Slashdot Mirror


Surviving Tornadoes

SharkJumper writes "We here in central Oklahoma, USA are just climbing out of the wreckage of another series of tornadoes. Unlike the tornadoes of May 3rd, 1999, which killed 47 and injured more than 800, we now have much better tornado information and prediction technology. Largely because of this, there have been far fewer injuries, and (as of this morning) no reported deaths. Here in the greater Oklahoma City area, we can even register our storm shelters with the city. After a severe storm, GIS technology is used to create a map for rescuers detailing location and type of the shelter as well as emergency contact information. Rescuers can then use these maps to search for survivors that may be trapped by debris in their shelters."

352 comments

  1. Tip #1 by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 4, Funny

    Being a big fat ass can actually increase your chances of survival.

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:Tip #1 by robslimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suppose. But being a wide-load also makes you a bigger target for flying debris.

      I live in Stillwater, OK and was watching the news very closely yesterday afternoon/evening just to make sure those twister weren't headed my way.

      Sure, the early warning systems are better, but the main improvements are:

      (1) Modern variants of doppler radar (and software for it) that can better identify wind velocities in terms of rotation and likelihood of funnel formation. However, the radar can rarely (if ever?) tell for certain if a rotation in a storm is actually a tornado or if it is on the ground.

      (2) Communication. The National Weather service and the Severe Storm labs in Norman work closely with radio and TV to get the info out about severe weather. But too often, they know to report actual tornados only after an eyewitness has called to report one on the ground.

      The one thing they do know fairly well is the conditions that could lead to tornado formation. But the presence of those conditions (as we can sense/interpret them now) does not tell us that there *will* be a twister or *where*.

    2. Re:Tip #1 by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      I'd think just the opposite. More surface area for the wind to grab.

    3. Re:Tip #1 by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, the radar can rarely (if ever?) tell for certain if a rotation in a storm is actually a tornado or if it is on the ground

      Actually to be entirely technical only when a funnel cloud touches down on the ground is it called a tornado... prior to that it's called a funnel cloud

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    4. Re:Tip #1 by eric6 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      i'm from stillwater (graduated SHS in 2000). did you grow up there?

      --

      --
      fight global cooling

    5. Re:Tip #1 by The+Monster · · Score: 1
      I've lived in KS since age 2 (before that just north of the NE border) and have been in the basement under a sturdy table while a tornado stripped off some of our shingles and took the lawnmower up the hill 3 houses - the neighbors called us after it was over and asked if that was our Lawn-Boy...
      However, the radar can rarely (if ever?) tell for certain if a rotation in a storm is actually a tornado or if it is on the ground.
      It doesn't matter. If there's sufficient rotation in a storm, whether there is a funnel cloud or not (much less whether it's touched down just now), what counts is that the funnel cloud can form and drop on your head in seconds. Yes, we get the occasional Tornado Warning issued for a storm that never produces a funnel cloud. But if you've ever seen how fast a funnel cloud forms, you'll be glad they issued the warning based on that rotation, instead of waiting until it's already on the ground tearing someone a new asshole.
      --

      [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
      SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    6. Re:Tip #1 by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      My suggestions include going outside with a parachute that's already open strapped to your back.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    7. Re:Tip #1 by windows · · Score: 1

      I'm a storm spotter. I'm in Saint Louis County (MO).

      Anyways, to answer your question, doppler radar has a radial velocity mode which detects the velocity of winds moving towards or away from the radar site. This is the tool used mostly to identify tornadoes by radar.

      Sometimes the reflectivity will indicate a "hook echo" which is also used to identify possible tornadoes.

      Anyways, through computers, the inbound and outbound velocities are added together in areas of rotation. If it exceeds 70 knots, it's considered a Tornado Vortex Signature (TVS). The TVS is not an actual tornado, but the parent circulation that can produce a tornado.

      Not every tornado will have a hook echo on radar. On the other hand, every tornado will have the parent circulation, which can be detected on radar. Not every TVS will spawn a tornado, though.

      To correct your points about communication, the NSSL (National Severe Storms Laboratory) does not issue watches or warnings. The SPC (Storm Prediction Center) in Norman issues all watches, but not warnings. The SPC was formerly the NSSFC (National Severe Storms Forecast Center), located in Kansas City.

      Your local NWS office issues the warnings. While storm spotters are very important (and will be necessary for a long time, even with better radar), the ability to detect potential tornadoes and severe storms has greatly improved in recent years. It's a lot better than you might think.

      If you look through tornado warnings issued by NWS offices, you'll note that most of them say that a storm with strong rotation has been indicated on radar. Rarely, if ever, will you see that a tornado warning has been issued because of spotter reports. It'd be more likely in the case of land/waterspouts and gustnadoes, but those aren't as dangerous as the usual tornadoes.

    8. Re:Tip #1 by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      > > However, the radar can rarely (if ever?) tell for certain if a rotation in a storm is actually a tornado or if it is on the ground

      > Actually to be entirely technical only when a funnel cloud touches down on the ground is it called a tornado... prior to that it's called a funnel cloud

      Technically, a tornado is defined as a circulation extending from ground level to the base of a thunderstorm. A funnel cloud need not be present for this to occur.

  2. Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't live where they happen.

    1. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Networkink*Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The best way to survive is not to be stupid.

      1) Know your surroundings
      2) If the sky is green, there's a problem.
      3) Have a plan
      4) Practice the plan
      5) Hang on for dear life

      --
      "How am I supposed to remember you, when you won't let me forget?" --Bare Naked Ladies
    2. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't live where they happen.

      And move to where?

      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes
      East coast? Hurricanes
      South? Hurricanes
      Northeast? Blizzards

      Everywhere has stupid weather. Just stupid in different ways.

      No, the best way to survive a tornado is not to live in a trailer park/tornado-hurricane magnet.

    3. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      The best way to survive is not to be stupid.

      5) Hang on for dear life

      there is irony here, somewhere....

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    4. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be the best way to _avoid_ tornadoes. Surviving tornadoes implies that you actually experience one.

      Dumbass

    5. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Grishnakh · · Score: 0, Troll

      Honestly, this is the best advice here, by far. If you live someplace where storms come by frequently and kill people, why the hell would you want to stay there? Even worse, these storms occur in the middle of the midwest, where the culture sucks and there's nothing to do, so it's not like there's any good reason to stay.

      I got tired of snow storms, ice storms, hurricanes, and all that crap when I lived on the east coast, so I moved to the southwest where there simply is no bad weather (other than being a little hot). No earthquakes, no tornados, no hurricanes, no blizzards; simply very few serious weather conditions to worry about. And with all the retired people moving to this part of the country every year (my county is one of the fastest-growing in the country), I'm not the only one that thinks this way.

    6. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the southwest. I'm talking new mexico and arizona here. The only thing we have is droughts -- and all that means is that you can't water your lawn.

      I've lived in northwestern new mexico and central new mexico. I've never heard of any crazy natural disaster in any area here. We do have some flash floods, but those really only catch rural areas and are very rare. Not to mention, they're not really floods. Its like a flood for the desert and lasts 10 minutes -- pretty weak all in all.

    7. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by dackroyd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And move to where?
      England has weather that's quite unlikely to kill you.

      Unless of course you find a winter season that lasts from September to June a bit too depressing and kill yourself.

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    8. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      well thats a fine idea.. let's just leave 5 or 6 states worth of the most fertile soil and large biodiversity uninhabited because the wind picks up a little every year.. okay.. 120 mph 20 times a spring. i grew up in Oklahoma City, lived in texas, louisianna, and now california. Oklahoma has lots of things to offer.. oil.. fossil records that would blow your mind.. mega renewable resources and the space to up production of those if necessary.. not to mention the PEOPLE that live there. Are you going to relocate them? Where exactly?

      Do you know how big tornado alley is? hint.. it's caused by a mixing of the cool winds from a certain moutain range, and a certain body of water on the south. alllll the land between is at risk.

      great idea.

      lets get to it

      pm

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    9. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tornados can come out of nowhere in a matter of minutes; I take it you've never lived somewhere they happen regularly, eh?

      The only good thing about where tornados tend to occur is that population is relatively sparse; so a few farm houses get hit or small communities, but rarely a big city. If you're out in the middle of nowhere, asleep, and you're too far from a siren to have any kind of advance warning, what will your plan be then?

      --
      What?
    10. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes
      East coast? Hurricanes
      South? Hurricanes
      Northeast? Blizzards


      Up here in NH, we just go inside during blizzards.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    11. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      Whoops. I was a bad fast boy on preview. Those would be WARM winds from that certain body VERY near texas. ahem

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    12. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Blizzard Survival 101

      1. Have food already bought
      2. Have wood already cut for heat
      3. Have a steep enough roof to naturally dump off snow.
      4. ...
      5. Profit!

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    13. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by The_K4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the sky is green, there's a problem

      What about is a cow or two go flying by?
      "Actualy I think that was the same cow." :)

    14. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tornadoes are scary as hell, but they are also one of nature's most interesting weather patterns. Getting caught in one is a nightmare, but people still chase them all the time! Why run from what you don't understand/fear? Learn about it, and enjoy the view! :)

    15. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Giant+Killer · · Score: 0

      you could always move to new mexico. ive driven through there a few times, and believe me, there is nothing.

    16. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by chrisgeleven · · Score: 1

      Blizzards are nothing. You just sit inside all day and wait for the roads to clear. They don't total houses (unless you get like 4 feet of snow on a roof and that never happens) or rip out trees. Most businesses and schools close anyways, so there is really no excuse to go on the roads. Anyone who gets killed thanks to a blizzard most likely was stupid enough to be on the roads.

      People make it sound like blizzards are the worst thing on the planet. I'll take my 1 blizzard per year in NH over any earthquake, tornado, or hurricane.

    17. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Up here in NH, we just go inside during blizzards.

      But a blizzard will kill just as readily (though perhaps not as quickly) as a tornado should you get caught out in one. In both cases, the safest bet is to keep an eye on the weather and find appropriate shelter until it passes.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    18. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
      And move to where?

      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes
      East coast? Hurricanes
      South? Hurricanes
      Northeast? Blizzards

      Could one include Texas in the South's list, or is this list only for natural disasters?

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    19. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      The Northeast is the safest place.

      Blizzards are laughable to those who were raised there.

      Our snow removal corps are well paid and trained, and most people own plows to help quicken the process. Everyone learns to drive on ice, and also that you shouldn't be on the roads in the first place.

      Where I was raised (Central Maine) dying from severe weather is practically unheard of.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    20. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      I'm not talking about relocating people. If idiots want to live in such a place and get sucked into tornados, then that'll get them out of the gene pool.

      Fertile soil is great for farmers, but that's about it. It doesn't take many people to farm the entire midwest, especially with modern farm equipment and automation.

      OK doesn't have anything to offer unless you're farmer, and neither does the rest of the midwest. Fossil records? There's a bunch of fossils in the Gobi desert too, and some paleontologists out there digging them up, but you don't see cities full of people moving there because of it.

    21. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if you're walking around in the fog, and fall in a hole and break your neck?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    22. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Then your car breaks down and you die of dehydration out in the dessert...

      Sounds like fun to me!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    23. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last year, we had a major ice storm in the Midwest. A huge number of people lost their electricity. Some of them died from the cold, others died from their space-heaters catching their house on fire. Blizzards are far from safe.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    24. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Because I have better things to do with my time than risk my life chasing tornados. If some tornado scientists want to do that, great, but I have a different profession and don't want to be bothered with bad weather. Why run from what you fear? Because it keeps you alive, that's why. I understand tornados perfectly; they're huge, powerful, dangerous storms that can't be controlled by humans. That means you should avoid them if you're intelligent.

      This whole topic reminds me of all the stupid people on the east coast who build expensive houses on the beach, which are destroyed by ocean storms every few years. Unfortunately in that case, the even stupider American public pays to rebuild these peoples' houses every time because of our subsidized government flood insurance. Any insurance companies insurance midwest houses against tornados either should be charging ridiculous premiums, or should get their management fired by the shareholders.

    25. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
      Heh. Not to knock NH, but those are snowstorms, not blizzards. Blizzards dump feet of snow, have high winds that create huge drifts and zero visibility, and bring deadly cold. They're vicious.

      Real blizzards can cause massive disruptions to the power and transportation grids for days on end. If you're living in the Midwest, the power goes out, and you can't even get your car out of the garage, you can be in serious trouble when the weather gets cold. (My wife's family lived in North Dakota when she was young, and there were times when they would -burn furniture- for heat because of power outages from winter storms. In a blizzard, no heat=no life.)

      Even normal snowstorms can be deadly. The first snowfall of the year invariably brings droves of automobile accidents, even if it's little more than a dusting. Interesting statistic: in 1997, winter storms killed more people than tornadoes did. (source)

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    26. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by fataugie · · Score: 1

      I got stuck in a snow storm on Rt 40 between Amarillo and Tucumcari in Feb 1986. They closed the road while I was on it.....never told me....it sucked! You're right.....not a God damn thing to do but keep driving forward slowly. And I was driving a tank ('76 Caprice).

      Just because it's desolate doesn't mean they don't get walloped at times.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    27. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by dackroyd · · Score: 1

      You mean drown, right ?

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    28. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, these storms occur in the middle of the midwest, where the culture sucks and there's nothing to do, so it's not like there's any good reason to stay.

      Actually, that's the difference in culture. We don't have to put up with assholes like you. What do I encounter when I go to the coast? Somebody who wants to kill me and take my money, or people who just don't know how to be polite.

      Culture in the Southwest? Huh?

    29. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by fataugie · · Score: 2, Funny

      The solutions is obvious....fill in the low area with the standing water using the mounds of earth to the west.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    30. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Quakes are far more rare (as far as actually damaging something) than tornados. Mudslides? Don't live on a river. Fire? Don't live out in the brush. Volcanoes? That's even more rare than quakes.

      Tornadoes seem to happen all the time though, every year. And yet people still choose to live in these dangerous areas. They keep getting tons of federal aid to rebuild their houses (maybe not the same specific people each time), every single year.

      I say, if you choose to live somewhere unsafe, don't expect the feds to come bail you out. Btw, I'm equally upset about folks living on the California coast whose houses sink into the water/slide, and then have them rebuilt again with other people's money. So I'm not just venting against repeat tornado victims. :)

    31. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      And as I always point out to the people in hurricane land who razz tornado dwellers:

      Tornadoes hit a subset of houses. Hurricanes hit EVERY house.

      (Of course, I moved from Oklahoma to Florida, which not only gets hurricanes but also has the most lightning deaths in the country, so WTF do I know?)

    32. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are rarely repeat victims dope. I've lived in OK my whole life. Never had tornado damage. Nor has anyone in my family, nor most of my Friends. When you are talking about the "areas" that seem to get hit every year, you are talking about much of texas, all of oklahoma, kansas, tenesee, missouri, arkansas, alabama, nebraska, and many other states. So, according to you, everyone in the central US should move to the west and east coast?

      Genius, why didn't we think of that. This country doesn't need to eat. Lets abandon our major food producing areas!!!!

      This guy should run for President.

    33. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the midwest is fucking retarded, so who cares?

    34. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Of course I am a boston dweller. Its dumb to live where hurricanes hit hard too. However by the time a hurricane gets up here it rarely does more than damage the coastal areas.

      Worst I have ever seen was a couple of trees uplifted and deposited on the sidewalk. No biggie. Hardly any damage.

      Hell... when hurricane bob came (which I hear was quite destructive in some places) I was sitting on my front porch watching the storm. Pretty tame stuff.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    35. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by King+Babar · · Score: 1
      The Northeast is the safest place.

      This would be my choice, too. But note that there is still some hurricane danger, and a surprisingly high amount of seismic activity.

      --

      Babar

    36. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by hax4bux · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a California transplanted Okie. It's not all earthquakes out here. Hell, Chico could be Oklahoma in many ways. Just ask my mule.

    37. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by JDevers · · Score: 1

      While tornados happen a lot more than quakes, you have to realize that just like quakes most tornados pass without hurting much of anything. It is only the rare, strong tornado that also happens to pass over an inhabited area that causes any real damage. Also, when a major tornado happens and it hits an urban area, a handful of people usually die. On the other hand, when a major quake strikes an urban area hundreds or even thousands die and thats not counting the fires that they normally start.

      I've lived in the midwest and I've even seen a tornado, I've seen trees blown over from real small ones and once saw a few houses damaged, but that was about it. On the other hand, while visiting family in LA I've felt several earthquakes...

    38. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by revmoo · · Score: 1

      Then your car breaks down and you die of dehydration out in the dessert...

      err, desert you mean?

      I have yet to hear of anyone dying from dessert.....except for a few rare cases of fruitcake-induced coma...

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    39. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tibet?

      Tibet titty twisters?

      -bimbo magnet-

    40. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by realdpk · · Score: 1

      So you think you deserve federal aid if your house does get flattened, knowing you live in an area with that risk? That's my problem with it. If you take a risk, cover yourself (insurance or otherwise). Don't expect the rest of us to care..

    41. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Wog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I second the green-sky tip. I'm a student at Union University in Jackson, TN, and have lived through two major tornados in as many semesters... When the sky turns green and the rain goes vertical, get the heck inside and hope you can close your exterior door.

    42. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by mattsucks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actualy I think that was the same cow.

      Deja-moo.

    43. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by JDevers · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you live, but you might want to take a look at this site before you condemn the midwest.

      http://www.disastercenter.com/tornado/rank.htm

      The second ranked state is Massachusetts.

