Slashdot Mirror


iPad Is Destroying Netbook Sales

Hugh Pickens writes "Fortune magazine reports that sales growth of low-cost, low-powered netbooks peaked last summer at an astonishing 641% year-over-year growth rate but netbook sales fell off a cliff in January and shrank again in April — collateral damage, according to Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty, from the January introduction and April launch of the iPad. In support of Huberty's theory, she offers a Morgan Stanley/Alphawise survey conducted in March which found that 44% of US consumers who were planning to buy an iPad said they were buying it instead of a netbook or notebook computer. In related news, Apple announced that it sold its one millionth iPad last week, just 28 days after its introduction on April 3. 'One million iPads in 28 days — that's less than half of the 74 days it took to achieve this milestone with iPhone,' says Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. 'Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.'"

911 comments

  1. Whatever it taks! by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    says Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. 'Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.' Steve -- have you tried using Pixie Dust?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Whatever it taks! by negRo_slim · · Score: 0, Troll

      says Andrew Kent, Slashdot Poster. 'People are idiots.'

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's really funny to me how when presented with technology they don't understand, people call it magic. I guess I like it though, it does wonders for my ego and self esteem to know that I'm not the most ignorant person in the world, by a longshot.

    3. Re:Whatever it taks! by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most of the people on slashdot are not truly ignorant; instead they primarily fall into the "brilliant but really annoying" category.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Whatever it taks! by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      He better not use any, the patent for pixie dust is owned by IBM

    5. Re:Whatever it taks! by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
              Arthur C. Clarke, "Profiles of The Future", 1961

      "Any sufficiently rigorously defined magic is indistinguishable from technology."
              Larry Niven

      "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
              Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law

    6. Re:Whatever it taks! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. Which is why you're never going to sell a million of anything you make in your life.

      Slashdot slams Apple every single chance they get.
      "Locked to no Apps, no one is going to buy that"
      "No way to change a battery! No one is going to buy that"
      "No flash, no one is going to buy that".

      Please, someone stand up and accept the fact that you have no idea what drives the general public and that as much as you rant and rave, stuff sells.

      Remember, Less Space than a Nomad. No Wireless. Has Lamely become synonymous with an MP3 player. Apple is the 400 lb gorilla when it comes to online audio sales.

      There are a few Apple threads that I remember being some of the largest slashdot has ever had. It's like being turned down for a first date, you hate something so much because you refuse to accept the fact that maybe you're not the target demographic that you rant and rave about it and STILL miss the point.

    7. Re:Whatever it taks! by Ltap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're missing a distinction. We're trying to make the point that Apple products are crap and Apple supremacy is wrong, we're not saying it's impossible or even improbable. We just wish people didn't fall for their bullshit.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    8. Re:Whatever it taks! by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      "...Apple is the 400 lb gorilla when it comes to online audio sales."

      The room usually has an 800 lb-force gorilla in it. That one must be drinking fewer carbonated sodas these days.

    9. Re:Whatever it taks! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      bullshit

      No, you're wrong. Bullshit is companies like SCO, or Microsoft's blatant historical use of vaporware to instantly demolish other companies.

      The fact that you can't make that distinction is why you don't get it, and use exactly the same hyperbole you accuse Apple of, is why the Apple haters are just as fucking tedious as the fanbois.

      Being popular may not make it right, but it doesn't mean you couldn't STFU and go buy some Apple stock or something.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    10. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish the slashdotter add on for firefox still worked or that slashdot would build it into their site.

    11. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, /. was saying the same thing about MS products many years ago. It hasn't changed a thing nor will it with the Apple stuff.

    12. Re:Whatever it taks! by BlueStraggler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Careful, you are in danger of making his point through use of unintended irony.

      It may be "crap," "wrong," and "bullshit" but according to the market, it's still head and shoulders above all the other crappy bullshit that is flogged by Apple's competitors. This is where the nerd cognitive dissonance tends to kick in: "If *I* think it's crap, but the marketplace thinks it's vastly superior, the only way to resolve this paradox is to assume that the marketplace is profoundly stupid and duped by Apple's svengali-like marketing. Because it couldn't possibly be that I don't have a freaking clue what people want."

    13. Re:Whatever it taks! by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Slashdot slams Apple every single chance they get. "Locked to no Apps, no one is going to buy that" "No way to change a battery! No one is going to buy that" "No flash, no one is going to buy that".

      From what I've seen, the usual sentiment was that it would sell hugely like every other Apple product. They themselves being giant nerds didn't need or want it, but plenty of casual users would.

    14. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is slamming Apple, just pointing out the downfalls. Everyone here knows what happens when a vendor has too much control as evident by Microsoft and no one wants to see that happen again. With Apple they have control over everything from hardware to software. If I want to download software I have to go through Apple. I want to replace my dying battery I have to go through Apple. So we aren't slamming Apple, we're just warning people about control to prevent another Microsoft.

    15. Re:Whatever it taks! by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      "brilliant but really annoying"

      Both are overstated IMO

    16. Re:Whatever it taks! by repka · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thinks the more slashdotters are on iPads, the better? It's way easier to troll with real keyboard, like I'm doing right now.

    17. Re:Whatever it taks! by nabsltd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If *I* think it's crap, but the marketplace thinks it's vastly superior, the only way to resolve this paradox is to assume that the marketplace is profoundly stupid and duped by Apple's svengali-like marketing. Because it couldn't possibly be that I don't have a freaking clue what people want."

      I believe the US elections of the past few years show that as long as the average consumer is distracted by shiny toys, nothing else makes any impact on their brain. Apple products are the ultimate in shiny toys, thus, they are wildly successful.

      There are many other shiny toys that target people with more money than brains, and most are also wildly successful: almost every heavily advertised movie or video game (regardless of actual quality), "premium" automobiles that are just re-badged versions of cheaper makes, and, of course, casinos.

      I think anyone (including /. readers) should be proud if they are not one of the sheep, but rather a thinking human being. Even if you are an Apple fan (which means you likely aren't a big thinker...I kid) it's pretty easy to figure that an iPhone plus some other device (netbook, eReader, etc.) is a better bang for your buck than an iPad.

    18. Re:Whatever it taks! by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Thom Holwerda over at OSnews disects the story thus>:

      Also in the report, Huberty has a chart which shows the decline in netbook sales growth per month, year-over-year. The chart shows that year-over-year, the sales growth of netbooks is on a steady decline. In July 2009, netbook sales increased by a staggering 641% compared to the same month a year earlier. This is the kind of idiotic growth that's simply unsustainable.

      From July 2009 onwards, the sales growth of netbooks has been declining - note, however, that sales are still growing, only at a more comfortable, less hype-like pace.

      Basically, this is a non-story and yet more baseless hype for Apple's gadget.

    19. Re:Whatever it taks! by node+3 · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, the usual sentiment was that it would sell hugely like every other Apple product. They themselves being giant nerds didn't need or want it, but plenty of casual users would.

      Not true. The anti-iPad crowd did not generally say, "plenty of casual users would". They were, "at launch, a bunch of fanboys will, but then it will die off".

    20. Re:Whatever it taks! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Careful, you are in danger of making his point through use of unintended irony.

      It may be "crap," "wrong," and "bullshit" but according to the market, it's still head and shoulders above all the other crappy bullshit that is flogged by Apple's competitors. This is where the nerd cognitive dissonance tends to kick in: "If *I* think it's crap, but the marketplace thinks it's vastly superior, the only way to resolve this paradox is to assume that the marketplace is profoundly stupid and duped by Apple's svengali-like marketing. Because it couldn't possibly be that I don't have a freaking clue what people want."

      Brilliant post. Applies to so many things. I'm going to have to copy it down so I can reuse it later and claim it as my own.

    21. Re:Whatever it taks! by c++0xFF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the point we're trying to make is that technically-minded people see the shortcomings in Apple products compared to others.

      The problem is that people pay attention to their hip friends, not to the nerd with the broken glasses sitting at the front of the class. That nerd feels put-down because nobody listens to him.

      I don't think many people here seriously believe that "nobody will buy the iPad" -- on the contrary, it's easy to see that some people will buy any device that Apple makes and some will buy it because they don't care about the technical shortcomings ("it's good enough").

      That doesn't make Apple products "the best (computer|mp3 player|phone|tablet|etc) in the word" ... but it does make the product successful.

    22. Re:Whatever it taks! by Azureflare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eating spam is also a bigger bang for your buck. No one does it because it tastes like crap.

      Apple products may be derided as toys, but so what? Are you saying you don't like playing with shiny gadget toys? What kind of geek are you??

    23. Re:Whatever it taks! by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I agree.

      Slashdoters may be smart folk, but as for predicting what technology will become established, we have a pretty bad track record. Especially concerning Apple.

      My two leading theories are:

      1) Slashdot is a very skewed sample of the general population, but like most skewed samples, thinks it is typical.

      2) Slashdotters secretly have a crush on Apple and want to take it behind the firehouse and get it pregnant.

      No idea which is the truth.

    24. Re:Whatever it taks! by abigor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OS X is the only viable desktop Unix out there, and the Macbook hardware is great. Please tell me how the tool I use to earn $95 an hour as a programmer who deploys to Unix is a "toy". Thanks.

      Oh, while you're at it, post what you do for a living, what tools you use, and how much you make. That's assuming you have a job, of course.

    25. Re:Whatever it taks! by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      I've adjusted your post to reflect reality...

      "Locked to no Apps, no one is going to buy that (except Apple fanboys)"
      "No way to change a battery! No one is going to buy that (except Apple fanboys)"
      "No flash, no one is going to buy that (except Apple fanboys)"

      Now, I'm an Apple user (I own 2, a Macbook for my wife and a Mini for me) but I'm hardly a fanboy. I bought the Mini because one of my clients required software testing to be performed on OSX, and the Macbook so I didn't have to disinfect my wife's computer weekly.

      I completely agree with all of your (slashdot derived) points above, but you're forgetting the fanboys and the brand loyal. I liked my iPod until the battery died and I had to dismantle the thing to replace it, so that's a valid point for me - I won't buy a product that doesn't have a user replaceable battery. No Apps - not an issue with the Mini or Macbook, using Crossover and VMWare I have a wide selection of software to choose from. No Flash, I'm not a fan of flash, but there are times that it becomes useful so this is also a valid point for me.

      Will I own an iPad? Unlikely - unless I receive it as a gift.
      What will I use? Likely that I'll continue to use my Thinkpad T61 until I get something more powerful, or I might consider a WePad when they become available.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    26. Re:Whatever it taks! by abigor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny thing - go to any Unix conference, filled with probably some of the nerdiest people ever, and check out the laptops people have. Hint: they aren't Dells running Linux.

    27. Re:Whatever it taks! by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      You can take a crap in a box, slap a warranty on it, but all you get is a guaranteed piece o'sh*t

      -And if it sells and people want it I will start feedingmyself more fibre and keep producing said guaranteed Shit.

      Marketing isnt about the best product, marketing is all about making the buyer want what you have, no matter what it is.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    28. Re:Whatever it taks! by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Yet you continue to assume people buy Apple products just for the 'cool factor' when obviously they buy them because the features fit their needs. Although i'm certain there are people who buy them as a popular/fad item, those kinds of fads do fade and they move on to something else. Given that the satisfaction rate with Apple products and the % of folks who would buy again are tops in the industry, I wouldn't classify it as a 'fad' purchase.

      http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Desktops-and-Notebooks/Apple-Again-Tops-HP-Dell-in-Customer-Satisfaction-377579/

    29. Re:Whatever it taks! by dean.collins · · Score: 1

      LOL - have you read how many people are saying "this ipad is great and I just cant wait to get a keyboard for it". FTW - it's called a Notebook. Read here why Jobs is going to make Murdoch look like a genius. http://blog.collins.net.pr/2010/05/ipads-with-keyboards.html

    30. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "brilliant" moniker is over-used. There aren't that many truly brilliant people in the world and I certainly wouldn't classify "most of the people on slashdot" as deserving of that description. Mostly clever or smart, yes; mostly brilliant, not so much.

    31. Re:Whatever it taks! by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think most things would make more sense if geeks coupled it to the fact that most consider their users to suffer from id10-t or PEBCAK problems. While that's not really true either, most people don't want a "computer" the way us geeks look at a computer. They don't want to know about CPU and RAM and GPU and so on, it's kind of like asking them to assemble a car by what engine, transmission, brakes and exhaust system go together. They want a car that solves a transportation problem. => limited models

      Likewise with Apple's walled garden, honestly already people DO NOT know how to use their gizmos. Most of them will never ever see the fence, and if they do it'd feel tiny like the borders of North Korea. Geeks are like running full speed towards it and go like "See, there's a fence there" while others are like "Ok whatever, but what's everything else I haven't explored like? There *are* 200k apps here that do all sorts of cool shit." As many have said when they suggest a computer or internet driving licence, people don't know how to administrate their own systems. They depend on others whether it's their geeky kids, friends, family, computer shop or the support line or whatever. What the geeks are saying Apple takes away is something they already feel they have very little knowledge and control over. => don't care about lockdown

      Also, geeks have a blind spot for missing user interface disasters, but common users have a blind spot for missing back end disasters. We try something, realize it's crap and move on. They try it, struggle, struggle some more and think computers are really, really hard or that they are dense. They have huge learning costs and only understand function, not concept so each application is almost like new to them. Users like being put in front of one piece of good software, it does not have to be the ultimate software of all time but better than trying to figure out which of five open source clones are actually any good. This is why they always ask for "brand" products like Photoshop, they don't know good from bad but assume that with a famous product it's as easy as it'll get. => iEverything

      Apple makes products for the huge group who doesn't "really" want the complexities of those products, which turns out to be most of us. I have to admit that while I'm insanely geeky in some areas, for example my washing machine has more than a dozen programs and 95%+ of the time I use the basic 40 degree program. My photo camera has a bunch of manual settings but 95%+ of the time I just want to use the intelligent everything. Kinda like the Wii, I've managed to get even my parents to try it. They wouldn't touch PC or console games with a 10 foot pole. Any product you make that lets "everyone else" use something will be a huge hit. Just admit you're not in the "everybody else" category.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    32. Re:Whatever it taks! by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      The WePad looks good but I like the Touchbook http://alwaysinnovating.com/home/
      The Touchbook runs Linux, with Open Source, Open Hardware and Open Community. The only problem is it could take them 2 months to deliver the touchbook.

    33. Re:Whatever it taks! by robot256 · · Score: 1

      Even if we try not to let it show irl, /. is where we geniuses come to vent all our pent-up superiority complexes. Thus, to all the other superiority-complexed geniuses, we appear to be idiots. It's really pretty funny to watch in action, when you think about it like that. [goes back to laughing at all the idiots who think they're so smart.]

    34. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the people on slashdot are not truly ignorant; instead they primarily fall into the "brilliant but really annoying" category.

      Except for the "brilliant". I'll grant "slightly above average".

    35. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're missing the point. What people are complaining about isn't OS X, it's the lack of it. The iPad runs a useless locked down OS derived from OS X but not OS X. The decision to lock down the OS and force developers to go through Apple's App store is what has geeks turning sour on Apple. If the iPad ran regular OS X everyone would be saying it was brilliant (or at least they would 3 generations from now once they add all the missing features).

      And since you want to measure cocks^H^H^H^H^ jobs. I own 2 small companies, both of which use Macs for everything except servers (the servers are FreeBSD). Those Macs run OS X 70% of the time Windows XP and 7 about 29% of the time (does it run in IE6?) and Linux 1% (whenever someone drops a hard drive). I don't get paid by the hour, but if I did it would be a hell of a lot more then $95. Suffice to say I won't be buying any iPads, because they are useless.

    36. Re:Whatever it taks! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Apple makes the worst of all possible products. Except for all the rest.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    37. Re:Whatever it taks! by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      You, too are simply a sheep in a flock. You're just on the other side of the fence from the Apple lovers. Yes, *you* think everyone is stupid but you. Now - Where have I heard *that* before? Got any Apple stock? I didn't think so.

    38. Re:Whatever it taks! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia says:

      Gorillas move around by knuckle-walking. Adult males range in height from 1.65–1.75 metres (5 ft 5 in–5 ft 9 in), and in weight from 140–200 kg (310–440 lb). Adult females are often half the size of a silverback, averaging about 1.4 metres (4 ft 7 in) tall and 100 kg (220 lb). Occasionally, a silverback of over 1.8 metres (5 ft 11 in) and 230 kg (510 lb) has been recorded in the wild. However, obese gorillas in captivity have reached a weight of 270 kg (600 lb). Gorillas have a facial structure which is described as mandibular prognathism, that is, their mandible protrudes farther out than the maxilla.

      You're more right than you know.

    39. Re:Whatever it taks! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Sure I guess if Britney Spears can sell, so can the iPad. Is it a good thing that either sell? Definitely not. But such is life, generally the nice looking thing wins out over substance.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    40. Re:Whatever it taks! by Requiem18th · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other words Apple is not the way to go if you tend to Think Different.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    41. Re:Whatever it taks! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes I am, actually. My Macbook Pro is a nice machine, but its batteries wear out so fast that I eventually decided to just get a Dell netbook with Linux instead of replacing the battery all the damn time (and having to triple-boot the MBP). I'm typing this on that netbook, which gets 4-5 hours of battery life after almost a year of use and can be used to program on Linux.

    42. Re:Whatever it taks! by ET3D · · Score: 1

      But anti-Apple people also ignore all the good things about Apple products.

      Apple makes good hardware. People who like Windows buy Macs and run Windows on it because they like the design (Apple haters usually complain about Mac prices, not their design). Apple broke new ground with touch on the iPhone and still has the best touch hardware. It created an interface for the iPhone that everyone then tried to immitate -- and not just because it sells, but because it's a really convenient interface to use.

      People buy Apple products because they're good products. They're sometimes inferior in some aspects. They're usually more expensive than a non-Apple product with similar specs would cost. But on the whole, yes, Apple does make "the best whatever in the world" at the time of release. The iPad is the best tablet currently available, for most people. It's only inferior to unreleased or imagined products.

      Disclaimer: I never bought an Apple product, though I've seen an iPad and found it much more impressive than I thought I would. I'm unlikely to buy one, though. I'm not dead set against Apple products, but my geek tendencies do tell me to try other options first.

    43. Re:Whatever it taks! by Risen888 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't buy that for a minute. So Apple's sold a million iPads. Whee. According to this article, there were 33.3 million netbooks sold last year.

      It cracks me up when reports like this come out and everyone starts screaming about how Apple's taking over. No they're not. They're not close. They've never been close. They'll never be close. It's not what "everyone wants." The million people who will buy any stupid goddamn thing Apple sells bought iPads. Those million people are by no means "the general public." So in short, who the hell cares? In consumer electronics, a million units hardly even registers on the scale.

      Let's play with the data a little bit. Let's assume for the sake of conversation that iPad sales continue at this rate. I don't think they will, but let's go with it. In three months, they've sold a million. By year's end, that makes four million. Four million units is roughly 12% of the netbooks sold last year. I don't know what your definition of "taking over" is, but in my book that doesn't cut it.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    44. Re:Whatever it taks! by Risen888 · · Score: 0, Troll

      according to the market, it's still head and shoulders above all the other crappy bullshit that is flogged by Apple's competitors

      Hell no it's not. There were 33.3 million netbooks sold last year. When the iTampon even begins to remotely approach that number, give me a call. Apple's not exactly taking over here.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    45. Re:Whatever it taks! by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      Most geeks I know (including myself) aren't saying "No one is going to buy that". The whole reason I think it's a disaster is because it totally sucks (due to reasons you mention and more) and *huge* numbers of people will buy it. That's precisely why I find it so alarming.

    46. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, used to be, everyone worshipped apple and sucked off jobs every chance they could get, and bashed microsoft instead..

      that was a year ago.

      now it seems to have somewhat reversed.

    47. Re:Whatever it taks! by mjwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny thing - go to any Unix conference, filled with probably some of the nerdiest people ever, and check out the laptops people have. Hint: they aren't Dells running Linux.

      Lenovo tends to be slightly more popular then Dell, mainly due to the fact that the hardware is rock solid, easily cooled for long periods of time and the keyboard/touchpad is far more comfortable to use for long periods of time. That and every model of Dell looks different.

      When I spend 6+ hours on a plane, I'm glad I have a Lenovo and a spare battery. The nipple mouse is far easier to use when in a confined seat and the vehicle is prone to shaking.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    48. Re:Whatever it taks! by Draek · · Score: 1

      They don't want to know about CPU and RAM and GPU and so on, it's kind of like asking them to assemble a car by what engine, transmission, brakes and exhaust system go together. They want a car that solves a transportation problem. => limited models

      Personally, I believe that if we took anybody who didn't know how an engine, transmission, brakes and exhaust system work off the roads, the world would be a far better place. And if you're wondering, no I don't know the first thing about it, which is why I'm a happy pedestrian.

      It's not "geekery" to know how to use the tools you own, it's simply being a rational human being and it's sad people are trying to pretend otherwise. The drive of Joe Average to try and compensate for his ignorance with money is just pitiful, in the computing industry as well as everywhere else.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    49. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing - go to any Unix conference, filled with probably some of the nerdiest people ever, and check out the laptops people have. Hint: they aren't Dells running Linux.

      I've been to a few of them. Mostly just normal laptop's running FreeBSD and such.

    50. Re:Whatever it taks! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Techies often don't know a crap product when they see it because they're so used to putting up with problems where a normal person wouldn't. Many techies are like mechanics who just love their old Jaguars, and love its engineering, even if it breaks down often and requires a lot of maintenance.

      If you think Apple makes crap products, and not just products that don't always suit a niche for more advanced users, then I think you have a poor understanding about what role technologies serves in society.

    51. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the "they must be stupid" argument is BS. There are plenty of techies who prefer OS X because it's easy to use. Usability isn't just for dummies, it's a quality that anyone can appreciate, like using a well-designed tool.

      And why would I want a netbook or eReader rather than an iPad, which will do a better job for me? Or let me guess, I must be one of those stupid people? Great argument there.

    52. Re:Whatever it taks! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that normal people see the shortcomings of products designed by techies. The techies are blind to those problems because to them it's normal. It's like someone who's proud that they have to push start their car, since it implies that it's not some modern auto that can't be push started.

    53. Re:Whatever it taks! by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Useless to you. Me - I'd love to have an iPad. I have a MacBook Pro, I don't use it to earn a living but I code websites on the side and programming projects for fun, and churn statistics related to me job. Prior to getting the Mac I used Linux exclusively for 6 years: Debian then Ubuntu. When I'm not doing real work, I like to sit on the couch and browse Facebook, reply to emails, chat on whatever IM is popular this month, browse online news, check out movie trailers. I'd *love* to have an iPad if I had the spare cash.

    54. Re:Whatever it taks! by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      +1

      couldn't have said this better. You hit the nail right on the head.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    55. Re:Whatever it taks! by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      There are times when I would much prefer a touchscreen to a netbook, but maybe I'll hold off until some decent Android tablets come out. Better still, a netbook with a touchscreen (running the full linux, not a cut-down-mobile-OS). Only problem there is I'd be stuck between Android (with better touchscreen support and better mobile suitability) and something like Ubuntu Netbook Remix, where the touchscreen wouldn't work so well...

      I dont care what people think of the iPad. I know if I bought one it would just sit there collecting dust. To use it, either one hand has to hold the damn thing or it sits in your lap at an angle that isn't ideal for viewing the screen. My take on it now is the same as when I first saw it. What would I use it for (that I cannot already do better/easier)?

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    56. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I code websites on the side

      This is where you lose all your credibility.

    57. Re:Whatever it taks! by SakuraDreams · · Score: 1

      Most people don't need an ultra-portable PC. Most people just need a toy to do a little bit of web browsing (FaceBook), some IM and some portable entertainment. Those people don't need a netbook or an ultraportable PC like a tiny C2D Vaio or similar. A netbook with a decent SSD (eg Toshiba), a reasonable amount of RAM and a 1.86 GHz Atom or dual core 1.66 will be more than enough to run a VPN connection, IM, Skype, web browser, Open or Microsoft Office, Adobe Acrobat (not reader), Photoshop, Lotus Notes, etc and be as fast as most current laptops - at least my VersaPro UltraLite from NEC is. So this just proves that most people use laptops and netbooks as toys and not as work or productivity devices.

    58. Re:Whatever it taks! by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I could sell dirty socks of my feet for $500 given Apple's marketing budget.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    59. Re:Whatever it taks! by shiftless · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, the point we're trying to make is that technically-minded people see the shortcomings in Apple products compared to others.

      The problem is that people pay attention to their hip friends, not to the nerd with the broken glasses sitting at the front of the class. That nerd feels put-down because nobody listens to him. ......and is it any wonder? Tell the nerd you're considering an iPad and ask his opinion and he'll spend 30 minutes ranting and raving about DRM, proprietary lockdown, etc. Ask the trendy hip guy and he'll show you all the neat stuff you can do with it. Try developing some social skills and drop those haughty, arrogant delusions of grandeur, and I bet the world will be a lot more inclined to listen to your viewpoint.

    60. Re:Whatever it taks! by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Personally, I believe that if we took anybody who didn't know how an engine, transmission, brakes and exhaust system work off the roads, the world would be a far better place. And if you're wondering, no I don't know the first thing about it, which is why I'm a happy pedestrian.

      It's not "geekery" to know how to use the tools you own, it's simply being a rational human being and it's sad people are trying to pretend otherwise.

      -1 for most laughably stupid comment of the day. You state your opinion on this subject as if anyone truly gives a damn, or should care, especially since you just admitted you don't know the first thing about the subject and thus are unqualified to have ANY opinion on it whatsoever.

      I'm an expert mechanic so I understand full well how an engine, transmission, etc work. To expect your average driver to understand any more than the very basics is absurd, especially with how extraordinarily complicated today's cars are.

      Likewise for expecting them to understand computers, for the same reasons. I assume that's where your analogy was heading. Your post is stupid and self-serving.

    61. Re:Whatever it taks! by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Mod parent up. How many of these same people who are always bitching about how much "Apple sucks" run XFCE on their desktop and dont bat an eye at having to edit configuration files to accomplish minor, trivial, everyday desktop tasks?

    62. Re:Whatever it taks! by Calinous · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if someone doesn't know about Maxwell electro-magnetism, we shouldn't let them use a microwave oven. Or an incandescent light bulb if they don't know the physics of radiation. What about them using electricity from a nuclear plant without them knowing nuclear physics? Or mobile phones without knowing a thing about transistors, logic circuits, liquid crystals, the physics of Lithium batteries?

    63. Re:Whatever it taks! by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      We're trying to make the point that Apple products are crap and Apple supremacy is wrong,

      citation needed

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    64. Re:Whatever it taks! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      You must be reading a different Slashdot to me. We get multiple advertisement "stories" on the Iphone/Ipad daily. And we get ludicrous assertions that any drop in netbook sales must be because of the Apple tablet, and no other reason, or product.

      Remember, Less Space than a Nomad. No Wireless. Has Lamely become synonymous with an MP3 player. Apple is the 400 lb gorilla when it comes to online audio sales.

      And Windows is the most dominant operating system, so according to your logic, anyone who claims it's lame must be wrong. You really want to equate dominant with being the best? Not that this has anything to do with the Ipad, which isn't dominant - despite what people here will pretend.

    65. Re:Whatever it taks! by cfeedback · · Score: 1

      It cracks me up when reports like this come out and everyone starts screaming about how Apple's taking over. No they're not. They're not close. They've never been close. They'll never be close. It's not what "everyone wants."

      And /. represents what everyone wants? Not even close.

    66. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Holy shit!

      This is one of the cuntiest posts I've ever seen on this site. Top three at the very least.

    67. Re:Whatever it taks! by L1feless · · Score: 1

      1 Million units in 30 days (rounding up from 28) Based on sales alone from now until December 3rd would equal 7 million units alone. In addition, I would argue that sales from December 3rd to January 3rd would either increase or maintain current levels due to the holiday rush. Lets just for arguments sake say from Dec 3 to Dec 31 is another 1 Million sold. That makes 8 million units sold from now until the end of 2010 based on the current sales numbers not decreasing. Now include the 1 Million already sold to date and that totals 9 Million since its release date by the end of 2010. That is 27 percent of sales not 12 percent. Mathematics aside I believe we need to take into consideration the fact that this is a new product and with any new product which has an established user base there will always be a surge in sales at the beginning (For example: XBox 360 & Wii). So to play a bit of a devils advocate I would argue that sales at this steep of a curve for the remainder of 2010 excluding November-December are unlikely. I am not saying impossible just unlikely. Something else to seriously consider here. Those Netbook sales are across multiple companies unfortunately I could not find the volume distribution cited in the article by company but unless a single Netbook manufacturer is selling 10 million+ Netbooks per year then Apple has a huge profit surge due to iPad sales. I would say yet another successful Apple product launch. Its to bad they haven't and won't sell one to me

    68. Re:Whatever it taks! by slick_rick · · Score: 1

      I have run Linux on my desktop since RH 4.2 and have not used Windows seriously since NT4. I program in a dozen languages well enough to have a significant patch in the Postgres optimizer. My phone is four years old, I've replaced the screen once and the battery twice. I'm about as geeky as they get, but certainly not a gadget or Apple freak, and yet I bought an iPad yesterday.

      Why? Because my wife's ancient iBook G4 is on it's last leg, and we have really come to love casual browsing in the living room. The iPad is not a computer, it is not terribly useful for general computing tasks. Anyone who has used one would understand this. It is however a gorgeous device that is braindead simple to use for its intended purpose. So much so that my 72 year old aunt, who refuses to touch a keyboard, actually surfed the web for the first time yesterday, and enjoyed the experience.

      Hate on it all you want, but in ten years the only people with clunky old computers with keyboards will be those who write for a living (code or otherwise).

      --
      apt-get install redhat please god - Me (take it easy, I love Debian)
    69. Re:Whatever it taks! by Ltap · · Score: 1

      ... suit a niche for more advanced users...

      This made me laugh for some reason.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    70. Re:Whatever it taks! by Ltap · · Score: 1

      All this is saying to me is that it looks like an attractive device to people who are afraid of computers. This doesn't prove that it's good, just that it looks good.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    71. Re:Whatever it taks! by Ltap · · Score: 1

      No, you're still missing the distinction. We're saying that, if Apple products suck, and people want Apple products, it's because they can't tell the difference between a bad product and a good one.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    72. Re:Whatever it taks! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Personally, I believe that if we took anybody who didn't know how an engine, transmission, brakes and exhaust system work off the roads, the world would be a far better place.

      But then the roads would be full of petrol-heads who think they have a divine right to drive everywhere at 120mph.

    73. Re:Whatever it taks! by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo".
      Neal Stephenson

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    74. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thinking, boy wonder. There are those who love complexity and the rest (most of us) who just want things to work out of the box. Apple tries to cater for the latter. They aren't always successful but some of the protection they fight for is to keep things simple.

    75. Re:Whatever it taks! by indi0144 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wh-Why would we need to compare a Thinkpad with some other Apple/PC product? :'( they are not in the same league, It's unfair, you're a bad person by comparing business machines to toys. What next? "I'm glad I have this Volvo truck to move this container full of hard drives, I don't know how I could do it with a Twingo" :)

      Speaking of real hardware, this is a tablet:

      http://www.takesontech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/x200t.jpg

    76. Re:Whatever it taks! by shiftless · · Score: 1

      LOL, I got modded flamebait...must have struck a nerve huh? resemble that much, moderators?

    77. Re:Whatever it taks! by countach · · Score: 1

      Apple fanbois bought the first generation iPhone. But then guess what. Sales went UP after that. They they went up again. Then they continued to go up. So I wouldn't just write it all off yet.

    78. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha buthurt Apple fag is buthurt

    79. Re:Whatever it taks! by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      I don't own any touchscreen devices at all, but if I did and it was hackable, I'd consider putting KDE on it. The Plasma netbook interface is really nice (a hell of a lot better than that horrid Ubuntu Netbook Remix), and it was designed from the start with touchscreens in mind.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
  2. After a month of daily use... by crumbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...I find the iPad to be a perfect web surfing device. Great for e-mail and watching video. I am actually considering selling my Macbook Pro, as it is starting to get dusty. That said, I wouldn't want to write a novel on it.

    1. Re:After a month of daily use... by Peach+Rings · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

    2. Re:After a month of daily use... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find the iPad makes a great cutting board. Great for dicing tomatoes and, uh... apples! I am actually considering selling my Rock Maple cutting board, as it reeks of onions anyway. That said, I wouldn't want to do all my kitchen chores on it -- I tried chopping onions, and wound up accidentally downloading porn!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:After a month of daily use... by atarione · · Score: 4, Funny

      "That said, I wouldn't want to write a novel on it."

      so yeah it is perfect if you never have to do any actual work =p

      oh #$%* now i'm kinda jealous of your never having to work lifestyle..... DAMN IT....

      sigh...

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    4. Re:After a month of daily use... by fruitbane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When un-crippled devices proved to complex to use and maintain. The average person doesn't actually need a full-on PC for most tasks. The said, the iPad is damn expensive for a limited computing appliance.

    5. Re:After a month of daily use... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      Try it.

    6. Re:After a month of daily use... by feepness · · Score: 1

      Friend of mine bought an iPad. It's already collecting dust according to him.

    7. Re:After a month of daily use... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm a ~$250 netbook with an OS that allows the installation of arbitrary non approved applications and the ability to install other OSs... Or a $500+ for a closed OS with no ability to install unapproved arbitrary apps.

      Two comments
      1) Dear Apple please save me from your followers
      2) This is the same phenomenon as Ed Hardy popularity

      Typed on my netbook, while listening to Pandora and running an office app to type notes for a final

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    8. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try it.

      Pay for it for me.

    9. Re:After a month of daily use... by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      The said, the iPad is damn expensive for a limited computing appliance.

      I think that's the problem. I understand the cool factor, but even a netbook is so much more functional than an iPad that I can't really see the justification of going with an iPad over a netbook, unless you're someone who absolutely, positively despises keyboards and knows you'll only use it for web browsing, iPhone-type games, and e-books. It's unbelievable to me that the iPad could overwhelm netbook sales with that kind of demographic.

    10. Re:After a month of daily use... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1
    11. Re:After a month of daily use... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Ahem. Sorry, did not make me 'thing', (wife does that). 'think'....

    12. Re:After a month of daily use... by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

      ...I find the iPad to be a perfect web surfing device. Great for e-mail and watching video. I am actually considering selling my Macbook Pro, as it is starting to get dusty. That said, I wouldn't want to write a novel on it.

      Well I wouldn't want to write much on a netbook keyboard either, but I don't really see them as competing. I'm sure the iPad is great as a pick-up-and-go browser and so on (I use my iPod Touch all the time, it's easier and faster than using a PC), but if I had to take one device away on a road trip it would be a netbook. I've stayed at motels where the wireless was poor but there was ethernet provided too, for instance. I can use it to back up camera memory cards. And a real keyboard is useful for emails.

      I suspect that if the world had only ever had iPad-style tablet PCs and Apple invented the netbook, people would be praising the brilliant design that cleverly combined the keyboard with a tilting stand, which also protected the screen when not in use.

    13. Re:After a month of daily use... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

      That does sound awesome - sit around all day, surf the web, read email, and watch video. If you can figure out how I can support my lifestyle on that, I am totally down to replace my Macbook with an iPad too.

    14. Re:After a month of daily use... by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      The real question is... will it blend?

    15. Re:After a month of daily use... by Antiocheian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a great device for such computing requirements.

      I wish your Macbook Pro a more demanding owner.

    16. Re:After a month of daily use... by fredmosby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got an iPad earlier this week and I haven't used my laptop since. A laptop can do more, but the iPad does everything I need, and it's much easier to use. Actually the screen size isn't a problem because I tend to have the screen closer to my face than a laptop.

    17. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what you are saying is that the ipad is worthless in your opinion, which is more relevant than the fact the ipad is doing very well. Slashdot hated the ipad but all of their misguided and out of touch opinions couldn't change the fact that the ipad is a good product from the standpoint of the manufacturer and the consumers who purchase it.

    18. Re:After a month of daily use... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that's the problem. I understand the cool factor, but even a netbook is so much more functional than an iPad that I can't really see the justification of going with an iPad over a netbook, unless you're someone who absolutely, positively despises keyboards and knows you'll only use it for web browsing, iPhone-type games, and e-books.

      There are a few use cases that aren't immediately obvious for a large handheld device with a very high-grade touchscreen. For instance, it makes an unbelievably nice VNC client.

    19. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is... will it blend?

      Yes it will.... After you fold it in half. :-)

    20. Re:After a month of daily use... by thepike · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes!

      But only after you break it in half.

    21. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Cool story, bro. Any more anecdotal evidence you want to throw my way in a sulking and pathetic attempt to dismiss the ipads success?

    22. Re:After a month of daily use... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Yes

    23. Re:After a month of daily use... by yankeessuck · · Score: 1

      This whole argument is severely weakened if the approved applications meet all or most of one's needs. Then we're not talking about limitations but what kind of utility one gets for the extra $250.

    24. Re:After a month of daily use... by Pojut · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agreed. If you are a hardcore gamer or programmer, then yes tweaking your system to its fullest can be a complicated affair. If you are just a normal user, then the average consumer computer (i.e. one that runs OSX or Windows 7) is extremely simple. If all you do is websurfing, it doesn't take long to learn how to push the power button, wait for it to boot up, and click on the icon for your internet browser.

      The fact that people find computers sooo complicated and need pictures that look like they were drawn for pre-schoolers makes me fear for society. Have we as a culture really become that goddamn stupid? Do we really need our computers to function like digital picture books?

      Oh noes, this one has words longer than four letters! Oh, and what the hell is this rectangular thing with the alphabet and a numbers on it? And what is this crazy contraption that slides around?

      Seriously. 20 years ago, something like the iPad being a great idea to simplify computing would have been believable. Now? It's just fucking pathetic.

    25. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      That's not even a good argument, but were it true, it would because Apple actually pulled it off better than any competition.

    26. Re:After a month of daily use... by rinoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Tiny screen?
      Not. Smaller than a 15.6" laptop? Sure but bigger or equivalent to most netbooks.

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      > no keyboard
      Really?! You point this out? Have you RTFM'd? On screen keyboard in landscape mode does fine for typing pretty long missives -- longer than this one. Bluetooth keyboards take you to the next level.

      It's really not "crippled" or "limited", not in the knee-jerk manner most consider. It's a nice productivity tool, and, it's a great device to have in the house or for travels. It does a ton of stuff.

      My favorite app? iSSH (with VNC tunneling support) ... now that's what I call crippled. Sigh.

    27. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot hated the ipad but all of their misguided and out of touch opinions couldn't change the fact that the ipad is a good product from the standpoint of sales figures and sales figures alone.

      FTFY. I can assure you, sales do not indicate a "good" product in any way, shape, or form.

    28. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      Any more bizarre personal pride in the success of a product you have nothing to do with that you want to throw our way?

      Settle down, Cujo.

    29. Re:After a month of daily use... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I think the thing that amazes me the most about that video is that even after bashing it against the blender a few times you can clearly see the on-screen keyboard through the cracks in the display. The iPad may be unusuable like that, but I think the fact that it is still running is incredible.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    30. Re:After a month of daily use... by paiute · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Friend of mine bought an iPad. It's already collecting dust according to him.

      The actual worth of an iPad aside, your friend has a new piece of tech which people are lining up to buy at full retail and is still in limited supply? And he is letting it sit idle? He is either imaginary or an idiot or has never heard of eBay.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    31. Re:After a month of daily use... by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Troll

      > When un-crippled devices proved to complex to use and maintain.

      If it weren't for the existence of the Macintosh, you might have a point.

      It's funny how the members of the cult need to trash the old messiah in order to elevate the new one.

      Last year they would have been slinging a different tune.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    32. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quicktime video?

    33. Re:After a month of daily use... by vonart · · Score: 1

      To that end, have you found a decent VNC client application for it?

      --
      The American Dream has too much grinding and the leveling makes no sense. -GameboyRMH (1153867)
    34. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well let's see, $800 for a device that just works or $500 for a bug-ridden, malware infestd M$ OS on a device that has no standards. I'll take the device that most people have chosen, the one that just works.

    35. Re:After a month of daily use... by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >> Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?
      >
      > Try it.

      I did. The trailer at Rotten Tomatoes wouldn't play.

      This is especially interesting because of the fact that Rotten Tomatoes was on the browser menu bar. It wasn't just something I picked off the top of my head with the intention of tripping the device.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    36. Re:After a month of daily use... by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try it.

      Pay for it for me.

      Go to the Apple store and try it.

    37. Re:After a month of daily use... by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      friend of mine bought a car. turns out he doesn't even use it!

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    38. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like how a toaster oven is good for making toast or bagel pizzas and stuff, but you wouldn't want to cook a 5 course meal with one. Do you swear and get mad at toaster ovens too? Dude, it's an appliance not a full computer.

    39. Re:After a month of daily use... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I think the people going out and getting these either have money to burn or don't realize that you can get a pretty decent and big laptop for the same kind of money.

      Marketing drives sales often times because consumers are too lazy to find out things for themselves or even read product labels.

      We're talking about a consumer culture where detailed nutritional information is no longer considered enough. We have to express it in a single number now. Of course this is highly bogus but that's beside the point.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    40. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apple Shill Moderators: The Movie: The Game.

      How is it a troll to bring up the price when the person I'M REPLYING TO said it was great for web-surfing and e-mail? Get your heads out of your asses, mods.

    41. Re:After a month of daily use... by dfghjk · · Score: 0, Troll

      But I know Macs are not too complex to use and maintain because Steve says they are intuitive. Have Macs suddenly become too complex for Apple customers?

    42. Re:After a month of daily use... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Because you never have down time right?

      You're sitting at your hand-built Linux box, writing 24/7 about how the iPad is a worthless product that no one should buy, right?

      When you come home from your 9-5 job in front of a computer, you sit in front of another almost identical computer to browse the web and check up on a few friends, right?

    43. Re:After a month of daily use... by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know of one guy that gets anything new. He has more money than he knows what to do with. He bought one and didn't know what to do with it and gave it to his kid.

      I know of another guy that is your classical conspicuous consumer and had to have one because it's the latest fad. He doesn't know what to do with it either and his is collecting dust.

      I know of someone else that managed to break theirs in half somehow.

      A lot of people have no clue about technology or what they can do with it and need to be led around by the nose.

      The rest of us know what the technology can do find a fascist locked down appliance limiting.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    44. Re:After a month of daily use... by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like most technology it is not for all people...

      I didn't buy an iPad because I don't need it, it doesn't fit what I want to do with a computer.

      However there are people out there that do things the iPad does well.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    45. Re:After a month of daily use... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I tried it when it came out 3 years ago. It's not any different, after all, than an iPhone.

    46. Re:After a month of daily use... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I have never owned a laptop with screen resolution as low as an iPad. How does moving the screen closer help with that?

    47. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Simple - the iPad is much more comfortable to use when you don't need those things. When I'm sitting at home reading the internet, maybe lying in bed or sitting on the couch, my laptop is terribly inconvenient. It's hot, it's heavy, and it's awkward. The iPad is light (well, lighter), completely cool to the touch, and I can toss it aside without worrying about it. It is so much more convenient for casual use that I haven't touched my laptop for anything outside of work for almost the entire month I've had the iPad.

      Oh, and as for flash - who here doesn't run flash block? When did we start liking flash?

      Now, the iPad is terrible for work - obviously right now there's no decent productivity software for it, but even if there was I wouldn't want to use it. You can pry my work laptop from my cold, dead hands. There are huge drawbacks to a touch screen device when it comes to actual content production. But when it's time for content consumption, the iPad is leagues beyond what your laptop can muster.

    48. Re:After a month of daily use... by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agreed. I work with over 100 high tech people and associate with at lease 300 more. Not an ipad in sight. They are useless to anyone with a brain.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    49. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wumpus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      It's spelled F-U-C-K.

    50. Re:After a month of daily use... by Panaflex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think it's a sign of the end-times... it's a leisure device, it's instant-on and easy enough for kids to use without messing things up.

      These people already have a computer for the heavy stuff...
      Most people just want to google a term, play a quick game, or set the kids up in the backseat for a movie.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    51. Re:After a month of daily use... by dfghjk · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did Flash suddenly disappear from the Web because Apple wishes it so? Why should the lies about the iPad's superior browsing experience stand? It fails at more than Flash support.

      "It's a nice productivity tool..."

      If there is anything the iPad isn't, it's a productivity tool. STFU fanboy.

    52. Re:After a month of daily use... by SiaFhir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      More likely, that million is mostly confused women.

      "Okay, so I bought this thing... now how do I install it on my underwear???"

    53. Re:After a month of daily use... by Warhawke · · Score: 4, Funny

      They won't let me in. My jeans are not sufficiently tight enough to be deemed a "cool cat."

