Slashdot Mirror


(CD) Pirates Take to the Ocean

rammstein_rulz writes "www.cdfreaks.com reports that asian CD pirates now produce thousands of pirated VCD's on anchored ships in international waters to avoid getting caught. Malaysian marine police have been asked to be on the lookout for pirate ships"

308 comments

  1. I wanna say it first... by GeekyMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    ARRR... hoist the jolly roger and walk the plank

    --
    Beware the fury of a patient man
    - John Dryden
    1. Re:I wanna say it first... by The+Importance+of · · Score: 4, Funny

      LawMeme has an entire post on this in pirate lingo - Shiver Me Timbers! Pirates Take to the High Seas

    2. Re:I wanna say it first... by jmardres · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Quick, put one finger in each side of your mouth and say "I was burnt on a pirate ship" :) Make sure that there are no impressionable minds around when you do this... :)

      --
      FAMOUS LAST WORDS: Ha! They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist...
    3. Re:I wanna say it first... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2

      You're too late! Worldwide Talk Like a Pirate Day was back on Sept 20th!

    4. Re:I wanna say it first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooh, PIR8 Vinny can branch out now

    5. Re:I wanna say it first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm kinda slow and I don't get the joke.
      Could ya please splain it?

    6. Re:I wanna say it first... by uberdave · · Score: 2

      When I was growing up, the phrase was "I was BORN on a pirate ship". By pulling your mouth open to a wide grin with your fingers, you distort the pronunciation of the phrase. "Pirate" sounds like "pile of" and the P in "ship" sounds like a T.

  2. International Waters by kila_m · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they are in international waters.. what are the legal implications ? Whos Jurisdiction etc .. would they come under ?

    1. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The RIAA's. Just wait for them to start issuing letters of marquee.

    2. Re:International Waters by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      I think the problem will be selling/distributing (under some national land and laws) not making

    3. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I get the feeling that the USA will take this "burden" upon its self.

    4. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Actually, very few laws exist in international waters. That's why whaling and such is legal when boats get far enough out. Some countries have laws covering what you can and can't do as a citizen even outside of the country, but to my knowledge it's perfectly legal to sink a ship if it's attempting to commit piracy or other theft of goods.

      I think I heard something about the Malaysians, with the support of some movie companies, planning to launch a few 'enforcer' vessels to this effect.

    5. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I believe that a vessel in internation waters is subject to the laws of its flag country -- the country in which the vessel is registered.

    6. Re:International Waters by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Marque. But kudos for knowing the word!

      I'm just glad to finally see the convergence of software and floating piracy. I, for one, will proudly say 'arr' every time I use a bit of pirated software. (On my friend's computer, that is!)

      Arrrrr!

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    7. Re:International Waters by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, very few laws exist in international waters. That's why whaling and such is legal when boats get far enough out. Some countries have laws covering what you can and can't do as a citizen even outside of the country, but to my knowledge it's perfectly legal to sink a ship if it's attempting to commit piracy or other theft of goods.

      Wrong, the law of the sea is probably the most extensively litigated aspect of international law. International law was originally invented to cover the sea. The London Times reports on maritime law cases all the time.

      The basic principle is that every ship is registered in a national shipping registry and is subject to the laws of that country. So if a ship is registered in Panama the laws of Panama apply.

      A ship that does not have a registration is subject to the laws of any nation that cares to enforce them. An unregistered ship is likely to be seized each time it calls at a port.

      It would not be legal for a merchant ship to attack another for any reason other than self defense. However a coastguard or navy vessel can do so.

      One wonders if the story is a spoof since being at sea does nothing to improve the legal situation and the mechanics of producing CDs on board a ship do not sound promissing, I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    8. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not doing it because they think it is legal. They seem to be doing it because they can "hide" a little better at sea. Plus, if they are carefull, they can drop them all off at their next port.

    9. Re:International Waters by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well the legal status is probably similar to the radio stations that used to broadcast from offshore to holland. I don't know if this happenend anywhere else but the the netherlands is a small country with the heavy population centers near the coast. So a ship in international waters could reach a sizeable part of the population. This was done to avoid the laws on radio regulation and to avoid having their equipment seized constantly. The police could only interfere when a storm would knock the vessel into national waters.

      The same probably applies here. The pressed CD's don't suddenly become legal but the police won't be able to seize the equipment involved as long as it stays out at sea. Of course the old radio pirates went on to become legal radio/tv stations when it was shown that a large portion of the citizens supported them. I doubt the same will occur with cd-pirates.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    10. Re:International Waters by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One wonders if the story is a spoof since being at sea does nothing to improve the legal situation and the mechanics of producing CDs on board a ship do not sound promissing, I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      Agreed, personally I saw this as an April-fools type story when I saw it: It sounds more like the fabrication of someone who was trying to think of a real pseudo-ironic (not literally ironic, but in the manner that most people use the term ironic): "Isn't that ironic? They're producing CDs, making themselves pirates, on ships! HAHA!". Legally, as you said, this has zero merit. The excuse that they're doing it to avoid detection has no validity either: One can hide a dupe machine anywhere with zero chance of getting caught-> Getting caught comes when you start to sell the product and the authorities work themselves up the chain until they're busting in your door.

      I'd love to here from someone in Malaysian confirming this story, because personally it sounds like BS.

    11. Re:International Waters by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An AC wrote:

      > I believe that a vessel in internation waters is
      > subject to the laws of its flag country -- the
      > country in which the vessel is registered.

      Then these ships must fly a gold sun cross on a field of blue, the flag of that island whose language is song. Its divine Queen has never recognized the property rights, real or "intellectual", of the media sharks before ("Mosura" 1961, "Mosura tai Gojira" 1964, or "Gojira, Ebira, Mosura: Nankai no Dai Ketto" 1966), and I don't see her starting anytime soon.

      Seriously, I think it bears pointing out that these ships are pressing VCDs of movies so we are talking MPAA here -- let us get our sharks straight. The market for these unauthorized copies is to people in the region who would never, ever, be able to afford a full price DVD. As with software, cheap versions of the hardware is a seriously major purchase for them (assuming they don't just use a computer at an internet cafe). Just forget about their having anything but pocket change to pay for the software/movies/etc. The street vendors hawking these unauthorized copies sell at what the market would bear. The media sharks do not sell to these people, so there is demand, but not much money, and no legitimate products to fill the demand.

      The people out in boats making these VCDs are *not* real pirates. They do not hijack ships, murder, or rape (at least, that we know of). Yes, they are breaking a law, but so is the average American who speeds on the way to work, parks without paying the meter, or lies on income tax forms.

      If the media sharks were remotely interested in actually putting an end to this terrible crime, they'd sign these "pirates" on as local distributors for a cut of their profits! The people get their movies at a price they can afford, the newly ordained distributors can conduct their business under more pleasant conditions, and the police can save their efforts for those who continue to prefer breaking the law and, gasp, actual murderers! The sharks save money on enforcement, and make a little money from their new distributors.

      But no, that would be common sense. We can't have that!

      Bells are ringing: Mothra, Mothra! Every heart is calling: Mothra, Mothra!
      Come on, Tok Wira, these sharks have gotta pay! New Kirk calling Mothra, we need you today!

      G Countdown: 23 days (www.godzillaoncube.com)

    12. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no such thing as international waters. that is an illusion only enforceable by arms. Pieces of paper signed by liars conveniently forgotten about on a whim. For instance, the US already rams, fires upon and sinks and kills the people involved (if the feel like it and need some sport for their floating mercenaries or if the people "flee" ) drug shipments they don't approve of in international waters. Now authorized cia drug shipments are OK, or those authorised by dea cowboys. Hmm, like the clinton/bush axis shipments routed through mena for years, those were "authorised". Those are cool. The "law" ONLY exists for those with the most and biggest guns and that's it. The pirates will make their vcd's as long as someone is paid off, with the occasional "example" made.

    13. Re:International Waters by chamenos · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm not from malaysia, but i'm from singapore, which is just south of malaysia.

      i personally don't think this story is false, as the state of lawlessness in malaysia can be quite bad at times.

      just a year or two ago, bandits masqueraded as military officials and stole over a hundred M16s from a malaysian armoury in broad daylight. another bunch of them stole some steyr AUGs, and both gangs went on a spate of robberies before the authorities managed to catch up with them.

      in view of the above, i don't think malaysian software pirates shifting their base of operations to a ship is that unlikely =) besides, the malaysian authorities recent clamp-down on software pirates has been quite well publicized so such a reaction from the pirates may not be that far-fetched.

    14. Re:International Waters by sadtrev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is plenty of trade in Pirate software, VCDs and, over the past 6 months DVDs made in Malaysia and sold in Johore Bharu - just over the causeway from Singapore at abut Rm8 (US$1.50) each. Most of these are for the local (ASEAN) market but I have seen plenty of examples of DVDs that are targeted at expatriates and business travellers.
      As for police reinforcement - I've seen it for myself - In a shopping mall called Holiday Plaza where a lot of the pirate electronics is openly traded - all the stalls will close down for half a day every month or so. The police will perform a token raid, fine any traders that didn't pay the bribe beforehand and leave.
      Business can then proceed.
      I suspect that the authorities are slightly more serious about staming down on the manufacture rather than the sale of contraband CDs but even so, a Royal Malaysian Navy patrol vessel raiding a token pirate ship will serve nothing more than government propaganda. One or two stories on the evening news.
      The Singaporeans will say they were Malaysian, the malaysians will say they were Indonesian and the Indonesians will say they were Chinese.

    15. Re:International Waters by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      It may not improve the legal situation - but frankly its harder to find and sieze ships that are 18-20 miles off the shore.

    16. Re:International Waters by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      Hm. I think newer ship designs, using deep pontoons for flotation rather than hull-on-the-water, can achieve vibration and roll free sailing.

      Or, you could build some bizarre suspension system for the burning factory.

      So, it's possible that it could be done. Interesting story.

    17. Re:International Waters by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      "If the media sharks were remotely interested in actually putting an end to this terrible crime, they'd sign these "pirates" on as local distributors for a cut of their profits! The people get their movies at a price they can afford, the newly ordained distributors can conduct their business under more pleasant conditions, and the police can save their efforts for those who continue to prefer breaking the law and, gasp, actual murderers!"

      Yes, but if they did do that, the reasonably priced products might find their way into the marketplaces of the Northern Economic Bloc, and they don't want that to happen.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    18. Re:International Waters by mbogosian · · Score: 2

      One wonders if the story is a spoof since being at sea does nothing to improve the legal situation and the mechanics of producing CDs on board a ship do not sound promissing, I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      Maybe they learned everything they know about law in international waters from the the Simpsons....

    19. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, it's possible, but it seems a bit like what people say about James Bond villians. It's all overly elaborate and unnecessarily expensive. This is a criminal enterprise about producing CDs as cheaply as possible to sell as many as possible. Such a ship would be expensive and a flashy high tech ship would probably draw unnecessary attention without camoflage (which would be easier for a land operation).

      I mean, if marijuana(?sp?) operations in North America are any indication, you could probably do it in your basement or rent office space for your operations without much chance of detection. If you want portability, it would be cheaper to use container boxes on tractor trailers. You could ship your operations quickly to other locations if you wished.

    20. Re:International Waters by pyrote · · Score: 0

      What a load....
      First off anyone who goes through this effort isn't a "humanitarian" trying to save the pocketbooks of his fellow countrymen. $0 (or minimal) investment with 100% profit is why they are doing this.

      Boo hoo, they can't afford DVD's, hell I cant afford the latest release either. I only have crap that came from the bargin bin at wallys. I'm not about to strike a deal with Sony so that some Techno starved 3rd world country can see the Matrix.

      Honestly, with enough profit and traffic this business brings with it other forms of Law breaking maybee '...gasp, actual murders!'.

      Sorry to rant, but this is not some modern day robin hood. it's simply crime.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    21. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look that boat over there is re-broadcasting Major League baseball with implied oral consent not express written consent.

      (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!)

    22. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>>Sorry to rant, but this is not some modern day robin hood. it's simply crime.

      Actually I would disagree with you. Car theft is simply crime but pirate boats floating in international waters loaded with electronics producing bootleg media has some kind of truly romantic cyberpunkish feel to it.

    23. Re:International Waters by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I thought they already had.. isn't that what this latest "license to hack" bill is all about??

      Of course, back in the day, there was often no practical difference between privateers and pirates...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    24. Re:International Waters by 1qaz2wsx · · Score: 1

      > If the media sharks were remotely interested in actually putting an end to this terrible crime, they'd sign these "pirates" on as local distributors for a cut of their profits!

      Of course, if greed had any bounds, Martha Stewart would not have destroyed a business worth millions to save thousands in an about to die stock, and Tyco CEOs would not be led off in handcuffs for stiffing New York for sales tax on million dollar paintings....

      --
      --- I would prefer a prehensile tail....
    25. Re:International Waters by PLBogen · · Score: 0

      The United States has a law that obligates all Americans abroad to follow U.S. Law.

    26. Re:International Waters by mpe · · Score: 2

      Yup, it's possible, but it seems a bit like what people say about James Bond villians. It's all overly elaborate and unnecessarily expensive. This is a criminal enterprise about producing CDs as cheaply as possible to sell as many as possible. Such a ship would be expensive and a flashy high tech ship would probably draw unnecessary attention without camoflage (which would be easier for a land operation).

      Unless it gets to difficult to do things like paying the manager of a pressing plant to run off a few (thousand) extra...

    27. Re:International Waters by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? "License to hack" bill?

      --

      +++ATH0
    28. Re:International Waters by Reziac · · Score: 2

      The one that lets the RIAA have their way with P2P networks; much-discussed hereabouts over the past month.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    29. Re:International Waters by pyrote · · Score: 1

      I'll admit, it is cool but to boil it down it's just crime. actually I recently saw a simpsons episode where homer went off shore so he could get alcohol after midnight. it had people copying videos and stuff in international waters. fitting for a current story.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  3. Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    England certainly still has the death penalty for this (along with treason and one other I cannot remember).. does this mean we are going to start seeing people hang again? ;)

    1. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by ColdGrits · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Off topic I know, but the third crime for which the UK (not just England, please note) has the death penalty is "arson in a naval dockyard".

      Mind you, the thought of software pirates swinging from the gallows is an interesting image! Althogh I think hanging Spammers would be more likely to meet with universal support :-)

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    2. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Krapangor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nonsense. There is no death penalty in any state of the European Union. We are civilized people here. That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      --
      Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    3. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On 27 January 1999, the UK Home Secretary (The Labour MP Jack Straw) signed the 6th protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights in Strasbourg. This move formally abolishes the death penalty in the UK.

      Fool. Stop regurgitating this silly rumour

    4. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by thesadmac · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that treason was still a crime pusnishable by death in England. I'd never heard the dockyard one before though.

    5. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the death penalty was abolished in December 1969, this was only for murder, the death penalty still remained in force on the statute book for 3 offences, Treason, Piracy and Burning Down the Royal Dock Yards, though the last execution for these particular offences was in 1942 for Treason and resulted in the execution of a soldier.

      On 27 January 1999, the UK Home Secretary (The Labour MP Jack Straw) signed the 6th protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights in Strasbourg. This move formally abolishes the death penalty in the UK.

      CHECK YOUR FACTS!!!!

    6. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      Actually, no it doesn't, because it has yet to be proven to be legally binding.

      Please check YOUR facts!

