Slashdot Mirror


CDs May be Less Immortal than We Thought

Zordak writes "The near-immortality of CDs, sometimes used as an excuse by record companies as an argument for their high cost, may not be as eternal as touted. An article at CNN describes the problem of CD Rot rearing its head to deny you access to your music and data. The article also describes related problems with CD-Rs, CD-RWs and DVDs."

504 comments

  1. old news by simcop2387 · · Score: 5, Informative

    cd rot has been known about for years, there's been other /. articles about it

    1. Re:old news by slickwillie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I think there was one a week or two ago. Let me get out my Slashdot Archive CD and check.

      Doh! Nothing there.

    2. Re:old news by packeteer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only is it known about but there are ways around it. You can buy special archiving cd's that last much longer. Look for "gold" cd's to last longer. The problem is that organic ink just wont last forever but that doesn't mean you hafta use discs that die quickly.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:old news by simcop2387 · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:old news by Phillup · · Score: 1

      And... there was an article in the print version of my local paper about it this morning. (Under "More Headlines")

      If you can't get the news to me faster than my newspaper...

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    5. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole!

      Are you the model used for goats.ex?

    6. Re:old news by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      "gold" the ad-mans dream word.

    7. Re:old news by jamonterrell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this is about the 8th time this has been posted on slashdot. seems like the editors should be required to at least read /.

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    8. Re:old news by GeekZilla · · Score: 1

      You mean there is someone else in Spokane who reads Slashdot? Sweet! I thought I was the only one.

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
    9. Re:old news by gujo-odori · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read a variety of news sites, you'll see that /. is never first with the news, and not often even fast with the news. It's not unusual to see something here that I first read weeks ago elsewhere.

      That's unavoidable, because /. is not a news reporting site, it's an aggragating site for news that was first reported elsewhere. The value of /. is not in being first with the news; the value of /. is in gathering a lot of news in one place for the convenience of trolls ;-)

    10. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot my password.
      Thanks a lot, asshole.

    11. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I forgot my password too. Luckily /. lets me back in by using the "This Link" in my Bookmarks. One of these days I'll have them reset it...

      --
      Everyone already knows this is offtopic, but I'm posting anon.
      Go mod someone else up instead of wasting a point to mod me down.

    12. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      editors should be required to at least read /.

      You make a pretty bold assumption about their abilities before you even get to the "/." part.

    13. Re:old news by Erratio · · Score: 4, Funny

      And all this time I thought they were creating links to other sites before the pages were actually created.

      --
      I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
    14. Re:old news by JPriest · · Score: 2, Funny

      And with a name like GeekZilla you could probably use a friend. Phillup, will you be GeekZilla friend?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    15. Re:old news by Dever · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I know gold cd's are supposed to last longer, since they're the reflective layer and don't oxidize like aluminum (i think it's alum) layered cd's...

      BUT...i'm wondering, and i am admittedly ignorant about the potential for this working...could there be a way to ditch the reflective layer entirely and just have a tracking read 'head' above the cd? it would seem to me that instead of reading the reflected spaces of something/not-something you could just read them by seeing what was passing through to the other side of the disc...???

      i'm sure no **IA wouldn't let any technology that let us read media forever (or more than 2-6 years) become a standard though...

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    16. Re:old news by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I don't have to worry about CD rot, my CD-R's never last much longer than a month on my car anyway. Lucky for me I have all my stuff backed up the my PC. If my PC dies, then they are backed up the the internet :)

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    17. Re:old news by rocketjam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Long thread on this at Macintouch here back in 2000.

    18. Re:old news by name773 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a way to ditch the reflective layer entirely and just have a tracking read 'head' above the cd? it would seem to me that instead of reading the reflected spaces of something/not-something you could just read them by seeing what was passing through to the other side of the disc...???
      but then you've got a more complex system with stuff to move on both sides, bigger device, etc. however, do a google search for magneto-optical media, it's used in minidiscs and it uses magnets to read/write info, and a laser fires at the optical part that heats up the magnet on the other side of the media to where it can be written to. under that temp, the magnet can't be changed. lifetime warranty on all discs

    19. Re:old news by unitron · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you're saying that Slashdot is the geek's Reader's Digest?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    20. Re:old news by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      That's a fair description, I think. Reader's Digest carries a small amount of original content, and so does Slashdot (book reviews, that sort of thing), and anyone who reads a lot has probably seen much of it elsewhere.

      I wonder if Reader's Digest has trolls?

    21. Re:old news by LqqkOut · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wow, the discovery of CD rot and IRC! Both in the same day. What's next?

      "IP Addresses Hold Hidden Meanings"
      "Weatherbug is a Scam"
      "Email, It's not Just for Fwd'ing Memes"
      "All Your Base Are Belong To Us!"

      --

      -- In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!

    22. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're bored of cd rot try this on:
      concrete is moist glue
      that rots into a fine powder
      tick tock goes the clock

      nobody knows the real shelf life but we know it is far less than was previously claimed. it hasnt been around for long enough! it costs far more money than the politicians are willing to divert away from the war coffers to redo the job properly so its really a matter of time until stuff starts breaking horribly. just like cds!

      i know some of you eggheads will laugh, but its true.

      love!

    23. Re:old news by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      It's pretty sad... Two weeks ago there was another article. On that article I posted words to effect of "Every few weeks Slashdot runs another article about how awful CD's are for lasting backups of data"... And here we again.

      As I said back then, when CD's started to reach mainstream, there were stories like this. One I remember is how the ink used to print on CD's would eat through the disk in 7 years...

      Yes, this is why the albums I bought in 1989, one of which was printed in 1987, are still just fine.

      It's all bullshit.

    24. Re:old news by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's only been about 8 times?

    25. Re:old news by Rodrin · · Score: 1

      Read? Are you sure, I thought they were only good for posting articles...hmm. Now wasn't I mistaken?

    26. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Lord, how much misinformation can you stuff into one post? Magnets don't read or write the info, an ELECTROMAGNET is used to WRITE data on the LAYER. The LAYER is heated by a laser. The laser doesn't heat the magnet, what would that achieve?

    27. Re:old news by GeekZilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? No. I have lots of friends. Why, there's my friend...uh Gee. Yeah, Good Old Gee Fore! And sure, then there's my uh..friend Petey A. Lots of fun with him! He goes everywhere I go. And let's not forget my uh...other friend..um..yeah...his name is...uh...H. P. Laaptop. See? I have lots of "friends"!

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
    28. Re:old news by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      And then theres also someone from Coeur d'Alene =).

    29. Re:old news by isopossu · · Score: 1
      In every advance of storage technology the capacity grows. We've seen how people record their old vinyl records, c-cassettes and even CD:s to mp3:s or ogg:s and store them to their hard disks.

      I believe that before the CD rot or any kind of physical deterioration of digital material begins to have any kind of real effect, practically all the relevant data is transferred to newer storage technologies.

      The reason to transfer would be the usability, reliability, mobility or saving the physical space (for example a record collection vs. laptop hard disk).

    30. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im sorry the others called you an Asshole. Thats the funniest thing Ive seen in ages; simple, to the point, brilliant. I would love to know how many people around the world lost their passwords. Thanks for making me laugh. Note to rest : Dont call people assholes just cos youre to stupid to check links on slashdot.

    31. Re:old news by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      The article from 2 weeks ago was mainly focused on CD-R, while this article mentions CD-rot in commercialy produced CD's. So it's not only the free pirated copy of MS-Office that can rot, but also the original copy you bought for $500 (... yeah... right...)

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    32. Re:old news by eschasi · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Read the frigging article, OK? It's about commercially produced pressed CDs, not recordable. The reference you cite is about recordables. I could be wrong, but I don't ever recall seeing something about the commercial CDs decaying in this manner.

    33. Re:old news by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

      All of them stated that both CDRs, RWs, AND commercially duplicated CDs were affected.

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    34. Re:old news by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      /. is not about journalism and breaking stories. Its about /.'ers refining their ideas about these stories - coming to new insights (and as a result rehashing alot of previous drivel in the process).

      For each diamond of insight gleaned from slashdot, there are many tons worth of bovine scatology spread.

      That is the nature of the beast. Accept it, or not. Its your ulcer...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    35. Re:old news by Cornelius+Chesterfie · · Score: 1

      "this is about the 8th time this has been posted on slashdot. seems like the editors should be required to at least read /."

      Vous etes nouveau ici n'est-ce pas?

    36. Re:old news by flyneye · · Score: 1

      maybe we should throw rotten cds at them till they pull it offstage with a crook.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    37. Re:old news by object88 · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. :)

      Yes, in fact, there was. It has been known since the mid 90s, at least, that poorly produced pressed CDs have been subject to an untimely demise.

      With regard to CDs, this isn't new news, but it is worth alerting people to every few years or so, to make sure the new folks are fully informed.

      With regard to DVDs, I don't personally recall this making the news before, but I'm likely to have missed it. (Another good reason to bring it up every few years or so.)

    38. Re:old news by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Great news! I just found out about a great new thing, I think all slashdotters should know about it. Well, this thing is called Internet, and I can assure you, it's really great!
      What? You already know about it? Well ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    39. Re:old news by unitron · · Score: 1
      "I wonder if Reader's Digest has trolls?"

      We prefer to call our senior citizen subscribers a "target demographic".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    40. Re:old news by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's all scaremongering. The idiots who own the disks that rotted probably store them in the sink or something. I know people who have had CD's fail. It was because they're slobs who don't store them properly. I mean there's care instructions with the damn things for a reason.

      Still, funny to think CD was pimped, what, 25 years ago now, as an indestructible format. I'll never forget this "audio CD's never skip" nonsense put to rest when in 1983, a store was demoing using a Pointer Sisters album I think it was that was playing the same second of song over and over and over... What was more amusing was the fact that people at the store just left it doing that for about 45 minutes.

    41. Re:old news by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

      no, I'm not.

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    42. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there's me, who just left that area and rejoiced about it.

  2. iTunes doesn't rot by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While it might suck having to pay a nickel for music off of iTunes, at least I know that my data can be backed up in a manner of my own choosing.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought iTunes songs were $1 a pop.

    2. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can't make a backup in a manner of your own choosing with a CD?

    3. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by pr0c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ObviousGuy: While it might suck having to pay a nickel for music off of iTunes, at least I know that my data can be backed up in a manner of my own choosing.

      Not without circumventing the system such as burning those protected files to cd then converting them (ooop still a cd issue). Or illegally ripping the protection from them which is possible but a PITA. Last I checked it was much easier (and yes more expensive) to buy CDs and then to back them up ANY way you saw fit, in that respect a CD beats iTunes hands down not to mention the quality.

    4. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "While it might suck having to pay a nickel for music off of iTunes, at least I know that my data can be backed up in a manner of my own choosing."

      Because there's just no way to get the data off an audio CD you buy at the mall.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by jrockway · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Illegally ripping protection? Illegal? An example of an illegal act is murder. Violating an EULA is not illegal.

      Sorry, wording like that pisses me off. It's not a crime to rape/murder* YOUR files. (Maybe breach of contract, but if they want to sue me over a $0.99 song, then whatever.)

      * This is the RIAA's new term for listening to music. Additionally, it refers to stripping the DRM out of a file. (How is playing a file to another file any different than playing it to a speaker?)

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by pr0c · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IANAL but I do believe this fits into the DMC. Violation of the DMC is ILLEGAL... if you disagree with that... welcome to the club, write your congress person.

    7. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      I back up my laptop to a server, which then gets backed up to tape. My music collection goes with it. This does not circumvent any copy-protection scheme that I agreed to with apple.

      Quality is a different matter. We have SCAD or DVD-Audio for that.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    8. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by pr0c · · Score: 1

      Yes true, I was thinking more along the lines of being able to change formats or play some other way and this isn't the case... my mistake. Been a long day

    9. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, it's possible to take an .aac file and copy it to whatever medium you like. No public, common hard disk driver enforces DRM. You won't be able to play the files on multiple machines, granted, but you will have the data. If that fails, you can back up the whole hard drive, which has the benefit of backing up the iTunes copy that unlocked the file.

      Hmm...can someone who uses iTunes tell me if it's possible to make multiple bit-level copies of the .aac file so that each machine you move it on to thinks it's only the 2nd one?

    10. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assuming that any given EULA is valid, (a big jump, but follow along with me here) violation of it is either breach of contract or copyright violation. Both of those things are torts, are against the law, and conceivably will land you in civil court. In civil court the worst they can do is take your money.

      I think you are confusing the word illegal with criminal. Words mean things, and illegal means "against the law." The important difference is that crimes land you in a criminal trial, where they can take your freedom.

      Breach of contract may not be criminal, but is illegal. In most cases, copyright infringement is not a crime, but a tort, and still illegal.

    11. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      It would be very bad if we constantly had to re-archive everything because the medium or the tech won't last or becomes obsolete where, even if the disk doesn't rot, you won't find a machine that can read it. It should be obvious to anyone who knows anything about plastics that this would happen. The plastic will eventually craze, or the unprotected(!) aluminum will corrode. The only kind of CD that possibly could last for a long time would have to be made of glass and gold. Then there's still the question about the player. The only medium that still has lasting power is stone, paper, (scissors?)...no, and good old vinyl. Plus, you don't need any fancy tech to use it. Hell, you don't even need electricity. So, even if we were to be bombed back into the stone age, I could still wrap a paper cone around a straight pin and listen to my old Led Zeppelin records. Pottery wheels make good turntables. :-)

      --
      What?
    12. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      It would be very bad if we constantly had to re-archive everything

      I don't see why this is intrinsically so bad ... or at least why it's any worse than having keep track of your "permament" archive material.
    13. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      While it might suck having to pay a nickel for music off of iTunes

      Too bad iTunes is 20 nickels for music.

    14. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Well, because it would require maintenance over many generations, and time goes buy, stuff would get lost or forgotten. Also, eventually,the data would suffer damage along the way, especially if it had to be translated to the current language. The bible is a good example. I have no idea how well the King James version matches the original sanscrit.

      --
      What?
    15. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      That is the worst argument I've ever heard in my life.

      the DMCA makes it a crime to break copy protection. you might not like it, and you may think it is a lesser crime than murder (like most sane people would) but the fact that murder is a greater crime does not make a lesser crime not a crime.

      If you were to physically steal 99c from someone, it would be a crime, even though it is far less a crime than murder.

      Note, I'm not trying to state a view as to whether or not copying music is a crime, only that it is possible for petty crimes to exist.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    16. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by geekee · · Score: 1

      "While it might suck having to pay a nickel for music off of iTunes, at least I know that my data can be backed up in a manner of my own choosing."

      Aside from the moronic copy protection schemes of a minority of cd's, most can be backed up as well. Plus, since there is no encryption on cd's, there are no limits to the backup process.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    17. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by fdobbie · · Score: 1

      You can take a .m4p and copy it to any media you like. However, if you try to play it on any new computer you will need to authorise that computer first.

    18. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by golgotha007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No public, common hard disk driver enforces DRM. You won't be able to play the files on multiple machines, granted,

      know what? fuck that. plain and simple.

      when i buy a book at the bookstore, i don't need some secret decoder eye-ring to read the damn thing. if i did, than this limits my being able to fairly use my purchased book in whatever manner i choose.

      when i buy something, i buy the damn thing. when i rent, then i rent it.
      don't tell me that i'm buying something when i'm actually renting it.

      more and more offshore mp3 websites with awesome collections are sprouting up offering songs for as little as 2 cents a song.

      sure i can sit here and say that i'm cheating the artists by illegally purchasing music online, but let's get the facts straight: in most cases, artists don't benefit from CD sales other than making their contract look good. i'm tired of handing my money over to the RIAA everytime i buy a CD.

      do away with the RIAA, let the artists benefit 100 percent from music sales, and i'll go back to legally purchasing music again.

    19. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by ThePiMan2003 · · Score: 1

      But when you buy a book you don't have the ability to instantly make perfect copies as many times as you want.

    20. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      ummmm - 'Janus' anyone?

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    21. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sanscrit? Wrong religion, see Hinduism.

    22. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I can't tell one from the other. My point was that constant maintenance of a database is going to bugger it up eventually. It would be better to insure that the original lasts as long as absolutely possible.

      --
      What?
    23. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by cynicalmoose · · Score: 1

      Certainly, breaking a simple civil agreement between two parties is never illegal - though you may end up with a writ for doing it.

      However, if you break that agreement in a criminal way, for example by copying in such a way as to violate the provisions of the DMCA should you be in the US, then that would be illegal. What's important is that the criminal act is legally separate from the cause of the civil suit, even though they may have been made at the same time by the same action. (this is pedantic, I know)

      I Would Like To Be An IP Lawyer

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
    24. Re:iTunes doesn't rot by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      IANAL but I do believe this fits into the DMC. Violation of the DMC is ILLEGAL...

      Really? I didn't realize that it was illegal to violate the Delorean Motors Corporation :)

      Yes, yes, I know... you meant the DMCA.

      --

      Place sig here.
  3. "than We Thought? by damiam · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Has any /. reader not heard about this? Several times?

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    1. Re:"than We Thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. See here.

    2. Re:"than We Thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look, all you people bitching about how we heard this already need to RTFA. This is a different type of rot, that last article was about CD-R and CD-RWs, this article is mostly about industrially produced discs, made with a stamp not a laser?

    3. Re:"than We Thought? by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0

      You ought to get a life, no one has time to RTFA, except the unemployed; or soon to be.

    4. Re:"than We Thought? by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Wow, even more amazing than /. reposting old articles ... someone actually bothered to read one - that's surely worth a story of its own ...

      IIRC, CD rot was an old phenomenon of some of the very early discs, caused by the reflective layer being exposed to the air at the edge of the disc. It was fixed yonks ago and shouldn't be a problem with modern discs.

      [doing some quick googling ...] There's a nice article here that includes several detailed links about CD rot, and also notes that it only affects discs made in the late 80s/early 90s by a certain manufacturer in the UK (PDO) - who will in fact replace them if you contact them.

    5. Re:"than We Thought? by Hagakure · · Score: 1

      CD rot doesn't occur only on PDO discs, I have some others around that have suffered the same fate.. I've seen at least 15 PDO discs that have rotten, and while bronzing is the easiest way to tell, there's a slow erosion to the sound, a creeping fuzz that gets louder as the disc gets closer to bronze. Tthe first few tracks may sound fine as the outer edges tend to bronze up/rot first.

      PDO has replaced some of these for me (when I've bothered) but one in particular was a gold CD and wasn't replaced as such.. Earlier comments said gold were less prone to rot, but this is the worst sounding of the lot.

      --


      If this is Heaven I'm bailin out! I cant tolerate this ol tin-tub, so fulla trash and rats...
  4. Immortal? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't last 10 seconds in the microwave.

    1. Re:Immortal? by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't last 10 seconds in the microwave.

      They don't do too well in close proximity to a Tesla coil, either.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Immortal? by magarity · · Score: 1

      They don't do too well in close proximity to a Tesla coil

      Tesla coils are all very fun for the kids but for real entertainment put a CD in the middle of a Jacob's Ladder.

    3. Re:Immortal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What does this headline really mean?
      CDs May be Less Immortal...

      immortal adj. Not subject to death.

      less adv. To a smaller extent, degree, or frequency

      "Less immortal" == "Not subject to death, to a smaller extent or degree"?
      Hmm...isn't "subject to death" a binary variable?

    4. Re:Immortal? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      They last a little longer on a Dremel

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Immortal? by p4ul13 · · Score: 1
      Always remember: Immortal != Indestructable

      Sure they'll get damaged if you toss them in the microwave, but if you store them in a hermetically sealed container filled with an inert gas like they are intended to be kept, then they'll last indefinitly. =)

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    6. Re:Immortal? by bakeacake · · Score: 1

      Or Dremel

  5. This has nothing to do with age... by st0rmshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most CDs that have come out in the last 5 years have been nothing but rot...

