Slashdot Mirror


Nigerian Scammers Claim Another Victim

A Florida newspaper ran a story yesterday about a local retiree who fell hard for a 419 scam. The story goes into depth on the methods used to play on the target's beliefs and gain his confidence - in this case, the target (who lost $320,000) is still having a hard time accepting that they were thieves. Truly remarkable.

600 comments

  1. It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a voluntary tax on stupidity.

    1. Re:It's not a scam by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's right up there with the lottery.

    2. Re:It's not a scam by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I completely agree. While the scammers should not have tried it to start with, anyone stupid enough to be taken in by something so well documented after being warned by the police deserves to loose anything they put in. Why does nobody ever point out this side of the story? It's always like the victim was an innocent bystander, not a greedy moron.

    3. Re:It's not a scam by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worse even if you believe the first email its obvious that there is a fraud going on... In this case it was some corrupt bank worker wanting to move cash out of a unused bank account.

      Anybody that falls for this is just a thief an served right when they don't get anything.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    4. Re:It's not a scam by neosake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      AFTER ALL, NEVER TRUST SOMEONE WHO CAN'T TAKE OFf HIS CAPS LOCK!!!

      Whoops, was my caps lock button stuck?!

      --
      "When a ball dreams, it dreams it's a frisbee"
    5. Re:It's not a scam by Blublu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The lottery is a tax for people who suck at math.

      --
      meh
    6. Re:It's not a scam by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It always amazes me how accurate the quote about never underestimating stupidity proves to be. A mere five minutes with Google, or for the less technically inclined, call to the local police or news, reveals 90% of these scams. Check with the Better Business Bereau, look in the library news archives, so many ways to debunk snake oil like this. Heck, the old folk living here in Florida used to see these guy on street corners selling tonic.

      This guy probably is a runner up for a Darwin award many times over...

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    7. Re:It's not a scam by Eccles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While the scammers should not have tried it to start with, anyone stupid enough to be taken in by something so well documented after being warned by the police deserves to loose anything they put in.

      What about his wife?

      It's also quite possible his mental state is somewhat deteriorated by age. It doesn't happen to some seniors, but it certainly does to others, and it's very likely they'll still have legal control of their assets for some time while in the deteriorated mental state.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:It's not a scam by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      This guy probably is a runner up for a Darwin award many times over...

      I doubt it, I thought that one of the criteria to be considered for the award was that you had to die first.

    9. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      runner up, meaning that he came close to winning but never quite made it

    10. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, I thought that one of the criteria to be considered for the award was that you had to die first.

      Actually, you only have to remove your ability to reproduce, so through death or... umm... dismemberment :-P

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    11. Re:It's not a scam by Dan+Crash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The guy deserved to get scammed! Stupid people should suffer."

      Ah, the spirit of Christmas on Slashdot.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    12. Re:It's not a scam by Khomar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We should be careful when we attack people like this. Did he make a huge mistake? Yes. Was the mistake a result of caving into greed? Yes. However, millions of Americans are currently putting themselves into similar situations by getting deeper and deeper into debt by taking loans to buy luxury items: a new yacht, a larger house, a fancy new car, etc. The evils of debt and the mounting interest costs is well documented, but it happens time and time again.

      While you may not have fallen victim to this particular scheme, are you certain that you have not fallen victim to the "must-have" commercialization scheme so prevalent (and legal) today? Yes, this was a very stupid mistake, but we are all just as capable of making equally stupid mistakes (an investment in the next Enron perhaps).

      Do not be so quick to judge and save a little room for compassion. If nothing else, think of his wife who has lost so much and may have had little to say in the decision. Consider the difficulties that they will both face in their marriage as they approach their final years in poverty. This is a heartbreaking story. Do not become so cynical that we lose sight of this.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    13. Re:It's not a scam by Comrade+Pikachu · · Score: 1
      Most of us do not have the time, energy, or inclination to keep ourselves informed about all the various ways we can be ripped off. For the scam artists, on the other hand, it's a full-time job.

      I have sympathy for the victims, knowing that everyone has a weakness that can be exploited by the right scam. A 73 year old retiree is more likely to fall for the Nigerian email con than your average Slashdot reader, but otherwise intelligent people have been fooled by magnet therapy, Scientology, televangelism, the Atkins diet, or even the corner used car dealer.

      Avoiding the rip-off artists begins by knowing your own weaknesses.

    14. Re:It's not a scam by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It's right up there with the lottery

      The lottery is occasionally in your favor, when it has gone several weeks without a winner, so the prize is very large. (Yes, that does attract more players, but not enough more to compensate for the larger prize).

      The Nigerian scam is never in your favor. :-)

      There is an interesting case included in income tax caselaw books, where a consortium of Australian investors tried to buy one of each possible combination for such a lottery. Buying tickets turned out to take longer than they thought, so they only got about half what they wanted, but still won most of the prizes, including all the big ones, and so made a nice profit. The case is in the books because there was some question over how to tax this.

      Tax law cases are often a lot more interesting than other cases, because people put a lot more thought into avoiding taxes than they do to most other things. People who would only devote a few minutes to planning a murder will spend weeks trying to figure out how to deduct the cost of the bullets. :-) (This also makes it hard. I've got a B.S. degree in math from Caltech, and never in my life have numbers so confused as they did when we studied partnership taxation in law school)

    15. Re:It's not a scam by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      In general, I agree with you, but you have to consider that many of the people who get taken are eldery retirees. In many cases, these people's mental faculties aren't what they were when they were younger. The elderly are unfortunately often the target of overt scams because of this very fact, and because they often have retirement nest eggs.

      There really needs to be stronger international enforcement on these scams. These scammers deserve to be taken out with extreme prejudice.

    16. Re:It's not a scam by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      That's actually why the police in Nigeria don't particularly care about these scams - first of all, you're doing something illegal anyway (or, you think you are); secondly, you have to be pretty gullible to believe this stuff.

      --Dan

    17. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never heard the Atkins diet was a scam. Does this mean I should go out and put back on the 25 lbs I lost on it over a year ago? Or am I to late? Have I been scammed?









      Or maybe trolled.

    18. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The lottery is occasionally in your favor, when it has gone several weeks without a winner, so the prize is very large.

      Hmm, must some new law of statistics I'm not familiar with.

    19. Re:It's not a scam by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      As the AC pointed out, runner up means nearly died due to stupidity... in this case, just going to a area like Nigeria, to meet with unknown people, who can afford to have armed actors pretending to be guards, to pick up a suitcase with a big target painted on it... I wonder how safe he felt with the big guys with guns guarding the money...

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    20. Re:It's not a scam by segfault7375 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...However, millions of Americans are currently putting themselves into similar situations by getting deeper and deeper into debt by taking loans to buy luxury items: a new yacht, a larger house, a fancy new car, etc...

      But at least with those kinds of debt, you at least have something to show for it (the house, the car, etc..) With this scam, you simply lose the money. At least if you find yourself in great debt, you can sell off the item you bought and cut your losses. Just my $0.02.

    21. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe trolled.

      You may have lost 25lbs, but you're still a fatass ;)

    22. Re:It's not a scam by Tofino · · Score: 1

      Thanks for paying the tax, then. The 1.1 mill my wife won last year came in handy. Long live stupidity!

    23. Re:It's not a scam by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hmm, must some new law of statistics I'm not familiar with.

      If the jackpot is large enough, each ticket bought that week will have an average return higher than the cost of the ticket. However, that fact alone does not make it a good bet, because the variance overwhelms the positive expectation.

    24. Re:It's not a scam by garcia · · Score: 1

      $1 is a lot less money than $320k.

      While I am certainly in aggreement that playing to lotto is pointless it is certainly no where near the "scam level" as the Nigerian scam.

    25. Re:It's not a scam by letchhausen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "...your average Slashdot reader"

      Yeah, those geniuses in Silicon Valley and Seattle who put up their stock options against their mortgages till the drop in 2000 and had to face foreclosure, or the slick characters who poured their hopes and dreams into the money making machine known as the internet only to come up with severance if they were lucky. Those guys are so smart, the ones who have downsized into tiny apartments from expensive condos and are playing 2-year old games while living off unemployment extensions. The ones with the "What Me Worry?" looks on their faces. Yeah, they'd never get scammed......

      --
      Hey, you think your house is cool?
    26. Re:It's not a scam by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people _love_ to prattle on about how everyone else is _soo_ stupid for playing the lottery.

      The real truth is that it can (rarely) make statistical sense, as you say. And moreoever, you're better off spending $20 a month on something halfway entertaining and with a (close to zero, but nonzero) chance of changing your life than you are e.g. spedning $20 on big macs at McDonalds.

    27. Re:It's not a scam by stonecypher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The lottery is occasionally in your favor

      Statistics are funny. Even if it's in your favor, you're still not going to land the sum, so it's still not worth it - unless you're willing to risk a huge amount of money.

      As the old saying goes - a variation on what this was started by - the lottery is a tax on those which are bad at math.

      I see the 419 scam as a form of social darwinism.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    28. Re:It's not a scam by stonecypher · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and the next time the police come to you and say "this is a scam, don't trust these people you've never seen from the other side of the planet", and you proceed to pump in a third of a million dollars, taking out sixteen credit cards, selling two cars and double mortgaging your home, we'll be laughing at you, too.

      Similarly, do not attempt to generate electricity by holding up a lightning rod in a storm, and do not attempt to seem commercially productive by suing for decade-past code publicly authored by someone else.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    29. Re:It's not a scam by eric76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It may still be a pretty good deal.

      The real question is not the numerical amount of the winnings compared to the bet, but the value of the money in what you can do with it.

      For example, assume the ticket costs $1 and the payout to a single winner is $25,000,000.

      What is the real value of that $1 to you? Probably not a whole lot. It's not even a hamburger. Maybe a small coke.

      That $1 is just not going to make much difference in your life.

      How about $25,000,000? That can make a huge difference in your life. Even adjusting for present value and taking out taxes, you can probably still retire, open your own medium size business, pay off your bookie, ... .

      So the real value of $25,000,000 in terms of what it can potentially do for you may be much more than the strict odds on the gamble.

      But considering how most people who win seem to blow the money, the value to them may be much less than would be expected.

    30. Re:It's not a scam by ornil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Taxes go to the government. They are not completely wasted. So I disagree.

    31. Re:It's not a scam by schon · · Score: 1

      his is a heartbreaking story

      And they have nobody to blame but themselves.

      I'm sorry, but I honestly can't bring myself to feel sorry for someone who got scammed via the most well-known ploy on the planet, and then refuses to believe he was scammed.

    32. Re:It's not a scam by Amtiskaw · · Score: 1

      It's evolution, baby!

    33. Re:It's not a scam by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Funny

      And I woudln't even say it's always deterioration which causes an inability to see through this kind of thing. In my experience at least, a lot of older people get stuck in the worldview of whatever decade they were in at around their twenties or thirties. Even if they wind up with a computer in their homes, it dosn't become the same thing in their minds as it does to us. It's just a strange magic box which might as well be powered by dragon horns for all they understand of it. If their magic box says a nigerian wants to give them millions of dollors, it's no more stange than the fact that they're able to get letters through their phone line in the first place.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    34. Re:It's not a scam by stonecypher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, millions of Americans are currently putting themselves into similar situations by getting deeper and deeper into debt by taking loans to buy luxury items: a new yacht, a larger house, a fancy new car, etc. The evils of debt and the mounting interest costs is well documented, but it happens time and time again.

      We're not laughing at this dumbass for getting into debt. We're laughing at him for spending three times his monetary worth on something that police had already told him was fake.

      While you may not have fallen victim to this particular scheme, are you certain that you have not fallen victim to the "must-have" commercialization scheme so prevalent (and legal) today?

      Not to the tune of a third of a million dollars, not once the police had told me not to, and certainly not to sixteen credit cards, two sold cars and a doubly mortgaged house.

      I do feel a bit dumb about my $50 electric razor. That's maybe a different caliber of dumb.

      but we are all just as capable of making equally stupid mistakes (an investment in the next Enron perhaps).

      Did the police tell you not to invest in Enron? Did you hear about Enron via email? Did you invest triple the amount of money you actually had, risking corporate funds loaned to you, on Enron?

      If nothing else, think of his wife who has lost so much and may have had little to say in the decision.

      I'm not laughing at her. I feel awful for her.

      This is a heartbreaking story. Do not become so cynical that we lose sight of this.

      Heartbreaking, yes. Uproariously funny, yes. I wouldn't think it was funny if he hadn't been specifically told by the fucking authorities.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    35. Re:It's not a scam by jejones · · Score: 2, Funny

      I used to think that as a rational utilitarian hedonist it made sense to buy a lottery ticket when the expected value became positive...but then I realized I was overlooking opportunity costs.

    36. Re:It's not a scam by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      This guy probably is a runner up for a Darwin award many times over...

      Well, except for not having died, and all. The Darwin Award is for having spared the gene pool their taint, which he has not.

      He's also not eligible for a Grammy.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    37. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As somebody's sig says, "just think of it as evolution in action."

    38. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And moreoever, you're better off spending $20 a month on something halfway entertaining and with a (close to zero, but nonzero) chance of changing your life than you are e.g. spedning $20 on big macs at

      Actually, the cholesterol has a better than zero chance of "changing" your life.

    39. Re:It's not a scam by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hmm, must some new law of statistics I'm not familiar with

      Uhm...you aren't familiar with the formula

      Expected payoff = probability of winning * prize if you win
      ?

      You should have got this in the first week of your first statistics course. :-)

      Or maybe you aren't familiar with how lottery prizes work? If no one wins, the prize gets added to the next lottery.

      The probability of a given ticket winning is the same each week, but the prize goes up. However, more people tend to play as the prize goes up, so the chances of sharing the prize go up, but the net effect is the "prize if you win" term goes up each week.

      If a lottery goes a few weeks without a winner, this can push the expected payoff higher than the price of a ticket.

    40. Re:It's not a scam by cyb3r0ptx · · Score: 1

      Looks like the stupid people are loose on Slashdot. Or is that "lose"?

    41. Re:It's not a scam by xinit · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's not just that the guy is stupid either... Anyone who's taken in by these schemes has to realize that they're doing something illegal if they're helping someone effectively "steal" millions of dollars.

      They're Criminally Stupid.

      --
      --- http://foo.ca
    42. Re:It's not a scam by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      It's right up there with the lottery.

      Lotteries are simply a tax on working people - you might as well throw a few bucks at it to have a chance of recovering your unvolunteered tax money.

      Too many times have I stood in line at some quikstop while the person in front of me cashes a government-subsistence check and then proceeds to buy cigarettes and lottery tickets ... here I am paying for their bad habits without getting to enjoy any of 'em myself.

      Meanwhile, on topic, I know someone that has fallen for this very scam - an old retired person that will never recover from his stupidity. Unfortunately, it becomes his family's problem to care for him now - scams (and lotteries - redundant I s'pose) affect much more than just the person losing the money.

    43. Re:It's not a scam by plalonde2 · · Score: 1
      The thing that makes lotteries tick, even though the expected value is less than you put in, is that money isn't really linear in terms of its value for amount.

      The dollar you spend for a ticket has some value, but the million dollar prize has *much* more value to most people than a million one dollar expenses. The individual dollars won't change your lifestyle, whereas the big pay-out will.

      Lotteries make more sense if you think of them dollar-sized fantasy packs...Or as a friend used to say "I knew I was an adult when I started buying lottery tickets instead of porn. The fantasies were better, and more likely."

    44. Re:It's not a scam by hexx · · Score: 1

      The problem with this (and I agree, he's an idiot and deserved it) is that he took out credit cards and borrowed money. Now, what do you think happens when he is unable to pay that money?

      Well, his debt holders sell off the debt and raise their interest rates for everyone else in order to cover their loss. And this happens every time anyone negs on a debt. It hurts everyone else.

      And, I can tell you that because he lives in Florida, they cannot seize his home (as a primary residence) under *any* debtor circumstances. So he's not worse off. We are. You and I are covering his fucking stupidity with our paychecks.

      So, this guy should be thrown in jail, because he (and of course, it's really that there are many people like him) is causing my interest rates to rise. And because he is an idiot.

      And if I knew his address, I'd go torch his 1967 Cadillac.

    45. Re:It's not a scam by graffix_jones · · Score: 1

      "...a consortium of Australian investors tried to buy one of each possible combination for such a lottery... ...they only got about half what they wanted, but still won most of the prizes, including all the big ones..."

      This reminds me of Laslo, the guy who lives in Val Kilmer's closet in the movie "Real Genius"...

    46. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Girlfriend's grandparents won the lottery a few years back and yes it was the jackpot.

    47. Re:It's not a scam by jmv · · Score: 1

      OK, so where do you draw the line? Did anyone who lost money by buying e.g. Enron stocks, deserve it because it was a stupid move? Or maybe those who thought LNUX at $300 was still a good deal?

    48. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody arguing that the lottery sometimes is or is not in your favor is overlooking two very important things - 1) chances are good that another person will also win (on the really big ones), so your potential take is halved (or worse); 2) Taxes are going to cliam a large portion of your take.

      So the lottery is a tax on people who are bad at math, and people who forget to look beyond the math :)

    49. Re:It's not a scam by DrCode · · Score: 1
      we are all just as capable of making equally stupid mistakes

      Yes, I blew $100 on the Windows98 upgrade thinking it would fix things, and that was only a couple years after buying Windows95 with the same hope.

    50. Re:It's not a scam by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      We should be careful when we attack people like this. Did he make a huge mistake? Yes. Was the mistake a result of caving into greed? Yes. However, millions of Americans are currently putting themselves into similar situations by getting deeper and deeper into debt by taking loans to buy luxury items: a new yacht, a larger house, a fancy new car, etc. The evils of debt and the mounting interest costs is well documented, but it happens time and time again.

      While you may not have fallen victim to this particular scheme, are you certain that you have not fallen victim to the "must-have" commercialization scheme so prevalent (and legal) today? Yes, this was a very stupid mistake, but we are all just as capable of making equally stupid mistakes (an investment in the next Enron perhaps).

      Do not be so quick to judge and save a little room for compassion. If nothing else, think of his wife who has lost so much and may have had little to say in the decision. Consider the difficulties that they will both face in their marriage as they approach their final years in poverty. This is a heartbreaking story. Do not become so cynical that we lose sight of this.

      Very true, also another thought that come to me is, this guys stupidity and gullibility are extreme, and well, I cannot help wondering done this poor old chap, suffer from dementia? And well it doesn't sit well with me to say as the great-grandparent post said, that stupidity deserves punishment. Um like do we punish, being born without legs, or loosing your legs in a car crash, ok this guy is stupid an he brought it on himself. So most of us bring a certain amount of grief on ourselves in life, those who are more vulnerable should be protected, not left to be preyed upon.
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    51. Re:It's not a scam by cehardin · · Score: 1

      Reading your post got me sidetracked.

      Have you noticed how the interest rates on cards are SUPPOSED to be tied to the prime rate,...yet the interest rates they offer have been the same for many, many years, even though the prime rate has fallen dramatically?

      The prime rate has fallen about 5% in the past 3 years of so, but for the most part the interest rates on credit cards are the same as they where back then.

    52. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      well turn that 20 into "100" and thats how much i spend on cigarettes every month. with a gurantee of changing your life. but it also gives some level of 'entertainment' and distraction factor (work smoke break++)

      yet i still complain at people buying lottery tickets for throwing their money away

    53. Re:It's not a scam by slamb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We should be careful when we attack people like this. Did he make a huge mistake? Yes. Was the mistake a result of caving into greed? Yes. However, millions of Americans are currently putting themselves into similar situations by getting deeper and deeper into debt by taking loans to buy luxury items: a new yacht, a larger house, a fancy new car, etc. The evils of debt and the mounting interest costs is well documented, but it happens time and time again.

      That's not true at all. People get themselves into holes with loans, yes. But it's not a similar situation. Nigerian spammers essentially say "I stole a lot of money and I'll give you a cut if you help me smuggle it out of the country." The original premise in these emails is always that it's money the guy has acquired through questionable means, thus the need to launder it through an American. In this case, the guy claimed to work for a bank and to have stolen the money from the account of some dead German guy. (Was it his? No. Is it his now? Yes. Was it a gift? No. Thus, stealing. It's not rocket science.)

      I'm tired of everyone saying the people who get scammed are innocent but stupid. They may be stupid, but they're not innocent. They all knew something shady was going on; they just didn't realize it was at their expense.

      So for that reason, the people who just get themselves into debt are in a totally different situation. They were irresponsible and screwed themselves over, yes. But they didn't do it in the name of stealing money from someone else.

    54. Re:It's not a scam by bitmason · · Score: 1

      There's a "rational" argument for playing the lottery even if the expected value based on absolute dollar and cents is negative. Standard expected value analyses assume that a dollar is always worth the same dollar no matter the circumstances. In fact, there's an economic argument based on utlity value of money (if I remember my terms right) that the true value of a dollar (to a given person) is not constant.

      Thus, as others have commented in a more anecdotal way, $5 per week, say, may be invisible to someone in a certain income bracket while a life-changing lottery winning is not. The utility value of the $5 is essentially zero; the utility value of a life-changing win is more than the sum of the dollars involved.

      Now, obviously, there's also a rather large multiplier involved even if the utility value of the money spent is "essentially zero." But it's one way of looking at it. BTW, it's pretty clear that this argument does not apply to more modest $50 or $100 prizes. These are expected value-negative however you figure them. The only argument in these cases is an entertainment one.

    55. Re:It's not a scam by Ismenio · · Score: 1

      This post really deserves the "Insightful" tag, from my point of view. Not so much for the comments on the story itself but because of the remarks regarding the "must-have" society in which we live in. Well put! --------- A little story I have on this :) I got two e-mails for this scam and I decided to "play" with them a little. Nothing sophisticated but I was a little borred, to I tried it anyway: I replied to the 1st guy but temporarily changed by e-mail settings to that the "reply-to" field was pointing to the 2nd guy. I did the same for the first guy ;) I didn't get any more messages from them, which may mean that either they got my little trick -or- if they quickly simply pressed the reply buttom, one replied to the other :))) Ismenio

    56. Re:It's not a scam by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Adding to your comment (and ignoring the dumbass AC who replied) I have noticed the rate spread banks charge has gone up too. This is the % difference between what they pay for saving accounts, and what they charge for home loans. It used to be 4%, but is closer to 6% now.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    57. Re:It's not a scam by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The lottery doesn't lie to you.
      They make some people (other than themselves) rich.
      They take few from many to give a lot to few, where sammers take a lot from few.

      Apart from these differences, it is the same.

    58. Re:It's not a scam by dustman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about your grandparents, but mine aren't mentally retarded.

      While it's own thing to say "my grandma doesn't know jack about how computers work", and even joke about it, saying they consider it a "magic box" powered by dragons.

      But, if my grandmother is using email, I don't think she says "oh, my magic box is telling me to send my bank info over"... She understands the concept of mail, and letters.

      Computers and technology had very little to do with this. Maybe sometimes people don't understand the danger of giving out their bank account and identification information, but that's a little different.

      (All this being said, my grandmother might fall for this con. But that's because she's into get-rich-quick schemes (she's owned vending machines, tried "telemarket from home" schemes, raised emus in her back yard(!), etc), not because she's an idiot fooled by the "magic box powered by psychic fairies")

    59. Re:It's not a scam by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I do feel a bit dumb about my $50 electric razor. That's maybe a different caliber of dumb.

      You know.... I personaly would never call someone dumb for buying a $50.00 electric razor.

      It's been a while since I priced razor blades, due to the fact that I have a happening $50.00 electric razor, and my safty razor needs are currently accomplished by the free "mach 3"s I get in the mail on a regular basis. My last one has been in use for about 3 years. If I was going with a mach 3... I believe $15.00 per 12 count box is a good deal.. so roughly 1.25 each. Assuming you throw them out weekly that's $65 a year. I'm actually not a hairy guy... so it's more like 2 weeks for me... so $40.00 a year on mach3s

      $50.00 for 3 years of shaving enjoyment, and once and a while with a free mach 3 turbo if I feel the need to look extra spiffy isn't dumb at all, it's actually pretty damn cost effective.

      Plus the bonus if i'm late, I can shave while in rush hour traffic... it's not like I need to pay attention to the road or anything.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    60. Re:It's not a scam by Microsofts+slave · · Score: 1

      Its a wonder that a person this gullible ever even accumulated a $250000 nest egg anyhow. I wonder how this man has survived life for so long, without being tricked into jumping off a cliff for 15 bucks with the chance of getting 12.7 millon if he lives.

      --

      Tragek

    61. Re:It's not a scam by Clinoti · · Score: 1
      I agree but instead of posting a dissertation; I'm just going to let this posting point to my sig. :)

      --

      Let's keep in mind that patents are in place to keep lawyers employed and keep them litigating. -CatGrep

    62. Re:It's not a scam by Notrace · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      Brings up something that came along a long while ago.
      I do think, and this case seems to prove that point, and I'm NOT being complacent, that the internet however cool it is, IS a dangerous place or so it seems.
      A lot of controls, alerts, ... that are available in the real world just are not there on the Net. And a lot of, let's call 'em stupid for now, people really have no business being on the Net.

      Anyway, there was a discussion a while ago about requiring people to have a kind of Net-license, and you could only obtain it after passing some exams or showing that you have the required mindset/skills ...

      As far as I can remember, the discussion actually was more about requiring that people would know how to install a decent virus-scanner, that people would know how to run a safe computer.
      And it was actually more about protecting the rest of the net.
      But I do tend to, I do start to believe that a lot of people should be protected against themselves.
      This is such an obvious case.

      And yes, I do know it's not democratic.
      But this is a very high price to pay.

      I am pushing my ideas to the extreme maybe, ... just maybe.
      Being devils advocate maybe.
      But then again ...

    63. Re:It's not a scam by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't call it dumb either. My first razor was a Braun electric that I got for $60 in high school. I didn't have to replace it until almost three years ago, which means I used it for about 11 years. I used the same blades and foil the whole time too, so that works out to $5.45 per year for shaving, plus electricity. A lot cheaper than disposables.

      For my new one, I got a $125 Braun that comes with a cleaning/recharging base; it's nearly three years old and still works like new. I expect it to last at least 11 years.

      Buying expensive stuff isn't dumb if it saves you money in the long term.

    64. Re:It's not a scam by schon · · Score: 1

      What is the real value of that $1 to you? Probably not a whole lot. It's not even a hamburger. Maybe a small coke.

      Funny story - I used to carpool with a guy who's nickname was "Prozak" (because he was always "happy", even when it was apparent that he wasn't.) One day, I ask Prozak to pick me up at the 7-11 near my place, instead of from my house.. he asks why, and I tell him "I wanna buy a lottery ticket."

      He goes off on a rant about how big of a waste of money it was, and how I should be saving my money, or investing it, blah blah blah.

      So I tell him "Look, it's $1. I can either use it to buy a chocolate bar, or I can buy a lottery ticket... know what? since I have two dollars, I think I'll buy a lottery ticket AND a chocolate bar."

      The really funny thing about it was - he kept trying to sell me Amway.

    65. Re:It's not a scam by mraymer · · Score: 1
      Please learn the difference between "loose" and "lose" before you slam the ignorance of others.

      I am sure the person that fell for this scam was your better (and mine) in at least some way. Granted, you and I would never fall for a 419, but perhaps this retired "electronics specialist" would laugh himself silly if he saw you trying to wire your own home, or perform some of the tasks he did daily at his job.

      Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, "Every man I meet is in some way my superior, and I can learn from him."

      If that was true for Emerson, is it not exponentially more true for you and I?

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    66. Re:It's not a scam by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      This is a serious question.

      Are you aware that you just called your wife stupid?

    67. Re:It's not a scam by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That ignores the utility value of money, which acts as a coefficient to the payoff, rises and falls in a non-linear way, and reacts differently for loss than for gain.

      Utility theory is also why it taxing 10% of a blue collar worker's income hurts more than taxing 50% of Bill Gates'. There's a vast difference in value between the utility of 10,000 dollars and 9,000 dollars (it may be the difference between paying rent and not having a home) and less of a relative gulf in utility between 20 billion and 40 billion dollars.

    68. Re:It's not a scam by jesser · · Score: 1

      Plus the bonus if i'm late, I can shave while in rush hour traffic... it's not like I need to pay attention to the road or anything.

      I regularly read Slashdot while shaving in the morning. I use a Norelco. The battery has died, so I have to use it plugged in.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    69. Re:It's not a scam by Roblimo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have the wrong credit card, my friend. The one I use for travel expenses (BofA Visa) is prime + 2%.

      And any wage earner and/or homeowner who's not totally buried in debt gets constant offers of 0% "introductory offer" credit cards where the introductory rate last 6 months or more. If you have a card or two with high interest, get one of those and transfer the balance *with this caveat*: If you are even one day late on one of those special offer deals, you will suddenly stop paying interest and start paying what used to be called "vigorish" back when the government still regulated financial institutions. To me 22% or 24% interest is nothing but loansharking, even if it's done by a a supposedly resepctable bank or other financial firm.

      If that happens to you, your best option (if you're not so buried that you should seek help from one of the credit counseling agencies that make deals with creditors for you) is to get another low-interest card or two... and watch yourself from then on.

      Of course, if you're really deep in debt, you can always answer one of those friendly Nigerian emails. $20 million or $30 million ought to help you get a fresh financial start, right?

      - Robin

    70. Re:It's not a scam by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Yeah, total agreement here on the electric razor.

      My first one worked perfectly when it was replaced after about 7 years (it was stolen.)

      I'm still on the second one. I got it in 1995. I've never had to crack the case to change the batteries, and it's still on the original blades.

    71. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not cynicism! Ask any con artist; the con always depends on a little larceny in the heart of the mark. This man thought he was going to get $21.5 million dollars from the accouint of a man who died. Wsa he entitled to it? NO. Were his "benefactors" entitled to it? NO. They were obviously pulling a fast one on someone.

      I am most disapointed to hear he was a "retired electronics specialist". You would have thought he had more sense!