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    7. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by thesadmac · · Score: 1

      Well that's why I said "I was under the impression", rather than "this is the case".

    8. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      That and a slight geographical inconvenience.

    9. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The web has this to say about it: "When the death penalty was abolished in December 1969, this was only for murder, the death penalty still remained in force on the statute book for 3 offences, Treason, Piracy and Burning Down the Royal Dock Yards, though the last execution for these particular offences was in 1942 for Treason and resulted in the execution of a soldier. But later, goes on to say (?) "In practice the death penalty was suspended for all crimes in 1969, but formally the death penalty came to an end in the 1990,s after much discussion within the Home Office and with the UK being a member of the EU, this brought the Death Penalty to a final end. " So what's the real story? (source http://www.policestop.org.uk/death_penalty.html)

    10. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nevermind that its not in europe you dolt.

    11. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      Well, that, and they're not part of Europe.

    12. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Yonder+Way · · Score: 0

      You say that as if the U.S. would want to join the EU for some reason.

      The EU is a political case of Penis Envy, in which the member states of the EU wish to have an economy on the scale of the US but I'm afraid you quite missed out on many of the things that make us a great nation.

    13. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Keep whistling that tune until you're keelhauled and your copies of Photoshop and Windows XP are thrown over the gunwales.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    14. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by benwb · · Score: 5, Funny

      The us has about as much chance of agreeing to join the european union as france has of seceding from europe and becoming the 51st state.

    15. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Sadly, in 1998, the UK abolished the death penalty for all offences. I suppose this is a good thing (I'm anti-death-penalty), but I don't mind treasoners hanging from the rafters. Oh well.

      --Dan

    16. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      I thought the reason was that since we couldn't even figure out how to use the metric system, we had no hope of figuring out the euro.. :)

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    17. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by BorgDrone · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'm afraid you quite missed out on many of the things that make us a great nation.

      To what things are you referring ? The lack of freedom in the US ? The fact that the US is run by corporations instead of by representatives of the people ?
      I actually can't think of anything that makes the US 'better' than europe. I as a european can't think of a single thing in which I envy US-ians.

    18. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      The death penalty for all remaining offences was abolished in the 1998 Crime adn Disorder Act

    19. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "There is no death penalty in any state of the European Union. We are civilized people here."

      You sound like pure Eurotrash.

      Very few death sentences are actually carried out in the US. From 1930 - 1999, it averaged about 60/year.

      The US population consists largely of people who escaped from European monarchies and dictatorships. Joining the EU is low priority and would necessitate changing the name to "American/European Union".

      God bless the Atlantic!

    20. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by multriha · · Score: 1
      Let me get this argument straight,


      the US is civilized because they don't do that morally wrong and uncivilized thing very often?

    21. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What - you want a test case?

      Freak

    22. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      We are civilized because we only do it when society deems it necessary.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    23. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civilised people don't do it all

    24. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by syrinx · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      And here I thought it was because the US is *not in Europe*.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    25. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The fact that the US is run by corporations instead of by representatives of the people ?"

      As opposed to Europe being run by politicians and being offten used in US press as an example of corruped society ?

      Anyway, I used to live in Europe (Germany) and , since coming to US in 1994, I can clearly understand the difference.
      You are not free - you just think you are.

    26. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      I thought the reason the US couldn't join the European Union was, like, it's in Europe.

      Oh yeah, and if the US switched it's currency to the Euro, what would they use to prop up the Euro?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    27. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      I would have thought that the fact that a country is not in Europe would have some bearing on their eligibility. Or is this some sort of 'virtual' Europe of which you speak?

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
    28. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      except for all of those deaths involving legally held firearms, of course

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    29. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to Europe being run by politicians

      I know this must be an entirely new concept for an american, but here politics usually are performed by politicians, and while they may not necessarily be the best people for the job, at least those politicians are chosen by the people, whereas US politicians are bought by large corporations.

      and being offten used in US press as an example of corruped society ?

      Define "corruption", you mean something like the oil industry sponsoring the campaign for a presidential candidate and that same candidate giving the oil industry a huge tax cut when he gets elected ? purely coincidental offcourse.

    30. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      Which are commited either by criminals or in self defense against said criminals. Then again there are all those deaths involving legally held baseball bats and other blunt objects. I guess we should outlaw those to.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    31. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      Dont you mean 52nd? I think 51st is already taken.

      --
      .
    32. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      I would think GEOGRAPHY would be another, more major reason.

    33. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      If you add up the pluses and minuses of our society, 60 fried scumbags/year hardly makes us uncivilized.

      The death penalty was reenacted in this country by democratic process. Apparently, there are many people who do not share your opinion that capital punishment is immoral.

    34. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England certainly still has the death penalty for this (along with treason and one other I cannot remember).. does this mean we are going to start seeing people hang again? ;)

      As previous replies deny your claim, death sentence has been abolished from England. (Hello! Wake up!)

      On the other hand, Japan still practices capital punishment by hanging. Many responsible for the Aum Shinrikyo sarin attacks in 1994, 1995 were sentenced to death by hanging.

    35. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      "Dont you mean 52nd? I think 51st is already taken."

      Yes, by the UK.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    36. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by superyooser · · Score: 1
      "Yes, you must execute anyone who murders another person, for to kill a person is to kill a living being made in God's image."

      - God

    37. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      51, france... oh PLEEZE! Canada and the UK are way in front of them in line. France would be lucky to have america TAKE them, and even then they would be in the 60's and probably not allowed to vote. Because everyone knows you want a screwed up goverment and economy you look towards france.

    38. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by SkulkCU · · Score: 2


      At this point, that's more likely to happen than the UK joining the EU...

      --
      .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
    39. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes why can't we give rapist, child molesters, and murders a slap on the wrist and integrate them back into our neighborhood.
      They could get rid of all those pesky kids, virgins, and the guy next door who keeps telepatically taunting me sending me signals oh God it's got to be silenced!

    40. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by mpe · · Score: 2

      There is no death penalty in any state of the European Union. We are civilized people here. That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      Not that the US would probably want to.
      Of more direct relevence is that this no death penalty clause trumps any extradition treaties EU members might have with any other nations. If someone may face execution they cannot be extradited. The US is in the same catagory as any other nation which allows execution here.

    41. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      51, france... oh PLEEZE! Canada and the UK are way in front of them in line.

      As is Australia. Though of course the head of the line is with Israel, assuming they don't claim to be state number 1 and want to bump the rest up...

    42. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or the legally held firearms in unsecured places which are found by the children of the house. Or used against friends or lovers in fits of rage.

    43. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that it's more civilized to lock a person up, stuck with the same four walls for however many decades it takes for them to finish their natural lives in such an unnatural environment?

      Forget the "who's going to pay for it?" question, that in and of itself seems more "cruel and unusual" than simply ending their life.

  4. Time For Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you see that it's time for revolution? REAL revolution - the overthrow of the corporate regime that is raping and opressing the world.

    Get rid of this government system that is owned by corporate billionaires.

    Get rid of the top down hierachies that rule all industry and work places. Equal say for all!

    1. Re:Time For Revolution by nege · · Score: 1

      I guess that could have been a joke, but just in case it wasnt...
      I am kind of tired of people just getting on a box and shouting down our government and corporate evils and not offering up a fricking solution. If you have a better idea on how to run this country, please offer it up. If not, people will not be taking you seriously when you shout generalized, subjective opinions in ANY forum. (And then you get made fun of in every medium from "something awful" to Saturday Night Live.

    2. Re:Time For Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get rid of all "Nations", and live in autonomous communities.

    3. Re:Time For Revolution by nege · · Score: 1

      hahahaah! you think that would work?? No nations...no government. What you are suggesting is really a step backward. Sorry, no more computers without your corporations and nations. No advancement in technology either. Its proven democracy allows for the level of consumarism needed to generate money and jobs which lead to advances in science and technology. If you want proof just look at any nation besides a democratic one. USSR? Dont think so. Dont count on China either, they havent been to the moon right (or a host of other things we've done) And what about leadership in your little communities. How would that work? Again, you just suggest an idealistic view without a real solution.

    4. Re:Time For Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "consumarism" is what is killing this very earth. The throw away, use once and destroy mentality. You think you live in a democracy??? hahahahahah. More like an economic dictatorship!

    5. Re:Time For Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should check out the Zapatista movement in Chiapas, Mexico.

      You dumbass, ignorant, headupyourass, yankee capitalist piece of shit.

    6. Re:Time For Revolution by nege · · Score: 1

      hmmm both posts from AC...sounds about right to me. Your insults truly betray your cause.

  5. i say aaaar ! all the time but I aint a pirate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people like this sound, especially the one who has cooked the great dinner. why is it associated with pirates, can anyone tell.
    and where can i get my hands on those malaysian cd's.

    aaar!

    1. Re:i say aaaar ! all the time but I aint a pirate by chamenos · · Score: 1

      you can only get your hands on them if you're in the vincinity.....like in thailand, indonesia, singapore, etc. your best bet is still warez if you're not living in any of the above :)

  6. ARRRRRRRR, matie!! by spoonist · · Score: 1

    Arrrr... Shiver me CD burners!

    1. Re:ARRRRRRRR, matie!! by handsomepete · · Score: 2, Funny

      ArrrrMS says information *wants* to be free!

    2. Re:ARRRRRRRR, matie!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrrr, ArrrMS is a blowhard, matie!

      I'd rather be listenin' to ESArrrrr!

      He be makin' some sense wit his cathedral and the bazaaaaaaaaarr!

      (Help me. I can't stop saying 'arr'. Damn you, Admiral Taco, damn you to hell!)

  7. Who to blame? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Years calling them "software pirates", in some moment they will be confused enough to need to be real pirates after all.

  8. you lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or, as you would probably spell it, U loose

  9. Cheaper by the million by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why bother with small scale copying at all? Instead of trying to impose non-working copy-protection on consumer hardware, the media industry should focus on large scale copying.


    If I was trying to make money in IP violations, this is how I would do it:

    1) Forge documents from media companies, ordering large batches of CDs and DVDs from established manufacturers.

    2) Sell those records to wholesalers, which might or might not be aware of the scam.

    3) Profit

    1. Re:Cheaper by the million by suss · · Score: 2

      3) Profit
      4) Prison

    2. Re:Cheaper by the million by ShoeHead · · Score: 1

      Woah. So that's what step 2 is. Everyone else guards it like a trade secret.

      It's all starting to make sense now.

    3. Re:Cheaper by the million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot
      step 1.5 Somehow intercept the shipment of the cd's that would most definatly be sent to the media companys usual shipping address as most companys dont send orders to whatever address comes in on the PO unless its been previuosly cleared

    4. Re:Cheaper by the million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      step 2.5 Somehow embezel the money from the media company as most wholesalers pay on net 30 or even net 60 and they usually dont pay by cash to whoever drops the cds off at t he door.

    5. Re:Cheaper by the million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.

      1) Pirate recent bits of software and video games, removing annoying copy protection.

      2) Sell them to wholesalers for slightly more than the original cost.

      3) Anonymously donate the original cost to the companies whose product is being "pirated"

      4) Notice how sales through these vendors skyrocket since customers are happy with bug-free, non-annoyance-protected products.

      5) Profit.

      HAR!

    6. Re:Cheaper by the million by jcknox · · Score: 1

      So, did this guy just violate the DMCA?

  10. +1 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the punchline to one of the funniest jokes around.

    Arr!

  11. Why use a boat.. by Perdo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you can do the same thing at your desk?

    Someone tell those guys not to take the term "Pirate" litterally.

    "Suck Emma, suck. 'Blow' is just a figure of speech!"

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Why use a boat.. by lpontiac · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      "Suck Emma, suck. 'Blow' is just a figure of speech!"

      Hrm, who's Emma? :)

  12. good grief by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

    Heh, I guess pirate was correct after all.

    If there is money to be made, crooks will invent new ways to make it.

    Shiver me timbers, mates! Need two million copies of Brittany Spears today, or there will be no rum for you, scallywags!

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  13. Pirates on a ship by Imois · · Score: 1, Funny

    How appropriate!

  14. ITYM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    1) Forge documents from media companies, ordering large batches of CDs and DVDs from established manufacturers.

    2) ????

    3) Profit

    1. Re:ITYM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      loser he filled in number 2

      sell to stores that are cluless

      finally this is what is just what is being done with some bootlegs and secondhand music stores are a great place to do it.

  15. But... by tsa · · Score: 2

    I always learnt that on a ship the laws of the country the ship sails under apply. If that's true what's the problem?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything can float in international waters. It doesn't need to be registered or have a flag.

    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that Liberia is going to care much about things like this. In fact, countries like Liberia make quite a bit of money looking the other way where it's registered ships are concerned.

  16. Maybe they should start a pirate radio station by Goonie · · Score: 1
    to advertise their pirate CD operation.

    I have a 45 of "Knights of the Black Forest" if anyone needs one .... ;)

    Instant Karma to anyone who gets the reference

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Maybe they should start a pirate radio station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was "a walk through the black forest"

      Nice reference btw, I had already thought of it :)

      Next up, pirate post office services!

  17. What I found to be funny... by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...was that the page with the news article featured links right to where you could purchase the CD ROMs and RW's, plus the software to burn the CDs.
    Which basically means anyone can just follow the provided links to buy all the sh-t (except the boat) that will enable them to jump right into the offshore piracy business!

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:What I found to be funny... by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if you want to spend lots of time moored out in the sea, running your computer off a battery or generator, at threat from real pirates and so forth, be my guest.

      Count me out tho. :)

    2. Re:What I found to be funny... by MaxVlast · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's the real humor: What are the chances these guys will be gotten by real pirates? It's still a big problem in the southern Asian seas. "Arrrr, gimme all yer CD-Rs." "Aye matie, but we'rrrrre pirates too." "No ye arrrrrn't, yerrrrr just geeks. Well tanned geeks. Arrrrr."

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:What I found to be funny... by Flounder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked for a Pirate radio station in Tijuana a few years ago. Technically, they weren't illegal, they just had their station and transmitter about 150yds from the border in San Diego and blasted about 75,000 watts.

      They had a "subsidiary" that was stationed on a old oil drilling ship, that sat moored off outside in international waters off the coast of NYC, and broadcast at 60,000 watts. People there would work and live on the ship, only going ashore about once a month for supplies.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    4. Re:What I found to be funny... by MaxVlast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Further evidence that pirate jokes are among the funniest things in the world.

      Though they're CD-arrrrrrs. :-)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    5. Re:What I found to be funny... by Zara2 · · Score: 2
      What station was that? I just might have listened to it.

      Yea I know its off-topic but interesting too.

      --

      Pithy, yet ultimately meaningless, phrase expressed with gusto!

  18. Legal status of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this actually illegal? I assume it is...

  19. Solar Power? by remax · · Score: 1

    Generators? Somehow I don't think so.... unless they turn out a LOT of coasters!

    1. Re:Solar Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck do you think the navy's of the world operate electronics at sea? It isn't that difficult - it just costs a boatload (literally!)

      The only problem I see would be duplicating in rough water. Power is not an issue.

    2. Re:Solar Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duplicating should be np.
      bolt an injection molder to the deck.
      bolt a deposition chamber to the deck.
      press away.
      The real trouble is getting the things on the docks then to the consumer

  20. Legality ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting



    Even when they're NOT in international waters, the so-called "legality" is just as blurred.

    What's "piracy" anyway ?

    If RIAA wants to charge people an arm and a leg for trying out songs, and themselves (the RIAA) are known to NOT PAYING THE ROYALTIES to the artists, who's the REAL "pirate" ?

    What the so-called "CD-pirates" are doing is just this - they are doing one thing that got the MPAA, RIAA, BSA and whatever hopping mad, as mad as what the DCMA is doing to many of us.

    I am NOT saying what the "CD-pirates" are doing is right, but just that, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

    Period.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  21. Re:What caused this? by thesadmac · · Score: 1

    So if a bunch of guys were say, printing money and giving it out for a reduced cost, they should be allowed to get along with it inside the country instead of it being illegal? Instead of the poor sods having to hide away. Yeah, I see your point.

  22. Hilarious by ffatTony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Police in Penang last week launched "Operation Green Ribbon" to nab peddlers of illegal CDs and VCDs and Mazlan said they had already arrested four retailers and seized over 1,000 pirated copies.

    I went to Penang just recently and there were literally multi-floor malls selling professional copies of Oracle for $20, dvds for $2-5 (based upon quality), Adobe products, MS products, etc. It was so vast it was staggering. One guy took a duffel bag overflowing with dvds/software back with us.

    Basically what I'm getting at is if they've only found 1000 pirated copies, then they are either totally inept or not trying very hard.

    1. Re:Hilarious by merky1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They only nabbed those four because they were late on there "insurance" payments...

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    2. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      remember, this is the same as any "war". They are going to find a limited amount of anything (ie. drugs).

      "Some guy wen down to X and bought 200 pounds of pot."

      Newsflash: "Medicinal marijuana grower busted with 16 plants. An estimated 10oz's was taken of the streets. This marijuana would have gotten to a bunch of disabled people and AIDS patients. Glad that we saved the planet from these assholes!"

    3. Re:Hilarious by gotr00t · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, I agree that the law enforcement around the far east are doing a horrid job. Apparently, last time I went to China, there were literally entire floors of a mall covered with retailers of pirated CD's. Most of them were selling the exact same thing, hinting at a similar souce. Some of the packages were printed well, and had a good design to them, and most of the CDs were of poor quality, but were pressed, and not burned. There were also CD's that came in packages that looked like it came out of an inkjet printer, and the CD itself was a CD-R.

      Apparently, these operations can never really be stopped because while I was there, I literally saw police go and buy some copies of some VCD's (not seized, bought). These people just don't realize that their personal gain in purchasing and selling cheap software may be good for them in the short run, but disasterous to their nation in the long run.

    4. Re:Hilarious by MightyTribble · · Score: 1

      I went to the new mall in Malacca two years ago; same deal. Fake CDs as far as the eye could see, for open sale in the middle of the building.

      If all they got were four folks and 1,000 CD, then they weren't trying *at all*.

    5. Re:Hilarious by ponxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > but disasterous to their nation in the long run

      I'm not saying i agree with their methods, but how exactly is it going to be disastrous for China in the long run? No-one would buy this software there at full price as it's simply not affordable. With the pirated versions people gain knowledge and skills that can get them jobs everywhere in the world! And it advances Chinas computer industry, so until the US lays a boycot on them for lack of copy-right prevention it'll do nothing but good for the country, seeing it doesn't loose any profit itself

    6. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those four must've been the guys who were selling CDs on the sidewalk in front of the police station.

    7. Re:Hilarious by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Informative

      I live in Penang, and sometimes raids are advertised in the papers. You'll see headlines such as "Raid Next Week", and all the shops close on that day. Neat huh?

      There are surprise raids sometimes, but pirates somehow find out about it before hand, and all the shops close on that day. Some surprise.

      There really isn't any way to elimainate piracy in Asian countries when the price of licensed software is so high. In the States, $100 for a word processor may be affordable, but when it gets converted to Malaysian currency, it becomes 380 Malaysian ringgit. Considering the per capita income of most Malaysians to be around 1000 to 1500 Malaysian ringgit, it's considered pricy (and the fact that people can easily buy the pirated version for 7 ringgit doesn't help the situation either).

      To reduce piracy in these parts, software companies should price their software at prices that are affordable from a local point of view.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    8. Re:Hilarious by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Informative

      If all they got were four folks and 1,000 CD, then they weren't trying *at all*.

      I think it must have been a "show".

      I understand China performs a show whenever Western companies complain of copyright violations during critical negotiations of some sort, just round up and destroy a bunch of fake goods hoping that the West accept their claim that they are trying.

      It sounds to me like someone is making payoffs to prevent a *real* bust.

    9. Re:Hilarious by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      No-one would buy this software there at full price as it's simply not affordable. With the pirated versions people gain knowledge and skills that can get them jobs everywhere in the world!

      Exactly how did these people that can't afford software manage to find hardware to run it on? Did they steal it?

    10. Re:Hilarious by Xpilot · · Score: 2

      The hardware isn't cheap. In fact, it's more expensive here in Malaysia where I live than in the US. 1 USD is approximately 3.8 ringgit (Malaysian money). Now if a person has blown 3000 Malaysian ringgit in hardware (about 2 months salary for an average person here), he finds out he needs to spend about 1000 ringgit more for an operating system and an office suite. Then the ultra-cheap pirated versions are really tempting indeed, since one can get any kind of software for only about 7 ringgit apiece.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    11. Re:Hilarious by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      To reduce piracy in these parts, software companies should price their software at prices that are affordable from a local point of view.

      And of course as soon as they do that some bright person will buy a million or so copies for 7 riggit each, ship them to the US, sell them for $10 a pop and make a nearly $10 million. I'm sure that will help the software companies profit margins. There really isn't anything the companies can do to stop this sort of thing, that's just the way it is.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    12. Re:Hilarious by amorangi · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've lived in Hong Kong and Philippines and am staggered by the scale of the malls in each place. In Hong Kong they'd raid a mall every 3 months and nab a couple of 12 or 13 year olds (un-prosecutable), and report it on the main TV news that they'd done a crack-down. It always made me laugh. In fact it's HARD to get unpirated software. The inflight magazine on Bangkok Airlines actually gives advice in buying pirated software and DVDs (DVDs are often of inferior quality).

    13. Re:Hilarious by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Doesn't that mean Malaysian piracy efforts (selling Word for 7 ringgit) undermine Malaysian software development growth?

      Who in Malay would want to write and develop any software when you could steal it down the street for 7 ringgit?

      Isn't that reason enough for Malay to try to curb software piracy, in order to strengthen it's own IT industry? It's akin to the US trying to put tariffs on Japanese cars in order to make US cars more competitive. In this case, it would be Malay govt placing a 200% tax on non-native software, so that instead of 7 ringgit, it now costs 21 ringgit, with the extra income being funneled into software infrastructure and schools, or something.

    14. Re:Hilarious by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And of course as soon as they do that some bright person will buy a million or so copies for 7 riggit each, ship them to the US, sell them for $10 a pop and make a nearly $10 million.

      And that's one of the many reasons why things like Palladium are being developed - imagine region encoding on software. Except instead of a 2 or 3:1 price differential, we're talking 100 or 1000:1.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    15. Re:Hilarious by Xpilot · · Score: 2


      Who in Malay would want to write and develop any software when you could steal it down the street for 7 ringgit?


      The name of the country is Malaysia. Malay is the language and also the major ethnic race here.

      The answer to your question is : almost nobody. Retail software is practically non-existant. The only job programmers get here is developing custom or in-house software. It's a sad state of affairs, but that's the reality of the situation here.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    16. Re:Hilarious by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      If the software isn't in english it wouldn't sell very well :)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    17. Re:Hilarious by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of Vancouver BC... Seriously.

      I don't live there (I have some relatives that do), but last time I went up to Vancouver and down to Richmond - I saw several shops who were selling VCD's, and Audio cd's for about 8$ a pop. Most of these disks were professionally printed, but one has to seriously wonder about why they were so cheap.

    18. Re:Hilarious by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      To reduce piracy in these parts, software companies should price their software at prices that are affordable from a local point of view.
      Uh.. yeah, that's what software needs: region codes!
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    19. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Americans earned $350 yearly, that would not be hiliarious.
      You earn 100 times as much as the locals. So if MS sold XP for say, $20,000, thats the issue here, and explains the 'problem'.

      Some concessions to reality need to be made - some American University students pay $5, but this offer is AFAIK, not extended outside the US. Dual standards? Never mind the fact that many PC's are 'brand name hand me downs' where the MS tax has been already paid.

    20. Re:Hilarious by Bartmoss · · Score: 1

      Well the problem with that is that you end up either having a "grey" market of imports, or a region code type system. Somehow, that does not really strike me as being any better.

      Then again, who would WANT a malaysian-only (language) version of windows 2000 in the US? not too many I guess.

    21. Re:Hilarious by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2

      Legit VCDs can go for $8 CDN. Compare the low quality video (spanned across multiple discs) to a $20 DVD, it stacks up. I'm not going to claim that the copies those shops are selling are legit, though... :)

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    22. Re:Hilarious by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. Nation that doesn't produce software, nation that can buy CDs for $5 instead of importing the same thing from the US for $1000. How is this disastrous to their nation in the long run?

      Don't you know it's not even illegal in some countries? Is a kid in China earning $100/mth going to learn Oracle by using 3yrs of savings? I don't think so.

      US law != world law

    23. Re:Hilarious by mpe · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying i agree with their methods, but how exactly is it going to be disastrous for China in the long run? No-one would buy this software there at full price as it's simply not affordable. With the pirated versions people gain knowledge and skills that can get them jobs everywhere in the world!

      If anything it is more of a threat to open source in these Asian countries than a direct threat to the countries themselves.

      And it advances Chinas computer industry, so until the US lays a boycot on them for lack of copy-right prevention it'll do nothing but good for the country, seeing it doesn't loose any profit itself.

      Easy access to American software could advance China's computer industry rather less than not having such easy access. You could argue that simply cloning US products dosn't do much to advance any Chinese industry. Especially something so trivial to clone as software.

    24. Re:Hilarious by tialaramex · · Score: 1

      Building good distribution structures isn't disastrous. Setting expectations correctly (you buy software? For this price, I don't think you get support. Want some support? Pay for it) isn't disastrous.

      The people who aren't thinking long term are the information hoarders. They imagine that they are creating wealth, but it's a spreadsheet illusion, just like Enron. Still Enron got their share of co-operation from the US government, and so do Bill and the Mouse. Illusory wealth is as good as the real thing so long as you don't try to spend it.

      Real wealth is locked up in people. Copyright is a fools bargain unless you have more information than other people. When the US was younger it did exactly what Malaysia does now, in America printed books were cheaper because the foreign authors weren't getting paid.

      So, on the one hand you can expect these nations to "grow out of it" if they are permitted an even standing in the market. On the other hand it's a bad deal for everyone anyway. Simple mental arithmetic is enough to tell us that charging for infinitely reproducible copies isn't a sustainable policy. With or without "pirates" the analogue age is over.

    25. Re:Hilarious by eechuah · · Score: 1

      True, but not THAT many people use made in software nowadays. The VAST majority use Microsoft, Oracle, etc.

      Non widely used software is much more likely to be developed by Malaysian programmers (ie. say, a palm pilot program, etc.) and is MUCH harder to find pirated (because demand is much lower).

      So, I would say that piracy doesn't affect the local industry too much, because they couldn't compete with Microsoft and Adobe anyways. Heck, even the US IT industry can't come up with a company that can compete with Microsoft!!

    26. Re:Hilarious by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      LOL, well, 'compete' doesn't mean 'beat'!

      We've got Apple (OS, software), we've got Corel (Office productivity), we've got Blizzard (video games), we've got Palm (PDAs), we've got ID software (3d graphics APIs), etc.

  23. Yeah, because singing is just like money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you think that a song can be "owned" like a fork or a towel? I am certainly not stealing when I sing in the shower, no matter how close my voice sounds to Mariah Carey's (I'm a Unix-loving eunuch). To even compare counterfeiting with the reproduction of music says a lot more about what kind of things you consider naturally right.

    1. Re:Yeah, because singing is just like money by MaxVlast · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I get my towels from a towel licensing firm. I'm only allowed to use them for a restricted set of purposes, but I get the benefit of regular maintenance updates and, um, patches.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  24. And all together now... by Atsjoo · · Score: 1

    A pirate I was meant to beeee Trim the sails and roam the C... D...

  25. piracy by karouser · · Score: 1

    Well it's time to get out the guns and cutlasses and ....., no, realy I think that if as much effort was put into fixing the problem then there would be no problem. WELL MISter CHRIStian off the 'foresail, clear the poop deck, and make way for proffits.

    --
    Cut! Slash! Hack!
  26. Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an example of an unreasoned, apocalyptic extremism that plays into the hands of the forces the poster so adamantly attacks.

    Playing word games with "piracy" is pointless. Producing unauthorized duplicates of commercial products is known as counterfeiting. Most countries have laws prohibiting the creation and distribution of counterfeit goods. It's as illegal to market a counterfeit CD of the current flavor-of-the-week pop band as it is to sell fake Rolex watches.

    By glibly saying "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", all you've done is made more enemies: You have aligned yourself with counterfeiters, a tactic unlikely to draw support from the mainstream public.

    The enemies of your new friend are now your enemies.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      "Producing unauthorized duplicates of commercial products is known as counterfeiting"

      and forcing prices to be artificially high is known as "Price Fixing".

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> ...forcing prices to be artificially high is known as "Price Fixing.

      So what? Pointing to high CD prices won't legalize counterfeiting.

      This debate is not about the ability of college students to buy and copy music and movies as they see fit. The debate is about changing U.S. copyright law to ensure the interests of the public are addressed, rather than skewed in the interests of corporations with a lock on music distribution.

      If you seriously want to change the status quo, get to work. Otherwise, understand that unthinking assertions do more harm than good.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    3. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you this, though. If the prices of CDs went down to reflect the drop in costs of manufacturing the CDs, would many people be less inclined to use KaZaa or whatever to pirate them?

      I mean, CDs should cost a lot less then they do. If they cost consumers less, there would probably be more sales. And therefore, with more sales, you have less people that need to pirate the songs.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Golias · · Score: 1
      If the prices of CDs went down to reflect the drop in costs of manufacturing the CDs, would many people be less inclined to use KaZaa or whatever to pirate them?

      No.

      Next question.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by siriuskao · · Score: 0

      People want stuff to be FREE, so unless CD cost $0, people will still pirate... As for that "TRY BEFORE YOU BUY" thing, most of the song downloaded for "TRY" purposes either end up on a cd "backup" or hd for couple of month. CAN'T AFFORD? => DON'T BUY => Price go down if no one buys

    6. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only counterfeiting if you claim they're official products from that manufacturer. Making fake Rolex watches and calling them 'Polex' watches wouldn't be counterfeiting, just as copying, say, a Warner Bros DVD onto an unlabelled DVD and selling it, or copying a Windows CD onto a CD-R and selling it wouldn't be counterfeiting.

    7. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Need to pirate the songs? It's not a friggin' dialysis machine - it's a CD. You don't need the latest CD. You might want it, but you don't need it. If I want to make a CD called "Fingernails down a blackboard" and sell copies for $500 each, that still doesn't entitle you to make copies of it & give them away or sell them for what they're "worth". I don't want to pay $10,000 for a wide-screen plasma TV. Does that mean I can justify stealing one because it costs too much? How about the latest P IV or Athlon which probably costs $400 or more right now - we all know it'll be under $100 in a year or so. If Intel & AMD won't sell it for the $0.02 worth of raw materials it took to make it, are we morally & legally justified in stealing it?

    8. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rather a broad judgement don't you think?

      Of course SOME people will always pirate stuff to get it for free, but there IS a magic number when it comes to buying things where people will just buy an original rather than deal with the hassle of getting it "for free".

      Take a real-life example that actually happened a week ago to a friend of mine:

      She found some local electronics store that was selling a new CD she wanted for $5 on a short promotional special. Rather than deal with the hassle of trying to get all the tracks on kazaa, etc. She just dropped $5 and has a nice original CD.

      If the CD was $15, she probably would've downloaded it.

      Myself, I have all of the tools I need at home to duplicate DVDs (region-free DVD-ROM, software utilities, and a DVD-R drive).

      I don't - the reason being the price of DVDs, which is usually reasonable value for the money. Why should I spend hours of time and effort ripping/re-encoding a DVD to make a copy when I can just throw down a $20 and have an original?

      My time and effort is worth more than the cost of the DVD, so I just buy it.

      So there we have it - at some magical price-point, people WILL buy stuff, if for no other reason than the amount of work it entails to get it elsewhere (and having an original "anything" is nice too).

      I trust I need not even comment on software companies like Adobe or Microsoft that sell their products in the hundreds or thousands of dollars, then whine about piracy...

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    9. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't "need" to steal anything, especially something as unimportant as popular music.

      The price of a product has nothing to do with your own sense of ethics. If you aren't personally ashamed to be a thief, well, I guess you'll steal something.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    10. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by kableh · · Score: 2

      You have aligned yourself with counterfeiters, a tactic unlikely to draw support from the mainstream public.

      Perhaps this is just my raging cynicism kicking in, but the past couple of years have given me the impression that the RIAA et. al. ALREADY view us all as a bunch of theives. Yes, the parent your comment replies to is a bit extreme, but with the hyperbole Hilary Valenti spouts on a daily basis it is justified in my mind.

    11. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by kableh · · Score: 2

      Thanks for making a gross generalization, and answering a valid question on behalf of all of us consumers.

      Asshole.

    12. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Thank you for entirely ignoring my point and focusing on a point of grammar. Should I have "want" instead of "need"? Probably. It doesn't negate my point that there are people who would be perfectly willing to buy music instead of pirate it through KaZaa or what have you if the prices of CD were lower.

      Oh, and I suspect that there are people who "need" to download music. Considering that there are "internet addicts", "e-mail addicts", "Everquest addicts", and so on, I'd imagine there are people out there who feel a psychological pressure to continue downloading as many songs as they can get through P2P services.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    13. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Well, yes, that's right. The RIAA does think you're all a bunch of thieves.

      Hyperbole is not justified. Hyperbole just strengthens the impression that people are simply trying to justify theft, rather than addressing the legitimate copyright and property issues that have surfaced via all this P2P noise.

      This is a political and legal debate. It will be decided by votes in Congress and rulings from the Supreme Court.

      Most of the U.S. public doesn't buy music often enough to care. Why should they care if it is legal for you to copy a track of music by some bar band that got a record deal? Talk to them about the price of food, electricty and health care and they might start paying attention.

      Pick your fight. If you think copyright law needs to change, go for it. If you think CD prices are too high, stop buying CD's.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    14. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems quite reasoned. Folks that feel RIAA is screwing us with what should be illegal price fixing and wink-wink-nod trusts. Government is set up such that votes and candidates may be bought. Legal recourse in courts and through legislative action do nothing because of the economic differences in the lobbying effort.

      So it's no surprise that someone, like you (as an example, not being derogatory), who believes in that system is upset that someone doesn't buy into it. Well, the whole reason is that they do NOT believe that system represents them. So what is legal and what is not legal makes little difference to them, because the parity and fairness of the system is in question. Why play the game of governorance if the rules are slanted?

      So you go to alternative means. Clearly, you don't like them, but the reality is, they are there and used frequently. This not a matter of court of public opinion; that has been left behind. After all, voting is a matter of public opinion, and less than half of the available voters do vote on an election by election comparison in most parts of the US.

      This issue is fairly getting what you think you have paid for. If the person is a taxpayer, at least in the US, that means much of his money has gone to support companies he strives against via enforcement laws.

      Put another way, you believe the governorance of law is the rightful end all of political action. There are those that do not, of varying temperments.

      Put yet another way, this is like game theory. You can have a very valued and preferred choice lose out because of the political process. This puts question in the validity of that process and those that represent it. It becomes an entirely valid, but not legal, reason to distrust and disapprove of the rules of that system.

      Adjacently, this is why some people just don't vote. It's not necessarily apathy or lack of time. After all, they feel if the government officials cared, they would have listened to practical proposals for longer voting times over multiple days. Doesn't and won't happen.

      Also, it's not that such "apathetic" folks do not understand someone else decides for them when they do not cast a vote. They don't vote because they believe the responsibility of voting dilutes their non-vote. It's totally counter-intuitive to you, but they believe a government that is put into valid office by less than 50% of the available voting population is simply not valid. Legally, of course, they are wrong. Ethically, it is dubious whether that leads to vindication of criminal activity. But from a sense, it also means the person in office does not represent their interests.

      In a sense, it's also a failure of representative democracy--compare to a plain democracy and you'll hopefully understand the difference.

      It's easy to say that someone who supports piracy aligns themselves with counterfeiters. Less you forget, our politicians do this regularly and legally. On the basis of raw principal, both pirater and politican are doing the exact same thing. What matters now isn't the process--that's been invalidated and lost. Frankly, this boils down to not getting caught and minimizing losses because THAT IS WHAT IS LEFT TO THEM IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.

    15. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You too are ignoring my point in favour of a particularly useless ramble over a point of grammar. Yes, I probably should have said "want" instead of "need".

      Big deal.

      Here's a big difference between going out and stealing that $10,000 TV and downloading a song. With the TV there is a tangible item. It is property. If you steal it, that store has a loss to their inventory. If someone downloads a song or an entire CD from a P2P service, no store has lost that CD or that song. They still have the same inventory as before, but perhaps (and this is the important part) only have lost one customer. Businesses exist to make money. I'm not going to argue that. Most businesses that don't make money don't stick around for long, government subsidized ones notwithstanding. But the business (in this case a music store) did not lose any merchandise. Someone can still come in and buy that CD.

      And how much does one song on a CD weigh? I can weigh the TV. How much is it worth? I can price TV's individually. It is worth more if it's a Top 40 hit? Some TVs are more expensive then others. How about if it's been the #1 song for 12 weeks running? What if it's a "B side" song? And some TV's are less expensive. It depends on the brand.

      Your arguement holds little merit.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    16. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more counterfeiting, the more useless the real thing becomes. Furthermore, the more money becomes necessary to stop the trade.

      While public opinion may be driven in favor of the copyright industry, which I point out you have NOT proven, the fact is that counterfeiting dilutes the value of the originals. If it didn't, the copyright industry wouldn't be squirming after pirates so much.

      While not legal and not ethical, it still remains an excellent way to get what you want through a system, while legal, you believe is corrupt. You don't like it, I don't really myself, but it's done and does work at times--you push and push so the other side responds harder and harder that it draws attention to the issue--something that wasn't really there 10 years ago.

    17. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ummm...choosing the wrong word isn't a mistake of grammar.

      Sure, the price of CD's is too high. And, sure, that's an incentive to get it elsewhere. People are still buying them, though. Someone paid cash for that CD they're "sharing".

      The best way to force CD prices to drop is to stop buying CD's at those prices. Start putting some stores out of business.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    18. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Golias · · Score: 1

      Humor: It's a concept. Look it up sometime during your next kernel re-compile.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely agree.

      Not to mention the unavailable titles ranging from kid's works to foreign films. I've been waiting for 2 years for Karakter ('98 Emmy winner foreign film I believe) to come out on DVD in the US. Saw it on Bravo, liked it, wanted a copy. There appears to be a legit Region 2 copy. And of questionably legality Region 0s on ebay can be found. There is a VHS of it available in the US. And you can presumably download it (not that popular but not that unknown either).

      But for someone wanting a legal DVD of it, I'm shit out of luck. It would be easy for me to buy a firmware break for my DVD-ROM drive and try to get a region 2. Or get the region 0.

      What I'll probably end up doing is buying the VHS and a VCR (yeah, I don't own one) and digitize it for my own personal use, but I frankly find it stupid to be waiting on it. And if the MPAA has it's way, even encoding the VHS copy will become difficult due to hardware and media restrictions.

      Anyways, Babylon 5 was in the same boat, but I learned they are releasing season 1 on DVD now.

      It's almost as stupid as what I heard about Buffy episodes--something about them being like 2 years ahead in the season releases in Europe or something. Now, I heard the US releases have quite a bit value added material to the DVD sets and at least fans know they'll get released. And there's probably some release rights in there. But it's really a baffling situation.

    20. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 2

      >> it's no surprise that someone, like you...is upset...

      I'm not upset, just amused that so many people think that pop music and the RIAA is so bloody important that they elevate the issue to this level.

      Besides, you don't have a bloody clue about what I may or may not believe, or whether I support or don't support the "system".

      >> Government is set up such that votes and candidates may be bought. Legal recourse in courts and through legislative action do nothing because of the economic differences in the lobbying effort.

      If you believe that's true, then why aren't you buying votes and lobbying? Why hasn't the P2P community managed to organize?

      >>..You can have a very valued and preferred choice lose out because of the political process. This puts question in the validity of that process and those that represent it

      No, it doesn't put the validity of the process into question. It simply means you lost. You may value and prefer your choice, but others may not. At times, my success is dependent on your failure. Alleging that the process has failed because you didn't get what you want means only that you failed you to get what you wanted from the process. From others' perspective, the process may have succeeded quiet nicely.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    21. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
      Why should I spend hours of time and effort ripping/re-encoding a DVD to make a copy when I can just throw down a $20 and have an original?

      Yes, this is true for now and believe it or not the **AA actually knows this.
      The real reason they are running so scared is they realize that as technology advances and copying/downloading becomes easier and easier that magic price point gets lower and lower.
      Ten years from now, imagine yourself saying 'why should i spend 15 minutes copying a dvd when i can just buy one for [magic-number]?' and what number will that be? 50 cents? 25? 10?

      At some point in the future, covering production costs will always be higher than acquisition costs for the consumer.
      I'm looking forward to having this revolutionize the entertainment industry (read: distribution is no longer the major cash cow), but to play devil's advocate: for the congolomerates to start searching for a price point that can't exist, well it's guaranteed to be a losing battle - the most they could do is just prolong it for a couple of years.

    22. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      My *point* as Gnovos pointed out below, is that organizations like
      the RIAA have no right to be bitching about criminal copying when they
      are engaged in criminal behavior themselves.

      Pot. Kettle. Black.

      AFAIC the same thing applies to Microsoft....

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    23. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Probably not, but so what? Is that going to change anything, or make the RIAA less powerful?

      All that's happening with most /. posts about this issue is a bunch of pontificating about morality, as if that will have any affect on anyone who can actually improve the state of affairs.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    24. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by aminorex · · Score: 2

      Said counterfeiters are in fact commiting massive
      acts of civil disobedience. Whether they are doing
      so from personal pecuniary interests or in an act
      of noble self-sacrifice is immaterial. The fact
      remains that they are *doing* something about the
      rape and subdivision of the Intellectual Commons.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  27. some comment on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No, pirates used to board ships and (without any violence) make copies of any original manuscripts they found aboard, then sail off with their booty to the nearest printing press to sell copies in every port. The sea-bound authors, realizing they wouldn't have exclusive access to their works any more, would then kill themselves. Pirates killing people is a just a myth"

    Found it in my quotes file, accidentally lost the poster name. Sorry.

  28. Picking Battles by gorjusborg · · Score: 1

    This is just one way to try to circumvent 'authorities' from interfering with piracy. There are undoubtedly many, many more, most have probably not been thought of yet, due to the lack of necessity. But, doesn't it seem that the the groups that are making such a big deal about piracy are spreading themselves too thin? The fact that they are chasing down individual users (see RAII v. Verizon) along with the big-time pirates just means that they cannot really concentrate on either. It seems to me that trying to stop the individual user and the pirate only means they will fail (in general) at doing either. (Of course, going after the individual user is most likely a scare tactic to stop the faint of heart users from copying.)

    --
    If it's not one thing, it's Steve's Mother
  29. Why not USA : EU :: Russia : NATO? by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a slight geographical inconvenience [prohibits the USA from joining the EU]

    Even if all EU members must claim territory that geographically belongs to Europe, then why not "admit" the USA to the EU in much the same manner as Russia has been "admitted" to NATO?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Why not USA : EU :: Russia : NATO? by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Isn't NATO the "North Atlantic Treaty Organization?" From what I can tell on the map, Russia has every bit as much of a claim to be on the North Atlantic as does, say, Turkey.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Why not USA : EU :: Russia : NATO? by plasm4 · · Score: 0

      and when was Russia admitted to NATO.. I think you have NATO confused with UN

    3. Re:Why not USA : EU :: Russia : NATO? by Omerna · · Score: 1

      Because the EU doesn't really want the US in it. They were created to create another economic superpower to compete with the US economically. If the US is in the EU that kinda kills the fun for them.

      --


      No sig for you.
    4. Re:Why not USA : EU :: Russia : NATO? by mpe · · Score: 2


      Isn't NATO the "North Atlantic Treaty Organization?" From what I can tell on the map, Russia has every bit as much of a claim to be on the North Atlantic as does, say, Turkey.

      Depending exactly where you draw the boundries on bodies of water Russia probably has a stronger claim than Turkey.

  30. And I thought I'd be original... by Flounder · · Score: 1, Redundant

    with some lame "Arrrr, mateys. Ye shall be giving us your booty of blank CD-Rs."

    Be original, or be different. It doesn't matter.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  31. International Waters == Anarchy? by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
    It gets pretty weird, doesn't it. What's to stop the RIAA from influencing the USG to send ships to sink or confescate the vessels? You'd probably be safer in the territorial waters of a state that won't enforce. They would certainly raise a diplomatic stink if another country came to enforce without permission.

    Just another stake in the heart of "the architecture of control". I'm not about to support this sort of thing either in principle or through buying pirated CDs, but it does demonstrate the weakness of the RIAA position. If you treat your customers with respect, they won't disapoint you. Let those who won't pay even what it is worth to them worry about their own karma.

    1. Re:International Waters == Anarchy? by mpe · · Score: 2

      What's to stop the RIAA from influencing the USG to send ships to sink or confescate the vessels?

      That is known as "piracy" the real kind, not the more modern definition of copyright infringement. The RIAA does not want to get into "piracy upon the high seas".

    2. Re:International Waters == Anarchy? by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
      I don't think so. The US Navy or Coast Guard is able to operate on the high seas, although it may need some congressional support to do it legally. Applying international law implies that the damaged party is claiming protection of another state, which probably isn't the case here.

      I think there is an international law of the sea, but it probably doesn't keep nations from enforcing their own laws. Maybe someone who knows can comment.

  32. Freedonia by yerricde · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe that a vessel in internation waters is subject to the laws of its flag country -- the country in which the vessel is registered.

