Slashdot Mirror


AlphaGrip's 3D Keyboard Ready For Pre-Orders

bic2k writes "AlphaGrip has opened their doors to pre-orders this past week. (Previously mentioned here.) Press release can be found here. They look a lot like an xbox controller, but contains 42 buttons and a analog stick. Shows up as a standard USB keyboard and mouse. Has a USB expansion slot, which will possibly be used for wireless connectivity. They claim typing speeds of 50 WPM or better after a month or so. They're waiting for 5000 pre-orders before going to manufacturing, so it may be awhile before they actually ship these."

346 comments

  1. First impression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's hard to see from the image, but shift-drag looks like it could be a b*tch.

    1. Re:First impression... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

      The real question is: are emacs key combinations even possible with it? it's already a bit of a challenge on a full size "normal" keyboard...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:First impression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use vi :P

      Seriously, though -- the old compulsive vi escape action looks as though it'd just be transferred from the left pinky (or the "whole hand hitting the escape button" of relief) to the left thumb with this sucker. Might even work.

    3. Re:First impression... by otomo_1001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That and don't forget us vi users. That looks like a nightmare to mode switching unless it has a button for escape and :

      Ironically enough, one reason I love the japanese keyboard layout, the colon is it's own key, no shift. :)

      The shifted letters over the numbers really messes with you when you are used to your paren's to be at 9 and 0, not 0 and -. That threw me off for months.

    4. Re:First impression... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Informative
      The shifted letters over the numbers really messes with you when you are used to your paren's to be at 9 and 0, not 0 and -.

      If you map a convenient combo such as Alt-K like so:
      :imap <M-k> ()<Left>

      then you'll never have strain your pinky reaching up for parentheses again, and you automatically stay balanced. I've done that for many of the obvious quotes and brackets (If you do this, helps to imap something like Ctl-L to <Right> and Alt-L to <End>). It saves tons of typing on hard-to-reach keys.

    5. Re:First impression... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      This looks very close to what I'm looking for.

      I want a remote control with a little trackball and sms-style thumb keyboard.

      I've seen one with the trackball and a lot of buttons, but not a thumb-typing layout.

      It seems with all the living room computers in use now, a remote like this would sell well. I'd buy one.

    6. Re:First impression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the ESC key is on the lower left front control surface, the colon key is on the back (right hand) and is shifted (white-shift key is on the upper left front control surface), and W and Q are easily pressed with the bottom two fingers of the left hand. So there should be no problem escaping vi :)

    7. Re:First impression... by ce25254 · · Score: 1

      I gave up on the Japanese layout because of the location apostrophe. I seem to end up typing with quite a few contractions, and couldn't get used to shift-7. I agree about the non-shifted colon, though--nice for vi.
      Hm, only one apostrophe in this message.

  2. How Fast? by ttyp0 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is 50 words per minute suppose to be good? I can easily double that on a QWERTY keyboard.

    1. Re:How Fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lucky you, I can't even think that fast.

    2. Re:How Fast? by Sasha+Slutsker · · Score: 0

      No, 50 WPM is not that fast. However, you must consider that they are typing on a gaming pad, so it's pretty fast for that. Plus, that's for the first month. If one keeps using it, I bet that they could get much better and type faster than 50 WPM on the thing.

    3. Re:How Fast? by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I agree... I have never had any sort of touch typing training, and honestly just use a glorified hunt and peck typing method, but still manage to type around 70wpm... seems like a pretty useless product.

      Also is anywone else reminded of an old product (maybe from 10 years ago?) called The Bat (at the bottom of that page)?

      Rob

    4. Re:How Fast? by Googo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      try doing that on a qwerty without a table or stand in front of you to put the keyboard on while stonding. Well I guess you could hang the keybord from your neck or something, but i'm pretty sure it will feel awkward as hell and you won't be moving around much then.

    5. Re:How Fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody throws around how fast they can type. Where exactly was this tested, or are you just pulling that stat out of your ass? Methinks the latter.

    6. Re:How Fast? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Why the strange contraption? Why not just get a DVORAK keyboard layout if compatibility is not a problem?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    7. Re:How Fast? by Tlosk · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is why:

      http://reason.com/9606/Fe.QWERTY.shtml

    8. Re:How Fast? by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In high school typing class I was at 96WPM.

      When my ex-wife was in college, she was in a computer class, and they had a typing test, which after the test it would show the result. I got 102WPM and 99% accuracy. It was annoying that it considered a backspace an error, so it took me a couple tries to remember not to correct errors.

      A couple years ago, a coworker brought a commercial typing test in to work, which said I was up to 104WPM at 100% accuracy.

      Not that it really helps me much with work, I bang out several lines of code, and consider what I'm going to write next. :)

      Do you have suggestions on typing speed tests. I like to see where I am occasionally.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:How Fast? by Copperhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      Uncomfortable is right! Imagine trying to defeat the forces from hell with a keyboard hanging around your neck, and a dreamcast on your back, and you'll realize why I keep losing!

      what? Typing of the Dead was the bomb!

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    10. Re:How Fast? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      There's no way you can hunt and peck 70wpm. No friggin' way.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    11. Re:How Fast? by erlenic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have personally witnessed a friend get 90 WPM, 100% accuracy, with a modified hunt and peck.

    12. Re:How Fast? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A tachometer for the computer would be cool... "You are now typing 70 words per minute!" How awesome would that be...

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    13. Re:How Fast? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Typically, after hunting and pecking for years, users remember where each key is and can develop consistently quick and accurate typing skills (all the while glancing at the keyboard). 90wpm may be stretching it, but I don't doubt that the H&P method can be perfected after awhile.

      Then again, years of practice take the 'hunt' out of it, so you should just call it pecking.

    14. Re:How Fast? by coyotedata · · Score: 0

      MrGreen it comes with a loop on the back so you can mount it on the wall once you have painted the numbers.

    15. Re:How Fast? by Whyrph · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the author has ever tried to type on a Dvorak keyboard? You'll notice pretty quickly that your fingers have to move a LOT less. I'm sure that's a good thing from an ergonomic standpoint.

    16. Re:How Fast? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      I used to see stuff like that back in the DOS/Win3.1 days.. You could get an odometer for your mouse too, to see how many miles you moved it. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:How Fast? by offpath3 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who blew off the teacher in typing class and does hunt and peck with only his index and middle fingers and one thumb, and the guy consistantly beat the snot out of me on typing tests, and I was doing about 65wpm at the time.

    18. Re:How Fast? by theendlessnow · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was supposed to read: 50 1337 words per minute.

    19. Re:How Fast? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative
      Do you have suggestions on typing speed tests.

      gtypist

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:How Fast? by jbrader · · Score: 1

      and that's after a month of practice. I could peck on a qwerty with my nose and go faster than that.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    21. Re:How Fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm...on the one hand, I have attacks on studies that show that Dvorak is an improvement over QWERTY as well as a couple of studies that show QWERTY to be superior.

      On the other hand I have my own personal experience in switching to Dvorak where, despite 10+ years of QWERTY use (~5 programming for a living), I was able to increase my own typing speed in approximately three weeks (was 90wpm with QWERTY, above 100wpm with Dvorak.)

      So which should I believe?

      If you want a true argument against Dvorak, it's that everyone else uses QWERTY. My QWERTY typing skills have dropped to about 50wpm now. Given how often I have to use other people's computers, I wish I could have maintained my previous rate.

    22. Re:How Fast? by Beardydog · · Score: 1

      I did about the same thing. We had a typing class in elementary school, with poorly thought out software. Our teacher wasn't very attentive, so I wound up memorizing the four paragraph final tests, and using the same glancey-pecky style I've used since I got my hands on a Mac SE at eight years old.

      I do wish for mad touch typing skizzles from time to time, mainly while I'm copying from paper to screen, or doing well made typing tests. But most of the typing I do is creative, and then I have no trouble going long stretches at high speeds.

    23. Re:How Fast? by ambrosine10 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever tried Dvorak? This piece is a good counterargument to that Reason article. And the authors miss the point. I use Dvorak and true, I don't type any faster than with QWERTY. But that's not the point. No one can say the Dvorak doesn't have better ergonomics. People use it for comfort, not for speed.

    24. Re:How Fast? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      Wheee. That's .. well .. ugly. :)

      On the "English ktouch lecture lessons (ktlecten.typ), Lesson 15, I got 110.82wpm with 0.0% errors.

      The short ones are too short to come up with a good number. Well, the numbers were too good. I was over 120wpm. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    25. Re:How Fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You could get an odometer for your mouse too, to see how many miles you moved it. :)

      Gnome had something like this until 1.4 ... it was even themeble, hows that :D

    26. Re:How Fast? by Mr.Cookieface · · Score: 1
      Exactly.

      It's great if you want to type while walking or riding a bike or something.

      Seriously though, when I have my computer display sunglasses and I'm walking down the street, how do search for porn without having to break out a keyboard? We'll have to get rid of the keyboard sooner or later.

      Have you been looking for you lighter the past ten minutes? Or are you just on Slashdot again?

    27. Re:How Fast? by am+2k · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not that it really helps me much with work, I bang out several lines of code, and consider what I'm going to write next. :)

      I'm pretty sure it does help you, it's some kind of direct brain-computer connection.

      To get a feeling how it's like without that, try switching to Dvorak for a few hours (if you're using QWERTY usually, that is). When I did that, I felt totally helpless, because I had to search for every single key (like non-typists have to do on every layout). When you have to concentrate on typing, there's not much time left to think about your program.

    28. Re:How Fast? by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't need a Dvorak keyboard. I just need to get really drunk and use a keyboard that the alignment dots (on the F and J) are worn down. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    29. Re:How Fast? by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      KDE has one :)

    30. Re:How Fast? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      if i could type at 5000 wpm, i would be ok, because i sit there, doing nothing, thinking, and then all of a suddon, a massive chunk of code attacks me, and i have to type it all out within 30 seconds or it all goes away (no, planning is the spawn of the devil).

      when i start forgetting what i thought of, i forget what the (sensibly named) modules and functions mean and exactly what arguements they accept and what value they pass back. Then i have to read the code and wait for it to come back to me, then the mad rush again. rince lather repeat.

    31. Re:How Fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a lot of people don't seem to realize is that this kind of product is most likely to be used by people that suffer from some form of RSI, not some random person wanting to type faster. A company that tries to sell these things to everyone is most likely shooting themselves in the foot.

      However, if you look at the market for RSI-targeted typing devices (a lot of them don't even look like keyboards), $99 is both a really great price, and it's low enough that a number of RSI sufferers will take the chance on it. As someone who's dealt with carpel tunnel for a number of years, a hundred bucks is a heck of a bargain when you consider that it's preventing massive amounts of pain and annoyance.

    32. Re:How Fast? by Torham · · Score: 1

      Doesn't ktouch only display char/minute? Is there a way to change it to wpm?

    33. Re:How Fast? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      You sound like a man that needs a portable voice recorder. :)

      My inspirations usually come to me at the wrong times, like when I'm sleeping, or driving somewhere.. I have to concentrate to keep the details til I can stop and write them down.

      I used to make my assistant (now regional sr. admin) laugh, I'd have problems, and start just talking at him. not really with him, everything I'd say was going over his head, because if I have to talk through something, it's usually pretty complex. But, I'd talk at him for 5 minutes, explaining the problem, and then come up with the answer, and thank him. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    34. Re:How Fast? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      I did the Windows version, beacuse I was downstairs smoking (I don't smoke in the room my Linux machines are in), so I installed the one version behind Win32 compile. It showed WPM.

      My CPM should be 5x higher. If I remember right, a "word" for WPM is 5 characters.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    35. Re:How Fast? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      a portable voice recorder is no good - i cant talk fast enough either (and i talk fast anyway). If i started speaking, i think i'd forget the whole thing - typing is more transparent for me.

      talking through something is an idea that originates from IBM (according to my programming tutor). they used to have cardboard indians that the programmers used to have to talk to before taking a problem to the boas.

    36. Re:How Fast? by dotlively · · Score: 2

      Free online typing speed tests (Java required for both):

      http://www.typingtest.com/
      http://www.typingpal.com/

      Taken from:

      Is Typing a Necessary Skill?

      http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=116796&c id =9883355

    37. Re:How Fast? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have never learned to touch-type in the approved fashion. My hands are too large to comfortably rest on the home keys, but as no one makes a keyboard scaled up by 25 percent or so I'm SOL in that departmment. I generally use all of my fingers on occasion but I focus on using the index fingers and the right thumb, and my pinkies for shift keys, the home and end keys, and so on. My middle fingers occasionally team up with my index fingers to bang out some word as well, but my index fingers do the majority of the work by far.

      Using this style of typing I regularly achieve over 80 WPM and typically when on the phone with someone and typing I am queried as to how I learned to type so fast. It really blows people's minds when they see me type on a good day, on a keyboard which I'm used to, because I can generally do 75 WPM at over 99% accuracy.

      The good news is that on a non-"ergonomic" keyboard, I can touch type, so as long as I don't think too hard about what I'm doing, I can type in the dark.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:How Fast? by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      NICE - it's so funny because it's so right.

      I have the same problem when I drink and switch to a non ergonomic keyboard. Hands at different angles, and it throws me off quite a bit.

      I was just thinking about the brain-computer connection through my hands, and while doing so was watching my fingers type the words my mind was thinking about. I don't seem to have any direct control anymore over how they type exactly. If I think hard about how to spell the word and connecting that to my fingers hitting those keys, I slow WAY down. Personally, I haven't had a WPM score below 110 since I was about 9 years old. I use gtypist for my son, as he is learning to type.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    39. Re:How Fast? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      BAT as divined by Doug Engelbart has a big disadvantage: You operate it with your left hand while mousing with the right one (Or else you use your right hand for both tasks with speed loss). You use only one hand dividing your speed in two. The alternative may be a 2-handed BAT-like device (mouse inside) since in 14-button configuration you can devote keys to the most used letters and chord only remaining letters. It may give you additional comfort but not the additional speed. Additional speed may be obtained by using the steno machine paradigm and by doubling the number of keys in a Chordite fashion. You may even place a row of keys above the hand and use your extensor muscles to press them up.

      Alphagrip made a good job excluding a hunt-and peck and dedicating keys to fingers but it IMHO still requires quite precise movements (pressing up and down with index fingers).

      Of course, there is a retraining process. I can afford it since the hunt and peck method used in usual keyboards is both highly inefficient and unavoidable. You may keep your hands over F and J on a mini keyboard like typewriter or Happy Hacking Keyboard but the more keys and mice the worse.

    40. Re:How Fast? by erlenic · · Score: 1

      He basically used the index and middle finger, and occasionally (maybe once a minute) used his ring fingers. and he didn't just glance at the keyboard, he stared at it.

    41. Re:How Fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But most of the typing I do is creative, and then I have no trouble going long stretches at high speeds.

      Touch typing is better there too. You can watch what you type or stare out the window while you type. Having your eyes free isn't just it. It also frees up the part of your brain that you use to understand what your eyes are looking at.

      It's not hard to switch from hunt and peck to touch typing. You just have to tolerate being slower for a month or two. It's worth it.

    42. Re:How Fast? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      gtypist ( at least 2.7) displays wpm by default.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. Karma Whoring by T.Hobbes · · Score: 0

    Here's a preemptive posting of the press release in case they're slashdotted...

    Hello Potential AlphaGrip Customer,

    After over seven years of research and development, we have one of the world's largest keyboard companies, Sejin, ready to begin manufacturing our fifth generation AlphaGrip, the AG-5. Our final hurdle to launching our first product is to give Sejin a minimum order for 5,000 units. Sejin has built us great looking prototypes and we are confidant they will produce high quality AlphaGrips. The keys have a nice feel and work well. It took me about a month to reach an average typing speed of 50 wpm. Our ultimate goal is to enable AlphaGrip users to type as fast as they can think, from any location, in any position.

    In order to get our first product out the door for under $100, we kept the bells and whistles down to a minimum, though we did include an expansion slot to make it relatively easy and inexpensive to add functionality in the future -- we plan to develop adapters that will plug into this expansion slot for a handheld computer, smart phone, TV remote control, or for wireless connectivity.

    But, today we are bootstrapping to get a basic AlphaGrip to market. So, our first product is "simply" a handheld keyboard and mouse that looks like a sleek, futuristic game controller. When you connect the AG-5 to a PC running Windows, it automatically recognizes the AG-5 as a standard USB keyboard and mouse. The AG-5 comes with a detachable USB cable and a desk stand. It's great for typing while leaning away from your desk or when typing on a computer located somewhere other than an office (next to your TV or at the foot of your bed, for example). It's also ideal for typing on a laptop or notebook computer in any location and it's well-suited for video gaming.

    I truly enjoy working on the computer while leaning back in my chair with the AG-5 in my lap. I also prefer to use the AlphaGrip on my laptop. The "mouse" is a mini-joystick that is not as fast or as sensitive as a traditional mouse, but it is still very functional and more comfortable to use.

    We are not asking you to pay anything up front. We just need you to go to our electronic store and authorize us to send you an AG-5 and charge your credit card for $99 when we ship. You will not be charged anything until an AG-5 is on its way to you. Please consider buying a few as presents - you can be sure your friends and relatives won't already have one. And, if you know anyone who might be interested in purchasing an AG-5, please send them our way. The sooner we can give our manufacturer the minimum order, the sooner we can get you an AG-5.

    AlphaGrip has the potential to become the dominant input technology for desk-free computing. It represents a 300-500% increase in text-entry speed relative to a pen stylus with handwriting recognition or a thumb keyboard, and it's much more comfortable than balancing a keyboard on your lap. With an AlphaGrip "anywhere computing" is a reality, not just a slogan. As an original AlphaGripper, you may very well be making history.

    Thanks in advance for your support.

    Michael Willner, President
    AlphaGrip, Inc.

  4. If it really can... by Zorak+Man · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if you can really get the advertized 50wpm, this would be a great for a latop. I hate these damn compact keyboards and touchpads. It would be alot eaiser then carrying around a real keyboard, and it has a mouse joystick to boot.

    --

    404 .sig not found
    1. Re:If it really can... by JVert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think we are stil SOL.

      I bet you dont like mini laptop keyboards because you have big hands. Doesn't sound like they cater to us "big handers".

      Would be nice, maybe they will make a bigger model cause I got a tablet PC screaming for a mobile keyboard.

    2. Re:If it really can... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      My biggest disappointment with the 17" powerbook is that they used a dinky little keyboard with huge spaces on either side. WTF? They could have fit an almost-full-sized (less the numberpad) on there!

      That was the one thing that kept me from taking my big hands and running out there to buy one the day they came out.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:If it really can... by JVert · · Score: 1

      Hah! I renember that, I was storming the office asking everyone how it could make sense. The mac guys showed me their keyboards and said "its the exact same size without the keypad".

    4. Re:If it really can... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      and touchpads

      You mean the finger-wagger? At least that's what I feel like I am doing when I use the damn thing so that's what I call it. My laptop has an eraser style track-point too.

      The manufacturer was kind enough to build in two pointing devices into this model and I really don't like either style.

      For a while, I just carried a USB mouse, later switched to Bluetooth because I could get such a module that fits into my laptop.

    5. Re:If it really can... by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1
      I haven't measured mine but it feels full sized to me. If not, it's close enough that I don't notice. I switch keyboards from machine to machine all the time.

      Maybe I'm just used to a slight variance, then. Hm.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    6. Re:If it really can... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just used to a slight variance, then. Hm.

      Maybe thats my problem. After a decade of using a particular style of PC keyboard (short enter key, wide backspace, backslash above enter key), typing on anything else is difficult.

      In fact, even though I haven't used a commodore 64 in 5 years or so now, I can still remember some of the keyboard layout (shift-2 is "). I came across this layout on a Japanese iMac keyboard a couple of years back and was amused by it.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    7. Re:If it really can... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Key spacing and throw on my 12" Powerbook are indistinguishable from other keyboards I use. The keyboard is quiet, responsive, and feels good under my fingers.

      And I have big fuckin' hands.

      Me, I wouldn't like having my shoulders centered on the left 2/3 of the monitor. That's what would be required to put in a numeric keypad.

      Get a USB or Bluetooth keypad. They're not expensive.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:If it really can... by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      tablet PC screaming for a mobile keyboard

      I hope you like wires...

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    9. Re:If it really can... by agentforsythe · · Score: 1

      shift-2 is "
      I'm British, you insensitive clod! Shift-2 is always "
      It always annoys me when I do an OS install, and the keyboard is mapped to the US standard by default, and I don't notice until I go to use quotes, or type an @ in an email address.

    10. Re:If it really can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an eraser, it is technically known as a nipple.

    11. Re:If it really can... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      That large enter key and normal size backspace key came from the XT keyboard, but people didn't like it so IBM went back to the AT keyboard (which was not their original design btw)

      I don't think apple has ever used the XT keyboard layout, but it does seem to be more and more common amongst PC keyboards which pisses me off.

      Interestingly, MS never uses it with their Natural keyboards.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  5. What in the name of all that is holy.... by felonious · · Score: 4, Funny

    How can I type on something that is shaped like a tooth? Looks like the N-Gage engineers have worked their magic once again!

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
    1. Re:What in the name of all that is holy.... by bri_n33 · · Score: 1

      How can I type on something that is shaped like a tooth?

      Personally, i'm waiting for one that is shaped like a breast.

    2. Re:What in the name of all that is holy.... by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you missed it. It was called the Write-Hander back in the 80's. I forget who made it. I do remember it came in both kit and assembled versions.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    3. Re:What in the name of all that is holy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --
      Facists for Bush!

    4. Re:What in the name of all that is holy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you type on something that is vapourware?

      If this is a commercial product why aren't they investing in 5,000 units themselves? If they're taking no risk, I presume they expect no profit?

      I mean, did any of these "yeah we'll make them if we've already sold 5,000 on pre-order" things actually ever make it to sale?

    5. Re:What in the name of all that is holy.... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      get a british policemans helmet and an old keyboard.

      stick the inside of the keyboard inside the helmet, stick the keys to the outside, drill holes to connect the keys to the guts. leave the nipple at the top of the helmet bare, or paint it an amusing colour.

    6. Re:What in the name of all that is holy.... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Hey, look! I'm tooth-typin'!

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:What in the name of all that is holy.... by blazin · · Score: 1

      Obviously it wasn't designed by N-Gage engineers. If it were, you'd have to type with the side of you face.

  6. Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    - a great design
    - very clever shortcuts
    - decent to great keying speed after training
    - a real potential to help people with RSI
    - a manual to teach the user to "key fast in less than xxx weeks without effort"
    - an absolutely insane retail price
    - zero chance to make any sort of dent in the entrenched PC-104-type keyboard market

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "zero chance to make any sort of dent in the entrenched PC-104-type keyboard market"

      Why?

      Because most people are not touch typists. They want to see the keys their are hitting.
      Most people don't want to learn a new layout and then become flustered when they attempt to use their computer at work/home/friends house or whatever.
      Most people end up needing to press weird control sequences of their favorite program and unless the keyboard is very carefully designed these types of two and three letter combos are harder on fancy keyboards.
      Most people have no real desire to pay over a hundred for any keyboard no matter how revolutionary.
      Most people have occation to type one handed. Whether it's because you have a phone in your hand, or otherwise :).

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Because even the special $99 price is still too much?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1
      Interestingly enough, if you look closely at the images your fingers would rest quite closely to where they should (i.e. the 'right' letters) when using a QWERTY layout. I don't recall seeing this in previous alternative keyboards.

      Then again your remark about the price pretty much summarizes my decision not to try it out :)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised.
    4. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1

      Sorry... Just realized the page mentions a 70% correlation between QWERTY and their layout. And I felt so good because I figured it out by looking at the pictures :(

      --
      The revolution will not be televised.
    5. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by halowolf · · Score: 1
      For someone to make a dent I think it might be better if there were some transitional technologies to move people gently along in the right direction rather than just doing a full rework and have people reject it outright because it looks like a tooth :)

      Say, we first rework the PC-104-type keyboard into something that is more efficient to use. I don't mean something like this Microsoft Elite Keyboard but a keyboard that re-aranges the keys into a layout that is physically quicker to type with and makes more sense. Not the QWERTY combination that was designed for typewriters to slow the typist down. And then move on to less traditional devices that may gain more acceptance once the QWERTY stranglehold has been broken.

    6. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by scrod · · Score: 1

      99 USD doesn't sound that insane to me. I'm definitely considering pre-ordering one!

    7. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I think you hit it with #1..

      Most users have no clue where their keys are. They hunt and peck.

      Most of us are used to what we use. The first time I got on a Microsoft Ergonomic keyboard, the bottom row was (is) split in the wrong place for the way I type. I think it was the "B" key on the wrong side. I touch type, but aparently I don't do it in the absolutely correct Microsoft way. :)

      I was looking at alternative keyboards a while back. It would be nice to have one that's "better" than a QWERTY keyboard, but really, I'm not going to carry a keyboard around to every machine I work on and plug it in, nor am I going to buy a keyboard for my home, office, and laptop.

      If their product is so great, they should be bundling it with something else, and effectively giving them away to at least get into the market. People are resisitant to change, and won't just go spend $100 on the spiffy-keen new keyboard.

      It would be nice if they had more details on how it types. I didn't search the entire site, but I browsed around, and besides lots of PR fluff, I don't see something that says "This is where the letters are". Where's the [ctrl]-[alt]-[delete] chord? How do I [alt]-[f1] through [alt]-[f6]? And, how much does it weigh? After holding it for 8 hours, are my arms going to be tired? Probably.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Informative
      insane price ... Have you ever tried to get plastics made as an individual or small company? Got news for you, its *damned expensive*. I was trying to get a product made the size of a hockey puck, two pieces, not complicated. The mold costs alone were like $10,000.

      I bet the mold costs for that thing are like $100,000.

      If someone knows more about plastics then my amateur ass, please feel free to correct me.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    9. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Snoooore.... Snooore..


      99 USD doesn't sound that insane to me. I'm definitely considering pre-ordering one!


      Who... Wha.. huh? oh. Yay!!!!!! Yay!!!!! ...

      Snoooore.... Snooore..

    10. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Enucite · · Score: 1

      "...a keyboard that re-aranges the keys into a layout that is physically quicker to type with and makes more sense."

      Here you go:
      The Dvorak Keyboard

      And the best part? All current OS's support it, even if the physical keyboard is still QWERTY.

    11. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by antic · · Score: 1


      I think that a far better venture would've been a console controller specifically for FPS or RTS games. I can manage pretty well on my Xbox, but I'd be more accurate with a keyboard and mouse. Maybe there's something in between that doesn't look ridiculous, cost too much, and is portable enough to be easily carried around (carrying 2 Xboxes and 8 large controllers around ain't too light!).

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    12. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      They don't have to if the connector is USB.

      As a supplemental control system it should serve various niche uses well. Those niches being gaming, laptop, console game systems, and those of us who like to kick back w/o being tied to a laptop or PC via keyboard cable.

      Of course, it has to do all this w/o special drivers. Site is starting to slow down.

      I don't see it as a replacement, but as another peripheral input device.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    13. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by John+Courtland · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh, your last line (despite its intent ;) ) reminds me of when I was in highschool. As budding programmer, I was pretty damn quick on the keyboard, even one-handed (due to some combination of laziness and possibly *that*). In English class, we all were in the lab typing our papers. I think I was fooling around with Word Macros or some bolonga because I hated English class, so I was just screwing around with one hand on the keyboard and one hand holding my head at a slant. My teacher must not have noticed I was just zombied out, because on my report card, along with the D I so proudly earned, my teacher wrote that I needed to learn touch typing. Pfft. $100 says I could out-type her one-handed.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    14. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by AnotherFreakboy · · Score: 1

      I got good at one handed typing in highschool.

      Mainly by playing NetHack with the numerical keypad.

      --
      Why not get the real ultimate power?
    15. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by morphic_phoenix · · Score: 1
      I don't really care if it makes a dent in the market at all. If it delivers on it's promises, I can keep one at home, one at work, and it really won't matter who else has one. And for those occasions where I'll need to type on someone else's computer, well, this looks to be a different enough input sytle from a standard keyboard that learning this one won't unlearn qwerty like dvorak did for me.

      I don't care about claims of improved typing speed. But being more comfortable at my computer, and heck, mabye even less chance of carpal tunnel... I'll try one.

    16. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most people have occation to type one handed. Whether it's because you have a phone in your hand, or otherwise :).

      Mouse. You need to use the mouse.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    17. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      there is one that I enjoyed using, but it's hard to find.

      the twiddler Is a chording keyboard and in my heyday of using it I could type 50wpm on it while walking around and shopping with my GF at that time. (I was heavy into wearable computing, I coupled this with a xybernaut wearable)

      Problem is that it cost me $200.00 which is absolutely INSANE for a keyboard. this new "keyboard" also has that same doomed fate, it's price is unrealistic and the engineers/ management should have given up the second they found out that their cost was more than the retail price of a good PC-104.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I'd pay $99 for a mouse that could take care of that for me...

    19. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a touch typist, and tried in vain to get used to a slightly unorthodox keyboard--MS's "Natural Keyboard". Couldn't do it. I really wanted to, too, and tried for well over a month. I was forever hitting the wrong keys, and I finally gave up.

      I somehow doubt that this contraption will be any easier. But it does look like it'd be great for gaming.

    20. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      You've hit in on the nail right there. Most computer users were not professional taught how to type, so they use the two (or worse, one) fingered bent over the keyboard hunting for the correct key method. No wonder they get injured!

      I RTFA but I don't see how this new keyboard can be comfortable, as others have posted - it looks like a game controller and they hurt after a few hours of use.

      I've looked into alternatives, even tried a few. The MS Natural Keyboard left me in agony after a few hours (it was supposed to cut down on my carpal tunnel not add to it!!). Other so called ergonomic keyboards I've tried leave me in the same situation. One thing I'd like to try in the future is a stenotype, if only to learn a new skill.

      The best keyboard I ever used was on an Amstrad PCW (remember those!). I used to type 50+ letters a day on the thing, for a legal firm, at over 150WPM.

    21. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by harrkev · · Score: 1

      I have been looking at this for a couple of years. About a year ago, I chalked it off as vaporware. But now it is almost out, and they now have my credit card info.

      I hope that they actually make it. Part of me refuses to believe until I have a box in my hand.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    22. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

      I probably don't more more about plastics then you, but have you tried emachineshop.com?

    23. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The first time I got on a Microsoft Ergonomic keyboard, the bottom row was (is) split in the wrong place for the way I type. I think it was the "B" key on the wrong side. I touch type, but aparently I don't do it in the absolutely correct Microsoft way. :)

      Question: Is the '6' in the right place for you? The 'B' is fine for me (use my left hand), but I learned to touch-type with the 6 on my right.

      AFAIK, there is more than one way to touch type, unfortunately. I remember making an earlier attempt which (IIRC) had the B on the right hand (like you did).

      The main problem I have with keyboards such as the MS Natural, etc, is that the keys themselves don't feel any better than the cheap Mitsumi I normally use (which is pretty nice for a cheap-ass membrane job).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    24. Re:Like so many alternative keyboard, it will have by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      For some reason, I do really well with cheap keyboards. The computer store I worked in years ago sold Mitsumi keyboards, and they always worked well. Well, except for the fact that I learned to type on a mechanical typewritter, and would beat the shit out of the keys. The keyboards would survive for about a year. It wasn't really a big deal, we were selling them for $15/ea.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  7. Gorillas need not apply... by nzgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Those with large hands may not achieve the same typing speed as users with small to average sized hands.

    I guess this is the opposite of the giant XBox controller fiasco then?

    Seriously though, this would be great for a hacked XBox or PS2 Linux, but do they honestly think deskbound users will use it because "the AlphaGrip allows you to shift your body position frequently or even constantly without affecting your data input." I meam come on people, take a 5 minute break for gods' sake. Just get up and walk around or stretch. You don't need a $100 device to do it for you.

    1. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      Well, I do stretch and take breaks, but I might be interested in something like this. Occasionally I'll sit leaned way back in my chair whilst I type - the particular way my office is setup it's actually quite relaxing and I can get "in the zone" programming. But the keyboard prevents me from doing it for any length of time, this thing though, might let me lean back and relax for an hour or so

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    2. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by nzgeek · · Score: 1

      Hrrm true... but don't you just stick your keyboard in your lap for those hardcord coding sessions? I suppose you do get interrupted when leaning for the mouse all the time.

    3. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, usually that's what I end up doing. The mouse isn't much of a problem since I've memorized most of the ALT keys (And being in an IDE I don't need to TAB out much) but I'm a crappy touch typist. Keyboard laid flat, fingers in proper position and I'm ok. Put the keyboard in my lap and it's all out the window. Learning how to type on something like this might make it easier to really lean back and relax without hitting the backspace key 30% of the time hehe

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    4. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by JVert · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "I meam come on people, take a 5 minute break for gods' sake. Just get up and walk around or stretch. You don't need a $100 device to do it for you."

      Last time I replied to something as silly as this statement I was told to have a nice day. So i'm just gonna let it go. BTW you dont NEED a keyboard anyways, windows comes with an on screen keyboard.

    5. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guess this is the opposite of the giant XBox controller fiasco then?

      You know, I really liked the larger ( "Duke" ) controllers on the XBox. I know people with smaller / average hands had a hard time wrapping them, but for folks like myself with really long pteradactyl fingers they were actually comfortable for a change, as distinct to nearly every other console controller I'd played with.

      I wish the Dukes were still in stores ( they seem to have vanished from my local gaming haunts in favor of the Controller-S ) - as it stands, we have two Dukes and two Controller-S' at home, and that way everyone can find something reasonably comfortable.

    6. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but if you are a crappy touch typist, what makes you think you will be any good at this?

    7. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by mollyhackit · · Score: 1

      This is what I use with PS2 Linux http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=22&produ cts_id=2519& I can probably type 4 WPM on it; which is why I SSH in on my Zaurus since I can type on that keyboard twice as fast. Seriously though, I bought this controller for when I take my PS2 Linux kit to my friends house. I just need the keyboard to login and start X. Then I can use the analog stick as the mouse. All of the other buttons are programmed to control XMMS. I really need Linux running on a normal computer.

    8. Re:Gorillas need not apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it - its dweebs like Penny Arcaders that screwed all of us with large hands out of the only comfortable controller we're ever going to see.

      There aren't even any 3rd-party controllers in the original size/style of the Duke, and anytime I try an S-controller its RSI and cramp time after a quarter hour. I really don't get how anybody can use 'em - even my little kid brother prefers the Duke, and he ain't finished growing yet :)

  8. One handed keyboard+mouse still elusive... by mac+os+ken · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm still looking for a one handed keyboard+mouse+controller where I can type still type 60wpm and keep my other hand free to... umm... (barely audible) fast connection... (mumble) pr0n ftp...

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  9. Just in time for Doom 3! (and Cache/Mirror) by william_lorenz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The page is rather slashdotted right now, but I managed to get a glimpse. Looks like this thing is just in time for the Doom 3 mania, with more buttons than you can shake a boomstick at! Looks like quite the excellent Doom 3 controller to me, although an additional toggle joystick would help things more. And there's a Google cache right here. Finally, I also found this prototype design of what looks to be another model -- interesting stuff.

  10. I cant wait by ryane67 · · Score: 1

    to figure out how to hold it while moving your fingers around enough to get a fast typerate.

    Im betting we'll see HL2 before the pre-orders stack high enough for production on this thing.

    --
    ?SYNTAX ERROR IN LINE 42
    1. Re:I cant wait by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      I say that there's about a 50-50 chance that they'll have 5000 pre-orders by the time slashdot is finished with then.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  11. With Wireless adapter it can be great space saver by stroustrup · · Score: 1

    Provided we can quickly learn to use this thing, it will be a great space saver. I will buy one after checking it out at my local store when it gets there.

    --


    If you lost your job today, don't despair. You may die tomorrow anyway.
  12. Errr... by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems like it would be pretty nice if only I had three hands.

    1. Re:Errr... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      if only I had three hands.

      You have no idea how often I find an opportunity to say that...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Errr... by bunnyman · · Score: 0

      Also useful for Martian triple-breasted hookers!

  13. Discrimination, yet again.... by stox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Those with large hands may not achieve the same typing speed as users with small to average sized hands."

    Some of us have large hands. Will someone please build a keyboard for us!

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some of us have large hands. Will someone please build a keyboard for us!
      Or we will crush your puny heads! I'm crushing your head right now!

      --

    2. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sorry, the fingers you've used to dial are too fat. If you'd like to order a special dialing wand, please mash the keypad now."

    3. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while you're at it, build the damn Duke controllers for the XBox again!

      C'mon! We must be worthwhile as a market? There's got to be as many of us with larger than average hands as smaller than average right? (For adults anyway).

    4. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      Some of us have large hands. Will someone please build a keyboard for us!
      You can try a BigKeys keyboard but it might be larger than what you are looking for. A keyboard with just slightly larger keys would be great for people that have large hands.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    5. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you use the evil original Xbox controllers, too.

    6. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by ambrosine10 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use a Kinesis-Ergo keyboard. The contoured ones are great for people with big hands.

    7. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by mystereys · · Score: 1

      You know, when I saw the pictures, I thought just the opposite: how are people with small hands going to be able to reach all the buttons comfortably?

      --
      "Righteous speed demon and trust fund party darling of justice"
    8. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. I tried to use my boss' kinesis back when I worked for silicon engineering, he had one because emacs had given him carpal. Using that fucking thing is like sticking your hands in two finger bowls.

      I can not understand why no one has simply made a keyboard scaled up 25%. It might actually allow me to touch type. I want to get another 50WPM on my typing speed and I need to be able to use more fingers to do so.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I sure do, for everything but emulation. It turns out that since all the older consoles have itty bitty controllers, they ended up requiring button sequences that are difficult to manage on large controllers. I could perhaps solve the problem by remapping keys but I would rather have ABXY in reasonable locations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by Aragorn379 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?

      I tried one that a friend had. It has to be the *MOST* irritating keyboard I have ever tried. I have big fingers and found it almost impossible to type more than a word without hitting 2 keys instead of 1 on some letter or other.

    11. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Just imagine living in Soviet Russia where the Kinesis costs your yearly income, must be ordered abroad with bank and customs problem and, moreover, cannot be cloned by famous Soviet hackers due to curved PCB. I have no idea how to clone it except making a sculpted board from glass-filled car epoxy and mounting keys with discrete wires.

      And it does not do anything with kybd/mouse switching.

    12. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      My Microsoft (ugh - I know...) natural keyboard rox!

      I use one at home and one at work - and my capeltunnel is a dim memory now.

      I have no problems going between a standard 101 and a natural - although I can't stand being on a standard keyboard for any length of time.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    13. Re:Discrimination, yet again.... by ambrosine10 · · Score: 1

      That's because the keys are alinged perfectly vertically instead of diagonally. I did that at first too. It takes a while to get used to it but once you do you'll never want to go back.

  14. Sweet! by ShallowThroat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now i'll be able to blast my way through level 7 in Word XP!

    --
    The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
  15. Let's see how this flies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt this'll do much to make a dent in the consumer market, however, it'd be neat to get ahold of one of those. Just to compare speeds between my QWERTY keyboarding and the AlphaGrip keyboard. I just need moolah now...

  16. Emulators by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    I can see this as a viable way for players of emulators or other games with poor or non-existant joystick/gamepad support to use a game pad in their games, other than that it is just a Neat Toy (TM)

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:Emulators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are program on Windows (and I think you can actually do it at a low-level in Linux, and probably others) that will map joystick presses to a selected keyboard button. For free

  17. word-based typing again? by Yojimbo-San · · Score: 1

    Yet another word-based typing device? My sector of the target gadget-geek market, the ones who buy things just for the sake of it, don't type many words.

    We type commandline, perl, XML, stuff like that.

    My letter frequency counts for the stuff I need to do (i.e. not Slashdot) are way out of line with the letter frequency counts of "Standard English Text". Plus I use a whole load of punctuation, and some that just doesn't exist in that text.

    I've used an AgendA microwriter http://www.bellaire.demon.co.uk/cykey.htm and CyKey for many years now, on and off. Great for text. Sucks for coding.

    Mind you, it might be a good device for bloggers. They're not in my market segment :-)

    --
    Quick wafting zephyrs vex bold Jim
  18. oh the BLEAK FUTURE! by Linwood · · Score: 0, Funny
    i thought i was getting back at my high school teacher for those years of 'back straight! home keys!' by using my trusty 2 finger peck method.. now this companies vision is to not only make me use all my fingers but both my hands!

    LAZY KEYBOARDERS OF AMERICA UNITE!

    Join the IFPMKU today!

    (I Finger Pick My Keyboard Union)
  19. Tendonitis? by nzgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I look at the pictures of that thing, I can't help but wonder how you're meant to grip it and type at the same time.

    Similar to the problem I have with a mousewheel (I get a sore hand/finger from holding my finger above the wheel), I can imagine holding my fingers above the AlphaGrip's buttons while at the same time trying to grip the whole thing would be tendonitis city.

    Anyone actually seen one of these in use and can confirm this for me?

    1. Re:Tendonitis? by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      You have it upside down, the letters go on the bottom.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    2. Re:Tendonitis? by nzgeek · · Score: 1

      I meant 'hovering' your fingers above those bottom buttons. I imagine if you put enough pressure on them in order to grip the thing, then surely you'd be pressing the buttons constantly?

    3. Re:Tendonitis? by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Simple, double-sided tape. Since your keyboard and mouse are now one item, you shouldn't need to have your hands on anything else. The next version is promising to have a handy little nose scratcher attachement as well, so when your hands are effectively glued to this device, you can still scratch yourself. Scratching your crotch with a controller still isn't testing very well, except amongst a surprisingly high percentage of female testers...

    4. Re:Tendonitis? by scrod · · Score: 1
      I believe the white paper on their site resolves this issue:
      Unique grip allows the device to be held between the palms, freeing up the fingers for typing
    5. Re:Tendonitis? by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      You aren't supposd to grip it. Accourding the the features page, you hold it with your palms (I assume by pressing your hands inward toward each other) and your fingers always have freedom of movement.

      That would tax some unused muscles I'd imagine.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    6. Re:Tendonitis? by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scratching your crotch with a controller still isn't testing very well, except amongst a surprisingly high percentage of female testers.

      Woah, it has a rumble feature too?!

    7. Re:Tendonitis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The critical aspect to saving yourself from staining your wheel finger is to hold the device tightly within your arse checks giving you ample surface area to hit all the buttons. All this for 50 WPM. Coming down the pipe (voice recognition add-on).

    8. Re:Tendonitis? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      ...I get a sore hand/finger from holding my finger above the...

      You just confirmed yet another time that girlfriends are badly served by /.-ers.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    9. Re:Tendonitis? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I believe the idea with this, is to rest your fingers ON the buttons, and then press harder when you want to hit a key.

      With a mousewheel, try resting your fingers ON the mouse buttons, and then moving your finger to the wheel only when you need it. When you are doing a lot of scrolling, rest your finger gently on the mousewheel.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    10. Re:Tendonitis? by Bobbysmith007 · · Score: 1

      Its quite simple actually. You just apply inward pressure with your hands(palms) and manipulate its buttons with your fingers.

      I really need 5000 people to buy them so I can get mine and be horribly disappointed in it. I know, I know, your thinking, "I did that already with the power glove in like 1989." That however, is old and busted... This is new hotness. Obviously you must bow before my compelling logic. Please impulse buy this product like I did so that all of us who impulse buy it can actully get one. Besides it cant be that bad. Go watch the video. it plausibly looks like it would work nicely.

    11. Re:Tendonitis? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I can't help but wonder how you're meant to grip it and type at the same time."

      The same way you grip a GameCube controller: between your palms, as if you were holding up a bowl. When you relax your fingers they naturally hover over their corresponding buttons (or so I assume, having never held the device myself).

      At any rate, while I personally can't see working with one, I could see myself playing with one. "Work" is something done at a desk, in a desk chair, but for playing games I'd rather sit in my lounge chair, which isn't very desk-friendly.

      Now, as for the price point...

  20. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by JVert · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If I can type 50 wpm without taking my hands off the keyboard to get to the mouse i'd be very very happy.

  21. Fifth generation? by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Informative
    why can't I find any references to the previous generations/iterations anywhere?

    looked all over google- nothing listed anywhere...no images, no froogle, no weburls.. nada...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Fifth generation? by after · · Score: 1

      why can't I find any references to the previous generations/iterations anywhere?
      Yes.

    2. Re:Fifth generation? by yo303 · · Score: 4, Informative
      why can't I find any references to the previous generations/iterations anywhere?

      Because you didn't try a patent search?

      They have four patents (one design) dating back to 2001. The first was filed in 1998.

      yo.

    3. Re:Fifth generation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      supreme keyboard

    4. Re:Fifth generation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      god google is making people lazy google is not the sum of all human knowledge, searching google for 2-3 terms does not constitute "everywhere" maybe I'm just pissed because I see this every time another assignment is due and someone disputes their grade because I marked them down for missing something important to the topic and they give as their excuse "but that wasn't in the results from google"

    5. Re:Fifth generation? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      You know, the Phantom Gaming Console is on its second generation... ;^)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:Fifth generation? by Ghostgate · · Score: 1, Funny

      google is not the sum of all human knowledge

      You must be new here.

    7. Re:Fifth generation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn, where do you teach - a special school? Learn some grammar.

    8. Re:Fifth generation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lazy? Lazy like some kid who's too lazy use the shift key.

  22. System is busy by NIK282000 · · Score: 1

    Blue screen comes up and you cant ctrl-alt-del because its a USB device. Such a good idea with one fatal flaw, its compatible with windows.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    1. Re:System is busy by Scuff · · Score: 1

      there are tons of USB keyboards in use, and i'm fairly certain that ctrl + alt + del works just as well as it would on any other keyboard in Windows XP/2003

    2. Re:System is busy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, dude if your bios doesn't support USB Keyboards, then upgrade; and you should quit using 98. k-thx

    3. Re:System is busy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you have to do is enable legacy usb keyboard support in your bios. Then your bios makes the keyboard work with any os.

  23. interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds good..

  24. This solves my #1 gripe about gamepads... by sahonen · · Score: 1

    Not enough buttons! When going to a gamepad I always miss the flexibility that having 104 keys to bind gives me. If only it has dual analog sticks, though.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    1. Re:This solves my #1 gripe about gamepads... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      I would have liked to see a scroll wheel on it as well.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  25. Slideshow.. by IronMagnus · · Score: 1

    I guess they figure the combination of hot chicks and little boys in the slideshow on their main page apeals to most internet users...

  26. 50 WPM! by 1337+Twinkie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Up to 50 WPM!" Wow!

    With a standard keyboard, I can type 65+ and some people can go to 100+ WPM. And QWERTY was designed to slow people down!

    1. Re:50 WPM! by ChoyLeeFut · · Score: 3, Informative
      No kidding. Last week I did the test at the following link 3 times and consistently scored over 80 wpm (corrected):

      http://www.typingtest.com/

      So let me get this straight: I lay down a chunk of change to both look cool *and* type slower? Pft.

      --

      The postman hits! The postman hits! You have mail.

    2. Re:50 WPM! by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      QWERTY was more designed to minimize jamming (by keeping word-adjacent letters apart) then to slow the typist.

    3. Re:50 WPM! by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      They're not marketing this as a desktop keyboard replacement so the comparison is specious. It's being marketed as an input device for situations where a full keyboard is either unwieldy or impractical.

      The WPM comparison is to thumb input devices or stylus/writing recognition devices. If you can bang out 100 WPM on either of those I would be surprised.

    4. Re:50 WPM! by 1337+Twinkie · · Score: 1

      True, but I can bang out @least 30+ on a laptop keyboard (one of the smaller ones, 12" screen). For laptops, the point is almost mute anyway, since you still have the keyboard out. No way in heck is anyone going to hook it to a PDA or convertable Tablet PC. Maybe a straight tablet, but there's a reason they bought a really expensive computer with a stylus. WEB TV users, maybe; but then nobody should be hampered by typing speed while browsing the net.

      The only good application I can see for this device is as a game pad. I can so imagine playing HALO PC, Freelancer, or Doom and kicking so much arse not having to span the whole keyboard/mouse distance. Plus, this thing is probably way more comfortable than the keyboard/mouse

      So, in short:
      Desktop Typing - no
      Laptop typing - no
      Replacement for stylus - no
      Gaming - Heck yeah!

    5. Re:50 WPM! by prockcore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And QWERTY was designed to slow people down!

      No! QWERTY was designed to spread out the letters. Two letters close to each other typed at the same time could cause a jam, so they spread common letters out to reduce jamming.

      QWERTY was designed to speed people up.

    6. Re:50 WPM! by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      In fairness, they are talking about a 30 day timeframe. According to all the complaints I heard from those in typing classes, 50 WPM in 30 days on a typewriter QWERTY layout is an accomplishment.

      It is possible that after 60 days you may be to 65, and after a year you might be near 100WPM. I'd like to see longer use studies. They could send me one to try out, and I'd be happy to report my findings in a year. ;)

      Of course, whether they can actually get average joes to get 50WPM in 30 days is another matter.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    7. Re:50 WPM! by shird · · Score: 1

      A jam on a typewriter, as the heads must go forward hit the paper and then back, hitting two together could cause the hammers to jam.

      This is not the case for computer keyboards, but they retain the same layout. It was designed to stop typewriters from jamming, this doesnt mean its the best layout as far as speedy typing is concerned. Although the alternating left and right hands for 90% of words supposudly is a fast scheme and both the qwerty and dvorak layouts are pretty reasonable at doing this.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    8. Re:50 WPM! by ambrosine10 · · Score: 1

      You mean it was designed to prevent jamming, as you said. That's different from speeding people up. These days people have adapted to QWERTY well and can type fast with it, but it's far from the "best" layout, whether you optimize for speed or ergonomics. The Dvorak layout, for example, is optimized for ergonomics, not speed.

    9. Re:50 WPM! by ambrosine10 · · Score: 1

      I think that these sorts of keyboards are designed for people who have ergonomics in mind, not necessarily speed. If you're a speed demon you'll be fine with a regular keyboard. I use a Kinesis-Ergo contoured keyboard with the Dvorak layout. I don't type any faster than I did with QWERTY flat boards, but it's a lot more comfortable, and that's what matters to me.

    10. Re:50 WPM! by ninja0 · · Score: 1
      Really it was just designed to keep the typewriter from jamming... that means slowing down a lot of things and spreading letters out. It's absolutely untrue that QWERTY was designed to speed people up. Well, unless you count typewriter jamming time, in which case you're correct. It's unbalanced between the hands; I don't remember the exact numbers but the left hand does more typing than the right. Hey, you've got EARST all under your left fingers! And look at how many valid letter cominations are awkwardly typed with the same finger: ce, de, ju, fr, gr, ik, lo, un, hu, sw, etc. Also difficult to type is sa, as, and pl (consecutive weak fingers). Dvorak avoids all of those tricky things other than ik, and only adds "up" and "uy" (QWERTY it would be "fr" and "ft")

      I type on both QWERTY and Dvorak and I can honestly say it's worth the switch, provided that you can spare some weeks to practice and you don't have to use other people's QWERTY keyboards often. I went from ~60 to ~80 wpm, but the biggest difference is that the Dvorak keyboard is way less fatiguing. You don't need to have RSI to appreciate comfortable keystrokes. The home row is aoeuidhtns, so your fingers don't have to move much.

      --
      --If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.
    11. Re:50 WPM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No no no! It's all myth -- there's no actual evidence about why it's laid out that way. There's the "salesman can type the word typewriter along the top row of the keyboard" there's that vowels are stretched out over the keyboard to slow people down, there's that Dvorak is faster so Qwerty must have been designed slower, there's a million theories but no proof.

      So as there's no proof don't act like anyone knows, that is, unless you have evidence (straightdope and snopes don't even pretend to know)

    12. Re:50 WPM! by silverz · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but at least I can type "qwerty" faster on QWERTY.

    13. Re:50 WPM! by mjfrazer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You won't look cool. You will look apparently look like this

    14. Re:50 WPM! by ChoyLeeFut · · Score: 1
      It's being marketed as an input device for situations where a full keyboard is either unwieldy or impractical.

      Let's take that and run with it. From their site:

      Its handheld design enables powerful desk-free computing from any location in any position: leaning away from your desk, standing up, riding in a vehicle, relaxing on a sofa in your living room, sitting on the floor, leaning back in a recliner, or even lying in bed.

      So, one point at a time:

      - leaning away from your desk

      Keyboard placed on lap

      - standing up

      One point for the Alphagrip. Even so, I can't see doing this for more than an hour. That's about how long I would last before lower back pain would set in.

      - riding in a vehicle

      Laptop placed on lap -- did I mention 85 wpm? That was done on a laptop. And unless the driver is off-roading, I don't expect a significant drop in that speed.

      - relaxing on a sofa in your living room

      Unless I'm the type of person to pull a computer desk up to a sofa, or who has a PC hooked up to a very very large home entertainment centre screen (I'm neither), this is an unlikely scenario. Even if you replace "sofa" with "big overstuffed chair".

      - sitting on the floor

      Been there, done that. Both with a laptop and a keyboard/PC. For hours on end. For months.

      - leaning back in a recliner

      I actually used to work like this at my first sysadmin job. Chair tilted back, keyboard on lap, fingers flying over the keyboard. Found it very comfy.

      Something just occurred to me. With the Alphagrip, you'll need to support it, compared to a keyboard, where it (or the desktop, or your lap) supports you. I can't imagine that supporting the Alphagrip for any length of time would be anything but fatiguing.

      Anyway, enjoy your specious -- I mean, deceptively attractive -- Alphagrip.

      --

      The postman hits! The postman hits! You have mail.

    15. Re:50 WPM! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      You will look apparently look like this

      Aargh! That photo looks *exactly* like it came out of the "Future Publishing circa early-90s" school of magazine photography.

      (British readers who read ST Format, Amiga Format or anything similar will probably get this. 16-year old Yanks won't).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  27. Crazy by camzacid · · Score: 0, Troll

    all i an say is WTF were they somkin when they came up with this

  28. Bah. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The makers of these keyboard replacements always act like learning an entirely new style of typing is so easy that we should be ashamed for even thinking for a moment that it'll be hard.

    In reality, most of us have spent years and years learning to type on a standard keyboard. It's a specialized skill.

    Moreover, as it DOES look like an X-Box controller, and as I know how ten hours of marathon gaming can kill my hands, I wonder how they can really be sure it's MORE comfortable. I mean, my keyboard may have little to reccomend it, but, worse comes to worse, I CAN type on it without having to grip anything (Mmmmm Carpal), which would be impossible with their keyboard.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Bah. by iocat · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about a real keyboard is I can easily move my hands away. If I need to keep a few fingers curled for maximum typing speed, I can let my other fingers hang loose. This device looks like I'll need to actively grip with all my fingers. That might not be fun.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    2. Re:Bah. by Zitchas · · Score: 1

      I like the looks of it. I could see problems with my wrists/arms getting tired after a while, but aside from that it looks good. Sound theory, anyway. And to those who laugh at the 50 wpm figure, that's after about a month of playing with it. Sure, lots of us have wpms in the 70+, many (myself included) in the 100+ wpm. But how long have we been tying to get to these speeds? Probably a lot longer than a month... Using such a device, provided my wrists/arms don't die from holding it up, I could see most of us reaching speeds well above whatever we do currently. And I wouldn't mind learning a new keyboard layout. I can alternate fairly well between QWERTY and DVORAK. What's a third?

      --
      Z
    3. Re:Bah. by tsarin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      as I know how ten hours of marathon gaming can kill my hands
      During normal typing, your hands -- hell, your entire body -- are nowhere near as tense as during marathon or any other gaming. When I bother firing up a game on my peecee (I haven't a console, so I can't make any comparisons there), I'm leaning forward, I'm tense, I'm on edge waiting for the next baddy; I have to get him before he gets me, after all. When I'm typing, though, I'm leaning back, I'm chill, I'm kickin' it. I expect there'd be much the same difference between using this device and a control pad/joystick/whatever.

      From the looks of it, your wrists would be positioned much more naturally than they are using a flat keyboard. Having to rotate your wrists to type is a major component of RSI. Much more so, to my knowledge, than gripping something. (I may be wrong there; my RSI affects the cubital, not carpal tunnel.) I already have a trackball so my wrist is stationary when mousing. I imagine this device would offer much the same sort of benefit. And with it, I wouldn't even have to switch back and forth between mouse and keyboard. Better off all around, I'd think.

      After a period of adjustment, of course (which would probably involve throwing it across the room in frustration a time or three...).

    4. Re:Bah. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...and as I know how ten hours of marathon gaming can kill my hands...

      Skim over that sentence quickly and see what you get...

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    5. Re:Bah. by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Well, to try and contradict you a little... try and play Zelda: The Wind Waker and battle the swordsman on the first island (I've forgotten all the names). I just had to hit him 500 times without taking 3 hits from him. It's actually really easy--no anticipation, no adreneline, no leaning forward (laying on a bed), very little dodging--but it takes forever and a tonne of button presses. In the last 100 hits my hand was starting to hurt. The problem isn't that I had played all day (which I had), but rather that combat involves more buttons and this is one of the longest battles in the game.

      The main problem is sweat on the controller and how tight you have to grip it during combat.. plus it's a little unnatural to have your index fingers so far away from the rest of the fingers I suppose.

      Granted, maybe it's poorly designed compared to the XBox controller... I dunno. The button layout might be better on the 3D keyboard too.

    6. Re:Bah. by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      Read the linked features page. It is "gripped" between the palms of the two hands, not like you grab your ... joystick.

      If the game controllers were like that long term console gaming would be far less painful.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    7. Re:Bah. by kahei · · Score: 1


      Well, learning a new style of typing needn't be hard -- it depends which aspects you have to relearn.

      For instance, I found that learning to type on a kinesis contour took only about 3 days, and that's with moving the shift keys around and using an extra layer for programming punctuation. Big win!

      I also found that learning to type Dvorak on that same keyboard was about 3 months of utter misery, delivering no clear benefits and permanently confusing my muscle memory as to which key is on which finger.

      I think the hardest change to make is to associate a letter with a new finger. Doesn't matter if it's a new movement, provided it's on the same finger. The designers of this tooth thing seem to agree.

      As to whether the tooth thing is more comfortable -- it looks to me as if it takes constant pressure inward from the palms to prevent it from dropping to the floor. If that's the case, it sounds _horrible_. To be honest, I'd only see the point if it could be used one handed -- otherwise, how is holding a big black tooth any easier than resting a big beige plank?

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    8. Re:Bah. by phliar · · Score: 1
      During normal typing, your hands -- hell, your entire body -- are nowhere near as tense as during marathon or any other gaming. When I bother firing up a game on my peecee, I'm leaning forward, I'm tense, I'm on edge waiting for the next baddy; I have to get him before he gets me, after all.
      You need to learn to relax; you'll get much better. Talk to flight instructors or music teachers (probably others, those are just areas I know) -- getting students to relax is one of the biggest obstacles. For myself, both when learning to fly and learning to play trumpet, once I learned to relax it was like suddenly I wasn't in mud anymore. When you're tense, your muscles are working against each other. This may be good for those isometric body-building exercises, but not for anything else. Learn to relax and the body disappears, freeing up your brain to think and anticipate while simultaneously increasing your endurance.
      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  29. Gaming? by CoreyGH · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I can't say that this looks like it can take the place of a keyboard/mouse combo; at least, not for FPS games. It looks like it'll behave much like a console controler.


    This may be off topic but I ache for the day someone will make a crossplatform (console/computer) FPS so that I can finally prove to my disbeleiving pals (and myself) that a good computer FPS player will always dominate a great console FPS player (each using their respective platforms). Sure you could hook up a gamepad to a computer and just play PC halo but then the console guys always fall back to "it doesn't have the same feel as an Xbox."

    1. Re:Gaming? by JVert · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a keyboard and a mouse plugged into a console be enough proof?

    2. Re:Gaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, with the Quake 3 port for DreamCast, PC and DreamCast players could all connect to the same servers, as long as the PC players were at a certain patch level (couldn't upgrade or else you couldn't connect to DC servers). Only drawback was that all the DC servers only supported a max of 4 players, but it was fun beating on the console players. ;)

    3. Re:Gaming? by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but only if console games would support them. I'm aware of zero console games that support mouse input for control of the targeting reticle.

    4. Re:Gaming? by JVert · · Score: 1

      W
      T
      F

      I cant belive this is true, I mean no, I belive YOU. Thats just, beyond stupid. I bought my console with the assumption in mind if I really wanted to get serious with gaming I could plug in a mouse. this is... uncool.

    5. Re:Gaming? by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      the poor neglected dreamcast in the corner would like to have a few words with you.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    6. Re:Gaming? by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      Sure you can HOOK a mouse up to it, heck they made a mouse for the SNES. But does Quake 3 support the mouse on the Dreamcast for aiming?

  30. Call me crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I've had a 3D keyboard for YEARS. Now, 1D, 2D or even 4D would be impressive.. But just 3D?? bah......

  31. How do you figure? by sm.arson · · Score: 1

    Have you actually played Doom 3? Yes, there are separate keys for each of the (different?) weapons, and the flashlight, but from what I've played, Doom 3 has a much simpler control system than games like Unreal and Battlefield. They certainly succeded in making a simple, old-school shooter.

    For Doom 3 the only buttons I use (other than the arrow keys and mouse) are (F)lashlight and (R)eload.

    --
    for great justice, this sig has been moved
  32. The good thing about 104-type keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The good thing about the standard keyboards: you can type one-handed or even one-fingered. 50wpm is fine, but I could care less. I want a keyboard that lets me do my work while I'm drinking coffee and eating my donut. With these other keyboards, I must use both hands. Worse, this one makes me use the mouse with my right hand only, sometimes I like to switch to my left hand, to relieve some stress.

  33. Im' uisng one rghit now. by antikarma · · Score: 5, Funny

    Iv'e been uisng a prtoypote of tihs for a wilhe now. I lkie it a lot. I can tpye sxity wrods a mintue wtih aobut one precnte acucrcay. Im' tihknnig aobut getitng rid of my QEWTRY kyebarod atlogehter.

    1. Re:Im' uisng one rghit now. by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

      I'm so used to poorly written crap on the internet that I didn't get the joke until I saw "QEWTRY" :-)

      Reminds me of this: http://stage.itp.nyu.edu/~jn429/cambscramb/
      (just with better grammar) ::Cue a joke about how this post has a spelling or grammar mistake::

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
  34. I think.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it looks like a pair of saggy tribal boobs.

    1. Re:I think.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't really make a judgement on the validity of that statement without seeing some evidence - could you post some links to pictures to back up your claim?

  35. weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i type over 120.. why downgrade

  36. WPM? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    The keyboard looks spiffy, but that 50WPM isn't impressive. I already type at over 100.. Well, as fast as I think. :) If I have to stop and think about something, I stop typing. I wonder what my WPM could be on this. I blame my typing speed on years of playing the piano and sax. Oh ya, and writing on FidoNet. :)

    Is FidoNet even still alive?

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  37. get a foot mouse by ylikone · · Score: 1
    If I had the cash (yikes, $300!!!), I would get this...

    footmouse.com

    I believe using the feet to mouse around while typing with ones hands is the ultimate solution.

    --
    Meh.
  38. Ideas for generation 6 by JVert · · Score: 1

    1.Replace that joystick with a trackball. Maybe keep the joystick if you can fit it, dont fret if you dont.

    2.Make a big version, if your going for a niche market, go for the niche consumer.

    3.Get the hell off your high horse. Yea $100 sounds reasonable if you have seen the device in person, felt it, and felt confident you could control it. Frankly I would still wait 3 months for something so new and read alot of reviews. You expect me to spend $100 on a new joystick without even feeling it?

    1. Re:Ideas for generation 6 by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      1) Trackball you have to keep petting the damn thing, unless you have it super sensitive in which case you lose accuracy. For a solution designed to minimize hand movement making the user pet constantly vs. using an analog stick would be against the entire design philosophy.

      2,3) I'm sorry, but 100$ is a mind numbingly cheap price for a low volume device for this. Let's look at some similar products. A close competitor is the DataHand which sells for 10 times that. A gesture keyboard goes for 340$. A chording keyboard/mouse replacement that's been out for many years and used by wearable people, the twiddler, is 220$. Just a half-keyboard with extra letter mappings to make up for it is 295$. All these companies aren't so expensive because they want to be, manufacturing low volume stuff like this is hideously expensive. You say you want a second version for large hands, that would raise the price even more.

  39. What about coding? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

    Does anyone think it would be good for coding?

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    1. Re:What about coding? by JVert · · Score: 1

      I think its possible, brackets being placed where they are right now its not very user friendly. Might even make it easier to keep variable names short.

  40. Joystick? by authenticgeek · · Score: 1

    Do other people see joysticks as an actual alternative to a mouse?
    I haven't spent any time getting used to something like that but I imagine some people have. I can point the cursor from one side of my screen to the other with a flick of my wrist and that kind of speed makes me dislike slower (at least initially) forms of movement, like a joystick. The question is if I hold the joystick slightly off-center, will it keep moving in that direction or stop slightly off center of the screen? Traditionally, I'm used to seeing the former but has anyone used a joystick with the latter form of movement?

    1. Re:Joystick? by JVert · · Score: 1

      If you want to experiment go get a small trackball, superglue a joystick on it and turn the sensitivity up. You'll need to have another mouse hand to "align" it.

  41. Aren't all keyboards 3D? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    Really?

    1. Re:Aren't all keyboards 3D? by rocketjesus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not all of them.

      The Atari 400 keyboard was perfectly flat, and purely two dimensional.

      The reason that computer wasn't successful was because if the keyboard somehow became disconnected from the computer and turned sideways, you couldn't find it. Total pain in the ass. That's why keyboards nowadays have a third dimension to them.

  42. no demonstration? by picketfences · · Score: 1

    I didn't see any demonstration of their qwerty keyboard!. If they are trying to sell this "revolutionary" gadget they should atleast put a video demonstration on their site.

    It's also ironic that this page(http://alphagrip.com/why.html), which says their technology is for 21st century, looks like something that was made in 1990.

  43. Yeah but by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    How are we supposed to use this with one hand?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  44. not to troll, but... by sinnfeiner1916 · · Score: 0

    this has got to be the stupidest shit i have ever seen on slashdot since john katz (i'm a serial acount-maker). i don't think i'd ever be able to work it, and i'm not sure that anyone else would (well, maybe some, but not many).

    --
    The More Laws, the less Justice --Marcus Tullius Cicero
  45. Yeah... by superdan2k · · Score: 1

    ...and normally upon seeing some lame attempt at a keyboard replacement, such as this, I'd ask, "Gee, pre-orders? How much is shipping to Fantasyland?"

    But then I realized, shipping would cost a dime, because they're already in Fantasyland.

    --
    blog |
  46. QWERTY - not for slowing typists down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The claim that QWERTY was designed to slow typists down to avoid jamming typewriters is misleading.

    What the QWERTY system tries to maximize is alternating keystrokes with the left hand and the right hand - most common words alternate between right and left hands when typing. This stopped most jamming because jams most frequently occured when there were repetitive keystrokes on one side/one row/one column of the typewriter's keys.

    This actually increased typing speed - many people are capable of speeds in great excess of 50 wpm. Also, though a lot of people hunt and peck, almost everyone who uses a computer in their job (whether it be a programmer or not) does touchtype, from sheer necessity. The amount of time it would take a slow typist to learn how to type 50 wpm on this device could easily be spent increasing their current typing speed to well over that on a regular keyboard.

    1. Re:QWERTY - not for slowing typists down by Eric604 · · Score: 1
      What the QWERTY system tries to maximize is alternating keystrokes with the left hand and the right hand

      dvorak layout is much better at this.

    2. Re:QWERTY - not for slowing typists down by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2, Informative

      most common words alternate between right and left hands when typing.

      And it actually makes a barrier for hi-speed typing - due to differential delays in neural system the text becomes nonerdabael, oops, nonreadable. There is about 6 msec delay when thoughts move between the hemispheres. Look for steno machines in order to avoid it.
  47. Cool view by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hmm. The keyboard is cool, but I was more thrilled at enjoying the green. If that cool view is his backyard, I don't think he needs to sell this stuff for a living. Or, maybe he does. That grass withg the lake is really cool. Then again, maybe he filmed this in a national park.

  48. What is the 104 keys bullcrap? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

    104 keys? The only true keyboad doesn't have 104 keys, it has 101.

    It's the IBM Model M keyboad that doubles as a self defense weapon. Mine was made in 1986/09/06 and still works great.

    Never speak of this 104 key bs again.

    1. Re:What is the 104 keys bullcrap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you my model M who's date of mfg has long since come off can easily take on and crush your model M keyboard in any battle.

    2. Re:What is the 104 keys bullcrap? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      You've never encountered the 84-key Model F that shipped with the PC and AT have you? I love the PS/2 keyboard as much as the next guy (using one right now, but only because I gave it to my grandma after got my M13 and I'm chilling at her place) but with it's comparatively flimsy plastic casing and lack of pointy, spring loaded dials to retract and extend the footies on the back, the M has nowhere near the weaponry potential of the F.

  49. Surely it must be good... by wviperw · · Score: 1

    ...it helps you pick up chics. (as evidenced by all the hot chicas using it on their front page)

    --
    Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
  50. sorry.... NO by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Arrow keys and mouse are the ONLY way to really play a first person shooter. Playing with only buttons or a joystick is difficult... you simply can't get the super-quick turns and targetting that a mouse provides!

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:sorry.... NO by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      Arrow keys are so wolfenstein. Everybody who's anybody uses edsf or wsad for moving/strafing. Duh. Seriously though, tell me you didn't mean the arrow keys.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    2. Re:sorry.... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sh*t! All this time I have been using edwr!

    3. Re:sorry.... NO by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you forget the lefties out there, eh?

      For us southpaws its all about arrowkeys, ctrl numpad-ins, del, end, such...

      Now... If only some egghead would start selling a decent left-handed trackball with a wheel... Cheaply...

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    4. Re:sorry.... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about arrow keys. I always lose my bearings on the WASD layout and end up hitting X, E, F, Alt or Space or something silly at the most critical moments. You just need to shift your keyboard to the left a bit, and it works. You even get easy access to al the right-side keys, like Backspace, slash, Enter, Shift and Ctrl, which are always nice to bind to useful things like run, crouch, use, drop, reload, etc, for super-quick access.

    5. Re:sorry.... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, my specific problem is not hitting the wrong keys by accident, but in what they usually end up having my guy do. With WASD you also have to bind all the surrounding keys to do usefull stuff, it's all too easy to do wasteful and inconvinient things by accident. With the arrow pad/right-side buttons split, it's impossible to do anything by accident. So that's the rationale for not using WASD.

    6. Re:sorry.... NO by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      That's why I use edsf, the F key has that ridge on it.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    7. Re:sorry.... NO by ylikone · · Score: 1

      by arrow keys I meant a,s,w,d obviously. I would never be using the "actual" arrow keys.

      --
      Meh.
  51. Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, why the site is so slow?...

  52. Using other people's keyboards by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    I had a hard enough time when I used to type on an "ergonomic" keyboard - not in the typing, which was great, but when it came to moving across the office and keying stuff in on random people's keyboards. Although it did keep 'em off mine for the most part. Still, these days I just use conventional (even laptop most of the time) keyboards and keep my wrists angled - using a curve rather than a strict home-row approach. Works fine.

    But that's the point. Just like Norton Desktop, weird keyboards may or may not be better. Heck, my ideal would be a "natural" keyboard folded in two so that I could keep my wrists upright instead of bent over at all. But I don't want to lose the ability to type well on arbitrary keyboards either - something that's often underrated by the users' (or at least sellers) of replacement keyboards/mice/desktops/etc.

    Just like a car. Sure, with drive-by-wire you could remap all the controls, but there's a certain comfort, safety and familiarity in using the standard pattern, no matter how "good" or "bad" it is.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:Using other people's keyboards by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      But that's an advantage that I don't see being mentioned here for this thing - it seems quite portable (unlike most ergonomic keyboards and even most chord-based systems)... what's more, one would hope that, like USB 'mass storage' devices, one could just plug and play with this thing on other people's machines (maybe?...)

  53. Why would touch typists switch? by msblack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I already type over 50wpm on a QWERTY keyboard. Why would I want to switch? My desk is already equipped with an under-surface keyboard try to prevent RSI problems. For /. readers and techies, the best keyboard change would be returning the CONTROL key where it belongs: next to the A key. How many people use the CAPS LOCK key more than the CONTROL key? At least DEC got that right with the VT-100. I'm still using an old Keytronic keyboard because nobody manufactures keyboards with a DIP switch to swap the CAPS and CONTROL keys. It still drives people nuts when they use my keyboard.

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
    1. Re:Why would touch typists switch? by oshy · · Score: 1

      Theres probably some software out there that lets you swap keys over for whatever operating system you are using.

      I like customising things like that as it stops people buggering about with your system when your back is turned. I have my mouse set to the left side (right handed but can scribble and click at the same time) but I dont know why people swap the buttons when they do that.

  54. Yet another flop to be. by Gldm · · Score: 2, Informative

    This reminds me of the SpaceOrb. I tried one, hated it, and returned it. Why? It just didn't have the precision of a mouse or joystick.

    Likewise, I learned to type on a dvorak keyboard. I don't anymore. Why? Let's see.

    1. Finding a programmable keyboard can be expensive or irritating. Fortunately I found some old Gateway Anykeys that still worked for $10 each.

    2. Relearning to type. This took me about a month to get past 1/4 of my existing typing speed (30wpm vs 120wpm).

    3. Lack of portability. This was the real killer. It wasn't typing on MY keyboard that became irritating, it was typing on OTHER PEOPLE'S keyboards that did. Because I'd have to switch back over to qwerty again to do any work on any other system at a job or at a friend's house or for my parents etc.

    I did find my hands were much less tired, so I assume were I a chronic RSI sufferer, I'd consider putting up with the inconvenience. But short of hauling my own custom keyboard around, there's no solution to the pain of having to re-adapt every time you go somewhere else. Are people going to carry this thing with them and hook it up to friends/coworkers/bosses/clients computers to do work? I doubt it.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:Yet another flop to be. by ambrosine10 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I use a Kinesis-Ergo Advantage keyboard with a Dvorak layout and and I can still type fine on regular QWERTY flat boards. Sure, it's less comfortable, but the ease of use on my personal board is worth the price of learning different layouts.

    2. Re:Yet another flop to be. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      1. Dvorak is not tied to hardware. I have yet to find an operating system that cannot remap the keyboard to other layouts, including Dvorak. Use your $10 keyboard if you like, and possibly spend a few more dollars on keyboard stickers to relabel it.

      2. I hear it doesn't take most people that long to get back to full-speed. Your experience may just be atypical.

      3. With Windows, Mac, Unix, it's quite easy to (temporarily) remap the keyboard to Dvorak (or anything else for that matter). You could, alternatively, follow the suggestion below:

      Are people going to carry this thing with them and hook it up to friends/coworkers/bosses/clients computers to do work?

      Why not? It's a normal USB device, and more and more computers come with front USB ports. It would be as simple as plugging-it in the front. Don't even need to remove the current keyboard/mouse.

      I did find my hands were much less tired, so I assume were I a chronic RSI sufferer, I'd consider putting up with the inconvenience.

      "Tired" isn't the key word. The key word is "pain". I don't have RSI or any other medical problems, but hours of typing on a standard keyboard make your fingers, knuckles, and wrist feel very stiff, and it's slightly painful, even if you don't have any more serious conditions.

      Now that I have switched, I don't have that problem at all, and it only took a couple months before I was typing faster than I could before... There's a good reason why all typing-speed records are set with a Dvorak keyboard.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Yet another flop to be. by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      I type dvorak, and I switch to qwerty rather easily, thanks. The problem is not with my typing, but rather with my thinking lately. For some reason I am unable to think at greater than thirty words per minute qwerty or dvorak.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  55. 50 wpm? by djeaux · · Score: 1
    Like others on this thread, I touch type well above 50 wpm. Heck, I could approach 35 wpm with Graffiti 1 on a PalmPilot using a stylus.

    This "3D" keyboard looks like it would be pretty uncomfortable after a typical 8 hour workday. How much does that sucker weigh? I don't have to hold my QWERTY keyboard...

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  56. Bluetooth by igorsway · · Score: 1

    Looks intriguing. If they ever come out with a bluetooth version, I may buy it. Just think how this might revolutionize the laptop computer.

  57. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by prockcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I can type 50 wpm without taking my hands off the keyboard to get to the mouse i'd be very very happy.

    There's no way you can type and move a mouse at the same time. Anyone with a trackpad on a laptop can attest. My right thumb doesn't do anything when typing, but I cannot possibly use it to move the mouse while typing.. even though I can reach it just fine.

  58. Ctrl-Click Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious, but how exactly does one ctrl-click (suppose you want to drag a copy of a file in MS Windows) without getting a friend or a foot involved??

  59. An answer to the masturbatory problem by Loundry · · Score: 0, Troll

    Many folks here are commenting (jokingly) about how this device can be used one-handed. I think what people need to accept is that this is actually a serious question: "How can I use this device while masturbating?" Loser jokes aside, many geek masturbate while in front of a keyboard, be it in some sexy chat (lucky) or thumbing through porn (typical).

    I think this device could be improved by having a Penis Slot(TM). It would be a dimple (or Trench Option(TM), for the well-endowed nerd) on the device that, with the flick of a switch, would fire up the Force Feedback on "Unrelenting Vibrate " mode. Thus, at the user's command, the user can just move the whole unit onto his excited member and never take his hands off the keys.

    Now, with *that* option, perhaps $100 doesn't seem so steep!

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  60. Interesting and Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the WPM you could get if you had a keyboard not designed to slow you down (the QWERTY).
    If only people switched to something such as a Dvorak layout . You could easily double your WPM with only a little training (unless you were a great typist anyway).

    1. Re:Interesting and Informative by djkidroo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's little proof other than old wives tales about the Dvorak's superiority that prove that QWERTY was designed to slow typists down...

  61. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    get a trackball. I would love to get a Dvorak split with a trackball where my thumbs are (use one thumb to move the pointer, the other to click buttons).

  62. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by JVert · · Score: 1

    ahem I was careful with my words "taking my hands off the keyboard to get to the mouse" is not the same as "type and move a mouse at the same time".

  63. Blast from the past... by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The quadruple bucky strikes back!

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  64. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by JVert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn, best Idea from an AC ever. I'm using a microsoft ergonomic, and that wristpad has enough room to drill a hole and put a trackball in there... The hardest part would be finding some nice buttons to use for the mouse buttons. All in all, doesn't sound very hard. Super glue and duct tape, Ohhh yeaaaahh!

  65. 50 wpm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahahahahahahahaha.... 50wpm... Why in the hell would I want to CUT my speed by more than half? I regularly type 90-120WPM on a QWERTY... In fact, I usually type so fast that people will stand up in the labs and look at me strangely (it really does sound like rapid gun fire)...

    50... what a crock... Make it so I can type 200+ wpm, and we'll talk...

  66. Two words: Very Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is that supposed to be? It looks like an xbox controller that was born with slight retardation.

  67. Coder-friendly? by genixia · · Score: 1

    What about shifted numerals? It looks like the user would have to chord both the shift and numeral key with their thumb whilst hitting the appropiate number with a finger. Not exactly programmer-friendly. And what of {}[]`~|\/?,.;:'" ? If they aren't all available then it's useless.

    As for the word and email crowd, I couldn't see a windows key so they'd be screwed too.

    1. Re:Coder-friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just need the start key, the shortcut on a normal keyboard (at least in WinXP, not sure about the others) is CTRL+ESC. I'd be fairly certain that there is a shortcut for the other windows key as well.

      You'll miss the speed of doing things like Windows Key + R to get to the run dialog, or Windows Key + D to get to the desktop, as you can't do combinations such as CTRL + Esc + R and have that work, that being the only drawback.

  68. Improved Efficiency by Uplore · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it make more sense that if you are encouraging people learn to use a new input device that you would use keyboard mappings that are more efficient at the same time? QWERTY keyboard layout is not as efficient as the DVORAK layout. If you are learning to use a hand held device you may as welll learn a more efficient style.

    Also, one handed typing would be near impossible with this device would it not? No more sipping coffee and typing!

    --
    I couldn't think of a sig.
  69. key? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Where's the key? What am I supposed to when I need to SysReq, or Print Screen? To say nothing of Pause, or Break...

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  70. Happy Hacking Lite2 by Erwos · · Score: 1

    Tablet owner's perspective:

    The problem is that I could buy a Happy Hacking Lite2 USB and a good optical mouse for the same price as this thing. Yes, I have to take my hands off the keyboard to use my mouse, but then again, I don't have to learn a new typing method, either. The HH keyboard and mouse take more room, too, but then again, if they fit in a laptop case, that's enough for me.

    The AlphaGrip seemed appealing for about 10 seconds, until reality kicked in. I can't think of a situation where I'd want the AlphaGrip instead of the keyboard+mouse. The mini-joystick is cute, but I doubt it'll make for an enjoyable mouse.

    The USB hub at the top is next to useless, too. Don't they realize that having a memory stick is going to unbalance the thing, and that a cable is going to just get in the way?

    I hate to get all down on them, because this was a pretty smart plan in theory: leverage joypad familiarity into a mouse/keyboard solution. But the execution seems to be lacking. Honestly, I have no idea how I would improve on the concept.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  71. Obl. simpsons quote by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 2, Funny

    *Phone tone*

    The fingers you have used to dial are too fat. To obtain a special dialing wand, please mash the key pad with your palm now.

    --
    "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
  72. Painful by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems like with this "keyboard" you'd have to have your fingers curved and somewhat tensed to hold the controller at all times. This would seem to me to cause more discomfort than a regular keyboard where for the most of the time, most of your fingers are relaxed.

    This seems to be a recurring problem with many "alternative" keyboards like chording keyboards and such. Particularly it seems to be a problem with keyboards intended to be more "mobile". So a tip to you keyboard tinkerers out there: design your keybaord so that your fingers are lax and fully extended while no keys are being pressed.

    1. Re:Painful by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, and maybe I'm just unnatural (this much is almost certain) but my fingers curve somewhat when my hands are at rest. Then again, I've just been bitching about keyboards being too small for my bearlike paws, so perhaps I'm not the best indicator. I have large hands anyway, so I'm not about to start using this thing. It does seem like it could be an effective way to play PC games on a console, though, if you could just come up with a printable "condom" of sorts which would wrap around the controller in order to replace the glyphs on the key caps with something which better indicates the key's function in the game.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Painful by Aidtopia · · Score: 1
      It seems like with this "keyboard" you'd have to have your fingers curved and somewhat tensed to hold the controller at all times.

      Actually, the text says that you squeeze it between your palms, so your fingers don't carry the weight at all. It also seems you could rest the thing on your desktop or knees and just balance it with your palms.

  73. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by prockcore · · Score: 1

    I was careful with my words "taking my hands off the keyboard to get to the mouse" is not the same as "type and move a mouse at the same time".

    At first I thought that's what you meant, but then I thought of the laptop/touchpad thing and thought I must be wrong since that seemed to easy a solution.

    I wonder if anyone sells a keyboard with a wristrest with an integrated touchpad.

  74. Like a basketball, not a coconut by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

    Reading the page it says (and looks like) it is designed to be held by the pressure of two palms (or rest on the edges of the inner hand), not your fingers. Like the difference between gripping a coconut by the husk, and a basketball by the uhhh basketball.

    --
    My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  75. Odd keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't quite get these odd keyboard configurations. They seem like more trouble (learning) than they are worth (a bit of comfort and speed).

    I use a Typematrix. It's not significantly different from a regular keyboard, but it makes minor improvements that are very nice. I can go back to regular ones with no problem, which I don't believe you could do if you used this thing for an extended period of time.

    Typematrix removes a few annoying features of regular keyboards. The keys are in a grid instead of staggered, shift is larger taking the place of the usual shift position and the caps lock, the enter and backspace keys are in the middle, and those are the major differences. No time spent learning to use a "futuristic design". But it is much nicer than a regular QWERTY. (Plus it has hardware dvorak support!)

  76. What you are suggesting already exists! by Ghostgate · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... the virtual sex machine (http://www.vrinnovations.com/index2.htm).

    And actually, it's even better than what you suggested! Or, uh... so I would IMAGINE... er, uh...

  77. Not a PC replacement, but a Console Controller? by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

    I see absolutely no reason to get this for a PC-keyboard replacement. I guess in extreme ergonomic cases, but something you have to set down and pick up, and CAN'T use one handed if you need to, and have you ever actually tried using a thumb controlled mouse...and...

    Anyway, how I see this as a godsend is as a console controller. Plug this into your Xbox or PS/2, and you can switch instantly and seemlessly from kicking someone's butt in Mortal Kombat to taunting them in some sort of in-game chat.

    Better yet, for games like FFXI, you have all the power of a keyboard, with all the compactness and 'lap friendliness' of a console controller.

    And finally, as consoles become more and more 'internet appliances' you can take one of these and crash on the couch as you chat with your friends in Xbox Live. (I've never seen Xbox live..I don't know if there's a chat.)

    Make a PS2 or Xbox version where I toggle between keyboard mode and 'controller' mode. Have it be PC programmable via the convienent USB port...and you've got a sale.

    (Guess what, I didn't read the article. I don't know if it has Xbox support.)

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  78. There's just no reason for this - not even RSI. by Ghostgate · · Score: 1

    I mean, I could see the possible uses in gaming, where the programmable combinations are endless. But excellent gamepads and joysticks are already available for a lot less. It might also be interesting if worked into the design of a handheld computer (but as for laptops, I'll take a laptop keyboard over one of these any day).

    And for those who think these kind of gadgets are supposed to help prevent RSI, think again. To prevent RSI, it's much more important to focus on things like hand/wrist positioning, posture, and the like. Even something like the amount of pressure you apply to keys is a factor. Breaks help a lot too. I was developing symptoms of RSI 6 years ago but, realizing it, I made changes in my wrist placement and got a much better chair. Now I feel no discomfort, and I do a LOT of work at a keyboard every day. Hell, you could develop RSI using one of these AlphaGrips, if you used it improperly.

  79. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by shufler · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes. They do, in fact. We have several of them out on the floor at work.

    It's been my experience that users actually hate this concept very much, and rather prefer a seperate mouse and keyboard.

    Hence why they are on the floor.

  80. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by cuban321 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kensington makes a keyboard similar, but it's not DVORAK or Ergonomic.

  81. Jeez, I'm not sure you realize... by MukiMuki · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure you guys realize just what the implications of this device are.

    1. You can tell your employer you need it because it reduces CT.
    2. It's a GAME PAD.

    Think about it. You can play games, VIDEO GAMES, with a GAME PAD, at WORK. You can then use THE SAME PAD, the EXACT same pad, to switch to your word processor/IDE... and then you can CONTINUE TO WORK ON IT without changing ANYTHING about your hand movements or position. Imagine how QUICKLY you'll be able to get back to productivity when your boss peeks into your cubicle and how quickly you can go back to gaming when he leaves! OMFG.

    This.... this is the end-it-all slacker solution.

  82. Never buy one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because how will I be able to type with just one hand?

  83. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by JVert · · Score: 1

    doh, I thought that was a great idea, damn yea now I renember them.

    I'm out.

    This whole thing stinks, I belive now that this will only work for a fraction of the people who buy it. Which means it sucks by user standards.

  84. This latest non-qwertyuiop ... by chris_sawtell · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is a very cleverly designed keyboard. Looks just like a nice generous pair of boobs. With that look, it can't help but succeed. Must be designed especially for dotty slashers. Be in quick or they'll all be sold out before you can turn it on.

  85. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How in the world does this get modded insightful? Did you even read the post you're replying too? He doesn't want to type and move the mouse at the same time. He just wants to be able to move his mouse without having to move his hand a foot to the left than a foot back to the keyboard.

  86. Touch typing FUD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Senior year in high school, everyone was required to take at least three classes. The three classes I took were: English, T.A., and just for shits and giggles, computer basics (typing class with a glorified name). This typing teacher demanded that everyone use home row, yada, yada. To be honest, I was cranking out usually ~80 WPM (faster than the teacher at 73) using my little version of hunt and peck. The people using home row? 20 WPM. I finished every lesson in just under a week and played games for the rest of the semester. How nice: English, T.A. for the English teacher, play games, go to Arbys, then go home. God I miss that.

    Point is: People shouldn't stress stuff. If I can type better using my version of hunt and peck, leave me alone.

  87. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who makes these keyboards? I've long been interested in one (or something similar) because I type with the keyboard on my lap and reaching for the mouse often means moving my entire body or chair to get it. While most users may hate such an idea, I'd be quite happy with one.

  88. DID THEY FORGET SOMETHING???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the 'space' key?

    DoIhavetotypelikethis?

  89. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny
    My right thumb doesn't do anything when typing, but I cannot possibly use it to move the mouse while typing.. even though I can reach it just fine.

    Oh, so you are stuck on only using your thumb, eh?

    What? Too good to use your nose like the rest of us?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  90. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by eidechse · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you seen the touchstream by fingerworks? I got one of these right after I first saw it for that same reason. Expensive, but cool.

  91. Great by Foreign16 · · Score: 2, Funny

    One more thing I'll get phone calls about: "Hey, whats up, nothin man, just can't find the 'K' on my keyboard, you know where it is?"

  92. Completely useless by JRHelgeson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right now I am typing with both hands on my laptop, in the dark. I cannot see the keys. Sometimes I choose to type with one hand, albeit slowly, but it works when your other hand is holding a kid, or eating ice cream. Other times I stand up and key in letters one at a time using a single finger.

    This keyboard offers none of this flexability. Obviously someone thought this to be a good idea, but didn't realize that it should be left at that. They need to meet up with the No Hands Mouse people. http://www.footmouse.com/

    Why would I want to go from xx WPM down to 0 when my only option is to use both hands.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now I am typing with both hands on my laptop, in the dark. I cannot see the keys. Sometimes I choose to type with one hand, albeit slowly, but it works when your other hand is holding a kid...

      Holding a kid...in the dark...in front of a computer...pedophile!!!

  93. Organic shape? by bazabba · · Score: 1
    I dont quite understand what they mean by Organic design for comfortable typing.

    Is the design based on a living organism?

    1. Re:Organic shape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they mean ergonomic.

  94. Finally a gamepad for Nethack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last the hardware vendors realize that roguelikes are the future of gaming.

  95. Gamers by hckrdave · · Score: 0

    Do you think that this would be worth anyting for first person shooters? It looks like it might be awsome for RPGS... ???

  96. can we now look forward to... by tabby · · Score: 1

    XBox MMORPG's now that we can type in them?

    --
    I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
  97. Double Bah by vga_init · · Score: 1
    In reality, most of us have spent years and years learning to type on a standard keyboard. It's a specialized skill.
    I have to disagree with you there; it only took me a month or two of practicing touch typing to learn the entire keyboard, and I absolutely insist that it is easier than everyone makes it out to be. Provided that people put forth the right effort, anyone can learn to do it. It is true that some people will be fast and some will be slow (I was one of the speedy ones), but touch typing is simply something your brain absorbs naturally, and it absolutely should not take "years and years" to learn, though it may take a bit of time to reach your best speeds.
  98. Yes! by Akagi82 · · Score: 1

    This is a sign of impending doom. Someone has suceeded at creating something more retarded than the X-Box controller.

  99. Hmm by Brainix · · Score: 1
    This may be a decent product, but I found the why page bold at best, and mildly offensive at worst. A few choice quotes:

    "The Problem: Limited Productivity of Desk-Free Computing"
    "The Solution: A Patented Handheld Touch Typing Device" (Emphasis mine.)

    "Lean Back, Relax, and Type as Fast as You Think -- Maybe Faster" (Is this a statement on how fast I could type, or on how slowly I think, or on how slowly this company thinks I think?)

    This, followed by a timeline of input devices: chisel, quill, keyboard, AlphaGrip.

    Am I too sensitive?

    --
    Raj Against the Machine! http://social-butterfly.appspot.com/
  100. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by houghi · · Score: 1

    If I can type 50 wpm without taking my hands off the keyboard to get to the mouse i'd be very very happy.
    Sure. No problem. There are different solutions.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  101. break == required by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    Over here in Holland it's actually required for you to take a 10 minute break if you've been working with a pc (actually any type of computer that uses a monitor) for 2 hours.

    1. Re:break == required by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      forgot to mention that if this work is intensive, you are required to take a 10 minute break after 1 hour, or to do alternative work.

      Also it's not allowed to work more than 6 hours a day with a computer. Hmm .. i wonder how my boss will react if i tell him that 2 hours before i stop working :)

  102. Appearances by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Funny

    They look a lot like an xbox controller, but contains 42 buttons and a analog stick.

    Oh, so more like a simplified X-Box controller.

    Listen to the rabbit.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  103. other countries by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

    What about keyboard layouts from different countries? How easy, if at all, can I adapt this alpha thing to cope with the different layout itself and also additional keys? How convenient are shortcuts to hit with this thing? control-c as an example I expect to be supported, but there are a ton of more involved shortcuts being used by applications.

  104. Um, sorta. by Skadet · · Score: 1

    We've got several halves of the story.

    *Yes, QWERTY spreads the letters out.
    *No, it wasn't because the close letters jammed. It was because _any_ letters typed quickly enough caused a jam.
    *Yes, in the end it sped people up because of fewer malfunctions, but the goal was to be easy on the machine.

    Sorry for the nitpicking, but I just wanted to get it straight (thanks to Cecil Adams' Straight Dope http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_248.html -- good bit on Dvorak, too)

  105. Using tablets and keyboards by Dr_Java · · Score: 1

    It seems silly to have a chord keyboard that takes two hands. I found http://www.handykey.com/site/twiddler2.html more helpful. Means you can use a tablet pen in one hand and a keyboard in the other.
    --
    New thinking, old games

  106. This is just what I need by ChronoWiz · · Score: 1

    for my wearable computer! Using a pair of powergloves for the keyboard doesn't work as well as it does in the movies.

  107. Goldtouch Ergonomic Keyboard. by mesmartyoudumb · · Score: 0

    If You're using a Microsoft ergo keyboard, I suggest trying out the keyboard I've been using for over a year now; The Goldtouch Ergonomic Keyboard, It's pretty darn adjustable. Heres the website for you that want to check it out( 200$ on there.. 30$ on ebay );

    click Me

    They recently changed their name from Goldtouch to Key ovation,sooo dunno how that'll work out. :p

    --
    "Comedy's a dead art form. Now tragedy, that's funny."
    1. Re:Goldtouch Ergonomic Keyboard. by mesmartyoudumb · · Score: 0

      Oops , a hrefs dont work
      Ebay link;I suggest buying from Compaq parts(No its not me or anyone i know, i bought mine from him tho and hes cheap.)

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=51083&item=5113696441&rd=1&ssPageName=WDV W
      http://www.keyovation.com/ergonomics/product/usbke yboard.html

      --
      "Comedy's a dead art form. Now tragedy, that's funny."
  108. One more point! by Sindri · · Score: 1

    - Only able to type English.

  109. Only 4 patents? by cakefool · · Score: 1

    Only 4 patents since 2001? These guys have got to get with it - everyone knows you're not a successful business with less than 1000 patents per year! /sarcasm

  110. Finally. .. by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... a console controller for playing 'nethack'.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  111. What about binary velo type speeds on this thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool design, hands seem more relaxed then on the twiddler2 someone mentioned.

    Mayor bonus is QWERTY compatibility, this helps when you are back at a normal keyboard. It also keeps first time users from being scared shitless. It's like QWERTY blind typing on the back of a gamepad.

    I would love to use a binary velo type system on this thing: where a is one button b is another button and c is those buttons combined, then you would have zero finger displacement just push to type, no other movement. If you bother to learn the alphabet like that (coding the abc into finger-combos) you could do live subtitling, reach amazing speeds just like the velo type users.

    To bad they didn't put such a mode into the ROM, easy to learn for QWERTY users and amazingly fast for those who bother to do some training. Maybe they have firmware so you can upgrade later.
    --
    Dennis SCP

  112. QWERTY - yes, for avoiding jams by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, while QWERTY wasn't designed to slow people down, it _is_ designed to avoid jams.

    The thing is, the contraption consisted of (more or less) a semi-circle of thin levers, each with a little hammer with an embossed letter on it. All were aimed at the same position on the paper. You press a key, and purely mechanically the lever would swing the hammer at the paper. (Well, actually, at the ribbon.)

    Also, because it was a purely mechanical contraption, the cheapest and most reliable way to build one was: keys that are close on the keyboard, would also activate levers which were close to each other.

    Jams would happen when two close enough levers would be activated at the same time. Or close enough. The closer the levers were, the more likely you'd get a jam. (Again, purely coincidentally, this also meant "the closer two keys were".)

    E.g., pressing "Q" and "P" at (almost) the same time would never jam. They swung from opposite directions, and it was pretty much guaranteed that one hammer would simply hit on top of the other. E.g., "A" and "S" at the same time (e.g., while typing "ASSASSIN") would pretty much always jam.

    So basically, QWERTY:

    1. was just supposed to prevent jams. (Which cost more in typing speed than a couple ms worth of more finger movement.)

    2. was not designed to do anything to typing speed as such. Neither maximize it, nor minimize it. Whatever typing speed difference it produced, it was "side effect", rather than "goal". (And, again, a lot of it came from jam prevention rather than anything else.)

    3. the _only_ typing speed consideration it received at all, was a rigged tech demo. Ever wondered why the "QWERTYUIOP" row? Because the rigged tech demo was basically "Look! I can type 'TYPEWRITER' quickly! It must be an optimal layout!" Hence all the letters in the word TYPEWRITER had to be on a single row.

    (Hardly a scientific study, but PHBs bought it anyway.)

    Furthermore, I'd point out that:

    A. It did a piss-poor job even at spacing common letter combinations apart. E.g., even in their tech-demo "TYPEWRITER" they have letters which are near each other: "TY", "EW", "ER", and thus prone to jamming. "W" and "R" aren't that far apart to be jam-proof either.

    B. if you've ever used one of those purely mechanical typewriters (no, some electronic thing doesn't count), you'll notice that typing was a different exercise on those. It involved keeping your hands above the keyboard and hitting the keys pretty hard. At the very least it's _not_ the same RSI prone position you'd use on a normal PC keyboard.

    C. a PC keyboard doesn't jam.

    D. Even if you do type the wrong letters on the PC, the cost of errors is next to nil. Correcting a mistake was a _very_ time consuming operation on a mechanical typewriter, since it involved physically erasing or covering printed stuff with white paint. By comparison, hitting backspace on the keyboard costs a small fraction of a second.

    Etc.

    So basically I'm saying that the considerations from which QWERTY was born, not only were imperfect to start with, they bear exactly _zero_ relevance to a computer keyboard. That QWERTY still works well, is more of a testimony to the fact that people can learn _any_ keyboard layout well enough, than some inherent advantage.

    QWERTY, Dvorak, even alphabetical order, IMHO you probably just type faster on whatever you have more exercise. That's all.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  113. Keyboard for FPS/RTS by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    I believe they put one of those out. For FPS games, it was The Claw. Basic idea was that you rested your hand in a vaguely hand-shaped mold and pushed buttons at your fingertips along with some decently sophisticated macro changes so that the buttons could be easily modified.

    For RTS games, there were a few devices out. Out the top of my head there was the N-50 Speedpad which involved a one-hand control with 10 buttons, a directional pad, and the usual ability to map macros and the like. There was at least one other I saw advertised... looked vaguely like the Atari Jaguar controller complete with 50+ buttons.

    Honestly, I have never seen either of the devices in use, but the people who reviewed them always seemed to find them handy. I suspect it's like buying an X-Arcade stick for playing MAME games, something that you do if you're hardcore, but probably not worth the cost for a casual gamer.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Keyboard for FPS/RTS by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Actually I own both of those devices (although I have the n52) and I freaking LOVE them. Most hard core players swear by the keyboard, but it really improves my game.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  114. No scroll wheel? No 3rd button? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Since you are holding with both hands and it has a mouse replacement you are I think not supposed to move your hand to the mouse. So how do you scroll? How do you use the 3rd mouse button? Not all of us are on a dumbed down OS you know? (intelligence of OS user can be determined by the number of mouse buttons in use by the OS. Apple 1, drool squad. MS 2, barely able to walk upright. *nix 3, homo sapiens.)

    Other have already mentioned how hard special key combinations will be.

    So it is more of a straight text input device rather then something to use for say browsing, launching an app or two and doing "computer" work. More something a typist would use for writing straight text.

    Mmmm, many have tried to replace the standard old keyboard and so far the only change I have seen in the real world is the split keyboard and the ones in use in court rooms by clerks. Those devices I believe don't work with a regular alphabet at all.

    So the only use I can see for such a device is for providing transcripts. Nice but there already exists stuff for that.

    Oh well nice idea. Another replacement keyboard, file it in our cabinet with all the other wannabe replacements? Yeah I know it looks like the dumpster.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  115. Guess you don't use your feet for the mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess you don't use your feet for the mouse?

  116. Here is why I probably won't try it.... by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    * In my experience, joystick/joybutton mouse is almost as bad as a touch pad for doing CAD.

    * In practice, my hands are not constantly on the keyboard. I'm referring to documentation, looking things up, drinking my coffee, etc. This looks like I'd have to carefully put it back in its stand everytime or else wind up hitting unwanted keys.

    It's a good try, but I don't think it suits my needs. Keep trying though, I still want something I can use on an airplane.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  117. Games? by dakkon1024 · · Score: 1

    I do not see this improving my quake abilities. =)

  118. Odd images on the site by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    Maybe I need a hobby since I'm looking at "corporate" images too closely, but it doesn't look like this fellow would really know what to do with (maybe he does reps of 20 or something).

    She, on the other hand looks like the go-getter from the 22nd century and uses the keyboard as she waits in line for the CokeMobil food packets.

    This lady would probably try to make a call using that device to her friends in Santa Monica.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  119. Is it me ... by RLW · · Score: 1

    ... or does this thing look like half of a cow's utter ?

  120. X Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey - where's the third mouse button? And don't tell me to emulate three buttons either - clicking both at once f-ing sucks.

  121. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by shufler · · Score: 2, Informative

    The majority of the ones we have are by a company called CIRQUE. The model is a Wave keyboard (ergonomic, like the Microsoft Natural), and has a touchpad in the wristrest called a "Glidepoint." We have two models -- one has the Glidepoint in the centre of the wrist pad, and the other has it off to the right, under the directional arrows.

    The two models are KXB340 and the GKB330. Actually, these both have it under the directional arrows, I can't seem to find one with it in the middle at the moment.

    Allt he models have a single cable to the computer, which splits into a PS/2 for the keybaord, and a DB-9 as the Glidepoint is a serial mouse. You can either get a DB-9 to PS/2, or bite the bullet and join the 1980s.

    The FCC-ID on both of those, if you care, is GYUR33SK.

    We also have some Fellows keyboards that have a detachable rest, that features the Glidepoint as well. The wristrest/Glidepoint has a PS/2 connector running from the side. The keyboard model is KB-7903, with an FCC-ID of E8HKB-7903. The Touchpad model is KB99842, which appears to also be the part number for the keyboard.

    Hope this helps.

  122. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by itchy92 · · Score: 1

    Soooo... not similar at all, is what you're saying?

    --
    Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
  123. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Mateito · · Score: 1
    From the link:
    Use the LP with your laptop by placing it on top of the laptop keyboard.

    How dumb is there intended audience?

  124. emacs? by funkmeister · · Score: 1

    Could you imagine using this thing with vi or emacs? I'm not seeing to many emacs shortcut keys from the picture.

  125. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by jschottm · · Score: 1

    I spent a few weeks during summer break doing data entry on an early series Thinkpad, and actually got quite good at using the eraser mouse while in the midst of typing. It's one of the reasons that years later, any laptop I buy must have one.

  126. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by BlueGecko · · Score: 1
    How dumb is there intended audience?
    Well, speaking as the owner of one, we're smart enough to spell "their" correctly...
  127. Gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For modern day computer gamers, this is basically worthless. You cannot replace the mouse/trackball with something LESS precise. However, for a typist in an office environment or instant messaging, this is likely a good tool. I'd imagine just the difference in the ergonomics would reduce carpal-tunnel-syndrome cases. You'd have someone typing with a regular keyboard for part of the day, and this thing for the rest. Dictation services would benefit, since they only need around 50wpm and are typing THE ENTIRE SHIFT.

  128. Horse Collar by coyotedata · · Score: 0

    Now I know what they are doin wit all dem thar ol horse collars.

  129. 3D-Keyboard? by NilsK · · Score: 1

    AlphaGrip's 3D Keyboard Ready For Pre-Orders

    One "D" always seemed to be enough for me.

    Nils

  130. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Mateito · · Score: 1

    Technically, "there" is spelt correctly.

    If you are going to be a pedant, at least point ou t that it was a grammatical error, not a spelling error.

  131. DELETE PARENT POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PARENT POST IS POOPIE

  132. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that was a spelling error. The writer clearly meant 'their' but wrote 'there'. The sentence does not make sense otherwise, so the intention is obvious, and it's a spelling error, not grammar.

  133. Why are we typing every letter? by lamona · · Score: 0

    The real problem ... ok, one problem of many, is that we are still typing every letter when in fact there is very high predictability in our language that makes shorthand feasible. And speeds things up. There is now software that takes the output from a court reporter's shorthand (see the keyboard) and expands it out to full words. And the first thing that we all learned in programming is the vowels are pretty much unnecessary.

    Oh, and another thing, I am NOT recommending an expansion of the autocorrect function in M$ Word. Surely we can do better than that.

    Now watch this swing.

    --
    I just read /. for the amusing .sigs
  134. You can learn to game, but... by raquelm · · Score: 1

    Ok, how many of you console gamers out there are masters at whizzing through the key sequences required to completely crush your opponent or do that cool trick? I'll be generous and assume "most." Now, explain to me how in a matter of hours, you master the up,up,left,X,B,Y,right,down,left required for your favorite special move (without looking), yet typing on a similar device is: unrealistic to expect learning something different from QWERTY expecting people to touch type is rediculous (do you look while gaming?) learning a new layout "flusters" people (come on, you addicts buy every cool new console out there, most with different layouts) And as far as "ten hours of marathon gaming can kill my hands" goes, skip the gaming death grip while typing.

  135. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50 wpm after a month? Why would I want to switch? I'm at nearly 90 wpm on my standard keyboard.

  136. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by eidechse · · Score: 1

    They're generally smart enough to figure out that setting it on a laptop isn't the main idea.

  137. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me too. It's a shame that Toshiba has moved to touchpads-only of late.

  138. Re:How Fast? Fast enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trackpoint is just one of the reasons I love the sony c1 picturebook keyboards

  139. Obvious ... by cfuse · · Score: 1
    1. I look dumb enough already whilst typing - I don't need to look like I'm playing Doom III on nightmare while I'm doing it.
    2. You want me to learn a new interface. I hate learning new ways of doing an already boring task.
    3. Call me when it can read my mind.
  140. ordered one by Nasser · · Score: 1

    well I just ordered one. I wonder how close they are to getting their target 5000 orders. I havent seen anyone else order one from slashdot, so I guess I must be #1/5000.