Slashdot Mirror


President Of India Advocates OSS

cOdEgUru writes "I am sure this is a first. The President of India has urged Indian IT Professionals to develop and specialise in OSS rather than Windows. To be noted is that he made the speech (look for the "Think Different" section) at the famous Indian Institute of Information Technology (India's foremost academic institution equivalent to MIT). Also he reminisces that his meeting with Mr.Gates were difficult due to differing views concerning OSS and Security. What should be noted about him is that he is not a politician, but a scientist and an independent thinker foremost."

702 comments

  1. Great by gexen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great for India. This is a great thing. If only the Indian food place near me would open source the recipe for Chicken Tika Mahkani.

    1. Re:Great by flokemon · · Score: 2, Informative

      It might not be the exact recipe from your local Indian restaurant, but you can find a recipe here or here for instance.

      Has anyone else got difficulties getting used to ./'s new colours?

    2. Re:Great by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Look here...maybe one of those will work for you. Personally I don't care for indian food but will choke it down from time to time out of love for my wife...

    3. Re:Great by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just found a tool that can answer most questions like that... don't tell anyone, it'll be our little secret!

    4. Re:Great by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      This news makes me want to go out and have the all-you-can eat buffet at the local Indian food place in celebration!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget that, I need the paneer korma and paneer kulcha.

    6. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ever notice how so many Indian dishes sound like evil D&D wizards?

      "Beware! Ahead lies the castle of the evil Sag Gosht!"

    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ever notice how so many Indian dishes sound like evil D&D wizards?

      Maybe to you. Indian D&D players use English.

      "Beware! Ahead lies the sheperd's pie of the evil tuna casserole!"

    8. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      retaraunts don't use recipes off the net.

    9. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err....sorry for replying at the wrong place.

      However, I thought I should make it clear that Indian Institute of Information Technology is _not_ India's foremost Academic Institution for Technology. Its just a new organization.

      The actual top-gun institution is Indian Institute of Techology (IIT). Its located at 8 campuses all over India.
      There is one 'I' less.

      The other organizations are naming themselves as IIITs just to use the confusion.

  2. Microsoft by barryfandango · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how these changes in the political climate of software will affect Microsoft's Indian software development division?

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Microsoft by fussman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Attention all Microsoft Employees: WORK HARDER!!!

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
    2. Re:Microsoft by The+Cydonian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's a possible answer.

      Incidentally, the Microsoft India Development Center is located very close to the other International Institute of Information Technology campus in Hyderabad (Dr Kalam gave the speech in I-squared-IT, Pune).

      In a way I guess, it wasn't surprising that Dr Kalam delivered a pro-OSS/Software Libre speech at an IIIT; been to the Hyderabad campus last year, and honestly, it was a weird feeling looking at a lab full of people using Emacs in Devanagri script. (They were using/developing Anusaraka)

      Yes, that's right trolls, they've successfully resolved two computer-related jehads out there. :-)

    3. Re:Microsoft by jkrise · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I wonder how these changes in the political climate of software will affect Microsoft's Indian software development division?"

      Neither India nor MS seem to be indesparate need of each other, atleast for the software development. The total no. of emps in MS- India is less than 500, an insignificant fraction of the IT manpower of India.

      Except for SFU and now a command-shell with .Net elemnts, MS does not do it's core development in India. Even if this got relocated to the US, I doubt if any significant cost escalation could accrue to MS.

      The only reasons (as I understand) that MS does development in India could be PR and to promote their brand of IP and respect to IP. All in all, this development could affect sales of MSware and ruffle a few diplomatic feathers, but is unlikely to do anything to MS s/w development efforts.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    4. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know for a fact that this is not a first. At least one other central government backed Open Source initiative has been featured in slashdot:

      Venezuela Goes Open Source

      The venezuelan central government (from the president to lower representatives) has pushed for over a year a policy where all software financed by the government must be licensed using a OSI approved Open Source license.

    5. Re:Microsoft by stanmann · · Score: 2, Insightful
      U.S. corporations are prohibited by law from offering bribes to foreign governments, which always places them at a competitive disadvantage when competing with European firms.
      And which doesn't usually stop them, except that they must figure out creative ways to list it on their books. Although, it does confuse many of them, as it isn't the customary way we in the US do business.
      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    6. Re:Microsoft by Surak · · Score: 1

      New mass hypnosis commercials in India: "Watch the pretty spiral. You will buy Microsoft software. Open Source software cannot be trusted. Buying Windows is your karma! You are a slave to the Office XP format!"

    7. Re:Microsoft by cygnusx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The President of India can. He is a head of state (not head of government) and largely ceremonial, wielding no real power (bit like British Royalty or Australia's Governer General). So his statement has no more weight than Prince Philip saying modern English Architecture sucks -- it is just an opinion. Of course, the current Indian president is a widely respected missile scientist (and IIRC once head of India's space programme) and is technically savvy, but there's no way the Indian government is going to act on what he says.

      The day India's prime minister (who holds all real power) says this, it'll be news.

    8. Re:Microsoft by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not at all, India knows it is in a win-win situation. The main reason why Microsoft are investing there is the time difference. Testing can be done in India while the US is sleeping, US programmers can then arrive at work the next day and read the results.

      Sure there are other countries with similar time offsets, but Indians for the most part speak good english and those who study computing are well trained.

    9. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS is not a major employer in India (around 500). The current President of India is a distinguished scientists and an engineer and is not venal as DNS-and-BIND imagines. (For that matter, he is not even a politician) Obvisously, DNS-and-BIND is ignorant of these facts and never lets facts stand in the way of a rant.

    10. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Man, we are just slaves to these people. We are willing to work for less so they come to us. A computer scientist/programmer in india gets paid half compared to his counterparts her in America.
      We Indians are willing to settle for less.

    11. Re:Microsoft by OldTurkeyBuzzard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True that it does not affect M$ at all. Anyway, advocacy of Open Source Stuff is one thing - it will rub off well on the student community alone but what happens once they take up jobs in Indian IT companies? Point to be noted is, Indian IT companies thrive on developing stuff on M$ware, with M$ware for M$ware. With the Open Source _business_ model yet to prove itself globally, no one's gonna take this up in India - at least in the foreseeable future.

    12. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By using the $ in M$, I know that everything you are going to say is not worth reading.

      Stupid Critical Guy

    13. Re:Microsoft by saden1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      <>

      What do you call Lobbying? Donations? Political Action Committee?

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    14. Re:Microsoft by stanmann · · Score: 1

      None of those is even close conceptually to a minister coming to the head of a project and telling him that they will not be permitted to do business locally until he has recieved his piece of the action.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    15. Re:Microsoft by loquitus · · Score: 1

      Uh... that's Indian Institute of Technology, NOT International etc...

    16. Re:Microsoft by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit saden1:

      <<as it isn't the customary way we in the US do business.>>

      What do you call Lobbying? Donations? Political Action Committee?

      stanman is presumably confused by the subtlety of the US system. US officials don't often come right out in the open and demand bribes, but the difference is more that US practices are more subtle and less direct than that there is any real difference in substance.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    17. Re:Microsoft by guido8638 · · Score: 1

      Not at all, India knows it is in a win-win situation. The main reason why Microsoft are investing there is the time difference. Testing can be done in India while the US is sleeping, US programmers can then arrive at work the next day and read the results.

      Last time I checked, testing was a collaborative process. The temptation to allocate resources like this typically comes from PHBs who don't understand how the process actually works. These are the same folks that add people to a late project in order to get it done faster.

    18. Re:Microsoft by Fesh · · Score: 1

      The same PHBs who are likely to gather nine women in a room and announce that they've comitted to producing a baby by the end of the month, I'd gather.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    19. Re:Microsoft by senthilcumar · · Score: 1

      What you say is true. The Indian Prez is a ceremonial head and PM has the real power. But then Dr. Kalam is considered to have a brilliant mind in the sciencitific community and the present Indian Govt. incl the PM is very close to him.

      I hope the current Govt gets re-elected the coming year so that the good relationship continues between the Prez and the PM, which would be highly benificial for OSS and for the country.

      My close friend met with the Prez last week when Dr. Kalam has said that he told Gates during their meeting last year that Dr. Kalam preferred OSS and that Gates was obviously not happy about it. Gates, it seems, asked the reason why Kalam preferred OSS.

      Overall am very, very glad that M$ is losing grounds around the world.

    20. Re:Microsoft by slakr · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're pretty damn close. "Donate money to my reelection campaign and I'll give you government subsidies, federal contracts and favorable laws" doesn't sound much better than "Donate money to my Cayman Islands bank account and I'll give you a federal contract, tax break, and friendly laws". Actually, I prefer the bribery approach. At least then its under the table, and not quite (almost, but not quite) as blatant.

    21. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and by responding to it , we know that it pisses you off.

      die trolls.

    22. Re:Microsoft by Namaseit · · Score: 2, Informative

      say what. Ok that makes no sense. Open source has been proven around the world. Its called a developement community. Brazil is already completely on linux. UK is considering. Munich, Germany is putting linux on 14,000 of its workstations and servers. Asia loves linux. Some countries in Africa are using linux systems. Mexico, well hell its where gnome founder Miguel de Icaza is from. Linux is a worldwide developement.

      --
      75% of all statistics are made up!
    23. Re:Microsoft by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

      Follow the butterfly! It is the reincarnation of the Mohatma - let it guide you! It can do no evil!

      --
      "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
    24. Re:Microsoft by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

      I find it exceedingly difficult to believe that the programmers Microsoft employs in India are paid anywhere near the rate their U.S. counterparts receive.

      Even if there are "only" 500 programmers in India working for Microsoft, I'd wager that MS saves one heck of a lot of money by employing them. One must remember the many ways MS is working to preserve and increase its "capital".

      Even when you're the richest man in the world, you don't want to fall behind.

      --
      "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
    25. Re:Microsoft by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Check the link(s). :-)

    26. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably true. But remember, programmer salaries are a very tiny part of Microsoft's total cost base. It spends a lot more on FUD and lawsuits.

    27. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His counterpart in America is getting paid half of what the American sitting next to him is, and still has to pay the cost of living in America. An Indian programmer has a *lot* more relative income than his counterpart in America, the difference is the infrastructure in America means that even the unemployed in America are better off than even the highest paid workers in India.

    28. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :s/Indian/International
      Thanks to bureaucracy

    29. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      wouldn't another 100 millions ( supposing 10% of the indians get this news) coming to know about open source software have any effect at all??

    30. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope this makes Microsoft close down their India development center, stop moving their product support to India, etc. Let's keep some jobs in the U.S.! I hope Canada goes open source next - Microsoft moved a bunch of their support there, too.

      Microsoft - BRING JOBS BACK TO THE USA!!!!! :(

    31. Re:Microsoft by eastern · · Score: 1

      He is (was?) an engineer, not a scientist.

    32. Re:Microsoft by kubrick · · Score: 1

      So his statement has no more weight than Prince Philip saying modern English Architecture sucks

      Or, as Phil would put it,

      "Looks like it was put in by an Indian."

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    33. Re:Microsoft by 3aPo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      :which would be highly benificial for OSS

      I dont think so. India predominantly uses MS and personaly with the level of computer litracy, I dont see a great future for OSS atleast in India. Even the defence establishment uses MS.
      Given the *level of competence* of Indian Programers, why doesnt any OSS stuff originate from there?

    34. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
      <script language="JavaScript">
      <!--
      function MM_reloadPage(init)

      Why is a speech about open source software published using proprietary software on MSWindows?

  3. Will it work? by Sp4c3+C4d3t · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have this overwhelming feeling that India will still be enslaved by MS, just like most of the rest of the world. How many years will it take for Linux to become mainstream there? 5? If so, the fight is already over.

    --
    Happy New Year, it's 1984!
  4. In India by r0xah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really great statement to be made, but I wonder how well taken by the students it will be. A lot of the students who attend IIT attend so that they can be marketable in a big business like Microsoft. Working on OSS while a great thing is not going to bring them the same potential monitary gains as working for a big name software company. It would be great for a country the population of India to listen and follow their leaders urging, but I seriously doubt in a country where many are trying to break free of poverty that they will work for next to nothing on OSS.

    --
    those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -isaac asimov
    1. Re:In India by heytal · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am from India, and have been reading these things on /. in the recent stories on India. India is not a poor country, where everyone is just trying to break free of poverty. Please.

      There is a sizeable population in India which earns very well and significantly contributes to the Indian economy.

    2. Re:In India by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are quite a few large companies looking for OSS talent out there including one of the computing world's largest: IBM. Besides right now Linux is more of a niche because all of the MS certification mills and training centers have flooded the windows market but there isn't really an equivilant in the linux world so while demand is rising quickly the supply isn't.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:In India by pubjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      It would be great for a country the population of India to listen and follow their leaders urging, but I seriously doubt in a country where many are trying to break free of poverty that they will work for next to nothing on OSS

      You assume that

      working on OSS == working for nothing.

      Take a look at the kernel development list. You will find that nearly everyone working on the kernel is employed by a big IT company.

      Similarly with most other successful OSS projects. IBM has lots of people working on open source. Ditto RedHat, Suse, HP, Sun, AOL and others. I think it is time we dropped this idea that OSS programmers all do it for free - it isn't the case.

    4. Re:In India by Charlotte · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Working on OSS while a great thing is not going to bring them the same potential monitary gains as working for a big name software company.

      I think you underestimate the power of the Open Side. Though I have a nice degree and make good money, for any future employment I will primarily refer to my work on open source projects as proof that I am as qualified as I claim to be. Open source work like this - done in the public eye and peer reviewed - has become the best kind of resume and the best way to a good job.

      As the economy picks up I'm sure my department will be hiring new system administrators and programmers. If you get two candidates with similar skills, one who worked at Microsoft and one who is maintainer of some Linux kernel driver, who would you hire?

    5. Re:In India by Alsee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I seriously doubt in a country where many are trying to break free of poverty that they will work for next to nothing on OSS.

      Exacly. No one ever gets paid to write, fix, or administer opensource code. [sarcasm]

      If those programmers in India want to get paid they have to write, fix, and administer Microsoft code. Errr, oops. Only Microsoft can write or fix Microsoft code. The only thing a typical techie in India can do is administer Microsoft software.

      Heck, maybe you're right. If Microsoft software becomes expensive enough to administer maybe it will make up for the lack of a job doing anything else.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ... the two options are 1) work for Microsoft or a Microsoft-like company to actually make money, or 2) work on Linux or another free OS for no pay? Your arguement makes litle sense. I would bet, and I'm just guessing here, that most people writing OSS have day jobs where they get paid to use OSS. Why shouldn't they learn *nix? Why shouldn't they learn how to program for someone other than Microsoft? Do you think all of their CS students are going to Redmond? And don't you think that a company would look to someone with greater experience in a variety of fields than someone who can just use C++ and VB?

      I'm through with your gibber-gabber, fool!

    7. Re:In India by nathanh · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I am from India, and have been reading these things on /. in the recent stories on India. India is not a poor country, where everyone is just trying to break free of poverty. Please.

      You must remember that you are speaking with an American. In their eyes, if you don't live in the "Good Ol' US of A" then you are living in a gutter and probably a terrorist.

    8. Re:In India by ddangerkid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Note that the article summary incorrectly identifies the venue of the speech as an IIT. The institute that Kalam inaugurated is an IIIT (note the 3 I-s?), or Indian Insititue of Information Technology; these teach people to program, as opposed to the IITs (Indian Institute of Technology) which, among other things, teach computer science. May I point out they have an /excellent/ Aerospace Engineering program? (alumnus pride)

    9. Re:In India by semanticgap · · Score: 1

      Just because a few people are so lucky to be on somone's payroll to develop OSS does not mean that writing OSS pays. For the most part it is working pro bono.

    10. Re:In India by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I seriously doubt .. that they will work for next to nothing on OSS.

      This overlooks that the cost of living/operating a company is much less in India. A small amount of western capital goes a long way. This might actually be a plus for OSS development there.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u have greatly offended me...

    12. Re:In India by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Just because a few people are so lucky to be on somone's payroll to develop OSS does not mean that writing OSS pays. For the most part it is working pro bono.

      Make a list of all major OSS projects. See how many are done mainly by volunteers. Here's a few to get you started:

      Linux Kernel
      Kde
      Gnome
      Mozilla
      OpenOffice
      Apache
      M ySQL
      Postgres

    13. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

      What do you consider sizeable? There are over 1 billion people in India. How many of those people are in that sizeable population of yours? How many outside of Bombay? If only 52% of your country is even literate then how many could possibly "earn very well?" 25% of your country is below the poverty level. That is an amount roughly equivalent to the entire population of the US.

      There is a HUGE gap between the poor and the rich in India and setting that aside as a small problem is irresponsible.

    14. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one who worked at Microsoft, of course.

    15. Re:In India by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

      Most IT jobs aren't working at companies like MS, they are working for businesses developing applications. And in my experience most of these companies are moving toward open source technologies. I work for a huge utility company that is moving all servers from IIS/ASP/NT to Linux/JSP/Java/Tomcat. Who do you think these companies will want to hire, someone who can use wizards to build a VB app or a Linux kernel hacker?

    16. Re:In India by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and you must be an indian. In your eyes everyone who lives in America are filthy rich, running around with nude babes talking trash about people living in other countries.

      Let keep generalizations away from conversations.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    17. Re:In India by SandeepKrishnamurthy · · Score: 1

      r0xah- He spoke at the IIIT- not the IIT.

    18. Re:In India by Malachi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must remember that you are speaking with an American. In their eyes, if you don't live in the "Good Ol' US of A" then you are living in a gutter and probably a terrorist.

      You must not be an American or you would realize that not all of us are so stereotypical. As with all countries we are as diversified as the next, as argumentative and debative of our governments role, and have the uneducated along with the educated, so please, do not lump us all into a simplistic catagory.

      -M-

      --
      "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    19. Re:In India by timothy_m_smith · · Score: 1
      If you get two candidates with similar skills, one who worked at Microsoft and one who is maintainer of some Linux kernel driver, who would you hire?


      I'm not sure who I would hire b/c I would never hire anyone based only on the "names" contained in their resume.
    20. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone who is a competent Linux/UNIX dude *OWNS* all those M$ approved/certified people anyways.

      (Score: (Fuck you), Interesting)

    21. Re:In India by nathanh · · Score: 4, Funny
      I guess someone as smug, smart and wordly as you are would know all about India's woes.

      India's woes? I was insulting Americans. I guess what they say about Americans is true; you guys really can't detect sarcasm without a laugh track.

      I'm also glad to see that you have a second account so you can mod yourself up.

      Haha, I don't have a second account. I guess there are simply people out there who know what sarcasm is.

    22. Re:In India by cduffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, now? Most of the OSS work I've been has been on *someone*'s payroll -- either a Linux company (such as MontaVista Software, where I did porting, packaging and development for a few years) or some other company who needed to get the work done where the fastest way was to modify some OSS solution (such as my current employer -- for instance, my Ticket Applet port to GNOME2 was done for internal use on our workstations; I've submitted also at least one patch to GConf which resolves issues we were having internally). We use other open source tools internally as well (though the product we're developing is proprietary), and any additional bugfixes or features done on those tools to better support our developer staff will be my work.

      So... I write OSS, and it pays. Not *just* writing OSS -- I do much else as well -- but being able to pick up these codebases and debug or work with them contributes substantially to my value as an employee.

      I suspect that folks in a situation such as my own are far more common than you think.

    23. Re:In India by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "I seriously doubt in a country where many are trying to break free of poverty that they will work for next to nothing on OSS."

      Next to nothing? Have you checked what a good Linux admin or Compiere customizer makes? Support and customization is profitable. It won't ever buy you a mega-huge house and a private jet, but you won't starve.

      Some of the OSS developers are collecting FULL salary from some large corporations to work on OSS. Many OSS contributors hand over a bug fix or a small code patch that took them a few hours of their spare time and amused them while they coded. None of them are working for "next to nothing" all the time. The distributed development minimizes the cost to any one individual or corporation.

      If Indian businesses had inexpensive OSS software, they could become more efficient and profitable. And the money they paid for local support and customization would stay in the local economy and be recycled. The only "losers" in this would be those companies who want to have ALL of a small pie instead of modest portions of a very large pie.

    24. Re:In India by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Did he say everyone was trying to break free of poverty? No, he said many. Hell, many people in the US are trying to break free of poverty, too.

    25. Re:In India by jkrise · · Score: 2, Troll

      "This is really great statement to be made, but I wonder how well taken by the students it will be."

      Considering that Indian students are respected the world over, even by His Billness, while presiding over a meeting of IIT alumni in Clifornia recently, one would assume the students would be clever enough to understand the import of the statement.

      "A lot of the students who attend IIT attend so that they can be marketable in a big business like Microsoft."

      For your info., ALL IIT students run Linux on their systems in the campus. All the IITs host the local LUGs (Linux User Groups). No self-respecting IITian would touch an MCSE with a bargepole. IITs and indeed most of India have been using computers since the past 15 years or more. Companies like Wipro Infotech even developed their own OSes (WDOS - a menu based OS with Cobol) long ago - 1987. And again, the average MCSE earns less than $100 a month. I'm not joking or trolling here. No wonder Indians consider MSware as expensive disposable junk.

      "I seriously doubt in a country where many are trying to break free of poverty that they will work for next to nothing on OSS."

      Kudos for making 2 mistakes in 1 sentence! Indian geeks are much sought after by the girls here, make more money, have more fun, and are well respected in society. They live in luxurious apartments, enjoy about 70 channels of television at $3 per month (incldg. CNN and BBC).

      Geeks hese days get work only on OSS. The hot thing in India today is embedded devices and mobile phone tech, both of which use OSS as their basis. Indians think little of the 'gratis' WinCE licensing and free access to the VS.Net bait.

      Guess you'd do well to take a $2,000 flight to India and watch for yourself.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    26. Re:In India by arvindn · · Score: 1

      While its true that a large number of IIT CS students end up at Microsoft, there is a very healthy fraction of them that are OSS zealots (that includes me :-). A while back someone made very much the same argument on K5 (Indian programmer ==> poverty ==> sell your soul to M$) and here's my rebuttal

    27. Re:In India by cduffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ongoing maintainership (maintains a driver rather than wrote or maintained a driver) is more than a name, though. Some kernel driver written by one individual might be picked up and maintained by someone else, if the original author doesn't meet the high standards of the kernel maintainers. It additionally implies a willingness to make a commitment to old code rather than abandoning it (certainly a good thing in a new employee!), being politically adept enough to get along sanely with the kernel folks (not always easy), and assorted other good qualities.

      That said, of course I see your point -- hiring someone based on their resume alone is of course a bad idea. But just having somewhere on ones resume as "I worked here" is a much easier thing to have, and far less valuable, than the ongoing maintainership of some portion of the kernel (likewise for most large, high-profile projects with a good number of developers).

    28. Re:In India by nathanh · · Score: 3, Funny
      You must not be an American or you would realize that not all of us are so stereotypical. As with all countries we are as diversified as the next, as argumentative and debative of our governments role, and have the uneducated along with the educated, so please, do not lump us all into a simplistic catagory.

      It really detracts from a joke if you have to explain it, but I'm getting hate mail so I guess I'll have to spell this one out.

      For all the really slow people out there, I'm using something called S-A-R-C-A-S-M. When that nitwit "r0xah" claimed that Indians are trying to "break free of poverty" - possibly the stupidest thing I've heard all year - I used S-A-R-C-A-S-M to highlight the ignorant claim. You see, what I did was turn the stereotype around and claim that Americans are all redneck bigots just like r0xah.

      Now I realise that you have a gun-toting monkey for a president so perhaps some of you yanks took me too seriously. With somebody like that in power you can be forgiven for getting a tad defensive. I forgive you all! At least a few moderators seemed to get the joke; there might be hope for the rest of you yanks, yet!

    29. Re:In India by Sam+the+Nemesis · · Score: 1
      Who do you think these companies will want to hire, someone who can use wizards to build a VB app or a Linux kernel hacker?

      None. They'll hire one who knows JSP/servlets.

    30. Re:In India by nathanh · · Score: 2, Funny
      u have greatly offended me...

      If you are an American than "huzzah, that's another point for the home team". Pints all 'round! Drinks are on me!

    31. Re:In India by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "Just because a few people are so lucky to be on somone's payroll to develop OSS does not mean that writing OSS pays."

      A few? IBM has dozens of them, as do several other corporations I am not at liberty to identify. Then add in all those employed to MODIFY some OSS for internal corporate use ... that's where the bulk of programming jobs are. One company I worked for had a team of programmers who customised OSS to bettter fit the company needs.

      "For the most part it is working pro bono." Go read the children's book called "Stone Soup". that's the OSS paradigm. Many OSS contributions consist of a single bug fix or a small patch. For a skilled programmer it's a few minutes to hours of work.

    32. Re:In India by pmz · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...I'm using something called S-A-R-C-A-S-M.

      I've gotten bitten by this before. Using sarcasm on Slashdot without using appropriate sarcasm markup tags can be dangerous. Slashdot readers range in density from fluffy air to depleted uranium, with the distribution weighted heavily to either extreme.

      Now I realise that you have a gun-toting monkey for a president...

      Please, don't offend the monkey! He's sensitive, you know.

    33. Re:In India by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I've gotten bitten by this before. Using sarcasm on Slashdot without using appropriate sarcasm markup tags can be dangerous. Slashdot readers range in density from fluffy air to depleted uranium, with the distribution weighted heavily to either extreme.

      I think the aftermath of an untagged sarcastic remark is even funnier than the punchline.

    34. Re:In India by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I am from India, and have been reading these things on /. in the recent stories on India. India is not a poor country, where everyone is just trying to break free of poverty.

      Not everyone, just the majority. Excessive government control + Government corruption = Poverty.

    35. Re:In India by miu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It really detracts from a joke if you have to explain it, but I'm getting hate mail so I guess I'll have to spell this one out.

      You should have expressed the joke in terms /. understands.

      In Soviet Russia gun-toting monkey elects YOU! All your terrorist Indian OSS developer base are belong to US.
      Then followed it up with a Apu Quik-E mart joke. If you are realy looking to change those -1 flame to +5 funny then make a step 1..N joke out of the Simpsons quote.

      It seems to be too late though, you have some asshat coward bombing you with overrated now.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    36. Re:In India by twaltari · · Score: 1

      > A lot of the students who attend IIT attend so that they can be marketable in a big business
      > like Microsoft.

      Using and developing OSS software while studying does not make you a bit less marketable for big businesses. It is the way to go if you want to grasp the big picture, instead of just Visual Basic and .Net crap. In fact most European universities avoid Microsoft like plague. It's way easier to migrate from OSS technologies and open standards towards Microsoft platform, than the other way around.

    37. Re:In India by $rtbl_this · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you get two candidates with similar skills, one who worked at Microsoft and one who is maintainer of some Linux kernel driver, who would you hire?

      Depends on which one gives the best head.

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
    38. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think India's problems are down to excessive government control?

    39. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... they're not trying to break free of poverty, because they're "Untouchables". If they did try to break free their families would be doused with acid and they'd be forced to move to a different slummy neighborhood.

      Don't get me wrong, a couple of my best friends are from India. I have nothing against the country. What I do have a problem with is people being treated worse than animals and being deprived of basic human rights because the government looks the other way when something happens.

    40. Re:In India by xzap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right. I think what the original poster intended was the stop people from stereotyping India and starting to bash it for poverty and corruption every time a new piece about some new developments in India is posted to /.

      Fine, theres a lot of corruption AND poverty here. But that doesn't mean they dont deserve any credit for the good things they do.

    41. Re:In India by xzap · · Score: 1

      shut up dude. stereotyping americans as ignorant like that is racism as much as stereotyping brown skinned people as terrorists. you're no better than those few Americans who actually do think like that.

    42. Re:In India by Malc · · Score: 1

      "If you get two candidates with similar skills, one who worked at Microsoft and one who is maintainer of some Linux kernel driver, who would you hire?"

      Depends on the job. If it's a MSFT shop, probably the MSFT person. If it's a non-MSFT shop, probably the other. These days it seems companies more increasingly hire people with the specific skills they need - not somebody with good general skills who might 3 months to get up to speed.

      Also, there are some "Linux/OSS zealots" who have done "the cause" no good - I've worked in a few MSFT shops and seen my co-workers get pissed-off and fed-up with the one guy who spends his whole time whining about MSFT technologies and how it would all be much better with Linux and open source. Those people are negative and not productive, and have sadly left a bad atmosphere for others.

    43. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm also glad to see that you have a second account so you can mod yourself up. Well I will hopefully be able to take care of that in Metamod.

      Nope. People with second accounts to mod themselves up use underrated, immune to M2.

    44. Re:In India by be-fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      He said "sizable population" not "sizable percentage." It's an absolute value. The number of wealthy educated people, even though relatively small percentage-wise, is a large number in absolute terms. Since the original post as was about OSS software development, what matteres is not the percentage, but sheer numbers. Estimates put the size of the Indian middle class at 40-250 million people. That's a very sizable number, comparable to the total population of most European countries. Also, remember that among the Indian middle class, technology is a very common field of study. So the total number of potential OSS contributers in India (which, again, is what this thread is about) is a huge number.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    45. Re:In India by Malachi · · Score: 1

      heheh.. Hey I was one of the nicest of your post.. You should know better than to wave that bait hehe.. you should use the tag [sarcasm] or [soapbox] next time, keep my pre-coffee filters from going off.

      Have a good day there ya slapper ;)

      -M-

      --
      "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    46. Re:In India by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way --- those that live in the South. How often do you get irked because someone things that everyone living in Mississippi or Alabama is poor? While it is true that the rate of poverty in these states is much higher than in other states (as someone who has lived in the suburbs of DC for most of his life, I was actually surprised to see this level of poverty in the US) there doesn't mean that everybody there is poor.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    47. Re:In India by Bull999999 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I've seem plenty of sarcasms on Slashdot and maybe people don't get your sarcasm because it's a pretty shitty one?

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    48. Re:In India by rithvik · · Score: 1

      Correction: Insufficient government control + Government corruption = Poverty

      Have you ever been to India before, buttonhead? India is a Functional Anarchy. Everyone does ANYTHING he pleases and goes scottfree. No other country would function with a system as in India. It is very stable but has a big Inertia for development.

    49. Re:In India by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      tell that to *the untouchables* and I don't mean the cast from that particular movie either!

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    50. Re:In India by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno, seemed pretty accurate to me - and funny, to boot. Guess it was so close to reality it hit a sore spot with some folks.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    51. Re:In India by tshak · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless India's economy is very poor, except for the fortunate. I'm friends with such fortunate - they're in the US for a reason.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    52. Re:In India by semanticgap · · Score: 1

      Dozens is nothing compared to how many people out there contribute.

      In any event a blanket claim that "OSS pays" is false, furhtermore I'd say it is even disrespectful to those who do indeed write free OSS and seek nothing in return.

      It is sort of like instead of thanking someone for their charity, saying that charity pays because they feel better or may go to heaven or something. People who write free software obviously are rewarded in one way or another, but only a minority of them is specifically paid to write free software.

      But there is also another angle to it. Even though IBM may pay a developer to write OSS, nobody pays IBM for it. Of course IBM gets its money in other ways as an indirect result of OSS development, but they do not get paid directly for developing OSS.

    53. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What reason would that be? They're too afraid to stay there and try to FIX THE PROBLEM?

    54. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am from India, and have been reading these things on /. in the recent stories on India. India is not a poor country, where everyone is just trying to break free of poverty. Please.

      Bullshit. I have lived there for a good portion of my life, and visit every few years. It *IS* a poor country. 60% poverty rate = poor. If you don't think India is poor, you are lying to yourself. I'd like to see this change, though, and I think there is a good chance of it happening, but not for a few decades.

    55. Re:In India by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Microsoft regularly makes relatively significant commitments to old code. I have an EXE I compiled in 1991 which I use regularly under Win2K and XP. Microsoft has something like 12,000 employees. If you survive there, you know politics. Many geeks will disagree, but Microsoft actually has pretty strict internal processes and rules about coding and testing -- I've worked very closely with them a number of times over the years.

      I'm not saying you didn't make good points, I'm saying the same points are equally likely to apply to a developer who has had a successful term of employment at Microsoft.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    56. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling a prejudice comment a sarcasm after the fact doesn't change you from being a troll or at the very least a flamebaiter. The original "American" poster was commenting on the poverty level in India. Regardless of what the Indian poster says Indian IS plaqued by poverty in most of the country. Saying that some people are impoverished doesn't change that. You attacked the American for being ethnocentric when you yourself are obviously unaware of the world outside you from door.

      You are bound to get modded up by fellow prejudice anti-Americans and modded as flamebait by those who can think with their head and not without their ass.

    57. Re:In India by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I guess that moderator didn't get the fact that...

      I used S-A-R-C-A-S-M to highlight the ignorant claim.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    58. Re:In India by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      They may have hundreds. I've never asked. HP paid driver writers, then released the drivers as OSS. Intel programmers are working on OSS projects, as are AMEX programmers. They gain financually by haviog a code base to start from, instead of having to write from scratch every time they start a project.