    72. Re:It's not a scam by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 2, Informative
      And I beg to differ. He supposedly gave a mortgage on his home. In the state of Florida the mortgagee can and will foreclose on the home and the elderly gentleman most definitely will be evicted and lose his home.

      While it's true that standard credit debts cannot force the sale of your primary residence, they instead acquire a judgement lien against your estate, a mortgage can and will be foreclosed upon no matter what the circumstances are.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    73. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you may not have fallen victim to this particular scheme, are you certain that you have not fallen victim to the "must-have" commercialization scheme so prevalent (and legal) today?

      I ordered a part from an electronics supplier. The part was cheap but the shipping was about $6. I then later found that I could buy the same part from RadioShack (if you can believe that!) for a few dimes more but the shipping was $2.50.

      I didn't want to watch time go by the time I ordered it, even though I had shopped around.

      I guess I fell for the must-have commericialization scheme from the original electronics supplier. Now, I know better to cower in fear from purchases and have vowed to live my life in misery and never purchase anything.

    74. Re:It's not a scam by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      At least with lottery there's a chance you'll get something back. Even if it's a 0.000001% chance, that's still a chance. Scams are, by definition, 0% payout. Last time I checked, 0*anything equals 0.

    75. Re:It's not a scam by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are folks who put together enough money to buy tickets for every possible number. In Lotteries where this is allowed, they wait until doing this will yield a profitable prize. In these cases, they *are* going to win. The risk they take is that they will be the only winner.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    76. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, how many people can say they have a similar coffee table and carved wooden elephant ... and antelope!

    77. Re:It's not a scam by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      If Congress would just make falling the 419 scam a felony, then the poor guy wouldn't have to worry about keeping his house.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    78. Re:It's not a scam by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should sell his story to Follywood. I bet plenty of people would pay to see "Falling Down II."

    79. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *am* a very hairy guy.
      I went with the beard thing. Saved more that way than
      with *any* razor solution.

      These days I shave. But I use a straight razor.
      Disposable razors are inadequate for me. And NONE of the
      electric razors work worth a damn for me. Well, I take
      that back -- I have a Wahl professional clipper, which
      costs about $140 retail. I'll use it if I need to
      go from full-beard to "shavable", say after a month or two
      in the woods.

      Brauns and Norelcos and Remingtons don't really work
      at all for some guys. And they sure as hell don't last
      3-5 years or more for us. A straight razor, on the other
      hand, can be passed down to the next generation. And t
      the big surface area makes for more comfort than you'll
      ever get from a little razor blade.

    80. Re:It's not a scam by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I don't feel sorry at all for the guy.

      Nor do I feel sorry for people who lost their money by buying every share of Pets.com they could find in 1999. Or those who bought junk bonds in the 80s.

      Yes, you're feeling horrible and you've lost everything. But those weren't tears in your eyes when you agreed to put your money there; they were dollar signs.

      The way to become rich is not through greed; greed is counter-productive.

      Bulls and bears make money, but pigs become bacon.

    81. Re:It's not a scam by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Inheritance?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    82. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence "runner-up."

    83. Re:It's not a scam by eric76 · · Score: 1

      Did you tell him the lottery ticket is a better gamble than the chocolate bar?

    84. Re:It's not a scam by NoCleverName · · Score: 1

      I thought the old saying was "the odds of winning the lottery are the same whether you play it or not".

    85. Re:It's not a scam by TexVex · · Score: 1
      ...(if you're not so buried that you should seek help from one of the credit counseling agencies that make deals with creditors for you)...
      If you are so buried that you think you need one of those scammers to help you out, declare bankruptcy. It will be cheaper to do so and will clean up your credit faster.
      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    86. Re:It's not a scam by Lonath · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok, I'm bored, so here's how I figure out when to play the lottery. First the main principle is that of the "progressive jackpot". That means that people play some game and if nobody wins, a pot grows and grows. Normally when playing poker or something with a progressive jackpot, you can't just sit down halfway through and start playing because you didn't put any money into the game. The lottery OTOH lets you start playing after many people have put their money in and lost. I think this is the same idea behind those teams that beat video poker by waiting for a huge jackpot, then playing all of the machines for days until they win the jackpot.

      If the lottery gives you a 1/N chance of winning the big prize per dollar ticket, and the jackpot is about 3N, then the tickets start getting worth it. Start with the 3N. First, they take away about 40 percent of the money if you pick the "lump sum" (you should consider this important since you pay for the tickets now and don't get to pay for your tickets over 25 years...), then you have taxes which will be about 40 percent of what's left, so you're looking at .6*.6 of the money, which is 36 percent, or roughly 1/3 of the total (About N dollars). Then you have the problem of if there's a 1/N chance of winning and 2N tickets are bought for that drawing, you will average 2 winners, and it could be more, but it could be less, so your real expected payoff is more like P(1 winner)*.36(Jackpot = J) + P(2 winners)*(.36(J)/2) + P(3 winners)*(.36(J)/3)...and so forth. It's a binomial distribution with p = 1/N, q = ((N-1)/N), so your P(X = 0) is ((N-1)/N)^2N, P(X=1) = C(2N,1)(1/N)((N-1)/N)^(2N-1), P(X=2) = C(2N,2)(1/N)^2((N-1)/N)^(2N-2).... All of the ((N-1)/N) terms are roughly the same and we can call them K, and we can simplify the combinations (By assuming that C(2N,P) is roughly (2N)^P/P!) for large N and small P to get

      P(X=P) = C(2N,P)(1/N)^P((N-1)/N)^P which is approx

      (2^P)(N^P)/P!(1/N)^P(K) = (2^P)/P!(K), and the K is essentially constant over all P, so we can ignore it, so the P(X=P) is proportional to (2^P)/P!.

      I will ignore the 0 winners case, since then you get a chance to play again next week, But the constants for the other numbers are : C1 = 2, C2 = 4/2 = 2, C3 = 8/6 = 4/3, C4 = 16/24 = 2/3, C5 = 32/120 ~= 1/4, C6 = 64/720 ~= 1/12, and it keeps going down.

      Add those numbers up and make the last one a 1/10 or so to take care of the other numbers, and you see that the total is about 6.5 or 7. You have essentially a 2/7 chance of being the sole winner, a 2/7 chance of being a half winner, and so on, so your real expected value will look more like

      (2*J+2*(J/2)+(4/3)*(J/3)+(2/3)*(J/4)+(1/4)*(J/5) +( 1/10)*(J/6)...)/7

      which is approx ((2+1+4/9+1/6+1/20...)/7)*J ~= (1/2)*J, so you're looking at about half the jackpot being yours (ignoring the 0 winner case which lowers it even more to about .4.

      So, on top of the taxes and persent value which eat away about 2/3 of the value of the jackpot, the other winners make your jackpot about half or less of its value beyond that, so we're looking at about a 15-18 percent return on the actual "dollar value" of the jackpot. I tend to play when the jackpot is 3N where the chance of winning is 1/N, since I like poker and this situation only comes up every few years, but to take everything into account, you should wait until the jackpot is about 6N,. The only problem is that I was assuming 2N tickets bought for the current drawing, and if those numbers go way up, then the expected size of the jackpot keeps going down due to more players. So, I guess it will never be perfect, but it's nice to have better odds if you're going to play and the little prizes increase the expected value, as well, so it might be worth playing once in a while. And no I never won except for the little stuff.

    87. Re:It's not a scam by numark · · Score: 1

      There are those of us who use the lottery for its intended purpose: as a cheap form of entertainment. I fully understand the math behind the lottery, and I know that in my lifetime I'll be struck by lightning more likely than win the lottery. However, a buck now and then for a scratcher or the Lotto isn't a bad deal. As long as you don't go into compulsive gambling and spend money you don't have or can't afford, the lottery can be just a little bit of harmless fun.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    88. Re:It's not a scam by cehardin · · Score: 1

      Well, actually I too have a low interest rate credit card. I actually use my AMEX 99% of the time instead of visa or MC.

      I was just pointing out a trend I've seen.

    89. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Having read the article, I'd say his mental state was somewhate deteriorated by Christianity.

    90. Re:It's not a scam by Qacker · · Score: 1

      I don't think that example works very well. A lawyer knows all about the the law but still wouldn't be fooled by a 419 type scam. A plumber wouldn't be fooled either. Stupidity in one form or another seems to be non discrimenatory.

      --
      Learn lisp today!
    91. Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      The problem with the lottery is not people buying tickets... instead it is buying TOO MUCH... if you only buy a ticket once in a while, it's nothing. But if you spend thousands of dollars each year (like many "addicts" do), it is undesirable...

      Like all things in life, moderation...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    92. Re:It's not a scam by Vlad2000 · · Score: 1

      While in many cases the odds of a lottery may be against you, it still can make sense to buy a ticket because of opportunity cost.

      What the hell else are you going to get with that $1. Buy gum, candy, or even worse, cigarettes which are almost guaranteed in the long run to cause cancer which is expensive to cure.

      In short, if you are going to spend your lottery money on something that in few days will guaranteed to be worthless or like cigarettes, which will cost you money in the long run, then it makes perfect economic sense to buy a lottery ticket since it at least has the possibility of getting you big bucks.

    93. Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      That's capitalism. I don't know what your problem is. If you support capitalism (I don't but you probably do), your argument is worth nothing. If we follow your reasoning, people who default on any debt should be thrown in jail too. After all, interest rates are higher than they should be because of expected risk of default. And people whose house burns down should be sent to jail too. I mean, your insurance is higher than it should be because of a few extra fires.

      What sort of idiotic reasoning is that? Your SELFISH impulses are making you behave irrationally. People have the RIGHT to do whatever they want. There are currency traders who purposely crash a country's currency in order to profit from it. That's ok. So why isn't this?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    94. Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This message isn't necessarily directed at you...

      I'm tired of everyone saying the people who get scammed are innocent but stupid. They may be stupid, but they're not innocent. They all knew something shady was going on; they just didn't realize it was at their expense.

      All of you on Slashdot dissing this old person should be ashamed of yourselves. Most of you are laughing now but wait until something like this happens to you. You people don't realize that these are sophisticated operations. It isn't just an e-mail and that's that. Did you even read the article? If people can fly you around the world, set up fake guards, metal cases filled with cash, etc, it is SO EASY for someone to fall for that. None of you have any idea how sophisticated scammers are.

      It's just too bad you guys attribute all this to stupidity (what the hell is stupidity anyway? Are you stupid for falling to George "Warmonger" Bush's lies of WMD in Iraq?). Until you guys get defrauded on a car you buy, or a house you buy, or a vacation, or whatever, you are all living in your glass houses throwing stones at the victims.

      (No, I haven't lost any money on anything like this. But I just feel sad and angry at the hostility directed by the Slashdot crowd towards the victim. It isn' that surprising to me though. Most people here are conservatives and quite clueless on these issues, not to mention heartless :( )

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    95. Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      That's not why... The reason cops in Nigeria probably don't care is because this is the 3rd largest industry in Nigeria (according to the article). This must mean that there are thousands of people employed in the business. It's very hard for the goverment to crack down on something that the people live off of... kind of like how the Afghan government does almost nothing to poppy production because the people will starve if they shut them down (unless the UN or USA/EU compensates them)... or how prostitution (including underage girls) is so rampant in some parts of Southeast Asia and no one does anything because it is a big industry employing tens of thousands of people, with many trickle-down benefits...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    96. Re:It's not a scam by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Wahl professional clipper, which
      costs about $140 retail.


      I also have one of those... I first had the pet trimmer model as they don't retail for $140 but are exactly the same thing. I lent it to a friend, who was nice enough to use vegatable oil to lubercate, as he was more hairy then my self and needed serious cutage. Needless to say the vegi oil killed it. The replacement was a true human wahl with the extra heads as well as the sliding hair depth gadge. I have those streches of time when I don't have to deal with humans where I just don't shave. I'd say two days without shaving for me is like a 6 0'clock shadow for most people, but never the less, I break out the Wahl after a week without shaving. Otherwise, it's just to get rid of my head hair below the ears.

      Brauns and Norelcos and Remingtons don't really work
      at all for some guys. And they sure as hell don't last
      3-5 years or more for us.


      I totally understand. I found the Braun worked best for me, infact I've had two. One an older one needs a new screen, and I haven't bothered hunting around the net for one. In the past I got them from jc pennies. I went with a Norelco just because the local drug store carries the parts. I must say that the Braun seems to work better on fine hair then my the Norelco.

      While I had good luck with Braun, there was a cheeper brand that looked attractive to me because it was a wet / dry. But because I push the head close to my face to get a close shave, the metal would crack. Still, I think the more hairy people might get away with using a wahl first, followed by a Norelco.

      It actually makes me happy i'm not all that hairy.

      But I use a straight razor.
      Disposable razors are inadequate for me


      I've always wanted to get into a straight razor actually at least for my major face parts. I'd feel uncomfortable with it tward my neck and jaw line.

      What I really enjoyed rather then a physical blade were those replacable razors, as in you unscrew the bottom shaft and the head opens up and you pop in a razor. But for the life of me, I can't find those local. It's much easier finding disposable safty heads for your generic style or your current latest super duper models (Sensor / Mach 3).

      What I find most annoying is there was an older model disposable head razor I had.. Atra perhaps it was called, but costco doesn't carry anything but Sensor or mach 3 heads. Dual blade with soap strip. I was pretty happy with the cost / peformance ratio.

      Worst was something I think it was called wreckless sword, or something similar.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    97. Re:It's not a scam by cduffy · · Score: 1

      If people can fly you around the world, set up fake guards, metal cases filled with cash, etc, it is SO EASY for someone to fall for that. None of you have any idea how sophisticated scammers are.

      If one is willing to suspend sense in favor of appearances, certainly.

      I've been a victim of fraud -- to the tune of about $5000, granted a much smaller scale. Stupidity on my part not to recognize it and back out sooner, yes -- but not even nearly as much stupidity as this fellow here exhibited. Since when did the presence of guards, chemists, etc. make a scenario which has long been running as a high-dollar scam into something which an individual can reasonably take part in without an expectation of getting ripped off? If I walk into a bank which I believe to be a branch of a legitimate and well-known organization and a man whom I believe to be a legitimate representative of said organization offers me a deal that's too good to be true, I have a responsibility to myself and to those whom I care for to recognize it as too good to be true, and carefully consider the risks involved, despite the apparent legitimacy of the individual who may be making the offer. Those who don't do that -- who accept the apparent authority of those who would pull the wool over their eyes -- are idiots, and I have no compunctions with saying so directly.

      Most people here are conservatives and quite clueless on these issues, not to mention heartless.

      If by "clueless" you mean presuming that the scammers are indeed running an operation which appears (based on appearances alone, without critical thinking or reasearch applied) to be a scam, absolutely not. As for "heartless" -- damn straight. I may have a heart, on occasion -- but I prefer to do my thinking with my head, particularly when my finances are at stake.

    98. Re:It's not a scam by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Australians don't pay tax on lotteries.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    99. Re:It's not a scam by vladb · · Score: 1

      What an idiot. But who'd blame him? The guy is out of his wits at the ripe old age.. I mean, every sign was there that this was a phony deal, the guy got warned a number of times to not go through with the whole thing. Yet he did and still insists he's done the right thing! Christ! this is sick. It is painful to read the article, let alone live through this or be a party to the fraud.

    100. Re:It's not a scam by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      $50.00 for 3 years of shaving enjoyment

      You and I clearly own different electric razors.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    101. Re:It's not a scam by haystor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to think this way too until I saw what my grandmother went through while she was being cared for in a home.

      There are a zillion scams targetted at the elderly. The typical one involves telling them all their benefits are going away and selling them a magazine subscription of a political group defending their benefits. I don't mean slight implications like saying, "The Republicans are looking to cut Social Security." I mean utter crap about how all Social Security could be cut to zero next month and Medicare will no longer be available. Subscribe to the XXX Defense Fund for $1000 a year and make sure this doesn't happen.

      A *lot* of these people have money. They listen politely on the phone. They consider businesses to be trustworthy (these are the same people that retired on pensions, so why shouldn't they?).

      Back in their day cars didn't have keyed ignitions (just door locks generally, open cockpits didn't have that). They didn't have to lock their houses.

      And for the it's-always-the-victims-fault-crowd:
      "It's their fault they got scammed." they say.
      "It's your fault you're not bulletproof." I say.

      --
      t
    102. Re:It's not a scam by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      In a way, you are saying the same thing. With something like the lottery, the variance outweighs the expected return. So if you're going to play, it doesn't really matter if you play it when the jackpot is extra large, or just normal.

    103. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was reading through this topic hoping to find one person with the wisdom and compassion to acknowledge the tragic side of this story, instead of just issuing contemptuous remarks about how the stupid guy deserved it. Thanks, & Happy Holidays to you.

    104. Re:It's not a scam by tsa · · Score: 1

      Here in Holland most of the money that is made in lotteries goes to charity. So even if you lose your money is not totally wasted. So everytime I didn't win I get this warm feeling inside because some people are now happy because I gave them my money... Another reason to play in lotteries is because gambling is fun. Expensive, but fun.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    105. Re:It's not a scam by (eternal_software) · · Score: 1

      The odds of the lottery are fixed. For any amount of numbers, you have the same chance of winning. The size of the prize does not affect the odds, and it is never "in your favor".

    106. Re:It's not a scam by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      That's why I only play $1 a drawing for both the Powerball and the state lotto. I used to play $2 a drawing just for the powerball (figuring that it would double my chances at the "good package" >, but even that is way too much of a long shot. A dollar gets me into the drawing and the state lotto is a much better shot, although still a long-shot. But, hey, someone has gotta win and for $4 a week, I'll let it happen to me.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    107. Re:It's not a scam by JohnPM · · Score: 1

      Well I don't agree that stupid people should suffer, I do think this Sessions guy is culpable. His $330,000 not only ruined himself and his wife, it has kept the scammers going for years and years. How many more people will they scam on the back of that money?

      I think anyone who responds to spam email (scams or otherwise) deserves to be strung up because it creates an atmosphere where that sort of thing is profitable.

      --
      Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
    108. Re:It's not a scam by thisfred · · Score: 1

      If they only preyed on the intellectually challenged I'd have a big problem with it, as I don't think lack of intellegence should be a punishable offence, nor do I think being smart is in itself praiseworthy.

      Luckily these schemes all take advantage of people's greed at least as much as their stupidity, and so mr. Sessions deserves all he got (or lost in this case.)

      merry kweznuz

      --
      "I Just Want You To Hurt Like I Do" - Randy Newman
    109. Re:It's not a scam by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The elderly are unfortunately often the target of overt scams because of this very fact, and because they often have retirement nest eggs.

      The elderly are also stubborn. The elderly are also a population with a high percentage of voters. So it would even be hard to pass laws to protect them from themselves.

      Imagine AARP or the Silver Foxes response to a law the limited the ability of older people to move money overseas.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    110. Re:It's not a scam by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Poppies in Afghanistan would be left alone even if people wouldn't starve, because the government has much more important things to deal with. Prostitution in Southeast Asia is left alone because of bribes and kickbacks, but mostly because it's socially acceptible, despite not being legal.

      I'm sure that the amount of money this brings in isn't lost on the Nigerian police, but it got that way because no one got busted, and no one got busted because the police certainly don't care. The fact that the scammers are ripping off rich Westerners probably doesn't spur them towards action either though.

      --Dan

    111. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you aware of sarcasm ?

    112. Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you could go with a lending company that screens applicants instead ? If the company was stupid enough to lend thousands of dollars to a guy who was taking out multiple credit cards and borrowing money like crazy, perhaps the company deserves to have uncompetitive interest rates.

    113. Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      ...I have a responsibility to myself and to those whom I care for to recognize it as too good to be true...

      What exactly is too good to be true? I mean, there are millions of people being ripped off by 'too good to be true' scams. One just needs to look at the stock market, or puchase of cars, or houses, or whatever. There is no such thing as 'too good to be true' because people have different thresholds. You cannot use that. Someone selling me a corporate bond with a return of 15% might be too good to be true for you. But maybe not to me. To me, it might seem reasonable, especially if the scammer justifies it using some finance-speak which I might not fully understand.

      Your argument is elitist. You might be ok with it but I certainly don't think it is helping anyone in society... you have to put yourself in other people's shoes...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    114. Re:It's not a scam by cduffy · · Score: 1

      One just needs to look at the stock market, or puchase of cars, or houses, or whatever. There is no such thing as 'too good to be true' because people have different thresholds. You cannot use that.

      First off, I object -- quite strongly -- to you taking single phrase out of my argument and ignoring the rest. That said, let me try to defend that one phrase, on the premise you're unable to find anything disagreeable with the rest.

      "Too good to be true" is a reference to the effect that an individual is responsible for maintaining and using some level of that thing known as "common sense". I will certainly agree that what qualifies as common sense is prone to variant interpretation -- but that's a matter of degree. We certainly might disagree on whether a 15% return on a corporate bond is something which a reasonable person should be suspicious of, but neither of us is likely to disagree that a promised 3000% return requiring a substantial upfront investment is something with regard to which a reasonable person should see fit to engage in substantial due dicipline.

      If my argument is elitist, it is such only inasmuch as it presumes that the average individual is reasonably intelligent and capable of looking out for their own best interests. Frankly, I believe that it is your position -- which presumes the average individual to be a simple-minded fool who must be protected lest they throw away their fortune -- to be elitist.

    115. Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      First off, I object -- quite strongly -- to you taking single phrase out of my argument and ignoring the rest. That said, let me try to defend that one phrase, on the premise you're unable to find anything disagreeable with the rest.

      I picked one sentence because I felt it summarized your view (your view being that people who are too stupid deserve it). I think that sentence represents your view. If not, I'm sorry; I have no intention of misrepresenting your views.

      "Too good to be true" is a reference to the effect that an individual is responsible for maintaining and using some level of that thing known as "common sense".

      My point is that "common sense" is next to meaningless. I personally think common sense is a conservative trait and should only be used as a last resort. Relying on common sense can lead to major mistakes. For example, common sense says that dropping a 100kg weight and a 10kg weight will result in the 100kg weight hitting the ground first. Science says that's not true. I personally rely on rationality over common sense.

      In any case, common sense varies with people. You cannot claim some person is "dumb" for falling to these schemes. For example, there are MILLIONS of people clicking on attached e-mail links (attached files, links to websites, virsuses, etc). That might be dumb to a person like you, who has knowledge of computers (and hence probably never clicks on an attached file). But claiming that these people are dumb is just wrong. The VAST MAJORITY of people, in this case, are not like you. They don't know anything about computers. Claiming that these people are dumb is simply elitist. YOU are making the claim that you are "superior" in some manner to these people and these people "deserve" what they get. The same thing applies to the Nigerian Scam.

      If my argument is elitist, it is such only inasmuch as it presumes that the average individual is reasonably intelligent and capable of looking out for their own best interests. Frankly, I believe that it is your position -- which presumes the average individual to be a simple-minded fool who must be protected lest they throw away their fortune -- to be elitist.

      That makes no sense. How can *I* be elitist? I think it's YOU who is more elitist. Aren't you closer to the definition than me? Anyway, this whole argument is pointless (neither of us are going to fall for these scams). BUT I just don't like your reasoning. For instance, if the government introduces some insurance, or some law which allows these victims to get their money back (although this would result in citizens paying some of the cost), would you be against it? I think you would; I wouldn't!

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    116. Re:It's not a scam by cduffy · · Score: 1
      Relying on common sense can lead to major mistakes. For example, common sense says that dropping a 100kg weight and a 10kg weight will result in the 100kg weight hitting the ground first. Science says that's not true. I personally rely on rationality over common sense.
      Common sense once said that. However, nowadays, any individual with a public-school education knows otherwise. Therefore, this is no longer common sense. Common sense, in short, is the set of things that an average individual should know -- via schooling, teaching from ones' parents, etc etc.

      In any case, common sense varies with people. You cannot claim some person is "dumb" for falling to these schemes.
      Yes, I can. Just because people vary in height, would you claim that I can't call some tall and others short?

      In any case, common sense varies with people. You cannot claim some person is "dumb" for falling to these schemes. For example, there are MILLIONS of people clicking on attached e-mail links (attached files, links to websites, virsuses, etc). That might be dumb to a person like you, who has knowledge of computers (and hence probably never clicks on an attached file). But claiming that these people are dumb is just wrong. The VAST MAJORITY of people, in this case, are not like you.
      Quite right. Not clicking on attachments isn't common sense yet -- at least not in most cases. I'd say there are some groups of people (particularly the young in areas with high computer use) in which this is common sense, but I'll certainly agree that it isn't, as of yet, for the general case.

      Where this differs from the Nigerian Scam is that opening email attachments is something that's new. Con men and scammers have been around for the ages, and a need for caution in financial matters has been constant for thousands of years. Stories condemning individuals who fail to exercise caution in caring for their families' fortunes have been part of the collective consciousness for ages. The comparison you propose between this and something so new as behaviour making one succeptible to computer viruses is simply untenable.

      How can *I* be elitist? I think it's YOU who is more elitist. Aren't you closer to the definition than me?
      Arguing that the poor are somehow so feeble-minded as to need protections (such as a mandatory "fraud insurance" tax) enacted by right-thinking individuals such as yourself is as elitist a position as I can think of. I hold that the vast majority of humanity is capable of fending for themselves, and thus that protecting the relative few who are not in fact capable of such at the expense of all is foolhardy.

      If we take the average man to be as intelligent as we are (an antithesis of the elitist view), then is that man not capable of deciding for himself whether it is more beneficial for him to purchase fraud insurance, or trust to his judgement and take his chances? In short: If you believe that you are better able to decide what is best for the average man than he himself is, "elitist" is the most effective word I can find.
    117. Re:It's not a scam by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your grandparents, but mine aren't mentally retarded.

      One word: Alzheimer's.

      My grandmother, before she passed away, was convinced there were people who lived upstairs -- in her ranch house.

      I think my father's greatest fear is getting it himself.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    118. Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Common sense once said that. However, nowadays, any individual with a public-school education knows otherwise. Therefore, this is no longer common sense. Common sense, in short, is the set of things that an average individual should know -- via schooling, teaching from ones' parents, etc etc.

      I think you are overestimating the impact of school there. First of all, I don't think many people took physics. Things like that are only covered in physics and at the high school level (if I remember). Second, the vast majority of the people STILL don't know that. Do a test. Ask the next 5 people you meet whether larger masses fall at the same rate as smaller ones and they probably won't get it right.

      Yes, I can. Just because people vary in height, would you claim that I can't call some tall and others short?

      I would have no problem with OBJECTIVE measurements. Things like intelligence, "how dumb you are", stupidity, and so forth are subjective. I don't want to create a world where some people are labelled as being stupid by another class that thinks they somehow are not, especially when there is the implication that these people somehow "deserve" it.

      Quite right. Not clicking on attachments isn't common sense yet -- at least not in most cases. I'd say there are some groups of people (particularly the young in areas with high computer use) in which this is common sense, but I'll certainly agree that it isn't, as of yet, for the general case.

      More like 50 years! A LOT of people still don't use computers. It is questionable whether the majority will EVER understand computers (just like how the majority doesn't know anything about science, or arts, or whatever... each human has particular interests).

      Where this differs from the Nigerian Scam is that opening email attachments is something that's new. Con men and scammers have been around for the ages, and a need for caution in financial matters has been constant for thousands of years. Stories condemning individuals who fail to exercise caution in caring for their families' fortunes have been part of the collective consciousness for ages.

      But these con men are SMART. They don't use the same thing. They modify it. They add things. They modernize it. They fix the flaws. And so on. Snake oil salesmen have been around for ages. The difference is that they don't sell snake oil anymore. This means that the general population still falls for them.

      I hold that the vast majority of humanity is capable of fending for themselves, and thus that protecting the relative few who are not in fact capable of such at the expense of all is foolhardy.

      It may be foolhardy but it is less elitist. Under your system, who dictates that someone is dumb? For instance, why not LEGALIZE these scams? After all, the "smart ones" will not fall for it, and the "dumb ones" deserve it. Isn't that what you want? Isn't that elitist?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    119. Re:It's not a scam by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can. Just because people vary in height, would you claim that I can't call some tall and others short?

      I would have no problem with OBJECTIVE measurements. Things like intelligence, "how dumb you are", stupidity, and so forth are subjective. I don't want to create a world where some people are labelled as being stupid by another class that thinks they somehow are not, especially when there is the implication that these people somehow "deserve" it.

      But are you tall or short? That's subjective -- I'm not measuring centimeters, after all, I'm just arbitrarily saying that this person is tall and that person is short. Is it morally wrong for me to think some people are short, because what qualifies as "short" is subjective?

      That said, the means I use to class people into "smart" or "dumb" for purposes of this argument are entirely objective, not to mention context-specific. See below.

      Where this differs from the Nigerian Scam is that opening email attachments is something that's new. Con men and scammers have been around for the ages, and a need for caution in financial matters has been constant for thousands of years. Stories condemning individuals who fail to exercise caution in caring for their families' fortunes have been part of the collective consciousness for ages.

      But these con men are SMART. They don't use the same thing. They modify it. They add things. They modernize it. They fix the flaws. And so on. Snake oil salesmen have been around for ages. The difference is that they don't sell snake oil anymore. This means that the general population still falls for them.

      See, this is where I'm running into your general presumption that the general population is dumb, and that while the elites like you and me are intelligent enough to avoid being scammed, this "general population" is by and large gullible enough to not recognize an old con wearing a new skin.

      Certainly, you disagree with me using the word "dumb" to describe anyone -- you'd prefer that I used very polite words to refer to the general population, yet at the same time you argue to the effect that the average member of the populace as a whole is less capable of fending for themselves than you or I am; in short, your argument is that there exists some elite class, and that you and I are members thereof.

      Understand me: When I use the word "dumb", I am not referring to the general population as a whole. I am referring to a subset of that population, a small subset, which is demonstrably incapable of intelligently looking out for their own interests.

      I hold that the vast majority of humanity is capable of fending for themselves, and thus that protecting the relative few who are not in fact capable of such at the expense of all is foolhardy.

      It may be foolhardy but it is less elitist. Under your system, who dictates that someone is dumb? For instance, why not LEGALIZE these scams? After all, the "smart ones" will not fall for it, and the "dumb ones" deserve it. Isn't that what you want? Isn't that elitist?

      No, incidentally, it's not what I want -- because rewarding any individual for lying to others is wrong.

      Even if it were what I wanted -- no, it's not elitist. The "smart ones" and "dumb ones" in the scenario you propose are determined not by some subjective means, but by whether they fall victim to a 3rd-party scam -- an entirely objective determination. You've made it clear you wouldn't consider "you must be this height" signs at amusement park rides to be elitist although they classify people into "tall" or "short" based on some objective mechanism -- why would you find some objection here? (And yes, they're context-sensitive -- the amusement park sign doesn't say you're generally tall, but that you're too tall to go on the ride safely; the scammer whose victims either fall prey or catch on likewise establish themselves as smart

  2. 419 Scam Infomercials? by DaRat · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, at what point will it become more profitable to run How to Run a 419 Scam seminars than it will be to actually run a 419 scam? Okay judging by the fact that people still get taken in, quite a while, but I can see the infomercials now...

    1. Re:419 Scam Infomercials? by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Would you like to buy my book? It's entitled: "How To Make A MILLION DOLLARS By Selling My Book!"

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:419 Scam Infomercials? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Argh, why don't they just cut off Nigeria (and any neighboring states that join in) from the internet!? They could complain all they want but they'd be cut off until they stopped the scams.

      On the other hand they would be free of endless spams pouring out of the US.

      Yah, yah, I know, it wouldn't work...

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:419 Scam Infomercials? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "So, at what point will it become more profitable to run How to Run a 419 Scam seminars than it will be to actually run a 419 scam? "

      You know, I laughed, and then realized that those commercials I'd seen for the "Internet Treasure Chest" and other crap like that is the exact same thing. They're not spamming people, they're making commercials that sell kits that teach you how to spam people. And if they can afford a tv spot (even at the slot they usually have) it has to be doing them some good.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:419 Scam Infomercials? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      It's because many of the 419 scams don't originate from Nigeria at all.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    5. Re:419 Scam Infomercials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of them do

  3. Simply Insane by OS24Ever · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just simply greed run amuck. Not by the scammer - but by the idiot who fell for it.

    I can't feel sorry for this guy in the slightest. This guy was a whole lot of stupid. Just insane to fall for something like that and need to spend $320K to get it.

    There is a certain personaility type that has to fall for this no matter where it was from. It's not the internet that has caused this, it's just helped people find more idiots to suck in.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. He was greedy in the classical sense and he paid for it.

      You'd figure that after 75 years on this planet he'd develop some common sense - This is not a knock on the elderly. I know a lot of old folks who grew up during some mean times and would never ever get scammed like that because they don't believe in the "free lunch" and they're always on their guard about stuff like this.

      Greedy fool.

    2. Re:Simply Insane by notque · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Did you even read the article?

      How can you not feel bad for this man who lost everything? There was no greed involved, only hope to do good with the money, and to keep the bills paid for a retiree.

      I know most of us are cynical as hell, but egads.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    3. Re:Simply Insane by nomadic · · Score: 1

      And even if it was due to his greed, does that really stop you from feeling sympathy? I mean, he's another human being, he's in a horrible situation, just try to feel a little empathy.

    4. Re:Simply Insane by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He agreed to help steel money from a bank account......
      He agreed to help commit a crime.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    5. Re:Simply Insane by OS24Ever · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I read the article start to finish prior to posting my comment. The guy is so stubborn and stupid to think that the government of the country is keeping him from his millions, not his friends.

      He's an idiot, plain and simple. When given documentation showing it's a scam he won't admit it, and won't even file an official complaint. He's a moron.

      He lost everything, yep. He's now a burden on society as a whole completely because he will loose his home, bankrupt off his debt and now the banking & mortgage industries will take the hit for it causing interest rates, and credit ratings to be just that much tighter for us non-greedy types to get a loan and/or credit card.

      The banking industry let him get *21* credit cards and cash advance all of them and no one blinked. They started blinking when they didn't get their payments though. That could be the only thing that might need to be fixed, the ability for a person to get *that* many credit cards in such a short time, and for no one to notice.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    6. Re:Simply Insane by Apreche · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't feel bad either. I in fact almost despise this man. Because of his ineptitude there are now drug trafficers in Nigeria who have some positive revenue. Why? Because this dumbass american is a fucking idiot. I feel bad for people who are screwed and it isn't their fault. Like a small child who gets kidnapped from the playground. Or someone who trips and falls into a fire. But if you are this dumb, your life deserves to be ruined. Darwinism at its finest I say.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    7. Re:Simply Insane by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      I read the article. I live down here with these 'nice guys'

      They are often either completely naive, or greedy with a good public face. This particular guy obviously had money to work with, and his line of lost everything is just greed's karma. I have serious doubts that he was that simple minded. If so, I have no sympathy, as my darwinistic instincts kick in. If not, I have no sympathy as my darwinistic instincts kick in.

      And yes, I am that cold hearted.

      I treat his story with the same skepticism as the Nigerian ones. He is Jack, and I don't know Jack.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    8. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Empathy? If you took all your money and flushed it down the toilet, do you deserve empathy? If you decide it'd be a neat idea to deliberately drive a 6" spike through your shin bone, do you think you're going to get a lot of sympathy?

      Don't get me wrong, I'm all for empathy... if unexpected medical bills had cleaned out his nest egg, or he'd lost it in some Enron-type pension plan raiding, I'd be Mister Empathy himself.

      But the long and short of the story is that he got greedy, he didn't listen to advice from good sources. Jesus Christ, he handed over $300,000 to these guys without even doing any due dilligence. And now he's in denial. This guy deserves everything he got, end of story.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    9. Re:Simply Insane by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      On top of this, probably these are the same banks holding his 1st and 2nd mortgages, loans, notes, etc. which he was cashing out... must not have any bulls there, to miss such a red flag. On the other hand, get one payment behind on a student loan and watch the dogs get loosed.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    10. Re:Simply Insane by nomadic · · Score: 0, Troll

      I really don't understand this mindset, the idea that you only feel sorry for someone's pain if they meet some arbitary level of worthiness. There's no point in arguing about it, I feel kind of sorry for you if you have to qualify your feelings for your fellow man that way.

    11. Re:Simply Insane by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      How can I not feel bad for him? Hope to do good with the money? What money? He got taken in by the concept there was money in the first place. If he had no greed he would have looked at it and said no thanks, I am fine just the way I am now. That is not showing no greed. Forget cycnicism, even when confronted with the reality of it the victim does not believe he was taken. Ok maybe he was not greedy, but if not greedy then certainly not in the proper mental state of mind to comprehend.

    12. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like him are responsible for the steady stream of SPAM-, hoax-, scam- and worm-mails that force me to install filters (with a non-zero false-positive probability) after which I still have to manually delete more trash than I get legitimate emails. These people deserve and get no sympathy at all from me.

    13. Re:Simply Insane by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ``Tell me more, he said, but don't ask me to do anything illegal.''

      That said, he was a moron.

    14. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am part of this man's collateral damage. He funded a criminal organization with one third of a million dollars, a small percentage of which will pay for tomorrow's spam. Why should I feel anything but anger for him?

    15. Re:Simply Insane by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, as he was scammed long after the reproductive age, this is NOT an example of natural selection at work. Too bad he didn't get scammed when he was 20.

      --
      Jeremy
    16. Re:Simply Insane by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the "arbitrary level of worthiness" is "didn't inflict it on themselves". We feel bad for people when bad stuff happens to them, we don't feel nearly as bad when they do it to themselves, especially if it is for some unbelievably stupid reason.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    17. Re:Simply Insane by starling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because of his ineptitude there are now drug trafficers in Nigeria who have some positive revenue.

      What, you think drug trafficking runs at a loss? The evil drug runners need to use scams like this because they sell of drugs at below cost? Yeah, right. That's progaganda, pure and simple - and you fell for it.

    18. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wish i could see you old and dying. and just sort of laigh ginerly as your heart stopped...

    19. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the article start to finish prior to posting my comment.

      Your new around here are you not.

    20. Re:Simply Insane by pe1rxq · · Score: 2

      Scammers: 'We want your help in robbing someones bank account'

      Idiot: 'Sure I'll help you rob someone just don't make me do anything illegal'

      So when you say 'don't ask me to do anything illegal' when helping criminals it somehow protects you from the law????

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    21. Re:Simply Insane by RichardX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's incredibly easy to denounce this guy as an obvious idiot - indeed, his stupidity seems absolutely breathtaking, and therefore he deserves all the flak he gets....

      Or maybe not.
      It's always so easy to denounce things from the other side, for example, lack certain beliefs that some other people hold (I'm staying nonspecific here so's not to get into an argument about religion, or whatever).. to me, it seems absolutely staggering that anyone could possibly believe some of the things I don't - but it's never that simple.

      This guy is not of the internet generation - he's older. In my experience to many older people the internet is some "magical computery thing" that can do anything. I know people of that kind of age who are every bit as shrewd, bright, and worldly-wise as their years should suggest, but you tell them you can download money from the internet, and they'll believe you.

      Secondly, his wife is partially disabled. That's likely to put financial strain on him and his household. Strain = stress, and stress generates emotional rather than rational thinking.

      Thirdly, it's often difficult for people to admit they've been taken for a ride - even very smart people. Put yourself in this situation:

      You've been offered a bargain.. it all looks legit, and it's something you really don't want to pass up.. A really nice PC/Mac for $100, mebbe.
      So, you send off your $100, and after a while you're informed that due to some oversight, the cost is actually going to be $105.

      At this point, you grumble.. but what do you do? Risk throwing in the extra $5 for the machine you really, really want, and prove to yourself that you aren't stupid... or prove that you ARE a complete idiot for falling for it in the first place by trying to get your money back?

      It's a pretty devious trap. A lot of people would rather spend a little more to get a "good" result.. and will repeat ad infinitum. A little more.. just a little more.. one more bit.. etc. It's an age old con trick, but it's survived this long with good reason.

      Anyways, this has turned into something of a long winded rant.. by basic point is - don't be too quick to judge.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    22. Re:Simply Insane by notque · · Score: 1

      I do not mean this to come off as angry but,

      If he had no greed he would have looked at it and said no thanks, I am fine just the way I am now.

      What in the hell are you talking about?! Our entire lives are driven to have more than we do!

      That is who we are as people. He looked at his situation, and saw a way to make it better.

      Just because the way to make it better sounded easy does not make it bad. Just because we know that it is a scam, does not mean we should hate him because he didn't.

      but if not greedy then certainly not in the proper mental state of mind to comprehend.

      (I'm assuming that he is naive) My Grandmother cannot send email successfully by herself, and often times has me print out things online to fax to her.

      She is certainly in the proper mental state of mind to comprehend things, but certainly not the internet.

      I'm amazed at the general anger in this guy's direction. He didn't know what he was doing, and decided to make a choice knowing full well he wasn't quite sure of what he was doing.

      As a simple example, we all do this. It's how we learn.

      I don't want to start a drive to collect money for this man, I just feel bad for him.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    23. Re:Simply Insane by 5.11Climber · · Score: 0

      The guys an idiot no question. I do however feel for his partially invalid wife.

      --
      Arf!
    24. Re:Simply Insane by hazem · · Score: 1

      You're probably right, but one shouldn't jump to conclusions.

      75 years is a good deal of time to build up wisdom, but by that time, most people's mental faculties aren't as sharp as they should be. He may be suffering from some kind of dimentia or alzheimers, etc. At 75 he fell for a scam that at 55 he might have seen right through.

      The problem is that unlike with physical ailments, you can't just look at someone and see that they're suffering from dimentia.

      Of course, he also may have been a greedy bastard.

      It sucks that one can spend an entire lifetime building wealth only to lose it in the end.
      It sucks to spend a lifetime acquiring knowledge and wisdom only to lose it in the end.
      And it sucks to spend a lifetime devoting your life to a god that probably doesn't exist, only to lose it in the end.

      Merry Christmas!

    25. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the guy isn't stubborn. he's just a typical old man. they don't ever admit when they've screwed up. i've watched my dad do this for the last couple of years. he'll screw up something and then never admit that he did it.

      i'm not sure why the fed. gov't doesn't crack down on aid to countries that protect the individuals who conduct these scams.

      while i feel for the dude...he had to have some inkling that this wasn't right.

      god doesn't put people in front of free money...ever. satan on the other hand...loves to put that green colored intoxicant up there.

      and whoever was dogging the student loan thing...amen. those people are freakin' vultures. the student loan system needs to be completely overhauled (at least on the collection end).

    26. Re:Simply Insane by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In other words, when you play Ultima IV, you choose compassion over justice. ;-)

      Suppose the 419 scammers who conned this dude, were caught and punished. Would you feel empathy, since they would also be human beings in a horrible situation?

      I guess there's a spectrum of degrees by which people earn their misfortune. Somewhere along that continuum, there's a point where our sense of justice and compassion are equal. One on side of that point, we feel sorry for them. On the other side, we hope they (and others who are watching) have learned a lesson.

      As for me, no, I don't feel sorry for this guy. People as greedy, reckless, and irresponsible as this, are one of the reasons I hate collectivism so much. I don't want to be in the same money market, insurance pool, or taxes-for-government-services deal as them. This isn't somebody just line me, who happened to have some bad luck or made a mere mistake. His suffering is a result of fundamental ethical failure, and yes, I want such people to suffer, and for the world to see that they suffer.

      Learn, world! Don't be like this guy. Don't be a 419 victim, or a cultist, or a compulsive gambler, or a drug addict. If you do, then you're destined to suffer, and I won't feel sorry for you or want to help you.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    27. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I hate is that it's not the same evil drugs that I want. I'd be cheering the man on if I thought his donation would wind up making LSD easier to find, or cheaper if I could get my hands on it.

    28. Re:Simply Insane by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      I think this was a joke. Why is it modded as Insightful? Can we mod the moderator as "Funny" during metamodding?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    29. Re:Simply Insane by rking · · Score: 1

      My Grandmother cannot send email successfully by herself, and often times has me print out things online to fax to her.

      So if some people said to her that they work for a bank, that someone in no way related to her has left a large sum of money in one of the accounts at the bank and that if she can help them to take it for themselves then she can have a share, do you think she'd go along with it? If so do you would you call that being "innocent"?

      They were playing on his dishonesty. However "naive" he was in not realising they were stealing from HIM, his intention was crooked in trying to participate in stealing from the bank / the depositor / the government.

    30. Re:Simply Insane by arf_barf · · Score: 1

      Very interesting indeed.

      One of the oldest credit scams is to max out your credit line and then go into bancruptcy protection. Did you know that in Vegas you can cash out all your Credit Cards as if your purchased something?

      Me thinks, 419 is just a cover for the real scam. And he will be even able to deduct the losses from the taxes :-)

    31. Re:Simply Insane by Avihson · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is not an internet scam. It is an old scam that has been around for years, now it is just easier to find "marks" by spamming on the internet. In days of old, the scammers had to be a bit better salesmen and judges of character since they did a lot of cold calling. This lead to the possibility of one of the marks knowing what was going on and reporting them to the authorities. It relied on human greed then and it relies on human greed now, not human compassion or religious zeal. It is "money for nothing"...

      Now most people just delete the spam, and those who try to report it usually are stymied by fake addresses or apathetic authorities.

      If the Government wants to plan some stings, they can give me the money to send to these guys and we can get some of them off the net. I'll do it for a mere 10%

    32. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >He's a moron.

      Yeah, but I bet he doesn't use 'loose' where one should use 'lose'.

    33. Re:Simply Insane by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is any particular relationship between 419s and drug trafficking.

      Drug trafficking is a profitable business in itself, and doesn't need subsidising.

    34. Re:Simply Insane by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      no, it was insightful. It may have been funny as well, but the fact is, in order to remove your genes from the genepool you have to do so BEFORE reproducing, otherwise there is no point.

      --
      Jeremy
    35. Re:Simply Insane by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      " He agreed to help steel money from a bank account......"

      Not true. The scam is that the Nigerian bankers need help to transfer money out of the country, or else the country confiscates it. This makes the country (in this case, Togo) seem like the criminals.

      If the nice American will provide a down payment and help move the $14 million, he gets half of it in return.

      Of course, there is no $14 million, and he pays them anyway. That's the basis of the scam. In this case, they kept on milking him for more and more.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    36. Re:Simply Insane by Mantorp · · Score: 1
      If the nice American will provide a down payment and help move the $14 million, he gets half of it in return

      This sounds interesting, tell me more. I may want to invest with you.

    37. Re:Simply Insane by anarchima · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you owe the bank $1000, you've got a problem. If you owe the bank $1,000,000, the bank's got a problem.

    38. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes and no. It's easy from the armchair to sit back and say "He should have done this." "He should have done that." "He should have listened to those who warned him." Unfortunately, though, when you're the one in the middle -- when you're the one who has thrown a lot of money into the situation -- you have an emotional investment that makes it that much harder for you to admit that you were wrong.

      It happens all the time. You become so desperate to believe, you'll ignore all the evidence telling you not to. It's another form of the "battered wife" syndrome: the husband continually beats his wife, but the wife won't leave -- she keeps telling herself that he'll change; he really does love her deep down; he doesn't really mean it. (Btw: I'm male. And there are cases where it's the husband that's beaten -- they're rarer, but they do exist.)

      This isn't funny. It's tragic. It's an illustration of what happens, every day, in the world -- maybe an extreme illustration, but very real nonetheless. Unfortunately, much as some would like to help, there is the sad fact that this man will probably throw any financial help he gets right back at the scammers.

      I don't have any answers. I wish I did. But understand: this man was only gulled because he trusted. The wrong people in the end, even when those he should have known he should trust told him not to, but he trusted. Our society would be a dire place without trust; he doesn't deserve our laughter for his mistake.

    39. Re:Simply Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credit card companies love this kind of people. They love to have someone bankrupt or so to make even more money. These people are the bets ones to spend more money, because when you start spending it, is lik enirvana for them.

    40. Re:Simply Insane by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

      Is sucks to spend a lifetime denying your Creator only to meet him and be separated from Him in the end.

      Merry Christmas to you too!

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    41. Re:Simply Insane by khasim · · Score: 1

      Check their pitches.

      Yes it is "illegal", but if you don't help get the money out of the country, it will be used by the evil, corrupt, baby-killing dictator.

      Is it so wrong to break a law to stop a worse crime?

      And no one is being hurt. The German guy died with his entire family and no relatives anywhere else in the world at all. They had all died the year before. Meteor strikes. The lot of them. A tragic coincidence.

      Anyway, if you don't help get this money away from the evil, corrupt, baby-killing dictator, then you're sentencing all those poor babies to death by this evil, corrupt dictator's hands.

      Wouldn't you break a little law to help save these children from the evil, corrupt dictator? Surely you don't support his corrupt, evil, baby-killing ways.

      These scammers have tuned their stories for years. They know what buttons to push with the people who will fall for them.

    42. Re:Simply Insane by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      What happens after you have reproduced and your kids are grown up can have a slight bearing on natural selection. Grandparents help look after children and can supply emotional and finacial support too, which does increase the chance of their DNA surviving another generation.

      If this guy was still able to help his kids out financially then perhaps they would be able to afford to have bigger families, spreading this guys DNA even further.

      With a bit of luck his kids will realise that their dad isn't the sharpest tool in the box and they will decide not to have kids to prevent the DNA going any further.

      ;-)

    43. Re:Simply Insane by Lewisham · · Score: 1

      I think the old age defence really, really doesn't cut it. People do not get stupid when they get old. Old people are, in my experience, *cleverer*. They are far more aware of social workings than I. That's life experience. As the other reply says, there is nothing new here. The fact that it was performed over the Internet makes it no less obvious what's going on.

      Let's say I take my car to the mechanics. I know nothing about the mechanics of a car (I'm only worried about the horses, baby! :) ), but I can see when I'm being screwed by the guys there. It's very easy to find some more problems. I just get them to fix what it was there for. As I am sure you, and many other people do. It's about spotting a scam. Many people are far less suspicious. That's cool. Good luck to them. But they're not losing hundreds of thousands of dollars for that extra sparkplug! When you hit triple figures for anything the yellow alert starts up for anyone who isn't making some real cheddar. And dear goodness, when the police tell you not to do something you should damn well listen!

      Arena you don't fully understand + Scam != Excuse

      Sorry, my reply ended in a rant as well. Merry Slashdot Christmas ;D

    44. Re:Simply Insane by danila · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is pure propaganda, thanks for pointing this out. I should also add that the same argument is often used to argue against piracy and pornography - these activities are used to finance organised crime. Today yet another claim is often made - that it is used to finance terrorism, which, while it doesn't have the same logical flaw, is still utterly ridiculous.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    45. Re:Simply Insane by nomadic · · Score: 1

      In other words, when you play Ultima IV, you choose compassion over justice. ;-)

      Well, spirituality always got you more stat points...

      Suppose the 419 scammers who conned this dude, were caught and punished. Would you feel empathy, since they would also be human beings in a horrible situation?

      Yes. Would I want them to not be punished because of that? No. But understanding someone should be punished doesn't mean you can't feel bad that they will be.

      Learn, world! Don't be like this guy. Don't be a 419 victim, or a cultist, or a compulsive gambler, or a drug addict. If you do, then you're destined to suffer, and I won't feel sorry for you or want to help you.

      Compassion should be universal. When you can feel empathy for the pain of those you hate, you've become a better person.

    46. Re:Simply Insane by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      that's a good point about inclusive fitness, forgot about that

      --
      Jeremy
  4. somebody should direct him to by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This site.... that should convince him he was scammed...

    1. Re:somebody should direct him to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's real helpful.
      Yes, we know he's been scammed; he knows he's been scammed. What would pointing him to a web site about the scammers do exactly to help?

  5. Golden rule by msgmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it sounds to good to be true it most probably is. period.

    I dont know who came up with that line but it holds true time and again.

    1. Re:Golden rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who taught you, but the golden rule is much more cheery than you think. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

    2. Re:Golden rule by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      The other one that my dad always quoted:

      TANSTAAFL
      There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe from Heinlein?

      The irony is that for $320,000 you could start your own profitable business, or make some decent money from real investment. Hell, you could even do better in Vegas, baby! Even if he had lost it all he would have had fun.

      My father was a little obsessed by grifters, pigeon drops and cons, so I had ample warning. Once, in San Franciso, an Afican man approached me on the street with his con. He was a merchant marine just pulled into port, had a scrawled address (which was a non-existant place) that he needed to find, and to top the story off, proved he didn't need money by flashing a 3 inch thick fold of bills to me. I laughed heartily and told him to go chase the pigeons.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    3. Re:Golden rule by MSBob · · Score: 1

      That fool and his money will always be parted with should be of no surprise to anybody. The only question that one must ask is how the fool and money got together in the first place... That's the million (sorry 320,000) dollar question.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    4. Re:Golden rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd, I thought the Golden Rule had something to do with doing unto others as you would be done unto...

      You managed to pull out a +5 for your post, regardless - congratulations!

    5. Re:Golden rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're mistaken, that is not the Golden Rule.

    6. Re:Golden rule by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That has to be the single most moronic tip I've ever heard (that has gotten this widespread).

      Read my rant to another poster with a similar comment, here:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=90470&cid=7807 391

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Golden rule by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      Yeah. Like that linux thing I keep hearing about. A free operating system? There's got to be a catch.

      ;-)

  6. Greed gets you where you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greed. Greed. Greed. Such a heartwarming story for the season. He got what he deserved.

    1. Re:Greed gets you where you want... by hodet · · Score: 1
      Yes it was greedy, but come on, an old guy and his wife get wiped out and you think they got what they deserved? I know the police warned him but I guess the old couple didn't have any grown up kids looking out for them.

      Today it's 419, but put yourself in a rocking chair at a ripe old age and see if you can spot the scam. It's easy to feel young and smug. I feel bad for the old geezer, in his mind they weren't breaking the law, he was just a trusting old guy.

      Makes me cheer for the folks at 419eater.com.

    2. Re:Greed gets you where you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put yourself in a rocking chair at a ripe old age and see if you can spot the scam

      If I live to a ripe old age (halfway there already) I will be able to spot the scam (failing a catastrophic head injury in the future.)

    3. Re:Greed gets you where you want... by rking · · Score: 1

      Yes it was greedy, but come on, an old guy and his wife get wiped out and you think they got what they deserved?

      I have sympathy for the wife, but the guy's intention was to help some supposed bank employees to get their hands on the contents of one of the accounts at the bank. If the scheme had been real then he should be facing prosecution and potentially prison. That he lost his money doesn't seem any great tragedy to me.

  7. For the love of... by fluxrad · · Score: 5, Funny

    "His trip to financial ruin began Feb. 2, 2002."

    Mr. Sessions, meet P.T. Barnum. Mr. Barnum, please smack Mr. Sessions as hard as you can upside the head.

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    1. Re:For the love of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2002/02/02?

      I don't get it.

    2. Re:For the love of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:For the love of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site is incorrect. You shouldn't believe everything you read on the Internet. I guess there is a sucker born every minute.

    4. Re:For the love of... by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      You must be smoking some good shit

      I thought the misassociation of a famous confidence trickster's words to PT Barnum was common knowledge... I mean this was stated in the A&E biography by numerous historians, as well as in the History Channel recanning of the same interviews.

      However, just because PT didn't say it, doesn't mean it wasn't true. But really, we're the suckers in the end... Since we've all got to pay higher rates now.

  8. Ouch.. by MattC413 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can see why he won't admit to having been scammed, and keeps denying that those people were scammers.

    At that age and point in my life, if I were to admit that I were completely scammed out of everything I had worked for my entire life because of a scam that has been around for decades, it would probably make me a broken man.

    How long can someone that age live with a broken heart?

    1. Re:Ouch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should rephrase that last sentence.

      How long can someone that age live?

    2. Re:Ouch.. by notque · · Score: 1

      Very Insightful. The hurt that man must feel is tremendous.

      To try and understand that the world you thought you were so wise about, after many long years, has shown that all of that wisdom doesn't mean anything in this day.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    3. Re:Ouch.. by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > How long can someone that age live with a broken heart?

      Sheer power of ego. He knows it, probably not even deep down. But he's so insufferably prideful he can't admit it to anyone. He may have partially convinced himself.

      Or maybe he grew some brain cells and decided this is how he can sell the story. Or perhaps he's really a scheming genius who plans to abscond with the cash from the mortgage, made up some nigerian scam cover story after getting a scam mail, and will leave his wife holding the bag while he lives it up in the tropics somewhere. Hanlon's razor says probably neither of these is true. I guess his wife loses either way.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    4. Re:Ouch.. by fermion · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why he won't admit to being scammed. If he admits his mistake he is just stupid. If he doesn't, then he is admitting criminal behavior. Not only that, but he is admitting that he belives criminal behavior to acceptable. It is bad enough to be greedy enough of a person to think crime is the best path to wealth. But to hang onto that notion even after the evidence is presented is just perverse.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Ouch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason he won't admit to being scammed is the same sort of self hypnosis that makes people go back and back to bad relationships, saying "I'm sure he won't cheat on me this time". The same thing that makes people stay in in their job waiting for the promotion that's been just around the corner for years. The same thing that makes people play the lottery every week with the same tickets, because they're bound to win sometime. It's more common than you think.

    6. Re:Ouch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How long can someone that age live with a broken heart?
      I don't know. Dick Cheney seems to be doing pretty well. Unfortunately.
  9. Common sense by r_glen · · Score: 1

    "...to this day he does not think he was scammed. He ignored police warnings that the deal was bogus and instead blames his losses on corrupt foreign governments."

    I feel bad when I hear about these stories, but there's always a bit of "if you can't use even the most basic of common sense, perhaps you had it coming" mentality. Wrong, I know (especially for an elderly man) but come on... my grandmother is more careful with her money and she's dead!

    1. Re:Common sense by mblase · · Score: 1

      my grandmother is more careful with her money and she's dead!

      Well, I imagine that does make it a bit harder for her to sign checks to fraudsters.

    2. Re:Common sense by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well... Some do succeed in voting :)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Common sense by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

      Just because you reach a certain age does't mean you can start doing stupid things. People don't think, "Oh, wait, he's a senior citizen--I'd better not scam them." In fact, they think the opposite. When more than two people tell you that what you're doing is a baaaaad idea, then chances are you ought to re-think what you're doing. My father--68 and going strong--knows that TANSTAAFL, and this guy should have also.

      Don't feel sorry for this man, feel sorry for his wife. This idiot squandered away all of thier money FOR MAGIC BEANS! I'm wondering how many other scams from hucksters he's fallen for over the years. Fool.

      David

  10. I have no pity for stupid people by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    Fact: An offer too good to be true, usually is.

    1. Re:I have no pity for stupid people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact: People often, misuse the comma.

    2. Re:I have no pity for stupid people by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That has to be the single most moronic tip I've ever heard (that has gotten this widespread).

      Read my rant to another poster with a similar comment, here:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=90470&cid=7807 391

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  11. Wow by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This was on fark yesterday. What cracks me up is that they guy doesn't even think he was scammed. He blames governments for holding the money, and he considers the criminals his friends. Actually, never mind, that doesn't crack me up. It makes me sad.

    1. Re:Wow by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      He probably can't face the truth because it would destroy his ego. He tells himself this story to protect himself psychologically. Notice in the article though they mention that he occasionally hints that he knows he was scammed.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  12. Before you start feeling pity for him... by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have to look at the signs. First, we have the obvious there is no free lunch and if it looks too good to be true, it probably is

    Next, we find this line:
    He ignored police warnings that the deal was bogus and instead blames his losses on corrupt foreign governments
    OK, so even the police told him that this would go bad, he continued to dump his money. So now we have "too good to be true" coupled with warnings from the law that he was going to get fleeced

    The actual premise of the transaction doesn't even sound legal. A banker needs to move money that isn't his by using an offshore account?

    The account had been dormant for years -- ever since the businessman and his family died in a plane crash, the e-mail read. The "banker" needed help moving the money. Otherwise, the government would confiscate it.

    That's where Sessions fit in.


    And finally the trump:

    Still, Sessions was so mesmerized by the well-spoken West Africans that to this day he does not think he was scammed. "I consider them my friends," he says. "They're not criminals."

    If this guy had more money and they asked for it, he would give it up. It goes beyond stupid and trusting to the point of insanity. Yes, he's old, but when you've been warned by police and god knows how many others, lost all the cash you have,and face losing your house then you should know you've been robbed.

    This guy has more in common with a gambling addict than a victim. He's still not giving up. I really wouldn't be surprised if he would have given to TV preachers or others who might have fleeced him had the nigerian scammers not caught him first.

    1. Re:Before you start feeling pity for him... by AJWM · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The actual premise of the transaction doesn't even sound legal. A banker needs to move money that isn't his by using an offshore account?

      Yep. There's an old saying, "you can't con an honest man". Most big cons have some element of dishonesty (beyond the "getting something for nothing") because it helps to discourage the mark from checking on the legitimacy of the scenario in the first place.

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Before you start feeling pity for him... by Otter · · Score: 1
      There's an old saying, "you can't con an honest man".

      There are cons that exploit people's generosity as well -- pretending to have car trouble and robbing someone who pulls over to help being a classic example. Those are doubly evil, first in their own right and secondly as they discourage people from generosity in the future.

      But, as you say, 419 scams are driven entirely by the pigeon's greed and willingness to cut corners. Probably the best thing about them is that they at least familiarize Americans with Africa a bit. US news coverage of Africa is so poor, and Africa is taught in schools entirely from a perspective of Kwanzaa-ish idiocy, so those spams are probably the only reason anyone has heard of, say, Laurent Kabila.

    3. Re:Before you start feeling pity for him... by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      The actual premise of the transaction doesn't even sound legal. A banker needs to move money that isn't his by using an offshore account?

      It isn't legal, it's wire fraud as I recall. The illegality of what you think you're trying to do is why no one ever nails the scammers for it. You lost your money trying to commit international wire fraud? Sounds fitting to me.

      --Dan

    4. Re:Before you start feeling pity for him... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      There are cons that exploit people's generosity as well -- pretending to have car trouble and robbing someone who pulls over to help being a classic example

      I don't think that I'd label that as a con -- confidence game -- so much as just simple thuggery. But point taken.

      --
      -- Alastair
    5. Re:Before you start feeling pity for him... by andrewagill · · Score: 1

      David Mankins tells a story about a German tourist who needed to buy dinner and only had 50 marks. He explained that he only had $5, and that the exchange would be unfair to the tourists. They needed to eat, though, and so he exchanged it.

      Turned out it was a *Weimar* note (you know, German Hyperinflation during the 20's)

    6. Re:Before you start feeling pity for him... by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      "you can't con an honest man"

      David Maurer, in his classic sociological work, The Big Con: The Story of the Confidence Man, reports that con men look especially for people who believe that they are honest. They say that the man most vulnerable to being conned is the man who sincerely believes in his own honesty. Once you believe in your own honesty, you are at risk of being conned.

      In the story at hand, Mr. Sessions clearly believes himself to be an honest man.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    7. Re:Before you start feeling pity for him... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      First, we have the obvious there is no free lunch and if it looks too good to be true, it probably is

      That has to be the single most moronic tip I've ever heard, widespread.

      Read my rant to another poster with a similar comment, here:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=90470&cid=7807 391
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. Denial's a wonderful thing isn't it. by antis0c · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My take is on this is more than likely he knows he was scammed. He would rather believe a lie he knows is a lie than accept the fact he was swindled for all he's worth.

    It's easier to blame "corrupt foriegn governments" than it is to blame yourself for being taken in by it. I think the poor guy is just too embarrassed to admit he was swindled.

    But did anyone else get the impression off this article like they were really poking fun of him instead of covering a real piece of news. Kinda like, "Look at this stupid old guy, haha"

    You know what else is a little odd:

    Jim Stratton can be reached at jstratton@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5379.

    That just screams, "please send donations." Makes you stop and think, who's scamming who..

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
    1. Re:Denial's a wonderful thing isn't it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's the reporter's email and phone number

    2. Re:Denial's a wonderful thing isn't it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Did you RTFA? Stratton is the reporter--contact info such as that you quoted is more-or-less SOP for on-line articles.

    3. Re:Denial's a wonderful thing isn't it. by GbrDead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jim Stratton is the reporter.

    4. Re:Denial's a wonderful thing isn't it. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      You know what else is a little odd:

      Jim Stratton can be reached at jstratton@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5379.

      There's nothing at all odd about printing the reporter's contact information. Many papers do it.

      Why in the world would you see that as a plea for donations? Did you not read carefully and though that Mr. Stratton was the victim, or something?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:Denial's a wonderful thing isn't it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easier to blame "corrupt foriegn governments" than it is to blame yourself for being taken in by it.

      You misread the article. He's blaming the foreign government for the "fees" he had to pay along the way -- "fees" that the scammers concocted. The government wasn't ever involved.

    6. Re:Denial's a wonderful thing isn't it. by Fruny · · Score: 1
      You know what else is a little odd:

      Jim Stratton can be reached at jstratton@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5379.

      That just screams, "please send donations." Makes you stop and think, who's scamming who..

      That's the journalist.

  14. A new T-shirt by attackiko · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I sent the scammers $320,000 and all I got was this lousy carved wooden elephant and antelope"

    1. Re:A new T-shirt by lxt · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Register used to do a great 419 T-shirt, but you can still get an "All my money went to Nigeria and all I got was this lousy t-shirt".

  15. Time to take away.. by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    his drivers license--no more Information Super Highway for you!

    1. Re:Time to take away.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Information Superhighway is a tollway.

      This guy can no longer afford a pot to piss in let alone the toll to get on the Information Superhighway.

  16. Robin Hood all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steal from the rich, give to the poor...

    In any case, the guy here had enough to get by but wanted more. That's greed, and he certainly paid the price.

    1. Re:Robin Hood all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no shit. America - and by extension, this particular old rich white guy - has enriched itself for centuries by exploiting third world nations like Nigeria. Now this guy ends up giving back a little, and we're supposed to feel sorry for him? Bull fucking shit.

      Go Nigerians, keep scamming idiotic Americans.

  17. $285K to clean the powder off the money??? by pj737 · · Score: 0

    What I want to know is how someone this stupid could get so much "cash" to throw around in the first place.

    1. Re:$285K to clean the powder off the money??? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Since when has being stupid prevented you obtaining money? Bush never had any problems.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  18. I don't think he is a scammer by andy666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    i helped him out and i made a bundle! with the money, i bought a great house with a fantastic mortgage. then i married a beautiful russian bride, and i pleasure her with my surgically enlarged, viagra driven member. During sex, I take photos and print up hundreds of copies, but hey no problem - I have an excellent source of toner....

  19. Sounds like Scientology.. by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get the victim hooked, keep bleeding money out of him until he's ruined, and all along he'll insist that he's not being robbed.

    Sad. Very sad.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Dean for America

    2. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look pal, if you make me laugh Coca-cola through my nose one more time, I'm gonna... aw forget it.

    3. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only sounds like Scientology if you don't have the slightest clue of what you're talking about. Moron.

    4. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by tindur · · Score: 1

      I suppose you want to say you can get rid of the Nigerians.

    5. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      True. After all, if he comes to his senses and admits publicly that he was scammed, the Nigerians won't start stalking, harrassing, and suing him to shut him up.

    6. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, it works. Great job LRH.

    7. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by j0e_average · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and I've got one word for you: XENU. That's the biggest bunch of '50s sci-fi crap I've ever read about. I'm continually amazed at how many people continue to voluntarily choke on L.Ron's member.

    8. Re:Sounds like Scientology.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Does "AC" stand for anonymous clambot now?

      I do indeed know what I'm talking about when it comes to scientology. A good friend of mine is currently a refugee in Canada, due to the vicious persecution he's suffered when David Miscavige decided to stop him from picketing at all costs.

      Do a google search for "Keith Henson" for details.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  20. if only by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I think the Lord uses people to do his work," Sessions said. "With that money, we'd be comfortable, and we could do some good things."

    This statement is another way to pc package the concept of greed. If only God would let me win the loto I promise I will use it to do the Lords work - after of course making myself "comfortable".

    1. Re:if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the Lord was using these Nigerian scammers to teach this guy a lesson on greed by taking his money.

    2. Re:if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pc package"

      What has selfishness got to do with being "pc"? Last time I checked lots of far-right evangelists are happy to live cushy lives while occasionally tossing a few bucks at the needy. Usually they spend the money on boosting their memebership instead.

      Don't make it political.

    3. Re:if only by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      There is a small book inthe Bible that does exactly as you say. Jabez was the servant of God who prayed that the Lord give him a good plot of land, and God did.

    4. Re:if only by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1
      "I think the Lord uses people to do his work," Sessions said. "With that money, we'd be comfortable, and we could do some good things."

      I, on the other hand, have realized that people use the Lord to do their work.

  21. No sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His own stupidity AND HIS OWN GREED lead to this mess. Stop playing these losers as victims. It insults us all.

  22. Nothing to do with greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything to do with stupidity

  23. Persistent Bastards by warpath · · Score: 1


    I once responded to one of these Nigerian scammer mails, thinking it would be a little amusing to string them a long for a while with funny responses. (Hardly an original idea, I know. There's more than one example of this on the web.) So I made up a name, a persona and everything. I emailed him and started talking percentages and trying to broker "myself" a better deal and teasing them about when I might be able to fly to wherever to do their business deal.

    Well, I eventually got wrapped up in a big project at work and didn't have enough time or energy to continue the charade so I just stopped replying.

    SIX MONTHS LATER, they still occasionally email me to try and get out deal going because they "still need my help".

    Tenacious.
    </boringstory>

  24. I'm Bitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does someone that stupid have $320,000?

  25. Whoa guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a Ormond Beach 419 scam on the horizon. Get any emails from a guy in Ormond Beach telling you how to get rich, ditch 'em!

  26. Alive and Well by aufecht · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is exactly why SPAM is thriving and so widespread. Someone, somewhere will fall for anything, no matter how propostrous. A million may complain about SPAM, but it only takes one to buy into the scam. I mean, this one he should have seen a mile away and yet he lost a ton of money. Sad.

    1. Re:Alive and Well by nomadic · · Score: 0, Troll

      Is there any especial reason you're capitalizing "spam"?

    2. Re:Alive and Well by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

      He's trying to make the point that he's worried about the widespread proliferation of canned meats, as apposed to everyone's first, incorrect assumption, that he is talking about unsolicited email.

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    3. Re:Alive and Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any especial reason you're capitalizing "spam"?

      Probably.

  27. I'd laugh, but... by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...I lived through the dot-com stock bubble.

    You don't have to be old and retired to be seduced by people promising you 500% returns on $50,000 investments. Twenty-somethings will fall for it if you use enough marketspeak.

    1. Re:I'd laugh, but... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      The difference being that there is some legal protection with the stock market, and there are plenty of people who *have* made money on the stock market. Compare this with 419 scam victims. No one has ever made money on them. The stories about these scammers have appeared in just about every major newspaper, and the US government gives out free advice about avoiding overseas scammers.

      I'll grant you this though: Direct-sell financial firms made a ton of money on twenty-somethings by reducing investment strategies to basically buying an expensive lottery ticket (on a single stock).

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    2. Re:I'd laugh, but... by StormReaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You don't have to be old and retired to be seduced by people promising you 500% returns on $50,000 investments. Twenty-somethings will fall for it if you use enough marketspeak."

      If you do it once and lose your $50,000, you could be a victim of bad luck and market fluctuations. If you do it six times with money you can't afford to lose, you're just dumb.

      I do feel sorry for this guy, though. He worked (probably hard) all his life to accumulate his nest egg. He seems like a genuinely caring and overall good guy except for his astronomically sized greed.

      The fact that he was monumentally greedy does not mitigate the fact that his money was taken under fraudulent circumstances. Being greedy does not make him any less a victim.

      It would be like blaming a retarded virgin girl for being a rape victim on the grounds that she should have known that the rapist was lying to her when he told her that good things would happen to her if she would just put out. The whole point is that she can't make that kind of informed decision without a guardian.

      Granted, the man is not medically retarded and is fully capable of making his own decisions. However, his trust was still abused by the scammers. They are about 80% to blame, while he is about 20% to blame for failing to apply common sense due to extraordinary greed.

    3. Re:I'd laugh, but... by Illserve · · Score: 1

      This is taking compassion too far.

      One could keep extending this analogy until we are all sitting around feeling sorry for poor Adolf Hitler because after all, it was his upbringing that shaped him into a mass murderer.

      Somewhere you have to draw a line and say that this person is to blame for his screw up and then stick it to him. It is through drawing such distinctions that we learn what to do and what not to do, both by crossing that line ourselves, and by observing what happens to others.

      And I have to ask, what makes him seem like a caring guy? The fact that he's willing to risk the nest egg and lifestyle that his disabled wife is depending on to make a fast buck?

    4. Re:I'd laugh, but... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      It would be like blaming a retarded virgin girl for being a rape victim on the grounds that she should have known that the rapist was lying to her when he told her that good things would happen to her if she would just put out. The whole point is that she can't make that kind of informed decision without a guardian.

      It isn't anything like that at all. It would be like a hooker promising some guy free sex for every six times the guy paid, then reneging because "my pimp won't let me," then the guy's wife getting pissed about the guy fucking hookers all the time and leaving, and the guy blaming the pimp for breaking up his marriage.

      There. My analogy is infinitely more convoluted than yours (and yours is incredibly convoluted) and MINE IS APPLICABLE! I WIN!!!

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    5. Re:I'd laugh, but... by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "And I have to ask, what makes him seem like a caring guy? The fact that he's willing to risk the nest egg and lifestyle that his disabled wife is depending on to make a fast buck?"

      No, that makes him stupid (read my original post). He seemes genuinely caring because he seems to want to believe the best in (non-governmental) people.

      Don't misinterpret my compassion for his situation as an excuse for his idiocy. The point that my analogy was trying to make, though, is that idiocy on the victim's part does not excuse fraud on the perpetrator's part. Neither does greed on the victim's part excuse fraud on the perpetrator's part.

      If some business had sold him $320,000 in products that he didn't actually want or need, but didn't mislead him as to what the products did, then this guy would be 100% at fault for the whole thing. But fraud changes the balance of blame.

    6. Re:I'd laugh, but... by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Point A. He doesn't want to believe the best in people, his brain has kicked up a defense mechanism to keep him from losing it and jumping off a bridge.

      Point B. If he's earned enough in his life to front $320,000 he should know better. This guy doesn't deserved sympathy in the sense of the mentally disabled. He deserves derision for having willfully ruined his life with greed.

    7. Re:I'd laugh, but... by xYoni69x · · Score: 1
      If he's earned enough in his life to front $320,000 he should know better.
      But he hasn't - the $320,000 is mostly bank debts. RTFA:

      Between selling his investments, running up credit-card bills, depleting savings and borrowing against his house, the total comes to about $320,000. Most of that is new debt.
      --
      void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
    8. Re:I'd laugh, but... by Illserve · · Score: 1

      I said he fronted it.

      Not that it wasn't his.

      Not everyone can walk in and get $320K in loans.

    9. Re:I'd laugh, but... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as taking compassion too far!!!

      As far as Hitler is concerned, can you prove that it was his upbringing that made him do what he did? If anything, Hitler did what he did because of the ideology he supported. It wasn't his upbrining. There were/are tons of wealthy people, smart people, etc that support fascism--even to this day. In any case, why would someone feel sympathy for Hilter? Compassion and empathy comes from some terrible thing that happens to a person. It NEVER justifies the victim's deeds, regardless of what those deeds are.

      Somewhere you have to draw a line and say that this person is to blame for his screw up and then stick it to him.

      What exactly is "stick[ing] it to him"? Are you one, like some on Slashdot, that want to criminilize mistakes? The problem with the world is not this guy. No he isn't. Instead, the problem is people like you... people who want to hurt those making mistakes and possibly create a fascist society where "stupidity" leads to death...

      Yes I'm angry at the Slashdot response... All of you lack a heart... and on Christmas to boot... :(

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    10. Re:I'd laugh, but... by Illserve · · Score: 1

      No, of course not. Nor do I want to cause him further harm.

      But a person who does something like this should be made to confront the fact that it was a tragic mistake of judgement, not coddled and told he's a nice caring person, and maybe next time he'll get that 12 million.

      There are times when folk need to be brought into contact with unpleasant truth, it's part of learnin.

    11. Re:I'd laugh, but... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as taking compassion too far!!! ... Compassion and empathy comes from some terrible thing that happens to a person. It NEVER justifies the victim's deeds, regardless of what those deeds are.

      Presume, then, the following:

      Some person commits a bad deed which causes harm to a number of others. Some consequence of this deed comes around to the individual who committed the harm. Should others, out of compassion, save the "victim" from what might be considered the just desserts of their actions?

      Consider the case where "just desserts" may be criminal charges of some variety. The "compassionate" thing to do might be for a governor (or like individual with the power to do so) to forgive all criminals of their crimes, for instance; is that to say that this is an appropriate course of action?

      The problem with the world is not this guy. No he isn't. Instead, the problem is people like you... people who want to hurt those making mistakes

      Not that we wish to do harm to those making mistakes out of malice, but we wish to see bad deeds -- such as giving money earned by others to criminals, and thus encouraging future criminal behaviour -- punished. Fortunately, in cases such as this, the bad deed is its own reward, so no additional punishment is necessary -- the man who gives his money, and that borrowed from others, to thieves finds himself amply rewarded by his actions by the loss of his savings, a result which (while it will not help those who must pay higher interest rates because of his defaulted loans) discourages others from making the same error.

      Ideally, others will learn from this story, and fewer will fall victim to this scam, and so there will be less reward in the future for the bad people who would perpetrate such a thing. The goal, then, is the reduction in people who will fall victim to this scam, and thus a reduction in profit to be made via this scam, and thus a reduction in individuals perpetrating the scam.

      Yes, we have little compassion with regard to the effects on those whose greed leads them to victimhood -- but the end result (the reduction in scammers) is a Good Thing, and the people who come to harm via being victims did so not by chance but by their own actions... so, que sera sera, no?

      Yes I'm angry at the Slashdot response... All of you lack a heart... and on Christmas to boot... :(

      It's not that we're heartless -- not all of us, anyhow -- but that we aren't headless either, on Christmas or otherwise.

    12. Re:I'd laugh, but... by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      All of you lack a heart... and on Christmas to boot... :(

      I'm not disagreeing with what you said, but the christmas reference annoys me.

      If you are a christian (and I'm not) then surely the idea is to be a forgiving person all year long, not just at christmas. Anything else is hypocracy.

  28. TANSTAAFL by discovercomics · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "a sucker is born every minute."
    Captain Alexander Williams, a New York City police inspector at the time, attributed "There's a sucker born every minute, but none of them ever die" to Joseph Bessimer, a notorious confidence trickster of the early 1880s known to the police as "Paper Collar Joe".
    Scams have been around for a long time and there will allways be some soon to be poor fool who falls for it.
  29. I feel no pity... by mac+os+ken · · Score: 1

    I feel no pity for this guy. It is absolutely ridiculous that people with money to throw around foolishly try to get so much more. This boils down to greed.

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  30. He's probably not stupid by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    as much as he was greedy - as many have said. I think the greed made him act in a stupid manner. But if you sat down with the guy - unaware of all this- you would probably think he was pretty normal.

    I could be wrong about that- but the point you bring up makes me think he is probably somebody of decent intelligence, able to have accumulated some nice things in his life that enabled him to come up with all this cash.

    I read about this yesterday and I think the story doesn't have a ton of value beyond it being a freak show type thing. The size of his losses and his inability to recognize what happened are like a traffic wreck- you can't help but look and say 'WOW'.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:He's probably not stupid by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I read about this yesterday and I think the story doesn't have a ton of value beyond it being a freak show type thing. The size of his losses and his inability to recognize what happened are like a traffic wreck- you can't help but look and say 'WOW'.

      Maybe the story's value lies in the potential for the next clueless schmuck to read it and be discouraged from doing the same thing before he dumps any money into it.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:He's probably not stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah yeah yeah. I'm wondering just why didn't I meet him before he lost all his cash. Are there more of those (I mean the kind of those morons who lost their money in the scam) around?

    3. Re:He's probably not stupid by Sly+Mongoose · · Score: 1
      I read about this yesterday and I think the story doesn't have a ton of value beyond it being a freak show type thing.
      They should put this ass on prime-time television. They should spend 30 minutes making the viewers know exactly how stupid he is, and how much he's going to suffer in the months to come. They should point out that he will probably suicide in less that a year, but that first, he and his wife will have to eat Dolly, the sweet brown Boxer.

      And they should urge the viewers not to send him one red cent because if they do, he'll just pass it over to his "associates."

      Then, maybe, there would be a slight reduction in the number of greedy idiots who sign up to assist well-spoken West Africans steal money from the National Bank of Ooogabooga-land!
  31. Does this guy live in a cave? by serutan · · Score: 1

    Unbelievable as it may be that anybody would go to the lengths Sessions did -- buying the scammers cell phones and other things, travelling halfway across the world, etc -- the most unbelievable thing is that he somehow managed not to get the word that this is a fraud. As the article says, almost everyone with an in-box has received these messages. I would think almost everyone who surfs the web would also have run across the phrase "Nigerian Spam Scam" and get a clue.

    1. Re:Does this guy live in a cave? by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      the most unbelievable thing is that he somehow managed not to get the word that this is a fraud

      He was told by the police that the deal was a fraud. He ignored the warning. It's in the article.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  32. Re:Yet another reason why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word.

  33. This may be callous... by xaoslaad · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...but the only sad thing to come out of this story is that it was an old geezer who had a chance to breed and raise his retard children before Darwin got to him. Lets hope next time it's soemone younger that gets nailed; before they have a chance to proliferate their fouled DNA.

    1. Re:This may be callous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So horrible, yet so funny. I had to moderate that one +1 funny :)

    2. Re:This may be callous... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      You're perfectly correct. It is callous.

    3. Re:This may be callous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refresh my memory here - Aren't these South Floridians the people who elected your head of state?

  34. By the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compliment of the day , i am Mr.GERALD EGEDE the campaign chairman for Nigerian Presidents re-election bid for the second term .The outfit is acronamed [V.O.A ie; VOTE OBASANJO ATIKU]for 2003 or [OBASANJO/ATIKU FOR PRESIDENT 2003].This organization was saddled with the resonsibility of massive campaigning and lobbying which necessitated the huge amount of fund approved for the organization programmes. After the whole election which ended on the third of may, the Presidents party,[P.D.P...PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY]won absolute majority both in the federal and state level.Now after the electioneering campaign expenses, we discovered that we have the sum of Twelve million dollars[USD$12,000 000.00]left , so myself and two senior officers f the organization agreed to solicit for your assistance in helping us to secure a foreign bank account as a matter of urgency where can get this fund remmitted . The unfortunate thing is that hence we are civil servants under the presidency, we are barred from operating a foreign account by the Nigerian constitution Act called the code of conduct for government personells/officials. Be rest assured that this transaction is 100% risk-free for it is assumed within the presidency that the whole fund was expended in the electioneering campaign since the President and his vice won overwhelmingly in the election .Every workable modality for the smooth remmittance of this fund into your account has been worked out. Send across to me ,your personal hone and fax numbers for easy communication .The bank account information where you would want this fund remmitted to my official email;gerryegede@presidency.com,idrisbello22@zwall et.com.You can equally send the required information to my direct fax line 234-1-7591746,mobile 234-80-33247458.Please endeavor to keep it a top secret more importantly lookout for any investment for us in your country where the burden of taxation will not take a high toll on the fund.Coming to the sharing of the fund , we will discuss it after the fund has been remmitted int your account and it will be in the ratio that will foster our relationship and equally be of mutual benefits to both parties and I will personally come over to your country for the sharing. What we hold in mind is we are to get 75% while you and your partner if any gets 25%of the total sum but it is still open for dialogue and discussion . I have the convinction that you have the maturity which entails trusth, honesty and sincerity to handle a transaction of such magnitude , based on this, i am not going to look for another person until i hear from you. Remain blessed while i wish you success in all of your endeavor.I am Yours truly , MR. GERALD EGEDE

  35. We're the one's that pay... by k4hg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Fine to say it is his fault, and have a good laugh at his expense, but it doesn't work out that way...

    As the article says, most of that money is in new debt. He'll never be able to pay it back, so it will become the loss of the finance companies. They will raise the interest rates we have to pay in order to recoup that money.

    And of course, since the guy will lose his home and has no money, he'll have to go on welfare to get his rent and food money. He won't be able to pay for his health care co-payments any longer, so he'll bail on those bills, making his doctors and hospitals raise their rates for paying customers and insurance companies.

    Yes, he was stupid, his life will be crap, but we are the ones that have to pay for his stupidity!

    1. Re:We're the one's that pay... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      I say we part him out. Sell off his organs on eBay, and use those funds to pay off any bills he ran up. Or put him into a government work camp where he can pay back his debt to society.

  36. [deleted by Carnivore] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes you stop and think -- who's trolling who?

  37. Feel sorry for him by Quixote · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It is quite easy, for us (20|30)-year olds to pass judgement on this man. But consider this:
    • He is 73
    • He and his partially disabled wife needed the money
    • He comes from a simpler time, a different era
    Please don't be harsh on him.

    What if, 50 years from now, there's a scam going around , today, you won't in your wildest imagination consider possible? Would you fall for it? It is possible some of you would.

    Please don't deride this old man, but feel sorry for him. He's ruined, with a disabled wife to take care of.

    If anything, us young folks also have to share some of the blame in not spreading the message clearly that such things are scams.

    1. Re:Feel sorry for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, the same feeling i got when i first read that.
      we should do something about this to bring those morons under law. but how? IANAL :(

    2. Re:Feel sorry for him by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Couple problems with this
      1. This scam has been around almost as long as he has, The oldest reference I could find is a reuters article in '91.
      2. The internet had nothing to do with it, this used to be delivered via fax, and good old US Mail
      3. He was greedy, and used god as a reference to fulfill his greedy needs. Just as bad as spending your life savings to win the lottery


      I don't buy it. hell the police TOLD him while he was being scammed it was a lie and he disagreed with them.
      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    3. Re:Feel sorry for him by serutan · · Score: 1

      Good point. As amazing as it is that he fell for it to the extent he did, you gotta feel sorry for the guy. We can only hope that the scammers nuts get nailed to the wall so future victims will be fewer.

    4. Re:Feel sorry for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait until I'm 73 and I can do whatever the hell I want too ...

    5. Re:Feel sorry for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can only hope that he did not have any kids to pass his moron genes to the next generation.

      He ignored police warnings that the deal was bogus. He was warned!

      Deride this stupid fool so other stupid fools won't fall for this scam again.

    6. Re:Feel sorry for him by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My grandfather, a cop during your simpler time, has told me story after story about hucksters, scammers, con men, and all variety of snake oilers. He is 82, so he lived through the same times as our questionable man. His first reaction on seeing the Nigeria e-mail was to laugh. He even showed me a story from the Orlando Sentinal he had saved (don't remember the exact issue) where they busted a guy for using almost the exact same scam about funding a gold mine. So it's not even an original one.

      Aside from which, said old man was warned by friends, family, even the police. No issue there of failing to spread the word. Just a gullible, greedy, old fool.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    7. Re:Feel sorry for him by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      He was trying to help someone else commit a crime.

      How would this be different then someone coming up to you and saying, "Hey give me some money so I can buy a gun to rob this bank, if you do I'll give you half of what I take." Then you do it and they run off with your money.

      It's not like these scammers were posing as some charity or something. They involved him in a scheme to take millions of dollars from a dead man's bank account. Clearly not a legal thing to do.

      As for not spreading the message clearly, the police even warned the guy it was a scam. How much clearer can it get than that?

      Why should I feel sorry for that? The guy entered into an illegal conspiracy to defraud a bank and a government and he got taken.

      Perhaps next time when presented with an opportunity to rip someone off he'll pass on it.

    8. Re:Feel sorry for him by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Scam or not, if my wife needs the money, I'm sure as hell not going to be giving my money to anyone else.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Feel sorry for him by Saeger · · Score: 1
      What if, 50 years from now, there's a scam going around...

      What? No cure for scarcity, stupidity, or alzheimers in 50 years?

      Kill me now.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    10. Re:Feel sorry for him by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      It is quite easy, for us (20|30)-year olds to pass judgement on this man. But consider this:

      He is 73


      He should be wise enough at that age not to fall for scams like that.

      He and his partially disabled wife needed the money

      He shouldn't have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on strangers promising him riches unseen then.

      He comes from a simpler time, a different era

      No, there always have been scammers and con artists, there have always been charlattans and snake-oil salesmen.

      Being old is no excuse for stupidity or gullability.
      Had he been 20/30, he would have fallen for it all the same.

      What if, 50 years from now, there's a scam going around , today, you won't in your wildest imagination consider possible? Would you fall for it?

      Probably not, I'm carefull about scams, I am also untrusting and cynical. And the nigerian scam was possible 50 years ago, it started with snail mail in the 80's, it could have started with snail mail in the 50's.

      Please don't deride this old man, but feel sorry for him. He's ruined, with a disabled wife to take care of.

      He ruined himself. He got conned, but they didn't put a gun to his head, they politely asked for money while distracting him with greed, god, and his hatred for government and taxes.

      Guess what, his taxes paid for the cop whom he ignored. He should put more trust in his country's legal advice than in claims of foreign treasure.

      If anything, us young folks also have to share some of the blame in not spreading the message clearly that such things are scams.

      No, the blame lies with himself and his nigerian "friends". It is not our resposibility to beat these idiots with cluesticks.

      He probably was scammed many times over in his life, this is just the culmination of his mark career.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:Feel sorry for him by nathanh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It is quite easy, for us (20|30)-year olds to pass judgement on this man. But consider this:

      Look, you've pushed a particular button of mine with this one.

      * He is 73

      Ok.

      * He and his partially disabled wife needed the money

      Ok.

      * He comes from a simpler time, a different era

      No, I strongly disagree with this. There seems to be this all-pervasive myth that you go back 70 years and everything was rosy. People left their doors unlocked. Everybody tipped their hats to ladies in the street. Con-artists didn't exist and policemen had nothing better to do than provide consolation to young toddlers who had temporarily lost their mothers while shopping.

      It's a nonsense. Go back 70 years and there are drugs, crime and corruption on an incredible scale. The mafia rules several cities. Drive-by shootings are basically invented. Policemen are murdered in their homes. Con-artists swindle the entire population out of their money leading to a rather well known market crash; makes Enron look like a child's tantrum. Hollywood movie stars are involved in drug scandal after drug scandal. You have street gangs, street crime, etc.

      You need to lose this rosy-coloured vision of your history. Simpler time? Don't be stupid.

    12. Re:Feel sorry for him by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      He comes from a simpler time, a different era

      A simpler, different era where you ignored cops explaining to you that this was a scam?

      Here's a hint: we didn't invent con jobs in the last 20 years.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    13. Re:Feel sorry for him by Morky · · Score: 1

      Seventy three means he was a young man in the 50s and 60s. Not exactly the age of innocence.

    14. Re:Feel sorry for him by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      I would feel sorry for him... but he still thinks it is NOT a scam. He was told over and over again that it was ascam and to not send anymore money. He blames the governemnt over there saying his buddies gave the govt. the money. He thinks his buddies are A,OK... STILL. For that I do not feel sorry for him. He needs to wake up and realise he is screwed.

    15. Re:Feel sorry for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My father, if he were alive today, would be much older than this gentleman. My mother is older. Both my parents taught me critical thinking. Both taught me that wealth is earned by work. My father fought in WWII to earn the right to a free college education, and a better life for himself and his family. My mother came to the USA to earn the right to be a free and self-determined woman.

      They invested their money wisely. They did not buy things they did not need. They did not buy us things we did not need. They worked hard until their well deserved retirements.

      This has nothing to do with being old. It might have something to doing with a spouse's sickness, but I often wonder why people that old need desire so much expensive medical care. My father created his world until he died. He did not take expensive medical care even if it would let him live a few years longer. He lived the life he had as fully and honestly as he could. He could not see lying in hospital bed when he could be working on the acerage.

      It is all about greed. It is criminal behavior. And both of these were as alive 80 or 100 years ago, remember the robber barons, as it is today

    16. Re:Feel sorry for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you!

      I scrolled through dozens of "what a loser", "he DESERVES what he got" etc messages, finally someone with a little sense to put this in perspective.

      This guy is a victim, who in a time of desperation, trusted the wrong people. He is also not the only one to fall for this!

      The people who took this money are professional criminals.

      To put down this poor guy is to side with the criminals.
      and to say he got greedy is to overlook the fact his wife is disabled and he NEEDED money. This isnt some hot shot CEO who was looking to double his money, its a retired old man. Cut him some slack!

      So thanks for setting it straight.

    17. Re:Feel sorry for him by shivianzealot · · Score: 1

      My grandfather, a cop during your simpler time, has told me story after story about hucksters, scammers, con men, and all variety of snake oilers.

      Wouldn't you expect a police officer who has delt with scammers professionally to be more in-the-know than a "retired electronics specialist?" Your grandfather has obviously been around the block and knows much better, to his admirable credit - but who's to say this guy wasn't at home with his soldering iron?

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    18. Re:Feel sorry for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right everyone that does something really really stupid is a victim.

      Cry me a river. We all need more money for something.

      You must be a dingy broad. that doesn't care about facts or reason, your only argument is emotion and how you FEELL about something..

    19. Re:Feel sorry for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoted from my 72 year old father (who was, at one point a loan officer for a major bank, responsible for loans of millions of dollars a piece):

      "This guy is a dumb shit."

      I don't think age is the factor/excuse here.

    20. Re:Feel sorry for him by Inda · · Score: 1

      I love reading about British criminal history and it's true; there was just as much crime 100 years ago as there is now.

      I think the modern media has a big part to play in our perception of crime. We get to hear about everything these day.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  38. Had your coffee yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, Jim Stratton is the article's author.

  39. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old retired person probably living in Palm Beach county. No wonder.

  40. What if? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
    Okay... call it greed if you want, but like it or not, this could easily be your mother, father, grandfather or grandmother. To those that are uninformed, have lost retirements in the last four years, been spending more and more money on medicine (his wife is *disabled*, after all) these scams look just real enough to be true and play on just the right strings to make them fall for it.

    Have your parents ever been in that situation? Would you be sitting at your computer calling them stupid and greedy just the same? Please remember that these are real people behind the names.

    1. Re:What if? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If my dad was warned by the police, me, his friends not to do it, and lost all his money, yes I would be calling him stupid.

      fortunatly, my dad is smart enough to know better. If he did think it might be worth while, he would contact me or my siblingss, and heed are advice.

      Now this idiot will be a burden on society.
      His children will now be in a posistion to have to care for him and his disabled wife.

      Now, I would take my father in in a heart beat, regardless of the reason, but I would not pretend it would be easy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:What if? by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      Would you be sitting at your computer calling them stupid and greedy just the same?

      Of course, why wouldn't I?

    3. Re:What if? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I would like to believe my family would not agree to steal from a dead man and continue after a warning from the police.

  41. On the other hand... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you read a news story about people too dumb to be real...it's probably true!

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  42. Do anyone has this guy's email... by JamesP · · Score: 0

    I have these great proposals to show him...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  43. poor sap..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and to make matters worse.....

    he is a DEMOCRAT!!!!!!

    voted democrat party line from day one.

  44. Damn greedy bastards. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    And I'm not referring to the Nigerians.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  45. Lincoln was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you really can fool some of the people ALL of the time.

  46. Hubris by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you think you are too smart to be conned out of your money, you're wrong.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Detritus wrote:

      If you think you are too smart to be conned out of your money, you're wrong.

      Bullshit. Anyone can be defrauded despite the most stringent precautions but being conned requires that one be seeking something for nothing -- it's the essential ingredient of a con. If you're not receptive to something-for-nothing deals you can't be conned.

    2. Re:Hubris by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      If you think you are too smart to be conned out of your money, you're wrong.

      I'm smart enough to listen to the police telling me I'm being conned.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:Hubris by CPM+User · · Score: 1

      Better than being too skint to be scammed out of money

    4. Re:Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most important bit of advice on avoiding cons is:

      ANYONE CAN BE CONNED.

      YES, EVEN YOU. YES, EVEN ME.

    5. Re:Hubris by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      OTOH, I try not to let blind greed get in the way of my hubris.

    6. Re:Hubris by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      Said by a guy who just loaned me 1500 dollars so I could subscribe to slashdot while sick at home in bed. :-)

    7. Re:Hubris by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Too smart? Maybe not. Too paranoid? Definitely.

      I've seen cons that I would definitely fall for. For example, last year the manager of a respected local title company started pocketing the money of people who were using the company in order to arrange financing on real estate. Made several million in a few days, then fled, leaving the customers in the very uncomfortable state of totally broke.

      I feel sorry for those people. I don't feel sorry for this guy. The difference is, no amount of due diligence would have warned the real estate buyers that the title company was going to turn on them. In this guy's case, even a small amount of investigation would have saved him. He failed to do it because he simply wanted it to be true.

      I hope they catch the scammer, and that the guy sees some of his retirement again. But he deserves to learn a hard lesson, and the fact that he doesn't appear to be learning doesn't tweak my sympathy any.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I be conned? Sure--it's hard, since I'm basically honest, but salesmen sometimes convince me to buy something I don't need (extended warranty, anyone?), and that's basically a con. But I'd never have fallen for anything even remotely like this.

    9. Re:Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But are we stupid enough to be caught by this con? A clever enough scheme can catch anyone, these schemes aren't normally that clever, they target greedy fools.

  47. Those dirty rats, they should have been clicked. by dan.hunt · · Score: 1

    Report Economic Crime On Line is an international effort to stop this sort of thing. It is true that greed causes the scams to flourish. The people who's wallets are emptied are someone's mom, dad, aunt, or uncle. Here is a commercial in Windows Media Format. and a text version

  48. desperation by dh003i · · Score: 2, Interesting
    these types of things reel in desperate individuals who don't want to work for their money, or do the research to learn how to invest it well. In general, if someone tells you that you can make lots of money by doing no work, they're trying to scam you.


    It's not all black and white. There are even some companies in the US that have a sort of queezy feel to them in regards to their offers. Pre-Paid Legal has an iffy feel to it (see News on Pre-Paid Legal. It's a MLM company which sells
    That was a grey-area example, But offers which promise to make you rich while requiring no work from you are almost invariably scams. There's an easy way to detect a scam: listen to your gut. If something doesn't feel right, you shouldn't go with it.

    1. Re:desperation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if people around your house often wish you would just shut up instead of saying something else that is patheticly obvious.

      Then again even if they did, you probably wouldn't notice.

    2. Re:desperation by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A tiny amount of research could've saved him from this mess (he obviously had internet access). Instead he let his greed lead him to a point where he not only has jeopardized his wife's future but he is too scared to admit he was scammed. His mental health demands that he pretend the scammers are the good guys and were victims of their big bad government.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  49. This guy KNEW he was doing something wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or at least he thought he did.... helping a crooked banker transfer money that wasn't his in violation of another nations banking laws.

    A good scam often involves making the sucker think that they are one of the insiders pulling something off on someone else.

    How ironic that this sucker was also a "Christian" and what firmly set the hook in his mouth was an appeal for divine aid in the proposed illegal activity.

  50. ehhh by jford235 · · Score: 1

    its stuff like this that makes me scared of geting old. You abandon reason when you get old? I understand that he thinks differenly and may be more trusting, came from a simple era, etc, but still, thats no reason not to have common sense.

  51. 419 Scams, Ponzis, Insurance, U.S. Debt... by mankey+wanker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Plenty in common there:

    Greed.
    True believers.
    Those that get stuck with the debt.

    Nobody thinks they were scammed. The leaders were just good honest men that were themselves misled. When all other justifications fail, try the old "God works in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform."

    Don't be so quick to point the finger at the imbecile in the story -- look in the mirror first.

    Fight control. Question authority. Rebel. Be free.

  52. I Say So What by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There must be millions of scams working in the world today. Just because a particularly lame one has entrapped this man does not make him special. The most interesting fact regarding this article is how someone that gullible got that much money to lose in the first place.

    In fact victims of this scam probably deserve less pity (the only reason for coming out in public that you were duped) than most other. For a person to bite on a Nigerian scam they must be unusually greedy. Many other scams take advantage of altruism. It is those that deserve some pity. Be not admitting to being scammed (yea right like he doesn't know when an article is written about him being scammed) the man seems to want to come off innocent and naive probably to gain pity and a new income. But this is just him trying to scam the altruistic masses of the internet. This man just reaped what he sowed.

  53. Finally.... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    surfing all day pays off.

    (Another hour and I can leave this empty building)

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  54. Scams on the Elderly by ChuckDivine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not quick to blame the victim in this case.

    My mother is 88 years old. You would not believe some of the scams that target the elderly. The ones I've seen are, surprisingly enough, quite legal. For example, selling reports on lotteries you may have won or soliciting for charities that keep practically all the money for themselves.

    Some of the elderly do have difficulty distinguishing between reality and fantasy. Most do not. For those who do it's partly it's because of problems that happen to people who grow quite old -- and sometimes it's due to having grown up and aged in an era in which normal people were not targeted by frauds.

    If the man in this story was, say 43 or 53, I'd be much harsher. But, by 73, he could be suffering from some problems that limit his ability to understand reality.

    What should be done? Damned if I know for sure. But I think younger relatives should keep a close eye on their elders. That way you can limit the damage done to Mom or Granddad by this kind of scum.

    --
    "Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- B. Franklin
    1. Re:Scams on the Elderly by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Sage advice. If fact, a lot of "charities" target older people and hire professional "fund raisers" who know what heart strings to pull (often appealing to religion, politics or patriotic ideals or showing pictures of poor miserable starving babies).

    2. Re:Scams on the Elderly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After my 91 year old Grandmother died we found out she had been sending large sums of money to various TV Ministers. Her faith told her these men of the cloth would not be hucksters, but sadly Falwell, the Bakers, the PTL club and others bled her dry. After her death we still recieved mail begging money from her.

    3. Re:Scams on the Elderly by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true, that does happen. My grandmother was targeted by a fundraiser from Beaver college (now I think called Arcadia, I'll leave it to you to figure out why) during the year she was dying. The woman visted her multiple times in another state while my grandmother was basically unable to talk for more than a few minutes at a time. She convinced her to give quite a bit of money, and even visited her in the hospital in her last days, getting more money. On the other hand, there are many (perhaps most?) reputable charities (I work for one) that use fundraising for very legitimate purposes and don't push elderly people into doing something they otherwise wouldn't.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    4. Re:Scams on the Elderly by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      But, by 73, he could be suffering from some problems that limit his ability to understand reality.

      What should be done? Damned if I know for sure.


      Maybe William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson were on to something?

    5. Re:Scams on the Elderly by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Sorry did not intend to cast all charity fund raising in a bad light. I just despise those that go out of their way to envoke an emotional response.

      I remember my parents receiving newsletter from the moral majority. Every article was written to give the impression that unless they received adequate funds "RIGHT NOW" that the cherished american way of life was offer and the (atheists|communists|liberals) would win.

    6. Re:Scams on the Elderly by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1
      and sometimes it's due to having grown up and aged in an era in which normal people were not targeted by frauds.

      What age was this? Are you really that ignorant that you think scams and fraud are a new thing?

      "3 Card Monte" is not product of the Internet era.

    7. Re:Scams on the Elderly by estherandherdoll · · Score: 1

      But I think younger relatives should keep a close eye on their elders. That way you can limit the damage done to Mom or Granddad by this kind of scum.

      I'm betting that this naive 73 year old didn't decide himself to get an e-mail account. Whoever it was that decided he needed to be wired should have made sure he knew about these kind of things.

    8. Re:Scams on the Elderly by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Some of the elderly do have difficulty distinguishing between reality and fantasy.

      So you're, what, suggesting that he believed that the police were actually smurfs from under clover hill, trying to dupe him out of his duty to collect money from individuals in another country?

      I find this sort of argument infuriating. This man was warned by more than one cop and was informed that the secret service was investigating. He was offered hard evidence. He proceeded, AFTER the hard evidence, to invest a third of a million dollars, half of which was not his money, into anonymous ne'erdowells on the other side of the planet. He was willing to trust his own judgement via flat text over that of dozens of professionals with resources he can't dream of.

      and sometimes it's due to having grown up and aged in an era in which normal people were not targeted by frauds.

      What are you talking about? Fraud has gone *down* tremendously since his childhood. Some of it was so common that it's part of our vocabulary - snake oil shills, magic elixirs, bait and switches, lowballing, market insurance.

      Maybe they were growing up in that city that the Walgreens commercials always talk about.

      Look, this sort of thing makes me angry. You're being an apologist, assuming things and ignoring the facts that are handed you. If it weren't for the third-of-a-million-dollar difference, I'd accuse you of being as bad as the asshat that started this story.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    9. Re:Scams on the Elderly by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      This is VERY important! Particularly when memory fades. I've known of one woman that had given to a political party many times and doesn't remember any of it. My grandpa "loaned" $20,000 to an uncle but doesn't remember why, it is too difficult for him to think and concentrate on what happened last week, and said uncle has been stalling on it, he sunk it into an investment and for some contrived reason he claims it can't be recovered quickly.

      The elderly can't read and probably don't even see fine print.

      You have to have someone watch your parent's tracks, sometimes you even have to take their checkbook and put them into a special community or nursing home meant to take care of the elderly.

    10. Re:Scams on the Elderly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the man in this story was, say 43 or 53, I'd be much harsher. But, by 73, he could be suffering from some problems that limit his ability to understand reality.

      If this man is really 73, has problems disinguishing reality and fantasy, then he probably shouldn't be in charge of his $300,000 in retirement money, should he? I mean, his wife could have been in charge of the "estate". Or maybe children if he has any? But really, if he has that many problems, then someone else would have stepped in. I think this man was just really stupid, and fell for an old trick. He was even warned by authorities before turning over all his money. There is no one to blame except for himself.

    11. Re:Scams on the Elderly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother is 88 years old.

      Quick quiz:

      If the police came to your mother, and told her that the people whom she had never met that she wanted to send money to were criminals, and that they were lying to her, and she wouldn't get anything that they promised, would she say "No, I think the police are lying, I'm going to go $300,000 into debt to send money to these people I've never met, because they are promising me millions."

      If so, the best thing you can do for your mother is to have her ruled incompetant, and start taking care of her yourself.

      Seriously. Have her move in with you, so you can take care of her. Maybe get her a private nurse.

    12. Re:Scams on the Elderly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >He proceeded, AFTER the hard evidence, to invest a third of a million dollars, half of which was not his money, into anonymous ne'erdowells on the other side of the planet.

      Can u say "kickback" :)

  55. Re:Fuck him in the ear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and, as has been pointed out many times - he agreed to help the scammers out in a scheme that looked illegal anyway. So no, I feel no sympathy, no pity. His greed led him to ruin. If more people felt the consequences of their actions, the world would be a better place.

  56. Amazing stupidity by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

    This guy is just amazing, he still thinks it's not a scam. I can't help but wonder if the article is being a bit fast & loose with the facts. I mean how dumb can the guy be?

  57. This just proves it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all human life is precious. Neither the sucker's or the crook's. This guy was a naive moron.

  58. who uses who by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    from the article

    Mr.Sessions said "I think the Lord uses people to do his work,"

    he forgot the devil does as well.

    1. Re:who uses who by Cpl+Laque · · Score: 1

      I know this was modded as funny but really it should be insightful.

    2. Re:who uses who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just about to say that...

      If you strip away religious crap (god and devil cancel each other out), you come out with "some people are evil and some people are good".

      Why do we need supernatural bullshit to explain human nature?

      Sorry, but I make it a point to AC when posting after drinking.

  59. Other variations on the Nigerian Scam by sagefire.org · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Learning Strategies theoretically hired me to train other people to teach classes using The Interwise Platform to K-12 students. They promised me a salary of $45k. I have filed the proper papers with the Attorney General for failure to pay an employee. Also, my case was reviewed by a labor lawyer who says it looks good, but since it is a government case, it will take some time.

    Why am I posting this here? Well, the other day, someone else that Learning Strategies failed to pay sent me the following. This came from the FBI:

    THIS IS NOT AN AUTOMATED REPLY

    Thank you for your submission of information via the FBI.Gov Web site. In as much as the FBI receives reports of this type of activity on a regular basis there is no need to forward any such additional emails to the FBI.

    You indicate that you are aware that these solicitations are fraudulent, so I will not caution you against responding to them. However, I have included our standard caution to the public simply because it contains information of which you may not be aware.

    ____________________

    A review of the information you provided revealed that you are being approached over the Internet to participate in one of many variations of an advance fee scheme being perpetrated by individuals from various West African nations, particularly Nigeria. Victims have lost substantial funds in the past and all requests for travel to foreign locations should be ignored. The United States Secret Service (USSS) has developed an excellent, detailed description of this fraud scheme, which can be accessed at http://www.secretservice.gov/alert419.shtml. If you have been victimized by one of these schemes, please forward appropriate written documentation to the USSS, Financial Crimes Division, 950 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20223, or telephone (202) 406-5850. We encourage you to share this Web page with family and friends. Your continued cooperation in this and other matters is greatly appreciated.

    It is not always clear that one is being scammed. In my case, I had been paid a nominal amount for classes I taught as an independant contractor ($435) before they offered me fulltime work. Learning Strategies owes me $4375. But, who knows if I will ever see it.

    If anyone has any sugestions on how to get the ball really moving on this I would greatly appreciate it. As would all of the other people who were promised salaries that never got them.

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Other variations on the Nigerian Scam by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Let me guess, you just need a few thousand dollars in "legal assistance" to help you "reclaim" your lost wages, which you will then offer to split with your "business partner".


      Sorry, just kidding, I couldn't resist. Getting fucked by an employer is pretty suck - happened to a friend to the tune of $20,000 when he was asked by his employer to postpone his wages for a few weeks, then a few more weeks, etc. for several months until he finally told them to shove it and got a lawyer (he got his money eventually).

    2. Re:Other variations on the Nigerian Scam by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I don't see anything here, but how is this an advanced fee scheme? I mean, in order for it to be an advanced fee scheme, you need to pay them, not them paying you Doesn't sound like the same thing at all. Don't know about where you're from, but in Vancouver, BC, small claims court has a $10,000 limit. Looks like "The People's Court" has a $3,000 limit. Still gets you most of your money.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  60. This quote proves it! by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1
    He had no idea the dead-executive story had been around for 20 years. He didn't know that the scammers routinely exploit a victim's faith in God. And he never noticed the "government documents" looked more like certificates a first-grade teacher might hand out.

    Instead, he blamed -- and still blames -- corrupt government officials. If only they paid off the right people, he thought, the money would be released.

    "With every move, the government comes up with another ridiculous fee," he said. "It's incredible."

    This guy is amazingly stupid, I'm suprised that he's still alive and not rotting in the african wilderness by now.

    Jonah Hex
    1. Re:This quote proves it! by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      >This guy is amazingly stupid

      Ya know, "Intelligence is an Universal Constant. And the number of people is growing."

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  61. Ruling the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...the target (who lost $320,000) is still having a hard time accepting that they were thieves.

    It's knowing that people like this are citizens of the USA and that the USA is a democracy that makes me think that maybe, just maybe, the USA shouldn't be trying so hard to put itself in charge of the affairs of the rest of the world.

  62. Re:Feel sorry for him? by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Please don't deride this old man, but feel sorry for him. He's ruined, with a disabled wife to take care of."

    He's been ruined by his own greed and stupidity, and was apparently quite happy to steal money from the bank account of a dead man. Why should I have any sympathy whatsoever for someone like that?

    "What if, 50 years from now, there's a scam going around , today, you won't in your wildest imagination consider possible?"

    If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If you remember that, you'll never fall for one of these scams. To do so you need to be either crooked or stupid or both.

  63. Cut the guy some slack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, he's 73. Think how much the world has changed in his lifetime.

    Secondly, he may have made the first payment out of greed, but if you read the article, what comes out is how much he trusted the scammers involved. I'd bet that by the end his primary motivation was 1) not to let down his "business partners" and 2) he was already in so far, he didn't feel he could turn back.

    Lastly, if you still can't muster any sympathy for him, try feeling sorry for his partially-disabled wife.

    1. Re:Cut the guy some slack. by notque · · Score: 1

      First of all, he's 73. Think how much the world has changed in his lifetime.

      Secondly, he may have made the first payment out of greed, but if you read the article, what comes out is how much he trusted the scammers involved. I'd bet that by the end his primary motivation was 1) not to let down his "business partners" and 2) he was already in so far, he didn't feel he could turn back.

      Lastly, if you still can't muster any sympathy for him, try feeling sorry for his partially-disabled wife.


      Great comment. At least someone feels quite similar to the way I do about the situation.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:Cut the guy some slack. by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      "First of all, he's 73. Think how much the world has changed in his lifetime."

      419 scams are *NOT* new. They're just more popular now that email is fast and simple.

      Unfortunately pyramid schemes, 419 scams, etc have existed for a very long time. The fact that this guy didn't know about them is because he's a dumb inbred american who doesn't spend a second to learn about the world around him.

      Too bad!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Cut the guy some slack. by andrewagill · · Score: 1

      The Nigerian Scam, also known as the Spanish Prisoner scheme, has been around since 1588.

      He may be old, but he's not *that* old.

      (that said, I do feel sorry for him. Not particularly sorry, but sorry.)

    4. Re:Cut the guy some slack. by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um no.

      You know you can be upset at the scammer and the fool at the same time.

      For instance, if a dude buys something [say from OEM Express] then opens it, realizes it doesn't work and tries to bring it back the same day and finds out he can't get a refund despite the store has a clearly delineated refund policy [that allows upto 7 days].

      That's a scam.

      A dude that sends 320K to a complete stranger so he can lock into twenty percent of $20,00,0,000.00 US DOLLARS is a fucking moron.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:Cut the guy some slack. by rking · · Score: 1

      First of all, he's 73. Think how much the world has changed in his lifetime.

      When someone approaches you asking for your help to appropriate the contents of someone else's bank account, you refuse or you realise that you're involved in a crimninal conspiracy and are not going to get any sympathy if your fellow conspirators steal from you instead of from the bank. I doubt very much that that has changed in the course of the last 73 years.

    6. Re:Cut the guy some slack. by andrewagill · · Score: 1

      Yes, he's a moron, and I feel sorry for him for that reason. Were he my grandfather, I'd be very upset with him, but I don't really know this guy. So I'm allowed to feel pity.

      Anyways, I mainly agree with you. It's not a matter of age; this thing is older than most of Europe.

    7. Re:Cut the guy some slack. by Snake_Plisken · · Score: 1

      My father is 72, and he is about the last person to ever fall for this kind of nonsense. Maybe something will magically happen on his next birthday...

      --

      Eat recycled food - it's good for the environment, and OK for you.
  64. Scam who? by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars, gave it to some one in a foreign country, and now he may go bankrupt.

    Why do I feel like the real idiots in this story were the people willing to lend him the money?

    -- this is not a .sig

    1. Re:Scam who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He took out cash advances on credit cards. It isn't all that hard to do that if you really want to.

    2. Re:Scam who? by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      He probably was quite reliable up to that point. But as age set in, and investments collapsed, he was willing to take risks. Stupid, idiotic risks. As someone else pointed out, he probably can't admit to himself that he's been scammed because if he did, his whole world view would collapse.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    3. Re:Scam who? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Why do I feel like the real idiots in this story were the people willing to lend him the money?

      Yes, because clearly banks should hesitate to loan a few thousand dollars to a man with over a third of a million dollars in independant cash, three cars and a south florida home.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  65. DEAR EDITOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    DEAR EDITOR

    REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS RELATION INVESTMENT IN YOUR COMPANY

    We do not receive slashdot in nigeria. Hence this proposal to you.
    We require from you subscriptions by fax. Please for security
    reasons my mobile number is 234-1-4706187 and fax 234-1-7748746.

    Thanks in anticipation and God bless.

    MRS. ASHATU ABACHA
  66. As P.T. Barnum said... by adept256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "There's a sucker born every minute."

    Spam relies on the idiot factor. Ask the same stupid question a few million times, you're going to get a few stupid answers.

    As long as there is one ignorant/plain stupid person managing to survive this world, there are ten people waiting in a queue to exploit them and take their money.

    Final obligatory quote: A fool and his money are soon parted.

    --

    I ran a benchmark on my quantum computer, now I can't find it anywhere!
  67. Obligatory 419 link by crimson30 · · Score: 1

    Check out some table-turning at 419 Eater.

  68. Re:Boo. Fucking. Hoo. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Why do you assume they are "dirt poor third worlders"? They could be, for all you know, the local gangsters who exploit the locals and corrupt the government. They could be far wealthier than their target.

    Don't sterotype all American's as "rich" (this guy sounded like your average retiree) or all third worlders as innocent poor lambs.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  69. Parasite to host ratio by Saeger · · Score: 1
    I remember reading (can't find the link) that the parasite to host ratio is fairly constant throughout ALL systems. Be it tapeworms, SCO/RAMBUS, welfare bums, or con artists, there will always be more parasites than "honest" hosts. But only the symbiotic parasites succeed, which spammers for example are not, because they're destroying email.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  70. Please everyone by niall2 · · Score: 1
    For the New Year send to everyone who you know the Scamorama link. Information (and some good laughter) is the only cure for this one.

    While your at it, giving the gift of Snopes can't hurt either.

    --
    Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
  71. But does he VOTE?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I know that relatively few people fall for these scams, but it does seem as if there is an inexhaustible supply of people willing to believe the con. What is the likelihood that people like Rupert Sessions regularly vote? Should we be trusting him, or anyone else who easily succumbs to an obvious scam and then blinds himself to reality, to operate our government?

    Oh wait. I'm a US citizen... never mind...

    1. Re:But does he VOTE?! by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      Of course he votes! This is why our own government runs a ponzi scheme called Social Security and another one called MediCare. Both of these programs are mathematical incongruities that were created to swindle elderly people into voting for the proponents (chiefly Democrats, but now Republicans have jumped on the bandwagon as well). They are promised financial "security" in their retirement years, paid for by the labor of their children, and low-cost "health care" insurance, also paid by their children and grandchildren.

      Anyone who runs the numbers knows that this structure will collapse on itself when the number of retirees and their financial entitlements grows to the point where it exceeds the number of workers paying into the system.

      As a poll worker for the past seven years, I've noted that the most reliable voters are the elderly, who are happy to vote for any politician who promises them more money or benefits, or any bond issue that will be paid for by future generations. They won't have to deal with the consequences, and they know it.

    2. Re:But does he VOTE?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does anyone have any bright ideas for increasing voter turnout among the 18-34 crowd? I fully accept that I am paying into a Social Security/MediCare bubble that will burst well before I can ever hope to draw on it 43 years from now - assuming they don't raise the minimum age again.

      By the time it finally does crash, I'll probably wish I had only invested in the dot-com bubble :)

  72. This may be harsh, but... by Courageous · · Score: 1

    ... honestly, the Nigerians earned every penny. More power to them.

    C//

  73. Can we actually Do something about this crap? by serutan · · Score: 1

    Has anybody thought about starting a project to track down these scammers with aggressive geek wizard techniques? Collecting a database of email headers strikes me as a good starting place, but I have no idea what would come next. Assuming you had unlimited computer power and a legion of volunteers willing to go out on a limb in terms of hacking/cracking, how would you go about identifying Nigerian Spam Scammers?

    1. Re:Can we actually Do something about this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't so much identification, it's prosecution. Police forces in Nigeria often can't deal with the sheer amount of crime, and if given this identification info they probably wouldn't even know what to do with it. Not to mention frequent corruption that would lead them to just ignoring it completely.

  74. What do you expected? by agoliveira · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm not feeling sorry for this guy.
    If he was robbed or lost the money on a fraudulent bank or something like that them he would be a victim but he was asked to help on an *ilegal* transaction and was his greed what moved him on.
    For me, he is accesory for this crime, not a victim.

    --
    Scientia est Potentia
  75. Not that funny by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Replace the Nigerian scammers with Christian pastors and the police as scientists and you have another perfect story.

    So before you laugh at him, please do reflect on yourselves...

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  76. That won't convince him... by John3 · · Score: 1

    But it is a funny site. I tried my hand at corresponding with the scammers for a while but it took way too much time. I thought these scams would die out, but maybe I should jump back into the fray.

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
  77. Woo Woo... NOT NEWS ... NERDS! by gmby · · Score: 0, Troll

    michael --

    Please stop falling for the Nigerian Spam posting...it's an old slashdot post that's time is over...

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  78. Yup by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From what I've seen of student loans, universities are more dangerous to the population at large than the Nigerian scammers are. I've seen people go into debt to the tune of 50-60K or more and then go into $20,000-$30,000 per year jobs. You're not buying your future with student loans, you're adding just one more chain that corporate America can use to make you a wage slave.

    Of course, that's just my opinion and I'm sure a lot of people have good, positive experiences with the studen loan people...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Yup by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Please, share some of those good positive experiences with me! I could use them against my student loan companies!

      Fortunately, I found out the scam behind that one before it was too late, and have almost paid mine off. But those people will hound you quicker than the electric company, or even the credit cards!

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    2. Re:Yup by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Informative

      for real. my cousins who make shitloads of money still have student load debts. It's crazy.

    3. Re:Yup by Elladan · · Score: 1

      It's often better financially to not pay them off.

      Creditors don't really count them against you like other debt, and the interest rates are microscopic. So if you're going to do something like buy a house, you're better off putting your money in the bank and making a minimum payment on the student loans so you can increase your down payment.

    4. Re:Yup by Elladan · · Score: 1

      I took out some student loans, and used them to protect my bank account (and my parents'). Result: I graduated, got a swanky ass job, and paid them off about three months after the grace period ended. I could have paid them off sooner.

      Total interest paid: <$100

      So, for less than a hundred bucks, I got to live the good life in college and not be completely broke all the time.

      Consider:

      Option A) You could pay now, when you're dirt poor, and later when you're rich you can puke at the sight of ramen.

      Option B) You could pay $100 later when you're rich, and now you can kick back, have a couple beers, eat decent food, and not worry about money too much.

      Yeah, B sounds pretty good.

      (Ok, that's not entirely correct, the loans came with a finance charge, so it was probably $100 + 2%, but whatever.)

      How's that for a positive experience?

      And the student loan people are about the friendliest creditors you can possibly imagine. I mean, you can actually just go to their web site and click a button basically marked, "lower my payments now."

      Try THAT with your bank.

      Plus, they periodically sent me notices saying, "Hey, we're feeling nice today, we lowered your interest rate permanently. Again."

      Not to mention the time or two when I got a notice in the mail while I was in school saying they'd just decided to turn my loan into a grant that quarter 'cause they found some money lying around in the back room and I had decent grades.

    5. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Not everyone who goes to college finishes.
      2. Not eveyone who finishes, gets a "swanky ass-job"
      the minute they graduate.
      3. Not everyone gets a 2% flat-rate loan.
      4. Not everyone's student loan actually pays them so well
      that they still aren't living on ramen.

      I'm happy for you, but your sure-fire strategy for success
      that worked for you, can be ruinous for others.

    6. Re:Yup by Elladan · · Score: 1

      1. Not everyone who goes to college finishes.

      It is unfortunate when people discover college is a bad choice after they've already started it. With or without student loans, you're out a lot of money. In fact, almost the same amount of money.

      2. Not eveyone who finishes, gets a "swanky ass-job" the minute they graduate.

      That's why there's a button on their web site that says, "Reduce my payments." You can select various options, including "income contingent" meaning you only pay what you can afford (and if you're really poor, they'll probably forgive the loan eventually).

      3. Not everyone gets a 2% flat-rate loan.

      Everyone who gets a federally guaranteed loan gets an insanely low rate, actually.

      The 2% is the finance charge for taking the loan.

      Typical student loans are 5-6% interest rate (or lower these days!), and the repayment period starts six months after you graduate or otherwise leave school.

      It's still a loan, but it's about the friendliest loan imaginable. Going to a school you can't (and will never) be able to afford is a bad idea regardless of loans, but if it's a question of starving now or having a light burden later, loans are a very good idea.

      Just go to a state school. Ivy league schools and the like don't make very good financial sense, and the education is hardly better. If your degree isn't vocational, it's probably a good idea to go to a school that's not too expensive, too. (For example, Harvard may be a good idea if you're getting a law degree, regardless of how poor you are. If you're majoring in comparative literature, you should make sure your daddy's rich first)

      4. Not everyone's student loan actually pays them so well that they still aren't living on ramen.

      The loans are calculated based on the cost of living and your current finances, so you should at least be able to upgrade to Mac'n'cheese. And considering that water is more expensive than gas, beer is probably a cost-saving measure.

      Lest you think my swank-ass job involves working for the student loan people, I make computers go "beep."

    7. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most people probably do end up in situation similar to what you describe. But if you're smart, you can avoid getting yourself into difficult situations, even if it's a university education. I got a Bachelors in CE in '99 and now am moving in on 6 figures. Within a year or so, I hope to reach that. Now, how much did 4 years of university education cost? 20K at the state school. I paid off my loans in less than a year after graduating. Here's proof that you don't have to sell your soul to get an education. Hard work smartly applied can be rewarding.

    8. Re:Yup by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, guy. If you spend a lot of money on college, and don't bust your ass, don't do your best and settle for the first thing that comes to you, yes, you are an idiot. It's not some "wage slave" conspiracy. Slavery is born out of deceit, coercion and greed, not ennui.

      I knew I was lazy, so I went to a cheap school. My loans'll be paid off by the time I go to grad school.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    9. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've seen people go into debt to the tune of 50-60K or more and then go into $20,000-$30,000 per year jobs.
      My EE degree cost maybe $25k, financed by a combination of loans, scholarships, in-state tuition, and several thousand dollars from my parents. I didn't get off my pathetically lazy butt and get a job until after I graduated. My total loan repayments (i.e., including interest) came to $19k.
      Of course, that's just my opinion and I'm sure a lot of people have good, positive experiences with the studen loan people...
      If you have a good "business plan" for paying back the loan using the degree, you're set. If you minimize the debt by getting in-state tuition and scholarships, the debt will be livable even if your chosen career flames out. If you borrow to spend seven years at Yale studying basket weaving, you deserve what you get.
  79. And Worse Yet by blunte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It said most of the 320k was new debt. There's no chance he can pay that debt back, as he can't even afford to pay current living expenses.

    That means he'll default on loans and credit card debt, which means creditors will have yet another reason to fleece good customers to make up for the bad ones.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
    1. Re:And Worse Yet by batura · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, it is the creditors responsibility to only grant credit to those that can afford it. The fact that they gave a guy the ability to borrow 320,000 without the chance to repay it is what makes me think about who the true dumbass is in this story: the bank. The guy will file for bankruptcy next week, and they'll (the banks) will be the ones paying for thier greed.

    2. Re:And Worse Yet by blunte · · Score: 1

      I didn't make any claims about who's the dumbass. I simply state that other paying debtors are the ones who will ultimately pay his debt.

      --
      .sigs are for post^Hers.
    3. Re:And Worse Yet by cornjones · · Score: 1

      You will be the one paying for their greed. (and me and everybody else at the bank) You don't think the 320k is coming out of the ceo's pay check, do you? it is sent right back to in in fees.

    4. Re:And Worse Yet by kialara · · Score: 0

      The banks are not allowed to discriminate over age, just like they can't discriminate over anything else.

      Interesting implications, hasn't it?

    5. Re:And Worse Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they can discriminate over how godawfully bad you've handled loans in the past.

  80. Bull by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "He is 73"

    So he had 73 years of life experience for him to know better.

    "He and his partially disabled wife needed the money"

    He had no problem burying his wife and himself in debt and putting everything they had in hock for the sake of a scheme that would have made Ralph Kramden (The Honeymooners) blush.

    "He comes from a simpler time, a different era"

    Bah, I hate that "Golden Age" bullshit. Life wasn't simpler and people act exactly the same as they always have. Some people are liars and cheats, some are greedy fools; time hasn't changed this. People even had fewer people watching out for them (bank insurance, auto insurance, consumer fraud protection, etc) than they do today.

    He grew up with Stalin, McCarthy, Hitler, the Depression, countless scams and scandals, and on and on. He wasn't from some innocent time.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Bull by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      Don't forget those micacle tonics that cured everything.

    2. Re:Bull by hey! · · Score: 1

      So he had 73 years of life experience for him to know better.

      My Mom was once one of the brightest people I knew. She grew up in the back woods in the Great Depression, but she was self-educated, a voracious reader and sharp as a tack. Then one day she started to buy crazy stuff from the Home Shopping Network. Not long after she got in her car to go to the senior center a few blocks away and ended up over a hundred miles from home when the state police called.

      It was Alzheimer's. Eventually she couldn't remember what happened a few hours before; she couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy. Eventually she got to the point where she couldn't swallow effectively anymore and got frequent respiratory infections as a result.

      Why am I bringing up Alzheimer's when this guy is not an Alzheimer's victim? Because Alzheimer's is one of any number of geriatric conditions, many of which involve dementia or reduced cognitive abilities.

      People age differently. At 73 most people have no obvious mental deterioration. But a significant fraction do have impaired critical thinking which is why elders are popular targets for scams. It's despicable.

      Elderly victims deserve sympathy and protection.


      Bah, I hate that "Golden Age" bullshit.


      I agree wholeheartedly. There is no justification in patronizing the elderly.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Bull by goon+america · · Score: 1
      So he had 73 years of life experience for him to know better.

      It is quite well documented that one's cognitive functions and ability to reason start to break down by this age for most people. It is in no way safe to assume that this man has not been affected by proccesses which have degraded his ability to think.

      Sure, we all know that one guy who's 89, still smarter than Niels Bohr, still wittier than Voltaire, etc. etc. That person is a statistical outlier. If anything exceptions are more salient because they are exceptional, but that is no excuse to ignore base rate statistics.

  81. You should RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anything, us young folks also have to share some of the blame in not spreading the message clearly that such things are scams.

    The message was shared with him, the POLICE told him it was a scam, he chose to ignore them.

  82. a friggin idiot and his $$ are soon parted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    title says it all. I especially like that he was a "electronics specialist". Christ you'd think he'd know better..

  83. Send them image files...fill their inbox by John3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People (including myself) have tried engaging the scammers in conversation to have some fun and possibly steer them down a dead end. However, these folks have far more time to devote than we do at creating these bogus stories.

    I've also heard of people replying and attaching image files so that they're mailbox quota gets used up. Most of the scammers are using free email services so it doesn't take much to fill their quota. I;ve done this a few times, choosing suitably bizarre images (nothing pornographic, just bizarre).

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Send them image files...fill their inbox by serutan · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about harassing them, I'm talking about identifying them in the real world through their online connections and turning them in to be arrested. Some kind of distributed tracking system. I would love to volunteer to help with such a project if somebody came up with a method of doing it.

    2. Re:Send them image files...fill their inbox by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Hehheh. Send them that image that the ACs always link to, with the explanation that you accidentally put your money in there...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  84. Don't - Re:Feel sorry for him by blunte · · Score: 1

    Since he's 73, he probably experienced the late end of the Great Depression, and thus, he should know that hard work is the way to success, or at least survival.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  85. The Scam is mutating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Perhaps news about the West African scam is getting out. I got the text below in an email earlier this week. Notice that it works the same way but claims to be German.
    Permit me to solicit your assistance on this transaction with you. My name is Hans Berger citizen of Germany, I am a staff of Deutsche bank in germany. As one of the auditors of the bank, I happen to find out that there is an unclaimed fund of 19.4M. in one of our customer account for more than ten years and our banking law stipulates that any unclaimed fund for more than 12 years will go into the bank revenue as an unclaimed fund. I and my colleagues have made our own personal inquiries about the depositor and the next of kin but sadly,the depositor and his entire family died in a plane crash in the year 1999. We solicit that you stand as the next of kin so that the money will be transfered to your account or any other account you may provide for us. We propose that the money be shared as follows 30% for you, 60% for my colleagues and I while 10% will be for any expences we may incure. I awaits your urgent reply while believing you do understand the confidential nature of this transaction. Best Regards, DAVID BECK.

    Notice that the guy assumes he can find people so stupid he can get away with calling himself Hans Berger in the text and David Beck at the end.

  86. Here is more money! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I'd like to talk to the folks who kept lending him money. The people who gave him an extra mortgage even though he had accumulated (according to the article) 16 credit cards, all of them maxed out. If he got the mortgage first then the credit card companies didn't care about their chances of getting paid back either.

    Seems like the lending rules in the US have gotten WAY too loose.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  87. If it looks like a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    troll and lives under a bridge eating billygoats, the guy responding to it is probably a sucker.

    Textbook excecution. And a brilliant example of why there should be a Troll +1 modderation. Antis0c, you, sir, are a magnificent bastard, and I salute you! You deserve a cookie!

  88. Why is this a scam, and televangelism not? by ColonelPanic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this guy had given all his money to a church, it wouldn't be in the news.

    --
    "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
    1. Re:Why is this a scam, and televangelism not? by kiolbasa · · Score: 1

      A church wouldn't promise him millions in return then not pay it.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    2. Re:Why is this a scam, and televangelism not? by echucker · · Score: 1

      No, but it might promise him a cure for his gout, and eternal salvation ;-P

    3. Re:Why is this a scam, and televangelism not? by m0RpHeus · · Score: 1

      Well... there are preachers that are scammers, but not all of 'em are. At least in my church everything is all accounted for and the books are open for all to see. At least we're sure where the money is going, wether it's really used for church activities (maintenance of facilities, feeding the hungry, medical missions stuff, etc).

      --
      Take-off every .sig! For Great Justice!
    4. Re:Why is this a scam, and televangelism not? by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

      Obviously, a church doesn't promise anything in return. If a televangelism guy was to promise returns such as the guy doing the Nigeria scam, it WOULD be a scam. And he would got into trouble for it.

      Sheesh, you people will do anything to make Christains look bad, won't you?

      --
      #include "sig.h"
  89. Are You Experienced? :P by blunte · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you speak from experience here.

    You've simply encountered the world of network marketing, where nearly everyone things they can get rich by paying for entry.

    The unfortunate reality is that network marketing (or MLM - multi-level marketing) requires as much or more work to be successful as traditional jobs do. They payoff is bigger, but the MLM industry is full of lame people you'd never want to associate with.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  90. perhaps by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or it's a tax on naivete`

    In this particular elderly gentlemans' case, it is probably a combination of that, and denial. It ain't just a river in egypt, folks, and it's a powerful ego defense when you've lost it all due to your own trust, and can't face the reality of your victimhood.

    Think that kind of denial can't be real? How hard do you think it is for that old fellow to look himself in the mirror and realize that his own foolishness cost he and his disabled wife their life savings and future?

    Truly a sad tale.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  91. Welcome to Florida by blunte · · Score: 1

    Remember Florida, land of the "chad"?

    Or Florida, land where they lose children of the state?

    It's really a shame to waste all that lovely climate on the residents of Florida.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  92. It's not that stupids *should* suffer... by ColonelPanic · · Score: 1

    ...it's just that stupidity tends to be its own punishment.

    --
    "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
  93. Don't be superficial by elpapacito · · Score: 1

    Remeber when you was a kid and you didn't know jack ? You probably now are an "adult" and think you know how to avoid being scammed ; you most definitely are a youngster with little experience if you considered that poor dude as "guilty of being stupid".

    He's ignorant and old, everybody is born ignorant and it's no one fault , also when you'll become older you'll see your brain will not work as well as it does now. The guilty party is _always_ the scammer, not the scammed. Fraudsters and scammers are _parasites_ , not because they don't work (injuried people can't work, yet they're not parasites)but because they only leech your money.

    Consider that: look again at your 401K, at the conditions of your bank account/credit card : do you think you know all the laws surrounding such everyday tools ? You don't. Do you think you understood all the implications of the contracts you signed ? You don't, unless you're an up-to-date lawyer.

    Scams should be always exposed, and recorded, and the structure of scams and how they work should be taught at every occasion, maybe even in schools.

    Do not invest in things you don't understand completely ; don't think you know everything.

  94. i got an e-mail... by bbdd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...from some other scammers demanding $699.

    the pitch was pretty much the same.

    "Today, everyone with an in-box has seen the pitch: A West African lawyer, banker or dignitary wants to get a huge stash of money out of the country. If the victim helps, he'll be cut in."

  95. but he signed up for a crime... by timelady · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the whole point of the 419s is the way they offer to rip off the current gvt of a country and smuggle cash out - usually impoverished economies.this guy thought his 'friends' werent 'criminals' when they offered him a chance to rip off a country? be real. telling everyone he intended to 'do good' with it - well, that makes it ok, does it? and ok, hes in his 70s. so is my dad - and boy, would he tell this guy he'd been a greedy sod. $320,000 - that would have kept him comfy. ignoring the police - thats just bloody minded. sorry, but my sympathy gland doesnt ignore his greed because of his age. aint no money for nuthin, peeps.

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
  96. Haha. You want funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He took out a second mortgage on his home in Florida. Since they can't take away his house in bankruptcy there, it's possible he'll ultimately turn a net profit on this scam.

    When all those banks are writing off that debt who do you think they'll turn to recover the loss? People who pay their fucking bills? Do YOU pay YOUR bills? I think I'm begining to get an idea about who the real suckers are here.

    Nigeria should be nuked on principle, and he should be incinerated and his ashes used in the vitrification of nuclear waste generated by the nuking of Nigeria.

    Aha ha...wait, it's not fucking funny.

  97. Is that all? by pherris · · Score: 1
    the target ... lost $320,000 ...

    Is that all? I've got a friend who lost three times that on the "dot bomb" crash. Now that was a real scam. A few key scammers with the investment companies skimming off the top. The Nigerians have nothing on Wall Street.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  98. What would be amusing by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is if this actually was true, and there was a rich, confused, Nigerian out there wondering why 100,000,000 English speakers so far have refused his request to make them rich. It's just begging to be made into a wacky sitcom.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
    1. Re:What would be amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Esenam Ayele?

  99. The parent is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fer crissakes ....

  100. Re:Why was it marked flamebait? by AWhistler · · Score: 1

    And in the words of despair.com, paraphrased, you also miss 99% of the shots you do take.

  101. I Heard Tell of One by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Evil rumor suggest that a lawyer would travel with a charitable organization that visits elderly people on a regular basis. Said lawyer would establish a brief relationship with said elderly people, get to know them, then go to a judge and have them ruled incompetant, having their assets transferred to the lawyer for administration and the elderly people placed in a home.

    All complete rumor of course, but much more insidious than the Nigerians, if it were true.

    Another common one up north involved selling the elderly people upgrades on their house that they really didn't need. Again, much easier to fall for than anything the Nigerians put forth.

    A common theme here is the elderly, and can you blame the old folks? Society as a whole seems to just rather they die when they're supposed to and stop clogging up the works for everyone else. Why is social security and medicare on the ropes? Because the government bets that all those people are going to die and they're stubbornly not doing so. How many people have cursed being forced into going to see grandma over the holidays because she tells the same boring story over and over again? Grandma's going to have the last laugh, though, and live to be 130.

    Maybe if we made our elderly relatives more part of our lives and gave them new memories to talk about, they'd be less boring, more lively, more productive to society and less likely to open up to anyone who will talk to them because they're so starved for human contact that they can't tell a friend from someone who means them harm. Or maybe I'm just talking out my ass here. Most of my elderly relatives died when they were supposed to like model citizens.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:I Heard Tell of One by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Grandma's going to have the last laugh, though, and live to be 130.

      And she'll laugh even harder when nanotechnologies allow her to rejuvenate her body and become immortal. Mental age: 130; Biological age: ~28. That's one "experienced" older woman! (did I really just say that?).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:I Heard Tell of One by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Hey! Stop looking at grandma that way!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  102. Denial by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    There is an elderly lady in my community who has been giving money to the Nigerians for years. She is so far gone that she gets vehemently angry when people tell her that she is being scammed (this includes a personal visit from the FBI) She has lost almost everything she owns and she still keeps giving in the hopes that "God will sort everything out." There comes a point when accepting the truth is more humiliating than losing everything you own... which is a pretty harsh bit of reality for this lady. Her car has broken down and she has no way to fix it.. She now walks everywhere in the dead of winter. Before you bash her with "she deserved it" remarks.. try not to judge her to harshly because in her heart she was just trying to help people.

  103. Good. Morons deserve it. by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Um, first off.

    "I will have a million dollars but I need you to give me 10000$ so I can process some forms."

    People who don't see problems with this probably buy from spammers. They deserve each other [note I'm not saying the scammer is right. They should die at the hands of a hungry tiger too].

    I mean if it's 100% sure that I will get a million dollars I'll get a loan at 30% or whatever and pay it off before too much interest accumulates [e.g. do it quick even with a penalty it can't be that much].

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  104. Pop quiz by Rogerborg · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How many of you guys sitting there feeling smug about your healthy cynicism actually believed this article absolutely, without checking a single fact, simply because it told you what you wanted to hear?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Pop quiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What am I to lose sitting here and believing this article? It doesn't affect me in any more way than giving some experience what happened to someone else. Reading this article is mostly "passive" and noone demands anything from me regarding to it.

      As soon as someone approached me with demands the scam detector would kick in.

      You have a point, though. I don't know for sure that this guy even exists, right. If, in fact, he doesn't, then I haven't lost anything. If he does, then I just gained scam-detector-fuel.

    2. Re:Pop quiz by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      I didn't believe the article absolutely. Then again, I didn't read it, but hey, that's how things are done around here...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  105. What??? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    1991, eh?

    that was 12 years ago.

    He is 73 years old.

    How you equate that to "nearly the same" is beyond reason.

    The internet DID have something to do with it, as he received it over the internet.

    He was greedy... yay. So are you, so is everyone else. Maybe not in this situation, but it's concievable that when you are 70, there will be some scam going on you will not recognize as one, even if it's obvious to those who are 50 years younger than you.

    1. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fucking police said it was a SCAM

    2. Re:What??? by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      The point is, it's been around longer than he has been on the internet, and the scam has been around longer than he has in faxes and mail, but you conveniently neglected to respond to that point.

      You don't need to be aware of the scam itself to have not fallen for this, either. Most people will receive some type of consultation from a trusted person before dumping tens of thousands of dollars into an "investment" like this. Then there are idiots, like this guy, who happens to be old.

      Fuck him, I say.

      Chris

    3. Re:What??? by Random832 · · Score: 1

      though the oldest reference GPP could find was 1991, snopes dates the "spanish prisoner" scam at least as far back as the 1920s. that's more than 73 years

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  106. Re:Boo. Fucking. Hoo. by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Given the details of the story, they have a fairly elaborate set-up going, with at least some access to large houses, and a number of people who can at least pose as, and probably are armed guards.

    --

    That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

  107. just plain dumb by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    This guy must have had sucker written on his
    face. Good grief! Either that, or he was
    extremely greedy

  108. The root of the problem... by X86Daddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is that people aren't encouraged to use critical thinking skills. As children, asking why too many times or spotting inconsistencies in explainations is often frowned upon. As adults, questioning your employer is an example of not "being a team player," while questioning your government is "unpatriotic." At any time, questioning an organized religion is usually branded "heretical."

    Trust is a good thing. Common sense is good too, but not encouraged as much. Just imagine a world where everyone had plenty of the latter.

    1. Re:The root of the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohh you need to have faith.

    2. Re:The root of the problem... by iso · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the truth! If you need any proof of this just look at the number of religious people in America. What a sad state.

  109. Talk about gullible ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... he probably believed the administration when they told him there were WMD in Iraq :)

  110. And not all debt is bad by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A house is an asset. All things being equal, it will appreciate over time, and unlike an apartment, your money isn't just being dumped into someone else's pocket.

    I'm currently in more debt than I've ever been. I have $100,000 outstanding on a house I got. Before this, I'd never been in debt more than $1000. However, that doesn't mean I'm hurting in a bad way, on the contrary, my mortgage payments are LESS than my rent was, I have one more roomate so I'm paying even less, and now only 5% of what I pay goes to someone else, instead of all of it when I lived in an apartment.

    1. Re:And not all debt is bad by Frisky070802 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm currently in more debt than I've ever been. I have $100,000 outstanding on a house I got....

      Assuming your house is worth more than you owe on it, I don't know that this is truly "debt" in the same sense as someone who owes credit card issuers. A debt that is secured by an asset is a completely different animal.

      So right, not all "debt" is bad. But neither would I call you in debt over a mortgage. Our friendly scam victim is not only in debt, he's in the doghouse and all that brown stuff that lies around outside that doghouse.

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    2. Re:And not all debt is bad by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      only 5% of what I pay goes to someone else

      Better check your math. Perhaps you have a 5% loan, but that's on the BALANCE, not on the payment. Didn't you read the truth in lending statement that you got when you bought the place? If you had, you'd see that you're paying several times the loan over by the time you're done. With $100K balance, I assure you that you're paying more than 5% to someone else.

    3. Re:And not all debt is bad by thelenm · · Score: 1

      now only 5% of what I pay goes to someone else

      Dude, you must have gotten one heck of an interest rate. I got a good one myself, and the interest portion of my mortgage payment is easily 80% of the payment. Maybe your interest rate is 5%? (which would not mean, of course, that only 5% of your payment goes to the lender as interest)

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  111. Scammers Scammed by RevDigger · · Score: 1

    If you'd like to see a little justice against these scammers, you must check out:

    http://www.419fun.com/phillipepage1.htm

    Warning: it's crap-your-pants funny

    - H

  112. 2 Phrases... by Necrobruiser · · Score: 1

    come to mind.
    "You can't cheat an honest man" and "It's a miracle a fool and his money ever got together in the first place."

    --
    "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
  113. Makes sense by ncc74656 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Considering that these are the same people who can't figure out how to properly use a punch-card ballot, is it at all surprising that they'd get taken for a ride by Nigerian scammers?

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    1. Re:Makes sense by ads.osdn.com.blocked · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power today, not in prison... And thousands of American troops, aid workers, and innocent civilians would still be alive"

      --

      public final transient String president = DUBYA;
  114. Re:Boo. Fucking. Hoo. by keeboo · · Score: 0

    "third worlders"?

    wow.. that's a very nice word to use..
    not only is puts millions being like 2nd-class people, but also it generalise several countries as being the same thing.

  115. I fell for a scam too. by Chainsaw+Messiah · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can sympathize with this guy. I fell for a scam too that promised to let me retire in comfort. I don't know how they got my name either. I'm still paying for it today and I'm sure the rest of my life. I'm having 7.5% deducted from every paycheck because of it. Just watch out for these scammers, this group calls themselves "Social Security". I don't know if they're from Nigeria or not though.

    1. Re:I fell for a scam too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What really sucks, pal, is that there is no way to opt out of that pyramid scheme.

  116. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his organs could be sold to cover the debt?

    Of course the brain would not be suitable for transplant.

  117. You are too smart to get taken! by hexatron · · Score: 1

    I see that almost all the responders here are much too smart to be ever be scammed. Scammers know that such smarties should be avoided at all costs. Yeah, right.
    The very first step in any scam, before the scammer even makes contact, is the belief by the sucker that he is somehow too (smart, good, honest, knowledgeable-about-people, or whatever) to be taken. Have you ever paid too much or been paid too little, and made excuses for how it 'wasn't my fault' or 'actually, the deal was not bad' or any of a hundred other rationalizations?
    So remember, O wise ones--people with your qualifications have been shown to be born only once each sixty seconds.

  118. You can always have fun with them. by karmaflux · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of my friends is currently screwing around with these morons.
    Heheheh.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  119. It doesn't break my heart. by khasim · · Score: 1

    If the guy was retarded or something, that would be different.

    Even now, even after the cops showed him the "black money" scam was SEVENTY YEARS OLD (he's only 72 years old), he STILL cannot accept the facts.

    I might make a mistake by investing in Enron. But I would NOT mortgage the house, get more credit cards and run up massive debt to buy more Enron stock once I heard that Enron was having financial problems.

    That is the difference between that guy and myself.

    He could only see the money he was being offered. His greed blinded him. That isn't heartbreaking.

  120. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This man has an amazing sense of humor!

  121. Supervise Wire Transfers by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Couldn't the Secret Service (FBI... whatever) halt wire large wire transfers over say $10,000k to African bank accounts? Maybe they already are. Canadian and American banks are already doing this to domestic transfers to make sure its not "drug money". I would think large overseas transfers would undergo the same scrutiny.
    Maybe it wouldn't have worked in this case. Assuming the scammers are all rotating around using the same bank account numbers, I would hope all wire transfers to those accounts could be stopped. It might save a few people from getting scammed. It might also save a few retiree pensions. Look at it this way - he could have spent the money in the U.S. and now its all in some criminal's pocket in Africa.

    Just because he's 73 and has "all that life experience" doesn't mean that he is still able to make clear descisions. Mental and cognitive capabilities decline with age.

    The guy was an electronics specialist with over 300K in retirement savings. He's obviously a pretty smart guy and was able to save up a considerable amount.

  122. Wife, children, friends? by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe it is deteriorating mental faculties.

    But his wife couldn't stop him? Does she have the same problem?

    Do they have children? Couldn't the children stop him?

    Friends? Do they have any friends? Are they all affected with the same deterioration?

    Even after he is shown the "black money" scam is fake, he STILL believes that they were legit.

    I notice they don't talk to his wife about it.

    1. Re:Wife, children, friends? by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      Oddly enough, I have a father-in-law who regularly falls for one particular scam artist. This guy gets in touch with him every so often and convinces him into a new "business opputinity". I found out about this because, a recent scam involved him faxing some "materials" to someone else and he needed to use my fax machine. He was very secretive about what it was about and that only peaked my interest, after pressing him for details, I found out that it was some modified pyrimid scheme and started to explain to him as much. He started to get really defensive, and offended, I dropped it.

      I brought it up with his wife and my wife, and they told me his "history" with this scam artist, and said that they let him "as long as he doesn't send too much money." They went on to tell me that this guy drives a nice car and aways talks about the money that he is making on this "project" or that "business". I don't think that my father-in-law believes that the guy is legit, he (may) just think that sooner or later he get in with the right scam. Just like the guy in the story:

      Instead, he blamed -- and still blames -- corrupt government officials. If only they paid off the right people, he thought, the money would be released.
      He knew that he had no claim to the money. He just felt that if he delt with these "shaddy" characters in the right manner, he would get money. I am sure that his family and friends (if he has any) told him that it was a scam, but he just didn't want to listen.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  123. Mod parent up. by khasim · · Score: 1

    Accidents happen and can be very tragic. I have empathy for victims.

    This was pure greed from someone who STILL cannot accept that he was wrong. Even after he is shown the evidence and examples of other people who were taken with the same scams.

  124. [OT] Re:It's not a scam by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting
    However, that fact alone does not make it a good bet, because the variance overwhelms the positive expectation

    That reminds me of a question. Might make an interesting Slashdot poll. Suppose you've won a free drawing. You have your choice of the following prizes, each of which has an expected value of $1. Which do you take?

    • $1
    • A random chance at $2, with a probability of 1/2 of winning
    • A random chance at $4, with a probabilty of 1/4 of winning
    • A random chance of $8, with a probability of 1/8 of winning
    • ...
    • A random chance of $4294967296, with a probabilty of 1/4294967296 of winning.
    1. Re:[OT] Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting... i'd toss out the 4 and 8 dollars, and break it down to 1, 2, and "bill gates"

      since it was free, you lose nothing by going for billy, but you have an incredibly small chance of winning.

      personally, I'd take the $1 because its a guranteed return on zero investment. but I've also never purchased a lottery ticket or even a scratch-off card. although some lady at work yesterday showed us a $201 winner, and another coworker told me of 3 occasions of winning $500 (she buys a lot apparently)

    2. Re:[OT] Re:It's not a scam by aastanna · · Score: 5, Funny

      So who's the bigger geek, you for using 2^32 as an example of a really big number, or me for knowing that 4294967296 = 2^32?

      sigh

    3. Re:[OT] Re:It's not a scam by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      A test like that is used quite often in social sciences, including economics. There was a recent study which proved that men who look at sexy women become dumber. They used a test similar to yours (although the purpose was different and the expected value was not equal in this study).

      Anyway, I think your test can be used to determine how risk-averse someone is. To make it more accurate, you should increase the base value from $1 to say $10,000. That way the lower outcomes are valued well. So my answer would be:

      In the $1 case that you presented, I would pick one with probably $200,000+ outcome. I always consider $200,000 to be a good number. But it would depend on the probability (I'm not sure how small the probability is at that point). I would ignore anything less than 30% probability.

      If the minimum value was something like $10,000, I would pick the $10,000 one. I'm risk averse and poor/unemployed so guaranteed income is important. If I was employed had a salary of $50,000+, I would pick something else (proably more like the $200,000 outcome or something--depends on probability).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    4. Re:[OT] Re:It's not a scam by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      Neither. Try giving out that as a phone number at Radio Shack or any retailer that wants your personal info.

  125. get ready for more of these scams by agwis · · Score: 1

    cause once the wrong (or right, depending upon what angle your looking from) people read this it will just further confirm how many stupid, gullible people there are to be had out there.

    I don't feel sorry for this guy at all. I've seen gamblers in denial that blame any and everything else for the consequences of their actions. He is no different. They refuse to believe that it was a mistake and it's always something or someone else's fault. How many times have you seen a guy losing his shirt at the blackjack table, and the whole time blaming it on the actions of the anchor?! They take the risks and when things go bad they get to the point where they only hope they can just win their money back...which probably explains why he kept giving the scammers more. I believe that deep down this guy knows he's been taken but he's still holding on to the slightest possibility that the money will come through. The other alternative is to admit he's been scammed because of his greed and to face the shame and embarrasment of it all.

    The worst part for everyone else is that this is more fuel for the fire. I imagine we can all expect more scam spam in the future now. *sigh*

    -Pat

  126. The lord works in mysterious ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the fellow in Africa is thanking god for this guy.

    This reminds me of the Joke about a man stranded on a roof during a flood and he keeps turning down offers to rescue him from the roof by a boat, canoe and helicopter, insisting that the lord will see him through. When he dies and meets god he says god why didn't you save me? The lord replies I sent a boat, a canoe, and a helicopter what was your problem ?

  127. two words by bani · · Score: 1

    "cognitive dissonance"

  128. He's not kidding! by hexatron · · Score: 1

    Remove your pants before reading http://www.419fun.com/phillipepage1.htm . You have been warned.

  129. SUMMARY: 419 scammers are more profitable than SCO by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

    and i respect the 419er's business model infinitely more.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  130. * for Dummies by pkinetics · · Score: 1
    Someone needs to make a book called Scamming for Dummies, on how to fleece stupid people.

    Someone else needs to make a book called Scams for Dummies, which identifies all the scams.

  131. Right, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    * wimpy people deserve to be beaten up
    * ugly people deserve to be ridiculed
    * promiscuous people deserve to be raped

    ad infinitum. What a lovely world you're living in!

  132. I wouldn't be so smug. by hey! · · Score: 1

    We're all headed there to some degree.

    Ever wonder why old folks are particular targets and frequent victims of scams? It's not like all of sudden sixty years ago or so people started getting smart. As our brains and bodies age, our cognitive abilities change.

    If you expect to live into your eighties or even nineties, you can expect that your mind won't be 100% of what it used to be. Maybe in some ways it'll work better, but you may also find yourself on the wrong end of a scam yourself.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  133. The scammed guy reminds me of a song by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

    From the outtakes of Austin Powers 3, to the tune of "Old McDonald Had A Farm"

    "F.R.I.C.K.I.N
    I.D.I.O.T!
    With a frick frick here
    a frick frich there
    here a frick, there a frick
    everywhere a frick frick

    Albert Gore had a network
    filled with...frick, in idioooooots..."

  134. Evolution... by DrCode · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, it's not "evolution in action", since the man and his wife are well beyond child-bearing.

  135. I know PPL associates by dh003i · · Score: 1

    Some very respectable people, and one friend of mine suggested I think about becoming an associate. But it's a lot of money to put in (you buy the associateship and then all the advertising materials) and the statistics presented are fluffed (e.g., they say that they have an 85% retention rate of customers, but that's only for one year...after one year, it drops to less than 30%). In short, the whole thing just seems like a headache and a mess.

  136. Nigerians and Slashdot by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    My first post to the front page of Slashdot, I used a unique email address. Within several hours, the first spam arrived at that address. It was a Nigerian scam. I verified its origin with a whois. Other spam didn't arrive until days later. Boy those guys are fast.

    It's both saddening and humorous to hear of people falling for those scams. From reading the article it sounds like he'd still give them more money if he had it. "Give me a few hundred thousand and then I'll give you 20 million. Just trust me, old buddy, old pal. I'm upset to hear you still consider me a stranger, after all this time. Have a little faith."

  137. Example of a scam in operation by eagle486 · · Score: 1
    Here is a website for some other Nigerian scammers.

    http://www.unitrustfin.net/

    I have reported it to the cops, but they don't seem to care.

    1. Re:Example of a scam in operation by alecto · · Score: 1

      This kind of scam probably serves the greater purposes of law enforcement. Think about it--if some middle class folk try to play the games of the rich by hiding assets overseas, the word gets out that "all those offshore banks are scams," and the taxes keep rolling in. Meanwhile, the truly rich keep their money in Switzerland and the Cayman Islands.

    2. Re:Example of a scam in operation by eagle486 · · Score: 1

      This one is not an offshore scam, it IS the Nigerian scam. They use a fake bank website to prove to the victim that the money is in the account.

    3. Re:Example of a scam in operation by alecto · · Score: 1
      Ah. Guess I didn't dig deep enough in the site. Shame everyone doesn't know to be suspicious of a "bank" using shared hosting :).

      Merry Christmas!

  138. SO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what? Pay the balance monthly. If you got over your head and cannot pay the balance, you get what you deserve.

    Me? I don't even know the interest rate is on my credit card. It could be one million percent for all I care.

    1. Re:SO? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      It's not much of a credit card then, is it ?

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:SO? by unborn · · Score: 1

      It is in two ways:
      1) Gives you a 30-day buffer to find money without paying any interest
      2) Reflects positively on your CREDIT history, which may help you get a loan, which makes much more sense than paying high interests to the credit card company.

    3. Re:SO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? Pay the balance monthly. If you got over your head and cannot pay the balance, you get what you deserve.

      Yeah, I got what I deserve. Goddamn my stupidity for getting in over my head with my dad's sudden death and my uninsured sister getting cancer, wasting away, and dying herself.

      Jesus, what a fuckhead you are.

    4. Re:SO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it is. He doesn't pay the money before using it. He pays it after using it. He just pays it before interest comes into the picture.

  139. Re: Why lottery is different. by andersa · · Score: 0

    You are missing some important points here.

    First you can easily affort the few dollars out of you payroll each week for the chance of winning the first price. The lottery is not out to ruin you.

    If you loose, you are not really any worse off than if you hadn't played at all, but if you win you are significantly better off than you were.

    If you don't play, your chance of winning is infinitely smaller. (They are nil.)

    Nobody is scamming you in a lottery. Your chances of winning are minute, but everybody knows this.

  140. "well-spoken West Africans"? by lavaface · · Score: 1

    heh.

  141. Typical Stockhold Syndrome by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    It's the same thing that happens with kidnap victims... they end up on their captor's side...

    Truly sad, but I have a hard time feeling sorry for the guy....

  142. Great example of endless scam potential by soloport · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uh, you'd better check your math. There's much more than 5% going to someone else. Try more like 100-200% of the present value of your home.

    Try this out: Multiply your monthly payment times 360 (the number of payments per year, times 30 years -- the typical home loan term). Now divide that amount by the amount you owe the bank. Should be 2.3, more or less, or 230%. And since, on payment, you'll have bought and own 100% out of that 230%, the amount you'll be paying someone else for the privilege is around 130%!

    See? Isn't *compound* interest fun? That 5% is not "simple" interest, after all.

    It is a good thing you're monthly payments are lower, though. Now you have more "disposable" income to buy, er..., disposables.

    1. Re:Great example of endless scam potential by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      I mistyped, should have been 50%. My total payment will be around 150% of my inital loan (it's not a 30 year loan). However either way, the point is I'm putting money towards it, rather than towards nothing. I gain nothing form the 4 years of rent I paid, I do gain something from the mortgage I'm paying.

    2. Re:Great example of endless scam potential by mlyle · · Score: 1

      When you adjust for the time value of money, though, it's not nearly so bad, and the fact that the mortgage is tax deductible..

      Say he's paying 6% on that home loan, and he's in a 35% total tax bracket. That makes his effective interest rate 3.9%. After inflation, that makes the amount of interest he's paying around 2% effectively. Over the life of the loan, that results in about a 33% premium that he pays the bank over the value of the home. Not a bad deal, all in all, when you also get the house to live in, in the meantime (eliminating the need to pay rent). All in all, mortgages right now are an especially good deal. The numbers I used are conservative, too. Many people pay more in total tax than 35%, and we'll be lucky if inflation stays around 2% for the next 30 years.

    3. Re:Great example of endless scam potential by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1
      Lest we forget the basic business practice of leveraging someone elses money. The whole idea is that that 5% is a very small price to pay (depending on where you bought your home). I'm too lazy to do the math...but as a somewhat tongue-in-cheek example: Lets say that you buy a home for $100,000.00 with a 3% down mortgage at 5.75% interest. Your down payment with closing costs would be approximately $5,500.00. Now for your $5,500 dollar invest ment you accomplish several things. In my area (Pinellas County Florida) property is appreciating at approximately 8% per year. 5.75% goes to the mortgagee, the other 2.25% goes to you. You're already in the clear and making a return on your investment. Now, add to that the fact that you can write off the interest portion of your loan on your income taxes and the fact that you can claim (in Florida) a $25,000.00 homestead exemption on your taxes for your primary residence and you are coming out smelling like a rose. Now you are only paying about $580 bucks for your mortgage every month (average rent in my area is about $750.00 a month), add about $100.00 a month for property taxes and another $50.00 a month for homeowners insurance (provided you are not in a flood zone) and you are are coming out $20.00 a month ahead of the game over rent in addition to the above mentioned benefits. Now it gets tricky...20 bucks a month ain't a lot, but it comes to $240.00 for the year. factoring that into your initial investment of $5,500.00 for the home thats an additional 4% simple interest and change you can add on to the income of that initial $5,500 investment. Also, the 8% per year appreciation is not 8% per year of the $100,000.00...it is first year: 100,000 * 8%, second year..108,000 * 8%, third year...116,640 * 8%

      Yes, I'm sure there may be a few things I may be off on by a bit, especially when I'm unwilling to calculate all the numbers at the moment, but hell....it really is a losing situation to be in when you pay rent to someone.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    4. Re:Great example of endless scam potential by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      However making a financial-type decision based on the assumption that current tax advantages would persist indefinitely is a recipe for disaster. The tax code can change at any time and you effectively have no recourse in that case.

      Consider the case of the real estate limited partnerships and the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

    5. Re:Great example of endless scam potential by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 1

      Here's an example of how a similar situation might NOT work out:

      Buy a house for $100,000 with 10% down (downpayment plus closing costs) at 5.75% , then experience a -8% deflation in housing prices for two years (rural area in down economy, buyer's market), then lose your job and have to sell your house fast (since you can't affort the house payment long without a job) so you lose another 10% or so, so you wind up, oh, owing more money then then your house sells for so you owe money at closing (money which you may not even have!), plus you are out of the 10 grand downpayment.

      Now add in the possibility that you can't even deduct your mortgage interest because you don't have more deductions then your standard deduction...

      And yes, there are some areas of the country where this is a realistic portrayal of the economic situation - parts of the Midwest and New England are a couple places I am aware of.

      --
      I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
  143. Sessions as Murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The account had been dormant for years -- ever since the businessman and his family died in a plane crash, the e-mail read. The "banker" needed help moving the money. Otherwise, the government would confiscate it.

    Imagine for a moment that the situation was not a hoax, and that there was even some legal 'grey area' that made the transaction legal.

    How does some some three-car owning, middle class American decide that he has more right to benefit from a deceased estate than the legaly constituted government of a country?

    Even if 90% of the hypothetical windfall was to end up in corrupt polititians pockets, the remaining ammount - used in a food program for example - could make the difference between life and death for the empoverished of some third world country.

    Apart from Sessions obvious greed, there's a greater lack of morals evidenced here. For some reason the parallel that springs to mind is pasive complicity of some with the Nazi holocaust.

    Sessions deserves all he got ...

    DB

  144. Well that's a rather different scam by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I have sympathy for people like you that get scammed with something that seems legit. Hell, I know people who were full time employees for a company for a year that went bust and then refused to pay them their final month's saliry.... while giving all the execs a parting bonus.

    These 419 scams are really different. They are OBVIOUSLY scams. More to the point, they are well documented. Also, in this case, even if he hadn't heard of them, the police specifically told him it was a scam. That is really different.

    IF someone gets scammed by something that looks quite legit and such, then I have sympathy for them. However getting scammed by some get rich quick scheme, you basically got what you deserved.

    1. Re:Well that's a rather different scam by sagefire.org · · Score: 1

      Well, you'll love this. They were using my trainings to dupe other people into paying a training fee. So, I got tricked out of my wages and other people got duped out of $100 a pop in training fees for non-existant classes.

  145. It is not news... by bicho · · Score: 1

    ... it is a well designed scam.
    next thing you will know is a lot of people receiving an emeil from that guy asking for monetary help to recover himself from a scam.

    He will argue that this could have happened to you.

    ok... bad taste joke, maybe.

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  146. Or we could all get the scammers back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing the 419 scams here, I started my own site, but ran out of ideas. bastards it gets old after a while because there are tons of them and they all send you the same variation on the scam. If enough people started answering these and wasting the scammers time, it's going to get a lot more costly to persue possible marks. Just a thought.

  147. Good. I'm glad he got ripped off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 73 year old man with 300,000. Who gives it away to spammers. Sounds like my senile dad. my mom always had to deal with the money cause he's a braindead fucking idiot. I just dont' understand how he could have built up 300,000 dollars. Oh well, I don't feel sorry for anyone that has ever had a 300,000 dollar bank account. I fucking wish.

  148. 3 inch stack? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    It's little things he says while leafing through the 3-inch stack of e-mails.

    Hmm... on my screen about 5 emails take up around an inch, so I gather they mean 15 emails.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  149. Keep the elderly off the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At some point, people are just too old to handle the barrage of scams and advertisement on the internet.
    This man, I'm going to assume, is too old to know any better - the senile are easily scammed by a well-spoken con artist. Happens all the time.
    Keep 'em off the internet.

  150. Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply Greed

  151. Yes, Re:It's not a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spare a thought for the 'scamsters' who would have sent hundreds of mails everyday, withouth really expecting anyone to fall for the trick. It was sheer belief in themselves that, finally, one day bore them the fruit pf their continued persistence.
    Defnitely doesnt seem to be a scam to me.
    Oh, and the man who lost his money? I'd say he'd have lost it anyway (if he could lose it in this scam)

  152. No not the darwin awards sadly. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In order to qualify you have to somehow remove yourselve from the gene pool. Since he is 70 already he prob is beyong reproduction and likely has already reproduced. So unless he has to sell his kids for their organs his genes have spread.

    I should be more sympathetic? Fuck that. This guy is a criminal. He funded the bribing of officials all in an attempt to defraud a foreign goverment for nothing else then pure financial gain. Rule 1 of being a criminal be aware of bigger criminals. Oh well no doubt a lot of other idiots will help this sucker out proving to him that god exists and that it is goverments who seek to screw people over. God bless america.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  153. We are cynical you are gullible. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Speaking of wich. I got an uncle who died and left 21 billion dollars and now the goverment wants it all unless we can somehow swindle them out of it. I need about a quarter million to set it up. Intressted?

    Yeah he wanted to do good with the money. Oh sure. I think we found the one person more stupid then sessions. It is you.

    He had 250.000 dollars and apparently could raise even more. I hardly see that as being poor or being unable to pay the bills. No he wanted it all because he was a greedy bastard. If he had wanted to good he could have sold his cars before kept a cheap little runabout and used to money to fund a local charity. No need to steal 21 billion dollars. Don't be a sucker youreselve he is scamming you just as he wanted to scam the Nigerian goverment.

    You see his fault his not being stupid. His fault is thinking that he was smarter then everyone else. Even know he doesn't believe the police because he believes he is smarter then they are.

    That is the secret to avoid being scammed wether it is classic stuff like this or more subtle stuff like cheap loans, buying girls gifts, advertising. Ask yourselve this. Am I the smartest person in this deal? No? Then stay away.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  154. Capitalism at it's finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Greed is good. It's what makes our economy work. Produce something, ANYTHING, then sell it for as much as the market will bear, as much as you can get away with. It's OK because someone will come along and sell it cheaper eventually. If you don't then you don't get your share of the pie. No health care, no peace of mind, no respect.

    That's what every schoolkid in this sick culture has driven into their head. It's why we have the world's highest crime rate. It's why there are hundreds of assholes attacking the victim here, who may very well be senile, instead of the scumbags who perpetrated the scam.

    "Oh," cry the assholes, "but look at all the stuff we have now, courtesy of capitalism. People can eat, miraculous breakthroughs in medical technology" blah blah...we're being sped along at breakneck speed into a world of designer bio-weapons and suitcase nukes, filled with scumbags obsessed with speedboats and lambourghinis.

    Reminds me of the old joke about the guy who jumped out of a building..."So far so good!".

  155. 419 eater by swanky · · Score: 4, Informative

    The grass isn't necessarily greener on the other side of the fence

    http://www.419eater.com/index.htm

  156. The Next Nigerian Scam... by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 1

    I know it is too late to post a comment on this thread, but here's an idea about the next Nigerian scam...

    Dear Friend,

    I have been a victim of the famous Nigerian scam. I was promised 21 million dollars in return for helping poor Mr X and Mr Y get their ancestral money out of Nigeria, and ended up giving money to scamsters. I have lost everything, house, cars, bank accounts and am badly in debt. I am desperately looking for help. I never intend to fall for such scam again, and request your help in getting back on feet. Please help me by sending .....

    Regards,
    XXXX

  157. EMP? by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    Why don't we just EMP the whole of Nigeria, so we can flood the media with stories saying Nigeria has been EMPed, so computers in Nigeria don't work, so those email scams are fake?

  158. Awh, you are breaking my heart here by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Well no not really. This is not like some poor old biddy who gets scammed into paying for needless repairs or whose house is burgled at the back while they help someone at the frontdoor.

    These people are doing normal legal even very nice things, like assisting 1 of the frauders while the other wanders around the house to steal stuff. The scumbags that do this rely on most peoples trust that if someone tells you your house needs to be fixed that they are not lying. Do you check your garage for every repair? You also presume that if someone asks you for help that they don't have someone in the back breaking in.

    This guy was asked to help in a fraud and he let greed suck him in. He is blaming the goverment of nigeria for not just giving him 21 billion. Doesn't he even realise that in a country like that it is probably several times the countries income?

    Oh and as for admitting he was scammed. Those old people who are really scammed have no trouble at all admitting it and LISTEN to the police when they come around. In england they did even help in sting operations of their own where they waited for the scammers to come back only now there were coppers waiting for them. They may be suckered once be not twice and certainly don't presume that the police are lying when they say those nice people were really crooks.

    Anyone else slightly puzzled about that Secret Service Agent giving his name? Aren't these people supposed to be secret? As in not giving their name to the press?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  159. Oh world sweet irony. by Swai · · Score: 1

    While lot of companies claim multi millionare virtual losses on kids who "hack" their systems and deploy police task forces to bring them to justice, the common schmoe gets ripped left and right with no justice at all.

    We are in a world willing to isolate and outcast countries if they don't comply with "anti terrorist" laws but if a global issue like these scams goes on the internet, they are other issue.

    Take for instance Nigeria, a country swept by corruption, 19th century laws and no utility services at all (appart aids, malaria, famine and others), is it really a priority to let them have access to the internet for the sake of world integration, browse porn or any other reason if they don't act fast on stoping the crooks cold.

    Organizations like RIPE, in charge to allocate the IP addresses for most of the countries where this scams are comming from, should have a more active role in preventing these situations than claiming they are no responsible for illegal activities carried over other ISPs. If an ISP fails 3 times in stoping scams they should get their IP spaces de-allocated.

    Ok, some people deserve what they've got from these scams just because they are greedy, but take the guy from this story (if all the facts are true), a retiree in the US has not much help from the goverment as he should, why blame him for trying to secure his financial security. Add the fact that not all people on the internet understands it and barely some of them know how to operate a computer. This is analphabetism in the 21st century.

    Regards,

    1. Re:Oh world sweet irony. by man_ls · · Score: 1

      This, actually, is one of the best ideas I've heard yet. (serious!)

      De-allocate all Nigerian's ISP netblocks if they don't start policing their netowkr for this kind of abuse.

  160. Examine the scams a little bit closer by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    You give the clue youreselve. LEGAL. Most of these scams are things that are legal! Trying to get money to save hungry childeren from your mom and keeping it myself makes me the scumbag. Your mother is truly and honestly trying to do good. She doesn't profit by it. The scam with lottery reports does work on greed but at least it doesn't act the victim to do illegal stuff.

    This guy didn't. He wanted to defraud a goverment out of money it owned legally. You can't con an honest man may not work for every scam but the nigerian scam does work with it. If you don't think it is legal to defraud and bribe then you won't fall for it. Now go ask your mom if she think it is okay to defraud the goverment out of huge fortune. With 21 billion you would be up there with the richest people of the world.

    As for what is done to prevent normal people from more normal scams? Pay enough taxes so police officers in uniform can go around and educate people about what to be aware off. It is cops that can educate and intervene and protect those that can't protect themselves.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  161. Mandatory PA link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2003-03 -28&res=l

  162. What kind of sense? by interactive_civilian · · Score: 1
    X86Daddy insightfully said:
    Trust is a good thing. Common sense is good too, but not encouraged as much. Just imagine a world where everyone had plenty of the latter.
    Heh...in a world where everyone had plenty of common sense, it might actually become...well... common .

    Cheers.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:What kind of sense? by althalus1969 · · Score: 1

      And please remember:
      "Zero Tolerance means: Zero Common Sense"

  163. Then the creators are dumb. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

    To win the Illinois lottery, for example, you would need well over $30bn. 54 numbers, 6 picks = 54!/(54!-6!) = 18,595,558,800 possible choices, times $2.

    Any lottery that allows you to do that was not created intelligently.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    1. Re:Then the creators are dumb. by Zleeper · · Score: 1

      I am a little perplexed, you state Illinois lottery to be 54 numbers but I find no such game:
      http://www.illinoislottery.com/subsections/ games.h tm
      the largest number of balls played is for the multi-sate Mega-Millions game and that is to pick 5 from the 52 numbers and then the power ball is picked from the 52 numbers again. So, 52*51*50*49*48=311,875,200 and then 52 again equals 16,217,510,400 and it plays $1 per play. SO it is only 18Bln to win it, guranteed, though probaly shared.
      The other games played 2 games for $1, so the odds are halved.

    2. Re:Then the creators are dumb. by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, but your numbers aren't quite right. The numbers that you calculated assume that the order of the five numbers (not including the mega ball) are important. The actual number of possible tickets is

      (52 C 5) * 52 = (52*51*50*49*48)/(1*2*3*4*5)*52 = 135,145,920

    3. Re:Then the creators are dumb. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I could have sworn it was out of 54. And $2 to play, but I admit I haven't played in a number of years, my numbers are probably wrong :\...

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  164. **** this is what i do **** by simonharvey · · Score: 1
    when ever anybody sends me a nigerian scam email, i scan through it and forward the email addresses to their ISPs to get there accounts terminated.

    although it dosent stop them completely, it squeeze them slightly, telling them that there are people out there that dont put up with this kind of evil.

  165. Cognitive dissonance strikes again by shanen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, none of the comments I saw made the obvious comment, which is that people tend to believe exactly what they want to believe. The fancy name is "cognitive dissonance" and reduction is the goal. In his case, he desperately wanted to believe that his financial problems were about to be solved by this manna from heaven. Actually, the article mentions his strong religious streak, which I take as symptomatic of the gullibility the 419 scammers are looking for. And now he still can't admit he was wrong.

    Actually, what it most reminds me of is many of Dubya's supporters. The bigger the shaft, the more firmly they want to support him. Just won't admit they were wrong. Sad truth is that I don't feel any particular pity for either category of sucker, but the BushCo supporters are doing more secondary harm to me and the country.

    The article also mentions the kidnappings and killings. At least some of the few we know about. That reminds me of the /. article a few weeks ago about playing games with these criminals, which prompts me to repeat my warning: These 419 scammers are nasty bastards. Just because their scams are so stupidly hilarious, doesn't mean anyone should try to play any kind of game with them. The "funny picture of 419 scammer" Web sites are doing a public disservice by portraying them as stupid clowns and harmless. They are not. If they pretend to play along with any game, they are just looking for a way to nail someone. It's just more convenient for them if they can find and victimize the stupidest people available.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  166. Twentysomethings have higher risk tolerance by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...I lived through the dot-com stock bubble.

    You don't have to be old and retired to be seduced by people promising you 500% returns on $50,000 investments. Twenty-somethings will fall for it if you use enough marketspeak.

    There were all sorts of people who lost tons of money in the dot-com bubble, old and young. But here's the thing: when you're young you can risk more in exchange for the potential of higher growth. This is very basic finanical planning: younger people have a much longer horizon and can afford a much more aggressive investing strategy. So it makes sense that twentysomethings would get excited by the possibility of a 500% return. Once you get older, however, any financial planner will advise you to limit your exposure to stocks and start shifting towards more conservative investments. When you're older, you can't be taking wild risks like when you did when you were much younger.

    Comparing this idiot with younger people who lost money in the dot-com era is just not right. In this crazy world, none of us can be all too sure of a great many things. I invested in a mix of aggressive growth internet stocks and some nice, stable, reputable mutual funds. So although I lost some money, I didn't come out all that bad. But that's just because I'm a pretty cautious guy. I have some friends my age who lost considerably more because they didn't balance risk. So they didn't come out so well but that's okay because they've got decades in which they might end up blowing me away in terms of life savings. I don't think they're stupid at all, they just have a different outlook on investing than I do. However, those people in the 50s and 60s who lost a shitload of money in the dot-com era deserve my distain as much as this scam guy. When you are getting that close to retirement you just don't take crazy chances like that! That's just being greedy.

    So please spare us this supposedly Insightful comment of yours that this scam victim is somehow just like the rest of us. He isn't. He's greedy and he's stupid. And now he's flat broke and I'm not gonna shed one single tear for him.

    GMD

  167. The Role of Religion in All This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I realize that my comment isn't a direct response to the parent but this looks like as good as a place as any to point out the religious aspect of this story. Lots of people have already pointed out that this guy is greedy and stupid. But there's something else at work here as well: he believes he is better than the rest of us because he is religious. The story specifically mentioned that as soon as the scammers started making references to God, that the Mark was hooked. This is very important. If there was any question in this doofus' mind as to whether this was legit, it was dispelled by this simple reference to God.

    Religion is a divisive force in our society. While I do not doubt that some people have obtained some benefitted from religion, it largely serves to label people and compartmentalize our supposed "melting pot". People are identified by their religious faith in the same manner as race and sex are used. But religion is unique in that people choose their religion. This makes them feel like they really belong and that others do not. In the mind of the devoutly religious, people are divided into the "have faith/found God" camp which is considered Good and "the other godless wretches" which are considered Bad. Religion serves a "secret society" kind of role in which members, consciously or not, consider other members to be "better" than non-members.

    So what does this anti-religious tirade have to do with an internet scam? Mr. Religious Scam Victim sees an opportunity to profit handsomely from a deal that he knows very little about. Why was he chosen? Why would these people trust him? Because he's religious, of course. He's a member of The Club (also known as God's Favorite Children). He has been given this opportunity because either (a) good things happen to members of The Club because they're the Good guys in the world or (b) God has selected him for this mission. The money is about to be stolen away by some evil, nonreligous foreign government and it's up to him and the Chosen Ones to make sure it stays in the hands of the faithful. Why does he deserve this money? Because he's religous, and therefore, better than most people. In his mind, it's as simple as this.

    Some people have expressed anger at this guy for being stupid. Some have expressed sympathy for him. Some have laughed at his greed while others feel pity. But there's one characteristic of his psyche that has not been called out yet. He believes that he is a better human being than people without religion. If you don't want to hate him for being stupid or greedy, then I implore you to hate him for having the arrogance to believe that he is a better person that those who do not subscribe to any religion.

    1. Re:The Role of Religion in All This by computerjunkie123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He believes that he is a better human being than people without religion. If you don't want to hate him for being stupid or greedy, then I implore you to hate him for having the arrogance to believe that he is a better person that those who do not subscribe to any religion." And this is why religious people are *sometimes * better people. *Most* religions teach love as the ultimate quality to strive for. You, on the other hand believe it is good to hate someone simply based on what they choose to believe. In fact, this sentiment of yours makes you no better than the radical Islamacists who want to kill everybody who is not one of them. How "religious" of you!

    2. Re:The Role of Religion in All This by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, religious people are more gullible--especially when the scammer is a master manipulator of religion. One needs to look no further than the Ku Klux Klan. Yes, they are a religious organization. Just go and read the KKK Charter and you'll find that they justify everything from the Bible. Anyway, so many people actually BELIEVE what the grand dragons of the KKK say about religion. They are just too gullible.

      Or one just needs to look at certain countries where religious "leaders" have the following of mass number of people even though the so-called leaders are discredited.

      I also think conservatives are more likely to fall for these scams. Conservatives have a habit of living in caves and are more likely to be manipulated. I have no proof of this but I would love to hear of anyone that has done any study tying econopolitical stance with scams.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    3. Re:The Role of Religion in All This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      is your friend.
    4. Re:The Role of Religion in All This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to agree with your view for the most part. I was raised in a southern baptist household (my dad was a preacher) and I know first hand how vile these people can be while they smile in your face a pretend to offer you a helping hand but, the minute you don't swallow their dogma, they'll be first in line with their torches ready to burn you at the stake. Take Rev. Phelps for instance, he sponsors over 40 protests a week proclaiming everything from "NYC fire department is a faggoty institution" to "Mr. Rogers is burning in Hell" under the guise of "a servant of GOD" and that "he's doing it because he loves the people" at whom he's spewing his hate.

      People in this subset of humanity tend to be the mentally weaker, more gullible ones who'll believe whatever they're told as long as you tack on a "GOD told me it was true" at the end because they seem to think they're smarter than everyone else or more "righteous" and that they'll get some huge reward either now or when they die.

      It so reminds me of Mars Attacks when the Martians were running around with the recording blasting "we come in peace" blowing everything up. I mean come on, Joseph Smith and those golden plates and the whole face in the hat thing. I mean come on! How gullible can people be? Ok, the seventy virgin thing is pretty good because it combines sex AND GOD, the most basic human urge backed up with "because GOD told me it was true".

      This is social Darwinism at one of it's better moments. I tend to remember the saying "If it seems to good to be true, it usually is" and live by it. Knowing that the Universe gives you back what you put out helps too. Everything balances in one way or another. The problem with this poor gullible sap getting taken for everything he had and more is that I believe he knew this was too good to be true and then ignored his best judgement and let his greed get the best of him.

      There is a lesson in everything. Unfortunately, his was a little expensive. The good thing is that maybe someone as gullible as he is will read his account and not be taken next time. If not, I agree, they get what they deserve. Unfortunately, society tends to take up the slack for the stupid ones. We can't make a law to protect everyone from everything. At some point, people have to take responsibility for their own actions.

      The problem with religion though is that it tells these people that it's not their fault. They try to teach people that nothing is EVER their fault. Someone else is always to blame. If something good happens, it's because you're in "GOD's" favor and if something bad happens it's the "Devil" or that GOD is pissed off at you.

      We're given free-will for a reason. I don't believe GOD, The Universe, The Creator or whatever is sitting somewhere waiting to help us win the lottery when we're good or stub our toe when we're bad. That's just not the way the Universe works. Everything balances one way or another. We get repaid for whatever we put out and will ALWAYS have what we need. This guy just tried to pull a fast one on someone else and got taken for a ride. He just has to suck it up and bend over and take it. Apparently he had a very big lesson to learn. I hope he got it this time.

  168. I don't think it works quite the same way. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    At least in Canada, if I go right to work after high school I can expect to earn about 12,000$ a year. If I go to university, jobs start at about 30,000$ and go to about 70,000$ or more.

    The average student loan debt after 4 years of university is about $25,000 (again, these are Canadian values -- those studying in the US should look into studying in Canada). With things like interest factored in, you're looking at about $35,610.75 on a $25,000 loan with interest over a 10 year payoff (~$297 a month).

    So you pay 35 grand so that you can earn about 20 to 50 thousand dollars a year more than you would've otherwise, over the entire span of your work career. The $35,000 investment thus gives you a net of about $1,565,000 .. yea, that extra 1.5 million dollars sure makes you a wage slave :p

    The best part is that you can stick all that extra money away (or even just a percent) in RRSPs and let it grow interest free until you retire, allowing you to live on the interest and give something to your children.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:I don't think it works quite the same way. by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

      Tax free. Not interest free.

  169. Here's what to do by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    I think this shows exactly how we should all deal with these scammers. The Tale of the Holy Cow is particularly funny.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  170. And another thing... by ads.osdn.com.blocked · · Score: 1

    DOH!

    --

    public final transient String president = DUBYA;
  171. Real estate 101 by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1

    All true. The one thing to keep in mind is that real estate does occasionally go down. Money's latest issue has a column that's really kind of scary. It says someone predicts that as historically low interest rates rise, the actual sales prices of homes may fall significantly.

    --
    Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
  172. Had a friend fall for this scam by sumbry · · Score: 1

    And the point that you all are completely missing is that this scam is designed by people alot more smarter than you are who have been doing this for much longer than you could possibly imagine.

    The scam is designed to target people. In the same way that a magician is able to use sleight of hand to make everyone think a tiger on stage has dissapeared, these guys have had decades to perfect this scam. If given the chance, they could probably fool anyone (think about it: if you got an email/phone call saying that some distant relative had left no will but cash and some lawyer had been searching years for you and finally found you and wanted to turn the money over to you, you wouldn't be as quick to dismiss it, in the end the story and players can always be changed to the point that you wouldn't recognize it as a 419 scam anymore).

    In my friends instance, he was a sysadmin who had been contacted by another friend (his friend was the one who had originally been taken). Because he believed his buddy (someone he had known since childhood) he went to Nigeria to check things out. The people he met, everyone he dealt with, he compared it to doing business w/a bank. There were bankers, lawyers, so much money was being thrown around by everyone that he just fell into it. Expensive lunches (they paid for some), cabs and hotel rooms, it never ended.

    I told him one thing, if you do believe this and give them money and they come up with an excuse and ask for more, run like hell. They did and he did, but not before being taken for a few grand.

    They knew he was a computer person, probably figured he was a very logical person, and used that to formulate their plan of attack. The scam is about fooling people, and if you're given enough time and practice, you can fool anyone.

    Just look at the guys from Tyco, Enron, etc. They gobbled billions from people all over the world and squandered it away. And they fooled people much smarter than the majority of Slashdot readers.

    Don't be so quick to dismiss someone as being stupid for falling for a scam. Anyone can be fooled and most of us have been at some point or another (by scams legal and illegal) and never even realized it.

  173. Made in China. by khasim · · Score: 1

    No, the bad government makes us stamp "Made in China" on the bottom of all our authentic, hand carved statues. That way they can jack up the price by claiming they're "imports". Your carved wooden elephant and antelope are authentic African design and carving.

  174. psycology to blame ? by felix9x · · Score: 1

    I think just greed is a bad way to describe what causes people to fall such crap. I am sure someone has fallen for some type of scam or been duped by a conman at some point in our lives even if the results were not severe.

    The conman plays their role well they can disable persons natural skepticism. After being duped by someone we think "oh shit all the signs were there if only i was thinking". It could be adrenaline rush, could be stress, could be current conditiones , could be many things that disable persons ability too think criticaly.

    What is surprising about this case if that after dashing over cash the guy still didnt figure out he was duped after having time to think about it for days. Like the article states most people only lose about $3800 which suggests they only pay out once and getting it. The scammers did a superb job in this case of helping this guy sustain his illutions.

  175. Re:Why was it marked flamebait? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    No wonder you never made it to the NHL ;)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  176. YOUR HELP IS NEEDED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am Mr. Darl McBride, the CEO of SCO corporation.

    I am in charge of this firm which is fast sinking due to the fact no one will pay my Linux toll. The litigation sector has a peculiar nature in my country as it concerns financial transactions; anything is possible for you to stay afloat with the enormous compensation therein to the right scummy lawyers.

    Unfortunatly, my own lawyers have failed me and so I need to get what little money the company has left out of the corporate accounts before the company tanks and the shareholders try to take what is left. I have $37 million I was recently given by Microsoft who is trying to prop up my attempt to destroy linux. I fear they will want it back if things fail and I feel it is time to get out before the end.

    Taking into cognizance the foregoing, I am in a position to make all necessary arrangement to portray you as my "lawyer" so that I can pretend to have payed all the money to a real lawyer should Microsoft or the sharewolders come looking for it. I only ask that you help me set up an account to funnel the money into. I will let you keep half of this $37 million for yourself. That will leave us both with more than enough money to flee to Brazil and live it up for the rest of our lives should the true nature of this scheme come to light.

    Call me so that we can discuss further at 1-800-726-8649.

    Thank you!

    Darl McBride

  177. Re: Why lottery is different. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    The problem is when people get addicted to it. Spending a few dollars, or even a few hundread in an year, is not bad. But spending thousands can destroy people's lives.

    If playing the lottery is ok, is the casino ok too? In both cases, it is ADDICTION that is the problem...

    In any case, the view that it is a "tax" on the poor is correct. The people who play lotteries are the poor and only a FEW win. The loterry companies extract more from the lower classes than they give back (that's why they are in business and make billions).

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  178. The US government should reimburse this asshat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's my opinion. Either that or he needs to sue his ISP out of existence.

  179. Anyone can be fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I got conned out of a few hundred dollars around 2 years ago. It was so good that I didnt even really believe it was a con till now. Anyone remember cyberrebates.com? They had all sorts of stuff that was free or almost free after a rebate that they sent you in a few months. The catch was the stuff was ridiculously marked up in the first place (eg $100 for a flashlight).

    The site meticulously documented the many thousands of people who already received their rebates and the millions in merchandise already sold.

    But my rebate check never came. They suddenly went bankrupt and disappeared into the night. At the time I thought it was just another dot bomb. But now I see it has the earmarks of a huge con that must have made the principals insanely rich.

    As with the original story I guess the sweetest con is the one where the mark never even realizes he was was hit. Looking back at the cyberrebates story, at the time it was widely considered legit. I'm still not sure!

  180. Give the guy a break by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

    OK, OK, yeah - he was dumb to be so trusting. But, GEEZ, people - this is clearly an old retired guy. His main problem was that he was too trusting and naive, that he had too much faith in the goodness of people. Now, to me and the rest of us jaded cynics on elbows, distrust is second nature. But not everyone is so cynical.

    Could you give the poor old guy just a *little* sympathy? How many of you know a nice old lady or retired guy who's just as sweet and trusting as can be? If this happened to *them*, would you spew venom and say "Hah! They deserved it!" If you dear old grandma did this would you say "Well, granny, tough shit - guess you shouldn't have been so trusting!" And there doesn't seem to be any real greed in this story. He was just trying what he thought was a legal, ethical way to improve his retirement nest egg - and $300,000 ain't a hell of a lot to retire on! He even said he hoped to use the money for "good works".

    There's a very good reason that the elderly are *THE* primary targets of scam artists: not just because they tend to have money, but because they grew up in a time that was more trusting. They have a harder time saying "no" when someone pushes them because they don't want to be rude. And they have a harder time seeing the evil intent. Con artists don't exactly appear with a pitchfork and horns - they're *very* slick and know exactly how to deal with old people to gain their trust.

    Let's face it, many senior citizens are so ignored by society and their familys that they're *happy* just to have someone - anyone - to talk to, especially a nice young man who treats them well, listens respectfully, and pays a lot of attention to them. Maybe if families took a more active role in the lives of their parents and grandparents instead of just shoving them off into nursing homes, they wouldn't be so desperate for attention.

    So, all you cruel Slashdot grinches, yes - he acted stupidly. But don't you think you could spare just a little sympathy for someone whose only real crime was that his trust in human nature blinded him?

  181. One can certainly go to school cheaply in the US. by cduffy · · Score: 1

    I left CSU, Chico after four years with a surplus in the bank. Tuition was only a bit over $2000 per year, books and such about $800 -- I paid as I went, and never needed a single loan.

    That said, in several industries, the whole matter of having a degree at all is really quite optional. Several of the best engineers I know don't, and their careers are getting along just fine. Further, in the job I have now, I was selected from a pool of candidates which included multiple PHDs.

    Further, living in Texas (as I do now), the taxes I pay are minimal (there are no state income taxes here), so I'm able to live far more comfortably than I could in Canada. (That said, I certainly don't have the same kind of safety nets available in the event of some severe hardship).

    Folks like the grandparent poster who claim that a tremendously expensive education is mandatory in the US (except in some specialized fields such as medicine) are simply full of it.

  182. An age old saying... by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

    "A Fool and his money are soon parted". What I want to know, is how does someone stupid enough to fall for such an obvious scam manage to make so much money in the first place?

  183. Merry Christmas by dcollins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm astonished that so many posts here think this story is funny, or that this guy (and wife) got what he deserved. This is the saddest story I've read in a while. Of all the lassaiz-faire, libertarian-style thought that flows around on Slashdot, this "stupid people deserve to lose all their money" attitude is the most chilling. I mean, come on, that's the exact same justification made by con men and scammers themselves.

    There are people in the world that cannot take care of themselves. Some are retarded or suffer from psychosis or other mental problems. Some suffer from incurable illnesses. Some are too young or too old. Some are disabled and unable to work. And some are just not smart, that is, stupid.

    Which of these categories deserve to be broke and homeless? Which of these should we kick to the curb without any assistance or fallback support? Which of these can we laugh at because they're scared about where they're going to be able to sleep or feed their freaking dog?

    Tough for me to say that about any of them.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  184. Education by XNormal · · Score: 1

    There really needs to be stronger international enforcement on these scams.

    Education wil be much more effective than enforcement. Get the Hallmark Channel to produce a drama about a 419 victim.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  185. I can't but shake my head by haraldm · · Score: 1
    How daft can a single person be? Is there an upper limit to stupidity, scientifically speaking? Are there negative I.Q. values? Has that ever been researched? What is stronger - stupidity or greed? Ohmygod.

    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    -- Albert Einstein

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  186. It's sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how people like this can be taken for everything. Before condemning them, we must consider that some elderly people aren't mentally capable of discerning a fraud, even when forewarned. Elderly people are often set in their ways, and in such cases it is difficult to get them to change their minds, for any reason. Some people have too much faith in mankind, and blame societies ills on society itself, and not on the failures of men.

    Anyway you look at it, whether his punishment was deserved or not, there should be a legal solution. Close relations of these scam victims should declare them unfit to manage their personal finances before major damage is done. Power of attorney should be granted whenever a case like this presents itself. If there are no surviving relatives, then the management of the estate should be given to the state. This may sound harsh, but the alternative is far beyond worse.

    This should be the case for those who are not elderly as well. Anyone who falls for a scam after being warned by the authorities should meet the criteria of being unfit to manage their finances.

    If there is no legal precedent for this solution then there should be. As for this specific case, I pity him and especially his wife. They will have to suffer on account of his failings and the deceipt of the worst of criminals, those who prey upon hope.

  187. Re:Feel sorry for him? by evilviper · · Score: 1
    If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

    I hate this stupid old argument...

    Nothing "sounds too good to be true" unless you already know that it is a scam. For instance, a completely free PC would sound too good to be true, but sure enough, they were giving them away, just a few years ago.

    Nothing sounds too good to be true, because crazier things have happened... People have won the lottery, people have inherited millions of dollars, etc. Yet people continue to say "if it sounds too good..." as if it's an all-purpose, magical divining-rod that, when you ask yourself, will instantly reveal any scam, no matter who you are, no matter how much you know, etc.

    you'll never fall for one of these scams. To do so you need to be either crooked or stupid or both.

    You need to tell that to everyone who invested in WorldCom and Enron.

    You are pretending that no rational person can be scammed, because it gives you piece of mind. People used to do the same things in the distant past... People once thought it you were a good Christian person, bad things wouldn't happen to you. If anything bad happened to a good person, they much have been evil deep-down, and nobody knew it.

    "It's too good to be true..." is just another way that people think they can control things that aren't under their control. It's a new-aged rabbit's foot, and horseshoe, rolled into one.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  188. winning the lottery without sharing by David+Jao · · Score: 1
    I tend to play when the jackpot is 3N where the chance of winning is 1/N, since I like poker and this situation only comes up every few years, but to take everything into account, you should wait until the jackpot is about 6N

    Some states let you pick your own numbers on your lottery tickets. You can substantially increase your chances of not sharing the prize by picking relatively high numbers, which are less likely to be picked by others since most other people's "lucky" numbers tend to be low numbers.

    Picking the high numbers doesn't affect your own chance of winning, but it has a very definite effect on your chance of having to share the prize if you win. Unfortunately I don't have specific figures to quantify the size of this effect.

    1. Re:winning the lottery without sharing by Lonath · · Score: 1

      Some states let you pick your own numbers on your lottery tickets. You can substantially increase your chances of not sharing the prize by picking relatively high numbers, which are less likely to be picked by others since most other people's "lucky" numbers tend to be low numbers.

      Interesting. I will have to remember that if the lottery ever gets that high again. Thanks.

  189. My story by danila · · Score: 1

    Some peopel are immune to 419 scams. When I was young, I got my first Nigerian scam letter, telling a sad story about some family of the President, who was overthrown. I was asked to help transfer the funds and get a cut. What do you think I said in response?..

    Being the kind, honest and altruistic young man I was, I wrote them that I would be more than happy to help and, even more, I would do it for free, just out of pity to their bad situation. Now please think, how much I would be motivated to send them any cash or to go to Nigeria with any money? Not in the very least, since I am already doing them a favour. :) How motivated were the Nigerians? Apparently, not much, since our e-mail exchange soon subdued.

    Thus the moral of the story - lack of greed makes you immune to 419 and many other scams. :)

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    1. Re:My story by Ogman · · Score: 1

      Well stated and very true.

      --
      But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
  190. 419 Scams = Terrorism by thelizman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm going to connect a few dots here. Persian Gulf. Bought laptops, cellphones for scammers. $320,000 (buys a lot of kalishnakov rifles). Has anyone yet considered that the 419 Scams have evolved from a simple scam, to an urban legend, to a joke, to a sad commentary on the gullability of westerners, and finally, to a viable revenue stream for terrorist organizations?

  191. Face of Stupidity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    This, Ladies and Gentlemen, is the Face of Stupidity!

    "I consider them my friends," he says. "They're not criminals."

  192. Feel Sorry for this guy but by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    Dont forget that he fell for something that did hint at money earned via illegal and corrupt means.Meaning he paid for his greed.Maybe the sayings of the old are true sometimes.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  193. To translate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I never went to college, so now I hate and disparage all those who do. And I have a $20,000-$30,000 per year job."

  194. Using viruses against 419 scammers? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    Has anyone had a look at what kind of e-mail software these scammers use? If you get a reply and check the headers, perhaps you would find that they use an old version of Outlook Express or similar?

    Now, it might be illegal, but it might also be interesting to exploit security holes in OE to gain access to their computer!

    Actually, you might not even need to exploit holes - if you are able to make them run an executable attachment with some kind of backdoor program you could use.

    Wouldn't it be rather nice to get full access to their PC, or maybe even their entire network! Imagine the evidence you could gather. I'm sure it could be of use to someone :)

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  195. Hipocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know which disgusts me more, the scammers or some of the replies here. I bet you're all WAY too smart to fall for a pretty woman asking you to buy her a drink, right? That just happens to fools and stupid people, who deserve to lose their money, right?

    BULLSHIT.

    Most of you arrogant, ignorant morons are EXACTLY the type who, at some point, get taken in by a scam. But just like this poor man, you think you're too smart to be taken, so you live in denial. Yet, you talk about the poor guy like he deserved it? Well, when your time comes, you actually WILL deserve it.

  196. Mod parent down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no empathy for moderation beggers :)

    But seriously, I both agree this man was greedy, stupid, and that it's beyond belief that he still trusts the spammers. However I do feel sorry for him. I'm wondering if Slashdot is a bunch of sociopaths without the ability or desire to feel what others are feeling.

    So yes, I think even this man deserves sympathy. I'm not saying we should pool our money and give it to him, or that he shouldn't learn from his mistakes. But I'm sure we've all made bad decisions which we still live while telling ourselves they are someone else's fault.

    He would rather blame the foreign governments than himself. Blaming is another human trait which we all share. In fact, I see a lot of blaming here on Slashdot. We aren't all super-perfect humans because we like technology.

  197. Darwinism is not what you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually your example of someone tripping into a fire is more akin to Darwinism that someone losing a bunch of money. Darwin's theory is "survival of the fit" -- meaning those who survive will be able to reproduce and generate offspring thereby automatically selecting individuals fit for their environment.

    Darwin despised the idea that rich people grabbed onto his theory to explain that they were somehow better than everyone else because the money they had "proved" it. Social Darwinism is a failed theory, and was never expoused by Darwin himself. The fitness for the environment could select for many types of individuals. It is certainly possible that stupidity is specifically selected for in certain environments. In the case of people in modern societies that is pretty much established: uneducated people have more children.

    In summary, if you want to judge people for being stupid please check your facts first.

  198. How... American of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed the tendency to blame the victim in the US more than other places. Why? Ok, in this instance you can reasonably argue the victim had a large role in his misfortunes. But he was still taken advantage of and his retirement is probably ruined. I feel sorry for him. I don't think "he deserved it".

    This was certainly a greedy and foolish man. And he is obviously in denial about what he has done. I agree that he should have known better, and that people did everything they could be expected to do to help him. I'm not saying anybody should have done anything differently (except for him). I'm not saying that someone needs to find a way to fix it for him.

    What I am saying is: do you really have no sympathy for him at all? If so, that is sad and scary, and I guess it says a lot about the current state of society.

  199. Preparing victims expectations by Myrthe · · Score: 1
    So you're, what, suggesting that he believed that the police were actually smurfs from under clover hill, trying to dupe him out of his duty to collect money from individuals in another country?

    The article doesn't say, but I wonder how he was prepped for intervention by the authorities. Controlling expectations is a very important part of any long-term con*: "When people find out, they won't like this. They'll say I'm trying to get you to do something illegal or wrong. But you have a lawyer, you've seen the documents..." etc. Then when the police show up, they just play into the role. "yep, my nigerian friend said you'd say that".

    I think the FBI could/should use a previous victim to give testimonial. "Hi Rupert, I'm Shane. I was taken in by these same people 6 years ago..." This also makes it less embarassing to admit the truth.

    * Also vital in giving tech support.

    1. Re:Preparing victims expectations by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't say, but I wonder how he was prepped for intervention by the authorities.

      Y'know, this is certainly an issue. That said, if the FBI comes to you with hard evidence of a hundred different similar scams and data on this one, it's just time to fucking listen. :D

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  200. Thank you by Featureless · · Score: 1

    I couldn't have said it better myself.

    "Oh yes, this will pay off big, after you're dead."

  201. Who's got this guy's address... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to buy his house... I'm sure I can get a good deal on it... no really. I'm serious.

    It sounds shitty, but he needs $$$ and I want his property.

  202. Re:Feel sorry for him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's bizarre to see someone post a dozen links to his post everywhere the phrase "too good to be true" appears. Not technically rude, but creepy.

    Nothing "sounds too good to be true" unless you already know that it is a scam

    No, you're estimating risk, reward and costs.

    If anything bad happened to a good person, they much have been evil deep-down, and nobody knew it

    That is discussed and refuted in Ecclesiastes and Job.

    just another way that people think they can control things that aren't under their control

    Yes, exactly. Why I could die on the toilet just like Elvis did! But that sounds too bad to be true, so I'll take the risk.

  203. A 419 in the wild! by Mir322 · · Score: 1

    This is what a 419 looks like, isn't it? ! heh. i just got it in the mail today. I'm amused. 'thought i'd share

    From: "Mariam Hisman"
    FROM MISS MARIAM HISMAN
    COTE D'IVOIRE ABIDJAN
    WEST AFRICA.
    TELE/+22507705977.

    DEAR ,

    PERMIT ME TO INFORM YOU OF MY DESIRE OF GOING INTO
    BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU. I GOT YOUR NAME AND
    CONTACT FROM IVOIREAN FOREIGN PARTNERS SEARCH ENGINE.

    I PRAYED OVER IT AND SELECTED YOUR NAME AMONG OTHER NAMES DUE TO IT'S ESTEEMING NATURE AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN TO ME AS A REPUTABLE AND TRUSWORTHY PERSON I CAN DO BUSINESS WITH AND BY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS I MUST NOT HESISTATE TO CONFIDE IN YOU
    FOR THIS SIMPLE AND SINCERE BUSINESS.

    I AM MISS MARIAM HISMAN, THE ONLY DOUGHTER OF LATE ALAHAJI WAZIRI HISMAN. MY FATHER WAS A VERY WEALTHY COCOA MERCHANT BASED IN ABIDJAN, THE ECONOMIC CAPITAL OF IVORY COAST BEFORE HE WAS POISONED TO DEATH BY HIS BUSINESS ASSOCIATES ON ONE OF THEIR OUTING TO DISCUSS ON A BUSINESS.

    WHEN MY MOTHER DIED ON THE 21ST OCTOBER 1978, MY FATHER TOOK ME SO SPECIAL BECAUSE OF THE DEATH OF MATHER AND ALSO AS THE ONLY CHILD OF ALAHAJI HISMAN.

    BEFORE THE DEATH OF MY FATHER ON 29TH JUNE 2002 IN A PRIVATE HOSPITAL HERE IN ABIDJAN. HE SECRETLY CALLED ME ON HIS BEDSIDE AND TOLD ME THAT HE HAS A SUM OF 26,300,000 ( TWENTY SIX MILLION THREE HUNDRED THOUSANDS DOLLARS,)DEPOSITED IN A SECURITY COMPANY HERE IN ABIDJAN.HE USED MY NAME AS DEPOSITOR AND NOT THE BENEFICIARY DUE TO OUR POLITICAL STATUS AND THE NATURE OF DEPOSIT I CAN NOT SERVE AS THE BENEFICIARY.

    HE ALSO EXPLAINED TO ME THAT IT WAS BECAUSE OF THIS WEALTH THAT HE WAS POISONED BY HIS BUSINESS ASSOCIATES. THAT I SHOULD SEEK FOR A FOREIGN PARTNER IN A COUNTRY OF MY CHOICE WHERE I WILL TRANSFER THIS MONEY AND USE IT FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSE, (SUCH AS REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT).

    I AM HONOURABLY SEEKING FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS.
    2)TO SERVE AS THE GUARDIAN OF THIS FUND SINCE I AM IS STILL YOUNG GIRL OF 26YEARS.
    3). You honestly take me as your family?
    4). Can I completely trust you?
    5). What percentage of the total amount in question will
    be good for you after the money is in your country
    6).TO MAKE ARRANGEMENT FOR ME TO COME OVER TO YOUR
    COUNTRY AFTER THE MONEY HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED.
    MOREOVER, I AM WILLING TO OFFER YOU 25% OF THE TOTAL SUM AS COMPENSATION FOR YOUR EFFORT/INPUT AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL TRANSFER OF THIS FUND TO YOUR COUNTRY OVERSEAS.FURTHERMORE, YOU CAN INDICATE YOUR OPTION TOWARDS ASSISTING ME AS I BELIEVE THAT THIS TRANSACTION WOULD BE CONCLUDED WITHOUT PROBLEMS.INTEREST TO ASSIST ME.

    ANTICAIPTING TO HEAR FROM YOU SOON.

    THANKS AND BEST REGRADS.

    MISS MARIAM HISMAN.

    -------

    --
    "There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness."- Friedrich Nietzsche
  204. Factor in an equation by phorm · · Score: 1

    Something looking "too good to be true" doesn't mean you should automatically dismiss the idea. If it looks too good to be true, then further investigation is warranted before proceeding. If it then starts to smell fishy, be careful before investing in such an endeavour.

  205. Third worlders by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I was just quoting the parent message. I agree the term is somewhat derogatory and I don't like using it but it is generally used to classify nations economically.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning