Slashdot Mirror


FBI Conducts Raids Over Half-Life 2 Source Theft

TheXerox writes "According to a recent weblog post, a San Francisco native had his house raided by the FBI last week, and 'lost upwards of 9 machines, and lots of misc equipment besides' in a seizure related to the theft of the Half-Life 2 source code from Valve Software." The scanned-in search warrant posted on the site indicates the FBI were looking for "...any IP addresses related to any of the Valve internal or external networks... Valve passwords and/or usernames... any and all items... related to Valve Software, Half-Life, Half-Life 2", and the Hungry Programmers page mentions that "...several Hungries were raided on January 14th by the FBI and Secret Service, and their computers seized."

175 of 957 comments (clear)

  1. slow already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    full mirror inc. warrent here

  2. Secret Service by pvt_medic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is the secret service involved? Arent they only concerned with protecvting the president and fake currency?

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
    1. Re:Secret Service by proj_2501 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I forget exactly why it's technically under their jurisdiction, but 2600 has (had?) a large section on their website detailing the Secret Service's activities against suspected hackers, crackers, etc. such as busting up 2600 meetings and seizing any computer bits anybody had on them at the time.

    2. Re:Secret Service by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Secret Service charter gives them jurisdiction in many computer crime cases. They tend to work with the FBI, but not always.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Secret Service by LocoSpitz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Since 1984, our investigative responsibilities have expanded to include crimes that involve financial institution fraud, computer and telecommunications fraud, false identification documents, access device fraud, advance fee fraud, electronic funds transfers, and money laundering as it relates to our core violations.
      Secret Service Website

    4. Re:Secret Service by Scyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe the Secret Service provides Technical Forensic services for other agencies.

    5. Re:Secret Service by menn0nite · · Score: 5, Informative

      No,
      the secret service has never been all about protecting the president. They started out primerily as treasury cops, however if I remember correctly, all cases of computer related fraud where damages pass the $10,000 mark and cross state lines fall into their jurisdiciton. That why they're always involved with all the big time hacker cases.

      for more info, check out United States Code (USC) 1030

    6. Re:Secret Service by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Funny
      Since 1984...

      Oh, the irony...

    7. Re:Secret Service by jimi1283 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haven't you seen Hackers? The Secret Service does everything!

    8. Re:Secret Service by allism · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's the RIAA's job to hijack property from street vendors.

    9. Re:Secret Service by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was protecting the fake president and currency, myself...

    10. Re:Secret Service by LnxAddct · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know a Secret Service Agent (family member) and I know an FBI agent through a computer related crime that happened at my firm. What you said is much more true then you probably realize. The Secret Service really is involved with everything, and I mean everything. Protecting the President is a very small portion of what they do. The FBI is pretty involved with alot of things, but the SS is crazy.
      Regards,
      Steve

    11. Re:Secret Service by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haven't you seen Hackers?

      Ah yes, the best nerd-are-cool fantasy ever.


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    12. Re:Secret Service by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why is the secret service involved?"

      And why didn't they raid the set-top box companies thought to have used GPL code without a license?

    13. Re:Secret Service by probbka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doubleplusironic...

      --
      Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
    14. Re:Secret Service by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have any evidence to prove it? You're the one making claims. It falls upon you to prove it.

      If I claim there was electricity in Elizabethean England, it's my responsibility to prove it, not yours to disprove it.

    15. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The main problem with right wing parties, which you touched on, is that they do tend to be more against the minorities for various reasons (e.g. homosexuals), this is an aspect I find very distasteful in itself. However if you drop the bigotry then that might actually be a side I could claim to lean to.

      I don't think you can just ignore that "bigotry". That is one the reasons conservatism rarely supports liberties. I'm not saying YOU are a bigot or that all conservatives are. However the ideology lends itself to it.

      It's not as if conservatives are evil, or bad, or whatever. It's just that their beliefs lead to undesired (from a liberal point of view) effects. For example, the reason conservatives are against homosexuals is because of religion. If you are religious, you are on the right. And if you are on the right, you likely won't support equality for homosexuals since religious texts claims that homosexuals are inferior (or some such thing).

      In any case, the enemy of freedom is totalitarianism. Both conservatives and liberals will oppose that to the death...

      I think you are a conservative or a centrist/moderate (eg. center-right). Just for reference, I'm on the far-left. We will likely disagree on 90% of the issues but we are getting along well here :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    16. Re:Secret Service by Babbster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Eliot Ness wasn't an agent of the FBI. He was an agent of the US Treasury Department Prohibition Bureau, performing duties that would later be taken over by the Bureau of ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms).

  3. it would ... by jkcity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would really piss me off to lose my machines if I never did anything, I wonder how long it would be before you got them back and what kind of condition they would be in.

    1. Re:it would ... by nat5an · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People always seem to think that if the feds take your computers they'll trash them and wipe them and then give them back to you. Though I don't have any personal experience, if you think about forensic techniques and chain-of-evidence type stuff, most likely they'll copy your drives and not even touch your original equipment (this is the standard technique anyways). Really the question is if you ever get your machines back. They might wipe them out, but that would probably seriously screw up their case if there was any evidence on them.

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
    2. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      never if they found any illegal items such as warez, drug referances, or suspected underage porn. anything remotely considered 'suspect' would allow them to keep the equipment.

      I think it's wronge they took his xbox or anything else that could be used to store data.

      I mean why take the entire machine? they can just pop the hdd and run off with it.. sounds like this is how they get 'free' upgrades for the field offices.

    3. Re:it would ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative

      Steve Jackson Games had this happen back in the 80s...you know, before the invention of Half-Life and Everquest, and hence before computers were interesting. They were raided by the SS (for a totally bogus reason) and had their computers siezed. Came really, really close to shutting down the company for good because of this. Years later, when the computers were obsolete, and after the SS had been criticized by a federal judge for being abusive, SJG got its 286 computers returned. Hooray for justice!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:it would ... by sch1sm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Took me 18 months, and I was innocent. Got my equipment back and it was covered in grime and obviously had not been taken care of, had masking tape and residue all over it.

    5. Re:it would ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, forgot to add, SJG got $250,000 in damages from the government for its ill-treatment. $50,000 compensation (subject to taxation as income) and $200,000 for the lawyers. Who really won in this case?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:it would ... by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Then if you're found to be innocent, I don't think they have any responsibility to clean up their mess or repair your property.

      True, but not entirely the whole story. The basic rule is that they have no responsibility to fix anything, but you have the right to file a (fully itemized) claim of exactly what was damaged, how much it's worth, etc, etc. And you'll generally get it, too... if you don't mind filling out some paperwork; talking to some local, state, DOJ, or military lawyers; and then waiting awhile (18 - 24 months isn't uncommon). Remember...

      No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

      But that doesn't mean they have to make it easy for you. ;)

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    7. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      True story, I swear it...

      In 1997 I cracked a machine in a nearby school district. Not for any particular purpose, but because it was running SunOS. Of course, being lazy and actually somewhat bad at covering my tracks, I got caught about a month later. I just wasn't cut out to be a badass hacker, I guess.

      Anyway, the police came to my school and "arrested" me (although I think it was all a setup, because I was never read my rights, and I was never handcuffs -- I think it was a scare tactic, and I was never officially "arrested"). They allowed me to drive my own car back to my house, so they could collect evidence.

      They played "good cop, bad cop" with me. But the good cop really was good. He seemed impressed with my skill level, and he actually smiled and talked with me in a conversational tone, like he was interested in how I'd pulled it off. He promised to try and convince his boss to let me off easy. They took my machine into evidence, and I didn't see it for 7 months.

      Later that year, after serving my community service, I got a call from the evidence room saying my computer was ready to be picked up. I drove over as fast as possible, fearing the drive had been wiped and all my source code lost. Imagine my surprise when I picked up the machine and it had a Post-It note on it saying "I took the liberty to upgrade your computer. A real hacker needs a 33-MHz, not a 20."

      I raced home and popped the case. Sure enough, the detective had installed a 33 MHz 486, and also an additional 4 meg of RAM. I was blown away.

      To this day, I am thankful for the detective making the effort to prevent me from going to jail for what I did. I learned my "lesson" the moment the reality dawned on me that I had police officers searching my mother's house. I haven't hacked since, and I hold that detective in the highest regard for seeing that I was just a stupid kid who didn't mean any harm.

      I count myself truly lucky to have been arrested by such a man :-)

    8. Re:it would ... by Casualposter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A friend of mine caught a person stealling his VCR out of a college dorm. The VCR was taken and held for evidence for nearly two years. It was totally trashed when he got it back. This was in the early days of the VCR when a good machine when for many hundreds of dollars.

      It's not just if you get your machine back; it also could be broken beyond all recovery. Oh yeah, the cops claimed that the damage all occurred during the crime, even though we are pretty sure that was not the case.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    9. Re:it would ... by Qrlx · · Score: 4, Informative

      The important lesson here is that you can be deprived of all that stuff, so long as there is due process. In other words, once the cops seize your stuff, they don't have to give it back, so long as the initial seizure was legal.

      It's really bad in civil cases. They can take your stuff (house, car, boat, whatever), never charge you with anything, and you'll never see it again. Seizing assets in a civil action this way is a big part of the War on Drugs. All the cops have to do is make the assertion at the time of seizure that the property in question was being used in conjunction with a drug operation. But they never have to prove that in court. As I said they never have to charge you with anything. But they will file suit against your property; there are plenty of court cases like "US v. $17.254.38" and I'll let you guess who wins.

      It sucks, but as the only people really directly affected are
      (1) drug dealers
      (2) black people carrying hundreds in cash when their cars are pulled over
      (3) computer geeks
      most people are ignorant of the problem and/or don't see it as a problem.

    10. Re:it would ... by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have recent experience with this (sorry can't give any more details) and typically everything that can be duplicated is duplicated and a copy is given with whoever is pressing charges (I don't believe they give a copy to the defendant but don't quote me on that). The holders of the duplicated data must keep it in a secured and locked place so that during testimony they can honestly swear that they know that noone has changed the data. The Feds can keep their own copies and originals as long as they want/need, and from talking to agents, it seems they make quite a few. But as far as having your data backed up, there is nothing quite like having it taken by the FBI in a raid, and Linus thought FTP was good:)
      Regards,
      Steve
      P.S. He probably will get his stuff back, they are only hesitant to give things back if there was stuff found on any one of the machines. This guy says he's clear so I wouldn't be too worried about it.

    11. Re:it would ... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you don't know from personal experience, then you have no room to talk.

      No one seems to remember what the secret service did to Steve Jackson Games.
      Just for a short on topic refresher here is a quote from the EFF site:
      But now the board was closed down -- the Secret Service physically removed it from Steve Jackson Games on March 1, 1990, and did not return it until sometime in the end of June of that year. All in all, the Secret Service seized 3 computers, 5 hard disks and more than 300 floppies from Steve Jackson Games on that fateful day.

      No criminal charges were ever brought against Steve Jackson Games. Yet, when the computer equipment was returned more than three months after the raid, it appeared that someone inspecting the disks had read and deleted all of the 162 electronic mail messages contained on the BBS at the time of the raid. Not one of the users of the BBS was even under investigation from the Secret Service. Steve Jackson, owner of Steve Jackson Games, was angry. During the three months his systems were under Secret Service investigation, he had to layoff nearly half of his work force. Publication of at least one of his games books was delayed, resulting in loss of revenues to the company. He was written up in Business Week magazine as being a computer criminal. Steve Jackson decided to fight back.


      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    12. Re:it would ... by frost22 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This guy says he's clear so I wouldn't be too worried about it.

      Huh ? I've yet to see a single computer that is completely "clear". Not to mentionm nine of these, probably together with backups going back several years.
      Think about it: did you never ever copy some piece of software ? did you always pay that Microsft tax ? is all your pr0n lily white and safe in every conceivable community ? What about your email archive - what did you discuss ? You sure the feds will "understand" every joke you sent out ? Did you stay clear of all those forbidden topics ? Growing hemp, copying dvds, red or left wing direct action politics, guns or anti guns, computer securtity, encryption, viruses, islam, your hollidays in afghanistan or cuba, or whatever else gets people into jail over there these days ?

      If they want, they can and will keep these machines forever.
      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    13. Re:it would ... by euggie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Out of curiosity: Since you're innocent, would it be possible to sue them in small claims court for damage, and perhaps for lost time and depreciation?

      I am not sure if you can that; even if you are allowed to do that /and/ win, you can't get a whole lot from small claims, and the actual act of collection is also a bitch. But hey, it's better than nothing, right?

    14. Re:it would ... by Qrlx · · Score: 3, Informative

      yes, there's plenty of proof.

      http://www.google.com/search?q=civil+forfeiture

      no so hilarious when you're driving down the street with a thousand bucks to buy a big screen tv, you get pulled over, and the cops take your money because they aribtrarily determine you were going to buy drugs with it.

    15. Re:it would ... by HiThere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If reports of past activities by other "law enforcement" agencies are anything to go on...don't hold your breath. Instead start saving for new equipment. If they ever do bother to return it, it's likely to be many years from now. (And that's assuming that they can't find, or appear to find, anything that could plausibly be interpreted as illegal on it.)

      I suspect that if you are lucky, they'll just forget about it, and some "office of the law" will give it to his kid. If you aren't lucky, they may come back for all of your property and cash. (I might, with some plausibility, be asserted to be involved in something that might be related to gangsterism under some argument. So we must remove anything that you could use to practice your profession, hire a lawyer, or otherwise do something besides live on welfare.)

      I know an MD who's been fighting the DEA for over five years now. It's looking like he may eventually win, since they have essentially no evidence. (I hear his side.) But he's already served time in jail, had all his medical records and computer equipment confiscated. Had his license lifted. Etc. The charge? He prescribed a few more pain killers to cancer patients than the feds decided the patients needed. (The other charges got dropped after the first hearing, when the prosecutor refused to defend the charges.)

      So. He hasn't been found guilty of anything, but his professional live has been destroyed. His license has been lifted. All his possessions have been confiscated. He's served time in jail (without being found guilty!) Etc.

      So. Well, trust them to nicely hand back your computer if you want. But consider yourself lucky if they just forget you. And DON'T expect THEM to consider themselves bound by any laws. Laws are for others.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:it would ... by Qrlx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      maybe you're buying it used from some guy who put an ad in the paper.

      maybe you don't trust the banks.

      maybe you just went to the bank to withdraw the cash and you're buying it from some pawn shop who will give you a better price if you pay in cash.

      there are plenty of reasons why you would carry that much cash around.

    17. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not to mention that even if you're in the clear if you get caught up in something like this the computers are instantly effectively lost which itself can be quite a financial burden.

      I had my computer taken by into custody once, saw it over 2 years later(no charges raised, no compensation paid, and this wasn't in usa).

      What one should do in this kind of situation is that don't admit to anything before you know what you're admitting to, they can easily try to get you to admit something that was effectively impossible to do! REVIEW THOSE STATEMENT PAPERS CAREFULLY(questionnaire logs? anyways the paper that has all the things you're signing as the ones that you said while being questioned) BEFORE SIGNING!

      though personally I happen to think in this case that valve is just full of shit. Can't ship a product, being horrible behind schedule? well let's blame the hackers! (having seen the leaked thing - the engine was not fit for the release dates that were in effect when this was published, the engine must have been behind the schedule for months already so that it should have been very fucking obvious that they were not going to be able to ship it when stated)

      anon for some reason or another..

    18. Re:it would ... by Rufus211 · · Score: 3, Funny

      hrm...1997...Pentium II was released then...

      quite the hacker you were with your 1989 486.

    19. Re:it would ... by Ondo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, forgot to add, SJG got $250,000 in damages from the government for its ill-treatment. $50,000 compensation (subject to taxation as income) and $200,000 for the lawyers. Who really won in this case?

      The Electronic Frontier Foundation. They were the lawyers in said case, which was their first. Hardly a bad result.

    20. Re:it would ... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why the fuck would you ever want to carry that much in cash? Haven't you heard of "credit cards" or "checkbooks" in the USA?

      Yeah, credit cards and checks are a good thing. Much better than carrying large quantities of cash. It's just so ridiculous carrying large amounts of cash that the police should be able to grab it at will.

      Heck, who needs nine computers in their house? It's ridiculous too! Maybe the cops should confiscate those as well?

      In fact, the cops should be able to grab anything suspicious. They should define "suspicious" as anything "unusual". People with mohawks should have their hair took and god help you if you should happen to be dancing in the street with an iPod.

      Maybe if I paint my car hot pink it should be inpounded. My bible too. Because who on earth would be reading on of those _in public_ anyway. I must be hiding drugs in it.

      TW

  4. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    January 15, 2004
    The whole surreal story

    So at 6:30am on January 14th, I woke up to the doorbell buzzing. Not a short lived buzz. Someone had their thumb pressing the button and holding it there. "Fucking drunkard" I thought, and rolled over, intent on ignoring it. It then started a rythmic *buzz* *buzz* *buzz* *buzz*, over and over again. After about 5 minutes battling to get back to sleep, I gave up and got up. Put my pants on, grabbed my sweatshirt, and stumbled off toward the door.

    As I walked down the steps I heard them talking to the nextdoor neighbor, asking him where the landlord lived. I reach the door just as the neighbor's door closes. I compose myself to deal with whatever is behind the door, and open it.

    Immediately there's a flashlight in my eyes. "Are you Chris Toshok?" "Uh, yes" "Mr. Toshok, we're with the FBI. We have a warrant to search the premises." I looked down out of the glare of the flashlight and saw the FBI badge of the long haired blonde woman standing in front of me. I also saw two people behind her, bodies turned sideways so as to present less of a target. Guns drawn? It was too hard to tell really with the glare of the flashlight, but I'm assuming yes.

    I mumbled something about turning on the light so I could see the warrant (pages 1 2 3 4 5)they'd thrust into my hands and turned and groped on the wall for the switch. They all tensed. The light came on, and I looked over the warrant for a second.

    "Please come out here Mr. Toshok," and a hand on my arm pulling me onto the porch. Once I was out on the porch several agents started up the stairs. I said that my roommate was still asleep in bed. They asked his name, I said "Peter". They continued up the steps, yelling his name. "Peter, this is the FBI." "PETER" "PETER, are you awake? this is the FBI"

    I didn't watch it happen but apparently Peter awoke, naked, to a doorway full of FBI agents with guns out, yelling at him to get up. He asked if he could get some clothes on. They said yes. He asked if they could turn on the light so he could see. So Peter got to get dressed under the watchful gaze of government employees. Must have been fun.

    They took Peter to the back of the house, and took me back upstairs to the front of the house, and proceeded to start going through everything in my room and the office.

    I was questioned by the FBI agent in charge and a Secret Service agent at length about the Hungry Programmers, people I used to live with, whether particular people had the capacity/knowledge to do what they were investigating, etc. During the questioning she says "Now we're going to take all your computers." She sees the look on my face and says "Yeah, this is going to be hard for you." I said "uh, when will I get them back?" She said it depends, that they'd try to have them all back as soon as possible, but it depends on if they find anything suspicious on them. If they found contraband (kiddie porn, talk of drugs, or stuff they were actually looking for), that particular computer would never be coming home.

    After the questioning I basically sat in the front room on a folded futon mattress, with at least one agent with me at all times. Sometimes two. At one point I said I really needed to brush my teeth and the SS agent assigned to me at the time walked with me back to the bathroom and stood behind me watching me in the mirror as I brushed my teeth. On my way back down the hall I looked into my room and saw 3 FBI agents rifling through my belongings. One looking at the condoms and stickers in my nightstand, one going through my underwear/sock drawer, and one looking through my books.

    After a lot more sitting in silence in that room, interspersed with tidbits of conversation (an fbi agent asking me about the guitars, talking about the piano lessons in his youth, and how he was kicked in the chest by a horse.) I must say, the SS agents were a lot nicer than the FBI agents. One in particular was pretty cool - we joked a lot about just how absurd the whole thing was

    1. Re:Article text by stevey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Offsite-backups though - the way these things work is that they will take anything that looks technical, and anything that looks like it could store data.

      Hell in some cases they will take your VCR. (I know of some cheap backup systems that write data to video tapes; although I've never seen one in use).

    2. Re:Article text by kathgar1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just store everyone on your C=64! Once they yank the power it's gone!


      (Yes, I know about recovering data from RAM, It's a joke.)

    3. Re:Article text by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As if there were ever doubt any longer that America were a police state ...

      You don't really have any concept of what a police state is, do you?

      These people had a warrant. Issued by a (mostly) impartial judge. They were investigating an actual crime of serious magnitude commited against a company that I, for one, am very grateful for making.

      In a real police state (Nazi Germany, Stalist Russia, etc...), the FBI would not have rung your doorbell at 6:30am. They would not have had a warrant, and they most certianly would not have been civilized while they hauled only some your stuff out the door. They would have kicked down your door at 3am, killed your family, and set your house on fire. All because you belived in the wrong religion, or were the member of the wrong political party.

      FBI raids are not pretty, but like it or not, this is how a fair and just legal system works. When you have to balance the rights of victims and the rights of the accused, nobody comes out happy. I don't know if this guy is guilty or innocent, but he should keep his mouth shut, call a lawyer, and take advantage of every other right that he has. And he can do that because he doesn't live in a police state, he lives in a free country. That's why he's laughing about this whole thing instead of next in line to get his hand chopped off at the local prison.

    4. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ummm .... no. a police state is any country where the cops come over, refuse to let you confirm their identity, show you some papers, take all your shit ... and you let them!!!

      dude just walked off, left his whole apartment to the cops, people he will probably never see again, whose identities he is not allowed to confirm.

      *that* is a police state. when the populace are so apathetic on the subject, that they're willing to just bend over and take it in the ass.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:Article text by rampant+mac · · Score: 2, Funny
      "On my way back down the hall I looked into my room and saw 3 FBI agents rifling through my belongings. One [was] looking at the condoms ... in my nightstand."

      On my way back down the hall I looked into my room and saw 3 FBI agents rifling through my belongings. One [was] looking at the mPlayer & mySQL source code ... in my nightstand.

      Fixed. I don't know how that slipped by the editors...

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    6. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, as much as you may think life is polar, it isn't.

      How do you know a crime was committed in this circumstance?

      How does -he- know he's -actually- a suspect, and this wasn't
      just a con job?

      The cops shouldn't be able to just walk into someones house, un-chaperoned, un-watched, hand over some official documents, and charge off with his posessions while the guy just walks around in the street, in a daze, like some sheep.

      Instead, the cops should bring public representation -with- them, who will observe all activity until the innocent person is able to arrange their own representation to have all details of the incident witnessed.

      That public representative should be there for two reasons: one, legitimacy at face value, of the government in this action, and to provide witness of the entire event -for the innocent person, and for the investigation. Hey, why not give TV camermen a real job and require all police activity of this nature to be taped and archived to absolutely -ensure- justice?

      Then, its no longer a police state, where the cops can do anything they want to any citizen under their suspicion, it is instead a public state where witness is borne, and facts are revealed and recorded every step of the way, from both the investigation and the 'protection of the innocent' perspectives.

      The primary intent of those people walking into that guys house at 6:30am in the morning was to find evidence to prove him guilty of wrong-doing. That was their job, thats what they were there to do. They had gotten up bright and early in the morning, gotten their coffee at Starbucks on the way into work, and went off to interrupt that persons life on the basis of suscpicion.

      There should -also- have been someone there, at the same time, to ensure justice is served to the innocent. These two roles cannot be trusted to a single person.

      It is an open society which promotes the rigorous protection of the innocent more stringently than it prosecutes as completely as possible the guilty.

      Incidentally, a policy of non-secrecy like this one would be good for the whole 'data records' issue too. If there is an item in a database with my name on it, it belongs to me and should be visible to me at any time I request it. Since I believe that the rights of some corporation are not greater than my individual rights, issues of 'business trade secret' are irrelevant.

      Another sign of a 'police state' is 'secret files'. The fact that so many corporations have so many amazingly detailed facts about citizens, none of whom have -any- access to this information, nor recourse over its use and influence on their daily lives, leads to just a few more alarm bells about the current situaton in the US of A, Inc...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    7. Re:Article text by danila · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bullshit. I live in Russia and I have friends whose grandparents were arrested in 1937-1939 by NKVD. I'll tell you about it.

      These people either had a warrant or they had the legal authority to arrest people/search their homes. They were investigating an actual crime of serious magnitude commited against the country (treason, sabotage, espionage) that we (the Soviet people) loved dearly.

      The NKVD would often come at night, but often in the morning or any other time of the day. They either rang or knocked, they didn't break the door. They were civilized and they didn't kill anybody. They also didn't steal any property from the house. People, who were arrested, were taken into jail, where they were treated according to the procedures and with all necessary paperwork. The house was, obviously left intact, no fire. This never happened because you believed in wrong religion (nobody cared much at that time, since a very large fraction of the population was religious) or were the member of the wrong party (there was only one party), but because you were charged with a serious crime, such as conspiring to kill our beloved leader Josef Stalin.

      The point is not, whether the crimes are real or not, it doesn't really matter whether you are sent to gulag for sabotaging a power plant that you didn't or for copying a DVD that you did. What matters is that once the state becomes too powerful, it will gradually transform into a police state and a bit later into a totalitarian police state. That's what is happening in the US.

      The fact that you have rights is irrelevant to whether the country is a police state - you are confusing it with a lawless dictatorship. In a police state you may have rights, but they are trumped by even greater rights of the police. This guy is laughing, but would he if he was accused of assisting terrorists?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  5. WOw by M3wThr33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just when I thought they would let it die down, due to it being a bit more personal and involved, it seems like they went in to full gear.

    But I'm still a bit doubtful that ANY network admin wouldn't notice 11GB of traffic to an outside location on the network.

  6. they were pissed! by ayersrj · · Score: 5, Funny

    how else are they supposed to train their agents with the latest technology if it continues to be held past the release date!

  7. Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by pclminion · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The warrant says they're looking for "internal IP addresses" associated with the machines at Valve. Uh.... what the hell? If it's a private network, the chances of those IPs being the same as the IPs on some other private network are approximately... 100%.

    This is like saying, "The murder victim's last name was Smith, and this guy has a reference to a Mr. Smith in his Rolodex. He must be guilty."

    Sure, what the fuck ever. This is trivially defensible in court.

    1. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by lobsterGun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agent 1: Hey Look! 192.168.1.100! I remember seeing an IP address like that at Valve!

      Agent 2: Looks like we have our man!

    2. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by m0rphin3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of those 'internal' ip addresses was '127.0.0.1' and the culprits had an active connection to that computer when the FBI raided.

      --
      for great justice
    3. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, whatever the FBI has right now isn't enough to fly in court. Their actions say that loud and clear because they didn't slap the cuffs on the guy when they were there.

      In order to be able to grab every device with a hard drive in the house, the FBI has to make some statement to the judge about what they're going to look for on the drive. Clearly, one thread to go on is to search for any logs that mention the internal IP address, and see what follows. Yeah, there's a pretty good chance that there could be a machine on his own home network that has the same internal IP as the machine the break-in happened at Valve, and those are going to be useless matches that are going to have to be thrown out... what the FBI is hoping to find is some communciations program that associates that IP address with a description of "Valve Code Server" or such... that'd be incriminating.

      Yep, the FBI's going fishing. However, they have a right to since they went to a judge and got a warrant. He's clearly a suspect... of course, suspects aren't always guilty, but they're the ones being investigated like they might be...

    4. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny


      I use a /29 (248 subnet mask) in an odd place.

      "What, like the back of a volkswagen?"
      - obligatory Mallrats reference:

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
  8. upwards? by BitchAss · · Score: 4, Funny

    lost upwards of 9 machines

    Um - how many machines did he lose? 1? 5? 8.5?

    --
    Like sex? Read and write about it! Indecent Blogging
  9. Google Cache by OctaneZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is Available of his Weblog entry

  10. FYI... by Bytal · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, Chris Toshok (toshok), the person who wrote up this experience is also one of the head programmers on Ximian's Evolution mail client.

    1. Re:FYI... by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm. As a head programmer I'd imagine he has privledged access to Ximian's machines. Ximian may want to look into data storage if their own computers are taken...

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:FYI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      when do they arrest the people who wrote nautilus?

  11. Little do they know... by robson · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the raid on the Hungry Programmers was the result of a miscommunication between Valve and the FBI -- Valve had actually traced the breakin back to an ip address in Hungary.

    (collective groan)
    Thanks, thank you, I'll be here all week.

  12. external IP addresses by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Boy.... I better delete that 207.173.176.142 off my caching DNS server quick.

    *ding dong*

    Oh no!!! TOOO LATE!!!!!

    Seriously, that's about the dumbest warrent condition ever IMHO.

  13. Wording and tense.. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 5, Interesting
    look at how the summary was phrased "San Fransisco native had his house raided by the FBI and lost...."

    Rather than "FBI agents, acting under a warrant issued due to probable cause having been ascertained, ..."

    welcome to slashdot.

    1. Re:Wording and tense.. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Didn't you know? Geeks are always presumed innocent on Slashdot. Unless they are infringing on the GPL or accused of spamming. Then they are presumed guilty.

      Slashdot is a good example of why a true democracy would be a bad idea. A person can be smart, but people are dumb.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Wording and tense.. by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you have to love the bit about whether the agents had "guns drawn" when he opened the door. There's nothing to suggest they actually did - but by tossing the reference in there, the FBI sounds much more menacing, don't they?

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:Wording and tense.. by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Was that executive action or did it have to be passed partially by congress as well? In other words, there's a lot more people to blame then just Bush. (And they should all be blamed.)

    4. Re:Wording and tense.. by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can't be too careful when you're raiding the homes of suspected hackers. You know they all play those shooting games, like Earthquake and Counter Strike, so they're pretty much trained killers.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    5. Re:Wording and tense.. by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like its standard practise as they don't know what will be behind the next door they knock.

      All a by-product of IT ignorance and calling all "hackers" terrorists regardless if they just hack their own system or download some code or break into the CIA, its all the same to someone with no computer knowledge (ie the police/security services).

      O/T. I had a friend once in the UK (so police never have guns unless its serious) who lived in a shared house. The gasman came to check the meter one day and noticed a firearm on the sofa. Of course it was a plastic model...My friend was sat smoking up in his front room when the door was knocked by 8 policemen with guns asking about "a firearm". He instantly realised what it was, said "ah you mean this", went to pick it up and promptly got jumped on by 5 armed police who thought they were about to get blown away. All got happily sorted in the end, I'd imagine had he been in America he wouldn't be around to tell that tale.

    6. Re:Wording and tense.. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      All got happily sorted in the end, I'd imagine had he been in America he wouldn't be around to tell that tale.

      In America, there would be no tale. It's legal to own guns.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:Wording and tense.. by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the US, people are assumed innocent until proven guilty, especially when they're really nice people who work for respected open-source software companies. Chris Toshok is fairly well-known in the open-source community (I'm amazed the summary didn't mention the he's an Evolution developer). If this happened to someone you knew, and you couldn't imagine them having done it, you'd probably use the same type of language.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    8. Re:Wording and tense.. by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 5, Informative

      Geeks are always presumed innocent on Slashdot. You think that's bad? I hear there's a place called "America" where EVERYONE is presumed innocent until proven guilty! Talk about insane! It must just be a legend.

    9. Re:Wording and tense.. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Whenever a cop shoots someone dead in America, it's big news - particularly if that person is in their own home. In some parts of the country, that's almost guaranteed to spark riots and protests.

      The bullets don't fly here nearly as much as some might expect. :-)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  14. Re:Nothing new... SteveJackson games anyone? by BrianGa · · Score: 5, Informative

    It had something to do with the fact that Steve Jackson was producing a Cyberpunk game.

    More info:
    http://www.boogieonline.com/revolution/express/tec hno/jackson/
    http://www.sjgames.com/SS/
    http://www.eff.org/Legal/Cases/SJG/

  15. HL2 code theft by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Valve tries to make the claim in court that HL2 was postponed until April because of the source code theft, that will become fraud on their part. Until now it was just harmless marketing lies. The delay had little if anything to do with the code theft -- that was only a convenient excuse.

    Someday I would like to see a game company create a game in an open way. They should have all their engine code out in the open so anybody could follow the progress and even contribute if they felt like it. They would not need to make up stuff about release dates because the public could easily find out the status of completion themselves. And if their source code gets stolen by other companies, they can just go all SCO on their asses. On the other hand, they can also make clear that if a hobbiest uses the engine code that they own the copyright. Smart game companies do that last part already.

    All it will take is one brave company to revolutionize the industry. Happens all the time.

    1. Re:HL2 code theft by iii_rjm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And why would I, as a developer, be the least bit interested in some wannabe adding to my codebase. If you are any good and I want your help I will offer you a job. Further, What business is it of anybody in what progress I am or am not making in producing a product that I want to sell. If you can't wait what do I care. If I lose a sale because I am taking to long it's nobodys business or problem but my own.

    2. Re:HL2 code theft by Dalroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Valve tries to make the claim in court that HL2 was postponed until April because of the source code theft, that will become fraud on their part. Until now it was just harmless marketing lies. The delay had little if anything to do with the code theft -- that was only a convenient excuse

      How do you know it didn't affect and delay the product? Do you work for Valve? Where's your proof?

      I can tell you, at my company, if there was a break-in that got all our code, we'd be up shit creek. There would be a complete overhaul of all our processes, interviews with all the personel, new security training, new procedures, a complete audit, and worst of all talented and hard working people would get fired. All of this would take time, affect everybody, and slow every project down.

      I find it hard to belive that Valve didn't go through something similar internally. If you're going to make drastic claims like this, at least provide some proof or reasoning behind your logic.

      Bryan

    3. Re:HL2 code theft by Matt2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      > If Valve tries to make the claim in court that HL2 was postponed until April because of the source code theft, that will become fraud on their part.

      Wrong. Charging Valve with fraud would require that they were somehow illegaly profiting from delaying the release date. Since the product isn't for sale, pray tell how this can be considered fraud under any aspect of law!

      Golly I completely forgot about the 1987 Digital Entertainment act that required game makers to hold to tentative release dates! Bastards!

      >Until now it was just harmless marketing lies.

      What's this? Oh no! A company that markets their product! Where is the justice!

      > Someday I would like to see a game company create a game in an open way. They should have all their engine code out in the open so anybody could follow the progress and even contribute if they felt like it.

      And some day I would like to see all commercial ventures opened up under the watchful eye of a high council of elves, leprechauns, and magical wood faries! Using their arcane magics for the betterment of mankind, we will transform the world into an utopian paridise, where every jack-ninny can voice their opinion equally, even in private commercial and private forums! Lo, in this brave new future disease will be cured, everyone will earn $50K USD annual salary because knowledge is intrinsically designed to be free and open to everyone!

      Viva la revolution!

  16. System working.... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

    The FBI came with a blonde woman agent carrying the warrent and trying to be as nice as they can to a suspect. Let's face it, that's what this guy, and his entire group, appears to be right now.

    You don't need to be proven guilty by any standard to become a suspect. To get a warrant, they do need to present something to a judge, but what that something is usually remains sealed. That's how the system works, there was a due process for taking his property.

    So, the good news for him is so far that the FBI's just fishing on his machines right now. If they find what they're looking for, or anything else very illegal to have, then they'll be back with the cuffs.

    1. Re:System working.... by Alric · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your post touched on a very important topic: If they find what they're looking for, or anything else very illegal to have, then they'll be back with the cuffs.

      What is the legal scope of their search?

      For example, let's pretend this Toshok fellow is completely innocent, and the FBI search of his computers establishes zero link to their original investigation. However, on one computer they find thousands of dollars of unlicensed software and thousands of pirated MP3s and divx vids. Can they confiscate his computer for such an unrelated offense? Can they charge him with a crime? What if during the search of his apartment they found some drugs and an unregistered weapon?

      Exactly where is the line?

    2. Re:System working.... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it really working?

      Is it reasonable to sieze everything (including things not on the list, if his story's true...) in sight on a mere suspicion? Sounds like unreasonable search and siezure to me. Considering that the Hungry programmers aren't the ones that were off and bragging about it, I have a very big suspicion that we're seeing another Steve Jackson Games debacle playing before our eyes. While I'm going to give the Feds some benefit of doubt- it's not a lot, as they're not all lilly-white pure followers of what the law states, including the Constitution and they've been guilty of some rather heinous acts themselves in the relatively recent past.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:System working.... by bssea · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to cases that I've looked at (which isn't many), you are technically wrong.

      I quote:

      United States v. Carey, 172 F.3d 1268, 1270-71 (10th Cir. 1999). In Carey, the Tenth Circuit suppressed evidence of child pornography seized under a warrant authorizing officers to search for evidence of the sale and possession of cocaine. See id. In this case, however, the search at all times remained focused on the seizure of items related to alleged acts of sexual misconduct. At all times the warrants sought only evidence of sexual crimes and the warrants were not disregarded to seize evidence of other, unrelated crimes. The holding in Carey does not apply to this case.

      Source:
      http://www.supremecourt.nm.org/pastopin ion/VIEW/00 ca-062.html

      Number 17.

      So a court *can* suppress evidence found using a search warrant if that evidence is taken using a warrant meant for something different.

      --sea

    4. Re:System working.... by chaoticset · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The FBI came with a blonde woman agent carrying the warrent and trying to be as nice as they can to a suspect. Let's face it, that's what this guy, and his entire group, appears to be right now.

      People unwilling to identify themselves significantly are not, in my opinion, being "nice". As far as these guys know, they were invaded by a bunch of extremely well-organized burglars. The badges mean nothing if you cannot compare them to something else.


      As for the "fishing"...if he's got anything deeply encrypted on those machines, he'll never get them back. Period.

      --

      -----------------------
      You are what you think.
    5. Re:System working.... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      The proper thing to do would be once they stumble into the first signs that there's likely to be a trove of kiddie porn on a general hacking suspect's computer would be to run back to the judge and basically say: "While we were searching for X, we opened up the C:\ drive icon on the system and discovered a folder labelled 'kiddie porn'. Based on that label at face value, it's highly likely that illegal child pornography is in that directory. Can we have an expanded scope to go looking into that?" New warrant gets issued... and everything's clean...

    6. Re:System working.... by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's an interesting case, but if you read further, it sounds like the proper way to proceed is for the investigator to seek an expanded warrant, when he/she first finds unrelated, yet criminal material. In the Carey case, the officer found kiddie porn, and diverted his search from drug-related files to assessing how much illegal porn was on the machine, going outside the scope of his warrant. If he had stopped right away and sought another warrant, it would have been OK.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    7. Re:System working.... by jratcliffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The key issue for search warrants related to physical (i.e. non-cyber) evidence is "plain sight." In other words, if the cops get a warrant to search your apt for drugs, and you have an illegal machine gun lying on the kitchen table, that's admissable. If they've got a warrant to search for drugs, and they find kiddie porn on your (turned-off) computer, that likely wouldn't be admissable, since there's no way that a search for packets of white powder could reasonably involve booting up the PC.

    8. Re:System working.... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What else would they show him? They announced their identity as FBI agents, produced their badges, and showed him the search warrant, while standing outside his domicile. They didn't do a no-knock, they didn't force their way in, they didn't threaten him or rough him up in any way. Just what constitutes "identify[ing] themselves significantly" in your world?

      2 items (though I'm not the previous poster, obviously), assuming that his account was correct:

      1) They pulled him outside to let the agents get into the building. This certainly isn't rough treatment, but it's also not the way a search warrant is supposed to be carried out. They're not permitted, in any way, to remove you from your home.

      2) They refused to allow him to have any form of identification from them, though he didn't try to copy down their names and badge numbers (at least he didn't state he tried to do so, he did ask for pictures of them/their badges, which seemed a rather strange thing to ask, though useful in the event that you need to report your stuff stolen by a bunch of people claiming to be agents).

      Frankly, the guy also waived a number of his rights during the search, which is his own fault for not having a lawyer on the way (or someone calling a lawyer for him) the minute he saw the FBI and USSS at his door. You should never consent to a search or any part of a search just because they have a warrant. The warrant gives them specific areas they can search and specific things they can search for, any consent may expand the area and/or items they can search. You also do not have to consent to an interview with them, and do not have to answer their questions (though it's best to answer questions relevant to the search authorized by the warrant, as being too stubborn may lead to obstruction of justice). Anyway, get a lawyer, as quickly as possible, as this person should have. Leaving was definitely a bad idea beyond all else, and was his problem, not any fault of the officers and agents involved.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  17. I think... by Caseyscrib · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe its just Sierra in FBI jackets.

    The evil has spread.

    =)

  18. Did he say hes not guilty? by slash-tard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did he say he doesnt know anyone involved, or they didnt use his computers?

    I read the mirror and I didnt see anything about it. If hes guilty, or did have anything to do with this then they should be able to take his computers and serve a search warrant. Try looking at this from law enforcements perspective. Im not some Nazi who supports gestapo like law enforcement either, I just didnt read anything that seemed wrong to me.

  19. I don't visit the Games section often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But the Secret Service should be raiding whoever came up with this color scheme!

  20. Ouch. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Poor bastard got Steve Jacksoned.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  21. These aren't the IP addresses you're looking for by Durandal64 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... any IP addresses related to any of the Valve internal or external networks... Valve passwords and/or usernames... any and all items... related to Valve Software, Half-Life, Half-Life 2
    They were looking for IP addresses? What does that mean? I can find any IP address I want from any machine connected to the internet.

    I can just imagine some clueless FBI agent rifling through the poor guy's Rolodex and demanding that he tell them where his IP addresses are. "Sir, where do you keep your IP addresses sir?! This isn't a joke, son! You think this is funny?! Keep it up punk! You can laugh at the judge when we tell him that you wouldn't tell us where your IP addresses were!"
  22. Special Half-Life level by Code-Ex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will Half-Life have a special "FBI Raid" level when it is released? =)

  23. Re:Hungry? by pclminion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Considering that Hungarians actually refer to their country as "Magyarorszag," not "Hungary," I'd say it doesn't really fucking matter how you spell it, since it isn't even the actual name of their country.

    And it still doesn't equate to not knowing what's going on in the world -- it just means somebody doesn't know how to spell. Duh.

  24. Out of curiosity..... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How many times has Slashdot been approached by law enforcement agencies to obtain access to records or postings?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Out of curiosity..... by wcdw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Since the FBI can investigate anyone - without a warrant - and with a built-in gag order, you'll never know the answer to that question. And it is against the law for /. to tell you.

      Is this a great country, or what?

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    2. Re:Out of curiosity..... by dgp · · Score: 3, Informative

      the last couple fbi-power-expanding laws include being able to gag the raided company from answering just such questions.

    3. Re:Out of curiosity..... by (trb001) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, as other posts have noted, if /. has been approached, and a gag order been put in place, then Taco can't you ("I can not divulge..."). However, if it hasn't happened, he should be able to tell you that it has never happened. So it's more a boolean thing rather than a number-of-times thing.

      --trb

  25. Poor guy is screwed. by xankar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the future, if he's ever unemployed, that warrant will be a big ugly red mark that will deter employers from hiring him.

    I knew someone whose ex-wife accused him of abuse because she hated him. He never came close to being convicted, but he hasn't been able to get a job since.

    You don't have to be convicted to be branded a criminal.

    --
    ~To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. -Yann Martel
    1. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Qeantk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think they can legally ask if you have ever had a warrant out for your arrest. Don't job applications ask about "convicted" at most?

  26. A few questions for anyone with experience by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you are found innocent...

    a) What countermeasures/damages can you persue

    b) If your computers are for business use, can you sue for lost revenue?

    c) If they find something illegal (who doesn't have a "hack for program x" or keygen etc), but it is found that they came after you mistakenly, are your computers still lost?

    d) You got no card, how can you call to find out about your stuff?

    e) 9 computers, decent chance one is a server. How about if the server was hacked (cmon, if they hack valve wouldn't they redirect through dummy servers)

    1. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by forkboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As Steve Jackson will tell you, this guy is pretty much screwed. Anything they seize in the course of an investigation is pretty much theirs now and there's nothing you can do about it. Federal Law Enforcement is basically untouchable. Welcome to Amerika.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re: A few questions for anyone with experience by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Interesting


      > If they find something illegal (who doesn't have a "hack for program x" or keygen etc),

      Don't the rules limit them to using what was specified on the warrant? Otherwise it's too easy to use a warrant for something trivial as the justification for a fishing expedition.

      Of couse, in these days of the all-important War on Blacks^wDrugs and War on Arabs^wTerror, the rules don't seem to matter very much.

      > but it is found that they came after you mistakenly, are your computers still lost?

      AFAICT, you might as well kiss your stuff goodbye even if you're innocent. Remember the outcome of the clueless cop's crusade against Steve Jackson Games?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by *weasel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IANYourLawyer
      IANYourLegalCounsel

      a) none. Unless they went beyond legal procedure. (harassment, malicious prosecution, vandalism, etc). In this case it sounds like they were well within procedure.

      b) Your legal fees will be excessive, your lost time will kill more revenue than your loss of machines, and you won't get a dime unless you can prove they wrongfully prosecuted or acted on a tip they knew to be bad. You can try, but if that revenue/hardware really mattered, you'd be a dead company long before it is settled. Ask Steve Jackson Games.

      c) Yep. Though a 'hack for program x' is likely within your legal right to possess and/or create. proof of distributing or using it is the damning part.

      I don't know what the impact of the DMCA is on copyprotection schemes prior to its enactment, so it may be possible that a sufficiently old classic (eg winzip95 keygen) might be technically legal, even if applied. it's still not a good idea legally to have it though.

      any pirated software would certainly not be legal. pirating software is a civil crime (if you're not selling it) but possession of that contraband is enough to keep your box forever, even if charges are never brought against you for the crime. They likely won't be shaking you down for your windows license, but if you cause a stink all they have to do is request licenses and proof of ownership to dissuade you from pressing the issue.

      but yeah, 90% of /.-ers probably have at least 1 item of contraband - meaning they'd never see their machines again. that's the risk factor for partaking in victimless crimes - even if you're innocent of something serious - kiss your hardware goodbye.

      d) He'll have received a seizure receipt (he'll have to sign that) with case number and lot number. all the items they take will be itemized. He can inquire about them at any time, though the legal process is slow - and your hardware will be obsolete long before you get them back.

      e) there's already a precedent for that, so it might be a plausible defense. Provided of course the prosecution doesn't simply disprove it by having an expert witness inspect the machine.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  27. Fact or Fiction? by faust13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When did a weblog become fact? I understand they had scanned documents, but I just get very nervous about allowing blogs to become sources of fact.

    1. Re:Fact or Fiction? by rplacd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The scanned documents list an FBI (or is it SS?) agent's name, and a judge's name. You can look them up online -- I understand that the judge really does exist and lives/works somewhere in Bay Area.

      I doubt that they'd be happy seeing their name on a fake search warrant. That's the type of stuff that gets you thrown in jail.

  28. Here's an interesting idea by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With multiple companies hoping IPv6 enabled home appliances will be in the "home of the future", will search warrents looking for Internet devices mean the feds will be seizing everything from your fridge, toaster, and can opener?

    The debate over that ought to be interesting.

    1. Re:Here's an interesting idea by Robotdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Can I at least keep the beer?" -Negative, we have to question it.

    2. Re:Here's an interesting idea by jaysones · · Score: 2, Funny

      By the time HL2 comes out, you'll have to upgrade your toaster to play.

  29. A bit torn by muzzynat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, I have to say, that would be the absolute worst morning of my life if it was me, the kind of stress that could give a guy an ulcer. He seems to be handling things pretty well though which is good. Nobody wants the FBI and Secret Service Raiding their home, no matter what.

    However that said, and my condolences to his lost PCs, if he is resposible for stealing the HL2 code, he kinda did deserve it, because I for one am a little pissed about the delay, and if he's guilty I guess karma(and not the /. kind) is biting him in the ass. I don't really care if Valve was using Outlook, If i hang a bed sheet over my door, and you walk in and take my stuff, you're still breaking and entering, even if the bedsheet wasn't the most secure door I could have used.

    --
    "I am the Flail of God!" -Genghis Kahn
    1. Re:A bit torn by Enucite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      because I for one am a little pissed about the delay

      The person who copied the code wasn't the cause of the delay.

      The actual cause of the delay was Valve not being anywhere near finished.

  30. Yes, in fact; Lesstif. by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, you meant done for them, not done to them; my mistake!

  31. Now here's a question worth asking... by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Toshok is so concerned about what's being taken from his apartment, and he hasn't done anything wrong, then why does he leave during the search and go to a friends place to "spread the word"? Something doesn't add up there.

    If I hadn't done anything wrong, I'd stick around to see what's being confiscated. It seems like this guy's first priority was to sound an alarm...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by pclminion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If I hadn't done anything wrong, I'd stick around to see what's being confiscated.

      No point in doing that. They give you a receipt for anything they take, and they can't use and item as evidence in court without first proving that they gave you a receipt for that item. So everything they touched is going to be clearly itemized.

      It seems like this guy's first priority was to sound an alarm...

      Makes sense to me.

      "Hey guys. I thought I'd let you know, there's a bunch of cops searching my apartment right now, so if I end up missing by the end of the day, you'll know what happened. In that case, could you please call a lawyer for me?"

      It's the kind of thing friends tell each other, don't you think?

    2. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If I hadn't done anything wrong, I'd stick around to see what's being confiscated. It seems like this guy's first priority was to sound an alarm...

      If I was being raided and hadn't done anything wrong, I'd want to get the word out to friends, since whatever mistakenly pointed them toward me is likely to also point toward friends.

      Since these raids tend to take everything, including stuff that is obviously not useful as evidence (what kind of evidence are they going to find in power cables, or in pressed music CDs?), I'd want to give my friends a chance to get that kind of stuff out of the house.

      Give me 10 minutes warning that the FBI is coming, and I can have a recent backup safely offsite, so when they are gone, and I get a new computer, I can be back up and running fast. Note that this in no way would hurt their investigation. I could also grab things like my external DVD writer, DSL modem, sound card, and stuff like that, so that would be less to replace.

  32. Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by danidude · · Score: 4, Funny

    root@loot:~# cd stolen_stuff/
    root@loot:~/stolen_stuff# ls
    windowssrc.tar.gz half_life2.tar.gz eletronic_votinghck.tar.gz
    root@loot:~/stolen_stu ff# scp half_life2.tar.gz dood@hackr.kr:
    dood@hackr.kr's password:
    half_life2.tar.gz 100% 00:00
    root@loot:~/stolen_stuff# rm -f half_life2.tar.gz
    root@loot:~/stolen_stuff# ^D
    logout

    --
    - no sig.
  33. Sounds Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So 6:30 must be their favorite time for these types of raids. I woke up in 1994 to FBI, SS, Sheriff's Dept, US Attorney's office standing over my bed.

    They gave me a SS baby sitter too, and we sat in the kitchen watching Weird Science. I went up to my room at one time to gather my backpack for my 2nd day of Univ and saw the same thing, as they disassembled my machines, flipped through all of my books, etc. They actually went out to my car and took my cell phone.

    Never expect to see your machines again, or if you do, they'll be 10 years out-dated. My friend got his C64's and 128's back about the time the 486/66 came out.

  34. Re:Copying, not theft by mpost4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I Belive that now copying something is considered theft by law. I do not agree with this, but if they have now defined it as theft, they are legaly correct in that statement, even if theoricly they are not right.

  35. Xbox Controllers by ad0gg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want to know why they seized his xbox controllers? How the fuck is that evidense?

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:Xbox Controllers by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I want to know why they seized his xbox controllers?

      Halo LAN party in the evidence locker. Why else?

    2. Re:Xbox Controllers by Psychotext · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't help feeling that it would be even cooler to hide a bluetooth memory stick somewhere (Maybe the lining of a curtain or something) and use that for all your dodgyness. Sure, you'd need to pull it out to change the batteries now and again but it's still quite a neat little trick.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
  36. Real encryption anyone? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny


    As Khan would say, "Let them meet static!".

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Real encryption anyone? by Jobby · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's let them eat static. Idiot.

    2. Re:Real encryption anyone? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whatever.

      --
      This is my sig.
  37. Seizure seizures by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Really the question is if you ever get your machines back.
    Judging from every story I've ever read, the Feds always hang onto "evidence" machines for years upon years. Which is effectively the same as confiscating them. Good reason to have offsite backups -- unless they take those too.

    In other threads, people have suggested that the Feds didn't understand how IP addresses work, and raided the wrong network. I suppose that's possible, but I think it unlikely, especially since they must know about the crack being traced to a user in Europe. It's more likely that they know or suspect that the HP guys have copies of the stolen source, and the raid is just a way to "send a message" to others who might consider downloading it.

    Technically, computers get seized so the cops can gather evidence, which is supposed to lead to some kind of punishment if all the due process requirements are met. But as often as not, the seizure itself is the only punishment metted out, and is obviously meant as such. Which is pretty scary, when you consider your total lack of recourse when you are punished in this manner.

    1. Re:Seizure seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      My friend had his computer seized by the FBI freshman year of college (including his speakers, oddly), they gave it back to him in 6 months.

    2. Re:Seizure seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      hopefully i'm not using the same IPs as the ones they are looking for.

      192.168.69.0/24
      10.69.69.0/24

      anyone on the inside know if i should start changing these addresses? i would find it rather annoying if i get raided simply because i'm a programmer and have networks "on" the same network addresses.

    3. Re:Seizure seizures by arf_barf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The company I worked for got their computers "taken". This happend in 97, the suit has been settled out of court in 99 and they still haven't received any equipment back. And at this point it would cost more in lawyer fees then it's worth it (including all their data)

    4. Re:Seizure seizures by ehvoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe the machines had references to IP addresses in the 10.x.x.x range, valve's internal subnet. Looks like this guy is guilty

    5. Re:Seizure seizures by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps you should ssh into 127.0.0.1 and restart your humour daemon.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    6. Re:Seizure seizures by JInterest · · Score: 2, Informative

      To the contrary, you clearly have a recourse. It is called the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which plainly prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. You have the right to hire a lawyer, go to court, and force them to either demonstrate that they have good cause to retain the machines or else to turn them over. You have a claim for damages should it turn out that they didn't have a good basis for retaining the machines. You have a recourse. Most people won't exercise it however, because they have to pay a lawyer for assistance, although if you are in fact entitled to recover for the malfeasance of officialdom, you can recover your attorney's fees.

    7. Re:Seizure seizures by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I had heard of the 5th amendment. Sounds like a real good idea. Enforcing it would seem to be problematic.

      Your theory about how the courts work is very interesting. If your theory is valid, all you need is determination, and you're sure to get adequate damages from any government agency that abuses your constitutional rights. But theories, no matter how well constructed, can only be validated or invalidated by testing them in the real world. Judging from all the news I've read about computer seizures, you need a new theory.

    8. Re:Seizure seizures by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [Lawyer to Judge] Your Honor, my client wishes to compel the authorities to show good cause, or to return his seized computer equipment.
      [Judge to Lawyer] Get bent.
      [Lawyer to Client] That'll be $20,000. I'll bill you. Have a nice day.

      woo. Justice in action.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  38. Chris' call to Valve by xorbe · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hi, Valve? Yeah, this is Chris Toshok. Yeah, I got no computers to play your next game on, you know? Not your problem you say? Just a sec... I'm adding a couple new obfuscated filters to Evolution..."

  39. XP CD Key by MirgNave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone notice they took down his XP CD-KEY for his Dell laptop? That key is toast now!

  40. Found Innocent? by w.p.richardson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aren't you supposed to be innocent until proven guilty in San Francisco?

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

  41. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Such a beast already exists...
    http://dban.sourceforge.net/
    YMMV, enjoy

  42. In GW's america by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're guilty until confirmed guilty in a court of law.

    There are no innocents.

  43. Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    You almost never get the shit back. Half the reason for only having $300 used eBay computers at your house/apt/dorm. You don't want them stealing your $3500 Alienware rig or the setup you just built with $1000 of parts from Pricewatch, or your shiny new Apple G5 or G4 TiBook.

    I've been popped before. All because I had a fake CNN web page made, a few months before the 'CNN fake news generator' got popular. It wasn't even hosted on my home systems!

    The FBI was waiting for me one day when I walked outside my apartment to go to work. They marched me right back upstairs. They asked me a few questions and took the following:

    White box AMD 800mhz that I built from spare parts. Old Powermac 8600. Old Pentium II-233MHz.

    They did not, however, take my mice/keyboard/monitors, they did take the Mac stuff though.

    They also did not take every floppy disk and CDROM I had in the house. You always used to hear news stories with headlines like "OVer 5,000 disks siezed in piracy raid" in the early years of home computers.

    As the agent was leaving, my roomates newer Compaq laptop caught his eye, but I told him that machine wasn't mine and he didn't question me.

    They have you sign a bunch of crap, and they write down serial numbers, give you copies of everything...This was about 3 years ago too.

    I called the FBI offices, sometimes once a month. They would never return my calls, and always were telling me things were transfered to another office, etc. Originally I was told that they would be done with my stuff in 6-8 weeks.

    After a while, I figured no news was good news, and didn't want to even deal with them any more over $500 worth of computers.

    Ironically, I had to help the FBI/Customs on a case they were working on, someone in our office was looking at kiddie porn from a work computer. Figure they'd be looking out for me but that's the government for you.

    Now, on the other hand, your police departments are a little better. My friend had his computer missing for nearly 6 months, and when he got it back it was covered in identifcation stickers but it was pretty much the way it was when they took it.

    Posting as AC, of course.

  44. Who knows... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're sure as hell not going to see something like this get presented by news outlets. Not sensational and it's just some geeks getting busted for hacking, afterall... Never mind that while due process might have been done, it may still be an unreasonable search and siezure of his property by virtue of the fact that they had little real worth to go on and used PATRIOT or something similar to rush a warrant through the courts. Since I don't know the whole story, I'm not going to venture a guess either way- but to ask me to think of it as fiction just because it's a blog is a bit much as well.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  45. offsite backups! by theCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We just added another reason (you needed another?) to keep your important code and data resources backed up and stored in a secure off-site facility.

    The FBI/SS/Interpol can take anyone's machine anytime they want to and hold it forever, even just looking for emails that might be from someone you might know who might have committed a crime. You get email, right? And bits of interesting code? From a lot of people some of whom are developers, right? You know what all of them are up to all the time? Well you are in their email addressbook so maybe you should know.

    The dark side social networking...

    As things go, and as companies become even more litigious than they already are, I suspect that such loss of equipment and code to search and seizure might become as likely as catastrophic earthquake, fire or flood. Anyone in the code business better wisen up and assume that everything in your dev suite could be named in the next search warrant.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  46. The interesting part by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To me the most interesting part of the story is this line:

    I was questioned by the FBI agent in charge and a Secret Service agent at length about the Hungry Programmers, people I used to live with ...

    So he lived with people of the same racial background of those commonly believed to have been involved with the break in. I know that being of the same racial background dose not make them guilty, but it does raise some red flags as to were the probable cause came from. Come to think of it he never really bothered to say he was innocent or anything in the article. And the bit about the wolves circling or what ever makes him sound even more suspicious.

    --
    man .sig
    No manual entry for .sig.
    1. Re:The interesting part by thebatlab · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm..it's hungry not Hungary.

      At least that's what I got out of it. I thnk it's just a group of programmers not necessarily of the same racial background.

  47. Halflife by sm0yby · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone know what the halflife of a search warrant is?

    --
    Been modded interesting, insightful and funny. Why does real life have to be so different?
  48. Depends... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're in shock, you might not be thinking. Also worth mentioning is that you might not want to be around anyway- the agents are going to take things from your property and since they're armed, are you going to try to stop them from taking something NOT covered by the Warrant? I, personally, wouldn't want to be about unless I had to be- the stress of seeing them take my stuff and me being absolutely POWERLESS to prevent any of it would drive me physically ill.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  49. Cryptographic filesystem by suso · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like someone needs to use a cryptographic filesystem.

    1. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by hyperstation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but what if i "forgot" the passphrase? what if it was stored in a hardware key that they didn't find or was stored elsewhere?

      would invoking the 5th amendment at this point fly? i mean, if the answer is in my head, they can't really seize that now can they?

    2. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by damiam · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It generally doesn't work to tell them, "I encrypted the entire contents of my hard drive, and I remembered the password every single time I used it, and it's only a coincidence that I'm forgetting it just now." Even if you could sell that, they would still press you for info (did it have numbers? was it someone's name? how did you choose it?), which you would definately remember (barring a lobotomy).

      In any case, a normal-length passphrase (8 chars or less) could get brute forced fairly easily. If it was a longer key stored in hardware (and they didn't have the hardware), they would ask you where it was, and refusing to tell them would not be a good idea.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by liquidsin · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Well, officer, the usb key *was* plugged into the computer when you confuscated it, so I guess you must have it somewhere. What? No, sorry, that was the only copy..."

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  50. Re:What I need by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Psh... that's amateur stuff. What you need is some thermite. ;)

  51. Comments by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The comments are the amazing part to me. You'd think people savvy enough to have read this story would be bright enough to understand why they absolutely HAVE to take the computers, not sit there dicking around trying to pull hard drives out.

  52. The incident by wiredog · · Score: 3, Interesting
  53. Another Mirror. by SiGiN · · Score: 2, Informative
  54. This man was an idiot. by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, points for keeping his composure I guess, but no points whatsoever for intelligence. He seriously just wandered off to take a walk while they were going through his apartment?!

    Folks? If this ever happens to you? CALL YOUR LAWYER. Not the next day, not the day after, but the instant you can convince them to let you get your hands on a phone. If you don't have a lawyer, call a friend that you trust to find you a lawyer.

    It's all well and good that the raiders in this case were relatively polite and friendly, but once the legal system takes notice of you in this way, Mister Policeman is no longer your friend. They have a job to do, and that job is to put your ass in jail. If being nice to you helps them to do this, they'll be nice. If scaring you senseless helps them to do this, they'll do that too. But the fact remains: they are not paid to catch someone who they know for a fact is guilty; they are being paid to catch someone they can convince a District Attorney is guilty, and those are two very, very different things.

    If you are ever in this situation, the only words that come out of your mouth when speaking to the feds should be "I'd like to call my attorney." His job is to keep you out of jail.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:This man was an idiot. by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just so you know, they don't have to let you see your lawyer or speak to your lawyer during the search. The only rule about seeing a lawyer is during a custodial interrogation (ie, you're under arrest). If you then ask for a lawyer, then anything you tell the cops after that is inadmissible as direct evidence against you. Those statements, however, would be admissible in court as rebuttal evidence to contradict your own testimony in court later.

      But sure, calling your lawyer at that point in time is a pretty good idea. But how many people have criminal defense lawyers on call, anyway? Besides former Enron executives?

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    2. Re:This man was an idiot. by chmod000 · · Score: 3, Informative
      They did make clear that he wasn't in custody, early on. And they did allow him to leave the premises, too.


      I just wonder why he didn't start calling lawyers first, even before brushing his teeth. It's not like they would be offended by his geeky halitosis over the phone. "The system", as a whole, is not out to get you, but when something like this occurs, you can be sure that certain people within the system definitely ARE. You need somebody else in that system on YOUR side. That's the way it works.


      As to having a criminal lawyer "on call", not necessary. Just call the first one you find and ask for a referral if your case is not his cup of tea. You can change lawyers if you need to, but it's like changing majors in college. Do it early, if at all.

      --
      Aptal soru yoktur; sadece merakli aptallar vardir.
    3. Re:This man was an idiot. by mandolin · · Score: 2, Funny
      I would have to say any number of former presidents of the USA, almost ALL politicians in my home state of AZ, professional criminals and of course, lawyers. (would you consider the last two redundant?)

      Actually, most of those terms are redundant.

  55. Re:Nothing new... SteveJackson games anyone? by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 2, Informative

    That was the main bit, yeah. But as it turns out, an employee there at the time was associated with the Legion of Doom hacker group - some of which were the folks who got a copy of Bellsouth's E911 document, which Bellsouth tried to claim was worth hundreds of thousands of dollars (basically by adding up all of the man-hours logged, AND the cost of every computer used to type the thing up). Operation Sun Devil (which the SJG raid was a part of) was primarily focused on this issue, IIRC.

    The funny bits I remember about that whole episode was SJG telling the SS guy "This is a game" and the guy insisting "No, this is real."

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
  56. why they took cd's, and why he told his friends by dAzED1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    reading these posts, there are two questions that have REALLY obvious answers. I'll give them anyway, since they seem to be stumping so many people.

    cds: its just policy. One can make a burned cd look pressed if they really want to. Instead of wasting time inspecting each cd, just take them all. Fairly simple.

    why he told friends: Some may be students, who have their school work on their systems, but won't see those systems for years if they get taken. Some may be have files of business importance - perhaps they were writing a program for a company, perhaps they have an extensive cvs repository sitting on a server. Perhaps its just business contacts, or hell - email archives.

    There are a LOT of things that will screw up your life for months, if not years, if you suddenly lose it. Keep in mind that while you may make backups, those backups will be taken as well. Offsite backups even will be, if they know about them (which more and more lately, they will know).

    Think about what would happen if all of your computers, backups, media, and etc all disappeared in an instant. If you're 100% innocent, it will still take a couple of years to get things back. In our tech-dependent world, that's a long time to be in hell for no reason.

  57. Re:What I need by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not just use an encrypted file system?

  58. Re:What if you're not guilty... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In order for them to get a search warrant, the FBI must present ample causation to a judge. Checks-and-balances are supposed to help prevent fishing expeditions.


    BZZZT! Wrong answer, thank you for playing.

    If you haven't been paying attention, Congress has been essentially eliminating most of those checks and balances for some time now. And we've been letting them do it to us. If you don't believe me, look CLOSELY at the PATRIOT Act. Don't need probable cause for warrant or even the warrant for a search and siezure if they label you as a terrorist. The law allows the FBI that privilege, in violation of the Fourth Ammendment- and they've been using it. The law also gives the FBI the right to arrest you and treat you as a foriegn national if you're labeled a terrorist- no due process or anything inconvienient like that. And they've used those features too.

    Anyone that thinks that the checks and balances are currently being acknoleged as being anything much more than toilet paper is sadly deluded.
    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  59. Hacker, not a gamer by lonb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly this person was only in it for the programming -- if they were a real gamer, they could've TOTALLY strifed out of the way of the feds.

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
  60. Re:What I need by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because you'd be ordered by a judge to turn over the key, and "I forgot what the key is" or "I lost it" would get you thrown in jail for contempt and obstruction.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  61. Half Life 2 for sale in russia by lub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to this article Half Life 2 has been translated into Russian, compiled, and is for sale on the shelves of a Russian trader in Novosibirsk.

    Sack the sigs

  62. Re:dealing with the fbi by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Secondly, expect to be watched. They will tap your phones, house, install a gps tracking device in your vehicle, for at least the first few weeks after the raid.

    You know, I was wondering if that guy that he drove over too, while the fuzz was doing their thing, is going to get a knock in his door in the next few days....

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  63. valve customer by moojin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    from the search warrant, it looks as though just about anybody who has bought a valve product (valve software or manuals) or even just surfed over to their website (ip address in web browser history) or contacted anybody at their office via email (product support) would qualify for a visit from the secret service / fbi.



    a law must be enacted where computers can not be held for a certain period of time (5 business days) unless charges are brought up against the owner. the 5 days would give the confiscator enough time to copy the hard drives on the machines. if not, why should the citizen be responsible for the time it takes the secret service / fbi to analyze the contents of a hard drive. this kind of reminds me of the ibm sco case.

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  64. SS and FBI raid for game code? by js62 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when is game code that important? WTF is in the game that got the feds involved. How does Valve rate this kind of assistance? Shit gets stolen everyday and nothing like this ever happens. Anyways if this guy has half a brain he has backed up the important shit offsite like all good coders should do. As an offtopic thought, I wonder how they would do against Apple's filevault? Would they be able to crack it?

  65. Computer laws are messed up by jdhutchins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The nation's computer hacking laws are really messed up. You get ACCUSED of hacking, they take all your electronics (all of them, tv's, vcr's, etc). If you get convicted, you never seem them again. Even if it was your wife's computer, she'd be sans that computer (and all the data on the hd). If don't get convicted, all bets are off as to what happens to your data.

    Let's say you get convicted. You get, let's say, 10 years in the slammer. You get out, and are not allowed to touch a computer for a while, and when you are, it's even longer before you can use internet, email, etc. You aren't allowed to make any profit (write a book, work in computer security) from computers. Your life (computers) has been taken away from you.

    Now, let's say you murdered someone. It wasn't a bad murder, you got off with 20 years. You get out, you can't legally buy guns (but you can still have access to them). Other than a black mark on you record (which you have with computer crimes anyways), your life is relatively back to normal.

    Computer crimes should be more civil (fines) rather than criminal. The problem is a lack of education in lawmakers about computers (in general too). They're scared to death of hackers, and want to stop hackers, but probably don't realize how little effect their laws have.

    1. Re:Computer laws are messed up by db10 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's gay. programmers don't give a shit, they get paid the same $$$ (usually crap pay for game programmers) regardless. The rights of the SUSPECTS should be held sacrosanct until proven guilty. Arson endangers lives, fool. A potential hacker just highlights the need for better better security. Now put your panties back on and regain a measure of self respect.

  66. What I want to know... by michrech · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is why they are called the "Secret Service" when they aren't, well, secret...

    =]

    --
    bork bork bork!
  67. Here's the part I liked by beacher · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The blonde FBI agent was nice (and annoying) enough to tell me repeatedly that the judge would go easier on me (and they could all go home earlier) if I would just tell them where the stuff was. If I had it, of course. But if I denied having it, they'd really throw the book at me *when* they found it."

    The prosecution and defense attourneys are the only ones that can do sentance negotiation / mediation. This line is *often* used by cops on evedince fishing trips. It's legal because he *isn't* in custody and not under formal interrogation.
    I agree though - Call the lawyer.

  68. Filevault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get FileVault for OS X. Never get caught, assuming you use a big password.

  69. Why you should calibrate your monitors by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The exact address is blacked out in these scans, but if you have your monitor calibrated properly, you can see the censored parts of page 3 shining through in page 2. Of course on uncalibrated monitors, which they presumably used to scan these documents, you only see white.

    Another reason to calibrate your monitors before creating stuff that you publish :-)

  70. On Moving to Canada.... by waltc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was amused to see numerous "move to Canada" suggestions, as well as "America is a police state" warnings provided to this person in comments relating to this person's allegations as printed on the person's web site. Evidently I was misinformed when told that Canada, and, indeed, every civilized nation on earth, has prisons full of convicts who got there as a result of being arrested by the police, including some who were convicted in trials by the weight of evidence seized with search warrants.

    I'm in debt to those authentically brainy people who've set me straight about Canada, reminding me that Canada has no laws, no prisons, no convicts, no courts or trials, no police, and of course...no such thing as search warrants. And I guess the same is true of other European nations whose citizens reacted with shock and horror at this person's account, because like Canada, those nations, too, have no laws to break, no courts to convict, and of course no police forces to serve search warrants, not to mention no judges to sign such a warrant even if such a thing was possible in those countries. Yes, thanks to all of the "big brains" out there who have enlightened me in my ignorance. Naturally, if you hail from a country with no laws and no police and no search warrants, such a tale would have to inspire nothing short of dread and terror and a certain specter of a "police state."

    And, too, I have to bow to the indisputable logic of those who insist that Valve has no moral right whatever to be incensed that its servers were broken into and its source code stolen--rather, as these people most brilliantly postulate for my poor benefit, Valve would be better served by throwing a party for the hackers, congratulating them an a job well done, and even, possibly, mailing them a big fat check for the service these unselfish, altruistic hackers have done them. How foolish of me to think it natural to want to involve the police when one's personal property is stolen--how foolish, indeed. Double foolish, really, but what can one expect from a poor underling such as I who has been raised in a country with laws, prisons, crimes, and search warrants? Since other countries, like Canada, have no need for such primitive mechanisms, it's no wonder I thought of this issue as I originally did. Woe is me.

    But, to tell you the absolute truth, until I see some independent corroboration of the events alleged to have taken place, I must wonder if...

    (a) Such alleged events ever occurred

    (b) Such events occurred for the purpose this person has alleged

    Even though I am not all that bright, really, as you can tell from my misapprehensions as to other countries having laws and prisons and search warrants, it nevertheless seems to me that...

    (1) It is a simple thing to manufacture, or change, such "search warrants," using commonly available programs such as Photoshop

    (2) It would be a simple thing to simply add "Valve" to a search warrant issued for another purpose, such as some kind of credit card fraud involving the use of computers

    It occurs to me that this person might have had data belonging to other people on his machines prior to seizure, and that the "Valve" story is simply that--a story contrived, with the aid of Photoshop or something like it, to explain to his friends why their data, if not some of their computers, have been seized by the authorities.

    Gosh, sometimes it's just so hard to think, and my head hurts...:) But it also occurs to me that possibly, just possibly, it might not always be a good idea to believe everything one sees printed on the Internet. Yea, right--what could I possibly know?...:)

  71. In austin... by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Informative

    they've developed a mobile data forensics lab where technicians download your harddrives, copy your CDs and everything else to their own systems and then return the equipment to you. The process takes time, obviously, but the van is loaded with equipment.

    news story about it

    --

    -

  72. Well... by HiggsBison · · Score: 2, Funny
    Haven't you seen Hackers? The Secret Service does everything!

    Well... all I've got to say is that they shouldn't have left Half-Life 2 Source lying around on the Gibson. I mean, that was just asking for trouble, wasn't it?

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  73. Re:Talk about drugs, lose your PC? by enjo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have some experience in this. The answer is that the 'talk of drugs' has to be evidence of drug posession or trafficking. The general rule, if they find something on your machine that could be used as material (key word) evidence in court they can keep the machine for as long as there is a case in which it could be used (otherwise they have 180 days I beleive).

    Contrary to what most of the ill-informed Slashdotters are posting here, there are a variety of property rights that you have in cases like these. While I've never had machines siezed, I have two very good friends that are District Attorneys. I've worked with them as technical consult on a few computer crime cases. In 3 of the 5 cases (2 of which involved the feds) the machines where back in their owners hands in less than 4 weeks. These where all pretty clear cut cases that involved those machines being hacked and used for illegal purposes.

    One thing to note, the warrants generally apply to searches involving very specific goals. They actually can't wantonly search every file on your computer (in theory anyways) looking to turn up evidence of some other crime. This is actually a pretty entertaining legal fight...

    For those keeping score, the other 2 cases where clear (and I mean CRYSTAL clear) violations of law. 1 resulted in a plea bargain, and the other is awaiting trial. So from MY experience (take it for what it's worth), the experience is not nearly as draconian as your seeing here. While it does suck to have your equipment taken (i'm assuming), these people really don't want to sit on it for years. They want to do there job, gather evidence, and move on with life.

    ***beginning rant****
    As with most things, the government is neither as onerous or interested in you as popular culture wants us to beleive. it's really a far to disparate collection of little agencies to effectively do that. It CAN really screw people, but for the most part people really do get treated fairly. My perception of government has really changed as I've become more and more involved with various portions of it. But I guess fear mongering is really more entertaining at the end of the day. *sighs*
    ****/end rant*****

    --
    Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!