suunto?

      Seriously, they use inertial sensors for their products, which is not low-tech side by the way.

      GPS is simply unsuitable for a lot of real-world training situations, including urban canyons, heavily treed areas, or anywhere else you don't have line-of-sight to enough GPS satelites.

      Check yo facts!

    17. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious athletes might want to wait and see the outcome of adidas partnership with Polar.

      http://www.adidas-polar.com/

    18. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

      I have both a foretrex and a forerunner. I didn't buy the mapsource from garmin. I use GPSutility and some other stuff to read it the raw coordinates and then display them with Delorme's TopoUsa. I had purchased TopoUSA years before I got the ForeRunner. You can map your tracks without any commerical software by taking screen shots from google maps - but I don't think you're gonna be real happy with the results. If I was trying to set it all up today I think I would just get the MapSource from Garmin. The whole deal would be about $250(150 for the GPS and 100 for the software).

    19. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by jchernia · · Score: 1

      Even better than using your own GPS is using Google's

      http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/

      GREAT site for calculating run distances.

    20. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by raddan · · Score: 1

      I second that. I was really excited to try out my new Garmin, but after what I figured was about a 12 mile run, it said 4.7. WTF? I was expecting more accuracy. Following all the hints about getting better reception in the woods (where I do most of my runs) doesn't help much either. I have a cheapo pedometer that I'm planning on calibrating on a track now.

  24. Re:desperation by GundamFan · · Score: 1

    I have 5 iPods in my left shoe alone... speek for your self.

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
  25. Apple does no evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...by linking up with one of the most evil corporations on the face of the earth, the manufacturers of the jackboot in the uniform of globalisation.

  26. Theme song! by mbadolato · · Score: 1

    Quick! Get Flock of Seagulls out of 80's One (2?) Hit Wonder Purgatory!

    "And iRan, iRan so far away"

  27. Nah, I think it's a pretty shrewd move. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On both their parts. While joggers might not be a huge percentage of total mp3 player sales, I'd bet almost everyone who jogs anymore either has or plans to buy one. Apple may have just swallowed them all up. The data tracking function is probably a much bigger deal to those types than lardasses like er.. us realize. Nike gets to sell people another pair of overpriced shoes (probably moreso than usual) and horn in on Apple's brand recognition. Nike might be big in the shoe racket, but those Nike branded Phillips players didn't exactly take the world by storm.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  28. I think by j2crux · · Score: 1

    That's awesome! Honestly it might make ME start running ;).

    --
    j^2
  29. i- SHEWWWW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gazoontight

  30. Never ask a slashdotter their opinion on exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdotters are so keen and cutting edge when dealing with all things tech, except when it has to do with exercise. Do most of you realize that Garmin sells gps devices that link with 3 different satellites for the express purpose of tracking someone's mph and total miles run? Can you believe people are willing to spend $300 on a device that does this?

  31. Sync Capabilities by AgentOJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looking at the links on Apple's site, it shows that the run data can also be synced with your computer once you get back from the run. The data includes stuff like speed, distance, calories burned, etc, so you can see your progress over a length of time. As a former cross country and track runner, this is the kind of information that we had to calculate manually (well, at least record the numbers and then crunch them) to get an overall view of our progress and goals. Also, it would be cool to have since I'd already be bringing my iPod on a run, and wouldn't need to bring a seperate electronic pedometer along (and I'd be willing to be the electronic pedometers out there that track the same information and sync with a computer don't work with Macs).

    1. Re:Sync Capabilities by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I’ve long envisioned a system where the armband I wear at the gym has sensors woven into it that connect to the iPod. It would take my pulse and blood pressure and have the iPod speak the important numbers and stats to me over the headphones.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:Sync Capabilities by ironring2006 · · Score: 1
      Funny that this just came out because it sounds a lot like a system I dreamt up just the other day while at the gym. I thought it was such a great idea that I wanted to develop it, patent it, and sell it. But given that as with any great idea, it's probably already been thought of and patented and there's no real way for the little guy like me to actually make money off of it, it got relegated to just another snippet in my head, so I'll just post my idea here and let it enter the public domain.

      What I pictured was not just a system for runners, but for all exercise enthusiasts who do cross training on anything from treadmills to bikes to steppers and elliptical trainers in addition to regular jogging. At first I pictured a small device the size of a memory key (this would be the moneymaking device), but then figured that it would probably make sense to just add functionality to an iPod through a firmware update or something since they seem to be the exercise must have accessory.

      Anyway, each exercise machine could have either an iPod dock, or just a wireless transmitter that communicated with the person's iPod. Depending on the machine type, different data would be recorded, such as speed, incline, resistance level, etc but similar machines would have the same headings (picture an XML style open data format). This would be important in gyms where they may have multiple machines of the same kind. Anyway, this data could be aggregated with a heart rate monitor attachment that got a sync signal either from the machine, or a GPS timestamp.

      But the beauty in the whole system would be the seamless integration that the iPod hardware does so well with iTunes, like what the parent stated. Each workout would be saved, then synced with your computer upon plugging it in, click on "Workouts" in iTunes and have each workout listed with details. Change the view to then show graphs of progress of various parameters that you want displayed, such as total miles this week, total calories, average metabolic rate, etc. So, I guess my idea isn't really different than what Apple is working towards, its just that I'd like to see this functionality extended to other exercise machines for cross-training. Of course, this would involve the equipment manufacturers getting on board and adding support, but if they can do it for cars, I think exercise machines are yet another niche they can expand to.

      Although I'm not a jogger, I do plenty of other cardio exercise and this is something that I would enjoy and satisfy the number quantification reassurance that my Engineering personality requires. But the overall interface shouldn't require an engineering or computer science degree to use. It shouldn't be anymore difficult than selecting "Workout" on your iPod, hit record, hit stop, and then plug n play in your computer when you get home. I think it would be a great way to stay motivated as you can track your progress, see improvements, or even instill guilt upon oneself when you look at a large dip in your graph where you slacked off for a week.

