Slashdot Mirror


Pop Up Ads in Space

modder writes "A Russian inventor has patented ads in space. Shouldn't this violate some sort of International Space Law?" Remember the first time your dad took you out at 1am into the backyard with a telescope? With Your kids the conversation will be something like "Follow the Swoosh to Arcturus, Drive a Spike to the AT&T Logo"

393 comments

  1. radio by heliocentric · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does this mean that the radio show is back in action?

    --
    Wheeeee
    1. Re:radio by rs25com · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh I really hope they don't actually start advertising in space.

      That's just HORRIBLE. 'Nuff said.

    2. Re:radio by DjMd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?
      Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines...and movies...and at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts and written in the sky. But not in dreams. No siree!

      Whoa. Deja vu.

      --
      DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
    3. Re:radio by fuzzix · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's just HORRIBLE. 'Nuff said.


      As Bill Hicks put it:
      "By the way, if anyone here is in marketing or advertising, Kill Yourself. Just planting seeds, that's all I'm doing. No joke here. Really, Seriously, Kill Yourself. There is no rationalization for what you do. You are Satan's little helpers. Kill Yourself, Kill Yourself, Kill Yourself Now. I know some of you are thinking there's going to be a joke coming up...There's no fucking joke. Suck a tailpipe, hang yourself, borrow a pistol from an NRA buddy - do something to rid the world of your evil fucking presence. Okay, back to the show..."

      I don't think any more needs to be said on this :)
    4. Re:radio by GTRacer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Now THAT is just plain creepy...I'm listening to a playlist of over 60 Futurama and South Park mp3s, and that line was playing about 10 seconds before I read your post.

      Time to buy a lotto ticket!

      GTRacer
      - MomCorp

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    5. Re:radio by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I think something needs to be said about this. Every time a story like this pops up, there's always someone who posts this, and there's always tons of people who lump every marketing moron who comes up with one of these stupid ideas with everybody else in marketing.

      NOT EVERYBODY IN MARKETING/ADVERTISING IS DUMB/UNETHICAL/EVIL!

      Just like any other industry, there are sleazebags and scum. There are PLENTY of people in marketing/advertising that respect the people they target, and try to actually do a good job and have a system of ethics they go by. If I ever had a client ask about "advertising in space" I would tell him flat out that it is the quickest way to alienate a large number of people and that the sales he MIGHT get from it would in no way be worth the bad PR.

      Seriously, its fine if you want to call 'em as you see 'em, but for the love of god stop assuming all marketing/advertising people are the devil. For example, I'm in the industry, I'm a huge geek, I'm a gamer, I'm a huge privacy advocate, etc.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Either that or you're about to be killed by a meteor.

    7. Re:radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't the very point of marketing to get people to buy the product, whether they want it or not? How can that possibly be ethical?

    8. Re:radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kinda would like to see this. I have always wanted to see that cow from chic-fil-a with a sign that says, "Eat mor chiken" anywhere they could put it.




      ...What? Stop staring at me!

    9. Re:radio by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Nope. According to Google the definition is:

      "Marketing - The process of planning and executing the conception, pricing, promotion, and distribution of goods, services, and ideas to create exchanges that satisfy individual and organisation objectives."

      Shows how wrong assumptions can be.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    10. Re:radio by fuzzix · · Score: 1
      Nope. According to Google the definition is:

      "Marketing - The process of planning and executing the conception, pricing, promotion, and distribution of goods, services, and ideas to create exchanges that satisfy individual and organisation objectives."

      Shows how wrong assumptions can be.


      That definition sounds a lot like "marketing speak" - as if marketeers defined themselves to paint a positive image. Now, that's not their style, is it?
      The fact is most marketing will create the desire or perceived need for the product and once this has been achieved the company moves in to fulfil requirements.
      I'm finding it hard to think of examples that contradict this - all that springs to mind is toy commercials, coca-cola shorts, Microsoft ads, all of which (from my perspective) try to convince me something is missing from my life - that I will never acieve my objectives and be fulfilled if I don't buy these products.
      My own definition of marketing, which is a part of my overall bullshit filter, is "To create a false desire and then feed it with the end result of benefitting the supplier rather than the consumer"
    11. Re:radio by Marvelicious · · Score: 1

      Since you are such a huge "privacy advocate" I assume that the only form of advertising you take part in is placing yellow pages ads and setting up websites. I consider any unsolicited info about a product an invasion. No exceptions. TV ads, radio ads, magazine ads; all right up there with spam and telemarketers.

      I suppose I might object less to advertising that speaks above the lowest common denominator, but I have yet to see that!

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    12. Re:radio by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Alright, now you're just being unreasonable.

      "That definition sounds a lot like "marketing speak" - as if marketeers defined themselves to paint a positive image. Now, that's not their style, is it? The fact is most marketing will create the desire or perceived need for the product and once this has been achieved the company moves in to fulfil requirements."

      I would tell you that every industry has its jargon, anybody in a technical field should know this. However, there is really no "marketing speak" in that definition. Its pretty basic english so I fail to see the problem you're having with it. There is no painting a positive image in that definition. Its a definition, it is neutral. However, your statement was not neutral. "I'm finding it hard to think of examples that contradict this - all that springs to mind is toy commercials, coca-cola shorts, Microsoft ads, all of which (from my perspective) try to convince me something is missing from my life - that I will never acieve my objectives and be fulfilled if I don't buy these products."

      Some advertising does this, however you really need to realize that marketing is a much bigger concept than you seem to think it is. And just because certain companies advertise in certain ways you don't approve of doesn't make marketing "evil".

      "My own definition of marketing, which is a part of my overall bullshit filter, is "To create a false desire and then feed it with the end result of benefitting the supplier rather than the consumer"

      And this is why I knew it was pointless to give you the real definition. You already have your own, and you seem to refuse to accept that there is a REAL definition of it, and it happens to conflict with your perceived image that all marketing is unethical. Having a bullshit filter is fine. It is necessary to sift through the messages that some unethical companies may try to send you. However you would be wrong to think that marketing itself exists to try to sell you things you don't need. If that is what you think it does, fine, I really could care less at this point. You seem incapable of being reasoned with even when presented with a cold hard definition, which you inflated to be something it wasn't in a most trollish fashion. Enjoy your paranoid life.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:radio by bendude · · Score: 1

      TV, Radio and Magazine ads are not unsolicited.

      How do you think these industries make money?

      They offer you an information stream and include a mix of programming to appeal to a wide audience along with paid advertisments.

      No one is forcing you to partake.

      I suppose I might object less if I didn't think you were the type to burn copies of all your friends CDs too.

      What is it with you people and your "I want it and I'm not paying for it attitude"?

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
    14. Re:radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like ol' Bill struck a nerve in you. Let me rephrase: EVERYBODY IN MARKETING/ADVERTISING IS DUMB/UNETHICAL/EVIL!

      Cheers!

    15. Re:radio by fuzzix · · Score: 1
      Enjoy your paranoid life.

      Fine, I will then. You just see if I don't.
      Heheh, that showed 'im. ;)
    16. Re:radio by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      NOT EVERYBODY IN MARKETING/ADVERTISING IS DUMB/UNETHICAL/EVIL!

      He himself may not be. But, he still is a Satan's little helper. I don't think that you can deny with a straight face that advertising is an industry which is solely focused on finding ways of deceiving people into buying stuff.

    17. Re:radio by Marvelicious · · Score: 1

      No sorry, no cd copies. All $10,000 (a guestimate based on $15 apiece) worth paid for with real hard earned dollars.

      The problem is, the ad industry still expects me to pay for this crap. Five bucks for a magazine 1/3 content and 2/3 advertising. Fifty bucks or more for ad crammed reality TV (yeah, I shut off my cable. Not worth it). Radio is still free, oh wait, they want to sell me satelite radio now. I'm happy to pay for something, I just expect something worth paying for. No, I'm not some teenage fanboy who is pissed that he actually has to pay for his next video game, I make and spend an awful lot of money.

      Listen up adboy! Here I am. The consumer. Your industry is FUCKED! You drive me away from the entertainment industry by polluting it with your drivel. Oh well, I can spend my money at the bar instead. At least I get what I pay for there!

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
  2. When will it stop? by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Wait for the first "Want your willie to be THIS BIG??" spam stretching for hundreds of kilometers across the horizon.

    Jokes aside, why do people put up with intrusive advertising as a given? How much of your money spent on a 1 litre soft drink goes directly towards advertising the product back to you? I read some time ago that "big 3" North American automakers spend approximately US$1500 (averaged) on advertising for each vehicle sold.

    Ultimately you foot the bill & suffer with the barrage of adverts, they reap the sales & expense write offs.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:When will it stop? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of those "advertising" dollars are spent sponsoring things like sporting events, theatre, live concerts, etc..

      Almost every major venue has a corporate sponsor these days. Staples Arena, 1st Mariner Arena, Air Canada Center, Ford Center for the Performing Arts, etc.. Because, by themselves, these arena's arent profitable.

      Noone could afford to race Nascar if not for those company decals plastered all over the cars.

      So the big corporations write it off as marketing dollars, we get our big stadiums and events.. They also pay for our free-to-air TV and radio (which is a relatively small amount of their advertising budgets).

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:When will it stop? by isorox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fine, start a company that doesn't advertise. You'll be able to sell your product much cheaper.

    3. Re:When will it stop? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      Jokes aside, why do people put up with intrusive advertising as a given? How much of your money spent on a 1 litre soft drink goes directly towards advertising the product back to you? I read some time ago that "big 3" North American automakers spend approximately US$1500 (averaged) on advertising for each vehicle sold.

      Very interesting. I've oft wondered how much of a pair of tennis shoes, a soda, a car, or common foodstuffs (chips, Big Macs, etc.) were amortized advertising costs. I suspect I'd be scared at the answer.
      But to answer your question, how the #$%! do we avoid it and not end up in a mountain cabin being a recluse?

    4. Re:When will it stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ultimately you foot the bill & suffer with the barrage of adverts, they reap the sales & expense write offs.

      Flawed argument. Sure you pay part of the advertising for any product you buy, but the advertising was necessary for you to buy a particular product in the first place.

      Now this brings an interesting line of idea, if more directed advertisment were available, targetting people more susceptible to buy a particular product then to total cost of advertising could be reduced and the benefits given to you.

      On the other hand, _suppose_ we limit the advertising to be made and instead rely on consumer group reports for information. Then it can probably be said that the criteria for evaluating a product (impartial or not) are not necessary the criteria for a particular customer to buy the product. Therefore the information useful to _you_ to buy a particular report is not present in those reports but a company still wants you to buy their product.

    5. Re:When will it stop? by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny
      how the #$%! do we avoid it and not end up in a mountain cabin being a recluse?

      With this story's new development, being a mountain cabin recluse still isn't enough. You've gotta live in a cave.

    6. Re:When will it stop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Three arc-seconds?

      Depends on how warped...

      Nevermind.

    7. Re:When will it stop? by enosys · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And why should I be forced to pay for stuff I don't want? I don't care about free-to-air TV and most radio, I don't care about Nascar, and I don't care about most professional sports. It's almost like a tax, except it's imposed by corporations and not the government.

    8. Re:When will it stop? by Dudio · · Score: 1

      Actually, TV advertising is a huge part of the typical Fortune 500 advertising budget. Putting your name on a stadium costs a couple million dollars a year. Putting 30-second commercials on prime-time network television throughout the year can cost in the hundreds of millions.

      However, you're right that advertising is the reason broadcast media remain free (as in beer) and football tickets aren't twice as expensive. That doesn't mean we don't don't pay for them though - the cost is just hidden in the form of higher retail prices for brand name merchandise.

    9. Re:When will it stop? by Xawen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With the notable exception that you can opt-out of this so called "tax" by simply not purchasing the product. I'd like to see you try that with a real tax. The advertising, the events, and the additional cost are more like by-products. As with anything else, if you are opposed to the by-product, you cease use of whatever creates it.

    10. Re:When will it stop? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Funny

      And Osama gets the last laugh after all...

    11. Re:When will it stop? by ThosLives · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is the same difficult issue as "Why should I pay taxes? Why should I pay insurance when I've never needed to use it? Why should I pay an 'activity fee' at my university when I don't use most of the activities for which it goes?"

      It's kind of a collective effect thing, where some would argue that everyone paying a little bit benefits society as a whole even if there are some individuals who don't "get" anything for their expense. It's more an argument, I think, of selfish versus collective thinking. Granted, this is decidedly UnAmerican(TM).

      That said, of course, the idea of ads in space (where I have no choice to not see them!) or "McDonald's on the moon" makes me want to vomit.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    12. Re:When will it stop? by tassii · · Score: 1

      With this story's new development, being a mountain cabin recluse still isn't enough. You've gotta live in a cave.

      Yeah, but you have to share it with Bin Laden and you know how safe THAT is.

      --
      "I drank what?" - Socrates
    13. Re:When will it stop? by enosys · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You can't always opt-out of advertising. There may be good reasons why you want to buy a particular product and not a competing one. In some cases you can't even find an unadvertised competing product.

      Of course you can opt-out by not buying but that's not really a solution if you want it, and BTW you can "opt-out" of sales tax the same way (by not buying stuff).

    14. Re:When will it stop? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Right, and you'll surely sell a whole lot of them. Unfortunately, my experience with consumer products is that it takes a combination of word-of-mouth endorsement and advertising to get a product in front of people. And some products, by their nature, are more likely to benefit from pure word-of-mouth. Nonetheless, the fact is that people don't buy stuff they don't know about and that will continue to drive the market for new and creative ways to advertise products.


      That being said, I think these kinds of terribly intrusive public ads are so clearly not a public good that they should be banned outright. It pretty much goes without saying that putting an ad in space is like turning the Grand Canyon into a massive ad, only about a million times worse. Communities should be able to set standards about things like public billboards. In the same way that a community doesn't want their public parks and nature reserves crapped up with ads, none of us want space crapped up with ads.

    15. Re:When will it stop? by nolife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Noone could afford to race Nascar if not for those company decals plastered all over the cars.

      I love auto racing and I love watching auto racing but I am not into circle driving and not a fan or follower of Nascar at all so my below opinion may not matter to you.
      You are right, Nascar would not be where it is today without mega advertising dollars but you would still be able to visit a local dirt track / closed road race / motocross and see very good competition and good racing. You may not know the names but the side by side racing is exactly the same intensity but normally at lower relative speeds then Nascar and the local racing seems less predictable which adds fun also. Same agrument with the RIAA vs. independent musicians performing locally.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    16. Re:When will it stop? by welshwaterloo · · Score: 1

      nuh-uh. I think Plato already patented that area..

    17. Re:When will it stop? by LordKaT · · Score: 1
      Ultimately you foot the bill & suffer with the barrage of adverts, they reap the sales & expense write offs.

      No-fucking-duh. You also fit the bill for more R&D, paid vacations, marketing, T1 lines, multiple phone lines, desktop computers, upgrades to a server, an electric bill (or two), some hapless janitor named roger wilco, and a retarded monkey being used for scientific experiments on the effects of caffine on a monkeys ass.

      But, your $1.25 only fits part of that bill. Let's not forget that most retail outlets will jack up their cost from distribution a good 20% or so. And a lot of that money has to be sent on keeping up the distribution warehouse, getting raw materials, paying employees, etc ...

      ...

      What was your point again?

      Oh, that's right: you didn't have any because you're a slashdot tool.

      --LordKaT

    18. Re:When will it stop? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      There's no reason why many arenas and sports couldn't exist without ads and sponsors. They would just have to rely on either private donations, higher admission fees, or the amount of money going into sport/theatre would go down.

      One thing I find odd is that I can go and see small bands play in 1000 person clubs and pay say 14 a ticket, but some mega band playing to 60,000 people charge 30 a ticket AND have their tour sponsored. I don't believe they couldn't go without sponsorship (in fact U2 do go without it).

    19. Re:When will it stop? by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      You can't always opt-out of advertising.

      True, but I think there's more than what you say. The truth is, we can't avoid advertising. How many billboards do you see when you drive? How many radio ads do you hear when you're at a restaurant? How many clothing ads do you see when you walk through the mall?

      The truth is, advertising is almost impossible to avoid. You can opt out of paying for it, but you can't opt out of seeing it.

    20. Re:When will it stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG!!~``` MONKEYS A55!!!! UR teh funeeeeeee!!!

    21. Re:When will it stop? by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure your comment was meant sarcastically, but haven't you ever heard of generic versions? Go to a supermarket, any supermarket, but especially one that's not in the wealthiest part of town. Find a brand-name product like Oreos or Fruit Loops or Tylenol or anything else lots of people know about and purchase. How many alternative versions are on the shelf, for a little bit cheaper? You probably don't recognize the names of any of those other manufacturers. Yet the stuff sells fine.

    22. Re:When will it stop? by DoorFrame · · Score: 2, Informative

      I love my No-Ad suntan lotion. It's cheaper, you get a huge bottle, it doesn't smell weird, and it works great.

      "Since 1960, NO-AD, as in "not advertised," has succeeded in providing high quality suncare products at a fraction of the cost of other advertised brands. Rather than promoting the NO-AD line of products through expensive advertising campaigns or glitzy beauty pageants, we'd rather pass the savings directly onto you, our valued customer. This is what we call ~ "the NO-AD concept" -from their site

    23. Re:When will it stop? by TheCatWhisperer · · Score: 1

      Yes, however, the companies that finance those nascars use the cars to prove technology. Many a better drive-trane, etc has been developed initially for auto-racing or other such events. This is not like an earlier discussion on why the military funds research. The military may use the research for some 'evil' but without them footing the bill, many of the research that may ulimatly lead to a breakthrough civilian use could never be afforded.

      Ofcourse, I'de love to see that idea put on a hydrogen powered NASCAR. Yeah...

    24. Re:When will it stop? by wash23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everything is advertised. Opting out isn't feasible, unless we collectively decide to go Kaczinski (Unabomber). No thanks. But it would be nice if we'd mostly agree to refuse to let people advertise on every available surface, or at least draw the line at the night sky!

    25. Re:When will it stop? by thogard · · Score: 1

      Advertising isn't about selling cars, its about selling the ads. Ad compaines are very good at selling their product (the ad) and the ads effectivness is inmaterial. When the web came around it was the 1st time where advertisers could guage how effective their ads were and get instant feed back. Most found out their ads were less than .001% as effective as the advertising companines claimed (and backed by Nelson or whoever). Their result wasn't to abandon the ads but to give up on any medium that allowed for instant stat verification.

      But your right, we all get to pay for the ads even if they don't work.

    26. Re:When will it stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's say Coke, or Pepsi, suddenly stopped advertising. Coke spends ~2 billion dollars a year on advertising. Their total revenue was $21 billion. Even on the generous asssumption that all of that revenue was from sales of soda, that means that their soda could be ~10% cheaper and they'd make just as much profit.

      If Coke was 89c and Pepsi 99c at the supermarket, which would most people buy? People who like Coke would buy Coke. People who like Pepsi would buy Pepsi.

      And people who don't care would buy Coke.

      Once a brand is established, if their product isn't changing, advertising makes less and less sense.

    27. Re:When will it stop? by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem isn't so much the ads, it's the intrusiveness of advertisers.

      For example, ads in malls are fine by me. The mall is a place specifically built for commerce, so it's to be expected. The Radio provides programming in return for the listener accepting ads. For me, it's not a worthwhile trade, so I don't bother with the radio.

      Billboards should be restricted to developed commercial/industrial zones. Billboards along a highway shouldn't be.

      As a side note, I do not buy clothes with big logos and designer names on them. I prefer unmarked clothes, but will accept those with an easily removed lable.

      Telephone solicitation and spam are right out. The national do-not-call list was IMHO an excellent step in the right direction, I just wish it had happened 10 years ago.

    28. Re:When will it stop? by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've just been through my kitchen. There is not one advertised food item in it. Not one.

      With the exception of my Sharp Microwave (acquired used) none of its major fittings are advertised either. I have some Calphalon, bought at discount, and some Pyrex(tm).

      Ok, looking through my clothes closet, my shoes are advertised, but I decided to buy them in the store previously unaware that the brand existed. They looked nice. They felt good. They were on sale.

      My furniture. All used/antique, or handmade. No Ikea, Sullivan or other modern advertised crap products.

      My TV's a Sony. Heavily advertised. Didn't affect my purchase much though. It was a nice TV. On sale.

      All of my computer gear was selected by word of mouth recommendations, with the single exception of my Cambridge Soundworks speakers. I bought those strictly on the reputation of the maker. I've had a pair of Kloss's AR-4 speakers for God knows how long. Love 'em. Bought his new stuff. Love it. I did have to pay an advertising "tax" on some of it though, since decent computer gear is still pretty much all patented nongeneric stuff. I tend to buy behind the cycle at closeout prices though, often at well below manufacturers original cost of production.

      Oh yeah. I run Linux.

      Commercial computer games I don't buy until someone I trust tells me it's worth the price, and even then usually wait until it gets down to the twenty buck rack.

      I have found exactly two items in my house that are not only advertised, but where that advertising had any affect on my purchasing. The first is my Serengeti Drivers sunglasses. It was highly targeted advertising, by a local manufacturer (Corning Glass) and my Coulter Optical 10" Newtonian primary was selected entirely on the basis of advertising, also, and obviously, a highly targeted bit of advertising. Not exactly your typical consumer good.

      One the whole it's perfectly easy to buy unadvertised goods where those goods are generic, like lentils, peas, pants and furnishings (or simply produce your own), and to purchase those goods which are, by necessity advertised (CPUs) at below cost and avoid the advertising "tax." Maybe it helps if you were raised a Scot or a Yankee.

      In the latter case, I have to admit, I'm letting other people pay the tax for me.

      Thanks guys. 'preciate it.

      KFG

    29. Re:When will it stop? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Noone could afford to race Nascar if not for those company decals plastered all over the cars.

      Big loss. There will always be entertainment. Even if it's just a city softball league, local/regional bands (many of them are better than you'd think), or a chess club. We don't need corporations in order to have fun.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    30. Re:When will it stop? by HFKIRSpyderMonkey · · Score: 1

      Of course, when looking through a telescope, the penis enlargement ads will be huddled around Uranus.

      (Mod this stupid, but someone had to use an obligatory Uranus joke)

    31. Re:When will it stop? by JesseL · · Score: 1

      If you wan't to talk about race technology being applied to production cars NASCAR is the worst place I can think to start.

      Last time I looked, the level of technology applied to NASCAR was revolutionary 60 years ago. They are forced to use carburetors, non-independant live axle rear suspension, minimal aerodynamic devices, pushrod valve actuation, etc.

      The actual production cars that they are supposed to look like (but have no actual relation to) are more technologicaly advanced in nearly every way.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    32. Re:When will it stop? by MrScience · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Enron Field!

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    33. Re:When will it stop? by robertjw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is the mail specifically built for commerce??? I believe the mail was specifically built for communication, much like the Internet is now. I don't expect advertising in my mail any more than I expect it on my phone or email.

      I'm thinking Ben Franklin didn't send a lot of boxholders or mail marked occupant when he started the USPS way back when.

      Billboards on the other hand, in many parts of the country, break up incredibly BORING scenery (I-80 through Nebraska, South Dakota, Wyoming, etc...). I think they could be restricted to so many per mile with no billboards in areas designated as scenic.

    34. Re:When will it stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cambridge Soundworks speakers

      I hope those are doing good for you, but I couldn't live without my THX certified Klipsch speakers. I guess I'm quite sucker for marketing, cause that little THX logo, plus rave reviews, sold me on them. ;) Commercial computer games I don't buy until someone I trust tells me it's worth the price, and even then usually wait until it gets down to the twenty buck rack.

      I hear you there... and it helps that it only takes about 6 months to a year for the game to hit the bargin bin. There's always ebay, too, the great Internet bargin bin of old games. And let's not forget emulation. It sure is nice that some dedicated people donated countless hours of programming so that I could play my old games for free. Awww... ain't open source grand?

    35. Re:When will it stop? by kfg · · Score: 1

      At the time the Klipsch speakers were not yet available. In fact the particular set I have no longer appears to be available. They're the original high quality, music oriented speakers. Guess there wasn't much of a market.

      If I were in the market for surround sound for games/movies, yeah, I'd give a serious look/listen to the Klipsch THX certified stuff.

      I happen to like stereo, and don't particularly care about effects bass. Call me an old fuddy duddy.

      KFG

    36. Re:When will it stop? by DrFrasierCrane · · Score: 1

      Not "mail": read it again, it says "mall"

      --
      You call this a signature?
    37. Re:When will it stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.emagazine.com/may-june_1996/0596feat2.h tml

      In fact, it's now possible to sponsor an entire American city. In 1993, the city of Atlanta hired Joel Babbit, a former advertising executive, to help the city sell itself. Babbitt came up with a plan to rename streets and parks for corporate sponsors, implant ads in city sidewalks, and plaster corporate logos on the sides of city garbage trucks. To reassure those naysayers who thought he might be going too far, Babbitt announced that not just any corporate sponsor would be welcome--he would draw the line at firearms and sexual products. This was a great relief to those who envisioned products like "the official assault rifle of Atlanta" or condoms imprinted with the city seal.

    38. Re:When will it stop? by Skidge · · Score: 1

      Before the Enron inplosion, the back cover of the Houston Astros media guide from Enron Field was an ad for Enron with the caption: "Sometimes, it's the things you don't see that have the biggest impact."

    39. Re:When will it stop? by Volmarias · · Score: 1

      Mall. Mall! MALL! He said MALL , not MAIL !

      Further, one could argue that the mail IS built for commerce. Consider just one example; every month you (or someone actinging in your interest) pays bills for various services. Heating, electric, telephone, etc. Rather than driving down to each particular building and dropping off a check, you pass that off to the gents with the eagle on their caps, who do it for a very modest fee.

    40. Re:When will it stop? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I feel kinda dumb. Guess I should read more carefully,

      As for the rest of your comments. The same thing could be argued for the telephone, or the Internet. I pay more bills over the net than mail these days.

    41. Re:When will it stop? by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      >here some would argue that everyone paying a little bit benefits society as a whole

      As I see it, the problem tends to be that "society as a whole" usually refers to "a few persistent people who complain much more loudly than others."

      The activity fee at your university is a perfect example. Nobody really cares enough to follow the money, but as soon as that funding were cut, you could bet the University Tiddly Winks Cadets would be knocking down the administration's doors demanding money.

      The issue is not whether one person is being selfish, but rather who gets to decide which groups benefit and which groups don't. I think that's a decision best left to individuals. ALL individuals.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    42. Re:When will it stop? by WorkEmail · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember a story similar to this, and I may have even read it here on /. but I am not sure. About Butterflies wings being colored to look like company logos. Genetics breakthroughs are being used to do productive things at least. Can you imagine going to the zoo and seeing a huge grizly bear that has red fur and a coca cola logo on the side of it?

    43. Re:When will it stop? by edp · · Score: 1
      "Fine, start a company that doesn't advertise. You'll be able to sell your product much cheaper."

      If I recall correctly, Hershey's did no consumer advertising for their first 70 years. While you do need to get your name out there, you do not need to shove it in people's faces.

    44. Re:When will it stop? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Well, it's been patented, so it's stopped for about 20 years.

    45. Re:When will it stop? by funwithstuff · · Score: 1

      There's a really, really nice way to avoid visual advertising temporarily. Visit a foreign country. If you can't read them, the ads just don't get into your headspace.

      For TV ad-free, you could move to the UK. For all the bitching about the license fee, the BBC does provide the world's last great multi-channel ad-free TV. If the BBC gets sold off, the world will be worse off for it.

      --
      it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
    46. Re:When will it stop? by scifiber_phil · · Score: 1

      I don't use the corporate product of pro sports, but here in Pennsylvania, I get to help pay for it (the statiums) with my tax dollars whether I want to or not. Philadelphia and Pittsburgh both are getting new statiums thanks to myself and other Pa. taxpayers. I'll never watch or go to any games. I just get to pay for the statiums. Not to be left out, many smaller Pa. cities want their piece of the pie. (Lancaster county is getting some state funds to pay for a new Baseball park. The state funds are not enough, of course, so the county floats a bond for more money. Lancaster county residents get to pay for the state funds, and for the county bonds, and guess what? The state has raised the percentage of the income tax. There is a budget shortfall. All this for something I will never use. P.S. do not bother with the sport teams create jobs thing. With this amount of money, any person with normal intelligence should be able to come up with several plans to create several times the jobs that all of these statiums combined provide.

    47. Re:When will it stop? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


      It's bad enough we have to put up with power lines and tall skyscrapers obscuring our view of the beautiful skies. The dude beaming ads in the sky should be kicked right in the ass and hard. If this technology becomes deployed, consumers should boycott anybody who advertises on it. This is slimy and right up there with ripping off old ladies.

    48. Re:When will it stop? by kabloom · · Score: 1

      This is why we need a value system that runs deeper then "y'all go out and buy something"

    49. Re:When will it stop? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Normally, I would tolerate bill board sign along highway. I will tolerate almost every form of advertisement EXCEPT for spam (mail, e-mail, telemarketing). I don't mine some ads on webpage (hey, they need money to keep it going), but no pop-ups. I think the one that did this best is Google's text ad. Not intrusive, not an eye-sore, it actually look kind of nice they way they design it.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    50. Re:When will it stop? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      How does BBC get funded then? Are they like PBS, supported by public (and large corporation), who only get a thank and a short 10 seconds commercial every hour?

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    51. Re:When will it stop? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      No, but corporation could give us more choice for some HUGE entertainment event (granted, I don't like those kind of event, no NASCAR for me). But just to make a point, some people ACTUALLY enjoy watching fast car going in circles, why is it fun is beyond me. On a side note, I do like watching some extreme sports (skate boarding for example) that sometimes have a corporate sponsor.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    52. Re:When will it stop? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Hm... Google seems to do MUCH better then Yahoo with no TV ads (who here can remember the "Do you Yahoo?" TV ads? Uh huh... Who remember any Google TV ads?)

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    53. Re:When will it stop? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Too bad you posted as anonymous, I might've modded as Interesting. It is hard to see Anony Cowards who posted somewhat intelligently. By the way, maybe funny is a better mod for it... sponsoring an entire American city... the question is not When will it stop, but How FAR will it go (ad in human genome?)?

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    54. Re:When will it stop? by funwithstuff · · Score: 1

      The BBC is funded by the TV license fee, a compulsory payment if you possess TV receiving equipment in the UK. A lot of people don't like it, but to me the alternative (a neutered BBC) is far worse.

      --
      it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
    55. Re:When will it stop? by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1
      By the licence fee [BBC.co.uk], which is about 100 every year.

      I used to really object to paying it, but then I went to New York and saw the quality of the TV there, and I'm now very happy to support the BBC, if only for their excellent news services.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  3. I may be missing the legal point. by GMontag · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Shouldn't this violate some sort of International Space Law?

    Not that I can see, but the search feature was broken when I looked. I did browse around and find this:


    The treaties control space-related activities of States. What about non-governmental entities active in outer space, like companies and even individuals?


    The Outer Space Treaty states that States Parties shall bear international responsibility for national activities in outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, whether such activities are carried out by governmental agencies or non-governmental entities, and for assuring that national activities are carried out in conformity with the provisions set forth in the treaty. The Treaty further states that the activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party.

    Seems to refute the assertion, until other information can be found.

    Even if it were some sort of violation of International Space Law, why would a patent violate that? Describing and protecting a method should not be a violation of a law, actually doing it should be a violation of the law.

    Note: the views of some storm-troopers may differ from mine :)
    1. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by PMuse · · Score: 4, Informative

      Shouldn't this violate some sort of International Space Law?

      Whether launching one would violate any law or not, the existence of this patent is a good thing. Why, you ask? Because the patent (1) allows him to prevent other people from launching one and (2) doesn't give him any license to launch one himself.

      Patents are a right to exclude others, not a right for you to practice.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    2. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't sign any treaty- so they can hire me to spam space.

    3. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think the relevant law (for the US) is 35 USC 105 "Inventions in Outer Space.

      Basically, whether or not the invention was thought of or will be used in space, it is still a jurisdiction question. I know about patents, but space jurisdiction - not so much.

      If you have the ability to do something in space, just make sure you are doing it under the banner of a country that isn't too concerned with US patents :)

    4. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party.

      So, it seems that the gov't owns the whole universe now. How quaint.

      --Authorization, can't leave home without it.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Well, at least there is no prior art, if they don't count the ads made on Mir.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by JawFunk · · Score: 1
      Describing and protecting a method should not be a violation of a law, actually doing it should be a violation of the law.

      Good point. Recipe for a bomb is a patent somehwere, but applying that recipe out of context (as in me playing withC4 and wiring in my living room) is against most laws...except Obama!!

      --
      [Please sign here]
    7. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. And his patent wouldn't hold up. The idea has been had before.

      His invention, as he calls it, is to have a bunch of sattelites with reflectors spelling out something by flying in formation. Aside from the insane amount of money such an endevour would cost for the truly minimal return... (Why not just buy a bunch of soccer teams and rename them after your most popular product lines) there is the less than enthusiastic reception from your customers who aren't in the habbit of leaving the comfort of their living room to go stare aimlessly at the sky at night anyway. Unless you can make a lot of money from pissing off astronomers, or selling yurts to mongolian sheppards, this is not a viable business plan.

      File this story under stupid people get publicity too. I could have been done, it's already been thought of, and yet it hasn't been done. Something it pointing to other forces at work.

    8. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      But with no space laws there is nothing stopping you from making a rocket to destroy those adds.

      In the middle of the night you see a flash of light. then you hear "Daddy are we about to have a thunder storm" "No that is just an other advertisement that we blew up.

      Heck it is a great way to lower our nuclear stock pile.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This brings up an interesting question -- can you get a patent for a device/process that's clearly illegal under federal law?

      For example, say someone applied for a patent on a method for manufacturing crack cocaine. Does submitting the application constitute a violation of the law in and of itself, or would the application simply be denied? Or, would it be granted? If it was granted, could the patent holder sue drug dealers for patent infringement?

      Obviously, I don't advise trying this, because no matter what else happens, some DEA agents would surely "invite" themselves over to your house for a visit if you did... I'm just wondering how the patent office would handle this.

    10. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he can sue the people that put up all the NASA and Ariadne advertisements (AKA space garbage) that orbit earth at extremely dangerous speeds :).

    11. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      That and the amount of satellite needed to even make an ad big enough. Each satellite, even at their height of luminosity (when their body reflects the most light), is just a frigging tiny dot (even the space station). Now, imagine the size of the satellite trying to do a frigging ad.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    12. Re:I may be missing the legal point. by radja · · Score: 1

      actually... that's governments, not a single government or the government.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  4. No, I don't think so... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Funny

    To paraphrase Lois Lane, I will *personally* lead the army that wipes space ads out of the sky.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:No, I don't think so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now those X-Prize geeks have a purpose.

    2. Re:No, I don't think so... by mcharlet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I agree with you in principle (anyone selling anti-satellite rockets, perchance?) I'd just suggest this: When the first company to take 'advantage' of this advertising strategy announces that they will do so, write them a very polite letter telling them that you will boycott every product they ever produce from now until the cold bitter end if they actually proceed. Tell them that you will then spend sizeable effort convincing friends, neighbours, your children's schoolmates, etc... to forever blacklist that company. Tell them that websites, protests, bad press and tv spots of little children looking up at the sky and saying "Why is pizza hut making it hard to use my christmas present telescope, daddy?" will be forthcoming. Granted, it'll probably take someone to actually do it, and then see massive loss in business before other companies really take notice.

    3. Re:No, I don't think so... by TurboDog99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you on this one. If a company were to go ahead with polluting the sky with this garbage, I don't think they could ever do enough to convince me to buy from them again. At least with banner ads and TV ads, we're getting a service in exchange for viewing the ads, and we can opt-out by not going to those Internet sites or TV channels.

    4. Re:No, I don't think so... by MotherInferior · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase J'onn J'onzz:

      Why do you think I left Mars?
    5. Re:No, I don't think so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      little children looking up at the sky and saying "Why is pizza hut making it hard to use my christmas present telescope, daddy?" will be forthcoming.

      Not to mention the hordes of scientists that will also scream and bitch and moan about the lightpollution, which is already horrible.
      Advertising would just make it so much worse...

    6. Re:No, I don't think so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be right there with you. Even the idea of this makes me angry.

    7. Re:No, I don't think so... by cygnus · · Score: 1

      i was thinking the same thing.. can i be your lieutenant? i figure we'll have to move to a country with no extradition or mutual enforcement treaties with whatever country is allowing people to deface the sky and mount our attack from there. space ad people, i will be your Max Zorin!!!!

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    8. Re:No, I don't think so... by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      I thought the best idea I had was to go buy their competitors product, and then mail in copies of your cheque (made to the competitor), or invoices for competitors products etc (anything that shows evidence of YOUR money going to THEIR competitor!)

    9. Re:No, I don't think so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Somehow I think assassinations of corporate management would work better. Can't spend your millions of dollars in bonuses if you're dead.

  5. Prior Art by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think Pizza Hut has some prior art from 1999 on this one unless that Russian was behind the deal.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Prior Art by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a very different device being claimed here, one that can project light down to earth, not just painting something on a rocket.

    2. Re:Prior art by Minimind · · Score: 1

      The story is by Arthur C. Clarke and is in Venture to the Moon that's collected in the book The Other Side of the Sky. Explorers on the moon set up an experiment to shoot sodium up into the thin lunar atmosphere so it would glow and be visible from Earth. But somebody sneakily swaps the nozzle used so it fires the sodium up in the shape of words - of a certain sugar based fizzy drink - and hence creates the largest advert ever seen!

    3. Re:Prior art by plsander · · Score: 1

      Heinlein in "The Man Who Sold The Moon" had the same sort of idea too.

    4. Re:Prior Art by localhost00 · · Score: 1

      Having worked at Pizza Hut, I can tell you that the deal was cancelled.

      --

      Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    5. Re:Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. A certain car company has a prior art claim in the form of a space-borne logo that's between 50 and 100 million years old.

  6. They've Come A Long Way by Naked+Chef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From communism to advertisements in space :) Still a sad commentary on capitalism and society, when not even space is safe from advertisers.

  7. Careful Now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    One foul up and we could all end up being told to "go stick your head in a pig"

  8. Prior Art? by Jaywalk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't Chairface Chippendale claim prior art on space ads?

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    1. Re:Prior Art? by Analogy+Man · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think there is "prior art on this ". I recall some flak with McDonalsd or someone like that looking to shine a golden arches up there somehow several years back.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    2. Re:Prior Art? by Jaywalk · · Score: 1
      I recall some flak with McDonalsd or someone like that looking to shine a golden arches up there somehow several years back.
      I'm pretty sure that was just this spoof as part of the BBC's h2g2 project.
      --
      ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    3. Re:Prior Art? by lrucker · · Score: 1
      Can't Chairface Chippendale claim prior art on space ads?

      He'd lose out to D.D. Harriman

    4. Re:Prior Art? by sledd_1 · · Score: 1

      Robert A Heinlen's character Delos D Harriman tried something similar to this in the 50s book "The Man Who Sold the Moon".

      Prior art? Pretty close...

      --
      I know a little sig that's just ten words long
  9. Just a concept by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's not get all worked up yet, it's just an idea some wacky russian had.

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
    1. Re:Just a concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Let's not get all worked up yet, it's just an idea some wacky russian had.

      Racist, and stupid. Where he was born is neither here nor there. And as for your suggestion that we bury our heads in the sand until it's too late..well, that's pretty stupid too.

      Are you one of those waddlers who stuffs their face full of MacDonalds and says `don't worry - I'll lose weight tomorrow`?

    2. Re:Just a concept by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      your usage of the word racist is incorrect. 'prejudice', 'regionalist', etc.. but not racist. so don't play the racist card.

    3. Re:Just a concept by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      I'll play the Racist card... and combine it with my Genocide card and destroy all cards of a certain race... hm... decisions, decisions...

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  10. As if there weren't already enough evidence... by Denyer · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...that Matt Groening was a prophet. *shakes head sadly*

    I wonder to what extent the patent is attributable to the numerous examples of this kind of behaviour in traditional science-fiction and popular media such as Futurama?

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    1. Re:As if there weren't already enough evidence... by adamscottphotos · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, Philip K. Dick got this one decades ago (Sales Pitch, 1954). I'm always suprised at the lack of sci-fi exploration out of the 'top 5', even by slashdot readers.

      --
      So quit your job, pack your bags, and move on out to snow country!
    2. Re:As if there weren't already enough evidence... by modder · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I actually included a link to a page describing Mr. Burns' sun blocking device, suggesting he might be the one to invent the pop up blocker. But that part got taken out.

    3. Re:As if there weren't already enough evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Groening lost me with that whole Bunnyhop hypocrisy. And general cluelessness revealed in later interviews (sample: "I have to defend my copyright, or it'll be diluted" - no you don't, Matt).

  11. Correction by Operating+Thetan · · Score: 4, Informative

    He hasn't patented the idea of adverts in space, as the precis suggests, he's patented a device for displaying them. A fairly important distinction

    --
    Worried you might not keep your virginity forever? Try new Linux(TM), guaranteed twice as effective as LARPing
    1. Re:Correction by scrytch · · Score: 2, Informative

      > He hasn't patented the idea of adverts in space, as the precis suggests, he's patented a device for displaying them. A fairly important distinction

      Not really. Patents of this kind are granted to a description of an actual device, not an idea. One doesn't actually need to produce the device itself, and indeed some people have managed to sneak some ridiculous ideas through, including a few faster-than-light communication device patents and probably a perpetual motion machine or two (the patent office is normally quite good however at rejecting any 100% efficient or over-unity machine)

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, perhaps the new trend will be to include "in space" in all future patent applications.

      I want "one click in space" patent...

  12. Little Dipper... by NemosomeN · · Score: 4, Funny

    By Pampered Chef, only $19.99.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  13. A giant DLP monitor? by Phoenix-kun · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article says it would use solar reflectors mounted on satellites to create the messages. In other words, each reflector could be considered a pixel in the display. I suppose it could work sort of like a giant DLP monitor. Now we just need a giant color wheel that could double as a space station.

    --
    Phoenix
    1. Re:A giant DLP monitor? by Turing+Machine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine the rainbow effect you'd get if the refresh rate wasn't high enough; launch a new ad campaign, and half the planet calls in sick with a blinding headache.

      Heh.

    2. Re:A giant DLP monitor? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I wonder how he plans to keep all those satellites positioned correctly? They won't be in the same orbit, possibly not even the same orbital period.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:A giant DLP monitor? by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Well the rural planet calls in sick with headaches. Unless the satellites are effective, all the city dwellers can't see the satellites due to all the light pollution from land-based advertising.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
  14. Aren't you actually required to have a prototype? by Queuetue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did he just point to a Coke can and say "Like this, but big!"

  15. The Ferengi's got there first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haven't you heard of a Ferengi Emporium class porn server relay station before?

    1. Re:The Ferengi's got there first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we don't encounter the Ferengi until the 22nd or 23rd or whatever the hell century it is that Star Trek takes place in. So therefore, if we do this, we do it before the Ferengi.

  16. Prior art already exists by BadDoggie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Various forms of space art have already explored the concepts and while they haven't used them specifically advertise, they already use reflectivity and the blackness of space outside the atmosphere so that the works can be seen.

    1. Re:Prior art already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell is this?

    2. Re:Prior art already exists by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1
      Robert Heinlein mentions advertising a soft drink on the surface of the moon, in a book dating back to the 1950s. Don't have the name of the book to hand but I could certainly find it.

      Luckily for this patent holder, the patent isn't on the idea of advertising in space (which is very very obvious), it's on a way to do it.

      Rich.

    3. Re:Prior art already exists by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Wasn't the 7up, er, 6+ story by Arthur C. Clarke? (It's been a while.)

      And there was this guy, whose idea might be workable with a single high power installation rather than a million-zillion laser pointers.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Prior art already exists by mjc_w · · Score: 1

      The book was "The Man Who Sold the Moon."

      --
      This is the Constitution.This is the Constitution under the Bush administration. Any questions?
  17. The Man Who Sold The Moon by Metryq · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sounds like the "carbon powder rocket to the moon" perversity mentioned in Heinlein's "The Man Who Sold The Moon." I can imagine some companies running more discreet ads that they paid to keep the skies clear.

    1. Re:The Man Who Sold The Moon by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

      Qualifies as prior art IMO, and should Virginia decide that the estate of REH needs another income stream she could follow SCO's path of revenue enhancement.

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
    2. Re:The Man Who Sold The Moon by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the exact same thing. I'm glad I scanned the responses first.

      The interesting thing about Heinlein's story was that a businessman was willing to buy advertising space on the moon, just so he could maintain its lack of advertisement.

      He (and his company's product) would then be hailed as wonderful for being the saviors of the pristine surface of our satellite.

      Cool story.

  18. Prior art by UfoZ · · Score: 1

    http://isometric.spaceninja.com/_/the_future_of_ad vertising/

    :)

  19. Reagan was right. by S3D · · Score: 5, Funny

    Antisatellite weapon have some uses.

  20. Will This Really Be Useful? by jrduncans · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "People would be able to see writing in the skies from the Earth no worse than they see the stars," he said.

    I know I can barely see the stars at all in the city. Is this only going to work to advertise to rural areas?

    1. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by NOLAChief · · Score: 1

      Speaking of seeing the stars, aren't ground based astronomers going to throw a fit when these things start interfering with their ability to conduct science?

    2. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by jrduncans · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but we all know that "knowledge" aiding in deciding which beer to buy is more important than any scientific gains. :)

      Another point I missed: so it doesn't work at all during the day? And at night people are generally inside, watching TV? Given the relative expense between a space ad and tv ad...

      Yeah, this seems unlikely to be a real concern, luckily.

    3. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1
      I know I can barely see the stars at all in the city. Is this only going to work to advertise to rural areas?

      Uh oh, if it blocks the ads, it won't be long before somebody asserts that air pollution is A Good Thing.

    4. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>And at night people are generally inside, watching TV? Given the relative expense between a space ad and tv ad...

      Knowing this, the advertisers will probably go for a younger demographic. Aim at people who's lifestyles include them being outside at night.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      "People would be able to see writing in the skies from the Earth no worse than they see the stars," he said. I know I can barely see the stars at all in the city. Is this only going to work to advertise to rural areas?

      I hope they are not visible from the city. Given that most advertisers' target audience is young and urban, not being able to see the ads in sky from the city would be a major disincentive.

      The day I look up at the moon from the streets of London and see a pepsi logo will be one of the saddest of my life.

      -Colin

    6. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      s/air/light/

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    7. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by jridley · · Score: 1

      Yes, just like radio astronomers throw a fit now because cell phones operate very near an important absorption frequency. And people will care just about as much.

      I'm an amateur astronomer myself. I don't like it either, but the truth is, most people don't give a rat's ass about seeing the stars. If they did, they wouldn't use cheap-ass mercury vapor insecurity lights to try to fend off their fear of the dark.

    8. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by localhost00 · · Score: 1

      Knowing Marketdroids, they will make the displays much brighter than the stars.

      --

      Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    9. Re:Will This Really Be Useful? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      The kind of people that like to walk at night and watch the stars will be offended by this kind of publicity and certainly won't buy the advertised product.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
  21. Prior Art? by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

    I think Pepsi and Pizza Hut may may already have done this. (Could one say a spaceship 'pops up'?)

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  22. following immediately: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fine, I'm filing the provisional patent application for space based laser to be used to block these pop-up adds. There is no property law that applies to space. Therefore, if he put's an ad up there we should blow it up.

    1. Re:following immediately: by vidarlo · · Score: 1

      No. They're owned by whomever sent them up, afaik. Also, see the UN faq on this. This faq takes the question of lost satelites, but then again, if it applies to lost satelits, I'd guess it applies to still working ones.

  23. Supernova = ultimate space popup by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Here's an image of the Crab Nebula supernova. It was invoked as part of an ad campaign for Jerry Bruckheimer's "Armageddon". A pretty big pop-up if you ask me

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  24. Oh Yeah! Do it, Baby! by PSaltyDS · · Score: 1, Funny

    Throw that system up there! I can't wait to hack THAT Jumbotron and put MY message across the whole sky!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    1. Re:Oh Yeah! Do it, Baby! by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      And put a goatse image on top of it.

      New anchor >> "Today... ... a highly obscene image depicting a man enlarging his *BEEP* is shown across the night sky in full view of elementary student in an excercise to view the stars. The same image is also viewed across the entire globe, illiciting countless enraged called to the StarShow Corporation, who owns the satellite that displayed said image..."

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  25. Great! by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now AT&T can have finally have a Death Star circling the planet!

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  26. Prior Art by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this guy was hoping the patent examiners hadn't read too much science fiction but couldn't ``Buy Jupiter'' by Asimov count as prior art?

    :-)

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  27. Who looks in the sky anyway? by Bilange · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, we're nerds, isnt it? Nerds just dont go much outside. And now they call that "News for nerds" !? Sheesh!

    --
    "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
    1. Re:Who looks in the sky anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that we don't go outside, it's that we go outside at night.

  28. Re:Aren't you actually required to have a prototyp by EricWright · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, not any more... yet another modification to US Patent law to "help out the little guy".

  29. Letter to the Human Race: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last night, I walked outside for a bit because it was such a beautiful evening (night). I looked up into the sky and just froze for about 10 minutes. The starlit night sky was just breathtaking and I couldn't help myself from just staring up and my flesh was acrawl with goosebumps. The ultimate humbling experience. For a moment, I left the confinds of my earthly hell and felt at peace amongst the bright pinpoints of light.
    I get enough of the human race here on earth, let me have the sky as my own sanctuary, please keep your popup ads to yourselves.

    1. Re:Letter to the Human Race: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...and just think how much more captivating it would be with the words "Enjoy Coca Cola!" slowly orbiting overhead.
      *shudders and vows to claw out his eyeballs if it should ever come to this*

    2. Re:Letter to the Human Race: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, that's deep. I think I feel some tears coming on.

  30. I'm looking forward to this-it will be hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    OT III documents + advert visible to entire world = several very pissed off $cientologists

  31. Even if by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shouldn't this violate some sort of International Space Law?

    Even if if didn't violate a law, there are some things so repugnant that they shouldn't be done.

    -Colin

    1. Re:Even if by larien · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when has that stopped anyone?

    2. Re:Even if by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      Good. About time you updated your weblog.. I have been waiting to read this for a while now.

      Trust me you are the soap opera for my office :)

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    3. Re:Even if by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Trust me you are the soap opera for my office :)

      How do you mean that? -Colin

    4. Re:Even if by Poeir · · Score: 1

      Well, stopped marketers, you mean.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    5. Re:Even if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Editor's correction: Since when has that stopped Fox?

  32. I'm remembering the Futurama show where by RCO · · Score: 1

    there are adds running in peoples dreams.
    The one guy from the past is complaining and the others ask how they advertised in his time.

    'BillBoards, radio, TV, loudspeaker, busses, snailmail, email, telephone, buildings, sidewalks, flyers, t-shirts, hats, underwear,.... but never in our dreams'

    here's another to add to the list...

    --
    'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
    1. Re:I'm remembering the Futurama show where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot bananas.

  33. Geeks in Space? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Informative

    What does this have to do with Geeks in Space, the long-dormant Slashdot radio show?

    This is miscategorized! And here you got my hopes up that there would be a new episode after all these years...

    1. Re:Geeks in Space? by alman · · Score: 1

      Popup ad for vapourware :)

  34. Won't catch on anyway... by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    Too expensive for "first in" advertisers, and the language barrier would cause too much uproar. (How many people will be pissed off to see chinese ads filling the sky?) And yes, I know there are certain things (AT&T, etc.) have fairly universally recognizable logos.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  35. Prior art by farnerup · · Score: 2, Informative

    Zorglub did this already in 1961, although with limited success.

  36. Prior art by AlecC · · Score: 1

    Plenty of prior art in Science Fiction, for the general problem; this guy could only patent a technique, not the general idea.

    One of the best ones I saw was a short-short by, I think, Arthur C Clarke, which obviously dates from the Cold War days. General panic in Washington when the Soviet Union manages to paint the moon Red, displaying the power of Communist technology. Don't worry, say NASA. A few daya later, the Coca-Cola "swirl" appears across it, displaying the power of Capitalist technology.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  37. IANAL by smoondog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Shouldn't this violate some sort of International Space Law?

    Maybe I'm wrong but I think it is permitted to have patent protection on an illegal invention.

    -Sean

  38. Hey, Taco! by BJH · · Score: 1

    Where's the radio show, eh?!

  39. You'll get used to it. by brejc8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember some friends describing a trip to the then USSR and saying that Moscow is very dull and gray but they couldnt put their finger on why. They eventually realised that there was no advertising. More recently when they saw some footage of some Moscow riots there were loads of adverts plastered all over the place they commented how much nicer the place looks with bright colours and lights.

    Im sure we will have the same situation in the future where you go for a holiday in some poorer country and complain that the space just looks balck and boring.

    1. Re:You'll get used to it. by fdiskne1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I took a vacation to "second-world" country and it was so nice not seeing advertisements. The only ad for a product that I recognized was a sign at the boat filling station stating where the fuel came from.

      Here I've been thinking that if the in-your-face advertising got too bad, I just move to a country like that. If ads in space "fly", I may have to build myself a rocket and move to Mars.
      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    2. Re:You'll get used to it. by jeni+generic · · Score: 1

      If their sky is dull and gray, I am assuming this is because of industrial and vehicular pollution, which would affect the also visibilty of the ads, right?

      --


      -"Food is disgusting, it's what they make shit from."-
  40. A Triumph of Literalism by spincycle1953 · · Score: 1

    At last, there will be, literally, advertising "space" salesmen. I'm looking forward to advertising "time" sales scoring a similar achievement...adding a new dimension, so to speak, to the ad game. I just don't want them thinking too much about "air" though.

    --
    My other machine is a lever.
  41. AT&T logo by aquabat · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's no moon! That's a space station!!!

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  42. Eat at Joes? by They_Call_Me_Spanky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This would be the equivalent of projecting an advertising image on a natural landmark or such.

    Imagine taking a pic of the family with Niagara Falls or (insert landmark) in the background and having a momento for the rest of your life to 'Drink Coca Cola' hovering above your heads.

    It's visual pollution.

    --
    -Oy Vey
    1. Re:Eat at Joes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billboards are all over the place. I applaud states that outlaw them.

  43. Undead! by UncleAlias · · Score: 1

    I'd rather drive a spike through the AT&T logo...

    --

    Stéphane "Alias" Gallay
    Now, where did I put this witty quote?..

  44. Prior art by mark-t · · Score: 1

    We already look up at the night sky and see pictures. This method may have been developed by the ancient Babylonians, but is nevetheless well over 5 thousand years old. Called "constellations" today, any patents that may have existed on how these images told the stories that they did have long since entered the public domain.

  45. War by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The day some asshat decides to pollute the night sky with a pop up that cant be killed is the day we find out if war can be declared on a company. Several million slashgeeks will figure out a way to shoot this would be obscenity down from earth. Our governments our bound not to destroy each others satelites, but private citizens are not. Especially when they start shooting from international waters.

    1. Re:War by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      I doubt you'd need to SHOOT it down (though that might be a lot more entertaining).

      No security is so perfect that it can't fall to a sufficiently motivated attacker. I don't know about anybody else, but if I look up the sky one evening and see a big ass advertisement blocking a portion of it, I'm going to become instantly sufficiently movitated.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    2. Re:War by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Were certainly not going to shoot it down with a gun, I don't care if you've got a battleship, I concede that point. But who said anything about a gun? I have in mind lots of geeks with really big rockets, lots of motivation and a few nervous government entities offering at the last minute to take care of it for us. One way or another it will come down. Then we find the biggest lart we can and hunt down the person that subjected us to it in the first place.

    3. Re:War by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      But who said anything about a gun?

      Ummm... just you, actually. :^)

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    4. Re:War by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      Now there's a marketing idea!

      Make a pop-up ad in space, and clearly state that it will "go away" when someone phones in and buys the product. First sale, you turn it off for 5 minutes, then put the next ad in the series up (rotate through about 20 or so).

      Maybe the virus people can start selling "subscriptions" to proxy popup blocking in the sky... if enough customers want it, we'll buy off the advertising (except our own of course).

      yes, it's a Sick Sad World.

    5. Re:War by dave420 · · Score: 1
      It must be incredible to have an ass you can pull space-ready missiles out of... How does that work, exactly?

      Seriously, getting all riled up is one thing, but being able to blow something up in space is something completely different.

      Most people here hate Microsoft yet they've not been blown up and they're on Earth. :-P

    6. Re:War by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      One forgets there are plenty slashgeeks that work for NASA and the military. I'm pretty certain there are probably some that work in similiar capacities in other governments. Between the lot of them and a few rocket enthusiasts they'll know get it done. Plenty will be willing to contribute materials and caffeine to a good cause.

      Plus your forget that this combines two things with very strong appeal to slashgeeks. Anti-marketing streaks infamous in the ad business and sheer hack value. Please note that I never claimed that I could do it. Think of it as a team building exercise with out of the world benefits.

  46. From the article by Mirk · · Score: 1, Funny
    In ``inventor'' of this thing is quoted as saying:
    People would be able to see writing in the skies from the Earth no worse than they see the stars.

    Speaking as someone who lives in a big city (London), I can hardly even remember what stars look like. A combination of light-pollution, smog and good, old-fashioned English weather mean that they are hardly ever visible.

    So neither will the adverts be.

    Cool: a use for pollution! As an ad-blocker.

    --

    --
    What short sigs we have -
    One hundred and twenty chars!
    Too short for haiku.
  47. Sealab quote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Marketing drones - "We've perfected a technology that would allow us to put a giant billboard into space. Picture it, Dick: your advertisement would be seen by everyone in the entire world! Of course, there would be catastrophic tidal waves, but the upside: kids love to surf!"

    Suit - "That would be a choice demographic..."

    Dick - "Gentlemen....surf's up!"

    1. Re:Sealab quote? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      "You're not getting it. The scorpions are symbolic--"
      "--of the fizz! Kcht! Kcht Kcht!"

  48. In Corporate America by perdelucena · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Corporate America you see Space in Ads...

    ----------
    Join orkut /. community!!. It's community, not communism!

  49. New law passed thru congress... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

    the CAN-STARs act.

  50. Missing the stars by Wassini · · Score: 0

    I already miss the late-night walks with my girlfriend under a clear sky with bright stars.

    Also Disney will have to rewrite their x-mas song "When You look uppon a .... coke"

    --
    Lars Bo Wassini
  51. Typical Jerry B. by ianscot · · Score: 1
    the Crab Nebula supernova... invoked as part of an ad campaign for Jerry Bruckheimer's "Armageddon".

    Why am I not surprised that Jerry Bruckheimer would use a totally unrelated phenomena to plug his movie about an asteroid bearing down on earth? This is the guy whose Japanese fleet was sailing along with nuclear subs for escort before the attack in Pearl Harbor... Criminy.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  52. One good thing by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    about the Son of Star Wars program favored by GW Bush is that at the very least, it WILL have one use:

    Shooting down space spam.

    (probably not, but it's fun to imagine it)

    1. Re:One good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun, but...it would more likely be used to protect said space spam from nerd-launched grafitti from our Astro-slings(tm).

    2. Re:One good thing by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      In a room deep inside Cheyenne Mountain...

      *WHOOP WHOOP WHOOP*

      "We have a launch event!"
      "Launch event!"
      "Tracking source..."
      "Initiating contact with COMNOR..."
      "Launch site located...it's in Washington state."
      "What?!"
      "COMNOR's on the horn...he says to confirm the launch site."
      "It's confirmed."
      "Understood. Contact CIC."
      "Contacting CIC."
      "CIC on the line. He's authorizing a launch."
      "Understood."
      "Linux launch identified, tracking...thirty-one minutes."
      "Uh...CIC says he has a call from Redmond...SOFTCOM claims it was an accident...seems a worm took down their database and they thought it was the beginning of preemptive strike. SOFTCOM wants us to coordinate an Imbed launch to take out the Linux before it goes terminal."
      "What does CIC want?"
      "He's, um...leaving it up to us."
      "...Wow."
      "Yeah."
      "So...what do you think?"
      "Um...what's an Imbed anyway?"
      "I, uh...I don't remember."
      "Neither do I..."
      "Well, can't coordinate what we don't know about."
      "Nope, 'fraid not."
      "Too bad."
      "Yup...too bad."
      "How long?"
      "Twenty-nine minutes."
      "Twenty-nine minutes...ah...break it out boys...the good stuff...this is one to celebrate."

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  53. Reciprocity . . . by 93,000 · · Score: 0

    I have no problem with him putting ads on my sky, providing he lets me put ads of my choosing on his house, car, forehead, etc.

    Talk about invasive.

  54. Old joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    At the Whitehouse:

    --Mr Nixon, Mr Nixon, the Russians painted the moon red, in honor of communism. What should we do?

    --Don't worry, Henry, our boys will think of something.

    Next morning at the Kremlin:

    --Comrade Brezhnev, Comrade Brezhnev, the Americans painted "Coca Cola" on top.

  55. Some random "observations" by prestidigital · · Score: 1
    1. Once again, evidence supporting the theory that nothing is worthwhile unless it can be tied to either "product" or the military.
    2. Imagine the art one could create.
    3. Imagine the Emergency Broadcast System using this thing - for emergencies at night anyway ;^)
    4. Depends on how he's writing that patent. If he's patenting his system of satellites and sunlight reflectors then someone will get around it. If his patent says something like "A system for displaying light-based content in space...The preferred embodiment is to use a array of distributed satellites and sunlight reflectors..." then maybe he's trying to wrangle in on any method that would display content in space.
    5. It's not about the patent anyway. It's about whether or not we are on our way to becoming innundated with astral advertising (and all sorts of other man-made luminations in space).
    1. Re:Some random "observations" by Frennzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not always the case.

      At Burning Man two years ago, some guys created a sodium-arc laser, and used it to beam messages into space using simple modulation. They had a fairly large booth setup where folks could put in their message, and vote on other messages others had already put in. The messages that got the highest votes were beamed out every night into the sky to a location (constellation) requested by the message author.

      Pointless? Most likely. Cool? Definitely.

      They also took some time to draw patterns on the bluffs surrounding the desert floor, just for kicks.

      So, art is alive and well...you just have to know where to look.

  56. Has to be said... by linuxrunner · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would make one HECK of a Bat Signal!!!

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  57. Won't bother me by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    This won't bother me. I've installed Google atmosphere, which contains space popup blocking.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Won't bother me by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

      Google Atmosphere, of course, being an anti-satellite missile system.

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
  58. System tray time by AMD-lover · · Score: 1

    Your system tray time may be wrong! Switch to space time (continuum) now!

  59. What's next? The Grand Canyon? by eegad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If necessary, this will have to be stopped using the concept of ecological conservation. Every inch of nature's beauty does not need to be crammed with advertisements.

  60. Laser paint logos on the moon? by freelunch · · Score: 1

    Years ago, a friend and I thought of using lasers to paint logos on the moon.

    Of course, at the time, we were both working at Amazon and worried that they would try to steal and patent our idea. So we didn't do it.

  61. Danger danger Will Robinson by Underholdning · · Score: 1

    So when the German company "Em Wolb" writes that in giant letters readable from earth, or the Japanese cup noodle "Sruoy Pu" produced giant letters on the sky, what will the aliens see? I mean - they see it from the other side, and read it backwards. This is the end of man kind! Prepare to be invaded by furious aliens!
    Aah.. geek humor, and I'm only on my third cup of coffee.

  62. Awww man by ViceClown · · Score: 0

    What a tease! I thought there was going to be a new GIS episode!!! No magical riffing stylings of CowboyNeal or dynomite drop-ins by Nate MixMaster Oostendorp?

    It's just not fair!! ;-)

    --
    Have a Happy.
  63. Finally! by mr_resident · · Score: 1

    A practical use for StarWars Technology!
    -

  64. Why the big deal... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    You've been mooned since the day you were born. Now, all of a sudden, you're concerned?

  65. great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing you know, AOL will be putting a satellite in orbit to throw one of those damned wooden cd cases down at your location.

  66. oh lord by InaneDrivel · · Score: 0

    all we need to do now is create the dupey and vacation in elbonia.

  67. Just perfected the technology to put ads in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bad news is that this creates massive tidal waves. But the upshot--kids love to surf!

    You know, that's a choice demographic...

  68. I, for one... by frs_rbl · · Score: 0

    welcome our new advertising overlords

    --
    This is not my opinion. Actually, it's not even an opinion. And I'm nowhere to be seen near it
  69. Re:Prior Art: I know, RTFA (Impracticality?) by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a very different device being claimed here, one that can project light down to earth, not just painting something on a rocket.

    So true. Mod me Embarassed!

    But now that I look at this, I wonder about its practicality. The mirror constellation will either need some very large mirrors to project sunlight over "intercontinental" distances or only work for small areas at a time. (a flat mirror in GEO would only create about a 200 mile diameter cone of visiblity on Earth)

    Also, he will have a bit of a trade-off on the orbit for the system. LEO will put his satellites in Earth's shadow soon after dark (his sats will compete with dusk and then go dark). LEO is also hit-or-miss on whether the sats are flying over the target audience at exactly dusk (perhaps a resonant orbit would work). GEO provides better light and is stationary above the target audience, but the constellation will need to be much bigger (span hundreds of miles) and the mirrors much bigger to create a visible sign.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  70. What about Prior Art? by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 2

    I remember Bugs Bunny cartoons "Duck Rogers" with Daffy and Porky riding around in space doging space billboards... Perhaps WB should be awarded this patent?

  71. AT&T by Mr804 · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's no moon, that's a space station!

  72. Drink Coke by SuperChuck69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't shake this mental image of the International Space Station with a giant Drink Coke logo scrawled across the side... (Come to think of it, private funding for such projects isn't such a bad idea: "This launch brought to you by Levitra - if we can get a rocket up, imagine what we can do for you!")

    --
    :wq
  73. Might not be so bad IFF by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They were inflatable mylar structures with a VERY LIMITED lifespan, say, a month tops.

    If someone wants to spend a billion dollars to have a logo a quarter of the size of the moon for a few weeks thats only really visible in rural areas, let them.

    Folks have been chomping at the bit for this kind of stuff for decades. Ever since those big foil sphere satellites in the 60s were visible from earth.

    Pizza Hut is prepared to spend a billion to the Russians for their logo up there, the producers of the Lord of the Rings contacted folks about putting an inflatable ring in orbit to hock their movie. The Eiffel Tower corporation wanted a space sculpture to commemerate their anniversary. There was talk of putting something up to celebrate the millenium..

    It's going to happen. Whether you want to call it 'art' or 'advertising'.. Best to lay the ground rules now.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  74. This has been a possibility by JawFunk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This idea has been around for some time, but noone decided to patent it. Considering the many different ways you can link satellites, this is probably not the only patent that could be used for space ads.

    The reason no company has decided to put up ads in space is that it would deface the only untouched place man has in this world, generating bad publicity rather than revenue.

    --
    [Please sign here]
    1. Re:This has been a possibility by Ill_Omen · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the actual reason there are no ads in space is that it's too expensive and you can't target your message effectively.

    2. Re:This has been a possibility by JawFunk · · Score: 1

      Expensive...well that's where innovative andefficient technology comes into play. Also, if you could reach 5 bn customers, I think you would pay hefty. Send a fewsatellites up for three weeks, then have them burn up in the atmosphere, send the next ad up there. Sounds like a package deal to me.

      --
      [Please sign here]
  75. Re:They've Come A Long Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Perhaps, some day, space will be safe from Communists.

  76. retarted patents must cease by TrebLib · · Score: 1

    They have to make a law .. SOON ... that makes it so you can only patent a physical item .. not "the right to " ie. the right to put adds in space, or the right to have a back button on your web page ...

  77. "Now Over To The Weather Forecast..." by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Funny
    The temperature today will be a warm 22 degrees centigrade with humidity at 85%...

    There will be a South-Westerly breeze of 12 mph...

    Pepsi-rise will be at 6:14am and Nike-set will be at 8:48pm...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  78. Re:Prior Art: I know, RTFA (Impracticality?) by arivanov · · Score: 2, Interesting
    mirror constellation will either need some very large mirrors

    Which in turn will generate a considerable amount of thrust so it will not stay in one place.

    Classic solar sail.

    In btw, this is feasible as a side effect for a solar sail ship. You make your sail advertise pepsi and get some dosh towards launch costs. Considering that solar sails are more then 17 years away (life of the patent) I do not see anything to worry about.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  79. This means war! by Vincman · · Score: 1

    I hate spam so much that I wish the worst, most painful death onto the person that sends it to me. If ads were to ever to ruin my clear starry nights, I won't hesitate to join any army that wants to wage war against the country/government that legalised it.

    Not that I believe this will actually happen!

    Btw. I think if it does work, it is a great invention. It would have many applications useful to humanity. Such as "Watch out! Big boulder comming your way!". I'm saddened that the inventor couldn't come up with something better than trying to make tons of money.

  80. Not necessarily bad by fnj · · Score: 1

    Obtaining and holding this patent is not necessarily a bad thing. Under the right circumstances, the usual reservations about patents could work to the common good in this case. If the holder is incorruptible and dedicated to the common good, he will simply charge a royalty of (apologies to Dr. Evil) One Hundred Trillion dollars for each instance of use. Presto. That particular mode of advertising has now been precluded, or, what's the worst thing that could happen - someone actually comes up with a $1E14 payment, gets his precious ad, but the patent holder now has unlimited funds to apply to feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, curing the sick, etc.

    Naw, I didn't think so. That's not how capitalism works :-(

  81. Look at it this way.... by BigGar' · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The patent will expire before he's ever able to make it a reality.

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    1. Re:Look at it this way.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > The patent will expire before he's ever able to make it a reality.

      At which point it will be public domain, and any corporation can do it with impunity.

    2. Re:Look at it this way.... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      I like this better than what I'd originally planned to say...

      that patents without present useful application are often overturned...

      for instance, the human genome patent applications were denied for the most part because the applicants couldn't show an immediate use for what they had discovered.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  82. Look ma! an UFO ! by Ashtead · · Score: 1
    I'd imagine that the UFO-spotting people could have some fun with this. In particular if there is another message-hacking incident like the one in North Carolina a few weeks ago. Then somebody's base surely would be advertised as being belong to somebody else....

    Still, despite the obvious comical aspects, I'd hate to see this sort of thing come into being, and I expect these people to agree with me on that.

    --
    (with thanks to subgeek)

    --
    SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  83. There was a short story by danila · · Score: 1

    There was a short sci-fi story about such an idea implemented. It started with astronomers noticing some stars moving a bit too fast, then faster and then stopping, forming an ad for some soap. Eventually the battery in the device run out and the sky was restored. Sadly, I don't remember the name of the story or the author. :(

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  84. novelty??? by ajagci · · Score: 1

    Where is the novelty in this patent? That idea has been around almost as long as rockets and satellites have been part of science fiction.

    1. Re:novelty??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be so, but when an examiner rejects something, it's not on his or her whim of what the examiner deems novel or obvious, it's based on whether or not an examiner can make a Legal case that can stand ina court of law. Obviously this requires evidence.

      Furthermore, the inventor didnt patent the idea, he patented a device. This is a crucial distinction

      Which means if you want to reject it against a lawyers arguments in a court of law, your prior art probably needs to be tangible too, (or it could be a process)

    2. Re:novelty??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which means if you want to reject it against a lawyers arguments in a court of law, your prior art probably needs to be tangible too, (or it could be a process)

      The inventor doesn't have to produce a working device anymore, why should prior art claims have to?

      Furthermore, the inventor didnt patent the idea, he patented a device. This is a crucial distinction

      Indeed: the inventor patented a device that has been described numerous times previously in publications in such an amount of detail that anybody skilled in the art can implement it.

  85. The new Hacking contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants to take bets on how long it will be before theres a hacking contest to put the goatse guy picture up there.

  86. Red Dwarf by waterford0069 · · Score: 3, Funny
    This reminds me of a sub-plot in the _book_ Red Dwarf (as opposed to the TV series) where there was a ship that was sent out into inter-stellar space to make stars go nova, and create a giant, pixelated "Drink Coke" message in the sky.

    This was the ship that Lister and Cat found on an asteroid/moon with Kryten waiting in it (and also the one that Kryten caused to crash by "washing" the computer).

    1. Re:Red Dwarf by greenpanda · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, you are the only person to realise that this whole "ad in the sky" malarky actually invented in the book "Red Dwarf".

      I'd be modding you up now, if only I understood the whole modding process.

      Congrats.

      --
      PHP
    2. Re:Red Dwarf by plutonium+binky · · Score: 1

      That was the Nova 5, and the message was "Coke is Life" I believe. It was mostly funny for the irony.

    3. Re:Red Dwarf by cyt0plas · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ya need "mod points", which the server gives you when it feels like it. By posting, you lose the right to mod that thread.

      You'll figure it out when the points come - if you don't manage to get yourself blacklisted first.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
  87. It won't. Americans need it. by MotherInferior · · Score: 4, Funny

    Americans, by and large, have bought hook-line-and-sinker the idea of perceived value. With an entire nation of walking Gap ads, chatting up their "peeps" on a Nokia cell-shackle, how else can you arbitrate but with quality of marketing?

    Trendster: Check it, Kiki. I got me an nGage.

    Kiki: Eeew.

    Trendster: Whatever.

    [two weeks later]

    Trendster: Yo, Kiki. I got me an iPod.

    Kiki: Marry me.

    Trendster: Solid.

    1. Re:It won't. Americans need it. by AndrewCox · · Score: 2

      I think I missed your point - are you saying that the nGage is actually good and the iPod is not, but marketing only makes us think this is the case?

      Is there a nicer-designed, compact MP3 hard drive player than the iPod? Is there a worse portable video game system than the nGage (in the same price range)?

      --
      The Red Pill ... all I'm o
    2. Re:It won't. Americans need it. by MotherInferior · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're putting too much thought into it.

      My point is that the actual quality of the product is irrelevant. Its value, for most folks, is determined not by quality but by perceived value. What does everyone else think about this product? To wit, a Gucci/Versace/Prada bag is not valuable because of how long it lasts/how well it performs but because it will get you [insert laudatory expression] from your [insert peer-group expression]. Or, it will get you [insert copulatory expression].

      Perhaps it would have been better to use a non-geek example. Geeks tend to go to the other extreme. They have a habit of wearing fringe products like medals, if there is any real quality to the product. I.e. quality (to the exclusion of perceived value) is king.

      So, in geek circles, the nGage sucks because, well, it just sucks as a product. The iPod is cool because, well, it does its job, and then some. Within Geekworld, these products' perceived values are (as they should be) based on their quality. Geeks are hardly mainstream, though. Outside Geekworld you'd be hard pressed to find someone who could give you a substantial reason for saying that the nGage sucks. Or that the iPod is cool. For most Americans, value is based on the tenuous (and highly manipulable) network of popular consensus. In essence, the marketing world is providing a kind of spritual leadership for the public consciousness.

    3. Re:It won't. Americans need it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm pretty sure the nGage is pretty universally considered sucky. I think you would be lucky to find any video game store that's sold more than a dozen.

    4. Re:It won't. Americans need it. by crabpeople · · Score: 1
      "have a habit of wearing fringe products like medals"

      dude thats super cool im going to start wearing my grandfathers old ww2 medals around. that my friend is a trend i can reprezent!

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  88. How quickly ... by RimmerExperience · · Score: 1

    ... the free market takes hold!

  89. Bring back Geeks in Space! by Neuracnu+Coyote · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I have nothing more productive to say today.

    --
    --
  90. Remember When? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Adverts were once banned from the internet, as well. Also (at least in the U.S.) there were never any commercials at the beginning of movies shown in a cinema, just coming attractions. There was just too much money to be made. Same applies to Space, or any other forum/medium once its use becomes more mainstream.

  91. Bard says by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    CASSIUS
    The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
    But in ourselves, that we are underlings.

    BRUTUS
    But yonder stars tell me wonderous Enzyte shall make us underlings no longer!

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Bard says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my feelings for you
      have always been free

  92. Yuk! by Ludo.Sanders · · Score: 1

    I thought there finaly was a new episode. What a disappointment!

    --
    "It is not because no one sees the truth that it becomes a mistake" (Mahatma Gandhi)
  93. Remember the first time your dad took you out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the first time your dad took you out at 1am into the backyard with a telescope?

    No, I never knew my dad. He left before I was even born and I only know his first name. One person in my family owned a telescope, but never used it and I wasn't allowed to touch it.

  94. Space Ads by kk5wa · · Score: 1

    How about causing several stars to supernova that are lined up in such a manner where their light all reaches Earth at the same time and spells "Coke"?

    Just a fantasy of mine....

    --
    sine puella vita suget
    1. Re:Space Ads by dubstop · · Score: 1

      Kryten, is that you?

  95. Prior Art by overshoot · · Score: 1

    Arthur C. Clarke anticipated this (as so much else!) with one of the Tales from the White Hart.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  96. Next it will be the moon by PonyHome · · Score: 1

    What does "CHA" mean?

    1. Re:Next it will be the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why is there a bite out of the Moon?

  97. Good thing by IroNick · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing he patented this now, because of two reasons:
    1. Is so adead in time that the patent will expire. Or:
    2. This will soon be a reality, but because of the patent there won't be much of it.

  98. Virginia Heinlein is dead by Metryq · · Score: 1

    http://www.sfwa.org/news/vheinlein.htm

  99. Looks like its time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like its time for someone to start a new do it yourself ground to space missile site.

  100. no more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't see how this is much worse than billboard ads, or ads hidden inside content such as movies. It's fascinating to see people get in an uproar over the notion of space ads, and yet we continue to allow people to invade and pollute our minds here on Earth.

    It is time that we restore the sanity. The concept of sellers having to shout and try to attract attention in order to sell their product is outdated. The inefficiency and waste involved in flooding the environment with your advertisements to make a few sales is tremendous and not worth the price.

    We now live in an age with the technology and distribution power so that we can essentially reverse our advertising methods. Rather than the seller going to the potential buyer, the buyer can go to the seller. We can designate specific areas, which can be privately or collectively maintained, and use these as advertising directories where sellers put all the info about the products, reviews, and any snazzy marketing tricks in these directories. This is how I currently shop anyways, by using the power of the information I *ACTIVELY SEEK OUT* to decide what to buy. By implementing such a method we will eliminate the need for intrusive ads, and will probably cut some of the fluff from our product lines as well.

  101. Is that to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia space pops up in adverts?

  102. Re:GORILLA PENIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how long is a whale penis? do whales actually have penises anyway?

  103. Ads to aliens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We might as well send ads to space while we're at it! I can just imagine a very wide grid of these ad satelites displaying a marque not only towards earth, but towards the sky. The latter might say something like "We welcome our new alien overlords!"

  104. by cosmic coincidence... by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    ...today's "Foxtrot" touches on the same subject! He just needed to change the very last speech bubble (Jason's) to say "Maybe there will be...."

    (3/11/04 if you need to look through the archives)

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  105. The Man Who Sold the Moon by DocTBone · · Score: 1

    Heinlein wrote a short story involving this concept back in the '40s -- a businessman convinced one company to back his privately financed moon shot by claiming that a rival company was planning on painting their logo on the moon's face.

    --
    To swim, only to die at the edge.
  106. The Average Person by dmomo · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing about this sort of thing for some time now. Anyone I have ever mentioned it to, showed signs of either discomfort or outrage with the idea. If most people in the world are disgusted by the notion, how will they react when it is put into practice? How will this affect the company doing the advertising?

    Perhaps, the reaction will be like that to spam. With zero or little marginal cost with respect to an increasing audience, a large enough number can be reached so that the venture will be profitable even if only a small percentage react positively.

    But, they are treading on rather sacred ground. The heavens. I will not be suprised if action is taken against the advertiser that is even more viscious than the lengths some people go to against spammers! Will the extra revenue be worth it? If not, maybe only those who do not fear bad press will have the incentive to use it.

    1. Re:The Average Person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >how will they react when it is put into practice?

      I would hope that they turn to extremely violent, unmistakable outrage and literally destroy the people responsible for the idea, as well as the entire system that fostered them.

      This is NOT an area where peaceable solutions are appropriate.

  107. Obscene and just too far. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    The skies belongs to everyone and to put up a message of any type is just some violation on too personal of a level to even describe.

  108. When Advertising Rules The Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before some person or company secures the rights to a machine that blocks out the sun like the device Mr. Burns made in The Simpsons so we have 24/7 advertisements?

  109. other uses by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    i think using space for advertising is just horribly wrong, but this could be pretty useful for other situations- such as giving directions to the public in the event of a disaster that affects a large area ...or for psy-ops in a war- no more dropping hundreds of leaflets, just paint a giant death's head in the night sky and say "surrender or die!" actually, i'm not sure how i feel about the last one... :)

  110. Adds in space by manon · · Score: 1

    This guy is going to be rich.
    The moment all the big companies are based on Mars, they will have to pay him to place billboards on the side of the road to Mars!

    --
    42 + 1 = 42
  111. Does this guy have a prototype? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
    No? Then why a patent.

    stupidity of the idea aside, I am tired of people being able to patent Ideas. You should have a certain amount of protection time to come up with something, perhaps, but if you don't, you should be fined by the patent office.

    The whole point of patents (I thought) was to protect the little guy so that he had time to create/establish his idea.

    And software and business method patents are bullshit to begin with.

  112. Obvious military application by varjag · · Score: 1

    'Lay down your arms' enscribed in the sky from horizon to horizon, could make an effect for the army of an invaded state.

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  113. The answer is easy: by eforhan · · Score: 1

    I'm going to start up a company that paints stars in the night sky. Invest now!

  114. When this happens... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

    I say we pay for an enormous light and aim it directly at the reflectors to block it. That will take advertisers offline (at least until the govt does the horrible thing and regulates space advertising).

  115. But we all love BIG corporations . . . right? by Szynaka · · Score: 1

    "When deep space exploration ramps up, it will be corporations that name everything. The IBM Stellar Sphere. The Philip Morris Galaxy. Planet Starbucks."

  116. Nothing New by Shafe · · Score: 1

    This idea is nothing new: the Coca Cola company almost put a massive ad in space by painting the moon with lasers from Earth, as a Texas-based advertising firm described. It never happened due to incredibly poor taste, no matter how cool the technology. I'm sure this method will meet a similar fate.

    1. Re:Nothing New by anubi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You know, I would really like to know how much power it would take from Earth to illuminate the moon sufficiently for it to be easily recoginized from Earth... especially knowing the moon is not especially of a reflective nature.

      The moon I see is illuminated by terawatts of sunlight. I suppose if I sat down and figured out exactly how many square feet of surface area was facing the sun at the time, and luminous flux per square foot, I could arrive at a more precise answer, but for now, I just know the answer is " a lot. ".

      Trying to keep the light focused as it leaves our constantly changing refractive atmosphere might be a lot of fun too.

      The only chance I see they could try is to try to do it during an eclipse?

      If I didn't know any better, I would think this is an extension of...eh... wasn't Science Fiction author Robert Heinlein thinking along this line?

      Just glad its not a government thing. I can buy Wal-Mart cola at 50 cents per 2 liter jug, if Coca Cola wants to spend their money on this, but I have no alternative to paying tax. That's my money gone - it won't live to support the economy by ending up in a local businesses cash register.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  117. Space Invading Spam by myownkidney · · Score: 1
    Advertising, especially of the unsolicited type, has completely swamped cyber space (read here for more infor). Is it going to happen to outer space soon too?

    I believe so. There's nothing to preven rogue states that have capabilities to send rockets to space (there are many of them) from blasting into space space-spam.

    The light from our cities have completely blotted out the stars. So as far as astronomers are concerned, this scheme doesn't make a big difference. I presume this space-spam will probably be targetting cities anyway.

    As for people in the cities, a night in the open could once again be a night under star light, even if the stars are man made, and they spell out pr0n sites.

  118. wel as space isn't owned ... by Ernest · · Score: 1

    ... anybody can shot it down too.

    Beside any French people here remember: "Z comme Zorglub" ?

    Except for the silly fact the commercial it was written backwards. It worked beautifully!

    So there is prior Art. ;^)

    --
    Ernest J.W. ter Kuile
  119. Am I the only one ... by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    ... who was immediately reminded of Chairface Chippendale?

  120. Dateline: 11th March 2024 by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    HOUSTON, TX:- Bill Gates, CEO Microsoft, today flew into Johnson Space Center in order to seek assistance from NASA scientists following the failure of MOGAP (Microsoft Orbital Geostationary Advertisement Platform) this morning.

    The 2000m high LCD projection screen, powered by Microsoft's Windows 2020 operating system and launched only last year, suffered a catastrophic outage this morning. Up until 10:06am Pacific time, the screen had been displaying "Microsoft - We're Taking You Here Today" when observers on the ground noticed a flickering of the screen for a few seconds before the screen totally failed.

    A NASA spokesperson today stated that scientists are still trying to understand the causes behind the failure and expect some progress within the next 48 hours.

    In the interim, contributors to the venerable Internet discussion forum "Slashdot" declared this event as "Microsoft's Blue Skies Of Death".

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  121. ObRefs by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    OK, let's get them out of the way...

    Arthur C Clarke =- "Watch This Space"

    Grant Naylor - Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers

    Any others to add?

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  122. Middle ages here we come by jayhags · · Score: 0

    There was a Dilbert episode about this.

    The pointy haired manager wanted them to launch a billboard into space. When they did it bumped into other satellites breaking technology and forcing society back to the middle ages.

  123. Saving Hubble? by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What a brave new world we live in. With such people's in it.

    When space itself is fair game for Spammers and the only way to see the stars is to be OFF THE F*CKING PLANET.

    At least there's still day-time.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  124. Heinlein Had The Idea First by sjvn · · Score: 1

    In The Man Who Sold the Moon, Robert A. Heinlein's billionarie hero D. D. Harriman gets us to the moon, by any trick he can come up with including selling the idea of using carbon black to turn the moon into a giant advertisement. In the story, the ads never happen, and as I recall he never really planned on doing it anyway.

    Unfortunately, I suspect we will see ads in the sky soon. Unless, of course, light pollution in urban skies makes such schemes economically unsound. Who knew? Those of us in the country may finally have a reason to be glad that you can't see the night sky in the cities anyway.

    Steven

    1. Re:Heinlein Had The Idea First by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      I wonder how expensive it would be to put a nice, fine coating of carbon on 20% or so of the lunar surface?

      I imagine a notice on the far side reading:

      "Visitors must register at the UN Port of Entry in New York immediately upon arrival."

  125. Coming Soon by fdiskne1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Turn your Little Dipper into a Big Dipper.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
  126. Disguise the Limit by eshuy · · Score: 1
    Another possible future for space advertising is given in:

    Disguise the Limit

    Extract: "Old Loony plans to make like a Greek and build Celestial Spheres around the Earth with stars painted on them and the moon projected onto the inner sphere by a laser spotlight! And you stand there, nodding your head as if this were a perfectly sane ambition! Then you tell me he wants this done because he thinks the universe as it stands is 'aesthetically displeasing'. This from a man with the aesthetic sense of a flame-thrower. He's mad, Mike, and you're mad to go along with him. The environmental lobby for one would sooner eat whale than let us build these spheres."

  127. Time's running out by davew2040 · · Score: 1

    Somebody kill this guy in a horrible way before anyone with money gets any ideas!!

  128. anyone catch tripping the rift on sci-fi? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    granted it's a sci-fi cgi cartoon... but if advertising in space was done anything like it is on the show... I wouldn't be surprised to see floating billboards with holographic/moving picture adverts...

    Well I'd be surprised, because it won't be in my lifetime... but I digress..

    *shrug*

    e,

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  129. i hope this guy... by spamspam · · Score: 0

    ...has his pubic region invested by the fleas of a thousand camels.

  130. Nerds do by Frag+Rind · · Score: 1

    Stars are wonderful examples of not only fusion, but photon production, chemistry, atomic structure, light in general, and many more advanced science topics. Nerds are into science, and thus most of us look at the night sky to ponder stars, the universe, "extra-terrestrial" life, and to some extent, even philosophy, on a relatively frequent basis.

  131. airvertising: bladerunner here we come.... by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    And so begins the era of billboards in our airspace....airvertising all around in the next 5-10 years..bladerunner here we come

  132. Futurama here we come by motorsabbath · · Score: 1

    Humans really do suck. I mean, really. We are a scourge upon this
    galaxy...

    --
    The heat from below can burn your eyes out
  133. this would be fantastic by sbma44 · · Score: 1
    Can you imagine what would happen when the first space advertisement is launched?

    I can't, but whatever it is, it would immediately need to be put next to the entry for "backlash" in the dictionary. You can bet the thing would be torn down asap. But I suspect that such an event couldn't help but spur a conversation on the extent to which advertising saturates our society -- it might even lead to the tide of logos receding, just a bit (and for just a little while).

  134. It's mine too! by Frag+Rind · · Score: 1

    I agree with everything you said except for three words, "my own sanctuary". The sky is a sanctuary, as you described it, for thousands of people. And I believe, knock on wood, that if this idea were to get to the point at which it would begin to look realistic, we could get a petition started and signed with enough names that companies wouldn't take part in it.

  135. If I'd have thought of it.... by phorm · · Score: 1

    I would have patented ads in space. Heck, we should patent anything that looks like it could be used for more annoying advertisements...

    Reason? You don't need to *use* the patented item yourself, but it's very useful in making somebody else stop...

    When company X says "We're thinking of burning an ad into the face of the moon with a laser, everybody will know about us then," you might have a valid retort...

  136. TO HELL WITH THAT! by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    "black and boring?"

    Have you ever SEEN a clear night sky, outside of some light-polluted city or suburb?

    The awe and beauty of the night sky gets washed out by crappy advertising and you tell us "you'll get used to it."

    "The walls of the Grand Canyon were so dull and stone-colored. Now these billboards for s%$tburgers and cheap hotels make it so colorful and exciting!"

    "This unspoiled meadow was so boring. It's SO much livlier now that it's littered with colorful flyers from local chiropractors and 10 minute oil change places!"

    Screw That. F$#k that noise.

    Stefan

  137. MPAA by gcore · · Score: 1

    Tought it looked funny when i looked in my telescope this morning...

    "Piracy - also illegal in zero G! MPAA"

  138. That's nothin by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    And in other news, I've patented the idea of advertising on the inside of your eyelids. Now the trick is to get the government to force people to have my procedure done to everyone...

  139. Great by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

    If this is the future of advertising, then in the future you won't be able to look in any direction without seeing some kind of commercial (in some places that's already true). You could close your eyes of course, but then they would probably invent some technique to induce these images directly in your visual cortex...

  140. Killer Satelite Bait? by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Suddenly I'm feeling a little more in favor of us putting weapons in Space. I can just see it now... "Natural Male Enahc.... BOOOM!!!" YEA BABY!

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  141. Re:Aren't you actually required to have a prototyp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading some story that had stars rearranged to form an advertisement for coke actually. I don't remember which story though, which is rather unfortunate.

  142. Pop up adds in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the massive amounts of pollution made by these companies will haze this out.

  143. It already exists by GerritHoll · · Score: 1

    Probably the whole moon is an advertisement. They want to sell spacecraft, you know.

    1. Re:It already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use nuclear missiles to carve the whole moon into the shape of an ass so as to permanently Moon the Earth. Get it - *Moon* the Earth. Huh Huh Huh.

  144. Firefly by 241comp · · Score: 1

    Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me. Oh, wait a minute...

  145. Not a novel idea by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    This patent will never hold water. The idea is an old one. Proposals like this appear from time to time, and are promptly shot down by the horrified masses. I wish the patent would survive, however, because it will be a deterrent to anyone wanting to do this. Though one has to wonder how a patent will really stop someone from starting a space advertising company on, say, the Cocos Islands and floating messages over the rest of the patented world?

  146. Light polution by mcheu · · Score: 1

    "People would be able to see writing in the skies from the Earth no worse than they see the stars,"
    (Quote from the inventor, as given in the original article)

    Kind of makes the whole concept pretty useless as an advertising delivery vehicle. As it is now, with all the light polution around urban centres, people in the cities and suburbs can't even see the stars at night. If the quote is true, doesn't that mean that the ads will only be visible in rural and unsettled areas? The only living things that will see the big orbiting coke can are going to be cows and caribou.

  147. Also Clarke by raj1v · · Score: 1

    There's also a Clarke short story (maybe Venture to the Moon?) that mentions an advertisement on the moon. I think it was using an experiment that sent a cloud of sulphur into the moon's 'atmosphere'

  148. Not just Futurama, Was:As if there weren't alre... by ampersandTHORN · · Score: 1
    Red Dwarf (the book) went one worse...

    "For anyone living on Earth the result would be mind-fizzingly spectacular. One hundred and twenty-eight stars would appear to go supernova simultaneously, burning with such ferocity they would be visible even in daylight.

    "And the 128 supernovae would spell out a message.

    "And this would be the message:

    "'COKE ADDS LIFE!'"

  149. Light Pollution is a problem already by penultimatepost · · Score: 1
    This may be offtopic but I believe is related. I live in the norhteastern US, and as others have already pointed out,due to light pollution, can only see a fraction of the stars that would otherwise be visible during a clear night.

    I grew up in Colombia and remember fondly countless nights spent in awe looking up at the stars; imagining, wondering.

    There are people out there working hard making sure that lawmakers, corporationes, etc, are made aware that for the most part, economic development and dark skies, don't neccessarily have to be at odds; that with a few careful measures, a significant amount of light pollution can be avoided.

    For more info, a useful site is

    DarkSky.org

  150. Launch that cosmonaut by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Ok we need to launch that scientist and his idea right to the sun. Ugh "Hey son, lets go look at the pretty stars, hmm a budweiser add. Ok son, enough of that. Lets try and sleep. Oh wait the sky is filled with ads, now there is no darkness!" -Avi P.S. I am feeling a strong case of Highlander 2 coming about

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  151. Space trash by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ok, so we all know that trash in space is going to be a growing problem as we continue to reach out to the stars. Will we be able to get laws in place saying you can't litter, and this is considered littering? Or once we've got tons of space stations and every day space travel, is advertising in space going to just become as common as billboards while you drive?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  152. Enlightenment by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

    I suddenly see the need for Bush's space-based weapons systems!

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  153. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can shut off the radio, choose not to watch TV, or go to web sites with banner ads, and choose to avoid magazines and newspapers, but it is THE sky they are talking about vandalizing. Even if the grafitti changes, it's still grafitti. And you can't escape it. You will see porno-spam and Ciggarette ads in the frikken sky! The one and only sky there is to look up into for chrissakes!

  154. Exploitation? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I always thought isreal would start putting advertising on that giant wall it built to cut palestine in half - i could just imagine the coke logo running along it.

    Advertising is basically graffiti except someone paid for it, corporate greed makes me sick.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  155. Cruise Missles by Holi · · Score: 1

    Ahh time to stock up on a variety of cruise missles and ICBM's, that way I can take em down faster then they put them up.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  156. Ads on a clear summer's night sky by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    while I'm on a wide open prairie field, trying to teach my children the constellations?

    I for one want to tell our new night-sky advertisers to fuck the hell off.

  157. I can see the advertisement now: by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    l33t h4x0r w45 h3r3!!!!!!

    1. Re:I can see the advertisement now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's bad, how about an ASCII of goatse?

    2. Re:I can see the advertisement now: by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      That would be awesome. Maybe that hacker would be kind enough to load a goatse photo onto it...
      Little Girl >> "Mommy, what's that man doing to his poo poo?"
      Mother >> "What man... OH MY @$%!#%!@$&%!@$!"

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  158. Re:Prior Art: I know, RTFA (Impracticality?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone keeps bringing up coke but no one has mentioned "Coke adds life".from the scifi series, red dwarf. Coke causes a hundred carefully timed supernova all over the galaxy so that all the light arrives on the same time and says "Coke adds Life" in the sky day or night for a few weeks.

  159. I'd have to boycott by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    anyone who would tarnish my view of the night sky. I like to go backpacking and hunting. One of the best parts of a trip is looking up at the stars and seeing the galaxy without interference from city light pollution. Stretch a big banner add across that view and I will be pissed. If it were cheap enough to be worthwhile for advertisers, then it would be just as cheap (or cheaper) to launch a small missile to blow the add out of the sky.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  160. Don't like ads in space? Live here... by HomerJayS · · Score: 1

    Try one of these locations to live if you don't like ads in the sky.

    http://uk.dk.com/static/cs/uk/11/features/russel la sh/intro.html

  161. Re:GORILLA PENIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow 1.5" huh...that's at least three times as long as yours though.

  162. Spike and Faye were onto something... by australopithecus · · Score: 1

    This news makes Cowboy Bebop seem all the more realistic.

  163. Hate to break it to you... by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But these products are heavily advertised too.

    There's a lucrative living to be made in business-to-business advertising. Billions of dollars are spent every year on telemarketing, direct mail, and trade shows to sell products that aren't directly consumer-advertised products.

    Generic brands fit into this, too. Generic-brand companies compete for corporate agreements with supermarkets to sell their own 'no name' cereals, cookies, baking goods, etc. *Many* dollars are spent send reps to the four corners of the earth with samples, literature, anything they can do to market directly to the store in question.

    Don't think for a second that advertising costs are any lower, or margins are any higher, just because it's generic. Usually the only thing different is that the production cost of the item is lower; it's just unnecessary to market a name to the consumer, because the ones buying generic are just looking for the lowest cost item that isn't completely indigestable.

    Don't kid yourself; *every* consumer product is advertised/marketed in some form.

  164. You see, by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
    This is precisely the reason why civillians should have access to intercontinental Ballistic Missiles.

    "What the hell's that Pepsi ad doing in my skyline?" (Takes aim, presses the big red button. Moments later, the Pepsi sign shatters to a million pieces) "Ah, that's more like it."

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  165. Well, in that case... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    I think it would be time for some Civil Disobedience. Perhaps this very scenario was what Thoreau was envisioning! ;)

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  166. Re:Aren't you actually required to have a prototyp by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

    A Red Dwarf book possibly? Certainly that was the mission of the Nova 5 (Kryten's original ship).

  167. Wow! by Blublu · · Score: 1

    I want to enable this to use blinkenlights, then play Space Invaders on this!

    --
    meh
  168. Crack starwars by holizz · · Score: 1

    And we can see shooting spam as the spamellites hurtle to Earth.

  169. Jurisdiction for patent? by dmeranda · · Score: 1

    Patent law, like all laws of mankind, have a jurisdiction within which they are enforceable, usually the borders of a nation. Who's patent laws extend their jusidiction to space?

    Now if you painted an advert on the rocket while on the ground you could be at risk, but what if the construction of the advert happened once you were in space?

  170. Re:Aren't you actually required to have a prototyp by lommer · · Score: 1

    nope, a prototype isn't needed in american patent law. This is how things like perpetual motion machines get patented (true story, do some googling).

  171. This idea blows the space ads out of the water. by rahijada · · Score: 1

    I don't own the patents to any of this technology, but what about using Hypersonic Sound transmitters to transmit audio ads directly to our ears. This could be done using GPS to direct exactly where the beams should go. The GPS tracking system could then use RFID to derive not only location, but demographic information, preferences, and such to direct target advertising to individuals. Hows that sound?

    --
    Make something ID10T proof, you'll make a better ID10T.
  172. Space Trash by Plocmstart · · Score: 1
    "Daddy what's that?"
    "Oh it's the Skoal Big Dipper! At one time back before space ads it was just called the big dipper though."
    "Where's the Long John Silvers Pisces? That one's my favorite!"

    If someone can put advertising garbage satellites in space I'll pay money for someone to develop a spaceship to go up there and shoot them down, or maybe just rearrange them, then shoot them down later.

    Reminds me of "Cowboy Bebop" with all the space ads in that show.

  173. Pop-up blocker? by Dr+Rick · · Score: 1

    Finally, a use for all of those old ICBMs! Rick

    --

    Dr. Rick
    - "It's such a fine line between clever and stupid" (Nigel Tufnel)
    - Zort! (Pinky)
  174. Consider the silver lining... by mpthompson · · Score: 1

    "People would be able to see writing in the skies from the Earth no worse than they see the stars," he said.

    Considering how bad light pollution is in most urban areas, it's tough to see all but the very brightest stars on any given clear night. Perhaps the silver lining to this absurd idea is that space advertisers would work to reduce light pollution caused by regular outdoor advertising so the majority of the population could actually see their ads in space.

    Just a thought...

  175. Re:Prior Art: I know, RTFA (Impracticality?) by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

    By no means is the thrust considerable. However, if oriented properly, the thrust is consistent, which makes it highly useful as a solar sail.

    --
    Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
  176. Re:Not just Futurama, Was:As if there weren't alre by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

    If only I had not already used up my mod points... Will the Brits please create some more Red Dwarf episodes/movies--and no using American actors/directors/producers. As an American I see enough of that humor, I want my Red Dwarf done correctly thank you.

    --
    Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
  177. Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the patent on some annoying, intrusive advertising method that will be possible in the future.

    Announce that you will licence it for $100 Billion.

    Earn the praise and grattitude of people who thank you for preventing the annoying, intrusive advertising.

  178. Pop-up ads - end of the world by jCard · · Score: 1

    I can just see the Martian headlines now... Earth destroyed by asteroid hidden behind the space ad. I am sure that earth based astronomers just love this invention...

  179. Actual Prior Art: I know, fictional... by freeBill · · Score: 1

    ...In Shepherd Mead's hysterical novel, "The Big Ball of Wax," this idea was not only predicted, but the constellation "Pepsi" was described.

    Mead's experience on Madison Avenue showed in his expectation that such advertising would remain long after its utility was gone. His main character noticed the dot over the i in the constellation "Pepsi" had moved out of place and had been over the "s" for so long no one even paid attention.

    This book, which has been very hard to get for years, is a delightful sendup of the advertising culture. I consider it to be much better than Mead's better-known parody of business-advice books, "How to Succeed in Business without Really Trying." While considered racy in its day, it probably wouldn't raise any eyebrows today if you created a Saturday-morning cartoon based on it.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  180. Prior art by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

    Probably nobody will notice this post but if you want to look for prior art there was a comic book where the villain's goal was to put advertisement on the moon.

    He used hypnotised henchmen talking drawkcab (backward, that is) which led to a slight problem

    .

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  181. That's OK, U.S. "owns space" now anyway... by MMHere · · Score: 1
    According to Noam Chomsky in this link, the Bush administration has switched its security strategy regarding space from control to ownership of space.

    So all those popups will have to pay the U.S. to have their "billboards on our land."

  182. Here's some more prior art -- "space billboards" by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't give much information about the specific technique which is probably what matters in the case of patents, although it does at least say the following:

    He said the satellites would be visible in the night sky by employing sunlight reflectors, with multiple satellites linked together to create a message large enough to be seen.

    There are some clear similarities, at least, in the form of ideas and business intentions, from over a decade ago. If nowhere else, it's documented in a couple of International Dark Sky Association Information Sheets that are campaigning against a former company's ideas to put giant billboards into orbit in association with, among other things, the 1996 Atlanta Olympics. See Space Billboards Threaten Night Sky and Grass Root Opposition to Space Billboards.

    Neither article is dated on the site, although references in the text of them dates back to some time around 1993. The IDA would likely have records of the original publication date and the events in question.

    As a side note, the idea of putting advertising in Earth orbit like this tends to sicken me. I really hope that nobody goes for it.

  183. ALDI ... by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    ALDI is a german based grocery discounter.

    While ALDI has some ads today, it has extremly few. And they hadnt at all in the beginning.
    They just advertise their special sales every week in a normal newspaper ad.
    That's it.

    No TV ads, no billboards, no radio spots, no sponsoring.

    They aim to have good quality and low prices.
    EVERTHING else is secondary.

    Shop decoration? Shop mobilar? Product choice? More than two cash registers? Electronic scanners? Credit cards accepted? Air miles? Consumer counseling?
    Forget it all.
    An ALDI store is two manual cash registers and ~600 different products (40000 is normal in the industry) to choose from that are mostly still in the boxes the fabricant packed them into.

    They therefor break almost all rules of marketing.

    Now look at the Forbes list of the worlds richest people for the two owners, Karl & Theo Albrecht.
    You dont have to look far ... Karl is number 3, Theo number 14.

    So refusing to advertise in order to get lower prices CAN work, it can even work EXTREMLY well. At least for stores that have a local consumer base and can use mouth-to-mouth propaganda.

    Besides, more generally, restaurant dont advertise either. And I'm hell sure NOT to go to the few that do, as I know I will pay for the ads. A good restaurant doesnt need ads, they already get them for free from guides, so a restaurant that does advertise is most likely mediocre or worse.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  184. Try Public Radio/TV for a change of pace. by laupark · · Score: 0

    But there is a choice, public radio and puclic television. They ask you directly for money in annoying (but predictable) blocks of time that is easily tuned out. Plus, all of the rich people can -rockefeller endowment, etc. can feel good that they provide a public 'service' by donating. Of course your local intellectual elitist donate $50 every now and then too as they drink overpriced coffee (pinky extended). Public TV/Radio is a viable choice.

    1. Re:Try Public Radio/TV for a change of pace. by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      While you do have a good point, I don't like the way you describe people who donate are either UBER-RICH people (most of the people I know are not) and local intellectual elitist (some of them I know who donate doesn't work in jobs for the intellectually elite), while a majority of the funding do come from rich and intellectual elitists (what wrong with being smart? Aren't nerds just another form of intellectual elites, both smart people? Except that we the nerds are more socially inept then they are), some people actually donate because they believe earnestly its for a good cause.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:Try Public Radio/TV for a change of pace. by laupark · · Score: 0

      You're right, I happen to listen to NPR and watch PBS and as you can tell from my post am neither intellectual or elite. I rarely talk about it to friends. (Now I must be an elitist, because I think my way of contributing is superior! Dohh!) There are a good many people I know that 'think' they are geniuses make sure they let everyone know they support Public Radio. I would have to qualify or restate my previous post as most donations probably are small and add up to the majority of funds contributed (pure speculation, but likely). But as usual, the vocal minority (Exceedingly rich, or annoyingly intellectual) are what many people picture when public radio donors are mentioned. It seems we do agree that Public Media is a Good thing, regardless of the hang-ups some people (me) have about the percieved, prototypical donors.

  185. Obligatory Fight Club Quote. by UseTheSource · · Score: 1

    "When deep space exploration ramps up, it will be the corporations that name everything: the IBM Stellar Sphere, the Microsoft Gallery, the planet Starbucks."

    --
    "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
    "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    1. Re:Obligatory Fight Club Quote. by UseTheSource · · Score: 1

      Oops... Err... Microsoft Galaxy, that is. To this, the book version adds, "Every planet will take on the corporate identity of whoever rapes it first."

      --
      "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
      "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    2. Re:Obligatory Fight Club Quote. by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the world's oil supply will run out and industrial civilization will collapse before we can reach that point. Wheee! Everybody dies!

  186. Prior Art by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this concept already shown in a Dilbert animation a few years back, where he tried to launch an advertisement into space and ended up knocking all of the world's sattelites out of alignment and sending Earth back to the dark ages?

  187. what about the night sky? by illumina+us · · Score: 1

    I live in a small city and the lights from the city alone are too much to obscure the beautiful view of the night sky. I certainly do not want to see Pepsi, Apple, or Microsoft ads when I go to gaze at the stars.

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
  188. Can't resist... by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

    Having read most comment posted, I couldn't resist replying so everyone can read this. If the satellite is ever deployed, and controlled by a remote signal... and is hackable (I bet someone will find a way to do it), I plead to those who are capable that when the time comes, put the goatse image on it... So situations such as follow might happen.

    Little Girl >> "Mommy, what's that man doing to his poo poo hole?"
    Mother >> "What man... OH MY &@!%$&%!&@#$&%!@%#$!"

    Astronomer 1 >> "Check this out, I think we just found a super massive black hole."
    Astronomer 2 >> "Let me see... all I see are a bunch of black thing."
    Astronomer 1 >> "Let's zoom out a little..."
    Astronomer 1&2 >> "HOLY F***!"

    The man featured in goatse >> "Hey! That's my ass up there."

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  189. Lavrynov Seems To Be Lying About Having a Patent by ipandithurts · · Score: 2, Insightful
    After searching the United States Patent Office database and the European Patent Office database I failed to find any patent by an inventor of the name Lavrynov.

    It is possible that he filed a registration patent in Russia. However a registration patent is filed essentially as a copyright would be, when you file what amounts to be an invention disclosure. This simply provide one "proof" that the purported "invention" existes as of the date filed.

    If one wishes to "enforce" a registration patent, one must prove in court, during litigation, that the registration should be accorded legal rights.

    It's unfortunate that news sources don't take the time to research stuff like this.

    --

    Stop undressing me with your eyes. I'm ugly naked.
  190. Re:Prior Art: I know, RTFA (Impracticality?) by arivanov · · Score: 1

    In order for it to be visible it will have to exceed the size of most solar sail projects by an order of magnitude. At that size the thrust will become considerable (besides being consistent).

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  191. How's this for On-Topic... by MotherInferior · · Score: 1

    Bush is a weenie totalitarian incompetent scumbag dictator fascist mastermind of terror around the world. I would like nothing better than to see the United State of America get its ass kicked by Osama bin Laden, Al Quaeda and the palistenians.

    Furthermore, Republicans are fascists, Margaret Thatcher is a dirty whore, Reagan is animatronic ductwork, and Noam Chomsky is God incarnate (or a reasonable facsimile thereof). Right-wing fundies are bigots and homophobes and smell like onions. Conservatives strangle children in their spare time and just aren't, under any circumstance whatsoever, cool.

    I think it's time to send all non-centrist, closed-minded people to a hell of their choosing. Too many people think it's "ok" to not be tolerant and open-minded. That's just not acceptable. We need to silence those people, with tanks if possible.

    Just my $0.02.

    IMHO.

    You'll probably think I'm a Troll...

    I'm just not sure...

    LOL WTF!!!111one

    Did I mention my opinion was humble? Cuz it is. That's why I'm broadcasting it to everyone on Slashdot. Cuz it's humble and stuff. Really, I'm open-minded. Please?