Slashdot Mirror


Variety Declares VHS Dead

An anonymous reader writes "Variety has written an obituary for the VHS format only 3 years after it was surpassed in popularity by the DVD." While VHS is hardly the format of choice these days, there are still many, many home movies and other favorite recordings and commercial releases floating around in VHS. How long until VHS players themselves go the way of the 8-track player?

339 comments

  1. hey, wait a minute! by yagu · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the /. summary:

    How long until VHS players themselves go the way of the 8-track player?

    Did I miss the memo? Is there some danger around the 8-track and availability. Please... ... ... click

    ... ..., someone tell me this isn't so! Have I invested all this money on all these artists and their tapes... ... ...click

    for naught? Sigh.

    1. Re:hey, wait a minute! by kabz · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is this infernal light I see before me?

      Will no-one rid me of this flashing clock?

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    2. Re:hey, wait a minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother recently made an iPod case out of an eight-track tape found at a thrift store.

    3. Re:hey, wait a minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just glad I'm young enough to not get that joke =)

    4. Re:hey, wait a minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it just me our does slashdot need to update its css? i love this site regardless of how it looks smell me, but right now it looks mid 90s ya digg? does anyone here smell me? this site is phat but needs a facelift. ya digg ya smell me ya know? smell me? digg? (anyone guess who im imitating?)

    5. Re:hey, wait a minute! by srk2040 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I still listen to my 8-track player from time to time. As for VHS, you know VHS will survive for a long time because VHS was the choice of format for porno and I doubt Debby Does Dallas will be re-released on DVD any time soon.

    6. Re:hey, wait a minute! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Former Canadian Prime Minister Kim Campbell?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  2. Netcraft?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh

  3. Consider the source... if you can understand them by tverbeek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'll start listening to Variety about contemporary trends as soon as they drop that inane, out-dated hipster lingo that they use instead of the English language.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  4. the real question by User+956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long until VHS players themselves go the way of the 8-track player?

    With the cost of storage plummeting and the rise of digital distribution and on-demand services, the real question should be: "How long until physical distribution of media goes the way of the 8-track player?"

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:the real question by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My former boss has been predicting the death of physical media since the early days of the CD-ROM, when the internet started becoming commonplace. One of these years I'm convinced he's going to be proven right.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:the real question by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, And I'm still waiting for the promised "paperless society".

      --
      What?
    3. Re:the real question by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      Well only about 16.7 percent of the world's population has access to the internet. So a while.

    4. Re:the real question by achacha · · Score: 1

      DVD is dying, torrents to portable/mass storage and On-Demand are the new direction. I estimate current DVDs will die in 3 years, replaced with HD-DVD or better. Eventually we will be buying hash ids that will be saved on our portable devices to allow us to view on demand anything we want via streaming.

    5. Re:the real question by LindseyJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you need an example of why we're not ready for a paperless society (or even an example of why it may just be completely unworkable altogether), look no further than Diebold.

    6. Re:the real question by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      "I estimate current DVDs will die in 3 years"

      2010 called, they want their comment back :)

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    7. Re:the real question by El+Torico · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where's my flying car?

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    8. Re:the real question by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coming soon I believe - I have a VHS promo video somewhere round here...

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    9. Re:the real question by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well only about 16.7 percent of the world's population has access to the internet. So a while.

      and how much own a dvd player??

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:the real question by rynthetyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, that's for sure. I still don't know who my new US Congressperson is going to be, and it's all the fault of the county south of me thinking that touch screen voting machines were a good way to go. Now, thanks to the fact that there were 18,000 fewer votes in that race than there were people who voted overall, we're in for the loser putting us through the long protracted court battles that Florida is becoming known for. I might be the voting machines going haywire, it might be that 18,000 people decided they didn't want either bum (the reason I didn't vote for either of them), but since there's no paper trail, there's no way of knowing.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    11. Re:the real question by timeOday · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder what percent have VCRs?

    12. Re:the real question by Da_Weasel · · Score: 5, Funny

      VHS has been dead for at least 5 years. I distinctly remember having to explain the totally foreign concept of rewinding a tape so you could watch it again to my oldest daughter when she was almost 6 (5 years ago). After she finally understood why the tape retained it's state she simply replied "That's dumb!". I heard the VCR gasp, then it reached for its chest, and collapsed to the ground clinching its heart in its hand. It's clock flashed twelve faster. I leaned closer to hear what the VCR was mouthing to me. "B be be kind, rewind..." And then it's clock flashed no more...

      --
      If you must!
    13. Re:the real question by mc2thaH · · Score: 1

      What's a VCR?

    14. Re:the real question by RicktheBrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When do you think one can download a movie for less than the cost of renting one at a video store. I can rent a recent movie for $3 and keep it overnight. It will be viewed more than once during that time so unless they increase the speed of downloading so one can watch the movie instantly and have a price of say $1 per view than I would not be interested. I think that vhs tapes are better than dvd disks too. I can give my 4 year old a tape and not have to start it up for him. DVD's usually require a menu entry to start them and if they get dirty from handling they will freeze in the middle of the movie. One has to take the disk out and clean it and than try to fast forward to the point where it stopped. One can stop a tape and take it out and give it back when other things are done with and the tape will just continue at the point where it stopped. I would think that parents of young children should be enough demand to keep tapes going or so I hope.

    15. Re:the real question by tm2b · · Score: 0

      At your nearest airport.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    16. Re:the real question by tilandal · · Score: 1

      There is nothing to stop a DVD player from just picking up where it left off. Cheaper players wont have this feature of course but im sure nicer players do. As for running a DVD, I find children firgure it our faster then adults.

    17. Re:the real question by Martz · · Score: 1

      and how many have access to adequate water and sanitation??

      That would be an amazing technology for 2.6 billion people in the world. Thats 40% of the worlds population who do not have access to adequate sanitation.

      Interestingly, 16% (1.1 billion people, 1/6th) of the worlds population, don't even have access to safe sanitation.

      You really think they care they're not on the Internet or own a VHS/DVD player?

      http://www.wateraid.org/international/what_we_do/s tatistics/default.asp

    18. Re:the real question by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      2011 called, they want their quantum entanglement antetemporal communications back

    19. Re:the real question by Elshar · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. My kid is 7 now, but he started using the dvd player when he was 4-5. He figured out that if it doesn't start when the menu comes on to press the |> button on the remote and it'll play (Imagine that). He also learned that if it won't play to take it out, clean it and put it back in.

      People don't give small children enough credit. The kid could've probably done it himself when he was younger, I just never let him. As it is, I still supervise what he's trying to stick in there and how.

    20. Re:the real question by Elshar · · Score: 1

      Really wish /. had an edit feature sometimes. But I also wanted to throw in that the kid knows how to rewind, fast-forward, skip-forward/back, and how to use the loop feature (Unfortunately) of the dvd player. He also knows how to change the language, and how to make the subtitles come on/off. And he's been able to do this for a long time now. Don't see how it's harder than vhs. If anything, it's faster and easier.

      Overall the disks might not be very durable, but in the destructive hands of a small child I think they're MORE durable. Soon as they get that tape out of the cassette.. If you're not right there to stop it, you could (and I have) walked into a room covered with tape. Oh, they really like that. Magical string dispensor.

    21. Re:the real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With the cost of storage plummeting and the rise of digital distribution and on-demand services, the real question should be: "How long until physical distribution of media goes the way of the 8-track player?"


      Coaxial cable is a long way from reaching everyone who wants high speed internet. And DSL never will reach them all... sigh, high speed data over UTP who's friggin bright idea was that? And it will be decades if not centuries until fibre replaces the copper networks.

      So in answer to your question I would say at least 100 years, more likely 2-300 years.
    22. Re:the real question by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Far be it from me to question the wisdom of your 5 year old daughter, but it's not "dumb" - it's brilliant. Thats the one thing I miss about VHS in the DVD age - having a way to reliably save your place, without navigating through chapter menus and trying to remember which chapter you last watched from the little thumbnails.

    23. Re:the real question by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      The demand is there though - see this article about illegal video dens in Kenya. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6152074.st m

    24. Re:the real question by bigpat · · Score: 1

      I might be the voting machines going haywire, it might be that 18,000 people decided they didn't want either bum (the reason I didn't vote for either of them), but since there's no paper trail, there's no way of knowing.

      I often don't vote for the candidates that are presented by the parties when I am not satisfied with the choice or lack of choice. I have begun writing in candidates when this happens to avoid any confusion, but I wonder if a "no vote" option could be made available to make clearer the intent of the voter.

    25. Re:the real question by profplump · · Score: 1

      Not ready, sure. Unworkable, not so much.

      You don't need the output from the machine to be paper. If the machine copied a plain-text, cryptographically-signed copy of your ballot to say, your PDA/USB drive/cell phone/etc., that would provide an out-of-band, voter-verifiable record of the transaction, with superior tamper resistance than a plain paper ballot. It would even allow voters to take home a copy of their vote, and to verify election results independently of the official count, which cannot be done with paper balots.

      Of course, not everyone carries a device appropriate for such a transfer, and so paper is a reasonable choice at this point. But the concept of paperless voting is not unreasonable -- just the concept of receipt-less voting.

    26. Re:the real question by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      My 6 year old sony dvd remembers where it left off for the last 6 discs inserted. My cheap as hell car cd player picks up right where I switched off the ignition. Disc players that don't have this feature suck.

    27. Re:the real question by Kelson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, that's for sure. I still don't know who my new US Congressperson is going to be, and it's all the fault of the county south of me thinking that touch screen voting machines were a good way to go.

      A lot of it has to do with the specific type of voting machine used. I've heard stories of some really bad designs from people who voted in different areas last week, but it can be done...not necessarily right, but at least better.

      The machines that my district has used for the last ~2 years are pain to use (basically a click wheel, and the display is slow enough you can watch it drawing rectangles), but at least have some measures against fraud. For instance, activating the machine requires a single-use passcode that's generated by the control unit and handed to you by the official running that station, so you can't sneak into an unused booth when you're done and vote again. (Not that this would have been possible where I was. They were watching the booths like hawks waiting for one to free up so they could get people through the line as fast as possible. It was the most crowded midterm election I've seen since I started voting in 1994, unless you count the 2003 California governor recall.)

      Most importantly, each voting machine has a roll of paper inside like the store copy in a cash register. When you finish your ballot, it first gives you a chance to review your choices on-screen, then it prints them out on the paper roll, which is visible through a plastic window. You have one more chance to confirm that the paper copy matches what you actually chose, then it accepts your vote and rolls the paper out of view.

      With that type of machine, even if the memory gets wiped by a power outage, there's still a paper record that can be examined.

    28. Re:the real question by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the paperless bathroom...

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    29. Re:the real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being able to take home a copy would render the anonymous part of voting useless. Cue the "wheres is your printout so i know not to break your knees for voting the 'right way'" peoples.

    30. Re:the real question by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      People have a hard enough time driving cars without causing accidents and they tend to stop when there is a major problem. Having personal planes flying around with the possibly interfering with current air traffice and the habit of crashing when they have a major problem are two reasons why there isn't a market for flying cars. Can you even imagine having to get a license and liability insurance for a personal plane?

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    31. Re:the real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My XMBC install on an xbox is used by my non-technical significant other to play recorded TV shows. It automatically remembers where you stopped and picks up playing from there - very handy. Easy to use = "power on xbox, select videos, select show".

      Also nice in that if you stop during the credits, and next time can't remember which show you were on, you'll know if you've seen the show already if you see the credits rolling when you start playing.

      Then there's the 30 second skip button (and 10 second back button).

      She's stopped using the VCR for anything except the occasional old video or workout tape, and those leftovers are wearing out. We won't be replacing the VCR. It's cheap to by a DVD players that plays divx now too...though I'm not interested in burning stuff to DVD, personally.

      Hmm ... I believe if you press play instead of using the selection button on the remote, it starts from the beginning of the show anyhow, but I don't remember offhand.

    32. Re:the real question by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Not if you turn the player off, and certainly not if you remove the disk - but then again, I was an "early adopter", so my DVD player is pretty old. Maybe the new ones are smarter.

    33. Re:the real question by spitzak · · Score: 1

      In this case it is believed the screen layout made it very hard to see the question. I saw a picture and it took a long time to see what was wrong, as I really could not see the race. Apparently it was on the second screen, near the top, with two lines, followed by a large title in color that says "STATE" and followed by a much larger race of 6 contestents. Your eye is immediately drawn to the larger block. Don't know where the picture is.

      In any case I think the belief is that the machines are reporting exactly what people voted. I'm unsure if a paper trail would fix it, but if it printed the blank entries maybe a few more voters would notice that they did not vote in that race and fix it.

    34. Re:the real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though the disc-less record store sure seems to have caught on.

    35. Re:the real question by achacha · · Score: 1

      Current DVD is the 4.6GB format, next gen is HD-DVD whichever standard they settle on.

    36. Re:the real question by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Yea, and I predict that the current DVD standard won't die for another 7-8 years, not 3. Those things are everywhere, and they'll be popular for a bloody long time yet. Look at CDs- still the best way to buy your music.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  5. Allready been there. by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

    How many people have said this now? Its like OK PEOPLE VHS IS DEAD....6 months later...OK PEOPLE NOW ITS REALLY DEAD.....a year later someone ELSE will come out and say it. Its never oficially dead it just more and more gets less used.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:Allready been there. by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, what I take as a pretty serious indicator is the fact that the prices of VHS tape drives is rising, due to the economies of scale going away. Surveillance customers who were buying machines for $300/unit in January are paying upwards of $500/unit now.
      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  6. Edison Cylinders by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...also dead.

    1. Re:Edison Cylinders by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah, They Might Be Giants recorded I Can Hear You on one of them. It's still a great format. ;)

  7. Hey!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!! I get /. on VHS!! No way this format is dead yet.

  8. remember tapes? by alta · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I used to type the programs out of the little spiral book into my comodore. Then I'd type some command to save, and push record on the tape deck.

    Oh yeah,
    Load "*",8,1

    I never new really what that meant, but i knew the result was I could get a list of all the programs on the disk, and then i could run defender! Or Zork!

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:remember tapes? by Depili · · Score: 1

      Accually, you needed load "$",8 for the listing of programs, load "*",8,1 just loads the first program :)

    2. Re:remember tapes? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I wrote a 'full screen editor' (well, one full screen) for the TRS-80 Model 1. Mine had only the cassette port, so you could run my program, then type in a full screen of text, with full cursor control to move around on the screen, then there was a key sequence to store your text to cassette. I think it took a little more than a minute to store or retrieve that screen of text.

      Fun times with tbug, in the olden days.

    3. Re:remember tapes? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I still have one test fixture at work that runs on a Portable Commodore 64 (an SX-64). I have to type that 'load "*",8,1' command to load the program off disk. It's hard because some of the keys don't respond well and have to be hit hard, then the multiples backspaced away. I'm planning on replacing the commie with a Pic controller on a little circuit board someday soon, but it will be a sad thing, retiring one of the last commies still in commercial use in a test lab.