    54. Re:After a month of daily use... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      These are the same things said about the Air when it came out. It, too, was a great device for when you had nothing to do except look good.

    55. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded up?

      They're not hard to find. You don't even need to live near an Apple store: I went to Best Buy and saw a whole table of iPads. I wouldn't assume that everyone who gripes about the iPad hasn't already used one.

      Yes, I tried one. I was not impressed. It was exactly what I expected: an iPhone that doesn't make calls and won't fit in your pocket. Typing on it was a joke, and the first site I tried in the browser -- an HTML+CSS+JavaScript application that works fine on desktops, and even on Android -- was an unusable mess.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    56. Re:After a month of daily use... by NekSnappa · · Score: 3, Informative

      RealVNC, and Mocha both are easy to setup and work well. Although RealVNC wants you to use their server on your computer, I believe that both will work just fine with OS X built in Remote Desktop. I've used Mocha with both 10.4 and 10.6.

      Beyond that there are a number of handy remote control/trackpad keyboard apps as well. I've tried both Hippo Remote, and Mobile Air Mouse. Hippo is functional but is very basic. Mobile Air Mouse does all the basics, plus right click functionality. It also displays the shortcuts in the dock of the host machine allowing them to be launched with a tap on the iPad touchscreen.

      Apples Remote Control app is out there too. But all it does is provide and interface with Front Row.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    57. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yakasha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.
      Or when I want to browse while standing for an hour on the train twice a day.
      Or when I want to just not carry around a 5lb brick everywhere I go when not working.
      Or when I don't want unblockable popups.

      ... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      You mean like a motorcycle instead of a car?
      You mean like a regular cell phone instead of a smart phone?
      You mean like a laptop instead of a desktop?

      Many people like to use whatever is appropriate to the task.

    58. Re:After a month of daily use... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why you would want a Macbook Pro at all. It's a real computer, and you obviously have no need for it. Are your parents rich?

    59. Re:After a month of daily use... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      You know, if you're holding it at less than arms length, I suspect it's a pretty usable screen size since it' about the size of a book. I see people use their CrackBerry's for Google, and you'll notice they've got an even smaller screen.

      As to flash, I don't have it installed on most of my browsers, so it's not like you're missing anything. I can't view flash on my current machine because I've chosen to do without it -- it' hardly mandatory. In fact, it's a bloody nuisance.

      If you're truly browsing the internet, you mostly don't need a keyboard for the most part.

      With a form factor more like a book, I can see sitting in a comfy chair looking up stuff on the internet or reading an e-book or what have you. And, with a purported 10 hour battery life, that's pretty good.

      I'm not going to run out and buy one, but I'm keeping an eye on them -- might be something to ponder in a year or so if they come down in price.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    60. Re:After a month of daily use... by Haxzaw · · Score: 2

      My vote goes to imaginary friend. Actually, an idiotic imaginary friend.

    61. Re:After a month of daily use... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      ...someone who... knows you'll only use it for web browsing, iPhone-type games, and e-books.

      Don't you realize that describes the majority of netbook users already?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    62. Re:After a month of daily use... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      In this economy, who can afford to? Heck, I can get five or six Nokia 770's on eBay for the cost of a bottom-end iPad.

      I realize wifi isn't good enough for some ... my wife got her Samsung Rogue with a GPS, web browser, e-mail, unlimited data plan, etc. for $65/month and no cost at all for the phone. What could an iPad offer her that she doesn't already have?

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    63. Re:After a month of daily use... by Pojut · · Score: 1, Troll

      it's a leisure device, it's instant-on and easy enough for kids to use without messing things up.

      Fuck that, I WANT my kid to mess his computer up. And when he does, unless it is something catastrophically, crazy messed up, he has to learn how to fix it himself.

      My dad did the same with me, and it has served me very well. Provide the basics, let them figure out the rest. Mistakes are the best teachers.

    64. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have a netbook and an ipad and for me the ipad is a much, much better machine.

      For one, it's battery life is astounding.

      Secondly, the build quality is superb. It feels solid. The netbook in comparison is too flexible and feels very cheap.

      Third, I like tools that do what they are designed to do well. For some, no flash is deal breaker. For me, I don't miss flash one iota.

      I use the ipad for watching movies, email, surfing, reading, and games. In other words consuming content (ack - I hate that phrase). For these uses, it's hardly a crippled device. At least no more crippled than, say, a Nintendo DS or an XBox. Different devices, different uses. Personally, I'm a fan of simple tools that do a limited number of things well.

    65. Re:After a month of daily use... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The larger screen makes it much less cumbersome to use than an iPhone (and I'm not just talking about reading; remember, the on-screen keyboard gets bigger too).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    66. Re:After a month of daily use... by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      When un-crippled devices proved to complex to use and maintain.

      If it weren't for the existence of the Macintosh, you might have a point.

      No, he still has a point. Macs may be less annoying than PCs, but they're still computers, and therefore, still overly complex and annoying. I've had Macs for six years back and I'd rather never go back to PCs, but I still get more than my fair share of beachballs, crashing software and distracting crap popups while I'm doing something else (I'm looking at your extension updates Firefox).

    67. Re:After a month of daily use... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I don't agree that it's "the perfect web surfing device"-- but not for the reasons you're going to get flamed for. People are going to call you crazy because it's a little screen, no Flash, no physical keyboard, etc., but after using an iPad for a while, that's not the stuff that bothers me.

      The real problem with the iPad as a web browsing device is in how it handles tabbed browsing. I browse the web in a particular way, and it's not quite linear. When I'm reading through a page, if I come across a link that interests me, I open it in a new tab in the background. Then I continue on reading the page until there's nothing else I want, and I close the tab. That automatically brings me to the next tab, from which I do the same thing. It's a very easy and natural way of processing things, and I barely understand the point of having multiple web pages open at the same time if you're not managing things that way.

      On the iPad, however, you don't really have tabs. Instead you can back into some other screen where all your open pages appear as thumbnails. Not only is the transition of moving in and out a bit slow and aggravating, but there's no way to open a new page in the background. If you "Open in New Page", it automatically zooms you out, opens a new page, and zooms into that page. Worse yet, a lot of times if you have multiple pages open and you switch from one to another, the page you've just switched to will automatically reload itself. ??!! The whole reason I'd want to be able to keep pages open in the background is so that they'll be all loaded up and ready to go. If I have to wait for them to load each time, then I may as well just bookmark them and avoid the whole shrinky-zoomy animation.

      Apple needs to fix that experience. Along with everything else, they have these nice big touchscreens, and the best way they can come up with to change between web pages is to press a button that zooms you out to look at thumbnails? We can't get functionality to have a quick 3-finger swipe take you to "next tab"?

    68. Re:After a month of daily use... by OITLinebacker · · Score: 1

      It's an SUV soccer mom sort of thing. It's a nice, safe, sort of thing that your average stay at home mom, grandma, etc. can use to check their email, myfacebookspace, watch youtube, and listen to the Beatles. If it had the ability to do the video iChat with other iPads or other macs, I'd make sure that it would be the next computer purchased for my grandparents, my parents, my in-laws, and my wife. All of whom I have support in one way or another and all of whom would have 99% of their computing needs met by an iPad.

    69. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Tiny screen?
      Not. Smaller than a 15.6" laptop? Sure but bigger or equivalent to most netbooks.

      At that price, it'd better be.

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      They still haven't fixed it, and they're clearly not going to. All the talk in the world about HTML 5 doesn't change the fact that many, many web sites use Flash, or that there's no HTML 5 equivalent of the Flash developer tools. Until either the iPad changes or the web changes, the iPad will be cut off from a big part of the web.

      On screen keyboard in landscape mode does fine for typing pretty long missives

      Having used an iPad myself, I beg to differ. I wouldn't recommend that screen for typing an SMS, much less a blog post.

      It's really not "crippled" or "limited", not in the knee-jerk manner most consider. It's a nice productivity tool,

      It's crippled in the sense that there are many applications you can't get, web sites you can't use, and tasks you can't perform with it, all because Steve has a chip on his shoulder. As for "productivity tool"... well, maybe with a Bluetooth keyboard hooked up. But at that point, you might ask yourself why you're trying to make it into something it doesn't want to be, and whether you might look a bit less silly using a device where the keyboard is attached to the screen.

      and, it's a great device to have in the house or for travels. It does a ton of stuff.

      Heh. You know what's an even greater device to have in the house or for travels, something that does even more stuff? A netbook. Comparable screen, lower price tag, actual keyboard, and uncrippled OS.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    70. Re:After a month of daily use... by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Its sold more than most touch based Tablet PCs. I would say that indicates its a better product than those.

    71. Re:After a month of daily use... by pseudofrog · · Score: 1

      iPad...
      ...because you need more variety?

    72. Re:After a month of daily use... by timepilot · · Score: 1

      Without a (convenient) keyboard? I'm skeptical, but open to discussion.

    73. Re:After a month of daily use... by rufus+t+firefly · · Score: 1

      Not all computers that don't run MacOS or the iPhone operating system run Windows. That's a pretty stupid assumption to make on slashdot, of all places.

      --
      "He may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." - Duck Soup
    74. Re:After a month of daily use... by ani23 · · Score: 1

      what exactly is high tech people?

    75. Re:After a month of daily use... by WitnessForTheOffense · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of the fanbois talking about malware on PCs. If you have malware on your PC, you're an idiot who downloads shady programs from shady websites and doesn't use security software. That's not a flaw in the OS, it's a flaw in the user.

    76. Re:After a month of daily use... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I have never owned a laptop with screen resolution as low as an iPad.

      You've never owned a 1024x768 screen? Until relatively recently, that's all you got in a 12" laptop (let alone a 10" like the iPad)! You either only recently got your first laptop or you've been using 14" (or bigger) behemoths the whole time and therefore aren't even slightly part of the demographic the iPad is targeting anyway.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    77. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's an app for that:
      http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/rotten-tomatoes/id342598232?mt=8

      This is actually one of the things I'm a little bit worried about with the iPad. Rather than use the open, ubiquitous web, some are choosing to put up walls around their content by making it available through an app rather than the browser.

      More likely though, I think sites like Rotten Tomatoes are generally working to get away from Flash and Silverlight. This, I think, is a good thing. There are enough iPad's out there to make moving away from Flash worthwhile, but not enough to make locking up the content in an app a good idea. I'm happy about this.

    78. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that the ipad is worthless in your opinion, which is more relevant than the fact the ipad is doing very well.

      Tickle Me Elmo did very well, too.

      The iPad is selling well because it's a cool, shiny, new toy. Compared to a smartphone or a netbook, it can't compete on features or price; it can only compete on being cooler, shinier, and newer. But sooner or later the novelty will wear off, and people will realize that the reasons they've been rejecting tablet computers for the past 15 years are still valid.

      Likewise, if Apple introduced a video phone or a touchscreen computer that hangs on the wall, I'm sure it'd sell very well for a while. Then the novelty would wear off, and people would remember the reasons why they haven't been buying video phones and vertically mounted touchscreens for the past few decades either.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    79. Re:After a month of daily use... by Pojut · · Score: 1, Troll

      its pretty obvious that you are so filled with hate for the ipad simply because you can't afford it.

      Why of course, that must be it!

      of course you could never admit it but that's because you're a gutter-snipe.

      I don't know about that...I don't really go outside much.

      95% of the criticism that's leveled against apple kit is based on jealously - it's an unspoken but obvious truth.

      Yes, that's it. I'm jealous that people are spending the same amount of money on an iPad that I spent on my laptop, yet they have half the functionality of my purchase. Stupid features and usability. What the hell was I thinking, why wouldn't I want to spend the same amount of money for less functionality? Doy.

    80. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you just don't get it. Apple is going for success to another and you just don't get it.

    81. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      This story is about the plunge in netbook sales. Netbook screens are usually pretty low res.

      I'm not certain what the GP meant, but I know a lot of people have 17" laptops, then set the fonts to a rather large setting. So, it certainly is conceivable that for some, an iPad with small fonts will be readable because it's held close and this could very easy contain a similar amount of text as a larger or higher resolution screen set with large fonts kept farther away.

    82. Re:After a month of daily use... by mikael_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really? You must be new to the computing world, I could give you a long list of laptops I've used that couldn't go above 800x600, 640x480 or even lower resolutions. I've also been using computers long enough to remember why "everyone" hates Microsoft...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    83. Re:After a month of daily use... by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the people going out and getting these either have money to burn or don't realize that you can get a pretty decent and big laptop for the same kind of money.

      The people getting iPads DON'T WANT A BIG LAPTOP! They're getting the iPad specifically because it's NOT BIG. What part of that is so fucking hard to understand?!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    84. Re:After a month of daily use... by raddan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't hear many people complaining about not being able to write novels on their Playstations.

    85. Re:After a month of daily use... by Peteskiplayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has also had a lot more media coverage and been hyped greatly, and it's quite likely the marketing budget was larger too as Apple is touting it as the 'next big thing'.
      This may lead to more sales even if the product isn't any better.

    86. Re:After a month of daily use... by Graff · · Score: 1

      I think the thing that amazes me the most about that video is that even after bashing it against the blender a few times you can clearly see the on-screen keyboard through the cracks in the display.

      The place where he bent the iPad is filled with battery. What's amazing is that he didn't short out the battery and cause it to overheat and go into a meltdown.

      Most of the actual electronics are in the bottom of the unit so you'd have to damage it down there to stop it from actually running. It's still pretty cool that the display continued to work decently, up until it was blended!

    87. Re:After a month of daily use... by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you wear an outrageously silly beanie hat, it will compensate for the lack of tight trousers.

    88. Re:After a month of daily use... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      But I know Macs are not too complex to use and maintain because Steve says they are intuitive. Have Macs suddenly become too complex for Apple customers?

      Macs are every bit as complex as a Windows or Linux machine, it's just that most of the complexity is hidden to the user unless he/she decides to delve deeper. Believe me, if you fire up a terminal window in OS X and start using Unix commands and editing config files in vi, you can get just as lost in a world of complexity as you can using any other platform.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    89. Re:After a month of daily use... by Peach+Rings · · Score: 1

      *Groan*. That "macs vs pcs" dichotomy makes no sense. It's OSX vs Windows vs GNU/Linux vs *BSD etc.

    90. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lots of people by televisions and game consoles. These cost considerably more than $500 and arguably do a lot less. What's your point again?

      $500 is an affordable price for a pretty large segment of the population. Couple that with the fact that there is so much software that you can get either for free or very inexpensively and you end up with a pretty cheap device that does quite a lot.

      Buy a PS3 or an XBox and check out the price of their popular titles. Lots of games are $50 or even more. When I buy a game for my iPad, I consider $5 to be expensive.

    91. Re:After a month of daily use... by mikael_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never heard anyone say that about the Macbook Air (I assume that's the product you meant when you wrote "the Air"), I did hear (and agree with) plenty of people talk about it being overpriced or being too much of an "executive" laptop (meaning it's ultra-light and had enough power to do just about anything most people do in a normal workday but overall what you're getting just isn't worth it since the small edge it has over regular laptops is negated by the high price).

      Also, in case you didn't know, the Macbook Air was a full-fledged laptop where the focus was on making it lightweight and thin, unfortunately the price seemed to be too high for most people (I have met a couple of *nix geeks working as consultants who swore it was the best laptop they'd ever owned but they were an exception since they could afford it and it made sense for them to use a laptop with a decent-sized screen combined with a form factor that's as small as possible).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    92. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also has a very decent ssh client available for it, issh.

      I use it to irc, maintain boxes at work that i vpn into... very big downside is lack of backgrounding. That's going to be remedied in 4.0 so I shouldnt have that complaint.

      As for the keyboard, I can type very nearly 70-80wpm on it (landscape, obviously). Quite fast, and people look at me funny (at work, or at home when friends are over) when im typing on it in because I think they believe all the bullshit that its impossible to type on.

      It's not, its different, it took me some practice... on a physical kb i type around 120wpm (highest is 137) at 100% accuracy. So its slower obviously, but very usable.

      My acer aspire one as been retired to the garage for schematics when i work on my car. This device has taken its place in my living room and I have absolutely no complaints about it other than backgrounding.

    93. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long will it do well? How long until users realize that it doesn't fill any real need and is only a niche device? How long until they get tried of carrying it around just to occasionally check their email? How long until they fall back to using their phones and leaving their iPad at home... unused except for couch surfing?

      Of course it initially sells well, it's an apple fanboy's wetdream. The real test will be when the shiny new wears off and people realize they paid $500+ for an occasional use device...

    94. Re:After a month of daily use... by Paracelcus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As I see it, you pay $500.00 for a pretty, shiny toy with a closed OS designed for a telephone as opposed to a versatile open platform with more everything (RAM, Storage, USB, Etc) for $300.00.

      But, you get to prance around with your expensive toy and hold you're nose high in the air cause you've got an Apple!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    95. Re:After a month of daily use... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      I tried chopping onions, and wound up accidentally downloading porn!

      And, because it's running an Apple-created OS, you didn't end up with any malware! Score one for the iPad!

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    96. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 for which game console???

    97. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'd be surprised how many real geeks use apple devices.

      Some of us have grown out of having to tinker with EVERYTHING, and can tell the difference between my rack in my office at home, and appliance i use in the living room when im not working.

      I hack for a living, when I'm home kicking my feet up on the coffee table watching some tv i dont feel like fucking with shit.

      The ipad just works. It works fast. and as for lack of flash support, html5 is all over the place now. even youtube.com works perfectly in safari on it for me. More sites will follow suit, you'll see.

    98. Re:After a month of daily use... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      About your comment on price, for me, I was looking into a device that can be like a netbook tablet. $499 isn't bad - Lenovo S10-3T and Asus T91MT are about the same range. Of course, they are general purpose computers instead of the restricted iPad. But I've to say iPad user experience is better - snappy, simple and responsive. I cannot wait until netbook/tablet are like that but right now they're no where near it.

    99. Re:After a month of daily use... by darrylo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The iPad is easy-to-use, and has a decent battery life. Flash issues aside, it's the perfect device for non-technical users. Sure, it doesn't do a lot of things well, but it does them "good enough" -- good enough that the non-technical users don't care or can't tell the difference. And many (most?) don't care if there isn't a physical keyboard -- a lot of people can only type via hunt-and-peck, and most of them probably don't care if they're pecking on a real or virtual keyboard.

      Of course the iPad is disliked by a lot of people on slashdot, but advanced users aren't the target audience. Allow me to use a word that many people here might understand: it's for the "n00bs". Many consumers still have only little to modest computer expertise, and the iPad is a great, toaster-like device for them. (Apple will probably make a metric a**load more money selling to novices than advanced users.)

    100. Re:After a month of daily use... by NekSnappa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you are just a normal user, then the average consumer computer (i.e. one that runs OSX or Windows 7) is extremely simple.

      What you say is true. However for the "average user" (read not folks on /.) Install then uninstall a couple of programs on the Windows box, and the registry gets a little cranky. Or on Windows or OS X they read an article that changing this, that, or the other setting will make the machine do "something cool." And then suddenly it does work the same as it did before.

      The system isn't borked or anything. But the machine no longer behaves as it once did so it might as well be completely screwed as far as the user is concerned.

      Give the same group of people a device which does what they need to amuse themselves. With an OS designed for it. With very little flexibility to save them from themselves, and everybody's happy.

      Yes, even you. Because now you don't have to spend a weekend trying to figure out what Aunt Emma did to trash her registry.

      Have we as a culture really become that goddamn stupid? Do we really need our computers to function like digital picture books?

      Some people do just want digital picture books. Some just want to surf the web and stream Pandora. Just because someone doesn't want to use a computer for the same type. or breadth of things that you do doesn't mean they are stupid.

      If fact I'm very sure that there are a lot of people out there who are a lot smarter than you, or me, that just want that digital picture book.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    101. Re:After a month of daily use... by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you get a 10h-long story (sometimes much more) with extremely crisp visuals going at 720p, 5.1 surround sound, ACTUAL buttons and online multiplayer including leaderboards, arranged teams, competitive play with 16+ people and all that?

      I'm alright with people saying the iPad has games, but damn it, I compare iPad games with PSN or XBL games, not full-fledged disc-based stuff!

    102. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Apple,

      Thanks for providing me with a small computing device that is much more superior than a netbook.

      I can do much more with my iPad than any netbook because:

      1) The size of the keyboard and trackpad don't assume that my fingers are as small as a 5-year-old's fingers are. (And if I'm unhappy with the virtual keyboard, I can always use any bluetooth keyboard with it)
      2) The screen is a decent quality IPS panel on which I can actually work and read for more than half an hour without wanting to stab my eyes out with a fork.
      3) The build quality of the device is decent and doesn't show cracks in the plastic after a few months of use. I'm sure that it will also last me at least a year without having some stupid problems like having a broken power connector.
      4) The device has a battery that lasts on average more than 9 hours on normal use. I can shove this in my messenger bag and practically be guaranteed that I'll have battery life for whatever I'll want to do with it during the day.

      Love,
      Anonymous Coward.

    103. Re:After a month of daily use... by jDeepbeep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      Outside of /., it's called 'convenient', not 'crippled.'

      --
      Reply to That ||
    104. Re:After a month of daily use... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I never said it was worthless, I just said I don't think for reasons listed that it was worth over 500 dollars to be used as a web surfing device.

      Also had they put some version of OSX on it I would have jumped on it.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    105. Re:After a month of daily use... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Given that Android uses the same renderer as the iPad, I'd have to call BS on your post.

    106. Re:After a month of daily use... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      What you say is true. However for the "average user" (read not folks on /.) Install then uninstall a couple of programs on the Windows box, and the registry gets a little cranky. Or on Windows or OS X they read an article that changing this, that, or the other setting will make the machine do "something cool." And then suddenly it does work the same as it did before.

      The system isn't borked or anything. But the machine no longer behaves as it once did so it might as well be completely screwed as far as the user is concerned.

      Give the same group of people a device which does what they need to amuse themselves. With an OS designed for it. With very little flexibility to save them from themselves, and everybody's happy.

      Yes, even you. Because now you don't have to spend a weekend trying to figure out what Aunt Emma did to trash her registry.

      Fair enough. I still anxiously look forward to a time when no generation is left alive that grew up without a computer in the home.

      Some people do just want digital picture books. Some just want to surf the web and stream Pandora. Just because someone doesn't want to use a computer for the same type. or breadth of things that you do doesn't mean they are stupid.

      Agreed...but needing it to be the equivalent of Duplo blocks is ridiculous. You have to move up to regular Legos at SOME point.

      If fact I'm very sure that there are a lot of people out there who are a lot smarter than you, or me, that just want that digital picture book.

      Wanting and needing are two very different things.

    107. Re:After a month of daily use... by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      ...someone who... knows you'll only use it for web browsing, iPhone-type games, and e-books.

      Don't you realize that describes the majority of netbook users already?

      Nice use of ellipses there, but I think you just proved my point by doing that.

      Netbooks have keyboards. Whatever other merits the iPad has, it's fairly universally known that the iPad's software keyboard sucks for actual typing. that's why it doesn't make a good netbook replacement. Netbook users want to work on documents on the go, respond to e-mails, and do other things that you need a decent keyboard to do. People who want to play iPhone-type games already have...you know...iPhones. Obviously, the iPad gives you a substantially better Web experience than the iPhone, but netbooks can do things like running Flash, responding to forum posts, etc.

      I'm certainly not saying that the iPad doesn't have a demographic it's good for. I just don't think that your average netbook user is it. Someone who's that casual about their Web browsing can use their smartphone,and anyone who buys the iPad to do any work on the road will be sorely disappointed.

    108. Re:After a month of daily use... by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      9" is far from tiny. I use a 1280x800 8.9" netbook tablet convertible and I can surf just fine. Video is great too.
      While I think the iPad is ridiculous, I don't underestimate the power of mobility. Lightweight, and a much bigger screen than a phone - A joy for people who only surfed mobile-ly with a cell phone.

      Funnily enough, many people ask me if I'm using an iPad and then I proceed to explain mine runs Windows7, multiple apps, flash, DVD drive, USB ports and HD resolution..... Too bad I only get 2:40 hrs on the 3-cell battery tho.

      --
      ^_^
    109. Re:After a month of daily use... by Bryan3000000 · · Score: 1

      That and an ssh client is all I need, so yes, I do believe I want one.

    110. Re:After a month of daily use... by Nemyst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I get an iPad, I want it to be portable. Getting a Bluetooth keyboard on top of that defeats that purpose, since suddenly you're carrying around two things (at which point a netbook becomes a better investment).

      Compared to a netbook, it is crippled. I want to be able to install whatever I want, whenever I want, from whoever I want without Jobs policing me. If I want Flash, well I'm stuck on the iPad (like it or not, Flash is still very widespread and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future; yes it's still brought up and all the fanbois crying that Flash is so 2000s are obviously disconnected from reality). If I want to do anything serious, I won't use an onscreen keyboard. Do you touch type? I do, and I can tell you it's quite a bit more effective than going one-finger on a touchscreen. Even if you became used to it, you can never expect to be as fast as you would on a normal keyboard.

      Honestly, the number one reason it sells to well is that it is very simple to use and that Apple's sales and marketing teams are amongst the best in the industry. That's it.

    111. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Given that Android uses the same renderer as the iPad, I'd have to call BS on your post.

      Sorry, but it's the truth. I verified myself that the site (1) does not work on the iPad and (2) does work on the Droid.

      Both browsers are based on WebKit, but with customized code, and different JavaScript engines.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    112. Re:After a month of daily use... by Ltap · · Score: 1

      And what would you do in your VNC session? Most of the people who use VNC use it to control servers, so without a (real) keyboard, this would be a Herculean task.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    113. Re:After a month of daily use... by Ltap · · Score: 0

      Which is a role that small netbooks already fill. It's an issue of capabilities. Both the iPad and smaller netbooks can do the same stuff roughly as well as each other, but netbooks have more capabilities.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    114. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      TV + game console > $500

    115. Re:After a month of daily use... by Ltap · · Score: 1

      ... you can get just as lost ...

      What, no man pages?

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    116. Re:After a month of daily use... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1, Troll

      I assure you that most people are not as stupid as you (think they are). I bought my iPad because it's NOT a big laptop. Why the fuck would I want one of those?

      The iPad does about 90% of what I use a computer for outside of work. And I can bring it anywhere and use it fully in most places I go (i.e. AT&T has coverage). Why would I NOT want one?

    117. Re:After a month of daily use... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      You're correct. I don't get it furthermore I won't get it and unless you're a stock holder in apple I don't see why it should bother you that I don't get it.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    118. Re:After a month of daily use... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree, it's just a radically different philosophy... Bored childhood leads to inventive personalities and self-intuition. But, sometimes it's nice to play a game too...

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    119. Re:After a month of daily use... by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      Yeah well, but it's also too big to fit a your pocket. What do you have to say about that mister smarty pants?

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    120. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Netbooks have keyboards. Whatever other merits the iPad has, it's fairly universally known that the iPad's software keyboard sucks for actual typing. that's why it doesn't make a good netbook replacement. Netbook users want to work on documents on the go, respond to e-mails, and do other things that you need a decent keyboard to do. People who want to play iPhone-type games already have...you know...iPhones. Obviously, the iPad gives you a substantially better Web experience than the iPhone, but netbooks can do things like running Flash, responding to forum posts, etc.

      Unfortunately, the netbook's hardware keyboard ALSO sucks for actual typing. I find the iPad easier to type on than my netbook! Heck, my iPhone isn't that much worse than the netbook's keyboard.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    121. Re:After a month of daily use... by Ltap · · Score: 1

      This is the main argument everyone uses. What if I sold shit, and created a marketing campaign? And if people bought the feces, would it then be a good product? From a design standpoint, most Apple products are quite poor - far too expensive than what they are worth, annoying to use, and they have far less capabilities than their competitors. Just because people want it, doesn't mean it's not crap.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    122. Re:After a month of daily use... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The reason that some pages have to reload is because the iPad (like the -phone and -pod Touch) are memory limited and do not swap. Annoying it may be, but the alternative is to just crash.

    123. Re:After a month of daily use... by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      iPhone OS is "some version" of OS X.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    124. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I call this the slashdot cycle.

      1) Criticize a new device/technology because it isn't open/free enough for your personal tastes, and talk about how NO ONE WILL BUY THIS CUZ IT AIN'T FREE, AND CUSTOMERS VALUE FREEDOM!
      2) Watch as people enjoy and buy/use the new device/technology
      3) Complain about how WELL IT ISN'T USEFUL AS THIS OTHER THING THAT IS VERY DIFFERENT WHY DON'T YOU USE THAT? YOU'RE STUPID BECAUSE I'M A GENIUS.
      4) Complain more and shoot down anyone who tries to explain the appeal, they're clearly a plant by corporations!
      5) Repeat with next technology that comes along

      There's not even a profit stage!

    125. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used a netbook for the last 14 months - openSuse 11.1 w/ kde3.5 for 12months and slackware 13.0 w/ kde3.5 the last 2 w/o issue. I would never own an apple product.

    126. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      IMO, comparing an iPhone to an iPad is like comparing that tiny netbook with a tiny screen and puny keyboard to a desktop.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    127. Re:After a month of daily use... by Evtim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the large sale figures are because they are trying (and perhaps succeeding) to engage the completely non-technical crowd that still has to/would like to use at least the Web in their lives.

      Like my mom who has first seen PC at the age of 45 and never needed it, but now would want to Skype with me, being 2000km away. And no one around her can support (without payment) a PC. Add to that girlfriends/wives (some of them), posers, fan boys, uber consumers....I am damn sure the hype will not die out in a hurry.

      I would still not buy it for my mom because it will be some time (if ever) until the OS is translated into my language (mom does not speak English). I hope they do it for Russian though - that will solve it for her.

      I offered my wife to consider the iPad, but she disagrees with Apple about the pr0n thing and Steve's high moral horse (she reads /. sometimes).

      I would love to be able to browse while in the sofa though, so I hope there will be many more and suited to every taste devices like this. And I hope the whole DRM thing will not spoil the book reading, music listening and movie watching experiences on said devices.

    128. Re:After a month of daily use... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Universally known eh?

      Every review of the iPad I have seen was written on the iPad and every reviewer I have read has said that, while not quite as good as a physical keyboard it is quite sufficient for something like writing an article for a magazine or blog. If that's not good enough for sending emails or posting on facebook or slashdot then you aren't doing it right.

      I have only had the chance to play with an iPad for a short time. I didn't get to uses the keyboard a ton but I didn't have any trouble with it and I don't believe I would have any trouble typing up an email, or this post right here, on that keyboard.

      Many netbooks have rather crappy keyborad's as well that I certainly wouldn't want to use for typing a novel, but you don't see me claiming they are universally bad.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    129. Re:After a month of daily use... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      ... you can get just as lost ...

      What, no man pages?

      Of course there are. Hence, my comment about getting lost... ;-)

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    130. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. You know what's an even greater device to have in the house or for travels, something that does even more stuff? A netbook. Comparable screen, lower price tag, actual keyboard, and uncrippled OS.

      Yeah, sure. Try playing an HD movie on your low-powered netbook. Or try those cute 3D games that are all the rage. How many can you find that are actually playable?

      Go ahead, try it and let me know how it goes.

    131. Re:After a month of daily use... by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      Wanting and needing are two very different things.

      This is true. It is also true that people don't just buy what they need. I don't believe anyone who says they cannot live without an Apple product. They can, they'd have to "settle" for Windows or Linux or something (or, gasp!, no computer at all!), but they could.

      That being said, I do own more than my fair share of Apple products, I think, because I like the design of Mac OS X, and believe it is superior to Windows. I like that I don't have to install CygWin in order to have a shell that functions like the shell on the servers at work. Also, my iPod and iPhone sync very well with it, and share my purchased content. Apple may be getting a cut of every purchase I make off iTunes, but the original artist behind that song, show, movie, or application still gets something. Can the same be said if you just bittorrent it, jailbreak it, or copy a friend's copy of a copy?

    132. Re:After a month of daily use... by krelian · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that before the ipad/flash debacle any mention of flash on /. would attract comments like "flash is ruining the web" "flash is evil" etc...

      Now on the other hand, it's being regarded as of equal importance to our web surfing activity as having a decent browser.

    133. Re:After a month of daily use... by mac84 · · Score: 1

      The average slashdotter just can't get it. This is not for you, the technogeek power user. This is for the 80% of the population of the developed world that does not have the inclination to install arbitrary OS's or OS patches, concern himself with viruses or continual signature file updates. This is a relatively bulletproof appliance they can hand to their kids and not fear the software configuration being irrevocably scrambled. This is something grandma can use with impunity and not concern herself (or you since she won't be calling you so often to fix her netbook) over continual maintenance of the software. To many neophytes, closed and limited is good.

    134. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't having to download applications to get the iPad to perform the same fundamental tasks as a standard web browser kind of fly in the face of people's assumption that the iPad is favored because of it's simplicity? I kinda think so.

    135. Re:After a month of daily use... by natehoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a notebook user who knows several other notebook users, and is also a tablet (iPod Touch) user who knows other tablet users, not just "no" but "hell no". The devices may seem identical on the surface, but they are fundamentally different tools for fundamentally different uses.

      Don't get me wrong, I own an iPod Touch (won it in a contest) and I love the thing for what it does, and there have been many occasions where I've thought, "you know, something like this with about a 10 inch screen would be utterly brilliant!". So I understand the demographic and applications of the iPad fairly well.

      But when it came to a portable device, I chose a netbook. I use it for a lot more than iPhone-type games, web browsing, and e-books. Well, OK, most of my stuff technically qualifies as "web browsing" but a lot of it involves typing (case in point, what I'm doing right now). The difference between a tablet and a netbook is in the ability to interact. I can have a video conference on my netbook. I can type whole paragraphs on it. I can't sit comfortably on the couch and watch a movie on it, nor can I do a crossword puzzle easily on it. Reading books on it is frustrating - especially while sitting up in bed - it's too heavy and the damn keyboard gets in the way.

      I see the iPad as cutting into the Netbook demographic because Apple is the first to introduce a somewhat affordable and (within strict limits) very functional tablet that doesn't completely suck, and many of the tablet demographic have been going to Netbooks because they are close enough, not because they are what they actually want. Now that there's a completely-non-sucking tablet out there, the tablet-desiring demographic is discovering that they need not be encumbered by a keyboard and a form factor that doesn't quite suit them, and they can buy precisely what they do want. They just have to put up with the compromises of a closed ecosystem, but that isn't as much of a downside for a tablet as it is for a netbook anyway - you use a tablet more for passive consumption, not so much for interaction.

      So, netbook sales are not being "destroyed". They will drop, though. The demand is adjusting to account for the simple fact that not everyone who bought a netbook last year really wanted a netbook. Some of them really wanted a tablet, but they settled for a netbook because it was the closest thing that they could find. Now that the tablet niche has been competently filled with an affordable device, the netbook niche will see a loss of some of these crossover sales.

      Doesn't mean the market for netbooks is going away. It just means that there's a giant pent-up demand for non-sucking tablets, so Apple moved a lot of units based on that pent-up demand. Netbooks will still sell to people who want netbooks, but they won't sell to people who want tablets any more.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    136. Re:After a month of daily use... by Altus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone I know who owns an iPad is an engineer. Several of them write code for a living, all of them are very computer literate.

      Now I'm not saying that the iPad isn't good for non technical people, but your assumption about advanced users is incorrect. Admittedly they aren't replacing their primary computer with an iPad but they are using them far more than their primary machines for casual use cases. Just because someone is capable of being a power user does not mean that they wont enjoy sitting back on their couch and using an iPad.

      There might even come a day when I will stop buying laptops and actually move back to a desktop for my heavy duty computer and own an iPad for all my portable computing needs.

      I know a lot of people talk about an iPad being useless for "real" work. I don't know about you but most of the real work that most people do is at an office on a computer provided by the company that employs them. That might not be the case for you, but it is the case for the majority of the world (even the majority of technical professionals).

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    137. Re:After a month of daily use... by andreasg · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that a laptop, this includes netbooks, are crap to use any place other than by a desk. I'd rather kill myself than try to browse on a netbook while sitting in a sofa. Same goes for cramped spaces such as plane or train trips.

    138. Re:After a month of daily use... by NekSnappa · · Score: 1
      First of all, thanks for not taking a flamethrower to me for my reply. I don't often make posts like that because I don't like getting vitriol in response to trying to have a dialog.

      Fair enough. I still anxiously look forward to a time when no generation is left alive that grew up without a computer in the home.

      That won't make too a big difference. I'm 46 and didn't grow up with a computer in the house. Unless you want to count the Pong machine (No really that's all it did was play Pong). And I'm very much a technophile, and do mechanical design. My son is 21 and there was always computers around as he grew up. Yet he has no interest in the complexities of computers, only the application of them.

      He can sit down in front of Garage Band on his Mac at home, or whatever software they use at the studio where he works and create incredible music, and audio effects. But if something goes wrong, he's done working until somebody else fixes it. He doesn't know how to fix the problem, and doesn't want to know. The computer is a tool for him to do what he wants to do. A means to an end, not an end to itself.

      Agreed...but needing it to be the equivalent of Duplo blocks is ridiculous. You have to move up to regular Legos at SOME point.

      The counter to what I said about my son is this. A simple device like an iPad could be the gateway drug for some people, young and old alike. Not every junkie starts out on heroin.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    139. Re:After a month of daily use... by feepness · · Score: 3, Informative

      The actual worth of an iPad aside, your friend has a new piece of tech which people are lining up to buy at full retail and is still in limited supply? And he is letting it sit idle? He is either imaginary or an idiot or has never heard of eBay.

      He's a app developer. He bought it to make his stuff work on it.

      According to him, it's just too heavy to be comfortable and he always grabs his iPhone instead.

    140. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You say they "haven't fixed it" with respect to no flash support. Eh? It is working! Woohoo! No flash! Bring out the champagne! This may come as a huge shock to you, but some people don't *like* flash and *aren't* geeks. This whole "flash == the Internet" meme seemed to pop up after the iPad announcement (it didn't seem that big an issue with the iTouch and iPhone) in a way that totally smacks of astroturfing by Adobe. I'm *not* saying *you* are astroturfing, but it does seem odd that only now are people outraged by Apple's intransigence on the issue. Its like being horrified about MS dropping ActiveX. The only thing I would do is cheer.

    141. Re:After a month of daily use... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Oh, well... if we have your assurance then it must be true.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    142. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not doing well. If you actually read, or looked into it, APPLE SHIPPED 1 MILLION. Not sold.
      The report is flat wrong, but thats something to expect from slashdot not actually researching and copy and paste "news".

    143. Re:After a month of daily use... by krelian · · Score: 1

      That's what i am wondering. Tablet PC's are not new, what makes the ipad so superior to what has been on offer until now?

    144. Re:After a month of daily use... by Zawahiri · · Score: 0

      > We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      We'll keep talking about it as long as it still matters. Maybe it doesn't matter to you, but it still matters.

    145. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure. Try playing an HD movie on your low-powered netbook.

      All right.

      The ATI Radeon HD 3200 graphics on board the Eee PC 1201T is easily capable of playing back smooth 720p and 1080p HD video in a few formats. CPU usage for both 720p and 1080p seemed to average at 50% CPU usage with dips as low as 30% and spikes as high as 70%.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    146. Re:After a month of daily use... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Good news! It does have some version of OS X on it. You should go pick one up.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    147. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that a laptop, this includes netbooks, are crap to use any place other than by a desk.

      Tablets are crap to use anywhere. That's not an improvement.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    148. Re:After a month of daily use... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I'll start off by saying I have no plans on getting one. I don't see it being worth it, and would rather dump the money on a netbook or mid-range laptop.

      Plus, I have an iPhone which does about 90% of what an iPad can do but with a smaller screen. If I didn't have an iPhone I *might* consider the iPad but I'm not sure. When I'm home in 1-2 rooms away from my PC I'll sometimes just do some light browsing on my iPhone if it's simple stuff like news/weather/wikipedia/etc.

      That being said I can see the benefit, it is *something* like an e-Book read on steroids. Granted I prefer to read on ePaper over an LED (and real paper over ePaper), I can see the appeal there.

      Browse the internet, read news, read Marvel comics, etc. All on a decent rez color screen. Leave it lying on the coffee table, put it wherever, it looks less obtrusive than leaving a Netbook lying around.

      Again, I don't want one and don't see myself ever getting one. But it has *some* appeal that might matter to some people.

    149. Re:After a month of daily use... by andreasg · · Score: 1

      Oh no! But the TV got no keyboard! The TV doesn't do flash! It must be useless!?

    150. Re:After a month of daily use... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      First of all, thanks for not taking a flamethrower to me for my reply. I don't often make posts like that because I don't like getting vitriol in response to trying to have a dialog.

      Can't get anywhere with a flamewar :-)

      That won't make too a big difference. I'm 46 and didn't grow up with a computer in the house. Unless you want to count the Pong machine (No really that's all it did was play Pong). And I'm very much a technophile, and do mechanical design. My son is 21 and there was always computers around as he grew up. Yet he has no interest in the complexities of computers, only the application of them.

      I'm 26, which, in my opinion, is the perfect age. I'm old enough to remember renting VHS tapes, seeing orange and green displays, being amazed at early "briefcase phones", and knowing a time before the consumer Internet. I'm also young enough to be able to take full advantage of it and have seen the Internet enter the public conciousness just as I was becomming an age old enough to figure it out easily...old enough to understand, young enough to learn it quickly.

      People like your son baffle me. You can't expect to get the most out of something if you don't know how it works. This applies to cars, computers, music...you name it.

      The counter to what I said about my son is this. A simple device like an iPad could be the gateway drug for some people, young and old alike. Not every junkie starts out on heroin.

      I agree...it shouldn't be that way, but ::shrug:: what'r you gonna do?

    151. Re:After a month of daily use... by glenn.ramsey · · Score: 0

      TV = $150
      Wii = $200
      TV + Wii = $350 < $500 Try again.

    152. Re:After a month of daily use... by Amouth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the air would have been nice.. if it had a REAL docking station.. and was changed so that it didn't have a drop down xicom style wired network connector..

      oh and a couple extra usb ports and an option for a cheaper rotating drive.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    153. Re:After a month of daily use... by Altus · · Score: 1

      You know, for most of the world, when its time to do "work" we get in our cars, or walk to public transportation and go to these things call "jobs" and at these jobs, our "employers" (as we call them) generally provide us with the equipment necessary to do this "work."

      Now certainly, not everyone in the world follows this model, but it is the prevailing model for the much of the first world.

      When I am not at my job I don't actually do much of what you would apparently call "work." I might renovate my house or fix up my motorcycle or something like that, but it turns out that when I do those things, my choice of computing devices doesn't really factor into it.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    154. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      it didn't seem that big an issue with the iTouch and iPhone [...] it does seem odd that only now are people outraged by Apple's intransigence on the issue.

      That's because no one expected a full browsing experience on a hand-held device like the iPhone. The standard of comparison was other smartphones, and that's a comparison that the iPhone could easily win at the time.

      But a $500-$900 device with a netbook-sized screen, and too much weight and bulk to use like a smartphone, is naturally going to be compared to netbooks, where Flash has widespread support. People will expect the web to "just work" on an iPad the way it does on other devices of similar size and price.

      In addition, Flash is now due to arrive on other smartphones before the end of the year, so people are starting to take another look at its absence on the iPhone. If Adobe can deliver a well-performing, stable plugin for Android, Apple will have a hard time continuing with the story that they're blocking it for technical reasons.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    155. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      How do you feel browsing with ad-blocker and noscript?

    156. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Really? A bad product doesn't sell a million in a month. A product that is doomed to fail from launch doesn't sell a million in a month. Get the fuck over it you were all wrong, once again, about an Apple product.

    157. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I don't have pride in the iPad I don't even own one. Maybe I will someday but frankly it's out of my price range. I'm just sick of reading Slashdot only to come across people bitching and moaning about what is popular (because popular things can never succeed right? thats how Slashdotters made themselves feel better in high school). This is just fun because now I get to watch it all fall down on the Apple haters who are even more fucking dumb than the Apple fanboys.

    158. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, regardless of the merits of the iPad or lack thereof, that's a dumbshit opinion.

    159. Re:After a month of daily use... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Well, I hope you have an additional computer - you know to back up your iPad using iTunes, and for a host of other things that the iPad can't do itself, directly.

      The iPad is not a laptop replacent, it's a satellite device (like the ipod/iphone/mp3 players, etc) that require a proper computer to function.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    160. Re:After a month of daily use... by darrylo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear enough: while, IMHO, the main target audience is regular (non-technical) consumers, I didn't mean to imply that this was the only audience, or that technical users did not buy it. It's just that the non-technical marketplace is larger, and Apple would be crazy to not target the larger audience.

