Slashdot Mirror


PS3 Downtime To Fight Disease

Aerenel writes, "CNN reports that Sony has teamed up with Folding@home to use the PS3 to study how proteins are formed in the human body and how they sometimes form incorrectly. From the article: 'Donating [a gamer's] PS3's down time to researchers could help cure Alzheimer's, Parkinson's or mad cow disease.' PS3 users will be able to download a software package that tracks when the PS3 is not being used. While gamers are in school, at work, or asleep, their system's Cell processor can be used to perform simulations for research organizations. The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

289 comments

  1. HAHA by Broken+scope · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yes, like sony is going to get me to do this on there machine when i can do it on my PC.

    --
    You mad
    1. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here, aren't you?

    2. Re:HAHA by eventhorizon82G · · Score: 1

      Is it not better to have it running on both? I don't understand how the two are mutually exclusive. Some use of folding@home is good. More is better.

    3. Re:HAHA by Mike+Zilva · · Score: 0

      You are forgeting that probably a single PS3 can run this as fast as 10 computers..
      That'll reverse your opinion:
      why should you use your computer for 240hours if you could do the same on your PS3 in 24hours?...

    4. Re:HAHA by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry but my $600 would be better spent if i gave it directly as cash to cancer research groups. I'm not going to buy a PS3 now just because it now runs folding at home when im not using it. This is old news anyways that was discussed on here several weeks back. That didn't reverse my opinion, I've got 2 IBM systems journals sitting in my dorm that tell me what a cell can do and what its limits are. I don't need a smart ass like you to tell me anyting.

      --
      You mad
    5. Re:HAHA by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but my $600 would be better spent if i gave it directly as cash to cancer research groups

      Not necessarily. Aside from the processor time, you are also donating maintenance, networking, power and cooling.

      No computational research group can get much with $600. Even the overhead involved with asking, storing, and deciding how to spend $600 would shrink the research value to much less than that.

    6. Re:HAHA by knuxed · · Score: 1

      Also how sure ur $600 is going to go to the right person?

    7. Re:HAHA by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      Actually you would be giving more than 600, you also be giving them the money that it would take to run that PS3, you also be giving the money. Also that why you don't give money to any charity, you pick a reputable one.

      --
      You mad
  2. asfaasf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

    I'm going to pay $600 so I can run a second copy of something that's already spinning away on my PC right now?

    I don't think so.
    1. Re:asfaasf by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I'm going to pay $600 so I can run a second copy of something that's already spinning away on my PC right now?


      No, you are going to pay $600 to play games and run Linux on a Cell processor. The F@H thing is just a perk that you can either use to double (or quadruple) what you are doing on your PC right now or not. If you pay $600 for a PS3 just to do F@H, you are an idiot.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:asfaasf by Gnascher · · Score: 1

      Why would running FaH on your PC preclude you from running in on your PS3?

      More machines = more work units. If you're already running it on one machine ... what's wrong with running it on two?

      But no, you wouldn't buy it just because it runs FaH ... you buy it for its other functionality, and let it fold protiens when you're done playing.

      --
      It's not my fault! It was this way when I got here.
    3. Re:asfaasf by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Why do Communist protest in the US? With Cuba so close, it's like going to Wendy's and demanding a bucket of chicken!
      Your analogy only holds if:
      1) Wendy's were founded on the principle of being able to demand what you want.
      2) Wendy's made sure to burn down any place that sold buckets of chicken, and flings shit on the nearby KFC.
      3) Wendy's didn't already sell chicken as well.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:asfaasf by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Stop trolling... this may come as a shock but the PS3 is actually going to do more then run folding at home. This argument is as useless as saying why would I buy a PS2 or XBox since I already own a DVD Player.

    5. Re:asfaasf by ArcherB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your analogy only holds if:
      1) Wendy's were founded on the principle of being able to demand what you want.

      OK, lets say it was and the vast majority of customers wanted burgers and deplored chicken.

      2) Wendy's made sure to burn down any place that sold buckets of chicken, and flings shit on the nearby KFC.
      The only communist countries the US has gone to war with was N. Korea and N. Vietnam. How are the people of those two countries doing anyway? Also, from what I've heard from my DDR (E. German) and Cuban friends, flung shit would be an upgrade when compared to what they had flung at them on a daily basis.

      3) Wendy's didn't already sell chicken as well.
      but not in a bucket

      You do have a valid point. KFC does not make it its mission to make every fast food joint sell buckets of chicken. Only Chick Filet tries to liberate cattle.

      That said, the analogy still holds. If you want communism, you have other options. Go to Cuba, N. Korea, Venesuela or China. Unlike those countries, no one is forcing you to stay here. If you think you'll be happier in a communist country, I wish you the best of luck and please write to let me know how things are going for you. Go there are leave the US the way 99.999% of Americans like it. That way, everyone is happy. I just want what is best for everyone.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    6. Re:asfaasf by beckerist · · Score: 1

      Though, why not? I'm not saying to purchase the system exclusively for this functionality, that would be a waste of money, though I must say that this feature is the first for the system that is pushing me towards wanting one. I try to run @home utils on my PC any time I can. Unfortunately, with the world today you can no longer run them at work. Note: I'm aware SETI@home is different than FAH, but the concept that was scrutinized is identical. This leaves home computers to run the programs. My poor 1.7gHz computer can barely push out a unit a week, and though I'm sure every little bit helps, I'm excited that the PS3 kiddies will be contributing to a constructive cause whether they want to or not.

    7. Re:asfaasf by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      Wow, I was going to say that there's gain in buying a game system that runs F@H if weren't already going to get it. I've already got a computer to fill that role.

      I mean F@H adds no extra value to the system, since you could just buy a PC and run F@H on it 24-7 for less than a PS3. In fact, you could probably get Wii with that too, and still pay less.

      But with all the hate-replies you got, I'm glad I read your post before writing mine. Thanks!

    8. Re:asfaasf by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      I'm going to get offtopic but have you ever thought about this at all? Or, conversely have you ever been to any of the countries you rattle off about. In history there have never actually been any communist countries. The countries you list are state-capitalist, totalitarian, autocratic, etc. Seriously I hope you are not really a scientist because you are giving the rest of us who are a bad name. Read Das Kapital find out what communism is. It won't hurt you its just a book. Reading contradictory, to our own views, books is important if you are really a scientist. Presently you are saying a cow and a fish are the same. This shows that you know very little of what the world is really about. Learn then speak.

    9. Re:asfaasf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The F@H thing is just a perk[...]
      Hey now, watch your language, Q-Bert, there are children reading this site.
    10. Re:asfaasf by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      To keep away from the topic.... (or at least make it our own)

      My sig was in response to Cindy Shehan and the current leader of code pink (forgot her name) that went to Venesuela and Cuba and called them paradise... and then came back here! If I found paradise and was welcome to live there, I would have stayed. I certainly would not have come back to a place that had neither the government, healthcare system nor economy that I wanted. I would have stayed in Cuba, worked the job I was given and spent the rest of my time on the beach! Since I am a capitalist, I stay in the US. If I lived in Venesuela as a capitalist, I would move here rather than try to change the political system to something other than that of what the Venesuelan people have chosen. Why go to KFC when you want a burger? Why live in the largest capitalist economy in the world when you want communism? I'm not saying love it or leave it, but why stay and try to change it to something that so many of us don't want when you have other options?

      You are correct on my knowledge of the world. It is limited to what I see and read and the people I talk to. Granted, the people I meet from the former DDR didn't like it much or they would have stayed. I have not traveled there to talk with those that enjoyed living behind the iron curtain.

      Thanx for the tip. Maybe I will read that book.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    11. Re:asfaasf by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing, without major reengineering to the human genome, the ideas outlined in Das Kapital will NEVER work.

    12. Re:asfaasf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the Wendy's board make it illegal for any of their customers to enter KFC? Did Wendy's bomb, napalm and invade KFC back in 1961, killing 2000 KFC employees and then spend the last 45 years trying every diplomatic power in their disposal to make sure everyone associated with KFC starves to death? Does Wendy's use loudspeakers to yell recruitment offers into KFC, promising lush salaries and great working conditions but turn away potential applicants before they even set foot in the store? Has it been Wendy's official policy to buy out KFC in a hostile takeover since 1820? Does Wendy's force KFC to lease them a store for a trivial fee and use it as a home for their most blatent offenses to human rights? Are all of Wendy's objections to KFCs working conditions really because in 1959 KFCs board didn't recognise the shares created by a corrupt KFC chairman which were sold Wendy's wealthiest investors?

      The situations arn't really comparable. Leave Cuba about its buisiness you mean American tyrant.

    13. Re:asfaasf by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      When you find these gene's that prevent kindness and love for everyone be sure to tell people. I didn't think ignorance and indoctrination were genetic.

    14. Re:asfaasf by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      Wow that was the most intelligent thing I've ever seen posted on something a lesser slashdotter would have just modded flamebait and dismissed. The important thing with any system or anything at all is to learn as much as possible and make a intelligent decision. I don't agree with project for a new american century but I will read it to find out why. Good show ArcherB.

  3. Well... by urbanradar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This definitely seems like a good thing. But I wonder, will gamers really let that influence their purchasing decisions? Honestly, I have my doubts.

    1. Re:Well... by Babbster · · Score: 1

      It probably shouldn't influence a gamer's decision to purchase the PS3, but it's a lot more interesting to me than the tilt functionality of the new controller, or Blu-ray for that matter.

      I won't buy a PS3 this year (or next, unless something magical happens with PS3 pricing), but I don't think there's any way to spin this as a negative. Nice job, Sony...for once. :)

    2. Re:Well... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      It may not be a major influence on their purchasing decisions, but it will give bragging rights. Think of something along the lines of "...well the Cell is so powerfull it can be used to find a cure for cancer..." I think this will influence less savvy gamers. The ability to run Folding@Home makes the computer seem more powerfull then the competition.

    3. Re:Well... by adam31 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, it all depends on how it's marketed, it could have a huge snowball effect.


      If you award people 'hero points' and display a leaderboard showing how many lives each gamer has saved... or break it down by institution-- like college or business. Especially if the interface is really cool. Maybe have a hall of fame of cool-looking protein folds you could download.

      It could become quite a competition to not play your PS3, particularly if launch titles turn out to be as good as launch titles typically are.

    4. Re:Well... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Increased strain on the parts, combined with a possibly poor heatsink design (a la the vaio notebook) could cause the constant CPU usage to result in the system dying long before it should, ie "built in obsolecense." Certainly wouldn't be a first for Sony.

      Not saying it's gonna happen, hell it may be built completely flawless for all I know. But, you know, it could be a "conspiracy" ;)

    5. Re:Well... by neoform · · Score: 1

      Dunno if i'd buy a PS3, but that's just because this is probably the only good thing i've read about a PS3..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    6. Re:Well... by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Given the heat-related problems that Apple laptops (and desktops) have been having... and the fact that these same designs are being sold as Dells, HPs etc as well, I'd be tempted to run any new machine such as this at 100% 24 hours a day for at least a month or two after I got it. That way, if it's going to go up in smoke it will still be during the short period during which the store will replace or refund lemon products without a lot of hassle. Why subject yourself to the whims of the manufacturer when you can just take it back to Walmart, Costco, or the like and get a refund, in most cases, no-questions-asked? Unfortunately for Apple users they are probably dealing with an Apple store under orders to discourage returns, but buying from one of the EZ-return retailers you are in pretty good shape.

    7. Re:Well... by honkycat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably not much, but that's not really the point. It's good publicity that can't hurt. People won't go out and think "wow i can help fold proteins," they'll just give a little thought to Sony and the PS3 when they read the articles about it. It's all about marketing, and subliminal marketing is the best kind.

    8. Re:Well... by Babbster · · Score: 1

      I really like that concept! It could not only be a nice feature for PS3 owners to "stress test" their system, but if units were failing fast under these conditions Sony haters could have a reason to buy PS3s, over-stress the system until "death" and exchange; lathering, rinsing and repeating to cost Sony lots of money. ;)

    9. Re:Well... by Jerrry · · Score: 1
      I won't run any background tasks on my machines until CPUs come out that use substantially less power and generate far less heat than current chips. I'm already paying $125 in electricity a month to run my systems and even in the winter the room temperature is consistently over 80 degrees.

      And I'm just a home user. Expand this to large organizations and we're talking about lots of power and cooling. Unused CPU cycles are not free.

    10. Re:Well... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      will gamers really let that influence their purchasing decisions?

      Depends on whether or not they can deduct the purchase of the PS3 now as a charitable contribution to medical research;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    11. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Me thinks a lot of the people in the subset called "gamers" don't really do that much when it comes to taxes, just the 1040ez.


      If they're already itemizing, the price difference isn't goign to be that big a deal in the grand scheme, a night or two out on the town pretty much makes up the difference.

    12. Re:Well... by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1
      I won't run any background tasks on my machines until CPUs come out that use substantially less power and generate far less heat than current chips.

      Get a G3.

      No, seriously.

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    13. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've decided to get a Wii, and an extra controller.

      I can use the $300 I save to build a dedicated Folding at home machine.

      Now I can cure diseases, play games, and tell sony what I think of them
      all at the same time.

      I don't think this is really going to add much to the discussion so I post it at
      0, instead of +2.

    14. Re:Well... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I've run Linux on a PS2 and since getting a second one in 04 that's all this one does, run Linux. 24/7 except for the ocassional temporary shutdown. The only hardware problems I've ever had with a PS2 are DRE's.

    15. Re:Well... by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the ps3 can handle a little folding, games traditionally take up 100% cpu anyways, so I dont see what the difference is.

    16. Re:Well... by urbaer · · Score: 1
      It probably shouldn't influence a gamer's decision to purchase the PS3, but it's a lot more interesting to me than the tilt functionality of the new controller, or Blu-ray for that matter.
      True and true. I suppose it might influence a gamer's decision to pick up a PS3 though, depending on the reason that they were holding off buying it. The only reason I can think of that this would negate is the "Sony are evil" concept that was brought about by rootkit issues. Reasons such as "no good games", "too damn expensive", "it's just prettier graphics", "I don't have HD" and possibly others I can't even think of still apply. There's no reason the 360 or Wii couldn't do this (although I'll readily admit that the Wii probably won't be able to process as much... but still).
      but I don't think there's any way to spin this as a negative

      Sony's delay in PAL regions slows research into the cure for Alzheimer's? Okay... maybe there isn't a way to spin this as a negative....
    17. Re:Well... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you, but I don't play games 24/7.

  4. In other words... by bombshelter13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In other words, your PS3 uses network bandwidth and electricity you paid for with your money to calculate who knows what and send it God knows where when you're not using it and anyone who tries to stop their PS3 from doing this is a horrible person who supports cancer.

    1. Re:In other words... by yincrash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget shortening the useful life of the PS3 itself!

    2. Re:In other words... by urbanradar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      RTFA. It's on a voluntary basis. If you don't like it, don't do it. But it certainly is nice to have the possibility, and, as it seems, officially approved by Sony.

    3. Re:In other words... by timster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, to be fair, the bandwidth is probably minimal and, in cold seasons, the power consumption will just turn into heat and make itself slightly useful.

      From the summary, it sounds like this will be something you can download if you want to, just like it is on the PC. I don't think people who don't run Folding@Home are often attacked for being horrible people who support cancer.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    4. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not quite. But it's a good way for kids to convince their parents to shell out all that cash for a shiney new PS3.

    5. Re:In other words... by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 0

      They are using the electricity you are wasting by leaving a PS2 running while it's not being used.

      As for bandwidth it probably uses in a year what most people use in a hour of playing Halo.

      If you don't like it, turn it off or just don't buy a playstation 2.

    6. Re:In other words... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm going to spend $600 of my money to make sure that a pharmaceutical company somewhere can get rich off finding a cure for mad cow disease.

      Right!

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Contrary to what distributed computing propaganda says, when you have your CPU at 100% utilization, it uses MORE power than when it is idling. So no, these programs do not just use power that would have been wasted otherwise, since they increase power consumption. If the computer is left on to do nothing, there is wasted energy, yes, but the implication that running folding@home or any other distributed computing program is, from an energy usage standpoint, free, is patently false.

      It is also deceitful to try to convince people otherwise.

      And yes, I think even a couple bucks more per month in electricity usage is significant.

    8. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a PS3

    9. Re:In other words... by grommit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Riiiight.. because the heating/cooling cycles of electronic equipment being turned on and off repeatedly is *much* better for it.

      At least try to come up with a valid reason to not use it.

    10. Re:In other words... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      "to calculate who knows what and send it God knows where"

      And that is exactly why I don't run those programs. I am not smart enough to know if they are looking for a cure for cancer, run nuclear bomb simulations, search for ET's, develop biological or chemical warfare agents... etc.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    11. Re:In other words... by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      And yes, I think even a couple bucks more per month in electricity usage is significant.

      Ah yes ... your spending a little electricity to post insight on Slashdot is worthwhile, but someone else who chooses to donate their own money in purchasing electricity to help a medical research project is being wasteful.

    12. Re:In other words... by Aelcyx · · Score: 1

      Bucks?! C'mon, it's more like cents. Someone can do a calculation on how much power is drawn from a CPU at 100% usage running 24-7 for a month multiplied by the average cost of kW-hour in the US and give us a real number.

      Oh, and protein folding is potentially a pathway to assembler-based nanotechnology. Think about it: DNA is like a hard drive, the proteins that read it are like processors, and the amino acids are the output -- it's a programmable machine that makes matter with control at the molecular level. The only problem is, we don't know what configuration the amino acids will fold into, as the article says. Surely looking at it this way will get some /.ers more motivated to try this.

    13. Re:In other words... by DSW-128 · · Score: 1
      Oh boy! Officially approved by Sony. All my dreams are coming true!

      (I agree that it's good that it's voluntary, and keen that it's even an option, but I just had to try poking fun at the approval part of your post.)

      --
      This .sig is printed on 100% recycled electrons, but is best viewed using 100% fresh photons.
    14. Re:In other words... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Not quite...

      I would assume that most people would leave it standby mode like the PS2. This uses very very little power.

      To use this application, you'll have to leave your PS3 on all the time, so it's going to use significantly more electricity than if you put it in standby/turn it off. This probably isn't going to be a big deal - maybe 5-7KWH/month - but shouldn't be ignored either.

    15. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not the half of it!!! Did you know that when you power up your PS3 to play a game, it uses your ELECTRICITY FOR THAT TOO? OMG. What about my net, does it use my network? OMG OMG OMG. Mommie protect me! And your right, other then the fact they say it's going to folding at home to help fight cancer, who knows what that data is!!!! They could be setting up a rootkit RIGHT IN MY INTERWEB!!!111one!

      Whew, it hurt my head to stoop to your level, but I think I managed to survive it.

    16. Re:In other words... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I really want to meet with the guy who modded you Insightful. "God knows where" is Stanford.edu, Sony doesn't force people and I am sure you were never in their potential customer list.

      Go play with some command line and turn off that tungsten bulb you forgot on, it possibly eats more than a PS3 without doing anything.

    17. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      in cold seasons, the power consumption will just turn into heat

      Exactly. I run Folding@homewhenever it's cold enough to need a sweater, as the extra heat just warms my apartment. I haven't turned on my bedroom heater in three years. During the summer months, I deactivate any and all distributed computing apps.

    18. Re:In other words... by Logreybaby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Guessing 60 watts difference between idle and 100%.
      Assuming F@H running for a month.
      Assuming price of electricity is ten cents per kWh.

      60 watts * 720 hours * $0.10 > $4.30

      So yeah bucks.

    19. Re:In other words... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Bucks?! C'mon, it's more like cents.

      Don't be so sure. Let's assume that the PS3 at peak load draws roughly as much power as an Xbox 360 - 160 watts. Assuming that the folding program completely loads the box, and assuming a 24/7 runtime for 30 days, that's about 115 kilowatt hours. According to the Department of Energy, the average retail price of electicity in the US for June of 2006 was 10.84 cents per kilowatt hour. 10.84 cents times 115 kilowatt hours is $12.46 per month, or over $150 a year!

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    20. Re:In other words... by Milican · · Score: 1

      I'll use the 160-watts as a good starting number even though the PS3 is supposed to be more powerful than the XBox360. In Dallas, TX the main energy provider TXU is charging $0.151 / kw-hr. This comes out to $17.40 per 30-day month and $211 per 365-day year. Or basically a Nintendo Wii per year... hehe.

      JOhn

    21. Re:In other words... by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Erm, 5-7kWh/mo is only ~ 7-10W draw. Even the PS2 draws about 30W (~ 21kWh/mo) and the PS3 will likely be closer to the 360 at about 160W (~ 115kWh/mo).

    22. Re:In other words... by Aelcyx · · Score: 1

      Shit...

      I hope I can write it off as a charitable expense come April.

      Thanks for all the crunching, folks.

    23. Re:In other words... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The problem is, being a consumer product, Sony consumer products at that, I don't expect the PS3 to be designed to operate non-stop like that. I would expect that the F@H software probably uses more of the Cell chip at any given instant than a game would.

    24. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cooling fans, hard drives, and other wear parts only last so long before going caput.

      (Too many people on slashdot think like EE's and not enough like ME's)

    25. Re:In other words... by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Riiiight.. because the heating/cooling cycles of electronic equipment being turned on and off repeatedly is *much* better for it.

      Running at 100% CPU usage 24/7 generates more heat, more heat means fans need to spin faster, fans spinning faster means they die faster. Also, fans spinning 24/7 also suck up more dust faster inside the console, making it hotter and requiring the fans to spin yet faster.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    26. Re:In other words... by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      "Contrary to what distributed computing propaganda says"

      Propaganda like this?

    27. Re:In other words... by fuzz6y · · Score: 1
      in cold seasons, the power consumption will just turn into heat and make itself slightly useful
      That will serve to offset the cost a lot, but not completely, because chances are your household heat is provided by either gas (which costs less per joule) or a heat pump (which is over 100% efficient because it can steal heat from outside).
      --
      If you're going to be elitist, it would help to be elite.
    28. Re:In other words... by tapehands · · Score: 1

      In addition to it being voluntary...isn't there a special invention called a -gasp!- power button?

      All smarminess aside, if you don't want it using your electricity, you can do what tons of elderly people do; hook it up to a surge protector. Upon deciding that you need to power down your system, flip the On/Off switch on the surge protector.

      It also appears that the PS3 has a power switch on the back of the unit, much like what the PS2 had. Granted, it isn't as easy to position as a power strip, but it lessens the chance of turning off other devices unintentionally.

    29. Re:In other words... by Dead_Smiley · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I used to run folding@home on 4-5 PC's 24/7. Then I realized that I *might* be able to save some money by not doing that. It turned out to be around $40 a month. In the summer months, you have to get rid of the excess heat produced by all the PC's running in addition to running the PC's. I decided I really shouldn't be doing this as long as I am an underpaid apartment dweller.

      --
      I know what the Internet is, what the hell is this Interweb business?!
    30. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it will use more electricity, and I don't want to pay for it.

      The CPU uses more power the higher the CPU load. That is why it gets hotter. So no, it is not using power that would otherwise be wasted. It is using MORE power than would be used otherwise, and costs more money for me to run.

      I don't know why you distributing computing advocates refuse to acknowledge this. Duh.

    31. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said it was wasteful? I said no such thing. I didn't even imply it. Thanks for setting up that strawman and knocking it down. Someone failed critical thinking class. Or maybe you are just being a deceitful dick.

      I don't care what you spend your money on. But when you *LIE* to people and tell them that it costs nothing or just a few cents to run your stupid program, it gets irritating. You are fucking trying to push and guilt trip your shit on people. That is NOT cool.

      But I do find it hilarious that you people act all "holier-than-thou" about running a computer program. Keep the laughs coming, thanks!

    32. Re:In other words... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      If the PS2 can handle 30 hour compiles (wxPython),. the PS3 will probably do just fine.

    33. Re:In other words... by yincrash · · Score: 1

      You're implying that a computer will last longer when it's always run at 100% capacity? I didn't realize I had to state the obvious.

    34. Re:In other words... by donaldm · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to do run something like Folding@home on your PS3 then don't install it and if you don't want to waste electricity then switch your PS3 off. In fact to really save money don't buy a PS3.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  5. Pity by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I guess when all else fails, they can always go for the pity angle. "Oh!! Please help us ingrain Blu-Ray! We're fighting DISEASE!"

    1. Re:Pity by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

      Have they used "Think of the children!" yet?

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
    2. Re:Pity by Tetrad_of_doom · · Score: 1

      If the PS3 saves lives when you don't play it, aren't you effectively killing people by playing it?

  6. After the Root-Kit... by emil10001 · · Score: 0, Troll

    will anybody trust Sony with usage-reporting software on their PS3?

  7. Sign me up by sexyrexy · · Score: 1

    That definitely changes my mind about paying $600 for a gaming console! Why didn't they do this from the start? The option to run F@H on my PS3 DEFINITELY makes up the 200+ difference between it and my other next-gen options.

    --

    Rex is 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Sign me up by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      Wow, are you being sarcastic? You'd pay $200 just to add a node to a gigantic distributed computer? I think this is a nice feature for those who are already considering to buy it, but I doubt it'll turn haters into lovers like it did for you.

    2. Re:Sign me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might wish to grab a dictionary and look up irony.

  8. Fight my disease by OSS_ilation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do I have Alzheimer's, or did I read about this last month?

    1. Re:Fight my disease by OSS_ilation · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even better, how about a link? PS3 to cure Alzheimer's?

    2. Re:Fight my disease by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      No, that would be Deja Vu.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    3. Re:Fight my disease by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      No, that would be Deja Vu.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
  9. Huh? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

    If I'm already ambivalent about spending that much money on a game system, the question "What will the game system, which I bought to play games, do when I'm not playing games on it?" is not likely to be a significant influence on my decision.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. Most gamers who would care about this are already running F@H on their computers.

      But alas, we are not their target market. This is a ploy aimed squarely at a certain type of parent who wants to feel they are being proactive in finding solutions to the issues that plague all humanity, while also providing their little precious angels with something to do while they are busy watching Tele and/or sending email to the interweb.

      Really, there are people like that.

    2. Re:Huh? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Agreed. All things being equal, it might be a deciding factor but I doubt that. It's not like people buy their PC based off of how well it runs SETI/Folding/etc, it's very doubtful that consoles would be any better off. Based off of how hot my PS2 and XBox become after long period of use, I'm not sure if I would want to leave my shiny new $600 console on 24x7 doing computationally intensive activites.

    3. Re:Huh? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      While folding@home is a (worthy) gimmick I see it more as a demonstration of what a console could do when it's not serving up games. Think of what a PC under your TV could do - video conferencing, home security, reminders, shopping lists, play movies, edit movies, act as a DVR - you name it. Modern consoles are as powerful as low-end PCs like the Mac Mini, so why shouldn't they do more than play games?

      While some of the possibilities are fanciful, I hope that consoles are able to *something* when I'm not playing games on it. Even it just acts as a DVD or music player. After all, I have a finite number of plugs by my TV so why should I have 2 or 3 devices cluttering up the joint and consuming power when a console should be up do the job? Therefore, the PS3 (and to a lesser extent) the XBox 360 are very appealing to me. Not only will they play games, but when they're no doing that they can also play videos, music, photos, offer casual browsing capabilities and so forth. If the Linux in the PS3 is accesible and up to snuff, perhaps it can do other things too. All from a single box, a single PSU, a single TV connection, a single interface.

      I don't think much of the Wii. It doesn't even offer DVD playback though you get (*gasp*) a photo viewer assuming your camera uses SD cards. For $50 more you'd be better off to get the far more powerful XBox 360 core. Especially if you have a hi-def TV but even if you don't.

  10. Not HAHA by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, this article is kind of a dupe but the CNN article has a lot of new information.

    One of tidbits is that the researchers have to dumb down the PC distributed version so that it runs on even the slowest computer. In fact, they have to play to the lowest common denominator. With the PS3, it's standardized so they can inch out every bit of performance from the chipset. On top of that, they know there will only be on GPU so they can write the renderer for that and you'll see the protein folding on your screen. It will look all science-y and you can navigate around it. People might like this as a screen saver or conversation piece. The researchers are also hoping that it attracts people to also install it on their computers to aid in this endeavor.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Not HAHA by ajs · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course, this is Sony, and people are allowing them to run software on their box that "phones out".... Who wants to bet there will be extra data sent out if you've ever played an unlicensed game or media in the console?

    2. Re:Not HAHA by dubiousmike · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Step 1 - Keep using machine when user isn't around
      Step 2 - Running all of the time will ensure a standard MTBF causing users to buy new units
      Step 3 - Profit!

    3. Re:Not HAHA by moro_666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While probably 10% offtopic, i still hope this gets out to all the science app builders :

        Please make your applications scalable in % of cpu power used :)

        I have a laptop here, cute 3200 bogomips under it's belly, but i refuse to burn my system's cpu in favor of curing cancer. I wouldn't mind to give you 10% or 20% of the cpu power, because that wouldn't heat it up, but your applications that burn at 110% of the power available, are just not usable for most partly "idle" machines. Moreover, you'd get a bunch of workforce from fileservers which are idling on the cpu 90% of the time .. but as long as your applications just slay their performance in cold blood and cause them to run at nearly nuclear explosion temperatures (renicing the process will help against the first issue sometimes, but not the latter), you are just losing possible helpers.

        One minimalistic "sleep" or "delay" into your mainloop, and whoop's , you're going to get more work done than you have ever before. Until then, nothing will fold on my machines over here.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    4. Re:Not HAHA by kirun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't Sony make a loss on the hardware? Maybe they're banking on the Blu-Ray components dropping sharply in price by the time PS3s start breaking down, but it looks to me more like an attempt to get one bit of good PR not written by Official Sony Fanboy Magazine. Note that Wii will also be always-on, but Nintendo have taken the opposite approach, aiming for minimal standby power usage, waking only to receive downloads of freshly minted swag for your games. So, if there's some evil MTBF conspiracy, two companies had the same idea at once... Let's not dump on Sony's decision too much, this will give the research a nice boost, but it doesn't scream out "Get a PS3!" to me by any stretch.

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    5. Re:Not HAHA by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would you insist on "scaling" applications when you could just set the priority(win)/nice(*nix) level lower? (i.e., higher nice value in linux, lower priority setting in windows). That way, it will always yield to every other system that needs to use the CPU. (And nevermind the belief that a process can use only 'part' of a single-core CPU)

    6. Re:Not HAHA by cbhacking · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think BOINC allows processor utilization limits (sorry, I haven't set the configuration in months). Generally, you can also intentionally scale down the processor (tying this to a specifc application might be slightly tricky but should be possible).

      Or you could just make sure your laptop has adaquate ventilation and run it like it's supposed to be used.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    7. Re:Not HAHA by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why would you insist on "scaling" applications when you could just set the priority(win)/nice(*nix) level lower? (i.e., higher nice value in linux, lower priority setting in windows). That way, it will always yield to every other system that needs to use the CPU. (And nevermind the belief that a process can use only 'part' of a single-core CPU)


      Because even if my computer isn't running anything important, running it at 100% CPU usage will invoke the full cooling capacity of the system. For a desktop, this means a louder fan noise. For a laptop, however, it may not be well-suited to 24/7 100% CPU utilization. The fans are small and can get _very_ noisy. The bottom of the laptop can get so hot as to be unusable on your lap; quite possibly, you could shorten the lifespan of your components.
      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    8. Re:Not HAHA by MustardMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you even READ the post you replied to? He specifically states why "nice" isn't a solution. Nice doesn't stop a program from using all the CPU, it just stops it from using CPU when another program wants it. His complaint is constantly having a system peaked near 100% CPU usage, which produces shitloads of heat, shortening processor life.

    9. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 5, Informative
      BOINC allows such a setting, but it's buried deep within the settings.

      The United Devices client has it at 50% by default, and is easier to configure.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    10. Re:Not HAHA by Lord+Crc · · Score: 3, Informative

      One minimalistic "sleep" or "delay" into your mainloop, and whoop's , you're going to get more work done than you have ever before. Until then, nothing will fold on my machines over here.

      The problem is that this won't work well for Folding@Home. It doesn't work like distributed.net where one can just assign some part of the keyspace to one client and have it work on that. The work units returned are used to generate new work units. That's why they have such "tight" deadlines. See their FAQ for details.

      So for Folding@Home, you'll most likely end up past the deadline (unless you got a VERY spiffy laptop), and not helping all that much (although your work will be used for double-checking afaik).

      However for other projects, distributed.net style, it would work out nicely, and I belive BOINC already has an option for this (the new F@H client might aswell, I can't remember, all my folding is done on my linux box now, and I haven't touched it in ages).

    11. Re:Not HAHA by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      I'd like it too, for a different reason. I have a Mac Pro, and I wouldn't mind running Folding at the lower SpeedStep on one or two processors. that'll keep it cool and power-efficient. Since I use it for eyeTV anyways, if I could run Folding and eyeTv at the SpeedStep settings, Folding is practically free for me.

    12. Re:Not HAHA by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget the power consumption increase when any computing device is running at 100%. That heat's coming from somewhere.

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    13. Re:Not HAHA by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but as long as your applications just slay their performance in cold blood and cause them to run at nearly nuclear explosion temperatures (renicing the process will help against the first issue sometimes, but not the latter), you are just losing possible helpers.
      Hmmm, nuclear temparatures, eh.

      My home server is on 24/7/365 and runs F@H. Gkrelm reports my temps. at 52.0, 27.0, and 51.5

      It's reniced to 10 so that means it is actually running at a nice value of 19 ....

      25848 smoker 39 19 89192 48m 1152 R 96.4 4.8 79:37.24 FahCore_7a.exe

      And I took that top reading while posting to /. in Firefox 1.5.0.7 and downloading a torrent of *some_linux_iso* via Azureus (java) while logged in on a Gnome 2.10.1 desktop on that machine. I use only this machine for the internet. My XP box never goes near the WWW at all.
      Maybe you are running a Microsoft OS ?

      BTW, I've been running this since Dec. 5 2004 and it has never caused an issue with performance, as far as I'm concerned.
      My stats.
      (the machine concerned is a Sempron 1.5 ghz with 1GB RAM running FC4, 3504.08 bogomips)

      Why anyone would run F@H on a laptop is beyond me anyway, it needs to run constantly to get the best results for the project. As another poster mentioned, there is a time limit for results, so you're wasting your time and energy if you keep interrupting it. Those results that are late will be disregarded.

    14. Re:Not HAHA by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      I run my laptop as a desktop replacement , around 22-24 hours a day (depending on if i take it along to work or not), so there is the answer for the "why".

        Secondly, last time i ran it, my cpu peaked at 80+ degrees in notime and the machine decided quietly just to shut down, which wasn't really what i expected :) I only managed to check the cpu temp and didn't even get to 'killall fah' (checking the temp. was the first reaction to the noise that the fan started to make).

        While i saw this feature on BOINC, i didn't see it on fah. Let's just hope that they can improve that department and maybe reorganize their app a bit so that they could allow slower clients too. Even at 10% only, my machine would still produce 2.2-2.4h of production capability per day, counting in all machines that don't want to burn like candlelights, that would sum up quite a lot. (Why didn't they sub-boinc this thing anyway ?)

        For the boinc people, thumbs up as long as the idea goes (the implementated gui / xml conf is a bit odd, i have to admit, but certainly a step in the right direction).

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    15. Re:Not HAHA by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One of tidbits is that the researchers have to dumb down the PC distributed version so that it runs on even the slowest computer.

      That's not true, and I wish people would refuse to assume that it is.

      Researchers may have chosen to dumb down the PC version, but it is a triviality to load a different DLL or call different code based on architecture or, hopefully, actually based on capabilities.

      There is no reason whatsoever that the PC version can't make the best out of everything from a 386 up to a Core 2 Duo. If my MPEG encoder can do it, then so could F@H. Granted, there's a certain amount of work involved, but it's no more (and probably less) than developing wholly separate versions, especially for other platforms.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loading the DLL is trivial. Formally verifying a complicated i387 code path is not trivial. Formally verifying an optimized code path for every possible permutation of SSE, SSE2, SSE3, MMX, MMX Extended, 3DNOW, Expanded 3DNOW, et cetera, ad nauseum is most decidedly not anywhere near trivial.

    17. Re:Not HAHA by drinkypoo · · Score: 0
      Loading the DLL is trivial. Formally verifying a complicated i387 code path is not trivial. Formally verifying an optimized code path for every possible permutation of SSE, SSE2, SSE3, MMX, MMX Extended, 3DNOW, Expanded 3DNOW, et cetera, ad nauseum is most decidedly not anywhere near trivial.

      Based on the number of people actually willing to download the F@H client and run it on the PS3, which will probably be pretty small, don't you think that barring the publicity stunt of Sony donating time on a crapload of PS3s to advance the F@H project, the effort would have been better spent supporting one of those architectures than doing a complete port to another system? (although AFAIK the box is running Linux anyway.)

      I'm not saying the whole thing is easy; I'm saying that making the framework support all that is trivial. Implementing the actual implementations is another story, yes. Regardless, there is no reason why the PC version has to target only i386; I think we can all agree on that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wouldn't mind to give you 10% or 20% of the cpu power"

      You can set the percent of the CPU you want it to use in both the graphical and console-based versions. Have you even tried it? The setting is quite obvious.

    19. Re:Not HAHA by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

      I doubt sony will bring out a laptop gaming system.

    20. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Folding@Home, the console version anyway (I don't use the gimmicky GUI version), allows you to set the percent of CPU usage requested, exactly as you asked for.

      Since the current version doesn't use more than one processor, a single instance of the console version would use the specified % of a single CPU, not of each CPU. If you wanted to use each CPU that much, you could set up multiple instances of the console version, at a cost of some memory.

              -ShadowRanger

    21. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Work units without deadlines won't have that problem.

      In addition, they give you something like one and a half times the time required for a pathetically slow computer (somewhere around 200 MHz) to finish the unit. I'm operating from memory of an old FAQ on their site that I can't find anymore, but it is in that neighborhood. Even at only 10-20% of the CPU, a modern CPU running 24/7 will usually make the deadline, if you absolutely insist on work units with deadlines.

              -ShadowRanger

    22. Re:Not HAHA by dknj · · Score: 1

      Did you even do a FUCKING SEARCH on google? Threadmaster can throttle your cpu usage. Linux equivalant. Solaris can throttle cpu usage in zones. His complaint could be answered by a simple google search. He is just finding excuses...

    23. Re:Not HAHA by Petersson · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the power consumption increase when any computing device is running at 100%. That heat's coming from somewhere.

      Unless you run windows 95/98 (not sure about Me) which by nature doesn't do 'HLT' instruction when idle. By not implementing this little thing, which can be done by tiny utilities like "Rain", Microsoft is responsible for wasting of huge amount of electric power for nothing. Compared to that, finding cure for cancer is useful way to use electric and computing power.

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    24. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The bottom of the laptop can get so hot as to be unusable on your lap;
      > quite possibly, you could shorten the lifespan of your components.

      Yeah, and it probably isn't good for the Laptop either.

    25. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you are thinking of /etc/security/limits.conf ? Renicing will not ensure that the program does not use over X% of the CPU time - only that it will stop hogging the CPU if something else requests processing time. Hard limits in limits.conf is more likely what the parent is looking for - to limit the CPU time to T%. A simple user account with no shell and some visudo edits, and voila - a controlled number cruncher. Moreover, should it be h4X0r3d/b4ckd00rz0r3d/tr0j4n3d, it is running as it's own user and won't do bad things to your other users' stuff.

    26. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please make your applications scalable in % of cpu power used :)

      Folding@home (at least my version of the windows client) lets you select a maximum % of CPU time to use. It will also automatically turn off if your laptop is running on batteries.

    27. Re:Not HAHA by Duds · · Score: 1

      And can you explain to me how I install this on my PS3?

    28. Re:Not HAHA by ajs · · Score: 1

      Wow, been a long time since I was moderated as a troll, and to get modded that way for posting about the chance that Sony would take advantage of the chance to run software on your box.... wow, Slashdot moderation has certainly changed.

    29. Re:Not HAHA by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      You can tell Linux's cpufreq driver to lower the CPU speed when only reniced processes are using it. I used to do this so I could have Folding@home running all night on a 667MHz P4, but they broke the P4 driver in kernel 2.6.16.

    30. Re:Not HAHA by aliensporebomb · · Score: 1

      Is that really a concern? I've ran Seti @ home 100% of the time for over
      six years on a PowerMac G4 and it's still going strong - in fact, the only
      item that needed replacing was a fan whose bearings were shot from all of
      that runtime.

      I think the only concern about "shortening processor life" is people who
      overclock far beyond a reasonable amount.

    31. Re:Not HAHA by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      Wow your one (extremely well built, since it's a mac *G*) computer establishes the behavior of all? It's not just a question of processor life, it's a question of all those little components in there. A well ventilated G4 tower might be able to run bulletproof for years, but a laptop or cheap PC might not. The point is, the heat is enough to bother the guy, and if they gave him an option to limit processor usage, he'd be more likely to help out.

      In my case, it has nothing to do with worry about electronics wearing out - BUT I have a G5 powermac that's liquid cooled, and if that liquid cooling fails it's gonna be expensive to fix. I don't NEED all that processor power most of the time, so I expect to get a long life out of it - if it were kicking 24/7 I might be a bit more worried. Plus, when the processors are really firing, it sounds like a jet is taking off. I'd rather not have that sound droning in the background 24/7.

    32. Re:Not HAHA by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      Afaik deadline-less WU's are genome@home style WU's. At least that's my impression.

      Anyway, it sure might be possible to throttle the cpu usage, I was just trying to say that FAH isn't the best sort of project for doing that. Consider my P3 733Mhz. This machine is on 24/7 and mostly idles. It used about five and a half day for the last completed WU, in other words about 125 CPU hours. The preferred deadline for this WU (after which the WU is considered lost and reissued) was 30 days.

      Considering a laptop which is in use 10 hours a day, that's 30 * 10 * 20% = 60 CPU hours available for it to finish the WU. So like I said, either you need a spiffy laptop (which is not running in a low power state), or you have to leave your laptop on for more than 10 hours a day. Or you miss the deadline and aren't really contributing that much.

      Now, WU's without deadlines is a different thing, and would be much more suited for this sort of thing, I agree.

    33. Re:Not HAHA by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Valid points; I had actually missed that part of your first post.

    34. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The FAH application allows you to specify the maximum CPU utilization percentage. The application will not consume above this limit.
      2. I play games on my PC with FAH running and I have never noticed a slowdown in gameplay due to FAH.
      3. I also have been running FAH on my laptop from work for over a year now. Yes, the fan on the laptop (IBM T-series) is always running, but no it's not loud. Yes, the CPU is pegged at 100% all the time, but no, this has not caused any problems so far.

  11. Double dipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So if we BUY a PS3, and we allow Sony to use the free cylces of my processor, does that mean that if there is a cure found for Alzheimers, other genetic diseases or stupidity, that we as a public will be able to access this new found cure for free? OR do we get our cut? For some reason I think not.

    Please, be a Philanthropist. Let a large megacorporation or partnering pharmacuetical company benifit from this.

    Or save the energy that would have been used for a much more worthwile cause. Powering a megahuge Cray system that could be designed to do it better and faster.

    1. Re:Double dipping? by boingyzain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, you aren't allowing Sony to use your spare cycles, you're allowing Folding@Home (or more broadly, Stanford University's Pande Group) to use your spare cycles. And they are a non-profit organization who releases their findings for free. So, yes, you as part of the public can access the information you helped discover for free.

      Even if Sony WAS a scientific conglomerate trying to find a cure, would you really want to put a hamper on reducing millions of deaths just because you don't want them to earn money? Please avoid discarding your common sense in favor of bashing a corporation you don't like. Oh, wait, this is Slashdot.

    2. Re:Double dipping? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Who "owns" the results? What will happen to them? Unlike other distributed computing projects, Folding@home is run by an academic institution (specifically the Pande Group, at Stanford University's Chemistry Department), which is a nonprofit institution dedicated to science research and education. We will not sell the data or make any money off of it.

      Moreover, we will make the data available for others to use. In particular, the results from Folding@home will be made available on several levels. Most importantly, analysis of the simulations will be submitted to scientific journals for publication, and these journal articles will be posted on the web page after publication. Next, after publication of these scientific articles which analyze the data, the raw data of the folding runs will be available for everyone, including other researchers, here on this web site.


      From the folding@home FAQ.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  12. How the.. by pickyouupatnine · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why would my PS3 being kept turned on 24x7 win my heart and mind again? Because privately held research would like to use my PS3 for free and then make money from it when they discover something - without any intention to charge less $$ for the treatment / cure in exchange for all this free computing?

    --
    _Vishal www.squad9.com
    1. Re:How the.. by kpearson · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you read anything about Folding@home before you started criticizing it? It is run by a public university, not a privately-held organization. The university will not profit from the research. If you can't bother to learn about the project, at least read it's FAQ.

    2. Re:How the.. by recordMyRides · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Pande Group (who runs Folding@home) is a nonprofit set up in conjuction with Stanford University's Chemistry department. They do not make any money from the data they collect. See http://folding.stanford.edu/faq.html#project.own for more information.

    3. Re:How the.. by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Informative

      Leland Stanford Junior University is a private university. Though not a junior university. I can assure you that my loans would all be paid off now if it were a public university.

    4. Re:How the.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Because privately held research would like to use my PS3 for free and then make money from it when
      > they discover something - without any intention to charge less $$ for the treatment / cure in
      > exchange for all this free computing?

      Once a medical discovery is made it doesn't go away. Yes, it is a money tree for YEARS for the company with the patents. YES, a lot of the research was paid for by others. NO, they won't share. YES, they will charge an insane amount for it.

      But a new treatment is A NEW TREATMENT. A cure is a CURE. Stop being so goddamned cynical and take one up the rear for the good of mankind once in a while.

      And yes, I'm serious. Mod me down if you must though, I'll understand.

    5. Re:How the.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the FAQ says that the group running the Fold@home won't make any money off of the data collected. It does not say that organizations which use the data to create medical treatments won't make money off the research. So the parent poster's point is still valid.

      You aren't naive enough to think that any pharmaceutical company who uses the data to develop drugs to treat these diseases is not going to patent the research and charge big bucks for the cures are you?

    6. Re:How the.. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      But a new treatment is A NEW TREATMENT. A cure is a CURE. Stop being so goddamned cynical and take one up the rear for the good of mankind once in a while.

      So it comes in suppository form?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    7. Re:How the.. by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      patent the research and charge big bucks for the cures are you?

      Here are your choices:

      1) Drug company creates new drug based on numbers your computer crunched and they charge you big bucks for the cure.

      2) Miracle drug you need to save your life (or the life of a family member) is not available because no one ran the distributed client.

      What is your choice? Do you pay the money for the cure that exists or do you whine about how there is no cure for your particular disease?

      In addition to donating directly to various cancer-related charities, I run the F@H client at home. The cost of the extra electricity consumed is negligable for me. I consider the small increase in my monthly electric bill to be a "donation" to finding a cure that will help someone someday. If "Big Pharma" uses my data to create a new blockbuster drug (even if they charge big bucks for it), then I've helped future generations.

    8. Re:How the.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello. It has come to my attention that you need to grab a red hot iron and fuck yourself in the ass. Repeatedly. Once you're done with that, rip what little brain you have out of your skull and stomp on it. Thank you, and be sure to fuck yourself often.

    9. Re:How the.. by Silver+Gryphon · · Score: 1

      Agreed. True, those that create the cure out of this data will profit immensely from it for a while. But that profit does get spread out in salaries to the researchers, who spend those dollars at Starbucks and Thinkgeek on caffeine supplies. Thinkgeek can then keep supplying caffeine to Slashdot readers at a low cost.

      Even when translated to geek terms, that has to be worth something.

  13. Guarenteed by Renraku · · Score: 1

    I guarentee that it will be shipped on by default but have an option in the PS3 BIOS to use it during downtime or not. Besides, who leaves their consoles on at all times?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Guarenteed by Gnascher · · Score: 1

      You didn't RTFA, did you?

      You need to actually download the app and install it and allow it to run.

      It's just that Sony is making this an easy process and is endorsing it as a good thing to run on your PS3.

      Don't want to do it, because you think it's a tinfoil hat defeater being installed by the gubmint, then don't install the software.

      --
      It's not my fault! It was this way when I got here.
    2. Re:Guarenteed by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      You really think the PS3 will have a BIOS? Isn't the BIOS just some leftover from the 80s that some computer manufacturers still use because people insist on using outdated software that still requires it? I can't remember the last time I sat in front of a computer that had BIOS, although I guess I've probably used one remotely.

    3. Re:Guarenteed by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not really a BIOS but the PS2 has a GUI bootloader that comes up if you power it on without a disk in the dvd drive. This allows you to change system settings, launch a browser, or check the drive for a newly inserted disk.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Guarenteed by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      In fact I'll lay odds that the app will install and run under Linux, you'll either download the binary from some PS3 community site or if it's source be told to: ./configure && make && make install

      There's a couple of distributed computing clients for the PS2 Linux kit believe it or not.

  14. This Just In... by say__10 · · Score: 1

    Hot off of Ken Kutaragi's desk. "Wii to use down time to skin babies alive." Sony, helping cure diseases. Nintendo, skinning babies alive.

    --
    Home of the midwest loser - www.say-10.net
    1. Re:This Just In... by Cypher04 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of this 'fact'. I am still going to buy a baby skinning Wii.

      --
      "If my doctor told me I had only six minutes to live, I wouldn't brood. I'd type a little faster." --Isaac Asimov
    2. Re:This Just In... by say__10 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I wasn't condemning them for skinning babies. I am pro-skinning babies, 100%.

      --
      Home of the midwest loser - www.say-10.net
  15. My personal opinion by eclectro · · Score: 1


    is that this might be a good idea, if the program doesn't contain a rootkit.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  16. Potential power costs? by David+Horn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know how much power a PS3 pull at full whack, but I reckon it's got to be along the lines of 500W. If they get 10 million people running this during the day, that's an addition 5GW of load on the electrical system. If you own one, and let it run 18 hours a day for the year, then at 20c per kW/h you're looking at $750 on your power bill.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    1. Re:Potential power costs? by mspohr · · Score: 4, Informative
      I guess you are exaggerating to illustrate your point but the power consumption of the PS3 is unlikely to be 500 watts (50 to 100 watts is more likely) and your power cost of 20 cents is two or three times what most people pay (I pay 10 cents in California). Your estimate is probably 10x to 20x too high.

      Yes, it would cost electricity but most likely only a few dollars a month, not $750 a year and most likely wouldn't burn out the electricy grid.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:Potential power costs? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      500W? I don't think so! Maybe if Sony wants to sell it as a combination game console/TOASTER. High-def Blu-Ray English muffins are teh bom!

              50W would be pretty reasonable, 100W would surprise me a bit.

              Brett

    3. Re:Potential power costs? by radish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree that 500W is a little much, but according to this page the 360 takes 145W. I'd imagine the PS3 to be similar.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Potential power costs? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      500W is enormous for a console. How in the world do you expect them to keep it cool? The whole thing isn't all that big. If it pulls more than 120 I'll be surprised, and even that's pretty high. Once you get above 100W just cooling the box becomes a major problem--not that Sony hasn't had cooling problems with their v.1 Playstations in the past or anything, but that would be excessive.

      Hopefully the F@H client won't use the Blu-ray drive, and will have an option to disable the graphics (the TV will be off or not tuned to the PS3 anyway, no point in running the secondary graphics chip). The Cell will be sucking down plenty of juice, but it's actually doing work and helping to stop cancer. You're basically just donating money (in the form of your power bill) to cancer researchers. Weather or not you want to do this is up to you.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Potential power costs? by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      Assuming a 24/7 operation of 150 watts (using 360 as an example) for a year, at 10c/kW/h, that still comes out to $130/year... or roughly the cost of 1 1/2 PS3 games.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    6. Re:Potential power costs? by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Ah, sorry. 145W. Electricity prices in my part of the UK are at best 20c/kWH which is what I based it off. (I say 20c, I pay 14p and can't be bothered looking up the exchange rate.)

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    7. Re:Potential power costs? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Even low-end CPU towers can take 120W. High-end gaming laptops are 140W+. Are you honestly suggesting that with a high-dev DVD drive, hard disk, insane amount of CPU and graphics capability, and the cooling neccessary to fit everything in in a box that size, you'll get away for under 150W? Thank again... I wouldn't be surprised if it hit 180.

      P.S. Gaming desktop systems often have 500W power supplies.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    8. Re:Potential power costs? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      The estimates I've seen for the peak power consumption of the PS3 is around 175W. That's not a negligible power draw. Here in NY I pay 17c/KW-h, so for me to run a PS3 folding machine, I'd be coughing up almost $22/month, or $261 per year. I hope all the children who run this app will get this sum deducted from their allowance!

      BTW, I googled to compare my energy costs to the rest of the country. Here is a useful page. Why am I paying three times as much for a kilowatt-hour as a resident of Idaho? Shouldn't costs per resident be lower when the population has a lower density? Or is it that we're being punished for not voting republican?

    9. Re:Potential power costs? by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 1

      The estimates I've seen for the peak power consumption of the PS3 is around 175W. That's not a negligible power draw. Here in NY I pay 17c/KW-h, so for me to run a PS3 folding machine, I'd be coughing up almost $22/month, or $261 per year. I hope all the children who run this app will get this sum deducted from their allowance!

      Why don't you try to claim it as tax deductable? Just gotta have documentation (hopefully provided by F@H) for how much processing time your ps3 spent folding and deduct the cost from your taxes.

    10. Re:Potential power costs? by mspohr · · Score: 1
      Thanks for that useful link to the page on energy costs.

      The Pacific northwest has very low energy costs due to lots of hydroelectric power (Columbia river system). This is why Google (and others) have decided to site their new server farms in these areas.

      In California, we do feel that were were punished by FERC for being Democrat when the Texas energy companies raped us over electricy prices during our last "energy crisis" (which turned out to be just market manipulation). However, in NYC, I think that you just live too far from cheap energy sources.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  17. I feel like a horrible person... by wbren · · Score: 1

    ... but this doesn't affect my opinion of the PS3 at all. It will be late and wayyyy overpriced. I guess it's nice that Sony is doing this, but anyone can do the same thing without spending $500+ on a gaming console.

    --
    -William Brendel
    1. Re:I feel like a horrible person... by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Informative

      anyone can do the same thing without spending $500+ on a gaming console

      Exactly how would you get this level of performance/watts ratio without spending the few hundred dollars? You'd need to run your current PC much longer to perform the same calculations. From TFA the performance is roughly 100x current capability.

    2. Re:I feel like a horrible person... by robotkid · · Score: 1

      No, wbren is right. The actual performance numbers for the current F@H ps3 build should be similar to late model PPC mac since the Pande group has simply recompiled the gromacs core to run on the Cell PPE (that is the general purpose core of CELL). NONE of the 8 vector processors are being utilized, which are the source for the speculative performance ratios in TFA. When there is sufficient coding expertise in Cell to optimize for all the processors, then it might be significantly faster than a PC, but not before. . . I'm sure the Pande group has this in the works but it won't be ready for the PS3 launch. I think the upstream gromacs developers are working on Cell optimizations but they've mentioned its very, very difficult compared to programming for any other architecture they have come across (these are people who wrote ASSEMBLY inner loops for every major workstation architecture). see http://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/ msg03335.html robotkid

    3. Re:I feel like a horrible person... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Buy the biggest, meanest processor you can find for $400. Buy a cheap motherboard and some memory (256MB would probably be OK, 512MB would be plenty). Grab an ATX case, power supply, optical drive, old PCI video card, etc. from the scrap pile. Build the computer, and set it up with a minimalist Linux distro to do nothing but folding at home. I would set it up with an old USB flash drive myself, and run folding at home from a ram drive, but you could have it boot from CD too, or boot from an old harddrive then spin it down after a few minutes. I would guess that you wouldn't have a problem outperforming the PS3, and the system would probably come out to about 100W, I'm guessing.

  18. Dupe by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Even I know that this is a dupe.

    I don't think I would buy a PS3 for myself unless it was going cure someone I knew of an ailment

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  19. Why cure Mad cow disses? by Forge · · Score: 1

    OK. The other items make sense. However, Why do we need to "cure Mad Cow disses"?

    This is an ailment which only arises when cattle is fed body parts of previously slaughtered cattle. After several generations of meat fed cattle eating meat fed cattle Mad cow disease pops up. This is why after an "outbreak" which the local authorities respond to by burning entire herds the disease seams to disappear for several months or even a couple years before popping up again in another location.

    Cows are not like people or pigs. They were never designed to eat meat in the 1st place. Once we stop forcing cattle into cannibalism, mad cow disease will disappear on it's own.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you're right and we shouldn't be feeding cows to other cows. However, I'm inclined to say that it might be nice if the unfortunate souls who have the disease, you know.... wouldn't die a horrible death. I know it's rare, and should become more rare if we start showing some sense in raising cattle, but, you know... if they could maybe cure it along the way to finding a cure for another disease, I wouldn't consider it a waste of time.

    2. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps because "mad cow disease" (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) is closely related in its effects to a non-beef-consumption-related disorder called Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, not to mention the other disorders mentioned which are also being traced to "bad" proteins.

      Whatever the source of the disease, curing it would be a good thing. We know the transmission vectors of HIV and yet that disease still spreads. Maybe we shouldn't try to cure that, either?

    3. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      No, because bovine spongiform encephalopathy is a prion disease, and can be spread not just through consumption of infected meat, although that is the prime carrier.
      It will certainly bring the disease down to the level where we can ignore it, however.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    4. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by asuffield · · Score: 1
      However, Why do we need to "cure Mad Cow disses"?


      We don't; culling affected cows has always been and will always be a viable solution for BSE, so there is no demand for a cure.

      Whenever the media sees research into CJD, they translate it into "Mad Cow disease". This is nonsense; there is still no proof that they are even related - just a strong suspicion that there is some connection to one particular kind of CJD because they look awfully similar and nobody has come up with a better theory that fits the facts. The "classical" CJD has been confirmed as unrelated to BSE.

      This is research into cracking the puzzle of CJD and a batch of other related human disorders. If it comes up with a cure for BSE as well, it will be unintentional (although not impossible if they do turn out to be related).
    5. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Forge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK. Let's try to cure Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. If Mad Cow disease is cured as a side benefit, great.

      As for the comparison with AIDS. The behavior modifications required are of an entirely different nature. You see, the "culprits" now are individuals, the majority of who are impoverished and under educated with little communications equipment available to begin with. So even getting condoms and the message of responsible sex to them is tough.

      As if that wasn't bad enough the victims are usually the same people and their own families. In other words. They get AIDS because they don't know better and have very limited options. (I have spoken to HIV victims in my own country)

      Mad Cow disease on the other hand is produced exclusively on midsized to large cattle farms in industrialised middle income and wealthy countries. They continue to raise cattle on beef scraps because that's cheaper than using grain and grass. This gives them an additional competitive advantage over the smaller farmers that do not have the equipment necessary for reprocessing cattle scraps.

      None of them stops on his own because that will let the others who continue get ahead in the marketplace. Keep in mind that the farmer I'm talking about here is more often than not university educated. He knows about all the government farm subsidies and makes sure to collect his share. In short, he is fully integrated in a well regulated society.

      If regulations were put in place banning the sale of beef fed cattle or putting an additional tax on it to remove the price advantage the practise would disappear overnight.

      Most importantly, This disease is hitting people who have no way of knowing that this risk exists in a particular slice of meat because gee, It's not even on the package.

      In short.

      Cause of Mad Cow Disease -: people with as much education and more wealth than the average slashdoter selling a defective product. Killing other people.

      Cause of AIDS -: People with limited education and few options following a basic biological urge.

      One can be stopped by a few of earths most stable governments (England, USA, Germany etc...) passing relatively simple legislation (and enforcing it).

      The other cannot.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    6. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Forge · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a further clarification. The Wikipedia page on Mad cow disease lists the countries with infected cattle and/or infected people.

      Interestingly the poorest country on the list is Thailand, with a GDP per capita of $8,300.00 (Middle income).

      Strangely enough they only made the list for the human form of the disease, suggesting that it came from imported beef.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    7. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Forge · · Score: 1

      You make more sense than all the other responses to my post.

      MRD (Mad Reporter Disease) strikes again.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    8. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Vaakku · · Score: 1

      You are mixing Alzheimer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alzheimer and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_cow_disease.

  20. The next supercomputer... by RetlawST · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...will be built using a cluster of PS3s.
     
      This cluster will be able to help cure cancer AND allow Madden 2007 to play an entire season in three minutes.

    1. Re:The next supercomputer... by kpearson · · Score: 1
    2. Re:The next supercomputer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The enlightened gamers of the world then package thirty of them into a redundant beowulf cluster and lower it into a mineshaft so that it can also play all future Madden games for the next ten years and noone else will have to.

  21. The Plot Thickens by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

    The Plot thickens. Now we have a better idea of why the price is going to be so high! We're paying to cure cancer! Well, it must be worth it then! Here sony, take my $600 dollars and my CPU time!

  22. Kindness of Sony's heart by The+Dalex · · Score: 1

    If I had a PS3, it would have a lot of downtime whilst I play on my PC or Wii, so they are welcome to give me one for this important research. I will donate some electricity and bandwidth for this, with the added benefit that I won't have to run a heater this winter!

  23. I can see it now... by le0p · · Score: 1

    "Mom, please give me $600! I want to help cure cancer!"

    --
    "I think that God in creating Man somewhat overestimated his ability."-Oscar Wilde
  24. Good Gesture But Not Enough by organgtool · · Score: 1

    "The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

    Yeah, I'm really going to shell out $600 for a video game system created by a company that has had a lot of problems with their recent technology and then leave that power-hungry video game system run 24/7 so that I can contribute a few CPU cycles for a good cause. I can already do this from my current computer and that is what I'll opt to do. I like the fact that the option exists for PS3 owners and that it will raise awareness of the Folding@home software, but I doubt that this option is going to sell more PS3 systems.

  25. Pass by mac123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm waiting for the project that will have me use all of the spare time for my incredibly overpowered home CPUs (and with it ample amounts of electricity) to 'fight global warming'!

    1. Re:Pass by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      One group is actually modeling climate change using the BOINC distributed client. I don't participate myself, as most of my home computers are old and too slow to run the client-- and I'd rather just switch off the box.

      http://climateprediction.net/

      What is climateprediction.net?

      Climateprediction.net is the largest experiment to try and produce a forecast of the climate in the 21st century. To do this, we need people around the world to give us time on their computers - time when they have their computers switched on, but are not using them to their full capacity.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:Pass by kpearson · · Score: 1

      Wait no longer: climateprediction.net

    3. Re:Pass by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1
      I'm waiting for the project that will have me use all of the spare time for my incredibly overpowered home CPUs (and with it ample amounts of electricity) to 'fight global warming'!

      Why not change to an electricity supplier that uses renewable sources? Seriously.

      I mean, I can and I live in Hicksville, New Zealand so I'm sure you can in most places.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    4. Re:Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're joking, but you should check out EdGCM, a NASA climate model that you can run on your Mac or Win Desktop/Laptop. It is a NASA GCM that has been ported and wrapped in a point-and-click interface.

    5. Re:Pass by brumster · · Score: 1

      If you plan on going truly green you should check your potential supplier's investment record. Many so-called 'green' electricity providers just resell existing hydro-electric power with no actual infrastructure. Here in the UK the only green supplier who invests a sizeable proportion of their profits into building more renewable sources is Ecotricity. Thus no matter how much energy you use you're actually helping the planet. And the planet really does need help.

    6. Re:Pass by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1
      If you plan on going truly green you should check your potential supplier's investment record. Many so-called 'green' electricity providers just resell existing hydro-electric power with no actual infrastructure. Here in the UK the only green supplier who invests a sizeable proportion of their profits into building more renewable sources is Ecotricity. Thus no matter how much energy you use you're actually helping the planet. And the planet really does need help.

      Thanks for the tip, I'll be back in the UK next year. Here, I'm with Meridian Energy who have significant hydro and wind power schemes and are building more wind turbines.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    7. Re:Pass by Isao · · Score: 2, Informative
      That would be the BBC Climate Prediction Project.

      You may sign up now. Arrgh.

  26. When are they going to start worrying about games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough about the $600+ linux box, blu-ray, cell processing, and other junk distracting from gaming. Just start making gaming fun!

  27. Pretty sad marketing statement by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    "One of our best selling points is what we do with the machine WHEN IT ISN'T BEING USED." -- made up quote.

    If I were the competition I'd answer this feel-good non-news press release with the statement, "Unfortunately our game console is so compelling there isn't enough projected downtime to impact world health with our product as there is with the virtually useless PS3."

    Saving the world while idle...who comes up with these things?

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  28. A great idea! by kpearson · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see Sony formalize something which was attempted informally on the PS2. Some distributed computing projects, like Distributed Folding enabled PS2 users to run distributed computing projects on their game consoles. But since users had to install Linux on their consoles and connect their consoles to the Internet consoles, not many users contributed to these projects.

    Now with the PS3, users won't have to know how to install Linux on their console, and won't have to download any distributed computing project software. They can just enable the project software on the PS3 and let it do its thing (and they can watch the fancy screensaver and learn more about protein folding in the process). And if the distributed computing software can be updated, the Folding@home researchers (and hopefully researchers from other distributed computing projects) will be able to learn how to make the best use of the Cell processor.

    1. Re:A great idea! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I see someone has paid attention.

      But I was wondering that this folding client might run under the PS3's Linux. That sony might just point users to a PS3 LInux community site in the documentation and have forums, and binaries like the folding client.

  29. So you need to network this thing? by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

    Was that an intended pun? The Cell processor will soon be processing cellular structures. Yay!

    Seriously, does *everyone* network their console? Because that's usually how these distributed clients work--they download whatever information they need, go to work on it, and then upload the results. So apparently this is only for people who have connected their PS3 to the internet in some fashion? We're not exactly at the point where everybody around can plug a cat-5 cable into something to get broadband, so it seems that this distributed application is only for a subset of PS3 users. Kind of a shame.

    1. Re:So you need to network this thing? by dank+zappingly · · Score: 1

      Hey buddy, if you can figure out a way to cure diseases using gaming hardware without connecting them to the internet, let me know. What do you want it to do, burn the results on a cd and print you out a mailing label for it? I think that many people have wireless internet wherever they are doing their gaming and won't need one of these cat-5 cables you are talking about. There are others who will split their broadband to supply both their computer and their ps3. I'd say that considering that PS3 is incorporating free online gaming into the system, that people with 600 bucks to spend on a system are probably serious enough about technology that they have broadband internet, and might even know how to use wireless internet that the "subset" you are talking about is probably going to be around 90% of the early adopters. Sure, it's not going to be everyone who uses it, but I don't consider the fact that it requires an internet to be as much of a hindrance as you seem to.

    2. Re:So you need to network this thing? by Tim_sama · · Score: 0

      If you can afford a PS3, you have no business NOT having broadband. Period.

    3. Re:So you need to network this thing? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      There's a 24-port 3com switch under the TV in my communal livingroom, and anything that plugs into it gets broadband. And I rarely watch TV. It's just one of those things that people have lying around the house.

      Welcome to Slashdot.

    4. Re:So you need to network this thing? by rochi · · Score: 0

      I may be slightly overprivileged, but cat-5 cables seem to be pretty commonplace in my area (same w/ broadband routers, home wans, etc.) And the people using them aren't even all that savvy, roughly 3/4's of the wans are unsecured. Roughly 2-3 years ago, broadband did become sort of commonplace.

    5. Re:So you need to network this thing? by Manmademan · · Score: 1
      So apparently this is only for people who have connected their PS3 to the internet in some fashion? We're not exactly at the point where everybody around can plug a cat-5 cable into something to get broadband, so it seems that this distributed application is only for a subset of PS3 users. Kind of a shame.

      I shouldn't have to point this out, but gamers tend to have a broadband attach rate that's many, many times higher than the general population. Someone willing to shell out $500-$600 per console and $50 per game isn't likely to be still using dialup unless geography is a factor. (very rural areas, etc.) At minimum, we're talking a number that's in the millions if not TENS of millions worldwide, and at a rate that outperforms even top of the line PC's at doing the same task.

    6. Re:So you need to network this thing? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      All I'm saying is that broadband to the same location as the games consoles (under the telly) is also commonplace now. I suspect it wasn't 2 years ago.

    7. Re:So you need to network this thing? by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

      Well, I shouldn't have to point *this* out, you arrogant asshole, but my point was simply that you need broadband to use this, and that that might pose a problem to some people. That's not an argument, genius, that's an observation.

      Nevertheless, you chose to wipe the Cheetos dust off of your deformed paws so that you could peck out a pithy reply to my innocent observation. Your answer (and indeed everyone else's answer to this ) was that it just couldn't possibly be true that someone could own a console system *without* a broadband connection. Surely I must just be a liar or a crazy person, what with my merely observing that that could be an issue. One guy even offered up that this couldn't possibly be a problem for others because he himself had a broadband connection in his living room, as though his personal circumstances have anything to do with anything.

      Your own claim is that this could never be a problem because "gamers have a 'broadband attach rate' that's higher than the general population," whatever that's supposed to mean. You offer no evidence, no citations to your made-up statistical hunch--nothing. You have nothing to offer us except for this completely unfounded assumption that nobody exists on this planet who has *just* a console system, or could even own a PS3 without also being a broadband subscriber, such that wanting to run this software but being unable to would be an issue for them. I suppose everyone in every country also owns their own personal computer, too, to go along with their own broadband connection? Welcome to Delusion.

      The one thing you seemed to intimate that isn't just totally ridiculous is this: The financial barrier to entry for the PS3 is going to make it a high-tech toy only for the privileged--that is, people who could probably afford broadband anyway. But even then, I just stated that point a lot better than you did anyway, huh? I shouldn't have to point this out, but statistics show that that's the case.

    8. Re:So you need to network this thing? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I've had my PS2 hooked up to broadband since May 31st of 2002.

  30. new slogan by Darth+Maul · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's only a matter of time until they reveal their new slogan: "PS3. Won't somebody think of the children?".

    --
    --- witty signature
    1. Re:new slogan by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that read: "Won't someone think of the old people?"

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  31. Power consumption and reliabilty? by Coopjust · · Score: 1

    To participate, users will just download a program into the PS3's hard drive. Then they just need to leave the machine on when they're not playing. The Folding@home team will divide their complex calculations into manageable chunks and then send it to the participating machines. The program and data will take up 10 to 20 megabytes - or about the size of a handful of MP3 files, Pande said.

    Well, at least it isn't a default, but it significantly reduces the number of people that are likely to use it, especially since the console has to be left on (not just come out of a low power state every few hours). I'm not planning on getting a PS3 but even if I did it would probably eat a lot of power. Plus, if it runs all of the time the reliability will take a hit.

    Since I need to leave my home server on anyway, I'll just put folding@Home on that to crunch while idle.

  32. Gamers unit! by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    You can also use your PS3's downtime to help Sony convince regulators the PS3 is a "computer" and not a "game console" so they get a tax break!

  33. Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would not mind getting a 200$ unit without the BLUE RAY(part that makes the most of the cost) just for that purpose. But lets be realistic, would sony really care?

  34. But! by Goostoff · · Score: 1

    But, but, but, Ken Kutaragi said that the PS3 not a console, it is a computer!

    http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?st ory=9642

  35. PS3 also allows time travel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the only way this 'news' could also appear here...

  36. Gamers Don't Care But the Press Will by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    This isn't going to directly cause anybody (or at least a measurable number of people) to purchase this system as opposed to a competitor. But what it will do it cause the mainstream media to oooh and aaahhh over it a bit more which will help indirectly. It will get mentioned on CNN and such and contribute to a positive feel surrounding a story.

  37. PS3 the perfect contrarian play? by stevesliva · · Score: 1

    There are investors who think that the times when everyone is positive that things are in the shitter for sure is a great time to invest money. Reading this thread, it seems that nearly everyone thinks that the PS3 is going to flop, bit time, and be the next betamax, etc etc. With that being the prevailing wisdom, even a mild success will be great news for Sony. The bar has been set extremely low for the company that had the PS2. Yes, the console biz has a history of colossal failures, but how often has everyone predicted such colossal failure before sales even start? (I dunno... has it happened? It's easy to kick a dog once it's down, but before it's born?)

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  38. sony cures cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but can i still play ridge racer?

  39. Is it tax deductible... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If so, buying a PS3 could pay for itself over time. Seriously, I would signup, have them e-mail me CPU usage statistics muliplied by an industry standard rate as a reciept. They're happy to have CPU cycles, I'm happy to have the tax deduction.

    Now if that's the case, can something similar be done with other CPU cycle donations to other projects? I have a multi-core server that spends most of its time idle. Might as well put to some use, eh?

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    1. Re:Is it tax deductible... by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      I do wonder if you could calculate the excess eletricity used for the process and take that as a tax-deduction ... you'd have the power receipts and the f@h stats (a non-profit) to show the usage.

    2. Re:Is it tax deductible... by Srsen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting idea, but unlikely to work out. Generally, the IRS does not allow you to deduct the value of your "time or services", only cash or the market value of donated assets. Unless there is some precedent I am not aware of, I would think that CPU cyles would be considered "services" and not be deductible.

      Of course, you would also need to be itemizing deductions, so if you don't have a mortgage it is unlikely you could see any tax benefit to a deduction for this anyway.

    3. Re:Is it tax deductible... by Twisted64 · · Score: 1
      I have a multi-core server that spends most of its time idle.
      Make a webpage with a few good-looking 1600x1200 screenshots of a new game, and post a link on a new story here :)
      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
    4. Re:Is it tax deductible... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, CPU cycles are produced as a direct result of the consumption of electricity, which does have a cost associated with it...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  40. My toaster by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

    Oh whatever PS3, my toaster runs calculations to discover a cure for AIDs. My freaking alarm clock is working out the solution to the problems in the Middle East. And my gosh darn massage chair just got an invitation to give a speech at Harvard's graduation ceremony in 2007 on the subject of New Economics in the 21st Century.

    Oh right but yeah my ps3 is working on cancer... whateva. Let me know when it starts mowing the lawn. Now that I could use in a gaming system.

  41. Here's a plan. by steveo777 · · Score: 1
    Do what I do. Plug every home entertainment item into a power strip and turn it off when you're at work. Turn it off when you're in bed. Do the same with your computer set up. Save some power bills. Save a bit of the environment. If I'm not home, my games, TV, stereo, everything is unpluged. Even my power adaptors. I started saving a good $5-10 a month doing that.


    Sure, it makes it harder to do protien-folding calculations and the possibility of curing mad cow disease, but it'll save you a good deal money in the long run. On the other hand, if you feel convicted by not running SETI or F@H, well, then run it. Just my 2 cents.

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  42. Re:Why cure AIDS? by slapyslapslap · · Score: 1

    You can make the same argument that it's almost 100% a disease contracted by behavior. If people would stop doing the things that the contract AIDS from, it would go away, right?

  43. Too Expensive! by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

    Considering the earlier article on power use. I find myself shutting down the 360 very frequently, except in the winter.

  44. Re:Why cure AIDS? by Politburo · · Score: 1

    If people would stop doing the things that the contract AIDS from, it would go away, right?

    Yeah. Damn those dirty babies being born with AIDS. Don't they know better?

  45. On by default? by spud603 · · Score: 1

    If this was on by default and ran in the background while your games were doing non-CPU-intensive stuff (playing cut scenes, paused, selecting your character, etc), I bet they could get a huge amount of processing time just from the people that never even realized this was going on.
    I think any corporation with the kind of market share of Nintendo, MS or Sony should consider doing this kind of thing. A tiny bit of spare cpu-time from a huge number of consoles adds up.

  46. Or from another point of view by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Pro: down time helps fight diseases
    Con: increased polution, from increased coal burning, increases disease risk

    So not sure whether to be happy or not.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  47. Hrm. It would probably be just wishful thinking.. by skids · · Score: 1

    That I had some tiny bit to play in this. I posted this a year or so ago and it gets hits from search engines occasionally. http://abrij.org/~bri/my2c/boincps3.html

    To bad it's not more general purpose a-la BOINC but if I get a PS3, which is a possibility, I'll definitely turn it on. At least in the winter when I have a use for the waste heat.

  48. This isn't good news... by CPE1704TKS · · Score: 1

    Good news is if Sony says they're dropping the price from $600 to $400.

    1. Re:This isn't good news... by BigTunaCan · · Score: 0

      Make that $300.

  49. This is all cool but... by chinard · · Score: 1

    What about some decent games for when im not curing cancer?

  50. Optimistic? by jweob+was+taken · · Score: 1

    "While gamers are in school, at work, or asleep, their system's Cell processor can be used to perform simulations for research organizations."

    Clearly the PS3 will be so addictive that work, school and sleep are the only times its owner will be able to stop playing...

  51. Troll comment by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Yea..but all those fully powered up PS3's (that would be turned off) are using electricity.....

    ----slams troll on head-----

    Quite frankly. If it helps keep my brain from becoming a pile of useless jello I'm all for it!

  52. The Cost by Supergibbs · · Score: 1

    Well for one, as many people have mentioned, the electricity costs of having your PS3 running non-stop. In addition, the wear and tear on your PS3! If you are gonna spend $600 on a PS3, you are gonna want it to work for a long time. Many people leave their computers on 24/7, but I doubt console systems are designed to. Plus my computer stops spinning the HDs.

    --
    First post! (just in case I am...)
    1. Re:The Cost by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Ask the PS2 Linux users:

      http://playstation2-linux.com/forum/message.php?ms g_id=2835

      A month continuous 24/7 isn't a problem at all.

  53. certainly a good idea, but... by silvermorph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not novel. Any net-connected game system is just a new platform for any of the @home projects. They can build a client for download via xbox live or the wii as well.

    The only really good reason for this (besides curing cancer ;) ) is that sony's finally found an app that can effectively exploit the parallel nature of the cell processor. So if clients are released for the other systems, it will look like the ps3 has technological superiority.

    1. Re:certainly a good idea, but... by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Finally! I know from people who develop on the PS3 that are just sitting around scratching their heads, thinking "You know, what can I do with all these extra processing units? I mean, I guess if I had some physics or graphic routines of a highly parallel nature to run with...huh, guess we'll never know what they're for!"

  54. Odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured they'd fight disease by being off, and not driving people into a rage who are thinking "I spent $600 for _THIS_ piece of crap!?"

    Or maybe Sony wanted some positive press to counteract the rootkit that geeks are unlikely to forget for a very long time...

  55. Makes me wonder.. by Klowner · · Score: 1

    Is this kind of stuff driven by Sony's PR dept? I remember before the PS2 was released, there were stories on the evening news about the dangers of them being used for missile guidance systems by other countries, because it was SOOOOOO POWERFUL!OMGZ! Obviously everyone is all anti-war, so now they're playing the "PS3 IS SO POwerFUL IT cUrEZ DISEASES SO FAST!" route. It all seems a little odd to me.

  56. otherwise wasted cycles by dosle · · Score: 1

    great to see things like this available, I'd like my ps3 sitting at home doing this rather than my super-beef 500w water cooled pc chunking out folding packets all day.

  57. Wait? by pkcs11 · · Score: 0

    So to win back the hearts & minds of potential users, Sony is donating our bandwidth & processor time to charity causes?
    Charity is only charitable until it's mandatory, then it's a tax.

    --
    "I have an odd craving to whisper about those few frightful hours in that ill-rumored and evilly shadowed seaport of dea
  58. Sounds like a typical Sony ploy to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know using your PS3 will likely cause it to fail within a year after the warrany period expires. This will obviously lead to even earlier system demises requiring you to fork over money to repair or replace your PS3 on a 6th month (or shorter) cycle. Another win for Sony at the cost of the consumer, eh?

  59. Awesome! by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1
    Well that's TOTALLY going to make games more fun!

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  60. SMOG by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

    In the effort to fold proteins, we fill the air with extra SMOG and further pollute our water, because all of that extra electricity will come from burning coal. Bet they won't mention that part.

    -d

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:SMOG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have the Folding client running on a few systems in spite of the fact that the F@H research could one day be used to help a stupid fucker like you.

  61. Shouldn't this be cancer or something? by kinglink · · Score: 1

    (yes I know folding can help work on cancer)

    Imagine the new ad campaign "600 dollar donation to cancer research, just plug this in!" Anything to avoid having to discuss the games in the first year.

  62. Screw disease cures! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Let's search for those SETI signal bogies! :)

    Cancer! Pffft!

  63. What negativr press? by gnaa323 · · Score: 1

    What's this "serious negative press" that the article claims P3 has gotten?

  64. Ingenious! by 1+(smarterThanYou) · · Score: 1

    Sony is letting us build them one of the greatest distributed supercomputers the internet has ever seen! If only I had the capital laying around to allow all you Slashdot readers to build me a supercomputer (and finacially support its operation by paying the power bill)... What Sony isn't telling us is that they've also partnered with Folding@Home in hopes that this uber-network will solve their major financial woes.

  65. A Better Idea by ffejie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A better idea... Buy a Xbox 360 or a Wii. (Buy em used after a couple of months!) Save yourself anywhere from $200-$400 and donate the money to cancer research, or the F@H project if you really like that project. No, you don't get to have the PS3, but, your $200 will go a lot further for research than your cycles will over a couple of years. Also, take the $25-$100 you'll save on electricity (or whatever people in this discussion have been calculating) and donate that. With the $500 or so you'll give to research over the next 3 years, you'll be able to say for sure that you helped out. And, you get to cut out the middle men (Sony getting cash on the hardware and the Electric Co for providing the electricity).

    Added benefit: Tax write-off! I want to see you try to write-off the additional ~$100 in electricity you're donating.

    --
    Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
  66. Distributed GPU processing? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    What sort of applications would benifit from being distributed, and also being made to use Graphics/3d chip power for their calculations?

    If this is a selling point for PS3; could something like it be a selling point for Physics chips, or that new AI dedicated processor?

  67. Re:Why cure AIDS? by SoapDish · · Score: 1

    No, the key to stopping AIDS is to disallow anyone with AIDS to do stuff that might transmit it. That means:

    No sex;
    No injections;
    No reproducing (therefore no dirty babies with AIDS);
    No bleeding on people's open wounds;
    No getting cut on an object which may cut someone else;
    etc.

  68. It's pretty obvious how this came about.... by ciw42 · · Score: 1

    Picture the scene, two Sony PR guys Joe and Bob are walking along the corridor and into one of the rooms in the engineering department:

    Joe: "We have a problem."
    Bob: "We have lots of problems, which one specifically."
    Joe: "You know, the PS3 one."
    Bob: "Ah, yeah. I was thinking that we could maybe start shouting about how the Wii is going to be a little more expensive than people were hoping. That might make us feel a bit better."
    Joe: "I was thinking that too, but I just wish we could find something newsworthy and positive that we could spoon feed the press. You know, the tabloids that have no real idea about tech. Something that would make a good headline. Something involving babies, or cute animals, or people who are ill, and something that makes shelling out $600 for a games console when people are starving in many areas of the world, seem like a positive and socially responsible thing to do."
    Bob: "How on earth are we going to do that? That just smacks of effort, and you know that anytime we try stuff it just goes horribly wrong. We end up making people hate us, and I've come to realise that it's just best we don't do anything else ever again. I say we just go throw rocks at the ducks in the park again. That was fun."
    Joe: "Hey look at Bill, he's mesmerised. What's that on his screen?"
    Bill: "Oh, hi guys. I'm just looking at this protein molecule rotating slowly on my monitor."
    Bob: "Hey, that's purdy"
    Joe: "What's it all about?"
    Bill: "Well, you know SETI@home, well this is pretty much the same thing, but with fewer aliens and more proteins. You can download it for free, and whilst the only reason I have it is for the pretty pictures it makes on my screen, it's supposed to be helping clever people off somewhere understand proteins, and maybe help to one day cure some disease or something."
    Bob: "Yeah, it is pretty."
    Joe: "Hold on! I've got it!"
    Bill: "What?"
    Joe: "Well, ideally we need something that we haven't had to develop ourselves, 'cause, you know, we tend to screw up pretty much everything we touch these days."
    Bob: "Aha."
    Joe: "Well, we haven't developed this, and this is like, helping the world become a better place or something."
    Bob: "Okay. Your point being?"
    Joe: "We could hitch a ride on the development and infrastructure hard work put in by these guys, compile a version for Cell, ship it with the PS3 and get press release out saying we're saving the planet. And children, and animals."
    Bill: "But, you'd have to keep the thing on 24 hours a day, and that would actually be damaging the planet by consuming large amounts of electricity."
    Joe: "Shut up you and go get the coffees in."
    Bill: "OK."
    Joe: "Anyway, as I was saying........."

  69. Re:When are they going to start worrying about gam by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Games? Even without games they will sell 5 million PS3s, haven't you heard?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. If I can run a C compiler, it's a computer. by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ken Kutaragi said that the PS3 not a console, it is a computer!

    When I can run GCC on it without using rare, expensive add-on hardware that Sony quickly discontinues *cough*PS2 Linux*cough*, then it's a computer. Until then, it's a locked-in console.

    1. Re:If I can run a C compiler, it's a computer. by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linux will be pre-installed on the hard drive in the PS3, no kit needed.

      SCEA didn't discontinue the PS2 Linux kit, they sold their entire stock and just didn't make anymore even though there was demand for it. it wasn't hard to find at all, all you had to do was order it from Sony right from their website. The rare thing about the kit isn't the hardware, it's the discs. If you have those discs you can install Linux on any PS2 with a HD in it.

  72. Still a playstation, still sony by soupforare · · Score: 1

    They're doing this so that their poorly built console dies even faster than it normally would.

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  73. They will do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by suggesting rootkits be installed into everyone's brains

  74. So many features! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Look at these things that the PS3 can do that I can already do WITH MY FUCKING COMPUTER!

    WHICH COST LESS!

  75. Re:Why cure AIDS? by Forge · · Score: 1

    Cuba did essentially that.

    Step 1. Create "HIV compounds" with work, educational, residential, recreational and medical facilities.

    Step 2. Test the entire population for HIV.

    Step 3. Move all infected persons to the HIV compounds and provide them, food, shelter, Medical care and training (where necessary) in one of the jobs that are performed at those locations.

    Step 4. routine retesting of high risk groups, like Havana prostitutes (Winners go to step 3).

    The end result is that Cuba has essentially stopped the spread of AIDS within it's borders. Also, as WTO and UNAIDS will tell you "Early detection + free medicine and adequate nutrition = Long life for HIV victims". They did it via the "backward measure" of imposing a quarantine.

    Before you judge this "repressive action" consider the alternative in places like Haiti and Jamaica (Cuba's closest neighbors and the countries I know best).

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  76. So I should.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spend my money to benefit a corporation that supports the DMCA and getting DRM in media, using power from coal/nuclear sources, so that some pharma can make money off of what I have 'given freely'?

    Yea, I'll take a pass.

  77. Yeah but by OnyxIR · · Score: 0

    Will it run Duke Nukem Forever?

    --
    This sig is licensed under the Free Sig Foundation License, you may re-distribute it as long as you retain this notice
  78. MOD PARENT DOWN, TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason to call somebody an idiot just because they would rather not have something you want so badly. Folding at home has a good goal, but does use more power per calculation than it would were it run on a supercomputer. If this guy is satisfied with his computer and doesn't want to pay a higher monthly power bill, he's fine to not want it.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN, TROLL by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I didn't call him an idiot, I was agreeing with him that anyone that spends $600 do to F@H is an idiot. You can purchase/build at least three PC's (headless/driveless) to do that for that price.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  79. Not for me by r2000 · · Score: 1

    Considering that running dnetc on 3 machines at my place made about a $20 difference to the monthly powerbill vs having them idle at 0% cpu, I hate to think of the negitives of this with the added greenhouse gasses that this decision will create. Also it will mean that PS3s sitting in closed up TV cabinets will still be pumping out heat possibly leading to overheating since noone will want to leave the console sitting out. All up, stupid idea IMO

  80. Signed binaries? by tepples · · Score: 1
    Linux will be pre-installed on the hard drive in the PS3, no kit needed.

    But if the PS3 Linux kernel is modified to use only those Linux executables that have been signed by Sony (as is the case on PSP), and the PS3 bootloader is modified to use only those Linux kernels that have been signed by Sony, then how do I make my own working executables without being a big enough corporation to become a Sony licensee?

    1. Re:Signed binaries? by SETIGuy · · Score: 1
      But if the PS3 Linux kernel is modified to use only those Linux executables that have been signed by Sony (as is the case on PSP), and the PS3 bootloader is modified to use only those Linux kernels that have been signed by Sony, then how do I make my own working executables without being a big enough corporation to become a Sony licensee?
      First thing is to drop an email to Linus saying that maybe GPL v3 isn't such a bad thing. Shortly after GPL v3 gets attached to the GNU toolset, Sony will have to cease providing updates to anything that has made the license switch. Or they will have to allow unsigned binaries to run. It's their option.

      Unfortunately, Linus doesn't mind if you have to run a Sony signed kernel and would apparently like to allow Sony the option of requiring that you use Sony signed binaries. About the only thing you can do is drop him a line and explain, nicely, why you would prefer the ability to run unsigned binaries.

    2. Re:Signed binaries? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Or do it like the proper hackers, and just completely ignore the license and put whatever you want on your system anyways. I agree with you and see where you're coming from, but it's only a (probably short) matter of time before someone really rips into the thing and makes it ignore all of the signing and whatnot.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Signed binaries? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Because it isn't a "locked" kernel, and they're including GCC. Compile whatever you want, enjoy.

    4. Re:Signed binaries? by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's open source, so I think it would be illegal for sony to withhold the source modifications they've made, and with the source it'll be a joke to hack any security on it.

    5. Re:Signed binaries? by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Why not...I don't know...respect the decisions of the company who makes the device, and respect the rules by which you agreed to purchase the product? If you don't like omgomgomgsignedbadbadDRMTWOMINUTESHAAAATE, then don't buy the PS3.

      Their toy, their rules.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    6. Re:Signed binaries? by tepples · · Score: 1
      Or do it like the proper hackers, and just completely ignore the license and put whatever you want on your system anyways.

      If I run a small business that develops video games (large enough to make and sell PC games but too small to be considered by any of the major console makers), and I want my company's games to reach social gamers, can I expect all my customers to hack their PS3s in this way?

  81. BPCZ by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    You really think the Button Pounding Console Zombie masses will really care? People, we're talking about the Wii crowd here... people who want to swing a remote control looking device around in their living room.

      It would take a few hours to explain how a PS3 would fight cancer.

      (playing devil's advocate here, I'm about to get modded -5 Anti-BPCZ)

    --
    FLR
  82. wrongo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heating/cooling cycles aren't bad for electronics! A hard drive spinning 24/7 will die much faster than one starting and stopping occasionally.

  83. Patents. by cesarbremer · · Score: 0

    I would not like to use any kind of cpu time from any computer to help some guys to make a lot of money registering new patents from our hardware work. Is there any compromise to not use any discovered information in new patents?

  84. Weak Marketing by foxalopex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you ask me this is a pretty weak marketing ploy. Consider a few things. First off any console with Internet access could do this. Distributed computing is more about numbers than about individual machines being more powerful. Secondly, basically you're donating power and possibly the lifespan of your system away. What Sony's done is give you a convenient way to donate. If you really cared about cancer research then donate some real money to a Cancer charity. I'm sure some folks will do it but it kind of defeats the purpose of what the PS3 was meant for, a gaming unit.

  85. Attach rate? by tepples · · Score: 1
    it isn't a "locked" kernel

    Then how does Sony intend to recoup its research and development costs? If people start developing and distributing casual games compiled with the public version of GCC, this could cut severely into the PS3 console's attach rate.

    1. Re:Attach rate? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Because "Jools", Nethack, or Maelstrom aren't competing with the commercial games, they're in addition to them. Those little indy puzzle games don't replace boxed games, they supplement them.

      Kind of like Geometry Wars for the Xbox360, or Nintendo's Virtual console.

    2. Re:Attach rate? by tepples · · Score: 1
      Those little indy puzzle games don't replace boxed games, they supplement them.

      Except after reading about the broken mess that is modern Tetris (try ridin' spinners), wouldn't a lot of people prefer, say, Lockjaw?

      Kind of like Geometry Wars for the Xbox360, or Nintendo's Virtual console.

      Except Microsoft gets a cut of every game sold through Xbox Live Arcade, and likewise Nintendo with Virtual Console.

  86. Proprietary bootloader by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, it's open source

    The Linux® kernel is free software, but the bootloader isn't. Likewise, I'm 99 percent sure that the BIOS in your PC is proprietary software.

  87. Contribute to global warming for a good cause! by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

    We are all dying from the heat and the ice caps melting, but we've finally figured out how proteins fold!

  88. Is this the only way to get some of you informed? by faith.is.blind · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PlayStation 3 (Japanese: 3,, Pureisutshon Sur?, trademarked PLAYSTATION 3,[2] abbreviated PS3) is Sony's seventh generation era video game console, third in the PlayStation series. It is the successor to the PlayStation 2 and will compete against Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Nintendo's Wii. The PS3 is scheduled for release on November 11, 2006 in Japan, November 17, 2006 in North America (excluding Mexico, where the console will be released in Q1 2007), and March, 2007 in Europe and will ship in two initial configurations, the main difference being a 20 GB or a 60 GB hard disk being fitted. Sony officially unveiled the PS3 to the public on May 16, 2005 during an E3 conference. A functional version of the console was not at E3 2005 or the Tokyo Game Show in September 2005, although at both events, demonstrations were held on devkits (e.g. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots) and comparable PC hardware, and video footage based on the predicted PS3 specifications was produced (e.g. Mobile Suit Gundam).[3] It wasn't until E3 2006 that games were shown on actual PlayStation 3 systems. In preparation for launch, Sony has announced that there will be 27 playable PS3 titles on show at the Tokyo Game Show in September 2006 on final hardware.[4] On GameFly.com, PS3 games are available for rentals. Contents [hide] * 1 Overview o 1.1 System configuration o 1.2 Release data and pricing o 1.3 Game pricing * 2 Software o 2.1 Games o 2.2 Backward compatibility o 2.3 Software development o 2.4 Interface and operating system o 2.5 PlayStation Network Platform * 3 Hardware Summary o 3.1 Controller * 4 References * 5 External links Overview System configuration System Features Feature Basic Premium Upgradable hard drive Yes, 20 GB Yes, 60 GB Blu-ray drive Yes Yes Bluetooth controllers Yes Yes Flash card reader No Yes Wi-Fi adapter No Yes HDMI port No Yes Silver-colored logo and trim No Yes AV Cables Composite Composite Sony's initial retail strategy for the PlayStation 3 will involve two different configurations that are detailed in a Sony press release.[5] The "premium" version of the PlayStation 3 will come with an internal 60 GB Serial ATA 2.5" hard drive, Wi-Fi connectivity, and multiple flash memory card readers, and features a brighter cosmetic silver-colored logo and trim.[1] The second, alternate configuration of the console will have a 20 GB internal hard drive, but will not feature Wi-Fi, HDMI, or a memory card reader. The hard drive is upgradeable, and memory card and Wi-Fi support can be added through adaptors, but the HDMI support is not upgradeable.[6] The lack of HDMI output in the 20 GB model (as with any HD-DVD or Blu-Ray player lacking HDCP) could potentially cause problems with restricted output resolution on Blu-ray video. An ICT flag can be set by content producers, which forces non-HDCP video down to a pixel resolution of 960×540 (50% greater than DVD-Video at NTSC resolution, and 25% greater than PAL resolution). SCEA president Kaz Hirai stated that it is "too early to speculate at this point" whether movie producers will activate the ICT feature.[7] According to German publisher Spiegel, a behind-the-scenes agreement was made not to enforce the ICT flag on next-generation optical formats until at least 2010, or possibly even 2012.[8] Release data and pricing Release date and suggested retail price by region* Region Expected pricing at release Release date Basic Premium Japan Japan[5] JP¥59,800(US$512) Open price November 11, 2006 United States United States[9] US$499 US$599 November 17, 2006 Canada Canada[9] C$549(US$485) C$659(US$587) Mexico Mexico - - Q1 2007[10] Europe Eurozone[11] (excluding Finland) 499(US$639) 599(US$768) March 2007[12] United Kingdom United Kingdom[13] - GB£425(US$806) Switzerland Switzerland[14] CHF 749(US$608) CHF 899(US$729) Norway Norway[15] - 5000 NOK(US$875) Denmark Denmark[16] 4495 DKK(US$770) 5495 DKK(US$943) Swe

  89. Obesity by DrBdan · · Score: 1

    Maybe Sony can include a research program that searches for cures to diseases that are caused by obesity that are caused (in part) by kids sitting around all day playing video games instead of going outside and getting exercise. Just a thought.

  90. lame by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

    "The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system"

    this marketing stunt is so lame i can't stand. Perhaps it'll cure cancer, but what good is that when hardware this powerful will also be used to control nuclear missiles from menacing countries?...

    [sarcasm]

    --
    I don't feel like it...
  91. Blue ray cracking@ home : ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll join the folding @ home project just as soon as the blue ray cracking @ home project figures out the keys...

  92. solaris scheduler can do it by bolthole · · Score: 1

    FYI: solaris (Sun UNIX) allows you to set up a "custom scheduling class". you can define a process to get no more than X out of Y 'ticks' of the cpu , where you define both the 'X' and 'Y'.

  93. Mad Cow Disease? by Hinde01 · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the group in which Mad Cow Disease is from (prions I think) fundamentally incurable?

  94. electrical cost of F@H on a PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By my measurements using a Kill A Watt, an XBox 360 uses about 170 watts when running full tilt. Let's assume the PS3 will take about the same amount of electricity.

    170W * (24 hours / day) * (365 days / year) * (0.001 KW/W = 1489KWh

    The average cost of electricity in the US is approximately 10 cents per KWh.

    1489KWh * $0.10 / KWh = $148.90

    So essentially, to fold proteins on your PS3 will cost you in the range of $150 per year. Personally, I think this is a foolish application of money. If you want to cure disease then donate the money directly. The researchers can then buy their own PS3s if that's the best thing they can do with the funds.

    If you aren't paying for the electricity, then it's up to you whether to donate $150 from your university, parents, etc to protein folding. Personally, I don't think that's a fair thing to do, but your karma is your own.

    Idle time processing made sense ten years ago when processors were less efficient and generally burned the same amount of electricity whether they were running hard (e.g. playing quake) or "idling". In that case then sure, why not do something useful with the electricity (and cpu).

    But with modern CPUs that power themselves down when idling it no longer makes sense to donate "spare" cycles. Donating spare cycles of a PS3 that would otherwise be off (an extreme form of idle) makes even less sense.

  95. So what's the substitute? by tepples · · Score: 1
    then don't buy the PS3.

    Then what should I buy? What platform without a lockout chip has titles designed to be run with four players' controllers in one machine? If you suggest using four PCs instead, what advantage would four displays give to a game like Bomberman or Ninja Turtles or NBA Jam or Smash Bros., the kind of games that might have appeared in arcades?