      Oh, and my county is one of the fastest growing in the country as well, and its not just retired people, and I live smack dab in the middle of the midwest.

    44. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Weather radio with instant on functionality. Once or twice a year you get woken out of a deep sleep for no reason, but it just might save your life.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    45. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Btw, I'm equally upset about folks living on the California coast whose houses sink into the water/slide, and then have them rebuilt again with other people's money

      Most of those homes were built before knowledge of just unstable the soil is. And when 'rebuilt' its typically not another cliffside home.

      Why irritates me more are the homes built in Flordia and the Keys on the waterfront that get demolished every other year by hurricanes and get rebuilt at the exact same spot at the federal taxpayer's expense. Very few home actually fall of the California coast each year...especially compared to what happens in Florida.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    46. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Ok, no-one ever died from lack of power, uless they didn't plan in advance. and if you are burning your furniture, that means you dodn't plan in advance... Advance planning means backup heat(wood doesn't need a backup, neither does an underground gas line) and sufficient food. And don't suggest that you might run out of food because your fridge loses power... well its really freaking cold outside... throw the perishables in a cooler. Oh, and keep a faucet or two running... or you will freeze your pipes.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    47. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. Too bad they have water shortages in the southwest. Now us living in the midwest where there's water don't look too dumb, do we?

    48. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      And move to where?

      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes
      East coast? Hurricanes
      South? Hurricanes
      Northeast? Blizzards


      west-michigan... if you live near the dunes you CANNOT get a tornado. when they enter the shoreline from the lake they hit the 100+foot sand dunes and jump high. causing not to land for another 15-20 miles.

      I've watched 60-70 tornadoes here... but have NEVER had one destroy anything but fish (yes, raining fish.. I have watched it happen 5 times) in my town...

      Now. if the tornado get's lucky and shoots in a river inlet so it avoids all the jumps... well then it get's ugly... as the trailer parks are all in a row here.....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    49. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you beat me to it.

      You can pick up a nice weather radio at radio shack or other fine electronics stores for $50 or less. You can even get SAME (Specific Area Message Encoding) enabled radios now which will only go off for the countie(s) and for the warning(s) you tell it to.

    50. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by girth · · Score: 1
      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes

      Missouri has had two quakes larger than any in CA. The first CA quake on the list is number 10. I feared earthquakes more in Boston. All that brick just waiting to fall.


      Volcanoes and mudslides are avoidable. Don't live next to smoking mountains or under/above large hills.


      Fire. Well everything burns.

    51. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. So tell that to all the farmers. Without them, you have no food. What do you think goes on in the tornado prone areas? You guessed it.. farming.

      People are so retarded sometimes.

    52. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by PHoliday · · Score: 1

      Yeah... gotta hate it when that damn rains goes *vertical*

      It's almost like it's coming straight down on you.

    53. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Gleef · · Score: 1

      dackroyd wrote:

      England has weather that's quite unlikely to kill you.


      Tell that to the hundreds of people who died from the "London Fog" of 1991, or the thousands from the one in 1952.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    54. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And move to where?

      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes
      East coast? Hurricanes
      South? Hurricanes
      Northeast? Blizzards "

      Funny that you say that, because here on the west coast, in central valley (around Sacramento) there was a tornado warning yesterday (5/8/03) that was blinking all over the TV channels for an hour or two. We had some nasty clouds coming in and although I dont know if it touched down on the ground, there was atleast one funnel cloud trying to stir up some shit in the skies.

      For the most part, no matter what you do you wont be able to get away from bad weather. If you don't like it, then move to Hawaii or some other tropical destination. Of course they might have the occasional tropical storm, but you really aren't going to get away from weather problems unless you dig a 50ft hole and build a cement bunker.

    55. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the area of potential tornados is a VAST area. Are you seriously suggesting that nobody should build anywhere in all of Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, etc?

      Other than that, I agree with your sentiment. I felt the same way when the mississippi river flooded and wiped out all those farmers - tough luck. You built right next to a huge river that is known to flood every 50 years or so. You knew it was a flood plain because you liked the rich farming soil it provided - people told you the Misissippi river has one nasty flood like that once every 50 years or so. So tough. Live with it. Taking into account the fact that you might get flooded out one year should have been part of your risk assessment when deciding if the rich soil of a floodplain was worth it.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    56. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      Live in the mountains. The worst you have is flooding.

      OK it's pretty bad too. But it takes longer to die.

      OK, that's not a plus. Never mind.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    57. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...and the rain goes vertical


      Uhh. Doesn't it normally go that way? Y'know, kinda from the sky to the ground?

      Oh, my god! It's raining...vertically!!! RUN FOR SHELTER!

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    58. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Most people don't have wood burners! And considering how many people set their houses on fire with space-heaters, wood-burners aren't that good an idea anyway. And most furnices need gas AND electricity. No electric, no heat!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    59. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      But those were probably the only 2 quakes in Missouri's known history. When we DO get a quake, it's a lulu, but we might go centuries between quakes. Unlike CA, which shakes at the drop of a hat. Any hat!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    60. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by rikkards · · Score: 2, Funny

      6. If you see small people its too late for the plan

    61. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Spanky+Lovesalot · · Score: 1

      > No, the best way to survive a tornado is not
      > to live in a trailer park ... hurricane magnet.

      To be completely fair, during Hurricane Hugo in 1989, there were no double-wide trailers lost in South Carolina. So, while single wide trailers are the bane of hurricane and tornado areas, a properly secured double-wide is pretty much just as safe as a standard home.

    62. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't get walloped at times.
      That's like what 1 maybe 2 inches of snow? :)(joke)

    63. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by ek_adam · · Score: 1

      East Coast?

      The deadliest single tornado ever was in Worcester, Massachusetts back in 1953.

    64. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. And when that massive riot breaks out we shouldn't come to your aid. You should own a gun and not expect help from the Feds. After all, you chose to live in an area with overcrowding!

    65. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Indiana and Ohio aren't bad. At worst we see "tornados" (tiny little F1's that maybe touch down for a quarter mile stretch once every other year) and if you live within 10 miles of the Great Lakes, lots of lake effect snow/blizzards (which we tend to just go inside and call off work for anyway). Many businesses in North Eastern Ohio simply close up completely when there is more than 6-8" of snow on the ground (it didnt even all have to fall at once)

    66. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by M-G · · Score: 1

      If you take a risk, cover yourself (insurance or otherwise). Don't expect the rest of us to care..

      Uh, people who live in these areas _do_ typically have insurance to cover themselves. Your typical homeowners insurance policy covers tornadoes. Depending on where you live, it won't cover flood or earthquake damage: you have to get extra coverage for those.

    67. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by axxackall · · Score: 1
      But the area of potential tornados is a VAST area. Are you seriously suggesting that nobody should build anywhere in all of Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, etc?

      Move to Canada. There are still enough of not-overcrowded-yet places.

      Besides, I think that flooding once every 50 years is less disater as arrogant goverment after every other election.

      --

      Less is more !
    68. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      And move to where?

      Canada :)

    69. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by rfovell · · Score: 1
      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes


      And, ironically enough, you can add tornadoes. California has a much higher incidence of tornadoes than even its own residents appreciate. They tend to be weak, but incidents per square mile are comparable to places on the fringes of Tornado Alley. [rah-rah]We got it all![/rah-rah]

      Source: An issue of "Weather and Forecasting" appearing in 1994 had back-to-back articles on California tornadoes, by Blier and Batten and Monteverdi and Quadros.

      --
      Every rule has an exception (except this one).
    70. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Perfectly fair. However, a riot hitting my area would be pretty unlikely, unless people are protesting hospitals (I live near 'em).

      I think if a riot was going on, and I was walking around in the area, then yes, I should not expect the feds to help me. That'd be rediculous. I don't go where it isn't safe.

    71. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close the door, but leave some windows open so a sharp pressure drop can't burst the building.

    72. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops -- that tip is actually not useful. When I was in elementary school a teacher told us about leaving windows open, and I believed it faithfully but havent thought much about it since.

      But now I am more or less capable of thinking independently, so after I made that post my bullshit detector started to go off. Basically, houses are not very airtight, and the pressure change is not that dramatic except perhaps at the vortex itself.

      And sure enough, a google search reveals a number of fairly credible sources agreeing that this is a myth.

    73. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      Actually, hurricanes are a lot easier to survive if you aren't right on the coast.

      Just live about 10 miles in. And if you are worried about blizzards, NY rarely gets them.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    74. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Sydney is less depressing and relatively safe...

      apart from the tennis ball sized hailstones, the tree felling thunderstorms, the bushfires and the flooding...

      I'll stop now

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    75. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      Sorry to break it to you, but we only had one Andrew in 1992, and it was an exception to the rule. Old Florida houses seemed to survive intact (single story, concrete tile roofs, cement block construction) while the newer developments turned to match sticks (more or less wood houses on cement pads).

      The older houses have survived many hurricanes, and that is the only threat we face other than a few tornados.

      Andrew was a catagory 4-5 hurricane with official measured windspeeds of 145-175 mph, they speculated the wind was actually faster as the windspeed device was ripped from turkey point nuclear power plant, but keep in mind this is a once in a lifetime type deal (knock knock), the once in a lifetime deal for Cali will likely kill tens of thousands and cost billions more, we lost 15 people, 25 billion in damage.

      NOAA

    76. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The only good thing about where tornados tend to occur is that population is relatively sparse

      Duh.
      Population is sparse everywhere, it is only a few tiny places where it is dense. From your favorite city, pick a random direction and drive for 30 miles. If you're not out of the city, you're driving between D.C. and Boston. Turn left or right and go another 30 miles.

      How dense is the population there? That's what most of the world is like. (Oh, you're going to quibble about your random direction taking you into the ocean? That is sparcely populated too.)

    77. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaving window open is 1930 science. Pressure does not drop enough to affect [almost] anything -- if it did, there would be plenty of cameras after a tornado showing all the cars which tried to expand. There is a small pressure drop in the center, but any house in the center has already had a bunch of holes put in it as the wall of the tornado went across it, and houses leak anyway. (And if you've tried pushing against a wall you know that a pane of glass would break if there were any pressure problem) There actually have been some studies that confirmed this.

    78. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      I don't think they get it. Maybe we have to mention a yellow brick road.

    79. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, your weather in New Mexico might be about to change. You've heard of the abandoned Mesa Verde? It was part of several settlements which were abandoned during some droughts in the 13th century. Well, from the 11th century until the 19th century the planet had colder weather than usual, and colder weather means less humidity. We're now returning to the temperatures which the world used to have, which should make those rains somewhat more frequent.

    80. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they died because of their failure to adapt to a natural situation. Some didn't dress warmly enough. Others put flammable material too close to the heaters, thus causing the fires

      The same thing with tornados. I can't for my life understand why so many idiots build flimsy wooden structures in an area they know is plagued by tornados, then complain about "how terrible nature is"..... Same thing with the idiots along the mississipi, building close to the river, and then complaining about it flooding, despite it having done that every year for a _looong_ time(even on the geological scale)

    81. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, a riot hitting my area would be pretty unlikely,

      Really? So what do you think would happen if the food trucks stopped arriving because all those "idiots" in the Midwest and California who grow your food all moved to someplace "safe"?

      Your town is, at most, one week away from food riots. If you live in a major city, it's more like 2 or 3 days.

    82. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      I've seen plenty of green sky, but what do you mean by "the rain goes vertical"?

      Is it the heavy wet dreadful silence right before hell breaks loose? I do seem to remember that. (I spent many summers in Nebraska)

      Just curious.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    83. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by thynk · · Score: 1

      yes, raining fish..

      For some reason, I think I'd rather live through the forest fires and occasional flash flood we have here in Colorado.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    84. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by ndinsil · · Score: 1

      but you really aren't going to get away from weather problems unless you dig a 50ft hole and build a cement bunker.


      But then the graboids will get you!
    85. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adelaide is great, weather wise. Pity there's no other reason a sane person would live here.

    86. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurricane Danger...

      Okay, so I was raised and lived for 38 years in the Northeast, I have been through several hurricanes, my experience is that if you don't live at an altitude of less than 10 feet and within a certain (small!like 100 feet) distance from the shore then for you it is a big wind. During hurricane Bob in 1991 we dug trenches to carry off the torrential rains, taped windows, bought lamp oil and waited. For my mother and I (I stayed at her place to ensure her safety as she wouldn't leave) it was a big wind then 7 days without electricity.

      The only people who died were Morons out windsurfing (yes, Really!) and the brave souls in the coast guard who tried to rescue them

  3. What are you doing? by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Funny

    We here in central Oklahoma, USA are just climbing out of the wreckage of another series of tornadoes.

    Ok, you just climbed out of tornado wreckage (which is nothing to laugh about, I've been through a couple when I lived in Indiana), but the first thing that comes to your mind is dude, I bet we can submit this to /. and they'll post it!

    Seriously, though, its cool that technology can help when mother nature is being a muthah...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:What are you doing? by robslimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's right, pick on us Okies when we spin a little figure of speech.

      What I take exception to is this phrase:
      Unlike the tornadoes of May 3rd, 1999, which killed 47 and injured more than 800, we now have much better tornado information and prediction technology.

      Perhaps the fact that '99s tornado was an F5 and this one was a F2 to low F3 has a little to do with the difference in damage/causualties?

    2. Re:What are you doing? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps the fact that '99s tornado was an F5 and this one was a F2 to low F3 has a little to do with the difference in damage/causualties?

      I though that the F ratings were a measure of the damage caused. If so, then what you said is a tautology.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:What are you doing? by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Perhaps the fact that '99s tornado was an F5 and this one was a F2 to low F3 has a little to do with the difference in damage/causualties?

      Actually since the rating of a tornado is directly based on the amount of damage it does... yes it does have a 'little' to do with the difference in damage but nothing to do with the number of casualties.

      This does not change the fact that the "size" of the tornado has little to do with the rating on the Fujita Scale. A tornado that is capable of being a F4 or F5 may only be rated as an F2 if it simply passes through open fields causing minimal damage. So the argument of '99s tornado was and F5 an these were F2 to F3 accounts for the difference in causualties does not hold water unless you take into account the path of the tornados. An F2 sweeping through an open air concert jammed with people could cause many more deaths then an F5 sweeping through an urban setting where few people are killed due to adequate shelter and warning.

      Better technology will always help in reducing the number of deaths and injuries due to tornados. In the long run it may even assist in redefining the Fujita scale as engineered structures become more tornado tolerant thereby reducing the amount of damage produced by tornados.

      Overall I am glad I have only seen one tornado in my life for real. I will be quite happy if the most intense tornado I see close up is the one in the movie Twister watching from the 3 row :-)

      [offtopic]For those of you 'in the know' how realistic was the movie Twister anyway? It impressed the hell out of me and I throughouly enjoyed it; wouldn't even mind a sequal (hmm, title suggestion "Twisted" :-) ).[/offtopic]

      Merlin.
      P.S. So how do you include 'fake' tags with less-then, greater-then signs in /. messages anyway?

    4. Re:What are you doing? by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Informative

      I though that the F ratings were a measure of the damage caused...

      Nope. An F5 could pass through open prairie and cause very little damage. An F3 can plow through a densly populated area and do lots of damage.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    5. Re:What are you doing? by robslimo · · Score: 1

      From your link:

      The entire premise of estimating wind speeds from damage to non-engineered structures is very subjective and is difficult to defend from various meteorological perspectives.

      The ratings in the F scale are for wind speeds, ergo the damage that could be done. Unfortunately, we don't have accurate methods to measure the actual wind speed, so the best we do is estimate if from the damage done to non-engineered structures, meaning that a tornado that passed through a relatively uninhabited area should be rankable by damage to trees, etc. It is still the *intent* of the Fujita scale to rank tornados in terms of wind speed.

      -robSlimo

    6. Re:What are you doing? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Since the F scale is measured only by damage done, how could you tell that an F5 had struck open prarie? The definition of F5 is based on the way in which buildings are damaged. If none were there to damage, how would you know whether it reached F5 or not?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    7. Re:What are you doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twister was a pile of junk. Its the last movie I ever saw in the theaters. They outrun an F5 tornado on foot, then hook themselves up in some shed.. Sorry, but if you were in that situation, you'd be instantly killed by the debris.. And you can't usually outrun those things in cars.. let alone on foot.
      Theres also one point before they're next to the tornadoes over that lake... where they turn onto a 1 lane dirt road, then when the camera switches angles, they're on a 2 lane paved road. Doh.

      On top of that, when they go find their grandmas house half levelled, theres fires... Uhh.. can you say EARTHQUAKE SCENE? I've never seen a tornado do that... just earthquakes.

      All in all, I think it made the general public feel as if they could just go chase storms for the hell of it. I'm surprised more people have died doing this. Its just like that wichita kansas TV Crew in 1991 that was being chased down the road by a tornado so they stop under an overpass as the tornado goes overhead.... A lot of people died this way in the F5 tornadoes which went through OK City in 1999... Sure they were fine in the 100mph or less winds in Wichita, but when you get 300 mph winds, the debris and wind go through the overpasses a lot more concentrated.. In fact, its probably about the worst place you could be in an F5.

    8. Re:What are you doing? by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 1
      non-engineered structures

      Just a note: Although references are made to damage to non-engineered structures you will note later on in the page and here that engineered structures are definitely considered when doing damage estimation. I don't believe non-engineered vs engineered structures was you main point but I figured I would mention it.

