Slashdot Mirror


SuSE 8.2 Announced

Venotar writes "It looks like SuSE's once more setting the bar pretty high. According to their recent announcement, SuSE 8.2's release date is set for April 12th. Amongst other nifty features, KDE 3.1 apparently includes tabbed browsing, the ability to sync with Exchange servers, a new administration tool called "Desktop sharing" that allows remote control of other desktops, and several interesting new crypto/security features. Gnome 2.2 is also included, as well as a profile manager for mobile users, and gcc 3.3. Have a lot of fun!"

456 comments

  1. SuSE doing it 8.2:th time! by sokkelih · · Score: 4, Funny

    Desktop revolution for the 8.2:th time.

    1. Re:SuSE doing it 8.2:th time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sing along, kids!

      lets hear it for gandalf.

    2. Re:SuSE doing it 8.2:th time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're Swedish/Finnish, right? Hejdå!

    3. Re:SuSE doing it 8.2:th time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they come out with 8.3 soon there after. The reason is that so far I have allways bought x.3, or x.4 versions of SUSE all the way back to 4.3 (Kernel 2.0.12 ... oh well back in those days ...

      Anyhow, maybe by then we will have Kernel 2.6.x. :)

  2. MMMMM Suse by batboy78 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sure miss the day when you could download the ISO's for free. I think that is why Mandrake is so appealing.

    1. Re:MMMMM Suse by RTPMatt · · Score: 1

      ya know, i got a free copy of suse 7.2 pro from a class i took, and I loved it. w/o ISO's its just too horrible trying to install a new version...so i guess im stuck...so how am i gonna have a lot a fun!?

    2. Re:MMMMM Suse by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      I'll say MMMM Suse when I see some MMMMm screenshots!

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    3. Re:MMMMM Suse by dago · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that mandrake did fill for bankrupcy end of last year ?

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    4. Re:MMMMM Suse by StarTux · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well you can get it via FTP about a month after release for free.

      Personnally I don't miss ISO's.

      StarTux

    5. Re:MMMMM Suse by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that Mandrake filing for bankruptcy had nothing to do with them providing or not providing free .iso's, and everything to do with mismanagement by former company officers?

      Mandrake is almost to break even after (I think, number might be off) 18 months of flushing money down the toilet by a "high profile" CEO. So cut them some slack, eh?

      Chris

    6. Re:MMMMM Suse by dotgain · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can't understand how people can judge a distro by screenshots. A screenshot of a Newsreader, Media Player, fine, it can give you at least an idea of what it looks like.

      But a distro doesn't look like anything. You'd like a screenshot of Redhat 8, but use it, and you'd soon change your mind.

    7. Re:MMMMM Suse by j-pimp · · Score: 1
      Well I really dont see how burning a small boot ISO (~16 megs) or making 2 disks is hard.
      • Find a fast mirror (got a few good ones in the US).
      • Install whatever you think is the bare minimim for you, being sure to include ftp so yast can download additional stuff later, and lynx to start installing Helixcode. Also install X, but if your not installing X your not installing Helixcode. (do not install gnome your gonna use helix stuff.
      • After the installation is finished start up X, open an xterm and type xhost +localhost; su root -c "lynx -source http://go-gnome.com", and install helix.
      • now you got yourself a system.
      if your installing to several systems make a local mirror of the 8.3 dir on ftp.suse.com and enjoy some lightening fast 100MBps network installs. When I buy Suse CD sets I copy the DVD to a server on the network and install/upgrade via ftp/NFS. its quite rare I do a CD or DVD install.
      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    8. Re:MMMMM Suse by jbolden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just to add to this. Mandrake the distribution has been highly profitable for years. Mandrake corporation is in trouble because of E-education contracts. If they did nothing but sell a distribution they'd be fine.

    9. Re:MMMMM Suse by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Redhat is a really nice distro if you ask me.

      --
      Martin
    10. Re:MMMMM Suse by dago · · Score: 1

      The actual status of Suse and mandrake is a consequence of decisions taken within those two enterprises.

      And, IMHO, such decisions are part of the global orientation and general culture of the enterprises.

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    11. Re:MMMMM Suse by littleRedFriend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, my point!

      I am a very busy, but I absolutely need the latest Linux desktop stuff (KDE 3.1 rulez). I go and mirror an archive or two from Suse. It won't install, not even several hours of Googling, tweaking installation script files, re-arranging partitions and file systems. I give up. I know that in theory it could be done, but they make it very confusing on purpose (and it changes every version).

      Now they are a company and need to make money. So far so good. However, it is not me who will buy the boxed set of CDs. It is way too expensive, when I know that in a couple of weeks I absolutely need to play with a new kernel, KDE 3.2, GNOME 2.something. Which renders my boxed distro worthless, without investing in getting intimately familiar with all the dependencies of glibc, bonobo and whatever.

      I would buy the boxed set, if they would allow me to download (in ISO format), Suse version 8.2 - 10 for example. I would even pay for that. Does this exist?

      In the meantime I am running Mandrake 9.1RC1 at work, and it sort of works very well. Productivity is up (mainly because I use a lot of terminals to connect to big iron). I haven't booted windows in more than two weeks. That is a record for me, a MS outlook/office slave for the last 10 years. Will certainly install 9.1 final when it comes out.

      It must be true, the Linux desktop experience (tm) is coming.

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    12. Re:MMMMM Suse by platypus · · Score: 1

      Install whatever you think is the bare minimim for you, being sure to include ftp so yast can download additional stuff later

      I think yast[2] uses wget for downloading. The absolutely nasty thing is that wget is _not_ listed as a dependecy for yast[2], and that yast2 just tells you that it can't contact the server instead of complaining about a missing wget, if wget is not installed. Cost me an hour to find out.

    13. Re:MMMMM Suse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I sure miss the day when you could download the ISO's for free.

      You can...

      ...on Usenet

    14. Re:MMMMM Suse by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      SuSE still provide this, although it does tend to trail behind the CD release...but what the hey, they do need to get paid every so often, so this seems a decent compromise to me i.e. if you simply *must* have it as soon as it is released then be ready to pony up a little cash - otherwise, it'll be there soon enough.

      Remember, all the stuff they provide (except YAST/etc) can be downloaded/compiled/installed at any time.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    15. Re:MMMMM Suse by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 0

      Chapter 11 is not backruptcy but protection from creditors. It's a bad sign, but not the same as actually being bankrupt.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    16. Re:MMMMM Suse by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

      Wow - that's a nasty one. You should definitely file a bug report on that!

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:MMMMM Suse by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am a very busy

      Well you must be, if you don't even have time to read over your Slashdot posts!

      But, uh, that does get me thinking ... if you have time to post on Slashdot at all, you can't possibly be that busy....

      --
      Fuck it
    18. Re:MMMMM Suse by negyvenot · · Score: 3, Informative
      Have you ever tried network install with Suse? All you have to do is to download the boot ISO image from a Suse mirror, and install Suse over network (current/boot/boot.iso, approx 18MB). It took about an hour and a half on my ~400kbps DSL connection to get a minimal system with core X running.

      The smallest configuration with X gives you a nice desktop with all the GUI configuration tools. Then all you have to do is start up YAST and install KDE to have the default configuration. While the download goes on, you can already configure the rest of your OS. I did this with Suse 8.1, should work with this version as well.

    19. Re:MMMMM Suse by chadm1967 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I could create a screenshot of Debian running mozilla and tell you it's SuSE. Screenshots mean nothing......

    20. Re:MMMMM Suse by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Thats why I love strace. Almost all programs have very nonuseful output, but a quick strace will tell me the problem.
      An example being I had two eggdrops that would disconnect after linking without giving an exact reason why, and I couldnt find any docs explaining it. Quick strace and I saw it was trying to make a connection to a local address, so I specified the ip in the config and it worked like a charm.

      Since then I've been hitting strace before docs as it usually solves the problem.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    21. Re:MMMMM Suse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can download a boot ISO from suse.com and then do the rest of the install via ftp, it worked great for me.

    22. Re:MMMMM Suse by platypus · · Score: 1

      Indeed, strace is a very useful tool even for non (C-)programmers. And guess how I found out about that absymal error handling bug stated above in just an hour? ;)

      The problem here was that in this case I just thought I had misconfigured something (this was a new install on a new hardware) in yast, and tried out different setting for mirrors etc.

    23. Re:MMMMM Suse by reallocate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> Now they are a company and need to make money. So far so good. However, it is not me who will buy the boxed set of CDs. It is way too expensive...

      Well, if they now know that you're not going to buy it, it doesn't make much sense for SuSe to give it away for free, thereby cutting into sales to people who would otherwise pay for it.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    24. Re:MMMMM Suse by k8to · · Score: 1

      Quack quack quack?

      Are you trying to install SuSE Packages on SuSE? If so, why aren't you just using the update service to make them automaticially bling onto your drive?

      If you're trying to install SuSE packages on some other distribution, you're an idiot.

      --
      -josh
    25. Re:MMMMM Suse by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's why Mandrake has to beg the community to fork over some money every few months.

    26. Re:MMMMM Suse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am a very busy, but I absolutely need the latest Linux desktop stuff (KDE 3.1 rulez). I go and mirror an archive or two from Suse. It won't install, not even several hours of Googling, tweaking installation script files, re-arranging partitions and file systems. I give up.

      If you're looking to try out SuSE and are a very busy, download the live-eval ISO image. Burn it, boot, and run from CD. No need to struggle with scripts, partitions or file systems.

      BTW, if you absulutely need the latest, you may want to consider a source distribution like gentoo. These are usually the most up-to-date distros with the latest goods.

      And curiously, if (KDE 3.1 rulez), why SuSE? 8.2 will be the first SuSE release with KDE 3.1. The current release, SuSE 8.1, ships with KDE 3.0.3. I suppose you could update to KDE 3.1 after installing. But then again, you could do that with any distribution (read: one that you are familiar with).

    27. Re:MMMMM Suse by kavau · · Score: 1

      Mileage usually varies quite a bit when it comes to installing Linux on different machines. But the last time I installed a SuSE Linux distribution (which was version 7.3, so I might be a bit out of date here...) all I had to do was to make a boot floppy disk for FTP install, reboot, sit back and wait a while... no fiddling, everything worked out of the box. In my experience, an operating system install can't possibly be any easier. Installing new packages and updating existing ones is also done by point-and-click and works extremely smoothly for me. The only gripe I have is that SuSE doesn't support winmodems (unfortunately many laptops come with such an abomination), but that's more the manufacturer's fault for not disclosing the specs, I think... (on the other hand, why can RedHat support them, and SuSE can't?)

    28. Re:MMMMM Suse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuSE allows one to do a network install from their FTP server, at no cost. All you need do is create the boot & module disks, and follow the instructions on their website. You, of course, get no support.

      This option is handy for all those who do not have a CDRW.

    29. Re:MMMMM Suse by Chester+K · · Score: 1

      Well, if they now know that you're not going to buy it, it doesn't make much sense for SuSe to give it away for free, thereby cutting into sales to people who would otherwise pay for it.

      Ladies and gentlemen, here is the core reason that the record industry wants to shut down illegal file sharing of their copyrighted songs.

      --

      NO CARRIER
    30. Re:MMMMM Suse by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      SuSE have changed their policy towards continuous updated during the last year or two. Nowadays the official updates for the rpms you bought on the CD are limited to serious bugfixes (if you're lucky) and security updates.

      Version numbr upgrades for mozilla and the kernel itself are only available on an unofficial basis from the /pub/projects and /pub/people tress respectively. These are in a perpetual state of beta (but this is deliberate, that is why they are there). They place any major updates to XFree86, KDE and GNOME in a separate "supplementary" tree. The READMEs say all of these are not officially supported so you install them at your own risk. Moreover the quality of these RPMs, particularly as regards dependency resolution, is much lower than the older ones in the main distribution. i.e. there are almost always some fairly severe dependency issues. For example if you upgrade the mozilla version then many of the gnome apps stop working as they depend on the mozilla libs.

      It might seem like a retrograde step from the good ole days when you had an unending supply of free upgrades but lets face it, everybody is hurtng these days and if SuSE didn't take a more balanced approach they would soon be out of business.

      It particularly galls me to see so many people admitting that they won't pay SuSE a farthing and just prefer to leech ISO's off their ftp site. Keep this up people, and soon there'll be nothing left but debian and slackware. Yeah, just like the good old days.

    31. Re:MMMMM Suse by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Hope its good old ftp. But your right about ftp not being a yast dependancy, or part of the default install. It took me a while to figure out what the hells wrong with yast.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  3. SuSE and Red Hat by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    SuSE and Red Hat are the last professional distributions left in my opinion. I'm not very impressed with Mandrake overall. They seem to be a bunch of amateurs.

    SuSE's offerings are just plain mouth-watering. Red Hat is a bit of a controversial choice with overboard desktop nullification but the core is very good. SuSE's desktop is AWESOME.

    When it comes to package managers, SuSE also has much better network updates and doesn't require a paid subscription like Red Hat. The paid subscription is major bummer indeed.

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    1. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RedHat updates are free, you just don't get the priority servers.

      If you use free servers, best to do updates during off hours.

    2. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When it comes to package managers, SuSE also has much better network updates and doesn't require a paid subscription like Red Hat.

      But for how long, I wonder.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Um, Redhat Network has a service level that doesn't cost anything: you get all the updates in exchange for doing a little marketing info every 6months.

      Plus, you get Redha ISOs for free.

      I can't digest the way Suse differentiates personal and professional versions for double the price when the significant differences are all Free software.

      Redhat screws up a times, but don't make up stuff.

    4. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for a professional desktop solution for a while.. I've toyed with Linux for years, but I've come to the point where I just want things to work. Thanks to numerous layoffs, the time to tweak is over, I need to boot up and chew bubble gum, and I'm all outta bubble gum.

      Right now all my desktops run RH8, it's nicely integrated and I don't have to worry about missing things from menus, the install was a breeze, everything looks OK. I think this is largely thanks to the Gnome 2 and KDE 3 work.

      So, once everything works good... it's time for some indulgence. Which distro takes it the step further for these little candies? Sounds like SuSE needs to be given a try.

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    5. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by StarTux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well no ISO's probably bring in some more money :).

      Seriously, I'd be very surprised if they followed RH's example, the mechanism just does not seem to be there for it as they routinely mirror the updates to other servers.

      Add in Red Carpet too I just don't see this happening at least for quite sometime.

      StarTux

    6. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a paid subscription to get redhat updates......

    7. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by garethwi · · Score: 1

      A while ago, I would have totally disagreed with you over that Mandrake comment, but over the last few versions, the quality is really going downhill with Mandrake. the latest version is the poorest of them all in my opinion.

    8. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by ssbljk · · Score: 1

      then you should read about differences at

      http://www.suse.com/us/private/products/suse_lin ux /i386/pers_prof.html

      --
      /ss
    9. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      When it comes to package managers, SuSE also has much better network updates and doesn't require a paid subscription like Red Hat. The paid subscription is major bummer indeed.

      Hmm, well I use SuSE 8 at home, but Red Hat at work, both by choice. When GNOME2 came out, I decided to give Red Hat 8 a try, and was very impressed. One of the things I liked about Red Hat was the RHN - the fact is that SuSEs online update thing hardly ever worked for me (and I know I'm not alone in that), and if there was a way to receive email notifications I never saw it.

      In general package management is one of the weakest parts of SuSE IMO.

    10. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it as long as SuSE has apt4rpm support it rocks

    11. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't live in complete ignorance (or weren't a troll, whichever applies to your general situation), you'd know that it's fully possible to use RedHat's up2date without a subscription. The only difference is that in times that there is significant load on the update servers, paid users have priority over free users.

      I won't even bother to argue the "desktop nullification" bit, since I -know- that's troll territory.

    12. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by twener · · Score: 1

      > In general package management is one of the weakest parts of SuSE IMO.

      Afaik with RedHat's package manager it's not possible to install third party rpms at all.

    13. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by twener · · Score: 1

      The best thing is the Professional update version for the price of the personal version. It's just missing additional manuals compared to the full price Professional version and can be installed without owning a previous SuSE version.

    14. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Who told you that? I install 3rd party RPMs all the time. In fact, there are far more available for Red Hat than SuSE, but as we're about to go in and shake up Linux packaging anyway, that hopefully won't be a reason to choose redhat for very long.

    15. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Surak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it comes to package managers, SuSE also has much better network updates and doesn't require a paid subscription like Red Hat. The paid subscription is major bummer indeed.

      I've had KDE 3.1, Desktop Sharing and Gnome 2.2 for quite a while now. The whole reason is my package manager, which doesn't require a paid subscription.

      My package manager: Gentoo's portage of course. :)

    16. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by twener · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should say GUI package manager? The thing where you select to install which given package selections. Not the rpm command line tool. Or do you use GNOME's or KDE's GUI package manager?

    17. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by orpheus2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be fair, RedHat does make freely available the actual update packages and are mirrored to all the other redhat mirrors.

      What you're really paying for (or if you're not paying for it and you're using one 'demo' account and floating a whole lot of systems between it) is the email notification, web based remote managment of the updating, and the automatic RPM depenedency resolution, which for a huge update (say after you install a machine) save a *lot* of time.

    18. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      I've had the same thing, slackware w/ KDE sources. ./configure && make , su, make install works for me.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    19. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by wik · · Score: 1

      Haven't used YaST2 recently, have you? It's an extremely easy package manager that handles all of the dependencies and works quite well.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    20. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      SuSE and Red Hat are the last professional distributions left in my opinion.

      I realize they're PPC-only, but I like Yellow Dog quite a bit as well. Speaking as a longtime BSD freak, YDL is the only Linux distro I'm comfortable using.

      --saint

    21. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but I'd much rather pay for the CD's ONCE than be forced to renew subscriptions.
      The SuSE model is more appealing to me.

    22. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by darnok · · Score: 1

      > I'm not very impressed with Mandrake overall. They
      > seem to be a bunch of amateurs.

      Well, technically you're correct - professionals by definition work for money, and it doesn't seem that Mandrake's going to be paying its' employees too much for a while...

      Seriously though, I'm interested to know why you think Mandrake is "a bunch of amateurs". While I haven't used SuSE, and probably won't because of their non-free ISO policy, I've done a lot of work with Mandrake and RedHat over the last several years.

      Over the last few releases, Mandrake has progressed in leaps and bounds compared to RedHat:
      - their hardware detection, which used to have trouble with lots of relatively common hardware, now seems to be significantly better than RedHat
      - urpmi is rock-solid, and (for me) performs better than up2date. And that's before you add in the (new) cost for RHN
      - IMHO, RedHat overreacted badly in pulling out all MP3 support from 8.0 at the last minute. At the time 8.0 was released, the MP3 patent holder (can't remember their name at the moment) had "made noises" about potentially charging for MP3 "stuff" at some point, but RH went over the top in deciding to simply pull all MP3-related tools from their distro at the last minute. It looked like a panic job (i.e. amateurish)
      - in my experience, Mandrake's out of the box installs have become more robust than RedHat's over the last few versions. My RedHat systems pretty much need to be updated straight away to avoid reliability issues; my Mandrake systems can survive on box-only versions of apps. Of course, this is largely influenced by the specific versions of gcc, cups, etc. involved, but the overall impression is of a more solid (=professional) product

      What specifically is it about Mandrake that you find amateurish, in comparison to either RedHat or SuSE?

    23. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      I'm not very impressed with Mandrake overall. They seem to be a bunch of amateurs.
      Opinionated troll-bait.
      When it comes to package managers, SuSE also has much better network updates and doesn't require a paid subscription like Red Hat. The paid subscription is major bummer indeed.
      The Mandrake Update tool works well AND is free...
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    24. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's all free software, and you could easily go out and compile all the stuff from code and integrate them together on your own. So why don't you, instead of waiting for SuSE or Redhat to do it for you? Oh, right, cause configuring all that crap by hand sucks balls.

      Tell me this too, why does Redhat differentiate between RH8.0 and RH Enterprise Linux? Plus they have six different price levels for the Enterprise Linux package.

      It's all Free software right? Right?

    25. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I primarily use RHN for the email notices.

      I don't have time to be checking every single package to see if it's up to date. RHN does that for me.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    26. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the complete lifetime of the 8.2 distribution which is 2 years! Free - no subscription, nothing necessary.

    27. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by T3kno · · Score: 1

      Amen brotha! I went from KDE 3.0.5 to KDE 3.1_rc1, rc2, etc, all the way up. emerge -u world is a wonderful thing too :)

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    28. Re:SuSE and Red Hat by Surak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I've noticed sometimes if there's a portage update, you've gotta emerge that *before* you emerge something else, and this sometimes breaks emerge -u world because whomever put the &*(&()& package didn't put the flag in there that says it requires portage version foo.bar. :(

      That happened to me once and it frustrated me to no end until I finally figured it out :)

  4. No!! Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    KDE 3.1 apparently includes tabbed browsing, the ability to sync with Exchange servers, a new administration tool called "Desktop sharing"..

    Oh, you mean just like every other distro that has kde 3.1?

    1. Re:No!! Really? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean just like every other distro that has kde 3.1?

      I was going to post a similar comment until I read yours. This is TOTALLY nothing new. KDE's been doing all this since late summer or so...
      (And that's the released betas and such. I'm sure it's been in CVS longer)

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    2. Re:No!! Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honest question: What other major distros have KDE 3.1?

    3. Re:No!! Really? by gladbach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      mmmmmmmmmmm. gentoo

      try it, you might like it.

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
    4. Re:No!! Really? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      All of them! That's why they call it Free Software! Sheesh...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    5. Re:No!! Really? by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Of course, by the time KDE 3.1 is compiled and installed on a gentoo system, 3.2 will have been released...

      If you only have one computer (like I do at the moment), Gentoo's just not workable. I tried it, but switched to Debian just so I could actually get work done.

      Maybe once I get another computer I'll throw it on there and let it compile for a couple days and see if it lives up to its claims...

    6. Re:No!! Really? by Vann_v2 · · Score: 1

      A couple of days? Unless you're compiling the whole KDE suite, it won't take over a few hours on a relatively recent machine (e.g., 1GHz or more, with 256 MB RAM or so).

    7. Re:No!! Really? by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, I run Gentoo on a lot of machines. I like it a lot.

      The package system in Gentoo is ridiculously easy to maintain. You'll never get left behind because your glibc is out dated and it's too hard to upgrade. You'll always have the newest stuff (if you want it) and everything is compiled to fit your system and your specifications exactly.

      Not everyone will like how Gentoo compiles everything from sources. I hope that somewhere down the road people start adapting the same package system to their binary-based distributions. It's really great!

      You also do have the option of creating your own binary packages, to use on other machines. This is good for stuff that takes a long time to compile (KDE, X, Gnome, etc) and it's good for installing Gentoo on slower machines.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    8. Re:No!! Really? by spectral · · Score: 1

      Happily running sorcerer. Took a while to get things compiled on Pentium 3 500MHz 128MB RAM, especially since the computer kept getting rebooted durign compiles, but a straight kde compile on THIS machine took only like 6 hours total I think.

      that's kdebase, artwork, network, games, toys, sdk, develop, edu, graphics, etc. etc. Basically everything you need for a really nice kde setup.

    9. Re:No!! Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really nice packaging system is based on portage (the source based package management in FreeBSD). FreeBSD also has binary packages available as well. Your "emerge whatever: is equivalent to FreeBSD's "make install" in usr/ports/whatever.

    10. Re:No!! Really? by X · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that KDE had anything for synching with Exchange. Is this really just the ability to synch with an IMAP server, or will I be able to synch KOrganizer with Exchange as well?

      --
      sigs are a waste of space
    11. Re:No!! Really? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      If you only have one computer (like I do at the moment), Gentoo's just not workable. I tried it, but switched to Debian just so I could actually get work done.


      Really? I installed Gentoo on my 233Mhz laptop. From Stage 1 (meaning: EVERYTHING is compiled. GCC, Glibc etc.). I installed Xfree and Fluxbox on it. I had no problems with the compiling.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    12. Re:No!! Really? by chadm1967 · · Score: 1

      Good point. I tried it, as well, and decided to go back to Debian. It just takes too long to get a working system up and running.

    13. Re:No!! Really? by MobyTurbo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      KDE 3.1 apparently includes tabbed browsing, the ability to sync with Exchange servers, a new administration tool called "Desktop sharing"..
      Oh, you mean just like every other distro that has kde 3.1?
      True, but SuSE is the main funder of KDE developers and has contributed the most to KDE; so in a sense these partially are SuSE accomplishments, that wouldn't have happened as quick if SuSE didn't support KDE as much as they have.
    14. Re:No!! Really? by twener · · Score: 1

      > but SuSE is the main funder of KDE developers and has contributed the most to KDE

      The most of the companies, don't forget freelance contributors!

    15. Re:No!! Really? by CoreDump01 · · Score: 1

      but a straight kde compile on THIS machine took only like 6 hours total I think.

      apt-get install kde: ~5 minutes on 600er Celeron.

    16. Re:No!! Really? by yanestra · · Score: 1
      Haa! Yesss! You might like it.

      But everyone who needs binary packages and a complete set of defined packages that definitely works - like people who have >100 servers - would be happier with some other distribution.

  5. Lets see.... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I could buy Suse 8.2 CD's or I could download Mandrake 9.1 CD's. I think I'll stick w/ the distro that lets me know what I"m getting ahead of time. (And just FYI, after I tried a bunch of distros and decided I wanted Mandrake I joined the Mandrake Club so I'm AM supporting those who support my computer.)

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:Lets see.... by batboy78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I totally agree, you could download the Suse Live Eval CD and do an FTP install (if you have the bandwidth) but I still like having the install CDs when I make a major foul-up and have to reinstall. And to anyone who is a Mandrake fan, you can always see the progress that the team is making on the newest releases. I think I have about 15 Mandrake 9.1 CDs laying around from the various incarnations that they went thru to get to the final release. I only wish Suse was as accomodating. But I agree that they have to make some revenue to pay their programmers.

    2. Re:Lets see.... by Eagle5596 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just download the boot ISO, and the file tree to a spare hard disk, then install over your own ftp link. I personally support SUSE's choice not release ISO's, it ensures the truly lazy will buy the distro and give them more money. I personally have used SUSE faithfully since 6.4, buying every major version to chip my wealth into the pot and help my favorite distro.

      At least the updates are free, unlike other major distros.

      Bottom line: It takes less time to just DL the tree and boot ISO than to DL a number of ISO's and burn them by hand. It's a good system, and a better distro than most.

    3. Re:Lets see.... by Centinel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Word is that Mandrake iso's starting with 9.1 will only be released for public downloading well after the retail boxes are shipped and they're made available to paying members of Mandrake Club

      Gas, ass or grass, nobody rides for free

    4. Re:Lets see.... by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I could buy Suse 8.2 CD's or I could download Mandrake 9.1 CD's. I think I'll stick w/ the distro that lets me know what I"m getting ahead of time.

      Not only that, but Mandrake 9.1 is 1.10976 times better than Suse 8.2!

    5. Re:Lets see.... by chill · · Score: 1

      Or revenue to pay for bandwith...

      5 CDs/2 DVDs is about 3.2 Gb of ISOs, assuming the second DVD doesn't contain extras not on the CDs. Actually, with DVDs being 4.7 Gb, there must be something else...

      Multiply that by every /.er who hits the mirrors -- they'd probably owe their souls to DT (or whoever supplies their bandwidth) by Monday.

      I can see why they don't do full .iso images...

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:Lets see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having the install CDs is nice for a while. But there comes a time when you don't need to reinstall the OS every few months. That's when the CDs become less of an issue. Also, it is best to download as few CDs as possible and use apt, urpmi, or whatever to install the remaining programs because it saves bandwidth. SuSE saves money by not offering complete ISO sets and, instead, pushing new users to buy a boxed set. The best feature Mandrake has is the simple free download option (i.e. no figuring out what ftp means), but I wouldn't be suprised if that is starting to cost them money (especially when many people run to download 2-3 ISO sets of each beta/alpha/pre release and choose the first mirror on the list).

    7. Re:Lets see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they could always offer the iso to other servers if it was just a question of bandwidth

    8. Re:Lets see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just aint too sharp,are you? Mandrakeclub is a joke,and a ripoff.

    9. Re:Lets see.... by littleRedFriend · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. Not if you have no choice but using a USB ADSL modem, unless you want to patch & recompile the kernel, go through 20 outdated mini-howto's.

      I tried it, lost a lot of time and this only resulted in my having personal vendetta with the Suse marketeers, who package and document the ftp distribution.

      Other option. The old non-free software way: anyone interested in mirroring some ISOs for Suse 8.2? P2P maybe?

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    10. Re:Lets see.... by DrJonesAC2 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree.
      I made the mistake of buying SuSE 8.1 Professional Edition. What a waste of money that was. The DVD Rom didn't work at all, and as foar as I can tell the extra 3 CD's you get are useless unless you know what is on them. I will be a long time Mandrake user I'm sure. It worked right out of the box (or download if you want to get technical). As soon as Mandrake 9.1 is out I will be buying a copy to help support it and joining the Mandrake Club.

    11. Re:Lets see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also get an FTP-install boot disk and run Suse 8.2 for free, but hey..why mention your options when you can just troll Slashdot instead?

    12. Re:Lets see.... by javilon · · Score: 1

      As a Mandrake user and Mandrake club member I can tell you that I don't value the ISOs as much as having a say at what the distribution is. It feels a bit like using debian (the users drive the development) except the stuff is up to date.

      --


      When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    13. Re:Lets see.... by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1
      There is a major flaw in that line of thought though.

      I DL the iso file from where I get up to 1Mb/sec speed. So, I have all I need in just over an hour.

      If I were to do as you say from home, it would take almost 2 WEEKS to get SuSe. Since I can only get a 28.8K MAX connection, and it dies a lot.

      Not everyone has broadband out the wazzo at home.

      sure, I can go buy the CDs.. but I am cheap and I also want it now.

    14. Re:Lets see.... by twener · · Score: 1

      What prevents you to "wget -r ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/8.1/suse" and burn it to CD-ROMs?

    15. Re:Lets see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which, if the release for 9.0 is any indication... should be about TWO MONTHS from when it's done. It took them forever to get 9.0 boxes to ship.

    16. Re:Lets see.... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1
      I bought Suse 7.3 back when I was trying distros because I couldn't get ISO's of it to use. To it's credit it installed, but the sound didn't work and overall I didn't like it as much as mandrake. Except I'd just spent 40 dollars for something I didn't like and didn't want.

      Now I've heard that Suse 8 is excellent. I'm not trying to insult their level of software. But many times when I'm trying a new distrobution I reinstall multiple times before I decided I've got it done the way I want. I don't have an extra hard drive to mirror the ftp site on, (which is reasonably sad since I have a little over half a terabyte between my computers), I want a copy of the OS on site so that I know should things go bad, I have it here to install from. Also, even though I hear it's great, my live eval of suse 8.1 doesn't boot on any computer I've tried it on. Knoppix works excellent for providing a recovery environment, but Suse doesn't work, so you can see why I'd be understandably causious about doing a network type install or buying it.

      Also, (I believe), Suse is still a part of United Linux which I do not want to support.

      --
      I do security
    17. Re:Lets see.... by Novus · · Score: 1

      On some machines, the DVD installer doesn't work properly. This is a really silly bug, and I'm surprised SuSE didn't spot it before release. You can still install the base system from the CDs and change the installation source afterwards to the DVD, though.

      The extra CDs in the professional version mostly contain stuff that is not interesting to normal desktop users and is not in the default installation. Naturally, the default installation is on the first few CDs to minimise disk swapping in the common case.

      If you want something from the extra CDs, all you have to do is choose to add it to the installation; in other words, you simply tell YAST that you want to select individual packages. After that, it's simply a matter of checking the right boxes. If you don't know exactly which programs you need, YAST has extensive descriptions. In short, the extra software is quite easily accessible even for the moderately advanced user.

    18. Re:Lets see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I have about 15 Mandrake 9.1 CDs laying around from the various incarnations that they went thru to get to the final release.

      They make these things called rewritable disks.

    19. Re:Lets see.... by StarTux · · Score: 1

      Lets see....

      Mandrake in Chapter 11 (well French version), SuSE not.

      SuSE may not have ISO's, one reason is some apps cannot be put on CD....

      Mandrake setup a Members Club and has begged -Twice- for monetry assistance, SuSE don't offer ISO downloads, but do offer FTP installs...Which one is the better?

      StarTux

    20. Re:Lets see.... by Daemonik · · Score: 1
      Also, (I believe), Suse is still a part of United Linux which I do not want to support.
      Just because SCO has turned into a bunch of wankers doesn't mean you should punish SuSE or Conectiva by association. The reason they formed UL was to share a common code base (mostly SuSE's, btw) with each distributer adding their own bells and whistles. UL is still a good idea.

      As far as the SuSELiveCD's, I've never had any trouble with them. Perhaps you had an error during the download of the ISO the caused your CD to get burnt wonky.

      As for SuSE 8.1, it's been excellent and I use it daily at home and work. I'll be snatching a copy of 8.2 as soon as it's released.

    21. Re:Lets see.... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Would you be able to give a comparison of the differences between Mandrake 9.1 and Suse 8.2 (as well as is possible when neither is released). I have no intention of blacklisting Suse in any way, but once bitten (buying 7.2 and no go w/ liveEval 8.1) twice shy to jump through hoops to use it.

      --
      I do security
    22. Re:Lets see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I borrowed a copy of 7.1 (way back when)since I was trying all the distros to see what fit. Mandrake was nice and I bought a copy but the SuSE was the first to recognize everything out of the box without wasting hours dorking around. I went out and bought a copy of SuSE to support them a bit. I will probably buy the "upgrade" version of pro for $49 or whatever it is now. It is about time to kick in a little more.

  6. GCC 3.3 ? by Alex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the website,

    "SuSE Linux 8.2 also includes a pre-release of gcc 3.3"

    Interesting choice - apparently GCC 3.3 includes a lot of work SuSE have contributed. Will this be as controversal as Redhat's compiler choice of 2.96 a while back?

    Alex

    1. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by josh+crawley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on! Redhat's GCC 2.96 compiler wasnt unstable atKERNEL PANIC.

    2. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I think by prerelease they mean *optional* prerelease. You don't need to use it if you don't want, I'm sure the older verison will be available.

      From what I remember, they do this with a few other programs/libs.

    3. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by justins · · Score: 1
      Interesting choice - apparently GCC 3.3 includes a lot of work SuSE have contributed. Will this be as controversal as Redhat's compiler choice of 2.96 a while back?

      Only if they build the whole system with it, as opposed to simply including it along with the other compilers.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    4. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Kourino · · Score: 5, Informative

      Interesting choice - apparently GCC 3.3 includes a lot of work SuSE have contributed. Will this be as controversial as Redhat's compiler choice of 2.96 a while back?

      Probably not. GCC 3.3 will be an actual official FSF release. By the time 12 April comes around I doubt SuSE's gcc lags behind the official FSF release much. Remember, 2.96 and 2.97 were basically continuations of the 2.9x branch, after the FSF had basically stopped working on it and started working on GCC 3.x.

      Thing is, gcc 3.x broke things. Also, Red Hat had a collection of IA-64 improvements for gcc that may not have made it into mainline yet. So, they made the unofficial releases because they felt that's what served their customers best. 2.96 was, I understand, the best gcc for IA-64 for a while. It just happened to have problems in other areas, unfortunately ...

    5. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      By the time 12 April comes around I doubt SuSE's gcc lags behind the official FSF release much.

      But it will probably lag behind the official release SOME? And be only SLIGHTLY incompatible?

      And this is acceptable HOW?

      Distros that ship major components like gcc or glibc from pre-releases before they're ready should be taken out and shot.

    6. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      How do you get a kernel panic that writes "KERNEL PANIC" in your browser and presses "Submit"? That's a pretty cool kernel panic... *g*

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    7. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mean if you're going to try to fool us all, at least try to make it believaKERNEL PANIC

    8. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      It wont be incompatible. Gcc 3.3 is 100% compatible with gcc 3.2, so are the gcc 3.3 beta's.

      I am writing this from KDE 3.2 compiled with gcc 3.3 linked with a Qt 3.1.1 compiled with gcc 3.2

      Btw. stop trolling or stop posting about issues you dont understand..

    9. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by twener · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, KDE 3.2 is still months away.

    10. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. You do not seem to realise that
      Red Hat "has done it again" in their latest
      distro. The glibc they include is a prerelease
      version, with some additional symbols to what
      everyone else uses. This means that you can
      run the programs of most other distros on
      Red Hat, but doing the opposite with packages
      built for Red Hat will fail for quite a few of
      the bigger packages (e.g. OpenOffice). What do
      I think about this ? Judge for yourself.

    11. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gcc3.3 will rock - the new pipeline description thing beats the hell out of 3.2 in terms of speed optimization.

    12. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      If he's using GCC 3.3 (which is in CVS) he's probably using KDE CVS-HEAD, which is working on the 3.2 release at the moment.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by aled · · Score: 1

      Er... Red Hat 8.0 uses gcc 3.2, what are you talking about?

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    14. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      gcc-3_3-branch in gcc CVS aka gcc 3.3

      HEAD in KDE CVS aka KDE 3.2

    15. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many percent do you think of HEAD is NOW identical to KDE 3.2?

    16. Re:GCC 3.3 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not trolling. If it wasn't released yet, one might think there's a reason, right? If not, why isn't it released?

      Think if gcc-3.3 isn't out yet, but the internal library versions have been updated, that when people compile things on SuSE and then find that don't run on other systems that that might be a problem?

      I understand this issue a lot better than you do, apparently, because I've been bit by it many times before.

  7. GCC by cos(0) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GCC 3.3 is not released yet; are they hoping that it'll be out before their deadline, will they include an unstable 3.3, or is this a typo in the announcement?

    1. Re:GCC by zurab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GCC 3.3 is not released yet; are they hoping that it'll be out before their deadline, will they include an unstable 3.3, or is this a typo in the announcement?

      In that case, most likely they will include the stable GCC as well as the pre-release, as they have always done, and provide choices to users. SuSE offers a lot more choices and flexibility in their setup than people give them credit for. Consider the selection between 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels before 2.4 matured and caught on. And, while they do support KDE as their main desktop environment, they have by no means abandoned GNOME either.

    2. Re:GCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I hope SuSE 8.2 contains SOME SORT OF GCC by default. I was severely pissed when I installed "SuSE Linux Office Desktop" (after waiting several weeks for it to arrive, even though I placed my order via the Internet the day it was announced, and stipulated Federal Express delivery), and discovered that I couldn't even build 'xosview'. The 'configure' script barfed because it couldn't find a compiler, nor any of the tools - no 'make', no nothing. That is a total crock... Worst yet, there was no compiled RPM to grab, either.

      Yes, I could potentially search out and find each and every .src.rpm file out there, drag them down over my 28.8k dial-up line and bravely attempt to build them and install them. I've been hacking Unix long before SLS ever appeared. Point is, WHY SHOULD I? I shelled out $129 including shipping, and I would think that something as mundane as a C compiler and its associated tools would've been right there. What assurance do I have that whatever I build will actually work? I don't know what other paradigms SuSE has chosen to break.

      Furthermore, I had to build the SLOD on a fresh disk - there were no understandable/supported procedures for upgrading an existing SuSE Linux installation (either SuSE 7.3 or SuSE 8.0, both of which I have, on two separate systems). The installation code SEES the other Linux system and can even boot it for me, but there are apparently no methods or tools for the installation code to analyze the current installation and upgrade it.

      Sorry, but I am VERY disappointed - it's holding up my V2.5 kernel regression testing.

      Yes, I know there are issues with GCC V3.mumble with respect to the V2.5 kernels. If SuSE was as good as they like to think they are, they could have:

      1.) Made it easy to install the GCC compiler suite (compiler, 'make', etc., etc.) for V2.96 in one directory, permitting the installer to choose it as the default or not,

      2.) Made it easy to also install the V3.mumble GCC suite as either the default (if the V2.96 wasn't installed as default), or to a different directory so that it could be called by a different command.
      (I.e., `which gcc3` would return "/usr/bin/gcc-v3.2" and `which gcc` would return "/usr/bin/gcc" or vice-versa).

      3.) Make it possible to update the KDE bits without having to rip out everything. A script would be nice that would check the current installation, determine which RPMs needed to be updated, and then perform the update automatically. Last time I tried to update KDE, I found I needed to rip out virtually everything, including some -devel RPMs that should have been optional and NOT required dependencies of the main RPMs, and then re-install virtually from scratch. The current RPM dependency tree for KDE on SuSE is a jungle of spiderwebs.

      SuSE - I hope you get it right in 8.2 !! I bought SLOD because it was, supposedly SuSE 8.1 with the various office applications on it. Instead, it appears to be a thin layer of SuSE 8.1 mortar trying to serve some applications, not a full distribution that I thought I paid for (and, no, I was not paying for a full Enterprise Server edition, nor did I expect to get it). I'm willing to pay for the SuSE 8.2 product, but if it isn't done right, I won't be back in the future. You can bank on it.

    3. Re:GCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You then better use SuSE 8.2 Professional, because the Personal Edition doesn't include development headers (and perhaps even a compiler) afaik.

    4. Re:GCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh* - yeah, and that was my confusion (I'm the AC who wrote the piece you just replied to). I've been buying the SuSE Professional kits (at USD$80+ shipping) for quite some time. It simply didn't occur to me that the new SLOD was a re-badged Personal Edition, since I was used to getting everything in the Pro. Well, I guess I can at least take solace in that I've incrementally helped SuSE stay alive for a little while longer.

      So, live and learn... I guess I'll be buying the 8.2 Pro very soon. I just wish the KDE stuff would upgrade easier...

      Thank you for waking me up. Time to ditch the semi-decaf for some real coffee here!!

  8. Last night.... by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was reported last night on OSNews. What's with the 24 hour delay, editors?
    Anyone know if 8.2 will support ACPI?

    1. Re:Last night.... by larien · · Score: 1

      Subscriber probably had earlier access and us scum have had to wait :)

    2. Re:Last night.... by minus23 · · Score: 1

      Yea a couple other stories I thought were a bit behind aswell. I always had Slashdot as my home-page because it was fast loading and I would stumble upon some stuff everynow and then that I hadn't read anywhere else. I still find stuff that I haven't read anywhere else... but I'm finding a couple that were from quite a while ago. It really sorta waters down the experience a bit when you see a story you had read somewhere else a full day or so earlier. I only see this as a problem that can get worse as they are going forward with more and more "subscriber" stories.

    3. Re:Last night.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using SuSE 8.1 which supports ACPI....
      That should answer your question.

    4. Re:Last night.... by robt.l · · Score: 1

      8.1 did.You could disable it on install though.

  9. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got back from buying SuSE 8.1 today :( Is there going to be anyway to upgrade from 8.1 -> 8.2? Or must I buy it also?

  10. If i'm not mistaken... by Soko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...the "Desktop Sharing" feature is part of KDE 3.1, so any one who upgrades to that version gets that particular functionality - not just those on SuSE 8.2.

    *Looks at the KDE 3.1 menu on his RedHat 8.0 machine*

    K-->System Tools-->More System Tools -->DesktopSharing

    Yup, I'm not mistaken. (APT4RPM and KDE For Redhat are great together, BTW.)

    SuSE is a great distro, but credit where credit is due, please.

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    1. Re:If i'm not mistaken... by cultobill · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the writeup:
      Amongst other nifty features, KDE 3.1 apparently includes tabbed browsing, the ability to sync with Exchange servers, a new administration tool called "Desktop sharing" that allows remote control of other desktops,

      From the parent:
      If i'm not mistaken... the "Desktop Sharing" feature is part of KDE 3.1, so any one who upgrades to that version gets that particular functionality - not just those on SuSE 8.2.
      SuSE is a great distro, but credit where credit is due, please.

      I've heard of not reading the article, but not reading the /. writeup? Come on!

      As an aside, I swear I'm going to install KDE 3.1 one of these days when I have time, it looks nice (shiny!)

      --
      -- Bill "Houdini" Weiss
    2. Re:If i'm not mistaken... by Arandir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've heard of not reading the article, but not reading the /. writeup? Come on!

      It apparently has nothing to do with not reading the writeup. It apparently has everything to do with Slashdot lameness. Let me translate the writeup do you can understand how apparently lame it really is:

      "Among other nifty features, Gnome 2.2 apparently includes a file manager, the ability to grab mail from IMAP servers, a new administration tool that let's you change your desktop wallpaper."

      Okay, maybe not as bad as that, but you get the point. The writeup wasn't about a future release of SuSE, it was about a several month old release of KDE.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:If i'm not mistaken... by twener · · Score: 1

      Better wait some more days for KDE 3.1.1 being around the corner.

    4. Re:If i'm not mistaken... by robt.l · · Score: 1

      It's just that RH breaks KDE without telling anyone before their release. Maybe people like the fact that SuSE works side by side with developers and not in a secretive and propritary (M$) manner.

    5. Re:If i'm not mistaken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      credit where credit is due? you mean redhat?

      f that man - i'll give credit to kde, not to redhat.

  11. Re: by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

    This is the main reason I HATE paying for software. When I load it up I'm already getting messages to buy the upgrade!

  12. MainActor by batboy78 · · Score: 1

    "In addition to CD/DVD writing applications, sound mixing, editing, and an integrated synthesizer, SuSE Linux 8.2 is the first distribution to include MainActor, a professional video editing application, enabling customers to compose and edit digital movies. The KDE scanning application Kooka and the commercial OCR tool Kadmos enable users to scan both printed and hand-written texts into the word processing application."

    Is MainActor a commercial Linux video editing application or is this a Suse created application?

    1. Re:MainActor by cultobill · · Score: 1

      Call me the google Bot...

      www.google.com -> "MainActor"
      The first 2 links are in German, the third is MainActor delivers, needs a better cast" from Linuxworld.com.au

      --
      -- Bill "Houdini" Weiss
    2. Re:MainActor by zurab · · Score: 1

      Is MainActor a commercial Linux video editing application or is this a Suse created application?

      It's here. It's a commercial video editing app. It's pretty cool when you know what the hell it is you are doing. As far as I was able to use it was editing frames in movies, but hey, I don't want to give out too many ideas to the goatse.cx guy.

    3. Re:MainActor by Herkules · · Score: 0

      Hey google bot could you find me some Java tutors! ;}

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    4. Re:MainActor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.bruceeckel.com, Thinking in Java, 3rd edition. Freely downloadable.

    5. Re:MainActor by Herkules · · Score: 0

      Thanks =)

      I am sorry to say it was just a bad joke! =/

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
  13. Re:SuSE is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    ...a German Company! Buying their stuff means supporting terrorism!

    Fuck you you jingoist neo-conservative flag-waving useful idiot for the Zionists.

    It's dumbasses that you who give meaning to the word "ugly American."

    Maybe if you didn't fill your ears with tripe from Michael Savage (who's real name is Weiner BTW) you wouldn't have shit-for-brains shoveled into your gourd by the mainstream media.

    America First! No war for Israel!

  14. Re:SuSE is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna go buy a copy of SuSE 8.2 just to piss you off and pick up a wedge of French camembert on the way home to rub it in

  15. is this United? by mdew · · Score: 1, Insightful

    so this is United-Linux based?

    --
    http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/
    1. Re:is this United? by Dunkalis · · Score: 4, Informative

      UnitedLinux is only in SuSE's highend server offerings. UnitedLinux is based on SuSE Enterprise Server. I don't think that many other Linux vendors other than Red Hat have the influence, money, and talent that SuSE does, and their distro is pretty nice. The availability of SuSE packages, however, is pretty limited. I gave up with it because I couldn't find any packages for anything I wanted, and I couldn't find any SuSE docs that described how to make an RPM, and I like my packages to fit in with standards of the distro. RPMFind was pretty useless for finding SuSE packages...

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
    2. Re:is this United? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuSE is still closely associated with SCO. Fuck them and the horse they rode in on. Use a distro that isn't trying to kill Linux.

    3. Re:is this United? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rpm will install any RedHat rpm you may find.
      thats why its included with SuSE.

      nobody bothers building SuSE rpms cuz you can just use the RH ones :)

    4. Re:is this United? by firebeyer · · Score: 1

      suse will just run your rpms dude it just installs them u dont need to do anything with it at all man.

    5. Re:is this United? by ADRA · · Score: 1

      I would say Redhat enterprise slightly edges out suse enterprise. Just by looking at the certified releases from 3rd party software companies like Oracle, BEA, etc.. they seem to have Linux support initially targetsed at AS 2.1, then Suse, or if they are really didicated, some of the 'free' releases.

      PS: Redhat AS 2.1 source packages are avail for download, so they aren't totally breaking the spirit of the GPL, but try to find binaries...

      --
      Bye!
    6. Re:is this United? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I like my packages to fit in with standards of the distro

      That about says it all. The other RPMs will work, but may install files in different places, may not register with the package managers, not update startup scripts in a uniform way, etc. But these slight differences really do not change the usability of the system. And, if you're that worried about breaking something, simply never install any RPM from any source but the install CD.

    7. Re:is this United? by Dunkalis · · Score: 1

      Actually, I had many problems with Red Hat/Mandrake RPMs. They are named differently, and that can make a big difference. If you have GTK installed via a SuSE RPM (say gtk-lib-2.2.i386.rpm) and then you install the Red Hat GNOME 2.2 RPMs, Red Hat may package their GNOME RPMs to require the package gtk-2.2, while SuSE provides gtk-lib-2.2. Its a pretty nasty system. Note that this is probably not the exact way the packages are identified, but small inconsistencies like this are what cause problems.

      I no longer use SuSE, so its not a problem for me.

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
  16. SuSE... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I feel compelled to post this, because I'm sure in a few hours there will be tons of RedHat fanboys slagging SuSE and going on about how RedHat is the greatest.

    I use RedHat pretty extensively at work (Advanced Server and 8.0) and I am not at all impressed with it. I'm not sure what it is, but it doesn't feel as complete as SuSE. And RH folks, why did you cripple KDE so I can't shut the machine down from KDE? Even your sales reps were amazed when I showed them my SuSE box with it's shutdown screen. What was your reasoning for this?

    SuSE seems stable as all hell, and it's hardware detection is second to none. I'm suprised nobody else has something like suse's little hwscan program (or do they). I just pop in a USB device (like a cdrw or a floppy drive) and it's configured, and appears on my KDE desktop. It's automagical.

    SuSE plays mp3s out of the box.

    It seems like the playing field these days is being narrowed down to RedHat and SuSE. Here's hoping it doesn't get narrowed down any further.

    1. Re:SuSE... by Blimey85 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      the playing field these days is being narrowed down to RedHat and SuSE

      You left Mandrake off of this list because of what? Maybe your lack of experience with Mandrake products... or maybe your simply biased. I use RedHat for my servers and Mandrake for my desktop units. Each has it's strengths and weaknesses. Mandrake is slowly becoming better and better for servers and RedHat has never been very good for desktops, and is continually making things worse... at least if your a KDE fan/user (I use KDE exclusively).

      SuSE plays mp3s out of the box.

      What distro doesn't play mp3's out of the box? Oh wait, I know this one... RedHat... right. Forgot about them not bothering to ship the proper software for mp3 decoding in 8.0. At least that is what I read was the problem. I haven't tried playing mp3's with RH 8.0 so I can't say for sure. See, I've been too busy enjoying my Mandrake desktop with KDE 3.1 and the new version of Mozilla (which freakin rocks btw)

      Anyway, my point is that before you make a statement about the playing field being narrowed down to only 2 of the many distros, why don't you do some research and see just how many users the other distros have. I would wager that Mandrake has a considerable user base. Everyone I know uses it for desktops (and almost everyone I know uses RH for servers... with a few FreeBSD installs for good measure).

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    2. Re:SuSE... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1


      Actually I wasn't trying to belittle Mandrake at all. I really do hope they pull thru their current troubles. And I should have qualified my statement...

      But it does seem as if Mandrake is in trouble. And if they don't pull out of it, the choices will be down to 2 major players.

      That any better?

      PS - I did try mandrake once, back in the day. It crashed on install, and I never went there again. But I'm sure it's better now.

    3. Re:SuSE... by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      My friend, you have hooked my attention on the automagicality of SuSE, I require only screenshots to titilate my senses!

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    4. Re:SuSE... by arcade · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You left Mandrake off of this list because of what?

      Not that I want to start a distro war, but my personal experience with Mandrake is that it has decayed since mdk8.1 . The 8.2 release was b0rken in so many ways that it wasn't even funny (for me). When I tried participating in betatesting of 9.0 (I think), i reported lots of bugs. None of which even got a single reply. None of which was fixed. (hangups, not able to mount fat12/16 properly, and others (At least I couldn't get them to work :)).

      I've never had such problems with SuSE, which seems well tested when released. Personally I used mdk on all desktops from 7.0 to 8.1, used 8.2 on a couple of machines, both which broke so horribly that I've never been able to trust the distro since. I've tried 9.0, but wasn't overly impressed. SuSE on the other hand has worked flawlessly, and is my new favorite.

      RedHat is, imho, only good for some server tasks where it is/was the only certified distro. But that is just my opinion.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    5. Re:SuSE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my system I've gone out of my way to limit stuff like that. I don't *want* people rebooting willy-nilly.
      Only root can reboot.
      ctrl-alt-del is disabled.

      And KDE certainly doesn't have ability either.

    6. Re:SuSE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's true, RH does not play mp3 files out of the box. They are worried about licensing/patent issues; they provide a target with money for those who hold the patent on the mp3 format to go after.

      Dunno why SuSE and Mandrake aren't worried about that, maybe RH is just more cautious.

      Like it, hate it, whatever, at least understand it.

    7. Re:SuSE... by GammaTau · · Score: 2, Informative

      SuSE seems stable as all hell, and it's hardware detection is second to none. I'm suprised nobody else has something like suse's little hwscan program (or do they). I just pop in a USB device (like a cdrw or a floppy drive) and it's configured, and appears on my KDE desktop. It's automagical.

      As far as I understand, many tools SuSE has developed for their own distribution are not available under GPL or some other free software license. The tools Mandrake and Red Hat develop can usually be used in other distributions while SuSE tools, especially YaST, can't be.

    8. Re:SuSE... by schrottie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm afraid you're right about SuSE being more preofessional, BUT my personal little "annoy me again in the next release, my little bug"-list just keeps getting longer and longer. I really can't see the point in adding more and more features when the bugs just don't... wait! This is nothing new at all- sorry.

    9. Re:SuSE... by Organic_Info · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To a point I'm OK with the distrobutions providing non GPL management tools.

      Each distro requires something to differentiate it form the others. If I was CompanyA and I spend a lot of time/money developing a tools that is then ripped for nothing by CompanyB on release which Company will survive longer?

      Its still OSS but sometimes you need some protection for your work - I don't see a problem with this.

      .

      --
      "Things that you own end up owning you" - Tyler Durden (via Diogenes of Sinope).
    10. Re:SuSE... by kuiken · · Score: 1

      Not only does it play mp3's out of the box, by default it rips .ogg files :)
      and yes plays em

      --

      42
    11. Re:SuSE... by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
      (hangups, not able to mount fat12/16 properly, and others (At least I couldn't get them to work :)).

      Okay ... I'm really lost here, what the hell is a fat12 drive? If you meant 32/16 then there was absolutely no trouble on any boxen I tested to read Fat32 or NTFS partitions. Not saying that you didn't have trouble, just I know that I was able to read it with 9.0 rc's.

      As far as server tasks go. There is absolutely NO REASON to use any RPM-Based distro (more specifically SuSE, RH, or MDK). If you want a server you should use Debian or Slackware. These are perfect server distros because they follow the KISS philosophy. If you can show me how to do a base (kernel with very basic tools *ONLY*) install of any of those distros I would like to see it.

      Yes I know RH has a non-X install, and I know there are ways to remove unwanted packages from MDK and SuSE, but can you take 15 megs of free space and install an entire functional distro to build components of the server that will be neccessary without all the other non-essential and sometimes harmful packages??

      RH without bastille is about as safe as the pull out method in my book. All three of them come with far too much bloat for a server, hence why I also prefer *BSD for servers.

      Keep It Simple Stupid ... best philosophy for a server, period.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    12. Re:SuSE... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      yea, you are lost.

      when you format a floppy in DOS...fat12

      now, i dont think its *ahem* widely used for most HD filesystems

      but it does exist.

    13. Re:SuSE... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      That's surely the most sucky thing about Mandrake - inability to report bugs. Even once you've managed to find the bug tracker at http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/, (it doesn't seem to be publicized much), you can't enter any bugs against the current Mandrake release. If you do report a bug in the current version you get told that the Bugzilla is for Cooker only.

      Red Hat aren't always that responsive with their Bugzilla reports, but at least they provide some way to report bugs. Mandrake give the impression of not caring whether their current release is buggy or not. (And no, online forums are not an adequate substitute for a bug tracker.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    14. Re:SuSE... by PerryMason · · Score: 1

      If you can show me how to do a base (kernel with very basic tools *ONLY*) install of any of those distros I would like to see it.

      Its actually pretty damn easy with RedHat at least. All you need to do is to edit the flat text comps file (xml in RH8) to no longer include the things you don't want installed in the 'Base' section, run genhdlist and you're away. Make up a quickstart floppy for network installs or burn up a new CD for CD installs.

      I personally use an ftp/apt-rpm server to do all my installs from kickstart floppies. 10-15 minutes from a blank system to a fully patched up system, containing _only_ the packages I want and nothing I dont, plus apt allows me to add in my own custom rpms of things that RH is reluctant or slow to release. I have different floppy images setup to build base systems for different purposes. Apt then means all I need is to throw a cron job in place to keep them patched up every day.

      People seem to be so quick to dis a distro without actually trying it out properly or learning what it offers. Kickstart installs give you control over pretty much everything you could want in an installer.

      --
      "I'm tired of all this 'Aren't humanity great' bullshit. We're a virus with shoes" - Bill Hicks
    15. Re:SuSE... by deKernel · · Score: 1

      Use Debian or Slackware for a server you say..

      Me: Hi Mr/Ms Oracle Sales Rep, I am running a quad Xeon machine, and I want to use a real good database, what do you have to offer...
      Rep: LAUGH OUT LOUD
      Me: Why are you laughing, that is not very nice.
      Rep: Click
      Me: Hello?

    16. Re:SuSE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing. Did it about three weeks ago in fact.

      Ingredients:

      - 1 Slackware box (8.1, plus patches)
      - 1 DB2 package from IBM's web site
      - A healthy helping of clues

      Even though the thing comes as a bunch of RPMs, it still works fine on that system. You just have to know how to handle foreign package formats. Big deal.

      I'm sure the technique works about the same on Debian. All of this assumes you can actually handle something a little more complicated than pointing and clicking.

    17. Re:SuSE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to run Oracle on Linux:
      http://jordan.fortwayne.com/oracle
      Yes it's a HOWTO based on RH -
      but Oracle can run on Slackware,
      and yes I've done it using Slackware 8.0 :-P

    18. Re:SuSE... by Novus · · Score: 1

      SuSE, on the other hand, is absolutely paranoid about DivX. Every single program in the distribution that could play DivX has the decoder chopped out and the source code is missing from the discs; you're stuck with binary-only copies of e.g. MPlayer.

    19. Re:SuSE... by Blimey85 · · Score: 1
      Ok you bastards... you have squashed my love for Mandrake. I've had problems since 8.0. With 8.0 I couldn't get my mount points to work correctly. Accessing my cd drives and Winblows partitions was a nightmare. 8.1 fixed most of that. I was moving and doing other stuff for most of 8.2's life so I never tried that. Came back when one of the 9.0 betas came out. Now running the latest 9.1 and it locks up 3 to 4 times per day.

      So now I'm going to try Suse. I've never used it before but all I keep hearing is how great it is and so I've got to see for myself. It has to be more stable than my current setup, and it looks like they release packages as soon as they can, which Mandrake has never done. For example, KDE has Suse packages for 3.1 for several differnt versions of Suse. None listed for Mandrake at all. For those of us that don't have much luck installing from source in Mandrake, that really blows.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    20. Re:SuSE... by Erwos · · Score: 1

      "Requires"? RedHat has been doing quite well in the USA without _requiring) proprietary packages to prevent CD sharing. The _only_ one I can think of is the "RedHat trademark artwork" (NOT Bluecurve!) RPM, which can be replaced pretty easily by someone who knows what they're doing. Mandrake hit bankruptcy using such proprietary packaging technique - apparently doing it doesn't work as well as you thought.

      "Sure, it's OSS, but sometimes you still need some protection for your work." OSS licenses are supposed to be providing the protection, not you stealing people's hard work and then not even handing it back to them for free.

      RedHat might or might not be the best distro, but I do appreciate that they are not taking wholesale from the community and then having the audacity to force people to buy it back. Yes, you can't just grab their AW/AS/ES ISOs and install them off the web - but you can grab the sources off the net and do it without too much hassle. This is appropriate protection, IMHO.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    21. Re:SuSE... by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
      After taking all that trouble to hack your own install of RedHat and then an install of Apt-RPM ... haven't you taken all the steps you could have easily avoided by using Debian?

      If it's the hardware detection that you want, use knoppix to install debian, hardware detection is done with redhat's hardware detector.

      I'm not trying to dis a distro, I know for a fact that anyone seasoned enough with linux can get ANYTHING from one distro to work in another. I'm just saying that RH wasn't designed to do what you're doing, but of course it is possible. It's also possible to default install SuSE and MDK and manually remove all the uneccessary packages. But like I said above, if you want a base install and you want customization and you want apt ... possibly debian is a better solution for you?

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    22. Re:SuSE... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I would wager that Mandrake has a considerable user base. Everyone I know uses it for desktops (and almost everyone I know uses RH for servers... with a few FreeBSD installs for good measure).

      FWIW, everyone I know uses SuSE for desktops and servers.

      Further, people around here generally start out with either SuSE or Mandrake. The ones that start with SuSE switch to Linux as their primary or even exclusive OS within 2 years, whereas the ones who start with Mandrake give up within a month and join the "Linux isn't ready for Prime Time" club. In the 3 years I've been using Linux I haven't yet seen an exception to this rule.

      I'm not trying to belittle Mandrake, just providing a counter to your annecdote.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    23. Re:SuSE... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
      If you can show me how to do a base (kernel with very basic tools *ONLY*) install of any of those distros I would like to see it.

      Boot the installer CD, type `rescue' and run that?

      Selecting a minimal Mandrake system (circa 30MB) has been easy for a very long time. Choose individual packages, click on the recycle-looking icon, disable anything you don't like. Look in /root/drakx for a floppy image which will re-run that install for the next machine (you can write that into a CD's boot area if you don't want to boot from floppy).

      --
      Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  17. Re:SuSE is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna go buy a copy of SuSE 8.2 just to piss you off and pick up a wedge of French camembert on the way home to rub it in

    Good idea. Why not pick up a sarcasm detector, too?

  18. it's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    we can still use SuSe and be patriots, i hear they're renaming it "freedom linux" and all of the development team are going to come to the US and join the army so that they can die for our SUVs.

    1. Re:it's ok by drdanny_orig · · Score: 0, Funny

      Everything is ok.
      Your money is safe.
      The world is simple.
      You are with us or against us.
      Go buy yourself something, you deserve it.
      Those in charge know what they are doing and will take care of you.
      -- Republican Lullaby, stolen from somebody somewhere.

      --
      .nosig
    2. Re:it's ok by Rooktoven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personally, I don't think the above 2 are trolls. They are responding to a stupid idea.

      Now I'm going to go out and buy some FRENCH fries and FRENCH kiss my girlfriend, and then laugh at the morons who are going to boycott things in the name of GWB's manhood.

      (Even more OT: The origin of the word "France" is "Frank", which originally meant "a free man", so France meant "home of free men". Almost kinda sorta maybe justifies those idiots eating "freedom toast"...)

      --

      Acquiescence leads to obliteration
    3. Re:it's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So,how many French Soldiers does it take to defend Paris?Answer-no one knows,it's never been tried.

    4. Re:it's ok by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      Beside, the "french" fries are Belgian. ;)

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    5. Re:it's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Sale: French rifle - never fired - dropped only once! Have many in stock.

    6. Re:it's ok by hungfarlow · · Score: 1

      Cool. Germans kill so good. I'm glad they're on our side.

      --
      Penguins are so sensitive to my needs - Lyle Lovett
  19. Re:MMMMM andrake (-: by leonbrooks · · Score: 4, Informative

    Speaking of which, Mandrake 9.1 final is due out next week, also with KDE 3.1 and other goodies. Free to download, 650MB ISOs so even the most antique CD drives and burners should be happy.

    Looking forward to Kolab maturing (due I think with KDE 3.2), will be an excellent tool for chasing the Borg-remnants out of many enterprises.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  20. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Matimus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Im not saying that your wrong, because you do make a point. But there are two things to keep in mind...

    1. This IS an international forum, (not only americans read /.)

    2. Germany may not be helping us, but I don't think that they are "the enemy", at least not yet.

    Becides the Germans are talking like we are trying to take over the world. Im not sure they would know what a successful attempt would look like. They are just mad because they are impotent and know it, the same goes for most of Europe. Im not sure exactly what my postion is with regards to your post, I guess I sort of agree. You might want to calm down before you have a stroke though.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  21. Not quite true... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Informative
    SuSE seems stable as all hell, and it's hardware detection is second to none.

    Both Mandrake and Knoppix clearly out-detect SuSE in some areas.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Not quite true... by Organic_Info · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Both Mandrake and Knoppix clearly out-detect SuSE in some areas."

      How? Where's the compasrison? or is it just the usual Slashdot "It's true because I say it is".

      Backup your statements or label it as opinion.

      --
      "Things that you own end up owning you" - Tyler Durden (via Diogenes of Sinope).
    2. Re:Not quite true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, you'll hear a number of "it's true because I say it is" tidbits under this post, which I'm sure will include:

      - Why should I pay for SuSE when I can download something else for free? This one is amusing, since you actually can download SuSE for free, just not the ISO images.

      - SuSE is great because you don't have to subscribe for updates, like in Redhat. Have any of the halfwits posting this ever actually used Redhat? You can update for free, with -and- without Redhat's updater.

    3. Re:Not quite true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever heard of supermount? guess not, since you're not using mandrake ... it's been doing the 'automagical' thing for a while now, so where's the big suse deal?

    4. Re:Not quite true... by ADRA · · Score: 1

      No, it's true because 'I' said it!!

      --
      Bye!
  22. Moderators... by ArmorFiend · · Score: 0

    moderate parent +1 funny :)

  23. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supportingterrorism by buyign a German company's product? i don't think so, not only does Germany have no ties to terrorism, but they are on our side.

    They just don't want us to go to war for oil and Israel. Isn't it enough we sent Israel 4 billion dollars of our taxes each year, shit the country only ahs 4 million people! That's like senting a 1000 dollrs toe very israelian.

  24. I AM AN AMERICAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AND YOU, MY FRIEND ARE CLEARLY MAD!

    Be rational for a minute. SuSE is a small German Linux company which is not yet profitable and has its headquarters in Germany as well as offices in the US. They do not have any power to decide if Germany supports the US in the inevitable war with Iraq, for all you know they might support it. It is greately unfair to boycott a comapny, ebcause it happens to be in an unfortunate political situation when teh company has no influence to change this situation.

    Furthermore, you can install SuSE as many times as you want on as many machines as you want, but you only have support for one machine. Supproting SuSE, is supproting the many projects SUSe sponsors and contributes to as wella s Linuc, it is not supporting what you call the "enemy".

    Germany is not US's enemy, they just oppose a war without serious proof, not just estimates and guesses decades old. Germany also sees that this war is nto about freedom, or the terrible ways in which Sadam abuses his power, it is about Oil and more oil. USA has supported dictators before and has even contributed to a large part of Sadam's army, and we were good allies before. WE knew he was doing this and why did we not act and what about all the other dictators. Come on, don't believe the cover up.

    Hitler was in power a long time ago and besides that if you didn't know, the Bush family supproted the Naziz and donated a large amount of money to them.

    Also Germany, has no ties to the attacks on 9/11 or terrorism. Where did you come out with so much shit. No wonder other antions don't like us. Judging by your post, I would definetely dislike America if many people thought like that.

    I suggest people use what suits them best not what is more "patriotic". What the original poster said is crazy talk.

    please take your medication

    1. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Wish every post on /. wouldnt have to end in a bunch of boring protest of us vs them why not just start another site something like propaganda.slashdot.org
      news for mullets, stuff that batters instead.

    2. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Organic_Info · · Score: 1

      It is with some irony the US/UK are labelled as only being after the oil when France has its own nice little Food for Oil scheme thats currently in place.

      Frances motives may not be a noble as they make out.
      .

      --
      "Things that you own end up owning you" - Tyler Durden (via Diogenes of Sinope).
    3. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by justin_speers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Germany also sees that this war is nto about freedom, or the terrible ways in which Sadam abuses his power, it is about Oil and more oil.

      Hate to turn this all political, but that's a silly thing to say. Well, maybe not... if you consider where the largest french oil company buys a lot of their oil. But then again, the french are the "good guys", so I guess we can look the other way there.

      Is George Bush a brilliant man? No, probably not.

      But he's not so stupid to think he can take over Iraq to use their oil. That's not his motivation. Can't anyone believe that he has good intentions, he's just going about things the wrong way? Where's the reasoning come from? Why does everyone think he's after oil?

      Do you really think the world would let him get away with something like that, or the American people?

      No.

    4. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by rsax · · Score: 3, Insightful
      USA has supported dictators before

      Yup, and it's sad how many people in the US seem to be oblivious to that fact. I was appauled when news first broke out that the current administration handed over $43 million to the Taliban. Maybe someone should have sent Dubya a memo that the Taliban are terrorists and that he claims he's against states who sponsor terrorism. Oh right, I forgot that was before 9/11.. now all of a sudden he has morals and ethics. These are the type of people sounding the drums for war, the need to spill so much innocent blood (yes Iraqi civilians will be killed in this war by the way) for pre-emptive strikes against US threats. Can North Korea or China launch pre-emptive strikes against the US or will that be terrorism? Maybe it's just me but it seems like Bush is the biggest threat to the US.

    5. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Tokerat · · Score: 0


      While the original post was an obvious troll and meant to catch a reaction like this, I'd like to add that I've actually run across people who follow the line of thinking this troll was trying to simulate. And frankly, it makes me want to move to Switzerland. Wake up, America. That is all.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    6. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by ftvcs · · Score: 1

      Do you really think the world would let him get away with something like that, or the American people?

      I don't think so, no..
      It's also to cover his fraud, bad politics, and gain popularity.

    7. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Admiral+Kirk · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's after the oil in the first place, it would just be a bonus.

      Think about this for a second, the American economy (same goes for Europe) is in a slope.
      Bush got elected in a questionable way (Florida anyone).

      His war on Afghanistan en now Iraq solve both problems, although the first one only temporary.
      Spending is up, on waepons en defense. Jobs are created, in the weapon industry which just happens to be one of Bush major sponsors.

      The facts support the theory that these wars have alterior motives:
      1. Bush father had Bin Laden's brohter killed
      2. Bush jr. had a small oil company, in which the victim of 1 had a major stake
      3. Bin Laden and most of the Taliban were trained by the CIA and Brittish intelligence to fight the Russian
      4. The CIA knew about 9/11 three weeks before it happened (Mosad intelligence)
      5. The USA admitted today that the UN was provided with fake evidence of Iraq having nuclear weapons!!!

      Can anyone calculate the probability of this being a coincidence?

      I think that someone with tight control over the press of a nation can and will get away with something like this> Hitler worked in this way too. Take a look through history and see.

    8. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      > (yes Iraqi civilians will be killed in this war by the way)

      They are still dying because of the last war. (childs mostly)
      And you are right. The Bush family seems to be the biggest threat for America. I'm curious about how much Americans are supporting Bush and it's 'holy' war ?

      Does the people for the war think it's good ? That the war is clean ?

      How people can believe only "military installations" were hit ? How can anyone believe "surgical striking" or whatever the name ?

      When the power of many Hiroshima is dropped on a country, how can anyone expect this to be "clean" ? Americans soldiers even blindly killed each others.

      I've seen the last "dissuasive" weapon. It's supposed to have the power of a small nuclear head. It's also supposed to be "surgical".
      I don't doubt that somewhere in the destroyed area there was a target. How the civilians around the buildings are labelled ? Collateral damage ?

      BTW : I would like to know the "official" explanation of the end of the last Gulf War. Everyone forgot that the war was stopped 24 hours too short ? Why move all those guys to "remove Saddam" and stop ?
      Instead of crushing the bad guy, the army was stopped by the current moron's daddy and enough power was gived to Saddam to crush the rebels.
      What was their explanation to the American people ?

      How anyone can believe ? Aren't the medias free ?

      Great ... now I feel sad and angry. And we are all OOC.

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    9. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by ftvcs · · Score: 1

      Instead of crushing the bad guy, the army was stopped by the current moron's daddy and enough power was gived to Saddam to crush the rebels.

      I think it was done to not create a vacuum of power in the region.
      I think saddam learned his lesson and his people deserve a second chance, saddam is no more evil than dubaya.

    10. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Seahawk · · Score: 0

      Even though I very much agree with your opinions, why isn't all these USA vs Iraq post modded to -1, Offtopic?!?

    11. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone calculate the probability of this being a coincidence?

      I can calculate the probability that you're a crackpot.

    12. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      ...except that Robert Scheer was spewing bullshit, not truth.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    13. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of Oil and the denied reasons for war, I heard an interesting theory that basicly Washington wants to break OPEC not because of the price of oil but because they are debating changing the official currency of OPEC to the Euro a move that would send the value of the us dollar plummeting as all of the European banks who hold dollars in order to facilitate the sale of Oil start dumping them onto the world market. Nixon took the dollar off of the gold standard and allowed the formation of OPEC with the agreement that OPEC would adopt the dollar as it's official currency effectively making the dollar a reserve currency tied to the price of oil. Anyone notice the Euro increasing in value lately? That hotel room in Paris looking a little pricey?

    14. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, at least the US and UK are noble enough to give the food and expect nothing in return ... what use could they have to to that thing? Oil? It is not as if the US is the biggest oil consumer in the world, is it?

    15. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by junk95 · · Score: 1

      > Do you really think the world would let him get away with something like that, or the American people?

      I case you haven't noticed, the world is not exactly thrilled
      about what Dubya is trying to do, and same goes for
      quite a few Americans.

    16. Re:I AM AN AMERICAN! by justin_speers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I case you haven't noticed, the world is not exactly thrilled
      about what Dubya is trying to do, and same goes for
      quite a few Americans.


      Kinda true. The first part anyway.

      Quit a few Americans aren't thrilled. But the vast majority DO support him, and I'd challenge you to find a poll that says otherwise.

      For the record, I don't support the war. I just think the "Bush-Bashing" gets way out of control sometimes, people stop arguing with what he says his reasons are for the war, and start making up silly reasons without anything to back it up.

      He's not going to become the dictator of Iraq (he wants to remove one), he's not going to take over all the oil supplies, and he's not going to intentionally murder everyone that doesn't convert to Christianity.

      That being said, a war isn't the right answer, because the Untied States will not be able to build a democracy in the middle east by itself. It will only create more instability, and I don't feel Saddam is a threat to the United States.

      I think he's wrong, but I don't think he has some kind of evil hidden agenda. That's a silly, childish thing that silly, childish people say.

  25. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, the Germans may not know what a successful attempt at world domination looks like, but they sure as hell know what an attempt in general looks like. Mostly it looks like marching down the Champs-Elysees.

    The Frogs know what it looks like too -- it's an upside-down view from between their ankles.

  26. Re:Anyone notice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You present it as if you SuSe is a victim of Redhat users here. The fact is that Redhat holds the "Most Hated Distro Award" among Slashdotters, and if there was ever a distro that was 'slagged', it was Redhat. You're presenting the post as a preemptive defense of SuSe from Redhat users is bullshit, because I never see these types of posts. You just want to rag on Redhat and tell everyone how you think SuSe is better, so you should just come out and say so.

    You claim that Redhat feels less complete, yet you give no real examples. I agree that Redhat was silly to not include the shutdown button in KDE and I'd love to know why they removed it, but you are acting as if it is some killer feature or something.. In fact, that is the most discussed item in your post, and you even speak of how your sales people were in awe as they watched you click on it (do you realize how silly that sounds?) and I wonder if you have anything better to mention besides the lack of a silly shutdown option from the K menu. I mean, I'm picturing some guys in suits, jaws dropped, watching in lust as you expose this unbelievable "Log Out" option in the K menu..

    Just come out with the the real point you want to make, which is the same one many other Redhat slaggers make: Redhat sucks because they did such and such to [insert KDE component here], my personal preference is [insert distro here].

    I'm getting really sick of the distro war bullshit. Use what you like, let other people use what they like. If your distro of choice is truly a good choice for someone, they will eventually try it and use it on their own. Quit beating dead horses.

  27. Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by Travoltus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the only way to get it is to buy it, screw that. I want to see what I get before I buy it.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by crusher-1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It hasn't even been released yet. Just finishe betas for crying out loud (lol).

    2. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by ctid · · Score: 4, Informative

      DISCLAIMER: I am a SUSE (8.1) user, but I've never tried this.

      What you do is to download their Live Evaluation CD. You then use that to download the rest via ftp. The link is to version 8.1.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    3. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by igrutje · · Score: 0

      I did a ftp install off the 8.0 release, that is *without buying* it that time.

      Will go to the store for the 8.2 though.

    4. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This version of SuSE isn't out yet, but yes you can do an FTP install of SuSE. If you go to ftp.suse.com and work your way through to the 8.1 tree of it [as 8.2 isn't out yet ;o)] then you can download the floppy disks / boot iso which should enable you to do an ftp install.

    5. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by lightcycle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Alternatively, just ftp the whole shebang to ur hdd. (if you can manage without the source rpm:s it's a couple of gigs. Then run the live cd, and youll have the possibility to mount your directory containing your packages. This will keep you fromin blind rage throwing your computer out the window when the ftp link dies mid-install. (And it probably will, trust me)

      DISCLAIMER:I tried this one or two minor versions ago, and it worked then. They may have changed sometheing now, to make it not work. Also, I don't remember if it was possible to make bootdisks for the old-fashioned of us./DISCLAIMER

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
    6. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by alanp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This really pisses me off.
      This is a typical example of take it for free, give nothing back.

      SuSE have put a lot of work into their distros and deserve to be paid for them.
      Once you buy it, you can update it for free.

      Why should they give away all their hardwork for free.

      Yeah yeah, debian do it, but they aren't paying people and don't have bills to cover.

      Stop whinging about getting it for free.
      SuSE costs money and if you don't like it don't buy it.

      I usually *purchase* one version in each major series of SuSE, not because I need to, but because I think
      a) it is worth it
      b) to support the company

      On the distro wars, f*ck it use which ever bl00dy distro you want and stop bitching about others.

      Free choice doesn't mean you have to slag off the competion.

      I think SuSE rocks and is the best distro by a long way for professional users.... if you want to use redhat or pinkcoat that's your choice....

      --

      Alanp

    7. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by nagora · · Score: 1
      SuSE costs money and if you don't like it don't buy it.

      Well, I think that was the original poster's point: s/he doesn't want to buy it if s/he doesn't like it. My experence of SuSE is that it is so bunged full of stuff that a free download has only a fraction of the utility of the bought version simply due to the lack of a manual. Why not let people try it on the basis that those that like it will buy the "real" thing to get the manuals?

      Also, of course, when you say "Why should they give away all their hardwork for free." you are implying that the SuSE team wrote the whole thing and that they did not rely on the freely-available tools (such as QT, gcc, Xine etc) that others allowed them to download to make their distro as good as it is.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    8. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by winne+too · · Score: 1

      i'm a suse 8.1 user as well, but i've never had a look at the live-evals.
      however, i do know for sure that 8.1 included a ~16mb iso which i used to install via ftp.

    9. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah yeah, debian do it, but they aren't paying people and don't have bills to cover.

      The hardware and bandwidth for Debian's servers don't grow on trees. Debian relies heavly on goodwill and donations from the Free software community and Major companies.

    10. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dunno in the US, but the european mirrors have been very good for me (since 7.1, dunno about before)

    11. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I think SuSE rocks and is the best distro by a long way for professional users.... if you want to use redhat or pinkcoat that's your choice....

      I am not so sure. I was using SuSE up until 7.2 and liked it (on the desktop) in fact my file / print / dhcp / mail server behind my firewall still is 7.2 but I haven't bothered upgrading. Why? Because it becomes bloated as a Server. As a workstation it would work out okay, but as a Server I think they overdid it. Much more so since they killed of YAST and only give you YAST2 which for remote administration (especialy over a slow connection) doesn't really make me very happy.

      So now I have a RH8 workstation which surprised me positivily after other dissapointments, I trie dMandrake but couldn't get my mouse to work with it (known problem apparantly), might change it to the new Slackware when it comes out.

      Maybe one day I go back to SuSE but right now I don't see any real reason, and I have used SuSE way back in '96.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    12. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      I assume your complaints about Yast2 over a slow connection have to do with the fact that it's a GUI application.

      You do know you can run it from a terminal? It also has a ncurses based interface.

      Yummy.

    13. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      No need to download the entire Live Eval, there's a 16M boot ISO or 4 floppy images (1 boot, 3 modules) you can use to kick off the install.

      I haven't tried an ftp install either, but I did switch my install source to ftp.suse.com, and it works fine. It's slower than the DVD, but then it can run in the background while my daughter watches her Powerpuff Girls, and I install/remove packages infrequently enough that I forget where I put the CD pouch I keep the DVD in...

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    14. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Much more so since they killed of YAST and only give you YAST2 which for remote administration (especialy over a slow connection) doesn't really make me very happy.

      YaST2 for remote administration sucked mightily in 7.x, but is much better in 8.x. However, it is not true that YaST is not available in 7.x, I used it on my 7.3 file server frequently, only subjecting myself to the pain of text-based YaST2 on the rare occasions when I needed to do something I couldn't do in YaST or with a quick text file editing.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    15. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      This isn't a TROLL you stupid moderators.

      GNU/Linux WAS designed to be free.

      Why don't you check out http://www.gnu.org sometime?

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    16. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      You do know you can run it from a terminal? It also has a ncurses based interface.

      Yeah I know that, but the last time I looked at YAST 2 in the terminal it first of all looked completly messed up and IMO it isn't as clean as the old one was.

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    17. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      YaST2 for remote administration sucked mightily in 7.x, but is much better in 8.x. However, it is not true that YaST is not available in 7.x, I used it on my 7.3 file server frequently, only subjecting myself to the pain of text-based YaST2 on the rare occasions when I needed to do something I couldn't do in YaST or with a quick text file editing.

      True but since version 8 AFAIK YAST is dead.

      The other problem was that SuSE8 caused a Kernel Panic on my computer directly after the install, so I only played with it a bit at work.

      I like SuSE, and maybe one day I go back to it, but for now RedHat 8 works just nicely.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    18. Re:Is there anywhere one can download SUSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutly agree. People should support both Redhat and SuSE because the contribute so much to the product as a whole.

      I have purchased SuSE about 8 times now (yes I even bought point releases). I feel good about supporting the company and in return I get better and better linux distributions with every release.

      Linux is free, but if you have the cash, buy the distro or donate!!!!!

  28. Re:Anyone notice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And before some grammar nazi points it out, that was supposed to be 'your presenting'.

  29. Buy it. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or wait 12 weeks for suse to release most of it on their mirrors. Then wait another 12 weeks to get connected and download it even if you have an OC12.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  30. Apparently...someone is behind the times by Arandir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amongst other nifty features, KDE 3.1 apparently includes tabbed browsing, the ability to sync with Exchange servers, a new administration tool called "Desktop sharing" that allows remote control of other desktops, and several interesting new crypto/security features.

    Wake up and smell the coffee! All these nifty new features are standard in KDE 3.1. Nothing apparent about it. You might have just as well said "SuSE will include KDE" and be done with it.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    1. Re:Apparently...someone is behind the times by RoLi · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Actually "it will include KDE" is a big plus.

      Just look at RedHat, they will probably cripple the hell out of desktop sharing because they don't want to make Gnome look bad.

      So yeah, "it will include KDE" is not a given today.

    2. Re:Apparently...someone is behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Has it not occurred to anyone that SuSE is marketing to non-users of Linux? They appear to be trying to gain new markets, rather than simply adjust market share. They know that previous users of other distros will move around, but if they can attract new users to their product, they may well keep them. If those users are corporations, they stand to do well financially on the maintenance upgrades of the installed base.

  31. Ever heard of eDonkey? by melted · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of eDonkey? I bet ISOs will be shared 15 minutes after they start selling actual boxes. Or maybe even earlier, if someone steals an unreleased *.ISO.

    1. Re:Ever heard of eDonkey? by capmilk · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of paying people for their effort? If you want to use SuSE's product, buy it. If you don't want to spend money for a Linux distribution, don't buy it.

    2. Re:Ever heard of eDonkey? by Ghengis · · Score: 1
      Why should SuSE get paid for their effort over Redhat, Mandrake, Debian, Slackware, Gentoo, Yoper, Sorcerer, etc... What makes SuSE so special? If all the other guys are making their ISO's available, then why should we pay SuSE just because they don't?

      --

      "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

    3. Re:Ever heard of eDonkey? by chadm1967 · · Score: 1

      What?!?!

      This has to be the most idiotic thing I've ever heard! If SuSE didn't make money, they would go out of business.

      They do offer their product for free.....They just don't offer ISO's.

    4. Re:Ever heard of eDonkey? by melted · · Score: 1

      See, I'm not saying I won't buy it. Maybe I will. But before I buy I'd like to try a full-blown product, not castrated demo version. I buy tons of audio CDs this way. I download music and buy CDs if I like it or delete it if I don't.

      Another thing is, I don't think paying $80 every god damn year is a good deal. I just don't think this such a high price is justified.

    5. Re:Ever heard of eDonkey? by B0mbtruck · · Score: 1
      See, I'm not saying I won't buy it. Maybe I will. But before I buy I'd like to try a full-blown product, not castrated demo version.

      That is the lamest thing I ever heard! How many games and other types have you bought after such a "review"? I am member of a computer science club that meets regularly and plays games. Many of the members, including boardmembers, are too cheap to buy the games they play at the LAN-party. Their excusses range from "no money" to "i got it for free" or "i am just testing it"! Lame, lame, lame. If you like the game then buy it.
      And about spending $80 a year, nobody forces you to go out and buy the latest and greatest. On the other hand, if you feel your dick won't compete anymore with the rest of us ...
    6. Re:Ever heard of eDonkey? by melted · · Score: 1

      I don't play games. At all. If I did, I'd have applied the same algorithm as to music.

    7. Re:Ever heard of eDonkey? by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      Because we're not all dirty hippies. :-P But really, it is a very comprehensive Linux Distro and I don't see why you couldn't make your own iso's, in any case most distros are bigger than a cd and that included dvd is a really quick way to do an install. I like it, so I buy it, if you didn't need the manuals you could always order the upgrade version for considerably less cash, I usually give the manuals away to a linux newbie anyhow.

  32. Re:Now really by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

    Don't worry now, it has a default blue motif.

  33. Re:Now really by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    Uhh... they switched to I'm in Love With Microsoft Blue with SuSE 8.1. Green is out.

    Or maybe... I'm in Love With a Brighter than Bluecurve Blue...

    ... something like that.

  34. I'm compelled to post this, by dsb · · Score: 1

    I've been using RH 7.3 because it works for me. Mostly internet browsing and wireless access point. The wireless was not quite fully supported but it was easy as heck to set up, so now I got a box that does nat, wireless ap to my ibook and my pops windows machine, and I got an old version of winex for that occasionally diablo or starcraft fix (which I have to remind myself how much I'm wasting time on playing games; another issue). And I just downloaded moz 1.3 stable after using 1.1 forever. I had slight problem with java and read in the release notes to make a symbolic link to that jvm file thingy rather than copy it to the moz directory. Sometime ago RH 8 came out, but why should I upgrade to that? Everything works fine for me. So I don't know anything about how RH 8 works, so I'm not going to 'slag' anything about it. I'm not even sure I'm using your slag term correctly. Suse, I'm sure is a fine product, I was certainly impressed when I was shipped a 6.3 version when I ordered quake 3.6 for linux through that linux game company way back when, so much so that I went out and bought suse 7.1, it worked for awhile but was lacking some small details. Point is that it was all a matter of timing, and I'm sure is still timing, for those of us really cheap users that don't want to spend for Enterprise Versions, but yet want to support the community in some way or another and don't really have any coding skills. So we occasionally buy a box set, but not every time a new version comes out.

    But what I really want to know is why the hell my fuji 3800 digi-cam doesn't not work in webcam mode for mac osx; that really ticks me off that it is windows only. (I've got live free pr0n to show)

  35. Re:This isn't about Iraq... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice of you , to understand us, small european nations who are being terrorized by germany and france. and who hope that all mighty america will save us. You must be really smart guy to talk in our name, do you even know where is slovenia, oh no not slovakia.


    And if you somehow do, don't assume to know how we think. We were just invited to nato, and only 47% wanth to join it, and 90% want to join European Union. And 80% are against war in Iraq. O fu.. , we wanth peace, so we just became your enemy.<br><br>
    Other thing that just shows how misinformed you are. What is the public support to war in britany (who is strong enougth, not to be bullied), and all countries except yours????<br><br>
    I know not all americans think that way, but it is sad that a lot do...<br><br>
    Sorry for my english, but i can better speak slovene.

  36. its all about WHO controls the oil it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's NOT about the oil per se, its about WHO controls the oil. think about it. IF you can.

    1. Re:its all about WHO controls the oil it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was just about oil, the US would be invading Venezuela to "stabilize" it's government - not Iraq

  37. GEW Genetically Engineered Woman by Herkules · · Score: 0

    "your armpit hairy woman"

    WOW!! US woman don't have hair growing in their armpits ?

    Are they GEW or is it from some kind of breading ??

    (I know this is of topic but it might be true?)

    --
    CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
  38. Re:SuSE is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be more concerned with French stuff.

  39. And Slackware 9 won't have... by Rooktoven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    oh, Slackware 9 (which is already at rc2) will have all these features. In fact, those of us running slackware-current already have them. I'm not saying Suse's not a nice distro, but we aren't exactly breaking new ground here.

    <wait for Gentoo/Debian comment>5 seconds</wait>

    --

    Acquiescence leads to obliteration
    1. Re:And Slackware 9 won't have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got your Gentoo right here!!! Kde 3.1 compiling as we sp34k. its as simple as "emerge sync && emerge kde". Portage ROX!!

    2. Re:And Slackware 9 won't have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I got your Gentoo right here!!! Kde 3.1 compiling as we sp34k. its as simple as "emerge sync && emerge kde". Portage ROX!!

      So, everytime you install a new package you have to compile it from scratch? How do upgrades work? does it build packages or just sit there and compile stuff and install it on the fly? Is there a way to back out changes? I wish Debian had a way to downgrade in case you upgrade something and it fucks stuff up. Like an automatic rollback to a previous state or something. I guess I should just run Windows XP.

    3. Re:And Slackware 9 won't have... by Xpilot · · Score: 1

      oh, Slackware 9 (which is already at rc2) will have all these features

      Don't you mean RC3? :) Very soon now guys...

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    4. Re:And Slackware 9 won't have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently converted to Gentoo from SuSE. I still like SuSE best as the overall windows replacement, but I wanted more of an enthusiast distro with the ability to rid myself of binaries forever :). To answer your questions:

      Lets get one thing straight though. This is not a distro for n00bs. This distro is aimed at the Linux enthusiast or hobbyist. On to portage......yes, EVERYTHING including the whole system is compiled from scratch based on your own customized optimization settings. This makes it the fastest distro bar none. All packages and their dependecies are configured, compiled, and installed automagically with only one command. For upgrading you just add the -u flag and it will safely upgrade. You can throw a -C flag to emerge to completely/safely uninstall an app.

      Ive got 4 Gentoo 1.4 RC3 systems up and running now (2 desktops and 2 servers) and this is my conclusion. Its probably the most painful and long install process ever.....(2 to 3 days on good hardware and broadband) But, the time invested is well spent. In the end you will have a system that has ridiculous performance advantages over anything out there and the best system (portage) for managing ALL your software. Portage in a word: r0>0rs. No dependencies problems...ever...no...really. Single command install, upgrade, or uninstall of ANYTHING. It just doesnt get much better than that to me. :-)

    5. Re:And Slackware 9 won't have... by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      gentoo does it also.

  40. Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by mrkrittman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best thing that could happen for all Linux distributions is for Microsoft to finally crack the activation process, so that you have no way of installing Windows without a license and a properly activated copy

    The thing is, anyone with any technical skills and access to the internet can get hold of a copy of Windows XP and install it for nothing. Same goes for office. Witness the activation cracks, Devils-Own releases, and so on. Bottom line, Windows XP/Office XP is effectively free, and it's a better desktop/gaming/multimedia experience than any Linux distro. The day that you can no longer install Windows for free is the day the average slashdot person finally puts all of his/her effort into Linux.

    Microsoft know this, and that's why they still make it possible for the average techy to install and run Windows XP/Office XP at no cost, therefore negating the major benefit of Linux. They prefer people to pirate Windows and Office because it stops them making an effort with Linux.

    1. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just curious, why on earth do they put time,
      money and effort into something they really don't
      want then? Just wondering...

    2. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Yep - every Msft product should be sold with an activation process, either by making a voice call or activating over the Internet with a clearly labled text box saying so. Why? Because, technically it is the property of the Msft corp. Let them manage their own property. Msft asking customers to maintain license databases and keep it current with all the upgrades and changes that happen in normal business is yet another cost they foist on consumers. The way it is, Msft and their jackbooted thugs at the BSA want YOU to manage THEIR property, and threaten you with fines if you can't produce the invoices and proof of purchase. Screw that. Msft should manage their own damn property with their own database of licenses legally procured - that is, every license purchase should be registered and get an activation key or it stops running. That way they won't have to play the threatening license audit game. Will Msft do that? Probably not, since they know tolerating a high piracy rate helps keep them #1. The current payoff strategy, which is working, is "let them use it for free for a while, and when they're good and hooked, and can't switch w/o extensive, expensive retraining, then we scare the hell out of them with lawers and rake it in!".

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    3. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by mrkrittman · · Score: 1

      There are variations on the practice of 'acceptable levels of piracy as well'

      Sony with the PS2 (and even MS with the XBOX) by using normal CD-ROMs for media, but with the console being chippable, make it possible for technically-savvy users to pirate games whilst the majority of users go out and buy the software. These technically-savvy people are often the 'opinion-formers', are more into games, and therefore become advocates of a console where co-incidentally the games are free for them.

      Sega got it wrong by making it too easy to pirate games for the Dreamcast (not needing a mod-chip) and consequently every joe in the street could get hold of and run pirated games. Therefore the Dreamcast quickly died as a going financial concern as the paid-for software market just collapsed.

      Arguably, Nintendo have gone too far the other way, with both the N64 and the Gamecube, with non-standard media (cartridges and mini-cds) which killed the pirate market but meant that no opinion-formers/tech-savvy/pirates bothered buying the system.

      The trick seems to be - allow people like us to get hold of the software for free, as if the technology is good and the software costs nothing we'll go for it, regardless of the open-source/proprietary arguments, but make it sufficiently difficult for the average person to pirate it as they'll buy it anyway, and will do so given the enthusiastic userbase of tech-savvy hardcore games who run it for free.

      If Microsoft *really* want to cut out pirate copies, they can do - witness the activation procedures with MS Plus Digital Media Edition; there's plenty of warez copies floating around Kazaa, Edonkey/Overnet and so on, but they won't install without product activation. No exceptions, therefore no working pirated copies on the net.

    4. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you have a problem with your conscience. Otherwise you wouldn't spend 5 paragraphs rationalising your theft of other's property.

    5. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by mrhandstand · · Score: 1
      One word...3 letters...BSA. XP might be free to home users. IF they don't give a damn about IP rights. But in the business arena, MS products HAVE to be paid for AND licensed. Because a failed license audit is like getting raped by a rabid bull.

      As for the IP rights issues...I don't like MS any more than the rest, but it is their product. I'm not forced to buy it. I won't steal someone elses hard work. It's called ethics.

      --
      Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
    6. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by blitzrage · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. I think that Microsoft basically gives away the OS for free if you are able to get it yourself, but cripples it enough that you can't do updates etc.. so that if you want to update it, then you need to purchase it. I'd almost like to see Microsoft go all the way and make it impossible to run the software with illegal copies. Or do what some of the games do and not allow you internet access without a legitamite key. That'd make a lot of people turn to Linux real quick.

      Honestly, I've used a lot of Linux distro's, but never SuSE. This new 8.2 version has totally peaked my interest and I'm going to be interested to see how it runs and works. If it's as good as it sounds, then SuSE could become my new preferred desktop platform. My only fear is that it's slower than XP.

      --

      I have no signature
    7. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      If it's as good as it sounds, then SuSE could become my new preferred desktop platform. My only fear is that it's slower than XP.

      The speed of your user experience will depend greatly on what wm you use. My personal preference is WindowMaker. SuSE does a good job of supporting environments other than KDE, so all my apps are added to the menues just like they are under KDE, and I can still use the KDE stuff that I like without much issue.

      The other thing is remember to activate DMA for your HDD, as that will make a huge difference (cut my boot time by about 70% when I finally remembered to do that in SuSE 8.1). This is really easy to do in YaST, but it isn't set that way by default.

      Anyway, my SuSE 8.1/WinXP comparison should be taken with a big grain of salt because of the system differences, but here it is:

      SuSE was on a slot Athlon 700 with 384M PC100, DMA not enabled. KDE felt a little sluggish, but not too bad, only a little slower than Win98SE on the same machine. With WindowMaker it is much faster than Win98SE.

      XP was on a P-3 550 with 128M of unknown speed RAM, I don't know about DMA. It was painfully slow. SP1 helped a lot, but it was still much slower than I think the hardware difference would account for. For some unknown reason, floppy access was especially slow.

      Anyway, like I said, it really isn't a fair comparison, but there it is. As long as you remember to enable DMA, SuSE should feel a lot faster than XP on the same hardware.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    8. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by frinkyone · · Score: 1

      if bill gates came to my fucking front door with a truck full of free XP officeXP or what ever, i would tell him to go back to redmond and take his truck full of free bullshit with him. true most anyone with computer know how can crack ms software. why even bother? it fucking sucks!! lazy ass script kiddies!! try adding your own code to XP kernel. oh wait you CAN't!! XP came with my laptop but i erased it the minute i got it home.

    9. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by frinkyone · · Score: 1

      why steal a yugo, when someone is giving away free mercedes

    10. Re:Linux won't take off whilst Windows is free. by blitzrage · · Score: 1

      My friend runs WinXP on a PII-233 with 196 megs of RAM and he does quite a bit with it, including creating Flash movies. It is a bit slow, but he does get away with a lot of things that he wouldn't have been able to get away with, with previous versions of Windows. I wonder if I could sneak into his house at night, install SuSE 8.2 and the XPde and see if he notices :)

      --

      I have no signature
  41. Dang! by grolschie · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just finished copying all 7 CD's of 8.1 and they release another. I just SuSE had apt, then I could upgrade easy.

    1. Re:Dang! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is apt for SuSE.

      apt for SuSE

  42. Re:Now really by rsax · · Score: 2, Funny
    I've never liked SuSE. And not because it's a bad distro or because it needs a quite powerfull computer to work fine. It's beacause of that damn sick green.

    "Random Linux Distro" Kshu, we've just released the ultimate linux distro! It integerates seamlessly with just about any piece of software you can think of!! Please download our ISO's or buy our cd's.

    "Kshu" Wow! Finally I can use decent, stable softwa.. wait a minute. Green?!! GREEN!!!! Fuck that!

  43. Let me gues Alex! You live in the US ? by Herkules · · Score: 0

    "to force everyone into this European Union that they are trying to structure so that France and Germany run it"

    Let me gues Alex! You live in the US ?

    No one is forceing any one into the European Union! And Germany and France are not runing it!

    BR Darwin

    --
    CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
  44. What about Debian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried Mandrake, Red Hat, SuSE and finally Debian. Well I don't have much too say about it except that it NEVER angered me by any means. It just works, and everything I compile, compiles and works.

    And APT made me stop caring about if it is *.deb or *.rpm. It's just cool and for free.

    But I liked SuSE also. RedHat left the impression on me I had when I tried SuSE 6.x and Mandrake is RedHat based(!) but much more advanced in many things like for example installation and hardware detection.

  45. "real thick and sexy muffs" by Herkules · · Score: 0

    =| Yes ... no well ... hmm sir ....

    Sexy?

    --
    CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    1. Re:"real thick and sexy muffs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, the kind you need a weed-whacker to navigate

      Those rule!

    2. Re:"real thick and sexy muffs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're gross. Wait til some chick actually lets you go down on her someday and you get a hair stuck in your teeth, then you'll understand why gentlemen prefer it "high and tight"

  46. Re:SuSE is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you could talk us through your logic here - you might also want to tell us what country you're from ... so we can all check out its wonderful peaceful credentials. You'll also find that Linux developers come from all round the world. Perhaps you'd care to develop Xenophobux, so that you and your racist chums can play on that.

  47. Random features by Asdex · · Score: 4, Informative
    Suse promises to include:

    "The KDE scanning application Kooka and the commercial OCR tool Kadmos enable users to scan both printed and hand-written texts into the word processing application."

    "With the comfortable and enhanced SuSE configuration profile manager, notebook users, who commute between different locations, can switch to the network and hardware configurations of every office site and therefore, can use scanners and printers of the respective location with a simple mouse click."

    "[...] and the possibility to store folders in the running system in a crypto file system without the need for a new partitioning." That sounds really cool.

    Read the full announcement at http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_release s/archive03/82.html

  48. Network Updates by dusty123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WHAT ???
    The SuSE Online Update (YOU) is the worst piece of s*** I've ever seen.

    Before downloading the actual packages, first so called package descriptions are downloaded. Although this is a good idea, they download one file with the description for every single available update package. This description downloading - although the sum of the descriptions is less than 1MB, takes around 2 hours now. (At the beginning, when SuSE 8.1 was new, it was fast as there were nearly no updates, now there are hundreds). The reason for this is that the "get" request from the FTP-server takes long to get through.

    In SuSE versions 8.0, they seemed to fork the whole YaST for every description download. I had a P-166 running with 128MB RAM, and when downloading the descriptions for 100+ packages, YaST was also forked 100+, that exceeded my 128MB Memory and YOU crashed.

    Moreover, in SuSE 8.1, the update was not synced with the rpm database. If you updated a package directly via rpm, YOU would not know it and would download the package once again and even conflict afterwards with the by-hand installed package (!).

    Besides YOU, SuSE is really o.k. for me, I like it personally. I hope soooo much that the online update is better in 8.2.

    Moreover I hope that one can save his configuration of the installed rpm's into a file, like this was possible in SuSE 8.1. When installing a second machine, I had to select all packages BY HAND rather than simply reading a configuration file. SuSE support told me they will include this feature in a later version.

    Very important would also be that the mozilla java-plugin at last works. Konqueror is nice, but a lot of webpages are NOT working with it. Mozilla is far more compatible.

    1. Re:Network Updates by twener · · Score: 1

      2 hours? You should use a faster ftp mirror or use Fast OnlineUpdate for SuSE (http://fou4s.gaugusch.at/).

    2. Re:Network Updates by dusty123 · · Score: 1

      I tried a lot of FTP mirrors, there is even one at my university that is really fast but this makes hardly any difference.

      I am only connected with a 64kbit ISDN line, this makes things somehow slower but as I said the real reason seems to be the way the description files are downloaded.

      Moreover I can't see any reason why YOU would download ALL description files, regardless if I did an update only 1 day before. Why can't YOU simply store those files to speed things up?

      Anyway - hopefully things will get better in future versions of YaST.

      Thank you for your link to this YOU-Replacement, I will give it a try - but the simple availability of such repacements speak a lot about the quality of the original SuSE Product.

    3. Re:Network Updates by wik · · Score: 1

      One thing I'd really like to see is a version of YOU that really meant "YOU". That is, I'd like to have a tool that lets me build nightly updates/custom packages for a growing compute cluster that I manage. If nothing else, I'd like to see some documentation on what YOU expects, so I could set up my own server.

      SuSE seems to have great tools, with some annoying quirks. I'm particularly impressed with the AutoYaST (auto-installer), which handles every difference between my machines gracefully, except whether they are using IDE or SCSI disks.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    4. Re:Network Updates by twener · · Score: 1

      Didn't SuSE partner with Ximian to introduce Red Carpet Enterprise to their corporate products recently? press release

    5. Re:Network Updates by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I agree it's a problem, but I think it's something they did in 8.1. I've been using SuSE since 6.3, and Online Update has never been anywhere near as slow as it is in 8.1. It's also a frequently reoccuring thread on the SuSE newsgroups. Personally, I think they should ditch the "new and improved" 8.1 YOU and go back to the version in 8.0, which was nearly perfect.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:Network Updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just dont specify the device name and it would automatically takes the first drive, nevermind SCSI or IDE

  49. Re:SuSE is... by Jim+the+Bad · · Score: 1

    You buy Camembert to rub it in? I thought I was the only one!

    --
    -- And when Justice is gone, there is always... Force. --Laurie Anderson, "Oh Superman"
  50. Boxed Set comes with a manual -- by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

    ...And the manual is even useful for a lot of things. The one that came with 7.2 saved me a ton of aggrivation. Plus you get the bad (and sometimes humorous) German to English translation. :)

    I'll probably get the boxed set for 8.2 when I get a new computer to take advantage of it. I run on really ancient *(@&$. I like having the DVD's and CD's handy if I foul something up majorly.

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  51. Potential for problems.... by respite · · Score: 1

    I see lots of potential problems with this. Yes they have put hard work into their tools and distro, but there is a fine line between making sure you don't get out right robbed by everyone taking advantage of your work, and benefiting out of the much harder work of countless people, who have poured so much into what amounts to the largest part of your product(linux kernel, the desktops, and almost all your apps).
    I don't necessarily think Suse has crossed the line but then again getting robbed of their hard work hasn't come close to happening, take Redhat as indication as well, and of course the business with the iso's and non-copyleft software and their attitude in general to giving back in some areas seems to lean in the wrong direction.

    Maybe we have just come to expect getting everything for free when it comes to linux, but then again why shouldn't we? The truth is this was all started and grown out of our hard work, it wasn't meant to be popular or successfull even, but it was always about utter openness and complete sharing. If this makes it difficult and unrealistic for business, all the better I say, it was never intended for that.

  52. Scratch what I said. by X · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I realized it's only supporting the WebDAV protocol for synching with Exchange 2000 or later. It still doesn't do the MAPI-over-RPC native protocol of Exchange.

    --
    sigs are a waste of space
  53. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Admiral+Kirk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apart from the fact that you are obviously mad, or George Bush (if there even is a difference).

    There were Europeans in thos buildings too, you know.
    Siemens, a major German company, had offices there.

    Germany, France and the rest of Europe do not support Bin Laden or Saddam (which are two different matters anyway).

    But Europe is not a puppet for the USA either.
    If the US want European support, they'll have to offer some evidence that is not faked (admitted by the US prime minister) or bought (23 million $$$ to a Taliban defector!)

  54. Re:MOD +5 FUNNY! (really!) by Troy+H+Parker · · Score: 0

    because you have issues? lighten up francis

  55. Re:SuSE is... by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1
    I've had to give up eating French Fries since France became a communist based country that supports terrorism and globalisation! Worse still, I can't wear after shave now either cause it's all made by those facist Frenchies!

    ;->

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  56. Re:MMMMM andrake (-: by twener · · Score: 1

    From where do you know that Mandrake ISOs will be available (immediately)?

  57. Re:Now really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh... they switched to I'm in Love With Microsoft Blue with SuSE 8.1. Green is out.

    Actually I think that the 'blue' probably came from Mac OSX's Aqua interface.

  58. Re:Ximian... where art thou? by twener · · Score: 1

    In my opinion Ximian has missed the desktop train due to the hard Gnome 1->2 transition. How many months still until a stable Gnome 2 version of Abiword, Galeon and Evolution not mentioning Ximian Gnome 2 desktop?

  59. 5 cds or 2 dvds? by joeler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Prior versions had 1 dvd that contained everything contained on the included 6 cds. Now they use 2 dvds and only 5 cds - it appears the people without dvd players to install the software will be getting less in the professional package. How else can they explain the need for another DVD at the same time they are reducing the amount of software cds. Is it SuSE way of slowly abandoning those customers that do not own dvd players?

    --
    >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
    1. Re:5 cds or 2 dvds? by riggwelter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The second DVD contains the sources, the first mirrors the binary contents of the 5 CDs. It's controversial, but complies with the GPL (they are distributing the sources along with the binaries).

      The number of people without DVD drives is dwindling too...

      --
      Listening for the sound of the coming rain...
    2. Re:5 cds or 2 dvds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're saying the sources are only on dvd? That would be controversial.

      As you say, dvd drives are becoming common, but it is still illegal to play dvd movies on Linux, not so? Can I be the only Linux user who won't buy a dvd drive because of this? SuSE should provide the source on cds.

    3. Re:5 cds or 2 dvds? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      IIRC, 8.1, and maybe 8.0 also, had 7 CDs (I split the cost with a friend, I get the DVD and he gets the CDs, so I don't pay that close attention). Must of 5 and all of 6 and 7 are source, which is now on the second DVD.

      One will still be able to do a full install off the CDs, and with the way YaST works it's extremely rare that anyone will want to access the source anyway, and in those cases (mplayer comes to mind) it's likely that they would prefer to grab it straight from CVS anyway. All the source will still be available from SuSE by ftp as well.

      When you're pressing the disks in a production run, it makes a lot more sense to press one DVD than 2 or 3 CDs, especially for something that is hardly ever used. It could easily represent a significant savings for SuSE.

      Besides, you can get a DVD-ROM for $28, including shipping. Even a starving college student could afford one by simply skipping pizza or beer for a week.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  60. Re:SuSE is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So I guess you're another one of those donut-munching Homer Simpson neo-conservatives who eat "freedom fries" now, eh?

    Fucking trailer trash Americans you know nothing of world affairs except what your Zionist news media shovels into your brainwashed skulls.

  61. I remember... by Vajsvarana · · Score: 1

    ... something like: "A distro worth using is a distro worth buying" :-)

  62. Wow. What a lame troll. nt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  63. All this talk of "screenshots", "How it looks"... by Ghengis · · Score: 1
    All this talk of screenshots, how the text looks, and what-not is alot of dretch. People, the look of the window manager is a product of the window manager, NOT the distro. The text looks good be cause they use truetype fonts. The colors are cool because someone created themes/images that look that way. All the Distro has done is slapped all this stuff together, added a few programs to make things easier to config and install for the newbs, and said, "Pay us 40 dollars for selling you something that is MOSTLY someone else's work!" If you want your desktop to look L33t, save your money and open you desktop configuration program. You can make Slackware 3.x look just as cool if you compile KDE 3.1 and a few themes/backgrounds.

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  64. Re:SuSE is... by Jim+the+Bad · · Score: 1
    Jesus christ man, take a stress pill....then look up the word 'irony' in a dictionary.

    I think you might find BlackHawk might be yanking your chain just a little.

    --
    -- And when Justice is gone, there is always... Force. --Laurie Anderson, "Oh Superman"
  65. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Europe is not a puppet for the USA either.

    The crux of the whole disagreement, they yearn for a time when they were the most powerful nations on earth. Before the Soviet Union kept them pissing themselves too often for this crap too come out.

    If the US want European support, they'll have to offer some evidence that is not faked (admitted by the US prime minister) or bought (23 million $$$ to a Taliban defector!)

    Obvioulsy of the learned caste....Prime minister??? As far as I remember the bribe went to the defector in order to catch the big hairy al quada military guy.

  66. Those looking for a fresh Linux desktop distro... by salimma · · Score: 1

    .. might want to try looking at Ark Linux, the latest alpha of which was recently featured in an OS News interview.

    Red Hat compatible RPMs, latest KDE (the CVS of 3.1.1), simplified configuration (looks a bit like WinXP, I'm tempted to see if my folks back home would like it), and the lead developer is Bero of Red Hat KDE and dvdrecord fame.

    And did I mention Apt? :)

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
  67. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Bulln-Bulln · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen in the news how you US Americans are boycotting french products.
    Renaming French Fries to Freedom Fries. That's by far the most stupid thing I EVER heard.
    Why is the USA so powerfull? Well, we in Germany (old Europe, you know) have a saying that tranlates about like this: "The dubmest farmers harvest the biggest potatoes". Oh well.

    Oh, and how you are bocotting french wine: You BUY the wine and then you dump the wine in the sewerage. These pictures looked EXACTLY like the pictures of arabs burning a US flag - except there's no flag involved.
    And you claim to live in the civillized world while arabs are uncivillized sandmonkeys.

    And one last thing: Don't forget that the Statue of Liberty is a present from france. Burn it down.

  68. Be Dope Linux is still the best by Bulln-Bulln · · Score: 1, Funny

    Be Dope Linux is by far the best Linux distro. Unlike all the other distros, Be Dope Linux has a killer feature called AVN (Advanced Version Numbering).
    Ha! Beat that, SuSE!

  69. Re:All this talk of "screenshots", "How it looks". by Ghengis · · Score: 0

    LOL... f34r |\/|y |\|33k1D 1337, 5k1||5

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  70. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Admiral+Kirk · · Score: 1

    Ok, you're countering logic and facts with:
    "pissing themselves too often for this crap..."

    You must be a member of the republican party...

    "the bribe went to the defector in order to catch the big hairy al quada military guy"
    Was this *defector* less guilty of those crimes? Yet he is being treated better than the average American (no pension, no healthcare, ...)

    And besides, evidence comming from bribes cannot be trusted. It may offer leads but has no value in itself.
    Yet such evidence was also entered to proof that Saddam had certain weapons.
    And now, your *Prime Minister* looks the fool he is by having to admit that it is false.

  71. Free network install for SuSE 8.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is a small (about 40MB) boot iso you can download from SuSE's ftp site. It makes a bootable CD from which you can do a network install from an ftp or http mirror. I've done this 4 or 5 times and had no trouble really . . . if the mirror is fast. I ususally leave it going over night. I don't know if 8.2 will have this ability as well, but you might want to check in to it. SuSE is the best desktop version of Linux I have ever used. I really enjoy using it. I finally broke down and bought the CD's though mostly to support SuSE.

    1. Re:Free network install for SuSE 8.1 by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Last time I looked the boot iso was 16MB, or you could do it with 4 floppies (1 boot, 3 module)

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  72. Desktop Sharing by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 1

    I liked it better the first time around when it was called VNC

    --
    1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
  73. Syncing with Zaurus by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    What kind of capabilities will SuSe 8.2 have for syncing with a Zaurus?

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Syncing with Zaurus by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 1
      What kind of capabilities will SuSe 8.2 have for syncing with a Zaurus?

      Heck if I know. However, you can install the usbdnet module, as described here, then grab the Qtopia desktop environment from trolltech.com/qtopia, then you're set. This should work for any distro, not just SuSE. If you have a Zaurus, I'm really surprised you didn't find this information via Google and try it out months ago.

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    2. Re:Syncing with Zaurus by Erwos · · Score: 1

      Multisync is in the middle of adding Opie support. This should be relatively compatible with the Zaurus, or only a patch or two away from it.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  74. The Zen View by LazloToth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, SuSE and RedHat are not separate entities, but part of all Linux. And Linux is part of all operating systems.

    So there is no "either/or" - - all are the same. The one you have before you in this moment is the only one, and at the same time, it is every one. Give your full attention to the OS before you, and see all that it is. When you run Redhat, everything is Redhat; when you run SuSE, everything is SuSE. There is no quality that is "SuSE." There is no quality that makes RedHat "RedHat." What will you take away from SuSE to make it not-SuSE? So there is no identity to take away, or to give. There is no form to take away. In emptiness, we are all one.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  75. No cost SuSE installs from ftp.suse.com mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very simple two choices :
    1) Use http or ftp install (it is easy and you may use a proxy cache)
    2) Download a Live! Eval ISO
    Does it really make sense to provide download ISO's of a distro that is > 5.5GB? SuSE already comes for 8.1 on 7 CD's, now 8.2 2 DVDs and 5 CDs.
    Just download what you need not everything!!

  76. Gentoo compile time by PapaZit · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that the argument is "It's hard" or "It can't be done." I don't use Gentoo because I don't want to lose use of my computer for the day or two that it can take to compile everything. Gaining 10% more speed isn't worth losing the use of my computer for a day every time a major update appears. With a slow computer, the compile time's a killer. With a fast machine, the extra efficiency is even less worthwhile.

    --
    Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
    1. Re:Gentoo compile time by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      1. You don't have to compile everything. The installation (of the OS) can be done from different stages, each having different amount of compiling. Stage 1 compiles everything, stage 3 compiles alot less.

      2. In my case, I left the laptop compiling for the night. In the morning it was finished. I continued with the installation, left it compiling and went to work. When I got back, it was finished. Then I installed Xfree and Fluxbox. I lost very little productive time, since it compiled during the time I wouldn't have used the machine in the first place

      3. How often do you install big packages (like KDE)? Not very often I guess. You usually do it just once and then forget about it. Now, if you installed and re-installed entire KDE every week, you might have a reason to complain. But how many do that? Not many.

      4. When I upgrade the machine, I do it before I go to bed. By the time I wake up, it has finished compiling. No productive time lost.

      5. The difference in performance IS noticeable! And besides, I like the feeling that I'M in control.

      6. Gentoo is really up-to-date, unlike some other distros (*cough*Debian*cough*)

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:Gentoo compile time by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Actually, you only have to compile the system once. After that, everything is incremental. I just run "emerge world" overnight once a week, and it keeps my system nice and up-to-date. I don't really use Gentoo for the efficiency (though I've noticed it to be a nice bit faster than say RedHat 8.0) but because the package manager is hands down the best available (slightly edgeing out APT due to more flexibility) and there is an awesome community posting great help and new build scripts on the Gentoo forum.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  77. End of the rotating presidency by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    The Paris-Berlin combination is trying to eliminate the rotating presidency and change the power structures in the EU to limit control to the larger

  78. Re:Now really by kikensei · · Score: 0

    As of 8.1 it's blue not green.

  79. Changes in the EU, end of rotating presidency... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the dupe, dog hopped on keyboard

    The Paris-Berlin combination is trying to eliminate the rotating presidency and change the power structures in the EU to limit control to the larger nations. The countries wanted into the EU, but France is trying th change what makes up the EU now that they are in.

    I worded things wrong, France and Germany is trying to use the nations desire for enterance into the EU (and those markets) to take over control of Europe. Within 10 years, France and Germany will have dominated the EU, and gained significant control over all the peoples of Europe, unless the current leaders and the US figure out a solution.

    If your media wasn't so busy brainwashing you with one sided stories, you might know what's going on. But instead, the rich and educated "Europeans" have decided that the lowly French, British, German, Dutch, etc., citizens can't handle it. So the people of the countries will have it all done for them, and their nation-states will slowly be destroyed.

    The American media has MANY problem. However, at least because of the market conditions, they try to make news accessible. The European news that I've seen is like the NPR crap in this country, a bunch of left wing nuts taking federal money to talk down to people and feel all enlightened about it. Unfortunately, you aren't considered "capable" of seeing what is actually going on, and instead you look at US news sources and just shake your head because it is so different.

    Ah well, the old European Union was a step in the right direction. I don't think you'll like the new one built in its name.

  80. Re:All this talk of "screenshots", "How it looks". by Thanatiel · · Score: 1
    ... Pay us 40 dollars for selling you something that is MOSTLY someone else's work! ...


    What you pay for is the proprietary tools, the configuration, the packaging, the manual and the support ...mostly.

    Anyone is free to get Slackware and download & install whatever he wants on it.
    Anyone could do it from scratch as well.

    service = money

    --
    Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
  81. steering AWAY from the xenophobic right wing nuts by ilumin8d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Im not sure where so many people have got the idea that SuSE is not free any more. SuSE, like all linux, is and always will be free.

    Perhaps part of the confusion stems from the commercial (ie paid for by SuSE) software that is bundled with SuSE when you purchase a distro but is not available to download for free. I buy the professional distro EVERY minor version release, not because I need to but because I want to support SuSE. In yast, the SuSE set up tool, you may set the installation medium to be the SuSE ftp site and update all you want. You can install from scratch like this as well and even update your core system (although this will require you to burn a FREE to download cd also)

    Just because a company lets you buy their linux distro in a shiny box with a bunch of lovely manuals, some cool stickers (which im glad to say are back in 8.1 after 8.0s notable absence) and literally tens of thousands of software packages, many of which you would otherwise have to PAY FOR, I really dont see why anyone complains.

    ISOs are available for non i386 SuSE distros, but as has already been pointed out, downloading nearly 6 gigs when you are not even going to install it all seems a tad wasteful on the old bandwidth. Bandwidth which I might add SuSE have to pay for somewhere along the line. If you can afford the time online to download 7 CDs then you will have no problem installing the system you want over ftp.

    SuSE Linux can be downloaded for FREE from: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/
  82. So what? by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Errr...my slackbox does that too. Just plug in and mount it. Thats all there is for USB-drives. And if i type mpg321 /home/lispy/motörhead.mp3 i can hear a tune, so whats your point?

    cu,
    Lispy

  83. Sure, Linux is lacking because . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    "average slashdot person finally puts all of his/her effort into Linux."

    all the really great hackers prefer XP and consider an OS experience like Linux to be a pain . . .

    For some reason I feel that if someone picks XP over Linux, they are NOT the type of person that enjoys hacking their OS and adding non-existent features.

    Sure I wish you people would see the light and all switch to Linux, but I am pretty sure that those ABLE to contribute the most to the community have already switched. Or do you all really think that the community is missing out from you 7331 4aXor skillz?

    Economics calls it "diminishing returns." The first people to use Linux had much greater marginal benefit to the community than a later group of people that just made the switch. Besides, I get the feeling that by the time people like you switch, no major improvents in Linux as a Desktop will be needed . . . and you all will be bragging how smart you are 'cause you know Linux. Go figure.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  84. Re:Now really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blue for "Personal" - Green for "Professional"

  85. I just want to know one thing by r_arr · · Score: 1

    If all the sites I found that carry Suse 8.1 iso's, will they be carrying suse 8.2 iso's. It's hard to have to find new iso mirrors.

    1. Re:I just want to know one thing by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

      If all the sites I found that carry Suse 8.1 iso's, will they be carrying suse 8.2 iso's. It's hard to have to find new iso mirrors. It's tough to find ISO's for the most recent SuSE distro, because (and I may be wrong) they don't make the ISO's available until the next version comes along. It's still possible to get an iso, but somebody has to make it and post it first.

      I have 8.1 installed now, but to do that I downloaded the ftp-install iso image and installed via ftp. Unless you're going to install on a bunch of machines, it's quicker to do an ftp install anyway.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    2. Re:I just want to know one thing by r_arr · · Score: 1

      Well I just want to install it on to my desktop and on my laptop.

  86. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This should be modded 5, Funny.

    BTW, Chrysler is a German company too, so if you drive a Jeep, you're supporting the Nazis.

  87. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've seen in the news how you US Americans are boycotting french products.
    Renaming French Fries to Freedom Fries. That's by far the most stupid thing I EVER heard.
    Why is the USA so powerfull? Well, we in Germany (old Europe, you know) have a saying that tranlates about like this: "The dubmest farmers harvest the biggest potatoes". Oh well.


    Please don't make hasty generalizations, or otherwise you're just as bad as the people that do these things. I agree, it's stupid, and wasteful. It is especially wasteful when people buy the wine and then pour it out. They're pouring money down the drain because they feel it might offend the French. Too bad this accomplishes nothing other than supporting the French wine business or perhaps the American alcoholic sewer rat population.

    Some of us realize the sacrafices and the effort put forth by France back during the American revolution. While it was not completely selfless (it was done, as I remember, to help expel their rival, England, from the new world), it was important. I am a group of Americans that realize this and I don't go out and start boycotting French goods or demanding that all of the American GIs in Normandy are dug up and brought back to the US. (Yes, there are people as insane as that.) Without France, we wouldn't have our freedom. "Some of us remember why the Statue of Liberty points to the east." (Stolen from kfg)

    Having said that, I am not anti-American. I am an American that feels that, with the proper proof, the US has the moral authority to go into Iraq alone. Why do I hold this view? Because Saddam broke the terms of a cease fire the ended the Gulf War. In that cease fire, he agreed to destroy and stop persuing weapons of mass destruction. Now, remember, I feel that we need adequate evidence to do that, and as of yet, I haven't seen it (unlike a majority of my friends that feel we should nuke Iraq * sigh *). If I should see it, I would support the US-led war against Iraq. War sucks, but sometimes diplomacy fails.

    Oh, and I believe that the UN's vote on a new resolution, which does not prima facia authorize immediate military action, determines if they are relavant to today's world. Remember what happened in Serbia when the UN would not go after the murderous and corrupt government that was oppressing people and involved in ethnic clensing? Many other nations supported the US going in then. All I wonder is what the difference is now.

    (Posted without Karma Bonus as this, well, is off topic)

  88. Mandrake 9.1- a bomb by joestar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tested the latest state of Cooker (which is the 9.1 pre-final), and it's incredibly good. They have:
    - a completely new and redesigned (and simplified) installation procedure, never saw something so efficient and fast
    - a completely redesigned desktop in GNOME & KDE (it's called MandrakeGalaxy and has *great* new icons...)
    - anti-aliased fonts everywhere, this provides a great comfort of use...

    There are also cool features such as NTFS partition resizing, WiFi support and others.

    And the best of all is that for 10 days they seem to be only focusing on intensive debuging and frankly it's hard to find any bug left in this distribution!

    My feeling is that MDK 9.1 is going to be a real bomb in the Linux world - it's so full featured, easy to use, powerful... I would call it "Ultimate"!

    1. Re:Mandrake 9.1- a bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And the best of all is that for 10 days they seem to be only focusing on intensive debuging and frankly it's hard to find any bug left in this distribution!

      Lol, 10 days for bug freeness? You know how stupid you sound?

    2. Re:Mandrake 9.1- a bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamn fanboy. Does the word "objectivity" mean anything at all to you? You sound like a technically clueless advertising copywriter.

  89. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever sit back and actually read what's going on? It's the UN cafeteria that renamed their fries, not the whole Nation.

    The new article mentions a proposal to boycott french products. Buying wine and dumping it in the sewers is the civilian way of showing french disapproval.

    Statue of Liberty,? How bout landing at Normandy, defending french freedom, losing lives on french soil, spending billions of dollars in reconstruction, etc. The British Daily Mail said it best, "monstrous ingratitude".

    If you think about it. The UN council has became the grounds where nations try to opt for more power and control. And it seems that a few nations have taken this opportunity to go for their chance for power. The US is upset b/c this is at a time where we ask for help and we see our allies acting on a power trip.

    Why is the US so powerful? Could be b/c every conflict around the world asks for US intervention. Once something goes wrong, countrymen start spouting out rediculous nonsense.

    The US has learned during the World Wars that we cannot afford to sit back and watch the world solve its own problems. And as the world's only superpower, we no longer have that option.

    The US has helped both France and Germany, during and after the world wars. It just seems now that old egos are starting to flare.

    Probably a lot of US presidents saw this coming, GWB is the only one nutty enough to stir up the hornets nest.

    K, turning off my rant engine.

  90. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by k8to · · Score: 1

    Yes yes!

    Also the Linux Kernel itself has all kinds of horrible FURRINERS behind it! Major contributions to the SCSI layer, the VM, and so on have been contributed by engineers from France, Germany.

    Clearly you should dump the whole arab-loving operating system! It logically follows doesn't it?

    --
    -josh
  91. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Patoski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the US want European support, they'll have to offer some evidence that is not faked (admitted by the US prime minister) or bought (23 million $$$ to a Taliban defector!)

    We *know* Saddam had tons of chemical weapons and other weapons of mass destruction so what happened to them? The burden of proof isn't on the inspectors to *prove* Iraq has weapons. It is Iraq's job to show the inspectors documentation that proves that they destroyed their weapons of mass destruction. If we were to go by the South African model of disarmament (which most in the UN agree is an almost perfect model) the inspectors are basically auditors. Now I work for a fortune 500 company and let me explain how audits work. Auditors come in a request information. We provide the information and any backup to that info that they request. If we don't provide the requested documentation and backup we'd be in very hot water very quickly.

    Auditing is not an easter egg hunt like these inspections appear to be. Blix has said that Iraq's documentation is insufficient. Iraq has had weapons of mass destruction in the past. What happened to them?! No one knows and Iraq won't/can't provide credible evidence/documentation that they've destroyed these weapons. So we're just to assume that Saddam has been a nice little boy and has gotten rid of them? Iraq is not actively complying with the inspectors and only letting inspectors look around. Guess what... they aren't going to find anything in a state the size of California. Its just too easy to hide things in a land of this size. There will *never* be anything close to the disarmament of Iraq without the active participation of Saddam as long as he is in power. You simply cannot expect him to give up these powerful weapons willingly. He has thumbed his nose at UN resolutions and inspections for 11 years. What makes you think he will suddenly see the light and disarm willingly? Assuming Saddam will do anything but delay and hinder disarmament attempts is pure fantasy.

    --
    G. Washington on Government "it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
  92. Fun with SuSE by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Do what I do. I buy the "Personal" version, so SuSE gets a little $ back, and I install everything else that I need from either a)the source or b)SuSE Pro RPMs from ftp.suse.com.

    I've been using SuSE Pro releases but 8.1 really started to annoy me by insisting that I install a bunch of stuff I didn't want or risk "system inconsistancies." Damn it, if I wanted KDE w/o CUPS, let me. Geez!

    However, I've taken a liking to Gentoo these days.

    1. Re:Fun with SuSE by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      For $10 more you can get the Pro Upgrade version. I did that with 8.1 and it came with the admin manual, which IIRC you don't get with Personal, but without the "clueless newbie" manuals you get with either full version (which just gather dust on my shelf until I get around to throwing them away). It's something to look into if you care, otherwise, carry on.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  93. Re:All this talk of "screenshots", "How it looks". by bmetzler · · Score: 1
    You can make Slackware 3.x look just as cool if you compile KDE 3.1 and a few themes/backgrounds.

    I'd rather pay someone $40 to do that for me.

    -Brent
  94. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen in the news how you US Americans are boycotting french products.

    My beaugolais last nite was great.

    Renaming French Fries to Freedom Fries. That's by far the most stupid thing I EVER heard.

    We in the US have a saying that translates like this: "No shit Captain Obvious.".

    These pictures looked EXACTLY like the pictures of arabs burning a US flag - except there's no flag involved.

    And nothing is being burned.

    And one last thing: Don't forget that the Statue of Liberty is a present from france. Burn it down.

    How about this, we'll burn down the Lady Liberty -iff- the French burn down their Little Lady Liberty.

    take a breath man.

  95. Oh no!! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Damn! I just purchased a copy of 8.1 last night on ebay!
    I tried to install it on top of my Mandrake 9.0 (w/KDE 3.1) from the friggin 5.5gig glob I downloaded. It did NOT like it when I tried to mount my 120gig data drive (hdb5 - /home)

    It looked and worked GREAT until I mounted my data drive.
    I assume it was polluted with old MDK 8.2 and 9.0 files and the permissions and ownerships just freaked it out.

    It KP'ed like a fool every few minutes once I mounted the big drive, but before that it looked and worked GREAT!!

    It even installed the drivers for my GF4 4200 card with a single click.

    Well, when I get the 8.1 disks in I'll BACK UP my data and nuke the drive so that it's all nice and clean. Then I'll just update from 8.1 to 8.2 over ftp.

    Gotta love that broadband!!

  96. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Surreal_Streaker · · Score: 1
    Germany, France and the rest of Europe do not support Bin Laden or Saddam...

    No, but Saddam supports France and Germany and Russia with oil. At least we now know how much their souls cost.

    Doesn't it strike you as a bit ironic that 50 years after the US and Britain liberated France and Germany (... and then left...) these countries are using that freedom to force their opinion down the throats of the rest of Europe and the prospective EU.
    Imagine celebrating the gift of freedom by saying that the Kurds and Iraqis do not deserve to be freed from an oppressive dictator.

    There are many good reasons to oppose war. It is ludicrous, however given the current balance of world power for France (especially) to think that they can leverage their position in the UN to stop the US from protecting itself. The reality of the situation is that the UN is worthless without the US, and is worthless to the US if it is not able to provide for American security.

    It is inconceivable that France is willing to risk their relevance in the New World Order and the relevance of the UN for a couple of dollars. I'm sure that they would feel a bit differently if they had enough stature in world politics to be worthy of attack.

  97. Funny, this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see that you guys don't just hate Microsoft and it's fans. You also hate each other (at least others that don't use your distro, desktop, desktop version, kernal version, GCC version, scripting language, etc., etc.).

    This is one reason why Linux has such a hard time breaking into the mainstream. It's backers can't even agree.

    Imagine people arguing over which service pack in Windows 2000 was better for this or that. Or hey! All of us l33t people use win-write! Notepad users sUx0rs.

  98. Long string of curses... by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
    This HAD to happen. I just got Slack 9 up and running with my core software, then they go and do this. I JUST got the last tidbits installed last night!

    Bastards.

