Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek Enterprise Tidbits

Carlo di Bonk writes: "I found a good article about the new Star Trek Enterprise television evil forces. These evil villains are from the future and the mirror universe. It seems to be an interesting chance that it is a different mirror universe though, to one seen in Star Trek The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and other Star Trek television." Lots of little plot bits too, like the fact that they will have transporters, but they won't be trusted because they randomly kill people (like the first movie!) With Farscape running start to finish, my copy of Lexx Season 1 on DVD en route, and the new Star Trek a few weeks away, I think I need to take a week off ... a scifi sabbatical ;)

399 comments

  1. Did I miss an episode of TNG? by bero-rh · · Score: 2

    a different mirror universe though, to one seen in Star Trek The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and other Star Trek television

    When was the TOS/DS9 mirror universe shown on ST:TNG?

    --
    This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
    1. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

      It wasn't. But it was covered in a damned good book - Dark Mirror. So, yeah, the statement made above was somewhat incorrect.


      If you haven't read Dark Mirror, or don't read most Star Trek books in general - go ahead and read it. It's a very good story that I would have loved to have seen done in the series, or better yet, as a movie!


      --

      Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    2. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      When was the TOS/DS9 mirror universe shown on ST:TNG?

      uuuhhh...I thought ST:TNG WAS the evil mirror universe...

    3. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't actually ENTER Uranus, they send a probe!

    4. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by tb3 · · Score: 3, Funny
      The article refers to it as a a side-line mirror universe


      Is that like a vanity-mirror universe?

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    5. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the alternate Riker?

    6. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      heh, Wesley Crusher, heh

    7. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, Prof Farnsworth already explained that! The scientists union got tired of all those puerile jokes about "your anus" so they changed the name to Urectum! You'd figure geeks would be up to date on astronomical matters!

    8. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was the result of a "split" transporter beam caused by a refliguation of the atmosphere in the manetoibonisphere. This only happens every 7.29 years, when the local star emits vermitogone particles, leading to a 92.1% increase in the mesonimyson flux ratio. Duh.

      Cpt_Kirks

    9. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some consider that as the episode with the Battle-ship Enterprise in war with the Klingons.

    10. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      That's a new one on me - the mirror Mirror universe (to use the TOS episode title) was an alternate universe with a warlike Empire instead of a Federation - which fell when Kirk convinced alternate-Spock to give peace a chance.

      This is not the Yesterday's Enterprise universe, a straightforward (?) alternate timeline where the Federation/Klingon peace talks failed.

      Note that Mirror Mirror was set long before the Khitomer talks.

      Maybe I'm just confused. All these alternate universes and alternate realities!

      ...laura

    11. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by John+F.+Ketamine · · Score: 1

      That was the funniest thing I've ever read. MOD UP!

      --
      "Upgrade your grey matter, 'cause one day it may matter." --Deltron Zero
    12. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      wasnt q from an alternate Universe?

      --

      ________________________________________________

    13. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      The star trek books are of a much higher quality than most of the episodes, IMHO - Plus, its much more fun to interpret the events in your own view. And many of the books i've read recently don't give away the ending too early in the book, either.

      I've recently read 3 of the "Section 31" books. A very interesting way of explaining certain things in the star trek timeline.

    14. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You suppose Spock was succesful
      2) Khitomer talks break down and flow that time-line into the other universe. As Spock mentions (Guardian of Time) Time is Fluid, and so that is how these alternate universes flow together and apart and creating seeming consistencies and inconsistencies. Remember Spock was mentioning how it was so coincident that Kirk and Spock went to the same place McCoy landed at.

      Anyway no one ever accused me of playing "Continuity Cop", its all contravance to me.

    15. Re:Did I miss an episode of TNG? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      According to the alternate Kira on DS9, Spock was successful. That's how the Bajorans (who wre not at all interested in peace) took over the Empire and made humans slaves.

      ...laura

  2. WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Is what /. would have said if they had any inkling of a conscience.

  3. Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > With Farscape running start to finish, my copy
    > of Lexx Season 1 on DVD en route, and the new
    > Star Trek a few weeks away, I think I need to
    > take a week off ...

    And what exactly is it that you do???

    1. Re:Ummm... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      > With Farscape running start to finish, my copy
      > of Lexx Season 1 on DVD en route, and the new
      > Star Trek a few weeks away, I think I need to
      > take a week off ...

      And what exactly is it that you do???


      He's Vice-President of New Technologies. It's important that he keep up with tomorrow's tech headlines.

  4. still nothing as good as .... by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    the original ST series .... all the chicks in those mini-dresses, yowzaa!

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:still nothing as good as .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn raciscist!
      Green chix r0x0r!

    2. Re:still nothing as good as .... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 5, Funny

      the original ST series .... all the chicks in those mini-dresses, yowzaa!

      I like the alternate universe from Deep Space 9 where ALL the hot chicks are lesbians! Woot! Set phasers for XXX Action!

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    3. Re:still nothing as good as .... by Scutter · · Score: 1

      The problem with your basic lesbian, see, is that they don't like men. Your typical male ST geek doesn't get enough action in a (predominantly) non-lesbian universe. How bad would that suck to be in one where the women are *all* lesbians?

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    4. Re:still nothing as good as .... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I want the Glen Glen sound FX!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:still nothing as good as .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Mirror-Kira went both ways, and Mirror Dax was straight.

    6. Re:still nothing as good as .... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      That mirror universe is actually the fruition of our current course of evolution. Trekkies will eventually take over the world. No women will want to sleep with them, for obvious reasons (a humourous Comcast cable commercial comes to mind.) The women will all give up on men and begin using DNA Sequencing technologies to conceive more humans. etc, etc. :)

    7. Re:still nothing as good as .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All true geeks falsely believe they can "turn" a lesbian, and get a "bi" instead!

    8. Re:still nothing as good as .... by Megahurts · · Score: 1

      " The problem with your basic lesbian, see, is that they don't like men. Your typical male ST geek doesn't get enough action in a (predominantly) non-lesbian universe. How bad would that suck to be in one where the women are *all* lesbians? "

      heh. I just happened to see an old episode of friends the other night where ross's lesian wife was getting married to her lover. Joey and Chandler were standing around and Joey says "Man, all these hot chick and no chance with any of them... what a waste of potential." to which Chandler looks at him funny and replies "The WHOLE WORLD is alesbian wedding to me!"

  5. Alternate universes in the pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez! Alternate universes straight away?! Shouldn't they kick around for at least one episode and establish themselves a little?

  6. Re:French Toast! by Juan+Epstein · · Score: 0

    A/S/L?

    --
    Have you flamed SpanishInquisition t
  7. The costumes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they wear costumes more similar to those in TOS than those in TNG? I mean, just think about those skirts ;)

  8. First episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just hope the first episode is called "The Ass Menagerie"

    1. Re:First episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell "Commander Taco" to stop winking in his supposedly 'witty' remarks. They are annoying as are his worthless opinions.

  9. Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Trek? by tenzig_112 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Silicon-based life forms protest the Star Trek premiere for its aparent xenophobia.


    "There are simply not television shows featuring silicon-based characters on your earth television. Sure, there is the occasional silicon-based token character- usually just a humanoid who claims to be made of silicon. But it very often dies in the first ten minutes of an episode. That is wrong and we wish to see that rectified."


    "... In truth the science fiction industry has done a lousy job of representing non-human species. A glob of putty on the nose here, a pointed ear there and presto- an alien. Even the shows that strive for some level of originality stick human-centric arms and legs on them."



    full story:
    http://www.ridiculopathy.com/news_detail.php?displ ay=20010829
  10. Question by schnitzi · · Score: 3, Funny

    How many times can people from a parallel universe visit ours before we start considering this parallel universe part of our own? Sheesh, these parallel universe people are starting to outnumber Klingons.

    The only way Trek could be any worse would be if it was sung.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only way Trek could be any worse would be if it was sung. "

      That would make it a true space opera.

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trek Rock? I like the sound of that!

      So you say you are a Klingon?
      A race of agressive wart-heads.
      Well, we are the Federation
      And we strive to make all other races dead!

    3. Re:Question by tb3 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Not sure if this is what you had in mind but this tidbit comes from the scifi wire website:

      Paramount has chosen English opera star Russell Watson to cover the Rod Stewart tune Faith of the Heart as the opening theme music of UPN's upcoming Enterprise series.


      Is that close enough to a Star Trek musical?

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:Question by IronChef · · Score: 2


      The parallel universe was the coolest thing in the original Trek episode, and it was nice to see it revisited in DS9... ONCE. But they are indeed going too far now.

      The only way Trek could be any worse would be if it was sung.

      After watching the 60 sec clip at startrek.com I am actually more jazzed about this show than ever. I always thought the prequel idea had a lot of merit, and the clip shows me that the producers "get it," at least a little. More than I thought they would, anyway. (no spandex, and people are wearing BALL CAPS. Crazy.)

      Watch the clip, you might find that it's better than you expected. (Of course, I couldn't view the clip on Win2k because it is Quicktime. Reinstalling QT didn't help, I had to open up the Mac and watch it there.)

      Of course the show can still suck ass. A good teaser proves nothing. But it gives me hope. (when, oh WHEN will I learn NOT TO TRUST THE CLIP? I have been burned too often.)

    5. Re:Question by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      "Star Treking across universe..."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Question by alumshubby · · Score: 2

      That would give a whole new meaning to the phrase "space opera"!

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    7. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you find reverse yet?

      "There's Klingons off the starboard bow"
      "It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim!"
      "It's life, Jim, but not as we know it"
      "We come in peace -- shoot to kill!"
      "Ye canna change the laws o' physics!"

    8. Re:Question by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • The parallel universe was the coolest thing in the original Trek episode, and it was nice to see it revisited in DS9... ONCE. But they are indeed going too far now

      Considering that it's already been parodied in South Park, I'd say that using it again demonstrates that either the producers are morons, or they assume that we are. Or heck, maybe it's both.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:Question by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Anyone feel like converting this clip to something that doesn't require proprietary software to view? MPEG is nice.

    10. Re:Question by zonker · · Score: 0

      Aww! I've been trying to find out who wrote that song for years now. Silly stuff. Anyone know who did it? I just downloaded a WAV file of it, I dunno, years ago though and I've always wondered who did it...

  11. Peace and Love? by Caraig · · Score: 1

    From the original article:


    These human supremacists don't want the soft liberal peace and love Federation of Kirk and the Next Generation's universe coming into fruition,[...]

    Peace and love? Kirk? I mean, besides the fact that he didn't always limit himself to homo sapiens, Kirk kicked butt and took names, he wasn't representative of any 'peace and love Federation.' Yeah, he met some hippies, but It's hard to see the 'Space Hippies' taking over the Feds. =)

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    1. Re:Peace and Love? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but at least Kirk *pretended* to be peaceful.

      "Alien..general we.......meanyounoharm (Sulu ready phasers)....Our culture is.......one of peace and........tranquility (Spock get a lock on).......We can settle......our differences.....peacefully....FIRE!"

    2. Re:Peace and Love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "These human supremacists don't want the soft liberal peace and love..."


      So in this alternate universe, Dubya gets a second term, huh? Is that where he abolishes the constitution and creates the great United Imperial States with him as God-Emporer?

    3. Re:Peace and Love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill ..." -- 'Kirk', in a song on a Dr. Demento album.

  12. UPN :-( by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    Ugh, the new trek is on UPN, which isn't a part of Time-Warner Cable in Cincinnati. I gotta get out an antenna and try to get UPN outta neighboring cities. Talk about lame...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:UPN :-( by comeonpilgrim · · Score: 1

      UPN is on TW now. Channel 20 for like four hours a night. http://www.twcinci.com/Cable/UPN_Press.asp

    2. Re:UPN :-( by Chakat · · Score: 1
      I gotta get out an antenna and try to get UPN outta neighboring cities. Talk about lame...

      Not as lame as the boat I'm in. For an antenna, I've got a resistor, a coat hanger, and a $20 radio shack signal amplifier. Seriously. I'd flash up a picture for one and all, but my digital camera is unavailable at the moment. Though I think you should bash heads at TW to get them to start carrying your local UPN affiliate.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    3. Re:UPN :-( by Mister+Black · · Score: 1

      TimeWarner here in Austin did a major reshuffle of the channels and also added a UPN channel as well as a bunch of other garbage. I guess my Buffy watching friends complained enought that TimeWarner added UPN rather than listen to them bitch. Maybe TW-Cinci has the same thing in store.

      --

      You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here.
    4. Re:UPN :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just wait for it to be repeated on all the other channels?

      Patience my dear boy! Patience!

    5. Re:UPN :-( by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could contact your cable provider and attempt to petition the addition of UPN to the lineup?

      UPN had very little to offer in the beginning (Voyager was it, IIRC -- and even that was a stretch), but with Enterprise coming on as well as their aquisition of Buffy and Roswell it might start getting into higher demand.

      Or you might see a case where Enterprise is shown by a local affiliate of some other network channel. That often happened with Voyager in places where the cable provider did not offer UPN.

    6. Re:UPN :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so much that as the fact that KBEJ in Fredericksburg started up and brought UPN to the area. They're situated such that they can pump their signal into both markets and probably demand must-carry too.

      It's basically a puppet of KENS here in town, but that's the new world order for you.

    7. Re:UPN :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The deal is that if there's a local broadcast station, then cable companies must carry them. However, every other channel (ESPN3, The Golf Network, etc) pays the cable company for transit. [That's also why most cable systems have 20% of their channelspace dedicated to low wattaage UHF crap like foriegn language and shopping channels.]

      Therefore, they won't carry UPN unless there's a local broadcaster in the area. The people to petition are UPN. They need to spend some money and get into all of the big second tier markets (like Cincinnati). They could easily buy out Mr Lowwatt Espanol with a UHF antenna and then get on cable.

    8. Re:UPN :-( by johnstewart · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if these might be available with edonkey (www.edonkey2000.com)?

      If you've not seen it, check out the MST3K Digital Archive Project! www.mst3kdap.org

      Using edonkey, you can get a ton of the old episodes, sized to just fit on CD.

      Anyone want to post the show for those of us without UPN?

  13. The Kirk spirit by shd99004 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will the captains be like those from TNG or VOY, or will they have that attitude, more like Kirk had?

    --
    Will work for bandwidth
    1. Re:The Kirk spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like Christopher Pike, I think - less known about Out There, so you unwittingly take more chances, get more amazed by what you find.

    2. Re:The Kirk spirit by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 1

      According to early reports, the characters in Enterprise would seem to embody tons of the 'Kirk Spirit'.

      These are the first people to trot around the galaxy at warp speed(from Earth). They wanna have fun and explore. And since it's before any 'prime directive', they seem to be quite free to kick some arse as the need arises.

      - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.

      - AC

    3. Re:The Kirk spirit by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      I think it was good that Picard was a little more wussy. It fit with the look and character, and made for a nice change, and great contrast with Riker. Sisko was annoying in his subservience. Janeway needed more balls. Figuratively, and probably literally. I don't want to see the trend continue.

  14. Must... see... soon... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm dying to watch Enterprise. While I've heard a couple of people say it's gonna suck, I really think it's possible it may end up being the best Trek yet.


    The future isnt' so far way in Enterprise - it's going to be easier, IMHO, to relate to the universe in the Enterprise series than it was in ST:TNG (and definitely easier to relate to than Voyager. Blah.) I also think they may have a chance to make statements about humanity in general again. Voyager pretty much never did it, and DS9 didn't make much of an effort.


    But, of course, that's just my opinion. No matter how good or bad it is, someone is gonna say it sucks compaired to (TOS, TNG, DS9, V, TAS ;-)


    The bad guys however - this could be interesting. I do hope they are used sparingly like they did the Borg for a while, instead of every episode centering around trying to duke it out with them.


    Everyone cross your fingers, and hope they manage to get this series right!


    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    1. Re:Must... see... soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and best yet, we can see how communist GNU ideals transformed the world into the super-technological utopia that it is in ST!

    2. Re:Must... see... soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, it'll suck. The reason? Scott Bakula.

    3. Re:Must... see... soon... by oliverk · · Score: 1

      Bah, Voyager. If someone says Enterprise sucks in comparison to that--hoo-boy we're in trouble...

      --
      ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
  15. Anyone ready to place bets... by Masem · · Score: 5, Funny
    on how long into the series until Bakula's character has to say "Oh, boy!"?

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Anyone ready to place bets... by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      will they make "Al" of quantum leap first officer? that would be nice and confusing

      --

      ________________________________________________

    2. Re:Anyone ready to place bets... by Van+Halen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This interview pretty much answers both of your questions:

      Q: Have you heard from Dean [Stockwell] since you got the role?

      SB: No. He called me on Father's Day,but we missed. I have not talked to him. But wouldn't that be great if we could get him on [as a guest on Enterprise]? It has to be; we've got to do it. But put him in a big mask so he can be miserable for once! [Laughs]

      Q: Are they telling you to avoid anything? Like, don't say, "Oh boy."

      SB: They haven't written it on the page, and I won't be ad-libbing it! [Laughs] No, I'm not avoiding anything. Certainly, if we got to a place where Dean was a part of a show, that would be walking a very thin line if he was a guest. But no, there's no directive about, "Scott don't do this" and I'm not really watching myself. Look, a lot of Sam Beckett was a part of me, and a lot of this captain is a part of me -- I haven't split off personalities between then and now. There will be similarities. I'm just older.

      Pretty interesting stuff.

    3. Re:Anyone ready to place bets... by fellini8.5 · · Score: 1

      Naw, but at the end of the final episode, he'll wake up in bed next to Susan Pleshette... Oh wait, wrong crossover...

      --
      Kineska: Cinema, soapbox, music & musings
    4. Re:Anyone ready to place bets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys keep forgetting the "Time travel" episodes....

      They're going to be really confused....use a quantum accelerator or just use the tried and true method of the starship slingshot around the sun?

  16. Transporters that Kill: by AMuse · · Score: 5, Funny

    they will have transporters, but they won't be trusted because they randomly kill people

    Cool! Just like the Muni buses in San Francisco. :>

  17. Babylon 5 on dvd anyone? by wubboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just wondering if anyone knows about a dvd release of the B5 series?

    --
    Sit... Speak.... Shake.... Good Dog!
    1. Re:Babylon 5 on dvd anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ok maybe offtopic by the most stringent standards, but this is not hardly as off topic as most of the slashdot posts get and still on topic if you consider the topic to be TV, SCI-FI, or even the listed "from the only-a-few-weeks-away dept."

      By the time you moderated this down, more, less-meaningful stuff has been posted..


      Spend time looking for the good stuff, the offtopic items will clear themselves out soon enough.



      Anyway I thought I saw a december release of season one.. IMBW

  18. Contrived plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems to me that this plot is too contrived to be taken seriously. "evil mirror-villains from the future"?? Isn't that the plot to "Power Rangers: Time Force!"?

    The other shows all had simple, realistic premises-the Enterprise is exploring the universe, Voyager is trying to get back home, the Enterprise is exploring the universe with a much crappier crew.

    Anyway, the point of this is that clearly the plot is degenerating as new shows are produced. This obviously means that each successive "Star Trek" show is worse than the last. This means that Kirk is much, much better than Picard. QED.

    1. Re:Contrived plot by Kanon · · Score: 1

      Nah. In Power Rangers the monsters are more realistic :)

  19. Egad, I hope not! by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Troll

    I fevently hope this article is pure BS! I am so damn tired of every Star Drek show being TimeTraveling Baddies From An Alternate Universe®. I was hoping, from the trailers, that Enterprise was going to be more like the STTOS. If this article is even half correct, then it's time to take the Star Trek universe and put a stake through its heart, fill its mouth with garlic bulbs, cut its head off with a gravedigger's shovel, and bury it at a crossroads in blessed ground.

    1. Re:Egad, I hope not! by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Upon consideration, I can thing of exactly one case in which I would accept TimeTraveling Baddies From An Alternate Universe® in the Star Trek Universe.

      However, this is somewhat unlikely to happen until CGI gets much better at rendering teeth and curls....

    2. Re:Egad, I hope not! by Spotless+Tiger · · Score: 1

      It's ok. They have some other plots lined up, such as one episode where the crew's minds are taken over by a mysterious invisible alien force, and another where an android gets trapped on the holodeck (by travelling through time to the days of DS9, etc, obviously) and then cannot tell for sure if the surroundings are real or just holographic.

      Exciting stuff. I can't wait to see it...

      --
      Racists should be sent back to where they came from
    3. Re:Egad, I hope not! by Spotless+Tiger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, before I forget. The subplot involving the android is that he wants to have feelings, and much of the show will be about the amusing quest he faces reconsiling his digital logical self, and the emotional maturity of humanity. He has pointy ears too.

      --
      Racists should be sent back to where they came from
  20. Klingons by x24 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "...humanity gets to meet its first Klingon. Said knobbly faced warrior..."

    I was wondering if they were going to use the forehead-ridged Klingons or the pansy Romulan-wannabes from TOS.

    1. Re:Klingons by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      I'm glad they're going this way. The human-except-for-pointy-ears-and-bad-moustaches Klingons (loved those sparkly vests though) were pretty bad (they just looked like they never bathed).

      I think it is a smart move to just go with the "bumpy" Klingon design. (plus, what about all those guys who have invested _years_ in learning to speak Klingonese and dress up like Whorf and stuff?)

    2. Re:Klingons by schon · · Score: 1

      I think it is a smart move to just go with the "bumpy" Klingon design.

      Yeah, but how do you reconcile that with the DS9 version of "Trouble with Tribbles?" where it's outright said that TNG klingons don't look like TOS ones?

    3. Re:Klingons by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      That's just it. I'm not intent on reconciling every difference between ST shows, and neither are the producers of the new show, thank god.

    4. Re:Klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't say that. When Worf was questioned, he said that he didn't want to discuss it.

      Besides, the bumpy headed Klingons were first introduced in Star Trek : The Motion Picture which was _during_ Kirk's time and is classified as a continuation of TOS.

  21. Re:Nice code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you read the HTTP MFC? 200 is a successful response. The code works fine! Duh!

  22. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by ReidMaynard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hasn't ST discovered Hollywood by now? Pleanty of silicon there ....

    Rest easy, I'm sure big fake hooters are on the way ....

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  23. Star Trek: The Musical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    (sung to the tune of the old Batman show)
    Star TREK!

    nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh

    STAR TREK!

    nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh

    STAR TREK!

    STAR TREK!

    Staaaar Treeeeek!


    repeat ad nauseum ... or until a PUD (parallel universe dude) locks you in the holideck and turns off off the safety overrides.


    Anonymous Kev

    proudly posting as Anonymous Coward since 1997

  24. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by cactopus · · Score: 1

    Yeah bring back the Tholians!

    ...or Gorn

    AJ

  25. sign of a true geek by Proud+Geek · · Score: 2

    That's how I can always tell who a TRUE geek is. We were the only ones who watched Voyager, anyway. Hopefully this one will have at least enough appeal to non-geeks to keep it on the air everywhere.

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

    1. Re:sign of a true geek by geekoid · · Score: 2

      GEEK != watch crappy show because it makes us a geek.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:sign of a true geek by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • That's how I can always tell who a TRUE geek is. We were the only ones who watched Voyager, anyway

      Yes, the Particle of the Week, consistent inconsistencies, and dumbing down (watch the spandex clad titties bounce, morons) really helped to appeal to that tiny but vital hard core geek audience, at the expense of the massive WWF Bitchslap lovin' Joe Sixpacks that every other prime time show relies on. Doofus.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:sign of a true geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a Star Trek fanboy doesn't mean you're a "true" geek. It was a TV show. A bad one. No reason to make yourself feel more l33t because you were the only one who watched it regularly (and maybe actually liked it).

    4. Re:sign of a true geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's how I can always tell who a TRUE geek is. We were the only ones who watched Voyager, anyway

      No... people who watched Voyager were geeks with taste for 5h17. Geeks with good taste stopped watching TNG when the asinine holodeck became a regular feature.


  26. A prediction by shd99004 · · Score: 1

    Somehow, I don't think Harry Mudd-like characters will be that common in this show...

    --
    Will work for bandwidth
    1. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..which is *really too bad; Harry Mudd's episodes were some of the best they had. A clever but pleasant rogue makes a good foil.

  27. Hortas! by wiredog · · Score: 4, Funny

    They were silicon based, turned out to be good guys, and had no manipulative digits. Looked like dog vomit, from a large dog, though.

    1. Re:Hortas! by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      Yep. That's one (example). I'm struggling to think of another (recent) one.

      Of course, the challenge is to develop some kind of believable alien life form that is not humanoid in some way or another, and still have that character be able to convey some meaningful interaction with the main characters who are, human or humanoid.

      Hortas, IIRC, could only communicate by burning their message into rock (no kill i?). 'course it is handy if you have Spock around (just how the hell do you 'mind meld' with a creature made of rock, anyway?)

    2. Re:Hortas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of DS9's shapeshifters and the wormhole aliens. Shapeshifters are naturally a pool of liquid, and all we ever saw of The Prophets were *avatars* - never saw the real deal.

      TNG had that crystalline lifeform that trashed planets, and the huge living spaceship. I suppose one could call Qs' appearances just avatars, we never saw what they *really* looked like, just what they thought we could understand..

    3. Re:Hortas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hortas..... that name just sounds like something you'd find on the menu at a Tex-Mex restaraunt.

    4. Re:Hortas! by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      just how the hell do you 'mind meld' with a creature made of rock, anyway?
      I guess the same way you do it with ugly bags of mostly water.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    5. Re:Hortas! by way2slo · · Score: 1

      From the episode "Devil in the Dark". Dog vomit is a pretty good description. I always thought they looked like a sausage pizza baked on a shag carpet that was draped over a guy crawling around on all fours. That is one of my favorite episodes. I gotta find that one on DVD sometime. :)

    6. Re:Hortas! by andrewski · · Score: 1

      I always thought they looked like a pepperoni pizza, myself, but to each his own.

  28. Here's a mirror universe for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right here.

    OK, it doesn't work yet, but come on guys, this will be funny once the story gets archived by slashdot and cached by google. Let's see if you moderators can make the leap and transcend the boundary of time.

  29. fOh er cryin out loud. by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

    Is that plot the best they can come up with? Couldn't they leave Time Travel alone for just a few episodes?

    This series sounds wretched.

  30. It would be dumb... by AUSketch · · Score: 1

    for them to put it on anything else. Think about it. UPN is Paramount's network, and Star Trek is made by Paramount. Star Trek is really the only thing UPN has going for it, so if there wasn't a ST there, the network would die.....fast.

    1. Re:It would be dumb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the highest rated UPN program is WWF Smackdown. So, its a bit more important.

  31. already have continuity errors by geekoid · · Score: 2

    early Klingons have been established to NOT have bumps. This was in TNG.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:already have continuity errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was DS9 where they visit the space station in TOS's "Trouble with Tribbles".

    2. Re:already have continuity errors by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, didn't I read though that they're not gonna try _too_ hard to resolve some of the conflicts between, what, 4 or 5 different shows (and how many movies).

      I don't blame them. Hell, Kirk's communicator is already bigger than some of the cellphones we have today. Face it, the original series was futuristic from the vantage of the '60s. Here it is decades later, why should the new show be totally constrained by the elements present in the original series?

    3. Re:already have continuity errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're telling the same stories, but from the vantage of different times. Ok, so they're talking about cowboys and indians in one series and spanish conquistadors in another. But the way the stories are presented reflects the people telling them.

      What I want is a new animated series -- with all the Larry Niven derived aliens.

    4. Re:already have continuity errors by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but what Kirk had is equivalent to a satellite phone, not a cellular phone.

    5. Re:already have continuity errors by pyros · · Score: 1

      early Klingons have been established to NOT have bumps. This was in TNG.

      Then Voyager screwed up big time. They had an episode where Torres was on the Barge of the Dead and the guy at the helm (the first Klingon, the one who killed the gods that made him) had a ridged head.

    6. Re:already have continuity errors by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      My favorite theory, propsed by someone on here, was that the klingons of that era were more into espionage than their latter-day counterparts - Therefore, altering their appearance would make it much easier to mingle with other humanoid races. Arne Darvin [Trouble w/ Tribbles [tos]] is a perfect example of this.

      In reality, Roddenberry supposively said that he had always intended klingons to have obvious appearances, but the makeup/fx budget of TOS was limited.

    7. Re:already have continuity errors by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

      I really need to know what this supposively word is. Is it even English?

    8. Re:already have continuity errors by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      So, should they try to portray the technology somewhere between an iridium phone and Kirk's communicator?

    9. Re:already have continuity errors by mr · · Score: 1

      In 'trouble with tribbles' Odo asks Worf that "If these were klingons, where are the ridges" and worf says something like It is an internal klingon matter, we don't discuss this with outsiders.
      Mentioned, yes. Resolved, well, no.
      Ridged Klingon's were in the movie version before TNG.

      --
      If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
    10. Re:already have continuity errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think that after 100+ years of technological improvement they'd be able to make satellite phones at least a little smaller than they are now.

    11. Re:already have continuity errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was DS9, it was a parody/flat-out-comedy episode, and NOT series canon by any stretch. Give it a rest, willya?..

  32. No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by rho · · Score: 2

    I'm seriously happy about one thing -- Enterprise won't have that god-awful writer's trick, the Holodeck. That damn thing ruined many a TNG and Voyager episode (it wasn't relied upon so heavily in DS9, thank goodness)

    Rayguns! Aliens! Rocketships! I love it!