    1. Re:This has nothing to do with age... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. But there are plenty of classic albums to purchase in CD form.

    2. Re:This has nothing to do with age... by CthuluElder · · Score: 1

      God you must be so old...

      Mod me Troll please

    3. Re:This has nothing to do with age... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, to clean it up, you need to scrape the silvery layer away.

  6. DUH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if cd's would last 100 years.

  7. funny you say that by ashot · · Score: 0

    becuase there is officially a limit on the number of times you can encode your files on to CD (used to be 10, lowered to 7).

    --
    -ashot
    1. Re:funny you say that by CanSpice · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, there's a limit on how many times you can encode the same playlist to CD. You can burn a song to CD as many times as you want.

    2. Re:funny you say that by foidulus · · Score: 1

      That is how many times you can burn a static playlist. Don't ask me why. (If it were the songs, you could always make a copy of the file when you first burn it, then copy the song back over once you are done) I don't know why they did this, maybe just to please the RIAA overlords.

    3. Re:funny you say that by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is how many times you can burn a static playlist. Don't ask me why.

      To make it inconvenient to mass-produce CD's from iTunes.

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:funny you say that by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      This arguement doesn't make much sense; you could just take your iTunes CD, load up Nero/etc. and start copying away.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    5. Re:funny you say that by p4ul13 · · Score: 1
      Thats all well and good, but that has little to do with backing up the songs.

      Myself, I back mine up to a spare hard drive and never have to touch iTunes to do so.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    6. Re:funny you say that by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it's not iTunes' problem. Basically, all Apple cares about is making iTunes legit. By not facilitating mass production, they can claim they thier product doesn't contribute to piracy.

      Once the CD is made, it's the same problem they've always had with CD copying. ie: not Apple's problem.
      =Smidge=

    7. Re:funny you say that by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is why we have FLAC and redundant backup systems.

    8. Re:funny you say that by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      There's a limit to the number of times you can burna specific PLAYLIST to a CD. You can burna given song as many times as you want, but if you want more than 7 copies of a certain CD, you'll need to re-create the playlist. All that rule does is make it more of a pain for someone to burn copies of his iTunes songs for his entire school.

      It is not a DRM issue.

    9. Re:funny you say that by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      1) Burn CD
      2) Plop CD into CD duplicator
      3) ???
      4) Profit!!!

      Or if you don't have a duplicator, you should be able to just put the CD back into the computer, make an image using your favorite burning software, then roll as many copies as you want.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    10. Re:funny you say that by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Or you can just drag the songs to a new playlist every 7 burns, delete the old old, and get 7 more. Like I said, it only makes it less convenient.

    11. Re:funny you say that by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      But there's no limit to the number of backups you can make. You can even make iTunes do incremental backups.

      Try another flavor of Kool-aid.

  8. Dupe? by Wolfier · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Dupe? by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's apparent that the editors only search their CD backups when they check for dupes.

      It's also apparent that they store these CDs next to (or on top of) their (literally) smoking hot, case-modded, overclocked Athlon gaming boxes/workstations.

      (it's a joke...laugh....please don't hurt me Mr. Malda...)

    2. Re:Dupe? by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Funny

      It looks like this has come up at least four times before. Is this some kind of record?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:Dupe? by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot keeps its archives on CD-R. Each time they go to check for dupes before posting, they come up with nothing. :)

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
  9. bah... by Drantin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Everyone that collects stuff on CD-Rs knows they don't last long... I've got some from two years ago that don't work, and it's the first time they've been removed from their case since they were burned...

    --
    Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    1. Re:bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for buying that spindle of 50 CD-Rs for free after rebate along with burning them on your $50 (after rebate) no name drive. Stick with reputable brands and you might have been better off.

    2. Re:bah... by cft_128 · · Score: 1

      RTFA, its talking about normal purchased CDs and DVDs, not CD-Rs and DVD-Rs ... of course that has been discussed on before Slashdot too. Another argument why we need fair use back.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    3. Re:bah... by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0

      What is this rebate stuff? Unfair discounts should be reported to: WTO

    4. Re:bah... by endoboy · · Score: 1

      nah... the CD drive was free too (after rebate)...

  10. i think by abscondment · · Score: 1, Troll

    I think the severity of this must have to do with some manufacturing technique. Some of the first CDs I ever bought are still in perfect shape, while others from more recent purchases are experiencing this. Anyone else confirm this?

  11. WE KNOW. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We know CDs suck for longevity. This has been discussed on Slashdot more than JonKatz.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:WE KNOW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A-fucking-men. This is hardly news for nerds nor stuff that matters. Any "nerd" (or geek, rather) who hasn't known about this for years is an idiot. It's only been beaten to death here and everywhere else for the last few years.

    2. Re:WE KNOW. by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Not really. One of the key factors of CDs is how they can hold data for a long time. Why do you think people back up old VHS tapes to DVD format? Because it's digital? I don't think so.

      CDs are made to store data over the years and to keep it there. That's one reason why it's so popular today.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    3. Re:WE KNOW. by criordan · · Score: 1

      You're mixing up the general public with the /. crowd. We've already read 3-4 times about how CDs degrade over the years.

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    4. Re:WE KNOW. by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Just put it like this. The public is a lot bigger than the /. crowd and I think they should be taken more into consideration while selling these products than us. No offense to anyone though.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    5. Re:WE KNOW. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      what ever happened to JonKatz? did we piss him off how we made fun of him all the time or did he die?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:WE KNOW. by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      I think he got outted as a kook after the whole faked "Junis in Afghanistan" thing....then he quietly vanished. (Do a search on it...it's hilarious - and this guy writes books on Geeks?!) Katz is/was insane.

      I can only hope more people start seeing Michael for what he is someday.

  12. Whoever thought they lasted a long time? by moxruby · · Score: 1

    For the past three or four years I've known not to trust CDRs beyond a year.
    I spend a few hours reburning each cd, archiving the old ones and throwing out the previous archive.

    It looks like the DVD format has stabilised somewhat so I may have to consider springing for a writer. while I'll still do yearly backup, I'll need seven times fewer discs.

    1. Re:Whoever thought they lasted a long time? by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Stabilized? They just came out with a sixth standard (DVD-R DL), and a seventh (DVD+R DL) is just around the corner.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  13. CD-Rs good after 10 years. by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recently had to restore some data from CD-Rs I wrote a long time ago. One was labelled Sep 23rd 1993. Back when you got a 63minute CD-R for 25 ($40) a piece.

    Everything restored perfectly. Now, I wonder whether todays discs at less than 1/100 of that price will even last remotely as long as those discs did.

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 5, Informative

      My first CD-Rs (over 10 years old) also still work perfectly. Some simple rules I follow are:
      - Buy CD-Rs withouth printed label (the printing process causes material stress)
      - Burn them at low speed (the lowest my current burner allows with my SW is 8x)
      - Verify the data after writing (very important!)
      - Always be careful with the label side (e.g. don't put that side on the table, dirt could cause scratches)
      - Prevent hot temperatures and direct sunlight

      I later found some advisory text that basically said the same thing.

    2. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I later found some advisory text that basically said the same thing.

      I googled a bit and found that text again (was in /. before) here

    3. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      - Put them in a box totally dark at 25 degrees celsius with very very low humidity (better in vacuum because the vacuum doesn't oxide the aluminum).

      open4free

    4. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by DA-MAN · · Score: 4, Informative

      All those suggestions are good except this one:

      - Burn them at low speed (the lowest my current burner allows with my SW is 8x)

      This is actually false, at least pertaining to newer faster drives. The new drives are less accurate when writing at low speeds, because they are built with the assumption that people will burn at the highest speed available to them. Thus burning at slower speeds actually degrades the accuracy of the burn, which may result in sooner than normal data loss.

      However all the rest are right on the money.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    5. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mod this up.

      I know it's offtopic to talk about moderation, but people here need to know this. I didn't know it until recently, but it's true. It's hard now to find the ideal speed, but the old rule of slower is better doesn't work anymore. I lots of problems with media that will not burn at speeds lower than 16x. Of course these days my big media fights are with DVDs. Grrr.

    6. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by NoData · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - Always be careful with the label side (e.g. don't put that side on the table, dirt could cause scratches)

      I don't get this tip. Could you elaborate? One would think the "data" side should be handled with more care...If I have to put a CD on the desk, I usually put it label side down. Is the label side more delicate than the "data" side?

    7. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by jridley · · Score: 3, Informative

      The label side IS where the data is. The "bottom" side is just a piece of plastic. The reflective layer and all the good stuff is on top. On a factory CD, that's covered with silkscreened ink. If the bottom gets scratched up, you can buff out the scratches with no damage. The "CD/DVD DRx" tool that you can buy in the stores is actually just a ring of fine (like, 2000 grit) wet/dry sandpaper, and the tool sands the scratches out of the bottom of the disc.

      I personally put the round labels on the top; it protects the top from scratches. I know, I've heard people saying labels are bad for the discs, but so far I've been doing the label thing for about 5 years, across about 4000 CDs and DVDs, and no problems so far.

    8. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by jridley · · Score: 1

      Just last week, I went to the basement and pulled a whole spindle of old archive CDs to see how the data was holding up. The oldest was written in late 1993, I tested the oldest 10 using Nero CDSpeed's scandisc function. All discs were 100% readable, 6 of 10 with no errors at all, the other 4 with just a few (less than 5) sectors with recoverable read errors (would go unnoticed when just reading the discs).

    9. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Everything restored perfectly. Now, I wonder whether todays discs at less than 1/100 of that price will even last remotely as long as those discs did.

      A good rule of thumb nowadays is to burn at a slower speed than what the disc is rated for. I have a 12x burner (LG) and use 16x discs (Memorex) with it. No complaints at all so far. Back when that particular disc you mentioned was burned, you were probably only able to do it at 1x, or 2x at the most right? I would expect solid results from that, if you had a decent burner at the time.

      I noticed an interesting thing a few years ago when I was using Fuji discs, which I will never buy anymore. I would often get read errors when trying to read a newly burned disc.. If I put the files into ZIP compression before burning, and then used Winzip to transfer them back to my harddrive, I would be given the chance to retry to get past the checksum errors. Enough retries (sometimes a LOT of retries were needed) and I would get my data back in perfect condition eventually. So my suggestion would be to burn really critical stuff in ZIP format, or anything where your favorite decompression software lets you retry. I really wish Windows was a bit smarter in that regard, as these read errors I was getting were obviously recoverable.

    10. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Years ago when I first got my 12x drive (they had just come out) it was a Plextor. The 12x discs weren't easily available yet, so I used the 8x discs at 12x. No errors ever with that drive, and I just checjed a few CDs I burned back then, and they still work.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    11. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by prockcore · · Score: 1

      The new drives are less accurate when writing at low speeds, because they are built with the assumption that people will burn at the highest speed available to them.

      I don't know if I agree with that. The cdrom in this Pismo Powerbook reports errors with cdrs burned at anything above 10x. It can read the disc, but it reports corruption every 200 megs or so. The disc validates perfectly in my PC. Burn at 8x and the powerbook doesn't have a problem with it.

      The problem may be with the drive, or it may be with the media not being very accurate. I haven't seen any real evidence dealing with burn speeds and cdrom reliability, so I don't know.

    12. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Zurd3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup, the label side has less protection than the data side. Always put your cd on the data side, you'll need a bigger dent in it to make that CD unreadable versus the label side.

    13. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new drives are less accurate when writing at low speeds, because they are built with the assumption that people will burn at the highest speed available to them.

      Hmmm, I question this. With all the new drives coming out at 52X max burn speed, I have yet to get one to burn at any faster than 25X, even on fire-breathing 3 GHz machines.

      Has anyone actually achieved 52X on their burner? Am I missing something?

    14. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Has anyone actually achieved 52X on their burner? Am I missing something?

      Its all in how fast the data can be read from your hard drives before its burned onto the cd - use a nice RAID 0 setup with 15k rpm drives and you might have a chance of seeing your 52X

    15. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      My first CD-Rs (over 10 years old) also still work perfectly. Some simple rules I follow are:
      - Buy CD-Rs withouth printed label (the printing process causes material stress)
      - Burn them at low speed (the lowest my current burner allows with my SW is 8x)
      - Verify the data after writing (very important!)
      - Always be careful with the label side (e.g. don't put that side on the table, dirt could cause scratches)
      - Prevent hot temperatures and direct sunlight


      Good, but you should also add recovery data to those CDs using QuickPar.

      Right now, once you discover that your discs have been damaged, it's too late to recover the data files that have been stored on the discs. With the addition of recovery data, you can add a "window of recovery" which allows you to correct errors that are too much for the C1/C2 error correction to fix. Depending on your risk-averseness, you can make that recovery window larger/smaller by including more/less recovery data.

      Some folks even spread the PAR2 files across multiple disks, say taking 5 disks of data, creating 40% recovery data (2 additional disks worth), and then evenly spreading the 40% recovery data and the protected data across 7 disks. In that scenario, you can physically lose up to 2 disks and still get your data back.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    16. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      Actually, on a lot of my CD-Rs, I packed files in RAR archives with recovery records enabled. This allows similar corruption detection/correction. Although QuickPar seems to be a better tool (allowing more redundant data). Thanks for the link.

    17. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      The bottom side is just a mm of transparant plastic. It is quite resistant to scratches, since the laser beam's diameter is wide upon entry of this plastic and then diverges (due to diffraction in the plastic) to a point on the data layer. Scratching the label side will destroy the data layer, which is immediately below the label. You can see this with an old CD-R when you break it: the label paint will have a reflective coating underneath. This is the actual data layer.

    18. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Informative

      On CD-R, the physical structure is that there's about 1 mm of plastic on the bottom (non-label), then a data layer, then the reflective layer, then a thin layer of laquer(?) then the label.

      Since the reflective layer is so close to the label side, writing on the label side with a hard-tip pen will damage/distort/dimple the reflective layer.

      DVD-R is much better, the data/reflective layer is in the middle of the media, roughly 0.6mm of plastic on *both* sides. (The reason that the data layer is at a different depth is because DVD media was designed for dual-sided, unlike CD-R.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    19. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Actually, on a lot of my CD-Rs, I packed files in RAR archives with recovery records enabled. This allows similar corruption detection/correction. Although QuickPar seems to be a better tool (allowing more redundant data). Thanks for the link.

      RAR with recovery records does indeed work well. (Same idea.)

      My personal objection to using RAR as an archive format is that it's a closed-source program that uses a proprietary format. I archive using ZIP because there exist open-source implementations of ZIP tools (Info-ZIP), plus I know that just about any operating system out there has had the Info-ZIP tools ported to it.

      While QuickPar isn't open-source, there's a command-line version that is... so again, I'm pretty confident that I'll be able to get my data back even if I change operating systems.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    20. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by rthille · · Score: 0

      I heard that, but I don't believe it. On a 'normal' CD, it appears to be true, but on CD-Rs, it appears that there's approximately equal protection on both sides. Check out my images here:
      CD Edge Images.

      Also note how at the edge at least how wavy the line is. This is from a bargain-basement CDR, and a Keyspan USB-Serial Driver CD.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    21. Re:CD-Rs good after 10 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're misinterpreting those pictures. The 'wavy line' which you apparently take to be the interface between an upper and lower layer is certainly not such an interface. It'd take a damn fast focusing mechanism to read anything written on such an uneven surface! The wavy line is just spillover of the sprayed-on top coating (think, icing on a cake).

      To prove this to yourself, do the microwave trick - stick an unwanted CD-R in a microwave for a few seconds, till it flashes - and look at the flakes that come off. This is all the protection the data layer has - and it's so thin you can barely even feel it between your fingers.

  14. Just a while back... by goats_in_boats · · Score: 1

    WE never thought they were immortal
    How can something be 'less immortal' anyway? You either is or you ain't, no middle ground. Sort of like 'less dead', 'less unborn', or 'less unemployed'

    One of the few, the immortal names, That were not born to die. Fitz-Greene Halleck (1790-1867)

    1. Re:Just a while back... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, I was watching Princess Bride and saw a guy who was only 'mostly dead'...

  15. (yawn) by McDutchie · · Score: 2, Informative

    CNN is a bit late to catch up with this...

    1. Re:(yawn) by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 0, Redundant

      In Soviet Russia, CNN prints old Slashdot news!

  16. this begs the question.... by User+956 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, the RIAA has argued that we merely have a license for one copy of the music when we buy a CD. When the CD corrodes, does this mean we can turn in the rotted disc for a pristine one?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:this begs the question.... by DarKrow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the music chain "The Wall" used to advertise a lifetime guarantee on their CDs. If one broke, scratched beyond playablity, or other such damages, you could take it back to the store and they would replace it free.

      The Wall is now FYE Music, and they no longer *advertise* the lifetime guarantee. It still exists, though. I've been meaning to replace my Dark Side of the Moon CD, because of a dime sized abrasion on the shiny side. I'm also considering replacing my Talking Heads "Sand In The Vaseline"d iscs, but it might be better just to get the box set instead.

      --

      It lives up to it's name: http://www.sanspoint.com
    2. Re:this begs the question.... by mph · · Score: 1
      Actually, the music chain "The Wall" used to advertise a lifetime guarantee on their CDs. If one broke, scratched beyond playablity, or other such damages, you could take it back to the store and they would replace it free.
      This was incredibly handy in the days of cassette tapes, and evil tape-eating players.
    3. Re:this begs the question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If what you pay for is for the rights to listen to the music and not the media... should we get media replacements with reduced cost?

      We already payed for the rights, didn't we?

  17. Sheesh. by Doctor+O · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The dupes keep coming. Keep up the good work, CowboyNeal!

    If this were a "real" news site like, say, GoogleNews, you would call it "informing me from several sources", not "why does this $%& Google News thing post so many dupes!!1!". Talk about selective perception. Just a thought.

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  18. Obvious... by applef00 · · Score: 1

    ...to anyone who bought CDs in the '80s. I've got one particular first-generation Billy Idol CD that is totally rotted out.

    1. Re:Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check who printed it. Nimbus are guilty of shit disks in my 80s collection.

  19. I remember when by Windcatcher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    CD's originally included Tellurium in their composition when they first came out, and a lot of people were concerned that it would oxidize. The effect would be that CD's produced in 1981 would become unreadable in ten years or so. I'm given to understand that aluminum is now used, but I wonder what ever became of those early CD's.

    1. Re:I remember when by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a Blues Brothers CD (movie soundtrack) from 1980 that works perfectly to this day.

    2. Re:I remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Considering that the CD standard wasn't established until 1981, and they weren't launched until 1982 -- I think you may be mistaken.

      http://www.medialinenews.com/issues/2002/october /c over1002.shtml

    3. Re:I remember when by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering that the CD standard wasn't established until 1981, and they weren't launched until 1982 -- I think you may be mistaken.

      What I know is this -- on the CD it says "(P) 1980 Atlantic Recording Corporation." On the liner notes it says "(P) (C) 1980 Atlantic Recording Corporation." There is also a long paragraph about how wonderful CDs are:

      "The Compact Disc Digital Audio System offers the best possible sound reproduction -- on a small, convenient sound-carrier unit. The Compact Disc's remarkable performance is the result of a unique combination of digital playback with laser optics. [care instructions follow] If you follow these suggestions, the Compact Disc will provide a lifetime of pure listening enjoyment."

      The disc has the familar "COMPACT disc DIGITAL AUDIO" logo and is Atlantic CD 16017.

      I also have a Star Trek soundtrack CD from 1985 that works fine too.

