Slashdot Mirror


Indian Software Firm Outsourcing Jobs To US

phobos13013 writes "NPR is reporting Indian software maker Wipro is outsourcing positions to a development office opening in Atlanta, Georgia. Although it sounds good for US job growth, the implication is that firms outside the US appear to be dominating more and more in the global economy, even from developing and underdeveloped regions of the world. Similarly, salaries of IT professionals world-wide are projected to stagnate or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today."

444 comments

  1. Ah India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our greatest friend and ally!... After the UK, Australia, Canada, and of course Bosnia.

    1. Re:Ah India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Our greatest friend and ally!... After the UK, Australia, Canada, and of course Bosnia. Don't forget Poland!
    2. Re:Ah India. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or Iraq!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Ah India. by C0C0C0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget Poland!
      No. Seriously. Who modded this "Funny"? Poland has been our ally since the Revolutionary War. They sent troops to Iraq. They are the Europeans that don't hate us.

      Totally off topic, but, for real: They are a huge US ally.

      --
      You are totally blocking my view of the wall. - Dogbert
    4. Re:Ah India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I can't stand is Pakis pissing on their neighbors. And your cricket team blows.

    5. Re:Ah India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Poland!

      No. Seriously. Who modded this "Funny"? Poland has been our ally since the Revolutionary War. They sent troops to Iraq. They are the Europeans that don't hate us.



      Totally off topic, but, for real: They are a huge US ally.

      Dude, that was not a Polack joke. That was a Bush joke. Google it.
    6. Re:Ah India. by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      oh for heaven's sake, one "i-wont-sign-up" coward says something against hindus, and u think thats a paki? geez! maybe it could be someone of another nationality? u ever ponder how big slashdot's readership really is? and "towelhead"? i don't think any paki can even comprehend such a word, let alone use... and to the american un-initiated, cricket is an extremely cool game, and it beats baseball on all counts... *devilishly giggles as a cricket-baseball flamewar erupts*

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    7. Re:Ah India. by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      and to the american un-initiated, cricket is an extremely cool game, and it beats baseball on all counts... Awww... why didn't you just start a 'vi vs. emacs' flame war - that, at the very least, would be somewhat resolvable.
      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  2. qualified applicants? by oni · · Score: 5, Funny

    large pool of qualified applicants in the market today

    qualified. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means

    1. Re:qualified applicants? by heelrod · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, I dont think I would use the word qualified.

      But hey, with the way software gets crappier and crappier, I guess they are

    2. Re:qualified applicants? by cromar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Qualified to be payed 20k more than me while knowing less than me after being in the field longer than me and qualified to get promoted to another dept with higher salary. Qualified to write really shitty code I have to maintain^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hrewrite. (And, apparently, qualified to teach a C class once or twice - shudder.)

      See, the word isn't misused, it's that the qualifications have little to do with skill or... anything besides politics and ignorance.

    3. Re:qualified applicants? by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you are going to outsource code, do it to someplace COLD. The Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, Russia, etc. All of those countries seem to have unusually large supply of good coders. The only problem is that you end up with functions like b0rk(B0rk *bork) { }

    4. Re:qualified applicants? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Qualified: appears to or on paper seems to be able to do the job. usually appears alongside a plethora of assorted "certifications" to further build on the assumption that the person is capable of doing the job.

      Experienced: Has solid proof of abilities, usually lack certifications as Experienced professionals look down upon the certifications as most are nothing more than proof you can memorize and take a test. Very few certifications hold merit with seasoned and experienced professionals. The ones that do are held in high regard.

      Basically to tell the difference, the more certifications a person has the greater the possibility that they are simply a useless tool. Yes I have tested this in real life. when looking for a outsourced programming company the ones that all the clients have the MOST trouble with are the ones that touted all kinds of certifications the employees need. ALSO many times these companies will violate your terms on the contract. I have had to inform clients on several occasions to pay for the removal of OSS code or not release their product or release the source code in order to be compliant with the law. The Outsourced firm used GPL libraries and snippets, even left the original headers and comments in there. That was 3 years ago though when I was a Code Monkey in Corporate America. I am certain it has not gotten any better.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lumpy, what is a plethora? Well, you just told me that I had a plethora, and I would just like to know if
      you know what it means to have a plethora. I would not like to think that someone would tell someone else
      he has a plethora, and then find out that that person has *no idea* what it means to have a plethora.

    6. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plethora :

      1. overabundance; excess: a plethora of advice and a paucity of assistance.

      This is high school remedial English vocabulary.

    7. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, the 3 amigos........... You remind me of a young "Dusty Bottoms"

    8. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is a plethora?

      It's kind of like a cornucopia, but without the all that boyloving Greek mythology all over it.

    9. Re:qualified applicants? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Plethora: a condition of uncontrollable explosive foamy diarrhea.

      Example, "After those tacos I ended up with a nasty plethora all night long".

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said day when only 1 person got the 3 amigos reference. Gesh people, netflix is
      cheap watch some good movies now an again. Some other must see movies:

      Airplane, Police Squad, I'm gonna git you sucka, NL Vacation, NL Xmas Vacation, Space Balls

    11. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't get the "qualified" in fast enough when I read this......
      Just because someone "passes" some sort of test doesn't make them qualified. \
      Qualified is not someone going to some sort of technical school for 6 months or a year.

    12. Re:qualified applicants? by megaditto · · Score: 0, Troll

      Qualified to be payed 20k more than me while knowing less than me

      That's a basic right of every US citizen. If you don't like it, apply for a green card/U.S. citizenship yourself.
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    13. Re:qualified applicants? by tjr · · Score: 1

      After seeing lots of colleagues with certifications framed and hanging on their cubicle walls, I thought maybe my career would be brighter if I too got some certifications. So I decided to get the CompTIA Security+ certification. I bought a "study guide", inhaled said study guide, and passed the exam on my first try.

      While I certainly did learn some things about information security, the certification itself seems to serve basically as proof that I could read and understand the study guide.

      I went ahead and framed the printed certificate and put it on my desk. I have no plans to get any more.

    14. Re:qualified applicants? by witte · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Poland.

    15. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because they can overclock their systems by 300% just by opening the window.

    16. Re:qualified applicants? by kalirion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are those countries populated by Trolls with silicon brains?

    17. Re:qualified applicants? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      If you are going to outsource code, do it to someplace with blackjack, and hookers. The Netherlands,

      There, fixed that for you.

    18. Re:qualified applicants? by trollboy · · Score: 1

      If you are going to outsource code, do it to someplace with blackjack, and hookers. Las Vegas, Nevada, Typo's abound today. ;-)
      --
      That which is not dead may eternal lie,and in strange aeons even death may die
    19. Re:Qualified Applicants? by scottsk · · Score: 1

      I've certainly noticed this. Many times a job description will have a set of skills, but something totally off-the-wall tacked on. Like a J2EE developer familiar with Solaris, but also needs to know ColdFusion. Or a low-level UNIX systems programmer, ASP.net experience helpful. And so on. I wonder if they do it just to create a set of requirements no one can fill?

    20. Re:Qualified Applicants? by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 1

      I think that and a healthy dose of the usual HR obliviousness ("10 years experience with Windows XP" anyone?) explain it pretty well.

      --
      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
    21. Re:Qualified Applicants? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I think that and a healthy dose of the usual HR obliviousness ("10 years experience with Windows XP" anyone?) explain it pretty well.

      There certainly is a lot of that. Hiring managers do tend to make guesses^Westimates of how much experience with X might be needed, and not being techies themselves, they are often not aware of minor details such as how long X might have been around. It's the old "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity" adage.

      But my talks with HR people have made it clear that it's not always ignorance or stupidity. In some (probably unknowable) fraction of the cases, the long list of impossible requirements is often done intentionally, to minimize the chances that an actually "qualified" applicant will show up.

      If you want to see a blatant explanation of this, youtube has an interesting video that you might enjoy. It's a lawyer giving a talk that's essentially a HOWTO on the topic. There are also a number of followup videos that show you some of the debate.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    22. Re:qualified applicants? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Well, as I understand it...

      Qualified. As you say - has passed some kind of exam or test - and increasingly work experience or peer review - leading to an academic or professional 'qualification'. May or not be relevant to the job you need doing, although hopefuly you have done your homework. Will probably have initial difficulty applying their knowledge to your situation.

      Experienced. Has worked or otherwise lived through something which has hopefully added knowledge (what you know) and skills (what you know how to do). May or not be relevant to your needs, and will probably have difficulty 'unlearning' things whilst also - as above -adapting to your situation.

      Competent. Defined as the 'ability to achieve a required result', (normally well-defined tasks to perform in the context of a process or processes). I don't hire 'qualified' or 'experienced' people - I get competent people. They are harder to find, and you have to pay 'em more, but it's well worth it.

    23. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are an American programmer that gets 20k less than someone with similar skills/years? What is the problem with you? Do you only know like VB crap or something? How the hell do you get paid 20k less than someone with similar skills/years?

      Are you fat and smelly?

    24. Re:qualified applicants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOl, good job you beat me to it. The myth that Indian consultants are all some sort of super coders is right up there with the one about all mexicans being hard working. Both of these are basically racist comments - I find it amusing that racism is ok when it's a lie that benefits the agrieved party.

      My experience has been quite the opposite. With both statements.

    25. Re:qualified applicants? by Ghost+Hedgehog · · Score: 1

      The Netherlands and COLD??? The last winters were so warm, that we now directly move from autumn to spring in the Netherlands.

  3. Hey, its not like.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hey, it's not like we didn't willingly give it all away...

    We freely sent off our manufacturing, then our IT, and a good bit of agriculture. But thankfully, we still have a great service industry, lots of restaurants, etc. That'll keep us safe in times of financial/world troubles.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Hey, its not like.... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's not like it depends only on whether US decides, or not, to give it/something away.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Hey, its not like.... by bnenning · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US manufacturing output is at a record high (PDF). It's true that fewer Americans are employed in the manufacturing sector, because efficiency has increased so much. This is good, for the same reasons that free software is good.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    3. Re:Hey, its not like.... by StevisF · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe we're not making 50 cent squeak toys here anymore, but we are making things like commercial aircraft, power system components, and large construction and earth moving equipment which all these developing nations will need. I heard on CNBC recently that the US still has the largest amount of exports in dollars each year, 20% vs China at 8%. We're making very complex products in the US which require very skilled labor and quality on every level and that's something we should be proud of.

    4. Re:Hey, its not like.... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We freely sent off our manufacturing, then our IT, and a good bit of agriculture. But thankfully, we still have a great service industry, lots of restaurants, etc. That'll keep us safe in times of financial/world troubles. Actually. It's pretty much all caused by the petrodollar.

      You're too expensive because the petrodollar tends to deflate. There's high demand for dollars to pay for oil, the world over. It makes Americans expensive.

      The current world troubles are caused by the US interest in preventing the dollar from losing it's reserve status. Iraq, Iran, Saudi etc.

      The current financial problems are caused by the dollar being a debt based currency. Debt increases exponentially, it requires exponentially increasing economy and additional loans to service the debt and continue growing. So liquidity is piled in exponentially, the debts grow accordingly. Eventually you have to get even those unable to pay involved, in order to continue the growth. The crash is inevitable, nothing can grow exponentially forever. However the longer the growth period the bigger the bump. In the past few years the central banks have piled in cash in order to glide over some of the smaller bumps, basically just lining up for a bigger crash later. It's more of an issue right now because the dollar has become less desirable internationally forcing up interest rates.
      --
      Deleted
    5. Re:Hey, its not like.... by megaditto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To play devil's advocate here, not everybody benefits from improved efficiency. Old, undereducated, less intelligent people cannot easily retrain. This 'they-stole-my-jerb' croud still gets to vote however, so something must be done about their issues.

      Sure, some are able to put away their pickaxe or lathe, take up Game Theory or Biochemistry books and courses, and grow into their new high-tech workplace. The others (in America) were better off before globalization moved in.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    6. Re:Hey, its not like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is good, for the same reasons that free software is good.

      This comparison is so far off that it's not even worth going into much. The first is good for economics while the second has yet to prove itself economically (with history going against it to boot).

    7. Re:Hey, its not like.... by rocker_wannabe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Am I supposed to believe a document from an organization that is interested in promoting moving manufacturing to China or the fact that I can't find very many products with "Made in the USA" on them. The manufacturing organizations that I have visited employ mostly Hispanics that don't speak English very well. This leads me to believe that many of them are illegal immigrants that are subsidized by our federal government.

      I don't believe the "increased efficiency" for a minute. What I have witnessed is an actual DECREASE in efficiency that has been made up for by using low-wage immigrants. If companies pay half as much for labor (including benefits) they are ahead of the game as long as the employee doesn't take more than twice as long.

      --
      "Meaningless!, Meaningless!" says the Teacher. "Utterly meaningless!"
    8. Re:Hey, its not like.... by Surt · · Score: 1

      We just need to build big boxes to put them in, equipped with xbox360s and a food supply. Call them 'the forcefully retired'. Wait for them to die. Problem solved.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Hey, its not like.... by hswerdfe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In theory an abstract concept, say like the money supply can technically increase forever.
      I do agree with you about debt based money being bad, and basically your whole post, except that small point. Because in theory our money supply is slowly losing its connection with the real world. IE the connection to work done and actual physical objects made or removed from the ground.

      --
      --meh--
    10. Re:Hey, its not like.... by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      US manufacturing output is at a record high (PDF). It's true that fewer Americans are employed in the manufacturing sector, because efficiency has increased so much.
      I'm sorry, but I don't buy it. If what you say were true, then we'd still see a lot of consumer goods with "Made in USA" on them. But we don't. Everything I've seen is manufactured elsewhere (China in particular), with the exception of some automobiles. The bullshit claims of a paper are no match for real world experience.
      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    11. Re:Hey, its not like.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It's not like it depends only on whether US decides, or not, to give it/something away."

      No, but, in the past, it was the American instinct (way) when competing for 'anything' be it financial, technical, war, what-have-you, it was to go all out, 110% to win. That's how we attained the position we did...but, we've lost that attitude, that drive to do what it takes to win and succeed.

      Personally, I think maybe it has been due in part over recent years...to try to dumb down the schools so as not to hurt the less gifted students. It has been the movement to remove true competition from school and extracurricular games. "We can't have losers, it might hurt little Suzy's self esteem."

      I think in a large sense, we've brought this upon ourselves with this kind of thinking while raising the past few generations. We don't raise our kids to be successful individuals any more in general....and IMHO, we're doing them such a disservice in deluding them into thinking it is a nice, happy world where everyone cooperates, shares and gets along. They are in for a big surprise, and I think what we see here with the loss of home grown production, and apathy towards being truly the best you can, and the failure to instill the drive to succeed and win into past couple of generations.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Hey, its not like.... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Well, for the money supply to grow, the amount of debt also has to grow, and you have to get someone generate that debt. They have to take a loan out based on some collateral. With the economy having to grow exponentially, you eventually run out of people to loan to. Or rather, you start loaning to people who can't really afford it. Hey what's the problem, the interest rates are low. Except that you're also increasing the money supply as you loan, which increases inflation which increases interest rates which causes default on the loan. Bump. It's just a slightly bigger bump than usual.

      --
      Deleted
    13. Re:Hey, its not like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because going into debt every decacde to retrain for a new career, just because your government condones giving away jobs to the cheapest bidder overseas is a brilliant idea.

      By the way, I'm all for shipping the jobs to the cheapest employee around the globe... just as soon as I'm able to realistically buy milk at Chinese prices and rent my apartment at Indian rental rates. After all, how am I supposed to compete when I am forced by the country I live in to require a certain level of expenses for the cost of living?

    14. Re:Hey, its not like.... by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      We have a middle class because we're not efficient. But what happens when you have more supply than demand for products? It's the 70's all over again.

      Not everyone is above average and to be honest if you paid people according to their value, 20% or fewer coders would have 80% or more of the money. But who can afford to pay for their products?

    15. Re:Hey, its not like.... by aevans · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, it's the agriculture that keeps the world's gonads firmly within our grip. The US grows most of the world's food. The old saw about China imports more rice from California than it grows itself might not be true anymore, but we're still the world's breadbasket, and not likely to lose the title anytime soon. Seasonal fruits are imported from places like Chile and New Zealand just for freshness's sake. Now, environmental restrictions are the reason that things like timber, fishing, and mining have been outsourced to an extent.

    16. Re:Hey, its not like.... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      'Open borders' would address your concerns. Currently, money and jobs are free to cross the borders while people are locked in (out).

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    17. Re:Hey, its not like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things:

      1) Equating someone with a pickaxe to someone who operates a lathe is like equating someone who programs in BASIC to someone who programs in C. I don't see many pickaxe operators making $20-30/hour.

      2) If said person works really hard at understanding programming and computer science, maybe even gets a degree, they are not experienced. Therefore, they are virtually unemployable in today's market with so many experienced people out of work. Perhaps if they're 21 and fresh out of college, they can get an internship...

    18. Re:Hey, its not like.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      To play devil's advocate here, not everybody benefits from improved efficiency. Old, undereducated, less intelligent people cannot easily retrain.
      The idea is that society as a whole benefits. Assume some old guy loses his job and is unable to be retrained. He can still do menial jobs for a low wage. Meanwhile, the overall price of goods continues to drop due to increased efficiency. He can afford to buy more with less. Not only that, but his family is also able to buy more with less, meaning they can set aside more money to help him along. 10 years down the road he's dead, new generations are no longer training to fill his now obsolete job, and can instead focus on other fields. And we are still able to produce more goods than we originally could, at a lower cost.

      Ergo, everyone benefits :)
    19. Re:Hey, its not like.... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      You can all get rich opening doors for each other.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    20. Re:Hey, its not like.... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      The current financial problems are caused by the dollar being a debt based currency. Debt increases exponentially, it requires exponentially increasing economy and additional loans to service the debt and continue growing.

      That's a common misconception but it's not correct. Money circulates - there's no need for the money supply to increase via new loans to pay off older loans. You can simply earn the interest payments back from the bank and use them for the next cycle. There is no mathematical reason why our economies are forced to grow, and Japan in recent times was an example of a system that didn't.

    21. Re:Hey, its not like.... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      One can wonder if the attitude of "go all out, 110% to win" is sustainable in society over longer periods of time...perhaps it's better in the long term to be a little more lax, focused on not so large immediate achievements.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  4. This could be a new meme... by Hanners1979 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In India, jobs outsource to you!

  5. I love this game! by Champ · · Score: 5, Funny

    U.S. companies outsourcing jobs to foreign countries: bad for the U.S.

    Foreign companies outsourcing jobs to the U.S.: bad for the U.S.

    1. Re:I love this game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      U.S. companies outsourcing jobs to foreign countries: bad for the U.S.

      Foreign companies outsourcing jobs to the U.S.: bad for the U.S. Of course it doesn't actually mean what the editor's comments say. All we can really conclude is that the Indian company found labor more accessible and/or cheaper in the USA. Or has some totally irrational motive, for all we know.

      Doesn't say anything about labor prices either. If it was outsourced because they couldn't find enough cheap labor in India, that's *good* news for wages.
    2. Re:I love this game! by Reverend528 · · Score: 1

      When a US company outsources to another US company, it's a win for the US.

    3. Re:I love this game! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      bad because it's work for other Foreign companies not growth by US companies. So even the "corporate masters" are foreign now!
      But it is a good thing because US workers really do know their stuff as much as their bosses badmouth them. US workers still increase actual productivity faster than anyplace else they're just not "cheaper" when you front billions of dollars of new capital for new plants .... elsewhere.

    4. Re:I love this game! by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Pretty much. As funny as it sounds, both are bad, at least if they represent large scale trends. Option one means America's labor force is not competitive. The other means that the other countries now have first world economies, infrastructure, and most importantly that the dollar has become so weak that American labor is now cheap.



      This is not a case of saying all news is bad news. These two items do not represent the only options. Both are flip-sides of America now being a bad place for capital investment. You can thank our massive beucracies, regulations, byzantine and high tax codes, and increasing Statist tendancies for that. Most of the capital investment is being put into foreign markets now because it can be grown more rapidly due to freer markets and less taxation. The engines of the global economy are less and less centered in the U.S. We are looking at becoming a low-wage work farm for the new economic powerhouses building up around the world. We'll all have jobs, just not good ones.

    5. Re:I love this game! by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      My first guess is that if it's a call center or similar service center they wanted a base station full of employees that American callers are more likely to feel comfortable with. We've seen plenty of stories about companies putting their call centers in the midwest or in oregon because they sound friendly and comforting to American callers, why wouldn't an Indian company with a lot of state side customers do the same?

    6. Re:I love this game! by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Foreign companies outsourcing jobs to the U.S.: bad for the U.S.

      At least it will be a refreshing change for customers from Mumbai to complain about the incomprehensible accents of the Atlanta call center employees...

