Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: What Was Your First Programming Language? (stanforddaily.com)

This question was inspired by news that Stanford's computer science professor Eric Roberts will try JavaScript instead of Java in a new version of the college's introductory computer programming course. The Stanford Daily reports: When Roberts came to Stanford in 1990, CS106A was still taught in Pascal, a programming language he described as not "clean." The department adopted the C language in 1992. When Java came out in 1995, the computer science faculty was excited to transition to the new language. Roberts wrote the textbooks, worked with other faculty members to restructure the course and assignments and introduced Java at Stanford in 2002... "Java had stabilized," Roberts said. "It was clear that many universities were going in that direction. It's 2017 now, and Java is showing its age." According to Roberts, Java was intended early on as "the language of the Internet". But now, more than a decade after the transition to Java, Javascript has taken its place as a web language.
In 2014 Python and Java were the two most commonly-taught languages at America's top universities, according to an analysis published by the Communications of the ACM. And Java still remains the most-commonly taught language in a university setting, according to a poll by the Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education. In a spreadsheet compiling the results, "Python appears 60 times, C++ 54 times, Java 84 times, and JavaScript 28 times," writes a computing professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology, adding "if Java is dying (or "showing its age"...) it's going out as the reigning champ."

I'm guessing Slashdot's readers have their own opinions about this, so share your educational experiences in the comments. What was your first programming language?

395 of 633 comments (clear)

  1. Fortran by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Needed it for an engineering course. My first actual programming course used PL/I

    1. Re:Fortran by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      OK, can't spell ;) lol

    2. Re:Fortran by petes_PoV · · Score: 2
      A 6-week university course using teletypes on an old IBM. After that the college switched to Multics, PL/1 and 600 Baud VDUs. So much quieter.

      I can still write FORTRAN programs in any of the many, many, languages I use today.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    3. Re:Fortran by coats · · Score: 1

      Also Fortran. Needed it for a physics course in 1969.

      --
      "My opinions are my own, and I've got *lots* of them!"
    4. Re:Fortran by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      My first one as well. I had a computer science teaching assistant ask the class what language we programmed in once. I answered, "Fortran." The whole class laughed, and she said, "No, seriously."

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    5. Re:Fortran by jmccue · · Score: 1

      Same here, FORTRAN.

    6. Re:Fortran by Megane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not quite old enough to have used FORTRAN. I grew up on BASIC and Z-80 assembly language on a TRS-80 (and a bit of HP BASIC on equipment at school), but when I went to college in 1982, they were using PL/I. The first semester was even on IBM equipment, but fortunately they got a VAX late in the semester, because I managed to screw up my JCL by trying to reformat it to be readable. I still don't know why it took DEC so long to add the UNTIL statement to their PL/I compiler.

      Then I got into programming on the Macintosh, so I started using Pascal. Also, Turbo Pascal was a thing, and they were both UCSD variants. But one of the worst things to do is use Pascal and PL/I at the same time. (as in same era, not simultaneously) The function headers are syntactically backwards to each other.

      I didn't even officially switch over to C until after 2000. I even have one program I use sometimes that started with code I originally wrote in college in PL/I, then ported to Pascal, then again ported to C.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Fortran by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      BASIC on my own, a little bit of machine language which I did not have the patience for, then FORTRAN for school.

    8. Re:Fortran by lfp98 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was competition at the time between FORTRAN and ALGOL. Physics majors learned ALGOL, which was supposed to be more humane and logical, but the engineers learned FORTRAN, with its brutal efficiency in packing the most computing into the smallest possible space - a big consideration when each line of code was hand-typed on an individual punch card. I was particularly fond of the arithmetic IF: "IF (x-y/z) 10, 15, 20" would take the program to line 10, 15 or 20 depending on whether x-y/z (or any arithmetic expression) was negative, zero or positive.

    9. Re:Fortran by niks42 · · Score: 1

      Another vote for FORTRAN. One of my sixth form friends had a father that worked at Cambridge University. We had some time on their IBM 1130, and our little club of three friends would write simple bits of code, bang them onto punch cards and watched the output tumble off the line printer.

    10. Re:Fortran by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wasn't it still called Natural Philosophy then - and taught in Latin?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Fortran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FORTRAN II via punched cards on an IBM 026

    12. Re:Fortran by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      ZX80 Basic for me, followed by ABC80 Basic then some Forth and Assembly followed by Pascal on a MicroVAX II.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    13. Re: Fortran by DThorne · · Score: 1

      https://www.amazon.com/Fortran-Watfor-Prentice-Hall-automatic-computation/dp/0133294331

      My copy of that book looks pretty much like that picture.

    14. Re:Fortran by johnw · · Score: 1

      Likewise Fortran. Then BASIC, more Fortran, various assemblers, Babbage, Pascal, C, Cobol, Ratfor, C++, Perl, Python, Ruby, JavaScript.

      Today's schoolchildren all seem to start with Scratch.

    15. Re:Fortran by mi · · Score: 1

      Yep, me too... I was in fifth grade, our new Astronomy teacher — I'm about twice older now, than she was then (darn!) — offered the class to write a program for her for extra credit (I am pretty sure now, she needed it for her own class in college).

      I took my dad's Fortran book and coded the thing up — something really simple, a loop doing something with an array... I never got to test it on anything, but I did get the extra credit...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:Fortran by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Needed it for an engineering course. My first actual programming course used PL/I

      When I started using PL/I, I thought I was really stepping up in the world. Later, I wrote a compiler for it. In Japan.

    17. Re:Fortran by Tangential · · Score: 1

      Also Fortran. In 1974 all engineering students at Ga Tech took Fortran (and learned how to create and submit punchcard decks.)

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
    18. Re:Fortran by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      My father showed me basic when I wanted to use the computer as a calculator (basic arithmetic). I discovered programming.

      He then saw talent in me and bought me a Turbo Pascal book (in my mother tongue... English would not have worked at that age) and a copy of Turbo Pascal (I presume from work, but... I don't know where exactly he got it from).

      ... and that's how he awoke my interest in computers and ultimately the profession I would choose.

      Thanks dad...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    19. Re:Fortran by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 2

      FORTRAN

      Luxury. Our computer knew Fortran but it would take an extra step to use it. We were required to use assembly. Actually, I think that was a Good Thing.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    20. Re: Fortran by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      How old do you have to be to use FORTRAN? I was unaware of any age requirement. I'm guessing you are unaware that FORTRAN is still widely in use? Google "gcc fortran", e.g.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    21. Re: Fortran by MarkH · · Score: 1

      Dude totally mirrored you up to jcl ( amdahl 9000 with cics/cobol ) afraid our way diverged when I went down Perl route.

      Still poking '10 rem' was fun using codes from back of zx81 manual?

    22. Re:Fortran by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      Apple BASIC (friend's dad was an accountant and had an AppleII+),
      FORTRAN (punch card which grd 12 physics teacher took to school board's computer at another school. Results printed out on teletype in the physics classroom.)
      PASCAL (1st year comp sci).
      assembly language (learned how shitty i86 architecture was compared to motorola 68000)
      TTL boolean logic (traffic light timing controller using car sensor input from each street, that was fun)
      SmallTalk and Forth (making "ForthTalk" for 32kB RAM BBC microcomputer) at a summer job
      PL/1, LISP, Prolog
      C++

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    23. Re:Fortran by moria6 · · Score: 1

      Fortran, HS junior year (1972). Coded on 80 column paper, sent to students at local VoTech to turn into keypunched cards, then run on the Techs time-share system. Encouraged good, debugged code up front. First language in college was Algol.

    24. Re:Fortran by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you later realized that PL/1 was roughly the worst idea in computing, ever.

      On the plus side, it did have the property. I seem to remember, that you could feed a Shakespeare sonnet into the compiler and it would compile it as a valid program.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    25. Re:Fortran by NReitzel · · Score: 1

      Yep. Fortran. IBM 7094 computer.

      --

      Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    26. Re: Fortran by coats · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Frankly, modern Fortran (F-90 or later) is a very well-structured programming language, at a higher level than (more structured than, and safer -- not as subject to buffer-overruns -- than) C: character-strings and multi-dimensional arrays are first class citizens in Fortran. And for what it's worth, I've written more than 15K lines of production Fortran in the last month...

      --
      "My opinions are my own, and I've got *lots* of them!"
    27. Re:Fortran by NReitzel · · Score: 1

      Hah! Algol was the first compiler I wrote, for CDC 6400 beast. I started life with Fortran.

      --

      Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    28. Re: Fortran by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Old enough to have not encountered a different language on a computer in your home first.

      Fortran tended not to be available on the ZX81, vic-20, C64, Spectrum, Amiga or indeed most DOS or Windows based PCs, where most people first encounter a language, let alone the variants on Logo and other weird shit taught in schools.

    29. Re:Fortran by PedroReina · · Score: 1

      Me too. At college, in a course of Numeric Analisys, Math degree, around 1980.

      Then, seftaught SuperBASIC on my Sinclair QL.

      But my first programs were on an HP-65 borrowed from a friend of mine. Just I think it does not count as a programmming language, it is not?

    30. Re:Fortran by haruchai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wasn't it still called Natural Philosophy then - and taught in Latin?

      That's COBOL

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    31. Re:Fortran by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Apple BASIC too. And then ASM. ProDOS for the Apple ][ had a hotkey that dropped to an REPL for ASM. You could do all sorts of neat things to running code.
      Most of my life I was using a bunch of fancy, popular high level languages but now everything seems to be C... even my Ruby code usually ends up being in C

    32. Re:Fortran by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Same for me initially: my first language was AppleBASIC, which I taught myself thanks to a wonderful book that almost seemed written for kids (which I was at the time). I spent endless evenings at my parent's workplace using that computer, and eventually it became mine, since I was the only one really using it. Glorious days!!!

      Fast forward a number of years, and I learned Pascal using the wonderful Turbo Pascal compile from Borland, followed shortly after by C++, followed by C (sort of an atypical learning order for most). I was in a community college, and took C++ as a self-study course, which I dove into with relish. Again, I more or less taught myself.

      At university, I learned a bit of SML, which I didn't really care for, probably because it was so different than what I was used to, and so a bit harder to pick up. Worse, it had a nearly non-existent library at the time, making the most trivial of problems extremely difficult to solve. Writing a recursive function to loop over something still seems insanely overly-complicated to this day, more suited as an academic exercise than what you'd use in a real production environment.

      As a videogame programmer, I mostly stuck with C++ for quite a few years, but eventually also learned Lua for scripting, C# for tools, and Python I learned just in the last year for my contract work, a language I enjoy very much.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    33. Re:Fortran by daq+man · · Score: 1

      I had a good laugh at this. I got my PhD in the UK and moved to the US years ago. I had to get my UK university to send a letter to my new employer in the US because my PhD certificate said "PhD in Natural Philosophy" when I'd claimed to have a PhD in Physics...

    34. Re:Fortran by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Fortran was still needed for physics in 1990. In fact, it is still needed in many subfields of physics in 2017. That was my first programming language too.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    35. Re:Fortran by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      BASIC on my own, a little bit of machine language which I did not have the patience for, then FORTRAN for school.

      I would find it instructive to have people post their ages along with their first languages... but some people might balk at that. Anyway, I'm 56.

      My first language was actually assembly - I had a high school electronics course where we put together a simple circuit board around some Motorola processor (IIRC). We had to write some simple program for the thing and be able to save (and recover) that program to/from a cassette tape. As I recall, we'd write the assembly language on paper, then convert it to octal and key that in... maybe it was hex, but I believe it was octal.

      I learned BASIC on my own, followed by FORTRAN via an advance placement program at a local university. That came in handy in college, since a lot of my engineering courses required FORTRAN (a lot of people were more or less piecing the language together in the course).

      Being able to program helped me in my first internship, since at that time it was rare for engineers to how to code - towards the end of it, coding was most of what I was doing. And, since I figured out I didn't particularly like engineering anyway, being able to code made it much easier to switch career paths early.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    36. Re:Fortran by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      Heh; FORTRAN, punched cards. I was in eighth grade or thereabouts and a friend let me run some programs on his university's 7040. Tremendous fun until I ran a program simulating a Turing machine and it printed a few hundred pages on their line printer; that got me banned.

    37. Re:Fortran by slickwillie · · Score: 1

      Same here, except I think the 026 was the keypunch machine. i was on an IBM 1620 computer. The language was actually called "WITRAN" IIRC, a subset of FORTRAN, and we ran that deck ahead of our programs.

    38. Re:Fortran by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      My first language was FORTRAN, which was a terrible first language. Then I learned BASIC, which was even worse. Then assembly, then C while unlearning a lot of bad habits from FORTRAN and BASIC. Since learning C in 1982, this is the number of times I have coded in FORTRAN: 0.

    39. Re:Fortran by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite old enough to have used FORTRAN.

      What does age have to do with anything? I took a computational linear algebra course in the late '90s that used FORTRAN nearly exclusively.

      That said, I started out, like most kids in the '80s, with BASIC and assembly language (6809 and 6502, in my case). I started college early enough that the introductory computer-science courses were still in Pascal, but pretty much every course that needed to do real work used anything but Pascal...lots of C, with a systems-programming course splitting time between 8086 assembly and VAX assembly and a database course that introduced us to SQL (of course).

      The computational linear algebra course mentioned above was a math course specifically for computer-science majors; other engineering students took a different linear-algebra course.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    40. Re:Fortran by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Same here, if you count a 2-week "course" in High School in 1970. Dropped the punch cards for my first trivial program, too, and had to re-sort them by hand.

    41. Re:Fortran by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Electronics 1981 Algol W, though I wish I had been taught C as well. Electronic Engineering learned Fortran. It was all done on punched cards at the time, though you could get hold of a terminal and play Colossal Cave if you hid from security at midnight.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    42. Re: Fortran by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Not encountered as a first language perhaps, but that is just incidental to your experience and has little to do with age. It is true that before home computers were widely available, one's first exposure to a computer language was likely to be from college, university or work, and there was a fair chance that that language would be Fortran.

      I think you are correct about the ZX-81 and the VIC-20, those machines were somewhat restricted in what they could do. Nevertheless, the C-64 had at least Abacus Fortran and ABSoft had it for the Amiga. Microsoft and Watcom had Fortran for DOS.

      Now, Windows based PCs.. that's just for gaming ;) Just kidding - there is a multitude of them, including GNU Gfortran.

      Sadly, unlike the VIC-20, ZX-81, C-64s of the time, PCs sold today to not even boot into an environment with a programming language, but that can be fixed by installing Linux or BSD.

    43. Re:Fortran by Rudisaurus · · Score: 2

      Not from Calgary, by any chance, are you? They brought in Multics in my 3rd year of engineering -- after I'd already put in 2 years of late nights in the computing centre in the basement of Math Sciences, submitting FORTRAN programs in the form of punched card decks.

      I can still read it, too; I read a paper last year with a FORTRAN subroutine printout appended and was able to pick out the transcription errors (undoubtedly made by the secretary who typed it up) which would have prevented it from compiling in the first place.

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    44. Re:Fortran by ax_johnson · · Score: 1

      I'm an engineer, too, so Fortran 77 - on a PDP-11. (Later on a VAX.)

    45. Re:Fortran by RLBrown · · Score: 1

      I am another "me, too, Fortran". I wrote my first program in September of 1969. Programs were entered on Hollerith cards, of course, and the output was a impact line printer. The workspace was 56 kilobytes. After midnight, academic work was kicked off the machine so that the accounts for a local shoe manufacturer could be run. In fullness of time, I got to use a dedicated teletype. Played a lot of Lunar Lander. In subsequent years, I moved on to HP Basic, Forth, Pascal, Perl, Java, Mathematica, Python, and as dementia slowly overtook my brain, Javascript. These days, I still do Java, Python, and Javascript. Have toyed with Swift.

      --
      -- Perhaps I see less than some, but more than many.
    46. Re:Fortran by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 2

      Fortran was still needed for physics in 1990. In fact, it is still needed in many subfields of physics in 2017.

      You are right that it is used still. Happily/sadly (depending on your perspective) there's a "new" version of Fortran coming out soon called Fortran 2015 (coming out mid-2018 because it takes this long to write the first program since its release).

      I never understood why c++ is not used for serious physics calculations given how much easier it is to write stuff, but there are people who are very sure that Fortran is superior to anything else. I just wish that Fortran would have a good way to print out results so you can see what is being calculated properly!

    47. Re:Fortran by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Apple Basic, in grade 7 on the local school's Apple II's. Then I learned 6502 machine code (yes, wrote out assembly code, then converted it to op-codes to type in manually, yay having no money!). Lather, rinse, repeat on the Commodore 64.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    48. Re:Fortran by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

      Fortran at high school (on an IBM 360 and later an IBM 1130) and then again at university. I never had to do PL/1 though.

    49. Re: Fortran by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, doesn't surprise me that it was available for those early home computers, but few people would buy/acquire it - they had access to basic just by booting up, and most people went straight to assembly in some form to exploit the full capacity of the device.

    50. Re:Fortran by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Same here. As well as 8085 assembly

    51. Re:Fortran by lfp98 · · Score: 1

      No, but had it been, I would have been prepared, having taken 4 years of Latin at my Catholic high school.

    52. Re:Fortran by miller701 · · Score: 1

      Yup. Fortran 77 on IBM PCs, late 80's

    53. Re:Fortran by chazubell · · Score: 1

      I was in in high school all we had was a punch card machine, with a printer and card reader connected to via modem to the Brooklyn College IBM 360 mainframe. So to say the least turn around was not the best. My choice in languages were FORTRAN, COBOL or RPG. I chose FORTRAN. The year after I graduated, the school received a PDP 16. :-(

    54. Re:Fortran by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      FORTRAN IV in 1967 for the introduction to programming course, followed in 1970 by 360 assembler and PL/I. BASIC and APL for non-coursework.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    55. Re:Fortran by Grampa+John · · Score: 1

      Yes, Fortran and punched cards. Learned it for a Numeric Analysis course in 1967. We could turn in "coding sheets" and have the keypunch people in the back room make the cards, or we could claim one of the keypunch machines in the back of the EE building for a few hours. Bad idea to drop your cards, especially if you had not thought to add sequence numbers to them (columns 73-80, as I recall). Took 12-24 hours to get your printout back, so you had to get good at debugging by inspection. That's a very useful skill, one that many of the younger folks have not developed very well.

    56. Re:Fortran by tedcloak · · Score: 1

      Yep. Fortran IV, I think it was. Univ of Wisconsin, summer '65. Learned it to analyze my field data (anthro, Trinidad). I had so much fun with it I considered changing from anthro to computer science, but my then wife would have killed me -- and she would have been fully justified.

    57. Re:Fortran by gary_johnson_53 · · Score: 1

      Fortran. I wrote my first program in 15 minutes. It took me 3 hours to keypunch it.

    58. Re:Fortran by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Fortran II, WatFor (teaching version), BASIC, 8080 and PDP_11 Assembly language, C, Pascal, Modula-2, Clarion.

  2. Basic by nixer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like many from my era... It took years to undo the damage!

    1. Re:Basic by mdsharpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      BASIC on the Commodore 64. You could just turn it on and immediately start typing lines of code :-)

    2. Re: Basic by AReilly · · Score: 2

      ACK Basic on a TRS-80. Wasn't very long before that was swept away by Z80 assembly language though. I remember magazines of the day containing articles that included listings (can't remember if it was asm or hex) that I would diligently enter. And then debug. I don't think that reading hex opcodes is something that the youft still get to experience, more's the pity.

      Javascript is OK. It's a bit like lisp in sheep's clothing, and that goes all the way back to the beginning.

      Highschool was only more Basic I think. University started with a local dialect of Object-Pascal and a little Fortran. C came later.

      I don't think that there is enough emphasis on assembly language these days. By by the time I had graduated I had used assembly for Z-80 and 8085, 68000, NS16032, VAX, PDP-11. Maybe early SPARC. Perhaps TI DSP32010. One machine that I built myself for a project. Probably 8086 and 80286. ARMv2.

      Lisp and its decendents (everything that uses garbage collection) are OK for theory and explorartory programming. Practice is important though. You have to understand what things cost, and why.

      --
      -- Andrew
    3. Re:Basic by lorinc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too. Good memories of something that in retrospect was not that great.

    4. Re:Basic by BigZee · · Score: 2
      You bring up a very good point there. There is a second or two between hitting the on switch and being able to start coding. This was an issue that the raspberry pi was supposed to address. To a degree this is true but does not get you to that immediate prompt.

      For me, the first language was also BASIC but on a ZX-81 very quickly followed by a VIC-20. It's worth noting that with both computers, the manuals that came with them were almost totally geared toward programing immediately as well. Advanced stuff, like dealing with floppy disks, came much later if at all. The computer was a BASIC computer straight away.

      I also remember the joy after having following the instructions in the manual for a while when I started to realize that I understood what I was doing and what the computer was doing as well.

      Whilst I've done plenty of programming since and in many languages, given that my current role is a DBA, I think that learning BASIC was very useful given that most of my programming today is scripting rather than using compiled languages.

    5. Re: Basic by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they were talking about GOTO (JMP)

    6. Re:Basic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BASIC on punch tape on a Teletype 33 connected over an acoustic coupler modem to a Control Data system somewhere in the cloud.

      "Cloud" is nothing new - I was doing it in 1972.

    7. Re:Basic by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      To reply the thread, my vote is also for basic, specifically GW-Basic on the TRS-80 Colour Computer 2.

      Advanced stuff, like dealing with floppy disks, came much later if at all. The computer was a BASIC computer straight away.

      Can you imagine the reaction* of people if you took a 256GB microSD card and showed it to them? Told them about the speed of the thing?

      * to the kids out there, you'd first have to teach people of that era what a megabyte is (maybe), then explain what a gigabyte is (most probably). You could also tell them that this fingernail-sized storage device can store 256000000000** bytes or 347222 of their double-sided, 80 cylinders floppies. They would not believe you.

      ** manufacturers use power of 10, not power of 2. Get with the program already.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re: Basic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My basic had gosub #line (go to subroutine at line number, with ret keywordâ to return from subroutine). The manual was highlighting how convenient it was to be able to enter the subroutine at any point !

    9. Re:Basic by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but it's basic was so limited that if you wanted to do anything remotely interesting, you had to start messing around with assembler, either indirectly by poking around with memory locations (no pun intended), or just biting the bullet and writing it directly.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    10. Re:Basic by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Long before Basic came along, there was JOSS, my first real-time language. Being able to pull immediate graphs of research results (U of Calif) and then play what-if games with modified inputs was far more revolutionary for us than whatever it was the Students for a Democratic Society was setting fire to out in the quad. It was implemented on a new mainframe operating system that doled out tiny slices of processor time (in those days the processor was the second room on the left) on a rotating basis to each of perhaps ten users pecking away on IBM 1050 typewriter terminals. In the ten minutes or so between OS crashes, you could refine your research model a little more.

      Unfortunately, databases still lived only on card decks and open-reel tape, which in any case were only accessible to the batch programs that ran after hours. You had to initialize every element of your model's input array in code, and then manually modify it as you got results.

    11. Re:Basic by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Been there with the ASR33, but on an Alpha LSI with core memory.

      And it was Basic on that monster.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    12. Re:Basic by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Like many from my era...

      It took years to undo the damage!

      Yup. And in that respect, Python is the new BASIC.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    13. Re:Basic by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      BASIC too, on a PC XT computer with ludicrous... 1MB of RAM :-)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    14. Re:Basic by tk77 · · Score: 1

      Same here. My dad picked up a C64 from Caldor for like $200 and taught me BASIC on it when I was 7. I remember learning new things/tips from RUN magazine then passing them back on to him as he was writing a custom stamp collection program.

    15. Re:Basic by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Also basic.

      Man - what's wrong with python? I haven't written in it in years, but I sure thought it was a fine language at the time...

    16. Re:Basic by Meneth · · Score: 1

      GW-BASIC on DOS 3.

    17. Re:Basic by jiriw · · Score: 1

      I became interested in computers when I was about 8. The ZX Spectrum was relatively new at that time and a very good family friend bought one. My father soon followed suite. Of course BASIC was therefore my first experience in programming. Most of it was extremely amateurish :P It was only when I finished primary education (usual age of 12) and went to high school (or similar to that for my region of the world) I first experienced a PC. It took a lot of convincing to get my dad to buy a 486SX-25 PC with a VGA monitor. I soon 'upgraded' to Turbo Pascal and did my first serious programming in it, among other things, using the graphics mode to render fractals. I also did some stuff in Delphi, which is Borland Pascal for Windows. I don't think I had any problems grasping the functional concepts... At the end of my Basic 'career' I already used gosub extensively to partition and re-use fragments of code of my own accord...

      When I started living on my own (second year in college, 1996?) I bought an IBM Cyrix pentium-class PC, got interested in Linux and swapped to C(++) for most of my programming.

      Nowadays, I call myself a programming language agnostic. Programming languages are tools and when I start a project, I mostly look at the prerequisites, if they necessitate a certain language because of legacy code or the platform the software will be deployed upon. Else if I have a primary say in the language used, I pick one I'm familiar with, and there are dozens to pick from. Only language concept I may want to improve myself with, I think is functional languages... haven't done enough coding with those...

      In projects I work on and for maintenance stuff, I'm currently using (in order of most used) C#, Golang, C++, PHP, Java(android), Objective C and Python. And if you consider them programming languages, Bash scripting and SQL.

    18. Re:BASIC by campuscodi · · Score: 1

      Me too. Learned it in the 5th grade.

    19. Re: Basic by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Then MS basic on the C64. Some more MS basic on an Apple II. MS basic again on the Amiga.

      Curious. You used MS basic instead of the natively available Commodore Basic or Applesoft Basic?

    20. Re:Basic by danomac · · Score: 1

      I had a TRS80 as well, learned some BASIC. Found out it was pretty easy to write BASIC, but it was also easy to use more memory than the device had. Had that for about 5 years until we got our 386SX based PC, where I started out using Pascal.

      In high school they had Pascal and hypercard, from what I remember. Post-secondary introduced me to C/C++ and assembler. I still remember hooking int13h with assembler on my PC and accidentally roasting the partition tables and other bits rendering my machine (and some recent not backed up schoolwork) useless. It was then I learned use a spare PC for experimenting... ;-)

      Unfortunately I'm really rusty, last time I did any sort of coding was when I had to fix Highpoint's Rocketraid driver after a kernel ABI change (maybe 10 years ago?), and Highpoint didn't seem interested in fixing it at all.

    21. Re:Basic by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Delphi, which is Borland Pascal for Windows

      No. Borland Pascal was a rebrand of Turbo Pascal and was object oriented.

      Delphi introduced Class and was a much stronger OO language. Syntactically it had a lot of overlap with Borland Pascal but it was very clearly a different language.

      I programmed professionally in both. Delphi was an interesting deviation from what I'd done before; Delphi 2 really just stepped away in 'never coming back' way.

    22. Re: Basic by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      He's probably referring to the fact that CBM BASIC is a Microsoft BASIC dialect.

    23. Re: Basic by AntiSol · · Score: 2

      I assume that the parent means "built-in basic" on both machines.

      CBM BASIC was MS 6502 BASIC under the hood. The C128 even included a Microsoft copyright message. There is an easter egg in basic v2 on the PET which displays "Microsoft!" on the screen. The story goes that Bill Gates had an argument with Jack Tramiel and wanted to be able to prove that it was MS basic.

      See here and here

      According to the first link, the basic on the Apple II was called integer basic and was written by Woz. Though MS basic was available on tape and built into the Apple II Plus.

    24. Re:Basic by J053 · · Score: 1

      BASIC on the Dartmouth Time Sharing System in 1972 (teletype machine - at least it wasn't punch cards). Then FORTRAN (that was on punch cards), followed by C, Pascal, LISP, etc...

    25. Re:Basic by freya_bacchus · · Score: 1

      BASIC on commodore vic-20

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity!
    26. Re:Basic by choovanski · · Score: 1

      My nephew is pushing the boundaries of what can be accomplished with Scratch. It was my intent to get him into Python next but what would you suggest instead?

    27. Re:Basic by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I would suggest Python. Whatever language he learns next (with the possible exception of Scheme or Haskell) will require a lot of unlearning in the future. He is better off unlearning Python's bad habits than (say) JavaScript's.

      I wouldn't give up the time I had with Basic, either.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    28. Re:Basic by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      There are several things wrong with Python, but the main thing that it has in common with Basic is that it's impossible in general to tell what a program means by looking at the source text. You can only tell by running it.

      Even JavaScript gets that correct.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    29. Re:Basic by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      10 CLS
      20 PRINT "YEP, BASIC ON A TRS-80 WITH ONLY CAPS AVAILABLE"
      30 GOTO 20

      Loved simple languages and only 4K of RAM.

    30. Re:Basic by retiarius · · Score: 1

      edsgar dijkstra rules! so glad I learned SNOBOL first, so I didn't get dane bramage.

    31. Re: Basic by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      I remember testing recursion on IBM Advanced Basic, and finding it would fail even a simple case (think Tower of Hanoi) at a depth of about 32.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    32. Re:Basic by naris · · Score: 1

      My first language was IBM VS BASIC on CP/CMS on an IBM 360 mainframe in middle school. Then I graduated to Integer BASIC on an Apple ][ then Applesoft BASIC on an Apple ][+ and 6502 assembler & Z-80/8080 assembler. Then GW-BASIC, Turbo Pascal and C on IBM and other PCs -- COBOL & PL/1 on MVS. Back to the PC for C++ on Windows 3.1 & OS/2 for awhile before moving to unix shell scripts, Perl, Java, JavaScript, etc...

    33. Re:Basic by eeyore · · Score: 1

      ... on a DEC-10!

      Most of my programs were stored on punched paper tape!

    34. Re:Basic by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 1

      IIRC computers then were for programming or automation. Now they're for running programs or apps.

      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
    35. Re:Basic by cshark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but unless you had a tape drive or disk installed, debugging was a bitch.
      It was my first language and platform too.

      Professionally, the first thing I worked in was Visual Basic 5.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    36. Re:BASIC by snax · · Score: 1

      Yup. Basic in high school, Pascal in college, then LISP and assembly. Then I switched majors to Math :)

  3. Basic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Had a TRS80 model 1

  4. Fortan by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    On punch cards

    1. Re:Fortan by gtall · · Score: 1

      Same here. Then they moved to RatFor (Rational Fortran). But we also covered Snobol (loved that language), APL (wild), LISP, CDC Assembly, and more I've forgotten.

      Later on I was exposed to Scheme. It was okay but I quickly grew to detest the Scheme adherents. Now I'm picking up Haskell, a bit like APL in the way the functions chain together.

  5. Basic by Chardros · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of course.

  6. TI-57 by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Not sure that language has a name, though.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  7. Rust by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have only used Rust. The other languages excluded me.

  8. Showing my age... by fwc · · Score: 2
    Basic on an Apple II....and pretty much every other computer at that point. That pretty much was the choice for learning how to program back in the mid-80's.

    I also picked up Pascal and C shortly thereafter. C stuck, Pascal didn't. I seem to remember learning COBOL and PL/I at some point, along with a bit of fortran.

    I've learned so many languages over the years, that I've lost count. Right now I have active projects going in C, HTML5/Javascript, and Python. It's gotten to the point where another language isn't a big deal: it's more about learning libraries than the language itself.

    Java ranks near the top of my list in languages I prefer not to program in if I can avoid it.

    1. Re:Showing my age... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Basic on an Apple II....and pretty much every other computer at that point. That pretty much was the choice for learning how to program back in the mid-80's.

      Logo for the Apple II was popular at my middle school at that time. I didn't like the class because I found out I came from a "poor" family that couldn't afford an Apple ][ and didn't get cable for MTV. We went from just being kids to kids with socioeconomic identifiers.

    2. Re:Showing my age... by naris · · Score: 1

      I'll see your Apple][ BASIC and raise you IBM VS BASIC on a teletype to an IBM 360 running VM/CMS. Then Apple ][ Integer BASIC then ][+ Applesoft BASIC...

  9. Starting teaching myself in 2007 with... by TFlan91 · · Score: 1

    JavaScript, then PHP, SQL, then python, then C++

    True millennial

  10. BASIC by mschaefer4193 · · Score: 1

    As a 6 year old I started to teach myself BASIC on a Sharp MZ-80A. Many years later I learned Pascal at school.

  11. CHIP-8 by jabberw0k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First computer was an RCA VIP, January 1977 (the TRS-80 and Apple ][ hadn't been introduced yet). To program the VIP, you flipped the RUN/RESET switch up while holding the 'C' key on the hex heypad, then '0' to write memory, then the four-digit address, then entered your hex codes. You had better have written your program out on paper ahead of time. Clear screen was 00E0. After awhile you could read programs just by looking at the hexdump. A lost art.

    1. Re:CHIP-8 by bjhavard · · Score: 1

      Wow, I thought I'd be the only one who'd have this answer. I learned CHIP-8 on an Electronics Australia kit computer called the DREAM 6800. Can't say I remember any of the op-codes but I do remember that instructions were all 2 bytes long. The computer itself had a hex keypad plus a few extra keys, 1kB RAM and a 64x32 pixel display.

  12. Sinclair Basic on a zx80 by SniffTheGlove · · Score: 1

    Sinclair Basic on a zx80

    1. Re:Sinclair Basic on a zx80 by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      This was my first computer too! The keyboard was terrible, I'm still scarred by it to this day, and you'd make 4 tape backups because most would fail to read back. I had the 16K expansion pack, so you know I was legit.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  13. GWBasic by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    Having an interpreter appear automatically when you press ctrl-C while playing a game is pretty nice. Too bad that things are less accessible that way today.

    1. Re:GWBasic by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      GWbasic, 8086, with all of the esoteric peek and poke nonsense, without a lick of comprehension.

      Then Turbo Pascal, then why is Pascal so much faster, then a failed attempt to compile and link GWbasic.