      I understand that the Fujita scales intent is to estimate wind speed and thanks for pointing that out. My intent of siting and example of a relatively uninhabited areas was to point out that tornados can and have been 'mis-rated' because of anomolies (such as lack of damage in an open area; devoid of trees, etc.; example: large area of cultivated plains). In fact this type of case is mentioned later on in the first link I provided.

      Your point does make me question my statement of the F scale being redefined though. That was off the top of my head thinking and in reality the F scale will probably eventually either be obsoleted due to better wind spead measuring technology or at least be re-defined in terms not mapping damage to wind speed.

      Merlin.

    9. Re:What are you doing? by qed123 · · Score: 1

      You could ask the hawks and the prarie dogs.
      F is a measure of the size and wind speeds.
      For example the tornodo that ripped through
      OK city or Dallas (I can't remember) was so
      big they practically had to invent a new F level,
      like 400 mph winds I think. Also if it
      touched down way out on the prarie tornadoes
      have a tendency to leave a path of destruction,
      from the obvious (grass stripped) to the
      subtle (like everything smashed up but it leaves
      1 tree standing perfect, or picks up a car
      and sets it back down upside down). However
      sometimes they don't touch the ground for
      a while or hop so it may leave the ground
      looking the same.

    10. Re:What are you doing? by M-G · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the fact that '99s tornado was an F5 and this one was a F2 to low F3 has a little to do with the difference in damage/causualties?

      Also, it wasn't like people didn't know the '99 storm was coming. It was being watched for quite a while as it approached Moore.

    11. Re:What are you doing? by M-G · · Score: 1

      Twister was a pile of junk.

      Well, it _was_ a Hollywood flick. Can't expect things to be too accurate. On the plus side, it did feature a real meteorologist, by the name of Jeff Lazalier. I'm pretty sure he's the one interviewing the chasers in the film (haven't seen it in years). Anyway, while I lived in the Tulsa area, I considered him to be one of the best TV meteorologists out there.

      As for the Wichita TV crew, sure, you might not survive an F5 ducking into an overpass like they did, but you're also not likely to survive a direct hit by one in a ditch, either.

    12. Re:What are you doing? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      F is a measure of the size and wind speeds.

      That's the GOAL, but in practice the only way they have to do it is to assess damage to objects with well-known properties. So while the goal of the F
      scale is to get a range of guess for the windspeed the system USES property damage to make that guess. (It's like measuring mass in Kilograms by using a weight scale. Kilograms are NOT a measure of weight, but on earth there's a known one-to-one mapping between the two, so weight is typically used to arrive at a figure for mass. The F-scale does the same sort of thing, but in a more vague fasion.

      If your only means of measuring mass was a scale, you wouldn't know what the mass of something in zero-G is. And if the only means of measuring windspeed is to look at damage to well-known manmade objects, and there aren't any around, you don't know what the windspeed was.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    13. Re:What are you doing? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      You can judge scale by the swath it cuts through open land. Sure it's easier to assess if the tornado is able to damage something with given properties, but lack of data does not alter the size or intensity of the funnel.

      If your only means of measuring mass was a scale, you wouldn't know what the mass of something in zero-G is.

      But that wouldn't be the same as the object not having mass.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    14. Re:What are you doing? by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      P.S. So how do you include 'fake' tags with less-then, greater-then signs in /. messages anyway?

      > and <

      < >

    15. Re:What are you doing? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      But that wouldn't be the same as the object not
      having mass.

      Go re-read my post that caused you to argue with me in the first place. I never said there would be no wind - just that it can't be measured on the F-scale without stuff being damaged, and that's why we don't know the intensity of tornadoes that are too rural.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    16. Re:What are you doing? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Ah. Subtle difference. I was still keying off the original post I'd replied to where the poster said, "I though that the F ratings were a measure of the damage caused...". The F scale is calculated by the damage caused, but is a measurement of size and intensity. You're correct in that it would be much more difficult to gauge the intensity in very rural areas. There would be exceptions where the swath cut through prairie grasses or crops is extremely wide (1/2mi?) and doesn't indicate a snaking path. Those likely would be a 'bigun'.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  4. Sadly... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    Despite all our advances in tornado detection, storm shelter technology, and early warning systems, the fact remains that tornadoes still really suck.

    *ducks*

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Sadly... by zulux · · Score: 1

      the fact remains that tornadoes still really suck.

      Actually, Microsoft Tornado 2003 - with ActiMate Barney Technology is the first Microsoft product that doesen't suck.

      It blows.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Sadly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you be here all night?

  5. Tornados, bombs, Land slides, earthquacks by mgrennan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just ejoy where you live. If you feer about these things move. I live in OKC. I've helped dig people out. But I still wouldn't move.

    --
    There are 10 type of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Tornados, bombs, Land slides, earthquacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I still wouldn't move.

      how do you secure your trailer to the ground? with adamantium?

  6. Crazy Winds~ by L0stb0Y · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to see a cow fly by like in Twister...

    Ok, seriously, I know that they always tell you to get in a doorway, or bathtub, supposedly because it is a 'more sound structure'~ I would think you wouldn't want to be near porcelain at a time like that...

    And not living in an area like that, how often do people build their own 'shelter' as opposed to a central/public one?

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
    1. Re:Crazy Winds~ by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We had Tornado shelters in South Dakota.

      Storm cellers, basements, crawl spaces. It's all good.

      Bathtubs are good not because of the material, but because it's one piece, they usually survive and it's a place you can get down and cover your vital organs and noggin while having some side protection.

      Tubs usually were cast iron with a porcelain coating over them, now they are usually fiberglass.

    2. Re:Crazy Winds~ by itchyfidget · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would think you wouldn't want to be near porcelain at a time like that...

      I'd be wishing I was near porcelain, since the alternatives involve begging rescue-workers for a clean pair of pants...

      --
      Mod early, mod often.
    3. Re:Crazy Winds~ by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Given that people may not have a lot of warning, it would be advisable to have your own shelter. The time it takes to go outside and travel to a central shelter may not be available. Doing so may get you hurt.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    4. Re:Crazy Winds~ by jridley · · Score: 1

      I would think you wouldn't want to be near porcelain at a time like that

      What porcelain? The toilet? Bathtubs have historically been made of iron, with a porcelain or enamel cover. Nowadays most are made from fiberglass.

      Bathtubs, particularly old standalones, are seriously heavy, and due to the shape of the clawfoot variety, resist the wind picking them up.

      Every paranoid should have a clawfoot tub in their house. besides tornado protection, they make a pretty good bullet shield if the black helicopter guys start to riddle your house with automatic weapons fire :-)

    5. Re:Crazy Winds~ by robslimo · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but the home builders in Oklahoma just don't put in a storm shelter unless you specifically ask for it (and pay extra, of course). I heard one builder say that the red clay soil of OK doesn't place nice with basements, but I think that's a cop-out.

      In Kansas, it seems like most homes have a basement; that's just how they build them.

    6. Re:Crazy Winds~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No bathtubs and doorways are for earthquakes. Here in tornado country (Indiana) we know to get down low and under heavy stuff! Basement storm rooms are common ... Mines been rigged real good (9" ac/dc TV, scanner, ham radio, CB, and a gun to keep my debis mine!) Also Purdue says to make it tornado proof the walls are 2 3/4" plywood sheets with a 10 gauge sheet metal sandwiched between, done on both sides of 2 X 4 studs. Besides a tornado is localized in its damage I have seen the effects of 2 good storms. The most recent created 13 seperate tornados in a 4 county area but only ruined 12 houses beyond repair, and it picked and choosed ... level the garage leave the house, or scrape the farm ground bare and leave the trailer court alone (yeah it was a REAL WIERD tornado...) (pic's are at the imoskywarn web site (search for it yourself my linking in here sucks.)

    7. Re:Crazy Winds~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's what I was thinking... way back when the advice was first written tubs were cast iron. Now they're relatively flimsy fiberglass.

      I don't think I've ever seen a porcelain bathtub, at least not one that was entirely porcelain. I've seen quite a few enamel coated sheetmetal ones though. Built just like the really cheap enameled pots and pans and cold like a witches t...uh, like montana in winter when you first sat down in it :)

    8. Re:Crazy Winds~ by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Ok, seriously, I know that they always tell you to get in a doorway, or bathtub...

      Doorways are for earthquakes. Bathtubs are no longer safe (as others have pointed out) because they're now usually fiberglass. Basements are best and preferably basement areas away from masonry fireplaces as they can collapse downward into the basement once supporting structure is torn away. Climbing up under an overpass or bridge isn't really all that safe either as a direct hit from a tornado will suck you right out. In a near miss the bridge structure could shield you from some debris, but not all.

      I would think you wouldn't want to be near porcelain at a time like that...

      What? When you're about to pee your pants?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  7. I like bad weather by paRcat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's wierd... I grew up in Tulsa, and I moved to NYC when I was 19. I'm now back in the Tulsa area. Why? I missed the storms. Granted, I've made sure that the areas I live in have been geographically pre-disposed to not having tornadoes, and I don't like the idea of people being hurt... but being in a shelter as an enormous supercell passes overhead is a bit of a rush.

    go fig.

    1. Re:I like bad weather by Quikah · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. I grew up in suburban chicago, while storms aren't that bad there, there is nothing like a good thunderstorm. I miss that living in LA, where I don't think I have ever even heard thunder. :( I miss the snow too. Man I gotta get out of LA.

      --
      Q.
    2. Re:I like bad weather by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      This is why the first Matrix failed.

      Think about it.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    3. Re:I like bad weather by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I'm from Ontario, and there was a big tornado that literally ripped right past me as a kid. We were at my folks "retirement property", which is 99 acres outside of Owen Sound, and at the time there was just a little cabin there.

      It took out the trailer park down the road (that's always the way), and came straight across our fields behind the cabin, not more than a half a kilometer from the cabin itself. We would have been seriously boned if it hit us dead on.

      I remember the sound, it sounded like an army of combines or tractors coming across the field. You couldnt see too much of anything, there was so much dust and stuff flying around. Just a deafening roar and pitch black darkness. The next day we saw the path it tore through the trees, and realized how close it came.

      It's awesome to see what it leaves behind. It looked as though crews had been through to clear the land for a highway or something, except the tornado did in an hour what would have taken a months with heavy equipment.

      Damn, it was cool. Not something I'd want to see every day, though.

      Now I'm on the east coast of the states, all we have are crappy old hurricanes and floods. (Well, and a good old blizzard this year to make me homesick)

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:I like bad weather by gordie · · Score: 1

      If you are from the Chicago area and think storms aren't that bad there, just remember what happened to Plainfield IL (Southwest of Chicago) in 1990. I watched from an underpass as the town was destroyed before my eyes. The Chicago area has fewer major storms then Kansas but don't think it's any safer! The thing I remember most was hearing the warning sirens going off after it was over. link to article on memorial to the event

    5. Re:I like bad weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you live in the Tulsa area and "made sure that the areas I live in have been geographically pre-disposed to not having tornadoes"?

      I know you don't have any mountains near you, so how is it that you are protected?

  8. Registration is just the first step by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh sure, it seems harmless now -- "Just register your shelter with the government, and we'll help you out later!"
    But the next thing you know, Big Brother has these lists of shelters! It only makes it easier when they need to confiscate them later!!
    I tell you what, you can have my unregistered shelter when you pry it from my cold, dead hands!

    --

    1. Re:Registration is just the first step by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you know, once the government confiscates those legally registered shelters, only the criminals will have them...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Registration is just the first step by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      "We will not allow these tornados of terror to frighten our communities and threaten America. Our response must be decisive, this grave evil does not deserve to be protected, as American citizens were, by our constitution."

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    3. Re:Registration is just the first step by CrasHUV · · Score: 1

      " It only makes it easier when they need to confiscate them later!!"

      Umm... 90% of them are in-gound garage shelters (you park your car over it until you need it). You would need a Jedi Knight to lift it out of the ground, and one preferably with a little more training than those those oppressed Aussies ( Australia Oppresses Jedi).

      --
      Its all just smoke and mirrors.
    4. Re:Registration is just the first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also seems you could do with a Jedi's sense of humor.

    5. Re:Registration is just the first step by M-G · · Score: 1

      90% of them are in-gound garage shelters

      They are? After the '99 Moore storm, the safety officials were promoting the building of an above-ground reinforced shelter. I know some people had below-ground shelters, but it seems the vast majority had nothing at all.

  9. we need to develope construction techniques by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0, Redundant

    and technologies so that people who live in tornado alley do not lose their home or their life.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Few people lose their lives nowadays though. Almost every single piece of bad weather it predicted well in advance by NOAA and the NWS and alerts are issued. I live in Pittsburg, KS (the far SE corner of KS). 6 miles north of me 3 people died in Franklin, KS in last Sunday's tornados. Those 3 people ignored the warnings on radio, TV, and via local fire whistles to take shelter. The gambled and they lost. For some reason people simply do not pay attention to the weather. They don't listen to the radios during periods common for tornados. They don't own a weather radio. They simply play dumb and hope they're safe. The evidence shows that they are not.

      This tornado is the 5th that I've helped clean up after. I grew up 2.5 hours west of here, south of Wichita. I cleaned up from 4 different tornado incidents back home, including my grandfathers farm/ranch. Back home those families that weren't hit help those that were. That very night or early the following morning the community decends on the destruction in mass to help clean up. I was surprised by what happened in Franklin. I went up there expecting to help people dig out like I'd done before. I couldn't get into the town. The police were guarding all the entrances to the town and only permitting entrance to those people with photo ID that proved they lived in the affected area. As it turns out, within 30 minutes of the tornado city folks swamped the city streets looking for damage. They were rubbernecking. They couldn't stay home and watch it on TV. They had to get in their cars and drive through the affected areas looking for death and destruction. This prevented emergency vehicles from being able to gain access to those areas. Hence, the city was shut down. Damned city folk. In the end I donated some clothing and rode an Red Cross IRV and served food all day. I would have felt more useful doing something else but someone had to feed the people and workers.

      Back on topic. There is no such thing as a tornado proof building. NOAA has done hundreds of studies into building material. They have yet to find anything that can withstand the winds of even a strong F3 tornado. A F3 tornado damaged reinforced concrete. A F4 ripped reinforced concrete apart. A F5 crumbles it into little bits. What needs to be focused on is tornado shelters and getting people into them. Homes and possessions can be replaced. People can not.

    2. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by headonfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hey, welcome to the party. i'm here in lawrence, kansas and we got hit thursday. no deaths and only minor injuries, thank goodness.

      we had the rubberneck syndrome last night really badly. i'm an emergency service volunteer, and traffic just started -pouring- into the area. people were on foot just walking around, taking pictures, blocking traffic, you name it. if nothing else, i'd beg people to please, for the love of god, stay clear of the disaster area if you don't live there. :/

      http://www.ljworld.com/section/severeweather/sto ry /131328

    3. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure I buy this statement that we cannot build tornado resistant buildings.

      It seems to me that airplanes can resist the same wind levels. Earth sheltered buildings also come to mind.
      Whether the increase in durability is worth the cost is the real question for me.

      Second, when many more fatalities occur in trailer homes that are flimsily built - no I do not believe they attract tornados - they attract post-tornado reporters, it clearly means that contruction methods could be much better, and that better is more likely to resist damage than worse.

    4. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People cannot be replaced yet.....

    5. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Very true. The stronger the structure the more likely it will survive. My point however was that we can't make a home that will survive a tornado in a feasible manner. Subterranian homes do very well but are far from cost-effective to build and few desire one. If a tornado can destroy reinforced concrete, it can do a helluva lot more to a stick built home.

      Couple this with the fact that tornados simply aren't predictable. It's truly amazing the damage a tornado can do to a neighborhood while leaving a single building in the dead center of the path completely untouched. Amazing. When the March 26, 91 tornados hit my Grandfather's airplane by his house, it didn't toss it into the pond like it did with many other things on that runway. Instead it simply stood his prop-job on its nose, literally. His kitchen in which he was standing had glass inpaled in the walls, ceiling, cabinents, dishwasher, fridge, etc but nothing in him who was standing next to the dishwasher. The good glassware on top of the fridge was still dusty too. Amazing. I saw a home in Missouri Monday that was hit. It was a brick home. The tornado removed every single item from the home including the interior walls and roof. All it left was the brick exterior walls. If a small tornado can do things like that, imagine what a big one can do...

      Also take into account debris. Much of the damage and nearly all of the death is caused by flying debris, now projectiles. If a F3 tornado picks up a 4-ton Ford Excusion and slams it into a wall, the wall is going to crumble. We can't forget that fact. :-(

    6. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      I hear you. Last night the tornados in Labette county were set to pass south of Pittsburg by about 10 miles. They weakened at the last minute and turned into Pittsburg. The cells headed your way were pretty damned big though. Glad to hear all were ok.

      There should be some law against rubbernecking. Besides the damage it can cause in disasters such as these, rubbernecking is probably the 2nd most prominent cause of motor-vehicle accidents. You know that Police Pursuit shows on FX (I call them Fuck Up Shit Caught on Tape)? Look at at prevelant it is for a rubbernecker to hit an officer that has someone pulled over on the side of the road. There should be some sort of severe penalties for crap like that.

      You know, I have to wonder if any of the 3 lives in Franklin could have been saved if the emergency response folks could have gotten to those people sooner. I haven't heard how those 3 died. I know one by Liberal was hit by debris and died at the hospital. Nevertheless it makes you wonder how many lives the rubberneckers put at risk by their careless and thoughtless gawking.

      Why don't they wait for the media to cover the damage? Then they could sit on their asses at home and watch it on TV. At the very least they could wait a week or two. There will still be plenty of damage to gawk at then. I swear these damn city folks... grrrr... >8-{ I felt pretty worthless in the Red Cross chow waggon but at least I was doing something which is more than the gawkers did. *sigh*

    7. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      what about slightly subsurface houseing?

      technology might not beable to save homes but techniques can...especialy with new materials that resist subteranian conditions.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by headonfire · · Score: 1

      don't feel worthless in the food wagon. that's an awesome thing - the salvation army's wagon fed me and my fellows, along with the law enforcement, fire, and medical teams. i was seriously running low on energy when i got a sports drink and a bit of candy to keep me going. the funny thing was, by that time i was teamed up with the red cross. ;) but the SA got in there with the food and whatnot while the RC damage assessment teams went at it.

      emergency personnel was out and on the scene almost instantly. response time was fantastic. though the police were getting really, really frustrated with people both in cars and on foot. i was waiting at an intersection to get waived through and some asshole got out of his car and demanded i make a turn. made him wait for another ten minutes, then cheerfully waved as the cop let me through the roadblock. :)

      volunteer service rocks, no matter what you're doing. just being on-site with a volunteer service, even if you're not doing too much, is a great thing.

    9. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      It's always a possibility. Someday I'm sure they'll find a good way to minimize the damage from the wind itself. I don't know that they'll ever find a feasible way to defend a home from a tornado. It seems to be one of those overwhelming tasks. Minimizing the exposed flat surface areas certainly helps. There is a tower going up in Hong Kong IIRC that will be the world's tallest building once it's completed. They dealt with the wind currents by minimizing the flat surface areas of the building. I would have to say that if a building was made entirely out of reinforced concrete, from the floors to walls and even the roof with no windows and only a slid steel door then I suspect it would be able to withstand a direct hit from a F-4. That's assuming of course that the tornado doesn't send a Ford Excursion threw one of the walls. :) The most unacceptable thing about that is no window. If the wind can get in the structure then it can topple the structure with much greater ease. Take for example a large stick builing like a Morton(tm) building. It's essentially a pole building with a low pitched roof, large doors usually on both ends, metal sided, usually put on a concrete pad. It's a very common metal building. The building is reasonably strong and can hold up against straight-line winds fairly well as long as all the doors and windows are shut. If you open one of the large (garage) doors on one of the ends during a fierce wind then your building is probably lost.

      They can already build a very strong home. They don't yet have one that can hold up against a tornado. The least they can do though is build a rock solid storm shelter. It's good to have an emergency brake and air bag even if you don't plan on ever using them. :-)

    10. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was a job that needed to be done and I was glad to help out. I'm just used to doing more. Stick me on a skid loader, back hoe, loader, or even driving a truck. It just didn't feel right standing their in my work clothes and my old Red Wings ready to work and instead be serving food. :-) It looks like I need to expand my charitable donation list to include a few more groups.

    11. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      A few big differences between a airplane and a "normal" building. For one, an airplane can move.

      An interesting thing about wind is that it creates pressure on all sides. For trailers, if there is a way for wind to get below the building there is no way to keep it from getting ripped off the foundation.

      The other thing to understand is that any windborne dirt travelling at 150MPH poses quite an impact. Imagine what a 2x4 can do.

      Sure, we can build something that can withstand an earthquake. But... would anybody want to live in it? People generally like windows, and plate steel is expensive.

      It is a shame, though, that in some of these places a form of shelter isn't required. That is the real problem when it comes to fatalities...

  10. Not inteded to be a callus question by gsfprez · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but, seriously... I have often wondered.

    Why do people live in places like this when they get hit _every year_ by tornados? I mean, holy crap - what kind of stress must it be to know that, next year, come May, you or someone near you has almost a 100% chance of having their new house flattened ... again... next may. Hell, maybe in two months?

    I live in CO - we have snowstorms, but you either shovel, or wait for the snow to melt, and that's that.

    What is it that draws you people to live there, why do you not move from such an obviously inhospitible place to live, and why do you insist on FEMA paying your (collective Kansas and Oklahoma) asses money to rebuild your houses in the same Goddamned spot so the next Chet-chasing twister can blow you to hell all over again?

    Okay, that started sounding callus toward the end, sorry.

    I serously don't get why people live there, and why they expect taxpayers to buy them new trailers every few years. Its silly, and its insane, and its expensive for everyone.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    1. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the same reason people use MS Windows: They just don't know any better...

    2. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by nemoest · · Score: 0

      Maybe because we don't like forest fires.

      Seriously, the twisters don't come every year, Moore just happened to get hit twice within a 4 year period. Lets not forget that the May 3rd tornado was the first F5 rated tornado to EVER hit the OKC area.

      Why do people move near the Mississippi river? It seems to flood all the damn time? Why do people live in Flordia? They get hit with hurricaines and probably cost us a lot more to replace than a trailer park.

      There isn't a safe place to live, period. You are just fooling yourself if you think that snow is harmless.

    3. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by tuffy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why do people live in places like this when they get hit _every year_ by tornados? I mean, holy crap - what kind of stress must it be to know that, next year, come May, you or someone near you has almost a 100% chance of having their new house flattened ... again... next may. Hell, maybe in two months?

      Really now. In spite of nasty natural phenomena, people continue to build homes in California and Florida without a second thought. By comparison to the widespread damage caused by earthquakes and hurricanes, tornadoes tend to be localized affairs that are much more likely to happen to somebody else. For most people, the dangers are (pardon the pun) overblown.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by veddermatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      First: I live in the NE (upstate NY) as much as I bitch about the cold, the snow, and shoveling my damn driveway, everytime I see something like this (or a hurricane, or an earthquake, or a tidle wave, or flooding) I thank my lucky stars I am where I am.

      That said....

      People live where they do for many reasons. Number one is economic. *something* drew enough people to the area (this is "any" area", not jsut tonado alley) for it to be "profitable" to live there... either a scarce resource (like gold, which drew folks to eathquake ridden cali) or an environment... the flood ridden mississipi (-sp?) delta is sure as hell prone to floods.. but that's how it got it's amazing soil, which is why farming there is "worth" the risks.

      Once a sufficient population has developed in said areas, willing to take those risks, then another population grows to support them... those running the stores, restaraunts.. etc.

      Then a strange thing happens.. a "community" forms.. and people have family ties, etc. to the area. This makes it hard to leave. How many times have you packed up an moved to a new part of the country? It's not easy. Esp with [insert rant about GW here] today's economy. It COSTS to move.. both financially and personally.

      Do yourself a favor, and trace every product you buy, and where it came from. If *none* of them come from areas that have natural disaters "regularly" then bitch and moan. Until then, pay your taxes and pray for the folks who's lives are ruined by this and other events.

      --
      Department of Homeland Security: Removing the rights real patriots fought and died for since 2001
    5. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by jonfelder · · Score: 1
      Gee...I guess people shouldn't live where there are hurricanes, or earthquakes, or flooding, or blizzards, or wildfires.

      Time to start colonizing the moon I suppose.

    6. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by afidel · · Score: 1

      Because no one community gets routinly hit. I mean the chances of dying from a tornado or hurricane or an earthquake are probably pretty similar if you throw out trailer parks. Also the main reason they live there is so you can have cereal in the morning and bread for you sandwidch at lunch etc. Basically Kansas and Oklahomo are part of the breadbasket of America (and partially some other countries considering how much grain we export). The expense to the taxpayers isn't any greater than that for people who live in 20 year floodplains, earthquake prone areas, hurricane prone areas, etc. FEMA is necessary because insurance companies have the act of god clauses in their policies and losing you house really is an unrecoverable catasrophy.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by veddermatic · · Score: 1

      Hey, I live in "blizzard alley" and blizzards never killed anyo...

      Oh, um. Yeha.

      Well then, have a nice day.

      --
      Department of Homeland Security: Removing the rights real patriots fought and died for since 2001
    8. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by TMLink · · Score: 1

      Well, let's go the whole nine yards then. Atlantic coast should be abandonded because of hurricanes (which do a ton more damage than a tornado could dream about), California and other areas with the potential for earthquakes, and then every low-lying area in the nation that could potentially be flooded. Also anyplace that could get a major ice storm, hail damage, wind strong enough to blow trees over...hmmm, what am I forgetting?

      --
      Every time a guy gets a threesome, somewhere in heaven an angel gets his wings. --Cary Tennis
    9. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1
      Snowstorms can cover huge areas, perhaps thousands of square miles. The average tornado might have a destruction path less than 500 yards wide by 2 miles long. Yes, some of the 'monster' storms can be a mile wide, but 'tornado alley' is tens of thousands of square miles.

      No place has "almost a 100% chance" of being hit by a twister every year. If there was such a place, no one would be living there!

      Technology is helping to save people's lives by giving them a few more minutes of warning, and by helping to find people who were smart enough to take cover.

      !Sig

    10. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by jellisky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow... callous isn't quite the word I'd use...

      Let's do a little estimation, shall we? Let's call the "average" tornado as about 200 meters wide with a 10 kilometer path. That's actually a pretty big average, but let's take it for argument's sake. There are 1000 tornadoes in a year, on average. So, that's 2000 km^2 of damage per year. That translates roughly into a square patch of damage 9 miles on a side (80 mi^2).

      Let's then further assume that all this damage happens in only Oklahoma proper. Again, a limiting and fanciful assumption, but one useful for these purposes. The area of Oklahoma is nearly 70,000 mi^2. So, the chances that your house will fall in tornado damage will be 80/70000, or 0.11% per year.

      Of course, that percentage drops dramatically once you add in Kansas, northern and western Texas, western Missouri, and Nebraska (i.e. the rest of the traditional "Tornado Alley"). Think on the order of 0.01% chance per year.

      Now take the Gulf and Atlantic coasts where hurricanes can be prevalent. I'd be willing to bet that the probabilities are higher since hurricanes are much bigger. Or how about damages related to massive snow and ice storms that can plague the northern states? (You live in Colorado... you surely saw the damages that the blizzard there this year caused.) How about those massive forest fires in the western states driven by weather also? Or maybe the floods that happen in the US every few years or so? Gods, how can we live anywhere in this country?

      The point is that extreme and dangerous weather is not limited to the central US. What happened there this week was an astonishing and record-setting week in terms of tornadoes. Just put it this way... according to the preliminary tornado data, the US has had, in the first 8 days of May, the climatological average for tornadoes in the entire month of May. Yes, we've reached (and surpassed) the long-term average for a month in the first 8 days. (http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/torn/monthlytornsta ts.html )

      Oklahoma City is the most hit metropolitan area, and even that is underwhelming when you examine the data for it all. (http://www.srh.noaa.gov/oun/tornadodata/okc_torna do.html ) Just take a look at the map of the data (which is over an entire century, I remind you) and tell me that people are "expect{ing} taxpayers to buy them new trailers every few years"...

      The southern plains are not as bad as you think. What has happened there is a pure fluke of weather... the same area of a city gets hit by a significant tornado twice in five years... and the same area of the nation gets hit by two or three batches of tornadoes in the same week. Set your integer random number generator to pop out random integers between 1 and 100 and tell me that you wouldn't expect a number to be repeated three or more times in a row in a sample size of 3 million. Streaks happen in randomness or even psuedo-randomness. The OKC area has probably the similar chance of not being hit for ten or more years than they do being hit again in the next three. Do some research into independent probabilities and such before going off on your stupid and inane rant.

      Besides, as a storm chaser, I find that area of the country quite pleasant. Granted, I wouldn't want to live out there since, well, it's a little dull outside of storm chase season, but it's still a nice place to live. It's no worse weather-wise than the subtropical southeastern US with the hurricanes, or the northern states with their ice and snow storms, or the western states with the forest fires and flash floods. It's just different phenomena.

      -Jellisky

    11. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by sphealey · · Score: 1
      Why do people live in places like this when they get hit _every year_ by tornados? I mean, holy crap - what kind of stress must it be to know that, next year, come May, you or someone near you has almost a 100% chance of having their new house flattened ... again... next may. Hell, maybe in two months?
      First, the odds of actually being hit, much less killed, by a tornado are significantly lower than the chances of dying in a car crash during your expected lifetime.

      Second, bad things can happen anywhere on the Earth. Tornados are cool to watch so they get a lot of publicity, but how many people are killed by snowslides every year in Switzerland?

      Finally, severe weather can be fun. Standing outside scanning the sky, watching the TV news, checking the radar on the Internet, maybe buying a lightning detector if you are really into it, then running down to the basement at the last minute and huddling around the weather radio... It may not be quite the same as participating in a mass parachute jump from 10,000m, but it has its moments!

      sPh

    12. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I used to live in Japan. Some of my earliest memories are of huddling a darkened apartment with my mother, while a typhoon raged outside breaking windows. This happens, year after year, like clockwork, and a typhoon hits a *very* large chunk of the country, causing a lot of damage. Let me tell you, a tornado is a really minor thing; very powerful, but so localized that you can have one pass within a mile and only have to deal with fallen debree.

      I now live near Memphis, where we just had a tornado touch down a few days ago. I live here primarily because my mother moved here and I go to college here now. I don't like living here too much, but that has more to do with crime, local culture, and being stuck out in the middle of nowhere. Tornados rank somewhere below crazed swamp rats and cannibal school children on my list of worries. To put it another way, tornados are to bad weather what school shootings are to crime; they're spectacular, they grab the headlines, and you don't want to be caught in one, but they're insignificant in the big picture.

      Seriously, if you can't handle the one-in-a-million chances of being hit by a tornade, how can you drive a car, which is *far* more likely to kill you?

    13. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by talleyrand · · Score: 1
      Why do people live in places like this when they get hit _every year_ by tornados?

      Oklahoma? I suppose some people just wanted to move there.

      --

      "My fingers Emit sparks of fire in Expectation of my future labours." William Blake
    14. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by dapcook · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Spoken like a true east/west coast person. GET A CLUE! I live in KC and have spent my whole life in the Midwest. You are not going to find nicer people if you forced them with a gun! Oklahoma is by far the most pleasent place on earth to be. Yes it's flat at placees, doesn't have fancy this and that, but it has honest people who are good people..

    15. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by phorm · · Score: 1

      Somebody has to? One thing you will find about less-hospitable locations, is that they need workers. Head up north for example, there are places that are more like to overlook things that might otherwise disqualify you for similar jobs elsewhere, and they generally tend to increase in payscale (+hazard pay).

      As for the taxpayers buying new trailers... what about insurance? Your rate is dependant on your risk category (e.g. my parents pay more on fire insurance because they're outside of the city's fire-department area) - so it's all a case of gambling on their and the insurance co's part.

    16. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by qed123 · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's like entertainment here.
      Most of the towns here are so boring
      it's like some excitement. You get
      your radios and watch the tube to figure
      out where they are spawning and then you
      get in your car and get there as soon
      as possible. Theres a lot of hams
      around here too, and when these storms
      break out the chase them around as well,
      but often they have their cell-phones
      handy so they can call the local radio
      stations when they spot a funnel.

      I have lived in Kansas all my life
      and have never seen a funnel that touched
      down. Sometimes we get some awesome
      swirly formations going on though.
      I've missed them by a few minutes before,
      or just hit the basement and play cards
      with my family while the tornado goes through
      the park near our house and takes out a
      lot of mobile homes. It was precipating
      like crazy though, had no visuals of it
      at all. The rain was just barreling,
      and there was this LOUD crashing scratching
      sound, like freight trains constantly
      crashing into each other over and over
      and over. (Had to step out to get a peek of
      the storm ever once in a while ;p)

      Seriously Kansas rocks, its all flat
      and the roads are all straight,
      and the mountains are like a 8 hour drive
      to the west :) I generally think of your
      question in therms of the west coasters...
      kindof crazy to live in a huge city right
      on the middle of a gigantic fault line.

  11. need more coffee by ilsie · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who read this as "Surviving Tomatos?

    1. Re:need more coffee by snatchitup · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Wasn't it Bejamin Franklin who discovered that tomatos are edible, at th same time, throwing at the Dixie Chix?

    2. Re:need more coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    3. Re:need more coffee by jolshefsky · · Score: 1
      Increasing your font size might fix the problem.
      Increasing your font size rnight fix the problern.

      If these two lines look the same, increasing your font size might fix the problem.

      --
      --- Jason Olshefsky

      Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    4. Re:need more coffee by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who read this as "Surviving Tomatos?

      Possibly...but in any case, no worries.

  12. Survival is simple by jonfelder · · Score: 1

    Just do like they did in Twister and chain yourself to a metal post.

    1. Re:Survival is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a F5 hits and you are chained to a metal post, I'm pretty sure you'll experience something else than what a movie showed you. Probably pull you so hard that you are cut in half by the "chain" (scenario: chain tight around your body).

    2. Re:Survival is simple by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      You obviously never saw Twister...an F5 went right over them while they were using the chain and metal post method (tm), and they were fine. Sheesh!

    3. Re:Survival is simple by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, then you look up, see Dorthy's house falling towards you, and you can't get the chains off in time!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Survival is simple by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      This is a really good point, but really only applicable in Oz. Your chances are also worse if you happen to be a wicked witch.

    5. Re:Survival is simple by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      Your chances are also worse if you happen to be a wicked witch.


      You'd be surprised at how many people qualify.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  13. Childhood memories by moldar · · Score: 1

    Funny, I also have similar inclinations. Some of the most vivid memories that I have as a child include huddling up with my family in a hallway in our house. My dad had pulled matresses off of our beds and placed them as a temporary shelter in the hall. During one such storm a large tree (big enough that kids climbed in it) was uprooted from a neighbors backyard. It was fun at the time. Oddly I miss that kind of experience.

    1. Re:Childhood memories by paRcat · · Score: 1

      When I was 15 we lost 7 trees within 15 minutes. The *estimated* 100 mph winds in our area. One of the trees was a 118 year-old wild cherry. I'm sure we wouldn't have been as happy if it hit our house, but it didn't... so all was well.

      There's a fine line between cool and tragic.

  14. Get a Monolithic Dome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    These things can survive just about anything short of a direct hit with a nuke.

    1. Re:Get a Monolithic Dome... by Dictator+For+Life · · Score: 1
      Cockroaches can survive almost anything, too, but that doesn't mean I want one as a pet.

      Monolithic domes are hideously ugly eyesores, with a Bizarreness Quotient that's off the scale. And I'm talking specifically about the ones in Italy, TX, which is the home for that website. They're massively weird.

      I'll take my chances with the tornado. ;-)

      --

      DFL

      Never send a human to do a machine's job.

  15. You know... by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 0, Troll

    You know, millions of dollars and thousands of lives could be saved if you Okies just, you know, moved somewhere that wasn't right in the middle of tornado alley...

    Just a thought. :-)

    --
    evil adrian
    1. Re:You know... by chiller2 · · Score: 1

      It's not just OK. Recently, tornadoes have turned up in Texas, Kansas, Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and Florida to name a few states. Most states suffer from one form of natural disaster or another at some point, be it tornadoes, earthquakes, forest fires, floods, hurricanes, volcanoes (Hawaii), etc. What are you going to do? Mass exodus.

      Having said that, perhaps it wouldn't be wise to buy a house in Moore, Del City or along the turner Turnpike. Poor buggers only rebuilt 3 years ago!

      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
    2. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but all the people who rebuild their houses in California and expect FEMA to pay for the damage when a massive earthquake hits are, what, "Stylish"? "Smart"?

      Where do you propose that people go to be safe?

      DJ

    3. Re:You know... by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. I can't even remember the last time we had a serious natural disaster here.

      --
      evil adrian
    4. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pennsylvania? Massive ice storm. Where the hell were you?

    5. Re:You know... by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      How many people died in that ice storm?

      How many people died in those tornado incidents?

      What the hell was your point?

      --
      evil adrian
  16. Earth... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean move to another planet???

    Seriously, tornadoes can occur *anywhere* where a _thunderstorm_ can develop. That's pretty much most of Earth's surface between the Arctic and Antarctic circle latitudes. Of course there are unique areas within these zones where thunderstorms are rare like extremely high mountain tops, etc, that interfere with thunderstorms.

    Of course you can also build a city under the sea to escape them.

    1. Re:Earth... by King+Babar · · Score: 1
      Seriously, tornadoes can occur *anywhere* where a _thunderstorm_ can develop. That's pretty much most of Earth's surface between the Arctic and Antarctic circle latitudes.

      What you say is true; there is very little absolute safety. But, having said that, there are places on earth where tornadoes are 10x or 100x more likely to occur than a randomly selected place. Or, to put it another way, in the almost 5 years I've lived in Columbia, MO, we have *averaged* one tornado warning (i.e., sirens go off, everybody scurries to the basement) per year. And there have been more severe thunderstorm warnings than I could count. In San Diego, where I lived for seven years, I think we had *one* severe thunderstorm, and I'm not sure if a tornado has ever been spotted in the county.

      That said, the back of my envelope suggests that the chance of my house getting hit by a tornado in a given year are in the 100-300:1 range. Noticeable, and worth taking precautions over, but not by themselves sufficient reason to abandon the place.

      --

      Babar

  17. Easy! by DogIsMyCoprocessor · · Score: 1
    Duck and cover.

    Works for nukes, too.

    --

    "And this is my boy, Sherman. Speak, Sherman." "Hello." "Good boy."

  18. Tornado Alley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who survived the "Terrible Tuesday" tornado of 1979 in Wichita Falls, TX, my heart and prayers go out to my neighbors north of the Red River.

  19. the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by Starrider · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The 1999 tornado in Moore Oklahoma killed so many not because there wasn't enough warning, but because it was the most powerful tornado every recorded. It was listed as an F5, the nastiest class of tornado, but many meterologists say that the F5 classification doesn't fit, because the 1999 tornado was off the scale.

    That tornado was so powerful it removed the foundation of the homes and left barren earth. Unless you had a dedicated storm shelter underground, you were at risk.

    I'm from Tulsa, Oklahoma, and I saw the devestation too. There was plenty of warning about this tornado, but when they are this nasty, this powerful, this devestating, sometimes there isn't anything anyone can do.

    That same storm cell went up I-44 and hit Tulsa a few hours later. The tornados by then were not nearly as powerful, but that was the first time in my life I was actually scared of a tornado. I was 21 at the time, have lived in Oklahoma all my life, but when they show a street level map of you neighborhood and show the path of the tornado coming right at you, it is unnerving to say the least. (Especially after seeing what this storm cell did to the poor folks in Moore.)

    Our home did not get hit, as the tornado hit the Arkansas River and went back up into the wall cloud. It touched down again across town.

    Here, tornados are a fact of life. Most people who live in "Tornado Alley" accept this, and just pray it never hits them. My heart goes out to those who have suffered losses from this tornado.

    1. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yep, 350+mph winds with a base that exceeded one mile at times, probably the largest tornado ever (the other contender is the F5 that hit the community outside Cincinatti a couple years ago, only place I know of to be hit by two F5's).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 5, Informative
      The 1999 tornado in Moore Oklahoma killed so many not because there wasn't enough warning, but because it was the most powerful tornado every recorded. It was listed as an F5, the nastiest class of tornado, but many meterologists say that the F5 classification doesn't fit, because the 1999 tornado was off the scale.

      I saw somewhere that the 1999 Moore tornado had its windspeed measured with a doppler radar, and the number they came up with was one mph below F6 status. It would have been the first F6 tornado ever documented.

      It was truly a monster...

      !Sig

    3. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by Starrider · · Score: 1

      I saw somewhere that the 1999 Moore tornado had its windspeed measured with a doppler radar, and the number they came up with was one mph below F6 status. It would have been the first F6 tornado ever documented.

      F6 isn't a category for tornados :P F5 is open ended at the top.

    4. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hm prediction is nice and all, but is there a way to *stop* tornadoes? E.g. you detect a class F5 heading for a very populated area, could it be possible to destabilise it or to divert it? Has there been any research on that subject?

    5. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by Polyphemis · · Score: 1

      I live in Oklahoma City, and my brother's house was 300 feet from where that particular tornado set down in 1999. I got to see the damage firsthand and even got to walk over the area where it set down and got to see the enormous trail it bored into the earth, leading into a neighborhood full of ravaged homes. Breathtaking and terrifying. The swath of destruction the entire storm left over Oklahoma City wasn't cleaned up for months... seeing half the road signs knocked over as far north as Lake Hefner Parkway & 122nd was pretty normal.

      Insane.

    6. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in OKC, now live in Fort Worth. I think people in most of the rest of the country have no idea how good the weather coverage is in Oklahoma.

      My wife and I had an apartment that was a couple of blocks away from the big tornado that went through Ft. W. in 2000 (pulled bricks off a wall on one of the buildings in our complex, blew some debris from a few blocks over against our front door).

      Anyway, my wife (who's father was an FAA meteorologist, BTW) was watching one of the network affiliates at the time, because she knew something was up, but there was NOTHING on TV about it. Next thing she knew, the power was out, and she heard the tornado coming through.

      Then the storm sirens blew. (Ironically, Fort Worth had at one time considered dismantling the sirens because "the TV coverage is so good.")

      After living in Oklahoma, we actually feel unsafe down here, because the coverage is still pretty primitive by comparison.

    7. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Informative
      Technically speaking F5 isn't the largest tornado. Ted Fujita's scale was actually calculated through F-12, better known as Mach-I or the speed of sound (750 mph). The scale NOAA uses to categorize tornados ranges from F-0 to F-5. However an F-6 is entirely possible. A F-6 would have winds measuring 319-379 mph. It's actually believed that the Moore/Oklahoma City tornado was an F-6. However they'll never be able to prove it. The F-6 is called the "inconceivable tornado" and the "impossible tornado". It's not inconceivable or impossible that it will ever happen (or has ever happened) but that it's inconceivable and impossible by any practical measure to prove it ever happened. The F-6 damage would be masked by the damage caused by F-4 and F-5 winds around the core. The only way something like this could ever be proved is if researchers had an abundance of data and aerial views to compute the projected wind speed based on the ground swirl patterns in the debris. Most people don't realize that a tornado isn't categorized by its actual size. Many hear 1/2 mile wide and think "gee, it has to be a F-5." Not so. Tornados are classified by their wind speed. Wind speed can't be calculated at the actual time of damage (ie, they can't be taken directly from the tornado itself (yet)). Wind speed is calculated by the amount and type of damage done. For example researchers know exactly how muhc force it takes to put up a Ford Excursion and hurl it 45 yards. They know how much wind speed is takes to topple a 25-year old red oak tree in rocky soil. They know that it doesn't take much more than a stiff breeze to topple that 30-year old maple tree in moist soil (because it's soft as hell and moist soil means nutrients closer to the ground surface so you see a great deal of surface roots).

      Tornados are a bitch. People would be well advised to learn about them and learn how to protect themselves before they have to adlib.

    8. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      I have also lived in Tulsa my entire life, and I agree with every one of your statements.

      the tornado hit the Arkansas River and went back up into the wall cloud. It touched down again across town.

      I just want to point out to people who might not know that tornados DO have a difficult time crossing bodies of water. Tulsa has a dam on the Arkansas river just to keep water in it at all times. Downtown Tulsa is built directly East of the river and (AFAIK) has never been hit by a tornado.

      The storm that created the tornado in Moore this year fizzled out as it reached the river, just as the 1999 storm did. Even if a storm is especially forboding, it always dies down as it reaches the river and might build back up again a few miles outside the city.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    9. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by M-G · · Score: 1

      That same storm cell went up I-44 and hit Tulsa a few hours later

      That was a very tense night. We watched as the Tulsa stations broadcast feeds from their OKC network affiliates. Then watched the storm move our way.

      Were you by any chance watching KJRH that night? Their studio rooftop camera was showing it live on the west side of the river. You could only see the funnel when there was enough lightning, or when it took down power lines. Very scary, but very cool for a weather geek... ;)

    10. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by M-G · · Score: 1

      I think people in most of the rest of the country have no idea how good the weather coverage is in Oklahoma.

      I'll second that. The three years I spend in Tulsa showed me what good weather coverage is about. The TV stations all use street-level mapping to tell by the intersection where the storm is at. They have their own storm chasing crews reporting live on what they're observing. They understand when to break into programming and when not to.

      Moving back to St. Louis, I became very annoyed with our stations here. They pretend to be concerned about severe weather by putting up the little warning maps in the corner of the screen, and breaking in all the time, even when it's a relatively minor severe storm. In Tulsa, they would use the commercial breaks to keep you informed of lesser storms. Stations in STL usually interrupt the programming, then end their 'severe weather update' right when the commercials start. It's easy to see their priorities.

      Now, once a storm was to the point of producing tornadoes, the Tulsa stations would immediately break in and let you know the details.

      As someone who's reasonably knowledgeable about weather, I much prefer having the kinds of details that the Oklahoma stations provided.

    11. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      The F Scale does not refer to the speed of the wind. The F Scale is a measurement of how many times the "F" word is used to describe it. The one that hit us in Limon Colorado was about a F2¾. Would of been a F3, but I was busy ducking. Seriously though, I know full well what the people in the Midwest are going through right now, and wish them well.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    12. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      LOL. The F word. I've been to Limon IIRC. Ski group bus stopped there for food and fuel. It was always dark though. If you can judge a town by its gas station then the town should be pretty nice. :)

    13. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Technically, the Fujita scale ranges from F0 (strong winds with light damage comparable to severe thunderstorm straight-line winds) to F12 (supersonic!!). Problem is, F5 damage is typically defined as being "nothing left but a bare foundation", so unless a tornado moved through a large metro area and made mincemeat of some skyscrapers or other buildings much stronger than the average house, we have no way of classifying damage as being F6. Furthermore, the windspeed the mobile doppler radar detected on May 3, 1999 was some hundreds of meters above ground, and not actually at ground level where damage is assessed, where the actual windspeeds were likely significantly lower due to friction at the surface. And finally, we have no way of really knowing what damage is correlated with what windspeed...at best it's simply an educated guess.

      The Fujita scale is not perfect and is a crude way of classifying tornado damage at best (we have no real way of classifying tornadoes at all), but it's the best thing we have at present.

    14. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      It is quite possible that the 1999 Moore tornado was actually not the most violent tornado of the day, which may easily have been the tornado that hit the town of Mulhall (just north of Oklahoma City) a couple hours later. That tornado was much larger and quite possibly even stronger (the storm looked even more devastating on radar than the Moore storm did). Mulhall, however, is a small town with few structures, so that tornado hardly made the news and didn't have the opportunity to obliterate a large portion of a densely populated area like the Moore tornado did. The Mulhall tornado, as a result, produced damage that was only rated F4.

  20. Tornado Research? by telstar · · Score: 1

    I tought we owed all of our Tornado research to Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton.

  21. the first step to taking our shelters away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You realize that government registration of shelters is just the first step to taking our tornado shelters away. And then we'll be totally dependent on our government for our own personal safety.

    You can have my tornado shelter when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

  22. SKYWARN and amateur radio by KD7JZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    A program that has helped (even in the network age) to speed warnings is SKYWARN. SKYWARN is an adjunct program of the National Weather Service that trains spotters to deliver real time, on the ground, info to the NWS.

    1. Re:SKYWARN and amateur radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amen. In some areas, you don't need to be an amateur radio operator. The St. Louis County SKYWARN program takes reports by telephone too.

      Having a NOAA Weather Radio in the house should be just like having a smoke detector!

  23. Simple solution by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Funny

    Four words: decoy mobile home parks.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  24. Why do people live there? They have to! by itchyfidget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is it that draws you people to live there, why do you not move from such an obviously inhospitible place to live

    There was a documentary about Tornado Alley on Channel 5 last week, which showed horrific devastation from past tornadoes that seemed mainly to hit trailer-parks and cheap housing in places like Oklahoma.

    I infer from this that many/most people who live in those areas of the US are not able to move elsewhere, because they are simply too poor to do so.

    (not a Troll, by the way, I'm sure there are plenty of affluent people in OK too - but the rural community really isn't well-off, as I understand it)

    --
    Mod early, mod often.
    1. Re:Why do people live there? They have to! by fataugie · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, that when a twister comes through, it's reported in the paper as:

      Twister hits the Lazy B Trailer Park:
      Does 12 million in improvements

      --

      WTF? Over?

    2. Re:Why do people live there? They have to! by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I infer from this that many/most people who live in those areas of the US are not able to move elsewhere, because they are simply too poor to do so.

      Not so. Most people live there because that's where they were born. In that part of the country extended family is pretty important. Those who do move away find other parts of the country too impersonal and they miss family (and actually the storms themselves are missed - nothing like sleeping to the rhythm of a hard steady rain punctuated by rolling thunder in the distance) and often move back after a time.

      The reason trailer park damage is so dramatic is because the lots are so small. You often have six to eight mobile homes (as long as they aren't double-wides) occupying what would be one to four decent new construction home lots. Death tolls are higher because individual trailers don't have basements and community shelters are sometimes locked to prevent vandalism (that practice is waning now though).

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:Why do people live there? They have to! by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Well, not really, no. It's not really a matter of economics. You'll find trailer parks in any city. Trailer parks are neccessarily the ghettos of the midwest either. Many of the mobile home parks are retirment residences. These are actually very nice doublewides. Do trailer home parks attract tornados more than a neighborhood of stick built homes? No. Then why do we see so many trailer parks destroyed? We can thank the media for this. It's much easier for a tornado to rip a mobile home to shreds than it is for it to do the same to a stick built home. Given that fact you'll see many more destroyed residences in a trailer park than you will in a stick built neighborhood. The media of course is attracted like magnets to the worst of the death and destruction and hence end up in trailer parks (back to their roots?). They can get more death and destruction in one shot in a trailer park. You don't have to live in a mobile home to lose your home to a tornado though. Take a look at these pictures. Follow the links at the top of the page. Look at photo gallery 2, the first picture. I was in that van in that very spot the day before that picture was taken feeding hamburger macoroni to the residents and emergency workers. There isn't anything left of that town. I didn't see any signs of mobile homes. They all appeared to have been stick built. Not good.

  25. The chances of being hit by a tornado are small by Starrider · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is it that draws you people to live there, why do you not move from such an obviously inhospitible place to live, and why do you insist on FEMA paying your (collective Kansas and Oklahoma) asses money to rebuild your houses in the same Goddamned spot so the next Chet-chasing twister can blow you to hell all over again?

    I live in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and I don't think you realize the very very small likelyhood of being hit by a tornado. While tornados themselves are not rare, it is not everyday that they hit populated areas. It only seems that way because of the last few weeks.