      "OSS does not pay, by it very definition." It's free as in "libre" not free as in "gratis". And the rate of pay for customizing OSS for a business is comparable to the rate of pay for writing proprietary code.

    59. Re:In India by loquitus · · Score: 1

      What... not USA? Hmm... where could that possibly be? I wasn't aware there are actually other countries out there! Canada? Oh... I thought it was a state... Oh yeah... the home of the "Toronto Blue Jays" is Alabama...

    60. Re:In India by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Yes, Microsoft-the-company makes significant commitments to old code. Is each of its individual employees also demonstrated to do the same?

      It's good to know that a developer with a substantial stint at MS is likely to be self-diciplined, though (or at least able to cope well with strict process); that's something all too often lacking in otherwise skilled people.

      Wrt working in a large company implying political adeptness, I'd hope every software company has some internal units similar to MontaVista's engineering department, where I once worked. The engineering manager there was (and, I presume, remains) so effective at shielding her staff from internal politics that we remained largely oblivious to whatever infighting was going on at the time; and she did a remarkable job of preventing disruption from within. Even the engineers whom we'd never dare expose to a customer [*] prospered (and wrote vast amounts of good code) under her protection.

      [*] - we had a few of these engineers, both absolutely brilliant on technical issues but more than a bit prickly. actually, we _did_ expose one of them to a customer once. The customer was (correctly, from a technical perspective) chewed out for what an idiotic thing it was they wanted us to do when an alternate approach would have been more maintainable, efficient, and so forth. Said engineer was never called into a customer meeting again -- but remained on staff for quite some time after the incident.

    61. Re:In India by loquitus · · Score: 1

      It's a real problem... myself included... in the "slashdot" community for people to take things way too literally, and not realize the sarcasm... but I agree with you.

    62. Re:In India by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When sarcasm is misinterpeted as serious, people are all gung-ho about blaming the reader for misinterpeting it. I say bullshit. The reason sarcasm is often mistaken for the real thing is that there really *do* exist people dumb enough to say stupid things and mean it. If I see a total stranger say something truely stupid, I can't safely assume that it was someone who knows better and was just trying to be funny. It is just as likely, nay even MORE likely, to be someone dumb enough to really mean it. Only if I know you better can I tell you aren't really that dumb.

      For sarcasm to work, the speaker has to be respected. Sarcasm from a total stranger doesn't work if the sarcastic comment is the first thing you've ever read by that person, or remember reading by that person.

      So, when sarcasm fails, the fault lies with those dumb enough to say such things and really mean it,
      not with the reader who didn't "get it".

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    63. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, what I did was turn the stereotype around and claim that Americans are all redneck bigots just like r0xah.

      They aren't?

    64. Re:In India by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1
      Indian geeks are much sought after by the girls here, make more money, have more fun, and are well respected in society.

      Geeks hese days get work only on OSS.

      Sweet! Sounds like geek paradise to me.Where do I sign up? :)

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    65. Re:In India by pmz · · Score: 1

      So, when sarcasm fails, the fault lies with those dumb enough to say such things and really mean it,
      not with the reader who didn't "get it".


      Hence a need for the occasional markup tags. They make it unambiguous, so neither the writer/speaker nor the reader/listener can be faulted.

      Sarcasm from a total stranger doesn't work if the sarcastic comment is the first thing you've ever read by that person, or remember reading by that person.

      I agree. The only people who don't think I'm wierd are my family, because they know that I'm wierd. Whenever I try to make a pun or joke in front of people who don't know me well, they don't know what to think of what I say (they usually continue as if I had said nothing).

    66. Re:In India by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's a terrible statement on the moderator who modded it up that he or she found it "Insightful."

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    67. Re:In India by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "a blanket claim that "OSS pays" is false"

      Only if you define currency as that printed as legal tender by governments.

      It pays with status in the OSS community, it pays in ego-points, it pays in skills improvement, or it pays by relieving cases of the well-known "programmer's itch".

    68. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi ritvik
      the economists and scientists cannot even be close to making an organised chaos theory
      based on stuff that happens india
      which india is ... isnt it
      hey there is a price for everthing and
      well u can bargain ....
      hey u can get a tax refund in a day if u want
      only the 10+ % law applies here
      u know the kind of crazy accounting that gets
      accepted by an it officer ?
      ofcourse for a sum
      cogs of the machine move in india ,,,,
      vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv slowly
      and u really need the grean lubes to speed it up
      anyways happy travellin

    69. Re:In India by smithmc · · Score: 1

      For all the really slow people out there, I'm using something called S-A-R-C-A-S-M. When that nitwit "r0xah" claimed that Indians are trying to "break free of poverty" - possibly the stupidest thing I've heard all year - I used S-A-R-C-A-S-M to highlight the ignorant claim. You see, what I did was turn the stereotype around and claim that Americans are all redneck bigots just like r0xah.

      How are we to know you're being sarcastic? I'm willing to bet that there are more than a few people out there who genuinely feel what you expressed sarcastically. Given that we Americans are constantly being lambasted for not being culturally sensitive enough, you'll forgive us if we get a bit irritated when others behave insensitively toward us.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    70. Re:In India by jvalenzu · · Score: 1

      I think the aftermath of an untagged sarcastic remark is even funnier than the punchline.

      Now you understand why trolls are the best part of Slashdot.

    71. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As the economy picks up I'm sure my department will be hiring new system administrators and programmers. If you get two candidates with similar skills, one who worked at Microsoft and one who is maintainer of some Linux kernel driver, who would you hire?


      I'd hire the candidate from Microsoft, because I wouldn't trust you with proprietetary trade-secrets I know that if I hired you, you are a potential security risk who might want to distribute out source code in the spirit of GPL, and I cannot tolerate that.

    72. Re:In India by semanticgap · · Score: 1

      Well I was replying to the argument that IBM has OSS developers on staff - I hope they get paid in currency, not ego-points :-) (My grocery store does not accept ego-points... yet)

    73. Re:In India by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Jeez, what kind of American drinks "pints". It's bottles, cans, or Super Big Gulps. Pints are for furriners or them pantywaist yuppie-types who insist on drinking something besides Bud or Coors.

    74. Re:In India by runlvl0 · · Score: 1
      India is not a poor country, where everyone is just trying to break free of poverty. Please.
      No, but 25% of Indians do live below the poverty line, in a country where per capita GDP for 2002 was only $2,540. Please, indeed.
      - source, CIA World Factbook
      You must remember that you are speaking with an American. In their eyes, if you don't live in the "Good Ol' US of A" then you are living in a gutter and probably a terrorist.
      And, of course, to our credulous Aussie: Australia per capita GDP $27,000 (2002 est.) - U.S. per capita GDP, $36,300 (2001 est.). Same source.

      Suck on it, gutter-dweller.

      (With apologies to the big dog, Luxembourg, at $44,000. Source)
      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    75. Re:In India by TruthTeller · · Score: 1

      You can not take a spl case and make it generalised. Every country has a soul. In India, it is spirituality. The best of breed in India always go for that and the materialistic world comes secondary. True...outwardly, it is not attractive *relative* to US. India believes that "society has to go after truth & not the other way". And the truths discovered by modern physics, such as "relativeness of time" / "boot strap theory of quantum mechanics" etc., were discovered 5000 years back in India and are the basis of Indian culture. So they never give first preference to materialistic things. Infact realising them are part of realising the truth. As an Indian, I wish my country always to give first preference to truth and next to materialistic needs - even if this means, taking little more time to develop outwardly. (Sorry for posting these comments here but could not control myself after reading the comments.)

    76. Re:In India by jjsoh · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the one with the biggest breasts? Did they change the qualifications around?

    77. Re:In India by cyberformer · · Score: 1

      More importantly, most people are not programmers, and most companies are not in the business of selling software. If you're poor and trying to break free of poverty (or even if you're rich and trying to get richer), the concept of not having to pay Microsoft's exhorbitant licensing fees is very attractive.

    78. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i guess its no surprise its funny to you, since you are the same type who regard "M$" is a stinging insult too.

    79. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the real problem:

      Our Australian comedian (who wishes so bad that he were Euro-trash) really does believe his "sarcasm." He is not only ignorant of America, but thanks to a political correctness inherited third hand from (you guessed it) Americans, and ignorance of India, he believes that one poster on slashdot and the PC fairy means that there is no poverty in the world that was not created by White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (and pedophile Catholic) Americans and Jews the world wide. Never mind that he is in fact a White Anglo-Saxon renounced Protestant (or perhaps renounced Catholic)

      In fact, there are many impoverished people in India (more than any other country except China) and that by American standards, all but the richest 0.001% of Indians are in poverty. The ignorant (hypothetical) American poster above had the gall to suggest that some (nay, many) "are trying to break free of poverty" as if free will were involved in the process. Denying that right is unpopular, so the (nominally) Australian poster resorts to attacking the assumption that poverty exists in India rather than claiming that Indians in poverty may possess the desire, or even ability to rise from their inferior dark-skinned different-cultured (but not worse) state.

      In short, he is just projecting his racism onto others, and assuaging his guilt by pretending that the slaves really do enjoy building pyramids because it's in their genetic [hooked noses/brown skin] and that thank God (not really) people like him were born into positions of wealth and power, because by God, think how miserable the poor janitor would be if he had to live in a big house drive a sports car and sit around doing nothing all day.

    80. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      were you insulting america or was it sarcasm?

      Fucking idiot.

    81. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realise that the to most of middle class of India, primarily those in technology, themselves consider a half-pay H1-B job to be a dream of absolute wealth.

    82. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you must not be American. Everyone who lives here is filthy rich and runs around with nude trash-talking babes. Hot ones too!

    83. Re:In India by loquitus · · Score: 1

      Incidentally... stfu with the term "America". It was an idiot who decided to call the US of A, America, and it is a bunch of ignoramuses who continue that stupid tradition. Perhaps Mexicans should just call their country, Earth?

    84. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough, I have Indian friends in the IT industry, and know first hand that they didn't "break free of poverty". Well, at least not in their current life. Their parents are wealthy, and they themselves are rather talented and doing well for themselves.

      However, to say that India is not a (economically) poor country is pushing it a bit. I've travelled India for 2 months and think that says more than most of the trolls out there that probably don't even know WHERE India is. Yes, there are wealthy people, but there are a LOT more people that are living in poverty. And I'm not talking about "I'm working at WalMart and can't pay my car bill" poverty, or even "I've only got food stamps" poverty. I'm talking about "I don't have a place to live" poverty, "I wish my kids could get a good education, but damned if I can afford to not have them work all day!" poverty, and "Computer!? Microsoft!? Piracy!? I'd pirate myself a copy of that damn chicken if I could!" poverty. Don't fool yourself into thinking that just because YOU are doing well means that the majority of India is. Most people can't afford a computer, and many can't even afford to be in an Internet Cafe.

      That said... I guess those that have a choice between Microsoft or OSS aren't really in poverty (I'm sure the same could be said for most computer owners in the U.S. too) and are certainly not trying to "break free" or anything. But either way, when India gets it's economy going and computers are more widespread (remember, computers aren't only for IT professionals but also for individuals with a thirst for information) it would probably be helpfull if you could get less people per computer by knocking off OS and software costs by running OSS. It's stupid enough that Americans need to pay so much for Microsoft's crap, but to demand a similar cost in India by making sure India is locked into Microsoft is, well, a crime by my standards. Power to India and it's people!

    85. Re:In India by anandcp · · Score: 0

      gun-toting monkey for a president so Atleast we don;t have a confirmed war-mongrel, with big investments in oil companies and who plans to dig up his own Alaska for oil as a president. Thank God ! for small favours

      --
      -------- Cluster bombing from B-52s is very, very accurate -- the bombs always hit the ground.
    86. Re:In India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (define (.sig) (cons 'my (list 'other 'car 'is 'a 'cdr)))

      Arrrgggghh!!! I've spent the last 6 years trying to forget that Lisp/AI class I took in college, and now it's all coming back to me. I will now be seeing cdr 's and parans in my sleep.....

      Arrgghhh! Lots of Stupid and Irritating Parenthesis must die!!

    87. Re:In India by sawanv · · Score: 1

      You are very wrong my friend. Just vist any village and ask any ordinary peasant/farmer what he would be willing to do for a slave labour job in a western country.... Just visit any slum in Bombay ( 50 % of the city is a slum) or Calcutt and Delhi and ask them the same question.... Visit any random middle class home and ask what they would give for their children to get out of India... Visit any IIT and ask the CS students what is their ultimate goal in life ( 80% will answer getting out of India, not working for MS, Infosyss, etc in India). Ask any Indian student in America, Australia, etc what he is willing to tolerate just in order to get out of his homeland (the answer is desprete home sickness, racism, cultural shock, etc). Just ask them what they would prefer, working as an engineer in India or a cleaner in California. They would choose the latter as they know that this choice would better their lives and more importantly that of their children. It is extremely difficult to fins people like Dr Kalam in India any more. This guy was the countries premire scientist (that too in arcane things like nuclear/missile) and yet he used to live in one room. He didnt get married and have afamily in order to pursue his single minded goal of dragging India into the missile age. Try finding a student in the IITs with that kind of attiyude today. India is a poor country. No one is interested in eradicating poverty. All they care about is getting themselves out. If you are an Indian, I suggets you go out and take acloser look at your country.

    88. Re:In India by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Realize also that a half-pay H1-B job (in US currency) means a hell of a lot more in India than it does here. A dollar there goes a lot futher than the conversion rate would imply. Someone drawing a middle class salary in the US can live like a rich man in India. Also remember that these statistics take that into account. The upper number (250 million) is middle class by optimistic Indian standards. The lower number (40 million) is the middle class by conservative Western standards. Either way you slice it, that's a lot of people.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    89. Re:In India by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      It's good to know that a developer with a substantial stint at MS is likely to be self-diciplined, though (or at least able to cope well with strict process)
      What kind of self discipline or strict process results in a spreadsheet with a goddam flight simulator hidden in it?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. He talked to BillG about opensource.. by heytal · · Score: 2, Redundant

    In his speech, he said:
    I would like to narrate an event that took place in Rashtrapati Bhavan a few months back when I met Bill Gates, the CEO of Microsoft. While walking in the Mughal garden, we were discussing the future challenges in Information Technology including the issues related to software security. I made a point that we look for open source codes so that we can easily introduce the users built security algorithms. Our discussions became difficult since our views were different.

    1. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think open source code has great potential to enhance the security of algorithms. What are your thoughts on this?
      <BillyG> Open source is evil!
      <IndyPM> But...
      <BillyG> EVIL I SAY!!
      <IndyPM> ...

    2. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by Cally · · Score: 1

      Our discussions became difficult since our views were different.

      *choke* lor' lumme,.. I'd love to have been a fly on that wall!

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    3. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by jkrise · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also remember reading articles today, by a couple of Americans - the outgoing Robert Blackwill, mentioning the imbalance in trade between the US and India - 5 billion vs. 15 billion; and another gentleman suggesting India open it's markets to leading American hitech firms - Boeing and Microsoft! Boeing maybe, but Microsoft?

      Considering SFU was developed entirely in India, as well as the fact that all top 20 IT and commn giants have a direct presence in India, Microsoft would come rather late in th list of hitech firms.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    4. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by rsidd · · Score: 1

      And as for Boeing, they have only one competitor in the passenger aircraft space, Airbus. India doesn't make its own, but the airline companies use both extensively. Recently there have been talks of large purchase orders from Airbus, which perhaps has the US worried.

    5. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:

      Bill Gates: We'll give you Windows for free!

    6. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by Eagle7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you... I am now less intelligent as a result of having read that comment.

      --
      _sig_ is away
    7. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by axxackall · · Score: 1

      Airbus is not the only Boeing's competitor in India - don't forget about Russian airjets.

      --

      Less is more !
    8. Re:He talked to BillG about opensource.. by sgups · · Score: 1

      Nope. I think all major Indian airlines including the private ones use Airbus/Boeing exclusively.

      --
      Democratic USA - Government of the corporations, by the Corporations, for the corporations.
  6. Indian president is a technocrat.. by heytal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot readers may remember that APJ Abdul Kalam, the President of India, is a scientist. He has worked towards developing missiles and the nuclear research of India. He is indeed a rocket scientist.

    1. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is embarrassing actually. We're not even sure Bush can read without some help sounding-out the big words...

    2. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      Why is this funny?

    3. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by FroMan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      What a load of crap. Only on slashdot would this be modded insightful.

      Where are the troll moderations or insiteful moderations on this?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    4. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by gmajor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Abdul Kalam is no scientist. That is just the way he has marketed himself in order to maximize political gains.

      You will probably say that he worked 40 years in the DRDO, India's main Defense research organization. He was an administrator (i.e. management) for DRDO, not a scientist. And his "doctorate" is an honorary doctorate --- he only holds a Bachelor's degree.

      100% politician.

    5. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by WillAdams · · Score: 1, Troll

      President Bush has a pilot's license and flew F-102 Delta Darts in the Air National Guard---have you ever flown a plane from Texas to Washington DC? (Bush did that once for a date w/ Pres. Nixon's daughter Pat ;) He's bi-lingual (Spanish) and has an MBA from Yale. I don't see the occasional stutter or mis-wording as that big a deal---character is a lot more important, and he's far more a man of his word than Al Gore. What's ironic is his shift in attitude (influenced by his advisors I believe) on foreign policy---before election, ``humble'', after ``resolute and determined''.

      As regards India's president---I really think they need a reformer who's willing to dismantle their caste system rather than a technocrat. Gandhi once said ``an eye for an eye results in a nation of the blind''---I suppose I'd have a similar opinion of human morality / nature if I lived in a nation which tolerates systematic human degradation as India does.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    6. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reserved for the people that can spell "insightful". Come on, you see it on the posts all the time, you could at least try to remember.

    7. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big hint -- I don't think the ./ moderators are
      big G.W. Bush supporters. At least it shows they aren't 'President can do no wrong' patrio-zealots, which would be much, much worse IMHO.

    8. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...?
      Northamericans -please, dont use "american"; america is mucho more that US, the rest of the continent isn't your backyard- don't have much moral authority here... stuff like "if you are a C student, dont worry you still can be president" comes to my mind.
      also...i'm sure indian president talk better english than George W. Bush.

    9. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by FroMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      One would almost think you were insightful. Except, you see that I did indeed spell it correctly previously in the post. I did spell "insiteful" wrong though, it was supposed to be "inciteful", as in baiting a person, flaimbait anyways.

      So, next time you think you are clever, make sure you are truly clever. It was obvious I think that I did not mean the same "insightful" as you were thinking. And since it was spelled correctly not more than 20 words before, you look like a grammar/spelling nazi.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    10. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this crap from a man with a jingoistic troll-bait sig? Pot? The kettle's calling...

    11. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by drMental · · Score: 1

      "What's ironic is his shift in attitude (influenced by his advisors I believe) on foreign policy---before election, ``humble'', after ``resolute and determined''."

      Coult it possible have something to do with airplanes flying into buidings.

    12. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by FroMan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Insightful: wrong
      Informative: wrong
      Interesting: Maybe if you have a very small mind
      Funny: Sure, I get a chuckle out of it
      Underrated/Overrated: not really
      Offtopic: yes
      Flamebait: yes
      Troll: possibley

      Now, lets review, are you saying that it is accurate to claim that:

      This is embarrassing actually. We're not even sure Bush can read without some help sounding-out the big words...

      Is Insightful? What insight does this lend to your life? You are obviously already slanted against the president. Has it let you think of him in a new way that will enrich your life? If you answer yes to that you are a very shallow person. Here's a website more up your alley.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    13. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You have certainly shown President Bush has a proud lineage stemming from the American ruling class ('Bush' sounds familiar somehow...) -- a group that could afford to send him to an Ivy-league school, even if he's a turnip (and afford to joy-ride in planes). But I'm afraid none of this says *anything* about his intelligence -- only that he is very well connected. My dog is 'bilingual', so what? If you grew up in a mixed language environment, you wouldn't be so easily impressed.

    14. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by FroMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I could care less what folks write here. Heck, if you want to say you think the president is a massive mound of poop that has been formed into the shape of a human being and is controlled by millions of flies that buzz their wings in perfect harmony to sound like him talking, go ahead. I don't care.

      But, my point is moderation. If you were to moderate the above with "insightful", "informative", "interesting" you are an idiot. You have no descernment over such things. If you moderate it as funny or offtopic, fine. If you moderate it as troll or flamebait, you are probably right on mark.

      While I have an inciteful/funny sig, it does not mean that my posts are always flamebait or funny. The sig is a handle, not the content. The content should be moderated as it is.

      However, here on slashdot we don't care that "insightful", "informative", "interesting", "funny", "underrated", "overrated", "offtopic", "troll", "flamebait" mean anything. Lets just mark things positive that we agree with and mark things negative which we disagree with. Learn those special words, what they mean, then moderate.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    15. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by rahulnair · · Score: 3, Informative

      NASA invited this "politician" to spend 4 months at the the Wallops Island Rocketry Centre and the Langley Research Centre.

      He also has a DMIT in Aeospace Engineering from MIT (Madras) which incidentally has 2 nobel laureates which is more than can be said than for several american school including Georgia tech(Jimmy Carter's prize for peace hardly counts) If you really want to learn about this great man and his career read his autobiography "Wings of fire"

    16. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by intelligent+poster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And this shows that he is smart how? Having a pilot's license is a measure of intelligence. ROFL. So did Mohammed Ata, and I am sure that he is not exactly classified as an Einstein. Dr. Kalam speaks at least four languages (and I am probably understanting it a fair bit - Tamil, Hindi, English, and yes Urdu - he is a _Muslim_. What does that say about tolerance/diversity?) You think speaking Spanish is hard? I have picked up the language in two months, its so similar to English. Try doing that with any two of the languages I just mentioned above.

      Getting a degree from Yale (or Harvard, whatever and with a C average to boot) is *definitely* not always a measure of intelligence. Getting into an Ivy league school only requires money and influence. Let me quote

      He [Kalam] is the Vice President of Astronautical Society of India, Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering and Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore, and an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers ...... (edited for brevity)

      As regard's America's president -- I really think they need a reformer who is willing to have the courage to come up with concrete solutions to the problems created by the US and other countries rather than someone who wakes up in the morning and decided it would be fun to invade another country to improve his popularity ratings (and a "terror dial" to scare gullible Americans. Orange and everyone runs to hide under the kichten table and store duct tape. He He. What a riot). This country is so blind to news from outside. As you might have guessed by now, I am from India and when I see that something called __World__ news tonight has as lead story something about fighting in Israel and all other stories items like how some guy was arrested in Texas someplace for smoking pot or whatever, I realize how important world news really is to this country. And this even after "everything changed" after ...... ....... .......
      drumroll ..... .....

      9/11!!!

      I suppose I'd have a similar opinion of human morality / nature if I lived in a nation which tolerates systematic human degradation as India does.

    17. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      As regards India's president---I really think they need a reformer who's willing to dismantle their caste system rather than a technocrat.

      The latest edition of National Geographic has a startling article on India's caste system. If you think US minorities have the hardest row to hoe, check out this article.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    18. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      character is a lot more important, and he's far more a man of his word than Al Gore

      And let's not forget:

      - he's a deserter who went AWOL for 2 years and never saw the inside of a prison for his actions;

      - he's a drug addict and alcoholic;

      - he's currently involved in some of the shadiest deals ever administered by a U.S. President re the 'rebuilding' of Iraq, the vast majority of these contracts going to personal friends or the friends of his vice President.

      Yep, Bush is a real trustworthy sort. I have no doubt whatsoever that Gore would've been equally vile, but all this does is prove that they're *both* scumbags.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    19. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

      It should also be noted that in a parliamentary system, the president's role is extremely limited; it is a mostly ceremonial role. The prime minister has the power.

    20. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by dvk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > This is embarrassing actually. We're not even sure Bush can read without some help sounding-out the big words...

      Al Gore, is that you posting as AC?

      No, what is embarassing is that a trollish childish insult gets modded up. All the qualities of President Bush nonwithstanding (this is not the thread to debate them), comparing him to India's president is among the dumber things you can do - in India, President doesn't hold political power, Prime Minister does. So they can stick anyone there, like a rocket scientist who doesn't need to be a politician. I fail to see any rocket scientists holding the Presidency in the USA in its entire history. Or any scientists, after B.F., for that matter.

      P.S. If you're so fscking smart, how come you're not running for - and winning - the Oval Office?

      P.S. BTW, ability to speak fluently is in no way related to intelligence. Whether Bush is smart or not, as I said, is not on-topic. However, for example, I can't speak much better than him even in my native language, and am probably even worse when speaking English, as I wasn't born here. Despite that, i'm pretty sure whoever that AC I replied to is, I'm lots better than him at math, and probably a lot of other sciences too. (First degree diploma in Russian national Math contest in my HS graduating year, for the doubters, and in top 60 in Putnam contest while being a sophomore in college - AFTER I stopped studying math seriously for 2 years :)

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    21. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by mr.+roboto · · Score: 1

      Try doing that with any two of the languages I just mentioned above.

      Hindi and Urdu are actually very similar. They're written with different scripts, but, in their spoken forms, they're essentially just different dialects of the same language.

    22. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      and has an MBA from Yale

      George W. Bush holds and MBA from Harvard, not Yale.
      He attended Yale as an undergraduate.

      Please do not continue this childish trollfest.

    23. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by tres · · Score: 1


      How does being trained in the military as a pilot equal intelligence?

      Sorry, training != intelligence

      What kind of measure of intelligence is flying a plane from Texas to Washington DC?

      The man hasn't done anything worth mentioning his whole life. He's been riding on daddy's coattails since childhood. If he had been in the jungles of Vietnam (instead of cowardly making someone else take his place), it would say something about the merits of his character. If he had worked hard at Yale and gotten good grades (instead of spending his time drinking and drugging), it would say something about the merits of his character.

      How does muttering a few mispronounced phrases equate bilingual? If the prezitend's understanding of Spanish is what passes for bilingual, I must know about six different languages right now.

      I guess character is why the prezitend is trying to hold back the 9/11 commission's report on his failure to meet the threat he was warned about over and over again by the outgoing Clinton administration. If the schmuck hadn't stolen the election, 9/11 wouldn't have happened at all.

      Instead of ignoring them, go tell the next homeless person you see wandering around that this nation doesn't tolerate the systematic human degradation of people.

      Tell the overwhelming majority of minorities in prison that this nation doesn't tolerate systematic human degradation.

      Sorry, maybe you should go back to Fox News, where everything is great! Amerika is #1.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    24. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The occasional stutter or miswording is far worse than just a polish issue. It indicates a lack of eloquence, and a lack of real mastery of the language. It is critical for a great leader to be eloquent and charismatic. He should be able to move people to action by his mere words. Bush cannot do this, so he must resort to using terrorism to scare people into following his policies.

      Character is far less important than intelligence. The US system of government has many checks against corruption, but few against stupidity. I hear people say, "he may not be that smart, but he is resolute!" Good god! A dumb man who is resolute is just more dangerous than a dumb man who is not. I also hear people say, "he may not be that smart, but he has surrounded himself with smart people!" That's even worse! The American people did not elect those that the President chooses as advisors. A smart man can keep has advisors in check, and use their advice wisely. A dumb man is easily manipulated, or cannot see past his own beliefs to embarce ideas even though he does not agree with them. A good, decent, honest man is someone you befriend, and trust to watch your house while you are away. He is not someone you make president.

      PS> Bush has done far more damage than any of the liberal opposition ever imagined. Check out today's Washington Post. The top two stories are about the White House proving that WMDs actually existed in Iraq, and about how Islamic courts are coming in to replace the government courts in Iraq. So, basically, we went to a war over WMDs that we couldn't find, and now have turned a secular nation into a conservative theocracy. If you don't agree with the last point, consider this: 60% of Iraq is composed of Shiite Muslims. The Shiite branch of Islam is a conservative one. If the US lives up to its promise of allowing the Iraqi's to hold free elections to create their own government, these Shiites will win the elections and form a Islamic theocracy modeled on that of Iran's. The only way the US can prevent this is to stop the democratic process.

      PS2> As for your last paragraph, remember one thing: the US was populated by killing 80 million native American people in less than a century. The US allowed slavery to persist until the 1850's, or half a century after Great Britain declared slavery illegal. It hasn't until a century after that until blacks even started to get real civil rights. Of course, all of this is past us, and they do not negate all the good things the US has done and all the honorable principles on which it was founded. But it sure as hell should keep us very humble when we speak about other nations.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    25. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by elefantstn · · Score: 1
      Dr. Kalam speaks at least four languages (and I am probably understanting it a fair bit - Tamil, Hindi, English, and yes Urdu - he is a _Muslim_. What does that say about tolerance/diversity?) You think speaking Spanish is hard? I have picked up the language in two months, its so similar to English. Try doing that with any two of the languages I just mentioned above.


      Yeah, Spanish is certainly much more similar to English than Urdu is to Hindi. For being such a genius, you're pretty ignorant of the facts of linguistics.
      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    26. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud your effort, but it's useless. The people here will never change, so your options are to ignore them or don't read the comments :(

      However, I do agree with what you're saying.

    27. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      P.S. If you're so fscking smart, how come you're not running for - and winning - the Oval Office?

      You appear to be operating under the misconception that intelligence helps get you elected President. It's not about IQ. It's about charisma. And that's not just me being cynical. Given what the President's job actually is, charisma really is more important than IQ. His job is to be the single point of communication in situations where that's needed - giving speeches and doing diplomacy with other nations. Domestically he has little authority to do much of anything. You should be more concerned with intelligence when electing someone to congress than when electing a president.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    28. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by phliar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      President Bush has a pilot's license and flew F-102 Delta Darts in the Air National Guard---have you ever flown a plane from Texas to Washington DC? (Bush did that once for a date w/ Pres. Nixon's daughter Pat ;)
      What the hell is the big deal with getting a pilot's license? Any idiot can get one -- I know, I have (am!) one. But I didn't get a cushy National Guard pilot job instead of being sent to Vietnam; and I didn't follow that up by deserting from -- er, I mean just not being there -- even that sinecure. (I wish I could have spent thousands of dollars of taxpayers' money to get laid.) As to the rest of your little political rant: come on! Everyone believes he's an idiot, even people who think he has done a good job as president. I don't want a "man of his word" if that only means "not lying about illicit sex on national TV" -- I just want the damn country running better than it has been the last couple of years.

      "As regards India's president [something much worse that they should work on instead]" -- my mom told me to watch out when you hear something like that, it's a ploy to distract. India, like any rational society, should work on all its problems -- different amounts based on resources and importance. I think that assuring India's technological future so that future riches would allow solving other problems is a reasonable stance for him to take. Why not invest in the future too, instead of getting obsessed by the present?

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    29. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or any scientists, after B.F., for that matter.

      *psst* He wasn't president, either.

    30. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      I think your sig says it all.

    31. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. BTW, ability to speak fluently is in no way related to intelligence.

      Having no fingers has nothing to do with intellegence either but it has something to do with playing the piano. Think about it.

    32. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by FroMan · · Score: 1

      When election day comes along I vote. As an individual my vote may not decide the election, but my voice is heard. I may not be able to change the course that my country is heading, but I will give my input.

      There are more than the two options here. A third one is to point out the hypocrisy and fight against it. Perhaps if I stand up against the abuse of moderation it will encourage more to also take heed of how they moderate. Even if it does not, I will still mark those who abuse it and point it out.

      When I metamod I also will mark things I may agree with, but they have been modded interesting when they are funny. Or they may be modded as informative when they have no information in them, but they are interesting to think about.

      So, do your part, make slashdot a better place. Metamod wrong mods. Speak up when people mod wrong. You'll make some enemies, such as someone has gone through and modded 4 of my comments here as offtopic, yet they ignored every other comment in this line that are also offtopic. I don't understand their pettiness. It'd be amusing if you could see who has modded your comments.

      I'd also like to welcome lightcycle to my freaks list today.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    33. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Well, somehow I doubt Bush grew up in a 'mixed language enviroment', as most of us think of it. Unless you count the help, of course.

      I have a hard time making up my mind about Bush. Is he an idiot, or isn't he? I'm leaning towards idiot.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    34. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by sakti · · Score: 1

      P.S. BTW, ability to speak fluently is in no way related to intelligence.

      This is simply not true. There has been shown to be a strong correlation between speach and intelligence. Not a causal relation and not true for in every case, but in most cases true. It perfectly valid to make assumptions about someone's general intelligence based on articulate speech.

      --
      "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees." - Albert Camus
    35. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by VValdo · · Score: 1

      I fail to see any rocket scientists holding the Presidency in the USA in its entire history. Or any scientists, after B.F., for that matter.

      Even assuming that "political science" doesn't count for some reason, you don't have to look too far to find one.

      The most recent scientist U.S. president would probably be Jimmy Carter, who "was educated in the Plains public schools, attended Georgia Southwestern College and the Georgia Institute of Technology, and received a Bachelor of Science degree from the United States Naval Academy in 1946. He later did graduate work in nuclear physics at Union College."

      The president of the United states being a former nuclear engineer was considered a major asset in resolving the Three Mile Island crisis safely.

      P.S. If you're so fscking smart, how come you're not running for - and winning - the Oval Office?

      P.S. BTW, ability to speak fluently is in no way related to intelligence.


      Clearly being smart and an ability to speak fluently is not a prerequisite to running for- and winning- the Oval Office.

      W

      PS: Assuming B.F. stands for Ben Franklin, well, he was never president.

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    36. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, no need to be getting down that hard to our President-elect. Remember, he actually won the majority vote, and the economy was soaring when he was VPOTUS.

    37. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      ...and Gore invented the internet and now we learn was the chief architect of OS X and SCO stole coding from his Unix version called ALIX... Can we not have this repeated again please?

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    38. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indian president can read / write / is fluent in atleast 5 languages. He can speak many more....

    39. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is an idiot. Come on now anyone can learn a language it isn't that hard. He passed Yale with C's. He is helping companies destroy the environment. The bastard doesn't know shit. All he wants is white middle class people to rule the US. And what the hell is his deal with bringing up religion for state purposes. Isn't state supposed to be seperated from government.

      Also what the hell is up with creating new words that have no meaning! Oxymoron should have a picture of Bush next to it!!!

    40. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      It is not funny anymore; and it only was funny because everyone was dead wrong on the whole quote.

    41. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Josh · · Score: 1

      It's true, and Kalam is also a very cool guy. But people should realize that PM and not President is the position of power most parallel to President in the U.S. system. Also, since my in-laws live in India, I order stuff from Indian e-commerce sites fairly often and I can attest from personal experience that finding sites that only work with IE is about 10-20 times more likely for sites based in India compared to ones based in the U.S.

    42. Re:Indian president is a technocrat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      watch out for some buddies out of your house with some broom sticks and rotten tomatoes
      ( looks like you've stayed in good old hyderabad)

  7. Apparently the Shadowbane servers.. by Achoi77 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    .. was not the only thing hacked recently. :)

  8. I saw it coming... by Bull999999 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Even OSS specialists won't be safe from getting laid of by the Indian workers now.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    1. Re:I saw it coming... by supersam · · Score: 1

      yeah. world domination is our aim! :-|

  9. true wisdom. by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mohandas Gandhi once said:
    Non-cooperation with evil is a sacred duty.

    It's obvious Ghandi would of never used Microsoft.

    Mike

    1. Re:true wisdom. by s20451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder what Ghandi would say about the president of India having helped design nuclear missiles?

      I suspect he would have something to say about that before getting his shorts in a knot over Microsoft's EULA.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:true wisdom. by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      design nuclear missiles

      Well India needs to some sort of deterrent against Microsoft.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:true wisdom. by Rande · · Score: 1

      Presumably this was for ensuring the peace of his country.
      Neither the US or anyone else has ever invaded a nuclear capable country.

    4. Re:true wisdom. by haggar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      India's nuclear arsenal came to be as a deterrent against China and Pakistan, both very agressive neighbors which probably wouldn't have hesitated to expand their borders. Expecially China. Now imagine what would have looked like a (conventional) war between such huge countries.

      --
      Sigged!
    5. Re:true wisdom. by jkrise · · Score: 4, Informative

      "what Ghandi would say about the president of India having helped design nuclear missiles?"

      Actually, Gandhi believed in the doctrine of Ahimsa, or non-violence. His brand was a bit different from that of the Jesus "Slap-my-left-cheek-and-I'll-show-you-my-right" brand.

      While advocating tolerance to evil, Gandhi also extolled self-defence and defence-preparedness. To sum up, Gandhi would've approved the design of nuclear misiles, but with a rider - to be employed after all other peaceful avenues (Ahimsa - non-violence, satyagraha - The path of Truth) etc. were exhausted.

      With reference to MS, this could have meant - If MS lives and lets Open Source live - no worries. If they adopt an either-you-or-me attitude, then it's time to act positively and decisively.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    6. Re:true wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably this was for ensuring the peace of his country.

      Yes, and not for example an attempt to esclate an arms war with Pakistan due to the continued conflict over the Kashmir region.

      War is Peace.

    7. Re:true wisdom. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      "Linux? ... Oh, I'm good at free speech, do I get more beer then? ... Ohh, you mean I can write letters, and I don't have to pay a skinny glasses-wearing man? ... Oh, no, he's pastier I am. Well, that's nice, but... missiles!? Who the fuck put this man in charge of my country? Someone needs a very stern talking-to!"

    8. Re:true wisdom. by s20451 · · Score: 1

      They used to say that no two nations that had McDonalds on their territories had ever gone to war. This supposedly meant that McDonalds was an indicator of the sophistication of the middle class, who preferred a consumerist peace to war.

      Of course this changed when NATO bombed Yugoslavia.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    9. Re:true wisdom. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps it was so they could finally stick it to Pakistan. A country of a billion souls does not need to worry about being "invaded" by the U.S., but it does need to worry that it will lose ground in perennial conflicts with its neighbors.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    10. Re:true wisdom. by arvindn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dr. Kalam is a vocal advocate of peace. He maintains, however, that the existence of nukes in the subcontinent is one of the things that contributes to that aim, due to its deterrent value. So there's no contradiction here.

    11. Re:true wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither the US or anyone else has ever invaded a nuclear capable country.

      This is probably why Iran is currently speeding up its own nuclear program, now that they are surrounded by hundred of thousands of US soldiers...

    12. Re:true wisdom. by hughk · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually I would see Pakistan as the greater danger. There are plenty of Pakistanis who are ok but the country hasn't been democratic for more than a few years at a time.

      A combination of a military and religious extremisim in an undemocratic country is not exactly consucive to peace. China is less of a danger now that at least some eonomic reforms have taken place, which give a form of democracy.

      India isn't a particularly agressive country and apart from the expense (when so many remain so poor), I don't have any problems with them being armed, particularly with Pakistan next door.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    13. Re:true wisdom. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or more precisely, on Dr Kalam leading the team which made the nuke bomb.:-)

      Two different perspectives on this. Larry Collins and Dominic Lapierre, in their extremely readable book, Freedom at Midnight, had suggested that India's testing of the bomb in 1970's was the final break from Mahatma Gandhi's path of non-violence and ahimsa. Raj Chengappa, in a much later book on Pokhran II, Weapons of Peace, asked the same question to the nuclear team, which, of course, consisted of Dr Kalam. The team apparently had their conscience clear; they were developing nuclear weapons not to increase India's fighting ability, but to increase its deterrent ability. We had, to be sure, "not seeked territory in a thousand years" (or something like that; quoting the words from memory), and that, therefore, Gandhiji would have approved.

      I'm sure the team meant well, and personally, I've always admired Dr Kalam and the other team leader, Dr Chidambaram, but with all due respects, the deterrent ability of India's nukes (and indeed our missiles) have long been answered on the snow-capped peaks of Kargil. They are not going to stop terrorists from killing Indian nationals or attacking Indian installations, establishments and everything we hold dear. Not just that, we must also note that large-scale industries are not discouraged, alchohol is not prohibitted (or even if it was, the prohibition has been lifted), or village-level self-governance is not encouraged.

      I don't know if Gandhiji would have approved, but let's at least be honest here:- India has left Gandhi a long time back, during the days of our first PM, Nehru itself, when we had established factories, dams and other large scale industries that Gandhiji detested so much.

    14. Re:true wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your english sucks dude


    15. Re:true wisdom. by AtrN · · Score: 1

      Dangerous game. Do you know how many nukes there are in Wa? And those Tridents aren't that far from Bill's place (if he beefs up the canal).

    16. Re:true wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would of => would HAVE!!! argh, how can people get this wrong?

    17. Re:true wisdom. by spun · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing out the true meaning of Ahimsa. Too many people hear "pacifist" or "Non-violence" and they think "stupid weakling." Nothing could be further from the truth.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    18. Re:true wisdom. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Actually, Gandhi believed in the doctrine of Ahimsa, or non-violence. His brand was a bit different from that of the Jesus "Slap-my-left-cheek-and-I'll-show-you-my-right" brand.

      Actually no. The right-cheek-to-my-slapped-left doctrine is very much Gandhian; that's the philosophy behind satyagraha. Someone does someething wrong to you; you fight back by attacking the guy's conscience.

    19. Re:true wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sirs, he was actually a Gandhi not a Ghandi
      (let's just hope he wouldn't mind that)

    20. Re:true wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, where's the pleasure in that? If a person pops a sweet into their mouth, they don't expect to get their cheecks pierced!

    21. Re:true wisdom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Milton: We use only the finest baby frogs, dew picked and flown from Iraq, cleansed in finest quality spring water, lightly killed, and then sealed in a succulent Swiss quintuple smooth treble cream milk chocolate envelope and lovingly frosted with glucose.

      Praline: That's as maybe, it's still a frog.

      Milton: What else?

      Praline: Well don't you even take the bones out?

      Milton: If we took the bones out it wouldn't be crunchy would it?

      Praline: Superintendent Parrot ate one of those.

      Parrot: Excuse me a moment. (exits hurriedly)

      Milton: It says 'crunchy frog' quite clearly.

      Praline: Well, the superintendent thought it was an almond whirl. People won't expect there to be a frog in there. They're bound to think it's some form of mock frog.

      Milton: (insulted) Mock frog? We use no artificial preservatives or additives of any kind!

      Praline: Nevertheless, I must warn you that in future you should delete the words 'crunchy frog', and replace them with the legend 'crunchy raw unboned real dead frog', if you want to avoid prosecution.

  10. Where Are the Asian Indians WIth JBoss? by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    I can't help but notice the rather unusual character of JBoss team (the premiere open source Java server). Is the disconnect due to money problems forcing Asian Indians to work for money? If so, then why the absence of Asian Indians in the Top Coders where the top guys are making enough money in prizes to live in the US or Europe?

    1. Re:Where Are the Asian Indians WIth JBoss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... why don't you just call them 'Indians', as that is what they are?

    2. Re:Where Are the Asian Indians WIth JBoss? by Baldrson · · Score: 1

      New World terminology that has now been enshrined and institutionalized. We have a lot of "Indians" here that have never seen India -- they're called American Indians due to Columbus's erroneous identification of the New World as India. This is enshrined and insitutionalized in governmental terminology such as "Bureau of Indian Affairs" etc. having nothing to do with India.

  11. Re:Great - chicken Tikka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://rutherfurd.net/cookbook/Meat_and_Fish/Chick en_Tikka.html :-)

  12. It is I2IT not IIT! by yodha · · Score: 5, Informative

    The President made the speech at the new International Institute Of Information Technology (I2IT) not at IIT.

    1. Re:It is I2IT not IIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to type in the same thing. The IITs were considered to be the equivalent of MIT, Stanford etc...

    2. Re:It is I2IT not IIT! by imadork · · Score: 1

      Question from an ignorant American:

      Why is it I2IT and not I3T?

      Just curious....

    3. Re:It is I2IT not IIT! by yodha · · Score: 1

      The 2 is a superscript, hence it is IsquareIT.
      Probably they want to mean "square of IT" or want to draw an analogy to e=mc2

    4. Re:It is I2IT not IIT! by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, it should really be:

      pow(sqrt(-1),3) * T

      We can ofcourse assume T as the variable in this function. We could even shorten this to simpley looking at:

      -1 * sqrt(-1) * T

      We can do this by assuming I^3 is the same as -I.

      You see what you proposed of:

      I2IT

      would really come out to:
      (sqrt(-1) * 2) * (sqrt(-1) * T)

      Which we all know would truly be:

      -1 + (sqrt(-1) * T) + (2 * sqrt(-1)) + (2 * T)

      This is obviously wrong:

      -1 + (sqrt(-1) * T) + (2 * sqrt(-1)) + (2 * T) != -1 * sqrt(-1) * T

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    5. Re:It is I2IT not IIT! by imadork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but why not IcubedT?
      I guess the E=mc2 analogy is a good as any other explanation...

    6. Re:It is I2IT not IIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes about as much sense as ID4 for Independance Day.

    7. Re:It is I2IT not IIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no sir.
      it is because we had already got 3-I T registered.
      i mean triple-I T, Hyderabad.

  13. Oh? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    "If so, the fight is already over."

    Why?

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Oh? by Sp4c3+C4d3t · · Score: 1

      We all know how MS works... they continually lock us in as time passes. In that amount of time, there will simply be no going back if you're already using MS software.

      --
      Happy New Year, it's 1984!
  14. Re:The outsourced future of Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    riiiight.

  15. Security in OSS, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, OSS software has a great reputation about its security ;) But, people still get fed with the OSS anti-Microsoft FUD...

  16. What should be noted... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Insightful


    What should be noted about him is that he is not a politician, but a scientist and an independent thinker foremost.

    Everyone thinks they are independent thinkers. Someone else is an independent thinker if you agree with him, otherwise he's just being difficult.

    1. Re:What should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not.

    2. Re: What should be noted... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Everyone thinks they are independent thinkers. Someone else is an independent thinker if you agree with him, otherwise he's just being difficult.

      You're just being difficult.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:What should be noted... by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Someone else is an independent thinker if you agree with him
      Gotta disagree. Someone else is an independent thinker if you disagree with him and you still must respect his opinion.

    4. Re:What should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else is an independent thinker if you disagree with him and you still must respect his opinion.

      That's not any better. How does someone's respect or lack of respect influence another's ability to think? I think your opinion is stupid, so will you agree that you are not a free thinker?

  17. A few corrections in the story.. by heytal · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I am from pune, the origin of this story :-)

    The speech was not made at IIT (Indian Institute of Technology) as claimed in the story. It was made at IIIT (Indian Institute of Information Technology) a new college on IT.

    1. Re:A few corrections in the story.. by heytal · · Score: 1

      Oops.. the first I in IIIT is not for Indian, but for International. sorry. The correction still remains valid.

    2. Re:A few corrections in the story.. by rsidd · · Score: 1

      According to the link, it was made at the I2IT (international institute of information technology). I've never heard of it but perhaps that's why it's the dedication speech.

    3. Re:A few corrections in the story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ???????
      perhaps you don't understand logic

      maybe you meant to say, the mistake still remains a mistake?

  18. Re:Problems? by jamie · · Score: 1, Informative
    Yeah. Stuff was broken. Now it's fixed (we believe). We're working on a more permanent and better fix.

    It happens :/

  19. Not the same situation. by StarKruzr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    India is a growing market, not an already established one. Microsoft is no more "entrenched" there than OSS software is. They could go either way at this point, and if the government (which has lots of nice, fat contracts to hand out to developers) is strongly in favor of OSS, that turns the tide pretty strongly in favor of the Open Source camp.

    --

    +++ATH0
  20. Correction! by arvindn · · Score: 3, Informative
    To be noted is that he made the speech (look for the "Think Different" section) at the famous Indian Institute of Information Technology (india's foremost academic institution equivalent to MIT). .

    There are two things wrong with that: first, you got the name wrong: he made the speech at the "International Institute of Information Technology". Second, you're probably confusing it with IIT, Indian Institute of Technology, which is the one that fits the description of India's foremost academic institution. Two unrelated universities.

  21. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by thelexx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Euro/dollar activity has little to do with peoples general feelings toward America and much more to do with the fact that Fed Governor Bernanke said, paraphrasing, "we have this thing called a printing press, and we aren't afraid to use it", combined with Alan G saying that we don't have enough inflation.

    --
    "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  22. end-to-end solutions by flokemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He added that India should emerge not only as a software industry but as an "ICT (Information and communication technology) industry" with equal strengths in software, hardware, embedded systems design, integration and total end-to-end solutions.

    I think India is to be reckoned with in the future. Take the pharmaceutical industry at the moment, India has big companies manufacturing generic medicines.
    That story actually reminded of that: give them the source/ingredients and they will try to make it, but cheaper. Obviously they can't make free software any cheaper, but if they try to make it a complete solution, then why couldn't they have a chance of succeeding?
    The major problem they are facing at the moment imho is probably a lack of qualified IT people, but give them time, and they will surely be there.

    1. Re:end-to-end solutions by sirdude · · Score: 1

      "The major problem they are facing at the moment imho is probably a lack of qualified IT people, but give them time, and they will surely be there"

      You mean that all the qualified indians are in America? ;P

    2. Re:end-to-end solutions by xzap · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      why dont you come out of your shithole cellar once in a while? or atleast watch the Discovery channel if you want to comment on other countries. Ignorant piece of shit.

    3. Re:end-to-end solutions by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That's actually more true than you realize. Developing nations, suffer very much from the problem of brain drain. Many educated and wealthy people leave the country because of prevailing conditions. India is much more stable than most other developing nations, but they still have to deal with this issue.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:end-to-end solutions by axxackall · · Score: 1
      The major problem they are facing at the moment imho is probably a lack of qualified IT people, but give them time, and they will surely be there.

      Sure qualified IT people have already been there, but in a past decade they have migrated to USA through H1B. Sure, now INS doesn't approve so many visa as those days, so give them some time just to reproduce themselves :)

      --

      Less is more !
    5. Re:end-to-end solutions by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "I think India is to be reckoned with in the future. Take the pharmaceutical industry at the moment, India has big companies manufacturing generic medicines. That story actually reminded of that: give them the source/ingredients and they will try to make it, but cheaper. Obviously they can't make free software any cheaper, but if they try to make it a complete solution, then why couldn't they have a chance of succeeding? The major problem they are facing at the moment imho is probably a lack of qualified IT people, but give them time, and they will surely be there."

      That's it.....we need to "liberate" those "terrorists" NOW! Before they um....."steal" from the poor poor CEO's of America by producing something for cheaper and undercutting American Corporations. Someone get FOX on the phone.......there's a new "War on Terror" at hand!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  23. It makes sense by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It makes sense, since the President of India is a top-level scientist (I believe he headed India's nuclear programme) and not a clueless buffoon.

    Note for the humour impaired: this is a joke

    1. Re:It makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes sense, since the President of India is a top-level scientist (I believe he headed India's nuclear programme) and not a clueless buffoon.
      Note for the humour impaired: this is a joke


      It's funny because its true.

  24. Bit Slanted.... by moehoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find the subjective statement that "he is not a politician" to be exceptionally slanted. Clearly, the submitter has alterior motives. It has a certain Clintonian ring to it that suggests that the submitter is the guy's campaign manager.

    Any guesses as to what these motives are? How could you say that the leader of the largest democracy in the world is not a politician, first and foremost?

    I think the slashdot editors should have stripped that subjective statement from the story. Just because a guy advocates OSS doesn't put him on some new plane of existance.

    Anyway, hooray for gov't backed OSS. I'm sure if Bush came out and made the same speech, he'd be crucified on slashdot in some strange way.

    30% offtopic, 40% troll, 30% flamebait, 5% funny, 5% love

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Bit Slanted.... by rulethirty · · Score: 1

      The "submitter" is obviously a proponent of OSS dumbass, hence OSS is their "alterior motive." Subjective statements are what slashdot is all about! (they aren't a scientific journal for crying out loud!) It does put the Indian president on a new plane of existance, the one most of us identify with!

    2. Re:Bit Slanted.... by heytal · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Indian President, unlike the American president, is a ceremonial head of the state. All the powers lie in the hands of the Prime Minister (currently Atal Bihari Vajpayee). The president of India need not be a politician, and is not elected by the large electorate. The lawmakers elect the president.

      The Indian President, APJ Abdul Kalam, has received the highest civilian award in India, Bharat Ratna, before he was elected President. He is a nuclear Scientist, who headed India's defense laboratories.

    3. Re:Bit Slanted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Leader of the largest democracy" = Prime Minister. President is just a figurehead we have..

    4. Re:Bit Slanted.... by umrgregg · · Score: 1

      New to Slashdot?

      --
      NMG
    5. Re:Bit Slanted.... by Xabraxas · · Score: 0
      I hate to gripe about this but it's not very useful to create a hypothetical that is highly unlikely/impossible. When people say things like:

      "Anyway, hooray for gov't backed OSS. I'm sure if Bush came out and made the same speech, he'd be crucified on slashdot in some strange way."

      It makes sick. I would be grateful. I don't hate Bush because he's a republican or whatever, I hate his policies. I wouldn't hate him for doing something good but unfortunately, in my humble opinion, he has done nothing good.

      Anyway. The point being, you only lose credibility when you say something so blatantly rediculous. Not everyone just votes for their "team", some of us actually have well-formed opinions and grievances.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    6. Re:Bit Slanted.... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the submitter was trying to hint at he fact that Dr APJ Abdul Kalam isn't a career politician, but was in fact, largely responsible for India's missile, space and nuclear programmes (Pokhran II that is).

      He was elected virtually unopposed, with token opposition from a Communist Party nominee, so if the submitter was indeed Dr Kalam's campaign manager, he probably had one of the easiest jobs in the world. :-)

      Any case, this isn't quite governmental approval for OSS/Software-Libre; it's more like Dr Kalam's nod to his scientist/engineer colleagues in a presumably OSS-friendly campus. Someone in the Parliament did ask the Indian Minister of Information Technology if he would mandate the exclusive use of OSS in government departments; the Minister apparently went on record saying that the IT procurement policy will depend on the task at hand, and not how the technology has been developed.

      (Which, of course, is a fair statement to make, and personally, I'm glad that the government thinks that way; shows that there's at least some semblance of a clue at Raisana Hill. For, most believe we lost the hardware game precisely because of such closed-minded policies; in 1977, the then socialist government drove the international electronics players out, giving the entire Indian market to four or five government-run electronics companies. Reason:- the powers-that-be didn't like phoreners operating freely in India.

      OSS *should* win; but solely on technological merit. Not for ideological reasons)

    7. Re:Bit Slanted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The president is a bit like the British Queen, but remember when Slashdot found out that she was running RedHat?

    8. Re:Bit Slanted.... by aron_wallaker · · Score: 1

      I love it when someone can come out with cracks like

      It has a certain Clintonian ring to it that suggests that the submitter is the guy's campaign manager.

      and

      I'm sure if Bush came out and made the same speech, he'd be crucified on slashdot in some strange way.

      ...and at the same time accuse other people of being biased. Helloooooo kettle, this is the pot calling!

    9. Re:Bit Slanted.... by pork_spies · · Score: 1

      How could you say that the leader of the largest democracy in the world is not a politician, first and foremost?

      Because he's not the leader? He's the President. The "leader" is the Prime Minister.

  25. Okay, It's time for another tech boom by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    India is really making gains in the IT world. They are also a rapidly expanding and potentially quite vast market. If a company can get enough of a foothold in India, we may see someone other than MS dominate there.

    1 000 000 000 million people worldwide using an Os that isn't Windows..... Now, that would clobber Microsoft's world domination plans.

    On a side note, anyone know how I can invest in India's IT stocks?

    1. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by rg117 · · Score: 1

      Yea
      All the big India IT companies are listed on the NASDAQ

    2. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

      1 000 000 000 million people worldwide using an Os that isn't Windows

      Fuck I better start impregnating women like crazy if we are going to hit those numbers, but if thats what it takes to beat MS I am prepared to suffer and do it. Girls please form an orderly queue outside my door. Preferably supermodels/fit actresses types to the front.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by codekavi · · Score: 1

      Infosys ,
      Wipro ,
      Satyam and
      Rediff trade on Nasdaq/NSE.

    4. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by arvindn · · Score: 1
      While OSS is strong in India's enterprise sector, that's not the case on the desktop. So "1 000 000 000 million [sic]* people worldwide using an Os that isn't Windows" is still a pipe dream.

      * While it's a really populous country, I don't think there's space for 10^15 people :-)

    5. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by rg117 · · Score: 1

      That's because no one pays for their software. I haven't met a single person in india that actually has non pirated software.

    6. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only pay that which you can afford. Win XP in India costs Rs.6000 which is a lot of money (for the average person its about half his salary). In US its about 200$ which is less that 1/10th the average salary.
      Also givenRs.6000 I bet you can live with it for a month easily.
      Also buying a computer is like buying a motorcycle. It costs the same anyway ;-).
      So the bottomline is anything manufactured in the US will probably be too costly in India which would put most people off from buying it.

    7. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by Malc · · Score: 1

      Ha: now you're regretting US immigration policy. What a bad idea it was to send those US trained H1b's back to India when their six years were up.

    8. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bad idea it was to send those US trained H1b's back to India when their six years were up.

      I thought they had to be trained BEFORE they were hired; after all the point of H1B is to hire highly skilled people for positions where an American worker can't be found.

      If the Indians aren't trained before they're hired, then an unskilled American should have been hired and trained... right?

      Oh, I'm sorry, I'd forgotten that the real point of the H1B program is to drive down wages in the U.S. so that companies don't even have to bother moving outside the U.S. to get cheaper labor.

    9. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by rg117 · · Score: 1

      I know man, I'm not complaining I'm just pointing out. What I'm saying is that even though most of the desktops in India are MS Win, MS isn't actually collecting much royalty from them, which in my opinion is a good thing

    10. Re:Okay, It's time for another tech boom by Malc · · Score: 1

      As anybody who has done a degree and then worked for a few years knows, the real training that is important to businesses starts after graduation. By the time somebody has worked for six years, their experience is worth more to a business than their degree.

  26. True wisdom, bad grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obvious Ghandi would of never used Microsoft.

    Er... that would be "would have" or "would've".

  27. Re:Problems? by richie2000 · · Score: 1

    Nevermind, I found them. Fair enough, I guess.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  28. Great work Mr President by subzero_ice · · Score: 1

    What many people don't realize is that newly developing countries have an advantage and that is they can learn from the experiences of other developed countries. So incase of India the president has seen that two heads are better than one and when you let people use their free will the outcome is certainly better. In short Linux is better than windows because people customize it according to their needs unlike windows, which wants its customers customized.

  29. Cool prez by yodha · · Score: 1

    It is cool having a president who is a nuclear scientist :-)

    1. Re:Cool prez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a club GWB would want to/can join..

      Bill Clinton - stepfather abused him, his mom told him to study hard and he'll one day be president, so he did, even getting a scholarship to go to Oxford, a self made President, articulate in his speeches.

      Nelson Mandela - spent 20 years in jail for his beliefs and came out a hero for his folk.

      President of India - a rocket scientist.

      George W. Bush? Daddy's little boy who smoked weed through college and can't even construct a sentence properly. How did Americans vote this guy into Office? Oh wait, he didn't, he cheated his way into it.

    2. Re:Cool prez by schon · · Score: 1

      It is cool having a president who is a nuclear scientist :-)

      <simpsonsvoice character="homer">
      Nucular, honey. It's pronounced nucular.
      </simpsonsvoice>

  30. This is what he said.. by heytal · · Score: 4, Informative

    The most unfortunate thing is that India still seems to believe in proprietary solutions. Further spread of IT which is influencing the daily life of individuals would have a devastating effect on the lives of society due to any small shift in the business practice involving these proprietory solutions. It is precisely for these reasons open source software need to be built which would be cost effective for the entire society. In India, open source code software will have to come and stay in a big way for the benefit of our billion people.

    1. Re:This is what he said.. by michael_cain · · Score: 1

      If this is so, why aren't there Indian products in the market competing with major software applications? Since there seem to be a large set of skilled developers available, why isn't there an Indian equivalent of Office at half the price? Where are the Indian database products? Software development tools? It should be possible to produce and sell such products at a fraction of the price charged by US software companies -- look at Microsoft's most recent annual report and check out the profit margins on Office, for example.

      Or do those products exist but are just not marketed in the US?

  31. Pebbles by brettlbecker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The leader of the world's most populous democratic (as far as that term goes, anyway) nation advocates the development (and thus the use) of open-source software. Completely excellent.

    With this announcement following the Munich decision, it will be interesting to see if any further cities/states begin to take a closer look at open-source alternatives. If these increasingly influential parties have some success with this decision, then I would think that this could be quite the spur to others who are getting fed up with being strangluated by the ever-more restrictive licensing and lowest-common-denominator quality of many proprietary products.

    Are we perhaps watching the pebble begin to roll?

    B

    --
    "We must still have chaos within in order to be able to give birth to a dancing star." --Friedrich Nietzsche
    1. Re:Pebbles by jcdr · · Score: 1

      More than that, I feel that any cities/states talking about new deal with Microsoft will automaticly be suspect of corruption or at least getting so low price that it might become not profitable for Microsoft.

  32. Optimistic by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He may not be a pure politician but theres a lot of political optimism in the numbers he's looking for regarding growth. Indian IT will not keep growing the at the rate it is now for much longer, I'n not saying it wont grow, just not at the rate they are projecting. It strikes me as very naive and shortsighted for a leader to put so many economic eggs in one basket by baking on IT to prop up the economy. Its not oil or Gold, customers can get it somewhere else.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Optimistic by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      A fair point, but then it's quite possible that the reason he stressed on IT is because he delivered the speech in an IT-focussed university.

      His book India 2020; a Vision for the New Millennium, on the other hand, apparently has focussed on "Food & Agriculture to High Tech areas including Strategic Industries, Enabling Infrastructure suggestions viability of inter-linkages between various sectors", to quote an Amazon reviewer. Haven't read the book myself, just ordered it from my university library!

  33. Using him as an example by truthsearch · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'm always looking for examples to present to my boss to switch to OSS. My company is mostly in the US. Unfortunately even the recommendation of a country's president isn't enough to persuade them to even look at OSS. While I see lots of news of other countries actively switching to Microsoft's alternatives, the change is still extremely slow in the US. I think even when the rest of the world is mostly on OSS the US will be the most stubborn in letting it become the majority. But it'll take world pressure (the global market) to get a truely major shift to OSS in the US.

    Now if President Bush recommended OSS in a speech in the US it would only solidify Microsoft's dominance.

  34. equivalent to MIT? by asv108 · · Score: 1
    famous Indian Institute of Information Technology (india's foremost academic institution equivalent to MIT)

    Not that I care to defend MIT, but how is this university equivalent to MIT? I saw the 60 minutes by Leslie "kiss ass" Stahl a few months ago. They way they measured its competitiveness is by the acceptance rate of an exam that high school students take, which any student can take in hopes of passing. I'm sure its a fantastic university, but there is no way it can have the quality of applicants seen at an MIT or Caltech, where high achieving students from all around the world make up a significant percentage of the applicant pool and where slackers like me or even excellent students don't even bother applying unless they have a stellar academic record.

    If the US administered a test that anyone could take to see if they could get in to MIT, Caltech, etc, then a comparison might be fair based on acceptance rates.

    1. Re:equivalent to MIT? by snapperOrgans · · Score: 1

      My assumption is that they mean "equivalent in concept" rather than "equivalent in stature"

    2. Re:equivalent to MIT? by m.o · · Score: 1

      India has a billion people. IIT accepts maybe 10,000 student per year (I'm making this up). So, less than .05% of that billion has studied at IIT. Just think about the numbers --- IIT has the top .05% of the distrubution! And they don't care about "diversity" or "legacy" or "money" --- they just rank order everyone and take the best.

      And another difference is that while in the US you have places like Ivy league, etc. where many smart kids go, in India IIT is clearly the most prestigious. Hence, I wouldn't be surprised if the average IIT student was in fact better than the average MIT student. Actually, I have worked with both IIT and MIT alumni, and they were all brilliant, so making comparisons is hard.

    3. Re:equivalent to MIT? by rg117 · · Score: 1

      You are very wrong, the quality of IIT applicants is on par or even better than MIT applicants. Obviously in your world since they aren't American they automatically disqualify from being any good.
      If I was you, I wouldn't bother applying at IIT either.


      Speech by US ambassador to India at a IIT alumni meet



      Bill Gates inaugurates IIT golden jubilee celebrations

    4. Re:equivalent to MIT? by asparagus · · Score: 1

      A lot of people forget that if you're one in a million, there's a thousand people just like you in both China and India.

    5. Re:equivalent to MIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The catch is that the IIT entrance exams are one of the toughest exams. Students need to pass advanced math, physics and chemistry tests. Now, to get a feel for what we are talking about, note that quantum mechanics is introduced to students in Indian schools at the high school level.

    6. Re:equivalent to MIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Umm, I am sorry but you miss the point here completely.

      Those *EXAMS* are really hard. It isn't easy for students to study for 2+ years before taking them. Your MIT equivalent: GPA (depends from school to school) and SAT (bahhh, so laughably coachable) are relatively easy. And, really, does extra curricular activities symbolize intelligence? Letters or recommendations are all about favortism. So, well, there it is: MIT's admission standards are no rocket launch.

      Any generic high school student isn't going to pass the exams. Admission standards at MIT are mighty low compared to IIT. IIT accepts less than 2000 students a year out of around 200,000-250,000 test takers. Thats below 1% (and this is for undergrads). Last time I checked even MIT's grad programs in their best areas have an acceptance rate of around 3 to 5%.

      Also, US has many other great undergrad institutions, India doesn't. I will go out on a limb and say that IIT has a better undergrad population then MIT. Anyway, over 95% of IITers end up in US. They are braniacs and ambitious, they might not have the advantages of a first world education and the tools that come along with it, but when they come here they are second to none.

    7. Re:equivalent to MIT? by achilles8 · · Score: 1

      I would agree that the average person who gets into an IIT is better than the average MIT entrant. I present myself as case in point, I studied pretty hard for the IIT entrance (no social life for a whole year!) and couldnt get in. The same year I took the SAT's to apply to US universities and got 1580 in them (780 verbal, 800 math; 99 percentile in both). And my preparation for the SAT's comprised doing two or three tests from Barrons and nothing else..

    8. Re:equivalent to MIT? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      The submitter bungled. It's not.

      Dr Kalam delivered the speech at the institute's first convocation of the International Institute of Information Technology, Pune, one among the other recently established IIIT's around India (Hyderabad, Allahabad, Gwalior and Bangalore on last count). The programme you saw was probably for the Indian Institute of Technology's, a few of which are celebrating their golden jubilee or something.

      In any case, as any ex-high-schooler-in-India would point out, IIIT(Hyderabad, Allahabad) have a higher competitive rate than the IIT's; the ratio in my year was 1:100 for the IIT's, while it was 1:2,500 for the IIIT's. :-)

    9. Re:equivalent to MIT? by caesar79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would argue that the entrant to any of the IIT's is TECHNICALLY much more qualified than 99% of the entrants I've seen in the US. To get into the IIT's, you need to clear what is known as the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE). The examination is conducted all over India. An estimated 250000 students take the exam yearly with about an estimated 2500 getting through to the 6 campuses of IIT's. The entrance exam is grilling. It encompasses three 3-hr exams in maths, physics and chemistry. The syllabus of these exams is roughly equivalent to that of a 3-year bachelor course in science (BSc). So its like you need to be about 3 years ahead of your grade to get through. With the increasing number of applicants, the exam has been made into a two stage exam - a three hr screening multiple choice exam followed by the aforementioned three 3-hr exams. You have to clear both!! Typically students start preparing for the JEE exams atleast 2 years before they give it. School work is neglected as the syllabus for the JEE is way more advanced than the normal school. The JEE is not a joke. It is one of the toughest exams to get through. Take this as an example - two senior year students came up witha polynomial time algorithm for Primality testing.

    10. Re:equivalent to MIT? by agni · · Score: 1

      While the article wasn't mentioning IIT, let me say that I wasn't even in the top 100 of the IIT rankers but I graduated with honors from Caltech recently. While I chose to come to the States hoping to have a more diverse experience, I have many friends who went through the IITs who could very well make it to MIT or Caltech and do exceedingly well here.
      The SATs and the essays that schools here measure applicants by are no true measure of a student's performance, just as the IIT JEEs aren't. Also do keep in mind how much money a school like Caltech spends per undergraduate student and contrast it with the IITians. The fact that so many IIT alums are here and kicking butt at Caltech as PhDs is another facet of the rigorous preparation students get at the IITs.
      While I moved from one university to another (ending up at Caltech where, I will not say here whether I finally did find that balance I was looking for) I had the opportunity to see the many disadvantages and advantages each system has over the other. I have to say that the education at Caltech/MIT and IITs is comparable. Students from the IITs probably will kick our butts in theoretical stuff, and maybe we can kick theirs at applied... and so forth. Personally I am glad I came, but I will always regret not having the capacity to lead a dual life where I needn't have missed out on the IIT experience as well.

    11. Re:equivalent to MIT? by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would imagine that the quality of the applicants to IIT would be a lot better than those to MIT.

      American education is really lame. Schools in India, China, Taiwan should be much better. I'm sure it might be harder for international students to get in American colleges, but I think every international student they reject is more well qualified than most of the american students they accept.

      I was originally from Taiwan but I am an undergrad at Berkeley studying EECS and the quality of the students here are no where near even those of the worst schools in Taiwan. My friend from Taiwan has straight A+s. and I wasn't a good student in Taiwan. That is from someone who's studying in a foreign language.

      I dont know about India, but high school studnets in Taiwan start school at 7 am, get off at 5 pm, and then go to cram school from 6-9pm. I think high schoolers in the US should wake up to how much they slack off. Education in the US is really pitiful. The reason American universities have a good reputation is probably due to the large amount of international grad students who contribute to the research. They come here because US colleges are famous. That's really sad. We should all just stay home.

      I regret coming to the US and paying so much money for an inferior education.

    12. Re:equivalent to MIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That high school life sounds like hell. Why waste your time like that?

    13. Re:equivalent to MIT? by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

      it produces more technically qualified engineers

    14. Re:equivalent to MIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there is something to be said for allowing high school students to have a life. Fortunately, there are more school systems in the world. Between the extremes found in the US (depending on your schools district, expect *anything*), and Taiwan (China, Japan, &c.), one finds European schools that tend to have a tracked system and rigorous national or regional examinations and/or standards which advance the higher-level students about one year into a decent American college (but not Caltech or MIT), but nonetheless allow them to develop themselves socially and emotionally as well.

      I braindrained away from Holland because the universities have their drawbacks, but our secondary education (and that in most neighbouring countries) sure has an edge over both the keep-em-off-the-streets US schools and the get-your-BS-before-you-start-it Asian ones.

    15. Re:equivalent to MIT? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      ...but are technical qualifications all it takes to be a good engineer?

      The really top-notch engineers I've worked with have been not folks who are entirely devoted to their craft -- though to a one they love it -- but they have hobbies and side lines as well (also being musicians, mechanics, or what have you), and are frequently witty, social individuals as well. Having an immense amount of book knowledge is no doubt an exceedingly useful thing, but I wonder if it the educational programs you mention might -- through the single-mindedness they require and encourage -- detract from the development of those artistic and social aspects many great engineers seem to share.

  35. Re:a new predication for armed conflict? by RonenKauffman · · Score: 1

    i resent the flamebait tag. this is a real opinion, shared by many people worldwide and especially in western countries where lobbyists have more power than voters, by a LONG shot. and if M$ isn 't one of the biggest lobbyists in DC I will eat my hat

    --

    ----------------------
    RKauffman s.e.c.r.e.t.m.e.d.i.a.g.r.o.u.p
  36. makes sense by ramzak2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For a country like india to invest in open source. They have the IT manpower, a huge indegenous market with enough demand to absorb anything that is created even if they dont prove successful oversees where microsoft is already a dominant player. I dont know what Gates discussed with the President of India about security, it sure dint go too well.

    Also, it should be noted that the president of india is not directly elected by the people unlike united states & does not carry that much of a power. I would like to hear something like this from the prime minister of India - which will not happen because industry lobbyists are effective where there is a need for money to run in elections.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:makes sense by pamri · · Score: 1

      While the president of India does not have much political power, his opinions atleast among the politicians do make an impact. The current president, Abdul Kalam, by virtue of his being a scientist & a former scientific adviser to the Prime Minister does carry a lot of weight. And one more thing to remember is, having the President of India advocate open source software carries a lot of weight and is a great reference for people(including yours truly) who are pushing for OSS/FS in the Indian Govt., against a sceptic & unwilling to change beaurocracy. Slightly OT, will these incidents combined with countries favouring OSS/FS over s/w developed by American Cos.,(mostly, i a may be wrong) lead to the US adopting OSS/FS more widely & more rapidly.

    2. Re:makes sense by jfmiller · · Score: 1

      This is stupid and off topic but,

      The president of the U.S. is not directly elected either. The eletoral college is responcible for that, and the way it's set up at the moment, effectivally prevents third party canadits.

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
  37. IIT, IIIT and I2IT by rmathew · · Score: 4, Informative
    To be noted is that he made the speech (look for the "Think Different" section) at the famous Indian Institute of Information Technology (India's foremost academic institution equivalent to MIT).

    RTFA!

    He made the speech at the International Institute of Information Technology (I2IT) not at an Indian Institute of Information Technology (IIIT).

    By no stretch of the imagination are any of these India's foremost academic institutions. The submitter perhaps meant one of the Indian Institute of Technologies (IIT) here...

  38. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by shivianzealot · · Score: 1

    The world is really ganging up against Microsoft simply because they're American I think (or perhaps they just act "American"

    Sounds like motivation to at least be seen as behaving.

    Unfavorable action = unfavorable consequence. Really, this isn't a bad thing; though can't be good for open source here, in the states, when its phrased that way.

    --

    Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

  39. Re:Problems? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm sure we'll be seeing some sort of story explaining what's going on w/the changes on the front page

    It looks like they've been testing a few things as of late.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  40. I don't trust India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll


    Expose on Indian fascism. They may not be Muslim fanatics, but they are religious fanatics.

    India should abandon nuclear weapons and ICBMs.
    India should stop tolerating pograms against minorities.
    India should address their grievous repression
    of "lower castes".
    India should allow a referendum in Kashmir,
    as specified by the UN.

    Maybe if they addressed these, we could take
    Indian policy seriously.

    1. Re:I don't trust India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Mr. Ballmer.... why didn't you just use your real name? Or, does "steveball" give you away??

    2. Re:I don't trust India. by chenGOD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Replace India with America, and Kashmir with Iraq.

    3. Re:I don't trust India. by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      wow, couldnt have said it better :)

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    4. Re:I don't trust India. by sirdude · · Score: 1
      • America should abandon nuclear weapons and ICBMs.
      • America should stop implementing programs against minorities.
      • America should address their grievous repression of everyone non-american.
      • America should allow a referendum in Iraq.
      • America should give the UN control in Iraq.
      • America should provide proof of WMDs.
      • America should provide the supposedly cliching evidence of the presence of WMD in iraq before the war.
      • America should not favour american companies for rebuilding Iraq.
      • American should not use spy satellites.
      • America should not elect simians for the post of El Presidente.
      • America should stop monitoring packet data on the internet (echelon etc.)...
      • America should stop it's bishops and priests from molesting it's children...
      • America should stop it's kids from killing each other in school...
      • America should stop playing baseball as it's tediously biring. They should all switch to Cricket

      Now tell me... wtf does the political or religious orientation of India have to do with it's possible adoption of OSS?
      I sometimes wonder where tf people like you crawl out from...

      -A Religious Fanatic (sic)
      P.S No offense intended to anybody except the original poster...

    5. Re:I don't trust India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has become fashionable in some US circles to dismiss concerns for India's security as Hindu fascism.

    6. Re:I don't trust India. by Newtron · · Score: 1

      I will accept that analogy on the day when a iraqi citizen have a right to vote for US President's election.

    7. Re:I don't trust India. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      India should abandon nuclear weapons and ICBMs.

      Why should they? If the U.S. won't give up its nukes, then why should the Indians? Why should *anyone* give up *any* weapon of mass destruction so long as the U.S. refuses to do so?

      Hey, what's good for the goose....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    8. Re:I don't trust India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's written by Christian Science Moniter, not exactly a haven of impartiality and reason, espically when it comes to non-christian countries

  41. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Per+Wigren · · Score: 0

    Not long ago (a year or two), a US dollar cost almost 11 SEK (swedish krona). Earlier this week I saw it was down to 7,76 SEK. I think that's a bigger reason the world is turning to Euro than anything else. The US dollar's value is sinking like Titanic while the Euro is pretty stable...

    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  42. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an American I beleive Microsoft is evil and worth ganging up on. Monopolies are the end of capitalism, this is econ 101. MS has gotten too big, assumed monopoly status and needs to be broken. I hope the rest of the world succeeds where Americans have failed. It MUST be destroyed.

  43. Jimmy Farmer by SunPin · · Score: 1

    You mean Carter was cool?

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Jimmy Farmer by yodha · · Score: 1

      The equivalent of a President in the USA is a Prime Minister in India. A President in India has different powers.

    2. Re:Jimmy Farmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you've got it the wrong way round. The president of the US is as public as the Prime Minister of India. The Pres of India is a 'background' figure as is the PM of the US.

    3. Re:Jimmy Farmer by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      Some people would say: yes, he is.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    4. Re:Jimmy Farmer by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Sure, the only problem is he had to pretend to be a slack-jawed yokel to get elected. Just like... about every president since Nixon. I guess we learned not to let the crafty ones near the executive-order pen.

  44. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's not anti-americanism to hate the rabid dog you guys have let run free in the name of capitalism.

    Rein in MS before you become the only country left beholden to it ...

  45. presidentofindia.nic.in runs IIS on Win2k by hotchai · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh the irony!

    1. Re:presidentofindia.nic.in runs IIS on Win2k by nikhil_g · · Score: 1

      doubly ironic actually..

      NIC has had a long history of network infrastructure based on Unix boxes.

      --
      #include
  46. CalTech by sxltrex · · Score: 2, Funny
    To be noted is that he made the speech (look for the "Think Different" section) at the famous Indian Institute of Information Technology (India's foremost academic institution equivalent to MIT).


    Huh. And I always thought India's foremost academic institution was CalTech--Calcutta Technical Institute!

    :-)

    1. Re:CalTech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Behold the power of calcutta

      I'm from there :woot:

    2. Re:CalTech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh not either of the MITs?
      Madras Institute of Technology (and)
      Manipal Institute of Technology

    3. Re:CalTech by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Dr Kalam graduated from MIT, Madras Institute of Technology. :-)

  47. Great News by wahgnube · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was just reading a book written by the Indian president, Igniting Minds and came to realize how forward thinking and intellectually "fresh" (childlike.. curious, don't take stuff for granted, asking extremely basic questions...) this great man really is. This is great news, in the sense that there are people at "higher levels" who have foresight in science/technology. I hope it sets a precedent for other countries as well. In a side note, the IIIT is not a premier institution, no where near the league of the institutions equivalent of MIT here.

    1. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIT (Indian Institute of Technology) is an MIT league institution.

      IIIT (Indian Institute of Information Technology), I don't know.

  48. Whoa....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "What should be noted about him is that he is not a politician, but a scientist and an independent thinker foremost." "

    Whoa. Electing a thinker. What a bizarre concept.

    Those whacky Indians. Let's rain some "Freedom" down on their asses.

    1. Re:Whoa....... by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, England already did it.

    2. Re:Whoa....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he is not elected directly but by the Members of Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies. Different from the US system where the President is directly elected.

  49. not the govt stand by patanish · · Score: 1

    Few days back after Gates visit to India, the indian IT minister announced that the govt of India is not going the OSS way....its strange to hear this president's quote today.

    1. Re:not the govt stand by rg117 · · Score: 1

      What the minister said was that they were not going to legislate to mandate OSS. They were going to look at things on a case by case basis.

      Linux where Linux is best
      MS Windows where MS Windows is best
      Sun where Sun is best
      etc,

      You get my point

  50. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by zonix · · Score: 1
    Good thing there isn't a European Microsoft...I mean a wholly European, closed-source company that people could go to instead of MS.

    There could have been - they're just being bought before they can really make a difference.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  51. Re:a new predication for armed conflict? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey pal, this is Slashdot. If you post pro-Microsoft crap you get zapped. You should know the rules by now. Your post should have been formatted like this:

    "F*ck Microsoft! Go OSS! Go India!"

    That would have given you a +5 Insightful mod. Now, let's be careful out there.....

  52. Re:a new predication for armed conflict? by RonenKauffman · · Score: 1

    if you read the comment you would see that not only is it anti-Microsoft but anti-corporate lobby. wipe the nerd juice off your glasses.

    --

    ----------------------
    RKauffman s.e.c.r.e.t.m.e.d.i.a.g.r.o.u.p
  53. Bad day for Microsoft? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Man, it just goes from bad to worse for Microsoft today, huh?

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  54. Ignore the President of India by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 1

    Where's the free market in programming? If those students are looking for a programming job wouldn't they want to learn the most marketable skill? Damn it, be a programming whore! Ignore the President of India.

    --
    --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
  55. Memo: To all Microsoft Employees by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

    Effective immediatly, all employees are urged to boycott the purchase of Slurpies. This includes all flavors (even my favorite, Code Red).

    Thank you for your support.

    Your pal,

    Billy G.

  56. Productivity software is the pebble by SunPin · · Score: 0

    Perhaps. However, OSS still needs to get friendlier with names and documentation. It's still not easy for an ordinary clone to install programs on Linux. Provided that they pass that point, they need to know how to use it. OpenOffice is disappointing because it does not have a word count feature. The sheer number of writers--paid and unpaid--that putz around on the Internet would easily destroy Microsoft's grip on productivity software if it weren't for that major oversight. Journalists tend to seek objectivity (even if they don't always succeed.) That means OpenOffice's status as free would bring them closer to that ideal standard. Most writers want to achieve an intellectual detachment from their subjects. Unfortunately, a very real world problem like word count will torpedo the transition until it's corrected.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Productivity software is the pebble by oxygene2k2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      File - Properties - Statistics - Update, "Word count"

      what was it that stops writers to adopt OpenOffice?

    2. Re:Productivity software is the pebble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a writer and I've used OpenOffice since March 2002. Great program. I wrote articles and a novel. Just upgraded to 1.1 beta2 yesterday.

    3. Re:Productivity software is the pebble by brettlbecker · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about names of applications (gawk, sodipodi, sed, gcombust, etc) and documentation, however, this is, to a certain extent, the historical nature of the beast. Whereas, for example, Windows has had to cater to the computer-illiterate masses in order to increase its market share and profitability, and therefore had to come up with ridiculously simple naming schemes (My Network Places, My Pictures, Internet Explorer, etc etc), the UNIX world developed by-and-large on a guru basis, with the servers running all the enterprise software that no one but the geeks knew about anyway.

      This is the same deal with documentation. The administrators of the enterprise software were more often than not also the developers, or closely related thereto, and so had less worries about getting to know new software. They were and are already inside.

      Of course, as this kind of paradigm becomes more popular, this will have to change. And, if you watch any of the desktop projects, things have come a long way in a very short time. Documentation is still the big issue, though... but the beauty of the system, which of course you know, is that anyone who is familiar with it can write the documentation and offer it to the knowledge-pool.

      On the OpenOffice topic, for still being a 1.0 series, I think the developers have done an amazing job. Which iteration of MSOffice do we use now? They ran out of meaningful numbers! OOo already fully supports XML, as well as being able to read and write (okay, this is not perfect, but evolving) many other document types.

      Exciting times, and maybe not only if you're a geek.

      B

      --
      "We must still have chaos within in order to be able to give birth to a dancing star." --Friedrich Nietzsche
  57. coming soon to a town near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, I can see it now.

    -less and less IT jobs in North America. What you are doing now will be done by some curry head for $3.50 an hour.

    -Large Coporate support will all be handled in India. You can look forward to tech support that can barely speak proper english, rolls their R's when they do.

    Support your local economy. Buy products made in North America. Refuse to have some curry head speak to you in half assed english. Insist to speak to FULLY english speaking engineers.

    Fuck'em all!

    1. Re:coming soon to a town near you by rg117 · · Score: 1

      Good Point
      Support you local economy. refuse to buy ANYTHING from North America

  58. this is a dodgy comment by RonenKauffman · · Score: 1

    they call in culturally institutionalized racism. when you link 7-11 and India this way it seems really sketchy. The quivalent of walking down the street in NYC with a Klan robe on.

    --

    ----------------------
    RKauffman s.e.c.r.e.t.m.e.d.i.a.g.r.o.u.p
    1. Re:this is a dodgy comment by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. It is not racism, and where I live they are owned by Indians or Pakistanis.

      No, the comment stands. Try loosening your shorts a notch. That's the problem with this country, over the top political correctness.

    2. Re:this is a dodgy comment by SunPin · · Score: 1

      There's no equivalent at all... give the man a break, it was a joke. You are probably the same kind of idiot that thought Tropico made fun of Hispanics while ignoring the huge mountain of games about the Mafia and their "sketchy" culturally institutionalized references to Italians. Get over yourself and lighten up.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    3. Re:this is a dodgy comment by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I've been in hundreds of 7-11 convenience stores and don't remember a single one of them NOT being staffed by someone appearing to be from that part of the world.

      And why might I ask is it racism to imply that many or all 7-11 stores are Indian run? Racism is the belief that one race is superior to another. I don't see how "All 7-11 stores are run by Indians" can possible be equal to "Indians are inferior to my race."

      Would it be racism to say that most Americans are idiots? Or, with so much evidence supporting that notion, is it simply a cultural observation?

      So, what I'll say is: "they call in culturally institutionalized liberal reactionism." When you take the time to notice trends in the real world, you're automatically a racist pig who deserves to be butchered and fed to pigs.

      And where, might I ask, is it made wrong or illegal to walk down the street in NYC with a Klan robe on? Members of the Ku Klux Klan have the same right to freedom of expression and speech that you and I do. It's the liberal left that endeavors to censor free speech and expression from groups or individuals that they do not agree with. This is not only hypocrisy, but also illegal. I may not agree with the principles of the KKK, but I will defend their right to believe what they believe. The same goes for any other group the foundations of which I believe are incorrect.

      When you start censuring people for their beliefs, you are far worse than the "racist" you think someone is.

      Offtopic, but it had to be said...

    4. Re:this is a dodgy comment by mikefoley · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should watch more of the Simpsons.

      I present to you Apu Nahasapeemapetilon
      and the Kwik-E-Mart.

      http://animatedtv.about.com/cs/apu/

      --
      What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
    5. Re:this is a dodgy comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, "American" isn't a race.

    6. Re:this is a dodgy comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While I don't entirely agree with the grandparent's point, I would nevertheless point out that it's important to see in what direction the corelation is made in order to determine the existence of racist attitudes.

      For example, having made the observation that you have made, ie. that the majority of 7-11s you've been to are staffed by people of Middle Eastern descent, then to be presented with 7-11 and automatically think of Middle Easterners is fairly common sense. But, to take it in the other direction, ie. to be presented with Middle Easterners and automatically think of 7-11, is misleading, wrong, and potentially racist.

      Even if the majority of 7-11s are staffed by Middle Easterners (not even close to being true in my part of the world, but presumably true where you're from), it is nevertheless not true that the majority of Middle Easterners work at 7-11.

  59. Re:a new predication for armed conflict? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it was modded as flamebait because your argument is just conspiracy theory BS.. and your decision to attack those responded to you shows that maybe /. was being preemptive by labeling your post flamebait because they knew you'd end up being a pric&.

  60. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Xabraxas · · Score: 0
    This crowd is a bunch of hypocrites. Just have a look at this: While some develop OSS to scratch an itch, other (who've gone through that already), now loot from the first ones' effort. But OSS developers fancy that -people exploiting them.

    I don't know where you are getting this from. Someone cannot steal GPL'd code and close the source. If you use GPL code then you have to GPL your work. The BSD license is different but the GPL is more common.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  61. IIT or IIIT that is equivalent of MIT? by kalki · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Its IIT (Indian Institute of Technology) that is equivalent of MIT, notIIIT which is International Institute of Infomation Technology formally know as Indian Institute of Information Technology. IIIT is a new Institution started in 1998, that still has a long way to go get any recognition and standard of IIT (The MIT equivalent). Check this article Bill Gates inaugurated IIT meetIIT

  62. Interesting for India's - and the world's - future by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Interesting
    India it would appear is working incredibly hard to drag itself out of its near third world state - it has one of the most prestigious technical universities in the world (the Indian Institute of Technology, who's graduates include Vinod Khosla, the co-founder of Sun Microsystems Inc.).

    It has programmers that may not be paid as much as their US counterparts, but for this very reason are being courted heavily.

    So, you're the President of India. You're trying to make your country more money. Which will you do: churn your countries workers into Microsoft developers, or work with Open Source?

    Microsoft Advantages:
    • Major desktop monopoly.
    • Large funds to finance new infrastructure, education, etc.
    • Major business ties, especially in the United States.


    Open Source Advantages:
    • Free (as in Beer) - your students/average citizen can get ahold of it.
    • Free (as in Speech) - if your companies should ever start to compete with Windows in a major way (thereby making India more money from paid developers/consultants), you don't have to worry about some unknown factor messing them up *cough*DR-DOS*cough*.)
    • Open Source is making huge inroads into the server market. If you support Microsoft, you support Microsoft's growth, which *might* mean more money for India, but *certainly* means more money to Microsoft than India would get. Supporting Open Source and being the best at it guaruntees more money to India in the long haul.
    • Piracy - my understanding is that piracy is pretty much a problem in nearly every Asian/Middle Eastern country, including India. If you support Open Source now (which is pretty much pirate proof), you can actually cut down on piracy in the long term. (You can't steal what is free - which means you have money to spend on something else.) If India should develop major anti-piracy laws in the future, having much of your software being Open Source cuts down on all the nasty legal issues.
    • Decrease business overhead. Open Source software typically runs on cheaper components, so Indian businesses that use that can save money on hardware (and software, natch) with Open Source, which means more money to give to programmers/company bottom line. More money in the business sector means more money in citizens hands, and "trickle down" theory says "Hello!".
    • Broader variety of hardware support. If an Indian company were to come out with its own computer chip technology/plants to compete with Intel, Open Source would allow that company to have a quick access to applications (granted, there would be the issue of compilation/etc, but at least there would be a common base to start with).


    I'm sure it wasn't easy for this gentleman to have to explain these ideas to Mr. Gates. I'm not saying that Mr. Gates is a bad person in general - but having a potential 1 billion market right in front of you and told that the competitor has the inside track (especially after all the charitable donations to that country) probably didn't help his appetite very much.

    The interesting thing is how this will trickle out. Why did Unix make it big in the business world? Well, students trained on it, and when they entered the Work WorldTM, they said "Hey - I can make a Unix server and solve problem XYZ." This is something that Microsoft has bet on as they help finance education - churning out the folks who "know thier stuff".

    If more companies are turning to Linux for their development/help desk needs, odds are, a student with an Open Source education will propose using Open Source tools to solve the problem.

    It's very, very interesting. There are cracks appearing in the walls, and I'm wondering how much longer the flood will be held back.

    Ah, well - at least Apple isn't going out of business this month. (And they're getting pretty good about supporting Open Source too. Hmmmmm....)
  63. In Related News ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The President of India also advocated that Indian IT professionals continue to STFU about the hellish commutes to slave wage jobs saying "Once all of the American tech jobs migrate here, we'll give you and extra rupie." He also pointed out that the shrewd IT professional should invest their extra rupie in air conditioners, as temperatures are sure to rise if his other high profile advocacy position, Nuclear War with Pakistan, gets wide acceptance. Trully a great man.

  64. Re:Stop with the Red articles by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

    You must FREAK OUT watching all the colours on the tv!

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  65. dont you love racism? by RonenKauffman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    go throw yourself out a window. do us all the favor. (and take your racist shit with you, ugly Amercian) (PS im a white guy from NYC)

    --

    ----------------------
    RKauffman s.e.c.r.e.t.m.e.d.i.a.g.r.o.u.p
  66. when is a market saturated? by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    --the whole idea of developing a market skill is so you can market yourself. Dumping millions more microsoft admins and developers out there just dilutes anyone's marketability-at THIS TIME- it would appear. Seems like you have to walk a line between today and tomorrow, and I'd slap me money on open source eventually "winning" or at least increasing global market and mindshare. There simply have to be many Indians who can see this. also the comments section on the linked story tends to support that idea by a wide margin.

    Everytime I look at it, it is obvious that microsoft feels the same way, else they wouldn't bother in offering incentives down to zero cost, giving away licenses, etc, because there would be no need if they didn't see it or believe it. They could even INCREASE prices if they didn't feel open source was a threat to their dominance. And also tending to lobby for legislative efforts that would further lock themselves in "legally" somehow, establish clear governmental and corporate ties mandated by law. It's a cliche but that is clearly-fascistic. That's a desperation move on their part, or seems so to me anyway.

    IMO, this past year hit the turning point in open source being way good enough for about any use,for any user level. Before still a little clunky and rough around the edges, but now? Naw, plenty good enough to compete with microsoft, propieatry unixes, mac osx, etc for well over 90% of any conceivable use out there, at any level. Even a complete GUI person like moi has little problems with normal non exotic applications with Linux for example. 3 years ago I took a qucik look at it and didn't even bother trying, because I knew I couldn't use it effectively. last yerar I tried again, MUCH MUCH better, the advances were probably more obvious to someone like me than for someone who had been using linux whatever for many many years, because they saw the advances in very small incremental steps. What I "saw" was a decade worth of advancement in a year or two compared to windows or like previous mac classic. That was enough for me to predict eventual open source dominance. Open source went from a V2 rocket level to a Saturn V and moon landing in a few years, so that trend and rapidity of development will continue most likely.

    And the price is sure right-on, trebly more important in areas of the planet where the average wage is dismal. The security is right-on. The customize-ability is right-on. The enthusiasm is right-on. The mindshare with younger geeks is right-on. The license choices are right-on. Hardware is getting cheaper and cheaper and now it's just a matter of time where choice of installed OS is just common, not an aberration at any retail level. Once that occurs it's a new wide open market again, and it's *this close* right now.

    And as to "jobs", any nation makes more money by trading with itself as much as possible, and keeping the money recycliing as close to home, rather than exporting it. India and china in particular are in a unique position where there populations are simply so gigantic that they can take advantage of that. Sure, expat workers sending money back home helps, but CREATING the wealth and money in the first place at home is an economic force multiplier. An example opf that was when the US primarily did this with a more diversified economy, and vertical integration of the various sub niches of the economy. Since we went to exporting our developed ability to create wealth, we've gone from the worlds largest creditor nation to worlds largest debtor nation. India would be WAY smart to not duplicate that mistake,to listen to the thinkers rather than the high level market skimmers, and to seek to get more independent, not more dependent, in IT or anything else.

  67. Mod up! by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
    Spot on.

    Until the US realises that it can't go on forever creating debt that it can never pay, the wise (long term) money will be on currencies like the Euro that don't generate more debt than income, and don't think that they can print their way out of recession.

    The recent authorisation of an increase in US debt to over 7 trillion dollars will do nothing for the confidence of those who have to trade in this essentially baseless currency.

    IIRC, Alan G's quote was that other countries don't have sufficiently inflationary policies, which makes the dollar look bad.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    1. Re:Mod up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fucking idiot.
      Europe with is "wise" currencu policy hasn for once in the last 20 years managed to outgrow US in terms of real economic growth and you are fucking talking about "generating more debt than income".
      Do you even fucking know what the hell are you talking about ?

    2. Re:Mod up! by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Oooh - a brave AC.

      Growth funded on defecit and money printed with no real backing is not sustainable. I wouldn't even describe it as real growth. It fed the dot-bomb bubble, and has led to Dubya being the first president in the post-war years to actually reduce the number of jobs in the US economy.

      Do you know what you're talking about?

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  68. IIT = Indian Institute of Technology by sujan · · Score: 0

    Get that, you dumbass.

  69. Any IIT grads out there? by tundog · · Score: 1


    Maybe I'm out of the loop becuase I've been out of University for about 4 years now, but when I was there any type of science degree meant that you picked up find . -name "*.cpp" | xargs grep "include pr0n.h" witin your first two years or you changed your major to Poli-Sci or MIS.

    The year I graduated they had just put in a huge NT lab, so maybe the computing infrastructures of Universities are changing. I would exepect that *nix stations would play a big part of any Uni infrastrucutre. Isn't that the case at ITT, in which case raising the red flag for OSS is redundant?

    --
    All your base are belong to us!
    1. Re:Any IIT grads out there? by happybizz · · Score: 1

      oh sure! it was the same at computer science at IIT Kanpur and atleast till 2000, when I graduated. Linux, Solaris and HP Unix machines was what computing was on and a small Windows lab ( but no one really went into it, except for enjoying multiplayer Age of Empires sometimes :))

      This institute is a brand new one, an IIIT and established with some private funding etc. Maybe that is the reason for extensive use of Windows and the subsequent "open source advocating" speech by Dr. Kalam.

  70. Re:offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you were moderated "-1 Offtopic" because there is no "-1 Stupid". You can expect the same to happen to your followup post.

  71. Re:a new predication for armed conflict? by RonenKauffman · · Score: 1

    1) learn the difference betweeen an argument and a statement. an argument has a thesis, a statement is a descriptor. 2) its not my opinion that lobbyists control congress. it's fact. go read a book that doesn't have anything to do with computers.

    --

    ----------------------
    RKauffman s.e.c.r.e.t.m.e.d.i.a.g.r.o.u.p
  72. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a good thing buy US products!

  73. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy dogshit. I post a legitimate comment that generates meaningful dialogue and get modded to -1. What the hell do I have to do...TYPE IN CAPITALS, or perhaps mention something about how MICROSFOT SI EVAL!!!???

    Or maybe just post some ASCII art, or perhaps make a reference to CowboyNeal. Or perhaps poste a goatse link. Or perhaps say how IN SVOIET RUSSIA, INDIA EXPORTS YUO? What the hell are the mods smoking? JESUS CHRIST!

  74. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    Politics? I kinda figured it was just the euro rising and being stable enough for rich people to be willing to keep their money in it. I mean, we're going into economic stimulus season, which means a few hundred billion getting pumped into the market this time, and if you're a rich enough bastard to make it worthwhile, you might as well move your money out now and make a load or two converting back once the dollar hits bottom.

    Or have you been watching Fox again?

  75. IIIT is not IIT by mmThe1 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Just a couple of (redundant) corrections:

    1. IIIT is *not* the Indian equivalent of MIT. The story poster perhaps confused it with IITs (Indian Institutes of Technology). [ the best regarded technical education institutes in India ... comparison with MIT is a different debate altogether... ]

    2. The name is not "Indian Institute of Information Technology", after a court order, the present name was changed to "International Institute of Information Technology".

    It is an institute supported by many IT companies (including IBM and Microsoft), though that hasn't helped much to raise the academic standards much in comparison to IITs in India.

  76. Not the IIT, the IIIT - BIG DIFFERENCE... by pendsepr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Not that it reduces the impact of the statement, but the speech was made at the Indian Institute of INFORMATION Technology (IIIT) in Pune. And not at one of Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT). While the IITs can be considered equivalent of MIT, IIIT is focused on IT. Just to be clear on this...

  77. My eyes glaze over... by Queelix · · Score: 1

    The second paragraph of the speech begins...

    "Today IT and telecom are an integrated system this is the accelerator of service levels that could be extended to every citizen and multiplier of user segments sharing the knowledge products for development."

    Waaa???

  78. Not my first choice of proponent by sam_handelman · · Score: 2, Informative

    The President of India is a symbolic position. The Prime Minister has the real power.

    President Kalam is clearly a brilliant man, no question. So, of course he isn't fooled by Microsoft FUD, and he's a security minded hindu nationalist, so naturally he favors open source, which is more secure, and more independent of US influence.

    Before he was President, he was the chief scientific advisor to the government for many years (decades, I believe.) He's been a major proponent of high tech military Indian Nationalism; he was the candidate of the hindu nationalist party, the right wing nuts who won't prosecute people for butchering muslims. He's been a major proponent of nuclear proliferation on the subcontinent, as well; he actually designed the missiles that would deliver an Indian nuke.

    I wouldn't want Oppenheimer to be President, either:

    "Dreams float on an impatient wind, A wind that wants to create a new order. An order of strength and thundering of fire." -- from a poem written by Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam

    How charmingly Vedic! The thunder and fire theme is reminiscent to some of history's best known rightist demagogues.

    A little bio of the man, from a supporter.

    So, okay, he's one of us (one of us! one of us!) On the other hand, so is Ted Kaczynski, and I'm sure he favors Linux, too. These are endorsements I could live without.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:Not my first choice of proponent by manastungare · · Score: 1

      FYI, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam is a Muslim himself, although backed by the reportedly Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party.

    2. Re:Not my first choice of proponent by bstadil · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't want Oppenheimer to be President, either:

      Why not exactly, except for the little problem with being dead. He was well educated, excellent consensus builder, and a humanist despite the bomb effort he agreed to undertake at a time of Real war.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    3. Re:Not my first choice of proponent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you be "hindu nationalist" without being a hindu? In case you failed to notice, Dr.A.P.J Abdul Kalam is muslim. Anyway, I agree with you on the issue about the nationalist party being a bunch of right winger wacko's though. I was as surprised as anyone else when I heard the Dr. Kalam was going to be the president.

    4. Re:Not my first choice of proponent by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

      He's the candidate of the "hindu nationalist" party; therefore I assumed he was a "hindu nationalist" in the sense of party affiliation. Evidently he is not.

      He's an Indian Nationalist in an ideological sense - to the extent that he supports India having nuclear weapons, this bother me a lot. If you read his quotes he talks like a fascist, to boot.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    5. Re:Not my first choice of proponent by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Most of the Indian political spectrum of the Indian political spectrum supported Dr Kalam's candidature, and this includes the (Hindu nationalist, as you put it) BJP, the reformist-minded TDP, the (presumably) secular Congress and even the Muslim-right-wing MIM. (He is, after all, Muslim)

      Also, writing poems that talk about the five elements doesn't make it Vedic. Trust me, there's a lot more to the Vedas than the five elements.

  79. Microsoft Revenues Currently/Recenly 60% Overseas by SilentMajority · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given that the MAJORITY of Microsoft's revenues come from overseas, this type of news along with the recent one about Munich Germany switching to Linux is significant.

  80. Ingrate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft hires everyone in the country who can write a "Hello, world!" program practically every year, and THIS is how they show their thanks? The NERVE!

    I guess now Microsoft will avenge this slight by buying Pakistan and using it to drive India out of business.

    1. Re:Ingrate! by xzap · · Score: 1

      thats bullshit. Microsoft doesnt hire even 5% of India's software professionals.

  81. international not american by asv108 · · Score: 1
    There is no need to get defensive or use personal attacks, what I was trying to say is because the large percentage of international students from all around the world that apply to MIT increases its talent pool. What percentage do Americans and other international students make up of IIT's applicant pool? Can international students even apply?

    How is my previous comment racist or US-centric in any way? I guess the easy route to take is to dismiss any criticism or objectivity as racist..

    1. Re:international not american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How is my previous comment racist or US-centric in any way? I guess the easy route to take is to dismiss any criticism or objectivity as racist..

      It wasn't. The previous poster is just an asshole, whatever country (s)he may be from.

    2. Re:international not american by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

      lets not talk about the applicant pool. it makes more sense to talk about accepted students the fact that MIT accepts so many US students just decreases their talent pool.

    3. Re:international not american by adityak · · Score: 1

      Just a couple of points ... international students can get into IIT, infact IIT does accept SAT results or used to anyways ... so i would say that they have it slightly easier than those going for the Joint Enterance Exam or JEE Also, a significant number of IITians who want to go for higher studies abroad are easily able to get into prestigious universities/ ivy league colleges without problems. Cheers

    4. Re:international not american by adityak · · Score: 1

      BTW .. the posting was just meant to convey some information. The wording may sound a but off and if anyone is hurt by it, i apologize :) that was not the intention. Aditya

  82. PM of the US??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Actually, you've got it the wrong way round. The
    >president of the US is as public as the Prime
    >Minister of India. The Pres of India is
    >a 'background' figure as is the PM of the US.

    You must be an American...

    1. Re:PM of the US??? by rkz · · Score: 1

      Whos the PM of America? Tony Blair??

  83. OT wanderings by Trevalyx · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You must remember that you are speaking with an American. In their eyes, if you don't live in the "Good Ol' US of A" then you are living in a gutter and probably a terrorist.


    Oh, come on now, no need to be vicious. Certainly, as Americans we tend to be somewhat elitist, ethnocentric, and globally unaware, but don't confuse the thoughts of the most audible with the thoughts of the less vocal majority.. Most Americans don't think that just because someone is a foreigner that they are a terrorist, up to no good, or are a drag on the economy. Certainly, they have some fear of people of middle-Eastern descent, but you can't really begrudge them that, due to the current state of things. It isn't to say that we should be afraid, but if you get bitten by your neighbor's dog, you're bound to be a bit wary of your neighbor and dogs in general for a while, especially if you see them regularly going after each-other's throats. Not to go on a diatribe here, and I certainly thinkg Americans could stand to be a bit more globally concious, but the time will come when we don't have a choice, and that statement up there just comes across as being bitter. Your posting history doesn't indicate you as being trollish or having a particular appetite for flamebait, so I'll assume you're just having a bad day.. Hope that improves for you.
    1. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Americans don't think that just because someone is a foreigner that they are a terrorist, up to no good, or are a drag on the economy.

      No, it's only a tiny minority of Americans, currently either running the country or having voluntarily voted for them, who think that way.

    2. Re:OT wanderings by StefanF · · Score: 1

      So I expect you belong in the "most audible" group since you compare people outside the good old U.S of A to dogs... :

    3. Re:OT wanderings by Trevalyx · · Score: 1

      Heh, I knew someone was going to latch on to that. I would have come up with a better analogy, but time constraints prevented it. Anyway, what's wrong with dogs? I'm not particularly fond of them, but they are considered "Man's Best Friend" and all. My point is, there are good dogs, and there are bad dogs, and there are dogs whose nature can be mistaken.
      I only wish I were in the most audible group. I've got some unique opinions that I would just lo-ove to voice. :-)

    4. Re:OT wanderings by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      Most Americans don't think that just because someone is a foreigner that they are a terrorist, up to no good,...

      Certainly, they have some fear of people of middle-Eastern descent, but you can't really begrudge them that, due to the current state of things.

      Is this a troll? Fearing a quarter of the world's people because they share a vague similiarity in skin colour, culture and religion (as if there were no diversity in the Middle East!) is unwittingly ignorant and primitive. And making an analogy between people of middle-Eastern descent and vicious dogs, thinking this reasonable and fair, is unbelievable. Without realizing it you demonstarted precisely why much of the world thinks poorly of American.

    5. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Americans don't think that just because someone is a foreigner that they are a terrorist, up to no good, or are a drag on the economy.


      Most Americans don't think.

      Granted, this holds true for most people in any country ...
    6. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      > Is this a troll? Fearing a quarter of the world's people because they share a vague similiarity in skin colour, culture and religion (as if there were no diversity in the Middle East!) is unwittingly ignorant and primitive

      No, because most of them share a religion that at best, tolerates[0], and at worst, actively encourages killing of infidels. Which actively preaches that the goal of the faith is GLOBAL TOTAL conversion. And large elements of which think that deliberately targeting innocent women and children is a Good Thing, rewarded by the deity in the afterlife with XXX virgins awarded to you.

      [0] I will retract that part of the statement if/when you can point me to fatwas issued by all, or at least most, of the major Islamic religious authorities comdemning any deliberate attacks on civilians. As well as speaches to the same effect preached in Mosques.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    7. Re:OT wanderings by loquitus · · Score: 1

      "Somewhat"??? Give me a break... You guys have the right to claim you are the most elitist, ethnocentric, and might I add, globally ignorant people on earth, looking at developed nations (it would not exactly be fair to compare developed nations' peoples to people from some 3rd world underdeveloped country where people may simply not have had the opportunity to learn things, even if they had a desire and will to). I agree with your logic about the dog analogy... I too would be wary of dogs if I were bitten by one. At the same time, why do you taunt dogs and then complain about it when they bite you? This is totally off-topic, but American Foreign Policy is pure CRAP. You piss people off in other countries... and you know these people have no military means to defend or enforce their "ways" and principles... these people will resort to whatever means necessary to protect their way of life. I ain't no American history expert, but most "patriots" during the American Revolution were arguably terrorists too, in the eyes of the "law". History is written by those who win wars.

    8. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      what you are saying about USA may be true in YOUR area, but down here in Kansas, a lot of people (for sure not everybody) are a little bit as described by the first poster. As a foreigner here, people keep asking me if we got popcorn in Germany or if I really write my EMails in german. A friend of mine was asked if Hitler is still living in Germany. I mean, I love being here and there is nothing wrong with that kind of questions, but this is confirming a lot of prejudices some people have about Americans.

      And because I am to stupid to remember my password, I'll post as an anonymous coward.

      redair

    9. Re:OT wanderings by Avakado · · Score: 1

      No, because most of them share a religion that at best, tolerates, and at worst, actively encourages killing of infidels.

      Sounds a lot like christianity

      --
      The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
    10. Re:OT wanderings by Chakde+Phate! · · Score: 1

      No, because most of them share a religion that at best, tolerates[0], and at worst, actively encourages killing of infidels. Which actively preaches that the goal of the faith is GLOBAL TOTAL conversion. And large elements of which think that deliberately targeting innocent women and children is a Good Thing, rewarded by the deity in the afterlife with XXX virgins awarded to you.

      And you (if you are a Christian) share a religion that has in the past promoted the killing of innocents because they are occupying an area of land that you hold sacred, even though they are allowing pilgrims to travel freely there (the Crusades), and promoted the torture of anyone who didn't show enough veneration to its priests (the Spanish Inquisition)

      If you want something a bit more recent, how about the fundamentalist Christian lobby that wants to send schools back to the dark ages and teach Creationism instead of evolution? How about the Catholic church's refusal to accept contraception and abortion, which is a major contributing factor to the population problem in South America, as well as denying women the right to decide whether they want to have a child?

      The point I'm trying to make is that every religion has had its bad moments. Just because a minority of its followers have an interpretation of a religion, it doesn't mean that all its followers can be tarred with the same brush.

    11. Re:OT wanderings by markomarko · · Score: 1

      Most Americans don't think that just because someone is a foreigner that they are a terrorist, up to no good, or are a drag on the economy. Certainly, they have some fear of people of middle-Eastern descent, but you can't really begrudge them that, due to the current state of things. It isn't to say that we should be afraid, but if you get bitten by your neighbor's dog, you're bound to be a bit wary of your neighbor and dogs in general for a while, especially if you see them regularly going after each-other's throats.

      How ironic that you use a dog attack as an analogy in order to speak in defense of racist practices that underscore American ignorance about cultures that lie outside of the black/white cultural dichotomy. If Apu on the Simpsons were a Cotton-Picker lazing about in a cotton-patch, would you still find the show funny? Take a look at how many episodes of SNL use 'brownface' to achieve comedy. This, of course, is just the media side of things...meanwhile, the US government has asked all people of middle-eastern descent (and since when does India support Al-qaeda?) to voluntarily 'register' themselves with INS. Many, including one former Canadian (now a US citizen) I saw interviewed, are detained without charge and subjected to interrogation until they have satisfied their captors that they are not terrorists in waiting, or alternatively, are simply deported back to their country of birth without a hearing or access to legal representation (this happened to a Canadian Citizen on business trip to the US; his family has not heard from him since he was detained at a US airport; US officials deported the man to Syria and will not expand on the case). Until the American government realizes that civil human rights are just that--rights--and are not revocable, you have a greater problem than simply not being "globally conscious"; you're not even "nationally conscious" so long as you treat your own citizens as barely-tolerated guests from a region of the world bent on the destruction of "The West".

    12. Re:OT wanderings by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit Trevalyx:

      Certainly, they have some fear of people of middle-Eastern descent, but you can't really begrudge them that, due to the current state of things.

      OTOH, if I happen to look a bit like the people being dragged off the street and held without trial in the U.S. right now, I can't be begrudged being a little mistrustful of statements like that, right?

      BTW, it only took one idiot cowboy to kill Balbir Singh Sodhi in Mesa, Arizona, because he also looked sort of Middle Eastern...

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    13. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      > > No, because most of them share a religion that at best, tolerates, and at worst, actively encourages killing of infidels.

      > Sounds a lot like christianity

      No, it sounds like christianity long time ago.
      Thankfully, it outgrew such barbarism. Islam have not. How many christian preachers do you see TODAY preaching from their pulpits "death to infidels"?
      How many claim that Timothy McVeigh went to heaven?

      -DVK -- and, BTW, I'm not even Christian, so I am objective about this.

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    14. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      > And you (if you are a Christian) share a religion that has in the past promoted ...
      > Just because a minority of its followers have an interpretation of a religion, it doesn't mean that all its followers can be tarred with the same brush.

      1) i'm not a Christian.
      2) The key words here are PAST and MINORITY.

      I'd feel the same about Christians as I feel about Muslims had I lived during the times of Crusades and Inquisition. (or not lived, as both would have been glad to get rid of me in the most un-gentle ways possible... as I said to the other person who replied to me, this makes me VERY objective about Christianity).

      And it's not "minority" of Muslims who consider terrorism a valid thing, and not a "minority" of their clerics who preach "death to infidels".

      Oh, and you're equating some fundie who tries to ***legally*** proceed with protecting his beliefs (wrong though the strict creationalists' intentions and may be beliefs may be), with a guy whose idea of "due process" is to blow up a woman and her kids to make a point, your value system is seriously wrong.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    15. Re:OT wanderings by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit dvk:

      No, because most of them share a religion that at best, tolerates[0], and at worst, actively encourages killing of infidels.

      Well then it's a good thing Muslims are so conveniently colored so that you can tell them just by looking...

      Oh, wait... What do you mean his name was Mordechai Levy?

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    16. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      What does the coloring have to do with religion? There are Muslims who look "middle-eastern", "black", "white", "asian", and probably any other color/type you can imagine. I was referring to the contents of their heads, not their ethnicity.

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    17. Re:OT wanderings by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit dvk:

      What does the coloring have to do with religion?

      You justified hostility toward people who look Middle Eastern on the basis that (quoting #6068799) ``most of them share a religion'' which you dislike. The fallacy is yours; I was merely attempting to illustrate its absurdity.

      As reprehensible as I find bigotry directed against a man because of the actions of some of his coreligionists (Giovanni is evil because he is Catholic, just like the Omagh bombers), the assumption that all Middle-Eastern-looking men -- tens of millions of whom are Christian, Jewish, Druze, Zoroastrian, Baha'i, Sikh, atheist, etc. -- somehow bear some guilt for the actions of eleven men is evil.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    18. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many christian preachers do you see TODAY preaching from their pulpits "death to infidels"?

      How many muslim preachers doing the same thing do you see?

      I'm not even Christian, so I am objective about this.

      Non-Christianity is neither a prerequisite nor sufficient for being objective.

    19. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      1) The original poster mentioned 3 characteristics: "skin colour, culture and religion". If you read carefully, I ONLY touched the 3-d one (colour wasn't mentioned because it's irrelevant, and culture is impossible to define -unlike religion, the cuyltures of the region are very diverse, though some have shared characteristics.

      2) Read carefully what I wrote. Giovanny is not evil because Real IRA share the same declared religion. Giovanny would be evil if he:

      - provided safe haven and aid to his evil co-religionists. While some Catholics may have supported IRA, I'd be surprized if all but a very few would give money to "Real IRA". And anyone who gave money to them - knowing they plan to kill civilians - deserves to hang by the neck till dead as far as I'm concerned.

      - thinks that it was a Good Thing to target innocents (don't know about IRA or Catholics in Ireland in general - never met any - but at the very least, none of the catholics in the US that I know think so).

      - his priest - and majority of that religion's priests - claim that the bomber went to heaven, and more like him should act the same way. Show me a single Catholic priest who said so, please?

      Yeah, there are whackos in any social group.
      The difference is how the majority of the group react to the wackos - as heroes, or someone who shamed their group.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    20. Re:OT wanderings by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Is it also true that in Germany you have passwords that you have to make an effort to remember? In America(tm), you just name your password after your mother or father and everything is fine.

    21. Re:OT wanderings by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      This new war against islam is the second coming of the crusades.

      Nothing has changed really.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    22. Re:OT wanderings by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      " How many christian preachers do you see TODAY preaching from their pulpits "death to infidels"?"

      You don't listen to christian radio do you? Try it sometime.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    23. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's more of us then there are of you :)

      hehehe

    24. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      Eh? The definition of Crusades was a holy war for the purpose of transferring control of "Holy Land" (basically, Jerusalem) from Islam to Xtian control. Let's look at Iraq war (which is what you preobably refer to):

      1) The war deposed NON-muslim ruler Saddam, with the likeliest consequence that more-islamic givernment would take its place in Iraq.
      2) The price of war for Bush was that he sold out Israel to Arabs, basically helping them to gain control of Jerusalem from Jews in the long run.

      Yeah... right... Crusades.... only BACKWARDS.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    25. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      1) Have listened. Would you care to cite one who has called for murder of Muslim or any non-Christian women and childrem, or for that matter, any men who're not combatants?

      2) Even if you find one or two morons lik Graham, or whatever his name is, Christian radio is a vast minority. Fanatics among them are a vast monirity on that radio. A handful of fanatics doen't count aming thousands (or may be hundreds of thousands?) non-fanatical xtian priests worldwide.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    26. Re:OT wanderings by sgups · · Score: 1

      You mean like the pope? He visits India which is the founding land of several religions and his speech can be summarized by the following sentence. "Let the evangelisation begin!" When a religion counts its greatness in being able to convert others (or offers charity in exchange for conversion aka Missionaries of charities and others operating in Asia/Africa) and not respect other religions/ways of life it can't be a religion.

      --
      Democratic USA - Government of the corporations, by the Corporations, for the corporations.
    27. Re:OT wanderings by siliC · · Score: 1

      I am extremely interested in knowing through which sources you have reached the conclusion that "it's not "minority" of Muslims who consider terrorism a valid thing, and not a "minority" of their clerics who preach "death to infidels"."

      From the numbers i've heard - there are nearly 1.5 billion Muslims in the world. If a majority of them are out to get us (i'm an American)... we might just be in as much trouble as the media portrays.

      *note - i do not think a majority of them feel the way you suggest, but i would like to evaluate the sources of your opinion.

    28. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There IS NO DIVERSITY in the Middle East specifically because the current (and recently former) regimes have a nasty habit of killing or driving away anyone who does not think, look, and act exactly like there. There were tens of thousands of Christians and Jews in Baghdad thirty years ago. Fifty years ago there were many different cultures and religions in the Middle East. But ever since Islam has dominated the region, it has been markedly less than any other part of the world.

    29. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only XX vigins, where XX is a number less than 100 and more than 9, although I've heard claims of as few as 7.

    30. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because practically all of those who look Middle Eastern who don't "share a religion" have been "put to the sword" by the followers of said religion.

    31. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 Name one group of people that is less globally ignorant than Americans.

      2. Define terrorist in relation to American "patriots" and give examples of their "terrorism"

      Answers:

      1. No other nation has a more globally diverse population. Americans (individually, as corporations, and governmentally) interact more, with more countries than any other group.

      Whoop-de-doo, Londoners have discovered curry! A single French figure skater was a black Algerian!

      There are more Indians in the USA than all of Europe. More Arabs too. More black Africans, more Chinese, Japanese, Latinos, Vietnamese, Thai, Slavs, etc. There are sizeable groups of Americans representing nearly every single nation, religion, culture and idea from around the globe.

      While most Americans don't speak two European languages, most American's don't have 5 European countries within a day's bus ride. But you'll find a better representation of the diversity of Europe in America than in any single European country.

      2. This is left as an exercise for the reader.

    32. Re:OT wanderings by dvk · · Score: 1

      Much as I hate the pope (for fucking around in Middle-eastern politics - effectively on terrorist's side, all his good intentions nonwithstanding) - he hasn't ever said that killing innocent people is good, has he? He did condemn terrorists from his pulpit.

      Yeah, I like non-evangelizing religions better, being a member of one. But i don't see how you can use the pope as the example for the "bad" activities I desccribed as a sign taht Islam is scary.

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    33. Re:OT wanderings by loquitus · · Score: 1

      1. Yeah.. and how many of those "Americans" you have described (ie: minorities) are really considered Americans? Let's see... the Blacks were enslaved... they still get 2nd class treatment in parts of the US. Asians have been mistreated all the time (remember head taxes?) More specifically, let's not forget the ridiculous treatment of Japanese "Americans" people in WW2. And then... there is the recent crap... all the mistreatment and resentment toward anybody who even looks like an Arab... the Indian guy (a Sikh) who was shot and killed in Texas because some moron thought he was an Arab (and even if he was, why was he shot), and the detainment of people at airports, etc... the list goes on... All I can say is... only in America. Don't use the existence of visible minories to strengthen your argument that you people are globally aware... let's see how many people NOT from those groups of minorities, know anything about the world outside their backyard.

    34. Re:OT wanderings by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "2) The price of war for Bush was that he sold out Israel to Arabs, basically helping them to gain control of Jerusalem from Jews in the long run."

      You are way off. When the dust settles israel will have full control over jerusalem and somewhere around 90% of the settlements on the west bank and gaza will remain.

      Bush is a born again christian. For him it's crucial that the jews return to israel so that jesus can return. He is doing his best to usher in the apocalypse.

      If you watch TV and listen to the representives of the republican party and it's affiliates (those so called think tanks) you will see that they are 100% behind israel. Ariel Sharon will call the shots in the so called "roadmap" just like he has been calling the shots about the entire middle east foreign policy.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    35. Re:OT wanderings by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "Would you care to cite one who has called for murder of Muslim or any non-Christian women and childrem,"

      They don't word it like the muslims do because they are more sophisticated in their rhetoric but make no mistake they are calling for a jihad every day. Although some of them do call for a religious war most of them are more clever about it. For example they will say that every single arab in the world shares the blame for 9/11 and then they will say that those responsible should be killed.

      Also remember they don't have to call for the slaughter of the muslims now because when jesus comes back he will kill all of them anyway. All they have to do is to fulfill the core events of revelation and all the muslims, budhists and other non believers will be killed by god himself.

      Just google for the apocalypse and you will get a full idea how important the book of revelations is to christians.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    36. Re:OT wanderings by deadmantalking · · Score: 1

      > No, because most of them share a religion that at best, tolerates[0], and at worst, actively encourages killing of infidels. Which actively preaches that the goal of the faith is GLOBAL TOTAL conversion. And large elements of which think that deliberately targeting innocent women and children is a Good Thing, rewarded by the deity in the afterlife with XXX virgins awarded to you.

      You mean christianity?

      --
      A crank is a little thing that makes revolutions
    37. Re:OT wanderings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A handful of fanatics [doesn't] count [among] thousands [of] non-fanatical

      I can't think of more than a handful of muslim fanatics.

    38. Re:OT wanderings by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      So I expect you belong in the "most audible" group since you compare people outside the good old U.S of A to dogs...
      No he didn't. If he'd mentioned getting a shock off his neighbour's electric wiring, would he have been comparing foriegners to electricity?

      He used what grownups call an analogy. It's a common method of illustrating a point with a structurally similar or parallel situation, but from a different context or field.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    39. Re:OT wanderings by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      I can't think of more than a handful of muslim fanatics.
      If you're this fucker, that's not very many at all.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    40. Re:OT wanderings by StefanF · · Score: 1

      "He used what grownups call an analogy. It's a common method of illustrating a point with a structurally similar or parallel situation, but from a different context or field." And my post was a (poor) attempt at humor and a cheapshot at americans, I even put a smiley (an icelandic variant that doesn't look good in this font) to ward off fuckers like yourself..

    41. Re:OT wanderings by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Smileys are for losers, you fishy faggot.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  84. From the MS Office EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    You specifically agree not to export or re-export any of the Restricted Components (i) to any country to which the U.S. has embargoed or restricted the export of goods or services, which currently include, but are not necessarily limited to Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria, or to any national of any such country, wherever located, who intends to transmit or transport the Restricted Components back to such country; (ii) to any person or entity who you know or have reason to know will utilize the Restricted Components in the design, development or production of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons; or (iii) to any person or entity who has been prohibited from participating in U.S. export transactions by any federal agency of the U.S. government.

    No wonder the president doesn't like MS, he couldn't use Word to write documents while working on nuclear weapons.

  85. What a hoot by IPFreely · · Score: 2, Insightful

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 29, @10:06AM (#6067180)
    Moderators: Mod Parent Post As A Troll please

    Defending America abroad "the American Way", speaking from anonymity, calling for oppression.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:What a hoot by nathanh · · Score: 1
      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 29, @10:06AM (#6067180) Moderators: Mod Parent Post As A Troll please

      Defending America abroad "the American Way", speaking from anonymity, calling for oppression.

      You must admit, the anonymous coward made my point far better than I ever could.

    2. Re:What a hoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! The terrible oppresion of -1, Troll!

  86. Indiafarming by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Working on OSS while a great thing is not going to bring them the same potential monitary gains as working for a big name software company. It would be great for a country the population of India to listen and follow their leaders urging, but I seriously doubt in a country where many are trying to break free of poverty that they will work for next to nothing on OSS.

    Hmm, seems to me that the Indian tech firms are able to make it just fine by getting programming jobs from ... the US.

    I know a lot of programmers kind of resent this, but it isn't just about them being able to program cheaper. Most of these programming shops in India are at CMM level 3 or higher. That means a lot to big compaines. Not only is it cheaper, but these places put out good, reliable software with good documentation (code, results, requirements, design, etc). That stuff matters. I am currently on a team at my company that is trying to get processes in place to get us to CMM level 2. It is hard. People don't like following processes, don't like documenting what they do, they don't like being held accountable for their work. Some of the good companies in India are at CMM level 5, which is no small feat.

    So instead of people bitching about India, and how they are stealing our jobs, and how they are just clawing their way out of poverty, maybe we should ask WHY they are able to achieve these things when most companies in the US are not. It kind of reminds me of the Japanese car scare, where people would only "buy American" even though American cars completely sucked. The cheaper, more reliable Japanese cars of the late 70's/early 80's sure woke up the US car industry. Maybe it is time the US softare market woke up.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Indiafarming by hughk · · Score: 1
      Lower costs is the answer. How much does a programmer in India earn and how much in the US? Maybe the american programmer is paid more but how much of that income is disposable? These are costs that can't be easily reduced. You can't pay a programmer less than it costs him to live.

      I just hope that India is as open to the import of services as the rest of the world. Last time I heard, it was quite expensive and quite difficult for a foreign company to open up shop there.

      I have no problems about a world market. However, it should always work both ways.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    2. Re:Indiafarming by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      That would be all well and good, if the standards were worth a damn. But they are not.

      Most of the 'process' I have seen is stuck in a strict waterfall methodology/lifecycle that does not take into account reality. In reality there are very few jobs that can be completely spec'd out before hand. For those jobs, the pure waterfall lifecycle works well.

      On the other hand, how many shops use the spiral model for those jobs that don't have clear specifications up front? Not many. Iterative design is not something I see in my dealings with large shops - and when I talk about it, most developers, team leads and project managers scratch thier heads.

      While something may be pretty to look at/well documented, several questions come to mind:

      Is it maintainable? (can you easily/flexibly change it as needed over time?)

      Is it bug free? (meaning does all the specified functionality work as desired?)

      Does it have legs (in other words - will the code stand the test of time, or be rewritten and deprecated in a month)?

      The easier it is to maintain, the better quality (bug free), and the longevity of a system really defines its overall value. If I get a well documented POS that was built using the best process standards in the world - its still a POS. Quantity does not equate to quality. ...thinking of a quote about telling the difference between a silk purse, and a sow's ear...can't recall the words exactly...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Indiafarming by gosand · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That would be all well and good, if the standards were worth a damn. But they are not.

      CMM is no panacea. It is an indicator of how mature your software development process is - nothing more. If all else is equal, the CMM certified shop will win out. But there is also that killer factor of price. Combine lower price with mature development process, and it is tough to beat.

      All of your other concerns are valid concerns, but only one of them can be addressed in this context:
      Is it bug free? (meaning does all the specified functionality work as desired?)

      While having a mature process doesn't guarantee it is bug free, it can lend a little credibility to the fact. I was going to say that this is a totally unrelated thing, but by proving that you have a solid process in place, you are helping to stomp out bugs earlier in the process. No, it won't eliminate them all, but it isn't intended to.

      The other things you mention are valid concerns, but aren't in the context of process. The only thing that having a strong process in place will do is make sure that you can systematically find out some of these issues before it is too late, and you can gather stats to *improve* your process to catch the things that slip through. If you just go about things willy-nilly, you are just fumbling around in the dark. Sometimes that works, most of the time it doesn't. Again, CMM certification isn't the be-all-end-all answer, but it is more than a lot of places have.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    4. Re:Indiafarming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, seems to me that the Indian tech firms are able to make it just fine by getting programming jobs from ... the US.

      If we (the U.S.) educated our kids in Math and Sciences - and instilled in them SOME sort of sense of importance in them - then maybe worrying about this would be not so much of an issue. Cheaper labor is one reason for the migration of jobs, but another is the lack of qualified candidates that actually comprehend the fundumentals behind the concepts. It is as if in the U.S. many kids are on the 'Visual Basic' model of learning. Another reason for India to go OSS...

      This doesn't mean 'you' automatically, so don't go getting all bent out of shape... I'm speaking in general, on the scale of our society as a whole... There, noone's going to get offended by that... :-/

      - - Damn right an anonymous coward...

    5. Re:Indiafarming by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      but it isn't just about them being able to program cheaper. Most of these programming shops in India are at CMM level 3 or higher.
      Ah, CMM. The new ISO 9000.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  87. (Indian President == US VP) != US President. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, US President is almost a dictator.

    Indian President has no power. He is not even popularly elected.

    The real power in the Indian gov't lies with the Indian Prime Minister. He is the majority speaker of the lower house (like US Senate). But, he appoints the cabinet and decides most of the party policies (A la, Tony Blair of the UK).

    So, Indian constitution is a conglomeration of all great constitions: US, UK, even Russia (we have those 5-year plans), etc.

    Just wanted to get that right as I saw a lot of /. compare Kalam with Bush.

    So, if you really want to compare, please compare US VP to Indian Prez.

    1. Re:(Indian President == US VP) != US President. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Indian President has no power. He is not even popularly elected."

      neither was our "President."

  88. PS by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

    The man is personally a MUSLIM.

    I forgot that. Big, important, major point which I should not have left out. My bad.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:PS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, my friend, are a COMPLETE moron.

      You just copy and paste from web site without any knowledge.

      After posting, you read further, that he is a muslim.

      HOLY FUCKING SHIT, that crap about him being a HINDU FUNDAMENTALIST won't fly now...

      CRAP.

      Moderators, please, please, please mod the parent down to (-1; Karma Whoring Bastard)

    2. Re:PS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JACKASS MODERATORS
      GIVING RETARDS LIKE HIM +5

      I SWEAR THIS WILL GET ME +5

      KALAM IS A HINDU FANATIC. HE KILLS ALL MUSLIMS. HE HAS PERSONALLY MURDERED OVER 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 MUSLIMS. LOOK IT UP IN GOOGLE.

      GIMME +5 MODS. I ROCK THE BOAT.

      HOWEVER, WAIT FOR MY NEXT THREAD THAT STATES THAT I FORGOT TO MENTION THAT HE, *HIMSELF*, IS ACTUALLY A MUSLIM.

  89. The irony of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A book called Igniting Minds by someone who worked on nuclear weapons. That just kills me.

  90. Aargh. IIIT != IIT by obnoximoron · · Score: 1

    The president made the speech at IIIT, not IIT. And by the way, there are six different IITs situated at 6 different cities in India and each of them functions independently. In fact, the 6 IITs are always competing with each other in overall rankings and in different fields.

    For example, IIT-Bombay (now named IIT-Mumbai) greatly increased in overall rankings after yours truly graduated from it.

    1. Re:Aargh. IIIT != IIT by Darby · · Score: 1

      For example, IIT-Bombay (now named IIT-Mumbai) greatly increased in overall rankings after yours truly graduated from it.

      So you're saying that their stats went up once you left? ;-)

    2. Re:Aargh. IIIT != IIT by obnoximoron · · Score: 1

      Hehe. You got it.

  91. Neighborhood effects by SunPin · · Score: 1

    The bottom line is that the industry can't continue with expecting people to pay for the operating system. In economic terms, the operating system has a "neighborhood effect" meaning that everyone needs it and it can't be paid for through a typical contract. An example of this is the road system in the US. We indirectly pay for it because everyone pays for it through gas tax. Because everyone pays for it, nobody really pays for it. The roads are kept very well here and nobody goes knocking on my door to demand payment for the next road upgrade.

    Where I disagree with you is on piracy. I think the operating system should be free, programming languages should be free and that's it. The point of a free operating system is to foster a competitive environment. Companies still need assurances that they can write software without giving it away. There's no justification for innovation if they can't benefit from the level playing field of Linux.

    Piracy of operating systems will end but not piracy itself.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Neighborhood effects by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      I think the operating system should be free, programming languages should be free and that's it. The point of a free operating system is to foster a competitive environment. Companies still need assurances that they can write software without giving it away. There's no justification for innovation if they can't benefit from the level playing field of Linux.


      Companies are certainly able to write software without giving it away. What they don't get is a guarentee that it will sell. But then... they don't have that guarentee in any environment.

      What a company has to do is create a viable product, enter the market, and compete. That competition includes competing against Free alternatives.

      I know my own preferences favor Open Source alternatives. I will give a lot of credit to an Open Source product and pick it over proprietary alternatives if possible. That doesn't mean that proprietary alternatives can't compete and can't win. In fact, I'm currently looking at a system that consists of little more than commodity hardware, a custom commodity OS (Linux), and very expensive software. I am willing to buy a product that delivers what its competitors can not.

      Of course, I continue to look for Open Source alternatives. I will continue to favor them. I will prefer companies who help Open Source projects. My spending and support will reflect these preferences. So even though I am currently looking at a proprietary solution, it doesn't mean this company will not feel pressure.

      But again... that pressure is competition. If a company can't compete, then it has no place in the market (assuming that market is healthy).
    2. Re:Neighborhood effects by SunPin · · Score: 1

      Exactly. That's how the system should operate. That's, hopefully, the legacy of Munich. Linux should be about preventing power from concentrating in any one company and fostering competition between and within commercial and free software. I keep arms length from the extreme end of free software because their philosophy doesn't guarantee the future of Linux. Only starting from the viewpoint that Linux creates competition and knocks down barriers to entry is what will convert governments and corporations.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
  92. I don't trust USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amerika should abandon nuclear weapons.

    Amerika should stop tolerating pograms against minorities (DMCA).

    Amerika should address their grievous repression
    of "lower castes" ("Niggers", amerikan natives).

    Amerika should listen to the UN.

    Maybe if they addressed these, we could take
    your comment seriously.

  93. "FUD" implies lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And the only ones I know who get "fed [sic] with the OSS anti-Microsoft FUD" are the "engineers" who don't have the real skills to earn good money in the computer industry except by whoring themselves and tying their own future to that of M$ by trying to be a certification weenie. Anyone with real computer skills at least gets a chuckle out of the way a true grass-roots movement is opening peoples eyes to the shrink-wrapped turds that get shipped out of Redmond. There's a reason you see BSOD jokes on TV and in comic strips.

    I have no use for dumb-ass MCSE's who barely know how to RTFM and whose first response to a problem is to reboot their god damned toy computer.

    As for OSS security, don't you think there's a reason that the NSA chose Linux as their secure operating system of choice and contributed their own improvements to OSS?

    And if you want to avoid a security pissing contest you really should avoid the side of "Outlook" and "IIS" and "Slammer" and "Nimda".

    You fucking moron.

  94. Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0, Troll

    Take the pharmaceutical industry at the moment, India has big companies manufacturing generic medicines.

    Unfortunately, this is one industry that will soon cease to exist, at least if the current US-sponsored World Trade Organisation initiatives to force India to recognise drug patents is successful.

    Right now, there are literally millions of people in India, the rest of Asia and elsewhere in the developing world who benefit from cheap pharmaceuticals that have been produced in India by generic drugs manufacturers. These people, 99.99 percent of which would never be able to afford the non-generic variants of their medicines, are totally reliant on the inexpensive medicines that the generic drugs manufacturers currently supply. Cut off the source, and those millions will suffer greatly, and many of them will die.

    Obviously, the WTO and the large, western drugs companies are well aware of the consequences of shutting down the Indian pharmaceutical industry. They care more about their lost profits (as if someone who lives in the developing world would ever be able to pay their inflated prices) then they do about human suffering.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: the large multinational drugs companies (eg, Glaxo, Monsanto, Novartis, etc) are a plague: they continually put profits before people.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to recognize the fact that if developing drugs becomes unprofitable , these evil drug companies will stop doing that.
      Simple as that - no profit, no new development. Do you think these cheap Indian manufacturing places will take on costly research and development ?

    2. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >the large multinational drugs companies (eg, Glaxo, Monsanto, Novartis, etc) are a plague: they continually put profits before people.

      Generic phamaceutical companies don't do research.

      So if we got rid of the evil multinational drug companies, how will we get new treatment drugs?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Do you think these cheap Indian manufacturing places will take on costly research and development ?

      No. Given that they're in India, they'll probably be able to do research and development rather cheaply.

    4. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      Considering how important health is and how it would solve a huge number of social issues, you would think they would research new treatments rather than building three-tiered web sites.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by dvk · · Score: 1

      > I've said it before and I'll say it again: the large multinational drugs companies (eg, Glaxo, Monsanto, Novartis, etc) are a plague: they continually put profits before people.

      Oh... and dare I ask, why don't those Indian companies manufacture generic drugs based on research performed by NON-evil drug companies?

      There Ain't No Such Thing As Free Lunch, commie boy. You want to have those medicines, someone's gotta pay for the development. And those cheapo generic manufacturers in India won't and can't. So basically they are stealing money (research money) from the "evil" corprations.

      Now, I never said that big US drug manufcaturers are *smart* in that regard - since the generics companies obviously can't afford to pay for that research, just sell it to them cheap with the provision that the resultant product doesn't get sold in US.
      That way the both lose their "evil" image in front of commies like you AND earn more since they are getting paid by generic manufacturers who previously stole from them.

      But not doing so merely makes them less smart, not "evil". If YOU care so much about suffering people in India, YOU build a major drug company, do the research and then turn it over to generic manufacturers there.

      Let the modding down begin.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    6. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      You know, I think we basically agree. I'm not suggesting that the large multinational drugs companies shouldn't be allowed to make any profit, only that they should look beyond profits when necessary.

      How many patients in the developing world would be able to pay the kind of price that the large multinationals charge in the developed world? Next to none.

      So how exactly are they hurt when generic drugs manufacturers in India provide them with those medicines at a fraction of the cost? It's not like the generic drugs are being sold in competition with the patented versions is it?

      The generic drugs manufacturers aren't trying to muscle into the developed world - they don't try and sell their generic variants in those markets where the large multinationals prosper.

      Q: Why do the large multinationals go after the generic drugs manufacturers if they aren't hurting them? A: Because they can.

      And, that is what I call evil. Perhaps you disagree, but that's the way I see it.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the reasons have more to do with the availability of generic drugs over the internet. Whether or not the companies are pushing for a presence in developed countries more and more people are ordering generic drugs over the internet. IE. The majors are starting to loose money there.

      If we restrict the ability of companies to earn profits from doing research, then we will soon see fewer new drugs coming out, because there will be no profit incentive to do the research

    8. Re:Indian pharmaceutical industry's last stand? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      No. Given that they're in India, they'll probably be able to do research and development rather cheaply.
      So why aren't they doing it already?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  95. Kalam is a MUSLIM ! by xzap · · Score: 2, Informative

    which, as most people know, is different from HINDU. Hedoesnt belong to the BJP either...though his candidature was forwarded by the BJP. And he is no more for high tech military Indian Nationalism than Bush is for high tech military US Nationalism.

  96. Re:a new predication for armed conflict? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    #34. I will not turn into a snake. It never helps.

    Oh wait, that should be "I will not argue about moderation. It never helps."

  97. Indian President is head of state... by Microsift · · Score: 1

    not head of government, meaning he has some powers, but he doesn't write laws or set policy. If the Indian Prime Minister comes out in favor of OSS then let me know!

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  98. And that matters why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you stepped on your crank with golf shoes, or you're succumbed to the leftist joys of the racism of low expectations and victimization?

  99. Correction by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

    Either he had a bad hair day, or maybe he just simply overlooked it. Humans do make mistakes after-all. If every statement out of every mouth was carefully crafted and thoughtful, we wouldn't be in such a mess, now would we? Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I think he meant was India is country with an inexperienced (relative to US) software technology industry with potentially significant impacts to worldwide software progress.

    More to the matter, this not only applies to "poor" countries, it applies here. The majority, and I do mean larger than 50%, of those working in IT and software development, are influenced by the behemoth with a bigger buck. Yaya, there is a growing trend to put Linux in and blah blah blah. Evidence suggests that MS is a very large company with lots of money and power. Wonder if there's any impact to people considering a career in technology.

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  100. Fix your political system first by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    India's not a poor country, it's just a really, really corrupt one.

    It's a tough choice, I know, between the ideologically bankrupt and wholly corrupt Congress party and the racists in the BJP and their above-the-law backers like Thackarey and his thugs.

    When you guys get that sorted even reasonably well, we'll be willing to listen to criticism from you.

    1. Re:Fix your political system first by nathanh · · Score: 1

      India's not a poor country, it's just a really, really corrupt one.

      ...

      When you guys get that sorted even reasonably well, we'll be willing to listen to criticism from you.

      Yeah, that sounds about right. You (an American) can openly criticise the Indian government but then you won't even listen to criticism about your own country.

      What amazes me even more than your unabashed arrogance is that so few yanks will recognise the hypocrisy, even when it's pointed out to them.

    2. Re:Fix your political system first by JDevers · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a citizen of the US and I think our system of government is completely corrupt, I listen to other people's complaints about our government (I am a graduate student at a very culturally diverse university, so I know a LOT of people who are in the states only for an education) and generally agree.

      What amazes me most is that people from other countries see the media representation of this country and assume EVERYONE feels that way. While it may be the majority attitude in some places, it isn't the only attitude or even a very dominate one. Most of the people in this country that don't listen to criticism about our government are the same who's life ambition is to be on the Jerry Springer show. In other words, pretty much the bottom 5%, but also sometimes the most vocal 5%.

    3. Re:Fix your political system first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks who's talking

      your president was "elected" because, in a state where is brother is the governor, he could get officials to throw ballot boxes out of the window and rig the election in his favour.

    4. Re:Fix your political system first by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whatever the political problems the US has they are miniscule in comparison to the problems in India.

      As an example, the Indian parliament rejected a measure requiring MPs to disclose criminal history; they almost passed a disclosure requirement for "serious" crimes like robbery, rape, homicide, but then rejected that too!

      The BJP is racist and is openly supported by Hindu nationalists that publicly incite riot and have been responsible for hundreds of deaths of Muslims.

      Taking criticism of the US political system from Indians is like taking tolerance classes from the Nazi party. If you can't clean your own house, what gives you the moral authority to criticize the American political system? Some supernational sense of poltical correctness?

      Give me a break.

    5. Re:Fix your political system first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot, meet Kettle. Kettle, Pot.

    6. Re:Fix your political system first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Since you seem to know more than the average
      american about the BJP *and* you've brought
      in a reference to "hundreds of deaths of Muslims,"
      it's quite apparent what you really are.

      What the fsck are you doing out of Paki-land?

    7. Re:Fix your political system first by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 0, Troll

      You are an idiot. Why don't you mention how the Democrats drove vans around gathering up homeless people with promises of buying them cigarettes to vote for Gore? What about illegal aliens casting votes for Gore? What about the (Democratic Party controlled) judicial system in Florida that kept on changing their definitions of what constituted a cast vote? Our President was elected fairly based upon the requirements of the Constitution. If the Democratic Party didn't like the Electoral College so much, they should've put forth a serious Constitutional Amendment to abolish the Electoral College during their 50 year *reign* in Congress. But they didn't. The last time there was a laughable attempt at putting forth such a Constitutional Amendment was back in 1976, during the previously mentioned *reign* of the Democrats. It failed miserably. So if you are going to critique American politics, you might want to actually learn about the mechanics of our government first instead of aping what is fashionable in the ill-informed European press...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    8. Re:Fix your political system first by flyingdisc · · Score: 1
      When you guys get that sorted even reasonably well, we'll be willing to listen to criticism from you.

      Totally flabbergasted by this. Where the hell does that come from? There are ongoing problems in all countries. It's your arrogance to assume that 'THEY' are obviously inferior than you that is truely breath taking.

      I've no particular problem with any country but attitudes like that really get my back up. No wonder the US has a bad attitude abroad if your opinion is the one they hear.

    9. Re:Fix your political system first by maxpublic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can't clean your own house, what gives you the moral authority to criticize the American political system?

      As an American I guess I could respond to this with 'the First Amendment', but then you'd probably claim that basic rights like 'freedom of speech' only apply to U.S. citizens.

      And really - talk about cleaning your own house. My government started a war over WMD and terrorism, against a nation which has no WMD and wasn't even remotely involved in 9/11, simply to steal that country's oil while proving that Shrub has a bigger dick than Saddam. You want to talk corrupt? Take a look at who's been awarded the multi-billion 'rebuilding' contracts and control over the oil - note how they're directly connected to both Shrub and mini-Shrub.

      I'd say corruption is alive and well here in America, and reaches right up to the top levels of government. What are you going to do now? Claim that *I* don't have the 'moral authority' to criticize the government either?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    10. Re:Fix your political system first by tuba_dude · · Score: 1
      Hold on there bub... If you're gonna bash properly, you've got to bash the whole system, not just the half that doesn't include you. Observe:

      R: TAX CUTS, GET YOUR TAX CUTS!
      Hey there little Jimmy, did you scrape your knee? Have a tax cut! Oh look, there's little Mohammad. Hey buddy, your daddy's a terrorist, so we're gonna arrest him. No, sorry, we don't have any evidence, but that doesn't mean anything! Don't worry, we'll bomb your family in...(Quick Jones, what's a middle-eastern country?)

      D: LET THE GOVERNMENT TAKE CARE OF YOU!
      Good morning little Emily. Did your balloon pop? I'm sorry, let's set up a new government agency to fix that. This way we can also give Illegal Alien Juan and Convicted Felon Bob jobs to help you!

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    11. Re:Fix your political system first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that sounds about right. You (an American) can openly criticise the Indian government but then you won't even listen to criticism about your own country.

      I've lived in both U.S. and India. When I come back to the states after visiting India I am so happy I am no longer living there. Every problem that the U.S. has is ten times worse in India.

      BTW You are expected to criticise to U.S even if you live here. It's citizens can openly and publicly criticise the government. Go ahead and criticise, chances are, U.S. many citizens will agree. There are some serious issues with this country. I have big problems with the government.

      The U.S. isn't the greatest country, but I certainly feel its a better place to live than some countries (e.g. India).

    12. Re:Fix your political system first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, you disagree with him. Nobody who disagrees with him has the moral authority to criticize him! duh.

    13. Re:Fix your political system first by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      Tuba Dude, I only singled out the Dems because that is who the previous poster was siding with. I personally felt Bush should've stepped aside after losing the popular vote and then set back, campaigned to abolish the Electoral College, and then returned in 2004 with a landslide election victory. But that didn't happen. I just like to point out that the Dems had 50 years where they could've taken a stand and abolished the Electoral College before we ever got to the unnecessary election crisis of 2000, but they didn't. Its a shame it always takes an emergency to get the U.S. to do anything... Civil War, Pearl Harbor, 9-11, etc.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    14. Re:Fix your political system first by rsklnkv · · Score: 1

      Nicely said. You must be an 'Evil One' (tm) to talk like that:|

      --
      _____ "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- Orwell
    15. Re:Fix your political system first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the First Amendment "applies" to everyone, but isn't it only "guaranteed" to US citizens by the First Amendment, while it does not guarantee the same rights to some, in say, Belize?

    16. Re:Fix your political system first by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      My posting shouldn't have been modded down as a troll. I gave useful information on the last time there was any attempt at a Constitutional Amendment to abolish the Electoral College. I was surprised when nobody (Ross Perot?) picked up the mantle in 2000 over this issue...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    17. Re:Fix your political system first by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "...you'd probably claim that basic rights like 'freedom of speech' only apply to U.S. citizens"

      Why would you need to be a US citizen to have freedom of speech? Surely the constition applies to everyone living in America, regardless of whether they've chosen to become "citizens of the federal government", or simply citizens of the country (state) in which they happen to live?

      Naturally, some people will want it pointed out that the US is not alone in guaranteeing free speech, for example the following applies to all 13? countries in the European union:

      "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. this right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information an ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."

    18. Re:Fix your political system first by loquitus · · Score: 1

      Just how are the BJP racists?

    19. Re:Fix your political system first by loquitus · · Score: 1

      You know something... you're probably right. Indians certainly don't have the right to complain about American democracy, because American democracy is actually quite respectable in my Canuck opinion... Of course, let's conveniently ignore that the wrong man is in the White House right now, despite this glorious democratic system, but I digress. On a tangent, and quite frankly, what difference does it make, how screwed up a country might be? What is annoying about the US is their desire to get into the business of other countries... have they ever heard of the term "mind you own freaking business"?

    20. Re:Fix your political system first by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      don't forget that the BJP also persecutes Christians (all denominations). They aren't happy that the Roman Catholic Church has the intention of converting all 300 million of the *untouchables* caste because the Hindus believe the untouchables were ordained into their misery by their previous existence...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    21. Re:Fix your political system first by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...but in France, that freedom of speech is only guaranteed if it is spoken in French... Now to me, if the European Union is serious about European Unity, that all the countries must have the same basic laws and currency, shouldn't they all speak the same language? English perhaps? I wish the British would just adopt the Euro and then the tabloids could campaign for everyone in the country to call it the Euro-Pound... Or the *Sterlo* (sterling/sterile euro??)...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    22. Re:Fix your political system first by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      India's not a poor country, it's just a really, really corrupt one.

      Read what you wrote, but substitute "America" for "India".

      When you guys get that sorted even reasonably well, we'll be willing to listen to criticism from you.

      Sadly, yours is an all-to-typical attitude. Do I need to point out that the argument is fallacious?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    23. Re:Fix your political system first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you claiming Australia's government is less corrupt than Americas? Or are you claiming that you recognize hypocrisy?

    24. Re:Fix your political system first by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

      Sorry, couldn't bite my tongue any longer.

      As an American I guess I could respond to this with 'the First Amendment', but then you'd probably claim that basic rights like 'freedom of speech' only apply to U.S. citizens.
      The first ammendment only applies to U.S. citizens and, unfortunately, is not considered a basic right globally.

      My government started a war over WMD and terrorism, against a nation which has no WMD and wasn't even remotely involved in 9/11, simply to steal that country's oil while proving that Shrub has a bigger dick than Saddam.
      Wow, talk about someone wearing the proverbial blinders. Been watching the nightly news? I guess so. Did you forget about, or just never even knew about, the fact that one of Saddam's sons gassed an entire city? Thousands of people died from what is classified as a WMD. These were Iraqi people. The U.S. were certainly afraid he would use these chemicals against the American attackers and for good reason. He has them and is not afraid of using them. If you had a dozen years, a desert, and a multi billion dollar budget, do you think you could hide a few thousand gallons of chemicals? Should be pretty easy to hide a few thousand barrels in a country twice the size of Idaho or about 437,072 sq km. Oh, and not "even remotely involved?" The money trail goes through Baghdad. The attacks appear to have had partial funding from Iraq.

      Shrub and mini-Shrub
      Ad hominem attacks. Wow, I'm impressed. If it really was about the oil, then why don't we take over a country like Saudi Arabia where we already have a huge military force installed and a larger supply of oil? It would be very easy to stage a coup there and turn it into a puppet state, supplying all the oil we need at cheap prices.

      No, you don't have the moral authority as is evidenced by your post, but you do have the basic right as granted by the Bill of Rights. That Bill of Rights is one of this countries greatest strengths as well as one of its greatest weakness, but I would much rather have it than the alternative. We are spoiled here.

      --
      My name fits again.
    25. Re:Fix your political system first by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      Ah, I understand. My apologies. Mistakes all about in the political system. Shit happens, politicians sweep it under the rug, everyone forgets about it until it smells bad, then we repeat.

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
  101. Giving your software away hardly means bankruptcy by tjwhaynes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where I disagree with you is on piracy. I think the operating system should be free, programming languages should be free and that's it. The point of a free operating system is to foster a competitive environment. Companies still need assurances that they can write software without giving it away.

    So you think that all software developed, excepting OS-level stuff, should be proprietary? That seems a little harsh. Would you really like to remove the right of people to give their work away? A vast collection of software is available today because people have chosen to work on something in their spare time and distribute it, mostly because it worked for them and someone else might benefit as well.

    And is the point of a free operating system to foster a competitive environment? I view it as a side effect not the reason.

    Even if it comes to a point where you can't make money writing software, people are always going to want someone/some company to help them use it, implement it or merely document it. There will always be opportunities for making money with software. You just might find selling it tough. I don't think that hurts the software industry one iota - people will end up paying for the most competitive system implemented in the most effective and useful fashion. Companies who build the expertise to make such installations will be the ones who will stand to make the most money in such an economy. Finally we might see a software economy where the talents and knowledge of the companies employees are the real financial capital rather than the number of patents you hold.

    Cheers,
    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  102. Slashdot moderators have combined IQ of 300 by jkrise · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Excuse me, but can someone explain how the parent post is modded 5 Funny? I guess the moderators are just stupid, or totally incompetent or both. How many moderators can name the capital of India?

    How many know that India has their own satellite launch systems? Their own aerospace and research firms? Their own nuclear reactors, scientists and so forth? How many know that the current president, before his assignment, was the top scientific advisor to the Cabinet?

    I recall the debate in Slashdot reg Munich being the capital of Germany, and shooting aero-baloons with guns. Time to moderate the moderators, surely!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Slashdot moderators have combined IQ of 300 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Excuse me, but can someone explain how the parent post is modded 5 Funny?
      Because "well, it's not rocket science" or "he's no rocket scientist" are well-known phrases meaning "it's not hard at all" and "he's thick" respectively. So when you look for proofs of someone's intelligence, to actually be able to say "he's a rocket scientist" is funny, because it's taking a tired cliche literally and then reversing it. It's like the joke: the "For Dummies..." series released "Neuropathology For Dummies", the only title in the series that couldn't claim "at least it's not brain surgery".
    2. Re:Slashdot moderators have combined IQ of 300 by rawdot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Time to moderate the moderators, surely!

      As seen on http://slashdot.org/: Have you Meta Moderated recently?

  103. I don't trust the US by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Expose on US fascism. They may not be Muslim fanatics, but they are religious fanatics.

    The US should abandon nuclear weapons and ICBMs.
    The US should stop tolerating pograms (sic) against minorities.
    The US should address their grievous repression of "lower castes" (ie, people from poorer backgrounds).
    The US should respect the Geneva Convention and other human rights in Camp X-Ray, as specified by most of the world.

    Maybe if they addressed these, we could take US policy seriously.

    It works both ways doesn't it?

    Seriously, before you start deciding which governments around the world are OK and which aren't, perhaps you should pay more attention to your own goverment and your own society.

    If the Founding Fathers were alive today, they'd be appalled at how their vision of a free and egalitarian society has been corrupted.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:I don't trust the US by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      ...yeah, sure they would. They'd be mad we freed the slaves and gave the right to vote (not to mention drive automobiles!) to women...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    2. Re:I don't trust the US by eniu!uine · · Score: 1

      The US should abandon nuclear weapons and ICBMs.

      And I suppose everyone else will follow suit?

      The US should stop tolerating pograms (sic) against minorities.

      What the hell is a pogram? If you mean program I'd ask what minorities you are talking about. Perhaps the minority of people who are from contries who are typically indoctrinated to believe that we should all die? I think they bear a little watching. If you're talking about some other program, you're sadly mistaken. Racism doesn't fly here anymore... at least not government sponsered racism.

      The US should address their grievous oppression of "lower castes" (i.e. people from poorer backgrounds).

      It's a capitalist society. If you're poor, you're poor. It's not oppression. Show me the country that has no poor.

      The US should respect the Geneva Convention and other human rights in Camp X-Ray as specified by most of the world.

      It's a prison. It's not a resort. In a regular prison if you act up you get thrown in the hole(solitary). In x-ray you get a blindfold. So what? I'd rather have the blindfold.

      The US has many problems, and perhaps something could be done about the poverty situation here(as anywhere), but if the founding fathers were alive today they would be disgusted at many things, probably none of which are on your list.

    3. Re:I don't trust the US by Networkpro · · Score: 1

      I guess if your thoughts become prevelent where you live then you can expect a vacation crowd of US Army, Air Force and Marines. Other than being particlarly agregious flame-troll bait you need to be clear on your facts before being culled out of the herd as potential ground beef: Should Abandon XXX. Why ? nothing says be nice and play right better than slagging a city...just ask the Japanese. Should XXX, and XXX. Learn the rules before you try and play the game. Its a meritocracy in American society, contribute play by the rules and suceed; otherwise back into the slime pool. Should respect Geneva Convention. We do for uniformed combatants. Unconventional organizations like criminals and terrorists are handled based upon where they are apprehended and detained. The problem is the rest of the world doesn't take the US seriously until we have to remind them who wears the pants.

    4. Re:I don't trust the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that pogrom was the intended word.

    5. Re:I don't trust the US by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      First of all, look at what the original poster said and then look at my reply. Try to take what I said in context, not out of it.

      The US should abandon nuclear weapons and ICBMs.

      And I suppose everyone else will follow suit?


      The original poster suggested that India should unilaterally disarm. Why doesn't he suggest that the US should do the same?

      The US should stop tolerating pograms (sic) against minorities.

      What the hell is a pogram? If you mean program I'd ask what minorities you are talking about. Perhaps the minority of people who are from contries who are typically indoctrinated to believe that we should all die? I think they bear a little watching. If you're talking about some other program, you're sadly mistaken. Racism doesn't fly here anymore... at least not government sponsered racism.


      The spelling "pograms" was there in the original post. I suggest you look up what "sic" means. Seriously, go do that.

      Racism doesn't fly in the US anymore? Really? Is that why Native Americans are still having to fight for some of the basic rights that they've been promised?

      Ever heard of the Washington Redskins? Isn't Redskin a racist term? Are NFL teams exempt from being racist? If so, why don't we see any NFL franchises called the Niggers, the Dagos or the Wops?

      No racism in American society? Yeah, right.

      The US should address their grievous oppression of "lower castes" (i.e. people from poorer backgrounds).

      It's a capitalist society. If you're poor, you're poor. It's not oppression. Show me the country that has no poor.


      In most western societies, being poor isn't as crippling a disadvantage as it is in the US. Being poor in the US means that you can practically kiss your chances of getting a decent education out of the window, and that your chances of getting anything but basic health care is near zero.

      From a poor background but want to go to university? Or need a heart transplant? Well, you better hope that you don't live in the US, because if you do then you're shit out of luck.

      (You may not call this oppression, but I'm guessing that you're not poor, so how would you know if people at the bottom of society feel oppressed or not? Besides, the original poster talked about caste systems, as if they were condoned by the Indian government rather than being illegal, and my point was meant to illustrate that the US has its own caste system, albeit one that's not as visible to some people.)

      The US should respect the Geneva Convention and other human rights in Camp X-Ray as specified by most of the world.

      It's a prison. It's not a resort. In a regular prison if you act up you get thrown in the hole(solitary). In x-ray you get a blindfold. So what? I'd rather have the blindfold.


      Seriously, do you think that a blindfold is as heavy as it gets at Camp X-Ray? Don't you think that people are being tortured there?

      Let's not forget the hundreds of others across the US who have been imprisoned without charge, legal representation or even the right to call their families, since September 11th. Why is it OK to do this without presenting any evidence of wrongdoing? If you won't stand up for their rights, who do you suppose will stand up for yours when they knock on your door?

      Need anything else clarified?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    6. Re:I don't trust the US by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1
      What the hell is a pogram? If you mean program I'd ask what minorities you are talking about. Perhaps the minority of people who are from contries who are typically indoctrinated to believe that we should all die? I think they bear a little watching. If you're talking about some other program, you're sadly mistaken. Racism doesn't fly here anymore... at least not government sponsered racism.

      I think the parent-parent-parent poster meant pogrom.
      From WordNet (r) 1.7:
      pogrom
      n : organized persecution of an ethnic group (especially Jews)

      What about the replacing of the words french, france, with "Freedom"? That seems to fit the description of a pogrom. And the Government was involved with that. Freedom fries, blah.

      It's a capitalist society. If you're poor, you're poor. It's not oppression. Show me the country that has no poor.

      No, it is not oppression to be poor. It is however oppression to do not nice things to the poor. There are countries with less poor, however...

      It's a prison. It's not a resort. In a regular prison if you act up you get thrown in the hole(solitary). In x-ray you get a blindfold. So what? I'd rather have the blindfold

      The US prison system is nothing to be proud of.

      I think the parent-parent poster meant that India has many of the same problems that we do. Weather that is true or not I do not know, but it is an interesting point.

    7. Re:I don't trust the US by eniu!uine · · Score: 1

      I hate to have to cut and paste all day, so I'll just reply in one chunk. Talking about the Washington Redskins in reference to racism confuses organized racism with lack of conformity to political correctness. Segregation(done away with) was racism. There are undercurrents of racism still in the US, but they are just that.. undercurrents. Actually your example of lack of education for the poor in this country was an ironic one. Ask anyone(such as myself) who has applied for Pell grants whether it is easier to get them if they are rich or poor. As for the public school system, man it sucks, but it's still better than anything you'll find in most 'developing' nations. Also at issue is healthcare which in my state is quite good if you have no money. Oregon health plan provided well for my wife and child until she got a job. Although I probably don't make nearly as much as the IT professionals around here, I don't consider myself poor. I did, however, have to eat my share of government cheese when I was growing up, and there are considerable mechanisms in place to help poor people. These include childcare benefits, healthcare, access foodshare, foodstamps, and general assistance/unemployment. These mechanisms have suffered recently due to a lack of funding(should have passed the open source initiative, I wrote my rep) but I haven't seen the distended starvation bellies of third world contries here yet. As far as camp x-ray goes, I did a little google on it before I answered your first post and blindfold was the worst I saw. Until I see evidence of torture I have no reason to believe it is happening. As for the patriot act, I agree with you completely. Noone should be held indefinately without access to legal councel. I think your clarifications were quite enough and I appreciate the new word. I had no idea what a pogrom was.

    8. Re:I don't trust the US by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      As far as camp x-ray goes, I did a little google on it before I answered your first post and blindfold was the worst I saw. Until I see evidence of torture I have no reason to believe it is happening.

      How else do you think that the US is extracting information from the detainees? Asking nicely?

      If you really do believe that human rights aren't being abused at Camp X-Ray then you're either pretty naive, pretty stupid or both. There are no so blind as those that will not see.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    9. Re:I don't trust the US by eniu!uine · · Score: 1

      How else do you think that the US is extracting information from the detainees? Asking nicely?

      If the fact that they are detained is enough to assume they are being tortured, how is this different than anytime another country detains someone? Further, there has been no evidence that the US has 'extracted' any useful information from them anyway. The most valuable info so far seems to have been gathered from echelon.

      If you really do believe that human rights aren't being abused at Camp X-Ray then you're either pretty naive, pretty stupid, or both. There are no so blind as those that will not see.

      No, seriously.. tell me how you really feel. I'm sorry, but the US torturing people who know nothing under the watchful eye of the entire world seems a little far fetched to me. I will, however, believe it if sufficient evidence is provided.

    10. Re:I don't trust the US by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      If your own government won't come out and flatly deny that human rights abuses are going on in Camp X-Ray what does that suggest to you? If the detainees there are being treated humanely, why aren't observers from Amnesty International or other civil rights groups even allowed to observe the conditions in which their being kept? Why don't the detainees have the right to independant legal counsel?

      And, perhaps most damning at all, why are children, some as young as 12, being held there?

      Somehow, you trust the US government to be open and honest about its military operations. Is that why nobody's being investigated for any of the multitude of incidents in which US military personnel opened fire upon Iraqi civilians in this latest war? Or why friendly fire incidents aren't properly investigated, the offending personnel aren't even named let alone publicly asked to account for their actions and related camera footage from their aircraft gets "lost"?

      Open your eyes man. Look further than Fox News and CNN. Do some research of your own. Find out exactly what's going on in your name.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  104. Can't afford MS anyway by nomadicGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nothing earth shattering here. Free software is a necessity in such a poor country. The cost of Windows XP and a copy of Office XP would wipe out about one third of the average person's annual income.

    From the CIA World Factbook 2002 edition...

    India:
    GDP per capita: $2,540
    Population below poverty line: 25%
    Unemployment rate: 8.8%
    Internet service providers: 43
    Internet users: 7 million

    True that there are over a billion people in India but the vast majority are involved in agriculture, are uneducated, and most likely will never be able to afford a computer. Its not like this is a major blow to MS.

    From a government standpoint, India is much better off using free software and saving money for public health and other more pressing issues.

    1. Re:Can't afford MS anyway by 1s44c · · Score: 1


      That may be partly true, but only partly. India isn't one big slum from end to end.

      Why should any inteligent people be happy sending truckloads of money out of the country?

      India has good programmers, lots of cheap, good, programmers. Perhaps the president knows that you can't build a good house ( software ) on rubbish foundations ( the OS ).

    2. Re:Can't afford MS anyway by nomadicGeek · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I insulted. That wasn't the intention.

      I guess one problem that I do see is that India does need to have a lot of people who are proficient with proprietary solutions from MS, Oracle, PeopleSoft, SAP, etc. A large part of their tech economy is involved in providing outsourced development and integration services to companies that want to take advantage of the cheap labor.

  105. Chomsky on non-US nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.ucalgary.ca/~gharris/

    On the Mideast

    The most critical part of the Third World ... I think remains today the Middle East, for the very simple reason that it's the locus of the world's major energy supplies for as far ahead as anybody can see. Hence, it was considered to be, and is still considered to be, of particular importance that the first beneficiaries of that wealth are not the people of the region; rather the resources must be under effective U.S. control; they must be accessible to the industrial world on terms that the United States leadership can see is appropriate and, crucially, the huge profits that are generated must flow primarily to the United States, secondarily to its British junior partner, to borrow the term used by the British Foreign Office, rather ruefully, to describe its new role in the post Second World War era. This is done in various ways. In part it's recycled by local managers who have to be dependent on the global rulers, a long story which continues.

    Well quite naturally these arrangements breed continual conflict. Internal U.S. documents describe them in the conventional way. The conflicts are conflicts with radical nationalism, radical Arab nationalism that threatens U.S. dominance. For the public it's put a little differently, varying over time. These days it's international terrorism, or the clash of civilization; tomorrow it will be something new, but it's basically the same ones all the time. The question is, who's going to be the first beneficiaries of the region's resources? These conflicts are likely to become more virulent and ominous in the coming years, at least if the analysis and projection of quite a number of geologists are anywhere near accurate.

    1. Re:Chomsky on non-US nationalism by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

      Okay, I see your point, and to a good extent I agree with you. To the extent that Indian Nationalism means pursuing economic independence from the West - Linux, obviously, could play a big role in this - I agree with you totally, and President Kalam deserves our congratulations for his efforts toward that goal.

      To the extent that Indian Nationalism (which I sometimes call Hindu Nationalism in my post above, which is particularly a misnomer given this particular proponent of Indian Nationalism is a Muslim,) means the proliferation of nuclear weapons in India, or the advancement of ultrarightists in India, who are fond of nationalist ideology, I am opposed to it.

      Another quote from the President:
      "Unless India stands up to the world, no one will respect us. In this world, fear has no place. Only strength respects strength."

      I don't think he's talking about self sufficiency in pharmaceuticals here.

      On the one hand, given what has happened in Iraq, it is difficult to criticize such a position. On the other hand, this strain of political thought leads to nuclear proliferation, particularly in President Kalam's case, which constitutes a direct threat to our survival as a species.

      P.S. I know who this man is for two reasons. Firstly, I read about him in the article from the Indian Communist Party, which I linked to, some time ago. Secondly, I have his book of poetry, which is part of my collection of poetry by fellow scientists. The title is Yenudaya Prayana and I recommend it, although it can be a little frightening coming from a political leader.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  106. No by Microsift · · Score: 1

    There is no equivalent in India.

    The President of the U.S. is Head of State, and Head of Government. The President of India is Head of State, the Indian PM is Head of Government.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  107. Paid oss development. by alyosha1 · · Score: 1

    I get paid to develop open source software. Check out my medical imaging library here.

    One benefit of working in academia - information sharing has always been a key part of the academic tradition, what with peer reviewed papers and so on, and so open source/free software is a very good philosophical fit. At least that's my opinion - there are others that are more interested in the potential profit to be earned from research endeavours than I am.

  108. Re:Interesting for India's - and the world's - fut by deathmolor · · Score: 1

    Ok you don't want to say it. So I will.

    Bill is a bad person. His army of thugs, which we will call lets say lawyers for lack of a better word, should be pushed out of the way.

    Open source is the only way to do that. This is why they are running scared right now. Every action taken by Microsoft in the last year is a systematic assault on the very fabric of the open source movement. He believes open source should be kept marginalized. Ever since the day in 1975 when he stood up in a convention and called scientists and programmers pirates for sharing source. It was natural for us to believe these things should be shared but Bill never believed in that, for him it was all about the money. Right now that belief is naturally crumbling because open source is the only thing that ever made sense. Bill is trying to convince the business world that innovation comes from his closed source and licensing.

    There is a reason why Windows seems to be standing still right now when open source is doing the real innovation. Windows owes its existence to open source.

    DOS = Derived from CBM OS clone source, which was made available to Microsoft due to the sharing of source, they then later purchased that source.

    Windows = derived from the work being done by Xerox (the pivotal stance of Microsoft in the Apple vs. Microsoft case) and universities all over the world. Which was all done with Unix systems I might add and the word Window was coined.

    If all new innovation goes straight to open source it will mean in very short time Microsoft will appear to be standing still. Not to just the academic world but also to the businesses world as well. This is already starting to happen. This is way open source is believed to be the biggest threat to Microsoft to date.

    Bill get out of the way.

    Sorry for the history lesson most of you already know this but I just couldn't hold back the comment.

  109. No Better by mobileskimo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WE designed and DEPLOYED the first nukes on Japan. WE still pump the most funds into designing NEW ways to kill people. How are we any better? How are we in a position to criticize someone else?

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
    1. Re:No Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Someday, when you're older, you'll begin to understand there are shades of gray ... reasons for things. Unlike computers, the real world is not binary.

      Read some information about the WWII nukes from different sources (at least one for and one against). The "against" should be easy to find. Try to understand the political, economic, and humanitarian needs for using those nukes. Just because you understand those reasons doesn't force you to agree with the action itself. But it is very important to fully understand the rationale before you loudly pronounce that the US must sit silent in every situation for which a protestor can make some charge.

      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997

    2. Re:No Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are we any better?

      Ummm... because we're not fascist pigs?

    3. Re:No Better by kylef · · Score: 2, Insightful
      WE still pump the most funds into designing NEW ways to kill people. How are we any better?

      The US is better because these new ways to kill people are better ways to kill people, ways that inflict less "collateral" damage than at any time in the history of the world. GPS guidance, terrain contour mapping, infrared signature targeting: all of these are funded because they make weapons more lethal to those being targeted, not innocent bystanders. And in some cases, these new weapons don't even kill people! (Check out the U.S. Army's new various non-lethal weapons technology here.)

      No matter what you say, improving weapons is a noble goal, because force is still regrettably necessary to maintain some semblance of order and security in this world, and crude force is becoming altogether intolerable now that media attention makes even small conflicts front-page news around the globe. New weapons must be more precise than ever before, and must do their jobs more reliably and thoroughly than ever before.

      Investing money into gross tonnage nuclear bombs with dirty radioactive residue and crude delivery vehicles is the OPPOSITE of the US plan. Attempts by non-superpower countries to create strategic nuclear weapons are completely illogical on several levels. Most importantly, it shows that such countries do not understand the prerequisite for strategic deterrence and its stabilizing corollary, Mutually Assured Destruction: only balanced nuclear arsenals are MAD-deterred. The crude nuclear weapons under construction throughout the world today are not strategic in nature (yet), because they lack delivery vehicles. The only thing they have succeeded to accomplish is destabilizing the world's nuclear balance, and creating incentive for the world's remaining superpower to actually deploy a missile shield system!

      If you want to "win" in today's world, win with your economy, not strategic weapons. Don't waste your time and national resources developing weapons that won't be used and have no strategic deterrence value. President Kalam seems to understand this now, which is why I think he is advocating technology education and has great concern for students in India. I hope his message is heeded.

    4. Re:No Better by the_machine · · Score: 1
      WE still pump the most funds into designing NEW ways to kill people.


      And look how good we are at it. :)

    5. Re:No Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unsurprisingly, Bin Laden used very similar words in justifying the WTC attacks. Just change "nukes" to "airplanes" where adequate.

      You're trying to justify mass murder and make it look ultimately humanitarian. That's what all the hopeless despots in the world do.

    6. Re:No Better by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      > No matter what you say, improving weapons is a
      > noble goal

      Yeah right, until you are at the receiving end of such weapons.

      So the new weapons make war a possibility again, right? and that is noble?

      Which one is best: huge weapons that kill lots of people that are so bad that they can't be used (strategic nukes) or little weapons that kill the people you want only -- mostly, so they can be used (so called smart bombs)?

      with the former no one gets killed, with the latter lots do get killed, including some innocents. I find your reasoning higly dubious.

      The US weapons program is not being developed with humanistic goals in mind. It is developed so that the US can continue to wage war against less powerful opponents with minimal bad press. The question of whether such wars are justified or not is never addressed.

      Now to fight against such weapons the ennemy has no choice but to fight dirty. Remember this next time a tower crumbles because maybe you will be a victim of the collateral damage.

    7. Re:No Better by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

      Someday, when you're older, you'll begin to understand there are shades of gray ... reasons for things. Unlike computers, the real world is not binary.

      I understand the shades of gray quite well. And the motivation (your reasons) that is built apon complex layers of these shades. I suppose it was expected that someone would patronize the rather simplistic nature of my post. I did so with the intention of providing some insight to the audience how shades of gray and hidden reasons betray personal agendas of politicians that work at cross-purposes to the agendas of humanity. Any religion you study or follow will teach that retaliation or threat of retaliation is not the tool towards peace. I concur, the world indeed is not binary, nor black and white, nor good and evil, nor right and wrong. This cliche is not suitable for /. consumption.

      Read some information about the WWII nukes from different sources (at least one for and one against). The "against" should be easy to find. Try to understand the political, economic, and humanitarian needs for using those nukes.

      Perhaps I might suggest you try to understand the human desires that necessitate using politics and economics in the name of humanitarian efforts.

      Just because you understand those reasons doesn't force you to agree with the action itself. But it is very important to fully understand the rationale before you loudly pronounce that the US must sit silent in every situation for which a protestor can make some charge.

      I suppose this is good advice, incase I need to defend the opinion that one human's intent on killing another is wrong, a belief that is innate among all those who participate and attempt to socially engage in a mutual world. You speak as if the "US" is an entity or person. Remember that the "US" is a collection of individual people that have several common attributes that identify. Examine carefully what those attributes are and perhaps you will get to the bottom of what is referenced in the first paragraph above. I don't proclaim that I or he or anyone is better. Let me re-iterate this.

      I simply imply that nobody is better to judge another.

      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997

      --
      "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  110. beta?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    have you guys ever heard of a test platform?

    open source at its finest!!

  111. A little background on Abdul Kalam by jazuki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A P J Abdul Kalam led the nuclear weapons program in India prior to being tapped to be titular head of state as President. (Note that the President of India is largely a ceremonial post, like the Queen of England. However, it does offer a bit more of a bully pulpit. As in England, the head of government is the Prime Minister.)

    When India tested its first nuclear weapons (both fission and fusion), Abdul Kalam crowed with pride about how it was an indigenous effort. And this was largely true: They figured out, based on published materials, and with some Russian help and some reverse-engineering, how to build the facilities to generate weapons-grade uranium and plutonium and make heavy water, and constructed the facilities themselves, the latter with very little outside help. This was because they didn't want to be dependent on anyone else for such a critical national security matter.

    It's about India being master of her own destiny.

    So, it must really grate on Abdul Kalam that so much of software developmetn work in India is focussed on proprietary, and externally controlled, technologies. For him, the OSS model offers a perfect way out, sharing with the rest of the world, but leaving no chance that the rug can be pulled away without India's acceptance.

    That said, all he has is the bully pulpit. Hopefully, he will be able to get some of the relevant people, whether in the universities or in government, to listen and take the issue seriously.

  112. Re:Giving your software away hardly means bankrupt by SunPin · · Score: 1

    Of course we will have a better industry if it defines itself through its employees but only major league sports have been able to pull that off.

    The competitive environment must be reason number one for a free operating system. On the desktop, there is no genuine competitive market. Does anyone honestly believe that Microsoft Office is worth $300 or more?

    My view is more along the lines of print publishing. Nothing prevents you from using it or seeing how it's done. There's nothing proprietary about it but if I write something, you aren't allowed to rearrange the ideas or the words if I don't grant that right. There is nothing harsh about that concept. The harsh part comes from the Linux community alienating the people with the power to speed things along.

    You might not like it and I might not like it but money makes things happen. You cannot tell companies that OSS is a good idea but they will have to abandon everything they understand in order to benefit from it.

    Companies need assurances that they can write software without giving it away. That doesn't remove your right to give software away. That doesn't remove your rights in any capacity. The idea simply allows companies to keep their rights intact as well.

    Which company needs a lesson on competition besides Microsoft? Remove their power from the equation, use capitalism instead of fascism and good things will happen for everybody.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  113. My reaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My reaction was, "Wow! There are actually world leaders who regularly employ words over five syllables, and might be able to distinguish between my arse and their foot." Seems India didn't make the mistake the USA did and actually elected a thoughtful man with the intelligence to lead and not merely the guts to paint target on citizens' collective backs. Shame that the US of A doesn't afford us a chance to field a candidate with fortitude tempered by intellect and compassion, but leaves us with prevaricating weasels with diety complexes for whom to vote.

  114. Some facts about our President by mritunjai · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. Indian president is not elected directly, but indirectly by elected representatives.

    2. Current president Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam is an exception. While previous presidents were just symbolic heads as dictated by constitution, Dr Kalam has actually taken steps to bridge the communication gaps, meeting publically and raising his opinions on matters... to much discomfort of the dirty politicians.

    3. Dr. Kalam meets hundreds of school children daily. His vision is to bring about awareness in current generation and imbibe a scientic vision in them. He encourages them to question the things around them.

    4. Dr. Kalam has been very supportive of humanitarian work. His team developed an ultra-light carbon composite for heat shields of ICBM Agni missile. Working with a doctor, Dr Kalam made available that material for making artificial limbs of physically challanged children. An artifical leg for children which used to weigh 3.5 KG (7 pounds) now weights 300 grams (less than 1 pound). Dr Kalam lists this achievement in his 3 life time achievements above all nuclear and missile stuff !!

    5. He has written two books which are one of its kind. You have to read them to believe them!

    --
    - mritunjai
    1. Re:Some facts about our President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >5. He has written two books which are one of its kind. You have to read them to believe them!

      I don't beleive it!

    2. Re:Some facts about our President by Jordy · · Score: 1

      4. Dr. Kalam has been very supportive of humanitarian work. His team developed an ultra-light carbon composite for heat shields of ICBM Agni missile

      That statement made my day. I didn't realize building missiles meant to carry nuclear warheads was humanitarian work though. :)

      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    3. Re:Some facts about our President by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      The point was the next sentence. He realized that material used for heat sheilds also made a good material for prosthetics and worked at getting the technology used for that purpose.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:Some facts about our President by dvNull · · Score: 1

      You work for the PR dept of SCO dont you ?

      dvNuLL

  115. Ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find this pretty amusing. Especially since Microsoft is moving all tech support to India (starting in July with Games and Hardware, ending in September with Office/Outlook).

    I can just see the Indian techs typing up your call notes on a Linux box :)

  116. Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being brainwashing by your nationalistic propaganda must be a blissfull state to be in.

    1. Re:Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the EU passed a law recently, barring their firms from bribing foreign officials? Nope. Bribery is a daily matter of business for European corporations that work in foreign lands.

  117. People in India speak better English than in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You can look forward to tech support that can barely speak proper english, rolls their R's when they do.

    Excuse me?

    Indian English is a direct descendant of British English. AKA "The Queen's English." While most people in the US make Keanu Reeves seem articulate and well-spoken, most sound, to my ears anyway, like they work for the BBC Foreign Service.

    What's better when you get tech support, a guy who gets on the line and sounds like he's gargling marbles and reads from a prepared script, or a guy who speaks better English than you do and actually has a better command of the application than the typical US Level 1 tech?

    India might have a lot of problems, like racial, sectarian and caste intolerance, but lack of education, at least in the big cities, is not a problem. If anything, the US education system should look at India and see what they are doing right.

  118. Re:a new predication for armed conflict? by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    what happens when countries with M$ systems are not able to interoperate with OSS systems?
    Microsoft dries up and blows away.
    At some point the presumption of which of the systems has to give in to the other shifts balance, and slam. Already, "Always Blame Microsoft" is a surprisingly effective tactic.

  119. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: "HA! HA!"

    Your legitimate comment sucked and if this is what you consider "meaningful dialogue" then you deserve a (Score: -5 Smoking Crack) mod.

  120. Open Source and ethics... by towatatalko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is "earth shattering" about it is that indeed it is "earth shattering". It's not that India is one of the poorest countries in the world that matters here, but the brainpower that is inherent in their ability to first adopt then innovate with far less cost to software development. The reason Gates went there was that he recognized it as a potential money saving and money making opportunity as well as doing "charitable" PR with some millions of $.

    In addition, 25% software engineers at MS are Indian. Balngalore area is a huge software and computer-engineering center now that can compare to Silicon Valley, etc. But the reason their Prez spoke about importance of OSS is that he recognized superior ethics in OSS development as compared to proprietary model. So, when India moves in OSS direction there's a model country that can be copied elsewhere. Since ideas from India have considerable intellectual impact on the younger generation in the West since around the 60ies it is in that tradition that OSS can become more widespread than it is now.

    By the way "superior ethics" of OSS is like "karma yoga", or selfless service that one does for the sake of others without expecting a reward or recognition, even though such reward may come anyway, but then you don't dwell on it in your mind, etc. So, OSS is naturally an ally with Indian traditional thinking and so in that regard there's coherent purpose for both.

    --

    IP was invented for the sake of lawsuits.
  121. President Of India Advocates OSS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, the President of Enema advocates ASS!

    Haha, yeah, this deserves an offtopic, but there might be one person who thinks it's funny. Probably not...

  122. Precursors ? by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

    The President of India supports the precursor organization to the CIA ? :-)

    http://www.iamsam.com

  123. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well then perhaps you'd much rather talk about goatse links and bittorrent sites, or maybe go back and forth on whether Apple or PC's are better. I am saying I made a legitimate comment, and it got modded to oblivion...while comments like "As an American I beleive Microsoft is evil and worth ganging up on...MUST BE DESTROYED" is obviously worth a +2 in your eyes. This place can be for meaningful discussion or we can all just sit back in our trenches and argue. Obviously you voted for arguing.

  124. Goodness Gracious Me by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    I can just see the old man from G.G.M. now ..... Linus Torvalds is Indian! Linux comes from India!

    {side note: does anyone know if they're going to do a TV version of "Yes Sir, I Can Boogie"?}

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  125. INSIGHTFULL??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good god, this "insightful" comment proves slashdotters are bunch of fuckin morons

    1. Re:INSIGHTFULL??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope only some are, like the one i am talking to now.

  126. Less intelligent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0 - 0 = -0?

    How much less is that?

  127. Re:Aargh. IIIT != MIT too... by OldTurkeyBuzzard · · Score: 1

    Sure, and equating IIIT to MIT was a bit on the far side ;).

  128. In other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attny. General John Ashcroft has announced plans for the Bush admin. to bomb India, citing the country as a safe haven for mass clusters of "cyber terrorists."

  129. why would they bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India doesn't recognize most forms of foreign intellectual property. Warez are perfectly legal.

  130. It doesn't follow by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Living in a country with corrupt politics doesn't disqualify someone from commenting on corruption wherever and whenever they see it. You speak as if rooting out corruption was as simple as taking a stand against it as an individual. Your Nazi party analogy is less than worthless as you are equating an entire nation with a sub-group that self-selects for intolerance. Nazis are intolerant because this is their philosophy and they encourage all members to be this way is in no way equivalent to: India is corrupt because all Indians are corrupt. No, the Indian government may be corrupt, but that in no way suggests that all or even most Indians are corrupt. Even the idea that their government is more corrupt than the U.S. is dubious, therefore your entire comment has no point.

    Yes, activism must start at home, but there is no reason not to share insights and approaches globally. Often it is easier to sort out the issues from an alien perspective, just as we often have more clarity about our friend's problem than our own.

    Remotely connecting this to the topic, I claim that the widespread adoption of the OSS development model can only be a positive example in terms of transparency and openness. Both of these are very good habits for a society trying to reduce the impact and scope of corruption.

    1. Re:It doesn't follow by swb · · Score: 1

      Living in a country with corrupt politics doesn't disqualify someone from commenting on corruption wherever and whenever they see it. You speak as if rooting out corruption was as simple as taking a stand against it as an individual.

      I'm just sick and tired of the sanctimonious tone taken about the American government, when, for all intents and purposes it is dramatically better than just about any other government on the planet. Usually the same sanctimony comes from people grossly misleading or outright lying about other countries own problems, which are orders of magnitude worse than those in the US.

      Is the US perfect? Absolutely not -- but its flaws are well known, well talked about, and even the leadership class is willing to do something about many of them.

      Another example I liked was some Mexican government official recently complaining about the police treatment of illegal aliens caught while *fleeing* border patrol agents during illegal border crossings -- I just laughed, are we now taking lessons in police procedure and suspect treatment from the *Mexican* government, notorious for bribery, extortion and torture?

    2. Re:It doesn't follow by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 1
      I'm just sick and tired of the sanctimonious tone taken about the American government, when, for all intents and purposes it is dramatically better than just about any other government on the planet.

      That's nice, but it doesn't help your argument. I said nothing about any actual comparisons between governments. You may have had a point if you were replying to a representative of the Indian government, but there is no suggestion that this is the case, unlike the Mexican example in this reply.

      Personally, I don't know much about Indian politics, but from what I do know about U.S. politics, this statement isn't very defensible:

      Is the US perfect? Absolutely not -- but its flaws are well known, well talked about, and even the leadership class is willing to do something about many of them.

    3. Re:It doesn't follow by swb · · Score: 1
      Personally, I don't know much about Indian politics, but from what I do know about U.S. politics, this statement isn't very defensible:
      Is the US perfect? Absolutely not -- but its flaws are well known, well talked about, and even the leadership class is willing to do something about many of them.
      • McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform
      • Microsoft Antitrust Suit
      • Prosecution of Enron, Worldcom Execs
      • Fines imposed on Wall Street Brokerages
      All recent initiatives of the federal government. Some took place under Bush administration or with its support.

      Personally, I don't know much about Indian politics,

      Of course you don't. If you did, you'd be scared to death of a racist, corrupt government of a billion apparently willing to go nuclear with another corrupt government over a patch of land.

      You're experiencing the same illusion that the US is evil and that everyone else is saintly. The US is not saintly, but in comparison to most other places it is much more so.

      Criticize the US government all you want, but please at least judge everyone else by the same criteria.
  131. Contrarily: (was Re: true wisdom) by lysium · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Perhaps in the long view, Gandhi would approve of nuclear weapons because they are an ultimate deterrent. Granted, this might change if the USA goes ahead with tactical nuclear weapons, but as of yet nuclear weapons have created more indirect peace than indirect violence.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  132. Jealous of India by ParadoxDruid · · Score: 1

    Suddenly, I'm very jealous of India... "What should be noted about him is that he is not a politician, but a scientist and an independent thinker foremost." I honestly think that places him in a better position to make responsible decisions for his country than being a career politician (the norm in the US). Is it any surprise that a scientist of some sort would advocate different computer strategies? The biochemistry lab I work at uses linux clusters (OS X) exclusively, because they actually work. Then again, you'll pry my XP Tablet from my dead fingers... or whenever I can get Tablet functionality on another OS

    --
    This statement is solely an opinion. Kindly take it as such in all cases.
  133. What's the point? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Why have a ceremonial President who does nothing? The whole point of a president is to have an elected (well, not all the time) non-hereditary monarch (ie. "executive") for a fixed amount of time that exerts control over the representative body and keeps them in check. If the President does nothing, then you might as well have a ceremonial monarch. This goes for Ireland and Israel as well. Then again, I wish the British Monarchy would exert some of their remaining constitutional powers...I would not be content with ribbon cutting ceremonies at shopping malls when *B* and *C* list celebrities can do that instead...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    1. Re:What's the point? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      India is a Parlimentary system, so the Prime Minister is the real power. It's not better or worse, just different. In theory, the US has a better seperation, but (and I blame the media for this) the office of the President has gotten much more powerful than was intended, so in practice, it's not much different. Right now, ceremonial heads of state are mainly there so the people have a single person to rally around and look up to. This is also why this guy is much more palatable than your average politician.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:What's the point? by intelligent+poster · · Score: 1

      Maybe because its felt that someone who is not elected through an electoral college/whatever is perhaps a bit more impartial especially when you have multiple parties in the reprentative body? And therefore the said parties would be unable to exercise undue influence on the President. Makes sense no?

  134. elitist crap by dh003i · · Score: 1

    So, according to you, only people the top 10% of people in the nation who average a 3.7-4.0 should be able to enter politics, all the rest are banned?

    Fucking moron. Some of our "smartest" Presidents were in fact our very worst Presidents. Go back to the 1920s, where there was a President who was also a phD.

    1. Re:elitist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think that would be a pretty good guideline. What's better, individuals that can't even show a basic grasp of the political stance of leadership hopefuls and their party, shouldn't be allowed to vote. An uninformed vote is an utterly meaningless vote. It would also be nice if policians were culpable for misleading, lying, and petty corruption, and could be forever excluded from office on this basis. Hey, I can dream can't I?

      I'm not saying Intelligent people don't screw up, they just screw up less often than their peers.

    2. Re:elitist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who would be allowed to determine the litmus test of a basic grasp of political stances? Pretty soon, you'll have Communism my dear friend.

  135. Stand up and be counted, you hypocritical coward by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are so fucking stupid it is scary ..
    According to you ,one simply cannot judge anything or anyone.
    If you don't fucking see a difference between some of the regimes out there and US then you are fucking sick and need to get out more.
    Seriously.


    There's a reason why you and the original poster have posted as Anonymous Cowards. It's because you are cowards, because you don't have the guts to stand up and say "this is me, this is my opinion, this is what I truly believe in".

    And, please, try and get it right. I'm not saying that you can't judge others. I'm saying that if you're going to judge others then you should be prepared to be judged yourself.

    The difference between the Indian "regime" and the US? Well, for starters, India hasn't invaded another country under the pretence of eliminating Weapons of Mass Destruction, only to turn around after the invasion and say that finding those WMDs (if they truly exist) isn't that important after all.

    It amazes me when people can't see hypocrisy when it's staring them in the face every fucking day.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  136. I feel bad now... by morgajel · · Score: 2, Funny

    The President of India is advocating opensource.

    I don't even think our president knows what opensource is.
    You ask Bush what he thinks about opensource and I'm sure he'll go into a story of why they're bad and how he got opensource once from kissing a farm animal.

    In all seriousness, I think this is a very good thing. Last time I checked, India had a larger population than wyoming. If their tech school starts churning out linux guys, their country will eventually turn to linux, and there will be much rejoicing

    that would make me happy.

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    1. Re:I feel bad now... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "I don't even think our president knows what opensource is."

      I disagree. I'm sure Bush is aware of open source. I'd bet anything that his advisors have informed him that open source is a threat to our capitalist system and that it must be eliminated.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:I feel bad now... by morgajel · · Score: 1

      touche.

      or as he would say "tooshie!" :)

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  137. Bad news. Lose big. by screenrc · · Score: 0, Troll

    The last thing we need is training Indian
    developers on Linux. It will not be great news
    to off-load Linux developement to India - not
    great news at all, actually, nothing is worse
    than this.

  138. The Last Straw by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    What should be noted about him is that he is not a politician, but a scientist and an independent thinker foremost."

    First they take away jobs from North America, then they elect a scientist for president! Why can't they be like the US and elect actors and politicians (the same thing, IMO)?

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    1. Re:The Last Straw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why can't they be like the US and elect actors and politicians (the same thing, IMO)?


      Because they would then be a superpower like the USA --- and the Americans wouldn't want that....
    2. Re:The Last Straw by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

      In your humble opinion? Opinion has nothing to do with it. It is a fact. Politicians are actors. They must be effective actors or they can not achieve great leadership. Have you ever made presentations at meetings or to a board or a large crowd? You'll notice those who sway and motivate people are those who give great presentations. They influence people's emotions.

      --
      "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  139. You devious manipulator ! Enemy Combatant ! by curtisk · · Score: 1
    I think the aftermath of an untagged sarcastic remark is even funnier than the punchline.

    So true!

    Problem is, here in the US of A things are a bit wacky right now with the economy in the shitter, crazy ass tax reform plans, Patriot Act and the like, a recent war against an "imminent threat" where 2 months later of occupation we've yet to find 1 single gram of WMD agents, or have yet to get Saddam OR Osama (remember him?)"dead or alive", so many end up being, how to say it nicely, "over-sensitive"

    That being the case, sad as it is, still should not curb the use of fine sarcasm! With us second guessing the use of sarcasm......well then, the terrorists already WON!

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  140. Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but Indians for the most part speak good english"

    I see you're using "good" in a completely different way that most people expect.

    1. Re:Ahh... by Chakde+Phate! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or not. Many Indians, particularly those who have been well educated, speak and write better English than 'native' speakers (i.e. British and Americans) if you're talking about spelling and grammar. What Westerners often find it hard to understand is the accent.

      If that's your problem, it's hardly exclusive to Indians; have you ever tried talking to someone from Glasgow?

    2. Re:Ahh... by slakr · · Score: 1

      Jackass.

    3. Re:Ahh... by sn00ker · · Score: 1

      merkins speak English? *cough*

      --
      "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr, userfriendly
  141. Not At All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Most Americans don't think that just because someone is a foreigner that they are a terrorist, up to no good, or are a drag on the economy"

    Most people don't think about foreign countries at all.

    And when you stop to think about it, they're probably right.

  142. Gimme a break. by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1
    demonstarted precisely why much of the world thinks poorly of American

    Then everyone in the world should think poorly of everyone else. The kind of generalizing/profiling that you condemn is common amongst more than Americans. Articles blossomed everywhere after the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal describing widespread fear for parents of Asian college students; many (read many, not all) of them had such a distorted view of American culture that they feared that 'intern' equated to 'sex slave'.

    It is most definitely unreasonable and unfair, and I hate to see my fellow Americans, and my fellow human beings, hate each other for some poorly formed generalizations. But it's also an innately human flaw, not just an American one.

  143. Re:Stand up and be counted, you hypocritical cowar by Networkpro · · Score: 1

    India and the US are not comperable entities. It took a third party (the British) introducing a common language (English) to make the current state possible. India is a Mobocracy that's been experimenting as a socialist state for the past 30 years. +1 for high moral ground , -12 for snagging flamebait hook line and sinker.

  144. Wandering further off topic.. by Trevalyx · · Score: 1
    Is this a troll? Fearing a quarter of the world's people because they share a vague similiarity in skin colour, culture and religion (as if there were no diversity in the Middle East!) is unwittingly ignorant and primitive.

