Slashdot Mirror


Dell Introduces Laptop With WUXGA

Cutie Pi writes "Dell has just released the Inspiron 8500, a new 15.4" widescreen notebook with a WUXGA screen--thats 1920x1200, high enough resolution to watch HDTV quality movies. Couple that with the new nVidia 64MB GeForce4 4200 Go (much faster than the ATI Radeon 9000), and you've got quite a notebook!! Can't wait to get my hands on one!"

512 comments

  1. Can you buy this today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so, Apple's "vaporware" Mini-Me 17" is in trouble!

    1. Re:Can you buy this today? by spideyct · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can place orders online today:
      http://www.dell.com/us/en/dhs/products/mod el_inspn _inspn_8500.htm

      But they show the "build time" at 25 days (compared with 5 days for an 8200).

      So yes, you can buy this today. But you probably won't have it in your hands tomorrow.

    2. Re:Can you buy this today? by Maxwell · · Score: 1

      I saw the "vaporware" 17" and the little 12" at best buy yesterday. No 25 day wait, just pick one up.

    3. Re:Can you buy this today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an empty box.

      Just punch the screen with an ice pick, you'll see!

      (/me slowly moves away...)

  2. Waiting... by moz25 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of buying an Inspiron 8200, but now I'd rather wait for a bit longer ;-) The monthly price is a funny number, btw.

    1. Re:Waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, it's hilarious. Ive never seen that number turned into a joke before!

    2. Re:Waiting... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I was thinking of buying an Inspiron 8200, but now I'd rather wait for a bit longer ;-) "

      I have an 8200 with an UXGA Ultrasharp display (1600 by 1200). Though I'd like the extra pixels, I'm not disappointed.

      Im concerned, though, that you'll find that the WUXGA screen will be a bit cramped. I have good vision and the text is VERY small for a 15" area. We have a 20" (approx) LCD Monitor here at 2048 by 1536 and the text is still too small.

      I love the number of pixels, but it can reach ludicrous proportions.

    3. Re:Waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been looking for high res external LCD monitors, but can't seem to find 15" higher than 1024x768 and 20" higher than 1200x1600. Who makes your 2048x1536 20" monitor?

  3. Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now your eyes can go bad from glare AND squinting all at the same time. With accelerated 3D.

  4. Just for movies? by lightspawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    You realize some geeks are going to use this resolution to view more text on the screen at once and lose their eyesight that much faster, don't you?

    1. Re:Just for movies? by jmv · · Score: 4, Informative

      You realize some geeks are going to use this resolution to view more text on the screen at once and lose their eyesight that much faster, don't you? ...or just to have the same amount of text, but much sharper due the the increased resolution.

    2. Re:Just for movies? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Just imagine what this could do for Nethack... larger maps!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:Just for movies? by dupper · · Score: 1
      I work at 1792 x 1344, and my prescription has actually weakened. Though I've recently started playing nethack, so:

      my eyesight probably is to ...

      as @ is to DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

    4. Re:Just for movies? by Shadowlion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...or just to have the same amount of text, but much sharper due the the increased resolution.

      It may be sharper, but it's going to be much smaller.

      My coworker bought a Dell not too long ago that has a 15.0" screen with a screen resolution of 1600x1200 (for the purposes of software development, natch). It's very hard to read at more than a few inches.

      On the other hand, I have a Gateway laptop with a 15.7" screen at its native 1280x1024. Now, I'll grant you that I can't cram the same amount of stuff on the screen as my coworker can. However, it's significantly easier to read my screen -- especially from more than a few inches -- that it is to read the screen on the other laptop.

    5. Re:Just for movies? by csguy314 · · Score: 1

      You realize some geeks are going to use this resolution to view more text on the screen at once

      Yeah, text. That's what geeks will use it for. And they read playboy just for the articles.

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    6. Re:Just for movies? by jmv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By sharper but not smaller, I mean that I can make the fonts larger (in pixels) so that the keep the same "real size". That means that there are now more pixels that define each letter, making it sharper.

    7. Re:Just for movies? by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Increase the font size on the other machine. A higher resolution gives you easier to read text. Period.

      Pushing 1600x1200, especially with Cleartype really strains your CPU though.

    8. Re:Just for movies? by Drachemorder · · Score: 1

      I have a Gateway with a 15.7" screen too, at 1280x1024, and I couldn't be happier with it. Maybe I COULD read text at a smaller size, but I certainly wouldn't be comfortable doing so. To my way of thinking, 1280x1024 is plenty of resolution for this size screen, and unless you'd going to do like Apple and make notebooks with 17" screens, I can't really see using a resolution much higher than that.

    9. Re:Just for movies? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Informative

      A font that is meant to be 10pt will be 10pt on any screen or printed on paper, unless there is an error in the software rendering it. If you use a decent OS (one that knows about this) then 10pt will be perfectly readable on one of those Dells. In any OS that uses X, you can tell X what the physical resolution of your screen is, and it will adjust the points to pixels ratio to account for the screen size. I think plug 'n' play monitors should also send this info to the computer so it can all happen automatically.

    10. Re:Just for movies? by be-fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have one of those laptops. I use KDE, and I just set X to run at 133 DPI, which is the native DPI of the screen. Fonts are *extremely* crisp, and the same size as they would be on any other display. 12pt means 12/72 (1/6) of an inch, not 12 pixels. If you set things correctly (pass the -- -dpi 133 option to X, or change the DPI setting in Windows) pretty much everything should scale just fine, and you get a huge payoff in readibility.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    11. Re:Just for movies? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Actually, browsing porn sucks on a high res display. All the images are meant for 1024x768 displays, and appear too small. Scaling just makes things ugly.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    12. Re:Just for movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      pretty much everything should scale just fine

      Fonts scale, but icons normally don't. 16x16 icons are extremely small at 133 dpi (70-80 dpi is standard for CRT monitors).

    13. Re:Just for movies? by grimarr · · Score: 1
      I, too, have an 8200, and although many programs pay attention to the DPI setting, many don't. Mozilla and Evolution are two that come to mind right away. Both of them produce text that's far too small for easy reading. I usually run at 1024x768 just to be able to read the screen without squinting.

      What makes it even more annoying is the mouse sensitivity. I use an external Logitech USB optical mouse, and it's so sensitive that moving it (extremely slowly) about 1.5 inches moves the cursor from full left to full right. Great for fast gaming, but really hard to point at the tiny icons or select tiny text. Neither Linux, X, nor KDE offer any way to lower the sensitivity. Raise it, sure, but not lower it. Grrrrr.

      (Sorry for the ranting tone -- I've wasted far too much time trying to solve these problems....)

    14. Re:Just for movies? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I don't know why Mozilla might be ignoring the DPI setting. In both RedHat 8.0 and Gentoo, it seems to be obeying it. I don't use many GTK+ apps, so I don't know what the deal is with evolution, but I do know that programs like EPSXE will obey the setting. If you can, you should try to fix these apps. Sticking to GTK 2.x and Qt 3.x applications should do that. Anti-aliasing (specially FreeType 2.1.3 and 2.1.4-rc) works *really* good with the LCD, especially if you have a nice set of fonts. I reccomend the Adobe TypeBasics collection, but the new Vera fonts and the RedHat 8.0 fonts are also pretty good.

      As for the mouse sensitivity, there might be something wrong with your XF86COnfig. I use the same setup (external Logitech Optical mouse) and my KDE mouse setting is at 5x which works fine for me. At 1x, it's quite slow. In the Input devices section, you might try switching the order of the two devices. Usually, you have the internal touchpad set as "CorePointer", and the external mouse set as "SendCoreEvents." Try reversing that. FYI, this XF86Config works fine for me (with the Dvorak thing changed).

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    15. Re:Just for movies? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Then just make the icons bigger. I have KDE set to use 32x32 icons in toolbars and 64x64 (quite big, but Noia is just so damn sexy!) icons in the file manager.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    16. Re:Just for movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope they will make it as small as they can and still see it. Until they hit there 30s like me.

    17. Re:Just for movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.suze.net will give you the hi-res you are looking for.

    18. Re:Just for movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, but only one X application will do this correctly, the rest will all do their own thing.

      Also the unbelievably dire X font rendering will make it look blockier than a lego set, whatever size it is.

    19. Re:Just for movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, only a Mac can run X.

  5. But can you buy it without paying the Windows tax? by TheMidget · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... or must we wait until Asus releases a similar Laptop?

  6. Aspect ratio of a brick... by critic666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    and weighs as much, too! 6.9 lbs w/o a media drive!! and 1.5" thick. I'll keep my TiBook (or even a new 17" AlBook), thank you very much. :)

    1. Re:Aspect ratio of a brick... by j.e.hahn · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I was very curious until I saw the size and weight. I'll "suffer" with my 1280x854 display, 1" thick and 5.5lb carrying weight.

      But, then again, I've become a brainwashed member of the apple cult, so I'm probably not the best judge of a laptop. :-)

    2. Re:Aspect ratio of a brick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it depends on what you need your laptop for.

      I agree about the thin & light notebooks being extremely handy. I owned Portege's and a Libretto before anyone had ever heard the term 1" thin.

      However, as a consultant who regularly works in a wide range of operating systems using VMware, I need workstation performance. Even if it's 1.5" thick and weights 7 lbs, it's still portable to the customer's site. I have even considered using one of the new small form factor PC cases and just carrying an LCD screen with it.

      BTW, I'm typing this on my lovely Dell C840 UXGA machine (2.2 Ghz, 1GB RAM, 1600x1200 display, internal wireless). The Dell UXGA LCD's really do look great, I imagine this new one will look good too.

  7. A great display by flikx · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a screen at that resolution, I just might be able to view an entire slashdot advertisement at once. Wow, no scrolling for me.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:A great display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ads? What ads?

      Oh, you mean the ones I don't see. That's right...

    2. Re:A great display by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's what annoys me.. Finding laptops with screens 15-16" or so that do 1600x1200 and 1920x1200 is trivial, but it's almost impossible to find a desktop flat panel that does 1600x1200 at much larger screen sizes!

      Who needs 1920x1200 on a 15" screen? yet we have to put up with 1280x1024 on 19" screens on the desktop...

    3. Re:A great display by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      Too bad it won't help with their astroturfing ad schemes

    4. Re:A great display by pkunzipper · · Score: 1

      Actuallly I use a 21" Dell ViewSonic (CRT with Sony Trinitron Technology) that I picked up cheap. Run that at 1600X1280 and your in heaven. Of course, heaven at home.

    5. Re:A great display by racermd · · Score: 1

      The issue isn't with CRTs, but with flat-panel LCD displays. Of course a good CRT like the rebranded Sony you've got will run at 1600x1200 and look good.

      I've got a 6-month-old Dell I8200 with the 15" UXGA panel on it. By definition, it will do 1600x1200. My 19" panel sitting on my desk (and most others in the stores) tend to cap at 1280x1024. The fact that they can cram a resolution of 1600x1200 into a 15" panel for the laptop and will only fit 1280x1024 into larger desktop displays seems a little backwards. As it is, I don't need to run at 1600x1200 on my small laptop screen, but I sure would like to run that on my larger desktop panel!

      Does anyone know of a decent flat-panel display for the desktop that will do 1600x1200 and not break the bank (say, under $1200)?

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    6. Re:A great display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell UltraSharp 2000FP -- anywhere from $750 to $999

    7. Re:A great display by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Does anyone know of a decent flat-panel display for the desktop that will do 1600x1200 and not break the bank (say, under $1200)?"

      As of a month ago, Dell had an UltraSharp 18' display that performed at that resolution for like $800. It disappeared off their site, though.

      P.S. There's a downside to this laptop, at 1900 by 1200 you won't be using it for dual monitor support unless you drop it down to 1600 by 1200. Doubt anybody really cares, but I do because eventually I'm going to buy an LCD screen to go with my laptop so I can have the extended desktop.

    8. Re:A great display by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Only explanation I have heard is that you usually look at the laptop-screen much closer than a desktop-screen. On desktop-screen 1600x1200 might be too small but it's not on a laptop-screen since you are physically closer to the screen.

      That said, I would like to see more 1600x1200 desktop-screens.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    9. Re:A great display by zbaron · · Score: 1

      Too true. I use a Dell UltraSharp 1900FP on the desk (sits beside a Sun 21" CRT) and it annoys the hell out of me that its stuck at 1280x1024. But if you want to part with an arm, the Apple 23" HD display is simply beautiful and Sun will sell you a 24.1" TFT for an arm, leg, kidney and some other assorted organs. Do the laptop screens really have that many pixels?

    10. Re:A great display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really nothing. You want the 22" Big Bertha monitor. I think they recently reduced the price to $8000 or so. 3840 x 2400 pixels gives it resolution greater than 200dpi (!). This is truly the monitor of the gods.

    11. Re:A great display by lingqi · · Score: 2, Informative
      dode, that's a whacky statement.

      First, let's try a SONY 23"

      Then, we have a Samsung 24"

      Of course we can't forget the Apple 23"

      All rated at 1920x1200. Now, if you want cheap, Dell makes a FP2000 at 1600x1200 (20") that can usually be gotten for under 1000. Too bad they sell out faster than hot cakes.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    12. Re:A great display by zbaron · · Score: 1

      yeah, but i don't have a gfx card with the 8 DVI outputs needed to drive it :-(

    13. Re:A great display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no need to match resolution when running dual head. The laptop could remain 1900 x 1200 while the second LCD is running a lower resolution.

    14. Re:A great display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and the response time is terrible, ain't know way you are going to do anything but look at static text and images. No 3D games, no video, it would all smear up.

    15. Re:A great display by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't understand why anyone would use a flat panel on the desktop. The cost per square foot saved doesn't come close yet to the cost of a square foot in an average home. And you can currently get 19" monitors capable of 2048x1536 for under $300. I have 3 such 19" monitors running at 1600x1200 each on my machine and can't see why anyone would settle for less. My 3 monitors + video cards cost less than a single 19" flat panel. And Ghost Recon at 2048x1536 is really cool :o)

      By the way, I've found the trick to happiness with 19" monitors at high resolution is a horizontal dot pitch of around 0.22. Anything higher causes letters to have fuzzy edges. Its this that causes eyestrain, not the size of the text. The secret to easier reading is greater sharpness, not larger size. In fact, making the size larger greatly slows the reading because there is less text in the region of sharpest focus. Most of us read at least phrases if not sentences or paragraphs, not letters and words. If you can't see a whole phrase at once in focus, you have to revert to a more primitive word by word reading pattern.

    16. Re:A great display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want a flat panel to save space, I'd want it because it is so much more comfortable to look at.

      Currently, I mostly use my laptop rather than my desktop because the display is just that much more comfortable, even though I don't consider the resolution sufficient.

    17. Re:A great display by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing until I realized that 90% of the monitors on the shelf were lying about their maximum resolution. The masks on most of them are not fine enough to support 1600x1200. You can see this by looking at the colon on the clock with a magnifying glass. If the edges of the dot are fuzzy at 1600x1200, the monitor doesn't support 1600x1200 resolution.

      The first time I bought a 19", I took it back because of this. I then set the store's computer to 1600x1200 and went to each of the monitors with a magnifier and checked them out. I found 1 out of 12 that didn't lie about it's resolution. Interestingly, it was the next to the cheapest one and supported that resolution very nicely at 75Hz.

      Since then, I've found the CRT's ease on the eyes and color correctness to be vastly better than the LCDs.

      I've also noticed that the capabilities of the CRTs have been decreasing instead of increasing at an expected rate. Also, new CRT technologies that would vastly reduce the depth of the screens do not seem to be getting pursued. I believe the manufacturers to be sabotaging them to support the myth that the LCD's are easier on the eyes (they are if the CRTs aren't made right).

      The way I see it, where everyone should have 3 or 4 times the display surface today for the same money they spent 5 years ago, instead, they are getting roped into a world of lesser pixels and smaller screens for more money. There must be a profit motive behind it, though all the manufacturer's still claim to be losing money on the LCDs. It all seems fishy.

      Another point that I should have made somewhere in this article is that the optimum resolution for human vision of light emissive displays at arms length is supposedly around 300 DPI. Apparently, this is a little lower than optimum for printed results because its emissive instead of reflective. IBM has proven in studies that increasing DPI to 300DPI does more to rest the eyes than increasing vertical refresh rates. I read somewhere that Microsoft's operating systems now support up to 480 DPI. This change happened shortly after IBM's study and I believe was prompted by it. In short, we chased the wrong solution for eye strain for many years. Vertical refresh rate isn't near as big a player as resolution as long as the persistence of the pixels is properly matched to the refresh rate.

    18. Re:A great display by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1
      Flat panels are vastly superior to CRT's:
      • Perfect geometry.
      • Perfect focus.
      • Highly reduced heat output.
      • Less desktop space used
      • Much lighter, so you don't need a really strong desk for a 21" display

      Pretty much the only downside to flatpanels are their slow response time and limited view angle, but that has improved so considerably lately that it's not really a problem anymore.
    19. Re:A great display by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      I'll give you perfect geometry though the majority of people perceive perfect geometry as concave. A slightly convex geometry is actually a better presentation for human perception because it adjusts to the fact that the edges and corners are further from your eyes than the center. If they can get to the point of creating these displays so that they are flexible, they could achieve the ultimate of a display that adjusts itself to be the same distance from your eyes no matter what point of the display you turn your head to look at.

      Perfect focus is only true if you run it at a perfect multiple of its natural resolution. I rarely see them run at that. Otherwise, interpolation has to be done which arguably isn't out of focus, but has the same smearing effect.

      I don't care about hear output. Its never been an issue for me despite working in a small room.

      The reduction in desktop space per dollar spent is not greater than the cost of the desktop space.

      And I really like strong desks. Woodworking is something I'm working on developing as a means of taking a break from programming. I'm currently planning a much bigger desk to easily accomodate more monitors and computers.

      In addition, from a simple cost per pixel and cost per square inch of presentation area, CRTs still blow away LCDs. LCDs are also still far behind in ability to correct color presentation and present colors accurately across the entire surface area of the display.

      So, all in all, I think it a promising technology for the future desktop/wall, and a perfect match for notebooks, but given all but the largest budgets, I'd still go for spending the same amount of money on multiple CRTs versus single LCDs. It makes all the difference in the world to me to be able to see several forms at once and plenty of vertical content on each when programming.

  8. 15.4" by Visaris · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wow, with it's 15.4" display, that's going to look REALLY crisp. It sounds like a great laptop display wise to me. 1600x1200 on a 15.4"? wow...

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  9. Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... What is with Dell and their ugly-ass notebooks? Fucking BODY CLADDING, ala Landau roofs on Lincolns.. They're not fooling anybody..

    Apple's got the prettiest notebooks by far, with Sony and IBM the only credible alternatives IMHO.. Dell stuff just looks like Taiwanese junk..

    1. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Taiwanese junk..
      Whuh you say 'bout my gurlfriend?!
    2. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember PowerBooks are also from Taiwan - unless you want to call them junk too.

    3. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought dell notebooks were taiwanese junk.

    4. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Kludge · · Score: 1

      The monitor is the only part of my notebook that I look at. That's why I got a Dell w/ 1600x1200. It's easy on the eyes. I find it amazing that Apple sells those gigantic display laptops w/ such crappy resolution.

      I'll never understand people who buy things for looks rather than function, especially when that thing is a computer.

    5. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "gurlfriend" is the like cheeze(tm) ?

      Does she have a 5" clit?

      I guess that's what you get when you get the Taiwanese model just off the boat instead of paying the $$$$ for the sleek Japanese model!

    6. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      I'll never understand people who buy things for looks rather than function, especially when that thing is a computer.

      Hmm.. My PBG4 is less than 6lbs, is super thin, and its titanium case can take loads of abuse.. Sounds like it serves the function of light weight and high tensile strength to me!

      Seriously though, it's comments like that which kinda make me sad, and think that geekdom won't ever really be able to make itself heard to the wider culture.. What's the function of this, or this?

    7. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

      The powerbooks (with the exception of the 15" model that specifically uses "titanium" in the product name) have an anodized aluminum alloy case rather than titanium. Rather irritating that... it's what kept me from buying one of the 12.1" ones. Disappointing as hell.

      I guess I'll just have to live with my 2.2Ghz inspiron 8200 ;-) (the special features of the 8500 are pretty cool, but it doesn't have the option for a second drive which is one of the things I like best about my 8200)

      --
      -----------------------------------------
      Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
    8. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. My PBG4 is less than 6lbs, is super thin, and its titanium case can take loads of abuse.. Sounds like it serves the function of light weight and high tensile strength to me!
      ahh, yes, sure does. apple troll.

      the titanium *part* of the case can take loads of abuse, but the plastic parts can't. the paint flaking off of yours yet?

      oh, and those tibooks ... put one on your knee and put just a *little* force on them ... not more than 5 pounds. cya gay computer!

      i think you want to say dell laptops look bad just because you've realized you got suckered into buying a laptop that was much too highly over priced.

      oh yea. did yours come with a standard 3 year warranty? bet not ... you paid extra to get the upgraded apple care. and with apple's more and more common use of POS parts, you'll need it.

    9. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      Taiwanese junk, you said?

      Ha ha ... that's funny. Who do you think make the Powerbook G4, IBM Thinkpad etc? They are all made in Taiwan by Taiwanese companies. And these days, those guys aren't just running factories either. They are tech companies in their own right.

    10. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 1

      Uhm, duh!

      The Titanium Powerbook only comes/came in a 15.2" model. The new ones you are refering to (12") are Aluminium [sic] and are advertised as such. Apple is dropping the Titanium models in favor of the new AlBooks with the iBook inspired clamshell design. These are also anodized which I don't think is possible with Titanium (not a metallurgist) and are scratch resistant. There have been many complaints about the Ti models paint scratching, though I haven't had any problems with mine (PB OC 500).

      I'm planning an upgrade to the 17" PB since I don't use my P/C desktop at all anymore.

      A couple of co-workers have older Dell laptops and they seem cheap/flimsy and are butt ugly (IMO).

      My biggest question, however, is why do you want to run HDTV on your laptop? DVDs don't support 1920... Wireless HD satellite feed to your laptop?

    11. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Yim · · Score: 1

      I agree about the cheapness of the Dell machines. They have possibly the worst assembly quality of most any mainstream laptop and have plenty of warantee issues, especially bringing it overbroad. My buddy bought one of the lower end units (inspiron 6500) with the 12" screen, and it blew its board out (I personally think it couldn't handle the 100VAC power output from Japan) and had a hell of a time trying to get it fixed, even with their warantee care package. These laptops are not globally minded in construction, and will always be subpar compared to Apple units. I have a Wallstreet II that, if it wasn't for the crappy battery life, I would use daily without issue. As for reference, I brought it to Japan and worked flawlessly for the year I was there while the Dell was down for 6 months, waiting for service to help out.

      Not even getting into their cookie cutter form factors that don't change with monitor size, the overall quality and experience was mediocre for such a seemingly esteemed company. Apple books will always be top shelf innovators and be the best. Probably why mine is valued as much as a brandy new Dell mc crapper.

      --
      -Yim
    12. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      So you'd rather have a Dell laptop made out of tacky ABS plastic than a 12"/17" powerbook made out of aerospace grade aluminium?

      Up to you I guess!

      Apple did mention they were changing the case material - from aero grade Ti to aero grade Al. One of the benefits of Al is that it isn't quite as radio opaque as Ti, and coupled with the new location of the antennas in the screen has improved airport reception.

    13. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

      I do understand, but the mystique of it BEING titanium was lost :-) Saying "my laptop's made out of TITANIUM" is far more impressive than "my laptop's made out of ALUMINUM" which in my mind is about on par with "my laptop's made out of PLASTIC".... being into kenjutsu on the side gives me very very little respect for aluminum... and for stainless steel too. They both tend to break rather easily, even "aerospace grade" aluminum is pretty weak as a sword material... I guess I'm letting my two passions cross. Maybe I shouldn't, eh? Ah well, now I'm getting a 12.1" powerbook in addition to the inspiron so yeah. (I've never noticed any problems with the quality of construction with the dell either... maybe I got lucky?)

      --
      -----------------------------------------
      Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
    14. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Heh, and I guess I've been unlucky, but then I only tend to see Windows laptops when my friends bring them to me when they're not working properly - CD drive unseated, keys breaking, etc.

      I wouldn't have thought titanium was much good for making a sword. It's hard, but its modulus is low, making it very easy to bend. Now, cobalt chrome, that would make a good sword! Good luck trying to work it though

    15. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that titanium makes a great sword material... it's that aluminum doesn't. :-) Gimme pattern welded steel any day, but yeah, "cold steel" works too... (I know of a guy who made a titanium sword, but he had to do the tempering with a special furnance that's normally used for incinerating firearms... blade sold for upwards of 15,000 dollars too)... big problem with very hard things, they tend to be either very heavy or very brittle =) I've yet to break a pattern welded katana however

      --
      -----------------------------------------
      Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
    16. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 1

      I don't see ANY reason why the Al enclosures are worse on any level. Anodized Al is almost impossible to scratch (have you ever used a PalmV?). Its not _painted_ like the Ti books, so no chipping.

      What is there not to like about it? Its improves upon the major faults of the Ti enclusure!

    17. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're ugly and look like junk.

    18. Re:Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      oh, and those tibooks ... put one on your knee and put just a *little* force on them ... not more than 5 pounds. cya gay computer!

      Sounds like that last Smell Perspiron I had, with a 166MHz MMX CPU.. Walked up a flight of stairs off the subway, tripped, put my knee into it, *crash* there goes the LCD..

      And no, Dell junk just sucks. Sorry. I've dealt with all manner of Dell equipment from personal laptops to work desktops to quad-xeons, and at every level all of their junk is worthless. Go compaq for x86 servers, IBM for laptops, and handbuilt desktops. Never ever Dell.

      Anyone who thinks a Packard-Dell is any good is a unclued jackass..

  10. Looks like a Powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This looks too much like Apple's Powerbook. And what's with that blue trimming around the keyboard? I liked the 8000-8200 Inspirons better. Why can't companies be more innovative?

    1. Re:Looks like a Powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why can't companies be more innovative?

      http://www.apple.com/powerbook/index17.html

  11. This is perfect.... by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 1

    Now I can put this puppy on my visa, divorce, and get my Nissan 350Z... Of course you realize that would be waaay too easy... :)

    --
    Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
    1. Re:This is perfect.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy with my old Inspiron 7500 - the screen looks GREAT at a mere 1400 x 1050.

      I also enjoy my Silverstone Nissan 350Z touring model. :)

    2. Re:This is perfect.... by daytrip00 · · Score: 1

      I have an Inspiron 4100 (1400x1050) and I can definitly say there is absolutley nothing good about the machine.

      I hate it with the deepest passion. It's flimsy and plastic parts are always falling off of it, the driver are crappy: the Mouse always goes haywire flying across the screen... OR it loses it and you have to pound the touchpad to get it to recognize that you are using the mouse, and support has not responded to my TWO tickets about the item. I'll buy a Thinkpad instead next time, thank you very much.

    3. Re:This is perfect.... by oingoboingo · · Score: 1

      Shame to hear about your 4100 being so crappy. I bought an Inspiron 4100 just over a year ago, and it's probably the most reliable machine I've ever owned (desktop systems included). I drag it to and from work every day, and it's been on numerous trips with me. It did have to have it's 40GB IBM Travelstar HDD replaced about 2 months ago, but Dell (Australia) sorted it out quickly, and a replacement drive was shipped out to me the next day (and was an upgraded drive from 4500rpm to 5400rpm too).

      I will admit that the actual 'feel' of the notebook isn't all that robust...you can feel the plastic flexing when you pick it up from one corner, which makes me nervous. But in actual use it's been extremely reliable.

      Are you in the US? I wonder if Dell tech support varies in quality from country to country? Also, my 4100 was built in Malaysia. Are all notebooks built in the same place? Does anyone know of variability with Dell notebooks depending on country of origin?

    4. Re:This is perfect.... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Two words: Drop test

      You're right in getting a ThinkPad. THey're built like tanks. I've done the drop tests myself, thank you very much, unintentionally, even with the second and third test :-)

      Just don't mention the "b" word

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    5. Re:This is perfect.... by 0biJon · · Score: 1
      yummy....
      my step mom got a 350Z last summer...

      It's SOOOOOOOOOOOO much fun to drive!

      --
      ?Who controls the past now, controls the future.
      Who controls the present now controls the past.?
  12. Nice laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad I still can't order it without windows.

    Sorry Dell, you're not getting my money.

  13. New Laptop from Dell? by IcyHotStuntazerlicio · · Score: 1, Funny

    Was it put together by "The Customizer"?

    1. Re:New Laptop from Dell? by dead_sell · · Score: 1

      Was it put together by "The Customizer"?
      I don't know about that, but it looks like Steven was doing a little of thw whacky weed when he designed it. Those laptops are the ugliest damn things on the face of the planet. I'll keep my iBook.

      --
      'I bent my wookie'-Ralph Wiggum
  14. Apple.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple Called... They want their laptop design from 2 years ago back.

    1. Re:Apple.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just called again to apologize for not including USB2, a real CPU, a higher resolution screen, up to 2 GB of memory, and a real video card.

    2. Re:Apple.. by 11223 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then they called again to apologize for including a SuperDrive, a battery life worth talking about, FireWire 800, and forgetting the extra thickness. Of course, you might have been talking about the Mac Portable.

    3. Re:Apple.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half of Slahdot called - they want their tired bias back.

    4. Re:Apple.. by andrewski · · Score: 1

      More like 7 years back. This thing is thick and clunky like an old Powerbook 5300!

      Ugh.

    5. Re:Apple.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They called YET AGAIN to tell you your loan didn't go through...so you can't have their products,but you can still afford...oh...i don't know...canada...

      btw,score 0 for truth,then 5 for macpropaganda...you guys just gave up trying to look unbiased, eh?

  15. Slashvertisement by macshune · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ads for nerds. Shit that we can't afford.

    1. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO. . .funniest damn thing i've read on /. in long time

  16. DVI connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When is someone besides Apple going to release a laptop with a DVI connector?

    1. Re:DVI connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When DVI actually becomes useful.

    2. Re:DVI connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. And they waste all that space with a F#%$ %!@%ing parallel port !!!!

      I havent used one of them in 10 years, but I need dvi desperately and its not even an option.

  17. specs by asv108 · · Score: 1

    As light as 6.9 pounds according to the specs, but hey it does come with some ugly facades you can stick on the back of your LCD panel. Seriously, as an owner of two dell laptops previously, they need to loose the weight fast. There is no excuse for a 7 pound 15in notebook.

    1. Re:specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is no excuse for a 7 pound 15in notebook.

      I once beat a man to death in Reno* using nothing but a Dell laptop.

      *just to watch him die

    2. Re:specs by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
      I once beat a man to death in Reno* using nothing but a Dell laptop
      Yes, yes... But did the laptop still work properly after this? :^)
  18. ok, but by ptrangerv8 · · Score: 0

    It's still a Dell....

    I'm wondering when Laptop Manafacturers will make laptops that people can put together themselves - much like we do now with desktops and servers... I would think that you buy a specific 'case' that includes a screen and keyboard, and everything else would be standardized, so you can get a mobo that you want, a proc that you want, ad nauseum... WHY HASN'T THIS HAPPENED???

    >>

    1. Re:ok, but by binarie · · Score: 0
  19. copy by stankyho · · Score: 1

    Looks like a bad copy of a 15" TiBook with some blue trim added.

    --

    ---
    eeww, I'll have a crab juice.
  20. i own an 8200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and the NVIDIA video drivers cause the machine to blue screen once/week. Dell says that this is "an ongoing issue between Dell and Microsoft". There is no driver update available.

    Dell sells a lot of stuff that's not ready for prime time - is the 8500 yet another example?

    1. Re:i own an 8200 by darken9999 · · Score: 2
      Granted that they're not the same, but I had the same problem with XP on my 8100 (Nvidia).

      Switching from the default Microsoft "Dell" to "Dell Mobile" driver stopped the constant crashing.

      Then I just said to hell with it and switched to ATI, which is installed on my Mac.

    2. Re:i own an 8200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree as far as the inspiron series goes. We have an Inspiron 8100 that's had nothing but problems. (Thankfully it's been working fine for the past several months).

      On the other hand, we have several lattitude notebooks that are rock solid. Sure one had a motherboard fry a few years ago, but Dell was here in a day to replace it. We recently bought 3 new lattitudes running WinXP and haven't had a single problem. I guess you get what you pay for.

    3. Re:i own an 8200 by Malc · · Score: 1

      I have problems with my desktop machine and nVidia drivers. I have a SMP Win2K machine with a GeForce 256 DDR - about 3 years old. Mozilla often makes it blue screen in the nVidia DLLs. Sometimes it just causes redraw problems.

    4. Re:i own an 8200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always find it wierd when people have problems with the nVidia stuff. I guess with anything there are bound to be problems but...

      I've been running nVidia hardware since the TNT days in all sorts of machines. Everything from laptops to full-blown SMP CAD machines, running everything from Windows to Linux. In all these years I've never once, not ONCE, had a problem with the nVidia hardware or drivers.

      I have a feeling some of these problems are not related to the nVidia hardware/drivers, but possibly crappy "other" hardware (motherboard, cpu, whatever).

      I mostly only buy known good quality hardware. I usually run the latest or close to the latest nVidia drivers. I only use (or have used) Win NT/2k/XP when using Windows. No problems.

    5. Re:i own an 8200 by FallLine · · Score: 1

      Hello. I have an Inspiron 8000 with GeForce2Go and I had the same problem (well mine would graphically glitch, slow to a halt very rapidly, and remain totally unresponsive, but I believe it would BSOD in 2k after an update...) for a long time until very recently (this got really bad after I ugpraded to XP from 2k and got the video drivers) despite numerous driver updates off Dell's website, turning off acceleration and other advances features, etc. You may not believe this, but I found that changing the Windows desktop theme solved all my problems. I had a fairly standard supplied theme even (though I changed the color). I switched to Windows Classic theme, looks like Win2k but not quite right...but it's faster and I've yet to crash for 2 weeks now (previously I was crashing 1-5 times a day). You may want to try it as it's so easy. I suspect this is some kind of wierd interaction with XP theme and nvidia's unified drivers.

      That said, the factory system that I had with Win2k and older drivers was perfectly stable. It's only with newer nvidia drivers and/or XP that this problem reared its head.

    6. Re:i own an 8200 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I own and Inspiron 8200 as well, and the thing has yet to blue-screen on me. Of course, this is due to the fact I run Linux, which has no blue screen. However, I used it for the first month of its life with Windows XP (it's a trauma it hasn't fully recovered from yet, no matter how much Gentoo I feed it!) and I never had a blue-screen. Ever. Maybe you should ditch the bundled drivers and D/L NVIDIA's from their website?

      The 8200 really is a great machine. Fast, ugpradable, orgasmic screen, etc. However, it's also very flimsy, hot, heavy, and sucks battery life like anything. But most desktop replacements are like that :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:i own an 8200 by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Dell sells a lot of stuff that's not ready for prime time - is the 8500 yet another example?

      Looks like it. Check out this blurb from the features page:

      The Inspiron 8500 notebook comes pre-loaded with Microsoft®Windows® XP
      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:i own an 8200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should have bought the ati 9000...mine runs great :)~

    9. Re:i own an 8200 by racermd · · Score: 1

      Granted, it's heavy. Granted, it's flimsy. Granted, it sucks battery life. But it doesn't have to be a hot-plate. I've got FanGUI keeping the built-in fans running more often (and keeping things quite a bit cooler), but it only runs in Windows. However, since this was a "simple" hack into the values that the BIOS is using and overriding them with custom values, I can't imagine that such a solution would be that difficult under Linux. Unfortunately, I'm not much of a help as I don't run Linux. Heck, I don't even "code" (as long as you don't count script-coding). But I do know that it's pretty easy once you know where to look and what to look at.

      But for a heavy, flimsy, battery sucker, it's a joy to use while on-the-go. It's a true desktop replacement machine, so don't mistake it for a lightweight system that hinders you until you're back to your powerhouse on your desk. 4+ hours of DVD watching using a 2nd battery in the removable media bay isn't that bad, especially if you're on a long commute/vacation. Besides, if you're going to be away from an AC outlet for more than 4+ hours (such as when you're in a car or on a cross-country or trans-oceanic flight), you should really have an auto/air adapter. The only thing I find lacking in this desktop replacement system is hard disk space and a decent pointing device.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    10. Re:i own an 8200 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a program called i8ktools that handles this in Linux.

      PS> I agree with you on the second part of your post. Being able to do 3D Cad homework on a flight from Atlanta to DC on battery power the whole way is just priceless.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    11. Re:i own an 8200 by RTPMatt · · Score: 1

      only once a week? hey if i could get all my windows comps down to that kind of (in)frequency, id be a happy man

    12. Re:i own an 8200 by slashhax0r · · Score: 1

      Funny my NVidia drivers work fine in X thanks!!! :P

  21. Notebook != Laptop by PseudoThink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Despite the headline, one can't really call it a "laptop", since using it on one's lap would create safety (and fertility) issues. Dell's official term is "notebook", but I believe "mobile computer", "traytop", and "portable space heater" are also acceptable. I challenge anyone to actually sit through a two-hour HD movie with this on their lap.

    1. Re:Notebook != Laptop by tomzyk · · Score: 1
      I challenge anyone to actually sit through a two-hour HD movie with this on their lap.

      Yay! More candidates for Darwin Awards!
      --
      Karma: NaN
    2. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a challenge for a "reality tv" show!

      Or better yet, it just may be "too hot for tv."

    3. Re:Notebook != Laptop by PurplePhase · · Score: 1
      How much was that prize again?

      (You didn't say the Dell had to be running/displaying the moving)


      8-PP

    4. Re:Notebook != Laptop by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1
      I challenge anyone to actually sit through a two-hour HD movie with this on their lap.
      Sir, I accept your challenge! cue sounds of sizzling lap ow ow ow ow ow!
    5. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Wee · · Score: 1
      No doubt you're right. I can barely stand my 700MHz ThinkPad A20M. I can only imagine how hot this thing gets...

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    6. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Kirby-meister · · Score: 1
      A Dell speaker came by the engineering school at my college during the first few weeks of school - according to him, they aren't laptops, but "desktop replacements."

      Right about now my 19" CRT monitor is looking mighty out-dated...I even prefer my 12.1" iBook screen because I can sit infront of it for hours on end programming away without the eye strain I get from my CRT (although I do run the CRT at 1600x1200 at 72 Hz since I really enjoy the desktop real-estate...)

    7. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Kludge · · Score: 1

      I do it with Dell's 8200, which is similar. No problem. Playing movies takes little power.

      I would not, however, recommend repeatly compiling a kernel with the thing on your lap. There is an amazing difference in the amount of power it pulls and the heat it generates when it needs too. I like that. When it sits on my desktop, I use it for encoding movies, compiling code, 3D games (LAN parties!), etc. Usually on an airplane I'm just typing into an editor or watching a movie.

    8. Re:Notebook != Laptop by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      I can not use my Powerbook G3 without a coat or pillow between it and my lap becuase of the heat. Isn't this a fairly common issue with any larger notebook?

    9. Re:Notebook != Laptop by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      Heh - beat me to it.

      I agree completely, that sounds more like "portable" computer than "laptop" computer. It probably weighs 8 pounds too. Did you see the recent Consumer Reports article on laptops? The lightest one there was about twice the weight of my soon-to-arrive Toshiba Portege.

      The other question is power. Sure, the thing will look great for an hour or so, but can it really stick through a 2.5 hour DVD? What about LotR or JFK?

    10. Re:Notebook != Laptop by AidenK · · Score: 1

      This is a common problem with pretty much every laptop. My Dell Latitude works okay on my lap until I do something that requires the hard drive to be spinning a lot.

    11. Re:Notebook != Laptop by xWeston · · Score: 1

      I have a 2.4ghz laptop (HP) that is not the p4-m. It is a normal p4 and does not get very hot.

      Other specs are 15" screen, dvd/cdrw, 60gig 5400rpm, 512 pc2100, etc etc. It doesnt get that hot. No fertility issues here and i use it on my lap for hours at a time.

    12. Re:Notebook != Laptop by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      It was -17C here the other day...I think I will try it!

    13. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Right about now my 19" CRT monitor is looking mighty out-dated...I even prefer my 12.1" iBook screen because I can sit infront of it for hours on end programming away without the eye strain I get from my CRT (although I do run the CRT at 1600x1200 at 72 Hz since I really enjoy the desktop real-estate...) Translation: Hi I'm a moron who runs a monitor at way higher resolution than it's really capable of, and then complains when I get a headache. I could get a decent 22" CRT for a fraction of the price of an iBook, but I'm too stupid to try to fix the problem.
    14. Re:Notebook != Laptop by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The thing weighs 7 pounds (less than my 8200) and no, it probably won't last through a 2.5 hour DVD. My 8200 gets about 2 hours of battery life, tops. But, can you run C&C Generals and Solid Edge (3D CAD) on your Portege?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    15. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Translation: Hi I'm a moron who runs a monitor at way higher resolution than it's really capable of, and then complains when I get a headache. I could get a decent 22" CRT for a fraction of the price of an iBook, but I'm too stupid to try to fix the problem.

      Translation: I don't know the
      or

      html tags. I don't know what model his monitor is, so he might be running it at a resolution it's capable of [translation break - 1920x1440 is the max resolution, without any registry hacks]. He could get a decent 22" CRT for a fraction of the price of an iBook, but he wouldn't get any functionality of a laptop and it would be hella heavier. I am a moron.

    16. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 1
      I challenge you to find a 2-hour HD movie for me and I'll accept your challenge.

      Oh yeah, and you'll need to buy me a, uh, new Dell laptop too. Part of the challenge, you see. :)

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    17. Re:Notebook != Laptop by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Totally agreed, the top end monitors ESPECIALLY in the United States, you lucky bastards are damn good.

      Our "max" monitor available in Australia is the Sony 520 21" (CPG? CPD? FD? - some kind of 3 or 2 letters at the start of the 520)
      It does I beleive 100hz @ 1600x1200 which is fantastic.

      The next best has identical specs, shorter tube, lower price and is better in my opinion and that's the Philips 202P, 22" (really just a 21" but marketing have had a play with the figures) and does again 100hz @ 1600x1200. - can be had for 1495$ AUD, which is like 800-900$ US

      Now, you guys in the USA (sigh) can score a "higher level" Sony and Samsung to us, these "super" models do something in the 110 or 120hz range at that res (1600) AND you pricks (ARGH I'M REALLY ANNOYED ABOUT THIS CAN YOU TELL?) can get the IIyama models at 85hz @ 2048x136 .............

      72hz @ 1600x1200 is PURE lunacy, 85hz is the minimum nowadays and I find a bigger screen effects the image even more (ie 75hz on a 14" and 75hz on a 21" - the 21" "looks worse")

      I'd reccomend a 100hz image definately, you CAN'T BEAT a CRT vs an LCD for cost, image scaling (no screwups in diff res's like LCD) etc.

      72hz @ 1600, .... and wondering why he gets eye strain - that's comedy gold.

    18. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Sony f520. It's the Best CRT there is, although I can't deal with 21" CRTs for LAN'ning.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    19. Re:Notebook != Laptop by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      True true,...........

      I'm getting a 19" Philips actually their latest "109P40" model is very high spec for a 19" - it's as good as the Sony F420 19" and it's weight / size is AMAZING for 19" of real estate.

      "short wheel base" is a good description.

    20. Re:Notebook != Laptop by haroldK · · Score: 1

      I've got one better. I was at a 50-hour trivia weekend. The second stretch I did was 24 hours in a recliner with my i8200 (still a P4m) on my lap. It didn't even get uncomfortably warm. Speedstep disabled because it was on AC and that's how I've got it set, running at 100% load the whole time (Dnet RC5 client).

    21. Re:Notebook != Laptop by spinfire · · Score: 1

      My laptop is an HP zt1000. Unless I'm compiling stuff, it stays pretty cool. I have it sitting on my lap right now, in fact, and I have in the past let it sit on bare skin without problems. I think the celeron chip in it runs a little cooler than the other HP laptops I've encountered with athlon chips. The zt1000 was a nice little unit for under $1000. However, the battery life is a little short.

    22. Re:Notebook != Laptop by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      How about some of the 24" SGI and SUN displays? some of the old 24" SGI CRT`s were very nice, expensive in their day but can be had quite cheap nowadays.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:Notebook != Laptop by slashhax0r · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that.. you are just a sissy.

  22. X/Win not Vector-based by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That resolution is barely usable because windows and X are not vector-based. With that I mean everything will scale nicely from low res to hi res. No more pixel frenzy!

  23. Laptop with WUXGA? by burgburgburg · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Penicillin used to clean up a bad case of WUXGA. Nowadays, who can say?

    OR

    You're soaking in it!

    1. Re:Laptop with WUXGA? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
      Penicillin used to clean up a bad case of WUXGA. Nowadays, who can say?

      OR

      You're soaking in it!

      Now with twice the WUXGA! It's WUXGAriffic!

    2. Re:Laptop with WUXGA? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      mmmmmm.... XUXA! Trampy Spanish kiddyshow goodness!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  24. Ram Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gotta love this gouging, under the customization look at what they charge for extra ram:

    512MB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms
    512MB,DDR,266MHz 1 Dimm [add $200.00]
    640MB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $300.00]
    768BM,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $400.00]
    1GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $650.00]
    1.5GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $1,800.00]
    2GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $3,300.00]

    1. Re:Ram Prices by spanky1 · · Score: 1

      Yep, we never buy extra RAM with Dell computers. Just get it with the minimum and go to Crucial to buy more. Dell often uses Crucial RAM in their systems anyway. Might as well buy it from the source without the huge markup.

    2. Re:Ram Prices by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Informative


      MacMall gives you 512MB RAM free.

      Of course, you have to pay the $39.99 'install fee', but look at what Dell wants for more RAM, or what it'd cost you to buy the memory from NewEgg/etc

      On a side note - $39.99 to pop the keyboard off and stick a DIMM in?!

    3. Re:Ram Prices by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      I am sure most intelligent shoppers will look at the difference in price between Dell-installed-ram and after market ram...

      Didn't you?

    4. Re:Ram Prices by dgb2n · · Score: 1

      Quick check of Crucial shows RAM costs at about
      $130 for a 512MB DIMM.

      I thinks its absolutely reasonable to charge almost $400 to install the RAM ... Uh .... nevermind. If you'll excuse me I'm going to buy more Dell stock.

    5. Re:Ram Prices by bfree · · Score: 1

      Or just speak to someone, tell them the system you want, get them to beat the web prices to get the sale, then say "I really want 512Mb of ram but your prices are so bad I'll just put in in myself, unless ..." and then they'll give it to you for something close if not equivalent or less than the market price! That's what I did and I ended up getting more and more upgrades and hardware the longer I talked, all for peanuts/respectible prices (processor jumped from 1.7GHz to 2.0GHz for EUR50 not the EUR200 from the site, and that EUR50 was to go to 1.8GHz but he whacked it up to 2GHz to get the sale). The only part I ended up upgrading from them where the price was any issue was the hard disk, but as I had no need for a second laptop drive it was cheaper to pay a little over the odds to them to get what I wanted straight up. I can only assume the sales guy didn't care after he had a sale and that he was more than willing for Dell to make next to nothing off the increased spec as long as I bought.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    6. Re:Ram Prices by yelims · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's why when I bought my Inspiron 8200 back in December, I only ordered it with 128MB, and ordered a 512MB chip from Crucial.

      My only issue was, when I was running several application, I would notice a slow down. I would get frequent messages from XP stating that it was going to resize my pagefile.

      Well, a week or so ago, I decided to check things out. Since I ordered my laptop with 128MB, Dell had set the pagefile to: minimum 128MB/maximum 384MB. Why they don't just leave it on auto is beyond me. But just be warned if you decide to go the route I went.

    7. Re:Ram Prices by oddrune · · Score: 1

      This is how it has to be.
      When Dell's prices are so low, they have to try and make money somewhere. So if people who're not so technically savvy want upgrades -- they click a bit in Dell's webshop. I don't care if Dell rip of the newbies, as long as I get cheap hardware :-)

    8. Re:Ram Prices by tupps · · Score: 1
      Remember that they have to unpack and repack the notebook, test it before and after installing the ram.

      They probably also have to cover an escalating professional indemnity insurance bill as well.

      For people who aren't sure/don't want to do it themselves then 39.99 is probably a good deal.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    9. Re:Ram Prices by nexthec · · Score: 1

      You dont want to leave it on auto, because when the swap file gets sparsley poppulated, it gets resized. This causes theavy use of the HD apparently. Not something you want to happen when on a laptpo trying to conserve power. If you've got space to spare, try setting your minimum and maximum to the same.

    10. Re:Ram Prices by haroldK · · Score: 1

      I ordered mine with 128MB for the same reason, but when I went to fiddle with mine, it was set on auto. Perhaps they changed things between June and December.

    11. Re:Ram Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I know this is coming late, but i hope i can help you with the swap file issue. The best way to set up a swap file in Windows is the same way as in UNIX and every other OS out there - give it a fixed size. This saves hard-disk thrashing during resizing, plus you get the bonus of a "real" idea of how much space you have on your disk. All my PCs have used a swap file set to 1024MB min/max (regardless of RAM) for years, and you'll find this keeps everything running very smoothly, and you're very unlikely to ever run out of memory. A gig is no big deal if your harddisk is over 10 gigs, and it's WAY worth it for the extra performance.

    12. Re:Ram Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for not reinstalling the OS as soon as you got it from an OEM.

    13. Re:Ram Prices by lingqi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a 8100 and 512M; I disable paging altogether; It's just not worth it - I mean, HD access slow things down AND drains power. I see no reason why anything I do should not fit into the 512M space (I know there are people who needs more for other stuff - but come on it's a laptop). Anything that needs more would usually use its own page file anyway (UT2k3, photoshop, etc etc).

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

  25. Not buying another one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Inspiron 7500. The 15" display went out on it 3 times with the same problem. A hugh vertical stripe through the middle. Not to mention the video card went out, and so did the keyboard.

    1. Re:Not buying another one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta quit sitting on it. It may make a good seat warmer, but that's not what it was designed for!

  26. ...you got quite a notebook. by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    ...for one hell of a price; From $2,299

    It may be me, but I would rather have a cheaper, lighter notebook with a long (8 hours or there abouts) batterylife than a HDTV+DVD-player combo with a computer attaced. But hey, each to his or her own.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:...you got quite a notebook. by praetorian_x · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "It may be me, but I would rather have a cheaper, lighter notebook with a long (8 hours or there abouts) batterylife than a HDTV+DVD-player combo with a computer attaced. But hey, each to his or her own."

      Ditto

      check out http://www.dynamism.com. Japanese laptops with a US warranty.

      The sharp MM1 looks sweet, and it doubles as a USB2 hard drive.

      Cheers,
      prat

    2. Re:...you got quite a notebook. by neoform · · Score: 1

      you ever watch a dvd then compair it to HDtv?
      dvds are lower quality then HDtv..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:...you got quite a notebook. by vasqzr · · Score: 1


      This is why Dell makes other laptops. For instance, the Latitude X200.

      Ultra Low Voltage Mobile Intel® Pentium® III processor-M 933MHz

      12.1" XGA active matrix (TFT) display

      Starting at 2.9 lbs.3 and 0.8" thin

      Up to 640MB PC133 SDRAM memory

      30GB internal hard drive

    4. Re:...you got quite a notebook. by tf23 · · Score: 1

      That'd be great, if they'd make that w/ the newer 3D chipset, make the video ram up to 128MB, and make the internal ram up to 2GB.

      That way when I take it home it could drive my 21" monitor.

      Oh, and while they're updating it, throw in the newest firewire, usb, and throw in the wireless chipset for a/b/g. Leave the parrallel and serial ports off please. If I need I'm I'll use a USB adaptor.

  27. Better be a short movie... by Chief+Typist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And what are the chances of actually being able to see the end of that HDTV movie before the battery runs down?

    Not good, I'd say...

    1. Re:Better be a short movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Nowadays, laptop batteries are meant to give you just enough time to save your work when power is down.

    2. Re:Better be a short movie... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I got my current job, it came with a Dell laptop (Inspiron 5000 series) with a DVD drive. Whee!

      On my first business trip, I found out that the battery was enough to watch about 66% of a DVD.

      Later that year, I found out that my battery was being recalled, but they'd apologize by giving me two batteries in return -- double-Whee! Now I would have enough battery life to watch a full flick.

      I just have to pop out the DVD drive to install the second battery.

    3. Re:Better be a short movie... by bfree · · Score: 1

      Well I have been able to watch DVDs no problem on my 8200 w/ATI M9 and 1600x1200 monitor (with 2 batteries though, one battery would probably do it but I wouldn't try if I was actually on the road wanting to watch a movie and get to the end). Haven't tried LOTR:FOTR Extended yet on batteries, but I think I'll have to give it a whirl just to see how far I can push it!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    4. Re:Better be a short movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      On a Mac laptop, you've got 3 minutes after you put your laptop on 'sleep' modem to switch batteries and turn the computer back on, returning to where you left off.

    5. Re:Better be a short movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has the same feature called hibernate. Works great on an old Compaq Presario 1800XL laptop running Windows XP.

    6. Re:Better be a short movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rip the dvd to your hard drive before you leave. Problem solved, and it might require less power than spinning the dvd does.

  28. GeForce4 Go, faster than what? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Informative

    much faster than the ATI Radeon 9000

    What's that? The poster must have meant the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000, which is much different from the Radeon 9000 Pro AGP card.

    1. Re:GeForce4 Go, faster than what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes of course. In the real world people are expected to pick up on this from context, but on slashdot there's always a quite significant number of idiots incapable of doing just that, which means every single thing must be spelled out explicitly, or they'll get confused and start posting nonsense.

    2. Re:GeForce4 Go, faster than what? by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I must agree.
      There are too many ppl who think that just being a part of the /. community would make them techno-wizards and obviously, this isn't the case (let alone have ANY common sense).

      Hell, the comment the gentleperson made has no correlation to whether or not the Mobility is better or worse than the GeForce4 Go with the reference they pointed to. It's just like saying "because Porche released a new car that's shaped like a Ferrari, that it's faster than a Ferrari" (it neither proves or disproves it). What would it be if Porche's new car was a luxury minivan?

      Besides, ATi is known for good hardware and low power consumption for their notebook gpus while Nvidia as a whole is known for good driver support and high power consumption.

      Just a few cents.

    3. Re:GeForce4 Go, faster than what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The mobility radeon 9000 is over 6 months old, and is actually a true notebook chip designed for low power consumption.

      The GF4 4200 go is simply the desktop chip with lowered clockspeeds. It's comparable to the Geforce FX, puts out way too much heat for the application, and introduced just for the purpose of taking the performance lead from a 6 month old design from ATI. I'm surprised that someone actually used this chip...

      In a matter of days, ATI will release the M10, and nVidia will release nv31, both of which will offer better performance, support for directx 9.0 and have much lower power consumption...

      Anyone who buys this will be stuck with a battery draining, hot running card that held the performance lead for a total of 1 month before superior designs appeared

  29. my dell.. by MousePotato · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought an Inspiron 7500 when the PIII 500 chips were first made available in laptops. It has been a few years now and this machine has been all over the US, banged up, dropped, kicked, etc. at jobsites, conventions & seminars. The only thing that has gone wrong with it have been the CD burning out playing CTP and the 'm' key jumping off. I hope the new line can stand up to the kind of abuse this one has because this machine is still kickin and I would certainly consider buying another one in the future.

    1. Re:my dell.. by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has an Inspiron... 4000, I think. Almost every time it gets knocked (falls half a foot) the case gets dislodged. He's had to have the repair guy over several times (hooray for on-site service) just to fix what should be minor issues - though the guy always tells my friend that the case is 'supposed to be like that'. It's not supposed to, they just designed it poorly. Every time I use his backspace key too, it makes a rather annoying sound, since the keyboard is not, and refuses to stay, properly fastened down.

      Dell once rocked, but they've gone increasingly downhill. Desktops are fine, but I don't trust the Inspirons (based on his) any more than I trust Vaio laptops based on his old one (on which several keys stop working, the battery refuses to charge, the hard drive makes funny noises, etc). Still, the Inspiron is a great deal, and the Vaio is a simply beautiful piece of work. Too bad.

      --Dan

    2. Re:my dell.. by Trejus · · Score: 1

      You must be a lucky one. I got a Inspiron 3700 probably at the same time as yours. Mine's been home a few times, in the library twice. My case is cracked. My LCD has been replaced and needs to be replaced again. My fan died once. I'm on my third battery. The floppy drive doesn't work. I've gotten about 4 ethernet cards. The keyboard doesn't register keystrokes all the time. The mouse occasionally wanders off. The sound card sounds terrible under windows(?!). And the processor fried once.

      I guess it really depends on the luck of the draw and which outsourcing company actually made your laptop. I was happy with the warranty service, so I was thinking about sticking with dell, but then the LCD on my dad's Inspiron 4000 died. Needless to say i'm looking else where for my new laptop.

      --
      "To save the planet, I had to go to the worst spot on Earth, and that was Philadelphia." -- Sun Ra
  30. If I had to do it all over again... by ilsie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would definitely go thin and light. I bought the most powerful, largest screened laptop I could find (at the time). However, it's so unweildy, and drains battery power like nothing else. If I'm lucky (with two batteries in it) I'll be able to surf for 1 hour before it goes dead. Plus, by the amount of heat it generates, I know I'm going to have lap cancer by age 35.

    In other words, I cant do a whole lot with it, and it's really heavy and awkward. My dad on the other hand, has a super small Sony Vaio that can go about 6 hours on a battery and still do everything I do, even though it's more underpowered.

    1. Re:If I had to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My boss has a "thin and light" laptop, and while it travels nice, because it does not have a built-in CD-ROM, it is extremely dorky to set up to use a CD. Plus, the external CDROM is only a 4x or something lame.

      To each his own, I guess.

    2. Re:If I had to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, by the amount of heat it generates, I know I'm going to have lap cancer by age 35.

      Yes, because as we all know, heat causes cancer.

    3. Re:If I had to do it all over again... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      You should have bought a PowerBook. Giant screen, built in DVD burner, but the battery life is still more than sufficient to watch a 2-1/2 hour movie on the plane. And a hell of a lot better than that if you aren't spinning the optical drive the whole time. I'm an iBook man myself, but a good friend has loaned me his PowerBook on many occasions. Six hours of battery life isn't unusual if you're doing light tasks like word processing with the hard drive spun down most of the time and the AirPort card turned off.

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:If I had to do it all over again... by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah I bought the Dell Inspiron 2100 2 years back now (think they have renamed it now). No internal drives, so if I want to install anything I need the external drive or some USB. But a touch-pad, near full-sized key board, 12.1" screen. Serves the purpose for working while commuting, I get about 2 hours battery life out of each. Perfect for my public transport trip of 1 hour each way.

      Plus it sits nicely into my little flip-book diary/organiser case so no need for a carry bag.

  31. Alienware by suhit · · Score: 1

    I still prefer the Area-51 laptops by Alienware. A little more pricey, but damn, they put a lot of horsepower in there; perfect for LAN parties. And they are colorful as hell :).

    Review is also very nice, though it is off of their own site. Customize your own here.

    Suhit

    1. Re:Alienware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great choice of OSs

    2. Re:Alienware by bafu · · Score: 1

      If you like those, but not the price, you should check out the Sager's. Look familiar? ;-) Some vendors will even sell them in the "pretty colors". Looks like one of the vendors has started a forum for discussions about the platform.

      Someone had a pretty detailed review of his purchase of his Sager from one of the vendors, but that page seems to be unavailable at the moment. Here's the Google cache of it, tho.

      Anyway, I don't have the dosh to be a customer, happy or otherwise, so consider this more of an FYI than a recommendation... ;-)

    3. Re:Alienware by secretasianman999 · · Score: 1

      The thing about Alienware is that while their website is pretty, it's really tough to navigate. A month ago (before buying my Ti Powerbook at steep NYU student discount), I seriously considered getting an Alienware laptop.

      The thing is heavy as hell to begin with... (like 10lbs!) and has no battery life. It's like a portable computer (popularized in the late 1980s--- remember the Atari STacey?).

      The fact that they don't have an "budget" models anymore (they had some configs well under 2k a few weeks ago) really bugged the hell out of me.

  32. Seems heavy by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I know from carrying around my laptop that weight matters alot. This laptop seems somewhat heavy for its size

    Inspirotion 15.4-inch Wide-Aspect SXGA+ and 15.4-inch Wide-Aspect UXGA display
    Height: 1.52-inch (38.6 mm)
    Width: 14.22-inch (361.2 mm)
    Depth: 10.87-inch (276.1 mm)
    Weight: 6.9 lbs. (2.96 kg) with travel module, battery and Harddrive. (Specs)

    Compared to the PowerBook G4 (17" model)
    Height: 1.0 inch (2.6 cm)
    Width: 15.4 inches (39.2 cm)
    Depth: 10.2 inches (25.9 cm)
    Weight: 6.8 pounds (3.1 kg) with battery and optical drive installed.

    It seems that if Apple can make a laptop with a 17" screen that is 6.8lbs, Dell should be at least be able to get one that is lighter. (Specs)

    1. Re:Seems heavy by ostiguy · · Score: 1

      The Apple screen is much much lower resolution -1440x900, so it is less complex, and probably weighs less. Still, you say that the apple is only a tenth of a pound lighter. So whats the problem?

      ostiguy

    2. Re:Seems heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah ! But the it is not going to be cheaper.

    3. Re:Seems heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, cept your metric conversion isn't correct:

      6.9 lbs = 3.13 kg
      6.8 lbs = 3.08 kg

    4. Re:Seems heavy by Zaak · · Score: 1

      Dell should be at least be able to get one that is lighter.

      Because Dell has access to secret materials that defy the laws of physics which aren't available to Apple?

      I'm actually surprised that the two laptops weigh almost exactly the same. I'm a little disappointed that Dell's isn't thinner, but I imagine they're keeping costs down by using plastic rather than metal like the Apple laptop.

      TTFN

    5. Re:Seems heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... no? Both screens are almost certainly made from the same thickness substrate, so while the higher resolution display is 'more complex' (more active elements), they probably have almost identical weights... per square inch. And of course, the Apple display is significantly larger, in terms of area.

    6. Re:Seems heavy by pi+radians · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously trying to say that more pixels will make a laptop heavier?

      I think the original poster is trying to say that since Apple can make a 17" laptop light, Dell should be able to make their 15.2" one lighter (especially without a optical drive).

      Dell, the leader in PC market share can't make a laptop as well designed as Apple's, thats the point.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    7. Re:Seems heavy by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Actually, what you're seeing is the difference between PPC and X86 processor architecture.

      PPC chips are small and run significantly cooler than their X86 counterparts, so you can make smaller, lighter laptops with better battery life. This is pretty much the main reason that Apple is still competetive in Notebooks where size, weight, and battery life are more important than raw processor power.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    8. Re:Seems heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems like they're doing some funny math here...
      Apple: 6.8 pounds (3.1 kg)
      Dell: 6.9 lbs. (2.96 kg)

      Last time I checked, 1 kg = 2.2 lb

      so 6.8 lbs = 3.09 kg
      6.9 lbs = 3.13 kg

      peculiar...

    9. Re:Seems heavy by gotjanx · · Score: 1

      Wow! When did 6.9 lbs become 2.96kg ?? Couldn't one make out a case of deliberately misleading consumers? No wonder its as light as 6.9lbs ...2.9 kgs is not bag for a 3.1 kg laptop

    10. Re:Seems heavy by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      Also note that the Powerbook is usable for movie viewing at the weight listed. The Dell has it's optical drive out. In my experience, the combo drives add about 3/4 of a pound to the overall weight.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    11. Re:Seems heavy by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      About the only significant difference I see is the resolution - the Dell screen, while smaller, has a resolution of 1920x1200. The Apple screen is "only" 1440x900. This is a signficant difference in resolutions, and may partially explain the weight difference. More likely, though, it's simply case materials.

      Of course, the Apple PowerBook G4 17" is $3299. Base (which includes a lot). A comparably configured Dell Inspiron 8500 (upgrade HD to 60GB, video to GF4Go, WUXGA video, 2 GHz CPU) is only $2657. And the Dell has a faster CPU (the 1 GHz G4 isn't going to beat a 2 GHz P4M in most tasks), more resolution (albeit a smaller screen), and a much, much longer standard warranty (3 years vs 1 year).

      Oh, and yes, the Inspiron 8500 has 802.11b/g, standard. I don't think it has Bluetooth (the Powerbook does), but both have Gigabit ethernet and built-in modems. Both have CD-RW/DVD-R's, and half a gig of memory (upgradable on both). They're really pretty comparable as far as hardware goes. Which software you prefer is obviously up to you.

      The Apple is lighter and (mostly) smaller. About the biggest difference is the height - 1" vs 1.5" is pretty major. The Apple is an inch wider, but that's probably not a big deal to most people.

    12. Re:Seems heavy by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The Dell Laptop is weighed with the "travel module"-- that is, without a DVD/CD drive. The Apple drive is non removable.

      I'm not sure why WXGA is so desirable in a laptop with a 15" screen. Perhaps some people have fantasies of watching HDTV content on a airplane, but it's not entirely clear how such content will get on to the laptop in the first place-- as, IIRC, there's no HD-DVD.

      I suppose wou coulld copy a few gigs recorded on a desktop computer with a WinTV-Digital card, but it's still rather messy. Still, it's probably more practical than loading an DVS deck onto the airplane.

    13. Re:Seems heavy by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      The Dell has a CD-RW/DVD-R standard, just like the Apple does.

      Dell, the leader in PC market share can't make a laptop as well designed as Apple's, thats the point

      Only if you ignore the real specs. I suggest reading my other post on the thread - the two are very comparable, but the Dell is about 20% less expensive.

    14. Re:Seems heavy by Cheesemaker · · Score: 1

      It may be a tenth of a pound lighter, but it's also a tenth of a kilogram heavier, for some reason? Stupid conversions....

    15. Re:Seems heavy by Atzanteol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dell: Weight: 6.9 lbs. (2.96 kg) with travel module, battery and Harddrive.

      Apple: Weight: 6.8 pounds (3.1 kg) with battery and optical drive installed.

      Interesting trick. The Apple weighs more if you use metric measurements!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    16. Re:Seems heavy by pi+radians · · Score: 1

      Only if you ignore the real specs. I suggest reading my other post on the thread - the two are very comparable, but the Dell is about 20% less expensive.

      Hey, I'm not trying to argue specs for specs (I've given up that long ago). I was just pointing out that the largest PC manufacturer is still trying to catch up with Apple (in terms of design).

      I had to give up my ThinkPad a little while ago, and would love a lighter version of this laptop. I don't think I'll ever toss down the 5 grand for a TiBook, so the only thing holding me back on this laptop is weight and battery life.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    17. Re:Seems heavy by shayborg · · Score: 1

      Both have CD-RW/DVD-R's, and half a gig of memory (upgradable on both).

      Actually, the Dell doesn't have a DVD writer, even as an option.

      -- shayborg

    18. Re:Seems heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would imagine that apple uses metal to dissipate the heat... titanium is particularly poor at that task, which is my guess for why they switched to that for the new models, and it costs less.

      the dell has more airspace inside, and probably can actually be used ON the lap. if they needed serious cooling power, they'd go with metal cases as well, they haven't, so... apples lately run too hot. i couldn't even comfortably type on a 12 inch power book without my left hand cooking; the bottom of that case was scorching. too hot.

      a 17 inch wide laptop doesn't fit most backpacks or laptop luggage very well. the dell does.

      what's with this thickness fascination anyway? 1/2 inch isn't a big deal, when 90% of the time, the machine is open, and being used.

    19. Re:Seems heavy by jokell82 · · Score: 1
      Can you show me where the DVD-R is on that Dell? I couldn't configure it...

      Also, you can't really compare the prices when you have XP Home edition selected as the OS. In no way does that compare to OS X. XP Pro might be a little closer, but not much.

      Also, how about iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD, where are they on the Dell? Oh wait, I forgot, they're Mac only.

      Pricing out the computers, I don't get huge differences. And if you price out the 15" (which compares a little better to the Dell), the Apple ends up being cheaper. And besides, you'll have to wait until 4/10 for the Dell to ship. Some people are reporting the 17" PowerBooks shipping now...

      --
      I dunno who it is
      but it prolly is fhqwhgads.
    20. Re:Seems heavy by jokell82 · · Score: 1

      Interesting that the PowerBook has a 17" screen and still manages to be lighter than Dell's 15"...

      --
      I dunno who it is
      but it prolly is fhqwhgads.
    21. Re:Seems heavy by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
      That's because Dell did the "divide by 2.2046" on a Intel machine :-)

      Those of us from Canada know our Metric to Imperial conversions, you hosers!

      6.8lbs ~= 3.09kg 6.9lbs ~= 3.13kg

    22. Re:Seems heavy by john82 · · Score: 1

      I find the entire anti-Apple crap from Dell laughable. Michael Dell repeatedly tries to convince a gullible public that Apple is dead (and lately, that tired horse they rode in on, OSX). Still, it's innovation(TM)* when Dell follows Apple's lead.

      News flash: The king isn't wearing the latest fasion. He's naked and no one has the guts to say it.

      * Innovation is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation.

    23. Re:Seems heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not exactly sure what metrics they are using, but if 6.9lbs > 6.8lbs (which no one can disagree with)... look at the SI units. The Dell notebook is lighter by 0.14kg. Somehow when travelling outside the US the Dell loses some mass... perhaps to look better on the nude beaches?

    24. Re:Seems heavy by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny
      The Apple weighs more if you use metric measurements!

      Soooo....., the possibilities are narrowed. Fired NASA engineers either go to work for Apple, or Dell.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    25. Re:Seems heavy by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I think this calls into question the entire validity of the reported weights though. What if the PowerBoo was originally weighed in kg, whereas the Dell machine was originally weighed in lbs? Somebody is not converting properly, and it can only be known which is which if one knows what units the original measurement is in.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    26. Re:Seems heavy by rgraham · · Score: 1

      And don't forget you're comparing a ~15" laptop (Dell) to a ~17" laptop (Apple). The ~15" Apple PowerBook weights 5.4lbs (2.4 kg).

    27. Re:Seems heavy by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Can you show me where the DVD-R is on that Dell? I couldn't configure it

      Yes, I misread that on the Dell site.

      Also, you can't really compare the prices when you have XP Home edition selected as the OS

      Exactly what features do you need from Pro over Home? In a laptop?

      As far as which is preferred (OS X or XP), I said, quite explicitly, that that was a personal preference.

      Also, how about iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD, where are they on the Dell

      Dell does bundle music and photo toys. Movie creation tools are available for an additional $49. I doubt they're on the level of the iTools (which, by all accounts, are exception pieces of software), but it's something. Again, I said software was personal preference. Or do you really, really want to get into the long list of software that simply isn't available on the Mac?

      Pricing out the computers, I don't get huge differences. And if you price out the 15" (which compares a little better to the Dell), the Apple ends up being cheaper

      No it isn't. First off, the 15" Apple has a meager 1280x854 resolution. The Dell 15.4", even with an SXGA screen, is 1680x1050. The Apple is $300 more expensive once you include 3 years of warranty protection (which I didn't do with the Dell vs 17" Powerbook example). The Apple has a longer battery life, the Dell is more powerful. Pick what you need.

      If you like Macs, then get a Powerbook. Otherwise the Dell is a very nice option... either way you're going to spend one helluva lot of money on a system.

      The original poster, however, compared a 17" Powerbook to the Dell and wondered why the Dell was (slightly) heavier. I wondered too. I also wondered about cost. If cost wasn't an issue, I'd probably go with the Powerbook, even though it has slightly lower resolution. The longer battery life and larger screen would cinch it. The reduced CPU power isn't a big deal, since I'm not likely to do anything CPU constrained on a laptop, and a 1 GHz G4 isn't a wimpy CPU anyway.

    28. Re:Seems heavy by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      What I was noticing was that if you compare 'lbs', the Dell laptop was heavier. BUT if you compare by kg, the Apple laptop was heavier!

      Somebody doesn't know how to convert lbs->kg properly...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    29. Re:Seems heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting trick, you are comparing the 17" powerbook to the 15" dell. hmmm

    30. Re:Seems heavy by slashhax0r · · Score: 1

      Umm. Think about it. The material of an LCD panel is pretty lightweight stuff. We're not talking CRTs here.. My Inspiron 8200 is well built, all this whining about heavy unwieldly heat producing laptops makes me sick! Ever heard of the osbourne? Here's a machine that weighed like 30 pounds and had a *TINY* green and black crt.. :) My dell is a godsend. I also get 3 hours with the p4 1.8 and their new li-on battery

  33. The news is the screen... by ites · · Score: 1

    Where notebooks go, desktop screens follow. This indicates that within a year, WXSXGA (or whatever that excessive i've-got-yet-a-longer-TLA word was) LCD screens will be priced to sell, and this is the final nail in the coffin of those 21" monsters sitting around our offices.
    If this notebook sounds heavy, just consider the weight of the alternatives. Personally, though, I'm happier than a bishop in amsterdam with my ASUS. Three thumbs up.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:The news is the screen... by Mignon · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'm happier than a bishop in amsterdam with my ASUS. Three thumbs up.

      Damn, I have to do something about this dyslexia. I thought you said "I'm happier than a bishop in amsterdam with three thumbs up my ASS."

      It's going to be a while before I forget that thought.

    2. Re:The news is the screen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where notebooks go, desktop screens follow.


      Yeah, I can still remember the day I brought home my first laptop with its 19" Trinitron CRT. It wasn't until a year or so later, after multiple back surgeries, that I was finally able to get one of those for my desktop.

  34. 1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    geez, I've got a 16.1" screen on my Sony Vaio laptop, and the native resolution on that is 1600x1200. I couldn't imagine a _smaller_ screen with a higher resolution. Would make reading anything with a font size below 16pt impossible I'd assume. I can barely cope with 12pt on the 1600x1200 16.1" screen.

    1. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      16pt is the same size on any screen.

    2. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. How about giving us resolution-independent GUIs. Let me take that 1900x1200 pixel display and use it to display 1-inch high 72 point letters at 144 DPI.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    3. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by b-baggins · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's not true. Windows GUI elements are tied to 96 PPI. If your screen resolution goes up to 144 DPI, then all your 16-pt fonts are now half again smaller.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    4. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The higher resolution would make small type easier to read because it would be displayed better/crisper.

    5. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by Malc · · Score: 1

      That's an issue with Windows then. 1 point is by definition 1/72nd of an inch, or something like that. If changing the DPI changes the height of a 16 point character, then Windows isn't rendering it properly.

    6. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      You're right. Points are based on the assumption you're displaying at 72dpi.

      However, many graphics subsystems (even Apple's) run at higher dpi settings these days...meaning that you often don't get true WYSIWYG.

      -psy

    7. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      many graphics subsystems (even Apple's) run at higher dpi settings these days

      An especially frustrating example, since Display PDF, nee Display Postscript is supposed to be resolution independent!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      Just right click->Properties->settings->advanced->display->DP I Setting->custom setting... at that point you can set it too anything you want. You can make that 12 point font an inch high if you so desire. At the least, you should make it 12 points high by putting a ruler up to the displayed ruler and adjusting it to match. This fixes everything but the icons and title bars, but they don't matter as much anyway.

    9. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a problem with shitty software. But it doesn't change that fact that a point is 1/72 inches.

  35. Too many pixels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish someone would make a 1600x1200 laptop.
    That way I could run it at 800x600 without losing screen realestate or getting bad jaggies.

    1. Re:Too many pixels by jantheman · · Score: 1

      Been around a long time:

      IBM A21(p) - which was nice - & now A31(p) which is nicer tyvm.

      --
      -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
  36. Going to look darned silly by LiftOp · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...with the wire going to my HDTV antenna.

    Maybe I can get a headband-mount for it, that'll get the chicks to come a-runnin'.

    1. Re:Going to look darned silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that'll get the chicks to come a-runnin'

      They'll be runnin', dude, but they won't be coming...

    2. Re:Going to look darned silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What extra electronics would be needed to receive and display HDTV broadcasts?? I mean... come on.... with all the horse power in today's laptops, you'd think that FM, VHF, UHF, and HDTV reception would be a no brainer.
      I realize there needs to be some signal reception equipment.... but hey.... it's not that hard.

  37. Dell accessories by Virtex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet, a new computer from Dell. Does it come with a free sample of Marijuana? Dude, you're gettin' some weed!

    Ok, that's just cruel.

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    1. Re:Dell accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dell kid used to say "Dude, you're gettin' a Dell!", and then in real life he got busted for having marijuana and what you did here was COMBINE the two into something positively outrageously funny! Or lame, I think I mean lame.

    2. Re:Dell accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or "Dude, you're getting a CELL!"

    3. Re:Dell accessories by Slack-Jawed+Local · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean, "Dude, you're getting a cell!".

    4. Re:Dell accessories by gvonk · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, no. Come on. We all know that marijuana is a gateway drug...

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    5. Re:Dell accessories by iankerickson · · Score: 1
      No, no, no. Come on. We all know that marijuana is a gateway drug...


      That explains their CEO.


      And the cow.

      --
      Democracy. Whiskey. Sexy. Pick any two.
  38. or a VPR 200A5 for that matter by sporkboy · · Score: 1, Informative

    if you're not into the whole mac thing

  39. Resolution in Games by Kaypro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having never used a widescreen aspect ratio screen I was curious as to how games handle these odd resolutions. Do they actually recognize and adjust for the aspect ratio or simply default to the highest available 3:4 setting which means the graphics start to blur? Anyone know?

    1. Re:Resolution in Games by Exitthree · · Score: 1

      It depends on the game. Some games (like Quake3) allow you to set custom widescreen resolutions. Others just stick the largest 4:3 ratio box in the middle of the screen and have black bars on the sides.

    2. Re:Resolution in Games by ianscot · · Score: 1
      On a 17" 1440x900 Mac, companies have basically released baby updates to add the new resolution. Most games do support it -- anyway all the five or six my kids like. (And Civ III that I like.)

      Haven't yet seen anything that wouldn't run on the first double-click, anyway.

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    3. Re:Resolution in Games by tbmaddux · · Score: 5, Informative
      Having never used a widescreen aspect ratio screen I was curious as to how games handle these odd resolutions.
      Depends on the game, the screen, and the OS.

      Some support the native resolution (for example, I can play Civ III or Warcraft III on my 17" FP iMac in 1440x900). This is fantastic.

      Some will keep the screen at native resolution and give you bars on the borders (for example, a 1024x768 box inside my 1440x900 screen). This isn't so bad. Also not so bad is linearly downscaling the screen a little bit -- it's not as blurry as you might think, at least not for me in MacOS X -- displaying an 800x600 box inside a 1024x640 screen, for example.

      What's annoying is when the game runs fullscreen in a 4:3 resolution and stretches it. This is what Diablo II / LOD does, so it smears 800x600 out laterally to fill the screen. The OS refers to this as a "stretched" resolution and it looks awful. I play this game in windowed mode and reduce my resolution so that it is a window that nearly fills the screen, with my desktop peeking out the sides. Better.

      Nearly all the flat panels I see nowadays are in strange resolutions or aspect ratios (my 17" studio display is 5:4 while my iMac is 8:5), and the persistence of companies that continue to try to slap a new acronym on it like FUGA or BARGA is laughable. Just publish the dimensions and resolution, please.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    4. Re:Resolution in Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the 5 or 6 available for the mac, right?

    5. Re:Resolution in Games by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      What does 1024x640? :)

    6. Re:Resolution in Games by tbmaddux · · Score: 1
      What does 1024x640? :)
      The 17" flat panel iMac. Check the specs. It is 1440x900 native, and also does lower resolutions at both 8:5 (1.6:1) and 4:3 (1.33:1, both "stretched and with black bars on the sides) aspect ratios.
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  40. It's good to see Dell bucking the trends... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1


    It's nice to see that with everyone coming out with smaller and lighter laptops, Dell had decided to go bigger and heavier. Hey, it worked for SUVs... Personally I wouldn't give my (okay, my company's) Thinkpad X23 up for that.

    Seriously, does the new fangled WUXGA screen make that much of a difference? Is it that much heavier? Or have Dells always been this porky?

    And if you buy one of these, from the low cost of $2299, do you at least get a Windows XP CD? Or are they still foisting that recovery partition crap on people? (Altho that really is Microsoft's fault)...

    1. Re:It's good to see Dell bucking the trends... by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

      Or have Dells always been this porky?

      Yes. However the quality of the machine and the quality of the support make up for this in my mind. Dell's much more willing to talk to me when I have questions about the machine than Sony was about my Vaio....

      do you at least get a Windows XP CD?

      Yes, you do. Dell's generally speaking been way better about this than most other manufacturers. More than that, if you have to format/reinstall when booting from that CD, you don't have to enter a product key (assuming you're installing on the same/a similar Dell) or even activate XP, it's pre-activated. Be warned this does not mean you can go to your friend Joe's house and randomly install a cd-key-less and pre-activated copy of XP on his whitebox PC. Doesn't work that way, it checks for a particular manufacturer's signature in the bios. Still, remarkably convenient for legit reinstalls.

      --
      -----------------------------------------
      Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
  41. Neat and cool, but . . . by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a neat laptop, and I'm sure it would make a great desktop replacement, or even a good gaming laptop. That said, though, I can't bring myself to buy another Dell machine until they re-earn my trust.

    The short version of the story is that I bought a laptop from them and tried to get it fixed under warranty. They failed to fix all of the problems when I sent it back, and failed to note the problems as unfixed. When I got it back, outside of warranty, with the problems unfixed, I called Dell, and Dell refused to fix them, saying that it was out of warranty. They did, however, fix the problems they caused while it was being repaired. When I got it back from the second repair, there was an additional problem, a cracked access panel. It took a good half-hour of arguing to get them to replace the panel. I did finally get them to fix the original problem, but it took a sternly-worded letter to senior management to make it happen. That letter details several of the problems I've had with Dell over the years; it also contains the full version of this story.

    Short answer is that I have lost my faith in Dell, and until they prove themselves to me again, I won't buy their products, and I advise other people to do the same, no matter now nifty-cool they may be.

    --
    Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    1. Re:Neat and cool, but . . . by spicyjeff · · Score: 1

      It's not that they are "nifty-cool", in fact they actually kinda hick.

      But they are cheap. That's why they are in business.

    2. Re:Neat and cool, but . . . by fliplap · · Score: 1

      I too had this problem with Dell, which is a common problem with my model and models similar to it. It seems the onboard NIC is extremely prone to failure in the L400 and Inspiron 2000/2100. The first time i sent it in they claimed they couldn't find a problem with the PCMCIA nic, which odd since i hadn't sent a PCMCIA nic or made any claims about the PCMCIA slot, so I sent it back, and they replaced the board. This happened 2 more times. On the 3rd time it was roughly 3 weeks before the warrenty ended. So I called, they sent a guy to pick it up. A week later I haven't heard from them, so I called.

      Tech support insisted I ABUSED the network port. I tried to explain how insane that sounded, but they kept telling me to call this other number, to the department that does the repairs. Which I did, multiple times, no one ever picked up and I left at least 4 messages. No one returned my callsd. Two weeks later, out of warrenty, I get my laptop back, unrepaired. Thats just BAD customer relations.

    3. Re:Neat and cool, but . . . by Baki · · Score: 1

      What disturbed me about Dell (Switzerland) is that in this country there is no right whatsoever to send back if you don't like the product.

      Since there is no shop/showroom where you can look at the product in advance, this is an inacceptible policy for me. Yes I would be prepared to pay the shipping costs in such a case, but even under that condition you have no such right in Switzerland.

      In the rest of Europe you have a legal right to do so, and in the US the consumers are demanding enough to enforce a return policy. Only the stupid Swiss consumers are so 'easy' that they let them selves be ripped off and order without any guarantee, grrr.

    4. Re:Neat and cool, but . . . by JBhoy · · Score: 1

      I had this same problem with dell with an Inspiron 7000

      I'm inclined to think that certain Dell laptop designs are prone to overheating, and this screws them up in various ways.

      I'm not going to buy Dell again anytime soon.

    5. Re:Neat and cool, but . . . by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I can't say I've had any real problems with my Inspiron 8000 since I bought it (22 months). Its held up very well under heavy use and so-so treatment. OTOH I had a hellish time getting Dell to make a minor billing change when I bought the thing. They actually wanted me to refuse delivery and reorder just to change credit cards (I finally got them to just run the switch on their side but it was torture).

      Dell used to be #1 for service. While they still make a good product and I'd buy from them again they aren't the service kings by a long shot.

  42. R U Apple's bitch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple could take a shit on a piece of shit and you'd probably think it looks great. Go pimp your apple crap somewhere else...

  43. Re:the big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean if he notices and after he stops laughing?

  44. 2000+ dpi resolutions by wbtittle · · Score: 1

    My next door neighbor bought a dell laptop for his wife's boss. It had a 14" screen, but it also had a default resolution that was greater than 2000 horizontal. I have yet to see such a resolution on an lcd since.

    The image quality was amazing.

    Has anyone else seen this. My neighbor was amazed since he hadn't ordered the high end screen.

    So were we dreaming, or has anyone else seen this?

    brad

    --
    God: "I don't leave footprints!"
    1. Re:2000+ dpi resolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My next door neighbor bought a dell laptop for his wife's boss.

      Maybe your next door neighbor's wife should just work harder. Wouldn't that be a cheaper way to get ahead?

  45. Re:But can you buy it without paying the Windows t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ASUS got out of their laptop manufacturing. They will build OEM units to some smaller guys now.

  46. WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter by blenderfish · · Score: 2, Informative

    WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter

    That's a lot of adjectives, and a whole lot
    of pixel lovin'.

    1. Re:WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which brings us to a good point: Why the fuck are we still using this naming system (answer to retorical question: marketing idiots)? How many people would know what size a WUXGA screen is? I wish they would just list the resolution--1920x1200--and be done with it.
      Unfortutaly, in 3 years time, we will probably be seeing screen with XWDSUXGA (Extra-wide Double Super Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter) etc.

    2. Re:WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      Dell introduces laptop with 2.3 Megapixel display.

      or my favorite: Dell introduces laptop with really wide display. This works best if you picture salesperson with outstretched arms.

  47. Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a screen that big and a video card that powerful, imagine the battery life that you'l

  48. Please... by SymLink-Dyn · · Score: 1

    Can someone spend more than 10 secs looking at story submissions to make sure that they're not just (very) thinly disguised ads? That'd be quite an improvement!! Can't wait to get my hands on it!

  49. LATITUDE ? by Brigadier · · Score: 1



    We just purchased 6 Dell Latitudes where I work for field work (architectural). We chose them after much research on durability, continuity, stability. So far they are doing a very good job. It would be nice to see this display adopted into the Latitude series. For someone who does graphics, animation, CAD, etc this would serve as excellent work at home or field systems. Funny enough the reason we didn't choose an I book. was because you said it lack of compatbility with existing apps. AutoCAD, 3D Studio, Revit, etc.

    1. Re:LATITUDE ? by spanky1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Latitudes are usually a better choice for corporate use. Inspirons target multimedia and home users. We have purchased Latitude C640 laptops with integrated WiFi, SXGA+ screens (pretty high resolution), and a DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive. Great, solid laptops!

    2. Re:LATITUDE ? by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit of an Apple zealot, but I understand your reasons for going with what you did.. the "I book" as you call it, isn't fast enough to get virtual PC performance out of it to run those Applicatons, but aside from Application support, if I were using a laptop in a construction site on a regular basis, I would want one of them.. they're pretty much bulletproof, but even if they do fail, they're only about US$1000 for a new one..

  50. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Inspiron 7500 as well, and it has been bulletproof for the 3 years I've owned it.

    What I still can't believe is how my 3 year old laptop has a 1400 x 1050 15" screen, but even brand new regular flat panel 15" monitors still only support 1024 x 768. How lame!

    1. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... the resolution on this baby aint to shabby. I still get a lot of 'wow' responses when people see the screen. ~MousePotato

  51. No, they don't call him that by green+pizza · · Score: 0

    No, they don't.

  52. Re:Alienware doesn't offer wuxga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you missed the point about the aspect ratio being the attractive thing here.

  53. Yet another Slashdot (tm) Advertisement by TheDarkener · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "WOW! A shiny new Dell with a cool monitor!! Where can I get one? Slashdot likes it, so I simply *MUST* have one!!"

    (Thoughts running through the marketing droids' heads at Dell 2 weeks ago when they submitted this "News Story" to Slashdot)

    Slashdot: News for nerds, free marketing for corporations.

    Mod me down!! DO IT! I *dare* you.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Yet another Slashdot (tm) Advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you'd think it's ok if it were an Apple advertisement.

    2. Re:Yet another Slashdot (tm) Advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it be ok if it were an Apple advertisement?

  54. hmmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, as a Dell Inspiron 8100 user I would highly recommend waiting a little while prior to a purchase. Here's why:

    My company loves Dell laptops (and they are very good)...however there seems to be a slight design flaw with the screens on the newer Inspiron body style...all of our keyboards are wearing through our monitors (when the laptop is closed and in the laptop bag)...The screen is too close. Now I cannot say if the newer ones will be the same, but all of ours have this problem. All of them. The tech supports guys say that it has something to do with the keyboards being screwed on too tight or something...I don't really care, what I do care is this, my screen will be broken way before this laptop needs replacing. Also I care that my screen looks really bad with all these scratches on the surface of it.

    If you are considering purchasing a new Dell laptop for the clear crisp screen and all of it new real estate then I would try to determine that the new model doesn't have this same problem, otherwise your screen will look like crap in a couple of months.

  55. Damn! 0.1 pounds heavier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you apple bitches find something worth complaining about?

  56. I'd rather have a 17' PowerBook by VUSE+g-EE-k · · Score: 1

    For that much money and weight, I would rather have a 17" Power Book.

  57. Oh yeah. by Trelane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That was exactly my response, too.

    FWIW, an IBM salesdroid I talked with a few months ago said they might ship linux on their laptops this year. We'll see. Nobody's getting my money if I have to send a portion to Redmond, too.

    Just gimme a friggin' laptop without Windows on it! [OK, at a reasonable price, Apple-boy.

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    1. Re:Oh yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current iBooks are quite resonably priced, Troll-boy. Starting at $999, although admittedly anything reasonable will be quite a bit more.

    2. Re:Oh yeah. by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1
      FWIW, an IBM salesdroid I talked with a few months ago said they might ship linux on their laptops this year. We'll see. Nobody's getting my money if I have to send a portion to Redmond, too.

      Last time IBM did this, people bitched because they shipped them with Caldera and LinDVD (yes, it exists). This time it'll probably be SuSE and LinDVD.

      Hey, at least they got the distro right. Give them time, they'll find xine. :)

    3. Re:Oh yeah. by Trelane · · Score: 1
      Although I'm no fan of SCO/Caldera, I'd take it over Windows any day.

      Now, if they shipped no OS (I have a vague recollection that this might be what they're doing instead; bah! Where are my transcripts?! ;) or Debian or Red Hat or SuSE or especially Mandrake (they need the cash).

      Hey, at least they got the distro right. Give them time, they'll find xine. :)


      heh.

      Mmmm. Xine. If only I didn't have to break the law to view my legally purchased!!! [I don't pirate software nor movies nor songs] DVDs.

      Umm, I mean, I, like all patriotic, freedom-loving Americans, use Microsoft® Windows® and Microsoft® Windows® Media Player® exclusively, and am looking forward to having the privilege of supporting Microsoft® every month by buying, nee, leasing their subscription software, and to help in any way I can (money, adding to their userbase and thus peer pressure by using their software and spreading their formats and proprietary extensions, etc.) to help them crush weak competitors who only confuse me by creating gasp! Choices!

      Err, Please move along. There is nothing to see here.
      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    4. Re:Oh yeah. by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1
      Mmmm. Xine. If only I didn't have to break the law to view my legally purchased!!! [I don't pirate software nor movies nor songs] DVDs.

      Actually, on the off chance your DVD isn't encrypted, you don't have to break the law to watch it. More likely than not, you will be breaking the law.

      I remember people bitching because IBM actually had the nerve to use LinDVD on their laptops and it supported everythign WinDVD does (macrovision on the SVideo out was the biggie). To the guys who bitched about that I say, lighten the hell up. Give IBM some credit for shipping a Linux based solution. Rome wasn't built in a day. Likewise, silly laws and restrictions regarding DVDs and encryption won't go away instantly.

    5. Re:Oh yeah. by Trelane · · Score: 1
      I remember people bitching because IBM actually had the nerve to use LinDVD on their laptops and it supported everythign WinDVD does (macrovision on the SVideo out was the biggie).


      Yup. I concur. Macrovision is danged annoying (my TV only has a finite number of connectors, but I can daisychain stuff together if it's not MM-"protected"!) That, and if I'd like to change formats or back it up to another disc (you know, that pesky "fair use" thing) then I'm SOL. OTOH, it's probably legal. *sigh*

      Likewise, silly laws and restrictions regarding DVDs and encryption won't go away instantly.


      Yup. Actually, I'm considering MS Office 11 and its DRM and OpenOffice and other open productivity programs, and thinking that companies would probably really like it. OO is looking at better GPG/PGP coordination (good idea!), but making it more granular (i.e. allowing/disallowing printing, writing, reading, etc.) is lacking.

      If DRM is ever going to be trusted, it's gotta be FOSS (it'll be non-centric, since anyone can read the source code and replicate the functionality exactly; and we'll be sure to include (or will include when somebody hacks it in; probably in about 5 seconds!) Fair Use provisions into it. Compare this with MSFT's lock-in (passport + Windows Server required?!), and we'd have an MS Office Killer --if and only if!--we get it implemented in time to prevent the people getting locked in to MSFT. Once they do that, they're SOL on their old documents unless someone can hack MSFT's DRM outside the US or other stupid IP country (DMCA and equivalent being the problem).

      Some aspects of DRM are positive, and it'll be looked for in business solutions! We've gotta have it or lose what little momentum we've gotten.
      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  58. Hope you don't want it anytime soon.. by kperrier · · Score: 1

    I went throught the customization/order process (I just accepted the default config) and the estimated ship date is April 10.

    Kent

  59. Indeed. And what a lame demonstrat. of wealth -nt- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sdsdsdsdsdssd

  60. *insert Apple comparison here* by hexdcml · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Crikey, at that price, I might as well save up to get either a 17" PowerBook or get the 15" now.. both are way thinner, lighter and better looking. I think no discussion about notebooks is complete without a comparison to Apple notebooks and the obligatory Mac Vs. PC debate. However, I'd just like to point out that their [Apple's] notebooks are just *that* much better (IMHO) than anything that's on the market. Dell and co should take Sony's stand and actually try to build a)Fully featured notebooks b)Pay attention to asthetics c)light and portable enough to be actually used as a mobile computer. *start rant* I take my iBook everywhere with me and much to PC notebook owners, I don't feel it a hassel to open it up just to check on a date on my iCal or catch up on work anywhere. OS X's instant on makes it as if I'm using a palm top.. unlike XP's startup from sleep. It's those 20 seconds or so that puts people off from starting their computer *end rant* I took a look at the "bottom" of the Dell on the website and noted all the fugly holes, ventelatiion, battery compartments, compulsory Windows stickers and other bloat. Why can't they just keep it simple??

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    1. Re:*insert Apple comparison here* by g4dget · · Score: 1
      I have a Titanium Powerbook. The Titanium powerbooks are much better looking, and the slot-loading drive is really neat. Apple service is generally good. And Mac OS X beats Windows in just about every respect.

      But they aren't all roses either. The enamel keeps peeling off, and the exterior of the machine, being metal, is prone to denting. The processor is pretty slow by current Intel standards. And DVD playback on my Ti Powerbook is unreliable (yes, Apple tried to fix this by replacing the drive, but the problem persisted--I think it's the software, actually). Wireless range on my Ti Powerbook is also poor compared to other notebooks. Overall, the Ti Powerbook is a reasonably nice and usable machine, but it's not a design that Apple should continue or that others should emulate; I bought it for the G4, not the looks.

      Perhaps you haven't noticed any of that because you say you have an iBook, which I think are much more robust and practical. The main problem with the iBooks (and why I didn't get one) is that they are fairly slow--fast enough for word processing and the like, but not if you do significant computation. What Apple really needs to do is come out with a G4 iBook, and, of course, a much faster processor, both on their laptops and on their notebooks.

      And if PC vendors copy anything, it should be the iBook. The Titanium Powerbook is a compromise between looks and practicality. You may notice that Apple's new 12" and 17" notebooks are already made out of different materials.

    2. Re:*insert Apple comparison here* by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Very nice comparison. :)

    3. Re:*insert Apple comparison here* by Lynn+Benfield · · Score: 1

      The enamel keeps peeling off [tipaint.com]

      Have you actually tried TiPaint.com? According to several of the reader reports at MacInTouch, they're a scam.

      the exterior of the machine, being metal, is prone to denting.

      Hardly something you can fault them for - build it out of plastic and you're more likely to crack it than make a dent. Not much you can do other than take care: they're computers, they're always going to be delicate.

      what Apple really needs to do is come out with a G4 iBook

      That would be the 12" PowerBook. It's pretty obvious that this was going to be "the G4 iBook", but they probably couldn't get the cost down for the first rev - but that's what it is.

    4. Re:*insert Apple comparison here* by g4dget · · Score: 1
      Have you actually tried TiPaint.com? According to several of the reader reports [macintouch.com] at MacInTouch, they're a scam.

      No, but I have a Titanium Powerbook, and the paint keeps peeling. I pointed at TiPaint.com because they have a picture (mine actually was worse). I don't recommend people buy their stuff, I recommend people send in their Powerbooks for repair to Apple.

      Hardly something you can fault them for - build it out of plastic and you're more likely to crack it than make a dent. Not much you can do other than take care: they're computers, they're always going to be delicate.

      I don't fault anybody for anything, I'm just saying that in my experience with the Titanium Powerbook, metal does not make a good material for a laptop casing.

      It doesn't take much to dent the Titanium Powerbook, and the case also flexes. Polycarbonate cases, like those used on the iBook or the IBM laptops, don't crack, don't flex, and don't peel.

      That would be the 12" PowerBook [apple.com].

      Let me spell it out for you: "what Apple needs to come out with, in my opinion, is a G4 processor in an iBook-like polycarbonate casing because the metal casings just aren't as durable in my experience". OK?

    5. Re:*insert Apple comparison here* by FunkyChild · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the newer revision TiBooks don't have the paint problems as the earlier ones. That's what I've read anyway and I hope it's true because I've got my heart set on a 1GHz TiBook!

    6. Re:*insert Apple comparison here* by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      The shells on the new 12" and 17" models are made of anodized aluminum, a scratch-resistant metal. The neat thing about anodizing is that Apple could make them any color, but they probably chose grey to make them similar to the titanium shells. Aluminum is also cheaper to purchase. That's not to say that titanium isn't awesome though -- much lighter, stronger, etc. etc... If I had my druthers, and if cost were no object, I'd actually want a beryllium shell on my laptop, as it would be incredibly light.

    7. Re:*insert Apple comparison here* by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Inspiron 1100.

      Dell does have more than 1 model, just like Apple.

  61. Re:No, YOU'RE ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, I want that super-masculine antlerbone laptop with mudflaps and chrome! And I want a super-masculine PDA, MP3 player, headset, and computer! Because technology is SO FUCKIN' MASCULINE IT MAKES MY DICK EXPLODE WITH RAGE!!!

  62. 1920x1200 or 1600x1200? by david94133 · · Score: 1

    The display supports 1920x1200, but both graphics cards available only support 1600x1200, according to Dell's own pages.

    What gives?

    1. Re:1920x1200 or 1600x1200? by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both cards actually support 2048x1536. Dell just didn't have a screen that did this on a laptop before now. It's a new product, give them time. =)

      --
      -----------------------------------------
      Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
  63. HDTV Resolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...thats 1920x1200, high enough resolution to watch HDTV quality movies

    Confused here... What "resolution" exactly does HDTV run at?
    1. Re:HDTV Resolutions by bobeszcica · · Score: 1

      AFAIK highest HDTV resolution is 1080p, or 1080 lines. With 16:9 picture format that should mean a 1920x1080 resolution.

    2. Re:HDTV Resolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AFAIK highest HDTV resolution is 1080p, or 1080 lines. With 16:9 picture format that should mean a 1920x1080 resolution.

      Ah hA!

      Yeah, I was thinking 1080... but I was thinking cells [pixels] in a line. (So, I was coming up with 1080x607.)

      You answered my question. Thanks!
  64. Eyestrain by Michael_Burton · · Score: 1

    I'm getting old, and my eyes are getting feeble. How many people are going to be able to read text on their laptop screen at this size and resolution?

    Prime time for resolution-independent display technology, I think.

    --
    When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
    1. Re:Eyestrain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm as old as you are, and I could certainly use the pixels. My UXGA IBM T22 (1400x1050) barely has enough.

      Remember, you're only talking about 100 dpi, whereas your printer has 10 to 100 times the pixel density. With a WUXGA display, you can almost passably display two letter pages of text on the screen at once, which makes a huge difference for anyone using a computer for modern tasks like DTP, CAD, or coding.

  65. pointless by ctour · · Score: 1

    I want a notebook computer that is small and light and portable, the iBook got it right with it's 12 inch screen. this trend, started by apple with it's 17 inch screens, seems to go against the very purpose of a portable computer... to be small and light. If I want a big screen to watch movies on then I'll sit my butt at home and watch them on the TV.

  66. For all of you who say Apple is too much $$... by justMichael · · Score: 5, Informative

    And are drooling about this thing.

    I speced one as close as I could to my 1GHz TiBook and it was the same price and the Dell did not include a SuperDrive equivalent.

    So considering that the keyboard/mouse thingy has been replaced twice in my Dell Inspiron in 18 months, I think I will stick with my TiBook.

    Looks like a nice machine other than the fact that I have seen too many Dell portables fall apart.

  67. ~150dpi by Merlin42 · · Score: 1

    Unless I messed up the numbers I get about 159dpi horizontal and 143dpi vertical. Time to get out a maginifying glass to read any overengineered web sites that still assume everyone is running 640x480(or maybe 800x600) at 72 dpi.

    ps
    I am assuming the widescreen is 16x9 and the 15.4 inch is the diagonal measurement. But the numbers are almost the exact same for a 4x3 screen (~155 horizontal)

    pps
    (16x)^2+(9x)^2=15.4^2 => x ~= .84 => 13.4inch by 7.55inch
    (4x)^2+(3x)^2=15.4^2 => x~= 3 => 12inch by 9inch

    1. Re:~150dpi by eddy · · Score: 1

      "Time to get out a maginifying glass"

      You could do that. Or you could just select your desired magnification from the zoom-selector at the bottom of your Opera window. :-)

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    2. Re:~150dpi by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      The pixel density is uniform throughout the panel. The way you figure it is:

      SQRT(1920^2 + 1200^2)/15.4

      That gives you just over 144 ppi.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    3. Re:~150dpi by Merlin42 · · Score: 1
      The pixel density is uniform throughout the panel.

      What does that mean? Are you saying that if I draw any 1 inch line on the monitor it will always cross just over 144 pixels (or actually 147 if I run your formula)? That would be close, but wrong. If I draw a horizontal line I will cover more pixels than a vertical line would, not many more, but it would.

      <rant> dpi or ppi are linear measurements so they only make sense when specified with respect to a line of measurement. Most general purpose monitors have very close to square pixels, but in fact most are just slightly rectangular. </rant>

    4. Re:~150dpi by sdavid · · Score: 1

      Which gives you the magic 2(72ppi) meaning that bitmapped graphics can be scaled up easily and type can take advantage of the higher resolution, assuming the OS can do this. I'm not a huge fan of dell laptops and I like my powerbook, but it seems to me that displays like this are going to make a huge difference in the readability of text, and that's what I care about.

    5. Re:~150dpi by akhaksho · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's probably what he's saying, and if so, he's absolutely correct. I don't know where you're getting this information about non-square pixels, but it doesn't make much sense. It's much more likely that your math is wrong. In any case, this particular panel that we're talking about does have square pixels. According to Samsung's specs, the active area is 331.2mm x 207.0mm and the pixel pitch is 0.1725mm. Multiply it out and you'll see that the pixels are square. By the way, the model number of the panel is LTN154UXGA. I'd like to see you come up with a panel that has non-square pixels. This is yet another case of the clueless modding up the misinformed.

    6. Re:~150dpi by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm one of those wierd types that likes to maintain spreadsheets for just about anything... I have one of Display resolutions that I started awhile ago, and have been updating.

      By my calculations, this new notebook has a resolution of 147.0 pixels per inch. For comparison, a 15" CRT (viewable 13.8") running at 800x600 (I know plenty of these people,) has a whopping 72.5 dots per inch. That means that anyone used to running 800x600 on a 15"er will need a magnifying glass to read this new display, at double the resolution.

      A 17" CRT (16" viewable) at 1024x768 comes in at 80 dpi. So this new display isn't quite double, but it's close. (For reference, Apple's new 17" PowerBook has a 99.9 dpi, the highest dpi Apple laptops, the PowerBook and iBook 12", top out at 105.8 dpi.

      Although, I shouldn't complain, my Sony PictureBook, with it's 8.9", 1024x480 screen, comes in at 127.1 dpi, and the newer models, with a 1280x600 screen, beat even the new Dell at 158.9 dpi.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  68. Ah, lets compare to my recent notebook purchase by owlicks58 · · Score: 1, Informative

    I went through the adding to cart process, and made a Dell with roughly the same specs as my Powerbook, now lets compare. My Powerbook -15.2 In Widescreen -1 Ghz G4 -1 Inch Thick -5 lbs w/drive and battery -CD-RW/DVD-R (standard) -1 Gig RAM -60 Gig HD (standard) -ATI 9000 w/64 MB (standard) -OS X Included Free -Price $2,836 shipped Dell -15.4 Inch Widescreen -2.2 Ghz P4 -1.5 inch thick -6.5 lbs without drive -CD-RW -1 Gig RAM -60 Gig Hard Drive ($130 extra) -Nvidia GeForce 4 4200 64 MB ($99 extra) -Win XP Professional ($79 extra) -Price $3436 Funny thing those consumers... the Powerbook is lighter, sleeker, has a DVD Writer, and is $600 friggin cheaper. Apple is overpriced my ass....

    --
    -Alex
    1. Re:Ah, lets compare to my recent notebook purchase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the Apple has half the performance of the Dell.

    2. Re:Ah, lets compare to my recent notebook purchase by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Funny, I just did I price compare and came out with something quite different. Let's see...

      Powerbook G4:
      1 Ghz cpu
      15.2" Widescreen TFT (1280x854)
      512 MB in 2 SODIMMs (SDRAM)
      ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 64mb
      CDRW/DVD drive (not superdrive)
      60 GB HD
      Mac OSX
      no productivity software included (Office X avail. $499)
      price: $2449

      Dell Inspiron 8500
      2.0 Ghz cpu
      15.4" Widescreen TFT (1920x1280)
      512 MB in 2 SODIMMs (DDR)
      Nvidia Geforce4 4200 Go 64mb
      CDRW/DVD drive
      60 GB HD
      Windows XP Home
      Wordperfect/Quicken pack (Office Pro avail. $329)
      price: $2578

      So yeah, the powerbook is cheaper, but you get lower resolution, no productivity software, slower ram, slower graphics card - but also less weight. Looks pretty even to me (I'm not even going to try and compare 1 Ghz powerPC processor to 2 Ghz P4).

    3. Re:Ah, lets compare to my recent notebook purchase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's funny about this comment is that if you switched the words Dell and Apple, it'd probably get modded +3 Insightful. Whereas now it will be probably be modded -1 Troll (despite the fact that it's true).

    4. Re:Ah, lets compare to my recent notebook purchase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI 1280x854 is about 44% the area of 1920x1280.

  69. Do they call you the customizer? by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks for the 'news', but I'm not in the market for a laptop right now.

    And if I was, I'd have found this information myself.

    BTW, I'm trying to sell an old waterbed. Do you mind if I stick a flyer up on the homepage? Thanks.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  70. Maths Pedant alert by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    I know people in the US don't know kilograms BUT
    6.9 lbs. (2.96 kg) and 6.8 pounds (3.1 kg) doesn't work :-)

    One not interesting fact at all here is that at approx 235 cubic inches for the Dell and 157 cubic inches for the Apple we can see that by volume the Dell is much lighter 0.03 lbs per cubic inch v 0.043 for the Apple.

    So in fact the question is why is the Apple so heavy...

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  71. Give him a break... by spanky1 · · Score: 1

    ...he works for NASA.

  72. Hard to see? by neuph · · Score: 1
    Does anyone else think that this is an ambitious resolution for a 15" screen? Granted, it will generally be closer than a desktop 15" monitor (which I need to have at 800x600, 1024x768 at most), but I still think that would make it too hard to read.

    Note: I don't wear glasses. Maybe I should?

    1. Re:Hard to see? by vasqzr · · Score: 1



      Well, remember that a 15" LCD is almoat the same display size as a 17" CRT...

      you can't compare screen sizes like that. Get a ruler out and measure a 15" inch monitor, some of the cheaper ones are 12" diagonally!

  73. jkjk by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    Dell never ceases to amaze me. Until recently I was a diehard Toshiba supporter, that is until their Canadian division dropped the ball on their choice of adopting the Legacy Free BIOS design (bad for Linux) and issues surrounding desktop processors in their notebooks.

    I'd written that article two months before I decided on a Dell Inspiron 8200 complete with a 64 meg GeForce440 and all its UXGA glory. Runs Q3A in a full-out 1600x1200 with nary a hitch. Typing this article on that same 8200 now actually.

    Dell truly knows how to cater to geek needs. They're a progressive minded company with cool commercials and damn good laptops. So long as they maintain their high standards, I'll be a customer of theirs for awhile to come.

    - IP

  74. Thinkpad by NetJunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Thinkpad T30 with their 1400x1050 14" screen and LOVE it. It's enough room for two side by side pages or a web browser and a couple of IM windows. It's not real heavy and has been a serious workhorse. It's crashed once in the last 4 months, and that was due to new ATI drivers (that weren't official).

  75. For whom do you work, Dell or the retailer? -nt- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lalalalalallala

  76. compare the pics... by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

    Compare these two photos:
    Inspiron 8500
    PowerBook G4

    I know, I know... it's just the bottom of the machine, but you gotta love style.

    1. Re:compare the pics... by Junta · · Score: 1

      No, I gotta love accessibility.

      My iBook... I can change the battery easily..... and I can lift the keyboard and access the airport card with little difficulty... Go through a pain in the ass and I can get to the memory slot... Getting to the hard drive requires pretty much disassembling the entire thing with a jeweler's screwdriver and a teeny-tiny allen wrench...

      Typical PC laptop: I am within 2 or three screws of accessing mini-PCI,memory, and hard drive. This laptop allows you to get to much much more than an Apple product will let you get at. The PowerMac towers are relatively well designed with respect to upgrading, but ultimately, Apple products are a systems approach without easy path to maintenance and upgrade.

      I couldn't care less about how the bottom of my laptop that I never look at anyway *looks*, I care about the utility. The bottom is a good place to make ass-ugly for the sake of upgrading, you aren't stuck looking at it while using it.

      On the other hand, the Dell laptops I have used weigh a ton and suck battery like crazy when compared to Apple laptops. Some PC laptops I've seen weigh appropriate amounts (not by Dell), but none come close to an Apple laptop's battery life.. So it isn't exactly perfect on the PC side of laptops either...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:compare the pics... by paradesign · · Score: 1
      how many laptop users change their own HDD? apple thinks about these things. they make access easy to things that need to be easily accessed, (battery, airport card) and make it dificult to access things that dont need to be easily accessed (HDD). its called good design, and apple has i and is what makes them better than PCs even though theyre 'less powerful'.

      btw i own several macs and pcs.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    3. Re:compare the pics... by Junta · · Score: 1

      How many laptop users change their wireless card once installed? Not many relative to hard drives, *especially* in a business environment. If a business uses drive imaging for set up, this is critical. With a PC, unscrew a few things, get the hard drive, plug it into a desktop (with 9 dollar adapter) and install the image. HDDs also are much much much more likely to fail than an airport card, and once out of warranty, who would want to pay apple the extortion fees of their repair service when it can be done much more cheaply yourself, so you are digging through the case to save money. The likelihood that a non-tech person trying to save money will do serious damage is much higher when they have to disassemble the whole thing as opposed to just getting at the hard drive. Same goes for memory, although easier to access than the drive, it is not a replacement/upgrade that is as likely as soon.

      The ultimate question is, what is gained by making it harder to access this stuff? A few extra lines in the case. What is lost? A great deal of flexibility. I like Mac laptops because they are quiet, cool (except the fire hazard that is the 12" powerbook), and have long battery life. Laptops are significantly harder to service in general than desktops, but apple laptops really raise the bar in difficult to service laptops.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:compare the pics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many laptop users change their own HDD?

      I dunno. But you're reading a message from one.

  77. Steve Jobs is laughing now... by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    You know everyone at Apple is rubbing their hands together and laughing wickedly...

    But ya know, it figures that this comes out two weeks after my Inspiron 4150 shows up :)

  78. Too funny!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We have Apple pimps on three fronts:
    1. It doesn't look at all like my slick-ass Apple notebook.
    2. It looks lik a two year old Apple notebook.
    3. It looks too much like a Powerbook.
  79. A notebook lives (or dies) on batteries by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    The only reason for me to use a crappy, non-ergonomic keyboard and moose is because I can't plug into AC, which means I'm dependent on battery life. 3-4 hours (as claimed) is really not much of an incentive, given the hefty weight and price tag.

    Granted, it's kewl, sexy, and has a wide screen, but so does JLo.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  80. This reminds me of an old high school joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There used to be a joke that went around the kids at my high school in the 80s that was very funny. Sort of a signifying thing, but very enjoyable. It went a little something like this:

    A: What do you call nuts on a wall?
    B: Wall nuts?
    A: Yeah.
    A: What do you call nuts on a chest?
    B: Chest nuts?
    A: Yeah.
    A: What do you call nuts on a chin?
    B: Uhhh... what?
    A: Nothin' because my dick's gonna be in yo mouth.

    Well... being the teen nerds that my friends an I were... We made a variant of that that is just as funny for nerds:

    A: What do you call nuts on a wall?
    B: Wall nuts?
    A: Yeah.
    A: What do you call nuts on a chest?
    B: Chest nuts?
    A: Yeah.
    A: What do you call nuts on a chin?
    B: Chin nuts!

    We still laugh at that today. All one of us has to do is look at the other one and say, "Chin nuts".

  81. awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also heard its so enormous you can open it up
    and use it as a hang glider, or get under it
    as a tent in a pinch.

    RADICAL DUDE

  82. Not quite by BoomerSooner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The resolution is 1900x1200 which beats the hell out of 1440x900 not to mention Apple crippled their laptops by switching to the OLD Geforce 4 Go 420 which is like the POS Geforce 4 MX. The ATI was better. Now if the new 15" comes with a nVidia Geforce 4 Go 4200 w/128MB I'll buy it. Otherwise I may hold off completely.

    I'm a huge apple fan but some of the most critical things I need to do for my company are either not available for Mac or are exponentially more expensive. BTW I develop software for Linux (2.2+), Windows (win32), Mac (OS X) and Solaris (7+). I have seen the 17" AlBooks at the Apple Store and while impressive it doesn't do much more for me than the old 15.2. If the 15.4 comes available for a decent price (see note) I'll get one as soon as they are available (not the lovely preannouncements Apple has been giving). Otherwise, I'll just get an old TiBook 1GHz for 2550 or so.

    Note: the Dell with 2.4GHz proc, 512MB 1 DIMM, GF4 4200, 60GB, 1920x1200, Extra Battery, ... is still only $3000 compared to apples $3300 for the 17" AlBook.

    1. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      wait, if the 15.2" doesn't do it for you, what makes you think the 15.4" will? Presumably it will have the graphics chip you're complaining about (instead of the Radeon 9000, which is what the 15.2 has). After all, why wouldn't it? Do you think Apple would put the powerful chip in the midrange laptop or the high-end one? The rumors also say that the 15.4" screen has a *lower* resolution than the 15.2" one. Since you imply that higher resolution = better, why would you want the lower-res screen in the 15.4"? Also, what's your timeframe for the 15.4"? The newest 15.2" is only a couple of months old, you might be waiting for quite some time. Just get the current 15.2", which has better specs by your arguments (oh, and it actually exists).

      Methinks you need to sit down and have a chat with your brain, it seems to be malfunctioning.

    2. Re:Not quite by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Note: the Dell with 2.4GHz proc, 512MB 1 DIMM, GF4 4200, 60GB, 1920x1200, Extra Battery, ... is still only $3000 compared to apples $3300 for the 17" AlBook.

      And is also made out of crappy plastic and has the annoying PC nomenclature for not being turned off but yet not being turned on.. which apple calls sleep and Windows/pc manufacturers call Hibernate or Deep sleep or Sleep or Suspend to ram or suspend to disk, or indeed, pick two or three. Apple's laptops "just work".. no fiddling around with the power/sleep settings to get something useful. And 1920x1200 is nice at 23 inchs.. at 15.4.. I would think not so much :)

      And don't get me started on the extra software that those extra $300 will buy you ;)

    3. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, my friend, are an idiot.

      In Windows:

      Stand By = Low power mode, disks offf, CPU in power save mode, etc. You can go for several weeks in standby. Also known as "Sleep".

      Hibernation = Save memory to disk, power off system. The system is completely off. Also known as Suspend to Disk (rarely), and I have never heard it called "Deep Sleep"

      Dell's notebooks at 15" with UXGA (1600x1200) screens are fully readable. UXGA on a 15" CRT is terrible, but it's fine on a TFT. If you can't read the text, Windows offers variable text size.

      "And don't get me started on the extra software that those extra $300 will buy you ;)"

      Hmmm... iTunes (WMP9 works fine, thank you), iPhoto ($330 can buy Jasc Paint Shop Pro or Photoshop Elements AND a photo organization program like Jasc After Shot), iDVD (What's left of that $330 can buy a nice entry-level DVD authoring program), iMovie (Windows Movie Maker 2 is actually pretty competitive; Dell will likely include a more advanced program as well).

      "And is also made out of crappy plastic"

      ABS is actually quite durable, and most modern notebooks have an internal metal frame.

      "Apple's laptops "just work".. no fiddling around with the power/sleep settings to get something useful."

      So do Dell's. Seriously. Fiddle with the power settings if you're a control freak, but otherwise the defaults are just fine.

      Look, the PowerBook is still a very nice laptop. If you want a Mac, don't get the Dell. Many of us, however, don't really care whether it runs Windows or Mac OS X. We want the most hardware for our buck. And the Dell, at least from what I have heard, will give the PowerBook G4 a run for it's money hardware wise.

    4. Re:Not quite by Onan · · Score: 1

      > Note: the Dell with 2.4GHz proc, 512MB 1 DIMM,
      > GF4 4200, 60GB, 1920x1200, Extra Battery, ... is still
      > only $3000 compared to apples $3300 for the 17" AlBook.

      Yeah, but you lose the builtin 802.11g/b, gigabit ethernet, firewire 800 and 400, auto-adjusting backlit keyboard, dvd burner, and 33% thinner form.

      I'm not saying the Dell's a terrible deal, I'm quite envious of the higher density display. But the 17" alBook certainly holds its own.

    5. Re:Not quite by andrewski · · Score: 1

      iMovie (Windows Movie Maker 2 is actually pretty competitive;

      Methinks you meant "primative" and not "competitive!"

      Oops!

    6. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three other problems

      1) It runs Windows, You can't get OS X yet.
      2) A P4! 20 times faster than ram. But Slower than a 1.2 ghz PIII. Hot slow mother.
      3) Cheap ( nonexistent heatsink )( fan constantly ON )
      Dell and Gateway both running scared they're loosing customers to Apple.

  83. I second that! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    I totally agree. This isn't news; it's a plug. Actually, it might be nice if they had a "cool new product" section with its own icon, so I could block it in my user preferences. I like real "technology" stories, but I hate this sort of crap.

  84. Re:i own an 8200 too, with Linux by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Switch to Linux
    My machine is solid w/ NVIDIA drivers.

  85. $3,277 by xaoslaad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, for a Geoforce4 4200 Go with 64MB RAM, a 2.4 GHz processor, and 1 GB RAM using 2 DIMMS, I managed to run the price up to $3,277..........

    Now I can get a Shuttle SB51G case for ~325, a 3.06 GHz P4 for $548, 2x512MB DIMMS for $88 [total], and a Built by ATI Radeon 9700 Pro for $320, total = 1281.... mind you I still need HDD, Display, and CD-ROM drive, but can I manage to rack up another 2K for that? Especially if upgrading and using my old CD-ROM, Display, and HDD???

    Don't get me wrong, I love Dell; I think they typically make superior PC's/Servers&Notebooks. But, is portability at the sake of performance, and that whopping price tag worth it???

  86. apple weight by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    So in fact the question is why is the Apple so heavy...

    The Apple is made from Aluminum -- skin, frame, and all.

  87. Compare it to the G4 17" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting



    You get a 17" screen, which is quite a big bigger. It's only 1440x900, which might not even make this a worthy comparison.

    With the Dell configured to G4 specs, it costs more, doesn't even have all the features, and is heavier and the battery doesn't last as long.

    Not to mention if you order from a Mac reseller, they'll double your RAM, throw in a printer, carrying case, and maybe another goodie for FREE.

    Why PC makers can't get their laptops right, I'll never know.

    Does anyone even have an app that would need that kind of screen on a laptop? 1600x1200 on a 15 inch LCD is nuts enough.

    The 15.2" Powerbook is as big as screens need to be. WIDER is better. Personally, I'd rather have a 12" Powerbook or an iBook. It's a portable, after all.

    1. Re:Compare it to the G4 17" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the proof?

  88. Back to the Old School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just released and already looks old school.

  89. Aww crap... by SubliminalLove · · Score: 1

    I got an Inspiron 8200 for Cristmas and it's already a paperweight... crap.

    ~SL

  90. WUGXA? by frostfreek · · Score: 3, Funny

    "notebook with a WUXGA screen"
    Call me back when you have an Awooogah screen.
    I want to use it on my submarine.

  91. $59 for a floppy drive... by dreadpiratemark · · Score: 1

    And, since it doesn't have a floppy drive, Dell is happy to charge you $59 for one for the modular bay. I know that this is inevitable, it has a cd-rw, blah blah blah, but for $2400, it seems like they could include a floppy.

    1. Re:$59 for a floppy drive... by vasqzr · · Score: 1


      Why should they give you one?

      Apple doesn't.

      Granted, you might be a tech using this thing on the road (yeah, right) and you might find a floppy drive to come in handy.

      Watch 56K modems become 'add-ons' in the near future.

    2. Re:$59 for a floppy drive... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      For $40 you can get a nice little 32 MB USB keychain drive... who cares about floppy?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  92. Re:No, YOU'RE ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah! damned apple and it's retarded pink laptops. gotta hate those pink laptops apple made. yeah.

    um

    dude

    apple never made pink laptops. lay off the cheap bourbon.

  93. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Short answer is that I have lost my faith in Dell, and until they prove themselves to me again, I won't buy their products, and I advise other people to do the same, no matter now nifty-cool they may be.

    And just how do they prove themselves to you again if you won't deal with them?

    I note that we have 5 Dells in our immediate family, including the 5 year old Dimension I'm typing this on. I've also worked closely with another dozen, and never had any problem with Dell service or support. I submit that your experience is not universal to all Dell owners.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  94. clarifications by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    ...And the Dell has a faster CPU (the 1 GHz G4 isn't going to beat a 2 GHz P4M in most tasks)...

    Very true, but keep in mind that the hardware will have to throttle down the P4M to less than 2 GHz for maximum battery life. The PowerBook can run at full speed without much impact. (Though the PB *can* throttle down for low-cpu tasks -- watching a DVD, etc -- for even longer battery life). Maybe a good laptop spec could be "number of cpu cycles per battery". In my experience, a laptop needs to be fast *and* have a long battery life.

    ...Both have CD-RW/DVD-R's...

    The Dell, at the price you quoted, does not have a CDR-RW/DVD-R -- it only has a CDRW/DVD-ROM, it cannot record DVDs. The PowerBook can.

  95. Re:my dell...*another* anecdote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my Dell Latitude when the P3 1GHz were first available in notebooks. It has been well over a year and been travelled little but used daily. The only things that have gone wrong are the mobo flaking out and needing replacement, the LCD going bad and needing replacement and the keyboard falling apart and needing replacement. I hope the new line is better quality than this p.o.s. I got...

  96. Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    And go update your drivers. You're obviously NOT running the latest ones.

    My dad had bluescreen problems with his I8000 and obtained new drivers from *Windows Update* of all places. This was months ago.

    I was using the latest Dell drivers from their website with no problems whatsoever. I don't think my 8200 has ever bluescreened even once.

    And if you bothered to do ANY research at all, you would've found the D-Force (and related) modified INFs that are regularly maintained so that you can use your latest Detonator release with "Go" series of GeForces. Yes, I'm running the 41.09 Detonator release on my 8200 with full functionality.

    BTW, Dell has some excellent user-to-user support forums if you go to their support website.

    Oh yeah, and it runs Linux beautifully too.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  97. A laptop with wuxia? by Randolpho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool!

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  98. Gawd that's ugly! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    I think it was designed by the same genius industrial designer that designed this

    Homer! You've ruined me!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  99. Remember the first beta tester? by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1
    ...using it on one's lap would create safety (and fertility) issues...
    He he! I assume you are referring to this guy? I read the blurb on Dell's site, but was disappointed not to find a reference to it's blistering performance.
    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  100. Battery life? What's that? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    The Alienware systems use desktop CPUs, not mobile CPUs. No SpeedStep and less efficient GHz for GHz (usually the mobile chips have more recent manufacturing process technology than the equivalent desktop version)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  101. Battery life? by shayborg · · Score: 1

    The site says up to 72 watt-hours ... How long will that much juice last with a 2.4 GHz P4M? In other words how many watts does that processor suck down?

    -- shayborg

  102. Damn my sales guy by sl0w · · Score: 1, Funny

    I seriously just dropped a chunk of change on the baddest ass 8200 money could buy yesterday and now those bastards come out with the 8500 with a better video card?

    Ass-hats oops, can I say that?

  103. BDVGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Damn VGA (it's so big, our insurance provider won't let us tell you how big it is for fear of killing you)

  104. "Odd" Resolutions bad, dual screens worse... by hirschma · · Score: 1

    For games, that is :) Under Windows, for sure.

    I can't play one game under Windows across two monitors - no games recognize either true dual head, or the "single" workspace hack that most video card makers provide these days. Dual monitors, properly supported, would rock for most RTS games. I have two 15" LCDs, but all games refuse to go beyond 1024x768 on my setup. No custom resolutions available.

    Of course, this isn't an issue under Linux. UT2003 works just fine across two monitors, although things are centered where the bezels meet, which isn't that great :( But at least the underlying mechanics are OK.

    jonathan

    1. Re:"Odd" Resolutions bad, dual screens worse... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      UT2003 works just fine across two monitors, although things are centered where the bezels meet, which isn't that great

      Sounds like you need a third monitor.

      --

      I write in my journal
  105. WinTV-D/HD - UGH! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Check out www.avsforum.com - The WinTV-D/HD cards suck. (Design-wise, not so bad, but Hauppauge's software support is HORRENDOUS.)

    Most popular cards out now are the Telemann HiPix and the MIT (not the educational institution in MA) MyHD. The MyHD is the cheapest, at $300. (Others are $400). Another Korean company, DVICO, is releasing an HDTV tuner card for approx. $160 that depends on software for the MPEG decoding. (The other cards have hardware MPEG-2 MP@HL compliant decoders, which is a significant portion of the cost. Cheapo decoders such as most RealMagic ones only support MP@ML. Of course the hardware cards have been used successfully in a 233 MHz Pentium while the SW card needs approx. a P3-1 GHz)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  106. DVI useful now by hirschma · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but it is useful now. Sharper, better.

    The real reason why they don't put them in is because the port takes up more space, and they'd need to spend an additiona $.50 for an adapter.

    jonathan

    1. Re:DVI useful now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thing is they have the firewire connector,DUH!!!!

  107. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

    And just how do they prove themselves to you again if you won't deal with them?

    Simple. I ask around. When I stop hearing horror stories from other owners (Did I mention I'm a sysadmin at a major university? Even their corporate support has been spotty for us.), I'll reconsider. As long as I hear people (sysadmins, people I know and respect) saying "steer clear," I'll avoid them.

    --
    Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
  108. Whoi cares? by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Who cares? Does 7 pounds really kick your ass that much? Look how much is packed into that 7 pounds! All of this complaining about these "heavy" notebooks is ridiculous. You're actually complaining about a 7 pound laptop that you can carry anywhere, watch DVDs on, burn CDs, and play 3D games on? I own a Dell 8100 w/ 2 batteries always in it and the weight doesn't bother me a bit because I can appreciate what I've got. Maybe all of these people whining about "heavy" notebooks should try joining the military and humping a pack, weapons, body armor, food, water, and ammo. That might change their persepctive...

    1. Re:Whoi cares? by asv108 · · Score: 1

      Well why pack a 7 pound full featured notebook when you can pack a 5 pound IBM, Apple, Toshiba, or Fujitsu notebook with the same feature set?

  109. Depends on the game by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Quake 3 engine based games are known for being quite well suited to widescreen resolutions, same for UT and its descendants.

    Other games - It depends.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  110. 100% Right ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P4m is a must never use processor for any portable device !

    Drain power, heat surface, ... how can intel still make people beleive it is mobile viable ?

    Ever seen a Tablet PC running P4m ? No, there is no, they either run C3 or crusoe processor.

    -SLK

  111. So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by hirschma · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Outside of the one that SGI released a few years ago, there have been no widescreen tubes or panels for the PC (perhaps some very high-end models).

    Widescreen is nice. The Mac world proves that.

    So, why aren't the PC makers and monitor vendors come out with 16:9 displays and give everyone a reason to upgrade?

    jonathan

    1. Re:So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by Junta · · Score: 1

      There have been. I've dealt with some of them in supporting employees at CAD places. They complain "everything is so squished" when they try to run a 4:3 resolution on them.... Sigh...

      I can't remember the brands, but they weren't SGI displays. A lot of companies catering to engineers running CAD have wide displays out there..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by swb · · Score: 1

      My gripe is that they give you a monitor that has the same horizontal resolution as your current display but short you on vertical resolution, call it a "widescreen cinema display" and charge you more.

      The a 4:3 display gives you the same horizontal resolution, plus all those extra vertical pixels. At the end of the day you can display the same 16:9 image on the 4:3 display, plus you can display non-16:9 stuff larger on the 4:3 display, and usually for less money.

      It's like paying more for the coupe than the sedan, when the sedan holds more and is easier to get into.

    3. Re:So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      You mean like the Apple 20" which nets you 1680x1050 or the 23" which nets you 1920x1200 resolutions?

      The equivalent 4:3 display would be 1680x1260 or 1920x1440.

      Anyway, which 'current displays' have the same horizontal resolutions? The Planar 20" LCD is 1600x1200 for $1,306, just a little bit more expensive than the 20" Apple LCD. I assume this is what you mean, where Apple added 80 more width and cut off 150 in the height?

      The 23" LCDs at Dell, hmm, well darn, there *aren't* any available at any size that do 1920 except Sony's 23" widescreen: 1920x1200 at $2,709, vs Apple's 1920x1200 at $1,999.

      Anyway, I suppose you're free to buy a 20" LCD with more height, but actually I think I appreciate the additional 1" width and 2" loss in height, as a form factor, and I haven't seen any LCD at 1920x1440... though I suppose IBM's ultra high res 22" screens may qualify, though they're really, really, expensive.

    4. Re:So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by xmnemonic · · Score: 1

      Sun Microsystems and IBM have several wide screen LCD's available. The IBM T221 in fact has a resolution 4 times larger than the largest Apple cinema display, and was available several months before it. Of course, being a Mac head, you wouldn't know this.

    5. Re:So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Buy one or more of these.. Buy video card with DVI output for PC (not hard, a LOT of cards come with it now). Buy Apple LCD monitor as so desired. Put PC case sticker "Athlon Powered" or appropriate over shiney Apple logo. Plug everything together and hey presto, you have an Apple LCD monitor running on your PC.

      As other posts pointed out, they're actually cheaper in some cases than PC LCD monitors, since the quantity model of PC LCD is only 15inch, while Apple does 1280x1024 17inch as the minimum

    6. Re:So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no, the T221 actually came out after the Cinema Display. And for $8K vs $2k, you bet it had better have 4 times the resolution... :-)

  112. Re:Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by MindStalker · · Score: 1

    Mentioning that machine, My boss uses that machine and often uses it with an external monitor or projector frequently, but very very often it automatically turns off clone mode for no reason after a reboot. Do you know of anyway of leaving clone mode on permanently??

  113. Is it me or... by Monofilament · · Score: 4, Interesting

    are dell laptops just looking worse and worse. I'm not talking about features.. I'm talking about physical looks. they've release 3 different laptops recently of varying economics, they all look the same.. and they all are ugly as SIN!

    At least teh old inspirions.. standard black.. with the wildly overprice clip on color pads.. were neutral looking. It was black.. it went with anything. Now these things area light blue and odd shade of gray. Seems like colors you'd have as baby-shower decorations than on a laptop.

    Laptops are a fashion statement.. if your gonna be lugging one into your local starbucks it better not be an eye-sore. I looks like they cut the side off some old computer cases and formed them to a laptop case.

    The laptop I will get next will need to be power efficient and powerful(not so concerned about weight).. But if I have to pick i'll choose mroe power than power efficiency. Thats why i've got hopes for Centrino.. or some variant with the Pent-M ..

    This laptop is neither of my requirements.. and its an ugly monster to-boot

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
  114. Inspiron? Never again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I bought an Inspiron 7500 when they were top of
    the line, a couple of years ago. It was too heavy
    to carry anywhere, the hard drive died, the power
    connection died, the battery died, tiny springs
    would fall out of holes in the side . .

    My new laptop? Powerbook G4!

  115. hibernation by javaaddikt · · Score: 1

    Imagine hibernation with 2GB ram... You're gonna need a SCSI drive, too, unless you want to go smell the roses in the meantime. That'll be $1000 more.

    1. Re:hibernation by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Plus the extra RAM will require more power and run the batteries down faster.

    2. Re:hibernation by Qube · · Score: 1

      XP seems to handle hibernation somewhat better than win2k - maybe it just writes what's actually being used to disk rather than everything.

      On my 8200 with 512mb, win2k would take 15-20s to hibernate, XP is more like 7-8s.

  116. Too Expensive by MjDascombe · · Score: 1

    I bet they're going to be relatively expensive though - the only link I could find on google - Looks like it will be

  117. Low resolution in stand alone LCD displays? by antoniol · · Score: 1

    Never got an answer to this one:

    Why is this sort of resolution available in Dell (and a few other brands) laptops, but not in stand alone displays, where pretty much every 15" unit has only 1024*768?

    I have been brushed off with this question here before, when somebody replied that this isn't actually the "real" resolution of the display, but hey, take a look and you'll see that it is.

  118. Dell equipment is cheap (in the nasty sense) by EvilMike · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had the misfortune to have two Dell laptops (Inspiron 7000 back in '99, Latitude C840 presently). They were not my choice - work machines. Both have been heavy, cheaply made junk. The Inspiron had multiple hardware repairs before I got rid of it (screen failure, memory, casing). The current Latitude is only 5 months old and the hard drive crapped out last week. It takes the patience of Job to deal with Dell Support, particularly when you are an IT professional and you already know what is wrong! It only took 3 days to argue the drive replacement out of them.

    Also I'm not sure why Dell bother putting Nvidia graphics adapters in these 'high-end' laptops. Check out the most recent update available for the Geforce 4 440 Go drivers for the Lat C840 (v28.35 anyone?).
    1. Re:Dell equipment is cheap (in the nasty sense) by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      You clearly never worked on the other end, did you?

      I did. It's all scripted. The trick is to learn their scripts better than they know them. When I first dealt with Dell Support, it was just as hellish for me as you claim.

      Once I caught on to their pattern, I started calling, stating a Service Tag, and then mentioned the problem, along with a laundry lists of tests which I had already run (I hadn't, but much like you, I knew what was wrong.)

      This made their job easier (they could technically claim that they followed the script) and I usually had a replacement part sent via next-day air as soon as it broke.

      They're just support guys. The guys who answer the phone are trained to narrow down issues so that they don't end up giving parts away all the time. Once you learn their system, though, it's a cakewalk.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    2. Re:Dell equipment is cheap (in the nasty sense) by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      I've had the misfortune to have two Dell laptops (Inspiron 7000 back in '99, Latitude C840 presently). They were not my choice - work machines. Both have been heavy, cheaply made junk. The Inspiron had multiple hardware repairs before I got rid of it (screen failure, memory, casing). The current Latitude is only 5 months old and the hard drive crapped out last week. It takes the patience of Job to deal with Dell Support, particularly when you are an IT professional and you already know what is wrong! It only took 3 days to argue the drive replacement out of them.

      Gotta say my experience of Dell is completely different. Only problem I've had with my Inspiron notebook (~18 months old) is a battery going bad, and some old geezer from Dell showed up the next day with a new one. He took the old battery away, and even flash-updated my BIOS for me while he was here. I used a Dell desktop at work for about 2 years, and it was a great generic machine - just sat there running Win2K and working as it should. If I was buying x86 I'd probably go straight to dell.com to do it.

    3. Re:Dell equipment is cheap (in the nasty sense) by mat · · Score: 1

      I'm agree with you, Dell laptops quality is really poor. With mine (also a work machine), a C610, I received it with a broken pixel and Dell refused to change the laptop. Then they had to replace the keyborad because the mouse pointer was moving alone. And now I have a hard disk faillure. And if your say that you are runnig Linux, the support generally ask you to reboot to windows to make shure you also have the problem, whatever problem you have (even for the broken pixel).
      All that in 8 months.
      And we also had a lot of broken dell screen on our company.

      So delete dell from you shopping list.

  119. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by bloosqr · · Score: 1

    I bought a 5000e from them about 2 years ago
    but it had/has tons of problems but what has always made dells worth it for me is the splurge on the 3 year *onsite* warranty. Basically it means they come to your house/work at your convienence (w/in a day or two). I have had pretty much the entire machine replaced at this point (motherboard twice, the casing inside and out etc etc). The 5000e was a compal outsource and they stopped selling it pretty quickly but i'm impressed by how quickly/diligently they replace the parts *in warranty*. I appreciate your issues (i.e. once it was out of warranty) but I think it is the dell warranty that makes the machine worth it.. i.e. they can sell me any old piece of shit but I have a $100 (at the time) 3 year guarantee that they fix it on the fly w/out any downtime.

    -avi

  120. 1280x1024 by smilo-bob · · Score: 1

    excuse a dumb question, but is it not so that hdteevee is 1090 virtical lines? could not 1280 by 1024 support this?

    1. Re:1280x1024 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HDTV is 1080 vertical lines, but 1920 horizontal pixels. Therefore, no, 1280x1024 would not work.

  121. Yes, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run Mac OS X ???

  122. same here! by phoxix · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I love my T30. This thing rocks! Its especially works well for linux users being that 99% of this laptop works just dandy with linux.

    Sunny Dubey

    1. Re:same here! by jbridleman · · Score: 1

      I'm considering a T30. What 1% doesn't?

    2. Re:same here! by phoxix · · Score: 1
      The modem is a win-modem (but it works under linux). And hardware suspension is really really iffy (thought I may just need a BIOS update or something).

      HOWEVER, software suspension works like a charm (this includes suspending with hardware accelerated OpenGL, which is a rare for linux laptops)>

      Reply for more info

      Sunny Dubey

    3. Re:same here! by phoxix · · Score: 1
      when I say suspension, I am talking about the computer swapping everything to the hard drive and totally powering off. Windows users may call this feature "hibernate" or something of the sort.

      Sunny Dubey

    4. Re:same here! by andrewski · · Score: 1

      What's the 1% that doesn't work well with Linux? The power management?

    5. Re:same here! by phoxix · · Score: 1
      Sorta. Hareware suspension doesn't work too well, but software suspension does.

      reply for more details

      Sunny Dubey

      PS: when I say suspension, I mean the act of the computer dumping the entire system to RAM. Windows users call this "hibernation" IIRC.

    6. Re:same here! by andrewski · · Score: 1

      So, suspend to disk is totally fucked, or is it just a little wonky? Also, how much battery does it drain in normal 'soft' suspend? I am merely curious because I haven't met many notebooks that behave properly 100% of the time with Linux. Which is odd, because I have run Linux on some of the shittiest, strangest, and most bizarre hardware without issue.

  123. Umm... No thanks by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sorry, but that high of a resolution on a 15in monitor seems kind of idiotic to me. Everything would be tini-tiny, it would only be good for watching DVDs.

    Dell should of produced a 17in 1440-900 laptop like Apple. That'd be a hell of a lot cooler.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Umm... No thanks by SuperRob · · Score: 1

      I'm running 1600x1200 on my Inspiron 8000, and I absolutely love it. No eyestrain whatsoever, plenty of screen real estate for windows, I can't imagine why anyone would want anything less unless your eyesight is really shitty.

      1600x1200 on a 15" screen is not nearly as hard to see on a crisp LCD screen as it is on a CRT.

    2. Re:Umm... No thanks by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, your display manager isn't retarded and actually knows that the real world looks at things in inches or centimeters, not pixels, and adjusts font sizes (which are generally based on points, 1pt is 1/72") accordingly. Your display doesn't do that? Well, perhaps you should make the switch.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
  124. How much? by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's been asked before, but I'll ask it again: how much does one of these front-page, disguised as 'article', advertisements cost exactly?

  125. Re:my dell...*another* anecdote... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    Different compainies actually make dell's notebooks... The Inspiron 5000 (which is similar to the 7000 and 7500) is made by compal, while your Latitude was made by Quanta. That's got to be quite a problem for Dell... you'll only hear the horror stories from the worst notebook they sell. Personally, my PII Inspiron is still going great after 5 years... I cleaned/jiggled the backlight inverter board to fix an intermittent outage, and replaced a broken hinge (It's stood up very well to the abuse I give it!), and it still works like new!

  126. does it come with Linux preinstalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject.

  127. I hope coke bottle classes are included by CatOne · · Score: 1

    Or at least available as an accessory. I have that resolution on my 23" Cinema Display and it's perfect... I'm just not cut out for it on a 15" display. I don't have Steve Austin eyes :-/

  128. Uphill both ways in the snow by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny
    I love all the whining about the weight of the thing. The bag you carry it in will probably weigh as much or more.

    Oldmanrant
    I used to carry a Mac SE with a jerry-rigged hard drive home every night from work on the train. The damn thing was 35 pounds by the time it was in the bag.

    I was happy when we switched to the Compaq Portables. Happy, I tell you!

    Oh yeah, we ate sand.
    /Oldmanrant

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  129. mod parent up! by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    somebody mod parent up! it made me laugh

  130. Wierd - no 64MB/Radeon 9000 option... by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1

    If you want the Radeon 9000, you have to settle for only 32MB, if you want 64MB you have to switch to the nVidia chip.

    With the 8200, you can get the Radeon 9000 with 64MB, so why not this machine? Wierd.

    While this may not bother MS-Windows fans, this sucks for Linux users, as the nVidia drivers are still buggy (yes, I've made bug reports... yes, they've been ignored).

    With regard to the resolution... I've seen the 1600x1200 Dell screen side by side with a 21" Sun monitor with the same image (connected to the notebook) and the 15" LCD was FAR more easy to read, even though it was smaller. The reason why is obvious if you think about it... the basic design of a CRT versus an LCD means the LCD will always be sharper. People think 600dpi is horribly grainy on a printer, but 100dpi is way too high a resolution to read with a display - that just doesn't make sense when you think about it. The obvious answer is to use a bigger font.

    The ethernet card, when you're "configuring" your model, is listed as a 10/100/1000! This is the first gigahertz ethernet notebook implementation I've heard of!

    Once inconsistancy is the front page lists the WiFi as 802.11a/b, but the configuration page lists it as 802.11g/b - big difference, but the latter makes more sense.

    As far as looks go, I like the 8200 better. I wonder if this one cooks your hands like most Dell notebooks... (my Vaio cooks my lap instead, much preferred, I don't like typing with sweaty fingers - not that I'd ever recommend a Vaio to anyone).

    And as others have noted, you have a choice of O/S - MS-Windows XP personal or professional editions... no option for ordering it without MS products. (this will probably get moderated as a troll for this comment by a MS zealot)

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    1. Re:Wierd - no 64MB/Radeon 9000 option... by gaff2k · · Score: 1

      >The ethernet card, when you're "configuring" your model, is listed as a 10/100/1000! This is the first gigahertz ethernet notebook implementation I've heard of!

      The 15" PowerBook has had this for ~2 years....

      --
      -gaff2k
    2. Re:Wierd - no 64MB/Radeon 9000 option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, there aren't any Notebook with _gigahertz_ ethernet card, Powerbook neither. These are gigabyte ram ethernet cards.

      Jeez...Newbies, Newbies...

    3. Re:Wierd - no 64MB/Radeon 9000 option... by Squozen · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, seems that you've missed the fact that Apple have offered gigabit ethernet on their 15" and 17" TiBooks for some time now.

  131. Here's what I want by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    An Aluminum Powerbook (no paint, no flaking)
    A Geforce 4 4200 Go or ATI Radeon 9000 (or better)
    15"+ wide aspect ratio screen (1920x1200)
    I have a 22" cinema display at home and my only complaint is 1600x1024 instead of 1920x1200 like on the 23"
    And an option to get it without a damn DVD burner (I have zero need and by the time I do need one they will be better anyway)

    Oh yeah how about $3300

    I'm actually quite satisfied with the TiBook with the exception of the Airport Reception and the Flaking and easy scratching.

    Once the new 15" book comes out I'll buy the old 1GHz one (DVD Burner be damned).

  132. OS using X by pkunzipper · · Score: 1

    Another reason to switch to Linux.

    1. Re:OS using X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm - why? Windows does this too, idiot.

    2. Re:OS using X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      until you sit there banging your head agaist the desk for 8 hours trying to get your mother-loving soundcard to work. Then you might just go ahead and switch back.

    3. Re:OS using X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does?
      How do enable this feature on WinXP and Win98?
      When I change resolution under Windows, all the text changes physical size but uses the same number of pixels. Under Linux, the text stays roughtly the same (physical) size and just uses more or less pixels.

  133. Good question. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    You might want to try using more recent drivers (Such as the most recent Detonators plus modified .INF hack - Best place to find info is the community forums on Dell's support site.) - They might be more predictable.

    I've never been very happy with the state of multiple monitor support under Windows. It seems very unpredictable.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  134. 15.4" Screen replacement cost by Small+Hairy+Troll · · Score: 1

    I just recently broke the 15.4" LCD display on my Dell Inspiron notebook. Cost to replace: $1060.

    1. Re:15.4" Screen replacement cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, Was the breakage your fault or a design/manufacturing fault?

  135. Re:Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by FallLine · · Score: 1

    Ummm, you may try updating the bios (and possibly the video drivers). I had a similar annoyance with my docking station after I put XP on it. The bios update solved that problem and a couple others.

  136. Price Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see $2299 or $899 + $1400 of Beer
    assuming $1 per bottle (good stuff) or $.50 per can so-so stuff thats 1400 - 2800 bottles of beer on the wall your eye sight is going to be shot anyway so drink up!!!!

  137. Sounds like my current powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 1ghz powerbook (15.2", latest model) came with a combo drive (no DVD-R), 1gb ram, Radeon 9000, wide screen (12something by 8something) and was under $3300 *with Applecare*. It sounds like it's everything you're asking for, minus the ultra-high-resolution screen that's too hard for normal people to read. My tibook doesn't flake, and the airport reception is a lot better than on previous models. So what are you waiting for?

  138. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

    True, you don't know me, but I am a sysadmin for a division of the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs... I've got about 150 machines that I support with regularity (and another 150 or so that I support on an as-needed basis), a growing number of which are dells (rather than whiteboxes that were built by my predecessor's predecessor... none to well cared for either, dust contamination out the kazoo, but anyway). I have found Dell's support to scale directly with the amount of money that you spend on their systems. For low-end machines, you get crap, but if you spent 6500 dollars per box decking out one of their top of the line systems (inspiron 8200 when it VERY FIRST came out... 12 of them....eesh) or a couple of dozen Precision workstations, their tech support is on your doorstep within hours after you call them (even if you're like me and hate letting them touch the boxes... half the time I don't let them, I'm very particular about who I trust with them (one chance to prove yourself to me, if you screw it up and try coming back too bad for you) it's sad that I'm on a first name basis with half of the Dell support techs in the state) but yeah... it's still ENORMOUSLY better than compaq/hp and IBM put together (and I'll not even get into my problems with sony). Dunno where I'm going with this really, maybe trying to say that they're the best you can get from a big OEM? Probably that, yeah.

    --
    -----------------------------------------
    Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
  139. Re:No, YOU'RE ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    up yours, motherfucker (no - you rock)

  140. Impressive DVD viewing for increased productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I quote, "Aspect displays deliver impressive DVD viewing and additional screen area for increased productivity." This is an interesting cross between poor writing and corporate toy purchase psuedo-rationalization.

  141. Still no DVI ports by Proc6 · · Score: 1

    With LCD's being pushed so hard, even to the point of some predicting the extinction of CRT, why do $3,000 notebooks only come with 15-pin VGA connector outs? high resolution LCD panels running through analog signals suuuuucckkkk.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:Still no DVI ports by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Oh I dunno about that, I have a ~US$3000 laptop with DVI-I out on it ;)

      It's silvery coloured with a white bit around the outside, a 1280x854 screen with this glowing white logo on the back of it which looks really funky and a slot loading DVD/CD-RW drive..

      No floppy drive, but I don't miss it.

  142. I stand corrected by Merlin42 · · Score: 1

    I ran my numbers assuming 16:9 (since HDTV was mentioned) when in fact this panel is 16:10 wich gives square pixels.

    I guess I got a little carried away ... I was just explaining why circles wouldnt be perfect circles on a standard 4:3 crt running at 1280x1024(5:4) to a very picky lUser the other day and I guess it made me jump to conclusions here. This particular user still can't understand why taking a 1inch by 2inch image and blowing it up to 2inch by 3inch distorts things.

    I guess the only nonsquare-pixel panels I know of for sure are in PDAs.

  143. He's got a great question - Can anyone answer? by ctwxman · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the resolution on this display or the 1400x1050 on my Sony laptop are excellent. I, for one, can use all the real estate I can get. Yet, if I want to buy a 15" LCD monitor for home, I'm stcuk with 1024x768. Why aren't there stand along LCD monitors with higher resolutions, like these laptops? Geoff Fox

    1. Re:He's got a great question - Can anyone answer? by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Try this one:

      http://www.iiyama.com/web2002/product/32p_5611.h tm

      A rocking 3840*2400!

      Kosi

  144. Laptop Weight by m0rningstar · · Score: 1

    You know...

    This while discussion centers on what you use the laptop for. In a desktop replacement that gets moved around occasionally -- sure 7-8lbs is fine. But my T23 is in for repair and I'm back to a Inspiron 7500 and I've noticed the difference. On the other hand, I haul it around a lot, move from office to office on customer sites etc, and one of my primary reasons for the IBM was weight.

    As to the military? Last time I was packing that sort of load and gear, the webbing was MUCH better designed to distribute it than the average laptop bag. And. Well. Why should I suffer if I don't have to?

    1. Re:Laptop Weight by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Myt Targus backpack dsitributes my whopping 8 pound laptop's weight just fine

    2. Re:Laptop Weight by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      "As to the military? Last time I was packing that sort of load and gear, the webbing was MUCH better designed to distribute it than the average laptop bag. And. Well. Why should I suffer if I don't have to?" Apparently you haven't tried the new MOLLE gear, have you? Seriously, 7 pounds isn't that much.

  145. And then you realize... by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    ... that it's a Dell, dude. Prepare to carry around a heavy, ugly chunk of black plastic that will have it's keyboard malfunction once every six months.

    Think different :-)

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  146. [Apple and 1920x1200 res] Re:Ah, lets compare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple does not offer a 1920x1200 laptop display,
    although it does offer a desktop display with
    this resolution, right? It's described at:
    http://www.apple.com/displays/acd23/

    Surely, though, Apple's operating system with
    Quartz Extreme rendering system is well-suited
    to these higher resolution displays. I think they
    have yet to really exploit the smooth image
    scaling performance of Quartz Extreme,
    which sends all windows images through the
    OpenGL pipeline as textures. 60Hz scaling and
    compositing is just waiting to be used...

  147. Notebook? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    ``(much faster than the ATI Radeon 9000), and you've got quite a notebook!!''
    But can you actually take notes with it? I mean, does it have a decent battery life, or are you basically tied to the wall by it's hunger for power?
    If it has a limited battery life, why not get a desktop machine that has better specs for a lower price? Desktop machines for speed, notebooks for battery life.

    ---
    `NT' (as in Windows NT) is short for `No Thanks'.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  148. Bitch, Whine, Moan... by craenor · · Score: 1

    You people do nothing but complain sometimes. The fact is that Dell has the best notebooks available for the pc platform (non-Mac). I won't even compare to Mac, they have two different thigns.

    Dell offers the best product, the best available options and the best service and support of any company making computers in the world.

    If you buy a wireless router and wireless cards from them. Not only will their wireless team setup the network for you on all of your non-Dell computers as well, but they'll also help you install and setup the workgroup network for file and print sharing. Find another company that will do that, I dare you...

    Craenor

  149. No docking port by covertlaw · · Score: 1
    Hey!

    I was all set to eBay my 9 month old Inspiron 8200, but there's no docking port on this new machine, the modem/network connectors have been moved to the back, only one PC card slot is available, and there's no difference in the video hardware, save for the wider screen.

    Instead of calling it the 8500, they should have named it the 9200 or something because it's a completely different case and LCD design. Most of the parts in the 8000 class are interchangeable, save for the memory, processor, and motherboards.

    Nope, I'm keeping my trusty i8200. A wide screen really isn't THAT important of an upgrade, and I really like the handy docking station for at-home usage. Nine months on Windows XP Pro with no blue screens, and it still dusts off ever other notebook, except for the other i8200's, in my law school class. Even the Macs :)

    1. Re:No docking port by craenor · · Score: 1

      Actually, the docking connector is on the bottom of the system, so it "sits" in the APR (advanced port replicator).

      As for the difference in the video hardware. This is an nvidia 4200 go...the old card was an nvidia 440 go, based off of the mx series. The 4200 go is a much, much faster video card.

      They've added a bigger battery for the power draw as well.

      It's a nice system, good upgrades.

  150. What about that Lindows laptop? by t0ny · · Score: 1
    What, you guys dont want to get that over-priced and under-powered Lindows laptop that was slashdotted two weeks ago?

    WTF? You guys let me down...

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  151. you don't quite seem to understand by g4dget · · Score: 1
    2G of RAM means two 1G DIMMs for the laptop. If you can get those at all, they are outrageously expensive. Even 512M DIMMS cost quite a premium. All the laptop vendors are in the same boat as far as I can tell.

    Note that a 512M 1-DIMM configuration costs $200 more than a 512M 2-DIMM configuration.

    But... if you can point me at a source of cheap 512M or 1G DIMMS for notebooks, I'd be really happy.

  152. My Dell, other side of the coin by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    My company BRIEFLY bought Dell desktops and laptops. (This company purchases between ten and twenty thousand PCs a year, and about 500 servers.)

    My Dell Latitude c600 has been nothing but junk. It sits on my desk all day (since I do VPN from home, I don't need to tote the machine), and yet it has had two failed hard drives. The screen has started to develop bizarre blue and magenta artifacts, which can only be cleared up by wiggling and flexing the display. The trackpad "jumps" if you try to use it (I switched to an external trackball). When the CPU is under heavy duress, a hairdryer-esque fan turns out and shoots plasma-hot air aross my right hand on the trackball.

    The first time I actually had to travel with it, it lost it's battery charge in 15 minutes and threw up a warning to shut down, and then shut itself down.

    Our desktops proved to be generally OK, but well above the price IBM was offering (once service contacts were negotiated).

    Our company buys IBMs now. I'm getting a T30 this month. Woot. :)

  153. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by mosch · · Score: 1
    You've never had any problems with Dell service or support? As somebody who used to work at a 2,000 employee firm that gave nearly every employee a Dell laptop, I can assure you that you're lucky. We often had several dozen machines that were stuck in a cycle of us->dell->us->dell->us...

    Their business level machines are alright, the personal machines are pretty much shit, and the service and support requires a lot of patience. Sad to say, they're one of the better PC manufacturers despite their shoddy service department.

  154. Beautiful Bottoms by BohemianCoast · · Score: 1

    When I took delivery of my iMac, I was astonished to discover that the brushed metal underside of it was more beautiful than any part of any computer I'd previously owned.

  155. Bigger fonts? by moz25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would it help to set the fonts bigger or isn't that an option?

    1. Re:Bigger fonts? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Would it help to set the fonts bigger or isn't that an option?"

      Yeah, you can. Although my experience with Win2k (my laptop is XP and they MIGHT have fixed that) is that changing the font size can screw things up, especially web browsing. I've noticed that setting the fonts to larger can mangle table sizes on websites and break them. I've also noticed that text doesn't always fit in its buttons like the 'submit' button.

      Also for me in particular, this is a problem because I bought my laptop to run Lightwave. The buttons on it are fixed-width fonts, and they do not respond to fonts designated by the Windows theme. I cannot change the font on it that I know of. So for me (I doubt a significant amount of people have this laptop and run Lightwave on it...) that's not an option.

      Things might be different in XP, but I wouldn't count on it. Either the text will be the wrong size and break the page, or it'll be too small, thus defeating the purpose of it. Fortunately, I use Opera and it has a true magnification button instead of changing the font size.

    2. Re:Bigger fonts? by jbolden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Mozilla for this. I.E.'s font resizing is terrible.

    3. Re:Bigger fonts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change the DPI to 130 or more rather then the font size then get some decent icons like the Faux set of icons that go up to 72x72.

    4. Re:Bigger fonts? by u02sgb · · Score: 1

      Nope I've found the same with XP. You also have problems with applications not written for it if you increase the DPI (not able to view all of the screen components as everything is resized etc) and if you want to see the screen components it requires changing the DPI back and rebooting:(. Mozilla is super handy for this problem as you can increse the "Text zoom" accsibility feature to 300% and view everything normally. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any way to set this as the default and a new tab or new window reverts back to 100% fonts.

  156. It's 2249 for an 867 and 2699 for a 1000 (w/dvd) by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    If I get it from a dealer (like ClubMac). I don't pay tax $207.92 (8%) on the 1GHz model if I don't custom configure without the drive from Apple.

    So A) I can buy it from Apple for $2599 (w/o DVDR) and pay 8% tax which is $2806.92 (free shipping) OR
    I can B) buy it from ClubMac w/o Tax and (free shipping) for $2699

    Hmmm... which makes more sense? I'll wait for the new 15.4" (since dell beat them to the punch) and it should (hopefully) push the prices a little lower on the TiBook. If they cost the same I'll get the new one (compare the Old 1.25GHz Dual G4 Tower to the new one, the new one is significantly cheaper).

  157. UltraSharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm mildly surprised that no one picked up on the link to Dell's new LCD technology: UltraSharp. The WUXGA screen is less impressive to me than the fact that the viewing angle and image quality have increased dramatically.

  158. Re:First Gig-E notebook? by justMichael · · Score: 1

    I will assume you have never spec'ed a TiBook...

    The 15" and up models have Gig-E and have had it for quite a while.

  159. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by xTown · · Score: 1

    (I know you have no idea who I am.)

    I worked at a school district in the upper midwest; we were an almost entirely-Dell shop. We had around 6000 network nodes when I left, and 3,000+ of those were Dells. We loved the Dells; in contrast to the Apples, they never broke down. In fact, the only time I needed to get a Dell machine repaired was when I blew out a motherboard with some faulty RAM. We hated installing new machines, but we always knew that we could plug the Dells in and they would work.

  160. Inspiron 4000 by bogie · · Score: 1

    PIII 900
    etc

    Got a new hard drive out of own pocket because of the Hitachi "clicking" problem. No the bios update didn't help that much.

    The trackpad is a piece of shit and goes nuts if I don't have the Synaptics software's "Plam Check" feature turned all the way up. This btw makes using Linux impossible for more than 5 minutes because of the random mouse freakouts. (Great I'm stuck with POS windows, thanks Dell)

    The lower part of the screen makes a buzzing noise like a fluorescent light about to burn out. I'm told this may be due to some sort of faulty fan.

    I had to replace the POS Actiontec network card/modem because it couldn't do 100MB without crashing.

    In short my impression of Dell laptops is that they are pieces of shit. I won't ever be buying another one again nor allowing any of my clients when possible.

    The only thing those assholes at dell would replace for me is that NIC/modem. Fuck dell and their shitty trackpads and poor quality laptops. Next time I'll buy an IBM.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  161. Your not alone by bogie · · Score: 1

    My Inspiron is a total piece of shit as well. If your interested in the details click my profile, my last post before this was all the problems I had.

    Dell may make decent whitebox/generic desktops, but I don't have that good an impression of their laptops. A trip to their support forums confirms that for me.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  162. Can't wait to get my hands on one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, timothy, I bet you can buy one with what they paid you for this slashvertisement.

  163. Re: DPI settings in Mozilla by abischof · · Score: 1

    You are setting the DPI in Mozilla itself, right? (Edit -> Preferences -> Appearance -> Fonts -> Display Resolution)

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  164. Too bad it runs XP... by reidconti · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I was happy with Linux when I ran that on my desktop for 7 years. I was even happier when I bought my ibook (my first Mac ever) last March.

    I've used my roommate's Inspiron 8200 with XP a few times. It's an expensive laptop -- probably cost a pretty penny more than my ibook.

    It's crap. I mean, I think Dell does an OK job, and I know their support (at least for servers) is quite good.. If I were to buy a PC rather than build it, Dell would be the way to go... But XP is just a joke. I think not using Windows for so long led me to believe that it was probably catching up to the rest of the world, just not quite for me.. Well, it's not. The Mac really has spoiled me, to the point where I can't even imagine why someone would buy an ugly, heavy PC notebook running a clunky, kludge of an OS like Windows. At least when I used Linux, I could use a Windows box, and say "hey, at least it has some worthwhile apps." Now I can't even say that about Windows anymore, it's just a nightmare experience.

    - reid

  165. Re:Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by jrcamp · · Score: 1

    You cut the FUD. I also own a 8200. I'd take a wild guess and say the guy has a Geforce2. This has been the shittiest card made to date. It would either have a fatal error or lock up just about once a day. Dell never released any working drivers with acceptable performance. This problem doesn't exist with the GeForce4, which I upgraded to recently.

  166. A Titanium PowerBook is CHEAPER by st.+jude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, it's a 15.2 instead of a 15.4 (at least until the update, expected in the next couple of weeks), but check out this side-by-side comparison: If you configure a 15 inch PowerBook with the best processor (1GHz) and make the components match as much as possible: Apple Titanium PowerBook: 15.2 inch Widescreen Display (Max. Res. 1280x854, plenty for a screen this size!) 1GHz PowerPC G4 Processor 60GB Ultra ATA Hard Drive Combo Drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW) Wireless Networking (AirPort) 512 MB SDRAM - 1 DIMM ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 w. 64MB DDR SDRAM Height: 1.0 inch (2.6 cm) Width: 13.4 inches (34.1 cm) Depth: 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) Weight: 5.4 pounds (2.45 kg) with battery and optical drive installed Price: $ 2,699.00 Dell Inspiration 8500: 15.4 inch Widescreen Display (Max. Res. 1920x1200) 2.4GHz Mobile Pentium 4 Processor 60GB Ultra ATA Hard Drive Combo Drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW) Wireless Networking (802.11a/b) 512 MB DDR SDRAM - 1 DIMM nVidia GeForce 4 4200 Go w. 64MB DDR SDRAM Height: 1.52-inch (3.86 cm) Width: 14.22-inch (36.12 cm) Depth: 10.87-inch (27.61 cm) Weight: 6.9 lbs. (3.13 kg) with travel module, battery and Hard Drive Price: $ 2,927.00 Price difference: the thicker, taller, wider, HEAVIER, insanely hideous Dell costs $228 more. Sure, we could have another endless MHz myth discussion. But seriously, step back a second and just think about this. You can get the Mac for less than the Dell. Some of you may want to look out the window and check for porcine aviators.

  167. Just don't buy it from Dell EUROPE!! by antoniol · · Score: 0, Troll

    I ordered an Inspiron 8200 back in August '02 and still didn't get it! And I paid in advance, in cash, $2150. Dealing with this company (German branch) was the nightmare of a lifetime. They screwed up my order on every level, in every way imaginable or unimaginable. And after each screwup, the respective droid would be unattainable over the phone or email, and I would get another one.

    After a mindboggling amount of my time and patience had been wasted, I finally just got my money back last January (not a dime in compensation). Surprise: they screwed up and wired me the money twice, then sent me a rude dunning letter asking for the extra amount, even before I discovered the double refund!

    Then the other day, the mess lands on the desk of an escalation manager, who offers me a $100 discount if I try to order it again! That's the absolute top offer they're making! The manager told me that something like this lands on his desk about once a week! Other European countries are supposedly similar. Small wonder they don't have customer forums on the European web pages! Be forewarned!

    1. Re:Just don't buy it from Dell EUROPE!! by antoniol · · Score: 1

      Why troll? Does the moderator work for Dell? I wrote nothing but the honest truth, as amazing as that may seem.

  168. Mac VS PC Laptops? HELLO by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    What is with some of you guys who bring up the whole mac vs PC fight?

    STOP IT just STOP IT! I'm so so sick of it.

    They are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BEASTS, they run different software etc etc!
    Sure a mac might be useful for somethings, hell it might be easier, faster and cheaper? (?) for some things but here's the key word - SOME THINGS.

    If you're a "PC guy" like myself a mac isn't an option - it's as simple as that - I don't want one EVER it doesn't suit my NEEDS.

    Sure some of you will say I'm therefore one of those "short sighted" PC guys, but that's how it is, if you don't know it, don't understand it, and you know it's not as common as a PC notebook (I've never seen a modern mac notebook in real life) then you simply won't want to buy it.

  169. Nvidia + Laptops Suck by mushroom+couch · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked (31/01/03) Nvidia's linux drivers will not suspend to disk or ram without a (very questionable) hack of the source code. What good is this machine for a Linux user?

  170. It ain't worth the MicroSoft(TM) tax.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said...

  171. Why by Onan · · Score: 1

    Remember, there are people out there who actually _create_ content, not just consume it.

  172. I can't believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are people out there who are still running Proprietary Dell Systems?

  173. Limits of DVI-D by doormat · · Score: 2, Informative

    You cant go above 12x10 on a standards LCD because a stardard single DVI-D link can only supply that much information to the monitor. A dual DVI-D link could provide 1920x1200, but no videocards seem to implement dual DVI.

    See http://www.rell.com/pdfs/DSG_ssLCD-240t.pdf -- Maximum Digital Resolution: 1280x1024 @60Hz

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Limits of DVI-D by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      yes, that is true: on paper one dvi-d link caps out at 165Mhz, which apparently specs out to 1600x1200. However, it _is_ possible to get a single DVI-D link to drive 19x12: Witness that people have gotten both the sony 23", Apple 23", and Samsung 24" driven digitally buy off the shelf cards that only supply single-link DVI (as you say, no card on the market provides dual-link DVI-D).

      To whit, the ATI 9700 Pro has been verified to work even though it shouldn't. I'm currently installing Xfree 4.3.0 to try to drive an ATI 9000 Pro at that resolution. If it doesn't work, Dell get the p232w back. The Apple 23 inch is driven over single link DVI (well, ADC, which is DVI-D +other cables), and that is the offical way to do it.

      This is contrary to what both ATI's marketing AND specs say. The common claim is that the blanking delay, which is there as a holdover from analog days, can be be used to push the additional 3600+ pixels per redraw to the monitor. Alternately, you can feed it less than 60hz.

      Reminds you of the old joke: the american asks the frenchman about his new theory "Yes, but does it work in practice?", while the frenchman asks about the american's prototype "well, does yours work in theory?"

    2. Re:Limits of DVI-D by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      That's unusual; didn't the designers of DVI realize that we'd someday be using higher resolutions? Why limit it so much from the start?

  174. I would not get it by mpost4 · · Score: 1

    I have had nothing but trouble with the Inspiron 5000e, and from what has happend with it, and with tech support with he^h^hdell I will never (I will repeat that NEVER) buy a dell computer ever again.

    I have trouble with the Bios (see the linux source code the problem with the bios and apm is well documented)

    The flamable battery

    Bad had drive controller

    bad ir port

    Having problem with the power in it, it will just lose power for no reason. (the batterys are fully charged and pluged in) Then it will not turn on wene I press the power button, I have to open it up to redo the connection in there.

    Tech support even for just hardware problems, oh the nightmares

    for those reasons I will never get a dell again.

  175. hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be Careful you brought all the Apple fanboys out who had to say how much better their apple notebooks are!

  176. I Found a Typo! by imadcow1 · · Score: 1

    Processor: Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4-M up to 2.4 GHZ. The Intel 845MP chipset is optimizd for use with the Mobile Pentium 4 processors and ratchets the Processor Support Bus (PSB) to 400MHz.

    Do I get a free laptop?

  177. Re:Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last batch of Nvidia drivers blue screened my desktop (GeF3 Ti200) every couple of weeks, the first set to do so in three years of using their cards. The Windows Update version were very old last I checked.

  178. faster... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    much faster than the ATI Radeon 9000

    Wow... it beats the shitty version of the directx 9 compatible cards produced by ATI... that says a lot...

  179. Re:Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by Patrick · · Score: 1
    Oh yeah, and it runs Linux beautifully too.

    The nVidia cards (the GeForce2Go, anyway) keep APM suspend/hibernate from working under Linux. Pretty and fast, yes. "Running beautifully," perhaps not. I'd trade a few 3-D FPS for the ability to suspend the machine.

  180. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by philovivero · · Score: 1

    Problems with Dell products and support may not be universal, but they are definitely not unusual.

  181. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Problems with Dell products and support may not be universal, but they are definitely not unusual [faemalia.org].

    Maybe it's time for someone (who knows how) to start a thread about Dell's current service -- good or bad.

    Does seem that most of the complaints here are about laptop/notebooks, which I believe Dell outsources.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  182. CNet's Review of Inspiron 8500 by Totally_Tux · · Score: 1

    If anybody is interested, Cnet has a review of the machines (dated 5th March).

    http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-1027-404-20 89 3611.html?tag=ld

    It received 8.3/10, the machine's strong point were it's performance, screen size (aspect more suited for viewing DVDs) and surprisingly battery life. Another factor is the two inbuilt WiFi antennas, which Dell's 802.11b/g mini-PCI card takes advantage of.

    Weaker points mentioned in the review were the flimsy keyboard and mouse buttons.
    No mention was made as for the machine's build quality - but I guess that is rather subjective.

    The 8500 also appears to be lighter and thinner than it's predecessor 8200 (6.9lb 1.5" vs 7.6lb 1.7").

  183. Re:Hey everybody, lets count the.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    COOL! Both this and the parent were modded down to -1 at the same time, by the same moderator, and with the same rating, "Overrated". Yeah, an AC with a rating of Zero is overrated.

    But it's not a "troll", it's just "overrated", something that should be lowered down for no good reason except that we don't want it to be seen by others...

    Censorship is alive and well, and it lives here in Slashdot! Viva la Macintosh!

  184. Re:Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    It's an issue with anything running NVidia's binary drivers.

    It's possible to get APM working with those drivers with a minor source tweak and disabling AGP.

    Everything else under the laptop works flawlessly.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  185. Eye strain by slashuzer · · Score: 1

    I understand your point completely, but since I don't game much, I need the lcd's. The eyestrain is so much lower after hours of coding. Or reading slashdot ;-)

  186. Upgrade possible?? by Doomsday314 · · Score: 1

    I haven't looked at the datasheets for the displays but is it possible to upgrade the 1280 x 800 15.4" with the 1920 x 1200 15.4" panel? Are they the same form factor? Are they electrically the same? Same LVDS drivers? I assume the OS would detect the max resolution of the panel? Just wondering if it's an option...

  187. Re:Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by Patrick · · Score: 1
    It's possible to get APM working with those drivers with a minor source tweak and disabling AGP.

    I've tried it and had no luck. Even the people who've made it work say it still crashes occasionally. The closest I've come is that I can close X, remove the NVdriver, and then suspend the machine. That's not much use.

  188. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    "I said I hope it is a good party," said Galder, loudly.
    "AT THE MOMENT IT IS," said Death levelly. "I THINK IT MIGHT GO
    DOWNHILL VERY QUICKLY AT MIDNIGHT."
    "Why?"
    "THAT'S WHEN THEY THINK I'LL BE TAKING MY MASK OFF."
    -- Terry Pratchett, "The Light Fantastic"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...