    4. Re:I remember when by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      The effect would be that CD's produced in 1981 would become unreadable in ten years or so. I'm given to understand that aluminum is now used, but I wonder what ever became of those early CD's.

      I have a number of CDs from the early- and mid-1980s, and they all play fine. Of course, they're in good condition too, because I don't mistreat them. :) I love going to peoples' houses and seeing bare CDs strewn about the living room, and then they wonder why they can't find a given CD, or why it won't play after they do find it...

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    5. Re:I remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Established" doesn't mean that the standard wasn't in a roughly usable form by the time 1980 rolled around. I remember those big video disks coming out even before VHS took hold (in what seems like ages ago).

    6. Re:I remember when by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've got a Beatles CD that says (C) 1963 right on the disc. Either the CD format was in beta longer than we thought, or more likely, the copyright applies to the audio recording independent of the medium it's fixed in.

    7. Re:I remember when by iantri · · Score: 1

      It could be that it was re-released on CD.. this was fairly common (usually accompanied by a cheesy "Defects in the sound quality are the result of studio recording on analog tape..." message).

    8. Re:I remember when by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I think that's the copyright date, not manufacture.

      --
      What?
    9. Re:I remember when by Patik · · Score: 4, Funny
      I've got a Beatles CD that says (C) 1963 right on the disc.
      Pfff, that's nothing, I've got a Mozart CD that says (c) 1767.
    10. Re:I remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you don't.

    11. Re:I remember when by Patik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right.

    12. Re:I remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod parent down. He's fucking retarded. The copyright date has nothing to do with the year the disc was pressed. Unless I'm wrong and my Pet Sounds CD box was somehow pressed back in the fucking 60s. I've got the same Blues Brothers CD and I guarantee it wasn't pressed in 1980 dummy. If you go buy the disc tomorrow it'll still read 1980. Do you think the store ordered too many copies and they've got 24 year old overstock? What an asshat.

    13. Re:I remember when by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      CD's originally included Tellurium in their composition when they first came out

      Considering that the CD standard wasn't established until 1981, and they weren't launched until 1982 -- I think you may be mistaken.

      CDs went into public release in Japan in 1982. They were available for demonstration by the 1977 Tokyo Audio Fair. Sony claims to have had a working CD as early as 1969, but what I've seen is merely a 'laser tape' - a 2" tape that can be read by a laser.

      The point is that he isn't mistaken if he is referring to "first came out" as "first working model that everyone could look at and feel all giddy inside".

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    14. Re:I remember when by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 1

      I have several CDs with two copyright dates on them -- that of the original recording, and that of the CD pressing (including the CD artwork/etc, which is copyrighted). If there's only one, then which is it? It's not always clear. Obviously that Beatles CD was not made in 1963, but it's not impossible that a beta CD was made in 1980. Of course a subsequent pressing would still say 1980, but how can you tell?

    15. Re:I remember when by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      I think the 'Circle-P' symbol is for a performance copyright.

    16. Re:I remember when by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Dude - are you serious? I mean... seriously? You think because it was copyrighted in 1980 that it must have been pressed in 1980?

      If you're trolling, props to you. That's devilishly clever.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    17. Re:I remember when by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      You can't copywrite Mozart.

      They copywrite the production, though there are free orchestral recordings of all the good stuff out there.

    18. Re:I remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I'm not.

    19. Re:I remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a Beatles CD that says (C) 1963 right on the disc.

      Pfff, that's nothing, I've got a Mozart CD that says (c) 1767.


      Losers! I've got a bible on a CD-ROM that says: "(C) 0 - and that's not AD!".

    20. Re:I remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Pfff, that's nothing, I've got a Mozart CD that says (c) 1767. .. and Mozart was famous for being capable of humming how the orchestra
      would sound like, just by looking at the pits and lands of the CD. Quite
      a useful skill back then, when CD players were not around yet.

    21. Re:I remember when by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I always thought that was the publishing date.

      Though I think I've seen it on Euro-import CDs rather than domestic (US) releases.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    22. Re:I remember when by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it could be publishing date. I do know that I've seen it on albums from American labels though. The mystery grows deeper and deeper...

  20. Is this why by tbjw · · Score: 5, Funny

    the music on the radio sounds worse every year?

  21. Other news: by xintegerx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The whole music industry may be less immoral than we've ever thought.

    1. Re:Other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The whole music industry may be less immoral than we've ever thought.


      Although the music industry might be less immortal than you thought, I seriously doubt it's less immoral.
    2. Re:Other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean, more immoral? I mean, come on, this seems close to peddling pond scum...

  22. I reccommend by anything900 · · Score: 1
  23. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  24. Duct Tape by Yonkeltron · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's nothing a little duct tape can't fix!

    --
    Keep the faith, share the code
    1. Re:Duct Tape by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Quick! Someone get Red Green on the phone!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  25. Static by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the pictures, this is exactly what happens when I hold up AOL cds to my Van De Graff generator. Could static be causing it?

    g-zilla

  26. Whew. by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Funny

    The article also describes related problems with CD-Rs, CD-RWs and DVDs.

    Good thing DVD -R and DVD+RWs aren't affected.

  27. I heard some amazing news! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The idea is that you package bread in plastic bags already sliced. Saves lots of time. Oh yeah...I also heard a news report that someone has come up with the idea of making wheels round. Apparently the ride is much smoother than with other shapes. Of course it could just be hype...

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  28. The CDs are not the problem by Sean80 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Forget the CDs, the technology will change before the CDs rot.

    Take my DVD collection, for example. Already the companies are battling to define the next standard. Who wants to bet that, if I take my DVDs down to the Target and ask for the same movie in the new format, I'm gonna get laughed into the ground? People's Betamax tapes are probably rotting too, you know?

    A technology-independent, perpetual, safe storage service for the general public is just a business opportunity waiting to happen. So is the market to sell rights to a movie or song, independent of its format.

    1. Re:The CDs are not the problem by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A technology-independent, perpetual, safe storage service for the general public is just a business opportunity waiting to happen.

      Ha. The Sumarians came up with a solution 5500 years ago...

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    2. Re:The CDs are not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think we caught the RIAA/MPAA in a gaffe. If we are buying a single license for a movie or an album (as according to the RIAA and the MPAA), we should be able to go exchange our DVDs for whatever comes out next at no cost. After all, we paid for a license for that movie, notwithstanding the format. But, this will not happen in a million years. It seems they like to play both sides of the coin, as that is the most profitable. When we claim in a a physical product, they claim it is a license and when we claim it is a license, they say it is a physical product.

    3. Re:The CDs are not the problem by Sean80 · · Score: 1

      This is the most insightful posting on Slashdot today. Maybe even this week. Damnit when I don't have moderator points!

    4. Re:The CDs are not the problem by cmowire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The thing is, I think the technology-independent prepetual storage device isn't particularly important. Really, you just need to preserve for a relatively long span of time the ability to play stuff back. The interesting part about the evolution in optical formats has been the drive to have stuff in the CD-sized disk. So a DVD drive can read CDs as well and can handle a multitude of different application formats. Notice that the WORM and MD drives didn't catch on, but CD-R and CD-RW drives did. All of the next standard formats will have enough of the origional CD and DVD standards in them to make it so that your old media will work in the new player.

      Besides, if we can get the media biz off of the DRM crack-pipe, you'll just stuff it all onto your massive multi-terabyte hard drive down the road.

      I don't mind that my CDs may rot that much, as long as I'm allowed to back them up onto new media. Folks have been faced with that problem many times. My parents would always buy a record and then copy it to a cassette tape because they wanted to keep the record in good condition.

      I don't think your idea to be able to sell rights to a song or movie, independent of format, will fly, either. You end up destroying the incentive for the creator of the media to offer a better format in the first place unless it was hideously expensive, such that you'd only do that for your favorite movies or songs.

    5. Re:The CDs are not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the vendors ever claimed that Betamax tapes would never wear out and would last a lifetime.

      I can find those claims all over the CDs in my collection -- at least, the early ones.

    6. Re:The CDs are not the problem by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1, Interesting
      If we are buying a single license for a movie or an album (as according to the RIAA and the MPAA), we should be able to go exchange our DVDs for whatever comes out next at no cost.
      I don't think we'd ever get the "at no cost" bit through, and I don't really think that would be fair anyway - there's manufacturing and distribution costs for a start. How would it be fair for me to expect to exchange my scratched, rotted DVD for a shiny new Super-Opto Vidcube(TM) at no cost?

      If we look at paying only for the fair and reasonable costs for a replacement in the new or the same format, we're looking at removing the royalty component of the cost - that's what, five to ten percent? By the time we then look at what would be needed to properly audit such a system (sighting and destroying old media to ensure no infringing copies exist, audit docmentation etc) there are additional costs - plus this is a new service, and it's only going to happen if there's a dollar in it for the record companies.

      Much as I hate to say it, I don't believe we'll get the ability to download and burn anything we have a licence for to whatever media we wish until such time as there is a decent DRM system in place. One that lets us re-assign our rights if we decide we don't like something, in just the same way as we can sell a CD or DVD we discover we hate. One that allows us to treat our local media as a disposable copy that will eventually wear out and be replaced by a new, fault-free copy.

      One issue that will have to be addressed in any such system is what constitutes a "licenced work". Say I licence a movie under such a system, and it's the dying days of the DVD era. I download and burn my DVD image (complete with digital fingerprints so I can be slapped on the wrist if I do the wrong thing - hey, fair's fair) and six months later my son decides to see what happens when you microwave DVDs. I've just bought a Super-Opto Vidcube(TM) player, and the local 7-11 has a writer that will legally write licenced materials on my behalf if I drop a $30 coin in it. I notice that there's an enhanced-definition version available, but the scum-sucking parasitic Hollywood types won't let me burn it unless I buy a licence for it! That's Wrong! I bought the movie, I should get the new format for free! The most it will do is let me write to the cube in DVD-Compatibility mode! And they should throw in the cube for nothing! Which brings us back to the original point...

    7. Re:The CDs are not the problem by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      It endures, but no one knows how to read it. There's a moral there somewhere....

    8. Re:The CDs are not the problem by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      > Who wants to bet that, if I take my DVDs down to the Target and ask for the same movie in the new format, I'm gonna get laughed into the ground? People's Betamax tapes are probably rotting too, you know?

      It's funny you mention this. Walking into my building today, I saw two plastic bags full of VHS tapes sitting out where bins of trash are picked up by the garbage collector. The endless march of technology has passed them by.

    9. Re:The CDs are not the problem by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm being picky but the article refers to work on the Harappan civilisation with only tangential reference to the Sumerians. But still the 5,500 years ago figure is still good, probably applies to Sumer as well.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    10. Re:The CDs are not the problem by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

      When we claim in a a physical product, they claim it is a license and when we claim it is a license, they say it is a physical product.

      Perhaps the terms of the license specify that it expires when the physical lifetime of the original medium is reached... /devil's advocate

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    11. Re:The CDs are not the problem by shark72 · · Score: 1

      Books are also the same way. If you buy a copy of, say, The Da Vinci Code, you do not get the rights to republish or copy it, but at the same time, you don't get the option of turning it in for a newer or different edition. I'm surprised that more Slashdotters aren't aware of this.

      Software is similar. The physical media is typically covered by a warranty. When you buy a copy of Windows XP, you do not own the rights to the Windows XP operating system; rather, a license to use it. Per the Windows XP EULA, the media is warranted against physical defects for 90 days.

      Again, a pretty well-known fact about software which I'm surprised isn't more well known by Slashdotters.

      Either way, I'm not sure of the point of calling out the MPAA/RIAA for something that's been practiced by book and software publishers for longer than most of us have been alive.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    12. Re:The CDs are not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we are buying a single license for a movie or an album, we should be able to go exchange our DVDs for whatever comes out next at no cost. After all, we paid for a license for that movie, notwithstanding the format.

      So, I can take my "Bat out of Hell" 8-track down to Best Buy and exchange it for a CD of the same album?

      Sweet!

    13. Re:The CDs are not the problem by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Books are also the same way. If you buy a copy of, say, The Da Vinci Code, you do not get the rights to republish or copy it, but at the same time, you don't get the option of turning it in for a newer or different edition.

      But you do get the right to do anything you want with the book OTHER than republishing or copying it. No nonsense about where or how you can read it. No problems about resale of the physical object. Clear "fair use" rights for purposes such as literary criticism. The DMCA has allowed the copyright holder to impose a great variety of restrictions on what and how the purchaser of the "copy" can make use of it -- terms that are much more typical of a license than a traditional copyright. At the same time, the copyright holders (eg, the members of the MPAA) don't want to make it a "real" license because then they would be expected to warrant the performance of the medium through which they delivered the content. IMO, one of the important distinctions between a movie on DVD and Windows XP on CD is that, after the original installation, there is seldom a reason to take the Windows CD off the shelf -- very little wear-and-tear. The movie, OTOH, requires that you run it through a player and risk damage anytime you want to make use of it.

    14. Re:The CDs are not the problem by jazzer · · Score: 1
      However, it may be the same movie, doesn't mean it has the exact same content... Which is what you are paying the license for. IE, it could have new features or a higher sampling rate and it would be a different product (ie content).

      Thankfully living in Canada I can back up all the CD's I like. Haven't tried any copy-controlled "CD"'s (seeing as I'm convinced they interfere with my right to back up my cd, I won't buy them)

    15. Re:The CDs are not the problem by bardgirl · · Score: 1

      The thing is, I think the technology-independent prepetual storage device isn't particularly important. Really, you just need to preserve for a relatively long span of time the ability to play stuff back.

      But media like paper or stone or even film either require no equipment to "play back" or the design and construction of said equipment is relatively transparent. Given a reel of film, which you can retrieve data from just by holding it up to a light source, constructing a projector is not too hard. Given a CD or DVD or piece of magnetic tape, the task is much harder. Of course this doesn't take into account the knowledge needed to decode languages one doesn't speak/read, but at least with stone and paper they are right there in front of you, with no intermediate decoding necessary.

      I think there hasn't been nearly enough thought put into solid, durable, archival media yet. And I know that slap dash adoption of new fangled archival technology has resulted in data being irretrievably lost. Check out Nicholas Baker's book on the subject.

    16. Re:The CDs are not the problem by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Actually, making a proper film projector that doesn't break the film, plays it back at the proper rate, etc. isn't trivial.

      You've got two options. If you store things on most forms of digital media, you are not guaranteed a long media lifespan, but when you copy the data, you don't lose anything.

      If you have analog media, like film or paper, you have a slightly longer window of opportunity when your media is degrading, but it's also problematic. Remember, an incredible percentage of the litarary output since the 19th century has been printed on wood-base paper that is slowly decaying. Folks didn't realize until much more recently that this was happening. Movie film requires incredibly expensive freezer storage or else it decays pretty rapidly. And you can't make lossless copies, every time you copy it, you lose something.

      The problem is that archival media isn't. It's just media that decays a little slower than otherwise, but it all requires care. It either requires a team of librarians who protect relatively massive low-tech storage of information, or it requires a well thought-out digital system.

      The digital system is actually not that hard. You just need to accept that you need a building stuffed with hard disks, plus a backup building of hard disks. The reason why so many old files aren't readable isn't necessarily because the creators did stupid things, it's because they packed them efficently and didn't wory about what would happen when they were gone, generally because they figured their system would be replaced with something better.

      The biggest thing is that the easiest files to read are the ones that nobody wants to store because they are so huge. If you scanned an image 20 years ago and saved it as a simple bitmap and had an accompanying description that explained that it was x pixels by y pixels, with a specific color depth and pixel format, with a specific reference primary, etc. it will be pretty easy to read it. If you stored it in some weird compressed format, say an Apple II HGR screendump, where the format requires special interpretation, and don't include documentation on the format, etc. then it's pretty hard to read. If I store a database dump in the AppleWorks GS database format, I won't be able to read it. If I stored it as a CSV file or a text file or an XML file and include explanations of the fields, it's still readable.

      The problem is, storing it in a future-proof way is going to take up a lot more space because you don't want to use any sort of nifty encodings or compression. Hence a building full of drives.

      Similarly, you can avoid decay if you pay attention. You can't just put a CD-R on a shelf and expect it to last 100 years. You need to be able to verify that a drive is still functioning properly and replace it when it fails. You need to be able to upgrade the servers every few years so that they are still able to interface with the rest of the world. Like keeping paper media around, this requires care.

      The thing is, eventually your analog media will die, no matter how well you take care of it, no matter how careful you are. So you need to copy, except that every copy you make of analog media involves loss.

    17. Re:The CDs are not the problem by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      But there is no written license agreed to by the purchaser, not even packaged with the DVD, so the terms of copyright codified in the law take effect - giving you the right to make copies for personal use.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  29. Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Simon+Carr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What media lasts LONGEST?

    I mean, other than paper, or stone.

    Ok, ammend. What DIGITAL media lasts longest? My first instinct is to say some type of tape, but tape drives seem to come in and go out of fashion fairly quickly. IDE drives might be another alternative...

    So, for your money, what's the best media to store backups of your digital data? Anyone, anyone?

    --
    -- The unsig...
    1. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by iansmith · · Score: 1

      I would say... ...CDs and DVDs!

      Before they start to degrade, new higher density formats will be out and you can copy your archive to that. I have backup tapes from 10 years ago that are still good, but do I care? I copied them to CD long ago... who WANTS to use 15 year old tech?

      If it sounds like too much work, then maybe tehe data isn't that important in the first place.

    2. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      who WANTS to use 15 year old tech?

      My car is 15 years old and I can't afford a new one, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Kenja · · Score: 4, Informative
      "What DIGITAL media lasts longest? My first instinct is to say some type of tape, but tape drives seem to come in and go out of fashion fairly quickly. IDE drives might be another alternative..."

      There is a reason people back up to tape even though it costs more per gigabyte then hard disks.

      This is the AIT1 spec from Sony.

      Avg. media uses: greater than 30,000
      Media archival: greater than 30 years
      Average head life: minimum 50,000 recording head contact hours
      Media drum wraps: 100,000 times
      Tape repositioning: 1,000,000 cycles

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Ralconte · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's come up before here on /. and elsewhere...no medium has perfect longevity; optical, magneto-optical, magnetic, even paper all fade in time. The solution is to make a fresh copy at regular intervals with minimal handling of the master. The goal is to maximize the duration a copy will last, so that if it gets lost for a while, it can be reclaimed. This is what librarys are always doing with books. It just sucks that CD's were touted as some sort of immortal storage format, and now, probably as a result of cost cutting, some brands won't even last a couple of years.

    5. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Wanderer2 · · Score: 1
      What DIGITAL media lasts longest?

      Radio waves beamed into space?

      Just think, in a thousand years the last episode of Single Female Lawyer will reach Omicron Persei 8 and it'll be percectly intact... oh.

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    6. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 4, Funny

      What media lasts LONGEST?

      A wife's memory can store your screw-ups for perhaps an indefinite amount of time. :) Does that count?

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    7. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by saroth2 · · Score: 1

      Mask ROM, no crappy FLASH ROM stuff, no crappy FLASH RAM stuff. I mean the good old fashioned mask ROM.

      The data on that's not goin' anywhere.

      Don't tell me bit rot, that does not apply to mask ROM, only to the crappy stuff mentioned above.

      Unfortunately the price (25 Grand+ DISCLAIMER: this figure may be way off the mark) may be an issue.

    8. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by cuzality · · Score: 1


      If "all [media] fade in time", why would you want to even attempt to preserve the "master" (the original) by handling it as little as possible?

      With CD-Rs of equal quality, the bits on any copy are the same as the master -- the only difference is the age (and therefore the breakdown) of each copy. The master is the oldest copy you have, and would be the least reliable! The most recent copy should be the "master" if any.

      Your basic point is correct, however -- "fresh [copies] at regular intervals" is the only way to make sure that the bits stay useful.

    9. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by concept14 · · Score: 1
      What DIGITAL media lasts longest? My first instinct is to say some type of tape, but tape drives seem to come in and go out of fashion fairly quickly.


      Don't count on tape even if you have an old tape drive -- the physical medium can decay. Some of the data from the 1976 Mars Viking mission is lost.
      --
      Quis metamoderunt ipses metamoderatores?
    10. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by pben · · Score: 1

      Signal to Noise Ratio is not just a phrase made up to complain about Slashdot trolls. All radio frequencies have natural noise that will destroy any possibly of getting useful information out of the signal. Enough my remain to show that the signal is artificial but at a thousand light-years you are not going to be able to watch any kind of TV from Earth. Just too may natural noise sources exist against that weak of a signal.

      If you ask me more data should be destroyed, too much is spend backing up useless crap. Human memory is great because a lot is forgotten leaving only what is really important.

    11. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by dokebi · · Score: 1

      The one thing that lasts practically forever is micro engraved alumninum plates. I think microfische (used to archive newspaper) would come close (but not fireproof). It won't be too difficult to print 2-D barcodes onto either to preserve digital data.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    12. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      wire lasts the longest. It's what airplane black boxes use. The things can be broken apart and reattached without information loss. The desity and speed sucks, but it lasts.

    13. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > What media lasts LONGEST?
      > I mean, other than paper, or stone.

      What bests paper or rock? Obviously, scissors.

      --
      -JC
      coder
      http://www.jc-news.com/parse.cgi?coding/main

    14. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      Aluminum actually oxidizes pretty severely in some conditions.

      Most aluminum we deal with is actually coated by a tough but fine layer of alumina oxide (Al2O3). Iron, when it rusts, flakes off molecules of FeO2, but aluminum clings to its layer of oxide, so it does make it pretty durable.

      But expose it to chlorine or OH- ions, and you'll get serious degradation.

      If you want chemically inert metal to etch your data into, I suggest gold. Sure, it scratches easily, but it'll be stolen and melted into jewelry long before the scratches seriously degrade your data.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    15. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Qui-Gon · · Score: 1

      If you ask me more data should be destroyed, too much is spend backing up useless crap. Human memory is great because a lot is forgotten leaving only what is really important.

      One man's trash is another man's treasure...

      --

      We are blind to the Worlds within us
      waiting to be born...
    16. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Trinition · · Score: 1

      Actually, considering we've found paper thousands of years old, paper's not too bad. Granted, the paper is degraged, has holes, dyes fade, etc. but they're still partially legible. Stone, even more so.

      The thing is, when you say digital, most people think electromagnetic. That's not what digital means, though. It means discrete values rather than an analog continuum. There were mechanical digitasl clocks that just flipped numbers over and over again. Right a series of 0 and 1s on paper is also digital. Because you only have two discrete digits, it is digital. Even with quite a bit of deterioration, you can still tell a 1 from a 0.

      Thus, I would suspect stone/paper/non-corosive-metals would all be good choices so long as the way you encode the digital information is stable and and capable of being recognizable after sustaining damage.

      As for punch cards, the problem I've heard with those is that the more edge-area exposed on paper (the inside edge of evert punched hole), the faster it degrades. Thus, stable ink on paper would be better than punched holes.

    17. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by achurch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Avg. media uses: greater than 30,000
      Media archival: greater than 30 years
      Average head life: minimum 50,000 recording head contact hours
      Media drum wraps: 100,000 times
      Tape repositioning: 1,000,000 cycles

      Sound of your tape getting mangled in the drive as you try to recover from a hard disk failure: Timeless

    18. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Dever · · Score: 1
      wire? i am ignorant of this method. how do you store information on a wire?

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    19. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even have to be a screw-up. It can just be something that pisses a woman off. Like existing in her presence against her will. Works with mothers, daughters, sisters, or cow-orkers, as well as wives.

    20. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      All I know is I have Cassette Tapes for my Commodore 64 that work fine even today, the floppy disks though.... not so lucky, the disks are fine but the data is long gone.

    21. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      nick it for one, don't nick it for zero

    22. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Spatula+Sam · · Score: 1

      If I recall records should theoretically last the longest, especially if they're printed on anything more durable than vinyl. Didn't they send a gold record into space with one of the probes with recordings of common earth sounds?

    23. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      That's not paper, that's vellum (from animal skin). you might get a few hundred years out of the right kind of paper.

    24. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by orb_fan · · Score: 1

      Easy - RAID 5

    25. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Tape is best, but is certainly not foolproof... it all depends on the how and where your data is stored.

      NASA has many, many TB of data from space probes and such archived on tape. When you maintain huge tape libraries for archival purposes, you hit a snag in that the earth's magnetic field randomizes tape over time.

      NASA uses massive tape silos (see Storagetek and IBM websites) and moves data between tapes on a regular basis.

      Keep in mind that digital storage is a very new medium with alot of disadvantages. The easy decay, deletion and modification of digital data guarantees that future historians will know little about our society in the future.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    26. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What DIGITAL media lasts longest?"

      Who says paper or stone can't be digital media? Print a hex dump, then OCR it back in. Clay tablets could be substituted, with a CAM system like a Gerber.

      Alternatively, a long lasting storage medium could be layered synthetic sintering, a process much like a laser printer that prints plastic layer by layer to make 3D objects. Lay down a thick substrate, then print a data layer thick enough to withstand the projected wear.

      But in terms of current technologies, none are really suitable as long term (>30 years) storage. Laserdiscs, 5&1/4" floppies and Syquest carts are historical relics; CDs will probably be phased out by the music industry when back-catalogue sales have reached saturation. In fact, when you think about it, DVD's back-compatablity with CDs is almost unique in storage media, digital or not.

      However, at some point some manufacturer will realize that a scanning laser, rather than a spinning disc, will allow for greater precision (& therefore data density), so I wouldn't count on shiny discs of any format lasting much more than 20 years.

      If you only want a 7 year lifespan, good quality CD-Rs are perfectly adequate when handled correctly. They must be good quality (metallic data layer, not purely organic); crap CDs with the printed-on data layer are coasters-in-waiting. Contrary to other advice, I wouldn't be too concerned by the manufacturer printing on a sandwiched-layer CD, since the paint used is not capable of exerting enough force to deform the disc in any way (the molecules in the paint just aren't that strong). Most deformed discs are caused by improper handling: the clamp that holds the CD into the full-size cases should be pressed down before removing the CD (like the handling instructions say), and slimline cases, having no zero-force release mechanism, should be avoided like the plague's ugly sister. A warped CD isn't even a good coaster, and doesn't make a good peanut bowl/ashtray because of the hole in the bottom.

      IDE drives may be cheap, but since manufacturing defects in particular models (ie Deathstars) only show up well into the production run, there is no garantee that the mechanism you bought has the longevity needed. Its also unclear whether problems like sticktion are use or age dependent, so its probably wisest to choose a medium with a minimum of moving parts built in.

      Tapes suffer wear, particle shedding (especially at high speeds), clogged or dirty heads (I am not aware of any tape technology where the tape isn't in physical contact with the heads, but I am willing to be corrected on this point), and, probably worst of all, quick obsolesence. In fact, the only tape mechanisms I can think of that have had media in constant production for more than 20 years were the ones that came with the Commodore 64 and its ilk (the humble cassette is a remarkably good, if brain-obliteratingly slow, storage medium).

      Magneto-optical drives are expensive, and therfore not too common, so you run the risk of not being able to find a playback mechanism should the need arise.

      Frankly, the only storage medium I've seen last is the good old EEPROM. Sure, they're pricey per MB, fairly easily damaged and require special equipment to write, but a modern EPROM burner will read & write chips designed 20 years ago (many of which are still in production). The big problem is that noone ever standardised a consumer package.

      Basically, backup to whatever format is most convenient, then backup your backup when another long term storage solution becomes common. And don't make the mistake of jumping on the latest thing; the Jaz drive is a lesson worth rememebering (I recall a few years ago when Iomega released a small, 40MB cart about an inch square, which they unfortunately named the "Click" drive...at least you can't accuse them of misleading advertising. And the Peerless, or should I say Purchaseless? 15,000 RPM SCSI drives were cheaper/MB.)

    27. Re:Hey here's a semi-on-topic question by wiremind · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, a long lasting storage medium could be layered synthetic sintering, a process much like a laser printer that prints plastic layer by layer to make 3D objects. Lay down a thick substrate, then print a data layer thick enough to withstand the projected wear.

      <BR>
      Ha, i kinda like that.<BR>
      <BR>
      reminds me of this article: http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/04/30/28149.htm l<BR>
      <BR>
      printing it all out would be pretty easy, trying to scan all that data back in would be a terrible job for any bulk data entry person.<BR>
      <BR>
      seriously though, 1970's card readers, we could basicly just use all that original hardware, store the data on cards about the same size, just increase the resolution of data per card. i'm just daydreaming out loud, just sayin' its really not a bad idea for long term cold storage.<BR>
      <BR>
      Kyle

  30. Old news by linuxtelephony · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is old news. I remember hearing about this back in 89 or so. The problem is worse if CDs are left out in open air, and in light. If memory serves, for longer lasting CDs, they need to be stored in the dark (not just in its case, but in a dark place like a drawer or safe).

    I also think the newer CDs are more prone to this problem than the older ones. I don't know if the materials are much different, or thinner, in order to increase writing speed, but I have noticed that my newer CDs appear to show these signs fairly quickly, sometimes as early as just a few months -- especially if I don't keep them properly stored.

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
  31. actually, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure you have the receipt, and ship it to them (them being the label).

    1. Re:actually, yes. by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I didn't even need to have a receipt. I had purchased a used cd, which subsequently bronzed. Furthermore, the disc was out of print. Arrgghh!! One of my favorites!

      Nevertheless, the manufacturer was aware of a bad batch of discs, and replaced it with a brand new shiny one. Now THAT's customer service. It's great that some companies back up their product!

  32. does this mean.... by hellmarch · · Score: 5, Funny

    that the billions of AOL cds in the world will eventually turn into something useful? like dust?

    1. Re:does this mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet.. turn your AOL CD into a coil for a crystal radio.

  33. Does your CD skip? Slashdot sure does! by iansmith · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I think this is the third, or maybe fourth story about the fact that CDs which have not been around for 100 years to do testing on, may not actually last 100 years. Duh.

    I think this is the third...

  34. next medium by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    From article:

    "I'm hoping they'll hold out till that next medium gets popular, and everyone gets to buy everything over again," he says.

    Already has, its called digital format, usually MP3. Rip them and create digital back ups and worry about the longevity of the media of your digital backups. This usually means regular backups with multiple copies to restore from. Don't forget to put a copy of your backups in your sfety deposit box or other off site safe place. (I keep a set in my car trunk and just hope nobody steals my car and reads through my files.)

    1. Re:next medium by hyc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Digital format yes, but I would not use any lossy compression like MP3 for archival purposes. I don't use MP3 for general listening either. The fact that its sampling resolution is only 26ms and the music I perform and listen to has ornaments of 50ms or less means that MP3 destroys a lot of fine detail that I worked hard to create. And yes, I can hear the difference, but that's because I am specifically listening for it.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    2. Re:next medium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I keep a set in my car trunk and just hope nobody steals my car and reads through my files

      You'd better also hope your house doesn't burn down while the car's parked in the garage.

      Weren't there some companies in the World Trade Center whose idea of an off-site backup was to put a copy of their data in the other tower?

    3. Re:next medium by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      Cantor Fitzgerald did it right. They backed up all their data every day and had it sent to their offices in Britain. Even though they lost their offices -- and tragically over 600 people -- they were able to resume working just two days later out of their international offices.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    4. Re:next medium by Dever · · Score: 1
      i listen to all kinds of music, and mess around with some here and there, but i'm just havin fun...what's an ornament? and are they usually at 50ms or thereabouts? i'm curious to know what this us about and/or what music you're referring to.

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    5. Re:next medium by hyc · · Score: 1

      I play Irish & Scottish fiddle, an ornament is something like a triplet, a grace note, or a roll that is not intrinsic to the melody but played as a variation to augment or ornament a basic note. Grace notes are little more than a flick of a finger over a string. Sometimes in classical music they're written as a 32nd or 64th note. At the tempos I usually play, that means 15-30 milliseconds; a fast 64th note would just turn into a fuzz of white noise on an MP3 track.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
  35. This is really old news but good! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It needs to be heard in more public media to get attention of the public. The geeks get the low-down way before the public does. I'm willing to bet much of it is to suppress public outcry...

    In the mean time, this opens the doors to perhaps yet another less fallible storage method. As an open-source advocate, I'm hoping some forward-thinking scientists are already cooking something up that doesn't require DRM be an inherent part of the mix.

  36. Disagree - as Janet Jackson has clearly shown! by jayveekay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, wait, the original article said immorTal, sorry, my bad. ;)

  37. My poor collection by INeededALogin · · Score: 0

    Of Mp3s are ok:-) Actually, this condition is something that pushed me away from CDs. I almost broke down and cried when I could see through my "Ok Computer" CD. I still bought the next 3 albums from Radiohead, but I immediately rip'd them.

    CDs are better than floppies, but... last forever... definitely not.

  38. whats with all the ruckus? by ashot · · Score: 1

    I can burn my mp3s as many times as I want.. =]

    --
    -ashot
  39. My observations on cd rot... by Foo2rama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All of the cd's that I have that have "rotted" or lost the metal layer that holds that data. Have been blank topped cd's ie no printing no nothing on top, just shiny metal. The cd's that I have that are labled or printed on don't seem to have any problem. I live in southern california and leave my cd's in my dark colored truck year round. Commercial Cd's and branded printed cd's seem fine as well as cd's with stickers on them.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
    1. Re:My observations on cd rot... by Bobman1235 · · Score: 1

      All of the CDs I have that have had CD rot have been pressed commercial CDs, same situation - left in the sun one too many times in one of those case logic holder doodads (although admittedly in New England, not So. Cal.) I've never had this issue with burned CDs, blank or otherwise. Not ot suggest it's not a problem on burned CDs, just that from my experience it can be equally probably to happen with a pressed commercial CD.

  40. Music Companies in Trouble... by Kjuib · · Score: 0

    I say we send all the "rotted" cds back to the Music Companies and demand a Refund. If I paid for Near Immortal Music... then I want New Immortal Music - 15 years is not Near Immortal.

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
  41. So which lasts longer... by dpilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CD or the copyright?

    One of the things that's bugged me is that AFAIK, CSS and the like have NO provisions whatsoever for copyright expiration. I guess the ??AA can use this as a reason for never having any.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:So which lasts longer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up parent!

    2. Re:So which lasts longer... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is a troll, or if there is another meaning for CSS I wasn't previously aware of.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:So which lasts longer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Those Cascading Style Sheets are evil, man! They're taking away fair use!

    4. Re:So which lasts longer... by hyc · · Score: 1

      Bingo. This fact alone makes the DMCA unconstitutional. By the time the copyright expires, the material will be legitimately copyable but developing the technology to copy it will still be illegal.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
  42. FUD ALERT! by btlzu2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You may have not been doing this for malicious reasons, but you're statement is inaccurate! :)

    According to Apple's site you can write songs an unlimited amount of times. You can only write a specific PLAYLISTS X amount of times. I think it's 5.

    I have burned songs to CDs quite a few times and never had a problem. I've made at least 20 backups of my music collection, including purchased AACs.

    iTunes has a very fair and very liberal usage policy IMO.

    --
    Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    1. Re:FUD ALERT! by jb_davis · · Score: 0

      Fair = no restrictions Fairplay = DRM Prison Rape

      --
      "Well, it took an hour to write, I thought it would take an hour to read."
    2. Re:FUD ALERT! by btlzu2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I understand some people have that view (by best friend for example, and we've had LONG arguments about it), but I'm not that extreme. Especially in this case with Apple. Apple shines compared to Microsoft in this topic.

      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    3. Re:FUD ALERT! by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      According to Apple's site you can write songs an unlimited amount of times.
      And Apple should know, the Beatles got away with this repetative song stuff for fifteen years.

    4. Re:FUD ALERT! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      no, there is a limmit!!!take the number of songs you have, multiply each spot on a CD by that number -n where n is the position in the list you are starting at zero, next multiply that by n! and finally multiply that by 7

      that is how many times any one song can be burned to CD...most certainly NOT unlimited....but it is a hell of a lot, even if you only had 10 songs.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:FUD ALERT! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      no, fair = good enough for everyone,

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:FUD ALERT! by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please remember, Best does not always equal good. When I was a mechanic, working the night shift, out on the tarmac for eight hours, in the rain, up 65 feet in the air to change a position light on the top of the vertical fin of a 747, I used to think that anybody who worked indoors had NO right to complain about their jobs. It actually took me eight years of nice cushy work in the editing room and master control to realize how wrong I was. Possibly bad analogy, but my point is that ANY DRM, no matter how weak, is not good. It may seem acceptable now, but down the road there will be trouble. It's the old slippery slope routine. It starts out voluntary, but becomes mandatory later. Please don't support it. If you need music that badly, buy from independants, or whistle, or sing. Don't buy DRM. It virtually killed the minidisk for all practical purposes, and did the same to DAT. It will make your computer useless for anything but a purchasing appliance from BIGCO.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:FUD ALERT! by Graff · · Score: 1
      take the number of songs you have, multiply each spot on a CD by that number -n where n is the position in the list you are starting at zero, next multiply that by n! and finally multiply that by 7

      that is how many times any one song can be burned to CD...most certainly NOT unlimited....but it is a hell of a lot, even if you only had 10 songs.

      It resets every time you make a new playlist so it is unlimited. All you have to do is make a playlist, copy all the songs into it, burn, make a different playlist, copy all the songs from the first playlist into the new one, burn, etc.

      Again, it's not intended to stop people from burning disks, just to slow down and annoy anyone who wants to copy a CD a few hundred times. That way those people won't use iTunes to copy things a hundred times and Apple can't be blamed for any misuse of the free tools it provides.
    8. Re:FUD ALERT! by btlzu2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, a couple questions.

      1) Do you think it's fair to share music created by someone with everyone without their permission?

      2) Do you think that the market would accept a case where it got to the point that you're locked into purchasing appliance from BIGCO? Isn't that why Linux/BSD are doing so well because even Microsoft can't make EVERYONE use their OS?

      The reason why people, informed people at least, are buying from Apple is because their current policy is acceptable and very unlimiting unless you're a pirate. If their policy changed for the worse or if Microsoft got their way and took the market share, I would no longer buy it.

      I think there's a point where the market finds conditions acceptable and where those in the market do not have to take an altruistic, idealistic stance *in case* something bad will happen. However, there is a point where a fight is in order, ala Microsoft.

      Interesting discussion!

      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    9. Re:FUD ALERT! by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Do you think it's fair to share music created by someone with everyone without their permission?
      Hardly a relevant question - the parent poster was arguing against having DRM restrictions applied, noting that "the industry" would try to increase those restrictions as far as possible. In addition, you can legally share music with others under various circumstances - a private performance, selling the media on, etc. without the permission of the writer/musician/singer (the doctrine of first sale).
      Do you think that the market would accept a case where it got to the point that you're locked into purchasing appliance from BIGCO?
      Hmmm...ever tried buying a PC without a copy of Windows preinstalled? While some vendors will allow it, the vast majority will not which seems pretty close to market lock-in. Linux/BSD's success is, it can be argued, as much to do with their non-commercial nature as Windows' many flaws (since no sensible company would consider going head-to-head with Microsoft - even IBM had to give up on OS/2 - and those that do come up with innovative alternatives could either be bought up or squeezed out).