      Then C, where you can effectively peek and poke all you want. And K&R finally taught me what I was doing.

      Learning the hard way is not efficient, so university will try a different path. I don't trust the results of that path unless they have an origin story that starts with curiosity. Then the language used is irrelevant.

  14. BASIC, of course by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    Sinclair ZX Spectrum BASIC, specifically. Self-taught from the book that came with every Spectrum.

    Later came Pascal (in college), then after a semester of Pascal they switched to C, skipping the basics of C to go straight into second-semester concepts. That spoiled programming for me for a long time.

    These days it's XSLT, Windows cmd, Autohotkey and the occasional bit of Python in a mostly non-programming job.

    1. Re:BASIC, of course by lordlod · · Score: 1

      XSLT, dear god.

      Does your workplace include nets on the stairs?

    2. Re:BASIC, of course by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Most of the work I do is processing XML documents. Why not use XSLT for that?

    3. Re:BASIC, of course by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Converting one XML document into another (often an FO document) is easier via Perl than via XSLT?

    4. Re:BASIC, of course by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Most certainly not.
      But it would be nice if we had transformation languages foe XML, thatwould not be XLM(XSLT) themself.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:BASIC, of course by Szeraax · · Score: 1

      Ugh, I was too lazy to login, but I guess I should or something.

    6. Re:BASIC, of course by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip, I'll look into it.

  15. Basic of course by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    When I grew up the C64 had Basic built into the CLI, so that was the obvious way to start experimenting. But when I later moved over to x86 architecture things started to get a bit messy. I had a short fling with QuickBasic, but quickly needed something more advanced and moved to TurboPascal for a while. Needing more speed I then overcompensated going full x86 asm, which was fun and very helpful for my later career in terms of experience and understanding the hardware. But not very productive, so C/C++ became the middle ground. And there I have stayed since.

  16. Basic by Chatterton · · Score: 1

    On a Sharp PC 1500A.

  17. C and C++ by aglider · · Score: 1

    C for servers and tools, c++ for web applications (using libwt).
    I would use C alone if there were a web framework for it.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:C and C++ by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Can you explain why?

      I simply don't get why any sane person would chose C over C++

      Especially considering the context, libwt ... WTF, how do you want to replace something as fine as that with pure C code? That does not make any sense at all!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re: C and C++ by aglider · · Score: 1

      Easy.
      1. Why not?
      2. I like full control and responsibility
      3. Why not (again)?

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    3. Re: C and C++ by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Full controll about what?
      So you prefer to be unproductive like 1/3rd of the speed you have when working with C over having a high and easy productivity when working with C++? That is beyond me ....

      Sorry, your answer makes no sense. It sounds like a C++ hater who has jo idea what he is hating. But don't feel onlieged to give a more sensual answer.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re: C and C++ by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

      I like FULL control...that's why I still program everything in ASSEMBLY. Can't have that fancy smancy compiler pushing an extra register on the stack that I know is not going to change within my function. That is a couple lost CPU cycles that I will never get back...now get off my lawn... Seriously, though I prefer C++ over most other languages (I've used about 20 over my career) because of its speed and control characteristics. But I do a lot of low-level programming, so what do I know?

    5. Re: C and C++ by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Compilers don't usually push an extra register on the stack.
      Why would they? Erm, why would the compiler writer?

      Programming in assembly means you are litteraly 100 times less productive than a C++ programmer.

      Deal with it, and get of my lawn ;)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re: C and C++ by aglider · · Score: 1

      Full controll about what? So you prefer to be unproductive like 1/3rd of the speed you have when working with C over having a high and easy productivity when working with C++? That is beyond me ....

      Sorry, your answer makes no sense. It sounds like a C++ hater who has jo idea what he is hating. But don't feel onlieged to give a more sensual answer.

      You'd better read more carefully, dude!
      I do use C++ for web applications. That's about 80% of my code.
      For tools (CLI) and server (TCP+CLI) I still prefer C as I get full control of the program with libuv (events), liblfds (containers), jemalloc (better memory management) and little more.
      As all the rest is just application logic that is more or less the same in C++ and in C.
      But, please, don't feel obliged to give more nonsensical counter-comments. I won't give those a damn!
      The language of choice, to me, is a mix of religious beliefs, comfortable usage and programming habits. But that'd be just me. Not you.

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    7. Re: C and C++ by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I was just wondering. Because I hear this control thing so often and then the programmers make lots of "un true" comments about what is wrong with C++ and why they don't use it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re: C and C++ by aglider · · Score: 1

      If you had really read my comment, I'd have known that I had not expressed any comment against C++.
      I simply prefer C and use C++ to get advantage of Wt.
      That's it.
      Of course, you can write whatever you want, accuse whoever you want for whatever programming crime you want.
      I will go on not giving it a damn!

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    9. Re: C and C++ by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I appologize if you missunderstood my question.
      Obviously you are giving a damn ...

      Anyway, I really wonder why would one who has a C++ compiler by default on his computer woukd use C's I/O or strung library when he can use C++ ...

      But perhaps you wanted to say you use only the C subset of C++ and a little bit of its libraries ... I don't know, hence I asked.

      db <- my newly invented smily for namaste / sawadee khrab.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  18. SmartBASIC by quetwo · · Score: 1

    Started learning with SmartBASIC on an Adam/Coleco. Moved up to Apple's Basic on the Apple IIGS, then Apple Assembler.

    When I got a PC, I did some BASIC, then moved on to PASCAL (and took some formal PASCAL classes in high-school), then C++ in college. Learned Perl along the way. Picked up Java at my first job out of college. My second job out of college I learned ActionScript. Now days I do mostly Java and C++.

    I really hope they continue to teach a typeful language. Learning things like memory management, threading, etc. are all important in CS classes. These are the things that will make a developer much more rounded -- instead of chasing the latest hot language.

  19. 10 GOTO 50 by MacTO · · Score: 2

    30 goto 20
    20 goto 40
    50 goto 30
    60 print "HELLO BASIC, OLD FRIEND!"

    Huh. Why doesn't my program work?

    In all seriousness, I started with BASIC at home and later did a bit with it in middle school. High school was Pascal based, and my university started with C. (There were many languages in between, but since the summary is focusing on schooling ...)

  20. Logo by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

    Many thanks to a progressive Dutch primary education system.

    --
    Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    1. Re:LOGO by lucasnate1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I really liked the logo translations. As a child it was very useful to be able to program in hebrew, when my english was developing.

    2. Re:Logo by tonique · · Score: 1

      OOh, I forgot Logo! I actually used PowerLogo on Amiga for a while.

    3. Re:LOGO by dthirteen · · Score: 1

      First exposure was basic but I wasn't programming just typing. really taught myself to program in Logo with conditionals, loops, procedures in 7th or 8th grade. And then Pascal and ADA in college.

    4. Re:Logo by hattig · · Score: 1

      Indeed back in the 90s Logo was what was taught at school for the introductory stuff - the visual feedback made it work very well. Sadly most lessons didn't really teach why things worked, just what to do to draw pictures.

      My educational route would have been BASIC (at home), Logo, Pascal, [university:] ML, Modula-3 and then Java.

    5. Re:Logo by gwolf · · Score: 1

      How come this one came in so late in the thread?!
      Before any (OK, modulo two or three that surely did but that I don't know about) actual schools introduced computers for kids in my country (1985), I went to a computing introduction class during a Summer break. We learned Logo for four hours a day (on Apple //e), for three or four weeks. I *loved* it.
      Later during that same year, I took several classes at another computing institute, and there I used BASIC on Commodore.
      Got me hooked. And here I am, over thirty years later, unable to quit Slashdot... Should I sue for damages?

    6. Re:LOGO by gwolf · · Score: 1

      YES. Same here. I learned Logo in Spanish. Only some time later I found that CAMINA was FORWARD, DERECHA was RIGHT, and so on.

    7. Re:LOGO by Arab · · Score: 1

      Same I learned Logo in Arabic then transitioned to English.

    8. Re: LOGO by locoluis · · Score: 1

      LCSI Atari LOGO in Spanish was my first. It used a slightly different translation: AV RE DE IZ

      I could even change the shape of the turtle to an 8x16 sprite.

    9. Re:Logo by ketomax · · Score: 1

      Logo here in India too back in 1996

  21. LOGO. Grade school, I think fourth or fifth grade. Version horribly translated in my language.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  22. Pascal by jonwil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I was a kid I had exposure to Basic and LOGO and a few other things but the first real programming I actually did would have been in Pascal (Turbo Pascal 6 if I remember correctly). These days most of my coding is in C and C++.

    The most obscure thing I have ever programmed in would probably be assembly language for the 65816 CPU (an enhanced 16 bit version of the famous 6502 CPU). The main claim to fame for the 65816 was as the CPU in the Apple IIGS and also the CPU in the Super Nintendo (SNES ROM hacking is where I learned 65816 ASM)

    1. Re:Pascal by MatiasKiviniemi · · Score: 1

      Same here and I still remember Pascal fondly. Also my first experience in professional programming was Delphi 4, which was essentially "RAD Pascal" (and a hugely advanced and modern environment).

    2. Re:Pascal by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

      I had similar experience. But, on much older hardware. My first formally taught language was Pascal, in college. On the engineering school mainframe.
      I taught myself Basic in my mid teens in the mid '70s. On the school district mainframe using an acoustic modem and a teletype.

    3. Re:Pascal by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      I do NOT remember what was my first programming language; but, Pascal was likely it. The first language I really wrote programs of moderate size in was Ada. Tim S.

    4. Re: Pascal by stinkyjak · · Score: 1

      Turbo Pascal on win95 was my first. More than 30 languages of exposure, later I still do not understand why this was the teaching language chosen for the class in 1997.

    5. Re:Pascal by ventsyv · · Score: 1

      Turbo Pascal here as well. I think they should still teach that as a first language, very consistent language and the english-like structure makes the code extremely readable and easy to follow for a beginner.

  23. Two separate questions by call+-151 · · Score: 1

    There are two separate questions with different answers brought up here:

    1. What language did you first learn?
    2. What is a good first language for people now?

    For me:

    1. FORTRAN on punch cards
    2. Sure, let's bring up a prime Holy War issue, I'm sure we'll have great productive discussion about it!
    --
    It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
    1. Re:Two separate questions by info6568 · · Score: 1

      You are right this has two questions inside. And there are hundreds of answers.

      In my case, my first language was GW-Basic on a Tandy 1000 SX my parents purchased to my brother that was studying Electronic Engineering in the University. As many others, nobody taught me ... this was just test and error. Later, when I came to study Informatics in the University (was not my first career), the used a Spanish Logo-Writer version. And it was very interesting, because of the type of language ... you needed to figure how to make loops with recursion, an interesting way to approach the problem in a first programming course. Later we went with Turbo Pascal, a marvelous language for learning, and then C.

      I think that two good languages to start learning are C and C++. Why?

      • Many languages follow their programming style.
      • They force you to be careful, to make a good design and to apply it (is not this the sense of learning anything?)
      • You can make your machine to sing and dance with them.
      • There are thousands of libraries that can help you to arrive to any corner in the knowledge landscape.
      • There are 100% free versions you can use to learn on extremely cheap machines.
      • Strong typing. Be ordered, do things well.

      .

      What I don't think is a good idea?

      Garbage Collector based languages. Remember, this is about "learning", and these languages hide many things are important to take into consideration when you are in your formation days.

      Heavy framework based languages. What are you learning, programming or to use a particular framework? These are different things. There are frameworks in C++ but they are even optional to use and you can design your own hierarchy of classes. Be creative.

      Particular machine's behavior. This is similar to the framework stuff. Better go with open standards that permit you to approach many different platforms. Learn about the "computer", not about "that computer".

      And could be better if what you are using give you the capacity to create concurrent systems. It is very important in 2017 to learn about that when even the smaller machine has several cores or works with concurrent operating systems. This can be done with language constructions or with libraries.

  24. Fortran by daq+man · · Score: 1

    I wrote my first code at high school in about 1976 in Fortran.

    There were no computers at school so the code was written by shading in little ovals on each of a stack of cards using a soft pencil. The cards were sent to a college that had a mainframe. The cards were read and used to generate a stack of punched cards that were returned the next day. You then inspected the cards to see if they correctly coded what you wanted them to code. If not the card was "edited" by covering incorrect holes with tape and punching new ones with a hand held punch. The cards were then sent back overnight to be re-read, and this time an attempt at compilation and execution was made. If you were lucky you got a printout from a line printer with the result of your code. If you were unlucky there was a syntax error and the cards had to be re-edited. Running "Hello World" could take several days with each step of the process requiring sending the cards to the college and getting the results back the next day.

  25. C & C++ by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 2

    The first languages which I used to write properly-speaking programs were C and C++, when studying mechanical engineering at the university. Theoretically, I firstly used Basic in high school, but what we were doing back then cannot be called programming. My career as a programmer started some years later working as a mechanical engineer and with Fortran.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    1. Re:C & C++ by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Logo. Even though I don't really count that as "true programming".

      My first language was really two languages, C and x86 assembler. I took a C programming course on a whim when I was in college and discovered I had a natural knack for it. I wanted to know more so at the same time got a bunch of books on assembler. By the end of the semester I had written an anti-virus program.

      The next semester I took a course on OpenGL and ended it with a 2D-3D graphing calculator.

      Ah memories...late night coding sessions in the old college computer lab. Those were the days. :)

      --
      ~X~
    2. Re:C & C++ by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      Ah memories...late night coding sessions in the old college computer lab. Those were the days. :)

      Our lives are inversely related: I am currently doing the long coding sessions; at college, I wasn't too much into programming (although always liked it). BTW, my first Basic experiences weren't actual programming not just because of being a crappy language, but also because of really not doing anything relevant (even before high school with a cassette Sinclair Spectrum).

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    3. Re:C & C++ by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      As far as many people aren't just talking about their first languages, I clarify that I currently don't use much any of the aforementioned ones. Most of my programming work since various years ago has been focused on .NET (C# & VB.NET desktop and web), PHP (a bit of JavaScript), VBA/Office macros, VB6, Java, some C-based (a bit of C, a bit of Perl, a bit of C++, etc.), etc.

      In fact, using a given programming language isn't precisely a problem to me because of my experience (+ being quite good at learning); and, mainly, because most of my work is focused on efficiency-concerned algorithms and I rarely use too fancy programming features, what makes most of my code quite similar in different languages (loops, conditions, methods, basic collections, some not-too-complex lambdas, etc.).

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  26. LOGO by fadethepolice · · Score: 3, Informative

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... But I quickly switched to Basic as that was the language in all the magazines.

  27. Borland Turbo Pascal .. by burni2 · · Score: 1

    .. of course. Such a clean and slick language, that made fumbling with the PCs-hardware very easy.

    I use it till today to talk to the ISA/TTL Bus on DOS.

  28. 1st language by stanbrown · · Score: 1

    C That says it all had to add this nonsens because of posting filter

    --
    nix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ~
  29. Does machine code count? by ukoda · · Score: 1

    I started with 6800 machine code as I was using a Motorola D2 copy I had build and it had hex key pad for input and 6 digit 7seg LED display for output, so it was not like you could use something fancy like an assembler.

  30. BASIC on a TRS-80 clone by rafaelgcpp765 · · Score: 1

    I first learn BASIC on a TRS-80 clone, then moved to my own ZX81 clone, where I started programming Z-80 assembly. After a few years, I upgraded to a MSX computer, where I learned Pascal and C. The most important thing I learned was algorithms and data structures. BASIC in those three platforms are so different, that, unless you understood the algorithms, porting programs was not straight forward.

  31. AGOL W by blackpaw · · Score: 1

    On punch cards. We had to post them from our country school to a data center in the nearest town (Invercargill) who would run them and post the output back. Turn around for bug fixes was a week.

    1. Re:AGOL W by no-body · · Score: 1

      Algol on 5 channel punch tape TTY on Zuse

    2. Re:AGOL W by MrMr · · Score: 1

      ..Turn around for bug fixes was a week...
      Sounds great, do they still provide that service?

  32. PL/1 by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

    FORTRAN was offered only to engineering students; everyone else took PL/1

    --
    Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    1. Re:PL/1 by arth1 · · Score: 1

      FORTRAN was offered only to engineering students; everyone else took PL/1

      No ALGOL or COBOL where you were?

    2. Re:PL/1 by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      No ALGOL or COBOL where you were?

      Not in the first course offered at my end of campus. Not sure what the business folks offered. The second course in the intro sequence introduced a number of different languages. Not being a CS major, I only took the first course.

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
  33. C and C++ and sometimes Assembly by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    The other languages are for pussies.

  34. 8080 ASM by Mrrrrrrr · · Score: 1

    8080 ASM But of course I only wrote software on paper as it would be several years before I could get a machine to actually, you know, run it.

  35. FOCAL-69 by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    Summer school course at Wellesley Middle School. A Teletype connection to BBN in Cambridge. I would have been 15.