    7. Re:I love this game! by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other, more upscale angle, is that they need local US resources to work directly with clients to help develop specifications and drive the implementation of stuff developed offshore...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    8. Re:I love this game! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, it is.

      The reason is that the US are, compared to the country outsourcing to/from, a "highly developed" country. Basically it means that when jobs move overseas that the jobs are lost (and people are unemployed), when some "underdeveloped" country moves jobs to the US it means that the wages can be dumped so low that it is actually cheaper to do it in the US.

      Nobody said that global economy is good for the individual, it's good for the corporations.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:I love this game! by homer_s · · Score: 1

      If it was outsourced because they couldn't find enough cheap labor in India, that's *good* news for wages.

      No, that is good news for you and me who work in the software industry because we will make more money in the short term.

      It is bad news to consumers of software services - companies (and hence their customers).

    10. Re:I love this game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is possible that Wipro is positioning to be able to work with US companies that are not comfortable working with offshore delivery centers.

    11. Re:I love this game! by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 2

      Nobody said that global economy is good for the individual, it's good for the corporations.
      I'm sure many Indians and Chinese will completely agree with that. Imagine, having an actual job that pays money and gives a career perspective versus abject poverty. Down with globalisation they say, give us death before money!

      Oh, you were talking about Americans? Tough luck, you reap what you sow.

    12. Re:I love this game! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      We outsourced the profit, but kept the jobs, woohoo!

      Oh wait, that's completely stupid!

      .

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    13. Re:I love this game! by snero3 · · Score: 1

      Or has some totally irrational motive, for all we know.

      Having worked for a company (non-indian) trying to sell their product into the USA I can tell you one reason why they might have done it. It is not because of $. To sell in the USA as a foreign company you have to have 1st an office there and 2nd if it is software you are selling you need to have a Local support base or your product just won't sell compared to your local competition.

      --
      It said "windows 98 or better" so I installed Linux
    14. Re:I love this game! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh, it certainly was beneficial for people in India and China. To some degree, because basically they weren't offered those jobs because corporations suddenly realized that we got some responsibility to take because of our colonial times. The jobs were moved there because the workforce there is cheaper. And it's cheaper because the cost of living is lower there. And this in turn is due to people there being simply exploited, having to sell their crops beneath anything that sustains living.

      Hey, we could get the same! Have our farmers sell their wheat for a few cents a ton, get rid of any kind of social security, get rid of healthcare and deal with a few thousand/million dying every year because of it, crime rates that go through the roof and so on.

      The success of a few is bought by thousands. And rest assured, the majority of people in the US aren'T so fond of having their jobs shipped overseas.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Why is this so surprising? by Judg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, why is this such a surprise to everyone? When you going a global economy, it's like opening a flood gate; initially there's a huge rush out (everyone outsources), then some smaller waves back (people demand more insourced jobs), then - well, then it all balances out (US Company A outsources to India, Indian Company B outsources to the US, Mexican company G outsources to the UK, UK Company L outsources to Oz, etc etc).

    In fact, isn't this exactly what everyone was telling us would eventually happen 8 years ago? So shouldn't we have been expecting it?

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:Why is this so surprising? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Of course you are right. In fact, you are too right. Protectionists can no longer remain in denial that its happening, so they try to put a negative spin on it when it does happen. They may be right in one respect--the U.S. can't power over other countries economically--but I'm not interested in an international pissing contest.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    2. Re:Why is this so surprising? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      initially there's a huge rush out (everyone outsources), then some smaller waves back (people demand more insourced jobs), then - well, then it all balances out

      "out" indeed; just like farm work and automobile manufacturing.

    3. Re:Why is this so surprising? by vidarh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It depends on how skilled workers a job demands. Low skilled jobs will always go to the place it's cheapest to have them carried out (other things than just wages play in), and it's a long time before there's any chance of salaries evening out in those type of positions. In IT, however, India is seeing salaries grow at many times the average in the west, and so the cost effectiveness of outsourcing to India is rapidly reducing. Many companies have started looking at China (we have people in China, partly for cost but also partly because China is our second largest market) with the language problems that cause, as well as Russia and Eastern Europe, and even Africa. The problem is that apart from China and Russia, there aren't really any huge untapped resources of people highly educated in IT related skills, and so salaries are starting to rise rapidly in many of these other markets too.

      Indeed, many Indian companies have started outsourcing elsewhere.

      We're still far off from reaching a balance, but India will stop being a threat because of outsourcing within the next 10-20 years, I think, because they are seeing double the pressure on salaries: Their own software industry is growing too, and so unless they do something truly dramatic to increase the workforce in the IT fields, the main downward salary pressure in the west is going to shift to other markets.

      How long it will take to drive up IT salaries in China and Russia is not something I'd want to start guessing at. But I don't exactly fear for my ability to find a job. If you are in low skilled IT jobs, sure, then there's a very good reason to update your skill set.

    4. Re:Why is this so surprising? by krgallagher · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "Seriously, why is this such a surprise to everyone?"

      I am a natve US citizen, Caucasian male. I worked for Wipro recently, and they are a very good company. They paid me competitive rates to what I would get from a US company, and had excellent benefits. Their US home office is in Sunnyvale California about two blocks from Google. If it wasn't for the fact that I was ready to get out of a job that had me living in airports and hotels, I would still be there today.

      Most of what I did was to put an American face on what is basically an Indian company. Any major development was handed off to my counterparts in India where skilled labor is cheaper. I spent an enormous amount of time acting as an interpreter on conference calls for customers who could not understand English with an Indian accent. I also did a lot of requirements gathering because the language barrier made it a painful process for many of our customers. It really was a good job, and if you have the personality that will let you be a good traveling consultant I highly recommended Wipro.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    5. Re:Why is this so surprising? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      India will stop being a threat because of outsourcing within the next 10-20 years

      Meanwhile bills need to paid now. The damage that outsourcing has caused has been terribly managed and that is why it is so resented. It's all very well for academics to sit in their ivory towers and talk shit about things all evening out - people need money now not in some possible future free market utopia.

    6. Re:Why is this so surprising? by renoX · · Score: 1

      >Seriously, why is this such a surprise to everyone?

      Who said it's a surprise?
      I've worked in a project which was originally mostly French and German, then some parts were moved to Romania and China, the Chinese used an Indian IT company which subcontracted some parts to (a few) German engineers.

    7. Re:Why is this so surprising? by bcharr2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but your analysis is all wrong.

      So far there has been no flood of jobs back into the states, or even a trickle for that matter. Nor is there expected to be. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite. The firm in question believes that many American companies still do not trust Indian programming services, and their solution is to open an American office and put an American face on their services. They are looking to build a "brand name", if you will.

      Their stated end goal is to actually see more programming jobs shifted to India. This isn't even a secret. Read the press releases they have made, they lay out their goals for everyone to read. They have no plans to bring jobs back to America, and why should they? They are interested in seeing their home nation do well, and they are positioning themselves extremely well to do just that. One could only wish that American politicians and business leaders felt the same about America.

      If you believe that once India has a lock on these industries that they will not implement protectionist measures to keep the business locked up in their country, then you are far more optimistic than I am. The same with our manufacturing jobs. I'm sorry, but nothing will be "flowing" back to America.

      America is like a vast pool that has shut off its water supply and at the same time sprung a leak. Everyone looks around and sees that there is still plenty of water. No one seems to realize that once our vast monetary reserves are drained the service industry will fold and the "American" Corporations will simply relocate elsewhere.

    8. Re:Why is this so surprising? by kahei · · Score: 4, Informative


      Well, I haven't worked for Wipro. I *have* had them working for *me* and it was an unrepeatable experience -- scared, inexperienced, homesick, basically useless Indian guys supplied on a constantly revolving system, spending about a month on the project and then either disappearing or being rotated somewhere else. The absolutely classic bad side of outsourcing.

      They're probably OK to work *for*, though, if you aren't one of those guys.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    9. Re:Why is this so surprising? by x86processor · · Score: 1

      All big companies in India follow the cattle business. It has become a form of modern slavery, dubbed "IT Slavery". They just hire freshers from college in bulk, and make them billed with customer projects. Only experienced Tech Leads/Project Managers actually work in the project. Yes, Project Managers are made to code in India.

      There is lot of money flowing into the country that people have never seen before, that they have no idea what it is to really do dedicated work from my experience with American hard-working people. It is very easy for people in India to get another job, and they always keep switching jobs, and it is the same shit in every big company. But, customers/clients in the US don't like people moving from their project, but, would like them to stick to their projects.

      All those 'big' US companies who invested, burnt their fingers. Obviously, you don't expect them to tell it out. Nobody goes around proudly saying, 'Hey! I met with an accident!". It will also indirectly affect their business proposals/stake-holders. So, they have just had to keep their mouth shut. They have realized their mistakes now, and are bit more cautious.

    10. Re:Why is this so surprising? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      [India will stop being a threat because of outsourcing within the next 10-20 years] Meanwhile bills need to paid now

      Indeed. In 15 or so years I'll be nearing retirement so that it wouldn't matter. Note that the Indian poor are just starting to get education such that even in India they've yet to tap their full talent pool.

    11. Re:Why is this so surprising? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It is actually going to be 4 years or less.

      Burn rate for info sys has doubled in the last 24 months.

      They've gone from 1/3 of our cost to 2/3 of our cost.

      I read every day about indian experts getting 20%+ annual raises while the indian currency is appreciating at 4% against the dollar.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    12. Re:Why is this so surprising? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      It's not surprising :)

      It's expected.

      The difference between pro-Globalization and anti-Globalization people is that the pro-Globalization people are capable of looking at longer term trends, while the anti people pick up every single news article as an symptom of impending doom.

      Free Trade, Globalization, and all that jazz cause economic changes. Not all of these changes are good; many hurt people. Net, however, we see improvement for all parties concerned, which is exactly what is happening.

      Americans, Indians, Chinese, European; more jobs, more productivity, cheaper goods, better services. Everybody wins as nations specialize in what they are good at. The economic changes that lead to that can be painful.

      It just gives me a giggle to watch the hysterics that surround these tiny macroeconomic changes. Particularly on Slashdot, where _every single_ economic article is full of posts describing impending economic doom where the dollar collapses, destroying every portion of the world economy, nuclear war happens, and we starve to death.

      History tends to trend up (or at least it has so far). Most of mankind tends to give a shit about the rest of it. Eliminating borders and opening up trade is good for everybody, because it allows us all to share our technology and resources.

      Anything else is stupid.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  7. Hardly. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 0, Troll


    You can bet your paycheck they will be looking to hire a gaggle of H1-Bs they've already selected back home.

    This ploy is not new.

    1. Re:Hardly. by posterlogo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hardly. Do you have any idea how hard it is nowadays for companies to apply for H1-Bs for workers? Given how limited the number of H1-Bs are every year, there is actually stiff competition for qualified workers. Considering the firm is planning to open up 500 jobs in the coming years it is impossible for more than a small fraction of these to be filled with H1-Bs, I seriously doubt your "ploy" is what this is all about. (Also consider that ONLY ~25% of H1-Bs are for Indians, whereas they actually have one of the largest pools of qualified applicants).


      Moreover, you seem to think this is automatically bad. As a generally benign tax-paying and extremely low crime population, I hardly think Atlanta will suffer from inclusion of these H1-Bs.

      RTFA, and consider using better language next time -- "gaggle", "ploy" -- just smacks of a snooty, condescending attitude.

    2. Re:Hardly. by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      and consider using better language next time -- "gaggle", "ploy" -- just smacks of a snooty, condescending attitude.
      As opposed to telling someone on the internet to use better language? Oh, the irony!

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    3. Re:Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humm... And why a capitalistic company, not run by the State would do that? Is capitalism different in India? Do capitalists there will willingly increase their costs just to give a job on the US for some of their fellow contrymen?

    4. Re:Hardly. by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      Actually, from the audio from the NPR story, Wipro stated that they will hire American employees because they have specialized knowledge to currents and trends in American markets. Also, because US programmers are typically better than other national counterparts! Although, this could be PR BS....

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
    5. Re:Hardly. by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Probably not true. They're going to farm the local degree mills for warm bodies who can throw code together.

    6. Re:Hardly. by univgeek · · Score: 1

      It's called the L1 visa - intra-company transfer.

      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
  8. Here we go again by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another story about outsourcing to 3rd world countries!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Here we go again by monkville · · Score: 0

      Hide!! Hide!!! Dont let the political correctness police get you. Nowadays, they call it Developing!!!!

    2. Re:Here we go again by Colin+Smith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You missed the irony. The country being outsourced to is the US of A in this case. But that's ok. I'll assume you're American.

      --
      Deleted
    3. Re:Here we go again by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Another story about outsourcing to 3rd world countries!"

      Funnier than you know!
      Remember those clothing mills that are disappearing from the South due to outsourcing?
      They were originally up Nawth in places like New Jersey before they were outsourced to the "backward" South. :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  9. Re:Theories vs Facts by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its just a THEORY... just like EVOLUTION and GRAVITY

    Market theory is well tested and proven...

  10. Large pools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds a bit weird "Large pool of qualified applicants in the market today". What large pools, there is a shortage of qualified applicants in the IT industry as a whole, or is this just in issulated areas of the world? In Denmark at least there is a HUGE shortage of qualified people, especially if your a softare developer.

    1. Re:Large pools? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      There is always going to be a shortage in QUALIFIED applicants no matter what field. That is true for IT, Engineering, Managing, Science, ... People (and business) want something for their money, most salaries are set anyway and the good applicants can get a little more so you might as well hire good people.

      I know out of experience, having worked as a contractor and now full-time that there is always a new technology somewhere that somebody wants to implement and nobody has 5 years experience with the 2007 product, so they hire people that have proven their best in the past in similar situations, people that can adapt, people that know the basics and how to think their way out of a situation, those are also the ones that gets sucked up first and paid the most.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  11. /. must outsource editorial positions to India by jkrise · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Similarly, salaries of IT professionals world-wide are projected to stagnant or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today."

    Stagnate, not stagnant.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:/. must outsource editorial positions to India by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I've taken to tagging these with (for this example) "typo !stagnant stagnate". Though maybe "typostagnate!stagnant" might be better if internal bangs were not rejected if prefix matched "typo".

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  12. Americans are very expensive by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a LOT of bureaucracy to comply with, and a lot of countries are now offering simplified corporate taxes and regulations to boost interest in their economies. Eastern Europe is a very good example. Not only have many of those countries adopted flat corporate taxes, which cut down on the cost of compliance, and the rates are pretty low and getting lower. The last I heard, the total cost of compliance with our income tax, personal and corporate, is about $286B a year in lost productivity, added bureaucracy, etc. It's ironic, but ending the variable-rate (I'm loathe to call such a stupid system "progressive") income tax in the United States alone, and replacing it with a very simple flat tax would constitute a sweeping tax cut just in terms of the resources freed up from the bullshit compliance efforts.

    It doesn't help too that many Americans view things like health care as their God-given right. Many people don't want to even pay for their own health care. They foist those costs onto their employers, and the result is that we have an auto industry that is collapsing because it has to cut corners on the quality of its cars to price them at the same rate that Japanese companies, which don't lavish effectively unlimited health care coverage, onto their employees. GM, for example, has about $1,500/car in expenses just for health care that it has to pay for its union workers, many of whom haven't gotten the memo: most corporate employees don't get these benefits, why should they?

    Deregulation, a simplified tax code and making people pay their own way are the only things that will make America able to compete with these leaner, cheaper countries.

    1. Re:Americans are very expensive by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The last I heard, the total cost of compliance with our income tax, personal and corporate, is about $286B a year in lost productivity, added bureaucracy, etc. It's ironic, but ending the variable-rate (I'm loathe to call such a stupid system "progressive") income tax in the United States alone, and replacing it with a very simple flat tax would constitute a sweeping tax cut just in terms of the resources freed up from the bullshit compliance efforts.

      I certainly wouldn't disagree with this, but I'd like to know if you've been, uh, shall we say "smoking something" since you seem to imply that such cost savings would go towards creating more jobs in the USA. My experience has been that the more money companies save, the more of it that goes into the pockets of upper executives.

      It doesn't help too that many Americans view things like health care as their God-given right. Many people don't want to even pay for their own health care. They foist those costs onto their employers, and the result is that we have an auto industry that is collapsing because it has to cut corners on the quality of its cars to price them at the same rate that Japanese companies, which don't lavish effectively unlimited health care coverage, onto their employees. GM, for example, has about $1,500/car in expenses just for health care that it has to pay for its union workers, many of whom haven't gotten the memo: most corporate employees don't get these benefits, why should they?

      Now your post veers into the irrational. You take the single most extreme example you can of a totally atypical industry and act like it's typical. Yes, we know that the American automobile industry is on a path of self-destruction thanks the autoworkers union. Why pull this extreme example out and go on about it when you even admit "most corporate employees don't get these benefits"? Indeed. Everyone I know has to pay something for their own health care, even if some of the cost is paid by their employer. In fact, the cost me and my co-workers pay goes up every year.

      Deregulation, a simplified tax code and making people pay their own way are the only things that will make America able to compete with these leaner, cheaper countries.

      Not only am I skeptical that this will work (deregulation doesn't solve every problem, it sometimes leads to worse situations - have you forgotten the California energy deregulation debacle of a few years ago?), again, my experience has been that the more money American companies save, the more money that goes to the upper executives. I would not expect such a plan to result in more jobs. In fact, it might actually result in less because the executives would have even more money to keep to themselves.
      Never underestimate the greed of business executives or their ability to safeguard or even increase their own perks.

    2. Re:Americans are very expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess someone should tell the Japanese that their national health insurance is hindering their competitiveness with the U.S. auto industry. Er, no, it isn't. Well then the German national health care system is why German cars are so poor...

      No, wait, I have it. The U.S. auto industry is inefficient because its compensation for its executives is ridiculously high, and because it specialized in automobiles that fewer people want now that fuel is USD3/gallon and Americans accept that global warming is real.

      Good luck find a country that produces a successful automotive industry that doesn't have a national health care system.

    3. Re:Americans are very expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try pushing your agenda, bub.

      It doesn't help too that many Americans view things like health care as their God-given right.

      Tax-payer money funds health care research. I don't need any God to give me the right to the benefits. I fucking paid for it in the first place!

    4. Re:Americans are very expensive by ArticulateArne · · Score: 1

      This is almost insightful, save one thing:

      The executives, when they make money, don't take the cash home and stuff it under their mattresses. They invest it, re-injecting the money into the economy in hopes of making more. Should they make the amount they make? I don't know, I'll leave that for another discussion. But you can't say that money is lost.

    5. Re:Americans are very expensive by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      You don't have to give any of the tax cut benefits to the corporate side of things. Even though it would reduce the burden on their end you can just give it all back to the people. If the nearly $300B figure is correct, that's an average savings of $1,000 per American citizen, not because taxes were reduced, but because overhead costs and beaurocratic waste were reduced. That's $1,000 extra that people can spend however they want to do spend it. At least this way it takes a little longer before it all accumulates in one person's pocket.

    6. Re:Americans are very expensive by king-manic · · Score: 1

      (deregulation doesn't solve every problem, it sometimes leads to worse situations - have you forgotten the California energy deregulation debacle of a few years ago?)

      Sometimes? Almost always, from rampant price gouging int he natural gas deregulation market to massive telecoms quality cutting etc.. It's harder to find a success story then a horror story. Not just because horror stories make better stories but also because success is much rarer when the deregulation often happens with the big guy paying off the powers that be to deregulate in a certain way. The mythical "deregulation done right." is almost non existent because yoru dealing with human systems not automated systems. There will always be human factors to account for which makes blind ideological argument irrelevant.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    7. Re:Americans are very expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do not put the money into OUR system. They buy a Lexus, buy a villa in the Rivera, buy a Rolex, etc.

    8. Re:Americans are very expensive by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help too that many Americans view things like health care as their God-given right.

      So, basically, what you're saying is that too many Americans believe in God?

    9. Re:Americans are very expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if employees have to pay 100% of their health insurance, the companies will have to pay them higher salaries so that they can afford it. It's how the market works.

  13. Dilbert comic strip? by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasn't there a Dilbert comic strip where Dilbert's company outsources to X who outsources to Y who outsources to .... who outsources to Dilbert's company.

    And everyone lies a bit about meeting the SLAs and so quotes cheaper prices. ;)

    --
    1. Re:Dilbert comic strip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And everyone has a share.

  14. Yeah, but what about quality? by ebunga · · Score: 1

    The fact that software development is often outsourced, off-shored, and then off-shored again should make it quite clear that the work quality of the average developer is about the same as cheap commodity coffee beans.

    1. Re:Yeah, but what about quality? by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      The fact that software development is often outsourced, off-shored, and then off-shored again should make it quite clear that the work quality of the average developer is about the same as cheap commodity coffee beans. I guess you've noticed that the expensive fair-trade, organic, shade-grown coffee tastes incredibly good. Sometimes you DO get what you pay for.
  15. from the turnabout-is-fair-play dept. by goldaryn · · Score: 1

    Heh. I once worked on servicedesk for a well known gases company, with global IT operating out of the UK. The servicedesk was exported to India.