      Ironically, Microsoft's ruthless domination of the commercial market (pushing out OS/2 and BeOS) may be seen as having been of great benefit to Linux/BSD, since it left them as the only alternative. But now I'm starting to ramble...

    10. Re:FUD ALERT! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I think that it's vital for ALL information to be shared, completely and openly. People should be compensated for perforance of said works, not for selling useless copies. I'm not the only person who thinks that way, and I've posted plenty of times on this subject(If you're a subscriber, you can check at your convenience.) Re-stating it here is just redundant, but if you insist, I can.(If I can remember what I posted.)

      So far, that's because the gov't doesn't force us to buy MS stuff. If they want to, they might be able to spin it in such a way that people would accept those requirements. Think terrorists and kiddie porn.

      Many companies use "piracy" to achieve market saturation. They also scapegoat it to justify their ridiculous prices. MS is the best example of this. Adobe is another. Hollywood?... well, you already know that one. Piracy is that little bird on society's back, picking off the ticks and fleas. It's weird to think that most of our progress as a society was brought to us through criminal behavior.

      Apple and MS already own a piece of each other, so, in reality, there might not be as much competition as I'd like to see. We're choosing the lessor of two evils(Hmmm...Where have we heard that tired old statement before. Every four years...I think.) No matter how or where we spend our money, MS is probably making a few pennies for every dollar.

      --
      What?
    11. Re:FUD ALERT! by btlzu2 · · Score: 1

      I think that it's vital for ALL information to be shared, completely and openly.
      Ok, so you're most likely fully in the RMS philosophical camp and I guess what I have to say is thank you for being a balance because you guys offset the extreme other side, (ie Microsoft, etc.) and I (being in the middle) benefit from your fighting.

      I still say that being able to burn a song to CD as many times as I want for as long as I want is not a restriction. The biggest restriction is that I cannot send a song I bought to my friends, but I can burn them a CD of those songs to listen to whenever they want, therefore, information is free. I have a slight moral issue with that, however, because I think my friends should buy their own damn music.

      I disagree with you, but now I understand your viewpoint better. I have other things I consider more important and therefore, I can't be quite as zealous as you about this issue. I will become more zealous when it I consider it a problem, but for now, I really don't.

      I understand that companies and big-wigs do immoral things; however, I also accept that that is the way of the world and that humankind will always do that. It doesn't mean that me being able to legally buy $0.99 songs and do what I wish with them will affect that one way or the other.

      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    12. Re:FUD ALERT! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Life's too short for this tired old brain to comprehend RMS. Maybe it's all those fancy, expensive words he uses.

      By the time it becomes a problem to you, it might be too late to stop it.(you know...First they came after...blah blah blah) I may seem zealous about it because the war is off topic.(If you want to see zealous that would start it)

      Actually, because we're talking about entertainment here, I shouldn't be so zealous. It's so damn trivial, but there are underlying problems that need to be resolved.

      --
      What?
    13. Re:FUD ALERT! by FLEB · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about unique-ID watermarking?

      Personally, I'd really like to see more development in that area. If online music retailers could have a good, solid, yet audibly insignificant watermarking scheme, it would allow them to track down infringers, while still leaving the music wide open to legal uses. Furthermore, seeing a few pirates getting legal-blasted for distributing their watermarked works could be a decent deterrant. It's a win-win.

      In reply to some other posts, I disagree with applying the "Information should be free" idea to music. It's not "information", it's a product. Information is already free (in the US), thanks to fair use laws. You are no more "informed" by hearing a fair-use-friendly synopsis of a song than by possessing the actual song. The fact that an item is intangible or copyable does not mean that it does not take time and energy to produce.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    14. Re:FUD ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've made at least 20 backups of my music collection, including purchased AACs.

      Each and everyone a legit backup, I imagine.

      I usually create a couple of thousand backups myself. You can never be too safe!

    15. Re:FUD ALERT! by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      iminplaya - agree 100% with your analysis.

      Microsoft's latest DRM offering, 'Janus', is snakeoil. Everyone will end up buying it to solve their problems, and the vast majority of us will suffer as a result.

      I am particularly worried about accessing copyrighted material for fair use...if an author otherwise wants you to use their work, but decides to use Janus to control distribution of 'one and only one' copy - then that author just denied access to everyone using open source OSs. Windows becomes the defacto standard - and Linux once again has another reason why its 'not ready for the desktop'.

      Microsoft is a monopoly, and will continue to use that power to shut down the little guys.

      I don't know about the rest of you, but I am sick of Bill Gates telling me (scratch that - forcing on me) that he knows what is best for me. The really infuriating thing about this is that it is unavoidable, and becoming more so with each passing rollout of Microsoft products; if I want to interact with my non-technical friends - either via sharing documents, playing popular online video games, or sharing music - it gets thrown in my face. I can't blame my friends - they don't have the technical savvy to manage a Linux machine - and are even more less inclined to be satisfied with the encircling noose that is Microsoft.

      Perhaps when I get older, and only want to write my memoirs, it won't bother me as much.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    16. Re:FUD ALERT! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      I've made at least 20 backups of my music collection

      Wow... I bet "anal" doesn't even begin to describe you... unless your music collection fits in one CD :)

    17. Re:FUD ALERT! by btlzu2 · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Not all at once. Over time. Doesn't anyone make regular backups of their data?

      If you did get to know me you'd know I'm the opposite of anal except when it comes to my music! :) I'm a slob otherwise unfortunately.

      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
  43. CD's Deteriorating???? by regjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh great....now my whole AOL free trial collection will be ruined!

    --
    Indecision may, or may not be my problem! -- Jimmy Buffett
  44. Yes but...the name is perfect by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Did you notice the name of the guy on the article with 200 rotted CDs?

    Dan KOSTER.

    is that perhaps with a soft "O", like "Coaster". I'd say so. He should change his middle name to "2000".

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Yes but...the name is perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he is KDE developer.

    2. Re:Yes but...the name is perfect by NegativeCreep · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and did you notice the picture of the guy? His CD's were probably stored in the back of his white van with no windows... the one down by the river...

    3. Re:Yes but...the name is perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to work that hard for a joke, it's probably a bad idea.

  45. Dupe! by gears5665 · · Score: 1

    This is a dupe!

  46. tin foil by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 1

    Ok, I've got my tin foil hat on for this one.
    Is it possible that they are intentionally degrading the quality of CDs?
    Soon to come out with a new "longer lasting" format with DRM.

    1. Re:tin foil by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

      Be careful buddy, if your CD's aluminium is getting rotten, your tin foil hat may too !

  47. Tell me about it. by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    I just unwrapped a 10 pack of CD-RWs I purchased 2 years ago. The failure rate is about 50%. I keep getting Track Following Errors or Bad Block errors. Tried burning with a Yamaha 3200s and my Thinkpad CDRW. Errors are given both under 2000 and different Linux distros.

    Nice to see the price I paid for these went towards QA.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  48. CD rot is not scary.. but the guy holding it is! by iansmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    When that beard turns white he will make a great Gandolf though.

  49. My own conclusions by value_added · · Score: 1

    1. If any of your CDs are damaged, it's probably your girlfriend's fault. Or someone else's girlfriend. We all know girlz don't know how to handle CDs (or LPs for that matter), right?

    2. If you live in Oregon and insist on living in a cabin "heated by a wood-burning stove", leave your CDs elsewhere. Maybe with your girlfriend.

    3. The RIAA has less to worry about than they thought.

  50. archives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does slashdot keep its archived stories on CDs?

    Due to the number of dupes I'm beginning to think so.

  51. Nah, we already have a system by Atario · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Consumers have adopted a system by which multiple redundant backups are constantly made and remade.

    It's called P2P.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Nah, we already have a system by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      And new media formats are embraced not maligned.

  52. Not sure why this suprises anyone by tgd · · Score: 1

    Laser rot has been a known significant problem with laserdiscs since the early 80's.

    I've only got one or two CDs I've found with rot, but a number of laserdiscs do.

    Annoying.

    I bought a CDR back in 1996 or so ($1k for a 1x CDR drive!)... ironically all the CDR's I burned back then I can still read, but I've got several DVD-R's that have already gone bad in less than a year, and a good number of more recent cheap-o CDR discs that have gone bad.

    Moral is, rot happens, and buy the higher end discs for important stuff.

    1. Re:Not sure why this suprises anyone by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      I wonder why it's not more prevalent than it is on cds, given the important layer is less protected than in an LD. (but the LD is probably a lot more sensitive to manufacturing conditions, consider how they're made.)

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  53. Vinyl lasts the longest by tentimestwenty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'll find 60 or 70 year old records that sound and play just fine. There is next to no deterioration of either the sleeve or the record if they're stored and unplayed. I'd imagine the lifespan would easily be hundreds of years. Sure, you get some deterioration in the form of clicks and pops but you'll never get a complete failure like a digital or even magnetic medium. Now that MP3-for-pay is coming of age, finding a stable medium is going to be a top priority for the average person. Heck, most people don't even backup their hard drives and duping CD-Rs is time consuming and wasteful.

    1. Re:Vinyl lasts the longest by jpr1nd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed, from now on, I'll back up all of my important data to vinyl.

    2. Re:Vinyl lasts the longest by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      How many albums do you think you'll need to bach up that 160gig hard drive? :-)

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Vinyl lasts the longest by tarogue · · Score: 1

      Except that vinyl is analog, and the question was regarding digital media...

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all. -- Thomas J. Kopp
    4. Re:Vinyl lasts the longest by jazzer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You'll find 60 or 70 year old records that sound and play just fine. There is next to no deterioration of either the sleeve or the record if they're stored and unplayed. I'd imagine the lifespan would easily be hundreds of years.
      So if I don't listen to the music then it will last hundreds of year, great.
      Sure, you get some deterioration in the form of clicks and pops but you'll never get a complete failure like a digital or even magnetic medium
      Those clicks and pops on a Hi-fi music system are untolerable.
      Now that MP3-for-pay is coming of age, finding a stable medium is going to be a top priority for the average person. Heck, most people don't even backup their hard drives and duping CD-Rs is time consuming and wasteful.
      However, mp3's are never of high enough quality to play on a Hi-fi system. Why is it that nobody on Slashdot cares about audio quality? You would think on a website about computers & technology that their interest in technology would go further than just the computer.
    5. Re:Vinyl lasts the longest by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      You'll find 60 or 70 year old records that sound and play just fine.

      The moral of the story? Store all your important data on vinyl! Reading the data is easy if you hook up your phonograph to the cassette port of your Commodore PET!

      At ~600bps data transfer rate and ~25 minutes per LP side, it only requires 5,000 discs per gigabyte!

  54. Agreed by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    Yeah, tis is pretty old news. For years I have noticed the silver part of the CD's, if held up to light, you could see through parts as if the part with the data on it just vanished. I guess that whole "Liftime" thing meant the lifetime of the CD. Sneaky. Oh well, at least my MP3's are a bit more persistant.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  55. Quit posting dupes!!! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    I don't know about ya'll /. news posters. This story (or at least very similar ones) has (or have) been posted so many times in the past few years that I'm getting really sick of hearing about it.

    I'm not going to bother searching for the links to prove what I'm saying here, but rest assured it's true. I've read about fungus eating away the recorded surface, impurities in the manufacturing of the CDs, and many other weird problems that will cause CDs to rot ten days after purchase.

  56. When did they argue that? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't recall a "license" ever coming in to it.

    I thought their argument is simply that as copyright holder they are the only people entitled to create copies outside of "fair use".

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:When did they argue that? by josh3736 · · Score: 1
      I thought their argument is simply that as copyright holder they are the only people entitled to create copies outside of "fair use".

      Nah, the copyright holder is the only person entitled to create copies.

      ...period.

    2. Re:When did they argue that? by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... My BS-ometer seems to jump when it gets close to the parent.... Wonder why?

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    3. Re:When did they argue that? by josh3736 · · Score: 1
      It was (an obviously bad attempt at) a joke.

      Obviously bad since it requires that I point out that it was a joke.

      Ah well, back to bed...

  57. Highlander? by Scrab · · Score: 1

    Why do I now have an image of a CD with a huge sword yelling "There can be only one" on a hillside in Scotland?

    --
    RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
  58. Clicks and pops not complete failure!? by Animaether · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You do realize that those clicks and pops when dealing with digital data means exactly that, right ?
    it's okay for audio to have a click here and there - heck, that's how audio CDs deal with tiny scratches.. there's a small level of redundancy.

    data is a whole different arena.

    1. Re:Clicks and pops not complete failure!? by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

      My point was in relation to recognition of the whole. A picture on a piece of paper remains intact and useful as a picture on a piece of paper for hundreds of years even if it has minor blemishes. Corrupt the directory on a CD, or even part of an important file even slightly and it's likely you've lost the content in its entirety. Vinyl's just an example for audio, which is the angle the article took.

  59. Dup? by Lust · · Score: 1

    Similar to an older story?

  60. 300 CDs uncompressed on one hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So my CDs will rot. I have a perfect, jitter-free bit-for-bit copy of each one on my hard drive. If CD rots, discard and re-burn.

    Voila

  61. quick! by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    backup to tape!

    (ah, they all come back into the fold...)

    CBVS

  62. [slightly] OT: Fair Use Question by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    So, I think most slashdotters agree that it is fair use to rip music CDs that I own to MP3, ogg, or whatever I find more convenient.

    My question is this - what if some miscreant makes off with my original CD, and all I am left with is my MP3 copy?

    I'm I still covered under "fair use" or did the thief make off with my fair use license too?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  63. Don't worry by lightspawn · · Score: 1

    Not only is this article a dupe and also a dupe, according to popular site slashdot, CDs may be phased out in less than 5 years.

  64. Old news... by Imidazole · · Score: 0

    Why is it that this is covered every 6-8 months on every single news site? Old news, we know already... get over it...

  65. The press has a good day by hhg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NYT discovers IRC, CNN discovers CD-Rot. I'll bet the next thing that happens is that Al Gore discovers the Internet.

    Seriously, though, this explains why the american congress is pushing all the ideas of the MPAA and the RIAA, they really don't know what is about to hit them. And CNN is certainly not going to tell them this time, as it seems.

  66. Toddler proofing? by x3ro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll only count a digital medium as immortal when it can stand up the punishment my 2-year old regularly inflicts on my CD collection. Titanium platter maybe? ...

    --
    [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
    1. Re:Toddler proofing? by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Solution: Put the CD's where your 2-year old can't get to them, eg on a higher shelf.

      Works for me.

  67. what about CDR color by ejaw5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone know if the color and opacity of the CDR disk have an effect on durability?

    Its been my observation that the darker blue medium and opaque CDRs work better than ligher colored (more silver) and more transparent ones. I think the Verbatim's from the 1x/2x/4x days are the best: Deep blue medium, yellow/gold/green recorded region, and the top layer was thick and not prone to be scratched off like today's CDRs.

    Using this logic..CDR media gets worse as recording speed of drives are pushed faster. But I haven't found quantative data to back this up.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  68. Soviet Russia by hhg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, the CD Rots you!

  69. Cowboy Neal submitted this story! by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1


    Wow, like Snake Plissken, I thought you were dead! (according to what a few people posted in a different thred today on Slashdot)...I'm glad to see the rumors of your demise were greatly exaggerated... :)

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  70. Thankfully by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    Thankfully most of the RIAA sanctioned crap blasted over the radio and Empty-V will not be playable in a few years. Then again, with most of this crap it was not intended for it to be listened to for more than 6 months anyways. The quicker we can cleanse ourselves of this, the better off we will be. But then again, this won't allow future generations learn from our past mistakes in ,cough "art" cough, and thus be doomed to repeat it. Then again, we save ourselves the embarrasement of being associated with this junk.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  71. Why is this news? by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    Hey, another CD rot story. Any one else getting a little tired of the crap that passes for news on slashdot lately?

  72. WTF ever happened to Jon Katz, anyway? by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think he went the way of the Internet Stock Boom....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:WTF ever happened to Jon Katz, anyway? by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Uh, well, every god damn article he wrote attracted an endless stream of flames and criticism.
      I wouldn't be surprised if he left of his own accord. Then again, Taco may well have gotten rid of him. Ad revenue crashed with the dotcoms, so it makes sense to cut down costs.

    2. Re:WTF ever happened to Jon Katz, anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I believe he just got a LiveJournal.

  73. Well, now that we know they don't last forever... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    ...I'm sure that the RIAA will begin immediately reducing prices!

    Weaselmancer

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  74. They meant to say... by I_am_Syrinx · · Score: 1

    that CD's are immortal, but for a limited time.

    --
    Shadows on the road behind, shadows on the road ahead...
  75. My thoughts exactly, dude. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    I actually miss Katz. His articles were interesting, if not outright fun to read sometimes (in a sort of "wtf?" kind of way).

  76. Product Returns by Bruha · · Score: 1

    So this 5,000 dollar DVD collection I have may be rotting.

    Great becuase I doubt if any go bad I'll be able to get them replaced. This could get expensive.

  77. Punched Cards by DrInequality · · Score: 1
    Punched cards would have to be the longest lasting digital media.

    Problems are keeping the stack ordered and finding a punched card reader these days...

    1. Re:Punched Cards by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Punch Cards: All it takes is one family of mice...

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  78. This has been known for *ages*. by sbaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The phenomenon of CD-Rot has been known for at least 15 years.

    I believe it comes about when there are microscopic pin-holes in the aluminium layer within the CD. Over time, an effect akin to surface-tension in liquids causes these holes to grow - until they get sufficiently large (and numerous) to cause enough data dropout to overwhelm the error correction mechanisms of the player.

    CD's that never had pin-holes don't develop them later - which explains how come some disks are magically immune to the problem where others die in only a few years.

    I once heard that you can actually see these pin-holes once they've grown to a size that's not yet large enough to cause permenant errors. Hold the disk up to a bright light and see if you can see them. This may give you time to back up one that's "on the way out" before you lose it completely.

    I believe the manufacturers developed an alternative material for the reflective layer about 10 years ago - but most pressing plants have not switched over to it. I wonder whether their reluctance to do so is rooted in a desire to have people re-buy the same CD's over and over.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
    1. Re:This has been known for *ages*. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
      " The phenomenon of CD-Rot has been known for at least 15 years.

      Which coincidentally is when this story was posted on Slashdot for the first time.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:This has been known for *ages*. by vix86 · · Score: 1

      I once heard that you can actually see these pin-holes once they've grown to a size that's not yet large enough to cause permenant errors. Hold the disk up to a bright light and see if you can see them. This may give you time to back up one that's "on the way out" before you lose it completely.

      I'm not sure if this is the same thing, but I have some CDs I burned about 2 or 3 years ago. I took them out about a month ago and noticed I could see the monitor screen through the CD. It was so bad I could read lettering and everything through the CD itself and when I burned them I vaguely remember not being able to do that, so something tells me the data probably isn't on those CDs any longer.

  79. And the "Number of times" answer is!!! by AltGrendel · · Score: 1
    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  80. The Article is NOT About CD-Rs by cft_128 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The article is about normal CDs and DVDs, the ones that the RI/MPAA wants us to buy and not make backups of. I know this article is a bit of a dupe but it is not the old CD-R suck so bad they are unreadable before the burn is finished.

    I now have a dream that congress will use this to realize that we need our fair use back. I'm not holding my breath.

    --

    Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  81. CD Rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a problem with one or two (apparently) poorly manufactured CDs that have metal flaking off of them. I can tell where it is in each track when the laser hits a spot without aluminum backing. That's where there's a "blip" noise. Actually, they're both from the Decca London label. Not a bad label music-wise, but they sure use a crumby process to mass-produce their cd's. Otherwise, I have CD's that are over a decade old, and they play just as well as the day I got them, as far as I can tell. I doubt that tapes could really do as well. In any case, I've wondered if perhaps I could fix some of the defective cd's by spraying them with a reflective paint or something. Pity, but the classical muzak I listen to is likely to be available in all sorts of recordings, so it's no great loss. I'm more careful with my 2 Melodiya CD's, though. The recordings may still be available, but they're probably pretty hard to find.

  82. and you guys *pop* laughed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    when *click* i said *pop* lp's were *click* cooler.

  83. How long should I trust my DVD-R? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of my old CDs are unplayable now, but that's because they've had beer poured on them and have been stacked outside the case in stacks of 50 for months at a time. I think some of my CD-Rs from 97 will still play.

    Anyway, now I'm burning *a lot* of DVD-Rs to fair use archive my favorite TV shows (about 1-2 discs per day, sometimes more). I'm being very careful to keep them in a case all the time, away from dust, not touching them, and I probably won't play them all that much.

    I will probably buy a storage server of super cheap hard drives 2-3 TB in a couple years, plus I will probably copy them to higher density media again in a couple years. I'm spending about $0.70/DVD now, and I expect I'll end up with a couple or three hundred DVDs of TV (we'll have high-def on demand soon enough).

    I just hope these DVDs last at least 2 years with good care, away from dust and light. Is that reasonable?

    1. Re:How long should I trust my DVD-R? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, now I'm burning *a lot* of DVD-Rs to fair use archive my favorite TV shows (about 1-2 discs per day, sometimes more). I'm being very careful to keep them in a case all the time, away from dust, not touching them, and I probably won't play them all that much.

      It's possible to add recovery data to video DVDs using QuickPar.

      Leave about 200-400MB free in the VIDEO_TS folder on your hard-drive when you author (so shoot for 4GB worth of VOBs). Use QuickPar to add PAR2 recovery data to protect all of the files in the VIDEO_TS folder, using a block size of 1024MB or 2048MB. Then burn the VIDEO_TS folder contents plus the PAR2 to the DVD.

      Some folks move the PAR2 data out of the VIDEO_TS folder, but the few DVD players that I've used don't complain if I leave the PAR2 data in the VIDEO_TS folder. (Which makes it easier to verify the contents of the disc if the PAR2 files are in the VIDEO_TS folder.)

      Yeah, it's a bit of work and you can't use the built-in burning software with most DVD authoring packages. But the end-result is worth it when your DVD disc gets scratched down the road.

  84. Features Not as Great as Touted? by philovivero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Never! Remember when DVDs came out?

    DVDs have so much storage space, that every movie will have three soundtracks of your choice, seventeen language selections, and every key scene will be shot at six angles and you can choose which angle you want to watch it in!

    Meanwhile, back in the Real World, DVDs still come with a single soundtrack, two or three languages (if you're lucky -- my Mandarin Chinese-speaking wife must get DVDs from Taiwan, *NOT* from Wal-Mart down the street), and sometimes a deleted scene or two, but *NEVER* alternate-angle scenes or anything like it.

    Now we find out they don't last very long, and you gotta keep buying the same movies, CDs, etc every decade because they only last for a few years?

    Surprise! You've been had. Again.

    But don't worry. You can believe them when they say DRM won't lock you out of your media. And they won't change the terms of service on their DRM after you've already purchased the media, like Apple did.

    Trust them.

    1. Re:Features Not as Great as Touted? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      You can believe them when they say DRM won't lock you out of your media. And they won't change the terms of service on their DRM after you've already purchased the media, like Apple did.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but Apple changed the DRM policy on newly purchased songs, not on the songs you have already purchased. I'm not sure if iTunes 4.5 would allow you to burn previously-purchased songs 10 times (as opposed to the new limit of 7), but I'm pretty sure you can avoid upgrading iTunes to keep the old deal.

      Personally, I don't know why Apple changed that limit. It's not as if people would really be using iTunes to mass produce CDs whether the limit is 10 or 7. It might have to do with getting the record labels to agree to expanding the number of authorized machines from 3 to 5. In any case, I believe you are free not to upgrade iTunes.

  85. Yeah, but they still age more gracefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    than the music that's on them.

  86. Re:CD rot is not scary.. but the guy holding it is by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

    Given he's pretty short, and goes by the nickname "Half" then I was thinking more like a hobbit/wizard hybrid.

    Hi Mark :^)

  87. It's pretty Sad by dark404 · · Score: 1

    When someone describes any limitation on their existing fair use rights as a "very fair and very liberal usage policy."

    1. Re:It's pretty Sad by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      tell you what... you sit down and start burning your songs o your hearts content. when you run into a point that no matter where in the playlist you put that song you can not make a CD, come back and tell us and we will bitch...IF we are not already dead first... fact is that you can burn a song so many times that you would have to sit at your computer day after day for the rest of your life to exhaust all the permutations possible. that is assuming though that you have a music library larger than 10 songs.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:It's pretty Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Man, you're a moron.

      If you want to burn your music using iTunes, you have to play by their rules. If you want to download music from iTunes, you have to play by their rules. If you want to use something else, that's fine. It's not a limitation on your rights -- it's a limitation on what you can do with iTunes! Their software, their rules.

      It's not like it's an unreasonable lock in -- you don't have to use iTunes to listen to, or burn, music. It's not mandated by the government. It's just one program, and it isn't even that common. Jesus, a lot of you people on slashdot are some whiney motherfucking babies.

    3. Re:It's pretty Sad by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Please tell me what fair use right iTMS violates. You can burn a song you download as many times you like.

      Finkployd

    4. Re:It's pretty Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's just one program, and it isn't even that common. Jesus, a lot of you people on slashdot are some whiney motherfucking babies."

      I agree 100%.

      It reminds of the people who will knee-jerk and defend Apple no matter how stupid they act. Kind of like.... oh.. Wait... Never mind.

    5. Re:It's pretty Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can burn a song you download as many times you like"

      What happens when I want to sell the song?

    6. Re:It's pretty Sad by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Burn it to a CD, sell the CD, delete the original.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    7. Re:It's pretty Sad by alannon · · Score: 1

      You mis-understand 'Fair Use', which is pretty common. There is no such thing as a 'violation' of fair use. Fair Use guidelines are a list of actions that you cannot be sued or charge for that would normally be actionable. They are not rights of yours that can be violated.

      For example, a public library may have a policy that prevents you from photo-copying more than 5 pages of a particular work, even though you may be able to copy more than that while still falling under fair use guidelines. The library is not violating 'fair use' by preventing this.

      Now, on to computer copies.
      Suppose you purchased a shiny new game on CD and wanted to back it up. Supposing the game had no copy protection, you could copy the game to make a backup of it, and that would fall under fair use guidelines.
      And here's where it breaks down.
      If your shiny new game had copy protection on it, and you somehow circumvented that copy protection in order to make a backup that the fair use guidelines allows you to, if you were in the US of A, you would be in violation of the DMCA because you circumvented a copy-control device, even though the fair use guidelines allow you to make your backup. DVDs have the same problem. If you decrypt the data stream to make a backup, you are in violation of the DMCA.

      Make sense? No? Good. Doesn't to me either. Write a letter to your government representatives explaining this and ask them to help repeal the DMCA.

    8. Re:It's pretty Sad by finkployd · · Score: 1

      "I" understand fair use, the grandparent poster didn't.

      The DMCA is where it breaks down, but if the DMCA didn't exist, companies would still be able to create systems that attempted to restrict fair use. Those systems just would not be protected by law.

      Finkployd

  88. A thought by tekiegreg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the article mentions what happens if the CD were left in hotter conditions persistently. However could leaving CD's in colder conditions (such as refrigerating or freezing) the CD do anything to preserve it? Just a thought...

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:A thought by DiscoDave_25 · · Score: 1

      Sort of.... I used to work as a DJ when I was at college and the CDs that were used naturally were covered in beer and scratches till eventually they wouldn't play. To get around this we used to put the CD in a freezer overnight and then take them out in the morning and use a fine grain cutting compound (T Cut Metallic as I recall) to remove any light scratches that built up and they were fine and dandy after that. Sometimes even freezing improved the CD (though the physics eludes me as to why)

    2. Re:A thought by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      However could leaving CD's in colder conditions (such as refrigerating or freezing) the CD do anything to preserve it? Just a thought...

      Spontaneous chemical reactions proceed more quickly at higher temperatures. This includes those reactions which degrade the discs. Similarly, such reactions will be slowed by low temperatures. However, there is a caveat--exposing the discs to extremes in temperature will cause thermal expansion and contraction. The plastic will also be more brittle at low temperatures. As you lower the storage temperature, you're trading mechanical damage for chemical decay; there's probably an optimum point, but finding it would require a significant effort.

      Aside: very warm storage conditions (a car in the summer sun, for example) are the worst of both worlds--accelerated chemical decay, plus physical stress up to warping and even melting. CD-Rs are also photosensitive, so keep them out of the sun!

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  89. Great, so what do we do about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I saw this site: http://store.mam-a-store.com/ which has "archival" type of CDs. How good are these? The site claims it has special CDs with special coatings, improved dyes, and even a water-based marking pen to label them. Does this stuff work? It does seem that plain old CompUSA recordables won't last very long, especially if they are marked with a Sharpie, which is what we all do. If I have files that I want to last for many years, what should I do with them? ---------- Free mobile porn

  90. All this by Trogre · · Score: 1

    ... and it's still prohibited by law to make backup copies of your CDs/DVDs in New Zealand.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  91. Funny Quote at Article's End... by Geiger581 · · Score: 1

    "I'm hoping they'll hold out till that next medium gets popular, and everyone gets to buy everything over again," he says.

    Get is a very interesting word choice. I'm just waiting for the class action lawsuit over this in a few years. It could finally be the death knell of the major labels. There have been so many billions of dollars spent in the last two decades for optical disk media, virtually everyone will be pissed when it dies.

    Personally, I'm hoping that U.S. copyright will someday be reverted to its original sub-two-decade term, concordance with European laws be damned.

    1. Re:Funny Quote at Article's End... by lithandie · · Score: 1
      But we already own a copy of the song. Why do we need to buy it over again? Didn't the Recording industry get our money once already? or even twice if you had a cassette collection and maybe even three times if you had it on LP?

      There should be a class action suit or something.

  92. Ask NIST by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As I posted on another discussion a long time ago, I attended a DVD Conference some two years ago. One of the tours featured was of NIST. They have carried out extensive testing of CDs (and related versions of that medium) to determine reliability. The weird thing is, for some reason, they wouldn't publish the result. I asked why, but I forget what it was.

    When they are using taxpayer money to do the tests, I don't see why the results (1) can't be disclosed and (2) shouldn't be disclosed (we paid for it!).

    1. Re:Ask NIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  93. One idea by anonicon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having thought about this problem, I think I came up with a decent solution to cover my ass. I normally rip my CDs to wav and mp3 files as soon as I open the CD. The mp3s go to my portable player for playing, the wavs to a 2nd hard drive for home use, and the CDs back into their cases.

    While neither CDs, DVDs nor hard drives last forever, having the .wavs in a hard-drive backup means the only way I will ever lose any music (outside of crime or catastrophe) is if the CDs and hard drive all die together before I can replace them. It could happen, but the odds are against it.

    This is off-topic, but I'm also looking forward to the day when portable players have advanced to the 400gb-1 terabyte storage level so that encoding in lossy formats like AAC, MP3, or WMA aren't necessary. Plain old wavs with their higher fidelity, boo-yah! One can dream, :-)

    Peace.

    1. Re:One idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try FLAC for non-lossy compression of WAV files...

    2. Re:One idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having the .wavs in a hard-drive backup means the only way I will ever lose any music (outside of crime or catastrophe) is if the CDs and hard drive all die together before I can replace them. It could happen, but the odds are against it.

      Let's say your hard disk fails. If the CDs were still good at that moment in time, then I agree you'll probably be fine for a day or so until you get a new hard disk and restore from CD.

      But do you really know on a daily or even weekly basis if your CDs are still good? Are you testing them? Or are you waiting until the hard disk fails to find out?

      In other words, your media don't have to fail "together", as you say, to get screwed. One could fail a long time ago by just sitting on the shelf and you wouldn't know it until it was too late. Unless you're testing both daily or weekly or something very disciplined like that.

  94. CDs might fail... by mabu · · Score: 2, Funny

    but Old Slashdot Stories seem to never decay.

  95. The real problem. by MacFury · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have no issue with CD longevity. CDs are extremely cheap now. Here's the big problem...data that comes on "anti-piracy" CDs; those pesky PC games that refuse to copy or the CD that can't be ripped.

    Sure, there are hacks and work arounds...but they aren't always readily available.

    For instance...I bought Battlefield 1942 and couldn't make a backup. My little sister destroyed the 2nd disc. Now I can't reinstall it. I couldn't make a backup because the original disc contained bit errors. When I contacted EA, they told me to go screw myself.

    1. Re:The real problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When I contacted EA, they told me to go screw myself.

      Wow! So it's almost like you work there!

    2. Re:The real problem. by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow! To save the price of sending you a second CD that is useless by itself (i.e. you couldn't sell it or anything), they refused to send you one, causing you to tell all of Slashdot how they screw their customers. Great marketing, EA!

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    3. Re:The real problem. by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      No problem man, just eDonkey that shit and be done with it.

    4. Re:The real problem. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Note to self, Never purchase an EA title. I think Ill stick to Epic, Atari and Digital Extereams (the people behind UT) hell one of the official UT2K3 patches removed CD-check

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:The real problem. by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      I couldn't make a backup because the original disc contained bit errors.
      That would be a problem with your CD-Burning software. Nero, Alcohol 120%, Clone CD and other applications should have no trouble making backups of most applications using SafeDisc.

      Even so, there are also virtual image drives that are able to emulate SafeDisc/SecuROM protection as if it is the original. You should be able to look around for them.
  96. how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zeros and ones carved into stone? If you make them really small, you might get good density out of it...

  97. Commerical DVDs were supposed to be better, but... by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    Yes, many of the formats with problems have been discussed here several times before. But I find the following quote from the article especially disturbing and annoying (emphasis added):

    DVDs are a bit tougher than CDs in the sense that the data layer (or layers -- some discs have two) is sandwiched in the middle of the disc between two layers of plastic. But this structure causes problems of its own, especially in early DVDs. The glue that holds the layers together can lose its grip, making the disc unreadable at least in parts.

    Users that bend a DVD to remove it from a hard-gripping case are practically begging for this problem, because flexing the disc puts strain on the glue.

    So those extremely annoying DVD cases are actually designed to reduce DVD lifetimes and make us re-purchase the same license all that much sooner.

  98. tapes don't last either by blitz487 · · Score: 1

    I have some tape backups that lasted a lot less than that. The reason? Can't find a machine that will read the tapes anymore. I heard that google had a hard time reading some old magtapes to get the old news archives off of them (circa late '80s).

    1. Re:tapes don't last either by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "I have some tape backups that lasted a lot less than that. The reason? Can't find a machine that will read the tapes anymore. I heard that google had a hard time reading some old magtapes to get the old news archives off of them (circa late '80s)."

      Oods are the data is still good. You just chose to not spend the time and money to get the information off the tapes. Hell, you can still get data off of punch cards. I would be shocked if there wasn't someone out there with a tape drive that would read your tapes.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  99. I have several music cd's from 1985... by NegativeCreep · · Score: 0
    Like, Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon. My very first CD. I remember buying a sony cdp-something for around 600 bucks, with money earned from working on a farm for 10 bucks a day. Then, running down to Sears, the only place that actually sold CDs, and after realizing I could only get classical music, and pink floyd, opted for floyd.

    It still plays nicely.

    Interesting thing though, the CD and jewel case are much thicker than contemporary CDs...

  100. Longest Media by geolane · · Score: 1

    1) the gold disk in each of the Voyagers

    2) Rosettastones Rosetta Stone google cache: Rosetta Stone Cache

  101. Just a thought by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 1

    Back up your stuff onto high-capacity Hard Drives and put them in some little anti-static plastic baggies and keep them in the freezer. Once something more reliable and better per gig storage comes along upgrade. Or just upgrade all your media to the latest and greatset storage every ten years.

    1. Re:Just a thought by endlessoul · · Score: 1

      I agree with the harddisks, but the freezer? Is that even okay to do?

  102. Wrong About One Thing by Gandalph00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Article was wrong about one thing tapes are definately a good storage medium. My Mum and Dad had some old real to real tapes sent over from england by their Mum and Dad, that were say over 30 yrs old. They lived in a shed for the last 20 yrs in a plastic bag going through tempreture variations from 0 degrees C at night to over 40 degrees C during the day throughout several years. I went to convert them to digital format and I thought I was going to have to spend weeks using a computer studio to refine the sound. But after all that abuse the tracks from these real to real tapes were of really good quality and it only took me an hour to clean them up.

  103. Not the whole story by Black+Art · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most of the problems of cd rot can be traced to the stickers used for labels, not the cds themselves.

    I have seen post-it-notes pull the foil off older cheap cd-rs.

    I saw one study a while back that showed that the biggest problem was the labels that people were putting on burned cdrs. They cause damage to the adhesive holding the foil to the media. It would not surprise me if it did.

    Commercial cds (including data cds) are a different story. I have some incredibly old cds going back to the 80s. They all work fine.

    DVDs tend to have a layer of plastic between the foil and the outside. (Probably just for this problem.) Of couse, that may just be the good brands...

    Much of this story is standard media scare/hype. ("If you don't listen to us YOUR DATA COULD DIE!") It is based on a real problem though.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:Not the whole story by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 3, Informative
      DVDs tend to have a layer of plastic between the foil and the outside. (Probably just for this problem.)

      No, sorry: DVDs have a plastic layer between the foil and the outside because the DVD standard allows for double-sided disks: the foil (reflective) layer has to be in the same place on ALL disks, though, so your single-sided DVDs will have that extra layer of plastic to "fill out" the disk to the proper thickness.

      --
      What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    2. Re:Not the whole story by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      First, I'll agree that both he threats ARE there, but the risks are way overblown in most cases.

      DVDs aren't immune to potential rot. I've had a couple DVDs go bad but never any CDs. The DVD gets a little too cloudy and murky. Sometimes it is attributed to substandard glue or application process.

      DVDs do have a small chance of delaminating too, where the two 0.6mm plastic halves separate from each other, again, attributed to poor glue but sometimes people do stress them too much by flexing them way too much when removing them from certian stubborn cases.

      There is a rumor that the cheaper DVD pressing plants use non standard plastics that are more permiable to water and oxygen than the specified plastic. Short of chemical testing or a whistleblower, there's no way to be sure.

    3. Re:Not the whole story by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Question, if the foil comes off older CDR's can you just paint over the holes with a chrome paint?

    4. Re:Not the whole story by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Yes, but will your CDs still be readable 500 years from now?

  104. Yes, of course by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    The record companies secretly helped design CDs so they would rot and deny people access to their music and data.

    Sounds like a bad Scooby-Doo script.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  105. Riiiiiight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I also have a Star Trek soundtrack CD from 1985 that works fine too.

    Er, I'm not sure the phrase "works fine" can ever be meaningfully associated with a Star Treck soundtrack CD. ;)

  106. Building Vacuum's Bomb From Scratch Is Easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's very easy, good, cheap and niceful.

    Buy 2 vacuum's bombs from the old fridges, many "Super Mario"'s (pipes, pieces and tools), rubbers of bicycle's wheels ... and the small (oil_or_water)-barrel of hard plastic.

    These 2 bombs are mounted in serie to extract 95%of_1st + (5%of_1st * 95%of_2nd) of air = 99.75% of air (remaining 0.25% of air in the barrel).

    The barrel is divided in 2 halves and joined with the rubber of the bicycle's wheel.

    And mounting the pipes are very easy with the good tools and specific pieces of "Super Mario" :)

    open4free

    1. Re:Building Vacuum's Bomb From Scratch Is Easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How to build a good arcaic vacuum meter?

      It's very easy.

      Put a tiny bottle with water after of output of the last bomb:

      If there is not bubbles in the tiny bottle with water then the barrel has reached the maximum of vacuum possible
      It's a good indicator :D open4free (c)
  107. Business...ever heard of it? by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Probably the same reason regualr appliance betteries haven't got much better in the last decade. if the stuff lasts too long why would you have to buy more or upgrade to the latest and greatest? Point being: Maybe they sell poor quality CD-Rs so that you have to backup(buy more frequently) more often.

  108. Yes... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the license has a cash value of 1/20th of one cent. A pristine copy will cost you $17.99 minus 1/20th of one cent.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Yes... by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the license has a cash value of 1/20th of one cent. A pristine copy will cost you $17.99 minus 1/20th of one cent.

      If that were true, than the unlicensed KaZaa users that were sued shouldn't have to pay more than 1 penny for every twenty songs.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  109. This is the reason I switched to CDs by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1
    "In storing and handling this compact disc you should apply the same care as with conventional records. No further cleaning will be necessary if the compact disc is always held by the edges and is replaced in its case directly after playing. Should the compact disc become soiled by fingerprints, dust, or dirt it can be wiped (always in a strait line from center to edge) with a clean and lint free, soft, dry cloth. No solvent or abrasive cleaner should ever be used on the disc. If you follow these suggestions, the compact disc will provide a lifetime of pure listening enjoyment."

    I am under 30, and I think even the crazy court system would have to agree that is not "a lifetime". Funny they stopped printing this nonsense as soon as everyone own a CD player.

    If any lawyer here would like to help file class-action, I am interested.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  110. You get what you pay for by dspasovski · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who in their right mind can put its trust and record his/her essential data onto a mass produced medium with an average price of $0.10?

    What do you think about using a quality hard drive as an alternative for long-term storage? Coupled with a drawer cabinet for the drive, open-sourced file system format, and a safe place for keeping it when it's offline -- this seems to me like a better long-term solution than CDs (well, at least for 10-15 years - until the disk interface changes...).

  111. DVDs, too by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


    If I have to return another defective rented DVD for store credit one more time, I don't know what to think about DVDs. These aren't defective due to typical retarded-moron thumbprints and scratches, they are visibly defective with wierd amorphous patterns on the disk.

    While DVDs are generally awesome...renting DVDs sucks big time (washing every single rented DVD to make it playable is just a big pain in the ass).

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  112. "Lifetime" is ambiguous. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    They could easily have meant the lifetime of the CD. That would be just like lifetime warranty... for the lifetime of the device. It's happened before.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:"Lifetime" is ambiguous. by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      True, but probably a matter to convince a jury about what you think. Read it aloud, and there is only one meaning in my opinion. "Is" mean "is".

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
  113. Dream by YoJ · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I just had this bizarre dream. I floating in empty space, bored, so I decided to check Slashdot to relieve the monotony. But all the stories were duplicates! Even the comments were just cut and pasted from old stories. That's when I realized, I was dead and in hell.

    Luckily I woke up and escaped the tedium... OR DID I???

  114. FIA Request by WeekendKruzr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, you could probably ask to see the info through a Freedom of Information Act request...

    1. Re:FIA Request by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, you could probably ask to see the info through a Freedom of Information Act request...

      Great, invoke something that is legitimately within your rights and risk being investigated by the FBI as a "possible pirate"?

  115. UserFriendly Cartoon: April 28.2002 by Pikhq · · Score: 1

    Net Geeks There's no need to feel guilt I said Net Geeks For the software you built I said Net Geeks Cause you're not in the wrong There's no need to feel unhappy! Net Geeks You can burn a CD I said Net Geeks With your fave MP3s You can play them In your home or your car Many ways to take them real far! It's fun to violate The D M C A! It's fun to violate The D M C A-AY! You have everything You need to enjoy Your music with your toys! It's fun to violate The D M C A! It's fun to violate The D M C A-AY! You can archive your tunes! You can share over cable! You can annoy the Record labels!

    --
    echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    1. Re:UserFriendly Cartoon: April 28.2002 by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      Someone! Please, fix the Slashcode!

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    2. Re:UserFriendly Cartoon: April 28.2002 by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Someone! Please, fix the Slashcode!

      What's there to fix? There's nothing wrong with your post that a few <br> tags wouldn't have fixed, if you had put them in there.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:UserFriendly Cartoon: April 28.2002 by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      *kicks self for temporarely forgetting HTML and how to spell*
      OK, done kicking self...

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
  116. Less immortal than *WHO* thought? by menscher · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Did anyone really think CDs were good for more than 5-10 years?

    Gotta love how CNN assumes that everyone is as dumb as their editors. Somehow I doubt anyone in the slashdot crowd hasn't known about the longevity problems in CDs for at least 5 years now. And yet this is suddenly "news"?

    1. Re:Less immortal than *WHO* thought? by Rxke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that we were led to believe so by the industry... Also who recalls the first ads where people scratched the CD's really bad with scissors(!) and how it would be still readable? (one of the tricks to diss vynil) CD's were the future, virtually undestructable, and that meme stuck. Very good advertising.

      result: *a lot* of people are still backing up important data on cd's, thinking it is safe, even musea. I'm doing a masters in Conservation/restoration of visual media, and try to specialise in digital 'stuff," so i talk about these things with archivists and believe me, i've had several discussions with people in smallr musea, proudly showing me their rows upon rows of purty CD-R's... When i point out the issues known with longetivity, they go from 'yea, right, funny,' to utter horror when we do a random check of their archive...

      "but they told us they have a shelf life of more thn 100 years!"
      Indeed they did, and it's criminal IM not-so HO....

      Anyway, it only means more work for me in the future, perhaps :p

  117. Dream by GeneralCern · · Score: 1

    I just had this bizarre dream. I floating in empty space, bored, so I decided to check Slashdot to relieve the monotony. But all the stories were duplicates! Even the comments were just cut and pasted from old stories. That's when I realized, I was dead and in hell.
    Luckily I woke up and escaped the tedium... OR DID I???

  118. Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the NY Times "discovers" IRC, then slashdot discovers CD rot. I'm waiting for the Wall Street Journal article on the rising economy of the Soviet Union...

  119. Duh by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    List of ways cds become unusable:

    1. Proximity to microwave ovens
    2. Cats
    3. Dogs
    4. Spool stacking
    5. Drive malfunctions (AKA: Ptouch+CDR=boom)
    6. Drops
    7. Scratches
    8. Nicks
    10. Desk Scrapes
    11. Drive scrapes
    12. Case scrapes
    13. Resurfacing
    14. Time
    15. Sunlight

  120. CloneCD/DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use CloneCD. (you may have to look awhile to find it, because the company no longer sells it).

  121. Best CDR brands? An answer for Rob by Ferguson · · Score: 5, Funny
    ARRRGH!!! I cannot answer this (What CDR brand) in easy to understand layman language!!!

    Like most things, I too am an expert in this field (CD media)

    RiTEK or Taiyo Yuden or Mitsui are "semi acceptable"

    CDRs use frail ORAGANIC dye prone to steady erasure and destruction from heat, light, water, etc.

    All media sucks for long term archival except perhaps STAMPED glass platter cds using gold sputterred reflection. They are called "Century Discs" and you have never seen one, though they are special fabbed. They are inorganic. No plastic to "droop" no aluminum to oxidize slowly into powder over the decades. (Aluminum oxidizes in 2 millionths of one second when exposed to air but creates a semi-safe blanket of aluminum oxide a couple atoms thick and remains mostly reflective.) All cdrs are slowly rotting, but if kept cold could last a while and be readable in a "flat bed static CD scanner" in 2020 and later.

    Start of Side topic #1 ; inorganic home recordable +100 year archival media:

    I own "mostly inorganic" glass platter PDO media for archiving with a four and a half thousand dollar device I bought once. It's a Maxtor (Maxoptix) Tahiti-II and each blank cost over 100 dollars. But the data will last centuries under ANY HEAT and ANY atmosphere and ANY Radiation and ANY magnetism because it uses PLASMA STATE recording. A rare earth element is heated past liquid, past gas state, into PLASMA STATE by a ridiculously espensive high powered laser, and while in this state, a strong magnetic field orientates the crystals of the cooling rare earth metal into north-or south orientation. A simple low power read-only laser can use a polarizing filter to readily discern this data. It can do so centuries from now. The Library of Congress uses these 4 thousand dollar recorders, and the US military... and also myself for pleasure. Yup I stored porn on these Tahiti-II glass platter inorganic discs! Too bad the timing-tracking marks embedded in these crystal media 125 dollar platters was imprinted using a plastic marking substance instead of the official "acid etching using H2SO3F+" Magic acid.

    Only magic acid can eat a beaker or mark the inside timing marks of these special multi-century media... and Phillips Dupont CHEATED ME and fucking used PLASTIC which will rot away slowly over the next 75 years depriving our future generations of my porn collection. You can buy magic acid in special containers, or manufacture your own by mixing antimony pentafluoride (SbF55) and fluorosulphonic acid (HSO3F). It has an unbelievable pka of 20 and is powerful enough to protonate saturated alkanes forming carbonium ions... and etch glass without spending a lot of effort trying to use hyperboloid 5Kw lasers on clear glass.

    UI am definitely going off on a tangent and I was still talking about CD reflectivity, so I will continue...

    End of Side topic #1 ; inorganic home recordable +100 year archival media:

    I have visited pressing plants, sputtering plants, and even polycarb manufacturers for DVD and CDR, and taken a few 1,200 dollar a day seminars on laser head movement and design.

    Refectivity in a CD or CD-ROM is irrelevant. The laser usually uses a "Quarter wave" plate and the frequency of the laser is specially selected and this rotated light has a 90 degree polarity difference (differential phase) that makes reading possible at high speeds. This is less relevant in CDR but very important in stamped media. I discuss this at length for you below a second discussion in my Side topic #2 on : CD Reflectivity Layers (not needing any metal or even being transparently covered)

    Amusing Side NOTE : I am not just Mr Medical boy, Mr microbiology Man, Mr Lawyer, Mr Musician, Mr Trivia Buff, Etc... i am also Mr Computer expert and CD device consultant, and paid a couple times in my life to consult on CDR mechanism design.

    The best CDRs use a special dye invented by Mitsui Toatsu Corporation (MTC), but no longer true after 2000 unless you have old stockpil

    1. Re:Best CDR brands? An answer for Rob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you, david foster wallace.

      we're looking forward to your next project.

  122. Same problems as I had with tape - by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    But when they work the fidelity is better... I have lost count of the amount of unuseable discs I have created over the years - CD's shattering as I have taken them out of the case, scratches where they've actually slid down under the car seat and given themselves a nice buffing up from outside to centre.. I could go on... The point is in real everyday use (lets say before the time of the iPod) CD's are, in terms of reliability, every bit as disposable as tapes.. In a strange twist of irony I should point out that the first CD I bought ever is one of the very few pre 1990 CD's I have left and is still in great condition.. But again I don't think the manufacturing was so cheap back then either..

  123. Pirate is passe by WeekendKruzr · · Score: 2, Funny
    Great, invoke something that is legitimately within your rights and risk being investigated by the FBI as a "possible pirate"?
    You won't investigated as a pirate, you'll be investigated as a possible terrorist.
    1. Re:Pirate is passe by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That was an intentional pun. I switched the word to "pirate" because of the media & media cartel business, to keep it somewhat closer to topic.

      Terrorist doesn't seem too far off though given what the pundits and authorities have been trying to do.

  124. Burning at low speed vs. high speed by achurch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    - Burn them at low speed (the lowest my current burner allows with my SW is 8x)

    This is actually false, at least pertaining to newer faster drives.

    You're correct to the extent that you use the disc in the same (or an equivalent-spec) drive. However, CDs intended for use in audio players or old (=12x) drives should be burned at no more than 12x; burning at higher speeds is done using CAV (constant angular velocity), which tends to confuse low-speed drives.

    1. Re:Burning at low speed vs. high speed by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Copies of my CD's only work in my car stereo when burned at 4x (lowest I can go)

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  125. that's not even mentioning by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that's not even mentioning by Alioth · · Score: 1
      This is Slashdot. Shouldn't


      C:\>tracert life.liberty.pursuit-of-happiness


      really be:

      $ traceroute life.liberty.pursuit-of-happiness

      We'll have no 8.3 limited filenames here!
  126. I've got LOTS of CD's with this! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I was glad to see a photo of someone else's CD's because it confirmed what I was unsure of.

    This problem is worst on CHEAP CD's that I have, the extremely cheapy types (piss poor quality to begin with) are eating away like ants eating a cake at a picnic.

    It started when my A/C went out two summers ago and I went all summer with the windows open. 99% humidity and temps average around 96-100 indoors. I had no idea what was going on, I though I had spilled toner on the discs (because I open a toner cart) and thought that the toner ate the discs but I couldn't find any toner spilled anywhere.

    This pisses me off and it worries me, as I have LOTS of old CD's that I want and need to keep.
    I need to calculate how much hard drive space I need to store them all on HDD, dump what I can to hard drives and put the hard drives away in a safe. I've got old hard drives that are 20 years old that I can STILL fire up and read the data after all these years. I've got CD's that are f*cked beyond salvage that I can ill afford to lose that are less than 2 years old..

    Screw CD's..... I'm terminating my love afair with this SHITTY technology starting right now...

  127. A solution to your problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This solution is probably know by many and is almost always DMCA Illegal, but here goes...

    www.megagames.com, and other sites contain "cracks" for many games that will allow you to fully install most games out there and play them without the CD present. This allows for the distinct advantage of saving wear and tear on the CD/DVD(s) and/or making a backup of them. The catch is, for your purposes, this will only work under the following circumstances:

    a) The games is fully self-contained in one folder/directory, and is not also putting .DLL files all over and/or requiring registry entries during installation. This is much more common as of late but some games are still old school and put stuff everywhere.

    or

    b) The game can be installed from the hard drive. This possibility is much more common in that almost ALL games can be installed from a folder in a local hard drive, but will still require the CD/DVD to be present to be played. All that is left to be done, then, is copy entire contents of the disk to hd folder, install from there, THEN apply the crack and back up the hard drive of the installer folder to a CR-R/RW DVD-R/RW +R/RW. If making a backup goes against your (legal) grain, just put the original CD in a safe place.

  128. god damn it by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    Why do they have to tie every freaking thing into the RIAA and SCO? It would be nice if this news for nerds site provided some more technical news and less social news. Really, as a nerd I just don't care that much about the RIAA. I'm sick of hearing about them. Their existence has little effect on me and my nerdness.
    For that matter, I don't care to hear about every nut who thinks that Sun should opensource java, or Y should opensource x. Discussion of the ethics of software development is beyond boring to most people who actually develop software.
    So, to some things up. Slashdot, I like you, but please stop being such a fanboy script kiddie website. Please call me again when you are mature enough to post more technical articles, less trash, and are ready to discuss long term commitment.

  129. Zip disks by Erwos · · Score: 1

    You know, something which I found funny was that my Zip Disks have stood the test of time pretty well - a lot better than the Zip 100 drives did, too.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  130. Even more surprising... by taxevader · · Score: 1

    who would've guessed Gimli from LOTR fame listens to CD's? See the pic in the article.

    --
    -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.
  131. Previous /. Stories by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://slashdot.org/articles/03/08/24/1253248.shtm l?tid=126&tid=137&tid=198

    http://slashdot.org/articles/04/04/22/1658251.sh tm l?tid=137&tid=198

    It's good to know these things eventually filter down to CNN.

  132. Backups required by jridley · · Score: 1

    So, this is a perfect reason why we need to be able to back up our music CDs, so it's completely legitimate to break music CD copy protection in the name of fair use (making backups).

  133. question about the write-up by shark72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The near-immortality of CDs, sometimes used as an excuse by record companies as an argument for their high cost"

    I've never heard a record company state that a CD's near-immortality is a reason for its cost. Has anybody else? Can somebody provide a citation?

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    1. Re:question about the write-up by a24061 · · Score: 1

      I can't provide a citation but I'm sure that when they were pushed in the 1980s part of the marketing was that unlike tape or vinyl they would not wear out from use and that they would last about 100 years.

  134. They were taken by Star Command by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Star Command has taken all the old CD's leaving us with this Aluminum technology. All so they can make wings for their Space Ranger suits of that terillium-carbonic alloy.

  135. Oh brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The reason why people, informed people at least, are buying from Apple"

    No, that's why a few people with an inflated opinion of their intelligence buy from iTunes.

    REALLY smart people real realize that CD's are routinely available for well under $9 US (http://www.bmgmusic.com). Further they understand that there is no restriction on the CD, I can sell it when I want, where I want, I can make copies to preserve the original, and the sonic quality is significantly better than iTMS.

    Oh, did I mention it's cheaper per album? I suppose if you're ADHD and listen to top ten hits, you can save a few bucks, but generally artists worth listening to have entire albums worth listening to. Its not all about the hits. At least not to anyone over the age of 11.

    Allow me to ask you a few questions

    1) Do you think its okay that I can listen to a song that I purchased where I want, when I want, in any device that I want?

    2) Is it okay that you can't sell the song when you're tired of it?

    3) Do you find it acceptable that someone else tells you in what manner you may use the song?

    1. Re:Oh brother. by btlzu2 · · Score: 0

      If you post logged in I'll answer. Otherwise, don't bother.

      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    2. Re:Oh brother. by FLEB · · Score: 0, Troll


      ** FLEB sits back and enjoys being an Emusic subscriber... 22 cents a song, LAME VBR MP3 without DRM...

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    3. Re:Oh brother. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Aw, man, don't be like that. Read the post, and judge it on its merits, not on who wrote it. I just got done telling a guy last night that the importance is in the messege, not the meesenger. Even the worst people on the planet have been known to make insightful statements. That doesn't make it any less valid. Besides, sometimes a person may not be able to log for some reason or another...or he could be a real dick. I'm not the one to judge.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Oh brother. by btlzu2 · · Score: 1
      Well, he was probably being AC because he was already trying to be insulting, that's sorta what rubbed me wrong anyway. You can always be a big man hiding behind an AC.

      I am really sick of people spewing out insults when someone disagrees with them. I used to be that way too, I admit it, and I just don't like it! A friend of mine has a quote that says it all:
      The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress. - Joseph Joubert

      For all I know, I may process some of our discussion over time and agree more with you down the road! Also, you and I were able to converse without resorting to insults. :) I use the journals a lot and we're all pretty sick of AC trolls, so I guess I'm a little biased.
      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
  136. Holy Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG! I can't believe that fine groups like the RIAA would actually lie to consumers!

  137. Archival CDs by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kodak Gold CDs - which are the discs which quote 100 year life span, use an inert gold refective substrate, and the dye technology used for the write layer is quite similar to the dyes used for their film stocks. Typically these disc will have a slower maximum burn speed as they need slightly more heat/energy to set to dye state to a 1 or 0.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    1. Re:Archival CDs by pomakis · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unfortunately, Kodak stopped making gold CD-Rs a few years ago. I used to use them exclusively until they did. I guess the market demand wasn't high enough for them. People would rather pay 5 cents less for a disk than have a more reliable medium.

      The only other gold CD-Rs I'm aware of are Mitsumi Gold, and I was shocked to hear that these are no longer made either (as of just a few months ago)! Doh!

      If anybody knows of any other gold CD-Rs on the market, please let me know! In the meantime, I guess I'll just have to be very diligent with my backups.

    2. Re:Archival CDs by captainClassLoader · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apogee makes gold CD-Rs that are used in high-end digital audio. Might be worth a look...

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    3. Re:Archival CDs by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People would rather pay 5 cents less for a disk than have a more reliable medium.

      I guess in 100 years, my backups will not any more have any value anyway. I'm not even sure there will still be CD reading drives after that time. After all, who of you still can read his old 5.25" floppy disks, even if they are still OK?
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Archival CDs by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I still have a functioning 5.25" in my PC (Athlon 1.4), at least a month ago it could still read one of my "floppies".
      I do not use it very often, but it nicely fill's in the B: in the alphabet in Windows ;-)

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  138. CD's make a nice light show in the microwave by Hulkster · · Score: 1

    If you haven't tried it, DO put a CD (that you don't care about!) in a Microwave, turn off all the lights, and fire it up - quite the light (and sound) show for 10-15 seconds! ;-)

    1. Re:CD's make a nice light show in the microwave by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      But also do remember that it'll give off fumes that are carcinogenic.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    2. Re:CD's make a nice light show in the microwave by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Should we also use a microwave we don't care about?

  139. Yes, because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a good limitation, because what it does is stop professional pirates. Because they, after all, won't just spend the $8/disc to begin with to make full sonic-quality copies.

    They'll just go to iTMS with inferior sound and DRM to make the illegal copies. Not to mention these copies from iTMS won't be identified correctly because the bar-coding won't match.

    But iTMS won't let those nasty pirates do their evil thing. No Sirreeeebob. Apple has it all figure out. And thank heavens for all the apple defenders.

    1. Re:Yes, because by Graff · · Score: 1
      But iTMS won't let those nasty pirates do their evil thing. No Sirreeeebob.

      It's not about stopping the pirates, it's about liability. Apple has to put up some sort of barrier, however easy to circumvent, so that when someone does pirate the music Apple can say that they have protections in place. That way the pirate has to circumvent the protection and Apple can say that they don't support piracy.
  140. Never seen anything like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His blog is like his article, stupid and incomprehensible.

    No joke. Check it yourself. I'd call him a retard except its an insult to retards everywhere. Maybe "moron" is better.

  141. Oxidation after 15 years by j.leidner · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In 1995, I discussed CD rot with a university librarian, who complained to me about his library's data loss caused by CDs exhibiting oxidation of the aluminium layer. He mentioned the discs concerned were barely 15 years old.

    If you think about it, paper is relatively high tech in comparison: read/write, random access to pages, zero energy consumption, and it last at least 750 years (if it carries the little infinity symbol -- see International Standard ISO/IEC 9706 (1994) Information and Documentation-Paper for Documents-Requirements for Permanence).

  142. rot hole? Fscking BS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolute bs, many of my old CDs had these holes from the beginning and they still play fine here. CD player interpolation can bridge several millimeters of completely unreadable data, that geekish webdesigner probably tried to play his CDs back on his crappy CD-ROM to listen to it via the soundcard and his 50 bucks computer speakers.

  143. So they should be cheaper. by crashnbur · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, so their lifespan isn't as interminable as the RIAA and MPAA would like us to believe. This isn't a new development. It's been known about for years, but (for obvious reasons) the mass-producers of these things aren't in a hurry to let us know that they'll only last a little bit longer than the average cassette, and only if you take extraordinarily good care of it every time you handle it for the rest of your (un?)natural life.

    A new development, in terms of spacetime and the existence of all things, are these copy-protecte discs that don't even allow us to secure our purchased goods with backup copies.

    Oh, and try this one on: last May my car was broken into, and several of my CDs were stolen. Lucky me, I backup most of my CDs. But I was recently approached by someone who was "concerned" about the fact that I have a 50-CD spindle of audio CDR's in my car -- naturally, the person is thinking piracy. And naturally, at least a few of the CDs are pirated copies -- but suppose none of them were: someone could quite plausibly be found guilty of music piracy to the tune of a couple thousand dollars just because their CDs are stolen. After all, if you don't own it, how can you prove that your copies are legit?

    I no longer remember the purpose of this, so I'll end on that note. Just food for thought.

    1. Re:So they should be cheaper. by acb · · Score: 1

      If your CDs were stolen, so was your license to the music on them. As such, your spindle of CD-Rs is illegal.

  144. order a replacement! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    Duh! EA has a pretty cool replacement policy. just send the disc + some $$$ and they'll send you a new one. Last ones I got were some Sims disks [another EA game!] my kids cracked...it cost about $7-8 for "shipping and handling". Turn around was much less than the 6-8 weeks....I got mine back in about 3.

    Dirty little secret: often you simply get another Whole new jewelcase too...i.e. including a new CD-Key!!!

  145. Bit Rot by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    I just had to make the Gibson reference.

  146. Less Immortal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Less Immortal"
    Anyone else see something wrong with that?

  147. "Fragile Protective Layer" by tasinet · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really love the term "Fragile protective Layer"
    It goes well with "Glass Bulletproof Vest".

  148. Don't think in terms of Memorex or Fuji. by Hitokage_Nishino · · Score: 2, Informative

    What really matters is not how your cdrs have been rebranded, but who originally made them.

    Fujifilm spindles that say "Made in Japan" on them are made by Taiyo Yuden, one of the higher quality cdr fabs... but Memorex "Made in Taiwan" can either be Prodisc or CMC (flaky).

    I'm more than a little dissapointed that both my local CompUSA and Best Buy are replacing Made-in-Japan Fujifilm spindles with Made-in-Taiwan Fujifilm for 50 and 100 disc spindles, leaving me with the 30 disc spindles.

  149. Yes it has, even BEFORE CDS! by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Remember Pioneer LaserVideo? Yep. Early Laserdiscs also suffered from rot, although the reason for that was due to poor sealing between the disc halves.

    I call my new DVD-based data storage solution: "6 discs away from disaster..." It works like this:

    Before CD's, I had floppies - and boy DID I! Stacks and stacks of the things. When I got my first CD-R writer, I started to move all of my data from floppies to CD-R. That was almost 10 years ago.

    Recently, I went through all my old CD-R's and backed up that data to DVDs. Out of a 250 or so CD's around 30 were irrelevant due to newer program versions and at least 10 had issues being read from the drive. In every one of those cases it was some cheap no-name disc with just a thin layer seperating me data from certain death. A single scratch was perhaps not enough to destroy the disc - right away - but over time, that scratch's rot grew like rust to encompass much of the disc's surface.

    What discs I did salvage recently, I converted to DVD-/+R (I swing both ways). :) So now, I roughly fit 6 CD-R's on one DVD. Of course I've learned not to skimp on quality - especially now that each one of these discs represent 6 CD's and countless floppies worth of information!

    So I guess the next big thing is Blu-Ray. Then I fit, what around 5 DVD's on one of those... Then what, Dual Blu - 10 DVD's on one. Then maybe... Holocube tech? Oh, to put it all on one small cube!

    But beware the heartache if you were to LOSE THAT to rot!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  150. AIT specs vs AIT reality by LandGator · · Score: 1

    It's sooo nice to see someone at Sony has a sense of humor.

    I do RMAs for an IT shop (among a bazillion other things). My #1 item is AIT tapes (#2 is 3Com NICs, BTW).

    We use Sony branded tapes (SDX2-50C and SDX2-36C) and Sony branded drives.

    I figure we have about 500 tapes, and run four a night, Monday through Friday. Maybe, 263*4= 1,052 tape runs a year.

    I replace 20 tapes a year under RMA. Geeze, that's as bad as my first-gen Matsushita "RCA" VHS VCR.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  151. LESS immortal? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    last time i checked, immortality was a boolean kind of thing- you can't be semi-immortal any more than you can be semi-dead.

    ...this reminds me of that Seinfeld where Jerry was arguing with George about the possibility of over-drying his clothes-

    GEORGE
    ...Your stuff has to be done by now. Why don't you just see if it's dry? Just--you know--

    JERRY
    No, no, no! Don't interrupt the cycle. The machine is working! It--it knows what it's doing; just let it finish.

    GEORGE
    You're gonna over dry it.

    JERRY
    Ya--Ya can't over dry.

    GEORGE
    Why not?!

    JERRY
    Same reason you can't over wet. See, once something is wet, it's Wet. Same thing with Death. Like, once you die, you're dead. Right? Let's say you drop dead an' I shoot you. You're not gonna die again; you're already dead! Ya can't over die, ya can't over dry!

  152. Old CDs by Nonillion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a Yes 90125 CD I bought in 1985 and it plays just fine. The only CD I have that has visible "pin holes" is Pink Floyd Ummagumma, but it also plays and rips fine. Way before I bought a computer I used to record my CDs onto video tape using my Sony HiFi VTR. I still have tapes I recorded 15 years ago that still play just fine and are so close to "CD quality" that you would have to know what artifacts to listen for to tell the difference.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  153. Red Green by yRabbit · · Score: 1

    The ladies may not find you handsome, but they should at least find you have a handy amount of slashdotisms memorized.
    (In Soviet Russia, I for one welcome our beowulf clusterlords)

  154. past article by Saturninus · · Score: 1

    I have read past articles on this. If I recall, the high quality CD-Rs with the gold background last for one hundred years. The ones with the blue background ten. However, a research team once wrote data to different discs made by different manufacturers. They stored them in a dark place for two years. After this period of time some of the discs would not read. Unfortunately they did not disclose which brands did not last.

  155. don't buy name brands? by bakreule · · Score: 1
    The worst part is that manufacturers frequently change the materials and manufacturing methods without notifying users. ... This renders the frequently heard advice to buy name-brand discs for maximum longevity fairly moot, he says.

    Why? I buy name brand CDRs because I trust Maxell and Sony more than Joe's Blanks and the cost is not that much higher. If I'm wrong about that, fine, but this quote from the article doesn't say anything that would counter that long-held name-brand belief.

    Just because manufacturers change their methods, doesn't mean the quality control goes away (again, I'm assuming it's there in the first place). It just means it's harder to test lifetime endurance.

    --

    Buses stop at a bus station
    Trains stop at a train station
    On my desk there's a workstation....

  156. FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Last sentence from article: "I'm hoping they'll hold out till that next medium gets popular, and everyone gets to buy everything over again," he says.

    Anybody wonders wether they spread FUD to prepare the field for a new sales round? Remember, media industry wants you to buy the same shit over and over again, like it majorly happened when they introduced the CD in the first place.

    Interesting point about the article: "Koster", who's CD collection rots away, is *not* furious, seeking for replacements or thinking about sueing the industry. No, like being befallen by fate, he accepts the damage calm like a cow, being happy that some CDs still work. And his (and the articles) bottom line, i.e. that he and *everyone* will buy over the whole stuff again someday, to me just looks like smearing the idea right into your face.

  157. Mozart Copyright by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    He must charge huge royalties too, because his musical "The Marriage of Figaro" charges a lot more for tickets than Lloyd-Webber ones like "Phantom of the Opera". That Mozart guy must be raking the money in!

  158. As discussed before on Slashdot by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out CDs, DVDs Eyed For Long-Term Archival Use, because a lot of this has already been covered...

  159. Article contradicts previous article by Daemonic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From previous article mentioned on slashdot
    Not all optical media is vulnerable. The rewritable variants (RW) use metallic materials that change the phase of the light, rather than light-sensitive dyes.
    And from this article, we have
    Rewriteable CDs and DVDs, as opposed to write-once discs, should not be used for long-term storage because they contain a heat-sensitive layer that decays much faster than the metal layers of other discs.
    So now I'm just totally confused.
  160. Immortal just the way it is in sci-fi stories by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    The "immortality" of CD's reminds me of the way immortality is often portrayed in sci-fi stories............with a catch.....usually a physical vulnerablility.

    Live forever, but if you get a cut, you will die..etc..etc.

    CD's are just way too dainty with the way they can easily be mishandled.

    Perhaps something like the mini-cd wrapped in a cartridge would be the answer.

    However, we all know how the RIAA is about being innovative so I will quit my bitching now.
    Steve

  161. bluray DISC by earthstar · · Score: 0

    wait till ya see BLURAY disc... that promise anything from 25-50gb storage!! ofcourse no gurantee on how long they will last...

  162. Gold CD-R by careysb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kodak no longer sells the "Gold" CD-R's that are supposed to last for a very long time. However, Mitsui (Colorado Springs, CO) is still selling them.

  163. CDs outlast vinyl?!? by uglyduckling · · Score: 1
    From the article: Irons is still pretty happy with CD technology, since it beats vinyl LPs and tape for longevity.

    I'm pretty sure that if I lock a record in a clean room it will still be there centuries later - or am I missing something?

    1. Re:CDs outlast vinyl?!? by edraven · · Score: 1

      I think the thing you are missing might be that some people like to listen to the music recorded on the LPs, tapes, or CDs.

    2. Re:CDs outlast vinyl?!? by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Sure - and I know that tapes wear out pretty quickly. But I'm not convinced that, with proper handling and well set-up equipment, a CD would get more playback cycles than a vinyl record. It would be good to try it and find out. It's worth remembering that when a record starts to get worn it will sound muffled, when a CD gets worn it will sound silent.

  164. Don't use sticky labels??? by Zoinks · · Score: 1

    I suppose I expected CDs to last longer than a few years. But the thing that shocked me the most was what you're supposed to do for maximum longevity: don't stick labels on them! Cripes! All those fancy labels are contributing to my bit rot!

  165. I think you mean it raises the question. by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Please read this for the correct usage of that term.

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

  166. That's what we need... by EaterOfDog · · Score: 0

    another optical disk format.

    --

    Crushing my karma one post at a time.
  167. CD rot not my experience by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

    I recently dug out the first CD I ever bought: Beethoven's 9th Symphony, recorded by the Berlin Philharmonic. I bought it when I bought my first CD player (duh) in 1984. I ripped it into iTunes last month :-). Still sounds CD-quality to me...

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  168. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is because the music sucks.

    When they are on TV you are distracted by how little clothing they have on.

  169. Re:CD rot is not scary.. but the guy holding it is by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1


    Hey Mark, glad to see you're still kicking and making international news. :-)

    (Old RW Math drone)

  170. I strongly suspect there's something else going on by eschasi · · Score: 1

    This fellow says that about 20% of his CDs have rotted. My collection is only about 600, but I have zero (count 'em) zero bad disks. I know this because last year I went back and ripped every one of them to MP3s. And chunks of my collection go back to the 80s like his does. If he's got a 20% failure rate, there's something wrong with the method or environment he's storing in.

  171. high cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CDs costs less than 5c to create, if it's something popular. they claim "high cost"? the booklet inserted probably costs more than CD itself.

  172. Actual cases of disc rot by figa · · Score: 1

    I have a bunch of CDs from the LAYLAH label that are rotting. The label has acknowledged this, and its disc supplier offers a replacement plan for discs that are still in print. specifically reissuing CDs that are known to rot. Mine still play, so I haven't tried to replace them yet. I own about half the CDs on their list.

  173. Force AOL to give up their secret by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

    AOL CD's don't rot. What gives?

    --
    This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    1. Re:Force AOL to give up their secret by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 1

      No, they just muliply

      --
      This signature was left intentionally blank.
  174. Anyone else not experienced this? by bonch · · Score: 1

    I have CDs I burned last decade that still work. I just keep them in a CD case and use them when I need to.

    Is it just me?

    I had one CD go bad once, where it looked like a pinprick whole in the data layer and I could see light coming through the other side...I ran my fingernail along the other side and easily created new holes, like the layer had gotten thinner. But this was a really used CD that I carted around a lot and was just a working backup I used in a ton of computers.

  175. Should read by bonch · · Score: 1

    Consumers have adopted a system by which multiple redundant backups are constantly made and remade.

    Should read:

    Consumers have adopted a system by which copyrighted materials are illegally distributed, thereby stomping over copyright holder rights, under the guise that they have the right to do it.

    You don't need P2P to make digital backups. Get real. Why would you bother with a lossy ripped version anyway when you could make your own APE file? Of course, with the bandwidth these days, people are pirating entire APE files now. But that doesn't matter to Slashdotters, the more the merrier, right?

  176. This is Slashdot by bonch · · Score: 0, Troll

    Didn't you know that Bill Gates said something about 640KB, Linux usage is going to overtake Mac usage, the iPod Mini is a failure...oh, yeah, and everyone is allowed to violate copyright holder rights and pirate everything "just because?"

    Everyone else understands that copyright holders have the rights to the distribution of their works. But Slashdot doesn't care about what artists want--they just care about furthering piracy for selfish reasons, ripping people off.

  177. Heck, I rarely even get a jewel case anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Related to games, almost every new game comes in paper slips now. It's a pain to index them now. >:(

  178. Honesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is no good if you're wrong, sometimes honesty displays overwhelming ignorance.

    Case in point:
    the Beatles got away with this repetative song stuff for fifteen years.

    a) They recorded music for 8 years.
    b) If you think their songs are repetitive, you're just an ass.

  179. I could...but shouldn't have to by MacFury · · Score: 1
    I could look around for ways to bypass their security..possibly landing in jail if they felt the need to prosecute me under the DMCA...they could as I'm bypassing a copyright protection scheme.

    My point is that I shouldn't have to commit illegal activities just to continue with the legal activities that were previously granted to me.

  180. You can hear and measure the degredation by ChaosMt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been saying this since CD's really hit the market. I was working in top 40 radio at the time we switched from vinyl to CDs. What I noticed is that CDs do degrade over time. It's like they lose their dynamic headroom, but not their fidelity. In other words, frequently played CDs had to be turned up a little more than others. I attributed this to the cheap alluminum (sp?) or the plastic oxidizing (or something) in the prescence of light.

    Maybe I'm crazy, but I'm sure I can reproduce this and it is easily measurable.

  181. Some words from Captain Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it. Sticky labels use glue. Glue contains solvents. Solvents eat plastic. CDs are made of plastic. Therefore sticky labels eat CDs. QED.

    And then there's the fact that improperly positioned labels can cause imbalances which make the CDs unreadable at high speeds.

    Sticky labels were never a good idea. It doesn't take much of an understanding of chemistry or physics to realize this.

    However, the article was about stamped, not burned CDs (the commercial CDs that were introduced in the early 80s and touted as lasting 10,000 years). Anyone who bought Deutsche Gramophon discs in the mid-90's would be aware of this problem, and there was an article about it in Electronics & Wireless World back in 1997.

    Once again, Slashdot brings us the latest, most up to date news.

  182. Re:Hey here's a--- solution --- by wiremind · · Score: 1

    Hard drives and RAID.

    1 PC with raid built into the motherboard (150bux)
    a few 120gig drives, with mirroring happening.(100bux a piece)
    when one of the drives fails, remove it, replace with new one.

    Everything i store, i want access to, if i have it stored on a tape its useless to me.

    Say its 1am on a saturday night, relaxing at home, pretty drunk, having a good time with some friends, and we decide we wanna watch Men In Black, ( divx backup on harddrive of course ) i browse over to server, media/video/m/ and start up the movie. now, if i was using tape backup for all the movies i've divx'ed this simply wouldnt be possible.

    re: running out of space,
    i have 240 gigs of space right now, all the dvd's i've divxed take up about 95 gigs, music is around 20 gigs. by the time i hit the 240 gig limit, harddrive space will have increased enough that i will replace the 120 gig drives with 200 or 300gig drives, which will increase my space to 400-600gigs, unless of course, i just buy another copy of the current setup, then i would ahve 400-600 + my current 240gigs so, almost a terrabyte, and i never had to spend more than 100 bux on any given part.

    Kyle

  183. MOD UP INFORMATIVE by Atragon · · Score: 1

    Parent is extremely informative. Post not funny.