  32. Sexy Female Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regular pedometers don't talk to you in a sexy female voice that encourages you to keep going. Plus, it syncs online to a database so you can compare / contrast to other users. Or if boasting isn't your thing, you can download your data onto the computer for use in charting your progress.

    Its actually quite ingenious, and very well priced.

  33. We need a waterproof Triathalon iPod iShoe by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That won't short out when you do the swimming portion.

    And, has anyone thought of having it make your shoes shuffle when you set the iPod on "shuffle"?

    Nike: Just Do It But First Pay Money

    Seriously, though, as a former marathon runner (2 hr 29 minutes back when the world record was 2 hr 14 minutes), I question the practical utility of an integrated shoe to iPod link - sure, it's nice to know your approximate pedometer rating, but in reality that is not a real number, only an estimation based on your running stride and (more likely) walking stride - pedometers tend to fail when you are in hill climb and downhill portions.

    One would be better served by a GPS integrated iPod that has a calculator function that tells you your literal pace, infers heartrate from a standard external monitor, and shows comparison timings from when you do a fast run at increased speed for a shorter practice run as a goal setter, and possibly uses the iPod music interface to tell you useful information such as:

    1. 20 miles to go!
    2. take a drink of water soon (elapsed time indicates thirst)
    3. you are running at/above/below peak training speed (based on prior training or estimated speeds)
    4. hill coming up, duration 2 miles (based on GPS readings and the route/map you gave)
    5. only 4 miles to go! (as you get further on)

    And so on.

    But none of that has anything to do with a shoe. You're far better off with a watch/GPS that connects to your iPod.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:We need a waterproof Triathalon iPod iShoe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be really neat and I'd buy one but for one small problem:

      1. You're sitting on your ass.
      2. You're still sitting on your ass.
      3. Oh my god! You're getting up and walking...to...the refrigerator. O frabjous day.
      4. And now you're sitting on your ass again.

    2. Re:We need a waterproof Triathalon iPod iShoe by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      yeah, but if you could program it to play music you like when you do run, and ok music when you walk, and really bad music when you sit down, then it might work for you ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:We need a waterproof Triathalon iPod iShoe by Draknor · · Score: 1

      3. you are running at/above/below peak training speed (based on prior training or estimated speeds)

      Ooo -- and when you start walking (which is likely to happen for non-serious runners like me), it could yell (in the infamous Quake voice) "HUMILATION!"

      =)

  34. Re:Look at me! I'm cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A guy walks up to me and asks, "What's Macintosh?" I show him my Quadra 840av and say "That's Macintosh." So he runs out, he buys a shiny new Mac mini, and he comes back and says "That's Macintosh?" and I say "No, that's trendy!"

  35. $30 For That??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only slightly better than paying $30 for this!!! The most ridiculous expenditure I think I have ever seen.

  36. Nike Sucks... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I would have to wait until New Balance comes out with one. A 13 4D Wide is kinda of hard to come by.

    1. Re:Nike Sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think anybody else had freaky feet like I do 9.5 4D here. Have not been able to get Nike shoes on my feet, well ever, New Balance all the way!

      Up side is that my wife thinks my feet are cute like the Flintstones

    2. Re:Nike Sucks... by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Nike actually makes some models up to 15 4E. If you've got a neutral gait, it's worth looking at. If you're an overpronator, you're probably out of luck as far as Nikes go.

    3. Re:Nike Sucks... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      My problem is my left foot is slightly wider than my right foot. It's a bit of a challenge to find one that's wide enough to accomodate the left foot while being able to support the right foot. New Balance has been very consistent for me over the years. I usually go with Red Wings shoes for special occasions and Sears work boots when I need a steel toe for the job.

  37. Sexy Female Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regular pedometers don't talk to you in a sexy female voice that encourages you to keep going. Plus, it syncs online to a database so you can compare / contrast to other users. Or if boasting isn't your thing, you can download your data onto the computer for use in charting your progress.

    Its actually quite ingenious, and very well priced.

  38. Bad joke. by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

    iShoe!

    Bless you.

    -Grey

  39. glavin! by MrSquirrel · · Score: 0, Troll

    What happens when you combine and overpriced media player with an overpriced shoe? MAGIC! Oh, wait... I meant to say HORRIBLE CONCEPTS. Pedometers are cheap, media players are expensive (specifically overpriced iPods), and Nike makes poor-quality overly-costly shoes. Even if it wasn't an iPod -- let's say it was a universal mp3 player adapter for your shoes... I'm not going to stick an expensive and fragile electronic device IN MY SMELLY SHOES (maybe if they were loafers, but this is suppossed to be for excercise!)! Come on Apple, what happened to your pizazz! Shoes + mp3 player?... I would expect this kind of CRAP from Sony, but not you. You've changed Apple, you've changed.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    1. Re:glavin! by mottie · · Score: 1

      RTFA, or even the 2 line summary...

      A $30 antenna will connect an iPod nano with special shoes to provide pedometer functions."

  40. stupid.. or is it? by mottie · · Score: 1

    At first this sounded absolutely retarded to me.. then after thinking about it I saw potential uses. If the iPod can be smart enough to see when you start to slow down, or where your "problem areas" are when jogging compared to previous runs (I don't jog, so who knows if these things exist) if it can modify your random selections to play something with faster tempo, it might be worthwhile.. likewise if it can slow things down on your cool down..

  41. iPod-Shoe Integration: The logical next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so funny.

  42. Re:Price too low, where is the catch? by guidryp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only ones I see.

    The sensor is meant to integrate in Nike shoes.
    The sensor doesn't have changeable batteries.

    I am sure you can figure out some way to attach to non nikes, unless I read this wrong and ceartian shoes come with embeded sensor.

    Batter is a concern until they tell us how long it lasts. If three years then what the heck...

  43. Re:Look at me! I'm cool! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0

    A guy walks up to me and asks, "What's a copy-paste troll?" I show him "How do I run Quake 3 in Linux?" and say "That's a copy-paste troll." So he runs out, he buys a shiny new parent post, and he comes back and says "That's a copy-paste troll?" and I say "No, that's--oh wait, that's a copy-paste troll as well. So yes."