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    1. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by phranking · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not used in DS9? You have now forced me to remind you of Vic Fontaine.

    2. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by IronChef · · Score: 2


      I don't have a problem with Vic as a character development tool for Odo. That was OK. But DS9 never did, that I recall, put the whole damn station in danger because of some rogue holodeck.

      Side note:

      Too bad Richard Dean Anderson couldn't do Stargate and another show at the same time. He'd be a great Trek captain. Hell, make him Captain O'Neil and just let him be his Stargate character.

    3. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by kisrael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, they had basically the same thing on the original series, they'd relied on the idea of "the theory of parallel development" to explain how Kirk and Co. could end up on the planet of the Nazis, the Romans (if the empire hadn't ended), the gangsters (no wait... the aliens 'read a book' on mobland), the indians (remember Kirk (Kur-ock? was it?) becoming part of the tribe... the holodeck was just some handwaving to make the same kind of storytelling possible without straining credulity quite so much. (Though obviously it had its own unbelievabilities built in)

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    4. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      The indians' ancestors had been scooped up by some aliens a long time ago and deposited on a nice little forest planet while the Nazis were due to the influence of a tinkering Federation historian.

      But yeah, "Bread and Circuses" and "Miri" were kinda pushing it.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    5. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by TWR · · Score: 2
      . But DS9 never did, that I recall, put the whole damn station in danger because of some rogue holodeck.


      There was one "James Bond" episode where different cast members were parts of the Holodeck program (good guys and bad guys), and if they died in the program, they'd be dead for real.


      But that was mostly played for laughs. Avery Brooks in the Neru jacket as the Bond villian was awesome ;-)


      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    6. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I'm seriously happy about one thing -- Enterprise won't have that god-awful writer's trick, the Holodeck

      Says who? It was in the original NCC 1701 blueprints, they just didn't have the budget to do it justice, and had enough variety in the writing that they didn't really need it.

      Now they've got the budget, and cowardly producers like Brannan and Braga (god help us all) who says they can't pull it back another generation?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    7. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it was only one episode. TNG seemed to average 2-3 a season.

    8. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by nurightshu · · Score: 1

      Now they've got the budget, and cowardly producers like Brannan and Braga (god help us all) who says they can't pull it back another generation?

      Not to be overly critical, but you're referring to one producer, Brannon Braga, as two people. I assume you mean Berman and Braga, and what makes them cowardly? IMNSHO, some of the Holodeck episodes were surprisingly well written (e.g., the Moriarty episodes in TNG, and the episode where the mob took over Vic Fontaine's lounge in DS9).

      What made the Holodeck and Holosuites valuable was their ability to give the writers a chance to place familiar characters into unfamiliar milieus, and to explore possibilities that never were (or never could be). Remember Cpt. Sisko's anger about the unreality of the Holodeck, especially as it dealt with race relations in the early 1960's Vegas? Plus, it's better than having them time-travelling all over the place, isn't it? That said, from everything I've heard, there will be no Holodeck on the new Enterprise. I'm happy with that, too, but mostly because I like the idea of a Trek series where everything isn't sanitary and pretty and works most of the time.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    9. Re:No More Holodeck Episodes! (w00t) by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • you're referring to one producer, Brannon Braga, as two people

      Ah, in that case I was being deliberately inconsistent, like Berman and Braga were with the number of photon torpedoes, number of crew, available technology, character traits, Prime Directive, yadda yadda yadda.

      what makes them cowardly?

      Filling the crew with anodyne politically correct shiny plastic stereotypes? Substituting the Particle of the Week for actual plot resolution? Going for the gonzo audience by introducing "Data in a D-cup"? Scattering the universe with Deus Ex Machines that always - always - burned out after one use? Right from the start, they steadfastly refused to avoid being challenging, and chose their "plots" from whatever knee jerk eco/social issue happened to be in the news at the time of "writing". Yes, TOS did that too at times, but when they did it, it was new and refreshing, plus they balanced it by pushing the envelope (first mainstream interracial kiss?).

      The Voyager finale stands as a testament to the whole misconceived mess. Particle of the Week and a Deux Ex Machine, give the poor old Borg a wedgie, a quick flurry of group hugs and salutes all round, and we're home, hurrah for us, medals all round. Sickeningly saccarine.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  33. Star Trek isn't sci-fi by wiredog · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's future-fantasy. Sci-fi is based on real, or at least plausible, science. It doesn't have a particle-of-the-week.

    That said, I'm looking forward to the show.

    1. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by geekoid · · Score: 2

      so name 3 sci-fi shows?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think there needs to be a Pedant-Fi designation, to satisfy all the "sci fi","science fiction","speculative fiction" whiners.


      If it's got something resembling science in it, and it's got fiction in it, people are going to call it "science fiction". I recommend living with that.

    3. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      it is sci-fi, pick up a book called the physics of star trek at you book store, its in the physics section.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by SLiK812 · · Score: 1

      Most of the stuff in Star Trek is based on theoretical physics. Anti-matter, bending space to go faster than light. It may never turn out to be true, but blame that on the dorkie haven't seen-light-in-decades research physicists that come up with the stuff. Don't blame the writers who play off of it.

    5. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Alien Nation. Robocop. War of the Worlds.

    6. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by am+2k · · Score: 1
      Sci-fi is based on real, or at least plausible, science.
      Then why did Harry Potter just win a sci-fi award?
    7. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • name 3 sci-fi shows [based on real, or at least plausible science]
      • Bionic Man
      • Bionic Woman
      • Space: Above and Beyond.
      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harry Potter just won a Hugo, which is a FAN VOTED award, so any story popular enough with the convention attendees can win regardless.

    9. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by jareds · · Score: 1

      Anti-matter exists beyond even a shadow of a doubt.

    10. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of definitions. According to at least one that I've read, "sci-fi" refers to "soft" science fiction, and "SF" refers to "hard" science fiction. Thus Star Trek falls under sci-fi, along with Godzilla, Babylon 5, E.T., and Stranger in a Strange Land. On the other hand, 2001, A.I., Robinson's Mars trilogy, and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress fall under SF.

      Most of us think we have an intuitive understanding of the differences between hard and soft science fiction, and between science fiction and fantasy. However, everyone seems to have a different intuitive understanding! Over the years, this has led to many silly arguments within the science fiction community, reaching for illusory "precise" definitions.

      Personally, I think of Star Trek as soft science fiction, since it occasionally makes an attempt to explore the technology and society of its future - a future that is extrapolated, however hamfistedly (the technobabble comes to mind :-), from our present. But that's just me.

    11. Re:Star Trek isn't sci-fi by mcrbids · · Score: 2

      Not too long ago, I remember a scientific theory advanced that the reason we keep finding sub-atomic particles is because we keep looking for them!

      Not in the "Duh, I find walnuts when I try to" but in the "They exist because we repeatedly create the situations that cause their existence" sort of way.

      IANAP (Physicist), but if that theory has any validity, why NOT have a "particle of the week"? I mean, you need a particle with certain properties - just MAKE one!

      -Ben

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  34. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by steevo.com · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Jeri Ryan could make a guest appearance to help this problem out.

  35. song by zephc · · Score: 3, Informative

    just in case anyone is interested, the song from all the promos is called "Wherever You Will Go" by 'The Calling'

    startrek.com has all the promos/teasers available (in qt though)

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:song by tb3 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I wish they'd keep it. It beats the hell out of Rod Stewart (See my earlier post).

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    2. Re:song by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

      God no. I hope that the song in that QT movie stays away from the series. If not, then just give the whole crew hairstyles from the latest gap commercial and throw them into a coffee shop to make politically correct observations on pop-culture.

    3. Re:song by keytoe · · Score: 1

      This is Informative?!

      Well, maybe if you want to know exactly what NOT to search for on gnutella. I caught the tail end of one of those promos last night on the TV - missed the first 26 seconds of it since I didn't bother to look at the screen due to bad music. Then they said 'Enterprise', I looked up - saw the logo. That's it.

      Man, you know some marketing weenie messed up when the choice of song actually deters people from watching the commercials...

  36. No "morality play" potential. by Rimbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first thing that jumps out at me from this description is that there's no potential for morality plays, which was the basis of the original series and the Next Generation (while Roddenberry lived).

    I'm not here to say that this is better or worse, or to whine about things not being the same since Roddenberry died, but rather to discuss what has changed. Whether or not this is a good thing varies depending on your taste.

    Star Trek was set up as a mechanism for telling stories, not a story in itself. The characters represented archetypes (or even the id, ego, and superego -- guess which one is which). The Enterprise itself and its mission were just metaphors, and the fantastic nature was intended to give people the freedom to explore a variety of subjects in metaphorical, exaggerated, or "what if" ways. Just like a lot of great sci-fi.

    This doesn't deny the new series' potential to be very entertaining and very good. But the new series is clearly different. In the new series, the situation is clearly defined. Aliens are just aliens, not symbols of ourselves in various guises. The new series presents an interesting point of view: Star Trek represented a utopian vision of our future; this series could be a vehicle to explore how we can achieve that particular utopia.

    Although that's pretty limited compared to the scope of the original series, where various utopian ideals could be compared and contrasted from show to show, it still could be very fascinating, because many of us would have different ideas for how such a utopia could be reach, and in this age of irony, most of us probably doubt we could achieve it at all.

    1. Re:No "morality play" potential. by jedwards · · Score: 1
      Good!
      I'm tired of every single show on TV having the same outline.
      • Characters get into situation
      • Main (usually) character has difficult moral choice
      • Character resolves moral conflict in mutually benificial way.
      • They all live happily every after (ie. until next week) and viewer has been taught the difference between right and wrong
      Life isn't like that, or to put it another way, shit happens. Not every situation has a moral, and not every situation can be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties.
    2. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I agree, some of the best parts of TOS and even to some extent TNG was the run-ins with the "Prime Directive". It would be interesting to see this series start out with out a prime directive, or at least one that was poorly thought out. Then, as a season finale/priemere run through a bad situation where a prime directive was needed after seeing the outcome of the actions of the federation. I think this would make for an exciting few episodes.

    3. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Rimbo · · Score: 2

      Uhm...that's not what a morality play is, dude.

      The main character in morality plays actually usually makes the wrong choice, it's not resolved in a beneficial way, and people don't live happily ever after, and THEN the viewer's been taught the difference between right and wrong. Think Greek theater.

      The original "Star Trek" series was really the only morality play on TV, with the possible exception of (I'm not kidding here) the "Fat Albert" cartoon and some of the "Sesame Street" skits. "Star Trek" was certainly the only one intended for adults.

    4. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Rimbo · · Score: 2

      Well, the "Prime Directive" was only useful in the ways that it was broken; sometimes it proved worthwhile to break it, sometimes it proved worthwhile not to break it, sometimes it was broken and it was a mistake, and sometimes it was not broken and it should have been.

      It depended on the author of the script (and the original series had some FABULOUS writing -- and some really BAD writing). The Prime Directive wasn't a philosophy of the series; it was just another device that the writers could use to put forth their own ideas, just like Kirk's Ego, Spock's Superego, and McCoy's Id.

    5. Re:No "morality play" potential. by steveha · · Score: 2

      Months ago, the first articles about the new series quoted Scott Bakula as saying: "It's Star Trek, but with explosions."

      They deliberately set up this series for more action, less angst. And I for one am cool with that.

      Of course, if you do it right, you can have both exciting action and a morality play. Consider the original Star Trek episode "Arena": Kirk and one Gorn are stuck on a planet and told to kill each other; the Gorn is way stronger and tougher than Kirk, but slower, so Kirk evades the Gorn and builds a weapon that can kill the Gorn; then, at the last moment, Kirk refuses to kill the Gorn and instead gives a morality speech. That episode really rocked.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    6. Re:No "morality play" potential. by 2Flower · · Score: 1
      Aliens are just aliens, not symbols of ourselves in various guises.

      Actually, the article implied that the Aliens From The Future(tm) actually could be (or is) an alternate future humanity that's pushing for a more aggressive Federation that won't get stepped on by the Klingons and Borg and Dominion and so on.

      I'm looking forward to that not just for the action/adventure yadda, but because seeing a NON-utopian alternate humanity that's trying to keep humanity from being the Trekkian utopia lends itself to some interesting moral plays. I can see a lot of great stories being played out over altering humanity's destiny and trying to push for one moral stance over the other.

    7. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to that not just for the action/adventure yadda, but because seeing a NON-utopian alternate humanity that's trying to keep humanity from being the Trekkian utopia lends itself to some interesting moral plays. I can see a lot of great stories being played out over altering humanity's destiny and trying to push for one moral stance over the other.

      Oh, certainly. In the end, "It's The Writing, Stupid!" The vehicle only matters in that it allows the good writers to do good work. Having one alternative humanity is okay, but infinite multiple alternative humanities -- a la "Sliders" (a show that took advantage of its premise less often than "Star Trek") -- has possibilities.

      Think about it. If one alternative future can come back and mess around with the past...what's to keep any number of alternative futures from trying the same? :)

    8. Re:No "morality play" potential. by fataugie · · Score: 1

      quoted Scott Bakula as saying: "It's Star Trek, but with explosions."



      So what you're telling me is, that Face, is going to go galavanting around the Universe, saving good "people" from bad "people" with lots of explosions? Hmmm.....next you're going to tell me the Enterprise is shaped like a Dodge van with mag wheels, and they are going to have a black man with lots of jewelry and a bad attitude.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    9. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Picard"..."Peppard"...

      The similarities are too close to ignore!

    10. Re:No "morality play" potential. by hagar · · Score: 1

      "Face" was played by Dirk Benedict, not Scott Bakula.

    11. Re:No "morality play" potential. by fataugie · · Score: 1

      OOps,

      Well, they look alike.....what can I say

      --

      WTF? Over?

    12. Re:No "morality play" potential. by powerlord · · Score: 2

      Actually, the article implied that the Aliens From The Future(tm) actually could be (or is) an alternate future humanity that's pushing for a more aggressive Federation that won't get stepped on by the Klingons and Borg and Dominion and so on.


      Hmmm that was my take on it.
      Possibly extended to the "Damn! Unless we change enough key events, the future we came from won't exist to go home to!"

      It could (theoretically), also be used as a way to "modify" existing Trek continuity (is Trek-Continuity an oxymoron?), slightly in order to create a different (or subtly altered) "present" for the next series (or perhaps movie?) to take place in.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    13. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Ricardo+Lima · · Score: 1

      Funny, I think that if someone is the id, this one is Kirk.

      Ego: Spock
      Id: Kirk
      Super-Ego: McCoy

      --
      Ricardo da Silva Lima
    14. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Funny, I think that if someone is the id, this one is Kirk.

      Good point...I just re-read something here on the id, superego and ego. I had a degenerate definition of the three in my mind, where Id represented emotion, Superego represented logic, and Ego represented the self, but clearly that's not the case.