    A few months later I noticed in the news that the Indian firm to which the servicedesk had been outsourced had purchased a call-centre in Northern Ireland. My guess is the Geordie, Scottish, Worzel Gummidge, Scouse accents were too confusing. Oh, to listen in to some of those conversations...

    Apparently that company has since brought IT back to the UK. The price of trying to save a few pennies...

    1. Re:from the turnabout-is-fair-play dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a well known gases company...

      Microsoft?

  16. So does this mean... by SkinnyKid63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does this mean that when Indians call for tech supported, they will get angry because they can't understand the American accent of someone claiming to be Raehan?

    1. Re:So does this mean... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      So does this mean that when Indians call for tech supported, they will get angry because they can't understand the American accent of someone claiming to be Raehan?

      "I recon therza varmit wedged up right in yer fan, that spinny thingamabob thats humin' like a lassy bittin' by a thirsty ol' swamp skeeter".

    2. Re:So does this mean... by jagdish · · Score: 1

      Where are you from?

  17. Misleading summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Similarly, salaries of IT professionals world-wide are projected to stagnant or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today."

    TFA only mentions the Indian tech industry. I'm sure you could make a case for a world-wide effect from this, but the article doesn't mention it.

    1. Re:Misleading summary by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      In my 15 years of professional experience, I have yet to witness an oversupply of competent technicians.

      We won't have that until we have an oversupply of competent people.  Don't hold your breath.

  18. OMG! The developing world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is developing!

    Something must be done!

    1. Re:OMG! The developing world... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      ...is developing! Something must be done!

      It is a myth you have to be export-heavy to grow an economy. It became fashionable because the US bent over and took it and so everyone wants to give it to us now. Stimulate local consumption and free up small businesses if you want to grow a new economy without relying on exporting. Asia is afraid of consumption. We don't use our buying power to get a better deal from them.

  19. Or, as Scott Adams has put it.... by DrYak · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dilbert is just visionnary :
    • strip 1 (and here is some text to feed the spam filter)
    • strip 2 (again some text to please the spam detector)
    • strip 3 (sorry SlashCode : this isn't ads for viagra, these are actual dilbert strips)


    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Or, as Scott Adams has put it.... by thebear05 · · Score: 1

      or you could actually use the space to title the individual strips

  20. large pool of qualified applicants in the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As an employer, I have to say that this is total BS. If there was a large pool of qualified applicants, we'd have a larger workforce.
    The reality is that the market for IT talent with actual talent (as opposed to fluffed up CVs) is VERY tight, at least across
    North America.

    Outsourcing is not all that cost effective, due to miscommunication leading to wasted effort, weird working hours, telco and travel costs, etc. Organizations outsource because they can't find local talent, and apparently talent is getting pretty short in places like India too - meaning that we're still stuck.

  21. We'll See What Really Happens by tshak · · Score: 3, Informative

    This recent article discusses an interesting paradox India is in: It will have high unemployment among the educated, but only because those educated are not skilled enough to perform the required jobs (including, but not limited to, IT). The point is that India will not be able to come close to meeting the demand of an estimated workforce shortage of 40 million by 2012.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  22. Qualified applicants? by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

    Similarly, salaries of IT professionals world-wide are projected to stagnant or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today.


    If by qualified, you mean "willing to undercut someone who can get the job done right", then sure. The fact remains that some companies will understand that to get the job done right will cost a fair salary.

    Lots of people play football, too... but not everybody makes it to the NFL.
    --
    "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
  23. Which way is that pool exactly? by cyngus · · Score: 1

    Can you show me exactly where this pool of "qualified" applicants is? My company is desperate to hire quality people. Despite extensive pre-screening, I'd say no more than 20% (and that's optimistic) of people who make it to an in-person interview are nearly qualified. Maybe 10% I'm impressed with.

    Knowing how to write C/C++/Java or anything else is not sufficient to be "qualified". In fact, I'd sooner hire someone who was bright, creative, well-versed in computer *science*, and doesn't know a compiled language from an interpreted one than hire a wizard at Java who can't think (him|her)self out of a paper bag.

    1. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      If only there were some sort of online forum where dedicated geeks hung out. Then it would be easy to find people!

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by cyngus · · Score: 1

      That doesn't help if the geeks are already employed!

    3. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess that another 10% out of the subset that you weren't impressed with do not do that well in an interview setting and possibly are not adept at pulling syntactic minutia out of the air but otherwise are more talented than the 10% you were impressed with.

    4. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because someone is employed doesn't mean they aren't available. It just means you have to offer them something their current position isn't/can't. I'm employed and also looking for work. As many people have found, the best time to find a job is when you're already employed.

    5. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you show me exactly where this pool of "qualified" applicants is? My company is desperate to hire quality people. Despite extensive pre-screening, I'd say no more than 20% (and that's optimistic) of people who make it to an in-person interview are nearly qualified. Maybe 10% I'm impressed with.
      Let me ask you this: What is the salary range you're looking to pay? I think the answer to this question will determine where the qualified applicants are.
    6. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by cyngus · · Score: 1

      If I didn't make it clear from my original post, I could care less about syntactic minutia. In fact, I've never asked a syntax question. I've never asked a question that required more than psuedo code or got more specific than programming concepts that are found across many languages. I care much more about the ability to think than anything else. A good answer to "How would you design the object memory layout for a language like Java?" is much more important than "What are some examples of ternary logic operators?" Most interviews I conduct, less than 50% of the time is spent on questions related to computers. The "doesn't interview well" question comes up a lot and I and many other interviewers take this into account if the candidate seems nervous.

    7. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      You're probably right, but how is the interviewer supposed to know if you're a smart guy with poor interview skills or just plain dumb?

    8. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've interviewed with bums that sound like you before. You're looking for someone with 5+ years of experience that will work for the same wage as a beginner with no experience. Good luck finding a taker.

    9. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, I'd sooner hire someone who was bright, creative, well-versed in computer *science*. . .

      That's amusing to me, because during the dotcom boom, my grant funding dried up, so I decided to look for a tech job. No one would give me the time of day, inspite of a masters degree in CS and over a decade of planning and programming under strict timelines (field projects can't be delayed). The only person to talk to me on the phone said, "We don't hire people like you to program." WTF?

      Sadly, there's no way on my resume to separate myself from those easily trapped in wet paper bags, so I'm always removed in any "extensive pre-screening".

    10. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by wiggles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The situation you speak of is the tendency of employers to only hire people with the exact skill set they're looking for. Much of the time, the people with those skills just don't exist. The solution is not to reject all applicants, but to hire someone who, though they may not possess the specific skills the employer needs, can come up to speed on the relevant technology.

      The problem is also one of education. Employers are looking for Java programmers with experience in J2EE, SOAP, XML, SOA, OMGWTFBBQ, and whatever other acronyms du jour they're working with. Universities teach data structures, systems design, and object oriented programming. Obviously, there is a *huge* disconnect between what employers want and what universities produce. In order to solve this (un)employment dilemma, somebody's got to give. Either universities are going to have to start teaching students how to code to a specific standard instead of general concepts, or employers are going to have to pay to train new employees to do the specific jobs they need instead of expecting to find a rhombus shaped peg in a job market full of round ones.

    11. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That, and the working environment. I've just finished my PhD, have a book (in an unrelated area) coming out in a few months, and am enjoying having time to work on some open source projects while supporting myself by working as a freelance writer. If someone offered me an interesting job then I'd consider it, but at the moment I don't have any financial pressure to get one. A decent salary is a tick in the box, since money seems to be the way you assess your worth to your employer, but an interesting location, interesting project, and good working environment are more important.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This geek is currently employed... as an oriental rug salesman. Apparently my skills in -retail sales- is more valuable than my ability to write code in C, Objective-C, Java, AppleScript, Javascript, Flash Actionscript, and a touch of shell scripting and SQL. I'm also a completely competent Macintosh troubleshooter/server adminstrator and I'm busy teaching myself C++ in my spare time. In addition, I'm quite adept with a number of specific apps... Photoshop, Illustrator, Office, that sort of thing. I'm an amateur geek. I really like computers. Sadly, nobody in the southeastern US wants to pay more $45K/yr for these skills without "experience." Even with experience, it isn't much better. As a rug salesman working less than 40 hours a week, I easily make more than that. Retail sales requires no specific skill or training AT ALL. There is no degree in sales to be earned. You just apply and if you don't smell really bad or something, you're hired!

      If you can't pay more than a retail job that requires no experience of any kind... well, I'm confident that there is no lack of skills. It's simple unwillingness to pay what the market will bear on our own shores. You guys sent all the jobs to India, because people there will work for peanuts. Sorry, but I think I'll stick with my 35 hrs/wk, 4 wks/yr paid vacation, and almost $50K/yr salary. Anyone could get my job. It requires two days of training at best. Who do you think is stupid enough to work twice as hard for less money, even if they already have the skills required?

    13. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by cyngus · · Score: 1

      I don't really see the education disconnect. If you learn data structure, systems design, and OOP, the acronyms are unimportant. If you're bright and company X won't hire you because you know acronym Y instead of comparable acronym Z, you don't want to work for them anyway. I've yet to meet any language or protocol that anyone worth hiring couldn't pick up in a matter of a few weeks.

    14. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by mh1997 · · Score: 1

      If only there were some sort of online forum where dedicated geeks hung out. Then it would be easy to find people!
      Too bad that if such a place did exist, their skills would not be as extensive as their egos.
    15. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      How are you getting your leads on candidates (recruiter, job sites, postings on your own web site, all of the above)?

      --
      Software Inventor
    16. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      "If you're bright and company X won't hire you because you know acronym Y instead of comparable acronym Z, you don't want to work for them anyway." - unfortunately this is the way a majority of companies operate these days and bright people, still being people, have limited time and bills to pay, making it unlikely that they will be able to narrow the field of potential employers down from thousands of companies to just those that actually are really great places to work (rather then merely claiming to be so) and be financially able to wait for a position to open up at one of those companies.

      --
      Software Inventor
    17. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Took me months to find the last guy we hired. We finally started posting on the job board at the local college and found a bright kid fresh out of school. He didn't know the exact skills we were looking for, but was smart and motivated.

    18. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Retric · · Score: 1

      I think your idea of "qualified" might be extreme.

      "How would you design the object memory layout for a language like Java?"

      If your looking for something like: <ChildClass> = {ClassID,Size,<BaseClass(ClassID,Size,Data),<Child >(ClassID,Size,Data)} with some boxes on the whiteboard but it's one of those questions you could easily spend weeks optimizing depending on the OS your using and how the rest of the VM is written.  After all you only really need the class ID, Data, and a look up table but having some debugging data inside the classes could be vary useful...

      IMO a more reasonable question is you are handed some functional but slow code that takes way to long how you go about speeding it up.  You then keep some notes on what's wrong and answer some questions until they work out what's up. Be it thrashing a DB or allocating memory inside a tight loop these types of problems show a lot about how people think vs. what they know.

    19. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      A good answer to "How would you design the object memory layout for a language like Java?" is much more important than "What are some examples of ternary logic operators?" Sounds like an interesting interview question. Are you still hiring? If so, drop me an email.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    20. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by technomom · · Score: 1

      J2EE - check
      SOAP - check
      XML - check
      SOA - check
      OMGWTFBBQ - (splashes lots of lighter fluid on the coals in the backyard, pulls out the butane lighter, flick, flick....more lighter fluid..flick, flick, WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!) - check

      Am I hired yet?

    21. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by technomom · · Score: 1

      Not sure that the smart guy with poor interview skills is always better.

      Poor interview skills might be a red flag that the smart guy might be too gunshy to ask questions in an effort to get smarter. The dumb guy might be dumb about the one topic you've broached, but might ask an intelligent question back in an effort to forge an answer. In that case, I might prefer the dumb one. Of course if he's basically dumber than paint, well.......we can always use another usability tester! :-)

      In any event, I say I'd rather have a person who can quickly obtain "just in time" intelligence because they have some social and research skills that makes them a quick study. That person is usually much more valuable in the long run.

    22. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is your criteria, wording of ads and the wrong HR managers who don't know better... There are lot of capable people out there, just that you are screening it wrong.

      I LOL at ads that need experience in a particular schematic capture tool. When we switched to a completely new schematic tool at work, it was like 2 days of training (if we were lucky) and we were already up churning 60+ pages of designs. Somehow the HR managers can't grasp the concept that hiring engineering != office worker. We are engineers because we know how to do design not how to use a PC office package. If we have to do it in crayons on napkins, we can still do 90+% of our job. The drafting people used to take out designs like that until we took away their job.

      Round up 10 (or 20-30) applicants, let they write an exam for 3 hours with real life design. Let them have laptops with internet connection. Hire the person that solve the problem in the lest amount time and use least amount of resource. If the person cheats using google for open source package, he should deserve the job plus a sign-on bonus for being smart.

    23. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by ChrisWong · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is not one of acronym compliance. The pool of applicants is simply very shallow. It's hard to find *available* candidates who can demonstrate basic technical ability. People who interview for an engineering position with a 6 figure salary crash and burn when asked to reverse a linked list (it's not a critical question, but I've stopped asking that one). Very few seem to know their data structures and their performance characteristics. I'm talking about undergraduate data structures and algo stuff: arrays vs linked list, trees vs hash tables, big O notation. The heck with the acronyms.

      It's not that there aren't good engineers. I meet lots at geek events. But they aren't looking. They are well compensated, or they have their own business, or are just plain satisfied. When we interview someone we like, they often accept another offer before we even bring them in for a second interview, let alone start waving money at them. We found the last two hires out of state.

      So as the original reply said, please point me at that pool. It's a desert out here.

    24. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by solipsist0x01 · · Score: 1

      I don't know any Java wizards that can't think their way out of a paper bag!

    25. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by cyngus · · Score: 1

      "it's one of those questions you could easily spend weeks optimizing depending on the OS your using and how the rest of the VM is written."

      The optimization is not relevant. The question is meant to probe whether the candidate has an understanding of what an object really is. The logical picture of how a program moves about memory. The basic answer is not that hard, but few people stop and think about it, and shockingly few actually can answer it, even basically.

      "IMO a more reasonable question is you are handed some functional but slow code that takes way to long how you go about speeding it up."

      Maybe, optimizations can be interesting, I find more often the answer to optimization questions that are answerable in an interview fall into one of two categories:
      (1) - They fall into a set of no-no's (like memory allocation in a tight loop)
      (2) - They rely on knowing some "trick" or "quirk" of a given language/platform.
      The harder and more interesting optimization questions often in involve analysis of multiple systems/programs that are interacting in an unexpected way. These are not really answerable in an interview.

    26. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      People who interview for an engineering position with a 6 figure salary crash and burn when asked to reverse a linked list (it's not a critical question, but I've stopped asking that one). Very few seem to know their data structures and their performance characteristics. I'm talking about undergraduate data structures and algo stuff: arrays vs linked list, trees vs hash tables, big O notation.

      That's because rolling your own basic data structures and algorithms is generally frowned upon when there are existing implementations in a standard library. As result of using standard implementations and not regularly dealing with these basics for years on end people forget a lot of the details. This has happened to me and I found it necessary to spend a week reviewing some college text books in order to interview well, and then it was back to using standard implementations again, and forgetting the details of basic data structures and algorithms.

      This is again an issue of wanting specific knowledge. Do you really need someone who remembers the details of basic data structures and algorithms off the top of their head, or do you need some one who knows how to find and learn whatever is necessary to get the job done? Asking about the former won't tell you about the later.

      --
      Software Inventor
    27. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Stradivarius · · Score: 1

      I disagree that knowledge of data structure performance characteristics is "specific knowledge". It's fundamentals. You'll need that knowledge for just about any performance-sensitive application. Heck, even if the application isn't that performance sensitive, you should be using an appropriate data structure, especially if you have a standard library implementation that's made it easy to do.

      I wouldn't expect someone to reinvent the standard library in an interview. But I *would* expect they can give a logical explanation for which of the standard library data structures they would select for a given problem. An array, a list, a tree, a hash table? Not all are suitable for all problems. If someone can't explain to me why using a linked list to store 2 gazillion elements of data that need speedy random access is a bad idea... that's not good. This kind of consideration comes up all the time in real world programming scenarios.

    28. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      Knowing which operations a data structure is particularly good or bad at is one thing, but expecting folks to remember the big O notation for all of the operations on all of the basic data structures is specific knowledge that can be quite easily looked up when necessary. For small data sets the big O isn't going to matter, and the specific implementation will actually need to be examined; however, for most uses of small data sets the perf really doesn't matter and code simplicity is governs the choice of the standard implementation to use (i.e the one that requires the least code to actually make use of).

      --
      Software Inventor
    29. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by Xenogyst · · Score: 1

      In fact, I'd sooner hire someone who was bright, creative, well-versed in computer *science*, and doesn't know a compiled language from an interpreted one than hire a wizard at Java who can't think (him|her)self out of a paper bag.

      Of course, such a person would never be considered for an interview due to lack of wizard credentials.

    30. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by tppublic · · Score: 1
      You know what I think happened? We left IT.

      The problem I've experienced in IT is the problem of information asymmetry, exactly the problem in The Market for Lemons. I know what I'm worth as part of an IT position, but employers are generally hiring and paying based on the assumption that (or the need for) a lemon... because that's how the economic "game" plays out. If you have become an "expert mechanic" in hiring IT people, then I have great respect for you.

      I would note the asymmetry runs the other way as well. For example, I got really sick of trying to find a good IT employer. Repeated interviews get old, burn vacation, and it's time and energy I could spend elsewhere. I haven't found a reliable list of "good" IT employers so I can constrain the interview list enough to make the process worthwhile.

      Hence, I don't play the game. I get better pay, similar hours, and more visibility in a sales role. It has its own pains and challenges, and I certainly wouldn't mind going back to the IT world, but I won't do it at the rate the IT has demonstrated it will pay (and with the treatment usually given to the IT team)

    31. Re:Which way is that pool exactly? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Dude, put up what you're looking for and some way to contact you. If all of Slashdot is employed, I'll go buy a hat and then eat it.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  24. It's not WHERE you outsource to by blueZ3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's communication with co-workers and the difficulties that come integrating remote teams.

    My brother-in-law is a developer for a big fininacial services operation, and they attempted to outsource a project. Eventually management gave up and brought the work back to the home office, as the quality of code coming out of the outsourcing house was crap. Basically, a lot of the code they sent back was buggy or hard to integrate and had to be debugged and redone by the on-site developers.

    But I'm not sure that that's an indication that the coders were poor (though that's a possibility). Basically, you're asking folks to communicate across both a language barrier and time difference that just makes it really difficult to do so with good results. Not impossible, perhaps, but difficult. Considering the difficulties that folk speaking the same primary language and sitting in the same room have communicating, I think it's safe to say very difficult.

    Moving your "onshore outsourcing" to Georgia or wherever might address language issues, but the problems that come with integrating a remote team aren't going to go away.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:It's not WHERE you outsource to by MidKnight · · Score: 1

      I wholly agree with your point here. I'm currently working as a technical team lead for a company in Los Angeles. The other 5 developers on the project are in Russia, 12 timezones away. Most of their English skills are decent enough, but the sheer distance makes working with them extremely difficult.

      Our current arrangement came together because the remote developers' work on the previous project was of poor quality. They were doing the technical oversight themselves, and reporting status on a weekly basis. We never heard of any development challenges, or any of their solutions... just "We'll be done in 3 weeks" sort of status.

      Needless to say, the result of the remote development was bad code. The application is extremely buggy, does not scale well, and would be very difficult to maintain. Surprise! So, what was the solution? Well, use the same remote developers to re-implement things, but this time make sure one of the local developers (that's me!) talks to them every day. We're a few weeks into what will probably be a 4 month project, and I'm having my doubts.

      If my remote team were "less" remote, like in Atlanta instead of Russia, I think the situation would be very manageable. Integrating a remote team is a solvable problem. Integrating a remote team that is a half-world away and does not speak the language natively makes a difficult problem almost impossible.

    2. Re:It's not WHERE you outsource to by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      Have you heard anyone from the deep south talk? I think I'd rather outsource to India!

      (I kid, I kid!)

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  25. Good! by homer_s · · Score: 1

    Similarly, salaries of IT professionals world-wide are projected to stagnant or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today.

    Similarly, the price of computer hardware world-wide are projected to stagnate or possibly fall due to improvements in technology and an increase in the number of manufacturers. We all know that cannot be good for the industry.

    When the cost of any product (or service) falls, more people/companies can use that product due to the reduced cost and produce more/better stuff for the end consumer - this is true for microchips, shoes, tools, janitors or programming services.