    You say it is inhospitable? What about California? Earthquakes hit on a massive scale and destroy HUGE areas. A tornado, while devestatingly powerful, does not destroy hundreds of square miles like an earthquake will.

    Also, being hit by a tornado TWICE is really against the odds. You really are far more likely to be struck by lightening than to be hit by a tornado.

    1. Re:The chances of being hit by a tornado are small by JDevers · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people think of the videos of F5s everytime someone says tornado... For what its worth, a VERY large tornado occurred yesterday but it received very little media attention simply because it didn't affect very many people. I'm speaking of the mile wide twister to the south of Kansas City. The majority of really bad ones are just like this, out in the middle of nowhere. Simple statistics, if you were to wipe out a 3/4 mile wide and 30 mile long stretch in the midwest, more than likely not that many people live in that small of an area. When that small area happens to intersect a pretty large area like OKC, Tulsa, or Kansas City you get devastation, but how many times per century does it happen?

      One has only to look at the video from any major hurricane to know they do nearly as much damage to a vastly larger area of land. Thats also generally land that is more densely inhabited than the midwest.

    2. Re:The chances of being hit by a tornado are small by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

      >What about California?

      Yes but there are valid reasons for living in California. The beach is not far from decent skiing, there are amazing cultures, restaurants, entertainment, and natural wonders in and/or near San Francisco, there's this place called Silicon Valley that should still hold some interest for the geek population. I've lived in the Northeast, I've lived in Southern Cal, I even had to live in the Midwest for awhile. I can put up with blizzards and earthquakes in exchange for skiing, fishing, mountain biking, dynamic urban diversity, meeting 10 different nationalities in one day, learning about different religions, seeing entertaining crazy people on the bus, and heck, being in or near green forest most of the time.

      This is NOT a flame but a serious question, since you live in Tulsa, what is there that makes you stay there? Why put up with even one tornado? For those of us who view Tulsa as the capital of flat brown undifferentiated boredom on earth (heck just flying over it is depressing), could you please provide an insider's viewpoint?

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    3. Re:The chances of being hit by a tornado are small by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      Ok, you said this isn't a troll. I don't live in Tulsa (Norman), but what the hey.

      1: People aren't self-pretentious aholes, like in California and Colorado (I've been to both of those places). For instance, I have trouble driving in those places because when I am mergining onto a highway of course I EXPECT people to get over a clear a lane if they can. That's what people do here. If my house is knocked down by a tornado (slim chance. You have a better chance of getting hit by lightning) I KNOW my neighbors will put me up, give me money to get back on my feet, of course it goes without saying that my job will give me paid leave until I am ready to go back.

      2: Stuff is cheap. I liked San Diego ok, but I would pay $250,000 for a shack. I live in a steep real estate market (Norman campus), and paid less than 80k for a 1300 sf house on a cul-de-sac.

      3: It's home. I've been all over, other countries. I like it here. Hell, if I lived in Florida and a hurricane is coming on your coast you KNOW your house is gonna get damaged. You never really addressed the parent poster's point that relatively speaking, danger is low from tornadoes. Even property damage is low. If you are posting from California, I'd wager you have a 100x chance of suffering economic damage due to an earthquake than I do from a tornado.

    4. Re:The chances of being hit by a tornado are small by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

      Hey good answers. I especially relate to the HOME theme. I'm posting from Pittsburgh, PA. This is my home. Hey, we have the second highest number of bridges in the world (Venice is first, but only if you count foot bridges), and the finest people I've ever met. We also have floods pretty often, and 1 or 2 tornados each year.

      I totally agree about the pretentious a-holes and everything else you said about Southern Cal. I hated it there. I guess it always amazes me when I fly across country the way the great plains look. Looks like the worst place in the world to me. Of course I'm used to driving through tunnels, up and down mountains, and across bridges to get anywhere. Tulsa sounds like it's very similar in size, cost of living, light pollution, and distance to rural areas, as Pittsburgh.

      I should have guessed that the HOME theme would be prevelant since that's how I feel about my town. But everywhere else I've ever been totally lacks that kind of attitude. Pittsburgh is the only place I've ever known where you can go on vacation to Chicago or Honolulu and go into a Pittsburgh bar and meet actual Pittsburghers there having an Iron City and saying 'yinz' and you walk in and say "Go Stillers" and everybody tells you their name. You go into a "New York" bar in some other town and all you get is locals looking for a big hotdog.

      So if Tulsa has that kind of Home Town feeling and Home Town people then it must be a pretty fine place. That alone makes it worth living somewhere.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
  26. Get a good job by snatchitup · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get out of the trailor park... Dude... Stop driving a Yugo, get an H2.

  27. Testbed for weather radar in Norman, OK by landtuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sorry for the blatant plug, but my company's working right now with the University of Oklahoma on new radar technology that should double the warning time for severe storms.


    You can see some pictures and read about the new radar here.


    The current radar technology used for all weather forcasting (NEXRAD) is really pretty old. By using a phased array, the scan times are much quicker than the old spinning dish style.


    We hope to get this thing operational really soon. Off the above site, there's a webcam where you can see the progress of its construction.

    1. Re:Testbed for weather radar in Norman, OK by smeek · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, we ran into these people while trying to get in position on a meso near Chickasha. They were out there with a couple of the Doppler on Wheels trucks. Don't know how well it was working though.

  28. You can use high-voltage powerlines by MickLinux · · Score: 0

    IANAM, but...

    I came from the Hampton Roads area, an area well known for tornados, and one observation I made was that high-voltage (10kV) powerlines act as tornado fences.

    That is the observation. Here is what I believe is a related fact:

    The wind power of the tornado is approximately equal to the electrical power that has been measured flowing through the tornado. That is, in Kansas approximately 1.2 Amps was measured flowing through a huge voltage (millions of volts), from ground to sky.

    Another related fact: the air ionizing during lightning results in a cracking sound--but no boom. That boom is a capacitor discharging: Ground - cloud, just like your monitor before it goes bad. It is the clouds literally bouncing up and down after the discharge and released pressure on the dielectric air.

    So these tornados are electrically driven. The storm drops a layer of charge, the right soil type holds the charge, then you get the tube, which forms a *low* power tornado, but the return of water ions to an electrically neutral state drives it up to high power.

    But what happens in the zone of the power lines? The power lines disrupt the pickup and return process of the ions, which stops the tornado from crossing its path. So the tornado starts to run along the power lines, looking for a way through. Add in one other unit like a well-grounded tower, and -- in the case of the Hampton Roads tornado, it killed the tornado.

    Now, that's not going to happen for a *really* large tornado, but for the small but deadly ones, getting on the other side of the power lines could be an advantage. Staying near the power lines could be bad.

    Just as an aside, what's the reverse situation? Well, how about raising electrical ground over a large area? How about, for example, raising electrical ground by 20 feet over a square mile? Wouldn't that attract the tornado? Energy minimization would seem to draw a tornado in that direction, I would think. [A mobile home park, of course].

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:You can use high-voltage powerlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That whole post is utter, complete bull$hit.

      A tornado is cyclonic wind action fueld by the interaction between warm air and cold air inside the storm and further interaction with upper-level winds. Tornados start high up in the atmosphere as HORIZONTAL entities, then rotate down to earth as funnel clouds.

      You could pump ten thousand times more energy than even the big interstate grids carry and wouldn't do a damned thing to even the smallest tornado.

    2. Re:You can use high-voltage powerlines by Exedore · · Score: 1

      Looks like Alex Chiu has a slashdot account now.

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    3. Re:You can use high-voltage powerlines by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      Except for the case of firestorms, the warm-air cold-air results in dust-devils and non-tornadic water spouts. It doesn't result in highly destructive tornados. The energy density of the warm-air cold-air heat engine just isn't enough to maintain it.

      Sorry, talking off the top of my head, I said Kansas. I was wrong. It was the Geophysical Observatory in Tulsa OK, 1962.

      http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:nZROvmxL6cM C: www.hsutx.edu/academics/chem_physics/kstephens/phy s1411/chapter19q.pdf+Geophysical+Observatory+1962+ tornado+magnetic+field&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

      [Pan down to problem 36].

      The magnetic field was 1.5E-8 Tesla, so the current was about 600 Amps. Apply that to the electric field that is typical in storms [those tornados are filled with lightning], and you will find that the electrical power of the tornado is approximately equal to its wind power.

      When you find a continuous energy exchange between two forms of energy, one potential, and one kinetic, it is no coincidence that the energy of each will be approximately equal. That is called an engine.

      Now, to disrupt a tornado, you can either disrupt the kinetic energy, or you can disrupt the potential energy supply. Problem is, it is extremely difficult to even imagine disrupting the kinetic energy. Nonetheless, disrupting the potential energy source is possible in the case of 10kV power lines, and you can watch it happen in the ground tracks of tornados that approach them. Not the super-powerful ones, of course, but the smaller, hurricane-spawned ones.

      Which is what we had in Hampton Roads.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    4. Re:You can use high-voltage powerlines by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry man but this is nonsense. Have you ever seen a tornado or done much of any research into them?

      You know, it used to be that people said they were safe in a big city. They believed the warm air bubble that seems to form around a city would protect them. That theory at least had some merit, allbeit a bad one. To debunk that theory one just has to list the large cities hit by tornados.

      Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX

      Wichita, KS

      Oklahoma City, OK

      Salt Lake City, UT

      Memphis, TN

      Topeka, KS

      Nashville, TN

      Miami, FL

      At least that theory had merit. There used to be a myth that tornados only formed where two rivers met. Of course that's bunk but 50 years ago people just weren't sure.

      I hate to say it but your theory isn't worth repeating, in public at least.

  29. I've always wanted to see a tornado before I die by dugless · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...just not right before.

  30. Tornado's? Ha! by MeanE · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton can easily survive them anyone can.

  31. MMMM... Oklahoma by cens0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually grew up in Oklahoma, just north of Tulsa in Bartlesville, and graduated from OU. I live in Seattle now, and I actually miss the weather some times as crazy as that sounds. A few days ago I saw lightening and heard thunder here and it brought a smile to my face.

    If you haven't ever been to the middle of the US, and you get a chance, watch the weather reports some time. If you're from the west coast they will simply amaze you. All the weather people are real meterologists (most with phd's) and they really know what they're talking about. When there is a severe storm or tornado they track the thing and tell you at what time it's going to hit certain intersections in the city. The weather people here are just a joke.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    1. Re:MMMM... Oklahoma by qeraser · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only one that missed the weather there. I am in Columbus, OH...moved here from Sillwater,OK but lived in Sapulpa most my life. There is nothing like watching the low deep dark blue wall clouds rolling in behind a squaw-line and then suddenly everything is totally silent (no birds cheeping, no wind blowing...total silence) and then a freakin freight train rumble from everywhere. Very exciting stuff.
      Here, it rains and people have car wrecks. Not so exciting!

    2. Re:MMMM... Oklahoma by robslimo · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Stillwater since '84. In 1992-ish, I was in an office that had a nice, big ol' plate glass window in it when a twister started wandering around in town. As I cowered under my desk, I watched the plate glass window breath in and out (never broke, though).

      Here's what really scared me: I was watching out that window at a 30' tall elm tree that was bent way over under the force of the wind for a long time... then suddenly, it flipped around and leaned hard in the *other direction*. That twister ripped up utility poles, houses and apartment buildings, but I eeked outta that one with nothing but an increase respect for Mother Nature.

    3. Re:MMMM... Oklahoma by azpcox · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! We hadn't watched Twister until we moved to Oklahoma, and the people doing the weather reports in the movie were the exact same meteorologists on the TV stations. Living in Phoenix, my wife and I still break out into a "This is Gary England with the DopplerXL 9000" report whenever we get a "sever thunderstorm" which isn't too severe when compared with the F5 (yes, we were a mile away from the path in 1999). This last tornado hit some of our friends homes and would have hit ours as well.

      The more alerting I can have, even if it's 30 seconds more, may be the difference between life and death.

      --
      What exactly do you mean by "Don't touch this button?"
    4. Re:MMMM... Oklahoma by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I was in norman when the tornado hit moore in 1999. I sat on the roof of my house and watched it travel across I-35.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    5. Re:MMMM... Oklahoma by svott · · Score: 0
      I thought Seattle was always raining. Doesn't the lightning and thunder often come bundled with that ?

      Reading about the OKC/Moore tornado of 1999, I just don't remember it being so bad. Maybe because it missed where I was living at the time, and so I wasn't personally affected. In fact, I always seem to narrowly avoid getting beat up by the elements. Bad weather is afraid of me ! I must find a way to profit from this discovery (or find some wood to knock on).

      Greetings from your past neighbor in Bartlesville.

    6. Re:MMMM... Oklahoma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...dark blue wall clouds rolling in behind a squaw-line and..." Uhhh...dude, I think you mean a "squall line". A "squaw-line" would be a line of Native American women.

    7. Re:MMMM... Oklahoma by qeraser · · Score: 1

      Yeah...Native Americans...huge walls of them and their all pissed off. Thank you for the correction.

  32. Why do people live there? We choose to!!! by Starrider · · Score: 1

    Oklahoma is a beautiful place to live...and it is far more likely you will die from a bolt of lightening than from a torando. The odds of being hit by a tornado are small, especially when you consider the wide scale devestation of an earthquake in californnia.

    These past few weeks we have seen a lot of tornados, but it really is the exception and not the rule to see lots of homes destroyed in the scale we have seen lately.

    I would rather live with tornados than earthquakes, but that is just me. I love it here; I have lived here all my life. Sure, it isn't perfect, but it's home.

  33. I'll never forget the tornado skies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went through many in my life back in Michigan. Most just travelled overhead without touching down, but still.

    I'll never forget the green and purple "bruised" skies that tornadoes produce.

  34. We don't have it here. And we're a quite big... by adilsonoliveira · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This place is Brazil. We don't have tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, blizards are *very* rare, floodings happens sometimes in some places but are quite rare too and not too severe and mostly due to abnormal wheater fenomena as the "El Niño". I'm not 100% sure but I believe our surrounding countries have the same lack of wheather disasters. This makes me ask myself sometimes why people lives in such places, have to been aware of tornados, for instance. Don't get me wrong, I understand what is been attached to where you were born but it's a life threat of huge proportions we're talking about.

    --
    Faith can move mountains. I prefer dynamite.
    1. Re:We don't have it here. And we're a quite big... by PD · · Score: 1

      Whoops.

      http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_283669.html ?m enu=

    2. Re:We don't have it here. And we're a quite big... by micromoog · · Score: 1
      This makes me ask myself sometimes why people lives in such places, have to been aware of tornados, for instance.

      The same reason people choose to live in places where the economy has been on the verge of collapse for decades.

    3. Re:We don't have it here. And we're a quite big... by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 1
      --
      "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    4. Re:We don't have it here. And we're a quite big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's because in Brasil they don't call them tornadoes. It's a different word in Portuguese.

      Don't forget to look for reports of "waterspouts", that is the English term for tornadoes in water, and english-speaking sailors around the world use that term.

    5. Re:We don't have it here. And we're a quite big... by adilsonoliveira · · Score: 1

      Because it's safer? And a free country? Friendly people? Yes, we had very tought times as everybody else but we're going up while some "bigs" are all the way down, with people are loosing their rights in favor of "safety". Sorry fellows, I don't want this to become a troll, but that's the way I feel.

      --
      Faith can move mountains. I prefer dynamite.
  35. Act of God clauses protect you by Starrider · · Score: 1

    The "Act of God" clauses in insurance are why you have insurance. The insurance covers you in case of "acts of God". If I'm hit by a tornado, my insurance will pay for everything.

    I think you are confusing what "act of God" clauses are. Federal aid is for those who do NOT have insurance and are hit by a natural disaster.

    1. Re:Act of God clauses protect you by afidel · · Score: 1

      You must have nice and expensive insurance because in most premiums those act of god clauses are EXLUSIONS. Then again they may be exclusions in your premium and you just need to re-read your homeowners policy.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Act of God clauses protect you by Starrider · · Score: 1

      You are very wrong. I have read my policy, and all homeowners insurances that I know of here cover tornado damage. Flooding is something different, and is not covered (one exception.)

      But tornados definately are. If you have a heart attack and wreck your car while driving, and you have full coverage, that is listed as an "act of God" and you pay your dedcutable and make a claim.

      I don't know where youg ot this, but it's not the case. Tornadoes, hail, falling trees, all that are covered under basic homeowners insurance.

  36. Even more sadly... by jolshefsky · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this whole big tornado season reminds me of that movie ... Playing God. That sucked too.

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  37. with Redneck Adamantium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His 600 pound mulleted mother-in-law. Well 630 pounds because of that mainsail she calls a muu-muu.

    Most heard phrase at his 'house': I wash myself with a rag on a stick.
    or
    Get me my reachin' broom!

    Least heard phrase: No officer, that's my jag. My wife has the other one.

    Fun time at his place involves a .223 hunting rifle, a keg and a stopsign.

    Bathtime consists of the river floodin.

    1. Re:with Redneck Adamantium by mgrennan · · Score: 1

      May be. But at least my parrents are NOT related.

      --
      There are 10 type of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    2. Re:with Redneck Adamantium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking "Arkansas"

  38. Weather in England by sjbe · · Score: 2, Funny

    England has weather that's quite unlikely to kill you.

    Unless of course you find a winter season that lasts from September to June a bit too depressing and kill yourself.


    I had a roommate back when I was an undergrad who was from near Birmingham. Everytime we'd have a rainy, cold, gloomy, miserable day he'd get homesick. None of us quite understood why you'd miss that but hey, it's home right? You get used to it I guess. Being from near Cleveland, I don't think it's winter unless there is two feet of lake effect snow on the ground.

    Anyway England is a nice place but it needs a roof.

    1. Re:Weather in England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That happened to me when I went to holiday in India. It rained once and I got so homesick.

  39. Wait, now I'm confused by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    2) If the sky is green, there's a problem.

    What about tangerine trees and marmalade skies?

  40. Directing Tornadoes by mspring · · Score: 1

    Any change/attempt to direct the path of a tornado by appropriate landscaping?
    -Max

    1. Re:Directing Tornadoes by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Any change/attempt to direct the path of a tornado by appropriate landscaping?

      -Max


      Yes. Lawn gnomes are good for blocking very small tornadoes.



      Peter

  41. Re:Tornadoes Suck! by windex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!

    The next first post will be posted soon, but trolls with money can beat the rush and prepare for it early!

  42. In house tornado shelter for $2500 by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Texas Tech University, in Lubbock, has extensive experience with wind. The Wind Engineering department has developed and tested an in home tornado shelter that can be built into a new home for just a couple thousand bucks.

    My next house will certainly have one of these.

    Peter

  43. Darn clever tornadoes... by Chymaera · · Score: 1
    Unlike the tornadoes of May 3rd, 1999, which killed 47 and injured more than 800, we now have much better tornado information and prediction technology.
    That's pretty good--it's hard to beat tornadoes in the field of tornado information and prediction!
  44. know your weather patterns by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tornados have been recorded on 6 of 7 continents, and in all 50 states. If you've had a thunderstorm, you can have a tornado. Granted, they take a very specific set of conditions to form, and even then you've got no guarentees. Move to Antarctica if you want to avoid them.

    Here in SE Michigan you can get a very easy feel for what storms you can watch from the porch, and what storms you should watch from the TV in the basement. "good" storms track West to East. A high percentage of storms come off of lake michigan, track across the state, then split north or south when they hit Ann Arbor.

    (The city's a heat island. 10-ish square miles of concrete and asphault that forms a giant column of rising air that tends to split all but the biggest storms. Once the storms hit Ann Arbor, they either go north and hit Oakland county or Head south and slam Monroe. Ypsilanti, which is just west of Ann Arbor, seldom catches the full force of a storm.)

    "bad" storms are the ones that trace South to North. Theres nothing south of us (except ohio farm fields, ideal storm breeding grounds) to protect the urban areas. The worst storms I can remember have all run South - North.

    Moral of the story; know your local weather, your TV weather man is a dipshit, weather.com radar is your friend, and when in doubt, go for the basement. (if you have one, you insensitve clod)

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:know your weather patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ann Arbor may be different, but the belief that
      tornadoes skip cities is an old wife's tale.

      Granted, not many large cities get hit, but only
      because it's a matter of stats (e.g.: how many
      miles are in a region, say tornado alley, vs
      square miles taken by cities in that region)

      Let's see... Salt Lake City, Miami, Fort Worth,
      Nashville... These are cities whose downtown
      areas got hit in the past 10 years. There are
      probably others.

    2. Re:know your weather patterns by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      It's not that tornados skip cities. Far from it. You mentioned Salt Lake City, and New Orleans had a tornado form in the middle of downtown. Those are the exceptions though, not the rule.

      I didn't say tornados skip cities. Thunderstorms will *usually* begin to break up when they hit a major urban area. It's the ones that don't break up that you worry about.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    3. Re:know your weather patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto!

      I have done the same ever since I had access to the weather maps. Scarily enough, a few years back, I told friends and family that we would be having a tornado in a few days (a big system of tornadoes, had been hitting the central plains, and it appeared as the gulf stream was pulling it towards us,) and lo and behold, we were hit 3 days later.

      Ever since then, my family has listened to my weather predictions.
      (Anon due to Mod points)

  45. Advice #1 by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Sell your trailer and buy a real house!

    --
    That is all.
  46. Re:Anti-MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK here's one just for you! "And this just in, a tornado is heading for ... hummm we'll get back to you on that, as soon as we re-boot our system, it just blue screened!"

  47. Tomatoes by waterford0069 · · Score: 1
    Dyslexics should not read slashdot when hungry.
    I read that as:

    - Surviving Tomatoes

    I think its time to find some lunch, and torment someone with a rendition of "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes"

  48. They Live There By Being Prepared And Staying Calm by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    See this neat opinion piece in the NYT http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/08/opinion/08KIND.h tml (FRR).

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  49. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get some cedar mulch and you'll be fine.

  50. Bricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let me first say that Experiencing a Tornado must ne terrifying and devostating but why are houses made of wood ?

    In Earthquake zones there are requlations on buildings to protect them as much as possible from the affects. So why oh why don't they make at least 1 room of the house from a good sturdy brick construction?

    1. Re:Bricks by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Some homes do have one reinforced room. Saw somethign about it on a tornado show.. Discovery channel or something. However, my understanding is that you are typically better off below ground.

    2. Re:Bricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bricks would not be the best choice. CBS with a lot of poured cells full of rebar or jut poured walls with with lots of rebar. Brick is not strong in a shearing load. Your best bet is still underground or even better yet under ground in an old missle silo :)

  51. How do they justify/explain this? by caluml · · Score: 1

    Oklahoma City is changing the way it issues permits for alarms. This includes home and business alarms for both fire and security.

    Alarm permits will now be renewed annually. The first permit is $20. After that, each annual renewal will be $5.

    If you received an alarm permit before September 30, 2002, you will need to get a new permit at the first-time cost of $20. If you received a permit after September 30, 2002, you'll be covered by the $5 annual renewal.

    I'm not trolling, but this seems weird to me. Is it standard practice?
    Disclaimer: I'm not from the US.

  52. one word! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    living on a flood plane earthquakes active volcano hurricanes tornados wildfires forestfires droughts big crime we get almost none of that in new york. but now we seem to have new problems... bottom line - don't like it - one word MOVE Anywhere do your home work Use the internet

  53. Pringles crisis by juan2074 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anyone notice the Pringles crisis caused by a tornado last Sunday?

  54. Re:Anti-MS? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Funny

    "As anybody with half a clue knows, all severe weather is caused by closed source, Microsoft anti-chaos climate control devices located in Redmond. If only the source code to these devices would be released to the public, the bugs that cause tornadoes, hail and other extreme atmospheric distubances could be eliminated. When it is eventually released, the GNU/linux GnStorm software will prevent these tragedies. Of course, the evil, neo-fascist, corporate worshiping Busch administration and their E-VIL minions in the republican-taliban party will prevent this from ever coming to pass"

    There, Better?

  55. I knew there was a reason I lived through it. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks. My fat ass is safe. lol... BMI 29.5 (almost obese).

    Actually when this thing hit I was working at home and the power went off. I was trying to figure out why (I live in Norman which is about 5-10 miles south of where the tornado touched down in Moore) so I turned on the TV (it was sunny and clear in Norman). The cable recycled and of course I turn on local channels and they are showing a tornado just north of where I live. Crazy ass weather. The alarms didn't even sound in my town (which they shouldn't have) so I was oblivious.

    I drove by it today on the way to work and it isn't 1/5th as bad as the one in 1999. That one looked like a fucking bomb went off (it was 1 to 1.5 miles wide). Nothing stranger than driving by where an entire housing area used to be and all you see is a few pieces of lumber and red dirt. The 99 tornado stripped all the grass too! The things that were scary/cool were the pieces of hay embedded in telephone poles (or what was left of them) and the cars that were folded like a piece of paper around powerlines and no longer had any paint because the flying debris stripped it all off.

    Tornado Alley still feels safer to me because unless you've seen the weather here and been able to compare it to other places, it's difficult to understand how well the weathermen/women do in these storms.

    My best friend lives in San Fran and I'm pretty sure I could live through a tornado, I hope he lives through the big one if it ever does hit san fran.

    Boomer Sooner

  56. Credit where credit is due by Garg · · Score: 1

    we now have much better tornado information and prediction technology.

    You have Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton to thank for that.

    Garg

    --
    Garg
    Alumnus, Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters
  57. What about the South West by tellezj · · Score: 1

    Other than the relative lack of water, there's not much here to worry about. And even then, it's not that much of a big deal. We'll just get our food and drink from the saps dealing with the tornados, hurricanes, and earthquakes leaving enough for all the rest of the stuff we need it for like water skiing, chip manufacturing, and watering the golf course.

    --

    End of Line.

  58. Stare it right in the eye by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    ... mean ol' tornado

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  59. Why I live here by Starrider · · Score: 1

    Tulsa is smaller than large cities, our metro area is around 500,000. We have most of the advantages of a larger city, with a lot less crime. We average about 50 murders per year.

    Tulsa used to be a great place to be if you were in telecom. Worldcom has is largest headquarters here, and we had many many other smaller firms before the bust. Tulsa was built with oil money, and in the 20s, Tulsa was the "Oil Capital of the World." Because of that, we have some very nice museums (nothing earth shaking, though.)

    The public schools are pretty good, and in my opinion, it is just beautiful here. Springs and falls are gorgeous, winters are not that cold, and the only really nasty weather is in late July through August. Unlike a lot of the state, Tulsa has lots of hills and trees. I have been camping around here for years.

    Is it the most exciting place to live? No, probably not. It's home to me, so it will always have a place in my heart, even if I am relocated. This place has a lot to offer, but it is hard to quantify. The last time i was in southern California the things I noticed were: 1) People everywhere, lines everyplace, bad traffic and 2) I couldn't see the stars very well at night. We have light pollution here, but it isn't nearly to the extent of southern California.

    We don't have beaches, but we have tons of lakes for fishing and boating. Here, you can drive 25 minutes in one direction (sometimes less) and hit farmland, and not be in the city anymore. I can get anywhere in town in less than 30 mins, maybe a little more during rush hour.

    How do you explain home to someone? I am finding this difficult, but I gave it my best shot.

    1. Re:Why I live here by ArchStanton · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the cost of living is lower than practically anywhere else in the U.S..

      I've been living on Tulsa time since '87, and love it.

    2. Re:Why I live here by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'll take a tornado any day (that is, so long as it avoids tearing up people's stuff). I mean, why would anyone want to avoid such an awesome spectacle? Tell me there's a good storm outside and it'll be awhile before you see me again. :-)

  60. That's an acid trip by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 2, Funny

    not a tornado.

    Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds

  61. Seattle weather forecasting is hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes a specially-trained meteorologist to draw those fine distinctions between mist, drizzle, showers, and rain.

  62. Not convinced one way or the other by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

    Since we still have a_lot_to_learn about/from tornadoes and since the poster's ideas seemed well thought out, I gave it a chance. I found a link to the HAARP Project and its experiments effects on atmospheric ionization and motion. Here is an excerpt:

    What Effects Are Produced By HAARP? A portion of the energy contained in the HF signal transmitted by HAARP can be transferred to existing electrons or ions making up the ionospheric plasma through a process called absorption, thus raising the local effective temperature. As an example, the electron temperature at a height of 275 km (the peak of the F2 region) is over 1400K. [2]. Work at other active ionospheric research facilities has shown that it is possible to raise this temperature by as much as 30% within a small, localized region during an experiment. The affected region would then temporarily display electrical characteristics different from neighboring regions of the layer. Sensitive scientific instruments on the ground can then be used to study the dynamic physical properties of this region in great detail. As the electrons (and ions) acquire additional energy, their temperature increases, their kinetic energy increases and they begin to move more rapidly. In the F layer, this increased movement or expansion results in a decrease in the electron density. Experience at other active ionospheric research facilities [3] has shown that electron densities in the small, affected region can be reduced by 10% to 20%.

    Very, very interesting...

  63. Alarm fees are to help fund police paperwork by Starrider · · Score: 1

    We have a similar fee in Tulsa. About 10 years ago, police were resonding to every house alarm and finding bogus alarms. They instituted several permit fees, low cost (5$ is pretty cheap) just to fund the police paperwork and infrastructure to support the alarms and communicate with the alarm companies.

    They also have what is called a "first response" permit, which IIRC costs more than the standard fee. It tells the police to respond immediately rather than waiting for verification with the alarm company.

    Also, if your alarm goes off too many times without you calling in to cancel it, you can be fined. Too many lazy people were not setting their alarms properly or bother8ing to call in to cancel it, and police were sent out on dummy trips, that waste their time and money on a crime that doesn't exist.

  64. Stupid human filth by demo9orgon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I know I'm headed for the "Troll of the day" award for this, but doesn't the midwest have a pretty good "goddist" density? I figure anyone with some "faith" should be doing any one or combination of the following:

    1) Having lots of unprotected sex...after all it could be your last day on the planet and if the females survive and of child-bearing age it's a good start on rebuilding their numbers. Remember, the papists want you chugging out children, by the litter if possible.

    2) Praying. Sure it's just a feel-good measure for those involved, but face it, the survivors who did pray then will feel superior to the others in having survived. Feeling superior gives one group the license to exclude the inferior, and that's a prime "faith-building" opportunity.

    3) Telling plenty of stories about how they survived the last big storm and how much good sex and service to their gods they provided. And remember, long-lasting infections are often caused by having whatever rags you clothe your disgusting soft bodies with litter wounds. If you're naked then it's just the surface bacteria and easily located and removed bits of whatever has wounded you.

    And in closing remember that the harder you make it for your supreme-being to cash your meaty asses in the more likely you are to actually prevent yourselves from being granted access to whatever paradise you're promised. Of course you feel free to interpret the lack of deaths as the divine equivalent of "The silent treatment", but it feels more like the apathy felt at the loss of the great cypress forests in Summeria.

    --
    Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
    1. Re:Stupid human filth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figure...

      You have done nothing of the sort

    2. Re:Stupid human filth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you must troll, at least try to be coherent.

      thank you

  65. Texas Tech and FEMA have a lot of info on the subj by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Texas Tech University (the folks that invented the 2x4 launcher for testing the strength of building siding and other fun games) and FEMI have put together a lot of Tornado survival info over the years.

    Check out FEMA's website as well as Texas Tech's Wind Engineering site.

  66. Buy a print of an F5 by pgrote · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know where I can purchase a print for framing of an F5 tornado?

  67. Re:Texas Tech and FEMA have a lot of info on the s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool site, though I always thought the term "Wind Engineering" was a bit odd. I recall seeing the TxTech 2x4 gun on some discovery channel show many years ago, they were spearing thick steel doors with less than 150 MPH wind, pretty spooky stuff.

    I'm off to build my shelter! =)

  68. You dropped a zero back there by King+Babar · · Score: 1

    The bold font below is added by me:

    Let's do a little estimation, shall we? Let's call the "average" tornado as about 200 meters wide with a 10 kilometer path. That's actually a pretty big average, but let's take it for argument's sake. There are 1000 tornadoes in a year, on average. So, that's 2000 km^2 of damage per year. That translates roughly into a square patch of damage 9 miles on a side (80 mi^2).

    Uh...looks like somebody dropped a zero there. 2000 km^2 is actually more like 800 mi^2.

    Let's then further assume that all this damage happens in only Oklahoma proper. Again, a limiting and fanciful assumption, but one useful for these purposes. The area of Oklahoma is nearly 70,000 mi^2. So, the chances that your house will fall in tornado damage will be 80/70000, or 0.11% per year.

    Substituting in corrected numbers, we get a probability that's about 10 times higher. But then when you redistribute tornado damage to all of the states, your number is probably not so bad.

    --

    Babar

    1. Re:You dropped a zero back there by jellisky · · Score: 1

      *chuckles.* Oops... so I did. *looks back at his calculator.* 200 != 2000.

      Thanks for the picking up of that mistake. I'm normally more careful about that. Let this be a lesson to all kids: make sure that you typed the right numbers in your calculator before writing down your answer! After all, the axiom is "Garbage In, Garbage Out!"

      Thanks again. My point still stands.

      -Jellisky

  69. Lubbock Jewish Clown Convention Tornado by minnkota · · Score: 1

    (With apologies to Krusty the Clown) Floppy shoes and rainbow wigs everywhere!! It was awful!!!

    1. Re:Lubbock Jewish Clown Convention Tornado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should have pointed out that Texas Tech is located in Lubbock...

  70. Weather Knowledge by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've lived in Oklahoma all my life and take most of this for granted. It wasn't until I started traveling and found that most places across the nation had pathetic weather technology.

    The thing that is most strange is that in some places I would bet the average Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas person would have more knowledge of weather and how to read radar. We know what a "hook echo" is, can point out a "wall cloud", and know that the green tint means hail.

    Oklahoma isn't much for technology but if you want cutting edge radar tech, no place is better. They recently did a study near here to see if airborne particles (like would be released from a terrorist crop duster) could be detected on our radar. Never will know the results but.. We also have Tinker AFB, home of the AWACS (the ultimate flying radar).

    1. Re:Weather Knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in Oklahoma, and I must say the weather coverage in Texas is primitive by comparison, even though it can be just as dangerous down here.

      In Texas, you're more likely to find out there was a tornado as it's hitting your house than from TV (happened to my wife with the Fort Worth tornado of 2000). Whereas in Oklahoma, they track it nearly to the city block, so you know exactly where it's headed.

      I remember having a conversation with a relative of mine who's lived in Dallas for 15-20 years. I mentioned "hook echo" to him. He replied, "Hook echo?"

      I really, really, miss the Oklahoma weather coverage.

    2. Re:Weather Knowledge by Acrodizer · · Score: 1

      The green tint does not mean hail. The green tint is a result of differential scattering by water, both liquid and vapor, and the low sun angle in the western sky. The shorter wavelengths are scattered by the atmosphere, leaving the longer (red) wavelengths to travel through a huge column of water (a thunderstorm), which with its peak scattering, results in a green hue to observers on the east side of the storm, as it approaches. Green sky INDIRECTLY means hail, only because the amount of water in a thunderstorm that turns green is sufficient to usually form large hail.

    3. Re:Weather Knowledge by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 1

      Ok, true.

      I wasn't meaning it meant there was going to be hail, but it's a good sign that there will be. Enough of one that you better get your car under something or else it'll look like you've been parked out on the driving range again..

    4. Re:Weather Knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows that, Gosh....

  71. Actually, it really works. by MickLinux · · Score: 1
    Pan down about 4 comments, to the bit about Electric Power lines.

    You'll see a comment that is a little hard to believe, then an Anonymous coward, saying it is complete and utter bull, and then below that, a more complete explanation, with a reference to specific measurements.

    But down't take my word for it. Get as far as the abstract in this paper, and you'll see that this is actually a valid theory.

    Destructive tornados are electrically driven.

    And mobile home parks, raising the ground level, really do draw em.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  72. Need to send a wireless camera up in a tornado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would be kinda neat to see a wireless camera feed while the camera was sucked up in a tornado. Maybe a 802.11 cam or something. Finally a use for th X-10 cam!

    1. Re:Need to send a wireless camera up in a tornado by Negadecimal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe a 802.11 cam or something.

      Tornadoes generate a tremendous amount of EM radiation. Nearby twisters are known to jam low-VHF frequencies (i.e. the infamous "white channel two" warning). Of course, they may not affect WiFi frequencies at all, but I also wonder if the rotating iron in a tornado forms something of a faraday cage.

  73. Few basements in Oklahoma City. by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Have you ever seen central Oklahoma? The land is very flat, and everything stays so beautifully green most of the year round. It rains very often and the water table is usually pretty close to the surface. That makes this area extraordinarily good for farming... and floating basements up out of the ground, or keeping leaky ones full of water, unfortunately. Backyard concrete storm shelters are usually small enough, thick-walled enough and hence dense enough to stay put in the ground, but once you build a concrete shell the size of a typical house basement, and usually with thinner concrete walls, the larger interior volume displaced makes the overall density of the substructure less than that of water. To make the basement thick and heavy enough not to float up out of the ground and crack walls, etc, just costs too much, except for the wealthiest home builders, and unfortunately the average homebuilder/owner in OKC ain't very rich.

    1. Re:Few basements in Oklahoma City. by M-G · · Score: 1

      Well, it would also require that they greatly over-excavate the hole for the basement and backfill it with gravel or non-clay soil. That gets expensive very quickly.

      Plus, people get upset with leaky basements, but don't care quite as much if their fraidy-hole has a bit of water running down the wall.

  74. The Casserole Dish! by MagusAptus · · Score: 1

    "..and all I could think about was Carolyn still had my casserole dish..." --Jeff Foxworthy, talking about rednecks and tornadoes...

  75. OSS severe weather alert tool by Slorf · · Score: 1

    Between the forecasting of National Weather Service and real time spotting by trained SKYWARN spotters, there's a lot of information available to help the public know when to head to a sheltered location. The trick is in getting the information. TV and Radio are great if you're watching or listening, but by far the best solution is a quality weather radio.

    Another option is to have severe weather warnings and watches sent to your pager or mobile phone so it can catch you when you're notin front of the TV. A lot of news and weather web sites offer these services. Another option is an open source program called StormSiren which scans the text data from the National Weather Service's Interactive Weather Information Network. The important thing is to be aware of severe weather so you'll know when to head to shelter.

  76. OT: Nice SIG by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    That's pretty funny... one of the few Latin sigs that I can translate with the seven brain cells I still have that remember how to decline.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  77. Arizona and New Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arizona and New Mexico has very, very few natural disasters. Our rivers don't flood, no earthquakes, no hurricanes, and no volcanoes.

    We do have a dust storm every year or so in Phoenix.

    And it doesn't even rain here much. The last time it rained was in March.

  78. Jersey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. I can't even remember the last time we had a serious natural disaster here.

    New Jersey *IS* a serious disaster, albeit a manmade, political one... but still a disaster nevertheless.

  79. Re: earthquakes v. Tornadoes. by core+plexus · · Score: 1
    I used to live in Oklahoma, and went through some tornadoes, one very close. I was on my way to our shelter, but stopped, transfixed, by the action of the storm. Whenever it got near a building I could see the stuff become part of the mass. I stayed outside and watched and caught hell from my mother when it was over. Now I live in Alaska, and we recently had a 7.9 quake not far from my home.

    I'll take a quake any day, because at least when I run outside I don't have to be worried about getting sucked into the sky or hit by something flying through the air. Plus, as a geologist who knows where the faultlines are, I can pick a place to live where my risk is reduced. I also know the geology of Oklahoma, and know a quake there of far less magnitude will have far more severe consequences. However, I didn't chose where to live because of the environmental risks; it was just my dream to live in Alaska.

    Typing monkeys produce 5 pages of gibberish

  80. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm prediction is nice and all, but is there a way to *stop* tornadoes? E.g. you detect a class F5 heading for a very populated area, could it be possible to destabilise it or to divert it? Has there been any research on that subject?

    There have been computer models done which show that there is such a HUGE amount of energy packed in a large tornado that not even a nuclear explosion detonated in the center of the tornado at the wall cloud would be able to disrupt the vortex.

  81. I suppose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... there isn't a possible way (using any of todays scientific means) to "break up" a tornado that has started before people are killed and/or homes destroyed?

    Sure, we can't predict exact locations but could we have such a "break up" method on standby where it possibly may happen. Once a tornado forms use whatever device/means and it disipates...

    Or is that too science fiction?

    1. Re:I suppose... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      I suppose ... there isn't a possible way (using any of todays scientific means) to "break up" a tornado that has started before people are killed and/or homes destroyed?

      Yes, there is.
      A thermonuclear weather modification device will evaporate all clouds within seconds for many miles around. However, a half-mile-wide tornado is probably preferable to a thirty-mile-wide circle of severe-to-total destruction.

      Another means within our technology is to build a mountain which is sufficiently tall and wide to interrupt the airflow. The tornado is likely to reappear after the cloud passes by, but at least the top of the mountain only gets strong winds rather than a tornado. However, construction is too time consuming for it to be placed in the correct spot in time to affect a specific tornado. (Of course, a tornado can form from a higher cloud so a funnel hits the top of the mountain but that just indicates you didn't build the mountain "big enough" for that specific tornado)

  82. protect cities from twisters! by anwyn · · Score: 1

    I have a plan to protect cities from tornadoes! Simply ring the city with fake cardboard trailer parks. Construct them in a ring pattern so that if the twister forms outside the city the fake trailer park is always closer than the city. In this way, the pattern lures the twister around the city missing populated areas!

  83. Safest place on earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Finland

    Linux
    Santa Claus
    nightless night (summertimes)
    unalliance

    lots of Anonymous Cowards here, welcome!

  84. Fujita scale and damage by Rosenkavalier · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Fujita scale categories are listed with both wind speed and typical damage produced. The 'official' Fujita rating of a given cyclone is still determined by damage assessment. With modern Doppler radar providing accurate wind speed measurements from a distance, the 'F' rating can be estimated for locations where damage measurements are problematic (open farmland, etc.).

    Related note: the record-setting May 1999 Bridge Creek/Moore/Del City/Midwest City tornado had the most accurate wind speed measurement to date, thanks to special portable Doppler units.

    Moore High School, Class of 1988 -- Go Lions!

  85. Who are these people, raised in barns? by Trespass · · Score: 0

    Inbred families, sex on farms!
    Steers, beers, and queers...

  86. tornado information and prediction technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh? The OKC tornado of 3 May 1999 was tracked for nearly an hour before it reached the metro area. It was due to the outstanding "tornado information and prediction technology" in place at that time that a near-F5 tornado could sweep through a city during dinner-time, destroy 3,000 homes and damage (bignum) others, and still have only 47 fatalities. I live in OKC; believe me, we all knew it was coming and everyone who was anywhere near the projected path had taken shelter long before it arrived. Kudos to the outstanding weather forecasting in OKC - perhaps the best in the USA!

  87. Wow, then you say my Aunt's house survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She lived in Plainfield at that time and her house was the only house for a quarter mile to not be leveled. The reason was was that the twister hit the highway embankment that was right behind her house and bounced over it. It then preceeded to utterly destroy everything else in the town. It was weird visiting her a few days afterward and seeing her house and nothing but debris for a quarter mile in every direction. Very weird.

  88. Weather Radios Can Help Too! by mikegroovy · · Score: 1

    I live a little east of Moore(Stella, Newalla, Little Axe area) and we barely got any rain, if it wasn't for my trusty Midland Model 74-210 Weather Radio I would have been totally oblivous to the whole storm. I really think it is something all Okies should have! You can program your County in and you get a siren followed by an anouncement about the weather.(Even wakes me up at 2:00 in the morning sometimes! Something the Local Siren does not do) I live in a Mobile home on 5 acres of Wilderness, but a relative down the street has a Storm Shelter that a lot of the "Neighborhood" goes to. Since the Radio has battery backup, I just pluck it from the wall and throw it in the car with a few essentials(and the kids :)
    Dang Tornados! This is why I want to build an Earthship!

  89. Youch, I'm Glad I dont live in Oklahoma anymore by ZenBuddha · · Score: 1

    My heart goes out to those effected by these tornados. I used to live in Enid, Oklahoma. It can be very scary when these touch down in your town.

  90. Pray to Jesus by Keith+McClary · · Score: 1

    Pray to Jesus, that's what I allus does.
    Dem bad ol' tornados allus blows away my
    boozin' crack smokin' neighbors trailers
    but I'm OK 'cause Jesus loves me.

  91. Why houses are made of wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brick is cheap but bad. Nowadays it is almost never used as a primary construction material in the US. The brick that you see on the outsides of buildings made within the last 50 years is just decorative facing, and not a structural element.

    Wood is flexible and able to bend under light stresses. Brick construction is not.

    In a tornado, a wood frame home performs better than a brick home. It's better still to have a wood frame home with a masonry basement, or best of all is a tornado shelter, like in The Wizard of Oz.

    In an earthquake, a wood frame home performs much better than a brick home. You don't see brick buildings much in earthquake zones these days, and this is precisely why.

    Whereas in the 1906 San Francisco quake, there were loads of four- and five-story tenements with brick walls which basically became deathtraps. Nowadays if you were to build a similarly sized building, you would use steel construction.

    1. Re:Why houses are made of wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, brick houses become rock piles when pushed. If a wood house is pushed, the walls tip over or break into large pieces so there are more spaces where a human can survive.

      Try "storm shelter" or "storm cellar". Houses with basements use the basement to avoid tornadoes, especially the smaller rooms where walls reinforce each other better. Houses without basements, or people who want a safer room, use something more like reinforced concrete or a wall with wire mesh inside the panels or inside the walls. My house has a basement bathroom with walls and ceiling made of something like drywall with wire mesh embedded inside. Many people simply make cinder block walls with steel rods reinforcing it.

  92. Yesterday...and today by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

    Two days in a row, folks. I'm a resident of Norman, OK. We're not getting hit (somehow, Norman hasn't been bothered in fifty years or so), but OKC just got nailed. The latest series (at least two multiple-vortex tornadoes, both in the same supercell) tracked basically along I-40 to I-44, and, as of this posting, is still moving along I-44 toward Tulsa. Bethany, OK (on the northwest corner) was the worst hit. Wiley Post airport is in Bethany; I was flying up there not two hours before the shit (and everything else, including the kitchen sink and the roof) hit the fan. I was back in Norman by that time, but right now there are nearly 25K people without power. Damages are going to run into the dozens, if not hundreds of millions--there were about a dozen Beech 1900s parked on the ramp at PWA, right in the path of the tornado, along with a bunch of classic airplanes nearby. And that's just the airport.

    In short, today looks like it's going to be a lot more damaging than yesterday. Anybody in the area, we're going to need a lot of help cleaning up.

    --
    Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    1. Re:Yesterday...and today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily (but not for the people South of me), the "track" of the tornado was heading straight for my apartment. I'm talking the *point* of arrow designating the track of the storm was ON MY APARTMENT. Lucky for me (not for those around 50th and Rockwell), it went south.

      I've lived in Oklahoma all but 3 months of my life, and I've *never* been more scared than I was today.

    2. Re:Yesterday...and today by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Don't interrupt the conversation with facts.

      Anybody in the area, we're going to need a lot of help cleaning up.
      Uh.. anybody in the area is busy. You need anybody outside the area to help.

      And you'd think those airplanes should be the best things to survive being flung into the air...but they have enough trouble surviving hitting a bird, so I suppose hitting one with a cow isn't going to be any better.

  93. The theory is based on physical evidence. by MickLinux · · Score: 1
    Man, do a little reading.

    Within the same zone would be a start.

    Here or here

    Those pages have the links and the explanation. But assuming you want to get straight to the links [the external data], try here and pan down to problem number 36.

    Or go here and read again.

    From all of this, you should walk away with the fact that tornados are inherently electrical events. They are not caused by warming. Yes, warming is integral to getting them started -- but pure warming does not have the power to make the tornado deadly.

    Now, I don't know where you get the idea that a theory has merit or doesn't have merit. To me, merit comes from actual data, and matching physical reality. And no, I have never seen a tornado firsthand: the day a warming-style tornado (nondestructive) sat outside my apartment for 6 hours, I was out of the city. Another time, we saw a possible one forming behind us during severe storm on the superhighway, but it never touched down. But tornados are actually very rare and very small, even when you live where they often hit. So the chances are against seeing one.

    However, as I said, I came from an area that had tornados, so I have been able to check out the tornado tracks firsthand. And I can testify that where the normal track of a tornado was this

    ccccccTccc [Map key:]
    ccccccTccc
    ccccccTccc (T=Tornado)
    PccccTcccc
    cPccTccccc
    ccTccccccc
    TccPcccccc (P=Powerlines)
    ccccPccccc
    cccccPccGc (G=well-grounded tower-style office building)

    as based on the cloud motion during the hurricane, the actual path that the tornado took was this:

    ccccccTccc
    ccccccTccc
    ccccccTccc
    PccccTcccc
    cPccTccccc
    ccPccTcccc
    cccPccTccc
    ccccPccTcc
    cccccPccGc

    This was the Colloseum Mall tornado in Hampton, VA. The tornado probably would have just damaged the tower building and gone on, if it hadn't already lost all its power. However, as it had already lost its power, it lifted up and did not touch down again.

    There isn't anything that I can give you more than references to physical evidence. If you're going to believe this is bull, you're going to believe this is bull.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  94. MORE Friggin Tornados by clickster · · Score: 1

    I live in Edmond (suburb of Oklahoma City) and we just got hit with tornados AGAIN!!!!! First yesterday, when it took out the GM plant. Tonight it took out the Xerox plant. I went right over my wife's parents house and both her grandparents' houses. It then turned and proceded over the houses of my grandmother, then my father, then my mother, and then made another turn and started heading for our house. Mother nature seems to dislike my family. It eventually started heading more east than north, and tracked just to the east of Edmond as it headed up the turnpike toward Tulsa. It's funny, but they have a tendency to follow major highways. This one literally took I-40, then crossed a little bit of town and moved up I-44 to I-35, then veered off from I-35 to the Turnpike. I don't think it paid any toll. Who should the highway patrol send the license plate photo to?

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:MORE Friggin Tornados by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First yesterday, when it took out the GM plant. Tonight it took out the Xerox plant.

      Well, now they can't make copies of the insurance company forms.

      I went right over my wife's parents house and both her grandparents' houses.

      Neat. How did you steer so you could go right over?

    2. Re:MORE Friggin Tornados by ddriver · · Score: 1

      hey man I live at nw 2nd and Markwell in Moore. Thursday I was slashdotting just after getting home from work. I didn't know that there was a tornado going on. I listened to Rush all the way home. The storm horns blew and under the stairs I went. So now my neiborhood is smashed, and I go to stay with family in Yukon...... I don't think that I will be invited back after bringing the tornado's there as well.

      --
      I found my inner child, then I got caught abusing it...
  95. Re:Best way to survive snow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Blizzards are nothing. You just sit inside all day and wait for the roads to clear.

    I like your roads which clear themselves. Around here we have to pay the city to clear the highways sometime in the next several days, and if you have a driveway a quarter-mile long you should also hire a plow driver to let you get out to the road.

    The wood fireplace keeps is warm and we can cook on it if the propane line for the stove freezes up. The snow also took out the power for the week, so if you want to read after sunset you snuggle up by the fireplace or light the kerosene lantern. The furnace isn't running without electricity, but the sun and fireplace keep the place from freezing. You can wear enough clothes to sleep in your bed, or sleep near the fireplace. If we didn't have the fireplace we'd have gotten a generator or a manual override on the furnace to fire it up without the thermostat (furnace uses fuel oil from an inside tank and does not depend on the propane which can freeze up outside).

    We can manage until the next Ice Age. The 200-mph winds coming down the face of the glacier will make us move away before the ice is close enough to bother is directly.