      It's just that so many technical people here seem to think that, because the iPad isn't useful for them, the iPad can't possibly be a success.

    161. Re:After a month of daily use... by nigelo · · Score: 1

      If you wear an outrageously silly beanie hat, it will compensate for the lack of tight trousers.

      Message Of The Day.

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    162. Re:After a month of daily use... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      I've had good luck with Jaadu VNC (now called iTeleport). Some of the other iPhone clients haven't been revised to work with the full display size, but iTeleport does, as of a few days ago.

    163. Re:After a month of daily use... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      but as of now, buying apple kit indicates that you don't care about openness, freedom and everything that is good about computing. it is a device to mindlessly and expensively consume big media. revolting, just like the people who buy it.

      Do you also stand outside Best Buy, haranguing anyone who walks out with a new TV? If not, you're being inconsistent.

    164. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      That's not true. Who defines it as crap? You? Well than you aren't a customer. If their demographic and customer base thought it was crap, that would mean something. When you say it's crap it's nothing more than a cheap insult.

    165. Re:After a month of daily use... by Altus · · Score: 1

      It's a good, if expensive, compromise between power and portability. I have one and I more often use it for surfing the web than for compiling code or editing video, that doesn't mean it was a total waste of money.

      On the other hand, I might be better served in the future building a high quality desktop for $600 which would be more powerful than my macbook and buying an iPad, which would be more portable than my macbook. The total cost would be less than what I spent on my 15" macbook pro.

      Maybe there is a point to this whole iPad thing. Its very rare that I want to compile code or edit video while also on the road. Some people might have those needs, but I don't and I bet most people don't.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    166. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      netbooks aren't big and are cheaper....

      They are getting them because they have money to burn and this is simply and entertainment device. Its like the adult version of a gameboy.

      People really can't be buying this to replace laptops or computers in general. These stupid things just can't do everything that normal computers can.

      If I had money to blow and liked apple, I would probably do the same, but since I don't I may just go out and get a netbook. I have a desktop already with a quadcore at 3.3ghz and a laptop with a dual core at 2.2x. I would simply be getting a netbook for entertainment purposes because Its batter life is great and it can do simple retarded things.

    167. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still haven't fixed it, and they're clearly not going to...

      By "They" you must mean Adobe? Clearly, it's up to Adobe to fix all of the problems with Flash - which is why the technology got Steve'd from iPad/Pod/Phone.

    168. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      By "They" you must mean Adobe? Clearly, it's up to Adobe to fix all of the problems with Flash - which is why the technology got Steve'd from iPad/Pod/Phone.

      That's what Steve would like you to think. When Flash for Android is released later this year, we'll see just how truthful Steve is. (My money's on "pants on fire".)

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    169. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      Your posts in this discussion have been numerous and overwhelmingly pro-Apple, so I'm not too sure about some of things you're saying here.

      How about instead of flagrantly insulting people we discuss what's good and bad about the damned thing? Instead of calling people fucktards for saying, "It's an underspecced device," or "I'd gladly pay a THOUSAND dollars for a competent notepad viewer!" we make it a little less obvious which side of the fence we're on. It's basically just creating a bias against our user name's when we post in the future.

    170. Re:After a month of daily use... by nigelo · · Score: 1

      Yeah well, but it's also too big to fit a your pocket. What do you have to say about that mister smarty pants?

      Maybe the pockets are bigger (certainly deeper?) in those smarty pants?

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    171. Re:After a month of daily use... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Heh. You know what's an even greater device to have in the house or for travels, something that does even more stuff? A netbook. Comparable screen, lower price tag, actual keyboard, and uncrippled OS.

      An added attraction for the netbook is that it can support a botnet.

      Seriously, I know a whole lot of people who we all would be better off if they surfed the Web with an iPad and not a real computer.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    172. Re:After a month of daily use... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet"

      Why on Earth would you need a keyboard to browse the Internet? Maybe you want to type a quick message like this one? That's not browsing, but a virtual keyboard is fine for that.

      Why would you not want to use a full size notebook? It's hot, heavy, hard to use in many relaxed positions, short battery life....

    173. Re:After a month of daily use... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If your jeans are loose enough they won't let you into an Apple store you might want to watch out for cops and indecent exposure charges.

    174. Re:After a month of daily use... by abigor · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I guess you are new to computers.

    175. Re:After a month of daily use... by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Its not trying to be a laptop without a keyboard.

    176. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      and yet, somehow, 1 million people and counting disagree with you... Could it be, perhaps, that you are not the target market!?

      I'm not either, and my mother (professor), father (comp programmer, on /., probably lurking on this thread somewhere), and little sister (she's starting college in the fall, 'nuff said) all need full laptops. For my girlfriend's mother on the hand (who doesnt do more than look at FB and youtube and answer a few emails every so often), or my grandmother (same as g/fs mother)... the iPad is pretty much perfect. It's an appliance that has just enough ability to be turned into something else to keep the "geek toy" crowd happy too, that's what you're missing.

      It's like arguing that my freezer (no, you dont get a car analogy!) at home doesnt work like a commercial, programmable, walk-in unit. It's inferior to the business version, sure, but it eats less power and I dont *need* a zoned, programmable, walk in freezer!

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    177. Re:After a month of daily use... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      The Nokia 5800 sells for about $250 unlocked, no need for a data plan even on AT&T, and qualifies for the $15/month data plan if you really want one. We just upgraded my wife's Blackberry to one (because we never got a data plan for it, and without a data plan the Blackberry is just a really nice cell phone).

      The 5800's got a 3mpix camera, plus a second low-res camera on front for video conferencing, WiFi (that your carrier cannot disable!), replaceable battery, real multitasking, upgradeable memory, etc. The resistive screen even means you can use a stylus (and one is built in), which is a godsend for fat-fingered people like me. Even includes free voice prompted turn-by-turn directions (with offline maps so you don't need a data plan to use it as a GPS). Symbian runs a lot of free and low-cost apps too, and they don't have to go through the Reality Distortion Field for you to run them.

      Honestly, after using resistive and capacitive screens, I prefer resistive. The Nokia's on-screen keyboard is a lot smaller, but I can actually type on it even without the stylus, and with the stylus I do pretty well. With my iPod Touch, if the app can't rotate 90 degrees (which many still cannot) I usually just give up on anything longer than about 10 characters, because I'm just going to screw it up.

      The screen is a tad smaller than the iPhone, and it's a good bit thicker, so it honestly does lack some of the "cool shiny" factor of the iPhone/iPodTouch, but my wife just got one and she's very happy with it. She has a fully-functional smartphone without a data plan.

      As God Is My Witness, I Will Never Buy A Locked Phone Again!

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    178. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      uh, "or my grandmother (same as g/fs mother)" should read "same computing needs as g/f's mother"...

      ::headdesk::, reminder to self, never type a /. post while working on math models, you get too distracted

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    179. Re:After a month of daily use... by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      No Flash support?

      You say that like its a bad thing.

      Some of us want to see that annoying garbage die!

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    180. Re:After a month of daily use... by frist · · Score: 1

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.

      Hahahahaha lol hahah omg lulz waaaaah lol hahahaha. Puh-leaze. Everyone who's every wanted to sit on their comfy chair on their deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other please post.

    181. Re:After a month of daily use... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I think you may have tried the wrong netbook.

      I have an Acer Timeline - 11.6" screen, decent keyboard, 3lbs (easily portable, though not iPad light). It is great for surfing, email, reading (I don't play games, though it seems spec'd to do so). It's hard drive carries all my music, all of my personal files and photos, and all of my work files (combined, about 350GB) which automatically sync to their respective networks seamlessly. It last 8 hours on a charge if I'm not actively working (transcoding, light CAD or PDF marking). It runs my word processor of choice, and spreadsheet, and all the technical apps (structural design and analysis) I use at work and in the field. It tethers to my mobile phone for internet access and has internal wireless elsewhere. I can hook it to my projector through the HDMI port for presentations, or movies.

      It was $300, I added another $100 for a second battery (the 8 hr cap one, plus I have 6hr it came with) and bluetooth. I suspect if I were careful I might get closer to the 10hrs iPad users are getting - I certainly can with the WiFi off (but that kind of defeats the purpose of a browser device).

      There are times I think a slate might be a little more useful - such as using it as an eReader - but I don't use it for that too much.

      I think the real reason netbooks have crashed is that the prices are going UP. To get my machine today would cost me $100 more than it did in the fall of '09. I can get a 15" laptop with similar specs (save battery life, but with a faster proc) for less than this costs now. In my mind, i got my portable office machine, with 80-90% of the iPad advantages, and I don't have to carry around a second "consumer" device.

      The advantage I see to the book

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    182. Re:After a month of daily use... by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Universally known eh?

      Every review of the iPad I have seen was written on the iPad and every reviewer I have read has said that, while not quite as good as a physical keyboard it is quite sufficient for something like writing an article for a magazine or blog. If that's not good enough for sending emails or posting on facebook or slashdot then you aren't doing it right.

      David Pogue's Review

      CNET's iPad Review

      UberGizmo iPad Review

      Mossberg had positive things to say about the iPad's keyboard (no surprise there), and Engadget didn't slam it, but they only really talked about "banging out e-mails" on it.

      About the only thing the iPad's keyboard has going for it is that it's larger than some netbook keyboards. But you have to balance that against the fact that it's not tactile, so there's no touch typing.

      I suppose that if you're used to typing on an iPhone, you'd love the iPad. But for those who need to do any type of document production -- other than short e-mails -- it's not going to work as a netbook replacement.

    183. Re:After a month of daily use... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I'm reading through a page, if I come across a link that interests me, I open it in a new tab in the background. Then I continue on reading the page until there's nothing else I want, and I close the tab. That automatically brings me to the next tab, from which I do the same thing. It's a very easy and natural way of processing things, and I barely understand the point of having multiple web pages open at the same time if you're not managing things that way.

      Do yourself a favor and buy Atomic Web browser for iPad. It's only $0.99 and it does all of the things you want to do. Tap and hold on a link and choose "open in a background tab". Supports ad-block, private browsing (porn mode), full screen browsing, user agent switching, etc.

      The number one feature I like is that I can switch tabs without having to reload the entire page. In Safari, for some reason when you switch pages to a page you loaded even a few minutes ago, it has to reload. This is probably for memory reasons, but it makes tabbed browsing damn inconvenient. Atomic Web does this and somehow keeps the pages in memory.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    184. Re:After a month of daily use... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen anyone mention scrolling yet, so I'll chime in. Scrolling on an iPad is quick, easy, and intuitive in ways I could never imagine when using a touchpad (or even a mouse.) It's difficult to describe why it feels so right--I think it has something to do with being both more precise and more natural. If you've played with a Surface and moved photos and documents around, it's a very similar feeling.

      I make do with a regular mouse on my machines. I try to avoid using the touchpad on my netbook because it's small, cramped, and finicky. There are probably better touchpads on other netbooks, but I think they all suffer from the size issue.

      Tapping is even marginally better than clicking, since to click you have to move the mouse pointer to the right place and then press the button. On a small touchpad, this can get irritating, lead to misclicks, etc.

    185. Re:After a month of daily use... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Its sold more than most touch based Tablet PCs. I would say that indicates its a better product than those.

      Whenever someone says this, I feel obligated to point out that Windows sells better than every other desktop OS combined. Does that indicate that Windows is a better product than Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Linux, OS X, etc?

    186. Re:After a month of daily use... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Resolution needs to be appropriate for screen size. Pixel density is what counts for clarity. 1024x768 is a pretty much optimal 10-inch screen resolution. More pixels would simply sharpen the image beyond the human eye's ability to perceive the difference, and drive the costs way up.

      Even my much-beloved Asus eeePC netbook "only" has 1024x600 pixels, and I've never thought, "gee, if they could just have made the screen clearer by cramming more pixels into this 10.1-inch LCD". In order to see an individual pixel, I'd pretty much need a magnifying glass as it is. And the iPad's screen has even higher resolution than my eeePC.

      I have occasionally thought that I'd like a larger screen, and at that point I'd need a higher resolution, and I wouldn't have a netbook any more - I'd have a laptop. But for ten inches diagonal, the resolution is well-chosen.

      Plus, 1024x768 is still more than 4:3 720p resolution and damned close to 16:9 720p! Think about that next time you watch a 720p video on a 40" screen - the lowly iPad and eeePC have almost the same screen resolution - you just have to hold them closer to see them clearly. (I'll let someone else do the oblig XKCD on this one).

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    187. Re:After a month of daily use... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I know, it's spooky. It's almost as if a large number of people with many and varied opinions were posting.

    188. Re:After a month of daily use... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      The capabilities aren't an issue at all - it's just fine for movies, games, music and web surfing. It doesn't have hinges, no keyboard to break, and it's dead simple.

      It's a consumer gadget, not a PC. I bought a netbook for my daughter and threw on perl and a C compiler... but that's probably not typical.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    189. Re:After a month of daily use... by Sancho · · Score: 1
    190. Re:After a month of daily use... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      They still haven't fixed it, and they're clearly not going to. All the talk in the world about HTML 5 doesn't change the fact that many, many web sites use Flash, or that there's no HTML 5 equivalent of the Flash developer tools. Until either the iPad changes or the web changes, the iPad will be cut off from a big part of the web.

      Trouble is that I have an iPhone and do lots of browsing on it already. So far, I've found no regular site I go to that uses Flash, at least not any that I don't already use an iPhone app for. If I find one that does, it's usually some funny link somebody sent me that isn't worth the effort to worry about. The only sites I use regularly that have Java are work related and usually tied to IE only use anyway. In short, I've already been using the same thing to look at webpages for three years it hasn't been an issue. The one thing I have noticed over the years is my constant thinking while browsing on an iPhone of "Gee, I'd love a larger one of these."

    191. Re:After a month of daily use... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      Which is HILARIOUS coming from /. crowd.

      Think about it for a minute. There is a huge contingent of diehard Flash haters here on /. and then you have this post, which decries the lack of Flash on the iPad.

      So, which is it? We hate flash, until it is not there, then we hate Apple for removing such a pig ?

      Silliness.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    192. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's the problem. I understand the cool factor, but even a netbook is so much more functional than an iPad that I can't really see the justification of going with an iPad over a netbook, unless you're someone who absolutely, positively despises keyboards and knows you'll only use it for web browsing, iPhone-type games, and e-books. It's unbelievable to me that the iPad could overwhelm netbook sales with that kind of demographic.

      "That kind of demographic"?

      With the iPad you can read and write email, browse web, watch photos, and play music and videos and games.

      That covers the home computer needs of about 85% of the population. Get a BT keyboard, and you cover 95%. Sounds like a pretty good demographic to me.

    193. Re:After a month of daily use... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop?

      The laptop limits you more than the iPad does. Web browsing on a laptop is still fundamentally stationary. With the iPad, you don't give a second thought about just carrying it with you wherever you want.

      Tiny screen

      The screen is huge, being coupled with very smooth zooming and scrolling.

      no Flash support

      Hahaha...

      no keyboard

      Bullshit.

      when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      It didn't. The idea that the iPad is crippled is absurd.

      The fact that "I prefer web browsing on my iPad over my notebook" is a such a common sentiment makes a strong case that your inability to grasp that is not due to people just trying to be "hip by using crippled devices". It suggest a fundamental flaw in your assessment of the entire situation.

    194. Re:After a month of daily use... by fruitbane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they key is that most people buying netbooks don't want netbooks. They want something that's fancier than a smart phone but they don't really want another whole computer, and the netbook is simply the closest thing they can fine. These buyers likely DO want a computing appliance rather than a computer. My astonishment is with their willingness to accept the price tag, not the product itself.

    195. Re:After a month of daily use... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The Macintosh still blows away any argument about "complexity".

      Either you have to contradict all of your past propaganda about how robust Macs are, or you have to admit that the iPad is not nearly as "suitable" as you want to make it out to be.

      You pick on Firefox extensions yet they are something that can be downloaded from a central website and then they manage themselves.

      The idea that software breaks is not limited to PCs.

      Apple does no real QA on apps. The fact that apps are generally trivial things is probably the only thing going for them.

      The fact that Windows is a mess is irrelevant since we're talking about Apple here and why they went out of their way to have a platform that is crippled and fascist.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    196. Re:After a month of daily use... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      They still haven't fixed it, and they're clearly not going to

      I find this so funny. I remember very clearly about 10 years ago (or so)when all the "enhancing" navigation plugins started to appear (cortona vrml, macromedia flash, macromedia shockwave shit, even java) mainly in the form of ActiveX controls everyone wanted them to go.

      Specially Flash, it was an abomination from the beginning, nobody liked it.

      Now, some people consider not supporting the SWF blob a "problem", it is really funny because usually geeks (the type luring on slashdot) do not like to recognize they were wrong when they loathed flash.

      Now, I do not like Apple so this is not an "apple fanboy" defence (I consider Apple stuff overpriced and *not* for marketed for people like me). But I also do not think the SWF format is really important for the web.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    197. Re:After a month of daily use... by plalonde2 · · Score: 1

      Having typed SMSs on phones and having typed on an iPad - what the hell are you talking about? I wouldn't want to write a novel, but short emails, SMS, tweets, are much nicer on the iPad than any other non-laptop I've used.

    198. Re:After a month of daily use... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The real question is what would an OSX tablet be like?

      Would it have all of the "problems" that all of the Apple fanbois are whining about? If it does then why did they ever bother with Macs to begin with.

      Most of the "PC" problem is with malware that is invited in by poorly made vendor tools.

      The main problem with an OSX tablet is that it could completely bypass the iTunes store and play nice with all of your Windows and Linux boxes. It could play just about anything with about as much effort as you would expend loading it up with garden-of-pure-ideology apps.

      If an iPad were the perfect MCE extender, then it would tend to pop the Apple reality distortion bubble.

      Apple needs it's customers frightened and dependent and looking to Steve Jobs.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    199. Re:After a month of daily use... by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Ok, would everybody here that works in Marketing please raise your hand? ...

      Yeah, that's what I thought. Very few.

      The point is that we attack products based on technical features, not on how popular it is. Of course it's "a good product from the standpoint of the manufacturer" ... every product from any manufacturer is perfect in their own eyes. And of course it's "a good product from the standpoint of ... the consumers who purchase it" ... it meets their own needs and expectations.

      But why to the apple fanbois attack anybody who sees a serious technical downside? "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." That's a technical attack, not a commentary on how well the product will sell. Most people don't need wireless in an MP3 player and 5 GB is enough for plenty of music -- so people bought it. That doesn't mean that the iPod was the best product to ever be brought to market!

      Apple is very good at choosing the features necessary to make a product useful, and it's good at making the device appealing enough for users to ignore any features they decided to not put in.

      Of course Apple products are popular -- but that doesn't make them perfect.

    200. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the answer is a firm "it depends". If the application doesn't add anything significant over the browser experience, then I think you are right. Bad app.

      On the other hand, if the developers take advantage of what makes the iPad unique (multi-touch interface, accelerometers, location services, etc...), you end up with a better experience and its worth the added complexity.

    201. Re:After a month of daily use... by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.

      So, how long did it take to write this message on the iPad?
      I imagine you had to put down your coffee mug, put down the iPad in "notebook position... [d'oh!]" and write... or maybe you "touch typed" with your nose lol.

      Or when I want to just not carry around a 5lb brick everywhere I go when not working.

      netbooks weight at most 1.5 kg :)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    202. Re:After a month of daily use... by The+Phantom+Mensch · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This time last year I spent a few weeks travelling with some of my employers big time road warriors. Along with their corporate laptops they all carried netbooks. The netbooks gave them a personal e-mail, media and lightweight web browsing device that they could use in their off hours without having to worry about infecting the corporate machines with viruses or having the corporate snooping brigade finding out what they did in their off hours.

      The iPad is a perfect replacement for that netbook market niche. It's a better media and casual browsing machine due to the instant on nature of the OS and the "walled garden" that protects you from web site shenanigans.

    203. Re:After a month of daily use... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Netbooks are crippled.

      I've used both netbooks, and the iPad (both briefly) and from what I've seen I'd much rather have an iPad.

      Netbooks suck because they are too big to fit in your pocket, and too small to be comfortable to use the damn keyboards. And since you can't actually tuck one in your pocket, you'll have to carry it in ... a bag or something. Well at that point you might as well get a regular laptop.

      The one's I've touched ALL seem cheesy cheap flimsy. The cheapness and quality are a huge turn off for me. I'd much rather go with something like Blackberry, and if I accidentally drop it, it doesn't break. And a Rugged Laptop is a better option for hazardous usage.

      THE only redeeming value in a netbook, is that they are inexpensive. And that shows (see above) in spades.

      Come Apple with the iPad and it is just about right. It feels sturdier than netbooks, can be held in one hand, and operated with the other for most things. Its OS was designed for that application.

      And if you haven't seen the Kindle app on the iPad, it blows the Kindle away!

      All one has to remember is that the iPad is NOT a general purpose computer (like Notebooks). But then again, neither are netbooks, which are trying to be general purpose computers, and sucking at it.

      And, unlike Netbooks, iPads don't have to run goofy versions of Linux(what do you mean I can't run ___ Windows App?) or need AV like Windows.

      My conclusion is people whining about iPads not doing what they WANT only shows one thing. They are just jealous that iPads just work better than their crappy Netbooks (and Kindle), or are too cheap to buy a real device that just works.

      Look, if you think Netbooks are better for you, great, go out and get one. But when you can't do simple stuff like read an ebook or watch a movie without opening a clunky mouse driven interface designed for a real computer (not a handheld portable device), don't run complaining to me.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    204. Re:After a month of daily use... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      The majority of geeks can not see the following:

      - With a netbook/notebook you can do 100000000 things, after installing X, Y, Z program and *learning* to use the program etc etc. For "normal" people the "possibility" to be able to do 10000000 things is worth less than...
      - With the iPad you can do 100 things, but they are easy and straightforward to do.

      "normal" people prefer to have the *ability* to do 100 things than the "possibility" of doing a million.

      Really, I have seen some non-tech people coming to me telling me "look, I can do X or Y " with Windows, something that I could do with Linux for some time before... but of course for them that is a non-option.

      Few of the slashdot geeks get this. I get it and although Apple products are not for me (I do not need to pay the 100% markup for the ability to do those 100 things, I can do them in my computer now, or I can *learn* how to do them :), I understand why some people may like Apple products.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    205. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      In the '80s when some stupid people started buying crippled game consoles instead of using a proper multi-purpose computing platform.

      That fad sure passed quickly, didn't it?

    206. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one, its battery life is astounding.

      “Its”, not “it's”, dammit!

    207. Re:After a month of daily use... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.
      Or when I want to browse while standing for an hour on the train twice a day.

      Ok, given. But I'll say a mobile phone (even the iPhone) probably better serves you for these purposes. It's anecdotal, but I ride the train an hour to work every day, and I've never seen anyone whip out an iPad. A kindle, an iPhone, even other mp3 players (Zune, etc.) and smart phones, but the iPad seems to not be very popular on the train even among the massive yuppie, hipster population that rides with me. But then again, the trains I ride are often packed, to the point where even a phone takes up more room than there might be. I can imagine people whipping out iPads as easily as they would a netbook or other laptop computer.

      Or when I want to just not carry around a 5lb brick everywhere I go when not working.

      Netbooks are considerably lighter than 5lb. Not a good strawman.

      Or when I don't want unblockable popups.

      Use Firefox with NoScript on your netbook. With that, not only can I block pop-up ads, but all ads. Oh wait, but you can't do that on an iPad, so it must not count as an advantage of the netbook.

      You mean like a motorcycle instead of a car?

      People don't drive motorcycles for the same purposes as they might drive a car. You can compare a convertible to a motorcycle, but in the end, it's still not quite the same. So you can't call a motorcycle a cripped car. You can call a smart car a crippled car. But so few people drive that, it would pretty much invalidate your argument.

      You mean like a regular cell phone instead of a smart phone?

      Most people who can afford it, and who have a need for it, use smart phones. Nobody who has a data plan will use a regular phone anymore.

      You mean like a laptop instead of a desktop?

      Laptops serve a completely different function. They're not a portable desktop, so much as a portable computer.

      The iPad was, and continues to be presented as a replacement for the netbook. In order for it to replace the netbook, it has to fill the same niche. Which quite frankly, it's not so good at. It may be good at other things, in which case it wouldn't be a replacement for a netbook, but I'm not so sure about that either.

      Nor is it a good replacement for a kindle, but nobody seems to be talking about that these days...

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    208. Re:After a month of daily use... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Not only that... lots of people buy TOASTERS! when an oven will perfectly toast bread slices and also can be used to make cakes, bake poultry and meat! The Grilux even comes with a grill (although you have to solder the grill when you want to use it... but hey, it is open and so convenient).

      Why do people continue buying Toasters?? they are just a bunch of losers and stupid G&E sheeps!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    209. Re:After a month of daily use... by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      No... the alternative is to cache. A bit in RAM (with 512 MB they should be able to cache a couple of pages, you'd think), and a lot in the 16 GB+ there is. It really mystifies me why safari on iphoneO$ can't cache at all. I had browsers cache things back in the days where 16MB (yes MEGA) was the memory I had for the entire machine!

    210. Re:After a month of daily use... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Aha! so now I get it...

      The iPad is the next step in the Apple "holier than you" social status accessory implementation:

      iPad user in London tube: "Look at me, I have an iPad... I paid a lot of cash for this; I look cool; shit, I don't *even* need a keyboard... am I not cool?"
       

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    211. Re:After a month of daily use... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      "OS that allows the installation of arbitrary non approved applications"

      AND often without user actually wanting it!!! WOOT Job Security for me! Yay.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    212. Re:After a month of daily use... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Second for iTeleport. I've used it since it was called tunnel (iirc) on the iPod Touch and it's simply flawless. RowMote Pro is also excellent for controlling multimedia apps like front row and xbmc.

    213. Re:After a month of daily use... by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm no Apple fanboy - I have not owned anything from Apple since the Apple IIe, but I recently recommended ordering a number of pads for our company's salesmen. They look nice, they are simple as shit, and they are just fine for showing the product to the customers, and accessing the company's webpages. I am even reworking some of the existing front ends to our ERP software to fit the iPad's limited abilities.

      So, yeah, it can be a productivity tool. We tried doing the same with Acer notebooks, and of the four people who tested the idea, one broke his notebook physically, two got totally swamped with viruses (salesmen are dumb as shit and like their porn) and the fourth uses it to this day... but the project got killed. We now have two testing using the iPad, and three weeks into it, they are both happy. The notebook guy is also an ardent proponent to getting iPads... So we have 42 on order.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    214. Re:After a month of daily use... by jkoke · · Score: 1

      The reloading bit has to do with the limited (relatively) amount of RAM that the iPad has (256M). When memory runs low, the iPad automatically dumps the cache of the page and reloads it from the network when needed. Not much that you can do about that except wait for the next generation models which will undoubtedly have more RAM. I agree on the overall "tab" experience. It's painful and one of the weakest parts of mobile Safari. I haven't tried it yet, but I have read that Atomic Browser has a good tabbed interface which appears to work the way you want it to. You can find it on the App store.

    215. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    216. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      I played a fun game and actually predicted the entire text of your response before I even scrolled down. This person explained why he liked something and you tried to tell him why he was wrong for liking it..There are countless times where the iPad is a far superior device for surfing the web for some people than a laptop. The real question is, why would you pull out a laptop when all you want to do is look at a web page, read a few emails and watch a video?

    217. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cerium · · Score: 1

      You know, this may be the first valid argument I've ever seen for the uber-lockdown thing Apple has with the iPhone/iPad OS. As much as I hate recent Apple products, I can do nothing other than agree with this statement. Good job, sir.

    218. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      It works remarkably well actually. The overlay keyboard in most VNC iPhone/Pad clients is more than adequate for 75% of the things I do in VNC.

    219. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Use it all the time. Virtual keyboard is fine for most tasks. (Well for me all tasks, but I assume someone will come up with something they do in VNC that requires a lot of typing of odd characters).

    220. Re:After a month of daily use... by DanTheManMS · · Score: 1

      The pages reload themselves because the iPad has run out of RAM and has cleared out the background pages from memory so it can better show you the page you're currently on. Unfortunate that Apple didn't stick another 256 MB in there to prevent that sort of thing.

      That said, I browse pages the same way, and it's for that very reason that I love VanillaSurf for the iPhone/iTouch - it lets you open a link in a new background tab without switching to it immediately. It's got some other features (downloads, bookmark syncing, fullscreen browsing, stuff like that) but honestly it's the tab handling that makes me use it more than Safari when possible. No clue if there's an iPad version or not, but it's definitely worth a look.

    221. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Having typed SMSs on phones and having typed on an iPad - what the hell are you talking about? I wouldn't want to write a novel, but short emails, SMS, tweets, are much nicer on the iPad than any other non-laptop I've used.

      Well, we've both typed on phones and on the iPad, and I don't understand your sentiment any better than you understand mine. I'd take the keyboard on the T-Mobile G1, the Samsung Alias, even the Motorola Droid over the keyboard on the iPad any day.

      At least we can agree that opinions are divided as to the usefulness of the iPad's keyboard, right?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    222. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the video card on my desktop machine will also toast bread.

    223. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Wear a black turtleneck and no one will notice your jeans. :)

    224. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Your clearly on a rampage to try and convince people who like their ipads that they shouldn't. Guy who owns one says the on-screen keyboard works for him. You point out you touched one once and it sucked. It is getting kind of silly.

    225. Re:After a month of daily use... by AtomicOrange · · Score: 0

      Smug looks and wearing the t-shirt of a band that was around before you were born will likely aid entry as well.

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
    226. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      You would not be in the demographic for the iPad, perhaps you should buy a netbook.... The market it still exists it just became a different niche.

    227. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      NM. I am sure you know how ridiculous your comment was :)

    228. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      You also described 75-80% of the people I know that bought netbooks :)

    229. Re:After a month of daily use... by neuroklinik · · Score: 1

      I think you'd be surprised how many real geeks use apple devices.

      Agreed.

      I'm 35. I got my first computer (a TRS-80 CoCo 1) in 1980. I was writing pretty sophisticated code by the mid- to late-80's. Wrote a wardialer for OS-9 Level II when I was in my teens. I've been professionally involved in IT (engineering, consulting and management) for well over a decade. I own or have owned most easily obtainable computing platforms, often just for the sake of exploration and learning. I recently bought an old HP-9000/735 just to play around with NeXTStep PA-RISC. I do system administration for various flavors of Windows, Linux, and Unix, including Mac OS X.

      By almost any account, I'm a hardcore geek. And I love my iPad. If anything, just because it's a new platform to explore. But also because it's a great kick-back and relax device for content consumption and play.

      For some reason, there's a group of people out there who view the iPad as a threat of some kind. I frankly just don't get it. Apple's not forcing anyone to buy or use their products, and they aren't trying to take away your "real" computer. If you don't want one, don't buy it. But, leave those who do buy it in peace. The iPad appeals to a wide class of people: both hardcore geeks like myself who are eager to explore the new platform, and also to people who really don't want to put up with the complexity of traditional computers just for the sake of sending an email to their family.

    230. Re:After a month of daily use... by newDzerzhinsky · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded up?

      They're not hard to find. You don't even need to live near an Apple store: I went to Best Buy and saw a whole table of iPads.

      I guess that would depend on where in the World you live!

    231. Re:After a month of daily use... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      I was using Linux before SLS came out and I can assure you for most people, Windows is in fact a better product than Linux. OS X gets slowed down because it is targeted at a premium market because Apple is concerned with profits and not market share.

      Linux still has a lot of issues that make it difficult for most people to use as their primary OS.

    232. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      and yet, somehow, 1 million people and counting disagree with you...

      Not really. As I was modded into oblivion for saying over here, people buy toys in large numbers too. The iPad is selling well because it's cool, shiny, and new -- not because the reasons people have been rejecting tablet computers for 15 years suddenly stopped being valid. When the novelty wears off, what'll be left is a device that combines the disadvantages of a smartphone with the disadvantages of a laptop, and few of the advantages of either.

      It's an appliance that has just enough ability to be turned into something else to keep the "geek toy" crowd happy too, that's what you're missing.

      A smartphone is an appliance too, but it fits in your pocket, doesn't tire your wrists out from holding it up, and costs less than an iPad. Even a netbook can be dumbed down into an appliance, if that's what you want.

      It's like arguing that my freezer (no, you dont get a car analogy!) at home doesnt work like a commercial, programmable, walk-in unit.

      I'd say it's more like arguing that your freezer at home costs more, does less, and is less convenient than other home freezers: that every requirement you have for a freezer would have been filled better by buying a different model.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    233. Re:After a month of daily use... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That's perfectly fine. "Better" is highly subjective in cases like these. The point is that there are a whole lot of people on Slashdot who think that Windows is an inferior product. It would be wise to keep in mind that pure marketshare isn't the only indicator to use when determining if you have a successful product.

    234. Re:After a month of daily use... by clo1_2000 · · Score: 1

      I'm one of the people this article mentions. I really just needed a netbook around the house and after 1 month I'm completely happy with the iPad. I read books and play games or study Japanese on BART and in my house I check email, surf the web or stream movies. More expensive than netbook, yes, but I like it.

      --
      "In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change" --Thich Nhat Hanh
    235. Re:After a month of daily use... by Richy_T · · Score: 1
    236. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Your clearly on a rampage to try and convince people who like their ipads that they shouldn't.

      Not at all! You seem to have misunderstood me.

      If he likes his iPad and feels like he's getting his money's worth, good for him. But most people would be better off buying something else: everything the iPad does is done better by a different device.

      Those other devices aren't always as shiny, cool, or new as the iPad, which suggests a reason that the iPad is selling well: novelty and marketing. There's nothing wrong with buying expensive toys. If you think the iPad is cool enough to justify spending the extra money for something less functional and convenient than the alternatives, I'm not going to talk you out of it -- but I won't recommend it either.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    237. Re:After a month of daily use... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      That's odd. I tried making porn and ended up downloading The Onion http://www.theonion.com/

    238. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely though, I think sites like Rotten Tomatoes are generally working to get away from Flash and Silverlight. This, I think, is a good thing. There are enough iPad's out there to make moving away from Flash worthwhile

      Yes, thank god a huge corporation is finally using its domination of a particular industry to force its way on others. I haven't been so happy since Microsoft liberated us from that crappy Netscape browser.

    239. Re:After a month of daily use... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Nice one, Oscar.

    240. Re:After a month of daily use... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      And I guess they're concerned about violating Microsoft patents with that.

    241. Re:After a month of daily use... by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      As to flash, I don't have it installed on most of my browsers, so it's not like you're missing anything. I can't view flash on my current machine because I've chosen to do without it -- it' hardly mandatory. In fact, it's a bloody nuisance.

      It never ceases to amaze me the bitchfest people have about no flash support. I am a sysadmin who uses the internet very heavily, Often it will be a month or so before a user or myself notices that the flash plugin was not installed on the image that was used...and you know how we notice it? Some damn advert wants to use it.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    242. Re:After a month of daily use... by wish+bot · · Score: 1

      Wow, a sane and reasonable geek, AND on Slashdot :)

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    243. Re:After a month of daily use... by wish+bot · · Score: 1

      I'm not as polite as Sancho - if you think that, then you're a complete fool. And you're probably running a malware infected PC right now.

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    244. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      It's not a a radically different philosophy. Kids who are interested in computers will get one (or more) that they can do what they want to with. If they're not interested in computers it won't matter. Some kids learn to play guitar and have no use for computers, for example. Heck, I'm 60 and learned programming back in the punch card days. I was into ham radio as a kid so computers (when they came along) were (and are still) neat to me. One brother hated electronics (he's a dentist and still hates electronics and he hates computers). None of the 5 of us were particularly bored when we were kids and there wasn't such a thing as a personal computer. The fact that an iPad is not a full fledged computer (I personally have no use for one) has nothing to do with childhood development and personalities. Don't get me wrong. When my daughter was 2 years old in 1990 I bought her a PC (I had a Mac but her mother wanted me to get a PC, since she used one at work, so they could both use it). I wanted my daughter to have that advantage. I bought games for her to play, spelling games and stuff like that. At the same time, back in those days you bought the base computer. If you wanted more than a beep you had to buy a sound card. The sound card would work with some software, but not with other software. I won't go on about the 'PC Hell' (and expense), but she's now 21 and can use just about any computer, but she doesn't particularly like them. She was never interested in programming, and I didn't push her into it. She did have her Tae kwon do blue belt or brown belt (I forget which off hand) at age 8 (she started at age 4 but then at age 8 she decided that wasn't fun anymore, quit and took up learning to play the violin). She's 21 now and finishing up college on a baseball scholarship. Each of us chooses our own path and an iPad just isn't an issue.

    245. Re:After a month of daily use... by wish+bot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure they're laughing inside directly at you. I'm sure they're not actually doing anything useful like reading the news or caching up on a book - so that they're better informed for the day ahead, or enriching their life.

      Maybe those people who you think are 'cool' actually are cool because they spend their lives, you know....living? Rather than whining?

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    246. Re:After a month of daily use... by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      If you can figure out how I can support my lifestyle

      Your missing the point, that is a lifestyle. It sounds like you are working too hard to support your "lifestyle" and as a result have no lifestyle. I assume that by "lifestyle" you mean stuff. Maybe you should just buy less stuff and then you would have some extra time.

    247. Re:After a month of daily use... by wish+bot · · Score: 1

      He was completely justified in calling feepness out. "Cool story, bro" conveys exactly the right blend of disbelief and exasperation that many of us feel in these ridiculous discussions considering the supposed critical faculty of fellow geeks.

      No need to ride in to protect the innocent here, Mr action hero.

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    248. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points today, but if I did I'd mod you up. You are right on.

    249. Re:After a month of daily use... by WitnessForTheOffense · · Score: 1

      And I'll leave this right here: http://adblockplus.org/en/

    250. Re:After a month of daily use... by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      My sister made me this hat, you insensitive clod!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    251. Re:After a month of daily use... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      reminder to self, never type a /. post while working on math models, you get too distracted

      Wait, Math has Models in it now? Supermodels or regular? Ah, who cares? I'd like to up-size my math minor to a B.S. please.

    252. Re:After a month of daily use... by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Kids these days...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    253. Re:After a month of daily use... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      How much RAM does it take to cache a web page? It's not as though I have loads of background applications. Can't it maybe use some of the monster SSD for swap?

      I don't know. Seems retarded.

    254. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      I still anxiously look forward to a time when no generation is left alive that grew up without a computer in the home.

      Why do you want us old people to be dead soon? You *must* be young. I'm 60. I grew up when there was no such thing as a personal computer. Heck a family was lucky if it had a typewriter. I cut my teeth programming with punch cards. You kids have it *so* easy today that you have absolutely no idea. And for you to say you: "...anxiously look forward to a time when no generation is left alive that grew up without a computer in the home..." is pretty silly. Are us old people holding back the world? My son, you'll be old one day if you're lucky. I suggest that you start preparing.

    255. Re:After a month of daily use... by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      How much typing do you actually do LOOKING AT and READING reading the web? Have you even looked at the iPad, because of the intuitive and out of the way interface it has almost as much real estate than most 13" laptops. And it's easier to move around the house with than any laptop larger than that with less burning on the legs and more easily sat in a position that is comfortable to view (or stress your wrists with carpal tunnel).

      Do the world a favor and not comment on the iPad until you've actually used one.

    256. Re:After a month of daily use... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      A turtleneck sweater would not be amiss, either.

    257. Re:After a month of daily use... by DanTheManMS · · Score: 1

      Depends on the page, but I can visibly watch my available RAM go down from its starting point of 140 MB down to 20 if I've got lots of pages open (I'm jailbroken and have the free RAM count display in my status bar at all times). Let's just say that the iPhone's 8-tab limit really is a best-case scenario.

      You wouldn't want to use SSD as swap due to the limited number of reads and writes it can handle, though for basic cache (like saving the webpage for offline use) I don't really know why it isn't implemented.

    258. Re:After a month of daily use... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      I regularly look up things on the web with my iPhone when I'm at home, or out and about. I don't *want* flash, and the keyboard (yes there is one... and it's actually quite easy/fast to use) tends to only be used for entering a search query, or login details.

      Hardly a crippled device, apart from the screen size. It does everything it needs to do and saves turning on a computer or even having one in the livingroom.

    259. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      I think that when you wrote "fascist" you meant "authoritarian".

    260. Re:After a month of daily use... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Are you really that arrogant that you really think you know what is better for most people? The iPad has a lot of advantages, it is an instant on device that runs tons of apps. I have been using Netbooks since the HP Jornada and I'll let you in on a secret: they suck. Back when they ran Windows CE is was an absolute pain getting applications on and off the devices, and it was slow getting files off as they connected via serial port. The modern versions that run Windows are a pain to get applications on (most lack optical drives) and most run Windows poorly (in addition to not being instant on). I have yet to use a Linux Netbook that is instant on, but at least the application installing is better as almost all distributions use online repositories now days. Steve Jobs was dead on when describing Netbooks: there is not a single thing they do better than a laptop or desktop, they do the same things but do them worse. The only possible upticks of are a couple of pounds lighter, a few cubic inches less volume, and possibly better battery life. I don't own an iPad, and am probably not going to buy the current version, but it is a pretty neat device and I really enjoy surfing the web on them.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    261. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better screen for the price? Can you point me an another IPS screen device under the 500$ mark? Including digital photo frame.

      Flash: Get over it, flash is as good as VB6. Its time for evolve. If you want interpret coding, let the browser/device interpret the code, not an external gizmo.

      The keyboard is a non-issue as long the iPad is an media consumption device, not a production device. And if you still want to type on it you're free to get an external keyboard.

      What you can really do more on a Netbook? I agree since running Window on it make it able to run anything at the slowess speed, but forget about gaming, high-end apps, and have you try Word 2007 lately on a 1024x640 resolution? the ruban gui took like the half of the screen. No software are specifically made for Netbook. This is why netbook is failing vs the iPad.

    262. Re:After a month of daily use... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that this is what most people use netbooks for... Web, e-mail, playing music, simple online games or solitaire.

      It's really not surprising that the iPad is destroying netbook sales here as it presents that functionality in an intuitive and aesthetically pleasing way. Most people don't care about the keyboard... they wouldn't be using it most of the time on a PC either.

      Sure, it isn't appealing to a lot of people on this site who like to mess about with computers, do coding, etc, but that's not who it's aimed at. I'm surprised at the amount of people here who don't understand that.

    263. Re:After a month of daily use... by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      OTOH, I just logged into a server via ssh and also worked remotely via NX while lying on my couch today. So, a netbook does have its advantages. Now if I could get some more screen pixels in the same form factor...

    264. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      You are essentially complaining about a device which clearly isn't suitable for your intended use. My advice: Don't buy one. BTW - I use Firefox with flashblock for a reason. If a web page needs flash to work, I don't go back. And please, don't start on about all the 'great' flash games or how you can't play the Farm game on Facebook without Flash or something... Personally I don't have any use for an iPad. It doesn't do what I need a computer for. The iPad is not suitable for my intended use, so I have no plans to buy one. I don't have any use for a netbook either. Netbooks, as well, are not suitable for my intended use and I have no need or desire to buy a netbook. But - You won't find me here bitching about all the inadequacies of netbooks.

    265. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      Why, oh why, are you comparing an iPad to a netbook? It's not a netbook and it's not meant to be. If you need what a netbook offers, buy a netbook. I don't have a need for, or want, either myself. As to flash, I use flashblock and *love* it. If I did have a need for an iPad, that flashblock is 'built in' (ahem) would be a plus for me.

    266. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      You're right. I agree 100%. Apple *will* make a metric a**load more money selling to novices than advanced users because there are so many more novices. So many people bash Apple for not being big in the corporate world. From the iPod to the iPhone (and so far it looks like the iPad is a hit) it's one success after another because Apple is aiming for the consumer market which is much bigger than the corporate market, and Apple is giving the consumers what they want, and what they can easily use.

    267. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Friend Stories = FAIL.

    268. Re:After a month of daily use... by fenix849 · · Score: 1

      I hope you're not seriously even thinking about comparing iphone games, to pc/xbox/ps3 games? The cheap arse Wii games maybe, the xbox live arcade games, sure.. But not full dvd titles for the big three hardcore gaming platforms. People buy apple i* for the same reason they buy acer/lenovo/hp/dell desktops, because its simple, and they're not really required to think about anything more than which model they want. Apple's slick marketing doesn't hurt either. I think most geeks are anti-apple because they fear that the high end hardware and pc architecture that they rely on do to do the things only they know how to, could be displaced by ultra simplified locked down fisher price computing hardware.

    269. Re:After a month of daily use... by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      > When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.

      I don't want to burst your bubble, but I have an iPad and it's horrible for that. At least a laptop sits nicely on your lap and holds it's own screen so you can read it easily. The iPad has to be held constantly, nursed like a baby. Any kind of background lighting causes reflections so you need to hold it just so which can be very unergonomic. Furthermore, Safari is horrific to use because of how it handles new windows (no tabs, it takes about 3 seconds for a window to open with ridiculous zooming in and out animations ....).

    270. Re:After a month of daily use... by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      I agree about touch interface for the scrolling being a nice feature, but don't forget, there is a whole category of netbooks now emerging that support touch screens as well. Touch screen != iPad.

    271. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of us know what the technology can do find a fascist locked down appliance limiting.

      Fascist? Really? Obviously you don't know the definition of the word Fascist: Here's some help - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism Not to mention your grammar isn't all that hot. That's quite the sentence! I'm too lazy to fix it for you, though.

    272. Re:After a month of daily use... by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      all because Steve has a chip on his shoulder.

      Actually, that chip is inside his head, but close. Resistance is futile ...

    273. Re:After a month of daily use... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      All the talk in the world about HTML 5 doesn't change the fact that many, many web sites use Flash, or that there's no HTML 5 equivalent of the Flash developer tools. Until either the iPad changes or the web changes, the iPad will be cut off from a big part of the web.

      True, but it's a part that Apple is okay with their users being cut off from. When I think about what Flash is used for, mostly I think of games; and the iPad already has, by virtue of the app store, thousands of games available. iPad owners aren't going to miss it much. Besides games, the other big app for Flash is video. I honestly don't know where the iPad stands with respect to video, so I can't comment on it, but I'm under the impression that most of the big-name places on the web that provide video also provide H.263 or H.264 streams that iPhone OS can play natively? Or something like that?

      Comparable screen, lower price tag, actual keyboard, and uncrippled OS.

      Dude, most people don't care. Maybe it would be better if everyone had the same concerns about OS openness that we do, but they don't, and that's unlikely to ever change. The underlying OS and internals of tech are not interesting to the overwhelming majority of people, no matter how interesting they are to you and me.

      For the record, I despise the walled garden that is Apple and have never once given them any money. Their products are not for me, and I don't like their corporate behavior. But to act like they don't know what they're doing is ludicrous.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    274. Re:After a month of daily use... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I've heard time and time again that Windows based tablets blow because of lack of touch support, that is why the iPad OS rocks, etc etc. Does it then seem a tad ironic to anyone that it suddenly becomes all good again when you are accessing that Windows desktop *through* and iPad??

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    275. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Can you point me an another IPS screen device under the 500$ mark?

      Probably not, but at least one device has a screen that works better than the iPad's under diverse lighting conditions.

      Flash: Get over it, flash is as good as VB6. Its time for evolve.

      Tell that to the countless web sites that use Flash. Content has to evolve first, then it will be time for devices to stop supporting the old technology.

      And content won't evolve until developer tools do. Flash has great developer tools, which is what made it popular in the first place. Where are the equivalents for HTML 5 (or whatever else you think should replace Flash)? Or are you somehow going to convince an artist to write a thousand lines of JavaScript instead of drawing a few keyframes in Flash?

      What you can really do more on a Netbook?

      Type blog posts and emails, edit documents (try OpenOffice or an older MS Office if you think the ribbon is too big), play thousands of popular Flash games and PC games, visit web sites and have them "just work" instead of showing blue squares where the unsupported plugins should be, watch DivX videos...

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    276. Re:After a month of daily use... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      That does sound awesome - sit around all day, surf the web, read email, and watch video.

      Well, you have a slashdot account, so you've already made the first step towards your new life.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    277. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      Get pants and shirts with bigger pockets.... ;)

    278. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      You are essentially complaining about a device which clearly isn't suitable for your intended use.

      You're missing the larger point: it's only suitable for a couple niche uses.

      Busy doctor who wants to replace his clipboard? OK. Traveling chess player who wants to replace his board with a virtual one? I guess. But... who else?

      That's the problem. For just about every "intended use", you're better off with something other than a tablet computer. And even in the rare cases where you need a tablet computer, it's hard to see how the iPad is better than competing tablets.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    279. Re:After a month of daily use... by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      I don't hear many people complaining about not being able to write novels on their Playstations.

      Sure, but almost everyone already has a notebook that can surf the web just fine -- in fact, a lot better than an iPad. The iPad isn't adding new functionality, like a Playstation; it's replacing what you already have, but giving you less.

      If you have the money to spend $500+ on a fancy web-surfing device for your lounge room, then that's great. Maybe you don't like to write long emails, or chat to people. Maybe you have no need of a keyboard. But it seems an unnecessary extravagance to me.

    280. Re:After a month of daily use... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      When I'm reading through a page, if I come across a link that interests me, I open it in a new tab in the background.

      Try Instapaper It also syncs between your iPad/iPhone and your desktop/laptop.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    281. Re:After a month of daily use... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop?

      Because the interface is so much better for web browsing than a laptop. The silky-smooth touch screen is much easier for scrolling through pages than arrow keys, mouse scroll wheels, trackpads, scroll bars, etc. You just interact directly with the pages. In comparison, the laptop interface just gets in the way, adding another layer between you and the content.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    282. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Are you really that arrogant that you really think you know what is better for most people?

      Arrogance has nothing to do with it. All you have to do is look at the capabilities of the iPad and compare that to the capabilities of other devices.

      If you don't mind spending a couple hundred bucks extra for something that's trendy and new, don't let me stop you. There's nothing wrong with buying a toy. But don't pretend it's going to enable you to do something you couldn't already do better on another device.

      The modern versions that run Windows are a pain to get applications on (most lack optical drives) and most run Windows poorly (in addition to not being instant on).

      1. Download software from the internet.

      2. Use sleep mode if you want instant-on.

      Steve Jobs was dead on when describing Netbooks: there is not a single thing they do better than a laptop or desktop, they do the same things but do them worse. The only possible upticks of are a couple of pounds lighter, a few cubic inches less volume, and possibly better battery life.

      He was dead wrong, and you prove it with your very next sentence. Added portability and longer battery life are the whole point of netbooks!

      What he said is actually true of the iPad, though: there's not a single thing the iPad does better than a smartphone or netbook. It does the same things, but does them worse. It's no more portable than a netbook, and its battery life isn't much longer. It doesn't do anything the iPhone doesn't also do, it's just bigger.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    283. Re:After a month of daily use... by fredmosby · · Score: 1

      Either you have to contradict all of your past propaganda about how robust Macs are, or you have to admit that the iPad is not nearly as "suitable" as you want to make it out to be.

      No I don't. I can just say Mac OS is better than Windows, but iPad OS is better than Mac OS.

    284. Re:After a month of daily use... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      No doubt. I'm really eager to see how those feel. I expect to see system designers taking some cues from the iPad, and I really hope that touch-scroll is one of them.

      Most of the tablets I played with a few years ago were pretty lousy (and scroll wasn't implemented for dragging on the screen--at least, not in any settings I could find.)

    285. Re:After a month of daily use... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.

      So that's what the kids are calling it these days.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    286. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Dude, most people don't care. Maybe it would be better if everyone had the same concerns about OS openness that we do, but they don't, and that's unlikely to ever change.

      I don't think that's entirely true. It's not hard to rattle off a list of things you can do on Device X but not on the iPhone/iPad, specifically because of the chip on Steve's shoulder.

      "Check out this app I just got on my phone, it turns the ringer off automatically when I get to work and back on when I leave work. I know, cool, right? I'd send you the link, but there's no iPhone version..."

      You don't even need to get into the technical explanation, because it's not just a technical problem. The end result is that users can't get certain applications.

      For the record, I despise the walled garden that is Apple and have never once given them any money. Their products are not for me, and I don't like their corporate behavior. But to act like they don't know what they're doing is ludicrous.

      Oh, I agree completely. They're making plenty of money, which is what they set out to do. But that's not really a point in the device's favor unless you own Apple stock.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    287. Re:After a month of daily use... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I've also been using computers long enough to remember why "everyone" hates Microsoft...

      I've been paying enough attention to tell that Apple are doing exactly what Microsoft did to make us hate them so much.

      So why does Apple get a free pass?

      BTW, there are people that love MS, these people are typically called boss.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    288. Re:After a month of daily use... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      > Tiny screen?
      Not. Smaller than a 15.6" laptop? Sure but bigger or equivalent to most netbooks.

      But for A$700 I can buy a 13" notebook equivalent to a 13" Macbook (which costs over A$1400) with a 3G transmitter. You can bet that the Ipad will cost more then A$700, I'm betting on A$999.

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      Yes, just because lord steve says a large section of the web does not exist does not make it so. I use flashblock but flash is still a large part of the things I see and do on the web. Further more there are many sites who simply wont bother changing to a format that is still up in the air and quite expensive (in terms of labour) to switch to. Don't just focus on the tiny subset of media sites, focus more on hotels, ISP control panels and other businesses and the other sites that outnumber them 20 to 1. For at least the next five years (probably 10) it will be cheaper to build in flash the HTML 5.

      If I didn't have flash when booking a holiday I'd have no idea what the rooms I've booked look like.

      > no keyboard
      Really?! You point this out? Have you RTFM'd? On screen keyboard in landscape mode does fine for typing pretty long missives -- longer than this one. Bluetooth keyboards take you to the next level.

      Lack of physical feedback. I dread reading SMS's and other posts from people with Iphones because they are just so full of typos and bad grammar that its painful. Plus it takes three times as long as it did to type out on my HTC Dream and that is far slower then a full sized 104 key keyboard. A lot of mundanes can touch type these days, touchscreen KB's prevent this.

      It's really not "crippled" or "limited", not in the knee-jerk manner most consider.

      I dont like the browser, can I get one with a different rendering engine like Chrome or Opera.
      I dont like the mail client, can I get one with the features of Touchdown or Gmail on Android
      I dont like not having flash, can I get it?

      This is a real problem, not a knee jerk reaction. Especially when you can be banished from the App Store for just mentioning the name of one of their competitors.

      My favorite app? iSSH (with VNC tunneling support)

      So you're telling me I need a separate computer just to do things I want to do. Why don't I simply buy a laptop in the first place and have done with.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    289. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      I agree, but then again... If sales of the iPad continue as they are, it appears to be filling a very big niche. Techies are a relatively small niche. Apple wants to sell to a large niche so they designed for the large niche, not the small techie niche. Larger target niche, more sales, and, as we all know .... = PROFIT!

    290. Re:After a month of daily use... by Draek · · Score: 1

      I have been using Netbooks since the HP Jornada and I'll let you in on a secret: they suck.

      Allow me to quote:

      Are you really that arrogant that you really think you know what is better for most people?

      For most people netbooks work and work well, and given their relative sales figures, they work better than an iPad would in its place. Or would you be so arrogant to believe you know what's better for them?

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    291. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      If sales of the iPad continue as they are, it appears to be filling a very big niche.

      I don't know about that. Remember Furby? Tickle Me Elmo? Massive sales, store workers were trampled by mobs eager to buy them, but where are they now?

      The niche they filled was "shiny new toy". By definition, nothing can fill it for long. I suspect the iPad is headed the same way.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    292. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much everything supports VNC. It is useful for remotely accessing any platform, Windows, Macs, Linux boxes, BSD, what-have-you.

    293. Re:After a month of daily use... by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. Time will tell. Apple has had, and, like *every* company, will have in the future, products that fail.

    294. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And undoubtedly i* users will still say Flash is crappy, etc., and the user experience is still good, etc.

    295. Re:After a month of daily use... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Without a (convenient) keyboard? I'm skeptical, but open to discussion.

      Just use any Bluetooth keyboard.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    296. Re:After a month of daily use... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying an iPad would always be better. I use a Netbook, and as I said I don't think I'll be buying the current iPad. I still stand by my assessment that Netbooks suck. Just because you have the right tool for the job doesn't mean it is a good tool.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    297. Re:After a month of daily use... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      They won't let me in. My jeans are not sufficiently tight enough to be deemed a "cool cat."

      Nope, they are too loose, try pulling them up to cover your ass.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    298. Re:After a month of daily use... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Just because something is capable of something doesn't mean it is good at it. My Netbook is capable of running Photoshop, but I would rather be stabbed with a dull knife. For downloading I have no idea where I can download and install Office, Quicken, or TurboTax legally. And sleep is not instant on. Hibernate is closer, but still not there. I have had countless times I've gone to boot a Netbook or Laptop that I left in sleep for a week only to find the battery had completely drained. I have yet to find a Netbook with a 10 hour battery life (and idling on the lowest brightness while muted with WiFi turned off doesn't count). My friend's iPad gets close to 10 hours watching movies streamed over WiFi. I would much rather surf the web on an iPad. There are several things I would say an iPad does better. The current generation isn't for me, but it is a pretty neat device.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    299. Re:After a month of daily use... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I have never owned a laptop with screen resolution as low as an iPad.

      Are you even old enough to drink?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    300. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      No, I think I wasn't clear.

      A bunch of people are saying an iPad is an idiot device because it costs as much as a real computer but does less.

      I was making the same statement about game consoles. Why buy one when a computer can play games just as well and do so many other things.

      For the record, I have an iPad and a PS3.

      I'm not worried about the future of computing. You still need a computer to write the iPad software on. I really think something like the iPad grows the market and only creates more opportunities for geeks like us.

    301. Re:After a month of daily use... by mirix · · Score: 1

      Flash is evil, but at this point support for it is a necessary evil. That makes sense, doesn't it?

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    302. Re:After a month of daily use... by DeadS0ul · · Score: 1

      to each their own. I prefer the netbook. An Asus 1005PE is great for streaming TV shows from the web. Watching TV using XBMC (I have a mythtv server at home). Browsing the web, reading blogs and articles, emailing. I can hook up a mouse to it, copy pictures from my camera using the built in card reader. Browse the net anywhere using the WiFi or tether it with my phone and use 3G. It's battery life is awesome 14 hours, It's build quality is great. The price is amazing, $370 here in Hong Kong. I guess it depends how you use the device. a lot of things I mentioned wouldn't work on the iPad. I loved the iPad's idea, and I wanted a tablet for the longest time, but a netbook was more flexible, cheaper, and easier to use.

    303. Re:After a month of daily use... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      You don't even need to get into the technical explanation, because it's not just a technical problem. The end result is that users can't get certain applications.

      In theory, you're right. In practice, are there any substantial number of cool apps that don't have an iPhone OS version? I have no idea, but I imagine that that's not the case. ("Cool" doesn't mean what you think is cool; you're a computer nerd and, like me, are uncool by definition :))

      But that's not really a point in the device's favor unless you own Apple stock.

      I'm not saying its popularity somehow makes it a better device; I know better than that. What I'm saying is that earlier you pointed out that it doesn't support Flash, as if to indicate that Apple made a mistake or doesn't know what they're doing. To me it seems fairly obvious that Apple does know what they're doing, even if what they're doing is being walled-garden assholes.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    304. Re:After a month of daily use... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      how do you hold it? if it sits in your lap the viewing angle is terrible. how do you get the right viewing angle without holding it with one hand?

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    305. Re:After a month of daily use... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Actually the screen size isn't a problem because I tend to have the screen closer to my face than a laptop.

      yeah I agree - my phone is like that. Makes me go a bit cross-eyed but if I hold it close enough it looks really big.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    306. Re:After a month of daily use... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      hating flash is not the same as avoiding all websites with flash content. Until flash disappears from the web (see the "hating flash" bit), we still NEED it. This isn't about preferences, its about not cutting off your leg.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    307. Re:After a month of daily use... by dudpixel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      let me point out the amount of FAIL I can see here:

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.

      Until you want to, you know, scroll down. Which do you put down, the iPad or the coffee?
      A netbook would sit comfortably in your lap. coffee in one hand, mouse in the other.

      Or when I want to browse while standing for an hour on the train twice a day.

      So if you're on a train, one hand is holding onto something for balance, and the other is holding a rather large device to do the same as what most other people are doing on their phones. And guess what, you cant scroll down without either putting your iPad on the floor or risking falling over.

      Or when I want to just not carry around a 5lb brick everywhere I go when not working.

      You must have big pockets. I wouldn't want to carry anything around that was bigger than my phone. If it doesn't fit in my jeans pocket - it's inconvenient.

      Or when I don't want unblockable popups.

      nice troll - most browsers block popups these days. You're promoting the lack of flash as a feature, but I'm pretty sure you can disable flash on your netbook if you wanted the same "experience".

      ... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      You mean like a motorcycle instead of a car?

      Meh, each to their own preference, they appeal to different markets, and most people prefer cars.

      You mean like a regular cell phone instead of a smart phone?

      The world is moving to smartphones - again, not the direction you were infering.

      You mean like a laptop instead of a desktop?

      There is nothing about a laptop that makes it inferior to a desktop, except for the keyboard maybe. But it actually gives you MORE than a desktop, in that it is portable. Unless you mean netbook, but then most people dont use those instead of their desktop. They use it when they are away from their desktop.

      Many people like to use whatever is appropriate to the task.

      This is true. However I suspect many iPad owners try to make the iPad appropriate to ANY task, rather than applying the above (in which case most of them wouldn't need one).

      I find a netbook much more appropriate for browsing the web from my couch, or whatever other computing task I might like to do. Unless I go out somewhere, in which case my (android) phone is just fine.

      Your examples were all poor. I can certainly see your argument, but I disagree and have provided the flip-side for your amusement :)

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    308. Re:After a month of daily use... by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      I really agree. For a couple hundred dollars less (or even less than that) you can get a netbook that will do more than the iPad. I own an iPhone and it does me no good to get a device that does less than what my iPhone does but in a larger package. I happen to like my Lenovo T60 and I tether it to my jailbroken iPhone. Guess I don't really help the netbook plight when it comes down to it.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    309. Re:After a month of daily use... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, perhaps many of them are only netbook users because nothing like the iPad existed at the time they were looking to buy such a device.

    310. Re:After a month of daily use... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    311. Re:After a month of daily use... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      If I get an iPad, I want it to be portable. Getting a Bluetooth keyboard on top of that defeats that purpose, since suddenly you're carrying around two things (at which point a netbook becomes a better investment).

      Well, if you plan on using the keyboard all the time, then obviously the iPad isn't for you. But what makes you think that most people will want to use the keyboard all the time?

      Honestly, the number one reason it sells to well is that it is very simple to use and that Apple's sales and marketing teams are amongst the best in the industry. That's it.

      This is a big myth. Sony has a very powerful brand, good design aesthetics, and knows how to make use of large amounts of money for marketing. Why aren't they as successful as Apple? If you think Apple's success is only down to marketing, you are talking pure moonshine.

    312. Re:After a month of daily use... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Because it's easier to use, much better for reading than the wide screen of most laptops, easier to hold than a laptop, and lighter to carry around? Why would I want Flash? It does have a keyboard, BTW. You can even buy one of many 3rd party or Apple physical keyboards if you need that on occasions.

    313. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      For downloading I have no idea where I can download and install Office, Quicken, or TurboTax legally.

      Office, Quicken, TurboTax. HTH!

      And sleep is not instant on.

      "Yeah, I asked for a shaggy dog, but I didn't mean that shaggy."

      Come on. What do you think the iPad does when you "turn it off"? It goes to sleep, just like the iPhone and iPod (and Android devices, and most smartphones and PDAs). When it has to do a full reboot, it takes around 15 seconds, which is nothing special.

      I have had countless times I've gone to boot a Netbook or Laptop that I left in sleep for a week only to find the battery had completely drained.

      Heh, my Mac laptop did that even if I shut it down completely. I think that's a "feature" of the battery.

      I have yet to find a Netbook with a 10 hour battery life

      Try this one, this one, or this one.

      Hell, even my full-sized laptop will run for 6 hours on a charge.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    314. Re:After a month of daily use... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I've been paying enough attention to tell that Apple are doing exactly what Microsoft did to make us hate them so much.

      They're releasing half-assed products that crash several times per day? They're trying to use their 90%+ market share in one market to wrestle competitors out of other markets while screwing the people they bought the tech they're giving away for free from? They're deliberately using broken implementations of open standards in their products to make it hard for other software to interact with it? Really? Are you absolutely sure?

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    315. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the tab design should be changed on the ipad. I would also like to see the menu button to be configurable on the left or right or bottom isde of the screen so you can easily use your tumb.

    316. Re:After a month of daily use... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      They're trying to use their 90%+ market share in one market to wrestle competitors out of other markets

      Umm, yes. They've been attacking Google at every opportunity, backstabbing Adobe, one of Apple's biggest supporters (flashbacks to what MSFT did to IBM), Suing competitor over spurious software patents whist blatantly ignoring the hardware patents of other companies and threatening Open source codecs with law suits, very Microsoftian.

      Further more, the are attempting to circumvent web standards by forcing pages to be coded for the Iwhatever. Or did you honestly believe that they were trying to use an open standard, that isn't even a standard yet (strangely reminiscent of what MS did with IE).

      They're deliberately using broken implementations of open standards in their products to make it hard for other software to interact with it?

      Like trying to force HTML 5 into H.264, or forcing flash sites switch to Apple's implementation of HTML 5. Perhaps the requirement for Iwhatever Application to be originally written in an Apple approved language also slipped your attention, deliberately making it difficult to make cross platform applications (DOS isn't done until Lotus wont run, do you see the resemblance). Maybe the banning of applications that mention Android also went unnoticed (banning something that even mentions a competitor is not anti-competitive, surely).

      So I ask again, with Apple doing the things that MS did originally to make us hate them, why do they get a free pass? What colour is the sky in your world, it must be quite different not being able to spot the obvious.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    317. Re:After a month of daily use... by mikael_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm, yes. They've been attacking Google at every opportunity, backstabbing Adobe, one of Apple's biggest supporters (flashbacks to what MSFT did to IBM), Suing competitor over spurious software patents whist blatantly ignoring the hardware patents of other companies and threatening Open source codecs with law suits, very Microsoftian.

      They don't even have a majority market share when it comes to the various markets that they're operating in, so they're not so much abusing their position as they are doing what all large corporations do, bickering and backstabbing, something which is a problem but isn't nearly as bad as when someone with practically complete control of the market does it.

      Further more, the are attempting to circumvent web standards by forcing pages to be coded for the Iwhatever. Or did you honestly believe that they were trying to use an open standard, that isn't even a standard yet (strangely reminiscent of what MS did with IE).

      Are you talking about html5? You do realize that it's not some magic "Apple HTML" but rather the next version of the HTML standard, one which is hardly backed by just Apple, right?

      Like trying to force HTML 5 into H.264, or forcing flash sites switch to Apple's implementation of HTML 5. Perhaps the requirement for Iwhatever Application to be originally written in an Apple approved language also slipped your attention, deliberately making it difficult to make cross platform applications (DOS isn't done until Lotus wont run, do you see the resemblance). Maybe the banning of applications that mention Android also went unnoticed (banning something that even mentions a competitor is not anti-competitive, surely).

      They're not the only backers of H.264 as the HTML 5 default for video, and there are actually plenty of sound technical reasons for preferring H.264 over Theora.

      When you say "flash sites" do you by any chance mean video websites? Because yes, the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad don't support Flash, a decision which isn't all good or all bad, while Flash support would've been nice my experience with mobile devices and Flash is that the current state of it is just horrible, combine that with the history of Flash performance problems on OS X and it sort of makes sense that Apple would rather bet on HTML 5 than trust Adobe to magically pull an efficient and stable Flash release for the iPhone/iPad OS...

      There's nothing illegal about being anti-competitive, in fact most companies are pretty anti-competitive, it's when you control a market that it becomes illegal. When it comes to morality it may be wrong but I don't see why we should hold Apple to a higher standard than other large corporations, they're not the ones who have the "Do no evil" mantra.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    318. Re:After a month of daily use... by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      Think about it for a minute. There is a huge contingent of diehard Flash haters here on /. and then you have this post, which decries the lack of Flash on the iPad.

      Hint: Slashdot isn't one monolithic group entity. It is a population of individuals, many of whom love flash, many of whom hate it, and some of whom drop reflexivly to their knees when Steve Jobs enters the room.

      And that doesn't even covor the large portion of said population that is ambivelant about various technologies (like flash well enough, find it annoying, wouldn't want to be without it when watching youtube), excited but reserved in judgement about others (HTML5? Looks promising, if google can deliver an unencumbered video format to compete with H.264 and muscle it into the defacto web standards), and disturbed by the policies of some technology companies whose long term strategy seems to include vendor lockin, and restrictions on where that technology can take us (Microsoft's desktop monopoly, Apple's attempt at a vertical monopoly restrictive of just about every development model, Apple's random habit of banning apps for no good reason from the user's point of view, but very good reason from an aspiring monopolist's, Oracles treatment of Sun firmware and Open Solaris, etc.).

      On each of those points there will be dozens, probably thousands, of slashdotters who agree, and probably even more who disagree (but on widely varying, mutually exclusive grounds). Welcome to the world, where there are many people, not all of whome tout the same party line (whatever you might be used to if you work for Steve Jobs).

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    319. Re:After a month of daily use... by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded up?

      They're not hard to find. You don't even need to live near an Apple store: I went to Best Buy and saw a whole table of iPads.

      small footnote here, not all slashdot users live in the US, the closest Best buy with a table full of ipads would be several thousand miles away for me..

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    320. Re:After a month of daily use... by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      So, which is it? We hate flash, until it is not there, then we hate Apple for removing such a pig ?

      Just because Flash is a bloated hog-tied gimp of a platform doesnt make it any less used in todays web. Yes we want flash to go away, but NO we do not suddenly be unable to use tons of websites. Apple doesnt need to remove flash, websites need to remove flash, and then when flash isnt used anymore in 'normal' websites, apple can drop support.

      We hate flash, but the key to removing flash is not outright killing flash support, but rather stop using it in websites, so in the end support isnt needed anymore

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    321. Re:After a month of daily use... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you misunderstood, my reply was concerning "learning through breaking" And yes, it is a "radically different philosophy." Giving kids things to break and expecting them to fix it is not mainstream. Our culture centers around healthcare, help centers, repair facilities, Genius Bars and Geek Squads. There are those who fix, and those who don't.

      Toys are thrown out when they break in most households. Give them a repair kid and see what happens may be an interesting endeavor for them.

      Your point concerning the development of childhood interest in subjects has many different variables. Traditionally, children learned the skills of their parents through shared work and play. My statement mostly concerns my own aversion towards "couch potato" living, whereby our interests are mostly confined to industrially produced culture.

      Many homes are two-working-parent endeavors and naturally gravitate towards a stasis of ideas. Good for you for going above and beyond and building your child's character and exposing her to the real world.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    322. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, you can read ./ on an iPad? I can't do that on the iPhone... well, ok, technically I can but it's a horrible experience. The comment slider does not respond to any "clicks" coming through the touch screen.

      And standing up on the train holding an iPad for an hour must be awful. I need to put the iPhone down after about 20 minutes reading with all the shaking (I can read for longer if I sit down though).

    323. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of the M$ addicts talking about they are safe from malware on their M$ PCs. If you claim you don't have malware on your M$ PC, you're either a liar, an M$ astroturfer, or someone is not connected to the internet. That's not just a flaw in the OS, it's also a flaw in the addicted M$ luser/astroturfer.

      --
      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
      Friends do assist M$ addicted friends in committing suicide.

    324. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      No need to ride in to protect the innocent here, Mr action hero.

      Isn't that exactly what you're doing, just from the opposite side of the argument? :/

    325. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you want to use a laptop to browse the internet if you have a desktop? Tiny screen, crappy speakers, no mouse... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    326. Re:After a month of daily use... by null+etc. · · Score: 1

      Excellent build quality, are you serious? I used one for five minutes, and left it with a permanent nick in the corner because I ever so slightly tapped it against my MacBook. It must be constructed out of the thinnest aluminum ever conceived. And don't even get me started on the lack of viewing angle of the display, which makes the motion based games all but unplayable.

    327. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm saddened to hear of your buyer's remorse. Obviously, you need to sell that iPad off to someone and be rid of it.

      Right?

    328. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's more like arguing that your freezer at home costs more, does less, and is less convenient than other home freezers: that every requirement you have for a freezer would have been filled better by buying a different model.

      You ignoring one absolutely crucial option, ease of use! Anyone can pick it up and use it, in 5 seconds, it's drop dead simple. If Apple is good at anything it's UI. Their UIs may be frustrating to the tech crowd because they arent as customizable as others, dont offer as many easy to access advanced settings... but that's not apple's target audience. Apple is very very good at making UIs that the average person can Just Use.

      A smartphone is an appliance too, but it fits in your pocket, doesn't tire your wrists out from holding it up, and costs less than an iPad. Even a netbook can be dumbed down into an appliance, if that's what you want.

      factor in service and the smartphone isnt less, and the key part about netbooks is "can be", people dont want "can be", they want "is".

      and honestly, in terms of price, unless you spend your days popping onto slickdeals and waiting for sales and the like, a netbook and the ipad cost about the same

      When the novelty wears off, what'll be left is a device that combines the disadvantages of a smartphone with the disadvantages of a laptop, and few of the advantages of either.

      That's your opinion, and one I happen to disagree with. The iPad is hitting a different niche than what normal laptops and smart phones are aimed at. It's just barely cheap enough to be an expensive impulse buy, easily and intuitively usable for most people, and very good for the kind of quick internet and email tasks people want to do on a bigger screen than their smartphone but dont want to go hop onto their comp for.

      And yes, it's also aesthetic enough to leave in your living room. If you don't think that's important....

      Look, when my parents got FiOS the woman doing the install came in, looked around, and asked where my father wanted the ONT (it's a largeish, wall mounted, beige box). I was home and I and my father both shrugged, pointed to a section of bare wall near the door, and said, "how about there?". After all, it's the connection that's important, and the quicker the box gets mounted to the wall the quicker it is to 25/25 internet!

      The tech took one look, turned back to my father, and goes "sir, are you married?". My father said yes, and the tech replied "then there is no way in hell your wife is going to want that there, you'll be sleeping on the couch tonight and I dont want that on my conscience... how about in the front closet?"

      Needless to say when my mother came home she was very happy to find the largeish beige telecom box *not* in plain view of the door.

      Geeks often dont care about aesthetics in our tech, but most people do.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    329. Re:After a month of daily use... by rinoid · · Score: 1

      > If there is anything the iPad isn't, it's a productivity tool. STFU fanboy.

      Really? And you would know this how?
      You curse me and call me a fanboy (first sign of a troll post) for citing a productivity app I use on my iPad?

      iSSH is a great app ... logging into remote servers to edit files and the such is what I do for a living, so yes, the iPad proves to be a very nice fucking productivity tool you tool.

    330. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      You ignoring one absolutely crucial option, ease of use! Anyone can pick it up and use it, in 5 seconds, it's drop dead simple.

      Heh. It's the year 2010, who doesn't know how to use a computer by now? Infants?

      But in any case, the iPad has no ease of use advantage over the less expensive, more convenient iPhone, or over competing tablets.

      factor in service and the smartphone isnt less

      It is if you're getting 3G service for the iPad too. If not, then you should be comparing it to something like the iPod Touch - the 64 GB iPod Touch is over $100 less than the 16 GB iPad.

      and honestly, in terms of price, unless you spend your days popping onto slickdeals and waiting for sales and the like, a netbook and the ipad cost about the same

      Have you not looked at prices lately? I went to bestbuy.com and with literally two clicks, I found 18 netbooks for under $300. The iPad starts at $500.

      It's just barely cheap enough to be an expensive impulse buy

      At $500? Maybe if you work on Wall Street.

      And yes, it's also aesthetic enough to leave in your living room.

      Take a look at some of those sub-$300 netbooks - they look just as slick. You don't have to buy Apple products to get attractive design anymore.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    331. Re:After a month of daily use... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      And a capacitive touchscreen that's (in)accurate to about 5 millimeters in each direction instead of a mouse... I'll stick with a trackpoint or my MX510, thank you very much.

    332. Re:After a month of daily use... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      How about "Flash sucks, but it's better than seeing little blue icons instead of videos..."

    333. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the iPad, however, you don't really have tabs. Instead you can back into some other screen where all your open pages appear as thumbnails. Not only is the transition of moving in and out a bit slow and aggravating, but there's no way to open a new page in the background. If you "Open in New Page", it automatically zooms you out, opens a new page, and zooms into that page.

      Several of the other web browsers for iPad fix this issue. I'm sure Apple will sell this as a feature in an upcoming iPad OS release to try to convince you to upgrade. My current iPad favorite browser is 'iCab', which sports this 'tab in the background' feature.

    334. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When will people like you understand that we get your argument, and we agree people buy stupid shit, we just find it stupid that people buy stupid, lesser things are higher price because of thing like the branding? We want a better world than the immediancy of the jock having the new Nike sneakers the morning they came out.

      If smaller size were the factor as you state so boldly, then there are cheaper, similarly sized items to the ipad. Sony has had their U series of laptops since like 2003 if not earlier, there are higher end netbooks, there are Fujitsu notebooks there are small, Korean phone makers have had small PDA/laptop devices for years.

      It sells because it's from Apple. And people don't know or care to look beyond that.

      The ipad sells because people think it's from Apple, it's the greatest thing. Not because they are competent. Apple has learned that branding and status symbols are more important than technological ends. I do not question that there are many, many people who will buy the ipad who have a need for an ipad--they want simplicity, something well built, wireless access, convenience, etc.

      But a million in the US in a month is because people want a status symbol, nothing more. Apple had developed a car maker's branding--there are people who see BMW and don't look beyond that, similar for Mercedes, Lexus, Audi, and Infiniti followers. There are those that look at all and more and cheaper options, and AFTER weighing those decisions make a choice. I don't think most people buying Apple's latest product have done this.

      People keep bringing up the ipod. The ipod STILL sucks. It's STILL lame compared to past and current mp3 players or even other formats. Yes, it sold like crazy. But that tells you more about the masses and the buyers of those products. The ipod didn't advance anything and to this day, still hasn't.

    335. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      You ignoring one absolutely crucial option, ease of use! Anyone can pick it up and use it, in 5 seconds, it's drop dead simple.

      Heh. It's the year 2010, who doesn't know how to use a computer by now? Infants?

      But in any case, the iPad has no ease of use advantage over the less expensive, more convenient iPhone, or over competing tablets.

      If any comment convinced me you're looking at it with blinders on, this is it. There are *lots* of people who don't know how to use a computer, and lots more that are *barely* computer literate. You, posting on /., are not a good yardstick. If you don't believe me, walk into a senior center, or a college helpdesk on move-in day, or, help me, a biology research lab. I've had plenty of users who don't know much about how to use their machines, and really don't want to.

      factor in service and the smartphone isnt less

      It is if you're getting 3G service for the iPad too. If not, then you should be comparing it to something like the iPod Touch - the 64 GB iPod Touch is over $100 less than the 16 GB iPad.

      Except the ipod touch has a *much* smaller (and non-IPS lower quality) screen, a slower processor, and less memory. The iPad is more powerful and if you're browsing the web for a long period of time much nicer. Look, I love my iPod touch, but it's a nice pocket computer/PDA, not a living-room web device. Why can't you understand that a larger, IPS screen alone is going to push the price up?

      and honestly, in terms of price, unless you spend your days popping onto slickdeals and waiting for sales and the like, a netbook and the ipad cost about the same

      Have you not looked at prices lately? I went to bestbuy.com and with literally two clicks, I found 18 netbooks for under $300. The iPad starts at $500.

      Fair enough, though the *really* cheap netbooks are slow, annoying to use on the web, ugly and un-aesthetic enough to not appeal nicely.

      It's just barely cheap enough to be an expensive impulse buy

      At $500? Maybe if you work on Wall Street.

      And yet people buy many more expensive things as impulse buys all the time. For that matter, an xbox or a ps3 near launch.....

      And yes, it's also aesthetic enough to leave in your living room.

      Take a look at some of those sub-$300 netbooks - they look just as slick. You don't have to buy Apple products to get attractive design anymore.

      I havent really seen many cheap laptops that rival the looks and design. sure, once you get above 500... Also, the screens alone often make them look poor in comparison, show me a netbook with an IPS display...

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    336. Re:After a month of daily use... by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      I'n going to go out on a limb and guess that that's a x86 netbook.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    337. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Look, I love my iPod touch, but it's a nice pocket computer/PDA, not a living-room web device. Why can't you understand that a larger, IPS screen alone is going to push the price up?

      I understand that a screen that size is expensive. I don't, however, see how the cost/benefit comparison works out in favor of buying an iPad for the average consumer.

      I'm sorry your iPod Touch isn't a satisfactory living-room web device. When I'm in the living room and I want to check something on the web, I reach for my Droid; I would've thought an iPod Touch would be equally good for that, but maybe not. I can understand how it'd be a nice luxury to have a bigger screen, but again, I have a hard time seeing how that's worth $500.

      Fair enough, though the *really* cheap netbooks are slow, annoying to use on the web, ugly and un-aesthetic enough to not appeal nicely. [...] I havent really seen many cheap laptops that rival the looks and design.

      Then you haven't looked lately. Go click twice on bestbuy.com, and you'll find good-looking netbooks for under $300.

      And yet people buy many more expensive things as impulse buys all the time.

      No, I don't think they do. Do you have an example in mind?

      For that matter, an xbox or a ps3 near launch.....

      Are you suggesting the people who spent $500+ on those consoles near their launch dates were impulse buyers? I think those were mainly hardcore gamers.

      Besides, an Xbox 360 or PS3 does something that other consoles don't. It adds functionality. The iPad, on the other hand, merely duplicates the functionality of a phone or laptop: at best, it's an expensive deluxe version of a device you already own.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    338. Re:After a month of daily use... by vilms · · Score: 0

      Where do I sign up? That sounds delightful!

      (got iPad, have hardly used laptop since, will hand in -admittedly tattered- geek card soon, I promise).

    339. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      So what if it's an adult version of the Gameboy? Was the Gameboy an utter failure because "HAY YOU CAN STAPLE A TV TO AN NES AND GET THE SAME THING DUMBASS"

    340. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      We want a better world than the immediancy of the jock having the new Nike sneakers the morning they came out.

      ...

      People keep bringing up the ipod. The ipod STILL sucks. It's STILL lame compared to past and current mp3 players or even other formats. Yes, it sold like crazy. But that tells you more about the masses and the buyers of those products. The ipod didn't advance anything and to this day, still hasn't.

      Wow.. so basically you are mad because people buy things they want and you think that you have some sort of higher knowledge on what they want? You really just went there and stated that "we" want a better world where people don't run out and buy things they want. Better yet, you even used a dumb jock analogy. It's like Slashdot has that facade of wanting absolute freedom and small (or no) government but what is actually meant is a world bending to their every whim. With posts like this, I don't even have to argue, I just have to quote.

      Also the iPod still sucks according to the billions of dollars it made Apple alone, and the empire it built Apple in conjunction with their rebirth. Why does Slashdot love the free market so much? Why? I honestly really have seriously absolutely no fucking clue. It seems that at every turn a Slashdotter wants to just screech for their mommy to make the world work their way. Seriously, a ramble against jocks and Nikes when talking about a dream world in which everyone bends to their every whim? Are you gonna shoot up your school next or something? BTW those girls aren't any more likely to take you to prom because you are too edgy for an iPod.

    341. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      It is a sad, disturbing trend I am seeing where anyone in favor of an Apple product in a way that fights back the Slashdot "fuck Apple" sheeple gets modded troll. Truly, Slashdot is a pathetic wasteland. I had excellent karma and 15 mod points every other day until I started calling people out on being completely fucking ignorant. The parent is not a troll in any way shape or form.

    342. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Further more, I never post AC. I take my hits like a man.

    343. Re:After a month of daily use... by timepilot · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm a little late getting back on this, but a bt keyboard means now you've got to carry around a keyboard AND an iPad. I use a netbook as a VNC client and while it makes an abysmal ebook reader, it is just awesome at VNC and everything else you need a keyboard for.

      To top things off, the bt keyboard that apple peddles for use with the iPad is made of aluminum and will scratch the crap out of the iPad if you jam them in a backpack together. So now you need the iPad, keyboard and a sleeve for at least one of them.

      I want to be convinced that the iPad is swell because I'd like a good excuse to get one, but heck if I can see a compelling case if I'm already well served by a good phone and a netbook.

    344. Re:After a month of daily use... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm a little late getting back on this, but a bt keyboard means now you've got to carry around a keyboard AND an iPad. I use a netbook as a VNC client and while it makes an abysmal ebook reader, it is just awesome at VNC and everything else you need a keyboard for.

      If you don't want to use the on-screen keyboard, borrow any BT keyboard on site.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    345. Re:After a month of daily use... by timepilot · · Score: 1

      To me, the point of having something super portable is that "on site" means on a train, in a car, at a soccer game, at the library.

      No spare bt keyboards just hanging about there.

      And the on-screen keyboard just does not cut it in a pinch. Try to fire up vi or emacs to edit an apache config on an iPad or iPhone using the on-screen keyboard. Ugh.

      Okay, I guess that's all I have to say about that.

  3. It's not the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Netbooks just suck. I have a nice one (HP2140) and I hate using it.

    1. Re:It's not the iPad by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Netbooks just suck. I have a nice one (HP2140) and I hate using it.

      I have three netbooks, and I like using two of them. Amusingly one is from Gateway, but I believe it's also an Everex and maybe someone else sells it too. The other is from Asus. I've had a couple HP notebooks, they were very expensive, and very lame. I wouldn't touch an HP netbook with oven mitts wrapped in condoms.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:It's not the iPad by jon3k · · Score: 1

      I have the same laptop and have used an iPad and to be honest, it depends on what I'm doing. If I'm using it in the datacenter to console into a router I'm going for the netbook. But if I want to read a PDF or browse the web, no question, I'm going for the iPad.

  4. Not a fan of flashless tablets. by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    Every decent guy needs a one-handed tablet they can bring to bed with themselves.

    1. Re:Not a fan of flashless tablets. by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Funny

      Decent? One-handed... in bed... with themselves? Adult film producer, you are just cramming too much innuendo into one slashdot post.

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    2. Re:Not a fan of flashless tablets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until said guy goes to redtube to find.. no flash support.

  5. hyperbole much? by thomasdz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Geesh... "destroyed"? "fell off a cliff"?
    no bias in this article

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    1. Re:hyperbole much? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My netbook fell off a cliff and really was destroyed, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:hyperbole much? by Scyth3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's hard-hitting Glenn Beck-style news. 100% "truth".

    3. Re:hyperbole much? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      My netbook fell off a cliff and really was destroyed, you insensitive clod!

      And the iPad has no alibi, I notice. Hmmm...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:hyperbole much? by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      *We report* on how the awesome new Ipad is decimating the very existence of the Netbook, then defecating on its already stinking corpse. *You Decide* how long it will take you to open your eyes to the best computing device on earth, and then open your checkbook to the tune of 800 bucks!

      Fair.And.Balanced.

      Hey, look out! There's something behind you!

    5. Re:hyperbole much? by bhartman34 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only is it incredibly biased, but it offers nothing in the way of actual evidence that would persuade someone who'd advanced past third grade.

      Think about it for a second: Only 44% of the people who bought iPads who were surveyed said that they did so instead of buying a netbook. How many people bought iPads, as compared to those who bought netbooks?

      The other thing that's astonishing to me is that someone who writes a market research report could be so piss-poor at reading a graph. Sales of netbooks actually went down most in October/November 2009, well before the January announcement of the iPad. I'm kind of astonished that the author of the Fortune article could be that stupid.

    6. Re:hyperbole much? by JeffSpudrinski · · Score: 1

      I purchased a netbook last week and have absolutely no regrets. It was perfect for what I wanted. Small, compact, ability to install run whatever app I want (I wanted to run a number of freeware utilities such as inSSIDer and AngryIP).

      While the iPad is nice (yes...I've tried it), it just wasn't good for what I wanted to do.

      Also...the more I use Win7, the better I like it. From a network admin standpoint, it gave me a few initial headaches, but after I got those ironed out, it's been good and stable.

      Just my $0.02

      -JJS

    7. Re:hyperbole much? by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 1

      From 640% to 0% YoY growth in 9 months? Doesn't get much more "destroyed" than that.

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    8. Re:hyperbole much? by WesternActor · · Score: 1

      The really funny part is that the story was on CNN.

      --

      --Matthew
      "If the lights of Broadway blind me, I won't mind..."
    9. Re:hyperbole much? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We’re comparing growth in sales. Sales were 641% higher in July of ’09 than they were in July of ’08. Sales were still 5% higher in April of ’10 than they’d been in April of ’09.

      If you’d just look at the DOW it’s pretty easy to see why this isn’t really that spectacular. In July of ’08 the market was teetering at the brink of a precipitous fall. In April of ’09 things were just starting to recover.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:hyperbole much? by maxume · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sales did not go down in October/November. The growth rate versus 2008 sales for that month showed a lower growth rate than for the previous period over 2008.

      So while the year over year growth jumps around quite a lot, the year over year sales actually increased for each month shown on the graph. They increased very little in April. Perhaps because of the iPad, but between the level of noise that seems to be present in that graph and a whole host of other factors (the economy seemed to get better last summer, so people that put off purchases probably showed up, and things like Christmas), that's a pretty aggressive thing to conclude.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:hyperbole much? by thomasdz · · Score: 1

      From 640% to 0% YoY growth in 9 months? Doesn't get much more "destroyed" than that.

      Measuring my increase in height over the decades:
      1960s: 400% increase
      1970s: 50% increase
      1980s: 0% increase

      My gawd! Something horrible must have happened to me in the 1980s to completely DESTROY my increase in height after previous decades average of +200%. Maybe I fell off a cliff or something.

      --
      Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    12. Re:hyperbole much? by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of an XKCD:

      http://xkcd.com/125/

    13. Re:hyperbole much? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Sales did not go down in October/November. The growth rate versus 2008 sales for that month showed a lower growth rate than for the previous period over 2008.

      Good point. I sit corrected on that. But taht just makes the conclusion drawn by the article worse, I think.

    14. Re:hyperbole much? by maxume · · Score: 2

      I was more enjoying the irony than trying to defend the article.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not stupidity if they knowingly mislead you. People don't like to piss off Apple for some reason. Even Ellen apologized recently for an iphone spoof commercial. It wasn't even that funny.

    16. Re:hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an app for that.

    17. Re:hyperbole much? by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      The conclusion is obvious... The iPad used Steve's trademarked reality distortion field to travel back in time to August and destroy netbook sales.

    18. Re:hyperbole much? by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Netbook sales tend to go up around September, spike at December (Christmas), and then decline again until the next September. Most of this is due to people who use it for school (a useful purpose) rather than ones who rush out to buy a netbook just because it's brand-new.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    19. Re:hyperbole much? by greengrass · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of astonished that the author of the Fortune article could be that stupid.

      Read any articles by Daniel Lyons lately?

      --
      The MS "no sue/patent deal" with Novell/Xandros is like the Pope blessing a Jewish wedding
    20. Re:hyperbole much? by fermion · · Score: 1
      I probably would have bought a netbook if the iPad was not available, but I probably would not have stated such on a survey. It would have been an impulse purchase on woot or something. I might have bought the sony reader for $200. So what does the 44% mean? 440,000 people who would have bought a netbook or a laptop are not going to. What this also means is that tens of thousands of people who were vaguely looking for something like this are not going to choose the netbook solution.

      What this really means is that most entities in the market cannot design what people really want. The kindle is a good machine, but I can imagine why I need a keyboard taking valuable reading space. Furthermore, Amazon is so interested in selling books, that they spent no time figuring our how to monetize the method that most people consume content, which is online. I have subscriptions to all the journals I want, and can read them online. However, it was never clear if I could read them on a kindle. The kindle was designed to promote the Amazon philosophy, not to give users the experience they need. This is a common malady. Just look at how many websites are design based on corporate org structure, not making information available to customers.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    21. Re:hyperbole much? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Sales of netbooks actually went down most in October/November 2009

      <Morbo> STATISTICS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY</Morbo>.

      Read again: the year-on-year growth in sales "went down". Sales of netbooks are still growing, even on top of the massive rise in early 2009, despite the "magical" iPad.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    22. Re:hyperbole much? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      So what does the 44% mean? 440,000 people who would have bought a netbook or a laptop are not going to. What this also means is that tens of thousands of people who were vaguely looking for something like this are not going to choose the netbook solution.

      Does anyone know how many netbooks were sold since the iPad was announced? What percentage of netbook sales does that 440,000 represent?

      I don't think you can draw any conclusion from the people not surveyed. The only people you can assume aren't going to buy netbooks now that the iPad has been released are those people who wanted Web browsing and e-book reading without a keyboard. It sounds like the kind of demographic that's going to hurt smartphone sales more than netbook sales.

    23. Re:hyperbole much? by plawsy · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of astonished that the author of the Fortune article could be that stupid.

      Why? What in what passes for modern journalism would cause you to be astonished?

    24. Re:hyperbole much? by BearRanger · · Score: 1

      So you're saying the "magic" is really the Higgs boson? Something so abhorrent to nature it moves backwards in time to prevent its own discovery. Yeah, that pretty much sums up the netbook exactly...

    25. Re:hyperbole much? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Um...good point. :)

    26. Re:hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How many people bought iPads, as compared to those who bought netbooks? "

      Well, how many people bought Model T's in the first three months after Ford announced them? And how many people bought horses in those three months? Just think of all the horseshit we'll be avoiding as netbook sales decline more and more over time. It'll be a welcome relief.

    27. Re:hyperbole much? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      It unusually sensational for a financial article. Its bias, however, is par for the course.

      Remember the "financial analysts" talking about how great the stock market is all the way until the minute before it crashed? These articles are written by shepards catering to sheep. They'll always say there is no big bad wolf, because that's what sheep like to hear.

      The real analysts are working for the financial companies, and their analyses are completely secret. Why do you think Goldman was secretly shorting mortgage-backed securities while still selling them as highly rated? It's because if Goldman stopped doing the latter, they'd lose their advantage in the former. So they have to maintain the facade, in order that they can reap all the benefits.

      Financial articles and analyses are all pretty much based on this idea. Not only does nobody want to read naysayers and doom and gloom sotries, but it's more advantageous for the parent companies providing these analyses to skew the truth towards as positive a light as possible.

      I'm not necessarily questioning the separation between church and state in Fortune, but the overall layman perception of the iPad is that it is a good thing for the iPad to be doing well, and that's the mentality articles about the iPad will cater to.

      We who are engineers and scientists though, know better (or should) than to look at analysis without looking at the data. Not only that, but as we're a little more cynical than most, we also tend to wonder what's not being said. And in this case, it's pretty obvious the author is grasping at straws, and that the information in the article does not provide any usable indication.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    28. Re:hyperbole much? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Great. If that drives down netbook prices I'm all for it.

    29. Re:hyperbole much? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      The other thing that's astonishing to me is that someone who writes a market research report could be so piss-poor at reading a graph.

      To me, it seems far more likely that the author wants to present a particular narrative, rather than that he's honestly reporting misunderstood statistics. Keep in mind that all journalism is the work of humans, who inevitably bring their biases into play, no matter how hard they try to be objective and neutral.

      It's entirely possible that they misunderstood the statistics, or it's possible that they know that this article will stir shit up and get them more pageviews (and ad revenue) than it might otherwise.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  6. Idiot tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of people buy the Sun/Mirror newspapers in the UK or watch Fox News in the USA. So some people decide they want an iPad too, big deal.

    1. Re:Idiot tax by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah, the "I was wrong but I'm actually still right" tactic. An interesting gambit.

    2. Re:Idiot tax by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever lost money by betting on the stupidity of the general public.

    3. Re:Idiot tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the "I was wrong but I'm actually still right" tactic. An interesting gambit.

      On Slashdot, you are as "right" as your comment score regardless of what you actually say or mean.

    4. Re:Idiot tax by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Ah, the "I was wrong but I'm actually still right" tactic. An interesting gambit.

      Ah yes, frequently employed by the religious. Usually followed by "I'll pray for you."

      yes, yes, I know, off topic...

    5. Re:Idiot tax by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      Oh so why is it the iPad taking the wind?

      I'm doing so much more with my Android phone now, and feel I don't have need for a "laptop" anymore for most things. For real work, I have my workstation.

      So he can still be right without the gambit ;)

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    6. Re:Idiot tax by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Without gambit? What is this the X-Men movies?

  7. I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

    in fact, a dell mini10v JUST so that I could run hackintosh sw on it. 100% compat (once you have a mac to sysgen your new mac, that is).

    it has a keyboard. it can run any os. I can upgrade things. it has ports!

    do I want an ipad? no. not at the current price, features and, well, its almost all that is WRONG with apple these days.

    only apple guys are buying the ipad. that's still a very tiny minority. netbooks are still firmly in the sales channels and will be even though apple tries to change our view of reality with their paid-for ads and fake grass-roots posts.

    a walled garden can never replace a notebook. we all know that!

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I like reading steadfast denial expressed in such an obtuse and spergy way that poster actually truly believes that his opinions and life choices trump the realities expressed in TFA. It's really adorable :3

    2. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      in fact, a dell mini10v JUST so that I could run hackintosh sw on it. 100% compat (once you have a mac to sysgen your new mac, that is).

      it has a keyboard. it can run any os. I can upgrade things. it has ports!

      do I want an ipad? no. not at the current price, features and, well, its almost all that is WRONG with apple these days.

      only apple guys are buying the ipad. that's still a very tiny minority. netbooks are still firmly in the sales channels and will be even though apple tries to change our view of reality with their paid-for ads and fake grass-roots posts.

      a walled garden can never replace a notebook. we all know that!

      So, you detest the Apple experience, that you just bought a netbook to recreate? Um you might want to see a therapist.

    3. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone actually SEEN an Ipad yet? I certainly haven't. But then again I live in Canada.

    4. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Take an iphone and make it a lot bigger.

      Keep the same iTunes setup, the same apps and the appstore and the same Safari Mobile browser with all of it's warts and limitations.

      Some people see/hear "oversized ipod" and are fine with that.

      The Apple fanboys seem to get offended by that characterization for some reason.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > So, you detest the Apple experience, that you just bought a netbook to recreate? Um you might want to see a therapist.

      The guy likes MACINTOSH.

      Macintosh != ipod.

      Are you a total clueless idiot or something?

      A guy can install a browser of his choosing on MacOS.
      A guy can install a copy of Flash on MacOS.
      A guy can play something besides Quicktime files in a subset of h264 on MacOS.
      A guy can run a remote desktop server on MacOS.
      A guy can print on MacOS.
      A guy can share and be shared on a network with MacOS.
      A guy can manage his own list of owned applications on MacOS.

      A fresh copy of iTunes wanting to wipe your ipod/iphone gets old after awhile.

      A Plex tablet would be wicked cool.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      So, you detest the Apple experience, that you just bought a netbook to recreate? Um you might want to see a therapist.

      He doesn't want the "Apple experience;" he wants Mac OS X -- which, not coincidentally, is missing from the iPad.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I don't actually care what it is I just think it's funny that once again Slashdot has proven how inept they are at speculation due to their heavy biases and nerdrage clouding their view of reality. Seriously, let's say the iPad was stock and you could have gotten that stock. Slashdot would have said "fuck that shit" and as the stock's value proceeded to rise, the Slashdotters would still act like they made the right choice by saying "well it _shouldn't_ be doing that well so it doesn't count".

    8. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by tak+amalak · · Score: 1

      Well stock up on netbooks. I have a feeling they will be a passing memory in a few years.

      --
      Don't lead me into temptation... I can find it myself.
    9. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's audience has a high number of geeks in it. Geeks are stereotypically terrible at estimating how the general public thinks about technology. Most geeks prefer flexibility to something which "just works"--and most people (geeks included) project their own desires on the general population. As a species, we tend to think that faceless others are like us until proven wrong.

      Of course, the derisiveness after the fact is just delusional. Or perhaps it's a defense mechanism stemming from being so different from so many people (those people being the 1million+ who want an iPad.)

    10. Re:I bought my 2nd netbook just a week ago by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      not mine... maybe you're all using it wrong.

  8. Another explanation by Yossarian45793 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or maybe netbook sales are cratering because instead of delivering quality models with high performance and low power packed into a lightweight enclosure, companies like Dell have axed all but the most profitable models, and replaced SSDs with magnetic disks and raised prices to the maximum they can squeeze out of customers. Netbook selection is terrible now compared to what it was a year ago. Last year there were many models and there was a price war, now there are a few models and they're just crappy low-end notebooks.

    1. Re:Another explanation by puto · · Score: 1

      Really, I just bought a dell Vosotro Laptop with a Mini thrown in. Total cost with shipping for both items was 600 bucks.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    2. Re:Another explanation by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      Notice, too, that your OS options are ancient XP Home or the horrible under-performer Windows 7 Starter. Neither are a good OS for a netbook. What is needed is for the netbook to try to be more, or perhaps less, than a full notebook. Notice also how much extra a tablet/touch screen model adds to the price.

    3. Re:Another explanation by bkpark · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. Asus's Eee line (the original netbook, unless you count OLPC whose design has been around for a while before Eee came out) is still designed and sold along the same line: cheap ($350 for most models), small, and long battery life. Given that this is, what, third year since first Eee came out, perhaps you can blame lack of innovation for drop in netbook sales, but I wouldn't blame manufacturers of losing their ways.

      I personally blame U.S. climbing out of recession. Someone I personally know was looking for a small laptop recently and instead of a cheap netbook, he decided on a full-fledged notebook (same size, but with dual-core processors and more RAM, I think). But maybe the actual data doesn't support this hunch ... (esp. if notebook sales are more or less the same).

    4. Re:Another explanation by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      I am running Windows 7 Professional on an Acer Aspire One, and it runs beautifully. No under-performing here at all. Atom CPU, 160GB HDD, 1366x768 display.

      Bought it last year for something like $320 including the 2GB RAM upgrade. (the 6-cell battery too, good for about 5 hours).

      Replaced the operating system for another $30 (thank you Microsoft for your awesome student discounts).

      Have about 10X the functionality of an iPad... and the only thing I had to sacrifice was less than 1lb of extra weight, and 1/2 inch of extra thickness.

      Interestingly, that model is no longer available, and I don't think there's a replacement at that price point.

    5. Re:Another explanation by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I've been questioning the whole "netbook" classification lately. What set netbooks apart form notebooks was that they sacrificed a lot of functionality to make the cheapest, lightest, smallest thing capable of browsing the Internet (on a screen big enough that you didn't have to zoom in/out the way cell phones do). Now they're generally cheap ultraportable laptops.

      Which is fine. Whatever. But "netbook" just seems like a marketing term now. They're small laptops made as cheaply as possible, but you can't call them tiny cheap laptops.

    6. Re:Another explanation by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      In this case, less is more. If you try to be just a downsized laptop, then people are going to expect your device to be able to do everything a regular laptop can, with a similar level of performance. What Apple has done, and what netbooks need to do, is stop pretending that they can do everything a regular laptop does. They need to say, we might not be able to do everything, but those things we can do, we do them amazingly well.

    7. Re:Another explanation by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I can't believe the selection is less and SSDs are gone. This is so weird.

    8. Re:Another explanation by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      The things you say about selection and price don't match what I see. There are a crap-ton of Atom N270-based netbooks. There's always one model or another on sale for well under $300. As long as you don't plan on running OSX, it really doesn't matter which model you buy because the specs are nearly identical. N270 CPU, GMA950 GPU, B/G wireless, 10/100 wired, SD/MS slot, 3 USB ports, VGA and/or DVI/HDMI port, 3 USB ports. I just threw out an ad from a company selling a refurb for $199 and new for $230. It doesn't matter if there are two brands or a dozen. It's the same basic device.

      There are a few oddballs out there like the Sony P series and Acer's C2S-based 11.6", some old-school Asus models and some Everex/Sylvania/whatever VIA-based systems from the pre-Atom days but the configuration I described is the standard, commodity netbook. And there are a ton of them.

      And I think this is one of the things contributing to the decline in sales. Everyone who needs or wants one has one. It's cheap so people don't have to save up for a year or two to obtain one. And there's no reason to replace it because nothing's changed since the Atoms first hit the market. Same processor, same graphics, same screen, same everything.

    9. Re:Another explanation by geekd · · Score: 1

      You prove his point.

      he said "your OS options are ancient XP Home or the horrible under-performer Windows 7 Starter."

      you said "I am running Windows 7 Professional on an Acer Aspire One, and it runs beautifully. No under-performing here at all."

      but he was referring to Windows 7 Starter as a under-performer, not Professional.

      So then I thought you were making the point that Windows 7 Professional WAS available, not just XP or 7 Starter, but then you said "that model is no longer available"

      So you're just agreeing with him then?

    10. Re:Another explanation by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      Not weird - their success scared Intel, Dell and Microsoft shitless so they have been slowly killing off any model that sells for $300 or less.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    11. Re:Another explanation by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      And it doesn't have to be as simple as "more or less". It could simply be difference. I think a netbook with a touch screen and the ability to fold tablet style, paired with a novel UI and a more streamlined, lower profile OS, could still do almost as much as a regular laptop. Almost. And most of what it does that is the same would be doable just as easily. At present, the netbook does everything more slowly and pathetically than it's bigger brother because it isn't replicating the functions appropriately to the reduced system and a fitting environment, it's simply doing the same functions with punier hardware.

    12. Re:Another explanation by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Right, but most of them are based on pretty off-the-shelf parts, and Linux is a free upgrade from either XP or SevenStarter. :)

      Ubuntu Netbook Remix is pretty cool, and quite good at netbookery.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    13. Re:Another explanation by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      I just want to thank you for coining the term "netbookery". It is an awesome, and truly worth, word, by sound and mouth feel alone.

    14. Re:Another explanation by natehoy · · Score: 1

      What sets netbooks apart from laptops is that you sacrifice speed and screen size for battery life and portability. "Cheap" (as in shitty construction from shitty parts) is found in all form factors, and you tend to get what you pay for. For the same build quality, you'll tend to get netbooks cheaper than laptops primarily because the netbook requires fewer components, uses a slower processor, and has a smaller screen. But you can still find good quality netbooks just as easily as you can find crappy laptops, and vice versa.

      "Netbook" may be a bullshit term, but it's here, and it accurately describes a niche of products. They used to be called "ultraportables" or "subnotebooks" when they first came out in the 90's, and there's still so much overlap between the "netbook" niche and the "subnotebook" niche to make any distinction pretty much meaningless. The basic theory is that a netbook will tend to sacrifice even more power than a subnotebook because it's designed to connect to servers to do most of the heavy lifting, and it really shouldn't have a lot of storage, but most have plenty of power to run local apps and tons of storage.

      The build quality of my wife's Asus eee is quite good. It's plastic, of course, but it feels like durable stuff. It gets around 8 hours of real-life-real-use battery, it weighs almost nothing, and there are very few things it does noticeably slower than our dual-core 3GHZ desktop beast.

      Yes, they've moved from a nice low-power SSD back to a spinning drive to save a few bucks, which was a bit disappointing, but it's still a solid little bugger, doesn't generate a lot of heat, and it still lasts all day with no need for a recharge. It's no replacement for a desktop or even a laptop, but it's not meant to be. It fills that niche between "portable as a cell phone" and "powerful as a laptop" quite nicely, and for a lot of people it's all the computer they really need on a day-in-day-out basis, and can be carried around a hell of a lot easier, and you're not constantly looking for a power plug when you do carry it.

      I didn't buy it because it was cheaper than a laptop, I bought it because it is more portable and holds a charge longer, and because any laptop on the market today is to big, too clumsy, runs out of power too fast, heats up too much, and has more power than you need for what my wife wanted it for - casual surfing, maintaining a few HTML websites, and keeping up with Facebook.

      "Too much of a good thing is not a good thing".

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    15. Re:Another explanation by natehoy · · Score: 1

      You're quite welcome. I hereby release the term under Creative Commons. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    16. Re:Another explanation by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      There are still a few good ones out there, like this one: www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  9. welp. by hamburger+lady · · Score: 5, Funny

    the /. "it'll never sell, it's just a giant itouch' crowd really knocked this one outta the park.

    what can i say? when you're right 48 of the time, you're wrong 52 percent of the time.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    1. Re:welp. by Zironic · · Score: 1

      Has anyone figured out what it's good for yet?

    2. Re:welp. by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the /. crowd said something more along the lines of, "It's a piece of crap, but every yuppie retard will still buy one."

      Seems a little more in-line with reality.

    3. Re:welp. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Has anyone figured out what it's good for yet?

      Apple's profits?

      Clearly, a lot of people want one -- so either they have no idea of what they'll use it for, or it fills a niche that nobody realized was there.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:welp. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, most of the /. crowd is formed of IT admins, programmers, and engineers, whose environment is saturated with computers and probably do not need a device that has less functionality than the one they sit in front of all day long. For the basic end-user, it's a nifty device. You're just getting a biased opinion here.

    5. Re:welp. by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      untold millions added to apple's bottom line, i figure.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    6. Re:welp. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Funny

      "It's a piece of crap, but every yuppie retard will still buy one."

        In other news, Slashdot posters also declared with authority that "dating supermodels is a real pain in the ass, they are too high-maintenance" and "being rich doesn't make you happy!"

    7. Re:welp. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You can count me out of that crowd. I am in the crowd that said, "This horribly locked down and restricted computer will probably sell extremely well because of Apple's amazing abilities to market products and the average consumers lack of information on technical matters."

      What do you know, my prediction was spot on.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    8. Re:welp. by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      the /. "it'll never sell, it's just a giant itouch' crowd really knocked this one outta the park.

      what can i say? when you're right 48 of the time, you're wrong 52 percent of the time.

      Hell, that's better than average, right !? Oh wait...

    9. Re:welp. by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone figured out what it's good for yet?

      Apple's profits?

      That has yet to be seen. Depending on the manufacturing cost of the iPad, it could be bad for profits.

    10. Re:welp. by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you've been drinking some of that delicious Apple flavored Hater-aid. I went into the apple store the other day and tried it out. It is really nice and is a pretty neat little gadget for just browsing the web while you're hanging out on the couch. Still too high a price for my tastes, and knowing apple it won't ever come down. Still, a "piece of crap" it is not.

    11. Re:welp. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      However, iDevices are designed to be a continuing revenue stream for Apple, through app and music sales.

    12. Re:welp. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      It is just a giant iPod Touch.

      I, however, never had any doubts that it would sell.

      I am perfectly aware of just how stupid most people are.

    13. Re:welp. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "it's worthless, mother, tell them it's worthless!" sulked Slashdot user Zironic. "There, there honey," his mother purred. "It's going to be alright. The iPad is worthless." In her heart, however, she knew that she was lying to him. As Zironic drifted off into sleep, she shed a tear of sadness for her sulking manchild. She knew that one day he would have to face the truth: he had no idea what he was talking about and everyone hated him.

    14. Re:welp. by ashidosan · · Score: 1

      No 4G, less space than a netbook. Runs proprietary app store. Lame.

    15. Re:welp. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      That has yet to be seen. Depending on the manufacturing cost of the iPad, it could be bad for profits.

      They sold 1 million. In 28 days. They can't make enough to sell one to everyone who would happily plunk down money for it.

      Unless they were complete idiots and sold it at a loss, I highly doubt it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    16. Re:welp. by sweatyboatman · · Score: 1

      "biased opinion" is redundant

      --
      It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    17. Re:welp. by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Apple has the market pegged better than anybody.. except, possibly, maybe Sony... watch for their next gadget... soon to be hyped on the front page here...

      I liked netbooks because it was the last place I could get XP..

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    18. Re:welp. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What technical knowledge do they lack? They don't need any. That's why they like Apple. That's why they like the iPad. Do you think you can gallop into the Apple store on a brilliant white steed and declaritively compare spec sheets and the consumer will be blinded by your glory and understand the error of their ways?

    19. Re:welp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everyone who doesn't agree with me is stupid. It couldn't possibly be that I was wrong about it being useful."

    20. Re:welp. by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      You just love insulting people, don't you. I would think someone as refined as yourself would not stoop to slapping everyone that bought an iPad as being a "yuppie retard."

      You like your gadgets, I like mine... there's no need to insult each other.

    21. Re:welp. by uprise78 · · Score: 1

      So....if people don't share your exact opinions, wants and needs they become stupid? Sounds like you may need a few minutes in front of a mirror my friend.

    22. Re:welp. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      Yes, well I meant to imply that the opinion(s) of slashdot do not necessarily reflect general opinion(s). For the sake of clarity, it is much easier to say that the sample of opinions here are biased (read distinct) from the global population of opinions, rather than saying you are getting an opinion. I should have used it in the plural form to imply that I was thinking of populations of opinions and not one from a single entity.

    23. Re:welp. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "biased opinion" is redundant

      No, it's not. I'll give you an example: I am a Nintendo fanboy. So if Nintendo announces a new a gimmick I'll be the first to tell you why it's great. If that same gimmick was added to a Sony system, I'd be the first to tell you why it's stupid and nobody'd want it. That's called 'biased opinon'. Whereas plain old 'opinion' would be a candid "here's what I think" and 'informed opinion' would be if you actually spent time with the products you're discussing and understand the ins and outs of each one.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    24. Re:welp. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      No, no - the slashdot crowd said "it will tank, like the Apple TV, no one will buy one.

      Now that it has sold at twice the rate of the iPhone at launch, slashdot will attempt to retcon their predictions of failure into statements like yours.

      And for the record, I have not bought one - I can't see a personal need for one at the moment since I do most of my browsing and TV watching from my iMac.

      I think there is an enormous chip on many people here about a device (and company as a whole) who do things differently to the way prescribed by the tech elite crowd who "know how things should be done" and despite this difference still being able to successfully sell their products. The only way to soothe their hurt pride is to declare that "only retards and yuppies" are buying those products because "they have clearly been conned by slick marketing".

      Newsflash: not everyone has the same set of criteria when making purchasing decisions. But then, you already knew that.

      You need to add "it's a piece of crap in [your] opinion" to be in line with reality.

    25. Re:welp. by hansede · · Score: 1

      Has anyone figured out what it's good for yet?

      It very nicely fills a gap in hand-held casual gaming appliances.

    26. Re:welp. by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      You're mixing up your dependent and independent variables.

    27. Re:welp. by LordBmore · · Score: 1

      Apple IPad Components May Cost as Little as $260, ISuppli Says

      Certainly the linked article isn't definitive proof, but at this point I think it is safe to say that the iPad isn't going to be bad for Apple's profits.

    28. Re:welp. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      if people don't share your exact opinions, wants and needs they become stupid?

      Right, because that is implied fucking ANYwhere in my post.

      Way to read into things what you want to see.

    29. Re:welp. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you tried to date a supermodel you would probably shoot yourself.

      The cult loves to make analogies with luxury items they will never even test drive.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    30. Re:welp. by Zironic · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I don't know much about hand held gaming devices since I havn't had one since the original gameboy. However intuitively I'd guess you're talking about it being a more casual gaming platform? Isn't it then rather counter-intuitive that it doesn't support flash, the medium which most commonly used timewasting games are made for?

    31. Re:welp. by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why it's so important to you to reshape reality to your whims, but...

      Who is this ubiquitous "slashdot crowd," then? I would say my statements contribute to the "slashdot consensus," as much as any other nerd's, and I never said what you're saying I said. You're basically insisting that we think this thing that we don't think, and I'm not sure I understand why. No one's "retconning" anything. I don't have any sense of pride revolving around whether or not Apple does well, or Dell or Microsoft who whoever you happen to be opposed to, and therefore affiliate me with, succeeding.

      Stop being a fanboy.

    32. Re:welp. by Zironic · · Score: 1

      It's not that I rage against it. However I can't quite see why I'd want one and noone that likes it has been able to explain what it's good for either, which leaves me confused.

    33. Re:welp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so what did you mean then when you posted "I am perfectly aware of just how stupid most people are."?

    34. Re:welp. by ravenscar · · Score: 1

      Does one million sales = success? Maybe it does, but I'm not so sure. I think we will need to see strong sales for several months before we can declare the ipad more than a toy for members of the early adoption crowd.

      For sake of comparison, over 15 million Windows Mobile handsets were sold in 2010 (http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1306513). That's over one million handsets per month yet we all consider WinMo 6.5 a dead OS.

      I know that handsets and tablets are apples and oranges, and that the ipad is performing well in a market that is far smaller than the smartphone market. Still, I think the comparison shows that one million devices isn't all that many in the scheme of things.

    35. Re:welp. by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Other way around. Music and app sales are there to entice people to buy iPhones, iPads and iPods. Look at Apple's financial statements. They really only do slightly better than even on the iTunes store.

    36. Re:welp. by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The slashdot crowd has been the vocal bunch that come out in every Apple article and moan and moan about how terrible all their products are, rather than simply skipping past.

      Bonus points for "not another apple article" comments. You think the scroll wheel or page down key had never been invented.

      Just look back over the early articles leading up to the launch - the overwhelming consensus was that it would tank, with some saying "it'll be great" some saying "who knows?" and some saying "only retards will buy one".

      Now that it's flying off the shelves faster than the iPhone those opinions have all gone, to be replaced with "what is it for?" and "only yuppies are buying them".

      I don't care one way or the other whether it succeeds, but a large portion of people here just can't leave it alone - it's not enough to just not buy one, it somehow must be killed with fire.

    37. Re:welp. by hansede · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I don't know much about hand held gaming devices since I havn't had one since the original gameboy. However intuitively I'd guess you're talking about it being a more casual gaming platform? Isn't it then rather counter-intuitive that it doesn't support flash, the medium which most commonly used timewasting games are made for?

      That doesn't change the fact that it is the -ONLY- casual hand-held gaming device in its class. Flash or no Flash, it's catering to a huge audience and filling their needs better than any similar device. If another similar device comes along that does implement Flash, the iPad will have a contender, but since that is not yet the case . . .

    38. Re:welp. by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you've been drinking some of that delicious Apple flavored Hater-aid. I went into the apple store the other day and tried it out. It is really nice and is a pretty neat little gadget for just browsing the web while you're hanging out on the couch.

      Funny, it sounds like you've been drinking some of Steve's own kool-aid.

      I went to Best Buy a week ago and tried one out myself. It was mediocre: less portable than a phone, less useful than a netbook. The browser didn't work on JavaScript-heavy sites that work in the Android browser. It's too heavy to comfortably hold up for any length of time, so you're stuck leaving it on a surface or propping it up against something.

      Is it a piece of crap? Probably not. I mean, it's a well-engineered device for what it is... it's just engineered to be something pointless. The term I'd use is "white elephant": it's unique, expensive, and disappointing once the novelty wears off.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    39. Re:welp. by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      Don't even reply to that guy, he's the most rabid fanboy I've ever seen.

    40. Re:welp. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe it was more along the lines of...

      "it will tank, like the Apple TV, no one will buy one because you can't run SETI@home, have16 xterms open, play Quake 3 through the ASCII version of SVGAlib, use XCode and Visual Studio and watch movies using VLC all at the same time as you're simultaneously controlling every appliance in your home."

      Not to mention those who claimed that clearly it was a worse "couch computer" than a netbook because the netbook has a real keyboard and everyone knows that if you try to type without tactile feedback your hands will burst into flames and Satan(tm) will emerge to claim your soul. Well, at least that's what it sounded like if you added it all up.

      Personally I think it's got potential and there are definitely situations in which I can imagine using an iPad but I currently have no plans to buy one, it's not really the right device for me.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    41. Re:welp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't anyone here yet realise that not everybody has a use for anything that goes beyond web browsing, email and apps?
      The iPad works because it does precisely what most people want - as is - easily and elegantly. The fact that it cannot do anything else is irrelevant to the majority of computer users.
      This isn't about 'yuppie retards', it's about ordinary people using technology that works . . . jeez, even 'just works' if that makes you feel any better. You don't like it, don't buy it.

    42. Re:welp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody likes someone else's success.

    43. Re:welp. by joh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah, most of the /. crowd is formed of IT admins, programmers, and engineers, whose environment is saturated with computers and probably do not need a device that has less functionality than the one they sit in front of all day long. For the basic end-user, it's a nifty device. You're just getting a biased opinion here.

      No, the *real* IT admins, programmers and engineers whose environment is saturated with computers anyway love the iPad, because it is something they can just use for a change. No real IT admin wants to use a real computer for casual things if he can get away with something more simple instead. If you really can't get enough of computers even in your free time you must be fairly fresh to the job.

      Who's hating the iPad are all those people who pretend to be IT professionals and who just hate the thought of something people can just use, because they love to aimlessly tinker around with computers and pretend to be experts. That's the /. crowd today. At least it seems so.

    44. Re:welp. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all that frequent sex with gorgeous women really gets you down after a while. I had to tell Salma to *stop calling*!

    45. Re:welp. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      The only incentive an iPad holds for me is the portability. If I need to access email, documents, literature, or do some programming, I can just use my computer which is fairly customizeable and has no restrictions on what I can install on it. Therefore, I can 'just use' it. It's not the only opinion out there, but I've seen many espouse similar feelings. To me, it's a fad-ish gadget that doesn't offer significant utility over what I have. For others, whose work environment is more mobile, it probably does. Since the majority of my time is spent in front of a computer, I usually don't have a computing task which a) cannot wait until I get to a computer and b) requires some portable device. Again, I should stress that those you view has 'haters' probably just don't have a need for such a device.

    46. Re:welp. by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You guys joke, but I have actually dated women that were known for winning modeling contests, and they always seemed more needy. The women who are used to getting attention all the time get worried and needy when they dont get the attention suddenly because you have to work or you have a personal project you want to finish, and it makes them worry and fear and as the wise Yoda once said, that leads to anger and general b*tch*ness in the end. Granted you can usually catch these sort of women on the way down into depression and get them in the emo "I will try anything to get my self esteem back" phase - its usually worth a week or two of good times until they start feeling better - but really on the other side of the coin I have found that women who don't get attention all the time are usually more happy and easier to spend time with for long amounts of time after the fun is over, and they are generally more appreciative of the time and effort you put into the relationship.

      --
      - d
    47. Re:welp. by Amouth · · Score: 1

      we're Sys Admins - redundancy is our way of life - what else did you expect?

      *door screech* Parity! get back in the closet..

      Now what where we talking about?

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    48. Re:welp. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I've replied to you elsewhere Yamata, but I am not a fanboy. I just love seeing the majority of Slashdot collapse on itself when their stupid, overvoiced and misinformed opinions are shattered with fact. Every day I come to this site to find another article where people bitch and moan about Flash not being on this Apple product and Python not being the language of choice on that Apple product. Do you have any idea how fucking annoying that is? The two threads today... the iPad selling a million and netbook sales down and the callout on the entitlement people feel over how to develop for their iPhone both hit that group really hard and I am relishing in it instead of working on my finals.

    49. Re:welp. by wirah · · Score: 0

      I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Model fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Super Model for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to get laid. 20 minutes. At home, on my Homely, overweight yet loving wife, which by all standards should be a lot less fun than this Supermodel, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    50. Re:welp. by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      I believe we can keep it mostly civil, since I don't give enough of a shit about the iPad to become a target for you, but look at what you posted in response to Zironic's first post there.

      Look at it.

      Tell me that isn't the most trollish, childish nonsense you could think of? That's why I called you a fanboy. If you're not, that's cool, but you're really acting like it.

    51. Re:welp. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I thought Slashdot these days was mostly composed of cranky, entitled children.

      Oh, I guess they could be the new generation of IT admins, "programmers" and "engineers" too.

    52. Re:welp. by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      You haven't been spending enough time with Apple users. The lack of required technical knowledge is NOT why the average Apple fan I have met likes any of their products, it is one factor of a much larger issue, and this is the one that much of Slashdot takes umbrage with:

          Apple products are a fashion accessory for these people, it's got nothing to do with technical knowledge you are correct there, but the reason they *like* Apple products is because they feel it says something special about them as a consumer and an artist, and occasionally (heaven forbid) as a technical genius (there are a LOT of Apple fanatics who believe they understand technology who have no clue whatsoever...people who say things like 'Apple invented C-Plus the programming language by innovating on C, then Microsoft stole their ideas and renamed it C++').

          My experience (okay this is anecdotal I'll admit that) also suggests that Apple fans are firmly convinced that in every technical and manufacturing possibility, the Apple product is innately superior to all of its competitors. They have no technical knowledge, but are completely confident that they are purchasing the highest quality device that is as good as technology can get whenever they buy Apple...no matter what it is they are buying. No matter what information you could give them if they could even understand it, they would simply and smugly believe that the Apple product was just 'better.' This is mainly due to the way Apple products have been marketed ever since they came out in fruity colors.

    53. Re:welp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if it was the coolest fucking thing ever made it would still be dissed here cuz it came form apple.

    54. Re:welp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you wore a cape.

    55. Re:welp. by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I don't care one way or the other whether it succeeds, but a large portion of people here just can't leave it alone - it's not enough to just not buy one, it somehow must be killed with fire.

      I don't really care whether it succeeds or not either, but I can sort of understand the loathing.

      It gets tiring after a while seeing more than one iPad "article" a day, not just on slashdot, but on many of the sites we tend to frequent. We'd like to see something other than iPad/Apple postings. It's not that there aren't other interesting things to discuss either - there are plenty of things going on in the tech/mobile world.

    56. Re:welp. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Actually, point of fact - 5 possible purchasers (friends of mine) that were eagerly awaiting the release in this country went with netbooks after I told them no multi-tasking - "It will work with apps just like your iphone".

      The *only* reason these people were considering it were because of RDF; after all, it's not like they first had a look at one and then decided it could be useful, they decided to get one after seeing pics (perhaps finding a use for it after purchase).

      Apple sells it products this way - no one actually *tries* *it* *out* first.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    57. Re:welp. by wed128 · · Score: 1

      The technical knowledge that they lack is that there are other devices that do (and have been doing) everything the ipad claims to do, cheaper, for years.

      Apple is REALLY GOOD at convincing the public that they have created the next big thing, when really they have just packaged and overpriced the last big thing...

    58. Re:welp. by plalonde2 · · Score: 1
      No, no, no. The iPad is not a giant iPod Touch.

      The iPot Touch is a miniature iPad. You really have to keep that one straight.

    59. Re:welp. by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Hey, Sulking Manchild is playing the side stage at Coachella this year!

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    60. Re:welp. by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      SNIP --> it's just engineered to be something pointless. The term I'd use is "white elephant": it's unique, expensive, and disappointing once the novelty wears off.

      All you can really say is that it is pointless to you alone. You can't speak for other people (even though you apparently think you can/do). You are a very small % of the total population. I don't have an iPad, I don't have a need for one and I have no plans to buy one, but I can easily see their point and their market target.

    61. Re:welp. by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      All you can really say is that it is pointless to you alone.

      Not quite. I can say it's pointless in all objective respects. It doesn't do anything that the iPhone doesn't already do, and it lacks the iPhone's advantages (i.e. portability). It does less than a netbook, and provides few relative advantages there (no more portable, and battery life isn't much better than a good netbook). Even sticking to tablets, the only advantages of the iPad over competing tablets are a slightly bigger screen (for now) and the fact that it runs iPhone apps.

      Those aren't personal opinions. They're statements of fact, just as true for you or anyone else as they are for me.

      The iPad may indeed be the best choice for many people, but it'll be best on subjective grounds: they like its color or shape, or the little picture of an apple, or the fact that it's trendy, etc. It'll be a better fashion accessory or a better toy, not a better computer.

      You can't speak for other people (even though you apparently think you can/do).

      I'm sorry you came to that mistaken conclusion. It's always embarrassing when you tell someone else what they're thinking and you turn out to be wrong, isn't it?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    62. Re:welp. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      In other news, Slashdot posters also declared with authority that "dating supermodels is a real pain in the ass, they are too high-maintenance" and "being rich doesn't make you happy!"

      Budget and pain conscious Slashdotter points out that you can find an very attractive Thai lady that doesn't have the attitude problem or eating disorder for far less then dating a supermodel.

      Dating a supermodel is an ego trip, there are women just as attractive out in the real world and in many parts of this real world are quiet attainable.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    63. Re:welp. by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      It's pointless in all objective respects to YOU. Using your logic: An iPhone is pointless to me (using your logic). All I need is a simple cell phone for phone calls. My cell phone doesn't even do text messaging. And I have no desire to surf the web (or do work or anything else) on a cell phone. An iPod is pointless to me (using your logic). I'm not interested in a portable music device. A netbook is pointless to me. I don't want something that small and cheap. I have a nice Compaq/HP 15" laptop that I use for testing and travel. I mainly use a 24" iMac on my desk, flanked by a PC laptop on my left and a MacBook on my right and a cheapo tower PC on the desk behind me. But - in my view (using my logic), even though I have no use for an iPhone (for example) personally I can see the point of an iPhone and why people like them. And you call it a computer. Technically it is (it contains computer chips, but so does my car and I don't complain about my car not being able to run linux or MS Office, or use vi or whatever), but I think a better term for it is it is an appliance, just like an xbox or wii. And it's not a tablet, either. It's not meant to be a tablet. You compare apples and oranges and won't be happy until that apple is more like an orange. You make pointless comparisons of the iPad to things that have nothing to do with the intended functions/purpose and intended market niche of the iPad.

    64. Re:welp. by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      It's pointless in all objective respects to YOU.

      No, that's the opposite of what "objective" means.

      Using your logic: An iPhone is pointless to me (using your logic). All I need is a simple cell phone for phone calls.

      Again, that's the opposite of what I was saying.

      The iPhone does things that a simple cell phone doesn't. Maybe you don't want to do those things, in which case the iPhone is the wrong phone for you, but it's an objective fact that it has more functionality than the simple cell phone you prefer.

      But - in my view (using my logic), even though I have no use for an iPhone (for example) personally I can see the point of an iPhone and why people like them.

      Yes, and that's what's missing from the iPad. It doesn't do anything that isn't already done by another (cheaper) device. That isn't a matter of personal opinion, it's not something that's only true for me -- it's an objective fact.

      And it's not a tablet, either. It's not meant to be a tablet.

      Wikipedia begs to differ: "The iPad is a tablet computer designed and marketed by Apple for Internet browsing, media consumption, gaming, and light content creation."

      I think you'll find that most writers beg to differ as well. "Tablet" is the term that has been used to refer to devices like the iPad for many years.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    65. Re:welp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, here it seems to be more along the lines of: "If I don't like it, it's crap. And anyone who does is a dumb stupid luser!!!11"

    66. Re:welp. by Tom · · Score: 1

      No, your prediction is missing the point by roughly half an AU.

      A lot of people with tons of technical knowledge are Mac owners and Apple fans. Lots of the people I know who are could easily write their own device drivers. But do they want to do that, or would they rather waste their time on more interesting things?

      It's not about not being able to do low-level stuff, it's about not wanting to bother.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    67. Re:welp. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Please, show me a cheap alternative to the iPad that came out 3 years ago that was heralded as being easy to use as opposed to bombing out of the marketplace.

  10. "Magical" product? by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny

    Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.

    I can't imagine why some people regard Apple as a cult...

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:"Magical" product? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of marketing?

      How strange.

    2. Re:"Magical" product? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      One million iPads in 28 days -- that's less than half of the 74 days it took to achieve this milestone with iPhone,' says Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. 'Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.'

      Oh come on, we can read between the lines. The RDF generator expansion project hasn't kept up with sales. Jobs, you slipped up when you used the word "magical".

    3. Re:"Magical" product? by md65536 · · Score: 1

      magical

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Is it truly magic, or is it just sufficiently advanced technology? Why doesn't he throw in claims that it will make you irresistible to women, promotes a healthy lifestyle by balancing the body's chi, and (as long as he's making false claims) that it supports an "Other OS" install option?

  11. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it has to do more with market saturation than the iPad. All of the Soccer Moms and folks who wanted the small portable cheap computer picked them up over last year and the holidays. These aren't people on a 3 year HW replacement cycle and don't care about power so they're not going to go out and jump for another machine.

    Enough iPad sensationalism.

    1. Re:Sigh by bkpark · · Score: 1

      These aren't people on a 3 year HW replacement cycle and don't care about power so they're not going to go out and jump for another machine.

      Even if they were, netbooks have been out for only 3 years or so. The people replacing their first netbook would be early adopters, which aren't really huge crowds, unless they happen to be Apple fans.

    2. Re:Sigh by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The iPad hit 1,000,000. Confront it, or shut up. You can't explain away sales. Also making your post title "Sigh" makes me feel like I'm responding to some 9th grade emo Otaku who uses *sigh* in pretty much everything they say online.

    3. Re:Sigh by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to compare your predicted dynamics to other novelty products like that: do they have this cycle: 1. induction - growth 2. saturation.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can too explain away sales. It's called finely tuned marketing.

    5. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for pulling this one out of your arse...

  12. One million by Zerth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm going to feel just a little bit sad for the owners of those million iPads when they drop the price and kick out the next version in 6 months. They'll be outraged, but Jobs will just say "hey, at least it wasn't 2 months this time!"

    1. Re:One million by clifyt · · Score: 1

      Apple generally waits a year to introduce major revisions.

      However, people toward the end of the year freak the hell out after they've done no research and end up buying something that is outdated....those in the first million? We know we are buying a first gen product...I sold my 1st Gen iPhone overseas after the 3GS came out and it paid for itself. At this point, I wish I had two iPads...one for around the house duties...cookbooks and otherwise, anything that people can just pick up and put down where ever...and another one just for me...

      So in a year from now, I'll probably buy the next gen..if it makes sense to (I didn't buy the iPhone 3G because it didn't offer enough of an upgrade to care...the 3GS? yes...)

    2. Re:One million by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 'cuz that doesn't happen with other computing devices.

