Slashdot Mirror


AMD: No Grease For You!

bahamat writes "In a surprising turn of events, this article over at Xtreme Tek explains that the official stance from AMD is that you will void your warranty if you use any thermal grease or if you're not using the heatsink provided with your CPU. Sucks to be you if you buy a defective AMD CPU and put a Zalman on it for the first boot." AMD, the article says, doesn't want you to use anything "other than Shin Estu G 749."

551 comments

  1. Dictators by Loosewire · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hate when companies get too big for their boots and turn into dictatorships like this :-(

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
    1. Re:Dictators by Loosewire · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Firstly well done for spotting im british - maybe you read my other posts and cheated.
      Secondly its the fact of big companies being jerks. Dell with their propriatory power supplies,disney dvd unskippable ads, tv channels with more logos across the screen than programming content. The list goes on da da dume da dume....

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
    2. Re:Dictators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, we say "too big for their britches".

    3. Re:Dictators by TheYoungPunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh really. If you were AMD and you were trying to compete against Intel, what the heck would you do? You don't have time to worry about that stuff right now, and besides, who the heck cares. Ever since I have been using AMD (2 years ago) with my Duron 650 Spitefire (codename) I have never had a problem with overheating. Now I run an original Socket A Athlon (thunderbird) 1400, Not a problem. Yes, AMD should build heatsinks into their processors, however they currently don't and you can do anything about it. And by the way, after reading half of the replies, I get sick of hearing about how loud the stock fan, SO WHAT, just replace it. The chances of your processor overheating (if you install it right and DON'T OVERCLOCK) are so low, it's not even funny. And oh yeah, for those of you who say that the core crushes in really easily, sure it does, if you take a sledgehammer to it ;)

    4. Re:Dictators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "too cocky for their codpiece"? No one says that.

    5. Re:Dictators by The+Dobber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I fail to see your point. If a company provides a warrenty on one of thier products, they are well within thier rights to provide "groundrules" for the use and application of thier product.

      Lets say I amble over to the local Toyota deal and buy myself a shiny new Tacoma pickup. I want to supercharge it. Toyota states that the only supercharger which may be used without voiding the warrenty is the TRD approved unit. I put on an ACME one I got off eBay. Should Toyota honor thier warrenty when the engine goes !!BOOM!!.

    6. Re:Dictators by bgog · · Score: 1

      While I disagree with this poster, exactly why was this moderated 'Offtopic'. He expressed and option about the topic. Even if it isn't very well informed it IS on topic. Now this post on the other hand. Is offtopic.

    7. Re:Dictators by LamerX · · Score: 1

      I agree. But, AMD has released new heatsyncs that are SOOO quiet! I just got a batch in, and it is really amazing how quiet these babys are. All they did was lift the fan up off the heat sync about 1/4 inch. It really is nice.

    8. Re:Dictators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the ACME supercharger at a minimum meets the same engineering specs as the TRD approved unit. Then Toyota may very well be legally obliged to honour their warranty regardless of their written warranty limitation.

      Consumer protection laws allow the stipulation of specifications, not brands, models or arbitary approval processes.

      As always it depends on your local laws. The manufacturer must put up, or leave.

    9. Re:Dictators by V.P. · · Score: 1

      The .uk web site is a dead giveaway.

    10. Re:Dictators by October_30th · · Score: 1
      I get sick of hearing about how loud the stock fan, SO WHAT, just replace it

      Quite frankly, any fan that has to cope with AMD's or Intel's high range ix86 CPUs is bound to be too loud. Even the huge 80 mm fan in this heatsink/fan combo make too much noise to keep the computer on at night.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    11. Re:Dictators by Loosewire · · Score: 1

      ok but i posted that at 3am, now i feel stupid :-(

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
    12. Re:Dictators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i only wish i had more mod points so i could give you the -1 hat trick old chap

    13. Re:Dictators by shtarker · · Score: 1

      The sadest thing about that example, is that Toyota would be likley to have thier pants sued off in an incident like that.

    14. Re:Dictators by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      not really - I actually thought about supercharging my engine so I asked the dealer about it and my warrenty - and the dealer showed me in the paperwork where it says it is not resposible for any damage caused that can be directly related to something I had installed as a performance upgrade.

    15. Re:Dictators by stanmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Toyota may be legally obligated to prove that the aftermarket -charger broke the engine, but that is their only legal obligation. For example... If you install that supercharger, and a warranty covered part of the air conditioning system goes, they will have to fix it, ditto for anything that cannot be proved was affected by an aftermarket/out of spec part.

      Personal example:
      Lost my fuel cap. Replaced with an aftermarket... the aftermarket didn't seal the system to spec. My warranty is still good, however, I had to pay out of pocket for the computer to be reset.

      Lost the cap again... yes I lose rather a few.
      This time I got one from the dealer... same defect, but this time, full warranty coverage...

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    16. Re:Dictators by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy. SEMA (Specialty Equipment Manufacturers Association) has been very effective at lobbying to make sure that legislation protects automobile consumers such that if an automaker feels that a modification made by the owner is the reason for damage they must PROVE that. This is not to say that the local dealer may not attempt to dismiss the request for warranty work by pointing to said modification - but the consumer has rights and can challenge this if they are willing to do the work (which typically isn't much more than calling the regional support line and indicating a knowledge of the real law and an awareness of consumer rights). Mounting a supercharger is a very common practice. Now if it is mounted by a moron and exceeds advisable boost pressures for that motor and the bottom-end suffers damage, that's pretty easy to prove. If, however, there's a defect with the motor like a leaking head gasket Toyota is obligated to replace/repair that condition (assuming the warranty covers that). That said - this really isn't such a big deal as far as it's impact to AMD consumers. The subject really is limited to boxed CPU's as who really buys boxed CPU's (extra cost vs. OEM CPU's), removes the supplied fan and heat sink to install their own (even more cost). The removal of the supplied heat sink and fan has already voided the boxed CPU warranty so who cares whether there's Artic Silver there or not? The overwhelming majority (no facts to back this up, just my gut feeling) of people I would guess use AMD CPU's and Artic Silver are probably buying OEM CPU's. Since OEM CPU's aren't warrantied to the consumer by AMD the fact that Artic Silver (or similar) voids the warranty is moot - any return is going to be back to the retailer, who typically gives a 1 week-ish warranty on OEM CPU's. IF - and this is a mighty big IF - retailers suddenly start attaching this warranty disclaimer to their OEM CPU's because AMD has published this, then there could be an impact. Given the nature of the retailer (and, for CPU's, predominantly mail-order) business for OEM'd computer fixin's (CPU's, mboards, etc.) I'd have a hard time seeing how the retailer could be successful with such a policy, though. So - while on the face of it the warranty disclaimer sure looks dumb, I really think it is much ado about nothing.

      --
      "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
    17. Re:Dictators by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Look at it from AMD's point of view.

      I'm going to pull numbers out of my ass, so watch out, but you'll get the concept.

      Let's suppose 1 out of 20 people who buy an AMD computer overclock (it's probably a lot, lot less than that). Now suppose that 95% of the "defective returns" show evidence of someone overclocking.

      Now what are you going to do if you're AMD? Each return costs you the profits on, say, 50 sold chips. Simple and obvious: any chips that were obviously overclocked will have a voided warranty and will not be returned.

      That's entirely reasonable.

      If it were only that easy for The Gap to tell when women wore this or that outfit to a wedding or dance or something and then returned it.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  2. Two words... by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rubbing alcohol! They'll never know.

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    1. Re:Two words... by skroz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, they could very easily know. All they have to do is put some kind of alcohol-soluble, UV ink mark on the chip. It doesn't even have to be visible in UV... that's just if they want to be sneaky about it.

      --
      -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    2. Re:Two words... by MisterKoffee · · Score: 3, Funny
      Rubbing alcohol! They'll never know.

      Of course then they'll nail you for not using any thermal compound at all...

      --
      ...a market economy is the only way that you sustain a high enough average level of wealth that we can afford to be arti
    3. Re:Two words... by alexburke · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rubbing alcohol! They'll never know.

      No, try again. Ever tried getting Arctic Silver (or el-cheapo white thermal paste) off a CPU with isopropanol and a Q-Tip? You won't get all of it off.

      So what is the secret sauce you need to soak that Q-Tip in, you ask? Acetone. Gone without a trace every time!

    4. Re:Two words... by meowsqueak · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. I tried the isopropyl alcohol when trying to remove that pink wax pad thing (PCM?) from a heatsink - completely useless...

      but acetone... wow, what great stuff!! It cuts through everything. Great stuff. I'll never be without my tin of acetone again.

    5. Re:Two words... by Wolfier · · Score: 2, Informative

      Acetone = good call :)

      One easy way to obtain acetone is from nail polish removers.

    6. Re:Two words... by alexburke · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. I tried the isopropyl alcohol when trying to remove that pink wax pad thing (PCM?) from a heatsink - completely useless... but acetone... wow, what great stuff!! It cuts through everything. Great stuff. I'll never be without my tin of acetone again.

      Yes, it cuts through everything, including most plastics. Don't get it anywhere near anything plastic that you value. It dissolves it (or frosts the surface of it, depending on the type of plastic) on contact.

    7. Re:Two words... by alienw · · Score: 1, Informative

      Great idea. If you want to dissolve half of the CPU package, that is. DON'T USE ACETONE ON ANYTHING THAT REMOTELY RESEMBLES PLASTIC, including CPUs.

    8. Re:Two words... by meowsqueak · · Score: 1

      how ironic that you should mention this - I just posted a comment about the exact same thing - acetone + credit card... :(

    9. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, what's the bottle made of that holds it?

    10. Re:Two words... by alienw · · Score: 1

      The acetone I have is in a metal can. I think you might be confusing acetone with something else. Acetone dissolves damn near every plastic; it's used as a paint remover and to clean brushes and stuff. I sure as hell wouldn't put it in a plastic bottle.

    11. Re:Two words... by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 1

      Try cooking oil. It worked for me, and it's safe enough to eat. Furthermore, it doesn't dry up your hands or have inhalation warnings.

      -Paul Komarek

    12. Re:Two words... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " Actually, they could very easily know. All they have to do is put some kind of alcohol-soluble, UV ink mark on the chip. It doesn't even have to be visible in UV... that's just if they want to be sneaky about it."

      And when they say you cleaned off your artic silver you tell them you used the alcohol to clean of the approved grease so the chip was nice and clean for them.

    13. Re:Two words... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      "Gone without a trace every time!"

      That would have been a great line if removed the traces on the cpu. Sadly it won't. I know you weren't imnplying it would. But it was just so close to being a great line. Damn chemistry

    14. Re:Two words... by floodo1 · · Score: 0

      the chemical that EVERYONE forgets that is actually the best all around solvent is not rubbing alcohaul but........

      DENATURED alcohaul.

      cleans damn near as good as acetone but does NOT go around attacking and destroying everything delecate. puts rubbing alcohol to shame, and isnt a god damn oil!

      seriously this stuff cant be beat!

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    15. Re:Two words... by skroz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a pair of scissors that I used to use to cut open boxes, cut tape, etc.. One day I descided to strip all of the excess glue off of them, and used a reagent bottle of acetone that some one in my lab had lifted from the chem department. Unfortunately for me, I managed to slice open my hand with the scissors while pouring acetone over the blades. Let me explain to you what pain REALLY is...

      Another side effect... acetone in that concentration will suck the moisture right out of your skin. Even a single tiny drop will leave a white, dried spot on your flesh.

      --
      -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    16. Re:Two words... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Phase change pads generally leave little or no residue.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Two words... by scotch · · Score: 1

      It's also used to clean PVC before forming joints. It does this cleaning by dissolving everything on the pipe including dirt, ink labels, price tags, and it would appear even a bit of the pipe iteslf.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    18. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glass?

    19. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe all of you are talking about different "acetones". You are referring to the paint removal acetate... the original poster was referring to the nail polish remover "acetone". The "common" acetone comes in plastic bottles, and those of you with a girlfriend or woman in your lives (if she does make up) will have easy access to one of such bottles.

      Cheers!

    20. Re:Two words... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Well whoo needs Acetone then! how about a pure vat of hydrocloric acid, stored in glass of course!
      Then you could say 'gone without a trace -- every time!' since only the glasses (silicon/ceramic) would be immune to the pure HCL.

    21. Re:Two words... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      in reality they don't care, unless you spoofed up the arctic silver/whatever on the bridges on the cpu..

      like, come on, where would you find this 'approved' stuff anyways? or thermal pads when you needed them(that you could buy 1 at a time)?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    22. Re:Two words... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Au contraire! It took my 20 minutes of quality Q-Tip & RS Solvent Cleaner work last time I did one...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    23. Re:Two words... by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      Yes, it cuts through everything, including most plastics.
      And Toons.. Don't forget about the Toons!!!
      Anyone else have visions of Judge Doom holding Roger Rabbit over a vat of acetone?

    24. Re:Two words... by alienmole · · Score: 1
      And when they say you cleaned off your artic silver you tell them you used the alcohol to clean of the approved grease so the chip was nice and clean for them.

      Next we'll be seeing AMD job postings for "Forensic Chip Analysts"...

    25. Re:Two words... by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      You can also get acetone at any hardware store. And it's cheaper than nail polish remover.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    26. Re:Two words... by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      Acetone is overkill. I use peanut butter.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
  3. Seems reasonable by Pres.+Ronald+Reagan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AMD doesn't want to be responsible for people using too weak of heatsink/fans or too much thermal grease. What is the problem here?

    --

    Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born.
    --Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:Seems reasonable by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 3, Funny

      What is the problem here?

      The problem is, their past CPUs have been known to be about 4 degrees hotter than the Sun. Maybe I want something better than what they want me to have.

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
    2. Re:Seems reasonable by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 4, Interesting

      uh, because with their thermal crap and the defauult fan, my proc ran over 130F. With artic silver and an aeroflow fan from vantec, my proc runs at 105F (115F under heavy load). Seems to me they are just trying to save a few bucks, afterall, the german economy has taken a hit lately. That is the problem here

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    3. Re:Seems reasonable by domninus.DDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or with a dangerden kit it wont break 40C, like mine!

    4. Re:Seems reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was going to buy a water cooling kit and fill it with anti-freeze instead of water, but i didn't have the money. so a nice fan i got instead

    5. Re:Seems reasonable by KilerCris · · Score: 1

      The problem is what if the CPU is defective and breaks on its own, or came broken out of the box. All you were doing was keeping it cooler, improving its operating conditions, but now you're just screwed.

    6. Re:Seems reasonable by Sokie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does the German economy have to do with anything? Just because AMD has a fab there doesn't mean that they are based there. Seems like the German economy being down would let them hire workers cheaper for the Fab 30 in Dresden.

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    7. Re:Seems reasonable by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      because with their thermal crap and the defauult fan, my proc ran over 130F

      AMD doesn't guarantee you the ability to overclock the processor.

    8. Re:Seems reasonable by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 0

      i never sed it did, but 130f is unhealthy, and will bring about a shorter life time. I don't overclock anyway, the apps i run would become unstable if i were to overclock

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    9. Re:Seems reasonable by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      No they don't. But my old AMD box did this exact same thing with the reccomended heatsink and the thermal tape stuff and the stock speed. 130 is too high. Anyone remember when CPU's did not need heatsinks? Can we ever go back to this?

      --

      Gorkman

    10. Re:Seems reasonable by Dunkalis · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. As you personally know, my gigantic noisy fan is the only thing keeping my Athlon 1.4GHz T-Bird from overheating. Its not overclocked either. And, as others have said, German economy? What does it have to do with this? AMD is an American company.

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
    11. Re:Seems reasonable by Harinezumi · · Score: 1

      Not all AMD processors are sold with the default heatsink/fan. I know I bought just the processor when I was building my current machine, and saved myself over $30 as a result. That $30 got me a tube of Arctic Silver 3, a copper shim, and a heat sink that got my processor running about 10C cooler than what I've seen posted for the default heatsink/fan. Had to pay a bit extra for the fan to go along with it, but the reduced noise was worth every penny. Assuming I didn't crack the processor during installation of the heatsink (that's what the shim is for!), why shouldn't my processor be covered by the warranty?

    12. Re:Seems reasonable by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      sure. but the fan will be so loud you'll have to put the PC in the shed/garage/barn to get some sleep.

      seriously some systems dont need alot of cooling power (at least not a 40CFM fan + honkin big heatsink) the problem is they are expensive as all hell.

      the basic breakdown is the more power a CPU needs the hotter it will run (generally speaking). hopefully the opteron and athlon64 will help sut down on the need for Xtreme cooling.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    13. Re:Seems reasonable by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      They'd better rethink their policy on heatsinks/fans that come in their retail boxes, then. Last I checked, AMD was shipping nothing but shiny paperweights for their heatsinks. They were low-power, low-noise solutions that were targeted soley for people who would buy a fast CPU for web surfing and word processing and not use their CPU to the fullest.

      Without exception, all gamers I knew of who used stock heatsinks eventually broke down and bought aftermarket cooling solutions since they were sick of their CPUs overheating and crashing in the middle of a fight in Quake 3. I'm talking about systems that weren't even overclocked and cases with powerful intake and exhaust fans.

      AMD heatsink/fans are worthless for anyone who expects to use their processor at its fullest potential.

    14. Re:Seems reasonable by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      uh, because with their thermal crap and the defauult fan, my proc ran over 130F.

      Please! My Athlon XP 1800+ has been running at 70 degrees celsius for over a year now with nary a hiccup. You're paranoid!

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    15. Re:Seems reasonable by Saidin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      130 F is only about 54 C. AMD's processors are rated for a max of 90 C (the XPs are anyway, it varies slightly from processor to processor, but that is ballpark). 130 F is not at all dangerous (assuming you were actually measuring from a thermal resistor, and not from a thermistor under the core). The fact that you got the temperature down to 105 F (about 40 C), is simply a don't care from a part lifetime point of view. Most likely they are designed to last 10 years at 110 C (maybe 125 if they are more pessimistic).

    16. Re:Seems reasonable by evilviper · · Score: 1
      AMD doesn't want to be responsible for people using too weak of heatsink/fans or too much thermal grease.

      Fine, then they can try to verify that the chip was 100% perfect, and if they can't prove it, they give you a replacement.

      What is the problem here?

      There are too many to name. First of all, what about people that want to use a liquid cooler, oversized heatsink, or some other method of cooling? Should they be limited to using the hardware only as AMD says they are allowed to?

      Next, they will say that AMD CPUs may only be used in Asus motherboards, and using anything else will void your warranty... They could claim it's because other mobos MIGHT give the CPU a surge... Of course, it doesn't matter to AMD that the other mobos (or colling devices) are just as good, they just want to follow everyone else's warranty methods, and drop their warranty to a year or less. Of course, doing so would give Intel a clear advantage, so they want the increased sales that posting a 3-year warranty gives them, but they don't want to have to honor the warranty.

      Long story short, it's my CPU, and I'll use whatever accessories I damn well please. They can't limit the uses of it, even with their warranty.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Seems reasonable by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      when my proc hits 130F or higher it gets sluggish, and that's not good. i dont care what it's rated for, experience tells me to keep the temp low

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    18. Re:Seems reasonable by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      shut up chris. i'm just messing.
      can't i make one lousy error. i mean, i am god, i'm entiteled to a mistake or two. geez!

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    19. Re:Seems reasonable by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      You're probably using a P4, which throttles down as it gets hotter.

    20. Re:Seems reasonable by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      lol, no, i'm using an AMD, kinda hard not to know what i'm using :)

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    21. Re:Seems reasonable by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      And if you're using your proc to its fullest potential, you're probably upgrading every year or so anyway.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    22. Re:Seems reasonable by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

      Well, I can tell you for a fact that the heatsink /fan combo that came with the boxed Athlon's I
      used to build some systems last fall looked
      cheap. I don't overclock, but I bought an
      overclocker's style heatsink/fan combo, and
      combined it with Artic Alumina from Arctic Silver
      and everything works very well.

    23. Re:Seems reasonable by rob_macgregor · · Score: 1
      seriously some systems dont need alot of cooling power


      Take a look at the VIA C3 and EDEN chips. I've got a 533 MHz C3 with nothing more than a heatsink and a 1 GHz system with a tiny low-noise fan.

      They're not exactly great for gaming, but for average desktop use they're just fine.
      --
      Following the rules doesn't get the job done.
    24. Re:Seems reasonable by jeff_bond · · Score: 1
      uh, because with their thermal crap and the defauult fan, my proc ran over 130F

      Ever thought that they might be designed to run at over 130F? Did running at 130F cause you any problems?

      Jeff

      --
      stty erase ^H
    25. Re:Seems reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temperature does not affect performance. Take some EE and physics courses.

    26. Re:Seems reasonable by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

      my xp 1700+ does run at 70c peak and is NOT sluggish.

      maybe, you need a fresh system? sometimes (especially on kids computers) there's something wrong that 'sluggishizes' the system AND heats up the processor...

      not that i wanna tell you something. :]

      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    27. Re:Seems reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man you are an idiot. Paranoid idiot. Cooling fanatic. Better save your ears.

    28. Re:Seems reasonable by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      you know, i might actually listen to you, except that the problem was solved with a new fan/heatsink and some grease.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    29. Re:Seems reasonable by james+b · · Score: 1

      My XP1800+ 'boxed' hits 130F with some regularity, and it's not overclocked, just using the heatsink and thermal tape that came in the box from AMD.

  4. This is news? by s20451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You do something that could potentially damage the processor (read the article), the company is perfectly well within its legal and moral rights to void the warranty. The warranty is not insurance against malice or stupidity.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  5. thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    State Law mandates a 1 year parts and manufacturing warranty irregardless of OEM status or not. Say what you will about Calif. but we do look after the consumer, except for the power consumer that is...

    1. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's nice, but it doesn't protect you if you intentionally use the product in ways it wasn't intended to be used. Like using thermal grease as a coolant.

    2. Re:thank God I live in California by Phleg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't necessarily a good thing, especially when you fuck over businesses in order to do it. If you don't agree with the business' stance, and want to use a different heatsink while keeping your warranty, but Intel. If you think it's worth voiding the warranty, by all means, go for it. Don't force companies to cater to idiots who don't know how to install hardware properly.

      --
      No comment.
    3. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like someone is an unemployed, underappreciated english major.

    4. Re:thank God I live in California by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Haven't you seen The Parlor?* "Irregardless" means "without lack of regard".

      *http://v8gtang.com/Vids/the_parlor_dsl.wmv (~90MB and slow)

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    5. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use thermal grease as a coolant?! Yer Stewwwpid, La lal a lala la HAHAHAHA

    6. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll stop using "irregardless" once you stop confusing "its" with "it's". Do we have a deal?

    7. Re:thank God I live in California by cheezedawg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, this is the kind of crap that drives me nuts about California. Why the hell do they think that they have any business messing with product warranties? Its crap like this that adds up to a $30+ billion deficit...

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    8. Re:thank God I live in California by Fat+Casper · · Score: 1
      State Law mandates a 1 year parts and manufacturing warranty irregardless of OEM status or not.

      Riiight. Had a guy come into the shop in January. He'd had some mechanic install a third party remote starter. Guess what? It fried the car's computer. Then he had the balls to come in and demand a replacement under warranty. I didn't laugh to his face, as such, but I did bait him a bit by being a but slow on the uptake. "I'm sorry sir, but I still don't get the part where we're responsible for your mechanic installing somebody else's part improperly. Tell me again."

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    9. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you were a total duesche bag, but he deserved it.

    10. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop using irregardless.. its a made up word.

      It's a double-negative at worst by itself.

      The problems in this case are:
      - using the wrong word.
      - adding words that only add confusion.

      Wrong: irregardless of OEM status or not.
      Right: regardless of OEM status.

      I have no idea what the intention of "or not" is in that sentence. "Without lack of attention to OEM status or not." Is that non-incorrect or not?

      Using irregardless is understandable, it's a long word. Obviously the OP should stick to shorter ones.

      Its is wrong.

      That's true, why did you use it?

    11. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think one could make the argument that Consumer Protection Laws -> Higher Standard of Living -> More likely to attract corporate headquarters and venture investment -> More tax revenue.

    12. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on. California is know to be unfriendly to bussiness. Why would anybody do bussiness there. For heavens sake they just receintly are able to keep the lights on and they brings up the fact the state is negative 30 billion dollars.

    13. Re:thank God I live in California by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of the national budget. I doubt California alone is $30 billion short (correct me if I'm wrong).

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    14. Re:thank God I live in California by nolife · · Score: 1

      Fried the computer? Did he say it was because of his mechanic or did you assume it was because he had a remote starter installed? All a remote starter does is jumper around the key for various positions (Acc1, Acc2, Start, and Run), for some it can bypass the alarm or disable a factory alarm so the car can start. All it does is provide +12v and ground or open and close contacts via relays (high current) or a transistorized circuit (low current like less then 300ma). to simulate the key in the various positions. That being said.. I believe it IS possible for this to happen but you would have to be extremely unlucky based on what a remote starter actually does. I know it sounds cut and dry to you and remote starters sound complex but they are by no means an advanced electonic product.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    15. Re:thank God I live in California by ecalkin · · Score: 1

      my favorate part of Caliornia and warranties is from several years ago (10+) and may have changed since then:

      apparently, back then in california, warranty periods did not 'age' while your product was being worked on. i think it was full days only. if your car needed service and was in the shop for 3 days, your warranty gained an extra day at the end. if you got a computer with a 90 day warranty and it spent a week in the shop, the warranty became 95 days or something like that.

      sometimes people wonder how state laws affect people in other states?

      i was working at a regional computer dealership in central kentucky. good ole' ibm had a shortage of floppy drives for parts replacement. and guess what: california got dibs because ibm needed the warranties to expire when they were supposed to! we had ibm ps/2s waiting for weeks for floppy drives. again, this was 10+ years ago.

      just my 2 cents.

    16. Re:thank God I live in California by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why the hell do they think that they have any business messing with product warranties? Its crap like this that adds up to a $30+ billion deficit...

      Before the energy crisis California had a large surplus ($14 billion). After, California had a very large deficit. Any questions?

      Not that 9/11 helped any either, of course.

      On a related note, how in the world could a law about product warranties affect California's financial situation?

    17. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bull fucking shit, that is the biggest load of horse shit I've heard in a long time. How the fuck does a mandated 1yr warranty cause a $30BN deficit anywere? If it does, the fucking good, that will teach those companies for creating such shitty products. You really got to hate it when the government tries to help out the consumer, damn them. I wish they'd just have no consumer protection laws.

      Come of you dumb piece of shit, pull your head out of your ass. My god does your completely stupid reactionary post make me pissed off, fuck you.

      If this was a troll you really cought me, if not it bloody well should be. How the fuck you're not (-1: Troll) I have no fucking idea.

      Man, fuck you.

    18. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "douche bag" you fucking douche bag.

    19. Re:thank God I live in California by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      Er actually I think it's things like the military that add up to a $30+ billion deficit...

    20. Re:thank God I live in California by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      It ain't the starter that is the problem.

      All it has to do is send a poorly-filtered power spike (extremely easy for this to happen with a remote starter circuit; lots of current, a little inductance or capacitance, and you've got a sudden transient of a few thousand volts. Goodbyte computer!

      And it isn't the fault of the manufacturer -- as designed into the car, nothing would have gone wrong. A poorly designed remote starter can easily cause this kind of problem.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    21. Re:thank God I live in California by Enonu · · Score: 1

      You hit the point on exactly. Government imposed quality regulations only hurt the industry. They make it so companies don't want to improve quality, they make the barrier to entry lower for quality, and they put companies who've built a good names for themselves on the same level as some new startup who just happens to meet the minimums.

      Note to consumers, don't be an idiot, do some research on the product you buy before you buy it. Maybe then you'll buy something that lasts for heaven forbid > 1 year. Give no mercy to companies that skimp on quality, otherwise you'll see the same situation as with what's going on in the hard drive industry (all IDE drives, all manufacturers, 1 year max warranty).