    Then register pirate ships in Freedonia, whose flag (called "Jolly Roger") is a white skull and crossbones on a black field.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  33. Yo ho ho.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We got fifteen discs on a dead exec's chest..
    Yo ho ho and a bottle o' cap'n.

    Arr, ye scaliwags. Be handin' over yer wenches and yer discs, or we'll be sendin ye to Laaaaars Ulrich's locker.

    Hilary Rosen?

    Arrr. Ye can keep harrrr. We said wenches!

    Now I have another excuse to talk like a pirate. Bless you, you ingenious content thieves, bless you.

    But damn the media. Now I won't be able to release Pirate Linux without people being afraid to use it.

    And I was going to make everything display in pirate speech. :(

    "Shiver me timbers! Yarr kernel has been keel hauled!"

    1. Re:Yo ho ho.. by Knobby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pirate Linux sounds something like PorthOS.. PorthOS is something a few friends of mine and I kicked around whenever the alternative OS announcements on /. became boring or we felt like tormenting the IT guys on campus (/. DDOS).. Anyway, PorthOS was going to be the Anti-Linux. The heaviest, most feature laden, OS ever. Error messages would be passed through text-to-speech and yelled at you in Esperanto with a drunken-french accent..

      Someday it'll happen!

    2. Re:Yo ho ho.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until Mac os XI

    3. Re:Yo ho ho.. by Darkninja666 · · Score: 1

      You should really produce the "Error messages would be passed through text-to-speech and yelled at you in Esperanto with a drunken-french accent.. ". It would be a blast to install on a users windows computer.....

      --
      Secure multi-mediation is the future of all webbing...
  34. Funny, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It went way, way, way, over the boys heads here.

    1. Re:Funny, but by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Of course it really should have been "letters of marque and reprisal" :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  35. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hilary Rosen declared today that the RIAA would be offering letters of marque to aid in the hunting down and destruction of the Content Pirates of the South Pacific.

    When interviewed, Rosen stated, "We will not stand for this! The Crown will pay a thousand marks to any who bring in the heads of these scourges of the entertainment industry!"

    Several daring captains of the IT industry have joined forces with the RIAA, becoming privateers. However, not all recording artists agree with the actions of the RIAA.

    "I was there for the announcement. This one guy, he came up to me and said, "Arr, don't be worrying matey, I'll be sinkin' those music pirates! And then he pulled a flintlock on me and stole my watch!", said Lars Ulrich.

    The pirates in question could not be reached for comment.

  36. Im up for it by ehlo · · Score: 1

    Sounds like fun. I sure wouldnt mind steaking out on a pirate boat off of malaysia burning pr0n, catching a tan between cd's.. And im sure they have their share of rum & ..jezabels ;)

  37. The circle closes by wheany · · Score: 1

    The word "piracy" has returned to its roots...

  38. Makes sense... POVERTY is the bottomline by dennison_uy · · Score: 1

    It all makes sense.

    Taking piracy to the ocean can only strengthen the Malaysian pirate ring, the largest movie piracy ring IN THE WORLD as it will give them easier escape routes as well as quicker access to other countries where they export their pirated VCDs to.

    Wanna know why rampant piracy still exists in Malaysia despite the frequent mass raids that happen in that country? Because although the Malaysian government wants (whether sincerely or just for show) to combat piracy, the people that are under them do not. Why? Because the bribes those pirates give are their source of income.

    The bottomline here is POVERTY.

    While people are forced to find ways to feed themselves because of poverty, may it be legal or illegal, piracy, like many other crimes, cannot be stopped.

    --
    Take off every 'sig'!
    All your 'sig' are belong to us!
  39. Malaysia + piracy by sebol · · Score: 1
    Malaysia, piracy.. malaysia, piracy... The last time 'Malaysia' appeared on slashdot was About priracy too....

    is that any interested story about malaysia other than piracy? such as.. "Alex Yoong running wide during entering pit stop"

    --
    -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
  40. Doesn't make sense to me by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I'm no lawyer but, my understanding is that the copying is not what's illegal; it's the selling that's illegal.

    1. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

      ehm, well at least you are honest. If only the selling part was legal then me burning a copy of a cd for a friend who of course I do not charge would be legal. It isn't. You are not allowed to make copies of cd's. It is written on most of them. Only in some countries are you allowed to make backup's for strict personal use only, and even that is combatted left and right. (ever tried copying some games for backup?) I don't think that knocking of 10.000 copies could be considered for personal use even by the most rabid /.er

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  41. Devo said it best... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    I'm a big pirate and I like to steal.
    Ah ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

    Go speed racer.

  42. Arrrrrr... They have me BOOTY! by thenovacrisis · · Score: 1

    They aren't pirates until they get Eye-Patches and Peg-Legs. Though, I would buy an Eye-Patch just for fun.

    --

    -----.----.-------
    I'll .sig you!
  43. Yes, there is. by MightyTribble · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The UK has the death penalty for treason, arson in a naval dockyard (holdover from when ships were made of wood) and, I think, sheep rustling.

    I'm pretty sure that France still has the death penalty for treason, too.

  44. Re:What caused this? by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

    And then the incentive to make music would be........... what exactly?

  45. *Newsflash* by king_penguin_05 · · Score: 1

    The RIAA and the MPAA believe they have found a way to stop the pirates in their tracks. In a recent study they discovered that most people who pirate music and movies have legs. Therefore legs must be the reason these crimes occur. The right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution, but they have found nothing protecting these people from having their legs taken away. So in this post 9-11, post Columbine world, they must take away everyone's legs or the terrorists will have won, and then who will protect the children. (This is supposed to be a joke, but you never know about the RIAA.)

    --
    "I can't drive 55. It only goes 38."
  46. What about "SeaLand?" by BTWR · · Score: 1
    Remember Sealand?

    Slashdot did a story on them before. I know there has been talk of doing this before, so who is actually to stop them if the, er... offer is large enough?

  47. Be on the lookout by giminy · · Score: 2

    Be on the lookout for the ArrrrrIAA.

    Budum *crash*

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  48. It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, I live here, and since last thursday our time all the vcd (video) shops have been closed tight.

    As well, the street vendors are not at their usuall places.

    The computer cd shops have been open though..which is weird.

    This is typical here, every so often the shops close, they do a raid, the shops open.

  49. Treasure Island by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    To locate Pirate Ships:
    First, have have police watch reruns of
    "Treasure Island", to get the general idea of who, what they are looking for.
    Then, turn them loose, and on the way out, holler:
    "Remember, it's the ships with the "Jolly Roger" flag!".
    They may not catch any CD pirates this way, but the Oceans will be a LOT safer for the rest of us if they actually come across and catch any REAL pirates!

  50. Ladies and Gentlemen... by mtec · · Score: 1

    Today, as Chief of RIAA Weapons, I stand before you to present the latest tool in our fight against piracy. Better even than the kazaa spiders and the DRM encoded speaker wire. With a potential far greater than the prototype CD-embedded surveillance camera.

    I give you... RIAAquaSub.
    With 10 surplus MK.48 torpedos, 150 day sea endurance and tuned killer Bose sound system linked to an Apple iPod patch system - er... Lets concentrate on the MK.48s....

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  51. This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by shimmin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If the ships used are registered in some nation's maritime registry, then that nation's laws still apply onboard, so why not just do it ashore in that nation? If the ships used AREN'T registered, then they have no legal protection against the coast guards or navies of _any_ nation that cares to harass them.

    It made a lot more sense back in the 1950's and 60's when Norweigian oil platforms in the North Sea installed some truly overpowered AM rigs and broadcasted music the BBC wouldn't play into the UK. (Paid for by the record companies who wanted the advertising.) Then, they were doing something that was legal in Norway, but not in the UK, and benefitted from being close to the UK, so a Norweigian maritime installation made perfect sense.

    Here, the pirates are doing something that doesn't benefit from being done at sea, so why bother?

    1. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by passion · · Score: 4, Funny

      OK, then I'll register my ship with the principality of sealand, or maybe I'll launch a satellite, and form a moon base to make my copies.

      --
      - passion
    2. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      If the ships used are registered in some nation's maritime registry, then that nation's laws still apply onboard,

      Most international ships are registered in countries such as Panama or Aruba which not exactly intolerant of sleaze, as long as it brings them $$$.

      But about the original point; guess most people here don't realise how serious piracy is in South East Asia. The problem is not about piracy (or counterfeiting, if you prefer) per se, but about who is doing it. You see, the organised mafia is coming into the scene, leaving other relatively dangerous stuff such as human and drug trafficking.

      And boy, are they organised. There was this interview in Time (I think; too lazy to hunt the archive down) with a bigshot Hong Kong cop specialising in piracy busts. Apparently, this dude took part in a raid in Hong Kong and later went over to Malaysia to help the police there in a joint sting.

      The sting apparently went bad because the pirates (counterfeiters) recognised him from Hong Kong, leaving him with a dire warning about danger to his family.

    3. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by jesseraf · · Score: 1

      think spatial. the ship may be registered to a state which permits this type of activity, but may be around the world from where they need to distribute the CDs. Why would you produce the CDs in the Country X in the Caribbean, then ship to Country Y in Southeast Asia. Make sense to hike out into international waters in close proximity to where you're going to sell them. You'd assume would save time and money.

    4. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Aside from the "spatial" issue someone else mentioned, is the simple fact that it's hard to enforce laws on a ship that's in international waters, thousands of miles from its country of registration.

    5. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by mpe · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the ships used are registered in some nation's maritime registry, then that nation's laws still apply onboard, so why not just do it ashore in that nation?

      Maybe because they are a long way from their country of registration, have chosen to register with a country without a substantial navy and conduct their operations somewhere near a place which does not have good diplomatic relations with their country of registration.

    6. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      Hey, Passion, that moonbase thing might be a great idea! Or even better, maybe an orbiting space station. Seems I read a few years ago that damn near perfect ball bearings could be produced in a weightless environment, but as far as I know nobody has tried that with CDs. That's a cool project for NASA to look into! And if the RIAA could produce CDs like that, they'd probably be able to get a couple hundred bucks for them, so they'd be happy too (until the pirates can steal some spacecraft).

  52. Pirates, eh? by elemental23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: What do pirates use to copy movies?

    A: CD-Arrrr

    *ahem*

    --
    I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    1. Re:Pirates, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      elemental23,

      Please stop posting lame jokes and go back to licking assholes for money in the dark alleys of downtown. thank you

      AC

  53. Very, very good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have an agent?

  54. global economy, global crime by axxackall · · Score: 1
    It will take better international laws, better international police and better respect of international laws by ALL goverments to get such pirates, narko-business, terrorism and other internation crime nailed down. All == including US govt.

    Unfortunately - forget it for awhile. US goverment questioned: "What International Crime Court? There is no such thing if US soldgers do not have any immunity from it.". And then claimed: "I am the international law!". And actually proved it: "I was the International law for Afganistan. I am the International law for Iraq. I will be the International law for all evil nations."

    Unfortunately, that won't work. It did not work in Afganistan - the production of heroin and opium has been trippled compared to what it was with taliban. I doubt it will work with Iraq and Saudi. Bad example creates another bad example. Malasyan govt ecentually will give up. As Latin America govts gave up against narko-business. Why should they respect international laws if US does not?

    Fortunately, it won't last forever. Switching the attention of american people from economy problems to the war cannot last forever and creates even stronger internal economy problems. Sooner or later USA will be back in 1929 and the history will repeat itself. I hope, after all USA will have some internal law forcing their goverment to respect international laws. And actually improve it - if US disagree with UN they should suggest how to reform UN, instead of boykoting it (as it was before) or ignoring (as it is now).

    And only after that the war against CD pirates will bring any positive results.

    --

    Less is more !
  55. Pot, kettle, black. by TheLink · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What do you mean by "These people just don't realize that their personal gain in purchasing and selling cheap software may be good for them in the short run, but disasterous to their nation in the long run"

    It's not that stupid.

    Maybe you don't realize it but this sort of thing worked for the USA, it worked for Switzerland and I'm sure it worked for many other countries.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2002379.stm

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,6 65 861,00.html

    Open your eyes dude. The only reason it'll be bad in the long run is if the USA takes hypocritical, harsh and unfair action to stop others from doing precisely what it did for its own benefit in the past. Trade barriers etc etc.

    Try to see it from this point of view just for a moment.

    --
  56. Just missed serendipity... by emarkp · · Score: 1
    This story should have been reported on September 19, AKA Talk Like a Pirate Day.

    Oh well..

  57. Their preferred medium? by graybeard · · Score: 2

    CD-RRRRRRR

  58. A how-to on making your own country by hoytt · · Score: 1

    Creating your own country can be pretty easy. All you need is an object on which to stay, and a place in international waters. So you go to Shell/BP/Exxon and ask them if you can buy an old oil rig. Then you can park it ANYWHERE in international waters. And then you can start your own country. Since you can make the laws, you can make it illegal to use legal copies of MS software. You might need an army too, incase someone tries to invade your country.

    1. Re:A how-to on making your own country by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      The only person who has the means to do this is Bill Gates. I'm sure that he would make it a capital offence if you pirated his magisties warez.

    2. Re:A how-to on making your own country by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      someone has already posted the Sealand site, there are many projects which are doing things like this such as new utopia it is feasible if you have the money and legal.

  59. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not a real Country?

    Say, perhaps, the "Country" of Sealand?

    Now, here you might have something! You get the 3 guys (or whatever) to agree to register with the International Registry, and ... voila!

    Heck, they practically are a ship to begin with!

    But this raises more questions... What if you have a permanently anchored "dock" at sea? Something that floats, with pools, solar water purifiers, etc, and market it as a "vacation resort"?

    Make it big, and kinda sprawling, and make it float. What then? Cruise ships today routinely take passengers numbering thousands, already many more people than something like Sealand.

    At what point can a manmade structure become a nation?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  60. hmmm..... by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if any of the ships have "HMS Bounty" painted on them?

    --


    We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  61. Counterfitting?& if they're not sold as origin by RockyJSquirel · · Score: 1

    What's the legality if the copies are given away or sold as copies?

    Rocky J. Squirrel

  62. Re:What caused this? by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fun? Entertainment? Getting your message out? Self expression? Some how I doubt musicians started out with the idea that they were going to turn into multi million dollar stars. There are plenty of local and independent groups all across the country that perform in night clubs and bars. They do street performances, give lessons etc etc etc. They do not make millions from selling CDs, yet for some reason, they keep making music.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  63. International Law is a Farce by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There should NOT be very much international law. We already have too much. The fact that Bush wants everyone else to follow it, but doesn't want the US to be accountable to it is only an illustration of the very problem with international law. Every country has different values and societies.

    It is too hard to enforce, first of all. Second of all, it imposes the values of (mainly) the West on every country in the world.

    If Afganistan wants to make heroin and opium until the cows come home, let them.

    If Malasyans want to copy CDs and burn them, let them.

    Creating international "bully forces" to impose Western values on other countries isn't going to do anything but cause more people worldwide to become "terrorists" who are out to "kill the West."

    International law should be stripped down to cover war crimes like genocide. It shouldn't have any place outside the of things like that.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:International Law is a Farce by Xeger · · Score: 2

      I disagree that Afghanistan (or any other country) should be allowed to pump out any drug it pleases..

      Heroin is one of the most addictive substances on the books. If Afghanistan wants to sell it on the international market, then it is our right to conduct a trade embargo against them as a form of protest.

      The problem with international law, is that it favors the rich countries over the poor countries. But this isn't some evil of Western civilization--this is how the human mind works. The rich ones get all the power.

      Until there is more economic parity, there cannot be more equality.

    2. Re:International Law is a Farce by axxackall · · Score: 1
      What you are saying is the direct way to anarchy and chaos.

      US has the biggest military forces and it uses them to change the govt in other country or to make a pressure to get immunity from International Crime Court, which is supposed to deal with genocide, what is exactly what US afraid of being presecuted for (why?).

      The other countries should shut up even when their neighbours are more dangerous than Afganistan. Just shut up and do not interfere with big games of big guys.

      Moreover, those big guys in US govt make everything possible to assure that ALL other coutries are weaker than US. Thus, it would be possible to dictate them everything and to dominate the world.

      Of course any interests of local peoples are ignored. Even the life of own american people (as well europeans) is ignored and ready for being sacraficed - it is no problem that Afganistan increased its drag export (major part of it is going to US and EU) - it is even good for the business of some big guys who are behind US govt.

      As for washing the brain - no problem at all. At the time when US refused to keep peacekeepers further on Balkans, all European newspapers where full of headlines about it - CNN has been keeping a silence in 4 days. I guess 4 days american people did not know how ugly its govt is again.

      I guess the biggest chaos is in conflict of interests of big US corps and the face the US govt must leep badly protecting such interests in international hidden games.

      It is too hard to enforce

      It will much easier if US will show a good example of ebeying international laws.

      Creating international "bully forces" to impose Western values on other countries isn't going to do anything but cause more people worldwide to become "terrorists" who are out to "kill the West."

      If you, my friend, will leave for awhile you warm seat and see other people outside of US, you will hear the opposite point - people are angry that US ignore international laws.

      By the way, the goal of peacekeepers is not to bring western values, but to bring the peace - the function is known from the history of all continents. I mean to bring the peace to people first all, only after that thinking about the peace for govts.

      International law should be stripped down to cover war crimes like genocide. It shouldn't have any place outside the of things like that.

      A genocide of the govt against its own people must be the subject of such curt as well as war crimes.

      --

      Less is more !
    3. Re:International Law is a Farce by mpe · · Score: 2

      Heroin is one of the most addictive substances on the books. If Afghanistan wants to sell it on the international market, then it is our right to conduct a trade embargo against them as a form of protest.

      Plenty of things, including various alkaloids are addictive. Nicotine is also highly addictive (and toxic) but since it's produced by Americans that can't be embargoed...

    4. Re:International Law is a Farce by Xeger · · Score: 2

      Nicotine is also highly addictive (and toxic) but since it's produced by Americans that can't be embargoed...

      This is a great example of the richest country getting all the power, and it's a shame. Nicotine being even more addictive than heroin, it seems all the more criminal. But in the US' defense, there are few nations in the world whose populations would stand for a cigarette embargo. Europe dearly loves its cancer sticks, as does Asia.

  64. Not poverty. by TheLink · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    We're just following the well trodden path to success, see:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2002379.stm
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,66 5 861,00.html

    (Delete the space inserted by Slashdot).

    Malaysia isn't that poor (Indonesia maybe). People aren't starving in the streets. You can always get food, many people will give you free food or for a nominal task, and food is cheap. A 400gm loaf of bread is about USD0.45. For twice that you can have a vegetarian _all_you_can_eat_ meal. If you are starving it's probably because for some reason you can't ask, beg, find food for yourself. Just collect shopping trolleys for a supermarket for a few bucks or something.

    The climate isn't that harsh either, no winter to kill you off.

    So I'd rather be down and out in Kuala Lumpur than in New York city, or Singapore.

    In Kuala Lumpur you can probably built a little shack for shelter, open a stall, sell stuff/food etc and get away with it. If your food is good the enforcement officers will probably buy from your stall too ;).

    In Singapore, the Gov is so efficient your shack will probably be demolished by evening, and you'd have problems selling stuff without a license.

    New York city - good luck avoiding your last winter dude.

    --
  65. Re:What caused this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their business? I hate to break it to you, sparky, but just about every musician/singer/actor on Earth has to eat, you know. Do you think the guys on the S.S. Adaptec are sending a nickel to the artists involved?

    Remove the big money from the entertainment business, and you'll remove the artists soon after. ("See the Rolling Stones at the Astrodome this weekend - or go to McDonald's where they're working the counter for rent money & see them"). The big money goes, fame follows it, and the sex & drugs immediately afterwards. You take all of that out of the Entertainment industry, and what've you got? Pretty much my job.

  66. What's next? by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    Pirates in space?

  67. Free CD's == No CD's by reallocate · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    If the price of CD's -- or any other product -- drops to zero, people will stop making CD's.

    The music business is just that, a business whose purpose is to sell music. If the price of music drops below the cost of music production and distribution, the business will vanish.

    Poof, no more CD's to buy or "share".

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Free CD's == No CD's by billbaggins · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or maybe the crap artists who are in it just for the money will stop making CDs, and the "art for art's sake" folks will carry on with what they do, living by contributions or concert tix or something, distributing their music on the Internet, and generally making music for the reasons that people started making music. To express themselves. To have fun. To entertain. To praise $DEITY. Because they wanted to, not just because they could make money off of it (though I will admit that making money is almost always a nice secondary effect).

      --
      "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
      --Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Free CD's == No CD's by reallocate · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You're parroting the same lame naive line that others trot out here with regularity.

      First of all, by and large, musicians don't make CD's. Music companies make CD's. The CD business is a distribution business. Recording companies' interest in the contents of a CD is limited to whether or not you'll buy it. If they could make money selling white-noise CD's, they would. The Internet provides an opportunity for musicians to market their products directly to comsumers, by providing a substitute distribution system. Few are taking advantage of that fact (perhaps because that segment of the Internet market isn't as large as supposed), while the RIAA certainly recognizes the net's threat to the profits of the recording industry.

      Second, there is no necessary relationship between creativity and income. The world is full of struggling musicians who live from hand to mouth, trying to eke out a living. Some of them are struggling because they make music no one wants to hear. Others are struggling because they haven't had a commercial break. Yes, if their sole motive was to make money, they'd probably be lawyers or dentists. But, just like everyone else, given a chance to make money, they'll take it. If they can make money as "crap artists", they'll do just that. It's human nature.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  68. Too good to just link. by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "Heave to me hearties an' I'll regale ye with a tale o' sweet trade in the South Seas. But ye be revealing these secrets to some scurvy dog, like a landlubbin' lawyer from the MPAA or RIAA, and you'll have a taste of the cat, if'n I don't have the black spot put on ya, for dead men tell no tales.

    Look smartly there! Seems t'were some marooners what were doin' some interlopin' on the fair shores of Malaysia. But the guv'nor's soldiers was strong on the discipline. In a fortnight, many o' these buccaneers were clapped in irons and meetin' rope's end. Now the rest o' their mates t'weren't no squiffies or sprogs. They could use their deadlights. So, seein' as they didn't want to dance with Mr. Jack Ketch, they came about handsomely, took up with a sea artist and went on the account.

    Now these corsairs made full sail 'til they be several leagues to sea, in international waters, where Jack Valenti's letters o' reprisal aren't nothing but bilgewater. There all hands turn to, copying chanteys, with no quarter given for DRM. Blimey if this doesn't have the gov'nor's soldiers bilged on their own anchor. Already the soldiers be tryin' to bring in the ol' Guarda Coasta, but they'll have no luck, says I.
    "

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    1. Re:Too good to just link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats, you can copy and paste. What a skill.

  69. Price point and region encoding by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I've always wondered about is the use of region encoding, but on a much smaller scale. You mention how you're willing to pay $20 for a DVD, because you can't be bothered to spend the time ripping it - but what about someone who only makes $5 an hour? Is it worth THEIR time?

    I have rather well-off friends financially who don't even blink an eye at plopping down $500-$1000 a month for PC software, whereas with my student status, that's more than I make most months. So, I resort to what most students do, and still use the software.

    Now, we all know one of the big uses for region encoding is so that content producers can effectively price-fix their products: they know they'll still make a profit selling a CD for $5 in say, Malaysia, but not any more than $5 because the average Malaysian makes 1/4 of what the average American does (all hypothetically speaking).

    With a very large wage gap between the rich and poor in the US, it almost makes me wonder: CDs for $5 (still making a profit, remember)would sell boatloads to poorer families who normally would just download them. HOWEVER, the richer folk among us would buy the CD, even if it was priced at $50.

    Now the only thing left to do is have the **AA buy some legislation that allows it to check your financial status, and price your goods accordingly. "Look, we've nearly eliminated those evil pirates, AND we're being nice to the little guy!"

    Wow, I think I just scared myself.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  70. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to be careful, though, or Dennis Hopper and his Smokers will start raiding.

  71. Eh? by Fyndlorn · · Score: 1

    What you suggest is just plain silly, until there is an actual effort by the governments of those countries to curb piracy, or there is a social stigma attached to buying conterfiet software it doesn't matter how cheaply the companies price thier products!

    Imagine I open a store there and price the software more 'reasonably' at 28 ringgit ("Word now at 92% off!!") do you think thee is any chance someone will buy it when they cna get the same product for 7 and not feel badly about it? Not to mention the fact that if this ever happened people would just buy thier software and have it shipped from overseas where is is priced at the 'locally affordable value'.

  72. 2 problems with the idea.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    2 Problems i see:

    1 - While being out in international waters negates the issues with copyrights, ( until they try to distribute the copies that is.. ) it also negates various laws that *protect* them.. such as not being hijacked when discovered.. hope they got big guns and a fast ship..

    2- speaking of fast ships.. is a boat stable enough to do copying?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  73. Format by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 0

    So what format are they burning onto - CD, ARRRR?

    god i'm so funny it hurts.

  74. Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When you go to college (if you do), an ethics professor will teach you that not everything that is moral is legal, and not everything that is legal is moral. Maybe it will take a real ethics class for you to realize that the mere observation that an activity is illegal according to some standard is no argument at all that there is anything wrong with it.

    I suppose if you lived in the 60's you'd say "I don't care about your principles and arguments--the law is clear: Niggers go in the back of the bus!"

    1. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks for resorting to the typical Know-Nothing Slashdot tactic of resorting to gratuitous insult and ad hominem attacks.

      None of this has anything to do with legality or morality. It's only about tactics. It's just about cheap, throw-away music.

      If you think "sharing" music will get you what you want, fine, go ahead. I think it will cause you to lose and simply get more draconian copyright restrictions placed on all of us, including people like me who don't really care a twit about whether some college student can afford to buy CD. That's the point I'm making. Morality and legality have nothing to do with it.

      BTW, your equation of the civil rights struggle in the 60's to the music business is a gross and demeaning insult to the people who lived in that struggle.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    2. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about the struggle of fags? Would you mind sharing your insight on that?

    3. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 2

      How about the struggle of Anonymous Cowards to develop coherent thought?

      Your personal insights ought to be very revealing.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    4. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reallocate's thoughts: "Oooh.. look at me, I'm so smart... I deliberately use language which is much more formal and sophisticated than what is called for in a casual discussion forum, so that I can look really intelligent and try to subversively pass off my opinions as fact, while at the same time insulting the very same group of people I'm addressing ... "

    5. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Why should anyone stoop so low as to insult you, when you're doing such a fine job of it yourself?

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    6. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Disevidence · · Score: 1

      They're going to use you as the first case to prove that posting anon causes permanent stupidity and immature attacks.

      Maybe you have trouble with big words, put all he was trying to do was put an argument succintly in place. If had used smaller/other words, perhaps his direct meaning would of been missed.

      If i say fuck off, i could mean a few things. In colloquial language, it means to go some place else. In literal terms, i could be asking you to have sex with "off", whoever that maybe.

      But this is all semantics. His words aren't big, your sense of paranoia, angst and self-pity are just too large.

      (Yes, i misspelt some words. But you still know what i mean precisely.)

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    7. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      No, I insulted you only alongside my making a cognet (if obvious) argument. Your "insightful" comment consisted of nothing but the observation that the piracy described in the article was illegal, and leaped from there to the conclusion that it's bad.

      I hope even you have enough sense to recognize that as a foolish argument, and so do most readers here, but it's worth repeating anyway. The comment moderation is making me think you are not alone in being fooled by that line, and that what's obvious to most people is not too obvious to be repeated on Slashdot.

      I'm afraid everyone needs a new reason for thinking that what the VCD counterfitters do is wrong. It's illegality is totally beside the point; unjust laws are not that unusual.

    8. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Spork -- let me sum up reallocate's argument *very* succinctly:

      Don't shoot yourself in the foot.

      Go back and re-read. He's not arguing about legality or morality -- only practicality.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    9. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Spork, if your goal is to convince people that counterfeiting digital media is ethically correct, I'm not interested. Frankly, I don't care what people think about it.

      What I do care about is preventing the passage of a new legislation that restricts traditional fair use even more than the DMCA. I fear the passage of legislation that mandates strict control of Internet use via required hardware controls and enforced ISP regulation. (Imagine a day when only "approved" hardware can legally access the net and when access providers are required to block unapproved hardware. Imagine a day when certain packets cannot be addressed to your IP address.)

      Preventing all that comes down to old fashioned political effort in Washington, plus help from folks like Lessig, the EFF, and several new organizations that have sprung up. It is a matter of getting legislation drafted, getting it to a vote, and lobbying, campaigning and hard work. Nothing the P2P networks or the so-called community can do will change that.

      All this will be especially difficult because copyright and intellectual property issues are below the radar of almost everyone in the U.S. Unless you belong to the small minority who have a personal or financial investment in filesharing, copyright and IP are just boring lawyer mumbo-jumbo.

      Pseudo-metaphysical postings on /. that attempt to make the case for the morality/ethicality/legality of counterfeiting and unauthorized reproduction damage do not help. Coupled with the frequent vitrolic and unreasoned responses from the True Believers, they only serve to provide more evidence to the RIAA and others that the real goal of this "community" is the elimination of Constitutionally mandated copyright protection (note that eliminating copyright in the U.S. requires a Constitutional amendment), the end of IP, and the destruction of digital media commerce.

      If I was an RIAA lobbyist testifying on the Hill, I'd show up with a stack of /. postings like yours.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    10. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by aminorex · · Score: 2

      Power flows from the end of a gun. -Mao Ze Dong

      You are a slave, and your children are slaves, owned
      and serving at the whim, *surviving* at the whim of
      the reigning plutocracy. I think you're fussing
      about the pinstriping on your guillotine. The only
      way to really address the corruption of the
      political process in the era of centralized control
      of the mass media is terrorism.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  75. From Waterworld to Super Mario Bros. by yerricde · · Score: 2

    You have to be careful, though, or Dennis Hopper and his Smokers will start raiding.

    In that case, just send Bob Hoskins and John Leguizamo after them. Or send in Diddy Kong; he's dealt with pirates before.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  76. And once the piracy is done? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what do these guys do with those huge chests of burned cds? Bury them and make a map?

  77. What is next for the RIAA? by DiveX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long is it going to be now for RIAA to ask for legislative permission to use torpedoes and their own naval forces to take care of the 'pirate problem'? After all, if they can hack into your systems with full legal protection to go after the small fry traders, then shouldn't they have just as much power to go after the bigger violators? How long until we have a real RIAA Capt Nemo in a sub with anti-society crew members on a quest against the pirates of the world?

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  78. Bring back Privateering. by blair1q · · Score: 2


    If they have pirate ships, we can have privateers, and sink them.

    1. Re:Bring back Privateering. by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      umm, privateers where pirates who held letters of marque. A letter of marque ment, when country A was at war with country B you can committ acts of piracy agaisnt country B and have a safe harbor to return (country A).

      Hehe, maybe Sony would be interested in allowing me to pirate cd's produced by Virgin records for example, as long as I don't touch anything produced by Sony. In exchange they will provide me with lawyers to legaly protect my ass. Well fat chance of that happening

      --
      >
    2. Re:Bring back Privateering. by Xeger · · Score: 2

      Seriously, this isn't far off. Industrial espionage is only one step away from the scenario you describe.

    3. Re:Bring back Privateering. by blair1q · · Score: 2

      You've been watching too much Technicolor.

      The definition of Privateer has no requirement that the privateer be a pirate.

      --Blair

  79. Quit talking that crazy talk! by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Well, obviously if they were selling MS Office in Malaysia for 7 ringgit, it would soon be selling for that here in the states.

    So in effect you're saying that a software company that has completely covered it's development costs with original retail sales of some software, and now makes the current versions for $0.47 should be selling that software for only a 1000% profit instead of 1 million%?

    What are smoking? That's crazy talk! How are they supposed to feed their children??!?!?

    --
    -Styopa
  80. This brings a whole new meaning... by Q3vi1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah, back to the good ol' days of pirating. Well, good new days? Who knows, all I know is that it'll be interesting to see walk the plank for poor quality, or stealing the captian's mead.

  81. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by surfimp · · Score: 1

    At what point can a manmade structure become a nation?

    At what point is a nation not a manmade structure?

  82. Pirate origins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've *heard* that the word pirate in reference to software pirates comes from when ye olde kiddies decided to steal airwaves with "pirate" radio stations. (Back when the BBC started up, i think) They would set up their stations just offshore of Britain with all their equipment, and because they were not on British soil they couldn't be legally touched.

    I apologise if, however, this is complete tosh.

  83. Nope your both wrong! by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    It's the distributing of CD's whether it's free or not that is illegal! That's how it is in the U.S. at least. The manufacturers of CD's may put in stuff to prevent copying but it's not illegal for backup purposes.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  84. Holy L. Ron Hubbbard! by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Holy L. Ron! The pirates have taken a page from the Pope of Fugitives. Elron, founder of Scien*gy, spent, what, ten years at sea in a converted freighter (correct me here), for the sole purpose of not getting arrested on numerous warrants.

    I think I can see, like legal sheet lightning on the horizon, the copyright industry gearing up to remove the protection of international waters.

    Which is doubly amusing, since the Church of Scien*ology was one of the first instigators of digital copyright law change. Back in '91, I recall, they first tore after anon.penet.fi for relaying their "copyrighted" Xenu tracts. And in '95, when they were confiscating PC's for having "illegal" copies. And certainly when they helped out with the DMCA legislation.

    I just think it's funny, in a sad way. Round the circle we go. Now the copyright kings in RIAA et al. will set out after international water neutrality, seeking to to remove the protections that once saved the founder of one of the most litigious copyright abusing organizations.

    If the protection of the high seas is removed, as I posit, then there will be no place left to get away from the U.S.'s interpretation of intellectual property. No Switzerlands of the mind.

  85. No one said it yet? by VivianC · · Score: 2

    Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of those!

    Sorry. I couldn't control myself.

    --
    Viv

    Gmail invites for ip
  86. Imagine by Theom · · Score: 0

    Coast guard ship: We found some pirates, what should we do? CG HQ: Who did they attack? CG S: The MPAA. CG HQ: We can't find that ship in the database...

    --

    mp3: l33t term for empty.
  87. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At what point is a nation not a manmade structure?

    A nation, in the final analysis, remains a nation when it fends off attack by challengers to its status. Sadly.

    It is similar to my personal definition of intelligent life: a lifeform that shoots back at humans -- and wins. Whales would be considered ILF's if they fired frickin' lasers at the whalers.

    Nations that want to remain nations, even if they are floating platforms in the ocean or spinning city-states in solar orbit, must have legal, economic, or martial ability to defend and counterattack.

    Sealand exists because it isn't worth anyone's time to remove them. And a nation that simply removes Sealand will face really bad PR if they don't fabricate some excuse first: select 1) for pedophiles 2) for terrorists 3) for Drugs.

    If Sealand gets private support, as offshore tax havens do, it will continue to exist, bar provocation. The pirates, however, will be sunk. No one is looking, and no one cares.

  88. How much of too much in enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is so sad that people pirate the
    awesome product of Hollywood and
    the money-monger culture.

    I quess the next time a rich music/film
    company whore monger goes to Mallasia they
    will only be able to buy two little girls for
    sex instead of three. . .because their profits
    have been so cut into.

  89. Arrrr mateys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't y'all know to be a pirate, ye need a pirate name?

  90. NATO Russia Council by yerricde · · Score: 1

    and when was Russia admitted to NATO

    Russia was never fully admitted to NATO. That's why I put "admitted" in scare-quotes. I was talking about the NATO-Russia Council.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  91. Oh the irony! by SuperMario666 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be hilarious if said IP pirates have some not-so-pleasant run-ins with actual pirates, who are quite prevalent in those waters.

  92. The CD-Arrrrrrr game by masterkool · · Score: 1

    See how many times you can spot the joke about CD-Arrrrr's in this discussion.

    --
    I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
  93. Why Bother? by Razzak · · Score: 1

    I don't see why they should bother. They've probably considered that and decided they'll make more money selling it to businesses at 1500 ringgit than selling it to everyone at 50 ringgit... then let the pirates do their work to maintain market share.

    Software companies are out to make money, not make sure everyone can use their product.

  94. Another joke by gulfan · · Score: 0

    Ye ne'er been hearing of Captain Chan? He be having a spindle for his left hand!

  95. Hmm piracy is good.. by lidistick · · Score: 1

    with regards to my statement, unless you've been to Malaysia and been able to buy Windows XP pro for USD $2.50 and Office XP for another USD$2.50, you cannot believe the bargain you just got yourself. The average wage in Malaysia is approximately USD500 ~ USD1000 (approx RM2000 ~ RM4000). The approximate price for a PC is RM2000 (decent set-up). Who can afford an operating software that is unreliable and costs upwards of 25% to 40% of the PC's price? and that would just be the OS. Plus, some of us happen to do some form of work on the computer and the original copy of windows office is another RM300. Let's not talk about those rich enough to afford original software. It's all about dollars and cents. It's all about economics. If I save some money on software, that money saved (which is a heck of a lot!) could be used elsewhere. The premise here is that, "I've earned my money, I'll spend my money any way I like". I cannot understand why recording companies and softare developers charge so much for CDs. Their profit margin is huge. would i really mind if Robby Williams gets less than his 80 million quid? or if Bill Gates becomes the 4th richest man in the world? As for enforcement in Malaysia..... bugger that. I rather they spent their energies on more important stuff like violent crime and pickpockets (how ironic?!) instead of devoting their efforts to appease the Seattle bigwigs. Piracy is competition Microsoft and the Music industry never had. Finito.

  96. This isn't new.. by tperkow · · Score: 1

    When I lived in Taiwan in '98 this was already pretty common knowledge -- these ships aren't operated by garden variety pirates, but criminal mafias (mostly Chinese) that have their hands in anything that can make them money.

    US software firms are being too greedy considering the average income of many of these countries.. Sure there's a rich elite that can afford anything (& more) than we buy in the US, but these companies watched the market for these product build.

    I worked in a local Taiwanese distributor, and when they're selling the pirated version for $4-5 US, you don't have a chance of selling many $35-40 games. Sell them for $10-$15 and people would have had the pride of owning a legitimate copy push them over the edge.. Of course, we could never convince Global companies to go for that.

    My opinion: The media companies created this. They won't be able to sell the full priced versions anyway. Sell merchandise and live with it!

  97. Re:What caused this? tsarkon reports, tevis gay s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Qui Gon stood on the roof, looking out at Coruscant. He would have preferred the stars, but the city lights made that impossible. For the first time since accepting Tevis as his apprentice, the two were separated. Qui Gon was finding that the younger man's absence interfered with his concentration and drained his energy. He missed him desperately. Without Tevis's familiar presence in his mind, Qui Gon felt empty, bereft.
    "Miss him you do."
    Qui Gon acknowledged his new companion without turning around. "Good evening, Master Yoda."
    Yoda walked to the edge of the roof then levitated himself onto the wall which ran along it. Gazing out at the city, he observed, "Difficult it is for Master and Apprentice to be parted. Especially difficult for you it is, hmmm."
    Qui Gon felt no need to reply. The other Master knew the truth of his own words.
    "If this hard for you, how must it be for him?"
    "Tevis is strong." Qui Gon replied, not liking the direction in which he knew the conversation was going.
    "Yes, but strong enough to survive without you, he may not be." Yoda turned and looked at Qui Gon. "Jeopardize his training you have. Clouded his future has become."
    Qui Gon shook his head. "You worry too much about the future. It is the present which shapes the future, not the other way around. Focus upon this moment and the future will take care of itself." He was quite possibly the only living Jedi who had ever spoken to Yoda in such a fashion. The others revered him. Revered him too much in Qui Gon's opinion. Yoda was wise, but he was not omniscient.
    "Ignore the warnings of the force you do, then." This was an old argument between them, and Yoda dutifully spoke his lines.
    "No. I do not ignore them. I choose to focus on the feelings and intuitions I experience in the present. I do not choose to let myself be haunted by shadows of what may be."
    "Focusing on the moment were you? Hmmm. When took Tevis to your bed, you did?"
    Startled by the bluntness of his language, Qui Gon looked down at Yoda. "Do you really think so little of my judgment, Master Yoda? Do you believe I would knowingly harm Tevis, or place my desires before his well being?"
    "Knowingly or not, endanger him you have."
    "I disagree. My death will be hard for him, but he will survive it." Qui Gon gave his former master a hard look. "When that time comes he will need to draw upon all he has learned." His voice one of calm certainty, he continued, "Including what he learned in my arms." Not waiting for a response, he added, "Would it have been better to leave the feelings between us unacknowledged and unacted upon, leaving him to doubt both himself and me?"
    Yoda shook his head. "Hope you are right I do. But fear what may become of him I do."
    "Set your fear aside Master. Fear leads to anger; anger leads to hate; and hate leads to suffering."
    Yoda glared at him. "Very amusing, Master Qui Gon. Your apprentice's impertinence I sense."
    Qui Gon grinned, "He has been a good influence."
    "Hmmmph." Yoda lowered himself back to the roof and walked toward the door. As he reached it, Qui Gon spoke, "Master, take care of him. Help him when I cannot."
    Yoda looked back at the tall Jedi. This admission of his own fear had cost him. "I will, Qui Gon, I will." With that he left Qui Gon to his loneliness.
    Tevis was antsy. There was no other word for it. He was unable to focus on the conversation around him. His entire being was tensed in anticipation of the moment when they would come out of hyperspace and he would once again feel his master's presence in his mind. He longed for Qui Gon's presence, and his flesh.
    The separation of the last few days had been more difficult than he had anticipated. In addition to the absence of his master, Tevis had had to cope with the unwanted advances of his peers. His former bedmates wondered at his behavior of the last few weeks. While on Coruscant he had been able to find excuses, but that had been much harder to do when it was just six of them on Camaasi. Two of the group were former lovers and both, individually, had sought to resume their previous relationship with Tevis. After both were rebuffed, along with another of their group, speculation had ensued about his unexpected celibacy. His fellow apprentices had reached the obvious conclusion, that someone had captured Tevis's heart. It had not taken them long to deduce who that someone was.
    Tevis had chosen not to respond to their teasing speculation. He would not lie. Nor would he openly admit his relationship with his master. For Tevis feared exposure, feared what the Council would do should they learn of it. He did not want to be parted from Qui Gon and that seemed to him a very real possibility, should the Council find out. Qui Gon did not share his fear, but his own natural reserve had dovetailed with Tevis's fear of discovery. Without a word ever passing between them on the subject, they had agreed to be discreet. Tevis could only hope that upon their return to Coruscant his peers would find something, someone new to gossip about.
    Checking his time sense, Tevis rejoiced to discover that in only three minutes they would be out of hyperspace. Three minutes and Qui Gon's presence would once again fill his mind, completing him. Three minutes. He panicked, remembering the surprise he had purchased for his master. It wouldn't be much of a surprise if he did not get some shields around his knowledge of it. Hastily, he separated his thoughts on the subject from the rest of his mind and put a shield around them. Qui Gon could easily break the shield, but he would not. He had always respected any desire on his Padawan's part to shield a part of his mind. Privacy was even more important, now that there were so few barriers between them. No one should have to share all of his thoughts, all of the time.
    Joy flowed through Tevis. Delight danced along every nerve in his body, in every corner of his mind. They had come out of hyperspace. He was home. He was with Qui Gon.
    Welcome home, my Padawan
    Tevis fought the urge to laugh aloud. Master, he acknowledged Qui Gon. Then conversation ended as they explored each other's mind, drinking in the presence that had been so sorely missed.
    After many minutes, Qui Gon spoke again. I have a surprise for you.
    Really, Tevis asked with delighted anticipation.
    Yes,Tevis could sense his master's amusement. I didn't cook.
    Tevis laughed aloud. The others turned to look at him, puzzled. His laughter quickly ceased. "Sorry" he apologized, embarrassed. "Master Qui Gon said something amusing."
    That just caused them to stare harder.
    "You've spoken with him already?" The young woman to his right asked.
    "Yes," Tevis replied, sheepishly. The speculation would certainly not end now. Damn. "Master Qui Gon had something he needed to tell me. It was urgent."
    "And funny," the other apprentice observed dryly.
    Tevis decided it would be best not to attempt further explanation.
    At last their ship landed. Grabbing the knapsack which held his few belongings and Qui Gon's surprise, he headed for the door . 'I hope he likes it,' Tevis thought as he stepped onto the ramp. His breath caught in his chest. Qui Gon was there waiting for him. His master had not mentioned meeting the transport. It took all of his control to keep from running down the ramp and into his master's arms. Instead, Tevis allowed himself a slight increase in pace, and in moments he was standing before his master, gazing up into those blue eyes.
    The two men looked at each other. Oblivious to what was occurring around them, they were utterly unaware of the attention their meeting was drawing. Tevis's travel companions stared at the two men. The air about them was filled with the force, which was flowing between and around them in a manner which was palpable to the other Jedi.
    After several minutes of simply looking at his Padawan, savoring his presence, Qui Gon reiterated his earlier greeting. "Welcome home, Tevis."
    Tevis smiled at his master, his eyes not leaving that beloved face. "Thank you, Master. I am happy to be home."
    Turning, the two men began the walk back to Qui Gon's quarters. "How was the trip?"
    "Educational," was the brief reply.
    "Good," Qui Gon chuckled softly, draping an arm around his apprentice's shoulders.
    The moment the door closed behind them, Qui Gon had Tevis in his arms, kissing him with a passion that bordered on desperation. All of the control he had shown during the walk to his quarters was gone.
    "Qui Gon," Tevis moaned, pulling the other man closer, seeking to find a way to crawl inside him.
    In response Qui Gon tightened his arms around Tevis, I missed you. I missed you desperately.
    I love you, Qui Gon. I love you.
    Qui Gon growled low in his throat, raining passionate bites and kisses on the younger man's face and neck. Lifting Tevis in his arms he headed toward the bed chamber.
    Within moments they were both naked. Hands and mouths moved unceasingly. Without warning, Qui Gon grabbed Tevis's wrists and held them above his head. His voice thick with lust, he whispered, "I want to look at you."
    Tevis held still, watching his master as his master's eyes roved over him. The look on his master's face made his heart want to burst. It was a look full of intense longing, edged with deep tenderness. Tevis had never before felt so loved, so valued. Qui Gon's eyes returned to his face, "You are so damn beautiful, my Padawan." He said, releasing Tevis's wrists. "I dreamt of you every night. Remembering how you look, spread out like this, naked, in my arms, flushed with desire."
    Unable to think of a response, Tevis sat up and touched his master's face. It was all there, in that touch. His intense love for Qui Gon, his need for him. Qui Gon caught the hand in his large one and kissed it. 'Gods, I missed those hands,' Tevis thought.
    The edges of Qui Gon's mouth turned up and Tevis knew his thoughts had been sensed by the older man. Did you? Qui Gon asked, kissing the inside of Tevis's wrist. And what precisely did you miss them doing?
    Opening his mind to Qui Gon, Tevis sent him images. Qui Gon's hands on him, touching his face, his chest, squeezing his nipples, stroking his cock, holding his hips as Qui Gon thrust into him.
    Qui Gon groaned and pulled Tevis fully against him, kissing him. I think I can arrange that. He lowered the younger man back to the bed, his lips still glued to Tevis's. Lying next to him, Qui Gon deepened the kiss, his tongue moving into Tevis's mouth. His right hand roamed over Tevis, up his side, across his chest, down to his abdomen, and back up again, fingers moving around his apprentice's hardening nipple.
    Tevis gasped into his master's mouth. Tangling his hands in Qui Gon's hair, Tevis returned his master's kiss. He drew the other man's tongue into his mouth, sucked it, then released it, replacing it with his lower lip.
    Qui Gon's hand moved to Tevis's other nipple. He stroked softly, it hardened under his fingertips, sending a burst of electric pleasure up into his fingers. Pulling his mouth from Tevis's he moved downward. Trailing kisses down Tevis's chest he moved toward his destination-- his apprentice's straining cock.
    As Qui Gon's mouth closed over his cock, Tevis had to bite his lip to keep from screaming. A few minutes of his master's skillful ministrations and he was near coming. But he wasn't ready, not yet. He pulled Qui Gon's head upward, sensing his master's reluctance to release his prize. Qui Gon raised his head and Tevis dove for him. Kissing him with fierce abandon, Tevis urged Qui Gon onto his back. He lay atop his master, alternating between kissing his lips and nuzzling his neck.
    Qui Gon clung to his apprentice, his arms and legs wrapped around him. Tevis filled his senses, his scent, the warmth of his skin, the firm young flesh pressed into his, the skillful mouth playing across him. Nothing compared to this, to having his beloved in his arms, in his mind. He wanted to be inside Tevis, to feel surrounded by him, lost in him.
    Straddling his master's hips Tevis reached for the oil kept atop the headboard. He slowly oiled his master's cock. Loving the feel of that firm flesh in his hands, he stroked slowly up the underside of his master's cock with an oiled palm. Then down the other side with the other hand. Taking it between his palms, deliberately not encircling it with his fingers, Tevis stroked up and down. Qui Gon's feelings flowed to him. The sensations shooting through his master came to Tevis so clearly that they were almost his own. Qui Gon's need to be inside him had become nearly unbearable.
    Tevis moved over his master's cock, placing it at the entrance to his anus. He relaxed fully, letting himself slide down onto it. He gave himself over to the now familiar sensation of Qui Gon inside him, Qui Gon filling him. He looked down at his master, eyes lovingly tracing the familiar face. He started to move slowly, but it was not enough. All of the lust and longing which had built up during their separation poured through him, and Tevis began to move rapidly, demandingly.
    Qui Gon's powerful hands grasped his hips and held him still. Tevis cried out in frustration. Qui Gon began moving him slowly, seeking the place they both knew was there, the place that would bring them both a profound ecstasy. There. Qui Gon felt it and moved very slowly. In that instant, they came, mind and bodies linked.
    Still shuddering Tevis collapsed onto his master's chest, grateful for the strength in those encircling arms. Part of him wanted to say what he was feeling, to pour it out in a rush. But he knew there was really no need. Qui Gon knew. He always knew.
    Qui Gon kissed the top his head. "There is something to be said for restraint, my young Padawan," he said softly.
    Tevis looked up at him. Brushing his master's lips briefly with his own, he replied, "Yes, Master." Then he returned his head to the crook of Qui Gon's shoulder, where it fit so perfectly.
    Tevis woke. He was nestled against Qui Gon's back, his arm around his master's chest. He allowed himself to savor the luxury of waking up next to his master. He had missed this.
    Then he remembered the surprise he had purchased on his trip. He rose carefully and went to the other room to retrieve his knapsack. He quickly returned to the bed chamber. Placing the object where Qui Gon would not see it, he slid back into his master's bed.
    Softly, the contact so light it was almost not there, he kissed the back of Qui Gon's neck, stroking his hair. He sensed his master stirring and moved his lips to the side of his neck. He nibbled gently, then nipped at an ear lobe. Qui Gon's awareness of his surroundings increased, and he came fully awake as Tevis's tongue slid into his ear.
    Qui Gon started to turn over, seeking to take Tevis into his arms. Tevis placed a hand on his shoulder and moved him gently back onto his side. "If you move or speak master I will stop. You do not want that do you?" Tevis asked, his voice quiet, his tone firm.
    "No."
    "Good. Now don't speak again." With that Tevis returned his full attention to his master's ear. He nipped softly along the edge of it. Then ran his tongue along it. Qui Gon closed his eyes, savoring the sensation.
    Tevis resumed caressing Qui Gon's neck. He traced the side of it, from just under the ear to the nape, with his fingers. It was one of those there/almost not there touches. He knew Qui Gon found touches like that maddening. He intended to use alot of them.
    He followed his fingers with his lips. He began with light brushes of his lips, then traced the same path again. The caress a little firmer this time. He did it again, still firmer. Qui Gon was practically squirming. "Keep still or I stop," he reminded his master. Qui Gon stilled. He took a little bit of skin from an especially sensitive part of Qui Gon's neck into his mouth and sucked gently, increasing the strength of his sucking slowly.
    At the same time he moved his hand over Qui Gon's side stroking along his ribs. When he reached his hips, Tevis moved the hand over Qui Gon's hip, avoiding the cock that leaped in anticipation of his touch. The hand snaked up Qui Gon's front across his abdomen and chest, brushing lightly against hardened nipples. He felt Qui Gon suppress a moan. 'Good,' he smiled to himself. It was a heady feeling, having free reign of his master's body like this. Being the one in control.
    He let go of his master's neck, wondering vaguely if he had left a mark. The thought of his master with a hickey almost made him giggle. But he controlled his thoughts and resumed caressing his master's nipple. His touch was firmer now, but not what Qui Gon wanted. Relenting, he squeezed it between his thumb and forefinger. Rewarded, he sensed Qui Gon struggle to control another moan. He failed.
    "Shhhh," Tevis soothed, turning Qui Gon onto his back. Spreading himself out along his master, he attended to the side of Qui Gon's neck which he had been able to reach earlier. Qui Gon started to wrap his arms around the man atop him but Tevis stopped him. Remember, if you move I stop. His arms returned to his sides, his hands gripping the sheets.
    Satisfied that his master's neck and ear had received their due, Tevis inched further down Qui Gon's body. His mouth danced across Qui Gon's chest, nipping, licking, blowing lightly on flesh wet with saliva. Straddling his master's hips, he ran his hands up Qui Gon's arms. The feel of hard muscle under his hands sent a thrill through Tevis. He continued, savoring his master's broad shoulders, before moving down across his chest. Reaching his master's waist, he reversed direction. As his hands slid down to Qui Gon's hands, he gently removed them from the sheets. He brought first one and then the other to his mouth, sucking on a fingertip, grazing it with his teeth. He reached into Qui Gon's mind, encouraging him to imagine that sucking, those teeth on another location. Qui Gon groaned at the thought.
    Smiling softly to himself, Tevis released his master's hands and moved lower, kneeling between his legs. He moved his hands along them. Hard muscle under his hands. Up Qui Gon's inner thighs he traced, his thumbs moving along the side of his testicles. Close your eyes he commanded.
    Shuddering with anticipation, Qui Gon complied. The bottle of oil flew to Tevis's hand. Moistening a finger, he moved it along the rim of Qui Gon's asshole, then pushed forward slowly. Qui Gon arched. Tevis stopped. When his master was again lying flat on the bed, he resumed pushing forward. When his finger was all of the way inside his master, he paused, then began to withdraw it slowly. After a few more strokes a second finger joined the first. Qui Gon was struggling for control, struggling to keep from moving onto Tevis's hands. Tevis touched his mind. You are doing very well, Master. If you continue to do so I may let you speak, he paused, or are you beyond coherent speech? Qui Gon moaned. I thought so, Tevis replied. His pleasure in his master's aroused state shining through him.
    Tevis withdrew his fingers and reached for the gift he had purchased for his master. Qui Gon, lost without those fingers, started to open his eyes. "Uh-uh, the eyes stay closed," Tevis admonished.
    Tevis applied the oil to the dildo in his hands. It was not large, but then Tevis shared Master Yoda's view that size mattered not. Oiling complete, he placed the item at Qui Gon's entrance. Qui Gon started at the feel, wondering what it was that Tevis held. Relax Master. Trust me. I will not hurt you. Qui Gon responded to the familiar words by doing as his apprentice asked. He relaxed and the dildo slid easily inside him.
    Qui Gon was lost in sensation. In the peculiar feeling of being penetrated by his padawan, and yet not. He could not believe that this was really happening, that he had allowed it to happen. Qui Gon Jinn was not a man who surrendered. He was always in control. That is what lay beneath his legendary calm. Only one person had ever gotten past that control, ever had him so beside himself with desire that he had acted in ways he had never imagined himself capable of being. That same person was now fucking him with an unknown object. And Qui Gon didn't fight it. All that mattered was pleasing Tevis. If Tevis wanted this, then Qui Gon would allow it.
    Tevis moved the artificial cock inside his master slowly, very slowly. Qui Gon was moaning incoherently now. His hands clenching and unclenching around the sheets. Tevis decided it was time to send his master over the edge. Open your eyes, love. Look at me. Watch. Tevis gazed directly into Qui Gon's eyes for a moment. He gloried in seeing his master like this, open, vulnerable, more aroused than Tevis had ever seen him. Smiling gently, he lowered his head and took his master's cock into his mouth. The warm wetness of Tevis's mouth combined with the dildo still moving within him to send Qui Gon into a shattering orgasm. Tevis swallowed again and again, drinking in his master's juices, further intensifying Qui Gon's pleasure. Tevis stopped moving the dildo when his master came, resuming as his spasms subsided. In a moment Qui Gon was coming again. "Tevis," he cried out.
    As his second orgasm subsided, Qui Gon sat up, reaching for the man kneeling between his legs, kissing him. You, Tevis, you.
    Tevis understood exactly what his master meant. He withdrew the dildo. Then he kissed his master with a tenderness that left them both aching. Gently he urged Qui Gon onto his stomach. He ran his fingers along his master's cheeks, parting them with oiled fingers. Assuring himself there was enough lubricant left from the dildo, he positioned himself behind his master. Then he slid forward. Afterward, he would swear to himself that he saw stars.
    Tevis had never penetrated anyone in this fashion before. Being inside his master brought him an intense, indescribable pleasure. It was tight and hot. He reached out for his master, seeking to draw him deeper into his mind, even as he slid deeper into Qui Gon's body.
    For Qui Gon too this was new. All of his lovers prior to his Padawan had been women. No one had ever been inside him before. He had believed that he knew what it felt like from sharing Tevis's mind. But he had not. The feeling of being stretched and opened was entirely unexpected. He felt both completely exposed and totally safe. Tevis was inside him. Tevis loved him. Tevis...
    Qui Gon groaned. Give yourself to me, surrender to me Tevis's voice urged softly in his mind. Tevis held himself completely still, leaving Qui Gon to be the one to move, to find their rhythm. Qui Gon began to move and Tevis reached a hand around to cup his master's cock. Qui Gon rocked himself back onto Tevis's cock and then forward onto his hand. All was pure sensation, and Tevis.
    After what seemed like both an eternity and a heartbeat, he came. And Tevis came with him. They rocked together, their focus on each other so complete that not even a moan escaped.
    When he stopped shaking, Qui Gon was convinced that he would never move again. His muscles were simply no longer capable of it. They had become gelatinous. Tevis moved up on the bed, beside him. Qui Gon turned over and stared at his young lover in wonder. Reaching up he stroked his cheek, "You are incredible."
    Tevis's face split into a wide grin. "I am glad you enjoyed yourself master."
    "I'm sure you are," Qui Gon laughed. He was in that state that comes from truly incredible sex, the one where all is right with the world, where nothing can be felt but joy. "How...how did you ever?"
    "I needed something to think about during those long lonely nights on Camaasi." Tevis grinned even wider. "Fantasizing about you seemed a very worthwhile way to spend my time."
    "Indeed."
    Tevis laughed, "Of course, that master of Jedi control, Qui Gon Jinn, would never allow himself the luxury of a little fantasy."
    "Never," Qui Gon agreed, "Unless you were in it." He pulled Tevis against him, kissing him fervently. You, you, Tevis, are the only one who has ever been able to make me lose control.
    I know. Tevis replied. He pulled away from his master's demanding mouth, to look into his face. "There is something to be said for a lack of restraint, Master."
    "So I am beginning to see." Qui Gon answered, reaching again for his apprentice.
    If you keep kissing me like that we'll never get breakfast.
    Qui Gon sent Tevis a tendril of surprise at the thought. I thought you knew Tevis. You are breakfast

  98. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by rworne · · Score: 1
    It is similar to my personal definition of intelligent life: a lifeform that shoots back at humans -- and wins. Whales would be considered ILF's if they fired frickin' lasers at the whalers.
    They just might have, if they had opposable thumbs.
    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  99. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
    Why don't you just give peace a chance?

    The best way to avoid war is to disarm.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  100. Arrrrrr by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    Looks like I'm going to find a new line of work.
    i wish they would advertise Corporate Spy in the classifieds, it would make my search for the job closest to something from a William Gibson novel so much easier.

    --
    >
  101. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by lamz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why don't you just give peace a chance?
    The best way to avoid war is to disarm.

    Oh yeah? Tell that to the frickin' laser-totin' trigger-happy whales!

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  102. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

    Nations that want to remain nations ... must have legal, economic, or martial ability to defend and counterattack.

    Dude, you're scaring me. I'm CANADIAN!

    S

  103. Meet The New Boss... by reallocate · · Score: 2

    Nuts to you. Here are 3 cliches, in sequence, that apply here:

    1. Come the revolution, all will be better.

    2. Been there, done that.

    3. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.


    You're mechaniclally spouting nonsense you've heard from some other embittered soul . It is as if you really expect everyone else to automatically agree with your personal moral pronouncements. When you realize that isn't going to happen, you decide you're still right and the only way to fix things is violence. You're no different than that mythical plutocracy that animates your anger.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"