    --

    There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

  99. FTP download is free and easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only pay for SuSE about once every four releases. It's trivially easy to FTP the whole shebang, plop it down onto an FTP, Samba or HTTP server and then do an over-the-network install from your own server and you even get three different flavors of network protocol to choose from. I got 8.1 by using the simple drag & drop WS-FTP32 to grab the whole tree from off of ibiblio's superfast mirror, plopped it onto my Windows XP workstation that has tons of free disk space, shares the folder over my network and did a samba-based network install from the boot iso cdrom to four different machines simultaneously. Much faster than cdroms.

  100. Who cares? You can't redistribute it anyway. by bogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right? If I can't download the code, make ANY modifications I want and then redistribute it in ISO or other form what the hell good is it? That's not linux, that's some proprietary bullshit hassle.

    Suse may make contributions but the their software is Non-Free or "free as in beer" only. Thus in my mind their the same as Lindows, Xandros et al.

    Too many strings make Suse worthless to me and its why I'll never use it. That's also why it will never fit the definition of truly free software.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Who cares? You can't redistribute it anyway. by Daemonik · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you smoking? Other than YaST and perhaps a few other proprietary apps SuSE is as free as any other commercial Linux. The sources are available for download at the same time the rest of the distro is put out on their FTP servers, if that's not fast enough for you they're also included on the DVD/CD sets that SuSE sells. Recompile and distribute to your hearts content.

      Better, use Debian ya deadbeat and stop raggin on people that like to make a few bucks off of their hard work.

  101. Re:Anyone notice.. by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

    Hey...

    Maybe the bits about mp3s and automagically detecting/configuring/displaying on desktop your usb hardware when you plug it in weren't enough? Dunno.

    But I dont' know how you got the impression that the sales people were in awe or anything, one of THEM was the one who made a big deal that they had to go back to gdm to shutdown. Go figure.

  102. Re:MMMMM andrake (-: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    final is due out next week, also with KDE 3.1 and other goodies. Free to download

    I've heard the free download will only be available once the boxed sets hit the stores. Given how long it's taken in the past, it could be a fairly significant delay. I'm more hopeful for Ark Linux, which is a non comercial desktop linux distro. I can both not pay for it, and not feel guilty!

  103. Re:Shut up, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? Without the Germans, you wouldn't have been able to fly to the moon. And if you buy gay porn from the French, that's your problem.

    Now go back and shovel in some more of those hamburgers, fatty. (Uneducated American trying to cover up from your bloated, ugly, 2-ton women)

  104. Re:Now really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Kshu" Wow! Finally I can use decent, stable softwa.. wait a minute. Green?!! GREEN!!!! Fuck that!

    SuSE 8... is PEOPLE!!

  105. Hate to point out the obvious... by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

    ...a new administration tool called "Desktop sharing" that allows remote control of other desktops

    Yeah, the rest of the world has that already. It's called VNC.

  106. Re:Anyone notice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Even your sales reps were amazed when I showed them my SuSE box with it's shutdown screen. What was your reasoning for this?"


    You don't say the word "awe", but you do use "amazed", which still leaves me with the same impression. I still feel that this is NOT that big of a deal.. I'm sure Redhat will fix it in 8.1

    I respect their decision to not include mp3 libs, just as I respect their decision to not support Nvidia drivers because they aren't open source and they can't guarantee their customers ANYTHING if they don't have access to the source. They didn't decide to not include them because they want to piss everyone off, they are doing it because they are a responsible company that supports Free software.

    Auto desktop configuration is the only thing in your post that was neutral and interesting, and you hardly talk about it. Most of your rant was about Redhat's lack of mp3 software and lack of a shutdown option in KDE.

  107. Re:SuSE is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irony. Like Goldy and Silvery, except made from iron.

  108. Well I guess you have more money to spend... by Ghengis · · Score: 1

    frivolously than do I.

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

    1. Re:Well I guess you have more money to spend... by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      frivolously than do I.

      Or more billable work, I suppose. Seeing as I can bill $50 an hour for doing Linux system administration, it really doesn't pay to stop that for 4 hours (or probably much, much longer) to compile the latest linux stuff, when a company has already done that for me for only $40.

      -Brent
  109. Outlook for ten years? by hungfarlow · · Score: 1

    That virus fly-paper has been around for 10 years? I didn't realize that it was available for BlowMe 3.1

    --
    Penguins are so sensitive to my needs - Lyle Lovett
  110. I SUSE by hungfarlow · · Score: 1

    Wow - you get to use Linux at work? Lucky you! (Seriously) I used Redhat a couple years ago and switched to SUSE because I can get everything and the kitchen sink on the CDs/DVD. I live behaind a modem and this is really important to me. $40 a year to upgarde is no big deal. Also - only Redhat could figure out how to get xfig to NOT save drawings as eps.(LaTeX rules!)

    --
    Penguins are so sensitive to my needs - Lyle Lovett
  111. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by hungfarlow · · Score: 1

    "The dubmest farmers harvest the biggest potatoes" Whay are you looking at my potato? Even if I have the biggest potato, what is dubmest? Some type of goo left over from a rave? (P.S. I have visited Germany and it rocks. Very beautiful and historical.)

    --
    Penguins are so sensitive to my needs - Lyle Lovett
  112. SuSE install via web by 'Aikanaka · · Score: 1
    From the SuSE website:

    "SuSE offers the possibility to install SuSE Linux free of charge directly from the FTP server. The function scope of FTP versions is virtually the same as that of the "normal" version. Merely a few program packages have been excluded due to license reasons. The installation support is not included either."

    This works for releases back to the 7 series. Download/create the boot disk and module disks. With 8.1, and most likely 8.2, you can download a boot ISO (which includes all of the module disks). Using either the floppy or the ISO, you can install SuSE via the Internet using ftp or NFS.

    See these links for details:

    Also, I've been using SuSE since 6.2 and like it's ease-of-use. Updates can be managed using their YaST program. You can even test-drive new versions by booting their Live-Eval CDs! Kinda fun way to freak out your co-workers by changing their Windoze box to Linux while they're out to lunch ;) No side-effects or lasting changes either...perfectly safe.

    Anyways, just my $0.02!

    `Aikanaka...

  113. Re:All this talk of "screenshots", "How it looks". by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    People, the look of the window manager is a product of the window manager, NOT the distro. The text looks good be cause they use truetype fonts. The colors are cool because someone created themes/images that look that way. All the Distro has done is slapped all this stuff together, added a few programs to make things easier to config and install for the newbs, and said, "Pay us 40 dollars for selling you something that is MOSTLY someone else's work!"

    Except in this case the distro actually employs and pays a significant portion of the window manager's core development team. In fact, at one point SuSE employed more Linux developers than any other distro (over 500, IIRC), so I would hardly say that they are making money off of someone else's work. In fact, I might say that Linux wouldn't be anywhere near where it is today if SuSE didn't use a business model that actually makes money.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  114. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like your post because I know there is a lot of truth in it. I am kind of in between al chairs. I am german/turkish married to an american/chinese living in France.

    I know with the propper proff the NATO would follow to war w/o hesitation.

    Also the finger pointing all over the place is distastefull. The ... "We freed the french, they ought to follow us where ever it suits us, otherwise they are good only to surrender" ... Crap ... as well as the other netiquetes brought forward by americas DIPLOMATS are as out of order as Chiraques remarques to the EU newcommer to shut up.

    Why in times of information technologies can't we keep it as close to a factual based discussion as possible ? That is what I believe diplomats are for.

    Also I hope that some one kicks Sharon and Arafat to be sitting down together and start talking. Obviously the "I kill you because you kill my people" thing is no good.

    As for the threat to America ... What about N Korea ? NOW is the timt to talk. Don't wait untill bombs are dropping.

    As I said before I am married. I KNOW to keep up the relationship and peace you have to be willing to compromise. After all I am stronger then my wife and we have some fights but I have never hit/shut/kicked her just because that is a way of shutting her up.

    Ouch this is way off topic ... Sorry, just what's on every one's mind.
    Ps. I did not mention that I hate Saddam and IMHO he should be removed. But dropping some MOAB (Mother Of All Bombs) kill usually more bystanders.

    Peace .

  115. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful? WTF are the mods on today? This has to be the most blatent American bashing and generalization of the American people I have seen in my fucking life.

  116. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When talking about this one of my friends had a suggestion :

    "Why don't you go and change the country names in the headline of the news."

    Change for example America with Russia, Iraq with Saud Arabia, and France with Britain. Imagine Russia would like to rid Saudi Arabia of the house of Saud because a lot of the money for Mr Bin Laden came from this country. What would the states say to this then ? There would be no discussion what so ever in the NATO. the war would not happen !

    So please think about that for a while.

    Ps. On a funny not : If you change US with Iraq and Bush with Saddam, you have the same stand-off. Weapons of Mass destruction, no weapons inspectors allowed or welcome, dictatorship (kinda), No mercy to people other then your own etc.

  117. Re:Shut up, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's kick this worthless American's butt!

    BOYS, GET YOUR SS UNIFORMS!

  118. Re:Anyone notice.. by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1


    Auto desktop configuration is awesome, and yes, I didn't talk much about it. It takes work to do.

    Fixing KDE and including MP3 codecs takes virtually no work, and would move RH to being more "complete", IMO.

  119. KOrganizer Exchange Plugin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone used the KOrganizer Exchange Plug-in? From this page it appears to need Outlook Web Access activated, saying it needs WebDAV to work. I'm curious if it can do all the features of Outlook/Exchange calendaring, like notification of conflicts, handling of "resources" as well as normal contacts, etc.

  120. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    OK, Moderators.... HOW IS THE PARENT NOT A TROLL? Maybe I'm missing something(scratching head)

  121. Install via FTP by ElJosho · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I'm running SuSE 8.1 on three machines right now - my home system, my laptop, and my work PC. I am still learning Linux, but I have tried quite a few distros and the lack of ISO images for SuSE dosen't bother me. Why? Because the FTP install is bulletproof! All I've ever needed to install SuSE on anything was three floppies and the IP of a local mirror.

    Sure, it takes hours, but just check off the packages you want, light fuse and get away! Set it before you go to bed, it's done in the morning (at least on cable/T1) - no swapping discs or anything like that. If you're looking to install onto multiple PCs, just mirror the distro locally. It's no bigger than a few ISOs would be. SuSE is also the ONLY distro I've gotten to install via FTP - most others made it so difficult that I had to download the ISOs.

    Just my experience, your milage may vary.

  122. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you shut the fuck up, homo? This isn't WWII.

  123. All you guys are a bunch of sissies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make an LFS if you're a true geek. Otherwise, stick with SuSE, Redhat, Windows XP, Mandrake, or whatever, and discuss until you retire about which is better.

  124. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

    Ps. On a funny not : If you change US with Iraq and Bush with Saddam, you have the same stand-off. Weapons of Mass destruction, no weapons inspectors allowed or welcome, dictatorship (kinda), No mercy to people other then your own etc.

    Okay, I call bullshit here. First of all, Iraq agreed to rid itself of WMD as a result of the cease fire of the first Gulf War. It's not as they were coerced into it, Saddam agreed to it so as to not be deposed.

    Secondly, the US (contrary to popular Slashdot drone belief) is NOT a dictatorship. The government and society is a reaction to the 8 years under Clinton where anyone could do just about anything and get away with it. Sure, there are laws that Americans do not agree with, and there are not enough Senators that listen to their constituants, but that does not mean that the citizens don't have a say in their government. If the people really cared and weren't acting like dumb sheep, they could look up where canidates get their money from and use that as their voting criterion. The could ask for more debates and the parties involved would agree to them. The problem is not that the US is turning authoritarian, the problem is that many people don't care about their government at all.

    I hate to break it to you, Mr. AC, but the US gives a lot of aid to a lot of people. Where do you think most of the World Bank loans come from? Where does much of the money given for African AIDS come from, and other bailout loans? Where has Russia gotten many of its loans? You guessed it, the United States. Opressing people that are different from the WASP majority hasn't happend on a full scale for many years, and every time it happened, our society took note and realized it was wrong.

    Now, I am not saying that American government is benevolant, far from it, but one of the things that is great about American society is the right to peaceful dissent. For example, if you have the proper permits, don't break windows or destroy property, don't harm other people, and don't start a riot, you are more than welcome to march in any city that you wish. Note, your protest must be non-violent, and you are protected. The moment that two drunken assholes start pounding on each other or one of your more violent protesters throws a brick through a window, and the government has every right to start arresting those involved for disturbing the peace. You broke your end, and they're protecting citizens that don't agree with you.

    Yes, this is STILL off topic, but I can't let a person that's too cowardly to post under their username run off and troll.

  125. Re:BOYCOTT SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ps. I did not mention that I hate Saddam and IMHO he should be removed. But dropping some MOAB (Mother Of All Bombs) kill usually more bystanders.

    The MOAB is most likely psych-ops, and anyone using it to destroy one building in Baghdad in the middle of a residential area is just BEGGING for collateral damage.

  126. Re:Those looking for a fresh Linux desktop distro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just finished buring the isos, and plan on giving it a try this weekend. I have to say, I'm really excited over their ideas and direction. I've been somewhat torn over my desire to see a community supported desktop distro, and my desire to see the existing comercial ones get some money. It always feels a bit weird telling people looking for a free alternitive to windows that the best canidates for their move are only 'kinda' free. As well, I too was happy to see apt in there. As cool as apt4rpm is, I just don't see it used very much, with the desktop distros all having their own different tools. This, and some other reuse makes me think their philosophy of not reinventing the wheel could make for a very nice collection that reflects what's going on in the comunity.

    Plus, I really like the idea of being able to get into working with a distro this early on. It's a neat idea to think that building some rpms, or putting together some simple configuration utilities for the distro could actually be a pretty big contribution.

  127. SUSE 8.1 record holder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suse 8.1 (installed by FTP) holds my personal record for shortest use of Linux. It lasted 2 hours after install.

    1. Made installing my vid card and monitor a nightmare.
    2. Looked like crap compared to the default install of redhat phoebe #3.

  128. Me too.. by sawanv · · Score: 1

    *cough cough* Gentoo anyone?

  129. Not as stupid as it sounds starting from stability by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    10 days for bug freeness?

    First off, he didn't say bug-free, he said bug-fixing (typical careless AC, dare you to step forward and be content-policed!), second off, Mandrake and the Cooker crew are only clobbering obvious bugs (as in, cause crashes or don't work) not trivial stuff or non-present features.

    Having said that, they've already contributed quite a few new features to various projects in the last month or so since the list exploded (think circa 1000 messages a day) in the ramp-up to release.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  130. Mandrake DIDN'T file for bankruptcy... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...they filed for Bankruptcy Protection, which is quite a different thing, and for which there seems to be no US equivalent.

    Mandrake are (and have been) making a profit for some time, now, and have chewed through most of their .COM-days debts, the protection was basically to give their creditors legal excuse to get off their backs (ie not foreclose) for six months while they put a big enough dent in those debts to survive. And so far, they are.

    I'm looking forward to them getting the financial monkey off their collective back, because then they can re-hire some more developers and get on with pushing along important Linux-centric projects like KDE. Mandrake have so far GPLed everything that goes into their distros, and yet they're making a profit right now.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  131. enterprise culture by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    such decisions are part of the global orientation and general culture of the enterprises.

    That might explain why SuSE don't GPL as much stuff as Mandrake, and why Mandrake's download edition has always been available before shop stock. To compensate, they opened MandrakeClub - where's the SuSE equivalent, or indeed the need for one? I note that Mandrake didn't join the apparently-ill-fated United Linux cabal. From all this you can learn that their corporate culture is less grasping, and also less conservative. Whether that latter is a boon or a bummer depends on your viewpoint.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:enterprise culture by dago · · Score: 1

      Yep. Exactly. Except that the result of these choices won't depends on my viewpoint, but on what's in their account at the end of the year (for Mandrake, in July).

      BTW, generalities apart, SuSE is german and Mandrake is french ... one can also wonder wether (or how far) the entreprises culture correlates on the general country culture ???
      (and no, this is not flamebait !)

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  132. eDonkey and why you should pay for SuSE by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    why should we pay SuSE just because they don't?

    Because it's easier to install and supports more hardware than RedHat (and they don't charge for updates), but more stable than Mandrake. Because you don't want to fart around with day-long compiles to get your machine working (Gentoo, Sourcerer) and don't care that much about squeezing 10% more horsepower out of it. Because it uses RPMs (although Mandrake's URPMI is nearly as good as Debian's apt-get on that score, and RPMs might be an anti-feature for a Debianite or Slackie). Because you ist ein Deutschlander, and their German support is pretty good (like Mandrake's French support). Because you don't want a US-and-allies-centric distro. I'm sure there's scores more reasons.

    Mandrake know about eDonkey and warez meets, that's what MandrakeClub is for. Debian know and don't care because they're not a sales-supported organisation. RedHat and Slackware seem to get by. Caldera don't know what hit them, and LindowsOS is a bloody circus. And Yoper are mana-whoring (-: no, just kidding, mana doesn't work like karma :-).

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  133. SuSE needs to be given a try by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    Sounds like SuSE needs to be given a try.

    Agree. And I don't even use it. (-:

    Download and try Mandrake 9.1 next week as well.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  134. Show me the data by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    Where's the compasrison?

    Go read your LUG's list archives. If your LUG's not big enough to draw data points from, go find a few others.

    Knoppix is unbeatable for auto-detecting stuff, and ironically they got the code for doing that out of a Mandrake installer. Mandrake seems to be just ahead of SuSE but it seems to vary lots. SuSE seems to be better at video cards, for example, not so good at scanners, printers and other peripherals. RedHat, it goes without saying, lags both but with one or two exceptions for stuff like specific video card drivers.

    I could say that Debian's hardware detection sucks, but Knoppix is Debian-based: you can boot it, play with it, then install it and just apt-get from the standard Debian trees if you want any extras.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  135. Reports of death exaggerated by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    it does seem as if Mandrake is in trouble

    True, but not as much trouble as `bankruptcy protection' suggests; what they are in is a kind of pre-bankruptcy for which the USA appears to have no equivalent. It is not Chapter 11. The idea is to continue the company as a going concern (stop creditors foreclosing), the French gummint has approved their plan, they seem to be full steam ahead for financial bliss later this year.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  136. Re:steering AWAY from the xenophobic right wing nu by CentrX · · Score: 1

    Where are the ISOs though?

    --

    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  137. Re:Changes in the EU, end of rotating presidency.. by Herkules · · Score: 0

    "end of rotating presidency.."

    Well this is do to the fact with the 8-10 new members EU will be some 23 Conutries. When EU hits that size it will take 6 months * 23 months before the presidency returns again witch is 11.5 years!

    Do you see the problem ??

    It will just not be workable! And all member countries knows this.

    "unless the current leaders and the US figure out a solution."

    I am sorry but Europe dose not need to be saved from France and Germany.

    "The European news that I've seen is like the NPR crap in this country, a bunch of left wing nuts taking federal money to talk down to people and feel all enlightened about it."

    Maybe thats becous most of Europe leans to the left =)

    (People to the left == media to the left) Simpel isent it!

    --
    CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
  138. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    No part of this message may reproduce, store itself in a retrieval system,
    or transmit disease, in any form, without the permissiveness of the author.
    -- Chris Shaw

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...