    22. Re:thank God I live in California by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      No, it's California's debt alone. To make things worse for them, because they lied, cheated, dumped fresh water into sewers, etc. they obtained a large 'water rights' deal, meaning that for decades California recieved a few hundred billion gallons of water annually that they leagally shouldn't have recieved. The surrounding states (that border California, as well as pretty much every other state with the Colorado river running through it) recently won a large case, in which they won back the rights to the water that California stole. They lost the water as of Jan 1, 2003. And if California takes more water that doesn't belong to them, it is coming out of Mexico's allotment, which then violates a whole series international treaties with one of the US's most important trade partners.

      What's the deal with the WATER?

      Well, remember that the whole area is desert; water makes it possible to even support a large population, and a larger economy (fruits & vegetebales, which are among California's cash cows, require plenty of water.)

      So now California has $30 billion in debt, as well as a massive water shortage-- they don't have enough water to feed thier population, let alone their crops. So a big chunk of California's tax income (from farmers) is going to shrink even further.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    23. Re:thank God I live in California by BrianH · · Score: 1

      Stand corrected. The California deficit, last I checked, was $36.4 billion dollars. That's more deficit than all of the other state deficits combined. You know how California is...this place always has to be first in everything :\

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    24. Re:thank God I live in California by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Bzzzzzzzzzzt. This is the state of California's deficit; not the US defecit. California doesn't fund its national guard; the federal government does.

      And there's more than double the amount of money spent on welfare programs that don't work than there is on the military; not to mention that the military spending keeps millions of americans on the payroll: Engineers, scientists, skilled laborers, and all the supporting middlemen.

      And much of this spending (and research) quickly filters down to civilian applications (and the 'greater good'). There's a difference between a guy working for a living, and a guy who sits on welfare, eats prime rib everyday, drives a BMW, and has a big-screen TV. I've seen these kinds of abuse firsthand, in several cities, over several years. In fact, I've met many who state flat out that they have no intention but to live on welfare; they get more money from welfare than they could earn.

      The point isn't that welfare is a bad thing; but that its' broken. The people are more than willing to work; but they're also smart enough to know a free ride when they see it.

      The real problem is that they can't get a job that pays well enough; either they are unskilled or, more often, have employers who don't pay them what they are worth.

      It's interesting, really... it's a form of Adam Smith's 'invisible hand': The employer is unwilling to pay their workers enough, so people have to depend on welfare; because people depend on welfare, the employer (either company, or personally) ends up paying the difference in taxes. The difference is that administration costs, etc. involved with welfare eat up money to keep this badly hobbled system going...

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    25. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, that kind of puts Europe's TWO year warranty mandate in question. Oh, wait, no it doesn't. It just means people aren't getting screwed by hard drive makers.

    26. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it had nothing to do with the imploding economy, and especially the overhyped tech sector.

    27. Re:thank God I live in California by KiahZero · · Score: 1
      There's a difference between a guy working for a living, and a guy who sits on welfare, eats prime rib everyday, drives a BMW, and has a big-screen TV.

      I call bullshit. Facts about welfare. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you have sincere compassion for the disadvantaged. Why then would you make outlandish claims which are clearly not the mean of the people on welfare? I'd argue, though without anything to back it up with at this moment, that people like that are at least 2 standard deviations out from the mean.

      In fact, I've met many who state flat out that they have no intention but to live on welfare; they get more money from welfare than they could earn.

      My understanding is that this is true, albeit misrepresented. Yes, people can often make more money on welfare than they can by working, but they are not often happy about it. Most people have well-established morals, and truly want to work. But when working puts them below the already meager state of living they are at, what do you expect? Asceticism is all well and good, but there's a line.

      The real problem is that they can't get a job that pays well enough; either they are unskilled or, more often, have employers who don't pay them what they are worth. ...The employer is unwilling to pay their workers enough, so people have to depend on welfare; because people depend on welfare, the employer (either company, or personally) ends up paying the difference in taxes.

      Interesting argument... I like it. Would be a good point for raising the minimum wage, since theoretically poverty would go down and we could cut the budget accordingly, thus lowering taxes.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    28. Re:thank God I live in California by kesuki · · Score: 1

      How does forcing full 1 year warrenties lead to 30 billion dollar debt/deficits?
      And honstly what do you think the governement is there for?
      Consumer protection issues is one of the more valid purpouses of the governemnt, and is done relatively cheaply.
      BTW, is that an Annual defict? or is that the total debt tally, including the 12.5 billion they used to bail out the electric power companies...

    29. Re:thank God I live in California by Shadestalker · · Score: 1

      Note to self: non-words such as "irregardless" are considered "informative."

    30. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled Deutsch bag you douchebag.

    31. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that they can't get a job that pays well enough . . . have employers who don't pay them what they are worth

      Worth to whom? Worth is not an intrinsic or objective fact; it only exists in relation to what people are willing to pay for it.

      Would be a good point for raising the minimum wage, since theoretically poverty would go down and we could cut the budget accordingly, thus lowering taxes.

      Er, no. Under essentially all accepted macroeconomic theories, raising the minimum wage in the short term increases unemployment, as the increase in the marginal price of labor causes some employers whose finances are skating on the edge to cut back on workers and others to go bankrupt; and in the long term, wage increases not backed by higher productivity simply cause inflation.

    32. Re:thank God I live in California by Fat+Casper · · Score: 1
      Fried the computer? Did he say it was because of his mechanic or did you assume it was because he had a remote starter installed? All a remote starter does is jumper around the key for various positions (Acc1, Acc2, Start, and Run), for some it can bypass the alarm or disable a factory alarm so the car can start.

      There're a lot of computers in the car. The one that fried was the body control module, one of the more important ones. It controls, among other things, the aforementioned alarm. Someone we don't know played with it and attatched something we've never seen. We replace BCMs very rarely. If the unknown mechanic and third party equipment aren't what killed it, then he's just unlucky as hell. Remember, though, that planning is a huge part of luck, and this guy knew he was doing. He was saving $150 or so by having someone else fuck with his electrics. If you've got black boxes that can fail mysteriously, don't tinker with them and expect the factory to subsidise you. My company offers a remote starter that we guarantee. AMD offers a cooling solution that they guarantee. Neither one of us is going to pay you for having gone with someone else's product.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    33. Re:thank God I live in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, tell us what you really think...

    34. Re:thank God I live in California by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1

      Western Digital special edition dives have a three year warranty. You might try researching an analogy first...

      --
      Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
    35. Re:thank God I live in California by mengel · · Score: 1
      Actually, Military spending is the least efficient way to employ people via government spending.

      Education (i.e. hiring more teachers, reducing class sizes, etc.) is the most effiecient way to employ people via government spending. For example, according to the National Priorities Project website, for the cost of our little excursion into Iraq, we could have hired 1,541,037 Elementary School Teachers.

      The problem with military spending is that huge portions of the expenditure end up in the pockets of the CEOs of the military-industrial complex companies (McDonnel-Douglas, etc.). This especially when you count the billions of dollars of unrequested added weapons that Congress has the U.S. Military purchase.

      Another huge chunk of Military spending (especially when you use the military, as in Iraq) is simply sent overseas to Arab countries to buy oil.

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    36. Re:thank God I live in California by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. Facts about welfare [cossa.org]. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you have sincere compassion for the disadvantaged. Why then would you make outlandish claims which are clearly not the mean of the people on welfare? I'd argue, though without anything to back it up with at this moment, that people like that are at least 2 standard deviations out from the mean.

      I've done all kinds of social work in the projects, in different cities, for years. It is not a case of isolated incidents. Their homes were nicer than mine by a long shot... at least on the inside, behind double-steel doors and caged-windows. Frankly, I often don't blame them for never wanting to leave their homes; the inside of their apartment is nice... but the 'public' areas are, of course, dried-up sewers (with the same smell and a large number of rats and other predators). They're usually cleaned by hosing everything off-- nothing more. Which is OK, since the corridors are bare concrete anyway... no attempt was even made to build them with materials that actually could be cleaned off.

      My understanding is that this is true, albeit misrepresented. Yes, people can often make more money on welfare than they can by working, but they are not often happy about it.

      There's a difference between having no intention to get off welfare, and liking it. Of course they don't like it; but they're not stupid either. If they can't feed their families by working, but can by living on welfare, then they do what is best for their family. You don't have to be on welfare to make life decisions that are the best for your family, not for your dignity. In their place, I would do no different; and like them, I wouldn't like it either. As one gentleman (who was clinically insane) told me in one of his more lucid moments: 'I know it sounds bad... [that] I don't want to get a job; but if I do, then I lose my home and food. I may be crazy, but I'm not stupid.'

      I honestly think that welfare should help people who have meager jobs a lot more than is currently done. I'm not sure raising the minimum wage is the best idea; however I am finding myself liking the idea of a 'maximum wage' for a CEO and/or management. I'm not saying that a CEO shouldn't be able to make enough money to be filthy stinkin' rich. But there's a big difference between being wealthy, and being so wealthy that you're just keeping score. It would also have a stabilizing influence on companies, who wouldn't have to offer their executives fat bonuses to keep them from jumping ship, because they couldn't make more by working for another company.

      By having a maximum wage, it kind of implys a minimum wage; take even one million a year off the top exec's salary, and you can employ 30 more people for a full year at the GDP per capita rate. Take several million from each exec's salary, and there is a lot more money available to either build the company, or pay more employees (or pay current employees more), which then makes it possible for the company to grow even more.

      In my head (I'm an Engineer, not an economist), the economy would grow rapidly with this kind of arrangement.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    37. Re:thank God I live in California by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Education (i.e. hiring more teachers, reducing class sizes, etc.) is the most effiecient way to employ people via government spending.

      This, of course, depends on how you wish to define efficiency. I'm not sure how well you remember high school, but most of the kids there don't want to learn anything. More teachers won't change that.

      Paying the teachers more (or to be more precice, paying more to get good teachers) will have a more significant impact. The problem is that a teacher's salary isn't high enough to feed a family anymore. Frankly, there are a lot of people in educaton who really shouldn't be there at all; they are awful teachers, horrible role models, despicable people, and worse, unionized.

      Nothing like a system so corrupt that the worst teachers have their position protected by a union. So much for putting the kids first. I have, in my entire life, only seen one educator that could inspire kids who really didn't want to even be in school, to actually like learning. One, out of several hundred. On the other hand, I've seen 30-40 'teachers' who are such filth, that they actively discourage students from learning. Wanna guess which got fired, and which the union protected? The inspirational teacher bucked the status quo; students loved him and learned from him. And the teacher's union didn't like the 'disharmony' among the faculty that he was supposely responsible for; which is a lousy way of saying "he's making us look bad." So he got his walking papers.

      For example, according to the National Priorities Project [natprior.org] website, for the cost of our little excursion into Iraq, we could have hired 1,541,037 Elementary School Teachers.

      For how long? One year? Such a nice temporary solution. No long-term thinking involved, a 'solution' for the sound-byte crowd.

      It certainly isn't a permanent solution-- the economy can't support it indefinately; the war lasted less than 30 days-- it could not have been supported economically indefinately either. Millions of 'military-industrial' workers-- engineers, technicians, factory workers, and more-- at Mc Donnell-Douglass, Boeing, Lockheed, and Raytheon will be employed for quite some time to come. There was a massive expenditure; but it ends up in the pockets of these people -- not the CEO's of these companies as you accuse.

      These companies make more money in civilian jobs than in military ones -- Boeing is the world's largest maker of commercial jets; but McDonnell-Douglas and Lockheed also make commercial jets. All three make sattelite-lifting rockets. Raytheon is also one of the countries experts in microwave technology (they even make microwave ovens!), and radars -- keeping commercial jets from crashing into each other, and cooking your food. The CEO's of these companies make less than those of American Airlines, for crying out loud!!! You can't say that the money that goes into military is lost; it's not, and it rapidly finds its way to civilian use, helping everyone.

      You could hire 1,541,037 teachers for a year -- temporary.

      However removing Saddam has made a permanent difference in the lives of some-odd 54 million people, one which most of those 54 million consider a good thing. (They would just like the U.S. to leave ASAP, so they can forge their own future, for good or for bad).

      More teachers isn't the answer. Better teachers is. I would rather have a classroom size of 200, with an excellent teacher, than a class size of 10 with a bad teacher. But the economics just doesn't support it yet; the people who would make the best teachers are already in other industries, like the newspaper business, or at an engineering firm; because there is no economic incentive to teach. (rather the opposite, in fact).

      Of course, if we did that, then we would have to fire a few hundred thousand k-12 educators, and the unions wouldn't have it. They're more interested in protecting the job security of rotten teachers than they are of the student's welfare.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    38. Re:thank God I live in California by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between a guy working for a living, and a guy who sits on welfare, eats prime rib everyday, drives a BMW, and has a big-screen TV.

      I call bullshit. Facts about welfare [cossa.org]. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you have sincere compassion for the disadvantaged. Why then would you make outlandish claims which are clearly not the mean of the people on welfare? I'd argue, though without anything to back it up with at this moment, that people like that are at least 2 standard deviations out from the mean.


      He saw that other guy make outlandish claims about politics (the California deficit) and get modded up (+1, Libertarian?), so he decided to follow suit?

    39. Re:thank God I live in California by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Thank God I don't live in California.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  6. That...intresting... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what does that say? Either too many people are either applying the grease too thickly, or people are using heatsinks and OCin' their processors too much.

    Basicly what it sounds like is, people are cooking their CPU's from either/or...and AMD is tired of floating the loss because of idiots.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:That...intresting... by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 3, Informative

      well, i can attest that people do use too much grease, i know i did when i first put on my own fan. I corrected the mistake, and the proc has been fine since. my question is, if you can't use grease, what do you use. that foamy pad stuff? it doesnt work nearly as well. Either way, i'll stick with my after-market fan and arctic silver, warranty be damned.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    2. Re:That...intresting... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Either that or some nebbish of a middle-manager got a little over excited and made a new rule in order to justify his presence on the payroll. If this policy gets retracred or at least heavily watered down in the next couple of weeks, that'll mean one less nebbish on the payroll.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:That...intresting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't possibly be that stupid. No wonder you have no life. Your grasp of reality is horrendous.

    4. Re:That...intresting... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well the newer stuff is usually paraffin wax, it works really good for factory line's when your building alot of computers...but that's about it. Some of the older heat pad stuff was not much more then a chunk of cloth stuck to the heatsink.

      But your right, it doesn't work and in my experiance hurts the ability to cool your processor.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:That...intresting... by labratuk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Basicly

      That's Basically.

      Ba-si-cally.

      Now write it out in full 20 times. And don't use copy/paste. I'll know.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    6. Re:That...intresting... by labratuk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Alright. Calm down, I was kidding, y'know.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    7. Re:That...intresting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't apologize! He's an idiot!

      Christ, learn English or fuck off, people!

    8. Re:That...intresting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear God man, why are there so many spelling nazis today? I mean, sure, there are always some, but never this many.

    9. Re:That...intresting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? Yet another mod who doesn't know his arse from a pinecone.

    10. Re:That...intresting... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I would say next time then, don't be quite so much of a troll based on comments, or spelling. Not all of us, really give a flying rats ass.

      For some of us that are forced to write pretty words all day long, by hand...using a computer and making spelling mistakes is pure joy.

      You have to find your pleasure somewhere, otherwise...you simply become cynical, bitter, and in general a grumpy pain in the ass. I don't like being grumpy.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:That...intresting... by echucker · · Score: 1

      Either too many people are either applying the grease too thickly..........

      Methinks the uninformed are simply using what comes out of the tube. Have you ever seen a tube of paste (besides the useless one-time packets) that actually dispensed what you needed?

    12. Re:That...intresting... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Good pads work just as well as any thermal compound, the only real problem with 'em is that they are one-use only. And I'm quite certain AMD Boxed heatsinks only ship with one pre-applied pad.

    13. Re:That...intresting... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You aren't supposed to be using a hammer to get the paste out of the tube. A nice even gentle squeeze is all you need to get a nice slow flow out of the tube. I've never had more paste on the processor than I wanted. The tricky part is finding a space that the paste doesn't stick to so you can evenly spread it across the CPU's surface.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    14. Re:That...intresting... by nmos · · Score: 1
      So what does that say? Either too many people are either applying the grease too thickly, or people are using heatsinks and OCin' their processors too much.


      This may not have anything to do with overheating. It's apparently* pretty easy to crack the core on an Athlon while installing the heatsink and a thermal pad provides far more protection from this than grease does.

      * I've probably installed over a hundred Athlons/Durons by now and I've never cracked any of them but I've seen enough reports by others to believe it's possible if you arn't carefull.
    15. Re:That...intresting... by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      "Basicly what it sounds like is, people are cooking their CPU's from either/or...and AMD is tired of floating the loss because of idiots."

      you would think a more customer friendly way to cut down on replacing oc'd cpu's would be one bit in the cpu that would set and stay on if the bus were ever pushed passed its "sold as" speed, and if anyone had a defective chip that had the bit set to on, could then be told to take a walk

    16. Re:That...intresting... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      A good point actually. I have, while I don't buy AMD products in a normal year, the stuff they gave me with my last P4(1.7ghz 478) was enough to cover atleast 4 CPU's.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    17. Re:That...intresting... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      A good idea the question then becomes, how long before someone figures out what "pin" is used for monitoring, or how to bake the guts of the CPU with highvoltage to fry everything inside. It wouldn't take much ofcourse, but then AMD might go after the board manufacture or the consumer after the board manufacture instead.

      We'll have to see in the end right?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    18. Re:That...intresting... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I've never cracked an athlon core(I have cracked a few Intel chips tho, when they first came out.), I have much as you've seen and heard reports of them. But, if that's the case then perhaps they need to go back to having a heat spreader...I've heard that the new Opteron's are using them. Or perhaps they need to move to a heat sink design that doesn't put quite so much pressure on the chasis and CPU core.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  7. Re:I really am quite astonished by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're an idiot and break your processor while overclocking on it, why should AMD pay?

    Why should us other AMD customers pay for that matter?

    I'm astonished that there's any kind of warranty for broken/melted cores at all.
    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  8. How is this reasonable? by confused+philosopher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well printer companies already do this with their "official inks" and every other company does this so that you use more of their stuff.

    Is it good business? Maybe. See below:

    Is is going to make customers like you? Hell NO!

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
    1. Re:How is this reasonable? by ToastyMunch · · Score: 1

      It's just a means to reduce their own liability should something go wrong. The same thing happens when you void your warranty to install RAM in your own laptop.

      So, will "power users" (read: overclockers) like it? Prolly not. Do most consumers worry about it? Not really, and it could potentially save AMD a lot in fraudulent claims...

    2. Re:How is this reasonable? by BitHive · · Score: 1
      How did the parent get modded "Insightful"? This is not at all like printer manufacturers forcing you to buy ink from them. Tell me--how many replacement heatsinks do you typically buy for your CPUs during their useful lifetime? Zero? One?

      As other people have pointed out, this is AMD's way of covering their asses from all the [H]ardOCP morons that will slap the HSF of the week on their new chip then complain when it breaks.

    3. Re:How is this reasonable? by Guilly · · Score: 1

      I'll grant you that there is no connection with printer manufacturers. As for how many replacement FANS I buy during a CPU's useful lifetime, I'd say at least 2. Dust gets caught inside fans, moving parts wear out and the first thing you know is that your fan makes weird noises or simply stops working. Cleaning fans often may make them last longer but eventually you have to change them. North bridge fans are even worse, IMHO, and they're usually harder to replace :(

    4. Re:How is this reasonable? by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

      Explain how this isn't just like the Ink? Some recylced and off-brand cartridges break printers, and it is against the printers' agreements.

      There could be a black list, or good-list of heatsinks/fans, but right now it is just ONE! In dusty environments you can end up changing fans at least once, especially if one is noisy and the other isn't.

      --
      Why slashdot? Why not?
    5. Re:How is this reasonable? by BitHive · · Score: 1
      I will grant you that dust and other wear and tear might lead to replacing the fan (and _maybe_ the heatsink, though I can't imagine it getting so dirty that a little compressed air wouldn't clean it), but honestly how many times are you going to do that?

      Printer ink is a different case. If I'm replacing cartridges every month or so, then of course I want the freedom to buy cheapo ones or refill them. Heatsinks are not high-dollar items, and I can't imagine that AMD would mark up replacement heatsinks the way, say, Epson marks up their ink, since you'll need to buy one or maybe two replacement HSFs until you get a new CPU altogether.

    6. Re:How is this reasonable? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      >>how many replacement heatsinks do you typically buy for your CPUs during their useful lifetime?

      Well, seeing as between the three most recent computers me and my family have had (which are those that are still in reasonable use) I've seen 5 fans die. One (P-100) had the original fan die. Then the replacement fan die. My dad replaced it with a 120 mm or something fan he screded to the case and pointed at the processor. Athlon 500: came with TWO processor fans (this was one of the slot processors, so the heatsink was plenty long enough). Both died. Again, replaced with an 120 mm. Athlon XP 2000+: stock fan died in 8 months. Replaced with a ThermalTake Volcano.

    7. Re:How is this reasonable? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      answer = none. After the first one fails, buy yourself a nice aftermarket fan, warranties are overrated anyway^^

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    8. Re:How is this reasonable? by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      >CPUs during their useful lifetime? Zero? One?

      Let's look at the Duron 750 (at 800) I'm using here:

      1. KWI brand Socket 7 HSF (local dealers wouldn't recognize AMD approved heatsinks if they sat on them)

      2. Taisol CEK733092 (pretty nice)

      3. Thermaltake Volcano II (okay sink, leftover from a Thunderbird 1200, and used when I couldn't find the Taisol anymore, but the fan has gotten quite noisy quite fast)

      I have a spare copper sink I may bolt on it, because it's tending to sound a little loud lately.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  9. keep buying those AMDs folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and drive down the price of my Intel, thanks :)

    1. Re:keep buying those AMDs folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High five dude.

  10. Just like printer ink refills. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    AMD does not have the legal right to prevent you from using 3rd party heatsinks as long as they're designed for the AMD CPUs. This is the same as saying using 3rd party ink in the printer will void the warranty. In both cases, the company is still legally obligated to honor the warranty, but fighting them in court for it is another matter.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by Ethidium · · Score: 1

      >In both cases, the company is still legally
      >obligated to honor the warranty

      By what law? Maybe if you live in a state like CA that has aggresive consumer-protection laws, but AFAIK this is hard from universal. Unless your state dictates otherwise, if it says in the warantee document that using a third party thermal grease voids the warantee, then it does.

      As far as overclocking goes, last I checked overclocking in and of itself voided the warantee on most processors. If you want to push the thing beyond its intended limits, fine, but don't expect me to pay for it (via increased prices) if it breaks. That's like saying that my car warantee should cover the damage from driving off a cliff at 100 mph while fleeing the cops.

      I am not a lawyer or a warantee expert, but I don't see what the big deal is, so long as the thing works with the default HS/F.

      --
      \
    2. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      In both cases, the company is still legally obligated to honor the warranty

      I doubt it.

      If you buy a car, then try to run it with a non-standard radiator, do you think the manufacturer is going to honour *that* warranty if your engine overheats?

      AMD has no way to test every 3rd-party heatsink out there to make sure it cools CPUs well enough. They include one that works just fine, and IMO that is the extent of their liability.

      If *anyone* should be held accountable if your CPU overheats with a 3rd-party cooler installed, it's the cooler manufacturer, not AMD.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by avalys · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. If the warranty states they won't honor it if you use 3rd party heatsinks, that's it. End of story. They're the ones offering the warranty - you can take it or leave it. The law doesn't force them to offer a warranty at all.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      I don't over-clock because it's not worth it. I ran my K6-2-300 at 350 for a while, and every time I ran anything CPU intensive it crashed. When I went back down to 300 everything worked perfectly and it seemed faster. 2 GHz is so fast now, I'd rather have it run cooler by running it at 1500MHz than deal with overheating by running it at 2200MHz.

      The warranty doesn't have anything to with over-heating. I've used thermal compound since my 486 CPUs. With an early pentium I had to explain to the person at the store that it wasn't glue. (The parallel port blew on a 2 week old MB).

      All other factors being equal (no over-clocking), using thermal compound is better for the CPU than not using it. Every heatsink I've ever installed on anything (going back to power transistors in the 70's) used it. Now this stupid company says it voids the warranty. WHY?

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    5. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the non-standard radiator is designed for that car, then they have to honour the warranty. This is part of anti-trust law, I thought it would be hugely popular here on slashdot. The reasoning is that it prevents the car makers from using their dominance of the car market to dominate the radiator market by using the warranty to hold their customers hostage.

    6. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now AMD gets a monopoly on the heatsink market for AMD CPUs? What about antitrust?

    7. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by EvanED · · Score: 1

      >>As far as overclocking goes, last I checked overclocking in and of itself voided the warantee on most processors. If you want to push the thing beyond its intended limits, fine, but don't expect me to pay for it (via increased prices) if it breaks. That's like saying that my car warantee should cover the damage from driving off a cliff at 100 mph while fleeing the cops.

      That's fine. But at the same time, don't give me a product (the fan) that will break in under 8 months of use. Remember, OCing is not at all the only reason you'd need a different fan/heat sink.

    8. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      the non-standard radiator is designed for that car, then they have to honour the warranty.

      Designed by whom? If I put out a radiator, "Designed for the Ford F-150!" and you put it on your truck, and it kills your truck...why the hell should Ford pay?

      The radiator (or heatsink) maker can say whatever they like. The OEM (Ford or AMD) does not have to honor anything related to it.

    9. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Ford can prevent anyone else from making radiators for their cars. Is that how things should be?

    10. Re:Just like printer ink refills. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Then Ford can prevent anyone else from making radiators for their cars.

      No, but why should they have to clean up the mess when the 3rd party part (which may or may not have been designed correctly) craps out and eats the motor?

      It should be between the user and the 3rd party builder if anything dies.

  11. CYA by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

    gotta cover your ass, can't be too careful.

    PFY gets his hands on a new AMD processor and decides he wants to clock it 2x past where it was ever supposed to run and it dies....

    they're supposed to replace that?

    nah, they cover their butts by saying that you should only use one heatsink and one thermal paste.

    anyone with half a brain could clean off their thermal compound anyway, so who's to know?

    if you're to stupid to clean off your proc. after your overclock it, well then you should probably be using the default heatsink.

    kind of like when people ask how to enable root. if you need to ask, you shouldn't use it.

    1. Re:CYA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your comment is baffling

      all you have to do when someone asks how to 'enable root' is, "Type the necessary command and enter the root password. Duh"

    2. Re:CYA by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Concidering you need to fill the L1 bridges with superglue before you can O/C an athlonXP (to change the mult, at least), you can't just 'clean it off' if you screw up...

    3. Re:CYA by Smelly+Jeffrey · · Score: 1

      if pro is the opposite of con, then the opposite of progress would be....

      if con is the opposite of pro, then the opposite of The Constitution would be...

    4. Re:CYA by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1
      gotta cover your ass, can't be too careful.

      True, for you might end up like this.

      Now we know who we was responsible for his fate. "No grease for you!" indeed!!!
  12. Relevant info by heli0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Sucks to be you if you buy a defective AMD CPU and put a Zalman on it for the first boot"

    AMD Athlon XP(TM) Processor Thermal Solutions

    When selecting a thermal solution for your system, please refer to the following listing of heatsinks evaluated and recommended by AMD for use with AMD Athlon XP(TM) processors. Note, the following heatsinks are recommended for maintaining the specified Maximum die temperature requirement. In addition, this selection is not intended to be a comprehensive listing of all heatsinks that support AMD processors.

    From the article:
    "using a heatsink other than the stock heatsink on a retail chip also voids the warranty."

    So if you pay the $10-15 extra for the retail instead of OEM, they expect you to use the hs/fan that comes with it.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Relevant info by Lemuel · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that both of fans that come with my retail Athlons died within a year. They are lousy fans. I replaced them with approved third party fans which I hope will work much better. I suppose I could have tried warranty claims, but didn't think about it until it was too late.

    2. Re:Relevant info by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Since I got the OEM Athlon XP 2100+, that means I'm safe with Arctic Silver 3, a ThermalRight SLK-800, and a ThermalTake SmartFan 2, right? 'Cause it would kind of suck if my $50 colling equipment voided the warranty. :)

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    3. Re:Relevant info by tabby · · Score: 1

      So if I go to a "mom&pop" pc shop and they sell me an Athlon system that they put together themselves with a Zalman fan is that retail or OEM?

      --
      I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    4. Re:Relevant info by HiThere · · Score: 1

      If you got the OEM version then, I believe from reading above, your warranty is unchanged:
      NONE.

      I.e., the OEM version is not warranted by AMD.

      I could be wrong, but that's the way I read the earlier posters. If you think it might apply to you, you should probably investigate.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  13. the reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only reason they did that was because they wanted to increase their standing as a tightass quality company like intel. they dont actually expect people to use shin tzu jr on their cpu. why dont the thermal goo people start making pads anyways? they could sell them to the heatsink manufs and save us some trouble. that way we have good interface material and dont have to void the warranty. i wonder if this bullshit goes for the opteron/athlon64 too?

  14. Hmmm by LightningTH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Boycott AMD! Oh, wait, I'm already boycotting Intel for making high priced chips with high speeds that have poor performance.....CRAP!

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should open your eyes. Intel chips are no longer extremely overpriced. They also perform extremely well. Its just a different design than the low clockspeed high ipc. The overall performance is still the same.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Looks like you're stuck with Via. Decent performance, cheap price, compatible with Intel... wait, am I missing something here? Are there any downsides?

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    3. Re:Hmmm by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Ah, they are beating AMD, it's just perfermance-per-dollar that AMD is winning.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    4. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crappy performance. Think you got that one wrong.

    5. Re:Hmmm by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do they support Palladum and other restrict-what-I-can-do-to-my-PC technologies?

    6. Re:Hmmm by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      Are you okay with computers powered by Motorola chips? If not, maybe the PowerPC 970 that's supposedly coming from IBM later this year will do it for you.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    7. Re:Hmmm by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Despite the fact that DEC/Compaq/HP have claimed that they are dying for the past decade, Alpha processors still kick the ass of everything else. The #2 & #3 fastest supercomputers in the world are Alpha systems.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always the Via C3. :)

    9. Re:Hmmm by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Intel chips are no longer extremely overpriced.

      They aren't?

      Could have fooled me.

      Barton XP3000+ 512M L2 Cache, 333Mhz (2.17 Ghz ) $509.00
      P4 3.06G 478 Pin 533MHz FSB (Retail box) $949.00

      So, an 86% difference in price means nothing, right? I mean, $440 is just pocket change!

      You're very, very, VERY wrong. You want more comparisons to show how people buying intel are wasting their money?

      How about the $139 all-in-one Athlon 1.3 Ghz motherboard (CPU soldered on with fan, with Video, LAN, sound, etc) I bought the other day? Can you find me the intel equivalent?

      Oh wait, intel's CHIPSET almost costs that much. I forgot.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Hmmm by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

      Well, there is always the Via C3 (formerly Cyrix)...

    11. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap? Does that mean you've already boycotted SGI, Sun, motorola(many lines, included for PDAs), DEC/Compaq/alpha, Via/Cyrix, IBM, and anyone whom I've left out?

      And hey, if you're Boycotting Apple, you can still get an Amiga running the same PowerPC chips...

    12. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm already boycotting Sun because of their overpriced workstations and slow processors. I'm also boycotting Apple and the PowerPC lineup because they're equally slow compared to the x86 lineup. That just leaves Via processors which are slow too. FUCK. Time to go back to a P4 I guess.

    13. Re:Hmmm by gamorck · · Score: 1

      You sir are an idiot. Please try to choose a respectable site when comparing CPU prices. For instance check out Sharkys Extreme:

      http://www.sharkyextreme.com/guides/WCPG/article .p hp/10705_2196091__3

      P4 3.06 ghz 533mhz/478 pin = $390
      Athlon XP 3000+ = $324

      So would you like to retract your statement or would you like me continue kicking that dumb ass of yours?

      J

      --
      I love idealists not because I am one, but because they make life bearable for pragmatists such as myself.
    14. Re:Hmmm by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Well, you could buy a Mac.

      With my last system, I went Intel because I had no faith in the AMD heat sink mounting. For one, too many people have been cracking their cores for my comfort, AMD left off the heat spreader plate that would have protected it. I think that was a cost cutting move.

      Another thing is the _two_ little plastic prongs holding a paperclip that hold a heavy heatsink doesn't inspire any confidence. It worked for socket 7 chips but those heat sinks weren't half as heavy and the CPU die wasn't so exposed.

      Really, I prefer a secure bolt-on heat sink mounting system, P4 isn't as strong as those in the past, such as my Xeon and Alpha processors, but it looks a lot stronger than the Athlon XP method.

      I did hear from an AMD rep that the Hammer CPUs will have a better mouning method than the Athlon XP, from pictures of such boards it looks like a good improvement.

      And I did price out comparible P4 and Athlon systems, at the time it was dead even, feature for feature for the same performance. I figured I didn't want anything to do with buying such a flimsy mechanical design.

    15. Re:Hmmm by HiThere · · Score: 1

      This illustrates the fallacy of boycotts (from the perspective of an individual).

      May I suggest an alternative. I keep a list of companies that have displeased me, and require that they produce better goods than the competition before I will purchase them. Currently Intel is under a 10% cost/performance penalty vs. AMD as a cumulative result of several of their actions, but it would be quite reasonable for each person to maintain their own list with their own relative weights for various actions...how much to you want to fine Intel for sending a security consultant that they employed to jail for telling them about an insecure system that he wasn't officially charged with oversight on? Clearly this is a judgement call. But with this system companies can be balanced against each other (so far I only do this informally, but if I wanted to implement a time decay on the penalty I'd probably need to write a program to keep track).

      A slightly different tack is needed when monopolies are involved. MPAA is currently under a 100% penalty: I won't go to see a movie that is in any way associated with them without first donating a cost equal to the ticket price to the EFF. (It seems to me the appropriate group. You could pick another...say some independant film studio.) The RIAA is also up to the 100% level, but I haven't found any reason to purchase any of their materials, so I haven't decided on the group to donate to. But if the group is a monopoly, then you should donate to a group opposing that monopoly.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:Hmmm by shepd · · Score: 1

      >So would you like to retract your statement or would you like me continue kicking that dumb ass of yours?

      ??? You post a site which verifies that intel charges more, and you expect me to retract my statement?

      This place is full of more whackos than I thought.

      >Please try to choose a respectable site when comparing CPU prices.

      So, a site that advertises a similar price on CPUs as sharky's, that anybody in my city who deals with computers knows about, that isn't respectable?

      Well, clearly your idea of respectable and mine are different.

      In fact, I am sure we differ on a great many things, like, for example, what the idea of costs less is. Usually less (by definition) means a lower amount.

      You really have me wondering what drugs you're smoking.

      I'd add you to my foes list, but perhaps you can explain what the hell you're talking about instead.

      Oh, and learn to use A HREF, most especially when you're going to call others unrespectable. That verifies that you are a dumbass.

      Last, but certainly not least, AT A MINIMUM, compare the prices from the same store for crying out loud!

      Since you didn't, let me post the prices of both CPUs from the two stores you mentioned:

      Monarch:
      Athlon XP 3000+ = $324 (!!! LIMIT ONE PER CUSTOMER !!!) <--- CLEARLY Indicates price dumping, or REALLY poor stock, either way, a VERY bad sign.
      Intel P4 478 3.0 GHz (HT) 512K 533 FSB (Retail Box-w-fan) = $386 (Sharky's is so respectable they missed this. Really makes me want to trust them! NOT)
      Intel P4 478 3.00 GHz 800 FSB (Retail Box-w-fan) = $549.00 (!!! LIMIT ONE PER CUSTOMER !!!) <--- CLEARLY Indicates price dumping, or REALLY poor stock, either way, a VERY bad sign.

      Okay, so Monarch (aside their crappy supply schemes) has similar pricing. Of course, you pay in the fact that they'll only sell you one. Which is really, really, really lame and disrespectable. At least the store *I* linked to would sell you as many as you wanted.

      So, Newegg is the other retailer. Let's see how they match up. Hopefully their "big name" status will

      Yikes! Sharky, your "reputable" source is wrong again with the prices.

      I'll list the real prices instead of the lies Sharky is trying to spread.

      Intel Pentium 4 / 3.0GHz 512k socket 478 Hyper Threading Technology 800 MHz FSB - RETAIL = $545.00 (!!! LIMIT ONE PER CUSTOMER !!!) <--- CLEARLY Indicates price dumping, or REALLY poor stock, either way, a VERY bad sign.
      Intel Pentium 4 / 3.06GHz 512k 478 Pin Processor HT Technology 533 MHz FSB Retail ETA 4/20/03 = $384.00 (!!! LIMIT FIVE PER CUSTOMER !!!) <--- Seems that Newegg has serious inventory issues. Perhaps they need a stock manager?
      AMD ATHLON XP 3000 "Barton" 333 FSB PROCESSOR CPU- RETAIL = $326.00 (!!! LIMIT FIVE PER CUSTOMER !!!) <--- Seems that Newegg has serious inventory issues. Perhaps they need a stock manager?

      But don't let that stop your blind devotion to intel's high prices and inability to provide stock!

      And, let's not forget the (for us Canadians) week of wait

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  15. what bullshit by Indy1 · · Score: 1

    first of all, i've seen quite a few systems that use
    just the heatsink and the crappy thermal pad on the heat sink with no grease, and they overheat easily.

    On the 100+ machines (all amd) i've built for clients (including a pile of rack mounted servers), i've always removed the worthless thermal pad, and used artic silver III, and i've NEVER had a overheating problem.

    This is one recommendation from the manufacter i'd encourage everyone to ignore. Instead, read the overclocker sites for how to properly cool your cpus. I dont overclock myself, but i think the oc'ers have a good handle on cooling.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  16. Funny ... by sparkie · · Score: 1

    AMD used to require heatsink compound / thermal paste / thermal grease / whatever it's called these days.

  17. Shuttle owners and other custom owners screwed? by Drakino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Shuttle SN41G2 requires a user to not use the AMD heatsink, as the box comes with a custom heatpipe to get the heat from the CPU away from the chip, and the insides of the system. Using the AMD heatsink could lead to the system building up too much heat internally, and causing the box to shut down or crash. I'm sure AMD processors are also used in similar custom machines.

    Why is it the consumers fault AMD never integrated thermal protection or a heat spreader into their processors to protect them? Personally, I'm glad I have a P4 in my gaming box that won't fry its self if a fan dies.

    1. Re:Shuttle owners and other custom owners screwed? by Airconditioning · · Score: 1

      My old Duron survived quite well after the CPU fan failed. Took me half an hour to figure out why my machine was acting so strange and it was running approximately 90 degrees celcius the whole time. Still works now with a new fan.

  18. i suggest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using KY jelly as a lubricant. it makes things run much more sexually, and reduces friction.

  19. I'm sorry AMD, but I'm dumping you for Intel. by Xenkar · · Score: 2

    When I received my AthlonXP 2400+ retail box, the heatsink was missing the covering for the adhesive pad. I had two options: Return it and pay a shitload of shipping and wait a week or two, or get thermal grease. I went with the thermal grease. I think I'll go back to Intel when I have to upgrade again.

    Someone should force AMD execs to sleep in a room with a stock fan/heatsink and see how they like it. I get terrible nightmares if I actually manage to fall asleep from the loud roar.

    1. Re:I'm sorry AMD, but I'm dumping you for Intel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, for as long as I can remember I can't get to sleep unless I have 2 or 3 noisy CPU/PSU fans running. Silence drives me mad.

    2. Re:I'm sorry AMD, but I'm dumping you for Intel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus fucking Christ. It's a $100 CPU. If it fries it fries for god's sake. You people are such cheapskates. The reason you buy a commodity sub-$100 CPU is because it's cheap! If you want quality then you'd be buying a $500 P4 CPU from Intel. Since I'm cheap I buy an $80 AMD Athlon. Quit complaining and use whatever the hell you want on it. If it dies, boo hoo, go buy another one. Just try it for a few hours with the custom heatsink and fan. And pray tell, how does a RETAIL BOX come without the right shit? You should have returned it. It was probably a system pull.

    3. Re:I'm sorry AMD, but I'm dumping you for Intel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for me...

  20. Thermal pumpout? by Smallpond · · Score: 1

    I've been in the electronics industry a long time and have never heard of this phrase. Google hasn't heard it either. I think it was a phrase made up on the spot to impress or intimidate us, like "quantum singularity" or "weapons of mass destruction".

    1. Re:Thermal pumpout? by Meowing · · Score: 1

      It's legit. Try the search as thermal pump-out (with the hyphen) and you'll find plenty of references.

    2. Re:Thermal pumpout? by eclectro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, you learn something new everyday. I've been in electronics for ages and never heard of it before too.

      After doing a little research, it refers to the migration or "pump out" of the grease due to the pressure of the heatsink on the chip and the thermal cycles of turning your cpu off/on. Because the cpu and heatsink are usually different materials they will expand/contract at different rates, and thus will "push out" the grease.

      Then this might create a space between the cpu and heatsink with the "pumped out" grease acting as a standoff, essentially leaving your cpu without meaningful contact with a heatsink. With AMD cpus that normally run very hot, this is deadly and your cpu will melt.

      Thermal Insulating Materials, or TIMs have a much higher viscosity than grease, so that won't happen with them. Though arguably they don't do as well as grease (in the short term) in the thermal transfer of heat.

      On the surface this seems like a conspiracy by those who make TIMs, but one user observed "pump out" for himself - using Artic Silver too.

      If the AMD cpus had a heat spreader on them like many intel cpus do, "pump out" may not be so bad. Though it probably would happen to some degree, it probably would not be fatal.

      Given the vast quantity of cpus that AMD (and intel for that matter) crank out, they probably see a steady stream of cpus burned out with grease on them been returned to them. So naturally they want to cut there losses and want people to stick with TIMs to prevent burn out.

      It also could be argued that the socket A design is inherently flawed. Thermal grease as commonly known was not designed to operate under the high pressures that heatsink clamps put on cpus these days.

      I have always dissed TIMs, but now I'll give it a second thought.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  21. Arctic Silver's Flawed Analogy by dmadole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those who bothered to read the article would have found this little gem of a quote from Arctic Silver at the end:

    Look at it this way, if you applied the same criteria to selecting a car, everyone would be driving a low power, fuel efficient station wagon with rain tires and foot-thick rubber bumpers all the way around.

    Yeah, and anyone who takes their under-warranty low power, fuel efficient car and replaces the radiator with an unapproved aftermarket part, and replaces the coolant with something that doesn't meet manufacturer requirements, probably won't get warranty service, either!

    1. Re:Arctic Silver's Flawed Analogy by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yeah, and anyone who takes their under-warranty low power, fuel efficient car and replaces the radiator with an unapproved aftermarket part, and replaces the coolant with something that doesn't meet manufacturer requirements, probably won't get warranty service, either!

      Actually, your example is true. Japanese automakers will not warranty engines that have had silicate-based antifreeze put in them. German cars typically don't allow phosphate-based coolant.

      Why? Because silicates cause increased wear on moving parts, like water pumps. Water pumps are very often driven by the timing belt. When the water pump seizes, it usually shreds the belt in a matter of seconds, and if the engine is an interference type(ie, the path of pistons and valves overlap, but never hit because of the timing), then you'll bend/snap valves, or worse.

      Phosphates don't react well to water with mineral content(US coolant makers claim it's only a european-water problem, that the US doesn't have "high mineral content" in its water, which is bullshit), aren't friendly with aluminum engine components/radiators, and like silicates, they work by coating all the metal with the stuff(on the theory that, if a metal that can rust is covered by phosphates or silicates, it won't rust.)

      I use the proper coolant that was recommended by my car's manufacturer- it's german-made, and doesn't contain either phosphates or silicates. I've actually seen better operation(less noise from the water pump, for one) since I switched.

      The reality is that if you substitute coolants, and your engine overheats because of it- you're shit out of luck. That said, the manufacturer has to prove(to a certain extent) that your coolant switch caused the problem(which could be as simple as "see this pump? It seized because you used crap coolant.") Auto manufacturers can't just declare the whole vehicle's warranty invalid because, say, you install a non-OEM air filter.

      Maybe it's just me, but computer manufacturers have clung to the "open the case, void the warranty" bullshit. Some invalidate the warranty because you installed, say, a network or faxmodem card. That's bull- just like auto companies, they should be forced to prove the non-OEM component caused the failure.

    2. Re:Arctic Silver's Flawed Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you buy any car that the engine timing is ran by a belt with the accessories on it, you were very stupid.
      only the utmost in crappy design would do that. ALL jap cars I have seen (over 100 under the hood and up to my elbows in grime) have a seperate timing belt or timing gears.

      only a complete moron would put the timing belt on to drive an alternator or water pump.

    3. Re:Arctic Silver's Flawed Analogy by jeff_bond · · Score: 1
      only a complete moron would put the timing belt on to drive an alternator or water pump

      Plenty of car engines use the timing belt to drive the water pump. For example Ford CVH and Zetec, Vauxhall J series. It is a bit dodgy because it is not unknown for water pumps to seize up and strip off the belt teeth.

      Jeff

      --
      stty erase ^H
    4. Re:Arctic Silver's Flawed Analogy by Icculus · · Score: 1

      Water pumps are very often driven by the timing belt.

      I have never seen this in any American, French, German, or Japanese car that I've owned. In every case the water pump was driven by a serpentine or V belt off the crank pulley. The timing belt or chain is almost always a dedicated part underneath some sort of shield and totally separate from the accessory belt that drives your alternator, air conditioner compressor, power steering, etc.

    5. Re:Arctic Silver's Flawed Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm lets see--these are the cars I've seen with a timing belt/chain driven water pump this year alone:

      Ford Escort 1.9l
      ALL Honda Civic/Prelude 4cyl engines
      Chrysler LHS 3.5 V6

      All all cases, the waterpump is simply a casted piece of aluminum with a timing belt pully on one side and the impeller on the other. The pump bolts flush to the block BEHIND the timing belt path and covers. Usually when you change your timing belt at 100K or whatever the recommended time is, it's a good idea to change the water pump as well--just in case. Most higher quality aftermarket water pumps are only like $25 at Autozone/PepBoys anyway.

      Water pumps will always make some kind of bearing noise and usually start to leak before they cause serious problems. If ignored, it could cause the timing belt to skip.

  22. Re:I really am quite astonished by Benley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry to interrupt you tirade, but has it occurred to you that overclocking probably also voids the warranty regardless of what heatsink you're using? Just a thought, you know...

  23. Re:I really am quite astonished by Talez · · Score: 1

    I'm astonished that there's any kind of warranty for broken/melted cores at all.

    I've got an Athlon 1GHz. I'm still using the stock HSF and it hovers around 65 degrees celcius in the winter. During a summer day my core can hit nearly 80 degrees.

    Now I know the core is rated to go to 105 degrees but if my core melted while running at 80 degrees I'd expect it to be replaced for an Athlon that does run properly at up to 105 degrees.

  24. Re:How is this reasonable: For repair shops? by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

    This makes it more of a pain for repair shops too though. Imagine having to stock certain fans [and I assume by heatsinks, they mean fans too], for the odd case of AMD that needs it or no warantee for the customer?

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
  25. This is an example of misunderstanding by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 3, Informative

    Didn't any of you notice that they only specifically said that Arctic Silver will void your warranty? The reason for this is that Arctic Silver is a Thermal EPOXY... While the text of the article also points out that they don't like the "conductive properties" of (obviously) the minute ammount of silver in it, they also on their "green-list" had a thermal greese that does have minute ammounts of silver. I do not think they are trying to dictate what you use, beyond trying to keep idiots from costing them needlesly large ammounts of money. Face it, just about everyone in the world thinks they know enough to set up a computer, but when they do it, they will completely forget the HS/FAN or use too much thermal greese to the point where it's minute conductive properties cause shorts... It is the idiots they are after, not us... give them a break!

    --
    Erutangis ym si siht.
    1. Re:This is an example of misunderstanding by kjd · · Score: 1

      Arctic Silver produces a thermal adhesive, but they produce thermal compounds as well.

    2. Re:This is an example of misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't informative, it's incorrect. mod it down, please.

    3. Re:This is an example of misunderstanding by Guilly · · Score: 1

      It is the idiots they are after, not us... give them a break!

      First, please, get your facts straight before you tell the legions of kids building their computers here that arctic silver is an epoxy. there's the thermal paste AND the epoxy. You don't use epoxy on your cpu.

      Second, if you use too much paste, you shouldn't cause any shorts since the die is really far away from anything, unless you put a whole tube on the die. The processor will likely just catch in fire ;)

      Third, please moderators, stop modding up stuff that you have no clue about just because it sounds smart to you. This post is fscking score:5 and doesn't even have the correct facts.

    4. Re:This is an example of misunderstanding by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Do you read slashdot?
      Most of these people (myself included) are Idiots who break computer shit by not reading the directions (or taking risky shortcuts) when they're trying to put things together.
      Like, for instance, trying to mount/unmount HSFs, on anything other than a workbench... (sure to crack the chip or scratch the board when that screwdriver slips)
      We're the geek equivalents of tim 'the tool man' taylor. augh augh. More power, no patience to do things right! (and hense idiots)
      I'm inordinately lucky that I've only cracked a single athlon chip and melted 0, out of 12 or so installed, and at least 9 of those were done in less than ideal conditions (eg: mounting after the board is secured in the case etc.)
      I'm so lucky that I once sucessfully mounted an athlon chip while the case was upright, and I was lying on the floor, with only a flashlight shining up on the HSF so I could see what I was doing. It didn't crack even though it took me three attempts to get the hook to latch.
      The one chip I did crack still worked after cracking, too, it just ran 3 degrees C hotter. Although I did do the right thing and replace the chip, since you never know how long that cracked chip will continue working.
      I also find it interesting that Intel caters to the people who think they can do everything (by selling metal capped CPUs) that on an intel approved motherboard won't POST if the CPU lacks a HS, and won't run full speed without a fan.

  26. Re:I really am quite astonished by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Huh? You're going to sue AMD if you overclock and your CPU fails? I'm astonished too.

    If Intel still provides warranty under these conditions then if I'm AMD I'd off-the-record recommend you use Intel. Doh.

    If anyone is the overclocking type, they should be willing to put in a few extra hours. First test with standard boxed CPU heatsink+fan. I system works for a day (memtest86), then change to desired heatsink+fan.

    If you bought an expensive heatsink and fan and your CPU dies after running fine on standard cooling kit, then either you screwed up or you've been cheated by the heatsink/fan manufacturer/supplier.

    --
  27. Re:I really am quite astonished by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

    especially since overclocking already voids the warrant and all.

    there is a warranty for broken/melted cores because sometimes fans fail to cool, even during normal use. Trust me, if your proc ever dies, you'll be glad for that warranty

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
  28. You are correct. by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They can't *prevent* you from doing it.....

    Any warrantee beyond the implied one usually required by law (fitness for a particular purpose, etc) is OPTIONAL, and they don't have to offer one at all; and if they DO, it can be under whatever terms they like.

    So... if you take it home and it's busted out of the box, yeah, they have to do something about it.. because that's the law.

    IF it breaks in six months, but had a 12 month guarantee on it saying you had to use the original cooler.. and you used another one, why should they honor it?

  29. Perpective. by SN74S181 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have my folks here visiting right now from out of state. I decided to peek in and see what's cooking on Slashdot nonetheless.

    Now, if I were to go in the other room and tell my folks that people were ranting and raving on a website about no being allowed to use the heat sink grease of their choice on a computer processor..... Well, regular down to earth real people just wouldn't understand.

    1. Re:Perpective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandma: "Well, I never knew computers were into that sort of thing! Takes all kinds..."

    2. Re:Perpective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My folks didn't understand the 'real world', until their plant closed and they are out of work with NO prospect of finding work.

      Flex Tech my ass.

      I'm not getting a peep out of them about work now, but I'm making more the both of the two louts put together.

    3. Re:Perpective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you, but if your job involves applying thermal paste to CPUs, your outlook ain't that great either.

    4. Re:Perpective. by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Now, if I were to go in the other room and tell my folks that people were ranting and raving on a website about no being allowed to use the heat sink grease of their choice on a computer processor..... Well, regular down to earth real people just wouldn't understand.

      That's funny, because myself, being quite the geek, don't understand when my mother talks about the proper methods of filing a T4 or the odd things people do when it comes time for quarterly reports or when people rant and rave about missing lunch hour at month's end. When my brother in law talks about using six-penny nails when a brad nailer is more appropriate, or running the wrong kind of hydraulic fluid in a bailer, or ...

      To them, it's a big deal. To their colleagues, it's topical and interesting; often even a topic of great heated discourse over a ${BEVERAGE}. Everybody's career / hobby has its own set of idiosyncrasies (and esoteric dialog). In that regard, we're not unique or unusual. Really.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    5. Re:Perpective. by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because myself, being quite the geek, don't understand when my mother talks about the proper methods of filing a T4 or the odd things people do when it comes time for quarterly reports or when people rant and rave about missing lunch hour at month's end. When my brother in law talks about using six-penny nails when a brad nailer is more appropriate, or running the wrong kind of hydraulic fluid in a bailer, or ...

      That sounds more like employment vs. unemployment to me. :)

  30. OT: Cooler reviews by yem · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ultimate cooler review site: http://www.dansdata.com/coolercomp.htm

    Just a good one to bookmark :-)

    --
    No, I did not read the f***ing article!
  31. Re:I really am quite astonished by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 3, Funny

    WHAT? Are you suggesting that pushing your hardware to dangerous limits it wasn't intended to operate at is NOT condoned by companies? Furthermore, are you even suggesting that after my overclocked system dies, AMD won't happily shell over a new proc? LUDICROUS! How dare you spread such lies!
    (ps: the above was an attempt at humor)

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
  32. AMD can blow me. by Sauron23 · · Score: 0

    fuck'em

    1. Re:AMD can blow me. by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

      Dude, seriously, fix the quote

    2. Re:AMD can blow me. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Love is the Law, Love under Will.

      Had to be said, screw the bad karma for posting off topic! ;)

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:AMD can blow me. by bloxnet · · Score: 1

      I am sure they will....provided you are not expecting them to use thermal grease or third party fans.

  33. So what? by extrarice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see a problem with this. AMD will only guarantee its equipment with parts they provide. Use your own parts, and you're responsible for damage. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

    --
    "Jesus saves, but everyone else in a 10 foot radius takes full damage from the fireball."
    1. Re:So what? by dago · · Score: 1

      Your new $FAVOURITE_CAR_MAKER was provided with $STANDARD_BRAND tires. You are not able to change them. And, btw, you are only allowed to put $OIL_COMPANY fuel in it.

      Sound still perfectly reasonable ?

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    2. Re:So what? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Like somebody else said, that's a bad analogy. It's more like replacing the radiator with your new Zalman radiator, it not being hooked up correctly causing your engine to fry and YOU demanding your engine be replaced under the original manufacturer's warranty. Wait until the warranty is up and then start putting your custom shit on it like everyone else. For example, if you bought a TiVo would you crack it open on day 1 to replace the hard disks with larger ones and thus void your warranty? Probably huh?

    3. Re:So what? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "I don't see a problem with this. AMD will only guarantee its equipment with parts they provide. Use your own parts, and you're responsible for damage. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me."

      Sorry, I can't replace those shoes that've fallen to pieces after a week -- you were wearing a nike T-shirt, so it voided the warranty.

  34. so, by your logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if I, for instance, cover the processor in oil, or rather, specially created oil for use with AMD CPUS, and "somehow" my processor dies, they should have to replace? Most(the VAST majority) of the time a processor dies, it's because people are either A. Idiots, or B. Overclocking, etc. AMD should not have to pay for people if they put an underpowered heatsink on a processor, or coat it in a pint of thermal grease. They're not saying "We will hunt you down if you use a different heatsink", all they are doing is saying "If it dies, we aint paying".

  35. Hmm...oh yea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed last time I did you. Slid right in, and I could hardly hear you with your face shoved in a pillow.

  36. doesn't make a difference here by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with OEM status, this has to do with voiding your warranty through improper usage. If you hook up the wrong battery to your car and it dies, you're not eligible for warranty service. Same here -- don't use the heatsink that comes with it, and it's your problem if it dies.

    1. Re:doesn't make a difference here by WNight · · Score: 1

      That's only valid if the after-market parts you buy are really the problem. The car companies would like to disclaim all warranties on cars that use third-party tires but unless the tire quality actually caused the problem, they can't.

      If you put a 486 fan on an Athlon and it died, you're unprotected. If you exercise due care and buy an Athlon-rated fan and the CPU dies for some other reason, AMD is liable for it, if it's in the warranty period. They can try to get around this by not certifying any fans for new CPUs but any judge would throw that out after seeing the cooler benchmarks you find on the hardware sites, that show how after-market CPU HSFs perform better.

  37. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last summer, me and a friend built a computer using an amd athlon xp, after using thermal grease and a standard fan, we noticed the computer kept overheating insanely (nearly 90c with 5 fans running = bad). Anyways, we decided to return the cpu, covered in grease, back to the local fry's. Of course they don't accept cpu's covered in thermal grease, so we went to the k-mart next door, bought some rubbing alcohol and q-tips, and spent nearly an hour trying to get rid of the thermal grease. Needless to say, by the time most was off, the serial number on the cpu had been taken off, so the worker bee at Fry's had to stick it in their little test motherboard to see that it actually ran at 2.2Ghz of death.

    This whole issue is just AMD's way to get out of making poor-quality processors (at least as of last summer).

  38. Bull by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1
    This seems silly. Thermal grease (at least the "popular" brands - I have never used the cheap stuff) cause no adverse effects to your CPU. I accidentally put globs of the shit on two of my previous CPUs (a Pentium 3 800mhz that I clocked to 900mhz, and an Athlon XP 1800 that I got to like 1753mhz, I can't remember) and it didn't do squat. I used the P3 like that for 2 years, and the XP 1800 for about 6 months.

    *** As a side note, I contacted AMD tech support concerning thermal grease and got an answer just three days ago, and the support rep was the person that told me to just use a "smidgeon" (his word for "a tiny bit"). This absurd decree is coming from high up in marketing somewhere, not from the actual "know people". At least that's my guess. I would copy and paste the email, but I'm not sure how they would react, and my employer has a nice partnership with AMD, so.......

    1. Re:Bull by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I would copy and paste the email, but I'm not sure how they would react, and my employer has a nice partnership with AMD, so.......
      The AC feature has other uses than for trolling.
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So getting lucky a few times now constitues a right express an authoritative view which is the exact opposite of what many other, much smarter, much more experienced people, say?!

  39. Don't know what you're doing wrong... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    ...but I haven't had to resort to any third party HSF units for any of the AMD systems I've built so far.

    I find the stock HSFs to be more than enough to keep all of my systems running within normal temps, and they're not as noisy as some (most) aftermarket fans.

    Sounds like you've got some bad air flow management going on in your cases. That's the only time I've ever seen an AMD proc with stock HSF run hot.

    Everyone's mileage will vary. I think if AMD takes a hard stand against processor abuse, it'll ultimately drive down their prices.

    Compute responsibly.

    1. Re:Don't know what you're doing wrong... by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      I have used the retail HSF in the past with no probs, i just ditch that crappy thermal pad. When i've had to fix over heating machines, its been people who purchased some box at a local screwdriver shop.

      In any case, i find the third party HSF's to be more suited to my tastes. I can get quality copper HSF's for 15 or so. Usually the retail chips are 20-30 more then the oem's, so i save money and get a better fan in any case.

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  40. Grease? Feh. TIM pads, baby! by willith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've installed my last three heatsinks, including my current Zalman CNPS6000AlCu, with pink TIM wax pads. TIM pads are cheap, neat, and don't require you to get crap all over your hands during application. I'll never go back to the goop game.

    Since it doesn't make a difference what the hell you use to stick your heatsink onto your CPU--hell, toothpaste works just as well as AS-3--I'll stick with the easy stuff.

  41. Here's an idea... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    Shut off your computer at night.

    1. Re:Here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shut off your computer at night

      What, and save energy? You, sir, are positively un-American. To quote some dumbass republican party bullshit artist that was on Politically Incorrect a few years ago, "It's my right as an American to waste as much energy as I want to!"

      It amazes me how many people use computers 8 hours x 5 days but leave them running 24 hours x 7 days. And don't anybody give me that inrush current/ component stress bullshit. I'm an electronics engineer of 15+ years and can tell you that the argument is total bullshit and probably devised by Enron employees.

    2. Re:Here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an EE? From where? Why are you AC?

    3. Re:Here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm an electronics engineer of 15+ years and can tell you that the argument is total bullshit and probably devised by Enron employees.

      Then you, sir, need to be stripped of your license. You clearly don't have the requirements to be an EE. I'm not, and even I can see that you shouldn't be.

      Why don't you talk to some of those TV/VCR repair guys that know more than you. You'll find that over time:

      - Moving parts sieze up (motors, relays, etc)
      - Capacitors, etc, lose their ability to function when cool, due to drying out
      - PCB traces crack due to heat stress, and only match up when warm (equipment left on).

      Leaving the equipment on keeps the parts warmer, letting them work past their intended lifespan. Once the equipment is shut off, the parts cool, and often sieze, rendering the equipment broken and in a repair shop where the TV/VCR repair guy is more than happy to take your $100 to put a new set of caps and moving parts inside.

      Ask ANYBODY who has been even a sysadmin for more than a few years what has happened when they've tried to boot a (now broken) old server that's gotten cold after a power outage.

      Oh SHIT! HDDs don't spin up, fans sound like they're about to fly apart, cards not in their sockets properly, etc, etc.

  42. BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From m-w.com (highlighting MINE):

    One entry found for irregardless.

    Main Entry: irregardless
    Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
    Function: adverb
    Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
    Date: circa 1912
    nonstandard : REGARDLESS
    usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.

    My comment on yours: :-P

    1. Re:BULLSHIT by curtlewis · · Score: 1

      more on irregardless: irregardless adv : in spite of everything; without regard to drawbacks; "he carried on regardless of the difficulties" [syn: regardless, irrespective, disregardless, no matter, disregarding] Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University Sounds like a word to me. And what defines a word? Something that is in common use in the language, which 'irregardless' is. It is therefore, by definition, a word.

  43. The prblem with dumping AMD.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The prblem with dumping AMD is that the only alternative is Intel, who sells their lackluster-performing chips at inflated prices. My Athlon XP CPU is about $30 cheaper then the closest Intel Pentium offering, and performs much better. So what if it's loud and hot.

  44. What do we do now? by Sayten241 · · Score: 1

    /.'ers can't like Intel, and if we can't like AMD either, what kind of processors will we use? =P

    1. Re:What do we do now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dragons? VIA's?

    2. Re:What do we do now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transmeta. Chinese Dragon? PowerPC?

    3. Re:What do we do now? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Motorola? IBM?

      Linux runs on PowerPCs, you know.

      (Quite well on a Dual 1.42GHz G4, or so I've been told.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  45. AMD by AlgUSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am one of those people who assemble a PC, and don't touch it except to clean it out. I bought a retail AMD processor applied the HS/Fan that came with it, and have never had to take it off.

    AMD only warranties RETAIL CPUs, OEM CPUs are usually warrantied by the retailer, usually if you buy a HS/Fan from them. So, if you buy OEM CPUs this doesn't apply to you. If you intend on using arctic silver / Zalman, then buy a OEM CPU (tcwo.com warrants them for a year with a HS/Fan purchase). If you want your warranty backed by AMD, buy a Retail procassor and use the included HS/Fan.

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    1. Re:AMD by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      Almost all OEM components are warrantied by their respective original manufacturers - it is required by law in many jurisdictions. The fact that distributors/retailers may offer their own warranty does not change that - when you ship the part to the retailer and it is not a trivial problem, the retailer ships it to the original manufacturer.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:AMD by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      If you are right (which you aren't), then abide by their warranty rules or lose it? If you don't like their rules, buy a CPU from somewhere like tcwo.com which gives you a retailer's warranty for a year with a HS/Fan purchase.

      I know for a fact that AMD doesn't have a warranty for OEM CPUs. I don't know about where you live, but I live in Florida, and that is perfectly legal here!

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    3. Re:AMD by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      Like I said: you are wrong. You may be under the impression that AMD does not honor warranty requests for OEM parts, but they do, because they are obligated to. No one except AMD can service these parts. Retailers usually have no clue on how to service parts - they just send them along to the OEM (in this case, AMD). This does not particularly depend on the state you are in - the OEM (especially a very high-profile OEM like AMD) cannot refuse to honor warranty on non-retail-packaged items at least in some jurisdictions, and for most purposes, you cannot distinguish between items bought in different jurisdictions, and - more importantly - you cannot distinguish between a retailer and an end user, because most of these retailers are not on the distributor/partner list. Again, if you buy an OEM-packaged CPU and it breaks while you are abiding by warranty (I said nothing about the hs/fan problem) you can call AMD and demand warranty service, and if the part number indicates that it is under warranty period, they cannot refuse.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    4. Re:AMD by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Naive you. Do you think that AMD "services" processors? When they recieve them, if defective, the just huck them in the trash (or recycle bin). Exactly how do you service a processor, if something goes wrong with the die, it is unserviceable. If something goes wrong with the packaging, it is more expensive to fix than the processor is worth.

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    5. Re:AMD by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      According to AMD's warranty site:

      AMD only provides a warranty on its line of boxed processors

      http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalRes ou rces/0,,30_182_867,00.html

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    6. Re:AMD by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      It looks like I stand corrected on this one :)

      True, processors can't be serviced. A lot of various other parts like various cards and drives are not serviced either - they're just salvaged for parts, while the user is sent a new unit. And there are no parts to salvage from a dead CPU.

      It looks like the failure rate of the CPUs is so low (as it has to be) that AMD doesn't care if it pisses off the people who buy OEM CPUs and they break. It would not be a good way to improve customer satisfaction otherwise...

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  46. let me explain the problem by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Informative
    AMD doesn't want to be responsible for people using too weak of heatsink/fans or too much thermal grease. What is the problem here?

    Let me explain the problem with a simple example. And this has nothing to do with those who want to overclock their CPU or otherwise soup up their system.

    The fan on the "stock heatsink" they talk about is less than quiet, but more importantly is poor enough that in many cases it will not even last the life of the warranty on the CPU. And the phase change material is "one use", you can't remove the heat sink and reapply it again with the same strip of heat sink material and have it function properly. When my heat sink fan died some months after I started using it (as detected by the BIOS seeing it slowing down considerably and a reelated increase in CPU temperature), I went to the local CompUSA and got a replacement copper fan. The "stock heatsink" just isn't always available. The replacement heatsink does a far better job, but I had to use a non-conductive thermal grease to install it. By this proclimation, I would have voided my warranty in two ways, using thermal grease and a better but non-standard heat sink.

    I much prefer AMD over Intel, but if AMD is going to do this they need to consider some real world situations. As far as I know they don't warranty the heatsink fan, and even if they were to start it would not be reasonable for them to expect a user to not use their computer for the time it takes to ship back a bad fan and get a replacement. If they were supplying a fan and heatsink that would never need replacement, they might be on a more moral high ground, but having a stock fan that dies easily and then claiming you void the warranty if you correctly replace the heat sink isn't user friendly. And, of course, there are some people wo have a problem with the noise the stock fan makes, and while the argument is not as strong as the one I just made, I think they should be able to replace the stock haetsink and fan with a quieter one if they want, as long as they follow good technical procedures. I certainly don't have a problem with AMD stating they will not be responsiable for problems caused by conductive thermal grease, but this policy does seem to go too far, particularly given the fan they supply on that heatsink.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:let me explain the problem by EvanED · · Score: 1

      >>The fan on the "stock heatsink" they talk about is less than quiet, but more importantly is poor enough that in many cases it will not even last the life of the warranty on the CPU.

      Mine died completely a couple weeks ago, after under 8 months of use. It's been malfunctioning for a couple months.

    2. Re:let me explain the problem by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fan on the "stock heatsink" they talk about is less than quiet, but more importantly is poor enough that in many cases it will not even last the life of the warranty on the CPU.

      Ummmm...lets think about this for a minute. The fan fails while under warranty. The whole point of a warranty is to cover failures within the warranty period. You don't want to make a warranty claim and would rather resolve the problem yourself without involving the manufacturer. I don't see the problem here, as it sounds to me like you have no interest in invoking the warranty.

    3. Re:let me explain the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As far as I know they don't warranty the heatsink fan

      If it's sold as a single unit, it's under warranty as a single unit.

      it would not be reasonable for them to expect a user to not use their computer for the time it takes to ship back a bad fan and get a replacement.

      Think about what you are saying. It happens all the time with faulty cpus - why would another component of the same package failing be different? "It would not be reasonable ... to ship back a bad cpu"?

    4. Re:let me explain the problem by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      whoa... déjà vu. Have you posted about this before? Not recently, but like, a year ago or something?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:let me explain the problem by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      I sure don't think so. It would have been hard to make a post a year ago that refuted an AMD policy that is apparently new now.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    6. Re:let me explain the problem by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      You don't want to make a warranty claim and would rather resolve the problem yourself without involving the manufacturer.


      It would depend on how AMD is going to resolve the warenty on the fan. Do they require shipping it back? How long does it take to replace the defunct unit? It may very well end up being quicker and cheaper to get a superior part on one's own.

      Now - a replacement CPU. That's a far more expensive part. Price will likely outweight many people's time requirements.
    7. Re:let me explain the problem by dracocat · · Score: 1

      Your mistake was fixing the fan. Just let the CPU overheat with the broken fan and then take the CPU back and get a new fan with the new CPU.

    8. Re:let me explain the problem by Basje · · Score: 1

      AMD seems to say that taking off the stock cooler is voiding your warranty. Therefor they indicate that the cooler is an integral part of the proc. Thus if the cooler fails, your proc is defective, and eligible for replacement under the warranty.

      I doubt however, that many fans fail before the warranty expires.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    9. Re:let me explain the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      it would not be reasonable for them to expect a user to not use their computer for the time it takes to ship back a bad fan and get a replacement.

      Why would this not be reasonable? Do you think your local garage would not expect you to stop using your car if you were getting your brakes repaired?

    10. Re:let me explain the problem by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      *DING* We have a winner! Shit happens, you have to wait for it to get fixed. End of story. Now quit overclocking. ;)

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    11. Re:let me explain the problem by y4h0oo · · Score: 1
      You obviously misread his post (and got modded to +5 !?)
      The original poster said :
      it would not be reasonable for them to expect a user to not use their computer for the time it takes to ship back a bad fan and get a replacement

      but also :
      If they were supplying a fan and heatsink that would never need replacement, they might be on a more moral high ground, but having a stock fan that dies easily and then claiming you void the warranty if you correctly replace the heat sink isn't user friendly.

      --
      I'll change my sig when I have the time...
    12. Re:let me explain the problem by 0xA · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I had to deal with this yesterday. I went and bought a new system, put it all together and discovered a memory problem. Further inspection showed it to be a motherboard issue.

      In order to get my CPU out so I could exchange the board I had to remove the heatsink. In order to put the CPU / heatsink in my new board I had to use thermal grease as you are not supposed to use the pads twice.

      It looks like I know have no CPU warranty. Nice.

    13. Re:let me explain the problem by Danse · · Score: 1

      If the brakes failed while under warranty, they would most likely be obligated to provide you with a comparable rental vehicle so that you are not overly inconvenienced while the repairs are being made. You paid for a working vehicle, and they have to provide that for you.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    14. Re:let me explain the problem by chiph · · Score: 1

      I had a similar problem - the stock fan RPM sensor would fail intermittantly. It'd be running fine at 4800 rpm, and then drop to zero for a few seconds, and then indicate 4800 rpm again. Since it was so random, there's no way I would expect them to duplicate the problem (assuming they even tried), plus, I wanted lower temps anyway. So I replaced the stock unit with a Vantec, and got lower noise levels as a side benefit.

      Chip H.

    15. Re:let me explain the problem by aka1nas · · Score: 1

      AFAIK this is not new at all, Using a non-approved heatsink with a retail AMD CPU has ALWAYS voided the warranty. The OEMs don't have a real warranty to begin with, so they aren't even an issue.

  47. Reasonable? Not if you want a working system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About a month ago, I decided to build a dual processor Athlon MP system. When I got the cpu, I thought "neat! this pink goo is a big improvement over the usual messy paste"

    Except, my system wouldn't boot. It would start for about 1 sec., then shut down with an overtemperature warning. I called Gigabyte and a month or so later, I get an email "replace the pad with thermal grease". A little bit of thermal paste and some rubbing alcohol later, the system runs just fine!

    So, anyway, if AMD doesn't want people to use different heatsinks or thermal grease, they should sell something that _works_.

  48. Optimized Code by RWarrior(fobw) · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's well known in some circles that using processor-specific optimized code causes the processor to heat up.

    I have two AMD Athlon MP 2000+'s in on a Tyan Tiger MPX motherboard, and a gig of ram, in a full-tower case with four intake fans -- one on the bottom front, one on the side middle over the cards, and two in the middle back under the power supply. The exhaust fan is the PS, of course.

    When running Windows 2000 on this machine, the operating temp as reported by the BIOS runs between 50c and 60c.

    When I run Gentoo Linux, set up from a stage1 install and compiled specifically for the Athlon MP, the machine crashes as the temperature rises to 75c.

    I'm using the retail processors that came with the fan. It's plain that they're installed correctly, but the thermal pad on the bottom (even with the adhesive backing removed properly) isn't capable of dissapating the heat.

    Does this mean I'm prohibited by warranty terms from running optimized code? AMD really needs to answer this question. If they want to they could easily come up with a recommended list of approved grease, or contract with someone to sell "official grease" for situations like mine.

    --
    Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
    1. Re:Optimized Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have my permission to run Gentoo. You can not help it if your OS is so elite that it crashes your AMD system. Then again, you could just run Windows if you want the system to actually work.

    2. Re:Optimized Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's well known in some circles...

      Try to distance yourself from these circles. They are full of fucking idiots.

    3. Re:Optimized Code by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have two AMD Athlon MP 2000+'s in on a Tyan Tiger MPX motherboard, and a gig of ram, in a full-tower case with four intake fans -- one on the bottom front, one on the side middle over the cards, and two in the middle back under the power supply. The exhaust fan is the PS, of course.

      First problem! You need at least as many exhaust fans as you have intakes, maybe one more if you are counting the PS fan as an exhaust. Turn the two in the back of your case around, and I bet the CPU temperatures will drop 10 or 15 degrees.

      When running Windows 2000 on this machine, the operating temp as reported by the BIOS runs between 50c and 60c.

      When I run Gentoo Linux [gentoo.org], set up from a stage1 install and compiled specifically for the Athlon MP, the machine crashes as the temperature rises to 75c.


      Are you playing UT2k3 in Windows, or using Office? Compiling code (something gentoo does *a lot* of!) taxes the CPUs and generates quite a bit of heat, writing a letter in Word doesn't. That might explain the difference in Windows and Linux operating temps. Also, make sure you have "make CPU idle calls when idle" option set in your kernel config, and check this thread in the gentoo forums about enabling halt-cooling in the chipset. It doesn't specifically mention your board, but it has links to sites that might.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    4. Re:Optimized Code by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

      Does the distro support passive CPU cooling? Might be a problem. I use CPUIdle because windows sucks at this so much, does Linux have something similar for Athlons? I know the HLT instruction isn't enough.

      Of course, there is still the problem if youre running 100% CPU time always...

      --
      Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
    5. Re:Optimized Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computer should not overheat like that.

      The thing that is going on is in Windows 2000, the processor is halted when the computer is idle, and thus it can stay cooler under no load. It seems that Linux is not doing this for whatever reason, so the CPU heats up and crashes the computer.

      The computer should be able to take a 100% CPU load all the time and not overheat. I run Seti so my computer's CPU (Athlon-XP 2000+) is basically cranked. CPU temp is 50-60C. If I turn off Seti and let it idle it'll drop 10-15 degrees. And this is with the heatsink AMD provided.

      My only complaint is that the CPU temp rises significantly with only a bit of dust collected in the cooler, and it needs cleaning every few months or else it gets hot enough to start causing errors. And this is with an obsecene amount of case fans (2 in the front, 3 in the rear + 2 fan power supply. Yes it's damn noisy)

    6. Re:Optimized Code by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      First problem! You need at least as many exhaust fans as you have intakes, maybe one more if you are counting the PS fan as an exhaust. Turn the two in the back of your case around, and I bet the CPU temperatures will drop 10 or 15 degrees.

      In my experience, always have one more intake fan than exhaust fan. If you do that, you'll keep the inside of your case pressurized, so that it doesn't draw in dust through optical drives/any other crack in the case.

      Even better, if you put filters on your intake fans (the snap-on ones are great!) then you'll find that your machine stays relatively dust-free on the inside. Great for those windowed cases.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    7. Re:Optimized Code by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

      I agree on having at least as many fans blowing
      out as in. I have one intake on the front, the
      power supply fan blowing out and two slot fans
      also blowing out (one right next to the graphics
      card and the other, with the metal slot part
      removed, attached right above the power supply,
      thanks to the design of my case).

      Getting air into your system is important, but
      getting the warm air out is just as, if not more
      important. Good luck!

    8. Re:Optimized Code by psavo · · Score: 1

      Hey kid, try inserting amd76x_pm module. I think you need acpi too.
      Anyway that'll drop your temps majorly down.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    9. Re:Optimized Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to read the AMD Builder's Guide available at http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white _papers_and_tech_docs/25823.pdf, specifically the basic case selection guidelines on page 1.

      You're not supposed to have intake fans near the exhaust fans, and AMD doesn't seem to care for intake fans at all.

    10. Re:Optimized Code by siliconeyes · · Score: 1

      Heck, it's probably too late to point this out since the thread is almost off the main page, but nevertheless -

      Since the past many years, CPU's no longer need the HALT instruction to keep themselves cool. This is so because all new processors (since then) automatically do this bit by themselves in hardware. Hence, no software like 'Rain' is required.

      Basically, new processors keep themselves as cool as possible by default, and there is close to nothing that can be achieved by additional software.

  49. Re:I really am quite astonished by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    If you're an idiot and break your processor while overclocking on it, why should AMD pay?

    I had to underclock my 1.2 GHz Athlon to 900 MHz to keep it from overheating in the summer in my unairconditioned apartment. In the winter, I had to keep my apartment uncomfortably cold to keep the thing from overheating, because the air vents for my heater are too near the computer area.

    This was after trying a couple different heatsinks, and getting thermal grease.

    Now both my systems are 2.4 GHz P4s. They run way cooler than the AMDs, even when I let my heater make my apartment toasty warm.

  50. Re:I really am quite astonished by treat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you're an idiot and break your processor while overclocking on it, why should AMD pay?

    What if you're just trying to be responsible, and applied thermal compound to your cpu as per standard industry practice? Should you be responsible for a faulty CPU when you took every reasonable effort to protect it from overheating?

  51. Re:makes sense by kjd · · Score: 1

    Not the only reason. Some want quieter systems, and some want more efficient cooling for whatever reason, regardless of clock speed.

  52. Obvioius Intent by gnarled · · Score: 1

    The obvious intent here is to make it so they are not liable for people who overclocked their CPUs and broke them, because anybody overclocking would definately upgrade thier cooling system.

    --
    I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
  53. Nice, but clueless sentiment... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    It's adequate to cool it down- with a room at precisely 75 degrees, a fully and properly designed case, and a VERY noisy fan. If any of those criteria aren't met, you start running at temperatures, that while within AMD's specs, will definitely shorten the life of the CPU and the motherboard it's sitting on and lower it's overall stability. For some, this stuff is so that they can have the performance without the noise. For some, it's to have an extended range of temperatures that are adequate for their machine's good operation.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  54. Probably the old crap grease meant for old crap IC by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    I believe it's because of that white crap that would cause many different processors to blow, the older Cyrix and early AMD's were victims.

    I know Cyrix is old but is 24 watts dissipation not such a big deal anymore?

    Oh, via's remake of the Cyrix runs almost cold, but slow compared to shrieking new ones.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  55. Arctic Silver is an Epoxy?! by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    That's news to me and about everyone else using it.

    This is the Arctic Silver AMD's talking about.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  56. Same with my P4 by essdodson · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recently bought an Intel retail boxed P4 and they strongly urged you not to use thermal grease. They said instead to use the thermal tape that came on their heatsink, and I did. Their reasoning is that the grease dries and it makes it impossible to remove the heatsink from the chip and you'll damage the chip.

    --
    scott
    1. Re:Same with my P4 by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Intel only recommends thermal grease for Socket 423 P4 processors. Chomerics T454 phase change material is the recommended thermal interface material for Socket 478 P4 processors.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    2. Re:Same with my P4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried to remove the HSF that's been glommed onto the CPU with a phase-change TIM? That shit melts when you first start the CPU and solidifies and bonds to the CPU. Clean removal is nearly impossible.

      It might not be such a big deal on an Intel chip with a metal heat-spreader (which can be sanded down), but on an AMD (with its bare core), scraping that crap off is nerve wracking.

  57. This article shut down my CPU! by ipsuid · · Score: 1

    After running for over 3 months continuously, my Athlon PC shut down due to CPU temperature... while reading the article!!! Too weird.

    --
    It appears Ockham lost his razor and grew a beard.
  58. Re:Grease? Feh. TIM pads, baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From your link

    "It's water based, which makes it inherently useless as a real thermal transfer agent, because it'll dry out quite quickly. It may also cause corrosion."

    Yep, every bit as good.

  59. Not "No Grease" by Drathos · · Score: 1

    I read about this earlier today on hardocp.com.

    AMD isn't saying you can't use thermal grease at all. It's trying to limit what you use. They are evidentally having problems with thermal greases that contain conductive particles (like the Arctic Silver grease) shorting out the processors. Unfortunately, a lot of enthusiasts and overclockers use that type of thermal grease becuase it *does* transfer the heat to the heatsink better.

    --
    End of line..
    1. Re:Not "No Grease" by eclectro · · Score: 1

      That begs the question if the thought is (at AMD at least) artic silver user == overclocker, and burning up cpus because of it.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Not "No Grease" by Drathos · · Score: 1

      either way, i think they could've helped themselves by putting a heat spreader on the cpu like they do for the opteron and intel does for the p4. that would serve three purposes: 1) help with the cooling by providing a larger contact point for the heatsink, 2) prevent the problem of crushed cores they had with some heatsinks, and 3) prevent the shorts that the particles in artic silver can cause.

      --
      End of line..
  60. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Osty · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anyways, we decided to return the cpu, covered in grease, back to the local fry's

    If the CPU was so covered in grease, it's no wonder it ran hot. Thermal grease is meant to be used very sparingly. You want a very thin layer, just enough to fill the microscopic crevices on the CPU and heatsink mating surfaces (if the surface of the heatsink has larger-than-microscopic grooves, it's time to get out the sand paper and lap the base to a shiny finish). As good of a thermal conductor as thermal grease may be, it's terrible in comparison to a direct metal-on-metal connection. If you see a lot of grease squeeze out when you apply the heatsink, you've got too much. What you want to do is apply a thin bead of grease to one end of the CPU die, and spread it thinly across using a credit card or other device (driver's license, heavy piece of paper, etc).


    If your thermal grease is applied correctly, it will come off of the CPU with little problem. A cotton swab and a dab of rubbing alcohol should be more than enough. If you have to scrub, you had too much grease to begin with.

  61. Shin Etsu G 749 by bstadil · · Score: 1
    And you guy's complain about Mozilla's Branding Strategy.

    Hate to see what names they didn't go with, before chosing this one.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  62. AMD did *NOT* say it would void the warrantee! by jfroebe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Exactly where did AMD say it would void the warrantee? All AMD said, according to the article, is that they recommend a particular type of thermal grease. They didn't even MENTION the word "warantee"!

    The author is jumping to conclusions prematurely.

    Jason

    --
    No one has seen what you have seen, and until that happens, we're all going to think that you're nuts. - Jack O'Neil
    1. Re:AMD did *NOT* say it would void the warrantee! by Zoko+Siman · · Score: 1
      Actuly, you couldnt be more wrong, or pay less attention to details

      There has been a rumor floating around the internet that using Arctic Silver on an AMD processor voids the warranty on that chip. Well, one of our writers, DCFlux, set out to find out if that was, in fact, the truth. To do this, he went straight to the source and asked AMD.
      AMD has directly confirmed that your warranty is void if you use any type of thermal grease other than Shin Estu G 749. AMD also provides their reasoning for this rule.
      first paragraph =) You ARE right about one thing, they didnt mention warrantee, but they did mention warranty =)
  63. OEM Chips by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

    The implication that OEM AMD processors are without any warranty whatsoever is appalling to me. If they ship me a dead chip, they need to replace it. While I am aware of the problems with morons who crack/fry/kill their CPUs due to ignorance/OCing, I have been piecing x86 boxes together fo years. If they won't warranty their stuff (OEM or not), I won't buy it. I won't build machines based on them for my customers either. Either stand up and take a stand on what you have made (AMD's chips), or I cannot in good conscience base my professional reputation on those products. For the record, I don't overclock anything that is still in warranty (I have a k6-2 I just overclocked, because I could care less if it dies, and if it does I have a couple of spare CPUs).

    This news really gives me pause. I was planning on getting a water cooled case for my current OEM Athlon 2100+ so that the damned thing would be quieter, and then another for the x86-64 I was planning to build before to terribly long. However the removal of that as an option.... I would rather not go back to Intel, but they at least stand behind their stuff.

    1. Re:OEM Chips by NedTheNerd · · Score: 1

      HA HA HA whatever dude intel does the SAME godamn thing because they are OEM chips the OEM from which you originaly bought it is responsible fo the waranty so go protest something else!

  64. Heatsink? by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's the big deal? Just take the heatsink off. I did, and there haven't been any pr%L:``

    --

    Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

    1. Re:Heatsink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny yes, but with a P4 you would keep on truckin'. (Appropriate speed vehicle reference)

  65. great! by Pierre · · Score: 1

    No I just have to find a use for my old heat sink.

    hmmmmm. It's twice the size of my car's radiator maybe I can overclock my Yugo.

  66. Among other things they won't accept.. by TrAvELAr · · Score: 1

    I was at a seminar in Chicago last Friday. Among the AMD reps was Michele Lam from AMDs corporate HQ. She's some big person in the RMA area and she pointed this out to us. Among other things they don't accept are: cracked or chipped CPUs and burned CPUs. I found the burned CHPUs amusing as my CPU caught on fire on Thursday and after a long discussion with Michele, she assured me they would accept the chip. I would have to say it probably depends on who is working in receiving that day. :)

    1. Re:Among other things they won't accept.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get her number? Sounds like a girl that talks heatsinks must be right up the typical slashdotters alley...

  67. They have a picture, too by Wee · · Score: 1
    I got an SN41G2 for my birthday Saturday. The installation manual not only says to install the CPU using thermal grease, but it also has a little picture (step 2.3.4 on page 7) of a small, gloved hand squirting a healthy dollop on the top of the chip. The accessory pack comes with a small packet of Stars brand "Heatsink Compound" with which to do the job. I ordered an OEM CPU yesterday, and it's going to be installed with the thermal grease that the Shuttle came with. If AMD doesn't like that then they can take it up with Shuttle.

    I can't speak to the issue of AMD CPUs frying themselves. None of the many AMD processors I've owned since I first bought a K6/166 have ever become overly warm or lit on fire. But then again, I usually take the 30-50% I save from not buying Intel and get a good cooler (along with other accessories).

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:They have a picture, too by liposuction · · Score: 0

      Good luck with your new Shuttle. I love mine. Just remember two things that I overlooked in my excitement:

      1. Take the plastic off of the copper shim.

      2. Put the copper shim in with the correct side up. The "up" stamped into it is a little confusing, as the stamped word goes through the entire shim.

      Luckily I didn't burn out my CPU, but in my haste overlooked these things.

      --
      "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
    2. Re:They have a picture, too by Wee · · Score: 1
      Hey, thanks for the tips. I noticed that shim and thought it was nice they included it.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  68. NO grease for you; you MUST use grease!! by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Kinda interesting how these kinds of decisions are based on nothing technical. The basic reason everyone's been able to figure out for no grease on XPs is that:
    1) using grease means you are DIY with 3rd party stuff, which means it's easier for you (or the 3rd party suff you have) to screw up and
    2) using grease *improves* thermal contact, making it easier to overclock, which of course voids your warranty anyway.

    Now compare the XP's "no grease" tag like to this from the AMD Athlon(TM) 64 Processor Thermal Design Guide (from page 22, secion 2.6.6):
    The heat sink makes contact with the top surface of the processor package utilizing the thermal interface material between the processor lid and the heat sink. AMD recommends using a high-performance grease such as those listed in Table 6. AMD does not recommend using phase-change materials between the heat sink and the processor. Phase-change materials develop high adhesion forces between the heat sink and processor when the material is in the solid phase. This strong adhesive force may cause the processor to stick to the heat sink. During heat sink removal, this strong adhesive force may cause the processor to be removed from the socket while it is locked, and this action can result in damage to the socket or to the processor pins.
    For those that don't know, the gum-paste stuff that comes on all XP heatsinks is "phase-change material." Seems the 64 is the *exact* opposite of the XP.
    1. Re:NO grease for you; you MUST use grease!! by puetzk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Athlon 64 has a integral heat spreader (like the P4 and opteron) instead of an exposed die. This means the core is well shielded, and has nothing exposed to short out. Athlon has the die exposed, and bridges on the top of the chip exposed, which conductive greases sometimes short out. So, the mounting configuration is pretty different, and it doesn't surprise me in the least that the recommended way to mount the heatsink is different.

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
    2. Re:NO grease for you; you MUST use grease!! by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Yeah well Intel suggests the use of thermal paste in the thermal design docs for the Socket 423 processors for the same reason AMD gives for the Athlon 64. Then in the thermal design docs for Socket 478 processors Intel goes back to recommending phase change material, but not the same kind of phase change material that AMD recommends for Athlon XP processors. The reason that AMD recommends phase change material for the Athlon XP is that thermal paste has the tendancy to be pumped out of the contact between the processor and heatsink. This happens after the repeated heating and cooling of the processor. The Athlon XP has a much larger package size than the Opteron or the Athlon 64. However the contact area on the Athlon XP is much less than the contact area of the Opteron and the Athlon 64. My guess is that the recommendation on whether to use paste or phase change material depends on at least one of these reasons. In any case you are probably best off using phase change material for the Athlon XP and thermal grease or whatever else AMD recommends for the Opteron and the Athlon 64.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  69. Smidgeon by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1
    Yes, smidgeon is perfectly acceptable for 'a tiny bit'.
    A dictionary search turns up:
    a tiny or scarcely detectable amount
    --

    Yay me!

    1. Re:Smidgeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A smidgeon is an amount equal to the size of a small pidgeon.

  70. WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 5, Informative

    I should know I've installed several dozen and got pissed at using various custom substances so a qtip dipped in wd40 along with a soft tissue dipped in likewise and one piece of toilet paper (to wipe off that nasty ass gasoline smell it leaves behind and the greasy looking stains you'd otherwise have left on it).

    And voila, looked like new, took a new coat of thermal paste/grease and... ran like new, all my servers still running after 2.0 years :)

    That's my 2 cents.

    JOKE: And to boot I bet it will never squeak either. Plus WD40 cuts through roughly any household thermal grease, including the vaunted Arctic Silver II stuff. The silicone paste comes off with water if anyone's worried. A moist towelette type thing will work just fine including the Staples/Radioshack anti static wipes. Hope that helps.

    -Daedalus

    PS - Arctic Silver 2 is good stuff, but not really much more effective than say... radioshack 1.99 tubes of thermal goo... the only rule is that you should use SOME form of evening compound to fill in gaps and uneven surface finish between cpu and heatsink... any paste will usually do, even thermal pads are better than nothing, unless that ONE degree difference from Arctic Silver II REALLY means much to you... in general all the silver compounds do is react to temperature changes more quickly... but unless you're running a superspiking cpu, you won't have an issue, and I have never had a cpu that spiked so fast and so hard that the thermal paste made a difference. Oh and to add, I've never had a CPU fail. It is all about cooling and how often you turn them on and off. Much like diesel motors...

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Say, is that for getting the goop off the heatsink or the top surface of the CPU itself? I always assumed you couldn't use a solvent of any kind on the surface of a CPU. Don't know why, just thought it might be too delicate.

    2. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by alexburke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you think WD-40 works similarly to acetone? Because it contains varsol, a blend of three (IIRC) solvents. At the same time, WD-40 is greasy and will leave a film on whatever you use it on. And no, toilet paper won't get it all off!

    3. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Squarewav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dont see how it would hurt the cpu, but still if the cpu is dead to begin with, spraying it down with WD40 isn't going to break it more then what it already is

    4. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      I was actually talking about acetone or alcohol.

    5. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

      Soap and water works for a heatsink with the added effect that it will look like new, unless you stained it with something... even arctic silver comes off with some UltraDown, Ivory or whatever other dishwashing soap you use. Period. My heatsinks all look pearly white clean (except the annodized ones, they look pearly black but still... you get the idea).

      I have several multi ghz cpus from amd, and not ONE has fried, had issues, etc. I don't see why yours would be any different.

      -Daedalus

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    6. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Right, I know you won't harm the heatsink. But what do you use to clean the goop off the CPU itself?

    7. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 2, Informative

      WD40... it doesn't penetrate the CPU itself... but it dissolves the silver goop. For silicone based goops just use everyday rubbing alcohol, isopropyl is best but ethyl alcohol makes no difference really. I believe ethyl is potable and combustible... double check that but I'm pretty sure on it. Either way almost anything can clean the radioshack crap, but alcohol is the least likely to damage the chip itself. My recommendation is that WD40 is overkill but not as bad as acetone. Acetone is way harsh compared to an oil based lubricant. (as you may recall WD40 is not an abrasive, it is a lubricant and a mild solvent). I recommend NOT spraying it onto the chip, spray it ona piece of paper towel, fold the corner and neatly remove any of the goop from tight areas, then with a few broad sweeps remove the rest of the crap from the die itself. Bam, done.

      -Daedalus

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    8. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

      I said toilet paper with rubbing alcohol, the second sheet for rubbing off excess mess to prevent it from leaving drying stains, on the upside it (WD40 or any other degreaser) WILL completely remove anything else involved... and silicone compound leaves that same greasy mess, and silver compound literally taints your cpu by remaining in every crevice, hole and pore the surface might have. Nothing short of a solvent will remove it after that. All in all once used a CPU will never be as clean as when it was originally sealed and shipped.

      -Daedalus

      PS - Actually tho, speaking of harshness of solvents, as I recall from childhood, WD40 (and most copy cats) doesn't eat paint... acetone does. And not just clearcoat, shaving cream does that trick fine... but it actually dissolves some paints downright quick. WD40 does not. On the other hand, being a petroleum based solvent it WILL however produce nasty fumes, leave greasy residue/film and burn if exposed to heat. Thus it is recommended to clean the cpu with an alcohol swab, but the stuff WILL definitely remove silver goop without trouble. Plus, I do not have acetone in my garage anymore, not for years since I lived in europe, but I bet damn near EVERYONE has a can of WD40! Even the least tech savvy redneck has a can in their garage if not for car work then for squeaky door hinges.

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    9. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ONLY thermal grease that is worth paying more than $1.99 for a tube of is anything that is a Type44 it's a real milspec thermak compound that is designed for military applications and works quite a bit better than the other overhyped junk out there.

      and yes it put's the way overhyped arctic silver crap to shame. if it doesnt say meets milspec MIL-C-47113 on it then the stuff is crap

    10. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, fingernail polish remover is/contains acetone. Probably most of us have, or live with someone who has, some of that around. If not, it's pretty easy to come by in the drug store.

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    11. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Yep, ethyl alcohol is just another name for ethanol. Booze, that is.

    12. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      OT, but oh well...WD40 also gets crayon off walls.

    13. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I said toilet paper with rubbing alcohol

      No you didn't. You said:

      and one piece of toilet paper (to wipe off that nasty ass gasoline smell it leaves behind and the greasy looking stains you'd otherwise have left on it).

      I guess you need to read your own posts, or drop you smartass .sig:

      Thank you for actually READING thoroughly instead of latching to any one word or set thereof.

    14. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Ugot2BkidNme · · Score: 1

      Honeslty I have to say this is a bit Pointless WD-40 is a really bad idea to clean your processor with you screw up and get that on a pin good luck is all I have to say about that. When tryign to clean something off we should go to the expert. Martha Stewart yeah thats right Martha she not only knows insider trading but can tell you how to remove just about any stain or spot. So what is he words of wisdom. Lighter Fluid yes thats right Lighter Fluid. I prefer Ronsol comes of clean fast and also totaly evaporates you just need to wait a few hours to be on the safe side. Before placing it back in your motherboard.

    15. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Aguamala · · Score: 0

      yeah...that might be good...until your processor gets wicked hot and starts a fire.

    16. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks! This hands-on hardware stuff is completely new to me, so I need all the help I can get...

    17. Re:WD40 or MagicOFF at advance auto works 4 me :) by Ugot2BkidNme · · Score: 1

      Try Something for me take put lighter fluid on a non flameable surface wait two hours then attempt to light it. If it lights please video tape it and send it to me. Since I can't even get it to light after 20 minutes unless I create a pool of liquid.

  71. Really doesn't matter by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    And in case anyone is really worried, I have *never* heard of AMD refusing an RMA because of something like this. I just sent one back a month ago that died. It was almost certainly due to my mobo shorting itself out (but then comming back to life with a dead CPU), and I used both Arctic Silver III and a custom copper HSF. Just wiped off the CPU, packaged it up and sent it back, got my replacement in about 2 weeks, no problem whatsoever.

    But a warning to anyone with a retail XP: KEEP THE ORIGINAL HSF. It doesn't matter if you don't use it, keep it on a shelf as the RMA process *requires* you to send the CPU back with the HSF, and the HSF has your serial # on it, *not* the CPU itself.

  72. WTF? I posted that as a child to something else.. by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    Oh well, seems it's already been moderated down. Oh my, what will it do to my Karma?

    Only the moderators can tell...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  73. Can't say I care. by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I don't run the fastest/newest stuff, so when I bought an AMD 2200+, it costs me about $75.

    I go on Priceline and I look for the cheapest stuff I can get, ideally from a place that I can trust (have used in the past). Ideally there are warrenties and stuff - but since I'm shooting for the cheapest... I get what I pay for.

    As a result, I just sort of take it in stride - I can make my system the way I want and have to just eat it if I lose the processor.
    But since it is only $75, it isn't that big a deal to me.

    Were I making hundreds of these computers a year, or were I using the top of the line processors when they first came out - then I would likely care - but I can risk $75 on a computer that I build every year (at most).

    That said - I do tend to use Crucial's RAM since I've never had issues with them - and they tend to cost a little more - but the difference is a few dollars - slightly different than processors.

    I have been building a cluster and trying to have a fast buy cheap node and the Athlon has helped me with that. A cluster with the default heatsink would be loud as hell - so I use a quiet system instead - as a result, I use the thermal compound that comes with that. I've already had a case where the system was overheating and I wondered if it fried the chip - but the motherboard detects heat issues and shuts down if that is the case.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  74. Screw 'Em! by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    After reading a few short posts... I came to this conclusion: screw em. Keep buying the oem processors. I just bought an XP 2400+ and got the retail version only because it was about the same price. (From googlegear.com) Now that I know the only difference is a restricted warranty and a crappy hs/fan combo, I'll continue to buy oem processors in the future. I'm sure the only ones who lose out are AMD. And btw, AMD, I used a tube of old Radio Shack silicon based grease and a volcano 5 (yes, 5) ... and my system is nice and cool at about 50C under full load (folding protein.) Nya nya nya.

    --
    FLR
  75. Acetone's a bit extreme... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Informative

    It DOES work- and well. But I've found that "Goof Off" and "Goo Gone" do an equally adequate job and don't have anywhere near the flash point acetone does...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      All of the goo/goof products are just Naptha aka lighter fluid. Naptha dissolves pretty much any oily or greasy substace. I got started using it for cleaning when it was recommended in a Guitar Repair book that I bought. I've always used Ronsonol lighter fluid for cleaning any surface that gets greasy from human contact (keyboards, computer cases etc) It works wonders and is only about a $1.29 a bottle vs $5-$7 for goof off.

    2. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by alexburke · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, they're not naptha. They're d-limonene, a totally natural product derived from orange peel.

    3. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lipids disolve lips.. for the most part. Same with non-lipids. :)

      I'm not a ChemE, but a good friend is. Lighterfluid gets off various glues too.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    4. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      Lipids disolve lipids. I like my first post though :)

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    5. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      They may have changed their forumla since the last time I used a goo remover. It smelled like lighter fluid.

    6. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      limonene is a hydrocarbon and does contain a benzene but it's a member of the turpentine family.

    7. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, they're not naptha. They're d-limonene [floridachemical.com], a totally natural product derived from orange peel.

      Are the petroleum distillates mentioned on the GoofOff label totally natural, too? I don't remember my oranges tasting like that.

    8. Re:Acetone's a bit extreme... by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
      You are both right. Goo-Gone it has both orange oil and naphtha.

      Goof-off has neither.

      There's also a Goof-off-2, but it's getting pointless.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  76. jpeg topics by willr7 · · Score: 0

    I recently noticed that on the home page the articles no longer have the jpeg image for the topic they represent. I.E. if the article is about portable games, right underneath the headline there is the jpeg of a game boy. I think it is easier for a reader to do a quick scroll down the main page and just see the image related to a topic he/she wants to read about...as opposed to reading each headline and caption. What happened, and will they bring this feature back?

  77. OEM cpus, 90 day warranty by olsonjj · · Score: 1

    So what if AMD only covers it for 90 days? Damn..the cpu's are cheap anyhow... buy 2. If you are using your own fan and heatsink, odds are you are familar with application of the thermal compound and heatsink/fan combo. Yes.. you may get a DOA cpu every once in a while..but what reseller has given people problems so far? I am far more likely to toast my CPU out of my own stupidity... and guess what.. it would be my fault. Go figure. Of course, I could battle it out with the reseller, AMD, or whoever, wait forever and try to get a replacment.... or I could get online, order a new CPU and away I go...

  78. perhaps, perhaps not by Vej · · Score: 1

    As noted in another comments, there are other "recommended" heat sinks.

    However, AMD may or may not be willing to judge all heatsinks and just wants to set a "base" standard in that heatsink. Yea, it isn't great, maybe not that expensive for them to sell with it, and they'll replace it if it DOES break with it, that they don't question.

    But, do you also expect them to review every heatsink and place it on a better/worse category than the one they use, and if they do, wouldn't you just demand that they use the best one for the same cost as the middle one they use now?

  79. Heatsink Materials by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

    (from the zalman link)
    Base Material: Pure Cooper width Gold Plating

    No wonder it works so well!

  80. It's all about overclocking. by kidlinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a very inexpensive, easy to implement overclocking deterrent.

    Think about it. If it's a poor heat sink and fan that AMD requires you to use, then overclocking is out of the question because there's no way the HSF could regulate the temperature.

    See, overclocking voids the warantee, but there's no way for AMD to tell if you were overclocking. This way they do know (or it's easier for them to tell) - assuming you used a different HSF while overclocking. I wonder what they'll do when hot cpus start failing in poorly ventilated cases, or in hot climates.

    Personally I don't like it, because a crappy HSF... just sucks. I don't overclock, but I still want a half decent HSF. You could probably get away with using a different fan though. Watch, soon you'll see "heat sink extensions" that you lock on to AMD's required sink, and it extends the surface area of that heatsink.

    Though given some of the crazy cooling solutions that have been posted on /., I can understand why they'd do this. There's no way for them to tell if you weren't using a HSF on their approved list.

    --
    -kidlinux.
  81. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn straight! I wish I could mod you up ! I was working at this electronics company, and there were these linear voltage regulators running REAL hot (10W in a T0-220, no joke), and the tech smothered them in grease, I mean thick gops everywhere, PLUS those rubber spacers. So the case gets barely warm and he thinks he's the thermal champ.
    Of course, when I saw that shit I blew a fuse, (it was my design after all), but I couldn't make the guy grasp that the case has to be HOT for the heat to sink away!

  82. totally offtopic, but is thermal grease dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ask because I was swapping processors the other day and one was absolutely smeared with the stuff, and I got it all over my fingers. Anything to worry about?

  83. Depends on your grease... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative
    If your thermal grease is applied correctly, it will come off of the CPU with little problem.


    The cheap stuff (including the stuff AMD's reccomending) contains oils that tend to dry out in a year or two, leaving this gummy mess that won't come off with isopropyl. (This is the main reason for my using Arctic Silver- it doesn't dry out like Shin Etsu, etc.) For that, you've got to use something like acetone, WD-40, Goof-Off, or Goo-Gone- even if you've applied it correctly.
    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Depends on your grease... by Stonent1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      leaving this gummy mess that won't come off with isopropyl

      Isopropanol doesn't cut through grease or goo really because it is not a petroleum product. Alcohols are products of fermentation of organic material. For some reason it has become the defacto cleaner in the computer world but is really not that effective on things other than inkjet printers, and disk drives. (Sometimes keyboards). Naphtha does wonders and completely evaporates unlike WD-40 which leaves its own residue.

    2. Re:Depends on your grease... by ar32h · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've used Shin Etsu G-746 for ~3 years and have yet to have it dry out. While I have never used G-749 I do know that Hitachi used G-746 on their S/390 compatable mainframe line and I highly doubt that they would go with a low quality silicone compound considering the quality of the components in those things (no generic parts anywhere, everything of the highest quality).

    3. Re:Depends on your grease... by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

      Avon Skin-So-Soft removes grease (and also gummy
      label residue and even permanent marker off of
      certain surfaces) very well. It contains
      Eucalyptus oil. Once it "cuts" the grease, you
      can use a light soap to remove the trace of oil.
      This stuff also repels mosquitoes. Stock up, it
      is a great product, and it smells nice too! And
      no, I don't work for Avon! :^)

    4. Re:Depends on your grease... by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Isopropanol doesn't cut through grease or goo really because it is not a petroleum product. Alcohols are products of fermentation of organic material.

      Isopropanol is a petroleum product. Only ethanol is produced by fermentation. And where the stuff comes from has nothing to do with the chemical properties.

    5. Re:Depends on your grease... by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Informative my arse.

      A little basic chemistry will tell you that:
      1. The source of a chemical has nothing to do with its properties.
      2. The polarity is what you want to know.
      3. Simple alcohols are used because they're cheap and basically non-toxic.
      4. They are still rather polar, which is why they're not ideal for grease. Hexanes would work better, but are harder to get and sometimes you don't want something too nonpolar sloshing around and maybe dissolving some of your case.

    6. Re:Depends on your grease... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Isopropanol is a petroleum product. Only ethanol is produced by fermentation

      On top of that, they're all biochemicals, and can all be produced from something decaying (fermenting). Basic biochemistry will teach you that.

    7. Re:Depends on your grease... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isopropyl alcohol (or rubbing alcohol, which is 70% isopropyl alcohol) will remove Arctic Silver I/II/III completely without fail on any bare die CPU. Use a small paper towelette or Q-tip to gently scrub the surface clean.

      Similarly, you can also use a scrap of kitchen towel moistened with 409 cleaner to get rid of any remaining residue.

      Incidentally, while Arctic Silver never dries out completely, it does thicken considerably in a couple of weeks (making pumpout impossible in normal use).

    8. Re:Depends on your grease... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of that, they're all biochemicals, and can all be produced from something decaying (fermenting). Basic biochemistry will teach you that.

      Decay is not the same as fermentation. Fermentation is one of many processes that occurs during decay.
      And yes, all kinds of stuff are produced in bioprocesses.

      However, what I was referring to was the industrial production of these substances, and isopropanol is produced industrially from oil.

      And yes, I am a chemical engineer.

    9. Re:Depends on your grease... by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Olbas Oil - the blow-your-head-off decongestant will probably work too, it's a blend of various aromatic oils, and is the only thing I've found that removes dried Tippex if accidentally spilled on it....

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  84. My story with AMD heatsinks by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So i got my brand new athlon XP 2200. I plug it in, put the fan thingie on, and it runs perfectly. Then I noticed the CPU was running at about 70 degrees. A week later, I heard a loud clunk and my computer went dead. It seems that the fans they make are so craptastically made that one of the blades bent enough to get itself jammed.

    Why exactly would I be voiding my warrenty by switching to something better?

  85. probably redundant... by caino59 · · Score: 1

    but I got tired of reading through the posts...

    i saw this yesterday...and basically, what it comes down to is this:

    Artic Silver is conductive. People that do not know how to use the stuff properly have fried their processors.

    'nuff said.

    any other thermal paste is fine, providing it doesn't have tiny metal shavings in it.

    so your cheapo go from radio shack will be fine, and no, they won't burn your warranty if you take off the crappy TIM.

    You can still use AS(2, duh - you want to be able to upgrade, right?) just make sure it's off when you send it in ;o)

    kinda like getting an auto manufacturer to cover that transmission that you blew up doing burnouts - if you don't clean all the rubber from the wheel wells, and the tires are noticeably more worn than the non-drive wheels, they probably will tell you where to go.

    Just use the stuff with some knowledge, and you'll be ok.

  86. Wouldn't worry... by ottffssent · · Score: 1

    You can always buy a comparable Intel part with integrated heatspreader / core protector for twice the price. Or you could buy an extra AMD chip to practice on. Or, my personal favorite: be careful putting the HSF on.

    You have to be really careless to kill an Athlon. I've installed heatsinks dozens of times on Durons or Athlons, and haven't cracked a core yet. I've been progressively less careful as I've gotten more confident they're indestructable, but really this isn't a problem.

    Test your CPU out with stock components. If it works, get a nicer HSF. If your chip dies a year after you bought it and AMD refuses to replace it because you used a nice Zalman heatsink, buy a new chip. Really. $50 will buy you what a year ago was a cutting-edge part. Take it as a blessing and move on.

  87. More information from AMD insider by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is someone who apparently works at AMD over at the Bit-Tech forums who has been giving out unofficial information that seems to have quite a bit of merit to it. So make sure to check out what he is saying as he knows quite a bit about what he is talking about: Bit-Tech Forums (Remember, what he says isn't official, though)

  88. PowerPC by mekkab · · Score: 1

    screw CISC, give RISC the respect its due!

    And with the new PowerPC 970 (Symmetric Multi Processing and NUMA) you'll smoke! ( and I don't mean catch fire...)

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  89. Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am suprised that no one has mentioned "The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act" which could be taken to forbid this kind of warrenty restriction.

    It is the same law which forbids printer manufacturers from voiding a warrenty when you use a third party printer cartridge.

    I suspect that AMD could forbid all thermal greases but limiting it to a specific brand probably would be illegal.

    1. Re:Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act by Unbeliever · · Score: 1
      I am suprised that no one has mentioned "The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act" which could be taken to forbid this kind of warrenty restriction.

      True, Magnusson-Moss does prevent product tying as a condition of warranty. I can use aftermarket parts on a product had have the manufacturer honor the warranty if the aftermarket part didn't cause the failure.

      HOWEVER, Magnussen-Moss does allow restrictions if such restrictions are provided to the consumer AT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE. An example is if I buy a car, and the warranty requires scheduled labor at a specified garage, the scheduled labor has to be FREE OF CHARGE for the restrictions to be effective.

      In AMD's case, their AMD, processor in a box package provides the heatsink and fan. They can indeed say: "You can only use this heatsink." in the warranty terms.

      --
      --Carlos V.
    2. Re:Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act by KiahZero · · Score: 1

      What if the required restrictions were clearly inferior and worse for the product?

      The best analogy I can think of is changing the oil on the car. It has to be done, right? What if the warranty mandated that you had to have it done with craptacular oil that was known to shorten the life of your car.

      Would it be legal / ethical for the car company to have such a warranty? I would say certainly not to the second part, and possibly to the first.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
  90. The new Paradox by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    Well, I prefer a cpu that works and one where the company that makes it stands by it.

    Of course, I use to be an avid AMD fan/supporter until I had just one too many dead cpus; I switched to Intel's P4. And I'm loving it. Every overclockable, and with the thermal management (throttling) that really works and higher clocks (if the clock is high enough, it can kick athlonXP's arse).

    And another thing, I don't buy OEM and I choose items that come with a good warranty (no more "Death"-stars for me)

    1. Re:The new Paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got balls posting that here in the land of the mindless AMD zombies, dude.
      My hat's off to ya.

      They cling to the myth that Intel's chips cost a lot more than an AMD of similar performance.
      P4s may cost a little more, but you get what you pay for.

    2. Re:The new Paradox by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

      like I said....I was and still am a fan of AMD, if they can get their act together and get thermal protections working like it should.

      So in essence, I'm a fan of what works.

      Of course, in terms of price, the newer stuff is usually expensive so give it time and the prices will come down to close to that of AMD's. And yea...if you add reliability to the bang/buck formula, sadly, P4's kick ass.

  91. It's your own fault if you blow it up. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Any company would have to be STUPID to release a product WITHOUT making up restrictions like this.

    Hey... imagine that you're the dude at AMD who has to write the checks to pay back consumers who blew up their stupid chip and claimed it was defective. How would YOU feel about that? It makes your company look stupid. It makes your product look defective. It costs you money. It damages your business in every way.

    So what do they do? They get some smart engineers to figure out something that works and that's what everybody is gonna do with their chips--if they want to retain their warranty, that is. You're still FREE (as in libre, as opposed to gratis) to mess around with the thing and put whatever you want on it, be it thermal grease, a different heatsink, or, hell, the radiator off your hermano's 35-year-old Chevy II that's sitting on blocks behind the house, if that's what you're so inclined to do. Just don't come crying to AMD that you blew up your chip, cuz IT'S YOUR OWN DAMN FAULT!!!

  92. Cleaning your credit card by meowsqueak · · Score: 4, Informative

    btw, do NOT use acetone to clean your credit card after using it to spread the thermal paste... as I said before, acetone cuts through almost anything, including the surface of credit cards. At least mine still has a magnetic stripe.

  93. better than an Intel chip by shaze · · Score: 1

    Business as usual, I would rather own an AMD than a cheap flimsey Intel (POS) processor. If they supported the millions of heatsinks/fan's out there with their chips, they'd be broke quick. Financially speaking they made the right choice. But I'm posisitive you can clean up your crispy chip from the overclock-killin' you did to it the last year and AMD will never know.

    1. Re:better than an Intel chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is an intel processor cheap and flimsey? I didn't know they made processor zealots... Guess you learn something new every day.

  94. Another paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use toothpaste. Works like a charm. Colgate BiCarb stuff works the best

  95. Re:I really am quite astonished by error0x100 · · Score: 1

    Should you be responsible for a faulty CPU when you took every reasonable effort to protect it from overheating?

    If you're overclocking, yes. Otherwise, no.

  96. Re:I really am quite astonished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the cores aren't rated to go to 105C. There's a letter code in the part number that indicates the maximum rated temperature for that revision which can be as low as 70C. Although I think the original Athlons like you've got are rated at either 90C or 95C.

  97. Shin Estu G 749, yea right, want fries with that? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    AMD, the article says, doesn't want you to use anything "other than Shin Estu G 749.

    And what kind of stupid look do you think I would get if I went into my local computer retailer, ever the one with the AMD logo pasted on their wall, and siad I wanted to buy Shin Estu G 749.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  98. Oh, the inhumanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When I received my AthlonXP 2400+ retail box, the heatsink was missing the covering for the adhesive pad...I think I'll go back to Intel when I have to upgrade again.

    What a sad, sad story. I can't blame you for never getting over it. I'll bet you run Windows and think blues screens, system freezes and re-booting several times a day is acceptable. Pssst, wanna buy a Pentium with a minor floating point bug?

  99. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I have one of the Zalman deals on mine - copper and many blades that fan out. They all meet together at the bottom and at first glance it looks like a solid block there.
    I put a little bit of thermal grease on my CPU, spread it around, and then put that heatsink down on it all and fired it up.
    I smelled a burning smell, but it all worked for about a week.
    Then it started overheating and shutting down all of the time.

    I took off the heatsink and all of the thermal paste was gone.
    The heatsink is made up of many thin fins and they are all pressed together at the bottom - the heat drove the grease up into the spaces between all of the fins and that was what I was smelling.

    I put on a thicker layer and tried it again and the system runs without a hitch (or a smell) now.

    So I guess there are sometimes needs for a bit more paste/grease.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  100. STAY AWAY FROM SHUTTLE by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Shuttle makes garbage. I bought a Shuttle barebones system (an SS40G) back in September, with an AMD Athlon XP chip. One day after 3 months of use the system just crapped out and died for no apparent reason. No video signal, nothing. Fans and lights are on, but nobody is home. Thinking it might be the CPU, I got a replacement. Nope, that wasn't it.

    So I got an RMA number from Shuttle and sent it to their RMA center. It came back with paperwork indicating they replaced the power supply (which didn't seem to be broken). I put the chip back in, and the system still didn't work. The guy on the phone blamed my CPU. "Your bad power supply must have blown out that CPU sir... and we always test them before we send them back. So if you send it in to us again we'll just send it right back to you."

    To complete the required mental masturbation, I tried a new (third) AMD CPU today. Of course it didn't work. This thing is going back with a nasty note. I wouldn't recommend Shuttle at all.

    1. Re:STAY AWAY FROM SHUTTLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my new shuttle sn41g2, while I haven't had it that long, its been nothign but a pleasure so far, maybe you just had a bad experience with one of their original small form factor products. Considering they are one of the first companies (if not the first) to begin making these style computers I have to applaud them, I do hope your computer gets fixed for free however.

    2. Re:STAY AWAY FROM SHUTTLE by cowmix · · Score: 1

      I have bought four of the various cubes from Shuttle (both P4 and Athlon based) and I love them. No problems, really fast, really quiet.

  101. what about improper installation? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I think with the car example, if you install an important part yourself and are not a qualified professional, the company may be able to argue you did an improper installation job. Similarly, if you install your own heatsink, AMD could argue that you installed it improperly (not a farfetched notion, as a lot of heatsinks are improperly installed).

    1. Re:what about improper installation? by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Just a side note, Intel has the same clause in their warrantees that "improper installation" can void the warantee, so I guess it isn't just bad AMD, possibly depending on how they interpret "improper installation".

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:what about improper installation? by shdragon · · Score: 1

      I have a big problem with any company defaulting to "we noticed you didn't use the approved XXX Brand, but Brand YYY, (a company that didn't pay to have exclusive rights). Therefore, it's your problem".

      Like in the car example, warranty/insurance companies/mfg. cannot invalidate your warranty just because you have modifications. Now, if the modifications are shown to have been the cause of the failure, then you're on your own. I think that's a pretty fair standard.

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
  102. Well.. how about this. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Greasing incorrectly makes things worse.

    Furthermore, this is for AMD RETAIL cpus only, not OEM. So.. if you buy a retail cpu, they expect you to use the equipment they want you to use to cool it, or they won't honor the warrantee.
    Fair enough.

    If you want to use other stuff, don't buy retail, buy OEM.

  103. Thank God I live in New Zealand by nzyank · · Score: 1

    So if I put water in the gas tank of my new car and the engine is defective I have legal recourse against the car manufacturer? Just one more reason I moved out of that idiotic country. Too many laws protecting the stupid person who can't read the fucking manual and gets burnt. Take personal responsibility.

    1. Re:Thank God I live in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I put water in the gas tank of my new car and the engine is defective I have legal recourse against the car manufacturer?

      no.

      Just one more reason I moved out of that idiotic country.

      glad to see you go.

  104. Re:totally offtopic, but is thermal grease dangero by eclectro · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a pretty low risk material. Alot less toxic than motor oils, paint or glue. Don't rub yours eyes, lick your fingers, or eat the stuff and wash your hands promptly and you'll be fine.

    Here is a hazardous material datasheet for a typical thermal compound.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  105. Re:Umm What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "You do something that could _potentially_ damage the processor"

    Due to consumer protection laws, they may not void a warranty if the potential problem did not actually contribute to the actual failure.

    And a heatsink of better thermal capacity using an equivalent spec non-conductive thermal compound could in no way "potentially damage" the CPU. Seems to me they are trying to weasle out of returned CPUs that have been over-clocked and died early. And why I agree that the CPU should never have been returned (and the warranty voided) if it was run out of spec, this is the wrong way to go about it.

    I think they should just focus on whether the CPU has been run outside of spec. There are technical ways to one time record (true or false) over-voltage/clock/heat conditions.

    They are locking the barn after the horse has bolted. I can only hope that they have learned a lesson here.

  106. Oil and water just don't mix... by smartfart · · Score: 1
    Alcohol is in solution with water, and as such won't do much good against a good glob of lipid (oil/grease). Yeah, sure, it'll cut some stuff, like greasy fingerprints, etc., but some oil-based materials need oil-based solvents. Non-lipid-based solvents are repelled by these substances... like water off a duck's back, as the saying goes.

    Also there are ionic charges to consider, covalent bonding, and other factors. It's been 20+ years since I took chemistry, so most of this is a vague memory.

    Plastic is of course made from crude oil (not all plastics come from crude, but you get the idea) and therefore readily dissolves in strong lipid solvents.

    Hey, I didn't flunk out of college for nothing, man...

  107. Shhhhhh... by arhines · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...AMD planted this story to use /. brainpower to think of ways to prevent violations :) Next Intel will be posting about clock locking.

    1. Re:Shhhhhh... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      Next Intel will be posting about clock locking.
      You mean 'plier hating?
      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    2. Re:Shhhhhh... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      ...AMD planted this story to use /. brainpower to think of ways to prevent violations :) Next Intel will be posting about clock locking.

      Personally, I much prefer this method of preventing overclocking than Intel's clock locking. My humble opinion is that if you run your processor beyond published specs and it dies, your warranty should be void. However, at least this still leaves the door open for those who really do want to overclock. They do so at their own risk. I have one system that is overclocked. When I made the decision to do so, I was willing to accept responsibility if I ended up melting down the processor.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:Shhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Brainpower from slashdot? The only reason I come here is because 98% of the comments are comedy gold due to their stupidity!

    4. Re:Shhhhhh... by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      " Brainpower from slashdot? The only reason I come here is because 98% of the comments are comedy gold due to their stupidity!"

      If I still had mod priviledges I'd give you a +1 insightful.

  108. Re: 50c and 60c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a bit too hot... try to keep it under 40C.

    Oh yeah, and do like the other guy said: turn two of those fans around!

  109. Don't make a fuss by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    Buy a BOX CPU (Comes with integrated cooler). If CPU is defective, return it with the original fan and voila, no questions asked. Don't forget to remove all materials from the CPU, the perfect crime.

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  110. This is not such an 'evil' thing by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 1

    I can see where AMD is coming from. They are a business, and they are doing their best to remain profitable. It wouldn't be fair to AMD if it's customers used non standard 'grease' (damaging the processor) and needed to replace them under warranty. This has the potential to cost AMD a lot of $$$.

    If AMD goes out of business due to replacing thousands of processors, they will stop producing affordable processors and stop working on speed increases. Then most of the world will need to purchase PowerPC or Intel machines at a higher cost.

    What is so bad about "Shin Estu" grease? Is it expensive, or hard to get? If this is the case, AMD should consider testing similar products that are cheaper and easier to find. It would not cost much. After all, car manufacturers do not dictate the brand of engine oil that must be used, only the type.

  111. What's the problem? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

    Okay, so you have to use the stock heatsink. What's the problem? As long as you're not overclocking, it should be fine. If it blows up, it's covered under warranty. If you're overclocking it, thermal compound or not, YOU HAVE VOIDED YOUR WARRANTY ALREADY. The analogy at the end of that article is fucking stupid.

    Look at it this way, if you applied the same criteria to selecting a car, everyone would be driving a low power, fuel efficient station wagon with rain tires and foot-thick rubber bumpers all the way around.

    No, you would simply void your warranty by adding non-stock items on the car. Oh, wait, that's right, YOU DO. ANY TIME you heavily modify something, YOU VOID THE FUCKING WARRANTY. When you decide to overclock your chip, YOU DECIDE TO VOID TEH WARRANTY. When you put a V8 in your Hyundai, YOU ARE VOIDING THE WARRANTY. It's not that difficult to understand, people.

    --
    'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    1. Re:What's the problem? by black+mariah · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh hell, I need to triple check my spelling from now on. Teh? I sound like a fucking Counterstrike player. *SHUDDER*

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  112. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why oh why do companies have to pull this kind of shit? AMD, don't you know who your target market is?! Do you really want to alienate your bread and butter by pulling stunts like this?

  113. Re:I really am quite astonished by stj · · Score: 1

    The warranty comes from the fact that VLSI chips have a tendency to have natural faults that come from overheating singular transistors. While they are extensively tested, those faults can naturally happen during normal operation with very low probability. Of course, overclocking greatly increases that probability, because with every clock tick the same current flows through the chip, but since the ticks are more frequent, the total energy dissipated within a unit of time is greater, increasing chance that certain points can be overheated and polysilicon at transistor gates will melt and short-circuit to source and/or drain of a transistor.

    In any case, those things happen normally, too. It's a probabilistic problem and depends on temporary conditions and variation in chip manufacturing process.

    --
    iThink iHate iMod
  114. Well they better be putting hell of a cooler on it by Cyberglich · · Score: 1

    My 1.33 had major heat issues it took 4 diffent coolers end up using a orb rated for 2200+ just to keep her stable. coolers i had were rated for 1800 and 1900 wert cutting it. and that with a very very thin layer of aritic silver.

  115. State law and product warranties by Phronesis · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why the hell do they think that they have any business messing with product warranties?

    What you want to do is go to a law library and look up Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. 61 Cal.2d 256 (1963).

    Vandermark bought a new Ford in Los Angeles. Six weeks later, with 1500 miles on the odometer, the brakes failed, causing the car to wreck, seriously injuring the driver and passenger.

    The Ford Dealership acknowledged that the crash was caused by defective brakes, but pointed to the warranty that read, "Dealer's obligation under this warranty is limited to replacement ... of such parts ... acknowledged by Dealer to be defective." In other words, neither the dealer nor Ford would assume responsibility for the damage to the car or the injuries to its occupants caused by the defective brakes.

    One could argue that if Vandermark wanted a car with a warranty that would cover defective manufacture more comprehensibvely, he should have bought a car from a dealer that offered a better warranty, but no dealers offered warranties with significantly greater coverage. In 1964, the court ruled that the Ford dealership was strictly liable for product defects irrespective of what the warranty might say because

    Retailers like manufacturers are engaged in the business of distributing goods to the public. They are an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise that should bear the cost of injuries resulting from defective products.
    . This followed the train of thought set in motion by Benjamin Cardozo, who wrote in 1916 in MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. 138 NYS 224 (1912):
    If the nature of a thing is such that it is reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made, it is a thing of danger. . . . If to the element of danger, there is added knowledge that the thing will be used by persons other than the purchaser, and used without new tests, then irrespective of contract, the manufacturer of this thing of danger is under a duty to make it carefully.

    You may argue that it is a long way from automobiles whose manufacturing defects put consumers and bystanders in danger of life and limb to a defective cooling fan on a CPU, and you would be right. But if you complain in general that the state has no business interfering with product warranties, a century of case law disagrees with you.

    In closing, I will point to one of the most egregious cases in this regard. In 1937, the Massengill Company put on the market an antibiotic elixer for children composed of the drug sulfanilamide dissolved in diethylene glycol and flavoured with raspberry extract. Massengill never tested the product for safety. Diethylene glycol being a very nasty poison, 107, mostly children, died shortly thereafter from liver failure caused by this medicine. Massengill could not be sued under the laws at the time because, as the President of the company said,

    My chemists and I deeply regret the fatal results, but there was no error in manufacture of the product. We have been supplying legitimate professional demand, and not once could have forseen the unlooked for results. I do not feel that there was any responsibility on our part.
    The nation's response to this was to pass the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which established the FDA and granted it sweeping powers to regulate the market to ensure that all food, drugs, and cosmetics were safe. Many conservative jurists, such as Richard Posner (one of Ronald Reagan's first appointments to the federal bench) promoted this expansion of tort law, noting that there is an imperfect market for information and that when information asymmetries are present, a free market does not optimally allocate resources (this observation won a Nobel prize in economics for Ackerlof, Stiglitz, and Spence). The thinking of the economics-and-law crowd was that expansion of strict liability would produce a corrective force for disclosure of information that would enhance the efficiency of markets.
    1. Re:State law and product warranties by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      This could all be correct, i don't know any of these cases myself, but what has this to do with what AMD wants? If the Vandermark car was fitted with third party brakes which were not placed in it by the manufacturer and for which the manufacturer does not know if it will function correctly with the car would the outcome have been the same?

      All AMD says here is that they cannot guarantee that their product will work with thirdparty cooling solutions and when applied they will not replace any defective unit because they cannot be sure it wasn't due to the third parties product.

      Sounds very reasonable to me. I wouldn't like being held responsible for what someone else does to my products. If i created something and someone else extends it or replaces a part of it with something else i cannot be held responsible for any outcome of it's use.

    2. Re:State law and product warranties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very interesting...How do you see this applying to software product liabilities? Do you see a time when the advantageous protections afforded software developers from product liability claims (due to end user licence agreements disclaimers) erode?

      I've been speculating that the software industry, now almost 50 years old, may be approaching middle age, and should no longer be afforded "infant industry" protections.

    3. Re:State law and product warranties by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that was a whole lotta stuff I never heard before. I just gotta say that you got da funk goin' on!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    4. Re:State law and product warranties by alienmole · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've been speculating that the software industry, now almost 50 years old, may be approaching middle age, and should no longer be afforded "infant industry" protections.

      I hardly think you can say that the software industry is 50 years old. That covers a period where software was typically included along with hardware, as well as a long period where consumers couldn't buy anything remotely resembling software, mainly because they had no access to machines which could run it. The law described by Phronesis arose from concerns about interaction with "the public". The first time "the public", beyond programmers and hobbyists, was able to buy software as an independent product would have been in the early '80s, making the consumer software industry a mere 20 years old.

      One way to date the beginning of the consumer software market would be Bill Gates' famous whine of 1976, in which he anticipated the RIAA and MPAA by a couple of decades and complained about potential customers making digital copies of his intellectual property. However, at that time, Bill's product was BASIC, hardly a product sold to "the public".

    5. Re:State law and product warranties by Phronesis · · Score: 3, Insightful
      All AMD says here is that they cannot guarantee that their product will work with thirdparty cooling solutions.

      No. This thread is about warranties on unmodified chips. According to the Extreme Tek article, "In fact, according to AMD there is no warranty at all on OEM chips," whether or not you mess with the original fan. The post I replied to did not address the third-party heat-sink question, but the OEM question. It objected to the statement that in California, "State Law mandates a 1 year parts and manufacturing warranty irregardless of OEM status or not."

      So this thread has nothing to do with putting on third-party heat sinks and is about whether AMD has to provide warranties on unmodified OEM chips.

    6. Re:State law and product warranties by foooo · · Score: 1

      "But if you complain in general that the state has no business interfering with product warranties, a century of case law disagrees with you."

      Ah but you're forgetting, I also dissagree with a century of case law!

      I'm not particularly fond of the fact that case law has become such a strong argument. Surely there is room in our legal system for precedent but to tie the hands of judges with rulings made a century ago, I'd like to see our system give individual judges (especially the local ones) more discretion.

      ~foooo

    7. Re:State law and product warranties by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      It's a delicate balance between the inflexibility of precedent and the caprice of the individual judge. Many, perhaps most, businesses would prefer to work in an unfair but predictable legal arena than an unpredictable one, even if the latter were somewhat fairer on average. Even when you disagree with the prevailing standards, you can at least make coherent plans for risk management. When individual judges have too much discretion, liability suits become too unpredictable to plan for. Managing an uncertain risk can easily cost more than managing a greater but more consistent risk because what kills you in financial risks are the tails of the distribution (That's why Long Term Capital Management averaged a positive return on investment in 1998-1999, but went bankrupt in 1998 because of very improbable fluctuations.)

      Conservative thinkers tend to prefer slow change and predictability, which is why they push for mandatory sentencing laws, caps on civil awards, and other measures to limit judicial discretion. Since this nation is strongly conservative at the moment, you may have to wait some time before liberals return to power and push for greater judicial independence.

    8. Re:State law and product warranties by foooo · · Score: 1

      Well, given that I'm quite a conservative thinker, I would say that your charactarization is suspect.

      I would say that *centrists* are the ones that would prefer slow change and predictability, which is why they push for mandatory sentencing laws, caps on civil awards, and other measures to limit judicial discretion.

      Most of the conservatives I know would rather give the *local* *elected* judges more control over their lives. Just the same way they would prefer *local* *elected* authority in most cases.

      Case law better serves situations in Federal and State Court where there is a much greater interest in consitancy. Of course there are a *huge* number of cases in federal court that deal with neither state vs state, cross state or issues regarding the federal government. For example murder within 300 yards of a school building can be a federal crime... murder related to drug trafficking can be a federal crime. All of these cases belong in a local court with a local judge put in place by local citizens with local concerns in play. Today if John Ashcroft firmly believes that he needs to get the death penalty in as many murder cases as he can... crimes which the federal government as no business with. Crimes that he pursues in states like Massachusets (where there is no death penalty) just so the criminal will have a chance to die. Now I'm not against the death penalty, but the Federal Government is clearly over stepping it's constitutional bounds in many cases.

      At any rate, local judges should need to fear of being overturned by a judge that is further away from the citizens his choices will affect. Unfortunately this is how our current system is working. More precedent should be given to local choices and local politics.

      As far as liability suits, a great deal of them are ending in bizzare awards. There should be no punative damages, corporations should not shield individual wrong doing, damages should only be awarded to those who actually experienced *real damage* If someone has really done something so wrong that they deserve to pay out 30 billion dollars in punative damages then they should go to jail instead.

      And that is my conservative view.

      foooo~

    9. Re:State law and product warranties by Woodie · · Score: 1

      Of course there is also the case of several products being labeled with the following:

      "It is a violation of federal law to use this product in a manner other than intended by the manufacturer..."

      Usually this is applied to various chemical solvents and cleaning agents which people for some unfathomable reason are inclined to "huff". However, it does bring up an interesting issue.

      Most of these state laws hinge typically on what constitutes reasonable usage. Driving your car on roads and down highways, following traffic laws typically constitutes _reasonable_ usage. However, intentionally deciding to drive your car off a cliff, probably isn't _reasonable_ usage. This in turn typically obviates the responsibility of the manufacturer to your safety, because you exceeded all reasonable limits.

      What does this have to do with AMD? Well, they are trying to establish a reasonable guideline for usage. Sort of like a car manufacturer saying their seat-belts are rated for collisions of 150 MPH or less. If you then modify your car to exceed that limit, they aren't liable if the seat-belt fails. AMD is saying, we checked this heatsink out - it works; if you want to use another one, you're welcome to it - just don't blame us if your CPU fries.

    10. Re:State law and product warranties by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the clarification of your political leanings. I am confused about your comments on precedent, though. You write, "Case law better serves situations in Federal and State Court where there is a much greater interest in consitancy." There are only two kinds of courts: state and federal. There is no separate "local" court. Perhaps you're thinking of county or district divisions of state court.

      As to the benefit of local judges, you may want to think again. A local judge in the Bronx recently presided over a lawsuit in which a local jury awarded $51 million to Darryl Barnes, who was paralyzed when he drew a TEC-9 on a police officer who fired first. Bronx voters favor judges who dispense Robin Hood justice.

      Similarly, local courts have made Mississippi and many other southern states "judicial hellholes" for product liability litigation according to the American Tort Reform Association. The problem here is that the voters in the court's jurisdiction tend to identify with the plaintiff. The corporations sued generally have their factories elsewhere, so it doesn't affect the local voters if jobs dry up. On the other hand, a large award can bring a lot of money to a small county. It is this abuse of discretion by local judges and juries that makes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce call for moving litigation out of local courts and into federal courts while consumer rights groups want to keep litigation in local courts.

      As to your comment, "If someone has really done something so wrong that they deserve to pay out 30 billion dollars in punative damages then they should go to jail instead," I would only direct your attention to O.J. Simpson. O.J. did not go to jail (again, your beloved local justice did a fine job with him, as it did with the murderers of Emmett Till) and punitive damages were the most justice he received.

      At the same time, the number of liability suits ending in bizarre awards is much smaller than most people think. Just as the press tend to exaggerate spectacular events, such as civilian casualties in Iraq, and make them seem more common than they are, they also exaggerate the frequency of liability blunders (absurd verdicts, excessive awards, etc.) and do not follow up six months later when absurd awards are thrown out on appeal.

      Here are some facts, courtesy of the Center for Justice and Democracy and Public Citizen:

      • 0.02% of all civil cases handled by the state courts concern product liability.
      • The defendants win more than half of these cases.
      • When plaintiffs do win product liability cases, more than half the awards are less than $27,000.
      • Awards over $1 million are most common when the plaintiff has suffered grievous injury (paralysis, brain damage, amputation) and over half of these large awards are either reversed or reduced substantially by the trial judge or on appeal.
      • Only a small fraction of a percent of all findings for the plaintiff award punitive damages. Between 1965 and 1994, there were 379 punitive damage awards in the U.S. in product liability lawsuits. Half of these awards were less than $50,000.
      • According to the Consumer Federation of America, liability suits add about 0.26% to the cost of consumer goods. This number is similar to what the National Association of Insurance Commissioners found.
    11. Re:State law and product warranties by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      Well, given that I'm quite a conservative thinker, I would say that your charactarization is suspect. I would say that *centrists* are the ones that would prefer slow change and predictability.

      According to The American Heritage Dictionary,

      conservative ADJECTIVE: 1. Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change. 2. Traditional or restrained in style: a conservative dark suit. 3. Moderate; cautious: a conservative estimate. 4a. Of or relating to the political philosophy of conservatism. b. Belonging to a conservative party, group, or movement. 5. Conservative Of or belonging to the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom or the Progressive Conservative Party in Canada. 6. Conservative Of or adhering to Conservative Judaism. 7. Tending to conserve; preservative: the conservative use of natural resources.
      conservatism NOUN: 1. The inclination, especially in politics, to maintain the existing or traditional order. 2. A political philosophy or attitude emphasizing respect for traditional institutions, distrust of government activism, and opposition to sudden change in the established order. 3. Conservatism The principles and policies of the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom or of the Progressive Conservative Party in Canada. 4. Caution or moderation, as in behavior or outlook.
      You may want to use the word in different ways than the dictionary (hell, nobody in the press uses either liberal or conservative correctly, so why should you?), but I stand by my characterization.
    12. Re:State law and product warranties by foooo · · Score: 1

      Ok, two quick points.

      1) It's incredibly common to describe people who are republicans or libertarians (or somewhere inbetween as I am) as conservatives. Fiscal conservatives generally approve of smaller government and more local control. Distrust of government and local government being better than federal government because it's harder to watch.

      On the other hand most republicans are social conservatives, where as I am a social liberal. Which makes more sense really, less government (fiscal conservatism) generally leads to more personal freedom (social liberalism).

      www.lp.org has a link to "the worlds shortest political quiz." I think that it's pretty well in line with the common definitions for political stances and that's what I generally use to categorize people based on their political beliefs.

      2) My primary concern with putting local judges back in the drivers seat is not civil litigation. If a company operates on a national level it should be sued in a national forum. However criminal litigation should take place on the local level. While we a good general framework for what is right and wrong on a national level... I specifically choose the communities I live in based on who I want to be "a jury of my peers." This makes sense. There is enough general protection of rights to ensure (in criminal cases) that a majority is not suppressing the rights of a minority.

      So do my arguments make more sense now?

      ~fooo

    13. Re:State law and product warranties by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      OK. I think of libertarians as liberals and people like George W. Bush, Rick Santorum, and Trent Lott as conservatives. Now you've cleared up my misunderstanding. Historically, liberals were those, such as John Locke and Adam Smith, who embraced enlightenment thinking and wanted to base government and laws on liberty and rationality, where conservatives (Tories) wanted to retain God-given natural law, monarchy, hereditary station in life, etc. This translates today into liberals who want to get the government and laws out of our bedrooms and away from our liberties, and conservatives who want government and laws to enforce "traditional Judeo-Christian values."

      As Jonathan Miller once said,

      in the U.S. they have two parties, just as we [in England] have two parties. They have the Republican party, which is like our Conservative party. And they have the Democratic party, which is like our Conservative party.
      But now that I understand where you're coming from, we don't need to split hairs over political labels.

      I'm not sure what to make of your statement that you're concerned more with criminal than civil litigation. This whole thread was a about civil matters (California's laws on implied warranties). As to criminal matters, local judges and juries in the South in the 1960s accurately reflected racist community values and exonerated some awful murderers and terrorists, some of whom took advantage of the Constitutional protection against double jeopardy and sold the stories of their brutal acts to the press.

      If you think this is all ancient history, look at what local judge Edward Self did in Tulia Texas. When rogue cop Tom Coleman framed about 15% of the black population of Tulia Texas for selling cocaine in 1999 (one 57 year old hog farmer was sentenced to 99 years), Judge Self refused to admit evidence introduced by defense lawyers that demonstrated a pattern of deceit and shoddy police work by Detective Coleman. Later Judge Self lied about his refusal to admit this evidence and despite being caught lying and forced to recuse himself from appeals of the Tulia cases, Judge Self was re-elected. This spring, the cases were re-opened by higher authorities who don't have to stand for election in Tulia. Detective Coleman has been charged with three counts of aggravated perjury and all the convictions are being vacated. The State of Texas is preparing to pay the victims up to $3000 for each year they wrongfully spent in prison.

      Before you get too enamored of direct local democracy, I would recommend re-reading Federalist X on the danger of faction and the tyranny of the majority. This spring, people farther removed from the local level got involved and

  116. Cooling suggestions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Athlon's fan is starting to annoy me, what are all the other AMD users here using to keep their CPUs cool and quiet? Besides the power switch.

  117. Why? by Penguin2212 · · Score: 1

    Why the hell are they doing this when the heatsinks they ship with Athlons are pieces of crap. I bought an Athlon and used the stock heatsink for about a month. Mind you, I didn't even overclock it and, according to the internal temperature sensors, it was running it at about 65-70 degrees (celsius)! The heat alarm would start to go off every time I'd play Warcraft III. I went to the computer store, and bought the cheapest heatsink/fan there, slapped it on there and it runs at least HALF of that.

    However, on a lighter note, I don't see why the thermal pads (or whatever comes stuck to the AMD heatsinks) are any better. I could be wrong (and I most likely am), but I was under the impression that thermal grease, even cheap thermal grease, is better than the pads they put on those things.

  118. Re:Implied Warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some locales have implied warranties for all products sold. They specify minimum periods of time the manufacturers must warrant their products. It is normally a limited warranty, that is designed to protect consumers by ensuring that a product does what the manufacturer claims. These implied warranties can not avoided, regardless of what the manufacturer claims.

  119. Re:Well they better be putting hell of a cooler on by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

    i haven't had any problems with my 1.33, all im using is one of those Volcano II's, a couple of case fans, and a topside blowhole. Nothing fancy, just the stock fans that came with my Lian-Li.

  120. Re:I really am quite astonished by sl3xd · · Score: 1

    there is a warranty for broken/melted cores because sometimes fans fail to cool, even during normal use. Trust me, if your proc ever dies, you'll be glad for that warranty

    I'd like to second this; there is also another reason why I will never buy an OEM CPU again: From three different places, I recieved OEM CPU's that were 'raised', meaning that they had the original speed removed, and a higher speed stamped on.

    I never overclock; but these CPU's were behaving horribly! One even (no kidding) overheated enough to melt (and seize) the heatsink fan into the heatsink... making things get even hotter. By the time I noticed anything was wrong (weird smell...), my motherboard was hot enough for several components came unsoldered and fell out when I removed the cover from the case! (Being quick of reflexes, but frequently slow of wits, I reached out to grab these scalding hot components...) Upon closer analysis, this CPU was found to have been 'raised'. To make matters worse, the place wouldn't refund/replace anything because "We don't warranty OEM CPU's for more than 7 days past the date of purchase" -- and what do you know-- it took 8 days after I purchased it for them to even ship it. (Thank you pricewatch!) Better Business Beaureau? Ha! They coudn't have cared less. And I didn't have money for a lawyer.

    So you can imagine that I am actually pleased to hear that AMD is going to use anti-overclocking tech; I had no intention of ever overclocking, and yet because some shmuck broke a few laws and sold me a raised CPU, I had a horribly unstable PC that eventually melted itself.

    I've long since decided that I will gladly pay the extra lettuce for the warranty, and to buy the CPU from a more expensive, but well-known retailer. I've offered to pay the price difference for friends who wanted to go with a cheaper OEM CPU (since I end up repairing it and/or taking the blame anyway...) There's also the fact that the 'retail' CPU's are packaged entirely differently, and at least the Athlon XP's I've looked at, have a different color to the die when compared with the OEM CPU's (greenish vs. brownish); I can go to CompUSA or even Amazon and feel confident that I am getting the CPU I paid for, and not some clock-raised fire hazard fraud from Skeeter's PC hut.

    In fact, I'm much more confident of AMD honoring the warranty on a retail CPU that has thermal grease and a custom heatsink than I am of any PC builder honoring the non-existent warranty on an OEM CPU. And, considering my past experiences with OEM CPU's (I have three Athlon 1.4's that are utterly toasted; worth a pretty penny 18 months ago...) with them, I'm also much more confident that the OEM CPU will fail first. This is reasonable, as I have been through four OEM Athlon 1.4's, on three different motherboards; the longest one lasted was 6 months. But the Retail CPU has been ticking for several times longer than that, and still has given me no problems.

    In fact my favored local system builder, who actually uses retail CPU's rather than the OEM's in their computers, still uses custom heat-sinks and thermal paste.

    And seriously -- I have a quiet power supply; Enermax is known for this, and I paid for the silence...

    And yet the enermax PSU still covers up AMD's heatsink fan completely; button up the case and the only thing you're hearing is the PSU and 2 Enermax intake fans.

    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  121. For Sale: AMD heatsinks by dargaud · · Score: 2, Funny

    THis is a shameless plug, but still on topic: I have 23 AMD heatsinks + fans for sale, without the processors. Anyone interested contact me...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  122. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where were you when i was building my system? that advice really could have come in handy

  123. Who else? by LeoDV · · Score: 1

    My homebuilt 2200+ box's got thermal grease on the CPU. Who else is it too late for? I wonder if this measure is retroactive...

  124. No big deal by red5 · · Score: 1

    Overclocking voids the warranty too and non retail box chips (OEM) have no warranty either. Taking that into consideration how many of us are actually covered? Be honest.

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  125. AMD Approved List by LamerX · · Score: 1

    I think this article may be full of it. Most AMD resellers have a complete list of AMD approved heat sync / fans.

    Here is just a sample off of AMDs web site...

    http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/SellAMDProdu ct s/0,,30_177_6798_8903,00.html

    1. Re:AMD Approved List by LamerX · · Score: 1

      Oh I just found the Complete List of Approved Heat Syncs... They do honor the warranty if you use these...

      http://www.amd.com/gb-uk/Processors/TechnicalRes ou rces/0,,30_182_869_4348%5E4356,00.html

  126. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by kcarlile · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tip... I just bought one of those for my Athlon-now-I'll-void-my-warranty-1400. Personally, I think that perhaps they should have an approved list of heatsinks and paste. AFter all, some 3rd party heatsinks are total crap, but many are better than the block-o-aluminum that AMD gives you. On the other hand, I'm sure that you can void your Apple warranty by replacing the monster heat sinks on those.

  127. I'm not sure I agree by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty okay with a car company saying that if you overhauled your car, it's your responsibility to deal with it if it breaks. Even if you were responsible, proving so would require them to go through each of your dozen amateurish modifications to find and prove which one caused the problem, which raises the cost for the rest of us.

    Now granted, there's some reasonable middle between "can't touch it without voiding the warranty" and "manufacturer has to honor the warranty even if you turned your car into a rice rocket," but I certainly oppose the latter.

  128. Unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the standard fan and a 2100. For the first couple of months after put it in in December it ran fine. However in the recent rush of warm weather when I do anything that puts a heavy load of the CPU, e.g. compiling stuff or playing games the temp quickly goes above 80 degrees and the computer crashes. The only way to stop this atm is to lower the frequency from 133 to 100, so I'm effectively running a 1500 instead of a 2100. I'm going to have to put some other fan/heatsink combo in there. Otherwise by summer I'll be able to roast marshmallows over the top of my case.

  129. stupid of AMD ... but irrelevant... if you oc by atarione · · Score: 1

    If you OC ur warr is already void (technically) so who cares, I like a huge percent of AMD owners am OC'ing my amd proc's... If I burn one I'll just go out and get another one for $60 I would be pissed about this if I was buying a $$$ Barton 2800XP or higher, but heck for $59 my Tbred B 1800XP is kicking butt @ 1.8Ghz (going to O/C higher soon...need better RAM). Honestly I don't give a damn about their warranty even if I burn this 1800XP ... I'll just go buy another one, for $60 I can afford to kill a couple of em' (which I have yet to do to even one...) I still think it is a stupid move because the 'Pump-Out' only seems to occur at temp cycles of 0-100C or higher... but if your proc is at 100C your pretty much toast already? What would suck is buying an OEM proc, which is DOA, and then not being able to return it cause you have used AS3? But I have yet to hear a case of a DOA return being denied for this reason? Anyway I'd just like to say this not withstanding AMD ownz, for less than the cost of a 2.0 P4, I got an 1800XP and Soltek SL-75FRN-RL (nf2) motherboard. And even with the craptastic DDR 2100 I'm running right now it is kicking butt.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  130. A quick note on warranty lengths by jlechem · · Score: 1

    While this is interesing anyone notice how long the average CPU warranty is? I think most are around 90 days from the manufacturer. Your PC shop may give you longer but the actual hardware maker itself doesn't give you shit. So what are the odds of a fan dieing in 90 days anyway unless there's a serious defect to beging with. Also I think Intel says the same thing, certain modifications not approved by them will void your warranty.

    --
    Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
  131. That's a good point about computer manufacturers by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    Seriously, that puts things into perspective: You void your warranty by upgrading your memory, and your bootup will forever after inform you that your case has been breeched. But we're used to that crap, and it occurs to no one to put that on the front page.

    Compared to that, AMD's decision seems quite reasonable. Not that I like it, but I understand it. They notice that many of their chips go to replace processors destroyed by some overanxious 0verclockerz who claim "the chip was fried when it got here." Basically, this is an official excuse to deny them a warranty replacement (since it's hard to do an autopsy on a dead processor).

    I think what they're hoping for is that people just stop trying to invoke their warranties and sheepishly buy one of their newer and better chips as a replacement.

  132. direct die liquid cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what if i cool my cpu with liquid directly onto the core........
    no voided warrenteeeeeeeeeeeee for me :)

  133. Why not have an 'approved' list? by rsmeds · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that the best compromise for AMD would be to have a list of 'AMD approved' heatsinks and greases, from which you could choose freely without voiding the warranty.

  134. Lame website? by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or anyone else has found the Xtreme Tek site suspicious to the point of intolerability?
    Their name is probably a play on the well-known ExtremeTech. After seeing a huge banner featuring a scantily-clad girl in a horizontal position, I closed the window without waiting for download to finish. Thank you, but my standards of acceptance typically require a bit more ingenuity.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    1. Re:Lame website? by WebMasterP · · Score: 1

      Nah man, I've been around a lot longer than 'ExtremeTech'. In fact, when I first registered my domain name, I had the decision between: ExtremeTech, ExtremeTek, XtremeTech, and XtremeTek (they were all available too). I choose the latter. I'm sorry you don't like that ad, UGO does the advertising for me. I wish they would put more of the Dell, ATI, and Intel ads up there, but lately they have been putting crap like '80's t-shirts' and shoot this clothing item to win a condom. It pisses me off more than you, I guarantee it.

  135. how long before it trickles down? by moankey · · Score: 1

    Friend of mine goes to Fry's Electronics a glorified West Coast Radio Shack for computer folks for present day. Anyway, he always buys their $5.00 warranty and has so far burned 3 AMD's because of his own stupidity, no thermal compound, forgot to attach heatsink, and cracked the core. Each time they replaced it no questions. Im sure they send it back to AMD.
    So how long before AMD's policy alters their in store $5.00 policy?

  136. This isn't quite what it said! by grahamtriggs · · Score: 1


    Yes, it did specifically mention (a) thermal grease, which if used would void the warranty.

    But whilst it mentioned that using a HSF other than that supplied might void your warranty, as I understand it, it says that it would *if* used to overclock the processor.

    If that is correct, then it might be better to have not said anything about HSFs, as it appears to cause confusion - overclocking your processor will void your warranty, stock HSF or not.

    As for the thermal grease, I can partly understand where they come from - why should they 'allow' you to use a grease that can damage the processor if applied incorrectly? Any damage that would cause is your responsibility, not theirs.

    However, they do have their argument a little back to front. They don't want us to use high-performance components, because it allows for overclocking? But it can only allow for overclocking, by improving cooling efficiency - something that would *benefit* the life of the CPU, even when run at stock speed... particularly in a heatwave!

  137. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    When I built my Athlon systems, AMD supplied some
    kind of thermal grease with the boxed CPUs! I
    chose to use Arctic Alumina instead, which is
    ceramic. No problems, so far (about a year).

  138. I don't see the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, ok, AMD are trying to save a few dollars here and there, is that so bad? How much did you save on your last AMD CPU compared to an intel?

    I'm sure AMD is swamped with indirect customer returns due to badly installed heatsinks, squashed dies and fried CPU's most of which could probably be avoided by a policy like this. Thus saving AMD money, and probably YOU money.

    I would have prefered that had compiled a recommended list of heatsink/fans which they would accept as warranty compatible.

    I'm sure I break at least 2 warranties on various products everyday! Every company does it, it protects their product from a bad reputation due to faulty third party products.

    Anyway, enough of my ranting, I still love ya AMD, tho' I aint using your stinkin' heatsinks.

  139. Re:Grease? Feh. TIM pads, baby! by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    Uhm, boxes of latex gloves are dirt cheap and you
    can also use them for refilling ink cartridges,
    or committing crimes (I guess). :^)

    Seriously, after the research I did when building
    some Athlon systems last fall, the wax pads are
    NOT the way to go. Weighing all the options I
    went with Arctic Alumina (ceramic material) from
    Artic Silver. Dirt cheap (shop around), and no
    regrets.

  140. Midges too... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Those of you who have been to Scotland, particularly Skye or Ullapool (two areas that are particularly bad) will doubtless have encountered the infamous Highland Midgie. These fearsome beasties are about 2mm long and look harmless enough, but appear to be equipped with diamond-tipped drills on their teeth. The only thing that stops them (and isn't horribly carcinogenic or a respiratory irritant, and doesn't strip paint off things you walk past) is Skin-So-Soft. There's a huge stand of it in my local agricultural store, fishing boats buy it in gallon buckets, and you'll always find a tube tucked away somewhere in builders' vans and tractor cabs...

  141. Re:I really am quite astonished by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    Uhm, just because you use a thermal product and
    better (ie, 3rd party) heatsink/fan combo does
    NOT mean you are overclocking. I used those
    things with my boxed Athlons, and I've never
    overclocked. I just want a cool (temperature
    wise) system.

  142. Government and Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly doubt that California's involvement in business practices has greatly added to a $30 billion deficit.

    Besides, governments often have to play a crucial role as watch dog to regulate businesses, such as Enron. Wasn't it deregulation of the power industry in California that has contributed to such a great deficit?

  143. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    My bad. AMD included a tape or wax type thingy,
    not thermal grease. Hey, its late...

  144. WD40 and other chemwash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    especially since wd40 may have implications for your
    electic flows if not applies sparingly, plus its a very very crouchy substance that may suck itself into your cpu socket pins for capilary effects.

    KEEP WD 40 AWAY...

    do what i do - go over to chemtonics an order some electrowash CZ.
    its a mixture of
    1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroe-thane(811-97-2) Cirozane (mixture), Carbinol(67,56,1)

    http://www.chemtronics.com/catalog/catalog.cgi?a ct ion=list_products&category=2

    warning on the side: this stuff is health hazardous an will degrease about anything,
    including hands and eyes.
    its e.g. used by sun microsystems, sgi and others.

    you can use either kimwipes (Kimberly-Clark) or some of chemtronics stuff
    http://www.chemtronics.com/catalog/catalog. cgi?act ion=list_products&category=15
    for the wiping off, other than q-tips or cotton,
    they are ANTI-STATIC and LINTFREE.

    the other approach suggests a pighair brush.

  145. Re:That's a good point about computer manufacturer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, If the chip isn't fried, it is made of glass... just drop it and say the "ups/fedex guy musta broke it" If they paid the extra $X to insure then a simple phone call explaining that "well it's made out of glass, and it broke in shipping, and it was insured..." and you've got a replacement cpu for $0 -- as long as it hasn't been that long since you got it.

  146. Who said porn movies? by koutkeu · · Score: 1

    http://www1.zkm.de/%7Ewvdc/ascii/java/ Another type of ascii movies !

  147. you being sarcastic? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    ..wasn't sure...

    Government imposed quality regulations only hurt the industry.

    Thats not always the case. I don't think you'd find too many people that would bash the FDA and the FCC for making sure that you can buy food thats not poisoned and drive from New York to California without having to change radios because of different broadcast standards.

    They make it so companies don't want to improve quality, they make the barrier to entry lower for quality, and they put companies who've built a good names for themselves on the same level as some new startup who just happens to meet the minimums.

    How is the enforcement of warranties a disinsentive to improving quality? Haven't you ever seen a car ad that totes its ratings on government saftey tests?

    Note to consumers, don't be an idiot, do some research on the product you buy before you buy it.

    That assumes that you have plenty of choices to choose from. But what if you don't have a choice? Look at the hard drive manufacuters that want to drop drive warranties to a year. If they all did it, how could you take your money somewhere else?

    And having plenty of choices can be a bad thing in the grand scheme of things. Look at HDTV standards: last time I checked there were about 40. Few consumers are willing to purchase such sets because they don't want to spend $2,000 (for a cheap one) only to have it cease working when a different standard becomes available. Constrast that to if they FCC had dictated a standard 10 years ago. Manufacturers could have rolled out HDTV years ago and consumers wouldn't have been afraid to buy them. In cases like that, regulation's better for consumers and industry.

  148. Probably not gonna get an AMD again... by Smid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought a couple before, they worked fine. After of course some heatsink tweaking to stop it crashing all the time. Then I found this statement somewhere:

    "Be very careful if you want to install AMD CPU's yourself, because the AMD warranty policy became very severe. Guidelines from AMD: '' NO warranty on mechanical damage of the CPU like bent or broken pins, cracked dies or packages. NO warranty on manipulated CPU's by e.g. overclocking. No warranty on overheating e.g. caused by use of non-recommended (www1.amd.com/athlon/config) or improperly mounted coolers (www.amd.com/products/cpg/athlon/pdf/23986.pdf). or by overclocking or use of core voltage different from the datasheet. You can recognize overheating by e.g. brown spots on bottom side of the CPU, different colors on the chip surface, destroyed support pads, head conducting pastes spread all over the package. Especially no warranty for findings like: open/short at Vcc- or I/O pins, Micro Cracks (invisible cracks), when part is fully functional. ''"

    Why is their warranty very severe? And why are they backing off thermal grease and non approved heatsinks? Because they have a severe overheating problem, and their design is certainly not rugged enough to bear any type of slip or mistake. With some investigation I realise that most of my friends with AMDs have overheating problems, one running 10 fans in the case to get it 55 degrees.

    You get what you pay for, and AMD is cheap. Their stock heatsinks are crap, and some of the design decisions they've taken are flawed. Ho hum.

    Its sad, but next one for me is a intel. At least it might still be running on a sunny day, rather than setting fire to the house...

  149. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by tamyrlin · · Score: 1, Interesting
    For a more illuminating look at how bad thermal grease really is with regards to heat transfer I recommend a look at http://www.dansdata.com/goop.htm

    Toothpaste was actually better at transferring the heat than arctic silver. (Not that toothpaste would be a good solution in the long run :))

  150. +1 informative ass kicking by version5 · · Score: 1

    Wow. You totally kicked cheezedawg's ass! That was cool.

    --

    "It's Dot Com!"

  151. OEM v. Aftermarket can't void a warranty! by cenonce · · Score: 1

    Seems to me this is analagous to an auto manufacture trying to void your warranty for using, say, a FRAM oil filter instead of an OEM. This seems like an especially dumb policy in the instance of a fan that meets or exceeds AMD's own specs, or is "AMD recommended". If they recommend it, how can they say it is unacceptable to use!?!

    I don't think this policy won't last long... all it will take are a couple of irate customers.

    -A

    1. Re:OEM v. Aftermarket can't void a warranty! by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Not quite a good analogy. There are significantly fewer manufacturers of oil filters than there are brands of oil filters. Most are just private labels of larger makers. Also, Should your manufacturer invalidate a warranty claiming it was due to a Fram filter.. well.. Fram will replace the engine under their warranty. Even if your out of warranty Fram will repair the damage if caused by a defective filter. Likely a better chance of a positive outcome.

  152. my AMD Duron... by alizard · · Score: 1
    as part of a motherboard set was shipped to me with a small tube of thermal grease. I put on a thin coat and installed the chip, and I spent a few extra bucks for a better fan.

    Presumably, the reseller tried it the AMD way and found itself getting too many burned up chips back.

    So they require phase change pads and stock fans?

    Sounds like they're more interested in selling replacement CPUs than making customers happy. Maybe they've got an Intel mole who comes up with bright ideas like this.

    Too bad VIA floating point performance isn't that hot... because their chips don't require a whole lot in the way of cooling. Yes, suspecting that there's a relationship between these two facts has occurred to me.

    If I'd been buying for a server, I would have bought the VIA chip. I went with the Duron because I do graphics on this thing once in a while and big bitmaps run. . . slowly.

  153. I wonder by anethema · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Shin Etsu G-751 would be an acceptable grease, beeing it is from the same company as the recomended by the article (I can only assume this is true, because the editor said so..right guys?....guys?), and is also non-metallic.

    The reason I care is because this particular grease is (again) non-metallic, outperforms Arctic silver 3, is non conductive, etc.

    If you dont believe me (so many people dont seem to), here is a LINK to a review of thermal compounds, and the shin-etsu comes out on top.

    HERE and HERE are places to buy it, i looked since it seems to be kind of hard to find.

    Either way, it would be nice, despite the fact that any overclocking, using non stock heatsinks, tinkering of almost any kind..all void your warranty. People RMA stuff after they fry it OCing anyways, been done before, will keep beeing done in the future.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  154. AMD suggests by terrox · · Score: 0

    if you do what they suggest it will just get noisier and noiser until it breaks. Which is what mine is doing now as I steadily go deaf from my underclocked AMD Cpu using AMD fan... Wooo Athlon 1600+ running at less than normal bus speed at 1.1Ghz just to stop it crashing..

  155. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    I fitted a Zalman heatsink (QuietPC.com) to my Athlon, it came with quite a lot of thermal paste preapplied, so I wondered if I should take some off, since I agree with your point about not using too much. I chickened out and convinced myself I'd done the right thing by not wiping any away on the grounds that as long as the paste could flow, the stupidly high pressure applied when mounting should squeeze most of it out

    According to libsensors, it runs at 57C idle (with ambient inside the case at 33C), rising to 70C at full load (encoding stuff). Since the chip dissipates 72W, that doesn't sound too bad, albeit it still seems a bit on the high side. Did I do wrong? I dunno.

  156. "No grease for you!"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were these the words burnt into this man's mind before it began?

    Oh, the humanity!

  157. Re:Well they better be putting hell of a cooler on by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

    You're absolutely right. Even some of the most powerful heatsinks on the market have trouble cooling Athlons without heat transfer compound. If AMD expects us not to use good thermal grease like Arctic Silver, they'd better back up their with one hell of a cooler to make up for it.

  158. Fan replacement doesn't = heat sync replacement by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Informative

    "In a surprising turn of events, this article over at Xtreme Tek explains that the official stance from AMD is that you will void your warranty if you use any thermal grease or if you're not using the heatsink provided with your CPU."

    What I don't fully understand is the gripe about those who buy in the retail box who have fans that are inadquate and need replacement? Doesn't it say "heatsink" not fan? Now I don't know about anyone else in here, but can't you just replace the fan with a series of 4 screws?

    While yes, they make BETTER syncs, users who's fan has failed on the stock heat sync, who have no complaints about the present heat sync, provided their replacement fan is within the same size, speed, and airflow specifications don't have anything to worry about (in theory).

    Personaly, I find it "much" easier removing 4 sheetmetal screws then dealing with the cpu clip anyday!

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Fan replacement doesn't = heat sync replacement by sn0wcrash · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know.. I'm being picky here... but... Your actually reffering to a machine screw. High number of threads per inch and non tapered. Exactly the opposite of a sheetmetal screw.

    2. Re:Fan replacement doesn't = heat sync replacement by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      "I know.. I'm being picky here... but... Your actually reffering to a machine screw. High number of threads per inch and non tapered. Exactly the opposite of a sheetmetal screw."

      Hmmm, you could be right, I just looked at my xp-2000+ and it's entirly possible that they used machine screws.

      Usually when I think about fans on heatsyncs, I think of screws that sorta wedge them selfs between the fins, which calls for a tapered low thread per inch/cm, i.e. sheetmetal screws.

      Are you nitpicking, well yea, but the use of machine screws limit the number of options for fan sizes, so it's a valid nitpick. Error due to the fact that the fan on my XP has not yet failed, hince i've not replaced it.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  159. Penny smart, pound stupid. by Henry+Stern · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's too bad that AMD has taken this stance with their warranties. Comparatively speaking, there can't be that many people who go nuts with the thermal grease and heat sinks, and even less so the number of people who actually mess up their CPUs.

    For customer relations' sake, it seems that their move was imprudent. Had they just decided to quietly replace a few CPUs and not make a fuss, they would have looked better as a "corporate citizen."

    They may be saving a few dollars down the road but the bad will that their move generated may have repercussions later. Slashdotters, are you mad enough to actually switch to another vendor?

  160. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Genom · · Score: 1

    Don't have a Zalman, but my Athlon 1600 runs between 42C (idle) up to around 55C (after a couple hours of UT2K3). For *my* machine, 57C idle would be quite high.

    You don't mention which model Athlon you're using, however. I'd imagine the faster you go, the higher the "acceptable" temperature range goes, up to a point.

  161. Nail polish remover? by Corvaith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just be careful picking it out, because some of them *don't* use acetone now.

  162. Sai Baba by joerg · · Score: 1

    These: Sai Baba Anti-these: Wahrheit (und Treue zum Dienen) Synthese: ? (Wahrheit um der Wahrheit willen suchen und offenbaren. Bedingungslos der GÖTTLICHKEIT im anderen und sich selbst dienen). ES IST ! Transzformationsstrahl ES IST ! FIS JOKER *** Diese Einschübe gebem dem Göttlichen in mir Raum. "Transzformationsstrahl ES IST ! " bildet ein Geistigen Gefäß in das die Göttliche Absicht hineinprojeziert wird. Ich schalte mich gleich mit der Göttlichen Absicht, bilde also einen Kelch und empfange bedingungslos was das Göttliche dort hineinlegen will. Das Schreiben bewirkt den RHYTMUS, das ich dies instinktiv IMMER AUTOMATISCH tue wenn ich/jemand dieses Transzformationsstrahl ES IST liest. ES IST ! Transzformationsstrahl ES IST ! FIS JOKER *** FIS ist der "Geheime Name" Eines Elohimprogrammes das für die Bildung der konkreten ERfahrungsebenen in der persönlichen Subjektivität der Menschheit zuständig ist. Mit "FIS" wird also ein persönliches ERfahrungspotenzial hervorgerufen. JOKER ist der Name eines Weiteren Elohimprogrammes, das diese Erfahrungspoltenziale vitalisiert und damit subjektiv erfahrbar macht und freisetzt. ES IST ! Transzformationsstrahl ES IST ! Alles Liebe Vywamus Ramana Simhanada FIS JOKER ***

  163. Schwarzer Kubus by joerg · · Score: 1
    Der Schwarze Kubus hat den Zweck unbewußte Göttliche Funken zu binden und zu sammeln.
    Für bewußte Geistfunken ist es die Hölle in einem Schwarzen Kubus zu sein.
    Nur durch eine Große Entsagung/Kreuzigung kann sich ein Geistfunke von sich aus, aus einem Schwarzen Kubus befreien.

    Wenn Intelligenz auf einen Schwarzen Kubus projeziert wird, entwickelt dieser Schwarze Kubus ein Eigenbewußtsein das sich dann immer Kryon/KREISCHTON nennt.

    Das Magnetische Gitter zu programmieren, ist das was man den Freien Willen der Menschheit nennt.

    NUR das Gruppenbewußtsein der Menschheit kann und darf das Magnetfeld der Erde programmieren.
    Um das konstruktiv zu tun müssen POSITIVE GEFÜHLE wie Liebe Freude Frieden etc. erzeugt werden.

    Anders gesagt das Magnetfeld der Erde spiegelt IMMER den Gesamtgefühlszustand der Menschen wider.

    Nun die Menschheit wollte in die Einheit hat dies "occult-technisch" aber völlig falsch angegangen. So wurde durch den starken Wunsch nach Einheit dann eben teilweise das Magnetfeld DURCH Kreischton von der Menschheit programmiert.

    Kreischton/"Kryon" ist also ein ELEMENTAL das von der Menschheit erschaffen wurde und die innere Kraft stammt TATsächlich von der Zentralsonne, weil nämlich DIE MENSCHHEIT von der Zentralsonne stammt...

    In Göttlicher Ordnung
    Sanat Kumara
    (Simhanada)

  164. Simhanada by joerg · · Score: 1

    Geschrieben von Sananda am 13. Juli 2002 23:10:15:

    1.
    Stelle mir einfach konkrete Fragen dann kann ich dich da abholen wo du stehst !

    Konkrete Fragen, kann ich gar nicht stellen, da ich praktisch kaum verstehe, was du da schreibst.

    1)

    Aber erzähle mal, was die Quelle deines Wissens ist. Ich meine Elemente der vedischen Lehre wiederzuerkennen, aber wohl auch nicht ausschließlich, habe aber davon eigentlich keine Ahnung.

    2)

    Meine Freundin hat den 3-teiler von Armin Risi gelesen, daher hab ich davon gehört, aber mehr auch nicht.
    3)

    Wenn du ausschließlich Kanäle öffnen wolltest, dann ist mein Einwurf, dass das wohl kaum einer versteht wohl nicht mehr so wichtig.
    Das was danach kommt, kann und will ich nicht werten, kenne weder dich noch die Texte.

    P.S. Woher kommt dein Name?
    Welchen Hintergrund hat er, warum hast du ihn gewählt?
    4)

    Liebe Elite
    Ich habe mal vier Punkte zusammengestellt ES IST !
    Transzformationsstrahl ES IST !

    zu 1)
    Dann frage danach WAS du nicht verstehst oder frage nach Begriffen die dich interessieren und erleutere was du davon verstanden hast !
    Damit ist eine geistige Norm für dich und für mich fixiert und auch die anderen können dann den ANfangspunkt der Disskusion nachvollziehen wodurch Mißverständnisse vermieden werden die darauf beruhen das man über die selben Begriffe spricht aber jeder was anderes unter den Begriffen versteht erfasst oder begreift !
    Das ist vor allem bei Dem Thema zu Jesus Christus SOOO wichtig da Jesus Christus MULTIDIMENSIONALIÄT gezündet hat !
    Damit muß man sich klar sein das JEDER sein eigenes Bild von Jesus Christus hat sowie das es VIELE Jesus Christusse gibt !

    Jesus Christus hat eine BEWUSSTSEINSnorm verkörpert !
    ES IST ! Somit das Recht jeder Seele die diese Norm ERreicht sich Jesus Christus zu nennen !
    Christus IST zuerst ein KOLLEKTIVES Symbol !
    Somit ist das was Christus auszeichnet ein VERWIRKLICHUNGSZUSTAND und nichts persönliches !
    Die Persönliche Verwirklichung gehört zum Heiligen Geist und der Heiligen Geistnatur=Buddhanatur in jedem Menschen ! ES IST !

    Der innere Buddha ist der personifizierte Heilige Geist während der Heilige Geist GRUPPENBEWUSSTHEIT IST !
    ES IST !
    Transzformationsstrahl ! ES IST !

    2)
    Nun ich habe im Subjektiven den ANfangskontext der Lehren der Brücke zur Freiheit oder in den ANfangsbüchern von Godfre Ray Kind:
    Die 33 Reden über das Ich bin !
    ES IST !
    Transzformationsstrahl ! ES IST !
    Dies sind SUBJEKTIVE Lehren .
    Das heißt sie sind sehr gut geeignet eine spirituellen WEG zu GEHEN !
    Aber sie sind NICHT gut geeignet um zu sie als philosofische Plattform zu benutzten weil sie PRAKTISCH sind und SUBJEKTIVE Realitäten beschreiben !
    Und dort wird NICHT beschrieben wie man das subjektive Objektivieren kann, sprich in sinnvolle Begriffe zu kleiden die man äußerlich zu ANderen Subjektiven Realitäten (Glaubenssystemen) kommunizieren kann !

    Für diesen Zweck der Begrifflichen Kommunikation studiere ich seit meiner inneren Durchbruch ("Aufstieg") Ende Oktober 1998 die Alice A. Bailey Bücher die GERADE als geistig Begriffliche Norm gegeben wurden ! ES IST !
    Transzformationsstrahl ! ES IST !
    ANsonsten meditiere ich sehr viel und bekomme mein Wissen AUSSSCHLIESSLICH REIN INNERLICH ! ES IST !

    Ich lese Bücher NUR um Begriffe für subjektive ERfahrungen bilden zu können !
    Und da sind die Alice A. Bailey Bücher für mich die optimale Norm !
    Aber ich lese ALLE Heiligen Schriften soweit sie mir "zufällig" aus dem Leben heraus begegnen.

    Die Bücher von Solara sind für ABSOLUT Zentral
    Und das Buch des Wissens die Schlüssel des Enoch sind meines ERachtens die aktuell gültige Lehre.
    Die Schlüssel des Enoch von JJ Hurtak sind vollst

  165. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by evocate · · Score: 2, Funny

    What you want to do is apply a thin bead of grease to one end of the CPU die, and spread it thinly across using a credit card or other device (driver's license, heavy piece of paper, etc).
    I used my AMD warranty registration card before I sent it in.

  166. hmmm, one solution... by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

    Sun Blades for home systems!

  167. AMD RMA ... by ozzy_cow · · Score: 1
    did anyone here ever RMA'd an AMD cpu before?


    I did and I never had any problems whatsoever. One time one of the technicians cracked the die by accident, but since the damage was not too apparent I got new cpu in 48 hours.


    Of course this was on reseller level, but since most cpu's were boxed (we get all higher end cpu's boxed for extended warranty) I dont think there would be much difference for the end user

  168. This is the same AMD by Ghengis · · Score: 1

    That ships thousands of faulty fans in their Retail boxes, so now there's no way to avoid their slip-ups (well, you COULD pay for an Intel, but..)

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  169. Bare bones... by blixel · · Score: 1

    Interesting news. This gives me yet another reason to buy a pre tested bare bones setup next time I decide to upgrade. Or even go as far as to have the system completely built and ran through the a burn-in cycle. You don't have to sacrifice getting a custom built system either. I've found several custom builders online who provide a wide range of high quality components such as Lian-Li cases and Asus motherboards. I haven't yet reached the point of laziness that I'd be willing to buy a pot luck system from Best Buy. Allthough with PC prices as low as they are, and with CPU speeds and RAM doubling every year, it is sometimes tempting to go with a Dell.

    The point (obviously?) being if CPU manufacturers are going to be so stringent with their products, then I may be better off letting resellers deal with the manufacturer so I will just have to deal with the reseller. That may very well be what AMD wants to achieve in the first place.

  170. Acetone -- No threat to my peeps! by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1

    http://www.peepresearch.org/solubility/acetone.htm l

    --
    Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
  171. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    Look here for CPU info Mine is a 1400 MHz Thunderbird, 133 MHz FSB so I'd expect it to be hot, but your 1600 MHz takes about teh same amount of power, so my heatsinking isn't as efficient. (I don't have the flower cooler, but the cheaper ducted quiet fan thingy - maybe it isn't a Zlaman after all, but I recall it came from QuietPC) OTOH, I do have a 20C to 25C margin of error remaining, so AMD expect this puppy to cook!

  172. Lets see... by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    I am a single guy, no girlfriend, no fingernail polish remover anywhere nearby. Opposed to this, I walk to my garage and get my can(s) of WD40. Point in case. You might live in a city and therefore have no garage, but I'm sure you've had problems with squeaky doors.

    EITHER WAY, USE WHAT YOU WANT to use. I'm not forcing you to use WD40, it just works for me. It's easy to clean off. It has not impaired any of my CPUS. Part B. I know what I'm doing. Part C, I don't feel like buying fingernail polish remover when I have the necessary tools AT hand. (40 or so footsteps away). Why waste 2 gallons of gas getting to a CVS or some other drug store when I got my thermal goo removing materials right nearby?

    THAT is what I was saying. Thank you for your time.

    -Daedalus

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:Lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 gallons of gas? Where the hell do you live where the nearest conveniance/drug store is 30-60 miles away? Do they even HAVE computers in this neather region you dwell in?

  173. Re:Don't do this! by Technician · · Score: 2, Insightful

    spread it thinly across using a credit card
    Spreading the grease is a bad idea. It puts ridges and valleys in the grease. When the parts are mated, the trapped air pockets create voids. Not a good idea. Always put a small dab in the center of the die and set the heatsink on it. Apply pressure and lock into place. The blob flattens out forcing all air out ahead of the grease. This prevents hotspots that lead to die failure. Don't remove the heatsink to inspect it. If you ever remove the heatsink, completely clean it and start over. You don't want air pockets in the grease.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  174. The Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act by foxtrot · · Score: 1

    ...puts the burden of proof on AMD to prove that your upgrade was what caused the processor to die. I suspect they know this, and I also suspect if you raise enough of a ruckus you can get your processor replaced, as it's not worth going to court over. They're probably just betting most folks won't raise much cain about it.

  175. This is being blown way out of proportion by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1
    I've been using Arctic Silver for years. Never had a problem with it.

    I've been using AMD CPUs for years. Never had one fail.

    Technically speaking, most people using Arctic Silver are probably voiding their warranty in other ways as well (non-approved heatsinks, overclocking, XP->MP mods, etc.). So why all the fuss about thermal compound all of a sudden?

    How many people know someone who has had an RMA on a CPU refused for the explicit reason that they used the "wrong" thermal compound? I sure don't know anyone.

    Go ahead and keep using your "unapproved" thermal compound and heatsinks -- I certainly plan to. And in the (IMO very unlikely) event that you do need to RMA the CPU, chances are excellent there won't be a problem anyway.

  176. Actually... by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

    Solvents are generally categorized into polar and non-polar solvents (water being a good example of the former, and benzene a good example of the latter).

    It all has to do with the kind of substances you are trying to mix, or put into solution (polar, ionic, covalently-bonded, etc), and your solvent of choice... oil and water do not mix because water is unable to adequately penetrate and dissolve the long, largely non-polar hydrocarbon chains that make up most oils (the oil is more attracted to itself than it is to the water). you are correct that oil and water don't mix, and polarity is the reason. The best you could hope for would be some kind of suspension.

    Emulsifiers can create the appearance of solubility... but that's another lecture.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Actually... by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 1

      oil and water do not mix because water is unable to adequately penetrate and dissolve the long, largely non-polar hydrocarbon chains that make up most oils (the oil is more attracted to itself than it is to the water).

      You got that backwards, dude. Oil and water don't mix because water is more attracted to itself than it is to oil. Breaking the water-water hydrogen bond would require more energy than you gain from forming a water-hydrocarbon interaction, so it doesn't happen (or, that's the stripped-down thermodynamic way of looking at it).

  177. I'm with you on Naphtha by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Another plus point in it's favour is that it's very easy/cheap to get hold on - it's what liquid fueled cigarette lighters run on. If you're feeling sneaky you can use it to make envelopes 'invisible' before it evaporates leaving no trace.

  178. Re:Grease? Feh. TIM pads, baby! by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > Since it doesn't make a difference what the hell you use to stick your heatsink onto your CPU--hell, toothpaste works just as well as AS-3 [dansdata.com]--I'll stick with the easy stuff.

    Well, the toothpaste would probably dry out and fail after a few months, so I wouldn't recommend it. (I agree with your contention that the brand of goop doesn't matter, though!)

    I'm intrigued by your TIM comments. I've avoided TIMs because older CPUs didn't really have a lot of pressure on the pad. With the new XPs and P4s, maybe it's time to rethink that.

    Got any links that demonstrate similar OCability or better temps with TIMs versus goop?

    I imagine (imagine, not "know"!) it being "easier" to trap a bubble of air between a largish TIM like the one used on the P4, and the heatsink. Yeah, it can happen with goop too, but if you get crappy temperatures, it's easier to fix with goop.

    Anyways - has anyone found a difference between goop and TIM in terms of cooling performance (i.e. overclockability), over a large enough sample, to say that maybe it really *is* time for all us 31337 d00dz to give that gummy pad a second chance?

  179. "thermal grease" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is thermal grease? Doesn it run Linux?

  180. Good excuse to reject kinky Pentiums.. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Hate that thermal-pad s**t... doesn't give you much space for error if you mess things up attaching the heatsink, like I did.

    Call me a sceptic, but isn't this very convenient for them if you mess up the pad and have to reattach the heatsink with something else?

    BTW, for what it's worth, I did that to my Pentium 4; not only does it work fine with the cheapo grease I bought after panic-rushing into town, but more significantly, it runs even with a noticable *kink* at one side (and yeah, I was responsible when I almost squashed it with the heatsink in the first place).

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  181. ALL OF YOUR ARE INCORRECT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LISTEN UP!!!

    The e-mail sent to Xtreme Tek was NOT an official statement from AMD.

    I repeat:
    The e-mail sent to Xtreme Tek was NOT an official statement from AMD.

    That e-mail was sent from Steve Knauber, who has no rights to release an official statement!

    STOP SAYING that AMD put out this statement.

    I am supprised at how weak some people are.

    It is correct that NO THERMAL GREASE is recommended.
    This it due to particles in the grease that can cause malfunctions, whether electrical, or mechanical.
    Does that mean Greases void your warrenty?
    NO!!!!!!
    It means that they are not recommeneded for permenent installations.
    AS STATED IN THE E-MAIL!

    Phase change substanced such as, but NOT limited to Shin Etsu G 749, are better than greases for long term installation.

    Phase change turns to a liquid once heated and will fill in the spaces between the die and heatsink.

    Once installed and heated the phasechange will not cause wear to the die, will not pumpout due to vibrations from the CPU fan.

    BUT STOP SAYING THAT AMD HAS RELEASED THIS AS AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS JUST PURE STUPIDITY.

  182. Re:Two words...What about the ceramic?? by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    It's easy getting AS II or III off of the CPU die, but what about getting it off of the wafer. Sometimes, as I try to smooth out the goop to get a thin smooth layer it falls of the edge. I use something my pocket knife to get it off, but still, I might bump it on the ceramic and get some on the sides. I can take the AS off the ceramic wafer, but it leaves a stain that I cannot get off. I use detergent, rubbing alcohol, and nail polish remover. What will get it off?? Maybe WD-40??

  183. To the Editors Mods and stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I humbly request that this article be filed as both. Ask Slashdot "How to remove your unapproved heatsink grease when returning 'Defective' CPU's" and AMD "AMD: No Grease For You

  184. OEM chips Not under waranty by NedTheNerd · · Score: 1
    not sure if this has allready been said but the AMD OEM chips are NOT under waranty. it is the resellers or manufaturers responsibility to take care of the waranty. now this is the SAME for intel so dont get your panties in a huff just because amd has a crappy waranty and intel doesnt. . .

    here is an article on overclockers.com talking about this besides are tehy really gona know if you used a diffrent fan?
    http://www.overclockers.com/tips00357/

  185. Software and liability law by Phronesis · · Score: 3, Informative
    How do you see this applying to software product liabilities?

    There have been cases where software bugs in medical equipment killed people. In those cases, there would be strong precedent for product liability lawsuits.

    Suppliers to the military are harder to sue, which is probably good news to the folks whose bugs killed soldiers when their mortar targeting software made incorrect assumptions about target altitude or when a Patriot missile targeting system's clock overflowed after 8 hours.

    For further reading on software liability issues, see this Business Week article, which was discussed on /. and badsoftware.com, which surveys software liability issues from a consumer's perspective.

  186. Thermal Grease by Alan+Cox · · Score: 1

    AMD put out notes about not using thermal grease on the newer processors to shops and distributors months ago. The document goes on to give what sounded like a reasonable explanation of what happens to thermal grease and how it gets pumped out over time by the heat.

    Suprised me when I saw it, but its old old news

  187. No one else... by ShavenYak · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is going to point out the obvious pun?

    Anyways, we decided to return the cpu, covered in grease, back to the local fry's

    So you got a greasy chip in your fries?

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  188. Universal solvent by leery · · Score: 1

    Distilled water. The cheap white paste stuff does dry out, and leaves you a lumpy surface that you need to clean off if you want to switch heatsinks. But distilled water and paper towels and air drying have always worked fine for me (or spit-wipe-blow if i'm in a hurry!).

    Pure H20 is also great for dissolving out coffee and soda in keyboard guts, too. For really bad messes, you can soak and rinse--it's the best way to thoroughly de-soda circuit boards, for example. (Obviously, dissasemble first!) No mess, no fumes, no grease, no residue. Just make sure everything's dry before you reassemble--let dry overnight, turn over, repeat. Use a hair dryer to speed things up or to make doubly sure. WD40 any mechanical bits.

    --
    "This is not a sig." -- R.
  189. Nyeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like AMD is only saying if for some reason your running your computer in fairly highstress environments (or highstress use) unless use AMD ThermalGo and AMD Heatsink they cant garantee validity of your claims. This is reasonable it'd be the same from apple if you built your own computer and passed it off as thiers.

  190. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really sick of hearing the toothpaste is better bs. If it's not good in the long run then there is no point. If the length of time the protection lasts didn't matter than I'm sure I could cool it much better than anything else out there but it would only live for 1 minute or so.

  191. Re:Two words...What about the ceramic?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use one of those really soft mechanical erasers. Takes the stuff off perfectly.

  192. AMD CPU fans are lousy by mrm677 · · Score: 1

    I've found the OEM fans included with AMD's retail chips are lousy. They spin at 5000RPM making them noisy and tend to get noiser over time and fail.

    I much prefer a larger 80mm fan spinning at 2500rpm to cool my processor.

  193. AMD: No Grease For You! by Grayswan · · Score: 1

    What is this supposed to mean? They are Frickin' Grease Nazis?

    Sign-ima-ture

    --
    If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
  194. That's OEM... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    If it breaks, you go to THEM to get it fixed/replaced, not to AMD.

  195. Warranty?? Who needs that? by gratefully+dead · · Score: 1

    When you've got an engineering sample CPU that you got from the company? There's no warranty on that!

  196. Shin Estu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shin Estu is the brand of "grease" that Honda Dealers use to fix sticking minivan doors on the Odyssey.

    So it must be good stuff - if you swap CPU's a lot, you should lube the pins with this stuff too!

  197. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sandpaper is a bad idea, the bottom of the heatsink is machined to be almost perfectly flat, though sometimes slightly concave or convex depending upon the CPU it's for. Using an abrasive will change the shape and make thermal transfer less efficiant. If you have a heatsink with larger than microscopic grooves, mount it on your forehead, it'll keep you cool in the summer.

  198. Re:Don't do this! by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you spread it out so thin that you can't see it, you've spread it out just about right. Here's how I do it, and I only get a 20 degree rise:
    1. use 1600-grit sandpaper on both the cpu and heat sink. Lap both, one at a time, using a piece of float glass as a base.
    2. Apply the smallest amount of grease on one edge of the cpu
    3. Using a new business card that has never been handled (your fingerprints will leave enough oil to interfere with the seating) spread the grease across the top of the cpu in 1 stroke, trying not to leave any behind
    4. If you have a visible layer of grease, you have too much. Wash, lap, re-apply
    5. insert cpu and heat sink. Do not touch surfaces w. anything (fingers, cotton swabs, etc all leave residues)
    6. power up and enjoy ...
  199. Yeah? So? by jridley · · Score: 1

    What's the problem with that? They're designed to run there. If it's actually unstable, then it's up to AMD to replace, if you're using the default heatsink and fan.

    If you just want it to run cooler, then why is 105 OK? Why not mount some stacked peltiers and go for 50F? It's gotta be better, right?

  200. Re:I really am quite astonished by eudas · · Score: 1

    "(ps: the above was an attempt at humor)"

    status: failure

    eudas

    --
    Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
  201. I don't see the upset about this by To0n · · Score: 1

    Being one who has always bought OEM and never had (too) much of a problem with OEM hardware, this doesn't bother me too much. In short, if you go the extra distance and pay the extra money for a retail CPU, you are being told basically "use this fan/heatsink combo, 'cause it does what we want it to do and meets the (minimum) standards we set for our product."

    Not too much of a concern for most people who build custom boxes for home personal use - You get a computer that you want, so you upgrade the crap out of it.

    At most, I feel that this is more of a problem for companies like Alien Ware or Zenatek. The ones that have the most to lose because they use AMD products in their products (custom comptuers).

    IANAL, but Hey, I'm also in CA, which protects my butt too.

    --
    blah
  202. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't recall AMD processors COMING with a warantee registration card.

  203. We are not incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the retail boxed AMD CPU Limited Warranty...

    "This limited warranty does not cover damages due to external causes, including improper use, problems with electrical power, accident, neglect, alteration, repair, improper installation, or improper testing

    This Limited Warranty shall be null and void if the AMD microprocessor which is the subject of this Limited Warranty is used with any heatsink/fan other than the one provided herewith."


    Since the provided heatsink/fan includes a thermal pad and AMD instructions say that a recommended TIM must be used and ONLY PHASE CHANGE PADS are on the recommended TIM list, using a thermal grease would be considered improper installation and WILL VOID THE WARRANTY.

  204. Well duh by Unregistered · · Score: 1

    If you're installing your own HSF you're pretty likely to fuck it up. If you do it's not AMD's fault and they don't want to have to rise prices because a few ididots keep melting their chips trying to install a coller to OC it. As much as everyone hates to admit it, a 3rd party HSF isn't necessary (if you want it istall at own risk).

  205. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny - laugh

  206. Re:Two words... Funny story related to this by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    They do sell spray cans of crap you can blow that stuff off with, you know. Go to an electrical technician's store. Give your whole board a good cleaning.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  207. Re:Don't do this! by Osty · · Score: 1

    When the parts are mated, the trapped air pockets create voids. Not a good idea. Always put a small dab in the center of the die and set the heatsink on it. Apply pressure and lock into place. The blob flattens out forcing all air out ahead of the grease. This prevents hotspots that lead to die failure.

    I'm going to have to disagree with this. First off, let's remember that thermal greases and pastes are malleable. Even if the spreading of the grease causes some hills and valleys, the ridges will flatten down into the valleys when the heatsink is applied. If you end up with trapped air pockets between the cpu and the sink after applying grease, you've got a problem -- your grease is stiff to the point where it won't flatten out (buy newer/better compound), you didn't apply enough grease (applying too much is just as bad, but for different reasons), or your sink doesn't have enough pressure to create good contact with the CPU die whether or not you have grease in place.


    The point of pre-spreading the grease is to make sure that you have enough to cover the die with a thin film, and not too much. If you just put a small blob on the die and let the heatsink spread it via pressure, you're either going to end up with way too much grease or not enough. If you don't check how the grease spread, you're not going to know whether you got sufficient application without overdoing it. But as you mentioned, checking means cleaning it up and doing it over again so that you get into a cycle where you basically practice several times until you're sure you know exactly how much grease you need to drop to ensure proper application. That seems like a waste of time and grease (and money, if you use the more expensive compounds).

  208. Problem with the fan by madhatter01 · · Score: 0

    I used the required fan, and it is LOUD AS HELL. I need an extra inch or two of Dynamat(R) before I would put this in my case.

    --

    I got this sig off of KaZaA this morning

  209. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "'Till then, you're still wrong unless you can find me evidence of cheaper Athlons, preferrably from reputable dealers, and from the same store, which you haven't done in even the slightest way."

    That would be cheaper Pentiums, of course.

  210. Don't keep WD-40 in the Bedroom by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    unless you want your girlfriend to get pregnant.. WD-40 can do ANYTHING.

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  211. Re:I really am quite astonished by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

    obivously not :P

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
  212. Caution, parent post needs qualifiers.. by neibwe · · Score: 1
    WD-40's applicability(n.) depends on the material (ceramic [cpu] vs metal [cpu block or heatsink]). However, toilet paper is not recommended. And IMHO Artic Silver is best used when one is dealing with extreme conditions (unusually[*] hot cpus, overclocking, or other specialized situations where you'll get a greater result than a mere 1-2 degrees.)
    2. ONLY Arctic Silver thermal compound should be between the processor core and the heatsink. Remove any thermal pads or other interface material from the heatsink before applying the Arctic Silver. Thermal pads can be scraped off with a plastic tool that will not scratch the bottom then the remnants can be removed with a xylene based cleaner, (Goof Off and some carburetor cleaners) acetone, mineral spirits, or high-purity isopropyl alcohol.

    ...Never use any oil or petroleum based cleaners (WD-40, citrus based cleaners and many automotive degreasers) on the base of a heatsink [emphasis mine --ed]. The oil, which is engineered to not evaporate, will fill in the microscopic valleys in the metal and significantly reduce the effectiveness of any subsequently applied thermal compound.[2]

    However, for ceramic cpu's WD-40 is okay:
    Any dish detergent (Dawn, Lux, Palmolive, Etc.) Do not use soap for an automatic dishwasher to clean a CPU. WD-40, citrus based grease removers (Goo Gone, Etc.) Xylene based products (Goof Off, some carburetor cleaners and many brake cleaners) Mineral spirits. (Be careful to keep the mineral spirits away from the core.) [3]
    Regarding the "toilet paper" usage in the parent post, Arctic's Instructions recommended that one "Clean...surfaces...with a low residual solvent...and a LINT FREE cloth."[emphasis theirs][4]



    _____________

    [*] Although with CPU die sizes and increasing power consumption, your typical high end desktop CPU might be considered "extreme".
    [1] Yes, I know, "the source", ydadda yadda blah blah... I read the instructions long before, and I remembered the WD-40 warnings, I should have double checked before I meta-moderated ;)
    [2] Arctic Silver (company). Instructions For Arctic Silver, Arctic Silver II, and Arctic Silver 3. Arctic Silver, Inc.(2003). [Thermal compound application(v.) instructions.] Available online:
    [3] Ibid.
    [4] Ibid.