Slashdot Mirror


Stopping Overseas Fax Spam?

iotashan asks: "Likely for most businesses, unsolicited faxes have become quite a problem. They needlessly use up toner and paper, and are usually just scams anyway. Specifically, we are receiving faxes from a company called Flamingo Travel. Now, they appear to bug business across the US, and some innocent parties are falling victim. I have used their automated system for having my fax number removed, to no avail. Is my only weapon having a bunch of friends call this 800 number to make the company's overseas toll-free phone bill unbearable?"

"The latest fax listed a number to call to take advantage of the offer (800-328-9795), so I called it and asked to be removed. The woman took down my number, but rather smugly told me that they are in England so they do not have to obey the US unsolicited fax laws. She wouldn't provide me with any other company information, and then stopped answering calls from my number after repeated hang-ups. The FCC says that it is a civil matter, and to go through the courts. The Fax Preference Service in the UK says they cannot help people outside the UK. Do I have nowhere to turn except an expensive lawyer, armed with no information about the company?"

439 comments

  1. Spam him back by CptChipJew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is my only weapon having a bunch of friends call this 800 number to make the company's overseas toll-free phone bill unbearable?

    That's really not such a bad idea. Being that they're in an other country and illegally spamming, you can assume they aren't going to attempt to prosecute somebody that they themselves have illegally wronged.

    Get a free VoIP service like Free World Dialup or something that lets you make 800 calls over the Internet. With most of them the caller ID shows up as random numbers across the US that they use to dial out. Then fax them tons and tons and tons of junk (read: goatse's) faxes through that.

    Or you could just automate your VoIP program to call them every 30 seconds. Rack up the bills and annoy the hell out of them. Didn't Scott Richer get really pissed off when everybody submitted his email address to zillions of email lists?

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or you could fax back a neverending loop of black paper. Always a fave around my office.

    2. Re:Spam him back by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I called the first time...she said reservations and I said that I would like to reserve some travel. She said something like she didnt know what I needed and hung up. I called again and said "I'm sorry, we seem to have been disconnected" to which she replied "I hung up on you because you dont know what you need"

      does anyone know what these people want to sell me so that I can lead them on a bit more?

      --
      Bottles.
    3. Re:Spam him back by ttldkns · · Score: 4, Informative

      sorry to spoil it for you all but cant it wait until morning? its like 11:26PM over here. there will be no one in that office!!

      D'OH!

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    4. Re:Spam him back by MukiMuki · · Score: 5, Informative

      A couple of karma-whoring things...

      Number 1 : Free World Dialup

      Number 2 : Why are you still using a fax machine? Get a cheap computer up on some fax software and you can auto-filter your faxes. Not to mention the savings you'll get from not using any toner. Then just lazer print anything worth keeping.

    5. Re:Spam him back by CptChipJew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just called and it hung up as soon as it answered.

      Congratulations, in 5 minutes they're already Slashdotted beyong annoyance!

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    6. Re:Spam him back by Karamchand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Be aware of the fact that it will stay a one time annnoyance if you call it once today. Therefor write down the number on a post it note, stick it to your monitor and call them now and them every day!

    7. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Request their fax number, and use the good ol' black-carbon paper in a loop trick to use up all their ink.

      Utilize american VOIP carriers to dial the 1800 number. In fact use their 800 number to test out new phone systems, and if you really want to get attention purchase a spot in your local newspaper "Call here for a possible technical position: 1800XXXXXX." There will be no end to their torment.

    8. Re:Spam him back by kemapa · · Score: 2, Informative
      A quick search with google reveals http://www.ftravel.ru/, a Russian site, but it is no longer up.

      There is a Google cache here, however.

      Maybe this is the over-seas company doing the faxing? I don't know, I can't read Russian , so I can't verify if the company discussed in the article is the same as this one.

      Oh and BTW the number for the company that is doing the faxing is 1-800-328-9795 for those who don't want to RTFA.

    9. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! They're just picking up and hanging up right away. :)

    10. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't make it, someone in France offered to do it for me. I actually think it's kind of funny.

    11. Re:Spam him back by Reby · · Score: 1

      Well I'll make a few calls for ya. I know at my office we get on average 3-5 spam faxes per night. It only takes a moment to throw them away but it is annoying. I've been known to set their 800 number on a modem redialer...I know its petty and childish but it feels good. I've thought about setting up a PC just to get faxes but havent had the time or spare equipment. Currently we use one of those cheap fax machines that you have to buy rolls of carbon paper (much like the ink cartridge scam). When you get 3-5 spams per day it really eats up toner and for what?? So some dickhead can send me SCO stock quotes?! Feh! I would have no problem with these companies if they sent out notices via mail (not email), but when they hijack my fax machine it tends to irk me.

    12. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Doesn't look like it's the same company, at least based on a quick glance at the Google cache (I read Russian fluently). The number listed on that page is (095) 200-35-81, 095 being the city code for Moscow. Not sure why the main site is down, but the cache looks like it was updated within the past week.


      -H

    13. Re:Spam him back by CaptBubba · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually this does work, and it works very very well.

      The trick is in the timing. call on Friday after buisness hours, and let it fax. Once the paper you are faxing starts to come through your machine, loop it back around and tape it together to form a nice continuous loop. I've heard of this fax continuing all weekend until somebody comes in Monday to shut it off.

    14. Re:Spam him back by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Ya, that's what I was going to suggest as well. Of course, if you're a company with an "800" fax number this still doesn't help with your phone bills, however it doesn't cost you any paper or toner.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    15. Re:Spam him back by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did a search to see if I could find any additional information and found that Flamingo Travel has incorrectly had calls going to their number. They have their front page modified to point people to the correct number as other posters have listed. They also have this link to fcc.gov for filing complaints against unwanted faxes.

      Sounds like some people have hit the wrong target.

    16. Re:Spam him back by yintercept · · Score: 4, Informative

      More than likely, the spammer will just end up sticking the phone company with the bill. If this effort generates enough traffic to actually make an impact on the spammer's finances, the spammer will probably be able to point to a malicious /. thread and get the phone company to absorb the charges.

      The other innocent group getting hit right now are people who have phone number similar to the spammer. As fat fingered /.ers dial away, about 1 out of every fifty calls is dinging an innocent bystander. (assuming that there are innocent people who have 800 numbers.)

    17. Re:Spam him back by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      hen fax them tons and tons and tons of junk (read: goatse's) faxes through that.

      Faxing the Goatse man? Probably not a good idea; I think it's considered international terrorism.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    18. Re:Spam him back by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get an air horn, call, and blast it into the receiver.

    19. Re:Spam him back by jcr · · Score: 1

      More than likely, the spammer will just end up sticking the phone company with the bill. ..and then the phone company will terminate his account. Repeat as necessary until there are no more phone vendors available to him.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    20. Re:Spam him back by number11 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is my only weapon having a bunch of friends call this 800 number to make the company's overseas toll-free phone bill unbearable?

      Do remember that the recipient of an 800 call gets your phone number reported to them.

      Calling from a pay phone will prevent you from receiving phone-spam (or legal) retribution.

      In the US, calling from a pay phone has an additional benefit: the recipient is charged ~$0.35 per call to compensate the owner of the pay phone for the money you're not putting in. So if you don't get the information you need the first time, keep calling back until you do.

    21. Re:Spam him back by skzbass · · Score: 1

      OR... You could post this number on a highly trafficked tech forum site. It would be the first ever case of a Slashdotted fax machine

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    22. Re:Spam him back by MrChuck · · Score: 3, Interesting
      1. stop using a fax machine.
        In 1993, we used Hylafax. We sent things out THROUGH it (and a row of modems) and we received faxes through it. It never needs to hit paper.
        We had a machine to send stuff OUT of on occasion (like a filled out form), but didn't take IN on that line.
        In days of yore, we just showed the first page and someone could route it by that. Privacy issues were pretty moot as it was replacing a pile of paper that the administrators (secretaries) piled through).
        Junk Fax? Delete.
        Need to have it on paper? Fine, print it. About 20% ever needed to become paper.

      A Friend ordered some new modem (28.8kb). Needed it the next day. Coached them on how to send it international (he was in canada for 2 weeks on a job site with no access). "Sir, we do this all the time." And yet they screwed it up. Nothing in the promised AM. Noon. PM. The next morning, he's written a long 4 page screed. In large print, 3 thrice a page, he has in 100 pt font, "Call me: My number is..."
      Prints it on a trusty dotmatrix as one sheet.
      He "dials around" the tech supports local(ish) direct number until he gets a fax squeal.
      Feeds the fax. Tapes the ends together.

      After 90 minutes, the phone rings. "Are you .....?"

      Yes, did you get my fax? ... really? wow, my machine must be screwed up. But not like your shipping dept is. Where's my damn modem you charged me for a swore up and down would be here yesterday?

      Faxing them back won't make a difference. It will cost you. Perhaps a smart fax modem program with caller ID set with an access list (ala sendmail: Block THESE countries).

    23. Re:Spam him back by skzbass · · Score: 1

      dumbass - to myself. wow shoudla RTFA. im gonna get offline to do a service to the community for a while

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    24. Re:Spam him back by JAD+lifter · · Score: 1

      I just called it and the number rang about ten times with no one answering it before I got bored and hung up.
      If your computer uses a modem it shouldn't be to hard to write a script that makes your computer just keep calling the number over and over again.

    25. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an illegal sex tour company.

    26. Re:Spam him back by jfdawes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, ... I can't help myself....

      My new business model:

      1) Buy a bunch of pay phones and install them in a big room.
      2) Hook them up to computers/modems/whatever
      3) Call 1-800 numbers found on spam faxes/junk email all day and night.
      4) Profit!!!

      At $0.35 a call, how long does it take to pay for the pay phone?

    27. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that they get your phone number via ANI, as well...

    28. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while your off line, i've come up with a great idea!!!!1111

      How about we post the number to a highly visible tech site, and we'll all slashdot the fax machine...

      oh wait

    29. Re:Spam him back by mike300zx · · Score: 1

      I just called and it just rings and rings with no answer. Guess they've caught on. Do we have another phone #?

    30. Re:Spam him back by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      Lay off the caffiene.

    31. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use CLIR

    32. Re:Spam him back by badman99 · · Score: 0

      Oh I dunno spam isn't such a bad thing.....Out here in Australia, I have just got one of those damn fangled mobile phone things. I would be glad just to get any phone call, even if they were sellin somethin. I get so lonely sometimes, I have to go down to the creek to wrestle some croc's to get some exercise. Hmmm have to get back to makin my furry koala hat....Somebody give us a call I'm bored :) +61405685723

    33. Re:Spam him back by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      When you call them, give them something fun and creative to listen to, like the Gay Bar song by Electric Six.

      Ah, good times...

      --
      this is my sig
    34. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or you could just automate your VoIP program to call them every 30 seconds. Rack up the bills and annoy the hell out of them.

      Or automate it even further by every time you use a public restroom, write on the wall with a sharpie, "For a good time call 800-328-9795."

      Kinda like a shell script written in english.

    35. Re:Spam him back by chrisfnet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why doesn't everyone sign up for an account here for the free month. Send a month's worth of faxes to the company... everyone.

      After a few hundred thousand faxes, I bet the company would reconsider it's marketing practices.

    36. Re:Spam him back by AndyCap · · Score: 1

      Do you really think any of these operations have a paper fax? And at 14.4kbps max you'll have a hard time filling the average harddrive over the weekend. Perhaps you might tickle a bug in their fax software But that'll be all.
      --

    37. Re:Spam him back by whittrash · · Score: 1

      I already patented that business model.

    38. Re:Spam him back by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Feeds the fax. Tapes the ends together.

      OMG. That's a great one. I'm going to have to remember it :)

      Nothing beats some of the stuff that my company faxes out. We scan tons of documents and wind up faxing them all over gods country. Some of the outgoing faxes in our log take over an hour to transmit. I'd love to "accidentally" fax a few of those bad boys to the people that keep spamming us -- most if it is gibberish anyway if you aren't in our line of business. Would be fun to rack up their 800 bill though.

      I've always wondered how hard it would be to automate the process of continually pressing the number to repeat your options in a voice menu system. Setup a program to do that and leave it running on an unused phone line for a few weeks.

      Faxing them back won't make a difference. It will cost you. Perhaps a smart fax modem program with caller ID set with an access list (ala sendmail: Block THESE countries).

      We've automated sending some of our junk to the trash with our fax server -- but it's still a pain. The software we use won't let us hang-up on them -- it just let's us delete them after received. In all likelihood that's the better way because they won't keep calling you trying to transmit. But it's still a pain in the ass because our incoming fax line is tied up for however long it takes them to transmit that -- meanwhile legitimate business that makes money sits in a queue somewhere because our line is busy. Annoys me just on principal.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    39. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to forget that the phone company is still highly regulated, which makes it extremely difficult to deny service. Most likely the reverse spam will be absorbed by the public at large.

    40. Re:Spam him back by CaptBubba · · Score: 1

      That isn't the point. The point is to tie up the phone for as long as possible. As it is an 800 number, they get charged for the call. Even if they get the number for 5 cents a minute, a weekend long fax could easily cost them $150 for no return. Also, with you on the line, there is the possibility that those who are actually interested in the service will be unable to get through.

    41. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... I know that is the official line. But, we have never actually had the fee leveled on us. This is since 1996 with many different carriers!

      I'd just assume they are immune to this so called charge.

      BTW, we always charged our customers the fee... got to pocket the extra cash.

    42. Re:Spam him back by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      The problem with these links is that we don't know if there are 30 "Flamingo Travel" places in the world. The best thing to do would be to call the phone # 800-328-9795, and ask them if they have a web site, and that you'd like more info.

    43. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess spelling is not important for travel agents.

    44. Re:Spam him back by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Faxing them back won't make a difference. It will cost you. Perhaps a smart fax modem program with caller ID set with an access list (ala sendmail: Block THESE countries).

      Take it a step further, instead of blocking those countries, make the fax drop down to the slowest possible speed. If possible (software modem/fax?) fake a bunch of bad transmits and request resends (does the fax protocol even do that?) so as to tie up their system as long as possible. Of course, it would be bad if you didn't have multiple incoming lines behind your fax number, else you'll just DoS yourself too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    45. Re:Spam him back by BasharTeg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hang on a second,

      You think you're getting back at the spammer, but here's what's really happening. I work for a mid-sized toll free 800 services provider. These bastards sign up for our services, pay the first month's cost on the system, advertise illegally, and then never pay the cost of the usage. They collect whatever amount of successful business they get, many times by spamming starting Friday night so we don't get the complaints and shut them down until Monday morning, and then when we cancel their system for abuse, they don't pay the usage bill, which is often a flood of callers screaming at them in voicemail. Then a few of the callers look up who manages the 800 number of the spammer, figure out it is our company, and they call us and scream and/or report us to the FCC or FTC for spamming, when we're not the ones doing it. This is a very very common problem for 800 toll free services providers. There is little we can do to stop it. We rapidly answer supoenas from Attornies General of states, and we report these spammers to the FCC, including every bit of information we can gather regarding the spammer. Sometimes the systems are purchased with fake credit cards. We try to ban their names and aliases, and we have a person who visually screens the orders for known spammers and fake looking orders. With all of our efforts, and by complying with all telecom regulations and reporting fraud and phone/fax abuse to the FCC, we still suffer from these morons every month. There's nothing to stop some fax spammer from getting a new name, new credit card, buying an 800 number, fax spamming up a storm, and putting that 800 number they bought from us as the call-back number.

      Now, we do NOT allow people to abuse our outbound fax system for the spamming, this is typically done either with their own equipment or through some spam-friendly service. Our fax system doesn't allow faxing to large enough groups of numbers for anything but standard office groupware type faxing. All of our outbound services are heavily monitored for abuse.

      My point is this: You think by flooding the 800 number with phone calls and wasting their minutes that you are punishing the spammer. That's assuming the bastard is going to pay his bill, when quite frequently, he is not. We end up paying his bill while we do everything possible to rapidly kill spam accounts and report them to authorities. If you really want to help resolve this problem, the proper response is to report them to the FCC. If the FCC receives enough complaints, they act and people get taken down (we've seen it). You can easily fill out the abuse report form located here on the FCC's site: http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cib/fcc475.cfm

      Please, understand that unlike email spammers who have positive relationships with their providers, phone providers are actually under the gun with the FCC and rarely do they ever willingly partake in phone/fax spamming which is clearly illegal under FCC and FTC regulations. Since they aren't working with us in a positive relationship, they know they can screw us and not pay their bill.

    46. Re:Spam him back by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sounds to me like this vigilante response is working perfectly. By putting pressure on you, the 800 service provider, the rabid posse is keeping the problem in check. You are highly motivated to remove the spammer and to not sign up their accounts. That seems to be the desired response.

      I don't know anything about your business or the size thereof, but there are lots of ways to prevent getting scum for customers. You could only sign up customers with D&B numbers, require an audited credit statement, and so forth. Sounds to me like you want to not screen customers very carefully and also not endure the problems associated with bad customers.

    47. Re:Spam him back by number11 · · Score: 1

      My new business model

      Set aside some money for lawyers. Somebody's already tried that business model (though I don't think they limited themselves to spammer 800 numbers), and got caught (I couldn't locate a link to the story, but I remember reading it). IIRC they're doing time & charges now.

    48. Re:Spam him back by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      Feeds the fax. Tapes the ends together.

      Timing is everything.

      Best time to start is late on Friday. Check the next day to see if there is an error message. If so, someones going to have a headache on Monday. I used to do this to fax spammers.

      -cp-

      President Bush to Liberate Alaska!

    49. Re:Spam him back by CmdrTHAC0 · · Score: 1

      "fake a bunch of bad transmits and request resends (does the fax protocol even do that?)"

      Yes. In places with crappy lines, it's best to override the speed negotiation and set it to a sane value. (Say 9600 bps if the lines can't handle 14400. These are mildly random numbers because my father does this, not me.) Otherwise the fast line speed, which negotiation accepted because the short test burst worked without error, creates too many retransmits and falls behind on average.

      --
      __CmdrTHAC0__
      In Soviet Russia, Spanish Inquisition doesn't expect YOU!!
    50. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can almost understand USAians changing words because they think thats the way they should be spelt, however LASER is an acronym. Zimulated.. yeah, right.