    4. Re:remember tapes? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! I could never get the tape deck to work with my ZX80 (that's ZED-EX-ATEY) and I had to type in my programs every time I restarted. Can you imagine what it was like to develop machine code having to type in my hex loader afresh every time the thing crashed. But develop code I did. I even got my epic 23 byte program published in a magazine.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:remember tapes? by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Clean the keyboard. Really. That's all it needs.

    6. Re:remember tapes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but be specific; you mean the inside of the keyboard needs cleaning! :)

    7. Re:remember tapes? by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like a case of keyboard membrane death. ZX Spectrums, of which I'm a fan, had the same problem and many a speccy user, moreso 48k users I think, had to replace their membranes.

    8. Re:remember tapes? by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      I had a ZX81 and they never improved that. :) The thing had nearly as many crashes as a Windows 95 PC on high load. Did you build your ZX80 from kit?

    9. Re:remember tapes? by Zedrick · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of: load"$",8

      Load"*",8,1 will load the first file on a disk.

    10. Re:remember tapes? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Oh no! I couldn't have been trusted with a soldering iron at that age!

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    11. Re:remember tapes? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      When the company scaled back the labspace recently, I brought home all but that one SX-64 machine. So when I get around to going through the four systems that are now mine, I will keep your tip in mind if I find the keyboards similarly flaky. Also I'll see if I can find the time to clean the keyboard in the unit at work. Somehow I had gotten the opinion SX-64 keyboards were difficult to maintain.

  9. More like the cassette than 8-track. by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Still around, still useful, just not commonplace.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Still around, still useful, just not commonplace.


      Hmm, I wonder how commonplace it is. I still use mine. Not so much to watch movies, but I will record things and watch them. I just don't have that big of a desire or need to get a DVR. I had a friend that used his VCR a LOT. He had probably 100 video tapes of things he had taped that he needed to watch. He upgraded to TiVO, and now he has a more compact way of recording things that he never watches. I honestly don't know what people are recording. I watch about 3 shows, and if I miss them, I miss them - whooptie doo. I just can't really justify the cost of a DVR. But then again, I don't understand why people spend $1200+ on a television, or $300 on a video card for their computer.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    2. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Taping with the DVD recorder does not feel as "safe" as with VHS.
      We have a recorder here and often I wonder if the old model was better designed for the task.
      It was rare a tape just broke.
      Sure, it would get slowly grainy and you could basically get one final watch out of them.
      The DVDs suck because one error can fuck up the entire show.

      I hope NTL hurry up and bring out a PVR.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Funny

      But then again, I don't understand why people spend $1200+ on a television, or $300 on a video card for their computer.

      These days, people spend $300 on a video card so that six months later they can replace it and wire the little fan from it onto an old USB cable and make a USB fan to blow cool air at them when they're playing whatever FPS is in vogue.

    4. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The players still seem pretty commonplace, and the media is still readily available. I just reused my tapes.

      I think tonight I am going to just stick a $150 eyeTV hybrid on my satellite box and forget about the VCR, I forgot to change the tape two nights in a row.

    5. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just recently spent $300 on a video card. I don't usually do it, but I had the money and the timing was right. Hopefull it will last a few more generations than my last card did. If it doesn't, then it was a waste.

      And DVRs are relatively inexpensive. Your cable or satellite provider will give them to you for free; unfortunately they hit you with a monthly subscription service (mine is $5), so it's not that great a deal. My DVR has an ESATA port, so I could hook up a hard drive to it for lots more room (it only ships with 60GB). I used to be in the same camp as you, but after I got a DVR my mind changed. It's just one of those technologies that you don't realize you need until you have it. It's not the best thing since sliced bread, but it is incredibly convenient.

    6. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Snwbeast · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend sold her old VCR in our garage sale a couple months ago. The guy who bought it asked about the original box (which she still had) since he wanted to ship it home to India. He said VHS is still incredibly popular there but you cannot buy players anymore, so he was out hitting garage sales to buy all of them that he could. Just because people don't think they are useful in the US doesn't mean the rest of the world isn't looking for them, even used...

    7. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by antdude · · Score: 1

      One error? Like what? I thouhgt hiccups would result unreadable spot that can be skipped.

      I was planning to get a DVD recorder instead of a DVR/PVR if my old VCR ever dies.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Kyokugenryu · · Score: 2, Funny

      You say this as if there's something wrong with it.

    9. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Inexpensive? I don't think so with the subscription. I don't have cable and satellite, nor do I want it. I just over the air (OTA) antennae for my TV shows. I would like a digital recorder. I use a HDTV tuner card for my computer. It's OK (not that stable) like a dedicated hardware machine (e.g., VCR/PVR/DVR).

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    10. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by dthree · · Score: 1

      Too bad there is only a 50% chance it will work. They are on the PAL system there but some TV's work with NTSC as well.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
    11. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sometimes it can resync, sometimes it can't.
      We have had programs showing up lasting -96 hours (or similar unrealistic figures) which were completely unusable.

      Mind you, this seems no different to the experience I have had with dvd-rw's.
      YMMV

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    12. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Interesting. How often does this problem occurs? Hmm, maybe I don't want a DVD recorder then. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    13. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by ben+there... · · Score: 2, Informative

      For some more anecdotes: I record shows on my comp using SageTV, and toss the DVDs in a pile, sometimes on the floor. Then step on them. Every single one of 150+ still plays without even skipping. Some take longer to read after popping them in, but no biggie.

    14. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again, I don't understand why people spend $1200+ on a television, or $300 on a video card for their computer.

      Because they have more money than you.

    15. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Some=most If a decent TV made in the last 10-15 years doesn't support NTSC it should be taken outside and beaten.

    16. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Oh ho, didn't you ever have tapes that when you ejected them you heard that "oh god I didn't hear that" crinkling noise, the door of the deck opens and nothing comes out. Doom.

    17. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Or not. That's where over-extended credit and bankruptcy come in.

    18. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmm, I wonder how commonplace it is. I still use mine. Not so much to watch movies, but I will record things and watch them.

      I use one extensively to record stuff off of PBS radio. Just turn the radio on, cable it to an audio input, then set the vcr to the time you want to record. You get a blue screen with up to 6 or 8 hours of audio, depending on tape length.

      However, this is becoming less necessary as more of the programming is becoming available as individual podcasts or as RSS streams.

    19. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      My USB fan has a USB-capable microcontroller in it so it can tell the host how much current it will draw and therefore actually BE A REAL STANDARDS-COMPLIANT USB DEVICE, you insensitive clod!

    20. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      >>I hope NTL hurry up and bring out a PVR.

      They have. Got some promotional material thru my door about it yesterday.

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    21. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The set top recorder unit uses RW disks which appears to be where the problem comes.
      I've never had any issues burning dvd data or movies onto write once media.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    22. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by geodescent · · Score: 2

      Once you see how often a crappy $100 recorder ruins a DVD, you'll know...

    23. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yes, but those could be easily repaired, if at the expense of a mini-snowstorm in that part of the tape. DVDs that don't read are useless, and even minor scratches and imperfections can render a user-recorded disc unplayable in many machines.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    24. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by slashbart · · Score: 1

      > I honestly don't know what people are recording. I watch about 3 shows, and if I miss them, I miss them - whooptie doo. I just can't really justify the cost of a DVR. But then again, I don't understand why people spend $1200+ on a television

      Amen brother! 250 is about my max budget when my current 10 year old TV dies; but fortunately it's still going strong (except that the videotext overlay brightness is too low :-)
      I really don't see understand the compulsion to actually put an effort into watching the idiotbox; it's only purpose is to induce alphawaves into the brain when you are tired.

      Bart

    25. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by gosand · · Score: 1
      I really don't see understand the compulsion to actually put an effort into watching the idiotbox; it's only purpose is to induce alphawaves into the brain when you are tired.

      Don't get the incorrect impression that I am one of those TV haters. I LOVE television. I even indulge in crap shows on occasion. But I don't let it rule my life. There are only a couple of shows I try not to miss. The good thing about cable is that they re-run lots of shows I like. You can catch The Daily Show, Colbert Report, and the Food Network shows often. Other than that I watch The Office, Simpsons, and catch Biker Build-off here and there, there isn't much else I want to watch. I know people who let TV run their life. I have found if you just make it a point to not watch some of that stuff, you really aren't missing out on anything.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    26. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by nanojath · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that both cassette and VHS are not dead but essentially stagnant medium. When the old Samsung finally cacked out the other day, I headed down to Target and picked up a new VHS player (the sole stand-alone model they stocked at that moment, incidentally) without a second thought. I didn't even consider just abandoning VHS.

      My tape collection is still significantly bigger than my DVD collection, and I expect it to last 10-20 years. Also, for a person like myself who has regular but not particularly intensive recording needs (i.e. I'm not timeshifting the broadcast stream like your Tivo set but I regularly want to save something I'd otherwise miss or would like to see more than once) VHS is a very cheap option. Another point of view: I just checked the DVD category at Amazon - 158,444 results. VHS category - 199,244 results. Not bad for a dead format.

      So I think it will be a long, LONG time before VHS players are as rare as, say, record players - and even longer before it is impossible to buy a new unit as it is with 8-track or Betamax. Hell, I still own a working 8-track, just for fun, I even play 'em sometimes. Some of that legacy equipment was built like tanks, it's amazing how it holds up. I think that's an interesting angle - will it be easier to force a transition on, say, DVDs - because so much more of the equipment base is cheap-jack crap? (My first DVD player lasted 1/3rd as long as my first VHS player).

      On the other hand, there's no denying that new VHS prerecorded tapes have little to no shelf space in the big box retailers and the major rental places are getting out of VHS fast, if my local market is any indication. This is very much like the latter days of the cassette, which is still not truly dead. But then again, I bought my last new, prerecorded cassette tape I think around 2000. I sold off my cassette collection (oh the youthful memories) just this year when I realized it had been a couple years since I had listened to any of them. But the used music store bought them all the same, albeit for a pretty paltry sum, maybe a quarter a pop for the non-rare stuff.

      The only reason I own a cassette player any more is that I'm still digitally encoding a few irreplacable fragments of tape, old home recording stuff from the 4-track days. When this one wears out I probably won't replace it. Now, the CD pretty much started its reign back around 1988... so it has taken a guy like me, very much not an early adopter who was heavily invested in cassettes, almost 2 decades to get out of them, and it will be over two decades before I abandon the medium entirely. I think things have accelerated in technology transfer but not THAT much. VHS has a good decade or so in it yet, is my guess.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    27. Re:More like the cassette than 8-track. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VHS compared to 8-track. I have a bunch of these and have transferred the sound to other
      media. 8-tracks used a single reel design that peeled the tape from the inside of the reel next to the spindle, ran it past the R/W head, and then wound it back onto the outside of the reel. It was a huge loop. The problem was that every time it was stripped from the inside near the spindle, it wore a bit of it away. It also would tighter wind the reel gradually until it would not come out any more. It would 'drag' before it refused to play or broke from the strain. Usually when it broke, it was at the drive capstan which thereupon would wind up a few feet of the tape onto itself and mangle the whole knotted mess. It was a ghastly design that sold well because of convenience of use and ignorance of its weaknesses. As those weaknesses became known, people left the format in droves except for rednekks who seemed to perversely enjoy stupidity.
      The VHS are totally different. They do not 'rewind' themselves, and are resistant to crooks.
      It is very difficult for a crook to limit your use of your own VHS, and digital codes, broadcast flags, DRM, Crippleware, subscribeware, nagware, thiefware, etc. are really not
      possible to enforce on a VHS...or sony betamax tape. The tape medium when well done simply cannot be made to steal your money unless you leave it in the sun on your car dash in Darwin
      some nice bright January day. VHS will really be around forever. The cassettes will certainly last literally forever. I have 10 brand new players in boxes and 6 cases of blank tapes to use when my existing player fails and when repair people are required by law to report I possess one. Why would I ever want to shell out big bucks for a 'TiVo' player that some filthy monopolist can reach his grubby hands into whenever he wants. Why would I ever want to have
      to beg some putrid monopolist for my rights to record anything off the public airways. TiVo manufacturers can take their boxes and take them to Tehran and sell them in person on a public street,,,,,heh....heh....heh...see what the Iranian Kulture Kops think of them then.

  10. VHS? Dead? by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, as long as I have a huge collection of videos with films and stuff recorded off the TV, and until a usable alternative for recording from the TV that I own and control becomes available, VHS is going to be in my house for quite a bit longer.

    I suspect that film studios would like to see the back of VHS and any format that allows easy recording, but it's what people want and why it really accelerated into such a popular format.

    1. Re:VHS? Dead? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Although I have an extensive library of VHS tapes for which I'll "always" need a VHS player, I stopped using it to record off of TV shortly after I bought a TiVo a few years ago. Feel free to substitute a MythTV system if you wish, but I know that I would already wouldn't miss having a VHS recorder.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:VHS? Dead? by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Huge collection?!?

      Torrent???

      Bemopolis

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    3. Re:VHS? Dead? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you can't own and control a DVD writing DVR? You can't control MythTV or any other open software PVR solutions?

    4. Re:VHS? Dead? by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Give it a couple years. HDMI? Broadcast flag?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    5. Re:VHS? Dead? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      And VHS will help you how? If the broadcast flag or HDMI actually happen and prevent a DVD-recorder or a Tivo or a Myth box from recording, what magical technology will spare the VHS recorders?

    6. Re:VHS? Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So your VHS recorder doesn't contain Macrovision (the first DRM)?

    7. Re:VHS? Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the fact that the existing sea of VHS recorders are analog-input devices incapable of honoring any new "broadcast flags" or other DRM that they're unable to detect?

    8. Re:VHS? Dead? by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Much like existing DVRs, DVD recorders, cable boxes, and PC TV tuners. If you've got an analog source, none of it matters. There's nothing separating VHS from anything else out there that records from an analog input.

    9. Re:VHS? Dead? by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      One word. Macrovision.

    10. Re:VHS? Dead? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      And Macrovision has what, exactly, to do with recording to VHS vs. recording to any other device? Why would a VCR be spared where a Myth box would not?

    11. Re:VHS? Dead? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Two words. "Video stabiliser".

    12. Re:VHS? Dead? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Actually that would be ARM.

  11. 8-Track by subreality · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually suspect VHS won't go the way of the 8-Track. 8-Track has a small cult following that's endeared to it because of it's impractical quirkiness. No fast forward, no rewind. You wanna hear your favorite song again? Wait for it to work its way around.

    VHS, on the other hand, didn't have any cute annoyances. It wasn't a great standard, but it had no major drawbacks. And for that reason, I don't expect it's nostalgia to hang on nearly so long.

    1. Re:8-Track by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      You can jump from track to track on an 8-track, so you're never more than a few songs away from your favorite.

      I've actually resisted becoming an 8-track fanatic. I've seen good 8-track recorders come up at auctions and just sat on my bidder's paddle to avoid ending up with them. I suspect there are spare tapes available somewhere. You could record tunes off CDs to 80-track. I recently got a 'bonus track' on a BlackCrowes album I bought at WalMart. The slip of paper in the jewel box said to go to the Walmart site and download it, so I did. It was a WMA file so I had to download and install Windows Media Player 9 on a machine here that still runs Windoze to burn the file to an audio CD. Now that Black Crowes track ("Lovin' Cup") is ready to rip to MP3, and if I had the gear, ready to record to 8-track.

      Oh well.

    2. Re:8-Track by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've actually resisted becoming an 8-track fanatic. I've seen good 8-track recorders come up at auctions and just sat on my bidder's paddle to avoid ending up with them. I suspect there are spare tapes available somewhere. You could record tunes off CDs to 80-track. I recently got a 'bonus track' on a BlackCrowes album I bought at WalMart. The slip of paper in the jewel box said to go to the Walmart site and download it, so I did. It was a WMA file so I had to download and install Windows Media Player 9 on a machine here that still runs Windoze to burn the file to an audio CD. Now that Black Crowes track ("Lovin' Cup") is ready to rip to MP3, and if I had the gear, ready to record to 8-track.

      I take it you're a penguinista. Yes, you can listen to .wma files in xmms, just need the xmms-wma plugin for it, readily available for Debian, Fedora, & Ubuntu, some assembly required for Gentoo, of course...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:8-Track by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Good answer !

      And one of my decks has a fast-forward :)

      And a pause button, rewind would make a god-awful mess tho, hehe.

      I am worse than an 8-track buff, I am a QUADraphonic 8-track buff :)
      hehe, Quad recorder with a 4-channel dolby box and 2 EQs. I need to make some mix tapes one of these days.

      If I could format shift the VHS easily I would but there is nothing to format shift my QUAD tapes to nor would I ;)

    4. Re:8-Track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it requires a lot more work in gentoo because xmms was dropped. Xmms has been unmaintaned and falling behind for a long time now.

    5. Re:8-Track by Farmbubba · · Score: 1

      If you try to buy a tape nowdays, its anyware from $4-8, DVD's are two to three times more expensive. Tapes are now the discount way to buy a movie.

    6. Re:8-Track by evilviper · · Score: 1
      8-Track has a small cult following that's endeared to it because of it's impractical quirkiness.

      It was quirky, no doubt. However, the impractical features are offset by some highly practical ones... For example, even today, a cousin of the 8-track (Fidelipac) is used for samples in recording studios... There really isn't any other way (outside digital) to do endless looping playback.

      If they had reduced the physical size, and done a MUCH better job keeping the ends of the tape held together, 8-track might have kept going on strong for years, rather than becomming the butt of so many jokes.

      No fast forward, no rewind. You wanna hear your favorite song again? Wait for it to work its way around.

      Fast Forward wasn't common at first, but it appeared after a while. I can't imagine how a Rewind button could possibly work.... It's not easy to push the tape back into the CENTER of the spool from whence it came.

      And the 8-track nature made rewind superfluous. Your 40-minute album was divided into quarters you could select from, so any song was generally no more than approx. 6 minutes away.

      And you should see the box of 4-track tapes I recently discovered...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:8-Track by autophile · · Score: 1
      Ah, the sounds of obsolete technology.

      The 8-track: Ka-thunk.....ka-thunk.....ka-thunk!

      The Apple II: Beep! Chukkachukkachukkachukkachuk...scrape...scrape.

      Pong: Pip. Pip. Pip. Pip.

      The record player: Because I-I-I-I l-o-o-o-ove you-u-u-u-u! Kssssh, kk, Kssssh, kk, Kssssh, kk...

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
  12. I suspect most recent VHS use is for recording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I only recently (1 year ago) got a DVD. I got a DVD/VHS deck for occasional TV recording and a small back library. Now DVD recorders are reaching the same el-cheapo rate I paid for my dual deck. I suspect DVRs and DVD recorders are really what is driving out VHS, not pressed DVDs themselves.

  13. Yeah, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    VHS tapes are much more durable than DVDs. If you want a clear idea of the difference, try borrowing some high-traffic DVDs from the library and viewing those. VHS tapes are also handy when one needs to "tape" something to watch later.

    1. Re:Yeah, but.... by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Except that the quality of VHS tapes degrades over time, while they are just sitting there.

      Most people don't have "high-traffic" needs. Plus, even at its best, VHS quality is hardly palatable anymore.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Yeah, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you that a VHS tape would have around the same life expectancy. Ask someone who worked in a movie rental store back in the VHS days, snapped tapes, vcrs eating whole tapes, degridation, etc were commonplace, moreso than the problems they have with dvds that is for sure.

    3. Re:Yeah, but.... by peterd11 · · Score: 0

      I've never though of VHS tapes as being more durable than DVDs. There's always the chance that the VCR can "eat" the tape, and less drastic mishandling can wrinkle the tape, which is very thin. Unlike VHS tapes, DVDs can be copied with no loss at all (possibly requiring a DL DVD), so you could always keep a perfect backup if you're worried about wear. Also, even a scratched DVD can be copied if you're willing to expend some effort to remove the bad scratches.

    4. Re:Yeah, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a sample point, I recorded ST:DS9 when it first aired on TDK EHG Avilyn tapes and recently popped them in a JVC HR-S7500U. Looked fine.

    5. Re:Yeah, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"Most people don't have "high-traffic" needs."

      No, what I mean by "high-traffic" is viewing material that is high-demand at the library (heh, I'd rather not pay). Borrow a copy of the Simpsons (as a radical example) from the library. DVDs are not durable. It's not even just "kids" programs, I've borrowed "24" DVDs that were just shot -- they are pixelated and simply cease to play (half way through). The same thing has happened with movies and PBS programs. VHS tapes, because of their more mechanical nature, do not have these limitations.
            As far as quality, you are right, but I have about a 20-inch TV. It's good enough for basic viewing. At least I'm reasonably sure that if I borrow a tape from the library, it will play -- a DVD, I'm not so sure about.

  14. How long ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    How long until VHS players themselves go the way of the 8-track player?

    I'd say probably around the same time Compact Audio Cassette (CAC) disappears from existence. Speaking of, CAC is 43 years old now...

  15. Mass adoption by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    seriously hard to kill the peoples choice

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Mass adoption by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 0, Troll
      seriously hard to kill the peoples choice
      Oh come on! Someone should at least try to take care of Bush, even if it's hard no?

      Sorry I couldn't let this one go. For the humor impaired: this was a joke
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
  16. Variety Confirms It by Tackhead · · Score: 1, Troll
    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered VHS community when Variety confirmed that VHS market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all pre-recorded video sales. Coming close on the heels of a recent Variety survey which plainly states that VHS has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. VHS is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by falling dead last in the recent video rental test market.

    You don't need to be Jack Valenti to predict VHS's future. The hand writing is on the wall: VHS faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for VHS because VHS is dying. Things are looking very bad for VHS. As many of us are already aware, VHS continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood at the hand of the Boston Strangler.

    VHS is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its market share. The sudden and unpleasant departures from the market of long time videotape manufacturers BASF and TDK only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: VHS is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Videotape market leader BASF states that there are 7000 video titles released on VHS. How many users of VHS are there? Let's see. The number of VHS versus Betamax results on Google is roughly in ratio of 198 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/198 = 35 Betamax users.

    Crap. That sorta puts my parody of this little troll all to hell, doesn't it. Not that it'll stop you from reading this all the way to the end.

    But all major surveys show that VHS has steadily declined in market share. VHS is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If VHS is to survive at all it will be among obscure retro video format dabblers, like those weird motherfuckers who play around with CED (Capacitance Electronicc Disc) instead of something that could at least pretend to be sane, like Laserdisc. VHS continues to decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save VHS from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes, VHS is dead.

    Fact: VHS is dying.

    1. Re:Variety Confirms It by NoData · · Score: 0, Troll

      No troll like an old troll. Kudos.

    2. Re:Variety Confirms It by rexbinary · · Score: 0

      Has this been confirmed by Netcraft?

    3. Re:Variety Confirms It by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1

      Today's mods have no appreciation for the classics. There ought to be a handbook.

      --

      "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    4. Re:Variety Confirms It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Today's mods have no appreciation for the classics. There ought to be a handbook.

      One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Slashdot trolling community...

  17. VHS won't die until. . . by kimvette · · Score: 3, Interesting

    VHS won't die until the HTPC appliance fully matures, and a DRM-free medium is adapted en masse, and can record both NTSC and ATSC. DVD recordable is almost there, but is less flexible than an HTPC and won't record high-def, so why bother upgrading? Tivo almost has it, except tivo decides how long you can keep recordings (in some cases at least), NOT you, PLUS it requires a monthly subscription and either a land line or ethernet connection to phone home. Also, Tivo makes it FAR to difficult to record say, Smallville or Desperate Housewives or whatever it is you and your friends all want to watch, then take that recording over to a friend's house or simply lend it out. It's FAR to difficult for the average joe to record a show for you while you're on vacation and then give you the timeshifted content.

    I think that VHS will be around until the HTPC is easy to use, DRM-free, HDTV capable, AND the public is made aware of it. Myth is so close, and yet so far, because it is a royal pain in the ass to set up, and the easy-to-configure distribution (Knoppmyth) is fully two generations behind when it comes to chipset and video card support.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Insightful

      VHS won't die until the HTPC appliance fully matures, and a DRM-free medium is adapted en masse, and can record both NTSC and ATSC.

      Most purchasers these days don't care about DRM and have no idea what NTSC or ATSC are. Those who do know NTSC don't know what ATSC is.

      DVD recordable is almost there, but is less flexible than an HTPC and won't record high-def, so why bother upgrading?

      I agree that DVD*R is pretty much DOA, mainly because it was just too complicated for a lot of people though.

      Tivo almost has it, except...

      tivo decides how long you can keep recordings (in some cases at least), NOT you


      Well, it is a FIFO setup, at least for content that you select, although not all DVRs work this way. But that's usually okay, and given the choice many people would prefer dropping the oldest footage they've asked for rather than the newest. In any case, if you try to put 22 hours of content into a 20 hour space, 2 hours of it are going to be lost.

      PLUS it requires a monthly subscription and either a land line or ethernet connection to phone home.

      Well, that's for namebrand Tivo. Almost all cable companies offer DVRs. Besides, compared to the cost of cable/sattelite, most people don't care about a Tivo subscription fee if they make use of the Tivo-specific features.

      Also, Tivo makes it FAR to difficult to record say, Smallville or Desperate Housewives or whatever it is you and your friends all want to watch, then take that recording over to a friend's house or simply lend it out

      Yup. Turns out that most of your friends probably have DVRs too. Those who don't, generally don't care. Those who do care will come and visit you to watch it if its that important.

      It's FAR to difficult for the average joe to record a show for you while you're on vacation and then give you the timeshifted content.

      So what? With many providers, you can just go online and add it yourself. Besides, unlike a traditional VCR you've probably set up a Season Pass to record what you want before you leave the house in the first place.

      I think that VHS will be around until the HTPC is easy to use, DRM-free, HDTV capable, AND the public is made aware of it.

      DVRs are easy to use, HDTV capable, and the public is aware of them. And almost nobody outside of /. gives a damn about the DRM, like it or not.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by simishag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VHS is dead because it's actually pretty easy to transfer your Tivo shows off the hard drive. All you need is a VCR, and...

      Oh, wait.

    3. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by Sparohok · · Score: 1

      Among your laundry list of complaints, the only place where VHS really fills a niche that is not well served by DVD or DVR is the ability to record standard definition television in order to share it with your friends. If that were an important niche for typical consumers, DVD recorders would be at least modestly successful products. Compared with DVD players and DVR, they have utterly failed in the market. Evidence suggests that this feature isn't something people care about very much.

      Since VHS cannot record HDTV, and in fact can't even record SDTV very well, I don't understand why you would mention HDTV and ATSC. A product does not need to support HDTV in order to compete with and displace VHS.

      VHS does have rights management, it's just not digital. It's called Macrovision. A product does not need to be DRM-free in order to compete with and displace VHS.

    4. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by aaza · · Score: 1
      Most purchasers these days don't care about DRM and have no idea what NTSC or ATSC are. Those who do know NTSC don't know what ATSC is.

      Never The Same Colo(u)r.
      Always The Same Colo(u)r?

      I know, really it's Network Television Standard Comittee, but no idea what ATSC is.
      Until I googled it: Advanced Television Standard Committee.

      But you are right about "most purchasers", though.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    5. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by ben+there... · · Score: 1
      Myth is so close, and yet so far, because it is a royal pain in the ass to set up, and the easy-to-configure distribution (Knoppmyth) is fully two generations behind when it comes to chipset and video card support.

      MythTV is pretty godawful. Why is the setup like 20 pages of crap that I have no interest in changing, or even knowing about? Knoppmyth is similarly bad, and the process of installing the ivtv driver for Hauppauge cards is way too complex, extracting firmware from a Windows driver package.

      OTOH, SageTV is pretty damn simple. Install card, run driver install wizard, install SageTV, pick your local cable, done.

      As much as I'd like to like MythTV, it's pretty bad. I'll try it again sometime when I have way too much time on my hands.
    6. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Most purchasers these days don't care about DRM and have no idea what NTSC or ATSC are. Those who do know NTSC don't know what ATSC is.


      No, but they do know they want a machine that can record any show (not just the old-looking fuzzy ones, or just the new-looking pixely widescreen ones) and doesn't automatically delete things after a few of days or refuse to recording certain movies or sports events. Less articulate wording, but the idea is the same...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    7. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by tm2b · · Score: 1
      Also, Tivo makes it FAR to difficult to record say, Smallville or Desperate Housewives or whatever it is you and your friends all want to watch, then take that recording over to a friend's house or simply lend it out.
      Horseshit. TiVo makes it easier than a VCR, on units with the integrated DVD-R drive.

      I go to the transfer to DVD-R menu, select the show(s) I want, and dump it to the DVD-R - which then acts very much like the TiVo menus on a normal DVD player.

      The problem isn't the technology, it's the price of the existing product that does a great job.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    8. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And almost nobody outside of /. gives a damn about the DRM, like it or not.

      I have one word for you:

      Divx.

      Where were all your customers who didn't give a damn about DRM then?

    9. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      VHS won't die until the HTPC appliance fully matures, and a DRM-free medium is adapted en masse, and can record both NTSC and ATSC.

      Funny, my MythTV and Mediaportal boxes does just that. DRM free, Records NTSC and ATSC and from the number of users out there for both projects, they fit the definition of en masse.

      So what are you waiting for?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by muellerr1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Tivo has ever decided how long I can keep a recording. There's always the "Keep until I delete" option. Also, I have a Tivo with a built-in DVD recorder, which I bought specifically to record shows to lend to friends. It works like a charm. Sometimes I burn a DVD and rip it to watch on my handheld, but only because I don't have Microsoft or Media Center 9 to use the Tivo's built-in transfer-to-desktop-PC utility.

    11. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by kimvette · · Score: 1

      A VCR is going to ignore the broadcast flag and record off of the RF or S-video or composite output of your cable box, whereas Tivo will cheerfully refuse to record it per the broadcaster's request that your court-protected fair use rights (e.g., timeshifting) are illegally revoked. Not only that, Tivo will not record the component video outputs, so where is the advantage over VHS again, considering you can't ask a friend to record your shows and give you the tapes when you're on a trip?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:VHS won't die until. . . by Sparohok · · Score: 1

      A VCR is going to ignore the broadcast flag and record off of the RF or S-video or composite output of your cable box

      Wrong. Cable boxes already Macrovision encode the protected content on their analog outputs, so your VCR won't record them as a result. Apparently your righteous indignation doesn't arise from actual experience.

      per the broadcaster's request that your court-protected fair use rights (e.g., timeshifting) are illegally revoked

      Nobody revoked your fair use rights. They just impeded your physical ability to make a certain type of copy using a particular device. There's nothing remotely illegal about that. The fact that you have a right to make a copy does not confer an obligation upon anyone to facilitate your doing so.

  18. the real question-DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "With the cost of storage plummeting and the rise of digital distribution and on-demand services, the real question should be: "How long until physical distribution of media goes the way of the 8-track player?""

    Well DRM is the fly in that ointment.

    BTW I'm looking for a decent VCR/DVD recorder that'll copy from one to the other in the $100 range as a gift for someone. Know any good ones?

    1. Re:the real question-DRM by User+956 · · Score: 1

      BTW I'm looking for a decent VCR/DVD recorder that'll copy from one to the other in the $100 range as a gift for someone. Know any good ones?

      In other words, a used computer?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:the real question-DRM by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      In other words, a used computer?

      Your computer has a VCR deck built into it?

      I don't think even the Amiga had one of those.

    3. Re:the real question-DRM by User+956 · · Score: 1

      No doubt the person already has a VCR, if they have videotapes, no? a used computer with even a 3 or 4 year old video card will have capture capability.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    4. Re:the real question-DRM by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      And that process (if it could even be called a process) is a pain in the balls and a waste of time.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    5. Re:the real question-DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      And that process (if it could even be called a process) is a pain in the balls and a waste of time.

      And you are the measure of all men. No other opinions need apply.

      I have a friend with an enormous collection of vinyl. He's currently putting it all to a digital format, including scanning all the LP cover art and cleaning it up.

      No, it's not a one-click operation and he took some time learning all the pieces. So take your "waste of time" and shove it up your ass, along with your pussified notion of what constitutes pain. You're certainly not qualified to speak about pain as regards balls.

    6. Re:the real question-DRM by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, Mr Anonymous Coward, you're perfectly qualified to talk about ANYTHING. :)

    7. Re:the real question-DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've found the least painful way to transfer VHS to DVD is simply to buy a dual VHS/DVD recorder, they're cheap enough these days. Insert tape, insert blank disc, press 'dub' button on remote, and that's it. If there's mutiple items on the tape, just insert some chapter marks afterwards (assuming you're using RW discs).

  19. 8-tracks live! by doom · · Score: 1
    Hey, what do you guys have against 8-tracks? My 8-track player is working fine, I'm not going to dump it just for the sake of being trendy.

    Some of us still have 8-track minds.

  20. VHS will die when... by Vskye · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can get movies that are only available on VHS. Or if you have a security system based on VHS recording and you actually get around to switching everything over to DVR. Or if your VHS player dies and you can not find a replacement.

    --
    Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
    1. Re:VHS will die when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the horse and buggy isn't dead, because the Amish still use them? What a useless definition you have of a dead technology.

  21. maybe by syrinx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a whole drawer full of VHS tapes, but they all came from my wife when we got married. I was perfectly happy without a VCR.

    We still have a VCR but it doesn't really work. My plan is to take it apart and build a PVR based on a Mini-ITX motherboard inside it, so it will still act like a VCR, only, you know, without the tapes.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:maybe by fredistheking · · Score: 1

      I have been trying to get my wife to let me record her naked for years to no avail. So VHS is your secret to success?

    2. Re:maybe by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >I have been trying to get my wife to let me record her naked for years to no avail.
      I've got some tapes of her if you want..

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  22. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VH what?

  23. my VCR & Tapes stay for a while by dieth · · Score: 1

    My VCR is my tuner, my PC/PS2/Cable is routed through this box. This box stays for a while, are there any "low cost" DVD recorder/tuner devices out there?
    Some of these dvdrecorders look cool and all but, my VCR cost me $40. It has 1 SVideo input 3 RCA inputs, 2 RF cable inputs, 1 RF cable out, 1 RCA out I have no HiDef equipment sorry :P I also have tons of VHS movies, am I suppose to just throw all of these away and buy DVDs to replace them? Or what the MPAA doesn't want, use my video capture cards & convert them to DVD myself although this is a time versus boredom issue, one day it may happen.

  24. Better than my DVD recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MPEG on my DVD recorder blows big artifact laden chunks when in 3 or 4 hour recording mode. VHS is better for archiving F1 races, etc.. Except for the slow skip-ahead.

  25. It can't ever go the way of 8-track by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Maybe it is different for Americans, but it really isn't possible (from my point of view) for VHS to go the way of 8-track tapes. To my memory, in my life (and I can remember the '70s) I've seen one 8-track player and zero 8-track tapes. In terms of liveliness, even Beta is a hyperactive ferret on a sugar high* compared to 8-track.

    * This metaphor was brought to you by Sluggy Freelance. Remember - a metaphor is a simile that's grown up.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  26. This is shocking news by palindromic · · Score: 2, Funny

    To have this following so closely on the heels of last weeks "Variety declares that poop comes from butts" ? Variety truly is the son of Man.

  27. Audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    DVD will not kill VHS because the analog audio on VHS tapes is far superior to the compressed digital audio on DVD disks.

    DVD simply cannot match the quality of audio signal obtained from a tape in good condition played on a quality stereo VCR.

    Therefore VHS is not dead, nor will it be until DVD and HD-DVD formats stop compressing audio and using substandard sampling rates and bit depth.

    When a standard DVD or HD-DVD release can provide uncompressed (or lossless compressed) 24bit 96KHz audio at a minimum, then perhaps VHS will become obsolete.

    Even then, audiophiles will still prefer the quality analog signal from VHS tape. (I have seen people use VHS tape for audio only without video because of the physical layout of data on the tape can provide exceptional signal quality.)

    1. Re:Audio by budcub · · Score: 1

      There are some (not many) DVDs that have PCM digital as one of the soundtrack options, that's two-channel uncompressed. Same as what you'd get on a Compact Disc. Pink Floyd, "The Wall" is one, and a couple of other music DVDs.

    2. Re:Audio by WMD_88 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      DVD simply cannot match the quality of audio signal obtained from a tape in good condition played on a quality stereo VCR.

      Therein lies the problem: You need good tapes (and tapes will wear out, and with no new ones...), and a good VCR (many suck). On top of that, VHS HiFi stereo really isn't all that great. It's not as bad as VHS linear mono (shudder), but it's not like vinyl or anything. And there's no surround sound support (no, "Dolby 2.0 surround" doesn't count). Dolby 5.1 at 448kbps is not that bad, seriously. I don't know what everyone's problem is. In fact, I can't think of a single VHS tape I own that sounds better than a DVD. And all the tapes have horrible dynamic range, too.
      Besides, why would *audio*philes care about a video format?
    3. Re:Audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Besides, why would *audio*philes care about surround sound?
      I'm struggling to afford and set-up my room for plain old stereo!

      Actually, VHS HiFi audio is pretty good. Similar to FM radio. Much better than the much-vaunted MP3. Better than most (non-CD) consumer grade DACs.

      And I can;t pre-program my NAk to record the Boston Phil Live Concert (or Darkwings) while I'm out/sleeping.

    4. Re:Audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the OP here.

      VHS Hi-Fi is really quite good. There are people who prize their $multi-thousand linear cassette decks, which themselves are less capable and more prone to playback errors than a good VCR that's a fraction of the price. Just make sure that you use the same VCR for playback and recording, and that you use "dense" tape. S-VHS tapes work very well, but anything from TDK or Maxell that's graded "Hi-Fi" or better (sometimes just "E-HG" too) really works fine. Then make sure you've disabled the linear track playback, and you're gold.

      For music, I couldn't seriously imagine preferring 6 digital channels running through 448 Kbps AC3.

      As for the term "video format" - it doesn't make a lick of difference to me whether VHS is pigeon-holed as a "video format" by those who would ignore its other strengths. I have several music albums archived in the format going back at least a decade, and I love the way they sound to this day (on the same perfectly functional equipment, it should be noted).

      As for VHS today - I have several S-VHS decks that I would never trade in for DVRs. Not by a longshot. Analog is the convenience and value leader for medium-res, high-speed video without DRM.

    5. Re:Audio by shadow169 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried the DTS sound track on a DVD? The compression is far less that the Dolby Digital track. Yes I know not all DVD's have DTS, but it's a lot better now than it was 5 years ago. If more people like you (and I) who demand superior sound quality speak with our wallets by buying DVD's with DTS, then perhaps that number will go up.

      Plus I'll take any small loss in sound quality between (very rare, only played once etc) superior quality VHS tapes and DTS in exchange for the 6+ discrete channels of audio I can get from a DVD with DTS. (Yes I know Dolby Digital provides the same channels, but it's that damn compression)

    6. Re:Audio by minuszero · · Score: 1

      What?

      Uh. I beg to differ.

      See people saying how much better casette tapesare than CDs?
      No.
      it's 'cos they aren't.

      Just because something is analogue, doesn't automatically make it better than compressed digital.

      Last time i checked, all my old video casettes were degrading terribly...
      and from what i recall, they were never that great to begin with.

  28. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1
    I'll start listening to Variety about contemporary trends as soon as they drop that inane, out-dated hipster lingo that they use instead of the English language.

    While I would normally agree with you, the linked article is surprisingly free of any such lingo and uses relatively normal English. In short, RTFA :)

  29. Great source of a slashdot article by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are we paying credence to the likes of Variety on a geek site? And frankly, who cares what they think?

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Great source of a slashdot article by JKConsult · · Score: 1

      Um, what? Variety is the one of the (I'll hold of on saying "the", even though I believe it to be so) bibles of the movie industry. You know, those people who were the primary drivers of the VHS market. So I think they'd have a little bit to say about the matter.

    2. Re:Great source of a slashdot article by SuperSnooper · · Score: 1

      >Why are we paying credence to the likes of Variety on a geek site? And frankly, who cares what they think?

      Instead of invoking Ad Hominem, why not criticise what you don't like about the article itself?

    3. Re:Great source of a slashdot article by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Um, what? They may be part of the popular adoption of the format in Joe Sixpacks home but they certainly have nothing to do with the technology behind it.

      So I think they'd have a little bit to say about the matter.

      Really? This is like saying that Spin magazine has an inside track (or even a reputable take on) the future of optical media because they review CDs.

      Let's face facts: OK so Variety is a big hollywood magazine and movies made VCRs a big attraction. Does that mean the technology dies just because of a blurb they wrote says so? How about you look at where the technology really lives and breathes... the market place. Tons of people still make and sell VCRs. A half-assed article in Variety isn't going to change that fact.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:Great source of a slashdot article by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Instead of invoking Ad Hominem, why not criticise what you don't like about the article itself?
      Although I agree with your point, surely it's incorrect to use the term "ad hominem" about anything other than an actual human being?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Great source of a slashdot article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always assumed Variety was written by humans. Who do you think writes it?

  30. DivX is dead too? by randomblast · · Score: 1

    VHS is survived by a child, DVD, and by Tivo, VOD and DirecTV. It was preceded in death by Betamax, Divx, mini-discs and laserdiscs.

    Seems pretty lively on the P2P networks...

    --
    ...these aren't my real teeth.
    1. Re:DivX is dead too? by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

      They were referring to the short lived DivX Disc format, which was like a rental in that you paid a few bucks for the disc, but your player would connect to the internet and only allow you to watch it for a specified period of time.

    2. Re:DivX is dead too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot SelectaVison.

    3. Re:DivX is dead too? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Seems pretty lively on the P2P networks...
      Wrong DivX. Before the format you're thinking of there were 'special' DVDs called DivX that you rented but never took back as they died about 2-3 days after opening the packet.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  31. VHS wont die yet by Susceptor · · Score: 1

    it wont die for one simple reason. When i leave my house and I want to record a TV show, I pop in a VHS tape. Why? because like most people out there I dont have a DVR or a DVD recorder capable of recording broadcast TV. So the job falls to my trusty old tape, thats been taped over 500 times but still manages the job magnificently. The day I can buy a DVD disk that I can use and re-use to tape bradcast TV on a $40 DVD player, the VHS will die. But that day has not come yet.

    --
    Fool me once...shame on you, fool me twice...won't be fooled again (our president)
    1. Re:VHS wont die yet by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      Interesting assertion given that I'm doing precisely that with my DVD recorder and DVD players.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    2. Re:VHS wont die yet by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      a $40 DVD recorder?

    3. Re:VHS wont die yet by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      My apology, I thought you meant the DVD player was $40. That will teach me to read more closely.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  32. 8-track? try cassette tape by floatingtrem · · Score: 1

    while vhs is certainly on the decline, many families still have a huge catalog of vhs tapes, and many movies are still not yet available on dvd. no vhs is not the format of choice, it is still reasonably usable, and it offers great ease (not to mention price) when it comes to recording options (kinda like cassette tapes maybe?) sure, someday they will be pretty much out of use, but even now, i know alot of households that have cassette players in their home stereos, my own included. heck one of my friends still makes mix tapes on a regular basis. not until the dvr is commonplace will i see vhs as completely dead. (how else is ma supposed to tape her soaps?)

  33. The real answer by NineNine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'll happen when broadband becomes as ubiquitous and as reliable as electricity. We have a loooong way to go before that happens.

    1. Re:The real answer by billcopc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We ? Not quite. Our Governments have a long way to go before they wake up and lay down the adequate infrastructure to support nationwide broadband. They're still of the attitude that high-speed internet access is a luxury, that it's for geeks and gamers. Will someone smack them in the face and demonstrate that we can do a helluva lot more online, and could do even better if there were enough pipe to push content through. VOIP, IPTV, day-to-day business.. Hell I'd rather pay my bills online than physically walk down to an ATM, with the inevitable scum walking by, checking out how much cash I'm carrying, judging the risk vs benefit of trying to jump me. Or maybe I have a beef with the act of renting videos, only to pop them into a computer for playback, then returning them to the physical store... when it would have been faster and easier to just download it off the net, and that's with my current 5meg line - imagine 100meg like some european countries offer...

      People are quick to shoot it down because they think more bandwidth will mean more piracy. I do consider piracy to be a direct competitor to traditional business, simply because the pirated material is usually more convenient and certainly cost-effective, because they take advantage of the latest technology advancements. We've had DivX for what, 6-7 years now ? Why doesn't Blockbuster or Jumbo Video offer video streaming ? Why do I have to spend an hour driving to the store, hunting down a box that's in no particular order and is probably already out, just to see a stupid movie ? Most cable companies now offer "digital cable", including video-on-demand... pay-per-view done better, and they're immensely successful. They'd be even better if they charged reasonable prices instead of the $6.99 average for movies (and godawful prices for porn - have they never heard of the internet?). Still at that price point, the convenience of not having to leave home and not having the risk of all copies being out, there is great value in there!

      Now we need more businesses and services could learn to adapt to online-ness and harness it's potential. Some places offer telework over the net, which is fantastic when applicable. Why waste limited real estate just for a chair, desk and phone when we all have that at home ? I'd be happy to give up my physical work place, save the travel and lunch money and use it to rent a bigger residence, or maybe upgrade my office equipment to help me work more comfortably, efficiently. The costs saved to the employer could to to create more jobs, or offer better price competition, more value to the shareholders and the customers. So why the hell are we not doing this already ? Government barriers, financial barriers, tax barriers, and old-mentality brick walls.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:The real answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell I'd rather pay my bills online...


      The 1990s called. It said you've been able to do this for a long time. You can even pay bills "online" that end up in them sending a check (with no fee), but that's very rare. I write one or two checks a year, for paying individuals.
    3. Re:The real answer by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can get faster electricity? Why didnt anyone tell me?

    4. Re:The real answer by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      I even pay individuals online when physically meeting up with them isn't convenient (such as my grandmother who is a 5 hour drive from here). My bank (Bank of America) will mail a check from my account to where ever I tell them to for no charge. It takes about 2 minutes to set up a new payee, and additional payments to an existing payee can be done in literally less than 20 seconds.

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    5. Re:The real answer by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
      It'll happen when broadband becomes as ubiquitous and as reliable as electricity. We have a loooong way to go before that happens.

      North Korea doesn't have much broadband, and they have terribly unreliable electricity. I'm sure there's a number of villages in Africa that have neither.

      May I toss my VHS tapes now?

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    6. Re:The real answer by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      This could be fixed with Internet over Power. Then broadband will be exactly as ubiquitous and reliable as electricity. It actually doesn't really take as much to implement; the infrastructure is already there.

      --
      Zing!
    7. Re:The real answer by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      actually, north korea has virtually no internet access at all, except for a very few buildings.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    8. Re:The real answer by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      Why do I have to spend an hour driving to the store, hunting down a box that's in no particular order and is probably already out, just to see a stupid movie ?

      You live an -hour- from a Blockbuster and you have internet fast enough to download DVD quality videos with ease?

    9. Re:The real answer by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      just because the lines themselves are fairly robust, you're forgetting many things

      1) rolling blackouts in places like california- there's no guarantee that people's internet would stay connected
      2) traffic accidents involving power poles- it's much more common than you'd think and they're happy to shut down a wider area to ensure the safety of the emergency and repair crews.
      3) even if the connection physically stays up (1 & 2) - BPL uses frequencies that happen travel a very long distance which a) interferes with other communications and b) allows other communications to interfere. Your internet could be slowed down or disrupted by someone a world away (unlikely, but possible)
      4) with any transmitted service, there's the potential for blowing out the transmitter - lightning, powerline shorts, whatever
      5) the only way to get through the transformers is to put repeaters on either side of the transformer- that's a lot of possible points of failure and the infrastructure for that is not already there.

      there's more, but I think I've listed enough.

    10. Re:The real answer by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Forgot one important one myself- power goes out due to weather in a lot of places:

      tornadoes, ice storms, snow, wind, etc

      telephone lines, while on the same poles, stay up in much more diverse conditions and isn't a safety hazard so it isn't ever shut down to protect crews or people.

    11. Re:The real answer by aonifer · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the last year my broadband has been more reliable than my electricity.

      No, I'm not kidding.

    12. Re:The real answer by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      I too have used bank of america's online bill pay and found it to be quite useful when sending checks to friends and family. Kudos to them and the people who pointed me in their direction!

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    13. Re:The real answer by indigoid · · Score: 1

      that's fscking ridiculous. Why would you mail a cheque/check when you can just deposit directly into their account? Utterly unnecessary lag. I have been using electronic direct deposits like this for ebay (and various other) payments for years, and it works very well indeed. I also use it to pay rent automatically, since my bank lets me setup repeating scheduled transfers.

      FFS, at that stage you're already communicating with the bank systems electronically. why add an utterly unnecessary paper step? If you don't know the account number it makes a bit of sense, but in what other situation?

      I had heard from friends who'd moved to the USA from Australia that it was a step backwards in financial systems, but I'd not realised just how big the backward step was.

      I could count the number of cheques I have ever used on one hand. All of them were bank-issued cheques rather than personal cheques, and they were all for large purchases, like cars, Playboy playmates, 1000-room mansions and similar. (OK, just cars :/)

      --
      P-plate adventurer
    14. Re:The real answer by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      While there are many pros and cons to BPL. I don't think points 1 and 2 really have much effect for most people. If my power goes out my computer is down anyway. I suppose you could have a laptop but thats only gonna give you another 3 hours assuming of course that you are using dial up or your laptop has a DSL modem built in. Because if you are depending on cable or a wireless router then thats going out along with your power.

    15. Re:The real answer by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      If you don't know the account number it makes a bit of sense, but in what other situation?

      Except not knowing the payee's account number is the norm, not the exception, and by a wide margin. I don't know the account numbers of anyone in my family except my father, and the only reason I have my father's is because he lives in Japan, so the added step of mailing a physical check is actually significant. Plus, it's much easier to keep track of someone's address than it is to keep track of their account number, because address changes are usually actually announced to the world, while bank account changes are often a private matter. Add to that the fact that many people have several bank accounts and where exactly they want my payment to get this month may or may not be the same as last month, and it's just not worth the hassle. I'll send a check, they can do with it whatever they want.

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    16. Re:The real answer by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "They're still of the attitude that high-speed internet access is a luxury..."

      You know...I'd say for the majority of people out there that don't have it...it probably is an 'un-necessary' luxury. I'd venture to guess that the majority of people that want (and are not on the poverty level) broadband...have it.

      A large portion of people in the US are in the young to old Grandpa/Grandma age...or just not into tech at all. A lot of others out there that enjoy it...have it at work, and I know some actual tech people during the day, that really could care less about touching a computer when they leave work....so, it is a waste for them too.

      I don't understand the mindset either, mind you...I go through withdrawals when my connection goes down for even a little while, but, there are a LOT of people out there that could care less about the internet and a high-speed connection. Aside from those in really rural places....pretty much anyone that wants broadband, can get it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:The real answer by indigoid · · Score: 1

      I would say that it's the exception because you (collectively, not you the individual) haven't really tried to make electronic transfers the rule. Adoption drives adoption, I suppose.

      If I need to give someone some funds I tend to ask for an account number as a first option, and I know from experience with people from many walks of life (ebay, family, friends, colleagues, shops, etc) that I'm not the exception to the rule.

      I don't know anyone of my generation (I'm 27 now) that uses a chequebook, and a lot of the older people are getting rid of theirs as well --- that primitive, time-wasting crap just isn't necessary anymore.

      --
      P-plate adventurer
    18. Re:The real answer by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I mostly meant for using VOIP- which is a critical point if you want to dial 911 when the power goes out.

    19. Re:The real answer by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      doh- left off half my response with the back button for some reason..

      I (as I hope others do) have a UPS on my router/cable modem so that hopefully my internet still works for phone when the power goes out. I do have a cell phone, but if I can use the IP phone, I do and it dials my local 911.

    20. Re:The real answer by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 1

      Why do you need internet when you have no power to use the Desktop?

      I know, I know, Generators, APCs, Laptops, etc. But when power goes out on my road, the Amplifier for the Cable company at the end of the road loses power too, and I lose internet. How is this much different?

      --
      Zing!
    21. Re:The real answer by jibjibjib · · Score: 1
      Come on, dude, we've had EoIP for ages...

      www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3251.html

    22. Re:The real answer by jibjibjib · · Score: 1
      My broadband provider (in Australia, our broadband sucks, we are years behind in terms of internet access) resets the connection every 24 hours for "billing reasons" (read: so I don't end up getting a business-grade connection and static IP for $30/month)

      Now that is unreliability.

    23. Re:The real answer by AppComp · · Score: 1

      Here in India, broadband is a whole lot more reliable than power. On line distribution gives media companies the opportunity to retail their entire collection in the smallest of towns. With the largest movie industry in the world, a lot of media companies in India are venturing into untraditional distribution models.

    24. Re:The real answer by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      You missed my post about a UPS for internet to keep the phones working....

      but your post was exactly my point in the first place- if power goes out for BPL customers, so does internet- even if you do have a UPS- so if you're relying on VOIP over BPL, you're really SOL. At least with cable internet, you have a chance at things still working.. but even then, nothing beats an analog phone line.

      The original poster I replied to suggested that BPL would fix everything and because of its reliability, would be a great way to have rock solid internet, voip, etc.

      As stable as power is in some areas, it can't hold a candle to analog telephone- and another original point of mine was that regardless of AC stability- the internet portion relies on a separate set of variables that intersect partially with the powerline stability. BPL requires repeaters at transformers, etc etc- which, probably will lose power in a power outage too, just like the head-end for your cable internet (though ours seems to keep on trucking in power outages- perhaps its on a different grid?).. Anyway, bottom line, BPL won't provide a stable enough infrastructure to ditch analog telephone, especially considering that power lines are shut off routinely for rolling blackouts, maintenance, accidents, etc.

      When Fiber comes to my house and has all of the regulations of analog telephone- and my voip provider has an asterisk server at the other end of that line with hard lines directly connected to that, I'll think about getting rid of my cell phone and relying completely on VOIP.

    25. Re:The real answer by Der+PC · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I have had two power outages in the past year. I have also had two network outages in the past year ( unrelated to the power outages ). Gee... Oh and for the record, it is now almost a year since the distributors in Iceland ( polar bear jokes not needed, they don't live here ) quit distributing VHS tapes. We can still buy blank tapes, and there is still content available in the stores but people aren't buying it.. Rentals have been getting rid of their old tapes ( selling them for $1-4 ). So even if it's really not actual for the US, it's actually happening up here. Unfortunately.

      --
      This signature is DRM protected. By the DMCA, you are not allowed to counteract or oppose to it.
    26. Re:The real answer by k33l0r · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I concur. I don't live in the States but it seems that you're ten years behind Europe (or at least Finland) in financial transactions. In Finland pretty much all bills are paid electronically. Whenever you get a bill from someone it will include an account number (and more often than not, an account number to several different banks) and a reference code so that the company knows what the money is for.

      And most people will transfer money (if necessary) to their friends and family electronically. In fact pretty much everybody uses an online banking service. And our banking services are extremely secure. They are protected doubly as you will have one password and user name that do not change and another set that are used only once. The bank will send you a card with the disposable passwords as you near the end of the list. This way it less serious if a thief gains access to your permanent authentication or to the disposable one as one cannot be used without the other. At least this is how my bank works.

    27. Re:The real answer by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I still use a checkbook, for certain transactions. Very simple reason: a cancelled check is great evidence that the payment was made. It assures against any screwups (like my bank posting the payment but not actually delivering funds), and demonstrates that I fulfilled my obligations, I.E. if funds aren't there, then payee's bank was probably responsible.

      Paper statements can work too, maybe; however, for privacy reasons, I wouldn't ever want to show a payee a copy of a bank statement. When you get the cancelled check, you have a separate document for each transaction: you can show the proof without revealing the nature of other payments you have made during that period.

      If the other party, I.E. the lender comes back a few years later and claim they never received that payment for an installment that was due on such and such date, I can pull the cancelled check out of the file, and show them the cancelled check for that payment.

      That's quickly accessible proof that I paid the bill. On the other hand, if I had made the payment electronically, I may not have something to prove so soundly that a payment was made at all. Then where am I if my bank didn't keep the records long enough, closed down (and I switched banks), some of their older records got messed up, or they no longer have enough information retained about the transfer, to satisfy the payee?

    28. Re:The real answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Largest movie industry maybe... but I still can't digest having a song and dance number in the middle of a war movie...

    29. Re:The real answer by name*censored* · · Score: 1

      Wow the USA still uses cheques? I don't know a single person with a chequebook, nor do I know anyone who even knows how to write a cheque. Hell, I work in a store, and I can count the number of people who've paid with cheques on one hand. Don't you need the account number/details to write the cheque to begin with? Why not electronically transfer the funds; even if your bank doesn't support it, there are dozens of other options (Moneygram, PayPal, Western Union etc etc). It's faster and safer than mailing a cheque, and I'm sure people appreciate not having to drive down to the bank and wait in line to cash the cheque (hey, isn't there something about how VHS was inferior because there was no possible way to transfer them apart from physically in an earlier thread?)

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    30. Re:The real answer by NineNine · · Score: 1

      What's the point of having broadband without power? Seems kind of silly.

  34. u=matic anyone? by Subgenius · · Score: 1

    Lets face it, as a commercial medium, sure, VHS is dead. So is Quad, MII, 1" C, and u-matic, but that doesn't mean you can't
    find equipment to use the format (well, MII and 2" Quad is kind of hard to find). I don't mind if everyone writes of VHS, just
    means more end-of-life tape bargains for me.

    Before 1" was dead, a reel of 66minute V1-K tape from Sony was $125. I picked up a sealed CASE of these
    for $20+shipping on ebay.

    Bring on VHS's death (and the bargains that will follow)

    --
    Toil is Stupid. Don't be Stupid.
  35. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The section is called "Home Ent," they mention "vidgame" consoles, and there are 2 instances of "biz." I'd call it normal Englzh.

  36. Netcraft by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Has Netcraft confirmed it?

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  37. Re:VHS can never die, at least until... by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't you think that you should wait more than 20 minutes before stealing other people's posts (not mine, but one I replied to) for Karma?

    Reference : http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=207016&cid=168 78422 @ 6:25pm

    And shame on you.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  38. No problem! by mogrify · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's okay, Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are dead too. Oh, and WoW is lame.

    C'mon, kids!!! What'll die next? The Zune? The PS3? The PS2? The PS1? The PS4? The Dreamcast? CompactFlash? The mouse? Vista? Slackware? XP? Caldera? Slashdot? Digg? MSDN? Web 2.0? Web 1.0? Internet2? Token Ring? IPv6? Episodic gaming? Non-episodic gaming? In-game ads? The PowerPC? Cell? Core duo? Core trio? Earth? Caprica? The Death Star? SCO? Novell? Red Hat? Sony? IE? Firefox? IceWeasel? The Pirate Bay? Mmmm. Okay, I'm bored. Continue below if you wish.

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    1. Re:No problem! by basotl · · Score: 1

      And to think I have no mod points at the moment to mod you up. That really deserves a +5 funny. Or I might just be easily amused.

      --
      HTC EVO 4G LTE w/ CM 10.2 | NookColor w/ CM 10.2 | Samsung Epic 4G w/ CM 10.1
    2. Re:No problem! by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Yes, maybe, yes, yes, maybe, already dead, yes, probably not, yes, no, not yet, already dead, no, maybe, maybe, no, no, no, yes, no, no, no, no, probably, no, no, no, eventually, already did, already did, already did, already did, no, if they don't turn around, eventually, no, maybe, probably not.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    3. Re:No problem! by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      You'll find all the information you ever needed about PS4's death right here, on the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

    4. Re:No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEC/Compaq/HP's VMS operating system.

  39. VHS to 8 Track - Bad Analogy by ThumperByTrade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comparing VHS and cassettes is a much better analysis. 8 track was never a popular medium for home recording like cassettes and VHS. Even today, a substantial portion of portable radios still come with cassette players. I say that VCRs will last until all forms of physical media are made extinct by on demand services.

  40. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is VHS?

  41. but... by hurfy · · Score: 1

    All my porn is on VHS you insensitive clod....

    Just kidding, almost half is on DVD now tho not neccessarily the best half ;)

    1. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most of MY porn is on hard disk now (in avi or mpg files). When you figure out how many VHS tapes is takes to equal a 500 Gb hard disk (and how much harder it is to hide that many from the wife and kids), it's easy to see why VHS is dying.

      On the other hand (no pun intended), a single hard disk crash could pretty much put me out of business, porn-wise. I wonder how I'll convince my wife that I really need a home NAS RAID storage network.

  42. I'm not dead yet by mblase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How long until VHS players themselves go the way of the 8-track player?

    Until I can buy a DVD-RW recorder or a hard drive recorder for my TV that's under $50. Until then, I'll keep using my VCR to record my favorite shows every week.

    1. Re:I'm not dead yet by williepete25 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention monthly fees for TiVo and the like. I've been using the same set of video tapes to record the 2 shows I record every week for the past 3 years. Either television programming needs to get a lot better, or TiVo, DVD-RW, etc. needs to get a lot cheaper. The VHS solution is working just fine for me. willie

    2. Re:I'm not dead yet by planetmn · · Score: 1

      You must be buying different tapes than me then. My VHS tapes tended to get really crappy after just a few recordings. With all the times I would forget to record a program, or forget to load the tape, the VCR basically sat unused under my TV for the past three years.

      Then I found a great deal on a Tivo (80-hour unit and a year of service for $125). It's great, easy enough for my wife to use and not ask directions, and it records the shows every time they are on.

      I've definately come around and become a Tivo fan.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    3. Re:I'm not dead yet by A3gis · · Score: 1

      We're dumping our last VCR soon.. DVD recorder all the way - our daughter cant post crayons into a DVD drive.

    4. Re:I'm not dead yet by LividBlivet · · Score: 1

      Like I do.
      A half dozen SVHS tapes, 150 VHS tapes and two prosumer VCR's have served me well for 20 years.
      The good stuff I copy to DVD. The random stuff fills my 5 400GB hard drives.
      I used to copy my vinyl to reel to reel tapes to save wear. Now they are mp3's.
      Now I copy my S/VHS stuff to Divx on DVD or hard drive. But the vinyl/tapes are still there for when
      the modern media shits the bed.

    5. Re:I'm not dead yet by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Once I put a floppy disk on the tray of a CDROM drive, and closed it, and when I opened it the disk was gone.

    6. Re:I'm not dead yet by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Until I can buy a DVD-RW recorder or a hard drive recorder for my TV that's under $50.

      Right, because 8-tracks were going strong until cassettes were cheaper 100% of the time...

      Besides, they'll all probably get down very close to $50 in about a month, when the Christmas sales hit hard... (Last year I got a $10 digital camera)

      Until then, I'll keep using my VCR to record my favorite shows every week.

      I think you're answering a question that is very different from the one that was asked.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:I'm not dead yet by williepete25 · · Score: 1

      My desire to be cheap has forced my standards to be extremely low.

      willie

  43. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't mention BSD you insensitive clod!

  44. The one thing I'll miss about VHS... by meme_police · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is that I NEVER had a bad rental tape. More than half the DVDs I've rented have had problems of varying impact. If VHS is dying please bring on convenient downloads because I don't think I'll ever rent a DVD again.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

    1. Re:The one thing I'll miss about VHS... by tryptych · · Score: 1

      I think that's possibly a misconception. I have had plenty of dodgy rental tapes in my time (usually a bit grunged up at the beginning). The point is, with a tape, it jiggles and drops for a second or two and then it's fine. You get so much as a speck of dirt on a DVD in the wrong place and the entire disc is unplayable. DVD's simply dont tolerate couch potatoes slamming them in when their fingers are covered in chip fat.

      --
      "I like to skate on the other side of the ice"
    2. Re:The one thing I'll miss about VHS... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      ...is that I NEVER had a bad rental tape. More than half the DVDs I've rented have had problems of varying impact.

      Whaaa??? Either you live in some magical fairy land that doesn't resemble our planet at all, or you've got some serious rose-colored glasses...

      VHS tapes are ALWAYS damaged. A few times through various VCRs and you've got stretched tape which has tracking issues, desaturated colors, blurry or damaged picture, stretched or otherwise distored audio, etc.

      With VHS tapes, you were happy if you were lucky enough to select a tape that was only seriously damaged at the beginning and end, and ignored the distortion and other issues throughout the video.

      With DVDs, people aren't happy unless they're absolutely bit-perfect and 100% glitch-free. You occasionally have to wash dust and greasy fingerprints off slightly older discs (which is unlike VHS) but that trade-off is well worth it. ...but what do I know, I only rent 100 DVDs a year...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:The one thing I'll miss about VHS... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      I NEVER had a bad rental tape.

      REALLY? I've been fooled by some cheap videos that were recorded in
      4 or 6 hour mode (to save tape?). Only the 2hr mode will interchange 100% between machines.
      If you try to interchange in 4 or 6hr mode between machines, especially different makes the
      picture usually rolls or tears (looks like crap anyway).

    4. Re:The one thing I'll miss about VHS... by zCyl · · Score: 1
      With DVDs, people aren't happy unless they're absolutely bit-perfect and 100% glitch-free.

      Uh, yeah, no kidding. If VHS has a glitch, then you're talking about a little static on a frame or two, or maybe even for a second of playback. When DVDs get glitches, playback just stops. Most of the time the glitches are scratches or some other sort of problem that can't be cleaned off, and the only way to bypass them is to use the chapter menu to attempt to go past the glitch and rewind as far as you can without making playback stop again. This makes glitches on DVDs far more painful than on VHS.
    5. Re:The one thing I'll miss about VHS... by meme_police · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about quality. I'd rather watch a poor quality tape all the way through than watch an excellent quality DVD that stops half way through. At best I can skip to the next scene on a bad DVD, at worst it's unplayable. I've definitely had technical difficulties with tape (usually with homegrown tapes, never with a rental) but I've always been able to watch the complete tape. There are too many ways a DVD can get abused when it's not in it's case.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

  45. Cheap DVD Recorders by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Well now that you can pick up a DVD Recorder (for your living room, not PC) for about $100, there's no point in investing any more in VHS. I recently got a Panasonic recorder that does +/-, DL and DVD-RAM for $199. With DVD-RAM you can even do Tivo-like things like pause live TV and rewind even while it is still recording. You can also go back and set chapter points at the commercial breaks and then delete the commercial chapters.

  46. Fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strangling doesn't cause much blood flow.

  47. Still Easiest Recording Method by commisaro · · Score: 1

    VHS players are still the easiest way to record TV for those who don't own TiVo's (and even in some cases for those who do!) so until digital recording devices become cheaper/more functional (read: less tied up by legislation restricting FFwed) I think VHS will stick around.

  48. Variety is a bunch of idiots by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    They might be right in this case, but come on... Variety is the same publication that thinks Jack Valenti is a cyborg.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  49. Tape Decks & Turntables Are Still Around by bedouin · · Score: 1

    You can still walk into a brick and mortar electronics store and purchase a tape deck or a turntable, because there's just so much media out there for both that were either home made or never reproduced on CD. The same thing is true of VHS video tapes so I suspect decks will linger on for at least another 10 years.

    However, in the audio field there's a few perks to analog. You have DJs who want vinyl, collectors who love vinyl as a format, and folks who believe analog tape (usually in the form of reel to reel tape) provides a superior sound. So there's some legitimate reasons to hold onto analog audio, perhaps if for no other reason to take advantage of the analog hole. VHS has no real redeeming qualities. No one is going to argue that VHS has crisper video or 'warmer' video than a digital format: it just sucks. The only use I can see for it is some kind of easy way around upcoming DRM schemes, but even then there's superior ways (recording to digital tape, or some other format for example).

    1. Re:Tape Decks & Turntables Are Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I find that there are often digitization artifacts present that can make digital media ( whether dvd or DirecTV sattelite feeds) quite painful to watch. This is especially true when the media is degraded and error correction kicks in. Analog video may lose color quality or get "softly" noisey, but ( unless sync drops out) does not get jarrringly painful to watch.

      This appears to be a very individual-dependent phenomenon however; some people don't even seem to notice the effect, others find (some) digital images difficult to watch. The problem can also depend on the content. Take a close look at the appearance of the "grass" on a football field as seen over digital sattelite, for example - it looks to me more like a stylized painting than a videophotographic representation. Analog recordings do not seem to show this sort of perceptual defect.

  50. Whatever happened to... by AngelWind · · Score: 1

    ...Digital VHS, JVC's hail to the savior of VHS with the ability to record (at least for now) OTA HDTV? I've seen the recorders at Best Buy (I'm sure they've all gone away by now) but it just never seem to catch on. Maybe it was too early to introduce them, since it was brought out before the days of Blu-Ray and HD-DVD with their expensive players. As I remember, it cost $500 and the tapes were $20 each, which was a bit ridiculous for a tape player. I wonder if they could re-release it now for cheaper.

  51. Hoooraaay!!! by zr-rifle · · Score: 1

    Betamax has WON!!!

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
    1. Re:Hoooraaay!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, even Doctor Who uses Beta! It's gotta be popular!

  52. Cueing is easier on VHS by Convector · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found VHS superior to DVD when I wanted to show video clips in a class I taught. I can cue up a VHS tape to the exact spot I want, pop it out of my player, pop it into the classroom VCR and it's all set to go. No fiddling around with chapter selections or anything, I just hit Play. I also use a VCR to tape "Good Eats", and the occasional other program, since I don't have Tivo and (for complicated reasons) the DVR is not hooked up to the satellite receiver. Of course, no one will argue that VHS picture or sound quality is superior to DVD. Certainly I never buy movies on VHS. I got me a VCR/DVR combo, so I can copy my VHS collection of anime fansubs onto DVD, but so far I've been unimpressed with the quality of the copies.

    1. Re:Cueing is easier on VHS by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      But if there were two spots you wanted to seek to, DVD wins.

      --
      I come here for the love
  53. What about Tammy and the T-Rex? by ari_j · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, Tammy and the T-Rex, starring Denise Richards, is not available on DVD or Betamax. How am I supposed to watch it now?

    1. Re:What about Tammy and the T-Rex? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to watch it screaming in agony, wishing your eyes were ripped out...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:What about Tammy and the T-Rex? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      You know the sad thing? It's only the fourth worst movie I've ever seen:
      1. Dancer in the Dark is so bad that I can't sit through Chicago due to flashbacks.
      2. Glitter, because any good 5-digit slashdotter has had a woman or two in his life, and at least one regret among them.
      3. Unknown. I remembered what it was 3 days ago and repressed it again.
      4. Tammy and the T-Rex, one of the earliest movies I've seen with the worst Bond girl. I have actually seen the utterly gorgeous Denise Richards in at least 4 or 5 movies, and am still looking forward to a chance to see her act.
      5. Ma Vie En Rose.

  54. Still use them. by antdude · · Score: 1

    A lot of friends and family members still use VCR mainly for recording like TV shows because cheap, no DRM, and no friggin subscriptions. Movies are on DVDs. I was going to buy a DVR/PVR a few years ago, but they were still too expensive even without subscriptions. If my VCR (not that old) ever dies, I will probably just get a DVD recorder or something. I only need a recorder. I don't need a TV guide, helper, etc.

    I do have a computer with a HDTV tuner PCI card ($40) that works in both in Linux and Windows. Great card and DVB Viewer is OK, but usable. I use it to record HDTV stuff. VCR is my backup in case my computer does something stupid, user error, or I have another TV show to record during the same hours.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Still use them. by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      Its been 5 years since i bought my Sony VCR.

      Its' been 8 months since i bought my Samsung DVD recorder.

      My Sony VCR still plays my Star Trek tapes and records from Dish TV beautifully WITHOUT any setting changes...My DVD recorder on the other hand needs to be "rebooted" for some stupid reason after every recording, and also needs a mass of setting changes to make it record in 2 hours, 6 hours or 8 hours...

      I still find my VCR convenience much better than DVD, since i can play my Tape from where i left off EVEN after ejecting the same. My DVD requires me to watch all the stupid commercials, DRM crap, etc., which i can FFW easily on my tape.

         

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Still use them. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Wow, that stinks. Man, maybe I will just buy another friggin VCR again!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  55. Cassettes/VHS not dead for many by mrraven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A Nakamichi, Tandberg, or Revox tape deck IMO sounds better than any CD. There is still an active subculture maintaining these cassette decks because they sound so good and they are so simple and reliable to record with. See for example:

    http://naks.com/

    I imagine the use of video and cassette tapes is still very active outside the U.S., Europe, and Japan.

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
    1. Re:Cassettes/VHS not dead for many by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Your comment reminds me of the motherboard I saw, with integrated audio on the motherboard, with a VACUUM TUBE for an amplifier. "Because it sounds better".

    2. Re:Cassettes/VHS not dead for many by SydBarrett · · Score: 1

      I only watch movies on laserdisc because they look warmer that way.

  56. Re:VHS can never die, at least until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    TrisexualPuppy has made a habit of stealing other people's posts and posting them as his/her/its own. On at least one occasion, they have taken multiple posts made by other people and tried to combine them in an effort to produce "originality".

    Given their disrespect for other people's intellectual property, I suspect they're some sort of RIAA official.

  57. Dead? Someone tell Sony... by svunt · · Score: 1

    ...who still send every promo movie out in VHS, to make ripping/uploading less attractive to the holder. VHS is the format you get when you ring an ad agency, and ask for a copy of a commercial. It's the format of choice for a lot of people who need to be able to quickly, cheaply copy some footage. Sweeping, bold predictions about consumer electronics from people *with* a clue are worthless, so why is anyone listening to Variety?

  58. Not FIFO- flagged by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Tivo content has the ability to be limited beyond your desires.

    if I snagged something on vhs five years ago, I still have it.. tivo can set it so you lose something X hours after recording it.. even if you mark it as save until deleted.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  59. I think VHS will last at least as long by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    As Variety.... Or haven't they heard that print media is also on the decline.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  60. Bummer by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    And I just finished my home-grown VCR powered by my Commadore-64.

  61. S o l o n g by yusing · · Score: 1

    I just finished throwing the last of my VHS tapes that aren't bagged for giveaway ... if that helps.

    --

    "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

  62. VHS is still alive and well in our house. by pixelguru · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My daughter figured out how to play the VHS tape of her choice when she was about 14 months old. The process was simple - just jam a durable tape into the big slot, and kick back and watch some Baby Einstein. If the tape won't go in, press the little eject button, remove the old tape and try again. Piece of cake!

    6 months later, she's still working on DVDs. Getting one out of the package is a challenge in itself, and the discs must be handled gently with clean hands (usually we can manage one of those at a time). She knows which button opens the tray, but she's still working on getting the disc centered in the tray, and right side up. The tray is flimsy, and she's almost ripped it off at least once. Even if she gets a disc into the player, she still has to deal with the DVD menu interface or at least press the play button at the appropriate time. This whole process is far from toddler-friendly, but she is determined to figure it out, and I'm willing to let her keep trying as long as she's supervised.

    She's fast though, and last week, before I could stop her, she jammed a DVD into the VCR with great satisfaction after getting frustrated trying to get it to play. For the record, a DVD will fit fully into a VCR, and it took me 10 minutes and a pair of needle nose pliers to get it out.

    1. Re:VHS is still alive and well in our house. by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      Does your DVD still play? Heck i wouldn;t care about the VCR; it will play, as its more robust.

      I had my 2 yrs old son put in a clothes pin into my Sony VCR, and i had to open the case and carefully take it out. But it continued to work without issues.

      Try it with a DVD player and you can kiss it goodbye....

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:VHS is still alive and well in our house. by planetmn · · Score: 1

      Well, in all fairness. DVD players and VCRs manufactured at the same time are about as crappy as each other. The older VCRs (when they were still pretty pricey) were much more rugged than the current ones. People wanted cheap, and cheap is what they got.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    3. Re:VHS is still alive and well in our house. by pixelguru · · Score: 1
      Does your DVD still play?

      There were a couple of scratches in the media after I extricated it, so I ran it through our trusty crank-operated disc polisher, and it's now good as new. If you have a toddler, buy one of those polishers now because you will need it.

      The DVD player itself is holding up fairly well. There was only one incident where she started to lose her balance, grabbed the tray for support, and had to sit through my explanation of what a "load bearing structure" was. It's an old player though (has trouble playing some burned DVDs), and this whole saga might be my back-handed attempt to purchase a new unit should my daughter get creative.

  63. C'mon...It's Variety... by EaTiN+cOfFeE+bEaNs · · Score: 1

    "Variety is like a high school paper. They pay their writers $28 grand a year to find out something to write about the popular kids."
    -Ari Gold (Jeremy Piven), Entourage



    need I say more?

    --
    No TiVo and no caffeine make me something something...
    1. Re:C'mon...It's Variety... by sir_montag · · Score: 1

      That seems rather venomous. I mean, calling Variety a trite dilettante magazine is like saying microsoft doesn't care buggy code.

      Oh.

      Wait...

  64. Don't worry by tokenhillbilly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You paid for the 8-tracks which includes a fair use license for the music. Just rip the music off to Audio Compact Discs or MP3s and destroy the 8-tracks. If you have any questions, just contact the RIAA which will assist you in preserving your rights.

    1. Re:Don't worry by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      You paid for the 8-tracks which includes a fair use license for the music.

      I'm impressed. Not only are you completely wrong, but you're so creatively wrong. Tell the truth, were you being deliberately silly, or did you really think this?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:Don't worry by tokenhillbilly · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, in lawyer school didn't they teach you that "completely and creatively wrong" means the same thing as sarcastic?

    3. Re:Don't worry by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While the terminology is certainly incorrect - there is no fair use "license". On the other hand, we do have the Audio Home Recording Act which states that you have the right to make unlimited copies for personal use...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Don't worry by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      The AHRA isn't quite that broad. It only covers certain types of works, and then only allows for certain media or devices for copying. Ripping something to a computer, putting it on an iPod, etc. do not fall under AHRA. It's also not that limited; it doesn't only cover copying for personal use, but instead covers copying for any noncommercial use.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  65. Electric Dreams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will I get the movies they don't convert to DVD?

  66. Future Variety headline by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

    HIX NIX VHS PIX

  67. Torrenting is easier by funkdancer · · Score: 1

    I find it easier to torrent a television episode that I'm meant to tape for my wife than to set up the VCR to do it for me. Plus, when she gets home from work, that's 15 minutes of ads she doesn't have to forward past.
    Haven't taken the DVR plunge yet as there's no "the one" system in Australia and I'm holding back until HDDVDs are available for HTPC purchase. Would use that to record digitally.

    --
    ISO certified == THX certified
  68. miniDV by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    I'm more excited about miniDV taking a hike in exchange for a hard drive.

    Why do I get the impression that camera manufacturers will be charging exorbitant prices for small capacity hard drives?

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  69. Netcraft? by humble.fool · · Score: 1

    I won't believe it until Netcraft confirms it!

    --
    Being anonymous is not cowardice.
  70. what about home videos? by Red+Australian · · Score: 1

    there are a bunch of people who have whole tapes of home videos, weddings etc that they can't be bothered to move to dvd. for me, I bought a DVD with a HD. I record everything I want, I use editing to take out the commercials. I can set schedules for programs, and then dump them to DVD, take them with me to watch on my laptop, or when we get somewhere. However, the reality is though, its mainly for sports and other live events I want to watch. For TV episodes, its just bit torrent. If you want to live in a commercial world, look at australia. The land where a television showing of the gladiator spans 5 hours to fit in all the commercials, where the last 20 minutes of the movie are stretched over an hour. where an episode of 24 takes 70 minutes, and they still cut bits out, and scrolling ads and text across crucial parts of teh screen.

  71. If any, the VCD died before the VHS... by bliz1985 · · Score: 1

    If any, the VCD died before the VHS in developed nations like American and England that is. In most parts of Asia (less Japan), VCDs are pretty much the rage and the market for DVDs is still small, though that is set to change as DVD players become cheaper. However, as long as VCDs are still being produced and cost less than DVDs, they will not cease to exist as many people just want to watch the movie and are not too concerned about the video quality. This is the case even in Singapore...I should know as I live there.

    For me, I'm hanging onto my VHS until I transfer them all to DVD.

  72. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by scaryice · · Score: 2, Funny

    and yet you read slashdot

  73. Ahhh, 8 tracks - good for at least 30 plays by gondwannabe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, 8 tracks.

    No offense to the late Bill Lear, but how long did he really think that an 'endless' 2 mil sliver of acetate could make that torturous hairpin loop without getting stretched into distortion?

    It's '67, and I'm not sure what's scarier - bad Acid or riding in my buddies old chevy with the Association singing 'aaaannnnndddd thhheeeennnn aaaalllloooonnnnggggg coommmmmmessssss Marrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyyy'

    --
    Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people!
    1. Re:Ahhh, 8 tracks - good for at least 30 plays by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It's '67, and I'm not sure what's scarier - bad Acid or riding in my buddies old chevy with the Association singing 'aaaannnnndddd thhheeeennnn aaaalllloooonnnnggggg coommmmmmessssss Marrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyyy'"

      Well, just fast forward to the end of the 70's....and switch the 8-track from the Association, to either Led Zeppelin, or Klaatu.....the latter especially goes good with that acid.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  74. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by koreth · · Score: 2, Informative
    I never thought I'd say this about anything, but Variety's mangling of English grates on me much more than anything I see in a typical day of browsing Slashdot.

    Mostly because it's so gratuitous. Where normal people would use "comedy," they write "laffer," which in addition to not being an actual word, isn't even any shorter! They use the word "actioner," which my brain always interprets as "auctioneer" at first glance. But at least that saves some characters compared to "action movie," so I can sort of vaguely comprehend why someone might mistake it for a good idea.

  75. Unfortunately,I have by phorm · · Score: 1

    I once had a bad cassette dirty up my tape heads, and the player wouldn't work for videos until I got it cleaned. More recently, I bought a bunch of cheap VHS movies. When I put one of them in, it again dirtied my heads and now the picture and sound are distorted for all the tapes. I'll need to get a tape cleaner again.

    At least scratched DVD's don't cause the player to mess up with your next movie, though I suppose you could have a cracked disk explode or just accumulate dust on the laser lense over time.

  76. Dying very rapidly by newandyh-r · · Score: 1

    Anyone who frequents boot sales in the UK will have noticed that the going price for VHS films is now down to 50p each/3 for £1 or less ... and they'll barely selling at that. The machines still sell - generally to Nigerians who export them in bulk. I think that is evidence of terminal decline - the last signs of life will last a little longer.

  77. And In Other News... by jamstar7 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Water is still wet
    The sky is still (more or less) blue.
    Jack Thompson is still an asshole.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  78. VHS Says by toddhisattva · · Score: 0

    VHS has pronounced "Variety" dead, saying "It takes one to know one."

  79. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by Falladir · · Score: 1
    They use the word "actioner,"...But at least that saves some characters compared to "action movie,"
    ugh. Isn't an "actioner" someone who takes action in a legal sense? I haven't read Variety since I was like 15, I guess I didn't notice their lexical strangness. The page is unavailable, by the way. Maybe they don't get slashdotted very often at that site...
  80. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

    Variety probably doesn't give a hoot about home recording, really. What I saw them declaring dead was the market for selling VHS releases. Just like you can still get cassette players, but good luck finding new albums on cassette.

    The trend reported here isn't the general trend, but the trend from the side of the media providers. That's also why they use the language that the ex-hipsters* that run the business prefer: they're the target readership, not you.

    *actually, ex yuppies that like to pretend that they were hipsters instead of greedy suits-in-training, but that's a minor niggle

  81. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by Chemical · · Score: 1

    Variety is a trade publication. It isn't Entertainment Weekly. Of course they are going to use lingo.

  82. Can't be dead, Borat's got one by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    This VCR.

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  83. Longevity by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    VHS might not be the best in quality or form factor but when people try to play back home burned DVDs of their treasured recordings in a few years time and find they've gone bad, VHS will suddenly look like a good idea. Factor in that when a DVD goes bad you lose a big chunk if not all of a recording whereas with VHS youmight get dropouts or increased grain.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  84. Still in use where I work. by aevan · · Score: 1

    I work in the control room at a racetrack, where we do filming and broadcasting horse and car races.

    In addition to the DVD recorders we've also a bank of VHS VCRs taping raw footage from the cameras. They are primarily for archival purposes and for use in inquiries, but we also sell recordings of the races to the public. Yes, the majority of requests now seem to be more for DVDs, but we still go through boxes of T20 tapes for public consumption. Also judges when asking for tapes of race ask for SVHS, not DVDs (then complain they can't play the SVHS on their VHS-only VCR, but that's another matter).

    Considering the head office just sent us a new trio of VCRs for use, I think news of it's demise have been slightly exaggerated. Still a few more years of use left in them yet.

    Of amusement, a local television station asks us for tapes as well, but they want Beta which is one format we can't do.

  85. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by Duds · · Score: 1

    Although in this case they're right. Even 2 years ago VHS was 1% of sales and 2.5% of rents in the UK. The major chains started dropped VHS players that long ago too.

    This is not premature, this is overdue.

  86. Has this been confirmed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has this been confirmed by Netcra.. oh wait..

  87. VHS will live on because it's DRM free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you just want to pull small extracts out of movies, VHS is much easier to work with than DVD, where you need to rip whole chapters, then edit them down. (At least with my poor skills -- no doubt other /.ers are more proficient). So I for one have been buying many VHS cassettes recently - and the fact that they're dirt cheap doesn't hurt. But admittedly I wouldn't want to sit down and watch a whole feature on VHS anymore.

  88. VCR is the legal alternative to a DVD-R by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    If you want to record movies from TV but dont want to get in trouble, VCR is the way to go. It's analog, so no one can say you have an exact digital copy of something... plus, with years and years of grandfathering against those pesky new laws, you have a perfect defense. The VCR performs a useful function at a very good price, which means it will probably never go completely away. If one day FAR in the future, you go to a movie rental place and they have NO vcr tapes, then it is "dead".

    --
    stuff |
  89. State retention is useful! by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    A few years back I was involved in some tech support for a club night at a local venue that didn't run very frequently and thus didn't have a dedicated staff. They were after a way to play random music videos and other content on a bunch of screens around the venue, and since the venue had a DVD player it was decided that this was the way to go. On the night, the DVD player struggled to read the DVD-R and kept freezing up and needing to be restarted. Consequently we never got more than 45 minutes into the content and kept playing the same stuff over and over -- there were too many other things to do to stand around skipping to the right track.

    The next time we did it I suggested that we just use a VHS tape. I hooked my DVD player up to my VCR and recorded all of the content from the DVD to a VHS video. Then I carted my VCR down to the venue on the night and replaced the DVD player with it. It worked like a charm all night, and everyone was too far away from the screens to notice the loss in detail. At one point we had some kind of outage that killed the video (I wasn't around to see what it was) and once power was restored the video just continued playing where it had left off.

    I for one enjoy the simplicity of VHS for certain applications. Is there an affordable digital format that has this quality of seamless resuming where it left off?

  90. VHS as backup for DVR by fartymenams · · Score: 1

    The hard drive on our DVR started getting too fragmented, so we were having glitches on playback, lots of blocky pixelization and audio drop-outs. The solution, according to user forums, was to reformat the hard drive. We had about 14 hours of programming left on the DVR, so I just used the "Copy to VCR" option and backed it up. Conceivably, if I had a DVD recorder, I could have done the same thing, but putting the VHS machine in SLP mode is far less hassle than burning a disc, waiting for it to finalize, etc.

  91. QUADraphonic 8-track by Secrity · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember that QUADraphonic 8-track was obsolete before the warranties ran out on the players, although QUAD 8-track lasted longer than any of the quad vinyl record formats. I built a Heathkit quad integrated amp (it was cheap because it was discontinued), although I never used it with a quad source.

  92. VHS is a zombie by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    The article stated that as a PRE-RECORDED medium VHS is dead. While specialty videos will be available on VHS for some time, main stream releases from the major studios are now ONLY available on DVD. DVD players could be made a bit more friendly. If the machines were slot loading instead of tray loading they would be more child usuable. If the disks were in caddies (like some kinds of DVD-RAM machines) AND slot loaded the experience would be just like VHS. The problem is that the caddies add to the cost of the media, though they could be an after market add on as the disks ARE removable from the caddies.

    DVD-R (includes +R, RW, and RAM) machines need a way to go. My Toshiba dvdr recorder just stopped working with dvd-r disks, though it will still accept dvd-ram and dvd-rw. It always took like a minute to load a disk (WTF!). Guess I'm going to replace it, probably with one of Panasonic's machines that include a hard disk. (best of both worlds).

    Interesting to see that straight DVD recorders are now becoming a bit rare, most new machines include a VHS recorder built in! Guess we are expected to back up our VHS tapes to DVD because soon we won't be able to buy replacement VCR's?

    Another point, VHS-C camcorders are STILL in production. Blank VHS tapes will probably be available for at least another 5-10 years.

  93. VHS decks and kids... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    Back when I was in HS (and VCRs were still expensive and worth repairing), I worked in a local TV repair shop (remember those?). We would get the occasional VCR in that had matchbox cars, loose change, or even a PB+J sandwich jammed into the slot. Usually a simple repair, but sometimes kids forcing foreign objects (or even a tape inserted incorrectly with force) into a front-load slot would damage the loading mechanism and cost $$$ to repair.

    The older top-loaders were more "kid-proof".

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  94. Where is my stand alone Personal Video Recorder ? by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    The VHS train left my station when we went to HD sets, and the 240 line output was pretty much unwatchable. We still have one hooked up to standard set for the remaining tapes, though. Using an HD DVR, where you have the pause function, is the way to go. I don't archive, usually and rarely watch the same movie twice, so this is not an issue for me. I will buy an HD DVR with a HD/Blu DVD burner, though, although our screwed up CE industry won't make one for a while. Along with an inability to agree on a high def format for discs, they are either so afraid or owned by the Studios that they won't allow even minimal time shifting without a controlled PVR, controlled by your cable or sat company. I have a standalone OTA HD DVR, with no fees or rental agreements....it is, of course, out of production, and there are no others in the pipeline. Oh well, I suppose it is not in the cable co's best interest for you to own your own DVR with a cable card stuffed in the back, rather than renting their gadget forever. We live in a world where there should be high def players, and high def pvrs on all the Shortcircutworstbuy big box store shelves next to the big screens. These items don't exist because some big boys don't want them there. Capitalism is not the paradigm for media today....oliglopoly is.

  95. Virtual Blockbuster by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    In my town, all the Blockbuster videos went bankrupt, and the nearest independant video store is miles away. So, I have a alternative - popping down the local used CD/music store when I want to "Rent" a video, buy a used VHS tape for $1 (Cheaper then renting when Blockbuster was still around!) and if I don't want to keep it, just toss it out when I'm done watching it. Sure there is Netflix, but sometimes you just don't want to wait a couple days. Oh and recording? Haven't done that in years.

  96. videotape was never 8-track by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Or are y'all too young to remember that 8-track had no record - which, of course, is why I never bought into it, and stuck with cassettes.

                  mark

    1. Re:videotape was never 8-track by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      You must be too young to remember that you could get 8-track blanks and recorders. No, they weren't as popular, but if you do some hunting around (antique stores mainly), you will find them (shocked me when I first saw them, too)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  97. Killing spree! by ppswede · · Score: 1

    Killing spree! Why HD-DVD and Blu-ray Are DOA http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/ 16/1844235 EMI Exec Says 'The Music CD is Dead' http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/27/171122 3 Music Labels Screwed, DRM Is Dead http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/05/08 46213

  98. Bury it next to.... by Carcass666 · · Score: 1

    My floppy drive, my fat-client PC, bloated government, metal CD's and countless other things that those in the "know" have deemed dead.

  99. How timely. by stile99 · · Score: 1

    So Variety is declaring VHS dead after TiVo already held a funeral for the VCR?

    I can't wait for their next bit of breaking news. Perhaps it will involve the sales of color TVs surpassing sales of black and white?

    Or maybe an item about these new films I hear about, what are they calling them? Talkies?

  100. We all knew it was coming. Besides, that's not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until VHS players themselves go the way of the 8-track player?
    So buy a DVD recorder already, sheesh. I admit they aren't super-cheap, but, if you are that worried about all the VCRs in the world suddenly breaking down (and bear in mind that in this day and age it's still technically possible to find the rare Betamax system that still works) it's not such an expensive investment to solve the problem. More importantly, tapes are degradable media. Even just sitting around in the perfect conditions (eg no air, perfectly regulated temperatures, etc) they will slowly degrade. Every time you play them they degrade some tiny amount, so each copy you make is of a lower quality than the previous. On the other hand, while DVDRs (and similar media) degrade over time, copies are 100% provided you didn't wait until after the media started degrading beyond good readability to make the duplicate. So, frankly, if you have VHS videos you care about, you should have been switching to DVD recordings a long time ago.

    PS. These days you can find DVD recorders for less than $100 and Taiyo Yuden DVD media (eg high quality discs that will last and stay as readable as long as you can hope) for just under $20 for a 50 pack (counting shipping.) If you have any VHS tapes you really really need to survive, it's not going to get much easier or cheaper to copy them and the longer you wait the more they degrade.

  101. VHS and 8-track by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    In my house (and I'm not a gadget freak), we got rid of VHS years ago, just to save space. As far as I'm concerned, they've already gone the way of the 8-track. Sure, like others have commented, they were easier for kids to play, but I got tired of my kids ruining the tapes (and the players), so I'm glad to have that additional complexity that comes with DVD. If the toddler can't open the DVD case--fantastic!

    The only VHS tape still in the house is my wedding video, and that's just because we don't have a working player to push the content to our PC.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  102. Data Reincarnation by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Will VHS be the last format to die and take its data with it? Digital formats like CD, DVD and WAV/MP3/AAC have physical media formats distinct from their data formats. Lossless copying (of even lossy data) means the data images can live forever, transferred from doomed physical media to new (doomed) physical media. Whether that media is some kind of disk, removable or fixed, or solid state, or eventually holographic, nanotech, psychic friends network, whatever.

    Of course, every replacement of copyrighted content you've made has multiplied the revenue of the copyright licenser, and thereby multiplied manifold the profits (10% profit on the first copy, plus maybe 50-90% profit on each subsequent replacement). So copyright holders perpetuate their copyrights beyond any proportion to the necessary protected return on investment "to promote progress in science and the useful arts". Even prohibiting the clearly fair use of moving content you "own" to backup disks. Because they see the privilege of keeping you consuming your favorite content as their god-given right, rooted in a contract they signed with a producer once for a few weeks of work decades ago, while the consumers did most of the work keeping it popular after the initial blast of creation.

    The god of dollar, the rights of an artificial government monopoly. Vs a global networked storage daemon. Who survives their armageddon?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Data Reincarnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right -- they go way too far, especially with crap like the DMCA -- but, the cool thing here is that DMCA only says it's illegal to make backups of copy protected stuff. That means most of more irreplacable stuff in a VHS collection such as home videos or old not so super-popular movies will be safe to copy since most of those will have no protections of any kind on them.

      I only hope that someday someone will catch on to reality and get rid of crap like the DMCA so we can backup stuff we legally own rather than continuing with this crap where they expect you to buy a whole new copy if you loose/break your old one. Especially considering that you can't always buy a new copy (like with old software/games) so essentially you're screwed in such cases since they won't sell it to you, won't allow you to download it, and also won't allow you to make a backup of an old disc. Don't you just love the legal system (especially our crappy American one)?

    2. Re:Data Reincarnation by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The infomediary industry is already more rich and powerful than the old info ownership industry. Delivering, analyzing, associating, remixing/remastering is more lucrative and demanded than the original source material. Even the copyright industry is mostly infomediaries, who locked up rights to copy info from its producers, but who don't do most of the copying people want. They're basically just lawyers who bottleneck the growth of really popular, powerful, lucrative media communications.

      So although the copyright industry has a lot of legal and biz momentum, they'll lose to the bigger forces. Both the biz interests, and the vast, complex array of global humans with new power to ignore the lawyers and share the content anyway. The more biz gets on that bandwagon, the more doomed is the copyright industry.

      Except maybe in lucrative niches like licensing free pop content for specific promotional reuses, like ad jingles and movie soundtracks. Leaving the copyright weasels a good place like that to continue spawning without getting in the way of the popularity engine that keeps us all afloat will relieve the pressure, letting the new equilibrium favor sharing that makes the tiny controlled fraction even more profitable.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  103. PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have not touch the VHS since I got the PVR a couple of years ago.

    My wife quickly filled up the PVR with must keep Oprah episodes and it auotmaticly deletes the old ones to make room for any new we record. Before she keep dozens of tapes around with a single must keep episode somewhere in the middle to the tape. Now it gets delete automaticly and she has not even noticed that those must keep episode where delete years ago.

  104. VHS going away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt it. VHS will never entirely disappear, as other technologies like ADAT make use of SVHS cassettes to be able to record multiple audio tracks, and it is a recording-industry standard.

  105. Re:VHS can never die, at least until... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2
    VHS won't die until the HTPC appliance fully matures

    You're bang-on there... They also have to fall in price. My parents 'program' their VCR all the time, and they bought it for $40 from Future Shop. VCRs have a huge anount of functionality for a very low price.

  106. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Amen to that... and it's true, of course. It doesn't take a genius to see. And anyway we all know that VHS recording is being kept alive by the poor. Soon as DVD recorders are fifty bucks, VHS will finally die the final death that it so deserves to die. What a pile of crap VHS is. (It was totally sweet at the time, but these days it's just pathetic. I mean, you can't even pause without damaging your media!)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  107. Wishing it dead will not make it so by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    VHS is incredibly useful powerful protocol for analog video recording...which is exactly what content providers want to discourage. DVD recording is a digital process that is much more easily controlled by future DRM restrictions. VHS also provides a long-term high-capacity stable magnetic storage format that the DVD optical recording does not. A vhs tape can easily last for 50+ years while the non-pressed dvd optical burn format can be compromised in only a few years by mold and humidity. Historians in 200 years are more likely to be watching old vhs tapes than they are dvd videos.

  108. VHS still most dependable, and stateful is good by ZeissIcon · · Score: 1

    I teach in a film program and am also the assistant artistic director for a film festival. Our preferred format for most tasks is VHS. Here's why. Of the thousand or so submissions we get to the festival each year, the prescreening copies that come in on DVD have a failure rate of approximately 20%. This is a combination of bad media, damaged media, or incorrectly authored media. Our VHS failure rate is 0%. We have never gotten a bad VHS tape. The only advantage to a DVD is that most computers will recognize NTSC, PAL and SECAM discs while multiformat VHS players are particularly expensive, as are multiformat monitors. On the other hand, getting your PAL or SECAM tape dubbed to NTSC VHS is generally pretty cheap. Since 80% of our submissions are from overseas, this is particularly critical for us.

    In the classes that I teach, it is very common to show clips from movies to illustrate a concept or start a discussion. Students are given assignments to compile clips and present them. Having a student load a DVD, wait for the FBI warning, wait for the studio graphics to go by, wait for the menu to load, skip to the nearest chapter point, fast forward to the clip, have the DVD get stuck, etc. is a complete waste of time. Much better for them to take the DVDs to our lab, put it in one of the CSS-removal players and dub it to VHS -- this means we can spend our time in class just looking at the clip (and this academic use is exactly why fair use exemptions are in the law, lawyers). The same is true of cueing a VHS tape. You cue it, and when you take it to class, it's still cued. See above about cueing DVDs.

    We are going to continue to use VHS for as long as we can, and don't even get me started about CSS and Macrovision, Feh.

  109. Where's the digital alternative? by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

    We still have a VCR because my wife records a lot of shows for playback at her convenience. I would gladly buy her a DVR, but i can't find one that doesn't require either (a) a monthly subscription fee for services we don't need, or (b) hook-up to a PC. It seems like a stand-alone digital (hard-drive based) recorder should be simple to implement - why am i not seeing them on the market?

    --
    I am not a number - I am a free man!
    1. Re:Where's the digital alternative? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      ?!?!?

      DVD recorders with (and without) internal HDs are all over the place!

      You can also use DVD-RW disks for recording single watch material. And the machines act exactly like VHS except record to DVD. Even the ones that allow you to hook up to a service for more ease of setup for recording don't generally REQUIRE it for it to work. I don't use it on my toshiba...

      here are a few:
      http://www.tacp.toshiba.com/dvd/dvdrecorder.asp

      VHS is dead for any new recording that is for sure. However, everyones collections of VHS will of course sit around till it rots or 100 cups of coffie later are transferred to DVD...

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  110. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by canajin56 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, my VCR broke and I tried to buy a new one. I tried Best Buy, Zellers, Future Shop. Each only carried one model, it was all the same model. I had to buy that one, and it saddens me. Its oldschool, it won't record the shows you have scheduled to tape unless you turn the power off and press the "Activate Timer" button. Damn, my parents ancient BETACORD from the 70s works the same way...

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  111. Off-tracking screen noise has replaced old tv by oldwarrior · · Score: 0

    transmissions of network static and frequency shifting wavyness. Hard to explain what a near unwatchable B/W TV was like on a small set with a hanger and tinfoil antenna. (And, by golly, we were glad to have it!)

    --
    If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
  112. VHS still has a lot of space by toxicity69 · · Score: 1

    VHS is still superior for amatuer recording and editing of video footage. Just recently I decided I wanted to record some footage from a computer game. To record it directly to a hard drive would take up 1 gigabyte per 10 minutes of footage, and would consume a lot of CPU/hard drive/memory time in the process, while already playing a CPU/hard drive/memory intensive computer game. In addition, when writing it to DVDs, if I didn't like the first edition, thats the end of that DVD. Compared with tape, and a video card with a tv-out component plug however; I just plug in a VCR, play away, and record up to four hours per tape. After playing I use my Ati All-In-Wonder card to bring the better footage back to the computer, while not playing a game and so not using resources; I can then edit it how I want, and re-record over the tape until I achieve perfection; and the final cut goes to a tape that I can take to my buddys house.

  113. Go Sarasota! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's my county you're talking about, buddy. Kathy Dent, our Supervisor of Elections, has been in denial of the problems with paperless voting.

    It doesn't matter to me who wins, as long as we can assure voters that our votes are being counted.

    Check it out on newscoast.com, Sarasota's local paper.

  114. Re:Consider the source... if you can understand th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not trade lingo. No one - not even in Hollywood - talks like they write. Some editor there just thinks it's clever - like a 12-year-old who's learned a new word - and the idiots who read Variety apparently think that their ability to understand the "cool" kids makes them cool.

  115. VHS still has one advantage over DVD by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    You can re-record onto VHS multiple times. I can see for movie rentals how this is a moot point, of course, but for home recording, I think lots of people still record a show while they're away on VHS to do time-shifting.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  116. You couldn't be wronger by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    Porn embraced DVD because DVDs are cheaper to make than VHS. I noticed my local porn store had mostly dvds way before regular video stores did. Most online actual media porn sellers switched over 5 years ago to mostly DVD.

    There are way more porn titles on DVD than VHS, and there have been for many years. Plus, you're wrong about debbie does dallas.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  117. Bite Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VCR's are doing just fine. I have three of them recording TV shows for me. The only problem is programming them, not getting the programs entered, but figuring out when the shows I want to watch are on. I have 3 of them because these fucking networks tend to run their best shows at the same time. Over the last couple of years the PBS stations got some sense and instead of going to static at night, rerun their shows all night, so I can tape them outside of so-called prime-time.

    Tivo-like DVRs are nice in that they do the timing for you, but they are non-portable, not even room to room, unless you like reaching behind things and moving cables. Plus you have to watch the shows rather quickly or they will fill up. When a tape is full you just put a new tape in. If you own a DVR, you can hack it and put the drive into a removable drive tray, but if you rent it from the cable company, try that and see what happens on your next service call. Pigs will fly before the industry makes a DVR you can swap drives with, at least not without some fucking DRM that won't let you play the drive in a friends DVR, or it doesn't expire after a couple of weeks, etc.

    The really nice thing about VCRs is they are something I own and I control. At least Tivo can be hacked, the older ones anyway, but these units your get from the cable company are a DRM nightmare. The thin end of the whole trusted computing nightmare. Ever see Clock-Work Orange, watching TV will become like Alex's aversion therapy sessions. You'll pay through the roof for it, can't be mobile with it, and all your files will expire, plus all your viewing habits are grist for the dataminers to mill.

    By declaring the death of VCRs corporate media shills are showing how loyal they are to the company. Which wants your freedome to end, so their wallets get fatter.

  118. audio/videophiles on crack by sir_montag · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, but audiophiles and videophiles are on crack. For the average consumer, DVD is the better solution in every way that matters.

    While I am a bit of a closet audiophile, I suffer from no delusions that the CD and MP3 have killed vinyl as a audio format. Who still uses it? DJ's, audiophiles, and kids that like "antique things". When that's the user base of a product, it is dead in every way that matters.

    So is VHS. Let's not be silly about it now.