Slashdot Mirror


A Brief History of Slashdot Part 1, Chips & Dips

As part of our 10 year anniversary celebration, I've decided to post a story here telling the tale of the transition from Chips & Dips to Slashdot back in 1997. For those of you who are new here (cough), CnD was the precursor to Slashdot, hosted on my personal homepage on the CompSci cluster of Hope College. Along with a number of random Linux related webpages, themes for window managers, random bits of code I wrote, this page was read by a great number of folks, mostly from the IRC scene. Hit the link below to read the tale of its transformation into an Internet superstar (and maybe later I'll write the the sequel where I talk of the transformation into sellout mega corporate evil and eventually irrelevant blemish on the history of the net ;) And don't forget to check for a Slashdot 10 year anniversary party in your area.

In the summer of 1997 I was contacted by a stranger out of the blue with a kind of random offer. During the previous school year Nate Oostendorp (who now works with SourceForge, Inc. while working on his Masters) had coded a Space Invaders clone. He wrote a Java sprite library, and I wrote the game and illustrated the alien armada. This guy had an old DEC Alpha Multia 166, and a client that wanted to remake the game with popcorn instead of aliens. So I drew the popcorn up, replaced the gifs, and he mailed me my first non x86 box since the 286 I got in middle school. (Later Sun sent me legal threats forcing me to take the game offline since it was called Java Invaders, and clearly this was an evil crime against the universe. My hatred for Java has never died since that moment.)

I immediately installed Red Hat on it. I was working at an ad agency called The Image Group at the time as a webmaster. I coded whatever needed doing and handled various admin tasks to keep their clients happy. At the time they needed full control over email addresses on the domains they built. Since they shared their mailserver with their ISP, there were frequent name collisions -- if the client wanted bob@theirdomain.com but there already was a bob on the system, they couldn't do it. They agreed to let me move my little Alpha onto their network to host their email... and I could use it to fart around with on my personal hobbies.

I named the box Ariel. It sat under my desk. I learned enough Perl to write a stupid simple CMS to replace the functionality of Chips & Dips, which up until that point was just a text file. Dave DeMaagd wrote a simple comment system. Since we both had a long history with BBSes, it seemed obvious to us that there needed to be a discussion system. There were no user accounts -- you entered whatever name you wanted each time you posted. If you left it blank, it auto-filled the space with the name 'Anonymous Coward', a title that stuck and spread throughout the net.

The original system was written in Perl because I wanted to learn more Perl. All the data storage was flat text files. (We lost most of the original stories during a data import a year or so later) The files were named like 0000001.shtml and so forth and were all rendered at time of page request. Best of all, since the system was written as a CGI, the whole script needed to be compiled every time there was a page request. It was months before I ported the whole thing to use MySQL and mod_Perl.

I registered the domain name Slashdot.org as a joke. It was 'org' because I didn't want a .com -- those were so common. I always thought org would be cooler, and besides, I had no commercial plans in mind. (Years later this bit me on the ass since someone else registered the .com. Doh!) The URL was meant to be unpronounceable by anyone -- a joke ultimately that has backfired on me countless times when I'm called and asked what the URL is to the damn thing. Jeff 'Hemos' Bates (now a VP of something or other with SourceForge, Inc.) was in the living room when I was registering the domain name. We all wanted email addresses with a unique domain name that wasn't attached to our school, so he chipped in on the registration fee.

When it came time to design the website's look, I took elements from a theme we had designed at The Image Group -- Paul Hart and I spent hours on it -- that was supposed to be the new website for the company, but it was passed on for another look. I still liked it, so I redesigned it more to my personal aesthetics (choosing #006666 as the dominant green replacing an earth tone green) and putting drop shadows all over everything (a habit I still haven't broken, and for which I am still mocked). Within days, most of the design elements you see on Slashdot were in place... the curves, the greens, the polls, the vertical list of stories so common in 2007, and, of course, discussions on each story.

And Slashdot was born. At first it had just a few thousand daily readers migrating over from Chips & Dips, but in a matter of weeks it had grown so fast that we started really having fun with it. One night we put up a poll asking how many shots Kurt 'The Pope' DeMaagd should drink. (Kurt later became our defacto HR man when we formed Blockstackers... today he is a professor at MSU.) But that night, Slashdot readers told him to take a dozen shots of alcohol -- he failed, but he tried.

I remember around the same time just watching 'tail -f' on the access_log. My world was rocked over and over again as I watched the domain names... mit.com! ibm.com! redhat.com! Hell, even microsoft.com kept scrolling through the log. I knew we had something... people from around the world, from the highest institutions in the land, from the biggest companies in the tech sector and to the most influential in the Linux world were all reading Slashdot. In fact, they were posting comments... as were a lot of people. It became commonplace to see hundreds of comments on stories, and the so-called 'Slashdot Effect' slowly grew into our lexicon as site after site buckled under our links.

In those days the content was a lot more personal then it is today. Stories would frequently refer to alcohol-related activities. I'd constantly mention that I had to leave to go to class so there wouldn't be more stories posted for a few hours. And when a professor in my pottery class assigned homework of to mass produce and sell some pottery as a lesson in being a commercial artist, I posted it, and ended up getting over 100 requests to buy my shitty mugs (all glazed teal ;) In the end I never did sell them -- I fulfilled the assignment locally. I think I still have one of those mugs left but I'm not sure- over the years my mediocre ceramics have been filtered out of a home increasingly tastefully decorated by my wife.

I continued to go to class and work my part time job. Ariel soon had loads so great that the machine was unusable during the day. And occasionally I would accidentally kick it and knock out a cable, bringing the machine offline. Soon after it saturated the office T1, I started realizing that there was no way I was going to be able to do this as "Just" a hobby. Essentially, every second of my life was consumed without time for a break. I'd go to class -- and often just work on Slashdot in the back row. (This was the first year we had computers at our desks in the CS dept at Hope.) My classwork suffered. On the upside, I became far more proficient at webwork, which really helped the part time job. I'd go home and code, post stories, reply to email until 2-3 a.m. and repeat it the next day. It was going to eventually be a full time job, requiring revenue and infrastructure that didn't exist back then. But I guess that's another story.

503 comments

  1. I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'Cause CnD was a top-hit on AltaVista for "WindowMaker" and "Enlightenment".

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:I was there by runenfool · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How can you even remember that long ago? I haven't the slighted recollection on how I ended up at slashdot ... funny Im here ten years later :)

      Strangely enough I think the fact that it was a weird name (with no www, nonetheless) that kept me here ... made it easier to remember. The good ole days of working phone tech support, making no money, but surfing the web and sitting on slashdot all day ...

    2. Re:I was there by NeoTron · · Score: 1

      I wasn't there, but, I did register with /. relatively early on in its history, and have been reading it ever since.

      To the Anonymous Cowards who posted "Nobody Cares" , well actually I *do* care.

      Regards.

    3. Re:I was there by crayz · · Score: 1

      I was never there for Chips & Dips, but wasn't there a time Slashdot existed before the current user scheme?

    4. Re:I was there by bigredradio · · Score: 1

      Your ID is 137. Holy crap batman. Props to you dude.

    5. Re:I was there by Erich · · Score: 1

      I, too, started reading slashdot whilst doing phone tech support, the summer before and Christmas break of my Freshman year at College.

      --

      -- Erich

      Slashdot reader since 1997

    6. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      WindowMaker and Enlightenment

      I still use the wallpapers from Rob's 2001-inspired, "Obsidian" theme.

      Do you remember when building Enlightenment required the X-Free tools and xmkmf

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:I was there by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Same here - no recollection of how, when, or why I ended up on Slashdot. I know it was no later than '99, possibly '98. Never heard of Chips and Dip. Apparently I held off on registering an account.

      Maybe if someone posted the most common Slashdot memes and when they arose, like Natalie Portman and grits, I could have a better idea of when I started visiting.

    8. Re:I was there by cblack · · Score: 1

      I remember that theme, the all black with beveled borders icons, etc. I must have it somewhere in my home directory but I haven't used enlightenment for quite awhile.

    9. Re:I was there by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      How about a couple of your early posts?

      1:

      Does this violate Starbuck, the first mate?
      (Score:1)
      by stuntpope (19736) on 12:30 18th March, 1999 (#1974348)
      Didn't read any classics in high school, eh? Starbuck is the first mate in the novel "Moby Dick", written long before the coffee chain popped up everywhere. I think Starbucks the coffee company might have a hard time if they wanted to get annoyed at RH over this.


      2

      Best gag of the show
      (Score:1)
      by stuntpope (19736) on 18:08 29th March, 1999 (#1957783)
      Yeah, that was funny and easy to miss. My fave was when all 3 main characters were together, and Bender says, "this calls for a drink", procedes to pull 3 bottles out of his chest, and instead of handing out bottles, drinks them all himself!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    10. Re:I was there by Enry · · Score: 1

      Friend of mine pointed me here. 10 years. Wow.

    11. Re:I was there by Otter · · Score: 1
      Like most of the early Mac crowd here, I came over via MacOS Rumors, back when Ryan Meader and Black Light Media ran Slashdot's advertising.

      I think Taco and Hemos would up getting a lot richer than Ryan did, though.

      CnD was a top-hit on AltaVista for "WindowMaker" and "Enlightenment".

      Ironically, Enlightenment probably is less functional today than it was then.

    12. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Wow. Do you still have "Surgical A-440"

      It was - like all of them - and "alpha" theme. It tried an intriguing optical-illusion, where the window frames looked like depressions carved into a plate of steel. I'd like to find those bitmaps...

      Like many themes of the day, there was a fascination for using a rendered skull, for the window "kill" button.

      In those days, xkill was in my dock!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    13. Re:I was there by mikael · · Score: 1

      Wow, how many others of the three digit crowd are still around?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. Adding COMMENTS was an innovation, at one point.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    15. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      Back in the day, I was TERRIFIED that I wouldn't get my name in a site registry, or a webmail system. The Internet was small enough you could register almost everywhere "important".

      I'm 167 on Technocrat.net. Same disease. :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    16. Re:I was there by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      I think there's still quite a few of us early users still around...

    17. Re:I was there by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Enlightenment DR16 is very stable and mature now (as it better be), and .17 should be out of pre-alpha by the time Duke Nukem Forever runs on Linux.

      --
      Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
    18. Re:I was there by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I think I wound up here via Declan McCullagh's fight-censorship mailing list, but I won't swear to it.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    19. Re:I was there by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      Me too -- I heard about this site from a couple of my fellow slaves in the Verizon Call Center Salt Mines in sunny Buffalo. What a shit job that was.

      --saint

    20. Re:I was there by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 4, Funny

      In those days, xkill was in my dock!

      Remember Netscape 4.x? xkill was in EVERYBODY'S dock, and it got used daily.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    21. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hourly... ;-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    22. Re:I was there by cooley · · Score: 1

      I, too, started reading slashdot whilst doing phone tech support, the summer before and Christmas break of my Freshman year at College. Same here; in 1997 I had taken a University tech support job (because I figured I.T. would *eventually* pay better than pizza delivery) after I dropped out of school in '96, and sat at my desk reading Slashdot during the slow times.

      It took me a long time to create an account here, though; in '94 or '95 I had created an account at vip.hotwired.com and it really didn't *give* me anything; eventually, that subdomain just pointed to www.hotwired.com (and eventually www.wired.com).

      "Burned" by that experience, I didn't see why creating a Slashdot account would be a useful thing. I could read stories and post without an account. Eventually, I think I created an account because I wanted to save my preference to browse at -1, or something like that. I don't really remember.
      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    23. Re:I was there by Khan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it was '98 for me. I had just started using Linux and someone mentioned I should checkout a website called "slash-dot." Needless to say, if I ever remember who the bastard was that pointed me here, I'll make him PAY for nine years of website addiction! "KHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNN!!!!"

      --

      "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

    24. Re:I was there by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      no kidding - it's fucking amazing to see all of these low IDs posting. half of the time, when I decide to comment on something and end up dropping a flamebait response, i feel like i'm some sort of antediluvian emerging from my crypt to sow a little chaos before going beddie-bye again. Now i'm like some n00b cowering under the weight of everyone else's experience. it's really cool.

      I don't remember anything about CnD, and I can't remember what led me to slashdot, either. probably something to do with linux, as I suspect I signed on when I was one of those bozos who was happy to run Yggdrasil or redhat 4.3 on my little 486sx, much to my ex-wife's chagrin (who wanted a computer that she could figure out how to work). damn. I must've been working at that stupid trucking company, too. the only IT guy in a company that had never had one before... *reminisces* hahaha, odd how things have come back around again - once again the only IT guy in a little company, and all that...

      ugh, this is what Alzheimer's is like, people. fear growing old ;)

    25. Re:I was there by ximenes · · Score: 1

      Yep, me too. I seem to recall I contributed a RPM to Red Hat 3.0.3 of ePlus back when computers were actually interesting.

    26. Re:I was there by alta · · Score: 1

      What was the URL back then, I want to check it out on archive.org...

      And I though my 4 digit UID was impressive, all hail your 3 Digit one.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    27. Re:I was there by torpor · · Score: 1

      Its true! I remember also being amused about CnD's enlightenment hits at altavitsa .. I also remember it being a pretty active pro-Java site in the beginning too, and for me it was a good place to come to find interesting Java 1.0-related stories .. my how things have changed (I don't do Java any more..)

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    28. Re:I was there by torpor · · Score: 1

      /raises hand. Been a long, stormy journey.

      I often wonder myself, what it would be like, to meet some of the earlier slashdot adopters in person ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    29. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Heh! I showed up in a bundle of WM themes on RH5. Didn't notice for months...

      Cool days.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    30. Re:I was there by Wheely · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well over a thousand I should think.

    31. Re:I was there by J4 · · Score: 1

      Add one more. It woulda been lower, but I waited till Bruce Perens said it was OK ;)

    32. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent funny :)

    33. Re:I was there by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      I was never there for Chips & Dips, but wasn't there a time Slashdot existed before the current user scheme?


      The article mentions that in the initial implementation of the comment system, users simply entered their chosen display names, with no registration.
    34. Re:I was there by J4 · · Score: 1

      And yet JWZ was still a rockstar (not like now :P)

    35. Re:I was there by Linux_Bastard · · Score: 1

      BINGO!!!

      At the beginning I didn't see any point to an account. I never created an account until I needed to change the preferences. I bet thats true of a lot of the 200K people.

      If the ad's ever get ahead of my adblocking I'll probably pay for one.

      --
      F X=0:1:9999 F D=2:1 Q:((X>2)&(X#D=0)!((D>X/2)&(X'=1))) I D>(X/2) W:$X>75 ! W X,?$X+5-$l(X) Q
    36. Re:I was there by ender- · · Score: 1

      Same here - no recollection of how, when, or why I ended up on Slashdot. I know it was no later than '99, possibly '98. Never heard of Chips and Dip. Apparently I held off on registering an account. I'm pretty sure you signed up in 1998. I did some research and found a post from Feb 2, 1999 that was a user with a 90,000ish ID. So I'm pretty sure I [and obviously you] signed up in 1998. We mustn't have waited too long because the information I found suggested that user accounts were only started in August of 1998 or so. [Is this true or is my research bogus?]

      As with many, I had been reading Slashdot before the user accounts existed. Wish I hadn't waited to create mine. As a result, I now tend to sign up for accounts wherever I can, just in case. :)

    37. Re:I was there by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      Blah, I signed on a looong time ago but with my college email account. Never made a post on it however. Being the paranoid guy I was back then, I used some obscure username and password that I have easily forgotten. I kept it in my school email however. By the time I graduated ('99) my account was closed and I lost access to pine, thereby losing all my info :-(

      Now that I think about it, I may have at one point copied over my mailbox on my zip drive. I remember it being over 4 megs! back when I had a 5 meg school quota.

      Stupid obscure passwords! I did that crap with my ICQ accounts too, back when I cared more about chatting with my back-then girlfriend than my 5 digit ICQ number - but now I know better. I should have written down those passwords on post-its, curse my lack of foresight!

    38. Re:I was there by pjwhite · · Score: 0

      More like 900 if you're talking about three digits (unless you add leading zeroes to the lower numbers).

    39. Re:I was there by Clete2 · · Score: 1

      So which day is /.'s 10th? Nice history, by the way. Happy 10th!

    40. Re:I was there by neccoant · · Score: 1

      Yeah ditto. Poor MOSR.

    41. Re:I was there by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always find the UID discussion funny. Most people with UID's in the 2-4 digit range started reading slashdot early enough to remember there weren't any at the start. I personally only signed up for a named account after the atrocity that was John Katz when they added the feature to block certain authors.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    42. Re:I was there by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      Might I say, an excellent reason to sign up!

    43. Re:I was there by Alex · · Score: 1

      there are more than a few of us about......

    44. Re:I was there by Wansu · · Score: 1


        Wow, how many others of the three digit crowd are still around?

      I'm still hangin' in there like a hair on a biscuit.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    45. Re:I was there by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Wow, how many others of the three digit crowd are still around? Quite a few I would guess. No more than 999, anyway. :^) We should form a group at Meetup.com.
    46. Re:I was there by Adam+Hazzlebank · · Score: 1

      I didn't think Technocrat had ID numbers. At least not ones that are shown on posts.

    47. Re:I was there by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Funny

      At the beginning I didn't see any point to an account. I never created an account until I needed to change the preferences. I bet thats true of a lot of the 200K people.

      I think so too. By rights, all 300K of us should have 3-digit UIDs.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    48. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Gads! They're GONE! I didn't notice that when they stripped-down the UI, these went too! When it was a straight Slashcode site (minus karma and stuff) you saw your ID on ~ .

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    49. Re:I was there by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I was almost there. Physically, that is. I worked at Hope in the Computing and Information Technology dept until the spring of 1997. Good thing Rob wasn't trying to run his little message board over the campus internet connection; we would've shut the bandwidth-wasting punk down. {stern stare}

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    50. Re:I was there by gmrath · · Score: 1

      As a long time reader (and almost everyday reader -- wastes lots of time at work on this website), and a very seldom, if ever, poster, I salute Slashdot's tenth anniversary. Thanks, Slashdot. In reading Slashdot I am at once amused, bemused, and confused, but always entertained and informed by some, most, or all posts; oh, but always entertained. By the way, in true /. tradition. I rarely read the Story.

      Early on, I vividly remember one enlightening post (goes something to the effect) " where else but Slashdot could you follow a serious, informative and authoritative discourse between two people named 'Moofie' and 'Asshat.'" And I agree.

      Like many posters here today, I didn't register for some time after beginning reading. Pity. Merely a 6-digit midget. I became interested in computing on meeting the IBM 1320 or 1620 or what ever the hell that thing in the basement at College was that they actually allowed me to lay hands upon (DO NOT ever touch that RED BUTTON unless you ACTUALLY SEE FLAMES, not smoke, Dammit, FLAMES!). Computers became a hobby during the days of wire wrapping, meter reading, and head scratching - those days are long gone, of course, giving way to the same kinds of things only on a more complex, microscopic, surface mount, buy-it-and-assemble-it level.

      I also remember "back in the day" folks, when they were short cash for a house payment, car payment, whatever payment, would pull out a 15K memory board or power supply from their home brew S100-bus stuff and sell it at the local computer club, knowing they would be able to by something similar or better back some day when someone else needed a . . . house payment. . . Damn, how some things change. Ah, but the old canard: The more things change, the more they stay the same . . . including the quality of the posts on Slashdot. My favorite WEB 2.0 social network. Hey, if there's a party in the south suburban Chicago area, what the Hell, I'll go. . .

      Thanks, Slashdot.

    51. Re:I was there by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      The UIDs were not displayed here on Slashdot for a long time. It only became 'necessary' when people started masquerading as other users. The 'fake Bruce Perens' incident was the most blatant example.

      'Blatant UID display' is actually a negative thing. It hearkens back to those little BBSes where all the dinky kids had to establish their 'cred' somehow.

      I remember an Apple II board back in the day where, since I was a hardware person, I was asked to repair the keyboard (the BBS ran on an Apple IIc.) Because of this I was 'granted' sysop privileges**. It was one of those 'Role Playing' BBSes. I soon thereafter 're-rolled' the board and never dared log on again. My solder job on the keyboard survived, though. I guess.

      There are a LOT of us who were 'online' with BBSes for a long time before broad and common access to the Internet wiped out that scene.

      (** My board at the time was a WWIV (version 3.21d which was distributed only as pascal source code so you needed to run Turbo Pascal 3.0 to roll your own binaries) and ran on an 8088 machine with a 5 meg hard drive.)

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    52. Re:I was there by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      and can we play /. uid limbo now?? (staff members excluded)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    53. Re:I was there by bingoathome · · Score: 1

      I am certain it has to be less than 999 - not that it matters - I have been reading /. since the early 1800's - but I wanted UID I have - it took some waiting Im telling you

    54. Re:I was there by palndrumm · · Score: 1

      No more than 999

      No more than 900, even - UIDs 1 to 99 wouldn't technically be part of the 3-digit crowd...
    55. Re:I was there by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      So I shouldn't clear my calendar, then?

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    56. Re:I was there by Erich · · Score: 1
      John Katz was the main reason you can customize the main page to ban articles from certain posters.


      That, and I seem to remember a flaming political rant from Hemos.

      --

      -- Erich

      Slashdot reader since 1997

    57. Re:I was there by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      I'm 167 on Technocrat.net. Same disease. :-)


      Technocrat re-rolled a while back. The old numbers went away.
    58. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Props, my friend. From a guy who cut teeth on Some unknown Honeywell 'frame, and went to PDP 11/60's...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    59. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I just noticed! Is it even Slash under there? They added TinyMCE-style editing.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    60. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      ASC][ Express!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    61. Re:I was there by J-F+Mammet · · Score: 1

      Reporting for duty!

    62. Re:I was there by fredm8 · · Score: 1

      CnD I remember not.

      It was early-98 I first hit /. and liked what I found.
      Now I've had to grow up and were a suit & sell sh!t ....

      But I do remember posting the first postY2K submission on Slashdot.

      Douglas

      P.S. Keep /. going, its read daily down-under, from the land of the long white cloud

    63. Re:I was there by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      "Needless to say, if I ever remember who the bastard was that pointed me here, I'll make him PAY for nine years of website addiction! "

      Aren't you glad it was slashdot and not goatse?

      --
      C|N>K
    64. Re:I was there by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Well, Enlightenment DR16 is very stable and mature now (as it better be), and .17 should be out of pre-alpha by the time Duke Nukem Forever runs on Linux. "YDL" comes with E17 on Sony PS3 and PPC as default window manager.

      http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/ydl/

      Classy selection from Terra Soft ;) If it is still branded "alpha" while it can run on PS3 with 256M RAM, it doesn't deserve it IMHO.

    65. Re:I was there by Selivanow · · Score: 1

      Just look at all of these old foggies comming out of the woodwork :)

      --
      -- ...trying to make digital files uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet. -Bruce Schneier
    66. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet you're the life of the party...

    67. Re:I was there by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      WARNING: Parent post was not controversial enough to post a witty reply.

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    68. Re:I was there by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Always wore the suit, mate! Sometimes it's bottle-green corduroy. ;-)

      Last year I broke down, and quit doing things. I sell sh*t too.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    69. Re:I was there by tamyrlin · · Score: 1

      I have a keyboard shortcut in my fvwmrc which have been changed from "killall -9 netscape-communicator" in the first incarnation to "killall -9 firefox-bin" in the latest version. Although it isn't used very much nowadays... Wow, things are better now than before :)

    70. Re:I was there by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The one feature of Slashdot that made me register, and the lack of which makes me not bother to register elsewhere, is a notification when someone replies to your posts. The fact registered users get (or can choose to get) a notification when there is a reply means that the discussion system is actually a discussion, rather than just a load of people spouting opinions.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    71. Re:I was there by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for proving that not R'ing TFA is not an innovation of the newer readers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    72. Re:I was there by Sanat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Still here too. I imagine there are lots of old timers who read and lurk here rather than posting all that much. Seems that what i have to say any more is less important even to me, so instead I enjoy the insight and the varied positions of the various posters on Slashdot.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    73. Re:I was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they could read goatse for nine years they're some kind of a god. I could only manage two and a half years.

    74. Re:I was there by JoshG · · Score: 1

      IIRC the first time I found CnD was looking for an Afterstep theme or config file. Might have been WM though; hard to believe it's been ten years. Just wish I hadn't waited around so I could have gotten one of the Duckpins or something along those lines? I remember downloading it over my whopping 33.6 and it seeming to take forever at the time.

    75. Re:I was there by l0cust · · Score: 1

      Thats has to be the funniest comment I have read in a while.

      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
    76. Re:I was there by ZarkDav · · Score: 1

      So true! I also came to this page while searching for info about WindowMaker via AltaVista!

    77. Re:I was there by hoover · · Score: 1

      I remember the times when nearly all x11 related programs came with makemakefiles. Old fart, I guess ;-)

      --
      Ever wondered whats wrong with the world? http://www.ishmael.org/
    78. Re:I was there by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Pffft. Xkill was my dock.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  2. OK by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 0

    If it isn't David Copperfield...

    Just post the entire text of War and Peace and get it over with. ;)

  3. 2nd post!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this starts a new trend for the 2nd decade of Slashdot?

  4. grateful dead quotes? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    Last time I touched it, it was indeed gray.

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:grateful dead quotes? by elzbal · · Score: 1

      I believe the quote you're looking for is "What a long, strange trip it's been". :)

      http://lyrc.com.ar/en/tema1en.php?hash=ac9746e8eb452be1b0070ef3b31b44fd

  5. Mmm, Enlightenment by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, Slashdot had some strange preoccupations in the early(*) days... every other story seemed to be about a new development release of Enlightenment (and a bit later some cheesy themes.org upload) or the 2.1 Linux kernel.

    Wait a sec - I think I probably prefer that to the speculation and corporate soap opera / press releases that clog up the front page these days.

    (*) Not that early. I started reading when Netscape announced their plans to free their web browser.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by vitaflo · · Score: 1

      (*) Not that early. I started reading when Netscape announced their plans to free their web browser.

      Early enough, most people don't have a 4 digit user ID. I believe when Mozilla was first thought up is about when I started reading too. But I was too afraid to post to even register at the time.

    2. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by spun · · Score: 1

      Malda wrote some sort of applet for Enlightenment. Something to do with sound? I can't remember, but that's how I found CnD.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Mandrake · · Score: 4, Informative

      Rob actually was a semi-frequent contributor to enlightenment for a while, in fact he wrote a lot of the code for snapshot pager back in 0.8/0.9...

      --
      Geoff "Mandrake" Harrison
      Some Random UI Hacker
    4. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by CmdrTaco · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, I *invented* it. You guys told me it couldn't be done. Of course, you were right- the performance sucked, but it looked awesome.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    5. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by CmdrTaco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was called ePlus. At first I just themeified asclock and released it for E. Before that I had written a CD switcher applet for the AfterStep dock, as well as a volume controller. Later I merged the clock, volume controls, and a few other things into a fully themable suite of little widgets for Enlightenment. Good times.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    6. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by MouseR · · Score: 1

      I got on relatively early because a co-worker got me into reading /.

      Eventually, I got involved in a few discussions so I registered. Wit that, I still managed a low 4 digit UID. But no one was looking at UIDs back then.

    7. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by rk · · Score: 5, Funny

      It just occurred to me that 10 years in grade is long enough. Shouldn't you be CaptTaco by now? ;-)

    8. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just occurred to me that 10 years in grade is long enough. Shouldn't you be CaptTaco by now? ;-)
      I have often wondered, being as he started all of this in college, if it wasn't a nickname that was applied to him as a teenager cause he commandeered all the tacos for dinner one night. Commandeer would better suit what Slashdot does to the available bandwith and server capacity for some websites linked from here as well.

      Anyone recall if he has ever explained the nick's origin before? Have a link?
    9. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by eosp · · Score: 1

      You must be new here ;)

      captcha: superior

    10. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by grappler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I read for a long time before getting a uid. I'm always very reluctant to actually sign up for a site. Yet another username/password to keep track of. Cost me a lot of bragging points I suppose.

      I first found the open source world when, as a 16 year old, I searched for "hacking" and instead of tips on unlocking software and spreading 'warez', I found myself reading an essay by Eric Raymond on what it means to be a 'real hacker'.

      From there I decided to build my own Linux box and started following Linux weekly news for updates (I needed support for my graphics card to come out, so I followed every update). Many of their stories linked to Slashdot stories, so that's how I found /. That was either 1997 or 1998.

      --
      Vidi, Vici, Veni
    11. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Mandrake · · Score: 4, Funny

      it did in fact look awesome :) We always tried to come up with ways to make the performance run a little better. And you have to admit I did spend a lot of time cleaning it up where it didn't crash anymore ;)

      --
      Geoff "Mandrake" Harrison
      Some Random UI Hacker
    12. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Mandrake · · Score: 4, Interesting

      eplus was actually the precursor to the whole 'epplet' / etc stuff that we started working on around 0.15/0.16 - and the reason that we wanted to make stuff like that work. I know I ran ePlus for ages after it was 'unsupported' by you hacking various fixes for using updated versions of stuff like imlib

      --
      Geoff "Mandrake" Harrison
      Some Random UI Hacker
    13. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      I didn't sign up initially too, like yourself, because I was a little hesitant at registering for just about any website at the time.
      I also started visiting around '97 or '98, being referred to slashdot by a co-worker, reading mostly at work . I believe it must've been right after he moved from Chips & Dips to Slashdot.

      At the risk of being modded offtopic, when I did finally register, I had the user "sp" (I was, and still am, a fan of Smashing Pumpkins). But, once I registered and started using my own domain name for email, I forgot to change my email address for the "sp" account, and subsequently forgot the password. I even emailed slashdot, possibly even Rob directly, about trying to get my "sp" account back, to no avail.
      So, I had to re-register, and got my longer UID.

      *sigh*

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    14. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    15. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by rjforster · · Score: 1

      I still have one of those 4-way CD changers somewhere. I never did manage to get your switcher applet to work but so rarely used more than one CD that I didn't care too much.

      And yes, I found CnD as it was connected to "Rob's Afterstep Page".

      My ID is the number is is because I waited a couple of days before registering, at first not being sure whether a login was any use for a site like Slashdot.

    16. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Hank+Scorpio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's nothing... I actually remember Chips & Dips, before Slashdot existed. But, like many old-timers I guess, I am also very reluctant to register for a web site unless I absolutely have to. And, I post very rarely. So, by the time I actually got around to registering I ended up with a 6-digit uid even though I've been around from the very beginning.

      Haha, so I guess this is a new twist on the classic low-uid pissing match ... the I've-been-around-longer-but-with-a-higher-uid pissing match. Awesome.

    17. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Could be worse, I have been reading /. since 98-99 didnt register until 2002....talk about a bloated UID :)

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    18. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Same here but I think I just didn't notice a place to sign up. Besides I could always comment as an AC.
      Wish I had signed up a year or two sooner. I might have been down in the four digits.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    19. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by nege · · Score: 1

      Good point - I would bet on RearAdmiralLowerHalfTaco. I don't even want to go into what that might imply...

    20. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by iperkins · · Score: 1

      I suggest bypassing Captain and going straight to Commodore. I always thought that sounded a lot better than Rear Admiral, but I'm not sure how to abbreviate it...

    21. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cmdre (at least in Canada where we still have such things)

    22. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just stay Commander. Commander-in-Chief, that is.

    23. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by ePlus · · Score: 0

      WTF? Someone called my name? Made me spill my coffee when I saw my name mentioned!

    24. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Don+Negro · · Score: 1

      I hear you. I think we all kind of decided to sign up at once, and on that day it was just a matter of what time zone you lived in and when you got around to reading slashdot. You and I probably signed up about six hours apart.

      --

      Don Negro
      Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

    25. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      Haha, awesome indeed!

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    26. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Hrunting · · Score: 1

      That CD switcher applet for AfterStep was what originally brought me to CnD and eventually Slashdot. It was the only thing that made my 3-disk CD changer in my old Gateway useful. Thanks for writing that!

    27. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Funny

      But to change his name, he'd need access to the database.

    28. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I didn't sign up right away because I didn't see a reason to go through the trouble of signing up.

    29. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by danlock4 · · Score: 1

      I suggest bypassing Captain and going straight to Commodore. [...] I'm not sure how to abbreviate it... How about Cmdr? :-)
      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    30. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by icebrain · · Score: 1

      Means the same thing, IIRC... Commodore is used in navies to refer to those who hold the rank of Captain, but are not the commanding officer of the vessel, because a ship can only have one captain. It doesn't matter what the CO's rank is, the person ranked Captain is referred to as Commodore if he is not the CO.

      How about just Admiral?

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    31. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      If you've been around long enough, you remember that the UID didn't used to be posted 'up front and blatant' on this site. It used to be something you had to go to somebody's info page to view. That, of course, was before the infamous 'masquerading as Bruce Perens' fiasco. "I am the Real Bruce Perens" and so on and so on.

      A low UID on here is just a sign of a lack of creativity. If you haven't gotten sick of an account and thrown it away you're stuck in a rut. I've pitched at least ten accounts. They all had their +1 (known as "excellent karma" these days.) It's disturbing to think that a 'low UID' here means anything special. A lot of us have been around a LONG time without needing to strut around about it.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    32. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should still be covering Enlightenment.

      We could get weekly updates on how DR17 is still in development. As it has been since 2000.

    33. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, do you remember the passwords for those accounts and would you be willing to share :)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    34. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by CmdrTaco · · Score: 2

      yeah it was the only way i could switch CDs in my little 4xCD switcher too. Loved that thing back in the day. Now I probably stick 10 CDs in my laptop a year. How things have changed :)

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    35. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Salis · · Score: 1

      Strut Strut ;)

      --
      Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
    36. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Pete · · Score: 1

      Yeah, almost exactly the same for me. A friend of mine pointed me to the pre-login slashdot, and I read for a while. Then when the registration thingy appeared, I ignored it for a while... but still got an account early enough to have a low four-digit UID (and my own name!).

      Ah, Enlightenment. Windowmaker. Redhat. 2.0 kernels. And that guy who wrote editorials on the nature of geekness, who a surprising number of slashdotters seemed to really despise. It doesn't really seem that long ago. :)

    37. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      it sucks being an old timer with a high UID. I'm so displeased by mine, I gripe about it in my sig.
      That's what we get for being paranoid about registering user names.
      Say, can any of you subscribers post my first comment or two? I remember my first one was especially stupid, and I was rightfully informed of that.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    38. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by MouseR · · Score: 1

      I actually despise having to register accounts to read or comment on things. It ticks me off to a degree that if I dont consider the site to be worthy of my time to register, I often just dont come back.

      When I do have to register, I often end up using the same nick: mouser. however, because mouser seems to be a hot pick, when it's not available, I prepend my initials.

      Since I tend not to pus insane comments (though I did post anonymously a couple of times), I dont feel like I have to cover my tracks and change alias every now and then. I've been using the alias "mouser" for more than 20 years in everything from BBS accounts to email addresses.

      I'm predictable that way.

    39. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by CAEpoxy · · Score: 1

      Same here - I only register for websites if registering gives me some sort of perk that I want. I only registered with slashdot to filter out topics I'm not interested in.

      And if anybody cares, I found slashdot around March '98 after buying RH5 to install on my POS pc that had a crappy Cyrix CPU (got tired of win95 crashing and taking my homework with it). Been a daily reader ever since, but this may be only the 2nd or 3rd time I've ever posted.

    40. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by jstomel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess I'm not an old timer but I started following slashdot in probably 2002. Didn't register until something like 2005 when I finally realized that if I wanted anyone to take my comments seriously I needed to not post AC.

    41. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by jstomel · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether you are using American or British rank. While what you said is true (and possibly taken straight out of Heinlein's "Starship Troopers") A commodore is anyone who commands more than one ship, but not a whole fleet. It was a popular rank in the 1800's British navy before communications allowed one man to actually command a fleet during combat. Also, after WWI and WWII both the American and British fleets had become glutted with more admirals than a peacetime navy could really support, so many of the rear admirals were recommissioned as "commodores" and quietly retired.

    42. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      We get signal

      What you say???

      Main screen turn on!

      IT'S YOU!!! :P

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    43. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      "Hand of God"
      'Nuff Said... :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    44. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by MadCat · · Score: 1

      I remember coming here due to Enlightenment news. And I do love my 3 digit user id... love it very much :D

      --
      There is no sig...
    45. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by iperkins · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the Victorian usage. I believe that groupings of ships smaller than fleets were/are called flotillas, so it would be Commodore Taco of Flotilla Slashdot or CmdreTaco

      Error: .sig not found

    46. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Same here - I only register for websites if registering gives me some sort of perk that I want. I only registered with slashdot to filter out topics I'm not interested in. Same here, I only finally registered on that special day when they sent out tshirts to all the new subscribers back when they were trying to bring the numbers up... Ah those were the days...

      (the above is not true)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    47. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the rippling water thing...

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    48. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by xhrit · · Score: 1

      you could try to purchase a low UID on ebay.

    49. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by jayteedee · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I actually registered earlier, but forgot password. Now, I don't even remember the UID (or password). Twas good to standardize on usernames and passwords. I think I started that on Slashdot. Oh memories!!!

      --
      Religion and science are both 90% crap..but that doesn't negate the other 10%.
    50. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      Same thing here. I waited a while to register, got a (relatively) high UID. Also, at the time I registered I'd been named as a co-contributor to the VRML spec, so I choose a userid to brag about it. Now I'm stuck with a name that I don't use anywhere else, and if I start a new id I'll lose all my karma.

      Looking at all the comments, I'd guess that there must be over a thousand people who missed getting four digit uids because we didn't register early enough.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    51. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by bjb · · Score: 1

      Wit that, I still managed a low 4 digit UID. But no one was looking at UIDs back then.

      I am. Mine is lower than yours.

      (waiting for someone with a lower digit to e-slap me on that one >grin

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    52. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Could be worse, you could have completely forgotten what your name was because you signed up when you still had a CompuServe account that you canceled in 1998.

    53. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > I'm not sure how to abbreviate it...

      Wow, you MUST be new here. The accepted online abbreviation for Commodore is C=

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    54. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Trull · · Score: 1

      Just sitting around, stroking my ego with the other 100k guys.

      I look up and my cat leans into my arm, stretches and breathes deeper before sleeping.

      --
      -- NSY - SY OOT - Doric signs on local shop doors.
    55. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Wizy · · Score: 1

      I am glad you didn't speak the name that shall not be spoken. We should have had a celebration when he left.

    56. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Ego. What a delightful name for a cat.

    57. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by kyofunikushimi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well... I'VE pitched at least 11 accounts. AND I was around here before CmdrTaco!

      --
      oo
    58. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by Dagda · · Score: 1

      I always wondered back then if Rob on Slashdot was the same Rob from the enlightenment development. Oh man did I love that thing, even if it kept crashing and was sometimes soo slow. :-) The themes one could down load for it were just so cool and so customizable for the time.

      --
      Bacchus has drowned more men then Neptune.
    59. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by thelenm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was pretty sure I had a Slashdot account way back when. I was at Hope with those guys and I remember Rob typing away in the back of the classroom - Stegink hated it. I've been trying without success to remember even the username ever since. Maybe I'm thinking of a little BBS thing Nate wrote, but I could have sworn it was Slashdot. Ah well.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    60. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by xtracto · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to find a post with not too much karma from you Sir. I wanted to ask you this question... haven't you considered using that re-captcha technology instead of the simple captcha you've got for the anonymous cowards post? I think it would be very nice as a site with so many traffic as slashdot can help a lot in such noble task of OCR help to digitize books.

      I know a story was run on slashdot some time ago (and a dupe was also reported earlier this month IIRC ;-) ). I just wanted to give you the idea so you might (or not) consider it.
      cheers

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    61. Re:Mmm, Enlightenment by CmdrTaco · · Score: 2

      www.slashcode.com. Patches are always welcome.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
  6. Interesting, but... by andreyw · · Score: 1

    ...this thread is useless without pics =)

    1. Re:Interesting, but... by Tet · · Score: 1
      ...this thread is useless without pics =)

      Here you go. From memory, it was that image that brought me to CnD in the first place...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    2. Re:Interesting, but... by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'd forgotten that image. I actually purchased a t-shirt with it on the front. I think my wife (then-girfriend) threw it away along with my black-n-green /. shirt when both developed holes large enough to be mistaken for the arms. She denies it to this day, but I'm sure it was her...

      Curse you, honey, for throwing away a piece of Internet history!

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  7. Low ID Roll call by Critical_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Low ID Roll call!!!

    I figured this was necessary to get all the old chaps from the CnD days out.

    Don't hold my high ID against me. I waited until the last minute to sign up for an account.

    1. Re:Low ID Roll call by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      I guess I just about qualify. Slashdot was pretty much established as an internet phenomenon when I started reading though.

    2. Re:Low ID Roll call by Tet · · Score: 1
      Don't hold my high ID against me. I waited until the last minute to sign up for an account.

      Heh... and I thought I held out for a long time!

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:Low ID Roll call by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      Was also a hold out on registering.. but I think I started following around 98 when I was working Tech support at Erols Internet, or abuse at uunet (pre mci days)

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    4. Re:Low ID Roll call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lurked forever before making an account.

      AC forever!

    5. Re:Low ID Roll call by cblack · · Score: 1

      I don't often post these days and also try to avoid reading comments TOO much since it can be such a time sink. I figured I'd make an appearance :)

    6. Re:Low ID Roll call by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I always love these little bits, although they usually spawn more organically.

      Really, I'd like to see a list of when various account IDs were created. I know I've been around for a long time (I think 6-7 years or so) but I really don't know. But if I knew when 10000 was created, 100000, 200000, 1000000, etc... I could estimate. Plus is would just be interesting to see.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    7. Re:Low ID Roll call by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      I didnt register late 2000 or early 2001

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    8. Re:Low ID Roll call by spun · · Score: 1

      Actually, slashcode uses 666 internally as an ID for ACs, so about 665 IDs are lower than yours.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    9. Re:Low ID Roll call by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      I'd have a lower id, but when registration started it was "Another site with pointless registration?? Why?" Then they added (or I discovered?) the perks (mod points, customization, etc.).

    10. Re:Low ID Roll call by brunascle · · Score: 1

      ID 646779 was registered somewhere between 2000 and 2002 (i think), my current ID was registered about 2 years ago, and i think i started seeing IDs in the millions about a year ago.

    11. Re:Low ID Roll call by Paulo · · Score: 1

      Low ID represent!!

      (Ironically, this is the first post I make in years, since nowadays I consider the comments pretty much useless. But what the hell...).

    12. Re:Low ID Roll call by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I didnt register late 2000 or early 2001"

      I was guessing the same. I thought it was after 9/11, but, now I'm guessing it was before...maybe a year before seeing how close our ids are.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Low ID Roll call by JustShootMe · · Score: 1

      I actually had an account with an ID of around 300. But I moved providers and lost the password... and can't get it back because I lost use of the address it was sent to.

      I'm not even sure I could get that address back if I tried.

      It really sucks, but oh well.

      --
      For linux tips: http://www.linuxtipsblog.com
    14. Re:Low ID Roll call by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, so you read slashdot for the stories!?

      Man things really have changed.

    15. Re:Low ID Roll call by Camaro · · Score: 1

      I held out for the exact same reason, and of course signed up for the exaxt same reasons as you. I was so tired of having to get accounts for everything. Oh well, our ID numbers are still pretty low.

    16. Re:Low ID Roll call by ShadowBlade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I rarely ever post, but I've been reading /. since the beginning.

    17. Re:Low ID Roll call by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      Is there anyway to tell when you registered? Can one decipher it from my number?

    18. Re:Low ID Roll call by Jose · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. started around summer of '98 I believe. was working tech support and bored (surprise surprise!)

      and i believe this is my first "me too!!" post.

      --
      The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
    19. Re:Low ID Roll call by tgd · · Score: 1

      Werd

      There was a discussion about this the other day -- a bunch of us missed the day Taco added user accounts to the system, and ended up with higher UIDs than we probably would've otherwise. I think it was almost a week before I noticed you could login.

    20. Re:Low ID Roll call by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I think I registered about 6 or 7 years ago also, if that helps.

    21. Re:Low ID Roll call by kma · · Score: 1

      Oh, fine. What the heck. Represent to the fullest.

    22. Re:Low ID Roll call by arcade · · Score: 1

      Only reason my ID is so high is that I, as a bunch of others here, thought "Bleh, another site that demands registration" ..

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    23. Re:Low ID Roll call by Brian360 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I found an old e-mail sent to me from slashdot back in 2000... I have no idea when my account was actually created though.

      Received: from mail.andover.net [64.28.67.55] (slashdot@slashdot.org); Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:01:19 -0400
      X-Envelope-To: bweaver
      Received: from localhost (nobody@www4.slashdot.com [10.2.48.4])
              by mail.andover.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id e6DI1UA08134
              for <bweaver@mailandnews.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:01:30 -0400
      Message-Id: <200007131801.e6DI1UA08134@mail.andover.net>
      Subject: Slashdot user password for Brian360
      Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
      Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
      Mime-version: 1.0
      To: bweaver@mailandnews.com
      From: slashdot@slashdot.org
      Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 18:01 +0000
      X-PMFLAGS: 34078848 0 1 P2DD70.CNM

      The user account 'Brian360' on Slashdot has this email
      associated with it. A web user from 208.3.12.32 has
      just requested that password be sent. It is 'YHr7MgVF'. You
      can change it after you login at <URL:http://slashdot.org/users.pl>.

      If you didn't ask for this, don't get your panties all in a knot.
      You are seeing this message, not "them". So if you can't be
      trusted with your own password, we might have an issue, otherwise,
      you can just disregard this message.

      --Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda
          malda@slashdot.org

    24. Re:Low ID Roll call by Leto-II · · Score: 1

      I don't remember Chips & Dips, but I must have joined not long after it changed names. I was on before registration was available anyway. I thought I hadn't joined until some time in '98 but from the dates in the story it must have been in '97...

      --
      Do not anger the worm.
    25. Re:Low ID Roll call by Saint · · Score: 1

      How low counts? :)

    26. Re:Low ID Roll call by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 1

      Still stop by from time-to-time. This place got huge. What ever happened to Sengan? (After the r/o debacle...)

    27. Re:Low ID Roll call by jareds · · Score: 2, Informative

      I registered on Oct 8, 1999 (I have the original registration e-mail, and this matches my recollection of registering as a college freshman), so that is presumably very nearly when 100000 registered.

    28. Re:Low ID Roll call by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      That was exactly what I thought, didn't actually register until I noticed one day that I was seeing users with 100k+ UIDs, I wasn't too big on registering accounts back then as it seemed every other website demanded registration just to read..

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    29. Re:Low ID Roll call by Jeff+Lightfoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A few years back I had four offers of $100+ for my ID number. I'm glad I didn't take them. Some things you just can't replace.

    30. Re:Low ID Roll call by MattyG · · Score: 1

      OK I have a low ID. :)

    31. Re:Low ID Roll call by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      FTW (well, almost....)

      Anyone here ever met CmdrTaco? *raises hand*

      Back in 2000 at ALS (Atlanta Linux Showcase). I *think* I bought him a drink, but that evening is kind of a blur.

    32. Re:Low ID Roll call by pegr · · Score: 1

      I actually had an account with an ID of around 300. But I moved providers and lost the password...
       
      I was in the same boat, but had to have my original UID. I sent an email or two, promised to subscribe (which I did), and badda-bing, got my old UID back! Ya just gotta sweet talk them... And spend money...

    33. Re:Low ID Roll call by Lt_Kernal · · Score: 1

      I don't post much anymore. Hell, I hardly ever post at all. I read the site every day, though. Every day.

      I still remember CnD, and the heady days when Slashdot didn't have a "working" moderation system. It didn't seem like *that* long ago when trolls like TheGloriousMeept and OGG_THE_CAVEMAN roamed the Slashdot wilderness...and then there were the people that ended up on K5, like Signal 11 and Shoeboy. I went there for like, five minutes. Just like everywhere else. I always keep coming back here. I never even gave Digg a fair shot. Call me loyal or call me stupid. Your choice.

      --
      My posts don't reflect the opinion of my employer, and my employer's opinion doesn't influence the content of my posts.
    34. Re:Low ID Roll call by ximenes · · Score: 2, Funny

      The key is to reload early and often. I hope you've learned a valuable lesson.

    35. Re:Low ID Roll call by Vadim+Grinshpun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      :))
      I wasn't actually one of the CnD crowd, but was introduced to /. sometime during my freshman year in college ('97-'98). But I'll answer the roll-call anyway.

    36. Re:Low ID Roll call by JustShootMe · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I found it. I'm going to give that a shot. Thanks.

      --
      For linux tips: http://www.linuxtipsblog.com
    37. Re:Low ID Roll call by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Oh ok. It was perfect timing since summer 1997 was my first job as a Windows NT4 admin and I was in charge of the Internet dialup gateway, hehehe. Spent a few hours a day on /. or ebay or, other neat stuff.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    38. Re:Low ID Roll call by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Me too! :)

      I thought the user accounts were lame (they were introduced what, 6 to 8 months after /. started, anyone remember?). But gave in after about a month or two (I can't remember what made me do so, some new feature must have been added for users I guess, e.g. comment history or somesuch?).

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    39. Re:Low ID Roll call by LeftNose · · Score: 1

      I joined in late '98, I think. I'm pretty sure I have the registration email at home.

      My first comment was 10/28/99. though.

    40. Re:Low ID Roll call by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      Damn, I did tech support at Erols Internet 1996-97, right before my first sysadmin (NT) job. Talk about old-school memories. I remember walking past the UNIX admins, seeing a screen of what looked like gibberish & thinking, "there's NO way I'd ever be able to do that". :)

    41. Re:Low ID Roll call by markana · · Score: 1

      I started lurking in '98 or '99 or so... didn't get around the actually registering for a few years though. I'm 3 companies down the road, though.

      Has it really been that long?

    42. Re:Low ID Roll call by lowid+(24)+_________ · · Score: 1

      Here!

    43. Re:Low ID Roll call by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Low ID Roll call!!!

      One of my coworkers told me about this site, Slashdot, that had geeky stuff I might like reading about. I registered in one of the first few visits because it seemed like the thing to do, but if I'd known I'd be stuck with that same smartassed handle a decade and a million other accounts later, I probably would've put more thought into it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    44. Re:Low ID Roll call by pgrote · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see when a range of IDs came into use.

    45. Re:Low ID Roll call by yebb · · Score: 1

      Whoa, that is one low ID. I thought I had bragging rights with mine, but nope.
      Yours is about as low as I've seen.

    46. Re:Low ID Roll call by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did, I've been clicking refresh every five minutes for ten years.

    47. Re:Low ID Roll call by cout · · Score: 1

      I'm a late-comer; I guess I started reading back in high school after someone emailed my about a link to an article I wrote for CScene about wavelets (actually, it was a rewrite of my high school science fair project). I guess that means I started reading in fall of '07 or summer of '08.

      I wonder how many other people have started reading after being linked to.

      I also wish I could find that article, but slashdot's search feature doesn't seem to go back far enough.

    48. Re:Low ID Roll call by soab · · Score: 1

      That would be amusing to see because most of us can't remember when we signed up ... 8+ years ago is a long time to try and remember something, I already forget what I had for lunch.

    49. Re:Low ID Roll call by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      It used to be considered good etiquette to lurk for 2 to 4 weeks before joining a discussion group. I do recall that when I finally signed up was around the time moderation was being introduced.

      It's fair that I have a high user id, I don't remember Chips & Dips at all.

    50. Re:Low ID Roll call by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      I've been reading since '98, but didn't create an account for ages.

      I finally had to create an account because the signal to noise ratio became so bad I needed to set my viewing threshold permanently at +3. I think I've read the same in many of these type of threads.

      (BTW, IMHO the best way to read Slashdot is with comments nested and threaded, with the threshold set at least to +3, and with simple design, low bandwidth, and no icons set in your preferences.)

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    51. Re:Low ID Roll call by archen · · Score: 1

      Actually I was sort of thinking along similar lines when this type of thread came up before. Would I rather have a low ID or the username I wanted? In the end I'm glad I got the username I wanted. It might be great to have a low uid for whatever reason, but there is something to be said for not looking like you're from AOL wherever you go.

    52. Re:Low ID Roll call by Richard · · Score: 1

      I registered sometime in the fall of 1998.

      --
      -Richard
    53. Re:Low ID Roll call by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      I actually registered so early I got a negative ID, but then I went and forgot the login details, curse it!

      So now I'm stuck with this lousy 4 digit ID. But I pwn you all, n00bs.

      Btw, if it's one thing I like best about low-ID threads, it's the idiots who get really fucking angry about people boasting about their low IDs. The reason I like it is that they're such dicks that they don't realise that none of us really care about our low IDs. It's funny that they get so MAD! when we're just joking around.

    54. Re:Low ID Roll call by Epi-man · · Score: 1

      I pretty sure I became a /. regular in late '98, told about it by a friend in grad school from AU, he also got me into Linux (thank goodness!) at the same time. Amazing how quickly the userids started climbing given I am over double the IDs showing for the summer of '98. I know I waited a while before registering to come up with (what seemed at the time like) a good name, as well as to make sure I would actually stick around...guess I did.

    55. Re:Low ID Roll call by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      Yeah...it took me a while to get around to registering too. It's been a fun ride though...it's interesting to see how many of the lower id's are still lurking around.

    56. Re:Low ID Roll call by darsal · · Score: 1

      I don't remember exactly when I registered this account. I think I did it simply to customize the page, so it could have been a while between registration and my initial post in early 1999.

      I logged in today for the first time in at least a year, just to see my ID number and chime into this branch.

    57. Re:Low ID Roll call by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Anyone here ever met CmdrTaco? *raises hand* Yeah and Hemos too, I think. It was 1999ish at a Tokyo Linux Users Group nomikai and that evening is kind of a blur. I think we did group karaoke afterwards.

      Bruce Perens was at the same table and I was the guy bitching about how hard it was to follow Slashdot in the Japanese timezone. :)
    58. Re:Low ID Roll call by cixelsyd · · Score: 1

      Believe I registered shortly after user accounts were implemented (obviously).

      --
      Take a dollar, divide it by 100, take two and call me in the morning.
    59. Re:Low ID Roll call by websensei · · Score: 1

      I lurked in 98 and created this account in 99 (springtime?), IIRC.
      I remember when getting a +5 insightful felt like a real accomplishment ;)

      In all seriousness, hats off and thanks Rob and Taco and everyone, /. will always have a special place in my heart, here's to the next 10 years.

      --

      La via sola al paradiso incommincia nel inferno
    60. Re:Low ID Roll call by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      I registered early, to post one comment, but didn't start posting as a regular until months (years?) later in 1999.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    61. Re:Low ID Roll call by zentec · · Score: 1

      You sub 200,000 IDs make me feel so young!

    62. Re:Low ID Roll call by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      The only reason that my ID is so high is because I didn't see any need to sign up for an account for the first couple of months it was available.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    63. Re:Low ID Roll call by sl70 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I remember the site with the duckpins. How come my ID isn't lower?

      --
      Thank God I'm an atheist!
    64. Re:Low ID Roll call by antdude · · Score: 1

      Am I low enough? I never used C&D though.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    65. Re:Low ID Roll call by Scott+Francis[Mecham · · Score: 1

      I'd been reading it off and on as a lab monitor in the dorm computer rooms. I remember a story going up saying "hey, you're going to need registration shortly" and figured I might as well get an account. Not that I've done a whole lot with it, of course, and it's mostly a shining example to column length truncation.

      > if I'd known I'd be stuck with that same smartassed handle a decade and a million other accounts later, I probably would've put more thought into it.
      The same goes for me, albeit something a bit shorter. I blame my excessive exposure to anime newsgroups at the time, where people were busy inventing long and elaborate names relating to their favorite show and clubbing newcomers to death with them.

      --
      --
    66. Re:Low ID Roll call by mandie · · Score: 1

      Yep, user IDs are assigned in order, so you're identifiable as having signed up a few years ago, but not during the first three or four.

      For reference, I started reading it on and off in '97 while, like half the Slashdot oldtimers, working tech support at my town's ISP, but think I signed up in summer '99, working at the same ISP. 1500 customers, and we treated them like they were our own children.

      Our own dull-witted, accident-prone, occasionally-irritating children.

      I made a gorgeous tree from the innards of discarded CAT 3 cable that summer, too.

      Unlike most other Slashdot oldtimers, though, I was a socially-awkward teenage GIRL working tech support at the local ISP. Oh, the memories...

      In this thread, I feel like a kid again with an ID of 69148!

      --
      Grüß Gott aus Bayern!
    67. Re:Low ID Roll call by antdude · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the password. [grin] :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    68. Re:Low ID Roll call by mjwise · · Score: 1

      You rang?

      I was here for some time pre-userids, and I recall registering for an account shortly after seeing a news item about user accounts on the front page, even though I think they were optional for a while, even to post as a non-AC. I never commented very much, but now I actually keep up with slashdot more regularly than I used to in the earlier days actually thanks to RSS feeds.

    69. Re:Low ID Roll call by true_majik · · Score: 1

      I registered July 1st, 2002. Like others, I still have the registration email. Like others, I didn't register when I first came across SlashDot until I actually wanted to comment. I don't remember when I actually came across SlashDot, but I doubt I would have had a 4-digit uid had I registered sooner.

    70. Re:Low ID Roll call by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      Same here! I read Slashdot for a at least a couple months before I registered, and I'm pretty sure that was so I could save preferences.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    71. Re:Low ID Roll call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's more believable than reading playboy for the stories...

    72. Re:Low ID Roll call by fACTOR · · Score: 1

      Never been much of a poster. I registered during my first job, as a administrator for a web-hotel. Got intoduced to Slashdot trough som nerd friend from high scool.

    73. Re:Low ID Roll call by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      I did, also at Atlanta Linux Showcase. I asked him what happened to tacohell (this was back when it was very, very purple), and he said you had to put the / on the end now.

      I've still got his business card somewhere.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    74. Re:Low ID Roll call by mce · · Score: 1

      509 is also still around. As is 508, a gentleman I've never met until yesterday, as documented in my posting history. But we all loose big time compared no 1, anyway, so let's stop bragging.

    75. Re:Low ID Roll call by JimB · · Score: 1

      OUCH ! I guess I'd have to ask you what TIME you registered ! Since I must have been only an hour or two AFTER you (CDT) ! I no longer even remember when I registered. Sometime in late spring/early summer 1998 or thereabouts. I was working as a UNIX admin at 'cars.com'.

    76. Re:Low ID Roll call by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      Now that I search my soul- I remember being pretty upset I didn't register to comment. I rarely do now and even less so back in the day. I know I was reading slashdot at my first programming job in college back in 98-99. I wish I would have registered.

    77. Re:Low ID Roll call by Intosi · · Score: 1

      Can't exactly remember when I registered, but it must've been somewhere around the same time you registered ;)

      --

      Intosi

    78. Re:Low ID Roll call by mosch · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure when I got my account, but I do know slashdot had user accounts for a while before I bothered signing up for one. They were available for at least a few months before I signed up.

    79. Re:Low ID Roll call by mog · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. it just occurred to me that I have never once changed my password.

    80. Re:Low ID Roll call by markhb · · Score: 1

      Ogg was funny as hell, and MEEPT at least made some interesting points, a far cry from those whose posts wind up at -1 automatically. Ah, for the old days. OGG THE OPEN-SOURCE CAVEMAN! OGG BREAK HEAD WITH OPEN-SOURCE CD!

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    81. Re:Low ID Roll call by spun · · Score: 1

      Same here. To think, we could have had 3-digit IDs, damn it!

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    82. Re:Low ID Roll call by alanw · · Score: 1

      *Waves*

      IIRC, I subscribed after my brother e-mailed me Slashdot's URL. I can't remember anything about Chips'n'Dips.

      Another question.

      When did slashdot start probing ports 81, 8080, 1080, 444 and 1026 before allowing posting?

    83. Re:Low ID Roll call by Sinical · · Score: 1

      I think that account creation opened up on like a Monday or something, and I put it off for a few days, registering on a Thursday (?). I think this would have been about this time (October, November), 1997. So it only took three or for days for me to sadly end up at 14k+ whatever the hell I am. Less procrastination would have netted me a bitchin' 3 or 4 digit UID. I am sad.

      That's what I remember. But of course I am an old man now (30!) and thus my memory is as faltering as my footsteps.

    84. Re:Low ID Roll call by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      The lowest 6-digit user ID I could find using my genius googling skills was Shimbo (100005). Someone with a Slashdot subscription can see when he/she made his/her first post.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    85. Re:Low ID Roll call by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      Really, I'd like to see a list of when various account IDs were created. I know I've been around for a long time (I think 6-7 years or so) but I really don't know. But if I knew when 10000 was created, 100000, 200000, 1000000, etc... I could estimate. Plus is would just be interesting to see.

      I re-registered with this account around October of 2005, to give a rough idea of when it hit 1,000,000. Times like this I miss my original UID even more than I miss my usual username.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    86. Re:Low ID Roll call by crisco · · Score: 1

      I thought I was slacking when I finally logged in to this one.

      --

      Bleh!

    87. Re:Low ID Roll call by MeerCat · · Score: 1

      Guess I must have been about the same time then...

      The weird thing is that I remember my user id number here even tho I've forgotten so many PIN numbers etc in the last few years.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    88. Re:Low ID Roll call by Caged · · Score: 1

      I encountered Slashdot.org in my university days, around the 1998 mark actually. Before I stumbled upon Netscape Navigator I was using good ol lynx through my universities' unix shell account and Kermit through a 2400baud modem. Anyone still remember Kermit? Or 2400baud modems :P.

      Long and long time reader, rare poster.

      And now, once again, slashdot has made me late for work.

    89. Re:Low ID Roll call by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Well, an obvious solution presents itself . . .

      How many theives are going to realize that you have a /. uid much less to use that uid as your pin.

      Oh if only I had been on /. earlier and could have sought a 4-digit uid. ah well, I'm still in the low low 6's

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    90. Re:Low ID Roll call by Krilomir · · Score: 1

      Like many others I waited until the last minute with the registration. I've always been mostly a lurker, so I didn't really need at first. I think I started to read slashdot a few months after it opened back in 1997. I got the url from a computer magazine back when people still read those on paper. This is actually my second account on slashdot. To this day I still haven't figured out the password for my initial slashdot account, and of course I have no idea which email I used to create it. It's still a 5-digit account though, so it wouldn't change much :)

    91. Re:Low ID Roll call by TopSpin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure when I got my account, but I do know slashdot had user accounts for a while before I bothered signing up for one. They were available for at least a few months before I signed up. Same here. I might have to go dig up that enrollment email. Lost track of the account for years before it occurred to me that I had created it. I'll admit I was rather pleased to discover it was a sub-1000 id. I don't recall feeling any pressing need to get in early; I know I'd been lurking a while before I got around to it.

      Anyhow, Slashdot still rocks; it's one of three sites I check every morning. The other two having been fungible over the years.

      Many happy returns.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    92. Re:Low ID Roll call by MadHat · · Score: 1

      You sub 200,000 IDs make me feel so young! I'm only 26....but in "internet years", I'm ancient.
      --

      "The difference between genius and stupid is that genius has its limits." -- Unknown
    93. Re:Low ID Roll call by Wheely · · Score: 1

      We know!

    94. Re:Low ID Roll call by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I remember that too. That was awesome. I created an account shortly after watching /., I didn't lurk for months like some. One of the first comments I remember posting (or perhaps jut my first to get a +5) was a little film-noir like description of something. After reading the story it just reminded me of noir style narration so I took the idea and ran with it. Wasn't my first comment, but I was quite surprised when it got modded up (I figured I'd get an off-topic or a troll).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    95. Re:Low ID Roll call by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I don't have a low ID. I am however one for the rare users with / in his nick.

    96. Re:Low ID Roll call by tpurdy · · Score: 1

      Low ID Roll call!!!


      I think I registered in late 97 or early 98.
    97. Re:Low ID Roll call by Destrius · · Score: 1

      I'm still alive. No idea when I registered though... is there some way we can check? Perhaps there's a timestamp in the database?

    98. Re:Low ID Roll call by sho-gun · · Score: 1

      2440 checking in!

    99. Re:Low ID Roll call by Wolfchild · · Score: 1

      Heh, my first post.

      I remember signing up a LONG time ago.
      I remember reading C&D back in the day.

    100. Re:Low ID Roll call by loomis · · Score: 1

      141922 is me.

      --
      "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    101. Re:Low ID Roll call by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      That makes me wonder: who is the oldest Slashdotter (in age, not UID)?

    102. Re:Low ID Roll call by airos4 · · Score: 1

      Mine was 8/27/99 - just found the original email.

      --
      I wish there was a choice that said "Factually Wrong -1" when I mod.
    103. Re:Low ID Roll call by ebw · · Score: 1

      Here!

      Not from CnD, but fairly early. Sometime in '98 I think.

      I faintly remember reading the news section from linux.com(?) at that time, and was thrilled when I found slashdot.

      At the time, any mention of Linux or GNU or such in the mainstream press was a fairly big deal.

    104. Re:Low ID Roll call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 yrs!. Getting Nostalgic.

      I am not that old. Must be around 8 yrs. However, I did register and got a low ID. but forgot the user ID later on. Didn't knew, it was so worthwhile ;-).

      Cmdr. Is it possible to retrieve those low ID's using "reg exp" as I can't even remember user ID properly.

    105. Re:Low ID Roll call by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

      >

      I think I missed the account signup by a few days/weeks, I forget. Early 98, definitely.

      --
      -Stu
    106. Re:Low ID Roll call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did, I've been clicking refresh every five minutes for ten years.

      And you're still using Internet Explorer? ;)
    107. Re:Low ID Roll call by singularity · · Score: 1

      I am always amazed where the cut-off for "low UID" conversations move.

      I chime in on them every few years. One of the first ones I felt like my UID (2031) was *too high* to be considered an old-timer.

      Now I see people on this thread chiming in with five digit UIDs.

      And I have posted this a couple of times elsewhere, but my confirmation email has me creating an account on 3 September 2007, a few weeks after I started reading Slashdot.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    108. Re:Low ID Roll call by PedroP35 · · Score: 1

      Well, I was thinking that I signed up around late 1999-early 2000...but after glancing through some of this particular thread, it looks like I'd be right around mid-late summer 1998. That was the year I first got dial-up internet (on my dad's work laptop), graduated high school, wasted most of the summer on our ISP's local IRC server (I later worked at the ISP doing tech support), met my wife (on IRC), got my first job, started college (subsequently deciding to enter the tech field), got my first personal computer with Windows, installed ZipSlack on my personal computer, and apparently, created a Slashdot account. Busy year, I guess. I must've learned about Slashdot on IRC, because I didn't know any other people in the Engineering department until 1999.

    109. Re:Low ID Roll call by Peter+Amstutz · · Score: 1

      Started reading slashdot after it was linked to on a free software project mailing list (the Berlin project, I believe). I remember bumming around the high school library during free periods checking slashdot. That was before threaded comments, moderation or even user accounts. Been reading ever since... Happy 10th birthday, Slashdot.

    110. Re:Low ID Roll call by jbaugher · · Score: 1

      Great to see some other 2 digit IDs are still out there reading. It's hard to believe I've been reading /. for 10 years now. Thanks CmdrTaco!

      P.S. I met Rob once at a Linux exposition. I figured he might be famous some day, so I had him autograph something; my friend was being silly and posed as my father. So how did he sign things? "Your father smokes crack" or something equally loving. :-)

    111. Re:Low ID Roll call by John+Marter · · Score: 1

      I had a similar experience with rediscovering my account a few years later. I'm not sure why I got it in the first place. I hardly ever post.

    112. Re:Low ID Roll call by Brodeur · · Score: 1

      Ha! I must have beat you by a few minutes :-) 1998 some time?

    113. Re:Low ID Roll call by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I lurked for a while, too. I think customization, specifically slashboxes, led me to register.

    114. Re:Low ID Roll call by topher1kenobe · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm in. I'm loathe to follow the masses, so I usually hold off creating accounts. My ICQ number was 303577, and here you see my high /. number because I avoided the crowds.

      --

      yadda

  8. DEC Alpha Multia 166 by swestcott · · Score: 1

    DEC Alpha Multia 166 oh man that was the first web server I ever built. I also used Red Hat ahhh good times good times I ran it on the brand new highspeed internet in Alexandria VA Jones cable (bought by Comcast) only one of 300 using it. The cable modem was heaver than the DEC hudge! I still have it in a box some where bouth the cable modem and the DEC

    1. Re:DEC Alpha Multia 166 by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I had a 133 MHz. MILO bootloader! Overheating! KDE 1.0!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:DEC Alpha Multia 166 by sith · · Score: 1

      Mine had a dead motherboard battery, so you had to manually set the boot params every time you had to power it off. I seem to recall you had to manually enter the harddisk sector info and whatnot too. It was hooked up to a double height 5.25" scsi drive that sat on top of the case, with the scsi ribbon cable coming out of the alpha through the back, with a big sign saying "NOBODY TOUCH THIS" ... good times...

    3. Re:DEC Alpha Multia 166 by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I booted off an IDE, I think - with a "repurposed" sun SCSI external that hosted /usr and /var.

      The battery issue eventually ate mine. I should have kept the 2.88 floppy drive! The whole rig ended up at the famous computer recycler, noted in another slashdot story as a CNN hero.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  9. Strange memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant.

  10. Ahh, back in the day by Erich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before the signal-to-noise ratio was so low, before ads, before the need for accounts...

    It was a simpler, friendlier time.

    Sniff.

    --

    -- Erich

    Slashdot reader since 1997

    1. Re:Ahh, back in the day by olip · · Score: 1


      In case you didn't notice, this story has a "+1, Low uid" mod option.

    2. Re:Ahh, back in the day by Samus · · Score: 1

      Before it was possible to make a first post comment without using a bot...

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    3. Re:Ahh, back in the day by Wylfing · · Score: 1

      It's funny how fast the IDs grew. Mine is almost 150K and I started reading in 1998.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    4. Re:Ahh, back in the day by eosp · · Score: 1

      I've done it quiet a few times. Without waiting. I just see that it gives the "nothing to see here" message, refresh a few times until the login system works, prepare my message in notepad, and have fun.

    5. Re:Ahh, back in the day by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Before the signal-to-noise ratio was so low

      Yeah, because nothing says "signal" like Natalie Portman, naked and petrified with hot grits.

      When exactly was this halcyon time you seem to be misremembering?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Ahh, back in the day by Casca · · Score: 1

      The good old days, before every other comment turned into "duplicate post!!!!! do the editors even care anymore?????" and crap like that.

      I remember waiting anxiously for the next story to pop up while writing a really bad C program to track IP addresses in a small dark cubicle in a vast dark basement of an aging government building...

      --
      Casca
    7. Re:Ahh, back in the day by nsaspook · · Score: 1

      Ha yes, the good old days...

      Nothing like the ascii picture of a A**hole to light up your day.

      --
      In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
    8. Re:Ahh, back in the day by Linux_Bastard · · Score: 1

      Not so funny really, There were a lot of readers probably over 200K before there were accounts, and every site wanted you to have accounts to pound you with spam. Also, at first the accounts were effectively worthless, so I didn't bother. I think I did finally create an account because of some preference about something really bothersome at the top of the screen...

      I think a lot of the user base did the same thing within a few months.

      I still have the old asus p55t2p4 P100 that I first used to read slashdot on.

      --
      F X=0:1:9999 F D=2:1 Q:((X>2)&(X#D=0)!((D>X/2)&(X'=1))) I D>(X/2) W:$X>75 ! W X,?$X+5-$l(X) Q
    9. Re:Ahh, back in the day by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      So it was back in the day when posts were unique and the editors seemed to care?

  11. Comprehensive? by sits69 · · Score: 0

    This great opus can't be considered all-inclusive unless you mention the 'incident with the bird'.

  12. Low IDs can fuck the hell right off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Slashcode would be the perfect system for objective community filtering if it weren't for the ID system, which only drags it back down to the level of any other clique-dominated web forum.

    Fuck your low ID, and fuck your shitty elitism. Good job ruining slashdot.

    1. Re:Low IDs can fuck the hell right off by smcdow · · Score: 1

      hilarious! great comment!

      --
      In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    2. Re:Low IDs can fuck the hell right off by ximenes · · Score: 1

      I do think the visible user ids is an odd design choice of Slashdot, but aside from the occasional post from someone like me who really cares.

      Plus its a great way for me to acquire "friends" and "freaks" and whatever that stuff is.

  13. Awesome Story by noname4444 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As someone who only started reading Slashdot about 3 years ago, reading the history is extremely interesting. Thank you for posting this.

    I'm looking forward to the future Slashdot stories later this week!

    1. Re:Awesome Story by starakurva · · Score: 1

      OK, I was wondering if there was going to be a post that actually said "thank you", and if not, I was gonna be the first...

      THANKS to all who have been involved with /. including the users....I've always loved the site, not only because of its interesting stories, funny comments, and delicious cheese fries, but also because it's a great inspiration to be around brilliant minds.

      Reading /. never ceases to remind me of both how smart I am, and how stupid I am (kidding- but it's great to strain the brain trying to absorb some of the higher-level stuff, and feels awesome when thanks to user comments, I'm able to learn and understand them a bit better).

      Taco- I, and many others here owe ya a large, strong drink served by a cute Asian woman. Cheers!

      --
      All you need is lurv.
  14. So true... by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    Essentially, every second of my life was consumed without time for a break.

    I don't know how many times in the last 4 or 5 years I've killed an hour "reading a story on /." And even though time is the most precious resource, the hours of reading were generally worth it. *Much* more enjoyable than work. :)

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    1. Re:So true... by JaJ_D · · Score: 1

      And even though time is the most precious resource, the hours of reading were generally worth it. *Much* more enjoyable than work. :)

      Fair shout, although (with some of the programming jobs I've had), nailing "intimate" parts of my body to lumps of wood is more enjoyable (and a lot less painful in the long run :-)

      Jaj

    2. Re:So true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how many times in the last 4 or 5 years I've killed an hour "reading a story on /."

      Don't tell my boss... I probably did it 40 times, just this week alone.
      (posting AC for obvious reasons)

    3. Re:So true... by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      40 hours, and it is only Wednesday? You should cut back on the unproductive OT. ;)

      Besides, unless (a) you are your companies bottleneck, or (b) your company is uber-efficient, there are definitely periods of down-time during a typical month where you can "pursue educational activities related to your business/industry". That's what reading /. is... staying informed about the world of "News for Nerds".

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  15. sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are my hero. if it weren't for the anonymous coward, this site wouldn't be half as fun. lets forget the fact the lower user id people made this place what it is. have you checked the original parent posters comment list? more +5 than I can count.

    1. Re:sweet by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be fair, people with low IDs seem to get some sort of automatic respect mods. Take the OP. Currently at +3 Interesting, for nothing more than stating he has a low ID. WTF, basically.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  16. Re:Crass self-promotion of a for-profit site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco? Is that you?

    If so, I'm sorry. I know you resisted the idea of navel gazing... but I never imagined it would spawn so much self-loathing!

  17. Slashdot Effect by Hemogoblin · · Score: 1
    On the anniversary page:

    503 Service Unavailable

    The service is not available. Please try again later. We've slashdotted slashdot! Cue universe implosion.

    1. Re:Slashdot Effect by ritesonline · · Score: 0

      Just shows what can happen on a slow news day...

    2. Re:Slashdot Effect by tiluki · · Score: 1

      Course we did.

      As soon as all the geeks round here see "yadda, yadda... Slashdot 10 year anniversary party"!!!! the next thought has got to be:

      Will there be beer?

      Followed by:

      Will there be chicks?

      And:

      Will it be in a dark basement similar to mine?

      Talk about a stampede...

    3. Re:Slashdot Effect by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      No. In a fit of anniversary nostalgia, he moved Slashdot back to the DEC for the day.

    4. Re:Slashdot Effect by afidel · · Score: 1

      We just blew up meta.slashdot.org which is probably a single web frontend possibly with its own database (though it's likely tied into the main DB cluster).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  18. Re:So leave, cunt. by smcdow · · Score: 1

    Oh, man, another hilarious post! excellent! keep 'em coming! how do you think this stuff up?

    --
    In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
  19. Where does it mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digg overtakes Slashdot...

    maybe in part II ... can't wait ...

  20. It just wouldn't be the same... by Wee · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...without the ACs. :-) I love it that there is always, somewhere, somebody who can find the time to shake their tiny fists in 'Net rage.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  21. What's slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's slashdot? ;-)

  22. Re:Oh, CONGRATULATIONS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, no, it's not that.

    Really, it's because youth suck.

  23. Re:So leave, cunt. by Erich · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I believe that if you check my comment history, my comments have been consistently more informative than the average Anonymous Coward comment.

    I will grant to you that my reminiscing was perhaps not the most informative comment, however as a comment to a reminiscent article I don't feel it is out-of-place.

    If slashdot hid userids, I would not alter how I comment at all.

    Do you think your profanity-laden post counts as a contribution? Your complaints that people who have been here longer are respected -- have you considered that perhaps the people who have been visiting technology forums for ten years are perhaps the best-informed and most interested in technology?

    Maybe I'm not the stupid one. Certainly not stupid enough to get very upset about an Anonymous Coward. AC's have usually had little to contribute, even from the very beginning.

    --

    -- Erich

    Slashdot reader since 1997

  24. Thanks, Taco by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was actually hoping you'd start writing about /. especially since I wasn't around here back then at the beginning. Certainly do write more, either about the CnD transformation or just random stories that are somehow related to CnD or /.. It feels like there should be enough material for a small book, let alone a series of short articles.

    And, since I missed the original anniversary story, congratulations!

    1. Re:Thanks, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he who controls the past controls the future, and he who controls the present controls the past
      -- George Orwell

      Interesting history. If I had to pick one online news site, /. would be it.

  25. When does the bidding start? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    and maybe later I'll write the the sequel where I talk of the transformation into sellout mega corporate evil and eventually irrelevant blemish on the history of the net
    When will the bidding start, and what's the reserve price for the sellout?







    (:-) for the humor impaired.
    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  26. Is there some kind of by JamesRose · · Score: 1

    Lame joke of the decade award or something?

    1. Re:Is there some kind of by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Nah, something's up. User pages blow up too.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  27. *laughs* Ah, it's UID time. by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    I admit it, I'm a UID whore. On my WELL account, I have it check /etc/passwd to see how many people still exist that have accounts older than me. It's down to 137 or so. I -will- be the longest-running-continuous-e-mail-account some day! I will! (20 years next April.) So I've always been kind of disgusted that I waited to sign up at Slashdot -- though the irony is, I never saw C&D. But I do remember the no-user-account-at-all days quite well; it's a shame the old pages are lost...

  28. Re:Crass self-promotion of a for-profit site. by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    Chill man, he's trying to tell us all the story of how you got your nickname.

  29. Re:slashdot is a ... by n0084ever · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    the only reason they get anywhere is because of affirmative action.

    since no one has yet pointed out... one of the best things about the way /. has developed is we now get to read comments like this. where would we be without them ???

  30. Re:Oh, CONGRATULATIONS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's talk about how we accessed Slashdot on our Babbage Analytical Engines. Should make for a real interesting set of comments, I'm sure.


    Whoa, slow down there, George Jetson. When I first started reading Slashdot I had to send a telegraph to 'the server' to request a page. It would be sent by carrier pigeon. When it arrived I sent it to my crack team of designers who would 'interpret' the 'HTML codes' and then load the document into my printing press. If all went well and nobody was maimed, I'd have a fresh copy of Slashdot to read within a day of making my request.

    And leaving comments? Don't get me started!
  31. Pics? How about movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what I remember most about CnD:

    http://cmdrtaco.net/hamster/

  32. Re:Crass self-promotion of a for-profit site. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    You're right. I think they should start a new site: "Metadot" or something like that. We can have stories about Slashdot, comments about slashdot, complaints about the moderation system, complaints about trolls, complaints about the newsworthiness of items on slashdot, and about anonymous cowards (etc, etc). Sound better?

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  33. I remember when... by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember stumbling on Chips and Dips when I was looking through the Hope pages wondering what the department was doing. Seemed like a pretty interesting little project, so I've continued lurking and contributing when I could. I've really enjoyed the site, and can't thank Rob enough for all of the years of reading. It's still the site I use for my tech news, despite the Diggs, Reddits, and what-nots.

    Thanks again. Rob, for Slashdot back then, and may there be many many more years of Slashdot to come!

  34. Re:Crass self-promotion of a for-profit site. by bigcmoney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm glad you wrote this Cmdr. I have loved this site since '00. I don't give a damn what anyone says, Slashdot is still one of the best tech aggregation sites on the net.

  35. Re:Low ID Roll call - 6511? by HEbGb · · Score: 1

    I think that's my number. Could have been lower if I had cared to register earlier. Anyhow, yeah, I've been reading on and off for a while. It's changed surprisingly little over the years.

  36. Some Links of Historical Interest by Lev13than · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's the Wayback archive of Rob Malda's page at Hope College.

    From his About Me page: "In closing, I would just like to say that if you read this whole document, then you need more of a life than I need for typing it." Keep in mind that this is the same page that states he got into computers due to "A strong need to somehow construct a woman like those kids in Weird Science".

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by JavaRob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's the first link the wayback machine has to Slashdot itself, at the start of 1997.

      You should check some of the other versions as well... later on that year, /. was already pretty damned close to what it is today, visually at least.

      I personally signed up sometime around either the summer of '97 or '98, I think... possibly '98, or my UID would be lower?

    2. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by DramaGeek · · Score: 1

      I went looking on my own, but it looks like you beat me to it.

      I'll go one further though: the only copy of CnD in the archive. (Complete with a review of 'Air Force One')

      http://web.archive.org/web/19970731134149/http://www.cs.hope.edu/~malda/cnd/

    3. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by setrops · · Score: 1

      hence the headline Chips,Dips.

      All it;s missing is Chains Whips :-)

    4. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. For the nasty little soire.

    5. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by cyphercell · · Score: 3, Funny

      /. was already pretty damned close to what it is today, visually at least.

      I don't know, about half those stories look like they were duped last week :P

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    6. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny
      Those stories are great, particularly the comment form at the end:

      Post Your Comments Here!

      If you don't have anything worthwhile to say, don't say it. If people continue to abuse this feature, I will have to remove it.
      Consider your bluff called, Mr. Taco.
    7. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by wanderingknight · · Score: 1
      I'm particularly interested about this little article here in that last link (November 11):

      Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... " Slightly reminiscent of a particularly infamous quote... :D
    8. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, these guys are true visionaries...
      Check out this excerpt from your 2nd link:

      Posted by Hemos on Wednesday November 11, @10:11AM
      from the why-i-could-put-3/4-my-cd-collection dept.
      Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... "


      Nice Hemos.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    9. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by Christianfreak · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I signed up around the end of 98. Probably in Nov or December and my UID is quite high so you had to be at least a few months ahead of me. Though it seems /. was growing really fast around that time.

      Personally with UIDs as high as they are now, it seems that even with my barely six-digit ID, there are many more n00bs than gurus :)

    10. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by singularity · · Score: 1

      Well, I have my confirmation email from Slashdot when I created my user account. It is dated 3 September 1998. I think you probably joined sometime in 1999, or your UID would be a lot lower.

      obTopic: And what is up with no 10th. Anniversary parties in Atlanta or Athens, GA?

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    11. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by JavaRob · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that's not a password reminder email? A post above has a much higher UID than mine, and joined in late 98 -- plus I'm pretty sure more than 2K users had signed up by Sept '98.

      Dunno. I'm certainly pretty fuzzy on when I signed up... I know I was *reading* it all summer '98, but that's all I can point to.

    12. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ChristianFreak's first post (UID: 100697), dated 25 October 1999.

      Not necessarily when he joined, but I think "end of 1998" could be "end of 1999" instead.

    13. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

      Haha:
      IBM announces a 25 gigger.

      Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... " :-=

      I learned about /. somewhere around Summer 1998, but was only lurking then. Joined in the end somewhere end of 1999 beginning of 2000.

    14. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by l0cust · · Score: 1
      From the second link:

      Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... "
      I started to laugh but the thought that someday my kids will be laughing at the tech-development stories of today gives me some perspective. :)
      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
    15. Re:Some Links of Historical Interest by revnight · · Score: 1

      Sept. 98 for 2000ish uid sounds about right. I (very vaguely) recall that I started reading slashdot in the fall of '98 about the time I first got interested in linux. I don't recall when registration started, but Alot of people joined in late '98 and uid's grew pretty rapidly.

      --
      "The things we wizards have to put up with."--Jethro Bodine
  37. Time to turn the browsing level to exclude AC by mollog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the discussion has been interesting. It's informative to see how the more important sites on the 'net were started. There's a common theme; geeks doing it for the love and fun of it.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:Time to turn the browsing level to exclude AC by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting discussion, but this isn't exactly an "important" site. It's a diversion, really.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  38. Slashdot is 10 years old by RendonWI · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't get it, so what if it is 2 years old?

    1. Re:Slashdot is 10 years old by mdm-adph · · Score: 4, Funny

      After a year of reading /., I'm pleased to announce that the time it takes for me to "get" jokes like this has decreased by approximatively 30%.

      Thanks, everybody.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    2. Re:Slashdot is 10 years old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would have been better if you asked if it was two instead of 2.

    3. Re:Slashdot is 10 years old by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      the time it takes for me to "get" jokes like this has decreased by approximatively 30%

      President Bush! I didn't know you read Slashdot, sir. No wonder you never get any work done.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:Slashdot is 10 years old by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny

      After a year of reading /., I'm pleased to announce that the time it takes for me to "get" jokes like this has decreased by approximatively 30%.

      Don't you mean 11110 % ?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:Slashdot is 10 years old by mdm-adph · · Score: 1
      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  39. Who the dickens? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If it isn't David Copperfield... Who the dickens are you talking about? The illusion artist formerly known as David Kotkin?
  40. One of the 400 still anonymous, still moderating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Wow. *snap fingers* Ten years just like that.

    Way back in the first few days, /. was quite wild and fun and about half the posts were trolls, flamebaits, races to see who could get the first post, with a whole lot of personality mixed in. If Jon Katz (To all former Katz haters, I still think we did the site an immense service, especially around the time of the Columbine shootings.) were still here, I think he'd have a lot of very interesting things to say about the good this site has done.

    What was wilder still was that not too long after I first joined, the first attempts at moderation came into effect -- and for some reason they decided to let a sort of "down in the dumps at the time techie" who is a pretty good writer -- uh, that would be me -- be one of the few who started the moderation ball rolling. At the time if ya let someone know you were one of the moderators or abused the privilege --> poof no more moderation for you bucko!

    Within weeks /. rose out of the dregs to become a site I still participate in from time to time, that I am proud to call part of my daily web experience, and that has shaped quite a few important debates, from the DCMA to SCO and a lot of ground in between. And I got to play in their sandbox and try to make a little difference in the world along the way. [They even tell me I have excellent Karma. :-) ]

    I want to point at one more accomplishment over the last few yearsthat really deserves a standing ovation: on 9/11/2001, Slashdot was the only major news feed on the web that didn't crash due to overload, and this on technology and bandwidth that was way way WAY behind what we have now.


    So, anonymously from a long time /. reader: thanks Malda and crew. Here's to as many more years as you choose to be the king of the sandbox.

  41. Who modded that "interesting?" by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    meta-meta-meta-meta....

  42. www.slashdot.org by TechwoIf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When will http://slashdot.org/ come out of the dark ages and grow up to http://www.slashdot.org/ ? http://www.slashdot.org/ has been down for years. Could some of you early ones fill in on the story behind this strangeness?

    1. Re:www.slashdot.org by CmdrTaco · · Score: 5, Informative
      I can explain that... I have a philosophical problem with 'www'. 'www' is redundant... 'www' implies that this is a web site. Web sites communicate using the http protocol. So to have 'http' and 'www' in the same URL is redundant and needless. I used to refer to it as The Cursed WWW, or TCWWW. you don't need to say ftp://ftp.sitename.com because it's REDUNDANT. You're wasting letters and time dammit! So to this day I always try to redirect people from 'www' to the base domain name.

      Unfortunately this causes problems with domains & cookies. A cookie set by foo.domain.com is invisible to domain.com, so if you login while viewing 'games.slashdot.org' you aren't necessarily logged in to 'slashdot.org'. And this all really sucks because apparently advertisers seem to think that if it's not in the URL, it's not part of the content of the page. This context sensitive advertising thing is responsibile for an awful lot of stupid URLs that just make it harder to share information through meatspace.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    2. Re:www.slashdot.org by ipb · · Score: 1

      And I couldn't agree more.
      I've been on that particular soapbox for years and it ticks me off when I give someone a url without www and they insist on adding it, then telling me the site is broken.

      grumble grumble grumble ...

    3. Re:www.slashdot.org by gowen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're showing your youth now. In the days when raw computers were regularly attached to the internet, www.domain.com could be a DNS alias for whatever machine at domain.com (inevitably either frodo.domain.com or bilbo.domain.com) had been configured to have the NCSA web server on it. No-one would consider redirecting any port 80 traffic to a dedicated web server. Thus www.foo.com became the default, easy-to-remember name for "the webserver at foo.com".

      An nslookup on "domain.com" would frequently not even return a valid IP address -- and why should it, that's a domain not a machine, and domains got IP ranges, while individual IP addresses were allocated to machines.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    4. Re:www.slashdot.org by TechwoIf · · Score: 1

      I'me not sure where it started from. But I though the base domain name was for e-mail, witch uses the MX field to direct it to the right server. Or other things that are "serverless" where the domain name is just a starting point, like e-mail and domain registration. If having more then one server decated to a service, www, ftp, etc. makes sense to make sure the URL went to the right server without having to install a decated firewall hardware to redirect ports to the sperate servers. Allthough now a days with all the social networking sites springing up, www does seem to be the stone age now where large sites now split the site across separate servers, like "images", "static", "user", and the most hated one of them all, "ad|adserver|flashad"

    5. Re:www.slashdot.org by ximenes · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you have a hostname like www.slashdot.org you don't need to specify the scheme in order for people to know what to do with it.

      My biggest problem with 'www' is that its a pain in the ass to say in person. But http:/// is a bigger pain. Going beyond that, whats the point of having different TLDs if you basically have to get the .com version?

      Oh the Internet, what will we do with you.

    6. Re:www.slashdot.org by jayhawk88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      So basically what you're saying is that even though it causes confusion and problems for your users and advertisers, you'll never change it because technically it is superfluous. If this isn't the heart and soul of a *nix user distilled into one post I'm not sure what is.

    7. Re:www.slashdot.org by AdamThor · · Score: 2, Funny

      So to have 'http' and 'www' in the same URL is redundant and needless.

      ah, I think I understand and comprehend.

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    8. Re:www.slashdot.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmmhh.... meatspace!

    9. Re:www.slashdot.org by archen · · Score: 2, Informative

      "In the days"? Heh, I still find all sorts of sites with broken DNS in this way. Typically these are mis configured IIS sites that display "no website configured at this address" or something similar. Add www and presto it works. In college I saw many people scratch their heads trying to get websites to work. Whenever I suggested they add or remove www they all thought I was crazy. Usually the problem was just a matter of lazy DNS setups.

    10. Re:www.slashdot.org by gatzke · · Score: 1


      Why not do some redirect thing the way slashdot.com points you to slashdot.org? I get a 404 for slashdot.com right now.

      Checking now, it looks like www.slashdot.com also points you to slashdot.org...

      Wouldn't the cookie still come from slashdot.org after the redirect?

      You might actually catch more hits with tards that put in www.slashdot.org...

    11. Re:www.slashdot.org by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this causes problems with domains & cookies. A cookie set by foo.domain.com is invisible to domain.com [...] I think that's fixable, if the spec is correct:

      * A Set-Cookie from request-host x.foo.com for Domain=.foo.com would be accepted.

      Seems like prepending a dot should make it magically work, but then again the browser makers have all sorts of wacky security rules so it might not...
    12. Re:www.slashdot.org by CmdrTaco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      yeah you can do .slashdot.org but back in the day (not sure if it's still true) some browsers would not let 'slashdot.org' get at a cookie saved to '.slashdot.org'. Cookies were a really shitty standard for a few years there.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    13. Re:www.slashdot.org by RudeDude · · Score: 1

      I had the same fundamental problem with the redundancy of TCWWW. I swore several times, and never followed through. To start a web site that always redirected to http://qqq.domainname.com/ . Note this also "solves" the cookie problem. ;-)

      Of course, I never ended up doing... ah well. Good times back in th elate '90s. Oh and my Everything(2) node http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=383 registration date makes me feel fairly old too. I jumped on when the DNS information got leaked and got myself a nice "RudeDude" graphic rendered before the box crashed and the feature was turned off.

      --
      RudeDude
      Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
    14. Re:www.slashdot.org by spydum · · Score: 1

      Another reason people put websites on "www.domain.tld" and not just "domain.tld" was the way mail is handled if there was a "domain.tld" A record in DNS. Some old-fashioned or misconfigured SMTP servers would attempt to deliver to the host at "domain.tld", instead of checking the MX record, which could end up with some misdirected email. Poor reasoning, but still that has been the answer I've received from a few older shops that still act in this manner.

    15. Re:www.slashdot.org by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      So to have 'http' and 'www' in the same URL is redundant and needless. ah, I think I understand and comprehend. Your comment is superfluous and unnecessary.
      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    16. Re:www.slashdot.org by nege · · Score: 1

      awwww man you beat me to it!! Malda is even older than me and I knew that! :P

    17. Re:www.slashdot.org by caferace · · Score: 1

      Of course, I never ended up doing... ah well. Good times back in th elate '90s. Oh and my Everything(2) node http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=383 registration date makes me feel fairly old too. I jumped on when the DNS information got leaked and got myself a nice "RudeDude" graphic rendered before >the box crashed and the feature was turned off. Ah. I'm about two hours off of you at everything http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=757 and
      probably two hours ahead of you here. Long time no see. :D
    18. Re:www.slashdot.org by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this causes problems with domains & cookies. A cookie set by foo.domain.com is invisible to domain.com, so if you login while viewing 'games.slashdot.org' you aren't necessarily logged in to 'slashdot.org'.
      That's why you should be using slashdot.org/games instead of games.slashdot.org, man.
    19. Re:www.slashdot.org by CmdrTaco · · Score: 3, Funny
      according to advertisers, I should be using games.slashdot.org/games/games.html?games=games

      I'm only kinda exagerating ;)

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    20. Re:www.slashdot.org by kayditty · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, it implies that this is a web server (not exactly a "web site"), but why would FTP.SITENAME.COM or SMTP.SITENAME.COM or DNS1.SITENAME.COM be a web server? Oh. They wouldn't (most likely). Right.

    21. Re:www.slashdot.org by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I've got the opposite philosophical problem. slashdot.org is a domain. It cannot be a machine. I agree it's weird, weird, weird that people came up with the idea that "in our domain, there will be one webserver machine, and its name will be www." But even still, machine's gotta have a name. :) And if a domain is going to have only one machine connected to the http web, then www is the conventional name for that machine. But I'd like to see more character for that. star.slashdot.org app.slashdot.org spock.slashdot.org main.slashdot.org

      I'd also like to see the DNS system used more hierarchically, as it was designed. Especially within my own company's intranet, but that's a pipe dream.

      Of course, I years ago just accepted that the best way to make sure Slashdot always worked is to make sure I go to slashdot.org. The only change in years since then is http -> https.

  43. Early Adoption by StormReaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't remember when (or how) I first came upon Slashdot, but it was in the early years. I used it for a long time before registering for an account, simply to rebel against what was then deemed to be an unacceptable invasion of privacy (I was quite paranoid back then). If I had known how horny the hot chicks got over low Slashdot IDs, I would have registered far earlier -sigh-.

    1. Re:Early Adoption by grazier · · Score: 1

      You're telling me, I was probably one of those addresses from ibm.com he talked about in his summary, being one of the few IBMers that even knew how to use the Internet back then. To think I could have been slashdot royalty.

      I didn't sign up for the same reasons. To top it off I rarely posted out of fear that the company would not have liked it (my early years and around the time some others got fired for a little too much nature watching. It wasn't until the first time we had a virus popping up and no one knew what it was until I knowingly jumped on here to see a discussion about it, that I felt comfortable visiting/posting; it saved us time and money, and that's an easy sell to business types. The number of ibm.com hits went way up since that day I'm sure.

      --

      G

      "Plurality should not be posited without necessity." - William of Occam
    2. Re:Early Adoption by NoseyNick · · Score: 1

      I thought *I* held out for a long time (19946). Sir, I admire your staying-power. :-)

      --
      Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
    3. Re:Early Adoption by !eopard · · Score: 1

      bah, no willpower there at all! I started reading /. in early 2000 (still pretty late I guess) when I was really *supposed* to be testing software that was being developed by a different division in my workplace. I think it took 6-7 years before I felt it was time to contribute back to the community :/

      --
      Boolean logic: True, False, and File not found.
    4. Re:Early Adoption by elvesrus · · Score: 1

      look at it this way, you only have 5 digits ;)

  44. by Anonymous Coward (1) * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in the day, I was TERRIFIED that I wouldn't get my name in a site registry, or a webmail system. The Internet was small enough you could register almost everywhere "important".

    Yeah me, too. That's why I made sure I was the original Anonymous Coward at /.

    (In most other places, I'm the original Anonymous and IP Logged).

  45. Why does this story remind me of the following... by Potatomasher · · Score: 1

    One way to get rid of them is to tell 'em stories that dont go anywhere. Like the time we went over to shelbyville during the war, I wore an onion on my belt....which was the style at the time...you couldnt get those white ones, you could only get those big yellow ones.................now where was I........oh yeah, the important thing was I was wearing an onion on my nelt, which was the style at the time, you couldnt get those...

    --
    A million monkeys and this is the best sig they could come up with...
  46. Re:Oh, CONGRATULATIONS! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    You are a sparkling conversationalist.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  47. Easy way to get more historical info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fellate the man! Don't just do it in text, put your actual lips to work!

    You're halfway there already, so you may as well make the attempt.

  48. I want mine back! by mccalli · · Score: 1

    Scorpion. That's the account I originally signed up with, and I've totally forgotten the login details and probably don't have access to the email address anymore. I try every so often to convince the admins to unlock it for me, but no joy.

    Ian

  49. Big fishes in small seas by heroine · · Score: 1

    Back then anyone could B a big fish in a small sea by working on Linux programs. Not so anymore.

  50. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kadaffy is still a Colonel, after all.

  51. Personal experiences :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In those days the content was a lot more personal then it is today.
    Oh good. For a long time it seemed like you were updating us on lots of personal experiences. And then nothing.

    It was either that you stopped informing us on those details
    or
    that you haven't purchased more underpants since August 24th, 2000.

    Then again, it could be both...
  52. Re:Crass self-promotion of a for-profit site. by cout · · Score: 1

    Post it on "slashdot"

  53. Re:Crass self-promotion of a for-profit site. by drakaan · · Score: 1

    ...actually, there's already a site like that. It's called "slashdot.org".

    Oh, and "In soviet russia, slashdot complains about YOUR stories".

    --
    "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  54. As an old-timer .. by torpor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. I yearn for the days when I would get a personal message from Cmrd. Taco and the gang, just for posting something smart to their new website.

    Ah, those were the days. Before 'blogs' (what a horrid term), before 'wiki' (oh even worse...), before the push and the pull and the stagnation. Before hot grits. When you could check the site every *two days* or so, and not necessarily miss a story.

    Oh, slashdot, you are a tempestuous mistress, but how we love you well ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:As an old-timer .. by christurkel · · Score: 1

      I have been here since 1999 or so and Slashdot has had its ups and downs (Back in those days every Linux kernel release was news, c'mon!) but overall I'd say its stayed solid all these years

      The problem has been dupes, a lot in the last couple of years, intentionally inflammatory headlines/summaries and links to news stories that are clearly (even with a casual glance) non newsworthy (I mean does Zonk actually read the stories he posts?).

      But I still love it and its my first stop in the AM.

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    2. Re:As an old-timer .. by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      Ah, those were the days. Before 'blogs' (what a horrid term), before 'wiki' (oh even worse...),

      The first Wiki was started in 1995. 'Weblog', the less horrid precursor to 'blog' was coined only a few months after the start of Slashdot.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  55. 10 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet you still haven't learned the difference between "then" and "than." Sigh.

  56. Re:So leave, cunt. by drakaan · · Score: 1

    First of all, mods, that shouldn't be "-1 flamebait". Second, Erich, it's refreshing to see that even people with 3-digit userids get suckered into confrontations with trolling ACs.

    I tip my hat to you, sir!

    --
    "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  57. The Future of /. by AdamThor · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the future, slashdot will have a flying car!
    In the future, slashdot will achieve sentience! AI researches predict this is less than 5 years away!
    In the future, androids will do all the work for the editors!
    As miniaturization continues, in the future slashdot will move to 8 pt. type!
    In a year and a half, slashdot will have twice as many transistors as it does now!
    In the future, slashdot will be ready for the desktop!

    etc... I'm sure you can come up with your own...

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  58. Where are they now? by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

    There are, obviously, thousands of people who registered in the four-digit era. They were certainly on the leading edge then -- why do we only see a few of them around these days?

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    1. Re:Where are they now? by fistfullast33l · · Score: 1

      I know it's un-Slashdot like, but reading the other comments above you shows that most of them lost their passwords or stopped reading/writing comments.

    2. Re:Where are they now? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      We're hiding. :-)

      And since when does posting on /. equate to being "leading edge"...? :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  59. It's true by J4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back when I first came here one could read every comment from every story posted and still have spare time.

    1. Re:It's true by Castar · · Score: 1

      Back when I first came here one could read every comment from every story posted and still have spare time. Wow... What did you do at work, then? ;-)
      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
  60. congrats! by belial · · Score: 1

    it's been pretty cool watching /. grow into the monster-that-it-is-today over the years. might have to check out the local party.

  61. I tried... by fluffhead · · Score: 1

    I tried to be UID 32k (32,768) but missed by 179. Nah, j/k. It was sometime late '98 or early '99.

    At least I beat Wil Wheaton though. Nyah nyah!

    --

    #include "disclaim.h"
    "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak
    1. Re:I tried... by J4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did you ever notice how you never see Wil Wheaton and CmdrTaco in the same photograph?

    2. Re:I tried... by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny

      You also never see Wil Wheaton and Batman in the same photograph, either.

      Or Batman and Hitler, for that matter.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:I tried... by unitron · · Score: 1

      Did you ever notice how you never see Wil Wheaton and CmdrTaco in the same photograph?

      So what, lots of people avoid being seen with Taco :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  62. UID 43288... by wiredog · · Score: 1
    Bimbos of the Death Sun

    (Score:1)

    by wiredog (43288) on 03:52 PM May 26th, 1999

    And I probably posted that comment within a day or two of registering.

    1. Re:UID 43288... by ender- · · Score: 1

      Bimbos of the Death Sun

      (Score:1)

      by wiredog (43288) on 03:52 PM May 26th, 1999

      And I probably posted that comment within a day or two of registering.

      That can't be right. There's a post from Feb 2nd, 1999 from a user ID 95056.

      Plus, if you go to the Wayback Machine archive from November 1998 And click on the comments for the first link [The PPC Light storgy], the first post is by a user named xgray who has a user ID of 96047...

      Not sure if my research is accurate or not, but that's what makes me think I must have signed up in 1998.

  63. Posters and SVG of the logo? by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    Are there any posters to print out? If there are SVG's of the logo and other graphics we can make local variations.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  64. this place was sorta intimidating at first by spamking · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I first started checking /. out I felt a little out of place and it took a little time for me to register and post. But I'm glad I did. There's a ton of information floating around here and most of the members are helpful.

    Congrats on 10 years of service.

    1. Re:this place was sorta intimidating at first by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1

      Same here. I've been a pretty avid reader since 1999 but it wasn't until much later that I eventually decided to get a login. I still read a lot and post very little. I guess you're right, this place is kind of intimidating.
      Ah Slashdot, how often I have read you while waiting for some calculation to finish... Keep the good work going, guys.

  65. And I finally registered... by Ted+Stevens · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...just hoping that someday 1166671 will be a low id.

    1. Re:And I finally registered... by slap20 · · Score: 1

      I can't even remember when I registered, 4 or 5... maybe 6 years ago, I believe I was on a new *fast* 28.8k buad modem though. I'm a bit ahead of you, but I am still waiting for 168152 to be a low ID.

      -Eric-

      --
      ~Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder~
    2. Re:And I finally registered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they used Excel (//it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/24/2339203)to generate your Id

    3. Re:And I finally registered... by dman123 · · Score: 1

      Dear Senator,

      Aren't you going to blame the high ID on the registration getting stuck in the tubes? I mean, if you really did send that internet 10 years ago...

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    4. Re:And I finally registered... by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

      But then my Name won't be right. :-(

    5. Re:And I finally registered... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      You registered 7 years ago, around March of 2000. My first comment is from then.

  66. Don't forget online BBS postings by tjones · · Score: 1

    That's where I saw the "ads" for Chips 'n Dips.

    I seem to remember several other people telling you to knock it off, too. They're gone, you're here.

  67. Thanks for the Memories by agent00013 · · Score: 1

    I've enjoyed reading this site for years since around 1998 or 1999. It helped me become the geek I am today. Somehow I didn't manage to get a CS degree, but it's helped me keep in touch with the tech sector, learn about PHP, Perl, MySQL, etc. Even though I may not have the diploma, I can manage to run a server and host a number of different webistes.

    For the most part, I'm an Anonymous Coward and rarely contribute to the discussions, but I appreciate Slashdot nonetheless.

    Thanks for the many years and I hope to keep reading for many more.

  68. That's not the history we want to know! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    That's all very nice, but where do the polls come from, and who decides the CowboyNeal "funny" choice is actually funny?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:That's not the history we want to know! by u38cg · · Score: 1

      They decided at one point CowboyNeal wasn't funny, and removed it. The uproar that resulted was approximately equivalent to two SCOs and four DMCAs, with a side dish of Trusted Computing. It was returned.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  69. #006666 by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    One of the first sites I made about 5 years ago used a colour scheme based on #7ab and somehow it stuck. ...I wish I'd picked an easier to remember hex code now :(

  70. Chicks? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Why do you want horny birds? That's sick. [grin]

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  71. Re:Low ID Roll call (12047) by newfmike · · Score: 1

    WOw, I thought I got in on the game late! Probably early 98. I think most of the owners of numbers below 10000 have already grown old and died.

    --
    "Posessing a degree in science does not necessarily make one a scientist"
  72. Re:One of the 400 still anonymous, still moderatin by satadru · · Score: 1

    With all due respect to /. - Fark also stayed up on the morning of 9/11.

  73. 1998 in 1999 by Chuck+Milam · · Score: 1

    I believe I registered in late 1998 or early 1999. I remember liking that my account number was the same as the year (or close enough)and therefore easy to remember...

  74. I found Slashdot in Oct. 1998 by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 1

    I was looking for security related sites and forums and came upon Slashdot after a while. After reading a few articles and admiring the place I was hooked.

    The years flew past and I got caught up in one of the infamous mass-bannings from a while back. I'm pretty sure that it's all in the past but I still can't get any mod points in this account, which is a shame.

    --
    All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
  75. Same ol, same ol by Average · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't be the only sub-5-digit Slashdotter who still works in the same building, same floor (different office number) that I was ten years ago when I registered.

    I swear, I'll finish my thesis one of these days (grin)!

  76. I was early, but not *that* early by Sanity · · Score: 1
    I was a CompSci student at Edinburgh University, and was into WindowMaker and Enlightenment, but I don't think that is how I first found Slashdot. As I recall an uber-geeky friend of mine introduced me to it.

    Ah them were the days...

  77. the good ole days by boss_hog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't let my "high" ID fool you, I was also one of those who lurked on slashdot since the early days. I remember when the user accounts were started. Earlier in this discussion someone asked to gauge how long it took to hit certain milestones in slashdot uid #'s. I would say it was between 2 and 3 years before we hit 200k, based on how long I seem to remember reading slashdot before thinking to myself, "well, dammit, I really ought to get to making a user id, before these numbers get too big". Yeah, it took me that long to decide to create an account. This is like my 3rd slashdot comment in 10 years. I am a lurker extra-ordinaire.

    anyway, that's a side point to my main question:

    who here remembers the little text box form Taco had on CnD, that let you send a message to his console?

    Taco, I wrote you maybe a dozen times or so, usually like 4 or 5 messages all at once within about the same number of minutes... I can't remember a single thing that I wrote to you through that little one line form, but I hope you got a laugh out of it. oh, and Hamster Havoc still rocks.

    --Josh

  78. Grew Up by waldoj · · Score: 1

    We grew up. :) Few of us have the time that we did then. We're married, we have kids, mortgages, etc.

    1. Re:Grew Up by general_re · · Score: 1

      We grew up. :) Few of us have the time that we did then. We're married, we have kids, mortgages, etc. Mortgage, kids...fuck, I own a minivan now - how sad is that? ;)
      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  79. Re:Crass self-promotion of a for-profit site. by feelbad_feelsgood · · Score: 1

    This site should be called /./.

  80. The Genesis of Anonymous Coward by crumley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is that really the way Anonymous Coward started? If so, my memory is failing.

    I remember that there was a user that called himself Anonymous Coward in the days before user accounts. I thought that he wrote some pretty decent, though sometimes trollish, posts. Then there were all kinds of problems with people impersonating other users (especially Bruce Perens). So user accounts were created. When the accounts were created, the name "Anonymous Coward" was appropriated from people who weren't logged in. Some claimed that this ticked off the original AC, though no one could tell for sure.

    Anyway, if anyone else remembers any of that, please back me up.

    --
    Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    1. Re:The Genesis of Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're probably recalling a weird dream or an eerie alternate reality. None of that is even remotely true in this dimension.

      The Anonymous Coward, the only non-user user of slashdot, was begotten of CmdrTaco before all ages of slashdot, begotten, not made, being one substance with the Internet, and at the end of slashdot he shall rise with glory and judge all users, the quick and the dead, and his kingdom shall have no end.

      I know because I was there. Any questions?

    2. Re:The Genesis of Anonymous Coward by rsadelle · · Score: 1

      people impersonating other users (especially Bruce Perens)
      Oh, the ambiguity of language. I haven't been here long enough to know if you mean that people were impersonating Bruce Perens or that Bruce Perens was impersonating other users.
    3. Re:The Genesis of Anonymous Coward by crumley · · Score: 1

      Ah, let me clarify. People impersonated Bruce Perens, leading him eventually to start technocrat.net

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    4. Re:The Genesis of Anonymous Coward by Stormie · · Score: 1

      Then there were all kinds of problems with people impersonating other users (especially Bruce Perens).

      Yeah but we could generally sort that out by asking the real Bruce Perens to please stand up.

  81. Mod parent DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want to see this guy modded troll for once :D

    1. Re:Mod parent DOWN! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I want to see this guy modded troll for once :D If you search (or pay for history?) enough, there are many comments of CmdrTaco got modded down. I don't know what happened to those moderators though ;)
    2. Re:Mod parent DOWN! by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      They get blacklisted and don't ever get mod points again. Trust me, I know. I committed the "sin" of upmodding something that
      was critical of Slashdot once, about 6 years ago, and haven't had a modpoint since.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    3. Re:Mod parent DOWN! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      They get blacklisted and don't ever get mod points again. Trust me, I know. I committed the "sin" of upmodding something that
      was critical of Slashdot once, about 6 years ago, and haven't had a modpoint since. Are you sure about it? Once upon a time, a gang of a popular Linux IRC client guys didn't like the fact that I found out they were looking for my comments to moderate down (yes!) and bragging about it on IRC, they did another trick.
      They reported my IP as suspicious activity (e.g. massive flood etc) to Slashdot admins and the guy got tricked, preventing me to ever post again until I took time to say "some idiot must have tricked you, check my IP,you won't find it on any RBL even" and got fixed.
      If you are active on Slasdot or any site and you don't agree with popular opinion, any massive abuse may happen.
      I don't think there is a childish admin to "ban" you from moderating, I think there is an idiot or gang of idiots delibarately somehow reported you.
      Of course there is a chance of I am being naive...

    4. Re:Mod parent DOWN! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I hardly ever get mod points. There seems to be some rule about people who post a lot not getting mod points often (it makes sense too; I rarely use mod points when I get them, because I'd rather post). If I go on holiday away from Slashdot for a week or so, I usually have some when I get back.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Mod parent DOWN! by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      I'm reasonably sure. It's fairly well known that Slash has a feature for blacklisting people from moderating, and it's an amazing coincidence that I was regularly getting mod points up until that one day. And now, 6 years or so later, I haven't had a single mod point since then. I'm pretty sure it was out and out blacklisting.

      That's OK though, it's their site and they can make whatever rules they want. It's fucking stupid, IMHO, but it is what it is...

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    6. Re:Mod parent DOWN! by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      In my case I went on holiday. Without a laptop or any web access. My mod points expired and I have never seen any since.

      At least I *think* that caused it.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  82. I remember... by Slurpee · · Score: 1

    I worked a helpdesk at CSE (Computer Science and Engineering) at UNSW (Uni of NSW - that's in Oz folks) in the days of Rasterman.

    Had several students ask me the URL for slashdot.org. My theory was - if they had to ask, they don't need it.

    ahhh - those were the days.

  83. I would guess by prisoner · · Score: 1

    that I started reading /. around 2000. I was working at a web startup then and it was about the only thing that kept me sane. That does sound like a strange thing to say....

  84. 10 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SlashDot is only 10 years old? I thought it was older than that; that's only 11000 months...

  85. Slashdotter since 2000 by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    I first encountered Slashdot in 2000 when I started a new job. We did, among other things, two-way paging systems, and had a setup that forwarded various things to our pagers. This included new headlines, weather forecasts, and something new and mysterious (to me) called Slashdot.

    In 1997 I had not yet heard of Slashdot, but was a regular customer of a new upstart Internet business called amazon.com. I first started playing with the Internet in 1987, when I considered myself fortunate indeed to have a 9600 baud SLIP line so I could access email, newsgroups and ftp sites.

    ...laura

  86. I never did . . . by hawk · · Score: 1

    . . . figure out why people were doing that rather than using killall in their xterms--but then, my giving up lynx as my primary browser is a fairly recent event (I'm told that the bug that forced the change has been fixed).

    hawk

  87. Congratulations from Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me whats incredible to be able to read slashdot in my mobile phone. I added /. on RSS feeds in Opera for mobile.. Now I can read /. in the subway, in the bus, at every street.. cool!. After many year reading /., beeing able to read it everywhere was incredible.

  88. WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by drachenstern · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why don't the user pages have join dates? After reading through a large portion of this thread (during class, my apologies to all, CmdrTaco gets it) I realized that most of us don't realize how long we've been reading this site, much less how long we've been _officially_ contributing.

    Just thought I would tag your comment and hope for a reply shortly.

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
    1. Re:WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by CmdrTaco · · Score: 4, Informative

      because we didn't log that information for like 5 years ;)

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    2. Re:WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      lol, so now I bet ya'll are smacking yourselves in the forehead, huh? (or did at one point more or less five years ago)

      So if we start a subscription, can we see all the way back to the beginning of our posts (if we're after the import nightmare that ya'll suffered) (I know, everyone at OSTG wants us ALL to have subscriptions, but ya know how it is)

      - thanks for the response CT

      - congrats indeed for the dream and the reality

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    3. Re:WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Someone once posted a rough timeline on one of those "look out how my user id is!" "no, look how low _my_ user id is!" threads, giving you a general idea of the timeframe you registered based on your user id. I don't have any link to it (it was ages ago), but if a distributed effort were made, I imagine you could come up with a pretty accurate mapping.

    4. Re:WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      If memory serves. I first started visiting Slashdot in late '97, probably no earlier than late November or early December. As i recall registration occured sometime in early '98 and, yes, I hesitated a day or two.

      I remember when the actual karma value was shown.

      What a ride it has been. Congrats on the first decade, Rob.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    5. Re:WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by BJH · · Score: 1

      I spurned registration for a week and look what happened :(

    6. Re:WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by Phil+Gregory · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Slashdot didn't have user accounts for a while, so using "account creation date" would be wildly inaccurate. Case in point: I started reading in late 1997, well before user accounts. When the accounts were added, I registered one early enough to get a four-digit number, but that date would be wrong by more than a year for determining when I actually started reading.

      --
      355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation!
    7. Re:WAY OT, don't recall seeing in FAQ by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Speaking of karma, I've managed to go somehow from good to excellent relatively quickly (past six months to a year, if memory serves), and I don't recall how. Have they changed the contribution + moderation -> karma conversion lately?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  89. didja ever have a rocketmail account? by drachenstern · · Score: 1

    That was a sad day to find out RM was being consumed by Yahoo!

    Had Y! even kept the interface, probably I would have been ecstatic. Instead, I had to wander aimlessly from HoTMaiL to Y! accts till that glorious day when I got my shiny new GMail acct.

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
    1. Re:didja ever have a rocketmail account? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      I still have a RocketMail magnet somewhere in the house, from one of those awful Internet Meetups from the mid-late '90s.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    2. Re:didja ever have a rocketmail account? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I still do. I log into Yahoo! Mail with .rm My wife does too!

      mailto:jcorneli@rocketmail.com

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:didja ever have a rocketmail account? by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Wow, I got so pissed when they took away my interface and gave me what was a crappier interface at the time that I let it go. That's been, what, 10, 11 years ago now? If only I would have known it was going to be a badge of honor at some point to retain that login.

      I also had had the same ID on most every network at that time, so I only had the option of using drachenstern.rm@yahoo.com at the time of the conversion, which I thought was stupid, because I didn't know/understand at the time that the rocketmail domain was going to carry over. Alas, I've let all but hotmail and gmail go by now, so there's those two that I've had now since before forever (it would seem), but all the others are long gone. Especially since most services have a 1 year inactivity policy.

      What is funniest to me about the whole thing is that the one account that is the "backup" to all the others is yahoo, and when I setup that account, the "backup" would've been rocketmail, but even now, I don't remember if they had to have an alternate email addy way back then. So any other account that I might be able to "re-surface" might be doable, since they all link back to my Y! acct. And since I let the Y! original drach acct go, the others are all non-recoverable. Alas...

      But really, I was bummed about the interface going buh-bye. I suppose I should just get it over with and setup my own MX and ?-sendmail||exchange||???-?**. I heard that's what the really cool geeks are doing. And setting up community discussion based sites with UIDs but no sign-up dates...












      &&HAHA, I'm a dork, and anyone who disagrees hasn't ever read anything by me, or talked to me, or anything.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  90. A good read by Super+Jamie · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that, always nice to read a story from the annals of internet history. The web's just not like it used to be...

  91. Quite a history by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 1

    Hell, I was just getting into the Internet and it's series of tubes back in 1997. Can't say I was ever around for the old school BBS days but I was certainly around for the days of dial up and Netscape being the browser of choice compared to IE.

    Glad to see /. is still going. Been reading it a few years now. Best site for geek related news in my opinion. It's not bloated or anything compared to other sites and it hosts stories on damn near everything geek related, video games, science fiction tv shows & movies, computer stuff etc It's like the best summarization of the internet in one site. An aesthetically pleasing layout, not a ton of intrusive ad's or flash banners, simple and to the point. Really enjoy it ;) Here's to hoping we get another 10 great years.

    --
    Aw Frell this
  92. Re:Oh, CONGRATULATIONS! by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah yes, RFC1149. What a glorious upgrade from the rock network. Basically, in the old days, you would chisel your message onto a stone, preferably a small one, then lob it at your neighbor, and he would read the address, then throw it in the direction he thought it was supposed to go, and so on until it infrequently arrived at its intended destination. There's an ugly rumor that some 80% of the lost packets can be found at the bottom of Lake Wobegon as the result of a malicious MITM attack.

  93. how do i get my low low uid back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i registered, have a login, but its for an email address at my very first job.

    i dont remember my first password scheme - how do i get my low low uid back? I can recite the email, but it bounces (company was on dial up, mail through uucp then, I moved the server from AIX to slack)...

  94. I'm mostly a lurker myself. by darkcmd · · Score: 1

    I'm another one of these people that have been reading Slashdot for quite some time without registering an account here. I've been reading the site since about 1999 or so.

  95. Jon Katz has gone? by natslovR · · Score: 1

    After someone recommended unticking him as a poster in the options his stories never bored me again.

    I completely forgot about him and that his posts would annoy me - Sure i didn't have to read them, and once that box was unticked i never did again.

  96. unpronounceable URL by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The URL was meant to be unpronounceable by anyone -- a joke ultimately that has backfired on me countless times when I'm called and asked what the URL is to the damn thing.

    Backfired another way, too.

    I was told about Slashdot by Hugh Daniels (verbally) during a busy time, when I had GAFIAted from conferencing systems but might have picked up participating again for a good one. Thanks to the confusing and unpronouncable name I didn't end up getting around to joining it for some time (couple years?) after. (Thus my five-digit user number.)

    Now perhaps there are some (like my "freaks") who don't think that was a backfire. B-) But I suspect there are a lot of others, many valuable, who didn't find and start participating until much later than if the site had been named differently.

    Or who never participated at all. B-(

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  97. over 1 million served by aidian · · Score: 1

    over 1 million user accounts now kinda blows my mind. that's awesome. I spent many a day.. and afternoon.. and night... clicking /. waiting for new stories, hoping there'd be something new to look at and maybe comment. I have a fairly high UID for back then, but knowing that there's 985,000+ people who signed up after me is kinda awe-inspiring. Congratulations on 10 years, slashdot and CmdrTaco.

    What's also amazing is that the level of trolling here seems like nothing compared to the likes of Digg and friends nowadays. A real conversation is actually almost kind of possible, so far as a bunch of still socially-backwards computer dorks are able to manage not to piss each other off too badly.

  98. Wayback Machine by Frankie70 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Chips and Dips from the wayback
    machine.

    Early slashdot pages.

  99. Happy 10 /. by jjohn · · Score: 1

    From your old pal UID=2991. It's been a trip. Especially that whole Columbine article. That's when I knew /. had more social capital than was probably advisable.

  100. Congratulations Slashdot! by Steven+Borrelli · · Score: 1

    Congratulations!

    Wow, the years have flown by. In the 10 years since I started reading this site, I've had:

    -4 Jobs
    -2 Kids
    -1 Wife

    And yet slashdot has been part of my life all that time, as I still visit several times a week. For me, the lowest point was the W. Richard Stevens debacle, and the high point was the release of the Netscape source code.

    Thanks for giving me such a great reason to avoid work!

  101. MIT.com? by kayditty · · Score: 0

    ..or even MIT.edu! That'd be crazy.

  102. Congrats Taco by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Taco, I just want to wish you all the best in the next 10 years. I've enjoyed Slashdot ever since I was introduced to it in 2002. I've even had a few articles published to your main page, and got a few first posts in my glory days ;-)

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  103. Re:Oh, CONGRATULATIONS! by airos4 · · Score: 1

    Try using Ask Slashdot on an abacus. And I didn't realize how many friggin digits the UID is up to these days.. I actually feel vaguely honored that I only have a five digit one, some of these suckers look like they got in after the first few quatloos had already registered.

    --
    I wish there was a choice that said "Factually Wrong -1" when I mod.
  104. Re:One of the 400 still anonymous, still moderatin by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    I want to point at one more accomplishment over the last few yearsthat really deserves a standing ovation: on 9/11/2001, Slashdot was the only major news feed on the web that didn't crash due to overload, and this on technology and bandwidth that was way way WAY behind what we have now.


    I actually found out about the planes from the chat applet on slashdot's languishing sister site, Everything2. Remember when Slashdot used to put superscript on some words in articles, and point to definitions over there?

    Oh, and speaking of losing mod ability, my original account, artifex (uid 18308) seemingly was blocked from moderating, though I could still metamod. So I started this one. They know, but don't care, sort of proving the arbitrariness. I wasn't one of the 400, I was one of the ones in the scandal where some editor just started doing that to people who complained about others being blocked, or something.
  105. Slashdot UIDs by solprovider · · Score: 1

    I started reading Slashdot early in 1998. I finally joined because I wanted to improve the layout: filter the homepage and show threads properly. I used my first name for a UID in the 79000s. I deliberately used my company email address so the registration would not haunt my permanent email accounts. Nobody cared about UIDs. I was not posting so I did not care about karma.

    I left that company in 2000. Returned to Slashdot the next year having forgotten my password. Waited a couple of months trying to remember before registering my current account. Slashdot posters had changed from mostly professionals to mostly college students, but moderation kept it readable.

    Would others correct/complete the timeline of UIDs?
    1998-01 1
    1998-03 23,000
    2001 600,000
    2002 800,000
    2005 980,000
    2007 1,100,000

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
    1. Re:Slashdot UIDs by JavaRob · · Score: 1

      Ah, right; I mixed up the dates... I couldn't have registered in '97, because it wasn't up yet.
      So, sometime in '98, though I have no idea when. Maybe others can fill in the details.

  106. Like the new logo... (no-ones mentioned it...) by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, I found slashdot because of Seti@Home....

    There were several of us at IBM who were running Seti@Home on our brand-new super powerful PII-450s - one of the guys emailed us the UserFriendly cartoon of Arthur formulating a plan to rescue Stef from Microsoft, but loosing a few cycles along the way. I ended up reading the entire UF archive. When I finished that I looked for something else to read and discovered this little teal button labeled "Slashdot"...

    That was eight years ago and I've never been the same...

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  107. Re:Low ID Roll call (12047) by unitron · · Score: 1

    I think most of the owners of numbers below 10000 have already grown old and died.

    Not really, although there are more and more days when it feels that way :-)

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  108. Slashdot URL by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    What does the name "Slashdot" mean?
    "Slashdot" is a sort of obnoxious parody of a URL. When I originally registered the domain, I wanted to make the URL silly, and unpronounceable. With this being a news site, I always kind of imagined the name of the site was a reference to the current directory - /. ('current' - geddit?)

    - although thinking about it that would be ./


    ...who reads FAQs anyway...
  109. #linuxos repruzent! by bug · · Score: 1

    Hey Rob, hard to believe it's been 10 years. I remember you pimping your new website on #linuxos in EFnet IRC 10 years ago. If only I had listened to you when you said that it was gonna be HUGE, and registered an account a little earlier. Then I could have had a two digit slashdot ID instead of my pathetic four digit one... and then the women would find me irresistible. If only... sigh.

    -Bugoid, a.k.a., Dave

  110. Hope College! by il1019 · · Score: 0

    woot. This is crazy. I didn't think anyone important went to Hope. I am currently a student (class of '09) and its awesome to hear that someone from Hope made it big (at least in my eyes). I read pretty much every story that passes through /., and i've been doing it for a year or two. Crazy to think it was at one time hosted on smaug (probably). now im curious. You know all about my world, VanZoren and Voorhees and the Kletz and all that goodness.

  111. I remember... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

    I remember a few things about the early days... before moderation, First Post!, back when we were an insular crowd. I got interested in Linux about the same time I found Slashdot. I was on Usenet as a Linux advocate dispelling fud and such from the MS marketdroids and fanboys.

    Someone on cola told me about Slashdot. It was Usenet on roids and way easier on the eyes. And yes, many of the fanboys would come to Slash and spew their FUD but hey, this was OUR forum where they were the outsiders. It's amazing how many of them still use the same playbook same arguments...

    I saw Linux go from: What the heck is that... an air conditioner? To: Oh yeah, isn't that some kind of application? To: We are implementing this new OS called Linux for our mission critical infrastructure.

    I remember hearing folks around the office constantly complaining about how they couldn't find anything on the internet... I told them about Google.

    I remember the vibrant tech sector where new and fantastic things were being announced on a daily basis. I remember Linux going from having almost no support whatsoever to having just about every powerful relational database backend support it. Got to watch the whole thing unfold - heady stuff.

    That Slashdot is still here and so am I. I will be here as long as the great stories, great posts and insights, and witty comments are to be had.

    Hats off to you Rob,

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  112. Re:Low ID Roll call (12047) by The+Man · · Score: 1

    Man, I was dead before you were even born!

  113. Yeah, late to the party by Carl+Jacobsen · · Score: 1

    I originally found Slashdot through a screenshot on the Enlightenment site that showed the front page for Chips & Dips... took a while to track down that it had recently moved to slashdot.org. I recall when they added uids (and kick myself every once in a while now for not registering sooner), but didn't see much point until some preferences were added, tied to the uid (I think it was that it would remember your score cutoff for browsing, if you browsed while logged in).

    They used to post some pretty weird stories occasionally, back then. Anyone remember the lengthy writeup about how JWZ had died? Complete with fond rememberances from RMS and others? And then Taco saying, "No, no, it was a joke, see. Wasn't it funny?"

  114. Re:*laughs* Ah, it's UID time. by McKing · · Score: 1

    Unless I get hit by a car, I will outlast you on /. !!!

    I really wanted 1024, but I couldn't time it just right...

    --
    If only "common" sense was actually that common...
  115. crusty old memories by jswatz · · Score: 1

    Man, y'all are making me feel old. I remember flying out to Michigan in 2000 for a story about Slashdot back when I worked at the Washington Post. We ate, we talked, I wrote, it was fun....

    --
    "speaking only for myself since 1957"
  116. CHecking in... by psychosis · · Score: 1

    just thought i'd check in with the 4-digit uid club. kudos to the decade!

  117. Still Here by DG · · Score: 1

    I remember being seriously pissed that /. wanted me to register a userID for the site. I don't remember what it was that made me do it, but it took me a while to just bite the bullet and register. I coulda been a 2-digit!

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  118. 1998 by Shimmer · · Score: 1

    I first found the site in 1998 when a work colleague (and Linux-head) pointed me to it. I liked the site well enough to sign up, but was discouraged when I realized that the site already had over 1000 users! I created an account anyway, even though I was sure the fun times were already over since the site was so large.

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  119. ding! by newr00tic · · Score: 1

    The fact registered users get (or can choose to get) a notification when there is a reply means that the discussion system is actually a discussion, rather than just a load of people spouting opinions.

    *ding!*

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.