    51. Re:Spam him back by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      Since the S stands for Stimulated, that would become Ztimulated

    52. Re:Spam him back by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 0

      What is the number you called? I'm bored.

      --

      --
      What would Bill Clinton do?
    53. Re:Spam him back by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Nor is getting a properly functioning webpage where half of the text isn't clipped off.

    54. Re:Spam him back by bigchris · · Score: 1

      FLAMINGO TRAVEL, INC.

      713-782-4343
      flamingotravel@msn.com

      Could this be it?

    55. Re:Spam him back by markwusinich · · Score: 1

      Yea,I don't know where you are, but in Delaware there are no more pay phones. High Schools and some malls, but that is it.

      I got lost going to an interview in DE and when I looked for a pay phone, I was told to try the High School, and that all of the pay phones were removed like five years ago.

    56. Re:Spam him back by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the time zone difference in England..

    57. Re:Spam him back by Brobock · · Score: 1

      The fax back address probably is stored on a computer as a pcx file and probably doesn't cost them that much paper or ink.

    58. Re:Spam him back by Luban+Doyle · · Score: 1

      A closed loop of black paper!%#@%$((

      As revenge goes this is priceless. What I first thought of was call blocking. It could turn out to be somewhat labor-intensive since you would have to use the keypad to dial *70 or whatever the code is right after one of the junk faxes came in. It also requires that you pay the monthly fee for caller ID/blocking. And getting rid of the fax machine is also a good idea. Combining all 3 seems like a win-win-win solution.

    59. Re:Spam him back by jaelle · · Score: 1

      Payphones in my area will not accept 800 number calls.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    60. Re:Spam him back by BasharTeg · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like you want to not screen customers very carefully and also not endure the problems associated with bad customers.

      If only you knew what you were talking about. As I said before, we visually inspect new orders, we implemented a social security number checking system powered by TransUnion, and we've taken many other steps to filter our incoming clients for abuse, even though it would be highly profitable for us to simply let them sign up and not cancel their accounts (they continue to pay for the service unless you cancel them as a general rule). Yet another example of how nothing a company or corporation does, no matter what kind of steps they take, nothing satisfies the anti-corporate anti-spam type crowd. They know they can't attack the businesses responsible, so instead they attack abused service providers, implying that we aren't doing enough since the problem isn't solved. Claiming that a business should DNA test their customers to look for genes that mean the person will grow up to be an unsolicited advertiser.

      It's real easy to point the finger and claim we don't do enough, but we're the ones paying the phone bills for these assholes and for your "revenge" on them, so obviously it is in our interest to do everything we can to block them from using our service while trying to remain competitive with much larger 800 number providers like AT&T.

      Oh, and as much as we don't like paying their phone bills, the cost is typically a penny a minute or less, so if you think a couple die hard "vigilantes" are going to seriously impact the bill as opposed to the thousands of other people calling in asking to be removed from the guy's fax list, you're kidding yourself. The real world runs on bigger numbers than the number of penny/minutes a couple thousand dorks can rack up while they feel like they're doing something to "solve the problem."

      While you're stereotypically attacking the closest business involved, why not find a way to blame Microsoft for part of this? I mean, some of our computers here (although not the servers), run Windows. Therefore, Microsoft makes the operating system that powers the business that provides the 800 number that the illegal fax spammer uses to make money from his illegal faxing. Go get em tiger!

    61. Re:Spam him back by gammelby · · Score: 1
      Actually a really interesting idea for re-spamming traditional spammers! After having had spamassassin flag a message as spam, make some script scan it for toll free numbers - if found, it invokes your favorite scriptable command line VoIP client (though I doubt such a wonder exists).

      Ulrik

    62. Re:Spam him back by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1
      See, you didn't address my point at all. D&B, and auditors, are good ways to screen clients. Social security is not a good way to screen anyone, because every jackass in the entire country has a social security number, even the criminals.

      For fax spammers in the USA, we have a wonderful recourse. We can simply refer the matter to the courts and claim our treble damages with certainty of success. But for Sophisticated International Fax Terrorists(TM), there's little to do but bite back.

    63. Re:Spam him back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the past I serviced, repaired, programed fax machines. I'm an authorized Mita, Panasonic, and Canon fax tech.
      The number listed on the recieved fax is programed in and dialing it is no assurance that your going to connect to the senders machine.
      You need to print the logs and make sure the numbers match before doing this.
      If I were to program in some other phone number to be printed you could be targeting the wrong entity.
      Printing out endless reams of black faxes to the NSA or the Whitehouse would probably generate a knock on your door PDQ.
      I'd be suprised if anyone doing this had the same sending and recieving fax or have the recieving fax on a toll free number in fact I don't ever recall any fax I've ever installed on a toll free number.
      Actions like this will get them placed on 900 numbers with $15.00 per min connect fees.

    64. Re:Spam him back by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1
      Get a cheap computer up on some fax software and you can auto-filter your faxes. Not to mention the savings you'll get from not using any toner. Then just lazer print anything worth keeping.
      Excellent idea! Good thing my laser printer runs on over-ripe banana peel!
      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    65. Re:Spam him back by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      im in california, time difference to england is +9 hours, so posting/calling at 5 pm my time (PST) would be 2 am their time...

    66. Re:Spam him back by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I'm replying to myself, but I just called again today and when a man picked up I got "answering service"

      I asked him if he had disney world tickets and he said "this is an answering service." he asked me what I was looking for and and I said flamingo travel...I got a negative answer and "is there anything else I can help you with."

      Is it working? is our work done?

      --
      Bottles.
    67. Re:Spam him back by susieq12345 · · Score: 1

      no are work is not done you are calling the wrong people the spamers numbers are as follows 800-456-0034 800-456-9302 800-676-8028 800-349-0569 they are located in casselbery fl the owner is steve dickerson

    68. Re:Spam him back by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the solution is to have the TCPA law and damages apply to the telecom service providers as well and equally.

      Then they would get their head right, there would be a liability for them to sign up spammers, junkfaxers, etc.

      There are many ISPs, telecom providers, etc. who are losing money, or nearly so. They badly want the revenue from the shady customers who fill our inboxes with crap while pretending to be white hat.

      If they had definite liability for the people the agree to do business with things would be better. For us, maybe not for them, at least in the short term. The phone companies are loathe to take responsibility for what their customers do. But it's way past time they did. And the government is gonna have to jamb that responsibility down their throat.

      --
      .
  2. Consistency here will be key by Humba · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we should have a consistent answer to the guy who answers the 800 number. Something like "Sorry, wrong number. Bork bork." ?

    --H

    1. Re:Consistency here will be key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Sorry wrong number

      I think he means:
      "You can get anything you want
      at Alice's restaurant"...

    2. Re:Consistency here will be key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant..."

  3. Solutions: by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1, Troll

    Block the number or get rid of your fax machine. .

    1. Re:Solutions: by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a few free long-distance fax networks out there. Some or all of the members have a phone line, and faxes are sent online to someone who's computer can dial the number locally.

      As a result you may receive both legitimate and spam faxes from the same number. Most companies will send faxes directly over the phone, but individuals or thrifty small businesses have a fair chance of sending them by either method.

      Since they're spamming, they're probably not paying long distance charges.

  4. Wardial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get a lot of your friends to repeatedly call the number with their modems. They repeatedly fax you, why not rub it back in their faces?

    1. Re:Wardial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Here's several off the top stack of our overflowing recycle bin, please, add them to your list:

      Service/alleged "removal" number
      800-413-2767/888-211-4409
      800-609-9001/86 6-256-6966
      800-456-0034/877-405-4260
      800-334-352 8/866-266-8193
      800-418-5754/877-203-8926
      866-681 -2460/800-869-2235
      800-929-6917/800-658-8132
      800 -513-7431/877-201-7599

  5. /.ing by Bobdoer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdoting a fax line...I like it! And it's for a moderately good cause. How can you beat that?

  6. Solution by bobthemuse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Call them under a pseudonym, tell them you want to place an order for group travel for your company, have them fax a quote to you. Chances are they will use their real fax machine (programmed with their real phone number) instead of the auto-dial bank. If you can scam them under the pretenses of faxing an order, that's even better. Have a local (or use cheap voip service) to spam them back a copy of their advertisement, marked up liberally with a black marker.

    While it probably won't get you off the list, it will make you feel better.

    1. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yipes,

      The last thing I'm gonna do is give those clowns my fax number.

    2. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's already being spammed, then they already have his fax number. In fact, if he's calling in an order based on an ad they sent him, they would have no reason to try and add him to the database.

      Otherwise, use the second option, where you ask to fax in a large order for a quote. Might be a little obvious though....

    3. Re:Solution by erobertstad · · Score: 1

      No why would you go though all that trouble of talking to 'em? Just setup a quick dial-up connection with a 1 second redial and around 15000 retries and goto bed. :) who uses their modem these days anyway?

    4. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go dig up a list of stolen card numbers from about 2 years ago and get people to book their travel with those card numbers. As soon as Visa sees them using a bunch of known stolen card numbers, they will yank the mercant account.

    5. Re:Solution by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      That is an amazing use of the internet, AC, and a very devious technique that I shall keep in my arsenal. Thank you!

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  7. Reminds me of an old trick by youngerpants · · Score: 5, Funny

    tape 2 a4 sheets of black paper together lengthways, feed into fax machine and send. When the fax starts to feed through, tape together into a loop and leave it.

    That'll use up their toner :)

    1. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by gclef · · Score: 1

      Make sure the paper's black, though.

    2. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by andyrut · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or even better - you could fax them a page with equal quantities of red, blue, green, and black so it sucks up their color fax toner too!

    3. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tape 2 a4 sheets of black paper

      Make sure the paper's black


      This won't work unless the paper's black. Remember, the color of the black paper must be black because it won't work unless it's black. Black. The color of the paper that is. It needs to be black.

    4. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by apankrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That'll use up their toner :)

      Yeah, that's assuming there is a toner to use up.

      Ie it's not the pentium box with a fax-modem and huge harddrive on other end as every normal computer telephony company would have.

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    5. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by samj · · Score: 1

      For bonus points, draw paw/foot prints on the paper. For maximum effect, ensure the victim has an old thermal paper fax machine which will spew out metres of prints, then run out of paper and refuse to accept any more jobs.

    6. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      I dunno... How big does a received fax file get after a loop like the one described above?

      If the sheet is all black, it's easy to compress. I guess what you really need is a couple of sheets with fine, random dot patterns on them that would be difficult to arrange into nice, compressable bitstreams. What would that be, some kind of theoretical maximum entropy arrangment of bits?

    7. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

      Ok Then that will just fill up their hard drive.

      --
      Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    8. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tape 2 a4 sheets of black paper together lengthways, feed into fax machine and send. When the fax starts to feed through, tape together into a loop and leave it."

      That could be even funner than it sounds. Certain older thermal-paper fax machines would actually burst into flames after a certain amount of this! No joke. :)

    9. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is ... make sure the paper's black, yes?

    10. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But would it work with white paper too?

    11. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      are you sure about that ? black I mean? not midnight grey or satin black, but regular flat black? what if it's velvet black?

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    12. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't have black paper, a length of black electrical tape over the scanner optics also works. Just remember to remove it when you want to send a real fax.

    13. Re:Reminds me of an old trick by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      Well, the simple answer to this would be to compress something with the same codec used in a fax machine (CCITT IIRC) and then dump the binary image onto the page. Hey presto! Pretty uncompressible...

  8. Re:gyahahahahahha by rackman · · Score: 1

    This sounds good to me. Shall me commence to /.ing there phone system?

  9. Well... by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you sure the return number is even theirs?

    1. Re:Well... by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      Eh? You don't even have to read the article on this one:

      "The latest fax listed a number to call to take advantage of the offer (800-328-9795), so I called it and asked to be removed. The woman took down my number, but rather smugly told me that they are in England so they do not have to obey the US unsolicited fax laws.

      They obviously don't care about sending unsolicited faxes.

    2. Re:Well... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the summaries always contain accurate information, right? It's not like the editors would have called up the number to verify the information (they don't even check links!) so, while this may be legitimate, it *is* possible to Joe-job someone using Slashdot.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Well... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Well, if they're beyond the law, then hire some unemployed Spetsnaz troops to explain your displeasure to them. Cheaper than lawyers, and probably far more effective..

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  10. Aren't fax machines old school? by HBI · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems to me that you could just rig up a computer to accept faxes, using ANI or caller id to refuse to accept anything you didn't get valid info for.

    Set the jobs to auto-print and you are set. Use the old fax machine for outbounds only, rig it to not answer.

    Woops, sorry, this solution requires more effort than plugging the machine into the wall. How could I have even brought it up.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Aren't fax machines old school? by navig · · Score: 1

      Best not to reject faxes from older machines or questionable configurations. You would be amazed at how many really old fax machines are still in use.

      The real problem is wasted toner, paper and a pile of time consuming spam faxes every morning.

      I set up a small office to solve this problem. The staff continued to use their trusted manual fax machine and all incoming faxes arrived on the computer.

      The manual fax machine was set to answer the phone after nine rings. The pc answered after two. Even if the staff accidentially turn off the computer or the computer hangs, the stand alone fax still picks up. No increased risk of losing faxes.

    2. Re:Aren't fax machines old school? by HBI · · Score: 1

      That's a reasonable solution. The ANI fixes the problem in such a way that I only wish we could do with spam email.

      You might run into some problems with military bases but all private PBX systems are required to hand out a legit response to ANI at this point. Those that don't are probably purposely concealing their origin and you don't want to hear from those.

      I personally have to avoid such solutions because I DO get calls from a government installation. Anyone who doesn't has very little excuse.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Aren't fax machines old school? by iotashan · · Score: 1

      Last week, I did switch the company away from the paper fax to a fax server made by a company who I dare not mention *hangs head in shame*. So, I did stop the bleeding of supplies, but it is still DARN ANNOYING.

  11. Caller ID by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 0

    And program it not to answer their number. Pretty simple, really.

  12. Blocklist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you have the telco block the number(s) sending you crap?

  13. Sure by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you're reading this, dial 1-800-328-9795.

    One call won't hurt. Keep them on the line as long as possible. Ask what they're wearing and when they stopped beating their kids and stuff.

    1. Re:Sure by chimpo13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I called. It rang once and went silent. Tried calling again, some guy answered. I asked if they'd gotten tons of calls, and he said nope. But he's "looking forward to it because that's what we do". Not sure what he meant, I suppose I should try calling again.

    2. Re:Sure by Reby · · Score: 2

      I got thru and asked if they were busy, he replied 'No just some a$$es like you' and then he hung up...lol apparently he's having a bad phone day...BWHAHAHA!

    3. Re:Sure by nacturation · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're reading this, dial 1-800-328-9795. One call won't hurt.

      Or will it? Now that you've called them, they have your phone number -- ANI displays your number even if you block caller id from being sent. Because you called them, likely from your home number, doesn't that consitute a business relationship with them? Perhaps now you'll start getting tons of phone calls to your number, and they won't be unsolicited.

      The best thing is to write down the number and take it with you. If you happen to pass by a phone booth (or hotel courtesy phone, or...) on the way to lunch or something, pick it up and make the call.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Sure by Steve+B · · Score: 2, Funny
      Now that you've called them, they have your phone number

      A pay phone fifteen miles away from my house gives them my home phone number?

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    5. Re:Sure by nacturation · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dumbass... I never said they had your home phone number. Didn't you read the part about "likely from your home number"? But even if you missed that, surely you read the part later on where I recommended calling from a phone booth?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:Sure by lost_n_confused · · Score: 2, Informative

      A far better reason to use a pay phone is they are charged an access fee of $.40 or more for each call. So use pay phones and call them 10,000 times kinda ruins their VOIP savings.

      --
      -- To mess up an OS X box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it.--
  14. I just called the 800# by JesseL · · Score: 4, Funny

    I asked how many people have let them know how despicable fax smapping is now. The woman answering said nonchalantly "Oh, not very many". I let her know they'd be getting a lot more very soon now.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    1. Re:I just called the 800# by Leffe · · Score: 1

      Working the night shift, eh? It should be 23:23 in the UK :/

      I guess they'll have to work on a +8 schedule or something.

    2. Re:I just called the 800# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they've probably outsourced the operation to India, and some poor bastard is choking on his curry as the phone rings off the wall.

    3. Re:I just called the 800# by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      *on*
      Beep boop boop beep beep boop boop beep boop boop beep.
      *ring*
      *ring*
      Unintelligable greeting.

      "Hello, has anybody told you how despicable fax spamming is?" ... ...
      *click*

  15. Brit Slashdotters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Surely there must be at least a few /. regulars who are located in England and could somehow facilitate a bit of legal pressure to be placed on these guys locally? They might not have standing to sue, but at least the point would get across...

    -H

    1. Re:Brit Slashdotters? by genzil · · Score: 1

      You bet, I'll be making a call in the morning :-)

    2. Re:Brit Slashdotters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uh... A spammer told you they were in England -- and you BELEIVED them ?

      I say old chap...

    3. Re:Brit Slashdotters? by FashionNugget · · Score: 1

      Do you have any of their local contact information? Phone numbers or fax numbers or such? I'd be happy to join the battle, in that case.

    4. Re:Brit Slashdotters? by Jumpin'+Jon · · Score: 1

      Tell you what... see if someone can find out their address and I'll send Big Ron round "for a chat", 'k. Sor'ed.

      JJ

  16. International Law anyone by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The woman took down my number, but rather smugly told me that they are in England so they do not have to obey the US unsolicited fax laws. She wouldn't provide me with any other company information, and then stopped answering calls from my number after repeated hang-ups. The FCC says that it is a civil matter, and to go through the courts. The Fax Preference Service in the UK says they cannot help people outside the UK.

    Now, I don't know about some third world countries, but isn't there a treaty that says something like "If a law is illegal in our country, your 'citizen' can't do it in our country.

    1. Re:International Law anyone by Lucky+Kevin · · Score: 1

      No.

      --
      Kevin
      "It's not the cough that carries you off, it's the coffin they carry you off in" O. Nash
    2. Re:International Law anyone by JesseL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That should be news for all the people that come from places where gambling is illegal, vacationing in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, etc.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    3. Re:International Law anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, I don't know about some third world countries, but isn't there a treaty that says something like "If a law is illegal in our country, your 'citizen' can't do it in our country.

      Your country's courts only have power in your country. Aside from extradition (which doesn't happen for civil issues) they have no power over people outside the country.

    4. Re:International Law anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, yes. Its not a treaty, its just how laws work.
      If something is illegal in our country, no-one can do it in our country. Otherwise, dudes from Holland could spark up in any country they liked just cos its (semi) legal in their country. duh.

    5. Re:International Law anyone by GeekyGurkha · · Score: 1

      I don't know about such a treaty, but I do know that the UK has some anti-spam laws. You sign up to a list with your phone & fax numbers, and email addys, postal addys and the like, and it becomes illegal to start directing unsolicted advertising to those numbers/addresses. We're on it, and we don't get any ad calls or posted advertising junk. I don't see why you couldn't put a foreign fax number onto that list Infact, if I remember correctly, it's illegal to send unsolicited advertising faxes at all, but only to individuals... If you can find some details of this company... The Fax Preference service I can't see anything on there either way about registering an overseas number to not be faxed. Hope it helps

      --
      Hey! What pretty widgets?
    6. Re:International Law anyone by psiphiorg · · Score: 1

      >> Now, I don't know about some third world countries, but isn't there a treaty that says something like "If a law is illegal in our country, your 'citizen' can't do it in our country.["]

      > That should be news for all the people that come from places where gambling is illegal, vacationing in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, etc.

      Other way around. That should be news for all the people that come from places where gambling is legal, vacationing in places where it's not.

      Someone who lives in Las Vegas can't gamble when they're in Nogamblingsville, because gambling is illegal in Nogamblingsville. But someone from Nogamblingsville *can* gamble when they're in Las Vegas, because it's legal in Las Vegas.

      Likewise, someone from the UK can't junk-fax when they're in the United States, because junk-faxing is illegal in the United States.

      The question remains, however, whether somebody using a telephone in the UK could legally be considered "in" the US, for the sake of the junk-fax law, when they call a US phone. I would guess probably not, though perhaps they can.

      davidh

    7. Re:International Law anyone by IIH · · Score: 1
      "If a law is illegal in our country, your 'citizen' can't do it in our country.

      That should be news for all the people that come from places where gambling is illegal, vacationing in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, etc.

      You've got it the wrong way around, the original poster meant that someone from Las Vagas (where gambling is legal, can't go to a place where it's illegal and expect to be able to continue just because it's legal at home.

      IOW, when you travel, you don't take your laws with you, although some countries do take the stance that their citizens are subject to their domestic laws even when abroad, so can be procescuted for actions aboard, even if those actions were legal where they are located at the time, so your comment would be valid in that case.

      --
      Exigo spamos et dona ferentes
  17. the 800 number is not ./ed yet by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

    I got through just fine. In fact I continue to get through, again and again and again and again.............

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:the 800 number is not ./ed yet by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Maybe they outsourced their call center to a larger company that handles orders for many clients and can scale to a bigger, and much more expensive, /.ing.

      Their operators may not know about the illegal fax bombardment the company has been sending, so be sure that they do.

    2. Re:the 800 number is not ./ed yet by OddHackGEA · · Score: 1

      You might use a pay phone to call the 800 number.

      That way, it will cost them an extra fee (35 cents per call, if I remember correctly) in addition to the time charges, which are probably just pennies.

      I call for every fax I get that lists a removal number (just once per fax).

  18. How much does this cost THEM? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, one thing I am missing, how much does it cost them? I mean f they are sending the faxes from UK, it will be too costly, but if they are sending it via some sort of internet relay, go after the relay - they are in the US and must obey laws. What am i missing here?

    -Em

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    1. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by ballylama · · Score: 3, Informative

      They are based in Florida.

      do a Google search on the 800 number.

      Found them in the BBB under the following:

      FLAMINGO TRAVEL
      2137 N Courtenay Pkwy Ste 23
      Merritt Island, FL 32953

      Local Phone Number: (321) 454-9070
      Fax Number: (321) 452-0606
      TOB Classification: Travel Agencies & Bureaus

    2. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      What I'm wondering, doesn't some Slashdot reader work for a Telco that runs the 1-800 number that can "accidentally" disconnect it?

      If you can find out what Internet relay they are using, "maybe caller ID" you could contact them about abusive practices. Ruin their whole business model.

      This is America, SUE EVERYONE! It's a constitutional right.

    3. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by lga · · Score: 1

      I don't think sending the faxes from here will cost them much.

      It is cheaper for me to call the USA from here in England than it is to call my familly in the same country - I can call America for 1p/min, but national calls cost me 2.5p/min. I also lived in Holland for a bit, and my phone bills went down because Holland-UK calls cost less than UK-UK calls. (1 euro cent/min)

      That must be capitalism at work.

    4. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by seizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      What am i missing here?

      Never mind VoIP; you're missing the incredibly cheap cost of international POTS calls originating from the UK. I can get 1 penny per minute (~1.6c/min) as an end-user to make calls to the USA (and Australia, France, etc). If I was a bulk business user, I'm sure I could get an even better price.

    5. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by erobertstad · · Score: 1

      This one seams to goto a voice mail box... I wonder how much memory it has...

    6. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Never mind VoIP; you're missing the incredibly cheap cost of international POTS calls originating from the UK. I can get 1 penny per minute (~1.6c/min) as an end-user to make calls to the USA (and Australia, France, etc). If I was a bulk business user, I'm sure I could get an even better price.


      Makes sense. I did not realize it gotten this cheap.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    7. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Excellent work. The OP really should contact the state attorney general. Rich people who become DAs / Attorneys General like cases like this because it can help boost them to an office of some sorts. Filing a complaint is free and they've got a great legal staff.

    8. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those bastards were the same ones who were sending email spam forging it to look like it was from me. I found out after I got some bounce messages from non-working AOL addresses. I submitted them to their ISP. At the time I didn't have any company address information to sue them for impersonation, just where the spam was advertising. Haven't had any bounced in a while.

      BTW they were running IIS (hah).

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    9. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by Habberhead · · Score: 1

      That address is less than 5 minutes from where I am right now...

      They seem to be closed for the night. (Or are hiding.)

      I'll have to make it a point to stop by on the way to work tomorrow. :-)

    10. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 5, Informative
      NO!

      http://www.flamingo-travel.com/Home/News.asp?ID=1

      -----------------
      We have been recieving phone calls from people angry that we are sending them fax specials like $99 to Disney and Kids Free. Please know that they are NOT coming from Flamingo Travel Group in Pennsylvania. They are coming from a company in Florida calling themselves Flamingo Travel. Their phone number is 1-800-328-9795 and they sell time shares.

    11. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by thogard · · Score: 1

      Same is true for Australia. Orange here allows mobile calls to the US (or UK and a few other places) for about 1/2 of what it costs to call a landline. Its because of huge interconnect fees the monoploy phone co (Telstra, BT) get for connecting calls of smaller phone compaines and they don't have to pay that for international calls.

    12. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by cft_128 · · Score: 1

      Actually you should have said YES! The grand parent found a place in Florida that was the source, you found a place in Pennsylvania that was saying they were not sending the faxes and that the bad company was in Florida. Seems like they both agree.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    13. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by iotashan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except my state's AG (Wisconsin) only has mail and phone as options for filing complaints :) I suppose I can call them tomorrow. :)

    14. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by bendelo · · Score: 1

      I mean f they are sending the faxes from UK, it will be too costly

      Calling the US from the UK is extremely cheap (ie less than 0.5 cent per minute in bulk).

    15. Re:How much does this cost THEM? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Don't let the filing bother you. I've used my state's AG several times successfully. Basically in both situations someone was trying to rip me off, told me they were going to put me in collections if I didn't pay, and if I didn't like it to sue them. One of Spitzer's (the AG) lackeys called up and said they would be sued and made an example of if they didn't respect our contract. My credit report is free and clear and the two con artists left me alone out of fear of what could happen to them.

  19. Telecoms Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the not some kind of telecoms firewall type thingy using caller ID? If not that I bagsy the patent!

  20. Too many fishy facts... by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 0, Informative

    This looks like an urban legend that got on /. The phone number listed above goes to a similarly named company with a different story. Flamingo Travel. They say the offending company is in Florida. Wait to get the full story before you set up your war dialers...

    --
    My user number is prime. Is yours?
    1. Re:Too many fishy facts... by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 5, Informative

      Scratch that, after searching a little more the number is right, dial away!!!!

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    2. Re:Too many fishy facts... by JesseL · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try reading your link again. It is the same one noted in the story regarding "innocent parties". The page you linked at flamingo-travel.com explains the the number (1-800-328-9795) does belong to the offending company.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    3. Re:Too many fishy facts... by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      yeah, I'm an idiot. I tried to get that post out quick in case we were calling some poor shmuck that just happens to have the same name. Now I look like a Karma whore. Maybe I'll troll for a while just to off-set the +5 insightfuls I just got. :)

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    4. Re:Too many fishy facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a truck?

  21. No fax by Rodrin · · Score: 1

    All the more reason to be glad I don't own, nor plan on owning a fax machine (PC Software included)

  22. Dial-a-thon by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    1-800-328-9795

    Lets not keep them waiting!

    1. Re:Dial-a-thon by spatley · · Score: 3, Informative

      Be careful, calling an 800 number may cost you $$
      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/tmarkg/tol lfre e.htm

    2. Re:Dial-a-thon by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Informative

      So use a pay phone. It's safer anyway because toll free numbers always get your caller ID even if you block it. Plus they actually get billed a surcharge to receive calls from payphones.

    3. Re:Dial-a-thon by jmichaelb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The solution is not vigilantism. Calling a number to harass the company and its employees is illegal, immoral and cannot be justified.

      This is a blatant call to action for vigilante harassment. It is irresponsible and unjustifiable to publish such an article.

      Yes, this company is scum sucking slime. If you call a toll-free just to harass them, so are you.

    4. Re:Dial-a-thon by fatman22 · · Score: 1
      So what do you suggest as an
      • effective
      alternative.
    5. Re:Dial-a-thon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one will stop these losers - not the FTC (see fax.com and the bazillion in fines they've racked up & never paid), the phone company, or anyone else. If they want to play like they're untouchable, and there's a way to do it, reach out & touch them.

      The employees are no better - they could be out breaking car windows & stealing radios instead of what they're doing. They'd still be parasites on society, but they could only hit 1 or 2 cars a day and probably make more than they do worrying the living hell out of thousands per day.

      I hope they get enough calls to cause their fax machines to combust.

    6. Re:Dial-a-thon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boo, hiss

    7. Re:Dial-a-thon by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Calling a number to harass the company and its employees is illegal, immoral and cannot be justified.

      How on earth can it be illegal, immoral, or unjustified to call a company that explicitly invited your call by sending the junk fax and explicitly including contact information? They really did initiate a "business relationship" -- you have a much more solid right to call them back than they did to fax you in the first place.

      At most, one could make a case that it would be harassment to repeatedly reply to the same message.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    8. Re:Dial-a-thon by jmichaelb · · Score: 1
      The obvious suggestion was that the company should be "slashdotted." That is, that they be harassed by a huge contingent of /. users in order that they would have to pay a huge phone bill. Indeed, many of the responses were quite direct in expressing such a mentality.

      There are systems and technologies for handling such things. The world doesn't need a vigilante group being judge, jury and executioner. Ever.

      It is too bad that you don't see that.

    9. Re:Dial-a-thon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then please describe the official way to stop this harrasment.

      I say fuck'em. They make their living harassing us.

  23. Who the hell.... by wpiman · · Score: 1

    uses a fax machine anymore anyways???

    1. Re:Who the hell.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. do you work at McDonalds or are you just still in high school? Businesses without fax machines are few and far between.

  24. First Call Made by rackman · · Score: 1

    I am gonna set up my key system to autodial every 5 minutes or so. The girl on the other end has no clue what she is about to get herself into with that fax system.

  25. CallerID blocker by bobthemuse · · Score: 1

    I wonder if such a product exists... something which sits between your phone line and the fax machine, if it sees a certain number, it kills the call.

    You could probably cobble something together using an old PC and a modem. Write a script which picks up the modem for a second then hangs up. This may cause them to redial several times, costing them money. Of course, it will tie up your incoming line as well.

    Dunno if this would be practical in your case, as caller id from a foreign country can show lots of weird stuff. As long as it's consistent and unique, could be a neat solution.

    1. Re:CallerID blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean something like this?

      Telemarketer Hang-up

      Ought not to be too hard to modify as you described.

  26. Stupid Question.. by \\ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why don't fax machines have whitelisting or blacklisting capabilities? Or do they?

  27. Somebody still uses fax machines? by Mjlner · · Score: 3, Funny

    Weren't they replaced by steam-powered typewriters or something?

    --
    Lemon curry???
  28. Bad timing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is showing up at 6:20pm-ish EST. That means it's 11:20pm-ish in the UK. So you probably won't get an actual person, just voicemail.

    1. Re:Bad timing... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      That's a good thing, people hang up, voicemail doesn't and it costs just as much!

  29. Something not to try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would not suggest having someone over in GB find their telephone circuit (ISDN-PRI, T1/E1, or whatever). Disconnect that line from the local telco provider (no need in creating collateral damage), and proceed to "test" the line.

    For proper testing equipment, keep in mind that a normal telephone circuit runs about 40 VDC with 200 VDC spikes when ringing (your mileage may vary). Data lines tend to be much more voltage limited. As such, application of high voltage, say from a Megger or a VanDeGraff Generator, may cause "issues" with the CPE.

    I would not recommend you do this, but then again, you are certainly welcome to use your imagination. Yes, the 220 VAC mains common in GB should create "interesting" results...

    1. Re:Something not to try by rackman · · Score: 1

      Return of the Green Box

  30. Black Construction Paper by jubitzu · · Score: 2, Funny

    I keep a piece of black construction paper next to my fax machine. Granted this does not work for all my spam messages, but anyone who is bold enough to send unsolicited order forms that are to be faxed to their fax machine will be running out of toner daily. Economic solutions to SPAM do exist!

    1. Re:Black Construction Paper by p4ul13 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They don't necessarily have to have toner in their fax machine in order to send these faxes to you. For that matter, they could (most likely) be sending the faxes through software.

      The black paper trick is nice and all, but probably will just end up making your phone line busy.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    2. Re:Black Construction Paper by MinusBlindfold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a good number of companies are using electronic storage systems for their incoming faxes these days. So instead of using up their paper and toner you're really just eating up space on a hard drive.

  31. yes consistency by nmbr6tech · · Score: 4, Funny

    When we call we tell them we are minuto sombato from nigeria. We have a million dollars we need to transfer into an account and we need there help.

  32. Yes by ArchieBunker · · Score: 5, Funny

    We kept getting junk faxes from some company with a 1-800 reply number. Well created a blank 250 page word doc that was nothing but a black background. It took half an hour to send the whole thing and I let it run for a few hours. Never heard back from them again.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better, make the first few pages a realistic request for quotes, and then follow it with 250 pages of black. Even if they're using a fax modem, if they see it looks real, they might click print, without realizing it has a ton of black following it.

      Probably only work once though.

    2. Re:Yes by darkfire5252 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please tell me you did it with a fax modem, and didn't print those sheets out. Using 2-3 and taping them into a loop works so much better.

  33. A question of scale. by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Funny
    Is my only weapon having a bunch of friends call this 800 number to make the company's overseas toll-free phone bill unbearable?


    Not a bad weapon if you consider Slashdot a bunch of friends.

    Wonder-slash powers activate!


    Form of a massive 800 number DoSing!


    Shape of a six digit phone bill!

    1. Re:A question of scale. by iotashan · · Score: 1

      Well, gosh-darn. I wish I realized that posting the number to ./ would make everyone call them. I wouldn't want the company to suffer any.

  34. Hylafax by Lennie · · Score: 1

    Just use Hylafax (Fax-server uses modem and Linux-computer), it doesn't use paper, unless you tell it too. :-)

    I deliver it to e-mail (fax2mail), so it's just like all other spam. All I still need is some PrettyGoodOCR-software to make it realtext, then I can filter them out. :-)

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
  35. Count me in. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a victim. I finally got so pissed off at them coming in at 2-4am to my home phone that doesn't even have a fax machine hooked up that I changed my number... Unfortunately the new number belonged to some guy that is in huge debt with his creditors and they call constently. Also I forgot that I would no longer be on Missouri's no call list so telemarketers were calling quite a bit too. I think no call has kicked in because the calls seem to have dropped. The were almost all automated calls which is interesting because before the MO No Call list most telemarketing was done by live people.

    If you guys want to organize a day where we call all the 800 numbers of spammers and junk faxers count me in. I've got a couple of numbers I've been collecting that I can throw into the pool.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Count me in. by XryanX · · Score: 1

      For the telemarketers, you can pick up a Telezapper for about $20 at Best Buy or a similar store.

      It seems silly, but it worked for me. It just removes your information from their automated dialing system, so after a few weeks the calls stop.

    2. Re:Count me in. by The+Vulture · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't work that easily.

      The idea is that the Telezapper (and devices like it) send out an SIT tone (the beeps that you get when you call a number and get the recording, "This number is not in service"). The telemarketing machines are supposed to recognize that and assume that the phone number isn't in service anymore (and thus, to avoid calling you again, which wastes time and money, remove you from the list).

      At the telemarketing company I worked for about six years ago (*hangs my head in shame*), even though the computer did the dialing, we'd get to listen once the connection was made, no matter what is was. It was then up to me to determine whether to add that number to the bit bucket (for that list) or not.

      So, depending on the setup the telemarketer has, it's easy enough to listen to the tone, and then wait for the person to answer the phone. Heck, I think that they have it automated by the dialing machines now.

      -- Joe

    3. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar problem. The way I resolved it was to tell them that so and so was deceased. This will take about a month, but they eventually get the idea. On occasion, when one spammer removes him from their list, they will propagate that to others that they've shared the list with.

    4. Re:Count me in. by XryanX · · Score: 1

      Hmm, interesting point indeed.

      I was merely speaking from my personal experience, in that it worked fine for me. Then again, I rarely answer my home phone on account of everyone knowing my cell phone anyhow.

      It also seems to me that a good portion of the calls that I was getting were during hours in which most people will be at work, so they wouldn't be there to answer the phone, and thus negate the "zapping".

      Now if only someone would invent a device to automatically delete the blank messages that get left when people hang up after the answering machine greeting ends.

    5. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> At the telemarketing company I worked for about six years ago (*hangs my head in shame*)

      Fuck you, cunt!!!

    6. Re:Count me in. by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      For the telemarketers, you can pick up a Telezapper for about $20 at Best Buy or a similar store.

      They're in the discount bin at the local Office Depot (or is that Max? Whichever). Evidently the DNC list undercut the demand.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  36. Glavin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why it's the AT-5000 Auto-Dialer! My very first patent. Aw, would you listen to the gibberish they've got you saying it's sad and alarming? You were designed to alert schoolchildren about snow days and such. Well, let's get you home to Frinky. Hope your wheels still work.

  37. Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it didn't, people wouldn't do it.

    I know somebody who runs a fax list. He's very religeous about getting you off his lists right away if you want off, but he's more liberal than I would prefer about what constitutes "opt in"...

    It works.

    He's getting business - lots of it. In his own words, he's "on a roll". It's cheaper and more effective to send junk faxes than to post legitimate ads in the trade magazines!

    He's not selling penis pills or anything like that - just an independent broker promoting his services, which services he otherwise competently provides.

    He'll continue this until the money runs out, like anybody else in his position.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Have you got a phone number? ...

      Hey, I COULD be legitimately interested... You never know.

    2. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by jcr · · Score: 1

      Well, don't protect the guilty. Contact info, location, description, please?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by taustin · · Score: 1

      The money will run out the beginning of next year, when the rules change. Then, he'll be breaking the law unless he has written premission, in advance, and prior business relationships no longer count.

    4. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pass a message along? ...
      Get a REAL JOB ASS HOLE!

    5. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep America beautiful - wait until your friend is asleep, sneak over to his house, and beat him to death with a length of copper pipe.

      While you're at it, tell him you're opting out.

    6. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by Alsee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, it "works".

      For $10 you can send a few thousand junk faxes, burn up a over a hundred dollars worth of toner and paper from the thousands of victimes, tie up thousands of fax machines blocking in-coming or out-going faxes for a while, and receive $15.

      Of course those profits will vanish pretty damn fast when a couple of people file TCPA lawsuits in small claims court becuase those faxes are illegal. Not only do you need to show up in court for each suit filed, but each fax results in a minimum $500 fine. Of course each fax is almost guaranteed to actually be a double violation, and the damages are TRIPLE if the fax was not sent by accident (i.e. a genuine innocent wrong-number). So each and every junk fax is generally $3000 in damages if the judge fully enforces the law.

      It doesn't matter HOW profitable junkfaxing is, just a handfull of such cases and you lose your house.

      I suggest you tell your friend to do a quick Google on JunkFax penalties.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll continue this until the money runs out, like anybody else in his position.

      Or until some fine upstanding proponent of all that is just and right waylays him in his own driveway, beats him senseless with a cricket bat, and carves "JUNK FAXER" into his forehead with a flathead screwdriver.

      I'm pretty sure that's legal too under S.1618 Title III, Section 301, provided that the screwdriver is not rusty and not deliberately coated with biological agents, poisons, or chemicals designed to inflict undue pain on the junk faxer. (Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer)

    8. Re:Fax Broadcasting WORKS, people by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      I know somebody who runs a fax list.

      Why do I have this mental image of an adolescent boy buying condoms for "a friend"?

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  38. I just called by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Interesting


    The phone was answered by a non-british accented woman. Probably american accent. She said it was not Flamingo Travel but it is a travel agency.

    Here's the deal. This is probably being done by an aggregator. The spammer is probably giving out a specific 1-800 number that forwards to a 'reputable' travel agency. Whatever is booked off this phone number is then given a commission to the spammer. It might even be a flat commission on the number of calls, completely ignoring the sales made. So, essentially, it could be like a banner click-thru deal and by us calling, the spammer is making mega-bling.

    In any case, if you're going to call this number, be sure to alert the person that you are simply calling to complain about the faxes. This will help the travel people understand that the garbage calls they are receiving are the result of unpleasant and intrusive advertising practices.
    1. Re:I just called by Em+Ellel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would be a heck of a sales ploy, get paid by the call, and post the number on slashdot. :-)

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    2. Re:I just called by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 1

      The message to the end user (spammer customer) is still the same - spammer sends them hefty bill and customer gets an annoying 1-800 number that has to be manned. Customer realizes spam does not work. Spam karma.

      --
      Stay tuned for new sig...
    3. Re:I just called by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing wrong with this. If the companies that are soliciting the spammer's services are paying lots of money only to have people bitch at them about junk faxes, they will probably demand a refund from the spammer. When they don't get it, they'll stop using the spammer. The end result: spamming is less profitable, and therefore not used as often.

    4. Re:I just called by shaitand · · Score: 1

      So what your saying is. It's costing the company THAT HIRED the spammer and makes his line of work feasible double, once for the overseas phone charges and again to pay the spammer this time.

      Basically insuring they get a return well below their investment and never pay for this form of advertising again.

  39. Somethings definitely up with these people by CptChipJew · · Score: 5, Funny

    I called, heard the phone pick up, "Reservations". So I said "I need reservations", and she hung up on me. Then I called back again and they picked up with no response. I said "Hello?", and they hung up.

    So then I called and said "You're gonna die bitch". And then heard a bunch of women laughing.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:Somethings definitely up with these people by msi · · Score: 1

      So then I called and said "You're gonna die bitch". And then heard a bunch of women laughing.

      If you they are in the UK and so are you the police take a very dim view of death threats.

    2. Re:Somethings definitely up with these people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm ... how is this a death threat?

      We're all going to die someday.

  40. Be careful with "revenge attacks" by casual+lemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The poster mentioned the Fax Preference Service in the UK wouldn't help him track down and stop a UK-based faxer. However, he didn't mention whether the FCC would help a non-US fax recipient track down and stop a US-based faxer. Perhaps someone can find and link to the FCC's policies regarding foreign complaints, but in the meantime, be careful with attacking back with auto-dialers, looping faxes, and the like (not that they don't deserve it...just don't set yourself up for more greif).

  41. How about a linux based technology solution? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    I've often read about some of the projects out there to roll your own phone systems. I've never spent the time to implement any of them because they all seem so complex.

    What I want is a linux box that answers my phone and based on caller ID it has rules that tell it what to do with that call. Send it to voicemail, ring the phones, hang up, etc.

    Can this be done yet? Southwestern bell has a $5/month service that will answer unavailable/private calls and ask the person to say their name and then ring you if they do. I would love to do this on my side of the network.

    Is it possible?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:How about a linux based technology solution? by josh3736 · · Score: 1
      Asterisk.

      Seems complicated at first, but is quite Kickass once you figgure it out. (You may need to buy some hardware in order to get it working.)

    2. Re:How about a linux based technology solution? by Scott+Laird · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, works great for me. It re-writes caller-id based on the names in my Mac's address book, recognizes certain callers and uses distinctive ring to tell what's happening, blacklists other numbers. I'm using it to send long-distance calls out via VoIP while still sending local calls via the POTS line that I can't get rid of. Great fun. Details on my blog.

  42. Automated removal - another scam. by tonejava · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I have used their automated system for having my fax number removed, to no avail.

    This just confirms to the sender that your actually paying attention to whats coming through and I'm sure just encourages them to send more.

    You'd think by now you'd be able to get a (walled garden/ firewall) for fax machines!!

  43. You, sir, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are a magnificent bastard. It is bastards of your uncomprimising refinement that serve as brilliant beacons to younger people such as myself. Still points by which we may guide our course so that in time we too may achive greatness.

    In short, you are a credit to the species.

  44. Getting ridiculous by Offshored · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even our spam is getting outsourced. Keep American spammers employed, buy your useless crap only from American spammers.

    1. Re:Getting ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only Americans buy the useless crap from spammers... I've never seen any English spam, it's all bloody American shit in $$$ not GBP's.

  45. toner? Paper? bwahahahh.. 20th centry fool by sPaKr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Jebus they still make paper and ink(toner) fax machines. Wow better get one fast make a killing when the Smithsonian comes calling for the americana display. What kinda ludite do you have to be to have a phone number connected some device that spits out dead trees and sucks toner like gas in a SUV? buy a modem circa 80s, and a similar quailty PC, install free OS dejour and write those faxes directly to the HD, look at them and only print the ones that are worth it. If your uber cool you just turn them into PDF (ps if your still in luddite mode) and email them to your self. If you cant figure out how todo all of this then you DESERVE to kill a billion trees and stain all your cloths with toner.

  46. Just get a faxmodem. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Receive the files okay, ask for more, and save them as JPG on your harddrive. And in case you need a hardcopy, print. In case of spam, just rm.
    It's them who pay for overseas connection anyway.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  47. Even better by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Get a fax that read in line by line, with the output near to the input. Get a piece of black paper that is long enough, feed it trhough, and connect the ends. Continous fax that will run out their toner and might even overheat an older unit.

    1. Re:Even better by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Sounds pretty good, just one flaw though.
      If they have any brains at all they don't have a fax machine, just software to answer like a fax machine with thier modem and store the results. Possibly with settings, etc. to deal with faxes from angry people.
      Still you'd at least tie up a modem for a while and possibly use alot of thier harddrive space. Just depends on how sophisticated a setup they have.
      The other potential problem is the long distance bill you'd rack up doing this.
      Of course if they do have an old fax machine hooked up to a '1-800' number the revenge factor scales quite nicely.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  48. the old 'blax fax' trick might work, but... by haute_sauce · · Score: 1

    ...i would think that any company that has a bank of autodialing fax machines will probably have a machine set up to rec'v faxes, ocr them, and do some form of validity. however, if the intent is to not only tie up the offrnding fax line, but to incur significant charges to the line (assuming the inbound line is an 800 number) , then the above trick of sending a 250 page black doccument is 'a winner' !

  49. british advertising standards by lakin · · Score: 1

    You could try contacting the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority), they may be able to help. While i havent read the british code, I think fax/email sent from britain to the us still falls under the ASA's jurisdiction, and is still illegal if you have not consented. You can find the code here, http://www.asa.org.uk/the_codes/downloads/Bcasp_11 .pdf , but it is probably easier to just phone and ask. Paul

    --
    Paul
  50. my experience by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

    tried twice gt disconnected on the 3rd try I got a recording telling me about a new national directory assistance service and that I should dial 101515800
    warning it costs upwards of $2 to makethe call so I wouldnt dial the number.

  51. The Fast Busy has Arrived. by rackman · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone should have planed trunk capacity for /.. I would hate to be their internal telco guy. I bet his ACD is lit up like a christmas tree. Hope he has enough coffee for the page out.

  52. UK Timeshare companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have a terrible reputation of ripping people off and using aggressive sales pitches.
    Most go bankrupt owing millions and then rise again under new names being run by 'family' members but still controlled by banned directors.
    Stay well clear and don't buy their line that it's a good investment.
    If you're tempted ..just say no and leave your money in a high deposit account.

  53. Not that I've done this myself....... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (looks around nervously)

    If you have their fax number, especially if it's an 800#...

    Take 4 sheets of black construction paper and tape them together end to end so they will feed through your fax machine. Once the first sheet is through, quickly tape it to the last sheet to create a continuous loop.

    If they use conventional fax, use up their paper and toner. If they store faxes electronically, a continuous loop should eat up some storage ;)

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
    1. Re:Not that I've done this myself....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and doodle on the paper so that it doesn't compress perfectly.

  54. I think you're right by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Informative



    I checked on the guy who posted this.. there's really no history of him posting anything on slashdot prior to this--

    iotashan

    Seems like a banner click thru scam, but this time it's with a 1-800 number. Brilliant.

    1. Re:I think you're right by iotashan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No... I'm real, and I'm not on there. The whole purpose of doing this was so they would be flooded with calls about how faxes suck. Please mention that when you call. Don't buy anything!

    2. Re:I think you're right by Technician · · Score: 1

      Seems like a banner click thru scam, but this time it's with a 1-800 number. Brilliant.


      Yeah, brilliant. After all the angry calls come in, what do you want to bet the FAX broadcaster gets no repeat business from the travel timeshare company? It's important to make sure this type of advertising does not pay off. It's unimportant the FAXer is getting a fee for each call. What is important is the business that hired him may haul him into court for fraud or otherwise won't pay because of the injury caused. They certanly are not going to be a repeat customer.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  55. /. the phone line! by genzil · · Score: 1

    I'm a Brit doing my thing and helping a fellow /.er by ringing the number, only thing is that I can't get through!

  56. Got it! by SecState · · Score: 1

    Looks like we've managed to /. the phone line! They're hanging up as fast as soon as they pick up... could hear other phones ringing in the background. Haven't had this much fun on the phone since fifth grade!

  57. Looks like it's /.ed by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

    I just called the number -- the other end picked up for a moment and hung right up again! How rude!

    For the half a moment that I could hear, there were lots of phones ringing and someone was shouting. Business must be good!

    1. Re:Looks like it's /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting real fuzzy feeling reading this. Good Job /.'ers :)

  58. a note by ecalkin · · Score: 1

    It will indeed eat paper and toner. if it's stored in digital an all black xmit would probaby compress nicely. what you may want is something with a random pattern to big to compress.

    eric

    1. Re:a note by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You miss the point.

      The digital data on the all-black fax will compress well, but their toner bill will NOT compress well.

      Although I expect they'll be using computer-based digital fax delivery, which is the only way I'd tolerate faxes anyhow. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  59. get rid of your fax machine by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    And replace it with a computer. Their faxes will still tie up your line for the same amount of time, but now you can just delete them and move on with your life instead of having them print out and waste your paper and toner or ink or whatever your fax machine uses. It will reduce them from a minor annoyance to a trivial one.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  60. Has anyone clued them in? by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

    has anyone told them to come to slahdot and look at this article?

  61. Ah hah hah hah by Hamstaus · · Score: 1

    I must say, this is more entertainment than you get at most movies! Someone answers each time I phone, but hangs up immediately. On the occasions that they are a bit slower, I can hear some background noise, and it sounds like a symphony of phones ringing there.

    If nothing else, some of the employees will probably quit. Ah hah hah hah!

    --
    I moderate "-1, Fool"
  62. They're just hanging up now..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but the call still connects, of course. :)

  63. Normal people, that's who. by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Who the hell uses a fax machine anymore anyways???

    Normal businesses and people, that's who.

    When an editor wants to send back a marked-up piece of copy, they do it by fax. Any real editor in the world will tell you that you don't edit online. You do it with proofreaders' marks, circles, arrows, writing in between lines, etc.

    If you are, or are dealing with, a lawyer, a real-estate agent, or anyone who works with contracts, you exchange the contracts via fax. (Typing your name in e-mail doesn't count as a signature.)

    The business world still relies on faxes because they work better than e-mail for many purposes.

    Most people don't have sheetfeed scanners, so they can't put a 15 page document in their scanner and just walk away. They have to feed it page by page, so don't even bother with the use-a-scanner-and-e-mail-it line.

    1. Re:Normal people, that's who. by cliveholloway · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you are, or are dealing with, a lawyer, a real-estate agent, or anyone who works with contracts, you exchange the contracts via fax. (Typing your name in e-mail doesn't count as a signature.)

      And just how crazy is that? I kept a scan of my signature on my PC when I ran a web design business. If anything needed changing at the bank, I'd write a letter to the bank and plop the TIF sig in and fax. And my employees could do it too if I was away. Could I email them a GPG/PGP signed email? Nope. Can I do that now? Nope? Can I *still* send them a fax with a pasted in scanned signature? Yep.

      I'll never understand the mentality of UK banks (Lloyds in this particular case) or anyone who accepts "signed" faxes as a secure document...

      .02

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    2. Re:Normal people, that's who. by cft_128 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you are, or are dealing with, a lawyer, a real-estate agent, or anyone who works with contracts, you exchange the contracts via fax. (Typing your name in e-mail doesn't count as a signature.)

      Funny, when I worked with my real estate agent it was as you said with changes faxed back and forth until the final document was barely ledgible, but in the corporate world I've seen with a couple of contract negotiations take places via email and MS Word with track changes turned on.

      The final versions were of course read very carefully by both sides and then signed versions were faxed back and forth.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    3. Re:Normal people, that's who. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well if you don't trust the person, don't make any contract with them so the signature shit whether crypto or not is not worth anything. If GPG/PGP becomes really common and signatures become binding then there'll be worms snarfing passphrases and signing stuff. So it's really silly to rely on stuff like this as foolproof (despite what BS the Corps/Orgs spout).

      Credit cards have crappy security, but still the card companies and issuers do better than OK. There are plenty of services that rely on trust and they do ok. Many eating places here trust you to tell them what you eat so they can charge you. They do fine.

      All that paperwork is to help the lawyers do their stuff in event of a disagreement.

      If you don't trust the person and still need to make a contract then you need a mutually trusted 3rd party/parties as witness. That way everyone sees everyone signing, even if it's a stupid X mark or an throwaway GPG key, when it comes to court, if you say "Nyah, it's not my sig" you'd get the book thrown at you.

      --
    4. Re:Normal people, that's who. by Grackle · · Score: 1

      When an editor wants to send back a marked-up piece of copy, they do it by fax. Any real editor in the world will tell you that you don't edit online. You do it with proofreaders' marks, circles, arrows, writing in between lines, etc.

      Try telling that to the "real" editors at Oxford University Press, USA TODAY, Springer, the Washington Post, Newsday, the Associated Press, etc., etc.

      Proofreader's marks still have their purpose, but to say that they are de rigueur for pro editing just ain't right -- newspapers and book publishers have been using online text editing systems for well over a decade.

    5. Re:Normal people, that's who. by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Try telling that to the "real" editors at Oxford University Press, USA TODAY, Springer, the Washington Post, Newsday, the Associated Press, etc., etc.

      I would be happy to. Send them my way.

      Proofreader's marks still have their purpose, but to say that they are de rigueur for pro editing just ain't right -- newspapers and book publishers have been using online text editing systems for well over a decade.

      My significant other is a professional editor and writer. She worked for Time-Life Books as an employee for 15 years -- first as a researcher, then as a writer, and finally as an editor. She was with them until the merger with AOL when they began shutting down the book division. Edits were always done with pen and paper.

      Since leaving there, she has worked for many clients and is currently working on a project for a top-tier book publisher. Editing is still done via faxes and handwritten proofreading marks.

      Perhaps you are mistaking content editors with copy editors.

  64. They jus tfreaking called me back. by rackman · · Score: 1

    As I was dialing some guy was on the other end. It looked like I had picked up right as they were calling in. Hope he likes a busy.

  65. 800 numbers don't work, online FAX does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    800 numbers are now reachable from overseas (at normal long distance rates), so they are not a defense against FAX spam anymore.

    What does help, however, is to use on-line FAX accounts. That way, your FAXes get delivered as email and you don't have to waste toner or paper on discarding them. In fact, you can filter on the telephone number, which will appear in the Subject: line with many on-line FAX services.

  66. Get Real on the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I searched Yahoo and found the following site matching the phone number. www.flamingo-travel.com/Home/News.asp?ID=1

    OK, Now attack.

  67. gee, if only there were some way your computer ... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    Is my only weapon having a bunch of friends call this 800 number to make the company's overseas toll-free phone bill unbearable?

    You got a modem? You got a phone line? I would set up mine so that whenever I was asleep or out of the house it would just keep dialing them. Maybe they can see the number and decide not to answer, but it would still help tie up their incoming lines.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  68. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all circuits currently busy due to priority testing ongoing on the line :) I have scheduled some very disruptive circuit tests for the next 24-48 hours on that number, continual runs due to the nature of the performance issues :) Usage both incoming and outgoing will be very spotty for the duration.
    AT&T serving our customers in the best way we know how...POORLY :)

  69. iotashan was or ... by twitter · · Score: 1
    He was a liar. I assume Cliff followed up with a phone call before obliterating this fax pest who knowingly violated another country's laws and preferences to try to earn a quick buck. The 800 number is already toast. Good riddance.

    iotashan asked, "why are you bothering me, I don't want to buy your shit?"

    spammer answered, "because we can."

    iotashan asked, "what can I do to these worms?"

    My phone call to them was what he did.

    Nice work, io. The place I used to work got four or five of these stupid things a day. Finincial ruin onto spammers.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  70. codename SDDA by jreberry · · Score: 1

    SlashDot Digital Army ATTACK!! love it!

  71. Spammers Always Lie - Trace the call by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative
    Phone calls from the UK to the US have gotten very cheap these days - the typical telephone card you buy from a convenience store was under 5 cents per minute for US to UK five years ago, so I assume that high-volume business minutes are close to 2-3 cents, not much different from calling within the US. So it could be cheap.

    However, spammers always lie - if they're using an 800 number, there's a high probability that it really _is_ in the US, and they're just claiming to be in England to make you go away. Or the 800 number could be going to a VOIP box in the US which connects them to a call center in the UK. So trace the call - at least with callerid, if nothing else (though that's often inaccurate) and see if you can find out where it's from. If the call is coming in on a direct analog phone line, you can also use one of the phone company features like *69 or your local telco's call tracing versions to check further.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Spammers Always Lie - Trace the call by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      My long distance provider charges 3.2 cents per minute to the UK. That's lower than Canada, Hawaii or Alaska.

    2. Re:Spammers Always Lie - Trace the call by notyou2 · · Score: 1

      Counter-intuitively, calling from the US to the UK is considerably cheaper than calling from the UK to the US. So much so, that many companies offer call-back services as a calling card system: you dial a US number, let it ring twice then hang up. The system then dials you BACK from the US, and when you answer, you're then into the system. That is, you hit an access code or pin or whatever, then the phone number you wanna dial, as if you had dialed them.

      That said, I'm not up on the latest rates.

    3. Re:Spammers Always Lie - Trace the call by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Counter-intuitively, calling from the US to the UK is considerably cheaper than calling from the UK to the US.

      That is true of many countries, and 3 or 4 years ago it was true of the UK. But the UK toll call market is extremely competitive now, and none of the low cost operators are using callback anymore.

    4. Re:Spammers Always Lie - Trace the call by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1

      I can call from the UK to the US for 0.01 (GBP) which is less than 2 cents and it does not involve callback. Check out call18866 if you know somebody paying more!

  72. Flamingo's Website - "It's not us" by iReflect · · Score: 1

    More information is at Flamingo Travel's website.

    1. Re:Flamingo's Website - "It's not us" by iReflect · · Score: 1

      nevermind... :)

  73. Oh no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brilliant is when they get the list of numbers from their phone bill and sell that list to telemarketers. That's f'ing brilliant. Hopefully the lines of most people calling don't accept incoming calls.

  74. Try this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try http://www.junkfaxes.org/

    also, google the number. Other people have had a similar problem with the same company.

  75. Automated Calling by Coleco · · Score: 1

    If you have better things to do then to be calling a 1 800 number over and over then crack out your old modem and get it to dial the number over and over and over and over. Also whoever answers the phone will greeted with a carrier tone :)

  76. My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a year by B747SP · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I have a minor problem with junk fax and cold calling (call it voice-spam if you will) here in Sydney, Australia.

    One of the most persistent offenders is a two-bit little box-pushing laser printer and supplies company in the north of Sydney called 'IT Imaging' (sales@itimaging.com.au). Their business practises are pretty suspect at the best of times, for eg I called them for a quote on a printer once (that I didn't go through with - too expensive) and they started calling my contemporaries in other departments saying "We're doing business with him, maybe you want to buy from us too?". They're big on junk faxes too.

    When I get cold calls or junk faxes, I just add them to my "don't buy from these arseholes" list, and they stay there for a year. A polite email/fax to the effect of "As a direct and specific consequence of your decision to send me junk [mail|spam|call], I have added your company to my department's do-not-buy list, and your company will not be considered for any [insert product here] requirements for one year from this date]".

    The Apple Centre in Taylor Square are another junk faxer of note here in Sydney, and they're pretty much a permanent resident on the "do not buy" list too!

    Got a call from a girlie trying to be all official sounding, "calling on behalf of sales executive Mister Sales Droid from Fuji Xerox, wondering if you want to buy printers, blah blah". "We like Fuji Xerox as a company, here, because FX sustainable business practices are something we like, BUT, as a direct and specific result of your call...". They get off the phone real quick when you tell them that. I guess they want their year to start as soon as possible, so it will be over ASAP! :-)

    Admittedly, this doesn't help with the anon and hard to contact fax spammers, but it seems to work pretty well on the ones who actually want to do quasi-legitimate business with you.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  77. Use a fax-modem.... by billstewart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    OK, it's obvious how to implement this with paper faxes, but you _should_ be able to do more interesting things with fax-modems....

    And they're almost certainly receiving the fax on a fax modem, so sending lots of black bits just uses up jpeg space, not human attention. You really want to send them lots of faxes that _look_ like they're real requests, so humans need to waste time reading them.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Use a fax-modem.... by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

      Setup a mail merge to fill out a real form with random data? then send it to you fax-print device?

      --
      Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    2. Re:Use a fax-modem.... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      We should fax them our junkmail ;]

    3. Re:Use a fax-modem.... by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, it's obvious how to implement this with paper faxes, but you _should_ be able to do more interesting things with fax-modems....

      But isn't the paper-loop trick just as annoying on a fax-modem? Sure it's not wasting paper/toner on the other end (which is good for everyone really) yet it is hogging their resources. At least one modem from their pool will be out of 'normal' service all weekend while the loop runs. And that's if only one attacker is at work. Who cares if they readily recognize tons of obviously fake faxes when they come in on monday, the point is they couldn't get *any* real ones during the attack.

    4. Re:Use a fax-modem.... by billstewart · · Score: 1
      It's still a bit annoying, because they've got to discard a bunch of 1-bits, but it's not the same as running their fax machine empty of toner overnight, leaving a stack of black paper, and running them out of toner. With typical paper fax machines, you can run them out of paper in ~100-200 pages, and at speeds of 10 pages/minute, that'll take you 10-20 minutes, rather than tying up the phone all weekend.

      After all, unlike spam, where the big cost is wasting the time of the recipients, fax spam has direct costs to the recipient, such as paper and toner, as well as risking running the recipient's fax out of paper or toner overnight, preventing them from receiving real faxes. That was especially annoying back when most faxes used thermal paper (expensive) or other special paper, and it's annoying now if your fax machine uses inkjet printing (expensive ink.) And that's why junk fax laws got passed long before email spam laws - you can credit Spamford with both of them :-)

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  78. A way to slove the problem by Kilz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok finaly a subject I know something about. My background is that I repair fax and copiers for a major Chicago copier dealer. I am curently trained on over 25 models of fax and 20 multi function or fax/copier/printer all in ones.
    First off most faxes have whats called a junk or spam fax number blocking list. You will have to read how to access it for your fax , but they all have it. Simply add the number to the list and no more faxes will come your way from them.
    Second if you want to pay this person back I have a way designed to hurt someone bad. Simply make 5 copies with the lid up on a copier, this will give you 5 black sheets. Next tape them end to end . Put tape on the end of the long black strip. Insert it in your fax and dial the number. As the lead edge comes through the scaner tape the lead edge with the tape on the end creating a loop. Leave this send for 5 or 60 mins.
    On the other end black sheets will pour out and will not stop. If done on a thermal machine the print head is toast. Best to do it in the middle of the night as no one will be there to unplug the fax.

    --
    I trust Microsoft as far as I could comfortably spit a dead rat
  79. Isnt there by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 1

    isnt there a place where we can sign their number up for porn...like we can subscribe porn thru emails

  80. Anyone getting through? by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

    They've stopped answering the phone for me
    ae they stil picking up yours? maybe they gave up and decided just to let the phones ring

  81. Damn... by anamexis · · Score: 2, Funny
    I tried replying to a spam in my email with a email that just contained a
    <body bgcolor='black'>
    tag, but they just sent me more spam.
  82. Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now why does their phone line stay in the High-Z state? As in open circuit. . .

  83. That would be rude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasting the time of job-seekers like that would be rude. Post a Usenet announcement about Free Phone Sex instead...

  84. Not a reasonable solution by Scott+Richter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Woops, sorry, this solution requires more effort than plugging the machine into the wall. How could I have even brought it up.

    When you work for a company someday, you'll find that no one wants to pay someone to hack a damned fax machine solution. Believe it or not, most people have jobs that don't allow them such free time. Wanting to "just plug it in" is a quite reasonable expectation. Just because everyone around here has the time, skill, and disposition to fuck around with their hardware doesn't everybody does

    Not to mention that a standard fax machine is simpler and more stable than a computer-based solution for those companies that aren't large enough to really devote time to doing it right.

    Also, there are a lot of reasons why someone's info might not show up on Caller ID - such as being behind a PBX in some instances - and that would basically be giving up on business.

    All in all, that was a very good suggestion for those who don't actually have to run a real business.

    1. Re:Not a reasonable solution by HBI · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Umm, dude, i've been in business probably longer than you have. People like you are the people I make irrelevant and replace. They fail to implement solutions. Your willingness to accept anachronisms is the problem, not my desire to fix problems. You can argue the details all day long - there is a solution to every problem.

      Better watch out behind you, someone is ready to do what you are afraid to do.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:Not a reasonable solution by Scott+Richter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Umm, dude, i've been in business probably longer than you have. People like you are the people I make irrelevant and replace. They fail to implement solutions. Your willingness to accept anachronisms is the problem, not my desire to fix problems. You can argue the details all day long - there is a solution to every problem.

      Unless you're willing to work for free, not everyone has the willingness or ability to pay you. As for your "solution," caller ID can be spoofed, and you ignore the problem where businesses don't have the luxury to lose business to the multitude of people behind PBX's. I have to deal constantly with smartasses who thought they could fix things but screw them up even worse. People would rather deal with a few junk faxes than lose business because a customer's order got rejected.

      Make sure your "solution" doesn't cause more problems than it fixes. In this case, the best solution is a garbage can near the fax.

    3. Re:Not a reasonable solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha.

      i bet you feel better now. nothing like stroking your own ego.

      but it's pretty thin. and no one here on /. is buying your bullshit.

      now i've added you to my friend list, and i'm gonna mod your ass down for the rest of your sorry ass life.

    4. Re:Not a reasonable solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for your "solution," caller ID can be spoofed

      It's nice that you read that somewhere, but you have no fucking clue how to actually do it, and neither do any of the junk faxers/telemarketers.

      An inbound call blocker based on caller ID is a brilliant idea and would sell very well, especially if it had an RS-232 interface on it.

  85. Prince Albert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they are in England I'm gonna repeat call and continually ask if they have Prince Albert in a can...

  86. The website says timeshare by phatsharpie · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the website provided by Slashdot:

    They are coming from a company in Florida calling themselves Flamingo Travel... they sell time shares.

    -B

    1. Re:The website says timeshare by sribe · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are coming from a company in Florida calling themselves Flamingo Travel... they sell time shares.

      AHA! Then the original poster can grab them by the balls and squeeze until they pass out!!!

      Under federal law a U.S. based company who contracts to have spam faxes sent to U.S. phone numbers is subject to the $500/$1500 per fax fine regardless of what country the faxes are sent from. In other words: although you can't touch the U.K. company that's actually sending the faxes, you can sue the company on whose behalf they are being sent--and even win no less ;-)

  87. What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one has an archive of all the worst shock-site pictures loaded into a word document all ready to blast out on whomever is foolish enough to dare? Then beauty of that is, you can configue word not to show the pictures, but they'll sure as hell show up on the other end heh.

    Let's see how smug they are when they're drowning in their own vomit. It's about time the goatse.cx guy used his powers for good.

  88. little scrip to extra slashdot their site by joeldg · · Score: 1

    cd /tmp/
    mkdir junk
    --- now script --
    rm -rf /tmp/junk/*
    wget -r http://www.flamingo-travel.com
    --- done ---

    loop it up :)
    that should help... hope they are paying for bandwidth too.. :)

    1. Re:little scrip to extra slashdot their site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... that's also a federal crime now (clearly a DDOS attack). Homeland Security takes this stuff pretty seriously these days...

    2. Re:little scrip to extra slashdot their site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey there,

      We are NOT the Flamingo that faxes you, we have nothing to do with them. Please take a look at the site and in our news it explains that clearly. So please, whatever revenge you are trying to pull here...is to an innocent party. Don't believe me? Follow up on the references on our site and ask the people we have complained to to stop the Florida based spam people.
      Call me on the phone or email me....I will give you copies of everything.

      Before you get nasty with people, why don't you make sure they deserve it?

      Maureen
      maureencarreno@flamingo-travel.com
      610 -532-1000
      www.flamingo-travel.com

  89. Just called. by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    First three times, someone picked up the phone, then hung it back up again. I could hear phones almost ringing themselves off the hook in the background. Next ten times, it just rang, and rang, and rang.....

    I really should be getting back to studying for my finals, but a few more calls shouldn't hurt anyone ;-)

  90. One truly insightful post so far... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    The only post I saw that was informative, was to put a FAX card in your linux box, and script it to only accept calls from ANI that is on a whitelist.

    Which leads me to believe that if you were to build a small box like this, with a keypad to add "whitelisted" numbers, or perhaps even an ethernet interface and a web server, like linksys does, to configure it - it would sell pretty well.

    I wonder if high end FAX machines can offer this? Let me see....


    Well, i can't find a FAX machine that allows a ANI white list. I did find this article on a class-action lawsuit against fax.com though...
    http://siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php /1451781

  91. Just talk dirty to them. They love it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really when any solicitor calls me, even my bank, just start with the dirtiest phone sex talk you can imagine (or if you are not brazen download some).

    I remember i wrote a fax app in dos (pascal api) that did just that. it wardialed the leasing office fax machine and sent black pages all night. This was a while ago. They unplug the fax at night now lol.

    Anyone got a program that wardials in xp these days? Its been a long time ;) I can't get providian to stop calling me from india. The folks just keep calling 830am noon 430pm, im like dude (person being called) is at work.

    im ready to wardial and if i can use TAPI say something that i mean.

  92. Good job. by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    You sir, deserve a Gold Star.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  93. ooooo by Konster · · Score: 1

    Simple....call them from a pay phone, 800 numbers don't require money for the pay phone since the company you are calling picks up that tab.

    Also, they won't get your home phone number this way!

    1. Re:ooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your right, you are essentially giving them your # if you don't realize ani, by calling the 800 #, thus this is the same as clicking on a remove me link (yah right) on a spam email.

      calling direct is the last thing you want to do. You just opted yourself in to someones list whether you liked it or not

  94. How to fake an order by dtfinch · · Score: 5, Informative

    For academic purposes only. Know the laws of your state.

    First, you'll need a credit card number.
    Visa numbers are constructed like this like this:
    Start with the digit 4
    16 digits altogether
    The checksum they must pass is:
    Take the even digits, double them, and add the resulting digits together to get a new digit. (or just map 0-9 to 0246813579 for the even digits).
    Then add all the digits together. If it's a multiple of 10, the card number is valid. A quick way to generate would be to start with 4 plus 14 random digits, calculate the checksum of those 15 digits, and subtract from 10 to get the remaining digit.

    Their machines will initially accept them, and be forced to contact visa to verify their correctness, at which time they'd fail, but result in small charges to their merchanct account. Enough bad card numbers can get an account suspended.

    1. Re:How to fake an order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For the lame and bored, you could do a search for ccmaster.exe from the old days, I'm sure it's still out there. :) 1,000 cards from 1 card.. but umm, I didn't tell you that

    2. Re:How to fake an order by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that providing a fake CC number is probably a crime -- maybe even a felony.

      They could argue that you tried to fraudulently obtain a product using a credit card number you knew to be invalid or which you had no authority to use.

      Got to be careful, a pissed-off spammer can be an wicked beast and may just decide to make an example of someone. At least cover your tracks by calling from a public phone.

    3. Re:How to fake an order by lewko · · Score: 1

      I followed your instructions to the letter and constructed the following valid VISA number:

      4111 1111 1111 1111

      I don't know how, but even though the checksum computes, everyone I have given it to so far recognised it as a fake! Maybe the expiry date was the giveaway?

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    4. Re:How to fake an order by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Or call them and start making an order. But not just any order, make one that would be their biggest of the month (but stay realistic), so the person answering would know this is a very important call.
      About half way through, in the middle of a sentence, hang up.
      Call back and repeat, be sure to go through all the (numerous) details again and be sure to have the same guy again. Start as understanding, become more annoyed, and then just plain angry tell them you'll call some one else.
      Especially when they are paid a percentage of each sale they make, this is going to give them one very bad day.

    5. Re:How to fake an order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The code below is like a handgun. You can use it for good, or you can use it for evil.

      #!/usr/bin/python
      from random import randint
      card_number = "4"
      for count in range(14):
      digit = str(randint(0,9))
      card_number = card_number + digit
      for count in range(10):
      card_number = card_number[0:15] + str(count)
      sum = 0
      no_digit = len(card_number)
      oddeven = no_digit & 1
      for count in range(0, no_digit):
      digit = int(card_number[count])
      if not (( count & 1 ) ^ oddeven ):
      digit = digit * 2
      if digit > 9:
      digit = digit - 9
      sum = sum + digit
      if (sum % 10) != 0:
      continue
      else:
      break
      print card_number

  95. Slashdot on their website by powerbarr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Evidently this Flamingo Travel has been getting complaints about the one sending spams and it is affecting their business as well. A message is at the top of their website saying it is a different Flamingo Travel.

  96. software fax program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While not a fix for your problem it will cut down your toner costs. We use it at work and get junk faxes occationally. We just delete them like email spam and then print out the real faxes.

  97. on the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    who's to say that this # or any/all of the others mentioned in the comments are spammers? What a great way to piss off a legit faxer: tell /. they're spammers and watch them get taken out of business...

    1. Re:on the other hand... by iotashan · · Score: 1

      No, they really are spammers. Original fax: http://www.iotashan.com/spamfax.gif

  98. Minor correction by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Mains is 230V.

  99. Automate the 800 number dialing... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd write a little shell script that just dials out of a modem and calls their 800 number every 10 seconds. Then pass out the collection of older modems that so many of us have to your friends along with the script and have at it... Of course, they might find some legal loophole and be able to sue you for harassment, etc., but you won't know til you try. :)

  100. Faxes on Voicemail by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

    A bit un-related but the most annoying fax SPAM of all: getting Fax SPAMS on voicemail.

    A friend had been getting faxes through voicemail for office supplies. I transferred what part of the fax that was on voicemail to a real fax machine. A complaint to the telephone company (Bell Canada) later and no more! The telephone companies usually take action pretty fast.

  101. toner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're worried about paper and toner, grab some fax
    software and use one of the PCs in your office that has a
    fax/modem in it to recieve faxes and preview them in
    software and print out the ones you want on paper. snap in
    the fax machine for sending.

  102. methinks I detect a flaw... by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 1

    wouldn't most spammers also have computers so the endless-loop-of-black-paper-trick wouldn't amount to anything but spam (annoying, but not costly)?

    --
    When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:methinks I detect a flaw... by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      it'll fill up there hard drive space.

  103. You had better not. by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Right name, wrong domain. There's more than one "Flamingo Travel" out there. They're one of the victims mentioned in the original post that has been hurt by these spammers.

    1. Re:You had better not. by joeldg · · Score: 2, Funny

      hrm.. I currently have a cluster on an unmetered t3 hammering the shit out of them..
      anyone got the real addy?

  104. Update on Flamingo's Website by Alex711 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Click on the website of the site and you will get the following message (It's probably a good idea to calm down now): We have been recieving phone calls from people angry that we are sending them fax specials like $99 to Disney and Kids Free. Please know that they are NOT coming from Flamingo Travel Group in Pennsylvania. They are coming from a company in Florida calling themselves Flamingo Travel. Their phone number is 1-800-328-9795 and they sell time shares. FILE YOUR COMPLAINT: http://ftp.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/unwantedfaxes .html ***We do not send faxed specials...ever...period.*** ***We do not send email blasts...we only send email to people that ask for it*** ***We remove people right away if they change thier mind at any time.*** ***We value our privacy and we would never violate yours by sharing privledged contact information. *** ***We have nothing to do with time shares. Personally, I think they are a bad idea*** A reputable Travel Company will provide you with: 1. A Physical Address of thier place of business. 2. Their phone, fax and email information. 3. Their IATA number. 4. They will never ask for your income information...it's none of thier business. 5. Any reputable company should allow you time to check them out, offer information to help you check them out and this information should be verifiable.

    1. Re:Update on Flamingo's Website by calebb · · Score: 1

      Ok, here's the flaw in that logic:

      If some company is sending junk faxes for travel deals, and they list an 800 number that isn't their own, how are they going to make money?

      Let me make it even clearer: If a spammer starts sending emails with nothing but a good deal at dell.com (for example), how will that make them any money unless it's Dell that is directly (or indirectly) sending the email?

      Assuming the author of the ask slashdot question wasn't lying, the junk faxes tell you to call 1-800-328-9795 to buy their timeshares.

      The only other possibility is people have been looking at this website and calling other numbers that are listed on it, and not the actual number off the junk fax (1-800-328-9795) - but it sounds like they are complaining about people calling 1-800-328-9795 to me... in which case they need to track down the junk faxer and tell them to stop advertising their company for them! (???)

    2. Re:Update on Flamingo's Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not anymore on their website, and the .gov link is not working..

      who's moderating this?

    3. Re:Update on Flamingo's Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remove the space from the link, you stupid shithead.

    4. Re:Update on Flamingo's Website by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      You know, based on the way that the Flamingo Travel Group in Pennsylvania handled this, I hope they get a lot of business, or at least exposure from this issue.

      They obviously have a very clear stance on privacy and on the practices of the company who is really at fault.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  105. Innocent! by Penguinshit · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Apparently these guys are having a tough time because of this.. insta-Slashdot side-effect!

  106. now your on the international phone spam list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    800 numbers use ANI so your caller ID blocking doesn't work. This might be a scam set up by the original poster to get people of a certain demographic (slash is mostly read by US-based technology early adopter consumers with money to spend on crap like ipods) so they can sell your numbers to others for marketing purposes. Since you made the first call you have implicitly created a relationship with them. Now, a US based company can buy this list and doesn't have to comply with the do not call policy.

    I'm not paranoid if they're all out to get me.

  107. Call from a payphone! by stox · · Score: 3, Informative

    It costs the recipient $0.25+ for each call from a payphone. Hit'em where it hurts.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Call from a payphone! by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      It costs the recipient $0.25+ for each call from a payphone. Hit'em where it hurts.

      Mod parent up. I believe that it costs them about $0.50 every time you call. One could rack up a very significant phone bill very quickly.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  108. The digital response by Annirak · · Score: 1

    Why not make all incoming faxes go to a server with a fax modem in it, and filter it like you would normal spam?

    Alternatively, call your telephone company and demand that they block the spammer's number?

  109. Junkbusters have lots of advice on this topic by MCRocker · · Score: 2, Informative

    JunkBUSTERS has a good web page on dealing with junk faxes. They also have lots of good, practical advice on lots of other related communications abuses. This is a site that is well worth checking out.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  110. Now for the solution: by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    Track them down and kill them.

    And no, I'm not joking. They deserve death.

  111. Just in case we've been duped... by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Well, of _course_ I called them from my modem line, not that I bother connecting it to a modem these days :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  112. worthless calls = no more customers for aggregator by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    So, essentially, it could be like a banner click-thru deal and by us calling, the spammer is making mega-bling.

    Not really. Why? Because like any product or service, if what you deliver (in this case, callers) is worthless (in this case, geeks looking to ask if their fridge is running), customers walk.

    When all the customers have walked, you go out of business.

  113. Nope, that seems unlikely by k98sven · · Score: 1

    That hardly explains why the other companies with that name are apparently desparately saying "it's not us!!" and have filed FCC complaints, etc.

  114. Mod him up! by jcr · · Score: 1

    When Bill Stewart has something to say about phone companies, mark it "+5, definitive".

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  115. Is he aware of the TCPA? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    Has he ever been sued?

    Have you told him that what he does is illegal?

    1. Re:Is he aware of the TCPA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the TCPA has nothing to do with it.
      a much older FCC ruling does.

  116. SCAM! 800 numbers not necessarily free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I can't believe all you suckers! The fact is that not all 800 numbers are free. I expect in a month we'll have another /. story from people complaining that they were charged for those 3 hour long fax sessions.

  117. Googling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After Googling the 800-328-9795 number it appears that the poster isn't the only people ticked off at the offenders.

  118. Small Claims Court ... by Art+Pollard · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can still take them to small claims court. Keep in mind, you can recover $500 plus collection expenses. Thus it is $500 plus the cost of having the suit served in England and your court fees.

    After you get a judgement (which you will do since they will most likely not show up), you can put a lien on any propety or bank accounts or other aspects of their business in the United States. You may even be able to approach Visa / Mastercard and attach a lien against their accounts. Furthermore, once you have a judgement, you should be able to pursue them across national lines due to the many treaties that are in place.

    I sure would like to see their expression once they realize that yes, you can pursue them across national bounderies. -Art

  119. Copy of Original Spam?? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Without a copy of the original spam fax, it's hard to know exactly what to say to these spammers to get their attention. Do they want you to call them or fax them? What are they advertising? Did the fax have an ostensible originating fax number? (Faxing black pages to their voice line isn't all that useful :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Copy of Original Spam?? by iotashan · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the risk of bringing my poor server to it's knees, or getting a huge bandwidth bill, here's a copy of the lastest spam fax: http://www.iotashan.com/spamfax.gif

    2. Re:Copy of Original Spam?? by EboMike · · Score: 3, Informative

      To save your server from that fate, I'll pseudo-transcribe the fax:

      ###

      Disney Vacation (KIDS ARE FREE!)

      4 Days
      3 Nights
      in Orlando
      $99 per person
      double occupancy

      This Special Rate is Limited to the first 50 Purchasers Today!

      {[Ask about our all inclusive 3 day 2 Night Cruise to the Bahamas!]}

      INCLUDES: 2 Disney Tickets FREE!

      Buy (Disney Vacation Package) get (Cruise Vacation Package) FREE!

      BONUS: Daytona Beach 3 Days 2 Nights

      Purchase Today and Receive Complimentary Air Voucher to Jamaica, Mexico or Las Vegas PLUS 2 Nights Accommodations!

      1-800-328-9795

      CALL NOW
      LIMITED AVAILABILITY

      Processing and accomodation fee not included. To have your fax number removed please call 1-888-211-8303 . Time share tour optional.

      ###

      That was harder than it looks. The layout of that page is horrible.

  120. Revenge by TastyWords · · Score: 1

    Sure, it costs you, but if you are able to reverse the communications, *ignore* the morons who will inevitably tell you to tape three or four pieces of paper together into a loop.

    What to do?

    I'm glad you asked. Fax them black construction paper. (if you want to really get them, then loop several pages of black paper and send it). I doubt there's a fax machine on the market which contains enough toner for more than a couple of sheets. And once you've wasted their toner (it shouldn't take very long), any faxed information [to them] will be skipped.

    1. Re:Revenge by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      That'd use up a lot of toner, to be sure, but faxing a pure black document doesn't really do all that much in terms of phone charges. The fax protocol uses run-length encoding, so if it sees a 7" line of all black, it just tells the remote machine that it has 1400 black dots. It'd be better to send a random pattern that RLE can't compress.

  121. HOW I FOUGHT IT AND WON!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're right, slashdot is definitely the arena to put something like this if you want mass calls. If you don't have access to this though you may be able to fight it a different way. Here's an example...

    I got those same FaxSpam messages and tried getting unsubscribed many many times. I left messages, I left my contact information and in turn got fed up and applied a technical response to the problem.

    The number listed on my FaxSpam was a 3+ minute recording of some guy yacking about the fool proof money making method of the month. I'm sure it cost him $.25 per call considering the legth of the message.

    I had a bank of innactive modems for a newly de-installed dial-in system for my company. I fired it back up and attached it to a management computer. I then proceeded to plug all 48 modems back into our PBX lines (no numbers listed to be blocked) and wrote a cute script to war-dial on all 48 modems the 800 number listed. I ran the script for about an hour to test its stability and then shut it off.

    I figured I'd give the spammer one more shot to remove my company's information and called the number in person. I left a polite message saying who I was and that I was once again requesting to be removed from his fax list. I left my number and a temporary e-mail address saying, that I was aware of how much each call was costing him and that I would repeatedly call to take up his time and money. I waited 24 hours and gave him every chance to remove me. That next night we received the same barage of fax spams to all of the fax machines at my company. I turned my script back on and let the program run away. It ran for about 36 hours before I received a call back from the guy that ran the FaxSpam list. He had left the message whie I was out of my office but it boiled down to him begging me to stop calling. By the time I got the message(2 hours later), the 800 number had been disconnected. We noticed a significant drop-off in FaxSpam before I left the company.

    1. Re:HOW I FOUGHT IT AND WON!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you 'left' the company? Riiiiight...

  122. Stopping junk faxes by TomBeckman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to get serveral junk faxes every day. I called the phone company to modify the fax line configuration only to accept calls that presented caller ID information. This stopped all of the junk faxes.

  123. slashdotted via phone by mooosenix · · Score: 0

    I just called... I let it ring, and got a system message. Nobody picked up :)

  124. Not quite.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's the real Flamingo Travel, identified as the victim in the first paragraph. Notice the dates, late march to late april.

    The fake Flamingo Travel isn't done till everyone who works there is chilling at the morgue, and I can watch their children take it from a donkey in a Mexican bar for 100 pesos.

    To combat the spammers I say we use the Necronomicon to raise some Deadites and get medieval on their punk asses.

  125. OS Project??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmm... waiting for someone annoyed enough with
    this crap to someday come up with a program
    that you could put on agetty, modem picks up...

    An tarpits the fax... yea send me a fax it'll
    only take you an hour to send a page...not
    familar with with protocols that fax's use.

    This a possible???

    1. Re:OS Project??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why "tarpit" a fax machine, when you can just send black pages as fast as possible and run it out of toner ?

      Secondly, what makes you think the scammers actually own a fax themselves ?

      The real way to deal with this is to set up hylafax, which reduces the problem to that toying up the line, because you don't have to print the scam faxes.

    2. Re:OS Project??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one time I used to have a dial-up on my box at home... After the sixth ring you'd get the modem wanting to negotate line speed and such... all my friends knew and hung up before the six ring...telemaketers weren't so lucky....in my minds eye I can still see them ripping the headsets off their skulls.

      If it was a fax it just got logged if I'd been evil I'd have come up with something to accept the fax but have a program negotiate a slow and slower line speed...please retransmint your last..rinse repeat. Longer they spend sending me a fax the
      less likely it is they get to your fax machine
      today ;)

  126. Answered your own question... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do I have nowhere to turn except an expensive lawyer, armed with no information about the company?

    No, you could always post an article on Slashdot with the actual 800 number, implicitly urging innumerable irritable geeks to inundate them with bizarre crank calls.

    Wait, you already did that.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  127. Here is an FTC link clarifying this... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 3, Informative

    800 number scams

    Seems you need to agree beforehand to a billing arrangement or provide a CC # before you begin recieving 'services'.

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
    1. Re:Here is an FTC link clarifying this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the phrase "When guns are criminalized, only criminals will have guns" ...
      It is illegal to charge the person that called the 800 number unless they agree to it but again, criminals don't follow the laws. If this were a real company sending out faxes illegally, why wouldn't they stoop so low as to place charges on their 800 number?

      Also the FTC doesn't mention that there are many sneaky ways to create a consent to be billed... "Hello, welcome to the XYZ travel agency, Please press 1 if you wish to connect to send a fax." "1" "Thank you... we will now transfer you to our fax machine" and what they won't say is that they now add a fax charge to your phone bill.

    2. Re:Here is an FTC link clarifying this... by XryanX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father is a lawyer, and he had to get his sister out of a nice sized psychic hotline bill.

      It turns out that they have to prove that you agreed to the charges, but then they usually don't inform you that you're being taped. Being that it's a crime to record someone's voice without their permission, they usually drop it.

  128. Nobody at home? by php+at+OH+dot+com · · Score: 1

    there was no answear when I called ... 7:56 EST

  129. vigilante by chri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I run a home business, and I feel utterly at the mercy of these parasites. Between calls, faxes and junk email, I am kept in a constant state of agitation and unproductivity. My plan has always been that if my business ever fails and I no longer have any monetary assets to loose, I will drop out of society and drift from city to city sabotaging telemarketers (stealing paper and toner, cutting phone lines, etc... nothing too violent). It is pleasing to know that I have a fall-back plan.

    I don't mean to give anyone ideas, but I'd be surprised if among the entire Slashdot community there isn't someone ready to do this. Such a person would become a hero to millions! One drawback is the possibility of prison time, and potential mistreatment - so keep this in mind. Also, don't physically hurt anyone.

    --
    greetings earthlings
    1. Re:vigilante by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the same idea too, cut phone lines and carry around a lead pipe.. just to give them a little scare. I think society needs to show these people that although they are a part of society, and their actions accumulate into substantial economic damages. Just because we are a civilized society doesn't mean people should be free from retaliation, even if they are following the law (which may or may not be the case). These people need to know that spamming may have severe social consequences.

  130. Is 1-800 really 1-900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that scammers were using what seemed to be a n 800 number was really a 900 toll call. So if you folks that call this 1-800 number repeatedly or hang on the line, you might just find yourself with a huge phone bill this Month.Greedy or revengeful people always get screwed in the end.

    1. Re:Is 1-800 really 1-900 by jubitzu · · Score: 2, Informative

      800 is always toll free. 899 or something like that might be a toll number. that is the scam you heard about.

    2. Re:Is 1-800 really 1-900 by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      1800 and 1-888 are always free

    3. Re:Is 1-800 really 1-900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1800 or 1888 are not always free.

      Mostly free, Not always free.

      In the US at least, you can be charged "Presubscription" fees legally, under certain conditions.

      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/tmarkg/tollfre e.htm tells more.

      On a related note, I've been billed for things like "web hosting" for ~100$ after being cold-called by some sales-drone in India (With a terrible accent and noisy phone line) and agreeing to a fax. The bill arrived in my phone bill.

      Needless to say, I was a cl00less fkcutard and did everything an automated system told me to do, instead of getting wise when they started asking me my name and if I approved it or not.

      I don't recall them telling me I would be automagically signed up for the service. So, borderline unethical and possibly even illegal. Needless to say, a halfhour call to the phone company refusing to pay got the charges cancelled.

  131. need a telephony expert by zogger · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this is possible, but this is my idea. Is it possible for the spam fax recipient, to have the specific incoming phone number from the spammers be redirected to one of those #900 pay for psychic phone sex lines at so many dollars per minute? I know you can get call forwarding, so... is this possible, to restrict the call forwarding to a specific incoming phone number, or would the bill show up at.. who's box? I don't know but I think you can see the idea here, Just automate the response so it turns around on them. Or have their spam go to another spammers number, and so on and so forth, the "telephone spam honeypot of doom".

    TSHOD © under the WTFC general purpose internet posting license

  132. I have a solution by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not yet sure of the details, but do you remember the scene in Brasil where the Central Services guys were "fixing" the HVAC systems in the appartment, and then Tuttle comes in on his zip line and does a cross-over between the sewer output line and the suit air input line and then the two Central Services guys suits fill up with sewage and explode? We need to somehow cross-connect the fax spammers with 419 scammers so they work on eachother.

  133. Re:Consistency here will be key to wardialing? by gmby · · Score: 1

    Time for a new OSS project.
    Wardialer with a recording.... bork bork!

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  134. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by aaronl · · Score: 1

    I see two problems with that approach.

    The first is that if a new company starts up, they have to find a way to get their name out there to businesses in some way. In the US, you simply avoid calling individuals and numbers on the Do-Not-Call list (which unfortunately costs thousands of dollars to get the entirety of). Cold calling businesses is a decent option for getting business. Then you can afford advertising and have some word of mouth going on.

    The second is that by refusing to do business with a company because they called you is a little silly. A lot of companies cold call for new leads. Most of them don't call people they have either already called recently, or who have asked to not be called again.

    As someone starting up a business, if you have better suggestions on how to get new clients, I'd love to hear them, though!

  135. Make your own telezapper by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    If you have a computer and a voice/fax modem and voicemail/fax software, it's easy enough to make your own telezapper. You can even do it with an regular answering machine, though you might find it difficult to make a high enough quality recording for it to work correctly. In both cases, you just pre-pend your answering message with the appropriate SIT tones and a few seconds of silence.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  136. Add above info to headline!!!! by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Add the above info to the headline, the last thing we want to do is annoy people with a legitimate business.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Add above info to headline!!!! by Kombat · · Score: 1

      the last thing we want to do is annoy people with a legitimate business.

      Hahah, really, is that so? Slashdot would never wish harm on "legitimate businesses," eh? Like the RIAA, MPAA, Microsoft, SCO, etc.?

      Now THAT'S news to me.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    2. Re:Add above info to headline!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      legitimate

      Main Entry: 1legitimate
      Pronunciation: li-'ji-t&-m&t
      Function: adjective
      Etymology: Middle English legitimat, from Medieval Latin legitimatus, past participle of legitimare to legitimate, from Latin legitimus legitimate, from leg-, lex law
      1 a : lawfully begotten; specifically : born in wedlock b : having full filial rights and obligations by birth [a legitimate child]
      2 : being exactly as purposed : neither spurious nor false [legitimate grievance] [a legitimate practitioner]
      3 a : accordant with law or with established legal forms and requirements [a legitimate government] b : ruling by or based on the strict principle of hereditary right [a legitimate king]
      4 : conforming to recognized principles or accepted rules and standards [legitimate advertising expenditure] [legitimate inference]
      5 : relating to plays acted by professional actors but not including revues, burlesque, or some forms of musical comedy [the legitimate theater]

  137. Re: They are based in Florida by MisterLawyer · · Score: 1
    Merritt Island, FL???

    No, this is the time share company. They are located in Asspen, Florida

  138. Money for Faxes by estitabarnak · · Score: 1

    www.faxwar.com Go there, it's a respectable site run by Tom Martino (that is to say, he pays to make it look that way), and they pay you cash when you send in your faxes to them. You can even fax your faxes to them (Can anyone say, irony?).

  139. No spam on eFax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had an eFax number for a couple years. I've never received a spam Fax. Does eFax know something?

    1. Re:No spam on eFax? by SonicBV · · Score: 1

      I have yet to receive anything but spam faxes on my eFax number. Even the test faxes that I sent from my father's fax machine didn't come through (if you're reading this, eFax, it's been three years and I'm still waiting). My conjecture? eFax doesn't know a damn thing.

      --
      -Brad V.
  140. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The first is that if a new company starts up, they have to find a way to get their name out there to businesses in some way.

    It's called: take out a Google ad or an ad in a newspaper, or advertise to your cronies (who wouldn't mind getting in touch with you again). Pass out coupons, everybody loves a "deal", but make sure you print them out at your own cost. Pissing off potential customers is no way to get business. Reminds me of the v|@gr4 spammers. Why do they keep adding typos into their messages? Because people are filtering out messages containing those words. Why are people filtering out those words? Because they don't want to listen to these spammers? Why are these spamming companies trying to thwart the filter? Beats me. Some people just need a lead pipe to the head.

  141. Re:How to fake... --- can't this hurt the innocent by AeroNate · · Score: 1

    What happens if the number you generate using your alogorithm happens to be the CC number of an actual Visa customer? Don't you cause them some undeserved headaches?

  142. Black paper faxes much much slower by acomj · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly the compression faxes use are based on the premise that its a text page is mostly white. Its much easier to tell when you could watch the fax come out (rolls of thermal paper... do they still have those?) Faxes of "cover sheets" would always come through quickly while pages with more stuff on them came through more slowly.

    I remeber stories of crooked contracters trying to prevent other bids by tieing up the fax machines by sending the "black fax"

  143. Re:How to fake... --- can't this hurt the innocent by nacturation · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, there's about a 1 in 10^13 chance of that happening for the actual number. Plus, you'd need to get the expiry date correct. Assuming a conservative 2 year window for month/year combinations, this makes it 24 times less likely you'd stumble upon a valid one. Oh, and not to mention the name wouldn't match. Suffice it to say I don't think you'd ever hit upon a valid credit card number with matching expiry in your lifetime.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  144. Anonymous call intercept by TomatoMan · · Score: 1

    ...is the only thing that worked for me. I was getting junk fax calls in the middle of the night, always from different sources. I talked to the FCC, I talked to the Attourney General of my state, they both said they'd take copies of the junk faxes for reference, but each complaint had to be processed individually. The one law firm supposedly dealing with junk faxes in my state on junkfaxes.org never responded to inquiry email.

    In the end I coughed up $5 a month to Verizon for "anonymous call intercept." All of the junk faxes came from anonymous sources that dodged caller ID, so this service bags them all. I hate having to pay to silence that crap, but it's better than being woken up in the middle of the night every fucking night. I did this about 2 months ago and haven't received a single junk fax (or telemarketing call, for that matter) since.

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
  145. some more numbers for the bored by menscher · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's great to save your junk mail in a folder, cause then you can grep for (800) numbers. Here are a few from the past week:

    1-800-KaBloom
    1-800-884-9510

    The first seems to want to sell flowers. You have to press 1 or 2 to talk to someone, so configure that into your modem dial scripts (a comma will add a pause in the dial sequence, so put in enough to let them answer before autodialing the extension).

    The second is trying to sell computers, and a human answers right away.

    I chatted with the people at both ends, and they were quite friendly. They said I'd have to ask customer service if I wanted to get my questions answered about how profitable their spamming was. Unfortunately customer service has already gone home for the day.

    Have fun!

  146. abuse!!! by jamesh · · Score: 1

    so let me get this straight... if a company somewhere has done something to piss me off, I just have to make up a story about how they are spammers, post it with a phone number to slashdot, and revenge is mine?

    I'm not saying that's what this poster did, but I would have liked some more proof first, probably more than can be given over the internet.

    1. Re:abuse!!! by iotashan · · Score: 1

      Well, here's the original fax, but I suppose you could say that I just Photochopped it. http://www.iotashan.com/spamfax.gif

  147. Old PC? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    My desktop has a modem on it and is always on. If I recall from my *ahem* telephone system study days, caller ID is a 2400 bps signal between the first and second ring, so picking it up should be trivial (Assuming your modem doesn't have some magic AT command for that anyway.) Configuring mgetty to answer certain numbers using the modem instead of letting the answering machine pick them up would be equally trivial. For style, you should send the query "How many nulls?" down the line should anyone ever attach a computer to it and let it connect.

    I've thought about setting up a voicemail system, but info on making voice modems work with Linux is few and far between. Last time I looked at it, it seemed like more of a pain in the ass than it'd be worth.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  148. I have dealt with similar bastards by whittrash · · Score: 1

    Those folks used to be based in New York. They sent our racist questionaire polls, of course people probably responeded, but in small type at the bottom was a note informing them that they would be charged $3.95 a minute. Their reply number was also a charge number. These same people seem to have moved over seas and are now at a UK number.

    A couple of points on overseas faxes. They are operating a business across international lines, that would mean they would need to have some kind of US subsidiary or they do not have permission to operate here. Send a note to Scotland Yard, informing them of the abuse, I don't know about British law, but I bet it is probably illegal to do these kinds of things from there. I could be wrong, but I believe 1(800) and 1(900) numbers are for the USA and Canada. Someone has to be here in the USA to receive the bills and pay them. Sending a fax from Britain is probably prohibitively expensive, I would wager it came from the US, but the call center was in Britain.

    You can also find out who owns the phone number block, and as a result contact their provider, informing them that these people are doing illegal acts. That may be your best option. Simply shut them down at the switch.

    For the smug bastards who think they are above the law, I believe the fines the US government levys against them can be applied to their phone bill.

    Contact your states Attorney General and US Attorney general to get legal action against them. Also try the British Embassy/consulate, they may be able to tell you their laws better, perhaps fax them a copy of your fax.

  149. Go a step further by BlueJay465 · · Score: 1
    Or you could just automate your VoIP program to call them every 30 seconds. Rack up the bills and annoy the hell out of them.

    Here is what you do. Set up your VoIP software to redial every 30 seconds after the call is disconnected, and everytime they pick up, play the following recording:

    "Your call is very important to us...please stay on the line for the next available representative." mix this message up in your winamp or XMMS playlist every minute or so to the worst collection of muzak, cheesy porno music or elevator music you can find (easy listening station?). Be sure to play this message or one similar to it aeveral times per song, so they know how important they are to you!

    Fight fire with fire, I say.
    1. Re:Go a step further by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      ...mix this message up in your winamp or XMMS playlist every minute or so to the worst collection of muzak, cheesy porno music or elevator music you can find.

      May I suggest the use of Spamradio? It seems fitting...

  150. Overseas faxes are now covered by US Law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CAN SPAM Act did one good thing... it amended the federal junk-fax law ... it used to read:

    It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States --

    and as of Jan. 1, 2005 it now reads:

    It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States--

    TCPALaw.com has copies of a lot of court cases against junk faxers, some of which came from out of the country.

  151. Time = Money... how to slow them down? by Scarhead · · Score: 1

    This idea won't stop them, but it should slow them down. On a staticy phone line, faxes drop down to slower speeds and retransmit lines that fail error correction.

    Any way to rig up a fax modem to receive faxes at the slowest rate possible and make the fax receipt take as long as possible? When I receive fax spam, I wonder if there are ways to tie up the sending machine for as long as possible. It would take them longer to send faxes. If enough of us do this, it should have an effect on how many the assholes can send.

    Time = money, and at least we can try hitting them in Time.

  152. how weird is this? by DaveKAO · · Score: 0

    Ok, I am putting in some late hours tonight, and my cubicle is next to our offices fax machine. Just got a fax from Flamingo Travel. Damn. /me is looking over shoulder... waiting for thought police to nab me.

  153. Innocent Flamingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello I am Maureen at Flamingo Travel Group. Someone sent me this link. I didn't know anyone was listening (watching) my news on my site. It kind of feels good that someone has and I am not shouting into the wind.
    We do not get commissions, faxes, kick backs or anything at all from Flamingo Travel in Florida. We have nothing to do with them at all. We only get the complaints when people search for a Flamingo Travel to get mad at. I have emailed Gov Bush, emailed the FCC, filed complaints with the Florida government and the Florida Attorney General. I don't know what else to do. I wish they would go away, they make my life hell, I don't approve of what they do, I hate time shares and telemarketers and blast faxers. I don't know how I can make it more plain than that. We have nothing to do with them and I would love to see them go out of business or get sued. We are a small company in Pennsylvania, the complaint calls are terrible and take up alot of our time. If you know how to get rid of them...please share the information with me.
    call or email me. My phone number is 1-800-325-7465 ext. 22 and my email is maureencarreno@flamingo-travel.com
    I can't sell you a $99 Disney deal any more than I can sell you the tooth fairy...some things just don't exist!
    I would be glad to give you copies of everything I have tried so far to get rid of the faxes. If I knew where that Flamingo travel was, I would punch the owner in the face!! Once again, I am open to your suggestions.

  154. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by tcgroat · · Score: 1
    Only a year? You are too kind! The problems with junk fax, telemarketing, and spam has been widely and thoroughly covered by the press and by various legislatures. No legitimate business can claim they didn't know it was a nuisance. If they do it even once, they deserve no future business. Not next year. Not ever! And be sure to tell everyone you know about it, so they can avoid dealing with shady characters, too.

    If one little mom-and-pop company tells them to take a hike, they write you off as a nut case and won't bug you no more. If two companies tell them to go pound sand--in harmony--they'll think you're subsidiaries and avoid the both of you. And if three companies--just three companies like IBM, GM, and WalMart--tell them "Call me again and we'll see you in court", they'll think its a movement. And that's what it is... (with apologies to Arlo Guthrie).

  155. Don't auto-print faxes by Corydon76 · · Score: 1
    Move to the solution that we have at our company: all faxes are received via computer fax modem, are reviewed by personnel, and printed if we want them. The fax image (if real business) can be additionally archived online, which has helped us out quite a bit, as paper faxes have a tendency to get lost or misplaced over time. (Also helps when the fax is received at the Tennessee office and needs to be reviewed in California after the Tennessee folks have gone home for the day).

    No, it won't solve the problem of junk faxes, but it does reduce the cost of dealing with them. Junk faxes get deleted and do not waste toner/paper.

  156. Data Protection Act by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If they are in the UK then you can mention the Data Protection Act which will apply to them. I bleieve that under this act you can insist they remove all computer records about you. Demonstrating some knowledge of our laws should at least remove the smug tone from their voice!

    To all the posts claiming that it is too expensive to send faxes from the UK, think again. For $2.95 a month here in Canada I get 6 cents (Canadian)/minute to the UK whereas for an extra $2.95/month I can only get 7 cents/minute to somewhere else in Canada so it would actually be cheaper to fax Canada from the UK than from within Canada!

    1. Re:Data Protection Act by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      I bleieve that under this act you can insist they remove all computer records about you.

      Does that mean they remove your number from a do-not-call list (so that they can call you again)? A lot of U.S. telemarketers don't mind hearing "take me off your calling list", since that means they don't know they're not supposed to call you again - versus the "put me on your do-not-call list", which legally requires them to stop calling you (although apparently doesn't stop them from selling your number to someone else who will call you).

  157. Getting them back by hawado · · Score: 3, Funny

    We used to get a fax for free hair stuff until we took a 6 foot length of paper wrote "Stop Faxing us" on it, fed one end into our fax machine, created a big loop and faxed it back to the company once they had cloed up for the night... If you can get their fax number by hook or by crook... give it a try. If anything it will either tie up their computer fax or kill thier stack of paper and toner in one night.

    --
    Feed my eyes...
    1. Re:Getting them back by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      1. Take four or so sheets of black (yes, black) construction paper.
      2. Tape them end to end, on the short edges, resulting in an 8.5x44 or so banner.
      3. Fax this to your victim. Once about half of it is though, tape the leading edge to the trailing edge, resulting in a big ole loop.
      4. ???
      5. Profit. Or amusement. Quite possibly, a broken fax machine on the other end.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  158. AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to deal constantly with smartasses who thought they could fix things but screw them up even worse.

    NOBODY is allowed to fuck around with anything here that already works! If it ain't broke, don't fix it. We don't care how great you think you are, or how well you "fixed" your mother's computer -- if you touch that company device without written instructions to do so, you are fired.

  159. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by B747SP · · Score: 1
    Only a year? You are too kind!

    Oh, I tell them it's only for a year :-) The way I see it, in my own kooky little frame of reference, is that if I tell them "not ever", they'll write me off as a kook but keep spamming me out of spite anyway. If I tell them "one year" there is light at the end of the tunnel, and they might get it in their heads that if they play nice, they might get some of my money one day. Now if I was just a little Mum-and-Dad company, it probably wouldn't count for a whole lot, but I work for a big big company with lots of money, and most of them are really keen to get some of that money!

    Some of them just can't help themselves though. Those morons at the printer-pushing company seem to be able to make it to about 10 months, then they let another round of spam fax fly!

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  160. If one were to read through. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    the responses to this story and do a little measuring and thinking rather than demanding that others do all the research and providing of proof, one would discover that more than one person in this case has complained about the same group of spammers.

    In any case, I seriously doubt anybody here is going to get involved by directly retaliating against the company in question. The poster is simply asking for advice from an experienced knowledge pool in how to deal with fax spammers. This is called "Networking"; it promotes discussion and thought. It is a very useful tool in solving all manner of problem. Your false brand of skepticism, however, only vilifies the victim and aids nobody but the aggressor.


    -FL

  161. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by B747SP · · Score: 1
    The first is that if a new company starts up, they have to find a way to get their name out there to businesses in some way.

    Yes, that's fine and all, but the bit that I have trouble with is, these people know they're being offensive, they've gotta know that they're pissing off their customer base.

    Maybe I'm crediting them with way too much intelligence, but as I see it, you'd have to be pretty dumb not to see that what you're doing is...
    1. Irritate potential customers
    2. Irritate potential customers more

    The bit that I just don't understand is, given that step 1 and step 2, how the hell do these morons end up with
    3. Profit!!!

    The second is that by refusing to do business with a company because they called you is a little silly.

    Now I'm gonna disagree with you there. See, I don't like people who cold call me. If I'm at my desk, I'm usually trying very hard to concentrate on something. If you break my concentration, I'm probably not going to be feeling all that neigbourly. this may come as something of a surprise to you, but I'm actually not nearly as enthusiastic about whatever widget it is that you want to sell me as you are.

    A lot of companies cold call for new leads.

    ... with the misguided impression that cold calls generate actual sales. Maybe it worked, way back when. I'm telling you, it has become such a problem, that it doesn't ever work on me, even if I'm shopping right now for whatever it is you're selling.

    It is widely accepted that the only way to stop spammers is for them to realise that spamming is unprofitable. The only way they're gonna figure that out is if no-one, ever, buys from them.

    If I'm shopping for widgets, I'll google for widgets, I'll look in the yellow pages, the white pages and the classifieds. I'll ask colleagues and friends "Do you know anyone who sells good widgets?". I will not, ever, buy from a cold calling widget salesdroid.

    if you have better suggestions on how to get new clients, I'd love to hear them, though!

    Depends on the product I s'pose. If it's something IT, buy google ads, attend trade shows, give good demos at the trade shows, and try to hide that air of desperation that seems to cloud the presentation of many first timers. Submit your product for review at reputable review sites, ones that tell it how it is, like Dan's Data, and not those dodgy reviews for hire places that make it all stardust and rainbows.

    I block banner ads, pretty much the only thing I actively look at are google ads, and other plain text ads. I pretty much always google for "widget reviews". I do two passes at trade shows, one in t-shirt and jeans - being invisible makes it easier to check everything out, then I go back in some sort of corporate wear and talk to the folks whose products I spotted yesterday. (maybe that means you shouldn't write off the folks in t-shirts and torn jeans, I dunno). Don't *ever* spam. Don't ever do anything that looks like spam. If you're on slashdot or usenet giving advice on a similar subject to what you're selling, say "Caveat: I work for company X, and I sell these things" along with your advice. There's a company in Australia called "Underdog Leathers" - they make pretty decent leathers for motorcyclists, but they have issues making sales with usenet folks, 'cos one of their guys spent a lot of time on usenet saying "Check out underdog leathers, I heard they're great" without ever divulging his interest. He got caught out, he lost a lot of sales. No-one minds you combining advice and a feww plug, so long as you're honest about it. All in all, I think it's probably a lot cheaper to market in a customer friendly way than it is to be a spamming cold calling bastard!

    Finally, know this: If you fax me, or call me, or put glossy brochures in my snailmail box, and I didn't ask you to do that, I'm not gonna buy your product from you, ever. In fact, I'm such a spitefull prick that if I like your product, I'll go and source the same thing from someone else.

    I hope that lot helps!

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  162. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by Alsee · · Score: 1

    SPAM! Millions and millions of SPAMS!

    And newsgroup posts! There are at least 40,000 newsgroups. Say you send ten posts to each newsgroup each day, that's 400,000 posts per day or 146 million posts per year!

    Or you can skip computers and go with a real-world direct advertizing. Buy a few cases of spraypaint (it's cheaper by the case). You can spraypaint your contact number on walls, windows, cars, everywhere.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  163. How bored are we? by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    while :; do echo ATDT1800whatever >/dev/modem; sleep 60; done

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  164. disconnected my fax line by mabu · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, all the anti-unsolicited-fax laws, like much of the malarky the government passes that it expects to magically work, didn't. I ended up just disconnecting my fax line and I don't use faxes any more. E-mail file-attachments basically make faxes obsolete anyway, but it does suck that marketers ruined the whole thing. No more fax line for me.

  165. US courts may have jurisdiction by Tremo · · Score: 1

    If they are doing business in the USA, they probably do come under jurisdiction of the US court system. Consult your lawyer.

  166. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by DrHyde · · Score: 1

    So I'm meant to subsidise your business startup costs with my fax paper, my toner, and my time? Fuck you! If you want to make me aware of your business and your fine products, then do what reputable businesses do, and pay for an advert in the newspapers.

  167. FPS is the wrong people. by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative
    but rather smugly told me that they are in England so they do not have to obey the US unsolicited fax laws. She wouldn't provide me with any other company information, and then stopped answering calls from my number after repeated hang-ups. The FCC says that it is a civil matter, and to go through the courts. The Fax Preference Service in the UK says they cannot help people outside the UK.

    First, a bit about UK law, which they do have to comply with if they are doing this from the UK. If you contact them directly and ask to be removed from their list, then they are committing an offense if they call you again.

    The FPS is a UK-wide do not call list maintained by the Direct Marketers Association. All marketers are supposed to treat it the same as having called them directly to be removed from the list, but the only penalty for not following this seems to be a slap on the wrist and maybe getting booted out of the DMA. The DMA is not interested in enforcing the law, particularly against non-members.

    Ultimately, enforcement is up to Ofcom and the Information Commissioner. If you do make a complaint, be sure to include the response you got from FPS, I'm sure they'd be interested to see how self-policing by the DMA really works.

  168. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by Faithman2k · · Score: 1

    I'm in Sydney too.
    And I've had the same problem.
    Regarding faxes, I have started invoicing the company for my time and effort involved in receiving their fax. I start at $110 per page which is GST inclusive. They have opted in to MY business relationship. If they don't pay up I report them to Credit Agencies as default accounts (See Baycorp). I don't know how legal all this is, but it seems to work. you get some majorly pissed off people calling back OR you get $110 pocket money.

  169. How ironic. by bigchris · · Score: 1

    According to this site eFax is actually a propagator of fax spam.

  170. No they Don't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Track them down and kill them.
    And no, I'm not joking. They deserve death.


    No, death is too good for them. I'm thinking something more along the lines of Vogon poetry or fome fruit and a piece of string....

    The Anonymous Bastard

  171. How 1-800 reporting works by Kombat · · Score: 1

    Do remember that the recipient of an 800 call gets your phone number reported to them.


    No they don't. They get a report of the number of complete and incomplete calls made from your area code, in the 3 different time-of-day codes (day, evening, and weekend). They'd see that 20 calls came from your area code, and the total number of minutes in each time-of-day category, but they wouldn't see the individual numbers that made the calls.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  172. Re:My solution: "I won't purchase from you for a y by Steve+B · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of the v|@gr4 spammers. Why do they keep adding typos into their messages? Because people are filtering out messages containing those words. Why are people filtering out those words? Because they don't want to listen to these spammers? Why are these spamming companies trying to thwart the filter? Beats me.

    Why doesn't the government arrest them for bypassing security in order to gain unauthorized access to your computer? Because the government hasn't had its feet held to the fire and made to do its one legitimate job (defense of persons and property).

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  173. Re:worthless calls = no more customers for aggrega by Steve+B · · Score: 1
    if what you deliver (in this case, callers) is worthless (in this case, geeks looking to ask if their fridge is running

    I trust that they at least got the word to let Prince Albert out of the can before he suffocated.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  174. Use their weapons against them! by RogerBacon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Think, Gentlemen, think! Modern technology is a two-edged sword. They want to make random offers to all and sundry with no repercussions. Use their indifference and lack of proper managment against them. Use their business systems and software usage against them!

    When you start receiving repeated offers from a fax marketer, determine who the company really is, play along to get them to send a for-real offer via fax, then fax them a rejection of their offer and fax them a counteroffer to "evaluate future fax advertising materials". for $500.00 per each junk advertising fax you receive in the future.

    Note specifically in your counteroffer fax that you are responding to their initial fax offer and their faxed followup for-real offer. Throw in a few terms and conditions like: liquidated damages of $2500 (or the maximum your local small claims court will give), net 30 billing, the name you will bill them under (such as "Advertising Evaluation Services Company"), and MOST IMPORTANT: TELL THEM THAT THEY CAN ACCEPT YOUR COUNTEROFFER BY SENDING ANOTHER FAX ADVERTISEMENT FOR THEIR GOODS AND SERVICES TO YOUR FAX NUMBER, THE SAME ONE THEY HAVE ALREADY BEEN USING. Otherwise (you tell them) they no longer have your permission to use your computer and computer supplies (such as fax paper and toner) by sending advertisements to your fax number.

    Now, when you receive their next fax, do exactly what you said you would do in your counteroffer: take a look at it, then prepare a bill for your time and send it to their billing office. They may pay it right away, especially if it looks official, you use some business-like name and provide a nice classy professional description of your services. If they do not pay, after a couple months file suit in small claims court for the maximum small claims amount allowed, typically $2000-5000 or so. (assuming, of course, your faxed counteroffer had a per-occurence liquidated damages clause of whatever that maximum is.

    So what happens? They may pay automatically. If not, you file suit in small claims. By the time they realize that they have made an offer (the initial fax and/or the followup fax), received a counter offer (your fax back to them with your rejection and your modified terms) and have accepted the counteroffer (when they kept sending you advertisements), it will be too late. You will have hardcopies of their initial offer, your counteroffer, and copies of the faxes you received in response to your counteroffer. If I were a small claims judge, I would see this as a slam dunk case in your favor, and would be laughing hysterically in chambers afterward when I ordered them to cough up the cash. Of course, it only works if the company is local or regional and therefore amenable to small claims.

    You see, the internet and fax machines permit them to go make offers like crazy, throwing trash terms and advertisements at everyone heedlessly. They do not check up on who is sending the offers out, whether illegally to blocked numbers or not. They just don't care. Their management systems are not tight and things (like obeying the law and actually reading your counteroffer) fall between the cracks.

    The process I describe above, as long as you respond to their faxes, as long as you tell them very plainly exactly what you are going to do and how you will bill them, etc, and as long as you keep paper copies of all the faxes you receive from them and send to them, cannot be considered as fraud. Believe me, if they catch on only after paying several of your bills, they will feel like utter fools, but there is no judge in the land who would find your actions to be fraudulent or criminal if you were quite upfront. Indeed, most would gleefully realize how you finessed the fax monsters and order them to pay up immediately in small claims.

    NOTE: I am not your attorney. If you want an attorney, hire one. If you are interested in this idea, take it to your local attorney and get his opinion.

  175. Ask for more info by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    Call 'em up and ask for more information. Maybe you'll get enough info on the Florida company to complain to the authorities in Florida.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  176. xpedite in England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi there. I got fax spammed last week on my voice line. Very annoying. So I hooked up my modem and had a look at the actual fax when the spamming system redialled my number. It was a ringtone advertisement for www.beltonen.nl (yes, I live in the Netherlands.) According to our nic, the owner of the site is Denda Multimedia, based in the Netherlands. I called them up and asked them to remove my number from their database. Also, I asked them how they got my number and how they got the idea that I have a fax running on my number. Reply: they bought it from a company called xpedite (www.xpedite.co.uk) based in London. Could this be your bad guy??

  177. Dialing error rate by OmniGeek · · Score: 1

    Consider, as point of interest, that the phone system itself is responsible for some misdials. The original analog phone system design requirement was for high availability, i.e. the system is always up and running. The error rate in connecting calls was (quite reasonably) a lower priority, as that's a minor nuisance at best (1% of dialed calls going astray will be little noticed nor long remembered; 1% no-dialtone in a year is 3.65 days, which is VERY objectionable).

    As a consequence, the classic phone system's inherent misdial rate is nontrivial, and is likely to be a significant fraction of misdialed calls, after user error. I suspect this trend continues to be the case with the mostly-digital systems now in use (anyone know the DTMF mis-recognition rate?). Soooo, not ALL of those wrong numbers are the fault of the caller...

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
    1. Re:Dialing error rate by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the phone system itself is responsible for some misdials. The original analog phone system design requirement was for high availability, i.e. the system is always up and running.

      Just to point out that the when the phone system was designed, they had no term "high availability". It is a machine. They built it well. Just as everyone who built any kind of machine at the time.

      The term "high availability" wasn't invented (due to lack of necessity) until people began attempting to run web servers on Windows.

      Necessity is the mother of invention. (Lazyness is the father.)

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  178. We get faxes every week from them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I called the number today..

    Them: 'Answering service'
    Me: 'I'd like to book a flight to Cancun' (we get faxes with Cancun as one of the destinations)
    T: 'I'm not sure what you're talking about'
    M: 'I got a fax with this number on it. I was just calling to find out more information.'
    T: 'Well, I'm still not sure what you're talking about'
    M: 'I get a fax every week from this number.. I just thought I'd call and find out more information. It suggests flights to Cancun, Florida, et. cetera.'
    T: 'We've been getting a lot of calls lately...'
    the rest is a few exchanges shrunk down to a few
    M: The faxes I get don't have a company name, just a number.
    T: What's the number?
    M: 1 800 ....
    T: That's the number you're calling.
    M: I'm just trying to figure out what's going on. I'll check my number and try and get more information.
    T: ok, have a nice day.
    M: thanks, you too.

    Poor answering service lady. We seriously do get faxes all the time with travel offers. It may not be the same company.. It doesnt ever have a company name on it. I just threw it in the trash yesterday. Wish i had that 800 number memorized. (I should by now)..

    It sounds like they're too cheap to have an actual operator on staff and they contract out to someone else who call forwards it to the office when a valid call goes through. I'd take it easy on the answering serivce lady, she'll probably quit today. She probably answers phone for several 800 numbers.

  179. Yes, they do. It's called ANI by Fencepost · · Score: 1
    Automatic Number Identification is the system used to send information on calling numbers to people with 800 numbers. It's not automatic - if you have an 800 number just forwarded to a regular phone number you may not have it - but it's available particularly to folks who have inbound trunk lines instead of just a set of POTS lines. Some people probably don't get a list of numbers because they're not that interested, some people get them with their bills, and high-volume sites can get them in realtime along with the other call signaling information. Sites that decide to go with that last option often do it because they're pulling information from a database indexed by the calling number, then passing that information along to the terminal/PC in front of the person who answers your call.

    One thing worth noting is that ANI *is not* the same thing as Caller ID - it's been around longer, it operates differently, and it's not blocked by *67 or whatever is used in your area.

    Plenty more technical information is available if you're really curious, just search for it.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  180. Really? by Scott+Richter · · Score: 1
    It's nice that you read that somewhere, but you have no fucking clue how to actually do it, and neither do any of the junk faxers/telemarketers.

    Conclusions jumped to a bit quickly. I don't have to know how, because you can buy shit to do it, like Here. And I imagine spammers of whatever ilk are their main customers. So you're wrong on both counts.

    An inbound call blocker based on caller ID is a brilliant idea and would sell very well, especially if it had an RS-232 interface on it.

    So brilliant it was invented years ago. You have no idea what you're talking about AC.

  181. Complain to Ofcom (Office of Communications). by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Nuisance/Unsolicited calls or fax are certainly against the rules and the company can be cut off of even prosecuted.

    http://www.ofcom.org.uk.

  182. Other Spammer Number 1-888-211-8303 by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Iotashan - Thanks for posting the GIF! I see they also have another number to call to remove yourself (or to Slashdot...)

    I don't see Flamingo Travel's name in there anywhere, but I'm guessing they've got multiple versions of their spam ad. There's some stuff scrawled down the side which I can't read in the fax - I'm guessing that it's whatever fax machine headers they're doing? Is it legible?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Other Spammer Number 1-888-211-8303 by iotashan · · Score: 1

      The 888 number is just an automated line. $5 says they just collect the numbers from that line, and add them to more lists. The suff on the side that is illegible is actually what my fax machine attaches to the fax, not thiers. It's just the date, their Fax ID ("travel"), number of pages, and my fax number. Maybe I should have blurred that out :)

  183. salt in the wound by tregoweth · · Score: 1

    and some innocent parties are falling victim

    And that was before they got Slashdotted...

  184. If you are trying to get them to talk by iotashan · · Score: 1

    The original fax is at http://www.iotashan.com/spamfax.gif. Ask them about the Disney Vacation for $99.

  185. jason.r.miller@dmu.edu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jason.r.miller@dmu.edu

    jason.r.miller@dmu.edu

  186. spam faxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here are some more numbers being used to spam disney vacations 800-456-0034 800-456-9302 800-676-8028 800-349-0569 these people are worse than the other one

  187. spam faxes by susieq12345 · · Score: 1

    tip ask for steve dickerson owner of the company located in casselberry fl he is a real jerk he thinks he cant be stopped !!!!!!!!!!

  188. ask for the owner by susieq12345 · · Score: 1

    here is the real numbers for the spamers 800-456-0034 800-456-9302 800-676-8028 800-349-0569

  189. this guys a jerk call there new # by buzzed1101 · · Score: 1

    i asked for the owner and i guess i got the guy because he got all worked up call 800-456-0034 800-456-9302 800-676-8028 800-349-0569

  190. the poor schmuck with same name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey there,

    This is the poor shmuck with the same name as the mass spam faxer. I forgive all the "Karma Whores" out there for calling and faxing us. The only thing we are really guilty of is naming a travel agency in Pennsylvania after a skinny legged pink tropical bird. We have nothing to do with spam faxes or emails...it wasn't too long ago when I believed that spam was mere luncheon meat. I wouldn't touch the spam of pork shoulder and ham and I wont touch techno spam made by a pig either.
    If the slash doters have any power for change, I would appreciate your assistance. A call to arms if you will.
    I challenge you all to write to the Florida attorney general and send him copies of all the bad flamingo faxes and copies of this site.
    Today we recieved a letter from a lawyer in Missouri that wants to sue us for sending the faxes we don't send. I am not frightened, because we are innocent and that is easy enough to prove. I am annoyed that what we have spent 5 years builing online and 19 years building in the business world in general is getting it's reputation sullied by a spam animal!!
    PLEASE HELP!!
    Maureen Kelly Carreño
    Director of Leisure Sales
    The INNOCENT Flamingo Travel Group
    www.flamingo-travel.com
    maureencarreno@fla mingo-travel.com

  191. call this one by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    1-800-783-9203

    "come enjoy the florida sun-n-fun!"
    $79 price per person / dbl. occupancy

    your package includes
    orlando -disney area 4 days / 3 nights + 2 free theme park passes

    ft. lauderdale FL
    3 days / 2 nights

    daytona beach fl
    3 days / 2 nights

    plus mexico get-a-way
    5 days / 4 nights your choice of puerto vallarta or cancun

    2 round trip airline tickets
    plus 2 nights acoomodations at your choide of
    las vegas or jamaica

    call now toll free 800 783 9203

    limited availability blah blah
    to be removed blah blah 1-888-211-4409