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  44. When they build the pedometer into the shoe... by LaughingElk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it will become known as "The sole that times men's tries".

    (sorry)

    1. Re:When they build the pedometer into the shoe... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      This sunshine patriot wishes he had some modpoints.

  45. The Commercial That Explains Everything: by Shuh · · Score: 1
  46. Sheesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they get this interface to work with Waterskis as well as I think it's time for the iPod to jump over a shark.

    1. Re:Sheesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA mod parent up!

  47. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1

    Done, done, and done!

    Buy an iToilet!

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

  48. From the Article by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The original location for the player holster had to be moved when testers kept referring to it as the 'iPud.' "

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  49. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would sell in Japan.

  50. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    You joke, but I'm pretty sure some of those crazy Japanese electro-toilets do stuff like this. Maybe they analyze your urine and not your -- as you so delicately put it -- "loaf." If they don't actually exist, then someone was seriously considering making one, because the article I read (this was at least a year or so ago) was quite serious in tone.

    I wonder how people would feel about being told they're pregnant by their toilet?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  51. Think Different my ass by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Informative
    Says the BBC: "Although 60% of factories monitored achieved an A or B rating in terms of compliance with agreed standards, a quarter of factories were found to present more serious problems.
    These ranged from a lack of basic terms of employment and excessive hours of work to unauthorised sub-contracting, confirmed physical or sexual abuse and the existence of conditions which could lead to death or serious injury."

    Cool. That means as of 13 April, 2005 only in 40% of the factories used by Nike workers face a lack of basic terms of employment and excessive hours of work, unauthorised sub-contracting, confirmed physical or sexual abuse and the existence of conditions which could lead to death or serious injury. I'm off to by a pair of Nikes.
    Seriously, this is the first major goof since Steve Jobs came back to Apple.

    1. Re:Think Different my ass by Dynedain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How does a quarter of factories equal 40%?

      Now, while I agree that the sweatshops of the kind used by almost every overseas manufacturer is despicable, your twisting of the argument by fudging the numbers doesn't help your case. Remember, "C" is considered an average rating. If 60% of their factories are above average, thats pretty good. And only 25% fall into the "serious problems" category. That means that 15% are in the average range. If anything, Nike should be commended for making such a turn-around from their historic sweatshop past, and for having the guts to publish this kind of information about themselves. You can't go from horrible to perfect overnight. Lets see how they improve the bad factories in the future.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:Think Different my ass by thedletterman · · Score: 1

      Cool, apparently you are halfway to reading comprehension. From your pasted article: "a quarter of factories were found to present more serious problems. These ranged from a lack of basic terms of employment and excessive hours of work to unauthorised sub-contracting, confirmed physical or sexual abuse and the existence of conditions which could lead to death or serious injury." To your response to your article: "Cool. That means as of 13 April, 2005 only in 40% of the factories used by Nike..." Lst I checked, a quarter was 25% not 40%. Not that I'm a Nike fanboy (I don't own any Nike equipment or apparel) or condone sexual assault or anything, but in an annual period having a worker in a factory working an 80 hour week, someone report sexual harrassment, 'unauthorized' subcontracting (what's the problem with that one?), or having too many plugs in a receptacle isn't a horrible situation, nor does Nike deserve a diminished reputation for these things, because I hardly think they "allow" them to happen. The sexual harrassment DOES get reported, the subcontracting is "unauthorized", the hazardous conditions ARE identified (and presumably corrected).

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  52. Another toy for the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An abundance of add-on gadgets, and still no FM Tuner. Talk about thinking different.

    1. Re:Another toy for the list by supasam · · Score: 0

      I have an apple fm tuner for my ipod, have you checked up yet? Now I can turn off all my lovingly hand picked music and turn up the commercial feces that constitutes todays radio offerings!! Commercials and dumbass college fanboys here i come!! Fortunately Apple has manages to package the thing in a sweet remote control setup which prevents me from having to dig in my pocket for my ipod and my phone when I get a call.

      --


      Suck a lemon?
  53. OMG PONIES by AcgiGlyph · · Score: 0

    I was actually expecting this to be some kind of Post April 1st /. post but I don't see any OMG PONIES info.

  54. Effective advertising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can try all you want to convince me that they accidentally caught that chick mid-stride... But we'll both know that you don't believe it.

  55. Pedometer + Audiophile = ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pedo-phile?

    1. Re:Pedometer + Audiophile = ??? by ickoonite · · Score: 1

      hehe

      But there, American spelling simplification lets you down. As I am sure you are aware, elsewhere it is spelt paedophile, from the Greek paido; the pedo in pedometer comes from the Latin for foot.

      But still, I managed a chortle.

      iqu :P

    2. Re:Pedometer + Audiophile = ??? by Lars83 · · Score: 1

      Funny you used the word "chortle"...which was made up by the author Lewis Carroll.

  56. Why not a charger by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

    Kind of disappointing, I was expecting a shoe-based charger. _That_ would be something I would buy. Charging your phone/iPod etc, while you walk.

    I looked into it a few years back, and it seemed to me that there was enough energy there to do something with.

    1. Re:Why not a charger by TeXMaster · · Score: 1

      My thoughts as well: it shouldn't be too difficult since it has already been done; however, they might not be able to patent it, because of prior art ... (OTOH, in these days of sitting at my workstation a lot means I can only run for half an hour at most, so even the crappies rechargable battery is good enough for me)

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
  57. Apple+Censorship=b1ff by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is probably obvious to anyone here, but you can bypass these things by using 1337-5p34k.

    It's embarassing, though. There is that.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:Apple+Censorship=b1ff by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      but you can bypass these things by using 1337-5p34k

      ah yes so: $\/\/347$|-|0P or maybe (|-|1LD-L4B0R?

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  58. Wireless data by blamanj · · Score: 1

    While I find this particular application to be uninteresting,I do think that it's opening an interesting door for the iPod as a wireless data collection device.

    Will Apple sell iPods to meter readers for gathering gas and water use info?

    What other opportunites exist for mobile data collection?

  59. So this isn't control by feet... by DCstewieG · · Score: 1

    I saw the headline and pictured something like hopping on one foot would skip a song. You're jogging along, bad song comes on, you skip on your right foot once and boom, next song. Jump with both feet and it stops/starts. If it got popular, you'd see joggers doing some weird stuff...especially if they have a lot of crap on their iPod!

    After seeing it's just a pedometer, hmmm [runs to the patent office]

  60. Why not Adidas? by reldruH · · Score: 1

    I've been running for about five years now (competitively and otherwise) and almost every pair of shoes I've owned, whether they were for training or competition have come from Adidas. Same thing with a lot of the people I run with. Adidas just makes good shoes without lots of flash and hype. If Apple had partnered with Adidas I'd at least be considering getting this, it sounds interesting. Of course, one of the reasons Apple chose Nike for this was because of all the hype and flash and recognition they bring. I think that will alienate a lot of more serious runners. Of course, maybe that's not the target audience for this.

    --
    I've always pictured the color of OS zealotry as a sort of bright flamingo pinkish hue
    1. Re:Why not Adidas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple = American owned

      Nike = American owned

      domestic companies should always support eachother

      Plus Nike Patented it first.

  61. iPod on your feet by musselm · · Score: 1


    I shall call it 'iPed'.

  62. but when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when will thy team with a pharmaceutical company to produce an iPod suppository?

  63. Re:Please remove your shoes... but on planes..... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    these days you're likely to get your ass tackled if you're seen fooling with your shoes and plugging stuff into them.

    I thought they were proactive these days, so they just flip a coin to decide whether you're the next one to make their day.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  64. Re:Price too low, where is the catch? by jollespm · · Score: 1

    If you are doing serious running, you should be replacing your shoes every 300-400 miles. I would wager the included battery would easily last that long. Heart rate monitor chest straps do essentially the same thing as these shoes, except they count heartbeats instead of paces. Every HRM battery has lasted at least a year, some more than 2, so I don't anticipate it being a real concern for most customers.

  65. Headset by dmt99 · · Score: 1

    If they put this ipod on the 'sneakers with wheels', does the person need to use a headset?

  66. Patents? by madnuke · · Score: 1

    Think Creative will have a go at Nike now?

  67. Shoes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate shoes! Why can't they come up with one of these that can be used with bare feet.

  68. Why a pedmoeter in the shoes? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure the pedometer would work just as well if it was mounted on the ipod itself and then they could get rid of that pesky wireless interface which is prone to failure.

    More importantly I think this is the merging of the wrong products. What I really want to see is a pocket size GPS that can play music (non-DRM at that), includes a pedmoeter and can tell you all kinds of interesting stuff like cadence, pace, distance traveled, how the hell to get home from here, etc. That's the product I would buy!

    Wait, should I be patenting this?

    1. Re:Why a pedmoeter in the shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the system is designed to display a lot more data than just the number of paces you've gone. In order to accurately calculate approximate distance and speed, it must use some form of accelerometer which would depend on the sensor's placement within the shoe itself.

  69. Do... by gaveawaymyname · · Score: 0

    orange sunglasses and black turtle-necks go well with gym shoes?

  70. Get Smart by Cybersonic · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that pictured someone listening to their shoe immediately after reading the headline? (ala Get Smart http://www.wouldyoubelieve.com/ )

    --
    Cybie! aka Ralph Bonnell
  71. Re:Nike+Apple=??? (OFFTOPIC) by Sawopox · · Score: 1

    WTF kind of tard-mod made this parent post a troll? It's actually one of the most non-trolling posts I've read on /. in a while. While they may not have all of their information and facts correct, they at least made a coherent argument and didn't use "t3h sux0r" or "wtf" in their post.

    MODERATORS, MOD ME DOWN, BUT MOD THE PARENT UP.

    Apologies to all non-tard-mods.
    Thank you.

    --
    [http://it-tastes-so-good.blogspot.com] Are you hungry?
  72. I'll be happy to schlepp even more gear around by chriss · · Score: 1

    I'm currently running 55km each week. I usually carry:

    • Keys
    • some money (in case I break down and need a cap, happened once)
    • iPod nano (for listening to music and language courses)
    • Garmin Forerunner 301 with GPS and heart rate monitor

    I love the Garmin (worn like a wrist watch, but makes a Casio GShock look tiny), but hate the fact that GPS and large buildings do not really match. Living in Berlin there is no way to avoid them without getting out of town first. I always run the same route and the distance measured by the Garmin varies about 10% each time.

    So I'd actually consider to add the sensor as an addition to what I'm already wearing, just to gain accuracy (yes, running can make you quite obsessive). I'd probably keep the Garmin due to the heart rate monitor and some other nice features. The price of the sensor is neglectable compared to the shoes and cloth I wear out per year, the worst thing would be eventually being forced to switch the shoe brand.

    I am possibly close to the perfect target group: I run a lot, I care a lot about how much I run, I listen to music and more while I run. I would match perfectly if I had not already tried to satisfy my desires with appropriate technology. So the only remaining upsale will be for Nike.

    1. Re:I'll be happy to schlepp even more gear around by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      Your GPS receiver will have very little trouble in 'Urban Canyons' and foliage if the GPS chip is a SiRF chip (The SiRFStar III to be precise). The Forerunner 305 has it.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    2. Re:I'll be happy to schlepp even more gear around by chriss · · Score: 1
      Your GPS receiver will have very little trouble in 'Urban Canyons' and foliage if the GPS chip is a SiRF chip (The SiRFStar III to be precise). The Forerunner 305 has it.

      Damn! More toys to buy.

  73. Serious runners aren't going to change for Nike by AriaStar · · Score: 1

    Having grown up in a family that played and coached tons of sports, I've seen a good deal of Nike shoes wear out very quickly. Reebok and Adidas lasted, Nike is just for the flash and the swoosh. But it seems Apple is going for the recognition of the swoosh more than quality. Sad.

    It's a fad that will come and go quickly as the serious runners stay reluctant to switch shoes for the show. You're not going to burn any more calories by having this product unless you're trying to kick yourself for giving in.

  74. Good grief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An iPod shoe has higher demand than a 2-button input device?? Sometimes I really question my loyalty to Apple.

  75. Another Bad joke. by Sometimes_Rational · · Score: 1

    They've really got the competition running scared now!

    --
    Warning: The intelligence of this post may be larger than it appears.
  76. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the audio coach feature that chimes in after the toilet seat weighs you: "You've just lost 3.72 pounds. Great job!"

  77. Running in groups by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    hopefully it will handle each shoe as a unique id and your ipod will know which shoes are yours, otherwise running in groups could be interesting- or even running past someone else.

    1. Re:Running in groups by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I wonder what they'll do for security. I'd hate to come home from a run and find out my shoes had been rooted.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  78. Sensor Designer? by my_breath_smells · · Score: 1

    I suspect the transponders for the Nike+ shoes and Nano were designed for Nike/Apple by Dynastream.

    They've had a historical relationship with Nike, 2.4GHz PANs and RF protocol as evidenced by the press releases found here.

    Wireless Sports Area Network (SPAN? WSPAN?) anyone? Nike, Suunto and Garmin all appear to have worked with Dynastream, so I wonder about future interoperability. . .

    1. Re:Sensor Designer? by my_breath_smells · · Score: 1

      Actually it looks like the ANT platform would likely be the basis of this implementation.

  79. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

    I wonder how people would feel about being told they're pregnant by their toilet?

    Just imagine the false-positives...

  80. Apple + Nike = New slogan by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just do iT

    --
    I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  81. Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the funny posts to this, why oh why didn't Slashdot use the FOOT icon?

    Bah! Wasted opportunity :-)

  82. Exercise by UnixRawks · · Score: 0

    Will slashdotters actually use these shoes? Aren't they for running & jogging with is foreign to the average slashdotter?

    --
    I
  83. oh, great by dino213b · · Score: 1

    I believe we now have the world's smelliest pedometer.

  84. Got to get in on the scam by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
    It appears that if I put MP3 player hardware in random everyday objects, there are plenty of people who would buy them.

    Shoes, cell phones, PDAs are taken, how about underwear? Lingerie? Things that are commonly inserted into body cavities? Keychains? Sunglasses? Scarves? Things people put in their hair to hold it in place or as decoration? Sweatbands? Bracelets or anklets?

    Hell, put them in fruits and vegetables, bags of junk food, suppositories of various kinds, nicotine patches, beverage containers...

    Still, this insistence on listening to music at evry conceivable spare moment seems goofy and alienating. I hope it's a fad...

    1. Re:Got to get in on the scam by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      MP3 Sunglasses exist. I'm sure I've seen bracelets.

  85. I really like this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would buy this, if it also received and recorded data from a heart rate sensor chest strap, like Nike's other product, the Triax Elite HRM/SDM.
    http://www.nike.com/nikerunning/usa/home.jhtml?ref =global_home#equipment

  86. stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why does this make slashdot? why not have light-up shoes on here too? i don't see anything special about shoes that demands computerization. the same could be achieved with a gps device. this seems like a desperate attempt to find some common ground between 2 companies that have nothing in common but style.

  87. The sensor should be hackable. by genegeek · · Score: 1

    Since Nike already makes a sensor that ties to the top of any shoe, I'd bet that their new in-sole sensor will also work by fixing it to some zip ties and putting it on your Adidas. No doubt the sensor is accessible since you'll need to change its batteries. I also doubt that the position in the sole is important, though certainly it will have to be placed on the shoe.

    1. Re:The sensor should be hackable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the cost of the product, I seriously doubt that it's either compatible with any of the triax footpods or is nearly as accurate. Also, the 2.4GHz wireless is probably proprietary, and I very much doubt anybody is going to put in the effort to reverse engineer it...

  88. Not true by geekoid · · Score: 1

    the added weight will mean you burn more claries. Q.E.D.

    It would be nice if the out a device that generate elctricity to help maintain you iPods charge longer.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  89. A new workforce surveillance device? by brachiator · · Score: 1

    I guess "Thinking Different" means using child- and forced-labor sweatshops to produce hot gear? Excellent! I can't wait to rush out and buy several pairs, so eager to line Phil Knight's pockets! Better still, Nike can soon use the Nike+ wireless transmitters to monitor the motion of the 5-year-olds manufacturing the shoes, and get the bosses over to the slackers for a flogging that much faster. This will mean increased productivity -- no price drop, but Nike's profits will increase! Yay!

  90. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by Petronius · · Score: 1

    remember this? didn't quite have the sophistication of your invention though...

    --
    there's no place like ~
  91. New name by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    USA: Iped?
    France: Ipied
    Italia: Ipiede

    I should be in marketing.

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  92. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Yet, I'd still have to wipe my own ass ?
    Some things never change.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  93. Maybe an incentive to exercise... by TheWart · · Score: 1

    It would be cool if Apple/Nike would team up and offer something like 1 free song for every 4 miles ran, etc.

    Might get people to start exercising. *Note* I am saying this as an American...and yes, we do have a major obesity problem.

    1. Re:Maybe an incentive to exercise... by Khashishi · · Score: 1
      It would be cool if Apple/Nike would team up and offer something like 1 free song for every 4 miles ran, etc.

      and lazy hackers will start showing up for free songs--
      1337 miles ran, that's 334 songs..

  94. High end version by grappler · · Score: 1

    I realize this is targeted at a wide consumer audience, but it would be really cool to see some high-end versions of this for more serious athletes. I would love to see this merged with the kinds of functions the really good fitness computers have.

    Here's a sampling of such products:

    Nike's Triax Elite running watch is one of the items on this page
    http://www.nike.com/nikerunning/usa/home.jhtml?ref =global_home#equipment

    Polar's S625X Running watch with S1 foot pod
    http://www.polarusa.com/consumer/runtri/model/S625 x.asp

    and perhaps coolest of all, Suunto's T6
    http://www.suunto.com/dyn/t6

    Nike has the right idea with the foot sensor. All the devices listed above use a similar sort of accelerometer to measure a runner's speed and distance. This Nike+ thing is way cheaper though, which makes me think they're cutting corners. Or they're pricing it extra low to move a lot of them. Hopefully it's the latter.

    What Nike+ is missing, that those other products have, is a heart rate monitor. It's a no-brainer. All they'd need to add is the capability to receive data from the heart rate straps Nike already makes. While speed and distance give you performance, heart rate gives you a great indicator of effort. Once you have both performance and effort, you can divide the one by the other and get your fitness level. Then each time you sync your ipod, you get your new songs, update your podcasts, and see an updated graph of your fitness level rising over the last few weeks.

    On top of that, the ipod nano could easily record every single heartbeat, which is the sort of thing only the extra-high-end monitors (the S625X and T6) can do. With detailed timing information like that, they've been able to do some other nifty things. Suunto computes an estimate for "EPOC" (Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption). Using this, their software can offer advice on how hard your workout should be, and prevent you from overtraining.

    Imagine a consumer product that puts this kind of advanced information in the hands of the casual athlete and makes it simple to use. With this equipment, you're already packing enough computing power to record and store the information. Why not use it?

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  95. Who'd a thunk? iShoes! by cthellis · · Score: 1

    That is pointless and geeky enough to make me ALMOST regret being so goddam lazy. 8-P

  96. Big Suprise Slashdot by abstractrude · · Score: 1

    I love /. This is the first athletic/fitness/healthy item mentioned on slashdot front page in some time, and the first /.two taggings are lame and stupid. Just because you're a nerd doesnt mean you have to be fat and lazy and never do anything physical. Dont label me flamebit or some nerd excuse, this is true although I dont want to generalize. When i saw this i was like cool, for 30 bucks I can compare my workouts to see how im doing and with a device I already carry while working out. Thats it, Its a little device that can help you work out. Not a Beowolf cluster or a new 16 core processor, it helps you work out for 30 bucks. Thats it. The majority of people in this market already have an ipod and a pair of nikes, why not make them do more for you? just a thought.

  97. This isn't new by MojoStan · · Score: 1
    This must be part of the wireless patents Apple filed for a while back... The ipod could become much more than an mp3 player, and could help collect data (pedometer, etc) and stream music to different sources automatically.

    This seems like exactly the thing Jobs and Apple would pursue, a seamless system of wireless integration would perfectly embody their philosophies of style, power, simplicity, and having things 'just work'. It may be just a new shoe accessory right now, but I for one could see this type of technology evolving into new areas

    Although this looks like a very nice product, I don't think this is new technology and I don't think Apple is an innovator here.

    Nike and Philips released the MP3Run player/pedometer in July 2004. A Bluetooth module clipped onto your shoelaces and the player kept track of your time, distance, speed, and pace. In addition to the screen showing your running information, a voice announced your progress either on demand or at preset intervals. The player kept your running history by date, which could be downloaded to your PC and uploaded to the nikerunning.com training log. Does all this sound familiar?

    That said, the Nike/Philips MP3Run was a typically unrefined version 1.0 product. It had a great FM tuner (strong signals, 10 presets), but it didn't work if you were using the pedometer (WTF?). The sound quality was subpar, but perhaps good enough if you only used it when exercising. The capacity (initially) was only 256MB and didn't work with DRM protected WMA or AAC. Some good points: the player was weatherproof/sweatproof and had a built-in strobe light for night running.

    The Nike/Apple product looks like a much better and more refined product with updated technology (and a convenient Nike shoe lock-in), but it's not new. Also, wireless Bluetooth accessories for the iPod are already in existence for your car and home stereo. I'm sure the Apple-branded accessories, if Apple makes them, will be better and more integrated, but I don't think Apple patents or innovations apply here.

    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  98. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by gameforge · · Score: 1

    "Yet, I'd still have to wipe my own ass ?"

    You may be the first person to suggest the iBidet.

  99. Sweatshops are good. Really. by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

    "If these companies paid a fair wage and provided good working conditions, you would see very few people complaining."

    Of course, you never see any of the workers or potential workers in those countries complaining, and there's a reason for that: Nike and other "sweatshop" owners provided far better jobs than were normally available to people in those countries. People FOUGHT to get a spot in one of those factories.

    Privileged, overfed and sheltered children of developed nations may forget this, but at one time in their not-to-distant past, their nation used to be filled with jobs just like the ones in the sweatshop. And eventually, wealth grew and working conditions got better. God forbid you should ASK the sweatshop workers whether or not they want the sweatshops there or not. Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn of the New York Times went to Asia to do just that. Not only do the people overwhelmingly approve of the sweatshops, but in a longer timeframe, the sweatshops contribute to a general increase in the living standards in the areas they are placed. Which is more than anybody can say for those stupid anti-globalization protests or Bono concerts.

    There is no easy shortcut between being a developing nation with a subsistence agricultural economy and an information age economy. If the rise of the Asian economies in the 1980s-1990s proved one thing, it's that each and every one has to go through the same growing pains that the United States and Europe once went through. And sweatshops are a step along the way.

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  100. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, while tempting, I don't think having water sprayed on my ass while I'm sitting on an electric appliance is such a good idea.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  101. Now all they need is a Shark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Apple and Nike are getting together so that they can setup this awesome stunt where a Kewl Dood gets onto a surf board and heads out onto the water, slicks back his shiny black hair and JUMPS A SHARK.

  102. WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the Apple Store article?

    Seriously, the thing has just farking disappeared.

  103. Re:I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interfac by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    He doesn't know how to use the three seashells!

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  104. Would you believe two? (nt) by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  105. Do serious runners actually wear Nikes? by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    No snark, I'm honestly curious. I am a semi-amusing runner (you'd know what I meant if you saw me jogging to work) but I would never wear Nikes. Then again, the reason for that is the fact that I have feet of a rather unusual size, and thus I need New Balance if I want shoes that actually fit.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    1. Re:Do serious runners actually wear Nikes? by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Yes,
      Paula Radcliffe for one. (Yes, I know the big pile of money they pay her has more to do with it).

      The running shop I got fitted at found that only a few shoes were compatible with my running style and after trying them all only two were acceptable. These were Nike and Asics and as there was very little difference between them I chose Nike based purely on the look (and I am glad I did, as I have not damaged my knees since, despite training and running in a half-marathon). Nike might be about the fashion and brand name but they do make good performance gear as well.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    2. Re:Do serious runners actually wear Nikes? by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      I'm a member of a local running group so I know dozens of runners and people who work at running/multisport stores. We talk shoes all the time. Part of the reason for GOING to the group is so you can talk shoes without boring the tits off of people. Anyway, not a single one wears Nikes, and not a single one has ever said anything positive about Nikes. A lot of people wear the Nike Dri-Fit clothes which are actually quite good.

      The shoes have a reputation for being cheaply made gimmicky crap (Air Shox, etc.) Whether that reputation is deserved or not, I don't know. New Balance, Asics, Mizuno, and Brooks seem to be the most popular brands. If you want shoes made in the USA by non-sweatshop workers, New Balance is pretty much your only choice.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    3. Re:Do serious runners actually wear Nikes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding. You do know that Nike has the most advanced performance footwear research laboratory in the world don't you? Since the days Nike's co founder Bill Bowerman (who you will obviously know if you are a serious runner) first created a pair of running shoes with a waffle outsole pattern, Nike has been constantly striving to make the best footwear for the best athletes. The fact that Nike's are seen as a fashion accessory has only recently been seen as an okay thing within Nike.

  106. Needs a heart-rate monitor by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    I'd buy these in an instant if they included a heart-rate monitor. (Yes, there'd need to be a chest-band. So?) Jogging with just my iPod, no watch (for the HRM) and no anklet (for the pedometer), would be lovely.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  107. haha, april firsss... wait by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    never mind

  108. Re:Sweatshops are good. Really. by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Privileged, overfed and sheltered children of developed nations may forget this, but at one time in their not-to-distant past, their nation used to be filled with jobs just like the ones in the sweatshop. And eventually, wealth grew and working conditions got better.

    Because workers unionized and forced employeers to offer better wages and working conditions. Kinda contradicts your whole "sweatshops are good" shtick.

  109. Nike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do it...

    Please, don't buy Nike. Nike exploits people in countries where corrupt governments allow their people few rights. Exploitation which includes children. If you are a good honest person and love your freedom and the democracy which helps you keep it, then please don't reward the corporations and foreign governments which don't care at all about human rights. If you keep rewarding their actions with money, they will keep exploiting innocent people. You allow that exploitation to happen if you encourage the morally corrupt with your money.

    You can take the power away from these corrupt corporations. They are NOTHING without you and your money.

    Nike. Just say no.

  110. Re:Sweatshops are good. Really. by famebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, you never see any of the workers or potential workers in those countries complaining, and there's a reason for that: Nike and other "sweatshop" owners provided far better jobs than were normally available to people in those countries. People FOUGHT to get a spot in one of those factories.

    Aren't you skipping the part about if you complain, you're out, and if you try to organize complaints, you're possibly even dead.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  111. Who cares about counting.. by famebait · · Score: 1

    I'd be more interested if I could use shoes to charge the iPod.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  112. What about the heart rate? by liranz · · Score: 1

    Knowing your distance (or speed/time) is one thing, but in order to have a complete outlook of the exercise, you also have to have the heartbeat.
    If you're in shape, you'd be able to run further and faster, but with less effort than a mare amateur. Measuring your effort (directly derived from heartrate) is very important in order to achieve results.

    Nevertheless, it does seam like a good product to me. I may even buy it :)

  113. There are lots of places that are bad to work. by onevulcanme · · Score: 1

    I feel bad for anyone working in a sweatshop, but unless they were forced to work there against their will then I cannot say a company is evil for contracting a company that uses sweatshops. Of course I would love it if every company paid their employees well, took proper care of them, provided good healthcare, and so fourth. But there are many companies all around the world that mistreat their employees and it is not limited to sweatshops in asia, china, or elsewhere. If I see a good produce for sale and I have the money I am going to purchase it. Because if you buy almost any product obviously someone that worked for that company at some point has been mistreated. I can't say I have ever worked in a sweatshop, but even I have been mistreated. I can't say anything horrible has ever happened to me, but there have been things that were very unfair. Yet I will still buy goods from those places, because I realize when you get down to it there are many other places that have done the same.

  114. Nike + Timex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next is a shoe with a built-in stopwatch. They will be the soles that time men's tries.

  115. Who needs this? by jthayden · · Score: 1

    Give me a break, we all already know how many steps it is from the couch to the fridge and back.

  116. Press Release: www.sirbillkay.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Press Release: The Kennedy Meriwether Collective's label, Sir Billkay Music, announces the launch of their online music store. Having many songs to listen to, this download music site proves to be worth bookmarking at: www.sirbillkay.com

  117. Why do they have nothing? by Potor · · Score: 1
    Don't you think it is a little bit terrible that here you are, singing muted praises for such a lecherous, band-aid solution that aids only very few?

    You've got to ask yourself: why do they have nothing? That's more important than acknowledging what little they receive from Nike etc.

    You are doing missionary work. That's laudable. I've lived in SE Asia, so I know the score a bit too. And I don't see anything else in Nike's actions than their taking advantage of a horrible situation, and saying, in effect, well, we're less horrible. We do less evil.

    And what a recruitment drive that is: work for us, or sell your daughter into prostitution. Any company dependent on the manual labour of such a labour pool is lucky indeed. It's almost like someone has created the perfect army of workers ...

    1. Re:Why do they have nothing? by Orangejesus · · Score: 1

      So you are saying you'd rather them do nothing? look, in fairytale dreamland where everyone is moral and gives things away for free you might be right, but in the real world, where I live, Where I have to spend half my year traveling around BEGGING for funds to help these people buy even basic things like asprin, I will take any help I can get. And if that help comes from some large faceless company that only wants to make a quick buck then I'll take that too. Because practically speaking it's more than what the rest of you are doing. The factories coming in improve the quality of life for these people and thats a fact. Yes they work long hours but almost all of them want to work those hours, they want to work as much as you'll let them. It's ridiculous what their work ethic is. You can sit on your white throne thumping your moral superiority bandwagon all you want but all you are really doing is hurting the people you are trying to help. If you want to protest something protest their polution controls, because if anything is harmful it's that.

    2. Re:Why do they have nothing? by Potor · · Score: 1
      hey, dude, you have no idea what i am doing, or what i have done.

      but it does seem that you wish to canonise the system that brings them down. i predict with that attitude, you'll be begging for a long time.

  118. Oh, its fron Apple?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I'm sure all the fatass Mac fa(n/g)boys will go out and buy one - even if it is useless.

  119. What would be really cool by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    It would be really cool, if the iPod could choose songs based on your speed so actual bpm match your foot steps. That way, it will be adapting to your speed, contrary to what happens always. You adjust your speed to match the bpm of the song you are listening.

    And the pro version would have a sort of DJ, mixing tracks as you gear up or down.

    Loved the "Nitro" song for the extra boost.

  120. I can see the name now... by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

    the iSteppedinDogPoop

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
  121. Re:Sweatshops are good. Really. by Rude-Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously you can't read, so I'll just say this again:

    Just because these jobs might be better then the alternatives doesn't absolve the company of the moral responsiblity not to work these people like slaves just because it's "better then what they had before".

    Read it slowly if you are having trouble understanding.

    "There is no easy shortcut between being a developing nation with a subsistence agricultural economy and an information age economy. If the rise of the Asian economies in the 1980s-1990s proved one thing, it's that each and every one has to go through the same growing pains that the United States and Europe once went through. And sweatshops are a step along the way."

    The first part may be true, but the poor working conditions these people are forced to endure is not neccessary step. I'm not against companies placing factories in developing nations and I do recognise the good they do for the economy. But just because people in the US and Europe went through a working in similar conditions doesn't mean we can't enforce something better now. If $2 a day is a good local wage, that's fine by me. 16 hour days, 6-7 days a week and unsafe working conditions? NOT ACCEPTABLE.

  122. Business Week says battery lasts 1000 hours by kara70 · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may 2006/tc20060523_569911.htm?site=cbs&campaign_id=cb s/ >

    I'm not a runner, so I really don't know. One hour a day, let's say several times a week, that'd be several years.

    Of course, your mileage may vary! Thank you! Tip your waitstaff and try the veal!

  123. Nike/Apple swings and misses - garmin still rules by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    I think most of the people that want to track their speed and distance already have a GPS. This doesn't look like it's gonna get them to switch.

    Did you notice in TFA that the gal is running around with the iPod strapped to her upper arm, as is typical. In this position the iPod display is not visible, so you would only get the voice feedback. TFA has no detail about what cues are delivered to the ear buds or what control you have over them (I want to be notified when my pace drops below 8 min or above 8.25). I'm pretty happy with the visual display that I get from the Garmin foretrex/forerunner which is straped to my wrist and easily visible.

    It would be cool if you could configure your playlist to be controled by milestones. Of course, if you were that interested in doing that you have probably already just trimmed the songs to fit or adjusted the milestones to fit the playlist, e.g. I know that I should be at the Arapaho stop light by the time "Making Thunderbirds" finishes to be on pace.

    Using a pedometer in the shoe is limiting, it only collects data about traveling by foot, nothing for the bike and swim legs. The garmin on my wrist works better than most bike computers and there are no flimsy wires to break - it was priced about the same as a lot of wireless bike odometers too (but it lacks cadence monitoring). It's true I do miss signals while swimming, but I only notice this when I upload the bread crumbs to the PC and examine them closely as the foretrex extrapolates the distance between the points that it does get signals for. I don't look at it as often while I'm swimming as I do on foot or bike anyway, so the missing points don't worry me much.

    Uploading data from my GPS to my PC is somewhat of a hassle, but I didn't buy the manufacter's software either, so the kludged together process I go through is partly my own fault. The syncing of the iPod is pretty cool, way better than the syncing of my GPS. I usually just type it in. But on the rare occasions where I go to the trouble to superimpose the breadcrumbs on top of a map I like to be able to do this, and there isn't a chance with a pedometer.

    There are other things that I would rather see integrated with my iPod than my shoes, but you gotta develop what the crap weasles pay ya to as open source hardware is well, not ready for prime time. Maybe this inteface will generate heaps of cash for Apple and they will expand the interface to things like a heads up display on my sunglasses or stuff that would be really cool.

  124. workout tempo by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    What would be really cool is if it could find a song at the same tempo as you are running, and keep the song in beat with your footsteps. Or you could have it programmed to help you step up the pace by subtly increasing the tempo as you get going. You might not even notice that you were going faster. Using music as a speed training tool, now there's one for the patent office!

  125. Re:Nike+Apple=??? (quick email=plagarism/research) by Infoport · · Score: 1

    Rather, you are ahead if you know where to get the text of an inappropriate Nike SHOE order from 5 1/2 years ago.
    This is actually a re-write of an old email regarding just Nike shoes.
    The author of the re-write does link to the original, but you have to click links or you may not realize it.
    See my other reply: http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=186474&c id=15395619 (slashdot.org)

    ----
    "Plagarize...let no one's work evade you eyes. Remember why the good Lord made your eyes, so plagarize plagarize plagar..but be sure to always call it 'Research'" - Tom Lehrer "Lobachevsky"

  126. The inevitable Dvorak troll on this... by Orthodork · · Score: 1

    ...can be read here

  127. Wow... thanks for the ad by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    So it's an open question: does an 'advanced performance footwear research laboratory' outweigh lousy materials and sweatshop labor? It's a good question.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  128. But does it run on Linux? by pdxChris · · Score: 1

    just asking...