      But in non-Freudian terms, that breakdown makes sense; McCoy is the right half of the brain (creativity and emotion), Spock is the left half (logic, reason), and Kirk is the one who has to listen to both sides of the brain argue back and forth and figure out what the hell he's going to do.

    15. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. T, Mr. Worf. Same deal.

      Make it so.

    16. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Rand+Race · · Score: 2
      Star Trek represented a utopian vision of our future.


      Uh huh, an utopian future where there have been no new works of art/literature/music since the 20th century. An utopia where ships have tele/empathic thought police masquerading as "ship's counselers". An utopia where homosexuality, in fact any deviation from the norm, is viewed as suspect. An utopia which claims to respect all ideologies yet reacts with instant and total hate for the Ferengi (and I won't even get into the anti-semitic overtones of that particular Trek ideal). Their utopia is a sterile place indeed.


      They could make a damn good dark Trek series exploring the price the Federation payed for their "utopia". I don't think TOS suffers from this nearly to the degree TNG/DS9/STV do, so something had to have happened inbetween the 6th movie and TNG.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    17. Re:No "morality play" potential. by hawk · · Score: 2
      > Oh, certainly. In the end, "It's The Writing, Stupid!" The vehicle
      > only matters in that it allows the good writers to do good work.


      and this is the crux of it, more than anything else.


      Star Trek (and I refuse to toss silly three letter things around for it, other than, perhaps, TRO) was a series of free standing stories, generally well done. We weren't supposed to be concerned about the "development" of the characters, and it didn't waste time on those inane poker games. Kirk, Spock, and McCoy were not ongoing characters, but faces of humanity. [and, damnit, that stupid robot was no replacement for spock's role! (but then, Kirk & McCoy were missing, too . . .)]


      The concern with continuity was one of the worst things that they did with the spinoffs (hey, it's a tough list to choose from), which were generally a mix of plot crutches and time loops, with the viewer supposed to (for some inane reason) care about the technical details of proactively levering the synnergies of the quantum flux giga bubble, rahter than the simpple "Scotty somehow fixed it in time!")


      sigh. I really shouldn't get my hopes up again . . .


      hawk

    18. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      To quote the original article:
      Our source in Paramount told us that the time traveling baddies backing the Sulibans are fascist Terrans from the alternative mirror universe, trying to alter history so that the Earth follows a more aggressive path which will leave it in control of the galaxy in the mirror universe, rather than at the mercy of The Dominion, Cardassians, Borg, Klingons, Romulans etc.
      So their main goal is to change the federation in "our"/the ST universe to be different (like theirs, to be precise) to the one that made Kirk the man who "fucked up" their Spock, which lead to the downfall of the alternative Federation.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    19. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "An utopia which claims to respect all ideologies yet reacts with instant and total hate for the Ferengi (and I won't even get into the anti-semitic overtones of that particular Trek ideal)."

      What and odd statement to make. I thought the Ferengi represented capitalism, against Star Trek's more socialist ideals. If you believe all jews are bankers and capitalists, that's your problem, not Star Trek's.

    20. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Rimbo · · Score: 2

      The concern with continuity was one of the worst things that they did with the spinoffs (hey, it's a tough list to choose from), which were generally a mix of plot crutches and time loops, with the viewer supposed to (for some inane reason) care about the technical details of proactively levering the synnergies of the quantum flux giga bubble, rahter than the simpple "Scotty somehow fixed it in time!")

      Well, continuity was actually a big plus in Babylon 5, and I think the continuity bug caught on in Star Trek in no small part due to that. But it wasn't the continuity itself that worked or didn't work; it was the overall high quality of most of the Bab5 writing, versus the overall low quality of the post-Roddenberry Star Trek series' writing.

    21. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the things I liked about B5 was that when something had happened to a character, it had after effects suitable to whatever happened, and was sometimes fatal - and if so, they NEVER came back, not no way, not no how.

      Most of the characters had Very Bad experiences, and several died. No "all happy ever after" there!

    22. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, continuity was actually a big plus in Babylon 5, and I think the continuity bug caught on in Star Trek in no small part due to that."

      ...that and the fact that DS9 started life based on the B5 storyline, so it inheirited a solid story arc from the word Go. One of the better things to have happened to it.

    23. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " "An utopia which claims to respect all ideologies yet reacts with instant and total hate for the Ferengi (and I won't even get into the anti-semitic overtones of that particular Trek ideal)."

      "What and odd statement to make. I thought the Ferengi represented capitalism, against Star Trek's more socialist ideals. If you believe all jews are bankers and capitalists, that's your problem, not Star Trek's."

      You're right. Ferengi were Adam Smith's philosophical children, no other slurs intended.

    24. Re:No "morality play" potential. by laeraun2 · · Score: 1

      Thats wrong, Sheridan came back from the dead.

      --
      Error: Erection reset by beer.
    25. Re:No "morality play" potential. by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      Take a look at anti-semitic propaganda from the early part of this past century. Jews are represented as small with big heads (and noses of course) and as being astonishingly dumb for a group that "controlled the finances of the world". Sounds like a Ferengi to me. I'm not saying that they did it purposefully, in fact I highly doubt they did, but the parallels are disturbing in their implications of the writer's ignorance if nothing else.


      If you and Trek are ignorant of the portrayal of jews in anti-semitic screeds, that's your and Trek's problem, not mine.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    26. Re:No "morality play" potential. by seann · · Score: 0

      And the last episode where he finally died, 20 years in the future, was so sad.

      He may of came back from the dead, but he had that time limit.. It added alot to the story

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    27. Re:No "morality play" potential. by hawk · · Score: 2

      That factors in as well, yes. If you'd just strike the "character development" nonsense from the spinoffs,
      a) they'd be about half as long
      b) they'd be much better.
      I'm not arguing that ongoing story arcs and character development are bad in themselves; you can certainly have a wonderful progarm with them. But that's an entirely different kind of story telling than what made Star Trek successful and interesting.


      hawk

    28. Re:No "morality play" potential. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      "Face" was played by Dirk Benedict, not Scott Bakula.
      ...and the van was a GMC, not a Dodge.
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  37. Que! by Jordy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bring back Que! Que was in my opinion the most entertaining character ever to grace ST. Ok, maybe I just like the idea of a morally blank omnipotent person who moves people around like chess peices to see how the other side responds.

    Everyone else was so emotionally blank and serious that having someone inject a little fun into their otherwise by-the-book lives was interesting.

    Of course, from what I understand, Enterprise is supposed to be before there was a book to go by, which might make things a bit more entertaining.

    Maybe they should just bring back the really, really short skirts, move it to Showtime beside SG-1 and do something more... interesting once in a while. Actually, compared to the original ST, TNG was a bit bland in that regard, but compared to TNG, the last generations of ST were seriously devoid of any serious long-term sexual tension.

    Of course, that's just my opinion; I could be wrong.

    --
    The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    1. Re:Que! by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

      Bring back Que!


      Just a small note: it's 'Q', not 'Que'. But I gotta agree, Q was a cool ass character. Most of my favorite TNG episodes involved Q.


      I also somewhat agree with you comments about the 'sexual tension'.

      --

      Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    2. Re:Que! by zephc · · Score: 2

      its 'Queue' not 'Que'

      #pragma sarcasm_off

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:Que! by zephc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      also, here's one of my favorite Q quotes

      "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid."
      -Q, Star Trek:TNG episode 'Q Who'

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:Que! by AnonymousBlowhard · · Score: 1

      sure, and seeing as how Q is an omnipotent being, he's the only one who can make references to things that haven't happened yet, like hanging out with picard and janeway. You can bet he'll show up in this series.

      --

      --
      A man's home is his castle. And the remote is his sword.
    5. Re:Que! by Bastard+Operator+Fro · · Score: 1

      I always thought is was Queueue....

      --
      Shaun Nelson - Bastard Operator (From Hell / For Hire)
    6. Re:Que! by fragbait · · Score: 1
      ...a morally blank omnipotent person who moves people around like chess peices to see how the other side responds..

      So...take out the "morally blank omnipotent" part, and Que becomes nothing more than equivalent of a chat room/message board/newsgroup Troll.


      fragbait
    7. Re:Que! by ktakki · · Score: 2
      Ok, maybe I just like the idea of a morally blank omnipotent person who moves people around like chess peices to see how the other side responds.


      Last season, John Delancie (the actor who plays Q) appeared on The West Wing as a lobbyist and on The Practice as a lawyer.

      Do you think he might be getting typecast here? What's next, the Jack Valenti biopic?

      k.

      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    8. Re:Que! by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      I always liked: "Ah, Worf! Eaten any good books lately?"

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    9. Re:Que! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ok, maybe I just like the idea of a morally blank omnipotent person who moves people around like chess peices to see how the other side responds."

      A great expression of the idea that the MOST dangerous thing in all the Universe is...a bored superbeing.

  38. Star Trek Voyager by Captain+Pooh · · Score: 1

    Star Trek Voyager was the best Star Trek ever, well the original was cool also, but Voyager is the best. Picard is a poser compared to Janeway, and how many starships had a borg turned human working onboard?

    1. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      how many starships had a borg turned human working onboard?

      you forgot to add "with really big hooters"

    2. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many starships had a borg turned human working onboard?

      Uh, the Enterprise?

    3. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Captain+Pooh · · Score: 1

      The Enterprise had a borg turned human working onboard?

    4. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    5. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...how many starships had a borg turned human working onboard?

      None. Starships don't exist. The Borg are fictional characters. Deal.

    6. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his name is picard or locutus of borg.

    7. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Accipiter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ever heard of The Best of Both Worlds?

      The Enterprise did have a borg-turned-human on board. His name is Jean-Luc Picard.

      (TNG did it first, and TNG did it best. Jeri Ryan was simply added to Voyager for the horny-teen demographic.)

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    8. Re:Star Trek Voyager by snilloc · · Score: 1
      What sort of parallel universe do YOU come from?!

    9. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voyager suffered from a lack of any likeable characters. Janeway was an egotistical barking dog who lacked discipline, Chakotay was little more than a primate with the mental capacity of a 10-year old, Tuvok was always stating the blindingly obvious in an attempt to sound "logical", the doctor was a complete asshole and coward (they unsuccessfully tried to rip-off Rimmer's persona from Red Dwarf), Neelix == Jar-Jar Binks, Torres was a little bitch all of the time, Paris was absolutely forgettable, Kim was a two-bit player and Seven had no purpose than to draw in teenage male audiences.

    10. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many starships had a sentient android who banged Tasha Yar working onboard?

    11. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget those borg standard issue 6" high heels! She could assimilate me ANYTIME!

    12. Re:Star Trek Voyager by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      Into the troll's snare....

      1. Voyager had dialogue copied from the pages of "1001 Trite Cliché's"

      2. The USS Voyager went parts shopping at the local Borg-e-mart. Just one cube can destroy the whole Federation and countless other civilizations, but **Voyager** can take'em on when need be.

      3. Can you count Photon Torpedoes?

      4. How many cool technologies were discovered, installed, then gone the next episode?

      5. The ending and everything about it sucked goatse.

      6. No morals, lessons, or deep thinking. Just, "Let's take our initial emotional response (and sometimes our reaction to that initial response), wait for a while with a long face, then call it Philosophy." The arguments and discussion on Voyager were filler, not real substantial thoughts.

      7. Match the frequency. Reverse the polarity. Use an X particle beam. Need I say more?

    13. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Pathos78 · · Score: 1

      (TNG did it first, and TNG did it best. Jeri Ryan was simply added to Voyager for the horny-teen demographic.)

      That, and they needed one person on board who can act (other than the doc). She's actully a decent actress, but I guess it can be hard to see past those stupid, stupid costumes they give the attractive women (Troi didn't wear a uniform till, what, the last season?).

    14. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. Match the frequency. Reverse the polarity. Use an X particle beam. Need I say more?

      You just summed up 95% of Voyager's episodes.

    15. Re:Star Trek Voyager by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I assume this is your short list! Voyager, by far, was the crappiest ST EVER. Nothing made sense. The Captain made choices that any sane 14y.o. would know would be dumb. The command structure made no sense and was rarely enforced in such a manner that would maintain it self. The plots were horrid and transparent and usually obvious how the three part episode would end within the first ten minutes of the first episode....blah...blah...blah...this added with yours, is my VERY SHORT LIST....

      oh ya, gotta love this one...exactly what was the whole point of the warp engines moving? I can think of a millions reasons for them not to, can't think of a single reason why they did...as far as I know, it was never explained...

      I'm hoping I won't have to reverse the polarity of my stomach with the new show, which is exactly what I had to do when it came to Voyager. Ack! Puke! Ack! The pain...make it stop... :)

    16. Re:Star Trek Voyager by MeltyMan · · Score: 1

      Oh, Burn! :)

      --
      "Ummmm..." ...The programmer's "Om."
    17. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8. We turn two major characters in to salamanders and have them mate! And then remember and talk about it!!

    18. Re:Star Trek Voyager by ChiefCrazyTalk · · Score: 0

      ha ha ha. Good troll.

    19. Re:Star Trek Voyager by GlassUser · · Score: 1
      (TNG did it first, and TNG did it best. Jeri Ryan was simply added to Voyager for the horny-teen demographic.)


      And DAMN DID IT WORK

    20. Re:Star Trek Voyager by Captain+Pooh · · Score: 1

      Star Trek Voyager is still the best. Janeway rules

  39. Trekkie, it is time for a boner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It pleases me that Trekkie will again have a boner. Perhaps he will propagate.

  40. Damn discrimination by Chakat · · Score: 1
    It's not clear if this bunch are from the main mirror universe or a side-line mirror universe, as some of the suggestions from our man at Paramount seem to be that the time travellers are descendants of Khan-like warlords ... heavily enhanced by genetic engineering. This is the future they want for humanity ... turning everyone into Bashir-like geniuses (even if the poor old normals don't want super-powers).

    Why is it that everyone who wants to genetically enhance some people is automatically classified as being a monomaniacal fascist who wants to take over the country/world/universe/whatever? Hey, I'm for revising the human race's source code, but not for upgrading by humanity by force. Why can't we have one scifi show or movie that shows modified people in a good light.

    Though I would think it would be interesting to androgynize the human race. Probably solve a lot of problems, too...

    --

    If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    1. Re:Damn discrimination by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      Why is it that everyone who wants to genetically enhance some people is automatically classified as being a monomaniacal fascist who wants to take over the country/world/universe/whatever? Hey, I'm for revising the human race's source code, but not for upgrading by humanity by force. Why can't we have one scifi show or movie that shows modified people in a good light.

      Julian Bashir, DS9

    2. Re:Damn discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight! (not about the androgenization bit though - I like *my* naughty bits the way they are)

      I'm a biologist and I've always thought it amusing how genetic-engineering (or whatever it was before there WAS genetic engineering - splicing, mutating, etc) - the scientist was either presented as

      A.) Insane nut who is evil/bitter/constipated and wants to rule/destroy humantiy

      or

      B.) The good-intentioned but naieve/blinded/short-sighted scientist who wants to do good things but didn't realize the "DISASTEROUS" consequences, and who sees the light in the end.

      I think that these cliched scenarios ignore the fundamental "what-if" appeal of good sci-fi - what if extreme genetic modification were available and there were NO "evil" consequences?

      In the end I think it's a case of "You are completely free to talk about or support ANY subject... oh! but NOT subjects X, Y, Z." It's kind of a taboo thing, and we can discuss it, only if everyone agrees about how BAD it is - an opinion that is somewhat close-minded and unimaginative, IMHO.

      Hell, I wouldn't mind the simple genetic engineering to give me better hair, and perhaps a tail too! We need a "Support your local mad scientist" society :)

      Sincerely,
      Kevin Christie
      crispiewm@hotmail.com

    3. Re:Damn discrimination by snilloc · · Score: 1

      Why can't we have one scifi show or movie that shows modified people in a good light. On DS9, the doctor was revealed to be genetically enhanced, though it was done illegally.

    4. Re:Damn discrimination by Chakat · · Score: 1
      Forgot about that episode, great ethical dilema we may have to deal with in the future. What exactly do we do with modified beings if there are laws against such manipulation passed? Do we punish them with death just because their parents decide to modify their genes? Do we exile them to some future variety of a leper colony, forcing them to live out the rest of their days as an exile? IIRC, in that episode of the show, Bashir was to be kicked out of Star Fleet, although it was decided that he could stay, but who's to say that when we truly get to that point we'd be so lenient.

      Though I'm fairly sure that if they did allow GEed humans, they'd ban all of the "fun" stuff - no tails, no fur, no androgyny, no fun at all.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    5. Re:Damn discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Though I would think it would be interesting to androgynize the human race. Probably solve a lot of problems, too...

      And create new problems, too. Do you really want to live in a world populated with nothing but David Bowie and Annie Lennox lookalikes? I like my men masculine and my women feminine, thank you very much. There's plenty of room to tolerate the in-betweens without giving in to total androgeny.

  41. Colors :-) by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like this part:

    "There's also color in the graphics on the screens, so it's never going to be a dull picture."

    Whoa, all the colors of the 'bow, man! :-)

  42. Contrived plot (Yeah, he was a troll, but...) by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems to me that this plot is too contrived to be taken seriously. "evil mirror-villains from the future"??


    Gee, isn't a much richer plotline and a sense of deeper continuity a good part of what people said made Bab5 such a great show? Seems like P'mont is "getting it" this time, and trying the same tricks. Sounds like a perfectly good idea to me!


    The other shows all had simple, realistic premises-the Enterprise is exploring the universe, Voyager is trying to get back home, the Enterprise is exploring the universe with a much crappier crew.


    Well, for ST:TNG if you take the first episode and the last episode they used to try and tie up the entire series with, then the plot becomes a bit larger than just exploring the universe. It's humanity's trial by fire by a much greater power that sees potental within us. Q tells Picard at the begining we are on trial. At the end, Q give Picard both the power to destroy ourselves as a species, and gives him the power to expand his abilities beyond the human norm, to experience the universe ever so slightly like the Q does. Picard managed wrap his mind around the situation finally (but never completely understands it) and humanity (with Picard as it's representative) makes it past it's trial by fire.


    Too bad they never followed up on it at all in the movies or other series. They really could have had fun with humanity beinging to awaken it's self, instead of relying on technology solely.


    (In TNG's final episode, if you want to try and search to find deeper meaning, you can. But ya gotta try really hard - pretty much streaching it and giving the writers more credit than is really due. I'm definitely not going to give that synopsis here on Slashdot to have it picked through ;-)


    Anyway, the point of this is that clearly the plot is degenerating as new shows are produced. This obviously means that each successive "Star Trek" show is worse than the last. This means that Kirk is much, much better than Picard. QED.


    Troll. Really.


    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    1. Re:Contrived plot (Yeah, he was a troll, but...) by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Gee, isn't a much richer plotline and a sense of deeper continuity a good part of what people said made Bab5 such a great show?

      A great show that tanked, and which is hard to pick up half way through in re-runs. Enterprise won't be allowed to do that, so they'll drop any idea of continuity and just cram in plenty of green Orion slave girl tits and ass as soon as the ratings flutter.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Contrived plot (Yeah, he was a troll, but...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "green Orion slave girl tits and ass as soon as the ratings flutter."

      Fine by me, don't forget the blue Sirian slave girl tits and ass, either!

    3. Re:Contrived plot (Yeah, he was a troll, but...) by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      >A great show that tanked

      I'm sorry, are you talking about Babylon 5? Tanked? I can't claim to be an expert on the subject, but IIRC B5 was originally designed as a 5 season series, and it lasted for 5 seasons. I think it stands on a different level than ANY of the star trek shows (although the original was on before I really watched sci fi). It was complex, admittedly, but brilliant. It had me on the edge of my seat so many times... It was certainly CLOSER to realistic sci fi than any ST show (life signs? WTF?). It had the effect of a very long, well made miniseries, not just years of discreet episodes.

      Don't get me wrong, I've probably seen every ep of all the ST shows now. I enjoy trashy sci-fi, and star trek is the very best of it, but B5 was brilliant, just not made for the masses (which, perhaps, is a somewhat redundant statement; no one gets rich by making brilliant works, from what I've seen).

      In short, B5 did what it said, and said what it did. Tanked, it didn't. =)

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    4. Re:Contrived plot (Yeah, he was a troll, but...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can't claim to be an expert on the subject, but IIRC B5 was originally designed as a 5 season series, and it lasted for 5 seasons."

      You're exactly right. B5 would *not* have had a 6th season regardless of success in ratings. Spinoffs, yes, but the ongoing story of that station was *finished*.

      And, they had only one use of time travel in that five years, with strict limits, never to be repeated.

    5. Re:Contrived plot (Yeah, he was a troll, but...) by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I'm sorry, are you talking about Babylon 5? Tanked?

      Tanked. We loved it, the networks hated it, as did Joe Sixpack. The ratings were lousy, and it only scraped into season 5 by the skin of its teeth, by making a pile of compromises, and by introducing tits and ass (aka an over facelifted, under nourished clothes horse captain).

      And, much as I enjoyed it, it is hard to pick up from a random episode. DS9 suffered a little from that, but contrast with Voyager, where every character is a pencil sketch of a stereotype, and you don't have to know any background or context, because the writer's don't know it either.

      So I'm glad that B5 made it to the end, but I think that it served as a warning to other shows it doesn't pay (literally) to allow the creative people too much leeway. Big bangs, big tits, don't offend or challenge anyone, and keep it simple. Looking at the trailers and the plastic cast of Enterprise, I think they've taken that to heart.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  43. Star Trek Programming by Bob+McCown · · Score: 0, Troll

    do
    {
    if( current_time >= start_time + 45 )
    {
    solution = PARTICLE_OF_THE_WEEK;
    FinishUp();
    }
    sleep(60_SECONDS);
    } while (viewers_still_watching_this_drek);

    1. Re:Star Trek Programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      COC pls, thx.

  44. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by zonker · · Score: 0

    that's silicone... not silicon... =)

  45. Not all shapeshifters are "bad guys" by d_lesage · · Score: 1
    Of course, all 'shapeshifters' are instantly tagged as bad guys ... ever since the 1950s and those movies with pods, and thus it is in Enterprise.
    Well, not all of them. Remember that character in Space:1999? Maya, I think she was called.
    --

    Ich werde nie wieder denken
    1. Re:Not all shapeshifters are "bad guys" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right.

      She was called Maya (or Maïa ?), and was a 'shapeshifter'. The character only appeared in the second (and last) season of space 1999, which is IMHO the worst one.

      The difference was she was some kind of humanoid, able to change its genetical structure, not a water-like specie (like Odo) without "original" form. As far as I remember, her planet was called "Psychon" and was destroyed unintentionally by cdr. Koenig, wos was trapped by maya's father. They brought her to Alpha, so she became a member of the crew, having a love affair with the italian guy wos was always trying to make beer... just can't remember his name... Tony Verdecci ?

      If anybody is interested, I'm writing a novel in which I'll make the sons and daughters of the space 1999 crew meet the DS9 Team on bard the Defiant. Might be interesting. I'm planning a quite fun "challenge" between Odo and Maya's daughter about changing shape.

      If you wanna help, write to : olivier.bordereau@wanadoo.fr

  46. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by IronChef · · Score: 2


    The Tholians were mentioned a couple of times on DS9. I forget the exact words, but it was apparent that there was some kind of relationship with them now and they weren't outright hostile.

    Pity.

    Never heard anything about the Gorn though. Would be nice to run into them again. Let's see if la-di-dah pooftah Capt. Archer can make an improvised cannon like Kirk did!

  47. I can't by wiredog · · Score: 2
    Well, we're talking hard sf here. Generally, FTL travel is fantasy. But..
    It's hard to name sci-fi books. Most of Larry Niven's Known Space books (pre-hyperdrive). 2001 (and the movie). Fountains of Paradise. Mote in Gods Eye (passes the plausibility test, great first contact novel)

    I like much of what's marketed as sf, Anne McCaffrey is my "guilty pleasure". Her early work was definitely fantasy, later moves towards sf.

    My favorites are Niven, Niven/Pournelle, Piper, Clarke, Asimov, and Heinlein. Stephenson is the only modern author I've been able to read.

    1. Re:I can't by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      Across Realtime, A Fire Upon the Deep, and A Deepness in the Sky, by Vernor Vinge.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:I can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fiction (fik'shen)
      n.

      A lie.

      A literary work whose content is produced by the imagination and is not necessarily based on fact.


      Star Trek is indeed science fiction.

    3. Re:I can't by crypt01inguist · · Score: 1

      How about: Allan Steele, David Weber, Stephen Gould?

      --
      120 characters?! Who do they think they are, telling me I only get 120 characters? This will never do. I must have mor
  48. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by Slak · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You mean Britney Spears isn't going to make a guest appearance?

  49. No, dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like saying a BSOD is a 'successful response' and that Windows 'works fine'. The code is fucked up, that's why you continually get those error messages.

    1. Re:No, dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The code worked fine. You requested a page and it came down no problem. HTTP 200 means it WORKED.

      Why don't you take a remedial english class and fucking learn how to read?

  50. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tholians? They wound up being blue-skinned bald-headed humanoids (see TNG, DS9). No big strangeness there.

  51. methods of death by Pope · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, I can see by the method of death that you're also looking forward to the new Buffy season? :)

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  52. Can you say no Prime Directive? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Not that Kirk paid it much attention...

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  53. Bumpy Klingons by TBone · · Score: 2

    My understanding of the episode where Worf saw the ST:TOS Klingons was that, for some reason, the Klingons back then altered themselves to appear less inhuman than they were.

    --

    This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

    1. Re:Bumpy Klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the novels, the human like Klingons were taken as slaves from the Klingons' conquests. Those that looked like Worf were the Imperial race of Klingons that did not strut around in space lest they be killed.

    2. Re:Bumpy Klingons by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      Except that Captain Koloth appears as both. He's human-looking in The Trouble With Tribbles and got the forehead from hell in DS9 Blood Oath. Really, they should have just put the difference down to the low make-up budget in the 60's and never paid it any attention (even in Trials and Tribble-ations).

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    3. Re:Bumpy Klingons by buzzbomb · · Score: 1

      It was DS9, actually. "Trials and Tribble-ations."

      Odo: "THOSE are Klingons??"
      Someone: "Worf, what happened?"
      Worf: "We do not discuss it with outsiders."

      Actually, it was one of the only good DS9 episodes. Me? I prefer TNG and Voyager. And I'm not that much of a geek...I got the episode via DiVX a week ago.

  54. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    No no no! If they were following the TOS, they'd have silicone-based life forms -- Ensigns with mini-skirts, and riding boots. (Don't ask me why they'd have riding boots without holodecks.)

    YEAH! No holodecks! (Of course, we never did see the TOS bowling alley. Maybe they'll have one.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  55. Anyone else have problems with the videos? by Uttles · · Score: 1

    I went to the ST site and could not get a single video to play... I kept getting the "page cannot be found" message. Did anyone else have this problem?

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Anyone else have problems with the videos? by TresTresMondoMod · · Score: 0

      That's not a problem, that's a blessing.

  56. What's pathetic... by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    What's pathetic is that there was MORE character development and story development (even unto having a story arc over the whole season) on Buffy than on Voyager.

    Just think: if five years ago I'd told you that a show based on the movie Buffy the Vampire Slayer would have better writing than a show based on Star Trek....

  57. Star trek found dead at age 27 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bloated corpse of Gene Roddenberry's crack-pipe dream, "Star Trek" was found dead on a back lot of Univeral's Paramount studios. Although it was only intended to be mindless swashbuckling adventure, the series was adopted by geeks and other social misfits. You may have never watched the show since it started to suck, but still it was an American icon -- sorta like "fat Elvis".

  58. Q and the Dowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose one could call Qs' appearances just avatars, we never saw what they *really* looked like, just what they thought we could understand..

    The Q pretty much preferred the human (Terran) form to show themselves.... even the first time one appeared in TOS -- Remember Trelane? (the spoiled brat who thought he was Napoleon?) he was the first character development attempt at portraying a Q, even though they didn't call the species Q at that time. Another interesting shapeshifting, omnipotent being was the Dowd. Remeber him? The guy who killed off an entire species and then sentenced himself to solitary exile on a remote planet as punishment for his crime.

  59. Begining too quick by steveo777 · · Score: 1
    I know they're trying to keep the whole Trek universe consistant, but this really is rediculous. They are already causing a civil war among the Klingons! It's an outrage. We should be getting introduced to the charecters.

    So far, I've trusted all the pilots, and they've delivered excellently. Well, maybe not so much Voyager, but they all have blown me away. Who could forget meeting Q? He was the most intigral part of TNG. They started it with him, and ended it as well. So, unless they want to start and end this whole series with the Klingon cival war... this is a mistake.

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    1. Re:Begining too quick by Accipiter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree.

      In my opinion (which is a synonym for FACT), Star Trek: The Next Generation is the very best Star Trek series ever produced. The fact that Q was able to bring the series full-circle, entwining the pilot with the finale was genius.

      Voyager started out "okay", but got really weak late in the second season. I never really got into Deep Space Nine, but it wasn't horrible. (Past season 3, Voyager pretty much blew. The finale was a total rehash of TNG's finale as well, which (In my opinion) cheapened and insulted the TNG finale.)

      I am not optimistic about Enterprise for many reasons. If it's supposed to take place ~100 years before Kirk, why does Archer's ship look so much more advanced than the original 1701? And I can't believe they're "reportedly" starting off the series with a Mirror Universe story.

      First of all, this Enterprise ship doesn't fit inside the Canon timelines *anywhere*. Secondly, the original series explored the Mirror Universe once. DS9 did it an assload of times. Now the new show is going to feature it in the PILOT?

      Things do not look good. I say it's time to either give Star Trek a 10+ year sabbatical, or let the franchise die an honorable death as soon as possible.

      Worf wouldn't have it any other way.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    2. Re:Begining too quick by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      DS9 Was okay in the last season. I never liked the religous overtones in it - I mean, it was present like EVERY EPISODE!?.. It was one of the basis' of the entire plotline. It was old. The last season really was awesome in some places, especially the Seige of AR-558 & Field of Fire [ Though i have issues with that episode ].

    3. Re:Begining too quick by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      In my opinion (which is a synonym for FACT), Star Trek: The Next Generation is the very best Star Trek series ever produced.

      What about Wesley? How can the TNG be the best series when you take his annoying, wussy character into account?

      It used to annoy me to no end. A typical Wesley story involves Wesley causing some crisis, Wesley doing something to avert the crisis that he caused, and the Captain and crew thanking Wesley for his efforts. Geez...

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    4. Re:Begining too quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to fault a successful, seven year series because of one character that you personally don't like, you need to re-evaluate your judgement.

      In fact, Wesley:

      A) Wasn't THAT bad
      and
      B) Was featured in only a handful of episodes at most.

    5. Re:Begining too quick by hound3000 · · Score: 1
      I'm confused here, first you say:
      let the franchise die an honorable death as soon as possible.

      Then, as we all know, you state that:
      Voyager started out "okay", but got really weak late in the second season.

      There is no honorable death for the franchise right now. Voyager killed that possibility. The best thing they could have done was keep the series to one show at a time, and make damn sure that the writers on that one series were 1st class. If you kill the franchise off now, it's dead completely. You almost have to give it Star Trek 10 and one more series to half way rescue it from the complete mishandling Voyager gave it.

      Even you discount some bad plots here and there, always using the "particle-of-the-week", or Seven's Borg NanoSaviors cuts the rest of anything out of it. Can't we have complicated plots that involve real thinking and skill instead of technobabble to get out of? Almost every episode of Babylon 5 used critical thinking skills in order to get out of sticky situations. And I loved that series for it.

  60. Read this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

    So I guess constant internal errors or misconfigurations mean "The code worked fine"?

    What a fucking moron. How do you manage to tie your shoes in the morning? Or do you just tuck the laces in the side?

    1. Re:Read this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE NOT LISTENING TO ME JACKASS!

      Your browser requested the page, and it came down fine! Your browser rendered it so you could read that statement you posted above!

      Get it through your thick fucking skull!

  61. Funny thing that by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2


    Well, somebody agrees with you- sortof.


    I go to my local public library where I find books about dragons, wizards, and sword swinging heros in the "Science Fiction" category.


    I find all the books about space ships, phasers, dyson spheres, time travel, etc in the "Fantasy section".


    Somehow, somewhere, something went really wrong with these classifications.

  62. Tired of pinko liberal Trek! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 3, Funny

    These human supremacists don't want the soft liberal peace and love Federation of Kirk and the Next Generation's universe coming into fruition, and are planning to push it down a route which will leave the Earth absolute master of a million worlds.

    I'm tired of all this pinko-liberal, bleeding-heart, self-abasing BS! What's wrong with being a human? It's like they're taking this whole myth that white, hetro males are responsible for all the evils in the world and are extending it into a multi-species universe where humans can only "redeem" themselves by engaging in some twisted form of self-abasement! So humans want to be in charge?? So what! Bring it on! I wish this parallel universe really did exist and I could get to it because I'm real sick of the snivelling, bleeding-heart pathetic excuses for humans we have in this one!

    Signed, a disgusted, white, hetro, male!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:Tired of pinko liberal Trek! by pezpunk · · Score: 1

      hey nice gun rack.

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    2. Re:Tired of pinko liberal Trek! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      hey nice gun rack.

      Thank-you! It goes nicely with the Confederate flag and the "better dead than red" bumber sticker, don't you think?

      Note: This post was made by my evil twin fron the alternate universe and should not be taken as a representation of my true opinions.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    3. Re:Tired of pinko liberal Trek! by Pathos78 · · Score: 1

      a multi-species universe where humans can only "redeem" themselves by engaging in some twisted form of self-abasement!

      Right on brother! And you just _know_ how they're going to go about that abasement: SEX! Sex with NON-HUMANS! They won't stop until the captain is in a long term emotionally crippling relationship with some ALIEN WHORE-WOMAN FROM BEYOND MARS!

      RED ALERT BOYS! Keep those pants up, and set your phasers to Obliterate!

    4. Re:Tired of pinko liberal Trek! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tired of pinko liberal Trek!

      Abso-fucking-lutely!


      "Liberals in Space" I calls it, not unlike the "Pigs in Space" from the old Muppets Show: when pigs can fly. Odd that people so dedicated to destroying civilization and progress in the here and now are so busy producing propaganda for their contemporary agenda disguised as our future in space, which, thanks to them, we may never achieve.

    5. Re:Tired of pinko liberal Trek! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on! Just keep watching "Starship Troopers" over and over and over...

  63. Jeri as Seven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Jeri as Seven is rumored to be making a cameo appearance in the next (and final) TNG movie, Star Trek X:Nemesis. Also Janeway has a brief appearance... holds a conversation with Picard. Riker and Troi will get married, Riker gets promoted to become captain of the new Enterprise "E". Picard makes Admiral and finally accepts the big cheese position as commandant of the Academy. The biggest event, however, is that Data dies... in a situation that sets up too close of a parallel as when Spock "died" and came back to life.

    1. Re:Jeri as Seven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picard makes Admiral and finally accepts the big cheese position as commandant of the Academy

      Consdering his history of implied boy buggery, that's not at all a spoiler.

    2. Re:Jeri as Seven by ChiefCrazyTalk · · Score: 0

      I thought Tri and Worf were getting married?

    3. Re:Jeri as Seven by Surak · · Score: 2

      Jeri as Seven is rumored to be making a cameo appearance in the next (and final) TNG movie, Star Trek X:Nemesis

      Are you *trying* to be humourous? Final? Heh. They said the same thing about Star Trek: TMP, STII:TWOK, STIV:TVH, STV:TFF and STVI: TUC. :) There was only ever supposed to be ONE Star Trek movie. After the apparent success of that movie, Paramount, as well as the fans, asked for another one. So Harve Bennett aid, oh, ok, one more. Then when Nick Meyer had Spock die, the fans demanded that they have another one because they wanted to see what happens next... with Star Trek III, I think they knew before they were done that there would be another one, and that Leonard Nimoy would direct it. Then William Shatner decided he wanted to direct one... Star Trek VI brought back Nick Meyer for *one more* to tie it into ST:TNG, since the fans felt that there was no natural transition between TOS, the movies and ST:TNG. Then Paramount started getting crazy ideas about making money with TNG movies.

      Now, I don't think either DS9 or Star Trek: Gilligan's Island (Voyager) are strong enough to base a movie series off of. I think Enterprise is Paramount's insurance that they will be able to make more Star Trek movies, because undoubtedly this is where a LOT of revenue comes from for them. Movies spawn books, collectibles, videotapes, DVD, soundtracks etc. in a way that the series don't....there is a certain amount of luster associated with the movies that the series lack, and I'm sure Paramount realizes that.

      OF course, I'm sure your just a Paramount plant spreading disinformation... :)

    4. Re:Jeri as Seven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OF course, I'm sure your just a Paramount plant spreading disinformation... :)

      No I'm not a "Paramount plant", but I am loosely connected to tech support on some of the post-production special effects...sound, not pics :( unfortunately. Whether or not this will truly be the last TNG movie is really dependent on how much $$$ it grosses at the box office, but everybody is not all that optimistic on its profitability. One thing that's for sure, it will be the last one with Brent Spiner as Data since he is adamant about his aging not being able to realistically represent the unaging character. Do not rule out a computer-generated Data in the future. Oh how I'd love to get to work with that kind of technology.. maybe someday.

  64. The transporter keeps killing people, so... by Ruger · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I'm guessing they're using Microsoft Heisenburg Compensators and the damn things are actually still in beta!

    What would be seriously funny though is to see a few corporate logos pop up in the show. Like if they walked into engineering and there were a bunch of boxes stacked up in the corner with cow spots on them. Or maybe an Intel Pentium XXVI logo on the side of all the bridge stations.

    Ruger

    1. Re:The transporter keeps killing people, so... by why-is-it · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even better, have the transporter BSOD when it malfunctions...

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    2. Re:The transporter keeps killing people, so... by jafuser · · Score: 1

      It might be quite interesting considering this may be at a period before replicators were invented. That would mean they still need currency and businesses to provide goods. I think that would add a very unique element that isn't present in any of the existing series. They could also have elements of our current culture such as television and the Internet, which would be interesting to see in the Star Trek universe.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  65. OMFG by ioman1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is it just me or does slashdot post news that belongs to other sites. I submit news and articles related and they never get posted, yet this silly article makes it? WTF is all I have to say.

    1. Re:OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funniest thing to see... computer-related... in this new show would be Tux on a screen.

  66. Hey, wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If these parallel universe fascists already control their own universe, why the hell do they have to go to another universe-- in the freaking PAST no less-- and try to change humanity. They can just stay where they ALREADY FREAKING WON!

    1. Re:Hey, wait a minute... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a time paradox, they have to change the past to insure that the future they are in actually happens.....Remember BTTF part 2?

      Same thing happened to Spock in the cartoon series of ST, where he had to go back in time through the guardian of time to keep himself from being killed as a boy.

      Same thing happened in the ending of Voyager, Janeway goes back in time to get the crew home.

    2. Re:Hey, wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Janeway went back in time to get the crew home sooner.

  67. one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khan. KHAN! KHAN!

    actually, that's an interesting story thread that they could dust off and examine. And it would be topical to what's happening ITRW.

    1. Re:one word by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      Khan. KHAN! KHAN! actually, that's an interesting story thread that they could dust off and examine. And it would be topical to what's happening ITRW

      Of course, there's the slight problem of the Eugenics Wars of the late 1990's apparently not making the headlines...

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so ITRW, we've slipped our schedule a few years. What, like a decade or two?

  68. A few other Tidbits about the show. by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Got these from a TV Guide mag. a few weeks ago:

    - the Enterprise won't have power shields, but rather heavy armor plating.

    - no tractor beams, but it will have grappling hooks (hrm, interesting. I can see episodes now where they are going to get dragged around).

    - the aforementioned lack of transporter usage, they rely on shuttles for getting down to planets and use the transporters for non-living equipment.

    - one of the male (human) characters apparently becomes pregnant (I'm not sure how I feel about this, seems like old hokey plots...but we will see).

    - Scott Backula (Capt. Archer), looks to be even more of a womanizer than Kirk.

    Well thats enough for now, here's to waiting for the premier to see if it's gonna occupy my attention on Wed. nights.

    - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.

    - AC
    1. Re:A few other Tidbits about the show. by dinivin · · Score: 1

      Scott Backula (Capt. Archer), looks to be even more of a womanizer than Kirk.

      I think it's about time that Trek has a male captain who's a manizer (is that even a word). :-) And it should definately be Scott Bakula.

      Dinivin

    2. Re:A few other Tidbits about the show. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that wouldn't sell to the geeks. We need a female captain who isn't afraid of "taking charge" with those insulent underlings, if you know whattamean!

    3. Re:A few other Tidbits about the show. by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      one of the male (human) characters apparently becomes pregnant


      Does he go to an alternate universe where there is a female version of himself, get tanked, sleep with her, and then discover that in the alternate universe the males get pregnant?


      "For some reason she seemed to think watching two men have sex would turn me on!"

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  69. Luser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the page came down fine, telling me there was an internal error or misconfiguration on the server!

    That's the code I was originally talking about, on the server, where the internal error or misconfiguration is.

    Why am I banging my head against the concrete block attached to your shoulders? I must be almost as big a moron as you.

  70. OT but it reminds me... by Glytch · · Score: 2

    That reminds me of an episode of Gundam Wing. Heero Yui is crawling around an equipment conduit, and the viewer sees a panel marked, in english, "Intel Outside".

  71. Fashion Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Kingons had gone thru a passing fad where it was consisidered fashionable to undergo cosmetic surgery to look more like Terrans or Romulans, the two species they felt most strongly they must compete against during the times of TOS. Klingons are highly emotional creatures and thus it is not so far-fetched to consider a "fashion statement" to have been part of their history.

    1. Re:Fashion Fad by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      There's nothing more amusing than watching Trekkies trying to rationalise the irrational. Epicycles in the Ptolomeaic model got nothing on this.

      But here's my take. The episodes we watch are stories, legends, plain and simple. And like many legends (and accepted history) it's frequently in contradiction.

  72. Potentially interesting sf scenario... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh, certainly. In the end, "It's The Writing, Stupid!" The vehicle only matters in that it allows the good writers to do good work. Having one alternative humanity is okay, but infinite multiple alternative humanities -- a la "Sliders" (a show that took advantage of its premise less often than "Star Trek") -- has possibilities.


    I totally agree. Even if they had the best plot setup in the world, writers could still screw it up and totally miss the possible moral issues that could be explored. Conversely, they could have a crap setup for the show, and the writers could still use it to explore deep moral issues and to hold up the mirror to humanity and force ourselves to take a closer look. And I'd prefer the later to the former.


    Think about it. If one alternative future can come back and mess around with the past...what's to keep any number of alternative futures from trying the same? :)


    Take that one step further, and you have a very strange (and potentially intersting scenario.) Have a universe where alternate futures keep traveling back into the past to change history - and end up fighting each other. A war torn past where the futures spend more time in the past fighting each other than accomplishing thier goals. Which, of course, would end up really screwing up the future. Now that could be a bizzare premise for a book / series...

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  73. Bring back Morden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what *I* want!

    1. Re:Bring back Morden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes he was one of my fav bad guys .... the day of the dead episode shouldnt be his last.

    2. Re:Bring back Morden! by am+2k · · Score: 1
      [Q] was one of my fav bad guys
      He is not a "bad" guy. There's no black and white.
  74. R u CT? by puhtime2go · · Score: 0

    I kind of think so, because you are ranting and raving like a baby. WTFC if HTTP 200 means it worked--the server is f-ed up.

    --
    Puh! +im3 2 g0!
    1. Re:R u CT? by puhtime2go · · Score: 0

      I meant to reply to the post below this. The first dude is who I'm agreeing with... szldkbn lzx nd, s dg gsa v gxbdzgd a No Carrier

      --
      Puh! +im3 2 g0!
  75. Your typical male ST geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your typical male ST geek doesn't get ...

    Your typical male ST geek only gets dates with Rosy Palmer anyway so what would it matter?

  76. Transporter solution. by simetra · · Score: 1

    Why, why, why, why, don't they just make a backup copy of the person on the input side of transporting? That way, if they're killed, either by bad guys, or in transit, they can be restored.
    If they have the technology to transport, they surely have the technology to back them up.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Transporter solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you the one who is going to kill the backup?

    2. Re:Transporter solution. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Theres got to be a pseudological reason for it.

      The same pseudological reason that the ability for phasers to fire in a wide-beam is lost between TOS and TNG [besides dramatic effect]

      Also the reason why the ships phasers can't be used to stun an entire feild of people [ again, TOS ]

      Why can't the doctor be backed up in voyager [ Except, of course, for that one convienent period in "Living Witness" ]

      Why haven't the borg absolutely PUMMELED earth? Past, present, or future... Get a few tactical cubes [ why do the borg need tactical cubes ] and just let earth have it once and for all.. GO BORG!

      Why the enterprise-D didn't have multiple phaser emitters on the saucer rather than two large ones - it would have made more tactical sense, both/all could fire at the same time, hitting the same target! argh!

      And i still stand by my idea that they should have made a few mini-movies centering around the excelsior.

      P.S. I am the prototypical Simpson's "Comic Store guy".

    3. Re:Transporter solution. by majestyk2000 · · Score: 0

      P.S. I am the prototypical Simpson's "Comic Store guy".

      Best. Analysis. Ever.

    4. Re:Transporter solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple: The act of recreating the item destroys the information necessary to create it. Time to catch up on your quantum mechanics!

    5. Re:Transporter solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Simple: The act of recreating the item destroys the information necessary to create it. Time to catch up on your quantum mechanics!"

      ..so much for that "duplicate Ryker" episode..

    6. Re:Transporter solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why, why, why, why, don't they just make a backup copy of the person on the input side of transporting? That way, if they're killed, either by bad guys, or in transit, they can be restored."

      Same reason telepaths had all those rules in B5 - keeps the show from having a Deux Ex Machina to bail characters out of bad situations.

      As if ST didn't invent enough of THOSE already..

    7. Re:Transporter solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you don't trust the transporter to transport you without killing you, are you suddenly going to trust it to make a perfect backup every time?


      Murphy's law says that when the transporter kills you, the backup is also going to be corrupt.

    8. Re:Transporter solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wanted to say what a great term "tactical cube" is. Beautifully hokey or something like that.

      "So, what weapons do you have?"
      "Well, we have cubes."
      "I see. And you plan on wiping us out with some basic three-dimensional shapes?"
      "Well, they are quite tactical..."
      "Ah, really. And do these devices have a name?"
      "Yes, we call them tactical cubes."
      "Very imaginative."
      "They're tactical, they're cubes, they're tactical cubes..."
      "You know, one of my cubes went tactical once but I had it cut off."
      "Is that so?"
      "Engineer Nordstrom, now HE had these tactical pubes. Quite bizarre, it was, but they got us out of many a precarious situation."
      "That must have been very useful."
      "Yes, but not pleasant to look at."
      "Anyway, I'm a Borg, obviously, though apparently my Hugh Grant impression circuit is misfiring, and I'm very sorry, your butterdish is lovely, but I'm afraid I'm very much going to ... er... going to have to kill you."
      "Oh, okay then. With a tactical cube I suppose."
      "Yes, with a tactical cube. Alright, you've had your fun. Now prepare to be assimilated or whatever it is we folk usually say."
      "Can I just ask one last thing?"
      "I suppose."
      "Can you get these things in other shapes? I mean, tactical cubes are all well and good, but they might not fit the decor very well. Do you have the option, for instance, of tactical pyramids or perhaps a nice tactical sphere?"
      "No."
      "No?"
      "No. They don't stack well."
      "Oh. Well, thanks anyway."

  77. Trekkies movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right - and it has happened.
    Last year, me & some friends - general sci-fi fans, but not fanatics or anything - rented the "Trekkies" movie. I'll tell you now that NOTHING else we have ever watched has ever boosted our self-esteem like watching that!
    It has some of the saddest people I have ever seen, my favorites-

    -The dentist who has his clinic themed as a Starfleet station

    -The couple in their 60s with the poodle dressed in ST uniform

    -The lady who - I swear - is stalking Brent Spiner (Cmdr. Data) and gets a HUGE boost out of the fact that she lives less than 1 mile from his house (one of the big Texas cities - Houston, Dallas-FW, or Austin, I forget)

    and lastly....
    the fat guy who spends his time writing FOLK SONGS about Star Trek characters - he even gets to play and sing one all about Khan from the TOS ep - "The Space Seed"

    scary SCARY! But hilarious to watch - highly recommended to any sci-fi or ST fan who wants to see how SERIOUSLY people take this stuff. Me, I'm more of a B5 fanatic, but that's another topic.... :)

    Sincerely,
    Kevin Christie
    crispiewm@hotmail.com

  78. Re:My iPaq kicks the ass of any tricorder. NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should see my tricorder wallpaper I have on my iPAQ.

    Cpt_Kirks

  79. Star Trek is a Superhero Series by joneshenry · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...and that's what concerns me about the current series. It seems to me that Paramount and/or the creative team in charge of the Star Trek franchise is deliberately trying to downplay the essence of Star Trek as not just about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances but about being able to fantasize about superheroes.

    I argue the story of Star Trek: The Original Series is not about Kirk, it's about Spock. And from my perspective, Spock is a superhero. He can read minds. He's stronger than the average human. He has extreme intelligence and knowledge. Spock's abilities quite frequently solve the episode's problem.

    Similarly Star Trek: The Next Generation has Data, even stronger than Spock. Deep Space Nine has the shapeshifter Odo. Odo is not quite as impressive as Data, so notice that Paramount has to make emergency repairs midway in the show bringing back the character of Worf, now the unbeatable fighting knight-equivalent. And Bashir has to be souped up to have extreme intelligence.

    With Star Trek I The Motion Picture, Wesley in The Next Generation, and Sisko in Deep Space Nine, Paramount establishes quite a string of humans becoming gods/prophets.

    And then there's Voyager. The Data character is degraded into the balding holographic Doctor. Kes is the female Wesley who eventually becomes a godlike being, only she's too wimpy to do anything before she leaves. The series is teetering on collapse when Paramount finally makes the sensible decision to return to the roots and bring in a new superhero, 7 of 9. Once again we have a figure who is stronger than the average human, knows more, and is struggling to deal with emotions.

    I am frustrated by what seems to be an endless repeating cycle where Paramount continues to deny the essence of the show as being about superheroes, lets the series tank a couple of years, and then finally rescues the show by increasing the powers of the characters. I think that the claim of many fans that it takes a few years for the writers to get acclimated is a myth. The writers aren't given the raw materials to work with to produce entertaining superhero stories for the first few years, then they are authorized to use good materials, then the episodes improve. They could write a thousand stories about Harry Kim or Tom Paris or whatever vanilla characters they want and never find a groove. It's strictly a decision from above when the series is to improve, and that decision is simply whether to soup up the characters as superheroes.

    As UPN was saved by adding the World Wrestling Federation's Smackdown to their lineup, maybe they can learn what makes this show successful. It's called by the wrestling fans BOOKING. Yes, it is the responsibility of the owner/promoter to make decisions to hype one wrestler over another, to promote certain wrestlers above all others for long stretches of time. The World Wrestling Federation the past two decades has been carried first by the character of Hulk Hogan, then Stone Cold Steve Austin, and now The Rock. Perhaps with careful booking in the future it will be Kurt Angle or HHH.

    There is already another niche where people who are sort of ordinary interact in a tension-filled extraordinary situation. It's called reality television. It's Survivor, Big Brother, etc. Star Trek can't match that, Star Trek doesn't pretend to be giving ordinary people off the street a shot at fame and fortune. Star Trek has to create its fantasies in a different way. It has to be booked in a different fashion, to emphasize certain characters as superheroes.

    1. Re:Star Trek is a Superhero Series by ahem · · Score: 1
      I never really thought about myself as much of a superhero fan, but cast in this light, I have to re-evaluate my tastes.

      Along these same lines, Chabon's The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay deals with this same relationship of everyman to superhero through the lens of the WWII superhero comic book explosion. I really enjoyed this book. Sammy Clay and his cousin from Prague, Josef Kavalier, battle the evils of the world of publishing by writing and drawing thier own superhero: The Escapist.

      The Escapist has the power to unlock any lock and escape from any shackles or trap. He's a symbol of every one who recognized that only they hold the key to thier own fulfillment and destiny. Josef's escape from Prague and the Holocaust and his travels around the world in search of himself form the keystone of this theme. He is always forced to rely on his own resources to acheive the goals he sets for himself and overcome the obstacles that life puts before him.

      This is much in the same way as all the Enterprises have florished based on self-sufficiency of their crews and the designated superior skills of a few individuals. The ultimate superhero is the Enterprise herself. Even though the best minds available would declare "She canna take much more o' this!", the skills of the crew and the fortitude of the ship herself would rise above the norm and save the day.

      --
      Not A Sig
    2. Re:Star Trek is a Superhero Series by Tattva · · Score: 1

      Interesting theory but you miss the point of the superhero genre. The Superhero genre has several key elements: a semi-loner with gifts, usually a backstory explaining their origins. The loner usually hides his powers and uses them in defense of a childlike worldview against unusual or also gifted enemies. Rinse, repeat. Most importantly, the superhero is invariably the focus of the show.

      Knight Rider and the Rocketeer are in the superhero genre, as (I think) they should be, but Star Trek is not. Problem-solving, magic disguised as technology and a ridiculous utopian social ideal is the focus of most ST series.

      --
      personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
    3. Re:Star Trek is a Superhero Series by angelo · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows that spock was a superhero. He was called Namor, the Sub-Mariner before his Star Trek days..

    4. Re:Star Trek is a Superhero Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It seems to me that Paramount and/or the creative team in charge of the Star Trek franchise is deliberately trying to downplay the essence of Star Trek as not just about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances but about being able to fantasize about superheroes."

      Ordinary people in extraordinary situations WAS THE WHOLE POINT. "Wagon Train To The Stars" and all that. Geeeeeeeeeeeeeeez....

    5. Re:Star Trek is a Superhero Series by quintessent · · Score: 2

      I agree with you...a little. But I don't think these superpowers are the central theme of star trek. Data may have amazing capabilities, but it is how he uses them that makes him heroic. In this sense, Wesley is never really tested as a superhero. My favorite Star Trek character is Captain Picard. He is an ordinary human, somewhat aged and weak in comparison to many. But his ingenuity allows him to overcome the most daunting of challenges. I don't think Star Trek is about people endowed with superhuman abilities as it is about people (who sometimes have unusual abilities) developing themselves to a heroic stature. Worf is not born with abilities greater than a typical Klingon, but his strength of character (focus, training, loyalty, control) allows him to face the mightiest, mentally and physically. Another interesting thing to notice is that a character's unique strengths often become their challenges. Worf's loyalty to the Klingons tests his loyalty to starfleet. Data's impeccable programming make him very valuable, but also make him vulnurable to unusual threats. In First Contact, Captain Picard's pride becomes his test as he is faced with the choice of whether to abandon ship. This is the theme I most hope to see carried on in the new series.

  80. teleporters that don't work right... by macbrak · · Score: 1

    "I teleported home one night
    With Ron and Sid and Meg.
    Ron stole Meggie's heart away
    And I got Sidney's leg."

    the late great dna

    --
    don't believe it
  81. No Prime Directive? by DavidBrown · · Score: 2

    I'm looking foward to a Star Trek without Picard/Janeway's preachy Prime Directive nonsense. If you look at TOS, the Prime Directive increased in its application between TOS and STTNG/DS9/Voyager. Janeway's use of the Prime Directive was so severe that I always thought of it as the "substantive interpretation of the Prime Directive" - much worse than TOS.

    Anyway, if you want morality plays, I'm sure that they will have several episodes in which the well-meaning crew of the Enterprise totally screws up alien civilizations, causing the Vulcan to say "I told you so" and the Earth to adopt the Prime Directive in it's TOS form.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  82. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by Rand+Race · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Curse those actors for being bilaterally symetrical humanoids! That is the problem y'know; A woefull lack of non-human shaped actors.

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  83. Bad vibes for ST:TOS fan by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


    Transporters a couple of decades after warp drive??? Phasers that don't match the TOS pilot? Bumpy headed Klingons??? Hell, they might as well have put a holodeck on the damn ship! Bet you anything they'll have a holodeck on a planet...

    Paramount is run by greedy record-executive idiots! ST:TOS was a raging sci-fi phenomenon a couple of years after its cancellation. It lasted long enough to push out a sequel show after not being on the air for ten years! You'd think they would be able to find writers and set designers that could marginally follow details set in the first series. Hollywood does this for every movie; they have geeks on the set who's job is to make sure that all the visual details match the previous take.

    And like the record industry, Paramount is going to kill this goose.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    1. Re:Bad vibes for ST:TOS fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure everyone would want to watch the new TV show with the $15 effects budget. TOS had cardboard walls and all that cheap looking stuff because that's all they could afford.

      I'm looking at this as what TOS's producers would have made the Enterprise look like if they had the money to do so. Sort of like what Lucas did to the Star Wars movies, only applied to a new series.

  84. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by isorox · · Score: 2

    (Of course, we never did see the TOS bowling alley. Maybe they'll have one.)

    I'd love to play with the artifiial gravity on one of those!

  85. Zelazny story by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

    Don't remember the title exactly, but there was a Roger Zelazny short story called something like "THe Game of Blood and Dust" that told of beings that played with human history.

  86. Trek Books in general by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

    Unluckly, due to lack of time I've quit reading the books for about the last 6 months or so. I also REALLY enjoyed the New Frontier series with the Excalibur and it's crew members. Think Worf was a badass security officer? The Excalibur's security officer makes him look like a pansy - the guy is made of stone (I believe the name of his race was Brikar or something like that - they are living stone creatures.) All the characters on that ship are just... strange, but cool to learn about. Plus, they also have some characters from the TNG series - Morgan Lefler (her mom is also interesting), the gal that wanted Riker's job for awhile is the first officer, and the CMO is from the TNG series.


    Granted, with the ST book series there have been some real dogs. There's a couple of the TNG books that I consider to be worse than the worse TNG episodes. But all in all, you are right - the ST books in general are of higher quality, and offer the opportunity for the characters to be explored much more deeply.


    For those thinking about reading any of the books, here's a 'must read' list: Vendetta, Imzadi II, the entire New Frontier series, Prime Directive, Dark Mirror, and anything Peter David writes in the different series. :-)


    As for the Voyager books... well, they really don't seem to improve on the series any with some exceptions. Still not a Voyager fan (which is horrible when ya consider I think I've seen all of them. Sheesh.)

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  87. Evil mirror universes we would like to see... by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1
    Archer: Look at that strange looking moon...


    1st Officer: That's no moon, that's a battlestation!

    Computer: Red Alert! Hostile boarding party in sector 8

    Archer: Set phasers to stun!

    Vader: [vwaammmm....} click .... ahhhhhhhh...[zwap zoom...zwoop]

    Archer: Thud.

    --

  88. It's Bolians.. by angelo · · Score: 1

    Bolians! Not Tholians!

    What's a postercomment compression filter? Is it some sort of lameness^2 filter?

  89. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by synthe · · Score: 1

    Those were Bolians, not Tholians. Tholians are evidently energy based or somehow hard for people to look at. The big tapestry that hangs in Quark's is supposedly a portrait of a famous Tholian general.

  90. Jar Jar by infinite9 · · Score: 2

    These evil villains are from the future and the mirror universe.



    Let us all hope and pray that this visitor from a parrallel universe isn't Jar Jar.



    Oh, wait, that was a long time ago. And in a galaxy far, far away.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  91. Lexx Season 1 on DVD? by brood · · Score: 1

    to be nitpicky, I think you mean season two.
    Season One, aired only on Showtime(?) as "Tales from a Parallel Universe", is still only available on VHS. Season two, however, where the Sci-Fi channel picked the series up at, was recently released on DVD a couple of months ago. Lexx is now up to Season four.
    Coincidentally, my Lexx DVD's are en route as well ;)

    1. Re:Lexx Season 1 on DVD? by Talaran · · Score: 1

      To nitpick the nitpicker, the first four Lexx movies (which are also called Series 1) ARE available on DVD - check videoflicks.com. And Sci-Fi US did air those movies, after they finished airing Series 2.

      But yeah ... three of the Series 2 DVDs have been released this year, which means two more to go for the complete season. Series 3 should be available sometime next year.

  92. You must be from an alternate universe by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1


    to bring us insightful comments involving Hulk Hogan. The fans must be much different where you're from.

    Thanks for visiting!

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  93. still trying to figure out how many years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've wasted watching ST, TNG, DSN, V, and movies

    comically reminds me of how the AP reported the USA GNP would be down the year everyone (except me) was watching the OJ trial.

  94. Where are the pyjamas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, it can't be Trek without uniforms that look like pyjamas...

  95. Sentient Android banging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How many starships had a sentient android who banged Tasha Yar working onboard?

    I always wanted to see Data meet Seven, and tell her upon initial meeting," I'm fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques!" nudge-nudge, wink-wink. That would be hillarious.

  96. It's got the guy from Quantum Leap... by Tviokh · · Score: 1

    ...as the captain.
    That's more than enough reason for me to avoid it. ;)

    TNG was the last series I was actually able to watch without wanting to throw a brick at the television..mainly because I just have a thing for Patrick Stewart.

    TOS...I can watch it endlessly..through all the cheesiness, cheap props, cheap sets, fake looking aliens, lame predictable plots, Kirk thinking he's god's gift to everybody, etc..etc..and I never get bored.

    I tried to sit through DS9 once. Made it about 10 minutes before I had to change channels.
    Thought "maybe I just caught it on an off night", and tried watching it 5 or so more times.
    Just couldn't get into it.
    I will have to admit to liking the Tribbles episode, however.

    VOY..same thing...I've tried, I've really tried to like it(my boyfriend's son is a fan, so it's on pretty frequently), and just plain don't.

    --
    http://pebkac.net
  97. damn transporters . . . by hawk · · Score: 2
    I thought those were the drivers . ..


    anyway, I'd like to see them gone, gone, gone.


    The enterprise had transporters for a very simple reason: the special effects budget couldn't handle a weekly landing.


    They were aware of the danger that these would be a worse plot than Commander Cleavage, and thus the comment or two about the danger of intra-ship use, etc. They seemed to have forgotten this by the time that spinoff occurred, and techno-babble became a substitute for a plot . . .


    hawk

  98. It would be seriously funnier if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We saw TUX appear on some of the computer screens.

  99. That seems right by shd99004 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you both are right, and that could make for some entertaining Star Trek for sure.

    --
    Will work for bandwidth
  100. nah, that's science fiction by hawk · · Score: 2
    sci-fi is the mad scientist, freak monster, etc. type of stuff . . .


    hawk

  101. Terra Uber Alles by hawk · · Score: 2
    . . . is the category of SF that you're looking for. It seems to have gone out of style, and is generally only found in short stories rather than novels, but they exist . . .and some are *really* well done


    hawk

  102. Re:Maybe because the actors are human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MODERATORS: Read the subject of the parent post, it is somewhat on topic. I was using humor to explain why most "aliens" in sci-fi are humanoid. But youse moderators are a bunch of humorless drones on a search and destroy mission for "no good shits". Just because you don't understand the reference doesn't make it a troll.

  103. Re:Not enough silicone-based life forms on TOS by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Did you realize that according to the TOS specs, every crew quarter had a Jacuzzi?

    Of course, I imagine that the original blueprints are no longer canon.

    "Mr. Scott, more power to the Jacuzzis!"

    "Ach Captain, the engines canna take it. There's just ten minutes, and all yer old girlfriends will break through: The Romulan Commander, The Blue Chick, The Blind Chick, Brain-Brain, Lights-in-the-sky (2000 Quatloos!), Miramony his wife (3rd season), The Alternate Universe Chick, somebody from Talos III and all the rest, we canna hold out!"

    "Captain, sensors detect a Genesis device being aimed at us. For the safety of the ship, the logical thing would be to toss you out in an escape pod and run for it. Needs of the many and all that."

    "Damn you and your Vulcan logic, but let's do it!"

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  104. Saved by the transporter? by nexusone · · Score: 1

    I am a big startrek fan and don't get me wrong, but after the last season of Voyager.
    It really started to blow big chunks on the plots.
    I am fear that with the same guy behind the wheel of Enterprise, it may well be the death of Startrek for TV.
    Think mide season they will bring back Worf to save the show?
    Things that I see that I don't like.

    The ship look's too much like the Voyager.
    The set's look more advanced then the old Startrek series.
    I think that the captain should be a bit more rough around the edges, and not so PC.
    Maybe Tim Allen would be better?

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  105. Symbols... by DrCode · · Score: 2

    Just curious, but what did "tribbles" symbolize?

    1. Re:Symbols... by dorward · · Score: 1
      What did "tribbles" symbolize?
      That it is possible to have too much of a good thing.
    2. Re:Symbols... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just curious, but what did "tribbles" symbolize?"

      "Too much of any good thing, even love, is TOO MUCH!"

      That and, "Know your small furry lifeforms lest they eat you out of house & home."

    3. Re:Symbols... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you're pets are neutered/spayed.

    4. Re:Symbols... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • but what did "tribbles" symbolize?

      The mindless consumer, warm and happy in her/his fuzzy idyll of screwin' and chewin'.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  106. Time travel is death to quality SF by Christopher+Biggs · · Score: 1

    Once you introduce time travel, you have painted yourself into a corner.

    Once the "go back in time and fix things" crutch has been employed once, the slippery slope to sloppy scriptwriting and unimaginative stories has started.

    Time travel has ruined Star Trek for me.

    --
    -- veni vidi nuclei deceri --- I came, I saw, I dumped core.
    1. Re:Time travel is death to quality SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Once the "go back in time and fix things" crutch has been employed once, the slippery slope to sloppy scriptwriting and unimaginative stories has started."

      The only show I ever saw that got it right was B5, where the single use of time travel was integral to the overall arc, so much so that its effects could be seen (in retrospect) in the series pilot and many episodes leading up to The Big Jump Back.

      Not bad at all. Shows what can happen when someone actually thinks about five years' worth of story.

  107. Mirror, Mirror in Original Series and Next Gen by vbprgrmr · · Score: 1

    He might be referring to 'Mirror, Mirror' in the Original series, one of the best early Treks with Spock sporting a beard and Sulu and Checkov totally and gleefully bad in the Mirror Universe. Also, there was an episode in Next Generation where almost an infinite number of Enterprises meet in some Nexus of alternate universes. I forget the details on that one though.

  108. The research we never hear about by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

    Sounds good to me, except what about all those little projects that get the sidelines? HA! Real time fur (on) my ass... what about the the BSOD toothbrush? Not much is known about the research they put into packaging. I would have never thought of taking a regular PC and turning it into a game console. How about that research on how to print holograms on the a CD face? Can they do that on Billy's face? That would be cool.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  109. "Star Trek Enterprise" Titbits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry... The new series is called "Enterprise", not "Star Trek Enterprise".

    They did it on purpose.....


    I really wish the /. editors would do a tiny bit of research sometimes.....

  110. Re:Not enough silicon-based life forms on Star Tre by Emperor+Cezar · · Score: 1

    The predominatly humanoid aliens first came about because TOS had such a low budget. It was a lot cheaper to have a guy show up in every episode with some points on his ears than it was to paint him blue and stick an arm on his back. I also believe that a Trek with not-so-humanoid characters would not have been as good. Because, you can relate to something that looks like you. In addition, TNG explained why almost all the aliens in the series were humanoid. Four billion years ago a race explored the galaxy and found that no other races were like them. So, the put thier genetic makeup into as many world premordial soup as they possibly could. Bang, bing, and out came humaniod races arould a few billion years.

  111. Give it a rest already by mikefoley · · Score: 1

    None of you have even seen the show.

    Some of you think TNG was the best thing since sex. TNG was seriously flawed in the first year or two because Roddenberry, bless his heart, was recycling all his old TOS and '70's Planet Earth/Genesis II scripts. To us older folks who grew up with TOS (and it was a BIG deal to see it in COLOR!!), the first couple of years of TNG was alot of repeats.

    Give this one a chance. One thing Trekkies (and Slashdotters alike) due is kill the baby before it's even born. Put down your coding pencil...er...mouse and take a Prozac and chill.

    --
    What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
  112. mirror universe?? i don't think so by rlwhite · · Score: 1

    This is the first I've heard of the conspirators from the future being from the mirror universe, and I doubt it's true. I've seen a leaked draft of the pilot's script, and I can at least say that their identity is not revealed in that draft.

    The idea of it being people from the mirror universe simply doesn't sound plausible given what's known about the new series and the mirror universe of DS9. The Terrans of DS9 had to borrow plans for the Defiant and had little knowledge of the ST universe. The time travel, genetic engineering, and understanding of ST universe history necessary to manage the conspiracy would be beyond them for a good while after their liberation. I don't mind the idea of a "Temporal Cold War", but making the future aliens be from the mirror universe is too far-fetched for me, and I won't believe it's true until I see it on TV.

    I think I'd rather see the conspirators be post-DS9 humans from the ST universe. Perhaps Section 31. But if they were going to do that plot, they should've shown us the post-DS9 Federation first. It could've been interesting (and still might be done eventually)- after the war with the Dominion, the Federation is in shambles. Relations with the other empires have been shaken up, peace and trade have been disturbed, and Earth has experienced martial law for the first time in quite a while. Perhaps we might even have seen the Federation unravel. But the future would definitely be different from the civilization that showed up in TNG and DS9.

  113. don't rag on the holodeck! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2


    Because Captain Proton will come and kick your silly little butt! Captain Proton was the most original thing in any of the ST series, and, amazingly, it came from ST:Voyager!

  114. Not enough silicone-based life forms on Star Trek by sapwizard · · Score: 1

    Definitely need more characters like 7 of 9.

  115. Gabby Johnson is right! by SharpNose · · Score: 1

    Joneshenry makes a good point. These "superhero" angles only work for me when they have to play their superiority against ordinary things like humor, love, lust, or common decency. As a writer, it seems like time and time again you would be trotting that out, or its doppelganger, the "Achilles' Heel:" Spock can't love, Seven can't carry on a normal conversation (with arguably the best ass on series television, does she really NEED to?), Data can't laugh. My question is, though, are these superheroes really effective dramatic characters by virtue of their special powers? I contend no. The episodes that stick out in my mind as being good television for any genre are those where it is ordinary things like courage, loyalty, sense of right/wrong that drives the characters, even the superheroes. It reminds me of a book I read about TV SF going all the way back to Outer Limits that said that writers were instructed by the producers that every episode needed a "bear" (Vaudeville term for the guy in a bear suit that would be sent onstage when a skit was going badly) - that one thing that was supposed to strike awe, fear, and wonder into the viewer. That mentality drives much of the history of TV SF (does anyone recall the Buck Rogers in the 25th Century where an otherwise fairly serviceable dramatic episode had a "bear" of poor Mark Lenard removing his head??) Some of the best TV SF episodes I remember had little or no "bear" because the writers knew how to write DRAMA for characters.

  116. Parallel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's a parallel universe and set before TOS, then they MUST (contractually) have an episode about having evil doubles.

    With beards.

    Including the women.

  117. Re:Pilot Script Available Here: by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    What??
    You mean that you haven't read the entire script yet?

    And you call yourself a Geek :(

    Available here:

    www.btinternet.com/~harrymudd/imudd/BrokenBow.tx t

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
  118. stenterprise.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As always, for the latest news about Star Trek: Enterprise, check out stenterprise.com.

  119. Fritz Leiber did this already for a Hugo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when he won for his Change War novel, "The Big Time", still in print.

    C. J. Cherryh stole this wonderful idea and wrote her supposedly fantasy but actually diamond hard S. F. series starting with (I think) "The Gates of Ivriel".

    There are actually very few new ideas in hard S.F., which is why writing ability is so important. The difference between, say, "The Forever War" and "Armor" is not about the plot, but style.

    1. Re:Fritz Leiber did this already for a Hugo... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

      ...when he won for his Change War novel, "The Big Time", still in print.


      Hmm - ok, well, it apparently was a very good idea after all! (Quickly jots down boot name to add to the 'to read' list ;-)

      --

      Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  120. Is your memory failing its checksum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a famous Earth historian who went to a planet and *set up* a Nazi government to demonstrate (or replicate) its supposed efficiency in industrial growth but intended to avoid the xenophobia and aggression. So, the "Planet of the Nazis" was a cheap screenwriter's trick to avoid set and costume expenses since they already had the uniforms and sets from other productions.

  121. And of course later stolen for that well - known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    children's S.F. book about silicon creatures: "Horta hears a Who"!!!

  122. Which ST do you mean? by Kasreyn · · Score: 2

    "modern" ST or the original series?

    In the original series there was quite an attempt made at keeping rigorous science. Guys were called in from NASA etc. Experts were hired for ideas. Scripts were put through many rewrites. (and yes, I know about the "no sounds in space" thing. There was no other way.)

    ST today is particle of the week space opera, of course. Originally, it was much more. Of course, Gene always used science fiction the same way he used any other medium, as a device with which to tell the story he wanted to tell, which always involved people and their stories. The weakness of modern star trek is the storytelling is all based on so-called "science fiction" as the be-all and end-all, rather than on the interactions of the characters involved in the drama.

    The original series was good drama. Modern star trek is good eye candy. Now, which did you mean? ;-)

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.