    3. Re:One million by Ogive17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm going to feel just a little bit sad for the owners of those million iPads when they drop the price and kick out the next version in 6 months. They'll be outraged, but Jobs will just say "hey, at least it wasn't 2 months this time!"

      Not only that, the next version will come with features that should have been included on the 1st one. Apple always fucks over the early adopters... yet they keep falling for the same trick every time. I know if I ever had the urge to buy an Apple product, I'd wait til the 2nd or 3rd generation. By then the price would have dropped and the list of features would be more in line with the price. This is why I told my gf to not buy an iPad yet... probably get a better one for half the price in another year.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    4. Re:One million by s73v3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Care to name any other company that doesn't do this? Every company adds features to their products as the years go on.

    5. Re:One million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, but then you find that you REALLY wanted the new high end version, so waiting costs twice as much anyway.

    6. Re:One million by Kimen · · Score: 0

      You meanl like every other desktop, laptop, and netbook on the planet?

    7. Re:One million by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Not every company holds features out at the beginning and adds them in later... if you are willing to pay for the next generation device.

      You don't find it weird that 1st gen Apple devices usually lack basic features that competing devices have had for awhile? Every product they have it's been night and day between the 1st and 2nd/3rd generations. Maybe I'll buy a 2nd or 3rd generation iPad, but I'll never pay for a 1st gen Apple product.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    8. Re:One million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what exactly do you recommend that the users use in those six months? Also, we can mostly assume that there will be a full year before the next update.

    9. Re:One million by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      No. Most of the other products shoehorn a bunch of features right away, but most of them are only half baked. Apple may do fewer features, but they do the most important ones, and they do them extremely well.

    10. Re:One million by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      This is why I told my gf to not buy an iPad yet... probably get a better one for half the price in another year.

      If she needs it now, she needs it now. Waiting a year doesn't let her use it now, so why bother suggesting that?

    11. Re:One million by dangitman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not every company holds features out at the beginning and adds them in later...

      Spoken like somebody who knows nothing about software or hardware development. Do you think Apple just has a pile of these "features" sitting around and says "hey, let's exclude this feature so we can screw customers again in the future"?

      Software development takes time. Features that armchair pundits think are "trivial" actually take a lot of work and testing to implement. And features don't exist in isolation. They live within a system, where different parts are dependent on others. So, if you want good software it takes time and hard decisions to get it right. Of course, you could just add features in a rushed, half-assed manner, but then you don't end up with good software.

      Hardware is similar - you have to balance a whole range of factors - battery life, physical space and form factor, cost, heat, component availability, industrial design, manufacturing technology. A wafer-thin portable computer is not just something you hack together.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    12. Re:One million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah me too. Let's say it is 6 months this time like you're predicting, and the price is the worst drop, it goes from $500 to a hugely aggressive $350. Let's imagine you have the chance to buy an iPad now or in six months. Would you still sit in your couch between 6 and 11 PM watching great movies, having a blast surfing the web and playing games, if you knew that those 3 hours, maybe 4 or even 5 on weekends, cost you, let's see, $150 divided by 180 days, holy shit that is a staggering 83 cents per day just because you have it instead of are waiting for it!!!

      I mean you basically have the following choices:
      - Get up in time to start working at 9
      - Work until 5, making whatever you make.
      - Now you're home at say 6 or 7. You now have two choices for the following three hours:
            - Don't have an iPad there, but save a staggering $0.86 cents by buying it for only $350 six months later!
            - Have an iPad there, watch great movies and play awesome games on it.... but feel the sting of 0.86 just in depreciation costs.

      Who would choose the latter choice? Obviously the only people who would buy an iPad now are the people stupid enough to buy a coffee, or a bagel or muffin, or anything, really, in the course of their day.

      In other words, shut the fuck up.

  13. Why do people buy an iPad? by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An iPad is a big iPod Touch. It's a toy. Fun for the whole family, and even geeks love them... but it is still a toy.

    A Netbook is another name for a cheap laptop. You can do real work on a netbook, and by work I mean Microsoft Office and Quickbooks work.

    So if people were buying netbooks just for fun, then maybe those who think they could have more fun with an iPad are opting for those instead, but it seems like the iPad is selling to a whole new audience that wouldn't have bought a Netbook to begin with like...

    Apple users who wanted a Netbook (Apple only has expensive laptops)

    1. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This may come as a shock to you but there are millions of people who don't need to do "real work" with an electronic device. Not everyone compiles Linux kernels, uses accounting software an needs to write the great American novel on a portable tablet. You want to do that shit, sit down on a chair in from a computer and go to it.

      Networks are garbage and that's why when given a choice, the iPad has a very large market it can tap into.

    2. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      What do you have against networks?

    3. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      Is a toy something you use to read books? Do you watch movies on a toy, update facebook on a toy, write on a toy? (And yes it's great for writing especially right after you wake up and you want to write down this great idea you had in your sleep).

      If that's all true then yes, iPad is a toy. But in my experience (actually owning one), it is a netbook replacement.

      If I need to do development (which I do) I use my company laptop or my iMac. (Clearly I have a thing for big displays.)

    4. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each time Apple create a new product, some people say: "It's a toy". Graphical user interface with mouse was a toy, QuickTime was a toy, phone with touch screen was a toy and now and now, iPad is a toy. I think that simple and "ludic" devices will sell more and more in the future...

    5. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can do real work on a netbook, and by work I mean Microsoft Office and Quickbooks work.

      You know, I think you've basically just proved Apple's marketing campaign for the last several years.

      Usually the PC is saying they can do spreadsheets and other similar boring business type tasks. The Mac is more concerned about doing interesting things like managing photos and playing music and having a life.

      To a lot of people, Microsoft Office and Quickbooks aren't things they want to do. Apple seems to have made a market about selling people devices which do fun things. And, yes, that likely is a whole new audience.

      The fact they've sold a million in this timeframe means it's a big audience. I don't know what I'd do with one, but what I've seen of them makes me secretly want one -- I won't be buying one, but I do covet them.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      A Netbook is another name for a cheap laptop.

      That perception is exactly the problem! The point of a netbook was never just to be cheap; the point was to be small (but not too small, like a PDA/smartphone). Recall that the first Eee PC came out at a time when you could easily get a 15"-screen, 10 lb. laptop for the same $300 that the Eee PC cost, but you sure as Hell couldn't easily get anything the same size!

      Since then, manufacturers have been forgetting this point and started making bigger and bigger "netbooks," and that's what's killing their sales.

      The reason the iPad is selling so well is that that sort of thinness and lightness is what netbook buyers have been really wanting from the beginning, and Apple finally got it right!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd venture to guess that most people who bought a netbook thought that they were getting a cute, little, simple computer that while unable to do everything their main PC could do would still be fun around the house. Instead, what they got was a full computer with full computer problems (anti-virus, malware, bloatware, Windows administration, etc.) in an underpowered package.

      As to your classification of the iPad as a toy, only time will tell if people end up using it for real "work." I've spend most of my life using computers far less powerful than the iPad, so I am inclined to believe that those people who do want to use it productively will.

    8. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by jcr · · Score: 0, Troll

      An iPad is a big iPod Touch.

      A swimming pool is a big bathtub. Are you starting to get some idea of how silly that complaint is?

      A 1024x768 display, a ten hour battery life, and multi-touch UI, make it an excellent tool for a lot of applications. There are a whole lot of iPhone apps that make much more sense on an iPad.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      This is an awesome comment.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    10. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The only people that expect anyone to write on this TOY are those that are swimming in the cool-aid.

      The Mac never got anywhere really so they are desperately hoping that their pet brand achieves world domination with the iPad instead.

      And yes, my movie player with 250G storage space is indeed a TOY.

      Some of us don't need to kid ourselves.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Usually the PC is saying they can do spreadsheets and other similar boring business type tasks. The Mac is more concerned about doing interesting things like managing photos and playing music and having a life.

      Like this?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    12. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Is a toy something you use to read books? Do you watch movies on a toy, update facebook on a toy, write on a toy? (And yes it's great for writing especially right after you wake up and you want to write down this great idea you had in your sleep).

      If that's all true then yes, iPad is a toy.

      Yes, it is. The key point is that the iPad is actually worse at all those tasks than other devices you can get for the same price (or less). So what are you paying for? The shiny novelty factor. That's what makes it a toy.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    13. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      I truly hope you're being sarcastic, but am terrified that you may not be.

    14. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      This may come as a shock to you but there are millions of people who don't need to do "real work" with an electronic device. Not everyone compiles Linux kernels,

      Does compiling Linux kernels count as "real work"?

    15. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I think the comment I was responding to really catches an crucial aspect of Ipad sales that a lot of people here are missing. Why do you hope I'm being sarcastic?

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    16. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Arkham · · Score: 1

      [quote]A Netbook is another name for a cheap laptop. You can do real work on a netbook, and by work I mean Microsoft Office and Quickbooks work.[/quote]

      So you're saying that I've never done any work in my entire life? I've been working in corporate America for 16 years and I've never done "Microsoft Office and Quickbooks work".

      There are other kinds of work than the kind you do. Personally, I hate Netbooks. Crappy, underpowered computers with cramped keyboards and terrible, tiny screens. I find the iPad a lot more useful than a netbook. Neither of them can replace the 23" monitor hooked up to the Linux machine where I do my software development. The idea of running Eclipse on a netbook screen makes me cringe. I have a Lenovo T400 with a 1440x900 screen, and I hate even doing development on it (though the idea of writing code on Windows is nauseating in itself). At least with the iPad, there's no false premise of it being a content creation tool like there is with a netbook.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    17. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      Because the "lol Apples are for people that HAVE A LIFE" mentality is the most obnoxious thing to come out of the Apple vs. Everything else dichotomy.

    18. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      A lot of the comments here are "I'm a compsci guy who runs Linux on his netbook--I think you're crazy to want an Ipad." This misses the point that iPads are about having a convenient device that makes casual computing tasks like reading or surfing the web or playing sudoko or displaying recipes very easy. People here approach the iPad as a crippled laptop, while people who buy them are buying a device that makes those casual and fun tasks very easy and accessible. It's not about smug Apple owners, it's about mistaking the purpose of the device.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    19. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Because the "lol Apples are for people that HAVE A LIFE" mentality is the most obnoxious thing to come out of the Apple vs. Everything else dichotomy.

      OK, my bad for actually using the words "having a life".

      But, the poster I was responding to was asking why on Earth anyone would own an iPad since you can't do and "work" on it. When he defined "work", he specifically mentioned lame stuff like Microsoft Office and a spreadsheet for crying out loud.

      My point is that maybe, just maybe, people will be using the iPad as more of a utility and entertainment device, instead of as a tool for doing what is essentially chores. I also pointed out that the poster was essentially sounding like a proof of Apple's marketing campaign that stereo-types PC's as being all about the Office apps (which you can agree with or disagree with at your leisure).

      On a site where literally hundreds of people are frothing at the mouth over the functionality of a device they can't see the merit of, don't want, and are convinced everyone is wrong and the people buying iPads must be insane ... it's kind of amusing to be bitching about who has a life.

      I never cease to be amused by the fact that people here on Slashdot have already made up their minds so strongly, that trying to explain a contrary position (regardless of if you're advocating it) causes people to disagree because they're no longer capable of thinking about it objectively.

      Go back and read my post. I was merely trying to answer the poster's question and offer some perspective.

      But, don't let any that get in the way of your whining about Apple. And, certainly, don't wonder what about this device is so compelling they've sold a million of then in 28 days.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    20. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

      Bingo. My home office computer is a Mac, I love it. Built in BSD tools if I need to do work that uses them, great editing tools for what I do, and I LOVE the iLife suite. For plugging in my camera, grabbing family photos, sending them off to print, uploading to Facebook, etc., is all really easy. Editing videos is easy, etc.

      The fact that this stuff just works is important to me.

      Could I crunch some of the big spreadsheets I do in Excel on Excel for Mac... not without a lot of pain. But can I knock off a letter, edit an image, crop something from a website to send (Preview is a killer app, opens nearly instantaneously without the aggravation of Adobe reader), etc. It's easy and stays out of my way.

      And the sleep actually works, I can pop into the office, do something for 10 minutes, and leave to go back to my life, without my work flow being interrupted.

      I know that Windows added their version of Fast User Switching, and maybe Windows 7 got it right, but nothing seemed as seamless as on OS X.

      I use a Blackberry as my business connectivity Smart Phone, and I like the keyboard, but if it wasn't a business tool, I'd be all over an iPhone. I don't need more time wasting equipment or I'd look at an iPad, just doesn't fit my life, but I appreciate what it does.

      Office work, yeah, the Mac is second fiddle, but Quickbooks online is "enough" for me, don't want to switch back to Quickbooks, mostly because I can check into thinks from home or the office, which is pretty nice without hauling a laptop around.

      Apple makes cool products for people that benefit from them. That isn't everybody, but they have a decent sized customer base because upper income professionals with families and limited free time happens to be a lucrative market. Good for them, they build a better mousetrap.

    21. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Small and cheap. Ultra portable "sub-notebooks" have been around for years, but cost at least a grand. Although a slightly different form factor, see also: the inability for UMPC/Oragami to gain tractions. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/umpc/default.mspx

    22. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      Because some people like toys.

      And I can do real work on the oversized iPod touch (btw, the oversized part is the point, it's a relatively large one too considering developers have complained about not having enough real estate to do some of the things they would like to be doing with the device.)

      I bought a netbook last year (HP Mini 1035nr). I've touched it twice in the last month since I've owned my iPad. That toy has gotten more productive work done than my netbook ever did.

      Better email browser, better web browser. Logmein and iSSH have given me better portals to my desktop/server and my macbook so I can work in the living room while sitting back and listening to my music collection on my headphones. It's bliss, and maybe I drank the kool aid, but it's REALLY FUCKING GOOD KOOLAID if you can see past your own insecurities. Hell, the price isn't even bad when you consider the netbook cost me just about as much and never really gave me the full functionality I was after and I had to work around it's incapabilities.
       

    23. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      This may come as a shock to him too that the real geek crowd typically owns many computing devices and maybe having one that acts as a good portal to others is really amazing. Who cares if it lacks power, I have power at my desktop.

      I get to recompile kernels, encode my dvd collection to h.264 with handbrake and then turn around to play a round of Plants vs Zombies, Scrabble or Carcassonne (it's coming) all from my iPad.

    24. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by LodCrappo · · Score: 1

      lame stuff like Microsoft Office and a spreadsheet for crying out loud.

      Microsoft sold 120 million Office 2007 licenses in the first six months.

      Maybe your idea of what people consider "lame" isn't in line with the real world?

      http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY08/ElopFAM2008.mspx

      --
      -Lod
    25. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      You know, as a web developer, the iPad makes the perfect tool when meeting with clients. More so than any clunky laptop, netbook, or MS tablet. It has an appropriate screen size, is easy to show or hand around, and is easy for the client to use. People keep going on about how this is a great thing to have around the house or to take away on holiday, but it will also be an important business tool for many. That's always seemed obvious to me.

  14. Not surprising by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NetBooks were always strange devices. Marginally more portable than a laptop (although not portable enough to fit in a pocket), and a lot less powerful. Their only real advantage was their cost. They were very cheap, but since the original EeeeeeeeeeeeeePC they've gradually crept up in price and now they're just too expensive for what they are.

    The iPad, in contrast, is not just a cheap laptop. It fills a distinctly different need to a laptop. I've not entirely worked out what that need is - it seems to target a market that doesn't contain me - but it's clearly not the same set of uses as a laptop.

    The iPad isn't killing Netbooks, they're doing that all by themselves. The iPad is just giving people who might have bought one and never used it after the first couple of months something different to waste their money on.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Not surprising by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      With proper work, though, the modern netbook could easily morph into the next all-purpose tablet device. A touch-screen optimized interface on top of a slimmed OS and a few minor hardware design changes are all that are really needed to make a netbook into a powerful iPad competitor. Sadly, the OS/software is the real hangup.

    2. Re:Not surprising by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The iPad has a better screen than most netbooks and a longer battery life.
      I am still waiting for a smartbook. I don't need windows on a mobile device. I have a notebook if I need windows.
      I can do everything I want on a mobile device just fine with Linux on an ARM.
      I would like Flash for it until Firefox decides to support H.264 but other than that I really could do everything on Ubuntu running on say a TegraII with a nice screen.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Not surprising by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They were very cheap, but since the original EeeeeeeeeeeeeePC they've gradually crept up in price and now they're just too expensive for what they are.

      I know. There should be vast numbers of $200 netbooks, and there aren't. The PC industry was terrified of that price drop, and with Microsoft's help, managed to fight it off.

      I have several of the original EeePC machines. Their Linux has a built-in self-destruct feature. Their "union file system" loses inodes over time. As a test, I have one plugged in and completely idle; it loses about 1% of its inodes per day. When all the inodes are gone, the machine stops working. There is a workaround for this, which must be applied every 90 days of power-on time, or sooner if you actually use the machine. The vendor-recommended procedure, though, is to reinitialize the machine to the factory-empty state, losing all user files.

      And people wonder why Linux hasn't succeeded on the desktop.

    4. Re:Not surprising by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      The iPad isn't killing Netbooks, they're doing that all by themselves.

      While I think the iPad is unquestionably having an impact on netbook sales, I think your point here is also 100% correct. Netbooks previously were very inexpensive computing options. Lean, mean, cheap machines. Recently, however, the typical drive for bigger numbers and more features has pushed the prices back up to the same level as a full-fledged laptop which forces a consumer to ask "if I'm spending that much money, why am I getting a tiny machine? Why not just buy a laptop?" When the price was in the $150-$250 range, there was a compelling reason to buy a netbook (assuming that's all you needed) - the price. That edge is now gone.

      It should be surprising to nobody that netbook sales are declining.

    5. Re:Not surprising by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      The iPad, in contrast, is not just a cheap laptop. It fills a distinctly different need to a laptop. I've not entirely worked out what that need is - it seems to target a market that doesn't contain me - but it's clearly not the same set of uses as a laptop.

      Well, if it was, say, $200 cheaper (ie, the $300-400 range), I'd seriously consider getting one as a coffee table computer. ie, something to break out when I want to quickly look up the name of an actor on IMDB, check the local movie theatre listings, or check gmail. Heck, even for some extended, light browsing (eg, checking my GReader feeds) it's probably a really nice alternative to pulling out a laptop.

      But at $500? It's just too steep for the functionality it offers (at least IMHO, but I'm also really really cheap :)...

    6. Re:Not surprising by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Thank you, you hit the point I have as well. The key factor that drove netbook sales was price. As companies started increasing the price point, sales fell. Of course, what the companies that were busy raising the prices of netbooks apparently didn't realize was that the majority of people who haven't already bought a netbook who are potential purchasers of netbooks were waiting for the prices to come down some more. I would love a 7" netbook for $150. For more than $300, I may as well spend the extra money and get a full blown laptop.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    7. Re:Not surprising by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think most people who bought netbooks really wanted an iPad-like device from the beginning, but settled because no such thing existed (for example, I ended up with a Tablet PC, bought just before the first netbook came out). Netbooks started off as a poor compromise, and only got worse (bigger and heavier) over time.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Not surprising by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      NetBooks were always strange devices. Marginally more portable than a laptop (although not portable enough to fit in a pocket), and a lot less powerful. Their only real advantage was their cost. They were very cheap, but since the original EeeeeeeeeeeeeePC

      This is BS. Netbooks are much more portable than traditional laptops. They crossed the 1.2 Kg barrier, which is where one doesn't mind just throwing it in the backpack and go for a walk or a bicycle ride, and not really notice it. That's a HUGE difference. It cannot be explained to someone who doesn't carry his/her laptop frequently.

      And your mindless (of little intelligence) mocking of the Eee PC shows your bias.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    9. Re:Not surprising by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are some situations where netbooks work well, usually they involve field workers in non-harsh environments who have to run full desktop apps but want a 2 pound laptop instead of a 5 pound one.

      What people really want -- and always wanted -- is an electronic substitute for a clipboard. They've been using netbooks (and Tablet PCs before that) because that's all that was available; now that the iPad exists there's no surprise that it's killing off those other devices! It still needs to lose another pound and get a better method of text/handwriting entry, though. (And be less proprietary...)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:Not surprising by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      The problem is no one successfully implements this. What you are saying basically is that Apple sucks and if everyone else could pull devices like this off, the way that Apple does, they would be much better.

    11. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with Linux on the desktop but rather with what Asus (or whoever developed Xandros) has done to Linux.

    12. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (although not portable enough to fit in a pocket)

      The first eeepc fits in an airman's front hip pocket. Then again, an ipad almost does.

    13. Re:Not surprising by darthservo · · Score: 1

      ...in contrast, is not just a cheap laptop. It fills a distinctly different need to a laptop. I've not entirely worked out what that need is - it seems to target a market that doesn't contain me - but it's clearly not the same set of uses as a laptop.

      Couldn't help but chuckle after reading this description, as it for some reason reminded me of the Palm Foleo. DISCLAIMER: I am not insinuating that the iPad is the same things as a Foleo. Just thought it was interesting how the intended use of the Foleo has some similarities with this description. Also interesting to see what Palm got wrong, mainly hardware tie-in.

      --

      Prove it.

    14. Re:Not surprising by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      Please oh knowledgeable one, what you describe is what I need. But the prices are insane. I need something:

      1) Really light.
      2) Will allow me to copy a few Windows files to a USB stick to give to a client.
      3) Check my email.
      4) Notepad.

      That's all I want. Should I just play Russian roulette and hope I get a functioning used Aspire One off ebay?

    15. Re:Not surprising by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Laptops are now cheap across the board. You don't have to call them a netbook, especially when competing against an $800 device with only 64G.

      Owning an iPad would not stop me from bringing the netbook or Archos along for things the iPad can't handle.

      It's certainly not going to obsolete devices with proper keyboards.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please note that this argument also applies to Windows Mobile. Bare MS and industrial-rated images are stable. When HP or HTC get their hands on it, it turns into crap. Yet Microsoft still gets the blame. I think this is a large part of the draconian restrictions on Windows Phone 7 devices.

    17. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their only real advantage was their cost.

      Are you kidding me? The first and foremost advantage of a netbook is portability. A 14" laptop is a behemoth compared to an 8-10" netbook. What I want is a mini-computer that I can stuff into my backpack and head off to South America. A netbook is precisely that. A 14" laptop isn't even close.

    18. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set up a cron job to do it?

    19. Re:Not surprising by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That's a HUGE difference. It cannot be explained to someone who doesn't carry his/her laptop frequently.

      Exactly! And one reason the iPad is succeeding is that it's managed to shave off another half a pound.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ladies & gentlemen I give you whisper jeff, the man with an apple shaped hole in his heart!

      watch and wonder as this pitiful little creep demonstrates his devotion to steve jobs by taking his member into his mouth once again, and going at it like there is no tomorrow.

      on second thoughts you'd probably rather not =(

    21. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where you are wrong.

      Linux HAS succeeded on the desktop. Unfortunately the standard metric is customer sales, and Corporate licensing. Something the majority of desktop linux users have nothing to do with.

    22. Re:Not surprising by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why Linux hasn't succeeded on the desktop.

      Luckily, none of the distros I've on my DESKTOP have ever had such an abomination.

      I'll admit that that would cause Linux on EeePC machines to fail. :p

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    23. Re:Not surprising by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      My netbook is more portable than my laptop, but still not good enough, and the tradeoff is a crappy screen and a crappier keyboard.

      My iPad is more portable than my netbook, and the screen & keyboard are better than the netbook's. Its tradeoff is that there are things it can't do (even compared to netbooks), but for plain web-surfing, email-checking, ebook-reading, it kicks my netbook's underpowered ass.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    24. Re:Not surprising by Heshler · · Score: 1

      Mod Up! These are exactly my feelings about the (sort of) iPad market. It's unfortunate that resistive (stylus) and capacitive (touch) screens are mutually exclusive (as far as I know). What I envision is being able to walk around a factory, scribbling notes into my electronic pad (which get converted to text), and then splitting my screen to use half of it to operate or run diagnostics on equipment remotely. Then later I can prop it up and connect it to a bluetooth keyboard (and mouse?) to type up a report. Also cool would be for it to automatically synch with several light, thin display devices, allowing us to do away with the mess of paper/textbooks that comes from studying.

    25. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have an EEE PC and you haven't installed the Ubuntu Netbook Remix, it's your own fault. Suffer, lazybones.

    26. Re:Not surprising by domatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have Ubuntu Netbook Remix installed on a 4G 701. The camera, wireless, sd card and all the rest work with current software and no "self-destructing inode" misfeature bugs. It was all autodetected so I didn't have to do any system administration to get the hardware lit up. I like the interface better than what came on the Xandros as well.

    27. Re:Not surprising by westlake · · Score: 1

      But that form factor really stinks if you have bad eyes and big fingers.

      which is another way of saying that we all grow older.

      it's a one-two marketing punch when you have a product that appeals to your youthful self-image and the cold hard reality of the present.

    28. Re:Not surprising by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      Indeed, nobody has successfully implemented this, and you are also putting words in my mouth. I think the iPad is a great product which is astronomically out of my price range for what it can do. I think current technologies used in netbooks could produce a competitor with more power and just as much battery life provided some company can find a way to challenge Apple's OS-level approach to the iPad. It may be that Google is key to offering any meaningful competition to the iPad.

    29. Re:Not surprising by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why Linux hasn't succeeded on the desktop.

      I think it was part of the OEMs ploy to get cheap XP licences. They (Asus) release a machine that Vista can't physically can't fit on the SSD, ship it with the crappiest Linux distro they can find, include XP drivers on the DVD, and have half the manual talking about how to install XP

      That said, I bought my Linux EeePC701 with the intention of putting XP on it, and the way I have it set up, it works very well.

      As far as price creep, the 701 was $400, had a 3 hour battery, 512MB RAM, and 800x480 screen. For $300-$350 you can now buy a netbook with 8 hour battery, 1GB RAM and 1024x600 screen.

    30. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...And people wonder why Linux hasn't succeeded on the desktop."

      This is a great example of why confusing an OS using the Linux kernel (aka distribution, if you ask me) and the kernel called "Linux" is so dangerous, and why RMS goes on and on about calling it "GNU/Linux". Asus makes a buggy filesystem, but all Linux-based OSes get lumped together and blasted by Animats.

    31. Re:Not surprising by EtherGnat · · Score: 0

      "Marginally more portable than a laptop"

      It's a big difference to me. I've got 13", 15", and 17" laptops I can take with me, but I frequently travel light. My 9" netbook will fit in a carry on, backpack, and even my small dSLR sling.

      "They were very cheap, but since the original EeeeeeeeeeeeeePC they've gradually crept up in price and now they're just too expensive for what they are."

      Now you're just making stuff up. The original Eee PC was $399 with a 7" screen. Two and a half years later they hover around the $300 mark with a 10" screen and much better specs.

      I don't see what's so strange about them. I gave $230 netbooks to both my mother and my sister (neither computer whizzes) for Christmas and they think they're the best thing ever. Batteries that last forever, enough power for basic tasks (they both have other laptops), easy to carry around, light enough and cool enough they're not uncomfortable to have on your lap... what's not to like?

      Hell, even with a full powered laptop sitting right next to my netbook on the coffee table I'll normally grab the latter if all I'm doing is chatting or basic surfing. Sure, it's not for everybody, but I don't see what's so mystical about why so many people love them.

      --
      iddqd
    32. Re:Not surprising by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      No, it has nothing to do with GNU/Linux being more than just Linux, because unionfs is a part of Linux (not an ASUS part, a standard part). Anyone using unionfs would experience the same problem even if they were using a BSD or Solaris userland.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    33. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... that's a fault with Asus and not Linux. They implemented it badly. But that shouldn't be a big problem since most EeePC owners probably have installed a different distro, like Eeebuntu, anyway.

      I really love my 901 with Eeebuntu :)

    34. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but... I see a big problem with your logic.
      Never mind the fact that I could add an /etc/inittab entry to run this script every time I turned on the computer (or off, for that matter).

      Linux hasn't succeeded (although you could even argue that it has started to) because Bill Gates got lucky with IBM, and IBM gave away everything needed to build a PC clone. Microsoft was the original IBM supplier, and so became the original clone supplier. Windows helped propel them, too.
      Mac products are targeted at higher end markets... with a bit extra money to spend. But it's great stuff. I have an old Quicksilver that I'm using now, and it's running Leopard perfectly. Never crashed once, even with the amount and intensity of stuff I do. I could say less for Windows.
      In addition, no one has really made Linux a commercially viable product. Since no one gets paid to do it, it stays an OS which requires actual knowledge. If someone actually took the time to make it into a well-polished product (which SuSE is pretty close to - its packages are always slightly out-of-date, yet stable) and stuck a more familiar interface on it, made it run Office, then it would sell. Easy, The biggest part is really the interface.... "What's umounting a disk?", even though that's what "safely eject hardware" does.
      I like being a person with a brain.

    35. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This appears to simply be temporary files that aren't being cleaned up, a simple cron job would fix it, but whatever the source is is probably ASUS's own software.

    36. Re:Not surprising by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why Linux hasn't succeeded on the desktop.

      Well, for one thing, you're talking about netbooks, not laptops ;-) And for another, I don't think most Linux distros have a self-destruct feature where they randomly lose inodes for no reason. That probably isn't the reason Linux isn't taking over the desktop...

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    37. Re:Not surprising by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      IMO Apple did get some things right with the iPad. If you want to compete in a more mobile segment than existing devices you do not include a keyboard (which like doubles the metric volume of the device) or use an X86 CPU instead of ARM (which has worse power characteristics, meaning you need a heavier battery). The device should be light enough to hold for a prolonged time. If anything I think the CPU is probably overpowered...

      My problem is with several other things. Namely the lack of standard interface ports on the device, or the positively pathetic OS support for things regular people will want to do with the device like LAN printing. Or with the input resolution: I expect to be able to produce content on such a device, which requires finer input than my finger can provide (optional pen input would solve this). This is clearly a first generation device which is unfit for most of my purposes. I also disdain Apple's totalitarian application environment. I dispute the idea that you will not want to do software development on such a device. My Commodore 64, heck even my Amiga, was much more underpowered and I did software development on it. I should be able to do anything I damn please on my own device.

    38. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

  15. netbooks just aren't that useful for the avg dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm saying they two are only slightly related. Many people bought netbooks last year as they were the must have item. But slow performance and the limited usability for "Joe Sixpack" might have caught up with the market.
     

  16. an Apple story a day keeps the nerd rage aflame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this where I come to complain about there being to many goddamned Apple stories on /. ?!

  17. Not surprising by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the vast majority of end users, especially those who don't care what's running their devices, the iPad is a good enough substitute for a full laptop PC. The screen is big enough to do serious browsing (unless you use Flash...) and it doubles as a book reader/media player. The major problems I've always had with netbooks is the desktop OS (Linux or Windows) crammed onto a too-small screen, the speed and the tiny keyboards. I've tried to like them - I really have. But that form factor really stinks if you have bad eyes and big fingers.

    (And no, I don't own an iPad. I'm the old fogey in the corner with a 14" laptop.)

    Even with the lack of Flash,a keyboard and a mainstream OS, the iPad as a netbook replacement is not totally out to lunch. There are some situations where netbooks work well, usually they involve field workers in non-harsh environments who have to run full desktop apps but want a 2 pound laptop instead of a 5 pound one.

  18. Inaccurate summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Growth in netbook sales is slowed down to "only" 6% YOY as of April. This means that they're just as strong as last year, just not going up at an insane exponential rate which is, by definition unsustainable for many generations. They are not *cratering* as the summary implies.

  19. Fingerprints on the screen by birukun · · Score: 1

    I can't get past the fingerprints all over the screen. Who can enjoy a movie/web experience having to look past all the smudges?

    I will keep my Netbook, thank you.

    --
    Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
    1. Re:Fingerprints on the screen by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

      It's probably my OCD talking, but this has always been my problem with touch-screen devices as a whole.

    2. Re:Fingerprints on the screen by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The fingerprints aren't really that visible when it's in use. I'll admit they are kind of ugly when the iP* is blank.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  20. Tablets and Netbooks are Apple(s) and Oranges by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    Oh, I'd take an iPad over a netbook anyday. That's not a hard task as I have want for a netbook. I also have zero want for an iPad, not because it's a bad product but because I have zero want to play in Steve Jobs playground with quarter slots on all the preapproved swings and slides. I really hope someone can manage to make a slider tablet where the keyboard slides out and configures the tablet into netbook factor, for when that 3rd mocha breve inspires you to pound out Shakespeare. Preferably in WebOS or Android flavors. They might not be as sweet, but they won't give you diabetes.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    1. Re:Tablets and Netbooks are Apple(s) and Oranges by VMaN · · Score: 1

      If you'd take an ipad over a netbook you have a more than zero want for a ipad.

      -logic nazi

    2. Re:Tablets and Netbooks are Apple(s) and Oranges by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 0

      Logic Nazi wannabe. Try this on for size - Maybe his want for the iPad is zero, but his desire for a notebook is less than zero.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
  21. iPad can't do everything my laptop can by rjamestaylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it's true iPad cannot doesn't allow me to do everything my laptop does, I find that for most of the things I do with a laptop the iPad excels. Especially consuming content. Creating content is getting better (I'm more used to the keyboard and use an external BT keyboard for long writing sessions), iSSH makes it bearable to manage my servers remotely (the only servers I use anymore are "remote"), and when off work the iPad is a fantastic movie and gaming platform.

    So, I am finding myself using my iPad more and my laptop less. (Ironically, I'm writing this from my MacBookPro :)

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:iPad can't do everything my laptop can by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      I don't blame you, I can't use slashdot on my iPad. It defaults to the mobile version which makes it impossible to read normal conversations.

    2. Re:iPad can't do everything my laptop can by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      What's with that logo after your username? Some googling showed it to be your company's logo, but I don't understand why it would be displayed with your posts.

      It's really eye-catching in a land of plaintext usernames. In a bad way.

    3. Re:iPad can't do everything my laptop can by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Here's a thread that discusses the reason for the logo.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    4. Re:iPad can't do everything my laptop can by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      I think I was going to whine about advertising, but I like that guy's full disclosure argument and the related one about doing the same for the chronic corporate apologist armies of apple and such.

      Carry on knowing you have placated the curiosity of some random jerkoff lol

    5. Re:iPad can't do everything my laptop can by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Well, that's all that matters, right? :)

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    6. Re:iPad can't do everything my laptop can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. The iPad is a far easier device to use when you're consuming content. Not only that, but it looks damn good too.

      How many people (apart from us) actually create content? What are the stats out there on how many readers actually comment? Something like 1%?

      All I'm saying is that most people just take and take, they don't really give. The iPad is a big win with that.

  22. That doesn't make any sense. by mosb1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People buy toys. . .

    1. Re:That doesn't make any sense. by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

      Yup, like Tickle Me Elmo. Remember that hyped up toy? A few Wal-mart employees got trampled to death upon opening the doors to parents on release day. Nowadays, how often do you hear about that toy? It's pretty much lost in obscurity at this point. How long before the iPad faces the same fate?

    2. Re:That doesn't make any sense. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Like surf boards or dirt bikes or gaming consoles? How long 'till they share the same fate?

    3. Re:That doesn't make any sense. by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      Not if they're single or married....

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    4. Re:That doesn't make any sense. by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      So only divorced, widowed or dead people can buy them?

  23. Sheer Madness by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'One million iPads in 28 days -- that's less than half of the 74 days it took to achieve this milestone with iPhone,'

    Isn't it crazy how fast people will belly up to throw cash at you when you're not also forcing them into a two year cellphone plan with AT&T with high monthly payments? I know you need a service plan to use the iPad's 3G but there's also a model with no 3G. I wonder what the breakdown of that million sales looks like (yes, I know the 3G just came out). I'd wager the faster adoption of the iPad is mostly due to the consumer's ability to make their own choices. Consumer options are a good thing. I know that's not the way Jobs likes to do things but that's just my analysis.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Sheer Madness by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      So long as you don't give consumers too many choices. Then they often become incapable of distinguishing real value as it is often obscured by nearly identical, yet somehow different, options.

    2. Re:Sheer Madness by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hence the ipod touch?

    3. Re:Sheer Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But those people already bought the iPod Touch... Same exact thing without the phone.

    4. Re:Sheer Madness by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 0, Troll

      You just said it's not Jobs' way to give the consumer choices after stating that the iPad gave consumers choices...Slashdot can be do pathetic sometimes...you guys are really reaching here for something to hate Apple for.

    5. Re:Sheer Madness by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple's counting technique for 28 days is curious considering their presale period. The iPhone did not have a presale period nor did Apple produce sufficient stock to meet demand. iPhones remained out of stock for quite a while after launch while iPads can be seen in stores already. Had Apple executed with the iPhone like it has with the iPad it's not clear there would be a difference.

    6. Re:Sheer Madness by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      So where's the camera and the GPS? Maybe we'll get that with the next update... it sucks that the iPod touch is a second-class, iPhone.

    7. Re:Sheer Madness by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      I think there's one thing you missed. Apple gets a cut of the monthly cell phone bill with AT&T. Don't get me wrong, I hate that you have to get at&t. I have a 2g with t-mobile, and will have to wait a while after the release of the 4g before I can even think of getting one. I think in the end the iPhone makes more money because they get the cut of the cell phone bill.

  24. i'm not sure it is the ipad by atarione · · Score: 1

    i like netbooks my little aspire one has traveled thousands of miles with me and have been nice to have
    the problem is it is two years old and for the most part a brand new netbook wouldn't necessarily be compellingly better than my 2yr old A110.

    I'd have to think that a big part of the sales drop is that all the people that see the benefit of a little netbook have one now and also don't have any hugely compelling reason to buy a shinny new one to replace the one they have.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:i'm not sure it is the ipad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use punctuation you fucking idiot. It's not for your convenience, it's for ours.

  25. 641 by random+string+of+num · · Score: 5, Insightful

    641% wow man.. thats a lot of growth, if they could keep that up the number of netbooks in the market doubles roughly every month, it would only take just under 3 years for the entire population of the world to have a net-book (starting with 1 net-book at the 1st month) isn't it more likely that the net book market has saturated itself. I find it hard to understand how people can compare these two different product types, these tablets don't even have keyboards, and cost at least 2wice as much. enough already with this apple out to conquer the world hogwash don't believe the hype

    1. Re:641 by Altus · · Score: 1

      There are some people who buy a netbook and use it as their primary machine. These people will not buy an iPad. But if you were looking at a netbook to supplement your desktop (which I think a lot of people do) then the iPad is a direct competitor because you are buying the netbook for portability and probably mostly media consumption and internet surfing which the iPad is quite good at.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  26. Re:How will Slashdotters cope with being wrong? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Slashdotters are never wrong... the universe is.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  27. Re:How will Slashdotters cope with being wrong? by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

    Being wrong about what? They have the exact same specs and operate in exactly the same way they were projected when everyone decided they were crap.

    You can sell a billion turds and they're still turds.

  28. As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by nweaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An iPad is really a "new class" of device: a "content access" tool rather than a "content creation" tool. A notebook is really good for creating stuff. But for viewing stuff, its actually decidedly second-class.

    And netbooks are just small notebooks: with all the limitations that a notebook has.

    An iPad is different: it actually sucks for creating content for the most part: the keyboard just is a steaming pile of "not good" compared with even the keyboard on the XO laptop. But for data access it is brilliant: Light weight, long lived, easy to use.

    And with the app ecology, apps are just more "data to access", and its really good at that. I'd expect to see, eg, a lot of interesting industrial/business applications as well start to develop. Its not just a "for fun" device really, its just a reflection that there are different roles for devices, and apple built a specialist-in-a-different direction device.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ, the keyboard is quite usable. The only problem I consistently have is that whenever I try to hit the spacebar it hits the b key. Just takes a little retraining. I can almost type on it without looking down at the keyboard after a couple weeks of inconsistent usage.

    2. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      long lived

      And you're basing this on what? The few months it's been out?

    3. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An iPad is really a "new class" of device: a "content access" tool rather than a "content creation" tool

      I've been trying to eloquently describe the Ipad to my wife, i think your description is the best one I've read so far. I could never describe to people how the Ipad is not a replacement for your laptop but that it's a replacement for your laptop hah. I think "content access tool' vs "content creation tool" sums it up perfectly.

    4. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um....Netbooks are content creation tools? Good lord...I would never try to edit video on a Netbook. Mix music? How many DSP plugins do you think a Netbook can handle when editing audio?

      Netbook a content creation device? Please...

    5. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by dfghjk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "But for viewing stuff, its actually decidedly second-class."

      How so? In what ways is the iPad "first-class" in comparison?

      "...with all the limitations that a notebook has."

      None of which you have enumerated.

      "But for data access it is brilliant: Light weight, long lived, easy to use."

      Why is it brilliant for data access? In what ways does it help a user use "data" better than existing devices? Is it really easier to use than a notebook, say an Apple notebook? I don't agree. You are aware of the iPad's poor ergonomics for longer term use, right?

      "apps are just more "data to access"..."

      No they aren't, and apps are censored by Apple meaning there will be fewer than there otherwise would be. Sorry, that's another disadvantage.

      "I'd expect to see, eg, a lot of interesting industrial/business applications as well start to develop."

      Perhaps, but that doesn't make the iPad a "new class" of device. Tablets for vertical markets have been successful for more than a decade already.

      Sorry, but you are ignorant.

    6. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      He meant battery life.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    7. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by trboyden · · Score: 1

      There is nothing new about a device designed to lock you in to one provider's content platform. See Nintendo Gameboy, Sony PSP, etc...

    8. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Graff · · Score: 1

      Netbooks are content creation tools? Good lord...I would never try to edit video on a Netbook. Mix music? How many DSP plugins do you think a Netbook can handle when editing audio?

      Text can also be content, although text editing on a tiny netbook screen can be a pain too. I'd agree that netbooks are barely content creation devices, they are convenient to carry, read some e-mails, surf the web, maybe do a little writing but they really aren't that great at any of it.

      The iPad is much more portable and easy to handle than a netbook, performs better on content consumption and almost as well on content creation. This is the reason the iPad is selling so well.

    9. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      An iPad is really a "new class" of device: a "content access" tool rather than a "content creation" tool.

      It's not new; it's a PADD (even the name is almost the same). The only surprising thing is that it took this long to actually build a decent one!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      A lot of people still cannot see beyond: if the device cannot do this, this and that...etc., it's not good enough!! Well, iPad is not, and never meant to be a general purpose computer.

    11. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      An iPad is really a "new class" of device: a "content access" tool rather than a "content creation" tool

      I wouldn't exactly call it new. It's basically a rehash of the Internet appliance concept for a more mature market that is more ready to accept it and its more compelling use case.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    12. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree with nweaver. As a programmer, I demand a large screen so that I can have windows, IDEs, etc. open while I'm developing software. But when I do pure web browsing, I don't need that much real estate and most of my interaction is done with a mouse. I realized this when my 23-inch screen died and I grabbed an old 17-inch LCD. It was good enough for browsing.

      An iPad like device would be great provided I can add any application or document without buying it through a store of some kind but I'll wait for someone else to create a clone. Until then it will be a real battle to refrain from buying one. That being said, you really have to give Apple credit for doing it right. How many tablet P.C.s out there are as useful as an iPad? I haven't seem many people use them for more than just the novelty of having a tablet pc.

    13. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, and I thought it was just a really big iPod Touch with all the limitations that an iPod has, not a new class of anything.

    14. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by sjbe · · Score: 1

      And netbooks are just small notebooks: with all the limitations that a notebook has.

      True but that's a glass half empty way of stating it. They also are small notebooks with most/all of the advantages a notebook has. Not the least of which is a built in keyboard. If your work habits are like mine, a keyboard is not a minor issue.

    15. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that you get it. So few do.

      I would say that the iPad can be good for creating as well. Backed by a strong computer on a network, the iPad can be a great front end, remote control, manipulator of data. It needs time to mature, but it's there. I would say that alone blurs the line of creation.

      I'd also argue that notebooks tend to slack in creation, on average. There are a number of power house notebooks out there but I'd argue that for every notebook, there's a desktop that outclasses it by light years. I predict with more of these kinds of devices on the market and with more people understanding how to separate their interface from their workhorse, notebooks will become niche products again for people willing to make computing compromises, you'll see a resurgence of desktops at home, particularly as "headless" devices (maybe moreso to the point of blending into the entertainment center) and the tablets/slates as the every day device people use to navigate data and views.

      Really, this is just an extension of the MVC concept that REAL DEVELOPERS understand and why they get the iPad.

    16. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1

      "But for viewing stuff, its actually decidedly second-class." How so? In what ways is the iPad "first-class" in comparison?

      The iPad has a bigger screen than many netbooks and the fact that it is a touchscreen that allows very "natural" manipulation of the stuff you view, makes it far superior in usability, much more pleasant to use.
      I don't know, some people just ought to try one for a bit and try to be neutral about it. ;-)

      --
      "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    17. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      It seems like it would be better to compare against a kindle or some other e-reader than a netbook.

      The iPad has advantages and disadvantages over the netbook. It has vibrant color, but that comes with glare. In particular, I think once color e-ink screens become ubiquitous, the iPad will lose most of its advantages.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    18. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by chocomilko · · Score: 1

      the keyboard just is a steaming pile of "not good" compared with even the keyboard on the XO laptop.

      As someone WITH an XO laptop, I beg to differ.

  29. there was a price war, now there are a few models by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. I wonder if there's some connection there?

  30. Or people realize netbooks are retarded by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its also entirely possible that people have begun to realize that netbooks are just annoying.

    Too small for long term use, too large for stuffing in your pocket or a small purse, battery life no better than my MBP for the same tasks and utterly incapable of doing the same things. Not useful as a phone.

    Netbooks were a cute fad but lets face it, they aren't really useful to most people and it took people a little bit to realize it.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 0, Insightful

      battery power DOES matter on netbooks. on 3cell batts (the cheap ones) you get 2-3 hours. on my larger notebook, only the 6cell batt even comes close to that.

      my 6cell on my netbook is close to 5hours. find me a notebook that can truly run for that long and I'll agree with you.

      if I'm going on a trip (plane) there is NO WAY I'd take a larger notebook over a netbook!

      netbooks DO have a reason to exist. they ARE a lot smaller and that often makes enough diff to justify the screen size being so small.

      I also worry a lot less about my $175 netbook getting destroyed in travel than my $500+ notebook.

      MANY reasons for why netbooks still have a place in the computing world. they're far from dead even though they are getting closer to proper notebooks in cpu power.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by shaunbr · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If I'm laying on the couch and I want to surf the web, I don't want to have to awkwardly hold a netbook and fight with a tiny trackpad or awkwardly type into it using a keyboard that's too small to use comfortably. On top of that, I have to deal with the performance issues from trying to run Windows on a low end Atom processor, and I still need to be close to a power outlet since the battery life of the average netbook isn't much better than a normal laptop.

      I don't own an iPad and I'm not planning to buy one, but I do own a netbook, and it sits around gathering dust -- if I need to use a serious computer, I bring my laptop with me, and if I want to browse the web on my couch, I use my phone. As much as Apple haters like to deny it, there *is* a market for tablets with 'watered down' interfaces like the iPad (or presumably any of the Android tablets that will eventually hit the market).

    3. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't actually need portables. Laptops are typically just ferried from table top to table top.

    4. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      battery power DOES matter on netbooks. on 3cell batts (the cheap ones) you get 2-3 hours. on my larger notebook, only the 6cell batt even comes close to that.

      my 6cell on my netbook is close to 5hours. find me a notebook that can truly run for that long and I'll agree with you.

      if I'm going on a trip (plane) there is NO WAY I'd take a larger notebook over a netbook!

      netbooks DO have a reason to exist. they ARE a lot smaller and that often makes enough diff to justify the screen size being so small.

      I also worry a lot less about my $175 netbook getting destroyed in travel than my $500+ notebook.

      MANY reasons for why netbooks still have a place in the computing world. they're far from dead even though they are getting closer to proper notebooks in cpu power.

      The sub-notebook class always seemed a better idea. Prices on the X series Thinkpads are not at all bad, and they used to be LIGHTER, faster, larger screens, than current netbooks (yes, probably 2x the cost after various discounts of course)

    5. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Where you talking about a netbook or an iPad? Too small for long term use, too large to stuff in your pocket, not useful as a phone, utterly incapable doing the same things as a laptop. All true of the iPad. Sure battery life is a feature but is it better than today's Macbooks (up to 10 hours according to Apple) or many netbooks? Hard to say.

      iPads are a cute fad but lets face it, they aren't really useful to most people and it will take people a little bit to realize it.

      The Macbook Air was a cute fad but lets face it, it wasn't really useful to most people and it took people a little bit to realize it.

    6. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The screen & keyboard on my iPad is MUCH better than my netbook's. Battery life's also better. It IS a little too big for the road, but it's much easier to carry around the house than the netbook. And most of what I'd use a netbook for, I can also do on the iPad.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by drew30319 · · Score: 1

      Its also entirely possible that people have begun to realize that netbooks are just annoying. Too small for long term use, too large for stuffing in your pocket or a small purse, battery life no better than my MBP for the same tasks and utterly incapable of doing the same things. Not useful as a phone. Netbooks were a cute fad but lets face it, they aren't really useful to most people and it took people a little bit to realize it.

      I've read several comments like this and am surprised that so many people really don't see the use for a netbook. Although I have both a home-brew desktop and a VAIO laptop the computer I use most often is my Eee 1000HE. I'm in law school and couldn't bring my VAIO on the days that I had to take more than 3 case books to school - it simply wouldn't fit in my bag. In Europe last Summer my fellow law students were out of luck when we were visiting other law schools which didn't have power outlets in the lecture halls; after a couple of hours their laptops had died while my battery chugged along for 8+ hours. Likewise on our ridiculously long bus trips from Austria to Venice & Venice to Dubrovnik I had a media player that outlasted their iPods when watching video.

      Am I the only person who would much rather type than use a touchscreen? Don't other people want something that can be folded in half to protect the screen? Obviously this is just the experience of one law student. But I can't be the only person that thinks that the size, performance, and price are a good fit.

      More power to Apple if they can sell the heck outta these things but I don't think I'm the only person who has a netbook that perfectly fits their needs.

      --
      JAGga.me ----> Producing video games addressing emotional health and wellness issues affecting teens.
    8. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      From someone that just watched a TV show and wrote an article at the same time on the bus today with his netbook, you suck.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:Or people realize netbooks are retarded by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Not been a fan of netbook myself, but one thing they have given rise to is a rash of decently powered full fledged 11" laptops such as the Toshiba T110 and the Acer Timeline 1810TZ - both of which get 8-9hrs of battery life when doing light web stuff, and much lighter than the classic 14" laptop whilst still plenty big enough for "proper" work (keyboards are comfortable enough to write on for extended periods, and I have reasonably big hands). Laptops in these form factors were almost unheard of in any large numbers, especially after the death of the awesome 11" G4 Macbook.

      As someone who tends to read and write on the move, I'm not the iPad's target market, but I still have to thank the netbook for getting reasonably small form factors back in the zeitgeist.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  31. So now that the product is proven by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Who out there has got a dual core tegra tablet for $600 or less? Anyone? Bueller? How about one of those ARM tablets for $100? Hello? *taptap* Is this thing on? Something I can buy with US currency and have shipped to the continental US, please.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:So now that the product is proven by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      Archos home Tablet 7 is released next month.

      $200. 7" WVGA screen with a 600mhz ARM9 Cortex 160gb hdd.

      There have been a handfull of $600-ish Atom based tablets but they generally suffer from a 2.5 hour battery life.

  32. Hype-Cycle by prefec2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First there was no such device as a netbook. Then the geeks saw the OLPC and then they ran around, screaming "I want one of these!!!!" After some screaming, Asus thought it might be nice to sell some of these devices to geeks. Hey its about money. And then more people saw that netbooks are nice devices so they bought one. As the demand for netbooks was high the sales jumped up (because the industry suddenly provided a portable product which was very much needed by many people). Now most of those people who want a netbook have a netbook and so the sales are going back. Also there was/is a financial crisis going on. And while the crisis more or less hit the public in the US very quickly it took some time to have an affect countries with "social backup systems".

    So in short: It is not a falling of a cliff it is just the end of a peak. And yes, as already mentioned, there are no really cheap netbooks anymore.

    1. Re:Hype-Cycle by geekoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "First there was no such device as a netbook. "

      Of course there was. You're being an imbecilic and pedantic Irritation. . They where purchased be a fuck load of non geeks. They are perfect for kids and school. They are great for the majority of users, and they were inexpensive.

      Sadly, the manufactures were pressured by resellers to make them bigger so that could make more money with the profit margin. This bumped the price up from 199.99 to 299.99 and up. The surpassed their price point.

      I'm costco was selling them like hot cakes. Costco is less geek mecca and more 30 something family shopper mecca.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Hype-Cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First there was no such device as a netbook. "

      Of course there was. You're being an imbecilic and pedantic Irritation.

      Did you read the damn post? He was describing the timeline of netbooks. That was setting the scene. I.E. the timeline starts when netbooks dont exist. THEN comes the OLPC. THEN comes the Asus eeePC.

      Please do yourself a favour and read what you're replying to before acting like a retarded prick.

    3. Re:Hype-Cycle by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Netbooks came into existence BECAUSE they were inexpensive, there was no "AND". A "netbook" was an inexpensive, no-frills notebook and was not different in any other way. Your argument boils down to nothing more than one over the word itself, you you call someone else pedantic.

      The fact that netbooks can come and go as device category is proof that there is no netbook distinct from a notebook.

    4. Re:Hype-Cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... you missed the OP's point - *at one time* there was no such device as a netbook, then came the OLPC, then came geek demand, then came netbooks.

    5. Re:Hype-Cycle by JohnnyDoh · · Score: 0

      No cheap netbooks? The original Eee PC 701 sold for $399 retail. I just bought my wife the Eee PC 1001P for $279.

    6. Re:Hype-Cycle by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      First there was no such device as a netbook.

      Sure there was! You just had to import it from Japan and pay $2000 for it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Hype-Cycle by joh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Netbooks came into existence BECAUSE they were inexpensive, there was no "AND". A "netbook" was an inexpensive, no-frills notebook and was not different in any other way.

      Except that they ran Linux instead of Windows and had small SSDs instead of HDs. Which was the reason they were called "netbooks" -- not enough HD space to store much data and just a handful of apps mainly to access the net. Appliances instead of computers. *That* was the original netbook. If you really think the original EeePC was just a small laptop you've never used one.

      I find it interesting that people have forgotten that already. Now the iPad comes along, does what netbooks tried to do and everyone is wondering why people buy such a thing... In fact the iPad is closer to the original netbook idea than any netbook you can buy today.

    8. Re:Hype-Cycle by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Young padawan there was a time where there were no netbooks. Not even laptops or computers. but we seem to have different definitions of netbook. My definition is: A netbook is a small mobile computer around A5 in size for under 400 EUR. If the thingy is more expensive it becomes a subnetbook. And if it is bigger it is a laptop. With one exception: Pads are also small mobile computers, but they are not netbooks.

  33. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news...

    The phenomenon in our universe known as "time" is causing an explosion of iPad sales. Scientists found that, as time increases from the release of the iPad, more iPads are sold. Therefore, time is causing iPad sales to explode. Steve Jobs couldn't be contacted for comment, however his secretary is on record as saying "Time is a pretty cool dude. It increases our sales and isn't afraid of anything!"

  34. Predicted last year by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or maybe netbook sales are cratering because instead of delivering quality models with high performance and low power packed into a lightweight enclosure, companies like Dell have axed all but the most profitable models, and replaced SSDs with magnetic disks and raised prices to the maximum they can squeeze out of customers. Netbook selection is terrible now compared to what it was a year ago. Last year there were many models and there was a price war, now there are a few models and they're just crappy low-end notebooks.

    Indeed, at least one study in late 2009 predicted that Netbooks would fall off of their own accord
    http://www.internetnews.com/stats/article.php/3855261/Netbook-Sales-to-Cool-Off-in-2010.htm

    That was a month before the iPad was announced.

    1. Re:Predicted last year by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      well.. and there was at least one poster too
      I think the same thing for tablets, including the iPaidalot. Niche product, limited uses. And in Apples, case, over priced too. The cool/wow factor will last a little while but once that group moves on, back to earth. I'd venture iPad benefits too from the perception of an improving economy as pent up gadget demand is released by those who have a little dough or credit line available.

  35. That problem is hardly unique to Apple... by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not particularly an iPad fan here, but still... every technology product has this issue. I think most people understand the tradeoff between having something now and having something slightly more whiz-bang later.

  36. Arrgh by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Magic? When did we go from cool technology to magic?

    Everyone is going to be disappointed in a year when the market is full of better devices.

    like this one:
    http://wepad.mobi/en

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Arrgh by JazzyJ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently Apple's 'technology' has become sufficiently advanced to have become 'magic' to us mere mortals. :)

  37. Just bought a netbook by Geeky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I just bought a Samsung netbook.

    I needed a lightweight, long battery life device mainly for better browsing than a smartphone while travelling. I like to be able to type emails on a proper(ish) keyboard, same for web forums.

    I do a lot of photography and the 250GB harddrive is ideal to back up my compact flash cards and quick preview my shots - I used to use a dedicated Epson view for that.

    It has HyperSpace, which is a boot option that takes you into a cut down linux system - it boots faster, uses less battery and is therefore a handy option when all you want is to browse.

    Initial thoughts are that it's not that quick, but I also ordered a 1GB upgrade and when that arrives it should improve the Windows 7 performance (yes, Windows. Suits me. Sorry). Battery life seems good - I reckon the 11hrs quoted might be ambitious, but my experience so far says I should get 8 or 9 from normal use, including WiFi. Sticking a 3G USB dongle on will probably drain it quite a bit quicker...

    It was also under £300.

    Absolutely no reason I'd want an iPad.

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    1. Re:Just bought a netbook by andreasg · · Score: 1

      Good for you! But how does that make it any less useful for someone else with other needs than you?

  38. iPod vs. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In support of Huberty's theory, she offers a Morgan Stanley/Alphawise survey conducted in March which found that 44% of US consumers who were planning to buy an iPad said they were buying it instead of a netbook or notebook computer.

    The real question is, what are the other 56% buying it instead of?

    "Well, I was on my way to buy a giraffe, but then I walked past the Apple store..."

    1. Re:iPod vs. ? by Altus · · Score: 1

      the other 56% didn't want a netbook at all. You know, some people don't have a use for a netbook.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  39. Americans have a lot of discretionary income by Flavio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Desktop computers and laptops are designed to be workstations. The iPad was designed to be a toy, and that's how most people use it. That's how Apple markets it, and that's why people buy it.

    What Apple and Steve Jobs realised very early in the game is that Americans have a lot of money to spend on toys that look good. Even though most Americans spend their day using computers for work or entertainment, that doesn't make them geeks. They don't need significant computing power, create very little content and only use a very small set of hardware and software resources that are available to them.

    The remarkable thing is that most Americans are wealthy enough to spend $500 to buy an iPad. And even though most people could save that money and use it to buy something more useful later, they will spend it on discretionary purchases if the product is considered fashionable enough.

    1. Re:Americans have a lot of discretionary income by Altus · · Score: 1

      You say the iPad is a toy. I say it is an appliance designed for media (and internet) consumption. Now you might say that such a device is still a toy and you might convince me that your right. But that also means that my new HDTV is really nothing but a toy ( a more expensive, less versatile toy at that!). I might buy that... but then a whole lot of people are buying these toys. Maybe we shouldn't use 'toy' as a pejorative term.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    2. Re:Americans have a lot of discretionary income by Flavio · · Score: 1

      Now you might say that such a device is still a toy and you might convince me that your right. But that also means that my new HDTV is really nothing but a toy ( a more expensive, less versatile toy at that!).

      Indeed, your HDTV is also a toy. In my mind, if it's designed for entertainment, then it's essentially a toy.

      I might buy that... but then a whole lot of people are buying these toys. Maybe we shouldn't use 'toy' as a pejorative term.

      I completely agree. I have no problem with Apple selling iPads, or with the people who buy them.

    3. Re:Americans have a lot of discretionary income by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to ask what I can better spend $500 on. I am having trouble finding a savings account with worthwhile interest (even my MMA savings has shit for interest), savings bonds have pretty low rates, my stocks just plummeted, my existing gold has gone up but I don't think it is a good time to make a purchase, my real estate and lumber are both down, phosphates are down, metals are on the rise but unstable, and I still haven't figured out how I can invest in oil. What can $500 really get me in todays economy? 50k and we might be talking. 500k and there sure opportunities. But a one time $500 purchase is nothing, especially if it lasts for a while (I don't think a worthwhile TV starts below $500).

  40. There is a little spin going on here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They sold 750,000 in pre orders prior to launch, in 28 days they sold 250,000 not so impressive really.

  41. Re:How will Slashdotters cope with being wrong? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Naw I have been wrong so many times it just isn't funny,
    Apple would never go to Intel!
    The iPhone will flop because it doesn't have a removable battery or an SDK.

    But if you are never wrong you don't try hard enough.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  42. No, it wasn't the iPad .. but Steve Jobs was right by Azureflare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Netbooks just suck. That's why no one's buying them anymore. It's not because of the iPad.

    We have a hard time justifying buying an inferior tiny product that you can barely see, which can't really do that much, especially when almost everyone already has a laptop or desktop which works just fine.

    The iPad is successful with people because it provides a big huge screen which is great for lying in bed or sitting out on the patio relaxing with. While this is possible with a laptop, the iPad is much more conducive to a more relaxed environment (the ads for the thing were spot on in my opinion).

    Also it does have a longer battery life than a standard laptop. Laptops tend to chew through batteries way too fast these days.

  43. Netbooks did themselves in... by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...with help from notebooks.

    When netbooks came on the scene, they were dirt cheap. Sure, they could do less than a notebook, but, again, they were dirt cheap, they were small, and battery life was good. Just what you needed for Web browsing and light productivity work. Oh yeah, and they were dirt cheap, easily several hundred less than most notebooks except that once-in-a-blue-moon sale you might run across.

    However, this didn't last. Companies started cramming more and more into these things, which drove the price up. In and of itself, that might have been OK, but notebook prices started coming down, and they offered more features. They were bigger, but you could do more with them, and I really believe that a significantly lower price is what drove netbook sales, not merely their size. So, people could spend maybe $250-$300 for a netbook, or, if they caught a sale, they could spend $350 for a basic notebook, which offered much more bang for the buck. That's what killed netbook sales, IMHO.

    1. Re:Netbooks did themselves in... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      That's what killed my second purchase of a netbook.

      The first one was one of the early ones, I bought it, doubled the ram, added 8gb of storage with a mini-SD chip, and did all that for under $350 or so. Fast forward three years, and after dropping it, abusing it, throwing it in bags while hibernating, etc, some stuff has started to fail. Wireless doesn't work, and the track pad is having issues. I want to buy another netbook, but....

      The cheapest I can find are MSI books in the $270-$280 range, with Windows 7 starter, no SSD, and 50% larger and heavier than what I have currently. SSD options? Starting at $400.....

      Why would I blow that when full notebooks start at that price?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Netbooks did themselves in... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Nope. I don't buy it. I bought my netbook because it is small, light, and can run a full-featured OS. I wouldn't trade it for a 6 pound 15" laptop at any price. Heck, my company's about to offer a batch of recently-retired laptops to employees for free and I'm totally uninterested. Power is way down on my list of priorities for portable computing.

      If I was a developer, video editor, graphic designer, or did anything else that required heavy lifting by the CPU or GPU, obviously my needs would be different. But I use the netbook for email, surfing, word processing, remote access, etc. A netbook does all of these things just fine and fits on a seatback tray far better than any 15" (or, God forbid, 17") laptop.

      Also, I think it's misleading to say that netbooks "do less" than larger portable computers. I have Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit loaded on my netbook. Anything that runs in that environment will run on my netbook. It may not run as fast as a laptop with an i5 or i7 processor and it's certainly not practical to try to run Crysis on it but nobody with two brain cells to rub together buys a cheap netbook or notebook to run games. A $350 notebook won't handle Crysis any better than a $250 netbook. However, they'll both chug through productivity applications just fine. So why lug around an extra 4 pounds of computer?

    3. Re:Netbooks did themselves in... by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      Not to go offtopic, but if they're offering them for free, take as many as they'll give you. There are many schools, libraries, and nonprofits that would kill for a donated computer, even an older one. Or find a needy family and donate it to them. That's what a friend of mine did with an extra laptop he had, and they were most appreciative.

    4. Re:Netbooks did themselves in... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      There have always been plenty of takers among the employees and the giveaways provide a big morale boost. If we ever have a surplus of functional equipment, it'll certainly go to a non-profit. But a lot of the time the employees turn right around and give them directly to someone they know who desperately needs a computer. Much of what we give away to employees ends up with some neighbor's nephew's friend who's parents couldn't afford even the most basic eMachine.

  44. I Don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a computer scientist (software engineer degree). I need a computer everywhere I go (work + hobbies + tech addiction). The iPad seems like the worst of every world. It is a terrible laptop replacement in terms of work or school and a bad ebook reader. It is completely useless at home except to do the same basic stuff an iPhone (which I love) can do. The University I work for tried to spout the iPad as a full laptop replacement perfect for taking notes in class... Uh... Right...

    Someone please enlighten me as to why this things sells so good. Is it the "it is not a PC and different so it has to be better" paradigm? It is a sexy device but I wouldn't want to date one.

    1. Re:I Don't get it by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      It is a terrible laptop replacement

      It's not a laptop replacement. It's a device for shallow activities with a computer--an iPhone with a larger screen. Everything you love about your iPhone is applicable to the iPad, plus it's got a nicer screen. That's it.

      Someone please enlighten me as to why this things sells so good.

      Several times I've suggested to my mother that she could use a laptop in the kitchen to hold and display all her recipes and look things up if she needs to, and she refuses because there's a psychological barrier to entry with any computer that you need to know how to work the computer to get to do the easy, convenient things. The iPad, because it acts like a multi-purpose device rather than a general computing platform, eliminates that psychological barrier to entry. It makes doing things like displaying recipes and playing sudoko accessible and portable in a way that a laptop doesn't.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  45. Why would anyone want an Ipad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would somebody pay *more* for a device that can do *less*? Is it just because it has the Apple name on it and is the fad of the month? My $260 netbook can run Windows, Linux, Flash, older games, and just about anything else. What can the Ipad do?

    1. Re:Why would anyone want an Ipad? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      This seems to be the fundamental misunderstanding of a lot of geeks about the iPad: They think it's something power users will use. It's not. It's for reading books on the train/bus, it's for looking something up or checking your email while sitting on the couch watching TV, it's for playing killer sudoko with your coffee, it's for displaying a recipe in the kitchen. Much of what you're paying for is the convenient form factor and the general fit-and-finish of the device, and the rest is the fact that you can read, check email, display a recipe or play sudoko on the same device. That's it.

      Is it overpriced? Sure, for people who find it easy to do all those things and more on a netbook or a laptop. For the average consumer and user of casual computing, it's a more convenient way to do those things.

      Stop thinking of it as an overpriced netbook. It's not.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Why would anyone want an Ipad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would somebody pay *more* for a device that can do *less*?

      Because compared to a netbook - it's instant-on, it's silent, the battery lasts 10 hours, it has a better screen, it weighs less, it's more reliable, and it does everything it does quickly & seamlessly. Those aren't attributes that matter occasionally - like being able to run Photoshop - they matter all the time. It's also a breath of fresh air for the majority of people to whom a computer is an incomprehensible and slightly frightening thing.

      Some people can't see what's good about the iPad, other people can't see what's not to like.

  46. Look and Feel by savanik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A friend of mine has one that I got a chance to try out. It's an interesting little device - I'm not going to get one, but then, it's not meant for me.

    The iPad does notably excel in one simple thing that I have been missing for the past few years. It has no interface lag. My phone? When I'm switching screens, it lags for a couple seconds. My two year old laptop I got fed up with and threw out because the power jack kept breaking? Opening a directory took a noticable amount of time. Even my streamlined, power-user, performance gaming desktop has moments where its trying to access things and it chugs along before giving me any feedback.

    The iPad's interface is responsive. It does what you want it to, when you want it to. When you drag an icon around, it responds immediately. When you poke at a link, it responds instantly with feedback - the webpage might take a moment to load, but it lets you know it's heard you immediately. And everything else in the environment remains responsive. You access the dropdowns, they come right down. You hit the 'menu' button, and you don't get 'the application is waiting to close' hourglass or anything like that, you get MENU.

    I can see how that would appeal to many consumers in a world of stuttering, jerky computers.

    1. Re:Look and Feel by SpooForBrains · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and that UI responsiveness is exactly what would be lost if they opened up the software it can run to include non-approved apps, apps that can run in the background and FUCKING FLASH.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    2. Re:Look and Feel by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree; I love my Android phone (G1) but I really wish it prioritized user input response over everything else. I'll gladly sacrifice some processing power in order to ensure that it always responds to my UI actions immediately.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Look and Feel by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Thank you, great reply. It's sad (and funny) when geek trashs Ipod Touch and now the Ipad comparing it to for instance Nokia N900 which runs a full Linux ARM distro. You know, you are not gonna impress me by having a full distro on a N900 size device, I've seen full distros running on devices only slighly larger than a quarter and even that is not impressive anymore. Any second year student should be able to have Linux running on anything within a month given hardware specs. What is impressive is not cramming features into a device with laggy and unintuitive interface. but the opposite - carefully choosing a nice subset of features and polishing it to near perfection. And this is what Apple has done with the IPod Touch interface, it is more responsive than any Windows or Linux GUI I have tried, on a quad core with 4 gigs of RAM. Only BEOS could compare to it.

      This is actually a particular case of a more general problem with certain programmer's mindset. They believe that giving the users more features and more options is enabling the user, but actually it is quite the opposite - when there are tweny ways to do the same thing it is a sign of mental lazyness of the developer who could not pick the best way to do something and just shifted this responsibility to the user.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  47. Article is on crack by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They show a chart that lists declines in Netbook YoY growth from July of 2009, and cite the iPad as being the reason why. The iPad wasn't even ANNOUNCED until January of 2010.

    The chart doesn't list netbook sales, but rather the rate of growth over the last year. You'll note that netbook sales still have positive growth.

    So despite the fact there was this sudden MASSIVE surge to buy netbooks in the past two years, netbook sales continue to grow. But the growth rate of that surge did not continue upward. And even though the decline started six months before anyone had heard of an iPad, clearly this is all about the iPad.

    Bull-fucking-shit. But nice try.

    That being said, I'd buy an iPad at $200. For $300 or more, I expect more PC-like functioanlity and would prefer a netbook. In fact, Asus makes a nice convertible netbook/tablet that is cheaper than the iPad, has 10 times the storage, a faster processer, a webcam, I can install whatever software I want, it runs Flash, has more RAM, has a full keyboard built-in when I want it, etc. etc. etc.

    If I can get that at $450, why would I want to spend so much more for far less functionality?

    Oh, the i-before the name!

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Article is on crack by Graff · · Score: 1

      For $300 or more, I expect more PC-like functioanlity and would prefer a netbook. In fact, Asus makes a nice convertible netbook/tablet that is cheaper than the iPad, has 10 times the storage, a faster processer, a webcam, I can install whatever software I want, it runs Flash, has more RAM, has a full keyboard built-in when I want it, etc. etc. etc.

      If I can get that at $450, why would I want to spend so much more for far less functionality?

      Netbooks are also more bulky, heavier, less battery life, lower resolution screen, don't have a GPS or compass, and usually have a worse UI for simple tasks like content consumption.

      It's not that the iPad has less functionality than a netbook, it's that it has DIFFERENT functionality than a netbook. Perhaps you don't fit the target demographic for an iPad but there are obviously a ton of people who feel differently. The iPad is selling like crazy and netbooks have been falling off. Maybe the two aren't directly related but one thing is for sure: the masses like the iPad.

    2. Re:Article is on crack by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The $450 Asus model I referenced has a higher resolution, is very light, and claims almost the exact same battery life.

      The iPhone/iPad UI isn't perfect for every task either.

      The Asus convertible allows you to use multi-touch when you want to, or keyboard/mouse when you want to. So the interface is better as well.

      You insist the iPad doesn't have less functionality than a netbook, except the netbook I'm talking about has all the functionality of the iPad (save for GPS - compass is a subset of the GPS), with tons of additional functionality.

      Three of my coworkers have an iPad. They've brought them into work to show off, but all say they have no intention of carrying it around. So the GPS is useless. It is a device to use largely on your couch. The only advantage the device has is worthless.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Article is on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In fact, Asus makes a nice convertible netbook/tablet that is cheaper than the iPad, has 10 times the storage, a faster processer, a webcam, I can install whatever software I want, it runs Flash, has more RAM, has a full keyboard built-in when I want it, etc. etc. etc.

      If I can get that at $450, why would I want to spend so much more for far less functionality?

      Oh, the i-before the name!

      I have used an asus 100he for a little over a year and love it. I have been wanting an e-reader for a while but the limitations on them and the ipad made me look elsewhere. I got an Asus t91mt netpad for less than $500. Its got a 8.9" screen, 32gig ssd & 2gig of ram and runs Win7 (quite well after a lot of tweaking). Plugged into an external monitor at work with a bluetooth keyboard and mouse it replaced my 1000he (which replaced my destop) just fine. It surf the web, OpenOffice runs like a champ, VLC plays video and Adobe Reader lets me read book. Have not tried Kindle for the PC yet.

    4. Re:Article is on crack by Graff · · Score: 1

      he $450 Asus model I referenced has a higher resolution, is very light, and claims almost the exact same battery life.

      Asus Eee PC T91, around $450 online:
      8.9" diagonal LED panel
      1,024x600 resolution, works out to about 133 pixels per inch (ppi)
      8.86" (W) x 6.46" (D) x 0.99" ~ 1.12" (H)
      2.1 lb
      up to 5 hours battery life

      iPad Wi-Fi, $499 online:
      9.7" diagonal LED panel
      1,024x768 resolution at 132 pixels per inch (ppi)
      9.56" (W) x 7.47" (D) x 0.5" (H)
      1.5 pounds
      up to 10 hours battery life

      The iPad is a bit wider and taller but significantly thinner, lighter, and about twice the battery life. When you're talking about a device that has a main selling point of ease to carry I'd say that the award goes to the iPad.

      By the way, you can also use a mouse and keyboard with the iPad, as well as the multi-touch.

      Like I said, different devices for different targets. If you want a bullet-proof device that really never needs any antivirus or fiddling around with cleanup software and has a simple UI then the iPad is for you. If you want a device that is thicker and heavier but allows a bit more flexibility along with more need for maintenance then maybe a netbook is your device. Neither one is better than the other, overall, just a different focus.

    5. Re:Article is on crack by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The Asus convertible allows you to use multi-touch when you want to, or keyboard/mouse when you want to. So the interface is better as well.

      That's such a nonsensical statement. Just because you can change modes, doesn't make an interface automatically "better." Also, the iPad supports a keyboard, so you can do the exact same thing.

      But the real question is - what is the quality of the touch interface, how well is it designed, what's the usability like? About the only other options out there at the moment are Windows 7 and Android, and I think most people would agree that they aren't as nice as touch interfaces as iPhone OS.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  48. Price is another problem by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Back when netbooks where priced as low as possible, the choice simply would have been a no-brainer.

    The problem is that the various Netbooks producers, instead of trying to build even cheaper device with reasonable characteristics, are going the other way around :
    the current market looks like a big shoot-out of who is going to pack as much features as possible (including, ironically, the biggest screen possible) into their Netbook.
    Thus their devices start looking even less like cheap Web-surfing/Chatting/E-Mailing machines and even more like diminutive notebooks, and the price suffers.

    So now, the biggest target crowd, people who just want to Surf and E-Mail (but not chat. Sorry no true 3rd-party multitasking sanctioned by Saint-Jobs) have the choice between either a diminutive notebook which is too expensive and packs a lot of useless (for them) functions, or another, also too expensive device, but strongly marketed with a really "cool image" associated with it.
    The only difference - that matters to the target crowd and that is immediately visible - between the two is the shiny factor, so they'll go for the iPad.

    What the Netbook constructors should have done is stick to the magic Lower power + Linux + Really Cheap formula.

    Thankfully, with the arrival of newer non-Intel netbook platforms (OMAP4, Nvidia Tegra, etc...) the winds might change again, with a new crop of machines which do everything the basic users want (Surf+Email) and even more (background chat, other background tasks, advanced usage possible for advanced users who care), and cost a fraction of what the iPad cost.

    a walled garden can never replace a notebook. we all know that!

    The problem is that this is an argument that the random "surf-only" user doesn't understand. At least not until much later, when she/he would like to have MSN, Skype, and a couple of other chats running into the background while reading e-books. And by then it's too late, money has shift into Apple's pocket since very long.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  49. This surprises me.. by jcr · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd thought that Netbooks had a rather limited appeal, but that they'd continue to sell to the customers who fit that niche. I was expecting the iPad to sell to a much wider group of users, though.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  50. It could be good for the netbook market by nick_davison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Discussing this one in the office, the esteemed Kevin Thompson said,

    "It could be good for the netbook market when all of those people buy an iPad and realize they can't do [expletive] go and buy a netbook to replace it."

    Apple's training users to appreciate a convenience size... yet almost completely failing to provide for content production as well as content consumption.

    The quoted Morgan Stanley figures say 44% are buying an iPad instead of. That's 56% who aren't, who wouldn't be buying anything else. Many users will stay with Apple... but how many users have Apple converted to the size of ultra portables yet let down enough on content production that they'll move back in to, and enlarge, the general netbook market?

    1. Re:It could be good for the netbook market by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your assumption only holds true if end users expect the same out of the iPad that they would out of a netbook or notebook. I believe that the different form factor may cause a large percentage of buyers to separate the two into different categories. If people don't expect to be able to use an iPad (Or any other similar tablet device for that matter.) in the same way that they would use a notebook, they won't buy the netbook.

      The majority of people in the world are consumers, not creators, and tablet devices provide a definite edge in terms of consumption. Tablet devices can handle the content creation in a pinch, but for any serious work I think most people would prefer a large notebook or a desktop over a netbook anyhow. Consumption ability on tablets is superior to netbooks and the creation ability on netbooks isn't honestly all that great compared to a notebook or a desktop. My own personal belief is that the iPad hasn't killed netbook sales so much as consumers have realized that netbooks aren't providing the experience that they were expecting. Any convenience factor they may have had has been largely eroded by tablet devices.

      The only argument that really exists is that the iPad limits the software that can be installed. This argument against tablet devices disappears once Android tablets start hitting the market later this year. They won't have the same restrictions and multiple manufacturers will be able to compete on price, providing more affordable alternatives to the iPad. The netbook is rapidly becoming irrelevant.

  51. pads in 28 days? by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Funny

    My wife goes through some pads every 28 days, but never a million of them.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:pads in 28 days? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      Why is this funny, these jokes are over. People, please, I implore you to mod this crap down.

  52. Re:How will Slashdotters cope with being wrong? by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hey lookit! I was right :O

  53. I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by LuYu · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While the iPad may have been a nail in the coffin, the death of netbooks has been obviously on the horizon since MS changed its tune and began to "support" them (MS support == embrace, extend, and extinguish). When the first EEEPC came out, it was a cool device: SSD storage, lightweight, better than average (for laptops) battery life, and it could fit in a fashionable woman's purse. These devices were extremely useful for science, diagnostic testing, playing, reading, etcetera -- in fact, these were the first real instance of mobile computing. Laptops were bulky, expensive, ran hot, and had terrible batteries. The first year of netbooks was somewhat of a golden age.

    Enter M$. Now, what do netbooks look like? I checked last week, and it is now impossible to buy a netbook without a spinning platter hard drive. Linux netbooks are almost completely unavailable. I checked Amazon and Newegg. Both listed Linux netbooks that were "no longer available". The available netbooks are no longer much lighter or more convenient than traditonal laptops. In fact, battery life is about the only selling point they have left.

    I figure it was just a matter of time before the public came to realize that netbooks are just about the same as laptops now, so they have to go somewhere else to search for convenient mobile devices. The fact that so many people are rushing to the iPad is just more proof that Steve Jobs -- bastard that he is -- is a genius at predicting the right time and climate to release a product. Just as people are fed up with MS ruining the very concept of the netbook, we have the iPad: long battery life, nice screen, hardware accelerated video, light and portable, all the things that MS has taken away from the netbook.

    While anyone who buys Apple products is still a jerk, I think MS owes the hardware manufacturers and the public an apology for destroying a lucrative sector of the market and a useful product for people to use. Unfortunately, running to Apple is not an unreasonable choice. This just proves the harm that comes from monopolies being allowed to exist.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a completely misinformed knee-jerk bash at MS.

      Thanks for proving that Slashdot still doesn't have jack on legitimate tech sites. I find myself coming here less and less all the time and I'm starting to think it's about time to put this one to bed.

    2. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by westlake · · Score: 1
      Linux netbooks are almost completely unavailable.

      Product that doesn't sell even at the WalMart deep discount price isn't kept in stock.

    3. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by Trelane · · Score: 1

      System76 and ZaReason still sell Linux netbooks (in fact, that's all they sell are linux pre-installed). And Dell I think still has a Linux netbook. I think this is US; globally netbooks are still about a third of all sales.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    4. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Yep. I posted pretty much the same above. I was trying to replace a 3 year old netbook, but the best I can do for the same price is 50% larger and heavier, with Windows 7 starter, and a spinning drive. Those were 3 things I specifically chose NOT to have when I bought my previous netbook. (Well, it might have been Vista crippled edition then, but you get the drift.)

      What I wanted, and got 3 years ago doesn't exist now. And worse, BETTER than that also doesn't exist. The netbook marketplace no longer exists, I guess.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a fucking joke right?

      You can still get SSDs, they simply cost more.
      What has killed the netbook is the fact that a 7 inch netbook is unusable, and a 10 inch netbook only costs ~$100 than a 13-15 inch laptop with superior specs.
      Turns out a device needs to be useful, and a 7inch windows or linux netbook simply isn't that useful for most people.

      But hey, blame "M$".

      People are starting to realize that the desktop doesn't translate terribly well to mobile/touchscreen devices.
      I doubt that cramming a mobile phone OS will be much better. I'd like to see a middleground. The Courier was a cool concept, but a dual screened high mobility device with those kinds of features would need a fast processor, a huge battery for it and the 2 screens,and a huge cost.

      Give me a "Tablet OS" that's actually designed to be a full featured PC in a slab format and I will be happy.

    6. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like a problem with people not wanting Linux. Oh, that's right... when people don't want Linux it's because MS has a choke hold on computers. Riiiigggghhhhhtttttt.

      Linux sucks a turd. It's a fact. Get over it, fanboi.

    7. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by narcc · · Score: 1

      My wife runs Ubuntu on her netbook. She loves it. So much so, in fact, she never touches her windows laptop.

      The only thing she didn't like as being unable to watch netflix movies. Now that she has the netflix disc for her wii, she doesn't care. (It turns out that she didn't really want to watch movies on her computer, she just wanted to watch movies.)

      Now that I'm thinking about it, I know a few non-technical users who use linux exclusively without issue.

      It makes me wonder, is it linux that isn't ready, or are manufacturer just afraid to take the risk?

    8. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      The linux netbook was instrumental in the success of the iPad, it demonstrated the willingness of the consumer to purchase a non-standard OS.

      Microsoft understood this and that's why they subverted it as quickly as they could.

      It's a shame though that linux did not ultimately take off in such great success on those devices, but it's easy to see why. Everyone wanted their own distro and everyone wanted to lock it down in different ways.

    9. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely: The manufacturers are just scared to death of the possibility of angering MS. This is just the same as OEMs being afraid of Intel. Once, I was at COMPUTEX, and the CEO of a huge tech company will not name would not allow me to take a picture of him in front of his own AMD display for fear of the wrath of Intel.

      MS just does not allow sales of other OSes.

      As for the user friendliness of Ubuntu, in my experience, most Windows users tend not to notice they are not using MS software when they use it. In fact, the only time they seem to notice is when they try to run an .exe file.

    10. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by LuYu · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they are about twice the price of netbooks on Amazon, and they have spinning platter drives. They are not available to the public in the sense that nobody that does not regularly deal with Linux would know about those. MS successfully eliminated the Linux netbook from the mass market.

      When I bought my EEE901, I predicted that this would happen, and it was exactly as I predicted. Unfortunately, I did not buy more than one. I regret that more and more every day.

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    11. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by Trelane · · Score: 1

      the ZaReason netbooks can come with an ssd. And they look about the same price as the netbooks on Amazon that I'm seeing for a quick search. Got links?

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    12. Re:I Doubt It Is Only the iPad by LuYu · · Score: 1

      It does not matter if people want Linux or not. People are supposed to have a choice in a Free Market. It was what the 1776 Revolution was fought for and why you call your government a "democracy" today: Free choice. When MS removes all choice from the market by putting pressure on OEMs to, for instance, not sell computers without operating systems or forcing OEMs to place signs near all an OEM's public displays saying, "It's always better with Windows!", MS is abusing its monopoly power.

      You are probably a troll, but for the record, I am not so much a fan of Linux as I am an incensed victim of M$. Microsoft has violated every law a software company can, and the legal things they have done have been equally immoral. They hate liberty, individuality, and free choice. They thumb their noses at the government and bribe crooked public officials, like the US's last president ("campaign contributions" -- that anti-trust lawsuit sure went away quickly, did it not?). They advocate central control of information and ownership of all ideas by large corporations (All your base...). They spy on users (WGA anyone?). They appear to have initiated frivolous lawsuits and abused the court system (one word: SCO). They are enemies of the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and Human Rights the world over (DRM supports third party invasion of your private computer and limits your ability to speak freely online).

      If there were more choices than Linux out there, I would most likely experiment with them. I would love to see Haiku actually work (BeOS was another unfortunate victim of MS's OEM manipulation). However, as things stand, there are few Free choices in the software world. Macs are controlled by a company that has a worse track record for vendor lock in (To Jobs, "free" means "free to buy more Apple products"). The mobile world is full of non-free operating systems. Even Android is more of an assault on Freedom than support for it.

      So, you tell me, how can I in good conscience support an amoral, law-breaking, malicious software company just because the general public is ignorant of that company's behavior? Is following the crowd so important that I have to give up all of my morals?

      I am a fanboi. I am a Freedom fanboi. I believe in the Constitution, human rights, and Liberty -- especially Free Speech. Why should I financially support the enemies of these concepts? Further, why do you?

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  54. I wish I had a use for it by asoduk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It is rather sad that there have already been over 1,000,000 people who either: a) will buy whatever apple puts in their stores or have to have the latest trendy product or b) apparently don't do anything of value with a computer I really can't think of any reason to have a computer without a keyboard other than a POS terminal, especially one that can't do Flash. I have an older Acer netbook. Its great for some things: like traveling, using at on-site jobs, for music on my patio, in the kitchen, etc. Its great for web browsing and checking e-mail. And I could install iTunes on it... Oh yeah: I paid $230 for mine over a year ago. I have used it for work and pleasure. Ipad is just a toy for a while..... but I can see useful applications for it if Apple allows it.

  55. Re:Whatever it takes! by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Well, since iPads don't use IBM hard drives, pixie dust won't help.

    Unless you think Jobs is actually growing iPads, in which case pixie dust might work there, too. Or not...

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  56. correlationisnotcausation indeed... by dvoecks · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering how many consumers are like me, in that I wanted a netbook a heck of a lot worse, before I got a really good smartphone. I may still buy a netbook down the road, but I feel a lot less of an urge now.

  57. Re:No, it wasn't the iPad .. but Steve Jobs was ri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no they do different things. it's really ok to not find one thing useful and another thing useful, but still acknowledge were others my feel the reverse.

    i have no interest in an iPad for entertainment and "relaxing" as you do, but my eeepc900 has been in my mini man-bag since i bought it, and i love it.

    when at work i use a massive linux desktop with two giant monitor, when i am home, same setup. should i be in the living room and want to skype or look something up, leaning over
    grabbing the eeepc is great. and i bought it for less than 300.00

    see? different needs? different preferences? see how that works?

  58. Re:Whatever it takes! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    No, I just thought pixie dust might aid in the delivery of "magical" products...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  59. This is good news to the rest of us by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Netbook sales have both eaten into notebook/laptop sales, and propped up low-end notebook prices. Actually, netbooks are horribly overpriced, but enough of that heresy for now...

    So hopefully, as the iPad settles in and assumes its long-term share of the market, the toybois will get off of the netbooks, which will drop to a rational share, and low-end notebooks will drop in price as well.

    This is good for me. I need more than a 10 inch screen. Actually, I need more than a 12 inch screen usually, but my X41 Tablet has its purposes. Get these baby-screen things off the market, so some manufacturing capacity is free for what *I* want, which is a new cheap notebook for my wife so she stops breaking my current one in half. I'm tired of soldering this thing back together.

    And no, I'm not selfish at all. Thank you.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  60. ::sniff:: by GlennYaHeard · · Score: 0

    Smells like B***S***

  61. Re:People are idiots by snikulin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nah... It's more like "Slashdotters are ostriches".

  62. Or maybe the market is saturated? by fantomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or maybe the vast majority of people who wanted a netbook now have one and that's why sales have slowed down. Were people expecting month on month rise in sales of 641% for ever? sounds like a new market plateauing to me.

    Early adopters might change their laptop eevery six months but most people will hang on to the same one for 2, 3 or more years. They've bought them and now the market has shrunk to a more mature marketplace shape?

    1. Re:Or maybe the market is saturated? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      What? You didn't buy 6 netbooks last month and don't plan on buying 38 this month?

    2. Re:Or maybe the market is saturated? by fantomas · · Score: 1

      Actually I bought 39 when they came out and I've just put in an order for 6 this month, you must be a mind reader! :-)

      I work in a university and we do research with local schools on how schoolkids use technology, so we bought a whole class set at the beginning of the project in 2007 - Asus EEE 701s, they work great, totally do what we want them to and the students love them. Now we've got a little more money to do a small scale investigation so we're buying a set to test current generation netbooks.
      http://www.pi-project.ac.uk/

      But I've still to buy one for myself! :-)

  63. I do not see the connection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If I choose to buy a netbook DESPITE its limited hardware capabilities, it's probably because I like the price tag. I don't see how the iPad is the cause of the fall in sales of netbooks. It's an expensive device that caters to an entiredly different crowd. Most likely the fall in sales of the netbook probably has to do with it's very sharp growth. It has reached a large percentage of its target audience (who really were waiting for something like that for a while) and now the pool of users can only grow more slowly. when you have an astonishingly high growth rate, it cannot be maintained forever.

    This kind of analysis suffers the same problem as assuming unlimited growth of the economy. If you ahve a limited resource (here potential clients) the faster and more succesffully this resource is tapped into at the beginning, the faster you will run out of it.

    Somebody is paid to sell the iPad line. Because they don't share the same niche. It's a non-story.

  64. Re:Whatever it takes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woosh...

  65. The market I think I've identified by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    I've not entirely worked out what that need is

    I'm about to buy an iPad, my first Apple product.

    I'm going to give it to my sister. She's in bed most of the time. 18 heart surgeries, losing a lung, various other things over the last 10 years have left her bedridden for 20 hours a day or so. She has an occasional desire to look up content such as the identity of an actor on TV or the definition of a word. A PC would be fine and I got her a simple setup a while back but using a laptop in bed or using the desktop that's 10 feet away is either awkward or too much physical effort.

    We're going to try the iPad.

    it seems to target a market that doesn't contain me

    Frankly, if my disabled sister didn't live with me I think I'd have a hard time envisioning a use for the device.

  66. "fell of a clif in January" by boristdog · · Score: 1

    but netbook sales fell off a cliff in January

    Um yeah, popular devices do that right after Xmas.

  67. an iPad keyboard is not that expensive by peter303 · · Score: 1

    several vendors sell them

  68. I want one - Drawing and handwritten notes by Bryan3000000 · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you exactly what I want an iPad for - no matter how much money I spend on a laptop, I can't draw on the screen. Okay, HP makes one that looks decent for that, but Windows tablets are well proven to be awful for usability. With an iPad, I could hit one icon and then draw a picture, scratch out a small map, take handwritten notes with, say, a small map or maybe an equation. NONE of this is possible with any previous product with any real level of real-world usability. It's something that the old Palm Pilots hit on, but the iPad has a really usable size and the best screen around. You can get a stylus that works with it for $15, or make your own with conductive foam apparently. You can probably put something together pretty easily that would be more accurate.

    It has that functionality plus most of the common functionality of a laptop, and maybe even better for web/video/books - that's a winner. No company has ever delivered on the promise to put something like this in our hands - we've seen it on Star Trek, in movies. It has to be simple and just work, or it fails to deliver on the promise. You get a device like this that a three year old can use to color a picture or watch a movie, and an adult can use to read, communicate, jot notes, and even produce at least some things - who wouldn't want that? It's got all bases covered. Maybe I'll be able to get one by the next version and maybe it will come with a webcam. Yes, I might wish for it to be a full linux device, or have the full BSD subsystem, but in a very big way that might actually break my idea of what I want it to be.

    If someone sold a capacitive overlay on my Macbook screen for $100 or less, I'd take that as an acceptable but still not ideal substitute.

    1. Re:I want one - Drawing and handwritten notes by narcc · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you exactly what I want an iPad for - no matter how much money I spend on a laptop, I can't draw on the screen. Okay, HP makes one that looks decent for that, but Windows tablets are well proven to be awful for usability. With an iPad, I could hit one icon and then draw a picture, scratch out a small map, take handwritten notes with, say, a small map or maybe an equation. NONE of this is possible with any previous product with any real level of real-world usability.

      None? I had a giveaway Casio PV-400plus which did that instantly. A set of batteries would last for months of heavy use in the thing. Oh yeah, it was painless to sync with my computer -- just drop it in the doc and hit 'sync'. As for real-world usability, it had an excellent mobile spreadsheet app I used for innumerable reasons in the few years I had it.

      But you're about to give your own contradictory example aren't you?

      It's something that the old Palm Pilots hit on,

      Hardly NONE then is it?

      but the iPad has a really usable size and the best screen around. You can get a stylus that works with it for $15, or make your own with conductive foam apparently. You can probably put something together pretty easily that would be more accurate.

      Know what works even better for this drawing function you're so excited about? A $0.10 notepad and $1 pack of pens. Great battery life, automatically saves your work, easy to read in direct sunlight, and comes in an amazing number of sizes with innumerable color options. At the price-point, you can afford to have hundreds of the things just lying around!

      It has that functionality plus most of the common functionality of a laptop, and maybe even better for web/video/books

      Yeah, except it's not better for web, video, or books. The web part should be obvious (hint: not better). Video, I don't know about. All I know is that if I'm watching a movie, I don't want to cradle a 1.5 pound screen. For watching a movie with someone else, this wouldn't really make sense. Maybe it would be okay for youtube videos, but is that really worth (minimum) $500? BOOKS! For just $250, I can get a reader with a nice e-ink display, free wireless internet, and battery life that puts the iPad to shame. The iPad weighs 1.5 pounds and has a crummy display... compared to a /laptop/ for reading books? The iPad wins on portability.

      Let's face reality here: It's not a new 'device class', it's not revolutionary, it won't shift any paradigms, it won't change the computing landscape, it won't even multi-task. It's just an expensive toy.

      If you want an iPad to play with -- because you think it might be fun -- enjoy! But let's be Honest about what it is and what it can do.

      You present a dishonest use case:

      You get a device like this that a three year old can use to color a picture or watch a movie

      No way would any sensible person give a three-year-old an iPad -- it's just a bad idea. Think about this for a minute! What happens WHEN they break the GLASS display? And you suggest this device For COLORING of all things?! Buy a Coloring Book!

      Some people...

    2. Re:I want one - Drawing and handwritten notes by Bryan3000000 · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, you're completely correct in each element of your argument. But as whole, I'm going to have to disagree.

      I'm all over the pen and paper, and I'm all over actual books, and so forth. But what happens on all those occasions when I actually want to save something permanently, and/or it's a pain to find a pen and paper (read: always in my life)? Normally, I open up my laptop, or phone, open an app, maybe have to activate the touchscreen keyboard... iPad, turn on, hit one icon, jot note in my handwriting. Yes, the Palm Pilot could do this - I loved them. They were tiny and had crappy displays, unfortunately. I would, to this day, love to see a large full color Palm Pilot running the classic Palm OS. The iPad is like Palm Pilots because of the large base of useful applications that are relatively easy to develop. It's unfortunate that the iPad is not as open as the Palm Pilots, but we're also in a different era of device security threats.

      So you're right, nothing here is revolutionary. Literally, nothing. It's just the tool of this particular time. No, I wouldn't give it to my three year old, probably. My point was that it's easy enough to use that if I did, my three year old could actually turn it on, start the coloring app, and use it. It is that easy to use, and at the same time you can use it to get real work done, and for entertainment. I read numerous books on a Palm Pilot. The iPad would make that even more of a joy.

      Although it's not revolutionary, putting this all together in one device that's easy to use and beautiful IS paradigm shifting. It sets expectations. It says, "You know those little screens people carry around in sci-fi movies? Here's one you can actually buy and use." Sorry, but your Casio was a very pale reflection of that vision, which lacked even what the Palm Pilot tried to deliver. No, the iPad does not fully deliver on it either, but it's getting remarkably close. So close that yes, I think it's cool. So close that I could do almost my entire job as an IT director for a small tech startup on it, by using it to connect to servers and occasionally a remote desktop. Plus I could do things that I love to do, but don't really like doing on my laptop, which is literally with me always.

      Sorry to get snarky, but, oh yeah, that was you that got snarky. I completely dismissed the iPad myself until I read some reviews saying that the hands-on gives you a completely new experience. So I went and played with one, and while I wasn't nearly as wowed as the reviewers, they were at least a little bit right.

  69. Re:Whatever it takes! by Ltap · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fox trying to report on science is just... too cute for words. Like watching a very stupid dog trying to bash its way through a glass sliding door.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  70. 28 days? by sudnshok · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to take away the fact that they sold 1 million units very quickly, but technically they were "selling" them longer than 28 days via pre-orders. Did Apple take pre-orders for the iPhone that the article compares sales rate to? I can't remember. Most of their new products are not available to buy until they are actually available.

    --
    People who say "money does not buy happiness" are just people without money trying to make themselves feel better.
  71. Honestly. by fauxhammer · · Score: 1

    i own a macbook. I work at an apple authorized reseller. I'm not planning on buying an iPad. But they aren't a worthless device, as people seem to be desperate to convince themselves. They're a very good choice for the demographic of (mostly elderly) people who have never owned a computer. For these people, even a Mac is unnecessarily complicated. These are people who double click on URLs because hey, they want it to open, and you double click to open, right? iPads are perfect for these people. All they want to do is read the news online, read email their grandkids, and watch youtube videos that make fun of Obama. The fact that it's so simplified is a virtue for them.

  72. Re:No, it wasn't the iPad .. but Steve Jobs was ri by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    No. No one's buying Netbooks anymore because they already have one. Performance didn't really go up in the last couple of years so owners of early netbooks don't feel the need to upgrade.
    I find the smaller 9" and less netbooks really comfy on my lap or in other ways the iPad could be used for and offer many more options than the iPad (multitasking, flash, hi-def video, usb peripherals...) and cost half the price.
    Power conserving netbooks get to 8 hrs of intensive work on 4 to 6 cell batteries.

    --
    ^_^
  73. Does he float? by Maladius · · Score: 1

    says Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. 'Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.'

    You heard it here first folks...he finally admits it...Steve Jobs...is a witch. And what do we do with witches?

  74. Does no-one on Slashdot know how to read a graph? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the chart, it shows netbook sales GROWTH fell. So sales are still rising, but at a much reduced rate.
    It's the difference between x and dx.
    Learn how to read a graph, guys!

  75. Correlation. Causation. by mantis2009 · · Score: 1

    Correlation != Causation.

    Correlation is not the same thing as causation.

    When two things are happening at the same time, it doesn't mean that they have a relationship with one another.

    This coffee is hot, and netbook sales are down.

    You're an idiot, and iPads are selling like hotcakes.

  76. Re:No, it wasn't the iPad .. but Steve Jobs was ri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a hard time justifying buying an inferior tiny product that you can barely see.

    The iPad is successful with people because it provides a big huge screen

    Although I don't care to defend netbooks as a whole, my netbook has a 10.1" screen, compared to the iPad's 9.7" screen..

  77. 1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just a bad article in general. They're reporting year over year growth of Netbooks, which was going to plateau eventually. They're still on track to sell more than 20 million netbooks this year. 1 million iPads displacing 1 million units of netbooks isn't an enormous drop - it's about 5% of sales. Tops. I know a lot of engineers who weren't considering a netbook at all, but wanted a new shiny apple toy, so they bought the iPad.
     
    All the graph in the article does is illustrate a decline in growth of an established product. iPod sales growth has been declining too, but that's simply because literally everyone and their mother owns one now, and people are simply replacing them or buying their child their first iPod. Nobody's making splashy headlines about that. All products plateau eventually, and it happens sooner than later when their adoption rates skyrocket at launch.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1 million iPads in 30 days versus 20 million netbooks from dozens of nameless, faceless vendors in 365 days.

      iPad sales have plateaued, but I wouldn't be surprised that by the end of the year, that number starts to approach 2 million.

      Compared to any given Netbook product this year, the iPad will outsell it by a wide margin.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      5% of sales *in a month.* The big question is how long will sales continue to accelerate and what will the sales velocity be at that point and for how long? By the end of the year will Apple still be selling a million units a month? If so then that's 12M per year and that's going to be eating a much more significant chunk of netbook sales. So I don't think it's time to write off the iPad as insignificant to the netbook industry..

    3. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Goaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're comparing 1 million sold in 28 days with 20 million sold in a year, and you're accusing others of misrepresenting numbers?

    4. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by nabsltd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Compared to any given Netbook product this year, the iPad will outsell it by a wide margin.

      If you want to compare fairly, compare one iPad SKU (out of the 5-6 total...I don't keep track of every variation on vendor-locked products with no possibility for permanent expansion) to a single netbook SKU.

      Still, I'm sure Apple will sell a gazillion iPads, and many buyers will use them for a few hours each month once the original novelty wears off (and the lack of true features kicks in after similar products hit the market). The rest of us will spend our money wisely.

    5. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're still on track to sell more than 20 million netbooks this year. 1 million iPads displacing 1 million units of netbooks isn't an enormous drop - it's about 5% of sales. Tops.

      1 million iPads displaced in one month. That's 12 million per year (perhaps less, as initial demand dies down, perhaps more, as production meets demand and international sales begin). That's greater than 50%, not "5% tops".

      All the graph in the article does is illustrate a decline in growth of an established product.

      It shows growth has flatlined (5% for April). One thing this graph shows for certain is that the iPad is undeniably having a negative impact on the netbook.

      iPod sales growth has been declining too, but that's simply because literally everyone and their mother owns one now, and people are simply replacing them or buying their child their first iPod.

      The iPod's decline in growth has been offset by the iPod Touch and iPhone. Apple keeps ahead of the game by being the ones who sell the product that replaces their old one.

      So the question for the netbook is, what product is going to replace it? Answer: iPad.

      Market saturation a la iPod not the reason for the netbook decline. Until the iPad, netbooks were pretty much the only game in town for ultraportable computing beyond a smartphone. Now the iPad fills that role, and it fills it far better than any netbook, because the iPad is designed from the ground up for that very purpose. The netbook is a parody of a real computer. It's an atavistic dead-end.

      As far as those numbers go, do you really think that somehow netbooks are approaching an asymptote of 0% YoY growth? Because that doesn't seem terribly likely. It's not like the market is going to fall off so quickly and just stop at "status quo from last year". In the course of less than a year, netbook growth went from over 600%, to just 5%.

      The writing is on the wall. Take off the nerd glasses and maybe you'll be able to read it.

    6. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      It's all going to be hard to compare at this point. Netbooks have been out for a few years now. Everybody who really, REALLY wanted one has one for the most part.

      iPads came out much more recently. You're going to expect a huge number of sales at the start, and then another peak when the 3G versions are released. In all honestly, you're going to have to wait until next year (after both are established in the market) before being able to meaningfully compare the numbers at all.

      Just IMHO, I think the pad in and of itself is a useful form factor. I'd personally rather have that STYLE of computer over a netbook. That said, I'm waiting on an Android pad before I move on it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      you mean like the iPhone, and the iPod Touch?

      If the iPad came out with out the context of the iPhone, I'd be more inclined to agree with you.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    8. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I remember my father telling me about the first microcomputer he bought for the family:

      Well, it's just a new shiny toy, it has nothing to do in power with a "real" computer, but maybe you can get something out of it.

    9. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      iPad has less functionality than a netbook, and cost twice as much ("Less costs more" -- the same philosophy behind the Airbook!). When an iPad costs less than a netbook, then I might believe it threatens netbook sales. But currently, they are different market segments. iPads are designed purely for consuming content. Netbooks are also mostly for consuming content, but with occasional use of traditional PC apps, which the iPad simply does not support. This backwards compatibility with a desktop PC running Windows XP is the reason people buy netbooks instead of iPads. Not many netbooks running Linux have sold, have they?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're still on track to sell more than 20 million netbooks this year. 1 million iPads displacing 1 million units of netbooks isn't an enormous drop - it's about 5% of sales. Tops.

      1 million iPads displaced in one month. That's 12 million per year (perhaps less, as initial demand dies down, perhaps more, as production meets demand and international sales begin). That's greater than 50%, not "5% tops".

      That might be 12 million per year if sales figures hold up

    11. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Will be interesting to see how iPad sales change once HP and Microsoft next-gen tablets hit the ground.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by node+3 · · Score: 1

      If you had bothered the read the part you quoted, you'd have noticed I said exactly that.

    13. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Will be interesting to see how iPad sales change once HP and Microsoft next-gen tablets hit the ground.

      Next gen? iPad is next gen.

      It will be interesting to see what HP, Dell and ASUS come up with (MS never had a tablet). I don't think they'll have much success against the iPad. Windows 7 is a dead-end tablet OS, and Chrome is a cloud netbook OS that hasn't even gotten off the ground, so that basically leaves WebOS and Android. I just don't see how a tablet based on either of those is going to gain much traction.

      By the time HP is able to come up with a WebOS slate, the iPad will be at, or very close to, revision 2.

    14. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Oh, I meant HP/Microsoft next-gen. I have to support/use current HP tablets and they kinda' suck.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    15. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You're comparing 1 million sold in 28 days with 20 million sold in a year, and you're accusing others of misrepresenting numbers?

      No, he's just extrapolating.

      One of my friends got pregnant last month, I expect by July next year she'll have 13 children.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

      If you sell 20 million in a year, you're selling about 1.5 million every 28 days... and that's WITHOUT the new-product sales rush. So, if anything it's a generous comparison.

    17. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      One thing this graph shows for certain is that the iPad is undeniably having a negative impact on the netbook.

      Ahh, no, one thing that graph certainly does not show for certain is that the iPod is having any effect on the netbook (though I am sure it is having some).

      Repeat, out loud, one hundred times:

      Correlation is NOT causation.

      Correlation is NOT causation.

    18. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      The mistake here is in thinking that simply more functionality is the key to a great product. It isn't. Who cares how much functionality you have if much of that functionality doesn't function very well. The name of the competing product says it all; people were interested in netbooks a while back because they offered a way to get on the web, even if the performance and functionality in other areas was lacking. That was OK because many people didn't need additional functionality.

    19. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Repeat, out loud, one hundred times:

      Correlation is NOT causation.

      Correlation is NOT causation.

      Except that in some cases (like this) it is.

    20. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Well said. Of course it's not surprising to see this Apple spin here - Slashdot is now primarily an Apple news site (that covers other geek stories too, but the days of being oriented towards Linux or open source are long gone).

      If they're comparing the Ipad to netbooks, why not to phones - how do Ipad sales compare to the hundreds of millions that Nokia sell each year?

    21. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I want to see a netbook that has a sensitive screen. Multitouch would be nice (all this at less than half the cost of an iPad). And that can be folded "tablet-style" for reading simple things in a cramped environment.

    22. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  78. Great marketing machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll have to admit Apple has one hell of a marketing machine. Only a company with a marketing muscle liike this can make people want to buy a product that costs more and yet offers less than most netbooks in the same price range

  79. Re:Whatever it takes! by rickb928 · · Score: 0, Troll

    They are not alone...

    The BBC has this problem.

    As does CNN.

    Even Engadget has their finger on this pulse...

    And the odd TV station.

    And just plain odd sites.

    The U.S. Army got in on this one.

    And Rutgers University chimed in. Well, someone at Rutgers.

    If your point was that Fox News got snookered, well, they are in good company. If your point was that this is jsut another example of Fox News incompetence, well, you can use the same brush to tar CNN and the BBC. Though what the threee have in common escapes me. Oh, wait, I know.

    They all purport to deliver the truth.

    Right.

    Nice try though. Keep swinging. In baseball, succeeding once in 4 at bats will get you a decent job. In politics and Slashdot, you need much less. Way much less.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  80. 28 days later? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the title be "iPad turning Netbooks into zombies"?

  81. At least TRY to draw fair comparisons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that this goes against the trend here but I'll chime in here as an actual iPad owner

    Is it a replacement for my pc or my laptop? of course not. Is that even a valid question? of course not.

    iPads are not about replacing your existing systems, it is about a new category of systems.

    people building an argument against the iPad based on it not being able to compete with their desktop/laptop are building a false argument. It is not mean to do those things.

    For what the device is designed for (holdable web browsing/gaming/books/misc apps) it is a delightful product.

    Stop trying to attack the device on grounds that are irrelevent.

    the only device that can be reasonably said to compete with the ipad is netbooks. And the two devices use dramatically different approaches and metaphors, so even that comparison is flawed. Keyboard versus touch. Ease of use versus flexibility. There are many variables, and saying that any one factor defines one device as better than the other is a foolish attempt to bolster an uninformed viewpoint.

    Now, that being said, i should clarify that the flash thing irks me. I'm no rabid apple fan. But at least give credit where credit is due.

  82. 1 million sold by bigNuns · · Score: 1

    demand cant be met... odd that I can go to bestbuy right now and purchase one.

    1 million sold to brick and mortar/catalog stores does not equate to 1 million sold to consumers. Why no one calls them on this number is beyond me. Must be the magic they have in them.

    --
    .................... ...mmm farm fresh...
  83. The next iPad by Dukenukemx · · Score: 1

    Hey, look what someone got from the kid that lost that protype iPhone. It's the next iPad. http://redvsblue.com/archive/?id=1233

  84. Re:How will Slashdotters cope with being wrong? by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

    Hahaha I was modded troll here. And my parent post. Thanks Apple haters :) You sure are proving you are capable of cohesive arguments!

  85. Microsoft did it by joepress99 · · Score: 1

    Netbooks died when the switched to Windows 7 from linux. IPAD had nothing to do with - put Windows 7 on them, boost the specs on netbooks to support Window7 and suddenly they are not as cheap as they were and they were popular because of the cost difference. Now a low end laptop is actually cheaper than some Windows7 "Netbooks"

  86. Cause I don't type much or visit flash sites ? by curri · · Score: 1

    And, the screen is way smaller, but, OTOH, I keep the iPad much closer than my laptop. Don't get me wrong, I use my laptop for real work, but the iPad is great for casual browsing, especially on the couch (that is, if I can take it away from my kids :)

  87. i have an asus netbook i purchased in march by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    and rolled my eyes at the ipad hysteria

    here's my amazing 2 word rebuttal to the esteemed professional analyst's smoke and mirrors:

    1. keyboard
    2. price

    end of discussion, advantange: netbook

    hey, professional analysts: the crowd that spends 6 dollars on a cup of coffee is a small upper middle class niche that lives and works in midtown manhattan. maybe you should, in your vast analytical powers, stop to notice the wider, poorer world outside your little bubble

    and i live and work in midtown manhattan! if i can do it, why can't you?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i have an asus netbook i purchased in march by pantherace · · Score: 1

      Well, compare netbook price to a year ago, you'll find it's gone up, drastically. The EEEs which were ~$200 (or less, someone in my family purchased a 900 for $160), are now, at a minimum $300. It's no wonder sales have declined, with such an increase in price.

      Amazing how that little detail seems to be left out of most people looking at it. Even people with business degrees should be able to recognize that.

  88. I think it's sad... by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

    sad that so many Slashdot readers are so financially strapped that they can't conceive of the possibility of owning a device that doesn't fit 100% of their computing needs, even though it may be an ideal fit for many of them.

    Personally, I own both a netbook AND an iPad. I've been using the netbook as my primary computing device for over two months now while traveling on business and it's been great. I use the iPad for sitting on the couch websurfing, and ebook reading...tasks that any laptop format device sucks at.

    So I guess my response to the question of "why would I want a device that doesn't do everything" is twofold:
    1. No device does everything well, so I'm using devices that are best suited for the tasks at hand. 2. I can afford it. Seriously, are you people so strapped for cash that $399 is a completely outrageous sum of money? Get a job hippie!

  89. iPad is destroying Apple's future by fortapocalypse · · Score: 1

    iPad is the first Apple product in the last ten years (that I can think of) that has generated a visible rift in those who were previously supporting Apple. From the poor naming of the device to almost everything about it, some people that are big into Macs think it sucks. Now even Ellen DeGeneres is bashing it. I think Apple needs to really think about how it is going to bring the community back together.

  90. 400lbs = anorexic gorilla by frist · · Score: 1

    400lbs is on the light side for a gorilla.

  91. Re:Whatever it takes! by node+3 · · Score: 1

    Um, no. He wasn't talking about that specific story, just the idea of a "news" organization so ignorantly backwards as Fox News reporting on science, is like McDonald's putting out a healthy recipes cookbook. In a word, ironic.

    The funniest thing about defense of Fox News (or Bush or whatever) is almost always to point out a way in which, superficially, some non-conservative agency has done the same thing. "Bush lied about war? Clinton lied about sex!" or in this case, "Fox used the term 'pixie dust'? So did CNN!"

  92. Putting the hurt on Flash... by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    The iPad intentionally does not support Adobe's flash and now, looks like it will be a runaway best seller. I wouldn't want to be Youtube with millions of people wanting to know why they can't watch those youtube flash videos on the same super video-capable iPad that they are watching tv shows and movies on. The pressure on Youtube to support non-flash video alternatives is building fast and they are probably going to cave soon. That will REALLY put the hurt on Flash.

  93. utter hogwash... by Dretep · · Score: 1

    The feminine computing product that Aqqle released is not destroying netbook sales, notebook sales are destroying netbook sales. Heck, I was going to buy my wife a netbook last Christmas when I found a notebook by the same manufacturer for the same price with better processor, more RAM, DVD drive, larger display and full size keyboard. Netbooks looked like a good deal and were something new a few years ago but they're outdated now. Aqqle's iPad will fair the same, until the iTampon comes out...

  94. Or is it 12 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks? by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

    if you can sell it 12 months in a year

  95. You're missing something big by SpiceWare · · Score: 1

    that 1 million in iPad sales occurred in a single country.

  96. Re:Or is it 12 million iPads vs 20 million Netbook by Hadlock · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'll eat my hat if Apple sells 12 million iPads in 2010. 6-8 million is very likely however. At the end of the year though, 3 million of those units are likely to have been bought simply due to Apple marketing and not because it was a better option to the customer than a netbook. Perhaps 3-5 million units will be "cannibalized" from Netbook sales by the end of the year.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  97. More != Better by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Disclosure: I don't own an iPad and have no intention of buying one anytime soon.

    You are aware of the iPad's poor ergonomics for longer term use, right?

    That depends on exactly what the use is. If the use is watching movies or reading while traveling, it's better than a laptop. For any meaningful spreadsheet work I wouldn't touch the iPad with a ten foot cattle prod. The iPad is better for some uses and worse for others. Use what suits your particular needs best at the time.

    No they aren't, and apps are censored by Apple meaning there will be fewer than there otherwise would be.

    So what? More does not equal better. 10,000 crappy applications are worth less than one really good one. I don't care how many total applications there are. I do care how many good applications there are for my needs. I don't really care if those applications don't suit your needs.

    1. Re:More != Better by sznupi · · Score: 1

      BTW, using the better at the time (implies the second is just stacked somewhere) device strikes me as incredibly wastefull TBH. There is no real reason why a netbook can't convert, with appropriate UI modification in the process, to a nice tablet (some do, just the UI/software part is partly missing); it won't be that much larger, and essentially equally good...plus the possibility of acting as "creative" on-the-go machine, too.

      But somehow one major market decides it's actually a good idea to waste resources on, heck, mostly replication? Well, we shouldn't be surprised really; society with way too much of its members quite readily buying in the past ridiculously oversized and typically unneeded cars needs its new bling...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  98. Of course not. by BancBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    He uses Pixar Dust, duh!

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
  99. Revised definition by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Most of the people on slashdot are not truly ignorant; instead they primarily fall into the "brilliant but really annoying" category.

    I disput how many years you can be dead-wrong on the same topic and still be called brilliant.

    To me, a "brilliant" person would seek to learn from error. Something I'm not sure I've ever seen an Apple Hater here do.

    Basically that just leaves you with "really annoying". No argument here.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Revised definition by Locke2005 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I disput how many years you can be dead-wrong on the same topic and still be called brilliant.

      Stephen Hawking and Allan Greenspan have both admitted they fucked up, and both are still considered brilliant. (Greenspan on financial markets' ability to regulate themselves, and Hawking on time reversing and running backwards, amongst other things.)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  100. The rules of trolling by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    1) Never admit that you're trolling
    2) Post anonymously to avoid Karma damage
    3) Write something that people might suspect, at least for a few seconds, actually makes some sense

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  101. What Ain't Broke by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ... no Flash support
    We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

    They still haven't fixed it, and they're clearly not going to.

    As the saying goes, don't fix what ain't broke.

    Enjoy browsing with Flash on and unblockable from comparable devices. The iPad will still be waiting for you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What Ain't Broke by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Enjoy browsing with Flash on and unblockable from comparable devices.

      What do you mean, unblockable? The Flash-enabled Android devices we've seen so far have a switch to disable Flash, if that's what you want. Or you can install a different browser, since the Android Market has no policy against "duplicating the functionality" of built-in apps.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  102. Depends on what you are doing by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I'd agree that netbooks are barely content creation devices, they are convenient to carry, read some e-mails, surf the web, maybe do a little writing but they really aren't that great at any of it.

    I'm typing this on a netbook (an Asus Eee 1000HE) and you are greatly underestimating netbooks. It's true that their screen size/resolution is limiting at times BUT not nearly as much as you might think. I use mine for email, web surfing, word processing, spreadsheets, dreamweaver, gimp, quickbooks (I'm an accountant), quicken, and most everything else I use my desktop for except games. When I need more screen real estate I plug it into my 20 inch monitor and viola, I have 1280x1024 resolution. In fact I probably use it plugged into a monitor between 25%-50% of the time since I'm not always traveling. When I travel it's compact and I'm generally unlikely to do much work that requires large screen real estate anyway. I DO however need a keyboard most of the time for MY work and an iPad would be an inconvenient choice for me. A netbook suits me fine at the moment.

    The iPad is much more portable and easy to handle than a netbook...

    That depends very much on what your are doing with it. I guarantee the iPad is not more portable or easier to handle than my netbook for what I use my netbook for. Your mileage may vary of course for your particular needs.

    performs better on content consumption and almost as well on content creation

    Again, depends on what you are doing. I wouldn't touch an iPad for serious spreadsheet work and it would need a keyboard for any serious writing at which point you might as well at least consider a netbook. If I'm reading something on the go or wanting to watch a movie though the iPad could be a superior choice. I think if they came out with an optional stylus the iPad could be awesome for note taking at schools but I doubt that will happen.

    The iPad is cool but it's not better than a netbook (or any other pc) for all purposes. The superiority of one over the other depends on the particular application and your particular usage habits/needs.

  103. collateral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "collateral damage"? isn't the ipad's existence a direct attack on netbooks?

  104. Re:Or is it 12 million iPads vs 20 million Netbook by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

    <quote><p>I'll eat my hat if Apple sells 12 million iPads in 2010</p></quote>
    I don't expect it either but looking at the iPhone figures, they might.

    <quote><p>Perhaps 3-5 million units will be "cannibalized" from Netbook sales by the end of the year.</p></quote>
    Yes but that's a 3-5 million dent in a period equivalent of 15 million netbooks sales.  It's more than "about 5% of sales"

  105. You have no point. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    I want to be able to install whatever I want, whenever I want, from whoever I want without Jobs policing me.

    Jailbreak it then.

    Or become a developer, I can compile and run anything I like for the device.

    Next lame argument please. Now serving number 348302389034859043850.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You have no point. by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      Or become a developer

      Your suggestion for getting $300 device functionality out of a $500 device is to buy a $600 computer and a $100 dev license?

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    2. Re:You have no point. by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      So in order to get full functionality, I need to either go illegal or pay 100 bucks a year? Wow, you're really answering my points with viable options now. I totally would do that.

      Oh ya, and non-developers don't know what "compiling" is and probably won't dare trying the former. As you so aptly said, next lame counter-argument please?

  106. The iPad may be a nifty device... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but I'm waiting for the iMat!

    http://www.tomsguide.com/us/iPad-iMat-iBoard-Joke,news-5968.html

  107. Probably killing as many ebook-reader sales by wrencherd · · Score: 1

    I gave one as a gift based on a comparison with available ebook-readers (Kindle and Sony).

    Given the price (for the base iPad) it was better all the way around--particularly as the person I was giving it to already had a Mac to sync with--b/c of everything else it offered (including techno-fetishism) beyond books.

  108. Re:Or is it 12 million iPads vs 20 million Netbook by Hadlock · · Score: 1, Informative

    Looks like total netbook sales for 2009 was 32 million units, not 20 million as had been predicted at the beginning of 2009. 10% is a fair chunk, but I'm sure HP, Asus and Acer each have in the ballpark of 10% of the netbook market.
     
    Also stalled growth is largely due to both consumers and manufacturers waiting to see what Apple had in store. Preliminary data is one thing, but it's the back to school numbers leading up to August that seal the deal.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  109. Yep - content creation with a netbook by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Netbook a content creation device? Please...

    Absolutely netbooks are fine for content creation. Use mine for that all the time - I'm typing this post on one. Not for every kind of content of course but for word processing, email, spreadsheets, accounting, low end photo editing, web page creation and more it works great. Yes you can edit video on a netbook. No you wouldn't do high end work (wouldn't use an iPad either) but for casual/occasional use it is fine. Plus I can plug it into a larger monitor if for some reason I need more screen real estate.

    Mix music? How many DSP plugins do you think a Netbook can handle when editing audio?

    As many as I'm ever going to use it for. Your mileage may vary. If you have serious hardware needs for a specific purpose, neither an iPad or a netbooks is likely to suit you. Different tools for different jobs.

  110. Re:Another explanation on currnet netbook prices.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RAM cost 2x now what it did one year ago, the increase far offsets the lower cost of hard disk drives. Also, LCD panels are up over 10%.

  111. Re:Whatever it takes! by node+3 · · Score: 1

    Yeah. And I was just pointing out that virtually identical reporting is done by several allegedly reputable and competent news organizations also. So the distinction was that when Fox did it, it was an ignorantly backwards news organization, but when, for example, CNN did it, it was at worst an honest mistake?

    Um, no, because using the words "Pixie Dust" isn't a problem.

  112. Overpriced by Kytro · · Score: 0

    I can't believe people pay what they do for the iPad, talk about overpriced.

  113. iPad will be a flop... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No one will buy them.. they are DRM encrusted.. bla bla bla

    Hate to break it to you, but those of us that tried to explain that WE are not the target market were right.. The 'masses' love the things and are buying them like hotcakes.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  114. Really? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    How do you upload your pictures from your camera to the net?

    How do you watch a DVD.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Really? by fredmosby · · Score: 1

      I've been meaning to buy a camera, but right now I just use my cell phone which can upload to the net.

      I haven't actually used a DVD in years. I just download everything I watch.

  115. hua by luther349 · · Score: 0

    the ipads nice but its no netbook. netbook sales have drooped not due to the ipad but there prices have risen over the years. you can pretty much get a low end laptop for the netbook prices these days and have alot more power. netbooks started out as cheap laptops and wile there prices rose laptop prices fell. when netbook makers go back to making them cheaper then laptops there sales will go up again. same goes for the ipad its priced around the same as a netbook. so what is the custmer going to go with. when auses makes another 199$ eee with a atom dule core i bet it will couse another surge in sales..

  116. Time for a /. poll by ooooli · · Score: 1

    (1) I know how to patch a Linux kernel and I own/want an iPad
    (2) I know how to patch a Linux kernel and I don't want an iPad
    (3) I don't know how to patch a Linux kernel and I own/want an iPad
    (4) I don't know how to patch a Linux kernel and I don't want an iPad
    (5) I'll buy one right after Cowboy Neal

    I'm pretty sure some people here would be surprised...

  117. lol wut? by Zencyde · · Score: 1

    So, 44 percent of people that were intending to buy a portable computing device purchased an Apple portable computing device instead? I don't think that says anything except that a lot of the people that have/are considering buying an iPad were considering buying an equivalent device (netbook) prior to discovering the iPad.

    The drop in netbook sales momentum has been relatively consistent and this implies that there are other factors at play. What about how powerful smart phones are now? The Nexus One could provide all of the needs a netbook would.

    --
    What day is it? Could you please tell me?
  118. Actually... by wfolta · · Score: 1

    It appears that many on /. simply have no imagination. They cannot see that form-factor can be a feature or a drawback. They imagine all computing tasks as desktop or pseudo-desktop (laptop/netbook) tasks and do not even notice that laptops/netbooks have a poor form factor for many tasks, and the iPad has an incredible form factor. So they perceive no gain, only loss, but that's a failure of imagination that many non-/.-ers do not suffer from.

    Many of us can use a laptop for extended editing, for compiling, for video editing, for running statistics with R, but can also see the benefit of browsing the web, or working with our calendar, doing email, adding some data to a spreadsheet, or reading a book with a different (superior) interface and form factor -- even a different posture.

    1. Re:Actually... by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      Many of us can use a laptop for extended editing, for compiling, for video editing, for running statistics with R, but can also see the benefit of browsing the web, or working with our calendar, doing email, adding some data to a spreadsheet, or reading a book with a different (superior) interface and form factor -- even a different posture.

      Yes, but for those who work with computers, those tasks are already tightly coupled to their work device. Hence, there is no added utility for them. It's not a lack of imagination, just a perceived redundancy. Why do I need to maintain a secondary gadget, when my primary device performs all those tasks, which are only unavailable when taking a break from the computer.

      The iPad is an interesting device, and it's form factor is good. I just don't need to be attached to a computer 24/7. Going outside or reading a dead-tree book on my off time suits me just fine, thankyouverymuch. This is not a failure of imagination, just an immunity to the Apple hype machine based on pragmatic views..

  119. "Sales fell off a cliff..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck, get it right will you!
    The article says, and the graph shows, that sales GROWTH fell off a cliff.
    Total sales are still increasing every month.

  120. Exactly my point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Stephen Hawking and Allan Greenspan have both admitted they fucked up, and both are still considered brilliant.

    That is correct. They are brilliant because (just as I stated), they learn from mistakes, and (as you said) are willing to admit they were wrong.

    You'll only see Apple Haters issues excuses, not apologies. You'll never see one admit they were wrong about Apple. despite repeated errors.

    Thus, they exhibit only a distinct lack of brilliance.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  121. this is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the iPad isn't destroying netbook sales. netbooks are destroying netbook sales. have you ever used a netbook? No? Well if you did, you'd know why they stink.

    Despite the fact netbooks are slow, you can't replace a netbook with an iPad unless all you do is read mail and browse the web. It's silly to think a device with no input or output can match a device with much more.

    there are a million apple fanboys out there and those are the people buying the ipads. everyone else who isn't part of the apple cult and realizes that steve jobs is just another man who puts his pants on one leg at a time, isn't impressed with the ipad in the least.

  122. Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or everyone who wants a netbook already has one?

  123. Isn't the only reason by mrdtr · · Score: 1

    Don't most netbooks now come with the crappy Windows 7 Starter? It also seems they are more expensive then ever. You can just buy a low end regular laptop for just a bit more money. There are far more reasons than simply just the iPad.

  124. bounceback.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and when the ipad horde realise that their ipads are _not_ netbooks, netbook sales will rise once again.

  125. Re:Or is it 12 million iPads vs 20 million Netbook by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Wow some mac zealot really has an agenda. Not only did he mark my previous comment a troll, but this one too! Thanks anonymous mac guy! :)

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  126. Don't bet on it by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    Do yourself a favor and buy Atomic Web browser for iPad. It's only $0.99 and it does all of the things you want to do. Tap and hold on a link and choose "open in a background tab". Supports ad-block, private browsing (porn mode), full screen browsing, user agent switching, etc.

    Sorry, that app's been banned from the App Store. Steve Jobs could not be reached for comment.

    (Well, it hasn't happened yet, but I wouldn't risk $800 on a device with a browsing experience the grandparent described, on the gamble it won't happen any time soon.)

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Don't bet on it by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that app's been banned from the App Store. Steve Jobs could not be reached for comment.

      No, it hasn't been banned, and it was approved by Apple. It uses the same WebKit rendering engine that Safari does, it just has a nicer interface.

      This link takes you to the iTunes store.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  127. Wow! by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

    So uncanny is the iPad's ability to destroy Netbook sales, it reached into the future and began causing their decline before its release and even before its announcement. That's amazing!

  128. Nokia Is Destroying Ipad Sales by mdwh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Incorrect - the Ipad was hyped and advertised for several months. The 30 days was simply the final shipping time.

    Not to mention that's been with vast amounts of coverage and advertising from the media, including Slashdot.

    Compared to any given Netbook product

    Can you tell me which specific netbook product gets three stories on Slashdot a day? Thanks. Hell, we don't even get that much for netbooks as a whole.

    Nokia ship hundreds of millions of mobile computing devices a year - do we get stories about them, or how they're "destroying netbook sales" (or indeed, how they're "destroying Ipad sales")?

  129. I'm a Slashdotter, and I love my iPad by jdigriz · · Score: 1

    I got my iPad the day they came out. I knew it would be an amazing technology experience because I had used an iPhone for 3 years before that. The iPad is responsive and light. It's instant-on. It's not designed to replace a full-size computer; its design includes the premise that you already have a full computer of some sort to sync it with. It's not designed to replace a netbook for a hard-core techie. I have a netbook for when I need to go into a server closet somewhere and physically interface with a machine, whether via ethernet cable or USB to serial adapter. Honestly, I wouldn't want to risk my iPad in that environment. It's made of glass and a nearly-disposable 9 inch netbook is a much safer bet. So what's the iPad for? The iPad is for instant, trouble-free interaction with the web (minus flash of course). The iPad is for checking your email, reading an ebook, checking a PDF manual, listening to a podcast, listening to streaming radio, watching Weather radar, or watching a film or tv show via netflix. It's also good for games. I've ordered pizza with it, made skype phone calls with it, banked with it, filed my state sales tax reports with it. Any time I have both my iPhone and my iPad within reach I invariably reach for the iPad to do something online, because it's much easier than squinting at a tiny screen and constantly having to zoom in. When I'm out and about, I use my iPhone and don't bring my iPad, because the big advantage of the iPhone is portability (well, that and cellular calls). I've downloaded the iWork productivity suite, and it's cool, but I don't see myself using it too much, as I have other full-size computers. But if somebody sent me a document and I needed to make a quick change or I needed to make a presentation it could be quite handy to use the iPad for that with the appropriate cable. I've used it to SSH into my servers, and it works for that, but if I were going to be in for a long session, I'd want to move to a physical keyboard. Which I could do if I bought the keyboard dock or a bluetooth keyboard. Or, if I used one of my full computers. So, in summary, the iPad is not your only computer, it's not intended to be, it's an adjunct. It makes your life easier. It's lightweight net connectivity, somewhat like those Internet Appliances that were touted at the turn of the century, but with excellent multimedia capabilities, more portability and a much much better interface. In some ways, the touch interface for using the web is faster than a mouse, since there's not the lag time of moving the pointer and having to aim it precisely. It feels totally responsive thanks to all the animationw which mask loading times and lags which are so apparent on other smartphones and portable platforms. As the inventors of the progress bar realized, people are willing to wait for the computer if it seems like it is actually doing something. Now, as for the common complaints of the slashdot crowd: No flash : Not a big deal since I have Netflix, which is mostly better than Hulu anyway. Also, the ABC player is good for their content. Youtube HTML5 works well as does CNN's video. Non-removable battery: Also not a big deal, the battery charges fully in about 2 hours, and I've been getting more than the advertised 10 hours out of a single charge routinely. Also the standby time is excellent. Not completely free: I have linux boxes for when I want to maximize freedom. But even so, this concern is overblown with the iPad. A member of the development program can write whatever app he wants for his own iPad and Apple doesn't get to decide whether or not he syncs it onto his device and runs it. Apple's role as gatekeeper only happens when the App store is involved and in that particular case they are deciding on whether or not they want to use their infrastructure to distribute your application to others. I don't think that's unreasonable for a software distributor to be able to decide what software they want to distribute. If there's an issue there, go develop for another platform, we hav

  130. That's what you said you wanted by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Your suggestion for getting $300 device functionality out of a $500 device is to buy a $600 computer and a $100 dev license?

    Anyone technical enough to want the stuff you claim you want is going to need a more powerful computer anyway, so the extra costs you list are irrelevant.

    And you only have to pay $99 if you don't jailbreak, so it's a totally optional charge,

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's what you said you wanted by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      i already have several more powerfull computers, none of which run os x, the extra cost would not be irrelevant, even if i need a new machine, the extra cost of getting a mac over a self-built linux box f similar performance is still significant

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards