Slashdot Mirror


A Condensed History Of The Keyboard

An anonymous reader points to this overview of old (good) keyboards versus the cheap and nasty kind which begins "Today's keyboards aren't what they used to be, no sir! Back in my day, we had our BS technology; our keyboards had chassis's which allowed 'em to be thrown off a 3-story building and still work - barely dented. Yes those were the days." Not a lot of new information, but some good visuals.

567 comments

  1. I miss those teletype printers... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In those days, 'audiovisual feedback' actually meant something. Long rolls of dead tree recording every single charxxxacaaxxxx ^h^h\H^H^H/d/d ^C^C^Q^Deof.DAMN...

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:I miss those teletype printers... by nikmal · · Score: 1

      Too right - it has all been downhill since the days of the ASR-33: (10 characters per second providing keyboard, printer, paper tape reader and paper tape punch) plus real exercise for the fingers (well two fingers...). The rot set in with the KSR-33 (but that did at lease receive the first email message - see this fine photo)

    2. Re:I miss those teletype printers... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Informative
      I remember them, but I don't miss them... In the days when I worked on Burroughs B3700s, (when the Earth was newly-cooled, and Real Programmer were Real Programmers etc...) the only real keyboard interface was through a teletype, which had a key action something like a 1930s typewriter. The data entry chicks had much more sophisticated keyboards on their tape encoding machines (remember those?)

      But the only way to get your code in reliably was to use a 029 card-punch. When I wasn't trying not to get eaten by dinosaurs, that is :-)

    3. Re:I miss those teletype printers... by Gandalf1957 · · Score: 1

      Only recently disposed of my Creed Model 7B Teletype originally modded for rtty use on the amateur bands - drop one of those off a 3 storey building and you'd risk killing someone !!

    4. Re:I miss those teletype printers... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "The data entry chicks had much more sophisticated keyboards on their tape encoding machines (remember those?)"

      Flexowriter?

  2. I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by zubernerd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quoting the story: Key caps allow one to reconfigure their letters without actually prying off the keys from the keyboard. This was implemented due to the aforementioned QWERTY/Dvorak controversy.
    I loved the ability to remove the cap keys, every few weeks I would remove all the cap keys from my keyboard and clean each one by hand using a bleach solution, inside and out. It's great for all us obsessive-compulsive cleaners.
    The other great thing about them was the ability to play practical jokes, all one had to do was change around a few 'key' keys and watch all the non-touch typists in a computer lab get pissed off at the computer. And with Windows 2k, I'd change the insert and delete keys around, (makes it hard to use CTRL-ALT-DEL to get to the login screen)

    --
    Accentuate the positive, don't waste your mod points on the negative.
    1. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by mitch0 · · Score: 1

      heh, I still use one of those old IBM things. works grate, weighs a lot and noisy as hell :)

      got it when my old working place thru out old computer parts. also got a vt510 then for the price of a hamburger. that one b0rked though during a thunderstorm :(

      my other favourite keyboard is the happy hacking keyboard for its size.

      cheers,
      mitch

      --
      // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips,
      // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
    2. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Squareball · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we need are the _[]x window buttons on the keyboard so that we can minimize, maxamize and close windows with 1 push of a keyboard button.

    3. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by mitch0 · · Score: 1

      erm, seems my command of english was lost somewhere :)

      s/grate/great/
      s/thru/threw/
      s/badenglish/good english/g in fact.

      sorry folks

      --
      // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips,
      // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
    4. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by zanderredux · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Minimize and maximize keys! And a pair jog dial buttons, each one on each side of the keyboard, so we can easily switch windows!

    5. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 4, Informative

      "What we need are the _[]x window buttons on the keyboard so that we can minimize, maxamize and close windows with 1 push of a keyboard button."

      In Windows:
      Alt-Space N
      Alt-Space X
      Alt-F4

    6. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      What we need are the _[]x window buttons on the keyboard so that we can minimize, maxamize and close windows with 1 push of a keyboard button.

      <bigot mode="X11">Then get a real window system.</bigot>

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try Alt + Tab to switch windows

    8. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      As I recall, CTRL-ALT-INS would kick my Heath-Zenith 150 PC clone into the ROM monitor. It was handy for software that had traps to foil using debug. I miss that box. (But I'd never go back!)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Delta-9 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Alt-Space N
      Alt-Space X
      Alt-F4"


      I think you missed the point, let me quote it:

      "with 1 push of a keyboard button"

      We all know that windows leusers can't remember more than one key at a time and it has to be labelled.

    10. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Ewan · · Score: 1

      That would be 2 pushes of a keyboard button...

    11. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So get one of those keyboards with the extra configurable buttons (I've got a Compaq one in front of me). And quit being such a whiny baby.

    12. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      X11 puts extra keys on your keyboard? Cool!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    13. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by MadJo · · Score: 1

      only if you use an English Windows version... :)
      what me it is

      Alt-Space N
      Alt-Space M
      Alt F4

      and still I reach for the mouse :(

    14. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got a Microsoft (yeah, yeah, yeah) keyboard that does that.

      The function keys have an extra modifier that is turned on by default. F6 is close and I've reconfigured F5 to minimize. Haven't thought about doing maximize. (Most programs remember the state of the last window you opened, and typically for me that was maximized, so this is not an issue)

      These keyboards are actually pretty nice, with buttons for Windows Media Player on top, and a bunch of other gay little buttons I never use because I forget about them. But it is nice to have the 20 or so totally customizable buttons available when I need them. And for the other users on my computer, hitting the 'my documents' button is easier than finding their files any other way.

      Of course, I always forget about the calculator button and that would actually be the one to save me the most time.

      Keyboards are like a lot of other technology out there- you would be amazed at what exists, if you are willing to try it out.

      As for quality- I've got no problems with this at all, in fact it has a good feel (in my opinion) it's also wireless, which was my number one requirement. I've got too many damn cords behind my computer!

      The only complaint I have, is there is no caps-locks indicator. Maybe they were trying to save battery life or something, but it is nice to have the little light- at least when you are typing in passwords...

      --
      No reason to lie.
    15. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
      That's all well and good, but unfortunately the real problem is when you use a PS/2 to USB converter and plug a Model M into a Mac, you find out that the missing Winderz keys are mapped as the command keys. Oops!

      So while it's normally a plus that Model M keyboards (and I wuv mine all, even the one with a dead left shift key) don't have the evil Winderz keys, it's a minus when you get the bright idea to use one with a KVM switch to hook up all your Macs and PCs to one display.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    16. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by kisrael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In a similar vein...does ANYONE find that "context menu" key useful, the one to the right of the righthand windows key?

      And now that I think about it, how insiduous is it that like every damn PC keyboard made these days gets its own dose of Microsoft branding? That's pretty creepy when I stop to think about it. (I remember my first PC w/ Win95 didn't have that key, so sometimes "ctrl-esc" still comes in useful, like on this one laptop that weirdly moves that key to the top right of the keyboard.)

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    17. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 1
      every few weeks I would remove all the cap keys from my keyboard and clean each one by hand using a bleach solution, inside and out
      Cleaning by hand takes too long. Pop all the caps off, dump them in a large glass or cup, pour in some degreaser (Formula 409 works well), and stir around with a straw. Rinse vigorously.

    18. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Delta-9 · · Score: 1

      "I remember my first PC w/ Win95 didn't have that key, so sometimes "ctrl-esc" still comes in useful, like on this one laptop that weirdly moves that key to the top right of the keyboard."

      For the longest time I still had a keyboard without the windows keys here at work. And because of that I never got used too using them. I still use 'ctrl-esc' in fact I have never once used a windows key to perform a task other than wondering what the hell they do.

      Unfortunately that keyboard died with a spilled soda and I brought my trusty Keytronic Lifetime spare from home into work.

      That should be the next question in this chain: How many of you bring (or acquire via company funds) your favorite keyboard to the workplace to replace the standard Dell/compaq/HP, etc?

    19. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      "In a similar vein...does ANYONE find that "context menu" key useful, the one to the right of the righthand windows key?"

      The context menu button is, IMO, the best thing to happen to keyboards in a long while. For Christ's sake...it's effectively a "right click" mouse button! However, it's on your keyboard - so it's one less reason to take your hands off the keyboard. Brilliant!

    20. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by blankmange · · Score: 1

      I find the context menu keys quite useful for renaming files.

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    21. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just press F2 to rename a file (in Windows, at least).

    22. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by RevDobbs · · Score: 1
      The only complaint I have, is there is no caps-locks indicator.

      There (should) be one on the wireless reciever/dongle thingy; at least there is if you bought the "Wireless Desktop" w/ mouse, too.

      My gripe is that the lights tend to loose state, and sometimes actually reflect the opposite of what is going on. For me, this tends to happen when using the Function Lock key often. ::shrug:: Still a nice package overall... you really can't beat MS mice on MS operating systems.

    23. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by legojenn · · Score: 1

      That should be the next question in this chain: How many of you bring (or acquire via company funds) your favorite keyboard to the workplace to replace the standard Dell/compaq/HP, etc? In my office, you try not to piss off the secretary, that would be me, and I would ensure that it gets on the next office supply order.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    24. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by nosfucious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, seeing as we've plenty of nationalities where I work, I had to insist on a US keboard. (Which is the same as my 'native' Australian keyboard).

      Mostly around here we've Swiss German/French, French and a few Belgian keyboards. Everyone seems to prefer they one they grew up with. Personally, alphabetic characters never bothered me, but I occasionally miss the positions of /\$@ and a few others if I don't work with a US keyboard. I'm fine whether I use VNC, SSH or Terminal Services. Users of other keyboards sometimes find that there are remapping problems, which are either from the application or the OS itself.

      Of course, company std dictates that "US English" be the standard install for NT/2K, at least on a server level. VNC doesn't work so well for a non-US keyboard.

      Drives the French guys nuts trying to hunt and seek for an obscure character combination that I've used in a service password. (Driving the French mad is of course, like 'wiping your arse with silk').

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
    25. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Yep, I managed to get in a very nice Keytronic at my first job after leaving the Air Force, and at a computer shop I worked at for a while, always had ``dibs'' on the wonderful IBM PS/2 and other old / good keyboards. Here at work now got in a MacAlly which is pretty decent (though I've not found a USB keyboard I'm really pleased w/).... and at home, still use my classic old NeXT non-ADB keyboard ;)

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    26. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by kisrael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The context menu button is, IMO, the best thing to happen to keyboards in a long while. For Christ's sake...it's effectively a "right click" mouse button! However, it's on your keyboard - so it's one less reason to take your hands off the keyboard. Brilliant!
      Are you being serious? I hardly find the focus is on what I want to right click on! And usually it's much easier to use the mouse to give the thing the focus than to wrangle the arrow keys and what not...

      Seriously, could you name a few examples of when you're saved from having to reach for the mouse, or when there's not another, more convenient keycombo to get the job done?

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    27. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      In a similar vein...does ANYONE find that "context menu" key useful, the one to the right of the righthand windows key?

      All the time...the less frequently you have to go to the mouse, the better.

      The Model M I'm using now doesn't have the Windows or menu keys on it, but I use RemapKey to remap the right Alt & Ctrl keys (which would otherwise go unused).

      Strangely enough, the Windows key is also useful on a Mac...it does the work of the Open-Apple key on an Apple keyboard (and Alt takes the place of Option). I have some ADB keyboards I could use...and one of them is connected to a Quadra 610. The beige G3 uses a PS/2-to-USB adapter to share the same Focus keyboard and Microsoft optical mouse that are used by my x86 boxen. I don't think the menu key is mapped to anything, though...having it serve as the Reset/Power key would be useful.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    28. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by stephenbooth · · Score: 1
      How many of you bring your favorite keyboard to the workplace to replace the standard Dell/compaq/HP, etc?
      All the time. The one Microsoft product I adore is the 'Natural Keyboard'. I find that my typing speed is much better with one and I don't get pains in my wrists anymore, as I used to with the regular keyboards. I've got 3 of these keyboards: 1 original with a PS2 interface, 1 original (but made by Belkin) with a USB interface and another with a PS2 interface that has extra 'smart keys' that (under windows) I can atach commands to so the one labelled Web/Home opens up Mozilla, the Messenger one opens Yahoo!Chat &c.

      Cool hardware, shame about the software.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    29. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Ironically enough, I bought one of the new-ish IBM keyboards, the Death Star Black model...and while it's alot quieter than the oldschool Unix IBM keyboard I depended on for so long, it just doesn't feel the same. I swear I make more typos on the new black one than I did on the old one. The enter key is a little slim key but the old keyboard had the gigantic, take-up-two-vertical-spaces enter key.

      I'm seriously considering going back to the old noisy weighs-a-ton IBM keyboard.

    30. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by jafuser · · Score: 3, Funny

      I keep all my keys on my Model M at work switched around fairly randomly in what has come to be the "ICOLQZ" layout. Even my boss nor the network admin can use my keyboard, since they both can't touch type.

      So far over the past few years, nobody has messed with my computer, and in the few times that the network admin had to do something, he has me sit down at my computer and do it while he told me what to type =D

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    31. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "In a similar vein...does ANYONE find that "context menu" key useful, the one to the right of the righthand windows key?"

      Hmmm, It's on the right-hand side of the keyboard, it only works in MS-Windows.

      To be using MS-Windows, you will have to be holding a mouse in your right hand...

      So no, it's no use whatever, just like everything else that side of the keyboard. If you're typing (so you can reach it), then the mouse-cursor will be in some random place on the screen, and pressing the menu button will get a menu from wherever the mouse is, i.e. probably not the item you're interested in.

      Unless of course, you happen to be using a keyboard with a touchpad (or a laptop), in which case you can't use menus reliably anyway...

    32. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I see the benefits when I use spreadsheets. There are a number of right-click context menu functions that come in handy.

    33. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by jafuser · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can atach commands to so the one labelled Web/Home opens up Mozilla, the Messenger one opens Yahoo!Chat &c.
      You realize that by not opening IE/MSN Messenger with those buttons, that you are probably violating the DMCA in some way =P

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    34. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by llamaboy487 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that keyboard died with a spilled soda and I brought my trusty Keytronic Lifetime spare from home into work. if you'd had an IBM Model M you could have just put it in the dishwasher...

      --


      ...nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
    35. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      All the time...the less frequently you have to go to the mouse, the better.
      But how often is the focus on the right thing to pull that off? Don't you usually need the mouse to get to thing in the first place?

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    36. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      All the time...the less frequently you have to go to the mouse, the better.

      But how often is the focus on the right thing to pull that off? Don't you usually need the mouse to get to thing in the first place?

      Alt-Tab and Ctrl-Tab are your friends. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    37. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      You can use it in a word processor to right click a word the spellchecker doesn't like to choose from the list of matches in the dictionary.

    38. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone say "F2" ?

    39. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone say "F2" ?

      Good, I knew you could.

    40. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The big example is macros. Much harder to script mouse movement.

    41. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm probably the worst typist in the world.
      I'm the best troubleshooter I know.
      After using my spring hook to remove and place the keys where they belong I'd wrap the keyboard cord around your neck and strangle your ass for wasting my time.

    42. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Quino · · Score: 1

      Funny, just yesterday I found a really old cluncker IBM keyboard that was getting junked and I took it home.

      Man, the thing is heavy, made in the US (really seems to hail from another era!), has the (pleasant to me) click feedback, and it does not have that annoying (to me) windows button. Perfect!

      Anyways, to me it seemed like a good find, and an improvement over the keyboards that you find in stores and what orginally came with my computer (I always assumed most ppl hated the tactile, click feedback and that's why that keyboard design didn't last. But I like it!)

      PS

      At work I also have a black IBM keyboard -- it's OK, and it's nice and compact, but I actually would rather give up some real estate on my desk to have a bigger enter button, and to have the standard Delete, Insert, Home, End layout. Then again, I touch type, use the command line, and usually surf the web using the keyboard -- so I'd wager the keyboard is more important to me than the average persone (who probably prefers using the mouse for everything).

    43. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      You could also change the keyboard setting Dvorak, but not the keyboard itself. Hours of entertainment! Don't forget your key map when you have to fix it though, unless you actually know how to type on a Dvorak.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    44. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by belroth · · Score: 2, Informative
      In explorer I use it to rename files, also lets me used my customised 'send to' to choose which editor I want to use on the file (usually emacs or t.h.e. depending upon task). As my editing is done text-only wherever possible it is very useful.

      I also use a nifty little utility called WinKey which allows you to assign operations to combinations with the 'windows' keys in addition to the standard, e.g. I use win-X to open Excel, win-Z to open mozilla, win-1 to win-0 open explorer windows on network pcs - it all helps me not to use the mouse any more than I have to, and makes my wrists/hands more comfortable.
      Many years ago I wrote an INT19h C hack to assign functions to alt key combinations in DOS - I love coding to save drudgery later. Now you can add shortcut keys to items on the start menu too, the problem is finding ones that aren't used by apps. CTRL+ the numpad keys are usually a safe bet - I use ctrl+numpad to invoke cygwin. I really am a keyboard kind of guy and hate it when I haave to use the mouse, except when I use the wheel to scroll through /. pages :-)

      I have to say if anyone is developing a USB 'natural' version of the Model M I'd be quite happy to test it for a few years...

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    45. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      But how often is the focus on the right thing to pull that off? Don't you usually need the mouse to get to thing in the first place?

      Alt-Tab and Ctrl-Tab are your friends. :-)


      Yes yes yes, I KNOW that. Actually, I'm one of the best "getting around windows without a mouse" people I know, because of years in college when I'd sit way back in a Papasan chair with the keyboard in my lap.

      But what the hell do you FIND on these menus that's useful? For instance, if I press while typing in this textbox, I get Undo, Paste, Delete, Select All- of which have their own accelerators. In general, really only things in explorer and on the desktop are worth right clicking on, and then I'm usually using the mouse anyway.

      Ok, I've found one exception; I do often tab through links, and having a way to get to "Open in New Window" is a little useful (which leads me to another gripe, it was much cooler when Netscape had "open in new window" as the FIRST damn option, rather than the second as it is in IE; seems irritatingly redundant, given that I coulda left clicked just as easily.)

      Still, what's a use for that menu w/ the keyboard, besides maybe open link in new window?

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    46. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by PapaZit · · Score: 1

      The windows key and context menu keys are great!

      I pry 'em off of my keyboards, so when we're all LAN gaming, the other guys scream "DAMN IT! I JUST HIT THE WINDOWS KEY!" and I frag them before they get back into the game. :-)

      --
      Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
    47. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by belroth · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention I have also remapped the AltGr key to the right of the spacebar to be a regualr Alt key so I can use two handed Alt key combinations and not twist my wrist too much. It's a registry hack for 2000, that was a minor irritation to work out - the main problem being finding out the actual scan codes for the keys in windows. Worth it though.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    48. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by belroth · · Score: 1
      you really can't beat MS mice on MS operating systems.
      Unless you like the nice sloping Logitech mice which help keep your wrists from twisting too much. Unless you mouse left-handed I suppose.
      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    49. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by blankmange · · Score: 1
      so 3 AC's chimed in to remind me of the F2 key -- which is the same as the 'rename' function of the context menu button.....

      Nice, especially, since the original question was concerning the context menu button.....

      Don't you love AC's and their insight?
      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    50. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Or, if you're left handed.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    51. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keytronic "Lifetime" keyboards aren't. I've had three keyboards go bad on me. Two Apple "Pro" (one graphite, one white) when I spilt sodas on them - it's hard to blame Apple for that. But the only keyboard ever to die without any abuse and within four months of buying it was a Keytronic "Lifetime" - and I thought I was buying quality. I still have a second one in storage but I've moved on.

      Hecho en Mexico - never again!

    52. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I brought one of my IBM keyboards in from home. They're great. I also liked the ones that Everex (remember them?) shipped with their circa-1993 machines. They were very similar in feel to the IBM ones.

    53. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      But what the hell do you FIND on these menus that's useful?

      It depends on the program...in Visual Studio, for instance, a couple of options that come up if you hit the menu key on a variable let you go to where that variable is declared or defined. Maybe there's a more direct keyboard shortcut that does the same thing, but it's difficult to keep up on every keyboard shortcut for every program (especially for something that's particular to one program).

      I'm not claiming that the menu key is useful everywhere, but your claim that it's useful nowhere doesn't track with my experience. If you don't like it, nobody's forcing you to use it...there's usually more than one way to get something done, and which method someone prefers is likely to be determined by previous experience. (For instance, some people are under the impression that mouse gestures are the greatest thing since sliced bread. This page leads me to believe otherwise...why bother with remembering some squiggle to draw with a mouse to (for instance) change tabs when Ctrl-Tab does the same thing?)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    54. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Tingler · · Score: 1

      (Driving the French mad is of course, like 'wiping your arse with silk').

      Fantastic tie-in. You rock!

    55. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In explorer I use it to rename files

      Dude, F2.

    56. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

      What? The topic was how stupid and useless the windows keys are, and you said that one thing they're useful for was renaming files. But using the "Right-click" key to do that still requires you to select "rename" from the list that pops up; it's faster to just press F2. So it was insightful -- it showed that your example did not stand.

    57. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've found one exception; I do often tab through links, and having a way to get to "Open in New Window" is a little useful"

      In Mozilla, you can set Ctrl-Enter to do that.

    58. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      I'm at IBM right now, and I picked up a model M for this workstation about a month ago. Like many others, it was just lying in the hall.

    59. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      I didn't switch to IE until I discovered shift-click

    60. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      In explorer I use it to rename files, also lets me used my customised 'send to' to choose which editor I want to use on the file (usually emacs or t.h.e. depending upon task).

      The thing is, isn't that context menu for files in explorer pretty big? Seems like that's a lot of keystrokes to get the hilight to what you want...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    61. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      I didn't switch to IE until I discovered shift-click

      Oh, right, RIGHT, thanks.

      shift-enter also works wonders.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    62. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by belroth · · Score: 1
      The thing is, isn't that context menu for files in explorer pretty big? Seems like that's a lot of keystrokes to get the hilight to what you want...
      Yes, especially when you start adding to it, but that's what the shortcut keys are for (the underlined ones in the menus), alternatively tune autorepeat on your keyboard. e.g. reduce the delay and increase the repeat rate. With the shortcuts it's normally 2 keystrokes if it's properly organized, perhaps 3. It's still more convenient for me than moving to the mouse, especially as I am still getting up to speed with emacs..... :-D
      Editing Word or Excel, coding in emacs or t.h.e. are all keyboard tasks and I'm a reasonable typist so the mouse slows me down.

      Having said that I prefer the CapsLock key next to 'A' as that is what I am used to - if I have more keys I try to use them.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    63. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The context menu button is, IMO, the best thing to happen to keyboards

      On a classic keyboard like a M, Shift+F10 does the same thing.

    64. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get the idea that he really enjoys spending hours every couple weeks removing all the germs from his keyboard. Probably right after he shaves off all his body hair and dips his genitals in Clorox.

    65. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Seriously, could you name a few examples of when you're saved from having to reach for the mouse, or when there's not another, more convenient keycombo to get the job done?

      IIRC, Shift+F10 performs the equivalent of a right click.

    66. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by shamino0 · · Score: 1
      In a similar vein...does ANYONE find that "context menu" key useful, the one to the right of the righthand windows key?

      Absolutely, but not for the purpose Microsoft intended.

      In my .Xmodmap file (for XFree86 on Linux), I have the following:

      keycode 64 = Alt_L
      keycode 113 = Alt_R
      keycode 115 = Meta_L
      keycode 116 = Super_R
      keycode 117 = Hyper_R

      clear mod1
      clear mod2
      clear mod3
      clear mod4
      clear mod5
      add mod1 = Meta_L
      add mod2 = Alt_L Alt_R
      add mod3 = Super_R
      add mod4 = Hyper_R

      With all this, the Alt keys send the left-ALT and right-ALT sequences into X (instead of Meta, which is usually the default for those keys). The left Windows key is Meta, the right Windows key is Super, and the Menu key is Hyper.

      For those who don't use X11, Meta, Super and Hyper are three additional shift keys that the X11 standard specifies. A lot of software uses Meta (especially Emacs - which uses it eveywhere), but most programs do not use Super or Hyper, because most keybaords don't have those keys.

      With my .Xmodmap, I get three extra shift keys that I can use when assigning keybaord shortcuts to stuff. I get Alt (which is normally not used, because the physical Alt keys are typically mapped to Meta), Super and Hyper.

      I'm sure Microsoft is busy working out a way to make sure that future keyboards can't be mapped like this, but that's not my problem (yet).

    67. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Rename is on the bottom. It's always the top of the menu that fills out. So right click, up, up, up, and you've got Rename. Or, right click, m.

    68. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, there's only 2 ups in there....

      Even easier to rename files however is by pressing F2.

    69. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleaning too much is actually bad for you, as your skin will go into overload mode and get REALLY greasy if you're cleaning all the time; dries out your skin you see.

      However, I have to shower about 2 times a day to be respectable, although in practice it's more like 1.5 times. I seem to sweat quite a bit during sleep and even though everything looks ok I feel greasy and sweaty, and my hair is a rats nest, no matter what position I sleep in, or on what, or for how long. Always. Even when it's like half an inch long.

    70. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by antirename · · Score: 1

      I love the layout,but the damn things only last six months (if you're lucky). The Natural Elite also has the distinction of being the only keyboard I've ever had that emitted smoke when it failed. Upon dissection, I found that the circuit board had a large hole burned in it under the leds. Yeah, it is nice to use, but the quality is all MS. We have had similar problems at work (all of them failed in less than a year, out of about 50 we bought). I'd look elsewhere if you want an ergonomic keyboard.

    71. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      God yes, I love my IBM model M. Picked it up with a $30 cyrix P233 that's currently filtering packets for me. Metal springs own! It's got a long detachable cord , ps2 style plug, and yes, the keycaps, I love it, sturdy as hell, I wish I had more.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    72. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      For those who don't use X11, Meta, Super and Hyper are three additional shift keys that the X11 standard specifies. A lot of software uses Meta (especially Emacs - which uses it eveywhere), but most programs do not use Super or Hyper, because most keybaords don't have those keys.

      If I had to guess, I'd say there are more reasons than that not to have so many difficult-to-conceptualize-the-difference-of modifier keys...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    73. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by blankmange · · Score: 1
      My reply about the context menu button was in response to this posting:

      "In a similar vein...does ANYONE find that "context menu" key useful, the one to the right of the righthand windows key?" The context menu button is, IMO, the best thing to happen to keyboards in a long while. For Christ's sake...it's effectively a "right click" mouse button! However, it's on your keyboard - so it's one less reason to take your hands off the keyboard. Brilliant!

      Nothing was mentioned about the windows keys, just the context menu button. Granted, it is the same as a right click on the mouse (thank you for pointing that out....), but the question remained if anyone found the key useful or not...
      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    74. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the best of both worlds -- a compact model M (like a regular model M with the numeric key pad lopped off).

    75. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by dododge · · Score: 1
      What we need are the _[]x window buttons on the keyboard so that we can minimize, maxamize and close windows with 1 push of a keyboard button.

      Imagine a keyboard even wider than a typical PC keyboard, with an extra keypad on the left side plus a few extra keys scattered here and there. Keys such as:

      • insert/mark
      • delete line
      • delete character
      • cut/copy
      • undo/paste
      • move/grow (for adjusting window placement)
      • start of line
      • end of line
      • page left
      • page right
      • go to next window (sort of like alt-tab)
      • repeat
      • pop (for raising/lowering windows)
      • again
      • read file
      • save/edit
      • abort/exit
      • help/hold (sort of like scroll lock)
      • enter command or start shell

      This keyboard is what you might find attached to an Apollo system. Apollo made graphical Unix workstations in the 1980's, competing mainly with Sun. They had a custom GUI environment dating back to maybe 1983, if not earlier. Pretty much the entire interface, including window management, could be done from the keyboard if you so desired. The GUI had a macro layer between the keyboard and applications, so you could reprogram/remap the keys on a per-user basis.

      Apollo keyboards also typically had the control key next to the caps lock key, which works for both emacs users and non-typists who can't deal with a shift key.

      HP bought the company and phased out the hardware (and Apollo's operating system) during the 90's. Unfortunately I believe these keyboards, as with everything else Apollo did, were extremely proprietary. For example last I checked you could run the BSDs on some HP/Apollo hardware but only if you were using the "HP-UX" model keyboard instead.

    76. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      My son lives over a computer shop and scored an old NEC keyboard out of their rubbish bin for me ... it's so nice to use, positive feedback, a nice healthy 'click' on each keystroke, a real pleasure.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    77. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      That's strange. I've had the same original Natural keyboard since '97. Guess I've been lucky on that count so far.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    78. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Alt-Space N - Agra_N_dir
      Alt-Space X - Does nothing for me

      Maybe you meant

      Alt-Space U - Red_U_ire
      Alt-Space N - Agra_N_dir

      Or did you think all Windows systems use the same shortcuts?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    79. Re:I loved the IBM model M keyboard key caps... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1
      I'm at IBM right now, and I picked up a model M for this workstation about a month ago. Like many others, it was just lying in the hall.
      For some reason your comment makes me think of the Simpsons episode with 'The land of chocolate'...
      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  3. Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by ACK!! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I loved mine and I am still looking for one of those old clickity clackity huge heavy monsters with their wonderous tactile feedback feel.

    Anyone else in the same boat?

    At least I still have my Logitech 3 button mouse.

    What is your favorite keyboard type?

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Havokmon · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I loved mine and I am still looking for one of those old clickity clackity huge heavy monsters with their wonderous tactile feedback feel.

      I picked up 3 or 4 of them at GoodWill last year for $1.50 each.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    2. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by stanmann · · Score: 5, Informative

      Go to ebay type in IBM Model M in the search. buy keyboard. or search your local goodwill/Salvation army stores. I've got two, both from goodwill. like a rock.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    3. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe what you're looking for is the replacement for the Northgate Omnikey. Lueck Data Systems makes a replacement and still has a few of the old ones available. Function keys on the left, where god intended them. Or function keys on both the left and top, for those unsure about life. A heavy metal chassis. Clicks rather than mush. http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/en-us/hardware/key boards/

    4. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Havokmon · · Score: 4, Funny
      Function keys on the left, where god intended them.

      heh, 10 function keys, 10 commandments.. that can't be a coincidence :P

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    5. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Warpedcow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out www.pckeyboard.com - they have it all! I bought a lexmark mini-clikey-key keyboard a few years ago and I'll probably buy another pretty soon.
      ________________________________________

      I loved mine and I am still looking for one of those old clickity clackity huge heavy monsters with their wonderous tactile feedback feel.

      Anyone else in the same boat?

      At least I still have my Logitech 3 button mouse.

      What is your favorite keyboard type?

      --
      moo
    6. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am a die-hard M Fanatic. So is a buddy of mine.

      We scour local flea markets, garage sales and auctions for people getting rid of them.

      This year, I scored three at three seperate garage sales. $5, $2, $2 !

      I've got about 10 now, and I put one with every computer I use.

      My co-workers used to rile me about the noise, but after I started hitting them over the head with it, they stopped complaining. :)

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    7. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      10 fingers? 10 toes!? 10 dollars to my name!?!?!?

      AAAAAACCCCCKKKKK!

      Praise Jesus!!!!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Informative
      You still run across them from time to time in IBM.

      Logitech makes a pretty good keyboard, too. I picked one up after deciding that the split ergonomic keyboard I'd been using 1) sucked and 2) was making my wrists and hands hurt more. I'm on a logitech flat keyboard now and am loving it. It's nice and clicky, stands up to abuse and I can type about a third faster on it.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    9. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Tycho · · Score: 1

      I always liked the Apple Extended Keyboard II. Unfortunatly the Apple keyboard uses ADB and an iMate USB to ADB adaptor runs about $40. I also like old Northgate keyboards, which use the same Alps mechanical keyswitches and is an AT keyboard. However, the Apple keyboard uses rubber spacers that reduce noise. Both the Northgate and the Apple keyboards can be thrown off a buildting. Micro Connectors also makes a new keyboard with mechanical keyswitches that is not as quiet or as sturdy as the Apple keyboard. For that matter the Micro Connectors keyboard costs about as much new as what a used Apple keyboard and a USB to ADB adaptor would cost.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    10. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Tandy Model 3 keyboard was the best that I can remember. It had grained keys and clicked sharply. Too bad it was attached to the "tube" (us old guys say "tube" for CRT).

      I actually have a old metal Dell Keyboard at home. Now that thing is a hoss. It takes up half the desk. You could fit a motherboard in it.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    11. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Love my cast-off IBM keyboards. At work, they kept "upgrading" to compaq machines, and with them, the mushy keyboards. I would collect all the old IBM boards, even the hopeless ones full of coffee, etc.

      They clean up easily, work forever, and don't skte across the desk.

      But my favorite ones are the 3 IBM trackpoint keyboards that were ordered by one of the sales-wonks. Two of them were new-in-box, as they were being tossed for not having a Windows key!
      They are my favorite, now I never have to find the friggin mouse!

    12. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I chunked down some good money for an old IBM keyboard a few years ago. Not long after, I spilled a drink on the spacebar. Now the spacebar won't go. Even old clickitty clackitty IBM keyboards are pretty lame, without a spacebar.

    13. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by questamor · · Score: 1

      I've liked 2 keyboards, one the old IBM noisy ones, and the other is the (considerably softer) apple pro keyboard - both are just comfy to type on for me.

      The worst ones were university keyboards on the first unix machines I used, which had odd half keytops, red lettering, were made with a more unix comfy layout than the PC keyboards of the day, and were so soft & squishy I found them almost unusable. I'd love to find out who made those - it's one of those little facts I can always -almost- remember, but never comes to me. Anyone else know the ones I described?

    14. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, you could run it through the dishwasher, or you could take it apart and clean it with a powerhose.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    15. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by skurk · · Score: 1

      ACK!! wrote:
      > Anyone else in the same boat?

      But ofcourse. I love old keyboards, only with a few exceptions. :-)

      > At least I still have my Logitech 3 button mouse.

      Me too. Now, I must admit that I'm very oldskool, but I never got used to the scroll wheel/third button combination on the mouse.

      At work, I use a Mac which has a optical IntelliMouse attached. Each time I try to paste something with the middle button, I end up scrolling several pages in either direction :)

      (Then again, you have the users who are addicted to the scroll wheel, and scroll like crazy to reach the bottom of a 200 pages long document)

      > What is your favorite keyboard type?

      I love The Happy Hacking Keyboard, which I use at home. It is, IMHO, as close to perfect as it gets. No caps lock, no Windows keys. and the CTRL is where it belongs - right next to the "A".

      Who put the important CTRL key all the way down there?

      --
      www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
    16. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Delta-9 · · Score: 1


      "What is your favorite keyboard type?"

      This Keytronic Lifetime keyboard is my favorite keyboard. It has the big, longer ( but not backwards-L shaped) enter key, large backspace and large \ key. My only complaint is the stupid windows keys.

    17. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. I have F2 bound to "worship graven idol".

    18. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Sarin · · Score: 1

      you could order an Omnikey Customizer board from http://www.pckeyboard.com ; they sell new keyboards made to the original Model M specifications, and this particular model (sometimes referred to as "Linux 101") puts Control where it belongs - and as a bonus, also moves Escape to a location where it's far more accessible for touch typists.

    19. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm utterly amazed that in the 14 replies thus far, nobody's given you the right answer.

      If you want a true, original IBM PC keyboard then go here. They make the originals, complete with massive weight and key klacking, plus modified versions that have the Windows key, integrated mouse, college mascot/color inspired ones, quiet versions, etc... yes, they're pricy by modern day keyboard standards, but if you want a keyboard that will live somewhat longer than all of your descendants there's no other option.

      I actually have two original IBM PS/2 keyboards, bought from used computer stores nearby... but the noise annoyed the hell out of my wife and I recently switched to a Memorex multimedia keyboard. It's really not all that bad, and every once in a great while I even remember to use some of the extra keys on it.

    20. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Arend · · Score: 1

      I don't miss it. I use one..

      The keyboard I'm using rightnow is the same one I've used for 4 years in a row and my boss had used it for a few years too. It seems to be built in 1992. I've had 2 computers and 3 screens during those 4 years but no new keyboard for me, thanks.

      A few months ago, I was very lucky. The company on the floor below us dumped a whole lot of IBM computers _with_ keyboards in the garbage.
      I fished 10 of them out of the container. Unfortunately 9 of them have a Dutch layout, but ya can't beat the price...

    21. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Plus there is a mini model-M for those with limited desk space. The only drawback is that most minis I've found don't have removable key caps like the full size units have.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    22. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by zenyu · · Score: 1

      I actually have two original IBM PS/2 keyboards, bought from used computer stores nearby... but the noise annoyed the hell out of my wife and I recently switched to a Memorex multimedia keyboard. It's really not all that bad, and every once in a great while I even remember to use some of the extra keys on it.

      Man I threw out my IBM PS/2 four years ago cuz the girlfriend couldn't sleep and I was moving so I felt carrying one more 10 lb computer component was a bit too much (I threw away other computer things like all those ISA bus components in the junk drawer, except for the Soundblaster..) Now the girlfriend is gone, something about needing to sow her oats and not being ready for marrage in addition with a high disregard for the idea of someday living in Silicon Valley, where she now lives. I really miss the keyboard. I bought one of those "Hacker" keyboards. I like the form factor but it's too light and the feel is all wrong.

    23. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have one, from the original IBM PC-XT. It's a wonderful, solid keyboard, that doubles as a home-defence system (just hit the intruder with it).

      Seriously, this was a *solid* keyboard - 20 years later it's still more reliable than some "new" keyboards fresh out of the box.

      But there's none of them fancy "Windows" keys on it - it's a pure 101-key keyboard (used to have an 88-key keyboard as well...)

    24. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      I'm also a fan of the Apple Extended Keyboard II; although I also like the M the Apple had a tighter feel that didn't make nearly as much noise. Anyone know if the iMate ADB->USB adaptor can be used to run the Apple with a PC running Linux?

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    25. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by szquirrel · · Score: 1

      Or you could simply go to eBay and type IBM Model M. Old authentic Model Ms can easily be had for $15 plus shipping. That's a damn sight better than the $49 "sale price" PCKeyboard wants to charge you.

      --
      Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
    26. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      I actually have a old metal Dell Keyboard at home. Now that thing is a hoss. It takes up half the desk. You could fit a motherboard in it.

      Sounds like an interesting mod to me...

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    27. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by cindy · · Score: 1

      I was starting to have problems with my wrists and I began to suspect that the "bouncy" feel of the keyboards I was using might be part of the problem. I remembered that KeyTronic used to make a really nice keyboard with switches for each key rather than a membrane. I went to their web site and ordered their "best" model and was really disappointed to find that it was a membrane keyboard and was just as bouncy as the ones I'd been using. I called up KeyTronic to complain and got to talking with the sales guy on the phone. I explained what I wanted and he said they didn't officially make the switched keyboards I wanted any more, but that they still had some in stock and he could could get one put together for me with the light touch key switches I wanted. I sent back the one I'd ordered and in about a week I received a new "KB101" with the best touch of any keyboard I've ever used. None of this "ergonomic" silliness, just a good old fashioned 101 key IBM style keyboard that doesn't kick back when you press the keys. My wrists never felt better!

      Kudos to KeyTronic for outstanding customer service!!!

    28. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Watch out, though -- lots of the keyboards being sold on eBay are there because they have nonstandard connectors and therefore are pretty much useless. (I bought some from someone who claimed that the keyboards had PS/2 connectors -- They turned out to have some weird connector; like the AT ones but with slightly different pin placement.) I'd recommend going for the thrift stores instead; finding out that you paid shipping on a five pound paperweight is annoying.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    29. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      The original IBM 101 (predecessor to the M). It came with the IBM PC-AT 339. I loved that keyboard!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    30. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun Type 6 USB.

    31. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by colmore · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you who doesn't love the Model-M... my college roommate, poor bastard has the head of his bed right next to my desk. i'm not an ass about it, but sometimes he tries to sleep until 2:00 and i've got work to do. click click click click... last i checked they were $5 on ebay. I love this beast.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    32. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by vought · · Score: 1
      I actually have a old metal Dell Keyboard at home. Now that thing is a hoss. It takes up half the desk. You could fit a motherboard in it.

      Sounds like an interesting mod to me...


      Sounds like a 17" PowerBook to me!

    33. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not miss them.
      I used to miss them - then it hit me....hey why don't I buy one!!!
      I bought 6 from ebay.

      --
      ac

    34. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      At work I use an IBM AT keyboard (84-key) that was made in the mid 1980s. That I migrated it through all my machine upgrades over the years, implies my opinion about it. I tend to joke about how this keyboard's end-of-life coincides with Sol going red giant.

      One problem with 84-key keyboards, though, is that some X stuff doesn't work quite right with the arrows. Some library somewhere isn't handling that the state of the NumLock correctly (or some problem like that) so when I try to use the arrow keys, it gets confused. But not everything. For example, in Galeon, in the text box where I am entering this Slashdot comment, I can use my arrow keys and they work the way one would expect, moving my cursor. But in the URL widget at the top of my Galeon window, pressing a right arrow moves my focus to another widget instead of moving the cursor to the right.

      At home I use a Unicomp Linux 101 buckling spring (with the Ctrl key right next to letter A, where it belongs). Made in Louisville Kentucky. This has the approximate feel of the IBM keyboard -- not quite as good, but good enough. Since it has the seperate arrows vs numeric keypad, I don't have the arrow problems that I mention above. It's also not nearly as heavy as the IBM keyboard and while it does seem more rugged that most keyboards I have seen, I doubt it'll last two decades like the IBM has.

      To be fair, though, my home keyboards get a lot more abuse than the ones at work. There aren't cats (at least in the office) at work. But at home, I have serious problems with cat hair, and that really matters. I'm not kidding. My little buddy is part Persian and damn, long cat hair gets into everything and really wreaks havoc with keyboards. Also, I'm more of a slob at home and sometimes eat in front of the computer, spill coke, etc. Spilled coffee at work (black, no sugar, etc) doesn't phase the IBM at all. So it's hard to compare keyboards that are used at the two different sites.

      The obvious thing for me to do, when that Unicomp croaks, is to get one of those legendary model Ms that everyone's always talking about. Then I can have IBM heavy metal but also better layout. Then we'll see if 1980s IBM quality is up to the cat+slob challenge.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    35. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by llamaboy487 · · Score: 1

      yeah i found my model M's in an attic, and they were rather dirty... i ran them through the dishwasher and then ran just the key caps through again. They work fine and are beautiful now. Also when i was taking them from my work to my car, i dropped one down into the loading dock form a stairway (about 8 feet) and it didnt affect it in the slightest way!

      --


      ...nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
    36. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      something about needing to sow her oats

      If she's had to go off and sowing wild oats in a furrow some where, she's probably not a girl.

    37. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I do, have a 1998 version with full mechanical switches inside (great tactile feel, if a bit rough on the hands/fingers due to the forces involved). Kind of dread the day that it stops working and I have to go fishing for a replacement.

      However, I also do a lot of typing on my Toshiba Tecra 9200, and I miss the trackpoint in the middle when I switch over to the desktop. While I also use an external USB mouse with the laptop, sometimes it's just darn handy to be able to nudge the mouse around without taking my hands off the keyboard.

      That being said - I've been drooling over the IBM TrackPoint keyboards for a few months now as a way to have that nubber at my fingertips when I'm on the desktop(s). Are they full mechanical, or mushy membrane? Can't decide whether they're worth the $200(?) each.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    38. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      My old model m keyboard does not have the ps/2 connector but something that looks like an rj45 plug head. Do they sell adaptors for these? I'd love to use my old keyboard from 1991 again.

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    39. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ebay has a boatload of them. $12 plus shipping. Tear it up!

    40. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      I don't miss the old IBM keyboards, because I use one at home. It's *LOUD*, and I love typing on it. While it's fiendishly difficult to find them anymore, we *have* been able to find a copy of them that seems about as well (and heavily) built as they are -- the Customizer, from PCKeyboard (http://www.pckeyboard.com/customizer.html). We've been using these for a while with VERY good results.

    41. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      This is what we call "what goes around, comes around".

      Never let your (especially computer illiterate) girlfriend determine what perhiperials are best for your computer.

      It disheartens me immensely to know that yet antoher Model M has slipped into a landfill somewhere =(

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    42. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe the connector is purposefully removable, just like the keys. You will have to purchase one, or look up the schematic and wire it up yourself.

      You can get either an AT or PS/2 version of that connector though.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    43. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      What is your favorite keyboard type?

      Anything without those darn Windows keys. I hate when playing my game of choice, in the heat of battle struggle to find the ctrl key next to alt (like I became accustomed to in Doom) and then after a delay I am looking at the desktop!

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    44. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Funny

      There were originally 15 Commandments.

    45. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1
      amen. I have two model M's, one of which has a "Boss" key (the + on the numeric keypad). It's great for surfing /. on the sly at work. Or would be if I had a real job. Instead of living in BFE. Where the only industries are textiles, furniture and tobacco. But I do have ready access to Model M keyboards. Because all those monoliths of early industrialism are going belly-up.

      Go ahead, waste a mod point making me "off-topic" instead of actually doing your real job, finding and rewarding good posts. Eventually you'll get tired of all those "unfair" metamods and stop.

      jaz

      --
      Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
    46. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

      Someone once unloaded a metric assload of old XTs on me each with a Model M. I got a couple of the mini-m's too... these one's have the keycaps :)

      I'm down to my last one now (damn me for being so generous)

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    47. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by peu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't miss mine, I'm using the same keyboard since 1985 (18 years), every now and then I remove all the keycaps and clean one by one with detergent. The only modification I made is to replace the original upper side of the keyboard with one from a ps/2 with the status leds.

      If I ever need a 'rug' most of my hair is in between the keys... :-)

    48. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I don't use mice. So I use a Logitech 3 button Trackman Marble. They don't make this anymore, so I bought three of them on eBay while I had the chance (one of which had never been used). These things are great. It takes about five minutes to get used to them, but after that nothing else in the world will do.

      You rest your hand on it and then never move it again. The curve of the trackman is shallow so that your hand rests on it naturally, instead of like the newer models where it feels like you have to grab it.

      And of course, the three buttons! Clicking a scroll wheel is like kissing your sister, it just isn't the same. And of course, scrolling a scrollwheel is for those that never figured out that the scrollbar is an interactive control... With the trackman, the marble is the scrollwheel only better!

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    49. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by operagost · · Score: 1

      +1, Mel Brooks reference

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    50. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by operagost · · Score: 1

      I don't think they could have been XTs- those used a different I/O chip and keyboard controller. Unless they had some sort of XT/AT switch on them, like the Taiwanese Model M knockoff I have in my closet. Maybe they were PS/2 Model 30s? Those have 8086's in them, but they aren't XTs (which referred to the motherboard design and hard disk, not the CPU).

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    51. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      Here's what I'm worried about--what will we do in 3-4 years when new computers stop coming with ps/2 ports? Are there usb to ps/2 adaptors? If not, there's a business for you.

      Me, I grew up on these key boards, never used anything different until college. Didn't realize it until sophomore year, when I was typing and suddenly realized my keyboard.. sucked. really sucked.

      Bought a lot of 5 off ebay the next day.

      Working at IBM now, you should see the surplus store...

    52. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Or just buy the cables

      1334026 IBM PS/2 5' Coiled Keyboard Cable
      1393120 IBM PS/2 10' Coiled Keyboard Cable

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    53. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by BigRedFish · · Score: 1

      What is your favorite keyboard type?

      Northgate Omnikey. Wish I'd bought a truckload of the Ultra model before they faded to black. Two complete sets of FN keys (one set programmable), two complete keypads (one for arrows and one for numbers - hasta la vista, Num Lock), and a nice mechanical clicky-clacky feel. And no sodding Windows keys!

    54. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by rbullo · · Score: 1

      The Happy Hacking Keyboard is good if your desk is starved for space, but I prefer one with arrow keys and a number pad. So I use the Linux 101 from PCKeyboard.com. This keyboard basically just rearranges the CTRL, ALT, and Caps Lock keys- layout 1 basically rotates them clockwise, while layout 2 switches the CTRL and Caps Lock keys.

      --
      OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
    55. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look for a "TrackPoint II", which is based on the Model M.

    56. Re:Who else misses the old IBM keyboards? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I don't believe IBM makes buckling spring keyboards any more - they spun off the technology as part of Lexmark, who later sold it to Unicomp, who still sell the keyboards but at a fairly high price.

      But surprisingly I did find some made-in-China Windows keyboards that have buckling spring and removable keys. (The Model M has both removable keycaps and removable keys revealing the spring underneath - the clone keyboard didn't have the separate keycaps.) Not as good as a real Model M but not bad.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  4. My favorite keyboard by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    was the ones that came with the orignal XT. It weighed more than most PCs do today, but had wonderful scuplted keys and a great tactile feel, rather like the selectric ball typewriters they sold back then.

    The original MAC keyboards made a rather strange sound when you typed quickly, you could hear the springs creaking.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:My favorite keyboard by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just bought a new, out of the box original XT style keyboard... (XT style because the keyboard is built the same way, except it has a PS/2 style connection instead of the original connector).

      5 bucks... and I was more than happy to send my plasticky dell keyb to the closet...
      They are great, you can spill beer on them and they survive, and heavy enough to use as weapon if needed...

    2. Re:My favorite keyboard by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      XT style? The first XT keyboards had 88 keys, and connected with a Din-5 that doesn't work with modern machines

    3. Re:My favorite keyboard by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1


      You used to be able to get an adaptor, because the original keyboard connectors were huge round thinggies - Not the dainty little things they use today. You almost think it was designed mil/spec for army field usage or something. I haven't seen one in many years. If it doesn't work anymore, I would suspect that the original keyboards simply suck too much power to drive all that discrete logic. Newer motherboards are designed anticipating a very light power draw from the keyboard and mouse.

      They keybord itself used magnets on each key and reed switches - something that would prohibitively expensive today. That did much to help make the keyboard heavy and thick.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    4. Re:My favorite keyboard by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      You used to be able to get an adaptor, because the original keyboard connectors were huge round thinggies - Not the dainty little things they use today.

      Both the XT and AT used a DIN-5 (the huge round thingies), but wired differently. I think somewhere I still have an 88-key model with a switch on the bottom for "XT" or "AT". The AT-style, you can stick an adaptor on to connect to a PS/2 socket (and then another adaptor to connect to a USB port, if you're so inclined).

      This is being typed on an old "Suntouch" keyboard by SIIG - clicky, but not as clicky as the model M. Swtiches, no membranes. DIN-5 connector (with PS/2 adaptor). No Windows keys. Love it.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:My favorite keyboard by smilingirl · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I love my Dell QuietKey keyboard. I don't understand why everyone is raving about those old IBM keyboards. Not only were they loud, but it takes a little more force to push down on those keys, which hinders my typing speed. I type *extremely* fast on my Dell QuietKey and it is very comfortable for my tiny fingers. I have very small girly fingers, and a smaller keyboard with easier-to-push keys is great for me. Plus, it's quiet, which is nice for my poor roommate in the old dorm room. And its smaller size means more space on the tiny desk in the dorm room. Those old IBM keyboards are so archaic.

      But maybe that's just me.

      --
      The Present is the point at which time touches eternity. - C.S. Lewis
  5. Ygo;k Rs;k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    That'd be "First Post" if I had a real keyboard.

  6. Not a lot of new information? by Soft · · Score: 5, Funny

    No new information in a history of something? How surprising!

    1. Re:Not a lot of new information? by SvendTofte · · Score: 1

      What a boring story. First off, who doesn't know about Dvorak/QWERTY by now? Boring.

      Second, that article is about as contentless as the average EULA from Microsoft.

      Let's take a look at why these keyboards are quiet, and what the keyboards are sacrificing, if anything, to obtain this quietness.

      Great, WHY DONT YOU THEN?
      He doesn't. He shows us alot of images, and tells us what the keyboards are made off. End of story. Oops, yeah, forgot about the actual "sacrifice" part. But who was paying attention anyway?

    2. Re:Not a lot of new information? by shrikel · · Score: 1
      No new information in a history of something? How surprising!

      By definition, history is comprised solely of OLD information.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    3. Re:Not a lot of new information? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 3, Funny

      By definition, history is comprised solely of OLD information.

      Well donbe for killing the joke einstein.

  7. Old Keyboards by Matrix272 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah yes, the keyboards of old could be thrown from a 747 into the middle of the Pacifac, and when they washed ashore, they would still function... but they didn't have an E-mail button. After all, what good is a keyboard without an E-mail button?

    --
    "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    1. Re:Old Keyboards by Farnite · · Score: 1, Insightful

      God I hate my email button my my keyboard at work, I always seem to manage to push it at precisely the wrong moments. Handy? 10% of the time. 90% Annoying.

    2. Re:Old Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why don't you just disable it?

    3. Re:Old Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Gary Penn (of Crash64 fame) had this habit of using a large screwdriver to remove the 'Windows' keys between Ctrl and Alt :-) Can't say I blame him. I'll stick with my non-email, non-windows buttoned keyboard thanks! my personal favorite: SGI's nice big clunky keyboards. I think Dell may have bought their older design from them.

    4. Re:Old Keyboards by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Old keyboards sink. Thats the *REAL* reason they went back to the titanic ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Old Keyboards by Farnite · · Score: 0

      Because I do use it sometimes, notice the 10%

    6. Re:Old Keyboards by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      An email button? That's nothing. My keyboard has a "shopping" button. (I think I have it set to open up freshmeat, but even so, I never use that feature.) Plus it has a scroll wheel, fast forward, rewind, play, and stop controls. It's not quite as rococo as those new Microsoft "Office" keyboards, but every time I sit down at my desk, I feel like I'm really using one of these Vroom, Vroom !

    7. Re:Old Keyboards by Oaktree_b · · Score: 1

      Only problem I have with that stupid Windows key (besides never using it) is that when I used to play Duke 3d, you'd hit it instead of Alt (the fire button)and it would load up the Start Menu. It would completely ruin the experience... Sorry Mr. Alien, I have to type a Word letter, just a moment please :)

      --
      ------ Will of Iron, Knees of Jello.
  8. Works even now... by jkrise · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Back in my day, we had our BS technology..which allowed 'em to be thrown off a 3-story building and still work"

    If you throw BS off a 3-story building, it sure is guarnteed to work! Even now, I swear!! If you have any doubts, ask SCO.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Works even now... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      If you throw BS off a 3-story building, it sure is guarnteed to work! Even now, I swear!! If you have any doubts, ask SCO.

      Just don't expect it to stick to anything on the way down.

  9. Bad layout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thing I never understood about modern computer keyboards is the staggered layout of the rows -- presumably a throwback from old typewriter days, but I think they'd be far more efficient if the keys were arranged in a proper grid (ie the H directly beneath the Y, and not slightly to the right).

    1. Re:Bad layout by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Umm isn't it because your fingers are supposed to come in at an angle (a 'natural keyboard fasciliates this even better) ?

    2. Re:Bad layout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then why are the angles on the left and right different? The Y is only slightly to the left of the H, but the T is twice as far to the right of the F.

      Typed on my Lexmark clickety-clack keyboard. I have 10 more new in the box, in case anything happens to this baby.

    3. Re:Bad layout by frankc · · Score: 1

      One of the things that the Kinesis ergo elan keyboard has done right (i'm typing this on one of those)

    4. Re:Bad layout by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1
      Then, you'd prefer my personal favorite keyboard, the Commodore PET keyboard.

      Can someone find a link to modify one to work with a PS2?

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    5. Re:Bad layout by Confused · · Score: 5, Informative

      You obviously never had to type on a grid keyboard. If you're built like the average human, when the fingers of both hands on the keyboard, the arms are at an angel (45 to 60 degree) relative to the keyboard.

      Staggering the keys allows you to reach the keys on the other rows by simply extending or moving back the finger. No rotation is necessary for most letters. With perfect grid layouts, the finger movement is far more complex and the chance of hitting the correct is greatly reduced.

      So called ergonomic keyboards try to solve the problem by splitting the keyboard and rotating the halves.

      Except for very crude typing requirements, nobody in his right mind uses a grid layout.

    6. Re:Bad layout by Newander · · Score: 1

      Oh my dear God!
      How can you stand it?

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    7. Re:Bad layout by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      I know it is probably heretical to say this on Slashdot, particularly since I have not used any other Microsoft product on my computers since 1995, but I really like the MS Natural keyboard (the curvy one, with the split left/right sides).

      It takes a while to get used to, but it's a nice piece of equipment. This one is 6 years old and still as good as new. I think the more recent models have acquired a number of silly and unnecessary buttons, though, which is a bit of a shame.

    8. Re:Bad layout by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Thing I never understood about modern computer keyboards is the staggered layout of the rows -- presumably a throwback from old typewriter days

      That's exactly it. Each key was actually on the end of a long mechanical lever and those levers couldn't be right on top of one another; hence the slight staggering of the keys.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:Bad layout by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      I also enjoy MS hardware - mice and keyboards. The one thing I like about the "silly unnecessary buttons" is that one of em opens email for me at a touch of a button. Previously I had some of the stupid browser keys mapped to "minimize all windows" - before I learned that Windowskey - M does the same function.

      Of course I enjoy MS software too.

    10. Re:Bad layout by zaxus · · Score: 1

      Kudos to you for using it.

      That thing would drive me bananas.

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
  10. You Tease by tomzyk · · Score: 4, Funny
    Back in my day, we had our BS technology; our keyboards had chassis's which allowed 'em to be thrown off a 3-story building and still work - barely dented. Yes those were the days." Not a lot of new information, but some good visuals.
    Was anyone else expecting to see pics/vids of keyboards being thrown from the rooftops?
    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:You Tease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...yes. And I must say I was rather disappointed.

  11. A real keyboard by pytheron · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... was embedded into the computer, like the trusty Amiga had ! How we all miss those

    --
    "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" [William Shakespeare]
    1. Re:A real keyboard by tbase · · Score: 1

      ...was the keyboard... like my old Vic20 :-)

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    2. Re:A real keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atari 1200XL, now that was one great computer keyboard.

    3. Re:A real keyboard by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1
      A REAL embedded keyboard was the Keytronics model built into my TRS-80 Model I.

      Gee, I miss that keyboard. Much better "clickity-clack" than that mushy Model-M keyboard.

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    4. Re:A real keyboard by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I think I broke more than one C64 trying to hit the Reset hard enough to get it to work.

    5. Re:A real keyboard by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Wimp! The Sinclair ZX-81 had a much better embedded keyboard!

      Let's see... 1983, $40 at K-Mart. Plus another $40 for the 16K RAM upgrade.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    6. Re:A real keyboard by GoldMace · · Score: 1

      ...or the TI-99/4A.

      Now that was a nice keyboard. It just felt much better than these separate keyboards, and it was also up a bit higher from the desk because it was thicker, and it was black.

  12. back in my day by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Funny
    our keyboards had chassis's which allowed 'em to be thrown off a 3-story building and still work - barely dented.

    They also weighed more than the CRT, and easily drowned out my Adlib soundcard when I went up to 60 wpm.

    1. Re:back in my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Adlib soundcard? Geeze, in MY days we didn't have 11 voices (in 'percussion' mode, 9 voices in 'melodic' mode) and were quite happy with our 3-voices Tandy 1000 PCs.

      But at least those old Tandy 1000 keyboards were quite good too!

    2. Re:back in my day by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      They also weighed more than the CRT, and easily drowned out my Adlib soundcard when I went up to 60 wpm.

      Umm yeah, the rest of us bought amplified speakers. ;)

      But I can relate. A friend and I used to play 2 on 2 Descent games. We had this great invention for 'Real Time Chat' in DOS, a second phone line. I had a headset, and he used a speaker phone. His mic was right next to his klunker keyboard, and I could hardly hear what he was saying when he'd start smacking the keys ;)

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    3. Re:back in my day by nycsubway · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you are thinking of the AT keyboard, or the old terminal keyboard, with the F-keys in two columns on the left side.

      I remember those... solid steel back, cast aluminum casing. Painted a dull beige, with a cord as thick as a 3-prong extension cord. And large plastic knobs on the sides to turn the keyboard props up in the back.

      I had an opportunity a few years ago to take one home and play with it. Well, I didn't use it because the plug was an AT style, so I decided to put it to the test against an IBM M-style keyboard. Head to head to see who would win. You know who won? The terminal keyboard.. beat the ever-living crap out of the M-style. Dropping the M style onto the terminal from a height of 5 feet did nothing to it. Dropping the terminal from the same height depressed a few keys irreversibly on the M keyboard.

      The old terminal keyboards are built like tanks! you could probably bridge a gap and stand on it without it breaking. Too bad they're not very useful anymore.

  13. just a few years ago by kguilber · · Score: 2, Funny

    we used to have keyboard sword-fights with DEC terminal keyboards.

    1. Re:just a few years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      *cough* geek! *cough*

    2. Re:just a few years ago by operagost · · Score: 1
      I really liked the VT100 keyboards. They must have had Ford F-150 coil springs under the keys. You had to pound the shit out of them. Totally non-ergonomic.

      Worst ... keyboard ... ever!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  14. IBM Model M by badasscat · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can have my IBM Model M when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

    1. Re:IBM Model M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can be arranged :->

    2. Re:IBM Model M by UnclePaeng · · Score: 1
      You can have my IBM Model M when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
      Yeah, carpal tunnel syndrome from these keyboards can do that to your hands.
    3. Re:IBM Model M by starseeker · · Score: 1


      Your proposal is... acceptible. ;-)

      --
      "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
  15. full text of article (sans images) ... by ih8apple · · Score: 4, Informative

    Today's keyboards aren't what they used to be, no sir! Back in my day, we had our BS technology; our keyboards had chassis's which allowed 'em to be thrown off a 3-story building and still work - barely dented. Yes those were the days. Now we've got these newfangled Wireless Ergonomic E-Mail button membrane keyboards. To heck with them, I say!

    This article really entails two things: The history of the Universal or QWERTY keyboard layout and a comparison between BS and Membrane technology used today in keyboards, one of the most used interfaces to the computer at present.

    QWERTY keyboards are known as Universal keyboards - they are the standard by which keyboard manufacturers produce their keyboards today. It was named this due to the q,w,e,r,t,y pattern in the upper left hand corner of the keyboard. QWERTY was originally designed by Christopher Sholes to slow typing down.

    Wait a second why would we be using a keyboard layout made to slow us down? Let's look back before keyboards - typewriting. In 1868 Christopher Latham Sholes was awarded the operative patent for the typewriter. After receiving this patent, Sholes still had many 'bugs' to work out, and spent a good deal of time with the machine, working out the kinks. One of the kinks in the machine was key jamming, which was prone to happen often and could hurt the machine. If a typist typed two letters one after the other too quickly, the hammers would hit each other; the typist then had to dislodge the hammers and that could get a bit messy. So, Sholes came up with a keyboard layout that would place letters which would be most likely struck closely in succession on opposite sides of the layout.

    Eventually, due to the ability to touch type with QWERTY efficiently [first demonstrated when in a typing contest a QWERTY typist managed to type quicker than someone on a stenograph-styled machine] it became the standard.

    In 1936, August Dvorak patented his Simplified Keyboard - DSK. It was designed to balance the load of typing more evenly - those letters, which would be stricken most, would be under the strongest fingers. The credibility of the claims that the Dvorak is faster is outside the scope of this article. If one is truly interested, I recommend reading an informative article at: http://wwwpub.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/keys1.html. However I do believe that Dvorak perhaps is the better layout - although due to my experience with QWERTY I still stick with it. For those of you who think Dvorak is a legacy item no longer used, you will all be pleased to know that all windows versions greater than 3.11 are Dvorak compliant, and a simple setting can change the layout setting.

    On to the Keyboards!

    To this day I still use the IBM Model M keyboard. This keyboard was released with the original IBM PS/2 computer. It is known for it's weight, feedback, and distinctive keystroke sound. There are some Model M's which are branded by Lexmark on the back - Lexmark bought the design from IBM in the late 1980s.

    Model M's are 101 key keyboards, and still comply with all ps/2 requirements [read on for Pentium 4 possible incompatibilities and fixes.] What makes this keyboard so special?

    The first aspect that is most obvious upon actually typing is the sound and feel of the keyboard. There is a noticeable and quite prominent 'click' which is not as high pitched as some Chiconey keyboards (which are quite nice too,) the sound is not soft and mushy. The Model M's keys also have a bit of resistance to them - not so that it's hard to push them down, but just a tad bit more pressure is needed to fully depress a key. Now, for those of you up late at night, or up in the wee hours of the morning, perhaps this is a disadvantage for you. Also, many people prefer not to hear the keystroke - companies like Dell, IBM, and hundreds of others have manufactured (or sub-contracted other companies) to make quiet keyboards. Let's take a look at why these keyboards are quiet, and w

  16. Mirror by dknj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mirror here for the PS/2 modification for operation with some p4 motherboards

    -dk

  17. The M by sparkhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is quickly going to turn into a lovefest for the IBM M keyboard.

    I have several of them stashed away on the off chance that the one I've been using for the past 13 years breaks. Which it hasn't. Hoping to sell it on "Antiques Roadshow" in about 40 years.

    1. Re:The M by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

      Hey, I just realized I use a Model M. All I knew was that it is the best keyboard I've ever had. Built like a tank. Mine was built 19-May-94, "By Lexmark for IBM"

    2. Re:The M by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Interesting. My M is 11/Jul/86 and built by IBM. They eventually spun off the keyboard div into a seperate company which probably still makes keyboards of that style. Lexmark was spun off to mainly make printers, and I believe the keyboard company now has a different name.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:The M by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 1

      I have a stack of Model M/Lexmark and a stack of Model M/IBM. The Lexmark variety seem to be quieter(my wife appreciates that) and a bit lighter than the IBM variety.
      The Lexmark variety have so far not passed the dishwasher test but seem to be just as shock and damage resistant otherwise.

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
    4. Re:The M by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      I also have several of the black cables stashed away. For those of you who don't know, the black cables are the ones with oldskool 5-pin DIN connectors on the end for old AT motherboards. Yes, I still use an AT motherboard, for my ISA card EPROM burner which is only supported under DOS. (And the crazy part is that Fry's still sells 'em!)

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    5. Re:The M by runderwo · · Score: 1
      Yes, I still use an AT motherboard, for my ISA card EPROM burner which is only supported under DOS. (And the crazy part is that Fry's still sells 'em!)
      Still sells EPROM burners, or the motherboards? Just curious -- if they are selling EPROM burners, what kind?
    6. Re:The M by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Their site is http://www.pckeyboards.com. The 1993-on Model Ms are probably better, as one site said those Ms actually have drainage holes and drainage channels(!) in case you spill your coffee into it.

    7. Re:The M by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Their keyboards might be reliable, but all the links on their page were borken.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:The M by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Sorry, wrong link...
      It's http://www.pckeyboard.com (no s)

  18. You guys have it easy by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Back in my day we chiseled everything on a stone tablet

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:You guys have it easy by TyZone · · Score: 1, Funny

      Chisel? You had chisels?

      Back in *my* day, we had to scratch our messages on flat rocks with a piece of sandstone!

      Boy, you guys had it easy...

      --
      TyZone
    2. Re:You guys have it easy by mgessner · · Score: 1

      Oy... we had to use our FINGERNAILS on stone...

      --
      "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
    3. Re:You guys have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humh...In my day it was burnt stick or mud on cave wall, mud no work so good, but if you make mistake, water make mistake go away better.

    4. Re:You guys have it easy by julesh · · Score: 1

      Messages! Luxury!

      In my day, we were lucky t'have couple phonemes to string together t'make what sound' like might be one them new fangled words.

      And if you try telling that to kids nowadays, will they believe you?

    5. Re:You guys have it easy by tomzyk · · Score: 1

      Flat rocks? Sandstone? I would have given my left and right kidneys for a flat rock and piece of sandstone!

      To write messages to one-another, my whole family had to knaw on the stump of a dead fig-tree... which also happened to double as the roof of our home for all 15 of my siblings, 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 18 aunts and uncles and our dead pet parakeet named Polly.

      --
      Karma: NaN
    6. Re:You guys have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fingernails? Lucky you. we hadn't even evolved fingernails, and had to rub the stone with our gelatinous pseuodopods over thousands of generations.

    7. Re:You guys have it easy by colmore · · Score: 1

      Writing messages?

      Back in *my* day, we sang our messages in heroic epic, down through the generations. Kids today have no memory...

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  19. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I will probably get totally flamed for this but I think the best keyboards I have owned have all been made by Microsoft. Right now I am using the Office Keyboard and I love it. The action is great and the extra keys actually serve my purpose (I work in Excel and Word all day).

    1. Re:Microsoft by HeadDown · · Score: 1
      I actually hate that keyboard to death for coming up in 'office keys replace function keys and insert' by default, with no way of having it come up otherwise. I can't believe that
      • There's no toggle switch to undo this brain damage, and that
      • I shelled out good money for the keyboard.
      I want my model M back.
    2. Re:Microsoft by darthtuttle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have heard that Logitech makes Microsoft hardware which would explain it's quality. I've been using a Microsoft Natural keyboard for ages, and just love them. Now that Logitech sells them under their own name I buy them.

      What gets me is the new layout of the keys above the arrow keys, and the arrow keys. Some things shouldn't be messed with, and they are my insert and my arrow keys!

      --
      Darthtuttle
      Thought Architect
    3. Re:Microsoft by Jonsey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as you don't get the "Elite" version, I believe microsoft is still making the full-size natural (like the original one, that I still have, love, and use)

      Changes to the Elite included stupid shortcut keys, regrouping the Insert Delete Home End PU PD block, and making the arrow keys into a Diamond shape group. Ew.

      The original MS Natural Keyboard rules... /me runs home to cuddle keyboard.

      --
      I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
    4. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should read the instructions. The F Key switched back to the regular function keys. As for the insert key, I didn't even realize it was different. What do you use it for anyway? It is an office keyboard and insert is not really something anybody uses.

    5. Re:Microsoft by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

      I love my MS$ KB's as well ... except the fact that they have reconfigured the PgUp/PgDn block of keys TWICE now. I have an Elite at work (90 degrees different) and a Natural Multi. Pro at home (has a big-ass delete key and re-arranged the others). Leave it to Microsoft to use their clout to re-standardize the layout. Pisses me off when I try to hit the End key and delete a character instead.

    6. Re:Microsoft by mothrathegreat · · Score: 1
      I used to use one of those natural keyboards bu i got fed up with that stupid direction button layout. I'm now using the apple pro keyboard which (although pricey) is by far the best of all the keyboards I have ever used.

      --
      Extended Warranty? How can I lose!
    7. Re:Microsoft by gughunter · · Score: 1

      Just FYI -- shift + insert is equivalent to ctrl + V (paste) in many applications. I use it all the time.

    8. Re:Microsoft by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. There's no longer a full-size Microsoft Natural keyboard with the full layout. The last one with the full set of keys in the standard layout (well, standard besides the split keyboard) was the Natural Keyboard Pro that dropped off the list last year. The Natural Multimedia Keyboard is close - it does have an inverted-T cursor pad - but the 9 keys above the inverted-T cursor pad have been rearranged.

      Microsoft Keyboard info is available at Microsoft's keyboard site

      (and, yes, I bought a backup Natural Pro when I saw it dropped)

    9. Re:Microsoft by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      shift + insert is equivalent to ctrl + V (paste)

      and shift+del is cut
      and ctrl+ins is copy

      There are a few others that I used to use all the time in my qbasic programming days.

      My current keyboard is a Diamond Touch Keyboard. It feels nice, but probably not as nice as the older on I used to use. But it was only $AU20 new.

      The windows keys are useful, for things like show desktop (win+d), and get WinAmpControl and you'll be able to do things like win+n for next track.

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    10. Re:Microsoft by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the online activation is a real pain. And then if you swap more than 4 keys around, you have to do it all over again.

    11. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't. When it comes to hardware, logitech follows M$'s lead, and then improve from it. Keep your facts straight son.

    12. Re:Microsoft by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Microsoft keyboards typically use foam keyswitches, which are the cheapest, crapiest keyswitch technology. A buckling spring keyswitch will last you a lifetime. An IBM model M will never have to be replaced, which is great because you can get used to one keyboard - great for touch typing.

    13. Re:Microsoft by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      It is so sad, whenever I see one of those god-awful keyboards with the insert/delete/home/end/page up/page down in a 3x2 configuration I just want to throw up.
      What about the diamond arrow configuration? It makes me want to kill something.

      My body has it's own memory for the cut/paste/delete/move to the end of line/beginning of line/next word/previous word keystroke sequences learned from the old days of Borland IDEs for DOS (Pascal, TP, C++), the hands just fly whenever I need to do any of the aforementioned actions. I don't use Ctl+C, Ctl+V, it's against my nature by now.

      MS is in a conspiracy to destroy what tens of thousands of programmers have learnt over their functional lives.

    14. Re:Microsoft by Tingler · · Score: 1

      I have heard that Logitech makes Microsoft hardware which would explain it's quality.

      Not True. I worked in the hardware department at MSFT for 2 years. They design & build all their own hardware.

    15. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should have read the posting. That blasted
      keyboard start in office mode at every boot, and
      you can't change that. Yes, I know about the function key.
      And it's a MultiMedia keyboard.

  20. Microsoft keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know M$'s OS is crap, but their keyboards and mice have always been built to a very high quality.

    Expensive, but well worth the money!!!

    1. Re:Microsoft keyboards by arcanumas · · Score: 1

      Even thought MS mice and keyboards are of good quality they break just the same when you are mad (loose game, nasty bug, etc..) and then you instantly understand the superiority of a really cheap keyboard.
      This is one thing that has improved drasticaly from the old keyboards us their price. Break it and you get 2 at the price you bought the old one.

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    2. Re:Microsoft keyboards by jolyonr · · Score: 1

      I got one of those Microsoft "Natural Keyboards" back in about 1998 and I am still using it - previously I had suffered from bad RSI after long bouts of typing, but with this keyboard it actually does make it much easier to type.

      It has additional benefits - firstly the twisted layout puts people off using it, and secondly most of the letters on the bottom row of the keyboard have worn off the keys - end result - noone else touches my computer when I am away!

      Jolyon

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    3. Re:Microsoft keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are only among the best today.
      Not up to *REAL* keyboards.

  21. WIAK's First Law of Slashdotting... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Not a lot of new information, but some good visuals.

    When the eye candy is twice as nice the slashdotting is twice as fast.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  22. Model M's by hoyhoy · · Score: 1

    I worked at IBM in Rochester, MN for a time. There seemed to be a good few model M's in the recycle bins. Unfortunately, most of them were failing for one reason or another. The key sensors seem to go bad after 20 years it seems.

    1. Re:Model M's by hbackert · · Score: 1

      The key sensors seem to go bad after 20 years it seems.

      I am using an IBM keyboard (dunno M model or not, it's heavy, noisy, made in UK and build in 1987). I use it for about 10 years now and it was in regular use before. I recently bought keyboards from pckeyboard.com as they have those IBM keyboards and the ones I got from them feel exactly like my old one. Which makes me a believe, that the new ones will last at least 10 years, probably more.

      Of course it might be that they start to degrade after 20 years...still it's by far the only part of the computers I use which is not replaced for such a long time.

    2. Re:Model M's by VCAGuy · · Score: 1
      The key sensors seem to go bad after 20 years it seems.

      Notice what you said: 20 years! I've worked with lighting consoles whose control surfaces haven't lasted five. The sure don't build things like they used to.

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
    3. Re:Model M's by nevermodded5 · · Score: 1

      I also worked at IBM in Rochester, MN 1998-1999. The funny part is we all had Gateway PC's because they were cheaper than buying Aptivas at the time. So all us new guys had the crappy Gateway keyboards while the old timers had those awesome M's.

  23. Differences by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Today's keyboards aren't what they used to be, no sir!

    Indeed. Today's keyboards can be picked up for less than a fiver. Try picking one up for that price back in the "old days".

    There are plenty of good keyboards out there, but because the PC market is often dictated by price, you see more of the cheap ones than you do anything else.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Differences by $rtbl_this · · Score: 1

      Try picking one up for that price back in the "old days".

      OK, I'm confused now. Was the article about keyboards or time machines?

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
  24. Old keyboards... by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

    I still use my IBM 52G9658 M-type keyboard for everything I can--this keyboard actually helped with my wrists. I was having tender wrists (which I'm sure would be much worse if I wasn't taking regular breaks, doing the exercises, etc.), but after I started using my "new" old keyboard my pain went away and has yet to return. My doctor says that if the pain's gone, there's no need to worry any more--so I'm a very happy IBM model M user.

    --
    Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
    A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  25. Anyone Else for a New Keyboard??? by TSMABob · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I enjoy the quiet touch of my laptop's keyboard while I'm coding... its so much easier to fly across the keys without having to slam each one home... just my opinion

    1. Re:Anyone Else for a New Keyboard??? by gughunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To each his own. I prefer the buckling spring keys so much that using a "mushier" keyboard is almost distracting. Also, one benefit of the buckling spring keyboard is that the little click corresponds exactly to a keypress. If you heard/felt the click, the computer got the data; if you didn't, it didn't. With rubber dome keyboards, on the other hand, you have to keep an eye on your text at all times. Between the uncertainty and the overall mushy feel, rubber dome keyboards have at least two strikes against them in my book.

    2. Re:Anyone Else for a New Keyboard??? by blakestah · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I can't stand capacitative membrane keyboards. They are OK when new, but start to suck long and hard after a little use.

      I've been using mechanical switch keyboards (actually a Darwin Keyboards Smart Board), but I don't like the ergo layout, so I've been thinking about changing to a different mechanical switch keyboard - probably the lil big board.

  26. Heh, heh.... dented.... by Asprin · · Score: 1


    ....our keyboards had chassis's which allowed 'em to be thrown off a 3-story building and still work - barely dented.

    Back in my day, keyboards *actually* *did* *dent*, unlike the no-heft plastic chassis crud we have to deal with today. Don't get me wrong - I love my new Logitech cordless, but heft is underrated - it scoots across the table when the fan isn't turned *just* *right*.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  27. This keyboard rocks! by vgaphil · · Score: 1
    --
    A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
  28. changing views of computer parts by pytheron · · Score: 4, Interesting
    it looks like good keyboards (i.e the early ones) were more components of the computer systems, whereas cheap keyboards are peripherals of said systems.

    This only reflects the movement of the computing model, and the seperation of what is regarded as essential to what is regarded as an accessory.

    --
    "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" [William Shakespeare]
  29. QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by sparkhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article: QWERTY was originally designed by Christopher Sholes to slow typing down.

    That's simply wrong. QWERTY was designed to speed typing up by spacing out the most used keys to different sides of the keyboard.

    QWERTY was designed as he states to reduce jamming of the hammers, not to slow typists down. Even without hammers QWERTY was still faster due to the use of both hands for common letters.

    1. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by dcw3 · · Score: 1, Informative

      WRONG!...it was designed to reduce the jamming of hammers BY slowing the typists down.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Very True.

      As a matter of fact, many studies show that QWERTY, while not the *MOST* optimal, is many times more optimal than either randomly ordered keys, or linear ordering.

      Given that the punctuatuion characters are gravitated outwards, and that the Z,X and Q characters are placed on the non-dominant hand, on the edges, seems to corroborate that. If indeed you wanted to slow someone down, drop those into the middle of the keyboard!

      Now, for left-handers (often reffered to the more proper 'Spawn-of-the-devil' ) are probably at a disadvantage, but heck, what can you do ? :p

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    3. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

      What he meant was that it is meant to slow down the typing of common letter combinations. 'er' and 'ty' being pretty common...

      --
      [Please type your sig here.]
    4. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by gringer · · Score: 1

      Yes, and No. According to the follow through article, the spacing out of the keys was an unexpected (feature / side effect):

      The explanation for Norman and Rummelhart's factor C is that during a keystroke, the idle hand prepares for its next keystroke. Thus Sholes's decision to solve a mechanical problem through careful keyboard arrangement may have inadvertently satisfied a fairly important requirement for efficient typing.

      [I wonder how many other /.ers read the little novel that the condensed history linked to, especially since it needs a copy-paste.]

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    5. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by The+Subliminal+Kid · · Score: 1

      This is a missunderstanding, it is designed to slow typists down.

      The reason is simple on old pre-golf ball typewriters the heads would jam of the first key boards which were alphabetic because both the keyboard arrangements put common pairs and triplets close together and they were close together in the hammer array which means that two hammers swinging together would clash.
      This was fix in a two fold way by making the keyboard require difficult combernations and movements of the fingers and an arrangement of hammers such that common pairs of letter swung from different sides of the array.

      America was all set to change to the more comfortable and faster Dvorak system before the second world war (trails in the US Navy my college tells me) but the war sort of put a stop to that and afterwards there were too many trained typists on the QWERTY layout.

      Tunnel Carpel is a direct result of the QWERTY layout and is not experience by Dvorak users (as much).

    6. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      My bad! I think I owe the parent poster an apology...he was correct about the design of QWERTY, as a simple google search will show.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by dos_dude · · Score: 0
      I wonder how many other /.ers read the little novel that the condensed history linked to, especially since it needs a copy-paste.

      A copy-paste and a treatment with the demoronizer:
      <h2>II. SOME ECONOMICS OF S<st1:PersonName>TA</st1:PersonName&gt;NDARDS</h2>
      MS-HTML rules! Just don't try to render it.
    8. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Confused · · Score: 1

      Sorry, even if you write wrong in all caps it won't make it more true.

      In the time of mechanical typewriter (not those new-fangled IBM Selectric thingies), each key move by lever transmission a hammer from the rest position to the paper. Once the letter is stamped on the paper, the hammer moved back. The combined trajectories of all hammers describe a funnel shape ending one character wide at the paper.

      The design of the QWERTY keyboard strived to optimise the trajectories of common letters, so they move as long as possible without interference of each other and allowing this way to type the next letter before the hammer for the last letter is back in the rest position. Certain combinations were therefore fast to type, others not, giving typing text a certain distincive cadence.

    9. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by micromoog · · Score: 1
      QWERTY was designed to speed typing...

      The fact that R and T (the 3rd and 4th most commonly used letters?) are pressed with the same finger proves that this is not true.

    10. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by HSRez · · Score: 1

      If you read the linked article by Liebowitz and Margolis about QWERTY, then you should also read this article: http://www.thisistrue.com/dvorak2.html

    11. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by hjhornbeck · · Score: 1
      That's simply wrong. QWERTY was designed to speed typing up by spacing out the most used keys to different sides of the keyboard.

      That is quite untrue. There have been many studies of touch typing over the years, and they have lead to a few simple guidelines for fast typing, such as:

      • Place the most common characters on the home row, so your fingers rest on top of them for quick access.
      • Your hands should alternate heavily, so one can position itself while the other is typing.

      QWERTY does not follow either of these rules. Most keypresses are on the UPPER row, and a lot of words can be typed with only one hand (eg. minimum). Dvorak's layout ensures your hands stay on the home row, and its grouping of vowels makes it impossible to type one word with one hand only.

      There's no need to trust me, though. You could always ask the current world record holder for typing, or read up on a Discover Magazine article that goes into much more detail.

      HJ Hornbeck

    12. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      and I was going to mention the fact that A was on the outside right along with the Z,X, and Q seems to contradic his explaination as well.

    13. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But a fairly small number of words contain the sequence "rt" or "tr". Absolute frequency is irrelevent - what matters is how ofter you use them in combination.

    14. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Given that the punctuatuion characters are gravitated outwards, and that the Z,X and Q characters are placed on the non-dominant hand, on the edges, seems to corroborate that. If indeed you wanted to slow someone down, drop those into the middle of the keyboard!
      Acutally, for C programming it would probably speed things up if you had those punctuation characters closer to the middle. I wonder if there are any custom keyboard layouts for programmers...?
    15. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What he meant was that it is meant to slow down the typing of common letter combinations.

      If that's wht he meant, he's still wrong. It wasn't meant to slow anything down. QWERTY was meant to put the HAMMER BARS on the Sholes typewriter farther apart for common digraphs in order to reduce the likelyhood of jams. That's all.

      'er' and 'ty' being pretty common...

      You obviously don't know how the original Sholes typewriter worked. The 'E' and 'R' hammer bars weren't next to each other. In fact, there is another aspect of the qwerty layout that hearkens back to the Sholes typewriter, and it shows how the bars were laid out. Look at your keyboard. Notice how the rows are slightly staggered, with the 'Q' a little to the left of the 'A'? On the Sholes typewriter the letter keys were on the end of long levers and (since two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time) those levers have to be offset slightly. If you take a ruler and set it vertically next to the '1' key, then slide it to the right and note order each key crosses the edge of the ruler you get the order of the hammer bars on the original typewriter (sort of-- there was no '1' or '0' on the original). Try it. I bet you get "qa2zws3xed4crf5vtg6byh7nuj8mik9,ol0.p;". Notice how ER and TY aren't next to one another?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    16. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then why use it if your computer doesn't have any hammers?

    17. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Newander · · Score: 1

      Why use Windows? Because everyone else does.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    18. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Robb · · Score: 1

      In English 56% of the letters typed are with your left hand on a qwerty board, which would seem to indicate a left-hand bias rather than a right-hand bias.

    19. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by iabervon · · Score: 1

      It wasn't designed with speed in mind at all, just the issue with the hammers sticking. So common combinations are generally somewhat separated (remember that two keys which are adjacent horizontally are four hammers apart, because there are four rows, ignoring space and modifier keys, which don't have hammers).

      This helps to reduce vertical movement of individual fingers, and helps some with alternating hands. Of course, he didn't optimize as effectively as Dvorak, but he was mostly interested in building a functioning typewriter at the time.

      Of course, computer keyboards follow typewriter keyboards because people knew them, and they've stuck in part because programs are designed to use keys based on position (ctrl-x,c,v are next to each other; hjkl are together under different fingers, etc). So, while Dvorak is better for typing English text, it's not so good for typing it into a word processor.

    20. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by chriso11 · · Score: 1

      The 'E' and 'R' hammer bars weren't next to each other.

      But weren't the E and D next to each other, then?

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    21. Re:QWERTY -Slow typists down? Wrong. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      But weren't the E and D next to each other, then?

      Yeah, good point. I guess Sholes was a better engineer than he was a linguist.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  30. designed to slow typing down (NOT) by threeturn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I am sure I am not the only one to spot the mistake.

    The QWERTY keyboard was not designed to "slow typing down", buy rather to reduce the number of jams in a much more elegant way. It avoids having frequent adjacent letter pairs activating levers that are close to each other on the typewriters mechanism. This means that jams (which occur between adjacent levers) occur less frequently when typing FAST!

    1. Re:designed to slow typing down (NOT) by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Well, no, it wasn't designed to slow down typing. But it wasn't designed specifically in order to put the most frequently used characters under the strongest fingers.

      It's a design that's optimal for mechanical typewriters. As we no longer have the constraint of physical hammers, it is no longer necessarily the best design. So it is a partially correct statement. Not that I've ever used dvorak.

  31. I like the ergo keyboards myself by Squarewav · · Score: 1

    I used to be a tarible typist, a typical "hunt and peck" aproch to typing then I got a ms natural, and couse of how they keyboard is split, it forced me to type corectly and thus I became faster at typeing couse hunt and peck becomes more of a chore and you learn ware the keys are faster. of course now when I use a normal style kb it trips me up ;).

    yes I know my post is filled with realy bad spelling errors but i've been up all nite and too lazy to load up dictionary.com to look up words ;)

    1. Re:I like the ergo keyboards myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes I know my post is filled with realy bad spelling errors but i've been up all nite and too lazy to load up dictionary.com to look up words ;)

      Dang, and here I was going to highlight them all and tell you that "You may be a better typist, but you're still a terrible speller." :)

    2. Re:I like the ergo keyboards myself by Krypto420 · · Score: 1

      yes I know my post is filled with realy bad spelling errors but i've been up all nite and too lazy to load up dictionary.com to look up words ;)
      Or the ergo keyboard really isn't working out as well as you think ;)

    3. Re:I like the ergo keyboards myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's fine, I'll fix them for you. I'll fix some of the grammar, too.
      I used to be a terrible typist, a typical "hunt and peck" approach to typing. Then I got an MS Natural. Because of how the keyboard is split, it forced me to type correctly and thus I became faster at typing. It also helped me to learn where the keys are faster. Of course, when I use a normal keyboard now it trips me up ;).
  32. my first keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i started on a pussy-ass IBM PCjr keyboard. not the weird chicklet style one, the other one. that sucked, it is like typing on a laptop keyboard.

  33. google.com cache by geekfiend · · Score: 1

    http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:UwFu_Q0Ssx8J: www.viperlair.com/articles/techreport/input/bsmemb rane.shtml+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    There's the google cache for the upcoming slashdotting.

  34. All this talk of the best keyboards ... by Stavr0 · · Score: 1, Funny
    IBM M type blah blah. You whippersnappers had it good. My first computer was a Sinclair ZX-81, no springs, no feedback. Exactly like typing on a keyboard printed on paper and it was about 8 by 4 inches.

    I got a quasi-auditory feedback by turning on FAST mode where the TV screen would blank on each keypress and the CRT kinda hissed when it happened.

    On the whole I can type faster on a cell phone keypad than on that PoS.

    For this, I nominate the ZX-81 keyboard WORST KEYBOARD EVER.

    1. Re:All this talk of the best keyboards ... by skurk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stavr0 wrote:
      For this, I nominate the ZX-81 keyboard WORST KEYBOARD EVER.

      Funny, I just mentioned the ZX81 keyboard in a comment I just wrote under the same subject.

      And yes, I agree. In 3rd grade at school, we had an optional course called "Basic Computer Programming", where we were tought how to program on the ZX81.

      Now, when these computers were brand new, the keyboards were "fine". But since every school has its bullies, and bullies tend to use more physical force than required, these keyboards wore out after a couple of weeks. To compensate for the worn out keyboards, we had to press even harder to have our keystrokes registered...

      Oh, the sore fingertips we had..

      --
      www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
    2. Re:All this talk of the best keyboards ... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still have my Sinclair, and I agree about the keyboard. It was like little bubbles that you depressed. The "L" bubble is worn through on mine, so I can't load programs anymore! Talk about shitty...

    3. Re:All this talk of the best keyboards ... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      I nominate my Speak 'n Spell and the Atari 400 that my 5th grade class had.

      I have an M, and I like it. I am considering purchasing one without the numberic keypad so that the reach of the mouse is shorter.

    4. Re:All this talk of the best keyboards ... by jetmarc · · Score: 1

      > The "L" bubble is worn through on mine, so I can't load programs anymore!

      Hm, you should try to _r_un them instead :-)

  35. Of someone is interested.... by botzi · · Score: 1

    ... in the MMMMMMMMMMMaster of all keyboards....
    here is a short description(wiht pics;o))(cause I suppose you've never seen a kbd, have you???)!!!!).

    Surely Model M has its place in the history....

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
  36. Selectric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The "M" was IBM's attempt to bring their
    Selectric typewriter feel to the PC. It
    is better that the current keyboards; but
    more expensive. With the "M", you felt like
    you were using a tool. The feedback was
    crisp, not like the oozy feedback you get with
    modern keyboard.

  37. didn't we have this one already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't we have this one already?

    Are they now posting stuff from a year back?
    ow now somebody is looping the posts!
    they must be hacking the /. database now!
    quick call ehm.. cowboy neal!

    greetz

    Ivo

  38. Flame me if you want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But my Microsoft Natraul keyboard rocks! The multimedia keys can even be configured in linux when using gnome 2.3.

  39. The good old days by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 0

    I miss the good old keyboards when all you had to choose from was Samba, Bosa Nova, Rock and Jazz. Now these new fangled keyboards got so many buttons you can barley rock out your two-fingered Axel F./Close Encounters medley.

    --


    --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
  40. Space Cadet! by OctaneZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get your self a nice Space Cadet Keyboard. Nice action, plus you never know when you will need triangle, meta, super, or hyper!
    Actually this is something I have been trying to hunt down for a couple years, quite a nice piece of equipment.

    1. Re:Space Cadet! by starseeker · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Those pictures are originally from Mike McMahon's site at http://world.std.com/~jdostale/kbd/ They are the only images I have ever seen of a Space Cadet keyboard, which is why I created the mirror (with permission).

      I have never come close to finding one, and I'm not even sure where one would start. The one or two Lisp machine sellers I've found don't seem to have one. What I would love to see happen would be for ThinkGeek or someone to work with PcKeyboard.com or another keyboard company with the ability to make keyboards of ultimate quality, and reproduce this sucker in all it's incredibly complex detail. Even better perhaps would be a DVORAK version of the space cadet keyboard :-). I don't know what such a beast would cost, but I'm betting there are at least a few geeks out there who would put up some $$, provied it was made to the same standards as the originals.

      --
      "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
  41. The best keyboard I've had so far by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 1

    The keyboard I have now is the best feeling one I have owned, it replaced the Honeywell BS keyboard I was using from 1992. I bought it for $3 on the internet while getting some other stuff.

    Here it is, the Solidtek 270A. It's a membrane board but the membranes are really resistent at first and then give in completely. You don't have that uncertainty after you hit a key of whether or not it registered. It even has 3 extra buttons, Sleep, Wake Up, and Power, but I can't get them to work in linux. : /

    Also, I remember grade 9 typing class. 35 Model Ms all going at once, it was extremely noisy. And I'm sure the engineers at IBM would move the keycaps around to write swears and question eachother's sexuality too while they were designing it. Good times.

  42. The best keyboard I ever used... by timbck2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...was made by Wyse, attached to a Wyse 286 PC I used at work many years ago. It had neither an XT nor a PS/2 connector; instead, it attached via a modular phone (RJ-11) style connector. It had a very light touch and a nice sound. I wish I could get one for my G4.

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    1. Re:The best keyboard I ever used... by jpvlsmv · · Score: 1

      I had one of those. It used an RJ15 connector, not RJ11. RJ15 is the smaller connector that is on the telephone handset, not the phone base.

      It was electrically compatible with the standard DIN-5 (I put together an adapter to keep the keyboard on my new 386DX40)

      --Joe

    2. Re:The best keyboard I ever used... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I know the keyboard you're talking about... My 286 had one, and they were also used on some WY-2xx series dumb terminals. There were also Wyse "Winterm" devices that had a PS/2 keyboard that looks similar. Perhaps someone with experience with both Winterms and WY-2xx terminals can tell you if the keyboards are the same feel? If so, you can pick up a Winterm keyboard for ~$30.

      Those keyboards felt great but were really loud...

    3. Re:The best keyboard I ever used... by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Even if they're the same I don't think they'll work with a Mac G4.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    4. Re:The best keyboard I ever used... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Any PS-2 Windows keyboard (WITH the Windows keys) combined with a PS-2 to USB adapter can be used on a USB Mac.

  43. Northgate OmniKey 101 by yAm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am writing this with a OmniKey 101 from my first computer which has long since died. I take this keyboard from job to job and it's really funny to see the look of the "kids" that look at for the first time.

    Weighin' in at over three pounds, tactile, removable keys (not that it's ever been cleaned...) and it sounds like an M-60 in full auto when I'm furiously typing.

    I love this thing.

    By the way, does anyone know of a old-style keyboard connector to USB changer? I have a feeling that my PS/2 connector is about to out moded...

    --

    Chris

    So Buddha walks into a pizza parlor and says: "Hey, make me one with everything."

    1. Re:Northgate OmniKey 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but maybe http://www.codemercs.com can help you with their KeyWarrior. It means replacing the electronics of the keyboard completely though.

    2. Re:Northgate OmniKey 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So Buddha walks into a pizza parlor and says: "Hey, make me one with everything."

      But Buddha was a vegetarian.

    3. Re:Northgate OmniKey 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the Ctrl Key in the proper place, above the shift key, where God and the Digital Equipement Corporation (think VT100) intended it to be.

      Not to mention the function keys in two columns on the left like the original AT keyboard.

      Yes a classic.

  44. Trust Ergotrack by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

    The Trust ErgoTrack keyboard. Best keyboard I have ever used. It's split like the MS Natural but it feels a lot better.

    I've had it about 5 years- sprayed it all black.

    It's full of memories!

    (And crumbs and hair, and dust and countless other, more dubious substances).

    graspee

  45. Commodore Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Commodore AT Keyboard... When I got my new PC I got an AT to PS2 adapter so that I didn't have to use the god awful keyboard that came with it... Then one day the spacebar stopped working... I love you old Commodore keyboard! you will be missed...

  46. IBM M type and P4 fixing by hbackert · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google cache of the article how to modify an old IBM keyboard to work on a new P4 computer.

    I had no such problems though. Maybe it's because I have an Athlon...

  47. My keyboard story by dmorin · · Score: 1

    High school, circa 198x. I'm "lab monitor", and I'm out one day. I come back and a teacher very nicely explains to me that one of the keyboards fell off the counter, and that they put it all back together, only they lost the "b" key. As if this was ok?! I sat down at the machine, pulled up another keyboard, and began touching all the keys to make sure they had been put back properly. Space bar wouldn't go down. Sure enough, B key was stuck under the spacebar.

  48. Todays keyboards aren't what they used to be by 32bitwonder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My favourite keyboards were the one for the PCjr (not the chicklet one) and the one for the Atari PC1. They both had a very light, non-rubbery feel to them.

    I've just spent an exhaustive search for a replacement desktop keyboard and was absolutely dismayed by the garbage keyboards out there. What I really wanted was one that had key switches similar to my old IBM T23 laptop, the best keyboard ever IMHO. I eventually found one, and it is close, but not quite as good as the IBM.

    For those interested, you can see it at Precision Squared. Look for the PSK-5000 model. For touch typists, I highly recommend this keyboard. Mac users can find its equivalent with the MacAlly IceKey which appears to be a re-branded PSK-5000.

    1. Re:Todays keyboards aren't what they used to be by lysium · · Score: 1
      I second your motion -- the Thinkpad T23 keyboard is the best found on a laptop, if not the best keyboard, period. I'm not old enough to remember the M keyboards......

      ---------

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    2. Re:Todays keyboards aren't what they used to be by intermodal · · Score: 1

      IBM has always had the upper hand in the keyboard world...i love the one on my thinkpad 600e

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:Todays keyboards aren't what they used to be by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      Gah. Am I the only one who refuses to buy from companies with extremely crappy websites?

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    4. Re:Todays keyboards aren't what they used to be by 32bitwonder · · Score: 1

      I don't blame you. I searched high and low to find an online store to buy this keyboard from and couldn't find it anywhere but two crappy Yahoo sites, both of which refused to ship to Canada. I ended up finding & buying the keyboard (new) off of ebay.

  49. Sometimes it's just wrong by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The nicest, easiest, "just right", keyboard I've ever used was also probably one of the cheapest. Back in the 1980s, Sinclair released a "revolutionary 32 bit machine" called the QL, where every cost had been pared to the bone. It used his stringy-floppy drives (called Microdrives, no relation to IBM's tiny winchesters), an 8 bit version of the 680000 (internally 32 bit, but with a similar bus profile to the 8088, 20 bit external address bus, 8 bit external data bus, etc), and a membrane keyboard that used plastic keys pushing on a rubber sheet to provide some sort of feedback. To give some idea of how pared to the bone it was, the keyboard didn't have a delete key. The OS required you hold down CTRL and LEFT-ARROW to correct mistakes. There were five function keys and that was it.

    But, some how, the membrane keyboard was just about right. Keys had feedback, because the rubber mat was just about perfect. The keys were just where I needed them.

    Sinclair released a cheaper version for his flagship Spectrum system a little later, which had virtually no feedback and which was so poorly built that if you turned many of the machines upside down, all the keys would fall out...

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Sometimes it's just wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      680000 rofl.

    2. Re:Sometimes it's just wrong by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      I never owned a QL, but I enjoyed the "chiclet" keyboard of the Timex/Sinclair 2068 -- another keyboard that looks like it should be crap, but actually works quite well.

      This was in sharp contrast to the chiclet keyboard on the TRS-80 Color Computer, which was the worst keyboard I've ever used. (Yes, even worse than the membrane of the ZX81.) Funny, that.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  50. Microsoft Windows key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked keyboards before 3 keys were devoted to showing MS's monopoly.

  51. The era of good keyboards ended. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    When the windows key was invented.

    1. Re:The era of good keyboards ended. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, hey that must be the any key!

      i just wanna know when am i gonna get a linux key?
      a little penguin on a key would be a nice touch

    2. Re:The era of good keyboards ended. by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      hell yeah - if you had set up Alt & Ctrl as your Quake side-step keys as I had, it turned a frag-fest into a nightmare...

    3. Re:The era of good keyboards ended. by Newander · · Score: 1

      They make 'em. Can't remember where I saw it, but I did.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

  52. I had to fix my keyboard Monday by Asprin · · Score: 5, Informative


    What a coincidence -- I actually had to take my work KB (a new IBM mush-model similar to the one in the article) apart to fix it Monday because the 'p' key was getting less and less reliable, and my typing was steadily getting worse.

    When I popped the 'p' key off and looked underneath, the rubber contact mat was off center, like it had been stretched underneath so the contact didn't line up under the key. I pulled a few screws, blew out the dust and the rubber spring mat that lies on the contacts was misaligned by, like, 1/4 inch in areas. I pulled it off and tried to re-align it properly when I realized that the plastic/mylar/whatever contact sheet on the bottom wasn't flat either - like a rug that wasn't quite cut the correct shape for a room, there was a hump in it. I loosened the screws around the contacts to the PCB and I was able to then flatten the contact sheet and retighten, then realign the rubber springmat and reassemble.

    Voila! Perfect. I want to point out three things.

    1) It's still not a model M. If you find an old one GET IT, even if it's missing a few keys. Your neighbors' neighbors will hate all the clicking, but your fingers will be very, very happy. I personally have one of these as well as an original Northgate Omnikey Ultra purchased by me from Northgate Inc. in 1990 which was in use until March of this year. I replaced it because I bought a new PC and wanted a wireless KB. Every collector's shelf should have a Northgate on it, too.

    2) This new IBM has way more contacts inside than keys. I realize this is so they can produce one electronic assembly to support 15 languages, but I wonder what the other contacts would do if I hit them. Maybe I'll get bored later today.

    3) IBM's subassembly quality control has really hit the can. I realize this is a $5 keyboard, which by its design expects a certain number of defects, but if you could see how badly aligned the springmat was in this thing... SHEESH!

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
    1. Re:I had to fix my keyboard Monday by 222 · · Score: 1

      Im actually quite obsessed with my Model M's ;)
      On the 3 PC's i work with on the job, and on the 2 PC's at home, theyre all sporting good ol' clickies. I actually managed to find one IN THE BOX about 5 months ago, it was like a second X-Mas ;). Completly unstaind, it even smelled new.

    2. Re:I had to fix my keyboard Monday by ayjay29 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What a coincidence -- I actually had to take my work KB (a new IBM mush-model similar to the one in the article) aart to fix it Monday because the 'P' key was getting less and less reliable, and my tying was steadily getting worse.

      When I oed the 'P' key off and looked underneath, the rubber contact mat was off center, like it had been stretched underneath so the contact didn't line u under the key. I ulled a few screws, blew out the dust and the rubber sring mat that lies on the contacts was misaligned by, like, 1/4 inch in areas. I ulled it off and tried to re-align it roerly when I realized that the lastic/mylar/whatever contact sheet on the bottom wasn't flat either - like a rug that wasn't quite cut the correct shae for a room, there was a hum in it. I loosened the screws around the contacts to the CB and I was able to then flatten the contact sheet and retighten, then realign the rubber sringmat and reassemble.

      Voila! erfect. I want to oint out three things.

      1) It's still not a model M. If you find an old one GET IT, even if it's missing a few keys. Your neighbors' neighbors will hate all the clicking, but your fingers will be very, very hay. I ersonally have one of these as well as an original Northgate Omnikey Ultra urchased by me from Northgate Inc. in 1990 which was in use until March of this year. I relaced it because I bought a new C and wanted a wireless KB. Every collector's shelf should have a Northgate on it, too.

      2) This new IBM has way more contacts inside than keys. I realize this is so they can roduce one electronic assembly to suort 15 languages, but I wonder what the other contacts would do if I hit them. Maybe I'll get bored later today.

      3) IBM's subassembly quality control has really hit the can. I realize this is a $5 keyboard, which by its design exects a certain number of defects, but if you could see how badly aligned the sringmat was in this thing... SHEESH!

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    3. Re:I had to fix my keyboard Monday by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I prefer the cherry keyboards... espically the model 9533. It's the happy hacking keyboard that was out WAYYYY before the rcurrently overpriced model that has the wondeful feedback keys.

      It was designed for 19" rack keyboard drawers...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:I had to fix my keyboard Monday by eric6 · · Score: 1
      redundent? jesus, try reading the thing

      Voila! erfect. I want to oint out three things.


      That's funny.
      --

      --
      fight global cooling

  53. PCkeyboard.com keyboards -- so good! by willith · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've got one of the keyboards mentioned in the article--specifically, the 101-key Customizer, from www.pckeyboard.com. It weighs about five pounds, and feels like it could be used to bash in an intruder's head if necessary. Plus, it doesn't have Windows keys, which is a boon when I'm gaming--no more accidentally dumping me out to the desktop during heated Battlefield 1942 matches!

    It's buckling-spring and loud as hell, though it doesn't sound quite the same as a Model M. Still key response is crisp and exactly matches what I want out of a keyboard. It is easily the best computer-related purchase I have ever made. After all, what part of your computer do you physically interact with every time you sit down?

    1. Re:PCkeyboard.com keyboards -- so good! by MoreDruid · · Score: 1
      After all, what part of your computer do you physically interact with every time you sit down?
      Well, not every time I sit down, but very often indeed...

      Oh... computer part? ehrm... nevermind

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    2. Re:PCkeyboard.com keyboards -- so good! by jeddak · · Score: 1

      You sit on your keyboard?????!!!!!!

    3. Re:PCkeyboard.com keyboards -- so good! by HFXPro · · Score: 1

      You do know you can disable the windows key or even remap it to other keys?

      --
      Reserved Word.
    4. Re:PCkeyboard.com keyboards -- so good! by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      I remember artists disabling the windows key - by ripping it out. This was because it hard crashed 3d studio 4 (before max). After they missed ctrl or alt and lost a few hours work, they soon learned to "fix" the keyboard.

  54. The One True Keyboard by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A few weeks ago I killed my Ortek keyboard. It wasn't a great keyboard; it had the "silent" mushy-keys and plenty of useless "internet" and "media" chiclet buttons. The Enter key broke and I'd fastend it with a small screw (which surprisingly didn't interfere with typing). It died in the most cliched way possible: direct coffee spillage.

    The same day I drove down to Office Max to get an emergency keyboard. Everything was pretty much worthless, even compared to my old keyboard. I finally settled on a Logitech media keyboard solely on the feel of it.

    I used it for about a day, then heard someone commenting on IBM Model M and Northgate keyboards. I remembered the little worthless 486 test server I had sitting in my closet, and remembered the keyboard attached to it was a Northgate. I walked over and pressed the keys...click click. Smiled, grabbed AT-to-PS/2 adapter, and replaced the new Logitech.

    I'll never go back. In fact, I surprised I used anything else, because that old keyboard used to be my main keyboard back in the day. When it dies, I'll get an Avant Stellar, which is a remake of the original Northgate using the original design documents and manufacturing processes.

    Every key has a perfectly balanced snap action. It provides just the right amount of force before the key clicks in, and once you hear the click you know the key has been pressed. It might sound like someone with a clicky keyboard is really pounding on it, but ideally it allows you to flit over the keyboard without having to mash every key down to the bottom to ensure it was pressed. You learn to hear each keypress, and can often catch an accidental extra letter by ear.

    And now you know why all the old laptops had a "key-click" noisemaking feature, sometimes in the BIOS.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:The One True Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank you SO MUCH for the link to Avant Stellar. I have a Northgate Omni I've been using for years and always wondered if I'd ever be able to get a replacement. And I like the function keys down the left too, glad they make a version like that. My Omni started to die at one time, a few of the keys were not making contact or sticking or other issues but after awhile the problems went away... and it keeps on going! Thanks again!

    2. Re:The One True Keyboard by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      By the way I'm typing this on a Compaq keyboard, which explains the typos. ;-)

      Compaq keyboards are somewhat better than the average breed of new-generation keyboards, though.

      --
      ...
    3. Re:The One True Keyboard by jafuser · · Score: 1

      I've been looking to get a programmable keyboard, and from what I can tell this looks like a good one. I just have a couple of questions.

      How does the programmable part of it work? Do I hit a key telling it to record, then type what I want, then press a key again to stop recording then press which key to save the recording to?

      Does it record the delay between keypresses as well, so that those delays are incorporated at playback?

      Which/how many keys can be programmed?

      Does it depend on the OS's keyboard driver to perform the macro, or does the keyboard itself send the series of steps in the macro as if you had typed them?

      Does it do laundry?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    4. Re:The One True Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a macro mode in the keyboard itself. There is also (windows based) software which can upload macros to the keyboard. I believe it plays them back at the keyboards repeat rate (very fast). Generally it is more useful to remap keys (i.e. put caps lock where its supposed to be, above shift). The keyboard even comes with a spare CAPSLOCK and CTRL key so you can swap them around, (they are different sizes) and a key puller so you can rearrange the entire keyboard layout (for example if you want to make the keyboard dvorak).

    5. Re:The One True Keyboard by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      The key features to me on these boards are:

      Full L Enter Key
      Full Backspace
      Backslash/pipe were it should be! :)

      It amazes me how few keyboards there are nowadays with this key pattern.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
  55. USB Buckling Springs??? by babymac · · Score: 1

    If you read Slashdot are you a geek? No, but if you obsess over various types of keyboards you'll be branded a geek faster than you can say "buckling spring."

    I fell in love with BS keyboards (IBM model M) back in college. I've been looking for one for myself ever since. Here's the dilemma: My primary computer is a Mac. Most of the Model Ms I've seen use a funky type of RJ45-like connector. Does anyone know of a manufacturer that:

    1. Makes USB buckling spring keyboards?
    2. Supports their use on the Mac OS?

    Many thanks...CTP

    --
    "War makes me sad." - Me
    1. Re:USB Buckling Springs??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Follow the links to PC Keyboard for their newfangled USB/Windows Key models. The Windows key works as the Command key under MacOS.

  56. Kinesis keyboard by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just thought people might find this interesting:

    A year ago, I got myself a Kinesis Contoured keyboard. It took me two weeks and a couple of hours of TuxTyping to get used to it, but since then it's great. I've never had any real RSI, but the Kinesis makes you sit more comfortable. You sit with straight arms; horizontally as well as in a straight angle.

    It's quite expensive, though. :-/

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Kinesis keyboard by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      While RSI does exist and natural keyboards help, many people would reduce the chances of having pains in their hands and joints by drinking less coffee, caffeine etc..

      The body needs water and beverages with caffeine cause dehydration.

      Link to information about dehydration

  57. They are still readily available on ebay by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, they were generally selling for $15-20 last time I checked, but I'd rather pay that for a good keyboard than buy a [new] $6.99 piece of crap.

    I'm down to one now, though -- stepped on one (don't ask), the cat dumped a glass of beer in another one (again, don't ask, please...).

    1. Re:They are still readily available on ebay by zaxus · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I have to ask... :-)

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
  58. Slashdotting? by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Today's websites aren't what they used to be, no sir! Back in my day, we had our caching technology; our wesites had redundency which allowed 'em to be slashdotted and still work - barely dented. Yes those were the days."

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
    1. Re:Slashdotting? by PetWolverine · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like the comparison of the /. effect to being thrown from 3 stories up onto concrete. Very appropriate.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    2. Re:Slashdotting? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Those are the days when slashdot only had 10,000 total users right.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  59. holy off topic, batman by ldspartan · · Score: 1

    What consoles were/are these? I've worked with some really old consoles before, and they've all still been operating correctly. (Including an old Kliegl [Performer? I think thats it] that used tape storage and had an embedded monitor).

    --
    lds

    1. Re:holy off topic, batman by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      They were three different ETC Impression 2 consoles (firmware versions 1.6 to 1.8). All of them either had failed cue faders or submasters. The current Expression 3s haven't developed this issue.

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
    2. Re:holy off topic, batman by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      What kind of use did they see? I can understand that kind of failure rate touring, or in a education setting (maybe).

    3. Re:holy off topic, batman by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      Let's see...one was, indeed, used in touring (half the board crapped out during a rehearsal, much to the surprise of the LD). The other was in a small community theater, and the last one, most surprisingly, was in a church. It was surprising to me becuase only two techs ever touched it, it was covered when not in use and generally taken good care of--yet, the mixer sitting next to it (Yamaha PM4000, I think) is still ticking along fine. Now, I don't ask for much in the way of reliability--but I don't think it's too much to ask for a light board that outlives the mixer sitting next to it!

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  60. Chassis's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point of a keyboard if you can't spell, for heaven's sake? It's "chassis", singular or plural. Got it? Cripes!

  61. Model M competition by Phishpin · · Score: 1

    I was introduced into the wonderful Model M about a year and a half ago when I picked two up a flea market for $5 along with some old mice.

    I'd been using both Model Ms on my main and secondary machines at home. But a few months ago I got a mini-keyboard made by BTC. Its like the Happy Hacking keyboard. Its got great tactile feedback, similar to the M but without the same sound. The added desk space is nice too.

    --
    -phish
  62. In case of slashdotting: by byrd77 · · Score: 0

    QWERTYUIOP[]\
    ASDFGHJKL;'
    ZXCVBNM,./

    It's not that funny, but the lameness filter still sucks... la la la la la

    --
    - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
  63. Good Visuals? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    No, they don't make them like they used to :)

  64. BS technology by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Until he finally explained on page 2 that BS technology is an abreviation for Buckling Spring technology, I was reading Bullshit technology every time.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  65. The other article... by TrekkieGod · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I got this link from the article, where it's mentioned that ergonomic keyboards aren't all they're cracked out to be...and it's a hilarious piece of work.

    To the lazy people, lemme reproduce the link:

    What I find funny, besides the comment that what causes limb disorders is the stress of deadlines and not the keyboard (citing gamers who supposedly don't have any problems, hah!), is the author's choice of pictures. I guess I can understand lara croft, but what's with the cat? And look at the caption on that picture...I don't know, I have a weird sense of humor, maybe it's just funny to me.

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    1. Re:The other article... by yoha · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that the story is ridiculous. Paraphrase: The benefits of an ergo keyboard are offset by the stress of learning how to use it. HAH!

    2. Re:The other article... by ramk13 · · Score: 1

      (from parent's link)
      "As evidence for this, Professor Buckle says keen computer game players pound on keyboards and joysticks for hours on end, but seem to suffer few injuries as a result. Only when someone else is cracking the whip do workers start to be at risk."

      A reason isn't right just because it seems like it fits. Some numbers on gamers with RSIs and workers with RSIs and the relative hours that they spend at the keyboard would say something. I suspect that a lot of gamers don't actually spend 35-40 hours a week in front of a computer like some workers do. Or is there a possibility that some people work and game?? I suppose it might to hard for a BBC article to get into the details of the matter, but leaving the reader with the idea that working in front of a keyboard is worse than gaming in front of a keybaord without some evidence is no good. A professor making an unqualified statement, is still making an _unqualified statement._

    3. Re:The other article... by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      I suspect that a lot of gamers don't actually spend 35-40 hours a week in front of a computer like some workers do.

      That's part of the problem, gamers don't all spend the same amount of time playing. While some play more, others play less, and it is unfair to include those that play less in that area. Another problem is the assumption that they don't have problems, I honestly don't know where they got that from. I am a gamer, and with new games I've been known to spend that much time playing, but I am suffering from problems. I had to switch the hand with which I press the space bar because it was painful. Then I switched to dvorak, and that helped also.

      I know another gamer, definitely a lot more hardcore than I used to be, and he easily plays more than that. He has had problems too, and swears by the benefits of a wrist pad.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    4. Re:The other article... by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

      Not to even mention the problem with the first picture. The problem that person is having is that they haven't put their hands in the proper position for typing. Am I the only one who actually took a typing class and learned that you are not supposed to rest your hands on the keyboard, that you should have slightly convexly curved fingers such that you are pressing straight down on the key, rather than off to the side, etc.? This article is BS.

  66. Apple used to make the best keyboards... by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    before they got all artsy-fartsy. Now the keyboard is the first thing I toss when I buy a new Mac.

    I loved how the caps lock actually locked down at half-height on the old Apple Pro Keyboard, so you could tell by touch if the caps lock was on.

    1. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by krisp · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, the apple keyboards are great. What do you replace it with? An old apple keyboard with out F-keys? You can't replace it with a PC keyboard unless its usb, and even then you still lose a few keys.

      The black (recent) apple keyboard may be fancy looking but it is soft to the touch and quite useable.

    2. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, the apple keyboards are great. What do you replace it with? An old apple keyboard with out F-keys? You can't replace it with a PC keyboard unless its usb, and even then you still lose a few keys.

      I replace it with this Macally keyboard, which is modeled after the old Apple keyboards, though not quite as well designed.

      The new Apple keyboards are too small. And I HATE half-sized keys! It's definitely form over function.

    3. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I rip the caps-lock key off my keyboards as soon as I get them out of the box.. it annoys me greatly and I never use it.

    4. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by li99sh79 · · Score: 1

      The Apple Design II, i believe that was the one, was one of the best keyboards i've ever used. It was the last ADB keyboard they made, and it was a nice full-zised keyboard with the righ amount of "clack" to it. Although admittedly my fondness for it could be based on the fact that it was pretty much a knock-off of the standard PS/2 hundred some key keyboard. The original iMac keyboard was ok, not great, but not awful, a little too spongy for my taste. They were sort of a throwback to the old Apple designs that were also pretty small. I really haven't had a chance to play with any of the new Apple Pro keyboards so I can't comment on 'em, once I get my G5 i'll let everyone know :).

      -sam
      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    5. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of Apple's keyboards are pure evil. The ones that came with the G4s around 3 years ago are part of this.

      I could go into a whole rant about how the tiny cursor keys are annoying, or about how some keys are flat out missing, and so on, but I won't. This is because I have a better thing to complain about with regards to that keyboard.

      The damned thing had a serious problem with certain key combinations. The way I type tends to generate them a lot, and it only created a problem on that one keyboard. Every other keyboard I could find would take my input just fine. It was just my stupid Mac keyboard that regularly flipped the letters around.

      It wasn't the Mac OS, since Linux on there did the same thing. It also wasn't that box, since the same keyboard did (and still does) the same crap on other systems.

      I finally "solved" it by putting it on a shelf and buying another USB keyboard. I believe the problem is something to do with 'rollover', but haven't bothered to figure out exactly what happened. It's not like I can reprogram the keyboard to fix it.

      By the way, I use one of the revered IBM PS/2 model Ms for real work. How else can you get the *clicky clicky* when it comes time to delete someone?

    6. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

      Okay, it's not just me. I remember loving the Apple Pro keyboard and at least liking the keyboard before the current iteration, but the haptic quality of Apple's current keyboards is terrible. Ironically, the "low travel" keyboard on the PowerBook is much better than the desktop keyboards.

      I noticed Zathrus' link below to PCKeyboard.com, which would almost be what I'm looking for--I want to find a keyboard with that "Selectric" feel that's USB-based, so it can work with the Mac. Failing that, are there any good recommendations you (or aynone else) have for third-party Apple keyboards with good tactile quality?

    7. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      Macally makes a keyboard that seems to be a direct copy of the Apple Keyboard II (or whatever they called the consumer version).

      Granted, it's not the old Apple Pro Keyboard, but it's still way, way better than any USB keyboard Apple has ever produced.

    8. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by tuffy · · Score: 1
      I rip the caps-lock key off my keyboards as soon as I get them out of the box.. it annoys me greatly and I never use it.

      I just re-map the caps lock to another control key. That way my fingers always find it in the right spot and I never have to worry about any stupid ALL CAPS mode.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    9. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by Uart · · Score: 1

      I've gotten completely addicted to the keyboard on my Powerbook G4, its the greatest typing experience of all time...

      I find it kind of hard to switch to another brand of keyboard anymore.

      Before switching to Macs I used to prefer this keyboard

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    10. Re:Apple used to make the best keyboards... by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      This all works fine until you try to play a game or something that doesn't talk to the same keymapping you think it should. I've tried (under old MacOS).. maybe I should again, mebbie not. Ripping the key off works too :)

  67. /.'d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor site has been /.'d for awhile now.

  68. How old is he again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some Model M's which are branded by Lexmark on the back - Lexmark bought the design from IBM in the late 1980s.

    As any oldskooler would tell you, Lexmark is a spin-off of IBM, back in the 90's.

  69. ModelM by gregRowe · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently bought a Model-M for work. It's brand new (but was built in 1999, as can be seen from the sticker on the back).

    www.pckeyboard.com sells them. If they are out of IBM model-Ms you can buy buckling spring keyboards made by unicomp. For an extra 5$ you can get "cap and stem" which is removable keycaps.

    When I bought from unicomp it was a pleasure. They keyboard arrived very quickly.

    --
    There\'s no place like ~
  70. Apple Extended Keyboard II by mccalli · · Score: 3, Informative
    Still the best I've ever used. Cost me £124 in about 1992/93, and worth every penny. That last point is relevant - so many people take a keyboard for granted that they're unwilling to spend extra on better quality. Thus they end up sticking with whatever rubbish arrived with their machine (don't they, IBM Netstation customers...?)

    I've used many keyboards since of course, and whilst I seem to have settled on Microsoft keyboards these days I still haven't found anything nicer than the ancient Apple. Co-incidently (or not, as the case may be...) the keyboard on the 12" Powerbook is also extremely nice.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II by chaoticset · · Score: 1
      Every time I have to go shopping for a new keyboard, I make sure I put my hands on it for a few minutes and close my eyes.

      I do not care about extra keys, CD/Email/Connect/whatever else. (I'll admit that volume controls are occasionally handy, though.) I'm just testing the responsive clicks, how it sounds and feels. This thing is my input tool for probably 90% of the communications I care about in a day -- you'd better believe I want it to be easy on my hands, distinctive to my ears, and have a nice sharp snap back with each key.

      The day I find a keyboard that somehow sounds exactly like an old mechanical typewriter, though, is the day that I fall in love with a brand and never stray. :)

      --

      -----------------------
      You are what you think.
    2. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Co-incidently (or not, as the case may be...) the keyboard on the 12" Powerbook is also extremely nice.


      You've got that right. It's the nicest keyboard I've used since the old Tandy Model 100.
    3. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      (chuckle) I learned to type on mechanical typewriters... the side-effect was that when I took a computer course the follow year (TRS-80 Model IIIs) - the computer teacher complained that I was too "heavy" on the keyboard.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I've been fortunate enough to pick a few up at yard sales as backups - they're often in great condition as they're well built and lightly used by the home user.

      I've been using mine every day several hours a day for at least ten years, and I've only had to replace one. I've been using the Griffin iMate to connect them to USB computers since ADB went away.

      Does anybody know what actually makes these keyboards so great? I'm always on the lookout for a replacement, but so far no dice.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Amen. My 1999 HP Multimedia KB (PN 5183-7399) has Internet, Search, Help, Standby, Volume, and Mute buttons. The first three buttons don't work (I didn't install the HP recovery CD, because I wanted Windows 2000, and the CD doesn't get along with W2K very well), I don't use standby, but I nearly have to use volume/mute, as my speakers are the crappy Polk Audio speakers that come with HPs made in 1999 or later. You know, the ones that are like headphones internally, and are powered by the sound card(!) Volume is controlled through the SC too, so it's volume buttons or clicking on the speaker icon and dragging it up.

    6. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II by 32bitwonder · · Score: 1

      Yes! These are excellent keyboards. I've often wondered if there were PC conversion kits available for this keyboard - doubt it. I have a few of them, all of which I cannot use on my PC.

      What I like about these keyboards as compared to the IBM Model M is their quiet nature. The IBM's are amazing keyboards, but a little too loud for my liking.

    7. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      www.weirdstuff.com:

      New Apple AEKII $24.95
      New Sun Type 6 $29.95

      I don't mind slashdotting them now since I alreday have mine :-)

  71. All my input... by WeeLad · · Score: 2, Funny
    ..is voice rekonishun u insensssitive klod!!!

    --
    Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
  72. They still make them by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    IBM spun off the keyboard div into a seperate company. AFAIK they still make them with that lovely clack.

    I don't remember the name of the company, I wasn't very interested because, you see, I've already got one. :^P

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:They still make them by starfish23 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it's Lexmark that purchased the M design.

    2. Re:They still make them by shamino0 · · Score: 1
      IIRC, it's Lexmark that purchased the M design.

      Lexmark was spun off from IBM. They're the group that made the peripherals (keyboards, mice, printers, etc.) Today, I think they only make printers.

      Several people from the keyboard group left Lexmark and bought the patent for buckling-spring keys and started their own company. PCKeyboard.com is that company. They can sell you a classic type-M keyboard. They can also sell you a new keyboard (with Windows keys if you like) using buckling-spring technology.

      Unfortunately, they don't make any with a USB interface. I'd really love to get one of these for my Mac.

    3. Re:They still make them by starfish23 · · Score: 1

      Amen to the USB thing! I would be happier than a pig in s**t if I could get a modern type-M with a USB interface.

  73. If you want a good keyboard by Gherald · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out the Logitech Elite there at the top. Best keyboard made.

    Alternatively, if you just need something simple for office use, or to purchase in volume, the Mitsumi KFK-EA4XT is a solid no-frills keyboard. I use it on all my secondary systems.

  74. Condensed? by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Funny

    DoesThatMeanTheyHadABrokenSpaceBar? :)

  75. Where to buy one by Sam+Lowry · · Score: 1

    PCkeyboard sells old-styled IBM keyboards in different mods. I personnally like the black one without any marking and a red trackpoint in the middle

  76. IBM keyboards still for sale by MavEtJu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have a look at http://www.pckeyboard.com/.

    Asked them one time how much it costs to get one shipped to .au but euh... I wasn't happy with the price. I've asked them again, maybe the price has dropped a little bit.

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  77. Price and innovation by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The author notes how durable keyboards used to be and easier to clean. But back then keyboards were designed to a different standard. The were desinged to last and sometimes to be repaired. Modern computer accessories are almost designed to be disposable. That extends to the computer and electronics nowadays. I mean when was the last time anyone actually took a TV to be repaired. More often if a TV or radio breaks, people just buy a new one. Computer are to the point where most people simply replace their old ones instead of upgrading. Ordinary mice and keyboards are in

    Although he doesn't mention it, but how much did they cost back then? Adjusting for inflation, they probably cost more than new ones cost today. One thing it interesting to note that most of the functionality hasn't changed. Sure newer keyboards are wireless and have additional buttons, but older ones work just as well.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Price and innovation by Confused · · Score: 1

      Yes, the keyboard production process has constantly been improved. Very few of those improvements went into better quality or comfort, most went to save costs.

      Even without adjusting for inflation, I doubt it was possible in the 80's to get cheap keyboards at todays prices.

    2. Re:Price and innovation by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Indeed, they cost a LOT more back then. So much so, that low-end home computers often used weird designs like membranes and chiclets to keep the cost down, lest the whole system cost twice as much.

      But the cool thing is that those sturdy old IBM keyboards still work, and you can NOW get them -- used -- for the same price as you'd pay for a new mushy keyboard. Plus, the Model M will probably keep on working past the point where you'd have to replace that new mushy keyboard.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Price and innovation by fieldmethods · · Score: 1

      I actually have an IBM M keyboard, sitting right here.

      But good god, where do you STICK that thing on the end of the cable? It's got some kind of insane 5-pin plug in it that looks like it's intended for high voltage.

      Okay, wait, now that I look at it, it's not an M. But it *is* clicky. Are there adapters for such things?

  78. Design by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 1, Funny
    This is my favorite keyboard layout:

    |0| |1|
    Unfortunately, it went out of market in the 50's.
  79. IBM 101 by Rementis · · Score: 1

    Back in 1996 I found a classic 101 still in the box in my company's junk room. I recognized it from my old army days and snatched it up. I'm still using it today and it's still in perfect condition. If you can find one, buy it.

  80. clatter by freedommatters · · Score: 1

    my wife still types as if she is using the old-fashioned typewriter she learnt to type on. she is so loud i have to ask her to stop typing if i want to use the phone, god help the people in her office.

  81. Useless keys by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Newer keyboards have all these keys that I don't use but I don't mind them too much as they are optional from manufacturers. The one useless key that I hate is that damn Windows key. It always gets in my way when I use CTRL and ALT. As far as I can tell it's completely useless for most everyday functions. Incidently, I've noticed it's in the exact position as the Apple key on Apple keyboards. But on the Apple it is better spaced to avoid conusion and it is used for shortcuts.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Useless keys by dasunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Er, what do you mean the Window key is useless? There are several shortcuts associated with it (a Short List), and its useful to map to other apps as well. For example, Win+Z|X|C|V|B is set up on my MS Windows machine to control winamp, regardless of whatever app is focused at the time.

      Its possible to use the windows key in a similiar fashion under XFree86, hotkeying combos to certain actions.

    2. Re:Useless keys by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

      How do you assign custom functions to WindowsKey-Letter combinations? Is that a WinAmp feature or a standard Windows function?

    3. Re:Useless keys by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Higher up in the thread was information on how to disable the Windows key under MS-Windows.

      I always disable my Windows key.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:Useless keys by dasunt · · Score: 1

      To assign Window hotkey functions to winamp, I use a free winamp plugin called Flexplug. Its a free (beer) stripped down version of their Flextouch software, and has no ads or spyware that I am aware of. Works well for me.

      A quick google search also turns up hotplug [seems open source], hotkey RC, and Winamp KeyController 4.0 [freeware]. Winamp KeyController seems to be the most popular one in my brief search.

      By now, xmms users are probably feeling left out, so here are a few links for them: xmms-shell which allows us to control xmms from the command line, gkrellmms[1] a plugin to control xmms from gkrellm, and xvfb [no link available], which allows us to use xmms without it cluttering the main x session [all exist as packages in debian-stable: xmms-shell, gkrellmms, and xvfb]. I tend to use screen within rxvt alot, so I do a quick 'xvfb-run xmms &>/dev/null &' and use gkrellmms to supervise what's playing. Then I have aliases (actually shell scripts) named mp3[z|x|c|v|b] which use 'xmms-shell -e <command>" to go back, play, pause, stop, or go forward. mp3i is another shell script that runs the following command: 'xmms-shell -e status | head -n 1 | sed "s/Playing:\ //g" | sed s/channels/ch/g' [displays song name and a bit of information]. That way, in a majority of the programs I can quickly use a shell escape and control the song (no, I'm not really fond of the mouse).

      It might seem like a bit of work, but I tend to play a lot of music on my computer - why not make it easy to use?

      [1] For those of you who don't use gkrellm, there is wmusic [apt-get install wmusic] and wmxmms.

  82. tell it, brother! by mikeee · · Score: 1

    Same story here.

    If you can't beat a luser senseless with it, it's not a keyboard, that's what I say.

  83. I look forward to the day ... by JSkills · · Score: 4, Funny
    I look forward to the day when there are no need for keyboards. What a ridiculous way to communicate for people who can speak and think.

    Don't get me wrong - I code for a living, so I can certainly appreciate the value of the keyboard as a user interface peripheral. A good friend of mine who had RSI in his wrists really bad switched to using Dragon speech recognition software exclusively. Listening to him attempt to code (in Perl) was pretty funny, e.g. saying "twiddle" for "~" and such.

    Mod me down for being off topic, but I cannot resist mentioning the Star Trek (#4 - with the whales) movie where Scottie attempts to use the computer from the past by talking to it.

    "Computer, please calculate the mass of ..."
    "No Scottie, you have to use this" (pointing to the mouse).
    "Oh, okay". He picks up the mouse like it is a policeman's radio and begins to speak into it "Computer, please calculate the mass of ... ".

    It just goes to show how far off we are in terms of a truely intuitive user interface.

    1. Re:I look forward to the day ... by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

      Good reference but (revealing my inner geek here), didn't Scotty give up on verbal commands and start typing like a madman?

      That always killed me - why on earth would he be a fast typist? And how could he possibly know the correct syntax for what would be an arcane computer to him? It's like walking into the Smithsonian, firing up ENIAC and immediately programming it to play War Games.

      Guess the producers assumed that "good with computers" means "good with all computers".

    2. Re:I look forward to the day ... by JSkills · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right - once Scotty realized he couldn't use the mouse like a microphone, he looked at the keyboard and said "How quaint" and then started going at it at a rate of 60 words per minute. And yes, how the hell would he know what to do with an old fashioned keyboard from centuries ago?

    3. Re:I look forward to the day ... by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

      I also like the way he designs something graphically by typing. You see that one a lot.

      But he can do all this, see, because he's an ADVANCED being from THE FUTURE (echo...). They know EVERYTHING.

    4. Re:I look forward to the day ... by dstone · · Score: 1

      It just goes to show how far off we are in terms of a truely intuitive user interface.

      Interfaces do not need to be intuitive, do they? A.I. definitely has a goal of intuitive machine-human interaction, but interface design (depending on the application) also needs to think about efficiency, robustness, etc. For expert users or even frequent users, an unintuitive (to the outsider) but very efficient, reliable, reproducable interface might be the best idea. Keyboard? Steering wheel? (Think about it.) Foot pedals? These are all unintuitive controls that we invented to control our strange inventions and machines. And they actually work very well for all but the most untrained users. Humans are excellent at learning and adapting. Machines are not. What are your interface goals?

    5. Re:I look forward to the day ... by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
      "Listening to him attempt to code (in Perl) was pretty funny, e.g. saying "twiddle" for "~" and such."

      It's a tilde, dammit! Sound like a bunch four year olds saying "twiddle". Any coding would be like this... "Left-angle h-t-m-l right-angle enter left-angle exclamation-point dash dash ..." or "right-parenthesis right-parenthesis right-parenthesis right-parenthesis..."

    6. Re:I look forward to the day ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They know EVERYTHING."

      except what a mouse looked like and how it was supposed to be used.

    7. Re:I look forward to the day ... by JSkills · · Score: 1
      Tilde is the correct word, but when you "train" Dragon speech, you can call it what you like.

      BTW - you're coding example doesn't sound much like actual code, more like creating HTML tags. Writing HTML is not coding.

  84. Buy your BS keyboard by leoboiko · · Score: 1

    Here.

    My university has a few Model M's around. My teacher won't trade, sell or give any of them to me though :(

    --
    Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    1. Re:Buy your BS keyboard by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      *ahem* 50$? youve got to be kidding me. i cant imagine they sell that many of them.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  85. One issue about the ol' IBM keyboards... by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    Is that they suck for FPS-ish gaming where you want more sensitivity...my UT performance went up considerably when my much-loved IBM PS/2 keyboard met an unfortuant death at the hands of a can of coke.

    And though it may only be me, my hands used to get tired and sore after long bouts of typing with them.

  86. Indeed they were sturdier, but... by Saiai+Hakutyoutani · · Score: 1

    ...Some people actually PREFER keyboards that respond to your fingers, rather than keyboards that you have to jump on in order to (maybe) punch in a key.

    I do have some old keyboards lying around, and I use them for spare parts whenever one of my newer keyboards decide to call it a day. However, I prefer the new ones for their unique useability and feel.

  87. Multiple keys at the same time by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 1

    Is it only me that remembers when you could get key reads for multiple keys?
    Test case: Playing doubles on Mortal Kombat on PC, with two people on the keyboard. After 3/4 keypresses of at the same time, the rest is ignored. This didn't use to happen on the older keyboards. This did create some interesting tactics for the game tho =)

  88. Wooden keyboard by stankyho · · Score: 1

    Why not go way oldschool and build yourself and original keyboard.

    Gotta scroll down to see it.

    --

    ---
    eeww, I'll have a crab juice.
  89. Want an IBM Model M? by mblase · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently you can find them for sale, albeit in limited quantities, here (as well as on eBay, natch).

    There's a site all about the thing at www.modelm.org, but I can't get to the server right now, so here's a Google cache instead.

  90. There used to be ... by torpor · · Score: 1

    ... a fairly decent diatribe on why SHIFT keys are bad, bad, bad, but I can't remember enough words to find it with google.

    Anyone know of a good designers style diatribe against the idea of SHIFT and modal interfaces and such? I think "Design of Everyday Things" had a chapter on it, but I for sure remember reading something, while researching keyboard designs, which really struck home on why SHIFT/ALT/CTRL/WIN/CMD/APPLE keys have been terrible concepts to inflict on the computer user...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  91. PCKeyboard.com by jkujawa · · Score: 4, Informative
    You can buy both reconditioned original IBM Model Ms at PCKeyboard.com, or the Customizer, which PCKeyboard is actually manufacturing.


    Quality, Durable and Flexible These words best describe Unicomp's Customizer keyboard. Based on an award winning design, the Customizer combines the same quality and crisp tactile feedback as its IBM and Lexmark predecessors. The Pearl White Customizer (shown here) is available in either enhanced quiet touch (EQT) or buckling spring (BS) technology The enhanced quiet touch style is great for noise sensitive environments, and the buckling spring model offers a touch that is unparalleled. Once you've experienced the touch of this keyboard, you'll be sold.


    They have it in black now, too. Unfortunately, they still don't have a USB version.
    1. Re:PCKeyboard.com by neves · · Score: 1

      Have anyone here tried the silent models? I've just bought three 10 years old Model M keyboards, but my wife hates the sound late at night.

    2. Re:PCKeyboard.com by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      After using my old Toshiba laptop, I've got my eyes on their EnduraPro/104. It's got Windows keys, but I use those, and it's got a TrackPoint. It's $100, so not too bad, and it's a BS (THANK GOD!) Of course, a Model M would be SOOOO much cheaper, and probably works better too.

    3. Re:PCKeyboard.com by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      Yes i have their silent 101 key keyboard.

      I like the key layout. There' no Windows keys to accidentally hit when I'm going for the ctrl or the alt key, and the backslash is up where it belongs, above the rectangular enter key.

      And while it's not buckling spring, I would dispute their "quite" claim. It is quite loud to use. The best way I can describe the sound it makes is like a RATTLE. The keys all wiggle a bit from side to side, and if you pick up the keyboard and shake it around like an etch-a-sketch it'll sound like shaking a rattle. For this reason the keys to make a bit of noise when typing, unless you make an effort to hit the keys very softly, which i don't.

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  92. Nothing like the Model 026 keypunch by klubar · · Score: 1

    Haven't seen one for years, but I still remember the good solid thunk of the model 026 keypunch machine. With the tactile and audible feedback the machine gave you really knew something was happening. Is anyone still making keypunch machines?

  93. IBM PS/2 keyboard? Pshaw..try these... by wandazulu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though they only worked with terminals, the *real* manly keyboard in a world of manly keyboards was the IBM 3270/5250 terminal keyboard. Twenty-four function keys across the top, ten special purpose function keys on the left side, arrow keys actually laid out in a diamond shape instead of the common upside-down T, a numeric keypad, and a keyboard cable so thick it could be used to support bridges.

    Add to the fact that it had a metal casing similar to the original IBM keyboard whereas the later model keyboards, and all the PS/2 keyboards are plastic. Tough plastic to be sure, but I still was able to chip and crack one.

    With all that you had a keyboard that weighed two pounds!

    I rescued one from a dumpster, but couldn't figure out the pin configuration to make any kind of whatever-to-ps2 adapter.

    Even stranger were the IBM 3278 terminal keyboards..they had a weird form of tactile feedback that has to be used to be believed. They were more conventional in terms of layout, but were packaged into a case that, while detached from the terminal itself, was a massive block of metal that weighed in at 2+ pounds.

    The strangest keyboard I think IBM ever made was a keyboard for the Chinese; it was big (I think it was about two feet square) and was laid out like a giant tablet; the left side was a massive set of overlays and "mushy" buttons" with individual characters, and the right side had conventional keys a la the 3270/5250 keyboard. I wish I had some pictures of it...it was in IBM's computer exhibit at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago for years and years, but that exhibit has long since disappeared and with it the keyboard.

    You gotta hand it to IBM...they built their (mainframe) equipment to last. I fully expect to be sitting at the Social Security office when I'm 70+, complaining about my measly $2.53 check with a person sitting in front of an IBM terminal with one of those massive metal keyboards. Fun!

  94. A more modern model M by cgleba · · Score: 1

    If you liked the model M like I do, you can get a more modern version called the "Trackpoint IV".

    Same rugged keys, but it has a PS/2-style connector as well as a built-in trackpoint mouse (ala "nipple"). Plus it comes in black.

    I bought one and it has become my favorite keyboard.

    Picture:

    http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&l r= &ie=UTF-8&q=Trackpoint+IV+keyboard&spell=1

    1. Re:A more modern model M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Trackpoint IV is modern mushy keyboard.

      The board you want it the TrackPoint II (Model M13). Pure Model M goodness with a mouse clit.

    2. Re:A more modern model M by cgleba · · Score: 1

      Oops . . .you are right, it is a Trackpoint II

  95. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  96. Re:Northgate OmniKeys are the best ever! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    All my computers have Omnis on them - I was lucky ? enough to grow up in Minnesota where Northgate once lived. I was also lucky enough to get an entire box (35+) of 101, 101p, 102, Ultra and Plus.

    I have pounded on them, played Quake for countless hours, beat on them in evey way and I'm still on my first ;)

    If you have an Omnikey - the windows (95,98) software has been posted in my last Journal entry, go check it out. Don't forget macros!

    The 101 bug is highly overrated too. I've had my Omnikey go wacky on me a few times, just pull the cable out, hold down 'esc' and plug back in - full reset.

    I think I've seen an USB to PS/2 adapter of some sort on Tiger Direct? or something...

    Best Keyboards Ever

  97. Morse code keyboard by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's my antique keyboard it punches morse code tapes.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Morse code keyboard by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      So...where did you get it, and does it work?
      What a neat unit. I didn't know they existed.
      I have a mil-surplus 5-level typing reperforator.
      (I used to repair Teletype model 33s in college)

    2. Re:Morse code keyboard by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      So...where did you get it, and does it work?

      Works fine, it was found at a hamfest. Model 33's sell for a good price on ebay. I found a 33 ASR at a different hamfest.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  98. I agree completely. by HFXPro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to have problems with my hands hurting after coding all night (for my own fun) with keyboards of the normal type including the IBM model M (I have 3 anyone want one). My outfingers joints would ache, and my hands hurt from twisting my hand into contortions attempting to press all of the special keys which get used quite often while programming.

    I went through several keyboards looking for one which would make it less painful to do something which I really enjoyed. I never wanted to admit to buying anything of an ergonimic keyboard especially one from Microsoft. However, after working on a friends all night, I didn't notice the pain from using it. I ended up ordering a simple Microsoft Elite with the parts for a new computer.

    Since using the this keyboard I find my fingers have rarely hurt unless I'm typing really fast for extended periods of time. Other benefits of this keyboard is that it is reasonably quiet (I don't wake up the house with my typing now) and it feels really good. I don't plan on getting another keyboard anytime soon. The only company that I can say comes close to Microsofts keyboards and mice (I've tried several also) is Logitech (whose mice I usually prefer)

    --
    Reserved Word.
    1. Re:I agree completely. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Do you have any with drainage channels (I think those are the ones made in 1993 and later)? How much? How much is shipping? (UPS Ground, thank you very much...)

    2. Re:I agree completely. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Found one! It was made 8/19/91, doesn't have drainage channels, but it DOES have the quick-connect, but it's missing the F1 and left-shift keys. It was labelled as $3.99, but my grandmother bought it, so she got a 10% senior discount, and then we talked the cashier at Goodwill into selling it to us for 99 cents (plus 7 cents tax) because of the missing keys!

      Pictures before I've taken any crap off (VERY LARGE, may not be uploaded yet because I'm not at home and I've only got a 56K here):

      Front of keyboard
      Back of keyboard
      Label on keyboard

    3. Re:I agree completely. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Geoshitties screwed up the extension. If they don't load, change the extension from .png to .PNG (yes, the capitalization makes a difference!)

  99. They last forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first 386 PC was a IBM PS/Valuepoint (1994). All I can say is that every upgrade since then, Ive used the same keyboard (a "BS" style) and it still works as well as the first day. I hope it never dies!

  100. Great quote! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Them old IBM Clunkers as Sn1per from Virtual Hideout called them..."
    I remember when people had cool online handles. Now its all "Jack12391a" and "Sn1per."

  101. Gateway2000 by PimpDaddie · · Score: 1

    I usually hate the keyboards that come with computers. Either the keys are too small, or the feel is spongy. There is always something. That is why I take my old school Gateway2000 AnyKey programmable keyboard to every job I have had the last 5 years. It is large with a nice touch. It has an extra row of function keys on the left side that I can program for UNIX macros, and it has a complete keypad and a separate 9 key arrow pad on the right. Great for games. I have 3 of them so I don't have to use a computer for work or at home without one.

  102. Still, that dosen't make a lot of sense by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    Then, how do you explain the fact that QWERTY is still very unbalanced? The left hand has much more of a job than the right hand, as studies have shown.

    Dvorak actually tries to put the typist in a better position by putting the keys in such a position so that it would allow them to type in a strumming motion (type one or two letters on the left, one or two on the right).

    On QWERTY, it is so unbalanced that there are plenty of "one hand" words that have to be typed with just one hand, reducing accruacy in most circumstances. The longest one that I know of is "desegregated", while the longest "one hand" word on Dvorak in the entire English language is "papaya".

    On the issue of speed, however, the test have shown that neither will increase your speed if you get used to using them. The conclusion is: Good typists type fast, those who are not don't. It dosen't matter what layout you use. Still, many still switch to the Dvorak keyboard because of comfort, as since 70% of all typing is done on the home row, your fingers move around a lot less, resulting in a much longer typing time before your hands get tired or fingers cramped, etc.

    1. Re:Still, that dosen't make a lot of sense by sparkhead · · Score: 1

      I explain it by an imperfect design.

      Whether Scholes was successful or not with the QWERTY design does not change his intent. He was going for presses by alternating hands as often as possible.

      Read, "Century of the Typewriter" by Wilfred A. Beeching for more information then you'd ever want to know about the history of the keyboard.

    2. Re:Still, that dosen't make a lot of sense by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Then, how do you explain the fact that QWERTY is still very unbalanced?

      Sholes wasn't trying to create a balanced keyboard as far as finger-usage. He was only trying to alleviate the mechanical problems with the hammer bars jamming.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Still, that dosen't make a lot of sense by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Gentoo guys are related to the Dvorak guys. Anytime someone says something good about Redhat or Qwerty they both some crawling out of the woodwork.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  103. old article by sniperindisguise · · Score: 0

    this is an old article.
    posted bout a year ago.

    --
    5i9|\|3d, 5|\|ip3ri|\|di59ui53
  104. Wentek KB-105 by Rand+Race · · Score: 1

    Like an ADB version of the M... and with an adaptor it works with my G4!

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  105. weapon... by crow976 · · Score: 1

    I have some old compaq keyboard here at my job and i swear to god, the thing is so heavy it could be used as a murder weapon... wouldn't want to see this baby drop on the floor! I guess people didn't want their keyboard to move a bit back in the days...

  106. Leading Edge by bzant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have 2 keyboards from Leading Edge 286s. These keyboards are a joy to use. Everytime I see one at a garage sale, or Goodwill I snap it up. I have given them to friends and family, to spread the joy of "real" keyboards.

  107. Different Model M keyboards by FRiC · · Score: 1

    There must be different types of Model M keyboards. Mine is made on 7/23/95 and is really quiet. It's heavy like the keyboards from the 80's, but is even quieter than modern keyboards since the keys don't clatter and move from side to side.

    Personally I prefer the Compaq keyboards from a few years ago. Before they started putting multimedia buttons on the keyboard and using bright colors.

  108. ARGH! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Yet another article passing off oft-told mythology as historical fact. The author writes that "QWERTY was originally designed by Christopher Sholes to slow typing down." This is absolutely incorrect. Sholes designed the QWERTY layout to allow faster typing. As the author explains without actually thinking about it:

    "One of the kinks in the machine was key jamming... If a typist typed two letters one after the other too quickly, the "hammers" would hit each other... So, Sholes came up with a keyboard layout that would place letters which would be most likely struck closely in succession on opposite sides of the layout."

    OK, so how does placing common digraphs at opposite ends of the keyboard "slow typing down"? That's right, it doesn't, as it only required the typist to learn a new key layout. What it does do is reduce the possibility of the hammers colliding and jamming. On an original Sholes typewriter, if you want to hit two letters whose hammers are right next to one another, you have to wait until the first letter is almost all the way back in the resting position before you hit the next letter if you want to avoid a jam. Two letters with hammers at opposite ends, though-- the first letter need only fall back a fraction of the distance before it's out of the path of the next letter. He came up with an elegant solution to an unforseen problem.

    I wish people would stop villifying Sholes with the "he did it to slow us down" story.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:ARGH! by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      Vilifying Sholes REALLY annoys me...he was my great-great-great-great-great-uncle. =P

      I swear I clear up that stupid qwerty-slows-you-down misconception at least twice every time keyboards are mentioned on slashdot.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  109. Interesting??? I think not. by carlcmc · · Score: 1

    Think before you post comments. Look at how your hands sit at the keyboard. They sit at angles and when you extend your fingers do they go straight up and down???? NO! The right hand fingers go about 30 degrees to the left etc. Thats because that is more comfortable than trying to hold both hands parallel and extend the fingers straight that way.

    1. Re:Interesting??? I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, isn't that what he was saying?

  110. Why not Natural/Ergo? by notanatheist · · Score: 1

    I'm one of those few people who enjoy their split keyboard. I've owned my Logitech wireless natural for at least 4 years now. It's my most heavily used keyboard and has stood the test of time quite well and the keys are actually quite responsive. Batteries last nearly 6 months. And perhaps the biggest reason I like the keyboard is I don't have tiny little dainty hands. I was always told growing up that I had fingers for playing piano so the exteneded stretch on the keys is a plus. Now, if only they made a 'smaller' natural keyboard withouth the "Num Pad". Gotta be Logitech though, or at least their key layout. Microsoft's is too clumsy in design.

  111. Boo to the IBM keyboards!! :-) by rayvd · · Score: 1

    Always thought those things were way too loud *ducks*

    What about the Gateway 2000 Anykey keyboards?? I have one myself that I swiped from the computer lab long ago... love the touch, and the programming features come in pretty handy. Can even remap keys to emulate the "MS keys" if you so desire. Occasionally it will get a little outta whack, so it's handy to have a reference on how to clear the thing if ncessary :)

    http://emerson13.home.att.net/AnyKey_Instructions. htm

  112. Disabling Windows Key by vasqzr · · Score: 1

    You can download a program to do it, or you can edit the registry:

    Hive: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
    Key: System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Keyboard Layout
    Name: Scancode Map
    Data Type: REG_BINARY
    Value: 00000000000000000300000000005BE000005CE000000000

    You will probably need to create this value, as it is not present by default. You may wish to cut and paste the value from this page to guard against typos. A reboot may be necessary for it to take effect. Of course, use caution and frequent backups whenever you edit the Registry.

  113. Fujitsu Keyboards by dentar · · Score: 1

    Fujitsu used to make these GREAT keyboards with real switches in 'em. They had this incredible clicky feel to them and I could fly on 'em.

    *sigh* those were the good ole days.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    1. Re:Fujitsu Keyboards by Cecil · · Score: 1

      They still do make those keyboards, but they're not particularily cheap. Check out the Fujitsu 4725/4726 models. Heavy, clicky, and enjoyable. They have Windows keys, unfortunately, but it's almost impossible to get around that these days.

      Fujitsu's 8xxx models are the cheap ones, do not mistake them for the 4xxx series, as they are nothing alike. The 4xxx models are still readily available, I've had no trouble finding them locally, and they're in plenty of places on the net (Google or Froogle for them).

  114. Piling on by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 1
    Aha! An excuse to pimp my paen to the IBM buckling spring battleship 'board!

    Read it while you wait for Viperlair's server to un-Slashdot itself :-).

  115. USB Keyboard/splitter combo? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the USB keyboards which used to have a USB-splitter built in - so that instead of taking of the only USB port on say, a laptop, you would actually come out with one extra.

    I've been looking for these for ages, and I know MS used to make one, but nobody seems to have anything like that anymore. A USB keyboard with a built-in jack always seemed like a good idea to me (if you like USB keyboards), and a lot cheaper/more-convenient than buying a seperate hub just to get that extra port.

    1. Re:USB Keyboard/splitter combo? by KefkaFloyd · · Score: 1

      My MS Internet Keyboard Pro has two USB ports. I believe the MS Office keyboard and the Natural Elite are the only keyboards MS makes with USB ports these days. Plus, with USB keyboards, you never have to worry about using up all your lines as you would with a PS/2 keyboard - great for games where you press more than one key at once.

      --

      Conglom-O: We Own You (TM).
    2. Re:USB Keyboard/splitter combo? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that's the one that I've been looking for. However, either they don't make it anymore, or the local retailers aren't carrying it.

      I may be able to find one yet, having a laptop with only 1 USB port is a pain. As far as comfort/ease-of-use goes, how would you rate this keyboard?

    3. Re:USB Keyboard/splitter combo? by starfish23 · · Score: 1

      Why not just get a mini-hub with four ports. Very small, and cheap too.

    4. Re:USB Keyboard/splitter combo? by KefkaFloyd · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the Internet Keyboard Pro has been discontinued.

      I would say that its action is quiet, but it's not like having a genuine machine gun keyboard. I've been dealing with it, but I miss firm action.

      Also, the letters seem to be wearing off with heavy use - just like they did on my HP keyboard before it. It appears that they're just decals as opposed to etchings.

      I'd say it's a solid keyboard for the price ($20 US when I got it two years ago).

      --

      Conglom-O: We Own You (TM).
  116. I see this mistake all the time. by WesternActor · · Score: 1
    It was named this due to the "q,w,e,r,t,y" pattern in the upper left hand corner of the keyboard. QWERTY was originally designed by Christopher Sholes to slow typing down.

    No no no. QWERTY was not designed to slow typists down, it was designed to allow typists to type faster. The article is correct in pointing out that the hammers of the keys could get "tangled" or locked together, but the conclusion is wrong. While those handle problems were seldom catastrophic, they took time to fix, which could take time away from typing. By moving around the most commonly-used keys, people could type with a lot less fear of having to fix the hammers, and thus type more, longer, and faster. And, of course, the fact that all the keys needed to spell the word "typewriter" are on the upper row of keys and easy for anyone to find even if they've had no typing training, is not exactly a coincidence, either. :)

    --

    --Matthew
    "If the lights of Broadway blind me, I won't mind..."
  117. speaker hole by ImpTech · · Score: 1

    Maybe a little OT, but...

    The article mentions at the end that most Model M's have a speaker hole in their chassis. Well, mine's still actually got the speaker built into it, and I've always wondered if there's a way to get that speaker to do anything. Anybody know?

  118. My trusty keyboard and my kitty. by sequential · · Score: 1

    I lost my cat. I had given up, figured him for dead or just unhappy with the suburban house cat routine. Weeks had gone by, then months.

    One day, I decided I'd clean my keyboard. I had the lingerie bag, the dish washer, philips head screer driver, soap, Goo Gone and some ArmourAll.

    While disassembling my keyboard, I noticed something familiar. Bits of cat hair started to appear. When fully disassembled, I had answered the question: what happened to my kitty?

    I'll miss you, kitty.

  119. dishwasher-safe? by budalite · · Score: 1

    We used to throw the old keyboards in a dishwasher when something sticky was spilled on 'em. Do they still do that?

    1. Re:dishwasher-safe? by Lobo93 · · Score: 1

      I tried that with the keybord which came with my crappy '96 model IBM-Aptiva. Died horribly. But then again, my trusty old Olivetti ANK27-102N survives both the dishwasher and a trip down Victoria Falls. Best of all, it has no M$-key; this key being the ultimate, in-your-face, evidence of a massive Redmondian conspiracy...

      --
      "The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
  120. When was your first time? by BelugaParty · · Score: 1

    taking apart a keyboard? My first time was back in junior high. An old PCjr keyboard. 3/12/93.

  121. I want an animatrix typewriter keyboard! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 0

    The detective in the short titled "A ditective's story has a typewriter that he uses to surf the web. I would really like to see if I couldn't build one. I grew up using an old non electronic typewriter, hated having to use whiteout or editing existing documents, but man that keyboard was sweet. At least I've never found a keyboard as bad as those on some electronic typewriters, but Dell's comes close.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  122. Clicky keyboards available at Maplin too by alib001 · · Score: 1

    For anybody wanting a loud clicky action keyboard there's one available at Maplin suitably called the "CLICK Keyboard".

    They're quite cheap and they have a great action. The first one I had met with an unfortunate end so I've now got two more because I hate typing on spongy keyboards.

    BTW don't take the back off unless you want to fiddle with the hundreds of bits of copper that make the clicks.

  123. what keyboards need is innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, take this pizza key for example. Add on a beer key and I'll buy them in bulk.

  124. Q: where do I find a true programmable keyboard??? by orim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey folks,

    since we're talking about keyboards. I am surprised nobody mentioned programmable keyboards yet. Does anyone use/can recommend any good programmable keyboards these days?

    The one I've used is Gateway's model... I think it's called AnyKey kb. Had four extra buttons in the top right, Program Macro(sticking a series of keystrokes into one key press), Remap(remapping a single key), and an extra column of function keys on the left hand side.

    In any case, in my programming duties, I often find myself needing to do things like reformat 50 lines in an identical fashion. Like take out first four chars on a line, indent, put AAA there, go to next line.
    So with this kb, you didn't have to use software, you just record a macro, use it 50 times, and you're done! Life saver for the fingers/wrists/carpal tunnel.

    Any info appreciated!

    --
    "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
  125. Model M not ESD proof by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    I have a compact version of the IBM model M, it's the same kb, but without the numeric keypad. It does generate the keypad key sequences via a shift mode with keys on the main keyboard. Otherwise it's the same heavy monster as the model M, only slightly smaller. Mine didn't survive a lightning hit to my house that 86'ed my motherboard, network card, and a few other pci interface cards. Thankfully, I was able to find a replacement on ebay, since I couldn't do without that fine keyboard. (I also rebuilt the computer, the cpu, ram and hard disks DID survive).

  126. Speaking of Orginals, by Viceice · · Score: 1

    I feel that the worlds most annoying thing they ever did to the Standard 101 was to place Sleep, Wake and Power in place of PrintScreen, ScrollLock and Pause/Break. It's so f*ing annoying. Ever tried to take a screenshot only to have the screen go blank? Or you're gaming and you need to take a leak right after that only successful move of 1001 moves and you reach for the pause only to have the system shut down? I got so pissed i yanked out the offending keys before condeming the thing and buying a new keyboard.

    The guy who came up with that 'bright' idea should be castrated.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:Speaking of Orginals, by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I saw one worse than that... above the arrow keys, below the insert/delete/pageup/down block, was the reset and power keys...

      directly above the friggin' arrow keys!

      If you missed the up arrow, you'd reset the machine. Horrible, horrible design...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:Speaking of Orginals, by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I find that when I'm hitting Page Up. My new computer has the mushy keyboard from hell, and it's got those power buttons. Thankfully, Wake Up is aligned with Pause/Break and Page Up, so I hit pause and nothing happens, but it's gotten to the point that when I hit Page Down on my old box (reading /., of course), I hit the blank space. (BTW, mine has a Standby key in the middle top - it's an HP multimedia kb, but it's better than the AceType (or whatever the hell it is...)

    3. Re:Speaking of Orginals, by Poeir · · Score: 1

      I have one of these, but with a modification. There's a "Turbo" button that has to be pushed for them to do anything. Since there's not really anywhere else to put them, this strikes me as a pretty good design. The Shift key's a little smaller, but since I can't reach the Turbo button with my pinky even if I try, I've never hit it accidently.

      The version you've seen is a good idea, with a poor implementation.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  127. IBM-M Collection by shadoelord · · Score: 1

    I can't stand new keyboards with the Bell-Dome technology. For this very reason, I've got a collection of Model-M's stashed away. These keyboards last forever. Right now (at work) I'm using the keyboard that came with my PS-2/286. At home I've got one from 1986 on my main computer.

    For you hopeless, porn adicited, social drop outs, you can put these keyboards in the dishwasher.

    --
    this is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:IBM-M Collection by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Agreed - the original PS-2 keyboards are bulletproof.

      But...

      if they last forever, how come you need a stash? ;/

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    2. Re:IBM-M Collection by shadoelord · · Score: 1

      if they last forever, how come you need a stash? ;/

      Simple, I've got more than one machine, at more than one location (ha, simple KVM wont work! ;) ).

      I went to a LAN party once with one sticking out of my backpack (and an optical mouse) and people kinda were like "Wtf?" (computers were provided, but Fsck if I'm going to use their kb's and mice)

      --
      this is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
  128. Absolute Crap by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

    This guy is a moron. He's just some guy that "remembers the glory days" of keyboards. I'll agree with him that there are new, cheap keyboards that are crap. But, notice that he's only comparing his old keyboard to these cheap ones because he can get a version of his old one from a flea market or garage sale for $5? If he were to compare them to something decent these days, he would find that there are plenty of good, new keyboards out there. You just have to be willing to fork over the cash.

    And another thing, concerning his deal about "but I have always been a believer that ergonomic keyboards not only hinder a typist, but also do not relieve any stress from typing. I never proved that of course, but I've always felt more 'natural' with standard keyboards." He's just absolutely wrong here (and, btw, you should go read the BBC article he points to - complete B.S.). The reason he feels more "natural" with standard keyboards is because that's all he's used. I guarantee you he has never used an ergonomic keyboard for more than a couple of minutes. If he would use one for any amount of time longer, he would come to appreciate their comfort. I, personally, made the switch to ergonomic keyboards about 2 years ago. I had a mild case of CTS, and was urged to do so by a doctor. It did take some getting used to, but now I'll never go back. It really is just so much more comfortable. Now "standard" keyboards feel small and cramped to me. Oh, and I haven't had a single CTS problem since.

    By the way, the ergonomic keyboard I use currently is the Microsoft Natural (unfortunately, this link is to the "Natural Elite", which sucks with its small arrow keys). Yes, I agree that the stupid function buttons are useless (especially since I run Debian), but it's not like they get in my way. I actually do use the USB connectors on the back of the keyboard, as the back of my machine is kind of hard to get to. There are only two complaints I would make about it. First, the space bar has worn in a little, so if you're off-center by more than an inch and a half or so, it may not trigger. This is very seldomly a problem, however. Second is that the Function keys are a bit small. Not that function keys are usually a big part of my keyboard use, but it would be nice to have them be the same size as the rest of the letter keys.

    I do wish that I had the money to try out one of those cool-looking Kinesis keyboards, though. :)

    1. Re:Absolute Crap by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
      I think the difference that the author of the article, and many others, including myself, notice between modern and old glory days keyboards is the difference in the feel from membrane and switching keyboards. There IS a difference in feel and the switching keyboards definantly have a more comfrotable feel to them. The better modern keyboards are designed to emulate the feel of the old switching keyboards (when one key is pressed, we're not talking about keyboard arrangement which is a different topic). There is almost no argument that the feel of a switching keyboard is better, however they are heavier, which most consumers don't want, they are more expensive to produce, which most consumers don't want, and they make noise when each key is pressed, which most consumers' spouces don't want.

      So far as the ergonomic keyboard points go, I agree, but what would absolutly rock is a switch keyboard with an ergonomic design.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    2. Re:Absolute Crap by kahei · · Score: 1

      The kinesis keyboard that the original article refers to is just such an ergonomic keyboard that uses real switches. It rocks -- I'm typing this with it now and I'm always conscious of a vague poorness of design when I have to use a staggered flat mushy keyboard. Click go the keys -- but not my tendons.

      Incidentally, the original article 'Absolute Crap' contained sensible comments, so it shouldn't have a name that makes me automatically assume it's a troll. It should have been called 'Sir, I find myself forced to differ from you on more than one point'. Or something.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    3. Re:Absolute Crap by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      No, what the original poster was saying is that you can buy a brand-new, full-featured keyboard with the BS switches.

      They just cost $75-$125.

      Which most people won't pay in an age of $10 membrane keyboards.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    4. Re:Absolute Crap by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 1
      [MS Natural keyboards] Yes, I agree that the stupid function buttons are useless (especially since I run Debian)

      They don't have to be useless. You may not know how to use them, but that Usenet message should get you started. The same commands should work on *BSD and any x86 machine running X as well. The mapping I use most often is one that maps the "Mail" button to "xvidtune -next", so changing resolutions for watching movies or playing games only requires one finger. HTH,

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    5. Re:Absolute Crap by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

      so it shouldn't have a name that makes me automatically assume it's a troll

      Good point - I'll remember that next time.

      Also, if I might ask, which Kinesis did you end up with? I surf their website from time to time, but I can never decide which model to try.

    6. Re:Absolute Crap by kahei · · Score: 1


      A Contour, the mid-range model which is programmable but cheaper than the high-end model. The contour is their main keyboard; that funny one in two halves seems to be intended as an executive toy.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  129. If you use GNOME, ACME is what you want by Mongoose · · Score: 1

    apt-get install -u acme

    Or however you install it in your distro.

    Applications > Desktop Preferences > Multimedia Keys

    You can map things like screensaver, volume, and boring windowing commands (like shade, min, max, etc) to a single key. I use it for my laptop's diamond keys.

  130. Avant Stellar by Animus+Howard · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's funny that I never see the Avant Stellar (http://www.cvtinc.com/) mentioned in these discussions about keyboards. It has a significant flaw (see below) but it's still my favorite. Great "clicky" feel, very firm, 100% programmable, macros, two sets of function keys (so you can reprogram the ones you don't normally use)... Lots of good stuff!

    The problem is that their programming software doesn't work on NT/2000/XP, just 95/98/ME. It's not a problem for me because I use a KVM switch to connect six systems to the same keyboard/monitor/mouse, and one of my systems is Windows 98, so I just run the software on that system and switch to it when I need to change something.

    I have it programmed so that some of the unused function keys have macros that tell the KVM to switch to different systems. Single-key switching from Windows 2000 to Linux...

    1. Re:Avant Stellar by RelentlessWeevilHowl · · Score: 1

      Go check the website again. They have software for 2000/XP now. No NT, though.

    2. Re:Avant Stellar by Animus+Howard · · Score: 1

      > They have software for 2000/XP now.

      Well I'll be darned, you're right! I saw that they had a 2000/XP version but their online FAQ says:

      Software version 4.0 for Windows 2000 or Windows XP does not have an upload feature.

      I thought that meant that you could not send a configuration to the keyboard, so I didn't even bother to install it. But their terminology is ass-backwards and it really means that you can't retrieve the currect configs from the keyboard. That's not a big deal since you can save your configuration in a disk file.

      This is fantastic! I can now recommend the Stellar without reservation! 'Scuse me, gotta go... I've got some keyboard evangelizing to do on another BBS that I frequent! It's really too bad that this Slashdot thread is about to fall off the end of the list, or I'd do it here too...

  131. condensed history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pah! Try this :

    .

    It doesn't get much more condensed than that.

  132. Scene from a bad comedy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Geek typing at keyboard in front of computer. Keyboard makes excruciating clackety-clack-clackety-clack-clack sounds. Two coworkers come up behind the geek.]

    Coworker #1: Christ, I can't believe your keyboard makes so much noise!

    Geek: That's just because it's so rock solid.

    Coworker #2: A rock solid keyboard? What the hell are you talking about?

    Geek: This!

    [The geek picks up the keyboard and cracks open the skull of both of his coworkers, who crash to the floor, dead. He glances, grinning manically at his bloodied keyboard.]

    Geek: Thank God it's easy to clean!

    [He kisses the keyboard.]

  133. The real truth about QWERTY by radd0 · · Score: 1

    The QWERTY keyboard lay-out was originally designed to speed up typing by reducing clashes. The layout was not meant to inhibit the typists abilities, but to rearrange the mechanical layout of the typebars so that they were less likely to jam.

    Relevant links:

    Why QWERTY Was Invented

    A Brief History of Typewriters

    Carbons to Computers: Typewriters

    Early Office Museum Typewriters

    -r

  134. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/04/057218 &mode=thread&tid=137

  135. windows dvorak support by lordlod · · Score: 2, Informative

    "... all windows versions greater than 3.11 are Dvorak compliant, and a simple setting can change the layout setting."

    As a user that normally runs dvorak and occasionly windows I can assure you this isn't quite true.

    I've used a dvorak mapping in windows 98, 2000 and XP and all have buggy implementations, though they are getting slightly better. The catch is that the remappable keys seems to have been a tacked on feature, some programs will work, some programs will work for a while and some seem to use direct keyboard access, ignoring any mapping.

    For example I recall I was working with a notepad session and a command prompt. After a while the command prompt decided it would start running qwerty, so everytime I switched between the windows I had to pause to remind myself which keyboard mapping I was using. Games are also really bad, Half-life for example uses the dvorak mapping in the menu but uses stardard qwerty layout in the game. This makes key binding from the menu a wonderful activity.

    I've been running dvorak for about 8 months now and its not about speed, its all in the name of comfort.

    1. Re:windows dvorak support by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

      I've been running dvorak for about 8 months now and its not about speed, its all in the name of comfort.

      Ditto. I bet if you ask any Dvorak user what they like most about it, it won't be "I can type crazy fast" but rather that it is simply more comfortable most of the time. There are a few words that are awkward, but 99% are much more comfortable to type.

      And that alone could make overall typing speed better, since it is less tiring on the hands/wrists. But for raw afterburner typing speed, anyone wanting to get that fast could do it on any layout.

      --

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  136. My favorite was the Sun 3/50 kybd by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Durable and nice feedback on the keys.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  137. Natural Elite keyboard is great! =) by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I myself use a Microsoft Natural Elite keyboard.

    Despite some reservations about the small size of the navigation keys on this keyboard (which I can understand some user's legitimate concerns), I love it because I can type all day and not have wrist pain afterward, mostly because you don't have to turn your wrists at an unnatural angle to type. The newer MS keyboards based on the Natural layout have a lot of keys are effectively overkill unless you are heavily into multimedia; the MS Natural Elite is all the keyboard I ever need.

  138. Better than the IBM "M" keyboard by senahj · · Score: 2, Informative

    was the Northgate Computer Systems Omnikey.

    For those of us who learned to program before the
    advent of the IBM PC, they have the "correct" layout
    (the layout for which and with which vi was developed)
    with the control key just to the left of the 'a', As God Intended)*
    Buckling spring, Alps switches, removable keycaps, steel base,
    fully programmable key assignments, DIP switches for common
    configuration options. Indispensible and indestructible.

    I have two, and they continue to work perfectly after
    lo these many years, and there's a brisk market for them
    on ebay (lots of old hackers treasure them).

    But they're no longer made.

    Fortunately, CTI makes a close copy. The Avant Stellar
    is by all accounts superb, and bears the Tibor Polgar seal of approval.
    Buy a couple while they're still made, and you're set for life.

    The Customizer seems to be similar, but I have no experience with this keyboard.

    * and if you're one of those people like me who has spent the
    last twenty years cursing IBM for screwing up the layout of
    ASCII keyboards for all time by fiddling with the the
    One True Layout (with the control key to the left of the 'a'),
    then you may be happy to know about the superb small program
    ctrl2cap from Systems Internals, which makes the
    usless never-to-be-sufficiently-damned caps lock key
    into a control key. Tiny, slick, sophisticated, open source, free.
    Check it out.

    --
    Wait a minute. Didn't I say that on the other side of the record? I'd better check ...
  139. BS? Give me the Hall Effect by ratboy666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in the day (before "PC") we had REAL word processors. the MICOM P2000 came with a keyboard that had magnets in plungers, and solid-state pickups for each of the keys. A spring completed the key assembly. Very weighty keys, slowed down the typing nicely. Since switches, etc. were not involved, dishwashers were routinely employed to clean them. And these keyboards were servicable. And they weighed in at 15lbs (7 kilos). Which made them a VERY formidable weapon.

    Before that I used an ASR-33. WHACK WHACK WHACK. Very satisfying. Built up my finger strength. Problem is, now I punch holes THROUGH these new "girly-man" keyboards. Such posers.

    Seriously, the IBM BS keyboards are my favorites. A bit noisy, but the tactile feedback is worth it. My current keyboard (some "no-name" thing) has the nasty habit of "vibrating" at the bottom end of each keystroke. Feels nasty.

    Ratboy.

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  140. BTC-5339 : Best keyboard by mjihad · · Score: 1

    The BTC-5339 keyboard was the best I have ever used. It has soft foam inside the keys, while still being a mechanical keyboard, which makes for a soft, pleasing feedback. One of its nice features is the non-matrix based circuitry, meaning that you can hit any number of keys(useful for StepMania) at the same time.

    The model M has harder keys and louder clicking noise, but has a great feel as well. Unfortunately, I have the small model without the numeric keypad, which means that one has to press Shift+Scroll lock to shift between a regular keyboard and numeric keypad input mode. Worse, it seems to default to numeric keypad mode(at least in Windows 2000 with the Japanese IME enabled), which is annoying. But the detachable cord is really cool.

  141. Local Government surplus by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    I found all four of mine (three at home, one at work) at local government surplus sales. These things last forever. One of my keyboards is 14 years old and still works perfectly. Government suplus sales are good place to find them as they don't throw away stuff that works if they can avoid it and all those office workers have moved over to those crappy Dell mushy keyboards.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  142. Re:Q: where do I find a true programmable keyboard by yoyodyne · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is nice:
    http://www.monu-cad.com/keyboard.htm

  143. I Want My Cherry Hall-Effect Back by po8 · · Score: 1

    The best keyboard I ever owned, far and away, was the Cherry ANSI-standard keyboard I had on my Northwest Microcomputer Systems NMS85P circa mid-1980s. (The NMS85P was an excellent 8085-based S100 CP/M system that was favorably reviewed by Byte Magazine back in the day: my father owned 1/3 of NMS.)

    This keyboard had a beautiful layout, and featured Hall-effect keyswitches: no electrical contact whatsover, quiet, and positive-action.

    At one point, the bail on the space bar was broken in an accident, and my younger brother decided to fix it...with Super Glue. I came home to find the whole insides glued together. After 1/2 hour with acetone, I had cleaned out the glue---and the keyboard worked fine!

    Boy do I miss that keyboard.

  144. Ergonomics...bah by sahala · · Score: 1
    I have observed that smoking cigarettes do more to prevent typing injuries than using bulky ergonomic keyboards.

    Something about stepping away for a few minutes...

  145. What I want... by lacrymology.com · · Score: 1

    is a keyboard that will cause hearing loss and is fully configurable. I want F1 to be del and 7 to be Q and . to be SHIFT and .... -m

    --

    #
    # Modus Ponens
    #
  146. Total Cost of Ownership by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    I've been using the same IBM Model M keyboard for the last thriteen years. It has never failed me. Not once. My wife, on the other hand, has burned through seven keyboards in the last twelve years, including one very overpriced MS Natural. She has spent much more money on her cheap keybaords than I have spent on my single, still-working Model M. I am very confident that my Model M will still be working in another 13 years (even if I do end up having to get a PS/2 - USB converter to keep using it) and I really doubt if the keyboard she has now will still be working by the end of this year.

    Sure, the Model M costs more, but you get what you pay for.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Total Cost of Ownership by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      She has spent much more money on her cheap keybaords than I have spent on my single, still-working Model M.

      Sure that it's still-working?

  147. QWERTY wasn't about slowing the typist! by jgoeres · · Score: 2, Informative
    The idea that QWERTY was designed specifically to slow users' typing is a myth. It was designed to prevent key jamming, but the way it accomplished this was through a key arrangement that made it likely that the hammers for commonly paired letters would come from different parts of the bank (not necessarily opposite sides -- just sufficiently distant from each other).

    Of course, the side effect of that was sub-optimal typing speed and accuracy, but it certainly wasn't done just for that reason.

  148. What do you mean 'those were the days'? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

    On my desk at work right now I have a SBA 100A 1553A/B bus analyser, with a solid steel keyboard. It has burn marks on it from where it was left too close to a jet engine on the afterburner test rig, yet still works. I think it's actually older than I am!

    Now, should any kind slashdotter have a manual for the aforementioned bus analyser, that would be most handy...

    --
    Beep beep.
  149. Feh--It's all a matter of familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter WHICH keyboard you have---the most important thing is to keep one which you are accustomed to. I've had a MS "Natural" keyboard for about eight years now (same keyboard) and I love it. It's not the newer version with the funkified ins/del/home/end key block or anything---just the curve.

    As for the 'click' being important for typing---keyboards with the blisters aren't necessarily lacking in this respect. I never have to look at the screen to make sure that a button registered---only to make sure that I didn't make a typo in the course of my writing.

    I think the real reason a lot of people prefer the older keyboard models is that for whatever reason they are more comfortable with the layout and pressure of the keys, probably due to familiarity rather than intrinsic virtues of the technology.

  150. Scroll Lock by My+name+isn't+Tim · · Score: 1

    Has anyone used Scroll Lock in the last 10 years?

  151. Microsoft keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all know the microsoft keyboard, don't you?

    http://users.auth.gr/~salaxi/various/jpg/ctralde .j pg

  152. I use fujitsu keyboards at work/home, love em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i do have some IBM Ms in my garage, need ot find the connector for em...

    1. Re:I use fujitsu keyboards at work/home, love em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my fujitsu has blocking issues (down arrow, then add left arrow, everything stops).

      Anyone know if the old IBMs have this problem?

  153. What about keytronic? by shadowpuppy · · Score: 1

    My favorite keyboards are the Keytronic ones. I find the feel compareable to the IBM keyboards. And they don't make that clicky noise. There a few thing I realy like about them.

    1. Durability. The one I have at home has survived 6 years of mistreatment and neglect.

    2. Keyspacing. Many of the cheaper keybords seem to be slightly smaller and it's really annoying.

    3. Feel. The keys don't wobble like a Microsoft keyboard. And the action seems to be excellent.

    The main problem, I have with them is that thier website doesn't list any ergonomic keyboards. And I may want to get one of those eventually.

  154. Now that's a good idea by zubernerd · · Score: 1

    I never thought of that, rearraging the keys, that sounds like a good idea, I think I'll try it. Thankx. Mod up the parent "Re: ..."

    --
    Accentuate the positive, don't waste your mod points on the negative.
  155. The Model M by jtnishi · · Score: 1

    How incomplete would all these comments be without mentioning modelm.org, probably the uber-fansite about the favorite keyboard. The mboard that pimps, indeed.

  156. Re:Q: where do I find a true programmable keyboard by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

    Well, the Kinesis keyboards are fully programable/remapable. Very comfortable too.

    I like, but they are expensive.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  157. MIT Space Cadet Keyboard? by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    I've read about these in ESR's _The New Hacker's Dictionary_, and have been trying to find more information about them but to no avail. Has anybody ever seen or used one, or have pointers to information (ahem, more links to The Jargon File need not apply)? Pictures would be great. Thanks!

    Last Minute Google Search!
    Search for "LISP Machine" turns up a few pages, such as this one, with information on the Symbolics machine, and has a picture of the keyboard, complete with the all-important control/super/hyper/meta keys. Still interested in more info on the MIT LISP machine, though!

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  158. It especially surprising, since link is in article by Kelmenson · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, the would entail people reading the article...

  159. Monster Keyboards by Wolfgame · · Score: 1

    I've been seeing more and more "innovation" in the arena of keyboards, which is mostly complete crap. I like the concept of the apple keyboard that lights up briefly when & where you hit a key, but for the most part its all a waste of money. About 6 or 7 years ago, Gateway 2000 stopped carrying the 124 key AnyKey keyboard, made by maxi-switch. Now this is a mean keyboard. The thing has 4MB of ram on it for storing key sequences, and you can reprogram the keyboard itself, so if you want it to be a dvorak, for instance, you can make the change, and it will carry over with you when you take that keyboard to another computer, regardless of OS or current system state. Add to that the 8-way directional cursor keys, a second asterix key, a second spacebar (in the middle of the cursor keys), and a second set of function keys (great place to store key sequences), and you've got a hell of a keyboard. Not to mention that it's just got that right feel and weight to it. And it's virtually indestructible.

    --
    -- My childhood bathtoys were Toaster and Hairdryer
  160. Re:Q: where do I find a true programmable keyboard by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a problem that should be solved through software, not hardware. Not everyone wants a "record macro" button on their keyboard (or, for that matter, a volume control, a "connect to the internet" button, or a "go shopping" button, to name other common and superfluous keys.)

  161. PCKeyboard.com by retro128 · · Score: 2, Informative
    When my old clicky keyboard broke down I searched far and wide for a replacement. I didn't want el cheapo keyboard for $10 from the corner corner store...I wanted a brick, like the first IBM PS/2 keyboards. Eventually all paths lead to PCKeyboard.com. The blurb from their webpage reads as follows:

    Unicomp is a keyboard manufacturer located in the heart of Bluegrass Country, Lexington, Kentucky. Yes, we are a new company; but if you know IBM or if you know Lexmark International, you already know a good bit about us. Unicomp was started in April, 1996 when we purchased keyboard technology from Lexmark International. You may recall that Lexmark manufactured the high quality keyboards for IBM computers and terminals prior to 1996.

    In other words, these things are about as close to the original IBM keyboards as you can get. I've owned mine for three years now and I love it.
    --
    -R
  162. "Old" Keyboards? by inicom · · Score: 1

    Is Timothy 12 years old? Does he think computers began with the PS/2? What kind of misleading subject line is that supposed to be? An article comparing a PS/2 keyboard to a Active Response membrane keyboard does not qualify as a "history of the keyboard".

    A quick websearch gives numerous better accounts of 1981-present computer keyboards.

    For me personally, a "real" keyboard is a circa 1979 Cherry keyboard, because they are the first ones to make relatively inexpensive ($200) super-well-built keyboards. They used individual, replaceable switches for each key. They were available with an RS232 or parallel interface for hooking to a real computer.

    I even used Univac keyboards where a large circuit board was packed with 1n914 diodes for encoding the keys. Keyboards with real metal coiled springs, not plastic leaf springs.

    --
    -a.e.mossberg
  163. Guess this is the wrong crowd to mention... by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

    Zero-feedback keyboards... Once the skill is learned, it is so much easier on the hands. I will be the first to say it is a pain in the neck to learn typing on a flat touchpad, but it is also worth it.

    This is the other end of the spectrum from the M's. I wouldn't go after ZF typing if this keyboard didn't offer so many benefits.

    --

    Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  164. Condensed history? Yeah right! by shrikel · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This isn't a condensed history! It's a two page paper on the difference between two IBM keyboards, and a little commentary on why he likes the old keyboards better. Oh, plus two paragraphs on why the qwerty and dvorak keyboards were invented.

    Which is BS, by the way. It wasn't to avoid jamming the keys by slowing the typist down, but by making sure the commonly-used key levers weren't close enough to each other to jam. And I think that the dvorak layout was designed to put the most commonly-used keys right under the fingertips, not just within reach of the "strongest fingers." Geez, like you need really STRONG fingers to type faster.

    I have no problem with talking all you like about the differences between keyboards and why you prefer one over the other. Reminiscing is fun sometimes. But don't tout it as a "condensed history of the keyboard." Just call it "One guy's ideas about keyboards."

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  165. Noisy. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    It's impossible to find a zero-keyclick, zero-tactile-feedback keyboard any more.

    Is Gateway still making the AnyKey line?

    I know it's impossible to get a DEC LK40X any more, much less interface it to a PS2 or USB connector...

  166. Tell Logitec to get the FLOCK out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been nothing but pissed at logitech lately for their damned cursed POS keyboards.

    WTF is up with this FLOCK bullshit? The F-Keys should be the DEFAULT not those poo poo frilly "email" etc functions. When I turn on the computer and I hit F2, I expect it to trigger the damn BIOS setup like the screen says. I shouldn't have to FLOCK myself and then press F2. It's screwed up. I boycott Logitech for this reason. I won't buy any of their $hit.

    There. I said it. I feel better.

  167. Smartboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Smartboard keyboard from DataDesk looks interesting. It sortof uses a grid, but it is in a fan pattern. It accomplishes this by making the keys different sizes. Keys further up the keyboard are larger.

    I can't comment on how well this works, but intuitively, it seems like it might be better (for me, a MS Natural user).

  168. Re:Q: where do I find a true programmable keyboard by jonadab · · Score: 1

    I have an Avant Stellar, and I'm very pleased with it. It's got
    the good kind of keys (not the membrane ones), and it's fully
    programmable, fully remappable. And if you don't want to remap
    the three or four keys used for remapping (right ctrl, non-keypad
    uparrow, and I forget which other ones) you can remap the keys on
    the fly without any special software (read: OS is irrelevant).
    Though, since I need to remap right ctrl, I have to use the
    (Win32-based) remapping software whenever I want to change the
    layout. Fortunately, I don't change the layout very often.

    Yeah, it does macros and junk too.

    > In any case, in my programming duties, I often find myself needing
    > to do things like reformat 50 lines in an identical fashion.

    Any remotely decent text editor can do this, no problem. But as
    long as what you have to do each time consists of identical
    keystrokes you could also achieve it with this keyboard, yes.
    Personally, I find that a lot of the repetitive editing I have
    to do doesn't consist of identical keystrokes each iteration, so
    I use Emacs lisp quite a bit. Sometimes I find myself doing the
    same thing often enough that I write a re-usable function, like
    this one... ;; Sorry about the lack of decent indentation; I had to work ;; around the lameness filter.
    (defun dehyphenate-interactively ()
    "Walk through the current buffer from point to point-max looking for
    hyphens on the end of lines and asking the user whether to dehyphenate each."
    (interactive) (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "- *$" (point-max) t)
    (let ((hyphenated-word (concat (buffer-substring (save-excursion (re-search-backward " ") (forward-char 1) (point)) (save-excursion (re-search-backward " ") (end-of-line 1) (point))) (buffer-substring (point) (save-excursion (re-search-forward " ") (backward-char 1) (point))))))
    (if (y-or-n-p (concat "Dehyphenate " hyphenated-word " ?"))
    (progn (while (save-excursion (backward-char 1) (looking-at "[- \t]")) (backward-delete-char 1)) (while (looking-at "[- \t\n]") (delete-char 1)))
    (forward-char 1))))))

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  169. Fable of the Fable by cryptoluddite · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The site mentions Liebowitz's article that contrary to common sense and empirical data the QWERTY layout is better than the Dvorak one. Lieby claims Dvorak (the man) used special texts designed to make his keyboard look superior, but you can try it yourself on virtually any text and verify Dvorak's numbers.

    Dvorak users consistently report less effort in typing and that it just "feels" better, but they must be wrong since QWERTY is better. QED. Even though the fastest typer uses dvorak and other dvorak typers cleaned house in competitions, these results are all faked or "suspect". Even though all reason points to markets acheiving local maxima, just like theory says they should, Liebo insists that if one just defines the value of technology based on what the market has chosen then it proves that the market always right.

    And oh yeah, therefore Microsoft never had an OS monopoly.

  170. Looking for one new? by jsupreston · · Score: 1

    Check out this site: http://pckeyboard.com. They were featured in an MSNBC.com article. These folks were spun off from Lexmark a while back and still make the old keyboards (and can repair them too). You can also get one with a pencil eraser mouse built in!

    --
    "It's a dog eat dog world out there, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear."- Norm (from Cheers)
  171. Re:Q: where do I find a true programmable keyboard by jonadab · · Score: 1

    Macros should be done in software, but hardware remapping is very
    useful. This allows you to change the physical layout of the keys,
    and the keyboard keeps that new layout for all software (including
    if you change OSes, use the keyboard with another computer, whatever).
    Good for scenerios where what you really want is to have certain keys
    just be in different places.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  172. Don't think it was BS (didn't feel like it) by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    But Dell used to ship a very nice keyboard with some of their servers. Enormous, heavy thing which was really loud and clicky. I swear I got an extra 5 wpm out of that thing. Gorgeous.

  173. Washed ashore? by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    Not MY old keyboard. That thing was solid, and heavy enough to drive nails with, so it would go stright to the bottom. But I'll tell you what... When plate tectonics brought it back up in, oh, 300 million years, once future archeologists excavated it from the surrounding stone, it would work as well as today.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  174. Keyboard for left handers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just filed a patent on a keyboard for left handers. Called the YTREWQ (why-truke).

  175. Old-Timers: Help me identify this keyboard! by davey_darling · · Score: 1
    Do you know what this keyboard is for?

    It's got strange keys like HEX, V COR/AX DUP, LCA, ALPHA, REPEAT, CHAR, BYPASS/PROG, CMND/REL and FIELD

    It was made by Cortron, but has no identifying marks on the outside.

    If you want it, pay the shipping and it's yours!

  176. I was first to break a PC keyboard! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    Those original PC keyboards were sturdy, but not unbreakable, as I have reason to know. I was one of the programmers working under contract on the original then-top-secret IBM-PC project, and I knocked one of the keyboards off a desktop, and managed to damage the internal electronics so badly that a whole row of keys no longer worked.

    I suspect that I'm probably the first person in the world to break a PC keyboard. It's not much of a claim to fame, but it's better than nothing. :)

  177. Re:Q: where do I find a true programmable keyboard by orim · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree with your sentiment on those useless volume control-multimedia keys. What a waste of kb space.
    However, when it comes to recording short macros, I prefer mine completely on the kb-side.
    1) They're faster
    2) OS-independent
    3) Easier to record
    4) Sometimes applications read keystrokes "more directly" than the macro-recorder/playback software. Can't explain it better than that, except that the software solutions don't always work in all the apps.

    --
    "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
  178. Re:Northgate OmniKeys are the best ever! by yAm · · Score: 1

    Yup, I drove past them everyday to my job just down the frontage road from 'em. I guess that's why I bought one. I associated PC's with Northgate.

    386/20 with 2M RAM and a 40M HD that lasted me six years (of course by then it had an 80387, 8M RAM and an additional 170M HD). The sales guy offered to upgrade me to a 100M drive for $300 more.

    "No way. I'll never use all of that..."

    Go figure.

    --

    Chris

    So Buddha walks into a pizza parlor and says: "Hey, make me one with everything."

  179. key debouncing story by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once had a keyboard with a minor defect. The '6' key (the one above the letters, not the keypad one) felt normal, but would usually spit out "666" each time it was hit. All the other keys were fine. Got pretty annoying typing "6^H^H" to get a 6. I finally donated it to a Christian charity.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  180. I want an ergonomic one of these by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    I love my MS Natural keyboard for the fact that my wrists don't hurt nearly as much.

    But I really love the old keyboards with their feel. I really wish someone would make a combo one - old technology meets new design.

  181. I still use mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I type this message on IBM FRU NUMBER 1392090 keyboard serial number 7156879, DOM 11-19-1991. This is the newest keyboard I possess. These old IBM keyboards, as well as Northgates, are modular, so they work with AT and PS/2 with the proper modular cord. They will essentially last an indefinite period of time, and they can usually still be found in dusty boxes at the back of old warehouses or closets in server rooms. Often they are a bit dirty and require cleaning, but the method of construction makes them very resilient.

    The best part is, they are 1000 times nicer to type on than anything made today, and every PC groks them. No 'windows' keys, 'e-mail' keys, or any other nonsense, just 12 function keys, a nice numeric keypad, a T and editing keygroup, plain old PC103 :o).

    I guess us old farts know what we like.

  182. Same here by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    I used to have problems with my hands hurting after coding all night (for my own fun) with keyboards of the normal type including the IBM model M (I have 3 anyone want one). My outfingers joints would ache, and my hands hurt from twisting my hand into contortions attempting to press all of the special keys which get used quite often while programming.

    Yeah, I got meself one of thoes Mtype keyboards off ebay -- and while I love the tactile click -- it really starts to kill my fingers and arms to the point it would actually get numb. So I got rid of it(not worth getting carpal syn.) and went back to the soft and sleek logitech keyboards.

    The problem is, not everyone has problems with BS keyboards -- and they're lucky bastards if I might say. Why does it hurt? Each keypress requires a force, and then pushes a force backup. That tactile sensensation has to be absorbed by some joint, which unfortunately my fingers cannot handle.

  183. really interesting keyboard by jhhl · · Score: 1

    I'm really asking for a slashdotting, but anyway:

    This is a keyboard used by telephone information operators in NYC. It's made of steel, letters in ALPHABETICAL order (vowels in gray), and there are buttons on the side for each borough!

    --
    -- Real Stupidity is the Artificial Intelligence of the 21st century
  184. Whats the blank button on a sun keyboard for? by SuDZ · · Score: 1

    Speaking of keyboards what is the blank key next to the Help button on a sun keyboard for? Does anyone here know. I have been wondering this and figured I would throw it in.

    SuDZ

  185. Kienzle keyboards rocked! Model M's too by kobotronic · · Score: 1

    In the 1980s my dad worked as a programmer for a german computer manufacturer, Mannesmann Kienzle GmbH. They made proprietary non-PC terminals with super ergonomics (they had stuff like 100Hz refresh rates on hi-rez eye-friendly paperwhite terminals years before anything like it appeared in the PC world.)

    The keyboards they made were particularly cool: The circuit board was sealed and coated and had holes for each key. The circuitry on the board formed spiral coils around each hole, and the key presses sent small rubber-cushioned magnet rods moving through the holes, causing magnetic induction to register the keypresses. No mechanical switches, no exposed contact surfaces. Great reliability, and easy maintenance.

    The demos at the shows had the operator flooding the unit with lukewarm coffee while the operator kept on typing (slosh, slosh, slosh!) Cleaning the keyboard required just flushing it with water.

    Nowadays I use an old-skool IBM model "M" keyboard scavenged on an auction for a buck or two. I love it very much! I feel my typematic rate going through the roof and I make very few typos while using it. My Dell laptop has a PS/2 port, so I can use it on that when at my desk, but my Compaq unfortunately has only USB. How do you connect a PS/2 keyboard to a USB-only machine?

  186. A POST OF GREAT IMPORTANCE by term0r · · Score: 1

    I thought of a great witty reply, but its just not my day :(

    "Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING."

  187. Typing this on an Olivetti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And sitting behind the monitor is a Chicony KB-2931, with a honeywell on the floor. The olivetti, taken from a 286 I got for $5, is better, as well as having a PS/2 connection. At home I need to use a USB keyboard until I get a new motherboard (don't ask, but sparks occured), and have a reasonable one, but haven't seen a good one yet.

    To be even more ridiculous, the monitor is a HITACHI 17 inch from 1992, while the much newer Viewsonic 17GS sits behind me as an unused spare waiting for the next new employee (that's if they don't get the good one on the sparc 20).

  188. QWERTY urban legend by evilviper · · Score: 1
    QWERTY was originally designed by Christopher Sholes to slow typing down.

    Yeah... That was about the same time that George Washington chopped down his father's cherry tree, right?...

    The idea that a keyboard would be designed to slow you down makes no sense. First of all, you don't have to be slowed down to prevent keys from colliding, you would rather, want to evenly distribute the keys across the keyboard... In other words, the nearer two keys are to each other, the more chance that they will stick together. The best thing to do would be to evenly distribute the keys that would commonly be hit in sequence, to be as far apart as possible.

    Also, to futher contradict himself, a few lines later he writes:
    due to the ability to touch type with QWERTY efficiently


    That's right... Sholes did one freakin' horrible job if he was trying to make his keyboard ineffecient, because nobody can type +100WPM on an alphabetical keyboard, yet they can on QWERY. And, although people are able to type faster on Dvorak keyboards, the gap between QWERTY keyboardists and Dvorak keyboardists is NOT all that large... If QWERTY was really designed to make typing difficult, then comparing it to a keyboard that is designed to be easy should yeild a difference in typing speed of more than an order of magnitude.

    It's all too obvious that this "QWERTY: Designed for in-effenciency" thing is nothing more than an urban legend, but I would like to know if somebody out there has some real info. As in facts, such as first-hand accounts from Sholes or anyone that know him directly... That I might believe. I admit I don't know what the true story is, but I'm sure nobody that knows the facts would say it was designed to be hard to use.



    Also, I'd like to say that everyone on the planet should try a Dvorak keyboard... They are far better. But more than that, you should check out the Typematrix... It's really designed the opposite of every other keyboard around, and it's much better in ways you wouldn't think of... For instance, it is instantly relaxing when you put your fingers on the keys, which are not inclined like every other keyboard, but declining.

    And just to prevent getting accused of astroturfing, I have no connection with the company, other than having been a customer... The only reason I'm a customer is because I was looking for a Dvorak keyboard (I'd always heard good things and was interested in trying one finally) and found their site, only to be immeditately interested by the disign of the keyboard. Even if you still type QWERTY, it will be a much more comfortable keyboard than anything else.

    You can see the QWERTY one a typmatrix.com , and the Dvorak one at dvortyboards.com/typematrix.html .

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  189. AS/400 KEYBOARD by kcim · · Score: 1

    boy I wish thouse keyboards would work on my pc built like a tank. 24 function keys, etc. actuly the keyboard was for the terminal connected through twinax but I diegress so big a keyboard you could almost surf with it :) by the way I have an 9402 (48 bit) the dedicated service tools menu password is 22222222 (default) but the main password i cant get past I realy have no clue on this machine but I like the keyboard

  190. Also sales had a say by hayden · · Score: 1

    The letters in typewriter are all in the top row so that the Remington salemen could show the client how fast the typewriter was by typing "typewriter" quickly.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  191. Why not use F2? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    F2 is a much faster rename than dragging your butt through a context menu.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Why not use F2? by belroth · · Score: 1
      F2 is a much faster rename than dragging your butt through a context menu.
      YMMV - ok it's one keystroke v. two ('AppKey','m'), but I have to reach for F2 and my hands are already in position to use the 'AppKey'. So I prefer not to use F2 as it's slower for me. <shrugs>

      The original question was about any use for the key, renaming is only one of many anyway.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  192. Whats a keyboard by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    I'm tapping this out on a telegraph key

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  193. 16 commandments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's where hexadecimal came from.

  194. Angular angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find the 45-degree guardian angels to be gentler and more helpful than the 60-degree angels.

  195. "Hammer bars" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not a bad name, but for a century or so, they have been called typebars by typewriter technicians.

  196. Hammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have been called typebars for over a century. Nevertheless, that's a sensible name for them.

  197. See Jared Diamond's Discover article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with a numeric-IP link, a few posts before this.

  198. Read Jared Diamond's article; not hammers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Jared Diamond's article in Discover looks very believable. It has a numeric-IP link, and IIrc is about 45% down through the postings.

    They're not called "hammers", they're called "typebars".

  199. They're not hammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're typebars.