  36. In 1964 ... by argee · · Score: 1

    Fortran II on an IBM 6020, puched cards; then IBM 7044 also punched cards. On microcomputers, Altair 8800, I used
    8080 Assembler, Z80 Assembler, Altair Mits BASIC (by Bill Gates), then dBase II under cp/m 1.4 and 2.2. Those
    were the days, noisy machines, teletypes, chain printers (scary!), and *lots* of blinking lights: incandescents too,
    not LED's like later. Today I use mostly Bash Scripting with extensions for hardware manipulation.

    A quick comment on BASIC. The disadvantage of Basic is sphagetti code due to GOTO's. The Advantage of
    Basic is that it *has* GOTO statements. If you want to try some real sphagetti code, try 8080 assembler! But
    both *can* be elegant.

  37. Basic, on a ASR-33 Teletype. by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

    CRT terminals were still in the future. Later; FORTRAN, PDP-11 machine code, Forth, and various flavors of assembly language. It was really a big deal when Turbo Pascal was released.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  38. Academic: FORTRAN Work: Assembly by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    I learned programming at university using the FORTRAN language, picked up Basic on my own later when one of the engineering profs bought a Data General Nova on his own dime so we'd get some "minicomputer" experience. But my first job required assembly programming on a military Univac 1218. I loved that thing (then), because it was so computery: every register was displayed on the front panel and you could set/clear the bits by pushing the light button, and when it ran, they all flashed. Very very cool. Programmed the thing with punched cards. The assembler was multipass, dumping the cards off to 9-inch reels of mag tape (also very computery) and making the passes through that. So the whole experience was this blinking, tape spinning, card reading, huge printer printing experience and DEAR GOD IT WAS BEAUTIFUL. It was like I had stepped into a '50s era scifi movie and it was all in my control, mwaaaaahahahaha. So, you know, just your average day in paradise for an engineering newbie.

  39. Re:Hypercard! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Hypercard then TI-BASIC.

  40. Java is like something outof a zombie movie by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    It simply refuses to die.. even when it's dead.

    --
    John_Chalisque
    1. Re:Java is like something outof a zombie movie by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      It simply refuses to die.. even when it's dead.

      Well, it always did have lousy garbage collection... :-)

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  41. Apple ][ by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Apple Soft Basic, only messed around with INTEGER Basic to 'patch' some games.
    6502 assembly and Sweet 16
    Atztec C ... still on an Apple ][, never relly understood that types basically were completely ignored, error messsages were a pain in the ass. But I learned about the tool chain you need(ed) for 'real programming'.
    Pascal, then Modula 2
    Then around 1988, 'better C' (wrote some GUI stuff in C for OpenView connecting some Prolog programs to each other)
    Quickly later I switched from Pascal on Macs to a subset of C++ (Think C, later bought by Symantec) and to CFront based C++ on Suns.
    Around that time I worked mainly in Unix, with various shells and Perl. On the Mac I learned 68k assembly, because I always thought I could make the Think C virtual message dispatch faster ...
    Because of study requirements I learned Prolog and Lisp and SQL.
    Later SPARC and PowerPC assembly ... never seriously used it and have forgotten everything.
    Then Acorn Risc basic on my Archimedes, and ARM assembly (that opcode set I really like, and ofc. 68k is such a nice architecture)
    On PC I switched to Borland and Symantec C++, on Macs I sticked to Think C/Symantec C++, on Unix I mainly was working on scripts.
    Meanwhile my 'private' programming is mainly Groovy and a bit Scala. My professional programming is usually Java.
    I guess I forgot plenty of languages :) as I e.g. did P/L1 and COBOL in Y2k reengineering, but never learned enough of them to write a program from scratch.
    Of course I did lots with HyperCard / AppleScript.

    For beginners I think Groovy and Python are excellent languages. Java I would probably only teach with stuff like Blue/J. And: there is still 'Free Pascal'. Pascal is probably the best language for teaching that ever was invented!

    When I have a bit free time I will start learning Swift and make some small Apps, that I have ideling in my mind since quite some time.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  42. Comal 80 by Mysund · · Score: 1

    Comal 80 in the 80's

  43. TCL by jrq · · Score: 1

    on a PDP-11

    --
    My UID is prime!
  44. Mine was Scheme, then C by utahjazz · · Score: 1

    Should have been C or assembly. They way I was taught, which is how I think it should be taught, you start with transistors and work your way up. Logic gates, circuits, integrated circuits, assembly, compilers, high-level languages. C lets you see how the language is integrating to the hardware below it. You have registers, heap memory and a stack, interrupts, pointer arithmetic. Python et al are all just theory. C is reality. From there, you can move up to learning high-level things.

    I'm not saying C is the best language. I'm saying it's the best first language.

    1. Re:Mine was Scheme, then C by zeke7237 · · Score: 1

      heh .. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Languages, at the U? :) I thought that was an awesome course .. I already had a few under my belt by that time, but learning a lisp-y language taught me a lot of useful things

  45. Locomoive Basic by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    It came on the Amstrad CPC, and you needed to type commands like run"monty just to run your games. Magazines had type-ins and 'pokes' and so on.Back then there was nowhere to hide from the need to at least know how to type 10 print "hello"... 20 goto 10... run.

    --
    John_Chalisque
  46. Re:Old people will probably say BASIC by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    It's hard to ignore it when it's embedded in the computer boot ROM

    ...and it is hard to compile Pascal or C when your mass storage is a 300 bps audio cassette tape recorder, and you only have 4K of RAM (which was the main fallacy of the BASIC-haters at the time, when a floppy controller and drive cost twice as much as your original computer).

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  47. MLS - Machine Language Simulation by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Filling out bubble cards for an IBM 1160 - ca. 1977. Program printouts came back two days later.

    Teacher was a drunk the administration couldn't fire, most kids used the class to a) socialize or b) make pictures out of different letters. I remember a particularly impressive Corvette logo.

    My proudest achievement was figuring out how to program multiplication/division as repeated addition/subtraction. All by myself, just using the manual.

  48. 6502 by NCG_Mike · · Score: 1

    6502 on the C64 followed by 68000 on the Amiga and Atari ST. Cracking games and the demo scene. First high level language was Pascal followed by C and Modula 2. Later C on Macintosh (MPW) & c++ on NeXTStep along with Objective-C. Now I'm doing C++ on Linux.

  49. Bottom Up thats the way by ZenMasterPool · · Score: 1

    My 1st language was assembler in the 80's Sinclair ZX line (mainly ZX Spectrum 48k). Back on the time, i used count t-states (cpu cycles) and manual optimize assembler code. Good times prior internet and even modems where we exchanged assembler routines via normal post mail letters.. like heavy letters every 4 weeks or so, side by side with "almost girl friend" flirt letter.. oh good times when coming home after school wondering for new mail responses :D Anyway, back to topic i was lucky to start down bottom with assembler and then kept going up in abstraction.. i would risk suggesting its a good best practice no matter how fast is hardware or how much elasticity exists in parallel processing of data like with hadoop... in the end deep bottom everything still relies in pretty simple and basic constructs. Good Day everyone.

  50. Dartmouth Basic first. by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    Basic. Dartmouth Basic. (At school on an interactive terminal to a Prime 300 IIRC)
    Fortran (At school. On punch cards fed to some IBM mainframe in the basement.)
    Intel 8080 assembler (At school, IMSAI 8080 running MP/M)
    Fortran (At work, PDP-11 running RSX-11M)
    Macro-11 (At work, PDP-11
    Pascal (At Work, in service class)

    At some point I heard about C and got "The C programming Language" and started to learn that. I've used that for more projects in the ensuing 30+ years than anything else. Along the way I also learned/used Java, C++, and I'm now learning Go. I've scripted with sh/bash, Rexx, Perl, Python. I've dabbled with a few others like Rust, TCP, PHP and probably others I've forgotten.

  51. 360 machine/assembly, FORTRAN, and PL/1 by bfwebster · · Score: 1

    Changed my major to CS in 1974; my first CS class (BYU), we started with a IBM 360 pseudo-machine code (on punched cards) and then moved on to actual 360 assembly (also on punched cards). Later in the semester, we had to buy a FORTRAN text (which I still have), teach ourselves FORTRAN, and pass a proficiency test. (My professor for that class was Dr Alan Ashton, who would end up being on of the co-authors of Word Perfect. Great teacher.)

    At the same time, I started working part time for a computer-assisted translation research project on campus that was using PL/1; my first task was doing data entry of Spanish vocabulary, but I bought a text on PL/1 and started teaching myself.

    I'd actually had some brief exposure to BASIC a few years earlier, but not enough to claim it was my first language.

    --
    Bruce F. Webster (brucefwebster.com)
  52. Dartmouth Basic by tbuskey · · Score: 1

    Growing up near the college, they had free accounts. My High School had a teletype & modem.
    Later, my school got Commodore CBM/PET systems.

    We also had a SuperPet. It had APL, Interpreted Pascal which I tried. It had Fortran, Cobol and 6809 Basic which I didn't try.
    I had an Apple ][+ and did lots of Basic, some assembly and Apple Pascal with the built in Bugger. Simply recompiling would sometimes clear up errors.

    In college, I learned Fortran (MS and Vax) and dabbled with Turbo Pascal. After college, C, shell scripting, perl, Lex, DOS Batch.

    Most recently, Python. As a sysadmin/devops, it's all shell and python nowadays.

  53. HyperTalk by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

    For a few years HyperTalk (the programming language of HyperCard) and a single reference book was my only contact with programming.

  54. FORGO by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...an interpreted version of Fortran for the IBM 1620. The machine had 10K BCD digits plus the deluxe 10K add-on; the interpreter took up 15K of that, so you had 5K for your program. I/O was on cards or a console typewriter.

    We also had a compiler for Fortran IV.

  55. Like Most... by craigminah · · Score: 1

    I started with BASIC on a Commodore Vic-20 and P.E.T. then moved on to assembly on a Commodore C-64 (thank you Jim Butterworth for your two books). After that, I programmed in Pascal, C and Visual Basic dependent on what I needed to get done and how much time I needed to dedicate to it.

  56. BASIC and Z80 by ruir · · Score: 1

    I started learning BASIC in the summer time with a Timex 2048, in the autumn a TRS-80 at school, by november BASIC in XTs, and December went full head down on Z80 assembly.

  57. What ? No APL ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I must be REALLY old then. APL was the first language I learned, the most powerfull mathematical computer language in the 60's. It was decades ahead of its time. I remember, when I started getting familiar with other langauges like FORTRAN or BASIC, thinking how primitive those were compared to APL. Landed my first IT job in the 80's because of my APL skills which were very rare and in demand in the research job I was applying for.

    1. Re: What ? No APL ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup. APL\360 in high school in 1972. I never looked back (or forward). Everything else seemed stupid. Still programming in APL descendants.

  58. Re:Old people will probably say BASIC by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Yeah, had a Sinclair Spectrum. BASIC comes up as the shell.

    Also used BASIC on a RM-380 something at school.

    Dabbled with assembler on both, didn't really get very far.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  59. IBM's PL/I by TEDonaldsn · · Score: 1

    PL/I as part of CS 1 & CS 2 as an undergrad in the late 1970's on Amdahl System 360 clone. Punched cards, green & white striped 132 column printouts. One-day turnaround to submit, compile, run, get output. Then on to PDP-11 Macro-11, MOS Technology 6502 assembler, COBOL, Pascal, Xerox Interlisp-D, C, C++, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, Objective-C, Swift, etc.

    --
    Retired software developer developing neural-net related software in Swift just for the hell of it.
  60. Algol 60 by DoctorBonzo · · Score: 1

    yeah, I'm that old

  61. I'm old by macbass · · Score: 1

    Apple Basic.

  62. APL by zeke7237 · · Score: 2

    Even though I didn't actually take the course, my HS (in 1970-73) had a course called "Computer Math". The language was APL, we had a selectric typewriter and a 300 baud acoustic-coupled modem, and it connected to a System 360 at a university in the next town. I was obsessed with it .. along with a friend (who actually took the course and had credentials I could borrow) we used to sneak into the university computer lab so we could use the VDT instead .. Weirdly enough, I currently program in a language derived from APL (k3 from kx systems)

  63. Another Fortran by michael_cain · · Score: 1

    1970, my high school had a Teletype model 33 connected to the timeshare mainframe at the local university. I was on my own with absolutely minimal documentation. Learned bad habits that took years to break.

  64. FORTRAN by foistboinder · · Score: 1

    FORTRAN, followed by Algol.

  65. Re:BASIC on a PDP-11 by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    We only had FOCAL, on a PDP-8.

    The binary sequence to boot the thing up was actually an octal sequence on the console switches, to get the high speed optical paper tape reader to start loading the FOCAL interpreter.

  66. TUTOR by GrokvL · · Score: 1

    As 7th grader found Florida State University's PLATO system and learned TUTOR. First program was a frog icon (bitmap) that jumped to the location where you touched on the touch screen. Spent the next 6 years running to the university after school and staying until midnight when they shut it down.

  67. In Order by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Basic...in high school, circa 1973, on teletypes, with acoustic modems and paper tape.
    FORTRAN... the first language I was taught in CS when I decided it was time to get out of working on hardware...around '84
    Pascal... intermediate CS
    C...one of my last CS classes
    C++...at work in the late 90s
    PHB...when I was pushed into management

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  68. 1401 SPS by sbinning · · Score: 1

    In 1966 my high school offered a computer programming class. Although we had a FORTRAN, compiler the class they offered was IBM 1401SPS. The instructor was one chapter ahead, at best, and his knowledge was so little he could not explain that when the Move data instruction was used the data was still in its original place also. The computer we used was an IBM 1620. Punch cards of course.

    The class was enough to whet my appetite and I made my career working with computers. I first worked in H/W maintenance, then as a programmer (assembly and FORTRAN). My introduction to UNIX was in 1983. Then I spent 8 years in mini-computer sales as a pre-sales engineer and finally as a UNIX sysadmin. My first internet experience was in 1988. There certainly have been a lot of changes in the last 40+ years.

  69. BASIC by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    BASIC, then Pascal.

  70. BASIC and more by Balthisar · · Score: 1

    BASIC on a TRS-80 MC10. When teaching myself how to program using the "BASIC Games for All Computers" type of books, Radio Shack actually had knowledgable employees who taught me what a function is, and how to translate DEF FN to something useful in its version of BASIC. As an elementary school kid, I had no idea that functions were a "math thing" until probably high school.

    Later, BASIC on my C=128, some 8502 assembly just to speed things up, then Turbo Pascal once I got into the PC world. Later, C/C++/Objective-C, dabble in Ruby when necessary, dabble in Javascript when forced to, and was never interested in Java. Oh, and AppleScript. God, I hate you AppleScript, but sometimes you're a necessary evil. Played with PHP for a while.

    --
    --Jim (me)
  71. Wang 360 programmable calculator by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1

    My high school got a Wang 360 programmable calculator. Programs were punched into IBM Port-a-punch (hanging chad fame) cards. My project was Barrowman's equations to compute the center of pressure of a model rocket. My first conventional language was FORTRAN on an IBM 1620, then machine language for that machine. 4900796 Then 1401 Autocoder, playtoy Lisp, 360 assembler, Pl

    1. Re: Wang 360 programmable calculator by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1

      Stupid tablet ... PL/I, various minicomputer machine languages, microcodes, and tons of 8080 assembler. Since 1982, nearly all C.

  72. 6510 Assembly by andrewa · · Score: 1

    Though I did dabble with a bit of BASIC to get the hang of things before that, but ditched it pretty quickly. I suppose my first real "language" was Turbo Pascal quite a bit later.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  73. GWBasic by Eruffaldi · · Score: 1

    Then assembler and C

  74. BASIC by cnaumann · · Score: 1

    BASIC, the some machine-level cose. First programming class was FORTRAN. Still program in C.

  75. Showing my age by timholman · · Score: 1

    Earliest language (high school): BASIC, operating on a time-shared (Honeywell?) minicomputer using punch-tape program storage and a teletype for input / output.

    Earliest college language: FORTRAN on a time-shared CDC Cyber. Initially wrote software using a teletype on IBM punchcards, then stood in line to pick up my output from a high-speed line printer. It was quite the thrill the first time I was able to sit down at a VDT and type / run / save my software using a video interface.

    Earliest application programming as an engineer: REXX and APL. Three guesses who I was working for. I still look back fondly at APL; it put you in a very different mindset while programming, as opposed to standard structured languages.

  76. BASIC FTW! by orcundead · · Score: 1

    It was BASIC, then Pascal, then C. Perl when I was older, nowadays it's Node.

  77. Fortran and Algol by kschendel · · Score: 1

    Specifically, WATFIV and ALGOLW at CMU. I was exposed to Basic early on but never had any opportunity to write anything in it. A couple semesters before I got there, they were starting students out on PLAGO (a reduced PL/I for student use that attempted to do fancy error detection and correction), but they left PL/I behind for Fortran. Very shortly afterwards, I got into PDP-8 assembly.

  78. Applesoft Basic by Tronster · · Score: 2

    I first learned to program on an Apple ][e at school; was ecstatic when we got one at home. Technically this was after being taught Apple Logo, but I don't consider that my first language.

    In Middle school I still remember learning IF PEEK(-16384)>127 THEN a key was pressed; the most important statement in moving from prompt based games to action based games. (Another good one POKE(49200) for a "click" through the speaker).

    In High school I learned about Beagle Bros. and their BASIC compiler; running some of my games 10 times after... really allowing me to make something fun.
    http://beagle.applearchives.co...

    Eventually that gave way to Turbo Pascal, which gave way to C++.

  79. 7 spaces by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    The fortran 77 compiler failed to compile your card deck for two reasons:
    1) the instructions were not 7 spaces from the right margin
    2) it's written in basic and this is a fortran compiler.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:7 spaces by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      core dump

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:7 spaces by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      From right margin? You surely meant left margin.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    3. Re:7 spaces by FormatReinstall · · Score: 1

      Intense FORTRAN sessions sometimes caused cross-eyed stupors that made the left margin look like the right margin.

  80. Basic by Revek · · Score: 1

    Texas Instruments basic to be exact. First taught language was pascal.

  81. Re:Old people will probably say BASIC by kschendel · · Score: 1

    Pffft. *Young* people will say BASIC. Back in the day, if the computer booted while I was around, it was going to be a bad day for everyone since it was THE computer and it only rebooted when it was broken. (I exaggerate slightly, there was a Univac 1108 as well but you had to have real funny-money to get at it.)

    Old people will say 7090 machine language or something like that. I'm not that old.

  82. Nobody else???? by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

    I self-taught myself Basic, followed by RBase / DBase, if those can be considered proper languages. My first college level language course was COBOL, of which I remember the formatting, but no syntax. C is still my favorite, mainly because it's so simple and powerful, but sadly it's rarely practical anymore. Golang is my second favorite.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  83. EDSAC Autocode by ancient_nerd · · Score: 1
    You really want to know? My first programming language was EDSAC Autocode for EDSAC 2, the (only) Cambridge University (UK) computer.

    EDSAC 2 had vacuum tubes for logic and mercury delay lines for memory. The programming course was taught by Maurice Wilkes in an auditorium to several hundred undergraduates, using a very bad PA system. I persuaded my Physics practical supervisor to let me use EDSAC to perform simple calculations on my experiment results and I wrote my first program in 1963 or 1964. [I was studying Maths and Physics because there were no Computer Science degrees back then.]

    After that, during my PhD, I learned machine code for the Digital PDP-8, a lovely little machine, and used it to drive my experiment hardware and collect results. I also learned PDP-8 Fortran, which was so stripped down it did not even have subroutines, and Algol 60 to use the Maths department's IBM 1620.

    Over my career I have had to be promiscuous about programming languages: POP-2, LISP, PROLOG , POP-11, Pascal, Java, C, C++, Basic(!), Javascript...

  84. binary load lifters by cnaumann · · Score: 1

    Very similar to Vaporators, in most respects.

  85. assembler by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

    When I arrived at Stanford in 1963, three computer languages were being taught: IBM 7090 assembly language, FORTRAN for the IBM 7090, and Algol 60, as implemented on the Burroughs B-5000. I learned all three, and taught myself DEC PDP-1 assembly language.

  86. Re:Fortran66 by redelm · · Score: 1

    FORTRAN as well, '66 for an IBM1401 (only arithmetic IF) at HighSchool. Later WATFIV (uWaterloo Fortran IV) on a '370.

    I still miss the IMPLIED DOLOOPS for READ/WRITE() -- load or dump pages of an array with one statement&fmt. And FORTRAN is said to have poor I/O :)

  87. Assembly Language by fgb · · Score: 1

    I can still remember spending many days reading and re-reading parts of "The Scelbi/Byte Primer", trying to understand the source listings. When I finally understood how a processor actually works, everything suddenly snapped into focus.

  88. Bit levers set on the Babbage Difference Engine by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    No, actually it was IBM 1410 Fortran I.

  89. Commodore Basic V2 by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Like everybody else my age.

  90. Old fart, reporting in by daveoj · · Score: 1

    BASIC on a Sinclair ZX81, followed by Z80, 6502 on a Commodore 16 (they were cheap), then 68000 on an Amiga. From there it was C/C++, Perl, Java, Javascript, Python, C#, bunch-of-other-stuff. Best days? 68000 assembly on the Amiga - translating C into assembler as the C compiler was too darn expensive.

  91. There's only one answer by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    **** COMMODORE 64 BASIC V2 ****

  92. Basic, on the Atari 800 by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    My first programming language was Atari BASIC. It was okay.

    I then fiddles with Visual Basic on an XT. After that it was perl for a couple of years, and then PHP. For all its warts and shortcomings, PHP has made me a mountain of cash over the years. Sneer all you want, but PHP has made my house payment for 15+ years as well as paying for cars and food and toys and vacations abroad.

    Please feel free to tell me how terrible PHP is, as I get a warm, satisfying feeling inside whenever I hear people bitterly criticizing PHP. It's like hearing people complain that the really cute girl I'm banging is wearing shoes they don't like. Guess what? I'm not dating her for the shoes, lol. :)

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Basic, on the Atari 800 by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Like I'm one to talk. I make my living writing C++.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Basic, on the Atari 800 by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Like I'm one to talk. I make my living writing C++.

      Ahh, C++...I have heard of it. A powerful yet little-known language with a couple of tricky bits, right?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  93. Focal by hey! · · Score: 1

    Which was a JOSS-like interpreter for the PDP-8. The first thing I ever did non-trivial work in was probably Scheme. The first professional programming I did was in Ratfor -- a C-like language which transcompiled to Fortran IV.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:FOCAL by mcguirez · · Score: 1

      Same here - I was surprised to see this listed here - fewer and fewer remember DEC let alone PDP-8 or FOCAL.

      Can't claim to remember much else about it other than it was similar to BASIC but my experience in the early 70's predated Gate's version. So I wouldn't have know that at the time.

      --
      When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras
    2. Re:FOCAL by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

      I learned Fortran first but we used PDP-8s in the University Computer Lab. I think you toggled in RIM and then used that to load the next level boot loader, BIM and then you could do "stuff". I played with FOCAL but IIRC, it was more of an interpreter than a compiler. Fortran was theoretically possible but it was hard to run on the 8 with no disks and just paper tape. I seem to remember that you had to cut the tape from the compile phase and feed the last part with the symbol table in first to the relocating assembler.

  94. FORTRAN 66 by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    I learned FORTRAN 66 (or FORTRAN 4 - can't quite remember) in 1975 when I was 36 years old. The class was offered by the School of Business and run on a CDC 6500 60 bit computer. Input was punch cards ander the cycle was: punch the cards for code being really careful to keep them in order; sandwich the cards between the CDC control language cards, wrap with rubber bands and drop in an input window; after 45 minutes to a couple of hours time later start checking for output consisting of the printer output wrapped around the cards; correct errors; and repeat the cycle.

    I learned quite quickly that the lab was almost empty at 10 PM so I got in the habit of doing my homework at night. I made friends with the operator and learned how to operate the machine which had 5 MB disk drives that were larger than my washing machine. IIRC it had 64 MB of memory and that 32 MB were available to the user. The printers were really, really fast and someone had wired a speaker to some part of the CPU so one could differentiate sounds and sometimes discern what tasks it was doing.

    Later that semester a time sharing system was set up and I switched to using a teletype for input and then used it for class but the FORTRAN was a little different, I taught myself BASIC at that time as well.

    One other thing I remembered was that most of the students, I think they were actually in the School of Business, had a really hard time 'getting it'. I used to compose my homework while the instructor was answering their questions.

    It was 'spaghetti' programming at its worst.

    --
    Nate
  95. BASIC by dwater · · Score: 1

    On the Commodore PET. On the BBC Micro not long after.

    --
    Max.
  96. Basics by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Atari BASIC, then QBasic, then Visual Basic. Then in college C++. Post-college, PHP and Javascript.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  97. C=64 by tonique · · Score: 1

    It was in 1984 using Commodore 64's fabulous BASIC. Then I got my hands on Simons' BASIC. The highlights of those days were:

    1) I did a quiz program that drew a flag and asked what country it belonged to. I measured the dimensions of the flags from a 18-part encyclopedia with a ruler. I also created, with trial and error, subroutines to draw stars (eg. pentagon, 15-gon). The colours were approximations, of course.

    2) I figured out how to create an equal temperament tuning, and created arrays of the relevant C=64 POKE addresses so I could enter notes like index,duration,index,duration in DATA and READ it in and so make three-voice tunes.

    Afterwards I got acquainted with Amiga BASIC, AMOS, Pascal (only very little), Perl and Bash, and then VBA...

    I'm not a professional programmer.

  98. Solder by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

    I am an engineer and used discrete components and latter RTL, TTL, and CMOS chips long before the 4004 was even thought of. Although these "computers" ran only one "program" which was hard wired into them they used the same laws of logic and Boolean algebra that latter software programmable computers used, I have always thought of solder as my first programming language.

    However, I have also written code in the following languages in roughly chronological order. Algol 60, PDP 8 assembler, Fortran, CDP-1802 op codes (hand assembled to Hex), C, Perl and probably a few more I can't remember. I also had to become at least fairly competent in using IBM JCL in order to run some packages of various kinds on big iron back in the day. Having just passed 70 years on this planet my current favorite toys are Arduino's and Raspberry Pi's. either of which are orders of magnitude past that PDP 8 I worked with decades ago. However, they still work the same way and everything I learned has built on everything I had learned before.

  99. Geezer Geek by cooper6 · · Score: 1

    System/360 Assembler back in 1969

  100. 8008 assembly by ipb · · Score: 1

    No compiler, no editor, no tools.
    Just hand written on paper and toggled in.

    Happy not to be doing it now, glad I had the experience.

  101. Re:Old people will probably say BASIC by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    I was already well into my thirties when I first encountered Basic. What was amazing about it to me was it being the first language I could own for myself.

  102. Machine language. by cohomology · · Score: 1

    In 1972, I wrote a tiny program in machine language for an IBM 1620. It was a decimal machine (sort of: see below) with 12 digit instructions and 40000 digits of memory. I punched the program onto cards. The program read a punched card, added two numbers on the card, and punched a card with the result.

    The machine had a disk operating system, a macro assembler, a Fortran II compiler, and a useful set of file manipulation programs. You could enter commands from a teletype machine. We had a washing machine sized disk drive and a line printer.

    We were required to start at the bottom with machine language so we knew what was really happening. The instructor introduced addressing, conditional branches, loops, subroutines, etc before we were allowed to use Fortran. He then convinced us, not rigorously, that it was at least possible for a computer to parse, translate, and compile. Only then were we allowed to use Fortran.

    I left home at 6AM to ride the New York City subways to school, arriving one hour before first class so I could learn assembly language from a manual I found in the closet. I struggled to write programs that were too advanced for me. When I eventually learned a technique, I had been primed with a problem that required it.

    For every type of computer I have ever programmed, I programmed it first in assembly language. I retired when this stopped being practical,

    http://tincansandstring.net/co...

    (Footnote) The hardware actually used 8 bit bytes. Six bits represented the usual characters, and the remaining 2 bits per byte where used for special purposes.

    --
    Hi to all my friends at NSA.

    --
    Don't mess with The Phone Company. Piss them off and you'll be using two tin cans and a piece of string.
  103. Spectra 70 Assembler. by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1

    It ran on an RCA 301 computer.

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  104. First languages... by Robear · · Score: 1

    Short course on APL with Hap Peele, then formal logic and computational lingistics, LISP, C, and Fortran. I think there's an advantage to programmers learning logic and functional algorithms before diving into specific languages. It gives the student conceptual models, ways to think about parts of languages, that work in multiple languages and make learning much easier (and solving problems faster and more efficiently comes along for the ride).

    Unfortunately, we don't seem to value logic much these days, as a preparation for programming or for real life.

    --
    French - The lingua franca of Europe!
  105. FORTRAN by davebarnes · · Score: 1

    FORTRAN in high school.
    Followed by multiple assembly languages during college summer jobs.
    Then COBOL.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
  106. What *should* be your first programming language? by Misagon · · Score: 1

    The underlying question behind the question is really about what CS students should be exposed to...
    When I was a beginning CS student I was exposed to a number of different languages, each being an example of a different mindset: machine language, object-oriented, functional, logical.
    I think that's important to learn not just about a programming language but about concepts. Especially in object-oriented programming there are quite a few concepts that you should have a grasp of to be a good programmer in any object-oriented language. And there are times that you could use lessons learned from functional or logical programming that you could apply also in OO programming.

    Once you are proficient enough in one language, and having seen a few different languages, picking up another language is easy enough. (the exception being C++) Then the challenge becomes getting acquainted with the standard library.

    Myself, I was somewhat self-taught before college. Started with Basic on the Commodore 64 and then 6510 assembly. Some basic on the Atari ST. 68000 assembly on the Amiga. Then C and C++ on PCs.
    I would otherwise recommend learning Ruby or Python. Ruby is underappreciated.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  107. Atari BASIC by cyba · · Score: 1

    It was really nice to have a programming language in ROM on 8-bit machines.
    Then Atari BASIC XL, Action!, 6502 assembler, etc.

  108. My first time by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    VBScript. Yeah, I know. Not the prettiest of languages, but you know, she was there and ready and willing. I really didn't know what I was doing, and I'm sure did quite a bit wrong, but I generally knew what to put where to get the job done.

  109. Java by AdamStarks · · Score: 1

    My high school offered a fairly comprehensive Computer Science program with a focus on Java, with the 2nd year giving AP credit.

    My college's first CSE course was focused on Python, which was many/most of my peers' first exposure to programming, but the breadth and depth of the material (excluding the language-specific stuff) was more or less equivalent to the HS material, so I breezed through it.

  110. Betty Crocker cookbook by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    The red and white checkered one from 1962

  111. Pascal not "clean"? by lsllll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WTF? Pascal is not clean? Pascal was DESIGNED to be clean. It is very clean. It has strict type checking and is extremely sensitive to syntax. It doesn't allow any hanky panky to take place with any of its variables. You can't modify any variable without its assignment operator. Variables have to be declared, or else you get a runtime error. How is that not clean? Tell me one thing Pascal (Not Turbo Pascal and other flavors, but the language as it was created) does that is not clean?

    Now, don't get me wrong. Pascal was a great language to learn straight programming, but was very limiting for every-day programming. Come Turbo Pascal. I must have written dozens, if not hundreds, of TSR programs that created ISRs, from sitting in the background and capturing keyboard input to recognizing that you changed your password on a NetWare server and sync it up to other servers. I even wrote a visual Connect 4 game that you could play over the network with your buddies, when the only LAN game I was aware of was "ncsnipes". Now those are things Pascal wasn't meant for, but Turbo Pascal extended the language very successfully and created a world where there was no end to what you could develop.

    --
    Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
    1. Re:Pascal not "clean"? by ventsyv · · Score: 1

      Yeah my sentiment exactly. My first language was TP and I can't think of cleaner, more consistent language.

    2. Re:Pascal not "clean"? by lsllll · · Score: 1

      While I did write keyloggers, this wasn't done via keyboard capture. It intercepted the call to NetWare's interrupt for changing password and made the same call to all the other servers we needed to sync the password on. True that the program was in possession of a plain-text password, but it technically wasn't a keylogger.

      --
      Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
  112. Bytecode on Videoton 1010B by kaur · · Score: 1

    Our school got an of Videoton 1010B, a Hungarian copy of a French minicomputer.
    The mini itself was made in 1973-1974.
    We got it in 1985.
    http://www.mmkm.hu/index.php/c...

    It had a classroom of 16x40 teletype displays, 64 kB hard drives the size of a big fridge, etc.

    I have the printouts of the programs.
    It was pure hex, not even assembler or anything mnemonic.

  113. Applesoft BASIC by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    On my dad's Apple ][+ clone (upgraded to a ][e for LOGO and PASCAL). Then MS BASIC v2.0 on my very first own computer, a breadbox C64. Afterwards, 6809 assembler in CEGEP, some PERL couple years ago, I don't really code anymore, but I'd like as hell to be able to read those old 5.25 floppies. That I can do for the C64 (still have one, and x1541 can transfer to PC, but Without buying extra hardware I'm kinda fscked for Apple disks.)

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  114. Algol 60 by brec · · Score: 1

    Also an introductory programming course at Stanford; the course title was, "Introduction to Algorithmic Processes." Instructor: Niklaus Wirth, who later created Pascal, Modula, Euler, Oberon, etc.

  115. Logo... in various forms... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Logo was my first programming language. Indirectly through the Big Trak toy (the 1970's version, not the iPhone version). Directly on the Apple ][ in the seventh grade (1983).

  116. ZZT-OOP by Nermal · · Score: 1

    Anyone else? ...anyone?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZZT-oop

  117. Pascal, “not clean”??? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    And not as clean as C? They’re smoking crack or what? Pascal is so clean you can’t shoot yourself in the foot like you can with C! Ever wondered why there were no exploits in MacOS like there are in Windows? Because MacOS is written in Pascal! Good luck doing a string buffer overrun in Pascal! Here is on what I wrote my first program ever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:Pascal, “not clean”??? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about the cleanliness of Pascal. But just FYI the current MacOS (OSX) is mostly written in C, assembly, and Objective-C, since its based off BSD. You're probably thinking of the original Mac OS, but from what I understand, it's not *quite* correct that it was Pascal either. Instead, they hand-translated some existing Pascal routines from the Apple Lisa into assembly to save on memory. So, it sounds like it was the Apple Lisa that largely used Pascal.

      Also, it's wildly incorrect to say there were "no exploits". All modern operating systems have had LOTS of exploits over the years, because very early on, security wasn't even considered. Probably not quite as many as Windows, but certainly not zero.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  118. First programming languages by woboyle · · Score: 1

    Fortran, then BASIC, then 8008 assembler, then C, COBOL, x86 assembler, SQL, Dibol, Snobol, Smalltalk, C++, ... Latest serious language is PHP.

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  119. BASIC by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

    Just like others who started up in the 80s, my first language was BASIC. Specifically, AtariBasic. Later, when I had gotten a C128, it switched to Commodore BASIC 7.0

    In both cases, I remember the hours I would spend typing in programs from magazines. Some of the games were fun. Unfortunately, I didn't have a disk (or tape) drive at the time, so after getting a program to work, the computer was kept on for days at a time until I tired of whatever I was playing with and moved on.

  120. BASIC by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

    BASIC programs were published in magazines and I taught myself from their example as a child. My first Computer Science class years later in High School was TurboPascal.

  121. Applesoft Basic, by CaroKann · · Score: 1

    Applesoft Basic on the Apple IIe was my first, along with some of the older Integer Basic, which seemed to run faster. Back then, programming for me consisted of typing in programs from magazines and books. I even typed in Apple hexadecimal machine code from magazines.

    Next was Basic programming on an IBM PCjr in high school, which was my first exposure to real, proper programming. Look back now, my high school was very forward thinking, and I was lucky to have attended that school.

    Pascal was my favorite early language, starting with a Pascal compiler on the Z-80 Softcard, followed by a very good Pascal compiler that ran on the Macintosh. In the late 80's, colleges taught basic principles, such as data structures and algorithms, using Pascal.

  122. Fortran IV by Chiny · · Score: 1

    My student days were with Fortran IV and then when those new-fangled microprocessors were almost affordable, moved on to 8008 coding in hex. Ah, then the heady days of Z80 hex... Even when I ran BASIC, I spent more time hacking new commands into it (starting with EPSon and EPSoff) than BASICing. No IDEs then, sigh.

  123. Re:Damage from BASIC by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    I totally disagree.

    If you were any good and had a "serious" program to build, you would realize the lack of
    a) structured loops
    b) structured if then else
    c) conventional ways of passing arguments into subroutines

    in early basic and learn by experience how to invent all of those out of re-usable patterns of gotos and assignments.

    This was actually really good for you, kind of like Army bootcamp.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  124. zx80 BASIC by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Then quickly learnt z80 for that extra bit of speed.

    --
    Task Mangler
  125. BASIC by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    BASIC, back in the day. I started teaching myself at 13, on a TI 99/4A. The school I was attending at the time had barely heard about computers, much less come up with a way to try to teach someone that young about them. I was actually starting to dabble in assembly language on that machine, and managed to get a sprite to move in response to me moving a joystick around. The school may have been woefully uninformed, but the public library was a pretty good resource.

    A fortunate move to upstate New York put me on a track to pick up some classes on BASIC and Pascal at the high school and Watfiv and assembly language at a local university that had a high school summer program. My senior project in high school was a graphing program that generated several kinds of graphs using Apple Pascal and the turtle graphics package that came with it. The system could barely handle it, but it was pretty spiffy. I wrote my own keyboard input routines that would allow me to set up fields of a specific size that would only allow certain characters to be typed into them.

    College was more Basic, which I was entirely fucking sick of by then, and some scripting languages. I got my intro to REXX there, which was much nicer than Basic. I switched schools into a more CS-oriented program and picked up C, Ada and COBOL. By then I was starting to hear about this newfangled C++, which really sucked back in the early '90's, let me tell you. They didn't even have a STL yet. They started talking about adding templates to the language a few years later.

    By then I knew my way around C pretty well, but mostly had to work on the shitty proprietary languages of the 90's. I got into some work that involved actual C programming in the mid 90's, and had a pretty solid decade of C programming. Since 2005 it's been a pretty steady mix of Java and C++, along with a bit of maintenance on some really badly-designed projects in Perl, Ruby and TCL. I'm currently doing a mix of C++ for hardware-level access to some specialty hardware I'm working on, and Java to provide some web services associated with that hardware. I might get into some Javascript to put it all together, but I'm going to try to leave that to the guys who are more comfortable with Javascript than I am.

    I don't see much new coming along the road. .net, go and rust are all sufficiently close to Java or C++ that they really don't interest me. Maybe if someone offers some large briefcases full of cash to work with them. I'd be more interested in doing some hand-optimized assembly language and perhaps some GPU programming, but that would probably take another decade to get good at.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  126. Re:Old people will probably say BASIC by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Yeah, today if only reboots frequently because someone let Bill Gates run the first successful software and OS company, and we've been paying the price of sloppy design at the core ever since. For contrast, some of my linux servers have uptimes measured in multiple years. Possible if your security strategy is firewall the hell out of it and leave it un-upgraded for stability.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  127. ROAR by catalina · · Score: 1

    punched on paper tape, for a Royal Precision computer, in 1962.

  128. 8080 Assembler by chthon · · Score: 1

    In 1980, as there was only the course "Microprocessors" from A.J. Dirksen here available (Belgium/Holland). I was 14.

  129. Assembly, sort of by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I was given a Programma 101 with all docs, fortunately, that just needed some repairs. It used an assembly-like language, and i managed to write a checkbook balancing routine on it. Then i gave it away.

    I acquired an HP-41 soon after, that was much more fun. Balancing a checking account in RPN is simple.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  130. Signetics 2650 assembly by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Surely you want to hear my life story. What else on a drab Sunday like this. (The sun actually shines brightly.)

    I Built an Elektor TV Games Computer. Programmed 2650 assembly but I was too young and actually sucked at it.

    Then came Basic but I didn't see/have an actual purpose.

    My first job I got for knowing Prolog and Pascal.

    First significant projects were actually in C.

    Then Java. Huge amounts!

    C-like syntax rocks!

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  131. English by IHTFISP · · Score: 3, Interesting

    English.

    Then arithmetic. Then algebra. Then geometry. Then integral/differential calculus.
    Then TRS-80 Basic. Then 6502 assembly language. Then Forth.
    Then Scheme. Then dBase II. Then C on Unix w/ tcsh & bash. Then Java. Etc.

    Note that the question was “programming language”, not computer “programming language”.

    First order logic came into play fairly early on, too, but that's not a language per se so much as a technique/methodology.

    --
    Error: NSE - No Signature Error
    1. Re:English by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There have been a number of computer languages called english (with varying amounts of capitalization).

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  132. Commodore 64 BASIC by The+Raven · · Score: 1

    Not much beat having a REPL loop be the OS boot prompt. But BASIC is a crappy language to learn programming in. Similarly, fuck JavaScript. A language you teach with should not be full of surprises and exceptions. It should be consistent and simple. How about LUA?

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  133. Basic / Pascal by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    I guess my very first programming experience would be Logo sometime in elementary school, but about the same time I was learning GWBasic. My dad got me a book from the library that had programs you could type in and run. I've never forgotten typing in 500 lines (supposed to be some kind of space shooter) and then program didn't work. I never figured it out!

    Soon after I started using Qbasic (the version that could compile EXE files).

    My next programming language was Pascal through Delphi and then C++ through Borland's C++ Builder. I picked up a copy,of the K&R C book around the same time that today is very well worn!

    I was very interested in different languages around high school and so I picked up a smattering of Visual Basic, a senior high school independent study in Visual Studio C / windows API (why?!), x86 assembly, OS/2 REXX scripting, etc. I wrote an ecommerce site for a local business in 1999 using PHP and a perl cgi-bin cart system.

    Picked up Java in college, one course with Prolog, etc.

    Today I'm not a professional programmer, but I end up using PHP, Python and Perl for text processing, SQL, etc with some regularity.

  134. BASIC, from a paper book by rpresser · · Score: 1

    In 1977, at age ten, I started reading BASIC, from a paper book, before I ever saw a computer.

  135. CGAT by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    CGAT. Started at the age of -9 months.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  136. BASIC / Z80 Assembler / Pascal / C / x86 Assembler by andrei.gavrila · · Score: 1

    BASIC and Z80 Assembler on a Sinclair Spectrum clone, then Pascal with some x86 Assembler - routines to enable mouse pointer, get coordinates, init the video modes, fast memcopy for video buffering. C came a little bit later with C++ following closely :) Then a lot more x86 Assembler. Afterwards, all went bad - JavaScript, Java, C#, Objective C and many more :)

  137. Language Progression by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    I went from BASIC to Assembly to C to Java to C++, etc. I know there are at least half a dozen languages I used and forgot from disuse.

  138. Commodore Basic by hvidstue · · Score: 1

    .. followed by Turbo Pascal 7.0

  139. Fortran by LesserWeevil · · Score: 1

    Fortran, but I learned later you can write Fortran in any language.

  140. So, how old am I? by jasnw · · Score: 1

    Old. My first programming (1967) was done on a programmable Wang calculator on hand-punched cards, followed closely by learning Fortran II on CDC Big Iron. However, I really didn't start learning the skills of programming a computer until I took a class in CDC assmbly language (SCOPE) programming a couple of years later. That down-to-the-metal level of programming taught me what was going on in the machine that the Fortran compliler had been hiding from me. Made me a much better programmer than I would have been otherwise.

    1. Re:So, how old am I? by kschendel · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the CDC machines. I never actually programmed one but came close. A company I worked at was bought by an outfit with a bunch of CDC machines and we were going to port something, I forget what, to the CDC's using assembly. I read the manuals and decided that the best description of the architecture was a cluster of PDP-8's all talking to a very high speed, programmable floating point attachment. :-)

  141. Seems misguided by djbckr · · Score: 1

    The summary:

    When Roberts came to Stanford in 1990, CS106A was still taught in Pascal, a programming language he described as not "clean."

    Now he's thinking Javascript is a good first language to teach CS? Is he on meth?

    While Pascal had its foibles, I always considered it to be a good strong language - comparable to C in that what you programmed went to the machine pretty much the same way C does.

  142. FOCAL by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

    FORTRAN II was my second language; first was FOCAL on a PDP 8. The bootstrap had to be keyed in to read and load the paper tape.

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  143. OCaml by Milharis · · Score: 1

    I learned OCaml first in school, I do not use it anymore, but it's quite nice. It's a pretty good way to start learning programming if you have a maths background too.
    Then C, and that's when you really start missing some nice functional things like pattern matching, first class functions or type inference.

  144. Ah, nostalgia... by alexo · · Score: 1

    When I was in grade school, my father used to work on a mainframe computer. I was curious and used to bug him with questions, and eventually he brought me a couple of manuals. My first computer program was written on an 80-column paper form and started with "IDENTIFICATION DIVISION."

    Shortly later, I joined a "computer club" and got to play around with an 8080 board with a hex keypad for input and a line of LEDs for output. That was my first exposure to assembly language and machine code.

    Later, in high-school (early '80s), I got exposed to personal computers and programmable calculators. So, roughly in chronological order: 8085, TI-59 (belonging to a fellow student), BASIC, 6502 (neighbour had a VIC-20), 6509 (got my first computer: a TRS-80 CoCo)

  145. BASIC - ... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Apple's BASIC. Does Apple's LOGO count too? I loved them. And then, college for Pascal, C++, C, ASM, HTML, ASP, etc. I hated them since I prefer breaking stuff.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  146. Perl by iwulinux · · Score: 1

    I suppose you could argue that it was BASIC on the C64, but I never really *learned* any of it, just typed in stuff. I made a half-ass effort with Perl. I got taught C++ at Illinois Wesleyan (last class to take C++; the next year, they switched to Java).

    --
    -- "Broadly speaking, the short words are the best, and the old words best of all."
  147. PL/C on mark-sense cards by dforsey · · Score: 1

    Jan, 1976 - UoGuelph

    PL/C using mark-sense cards, lying in an infirmary with a collapsed lung and nothing to read but textbooks.

    Read the whole PL/C textbook while waiting to heal - never had to go to class afterwards except for exams.

    Then a parade of languages: COBOL, APL, PDP assembler, VAX assembler, IBM 360 assembler, C, Snobol, Lisp, Pascal, Fortran and a bunch I've forgtotten - all while getting a Zoology degree.

    Ended up as a CS prof. That collapsed lung wasn't the catastrophe I thought it was at the time.

  148. COBOL by Kreigh · · Score: 1

    Good old mainframe COBOL. Followed by System 360 assembler. Some years later the PC was invented.

  149. TI-BASIC by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    It was TI-BASIC on the TI-83 Plus graphing calculator. Taught myself from the calculator's book sized manual, mostly during study hall period in high school. I would print out my more complex programs (I had a serial to 3.5mm audio data cable), so I could trace the logic of my GOTO statements. I knew exactly what the professor was talking about the first time I heard the term "spaghetti code." My second language was assembly on the calculator's Z80 CPU, also self taught. And my first language taught in college was C++.

  150. PL/1 by hedley · · Score: 1

    IBM 370 via punch cards. This was 1979. Luckily got a wilbur acct for the 370 assembly class or it too would have been punch cards. Imagine assembly on punch cards....

    Before that if it counts, Ti 58C calc.

    H.

  151. 8008 hand assembler by flightmaker · · Score: 1

    Using toggle switches to load the resulting machine code into the system RAM.
    I believe the university was teaching 4004 a couple of years before I started my course and they moved to 8080 the year after.

  152. APL - IBM 360 Tektronix and IBM Selectric terminal by peterofoz · · Score: 1

    First contact with programming languages was APL at Orange Coast College in 1972. Next was PDP-8 Basic and paper tape on teletypes.

  153. Comal by heson · · Score: 1

    Comal, for the COMPIS.

  154. Re:Fortran/Basic by klubar · · Score: 1

    Started with Fortran IV and migrated to APL. Then switched to Basic. Picked up PDP-8 Assembler along the way.

    Now you kids get off my lawn.

  155. ALGOL-W by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    I played with Basic in high school but did my first undergrad stuff in ALGOL-W. As an undergrad I messed with Pascal, Fortran and PL/I. One of my profs at the time was an author of the ALGOL 68 report, thought BCPL was cool and that C (a relatively new language at the time) was a mental disorder. He gave us an assignment in APL once. I guess I'm showing my age.

    Now I do 99% of my work in C. My boss and I agree to disagree on scripting languages. I like Python. He thinks Python is ridiculous and insists on Perl for production work.

    ...laura

  156. All the standards by gardner · · Score: 1

    Fortran/Watfor/Watfiv for doing actual math efficiently
    Then COBOL because business contracting
    Then PL/I because IBM wanted it to be (yet it never really was)
    Then IBM assembly language, so that knowing LM 14,12,12(13) ; BR 14 would remain in my brain as long as it sits inside my head

  157. languages by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Basic on the ZX Sinclair, Basic on apple II+ (I tried to learn 6502 assembler at the time but sadly it was over my head), Basic on C64. When I got an IBM-XT clone I decided that C was the way to go, but I also dabbled with pascal because Pyroto Mountain the online BBS game was in it. Later in my post-grade school they used Pascal for the early classes, and there was PL/I, APL, lisp, C. In the end I got a job as an assembler programmer (how ironic is that??) which I picked up easily by then, and then I learned bash/perl/python.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  158. Bourne shell by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

    I messed with logo first but Bourne shell is when I really got in to it. Suppose that makes me weird...

  159. 1977 BASIC on Teletype by Captain+Ramage · · Score: 1

    Learned BASIC on a high-school teletype connected to a nearby time share computer. Once we got enough proficiency we were allowed to move to the new TRS-80 Model I.

  160. ROM BASIC by rnws · · Score: 1

    BASIC on a VZ200 with a Z80 processor and (according to the ad), a "whopping" 8kb of RAM. Ah, peek, poke, gosub and goto, sigh...

  161. Basic and Pascal by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 1

    We did Basic in high school and then Pascal my first year of college. Then on to assembly (IBM 360 mainframe) and then C.

  162. Algol 60 by Tetch · · Score: 1

    ... while still at school (i.e. aged ~15). Algol 60 was clearly elegant and 'well-designed'. We learned it in an after-school club run my one of the maths teachers (thanks "Jake"). It was followed by Fortran IV for the comparison with a language that while very useful was about as horrible to use as a language could be. We wrote on coding sheets which the teacher posted to a nearby university, and we received the corresponding punched card deck and lineprinter output showing our syntax errors "in as little as a week".

    NB: I freely acknowledge that there are worse-looking languages than Fortran these days: Perl, APL, Mumps, IBM mainframe JCL for starters :)

    Our first teaching language at university was BASIC, which I'm not ashamed about .... soooo easy to write in (at terminals which were teletypes with scrolling paper and paper-tape readers) ... it's kind of limiting, but we had a lot of fun that first year. Then came the second year, in which we were introduced to The One True Language - Algol68. If it were still commonly used I'd look for jobs requiring it even now.

    To paraphrase a well-worn metaphor: C ... meh ... shoot yourself in the foot ......... C++ .. meh ... blow the whole of your damn leg off.

    FWIW: comparison of Algol68 with C++

    PS: non type-safe languages ..... what ????!??! (Javascript ... ugh, puke)
    Languages in which white-space is significant ..... what ?!???!!!!!? (I'm looking at *you*, Python)

    --
    If you don't pray in my school, I won't think in your church.
  163. C++ For Dummies by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

    My first programming language was unlike most posting here as either Fortran or Basic. I went straight to a box I found in my dads room, full of the Borland C++ compiler on about 30 floppy discs, and its technical manual explaining each function. I remember installing this on one of our 7 computers, a strange amount for a family to have back in 1998, and getting familiar with the Borland IDE.

    For Christmas that year my parents got me more programming books, and I continued my self study for the last two decades and have held various jobs programming in anything from PHP and Python, to C++ with Qt, or most recently, C#.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  164. FOCAL by RealGene · · Score: 1

    Specifically, FOCAL Amity 1969, on a DEC PDP-8/L with 4K core. Attached to an ASR33 with paper tape reader and punch. Good times.

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
  165. IBM 1130 assembler by ErnyCowan · · Score: 1

    In 1966 my first serious job was as a punch card operator at an insurance company that had an IBM 1401. There I learned to plug the control panels for the IBM 77 collator. I registered for a programming course at a community college where I learned to program in assembler on an IBM 1130. That was the best return on $20 that I ever had. That course led to a job programming business applications in assembler on an IBM 360/30. That led to programming CICS applications in the days when IBM licenced it free to any business that was interested and ultimately to systems programmer positions overseas. That initial $20 paid my mortgage, put my two sons through university, paid my way around the world twice.

  166. PAL3 Assembler by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    For a DEC PDP 8. Paper tape-based, two pass. Followed quickly by FOCAL and BASIC.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  167. Basic-Pascal-C-C++-Java- by ghoul · · Score: 2

    Started out with Basic in 5th Grade(1990). Put one floppy in to load dos. Put the other floppy in to load Basica or GW-Basic and you are off to the races. Hard Disks? What Hard Disks?
    Then Grade 7 we start with this cool new Language Pascal. Structs Cool!!
    Grade 9 We start C. Pointers. ugh!!!
    Grade 11-12 C++. Well we pretty much kept writing C code just used objects.
    Then this cool new hot Language comes around everyone is excited about Java!!
    Get to college- Computer Sci 101- Fortran. WTF? Well our professor is smart. He says we will use Java even though the course is called Intro to programming using Fortran. (The college was a state college and it used to take 5 years to change the official course).
    So we use Java and C++(MFC&ATL) in college.
    First job - Training on Cobol!!! WTF squared. Anyway lucky enough to get assigned a group using C++ and not to a group using Cobol , VB , .net or Java (Though had to take the training on all of them). Yes it was one product with each module in a different language . Go figure
    Then get on a project porting the old code base from C++/Tuxedo to Java/J2EE. Good times. Not much time to do laundry, sleep or take showers but good times.
    Leave to go do a Masters and the first course is AI . Learn Lisp. Then ML, of course Java and C are around as is C++ templates and one wierd Machine learning class that uses Algol.
    Leave college and go to a job. The company is doing Java, C++ and .net. Mess around with all of them. Get interested in Python as a scripting language. Then get interested in Android. New job. PM for a group doing mobile development. Learn ObjC so that the developers cant bullshit me.
    Now Java 8 and scala are bringing functional programming and closures . For someone who did Lisp and Objective C thats old news.

    What I am trying to say is the languages change and each one teaches you something. Each has its place. As long as you are willing to keep learning the particular language you are using today does not matter.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  168. Quit knocking BASIC, guys! by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    If you were willing to dig into the obscure commands, which I was, you'd have found it very powerful. When I say dig, I mean the specs of your hardware rig, too. My first was BASIC – 1st on an Apple IIe, and later on an IBM PCjr.

    Using just BASIC, I was able to write polyphonic music, cartoons, games, multiple-screen programs, and even a Photoshop-like drawing program (in 1987) that let you save and re-open files later for more editing. Last, I almost constructed a robotic CD-player, with playlists being columns checked or not, but then along came college.

    BASIC was powerful if you were willing to really dig deep into the manual. Of course, once things came to data structures, you were basically out-of-luck.

  169. My first programming language was... by NecroMancer · · Score: 1

    ZX Spectrum BASIC!

    Followed a few years later by Turbo Pascal and C.
    I also learned (at a more basic level), Java, Fortran 77.

    I self-taught myself BASH scripting, Perl, Python and PHP.

  170. Commodore BASIC by ARoamingGeek · · Score: 1

    I cut my programming teeth on a VIC-20 and BASIC. Peek and Poke, ftw!

  171. Does an HP-41 count ? by balbeir · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, Pascal, then Modula 2 in CS

  172. BASIC by Halster · · Score: 1

    Specifically, BBC Micro Basic.

    --

    "How much truth can advertising buy?" - iNsuRge - AK47
  173. This this thread has shown anything by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

    If this thread has shown anything, it has shown that the age of people on Slashdot is not below 35.

  174. First Programming Language by bkalal · · Score: 1

    My first was BASIC on a GE MARK IV time-share system developing engineering support, data circuit analysis, and interactive data circuit design programs for what was then the Ohio Bell Telephone Company. Later I got to convert all the programs to FORTRAN.

  175. Do I win with IBM 1620 machine language? by troll · · Score: 1

    Not assembler language -- machine language .
    Punched cards and numbers.
    There was a calculator before that, but I don't remember its name.

    --
    Official Pi Ambassador -- inquire for details!
  176. BASIC and Pascal by tim620 · · Score: 1

    My first language was BASIC, in various forms. My first computer was a Commodore VIC-20 and my school had Commodore 64's, so Commodore BASIC was my first language. My next computer was an Apple IIc, so then it was Applesoft BASIC. When I was a senior in High School, the Commodore 64's were replaced by IBM PS/2's, so I also learned some GW BASIC.

    The first language I learned in college was Pascal. Followed by COBOL, FORTRAN, C, C++ and Assembly. Java, html, perl, and python did not exist yet.

    As a UNIX/Linux administrator, I mostly "program" in bash/ksh shell script, with a little python sprinkled in. :-)

  177. Yup, FORTRAN 77! by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 1

    I think we used a Harris H/500 minicomputer and connected via VT100's wired through a Gandalf box into a baseband network. Actually I'm not sure they even taught anything else back then, except maybe COBOL if you were a business major, LOL. I guess there must have been some sort of Assembler courses perhaps? FORTRAN was pretty much the language of choice in those days, but within 5 years (this was 1981) C was dominant. I think I took a Pascal class in about '83.

    --
    "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
  178. Eliot 803 autocode by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Our school was given an old computer by a company upgrading to a Pdp8. We learned Eliot 803 autocode before many school kids saw a computer: http://www.sciencedirect.com/s...

  179. Fortran on an IBM 1130 32K Ram by carld · · Score: 1

    IIRC

  180. Basic by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Computer kid of the 80ies here. ZX81, ZX Spectrum, C64, Sharp PC 1402 ... all had Basic.
    Later I even did some QBasic on DOS. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  181. Apple II DOS 3.3 BASIC by tdelaney · · Score: 1

    Apple II DOS 3.3 BASIC. Taught myself initially from "The Beginner's Computer Handbook" (Tatchell, Bennett, Watts) - yes, I still have my very first programming book. At the back were short BASIC computer games - I took them and started modifying (in my school's computer lab - IIRC we had an Apple IIc, 2x IIe and I think there was an IBM clone of some type). I was 11 years old.

    Later my Dad got a Mac 512K (or was it a Plus?) and was trying to teach himself Pascal to teach a computing class at high school (he was a physics/chemistry teacher). One day I took his MacPascal book, combined it with a 68K programming and ROM reference that I'd bought and read through and wrote a quick MacPaint-style program over the weekend (fake menus, I didn't understand XOR, etc but it basically worked).

    I learned more in that weekend than Dad did in the whole time he was working on it - I recognise it now as my first larval stage experience. It was at that point that I started to realise what my career would be.

    Technically I guess Apple II Logo was my first language, but I don't consider what I did with it to be "programming". My Year 6 class (last year of Primary education) we had some access to an Apple II and Logo, but I didn't exactly find directing the turtle to be fascinating and barely touched it (nor did anyone else IIRC). I never did anything that required any significant thought with it.

  182. Re:Damage from BASIC by hawk · · Score: 1

    This.

    I used BASIC as it was what was available on the machine I was paid to write.

    My BASIC, though, looked more like good FORTRAN than most basic, with thought out calls, etc.

    If the language you need to use doesn't have the control structure you need, just write it.

    Although I don't miss worrying about what line number to put routines at for efficiency (MBASIC until 5 or so would search through memory on a GOTO or GOSUB, making low-numbered calls faster than high-numbered).

    And it's amazing that noone has pointed out the adage that a sufficiently skilled programmer can write bad FORTRAN in any language . . .

    hawk

  183. FORTRAN by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

    on punched cards, put through a reader and then waiting for the operator to tear off your dot-matrix printed output to find out why it failed to compile (again). Within the hour, if they weren't too busy.

    Later on a teletype connected via Gandalf modem to a Honeywell multics timesharing system.

    Still later on a monochrome green CRT -- the first CRTs I'd ever seen. And the computer would respond in real time!

    Finally from home on a Compaq luggable via 300 or 1200 baud modem over a telephone line. And then things really took off.

    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
  184. FORTRAN by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    which I did on punched cards submitted to my teacher for runs. Yes, I'm ancient. My foggy recollection is that I perpetrated some of the worst code ever seen for that class; real spaghetti code, because that's what we were taught. Structured code? What's that?

  185. TL;DR - Javascript by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

    Javascript for me, then on to PHP. Tried a bit of C, C++, & ASM, but never really dove into it enough to be productive. Learned a lot from them though. Eventually I settled into Python, 'cause PHP had certain deficiencies that made it far less useful than Python to me. Now I'm exclusively a Python & Django guy.

  186. Basic by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    Learned on an Apple] [ with their tutorial diskette. Some C64 basic. Moved on to QBasic then Visual Basic. Finally learned something else with x86 assembly then settled on C. Which I loosely group Javascript, Java, Php inio

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  187. C++ should be the introductory language by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    I did my own research on this, and went through the top 10 computer science universities and looked at what they taught in their introductory CS classes. Python and Java made up 100% of them, with only one (Stanford) having a C++ option.

    Personally, I think C++ should be the introductory language for computer science majors. (Non-CS majors? Sure, teach them Python or Javascript.) Why? Because CS majors all have to learn computer architecture and usually assembly programming is part of learning architecture. It's way, way easier for people to go from C++ to ASM than it is to go Python to ASM or Java to ASM. So a lot of assembly classes I've gone through have backed away from teaching ASM and instead teach C with a touch of ASM in it, which means that their education gets compromised by an attempt to make the introductory class easier.

    But research in computer science education shows that you can learn basic computer science principles pretty much equally well regardless of language taught, so we're sacrificing educational quality for no real benefit.

    I think most opposition to C++ came from people that learned it back in the day with square bracket arrays and char* strings, none of which really should be used any more now that we have vectors and strings. (And have had for a very long time, really.) Modern C++ is a very enjoyable language to code in.

  188. Basic by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    My first programming language was a form of Basic (I forget which one) on Apple IIe computers. During middle school, we were instructed to program a slot machine program. Essentially, the assignment was to pull three random array entries and display those. Easy, right? I coded mine, looked up, and everyone was still working. So I decided to add more features. I added in betting with the game repeating until you lost all your money or decided to walk away with your winnings. I looked up and people were still coding. So I added in a loan shark who would lend you money which you had to pay back (with interest) or he'd end your game for you. (I actually had it display that he "took an arm and a leg.") I looked up and FINALLY people were finishing their assignments.

    I blew the teacher and my classmates away with what I had made. That SHOULD have been my sign that I needed to go into programming, but it took me until college where I almost failed quantum mechanics as I aced my computer science classes to switch on that light bulb.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  189. BASIC of course by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    I learned BASIC on an Orange Toaster

    I wanted to play games so I had to type them in from Creative Computing magazine and various other magazines and books and of course they didn't always work because there were subtle differences in various versions of BASIC.

    I eventually got my hands on an Apple ][ Plus on which I expanded my knowledge of BASIC and learned 6502 assembly language. The first programming class I ever had was in Fortran.

    Like most of the good programming courses I've taken though it was not a class to teach a specific language, it was meant to be an introduction to programming and Fortran just happened to be the language we used. And that's the only time I've ever used Fortran.

  190. BASIC by WerewolfOfVulcan · · Score: 1

    BASIC on an HP-3000 mainframe in 1980. We had a DECWriter terminal (basically a dot-matrix printer with a keyboard attached) that connected from our junior high school to a local university's mainframe via modem. You took a regular phone, lifted the handset, dialed the number, the modem on the other end would pick up, and you'd put the handset into this cradle that was attached to the DECWriter. Then you'd get a login prompt. Awesome. }:-)

  191. BASIC by bearinboots · · Score: 1

    BASIC, quickly followed by FORTRAN, Cyber assembly, and Pascal. The latter I loathed.

  192. 6502 Assembly Language by CyclistOne · · Score: 1

    Using a SYM-1 single-board computer.

    It was fun, and I learned a tremendous amount about programmming close to the hardware.

  193. FORTRAN IV on a CDC 6600 by john.r.strohm · · Score: 1

    First language was FORTRAN IV on the CDC 6600 at UT Austin.

    I learned BASIC a couple of years later, then various assembly languages (specifically including 6600 CP COMPASS), then PASCAL on the 6600. LISP on 6600 a little, more assembly languages (PDP-11 and DEC-10 in particular, Intel 8080, Motorola 6800 and 6809, and I don't know what all else).

    Starting in about 1988, I was doing Ada and C. I started doing C++ while doing refresher work at UT Austin in 2003-2004, and still am.

  194. Extended Basic by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    On the TI-994A. Oh the fun.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  195. Forth here, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Forth, to victory! On a "smart terminal" that actually had a whole chip to do the "Backspace" function. I was 8 or 9 I think.

  196. My first? by sconeu · · Score: 1

    North American Recomp III *MACHINE* language. Hand coded in octal.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  197. Assembler, Basic, FORTRAN by john.sheley · · Score: 1

    Taught myself various flavors of assembly in high school (8080, 6502, 6809) as well as Apple integer basic. In college (1979) CS100 was FORTRAN taught by a "visionary" that was convinced that learning how to punch cards was a useful job skill. Best language learned that year was Pascal in an elective class. No matter what the first language is, the second one should be assembler. Modern languages are great, but a lot of people have lost touch with how their fancy functional language actually executes on the hardware and what the memory consequences are of their code.

  198. Basic on ZX Spectrum by Flu · · Score: 1

    Later on, I tought myself assembler on the same computer. Then I learnt assembler on the Commodore 64, followed by Pascal, Modula-2 and finally C on the Amiga. As life got on, I learned C++ and Java, and recently I've learnt Python. But I still use C and assembler in my daily work as embedded software designer on ARM Cortex-M and smaller MCU's.

  199. 1976 ... by GoblinKing · · Score: 1

    COBOL followed a couple of years later by BASIC and 6502 assembler (Apple ][)

  200. zx80 Basic, 384 bytes of programming space by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    Yup 512 bytes were used for screen memory, 128 for system memory and 384 for basic. I quickly learned to program in assembly, because you could actually do things in assembly, whereas the basic was filled up very quickly.

    Optimization was all about code size.

  201. mIRC by Tukz · · Score: 1

    It may seem like a joke, but I actually learned the basic logic from scripting in mIRC IRC client. I think it's python or TCL based scripting language.
    I moved to C afterwards, then C++ and so on, staying in C syntax languages.

    I use it as an example when people ask me how I learned to code. My answer is always to "find something you use a lot and learn to modify it or figure out an small application you could use and learn to make it"

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  202. Fortran - on punched cards by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

    And get off my lawn!

    And yes, I still cut code ... though not, I admit , in Fortran. Thankfully. (Tried C, Basic, Pascal, Java, C#, COBOL, RPG, BCPL, Algol, Simula, PHP, Forth, assemblers, Javascript, and many, many others. They all look the same after a while - oh boy, the number of times I've used a + in PHP where it needs to be a dot).

    Yup, Fortran on an IBM 11/30 - 1970 (think bell bottom jeans and possibly The Beatles). It had a multi pass compiler (said to be 14, but maybe someone was exaggerating) and 4096 words (not bytes) of memory - core memory. Actual core, with little rings and everything. And an IBM Selectric output printer. I made the sucker play chess really, really badly - hey, I was 16.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  203. Oh, BASIC, you horribly flawed, wonderful thing. by Malkin · · Score: 1

    I had a TRS80 Model I, too! My first program was written in BASIC on a TRS-80 Model I, but I ultimately learned to program in BASIC on the Tandy CoCo 2, using the Color BASIC and Extended Color BASIC books.

    In retrospect, it was a somewhat harrowing way to write any kind of code. We didn't have IDEs. We typed our lines of code straight into the command line, and if we wanted to read the lines we had already written, we had to dump the range we wanted to see to the screen. There was nothing like code completion. We didn't have anywhere to look things up except for whatever books we had on hand. There wasn't any Google, or StackOverflow, or anything like that. Nobody else knew how to program, so there was nobody to ask for help. There weren't any standard libraries for anything... anything at all. My programs had to be saved on cassette tapes. You had to really want to program, but it was such a power trip!

    In my teens, I learned my second language, Pascal.

    (I went on to use 18 other languages, after that!)

  204. TI-BASIC then TI Extended BASIC by CaptainPhoton · · Score: 1

    For sprites and speech synthesizer, Extended BASIC was mandatory! :)

  205. IBM Basic Assembly Language (BAL) by Horus1664 · · Score: 1
    Coding at the control program level on Airline Control Program (ACP)/Transaction Processing Facility (TPF).

    Great fun and very satisfying.

  206. BASIC by MartinSGill · · Score: 1

    My first language was BASIC. Initially on the Texas Instruments TI 99/4A, then on the Commodore 128D. I was 6-8 years old at the time :). Wrote loads of interesting stuff, worked with sprites and simple blocky graphics.

    The first languages I was taught were Pascal and FORTRAN. My first real programming job was in Delphi, and from there (after a very short dip into SmallTalk) I moved onto C++ (with a small bit of Ada thrown in) where I stayed for many years before adding C# into the mix. Somewhere along the way I also learned Java, but never really got into it.

    Since then I've written programs in most mainstream languages, everything from Perl and Python to Java, Javascript and F#.

    The language I remember most fondly is Delphi. Easy and simple on the surface, especially the really easy way to build Windows apps, but with all the power of C++ if you dig deep enough, powerful enough that I got to know and more importantly understand, pointers in Delphi. It's no surprise to me that C# (having the same designer) borrowed so many excellent features from it. I've always considered myself really fortunate that it was Delphi and not Visual Basic that introduced me to Windows programming.

  207. Basic by ma11achy · · Score: 1

    Basic on a Commodore Vic-20

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines
  208. GfA-BASIC by Gunstick · · Score: 1

    A BASIC dialect on AtariST with auto indentation and enforced single command per line and without line numbers.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  209. Extended BASIC. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    It was on an expansion cartridge for our TI-99/4A. I wrote a game in it, nothing terribly complicated or good. Didn't help that the joystick port was broken and only allowed movement left, up, or diagonally left and up.

  210. Well ... there's your problem! by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

    In 2014 Python and Java were the two most commonly-taught languages at America's top universities, according to an analysis published by the Communications of the ACM.

    My first language was BASIC, because I learned it myself for an extra credit math problem using these things called 'computer manuals' every computer room had in the 70s. My second language was FORTRAN, because I learned it myself after I discovered that going to college was a complete waste of money when I could teach myself FORTRAN in a week for the cost of a book instead of paying someone else to do it.

    37 years later, I'm still learning languages by myself from books and now the Internet because going to college to learn programming is a complete waste of money and time for smart people.

    Mediocre people need it because they have to have that little piece of paper that says they know how to pass tests in order to get a job. And people that have been there lie about it to justify their waste of time and money.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  211. BASIC by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    My first language, followed by Turbo Pascal, both still close to my heart even though after 25 years I've moved to Java/C++/C#/Python. Matter of fact, I did some part-time work developing VB and Turbo Pascal/Delphi applications while in college. That certainly helped me through college (another reason why I don't jump on the BASIC or Pascal hate bandwagons.)

  212. My first language? by andywest · · Score: 1

    FORTRAN IV. Yeah, I am that old.

    --
    --- Andy West http://andywest.org
  213. Perl by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    For some reason (probably because it is handy for web programming and has powerful regexps), Perl was my first serious programming language.

  214. BASIC on a ColorComputer III by sundbug · · Score: 1

    Here I learned the intricacies of a tape drive and programming with one (87-88). By the time I reached high school, I was BASIC'd out...I moved on to Objective-C on a NeXT Cube in the early 90s.

  215. Algol by eschasi · · Score: 1

    Unless you want to count various HP programmable calculator keystrokes as being a language. After Algol it was Fortran, some assemblers, snobol, lisp, bliss-10, and others.

  216. A topic to bring out the 4- and 5-digit UID crowd! by Mr+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Nice to see all the old /. greybeards posting!

    Any way, for me it was just enough Basic to get to the C= monitor and have fun with 6502 assembly. Later it was 8086 assembly, then enough C on the old MSC compiler to get into a lot of trouble. The first language I sat down and really tried to learn was Modula-2, and later some Oberon.

    --
    -> I dislike sigs...
  217. Since BASIC seems to be unacceptable - COBOL by cjmnews · · Score: 1

    TRS-80 Model 3 with dual floppy drives, took 30-45 minutes to compile COBOL programs. So you had 1 maybe 2 shots to compile and run.

    Interestingly enough, COBOL is not on my resume.

    --
    You can lose something that is loose, so tighten the loose item so you don't lose it.
  218. Turing by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    My first 'formal' computer programming training was in High School, using a language developed at the University of Toronto called Turing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    It was a cute little language, and I remember doing some fun stuff in it, including some basic 3d wireframe engine work. Which was pretty exciting stuff in high school computer programming in the early 90s on a 386.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  219. IBM 1620 machine language by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Yes, really. Machine language. Not even assembler. Punching numeric codes into cards. The 1620 was a decimal computer, so that wasn't quite as mind-bending as an octal or hexadecimal machine language would have been. That was in high school; computers in schools were still a rare thing in those days (1971). The 1620 was already an antique by then; in the fall the school replaced it with a less-antique 1130 because IBM was no longer willing to rent out the 1620. (IBM had run out of people who knew how to fix them and they were probably running low on spare parts as well; they hadn't made the system for years, so any spares they had were removed from decommissioned computers.)

    Second language: Fortran. Also on the 1620.

  220. My first programming language by Bitbeisser · · Score: 1

    First programming language I learned was Pascal. First on paper only, then on a DEC PDP-8, way back in '76. Then used 6502 assembly (by hand) on a KIM-1, my first own computer...

  221. TINT (JOVIAL), 1968 by Craig+Milo+Rogers · · Score: 1

    In 1968, my father brought home the user manual for TINT, the Timeshared INTerpreter for JTS, JOVIAL for Time Sharing. The rule of the house was that I could read anything except the books on abnormal psychology (and I didn't want to read those, they were yucky). I read the TINT manual, and said, "I can do that." A few months later, my father brought me in for a few hours to where he worked, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. I demonstrated sufficient proficiency on the AN-FSQ/32 timesharing system to have passed the programming class, had I taken it. In 1970, I spent some of the summer working at UCLA, translating statistical programs from JOVIAL to FORTRAN (F40 on the DEC PDP-10). In 1971, I was old enough to be paid as a programmer, working on statistics programs, novel user interfaces, and operating system modifications. I never did learn how to flip burgers or serve ice cream, like my high school friends did.

    JOVIAL (Jules Own Version of the International Algorithmic Language) was an ALGOL-class language created to program US Air Force systems, such as SAGE (the Strategic Air Ground Environment), starting in 1958. System Development Corporation (SDC) was the world's first software company. DEC built the most fun computers in the 1960's and 1970's. UCLA is the home of the Bruins.

    --
    Craig Milo Rogers
  222. Re:Fortran / Algol by petervandervos · · Score: 1

    My first program was the Sieve of Eratosthenes in Algol 68 in 1978. After handing in your punch cards you had to wait 3 hours before you got your results, of some syntax errors.

  223. Fortran by Corneil · · Score: 1

    In 1981 with computer studies in high school we started with mainframe assembler and COBOL, I was on the verge of quitting when we started Fortran. I realized the power of computing and the rest is history.

    --
    He who experiments learns much but reboots/reinstalls often.
  224. First? Programming Language? by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    In 1985 I was using the DEBUG command to create .COM programs, Does this count as a programming language?

    About the same time, I started creating games in BASIC, but this was for a hobby. My elementary school had a course teaching Turtle with simple instructions (pen up / down, turn left / right by certain degrees, change pen color, move forward / backward a certain distance, etc). Was this my first programming language?

    My first ISCS class at university used Smalltalk. While I was on my 2-year mission, IS and CS separated and the first CS class used Java. Subsequent classes used C, C++. Eventually we could use any language we chose.

  225. Machine Language by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    My first "language" were hardware opcodes on an IBM 1620. I was in high school in the early 70s and a local government lab gave school access to the system which was still maintained by IBM at that time. It had a typewriter and a card reader/punch. You could enter instructions through the typewriter or read them in through cards.

    Each op-code had two decimal digits and up to two parameters. No registers as such operations were memory-to-memory. There were 20K words each 6 bits -- 4 for BCD and two flag bits. Core memory of course.

    Always fun that in order to do arithmetic you had to pre-load the addition table. The architecture was decimal-based and did not include hardware addition logic. For that reason the system earned the name "CADET" (Can't Add Doesn't Even Try).

    There was a FORTRAN II compiler for it that we didn't use much except to try it. It was a multi-pass compiler and it would punch out intermediate steps on cards that you had to feed back in to perform the next pass. Good times.

  226. Re:Old people will probably say BASIC by naris · · Score: 1

    I have a friend whose first "programming language" was plugging in wires...

  227. Fortran 62 by Thorson · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'm really that old.

    1. Re:Fortran 62 by Thorson · · Score: 1

      I'll add the very first program I wrote was in octal entered via the console of a CDC 1604.

  228. BASIC/C/Pascal by tmshort · · Score: 1

    Learned BASIC at summer camp on a TRS-80 Model 1, then my father got a Model 3, then I eventually got a TI-99/4A.
    In high school they had BASIC classes, but I learned C on the PDP-11/70 running Unix from friends at school. My first C program was very BASIC-like. Once I got a PC, I started dealing with 8086 Assembly (and totally doing frame setup wrong). Learned Pascal to take the Computer Science AP class.
    In college, I ended up having to take the low-level intro to programming class, despite my AP scores, because they added "two weeks of FORTRAN" at the end of the class. I got to skip the Data Structures due to AP, but ended up taking classes in 8086 Assembly, Ada, 68K Assembly, SQL and Scheme. Started learning C++ on my own around this time, too.
    On my first job, learned just enough AMD 29K assembly before they cancelled the project.
    Learned Java while taking classes for my masters program.
    After that, learned Perl for scripting a source control server.
    I've picked up a little bit of python at my current job.

    1. Re:BASIC/C/Pascal by tmshort · · Score: 1

      I think in middle school they tried to teach Logo programming, so that may have been my true programming first experience.
      And of course, I'll throw JavaScipt in there during the web's early heydays.

  229. PL/I was the first language I learned...but before by JRHodel · · Score: 1

    Before PL/I I used to key in octal commands to enable a Digital computer to bootstrap the OS, which was on punch tape. This was in the mid-1970s.

    In publishing punch tape was a common data transmission source inside a shop, so using it for the OS and code was a no brainer. Plus 6 level and 8 level tape gave you two common byte sizes.

    I enrolled in a BS/CS program in 1980 which used PL/I as the main instructional language. I never used it professionally, but it was common in Grad School too.

    --
    Think of the Irony!
  230. First Programming Language? by Agripa · · Score: 1

    8080 machine code and hand assembly programmed into EPROMs via a Prolog programmer. After that it was Z80 macro assembler on a CP/M system with floppy disk drives.

  231. Python by Lauriy · · Score: 1

    University, 2009.

  232. FORTRAN, Adventure and adventures in hacking by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Aside from BASIC and 8080/Z80, FORTRAN.

    FORTRAN was -- for some still is-- the 'Perl' of scientific computing. Get it in and get it done... and it doesn't always compile down very tight, but always fast because for mainframe developers getting this language optimized for a new architecture was first priority.

    At 15, the first real structured program I ever de-constructed completely while teaching myself the language, was the FORTRAN IV source for Crowther and Woods Colossal Cave Adventure, widely regarded as 'the' original interactive text adventure, a genre which would later go multi-user to become the MUD. Read about it here, or play it in Javascript.

    FORTRAN IV and Dartmouth BASIC (I'll toss in RPG II also) were the 'flat' GOTO-based languages, an era of explicit rather than implicit nesting -- a time in which high level functions were available to use or define but humans needed to plan and implement the actual structure in programs mentally by using conditional statements and labels to JUMP over blocks of code. Sort of "assembly language with benefits".

    Crowther's PDP-11 Adventure version was running on the 36-bit GE-600 mainframes of GEISCO (General Electric Information Services) Mark III Foreground timesharing system... this is in the golden age of timesharing and no one did it better than GE. It took HOURS at 300bps and two rolls of thermal paper to print out the source and data files, and I the Adventure code and data out on the floor and traced the program mentally, keeping a notebook of what was stored in what variable... I had far more fun doing this than playing the game itself.

    Then the "real life" adventure began. I started poking around on the Mark III timesharing system, and found a way to jump out of my partitioned access and explore. What really helped was a collection of FORTRAN/77 system utilities written by an engineer working at GEISCO (this is General Electric, no relation to GEICO and the year is ~1980). Their development environment as well as the commercial systems were controlled by password protected accounts, each with file/user areas... BUT there was also this command line debugger that was able to write to memory regions beyond your own job, and if you were able to parse out memory structures (reading source for the utilities helped) you could "punch yourself in" to any user number (location), effectively changing identity to that of another user and seeing their files. Or examine the buffers containing character streams of other users' terminals in real time. It was fascinating and I soon had developed a suite of tools in F77 to assist in exploration of the system, leap-frogging onto the commercial file systems too. I kept the source encrypted by the F77 'SCRAM' function, decrypting it only to edit and compile. My cache of tools was stored "in" a user number that did not exist, you can think of it as a unpointed-to lost cluster of sorts. I was totally white hat about it, never prying into customer files (McDonald's etc.) and even wrote a summary of vulnerabilities and dropped it into one of their secure areas. I just wanted to be hired. Cat 'n mouse games ensued, even a trace and FBI phone tap. GEISCO originally thought I was a rogue employee but when they learned I was just a kid the heat was off, they were afraid of public embarrassment. They bought me a plane ticket to Rockville MD so they could pick my brain, and the matter was closed soon after. I was not hired.

    Lots of people have played Colossal Cave Adventure over the years, but in my mind the game is synonymous with the Mark III timesharing system itself, that was the biggest cave of all.

    I had write access to their entire network. What did I do with my "superpower"? Well for one thing, I scanned to find ALL copies of Colossal Cave Adventure on their system, there were about a dozen that had been

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  233. Report Program Generator (RPG) by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1

    Or as I liked to call it. Random Problem Generator.
    Worse than Cobol and Fortran combined.

    --
    The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
  234. BASIC by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Don't know what version, but it was on a time-sharing (a sort of antediluvian version of "the cloud"), and at first, program storage was on paper tape.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  235. Machine Language by rsurtees · · Score: 1

    There was no programming language for the NCR Elliott 405 that I first wrote programs for in the 1950's in Sydney, Australia. It was considered to be the first commercial computer in Australia. Everything had to be written in machine language because there was no compiler. The only software available on the machine were two programs named Roger and Albert both of which were on paper tape. Albert's only function was to set the computer up to read Roger which allowed one to create a program in assembler. The resulting program could the be punched out onto paper tape. I just wish that I could find the manual for it now but am unable to locate it anywhere.

  236. Perl by vernonB · · Score: 1

    circa 1996, started teaching myself Perl in order to write CGI scripts to hook up a data source to an HTML form.

  237. TI-5x calculator opcodes by userw014 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the TI-58/TI-59 opcode set. I think earlier Texas Instruments TI calculators in the 5x series shared opcodes - but I'm not sure.

    Think of it as an adjustable Harvard machine architecture. Programming in a language that was written like APL (special keyboard) and read like machine language.

  238. Re:Basic - on a VIC 20. by chasvircio · · Score: 1

    Not knowing that BASIC was not necessarily BASIC, I used a programming manual for the TRS 80. That's how I learned to do work-arounds...

  239. Basic, Pascal, Fortran and Lisp by deleteit · · Score: 1

    In their order of learning, the very first was Basic v2.0, used a good 4 to 5 years, then inside the same year I learned: Turbo Pascal, Fortran and Lisp. Then thankfully, I turned away from the dark side of the force and ditched programming all together to switch toward systems and networking ;-)

  240. BASIC by torinakamori · · Score: 1

    As a child - long time ago - I met "basic" atari. Several programming languages along the way and ... nothing to do with this. I do not even improve PHP anymore. Now I only write blogs: Social Media Marketing and Very normal travel blog Ciekawe miejsca w Polsce What you can see interesting in Poland (castles, palaces, sacral objects, museums etc)