Slashdot Mirror


EV Owner Arrested Over 5 Cents Worth of Electricity From School's Outlet

sl4shd0rk writes "It seems you can be arrested in Georgia for drawing 5 cents of electricity from a school's outdoor receptacle. Kaveh Kamooneh was charged with theft for plugging his Nissan Leaf into a Chamblee Middle School 110V outlet; the same outlet one could use to charge a laptop or cellphone. The Leaf draws 1KW/hour while charging which works out to under $0.10 of electricity per hour. Mr Kamooneh charged his Leaf for less than 30 minutes, which works out to about a nickel. Sgt. Ernesto Ford, the arresting officer, pointed out, 'theft is a theft,' which was his argument for arresting Mr. Kamooneh. Considering the cost of the infraction, it does not seem a reasonable decision when considering how much this will cost the state in legal funds. Does this mean anyone charging a laptop or cell phone will be charged with theft as well?"

1,010 comments

  1. Henchman by DudeTheMath · · Score: 3, Funny

    He's obviously in the pocket of Big Oil.

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    1. Re:Henchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he certainly has an agenda, though it's probably more along the lines of "thieving liberals!" than anything oilco-related. There's simply no way to justify his actions short of some personal bias... even if it's just that he's a jackbooted asshole.

    2. Re:Henchman by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      He's obviously in the pocket of Big Oil.

      Well the politicians that write his paycheck certainly are.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Henchman by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's obviously in the pocket of Big Oil.

      He stole the script for Fast and Furious 8.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Henchman by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other news: You can charge a Nissan Leaf with a phone charger....

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Henchman by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Well his last name is FORD.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Henchman by stoploss · · Score: 0

      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!

      Well, you save approximately 8750 seconds (approximately 2.5 hours) over 500 miles if you are going 95 mph instead of 65 mph.

      So, I guess I really *do* need to pass that guy. Thanks for prompting me to do the math!

    7. Re:Henchman by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Speaking of big oil, to answer your signature, you gain 12 minutes for every hundred miles going 75 than 65, a whopping two hours for every 1000 miles! speeding is clearly the way to save time on long road trips!

    8. Re:Henchman by FuzzNugget · · Score: 0

      Spoiler alert: Brian dies.

      (too soon?)

    9. Re:Henchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the real script though
      Where's all the gay sex scenes

    10. Re: Henchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is properly funny. :-)

    11. Re: Henchman by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      They, along with the word "are," apparently went the way of the dodo...

    12. Re:Henchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.11alive.com/news/article/314666/40/Electric-car-owner-charged-with-stealing-5-cents-worth-of-juice

      guy was a douche and got phoned in because he had been told to stay off the school tennis courts.

    13. Re:Henchman by MA179 · · Score: 1

      "You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!" You have a point. IF you are driving a very short distance and it's all on a highway it's not worth it. But where does this happen? My nearest on-ramp is more that 4 miles (more than 8 round trip) away and all single lane residential 30-35 mph (no passing). The highway is minimum 2 lanes, usually 3, sometime 4, and slower traffic is supposed to keep right. If they do that then passing isn't a problem. The problem comes when self righteous people don't keep right because they feel they have the right to slow everyone else down, usually to 55 because they want to enforce "more economical" driving on everyone else. BTW you can be cited for "Failure to keep right" I wish this was enforced. Try driving slow on the left on the Autobahn, you'd become unpopular very fast. And has anyone studied the difference in gas mileage doing 65 vs.75 on a modern vehicle? When I bought my new vehicle in 2012 I did. I commute to work every day, same stretch of highway. I did a week of 55, a week of 65, and a week of 75, and I couldn't measure the difference is gas usage. I was actually trying to see if I could really get what the manufacturer said was the highway mph, I never got closer than 1.1 mph under. But I did see a major difference if I was constantly slowing down and speeding up because people were driving in the left lanes (3 lanes) and weren't passing. And before someone says anything, I was able to maintain speed by going into the office later in the day to avoid the traffic. Lead, Follow, or get the F!@# out of the way.

    14. Re: Henchman by jseale · · Score: 1

      Aww come on, that was a wee bit morbid. Watch yourself.

    15. Re:Henchman by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      Where does this happen? I had a weekly commute across southern Michigan on US 12. Every eight to ten miles, there was another town, and the road widened from two to four lanes, allowing easy passing of anyone I'd been "stuck" behind. I always calculated my time savings (miles to the next town, desired speed, current speed) from a pass before I even checked for oncoming traffic. It did wonders for my blood pressure. I saw way too many people trying over and over, and occasionally making a really risky choice, to pass someone who was doing 53 in a 55 when there were only a couple of miles to the next town. So I'm making this suggestion only that one think before acting. If you can pass safely, by all means, do so. I'm not going to hold you up.

      Also, reflecting my status as a former math teacher, I adjusted the numbers to reflect freeway driving and to get a "nice" answer; I read once that the average freeway commute was about eight miles.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    16. Re:Henchman by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      He's obviously in the pocket of Big Oil.

      He stole the script for Fast and Furious 8.

      5 cents of electricity. Does this mean that a teacher who forgets to turn the lights out from the classroom will be sued for the cost of the electricity that was wasted until the Janitor entered to clean the wastebasket?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    17. Re:Henchman by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      How often do you really drive only 8 miles?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  2. Theft is theft, but... by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

    In most states, Theft under $5 is just a ticket... Theft under 5 cents is a PR nightmare. :)

    1. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In most states, Theft under $5 is just a ticket...

      Citation needed

    2. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Around here anything under $200 of value is just a night in jail.

    3. Re:Theft is theft, but... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

    4. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even driving just 1 MPH over the posted speed limit is punishable by up to a year in jail.

    5. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Holi · · Score: 1

      citation please,

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    6. Re:Theft is theft, but... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      In most states, Theft under $5 is just a ticket... Theft under 5 cents is a PR nightmare. :)

      Yeah, because nothing gets the attention of the news like someone stealing a nickel's worth of something, while people are all around stealing much more, defacing public/private buildings, driving 15 mph over the speed limit by the thousands, etc. Y'know, ordinary every day, acceptable crime.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Xicor · · Score: 4, Informative

      in texas, they cant even report a theft until it is over 5$.

    8. Re:Theft is theft, but... by computechnica · · Score: 2

      My idiot son stole a 20oz bottle of 7Up at Walmart and had to pay a $200 fine to the Norman, OK court and $100 fee to Walmart.

    9. Re:Theft is theft, but... by JonWan · · Score: 4, Funny

      We just shoot them and then call the police. :-)

    10. Re:Theft is theft, but... by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Citation needed

      If you need a Citation, you can pick one up for a grand or two.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    11. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed

      Are you that worthless and lazy that you can't look it up yourself?

      Here is one example from Texas, it took me about five seconds to look it up. No, I am not going to look up each state for you.

      Less than $50, or less than $20 if by check - Class C misdemeanor - A fine of not more than $500

    12. Re:Theft is theft, but... by berashith · · Score: 1

      does anyone even bother paying for a soda then ?

    13. Re:Theft is theft, but... by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      Dear Anonymous,
      A ticket is also known as a Citation....
      Word play....

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    14. Re:Theft is theft, but... by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Citation needed

      Here you go, but pretty sure it's not an EV.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    15. Re:Theft is theft, but... by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Damn. He could have bought a lot of 7up for that kind of money.

    16. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My idiot son stole a 20oz bottle of 7Up at Walmart and had to pay a $200 fine to the Norman, OK court and $100 fee to Walmart.

      Did he learn his lesson? A case could be made for what construes a reasonable punishment (sounds a little high) but if you don't want the penalty, don't steal.

    17. Re:Theft is theft, but... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2

      citation: a reference to a published or unpublished source
      Citation: a compact car made by Chevrolet

    18. Re:Theft is theft, but... by frootcakeuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like a great excuse to charge $5+ for a bottle of pop

      --
      Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
    19. Re:Theft is theft, but... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If someone makes an unsubstantiated claim, it is their responsibility to do the research and post the citation, not the 100,000 people reading the remark.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    20. Re:Theft is theft, but... by ericloewe · · Score: 0

      How about you give him a proper upbringing instead of calling him "my idiot son"?

    21. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and report the bullets as stolen.

    22. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most states, Theft under $5 is just a ticket...

      Citation needed

      Yes, they cite them!

    23. Re:Theft is theft, but... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Georgia Police don't care much about PR.

    24. Re:Theft is theft, but... by daem0n1x · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But theft above one billion entitles you to a government bailout and "free from jail" card.

      Stealing bucks is for losers!

    25. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation: also called a ticket, given by police officers to motorists for traffic violations

    26. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, I forgot how ugly those cars were

    27. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shut up with that. People are getting crazy with the "citation" nonsense.

    28. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wooshing sound you hear.. That was the point speeding past you.

    29. Re:Theft is theft, but... by jxander · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Theft may be theft ... but is this theft?? And I don't even care about the ridiculously low monetary value

      IANAL, and I certainly haven't read through the EULA and TOS associated with the wall plug in question ... but it sounds like something provided by the school for students and teachers to use on their personal electronics. Which is exactly what he was doing.

      Seems more like stuffing your pockets full of "free samples." A bit tacky, maybe a wrist-slappable offense, but certainly not theft.

      You (i.e. the school and/or cops) don't get to retroactively go back and say "We meant any personal electronics EXCEPT cars! Yeah, so you're in violation, arrest him"

      --
      This signature is false.
    30. Re: Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Citation needed.]

    31. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A case could be made

      Yes, for $300, many cases of 7up.

    32. Re:Theft is theft, but... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      A proper upbringing means taking responsibility for one's actions. Given the tone of the post, I'm going to say that there were some consequences for the young man beyond what the county gave him. Grounding, chores, and other consequences seem likely to me.
      After having a good upbringing and you still make bad choices, then you deserve to be called an idiot.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    33. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone makes an unsubstantiated claim, it is their responsibility to do the research and post the citation, not the 100,000 people reading the remark.

      What fucking planet are you from, suggesting the above on Slashdot? Good luck with that campaign, moron.

    34. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      ...and report the bullets as stolen.

      ... just remember that you have to empty a at least one 10 round pistol clip into the guy before you've hosed off five dollars worth of ammo.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    35. Re: Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YMMD

    36. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Some people are idiots regardless of upbringing. Nice of you to judge a person from one sentence they wrote.

    37. Re: Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll pop you!

    38. Re: Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that radar guns are not accurate and are highly affected by various circumstances, a 1mph delta can never be proven beyond doubt. As with all measurement gadgets there are tolerances to be considered.

    39. Re:Theft is theft, but... by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      And here I thought they were a bit more expensive than a grand or two.

    40. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The real crime being punished was in having an electric vehicle in a red state.

    41. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Also did the school official complain about the theft? The person was there with his son at the tennis courts. Presumably if they were not arrested for tresspassing then they had implicit permission to be at the school. This leaves it up to the school officials to determine if the guest privileges were abused, not the police.

    42. Re: Theft is theft, but... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Not if you have a magnum

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    43. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ok, I read a different story and it changes the perspective. Apparently the school had told this person to stop using the tennis courts without permission. So he was not an implicit guest.

    44. Re:Theft is theft, but... by jxander · · Score: 1

      If the guy had already been warning about trespassing, then that might be worth investigating ... but the "theft" is certainly not.

      Next thing you know, some local gas station is going to arrest some one for using the restroom without buying anything. "The sign clearly says 'restroom is for customers only.' He stole the water used to flush! Lock him up!"

      --
      This signature is false.
    45. Re: Theft is theft, but... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      If I had a magnum I wouldn't need a gun.

    46. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me that inconsequential theft (charging your phone, car, or whatever else) is a lot closer to taking extra napkins or ketchup at McDonalds that you don't need. (Good gawd yesterday I threw out all the extra fastfood condiments stuff that had collected in my fridge)

      Yes there have some value, but it's inconsequential when it doesn't affect -everyone- else who uses the same facility.

      I could see the school being terribly upset if everyone had a EV and plugged in at the same time, thus repeatedly tripping breakers and fuses, causing paid staff to have to waste their time. It's like when you go to the airport and every outlet is in use by everyone with a laptop, and you decide to unplug something the airport staff is using. That's when it's a problem.

      Grocery stores just write off theft as shrinkage, so should schools/businesses who have outside power receptacles near parking lots.

    47. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Where? In many states it's actually illegal for the police to issue a citation if you're within 5MPH of the speed limit. My former home state of Pennsylvania being one of them.

    48. Re:Theft is theft, but... by mysidia · · Score: 3

      My idiot son stole a 20oz bottle of 7Up at Walmart and had to pay a $200 fine to the Norman, OK court and $100 fee to Walmart.

      Big difference. The 20oz bottle of 7Up is a product on display for sale that has a price printed on it.

      This incident is more like getting a $200 fine or jail time after exiting the rest room at the Walmart, due to having "stolen" $0.01 of water and sewage used by flushing the toilet, $0.07 of toilet paper flushed down the toilet, $0.03 of soap used to wash the hands: all because you also dumped an extra half gallon bucket of horse poop down the potty, that came from your horse parked in the outside lot.

      But the water service belongs to walmart, and theft is theft: right?

    49. Re:Theft is theft, but... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      We just shoot them and then call the police. :-)

      In Texas; you are actually required to call in the police now, instead of just the garbage pick-up company, when that happens?

    50. Re:Theft is theft, but... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great excuse to charge $5+ for a bottle of pop

      It's $15 bucks; with a 33% discount/instant rebate available at checkout, if you actually pay for it, and the item appears on your ticket.

    51. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the original source article: http://www.11alive.com/news/article/314666/40/Electric-car-owner-charged-with-stealing-5-cents-worth-of-juice

      Theft may be theft ... but is this theft??

      Yes.

      it sounds like something provided by the school for students and teachers to use on their personal electronics. Which is exactly what he was doing.

      Nope. He was not a teacher, nor was he a student. In fact, he'd already been told by the school he wasn't allowed on the property because he'd caused problems in the past.

      Thing is, the cop didn't know this at the time. And the cop didn't arrest him, he just wrote up a report. Later, the police did some followup, found that the guy was already banned from use of the grounds (including the outlet), and as a result issued a warrant.
      The cop who initially responded also said that if the guy would have just said "Oops, sorry" there never would even have been a report. He filed one because the guy was a complete asshat about the whole thing.

    52. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Trapick · · Score: 1

      So why not just steal $4.99 worth of stuff, 500 times?

    53. Re:Theft is theft, but... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      ...and report the bullets as stolen.

      ... just remember that you have to empty a at least one 10 round pistol clip into the guy before you've hosed off five dollars worth of ammo.

      I take it you haven't priced ammo lately. (Or you are talking about the New York 5 round clips) :)

    54. Re:Theft is theft, but... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      We just shoot them and then call the police. :-)

      In Texas; you are actually required to call in the police now, instead of just the garbage pick-up company, when that happens?

      You need a police report if you want insurance to cover replacing the blood stained carpet.

    55. Re:Theft is theft, but... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      If someone makes an unsubstantiated claim, it is their responsibility to do the research and post the citation, not the 100,000 people reading the remark.

      Oh yeah? Prove it! :)

    56. Re: Theft is theft, but... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      [Citation needed.]

      OK.

      Oh shut up with that. People are getting crazy with the "citation" nonsense.

    57. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      ...and report the bullets as stolen.

      better pump a load in ... you need quite a few used bullets to be worth $5.

    58. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wouldn't a bullet cost less than 5c? You'd have to use some sort of an automatic weapon to get over $5 worth of bullets into them I guess.

    59. Re: Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed

    60. Re:Theft is theft, but... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I saw where he hid the bullets, officer. You'll find them in his back.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    61. Re:Theft is theft, but... by rioki · · Score: 1

      No you only sell them in packs of 6. Steal one, you steal 6...

    62. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      "We received a 911 call advising that someone was plugged into the power outlet behind the middle school. The responding officer located the vehicle in the rear of the building at the kitchen loading dock up against the wall with a cord run to an outlet. ... the decision [to arrest] was based on Mr. Kamooneh having been [previously] advised that he was not allowed on the property without permission. Had he complied with that notice none of this would have occurred. Mr. Kamooneh's son is not a student at the middle school and [the son] was not the one playing tennis"

    63. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Georgia (not this county though), but there is more to the story that my local radio station investigated. Mr Kamooneh had previously been instructed he was not allowed to be on the school property. He has kids that do not attend that school but he was scheduling private tennis lessons and using the school tennis courts for the lessons without permission. Commercial use of school property requires permission.

      The officer's report states that when he went to interview Mr. Kamooneh at the tennis courts, Mr. Kamooneh started claiming that the officer had damaged his car door but the officer pointed out that the damage was visible when he drove up and that damage was captured on the police car video camera as he drove up. The station reported that the officer stated that had Mr. Kamooneh not attempted to claim the car was damaged by the cop, no report would have been filed. But since the threat was made, the officer needed to ensure his paperwork was in.

      After reviewing the report and talking to the school officials who informed the Chamblee police about Mr Kamooneh's continued use of school facilities without permission, the decision was made to arrest Mr. Kamooneh. Theft of the electricity is supposedly only one of the potential charges, not the only one.

    64. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not any more. (At least not unless you've gotten a danged good price on that .22 LR.)

      Typical low prices I've found online lately for bulk ammo purchases (250 rounds or more): .22 LR: $0.06-$0.10/round
      9mm FMJ: $0.25-$.30/round
      9mm JHP: $0.40-$0.75/round .40 S&W FMJ: $0.25-$0.30/round .40 S&W JHP: $0.50-$0.80/round

      If you can find those prices locally, that's great. If not, you're looking at an additional $12-$15 hazmat fee for shipping. (The reason you'll only ever want to buy ammo online in bulk.)

    65. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      A citation from the police is bad. A citation from the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries is good.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    66. Re:Theft is theft, but... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2

      If someone makes an unsubstantiated claim, it is their responsibility to do the research and post the citation, not the 100,000 people reading the remark.

      Or else...?

      I'm pretty damn sure there's a fairly wide history of casual conversation not requiring footnotes. You know, among human beings. Also, primary research, opinions and soapbox ranting is perfectly fine in the real world. We're not living la vida Wikipedia and trying to write an encyclopedia here. We're nattering on about interesting, ephemeral topics.

      I'll bet you're a blast at parties. "Hey, this is a pretty good beer." "Not NPOV! Citation needed!" Actually, having one guy become apoplectic in that manner at a party would be kind of fun to watch.

      You're absolutely correct in the right context: my wife publishing a journal article has to provide citations. But Slashdot is not a academic journal, and is much closer to a bunch of people on a porch with a six pack. Social context: important!

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    67. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Xicor · · Score: 1

      because that would add up to 500x4.99, which would be well above the point at which you could be charged.

    68. Re:Theft is theft, but... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      That Chevy was horrible, nobody needs one.

    69. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then just plug in and grab $0.05 worth of electricity there. I'm sure you'll be cited, and your needs fulfilled.

    70. Re: Theft is theft, but... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I'm Texas, to save money they now require murder victims to draw their own chalk outlines. Not much per case, but it adds up with the volume.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    71. Re: Theft is theft, but... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid somebody whose house had a view of the local drive in got arrested when they discovered he had tapped into their speaker system; they charged him with theft of electricity, i imagine there not being a law regarding theft of audio signal. That would make this guy's nickel theft look like grand larceny. See, this is what happens when you don't know about parabolic mikes.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    72. Re:Theft is theft, but... by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

      Your analogy sucks. Walmart has PUBLIC restrooms. That means they are offering its services, usage and water for free. Its not theft just because the 7 Up is for sale and has a price printed on it. It has a monetary value that the victim of the theft would have had to pay for if the thief wasn't caught. In this situation there is no analogy needed. It was a guy stealing electricity. If the school had this outlet obviously located and dedicated for people to charge their phones or laptops that would be a different situation. They did nothing of the sort. Some jackass thought he would get away with stealing because hey, its such a small amount he's stealing so no one would ever be mad, right? Did he ask permission or offer to pay for the electricity beforehand? Nope. He even admitted that he routinely steals from publicly accessible outlets and never asks permission because its always such a small amount. If I ever walked out of my house and saw that a neighbor had plugged into the outlet on the side of my house I would definitely call the cops. What kind of entitled douchebag would ever think it was ok to steal so long as it was a small amount? Walk into a bank, reach over the counter and grab a nickel and see if you don't get arrested.

    73. Re:Theft is theft, but... by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Shoplifting is kind of a special class of theft though and treated a bit differently. Even at that though a lot of brick and mortar stores factor "shrinkage" into their prices and just kind of assume that some amount of shoplifting is going to happen and just catch and prosecute whom they may.

    74. Re:Theft is theft, but... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      ...and report the bullets as stolen.

      ... just remember that you have to empty a at least one 10 round pistol clip into the guy before you've hosed off five dollars worth of ammo.

      Hollowpoints and rifle ammo may add up to more than $5 before you empty the magazine.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    75. Re:Theft is theft, but... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Your analogy sucks. Walmart has PUBLIC restrooms. That means they are offering its services, usage and water for free.

      Maybe so, but you won't see that advertised anywhere. They sometimes even have "Employees Only" signs, that some folks ignore.

      People use restrooms all the time, without getting permission from anyone, or there being a sign that restrooms are free as a courtesy to the public.

      More so even than water... Electricity is an intangible asset; not an "object" that is capable of being stolen.

      Electricity is not a "thing", like a coke bottle, or even a glass of water; it is the presence of a charge that is enabled to produce a current.

      It makes about as much sense to say "took someone's electricity" as it does to say "took their light", by staring at their lightbulb.

      They don't even "own" it when it's not in use ---- the OUTLET is their property. Electricity is a metered utility that flows through their property, not a thing that someone's taken.

      If someone breaks into your outdoor outlet... and plugs something in; they have not "Stolen" your outlet. They have trespassed on your premises, and committed a fraud by using a metered service in your name.

    76. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Genes vs environment? Loses both ways.

    77. Re:Theft is theft, but... by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      What website are you on?

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    78. Re:Theft is theft, but... by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

      Are you from the United States where this occurred? Only asking because it sounds like you are talking out of your ass with a complete lack of understanding of all aspects of this situation. Walmart always has signs up indicating where their public restrooms are. The giant sign that says restrooms is understood to be for public use because they are publicly advertised. You are definitely correct that if someone went into an employee only restroom they would not seek to have you charged with theft because trespassing is a more serious charge. You are also correct that electricity is not an object that can be handled or actually taken like a bottle of soda, however it is definitely quantifiable and has value. You need to read up on theft of services. Its a different part of law than theft of property but it still counts as theft and at a minimum is a misdemeanor in most places. Most minor misdemeanors where the cop didn't actually see the crime occur will only result in a ticket and/or a summons to court but if a person admits to committing a misdemeanor or they are caught in the act the can be arrested for it.

    79. Re: Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he did ask and was specifically told not to plug in. Reading comprehension fail.

    80. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public buildings are required by federal law to provide public water and utilities (likely for free).

      If the law wasn't there, places would be under no obligation to bother, and likely would not bother. Until someone crapped all over the floor. Which is a BIT more damaging than having a toilet in the first place.

    81. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the old song...

      "Mama...don't let your boys grow up to drive Eee-Lec-Tric CARS!"

    82. Re:Theft is theft, but... by shadoelord · · Score: 1

      Big difference. The 20oz bottle of 7Up is a product on display for sale that has a price printed on it.

      This incident is more like getting a $200 fine or jail time after exiting the rest room at the Walmart, due to having
      "stolen" $0.01 of water and sewage used by flushing the toilet, $0.07 of toilet paper flushed down the toilet, $0.03 of soap used to wash the hands:
      all because you also dumped an extra half gallon bucket of horse poop down the potty, that came from your horse parked in the outside lot.

      Except Walmart is required to provide public restrooms.

      Don't use other people's plugs.

      --
      this is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
    83. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit they'll give you the chair in Texas for looking at someone the wrong way.

    84. Re:Theft is theft, but... by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      we need that in NZ, here speedometers can be 10kph or more out if the tyres are near end of life or incorrect size for the vehicle, and they're wanting to fine people for 4kph over the posted limit.

    85. Re:Theft is theft, but... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, IIRC our federal laws state that speedometers must be within 5MPH of the true speed, up to 55MPH, in order to be road legal. Which I believe is the basis for laws requiring you to be more than 5MPH over the limit to issue a citation...although again only certain states have such laws. And of course if you're over 55 (generally the max legal limit is 65, although it goes up to 80 in some states) it can be off by more than 5MPH anyway.

    86. Re:Theft is theft, but... by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      ha, my last toyota hilux was raised 4.5" on 35" tyres, it was easily 20kph out at 100kph (speedo reading around 80) next time I'm getting one with aftermarket diffs to suit the big tyres. 5th gear was almost unusable and mpg sucked. it still passed the NZ warrant of fitness. (street legal)

  3. Cop was "in his car"? by Pope · · Score: 5, Interesting

    from Ars:

    "A short time later, he noticed someone in his car and went to investigate—and found that the man was a Chamblee police officer. "

    So, cops just randomly enter other people's cars? I know I used to always lock mine if I wasn't in it.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like an illegal search to me. Personally I would have called 911 and reported that there was someone in my vehicle who should be there. This way had it been someone dangerous the cops would be the ones dealing with it and in this case there would have been an audio recording of the event probably with the 911 dispatcher mentioning that the cop is who is in their car.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > So, cops just randomly enter other people's cars?

      Of course not. They pretend to see drugs on the floor of other people's cars, then perform a search of a suspect vehicle. Nothing random about it.

    3. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      and of course I missed it when proof reading. Change :
      who should be there
      to:
      who shouldn't be there

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I see is someone poking around a car... Guy walks up gets mad. Turns out guy poking around is cop. Yelling match ensues. Guy arrested for whatever the cop can think of.

    5. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      not illegal to enter a vehicle being used in the commission of a crime in progress

      yes this stealing of elecricity was wrong and illegal, electric vehicle owners have no right to plug in whereever they find an outlet.

    6. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope the cop had probable cause because the vehicle owner was plainly stealing power. The vehicle was part of a crime.
      Odd how everyone thinks its ok to steal a little electricity, is it also ok to siphon some gas out of a school bus?

    7. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Talderas · · Score: 4, Informative

      Theft of service is the specific crime, I believe. You can get charged with this for throwing trash in a dumpster that doesn't belong to you or you have permission to use.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    8. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      We're talking about GA. If the owner had been carrying a gunw hen investing the person in his car at night, this could have been very different.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    9. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It only makes sense to enter a vehicle when it's necessarily to do so. In this case, it wasn't. Nice job helping give the government powers it shouldn't have, you piece of trash. I bet you're a TSA supporter, too.

    10. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother had a cop randomly search the bed of his truck while he was at a friends place watching a football game. The cops said he thought the truck was abandoned because it had been parked there for a long time, that is after he got out of the hospital. Apparently he wasn't paying attention to the tools and fishing gear and somehow managed to get his finger chopped off.

      My brother didn't press charges he just laughed and laughed.

    11. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its not so much about being ok or not being ok....its about it being such a small amount that anyone making any sort of a deal over it is....kind of an asshole.

      If I caught someone stealing 5 cents from me, it would be unlikely to garner more than a "hey what the fuck man".

      There is being right, and there is being an asshole who is right.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    12. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, cops just randomly enter other people's cars? I know I used to always lock mine if I wasn't in it.

      Well, maybe.

      I don't know about Georgia, but in my neck of the woods it is illegal to leave your car unlocked.

      A police office can write you a ticket for that - they open the door, put the ticket inside, lock the car, and close the door.

    13. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      How does the cop verify the car was actually charging without looking at the instrument panel inside the car?

    14. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      He stole 5c this time. How many times has this guy done it without being caught? How many times in the future would he have, if no one told him it was theft?

    15. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by GameMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IANAL but as I believe (as others have pointed out) it's not illegal for a police officer to enter a vehicle being used in the commission of a crime (at least in all the US municipalities I'm familiar with). However, that said, the more I think about it the more I believe you've just touched on the REAL reason for the absurd $0.05 theft of service charge. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the cop is using that as a way to legalize what would otherwise have been an illegal fishing expedition searching through the guy's car for more serious contraband. If he didn't charge the guy with SOMETHING, he risks becoming the criminal.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    16. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He stole 5c this time. How many times has this guy done it without being caught? How many times in the future would he have, if no one told him it was theft?

      In the video he admits he'd done it before at the school. And that 20 minutes was only because he got caught. He'd planned to charge for longer. I listened to the interview and he never explains why he plugged in a the school. Was it to have enough power to make it home or was it to lower his electric bill? If the money didn't matter, then just charge it at home.

    17. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by jheath314 · · Score: 2

      Exactly... he could have done it a hundred times, in which case he would have stolen five whole dollars worth of electricity. This is super serious stuff, people.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    18. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      It's illegal to leave your car unlocked? Eh? Try that again. WTF? Sorry, FFS.

      Leave. Just leave. The world's big enough you don't need to live somewhere like that.

      If your lawmakers are capable of doing something as petty as this in public, what's going on behind the scenes?

    19. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      riiiiggghhhttt, because the owner certainly didn't notice the police car nearby? I long for the good ol' days when the cops could beat the shit out of hippies and no one gave a damn.

    20. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Given that the truck bed is on the outside, I'm not sure that looking through it constitutes a search. Maybe if there's a tarp or something it is, but otherwise stuff just sitting there is out in the open.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is illegal to leave a car running while unattended in many places, but i have never heard of it being illegal to leave a car unlocked.

    22. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      If you're getting gas from a diesel school bus can you turn this water to wine?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    23. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by blue+trane · · Score: 0

      If the bus had a gas pump on its side, yes. It's a public resource. Outlets in schools should be free for all to use.

    24. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by blue+trane · · Score: 0

      Why is it theft, in the first place? And, even if it was, why can't you issue a warning?

    25. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Minwee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      not illegal to enter a vehicle being used in the commission of a crime in progress

      yes this stealing of elecricity was wrong and illegal, electric vehicle owners have no right to plug in whereever they find an outlet.

      Gasoline powered cars produce exhaust which contains noticeable amounts of poisonous gases such as carbon monoxide and sulphur dioxide. Clearly the driver of any vehicle putting such dangerous chemicals into the atmosphere (Where children might inhale them. Won't somebody please think of them?) is committing attempted murder which is wrong and illegal, so that makes just about any car in the country fair game.

    26. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Minwee · · Score: 1

      It's illegal to leave your car unlocked? Eh? Try that again. WTF? Sorry, FFS.

      Yes, it is.

      The official story is that the local police felt their time was better spent writing tickets than chasing down stolen cars.

    27. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      I think the officer will have a hard time proving this in court, though. Unless someone who works for the school or the district made a complaint, it would be hard to prove that 1) that he did not have permission from someone or 2) the school even saw it as theft. This is like someone saying that you stole wifi from an open wireless router.

      In many states you can legally shoot someone if they are on your property (wouldn't at all be surprised if Georgia is one of those states). I know its illegal to carry firearms onto school grounds in many states, but the man could have been perfectly justified if he came back to his car, saw someone strange sitting in it, and opened fire.

      Also, if the officer cannot prove the theft charge, he can be charged with either illegal searches or breaking and entering. If any judge is in his right mind, the man will get off, and the officer will be disciplined.

    28. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      It became illegal here to have a car unlocked like 10 years ago.
      Sales of remote car starters increased.
      I think it was mainly due to the rare car-thefts of people going outside, starting the car, and then letting it warm up outside while they get ready in the cold winter mornings.

    29. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      I doubt conceal-carry or right-to-defend laws will protect someone if used in defense of a cop-killing incident.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    30. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by mi · · Score: 2

      By observing a cable running from the outlet to the car? Theft — or attempted theft (if the outlet happened to be dead) is a certainty. No need to enter the vehicle...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    31. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll grant that a nickel's worth isn't enough to hang him over... but what we're up against here is the tragedy of the commons. One person doing it has little to no impact on the scheme of things, but once people decide it's OK for him to do it, why not me too? And my neighbor. And the 600 other people in the immediate vicinity. You can't let him get away with it and then run us off, that's discrimination!

      This isn't about stopping that one guy from helping himself to a nickel's worth of electricity. It's about setting a precedent before it gets out of hand. I'm normally as anti-authority, anti-government as they come* but I can see the need to stop this early.

      *And with that comment out in the open, I'd like to wish cheery holiday greetings to my fans at the NSA

    32. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by mi · · Score: 1

      It's illegal to leave your car unlocked?

      While it may be illegal in some municipalities, in some others it is even worse... It is racist to leave a car unlocked or otherwise cause a poor to commit a crime.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    33. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      So if someone breaks into your house by opening a window and takes nothing, or in your example $.05 ... thats ok?

    34. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      It should be okay to GIVE the school electricity, correct? And it is okay to steal $0 worth of electricity. And if N=0. it is okay to steal n+0.05 worth of electricity. So mathematically speaking, taking electricity is okay for any value of n.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    35. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      "Gee, I wonder what that power cable running from a power outlet to that car's charging port is doing..."

    36. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except this is a "commons" that doesn't have to be common. I don't know about this school or how far from the car it was but.... I have an electrical outlet on the outside of my house. Its not very close to the street, and I STILL have it on a switch which is inside the house.

      Fact is, they put it out there, in public, where people could use it. If they put up a water fountain would they arrest people for stealing water when they drank from it?

      Personally, I am perfectly ok with setting the precedent that if you put something that looks like a service out in public with no control over it whatsoever, you are giving them implicit license to use it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    37. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Fine. Get a law passed to that effect.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    38. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Now multiply $5 by the number of people willing to steal power and you see why we need to crack down. Same reason you give $100 fine to someone for littering. It's way disproportionate, but if everyone does it we have a big fat mess.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    39. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Nothing if the cars battery was already full, or the outlet wasn't turned on, or the cable was faulty, or the circuit breaker had tripped.

    40. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Stealing a service is still theft.
      If I by-pass my power meter and get free power from the power company, is that not stealing?
      Perhaps its better for a judge to decide, since there appears to be no precedent yet. Police officers are not judges.

    41. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Observing the cable only tells the office a crime is in progress. What the crime is and the ability to prosecute it requires gathering evidence.

      If you see a dead body with no head, why is an autopsy still performed? There's a big difference between killing someone and mutilating a corpse.

    42. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Breaking into a house is a crime even if nothing is stolen.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    43. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      F for subject mastery
      C for effort

      Going back to my own post which you replied to:
      "Its not so much about being ok or not being ok....its about it being such a small amount that anyone making any sort of a deal over it is an asshole"

      So your entire proof is irrelevant.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    44. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      It's a search if he touches anything. Just looking at what any passer-by can see, is not.

    45. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I ran a yellow light once - wasn't red until after it became invisible above my windshield/roof line, probably well after.

      Cop pulls over onto the grass and charges past 6 cars, throwing up mud-grass rooster tails just so he can pull me over, then detains me for 30+ minutes before approaching my vehicle.

      At the end of it, I get a ticket for running a red light, and a verbal admonition: "You can take me to court, but it's my word against yours."

      My theory is that there was a "want" out for a similar vehicle description, probably with a "dangerous" tag attached - and he held on to me until they figured out that I wasn't who they were looking for, then used the ticket as justification. Kinda makes you want to run a dash-camcorder.

    46. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      and if I install a water fountain at the edge of my property by the street with no signage whatsoever, and someone walking by assumes it is for public use and takes a drink...is that not ok?

      Because that is a lot closer to what we are talking about than an invasion of private home, or other building. This is about a guy, out on the street, using a facility that was left, open to use, out on the street.

      Honestly, I don't see any theft at all, that it was free to use seems like a reasonable assumption to me, afterall, why else leave a live outlet out in public, within reach of people (including children)? If anything, the school is negligent and created an attractive nuisance by not leaving it switched off when not in use, or otherwise protecting it from use.

      Hell, I don't even leave the power outlets on the backside of my property switched on when not in use.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    47. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't dealt with lawyers - a law was broken, minimum court costs run about $200, and if you are guilty of breaking the law you'll be the one paying.

      Judges are supposed to mitigate this nonsense, but remember that Judges used to be lawyers, and probably still go out drinking with them.

    48. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that if you're pawing through it enough to accidentally lose a finger, it's a search.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    49. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Since the car owner didn't break into anything, it is clear that you completely understand that someone stealing $.05 from his would be ok with him. You clearly understand that breaking into his house would be a problem. Funny enough, it was the cop who did the breaking in, so you seem to have made a point that was exactly the opposite of what you intended.

    50. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Proof by (electrical) induction, you could say *imaginary pipe puff*

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    51. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      There is also being an asshole who is stealing stuff.

    52. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      No, but if I leave a nickel on the driveway in front of my house, I fully expect someone to pick it up.

    53. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      You can get charged with this for throwing trash in a dumpster that doesn't belong to you

      Its true! Just ask Arlo Guthrie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice's_Restaurant)

    54. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And what law says that students of a school, their parents, or guests of the school, are not allowed to use power outlets while there?

    55. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Also, how did the cop know something was being stolen? Did he go to the school and ask them if it was authorized?

      Seems to me, what he should have done, was first, ask the school, second, if they have a problem, give them the info on the car (which is enough for them to deal with it; including bringing a legal case) and... at most....unplug the car.

      Since he doesn't need to enter the car to find out who the owner is (being registered in a DB he can query) there really is no probably cause to assume anything else is going on which would be uncovered by entering the car.

      At that point, incident is over, stealing has stopped, and the victim has everything they need to decide whether to pursue the issue or not.

      If anything.... the guy was debatably wrong for assuming the outlet was ok to use, but the cop violated his civil rights, which is a much more serious infraction than if the amount stolen was in the hundreds or thousands of dollars.

      The man should get a stern talking to, and be informed he should not do it again. The school should put controls on their power outlets that are out in public spaces....and the cop should GO TO JAIL.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    56. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by ishamael69 · · Score: 1

      Seems justified to me. They had a 911 call from someone about power being stolen.

    57. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out of your mom basement and you will have plenty of chances to see a unmarked police car.

    58. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by ishamael69 · · Score: 1

      Or, cop responds to 911 call about someone stealing electricity. Guy walks up and accuses cop investigating of damaging the car, even when the car was already damaged. Guy has previously been told to stay away from where he was. Cops rightfully arrest him for theft. Seems like a straightforward story to me. I'm unclear as to why everyone is worked up.

    59. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      Depends. If the car owner is black and a white cop is killed in similar circumstances and got charged, the ACLU and mainstream media will be jumping all over it.

    60. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The school officials had told this person in the past to stop using the tennis courts without permission. So ya, no only did he not have permission he had been explicitly told he had no permission.

      The officer responded after there was a 911 call (stories don't say who it was from). The story from the police and the car owner do not agree either.

      The headline makes it a sensationalist story but if it's actually read things start looking a lot murkier.

    61. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      From the official statement:
      "We received a 911 call advising that someone was plugged into the power outlet behind the middle school. The responding officer located the vehicle in the rear of the building at the kitchen loading dock up against the wall with a cord run to an outlet. The officer spent some time trying to determine whose vehicle it was. It was unlocked and he eventually began looking through the interior after verifying it did not belong to the school system."

      Also the car owner had been previously warned to stop using the school's tennis courts, which was where he was located.

    62. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i think they would arrest you if you stuck a hose on the fountain to refill your RV

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    63. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by praxis · · Score: 1

      So, cops should search everything everywhere every time just in case there is something illegal going on? That sounds like a police state I'd rather not live in.

    64. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      "but the man could have been perfectly justified if he came back to his car, saw someone strange sitting in it, and opened fire"
      Is that legal anywhere? in a car sitting ON PUBLIC PROPERTY?

    65. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I am perfectly ok with setting the precedent that if you put something that looks like a service out in public with no control over it whatsoever, you are giving them implicit license to use it.

      I agree, the key element here was this took place on public property, funded entirely by taxes, which presumably he helps pay. He did not circumvent any security device or disobey posted signs. The school put a common household electrical receptacle outside, the school also put drinking fountains on the property for the public to use; water and electricity are both services, and both have value. We don't charge people with theft for drinking public water, and using public electricity is no different, the precedence has been established with water. It would have been trespass and theft had he done this on private property without permission, but this was public property, and permission was implicit when the school installed the receptacle outside.

    66. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, Sgt. Ford did make the decision to pursue the theft charges, but the decision was based on Mr. Kamooneh having been advised that he was not allowed on the property without permission.

      I know it isn't fair to read TFA, but there you go. The man was warned previously by the school that he could not park his car on the tennis court, and he did it anyway. I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure I could find some statutes that he violated.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    67. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      It sounds more like they were highly unsuccessful at finding stolen cars, and realized they could make more money writing tickets.

    68. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by JayBat · · Score: 1

      That's "the lamestream media" to you, racist.

    69. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a bit skeptical of that. There wasn't a crime committed in the car. The crime was outside. If you ask me the cop committed a crime by entering the vehicle when no crime was being committed within. The cop also could not have known with any certainty that a crime was being committed at the time of entrance (since he didn't know and could not have verified that there wasn't permission during this time, and it was apparent from the article, the verification happened later).

    70. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I read the fine article a few minutes after posting that...
      Chalk it up to Slashdot following the Faux News model of creating hysteria.

    71. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's absolutely absurd. "We're going to overreact because you might have done much worse things that we didn't catch you doing!"

    72. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      There already are laws covering exact this. We have inspections that already monitor our cars for acceptable emissions levels. The person you're responding to is just a selfish douche that thinks its okay for him to do whatever he wants because he feels entitled to it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    73. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The one where they school officials ... AND THE COP ... had given him multiple warnings before he was arrested not to do it.

      Do you just go take food out of the cafeteria too? What fucking kind of retarded logic makes you think its okay to steal somethings but not others?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    74. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The battery is never 'full' the car is constantly drawing current and will constantly draw from an outlet just to keep its monitoring equipment on.

      Try again.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    75. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Also, how did the cop know something was being stolen? Did he go to the school and ask them if it was authorized?

      No, moron, the school called the cop. He didn't need to 'ask' the school, THEY CALLED HIM.

      They warned this prick multiple times not to charge his car from the outlet.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    76. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Unless someone who works for the school

      Its almost as if you read the article that talks about the school having an issue with this particular person multiple times before calling the cops ...

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    77. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's tresspassing then.

      and by the way good luck getting the cops to do anything about a 100 dollar bike stolen from the exact same location!

      "theft is theft".. well, sure, but actually in mos western countries there's some other term for items of not so much value(which is how you can not end up in jail for taking a loaf of bread without paying, in most western countries, that is, "petty theft"). also it's a human right that punishment fits the crime(otherwise you can lock up who you want for whatever small thing you can find about them).

      anyhow apparently the school thought he was using the tennis courts without permission... which begs the question why they didn't take him in for tresspassing, a much bigger crime than a theft under a dollar.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    78. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/becoming/being\ exposed\ as/

    79. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      On school grounds, you don't need probable cause. You need reasonable suspicion. The bar is much lower

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    80. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      No, only after they've established something illegal may have happened. Like a car plugged in to a power point stealing power. Without gathering evidence there is no proof power was stolen.

    81. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      And the officer is expected to know this? How is he to establish how much power was stolen? Are magic butterflies going to tell him?

    82. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Askmum · · Score: 1

      Odd how everyone thinks its ok to steal a little electricity, is it also ok to siphon some gas out of a school bus?

      Valid point. In the early ages of mobile phones and PDA's I once plugged in my PDA in a bar. The owner got mad at me for stealing electricity. Oddly enough, I was taken aback and did not understand why this was stealing.

      Although there is a difference between stealing 5 cents worth of electricity and 5 dollars worth, your point is still valid. Why would this be acceptable?

    83. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Antonovich · · Score: 1

      By the time this sort of theft would even merit a mention on someone's energy bill there will have been many more billions put into battery research and the distribution network. This is such a non-issue only /.ers could possibly argue about it. Ever taken a pen from an office after signing something? I can assure you that it wasn't the straw that broke the camel's back if the business is no longer. Many places won't accept theft charges under a certain value for a good reason, for there to be a crime it needs to cause some harm, and this guy was probably (hopefully?) saving someone a minute of their working time by being there (taking a kid off their hands a minute earlier for example), making it probably a net saving to the school...

    84. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I know it is not in our DNA, but seriously - this time - read TFA. They guy was taking tennis lessons at a school his child does not attend. He had been warned previously not to park his car on the tennis court and charge. He did it again, and so they got fed up and called 911.

      All that said, his intent was to steal a lot more electricity - he just got caught after only 20 minutes of charge time. Intent is important. The whole "5 cents" part of the headline is stupid and deliberately misleading.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    85. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Antonovich · · Score: 1

      Ye gads, read the article? Are you serious? I might actually start saying sensible things as opposed to talking out of my nether regions... Seriously though, mea culpa on this one, you are quite right, he was being an arse and deserved to be arrested. My understanding of the article was not that he had been asked not to charge his car there but rather that he should not have been there at all. I do think he should have been charged with something else though... like trespassing.

    86. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      ya....im not talking about CC laws.
      im talking about the owner getting shot by the cop.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    87. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about setting a precedent before it gets out of hand.

      IF I buy your argument, then this is the problem that needs solved.

      You think that arrest is the best way to solve this problem? Arrest is the best (or only?) way to "set a precedent"? How about 1) ask nicely, 2) warn sternly, 3) fine, 4) arrest?

    88. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cop didn't arrest him at the time, he issued the arrest warrant later. If the guy wasn't being a dick, the cop probably wouldn't have bothered and let him off with a warning not to do it again.

    89. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I am perfectly ok with setting the precedent that if you put something that looks like a service out in public with no control over it whatsoever, you are giving them implicit license to use it.

      Yeah really!! Do we all have to start worrying about being arrested when at the airport waiting area and we plug in our smart phone to top off the charge. What about coffee shops that don't have explicit signs saying it's ok to plug in your laptop. But what about my rechargeable toothbrush? Will plugging that in instead of a laptop get me arrested.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    90. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your car is parked on public property.
      You come back to it after a few hours, and see someone you don't know inside.
      Depending on the particular state, yes it might be legal to shoot someone who you believe is in the process of committing grand-theft auto. In Texas, for example, you are allowed to shoot to protect your property. In Ohio, on the other hand, you are not.

      The thing is, based on what we know about the incident, they had the idiot dead to rights on trespassing charges. (He had previously been notified that he was not welcome on the school property.) Arresting him, instead (and days later), for 'theft' of $.05 worth of electricity is bureaucratic idiocy at its finest.

    91. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. If there really was a warrant out for a similar vehicle or similar looking person he wouldn't need any additional justification to hold you there for identification. He was probably just an asshole cop who decided that in "his" town people aren't allowed to make use of the yellow light.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    92. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      What if you ask someone multiple times to stop entering your property and drinking from your water fountain?

      In this situation, he didn't just ignore requests not to stop. To use your analogy, instead of taking a sip from the water fountain he was filling his fire truck from it.

      Providing a convenient and free service works if you are able to prevent people abusing it. The school were providing such a service, which is why it wasn't switched off. He was abusing it.

    93. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. You don't want people "stealing" electricity, don't leave unlocked, unmetered outlets in public places. Lock'em up or put a coin-box and a timer on 'em. WTF?. Do you see people being arrested for drinking from a public fountain, or using a public urinal? Even if they're obnoxious assholes? WTF?

      Look, I'm from Georgia, and I'm in Georgia. The oligarchy here hides behind facade of reactionary, petit-bourgeous crypto-fascist -how shall I put this delicately- DICKHEADS who with deft, willfull obtuseness percieve their own larceny and cupidity in anything else anyone else does. Furthermore, these lowly bigshot wannabes have their legions of zealous minions seeking to brown-nose and impress. So ridiculous things like this happen all the time here. Thanks for making me proud of my State once again, Mr. Chamblee Policeman. The guy probably pays his taxes, so ur effing nickel was covered. If the guy was some other kind of a nuisance, find a relevant charge. "Disturbing the peace" should be dickhead enough for your bosses, and not offend common sense.

    94. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > which begs the question why they didn't take him in for tresspassing

      Do people even get "taken in" for tresspassing? Arrest isn't required for citation or charges. Seems like the proper thing to do would be to cite him, ask him to leave, and then, only if he refuses and makes it clear that he will not leave on his own terms, then arrest him for it sure.

      However, neither trespassing nor 5 cents of electricity, alone or together, justify the expense of an arrest.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    95. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      If your summary is correct, I hope someone at the school also got a fine for the frivolous call to 911.

      Sounds like it wasn't about the theft, it was about being able to charge him with something to show him who's in charge...

    96. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually I am quite familiar with this; but mostly through friends. One friend of mine was caught driving 70ish lbs of pot through Arizona. (yes that is a fuckton of pot, he must have been working for someone but, some details I prefer not to find out)

      He could afford a lawyer so how much time did he do? None. Didn't even have to travel back to Az for trial, all done over the phone.... at great expense. It is so blatantly a money game (especially when its over something so harmless its hard to see how they even justify it aside from making jobs).

      You know if he couldn't afford a lawyer and had a public defender or represented himself, he would have spent a couple of years locked up.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    97. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what he had been warned before? So instead of a stern warning (maybe a citation) from a cop he got arrested. Meaning there was some yelling involved. The cop then arrested him over a petty crime. You usually do not get arrested for petty crimes like this unless you are belligerent. Which at that point most cops will haul you in and let the Sargent/lt/capt figure it out. Considering he had been warned before I would bet cash he was looking for someone to say something.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8

    98. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when I leave my garage door open its giving implicit consent for anyone to borrow my lawn mower...or even take my lawn mower?

      I think your right though about precedents needing to be set with regards to borrowed electricity. Having worked in construction, let me tell you that it definitely is not going to work out well for you if you plug into a neighboring owner's outlets. I would say precedent is pretty clear here, but may not be for most people. Most people assume that they can, say, charge their phone on an outlet anywhere they are....however, people tend to disagree with this for a sufficiently large load.

    99. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the attempted cop killer wouldn't have survived long enough to reach jail? True.

    100. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      In any case, nothing about it gives any indication that searching the inside of his car would likely turn up anything else. The search was still unjustified. So they were both wrong and the cop...was many many times more wrong.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    101. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      It's all about intent. If you knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a peace officer then you are screwedsville. If you couldn't reasonably have known that then you can use that as a defense, but would probably still be slapped with negligent homicide for not properly identifying who the fuck you were shooting at. That is however the difference between 8-10 and capital murder.

    102. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, and a car plugged in is by default stealing power? That seems like a pretty flimsy reason to search a car. "Hold it there sir, you are eating a hamburger, I must ascertains it's not stolen!"

    103. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Same thing around here, it's illegal to leave a vehicle running unattended (you don't actually have to be in the car, but must be close by). But I've never heard of it being illegal to leave a car unlocked.

    104. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      More like, "hold it there sir, you're taking a hamburger from someone who wasn't looking."

    105. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Police do not find stolen cars. They do not look for stolen cars unless it has been used in the commission of a larger crime. You get your car back when someone rings the police and tells them about a vehicle that appears to have been abandoned in their neighbourhood.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    106. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by swalve · · Score: 1

      That is not how anything works. It is not the owner's job (legally) to prevent people from taking their stuff. Theft is theft.

    107. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yes and I am saying the law should be adjusted then.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    108. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by praxis · · Score: 1

      That would imply the cop knew more than just seeing a car that was tethered to a mains. What part being plugged in implies foul play afoot? If he had received a complaint or some such, I might see it differently.

    109. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electricity isn't a service, it is a consumable product with a known volume and rate. He stole a product.

    110. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric cars have emissions to. Should we arrest EV owners for poisoning us with mercury from the coal plants that generate the electricity?

    111. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It provides probable cause. The officer is allowed to search. Its written in law.

      The other option the officer had was to have the car towed and impounded for a parking violation. If that happens the police can search the car without a warrant, including opening any locked compartments or items inside the car.

      The fact is this guy didn't have permission to plug his car in, the officer made a decision based on what he could see and this obviously led him to believe there was probable cause that a crime was taking place.

      He's lucky he did it in Georgia, in some other states he could also be fined for leaving his car unlocked and unattended in public.

    112. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      vehicle owners have no right to plug in whereever they find an outlet.

      I agree. I wouldn't be happy if I came home and someone had parked their car in my driveway and was charging it using the external socket on my patio. Of course, I live in Germany where our electricity costs 28 euro cents (about 38 US cents) per KW.

    113. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because electrons don't have a lot of mass doesn't mean this isn't theft of goods. Stealing electricity is similar to tapping the gas line and stealing natural gas.

      The question is whether he had a reasonable expectation of being allowed to take it, especially in the quantity he did. Nobody would arrest him for stealing water if he drank from the drinking fountain while he was there, because it's there for that purpose. On the other hand, if he came to the school every week and used the outdoor spigot to wash his car, they might (justifiably) feel otherwise.

    114. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Yes, if there is some probably cause, then I will agree. I'm all for probable cause. If we're going to call car plugged into outlet probably cause, then I have a problem with that. I rather not have police enter my car on my property because I was charging it.

    115. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      In many states you can legally shoot someone if they are on your property

      That is grossly oversimplifying the law to the point where this statement is completely and utterly false.

    116. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What if there was someone else's car on your property that were not aware of? Would you rather have the police turn a blind eye?
      Like a plain old Nissan Leaf with no school branding plugged in to a random socket on the schools property.

    117. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      No, but there is an issue of degree of generosity here as well though. I can see a school or park perfectly reasonably being willing to put some outside outlets around for laptops or other general convenience, content to pay for a few ten or hundred watts a few hours a day, and I think it's perfectly reasonable for people to assume publicly accessible power jacks are intended for public use unless otherwise labelled. Certainly I have never felt the need to ask permission before plugging in my laptop in the airport lobby, but having a sudden massive influx of continuous high-wattage loads into the world changes that equation dramatically - instead of pennies a day per outlet it could be dollars.

      Now would be the time to set any precedents we want to establish as to EVs being bound by a different presumption. I would think that it would save a lot of headaches if we established a precedent that EVs are not permitted to plug in to public outlets without express permission - if you actually want to give free charging for EV vehicles permission is easily granted by a sign at the outlet or driveway, perhaps even officially endorse a standard "EV friendly outlet" faceplate design or something that grants permission without all those pesky words.

      The alternatives would seem to be requiring every park, library, private residence, etc. to put up "No EVs" signs on every public outlet, or alternately making all outlets presumed nonpublic unless accompanied by signs granting permission to use them for laptops, etc. Either one requires massive expenditures nationwide just to maintain the status quo in the face of a transportation revolution designed to be interoperable with the existing power infrastructure.

      Maybe take the first steps as well toward establishing a standard reasonable punishment as well - perhaps a fine to pay for a few days or weeks worth of continuous charging, payable to the wronged party, on the theory that you're probably a repeat offender who's gotten away with it many times elsewhere, and they've probably been the victims of many uncaught thieves, so it all averages out.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    118. Re:Cop was "in his car"? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. you got your induction step wrong in (3), back to logic class with you

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  4. That's news to me!! by BLToday · · Score: 1

    I didn't know a Leaf can use regular 110V using standard outlet.

    1. Re:That's news to me!! by olsmeister · · Score: 2
    2. Re:That's news to me!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      portable charging unit.

    3. Re:That's news to me!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most EV's can but they take longer to charge this way

    4. Re:That's news to me!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The charger that the Leaf comes with is 110V. That's all I have at home, it will charge overnight with no problem. The 220V charger (about $1K) charges about 2.5x faster and of course requires a 22V circuit nearby.

      I use 220V at work and around town chargers.

    5. Re:That's news to me!! by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      evseupgrade.com will upgrade your stock Leaf charger to 220V for $290. I have had zero problems with my upgraded unit.

    6. Re:That's news to me!! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Protip: Voltage at your 120V outlet will fluctuate during the day connected to directly to the grid. It can go higher than 130 volts in some areas during peak times. This is why 130V incandescent light bulbs last longer, and why folks should clean the power to their electronics via UPS (uninterpreted power supply, not the brown shirts) in order to prevent disasters such as millions of transistors suddenly melting down in overload before suddenly being silenced... 110V is 120V -- 120V is sort of the defacto observed average, but not the actual maximum or minimum.

      Source: My high multimeter count allows me to sense EM fields -- I'm keenly aware of disturbances in the force.

    7. Re:That's news to me!! by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      What kind of power supplies do you use that don't work with 100~250V?

    8. Re:That's news to me!! by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Nit picking:

      The Leaf's charger is in the car. The thing people call the "charger" is just a smart switching EVSE cable.
      http://www.mynissanleaf.com/wiki/index.php?title=Charging_System

  5. Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too much to expect from some people in charge.

    1. Re:Math is math by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too much to expect from some people in charge.

      It is also too much to expect from journalists and Slashdot editors. 1KW/hr is a meaningless unit. It is clear from context that it is supposed to be just "1kw".

         

    2. Re:Math is math by qeveren · · Score: 2

      They likely meant 1 kW*hr, a unit of energy.

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    3. Re:Math is math by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      1kw is meaningless, without a time period.
      It's a unit of power, not energy.

    4. Re:Math is math by berashith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if you get up to 1.81 jiggawatts, then you can choose your own time period

    5. Re:Math is math by psmears · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1KW/hr is a meaningless unit.

      I agree that it's completely wrong here, but it's not necessarily meaningless: you could legitimately say "The energy consumption was increasing at a rate of 1kW/hr"...

    6. Re:Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm pretty sure they meant kWh per hour, which is kW.

    7. Re:Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 kW

    8. Re:Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe his car was ramping up its power consumption by 1kW/h?

    9. Re:Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1kW *

      There you go.

    10. Re:Math is math by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What are you going to do with the extra 0.6 jiggawatts? You only need one point twenty one jiggawatts to power the flux capacitor.

    11. Re:Math is math by berashith · · Score: 1

      I always mess up some mundane piece of the quote :)

    12. Re:Math is math by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      Only when you hit 88mph.

    13. Re:Math is math by LateArthurDent · · Score: 2

      1kw is meaningless, without a time period.
      It's a unit of power, not energy.

      Right. Which is why 1kW / hr doesn't make any sense. Power is a rate, watts is equivalent to Joules per second. So 1 kW / hour is an acceleration in the draw of energy, or 0.278 J / s^2.

      They also didn't mean 1 kW * hr for their energy, because the rest of the sentence specified that "1 kW / hr" was $0.10 and he parked for less than 30 minutes. So yeah, clearly they meant just 1kW, and the time period is 30 minutes. Or 0.5 kW * hr for the energy.

    14. Re:Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.21, not 1.81. Hand in your nerd card.

    15. Re:Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So 1 kW / hour is an acceleration in the draw of energy, or 0.278 J / s^2.

      True, but the summary talks about kelvin-watts per hour, which is even more exotic.

    16. Re:Math is math by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      That's 1.81 Gigawatts. Doc Brown used the alternative pronunciation, but the spelling is the same.

    17. Re:Math is math by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      It's not meaningless. It's a rate of change, just like m/s^2. As such, the car should pop the breaker somewhere around 108 or 144 minutes of charging, depending on whether the outlet is a 15A or 20A outlet, and assuming the line voltage is a solid 120V. 108 minutes is the point when the power draw would reach 1800W and at 144 minutes, it should hit 2400W, which, at 120V are 15A and 20A respectively, assuming that there is no reactive power involved.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    18. Re:Math is math by omnichad · · Score: 1

      No matter how you pronounce it, nor what scripts you reference, it's still gigawatts.

    19. Re:Math is math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.21 gigawatts (with a soft 'g')

  6. Theft is theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And stupid people is stupid people, what are you going to do?

  7. Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Stealing is stealing. Was it his? Was there a sign saying come use our free power? Is it ok for me to walk up to your house and plug in my car or device to an outside outlet? I am not sure the guy needed to be arrested, a ticket and fine would be in order. BUT it's only a nickel... Yea... Tell that to the store when you steal 5 cents worth of candy, not that any candy is 5 cents anymore... But my point stands.

    1. Re:Theft by schwit1 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right. Lets ticket everyone that takes a drink from the water fountain too.

    2. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't see the difference?

    3. Re:Theft by number17 · · Score: 1

      And sell toilet paper outside the washroom.

    4. Re:Theft by alexander_686 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the water fountain was designed and installed for free water. And there are outlets in public places for free electricity to top off one’s phone. But I don’t think that was the case here. I see this as more akin to your next door neighbor running an extension line over to your home to borrow a little electricity – and failing to tell you. It might be for only a small amount but it is not good behavior. I think that a stern warning might have been better unless it was a chronic problem.

    5. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Want to keep people from accessing something, don't make it open to be accessed.

    6. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stealing may be stealing, but theft isn't theft. The law makes provisions for the magnitude of the theft...how much is stolen is very relevant. Grand theft carries a larger penalty than petty theft which, in turn, has greater penalties than a misdemeanor shoplifting charge.

      It would surprise me if theft of $0.05 resulted in anything beyond a fine. A 1000x fine ($50) should be plenty effective in ensuring that he never does it again.

    7. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look buddy, if you are driving some battery powered ecocrapmobile you are taking one for the team for mother earth. You have the right to steal whatever juice you need to get that overgrown vibrator on wheels moving you back to your eco-hovel.

    8. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To say the magnitude of the crime doesn't matter is just stupid. Sure, he broke the law and stole, but the processing of the legal system itself is more of a punishment than he even deserves. He spend 15 hours in jail and a ton of money and effort in the legal system was wasted. If you think someone should go to jail for any amount of time for this then you are crazy.

    9. Re:Theft by Mullen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here on Earth and not Planet Black and White, there is thing called, "correct response to a problem". Here on Earth, we handout measured punishments based on the actually crime committed and the damage done to the victim. The offender in this case stole 5 cents of electricity. Which, while technically is a crime, is not a large one and not one worth the time of a police officer. If, for some reason, it did come to the attention of a police officer, they should have issued a warning since that may have all that is needed. Having a state employee deal with this is a net loss to society and its people since the officer could be doing other things like chase murders and rapists.

      --
      Linux O Muerte!
    10. Re:Theft by chuckugly · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you wouldn't have done it at a random stranger's house, why would you do it at your children's school without asking?

      The same reason I'd take a piss in the school restroom without asking, but not in yours.

    11. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my neighbor did that, I would simply disconnect the extension cord from my outlet. If he did it a second time, after I disconnected it I would cut the cord at the property line and retain the portion on my premises. I would not call the cops and ask them to arrest someone for this. Kind of like how I don't swing a baseball bat at a house spider.

    12. Re:Theft by Koby77 · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of that banking interest scam where transactions involving fractions of a cent, such as interest, are deliberately rounded incorrectly and the difference deposited into someone else's account (see: Office Space). It looks like the EV owner's defenders would excuse such a scam because the individual transactions are too small. The defenders need to answer some questions, such as-- "How many such transactions would be impermissible?", "If you can identify such a number, why is that number not arbitrary?", and "Would it be okay if me and a thousand commuters passing near your home per day charge our vehicles to your outlet?"

    13. Re:Theft by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Insightful

      De minimis non curat lex. Laws were invented to prevent harm, not categories of behaviour. Your point is fundamentally misguided.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    14. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the point of taxes if one would get arrested !

    15. Re:Theft by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1, Troll

      Well, the water fountain was designed and installed for free water. And there are outlets in public places for free electricity to top off one’s phone. But I don’t think that was the case here. I see this as more akin to your next door neighbor running an extension line over to your home to borrow a little electricity – and failing to tell you. It might be for only a small amount but it is not good behavior. I think that a stern warning might have been better unless it was a chronic problem.

      This might be the case -- but did the school call the police because they saw someone plugging into their power outlet, or did the policeman do this "in the public good"? If the second, he has no jurisdiction. If the first, the school could have just unplugged the car and asked him not to do it again, possibly asking for the 5 cents back to cover expenses.

      We're missing too much of the story here. Why was the officer poking around the car in the first place? How was the owner related to the school? Why was he there? Did he have a history of plugging his car into public outlets? Had he been approached about this before?

      We don't know the answers, so there's really not much of a story here --- at least not in the way it was reported.

    16. Re:Theft by mlts · · Score: 2

      During SXSW in Austin, there would be people who would pull up into driveways without permission, plug their travel trailers into outlets in the nearby house, use the nearby hose for their RV's water, and spend the night there. The homeowner would ask the people to leave, and the RV-ers would say some choice vulgarities. The police finally get called and then the trailer would get moved one driveway over. Without a posted tow away zone sign, the fact that a driveway would be a place to turn into a party spot and RV parking place was taken advantage of fairly often.

      It might be just five cents of power, but it still is theft, same with the people who plug their travel trailer into the wall of someone's house without permission.

      Would this be something to be arrested over? No. In most circumstances, a citation for a class C misdemeanor would be the best matter of course.

    17. Re:Theft by fredprado · · Score: 2

      Water fountains are designed to be used, but not necessarily by everyone. It could be designed for students to use for example, and the exact same line of thought can be applied to outdoor electric outlets. It is also designed to be used. In the absence of strict and explicit rules, anyone accepted in the property should be able to use it, in the same way anyone can use the water tap.

      Notice that in this case the school did not press charges, implying that the school didn't mind the use, or at least judged it to be harmless enough.

    18. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Javert is that you? I thought you had jumped into Seine.

    19. Re:Theft by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I see this as more akin to your next door neighbor running an extension line over to your home to borrow a little electricity â" and failing to tell you.

      Reminds me of a buddy of mine who owned a business, and had contractors working on another building, decide to "use" his power without telling him. Well his solution was to send the company a bill labeled "asshole fee: $250" amazingly it was paid without a second though. I've heard of it happening in other places as well.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    20. Re:Theft by Holi · · Score: 1

      Really, Laws were created to prevent harm? In what world? Laws are created to control the populace.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    21. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're up in arms because you're a shill or have a beef to pick with EVs because of the TV shows you watch. Grow the fuck up.

      There's this thing we do in civilized society called a polite request. You know, we ask somebody not to do something because escalating the incident to an arrest involving a civil office is a giant waste of time and money on everyone' part.

      Talk, leave a note, whatever. Call the cops once concern has been made clear but behavior does not change. Also consider advocating better EV charging infrastructure in your local because EVs are just going to get more popular as petroleum prices rise. Yes, infrastructure includes legal ordinances that say "No, it's not ok to plug in your EV wherever you like. Do so and face a fine"

    22. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if it was 5c or $500

      That is so american!

    23. Re:Theft by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      Its an outdoor plug on publicly accessible property, where CHILDREN might be playing and people might be hosting EVENTS.
      If you don't want the plug to be used, PUT A LOCK ON IT.
      If your electrical system is so shaky and dangerous, PUT A LOCK ON IT.

      We are not talking about someone's house, we are talking about publicly accessible property.

      You don't know if he would have done it or not if the policeman was there. Its likely he didn't think anything of it.
      Its like picking a flower from a park. Im SURE he could be arrested for theft by taking. But no one would think twice about that. Does it mean a cop should ARREST him and throw him in jail for 15 hours with actual criminals?

      He should be warned, maybe even a not put in his file so if he does it a second time he IS arrested. But seriously, this is overkill.

      Just to be CLEAR, I agree he should have been warned, ticketed, reported to the school, etc... But an arrest is ridiculous.

      And your comment about asking and they will provide a safe socket and extension etc...
      - First off, as if a teacher has ANY idea what a safe socket looks like...
      - Secondly, does a teacher or janitor actually have the LEGAL authority to grant someone the RIGHT to consume the schools electricity for non-school related needs????? We are talking about the legal system here, since we are talking arrest. Have you verified this with a lawyer?

      My point after this too long post in response to your too long post is that you should get off your high horse and get some perspective.

      However, I again iterate that, what he did was not right, but the punishment should meet the "crime" so to speak.

    24. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no we don't? Maybe in your fantasy land, but I see examples of disproportionate response every day.

      Where is there fair and just "earth" you are referring to? Where people can't be forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for downloading a song?

    25. Re:Theft by parkinglot777 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read the TFA, you could find some more information even though this does not answer all of your questions but still give you some more perspective to the situation.

      Sgt. Ford says the officer should have arrested Kamooneh on the spot. But he didn't. Instead, the officer filed a police report. Then 11 days passed, and two deputies showed up at his house in Decatur.

      "They arrested me here at about eight o'clock at night," Kamooneh said.

      Ford said he sought the arrest warrant after determining that school officials hadn't given Kamooneh permission to plug in his car. Ford said Chamblee Police did so without asking school officials if they wanted to prosecute the alleged theft of electricity.

    26. Re: Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me that a school's power would be at least partly paid for by me i own.. im not aware that you can steal something you pay for.. further, should it then also be illegal to use power outlets at libraries? Are these not both publicly funded institutions?
      I would equate an open outlet in a public space the same as open wifi. If you dont want to share, dont leave your things out. Just my .02

    27. Re:Theft by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He could be the officer assigned to the school, hence he would have jurisdiction - but as you said we don't know.

      If the EV owner has a child at the school, then he might very well have reasonable belief that he could use the electricity since he's technically paying for it. Hell, with public schools all people in the district are paying for the electric bill.

      This is an issue we'll have to address, since no reasonable person thinks there's anything approaching criminal with someone plugging their phone in while waiting in a reception area. But plugging in the car outside while on school property and presumably with official business at the school is somehow different?

      The only difference here is likely the scale of the draw, since an EV is going to draw significantly more power in total than a phone ever would.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    28. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The difference here being, this is a public school. I am going to assume this man pays property taxes in his county, sales tax on what he purchases in his county and income tax to the state of Georgia. Care to tell me how this is a theft of services? This man pays his fair share of taxes in the state of Georgia, trust me. The worst part is, all of his tax dollars are now going to pay for a criminal suit against him for "theft" on something he has already "paid for via proxy". Oh, and lawyer fees too. Way to fuck the little guy, Chamblee GA...

    29. Re:Theft by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      It has the smell of the car owner not giving the cop the respect he thought he deserved, and the cop then acting within the letter of the law to teach him some respect.

      I can't see any other reason why the cop would have pushed this.

    30. Re:Theft by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Stealing is stealing.

      Legal precedent begs to differ.

      If you steal a nickel's worth of electricity from a school, you get arrested.

      If you're a bank and you steal billions of dollars from taxpayers, you get another couple billion as a reward.

      So no, stealing is not stealing, it's only stealing when you do it. So long as "you" is not a bank, LEO, or multinational conglomerate.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    31. Re:Theft by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Unless he then calls the cops.
      He might have stolen $1 of electricity, but you just destroyed his $10 power cable.

    32. Re:Theft by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      This might be the case -- but did the school call the police because they saw someone plugging into their power outlet, or did the policeman do this "in the public good"? If the second, he has no jurisdiction

      Not necessarily. I don't know about GA, but next door here in SC there are a lot of parking lots have notices that state "This parking lot under the jurisdiction of XYZ Police Department.". Basically that grants the police department jurisdiction over the parking lot even though its privately owned property. If the school does that then the police do have jurisdiction there.

      I actually work for a county so we're directly affiliated with the sheriff's department but even we grant jurisdiction to the town police department rather than having our own patrol vehicles watching the parking lot.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    33. Re: Theft by mordjah · · Score: 2

      Seems to me that a school's power would be at least partly paid for by me i own.. im not aware that you can steal something you pay for.. further, should it then also be illegal to use power outlets at libraries? Are these not both publicly funded institutions? I would equate an open outlet in a public space the same as open wifi. If you dont want to share, dont leave your things out. Just my .02

      --
      "A mind reader? That sounds like sci fi." "Honey, we live on a space ship"
    34. Re:Theft by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Everyone loves electric cars so much that they naturally defend any fellow hippie driving one, when he's stealing electricity from the man (because, hey, electricity should be free, man--you know, like the air and shit). But I wonder how many of you would be so cool if a neighbor bought one and started running an extension cord over to one of your outside outlets to charge it every night? Something tells me that they would take a most uncool attitude then, no matter how much the neighbor assured them that "It's just a few cents--chill out, dude."

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    35. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you familiar with the concept of proportionate response? This man was locked up for 15 hours. Even if he only made minimum wage, he was deprived of $108.75 worth of time. That means the response resulted in a punishment that's 2175x the magnitude of the offense.

      And that's not even counting the amount of money wasted by the police investigating and concluding this case.

    36. Re: Theft by mythosaz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ah yes, the ol,"I pay taxes, therefore I can take anything the government didn't nail down" defense.

    37. Re:Theft by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      It is also designed to be used.

      But designed to be used for what and by who? it might be there for powering Xmas lights, or for outdoor events, or whatever. But it wasn't put there for members of the public, even parents, to use.

      Don't get me wrong, I think this was a cop going over the top. But it was also a car driver taking electricity he knew wasn't intended for him. It's not logically any different from a gas car driver spotting a gas can left outside someone's property, and using it to top up his tank.

      It's just growing pains though. As we move to more general owning of electric cars, these things will have to be worked out. Premises with outdoor electric sockets will have to think about whether they want car owners to top up for free, to set up some paid charging system for them, or to lock the power away.

    38. Re:Theft by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      A better analogy might be if I hooked a hose up to said water fountain and ran it over to my house in lieu of paying for water service.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    39. Re:Theft by esampson · · Score: 1

      No. Laws may be employed to control the populace, but they originated to prevent harm.

      Kind of like how contracts originated so that both parties would fully know and understand their responsibilities and what they were agreeing to (and so third parties would have evidence of what the first two had agreed to). The fact that they are sometimes (or often) employed to trick or trap people doesn't change what the were originally intended to do.

    40. Re: Theft by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      Your suggestions have about as much legal relevance as "finders keepers". i.e. none.

    41. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it have to come down to that? Do we need to have on every electrical outlet a sign warning people not to plug their vehicles in, similar to the signs that are on dumpsters?

      What ever happened to common sense? Do we need a sign asking people not to piss on the floor of a hotel lobby or not punch the bouncer in the face?

      What I would not be surprised is to see electrical outlets with locking cover plates and keyswitches, similar to what is used to protect outside watering, even though most of the time it is just a square-head bolt. Right now, no such animal exists (other than throwing the breaker which is to the outside power), but if people start deciding to leech electricity to their EVs from any socket that is out there, someone will be making such a thing in no time.

      It looks like as people are moving to EVs, they want to "buck the system" thinking they are better than others. However, plugging into a wall and siphoning someone's gas tank are the same exact thing. Someone is gaining material goods, another is losing it.

      In the past there were things called "morals", which is why this wasn't done. Since those are gone, fear of jail is what has to replace it, as well as heavier and heavier security.

    42. Re:Theft by Roogna · · Score: 1

      Besides, nothing in the articles I've seen have shown he stole anything. Neither of the linked articles mention the school at all, short of a comment poster saying the school is not pressing any charges. So all I'm seeing is an article about a cop who presumed the guy was stealing the electricity and didn't have permission. The police are supposed to assume innocence until proven guilty. Where is the statement from the school saying he plugged in without permission? Because apparently they're not pressing charges, which means the owner of the outlet doesn't seem concerned... how can he be charged with theft?

      If I hand someone a loaf of bread on the street that I baked, they shouldn't then be arrested for theft because the cop doesn't think they should have it.

    43. Re: Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a liberal.

    44. Re:Theft by Pope · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised more RV-ers weren't met with a shotgun in the face.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    45. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're full of crap. To plug into a standard outlet you have to have 15A wiring and if you are "fusing things" then there's either an obvious code violation (because you don't have 15 amp wiring, or have more than a 15 amp breaker) or no code at all. And if it's insured then guess what? It better get compliant with some sort of code because the insurance company won't take the excuse of there being no electrical code as an excuse to have shitty wiring if there's a fire.

      You say the maximum is 13 amps and you have thermal issues at even that? It means you have less than 16 gauge wiring... meaning you have 18 gauge wiring. There's no way that complies with any sort of code. Lamp cords, those are the only thing that can have 18 gauge wiring. For anything that provides a 15A outlet receptacle it needs 14 gauge minimum.

    46. Re:Theft by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Laws were invented to prevent harm, not categories of behaviour.

      Where the hell did you get that from? If that were the case, you could defend yourself with a "I likely won't do it again" defense and have your case dismissed. "Oh forget JUSTICE FOR THE CRIME YOU COMMITTED. We just wanted to make sure you weren't going to harm again, son. Case dismissed!"

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    47. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If an ordinary receptacle was installed outside at a public place, funded by taxes, I wouldn't think twice about using it. My taxes paid for the electricity, I have as much right as anyone else to use it. I'm of the opinion that if you don't want the public using shared resources then the onus is on the establishment to not install a common receptacle that anyone can plug something into.

      If the government doesn't want people using the electricity, the burden is on the government to secure its receptacles, it's that simple.

    48. Re:Theft by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      plug their travel trailers into outlets in the nearby house

      Oh, I use that outlet for experiments - that's why I have an ignition coil hooked up to the leads...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    49. Re:Theft by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1
      Don't be silly, if my neighbor needs to use my outlet sometime for an hour, I could care less if he/she tells me.

      At most, they can take 15 cents of power an hour. They would have to be using it all day, every day, before I'd really care. An hour a week? Blah, not worth remotely caring about. Opening my front door costs me more money in lost cold air from the AC than an hour of time on an outlet does. Really, this is much ado about nothing.

    50. Re:Theft by spitzak · · Score: 1

      That is just silly. You mean that because you pay property taxes, you are free to take anything from the school? Besides electricity it has some computers and phones, and space that you can use for office or an extra room to live in. Hey you should be able to use the cafeteria kitchen to make your own meals!

      Even better, you also paid taxes for the military. I guess you can take anything they own, too! A tank would be pretty neat for a weekend. I'm sure the "I paid taxes for this" defense will save me!

    51. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      assuming this is a public school it is already state owned/controlled property so the police don't need any special permission to enter the parking lot.

    52. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Try doing it in someone's house.
      Not the same thing. Do you ask permission before charging a cell phone at the airport?

    53. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you haven't visited Earth in a while...

      Here on Earth, and not whatever idealistic world you're thinking of, there is a thing called "mandatory minimum sentencing." I don't see how locking people away for years simply for growing some plants for personal use is actually a crime, or what victim is damaged...

      Here on Earth, we have various different governments with various different laws. On some parts of Earth, you can be put to death for receiving a blowjob. "Correct response to a problem" indeed...

      Here on Earth, the police are not really supposed to determine the value of things being stolen. If a teenager ran out of the dollar store with a basket full of unpaid items, is the cop supposed to start counting and only give chase if he counts some arbitrary number of items? No, of course not. He makes the arrest and let's the DA sort it out...

    54. Re:Theft by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Okay, fair. Prevent and redress harm.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    55. Re:Theft by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Of course the magnitude of the offence matters.

      "The law does not concern itself with trifles" - usually referred to as 'de minimis' in laws. With most laws, you need to commit an offence of a significant enough seriousness to even be an offence. Once you get past that point, there is also the broad principle of proportionality, i.e. let the punishment fit the crime. Then you factor in intent, state of mind etc.

      Speeding and parking illegally can lead to risk to others, so even relatively 'small' offences can have large consequences, and that's why they're taken somewhat seriously, beyond the actual consequences (which are usually, though not always, pretty much nil). Charging an electric car in a stationary parking spot? Not so much.

      The correct response here was for the officer to inform the school, and then they could decide if they wanted to file a civil suit to get their 5c back. Invoking criminal theft just makes an ass of the police officer and the law.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    56. Re:Theft by fredprado · · Score: 1

      it might be there for powering Xmas lights, or for outdoor events, or whatever. But it wasn't put there for members of the public, even parents, to use.

      In exactly the same way water taps could be there for exclusive use of students, or teachers, or even just as a decoration.

    57. Re:Theft by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Well, the water fountain was designed and installed for free water. And there are outlets in public places for free electricity to top off one’s phone. But I don’t think that was the case here. I see this as more akin to your next door neighbor running an extension line over to your home to borrow a little electricity – and failing to tell you. It might be for only a small amount but it is not good behavior. I think that a stern warning might have been better unless it was a chronic problem.

      Schools aren't public buildings. Meaning the general public is NOT allowed to go wandering and using school facilities. So actually, no, you shouldn't be going into a school that you do not attend, that your kids don't attend and that you have no business being at, just to use a water fountain, electricity, or even the bathroom.

      Granted, if you are caught in a school, using the bathroom or water fountain, at worse you get trespassing charged, not theft.

      I just wonder what the school is teaching the kids here, that theft is theft, no matter what (pro copyright), or that sharing is wrong (pro copyright)?

      Either way, the kids lose out.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    58. Re:Theft by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of the arrests for using open wifi networks. See http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/05/michigan-man-arrested-for-using-cafes-free-wifi-from-his-car/

      The one in Alaska, arresting someone for using a library's wifi after hours, is particularly ridiculous. I've done that many times, librarians have even mentioned people doing it with no hint that it is any kind of problem.

    59. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dare you talk to me of crime, and the price he had to pay.
      Every man is born in sin, every man must choose his way.

      You know nothing of Javert, I was born inside a jail.
      I was born with scum like you, I am from the gutter too!

    60. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I lived on the planet you do where the punishment fits the crime. Over here we lock people up for life just for selling certain plants the government disagrees with.

    61. Re:Theft by sjames · · Score: 1

      If my taxes supported your household budget, I would not see a moral problem with using 5 cents worth of electricity from an outside outlet, thank you very much. Since that is not the case, I would ask first.

      If a visitor to my home used an outside outlet for 5 cents worth of electricity, I wouldn't care. If they asked first, I would certainly allow it. Of course, that's because I was raised to be a civil human being. If a random stranger who was not visiting my house plugged in, I would ask them to leave but I would not call the cops. If the cops showed up anyway, I would decline to press charges or cooperate in any way if the DA wanted to press charges.

    62. Re:Theft by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be grounds for trespassing? You know having people on your property without permission?

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    63. Re:Theft by TechNeilogy · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have relatives who are in law enforcement. I can tell you exactly how they would have handled this: "Move along, buddy, and don't let me catch you doing this again."

      --
      "The wisdom of the Patriarchs was that they *knew* they were fools." --Master Foo
    64. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might have stolen $1 of electricity, but you just destroyed his $10 power cable.

      ...that was trespassing over the property line without permission and drawing power without permission. In Georgia the cops would laugh in his face, cite him for a frivolous call to 911, and ask me if I want to press charges for theft and trespass.

    65. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schools != public property in the sense that where I live, if someone who had no business near a public school was on their property, the local security and police will be intercepting them the second they set food on on the property. No trespassing signs are common.

      With this in mind, the person plugged into the outlet might already be committing a criminal act (defiant trespass) without even pulling out their extension cord and getting a freebie fill-up courtesy the local taxpayers. With security so high on school grounds and a suspicious person wired in, it definitely will get attention... unwanted attention.

      Must be nice. Wish my local elementary school had a diesel gas tank usable for free for my TDI.

    66. Re:Theft by mlts · · Score: 1

      Without a sign, they have to be officially given a notice of trespass or warned off by the police. Shouting, "git off my lawn" won't do the job unless there is legal proof this was done.

    67. Re:Theft by mi · · Score: 1

      If you're a bank and you steal billions of dollars from taxpayers

      Citation needed.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    68. Re:Theft by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 2

      The law (as in common law) has been created and refined by courts over millennia to compensate for and (indirectly) prevent harm. Legislatures twist the law and abuse the respect people hold for it to control the populace.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    69. Re:Theft by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      The minor differences:

      • Private property vs public property
      • The property owner called the police
    70. Re:Theft by ffflala · · Score: 1

      There is a fair question of ownership here. This was a public school, not a private random stranger's house. Public schools are supported by taxes. The guy arrested was local, and has certainly paid more than a nickel in taxes to support the school. Some of his taxes might have gone to pay the school's electric bill.

      Shouldn't the public be able to make use of something they have paid for?

    71. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sucks to be you when you are arrested and body cavity searched because you drove 56 in a 55 mph zone on your way home from work. But, you were BREAKING the LAW. The anal rape you got from your cell mate just goes with the territory. Can't be bothered to feel bad for you-- you stinking criminal.

    72. Re:Theft by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Really? You never heard about TARP?

      Google "TARP"

      Also Google "The Great American Bubble Machine" by Matt Taibbi. Great article by one of the few real journalists left in 'Murica.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    73. Re:Theft by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      In for a penny in for a pound, scale has no bearing, the acts are in and of themselves the same. If they wouldn't think twice about letting someone recharge a phone while on school grounds, why is the vehicle charging an issue.

      Assuming of course the phone owner just plugs in without asking permission to do so.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    74. Re:Theft by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Laws prevent nothing.

      There is a law against driving while intoxicated but that law doesn't prevent an intoxicated person from getting behind the wheel and driving.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    75. Re:Theft by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If an ordinary receptacle was installed outside at a public place, funded by taxes, I wouldn't think twice about using it.

      I would. I have played gigs at schools and needed to plug in my amp. Instead of just plugging in, I always ask "Is it okay to plug in here?" And this is when I am invited. It is what used to be know as "Common Courtesy" and is now unfortunately known as "Exemplary Courtesy".

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    76. Re:Theft by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Especially in Texas.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    77. Re:Theft by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "I was raised to be a civil human being."

      Police departments refuse to hire people with such an affliction anymore.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    78. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not only about damage done, but also about potential damage. if I swing a baseball bat at your head, and just happen to miss, I still get charged with assault. No damage done does not mean it's not a crime.

    79. Re:Theft by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I can just hangout on some random guy's lawn without consequence, unless he has a trespass sign?

      I'm willing to be the laws regarding trespassing vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. However, it just seems wrong, so it should be illegal. If it isn't then laws should be passed to make it so.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    80. Re:Theft by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      Please read properly and use common sense.

      I said "Publicly accessible property" not PUBLIC property.

      Schools are not all made the same, they dont have barb wire and gates with security walls, or 8 foot high brick walls surrounding every inch of them.
      And even if they did, they are accessible to a good portion of the public (parents and children), children or others going to an evening course or extra curricular activity after hours.

      They guy was there for his child's soccer game (thus he was there legally) so you can stop your criminal act for defiant trespass idiotic nonsense.

      As I also said, he definitely should be warned, maybe even ticketed. But 15 hours of jail (SO FAR) plus court costs and proceedings with possibly more jail, is like death penalty for speeding.

    81. Re:Theft by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the issue at first is the 5 cents of power. It's the danger that might have been caused by him plugging in something in a circuit he knows nothing about without asking first. It could have caused damage to school equipment or caused an electrical fire. He could have damaged his car and tried to sue. For me the amount of power he took isn't really any concern, it's the risk he might have caused.

      I don't however, agree that putting him in jail overnight was reasonable. This should have been handled by a simple fine.

    82. Re:Theft by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Really! If they don't want people using it after hours, turn it the f*** off. Turn the power down so you cannot see it a mile away. Almost every AP I've seen has radio control settings. And those that don't can be plugged into a X10 timer.

    83. Re:Theft by bdo19 · · Score: 1

      No, a better analogy might be if you used the water fountain to fill your water bottle.

    84. Re:Theft by u38cg · · Score: 1

      This stuff happens. I used to work in a food distribution company that was located in a subdivided warehouse. We ran half a dozen industrial walk-in fridge units, so no-one ever noticed it was a little higher than it should have been, since the joiner next door had been getting free electricity ever since the subdivision.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    85. Re:Theft by mi · · Score: 1

      Really? You never heard about TARP?

      TARP was about government bailing out financial institutions. Whether ill-advised or not, there is nothing in there about the said institutions stealing billions of dollars.

      Request for citation stands...

      Also Google ...

      No, dear, that's not how it works. You make a statement, you provide evidence. And if you wish to refer to some unknown writer instead of supplying arguments yourself, you have to establish their credentials too.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    86. Re:Theft by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      They should have welcomed the new addition of the RV to their homestead and offered to rent it out to the new tenants for $100 per night, then charged them with grand theft auto when they disappeared with it the next day.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    87. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are a fine asshole, your lot don't think, have no ability to think, just believe that zero-tolerance is THE thing. What is law for laws', cops' and lawyers' and feel good assholes like yours' sake?

      "Its only few cents" does matter in a world where people of sanity live.

    88. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this guy hadn't been caught, how much juice would he have stolen? On how many days per week? What if it became common practice and hundreds of people were doing it all the time?

    89. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in schools and I can't leave trailing leads on the ground, I have to be careful not to overload circuits that are sometimes not even capable of providing the local 13A maximum without fusing things (but yet checked regularly and are legal). And he plugged it in and walked off, so there's no telling what might have happened - electrical fire, overloaded the circuit and cut off the alarm or some other important system, etc. and it's possible nobody would have known until he returned to his car.

      This bullshit of endless what if's and offloading of responsibility for the failures of others is a boundless source of amusement.

      In no sane country does code allow for wiring smaller than fuse protecting it. If you know electrical outlets are unsafe and don't do shit about it what does that say about you?

      This is common sense. Your failure to do anything about unsafe condition is much worse an offense than plugging into someone elses socket without asking first. If someone needs to be hauled off to jail you would be my first choice.

    90. Re:Theft by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      In your opinion, had he asked, he would have been allowed to do this. However, in your opinion, since he did not ask, he should be arrested?

      Do you not see the hypocrisy?

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    91. Re:Theft by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the public be able to make use of something they have paid for?

      Didn't work when I wanted a go in an MRI machine*.

      *NHS.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    92. Re:Theft by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Laws were invented to prevent harm, not categories of behaviour.

      Why is attempted murder a crime then?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    93. Re:Theft by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      And all of your stuff is right behind your locked door that's easily picked. That means you want other people to take your stuff since you don't live inside a vault. But even then, some highly-skilled people would still be allowed to take your stuff. Unless, of course, you actually DON'T WANT THEM TO. Then taking your stuff is illegal.

    94. Re:Theft by slew · · Score: 1

      "If you owe the bank $100 that's your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem." - J. Paul Getty
      Of course the only difference is that most of "us" are not too big to fail...

    95. Re:Theft by ishamael69 · · Score: 1

      If you had already been told not to be on the property where the water fountain was located (like this guy had), then I'm okay with you being ticketed or arrested.

    96. Re:Theft by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      , they should have issued a warning since that may have all that is needed

      Considering the guy ignored earlier requests to stop charging his car there, I doubt one more warning would have done anything. This isn't some guy getting hit by surprise. They asked him to stop. He kept doing it. They called the cops on his ass.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    97. Re:Theft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It was a misdemeanor, and the person was not arrested at the time, but only after further investigation with the school. And maybe they were out of murderers and rapists at the time. The police responded because there was a 911 call about the car; maybe some nosy neighbor, maybe some school employee, the story doesn't say. And the car owner had been warned by the school to not use the tennis courts which is indeed where he was located.

    98. Re:Theft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      No, it was a tennis game with his son. And he had been told by the school to stop using the tennis courts in the past without permission, and yet he was using those courts anyway.

      There won't be more jail time, it's just a misdemeanor charge.

    99. Re:Theft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The story does say that he was told in the past he did not have permission to use the tennis courts at the school. So not really trespassing per se, but he also certainly did not have permission to be there. While the school did not ask police to prosecute, I doubt they went out of their way to defend him either. The first linked article has this information in it if you read to the end and the police statement which is included.

      The cop showed up because their was a 911 call on the incident, which pretty much means someone has to come over and investigate.

    100. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quite an idiot. There's reasonable expectation of utility use at a public property when you have a legitimate reason to be there.

    101. Re:Theft by tftp · · Score: 1

      I don't however, agree that putting him in jail overnight was reasonable. This should have been handled by a simple fine.

      A night in jail is free, and it carries a much better lesson. A fine leaves a permanent mark on your wallet, and it does not serve as an educational tool.

    102. Re:Theft by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      As a general rule, to prevent further attempts. That counts as preventing harm!

      (Although note my other post, which expands the definition to include redressal as well.)

      There was a story a few years ago of an elderly lady with dementia who strangled another nursing home resident. Despite being an actual murder, it wasn't clear whether or not she'd actually be sentenced to any punishments.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    103. Re:Theft by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and then wash my hands in the sink, and maybe stop at the drinking fountain. Hey, look at me stealing water! That costs money, you know!

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    104. Re:Theft by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Everyone loves electric cars so much that they naturally defend any fellow hippie driving one, when he's stealing electricity from the man (because, hey, electricity should be free, man--you know, like the air and shit).

      I haven't seen a single indication that that's the attitude people here have.

    105. Re:Theft by FloydTheDroid · · Score: 1

      Schools are not public property. It used to be that they would just tell you to get lost (as happened to me walking through an elementary playground on my way to college) but now, after Sandy Hook, they'll probably just shoot you.

    106. Re:Theft by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Here in NZ we had a phone company do it. They didn't like the attitude a guy gave them calling the customer service number, so they tacked a miscellaneous "Penalty for being an arrogant bastard".

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    107. Re:Theft by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If you wouldn't have done it at a random stranger's house, why would you do it at your children's school without asking?

      The same reason I'd take a piss in the school restroom without asking, but not in yours.

      Because you're too short to use a regular height urinal?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    108. Re:Theft by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      Either way, he now has an arrest record for the rest of his life.

    109. Re:Theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If the EV owner has a child at the school, then he might very well have reasonable belief that he could use the electricity since he's technically paying for it.

      EVERYONE pays for schools, not just parents. Thats why we can afford to send our kids to school because society as a whole pays for the service. So no, this jackass had no more right to steal electricity from the school than I do have the right to steal food from the cafeteria or footballs from the gym.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    110. Re:Theft by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      If public schools are not owned by the public, who owns them?

    111. Re:Theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You guys and your jurisdiction ignorance.

      Cops generally can go after crime regardless of what jurisdiction it is in. Contrary to the silly movies you think are real, there is none of this shit about not being able to cross state lines, counties or cities. They in fact do it rather regularly between GA and SC.

      They may have a more difficult time handling the case if questions arise, but you're an idiot if you think a cop needs permission to do something in some parking lot in the town he's employed by. It doesn't work that way.

      Any cop in GA can operate ANYWHERE in GA. An atlanta cop can drag your ass to jail in columbus if he wants to.

      You really need to lay off the ignorance and tv.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    112. Re:Theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Notice that in this case the school did not press charges, implying that the school didn't mind the use, or at least judged it to be harmless enough.

      ... So, you didn't read any of the actual article at all did you ... you know ... the part where the cop ASKED THE SCHOOL IF THEY WANTED TO DO ANYTHING AND ONLY AFTER THAT DID THEY ARREST THIS JACKASS?

      But hey, don't let facts get in the way.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    113. Re:Theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      God, how much of a douche are you trying to turn this into a fucking GPL issue?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    114. Re:Theft by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no. you don't get to fly air force one, you don't get to take office supplies from a desk at city hall, you don't get to take light bulbs from the city college restroom to use in your home.

    115. Re:Theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, not seriously, this guy doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    116. Re:Theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Schools may be government owned, but there is nothing public about them, sorry, try again.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    117. Re:Theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Google get a clue.

      TARP existed because the government changed a series of laws that took perfectly legitimate banks and suddenly made them illegal because the law changed what banks had to hold in reserve (and a bunch of other shit, I'm highly over simplifying since you clearly have no idea). The result is that a law change suddenly made banks way over drawn and operating illegally.

      TARP existed because the government fucked up and TARP was a shitty shot at fixing the problems they created themselves.

      Had banking laws not changed the year before, TARP would not have been needed.

      The banks were never in danger of going out of business or defaulting on their debts, the numbers on paper simply no longer met the requirements they had been meeting for the last 100 years.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm GLAD we changed the banking laws, but you're a moron for having no clue as to what actually happened in the financial world yet still spewing on like you know it all.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    118. Re:Theft by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      neighboor guy at four unit townhome I used to rent plugged his tools in my patio's outlet and tripped the breaker which also strangley supplied half my living room. I wasn't nice and neighborly about anyone using that outlet after that.

    119. Re:Theft by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1
      Did you even read the very next sentence?

      Hell, with public schools all people in the district are paying for the electric bill.

      It still goes that him being at the school for a reason (presumably other than to plug in his car) is very much akin to people plugging in their phones while at the school for reasons other than charging their phone.

      Taking of physical things is obviously bad, but explain why society tacitly allows the 'stealing' of electricity by people plugging in their phones? Why is the car 'different' than the phone?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    120. Re:Theft by ffflala · · Score: 1

      I get to take a piss in city hall, though. And if I'm waiting for my SO to take a piss, I can grab a drink of water. These things are as open as this outlet. The school could have easily blocked it with a simple lock to make the "don't plug in here!" absolutely clear. They could have even wrapped a goddamn paperclip around a flimsy hinge and I bet this dude would not have plugged in for it.

    121. Re:Theft by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Despite being an actual murder, it wasn't clear whether or not she'd actually be sentenced to any punishments.

      Because she wasn't likely to harm anyone else? Or because she may have been deemed not to be responsible for her actions?

      Despite being an actual murder

      Sounds like that might be open to interpretation too:

      Murder is the unlawful killing, with malice aforethought, of another human

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    122. Re:Theft by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1
      If your neighbor has any brains, he can fix that with a 6 pack of beer (or your preferred beverage).

      The gesture goes a long way to making it all ok. If someone needed to use my outlets all weekend for something, a 12 pack of beer would be totally awesome!

      Really, these are first world problems being talked about here...

    123. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This Earth you speak of seems like a nice place. Where can I find it?

      captcha: gravity

    124. Re:Theft by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      De minimis non curat lex. Laws were invented to prevent harm, not categories of behaviour.

      Hence the war on hippies smoking herbs?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    125. Re:Theft by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I'm not much of a cop movie fan anyways, but if anything movies show police as having too broad of powers compared to real life.

      They may have a more difficult time handling the case if questions arise, but you're an idiot if you think a cop needs permission to do something in some parking lot in the town he's employed by. It doesn't work that way.

      Sorry, but there are actual laws, and they do matter. Law enforcement has specific bounds that they have to work within. Specifically to South Carolina, the law is 23-1-15. Without that police can look into a criminal case but they cannot enforce any traffic laws within the area.

      Any real property which is used as a parking lot and is open to use by the public for motor vehicle traffic shall be within the police jurisdiction with regard to the unlawful operation of motor vehicles in such parking lot.

      Such parking lots shall be posted with appropriate signs to inform the public that the area is subject to police jurisdiction with regard to unlawful operation of motor vehicles. The extension of police jurisdiction to such areas shall not be effective until the signs are posted.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    126. Re:Theft by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Google get a clue.

      Ooh, a personal attack, right out of the gate.

      Well, that pretty much guarantees that the rest of your post isn't worth reading, now doesn't it?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    127. Re:Theft by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1
    128. Re:Theft by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      It's very important legislation that protects the snack food industry from over-expansion.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    129. Re:Theft by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      At the time the story was fresh, it seemed likely that even if she were deemed competent, the punishment wouldn't be all that severe, very much because she wasn't likely to harm anyone else, yes. (As long as she doesn't have another roommate, anyway.)

      I believe the (healthy) rationale behind the prosecution of cases where another attempt is unlikely or impossible (say the target died) is that the perpetrator has been shown to be unbalanced enough to attempt to redress one problem with murder and could potentially try to solve other problems the same way.

      That being said, there aren't too many criminal justice systems that completely extricate themselves from being vengeful instruments of state violence.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    130. Re:Theft by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Apparently you didn't read the article, either, as in the part it says the school didn't press charges. What the cop said is most likely a lie to save face.

    131. Re:Theft by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      not first world problem at all, someone tries that stunt in SE asian country where electricity is very expensive they just might get killed

    132. Re:Theft by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1
      Well, SE Asia isn't 1st world, now is it?

      In the US and Europe, it is indeed a 1st world problem.

    133. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had been asked to not use the school tennis courts because of an altercation previously. He not only used the tennis court, he plugged into an outlet. The amount of electricity stolen probably would power the car for 3 minutes. They called the police because he had already been told NO. This theft charge is their reaction to a guy who has a record of being a douche.

    134. Re:Theft by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you miss point, stealing neighbor's electricity not confined to first world at all. not a 'first world problem" as the third world also has electricity

    135. Re:Theft by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      And you missed my point... complaining about the theft is the "1st world" part... yes, in other parts of the world where power is expensive and people are poor, it is more of an issue, but to affluent people, this is much ado about nothing.

    136. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it be up to the school officials to prosecute when it was officer Ford who originally witnessed the crime? That's like saying if the guy were caught breaking windows on the school property and officer Ford witnessed it but the school officials did not want to prosecute...a crime was still committed in the eyes of the law. This is really a bad article though in the first place, because it should actually be titled "guy was arrested for stealing a nickles worth of power because he was a belligerent asshole." (Won't even mention the fact that the school had already told him he wasn't allowed on school property, and his son did not belong to that school.)

    137. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason I'd take a piss in the school restroom without asking, but not in yours.

      Just remember to use the sink so there's no bill for the flush.

    138. Re: Theft by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has a battery-powered vacuum cleaner. Are you arguing that designing a building for proper custodial care is akin to setting up a free electricity booth? Public funding is for everyone to get benefit. When you take things that aren't meant for you, you're not using just the share you paid for - you're using part of someone else's share too.

    139. Re:Theft by omnichad · · Score: 1

      These interpretations of the law are getting silly. True, open/unsecured networks doesn't necessarily mean free. But if a business advertises free wifi, then it's free unconditionally. If they had signs up that say free wifi for customers, then that's different.

    140. Re:Theft by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If it was sitting on my lawn, then it's abandoned property in my eyes.

    141. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the EV owner has a child at the school, then he might very well have reasonable belief that he could use the electricity since he's technically paying for it. Hell, with public schools all people in the district are paying for the electric bill.

      I, as a taxpayer, pay for the military's tanks. That doesn't mean I have the right to go onto an Army base and take one for a joyride.

    142. Re:Theft by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Counter point. I pay taxes and am perfectly legally allowed to drink water from a publicly placed fountain. The outlet was publicly accessible.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  8. WRONG UNITS IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should have read 1Kwatt hour / hour.

    Unless it really is steadily increasing it's draw by 1Kwatt every hour.
    Unless after 12 hours, it's draws 12Kwatt.

    1. Re:WRONG UNITS IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I was worried this had been missed on this nerd site.

  9. Good by lambent · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm getting pretty tired of seeing extension cords snaking through parking lots and parking garages.

    I don't think the issue here is just five cents; some places can't handle the capacity this puts on their systems or wiring, or perhaps they don't want the liability of you screwing up your car thanks to faulty wiring, and suing you for it. And hell, what if some bright person uses a cord that's too light of a gauge for the current, and ends up starting a fire or hurting someone?

    Charging should be done where appropriate, not wherever anyone wants.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the whole grid will be taxed beyond capacity if they do not generate more, which is impossible with the greens block all new power construction.

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      God forbid you deny anything to the "oppressed" or the self-entitled. I expect you'll be flamed and modded down here since /. is full of communists.

    3. Re:Good by number17 · · Score: 1

      I'm getting pretty tired of seeing extension cords snaking through parking lots and parking garages.

      I wondered how I would power an electric in my underground (no outlets) and have yet to see the extension cord snaking where I live. I assumed that the parking lot/garage would just forbid it by unplugging or cutting those extensions.

    4. Re:Good by war4peace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the discussion is not around whether the activity would be legal or appropriate. It's more around whether the arrest is really the proper way to handle that infraction. It's akin to beheading someone for swearing in public.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:Good by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Not insightful.
      Nor factual.
      Possibly sarcastic...but I doubt it.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    6. Re:Good by tgd · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm getting pretty tired of seeing extension cords snaking through parking lots and parking garages.

      I don't think the issue here is just five cents; some places can't handle the capacity this puts on their systems or wiring, or perhaps they don't want the liability of you screwing up your car thanks to faulty wiring, and suing you for it. And hell, what if some bright person uses a cord that's too light of a gauge for the current, and ends up starting a fire or hurting someone?

      Charging should be done where appropriate, not wherever anyone wants.

      Saying this as an owner of a car that gets plugged in, I totally agree. Stealing power is stealing power. Common sense says if you aren't paying the bill on that outlet, you ask whoever is paying for it before you plug in, you don't assume its okay.

      That's good for a couple of reasons. It avoids situations like this (and this isn't, by any means, the first time its happened), and it also gets the discussion about charging going... lots of places will tell you no problem. Places that don't may or may not have legitimate concerns about it. Considering how many times I've popped breakers with my charging cable, its entirely reasonable for places to say no. This isn't plugging in a cell phone charger, its plugging in a device that nearly maxes out a typical residential circuit.

      The thing that is stupid about this article isn't that the police considered it theft (it absolutely, unequivocally is), but rather that the police arrested someone for the theft of something worth so little. I could *almost* see a justification if the guy was arrested on the spot because the officer didn't know the electricity was worth so little, but after a few days of "investigation", it should've been obvious that the amount falls well below the lower limit of what people are arrested for where theft is concerned.

      IMO, the guy who plugged is car in is the jackass in this -- its because of people like him that people who actually *ask* run into problems.

    7. Re:Good by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm getting pretty tired of seeing extension cords snaking through parking lots and parking garages.

      Why? How does it hurt you?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually arrested and put in jail for about 15 hours for swearing in public in South Carolina. then had to pay 230 bucks in fines/fees after the judge told me "shame on you!"

    9. Re:Good by tgd · · Score: 1

      I'm getting pretty tired of seeing extension cords snaking through parking lots and parking garages.

      I wondered how I would power an electric in my underground (no outlets) and have yet to see the extension cord snaking where I live. I assumed that the parking lot/garage would just forbid it by unplugging or cutting those extensions.

      In most cases, you wouldn't power an electric. The costs aren't insignificant -- it can easily be $50-$60 a month in electricity if you drive a lot. Most landlords won't absorb that themselves, and it'd be pretty surprising if they (or the power company) would run a separate meter for it.

      I mostly just charge my car at home, and I have power there, but I know a few folks who had luck with apartment managers and/or work building managers agreeing to a flat $50 a month or $100/month fee to charge, once they were educated on what it represented. I have a long commute -- if there was power available in the lot at work, I'd absolutely be willing to pony up $30-$50 a month to charge at work. (It'd save me about $100 of gas, and probably cost them $8/wk in electricity.)

    10. Re:Good by fermion · · Score: 1
      In principle I agree, though I have never seen extension cords snaking though parking lots.

      However, the value of the theft is an issue. Unless the school is having problems with people stealing electricity, and has a policy of arresting everyone that is doing it, such an act should really just encompass a summons to court where some fine will be levied. I suspect that the school does not have such a problem and is not arresting everyone, as the arrest occurred days later at the guys house, not at the school. It does not take more than 5 minutes to check with the staff to see if the guy had permission.

      So what we have here are police who have wasted huge amounts of money and resources to harass a guy who really not justify the public expense. It is like the case where the police arrested two men who were chaperoning a girl to a dance class, had notarized authorization from her parents, but still wanted to waste booking time and the expense of keeping the girl in protective services even when the parents said they had authorized the trip. Sure, both cases may be extreme caution, but how much extreme caution can we afford?

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:Good by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I'm getting pretty tired of seeing extension cords snaking through parking lots and parking garages.

      Huh? What exactly is "tiring" you? How does a sight even tire one? If they are YOUR lots and parking garages then fair enough, that would be annoying. But if they aren't, what the fuck have those cables and whatever arrangements they have or do not have have to do with you?

      Mind you own fucking business.

      Not that I'm excusing this guy taking the schools electricity or anyone else taking electricity. But what the fuck has it to do with you? To the extent that it "tires" you?

    12. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some places can't handle the capacity this puts on their systems or wiring

      Maybe they should worry about bringing their wiring up to code before it causes any other problems regardless.

      Where I work, the top floor of the parking garage has a row of charging outlets for EVs, with a roof of solar panels over them. It's rare that anyone uses them, though.

    13. Re:Good by firex726 · · Score: 1

      > some places can't handle the capacity this puts on their systems or wiring

      It works out to about 8 Amps, any circuit in the country should handle that and if they cannot they are not up to code and actions should be taken against the builders/installers.

    14. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I don't understand your point. Could you give me a car analogy?

    15. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get away with a pretty light cord at 8.3A, even over long distances.

    16. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really seem to be getting tired of people not minding their own business. I mean, his post didn't cause you any harm so I wonder what else the poster must have done to anger you so. "Mind your own fucking business"? really, his comment was so harmful you felt compelled to reply in such a way.

      Perhaps you should consider minding your business as well.

    17. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some places can't handle the capacity this puts on their systems or wiring

      Maybe they should worry about bringing their wiring up to code before it causes any other problems regardless.

      Where I work, the top floor of the parking garage has a row of charging outlets for EVs, with a roof of solar panels over them. It's rare that anyone uses them, though.

      You naturally assume they are out of compliance?

    18. Re:Good by mi · · Score: 1

      Unless the school is having problems with people stealing electricity, and has a policy of arresting

      A school can not arrest anyone — not for theft, not for jaywalking, not for rape nor murder.

      Further, theft is a criminal offense and the desires of the (alleged) victim do not decide, whether or not the prosecution is commenced. Sure, the prosecution may take the victim's wishes under advisement and they would look silly in court if the supposed victim testifies for the accused, but the final decision rests with the police/prosecutor.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    19. Re:Good by khb · · Score: 1

      *sigh*. years ago I had a Sparrow (3 wheeled freeway legal EV). It charged exclusively on 110-120v. Most of the time I couldn't *find* anyone who had a clue as to who would have authority to permit plugging in. So I'd ask when practical, didn't when not. Kept the cord short. Engaged anyone who asked in an appropriate discussion about the pros and cons of EVs and the electricity usage. Offered to pay if they appeared to be connected in any meaningful way to the outlet.

      With the exception of my place of employment (Sun Microsystems, RIP) the total usage was pennies or less. I once paid $5 to make a point. Sun not only permitted it, but provided formal EV stations (long before it was popular).

      Since the guy was there to watch his kid play, it seems to me that the appropriate action (if any) by the cop would be a citation. The school board should put the issue on their docket, adopt a policy and post it. either to sell permits, give it away, or prohibit it. But leaving an unlocked, unmarked outlet near where cars park is an "attractive nuisance" if you mean to prosecute anyone who dares use it.

      As many others pointed out, unlike a place of business, the school is publicly funded ... so the public has some rights regarding access to fields, water fountains, etc. unless otherwise marked.

    20. Re:Good by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Komrade AC, vee kno who you arrrrr.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    21. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an eyesore, it's a trip hazard, it's a sign of dis-respect.

    22. Re:Good by danomac · · Score: 1

      Never tripped over a cord, I presume? There are hazards to have cords running all over the place.

    23. Re:Good by bdo19 · · Score: 1

      I'm getting pretty tired of seeing extension cords snaking through parking lots and parking garages.

      I agree to an extent. You could argue that it's a bit tacky. But do you really think that putting this guy in jail for a night is the appropriate level of response by the police?

    24. Re:Good by Lordpidey · · Score: 1

      A damaged extension cord in the rain is an electric hazard.

      You know where such cords are likely to be run over? Parking lots.

      --
      Some people encrypt by using rot-13 twice. I prefer the more secure method of using rot-1 a total of twenty six times.
    25. Re:Good by tftp · · Score: 1

      Huh? What exactly is "tiring" you?

      How many orange cords from Home Depot do you know that are guaranteed to survive repeated pressure from tires of loaded trucks of any legal weight? How many such cords are guaranteed to not get caught by passing vehicles?

      If a cord is shorted or torn, a fire is quite possible. The breaker only protects the circuit - it does not protect the load. As long as the current through the load is under the breaker's limit, your fire will be arcing happily, under parked cars and in dry grass. A single spark may be sufficient in summer.

      This is why electricians route high current wires in steel conduits. They protect the wire, and they ensure that there is nothing flammable in direct contact with the flame or the arc. You cannot just throw a cable on the ground and forget about it.

    26. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any extension cord is a potential tripping hazard. Boom, instant negligence if you don't exercise due care and caution in placing the cord where it presents the least hazard and posting appropriate warning signs.
      You're talking about America right? Extension cords no doubt have already been the subject of a lawsuit before and will be again in the future.

    27. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck yeah it is! (Oh shit!)

    28. Re:Good by tgd · · Score: 1

      As many others pointed out, unlike a place of business, the school is publicly funded ... so the public has some rights regarding access to fields, water fountains, etc. unless otherwise marked.

      The public actually has no access to any of that unless otherwise noted. Even being on those fields outside a permitted school activity is trespassing.

      I'm not sure why people seem to think public funding has anything to do with rights of use. The DoD is publicly funded, but I can't hop in an F16, or go for a walk on a secured base. I can't walk into an elementary school and plop on down on a couch to use their Internet. I can't go use the police shooting range because I don't feel like paying at a public one. Hell, even in something explicitly public -- I can't go and set up a tent and have a party in a public park.

    29. Re:Good by lambent · · Score: 1

      No, not really. It is a bit overreaching.

    30. Re:Good by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Loaded trucks in a parking garage? Overstating much?

      The complaint from the other user was seeing such extensions, not the danger of driving over them. It's quite a leap to imagine that someone is trailing an extension across an access road, such that other cars are driving over it.

      Of course, in the unlikely event that someone is doing that, the correct response is to deal with it there and then. Not just see it, and clock it up mentally as something you are tired of.

  10. Racial profiling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The officer needs repremanded in any case.

    1. Re:Racial profiling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because that's going to happen...

    2. Re:Racial profiling. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Racial profiling? Where does it even say what color anyone was?
      Are we really letting our society get so stupid that any white person who does something to a non-white person is guilty of being a racist? Are we going to have to call the black police to arrest black people, Mexican police to arrest Mexicans? What do we do if a white guy, a black guy and a Mexican guy committed a crime? Then let's even confuse it further. What if one of them was a woman?
      Are we going to have to go back to separate white's and colored's facilities to avoid all the cries of racism? It seems like all of this wonderful racial accusation just incites racism, not subdues it.
      How can we ignore the color of someone's skin when we are accused of racism if we apply the rules equally to everyone and one of those people's skin had a different color?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  11. Before we get a OMG about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets put this all in prespective, he knew what he was doing. I'm sure he's done it before and not been caught. He was trying to fill up the tank of his car for free. He just happened to run into a dumb ass cop that really didn't handle it right at all. But anyone who says this isnt theft isn't putting two and two together.

    1. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      It is theft, but the damages involved are inconsequential. A formal warning by the officer to not do it again would have been a better solution.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      So, you're okay with SPAM because the stealing of services is inconsequential?

      The problem isn't the one guy, it is the one guy, times a factor of a couple thousand others, each getting their own free $.05 charge. Pretty soon you're talking thousands of dollars. Stealing is wrong, because it takes from others that which is neither earned or deserved. The amount doesn't matter on one case, but when you excuse the one case, and it becomes common, then you have to "pass a law" to stop it further.

      It is much easier to stop it now, before it becomes a legal nightmare.

      And why are we praising someone who is being a cheap asshat, simply because it is $.05 worth? Next time, they should simply cut his power cord (unplug it first), and tell him to stop stealing.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Are the only damages (or potential damages) the $0.05 in electricity?
      What if that particular circuit was being used for other things, like running a pump to deal with some flooding, and plugging in the car was enough to blow the braker?

    4. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Are the only damages (or potential damages) the $0.05 in electricity?
      What if that particular circuit was being used for other things, like running a pump to deal with some flooding, and plugging in the car was enough to blow the braker?

      So the next time you run a red light should we lock you up for killing the children that could have been crossing the street at that intersection?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    5. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      What if, what if, what if... The problem with "what if" is that it didn't happen, except in your head.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Nos. · · Score: 1

      No but you don't issue him a warning either... simply because there are much more potentially serious consequences to the action.

    7. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Are the only damages (or potential damages) the $0.05 in electricity?
      What if that particular circuit was being used for other things, like running a pump to deal with some flooding, and plugging in the car was enough to blow the braker?

      So the next time you run a red light should we lock you up for killing the children that could have been crossing the street at that intersection?

      I'm OK with that; IMO running a red light is criminal negligence.

      Counter-argument: Would you say a person that discharges a firearm in a crowded place should not be punished?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by zlives · · Score: 1

      hey can i take 10 cents of gas out of your car per hour

    9. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're okay with SPAM because the stealing of services is inconsequential?

      So if you typo and send someone an email, you should be found guilty of a felony under the CFAA? Guilty is guilty after all.

      He's guilty of, at worst, trespassing in a reasonable person's view. That's a warning and a notice, no fine the first time. But since it's his kids school, that doesn't even apply. If the school had a problem with it, they could have unplugged it/told him not too/secured the outlet if it is a real problem.

    10. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by sjames · · Score: 1

      For the guy in TFA to rise to the level of spammer, he would have needed to plug in to a million outlets all over the city at the same time AND not stop when told not to do it anymore.

    11. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Me running a red light costs $0.00 if it causes no accidents. Why would I still be issued a fine? Infact it probably saves $0.05, since less oil will be burnt accelerating my car again, my brake pads will last longer. Both of those things reduce carbon emissions blah blah less oil wasted blah blah national debt importing more etc.

    12. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mistakenly sending an email to the wrong address is not SPAM. So his point stands.

      Walk up to a stranger and try to take a nickle out of his pocket. Do it a dozen times and let us know how often you get away with it. Yeah the amount is too small to worry about but it still means you're a jackass.

    13. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

      Are the only damages (or potential damages) the $0.05 in electricity?
      What if that particular circuit was being used for other things, like running a pump to deal with some flooding, and plugging in the car was enough to blow the braker?

      So the next time you run a red light should we lock you up for killing the children that could have been crossing the street at that intersection?

      No, you would get a ticket. And the jackass that willfully plugged his car into the outlet without permission should have gotten a ticket.

      --
      Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
    14. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1
    15. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by mi · · Score: 1

      Would you say a person that discharges a firearm in a crowded place should not be punished?

      Only if he meant to hit someone — without a legal reason to do that.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      An informal warning of, "dude that is not right, stop that and don't let me catch you doing that again." Is all that is needed to be done, it's the honest response.. Instead the cops decided to be the scumbags and take the nuclear option.

      Which reinforces the image that cops should never ever be trusted as they will not be reasonable or honest.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Would you say a person that discharges a firearm in a crowded place should not be punished?

      Only if he meant to hit someone — without a legal reason to do that.

      Ah, so if the guy standing next to you in line shoots a gun at the ground, and the round ricochets and hits you in the femoral artery, you don't think he should be charged with a crime, since he didn't mean to kill you.

      You realize that's insane, don't you? Or are you one of those people who flat out refuses to take responsibility for their own actions?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    18. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by mi · · Score: 1

      Ah, so if the guy standing next to you in line shoots a gun at the ground, and the round ricochets and hits you in the femoral artery, you don't think he should be charged with a crime, since he didn't mean to kill you.

      As a matter of fact, no, I do not think, he should be charged over my death. I know, he would be, but in my not-so-humble opinion, he should not be — only with the unlawful discharging of the firearm, because that was what he intended to do and the punishment should not depend on whether the bullet ricocheted into anyone or missed.

      Likewise, there should be no difference between attempted and regular murder (or other crime) — the punishment for murderous intent should be the same regardless of the success. The victim dying (or surviving) later in the hospital should not affect the punishment of the perpetrator.

      I firmly believe, it would be beneficial for the society, if the criminal system prosecuted the intents instead of results. It is most unfortunate, that we can not (with today's technology) reliably know the intent in all cases...

      Or are you one of those ...

      Come, come, let's not devolve into ad hominems this early in the conversation...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    19. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So running a red light is perfectly OK because you haven't killed anyone?

    20. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Look, I get the importance of intent in law.

      But that doesn't change the fact that a person can act negligently, without intent, and still deserve to be punished.

      Case in point, I doubt any parent intends to kill their child by leaving them unattended in a hot car, but they do, and society has a need to punish them for their negligent actions.

      Go watch this, then try and come back here and tell me that stupid bitch shouldn't be punished.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    21. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by mi · · Score: 1

      I doubt any parent intends to kill their child by leaving them unattended in a hot car, but they do, and society has a need to punish them for their negligent actions.

      It is possible, that negligence — causing bad things to happen without any intent — should be punished. But, in your example, the charges brought up against such parents currently are murder (or involuntary homicide, whatever the fine distinction), when it should be just that — negligence.

      Switching to "my" system would raise the punishment for some things, while lowering it for some others. But none of it matters to the case in TFA: the man is not charged with anything but theft.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    22. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by bdo19 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but only for an hour or so per day. And you have to come to wherever my car happens to be at the time. And if someone else is taking their 10 cents worth when you get there, you have to come back later.

      As an aside, if you were to steal 10c worth of my of gas, assuming hypothetically it was possible to prove you only intended to steal 10c worth, not the whole tank, and that it were possible for you to do so without causing any other damage like breaking into the gas door, do you think the police would go out of their way to throw you in jail for this 10c theft? Even if I didn't report it or care, and they just happened to notice?

    23. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ran a red light in a school zone while children were present then you should be charged with reckless driving and arrested, yes.

      Now on the other hand, if you ran a red light at midnight on the out skirts of town, a ticket would of been fine.

    24. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      So, you're okay with SPAM because the stealing of services is inconsequential?

      Umm, no. Let's make a reasonable analogy to this situation. Suppose I have my email address posted on a public website, perhaps as someone employed by a public institution providing public services. Someone emails me for a legitimate reason -- perhaps even offering me a service or something that would be relevant to my work or something in the context of where my email address is posted. But I don't want that service, and perhaps I'm even an inappropriate person to contact about this.

      Now, is this "spam"? Perhaps. But if it was actually a specific contact meant to inform me (hypothetically a public employee) of something the sender thought was appropriate (not a random solicitation or link to some scam site or whatever), the reasonable response is to reply to the email and say: "Please do not send me any more messages like this."

      Case closed.

      If this person continues to actually SPAM my address, after I informed them that the initial contact was inappropriate, then yeah -- I'm in favor of levying HUGE fines and perhaps even putting them in jail. I HATE spam. But a single person targeting a single public official/resource for a reasonable reason one time? Give them a warning, and the person probably just won't do it again.

      [Note I'm not getting into the debate here about whether this was a "safe" thing to do. Maybe it wasn't, and if so, maybe it justifies a ticket and fine... but not what happened.]

      The problem isn't the one guy, it is the one guy, times a factor of a couple thousand others, each getting their own free $.05 charge. Pretty soon you're talking thousands of dollars.

      Your math is off. A "couple thousand" times $0.05 only comes to $100, NOT "thousands of dollars." It would take huge numbers of people doing this at this outlet almost continuously to rack up "thousands of dollars" in electrical charges.

      Stealing is wrong, because it takes from others that which is neither earned or deserved

      Yep. But what if you don't realize it's stealing? What if you legitimately believe it's a public resource? Suppose you go to a coffee shop or something, and there's a little tray sitting out by the cash register that looks like one of those "Give a penny, Take a penny" things. You take five pennies out to help pay for your order. But it turns out that tray was actually a tip "jar". You officially stole 5 cents. Should we arrest you?

      I don't think this guy did something that reasonable. But I don't know what this outlet was generally used for. If students often plugged things like phones in to charge, perhaps this guy might have thought this would be okay. In that case, you tell the guy about his mistake, warn him if he does it again that he'll be ticketed or charged with theft, and go on with your day. Or even write him a ticket, if you want to "send a message." But wait a few days and then go arrest him and make him spend a night in jail?? That seems overkill unless there were something else the guy clearly did wrong.

      It is much easier to stop it now, before it becomes a legal nightmare.

      Fine. Hand out a ticket. Make the guy pay a small fine. Word will get out, and people won't do it any more. Better yet, just turn off the power to the outlet when not in official use, or even just put up a freakin' sign explaining that it's only for official use. Then there's no ambiguity.

      And why are we praising someone who is being a cheap asshat, simply because it is $.05 worth?

      Who is praising him? I'm not praising him. But the punishment should fit the crime. Warning? Yeah. Additional measures to prevent future abuse? Perhaps. Ticket and fine? Maybe, if the guy was a jerk about it or there was some safety issue. Arrest him and keep him in jail? Nope... that's not necessary to get your message across.

    25. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I doubt any parent intends to kill their child by leaving them unattended in a hot car, but they do, and society has a need to punish them for their negligent actions.

      It is possible, that negligence — causing bad things to happen without any intent — should be punished. But, in your example, the charges brought up against such parents currently are murder (or involuntary homicide, whatever the fine distinction), when it should be just that — negligence.

      No, the charge is criminal negligence, and often comes with manslaughter tacked on. To be charged with murder, there has to be intent and/or premeditation.

      So, basically, your argument is based on ignorance of existing law. I'd suggest you brush up before commenting on such topics next time.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    26. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by zlives · · Score: 1

      oh i was just gonna pull up to your garage at your home and do it so as not to inconvenience you too much, while i am at it can i take 10cents of the internet wifi and 10 cents of power from you to for that hour... :)

      "not the whole tank" that's a nice assumption either way.

      yup i could be arrested for just loitering around your car, especially if i am black, yay Rosa, thanks for ending racism (but that's another rant)

    27. Re:Before we get a OMG about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the next time you run a red light should we lock you up for killing the children that could have been crossing the street at that intersection?

      That won't be necessary. How about instead we just send all of you electric vehicle owners a proportionate bill for the gasoline that all of the rest of us burn in our cars? We'll just add it on to your taxes, then you can plug in wherever you like. Does that work for you?

  12. Its the same if he swiped a nickel candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which could possibly still exist in Georgia somewhere, but the idea of theft being a chargeable offense that the state will act against is the founding principle of government. It isn't for the cop to decide which law to enforce or what line exists, if they have such guidelines it would be by legislature or policy shaped by their own local government.

    Don't be a douche and steal electricity. Ask first. Especially if it is a weird electricity hog and yes 1kW is still a hog compared to most chargers.

    1. Re:Its the same if he swiped a nickel candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't for the cop to decide which law to enforce

      I appreciate the principle you're advocating, but that isn't how the world actually works.
      Cops make judgement calls about which laws to enforce all the time.

    2. Re:Its the same if he swiped a nickel candy by mrex · · Score: 2

      It isn't for the cop to decide which law to enforce or what line exists

      Actually, to a degree it is. It's called "discretion", and if police officers didn't have it, the amount of laws on the books would render them ineffective and (even more) disliked by the community. Discretion can be abused, and laws should be written better, but the alternative to police discretion is a bunch of people over because they were going 65.001 MPH on a highway and making people into sex offenders for having a pee in the alley behind the bar at 2AM.

    3. Re:Its the same if he swiped a nickel candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't for the cop to decide which law to enforce or what line exists

      Actually, to a degree it is. It's called "discretion", and if police officers didn't have it, the amount of laws on the books would render them ineffective and (even more) disliked by the community. Discretion can be abused, and laws should be written better, but the alternative to police discretion is a bunch of people over because they were going 65.001 MPH on a highway and making people into sex offenders for having a pee in the alley behind the bar at 2AM.

      I would far prefer consistent enforcement to selective enforcement. If Bush's kids went to jail for underage drinking, perhaps the penalties wouldn't be so severe for mine. Not that I have kids, but still. Most especially for cops who break the law and are almost never punished the way a nonLEO would be. If there are too many laws, get rid of them. I think they should all have sunsets, and should have to be read aloud to be re-passed (at least summary goals of the legislation, if not every bit of code implementation).

  13. Spin that door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA:
    >"A theft is a theft," Sgt. Ford said. When asked if he'd make the arrest again, he answered: "Absolutely."

    Perfect, he's plainly instructed that I use my rights as a citizen to have my citizen-serving government corrected, getting my law enforcement institutions reformed and his pathetic ass fired.

    >rights as a citizen
    >citizen-serving government
    >citizens affect government
    >law serves public
    These ARE all still true, right?

    1. Re:Spin that door by imikem · · Score: 1

      You're new to this planet, I take it.

      --
      Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
    2. Re:Spin that door by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Before you attempt to act against the officer of the law, have the laws changed first.

      Getting mad at someone for doing their job-enforcing the law-you as a citizen has asked them to do is a bit shit.

    3. Re:Spin that door by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No it's not. enforcing the law means you do it properly acting like a public servant, not frigging Judge Dredd style.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Spin that door by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      This office did the exact opposite of Judge Dredd. The guy gets to see a real judge now, not get off scott free.

  14. Dimensional analysis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory comment pointing out that kW is power, kW*hour is energy, and kW/hour is...something else.

    1. Re:Dimensional analysis... by BigMike · · Score: 1

      kW/hour is ... how you get billed

    2. Re:Dimensional analysis... by guibaby · · Score: 1

      KW*h not KW/h

      --
      Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels.
    3. Re:Dimensional analysis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kW/hour is ... how you get billed

      Maybe if you are a duck. But kW is not short for "kWack, kWack, kWack".

      The electricity bills are something else and hopefully rather contain kWh with no slash anywhere.

    4. Re:Dimensional analysis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO. You get billed in kWh, not kW/h.

      FFS! This is simple stuff people...

    5. Re:Dimensional analysis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you are a duck. But kW is not short for "kWack, kWack, kWack".

      akshully is dolan.

    6. Re:Dimensional analysis... by camperdave · · Score: 2

      I don't know about where you're at, but around here, we get billed in dollars and cents.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Dimensional analysis... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      kW/hour is rate of change of power, or how much demand or supply changes over time. Not something a household would need to worry about, but the folks at the power generating stations might make use of such units.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Dimensional analysis... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      kW/h, not kW*h.

      Or are you going to tell me you measure velocity in metres*seconds, not metres/seconds?
      Or Miles * hours, so the faster you're travelling, the smaller the number? 100 miles in 4 hours is not 400 mile per hour, is 25 miles per hour.

    9. Re:Dimensional analysis... by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you talking about? Watts, and thus kilowatts, are a unit of power. Power is the rate of change of energy over time. The rate of change of time, times the time, is thus energy. kW*h is a unit of energy equal to 3.6MJ. On the other hand, kW/h is the rate of change of power output over time, which is only usable in measuring how rapidly a power plant will ramp up in power output.

  15. Officer's No Risk Employment Boost by BoRegardless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He has virtually zero risk in such an arrest.

    He enhances his standing, knows he'll get a conviction and won't face a drunken driver or armed robber. Easy hit for his weekly arrest and ticket actions.

    1. Re:Officer's No Risk Employment Boost by type40 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is one of two things: A new cop looking to make a bust on ANYTHING or the EV owner has prior history with the Police department. I'd lean towards the former more than the latter. The fact the Officer got a warrant makes me think that his supervisors / coworkers goaded him into it. Reminds me of a tactic the NM State Police do to rookies in FTO. The training officer makes the rookie pull over a car going 1-2 mph over the limit and write them a ticket for it. The idea is to make the rookie deal with an irate person and defend an unconventional decision. Of course we in the snow belt have had this kind of problem for years with people plugging their block heaters into any available outlet. My coworker had a neighbor plugging his truck into her house because he didn't have a long enough extension cord to reach an outlet on his house. Of course she was able to handle it with a nasty note on his windshield.

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
    2. Re:Officer's No Risk Employment Boost by rsborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He has virtually zero risk in such an arrest.

      Is this true? What if the arrested individual raises a stink and files suit? The issue here is that cops can do blatantly stupid things (sometimes causing fatalities), paper over it with any one of a number of vague laws being violated (resisting arrest!) and catch no flack for their inept handling of issues.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    3. Re:Officer's No Risk Employment Boost by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 1

      The fact the Officer got a warrant makes me think that his supervisors / coworkers goaded him into it.

      Or the officer just wanted to be a dick. I'm pretty sure judges don't even read warrant requests in the United States, they just stamp everything any officer hands them.

      http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11/05/what-began-as-a-mans-simple-traffic-stop-ended-in-an-unfathomable-12-hour-ordeal-that-is-almost-too-horrific-to-believe/

    4. Re:Officer's No Risk Employment Boost by bored_engineer · · Score: 1

      My coworker had a neighbor plugging his truck into her house . . .

      . . . handle it with a nasty note on his windshield.

      Nah. Too much effort to write a note. Just unplug it and let him discover his new trouble in the morning.

    5. Re:Officer's No Risk Employment Boost by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What if the arrested individual raises a stink and files suit?

      Then the tax payer suffers, never the officer.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Officer's No Risk Employment Boost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep telling yourself that. If it goes to court and it gets in front of a Judge with common sense, the DA and officers could end up feeling butt hurt after the Judge reams them out. I had a friend who hot air ballooned, he landed in a side street and caused a couple cars to have to wait a few minutes while he deflated the balloon and gathered it on the side of the street. A police officer came along while this was happening and cited him for obstructing traffic, the court (clerk) was going to charge him double the usual fee because it was a big obstruction so he told them to set a court date for him. When it came before the Judge he threw the charges out, chewed out the officer and the higher ranking officer with him for showing such a lack of common sense and wasting the courts time. The officer got to hear again from his superior after leaving the court.

  16. This sounds racist by Jharish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bet if the "suspect" was named "John Smith" and white he might not have been arrested.

    I'm surprised that didn't make it into the summary.

    1. Re:This sounds racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *thud* That was the sound of your knee-jerking...

    2. Re:This sounds racist by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unlikely. There is no evidence that the cop saw the defendant before entering his car and preparing the paperwork to fine/arrest him.

    3. Re:This sounds racist by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 0

      I bet if the "suspect" was named "John Smith" and white he might not have been arrested.

      I'm surprised that didn't make it into the summary.

      To add more quotes for you, it's called "Race Baiting."

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:This sounds racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet if the "suspect" was named "John Smith" and white he might not have been arrested.

      I'm surprised that didn't make it into the summary.

      Yep, white people are just gunning for people of color. Why just the other day, I saw a black person sneeze. I called the cops stating that, "I'm being threatened by germ warfare! HELP ME!" and the cops showed up, tazered the black person, patted me on the back for saving America, and proceded to take said black person to jail for endangering the American way Of Life (AOL).

      Now, what we need to do is eliminate these pesky British people who cum all over here and speak in their accents and sound all so "intelligent"! They won't cum on me!!

      We really NEED to stop this British affluence on our population!

    5. Re:This sounds racist by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unlikely. There is no evidence that the cop saw the defendant before entering his car and preparing the paperwork to fine/arrest him.

      Absolutely false. All he has to do is type the license plate into the computer and it shows a picture of the owner, their details and outstanding warrants. An officer not doing this would not be doing his job and during a traffic stop would be putting himself in needless danger.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:This sounds racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And....one fell for it.

    7. Re:This sounds racist by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      There was only a report made on the day. The decision to arrest came days later, AFTER the identity of the man was known to the cop.

    8. Re:This sounds racist by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Well done for confirming your stereotype.

    9. Re:This sounds racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhm, go watch the video where they interview him. He looks pretty run-of-the-mill Caucasian to me.

    10. Re:This sounds racist by Minwee · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unlikely. There is no evidence that the cop saw the defendant before entering his car and preparing the paperwork to fine/arrest him.

      You might want to read about what happened. There's a convenient link near the top of this page. There's even an original source linked from there, if you want to hear the story from the people involved.

      Kaveh Kamooneh parked his car, left, and shortly after that an officer came by to search his vehicle. When Kamooneh returned to the vehicle the officer confronted him, informed him that he should be charged with theft by taking, and then left to file a police report.

      A week and a half later Sergeant Ernesto Ford, who was not the same officer, got an arrest warrant and sent two deputies to Kamooneh's home at 8 PM, a time which conveniently meant that Kamooneh could be booked and placed in a cell, but unable to be released until fifteen hours later.

      Are you trying to tell me that in the eleven days between the original police report being filed and Sgt. Ford preparing the paperwork to send Georgia's Finest around to put him in jail, that he didn't have tje time to look at the name "Kaveh Kamooneh" and compare it to "John Smith"? Even in Georgia it doesn't take that long to sound out the letters and figure out what they say.

      Considering the wonderfully tolerant history of small-town Georgia, where people of all origins and colours are universally welcomed with open arms and considered part of the family by one and all, it's more likely that some members of the Chamblee police department simply don't like electric cars, but there is always the small possibility that one unusual American just might dislike people of Iranian descent and be looking for an excuse to act on that.

      Stranger things have happened.

    11. Re:This sounds racist by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      Guilty until proven innocent?

    12. Re:This sounds racist by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      Your argument makes more sense than those of others. So yes, it's possible.

    13. Re:This sounds racist by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      He does have a picture in the story you know, you don't have to guess the race.

    14. Re:This sounds racist by adolf · · Score: 1

      Wireless data is not universal with regard to police agencies.

      Around here, it is necessary for them to speak into the radio to dispatch. A dispatcher then performs the LEADS request and relays back (again, using their own voice) whatever details seem pertinent.

      (Disclaimer: I learned a lot more about how cops operate by working with and around them, than by watching them on TV.)

  17. Not money, precedent. by Wdomburg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect it is about establishing precedent and combating the idea that EV owners are entitled to "free" power, not about recovering costs in this specific incident.

    1. Re:Not money, precedent. by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with the arrest, you don't get to plug in your car or arc welder into someone else's outlet

    2. Re:Not money, precedent. by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      There is already a large body of law around utility theft. Consequently, there is no precedent to be set.

    3. Re:Not money, precedent. by cbeaudry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think a stern warning or a ticket makes more sense.

      People who say someone should be arrested for something as mundane this, even if he should not have done it, haven't never been arrested before.

      No matter WHAT the reason, you are treated as a dirty murdering rapist while in the cell by the LEO's.

      There is no universe in which this arrest makes any sense. (A ticket... of course).

    4. Re:Not money, precedent. by rubycodez · · Score: 0

      mundane? office couldn't know electrical draw. support someone had four arc welders plugged in on each side of the building and were running up astronomical bill, you'd say that was mundane?

      it's good to bring the hammer down hard on stupid electric car owners who think their being "green" gives them a right to tresspass or skank power.

    5. Re:Not money, precedent. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If you let people get away with it, they will just plug into the same outlet every day. Over an entire year, the amount would add up. It's like saying why ticket somebody for double parking? A single occurrence probably doesn't cause much problems, but if everybody did it, the streets would be completely jammed, and people would be blocked in all the time.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Not money, precedent. by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      I suspect it is about a cop who if he had seen someone charging a cell phone at the same outdoor outlet not have done a damn thing. In fact if he arrested someone for charging a cell phone he'd likely be laughed out of the court. But hey an electric car looks menacing and terrorist related. poor from on the guy charging his car there. but the cop was still being an asshat.

    7. Re:Not money, precedent. by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      This is a PUBLIC outlet.. He pays taxes, so I say he deserves to use the public utility or public property that he supposedly has a share in.

      Now if you step back and actually ask yourself what public property is, then you'll quickly realize it isn't public at all, nor does it belong to you. It belongs to the government, and you're not part of that niche group. That is why he got arrested; he took something that wasn't his.

    8. Re:Not money, precedent. by sjames · · Score: 1

      I absolutely do NOT agree with the arrest. They are wasting a great deal of taxpayer money in pursuit of 5 cents. We do not need a society that petty. They should have made him go to the principal's office and hand over the 5 cents if they were that burned up about it. Then stick a sign on the outlet reading 'not for public use'.

      That way they could use the 5 cents to get some advice on how to handle such things better in the future.

    9. Re:Not money, precedent. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      office couldn't know electrical draw.

      Well not if they were stupid I suppose. But anyone with any intelligence could find out what the power draw of a Nissan Leaf was.

      it's good to bring the hammer down hard on stupid electric car owners who think their being "green" gives them a right to tresspass or skank power.

      I find the inability to use capital letters, and the use of the word 'skank" are an infallible guide to stupid people.

    10. Re:Not money, precedent. by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

      How about education in place of arrest? How is using someone's power outlet on a short term, temporary basis any worse than texting while driving or carrying weed (only ticketable offenses in my state)? Do police not have discretion in that state? "Stop being a dick, move along" would have sufficed. I figure the driver acted more out of ignorance than malice when he plugged in, so why not address it as such and let him off with a warning?

    11. Re:Not money, precedent. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Most cops are right wing. Most right wingers seem to have a petulant problem with anyone that choose to reduce their fossil fuel use. No further explanation needed.

    12. Re:Not money, precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a "stern" warning the same as a warning, but with extra finger wagging?

    13. Re:Not money, precedent. by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

      office couldn't know electrical draw.

      Well not if they were stupid I suppose. But anyone with any intelligence could find out what the power draw of a Nissan Leaf was.

      it's good to bring the hammer down hard on stupid electric car owners who think their being "green" gives them a right to tresspass or skank power.

      I find the inability to use capital letters, and the use of the word 'skank" are an infallible guide to stupid people.

      Do you know how everything in the world works? Well then, you must be a stupid person. Do you use regional dialect that someone else might not understand? Well then, you must be a stupid person. do you occasionally mistype a word in your sentence? Well then, you must be a stupid person.

      --
      Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
    14. Re:Not money, precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with the arrest and the waste of money. Plus the fact that the cops are there to prevent real crimes.

      Charging off of public outlets (and schools are public) is allowed in my opinion. It's not like it happens often anyways, and he was diverting money from going to bad companies and people by driving an electric car too...

    15. Re:Not money, precedent. by mi · · Score: 1

      I agree with the arrest

      Contrary to many people's (including pigs') misconception, arrest in itself is not (supposed to be) punishment. It is only justified, when the suspect may flee — and any time spent behind bars before the trial is deducted from the sentence handed down.

      Given that this man is most unlikely to be sentenced to any jail-time for the alleged crime, arrest is particularly unfair in this case.

      Thus, though you and I agree, that he should be punished for the transgression, there is no way to approve of the arrest.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:Not money, precedent. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      This was theft, not a traffic violation. If you grab someone's purse from your car window, you don't get a ticket.

      I've been arrested. Your description is inaccurate.

    17. Re:Not money, precedent. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      This is a PUBLIC outlet

      No it isn't. Just because something is funded out of taxes, doesn't mean you get to use it whenever you want and however you want.

      When the summary says

      the same outlet one could use to charge a laptop or cellphone.

      it doesn't mean "could" in the sense of "is allowed to" but in the sense of "is plausibly able to"

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    18. Re:Not money, precedent. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Many years ago, when I was at the DMV waiting around for my number to be called, I plugged my laptop in to one of the outlets around the walls. A short time later, a cop came up and told me I couldn't do that. I said "oh, sorry", and unplugged my laptop.

      That is how this story should have gone down.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    19. Re:Not money, precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said he wasn't going to get a ticket at first? I'm guessing the car owner started acting like a real ass once he realized he was going to get into trouble.

    20. Re:Not money, precedent. by bdo19 · · Score: 1

      Seriously? What about your cell phone? Should people be arrested for plugging those into a power outlet in a public place? If no, then where do you draw the line?

    21. Re:Not money, precedent. by bdo19 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If you let people get away with it, they will just plug into the same outlet every day. Over an entire year, the amount would add up. It's like saying why ticket somebody for double parking?

      Partly because anyone familiar with the norms of our society expects to get a ticket for double parking. Nobody familiar with the norms of our society expects to get arrested for charging their EV.

      A single occurrence probably doesn't cause much problems, but if everybody did it, the streets would be completely jammed, and people would be blocked in all the time.

      And, if everyone plugged in their EV to power outlets in public places, then... well, nothing of much consequence would happen.

      Not to mention that the punishment is completely out of proportion with the crime! Basically, you're saying it's ok if they randomly picked this guy to make an example out of?

    22. Re:Not money, precedent. by tftp · · Score: 1

      That is how this story should have gone down.

      The police in this case agrees with you. However the subject refused to say "oh, sorry":

      Wednesday evening, Chamblee City Manager and Police Chief Marc Johnson issued the following statement:

      We received a 911 call advising that someone was plugged into the power outlet behind the middle school. The responding officer located the vehicle in the rear of the building at the kitchen loading dock up against the wall with a cord run to an outlet. The officer spent some time trying to determine whose vehicle it was. It was unlocked and he eventually began looking through the interior after verifying it did not belong to the school system.

      The officer, his marked patrol vehicle and the electric vehicle were all in clear view of the tennis courts. Eventually, a man on the courts told the officer that the man playing tennis with him owned the vehicle. The officer went to the courts and interviewed the vehicle owner. The officer's initial incident report gives a good indication of how difficult and argumentative the individual was to deal with. He made no attempt to apologize or simply say oops and he wouldn't do it again. Instead he continued being argumentative, acknowledged he did not have permission and then accused the officer of having damaged his car door. The officer told him that was not true and that the vehicle and existing damage was already on his vehicles video camera from when he drove up.

      Given the uncooperative attitude and accusations of damage to his vehicle, the officer chose to document the incident on an incident report. The report was listed as misdemeanor theft by taking. The officer had no way of knowing how much power had been consumed, how much it cost nor how long it had been charging.

      The report made its way to Sgt Ford's desk for a follow up investigation. He contacted the middle school and inquired of several administrative personnel whether the individual had permission to use power. He was advised no. Sgt. Ford showed a photo to the school resource officer who recognized Mr. Kamooneh. Sgt Ford was further advised that Mr. Kamooneh had previously been advised he was not allowed on the school tennis courts without permission from the school . This was apparently due to his interfering with the use of the tennis courts previously during school hours.

      Based upon the totality of these circumstances and without any expert advice on the amount of electricity that may have been used, Sgt Ford signed a theft warrant. The warrant was turned over to the DeKalb Sheriffs Dept for service because the individual lived in Decatur, not Chamblee. This is why he was arrested at a later time.

      I am sure that Sgt. Ford was feeling defensive when he said a theft is a theft and he would do it again. Ultimately, Sgt. Ford did make the decision to pursue the theft charges, but the decision was based on Mr. Kamooneh having been advised that he was not allowed on the property without permission. Had he complied with that notice none of this would have occurred. Mr. Kamooneh's son is not a student at the middle school and he was not the one playing tennis. Mr. Kamooneh was taking lessons himself.

    23. Re:Not money, precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CORRECT. This is not about the 5 cents. Its about the many $$$ stollen out of the publics pocket from this action in the past/future by this person and others. You also do not take gas from the school maintenance department gas tank. Also It may have been easier for whoever reported the theft to have the law deal with this verses trying to reprimand the employee about something she may not agree with. Any you would not be able to fire someone over a difference of opinion, you need the law to confirm the infraction. You certainly wouldn't want to deal with the teachers union.

    24. Re:Not money, precedent. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I agree with the arrest, you don't get to plug in your car or arc welder into someone else's outlet

      Why has society become so dumb/antisocial?

      Ask first, most people dont have a problem with you borrowing a few KW of electricity if you're polite about it. If they do, you know beforehand so you either dont do it (or dont be surprised when they call the cops).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    25. Re:Not money, precedent. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Waltz into a public elementary school classroom unannounced and you will quickly learn from the local police that publically funded property is not necessarily for your use.

    26. Re:Not money, precedent. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks for that information.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    27. Re:Not money, precedent. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I think a stern warning or a ticket makes more sense.

      If I understood correctly, the officer did give the Leaf owner a stern warning, and the Leaf owner responded by throwing a tantrum.

      I support the guy's first amendment rights to throw a tantrum, but as a practical matter, throwing a tantrum at a cop really increases your odds of getting arrested.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    28. Re:Not money, precedent. by billd10 · · Score: 0

      You mean saving the planet by buying a yuppie golf cart does not entitle one to use everybody else's electricity? Shocking!

    29. Re:Not money, precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that stern warnings or tickets are appropriate when the crime is well known. No one knows exactly how much he stole without reading outlet-specific meter data, which probable doesn't exist (but can possibly be estimated).

      The silly thing here is that the damages pretty much have to be something small. What's the most a person can extract from a single 15A/115V socket? Like, $20 a *day*!?

    30. Re:Not money, precedent. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Do you know how everything in the world works?

      Pretty much. Over the years I've dismantled most things I didn't previously understand the workings of. And now with the internet, there's really no excuse for not knowing how things work, if you're an engineer.

      Not expecting a cop to be an engineer. But expecting the cops to be able to investigate the contents of a Nissan Leaf Spec Sheet isn't too much. Heaven help them when there's a murder if they can't manage even that much investigation.

    31. Re:Not money, precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who say someone should be arrested for something as mundane this, even if he should not have done it, haven't never been arrested before..

      You've got that right.

    32. Re:Not money, precedent. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      There is also a large body of common-law precedent around the presumption that you are permitted to use publicly accessible outlets. Or do you always ask permission before plugging in your laptop at the airport?

      Where we need to establish precedent is in establishing the line between those extremes.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    33. Re:Not money, precedent. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      As someone mentioned above, by coincidence the cost to deliver N Watts for a full year in the US is about $N. So if that outlet continuously powered a 5W phone charger all year it would cost only $5, and it's a rare courtesy outlet that sees more than a few hours of use per day.

      On the other hand if we establish the precedent that courtesy outlets can be used to charge cars at 1-2kW we're talking $1000-$2000 per year if that outlet sees heavy use, and you know it will. How long do you think courtesy outlets would remain at all common in that case? So the options if we want to keep courtesy outlets would seem to be:

      1) presume EV permission and thus require all outlets to have "No EV" signs if you don't want heavy, expensive charging loads
      2) presume EV prohibition, and have "EV friendly" signs on courtesy outlets outlets you are welcome to charge your car from

      Now, assuming most places with courtesy outlets don't want to start spending many thousands of dollars more per year charging EVs (not to mention the loss of the courtesy outlets for their original purpose), which one of those do you suppose would cause less social cost and disruption?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  18. Water by Dimwit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he filled up his thermos with water from the bathroom sink, would that be theft as well?

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:Water by lunchlady55 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If a stranger was using my outdoor hose / spigot without asking, I might have something to say about it.

    2. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and that's why most places use sillcock valves on outside taps

    3. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you are not a public school.

    4. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course you might and you would be well within your rights., but that has absolutely no correlation to what is happening here..

      Tanks fer Nuttin, Danny!

    5. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was to get a drink of water, I'd ask if he wanted a glass from the house. If it was to water his lawn or fill his pool, I'd ask if there was something wrong with his water and how much he needed.

      I wouldn't try to get someone arrested for it.

    6. Re:Water by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      IANAL.

      If he filled up his thermos with water from the bathroom sink, would that be theft as well?

      Probably not. There are ordinances that dictate that water fountains and in your example public toilets be provided on public property. Permission to use the water for drinking is implied (or actually given by the ordinance).

      Now if you connected a water hose to a spigot and filled up a water tank or washed your car then that would technically be theft.

      There are no ordinances that dictate that free electricity should be provided to charge electric vehicles (or for any use). The subject of the article had no permission to use electricity and therefore committed theft.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But would you really have them arrested for it? (assuming it was the first time you caught them)

    8. Re:Water by schlachter · · Score: 1

      theft is theft.
      besides, water is energy dense.
      hang him.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    9. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because your house is private property. School grounds are public. If they want to protect their electricity, they shouldn't make their outlets accessible in a public space.

    10. Re:Water by acwnh · · Score: 2

      IANAL either, but my understanding of the Constitution is that unless something is explicitly forbidden, it is allowed. If there are no laws restricting the charging of electric vehicles at an (arguably) public outlet, then it is allowed.

    11. Re:Water by berashith · · Score: 1

      i might also. I would say something like " please stop" . No need to escalate to a night in jail for quite some time .

    12. Re:Water by Jawnn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If he filled up his thermos with water from the bathroom sink, would that be theft as well?

      Damn right! Especially if it was a "whites only" sink.

    13. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a stranger was using my outdoor hose / spigot without asking, I might have something to say about it.

      Irrelevant. This happened at a middle school, not a private residence.

    14. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a stranger was using my outdoor hose / spigot without asking, I might have something to say about it.

      Yeah, what would say? Hi there, how are you? You are not seriously implying you would care that someone had some water from a garden hose?

      This just points out the difference between the USA where people are scared and greedy, and the civilised world.

    15. Re:Water by jcochran · · Score: 1

      Kinda silly to think that the reason for sillcock valves are to "prevent thieft". Their purpose is to place the actual valve inside the house where it's warm so you don't have a burst pipe due to freezing in the winter.

    16. Re:Water by sjames · · Score: 2

      How about if that stranger's tax money helped pay for your house?

      He was there to pick up his son (a student at the school) from tennis practice.

    17. Re:Water by Nyder · · Score: 1

      But you are not a public school.

      Public school doesn't mean it's a public building for anyone to use. It's means it's a free, government ran school that anyone in the correct age or knowledge bracket can attend for education.

      In fact, it's very much a NON public zone, you have to have a reason to be in the school. They can, and often do, call the police on people who do not belong there.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    18. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another fine example of the constitution being used incorrectly.

    19. Re:Water by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right. And the outdoor hose is a good analogy.
      But you went off topic, the question is, if you were not there and police saw that stranger and arrested him for theft (without even asking you wanted to press charges), would you think that was OK or perhaps "a bit" too much?

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    20. Re:Water by bmo · · Score: 1

      I would too.

      I would ask him if he wanted a pitcher and some ice.

      Because, y'know, it's a goddamn good thing I found that hose and spigot on the side of the fire station when I was approaching heat-stroke on a hot summer day 40 miles away from home on a bicycle.

      Compassion. Get some.

      --
      BMO

    21. Re:Water by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      If there are no laws restricting the charging of electric vehicles at an (arguably) public outlet, then it is allowed.

      Operative word. The summary possibly gives the misleading impression that all and sundry were free to charge their ipods in this socket, but I suspect it's actually meant to be for the sole use of custodial staff and the like.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    22. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing there're no laws that say I can't take pictures of you from across parking lots and furiously masturbate to them later.

    23. Re:Water by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      I'd be most concerned with a burst pipe from freezing weather. Then at #2 is punk kids turning the water on and flooding the yard. A distant #3 would be theft of water. In my municipality water is not metered so someone can come take all they want and I don't pay more.

    24. Re:Water by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If he filled up his thermos with water from the bathroom sink, would that be theft as well?

      If the school officials had previously told him to stop doing that because he kept getting in the way while doing so? Yes. BTW, the school officials had asked him several times to stop charging his EV there.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    25. Re:Water by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Plus this car owner had been warned by the school in the past to stop using the tennis courts, which is what he was doing at the time the car was plugged in.

    26. Re:Water by tftp · · Score: 2

      He was there to pick up his son (a student at the school) from tennis practice.

      This is not so, according to the police:

      Ultimately, Sgt. Ford did make the decision to pursue the theft charges, but the decision was based on Mr. Kamooneh having been advised that he was not allowed on the property without permission. Had he complied with that notice none of this would have occurred. Mr. Kamooneh's son is not a student at the middle school and he was not the one playing tennis. Mr. Kamooneh was taking lessons himself.

      In other words, he stopped at someone else's tennis courts to play, and decided to plug his car into someone else's outlet. He had no particular right to be there; furthermore, he was previously denied the right to be there by the property managers - and he ignored that.

    27. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a stranger was using my outdoor hose / spigot without asking, I might have something to say about it.

      If a stranger went onto your private property and used your spigot without asking it would be both theft and trespass. However, this was not on private property, it was on public property, that was paid for with his taxes.

    28. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stranger's tax money, allocated across all the other services the municipality provides, would have paid for maybe a thimbleful out of all the water in that thermos. So, no cigar.

    29. Re:Water by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      You are referring to the 9th amendment in the Bill of Rights I believe. "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people". There is no right in the Constitution to individuals being provided every free service available for the functioning of government entities funded by taxpayer dollars. This really isn't a Constitutional question. Arresting the guy was unnecessary, there are almost certainly local and state laws in GA that cover taking low value goods and services you are not explicitly entitled to, and it probably warrants a ticket. But he doesn't have a Constitutional right, or protection from taking free power from the school district without explicit authorization.

    30. Re:Water by sjames · · Score: 1

      The police said that well after I read TFA for one. It's also just what the police said, but I would be embarrassed to be called out for being that incredibly petty too.

    31. Re:Water by sjames · · Score: 1

      Check your math.

    32. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't live in the county and his son didn't attend the school. His son was taking private tennis lessons which used the school's court.

    33. Re:Water by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, he does. Chamblee and Decatur are both in DeKalb county.

    34. Re:Water by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Yes, and taking other people's things without permission is explicitly forbidden. Doesn't really matter whether it's cars, food, or electricity

      What in question here is whether a courtesy outlet presumably provided to power cell phones, lap tops, and other low-power portable devices that people carry with them should also be presumed to be permissible to charge your car from, an activity that draws 10x-100x the power and expense, totalling over $1000/year in most places if the outlet sees near continuous charging use. If that permission is presumed to be granted by availaility then you can bet on one of three outcomes:
      * Courtesy outlets largely disappear from locations within easy reach of EVs
      * Outlets all get labeled with "NO EVs" signs
      * low-amperage circuit breakers are commonly installed to make charging impossible

      Now there's a common theme with all those outcomes - all the costs and inconveniences of imposing restrictions are imposed on the people actually providing or using courtesy power for reasonable purposes, rather than on the EV chargers people being overly presumptive. The only other alternatives that I see are:

      * We change the current norm so that it's presumed that permission must *always* be explicitly granted to use a courtesy outlet - again imposing costs on the providers, but putting up a few "the outlets are for your convenience with the following limitations" signs isn't *that* expensive
      * We recognize that EVs consume far more power than courtesy outlets were generally intended to provide, and require explicit permission for the new heavy users while continuing to allow the status quo presumption of permission for light users.

      Now, of those options, which seems the most reasonable and/or socially desirable? Or can you suggest another outcome?

      As I see it it's not that much different from water fountains - permission is broadly presumed to take a drink, or even fill a water bottle, but there's no reason to presume you've been granted permission to regularly fill a 5000 gallon water tank.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  19. kw/hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many furlongs per fortnight is that?

    FFS.

    1. Re:kw/hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or should I say, furlongs per fortnight per fortnight.

    2. Re:kw/hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you shouldn't say either. Furlongs per fortnight is speed. Furlongs per fortnight per fortnight is acceleration.

  20. That's the night the lights went out in Georgia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Georgia patrol was making their rounds
    So he fired a shot just to flag em down
    A big bellied sheriff grabbed his gun and said
    "Why'd you do it?"

  21. Theft of services by nharmon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean anyone charging a laptop or cell phone will be charged with theft as well?

    Yes, they certainly will.

    1. Re:Theft of services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the instance you are referring to the person was taking from a private business, in this instance it's a publicly funded institution that installed electrical receptacles outside for people to use.

  22. Maybe by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 2

    There is a type of resistance to authority, whose name escapes me at the moment, in which the person protesting follows every rule down to the most mundane detail as a way to stop productivity. It's hard to punish people for because they aren't actually breaking any rules, they're following ALL of them. Maybe the cop was protesting against the massively defective legal system by being this pedantic?

    Nah, he was probably just taking out his frustration on one of them tree huggers. But a man can dream.

    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a type of resistance to authority, whose name escapes me at the moment, in which the person protesting follows every rule down to the most mundane detail as a way to stop productivity.

      Work to rule.

    2. Re:Maybe by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      "Work to rule" is how I've heard it referenced in the past. Follow every rule exactly as it is written and watch the people who wrote them (or enforce them) squirm.

      I agree with you, though, that this is probably not a case of that.

    3. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      malicious compliance?

    4. Re:Maybe by jcochran · · Score: 1

      I believe the term you're looking for is 'White Mutiny'

    5. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stiptheidsaktie is the Dutch word.
      Punctuality-action would be the English translation of that.

      It's a favorite among people that can't legally go on-strike (like military personnel here in The Netherlands) or where a full strike would be risky because of possible emergency situations.
      E.g. hospitals. It's very hard to get the nurses and doctors pulled back quickly from the picket-line or protest-rally when suddenly a dozen victims of a big fire are brought into the hospital. With a "stiptheidsaktie" they are on the job and can revert to normal operation very quickly if needed.

      Couple of years ago air-traffic controllers in Belgium did it too. Very messy; air-traffic all over Western Europe got screwed because of cancelled and delayed flights, missed connections, etc..

    6. Re:Maybe by th3rmite · · Score: 1

      A few years ago some college kids protested the speed limit in Atlanta by going the speed limit and holding traffic up for half an hour. The video was called "55: A Meditation on the Speed Limit" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoETMCosULQ

    7. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Blame the white people for it.

    8. Re:Maybe by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      In the Navy we called it a "white mutiny". It was fairly effective at getting the attention of the chain of command.

    9. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago in the UK, a guy was charged with theft of electricity from a train operator because he plugged his laptop into an outlet on a station platform for a little while. The train company took him to court and he was indeed found guilty of the theft of electricity. The judge made the guy pay for the electricity he stole - less than 1p worth - and made the train company pay his defense costs and for the court's time.

  23. Brown-Sounding Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have been more careful, with that brownish name. That type of person isn't appreciated in 'MERICA.

  24. More equal than others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Kaveh Kamooneh was charged
    >Kaveh Kamooneh

    He sounds sooooo white.

    -AC.J9ma6

  25. De minimis principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    De minimis it comes from the roman law "minimis non curat praetor".
    Basically it means "The praetor does not concern himself with trifles".

    1. Re:De minimis principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      De minimis non curat praetor principle in the court I found this article, it seems they they don't get f* up with this stuff in Europe and I know they don't arrest people for small shit in Brazil as well. Sorry Americans but I have to say, your country is fucked up in yet another way.

    2. Re:De minimis principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      De minimis it comes from the roman law "minimis non curat praetor".
      Basically it means "The praetor does not concern himself with trifles".

      Unfortunately we're not dealing with "praetors", we're dealing with police becoming petty bureaucrats, who are notoriously stringent in adhering to the exact letter of the law. The bureaucrat will pursue you to the ends of the earth over the most trifling matters. One once, and I am not making this up, sent solicitors letters threatening court action to my brother because he made a mistake on a cheque for taxes, leaving them 20 cents short on a bill of over 20 grand. He ignored the first letter thinking it was some kind of absurd joke, given that they had spent multiples of the amount of money they were asking for just by sending that letter. When they threatened court action he went to visit them in person so he could see the look on their faces as he took a few coppers out of his pocket and dropped them on the table.

  26. More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A kilowatt load on a circuit while not unusual is also non trivial. It's plausibly increase the risk of fire in an old wire system particularly one exposed to the outdoor elements. And it's enough to trip a breaker if some other kilowatt load is present. Further this assumes the car itself is working properly. Finally the car owner could be electrocuted or electrocute someone else if the outlet or car is mid misconfugured, exposing the school to risk.

    So he was wrong not to ask permission . The nickel is the least of the problens

    1. Re:More than theft by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's about an 8.3A draw. It's not going to burn down the building, even if another such draw is happening. I'd be surprised if the breakers are rated for anything less than 25A, and wouldn't be surprised to see 40A breakers.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If anyone is going to jail about a fire hazard at a current the fuse will allow, it's probably the electrician or the owner of the property.

    3. Re:More than theft by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 1

      This was in the United States. Our circuits are usually rated for 15A or for heavy duty circuits 20A.

    4. Re:More than theft by chuckugly · · Score: 2

      A standard 115v nominal household (NEMA 5-15p) plug is rated for 15 amps, maximum, although it's not uncommon to run a 12ga wire and protect a compatible receptacle at 20 amps. More than that is unheard of for a 5-15 serving circuit.

    5. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit justification detected. Congratulations, you use the same logic government officials use to get right of your "rights". You should run for office, you would do well.

    6. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you smoking?

      A breaker controlling a 5-15 will not trip until it draws 15.1 or more amps. A breaker connected to a 5-20 won't trip until it sees 20.1 amps.

    7. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you get that out of your A$$, or thin air? You are quite incorrect.

      I'm a BSEE-toting master electrician.

      1) Commercial buildings, like that school, must have minimally 20 Amp minimally circuits- never 15.

      2) A 20 Amp breaker trips at 20 amps. 16 amps is the max continuous load current allowed (80%) but NOT the trip current.

      3) There certainly ARE 40 amp receptacles!! I've installed MANY! Go to your favorite hardware store and look for stove/dryer receptacles and you'll find them. There are several sizes and styles in 30, 40, and 50 amp range, including 3 and 4 prong (4 if neutral is needed - NEVER share ground with neutral!)

      And then you have twist-lock connectors which can go to hundreds of amps...

      Please don't write so authoritatively when you (obvious to me) don't know what you're talking about. You're misleading others who will easily believe you.

    8. Re:More than theft by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

      Hush, don't confuse them with EE jargon.

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    9. Re:More than theft by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the outlet should be fine at 9 amps. If it can't handle that safely, they are in violation of code.

      For reference, the EV was drawing 1 KW. A hair dryer or a sopace heater draws 1.5KW.

      So it's really down to 5 cents worth of electricity.

    10. Re:More than theft by Spoke · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, a 15A breaker may or may not trip at 15.1A. There is quite a bit of fudge room in the spec. You can pull quite a bit more than 15A on a 15A breaker for a short period of time.

      Google for "Circuit Breaker Characteristic Trip Curves" for what may or may not trip a breaker.

      Some interesting facts:

      It is possible to pull between 95-115% of the rated current of a breaker basically indefinitely without it ever tripping.
      It is possible to pull 150-240% of the rated current of a breaker for 60 seconds before it trips.
      It is possible to pull 300-600% of the rated current of a breaker for 10 seconds before it trips.
      It is possible to pull 900-2000% of the rated current of a breaker for 1 second before it trips.

    11. Re:More than theft by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      It's a public outlet. Why shouldn't the public use it?

      It's like the locks they put over many outlets in public places like parks. Unreasonable.

    12. Re:More than theft by Minwee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Finally the car owner could be electrocuted or electrocute someone else if the outlet or car is misconfigured, exposing the school to risk.

      If the school was so badly wired that plugging in to an outlet could cause that kind of damage then someone is exposing everyone in that school to an awful lot of risk, and it's not Kaveh Kamooneh.

    13. Re:More than theft by hey! · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if an electrical load at a friggin' school poses any measurable risk of fire before tripping the breaker, there's a much bigger moral crime being committed here than the theft of $0.05.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:More than theft by mi · · Score: 1

      If the outlet is on the outside wall of a building, it was not placed there to power one's tabletop lamp, but for a tool, high-powered speakers, and/or appliance of some kind — things, that could use that kind of flow (and more).

      Notably, the man is not even charged (no pun) with anything but the theft of electricity, so let's not invent any new transgressions for him.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    15. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is a 40A receptacle, but it looks different. That's the nasty looking one behind some electric ranges.

    16. Re:More than theft by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      The 40 amp ones are usually 240volt circuits. Generally 15 or 20 amp for 110volt lines. I didn't check the math for the 5 cent figure but 8.3amps for 20 minutes is probably less than 5 cents. A 100 watt light draws less than an amp. That's about a third of a penny for 20 minutes at my residential rate. Doing a little math means almost 3 cents. It seems silly but if everyone starts doing that crap those pennies add up. Still, I think chewing his ass out would have sufficed.

    17. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand single-phase ground and neutral are tied together at the breaker box.

      In a 4 wire system I assume there are multiple phases (and therefore do not need a neutral unless there happens to be some aspect of the device that needs a 'normal' 120VAC) but wouldn't the neutral still be tied to the ground ('earth safety') at the breaker box?

      I understand that ground and neutral must be separate wire from junction to breaker boxes and the breaker ground/neutral should be attached to an appropriate ground (e.g. nice long copper spike in the earth).

    18. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trip characteristics for a magnetic type breaker are much different than for a thermal type breaker. The numbers you quote look a lot like a thermal breaker (or a fuse which is also a thermal device). It'll trip when it gets "hot enough" which is why there's a change in time to trip with load. And unstated is that the trip time changes with ambient temperature as well.

      With a magnetic breaker, think of a self contained relay: the current passes through a small coil then through the contacts. When the magnetic flux from the coil is high enough, it pulls in the contact thus breaking the circuit. And of course there's some mechanics to ensure that it stays open until a person resets it. All in all a much more controlled situation where you won't see anything like 200+% rated current for even a full second.

    19. Re:More than theft by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      Or, if a breaker is getting old, it can start tripping at less than 100% of rated load.

      Source: my electric clothes dryer was drawing 29.9A and started tripping the 30A breaker after 3 years of no problems.

      Replace breaker, no more trips.

    20. Re:More than theft by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not about 5 cents, it's the principle of taking something that's not yours. The arrest also probably was precipitated more by a personality clash between the car owner, school personnel, and officer at the scene, but you can't arrest someone for being an obnoxious jerk, not on paper anyway.

      However, if every parent driving to every school in the county started recharging their cars while parked there, it would create load issues, and require additional electrician work that would probably cost far more than the first year's electrical load. Now, we're talking about thousands of dollars here, in a State that is also known for having a mortician that dumped bodies out in the woods and gave people fireplace ash in urns, just to save on gas costs for cremation.

      On the other hand, I think the cop in question should really get off the electrical outlet patrol and go back to writing tickets on drivers who are texting while stopped at red lights.

    21. Re:More than theft by robot256 · · Score: 1

      You would be far better served by installing a 40A breaker. Then you won't have to replace it again in 3 years, and you'll be code-compliant to boot. That's why you're supposed to size a breaker to be 25% more than your maximum continuous load.

    22. Re:More than theft by sjames · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying they shouldn't tell him that the outlet is NOT for his use. Or even put up a sign to that effect. That done, if someone charges their car from it anyway, charge them the 5 cents plus a $10 administrative fee. I wouldn't be that upset if they sent him that bill instead of the crazy arrest.

      It's not like they would have hundreds of people charging though, there aren't that many outside outlets within reach of a parking space.

    23. Re:More than theft by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which raises the question: why did Nissan design it to only pull 1KW from a slow enough 110V outlet when it was perfectly capable of delivering 1.5KW?

    24. Re:More than theft by danomac · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to my friend's jet tub. Breaker wore out I guess. Replaced it and no problems since.

    25. Re:More than theft by odie5533 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you sure the wire gauge he's using is capable of safely delivering 40 A? You can't just upgrade a breaker and get more electricity. Not safely at least.

    26. Re: More than theft by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Did you even read tfs? It doesn't draw 1kw, it draws 1kw/hour, that little energy over the life of the car is practically nothing.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    27. Re: More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Breakers are sized according to the wire size in the wall so that they don't heat up and start a fire, the entire circuit must be designed for the load, not just the breaker. A 30amp breaker should be connected to 10 gauge wire. 40 amp breaker use 8ga wire. You must also use the appropriate plug that is different for each amp rating.

      Also note that as gauge decreases the wire diameter increases.

    28. Re:More than theft by rikkards · · Score: 1

      And usually it is recommended to build the circuit for 80% continual usage which is around 1200W.

    29. Re:More than theft by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What makes you think it's there for the benefit of the public? It's more likely there for the sole use of custodial/maintenance staff.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    30. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's really down to 5 cents worth of electricity.

      And you expect a cop to memorize the power draw of each brand of electric car, the maximum amperage of each type of wall socket, the regional power rates and supervise the charging process until such time when a crime has been committed ? A Tesla can suck up to 50 Amps from a wall socket if the circuit doesn't break. That's 60KWh in 10 hours or 22$ in say Hawaii. A single unprotected socket can cost the school hundreds per month.

      The issue here is much simpler: the electric asshole was abusing something provided as a courtesy for charging phones etc. which have negligible draw or for lawnmowers and the like which are used for the school's benefit. He had absolutely no right to connect a non- negligible consumer to the school's socket and the cop stopped the asshattery (I agree the arrest is overkill).

    31. Re:More than theft by tftp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wouldn't be that upset if they sent him that bill instead of the crazy arrest.

      The Leaf owner in question is a habitual troublemaker who violated orders of the property owner already (per the link to 11alive.) He also argued with the cop and refused to admit a mistake. (If he did that, the cop would let him go.)

      Such a person would throw that bill away and come to that school to recharge as matter of teaching them a lesson. An arrest record is just deserts for this behavior, if the report is accurate. The society does not need antisocial egotists.

      It's not like they would have hundreds of people charging though, there aren't that many outside outlets within reach of a parking space.

      Expect all outdoor outlets to be locked as soon as enough EVs start charging without permission. The liability is far greater than the cost of stolen energy.

    32. Re:More than theft by msauve · · Score: 3, Informative

      "There certainly ARE 40 amp receptacles!! I've installed MANY!"

      There's NEMA 5-30, 5-50, 6-30, 6-50, 10-30, 10-50, etc. Where do I find a NEMA x-40? I won't limit you to naming a favorite hardware store - name anywhere on the Internet.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    33. Re:More than theft by tftp · · Score: 1

      You can plug your own cord that is damaged. Then the cord kills a child (who would be likely to be near a school, and would be likely to touch the cord or the car.) The car owner and the school will be both responsible. Why would the school want any of that? They have neither duty to, nor benefit from letting strangers charge their cars. They would do the right thing if they install locked covers at all outlets.

    34. Re: More than theft by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I don't think the amps change dramatically for the voltage, in fact I think the voltage is to save amps. I'm just guessing, but I bet a 40 amp dryer is so that it can run at 110. Though I don't really know, the dryers e had have been 110 and 20 amp, but really woulda benefitted from double the power (still, gas is king in overall wattage, one of the wins to city living ).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    35. Re:More than theft by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      1) Commercial buildings, like that school, must have minimally 20 Amp minimally circuits- never 15.

      I work in an older industrial facility. All the old crap (1960s-1980s) typically has 15A circuits, with a lot more receptacles per circuit than the newer additions. That said it looks like this school dates from 2006, so it should have 20A circuits.

    36. Re:More than theft by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Wrong in every possible way.

      You can not put a 40 amp breaker on a line with a 10 amp outlet. It is illegal and dangerous. Normal outlets, are 10 amp outlets. $100 says you've never used an outlet capable of carrying 40 amps other than your washer/drawer/stove. My shitty 30 year old fridge is a 30amp. I doubt you could point one out in a line up without me telling you first.

      Sure, you can physically do it, if your a moron too stupid to be playing around in the electrical box in the first place. You'll probably be electrocuted due to your own stupidity pretty quickly with that kind of ignorance.

      A 10 amp breaker will easily blow at 8 if its got any age on it, they are designed to failSAFE not carry more than intended. Yes, they may be slow acting, but you are pushing a 10 amp breaker if you put a continuous 8amp draw on it. Its perfectly within spec, but safety margins are going to cause it to blow sooner rather than later.

      Outlets have to match breakers.

      A 50, 30, 20 and 10 amp outlet ALL look different. Only the a plug designed for a 10 amp outlet can be plugged into a 20 amp outlet, all others are intentionally incompatible with each other. You can not plug a 40 amp plug into a 30 amp outlet, or a 30 amp plug into 20 or 10 amp outlet. You can't even plug a 20 amp plug into a 10 amp outlet. They are designed to keep morons like you from burning your houses down because you're dumb ass does something like swap out a breaker. With a 40 amp breaker, you would be using a 50 amp outlet as there isn't a 40 amp outlet.

      50 amp outlet - http://www.mscdirect.com/product/74366394?src=pla&008=-99&007=Search&pcrid=15557577904&006=15557577904&005=21882504424&004=4409695744&002=2167139&mkwid=sJXegN7a0%7Cdc&cid=PLA-Google-PLA+-+Test_sJXegN7a0_PLA__15557577904_c_S&026=-99&025=c

      30 amp outlet - http://www.mscdirect.com/product/74366410?src=pla&008=-99&007=Search&pcrid=15557577904&006=15557577904&005=21882504424&004=4409695744&002=2167139&mkwid=sJXegN7a0%7Cdc&cid=PLA-Google-PLA+-+Test_sJXegN7a0_PLA__15557577904_c_S&026=-99&025=c

      20 amp outlet - http://www.mscdirect.com/product/89534770?src=pla&008=-99&007=Search&pcrid=15557577904&006=15557577904&005=21882504424&004=4409695744&002=2167139&mkwid=sJXegN7a0%7Cdc&cid=PLA-Google-PLA+-+Test_sJXegN7a0_PLA__15557577904_c_S&026=-99&025=c

      10 amp outlet - http://www.mscdirect.com/product/89534796?src=pla&008=-99&007=Search&pcrid=15557577904&006=15557577904&005=21882504424&004=4409695744&002=2167139&mkwid=sJXegN7a0%7Cdc&cid=PLA-Google-PLA+-+Test_sJXegN7a0_PLA__15557577904_c_S&026=-99&025=c

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    37. Re:More than theft by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the movie "Outsoruced?" If so, or not, imagine how you would rig an office roof, in India, to power 20 computers.

      In Georgia, I could imagine extension cords and gang outlet strips being plugged into outlets with total disregard for load ratings, it will only stop when the breaker blows...

    38. Re:More than theft by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Sold the house instead, problem solved.

      Thinking back on it, the breaker ran more like 5 years, in my ownership, without problems - replaced it and the new one ran for 2 years without problem.

      As others have pointed out, just up-rating a breaker is... um... dumb? Sure, you can do it and get away with it, but this particular clothes dryer had a couple of problems during our first year of ownership, problems that led to big lengths of wire inside it burning off all their insulation. It was all serviced by certified a technician (literally named Bubba and unable to spell the words he writes on invoices, but I actually have confidence in his ability to fix a clothes dryer - they really are that simple, and it has run for six years since his repairs without problems....) So, back to why it's dumb... see, if the dryer had a different problem and started drawing too much current from the outlet instead of internally, that burning insulation could happen inside the walls, on the 40 year old crispy dry wooden wall studs.

      I bought a 60 year old house once, there was some old, dry, loose wood in the crawl-space that I removed and lit in the fireplace, if you think lighting a christmas tree on fire is impressive, try wood that hasn't seen water for 60 years - it virtually went off like a bomb, blowing hot air and sparks faster than the chimney could take them up - and this was a very big, clean chimney that didn't blow back like that with a firebox stoked with dry split pine logs...

    39. Re: More than theft by crdotson · · Score: 1

      You can bring your own car in which comes out of gear and smushes a poor child. Clearly the right thing to do is to lock the parking lot so that dangerous cars can't be brought in.

    40. Re:More than theft by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Which raises the question: why did Nissan design it to only pull 1KW from a slow enough 110V outlet when it was perfectly capable of delivering 1.5KW?

      Because many outlets are on shared circuits...

    41. Re:More than theft by sjames · · Score: 1

      So? If the breaker trips, that's the end of the charging. It's not exactly hard to reset a breaker. I don't know where you got the bizarre idea that the whole town is filled with hardened electricity thieves ready to go at it like Mad Max.

      Really, it's just one guy with an electric car that used a whole 5 cents worth of power. They probably waste far more than that daily by not tuning their buses up.

    42. Re:More than theft by sjames · · Score: 1

      He was arrested days later. They had plenty of time to figure out that it wasn't worth anything more than issuing a citation or even just a warning.

      A Tesla cannot draw 50 amps from a standard wall socket because a standard wall socket will only provide 15. It's illegal to wire it to provide more and it's illegal to affix a 15 amp plug to a device that will draw more than 15 amps. Next step up is a NEMA 5-20 which can provide 20 amps. There is a standard for 30 and 50 amps as well but those are incompatible with a regular plug.

      if you draw full load from the outlet continuously for a full month it would cost $132 at residential rates. But clearly he wasn't doing that since he would need to drive home.

      As for entering the vehicle to see who the owner was, nonsense. All they had to do was run the tag number.

    43. Re:More than theft by sjames · · Score: 2

      So issue a citation. If he throws that away, then they can take more serious action.

      The addendum to the report was added this evening, after this story came out. It is notable though that the claims against him are just that and don't make a lot of sense. Why would the officer search the car to determine the owner when there is a tag right there on the back? Why isn't he up for trespassing if he was told he is no longer welcome on the court? Why are they spending hundreds of dollars over 5 cents?

    44. Re:More than theft by AaronW · · Score: 1

      Most NEMA 5-15 outlets are on 20A circuits. Long-term (over 3 hours) loads on a circuit are supposed to be limited to 80% of capacity so even a 15A circuit should be able to handle a steady 12A (80%) just fine. That's why most 110v devices usually limit themselves to 12A.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    45. Re:More than theft by AaronW · · Score: 1

      Most electric dryers are limited to 24A or less since appliances typically are limited to 80% what the circuit is rated at.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    46. Re:More than theft by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      "1) Commercial buildings, like that school, must have minimally 20 Amp minimally circuits- never 15."

      Well I work in a building built in the 1980s, (not that old) and its mostly 15 amps dude (zoned commercial). As you may know, 20 amp circuts always have a T shape on one of the prongs. Easy to recognize. Perhaps new buildings are all 20amp, however when we recently installed an addition to the building, it is all wired 15amp as well.

      --
      -
    47. Re:More than theft by tftp · · Score: 1

      A school has no right to issue a citation to anyone. Only the police and the court can do that. That's why the school manager called 911. Only the police can approach an individual and initiate a possibly hostile contact. This is because they have the right to use force. You do not, generally.

      The addendum to the report was added this evening, after this story came out.

      I started suspecting that when I went to the middle of the discussion on Slashdot, and everyone was stuck with the same wrong facts.

      Why would the officer search the car to determine the owner when there is a tag right there on the back?

      Maybe there wasn't any? Maybe he wanted to make sure that the owner is not inside? Otherwise I don't know. That is a good question. But the responding officer could do that, and more, anyway - he was on an official assignment, he had a prima facie [petty] crime, so he had an investigation to investigate.

      Why isn't he up for trespassing if he was told he is no longer welcome on the court?

      Another good question. Maybe because the school just told him to stay away, but there was no restraining order from the judge?

      Why are they spending hundreds of dollars over 5 cents?

      Well, that is easy. If the minimal cost of processing a misdemeanor is $100, it doesn't mean that you can go about and commit $99 misdemeanors all you want. The society wants to prevent such behavior, no matter the cost.

    48. Re:More than theft by AaronW · · Score: 1

      On a standard 110V outlet no car will draw more than 12A. Car charging is limited to 80% of the outlet's rated current. For example, my Tesla is capable of drawing up to 80A for charging. With a 50A plug it limits itself to 40A. With a 30A plug it limits itself to 24A, and a 15A plug it limits itself to 12A. No car will draw over that unless the owner did something to jury-rig their car charger. According to code you are not allowed to draw more than 80% of the rated current continuously.

      In my case at home I installed an 80A charger which required a dedicated 100A circuit.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    49. Re:More than theft by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yep all are required to pump out more than the maximum outlet is rated for. Just because an outlet is rated for 10A doesn't mean the circuit breaker is.

      Or do you routinely trip out your house by turning on the hair drier? The Nissan Leaf pulls about 1/3rd of the power of a typical space heater. Heck it pulls less than my home entertainment system which shares the circuit with the kitchen including fridge, freezer, kettle, coffee machine, microwave, oh and the study which has about 3 computers whirring away continuously too.

    50. Re: More than theft by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      It's the length of the run too.

      Here's a little chart I found with a quick Google search.

      So 30A on 10 gauge works fine at 10 feet. It doesn't work so well at 500 feet.

      And not that physics changes, but there are different rules in different areas. I may be able to install 10 gauge wire for a run here. Someone in the next city may be required to use 8 gauge for the same length run. That's why you're suppose to have a licensed local contractor doing work. You might know it's safe. It may not be done according to local code.

      Now everyone, go back to setting up your Christmas lights. :) Tis the season for house fires.. flalalalalaaa lalalaa laaa laaa.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    51. Re:More than theft by sjames · · Score: 1

      A school has no right to issue a citation to anyone.

      If only the police were involved...

      As for the rest, all we have is a statement from police, not confirmed facts. Their statement shows a few inconsistencies.

      You can see if someone is inside without opening the door, and unless/until you know it is not a school vehicle and that the owner does not have permission to plug in, you do not have evidence of a crime in progress. You can be charged with trespassing even if you were only verbally notified that you are no longer welcome.

      Police can do a search for evidence when they have reasonable suspicion of a crime, but that search must be related.

      Well, that is easy. If the minimal cost of processing a misdemeanor is $100, it doesn't mean that you can go about and commit $99 misdemeanors all you want. The society wants to prevent such behavior, no matter the cost.

      No, but it does mean it makes a lot more sense to issue a citation. It's much cheaper and still makes repeat offenses clearly much more trouble and expense than it's worth for the offender.

    52. Re:More than theft by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Right, but if that circuit already has 9A of load on it, the breaker will pop. It doesn't matter that the particular outlet has nothing plugged into it. ... as I've tried to explain to so many people who ask why circuit breakers pop and turn off half their house. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    53. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes sir. It is our most modestly priced receptacle.

    54. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Commercial buildings, like that school, must have minimally 20 Amp minimally circuits- never 15.

      Is that the regulation in that state? When was that regulation put in place in that state? When was that school building built?

    55. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, thank you for confirming with your BSEE that the car could draw 16A all day long without tripping the breaker, since that's what I said, and not that it would trip at that draw.
      Second, from the article "the same outlet one could use to charge a laptop or cellphone" means its a 110V outlet. That limits it to NEMA 5, which only have 15, 20 and 30A receptacles defined. That there are higher draw outlets for 220V applications like stoves and dryers is not relevant to this article. I restricted my comments to only that which was relevant, not to anything possible.
      Third, being that you are a master electrician, I'm sure you are aware that A] Building code regulations vary state-to-state and B] vary over time. Given that, the possibility that it was in fact a NEMA 5-15 receptacle is possible without knowing the particular building codes applicable, or when the building was constructed. I gave both 15A and 20A receptacles as an option since I couldn't reasonably determine which might have been used.
      Fourth, you are an angry man. Perhaps you should seek counselling in this matter.

    56. Re:More than theft by sribe · · Score: 1

      Did you get that out of your A$$, or thin air? You are quite incorrect.

      No, actually, he is 100% correct.

      2) A 20 Amp breaker trips at 20 amps.

      Bullshit. That right there is so completely wrong that it makes me doubt that you're actually a master electrician--and if you are, then you certainly are not a competent one.

      16 amps is the max continuous load current allowed (80%) but NOT the trip current.

      16 amps is max design load allowed on the circuit by code, not the max continuous load the breaker will carry without tripping.

    57. Re: More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't tell if this is a woosh or you are just ignorant.

    58. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also argued with the cop and refused to admit a mistake. (If he did that, the cop would let him go.)

      That is some bullshit rationalization. "Cops can be bullies if you don't tell them you're super sorry."

    59. Re:More than theft by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Really, it's one guy with a bad attitude who ticked off the cop, and likely a cop with a bad attitude who set the guy off, too. However, in our society, sworn officers have the power of arrest as long as they have just cause. Theft is legal grounds - whether theft of 5 cents worth of electricity is just cause for arrest is up to a Judge to decide. See: small town Georgia Judges: relationship to peace officers for probable outcome.

    60. Re:More than theft by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Kill-A-Watt said that mine wasn't.

    61. Re:More than theft by sjames · · Score: 1

      A breaker trip is hardly a mortal danger.

    62. Re:More than theft by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Most electric dryers are limited to 24A or less since appliances typically are limited to 80% what the circuit is rated at.

      I don't think there is any such limit, as you state. It is perfectly fine to sell a vacuum cleaner, treadmill, or power drill labeled "15A" that draws 15 amps from the wall.

      Another possible reason that this dryer started tripping a 30A breaker is that as it aged, the motor started to draw more power. If it was working with a maximum draw of 28A, but started to draw more juice as the bearings in the drum motor dried out, it could very well start bumping up against 30A. Replacing the breaker that was doing its job with one with a looser tolerance would make it appear that the breaker was "wearing out". Circuit breakers just don't degrade in that way; there's nothing in the circuit inside them except a piece of wire.

    63. Re: More than theft by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      I don't think the amps change dramatically for the voltage, in fact I think the voltage is to save amps. I'm just guessing, but I bet a 40 amp dryer is so that it can run at 110. Though I don't really know, the dryers e had have been 110 and 20 amp, but really woulda benefitted from double the power (still, gas is king in overall wattage, one of the wins to city living ).

      No company would produce a 110V 40A dryer, since no one would buy it. No home is wired for such a beast.

    64. Re:More than theft by n7ytd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you have an electrical outlet on the outside wall of your home? A water faucet? Please let us all know where we can come and charge and wash our EVs at your expense.

      When you go into a restroom in a park, do you take a couple of rolls of toilet paper home? It's there for the public, after all.

    65. Re:More than theft by DQKennard · · Score: 1
      "The Leaf owner in question is a habitual troublemaker who violated orders of the property owner already (per the link to 11alive.) He also argued with the cop and refused to admit a mistake. (If he did that, the cop would let him go.)

      Well, sure, if you're going to go ahead and read the linked article that shows it's not really about stealing electricity.

      From the article, I see the guy had previously been explicitly told by the school not to use the tennis courts without permission. He wasn't even supposed to be there, so maybe in hindsight the correct charge would have been trespassing. And, also in hindsight, maybe being such a dick didn't really work out that well for the guy.

    66. Re:More than theft by Reziac · · Score: 1

      My neighbor managed to pull 30A on a 15A standard outlet long enough to melt the extension cord.

      (Here's a hint: never put two 15A tank heaters on one 14ga. extension cord.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    67. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get that out of your A$$, or thin air? You are quite incorrect.

      I'm a BSEE-toting master electrician.

      1) Commercial buildings, like that school, must have minimally 20 Amp minimally circuits- never 15.

      2) A 20 Amp breaker trips at 20 amps. 16 amps is the max continuous load current allowed (80%) but NOT the trip current.

      3) There certainly ARE 40 amp receptacles!! I've installed MANY! Go to your favorite hardware store and look for stove/dryer receptacles and you'll find them. There are several sizes and styles in 30, 40, and 50 amp range, including 3 and 4 prong (4 if neutral is needed - NEVER share ground with neutral!)

      And then you have twist-lock connectors which can go to hundreds of amps...

      Please don't write so authoritatively when you (obvious to me) don't know what you're talking about. You're misleading others who will easily believe you.

      I JUST LEARNED SOMETHING THANKS!!

    68. Re:More than theft by highphilosopher · · Score: 1

      While I'm not the original AC here, I believe he's thinking of a dual pole. This example from Home Depot is technically a 40 amp breaker. It's really two 20 amps smacked together, but it IS a 40 amp breaker.

      http://www.homedepot.com/p/GE-Q-Line-40-Amp-2-in-Double-Pole-Circuit-Breaker-THQL2140/100356512?cm_mmc=shopping-_-googleads-_-pla-_-100356512&skwcid&kwd=&ci_sku=100356512&ci_kw=&ci_gpa=pla&ci_src=17588969#.UqDKRMRDtCs

    69. Re:More than theft by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I'm an MSEE-toting high voltage engineer, but back when I tested circuit breakers at Bulldog Electric, they had to hold at 110%, and trip at 135% over some seconds. That was a thermal trip, which heated up the breaker until it decided there was an overload; the biger the overload, the shorter the trip time. During a short circuit the magnetic trip would open immediately at a large amperage.

    70. Re:More than theft by msauve · · Score: 1

      breaker != receptacle. I'm pretty sure that code allows a breaker to be less than the outlet's rating. You might even be able to have a 15 A breaker and wiring going to a 50 A receptacle, if you wanted. But the claim was that 40 A receptacles exist.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    71. Re:More than theft by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The Kill-A-Watt probably went poof if you somehow managed to plug it into a 230V circuit.

    72. Re:More than theft by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      What's unreasonable is the way you think.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    73. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He also argued with the cop and refused to admit a mistake."

      Son, this is /. You want a pro-authoritarian circlejerk, head BACK over to reddit.

      In the really real world, "refusing to admit a mistake" is not an arrestable offense. Neither is arguing with a cop.

      What is curious to me is your low user number, indicating a join date some time in, oh, 1997 or so? How did you last this long with such a pro-authoritarian attitude? Did you buy the account from someone?

    74. Re:More than theft by tftp · · Score: 1

      In the really real world, "refusing to admit a mistake" is not an arrestable offense. Neither is arguing with a cop.

      It makes a big difference. In one case you are an honest person who violated the law by mistake. The cop will explain the law to you, and let you go. In another case you are insisting that the law does not apply to you just because, and you are arguing with a cop who knows the law better than you do. In such case the cop will conclude that you violated the law intentionally, or with wanton disregard for rights of others - and then you will get a different treatment. Why would that be unfair? It's exactly how police officers are *supposed* to operate - to protect the innocent and to stop the guilty from doing harm. In this case the responding officer did everything by the book.

      What is curious to me is your low user number, indicating a join date some time in, oh, 1997 or so? How did you last this long with such a pro-authoritarian attitude?

      "If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain."

      I do not automatically approve everything that the police does. Far from that. However in this case the EV owner went too far: he plugged his car into someone else's outlet, then insisted that it's his right to use the outlet, and then insisted that the cop damaged his car. If he is not one lying SOB, I don't know who would be. Conservative people value honesty and respect rights of others.

    75. Re:More than theft by swalve · · Score: 1

      The breaker protects the wires. It is meant to trip before the wires connected to it get damaged. If it is installed up to code, anyway.

    76. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSEE / electrician AC here (alternating current and anonymous coward!) - Oh, I feel so sad! I've been into electronics since I was a kid. I wish they made this stuff more interesting and taught it in schools...

      Anyway, the double-pole breaker you linked to is for 240V.

      The way most houses are wired, you have 240V coming from the POCO (POwer COmpany) transformer. The output of the transformer, which feeds your house, has 3 terminals. The middle terminal is a "center-tap" and it gets connected to ground and is also the neutral (white) wire in the house wiring.

      The 2 end terminals each give you 120V with respect to the center tap / neutral / ground terminal. So a circuit connected to 1 breaker gives you 120V back to neutral.

      If you connect something to both 120V terminals, from end-to-end, you get 240V - hence the double breaker.

      By NEC code you are not allowed to have 2 separate breakers feeding 1 device or outlet. So if one trips, they both must trip- hence the mechanical link between the 2 handles.

      Hope that helps! I should start a school. Ask any questions- I'll check back.

      I have a login here, BTW, but lost the pw, and clicking on the "send my pw" or whatever doesn't work, and the admins have never been any help getting it back...

    77. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "T" shape is for a 20 amp outlet, which is not necessarily connected to a 20 amp circuit.

      Non-"T" shape 120V outlets are 15 amp rated, but are connected to 20 amp circuits every day. They are. I'm not lying to you. Check with other electricians. I agree it may not make sense, but it's fact.

    78. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) A 20 Amp breaker trips at 20 amps.

      Bullshit. That right there is so completely wrong that it makes me doubt that you're actually a master electrician--and if you are, then you certainly are not a competent one.

      I'm not sure who you are or what you do for a living, but I hope you retire soon. You're the kind of person who makes this world an unhappy place. You take things out of context and make a fight where there was no problem.

      In fact I'm more competent than most electricians, and all other electricians and inspectors I know tell me this.

      Other than writing this, I really don't care what you think or write. I'm doing what every electrician does every day and I don't care, or need to care, what actual amperage a given breaker trips at. I know I use a 20 amp breaker with 12 gauge wire to feed outlets and my work is stellar, passes all inspections, is done right, is to code, and you're the only idiot grumbling. There are millions of references on the 'net so go do some research.

      As a BSEE who's worked in several manufacturing industries for many years, I know that nothing is exact or perfect, but for useful practical purposes, we hope a 20 amp breaker trips at 20 amps. I never said anything about time. In fact, many large high-inrush current devices, like 50 HP motors, require time-delay breakers. If you want to research the statistics on breaker trip current and time curves, knock yourself out. I find it mostly useless because I'm going to put 20 amp breakers in most outlet feeding circuits and your ignorance is not going to change what's NEC code nor what's done in wiring everyday.

      16 amps is the max continuous load current allowed (80%) but NOT the trip current.

      16 amps is max design load allowed on the circuit by code, not the max continuous load the breaker will carry without tripping.

      You love to make yourself feel good by re-wording things to make it sound like the original person was incorrect, when in fact both sentences say the same thing. I'm sorry if you don't see it.

      16 amps is max design load allowed on the circuit by code because 16 amps is 80% of the 20 amp rating of the circuit breaker. Fixed it for you Einstein.

    79. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand single-phase ground and neutral are tied together at the breaker box.

      Yes, and NEC and other sticklers like to use the word "bonded" (for "tied").

      It's very important to note: this bond is ONLY to be done at the main service panel. "Sub-panels" MUST have separate ground and neutral wires connecting back to the main panel, and separate busses in the sub-panel.

      Most breaker panels have 2 busses and they give you a special screw or tie link that you use only at the main service panel.

      In a 4 wire system I assume there are multiple phases (and therefore do not need a neutral unless there happens to be some aspect of the device that needs a 'normal' 120VAC) but wouldn't the neutral still be tied to the ground ('earth safety') at the breaker box?

      By "4 wire" I'll assume you mean 3-phase for the purposes of this answer. Yes, like you said in both single-phase and 3-phase devices it is possible to not need a neutral. Neutral is usually only needed if something in the device needs 120V, but there are many devices which do not need neutral, so often no neutral wire (white) is run to the device. And the plug/outlets are designed with or without a neutral, but often this bigger stuff is "hard wired" (no plug/socket). You have to check and see if the device needs neutral.

      Neutral is not for "earth safety" - it is the center-tap of the power transformer. You could think of it as a ground return path if you were to compare it to DC electronic circuits, like op-amps with a + and - supply. But yes, neutral is connected (bonded) to the safety ground wires AND a ground rod (or many) at the main service panel.

      I understand that ground and neutral must be separate wire from junction to breaker boxes and the breaker ground/neutral should be attached to an appropriate ground (e.g. nice long copper spike in the earth).

      Yes, ground and neutral must be separate conductors (wires.) It's a safety issue- NEC want the grounding conductor to be able to carry the current and the concern is that if ground and neutral were one in the same, a ground-fault would add more current and could possibly overload the ground conductor. It's just better and safer to keep them separate.

      In hospitals and many other special situations we use "isolated ground" receptacles. They're really expensive! The only difference is that the ground wire is insulated from the metal mounting bracket. They can cost $40 for hospital-grade ones! The wire for such circuits would typically be: black for the "hot", white for neutral, green for metal box ground, and green / yellow stripe for the ground pin (connector to device). The concern is that a ground-fault could (would) induce a current in the ground wire which could cause current to flow in a patient (a very real possible scenario) with patient-connected equipment like ECG and EEG (I've worked in those fields too). With a dedicated ground to your bod, it's less likely that a ground-fault would cause current to flow through you.

      Yes, a building ground rod ("grounding electrode") is required. They are supposed to be tested for conductivity to the Earth, and some areas require more than one depending on soil, etc. Most standard rods are steel with either copper or zinc cladding. Larger commercial buildings might require many rods. Often the grounding is embedded under the foundation footer (I don't know the details- it's done by other people and I just connect to it) and the building frame is all bonded.

    80. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSEE guy here (wow these conversations get messy! People are misunderstanding me like crazy.)

      Thank you for the info! Mega respect to you. I'll be honest- I didn't know those exact percentages. I had hoped people would understand that it doesn't matter because I'm going to install a 20 amp breaker and 12 gauge wire (depending on length and environmental heat). In other words, it's not like you can buy 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, etc. amp breakers and have to do all kinds of math! I have had to order 35, 55, and a few other special sizes for specific devices that required it. (55 amp is for 6 gauge Romex, but I digress).

      A good friend of mine has a 1950s house with a Bulldog! Pushmatic! Those things kill me! I coerced him to buy some tandems on ebay and I put them in for him this past summer (kit renovation- many new circuits). Bulldog lives on! As I recall it was a little dangerous to work in- I think the breakers screw down so I powered down the main and had to work by headlight...

    81. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not be in the USA. Here in the USA our standard outlets are 15 amp, 120 volts. We don't have 10 amp outlets.

      I did not notice anybody saying anything crazy like putting 10 amp outlets on a 40 amp circuit!

      What I said, and I do the work, and so does every other electrician in the USA, is that we use 15 amp outlets with 12 gauge wire on a 20 amp breakered circuit. That is Standard Operating Procedure. It is NOT unsafe! A 15 amp outlet just means the device plugging into it is only allowed to draw up to 15 amps max. The fact that the circuit can provide 20 amps means that the circuit is even better at supplying the 15 amps. There is nothing unsafe!

      The unsafe thing is people using extension cords that aren't rated for the current drawn by the device. A typical fire scenario is a space heater plugged in to a 16 or 18 gauge extension cord. That's why we have outlets every so many feet on the wall (12 feet max apart, 4 feet for kitchen counters).

      If you were to put a 20 amp outlet on a 15 amp circuit, someone might plug in a device that draws too much and trips the breaker. NEC doesn't want this condition.

      People really aren't getting this stuff...

    82. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right, it was another ammeter looped around the branch in the breaker box.... I'm just used to using the Kill-A-Watt because it is so much easier.

    83. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should have been arrested for trespassing.

    84. Re:More than theft by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      "Sir you're not welcome here, and I'll be forced to call the police if you don't leave."

      Its not hard, and it doesn't require 911.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    85. Re:More than theft by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Except that using the electricity is functionally equivalent to using the restroom these days. Everyone carries rechargable devices around with them. I frequently plug in wherever I see an outlet.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    86. Re: More than theft by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      A school near us does this ...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    87. Re:More than theft by tftp · · Score: 1

      The Sir in question was reluctant to amend his ways even when he was confronted by a cop. He'd just ignore the request of a school worker, just as he ignored earlier requests to not come.

    88. Re:More than theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I'm a BSEE-toting master electrician on World of Warcraft myself and it was hard about 31,000 cans of Red Bull hard.

    89. Re:More than theft by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Nobody has to change their behaviour because a cop told them to. The police don't happen to be right all the time. Sure, sometimes it will result in an arrest or court time, but its the judge's job to determine if you *actually* did anything wrong, not the cop's.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    90. Re:More than theft by tftp · · Score: 1

      Generally, this is true. However there are two things that play a role here. The first one is called "lawful order" - it means that a LEO is allowed to demand that people do or not do certain things, and the people are required to comply. For example, you may be instructed to drive around an accident scene. The second one is called "common sense." If a cop approaches you and tells you that your car is parked at a private property, and the owner of the property is requesting that you remove it, there is nothing really that you should be arguing about. The proper way to react here - regardless of who told you the news - is to apologize for inconvenience and leave. Outside of general human rights, you have not that many rights on someone else's private property. It's obvious that you can't park your car (even without charging!) and play tennis unless the owner is OK with that.

      If you do not want to comply with that request, yes, you can be forced to obey (by the way of being arrested.) Then the judge will review the situation. This would be a very impractical solution. By making a scene you are just adding charges. The original request could be to move your car; but the final one would be battery against a law enforcement officer. A far better method is to comply immediately, but record everything and then file a lawsuit against those who violated your rights.

    91. Re:More than theft by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if I lived next to a park, I'd run my whole house off one long power cord and stop paying the power bill. After all, it's public!

    92. Re:More than theft by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Old or corroded wiring (like you might find in a garage) may not be able to deliver 1.5kW safely for extended periods, and if a fire does start in the garage you probably won't notice it until it's become a major problem. Can you say PR nightmare?

      Meanwhile if 1kW is enough to recharge the car overnight how many people are really going to care that it was ready to go by 2am?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  27. Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Chevy only draws 120Volts / second

  28. A theft is a theft by guibaby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But there should be a certain amount of common sense when enforcing the law. First did the school complain? If the school did not complain, did the officer ask the school if there was an issue? If there was an issue, I am sure the officer or the school could have approached the man and asked him to stop using their plug. They could even post a sign saying "please do not use our plugs to charge your devices." All of this would have been cheaper, more effective and infinitely less hostile than arresting the guy.

    --
    Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels.
    1. Re:A theft is a theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why not read the article which would anwser your questions.

      The school did not complain. The officer and his idiot Sargent 11 days after the fact determined the school did not give permission, but did not wish to press charges, the officers then went to the guys home and arrested him. Yeah.. the correct way to handle this would have just been to ask the guy to stop the charging and remind\advise him what he was doing, if without permission, might be considered theft. Not in Chamblee though, if you've ever had interaction with the Chamblee police department none of this would surprise you, they are overstaffed and relatively useless, and this is just another case that highlights it. This will never see a courtroom and these idiots wills just keep on trucking along.

           

    2. Re:A theft is a theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to know how much money was spent arresting and prosecuting this man. And then he should countersue the police, the city, the DA's office and whoever else, for wasting his taxes frivolously.

    3. Re:A theft is a theft by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      First did the school complain? If the school did not complain, did the officer ask the school if there was an issue?

      A public school doesn't need to complain. An officer caught the guy using electricity from an outlet on public property without permission (a.k.a. theft). A police officer acts on behalf of the public. The article stated the officer checked with the school system prior to making the arrest. The guy was picked up 11 days after the incident.

      If there was an issue, I am sure the officer or the school could have approached the man and asked him to stop using their plug.

      From article 1 of 2 above:

      Kamooneh had taken the liberty of charging the electric car with an exterior outlet at the school. Within minutes of plugging in the car, he says a Chamblee police officer appeared.

      "He said that he was going to charge me with theft by taking because I was taking power, electricity from the school," Kamooneh said.

      From article 2 of 2 above:

      Kaveh Kamooneh plugged an extension cable from his Nissan Leaf into a 110-volt external outlet at Chamblee Middle School while his son was practicing tennis. A short time later, he noticed someone in his car and went to investigate—and found that the man was a Chamblee police officer. "He informed me he was about to arrest me, or at least charge me, for electrical theft," Kamooneh told Atlanta's Channel 11 News.

      I noticed that the events leading up to the arrest are different in the two stories. The first one states that he was approached shortly after plugging it in and the second one states that he caught the officer searching his car. Which one is accurate? Both stories quote Kaveh Kamooneh.

      There is a third possible scenario that the officer asked the guy to unplug the cord, the guy acted like an ass and the officer waited to confirm with the school board that the guy didn't have permission to use the outlet prior to making the arrest. You never see anyone admitting that they did something wrong to the reporters.

      They could even post a sign saying "please do not use our plugs to charge your devices." .

      So you believe that unless you are specifically told to not do something you are free to do as you want?

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    4. Re:A theft is a theft by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      did the school complain?

      Someone called the police. The officer was responding to a call, not walking by.

      If there was an issue, I am sure the officer or the school could have approached the man and asked him to stop using their plug

      The school had previously asked him not to charge his Leaf there. More than once. No sign necessary when you tell someone to their face.

      Woe is me, when I continually do something that people have asked me not to do, and is illegal, there are consequences.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:A theft is a theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The course of action was absurd. The reason there is no sign is because it's not worth posting a sign. At the same time it makes no sense to prosecute this case. Unfortunately we have a lot of ass holes in this country (people posting here agreeing with the cop are evidence of that). The idea that you should prosecute somebody for committing a non-issue 'theft' is ridicules. There is no clear rule that one can't charge ones personal device in a public building (even if its closed off to the public, generally, such as a school might be) or use a public restroom's water to wash ones hands. The law should assume one is not committing a crime unless there is some clear indication that one shouldn't be doing something; ie if it's against ones wishes (the schools) to use water from a publicly accessible spout, use ones publicly accessible tennis courts, use ones publicly accessible power outlet, ones publicly accessible and open access point, etc. then there should be notification in clear view. Just like you see “no trespassing” signs there should be signs for services that one might reasonably expect are public. The fact they aren't public is up to the company/organization/school/etc to put notice of.

      Anything short of this and you give police an opportunity to be ass holes and the system to abuse the power they were entrusted. I would go even further and limit the law such that if 95% of the population isn't aware no crime has been committed. Or in the case of something specific that sub-group. Ie you can't let off a water company from delivering polluted water because 95% of the rest of the population isn't aware that there is a law the prohibits water companies from delivery polluted water. However 95% of the workers for a water company would know such a thing.

    6. Re:A theft is a theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I am sure the officer or the school could have approached the man and asked him to stop using their plug. "

      Read the linked articles. They don't think asking him to stop would work, since they already asked him to stop using the tennis courts without permission, and he ignored that too. He's lucky they didn't charge him with wilful trespass.

    7. Re:A theft is a theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there should be a certain amount of common sense when enforcing the law.

      Or more precisely, the right to expect common sense when enforcing the law is a fundamental right "retained by the people" under the 9th Amendment, and "reserved to the people" under the 10th.

      One can also assert a right "retained by the people" that the government has no authority to make an arrest in any situation when a reasonable alternative course of action exists, where reasonable is defined by the people, not by the government, and certainly not by the legal profession.

      James Madison gave the USA an open-ended Bill of Rights for very good reasons. All legal professionals, and everyone else swearing an oath to uphold the law, such as police officers, and required to respect this.

      In short, the officers involved in this matter violated their oaths to uphold the law by violating fundamental rights arising under the Bill of Rights. Such oaths being preconditions for holding any position of public trust or responsibility, they are now former police officers. From the moment they violated their oaths, they should be considered private citizen impersonating police officers, and treated accordingly.

      By definition, right retained by the people being retained by the people, no entity of government may take away such rights, for if they did, they would no longer by retained. Proof by contradiction, QED.

    8. Re:A theft is a theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The officer did tell him to stop charging his vehicle with a verbal warning and the guy became belligerent with the officer. So even then the officer chose not to arrest the man and instead wrote an incident report which when it was investigated it turns out he did not have permission to be on the school grounds. At this time is when they chose to arrest the guy. He was told by the school that he was no longer allowed on school property for a previous incident of being belligerent to a school official.

  29. Historical Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a traditonal car owners point of view, seeing an electric car absorb a half hour's worth of 'refueling' is like themselves filling their gas tank for a half hour. ZOMG abuse! This is why the observers freaked out. They just don't have any perspective of trickle-charge.

  30. Don't expect the cop to know how much was stolen by mc6809e · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay. So WE all know it was just $0.05 after the fact, but put yourself in the place of the cop. Someone has a 1+ ton electrical machine plugged into an outlet. Just how much energy is being taken? Without knowing the power, the cop has no idea.

    To the cop or average person, the electrical cord is analogous to a siphon.

    Anyone caught siphoning gas from a government car into their own car is going to be arrested. This looks like the same thing to the cop.

  31. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Leaf draws 1KW/hour while charging..."

    The kW unit is already a unit of power (energy/time), so kW-per-hour doesn't make sense. Perhaps the Leaf draws 1kW while charging, so over one hour that is 1kWh of electricity which does cost in the order of 10 cents.

    1. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well kW per hour would be a rate of change in power -- so 1kW/h would describe a sort of "accelerating" energy output. I suppose this sort of unit would make sense when describing the inrush current when the car is first connected, or when describing a resulting thermonuclear explosion.

    2. Re:Correction by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Maybe the power draw ramps up over time? Rate of change of power can be measured in kW/h.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  32. Water is not free by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

    Beware of water faucets too. Why were the electrical outlets not secured. It is tempting to use. In most places where homeowners have swimming pools, they are required to have gate around pool and warning signs. Lack of warning signs at electrical outlet (warning about prosecution - like shoplifter signs) and no physical security is asking for trouble. Good thing no one was hurt.

    1. Re:Water is not free by ledow · · Score: 1

      Do you have a warning sign on your external electrical sockets at home (e.g. in the garden?)

      Do you have a warning sign on your garden sprinklers?

      Do you have a warning sign on the bulb in your porch?

      No. It's not yours, don't take it. Ask first, and 99.9% of the time if it's reasonable it'll be a Yes. And if it's ever a No, then you really DON'T want to have been doing it to that person's house anyway as they'd probably have you arrested if you were caught no matter what (i.e. they said No for a reason, or they said No because they never want you to do that and they'd kick up a fuss if they ever found our you did).

      I put a padlock on things FOR ME. To stop deliberate theft that would inconvenience me. Just because something doesn't have a sign or a lock does NOT mean you can just walk up and use/take it (take, for example, someone putting a "Help Yourself" sign on my car, and then someone takes it - that's still theft!)

      And no matter what the case, if you just asked first, it wouldn't have been a problem.

    2. Re:Water is not free by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

      I like your rhetorical questions and strong opinion on the matter. "Do you have a warning sign on your external electrical sockets at home (e.g. in the garden?)" "Do you have a warning sign on your garden sprinklers?" "Do you have a warning sign on the bulb in your porch?""

  33. Re:WRONG UNITS IDIOT (Pedants' corner now open) by DrNoNo · · Score: 2

    1] 1kWatt hour/ hour is 1kWatt, of course.

    2] It is a kWatt, abbreviated kW, not a Killowatt or Kw. The unit Watt is named after a person and all units named after people have an initial capital - and the abbreviation is also a capital. Multipliers of 10^6 or greater are capitalised. multipliers of 10^-3 or less are lower case. 'k' and 'kilo' for 10^3 is the odd one out, being lower case.

    If anyone chooses to criticise the placing of the apostrophe in "Pedant's", bear in mind that if you post here, you will make the apostrophe correctly placed.

  34. 1KW/hour? by jcbarlow · · Score: 1

    1KW/hour makes no sense. The Watt is a unit of power; that is energy transfer per unit time. The "/hour" is just silly and shows the writer's ignorance.

    1. Re:1KW/hour? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      It turns it back into Joules and thus is a measure of actual energy used. I would point out that here in the U.K. electricity is sold by the kW/hour, that being one unit.

    2. Re:1KW/hour? by HuntingHades · · Score: 2

      What the writer most certainly meant to use is - kWh or kilowatt-hour. The wikipedia entry on the kilowatt-hour even includes separate sections on both the confusion between kilowatt-hours (energy) and kilowatts (power) as well as the misuse of "watts per hour".

      1 Kilowatts/Hour, can make sense, but not in this context. It could be used to describe the change in power of a system. For example, if a generator reaches its maximum power output of 5 kW from 0 kW in 10 minutes, then it has a ramp-up rate of 30 kW/h

    3. Re:1KW/hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Energy as sold as kWhr ( 1 kW multiplied by 3,600 sec = 3.6MJ. ). Whereas kW/hour is kilowatts *per* hour, and that makes no sense.

    4. Re:1KW/hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means every hour the car draws one Kelvin-Watt.

    5. Re:1KW/hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.
      1 kWh = 3.6 MJ
      kW/h on the other hand is something nonsensical.
      Note also that kWh doesn't fit in the sentence. Looking at it, it's almost certain that the writer is quoting someone else who said kW.
      But since the writer didn't understand any of it, except possibly for the under a nickel bit, the writer screwed it up.

    6. Re:1KW/hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is sold by kWh (kW*h) NOT kW/h.

    7. Re:1KW/hour? by righteousness · · Score: 1
      No. What the writer wrote was

      The Leaf draws 1KW/hour while charging which works out to under $0.10 of electricity per hour

      He's obviously talking about the charging rate and translating it to price of electricity per hour. He's not talking about the actual energy used.

      The writer obviously meant to write 1 kW. However, even this figure is not accurate. Some googling brought me here, which states the Nissan LEAF charging rate to be 6.6 kW.

      --
      Don't fornicate. Seriously, just don't do it.
    8. Re:1KW/hour? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      No you fucktard. It's sold by the kWh. No division. You divide energy by time to get power, its rate of change. You multiply power by time to get energy, its summation.

  35. Electric chair! by linear+a · · Score: 1

    Give him the chair!

    1. Re:Electric chair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. But only use 5 cents worth of electricity for said chair.

      The punishment has to fit the crime.

  36. If the cop were serious about the arrest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the cop were serious about the arrest he would also have been charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest.

    1. Re:If the cop were serious about the arrest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The School Wanted Him Arrested!

  37. 11 days later with super over kill by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    This seems like overkill and that is having the cop come to your door (much less the jail part) when a letter / ticket works better.

  38. Re:Theft? by Jaywalk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what was the outlet there for? If it's on a public building but not meant for public use, it should have been secured, either by locking it or having it shut off inside the building. Actually, the drinking fountain comment is a good point. Obviously, a drinking fountain is there for public use. But what if it's just a faucet? Is getting a drink from a drinking fountain okay, but not a faucet? Is charging a phone okay, but not a car? Where is the line here?

    Other than the obviously boneheaded ignorance highlighted by the amounts involved, there needs to be more clarity on which public facilities are available to the public and which are reserved for the institution.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  39. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    So it's OK for the cop to not have some understanding of the crime he is charging someone with?

  40. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by janeuner · · Score: 2

    The judgement of the responding officer was to file a report. Sensible enough. The arrest happened a week later.

    RTFA. This opinion is not applicable.

  41. what about people who plug in phones / laptops? Wi by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what about people who plug in phones / laptops? Will we start hulling them off to jail as well? What about homeless people who may do this just to get into jail?

    Also what about at the airport lot's of people plug in there and lot's of airports are city / local government owned will they track you down and use extradition to have you come back? put out an warrant?

  42. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by fsck101 · · Score: 1

    Okay. So WE all know it was just $0.05 after the fact.

    No, no we don't know that. That's what the thief claims. The officer said he had no idea how long the car had been charging.

  43. So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by EvilSS · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What about if someone trespasses in my business or residence while the heat is on? Can I get them charged with theft for taking the thermal energy from the air that I paid to put there (along with trespassing charges/etc)? Or adding their body heat and thus incrementally increasing my cooling costs in the summer? What if they use a solar charger in my (let's say windowless for the sake of argument) building while the lights are on? Can I have them charged for stealing my photons?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great so ur cool with ur neighbours plugging in to your outside sockets for all their heating/cooling/lighting/cooking/server needs. ur nice.

    2. Re:So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the methane gas that I produce

    3. Re:So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      No, I want to find every possible reason to have anyone around me arrested. The more of you in prison, the more resources on the outside for me.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not really, because the more people in prison, the greater the drain on those resources by inefficient government and the prison system. You're not eliminating the competition, only changing the side he's on.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I want to find every possible reason to have anyone around me arrested. The more of you in prison, the more resources on the outside for me.

      Um, that's not exactly how it works.

      The more of you in prison, the more resources are tied up keeping you there

      oh you were being sarcastic. yay.

    6. Re:So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Not if I own the private prisions

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    7. Re:So does this apply to all energy "theft"? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      That's reckless emission of a pollutant in my house. You get arrested and go to jail for a night. Or you can buy carbon credits from me. Then it's ok.

  44. depends on how you classify it by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    In AZ theft of service is a felony regardless of cost. Jump out of a taxi without paying your $2.50 fare and it's still a felony.
    So... is electric a service or a product?
    Since you can't possess or store it I think the law considers it a service (You start and stop your electric service). If GA, like AZ, considers theft of service a felony then the arrest makes perfect sense.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    1. Re:depends on how you classify it by syzler · · Score: 1

      So... is electric a service or a product? Since you can't possess or store it I think the law considers it a service (You start and stop your electric service).

      If you cannot store electricity, then what is a battery or capacitor and why did the man plug his car into the school's outlet? If I have physical possession of a fully charged battery, how am I not in possession of the electrical charge stored within the battery?

      I believe the service part of "electric service" is the service of delivering electricity to your home. If I have water service from a local water delivery company, the service is for the delivery of the service and I pay the delivery company based upon how much water I requested.

    2. Re:depends on how you classify it by tftp · · Score: 1

      So... is electric a service or a product?

      Those are different items on your electric bill, and they are priced separately.

    3. Re:depends on how you classify it by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Forgive me, I was simplistic with my language. You can not store AC mains power for later use. You can convert mains power to DC then to chemical energy and store that in a battery (with resultant efficiency losses) then convert that chemical energy back to DC then invert back to AC to motivate your vehicle (with resistant efficiency losses).

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    4. Re:depends on how you classify it by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Fine, electricity is a product and there is a delivery service that provides the product. How does that negate my underlying argument that the man stole a service? He wasn't paying for the electric product nor its delivery service.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    5. Re:depends on how you classify it by tftp · · Score: 1

      How does that negate my underlying argument that the man stole a service?

      It doesn't. I only replied to the quoted part of your comment. I agree with the rest.

  45. why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First "The Leaf draws 1KW/hour"

    It is either 1kW or 1kWh/h

    second, if you think this is bad, can people just plug into your outlets and help themselves? If not why should they be allowed to at a school?

    1. Re:why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because my outlets are not in public places.

  46. a Leaf takes about 1.5kW by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    12A/110V.

    Not 1kW.

    I don't know about arrested, but this kind of situation has to be controlled. It's super easy to blow a circuit breaker charging an EV off a 110V outlet. And some outlets where the wires aren't connected well will heat up and that can be a problem.

    Let's see more EVSEs installed and then we won't have to worry about this issue. And maybe we can charge a little quicker too.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:a Leaf takes about 1.5kW by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      "Blow" a circuit breaker? No see the thing about circuit breakers is they're not like fuses which you used to have to replace. They trip before any of the cables heat up too much (assuming your building is wired to code). If Mr. EV tripped the breaker then there would no longer be any electricity available for him - he'd unplug and call it a day. As for the "problem" it consists of flicking a switch. This is probably less that 5 cents worth of effort on the part of some maintenance guy.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:a Leaf takes about 1.5kW by Spoke · · Score: 1

      12A/110V.

      Not 1kW.

      If you want to be pedantic, your typical outlet will supply 120V.

      Not 110V.

      If a 15-20A outlet can't handle 12A current - then it's defective and should be repaired. You're generally only going to trip the breaker if something else is also plugged in to the same circuit and is drawing a significant amount of current.

      Definitely, more EVSEs should be installed.

    3. Re:a Leaf takes about 1.5kW by tftp · · Score: 1

      If Mr. EV tripped the breaker then there would no longer be any electricity available for him - he'd unplug and call it a day.

      There are far more outlets than breakers. Several outlets are often combined into one circuit, and that circuit is then protected with a 15A breaker. It is expected that the property owner will be aware of that limitation, and will not load every outlet to the max. However in this case the EV owner had no clue (nor wanted to have one) that inside the school there could be a space heater plugged into the same circuit, consuming almost all the allowed current because the property owner did not expect any additional load to show up.

      It is not 5 cents to restore the power because the first thing you have to do is to understand why the breaker failed. This means you have to identify all the outlets on the circuit, and then you need to walk by them and check that nothing unusual is plugged into them. You unplug everything, then you push the breaker back into the ON position and observe. Then you need to think. If you only had one load plugged in, you must suspect that load. If you had several, this makes things easier. But in any case, finding a maintenance guy on Saturday would not be a 5 cent exercise. If you have to summon him it will easily cost you $100-200 in overtime.

  47. Re:WRONG UNITS IDIOT (Pedants' corner now open) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > 'k' and 'kilo' for 10^3 is the odd one out, being lower case.

    It might not be a standard prefix, but 'h'/'hecto' for 10^2 is lowercase as well.
    And 'deka' (10) seems to be to be lowercase as well, but two letters: 'da'

  48. Power to the People! by schlachter · · Score: 1

    For free!

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  49. Re: filled 17 gallon jugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using the non-residentical water costs listed for Augusta, Georgia here: http://www.augustaga.gov/index.aspx?NID=775 (150 miles from Chamblee, GA)

    Five cents would be equivalent to him having filled up 17 one-gallon jugs of water.

  50. In Canada, user of parking lots are empowered. by Al+Dunsmuir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In colder parts of Canada, there are outlets provided in parking lots so that drivers can plug in their electric battery/block heaters.f - It kind of ruins your day to not be able to start your car because the oil has gotten too thick. I would not be surprised if the same faculties are available in Western US states and Minnesota. My thoughts on seeing the title was that good-ol' quote from Cool Hand Luke. - Whut we have heah is a failure to communicate.

    1. Re:In Canada, user of parking lots are empowered. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The power plugs in the parking lot are clearly an invitation to use the power. I'm not sure how much a block heater compares to the slow charge on a leaf, but just keeping the battery warm has some valued, I think. However, running an extention cord is something completely different.

  51. Re:Theft? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 0

    It was installed on the outside of the building for the same reason you have electrical outlets on the outside of your house.

  52. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

    So it's OK for the cop to not have some understanding of the crime he is charging someone with?

    No, he understands the crime he just does not know how serious it is. A reasonable DA, unless there is some other factors not mentioned, would drop the charges.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  53. The law is vague by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

    At least the current law in California. Most of section 498 deals with diverting from "utilities" though it may be considered "personal property" and fall under another theft section.

    I remember a couple decades back the University Police in Berkeley were beset by complaints about loud late-night music constantly blairing from a boom-box operated by a homeless guy in one of the parking structures. "Disturbing the peace" is a tough sell and he didn't ever get the clue till they started arresting him for stealing electricty from the university since he was plugged into an outlet there.

    I've always thought back to that case and wondered if I'm at risk when I charge my laptop from a wall outlet at an airport or coffee shop.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:The law is vague by CryptDemon · · Score: 1

      Considering most airports have desks and areas to use your laptop and charge it, I don't think you're in any trouble.

    2. Re:The law is vague by tftp · · Score: 1

      Airports and coffee shops are in business of providing services to travelers and paying customers. This is quite different from a public school - a school is not expected to provide any services whatsoever to anyone but students and staff.

  54. Do they arrest people for using block heaters too? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    [nt]

  55. In jail for a small theft ? by andreasmor · · Score: 0

    Now I understand why the USA has the highest incarceration rate in the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_incarceration_rate What is the benefit for the community if they put in jail everyone for a small theft ? O sorry, I forgot. He is a lucky guy, because the officer did not shoot him

    1. Re:In jail for a small theft ? by koan · · Score: 1

      We have the highest incarceration rate because it's profitable, and for no other reason.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  56. Re:Georgia, where cars ride with confederate flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not in Chamblee it wouldn't.

    We used to call it Chambodia, but now parts of it are Chambexico.

  57. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't hyperbolise.

    Did the cop know or reasonably suspect that a theft was being committed? Yes.

    Is he required to know exactly the local electricity rates, the rate of the consumption of the car, the time it was plugged it down to the nearest second, the cable losses, and the discount that the school gets on electricity supply before he can make an arrest? No.

    And if you read the article, he didn't - he made a report, the arrest came when the facts came to light.

    If a kid runs out of a shop chased by security with an armful of things, the cop doesn't need to itemise what he has and whether it reaches a certain figure. You arrest, then you investigate, which is the purpose of the arrest, and then if necessary you "escalate" the arrest to a formal charge.

    Being arrested means NOTHING except detaining you on reasonable suspicion of a crime until it can be ascertained whether a crime has been committed or not.

    Fact is, he didn't arrest him, that came later when they checked facts. And he can arrest him because he has more than a reasonable suspicion that he took something (a product or service) that didn't belong to him, without permission, and with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of it. MORE THAN reasonable. In that he could see him doing it first-hand and query him about it and get an admission ("Yeah, but it's only 5c!" is basically an admission that you did it if you have anywhere near a half-decent lawyer on the other side).

    What part of this confuses you? He was arrested, after much consultation, for a crime he admits doing, that a policeman caught him doing, which the school did not give permission for him to do, petty though it is.

    You know what? I bet if he'd asked the school and even said "Here's ten cents for the school charity, can I just plug in my car outside for a minute so I can get home?" they'd have told the police that it was authorised and there'd be no issue.

  58. His taxes paid for the electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is everyone forgetting that a school is a public institution, he already paid for the electricity with his taxes. They don't charge for drinking out of the water fountain, in fact they installed a fountain so people could take water. The same argument applies to the electrical receptacle the school intentionally installed outside, and the school is liable for defamation at this point.

    1. Re:His taxes paid for the electricity by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      His taxes also already paid for all the computer equipment in the school, so perhaps he should've walked right out with that, too. Or at least made off with all the playground equipment, since it was "intentionally installed outside".

      You have an odd understanding of "public property".

    2. Re:His taxes paid for the electricity by g01d4 · · Score: 1

      Public institution doesn't mean its resources are available to the general public for use as they see fit. His taxes are spent there to educate students. Slaking your thirst is not the same as slaking the thirst of your lawn, car or other personal property. That being said, the arrest was a waste of resources and a simple warning was in order.

    3. Re:His taxes paid for the electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point stands. You're using the light from electric lamps to see, or drinking water from the fountain, or maybe you're charging your cell phone. What's reasonable here? "Theft is theft?" How about picking a flower for your sweetheart that was growing out front. Or if you take a piss, you're "using" the sewer. What if you ask the janitor for the time of day and he stops mopping to look at his watch. How about if you drive a county vehicle on county business and stop in the parking lot letting the engine idle while you pick your nose? How about used toilet paper - what if you took that?

      Seriously, he has no odd understanding, you're the one that needs to get a grip. This is obviously a grey area with no established norms, and it's unreasonable for law enforcement to proceed with an arrest.

  59. kW/hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The unit kW/hour makes no sense in this context. Maybe the car draws 1 kW, and maybe the cost of electricity is $.10/(kW hour)--that's kW TIMES hour.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt_hour

  60. Re:Do they arrest people for using block heaters t by Al+Dunsmuir · · Score: 1

    I claim first post on this one 8^)

  61. Lots of issues by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    While I think this was taken to an extreme there are some issues to be addressed. Mainly, while as a singularity it's not a lot of power I'm going to guess that there could be an issue if every external outlet was plugged into by people charging their cars all at once. The second is a general safety concern. You now have extensions cords running to cars causing hazards. Most places require external cords to either be taped or held down to make them less a tripping issue, was this done? Presumably school was out, but you also have people charging at a middle school where there could be hundreds of kids of the age to get themselves in trouble. None of these warrent and arrest, but they are issues that need to be addressed.

  62. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

    He's not charging. He's arresting, with reasonable evidence that a crime has been committed. The prosecutor would be the one pressing charges, or not if they don't think the case is worthwhile.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  63. Laugh by koan · · Score: 1

    America doesn't operate on common sense or rational context driven thinking any more, there are rules and that's it, no one is encouraged to evaluate the intent of said law in context, no one is encouraged to think.

    In fact minimum sentencing requirements force judges to sentence harshly against their better judgement, and the judges are complaining about it
    You might as well just have a computer handing out sentences for all the good it does to have a human judge.

    They simply have no choice but to comply, and this is the worst sort of environment to live, no reasoning with anyone, no mercy, no common sense, just "you broke the law".

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  64. Inexcusable by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 2

    I would award treble damages.

    1. Re:Inexcusable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but why involve cops for something so trivial? The school should simply bill him for use of electricity. The amount would be so small (even tripled) that he'll have no problem paying.

    2. Re:Inexcusable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would award bass damages.

  65. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    He has some understanding, someone was stealing power from the school. He doesn't need to know how much.

    Imagine if everytime you went to the store, you took a nickel out of the till. Now imagine everyone doing the same thing. No one person is "stealing that much" but in aggregate, they are stealing the store into bankruptcy.

    In short, STEALING is a crime, because it wrong, no matter how little you "steal".

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  66. Bigot Belt by nitehawk214 · · Score: 0

    Cops in Georgia probably have standing orders to arrest anyone driving an electric vehicle since they are probably democrats.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Bigot Belt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cops in Georgia probably have standing orders to arrest anyone driving an electric vehicle since they are probably democrats.

      I know you're trying to be clever, and picking on republicans is fun, but racists in the south have a long history of being democrats.

      If you want to pick on the republicans, at least pick on them for something that is true - there is no shortage of those.

  67. Re:WRONG UNITS IDIOT (Pedants' corner now open) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    your runing teh intarnet

  68. So basically... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    I RTA and come to find out the school played a part in this as well. Apparently the school told the cops he didn't have permission to plug in his car and agreed to press charges when asked by the cop.

    Long story short: Both the school and the cops are going to be spending money on PR damage control that far exceeds any costs the EV owner could have milked out of their power grid.

    If this happened to me, I'd pull my kid out of the school and either move or put him in another school.

    1. Re:So basically... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If this happened to me, I'd pull my kid out of the school and either move or put him in another school.

      His kid doesn't go to that school. He was playing tennis on the school's courts himself. They asked him to stop charging (not just didn't have permission), in part because it interfered with them using the tennis courts. He was asked to stop and didn't.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  69. Malicious compliance by alispguru · · Score: 1

    seems to be the most generic statement of it. From Wikipedia.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  70. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by cbeaudry · · Score: 2

    The office made a report and charged him 11 days later.

    I think he had ample time to determine what the current draw was in his "investigation".

    Also, if the guy was there 20 mins or 4 hours, it still doesn't amount to 1$.

    His son goes to soccer practice there, I have a very hard time imagining that the school asked to press charges.
    And if the school did, I wonder who is more evil in this case, the officer or the school.

  71. First a nickel... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 3, Funny

    then a dime. Pretty soon you're talking about real money!!!

    1. Re:First a nickel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like a bitcoin?

  72. Message by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, over thousands of people and many years the overall theft adds up to a lot if left unchecked. So perhaps a correctly proportionate response to deter all future theft is exactly what happened, punish one guy a bit harshly while telling everyone else this is wrong.

    I don't know what is is but much of Slashdot seems morally challenged today.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Message by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 2

      People die every day because another driver is going unsafe speeds on the road, but despite what all those deaths add up to it's only in the most extreme cases of reckless driving is anything more then a ticket given.

      I agree with the sentiment that this is a behavior is one that should be curbed for countless good reasons. This though is clearly a case where an arrest is completely inappropriate. A citation would likely have stopped the offender with a net gain for law enforcement rather then the cost of an arrest and the fighting and bad publicity that this is going to lead to.

      Stopping the unwanted activity at a net gain to the tax payer seems like a much better deal to me.

    2. Re:Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >On the other hand, over thousands of people and many years the overall theft adds up to a lot if left unchecked. So perhaps a correctly proportionate response to deter all future theft is exactly what happened, punish one guy a bit harshly while telling everyone else this is wrong.

      If this is a common issue at the school, the article sure didn't mention it. It would make a huge difference to the debate, so the lack of discussion on the topic indicates to me this is the first time this has ever occurred at this location.

      If the offense were common, I expect signs would be placed near the outlets stating what not to use them for, and the punishment if you don't follow the rules. The article would then mention how the person abusing electricity purposely ignored the signs. And then the article would have never made it to slashdot because it would be too stupid for words.

    3. Re:Message by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, over thousands of people and many years the overall theft adds up to...

      A tipping point adoption of the electric car

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    4. Re:Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1001 people (over a thousand) means a loss of $50.05 over the many years timeframe you listed. Pretty insignificant.

    5. Re:Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not the job of the police to make examples of people. That is up to judges who make judgements, not thugs with guns and badges.
      From your last sweeping comment you have no problem with making judgements over everyone based on a few comments.
      This isn't about morals, this is about the legal system knee jerking, and you are somehow fine with the knee jerk! You may remain upon your lofty judgement cloud until the knee jerks in your direction, then you might change your incredibly narrow point of view.

    6. Re:Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, over thousands of people and many years the overall theft adds up to a lot if left unchecked.

      Over thousands of people and many years, the cost of checking each one also adds up.

      We assume that a drinking fountain that is located on a publicly accessible portion of a government building or private business is available for public use, free of charge. Perhaps the best answer is to assume that electrical outlets in a place of public accommodation are also free of charge, and the onus is upon the owner to limit its output or put up a notice that it is not for public use.

    7. Re:Message by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      If it was a significant problem they'd have put a padlock on the outdoor socket already. Or switched it off at the circuit breaker inside.

    8. Re:Message by sjames · · Score: 1

      I would argue that your position is the morally challenged position. You are advocating a punishment way beyond the 'crime'. You are also arguing in favor of petty and vindictive behavior from civil servants.,/p>

    9. Re:Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because while making 'an example' out of someone might in theory deter some, it does not balance the scales of justice required in a free society where 'the punishment should fit the crime'

      If you want to live in a world like that, go live in a third world Asian nation where the civic standard is 'the nail that sticks up gets hammered down'.

      The rest of us kind of like the idea of justice and equal application of the law.

    10. Re:Message by tftp · · Score: 1

      If it was a significant problem they'd have put a padlock on the outdoor socket already. Or switched it off at the circuit breaker inside.

      It wasn't a problem just a year ago because nobody would need that outlet. Now more and more outdoor outlets are locked, and lockable covers are available at Home Depot.

    11. Re:Message by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Is citation an option, though? It is spelled out in the law for traffic violations, but is there any provision for anything like that in the law for other areas?

      Maybe there should be. Maybe this case should shine the light on the need.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:Message by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, over thousands of people and many years the overall theft adds up to a lot if left unchecked.

      Again, that's ridiculous. You shouldn't punish someone severely to make an example out of them; the punishment should fit the crime. The end.

      This is not an attitude I'd expect from the "land of the free and the home of the brave."

    13. Re:Message by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Case law sits at odds with that.

      There's also the concept of risk vs reward. If the risk for committing a grave offense is too low, then the penalty when caught usually rises. So long as it doesn't become cruel and unusual the constitution doesn't have a problem with it.

      As for this, who really cares about 5 cents? Sure the cop can issue a ticket if it is against the law, but you also need to find a prosecutor willing to prosecute it, and assuming can find that, then find a judge who won't throw it out when presented with the reasonable person standard, i.e. a reasonable person wouldn't assume there to be a crime in plugging in anything for a brief period of time.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    14. Re:Message by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Case law sits at odds with that.

      I don't care what case law sits at odds with.

      If the risk for committing a grave offense is too low, then the penalty when caught usually rises.

      As I said, justice > security, just like freedom > security. I'm opposed to the TSA, just as I'm opposed to this garbage of punishing someone more severely merely because it's difficult to catch people who do that crime.

    15. Re:Message by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Lockable outdoor outlets have been available for decades.

  73. Do we need sings on each outlet in a public place? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Do we need sings on each outlet in a public place? Now when you have cops with the 'theft is a theft" mind set maybe we need to go to the extreme? even more so when jail and courts are part of it? what even happened to you can't plug in hear being the end of it?

    Didn't airports used to make a big deal but never jail or stuff like this?

  74. Will be convicted of a felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He will be convicted felony because the private prisons in GA need more workers.

    The justification on record will be that they don't want the residents of Chamblee to subsidize electric car usage.

    In addition the residents of Chamblee want the negative publicity because that drives down their property values reducing their tax burden.

  75. Taxpayers Pay For and Own The School by ilikenwf · · Score: 0

    Therefore, he has every right to charge there. His tax dollars pay for the place, not to mention the boneheaded cop.

    1. Re:Taxpayers Pay For and Own The School by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So if I live next to a school, I can just run an extension cord over to my house and not have to pay for electricity ever again? AWESOME!

      No, your tax dollars pay for the school to provide education services, not electricity services. Paying for one thing and taking something else as well is theft.

    2. Re:Taxpayers Pay For and Own The School by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Does that mean we've got the right to use the classrooms whenever we feel like it, too?

      Need some supplies for your meth lab? Just take what you need from chemistry class, as long as you pay your taxes.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Taxpayers Pay For and Own The School by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      You need to learn a little bit about government funding and ownership. The taxpayer does NOT own things that are purchased with taxpayer money.

    4. Re:Taxpayers Pay For and Own The School by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Cool. Why should I buy a car? The military base near me has tanks. Sure they get shitty MPG, but they also have vast reserves of diesel for me to fill up at.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Taxpayers Pay For and Own The School by ilikenwf · · Score: 1

      To haters over this comment, you should understand there are reasonable and unreasonable expectations of service here. Water fountains, toilets, toilet paper, soap, paper towels, hand dryers, etc are public useable in schools so long as the person using them has a legitimate reason to be at the school. They won't yell if you plug in your phone where I'm from, I doubt they'd care about a car.

      Don't bring private property such as your/my house into this debate - it doesn't belong here, as a school is PUBLIC PROPERTY. Different rules apply.

      Stealing a school bus or breaking into the school to hold your own function without permission/paying for the space rental is one thing, but using the utilities there when you're there for whatever legitimate reason is fine.

      I see people use the playgrounds all the time during the off hours - should we arrest them for depreciating and breaking down public property? This police state crap is awful.

  76. Re:No by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    Q: Is this fellow related to the guy who DDoS'd the Koch brothers for 60 seconds?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  77. Re:Theft? by c_jonescc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed. The line is not well defined, and it is ludicrous that with those ambiguities (why exactly is his car different from a phone, or a laptop?) the police would go to his home at dinner time to arrest him days later.

    They intentionally arrested him at 8p. A time when it's hard to get paperwork/representation/hearing, and thus chose that he be forced to jail overnight. Jail overnight! Not for drunken driving, not for violence or endangerment, for an ill-defined "theft". Why would that be a reasonable course of action? If the police picked up someone over a week later for a night in jail for a stolen *anything* with small value, everyone would likely see agenda/corruption driving the decision.

    Would they have done that if I plugged in my laptop? My phone? Is this outlet only for maintenance's use? If so, why isn't it secured against this "theft", tampering, or adolescent darwin-award experimentation? If it's for student or community use, why is this a problem?

    Is this school private or public? What rights does he have as a student's parent vs. a student vs. anyone else? Could we expect that if one of the faculty charged their phone there, that they too would spend a night in jail?

    I suspect it's got a lot to do with politics and a regional dislike of environmentalists or liberals. I'd be very happy to learn otherwise, because the police selectively seeking punitive punishment for what materials goods you possess, and what they infer those goods mean about you is not a great direction for us to be heading.

    --
    Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
  78. I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all the speculation and wild nonsense found in the comments here on /. We know too little to form a reasonable opinion.

    Reason is lost in this country.

  79. fuck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More stories about the fucking pigs.

  80. It's not about 5 cents by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Through a fortunate coincidence, the number of hours in a year and the average cost of electricity in the U.S. ($0.12/kWh) means if a device is plugged in 24/7, the Watts it draws translates almost exactly into $ per year. Most laptops draw about 30 W while charging. A phone about 5 W. So if people were constantly using that outlet to charge their laptops and phones 24/7, the school or business would only pay $30 or $5 extra in a year. They may very well decide that's small enough they'll just pay it as a convenience to their visitors.

    1 kW to charge an EV is an entirely different matter (it's actually probably closer to 1.5 kW which is about the safe limit for most residential 110V 20A circuits; 1 kW is probably the battery's charge rate after thermal losses). Allowing your outlets to be used to to charge EVs would drive up your electric bill by hundreds of dollars a year per outlet to a max $1500. So it's perfectly reasonably for a school or business to prohibit visitors charging EVs on their dime.

    Or from the EV owner's perspective, if you can leech a 8 hours of electricity from your workplace and random stores and schools 5 days/week for a year, you'll have stolen about $350 worth of electricity by the end of the year. That's what this is about, not 5 cents. Saying it's about 5 cents is like saying a bank robber should go free because he was caught before he actually managed to steal any money.

    1. Re:It's not about 5 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying it's about 5 cents is like saying a bank robber should go free because he was caught before he actually managed to steal any money.

      What are you going to arrest this wannabe "bank robber" for then... thought crime? I've thought about robbing the bank every time I've been in one, just for shits and giggles. The dude was arrested for THIS incident, you can't charge him based on the assumption that he will become a serial offender without any evidence.

    2. Re:It's not about 5 cents by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Did they catch him stealing more than 5 cents worth of electricity? No. You can't punish him for things he merely may have done; that's ridiculous and unjust.

    3. Re:It's not about 5 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's perfectly reasonably for a school or business to prohibit visitors charging EVs on their dime.

      Sure, so put up a sign, or secure the outlets, or perhaps not put them near electric vehicles.

    4. Re:It's not about 5 cents by vandamme · · Score: 1

      They ought to put in a 1 amp breaker then. And, a sign warning moochers.

  81. I just better not catch that cop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... taking an extra napkin at the donut shop. Citizen's arrest, baby! Theft is theft; he might even have to forfeit his pension.

  82. most cops give at least 5MPH more on high speed ro by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    most cops give at least 5MPH more on high speed roads.

    also most of the interstates / tolls roads no one is doing the 55 the 85th percentile is 70-73

  83. There goes Southern hospitality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Kaveh Kamooneh plugged an extension cable from his Nissan Leaf into a 110-volt external outlet at Chamblee Middle School while his son was practicing tennis"

    This was a very bad judgement call on the cop's part, and on the part of the prosecutor or detective who formalized the charges.

    This was public property, apparently the outlet was unposted and unlocked, and there was sufficient opportunity for the school to prevent access (by posting, by switch, by locking cover, etc.)

    Unless there is separate metering on the device, any evidence of usage would have to come from the vehicle's internal metering system. That evidence was likely obtained via an illegal search.

    The State of Georgia has an incentive program for installing this kind of equipment: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/laws/laws/GA A reasonable person could easily assume that an electrical outlet located in a parking lot at a public school was intended for precisely this purpose.

    The school system could very well end up paying out for malicious prosecution, fraudulent inducement, harassment and/or discrimination, depending on the specifics.

    The cop may have have exposure for his actions: false arrest, illegal search, etc., and in any event he's now publicly known as a luddite, which will eventually affect him or his family (unless some judge orders it all erased from the Internet :-) )

    Stupid and expensive.

  84. If he'd plugged in a boom box for 30 minutes... by thepainguy · · Score: 1

    ...would it have been as big of a deal?

    1. Re:If he'd plugged in a boom box for 30 minutes... by The_Star_Child · · Score: 1

      Yes. Who the hell uses a boombox these days?

  85. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The distinction is arbitrary to begin with, the human mouth is analogous to a siphon, is drinking water from a government building a crime? Don't install regular NEMA 5-15 receptacles outside if you don't want people using them at a public place.

  86. Public property ? by oxygen_deprived · · Score: 1

    Not sure about how things work in America...But looks like this school is a public school. If this is a public school, then isnt its building and facilities public property ? Like the park and the water fountain there ? Of course there can be access and usage restrictions...but in the absence of any known restrictions, wouldnt public property be usable by all and any ?

  87. Her friend should have faxed in a wad of juice. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    There is some historical precedence for this this thing. One boss caught the employee using company electricity for personal purposes, and the employee explained that he had his friend fax in a wad of electricity. Oh, yeah, here is the citation for you.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  88. Officer did not like non-Ford cars? by Al+Dunsmuir · · Score: 1

    Ernesto Ford? Hmmmm - would he have done the same for someone driving a Chevy Volt?

  89. Re:Do we need sings on each outlet in a public pla by Al+Dunsmuir · · Score: 1

    Sings? Yessir - both Country AND Western! Ahhhhh... you mean signs!

  90. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are forgetting that EVERYONE, repeat EVERYONE in US Lew Enforcement (the key is in the word Enforcement) submist to a full frontal lobotomy where they have every vestige of Common Sense removed from their being.
    Then for evermore, even the most trivial violation of even the most stupid law is prosecuted with the full force of the law. Why else would prosecutors always asl for the maximum sentence in every crime?
    Steal 5Cents of Power? Thats 10-15 years hard labor for you. It is a crime equal to stealing $10M from an bank. A

    Boy am I glad that I never decided to stay in the US and become a Citizen when I was given the chance.

  91. Ipod owners arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone ever been arrested for charging their mp3 player?

  92. I blame Nissan by rossdee · · Score: 1

    For calling the vehicle a Leaf

    Presumably short for Tea Leaf

  93. Happened at the USA's fucked-up School District by McGruber · · Score: 5, Informative

    Chamblee Middle School (http://www.chambleems.dekalb.k12.ga.us/) is part of the Dekalb County (Georgia) School System. DCSS is the most fucked-up school district in the USA. The former Superintendent was arrested for theft by taking, the replacement Superintendent abandoned her job and the current Superintendent is a political hack who lacks the qualifications required to hold a teacher's license. The former COO was just found guilty of racketeering. The DCSS school board was removed by the state Governor and the school system is currently on "Accredited Probation", the only school system in the country with that status.

    Some recent news coverage of Dekalb County School System:

    Court upholds law used to suspend DeKalb school board members: http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local/court-upholds-law-used-to-suspend-dekalb-school-bo/nb4Cx/

    Ex-DeKalb school official found guilty of racketeering: http://www.11alive.com/news/article/313666/40/Verdict-reached-in-DeKalb-corruption-trial

    DeKalb teacher accused of beating special needs elementary student with stick: http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/dekalb-teacher-accused-beating-special-needs-eleme/nb26M/

    School superintendent negotiates settlement in expensive legal battle: http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local-education/school-superintendent-negotiates-settlement-in-exp/nb89X/

    DeKalb Schools placed on probation: http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/dekalb-schools-placed-probation/nTYSp/

    DeKalb’s graduation rate under the new state formula: 58.65% (Meaning that 42% of Dekalb Students DO NOT GRADUATE!) http://dekalbschoolwatch.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/dekalbs-graduation-rate-under-the-new-state-formula-58-65/

  94. Re:Theft? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Not locking something up is not, and has never been an excuse for theft.

    This case certainly wasn't worth pursuing. But let's not pretend it wasn't petty theft. It clearly was.

  95. I wonder... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

    Mr Kaveh Kamooneh is clearly not white, in fact appears to be of middle eastern descent, and this arrest was in Georgia after all. If the arrrest happened up here in Canada, it wouldn't even occur to me that race might be involved, particularly since the arresting officers are just as likely to be non-white themselves. But since it was indeed in Georgia, there is a small chance that race might have been involved in the decision to proceed with criminal charges.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:I wonder... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      But since it was indeed in Georgia, there is a small chance that race might have been involved in the decision to proceed with criminal charges.

      That part of Georgia is a suburb of Atlanta. It has a massive immigrant presence. I doubt race is an issue.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  96. Re:WRONG UNITS IDIOT (Pedants' corner now open) by admiralh · · Score: 1

    Hectare (as in 100 ares, an are being 100 square meters) is standard and quite common in Metric countries, and is abbreviated ha.

    The conversion is approx 2.471 acre = 1 ha

    --
    Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
  97. Re:most cops give at least 5MPH more on high speed by jythie · · Score: 1

    Well, there is what 'most cops' will do, and then there is what 'individual cops can do'.

  98. Do we need signs on each outlet in a public place? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Do we need signs on each outlet in a public place? Now when you have cops with the 'theft is a theft" mind set maybe we need to go to the extreme? even more so when jail and courts are part of it? what even happened to you can't plug in hear being the end of it?

    Didn't airports used to make a big deal but never jail or stuff like this?

  99. Re:Georgia, where cars ride with confederate flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky the car owner wasn't black otherwise he'd be shot in the back with the officer accusing him of using the car's electrical plug as a weapon.

    Insightful? Really Slashdot? I guess injecting race into every article really gives us a deep understanding on that particular issue...

  100. Re:Theft? by mythosaz · · Score: 0

    Agreed. The line is not well defined...

    It's very well defined. It wasn't his outlet, and he shouldn't siphon power from it without permission.

    I've got outlets on the exterior of my house; that's not an invitation to plug your crap in there.

    n.b. I own a Leaf. If you're driving around with your "charger," you're looking to siphon energy.

  101. Re:Theft? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

    and a smart person installs a switch and turns them off when they aren't in use.

  102. The law is the LOUW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Officer of the LLLOOUUUUUWWW is making a point. Because he's standing up for the LLLOOOUUWWWW!!! Because everything said in the LLOOUUWWW is absolute moral truth.

    Cops are self righteous morons. True morons.

  103. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [P]ut yourself in the place of the cop.

    Okay... Upon realizing what I've suddenly become — an authoritarian thug whose mental logic is based on tautologies and a juvenile division of society into "good guys" and "bad guys;" a scourge on free and civilized society; a waste of taxpayer funds in furtherance of a growing police state... A "public servant" who's primarily enforcing laws written by and for revolving-door political/corporate elites for their protection from — and exploitation of — this country's vast and growing majority-underclass of underpaid wage-slaves; spending my days jailing the poor in order to increase the private prison industry's rapidly-growing pool of slave-labor in exchange for a meager wage; but also a license to kill (and commit any other crime that doesn't threaten those in power) — I mentally brace myself for my sole act of genuine public service: I draw my service pistol, press the muzzle against the roof of my mouth, and squeeze the trigger.

    Later that week, the sound of bagpipes playing signal a tiny increase in the liberty of those who remain, until a sufficiently-low-IQ. mustachioed "particular individual" takes my place caving-in minorities' skulls, electrocuting the deaf/non-submissive, and otherwise "protecting and serving" the interests of myself, my department, and the political/corporate elites.

  104. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by sjames · · Score: 1

    1500Watts max. Meaning that to even add up to a whole dollar, he'd have to stay there overnight.

  105. School Missed An Opportunity Here by tyen · · Score: 1

    The school could have stepped in and said they have informally allowed it (thus graciously letting this guy off the hook), but now that it has become a big deal, they'll print up $30 per year tags to hang on the rear view mirror that gives parents the right to charge during school operating hours. Win for the school: they get to tap a small revenue source (but every little bit helps), and get to look progressive with parents that have the disposable income to choose EV's. Win for the parents: they get to top off during school events that they attend.

  106. PUBLIC school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, so he "stole" electricity from a public school that is funded by taxpayer money? How do you steal from yourself?

  107. Whats new? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Cops don't like Hippies. What's new here?

  108. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by jcochran · · Score: 1

    Oh, I agree that the police officer waited and had sufficient evidence that a crime was committed. However, by his arresting the person instead of simply giving a ticket, that gentleman is now entered into the NCIC database. One major problem with that database. It's not just used by the government. It's used also for background checks to see if someone has been arrested. Doesn't matter how the case is resolved in the courts. The mere existence of that little record in NCIC is going to haunt that gentleman for the rest of his life. In fact, that little datum will in many cases prevent various corporations from ever hiring him if he ever desires to take employment with them. Frankly,that officer showed extreme lack of judgement and at the very least ought to be reprimanded.

  109. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by sjames · · Score: 1

    Actually, many stores have the change cup for rounding.

    I'll bet if they had asked him for 5 cents he'd have probably given them whatever coil came to hand and told them to keep the change.

  110. Re:Theft? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    For powering the robots of Armageddon, I see then. Carry on.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  111. Re:A theft is a theft. CORRECTION by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    Kaveh Kammoneh did state that he found the officer in his car in the first article. The news article didn't include that portion in the written article even though it is in the attached video.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  112. This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

    This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos in Washington DC in 2003.

    I was sitting at a booth and plugged in my charger. The manager came over, starting asking questions about the service, and asked me why I had been there so long. He said he noticed I was stealing electricity from the restaurant and the police had been called, and would not let me get out of the booth.

    When the cops came, they took me out to the car in cuffs. They talked with the manager for about 45 minutes. I was released with the promise that I would never return to the restaurant again.

    It's strange to think how different things are today, where everyone just does this anytime they are out. But yeah, people have strange outlooks on this sometimes.

    1. Re:This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is to turn 90 degrees and launch the asshole against the counter with your legs, then leave. That manager needs to have his ass kicked for just being a general asshole.

      Unless you were a dick and did not buy anything, then you deserved to be tazed.

    2. Re:This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's strange to think how different things are today, where everyone just does this anytime they are out.

      Do they? I wouldn't, and have never noticed anyone doing it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't obtain permission to use their utilities. You took electricity without authorization, and without asking.

      Basically, you are guilty of theft, and should have been arrested. It's a shame you were not formally charged and convicted for the theft, which you have admitted to.

    4. Re:This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos by ilikenwf · · Score: 1

      Stupid jerk doesn't deserve your business.

    5. Re:This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brick their window.

    6. Re:This almost happened to me at a Pizzeria Unos by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      hmmmm, half the guys I know would never let a manager "keep them in a booth", they'd be needing a new manager after the old one's attitude was adjusted a bit

  113. Re:Theft? by Minwee · · Score: 1

    It was installed on the outside of the building for the same reason you have electrical outlets on the outside of your house.

    It was installed so that visitors leaving their cars in the parking lot could plug in their block heaters?

    I don't really see how that example is helping your case.

  114. It's a question of scale. What if everyone did it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course a Leaf uses considerably more current than a laptop or a cellphone.

  115. Should be arrested, people need to learn respect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live on a street where there is a farmers market and our front porch in only a few feet from the sidewalk. Regularly jackasses at the market would plug into our building to power their freezers. Yes it's theft, yes it's wrong, and yes it's illegal. I talked to people several times about it and they kept doing it. Eventually I called the police. I don't care if they only stole $0.10 of electricity, people need to respect the rights of others.

    I've also had people plug EV into our building. We eventually put a locking outlet cover on because of this. People feel so entitled to things that aren't theirs. Subby needs to grow up.

    They are clearly in the wrong. Just because it's a school doesn't make it okay.

  116. Re:Theft? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    Actually, we do not know that it was petty theft. It may have been, but it is possible the outlet was there for people who were legitimately on the property to charge cell-phones/laptops/other electronic devices. There are not enough details in either of the stories for us to know whether or not this was an actual crime (although it is clear that if it was a crime, it was a very minor crime).

    There are so many facts we do not know that it is hard to form a solid opinion about it. I do not have particular sympathy for the owner of the car (although if certain facts come to light, that could easily change). On the other hand, my inclination is to suspect that the police officer was abusing his authority (I can think of numerous things that might come to light to change that, although that would require more than what would be required for me to start sympathizing with the owner of the car).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  117. Re:Henchman? Looks more like another Entitlement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And this adds to the overall cost of an EV. Not just moving pollution producing activities to other communities and claiming a moral superiority but, now, the sense of entitlement--entitled to free electricity at the expense of the taxpayers and property owners. The arrogance of EV owners is astonishing!

  118. should have asked first, another idiot who feels e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think if left unchecked he might feel entitled to plug it in every day, eventually costs could add up. IRS the principal of the thing. He should have asked, in not doing so he is perceived a sense of entitlement; what's next... Basketballs from the gym, meds from the cabinet, chems from the lab.

    If you do not have the courtesy to ask, the slippery slope of theft exists.

  119. Re:Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have electrical outlets on the outside of my house because I don't want people using them.
    What now?

  120. Re:Georgia, where cars ride with confederate flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is mod'd as insightful!?!?! [shakes head and walks away]

  121. It's called slack by sjames · · Score: 1

    The whole world would be better off with a little more slack.

  122. Re:Theft? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    As the cops confirmed they'd given no permission, it was certainly petty theft.

  123. Arrest people in airports!!! by tekrat · · Score: 1

    They are all charging their phones and laptops from the provided electrical outlets!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  124. FTW by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    FTW

  125. Based on what exactly? by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 0

    I bet if the "suspect" was named "John Smith" and white he might not have been arrested.

    You say that based on what evidence?

    I'm surprised that didn't make it into the summary.

    I thank Slashdot for not click-whoring that badly (at least this time).

  126. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the cop listens to the same media bought and paid for by Kock Industries.

  127. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly what I was going to say but you said it better.

  128. Re:Theft? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    I frequent a public school on weekends to use the grounds to fly rc planes, there are several receptacles outside I could use to charge my battery packs, I do not as these are obviously intended for school use and not public use. There is a port-a-potty on premises that I use that is obviously for public use.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  129. Typical scumbag cop response by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    That Cop in the video is a scumbag and should be fired. He is a SERVANT of the people not the fricking terminator.
    His attitude is disgusting and he is the perfect example of the absolute worst type of cop out there. Zero compassion, zero respect to the OATH he took.

    Although I will bet $$$ that the asshole speeds when off duty and breaks a lot of laws. Cops dont have to obey laws.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  130. Re:Theft? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    So what was the outlet there for? If it's on a public building but not meant for public use, it should have been secured, either by locking it or having it shut off inside the building. Actually, the drinking fountain comment is a good point. Obviously, a drinking fountain is there for public use. But what if it's just a faucet? Is getting a drink from a drinking fountain okay, but not a faucet? Is charging a phone okay, but not a car? Where is the line here?

    Exactly where the company chooses to draw it, in most production companies taking one chocolate off the production line and with you home is a firing offense even if it's worth five cents. Things that are provided for work (materials, tools, services, products, whatever) are there to let everyone do their job, any other incidental use you might want it for is up to their acceptable use policy. Would a network manager accept that people connected their own devices to the internal networks to siphon off a few bytes of the Internet connection to check their mail? I very much doubt that unless you work in a BYOD workplace or have guest networks set up specifically for that purpose.

    Most employers tend to take a reasonable approach on marginal costs (browsing the Internet, private call on work phone, printing two pages or making five photocopies, charge your cell phone) because being an ass works both ways but strictly speaking they could put me in a secure compartmentalized zone and deny me bringing almost anything in and out except myself and the clothes on my back. Of course then I'd say I'm working for paranoid nuts and not Top Secret military systems and find myself a sane employer, but it'd be totally legal. But I have worked on systems that simply didn't have Internet access, go to special terminals if you need it.

    So how far could you go in the absence of any written policy, oral approval, signs or any other obvious indications? Well there's implied permission, if they offered parking spaces and those parking spaces had EV chargers on them (like one per space) I'd take permission to park to also imply permission to use the chargers. But if there just happens to be a socket in the parking lot so anyone working there could run a power tool, I'd say you don't have that. It could be things that are so commonplace that you wouldn't ask, like using the bathroom if you already have legitimate business in the building. Charging your car isn't that though.

    I think they're technically correct, though I'm a repeat offender of "accidental theft of ballpoint pen" and if the law was applied to the fullest I'd have way more than three strikes. I think it's mostly because siphoning off gas to power your car is generally recognized as a crime, siphoning off electricity to do the same sounds equivalent. It doesn't sound like something you could do without at least some form of permission. It's all fairly relative though, if EVs become common it might be commonly understood that sockets are there for charging them and you'd need to explicitly deny it. But that's ten, twenty years from now and not today.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  131. Re:Theft? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    My question is how long was the chord he used to charge?

    Most schools I've been to you'd need a very long chord to reach an outside receptacle from the parking lot.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  132. Use the police for parenting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use the police for parenting, seems to be all the rage in the US.

    No wonder they fail so good.

  133. how is this different from siphoning gas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you guys that think he shouldn't be arrested be ok with him siphoning some gas out of your car?

  134. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

    It's true. He might have really been there 2.5 hours, and stole a whole quarter.

  135. Re:Do they arrest people for using block heaters t by Minwee · · Score: 1

    In Georgia? Where the temperature drops below 0 C for about twelve minutes every year?

    I would be surprised if you could even _find_ a block heater in that state, let alone plug it in and use it.

  136. Bolt cutters and gloves by Malenx · · Score: 1

    The cop should have just removed the offending charging cable with some rubber gloves and a bolt cutter. Problem solved.

  137. laptop by miroku000 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure if the guy plugged his laptop into the wall or his cell phone, no one would complain.

  138. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    What would the ticket be for? You don't ticket thieves, you arrest them - and this "gentlemen" is a thief caught red-handed. Too damned bad he didn't consider the rest of his life before he siphoned energy without feeling the need to pay for it.

  139. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by c0lo · · Score: 1

    And he can arrest him because he has more than a reasonable suspicion that he took something (a product or service) that didn't belong to him, without permission, and with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of it.

    Man, you are talking through you nose here... it's AC current, the electrons in school's wires are still in place, not a single one is lost.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  140. Power acceleration by alfino · · Score: 1

    Wow, 1KW/*hour*. Does that mean it's drawing more the longer you leave it on? ;)

    --
    echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
  141. it's not 8.3A by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    It's 12A. And the breaker will be at 15A. 12A is the max allowed for continuous on a 15A circuit (20% derate) and car charging is considered continuous use by code.

    The breakers will not be rated for over 20A. It depends on the wire, but the outlets aren't rated for more than 15A usually, 20A tops and you cannot put a breaker higher than the outlet rating on a circuit in the US. In other countries like the UK where outlets are individually fused, you can have a high power "ring circuit" such as you speak of.

    It is very easy to trip circuit breakers charging EVs off random outlets like this. This alone is a good reason for people not to charge off random outlets like this, think of the people inside who lose services because you tripped their breaker.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:it's not 8.3A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and you cannot put a breaker higher than the outlet rating on a circuit in the US.

      "Back to apprentice" here- I won't stoop to your insults but I will point out that, once again, you are mistaken. The sad thing is that some people will naively believe you.

      In every house in the USA are 12 gauge wired circuits, breakered at 20 amps, which have 15 amp outlets. This is standard practice, done every day. You could make a living going around scaring people and changing the NEMA 5-15 to NEMA 5-20 ones. You'd be doing a great service because the new ones will (should!) be shuttered.

      Your quoting of NEMA codes does not impress; any chimpanzee can look them up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEMA_connector (and I am proof!)

      In fact, a 20 amp 120V outlet does not prevent one from plugging in a 15 amp plug.

      If you want to do something useful with all of your angst, you should crusade against 16 and 18 gauge extension cords. Buy a boatload of 12 and 14 gauge extension cords, go around trading people for their 16 and 18 gauge ones, and instead of posting on slashdot, read slashdot while stripping the insulation from the 16 and 18 gauge cords and recycle the copper- you'll get close to $3/pound http://scrapcopperprices.net/.

    2. Re:it's not 8.3A by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Poorly rated extension cords piss me off ...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  142. Yes, the Logic dictates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot is an idiot, even when he or she is wearing a uniform or sits in the Senate.

  143. Without signs, is it theft? by swb · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but if a public building has a resource available in a common area without access controls or signage indicating its use is restricted, isn't it a reasonable assumption that the resource is a public accomodation available for all to use?

    It seems to me that it's not reasonable to make resources available without signage or access controls in a public space and then arrest someone for actually using them.

    There may be finer-grained questions about what would constitute "reasonable use" -- ie, I can't run a hose from a public drinking fountain to fill my swimming pool, and maybe charging EVs would violate reasonable use, but unless you post rules for the outlet or some kind of locking mechanism, using an outlet on the outside of a public building to charge an EV in the building's parking lot doesn't seem like theft.

  144. Employers would fire for this too! by Cobol+God · · Score: 1

    An employer I had a few years ago stated that any electrical device plugged in at work premises would be "theft" and you would be fired and charges pressed against you. No cell phone recharging, no lamp, no fan, nothing that plugged in. You plug it in and they catch you = lose your job and get arrested. Seen the Operations Manager have security pull someone from their desk and walk them out the door for plugging in a cell phone and then putting it in a desk drawer to try to hide it.

    I would never just ASSUME something like a electrical outlet or water or anything is OK to use just because you can reach it.

    Would you park in someones driveway and decide to wash your car because HEY they left a hose right there where you can reach?
    Would you just take a plant from someones garden because hey you can reach it from the sidewalk?
    Theft is theft.

    1. Re:Employers would fire for this too! by bdo19 · · Score: 1

      An employer I had a few years ago stated that any electrical device plugged in at work premises would be "theft" and you would be fired and charges pressed against you. No cell phone recharging, no lamp, no fan, nothing that plugged in. You plug it in and they catch you = lose your job and get arrested. Seen the Operations Manager have security pull someone from their desk and walk them out the door for plugging in a cell phone and then putting it in a desk drawer to try to hide it.

      And from what you're saying, it sounds like you really liked working there. That operations manager must have been a great guy. Great working environment. Mutual respect all around! So let's make the whole world work that way.

    2. Re:Employers would fire for this too! by Cobol+God · · Score: 1

      And from what you're saying, it sounds like you really liked working there. That operations manager must have been a great guy. Great working environment. Mutual respect all around! So let's make the whole world work that way.

      Actually hated it.. It had over 120% employee turnover one year. The Operations Manager was actually a woman who got the position because of looks. She would get someone from our department to do her powerpoint and excel spreadsheets for her for her bosses.

      But I worked for several other software companies here in Florida that had the same rule. I actually left the software industry for retail sales for less pay but MUCH less stress and hassle.

  145. Absolutism by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    Your absolutism is puerile. Arrest someone for plugging a device into a public outlet? It's the height of insanity. Do you also advocate for slamming someone to the pavement if they enter a crosswalk one second before the Walk sign illuminates? It's technically jaywalking, so why not, eh? Should you face the massive fines and jail terms described in the fine print of a government document if you leave off a period in your address? Hey, you signed it to attest it's accurate, right? It's. Your. Fault. Please remove yourself from our company until such time as you can demonstrate an adult, mature understanding of the world we live in.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  146. Slashdot reporting. by westlake · · Score: 1

    We only have the driver's word that he been drawing power from the outlet for a bare twenty minutes.

    In North America and Japan using a standard household outlet (120-volt, 15 amp breaker, 12 amp maximum allowable draw, 1.4 kW) and the 7.5-meter (25 ft) cable included by Nissan, the Leaf will regain approximately 5 miles of range per hour. This type of charging is ideal for the commuter that can plug into standard outlets at home and at work during the typical 21 hours a day that the typical North American car is parked. It is also useful for emergency charging from any ubiquitous 120-volt outlet just about anywhere in North America.

    Nissan Leaf: Recharging

    The Chamblee Middle School [Google Maps] has limited public parking

    It puzzles me how anyone not on staff could have found an accessible outlet within cord length.

    I think it is within bounds for the officer to ask whether as staff or guest of the school you have permission to draw down 12 amps from an unmarked and unsecured 15 amp line --- which may be in use elsewhere.

    Theft of services is a crime.

    But the greater crime may be to assume that any random electrical outlet you come across can safely charge your car.

  147. Re:Do we need sings on each outlet in a public pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is a sing on an outlet? Dammit Joe, I was kind of proud of you today. I refrained from flaming any of your other posts because they were mostly coherant but then you just blow it with this one...

  148. It's going to come to the point by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Where all organizations are going to have to install charging stations. And the rate around here in 14 cents per kWh - so let's say you're in an office 8 hours a day, that would come out to $1.12 a day, or $5.60 a week, or a total of $291.20 per year to keep your car plugged in 8 hours a day for 5 days a week.

    I say put them in supermarkets and charge a couple bucks to charge, put em' in places of business and charge what I showed above. Electric cars would be all over the place.

    1. Re:It's going to come to the point by tftp · · Score: 1

      I say put them in supermarkets and charge a couple bucks to charge

      That would be comparable, or more expensive, than gasoline. A $2 = 0.5 gallons, or about 20 miles of travel. A 30 minute charge may not give you that much of a range boost, unless it is one of Tesla's Superchargers.

  149. Service Paid For by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    If it's a public school, then a tax-paying citizen can reasonably claim he has already paid for the electricity in question. Should we now ask special permission to walk down the sidewalk or drive down the street? No, of course not. We as taxpayers have already paid for it.

    The policeman was way, way out of line. He should find himself without a job in short order. Boneheads like him give commanders ulcers with the PR fallout.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:Service Paid For by tgd · · Score: 1

      If it's a public school, then a tax-paying citizen can reasonably claim he has already paid for the electricity in question. Should we now ask special permission to walk down the sidewalk or drive down the street? No, of course not. We as taxpayers have already paid for it.

      The policeman was way, way out of line. He should find himself without a job in short order. Boneheads like him give commanders ulcers with the PR fallout.

      Except you can't... you can't go to the public school and use its fields without permission. You can't go into its wood shop and fire up a table saw. You can't sit down in the library and use their wireless. Just like you can't walk into town hall and make photo copies, or grab a cup of coffee from the break room in the police station.

      Your fundamental premise is absolutely incorrect. You paying for it, as a taxpayer, is completely irrelevant.

  150. please go back to apprenticing by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, a breaker doesn't immediately trip at 0.1A over. Not even close.

    And you say there are 40A outlets? No kidding. I would think you'd know the names NEMA 14-50 and NEMA 6-50 (stove/dryer outlets). This article isn't about NEMA 14s or 6s or the rare 5-50., it's about regular NEMA 5 household outlets ("standard 115v nominal household (NEMA 5-15p) plug is rated for 15 amps").

    Please tell me your name so I can know I'm not having you wire my house.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:please go back to apprenticing by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Why do you believe a commercial building has regular household outlets on the outside?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  151. if this goes to court ask for a jury trial by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    if this goes to court ask for a jury trial

  152. Re:Theft? by c_jonescc · · Score: 1

    So, your interpretation is that any use of the outlet outside of official school business is stealing. That's fine. I think it's unclear.

    Shall a faculty member charging a personal cell phone also expect to overnight in jail? With the absolutism you're using, I don't see how you can suggest this situation is different.

    And, that should be absurd to anyone.

    --
    Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
  153. School shares a huge part of the blame in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an entirely different way to look at this. The EV owner stated he was there because his child was attending a tennis event. This event, like all events held at school, would have been prearranged with the school. The school had to, reasonably, assume that resources not directly related to the event would be consumed and reasonable wear-and-tear would happen, the tennis court and seating area would sustain some damage from use, drinking water would be consumed and water used in restroom facilities and, yes, even electricity from outlets. I, therefore, submit that the school setup, essentially, an invitation to use these resources because they A) allowed the event to occur on school property and B) made no effort to restrict the use of said resources. To say a "theft is a theft" is completely disingenuous.

  154. feal safer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great police work I feel much safer now that the criminal was caught red handed !

  155. The asshat who drove the Leaf by verifine · · Score: 1

    I work at a college and we have no problem when people plug in various chargers. We're talking 60-80 watts max for a laptop, 5-20 for a phone or tablet. At a kilowatt-hour per hour for his EV, we're talking 1000 watts, or about 8.3 amps at 120 volts, give or take the efficiencies & power factors involved. There's a HUGE difference between the use of (in our case) college electricity for charging a mobile device, and 'fueling' your car on our nickel.

    The entitlement mentality of the asshat driving the Leak (er, Leaf) that he has the 'right' to plug in to any outlet he sees is the real problem. Who knows where else he has plugged in, thinking that anyone who has electricity somehow owes him 'fuel' for his vehicle. I have no problem whatever that the police officer arrested him. Reading a number of comments on the ARS Technica site, I was amazed at people who looked only at the amount and totally ignored the intent. The issue worthy of contemplation here, IMHO, is the driver's intent to steal 'fuel' for his ride wherever he could find it.

    Using his logic, I should siphon some gas from one of the idle school buses when I'm visiting. After all, my taxes paid for it!

    The fact his kid goes to school there and he pays taxes is totally moot. If a rake was leaning up against the building, why shouldn't he take that? Yes, it's a lot more than $0.05, but that's a matter of scale, not a matter of intent. Simply because he drives an EV (which my tax dollars subsidized, whether I like it or not) does not further entitle him to steal his 'fuel.'

  156. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by c_jonescc · · Score: 1

    He was arrested at 8p, specifically to ensure he had to spend the night in jail.

    Yes, they did investigate before making the arrest and determine that he did something chargeable. Good on them.

    Then they threw him in jail overnight for...? What exactly? Even requesting a court appearance via the mail (such as with a moving violation from traffic cams) would be ludicrous in this case, but they wanted to maximize their punishment, it would appear.

    What part of that glossed over bit that they intentionally arrested him after the courts are closed is reasonable?

    --
    Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
  157. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    He's not charging. He's arresting

    He reported. The arrest came days later.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  158. Re:Theft? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    Almost every new-user-hire paperwork I've read recently includes "reasonable use of facility" language that includes things like charging your phone at your desk.

    The guy who rolled up on a municipal building and plugged in his Leaf was a douche. I imagine that an overwhelming percentage of Leaf owners not planning a trip to a friend's house for an overnight leave their charger firmly plugged in in their garage. ..but there's plenty of power vampires out there. [In my neighborhood, it's mostly the hipster homeless (ipads and laptops, but no home) using the power plug at the gazebo by the library for their WiFi to watch Netflix. *shrug* Priorities.]

    PlugShare, among other apps, shows parking spots where users have reported "unguarded" outlets. I expect hobo-style chalk symbols soon. :/

  159. Re:Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I just think you're being intentionally obtuse.

    So, faculty are fine. Everyone else in the world that plugs anything into a public school's outside outlets deserves to have their dinner interrupted for a punitive night in jail? Gee, that's not very reasonable. I'd not want to be a contributing member of that society. No flexibility is the best, right?

    How's that concern about homeless people with ipads working out for you when it comes to general life contentment? I guess absolutists find judgement satisfying, so maybe quite well.

  160. Re:Do they arrest people for using block heaters t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The incident was from the southern state of Georgia. They would probably become confused as to what a block heater was and arrest you for whatever they could think of.

  161. The law (Re:De minimis principle) by gargleblast · · Score: 1

    The law does not concern itself with trifles:

    There was a young man named Rex
    Who had diminutive organs of sex
    When charged with exposure
    He said with composure
    De minimis non curat lex

    Determining the size of the arresting officer's gonads is left as an exercise for the reader.

  162. what about water fountains ? by pguyton · · Score: 1

    I would demand that they monitor and arrest every person using the water fountain as well, after all water is also metered and billed , so any non student drinking should be arrested as well right?

  163. Guy arrested for being an a-hole, not a thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like from the 11alive report, he was arrested for being an a-hole, not a thief. According to TFA his kid was not taking tennis lessons, but rather Kaveh himself was playing tennis. He had been barred by the school from using the tennis courts. Obviously there is some history between Kaveh and the school which the police uncovered when investigating. According to TFA he claimed the cops had damaged his car, while their dashcam video shows the damage preceded the cops' arrival.

    I think the theft charge of $0.05 is the cops getting back at him for being an a-hole.

    In his defense, the incident occurred on a Saturday so the school was closed and he couldn't ask if he top up his car. How much has to be stolen, in the form of electricity, before becomes theft? What if a bunch of EV owners showed up on a regular basis and charged up their cars? Each one is not taking that much, but in aggregate the school is subsidizing the transportation costs of the EV users.

  164. I think it is clearly justified... by ishamael69 · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one who actually read the article? He was banned from using the tennis courts that he was using. The cops had a 911 call about the plug. He accused the cops of damaging his porperty and was confrontational. I've got no problem with him being arrested.

  165. Reminds me of eating grapes in grocery stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember once a grocery store's manager asked me to leave the store or he would call the police over 2 grapes that I ate. He just did that because I'm a young man and alone, he is a manager, so for him I'm an easy target to release his daily life frustrations on. He told me to pay for 2 grapes, I laugh and because I laugh at him over this, he told me to leave the store. This case is as ridiculous and I it does is to fuel the anger growing in the public's hearts over cops. Just like I have hatred over that manager and the people working at that grcery store, citizens have growg hatred over cops and people with authority. Good job mister the officer!

    1. Re:Reminds me of eating grapes in grocery stores by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, you were stealing.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Reminds me of eating grapes in grocery stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a young man and alone

      You're alone because you think it's okay to steal produce. It's not a snack bar.

  166. Re:Theft? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    Everyone else in the world that plugs anything into a public school's outside outlets deserves to have their dinner interrupted for a punitive night in jail? Gee, that's not very reasonable.

    Why isn't it reasonable?

    If the guy was siphoning just a tiny bit of gas from a school bus, I'd have him arrested.
    If he was wandering into the chemistry department and stealing only one flask, I'd have him arrested.
    If he was only digging up one plant of their landscaping, I'd have him arrested.

    What's the difference? What makes stealing electricity OK?

    I think the guy stealing penny candy at the supermarket is a colossal douche too. Fuck him. I have to pay a tiny percentage more for my penny candy for every one of those assholes. Fuck them all running.

    Everyone's making a big deal out of what time they went to get him. You go to the address on his driver's license in the evening, because he's likely to be home instead of at work.

    It takes 20 hours to fully charge a Leaf on 110. A 30-minute charge gets you 1/40th of a "tank" or about 2 miles. It's not worth going out of your way to get 2 miles of charge. It's not only a dick move on his part, it's a giant waste of time.

    I don't accept "I only stole 5 cents of electricity" as a defense. HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING. Those are the worst kind of assholes - the ones who'll do it because they're entitled to do it. I'll just steal some electricity from the city -- I mean, lol, what are they going to do about it...

    ...oh

    Good. Screw him. Gives a bad name to the rest of us Leaf owners.

  167. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah...but your post is going along with our anti-cop rants, even if it is 100% true.

  168. Maybe it was because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they thought Kaveh Kamooneh sounded foreign.

  169. Re:Theft? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    It was a school, that's not really a building intended for full public access. If this was an outlet in a public park I would agree, but not at a school.

  170. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Also the cop was responding to a 911 call specifically about that car being plugged in to the outlet.

  171. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by jcochran · · Score: 1

    The officer could have given him a Notice to Appear. That would require him to go to court and deal with the matter. However, a NTA is not an arrest and as such doesn't result in an entry in the NCIC database. It would have remained a local matter and dealt with locally without frankly screwing up the gentleman's life. The office quite frankly did the worst possible thing he could do for a $0.05 offense. And before you claim that the officer wasn't aware of the magnitude of the offense, that ... creature ... spent 10 days to verify his charges. You think he couldn't figure out that the maximum draw was on the order of a kilowatt? The officer basically spent a hell of a lot more than $0.05 of government money in order to screw over that person for life. And the timing on the arrest? Well, that's just icing on the cake.

  172. 911? Seriously? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

    I thought 911 was meant for emergency calls. This hardly seems like an emergency.

  173. No Brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect Joe Public believes EV's suck dollars of electricity out of the socket per minute -- ie, not quite as fast as gas out of the pump. This is going to need to be another prong of the fight against anti-EV sentiment.

  174. Your Twisted View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have a strange viewpoint. I don't share your viewpoint. Fortunately, the law doesn't share your viewpoint either.

    The law says that unauthorized use of electrical or water facilities is illegal. I, like you, have electrical outlets and faucets on the exterior of my home. They are for my use alone and the law supports this. Just because some thieving douche with a sense of entitlement sees it does not permit him to use it legally.

    When my neighbor's construction crew starts using my water to wash up and I tell them to GTFO, they do! For they know that if they fail to GTFO and I call the police, they will be charged with theft of service AND trespassing. Rightly so, too.

    By your twisted thinking, if I see your wife in the yard, I can utilize her services for myself. No harm done, implies you. The law sees this differently.

    1. Re: Your Twisted View by crdotson · · Score: 1

      While I agree you have the right to tell them to GTFO, I think you're a real jerk for not letting them use a little water.

    2. Re: Your Twisted View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the A.C. in the conservation, but here are my two cents...

      The construction company should ask permission first before using someone's property, even if it's adjacent. This goes for electricity, water, or laying down construction equipment in your yard. I would find it lazy for the construction workers to not get permission. I would find it kind of lousy for a property owner to not give permission (for the water from a hose thing). But I don't know if there is a good solution for when the construction workers take without permission. What is one to do?

    3. Re:Your Twisted View by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > You have a strange viewpoint. I don't share your viewpoint.

      Let me try to elaborate just a bit that might help then.... I don't really think its ok to steal power, water or anything. However, I do think people can be a bit mindless, and not think, and make assumptions and do small, mostly inconsequential stupid things.

      So...I think the state probably can and should step in for many issues of theft, but, really should have some sort of thresholds to determine where they will or wont: and people have a responsibility to try to not create situations that will result in them relying on the state to come in and solve their problem for them.

      For example... if you put a power outlet, on the edge of your property, by the street, or by where public people park cars, or wait for the bus. That is your right. If you add no signage, make no attempt to hide it, or switch it, or otherwise control it.... you are not doing that. If someone steals a significant amount from you, sure, the state should still deal with a problem like that, but, for really small infractions, you didn't live up to your end of being responsible enough to deserve someone else coming in and fixing it for you.

      If someone clearly ignored a posted sign, if they came into your property in a more than superficial manner, if they circumvented some access control...sure. But....if you just put a fountain or outlet there where any schmuck with a phone charger could plug in.

      Its not that its right for people to do it.... its that you could easily prevent it without the states help, and chose not to, and yet, want them to step in at great expense to everyone else and waste resources arresting and charging people over something so small.

      Its not the states job to agressively deal with everything that is unfair no matter how insignificant. Frankly, if this is the best they have, its an argument for downsizing the legal system.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  175. Should not have gotten this far. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Leaf driver should have given the school $0.10 and then the driver should agree to not plug in anymore without permission. The fact that this was elevated to law enforcement suggests to me that one or more of the parties involved is guilty of first degree asshattery.

    1. Re:Should not have gotten this far. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Essentially this.
      All it took was a school official walking out and saying "Please don't use our power".
      Bad neighborhood, then have your security guard do it.
      Can nobody use common sense anymore?
      I'm guessing the car owner did something that pissed off the cop, whether right or wrong, and the cop got back at him.

  176. Slashdot moderation by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

    On Slashdot, one can get modded "troll" for pointing out that people shouldn't be considered guilty without at least _some_ evidence. "I bet" does not count as evidence.

  177. Re:Henchman? Looks more like another Entitlement by JayBat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you were actually concerned about expense to taxpayers, you would be complaining about the cop wasting police department time and money, and the court's time and money, and you would have a point. As it it is though, you're just being silly. -Jay-

  178. Re:WRONG UNITS IDIOT (Pedants' corner now open) by zap1992 · · Score: 1

    No, all units are lowercase in SI (in English), but abbreviations of units named after people are usually capitalized. For example, 1 joule per second (1 J/s) is equal to 1 watt (1 W).

  179. Very, very dangerous - run away power draw by Gogogoch · · Score: 1

    The school is very, very luck to have stopped this power drain so early. At a rate of 1kW/hr, the car would have drawn 2kW by hour 2, and 10kW after 10 hours. This is very dangerous - to have an energy draw that is accelerating!

    Why oh why didn't they design a car that just draw 1kW? You know, as in 3600 kJ/hour? That would be much more sensible.

    Having an accelerating power draw - 1kW/hr - is a recipe for disaster. Explosions and stuff.

  180. I think the same cop should arrest the FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the same cop should arrest the FED -- Printing money out of thin air - same as counterfeit !!

  181. SMH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give him the chair!

  182. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    Imagine if everytime you went to the store, you took a nickel out of the till. Now imagine everyone doing the same thing. No one person is "stealing that much" but in aggregate, they are stealing the store into bankruptcy.

    What does that have to do with this? Nothin'.

    In short, STEALING is a crime, because it wrong

    That makes no sense. What is moral is not always legal, and what is immoral is not always illegal. Stealing isn't necessarily a crime merely because it's wrong.

  183. Re:Theft? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    Looks like contempt of cop. The cop was obviosly offended and felt he had to get the guy so he waited to arrest him till 8pm for what at best is misdemeaner theft the guy is going to at worst get a small fine or couple hours community service. Likely that unless the cop is friends with the prosecuter or Judge he'll probably get a warning. But as you said, the cop knew all that but wanted to punish the guy so he arrested him at 8pm to make sure he spends a night in jail.

  184. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by firewrought · · Score: 1

    What part of this confuses you? He was arrested, after much consultation, for a crime he admits doing, that a policeman caught him doing, which the school did not give permission for him to do, petty though it is.

    Two parts: (1) traditionally, the availability of a readily accessible power outlet has been a cue that the outlet is available for (free) use by everyone who's authorized to be in the area. It's not a theft because--in the language of our existing social norms and conventions--the receptacle is actually an invitation unless there's specific signage to the contrary. If you don't believe that, well, then you'd better not charge your personal cell phone at work, plugin your laptop at the airport, or hookup your GPS to your buddy's lighter port without getting explicit permission.

    And (2) the part about it being only 5 cents. It does society no good to saddle innocent, productive citizens with criminal records for a 5-cent infraction. That's just crazy. Seeing things in such black-and-white terms creates a user-hostile society that is focused on legalism and pedantry to the exclusion of real justice.

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  185. Re:Theft? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Schools are not 'public' buildings, sorry to burst your ignorance bubble. They are for students registered in them to be at certain times of the day. Students can not freely roam schools whenever they want.

    PARENTS MUST VISIT THE OFFICE AND REGISTER OR BE GIVEN EXPLICITLY PERMISSION IN ADVANCE IN EVERY SCHOOL IN THE NATION FOR SECURITY PURPOSES. It has been this way for years.

    You are not allowed to take the computers that are in the building ... paid for by public funds. You are not allowed to walk into the cafeteria at 1am and make yourself a snack. You are not allow to take a fucking desk because you paid your taxes.

    The problem is your stupid thought that these are public buildings that anyone can do anything they want with. Thats as retarded as saying that its okay for me to take every book in a library and keep it at my house forever since I paid my taxes and its public property.

    You fucks with your 'I'm entitled to everything' mentality need to get a freaking clue.

    The drinking fountain IS NOT THERE FOR PUBLIC USE. Its there for STUDENT USE. You're just ignorant of reality and assume that you too are entitled to use it. You're wrong.

    There is no problem with clarity, you're just an idiot who hasn't learned that you're not entitled to take whatever you want.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  186. Re:Theft? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    why exactly is his car different from a phone, or a laptop?

    Are you seriously on slashdot posting that stupid of a question? Quantity might have something to do with it.

    Faculty is supposed to be there. Parents are not authorized to roam around randomly at any school in the nation without prior authorization from the office.

    And when he was told multiple times to stop ... but kept doing it ... oh, thats okay right? Because its on a building paid for by public funds, anyone can use that power.

    Shit, why do I even pay my own electric bill. I'm right next door to a school, a few hundred feet of good quality wire and I can just use all the free public electricity I want, right? I mean thats what you're saying, right? Its perfectly acceptable for all of us to hook up to those outlets and then bitch when they blow and demand better service ... right?

    God you're a moron.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  187. Re:Theft? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Those people aren't homeless, begging is their job. $50 says they go home to a nicer house than you do.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  188. Re:Theft? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    We do know. Its in the article. He was told multiple times he wasn't allowed to do that.

    There is no 'may' to it, you're just making shit up because you're too lazy to find out what actually happened.

    The 'facts we don't know' are in the 'article you didn't bother to read'

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  189. kWh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much for nerds that can' spell kWh.

    Energy = Power x time.

    Not

    Energy = Power / time.

  190. 15 Jail Days per Dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 hours in jail for using 4 cents of electricity - which works out to 15 days per dollar used. The Leaf has a battery capacity of 24KWh. Assuming that it is completely depleted, and that electricity costs .10 per KWh, then a full charge would cost $2.40 or 37.5 days in jail.

  191. Think again. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Personally, I am perfectly ok with setting the precedent that if you put something that looks like a service out in public with no control over it whatsoever, you are giving them implicit license to use it.

    In our state, access to a public or private school is legally restricted.

    You must have a legitimate reason for being on the grounds. You will not be allowed to roam about freely. You will not be allowed access to students, staff, facilities or services without explict permission.

  192. Shows how screwed up society has become by PC_THE_GREAT · · Score: 1

    This is a blatant example of how stupid people are getting day by day. Morons makes a big deal out of simple issue, I can sense authority abuse here when for something as minor (which would eat way too much tax payer's money into processing such a minor offense), Probably the cop was a jerk who wanted to show he had authority. Secondly, the entire population just stays silent and assumes it is normal that huge sums of money are being stolen by politics, fake contracts etc.. no news is made out of such major issues. It is pretty laughable at how humans have become like sheeps, feeling powerless against bigger issues and bike shedding over minor issues.

    1. Re:Shows how screwed up society has become by PC_THE_GREAT · · Score: 1

      From the article, both seems to be major jerks, this could have been prevented if both didn't want to argue about who has got the biggest d!ck. But the, 15hours jail time + an arrest, when specifically there was no mention of a notice that said "electricity is not for the general public", that is enough to turn a good man into a killer :s, seriously, spending 15 hours of jail time and undergoing an arrest when i can't see me being at fault, anyone would stay by butchering the school principles, and whoever is incharge of that police station, maybe even the judge who dared do something so stupid :s. Then people complain that there are criminals. pfft. The create it.

  193. It's all about the power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Little known fact.

    In Georgia, if you pseudoanonymously pay the power company for the electricity used in a wireless video system installed in someone else's house, which does not transmit audio, you are technically not violating the law, circa 2003. Not sure about now, but it probably hasn't changed.

  194. It's the principle... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    you have to clamp down on this or else people with these cars would be charging their vehicles for "free" wherever they can find an outlet... I would also include recharging electric bicyles here but not include recharging items such as the light sets for bicycles as they're a safety item.

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  195. The DA isn't going to pursue this by JonBoy47 · · Score: 1

    At my work, the security guards found a Chevy Volt plugged into an outlet in the parking garage during the work-day. Back of the envelope calculation is the car sucked up about $1.50 in electricity. Security did an email blast (including a photo of the verboten electrical hook-up) to the site's entire workforce, chastening us to not do this, with warnings about violations of federal law and such. Based on the rate at which my time gets billed, they were already well in the red just from me reading the email, to say nothing of the time someone spent taking the photo, composing the email, or the several thousand of my contractor co-workers who undoubtedly also read it. If the local district attorney has even two active brain cells, he's not going to actually pursue this case. Ignoring the PR nightmare, the costs to pursue the case, relative to the financial loss incurred, aren't even close.

    Bottom line: You want random people to not use the electricity you pay for? Don't fucking put outlets outside where random people can access them.

  196. Impressive by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

    1KW/h
    Impressive. That's approximately -4018267F*W/year.

  197. Seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Georgia resembles Texas in that law enforcement gets off the rails and acts like they are having some sort of moral epilepsy in which cops momentarily lose all sense of proportion and obsess over strange moral issues. I am not certain that cops and judges afflicted with this disorder can be brought back to normal mental health..

  198. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps you wont mind he use your external outlets without permission...

  199. Binary options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Below you will find our step by step guide which will hopefully give you a better and deeper insight into how it is possible for you to make money with Binary Options trading, once you have read through this checklist then we cordially invite you to continue to have a good look around our site as all the information you will need to be a profitable Binary Options trader can be found within our website.
    http://binary-options-trader.net/

  200. Re:Henchman? Looks more like another Entitlement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck was this dumbass post modded up? See JayBat's response for why this dumb fucking post is so dumb.

  201. Seriously. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I agree you have the right to tell them to GTFO, I think you're a real jerk for not letting them use a little water.

    While I feel very strongly that you are entitled to your opinion, I don't give a F what you think about me or that you think I'm a jerk for not giving my things away to other people.

    It's mine! No one has any right to use it without my permission. The value is irrelevant. You don't own it yourself therefore you are not entitled to use it!

    A #2 pencil costs 8 cents at an office supply store. Does anyone really think it's OK to walk one out without paying for it? It's only a pencil. It's only 8 cents. So they should be permitted to help themselves?

    Where do people get the idea that other people's property or possessions(that they have to pay for) should be free for you to use? Seriously! Where the fuck do you get this idea? Even animals, including fish, birds, monkeys, and chimps, understand the concept of property and possessions and defend said same, sometimes to the death! Yet, so many humans seem to think that it should be OK for them to steal other people's stuff for a long list of ludicrous excuses and bullshit reasoning.

    It's NOT yours! Don't fucking touch it without permission! Ignore this at your peril.

    1. Re:Seriously. WTF? by crdotson · · Score: 1

      While I agree you have the right to post the above rant, I think you're a real jerk. :)

  202. Re:Theft? by gsslay · · Score: 1

    I was all for it until you mentioned his dinner. At that point a line was crossed!

    This guy does nothing to deserve our sympathy. He was on the school grounds, using the school's tennis courts after being specifically told he did not have permission to be there. Then he decides it's a good idea to plug into the school's electricity to get a free charge for his car. What kind of thinking allows him to do that? And when he's called on it, he gives the cop grief.

    He knew exactly what he was doing, and he knew he had no right to that electricity. We only have his word for it that it was only 20mins charge. He could have been doing this every day for weeks. Anything that happened to him is a result of him purposely being a dick.

  203. Re:Theft? by c_jonescc · · Score: 1

    I see, so this is only a theft because of the quantity, and I'm a moron for not realizing it.

    Or, as other posters state, all theft is theft, and quantity is irrelevant, and I should realize that.

    The point is that there's no clear line about what assumptions are common when it comes to an exterior outlet in a public space. I haven't seen anything that clears up whether this outlet was for the use of students or faculty for personal electronics, or not - though that may be due to my lack of literacy. Originally, it appeared that he was the parent of a student on premises at the time, which makes it all a bit gray, in my moronic, non-knee jerk perspective.

    Thanks for the lack of toxic communication though. It's nice when we can talk things through as a community without resorting to the greater fuckwad hypothesis.

    --
    Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
  204. Re:Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, all crimes deserve a night in jail?
    All theft. All spitting on the sidewalk. All jaywalking. All anything that makes other people in some class subset look bad get a night in jail!

    Go USA!

  205. The rest of the story by Jeff_Birt · · Score: 0

    I was reading about this on another website and it seems that there is more to the story. This person was asked several times to NOT plug in his car at the school and was also asked by other establishments NOT to plug in his car there either. This is not a case of a cop being overzealous but rather a person who habitually ignores property owners/managers and has a habit of stealing power from multiple places. It may not be a lot of money form one location but it is no different than if he pulled into a parking lot and started draining gas from other cars.

  206. Re: Henchman? Looks more like another Entitlement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The community will probably turn a profit on this after the Judge imposes a wallet incinerating fine on the thief.

  207. be nice to cops by wellsdm · · Score: 1

    He didn't really get in trouble for stealing the electricity, he got in trouble for being a jerk to a cop. He could totally have gotten off with a warning if he'd only been nice about it.

  208. No states have a law about plugging anything in by doccus · · Score: 1

    The isiot cop doesn't even know the law. There are NO LAWS on the books about plugging anything whatsoever into any outlet anywhere.. and no... i can't give a citation for something that doies not exist. The judge should throw the book at that cop for wasting the system's time and money. Hiope he gets canned..

  209. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    A publicly accessible outlet is an invitation to be used by the public.

    The tendency for simply INSANE Americans to declare anyone and everyone possible a "thief", for the primary purpose of somehow elevating themselves, is INSANE. And many of us are tire of your brand of self righteous, indignant cray cray.

    If you're going to charge him then everyone plugging in a tablet, phone, whatever needs to be charged. Fill those jails up, create plenty of criminal records, keep the courts busy.

    Asshole.

  210. Re:Henchman? Looks more like another Entitlement by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Or make these outlets metered -- put in a dime, draw up to 1KW of electricity, for ANY purpose.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  211. Re:That was not the reason by petervandervos · · Score: 1

    In the article:
    Given the uncooperative attitude and accusations of damage to his vehicle, the officer chose to document the incident on an incident report.

    If he had said 'yes sir, sorry sir', nothing had happend. So the officer wanted to teach him a lesson. Look likes it backfired.

  212. De Minimis Non Curat Lex by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Look it up if the translation isn't obvious.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  213. The spin Dr is in by frankenpc510 · · Score: 1

    Next up: Electricity companies invent DRM based electrons. "Without our spin verification, your wheels won't"

  214. Re: No by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Koch blocking?

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  215. Re: Henchman? Looks more like another Entitlement by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    As if anyone whose cell phone was dying and had a charger would think twice about just plugging that in.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  216. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then send the jackbooted thugs to my house so they can lock me up for life. I have plugged in my mobile phones, tablets, cameras and laptops in hundreds of outlets around the world in convention centers, airports, restaurants, doctor's office lobbies, schools, airplanes, etc. I have stolen electricity from all of these people. Never once have I asked permission and many times I was not a paying customer of the establishment. As you have pointed out, the amount is irrelevant, so let's get going.

    It's time that me and the millions of other businessmen be locked away for stealing electricity to charge our devices while we travel. Because that makes total and absolute sense.

    Stealing is stealing. There's no excuse. There's no exceptions. The law is the law. Everything is purely black and white.

    Sigh. It's time we go back to analog computers. Slashdot is chock full of people who can only think in binary. Yes/No. One/Zero. Absolutely right/absolutely wrong. Plugging in a phone = rape = murder.

  217. Re: Henchman? Looks more like another Entitlement by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I bet Dad could have just parked his big old diesel pickemup truck under an open window and left the motor running the whole half hour giving everyone in school a nice dose of heavy metal particulates soaked in carcinogens, and Mr. Liberals-feel-entitled here would feel compelled to defend that due to his good libertarian principles.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  218. The Guy in Question was an Absolute Jerkazoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'd had previous run-ins with the same school and they finally told him to stay off the school property - *before* this latest incident occurred. From the police report:

    "The officer, his marked patrol vehicle and the electric vehicle were all in clear view of the tennis courts. Eventually, a man on the courts told the officer that the man playing tennis with him owned the vehicle. The officer went to the courts and interviewed the vehicle owner. The officer's initial incident report gives a good indication of how difficult and argumentative the individual was to deal with. He made no attempt to apologize or simply say oops and he wouldn't do it again. Instead he continued being argumentative, acknowledged he did not have permission and then accused the officer of having damaged his car door. The officer told him that was not true and that the vehicle and existing damage was already on his vehicles video camera from when he drove up. Given the uncooperative attitude and accusations of damage to his vehicle, the officer chose to document the incident on an incident report."

    This reminds me, 25 years ago, when I was doing a training ride with the University of Florida cycling team, and we blew through a stop sign going about 40mph (it was down a pretty good sized hill). As it turned out, we had a police car behind us - and not just any police car, but the Alachua County Sheriff... Red lights and siren, and we pulled over to the side of the road, he got out of his car and said, verbatim, "Boys, y'all in a world of hurt. I've just caught y'all red-handed not only in blowing through that stop sign back there, but exceeding the posted speed limit..." Several of the guys from New York tried arguing but we shut them up right away, and began assuring the Sheriff we were just on a training ride, we were sorry for blowing through the stop sign, it was a steep hill, it was a training ride, but we'd obey the law, we noted that we had several riders who were on the US Olympic Team (which was actually the case) etc. etc. and finally the Sheriff said "OK, I'll let y'all off with a warning - but don't let me *catch* you (with a wink) doing this again" and thereafter - after advising the Sheriff of our training routes and times - we never had any encounter with the Sheriff again...

    There's a way to handle encounters with police, especially in the South, and this seems to have escaped Mr Kamooneh, but if he's smart, he will figure out a different way of handling things in the future.

  219. Re: No by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

    Koch blocking?

    You have won "Comment of the Day"!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  220. Let's stop these childish arguments about quantity by FreedomFirstThenPeac · · Score: 1

    No, this just sets the precedent that outlets are not invitations to charge devices unless they are clearly marked for that use. It is simple courtesy that if someone puts out a bushel of apples with a sign that says "Free, take one", then you take one. Not two, not ten. RTFM

    --
    "There is no god but allah" - well, they got it half right.
  221. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm willing to bet that if I did, he would offer to help clean my solar panels once a year.

  222. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This same person thought it should be ok to use a neighbors water without asking when he was building his house. He's just arrogant.

  223. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the school have to press charges in order for hi to be brought up on charges

  224. De minimis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm reminded a little of this case from the UK, where a journalist trying to film a bunch of homeless people in an abandoned building stopped an alarm that they had triggered, momentarily turning on the electricity in the building in order to find the alarm switch. For his effort he was charged with "theft" of 0.003p worth of electricity Prosecutors eventually dropped the case but only after the cost to taxpayers of the prosecution had run to £5,000.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1207448/Film-maker-taken-court-stealing-0-003p--cost-5-000-taxpayer.html
    5 is about 1,000 times that amount, but still the EV owner case falls well within the bounds where "de minimis non curat lex" applies. I cannot see how this can ever be considered a useful way of spending public money.

  225. teh Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The officer might have been having a bad day, bad week or a bad month who knows...the guy was a total douche-bag to the officer and did not have to be belligerent about it...Had he just unplugged that probably would have been the end of it. Then come to find out after the investigation was done that he was told by the school that he wasn't even allowed on school property clinches it...The officer had full rights to arrest him for anything he wanted at that point. Trespassing may have been a better one but whose to argue trespassing over theft of a nickel...I mean theft is a theft right? Okay so like I said the officer had to have been having a bad week in order to carry that much hatred toward the douche bag perp. The Bottom Line, even if you think your right, and you want to defend your rights, be prepared to pay the consequences of your total actions. Which this guy was clearly in the wrong for even being there.

  226. Re:Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having heard the rest of the story as Paul Harvey so eloquently put it, this guys son does not go to the school and the guy was even told by the school that he was no longer allowed there for being belligerent to the school about it's use of the tennis courts that he was using when the officer had arrived. For that alone he could be arrested for trespassing and hopefully they added that to the charges. This guys problems actually started when he got belligerent with the Police Officer. Had he just listened to the officer and unplugged I bet we wouldn't even be reading anything about this story right now. Instead he chose to be an asshole and well these are the consequences of being an asshole in the real world. There is a difference of standing up for your rights when you are right and standing up for your rights when you are just an asshole and clearly in the wrong.

  227. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your comments are great and to the point. But to also bring to light that the guy was not welcome on school property and his son did not belong to the school was the real issue. When the officer went to the school with a picture of the guy, they told him that he was not allowed on school property for causing a disturbance at the schools tennis courts when actual students of the school went to use it supervised by the school. i.e. the guy was just a belligerent asshole to the school and the arresting officer and that is the real reason we are reading about this story.

  228. Re:Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what they infer those goods mean about you is not a great direction for us to be heading.

    Happens all of the time to conservatives out here on the Left Coast. I say turnabouts fair play.

  229. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To you, the average person is analogous to an idiot. To me, an average person, you are analogous to a male donkey.

  230. Amazing slant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It always amazes me how the report against the person and wanting him to be guilty of something will report the full name. But on the other hand, the arrest ignorant fool AKA the arresting officer, who doesn't know the difference between theft and petty theft and considers all theft the same level of crime, name is left out of the story to protect his obvious guilty criminal behavior.

    1. Re:Amazing slant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I didn't read the name at first read. My mistake. Maybe Ernesto can apologize too.

  231. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by omnichad · · Score: 1

    In fact, that little datum will in many cases prevent various corporations from ever hiring him if he ever desires to take employment with them. Frankly,that officer showed extreme lack of judgement and at the very least ought to be reprimanded.

    No, that sounds more like an extreme lack of judgement on the part of the corporations.

  232. Re:Do we need sings on each outlet in a public pla by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Do we need sings on each outlet

    I've always thought that if law enforcement needed one more thing to help it, it's musicals. The question is whether informative music or annoying music are more of a deterrent.

  233. Cops money racket by Stolzy · · Score: 1

    It wasn't until recently that I realised why this goes on in America. A friend pointed out the sheer stupidity of some of the arrests happening in USA is an extension of a money making racket the cops have (and given that most prisons over there are privately owned, I'm sure some of those arrests also come with "perks").

    So, the cops arrest someone for stealing some electricity, and if they get a fine, they get more funding. I'm pretty sure there's a lot of truth in that statement.

    /Stolzy

  234. Re:Don't expect the cop to know how much was stole by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. It sounds like he had been told by school officials not to charge his car there on multiple occasions. Yes, in any given instance the theft is small, but the cumulative annual cost of a single outlet being regularly used for charging could easily reach the $1000 range. If precedent is established that people are free to charge their cars from courtesy outlets provided with portable electronics in mind you can be pretty sure that most such EV accessible courtesy outlets will be removed. Is that really a desirable outcome?

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  235. Okay, I take you up on that by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Post your bank account details here, I and everyone else will promise not to with draw more then 5 cents a day, each and every day, everyone one of us.

    The guy in the story was an asshole repeatedly trying to charge his car for free. He didn't do it just once because his car ran down, he did it as a matter of routine. His mentality is the reason everything has to be locked up and nailed down. Because if not everything is behind lock and key some asswipe will abuse it.

    Thanks to this guy, if your electric car happens to run down, you won't find any socket available you can ask permission to use because now everyone will put a lock on the socket and have "regulations" to deal with this. All because this asshole was to cheap to charge his car at home.

    There is only one asshole here. No wait, there is the asshole from the story and you for thinking his repeated actions are okay. Or did you not read the story?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Okay, I take you up on that by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      There is only one asshole here. No wait, there is the asshole from the story and you for thinking his repeated actions are okay.

      You seem to do this quite often. If somebody is defending a given behaviour (or outraged at disproportionate punishment of such behaviour), you immediately leap to the conclusion that this person would indulge in such behaviour himself (or worse...). So now, who's the asshole here?

  236. Exactly by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    So simple yet "TheCarp" just doesn't get it. Ten to one HE is an asshole to who takes everything he can get.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Exactly by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      So what's next? Hotels suing their guests for taking left-over soap home with them at the end of their stay?

  237. Moron by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    You keep argueing your point even when a normal person would have realized by now he had none.

    The socket was made available to VISITORS of the school to charge LAPTOPS. NOT for outsiders to charge their car.

    THE VERY fact that you need a switch inside the house shows you how vile your world view is. If people just kept their paws of other peoples property you wouldn't need the switch. AND then, if someone's car ran down, saw your socket, they could charge their car, put a tenner in your mailbox with a thank you note and drive home.

    Which is the better world to live in? Yours or mine? Yours were everything needs a lock or mine were you can trust people not to abuse everything?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  238. Not really, I am hardcore socialist by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    And I think the guy was in the wrong. He can easily charge his car at home like everyone else. I just think this AC doesn't know what socialism and communism really means. It most certainly does NOT mean, grab whatever you can from public resources. Rather the opposite in fact.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  239. It is the whole commons idea by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Farmers know this, every gone past a field of corn and seen sign declaring the corn not to be fit for human consumption? It is not because 1 person stealing corn does so much damage, but a 100 people? And not all of them will take just 1 corn or care about how they trample a dozen stalks to get the one they want.

    In my youth if you were to late at the station to buy a ticket, you could buy one in the train, no problem all part of the service. Assholes like in this story ruined that because they would take a seat and then when checked would say they didn't have time to buy a ticket. Since you are not always checked you could often ride for free. So they changed the law, no more tickets sold by conductors (and fuck you if you are incapable of operating the machine) and a standard fine of 35 euro's no matter what. ALL because SOME assholes abused the system.

    My 15kg foldable bike has 5kg of locks on it, because some people just can't keep their paws to themselves.

    It is NOT about ONE guy stealing 5 cents of current, it is about the idea of taking something that doesn't belong to you.

    Do you own a petrol car? Is there a lock on petrol cap? There didn't use to be one. Used to be it was just a ordinary cap anyone could open. Then assholes started to siphon gas wherever they could and locks became after market essentials and finally standard issue.

    This kind of issue is nothing new, as said, farmers know it well, from corn to apples. 1 thief is not so bad, a thousand, and you got nothing left. If you cycle a lot, you will know that SOME people will put a tap out on hot days for passerby's to cool off and refill their water bottles. This usually lasts UNTIL an asshole comes by and totally abuses the situation by leaving a mess.

    The person from the story is described as a habitual offender, he didn't just run out of power and decided to recharge his car without asking from a public socket, he does it as a matter of routine while he has no reason to assume it is okay. He is an asshole who takes and gives nothing.

    If he walked into the office and made a single copy each day, would people claim that was okay? If he walked into the school to take a dump each day without asking, would that be acceptable?

    And ten to one all the libertards defending this guy would shoot you in the face for daring to read a map by the light streaming out of their house.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.