    Yeah, it sucks if you are the producer of the product whose price falls, but the consumers of your product or service do not have to support you. It does not matter if the price falls because of technology or because of cheap "foreign" imports - either way the consumer has more money in the pocket now to create other, new stuff (either by himself or by investing).

  26. Depends on what you call qualified. by mrjb · · Score: 1

    Over 90% of the IT coworkers I've had in the past 10 years of my IT career had NO education in IT whatsoever. I'm also sorry to report that it reflects in the quality of their work.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:Depends on what you call qualified. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please... IT training does not an expert make! Last I saw the paper-cert-chasers had flooded the IT labor market with their certifications in everything and no talent, ability, comprehension bodies were just cluttering up the place. I know many of those bums have fallen off, but many still cling to their jobs somehow. They have "training" as evidenced by the testing for which they gained certifications. To be short, I see the problem as being the other-way around. The real lack is in people who have the talent, ability and cognitive skills to be a good person in IT.

    2. Re:Depends on what you call qualified. by WwWonka · · Score: 1

      Over 90% of the IT coworkers I've had in the past 10 years of my IT career had NO education in IT whatsoever. I'm also sorry to report that it reflects in the quality of their work.

      I don't know if that is you Chris on the other side of my cube, but that 90% of us here at ZippoTech find 100% of you to be an arrogant prick.

    3. Re:Depends on what you call qualified. by jerryodom · · Score: 1

      Completely agree with you on that one. I'm often shocked what percentage of the corporate IT people not only lack education but just a general interest in learning anything new.(let alone how to develop) They're like circus monkeys that've been taught how to perform a handful of basic tasks and anything new requires a 12 person meeting where the few actual IT people provide answers.

      --
      For some reason I refuse to use either spell check or the spacebar properly.
  27. let's start a union by lib3rtarian · · Score: 1

    I, for one, will not work for less than a certain sum. I'll go back to cooking before I do I.T. style work for less money.

    1. Re:let's start a union by phedre · · Score: 1

      I'm going into waitressing myself, so I'll see you at work next week. You know, at the restaurant.

    2. Re:let's start a union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out http://www.washtech.org/ Technically it's a Washington State based union but you don't have to live in Washington State to join.

    3. Re:let's start a union by lib3rtarian · · Score: 1

      I have 2 thoughts on this.
      1) Waitressing and not waitering leads me to believe you are a woman. I guess I'm just surprised to find an actual women on slashdot. I mean this to be sort of funny and ironic, not sexist or trollish. Sorry if I offend you (or anyone).
      2) My previous experience working with Penguins (what cooks call waiters and waitresses) is that they lie, and do anything they can to cover their own asses and maximize tips, no matter how bad it makes the cooks and the restaurant look. So, if you really do go into waitressing, please, do me a favor, and be nice to the cooks.

  28. Don't you mean... by Trespass · · Score: 1

    BIZARRO outsourcing?

  29. The problem with healthcare in the US by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    is that it is incredibly expensive to begin with. A week in a hospital can cost as much as 100k$. The result is "drive-through" surgery. WTF?

    Also, if I have an insurance policy that the hospital accepts, the cost of a procedure is X$. If I don't have insurance, it'x 2X or even 3X$. Again, WTF?

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:The problem with healthcare in the US by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      Two words explain both these phenomena:

      Insurance

      Liability

      Liability causes high cost to entry to healthcare, so there is not sufficient increase in supply to bring prices down. Insurance allows costs to remain high because it distributes a cost of services used by a small fraction of the population across the entire population - this means the actual demand of the service is no longer related to its price, so traditional economics don't hold very well. What you end up with is a twisted relationship between people who pay insurance but don't get services, people who pay insurance and get services, and people who don't pay insurance but get services. People who don't pay insurance and don't get services are not exempt from the complication: there are always incidental effects related to the benefits to society to having health care for everyone. Also, even if you or your employer is not directly paying for insurance, if you (or your employer) purchase any product or service out there you are still paying for insurance in the form of higher prices for those goods and services (unless you live in a completely closed community like in The Village or something).

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    2. Re:The problem with healthcare in the US by seebs · · Score: 1

      That's not always what I've seen -- when my father's hearing aid turned out not to be covered by insurance, the same exact device suddenly cost 1/10th as much.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    3. Re:The problem with healthcare in the US by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      My mother works in the medical field, and from what I've heard from her your situation is closer to reality than the GP. If a procedure or treatment is gonna be covered by insurance anyways, then the doctor/hospital is going to bill the absolute most they can. If they know that it isn't covered and hence isn't "free money" then they set a more realistic fee schedule that they think can be paid by the patient. Better to get $3000 from a patient who considers that a fair price than to bill him $25000 and have him say "Screw that!" and toss the bill in the trash.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:The problem with healthcare in the US by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Just as an aside, when in college, I worked for the college doing IT work. One day I slipped/fell down the stairs at work (had been raining outside and there was a lot of water that had been tracked in onto the steps that I didn't know about). Broke my leg in 4 places, but thankfully since I was at work, workers comp paid my medical bills. Don't know how much the fact that it was "paid for" affected it, but my 3 day hospital stay (included corrective surgery on my leg) totaled over $80k. There's no reason why 3 days of medical care should cost what for some people is 2-3 YEARS worth of wages.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  30. everything changes and people never get used by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    Hey if somebody else is knocking at your country's door and catering better to business (as far as business is concerned) then more power to you. The rest of us will have to learn to adapt to a changing world, choose to die, or die trying. Everybody is adverse to change, but it's often not such a big deal if you embrace it -- only then will you be able to see the opportunies when you learn to work with it instead of fearing it.

  31. Are we a 3rd world nation yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know our [US] economy has been sliding badly... the gap between the haves and the have-nots has been ever-widening and the middle class is moving to extinction... but I didn't know it had progressed so far along that we are being treated like a nation of "brown people." How long before I am chastised for having an American accent when I speak on the phone?

  32. Not what you expect. by king-manic · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are a lot of cautionary tales about outsourcing and often the infrastructure necessary to successfully out source over seas almost negates the cost benefit. You need good bilingual managers, well thought out specifications, a good out sourcing firm or subsidiary, rigorous hiring practices and a "friend" in the over seas government to protect you investment. It's worth it if you need extra capacity with more flexibility (as over seas hiring/firing can be easier). From personal experience hiring an over seas firm does not guarantee any cost savings and if your only looking to shave your costs you may find out like my previous company that out sourcing can be a multi hundreds of million dollar catastrophe.

    I've been part of small companies that hired a over seas company to to find out they paid a retainer for almost nothing. I've been part of a large company that spend a couple hundred million and got back a unusable piece of trash. The company was Isreali. Many heads rolled.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  33. You missed one... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    US companies outsoucing jobs to Indian who THEN outsource back to the US ==> Bone-headed AND bad for the US

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:You missed one... by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      At least Wall Street will be happy. Outsource to India: good for the bottom line, no matter how the deal is structured. You know Wall Street? Richest people on the block, how could they be wrong?

  34. India. Outsource our health care problems by zymano · · Score: 3, Interesting


    We need internet FAST ENOUGH(which it isn't) that we can hire indian doctors for the poor.

    Thats right. I am sure outsourcing to india would save the lower incomes a good penny.

    Robotic Surgery with a doctor all the way in India or China?

    Sounds good to me. I am sure the medical lobby will deem it too dangerous since they care for us so much.

  35. Or to test the software. by crovira · · Score: 1

    But then again, WHO IS?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. They always have to find negative news by kuriharu · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Although, it sounds good for US job growth, the implication is that firms outside the US appear to be dominating more and more in the global economy, even from developing and underdeveloped regions of the world.


    First, the bad news was that jobs were being outsourced. Now the bad news is that the jobs are coming back to the US.

    1. Re:They always have to find negative news by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume its bad news?

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
    2. Re:They always have to find negative news by kuriharu · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's bad news at all. Jobs coming back to the US is a good thing to me. BUt the comment said something like "although this seems like good news, it implies that other countries are dominating the US blah blah". So they were basically saying "this seems like good news but it's really bad news". Also, it came from NPR. 'Nuff said.

    3. Re:They always have to find negative news by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      You should take a look at who wrote up the article. Your assumptions are incorrect, on many counts. It seems yr biases are clouding your ability to analyze the information you receive.

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
  38. Its all fun and games until ... by tgd · · Score: 1

    the job you had before it was outsourced was outsourced back to you at 1/3 the pay!

  39. Do you have any idea about Indian bureaucracy ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have been outsourcing jobs to a country with one of the most suffocating civilian bureaucracies in the world, with government-provided healthcare to boot.

    So tell me why India has not been moving IT jobs to the US?

    You do understand that the US is ALONE in all developed nations in NOT providing universal healthcare? Do you know that the tax burden in the US is almost the lowest in the industrial world (I think maybe Japan is less)?

    You understand that US manufacturing has been effectively outsourced to the People's Republic of China? This is a country run by the Communist Party for Christ's sake! If "free markets" are so great, then why has the last great communist dictatorship swallowed our jobs (and own a huge chunk of our debt)?

    Of course, don't let reality get in the way of your political rant. Rather than look at incompetent political and corporate leaders, you would prefer to blame the average person for wanting a better life. In your fantasy world, it is the powerless who are to blame, for not granting the rich and powerful event more power and wealth.

  40. wipro shampoo by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Wipro is a conglomerate that makes and sells soaps and shampoo and other baby products. Are we sure it is the IT division that is opening the office in Atlanta, GA, and not one of the soap division opening an export office?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:wipro shampoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear ignorant

      I don't know where you live but Wipro is better known as a software services company - in the US, Europe and even in India since the mid 90's.

      Also thank you for not RTFA.

      PS Forgive me if it was your borked attempt to obscure humor.

    2. Re:wipro shampoo by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      Wipro started out as a conglomerate in the 70s. The software division began in the mid 90's and since then it has overshadowed the other lines of business. Did you really find it easier to look for wiprocorporate.com rather than wipro.com which should be more obvious? Of course you could've RTFA, but then this is Slashdot...

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  41. Reasons for this by Necroman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Listening to the audio version of the story, I found a few key points:

    * US programmers are still much more expensive than programmers in other countries.
    * Wipro has software houses in multiple countries around the world, their is their first Software house in the US though.
    * US programmers know about the culture and idioms of this country, which is needed for some jobs.
    * Any defense contracts must be worked on my US based developers.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
    1. Re:Reasons for this by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      Any defense contracts must be worked on my US based developers.

      Even so, I would think there is a security risk if the code is shared with the other branches outside the US. Or possibly proprietary (closed source) libraries developed outside the US are integrated into the US developed versions - even if not proprietary, the channels for US communication to another non-US jurisdiction is pretty apparent. While having US staff may be a good facade I if I was a security guy I would be looking at the whole picture there.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  42. I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't the car companies private companies? Aren't the workers private citizens?

    Did not a private company agree to pay for private citizen's health care? Are there any other costs I can foist on my employer? I'd like them to pay for my car and house. Is there some foisting forms I need to fill out to compel them to pay for whatever I'd like?

    No seriously, you're onto something about shifting costs, but this example is really an awful one. It would have more meaning if the government mandated that companies provide health care, but they don't. So explain how you prevent companies from offering a legal benefit to their workers, and why this would be good public policy?

    If my company wants to offer me free pizza on Friday, is that something government needs to be concerned with? How about if they offer me a gym membership... is that something the government needs to start setting policy around?

    It's almost like you want a laissez-faire government, and want to back it up with strict government regulations to make sure of it. It's an oxymoron.

  43. Excellence is no longer the goal (LOL) by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I laughed out loud at this.

    Businesses consider cost over quality 80% of the time.

    So you are always losing excellence as they cut meat, defer upgrades, stifle PO's for required software and then get upset later when you do not achieve excellence.

    The easy ride for businesses of cheap IT is ending in 2010. We are already losing people left and right at my corp because other local businesses are giving them 20% raises-- and we pay what I thought was darn good salaries (around six figures after bonus).

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Excellence is no longer the goal (LOL) by zeppelin71 · · Score: 1

      can you clarify why you mentioned 2010? I'm not sure what you're referring to.

    2. Re:Excellence is no longer the goal (LOL) by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Look around a little.
      You'll see articles going back to 2000 about the coming labor crunch.
      It is going to be a doozy.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  44. Re:Theories vs Facts by zeromorph · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You must be joking. Models in market theory are mostly oversimplified. Often to the extent that the results are useless for practical purposes.

    Why do you think investments in stock markets are still a risky business? Because all the investors do not listen to the academia? If models and theory in physics would be that unreliable nuclear power plants would regularly go boom!

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  45. <ballmer> by tepples · · Score: 1

    Hide!! Hide!!! Dont let the political correctness police get you. Nowadays, they call it Developing!!!!

    Developing! Developing!! Developing!!! Developing!!!!

    </ballmer>

  46. LIES LIES LIES!!! by MCHammer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Atlanta Georgia and a lot of people are talking about how this company will be bringing jobs to Atlanta. The truth is that while they will be hiring people, this will result in a NET LOSS for Atlanta and the United States.

    The way this works is that Fortune 50 companies in Atlanta like Bell South, Coca-Cola, Delta, etc. have contracts with US based firms and employ US based resources. The movement is now to outsource to India. The problem is that they realize that they have to have someone in the United States to actually talk to the customer and deal with problems. These people will be the business analysts and the technical architects that feed the people off shore. While they say that these companies are creating jobs in the United States, the truth is that most of them will be landed resources also from India under H1B visa.

    The result of this is that the 50 people in Atlanta that were working in IT are now replaced by 40 off shore people, 5 landed people in Atlanta, and 5 local people. I'm not judging whether it's good or bad or right or wrong, I'm just clarifying what is really happening because most people are way off on this one.

    1. Re:LIES LIES LIES!!! by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      My company's experience with offshoring:

      Take 80 developers, mixed about 50% between full time employees and contractors. Bring in offshore providers like Infosys, Mphasis, Wipro. Through natural attrition (no layoffs), reduce employee count to about 25 developers. Replace domestic contractors with H1B contractors, double their numbers (still paying market rates, no cost savings). Add offshore, about 2.5x that number. Total headcount goes way up. Total cost goes way up. Time to market? Way up too. Quality of work? Way down. I can't fault the offshore guys, some of their people are genuinely very competent, and a lot of their work is too. It's bad management on our part. But see, that's the fundamental problem. You don't fix bad management with technology or offshoring and that's what a lot of companies are trying to do these days...including the one I work at.

    2. Re:LIES LIES LIES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Total headcount goes way up.

      I don't suppose you're aware that manager pay is usually related to headcount.

    3. Re:LIES LIES LIES!!! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      The truth is that while they will be hiring people, this will result in a NET LOSS for Atlanta and the United States. What?!? That's like saying that shopping at Wal-Mart doesn't save money!

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  47. USA has low cost of living areas also by MarkWatson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About 10 years ago my wife and I moved from a beach area in California to North Central Arizona - partly because it is a beautiful place and partly because a much lower cost of living in Arizona has freed us up to be more flexible in our working (or not working). Neither one of us has had a job in an office since our move, and we both only work on projects that interest us.

    Frankly, I can not understand why so many people trade both their time and preference to work on interesting projects for material stuff like frequently buying new cars, homes that are much larger than they really need, etc. I believe that this odd behavior is caused by a lifetime of subjecting oneself to advertising, but that is just a theory :-)

    1. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by karthikg · · Score: 0

      Whether it's due to advertising or not, such behavior by a significant portion of the humanity is good for all us. That's what triggers consumption and the good economic cycle. Of course in any group behavior, there are always "cheaters" (not derogatory..but from an evolutionary biology sense) and they gain more than the average. My feeling is people who don't participate in this rat race, gain more overall.

    2. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by olsailor8080 · · Score: 1
      Looks like you don't have kids. Add kids to equation and you will see what will happened with your flexible options of working or
      • not working
    3. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by vinn01 · · Score: 1

      Add kid's schooling to the equation and it gets even worse. Wait until you find out the percentage of graduates of the local school system who go on to a four year college. Now find a good private school. Now pay for it with your flexible options.

    4. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

      The kids have moved out long ago.

      And, spoiling our grandkids is not that expensive :-)

      That said, even for young families with kids, moving to less expensive cost of living areas still seems to make sense, as far as maintaining flexibility. The *big thing* is to avoid lots of debt - in the long run, families that can avoid debt tend to do well in just about any economic climate.

    5. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

      Well, my wife and I are "cheaters" since we live modestly, but well enough, and don't do our fair share purchasing stuff that we don't need.

      I understand your point about consumption triggering good economic cycles, but consider this: you owe your first allegiance to doing what is best for yourself and your family. Then consider what is good for your local community, then down the scale of concern should be what is good for your country, and then send best wishes to people living in other countries.

      I have heard this "got to support the US economy" argument many times, but I believe that if individuals act and spend responsibly, things will work out for the country as a whole much better than citizens and government engaging in massive deficit pending.

    6. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by MarkWatson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Education is a mess in our country - too many years of "borrow and spend" republicans slashing support for schools using the very lame excuse about "cutting back money going to the school bureaucrats".

      But, to your point: don't you think that support from family in studying and learning a pro-education attitude at home counts the most?

      A bit personal, but: my Dad and his brother were the only 2 children of a very poor minister in Iowa. They always had food, but essentially zero money. Both kids learned to respect school from their Mom who was a local teacher (who recieved very little salary) and worked their way through school and ended up teaching at Berkeley and Harvard.

      Another example: a friend from India had good grades, got accepted to Florida State. His parents could *just* afford to pay for his airfare from India and give him a few weeks living money for his arrival. He worked through college, and still finished in about 4 years although he did not have enough money to fly home for visits.

      Perhaps not handing everything to kids on a silver platter is not so bad?

    7. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      too many years of "borrow and spend" republicans slashing support for schools using the very lame excuse about "cutting back money going to the school bureaucrats"

      http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/10facts/edlit e-chart.html looks like funding support for schools continues to go up every year to me.

      --
      Software Inventor
    8. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by vinn01 · · Score: 1


      I agree that parents with a pro-education attitude at home counts the most. Peers matter too (and siblings). Most children would find it very difficult to soar with the eagles when they roost with the turkeys.

    9. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by Stradivarius · · Score: 1

      But, to your point: don't you think that support from family in studying and learning a pro-education attitude at home counts the most? It absolutely does. But if your kid is attending a school where most are struggling just to graduate, more advanced opportunities are unlikely to be available (whether it's the arts, AP classes, etc). Even the most educated and dedicated parents aren't going to be able to provide the variety and depth of educational opportunities that a good school system can.

      I went to a small-town school that was by no means bad. And I've done well for myself, largely a result of good upbringing and support by my parents, so no complaints really. But having lived in some different places after graduating college, particularly some high-population, well-to-do districts, the opportunities kids in these schools have blow me away. I would've have loved to have that available at my school. Having seen what's not just possible but being done in other places, it's something I'll look for in a town when I have kids.

    10. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

      Hello Josh,

      I wonder is those graphs are properly normalized by "real inflation". At least the Clinton and GW Bush administrations have jumped through hoops trying to make inflation seem to be far lower than it is.

      I would like to see the same graphs normalized by dividing by defense spending each year.

      I am not criticizing your post. I am just pointing out that after Clinton and GW Bush administrations (and don't even get me started on the "best Congress that corporations can buy"), that my trust in the federal government is on the decline - and I just don't believe the official inflation statistics.

    11. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      I don't believe official inflation numbers either. To much hedonic adjustment going on and there's the whole deal with "core inflation" which excludes food and energy (oh no food and energy are volatile; never mind everyone needs it to survive). At the same time, I'm wholly unconvinced that the throwing more money at schools will improve anything, as I don't think it's the lack of funds that is the primary problem, but that a lot of schools have basically become glorified day care centers. I think we might be better off getting rid of federal funding for schools along with all of the strings that come with it.

      --
      Software Inventor
    12. Re:USA has low cost of living areas also by paitre · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that odds are, the less -financial- support parents give to their children, the more independent and mature the kids will end up being.
      And honestly, that includes footing the bill, even in part, for college. If it's not earned the hard way it's not nearly as respected - myself being a case in point (I'm successful in spite of myself, IMO). I didn't give 2 shits about college (and even now, back taking classes, I'm finding it rather difficult to care), partially because I didn't have the entire burden on my shoulders.
      Now? I have the entire burden, and still don't care a whole lot because of how ingrained the earlier attitude is.
      I'm trying to fix that attitude, but it's hard when it's something life-long - that mommy and daddy will pitch in if there's financial difficulties. Outside of college, they haven't with me, but one of my brothers has had his life completely ruined by it - he is incapable of being independent, and his ex-wife is even worse (talk about spoiled...)

      I'd have to say that I'm more impressed with the children of rich/wealthy families continuing to be successful than I am with those that busted their asses to become successful. Why? The rich kids could have sat on their collective asses (and many do, don't get me wrong), fucked around, partied, and basically lived life without responsibility. The poor/poorer kids don't have that luxury (or is it really a curse...) and had to bust ass, work hard and actually strive for success. They value it more. Hell, they value it -period-. Unlike the pampered who have to make a conscious choice to step outside of the "rich kid" box, and work to make an independent name for themselves - independent of their family name, but a name in their own rights. This is -far- harder to do than you may think - "oh, you're Kraft's kid! Your dad....", or "Oh! You're a Rooselvelt", or "Oh! You're a Trump, your dad is such a success!". The Trump kids have done an -incredible- job of building their own identities even while working for their father. I don't think anyone can truthfully say that they are not hardworking and independent adults - you don't get through Wharton by being a lazy bastard (although you CAN apparently get through Harvard that way...)

      This isn't to say I don't respect those who busted ass to get from poor to wealthy - I do, and they deserve an immense amount of respect. As do those who step outside of wealth-inspired mediocrity and laziness. MarkWatson's father and uncle are awesome examples of what dedication, supportive families (a rarity in this country today, it seems), and a will to better one's self can accomplish. It's sad that, as a nation, we've apparently lost most of that.

  48. Non news by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    NPR is reporting Indian software maker Wipro is outsourcing positions to a development office opening in Atlanta, Georgia. Although, it sounds good for US job growth, the implication is that firms outside the US appear to be dominating more and more in the global economy

    So let me get this straight, a single company was found to open a US office, and the implication is that firms outside the US dominate the global economy ??

    NPR should adjust the weight they contribute to a single anecdotal case I believe.

    In a global economy you'll see Indian companies opening US offices and US companies opening offices in India. You'll see Japanese companies having US devisions that outgrow the Japanese ones and basically everything.

    Borders don't mean jack anymore. You pick a place that has the people you want, the market you want and the taxes you want, and go for it.

    1. Re:Non news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your first point in general as making a call with a single data point is the realm of the gut brain. Second point leaves me with a sense of uneasiness if it is true. In that case the us 'US Americans' once the wealth in the open system has flowed out of us, become the third world country for awhile never to be the same again for sure. The knowledge was all we had left, we clung to it after the US based manufacturing was gone. The higher paying knowledge worker salaries allowed other countries to build extremely successful factories employing our blue collar heart and allowing us to survive a bit longer. I fear the death certificate is all but signed at this point. We got lazy and fat and let the powers that be manipulate our collective emotions and keep us that way. Do they underestimate us, or is it truly game over?

  49. Kids choices? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would you really recommend IT to school kids evaulating future careers with the canon of globalization pointed right up IT's ass? Things may turn out okay, or they may get worse. But you have to admit the global monkey is on IT's back, making it a risky career choice.

    1. Re:Kids choices? by doombob · · Score: 1

      Please continue to tell people that IT is a risky choice. I will gladly continue in this line of work because I enjoy it, but I will enjoy it much more when I am worth more to my employers because not enough students flocked to IT careers in the next 5-10 years. Businesses with less than 100 employees (my bread and butter) will likely NEVER outsource to India when they can have someone in their office or building to code, support, and run an IT infrastructure.

  50. It reminds me of the dumb things people say by tkrotchko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the 80's when Japanese cars made real inroads in the U.S. car market, people would comment that Japanese cars were built better and more reliable than their American counterparts. Inevitably this would lead to talk of "fat lazy union workers", and would conjure up pictures of some fat slob with a cigarette dangling from his mouth only putting in the occasional bolt if the mood struck him.

    The reality is that quality in cars is engineered from the earliest drawings. It goes into the manufacturing process to ensure there is only one correct way to assemble something. It comes about because management is committed to a quality product. Not just the words, but they take concrete steps to ensure what goes out the door is the best that they know how to build.

    So the Japanese really were building better cars simply because the management of the company committed to building good cars. The proof was when Honda and Toyota moved manufacturing to the United States with no loss in quality. Nobody cares if their Accord is built in the U.S. or Japan, the cars are simply quality products.

    To this day, the myth of the lazy American work persists, I assume partly because American cars for the most part still fall below Japanese standards. Now somehow the Union makes line workers stupid and lazy, which is ridiculous.

    A large part of the reason unions arose in heavy industries was because management treated workers so poorly. That culture still exists in American automobile plants and leads to workers understand that the company will cheat them blind without a good contract. So the company treats people poorly and suffers the consequence in the factory.

    It's like you punch somebody in the face, and then complain when they punch you back.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by GalionTheElf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I too get really annoyed with this reasoning myself. I work in the automotive industry, in a very highly unionised environment and I don't think this has ever seriously impacted on the company's ability to produce quality.

      It was only when a large American car manufacturer bought up the group I work for, that we saw a marked increase in defects, both from the suppliers being squeezed and on their own production line where workers were being squeezed.

      I'd say my point is, unions aren't required for a decent work force but they certainly don't have to impact on performance/quality either unless paying a decent wage is seen as an impact.

      --
      I'm going over here and I don't know why!
    2. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by Tintivilus · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize that the Honda, Toyota, and even BMW plants in the US are non-Union shops, right? UAW is still limited to the traditionally domestic manufacturers and have repeatedly failed to make inroads at any of the on-shored plants.

    3. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you dig a little deeper you will find that there were some other issues that led to the better-built foreign cars. In the old days, car manufacturers would ship out product to dealers who would also stock spare parts. Quality control was handled under warranty by having the consumer go back to the dealer to have any manufacturing problem repaired. Then along came legislation that forced foreign manufacturer dealerships to pay duty on parts they stocked whether the parts were sold or not. This was a very big incentive to have foreign manufacturers expand their quality control departments so that the vehicle worked perfectly when it was driven off the lot.

    4. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by SoulRider · · Score: 0

      Well put, its not fat lazy union workers that have affected the quality of American automobiles, its greedy, untrustworthy, cut-throat managers.

    5. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by kgskgs · · Score: 1

      Could not agree more!

      I have visited automobile manufacturing plants in Midwest, both of USA and Japanese companies. Not more than 100 miles apart from each other, the picture inside the plant is drastic contrast. Japanese companies plant was much cleaner, much better organized, much more efficient than the American one. They relied heavily on systems and processes. Instead of relying on systems and processes, American manufacturers rely much more on personal skills of workers.

      K

    6. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which tends to reinforce his point that if you treat your workers well you don't need to worry about unions.

      Stated differently, satisfied workers make good products, efficiently.

    7. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by isaac · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the Honda, Toyota, and even BMW plants in the US are non-Union shops, right? UAW is still limited to the traditionally domestic manufacturers and have repeatedly failed to make inroads at any of the on-shored plants.


      Correlation doesn't imply causation. Foreign automakers only set up shop in states with "right-to-work" laws or legal climates favorable to union-busting.

      I'm not making any judgment about the relative merits of unionized auto manufacturing labor, just pointing out that foreign automakers set up shop in the US in an era where there was sufficient infrastructure and cheap labor in union-hostile states to make avoiding unions relatively easy.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    8. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by vinn01 · · Score: 1
      The company will cheat them blind without a good contract. So the company treats people poorly and suffers the consequence in the factory.


      The good company golden rule: Treat your employees the way you want them to treat your company.

    9. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by Foolicious · · Score: 1

      I don't know a lot about auto manufacturers and unions (ignorance has never stopped anyone from posting on slashdot...), but I wonder if unions don't impact quality by requiring more affordable (and perhaps lower quality) designs from the get-go (as you've said) because of the requirement of meeting a certain price point. Since labor costs with unions are, I believe, considerably higher, you've got to cut back somewhere, right? Just a thought or guess or something...

      --
      Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
    10. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in a factory, and let me tell you -- the depth to which factory workers will sink has me amazed that they are even still breathing.
      and thats with my strong bias towards labor (believing that if you dont develop your workers, you may as well pack up and go home (or become a lawyer/broker/financeagent)
      people are just not interested in working -- they want to collect a paycheck with as little effort (physical or mental) as possible. I've spent years developing my skills
      both inside and outside work -- the average factory worker waits til payday, runs to the bank, cashes out and hits the lotto, drink or women (at least mine).

      Give me something decent to work with and I'll have'em doing calculus in their head -- but if all I get is disinterested, no-responsibility naerdowells who's primary motivation in
      life is the pussy they chase, and whose greatest achievement (and I'm quoting here) "is learning to dance by getting up on the dance floor all by myself"... and perhaps,
      just perhaps, american products wouldn't suck ass. its sad really, but to be blunt, the problem is very much passing past the lower echelons. I can't remember the last
      time I talked to somebody that was 40- that had any clue what was going on. Seems to me that the populace has descended into the pits of stupidity, and frankly it
      annoys me to no end. I could list about a hundred and fifty examples off the top of my head, but really what would be the point.

    11. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      payment of skilled labor is not a problem, charge higher for your product - works with Germans.
      No the problem is that the US car manufacturers seriously missed the boat on emphasizing stuff
      like fuel economy and reliability while building pieces of crap that were over-priced. US manufacturers
      control costs by constantly trying to substitute cheaper equivalents; Europaen manufacturers build quality
      and charge the commeasurate price, and Japanese companies pick their feature-set with quality production
      and a target price in mind before design starts. Fundamentally different methods of manufacturing. Koreans
      are also making serious inroads extending Japanese manufacturing standards. Read alot more about manufacturing,
      and you'll spot the differences - especially if you work in a factory. Oh, and management here sucks ass
      because it won't invest properly in people, infrastructure or process (long-term).

    12. Re:It reminds me of the dumb things people say by DrunkenPenguin · · Score: 1

      because American cars for the most part still fall below Japanese standards.
       
      WOW! Really?! Is that really so? Let me tell you something - my 1966 Chevrolet Impala 2DHT Sport Coupe still runs great and looks great and I get the most joy when I drive it! I don't see too many of those 80s Japanese cars here in Finland these days, because those Japanese cars have rusted away!
       
      The way I see it - USA is the ONLY country where QUALITY cars were built that didn't cost a million. Quality cars would still be built in USA _IF_ you people would have appreciated your own country's products, but you wanted to get your cars cheap. My jewel - 1966 Impala 2DHT Sport Coupe was built here.

  51. We need more Engineers! by Trojan35 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Last week on Slashdot: We don't have enough engineers! Should we subsidize those majors in college?
    This week on Slashdot: Too many engineers! Salaries are falling!

    1. Re:We need more Engineers! by supremebob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Companies like IBM and Microsoft say that they need more programmers and engineers all the time. In reality, they need more CHEAP programmers and engineers from China and India. Paying for the experienced programmers and engineers already out there aren't as good for the profit margins.

    2. Re:We need more Engineers! by innerweb · · Score: 1

      Well, that would explain the rash of issues with certain operating systems and applications.

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    3. Re:We need more Engineers! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wikipedia says the number of engineers in the USA has tripled in the last three months. It must be true!

      Or at least it will say that by the time you read this post.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:We need more Engineers! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      The short-term problem is, global economic forces are driving engineering out of the US; in that sense there's an oversupply here. But long term, our lack of ability to engineer things will become a strategic disadvantage and could hurt us badly economically and otherwise; in that sense it's a shortage.

      In general, it seems like we are getting by skimming the value off the hard work of other countries (and immigrants). They make it, we market it and keep most of the profit. But they are building infrastructure and rapidly developing their economies, while we are going ever deeper into debt for plasma TVs, and blowing up and rebuilding Iraq over and over. It's going to catch up with us.

    5. Re:We need more Engineers! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I don't think companies like MS and IBM have any problem paying top dollar for qualified engineers. It's no secret that the US has fallen behind the rest of the world in math and science, which one could speculate is affecting the quality of US engineers.

    6. Re:We need more Engineers! by athdemo · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't underestimate /.'s influence. If you keep saying we have too many, there's gonna be some suicide pact among engineers.

    7. Re:We need more Engineers! by Xtravar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We always hear how Microsoft and Google only hire the brightest and make their working environment so cushy. I doubt that means they're looking for cheap developers. And judging from the quality of MS products, I think cheap developers would be disastrous to the thin trust their clients have left.

      My company, albeit not Microsoft or Google, hires a fraction of a percentage of the developers who apply... and we hire mainly out of college students so they aren't rejected for lack of experience. The truth of the matter is, there is a shortage of good, SMART developers.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    8. Re:We need more Engineers! by GBuddha · · Score: 1

      Last week the focus was on the U.S. This week the focus is on the world. Although it may not be obvious to many, there is a difference.

    9. Re:We need more Engineers! by homer_s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In reality, they need more CHEAP programmers and engineers from China and India. Paying for the experienced programmers and engineers already out there aren't as good for the profit margins.

      What is wrong with that?
      I also want cheap cars, cheap clothes, cheap shoes, etc. I assume a majority of consumers are like me. Why shouldn't companies act in the same way?
      If in the quest for cheap goods, I buy crappy ones, then I suffer. Similarly, if MS and IBM hire crappy coders just because they are cheap (something I know is true, at least in IBM's case), well then they will suffer.

      I don't understand why it is ok for Joe Sixpack to look for the cheapest product and not ok for EvilMegaCorp to do the same.

    10. Re:We need more Engineers! by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      No, there is no shortage of smart developers. That's like saying that IQ needs to be renormalized down.

      What we really have is a glut of companies who want the best but aren't willing to pay for it.

    11. Re:We need more Engineers! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You might think that but you would be wrong.

      Both have offshored huge numbers of jobs to india and the reason is cost- not skill.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    12. Re:We need more Engineers! by Rostin · · Score: 1

      "IT Professionals" are not engineers. No, not even the MCSEs.

    13. Re:We need more Engineers! by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      The US's primary educational system yes. Our on the job training and higher education however are still head and shoulders above anyone else's.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    14. Re:We need more Engineers! by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Engineer:
      a person who uses scientific knowledge to solve practical problems
      Since I know you were going for the bullshit "must have a degree" aspect of things I will also supply the following:
      the operator of a railway locomotive
      person skilled in a branch of engineering, ie mining or construction

      You also can get the fuck off your high horse anytime now.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    15. Re:We need more Engineers! by Rostin · · Score: 1

      You're right. My mistake. IT Professionals are engineers, after all. Along with plumbers, medical doctors, garbage collectors, stay-at-home moms, window washers, kindergarten teachers, and practically every other person on earth who might conceivably use scientific knowledge to solve practical problems.

      I don't know how these things are done in other countries, but everyone in the US should report to their respective state engineering boards bright and early on Monday morning to receive their licenses. Just to make it clear that we're genuinely sorry for all the confusion and (apparent) feelings of inadequacy, a gold star should be affixed to each one.

      Wow, that was liberating! Are there any other terms you'd like to dilute beyond all ordinary usage?

    16. Re:We need more Engineers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps because those Indians cannot get visas to work in America?

      By restricting immigration, we might save individual jobs but will lose entire industries to the outside.

    17. Re:We need more Engineers! by yoprst · · Score: 1

      MS has huge profit margins, so they can afford hiring just about anyone. The problem is they need competent engineers. Not everyone who thinks he/she's competent really is, despite the years they wasted sitting in front of the screen. What you describe is true for smaller shops - they really benefit from cheap labor.

    18. Re:We need more Engineers! by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry I kicked your title off whatever ivory tower you had it perched on. The definition I quoted is the original, the definition you are implying is a simple minded bastardization meant to make jackasses with inferiority complexes feel superior.

      Then again judging by your sig, I'm not the least bit surprised.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  52. Drive-Through Surgery by everphilski · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is, though... drive-through surgery works. Damn well. It's freaking amazing. My wife had to have two this summer: the first was a gallbladder removal, the second was a result of pain during her pregnancy (baby broke something, doc went in and fixed it). Cost $300 a pop, insured, in and out in less than 4 hours. Had 1-2 checkups for each following the surgery.

    Would you rather recover in a hospital, or in bed at home? I think that might be half the battle.

  53. Re:large pool of qualified applicants in the marke by tfaust · · Score: 1

    Can you really not find qualified people, or are you removing yourself from their consideration? If you want a superstar developer for cheap, they aren't even going to reply to your ad. And all the people you do see are probably no more qualified than the offshore resources you'll eventually hire. I agree that people who can think are in short supply, but the reality is you don't get that automatically just by going offshore for staff. In my experience, offshoring isn't about talent as much as cost savings. Coders are cheap and plentiful, developers are expensive and rare. Most companies that can't find talent are trying to hire developers at coder rates.

  54. spin the wheel again and again by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Knowing how to write C/C++/Java or anything else is not sufficient to be "qualified".

    As usual, you want somebody who has 5 years experience in YOUR co's exact 30 languages and 20 acronyms. Maybe if you try enough countries you'll find a match eh? Or get struck by lightning while winning a grand in Vegas.

  55. Re: India. Outsource our health care problems by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    We need internet FAST ENOUGH(which it isn't) that we can hire indian doctors for the poor. Thats right. I am sure outsourcing to india would save the lower incomes a good penny. Robotic Surgery with a doctor all the way in India or China?

    Doctor? Instead we'd get mugged by Bender controlled by Bendai.

  56. Already happened. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you will recall Wipro, Tata, InfoSys, InfoTech, Tech Mahindra, Satyam, Mphasis, Panti, and i-Flex have all been nailed for precisely this.

    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/conten t/jun2007/db20070626_139605.htm

    "Moreover, you seem to think this is automatically bad. As a generally benign tax-paying and extremely low crime population"

    You seem to be making a great deal of assumptions there that one might think betrays are certain corollary bias.

  57. Look for the Deliverator any minute. by peacefinder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Movies? Check.
    Microcode? Check.
    Now for high-speed pizza delivery...

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  58. Pure complete clueless B.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir, you are completely full of s***. You can find lots, and lots, of very talented people, which meet or exceed your requirements.

    All you have to do is pay more for them. It's that simple.

    Take any technical position. Budget $200,000 for a salary for it. I guarentee you'll find more than enough qualified applicants for it. The labor market is NOT tight. It's only tight for what you're willing to pay.

    If you were smart though, you'd be looking at a new college grad. Take them in and train them the way you want. Yes, that takes some management and planning skills. It's one thing which is lacking these days. You sound like no exception.

    So quit your whining and get a clue. This B.S. is tiresome and gets shot down every time some clueless twit repeats it.

  59. Language problems by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    I suspect this is more due to the relatively low takeup of Danish internationally.

    UK. No shortage.
    America. No shortage.
    English. Highly prevalent.

    Tell you what. Switch your country to English and all your labour shortage problems will go away.

    --
    Deleted
  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. Re:large pool of qualified applicants in the marke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    MOD PARENT UP - 100% Correct

    I established an offshore unit in India for an American software company. (I joked that my job was outsourced, but I clung to it so tightly that I went to India with it.)

    If you want a kid who read a 3 year old copy of "Teach Yourself Java in 10 Days" last weekend, sure, there are thousands of those all over India. I regularly turned away about 40 of those each week.

    An Immutable Law of the Universe: Software is fucking hard to write

    Finding people skilled at writing software is not easy. If you yourself are not actually skilled at writing software, you have almost no chance of determining if someone who writes software is bright, or full of bullshit. At that level, it truly "takes one to know one".

    Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of VERY smart software developers in India. However, those guys are just as rare as they are in the United States, and just as expensive. Even if you can find one for a cheap rate, it won't be long before another company realizes the developer's potential. Now with "Worked in American outsourced job" on their resume, they are ready to make the big bucks.

    Miscommunication leading to wasted effort, weird working hours, telco and travel costs is only the beginning. When you get on a conference call and the big boss back in the U.S. says on the speakerphone (with a room full of Indian software developers listening), "We don't want him *acting Indian* on us." only then does the difficulty in outsourcing show it's true magnitude. (Yes, this actually happened to me. Imagine being the only American in that room!)

  62. Globalization is good by unity100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    especially in IT. if going gets tough in one place, you can just move to another place.

    1. Re:Globalization is good by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      if going gets tough in one place, you can just move to another place.

      Only if you are single and don't have kids.

    2. Re:Globalization is good by unity100 · · Score: 1

      well, everything has its downs.

  63. I'm a consultant and he's right! - Mod parent up! by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These people will be the business analysts and the technical architects that feed the people off shore. While they say that these companies are creating jobs in the United States, the truth is that most of them will be landed resources also from India under H1B visa.

    Of all the points I have seen on this thread, the above quote is the most legitimate. I'm a business IT consultant with a focus on custom application development. I'm one of those "technical architects" he speaks of. Our local teams are rather small with our full-time consultants to build the foundation of the applications and we then tap into a pool of contractors to do fill in the implementations as provided by the design me, my fellow consultants and business analysts construct.

    One of the things the parent does overlook is that aside from experience and technical skill, clear communication skills are essential. I remember being told back in college in the late 90s I would need strong communication skills (granted English is my first language). I am not referring to only plain English but also an understanding of "International" English (to speak to our Indian associates and any other people who aren't familiar with localized metaphors) and business-speak. In addition, it takes a level of being assertive and proactive.

  64. Re:http://www.goatse.cx - Just wasting your modpoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that be on the parent or the sibling?

  65. Does this mean people from Ga by gnarlyhotep · · Score: 1

    will have to start doing the neeful?

    1. Re:Does this mean people from Ga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the most god-damned funny thing. You too know how Indians always use that bastard phrase: "Do the needful thing." I used to get bug reports from our Indian QA department and they would always close with that. I finally pointed out how funny that sounds to non-Indians and suggested: "Do what is required."

    2. Re:Does this mean people from Ga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then will kindly confirm asap!! :) [ i dont think many people will understand the comment and the reply ]

  66. Can You Imagine The Pay Rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get queries from Indian Recruiters and I rarely bother with them. The rates they offer are usually quite low. Anybody who wants to fall on their sword like that is welcome to these "McProgramming" jobs.

  67. Re:why does bloat matter? by toriver · · Score: 1

    Maybe he didn't want to bloat that thread further? :)

  68. In the Free World, if does not matter. by Erris · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In the free software world, one owner is as good as any other. If the software is free, it has no owners and the company location does not matter. There is nothing to own but your effort, so there is nothing to "give away".

    Foreign owners hiring US workers is the ultimate irony for jingoistic tools who sold their freedom to M$ and others to benefit the "US information economy". If you want US dominance based on merit, you should advocate free software. If you want US dominance at any cost, your persuit of non free software was a mistake. Either way, non free was a loser. Laws like the DMCA have harmed the ability of the US to compete in the world market. They benefited those who grew outside their influence and they will be used by them now that they are big enough. Justice only comes from freedom. Benefits gained outside of freedom don't last long and restrictions will always be turned against you.

    thankfully, we still have a great service industry, lots of restaurants, etc. That'll keep us safe in times of financial/world troubles.

    That's sarcasm, I hope. Burger flipping will not tide us through the next depression. If the US is to remain wealthy, it needs an industrial base and things to trade things that people want. At the rate things are going, China and India will have superior weapons to match their overwhelming manpower and we won't even be able to bully things people won't trade freely. That would not be so bad if China was a free country, but it's not and our inability to defend ourselves will be the end of our freedom.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:In the Free World, if does not matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreign owners hiring US workers is the ultimate irony for jingoistic tools who sold their freedom to M$ and others to benefit the "US information economy". (Emphasis mine)

      This from the "man" who submitted a journal entry to the Firehose entitled "Explosions Rock Hyperbad". If you think you were clever by correcting the spelling in the title, you weren't. The comments calling you out on your blatant racism are still there, as is the intentional misspelling in the body text.

      You are a small, vile, spiteful excuse for a human being, Twitter.

  69. that must be by m2943 · · Score: 1

    "Qualified IT workers"--that must be the meaning of "qualified" as in "a qualified statement" or "a qualified yes".

    Seriously, there is a big shortage of good IT workers. There are a lot of IT workers with credentials and degrees, but they simply aren't good.

  70. No... by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

    it's look pretty certain that YOU missed the irony.

  71. Hi, my name is Shanty and I'm from Bangalor ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    Say, Shanty, isn't your accent a bit too Southern?

    1. Re:Hi, my name is Shanty and I'm from Bangalor ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - he's actually from Kerala

  72. That's news? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Mexico has been oursourcing restaurants to the US for decades.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  73. To an extent by ShatteredArm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think you can find a statistically significant difference between those with certifications and those without. I bet you could find quite a difference between those with experience and those without, though.

    There is no relationship between certification and skill, positive or otherwise. If I go get a certification, am I worse than I was before? Absolutely not. We all have our reasons for getting them. I think the danger is replacing experience with certifications, or viewing certifications as anything other than rote understanding of technology.

    I would also argue that it is easy enough to find someone with a great deal of experience who still sucks at the job. If you've been a bad coder for ten years, you're still a bad coder. Some people just aren't cut out to be engineers, but they still somehow manage to hold down a job for a long time.

    1. Re:To an extent by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      I have had first hand experience working for Wipro-the worst 5 months of my career. They routinely make freshers with no experience mug up-yes, MUG UP the answers to certification exams and then take them-so that clients can be impressed with the 'certified' developers. The final straw for me was when they doctored my resume with fake experience and sent it over to the client-their people grilled me over my 'new and improved' resume and after that I walked out.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    2. Re:To an extent by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a heck of a consulting company.

      I had to embellish a little bit, it is true, but they realized the problem with sending underqualified people to work with clients. If you're looking to have repeat business, it is pretty stupid to send someone over who you claim can do everything in the book, but in reality doesn't know anything. I think it's pretty standard for clients to interview the prospective consultants now, though.

      And we aren't forced to get certs, either. There's a $200 bonus, but that's not even worth the time it takes to study for it.

    3. Re:To an extent by aevans · · Score: 0

      Actually, if someone is willing to get the certifications just to "jump through the HR hoops" to get a job, that probably means they're less than excellent. Are there a lot of good people who have certs? Yes, for various reasons. Are there a lot of excellent people who have? I don't think so. I know a guy who has often talked about getting some, but has never got around to it, because he's always got too many job offers.

    4. Re:To an extent by Karthikkito · · Score: 1

      Since you worked for Wipro, I presume that you worked in India? I think part of the problem is that the Indian educational system really rewards regurgitation and not critical thought (at least until universities, and even then, usually only at IIT/IIS/BITS, etc). The managers come in from such a system and they truly believe that mugging up is a good way to learn.

    5. Re:To an extent by Rexdude · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup, I'm still in India, never been to the US-an anachronism these days. Sad to say, even an IIT or IIM pedigree doesn't guarantee anything-I've seen quite a few such alumni who don't live upto the hype about their institutions.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    6. Re:To an extent by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      Embellishing is one thing, but claiming 2 years of experience by sticking in descriptions for fictitious projects that I never worked for is plain barefaced lying. They tried to justify it to me by saying essentially that they could get away with it-or that competitors like Infosys or TCS do it all the time. And of course, the office was nicely decorated with posters full of malarkey like 'trust and responsibility in relationships' and so on-empty slogans.
      As for certs-here you were forced to take the cert. exam but they reimburse the fees only if you clear it. It's hardly surprising that the value of certifications has plummeted in the market.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    7. Re:To an extent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the problem is that you've never met any good programmers from India. Spare us the bigotry.

      And for all the lame replies to come after this. Fuck you :/

  74. Re: India. Outsource our health care problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Not the poor. The well-to-do.

    Do you need non-emergency surgery? Soon, you will fly to India to have it done.

  75. demographics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong.
    As the years go by more and more oldsters are going to retire.
    There won't be enough folks to do the jobs.

  76. Some words of Caution Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A Number of Indian Companies have opened offices in the UK. However most of the staff are Indians and are paid Indian Salaries
    Very few 'local' are employed by them. Then they go in and offer really low prices to outsource you IT Management & Development.
    A few staff are here but the rest are back home in India.
    One organisation I was involved with was within 3 hours of being closed down (ie stopped from trading) due to total incompetance and lack of skills by the Indian Company who was managing their IT Systems.
    Also beware the 'learning on the job' of these companies. Another company sent some developers over here to 'help' me with a major project in London. They had zero no prior skills in this technology area and after a whole year of training by me they were still unable to develop projects for themselves from scratch.
    This was the same company who 'won' the IT management contract for a Bank in the Middle East. After 3 months they were thrown out as the entire ATM and Credit Card network was down for the EDE holiday period.
    Don't get me wrog, there are lots of very skilled Indian IT workers but in the main, they don't work for these companies very long after graduation. I am co owner of an IT company. The other owner is a very skilled guy from Chennai. H is now a British Citizen and so are his wife and kids. He hates these 'Indian' companies as much as I do. At least he can swear at them in Hindi etc.

  77. So your some of them it sounds like. by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    About 10 years ago my wife and I moved from a beach area in California to North Central Arizona

    I know I'll probably get scored as "Troll" or what not but...
    Sorry if this is a tad on the nasty side but you never hear about the things that happen to those "low cost of living" areas in the US when the Californian and Texas move in.

    Sounds like all the people from California that moved to Show Low, AZ - that place is a Shit hole now! I have gone back to visit my parents and friends on and off and am sickened as to how the developers have screwed up that town! It was a nice area back in the 80's early 90's but now it's an overcrowded dungpile. All the people from California and Texas came in bought up ALL the open forest land and tore down all the trees and covered the green pastures with cement! They even have taken over the lake that USED to be free to use and now have made it an "exclusive" lake - paid members ONLY. It's not the town I went to school in anymore. I feel sorry for my friends and family... I moved to another smaller size town (~ 40,000 people), but I didn't walk in thinking I owned the place, buy up a ton of open land and screw it up!

    Only one thing to say to those people!

    "Now that you've seen Arizona, go back to California - and take the Texan with you!"

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:So your some of them it sounds like. by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

      Not to worry: no offense taken.

      We and our local friends don't mind new people moving to town, in general. However, we live in a limited water supply area, and some large developers are building golf courses. WTH?

      This is a bit of a generalization: people who buy small modest houses, recycle, respect their communities, etc. are not the problem. People wanting MacMansions are. There is othing to do about an increasing population, but people should live responsibly. As a friend of mine says "we should be good ancestors to future generations".

      In Arizona, I think that the Phoenix area will not do well in the long run: too much of the economy is dependent on rapid growth, and the water supply will eventually be a limiting factor.

    2. Re:So your some of them it sounds like. by Stradivarius · · Score: 1

      To abuse the old saying, one man's McMansion is another's comfortably-sized house. Different people will have different views on just how big is living "responsibly" - having a large but well-built/insulated home is not necessarily a negative impact to future generations, the environment, etc.

      From what I can tell, the people unhappy about "McMansions" (however one may define that) are usually unhappy about the character of their neighborhood being changed from underneath them, rather than the house size per se. When someone puts down a house three times larger than all its neighbors, it sticks out like a sore thumb. And people willing to stick out like a sore thumb may not be the type of neighbors you want.

      I suspect if these owners built their houses in neighborhoods where they would fit in, nobody would be talking about McMansions.

  78. Unqualified Tech People by cromar · · Score: 1

    I am a US citizen, you insensitive clod!

    Seriously. But you're joking, right?

    1. Re:Unqualified Tech People by megaditto · · Score: 1

      From your spelling and your misconfigured vt100 caret codes I assumed you were a foreigner lamenting about Americans being overpaid. My apologies.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:Unqualified Tech People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      From your spelling and your misconfigured vt100 caret codes I assumed you were a foreigner lamenting about Americans being overpaid. My apologies.
      If there is no difference, why pay more?

  79. Re:large pool of qualified applicants in the marke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offer to pay someone good, good money and they'll come out of the woodwork. Don't think you're going to get a Porsche paying Yugo prices. Most people that take pride in their work take pride in their pay.

  80. Re:http://www.goatse.cx - Just wasting your modpoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What?

  81. Re:Theories vs Facts by megaditto · · Score: 1

    "larger pool of qualified applicants" would hurt wages
    Its just a THEORY... just like EVOLUTION and GRAVITY

    It's not a Theory, it's a hypothesis, and the one demonstrably wrong:

    From 1900 to 2000 American population has trippled in size (from 100M to 300M). Inflation-adjusted GDP has quindecimtupled (grown 15 times over!) for the same period (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_regions_by_pa st_GDP_(PPP) )

    As you can see, more people means more jobs means more prosperity for everybody!

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  82. So called increases in productivity by sauge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    US company makes gadgets ready for assembly.

    They send gadgets over seas to be assembled

    Gadget is sent back to US company for adding to another gadget.

    US company claims entire sequence as increase in US productivity.

    Is the productivity increase really said to belong to the US company?

    Many economists calculating GDP are beginning to question it.

  83. whatever happened to training? by SABME · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've seen a few comments from employers in this thread who bemoan the lack of experienced people in the job market.

    Whatever happened to hiring someone who was inexperienced, but still sharp, and developing that person? This is how I got my start in 1990: someone who had seen my work took a chance that I'd do a good job supporting the company's LAN, even though I lacked experience, and hired me. With the exception of a few months during the bust years of 2001 and 2002, I've been working in the field ever since (in a variety of different positions, most recently QA testing).

    One thing I noticed around the turn of the century was that there weren't any 20-somethings at work anymore. At age 34, I was far and away the youngest person at work. Where will the next generation of experienced old hands come from if not from within? At some point, all the experienced people will be too old to work any more, and then what will we do? The worst part of outsourcing is that we're outsourcing not just today's jobs, but the future of our talent pool.

    ((Let me cynically answer my first question ("Whatever happened to hiring ..."): regular corporate layoffs. To most managers, we grunts are nothing more than numbers in the "Expenses" column of a spreadsheet.))

    1. Re:whatever happened to training? by Dusty00 · · Score: 1

      The other facet of corperate America that,especially in IT, makes it difficult in a given company to take today's novice and turn in him to tomorrow's senior is that the way most American companies ajudicate salary is based on a percentage.

      Today right out of college in IT if you're lucky very you'll be making mid 40's, more realistic is probally mid 30's so let's use 35 as an example. First 3 years you perform well you're probally looking at 7% per year which would put you at 43 a year another 3 years down the road at the same rate you're at 52.

      With six years under your belt you're worth a lot more than 52 and quite often the only way to get it is to go to another company.

    2. Re:whatever happened to training? by pnuema · · Score: 1
      Whatever happened to hiring someone who was inexperienced, but still sharp, and developing that person?

      Simple. Let's say you hire someone with promise, train then, and let them get a few years experience. Three years later, that experience is worth tens of thousands more in the marketplace than you originally hired the person in at. Companies don't just say "hey, it's been three years, time to give you a 30% raise". Instead, the person goes to another company for the increase. Therefore, companies see that behavior as subsidizing the training for the competition, ignoring the fact that replacing the person that just left will cost more than giving them the raise in the first place.

    3. Re:whatever happened to training? by hiryuu · · Score: 1

      Where will the next generation of experienced old hands come from if not from within? At some point, all the experienced people will be too old to work any more, and then what will we do?

      It's not just in IT that this is occurring, but in other technical fields as well. I work in industrial specialty chemicals, and most of the big players in our markets (and in related/nearby markets) have, for the most part, simply stopped hiring people who don't automatically come with ~5-10 years experience. This has made for the beginnings of a shortage in able workers, made worse by the fact that onerous and heavily-applied non-competes in what is already a relatively narrow field of competitors means that people who leave their job generally leave the industry as a whole.

      It's a short-sighted approach to managing talent in the workpool, but then again, when hasn't American business (as a whole) taken the short view in recent years?

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    4. Re:whatever happened to training? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I too wondered why companies seemed to be thinking in the short run so often lately, but I learned that, economicaly, they're actually thinking long term because of the increased rate at which technology has been changing.

    5. Re:whatever happened to training? by grumpy_old_troll · · Score: 1

      I'm a senior software engineer at a network equipment company.

      We experimented a bit ago by hiring a bright fpga guy (one who could tell a good design from a bad one) who was bored with hardware for a software position, even though he didn't have much experience with software development or networking.

      That's been very successful, and next time we're off our hiring freeze, I'm going to try to make it happen more often.

      I can't count how many interviews I've been through with some guy with a master's degree and a resume that reads like they've been training for our open position for 8 years, only to find out they can't troubleshoot anything tricky, can't catch reasoning flaws, and can't tell the difference between an elegant solution and a spaghetti nightmare.

      I'd so much rather have somebody who needs some basic knowledge hand-holding for a few months, but often has good insights in a high level discussion, and just keeps on getting better at the coding part.

    6. Re:whatever happened to training? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Companies don't just say "hey, it's been three years, time to give you a 30% raise". Instead, the person goes to another company for the increase. Therefore, companies see that behavior as subsidizing the training for the competition, ignoring the fact that replacing the person that just left will cost more than giving them the raise in the first place.

      This is idiotic. I do not understand why companies are not willing to grow their workforce organically.

      Some of the best companies out there do this (McDonalds, Walmart, Allstate, AT Kearny), and it radically changes the attitudes of the workers.

      Giving a 5% raise to a worker who started out a $30,000 doing crap work, but has grown into managing millions of dollars of sales is moronic, and means the management sucks. Pay your workers what they're worth, give them good benefits, and productivity goes way up, and churn goes way down.

      Some of my friends work at companies like that, and I don't get it. Particularly when the company is making oodles of money; why be cheap? You're really only hurting yourself.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    7. Re:whatever happened to training? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      We're in the chemicals business, and we regularly get applicants that have an incredible resume, and a well respected Phd or Masters degree.

      Sadly, they often can't answer the basic, first-line interview questions. It's really hit-or-miss, and we've been much better served with people who are less qualified, and less set in their ways.

      *grin* We also do well poaching people from some of our contractors :)

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  84. Re:http://www.goatse.cx - Just wasting your modpoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure an editor didnt just smack you?

  85. Swedish code is still legible by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Funny

    cpsJust vbDont vbOutsource ppYour nCode prepTo cntryHungary.

    1. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm actually a fan of Hungarian notation. It's nice to be able to know both the scope and type of a variable just by looking at it.

    2. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's building a tool (understanding scope and type) into your coding style. Always a bad idea. Build the tools around your coding style, and keep your style as elegant and simple as possible.

      As a relatively trivial example of where this goes wrong, refactoring such a variable can trivially result in the code lying to you about the type and scope of a variable. If you instead have a tool that will tell you the scope and type based on inspection, it will never lie to you.

      Hungarian notation was a bad bad idea created by someone with a poor understanding of and lacking insight into the problem they were trying to solve.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Swedish code is still legible by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm actually a fan of Hungarian notation. It's nice to be able to know both the scope and type of a variable just by looking at it.

      Dammit, Simonyi, no one asked you! Now just go away.

      --
      That is all.
    4. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree. Refactoring is a very trivial problem to solve as well. Hungarian notation is generally only used for private and local variables and in that case "refactoring" just means doing a search-and-replace.

      I actually got into the habit of doing this by working with a blind co-worker who couldn't easily use most the tools that modern IDEs provide. I've actually found it improved my productivity to not have to rely on these kinds of tools and have all the information I need on the screen at one time.

    5. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Hungarian notation was a bad bad idea created by someone with a poor understanding of and lacking insight into the problem they were trying to solve. Well said! And let's not forget about the morons that think '_' or '__' (that'd be 1 underscore and 2 underscores respectively) preceding or following a variable name to indicate instance or class scope is a good idea (or preceding with 'm', or any variation of such a process). I cringe everytime I see code like that. Not only is the underscore a typically unusual keystroke to make while typing out variable names, you also wind up having to select and count, especially when there's two variables (e.g., _count and __count) spread throughout a particular piece of code.

      Now granted, modern IDEs help greatly with variable identification and refactoring, but those very tools negate whatever misguided reason such practices claim to exist in the first place.
      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      Similarly, I never bother to write functions since they just hide details of the implementation. All my programs are one big nested set of lambda declarations. You should be able to tell everything about an object just by looking at it.

      Sure, I've heard some fancy modern programming environments can actually show you definitions of objects just by mousing over an identifer. But that seems like technogical overkill. Why should I have to stop using sed when it's so easy just to pack everything into one line with the variable name?

    7. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      Surely you realize that modern programming environments are not accessible to everyone for various reasons?

    8. Re:Swedish code is still legible by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1
      So everyone has to waste time doing hungarian notation so that our otherwise enabled brethren might more easily grok the code?

      Hell, next time, you would suggest to code so that a North-American Business Analyst can understand it? (Yes, that's a separate category of users from where I work).

    9. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Surt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're making my case for me: you're asking programmers to put overhead time into their work to make hungarian notation work (and demanding that they not make mistakes!). Hungarian notation is error-prone. It's not going to help your blind coworker if it is wrong.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      But it was very rarely wrong and when it was, we fixed it, and it helps a lot more than the red underline and pop up windows he couldn't see.

    11. Re:Swedish code is still legible by be-fan · · Score: 1

      If you're losing track of these things, your functions are too damn big. As Linus said, except in rare cases, functions should fit on a single page. If you always have the definition site of a variable in view, it's easy to remember the type and scope without having to encode it into the function name.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    12. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      It's not a waste of time. Actually typing code is maybe 1% of the total time it takes to develop something and it can easily save hours in analysis.

      See http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Wrong.html for more details.

      Also, sometimes it's just not possible, because not all languages have a modern IDE that supports it.

    13. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      That works fine for functions. What about classes? How do I know the types of member variables without opening the header file to check? By "types" I don't necessarily mean the data type, but also information about how it should be used. An annotation. It is common in web applications to have strings input by users that need to be cleaned before they are put into a database. You can differentiate these by giving it a prefix like str_ucFirstName and you know that anything marked with uc should never be written into the database. Compiler tools generally can't spot this sort of thing.

    14. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Heembo · · Score: 1

      BUZZ wrong answer. You do not write code for computer. You do not even write code for the human who is developing the solution. You write code for one reason: to help the human who has to maintain your code do so quickly and efficiently. That's why adding tools into your code, like hungarian notation, is so crucial. I want the scope, type, and a verbose message telling me wtf the variable is for. Sure, I don't really need that when first writing the code, but it's crucial to help me edit/maintain the code down the road.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    15. Re:Swedish code is still legible by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      You do not write code for computer. You do not even write code for the human who is developing the solution. You write code for one reason: to help the human who has to maintain your code do so quickly and efficiently.

      Err, do you mean code comments rather then code? If not then pass the peace pipe 'cause I want a hit.

      --
      Software Inventor
    16. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Heembo · · Score: 1

      If you are writing code for just a computer, then go back to assembly. We have 4gl languages that are so abstracted the computer actually operates on the code very efficiently (Java, PHP, Ruby). Why the inefficiency? So humans can modify the code better. So Humans can understand the code. Hence the power of Hungarian notation.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    17. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Heembo · · Score: 1

      I meant to say "computer operates on the code very inefficiently"

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    18. Re:Swedish code is still legible by S.O.B. · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Linus also said:

      Encoding the type of a function into the name (so-called Hungarian notation) is brain damaged - the compiler knows the types anyway and can check those, and it only confuses the programmer.
      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    19. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Surt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with hungarian notation is that it conveys the most useless information about variables. Information which is guaranteed to be documented elsewhere. It harms subsequent maintainers because it encourages you to store useless information in variable names which of course winds up discouraging you from storing useful information in those variable names instead.

      I'm in complete agreement with everything you said, except that Hungarian notation is a good tool for what you want. It's a bad, bad tool. Bad for developers, bad for maintainers.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    20. Re:Swedish code is still legible by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      Right, cause 4G languages have nothing to be with being able to develop the software faster in the first place, and it's only about modifying the code later. Humans developed better code viewing tools so that they can understand code better. Hungarian is the assembly of code understanding, and it can not provide nearly as much information as modern source code editors can. Why have a human do the work the machine can do?

      --
      Software Inventor
    21. Re:Swedish code is still legible by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, I typically argue for the "Just make your variable names easy enough to understand" side of programming style. I tend to take it to such extremes such as naming variables "VariableThatTakesTheLoopRotatesIt90DegreesAndMake sItSayNe" which would be a tad overboard. I've had many a programmer tell me they've gotten Carpal Tunnel on working with my code, but I always retort "Yeah but you understood what it did fairly easily no?", them: "Well...." Anyways to each their own

      --
      ...in bed
    22. Re:Swedish code is still legible by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because I"m used to a language without training wheels or something (C), but I find when I read clean, well written code written by others, it is not a big deal to figure out the type and scope of any variable. Couple that with the fact that I would never trust that a variable once called lpstrSomething is, still, a local pointer to a string called Something, I'm going to figure out the type/scope of the variable on my own anyways.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    23. Re:Swedish code is still legible by JimDaGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Seriously, Hungarian notation sucks. I hated doing MS C programming with all the Hungarian crap.

      Using crap like iplnvldakljdorSFName is just stupid (yes, I exaggerated that, but you get the point).

      I use and like simple constructs. If it is a reference type object, I use a c for the class, cEmployee. Then during instantiation I just use whatever. If I want to be extra anal, I will use on o for the instantiated object name:

      cEmployee oEmp = new cEmployee(foo);
      oEmp.Name = "Bush";

      Honestly, Hungarian notation is just crap and is way outdated. I use simple notations. If it is an integer, I use i, iNumEmps. If it is a long I use l, lNumEmps. If it is a string object, I use s, sMyName. If it is any other object, well that is why and good IDE will list the type of the variable if you just hover for a second or so. I would rather see code that has a variable oFooBar and use "intellisense" to really see info about that object than to have a bunch of stupid prefixes to try to tell me about an object.
      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    24. Re:Swedish code is still legible by doktorjayd · · Score: 1
      but dude,

      you are using hungarian notation, just not to the nth degree!

      clean code without having the scope part of the class/variable name would be:

      Employee employee = new Employee("Bill");
        Manager manager = new Manager("Sally", "Development Services");
      ...
        employee.setManager(manager);
      of course, it all comes down to how the rest of your team slap their code together as well, and i've always found that the convention for these sort of things doesnt matter nearly so much as everyone using the same convention.

    25. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Adelle · · Score: 1

      Using Hungarian notation to indicate that a variable is an integer may be pointless, but using a prefix to indicate that a variable represents an integral number of twips rather than pixels, or to distinguish between string variables which hold sql strings and string variables which hold html strings is useful. Even more so if you are coding in a language that doesn't support typedefs.

      http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Wrong.html

      Adelle.

    26. Re:Swedish code is still legible by GalacticCmdr · · Score: 1

      Including a link to Joel in a development article is like pulling a Godwin. I am sure he means well and maybe in real life he may be quite different, but like all bloggers with an ax he swings it in the most mindless page-snagging way. Being strongly opinionated is far more important than actually saying something intelligent. Like Jeff Atwood at Coding Horror who I swear must huff before it sits down to blog about something as he pulls a strange stream of thought from beginning to end.

      --
      Programming: Its not just a job - its an indenture.
    27. Re:Swedish code is still legible by m2943 · · Score: 1

      I'm actually a fan of Hungarian notation. It's nice to be able to know both the scope and type of a variable just by looking at it.

      I don't have any trouble with that in my code. Why? I use short methods, small classes, and small numbers of arguments.

      When people feel the need to use Hungarian notation to "know both the scope and type of a variable just by looking at it", there is generally a deeper problem with their programming style.

    28. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Surt · · Score: 1

      As I suggested in response to others, if you're a big joel fan, you're not bright enough to work for me.
      I have to ask: have you thought about why you have this problem? Does the fact that you are passing around naked strings representing both sql and html not bother you? Is the obviously better solution not obvious enough? Every language I have seen has a straightforward solution to this problem, including c, c++, java (the primary languages for which I see hungarian prescribed).

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    29. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you really have an Axe to grind with Joel. Did you ever consider that most people are linking his article because it supports our point, not because everybody is a mindless 'Joel' fanboy?

      You are clearly obsessed with this man.

    30. Re:Swedish code is still legible by serge587 · · Score: 1

      Information which is guaranteed to be documented elsewhere. You've got to be kidding me...
    31. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Surt · · Score: 1

      I assumed people were linking Joel because they're making an appeal to authority:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority

      In spite of the fact that I already debunked the actual arguments made in that article. If I've already poked holes in the content, what's the point of linking him other than appeal to authority? I'm left with either repeating myself, or attempting to debunk the appeal to authority. I went with the second. I mostly could care less about Joel, but I'm pretty strongly against logical fallacy.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    32. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Surt · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood me, and that misunderstanding is probably my fault: in all statically typed languages (the languages for which hungarian is promoted) the type of a variable or function is always available somewhere. I wasn't claiming that someone wrote a comment, or whatever ('documented'). Just that the type information is guaranteed to be discoverable in other ways.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    33. Re:Swedish code is still legible by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      Right. You assumed that. Nobody actually argued that something was correct because Joel said so.

      You never directly addressed any of the arguments in the article.

      If you are so against logical fallacy you should probably stop using the ad hominem argument.

    34. Re:Swedish code is still legible by Surt · · Score: 1

      I didn't.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
      "
      An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the person", "argument against the man") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to an irrelevant characteristic about the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim.
      "

      Emphasis mine. If you feel like I didn't address the article directly, well, not much I can do about that.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  86. So.. by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 1

    Let me get it straight:

      When there is outsourcing TO India ppl complain, when there is insourcing FROM India ppl complain.WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU WANT PEOPLE???

    1. Re:So.. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Cut the whole thing out completely.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:So.. by phedre · · Score: 1

      It's always like that though. Around here we get two complaints about the weather.

      1. OH MY GOD IT'S RAINING!!!! I wish the sun would come out finally!

      2. OH MY GOD WE NEED RAIN!!!! We're going to have a drought!

      We just can't be happy with anything.

  87. With Cohen to lead the charge by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    No doubt about it, they'll figure out how to trample upon the US once again.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  88. as if we didn't see this coming.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    been saying for years that it's only a matter of time before the rates go up and outsourcing becomes outsourcing for the outsourcing...

    go figure - people lose jobs in america to india because companies say that there are no "qualified candidates". now india outsources it back to the U.S. - wait a sec... I thought there were no qualified candidates? so it takes indian companies to find these qualified candidates in america?

    am i the only one who sees the "middle man" that we can do without?

  89. Taft-Hartley strikes again by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Not to mention their presence being heavily south of the Mason-Dixon line, where they've used Taft-Hartley to ensure that it doesn't happen.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  90. Re:large pool of qualified applicants in the marke by zrq · · Score: 1

    Out of interest, would you accept an applicant who wanted to telework ?
    I used to work in commercial IT in the UK, but almost nowhere was prepared to consider teleworking or flexible hours.

    In my experience, a lot of commercial IT roles involve a huge heap of office politics and bureaucracy that date back to the 1970s.
    I quit commercial IT and joined an academic project as a software developer. So did many of the other people on our team.

    We now have a team of very skilled developers and an excellent project manager, all of whom telework from home.
    We use a lot of the same tools and techniques that open source projects use to keep everyone on a distributed team working together on the same page.

    I don't think any of us would want to go back to commercial world.

  91. one time sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We sell those things to china one time, then that's it, they clone them. Yes, even heavy equipment. A friend of mine sold a buncha heavy equipment to china once, a pretty decent 8 figure order, one sale, one time, after that identical copies were being peddled from there under some weird label, and much cheaper than the US brand.

  92. Probably they think you're overqualified by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

    I work for a small company, and when we were searching resumes for a new position, I ignored all the people with master's degrees. We're looking to pay ~$45k/yr for a programmer, (it's in the Midwest, so cost of living is low here), and someone with your qualifications is easily worth twice that. Quite frankly, we wouldn't have enough work for you to do, and what we have wouldn't be challenging enough.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
    1. Re:Probably they think you're overqualified by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I stopped listing my Master's degree on my resume.

  93. Don't Forget Political Motivations by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Much like every other global company that wants to do progressively more business in the U.S., you must get the politicians on your side. That entails offices/plants so they can actually get meetings inside the political system. Otherwise, no one will give you the legislative time.

    The parent post is right on and warrants 5+ informative moderation.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  94. Qualified Applicants? by jc42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Similarly, salaries of IT professionals world-wide are projected to stagnate or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today.

    Hmmm ... In my experience, the pool of "qualified applicants" has fallen to almost zero.

    The explanation is well known to us software people. I remember back in the 1980s, when I ran across an ad for people with at least five years experience in a certain popular DB system. At the time, that DB system had been available from its vendor for almost 3 years.

    These, a different variant of this approach is being used more and more. I've registered with a number of the well-known online job sites, and I get a dozen or so job descriptions every day. A number of my friends do this, too. It's quite rare to see a job description that any of us is qualified for. We get the descriptions because some fraction of the keywords match words in our resumes. However, each description has at least one requirement that I don't have. It seems fairly clear that for most of these, the probability is close to zero that a person exists anywhere on the planet with experience that matches every requirement. There is usually a list of other "nice to have" things, but those don't really matter if you don't have the required experiences.

    We've tested a few of them that are sorta close by replying, with a more up-to-date resume, but typically there's no response at all. When we get a response, it's usually that we aren't qualified (but they'll keep our resumes in their DB in case an appropriate job comes up).

    I have talked to a few HR people, to, of course, and they agree the approach is to write the job requirements to that nobody will actually be qualified. This gives them two options: One is that, if after a phone call they like you, they can say that they'll consider you although you're not qualified, but they may have trouble persuading their managers to pay you the stated rate due your lack of qualifications. So the intent is downward pressure on pay scales, because everyone is now "unqualified".

    Alternatively, of course, this is done so that they can report that they couldn't find anyone in the country (the US in my case) that is qualified, so they'll just have to outsource the job. Or maybe look for a H1-B immigrant to hire as a trainee at a much lower salary. Or, of course, a student trainee or intern that can be hired for much less than even the immigrants.

    Actually, I did have a 2-year job a few years ago, and interestingly it was a project for a UK firm that had outsourced the task to an American software company. But I got this job because I knew several of the people who owned the company. The team did include several H1-B people (and a couple of Canadians ;-). My part of the task was a single requirement that they literally couldn't find anywhere else in the world. I was a bit puzzled by that, because it was actually just a tricky bit of programming of some abstract math and pattern matching (in C), but I didn't quibble.

    Anyway, it doesn't seem like "globalization" is the whole explanation here. Rather, IT employees have learned how to classify everyone, even the most experienced, as unqualified for any current job. So you accept an entry-level wage, or you are dismissed as unqualified.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  95. Re: India. Outsource our health care problems by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Chat log of remote surgery:

    Surgeon(India): "We are beginning lateral incision now"

    Nurse(Atlanta): "Oops, looks like you nicked the bracheal artery, would you like me to clamp?"

    Surgeon(India): "..."

    Nurse(Atlanta): "Doctor we should really cla...Oh my god! Stop cutting!"

    Surgeon(India): "..."

    Nurse(Atlanta): "Aaaa! There's blood everywhere!"

    Surgeon(India): "Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag."

    Remote surgery is well and good, but you do surgery from the other side of the planet and you're chancing SERIOUS problems.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  96. Re:Not so. by sethstorm · · Score: 1
    Sounds like a copypasta from somewhere, but...

    It doesn't help too that many Americans view things like health care as their God-given right Then why do corporations wish to act as if the world was theirs to shape as if they were God?

    Eastern Europe is a very good example ...of letting the corporations act like God, save for one country that had some bravery to stand up to such trickery.

    GM, for example, has about $1,500/car in expenses just for health care that it has to pay for its union workers, many of whom haven't gotten the memo: most corporate employees don't get these benefits, why should they? Apparently you haven't gotten the memo about all that government sponsorship in Japan.
    The only things the UAW forgot to do was to close the "Made in US from Japanese design/parts" loophole and repeal Taft-Hartley(unlikely under President PATCO(Reagan)).

    Deregulation, a simplified tax code and making people pay their own way are the only things that will make America able to compete with these leaner, cheaper countries. Tariffs would do the same thing, without lowering quality. Now if you want to remove Taft-Hartley and stop trying to kill quality goods, then we can talk. Until then, stop shoving I4 coffins and shoddy electronics into the US until people want them out of boredom.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  97. Fact-check time by Scareduck · · Score: 1

    Honda of America Mfg., Inc., Marysville, Ohio. 3.8M sq. feet, 5,300 employees.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  98. Ok, I guess it's somewhere in the middle by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    What I do know is that an MRI was 1000$ for the insurance, but would have been 2-3000$ if I requested it myself.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Ok, I guess it's somewhere in the middle by seebs · · Score: 1

      Insurance companies sometimes negotiate a flat rate for some services, which CAN be lower than the one you'd pay. It's just that, often, it goes the other way too.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  99. Re:Hi, my name is Shanty and I'm from Kerala ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...who just got back from an antiglobalization protest.

  100. The hiring pool sucks too by phorm · · Score: 1

    I've seen plenty of jobs that advertise as the following:

    Looking for 5-7 years experience developing in PHP, Perl, C#, ASP and VB.NET
    Require skills using windows/IIS servers, as well as Linux, Solaris, and AIX. Qmail, Sendmail, Active Directory, Exchange server, IIS, Apache blah blah. Oh, and Java too
    Pay rate: $45k-55k/year (well, sometimes it's a bit better than this)

    Now the thing is, I've got quite a number of those. I'm still good enough with my C-coding to debug many of the projects I run across (but those tend to be GCC compiled). My earlier days of coding involved a lot of VB and VC++, but I migrated towards more of a PHP/Perl environment as well as towards Linux server admin as opposed to windows

    Do they really use all of the above, or even a heavy combination of both windows/ASP+C#+VB.NET dev and Linux/PHP/Perl at the same time? Many of the developers I know might be somewhat familiar with one, but tend to be most skilled at either the linux-type languages, or the windows-type languages. Ditto for the System Administration stuff. I'm primarily proficient at dealing with Linux servers, it's what we use in our shop. To keep my skills up, I'm poking at Solaris when I have free time, but I doubt I'll have a chance to crack at actual Sun hardware or any AIX/HP-UX boxes anytime soon. I've supported win2k servers but those were in times past, and my Active Directory/Exchange skills are somewhat lacking. Thus, these days my primary skills lie in administrating Linux Servers.

    Could I do most of the above? Well, I couldn't do all of them equally well, and I would be very hard pressed to find somebody who is an expert or even extremely strong in all of those categories. Yes, you might see somebody who's damn good with Linux servers as well as many of the Unixy variety. Chances are that type of shop is going to be predominantly Linux/Unix though, maybe with a few windows servers but nothing overly heavy. Could I learn all of the above, sure. Instead of listing everything under the sun, at the very least I'd like to see a position that says 80% Linux Servers, 20% windows. I'm confident I could manage that environment and then learn/re-learn more of the windows stuff as I have the opportunity. I've been hard-pressed to find any tech that I couldn't get a handle on very quickly (short of some with absolutely terrible documentation and low proliferation).

    Same with coding. You might find a guy that primarily does PHP/Perl, maybe Java, but if he's doing those I doubt he's big on ASP or VB.net (the inverse applies for the MS programmers as well). Nowadays I'm one of the more PHP/Perl type guys (used to be perl, but now more PHP). Could I fix up a page using ASP? Sure thing! I remember once where I worked we had a contractor that developed a system (against my recommendation) using ColdFusion. It had some pretty big bugs, and I was the one that ended up fixing them, despite not having touched CF before. The same for C++ stuff, I don't code in it much, but I'm still good enough to debug and fix issues with other people's projects, though I don't often start my own from-scratch operations anymore.

    So what do you want? Do you want a guy who knows your core operations like the back of his hand, and is decent or quick-to-learn on the other stuff? Perhaps you want the guy who knows a little bit of all those, but not much of any. Or maybe you'll just end up with the guy that *says* he knows a lot about these things, perhaps managed to fluff his way through the interview, and ends up doing more harm than good?

    I stand by keeping my resume honest, partly because I believe in that type of thing partly because I don't want to get a job I'll lose because I was never qualified in the first place (and my current job is decent, but I'm looking at a different location). I've had the opportunity to lie, I've had people want to hire me - for good pay , but without using my strong skills - and had to refuse because I knew there were better candidates. Jobs are un

    1. Re:The hiring pool sucks too by nahpets77 · · Score: 1

      Man did you ever hit the nail on the head. I often wonder who writes these requirements. Do they want a super C++ coder or a jack-of-all-trades? You can't be a super-duper expert in 30 things... if you were, you certainly wouldn't work for $50k a year. Imagine the following add:

      Job: Surgeon
      Required Skills: Must have experience performing heart and liver transplants, as well as brain surgery and hip replacement. Breast augmentation experience a plus.
      Salary: $50-75k

      Seriously, why don't people get that just like in medicine, to be really good at something, you need to specialize.

  101. Re:Theories vs Facts by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    Well the GP's first point was questioning supply and demand. THAT is incredibly well proven and if it wasn't there would be no stock market whatsoever. Thats all my point was, not that the entire thing is an exact science.

    We don't really know what makes gravity work either, but we're pretty sure its working.

  102. Hungarian Notation by hotsauce · · Score: 2, Insightful
    1. Re:Hungarian Notation by Surt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh. The discussion you reference is linking Joel on software. I send beginners there and ask: give me a list of all the things Joel is obviously wrong about. I keep the ones who are smart enough to come back and say: I don't want to spend that much time writing it all down.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Hungarian Notation by IainMH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Joel is opinionated. But he generally backs up his opinions with at least some argument.

      I wouldn't trust anyone who says "I don't want to write why he's wrong down". Esp. 'beginners'. Whatever you may think of him or what he says he's been doing this a long time. Most of the time what he says is at least worth listening to. What you do with that information from there is up to you.

      Typing is easy. Shaping an effective retort is not.

      Prove me wrong. Reply with five or more things that he's so obviously wrong about and why.

  103. the world market is irrational by vinn01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, the world market is irrational. It happens every couple of decades. If you intend to try to profit from the current financial irrationality, remember this:

    "The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent" - John Maynard Keynes.

    1. Re:the world market is irrational by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Yes, the world market is irrational. It happens every couple of decades I'm not sure it's irrational. It's just the way exponential functions work.

      By using debt as the basis for our monetary systems, worldwide, we are deliberately introducing non linearity. We're introducing multiple exponential functions. As if the markets weren't volatile enough in the first place.

      If you intend to try to profit from the current financial irrationality, remember this: Meh. I was stung when younger. All my investment decisions have a horizon of 15 years.
      --
      Deleted
  104. First thing we do, let's outsource all the lawyers by fizzup · · Score: 1

    I have always thought that the legal profession is ripe for outsourcing. Not so much at the corporate level, but at the retail level. Consolidation into a something like a LawMart, with outsourced legal advice for wills, conveyancing, divorce, personal injury, insurance claims, et cetera.

  105. Re: India. Outsource our health care problems by Stradivarius · · Score: 1

    Don't need the internet for that. For some surgeries, it's actually cheaper to fly to India, have the surgery and recovery period there, and fly back, than to have the same surgery in the US. This has been getting much more popular - Google "medical tourism". Popular among those without health insurance, not just the low-income.

    There can be quality-of-care advantages too (i.e. because costs are lower, there's not a rush to get you out of the hospital prematurely).

  106. Re: India. Outsource our health care problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A side note...my friends wife (both are from India and Muslims) is a pediatrician - a gold medalist from a top Indian University and completed the necessary courses/exams for practicing in US. She started working in a rural hospital near Allentown, PA. After a few months she found it difficult to continue - patients would demand to see an "American Doctor". It was very demoralizing. I know her well enough to say its not the language skills or interpersonal skills, but bias based on skin color.

    The above could be an isolated incident. But without some type of campaigning, I dont think the 'shrub' from rural Kansas will listen to the advice of an Indian doctor. And the propaganda from Healthcare Industry will be shrill - bordering on xenophobia.

  107. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new Indian overlords

  108. You forgot about Poland! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot about Poland !

    Those Polanders are good programoers too!

  109. Indian IT giants have been hiring here for ages... by cdw38 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off, companies like Wipro and Infosys have been recruiting at top U.S. engineering and computer science schools for a long time now. Secondly, isn't it obvious what will eventually happen? Everyone is so hung up about outsourcing, especially in information technology, but who cares, seriously? The standard of living in India is rapidly rising, prices are rising, the rupee is getting stronger, etc...there is actually a shortage of labor in India at this point (relative to its incredible level of economic growth over the past 5 or so years). These Indian firms have been creating jobs in the U.S. for a long, long time. It's the same deal with the auto industry - everyone is so hung on up the "big three" auto companies just because they are headquartered in America. When they cut jobs it gets more coverage than Paris Hilton gets when a paparazzi snaps a photo of her pantiless cooch after a night of hard partying at some glorious Hollywood club, but when Subaru builds a new plant in Indiana or Toyota adds jobs stateside no one cares. We live in a global economy - as long as we (as in the United States) can provide qualified, quality laborers (which is another story altogether, but at least the ball is in our court), we have the ability to stay on top throughout this age of globalization. Who cares if you work for an Indian IT firm from an office in Boston? It doesn't make any different to me if I'm working for Accenture or Infosys as long as I have a job.

  110. Do you ever think? by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

    "Similarly, salaries of IT professionals world-wide are projected to stagnate or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today."

    Everywhere I look there are tons of IT jobs. I think this might be wishful thinking. "Maybe if we say that wages are falling they'll accept less pay!"

  111. Re:Theories vs Facts by Seumas · · Score: 1

    "just a THEORY"

    People who say that immediately lose all credibility due to their inability to understand what a fucking THEORY actually is.

    For the record, THEORIES are essentially feasible and reasonable extrapolations based on a combination of FACTS that can be DEMONSTRATED and TESTED in a scientific manner.

    For instance, I can test the "theory" of gravity. I can not test the "theory" of an afterlife.

  112. Re:Theories vs Facts by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

    Your talking about scientific theory, but that isn't the only kind of theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory :

    "Theories exist not only in the so-called hard sciences, but in all fields of academic study, from philosophy to music to literature.

    In the humanities, theory is often used as an abbreviation for critical theory or literary theory."

    --
    Software Inventor
  113. Re: India. Outsource our health care problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And who are you going to sue when something goes wrong? The Indian or Chinese doctor? Good luck with that. It seems like you want cheap medical care without addressing the reasons it is so expensive in the US such as malpractice insurance and "Managed" care.

  114. Re:http://www.goatse.cx - Just wasting your modpoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they don't care, they already got their attention they so dearly...um...never got from their mommies?

  115. maybe we should all immigrate to India by hackingbear · · Score: 1
    I'm working on a software company here in the Silicon Valley. Last week, an Indian engineer, who is a key guy in the team, decided to quit and move back to India -- not because his h-1 visa was expired but because he figured he could have made more money after taking into the effects of the US income tax.

    Maybe he started a trend.

    1. Re:maybe we should all immigrate to India by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      You mean emigrate don't you? Seen from here,(I live in India) you'd be immigrating :D

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    2. Re:maybe we should all immigrate to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh... except India isn't hiring americans. If you're an american going to india for an IT job, your chances of them hiring you are small.... and don't say it isn't happening...

  116. Re: India. Outsource our health care problems by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

    And who are you going to sue when something goes wrong? The Indian or Chinese doctor? Good luck with that. It seems like you want cheap medical care without addressing the reasons it is so expensive in the US such as malpractice insurance and "Managed" care.

    Or you could do your due diligence up front and make sure the doctor is good before they operate so there is no need to sue afterwards

    I've read more then once that it's a small percentage of bad doctors who are responsible for most malpractice suits, but since it's other doctors that regulate doctors, these bad doctors don't get there license pulled. For example http://www.saynotocaps.org/newsarticles/Small%20Pe rcentage%20of%20Doctors.html and http://www.autodealerscam.org/pressroom/release.cf m?ID=1222

    Some doctors in the US are going to a cash only with a waiver of liability, so they no hassles with insurance companies and no giant malpractice insurance premiums, which dramatically reduces their costs so they can charge reasonable prices.

    --
    Software Inventor
  117. Re:large pool of qualified applicants in the marke by Rexdude · · Score: 1

    Let me shed some more light here. I'm Indian, sitting in my country, and currently work for a Fortune 100 American company that's outsourced work here. I've been into computers and programming from my school days, starting with Turbo Pascal on creaky school XTs running MSDOS 5 in the early 90s. Right from then on, I knew I wanted to write software for a living because I love coding and creating stuff. Back then, I innocently dreamt that all software companies were great places to work, filled with geniuses who made games like Doom, or packages like Corel Draw (this was 1994).
    Much later, I've grown older and wiser-to the fact that 90% of people (at least in India) are just in it for the money, or to land an H1B in the US-i.e. anything but an interest for the subject. Every place I've worked-I've found people who are totally unidimensional-they'll sit and learn Java, but will not show the slightest interest in the field of computers, or the world of IT in general. (If there are any Indians living in India, who've always been here, AND who read Slashdot regularly, I haven't seen any).
    Another common attitude here is-that programming is a kind of menial job and one should get out of it as soon as possible, and become a 'manager'.
    It's not uncommon to find people becoming 'team leaders' within 5 years and 'project managers' within 7.
    This is in stark contrast to my experience with US companies. In a previous job, for a US company that made medical imaging/archiving software, I was in awe of the guys who had written the software. One of them was the CTO of the company, and even he still wrote code.
    Perhaps because you guys have had computers as part of your culture for a much longer time than we have-there are people out there(even reading this right now, I bet) with over 20-30 years of experience who still love to code and are passionate about Unix or Linux or the open source movement or whatever. I have always found it a great pleasure working with American(and British) colleagues just for these reasons:
    1) Thorough, indepth knowledge and experience of the matter at hand. Not someone who just picked up 'Java for Dummies' and tried to bullshit his way through something, but someone who KNOWS his stuff. You won't find many Indians with 15 yrs of unix network programming experience here in India.
    2) Communication skills: While most Indians may not sound like Apu from the Simpsons, I've had trouble understanding some people here, and some of them have actually gone and worked on projects in the US! I pity whoever had to work with them without an interpreter.
    There have been times when I've had to interpret on behalf of someone over a teleconference.

    Unless people here start off with an actual aptitude and interest for computers rather than as a passport to settling abroad or earning big bucks, this situation will prevail.

    --
    "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  118. We manufacture lots of hambergers at Mickey D's! by NoBozo99 · · Score: 1

    And freetraders/supplysiders still manufacture plenty of bullshit here too!

    --
    I may not be a smart man, but I know what an inode is.
  119. 8 years??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How old are you? We've been outsourcing jobs for 30 years now, not 8, and in that time we have gone from the largest creditor nation to the largest debtor nation, with the lowest savings rate, the least amount of home equity, the largest governmental deficits, the largest balance of trade deficits, and etc.. We've swapped solid middle class jobs, blue collar and white collar, for mc service jobs with little to no benefits at reduced payscales. Socioeconomicists are saying now that the current youngest adults, generations y and z, will be the first generations since the US was founded that make less and will have less than the preceding generations, their parents and grand parents in other words, a net loss in other words.
    (yes, I know someone will chime in with their anecdotal exception, I am speaking in general terms now, so pedants need not apply)

    The only thing globalization has done is up the income of the top 1%, generally speaking. And they have a lot of people faked out that debt=assets for some bizarre reason, and they obviously believe it like some religious cult nonsense.

    Check the damn business headlines! Wake up! If their globalization schemes worked, we wouldn't be needing this past month's slew of central bank hyper inflationary interventions, now would we? Well, would we? Why did they do that, if it wasn't necessary? Could it be they screwed the pooch and are in desperate straits now and are doing the only thing they know how to do since they forked the economy, and that is run the printing presses 24/7?

    Here's a deflating cyber quarter, buy a reality clue with it and learn the difference between a carnival barker's shill and real economic data..

  120. What? No Soviet Russia jokes? by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    What is wrong with you guys?

    --
    So say we all
  121. They need real programmers! by mysterious_mark · · Score: 1

    Spent seven months once me ( and a team of US coders) fixing an application WIPRO did for a major US client. There were suppossed to do a Struts application, but instead they wrote essentially a CGI script in Java, biggest mess I've ever seen! They really had no idea what they were doing, code was unbelievably sloppy, so maybe they need to hire some real programmers from the US to get anything done. M

  122. I don't think that's accurate by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    > It doesn't help too that many Americans view things like health care as their God-given right.

    I think you have it backwards, America is about the last nation on earth that doesn't have universal health care.

    > Many people don't want to even pay for their own health care.

    Nobody wants to pay for their own anything.

    > They foist those costs onto their employers

    Unless you work for the military, or something, you pay for most of your own healthcare. Employers do not pay a large % of most people's healthcare.

  123. They're just justifying an H!B! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Don't even bother applying for the jobs with that kind of requirement list. It's all just BS. They know who they're going to hire and are going through motions.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  124. bullshit by m2943 · · Score: 1

    H1B's don't require any justification or job postings.

    1. Re:bullshit by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      H1B requires they attempt to locate an American to fill the job before giving it to a an immigrant.

      They routinely go through the motions with the intent of not finding anyone.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:bullshit by m2943 · · Score: 1

      H1B requires they attempt to locate an American to fill the job before giving it to a an immigrant.

      That sentence makes no sense. H1B visas are non-immigrant visas; filling an H1B visa means filling a position with a temporary foreign worker. Positions filled with H1B visas do not require job postings.

      H1B visas are awarded for specialty occupations, as determined by the US government. The reason so computer programmers can come in on H1B visas is because the US government has determined that there is a shortage in that area. If you don't want any more H1B visas for computer programmers, the US government could simply declare tomorrow that there are enough US programmers.

      They routinely go through the motions with the intent of not finding anyone.

      Green cards are immigrant visas and require job postings in some cases. And, of course, green-card related job postings are made with the expectation that no US candidate will qualify. There is nothing nefarious about that: if the company were able to fill that position with a US worker, they wouldn't go through the trouble and expense of starting the green card process in the first place! But, again, none of that has anything to do with H1B visas because there are no job posting requirements for H1B visas.

      Before you attempt to participate in the immigration debate, you really should get your facts straight and try to understand the basics of the immigration system.

    3. Re:bullshit by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Before you attempt to participate in the immigration debate, you really should get your facts straight and try to understand the basics of the immigration system.

      LOL

      Wiki article on H1B

      You'll find a direct refutation of your point in the 'H1B dependent employers' section. Even those that aren't required to show a search are required to declare that they looked but couldn't find someone qualified.

      I'm waiting to see you post apologizing for being an arrogant bonehead. I expect I'll be waiting a long time.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  125. step forth with confidence by zoftie · · Score: 1

    ..."world-wide are projected to stagnate or possibly fall due to the large pool of qualified applicants in the market today"...

    There is problem in paying too much heed to this. for reasons:
    1. If you requalify yourself into solutions builder, you can most of the time compete with foreign workforce due to communications quality.
    2. In general it is bad business to be an employee, as your fixed wage is seen as cost to the business and not an investment, and is something to be reduced and an opportune moment.
    3. Staying flexible, with an eye open to doing things your own way is always better.

    Smart and flexible people and thats coders always made more money. Larger corporations typically pay well, but first ones to ditch the expensive workforce, because of size of percieved savings. So don't be loyal to IBM, Oracle or Intel. Smaller companies may be better about it, but still business is a business. You must give business something in return for money. ie. be useful to the bottom line.

    Unfortunately companies don't practice profit sharing, so it is tough to asess the importance of your work, to the company in terms of your results and output from them in terms of cash. And there is no better way to motivate people then condition them that they will get paid more if they work harder.

    2c

  126. Re:I'm a consultant and he's right! - Mod parent u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wealthy get rich on the backs of the poor, but seldom do the wealthy suffer as acutely. They just take their money elsewhere and exploit another group of poor. Question is, where will they go in a global market where most poor are already exploited?

  127. That's all well and good for the blind by Rix · · Score: 1

    But for the rest of us, there are far better solutions.

  128. Hungarian notation is bad for humans by Rix · · Score: 1

    On any project of sufficient size, hungarian notation will become outdated. And it's just fucking hard to read.

    Good programmers know this intuitively, so it makes a good interview question. I thank people for their time if they say anything positive about it.

    1. Re:Hungarian notation is bad for humans by Heembo · · Score: 1

      right, so you prefer a large enterprise system with minimal variable names that really don't capture the context/meaning of the variable in the first place. bah

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  129. That seems perfectly fair to me by Rix · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't those willing to improve themselves be treated better than those who aren't?

  130. I've got your word of the day by Rix · · Score: 1
  131. random line noise does not capture meaning by Rix · · Score: 1

    I prefer variable names that describe the *purpose* not the container.

    1. Re:random line noise does not capture meaning by Heembo · · Score: 1

      I prefer variable names that verbosely describe purpose, scope and type.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  132. You have got it wrong. by holygoat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're avoiding all of the dubious benefits of Hungarian notation -- capturing semantic information that isn't provided by your environment -- whilst hitting its main problem head-on.

    What happens if you change the type of iNumEmps to long, or long long? You'd better hope you remember to change all of the relevant variable names throughout your code.

    What you do offers you no benefits, but increases your maintenance burden. Stop doing it.

  133. That's surreal by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    Thank y'all, come again, ..... now, y'hear?

    I don't think Squishees taste quite right in peach and pecan flavors, or chewing tobacco, either...

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  134. we dont hate you, we laught you by wwmedia · · Score: 1

    we dont hate you, we laught you

  135. Free Markets/Globalization by jawahar · · Score: 1

    Globalization sounds rational only when wage slavery is prevented in developing nations.

  136. "A strange game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?"
    - Joshua

  137. Hungarian notation does not do that by Rix · · Score: 1

    It adds random characters which may or may not correspond to what the scope and type were at one point in time. Those random characters do not necessarily conform to any standard, so you have to go find the coder who added them and ask what they mean, rather than just looking at the declaration.

    1. Re:Hungarian notation does not do that by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's only 2 letters before you variable name. And if your engineers are not keeping up with 2 simple things - type and scope - they you have shoddy coders anyhow. So normally you name your variable "numberOfTiles" say. Now with Hungarian you add 2 characters - ad "i" for integer and a "c" for class level variable say, so the Hungarian notation for this variable is icNumberOfTiles. Again, if your engineers cannot keep up with this, then you are not engineering.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    2. Re:Hungarian notation does not do that by Rix · · Score: 1

      Good coders don't use hungarian notation to start with, so we know from the get go that it's only being done by the below par ones.

    3. Re:Hungarian notation does not do that by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Right, you and your good coders and use some obscure minimalist form. Me and my great coders will continue using Hungarian. I admit, as a system changes over time, you must update the variable names as variables change context. If you do not do that, then you have a case where variables names lie, and that even worse than minimalist naming conventions. And since there are no good "Hungarian notation checkers" its up to humans to engineering code correctly. You need to be great to do this, good will not suffice.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  138. RTFA by m2943 · · Score: 1
    The Wikipedia article is correct and confirms what I'm saying:

    As the rules are written, there is no requirement that an American be sought to fill a position, nor given preference in layoffs unless the company is "H-1B dependent", i.e. 15 percent or more of its global workforce consists of H-1Bs earning less than $60,000 per year, exempting those who hold masters degrees. Only about one percent of H-1B employers are deemed "H-1B dependent," and even then the employer is only required to "attest" that he was not able to find an American.

    Your statement that "They're just justifying an H!B!" is and remains bullshit: employers don't make job postings in order to "justify" an H1B because nobody ever actually asks for such a justification; as the Wikipedia article tells you, all the US government ever wants is an attestation.
  139. We've already established... by Rix · · Score: 1

    That you are a subpar coder. I know it's hard for you, but try to keep up.

    There are no hungarian notation checkers because tool users can get all the information hungarian notation aims to transmit in better, more accurate, ways. Hungarian notation is a very ugly solution in search of a problem.

    1. Re:We've already established... by Heembo · · Score: 1

      This is just a holy way. VI/EMACS, APPLES/ORANGES, I use Hungarian/you are an asshole.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  140. Nope by Rix · · Score: 1

    If I use vi and you use emacs, we can collaberate without any troubles. If I write nice, standardized code and you write garbage, I have to fire you.

    1. Re:Nope by Heembo · · Score: 1

      You can easily write standardized clean code with Hungarian. And, I only use Hungarian if my client is in agreement. But still, even if I write messy code, you are still an asshole.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  141. No, I think it's universal. by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1
    I'm assuming that we're of the same age, I'm 23. I'm in college here in USA (I know, my age, I graduated at 19 and took 2 years off after high school to manage a McDonalds and got out when someone said 'Imagine, this could all be *yours* some day!') for software development. The situation is *precisely* the same.


    I rarely can find someone that I would call my peer. I'm not saying that I'm better than them or anything, but while they're out partying, I'm writing code. There are few people in this field that have a genuine passion for it - and less who have the passion/skill combination. I got started with BASIC on a C64 and VIC20 that I got from a cousin, and then went to QBASIC on a 386 an uncle gave me. The thing had like 4 megs of EDO RAM and was running Windows 3.1. I used to have to make boot disks, playing with HIMEM, to play my favorite games so that I'd have enough memory. Doom needed to be 'clean booted' by holding down the left shift key right after POST. I still have the AT Keytronic keyboard that he gave me with it, and to this day it's still my favorite. I wish they still made 'clickies'.


    I'm not sure if it's cultural that over in India people want to be in management, but I know that in the USA, the people who want to be in management usually get there since there is little competition from the geeks who just want to write code. I'd suck as a manager for lack of passion - I have the ability to lead, but passion is worth ability ten times over.

    I think software development is one of those jobs where the best advice you can give someone entering the field is, "If you can picture yourself doing anything else at all, you should go do that instead." Unfortunately, no one ever tells this to freshmen with dollar signs obscuring their vision. Which is nice, as it makes the alpha geeks look all that much better, and they offer us an obscene amount of money to do what we would be doing for free in our spare time, regardless. This allows us to continue to do what we do without ever having to get a 'day job', other than the 8 hours where we get to play on the toys that someone else chooses for us.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:No, I think it's universal. by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      I'm actually 29 :)
      What you heard was a rant after spending 5 years in this industry. One thing I've learnt early on is 'Find something you like, then figure out a way to get paid to do that.'-similar to what you've said.
      I'm probably one of the very few people here who did a full time MBA and chucked it over in favor of writing code because that's what i like doing. (Not to mention that Dilbertisms in real life are not funny).I think it's a generational thing. The Americans I mentioned, who I enjoyed working with-all without exception were a minimum of 35 years old. I'd say they took their first steps in the early 80s when there was no internet and computers were so hard to use that only geeks who really loved tinkering would want to work with them. Here, the computer boom began only around 2000 with the Y2K bug requiring people in droves to fix it; so there is no one in India of that age or experience.

      Also-I could be wrong-but I've seen the general trend of looking down on kids who do well in academics (the geek/nerd stereotype) seems more prevalent over there. Here in India(especially south India) we have a strong tradition of doing well in studies, and many Indians feel education is the most valuable thing they can give their children.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  142. Chances are.. by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    if going gets tough in one place, you can just move to another place.

    Only if you are single and don't have kids.
    The answer lies in the initial question you posted:

    Would you really recommend IT to school kids evaulating future careers... Chances are that school kids who are interested in technology (especially programming) will be spending the majority of their lives this way... Sincerely, 23 year old single geek programmer. Not bitter, really.
    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.