    Appearantly you didn't bother to read past the word "things". You're misconstruing my statement. I'm not condoning it, but I'm also saying it's somewhat understandable, or to make an analogy,
    It isn't to say that we should be afraid, but if you get bitten by your neighbor's dog, you're bound to be a bit wary of your neighbor and dogs in general for a while, especially if you see them regularly going after each-other's throats.

    As has been over examined earlier, I mean nothing derogatory by using dogs as a analogy. Just the first thing that came to mind. Don't go hunting for ethnocentric bigotry or mindless hate in my posts. If you find them, you're twisting my words further than logic allows and merely projecting your world view on to me, in a weird little subconcious ploy to make things work in the your own particular version of the universe.
    Which isn't to say I have an issue with living in your own version of reality. Just don't make me play there.
    1. Re:Wandering further off topic.. by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      I read and quoted your words. Your reply was incredibly arrogant and mainly comprised solely of personal fantasies you extrapolated from my response. Move your lips slowly as you read your own words, important enough that you quoted them twice:

      ...especially if you see them regularly going after each-other's throats.

      "They"? All Middle-Easterns? All the immense range of cultures, nations and religions you apparently lump into on stereoptype? It might not be 'mindless hate', but it certainly meets the definition of bigotry and, that you can't see past it, unwitting confirmation once again of the attitude I meant.

    2. Re:Wandering further off topic.. by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Watch your pronouns moron. He was refering to dogs.

      People like you really piss me off. You are the type of person that actively searches for something to be offended about. Not everything that is said is meant to offend you. And when I say People like you, I am refering to people that try to be offended, not Middle Easterners or any other group.

  145. FLAMEBAIT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how this blatant flamebait gets modded so high i dunno, it proves slashdot moderation is a piece of shit.

  146. Lots of caveats by agslashdot · · Score: 1

    As a fellow Indian, lemme summarize the problems with this, many of which have already been pointed out -

    1. The Indian president is defined in the constitution as a "titular head". Granted he is probably the best thing that happened to India - a nuclear physicist, a real visionary, but he still is NOT the prime minister. So at best, his take on OSS is an opinion, not an official directive.

    2. IT has made billions for India, sure, but which part of India? You might think IT touches say 10% of India. Guess what, IT directly affects less than 0.1% of India!!! Strange but true. India is primarily a village economy. The 0.1% who are affected live in metropolitan cities like Bangalore ( India's silicon valley ), Hyderabad, Bombay etc. They are rich beyond belief compared to the average guy on the street. But they are surrounded by the remaining 99.9% , of which >70% belong to villages, earning less than $1 a day. This is the reality in India.

    3. Indian IT has yet to make a single brand-name software product for its internal Indian consumer market. The top Indian IT companies viz Infosys, Wipro, TCS etc. make all their revenue writing code for US companies who outsource. There's a rising backlash in the US today against such "code-coolies" ( 5 states have "banned" outsourcing government IT jobs to India...NJ, CT & a few others ). Take a look at the stock price of Infosys ( ticker INFY ) - it took a nosedive recently for forecasting lower growth in next quarter. Conditions are very difficult. At this time, revenue ( from proprietary MS products ) is more critical than technical expertise ( from OSS ).

    4. The president's remark did not even attract a passing glance in the local Indian news...tells you how little atention is paid to it by the masses.

    5. I do hope 1-4 get reversed...but a quick reality-check tells me otherwise.

    1. Re:Lots of caveats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post gives the impression that IT has never had any influence on India.

      1. As a man with a good deal of technical background, his words do carry weight. Surely it wont change things overnight..but his remarks made this fellow Indian respond atleast.

      2. 0.1 % of the Indian population is nevertheless a huge number.

      3. This fellow Indian is prolly misinformed about software development in India. The Autolay software developed by ADA,bangalore is being used by Airbus Industries. The LCA aircraft programme uses stuff developmed at home.
      India is developing products....but considering we are only about 6-7 years into software development , it will take more time for products from home.

      4. Considering that 99.9% of the population are according to the fellow Indian, out of the IT loop, newspapers really shoundt care to publish this.By the way please dude, check your stats. Im actually feeling stupid to respond to this post.

      5.A reality check from me tells me the reality check you did needs a reality check itself.

  147. Open Source, Open Borders, Open Pink Slips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff sed

  148. IIT MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please IIT not on par with anything like MIT..

  149. Not the "foremost academic institution" by phliar · · Score: 1
    You're thinking of the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT), which matches your description ("foremost institution," "equivalent of MIT" etc.). This is IIIT -- three I's. There are five IITs (Delhi, Bombay, Kanpur, Madras, Kharagpur) and there are courses of study (undergraduate and postgraduate) for all engineering disciplines and physical sciences, and it includes the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Not "IT."

    The IIIT (three I's) is in Software Technology Park, Hinjewadi Pune.

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  150. Pull yer head out of the sand will ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask yourself what does EUMAP do, and what are its goals?

    Furhtermore about Eu laws
    http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/2002/10 /15/st ory182615726.asp
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_po litics/1653721.stm

  151. Not suprising & not significant by jordandeamattson · · Score: 3, Interesting


    First, I don't find this speech all that surprising. India since Gandhi and his spinning wheel has had a focus on independnce as a people and a country. Nehru - first prime minister of India - and others pushed for the formation of IIT to help India grow their own crop of engineering professionals. In this they have been extremely successful, but the unexpected consequence is that that engineering talent has been exported to other countries. And well it should, for it is top-notch (here I speak as someone who has two IIT grads in my chain-of-command and work closely with a passel of them and am hiring three to work for me in India).



    On the other hand, this speech is not all that significant. Dr Kalam's influence is extremely limited. Remember that in India the president is the head of the state, with little - if any - power or authority. This speech is roughly equivalent to Queen Elizabeth coming out in favor of OSS. Would it make the news? Yes. Would it influence British business or political decisions in a significant way? Probably not. The equivalent in power and authority to the US President in India is the Prime Minister.



    Dr Kalam hold the larger ceremonial position of president because of his work as the "rocket man". He is the person that gave India ballistic missiles and his naming to this position by the BJP (the leading, Hindu Nationalist party that runs the current Indian goverment) was at the point where tensions were at their highest with Pakistian last year. It is widely thought it was to send a message to Pakistian that India was serious about Kashmiar and would not back-down.



    Bottom line, I don't think that IIT grads will be focusing their energies on OSS work. It is their desire to land a job with a Microsoft, Adobe, InfoSys, Tata Consulting Group, or Wipo. These companies are focuing on building and delivering non-OSS software.

  152. roots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Jesuits are doing something holy, something sacrosanct, by working in the field of education," Kalam said. "Education gives one the ultimate human value." The Indian leader--himself a graduate of a Jesuit school in the southern Tamil Nadu state--praised the Jesuits for their "excellent contributions not only in India but the world over."

    President Kalam said: "If India is to be a developed country, the role of the Jesuits will be crucial to creating an appropriate system of value-based education."

  153. how did that comment even get moderated up?? by CowBovNeal · · Score: 1
    LOL. That statement is so stupid, where do I even start. I read about this conflict in the washpost. When India and Pakistan were partitioned, Kashmir went to India. Pakistan wanted it ever since.

    Those two countries have even fought 2 wars over it because Pakistan wanted Kashmir. India is fighting to keep Pakistan from making Kashmir a part of Pakistan.

    Seriously, your one dumb and ignorant moron.
    --
    Bush is on fire and its not good for my lungs.
    1. Re:how did that comment even get moderated up?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that as far as the United Nations is concerned, Kashmir is a disputed territory. Both India and Pakistan have claims over it, and both refuse to budge. It is high time that the UN should intervene so that peace could exist in South Asia.

    2. Re:how did that comment even get moderated up?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the People in Kashmir want to be a part of Pakistan, but India is brutally repressing them! There have been thousands of deaths, mass murders and rapes.

    3. Re:how did that comment even get moderated up?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously you are another of those dumb ignorant morons!

  154. President Of India Advocates OSS, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    President Of India Advocates OSS and

    Letting cows and steers pooping in the streets

    Ensuring rats run wild in the streets and homes

    Making chicks wear that funky dot between their eyes

  155. Remember that Urban Legend ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  156. Yawn by mechanos · · Score: 1

    Munich and India advocate open source! Soon MS will be gone and the world be as one, singing in perfect harmony! Yawn. India's adopting open source in order to stop buying US made software (which is mostly MS platform). First they steal IT jobs, to break the incomes of US IT workers, then they develop their own version of Linux which will cut the incomes of US software businesses- which includes MS, but don't forget a lot of companies develop for the MS platform will lose money in the bargain too, which means developers for those companies lose their jobs too. Of course, the linux zealots consider MS developers as infidels anyway. I know I'll probably be flamed to death for it, but having the USA stick with a USA-centric platform like MS may be the best shot US IT workers have at retaining their jobs. If India totally abandons MS, then maybe some jobs (including call centers for MS specific products) may move back to the USA.

  157. We're number 1. Period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you going to do now? Claim that *I* don't have the 'moral authority' to criticize the government either?

    Max

    No, Max, I'm simply going to allow you to point out that you lack the *intellectual* authority to criticize the US gubmint. Your risible and provably false "ratiocination" as to the motive behind the liberation of Iraq does just that. I pity you.

    ...just remember, nobody ever picks on number 2.

  158. Oh yeah?! by balthan · · Score: 1

    My president can beat your president up!

  159. His Speech was given at ISquareIT, Pune by jurrendsd · · Score: 1

    The president gave his speech at I Square IT, Pune and not IIIT Hyderabad. I Square IT is a private institute run by the Finolex foundation and its certainly not a premier institution by any standards . It just started around two years back. I know because I gave and cleared its entrance exam for this year.

  160. Nonsense! by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1
    Northamericans -please, dont use "american"; america is mucho more that US

    I guess this is a troll, but it irritates me so much that I have to respond.

    'Northamerican' would be inaccurate by your flawed logic, too. Canada is part of North America, and clearly you're talking about citizens of the USA.

    The United States of America is the only country of the world to include 'America' in its title, so calling someone from the US an 'American' uses an accurate and unique derivative of the country's name. Perhaps you should review some geography lessons on the differences between countries and continents.

    i'm sure indian president talk better english than George W. Bush

    Lastly, you should really check your own grammar before you criticize someone else's.

  161. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by IPFreely · · Score: 1
    ganging up against Microsoft simply because they're American (or perhaps they just act "American"...)

    Never attribute to idealism what can be addiquately explained by greed.

    People are ganging up on Microsoft, American people as well as other nationalities, because Microsoft is wielding a great deal of power to control markets and extract money (i.e. They are a bunch of greedy bastards). It wouldn't matter if they were europian or not. If there was a europian comapany that acted the same way, they would be villified as well.

    As far as they're being "American", It's more like "America" is viewed as Microsoftish, in that there is a high concentration of "greedy bastard" companies in America that are trying to wield similar power and control around the world (RIAA, MPAA, Pharmicuticals, ...). Many people in many countries resent these companies, and by association the country from which they come.
    When you hear someone complain about "America" doing something, take a deep breath, listen to exactly what they are talking about, and recognise that there is usually a specific entity within America, a company or group or agency, that is doing the dirty work. It is just the person complaining that is making the grander association. Don't get dragged into it too far.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  162. Re:Anti-Americanism/Microsoftism by BJZQ8 · · Score: 1

    That's what I meant by my comments...that "American", as in living in the United States, is beginning to become indistinguishable from the corporate culture of greed. People from around the world are beginning to assume that just since Microsoft and Enron and the RIAA are attempting to put their collective boots on the world's neck, that all American people are too.

  163. Re:Interesting for India's - and the world's - fut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, you're the President of India. You're trying to make your country more money.

    Stopped reading here. You obviously do not understand India.

    Try: You're trying to the make the world a better place.

    He's no materialist.

  164. Re:Interesting for India's - and the world's - fut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open Source Advantages:

    * Free (as in Beer) -


    Many Indian states (e.g. Gujrat) ary "dry states": no beer ;-)

  165. Give credit where credit is due. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    The irony here being that (according to the article) "The announcement, made on Wednesday [August 28, 2002], stated that from now on, all software developed for the government must be licenced under the GPL." referring to the GNU General Public License, a license written over a decade before the Open Source movement began and written to ensure certain the freedom to share and modify software. Speaking in terms of freedom is eschewed by the Open Source Initiative.

    I'm glad that the GNU GPL is getting more use and I welcome the efforts of any organization who wishes to encourage increased GPL use, but I also think it's reasonable to give credit where credit is due. Merely including a seminal license on a list of acceptable licenses does not compare with writing that license or sticking with the ideas expressed in that license.

  166. Windows 2000 powers his website !!! by pavkb · · Score: 1

    Check this out. presidentofindia.nic.in

    1. Re:Windows 2000 powers his website !!! by pavkb · · Score: 1

      And the pm's office
      The prime-miniters website moved from Linux to Windows go figure.

      Atleast this guy who maintains these above sites
      www.nic.in moved from solaris to linux !!!

  167. Well in that case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am a graduate student" ...and therefore are not worth listening too.

    Come back after playtime, junior.

  168. Crack me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Considering that Indian students are respected the world over"

    This is so funny that milk just shot out of my nose.

  169. Wake up moderators by Chakde+Phate! · · Score: 1

    How the hell did this get modded interesting?

  170. Re: Rationate this by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
    This post is hilarious!

    "...just remember, nobody ever picks on number 2."

    And just what number do you think Iraq is? I suspect that Max has plenty of intellectual authority.
    I'm probably missing the sarcasm of this post....

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  171. I can prove Bush is smarter than Kalam... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Before they were born, they chose the lives they'd assume. Bush chose to become the man that would one day become the President of the World's Most Powerful Nation, and Kalam chose to become the man who would one day become the figurehead of the world's largest third world nation. Gee, that's a no-brainer...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  172. so what... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Jimmy Carter was a nuclear scientist. A great president, he was not...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  173. India is escalating tensions with Pakistan by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    India claims Pakistan sponsors terrorism in Kashmir and they are escalating nuclear tension with Pakistan over it, or vice versa, depending upon your viewpoint if you actually care. Somehow I doubt if India defeated Pakistan and took over the country they'd institute democracy for all those muslims when they can't even treat 300 million of their own existing citizens (untouchables) with decency. Talk about uninformed hypocrisy... But us Americans are out to steal the Iraqi oil...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    1. Re:India is escalating tensions with Pakistan by harisheldon · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that!

      It was called East Pakistan, now it is Bangladesh (a democracy). What more, it was done under the shadow of Nixon's nukes who did not want his favorite mass murderer replaced by an elected president.

      We have had untouchable presidents and a prime minister within 50yrs. American hasn't managed to elect a black, Jewish or even a women president in 200+ yrs.

      Now let's talk about hypocrisy.

    2. Re:India is escalating tensions with Pakistan by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      Point of order. Had Colin Powell ran for the Presidency, he would've been elected by a landslide. His wife discouraged him from running due to assassination fears. As everyone else has pointed out, the Presidency of India is a figurehead position whereas our Presidency holds power...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  174. Re:Fuck you all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u gotta be a homo nigger...

  175. Re:Aargh. IIIT != MIT too... by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

    yeah. IIIT is better than MIT

  176. Re:Giving your software away hardly means bankrupt by tjwhaynes · · Score: 1
    The competitive environment must be reason number one for a free operating system. On the desktop, there is no genuine competitive market. Does anyone honestly believe that Microsoft Office is worth $300 or more?

    MS Office is worth whatever people are prepared to pay for it. I certainly don't believe it is worth it - with OpenOffice.org on one side for people who need to knock fairly complex documents together and lyx/LaTeX/DocBook for serious publication work, I have no need for MS Office.

    My view is more along the lines of print publishing. Nothing prevents you from using it or seeing how it's done. There's nothing proprietary about it but if I write something, you aren't allowed to rearrange the ideas or the words if I don't grant that right. There is nothing harsh about that concept. The harsh part comes from the Linux community alienating the people with the power to speed things along.

    Funnily enough, that is almost exactly the license that the BSD provides. The GPL only goes the extra mile and says that if I offer this to you under these conditions, then you should do likewise if you offer it others.

    I don't see the Linux community alienating the people with the power to speed things along either. Most of the inhibitors to people getting on board with Free software has more to do with rumours and FUD than legal hurdles.

    You might not like it and I might not like it but money makes things happen. You cannot tell companies that OSS is a good idea but they will have to abandon everything they understand in order to benefit from it.

    I don't believe that companies have to abandon everything they understand to benefit from OSS. How many companies rely on perl for some critcal part of their environments, for example? That doesn't make their perl scripts OSS. Nor does it magically infect all the other parts of the infrastructure that perl glues together and make them OSS either.

    Companies need assurances that they can write software without giving it away.

    They have it today and it's not going away. What has changed is that there may be a free alternative out there that they will have to be (considerably) better than in order to get sales. I work on DB2 Universal Database - I look around and see MySQL, SAP DB and other Free database projects. Many of these provide plenty for a basic database and many people will not need to look outside those Free packages to get the features they need. The challenge for companies writing software to sell (as opposed to writing software under contract for other companies) is to ensure that they provide sufficient extra value to justify the cost.

    Trust me - it can be a great incentive.

    Cheers,
    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  177. India 4th largest PPP with thriving IT and OSS by fromcalifornia · · Score: 1

    A lot of negatives perceptions about Indian economy and IT industry are based on outdated facts. A few things to think about: On the macro economic side, in 2001 Indian economy was ranked 4th largest in the world by PPP per World Bank (US - $9.8 trillions, China - $5.1, Japan $3.19 and India $2.9). India's PPP is about double that of UK, France or Italy. http://www.worldbank.org/data/databytopic/GDP_PPP. pdf You can also get country info from the US Govt sources - http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos /in.html#Econ India does compare poorly on per-capita basis and still has a long way to achieve the living standards of the west (possibly another half a century or more). The disposable income of the consumer class is vast and one of the fastest growing in the world. Last year India enjoyed the second fastest export growth in the whole world at about 15% (China grew the fastest at about 20%). After China and Korea, India has been the third fastest growing economy of all nations in the world in recent years. The GDP has been averaging about 5% growth rate (4 in bad and 7 in good). Bill Gates/Microsoft, Intel, IBM, Cisco, GE, Sun have all publicly stated that they consider Indian IT industry to be one of the most strategic ones in the whole world (not necessarily "large" but "strategic"). The OSS movement is fairly strong in India. It is not as strong as in the US or Europe but there are several active conferences, contributors, dedicated labs, etc. in India. The President of India is simply reflecting an already strong stream of thought. Many of the reseasrch labs seem to support OSS. It is also not true that it is not paying to develop OSS in India. One can market related services or work with IBM or numerous players looking actively for OSS development skills in India.

  178. offended ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Indian fascism is okay, then, right?

  179. The Thing Is. by torpor · · Score: 1

    There *are* a lot of starving, hungry people in India, who have no chance whatsoever.

    That you chose to ignore the details in the message - which is that the President of India is advocating the Linux/OSS mantra of DIY technology, and this might mean something to one of the 300,000 street kids in Delhi who would just *LOVE* to be able to get a job without having to first wade through hordes of pompous asses like you to get there.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:The Thing Is. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      There *are* a lot of starving, hungry people in India, who have no chance whatsoever.

      That you chose to ignore the details in the message - which is that the President of India is advocating the Linux/OSS mantra of DIY technology, and this might mean something to one of the 300,000 street kids in Delhi who would just *LOVE* to be able to get a job without having to first wade through hordes of pompous asses like you to get there.

      Care to explain how they're going to feed those starving people when they're sending millions of dollars per year to an American company for software licenses?

      You really are dumber than a box of hammers. Did you ever think that the PM of India, who has a doctorate in ROCKET SCIENCE, is a bit smarter about Indian economics than you are!?

    2. Re:The Thing Is. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Ummm... I'm saying that the government of India has recognized that Linux is a tech booster that *doesn't require funding or investment* it simply requires motivation.

      I not once mentioned that there is a license to be paid. I dunno where you got that from.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:The Thing Is. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I not once mentioned that there is a license to be paid. I dunno where you got that from.

      Probably from the same place where you got the idea that I said anything about Linux. Presumably this is the same place where you fabricated the idea that I don't think there are poor people in India, or that I'm trying to stop 300 thousand Indian street kids from getting a job. If you want to start talking about crazy ideas appearing out of thin air, you are not in any position to claim innocence.

      If you want clarification of my position: I think the PM is being very sensible by advocating OSS. It means more money stays in India where it belongs instead of paying for programmer salaries in the USA.

      Now that you know my position, were your foul attacks on my character justified?

    4. Re:The Thing Is. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Foul attacks on your character? I don't know you, all I was trying to say is that you shouldn't ignore the *FACT* about the India poor people situation when discussing these things - Linux has a *LOT* to give India with regards to this poblem.

      I never said you didn't think there were poor people in India, I just said that your inability to account for the poor when criticizing what other people say about India is insensitive.

      Fact is, if the world thinks that India is full of poor people, here's a news flash: its because it *IS* full of poor people, and the fortunate minority (such as yourself) who are able to support themselves ought to recognize that Linux/OSS can *help* with this problem. Minorities such as yourself (not starving in India? Then you're in the minority) ought not to be so knee-jerk about the situation in your country.

      The promotion of leg-up style industry such as OSS/Linux supports, in India particularly, could only be a good thing. Detracting from the issue by turning this debate into an argument about "American attitude about India" is ignoring the fact, going off-topic, and ... in my opinion ... demonstrates a significant deficiency in character.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:The Thing Is. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I don't know you, all I was trying to say is that you shouldn't ignore the *FACT* about the India poor people situation when discussing these things - Linux has a *LOT* to give India with regards to this poblem.

      No kidding. That's my opinion also. But I didn't state *any* opinion at first. I joked about the bigot and left it at that. You on the other hand, just assumed the worst and launched into a rant. Even now after I gave you my opinion, which should have put this matter to rest, you are still going off like an angry kettle.

      I never said you didn't think there were poor people in India...

      Fact is, if the world thinks that India is full of poor people, here's a news flash: its because it *IS* full of poor people

      If you "never said it" then why are you still lecturing me as if this is news? Fact is, you're not even listening to me. If you were then you'd not be lecturing me about the "benefits of OSS in India" in reply to my post where I'd stated that OSS will benefit India!

      Detracting from the issue by turning this debate into an argument about "American attitude about India" is ignoring the fact, going off-topic, and ... in my opinion ... demonstrates a significant deficiency in character.

      I don't consider it a deficiency of character to insult a bigot. Also I never consider it an inappropriate time, and never off-topic. Bigots deserve to be ridiculed at ALL times.

      I would say that your defense of the bigots on this thread - just look around, they've all come out of the woodwork to bash India - is by far the greatest deficiency of character I can imagine.

    6. Re:The Thing Is. by torpor · · Score: 1

      I'm not defending any bigots.

      I think you must just like to be pissed on.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    7. Re:The Thing Is. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I'm not defending any bigots.

      No? I say your demand for silence is defence enough. You said:

      "American attitude about India" is ignoring the fact, going off-topic, and ... in my opinion ... demonstrates a significant deficiency in character.

      In other words, you are perfectly happy for a bigot to speak their mind and go unopposed. You are not satisfied to merely keep quiet yourself; you insist on attacking anybody who speaks out against the bigot. Do you know what is meant by "tacit support"? You claim that you are not defending the bigots. I think you are fooling yourself.

      BTW: It beggars belief that you denied you were attacking my character, then in the same figurative breath you said I had a "deficiency of character". Are you always this confused?

    8. Re:The Thing Is. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, no, I'm not rigging it like I'm "happy" that some 'bigot' (faaark, I dunno, that was a looooong thread ago) was able to speak their mind and go unopposed.

      I'm just saying, when someone says "Free and Open Tech can Help India" don't go fucking replying "India doesn't need yo' bitchass bigot help, mo-fo', we already smart!"

      Free and Open Tech *can* help India, and thanks very much to the President of India for stating it, and here's to all the human beings who will have heard this wonderous nugget of news in the subcontinent, who then subsequently go on to rock. Maybe they will teach the *Ignorant *Few in the United States a thing or two about code. Great, cool.

      As for you, 'hathan'h' whateverthegoose your name is, you've got a bit of a chip on your shoulder, mate, if you think this has *anything* to do with you, personally.

      You, personally, are insignificant in this thread; only what you say matters.

      Assuming that someone is antagonistic when they profer a view which may actually help is pretty cowardly. I say, attack life with a challenge: try not to *ever* acknowledge bigotry. Especially when you use it to attack a 'group of people' whose views oppose yours.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    9. Re:The Thing Is. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I'm just saying, when someone says "Free and Open Tech can Help India" don't go fucking replying "India doesn't need yo' bitchass bigot help, mo-fo', we already smart!"

      Do you really think I said anything like that? Even with the greatest stretch of the imagination, and reading out of context, and looking for all the negativity imaginable, do you *really* think that I said anything like that?

      Especially when you use it to attack a 'group of people' whose views oppose yours.

      Now tell me, what "group of people" are you talking about.

    10. Re:The Thing Is. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Whatever. Yes I do think you said that, or else I wouldn't have bothered to continue to contribute to this painful thread. I also think its amusing, again or else I wouldn't have bothered.

      Interesting iconography on your site, to change the subject completely ... 'manu et manu' ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    11. Re:The Thing Is. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Whatever. Yes I do think you said that, or else I wouldn't have bothered to continue to contribute to this painful thread. I also think its amusing, again or else I wouldn't have bothered.

      Then you'd have no trouble highlighting where I previously used the words "mofo", "bitchass", and "we already smart".

      You still haven't answered my question: what "group of people" are you talking about.

    12. Re:The Thing Is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I kept a foes list. You'd be my first since the zoo was introduced.

    13. Re:The Thing Is. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I wish I kept a foes list.

      As if I care.

  180. Re:mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the institutes mentioned IIIT are not to be confused with IITs which are the premier engineering schools in india

  181. he's edumacated by guest12 · · Score: 1

    but i wish he gets a crewcut soon

  182. This explains everything! by stull · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is due to the intellectual and moral superiority of India's leadership as noted in so many posts today that the following events have occured: 1) The massive influx of American workers, both professional and unskilled, to India. 2) The rampant outsourcing of Indian technical jobs to offshore companies, many of them located in the United States, and the resultant strain that it has placed on the traditionally strong Indian IT labor market. 3) The incredibly generous work visas that have been issued by the Indian government to support and encourage the points mentioned above. In fact, a google search on "India" and "Visas" will produce dozens of websites specifically geared towards Americans seeking temporary work visas in India. 4) India's current position as the only superpower in the world, reviled and yet relied upon by all nations to take an active part in resolving all of the Earth's problems and conflicts be they of a socioeconomic or geopolitical nature. Need I continue? The signs are everywhere, from the points that I have listed above to the Indian cultural influence that has taken the world by storm! In every nation one will find Sari wearing teenyboppers blasting the latest hits from Ravi Shankar while sucking down tons of Lamb Vindaloo ... and don't forget the blockbusters coming out of Baliwood these days. I hope I'm not trolling, on this, my very first post to /.. I love the tech talk, but the flagrant anti-Americanism i have seen today gets me right here. There is one last point I would like to make to all those who feel that Dubya is a "Simian" (Direct quote from a post that received an unwarrented rating of 5) -- he passed a tax cut that has already shown signs of bolstering the economy and set it to "Expire" in five years unless the decision is made to renew it. Hmmm ... does that mean that a full year before he is up for re-election he has already set the agenda for the next race? The main issue will have to be whether or not the cut will be renewed, thereby either raising taxes or keeping them at what will by then be the level people are accustomed to. We already know what his platform will be ... lets see how many Democrats will be forced into saying "I'm going to raise your taxes ... vote for me!" Is that the act of a simian or of a shrewd and clever politician?

    --
    "When they kick at your front door, how you gonna come?" - Saint Joe
    1. Re:This explains everything! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A most impressive troll, sir. I must try your brand of pot.

  183. Not a politician? by korielgraculus · · Score: 1

    He's the president, for God's sake! If that doesn't make him a politician, what does? The fact that the guy must have devoted a reasonable chunk of his adult life to getting into office means that he must be a politician par excellence!

  184. Re:Second coming of the Crusades by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

    Hear, hear. I've been saying essentially the same thing for a while now.

    How could a proportion of them not hate us, after the "original" Crusades? And then we have the audacity to name a motorized Howitzer the "Crusader" ...

    --
    "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
  185. Security/Crypto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some history required here:

    0. Kalam used to run the Indian Defense Organization.

    1. The old US 40bits good for export only policy.

    2. The incident involving Crypto AG and Pakistan where the key bits were leaked into the data stream.

    There was a recommendation made years ago within the Indian defense and security establishments to avoid using any US closed source systems. Not sure what exactly they use, but it ain't M$ Windows for sure. Probably some variant of BSD or the almighty Linux.

    Unlikely as it sounds, this president actually understands this stuff. (I know, as I've been in a presentation where he was asking a lot of questions.)

  186. Re:Aargh. IIIT != MIT too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you just say 'far'!?!?!?! :o :o

  187. Re:Acccchh... by mholt108 · · Score: 1

    accchhh -nnnicchhh kknnnnooooonnn eeeerrrtt uuu aaac cccchhh seyin

  188. Add more curry to the fuel by Information+Minister · · Score: 1

    There are no Americans in Baghdad.

  189. OSS in home of Simputer by Mokurai · · Score: 1

    It doesn't suprise me that somebody who is aware of the potential of the Simputer (Linux handheld for poor people) would encourage development for it.

    GNU-India is working on Free Unicode fonts for all writing systems of India, something you don't see Microsoft, Apple, or the commercial Unix vendors doing. Simputers are in field trials in agriculture, banking, the Post Office, health, and education in India. There are more than 50 for-profit companies developing for the Simputer, too.

    --
    "A knot!" said Alice, ever ready to be useful. "Oh, do let me help to undo it!"
  190. Re:Aargh. IIIT != MIT by vaibhavkhattri · · Score: 1

    IIIT is no where equivalent to MIT. Infact it is called I-square-It. It's just another institute offering commercial training for computers.

    The submitter has confused IITs, the pride of India, with this institute.

  191. Thats not what a man is.... by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    I think that people seem to confuse great politicians with hero's or great men. Bush didn't have to prove himself to be a man before he came to power. Your not a great man when you order others to fight your wars and happen to rile up a crowd of people to violence.

    I'm sorry but in this regard Bush and Osama Bin Laden are similar and very dangerous to the rest of society.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  192. I2IT and IIIT by shamir_k · · Score: 1

    There has been a lot of confusion lately, so let me try and clear some up
    President Kalam spoke at theInternational Institute of Information Technology, Pune, known as isquareit

    This has nothing to do with International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad , or with Indian Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore. Dunno they same to love the IIT acronym, wonder why? :-)

  193. Foremost academic institution equivalent to MIT by Argon · · Score: 1
    Indian Institutes of Information Technology (there
    are many) may be very good instituitions for all
    I know but by no stretch of imagination are they
    "foremost academic institutions equivalent to MIT". That honor goes to the IITs (Indian Institute of
    Technology), IISc (Indian Institute of Science) in Bangalore and IIMs (Indian Institute of Management).


    If anything IIIT (note three Is) will rank behind Regional Engineering Colleges, Anna University, BITS and other premier Engineering Colleges in the country.

    Our President (I am in India) promoting Open Source is a wonderful thing (he's an eminent
    scientist) but portraying IIIT as something which it is not was totally unnecessary.

  194. Are you sure? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    What is India's GDP?

    How many people live in abject poverty?

    How many die of preventable diseases?

    Access to clean water?

    What is your definition of sizeable?

    Etc.

    I don't want to rain in your parade, I just need to point out that the first step to achieve improvement in any field is to recognize the problems and obstacles one faces.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  195. Ability to speak.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... may not be a measure of intelligence (although lack of it normally points out to cognitive problems of some kind or another).

    The problem is that politicians must be able to communicate effectively with others.

    The horrible thing about Mr Bush evident lack of verbal dexterity is that the US public is more than happy to support somebody that can't offer more than small soundbites and who cant put forward an idea coherently.

    Do you want this kind of person leading your country? Ovbiously most US people do, specially now after he fullfilled the cowboy fantasy in a global scale, but that says loads more about the state of US politics than about sorry Mr Bush hiself.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  196. Slashdot : PlEASE CORRECT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The headliner of the article talks about Indian Institute of Information Technology (IIIT) as India's answer to MIT!!
    Well that place is reserved in stone by Indian Institite of Technology (IIT)
    Please get your I's straight

  197. Neither does OpenBSD Re: (...) runs IIS on Win2k by Ravioli · · Score: 1

    Neither does OpenBSD's website run their software. I wouldn't be particularly happy if the President installs Linux boxen at work, and admin's them all day ...
    --

    --
    I am too lame to make a .signature!
  198. not quite by Xabraxas · · Score: 0
    I am sure this is a first. The President of India has urged Indian IT Professionals to develop and specialise in OSS rather than Windows.

    Nah. Same thing happened in Peru not too long ago.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason