Slashdot Mirror


Mount St. Helens Alert Status Increased

DarkHand writes "Mount St. Helens has become even more unstable in the last few hours. The U.S. Geological Surveys Cascades Volcano Observatory has increased the volcanic alert around the volcano to level 2 and released a press release: 'Over night, seismic activity at Mount St. Helens has accelerated significantly, which increases our level of concern that current unrest could culminate in an eruption. We are increasing the alert level to the second of three levels [...]. Earthquakes are occurring at about four per minute. The largest events are approaching Magnitude 2.5 and they are becoming more frequent. All are still at shallow levels in and below the lava dome that grew in the crater between 1980 and 1986. This suggests that the ongoing intense earthquake activity has weakened the dome, increasing the likelihood of explosions or perhaps the extrusion of lava from the dome.' The most recent readings at the SEP seismograph stationed on the lava dome itself are totally saturated. The ground is now literally constantly rumbling."

600 comments

  1. To quote Counter-Strike: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Get outta there, it's gonna blow!"

    1. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too bad no one has a defuse kit... :(

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

      Even if I had one, I wouldn't get close enough to try.

      I live in Tacoma and that still feels too close.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    3. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by mwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone be sure to tell all those Californians who came and built $3,000,000 houses perched on sticks halfway up the side of the mountain.

    4. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by destiny71 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And we want to tell these people why???

      It's the same reason I don't feel for anyone in the expensive beach houses in Florida. You have a thin stip of land jutting out into an ocean constantly active with hurricanes. Just like the rich people in California building stilt houses on the side of mountians in earthquake zones.

      People, this is why YOUR insurance premiums are so high! Rich people feel the need to build expensive houses in very unstable locations.

    5. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by zogger · · Score: 1

      My GF is a retired stewardess, and coincidently was in the last airliner allowed to land at your airport (I believe that is the one she mentioned, rings a bell) when it erupted last time. She said it looked like the end 0 de whirrled and stuff.

      I hope it doesn't go as bad as last time. Listened to a geologist last night for awhile before I crashed out on george noory coast to coast show, he sounded like he was more than a bit concerned over it.

    6. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hopefully it's just overplayed paranoia on the part of the media.

      So far the Vulcanologist at the University of Washington had said it's cool, and they know a bit more about that sort of thing than I do.

      I didn't live here the first time it blew up. I had just turned 5 and living in Florida. All I remember about that time was that it was hot, and someone stole my bike.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    7. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by jdray · · Score: 2, Informative
      The last news report I heard on the radio (I'm in Portland, where on clear days you can see the crater from downtown) said that the expected eruption will probably include "a lot of steam and a few boulders being thrown around." I think they meant boulders being thrown around inside the crater. At least that's what I'm hoping.

      Essentially, they're saying just enough about every possibility that, once it's all over, they can claim that they predicted it would happen that way.

      Had to laugh at the OP quote, though. Doesn't "SEP" stand for "Somebody Else's Problem"?

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    8. Re:To quote Counter-Strike: by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1
      Even if I had one, I wouldn't get close enough to try.

      Where's that +5, Extremely Intelligent moderation when you need it?

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

  2. REM fans unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. if only to shout "Leonard Bernstein" at this point.

    1. Re:REM fans unite by mrgrey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lyrics... Though I did like the way David Spade and Chris Farley sang it better...

      That's great, it starts with an earthquake, birds and snakes, an aeroplane -
      Lenny Bruce is not afraid. Eye of a hurricane, listen to yourself churn -
      world serves its own needs, don't misserve your own needs. Feed it up a knock,
      speed, grunt no, strength no. Ladder structure clatter with fear of height,
      down height. Wire in a fire, represent the seven games in a government for
      hire and a combat site. Left her, wasn't coming in a hurry with the furies
      breathing down your neck. Team by team reporters baffled, trump, tethered
      crop. Look at that low plane! Fine then. Uh oh, overflow, population,
      common group, but it'll do. Save yourself, serve yourself. World serves its
      own needs, listen to your heart bleed. Tell me with the rapture and the
      reverent in the right - right. You vitriolic, patriotic, slam, fight, bright
      light, feeling pretty psyched.

      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

      Six o'clock - TV hour. Don't get caught in foreign tower. Slash and burn,
      return, listen to yourself churn. Lock him in uniform and book burning,
      blood letting. Every motive escalate. Automotive incinerate. Light a candle,
      light a motive. Step down, step down. Watch a heel crush, crush. Uh oh,
      this means no fear - cavalier. Renegade and steer clear! A tournament,
      a tournament, a tournament of lies. Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives
      and I decline.

      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

      The other night I tripped a nice continental drift divide. Mount St. Edelite.
      Leonard Bernstein. Leonid Breshnev, Lenny Bruce and Lester Bangs.
      Birthday party, cheesecake, jelly bean, boom! You symbiotic, patriotic,
      slam, but neck, right? Right.

      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine...fine...

      --
      -Tolerate my intolerance
    2. Re:REM fans unite by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Or, perhaps even more appropriate, Volcano by The Presidents of the United States of America:

      under the island middle of a mountain
      there is a big bad boomin' system
      blowin' speakers woofers and tweeters
      amplifiers melted wires
      the parties exploded the core is corroded
      under ground the puget sound
      cause a shiftin' and a drifin'
      big black boom box stuck in the hot rock
      it's in there flowin' it's in there growin'
      you don't believe me that this scenery
      could be a cold blooded killer
      it's gonna blow volcano
      it's gonna blow volcano
      it's gonna blow volcano
      now the island is shiftin' the plates are liftin'
      the core is creamy docile and dreamy
      stopped up and steamy
      happy campers poop in there pampers
      when the mountain becomes a fountain
      of white hot lava molten magna
      super sonic plate techtonics
      stero phonic lava and tonic
      the boom is bionic
      sony shut down magnavox meltdown
      ballistic breakdown
      hi fi heatwave lo fi lava cave
      that sulfur smells mt st helens
      pompeii was yellin'
      it's gonna blow volcano
      it's gonna blow volcano
      it's gonna blow volcano
      it's gonna blow volcano

  3. yarr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    yarr

  4. Scary, yet cool. by methangel · · Score: 5, Funny

    All of these hurricanes, tornadoes earthquakes, floods, and now volcano eruptions...when do the plagues and locusts start happening?

    1. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How does HIV and West Nile mosquitoes sound?

    2. Re:Scary, yet cool. by deathcloset · · Score: 1

      when haven't they been happening?

    3. Re:Scary, yet cool. by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean like in that little acid trip with the demons and the anticrist and everyone dying multiple times? :P

      --
      Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
    4. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Sc00ter · · Score: 4, Informative
      Unless you're old or have a very weak imune system West Nile just causes flu like symptoms for a few days..

    5. Re:Scary, yet cool. by dcigary · · Score: 1
      --
      ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
    6. Re:Scary, yet cool. by iworm · · Score: 4, Informative

      FYI much of Africa has, for several weeks now, been suffering from a extraordinary plague of locusts.

      e.g. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own _correspondent/3689808.stm

    7. Re:Scary, yet cool. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Got your locusts right here and here. As for plagues, aren't we being smote by cellphones?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Scary, yet cool. by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 0, Troll

      Withint 7 years after the Americans elect the antichrist for president.

    9. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of these hurricanes, tornadoes earthquakes, floods, and now volcano eruptions...when do the plagues and locusts start happening?

      They'll keep coming until bush is gone.

    10. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Nishal · · Score: 0

      yeah it is a bit odd that in this election year we have the wrath of god stuff.........c'mon we cant get dubbya near washington right now? tell him saddam ,osama, or wmd are there, he will come running

    11. Re:Scary, yet cool. by zev1983 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Florida was punished for the 2000 election. Washington is being punished for Microsoft.

    12. Re:Scary, yet cool. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny
      All's that's left is for the sea to turn to blood.

      Oh. Nevermind

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    13. Re:Scary, yet cool. by tverbeek · · Score: 0

      Great, so sometime in the next 3 years then. Or doesn't the first "election" of GWB count?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    14. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Cat_Byte · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      the antichrist is leader of a one world government and the whole world wanders after him. He comes in as a lamb..so that would be under the pretext of a peaceful man. That is not the United States. Someone attacks us and heads roll, countries fall, and leaders go into hiding. It also states that the one world government would be without the wings of the eagle. I'm all for pulling out of that crap. They don't do anything. 10 years of drawing new lines in the sand in Iraq did alot of good. I'm not saying I completely agree with how it was done, but I do completely disagree with how it was handled the 8 years prior. We need a one world religion as well. Thanks to the muslim extremists that will probably happen to get rid of radicals. The temple mount has to be rebuilt and a one world currency comes into effect...damn Euro....its ugly.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    15. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as soon as george bush is sworn in for another 4 years

    16. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what people were saying about the 8 attacks on Americans by terrorists during the Clinton administration. Hell even the pilots on 9/11 trained for years while Clinton was in office. He just wouldn't do anything so they weren't going to stop.

    17. Re:Scary, yet cool. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind. --Leviticus 11:22

      God sends manna from heaven to starving millions and everybody bitches. What up wit dat?

      KFG

    18. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plagues will start soon, and will only stop when the infidels have all been crushed. We have them surrounded and are pounding on them with our ... uhh... natural catastrophes.

    19. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Strog · · Score: 1

      I know of a couple people in my hometown that were fairly healthy and got a bad case. One was in a coma for a few days and the other was very sick. Both took months to get their strength back. Granted most of the time it's like a bad case of the flu and over but don't minimize it.

    20. Re:Scary, yet cool. by geekfoo · · Score: 1

      All of these hurricanes, tornadoes earthquakes, floods, and now volcano eruptions...when do the plagues and locusts start happening? Just after the sky turns to blood

    21. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      The locusts are already here...

      Africa had massive (i.e. >10km long swarms) this year...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    22. Re:Scary, yet cool. by caino59 · · Score: 1

      You aren't kidding...

      From a religious standpoint, things seem to be coming to a close.

      Revelations says to look at nature, the signs will be there. I'm not saying the world is going to end tomorrow, but looking at the world around us, we seem to have at least started the downwards spiral.

    23. Re:Scary, yet cool. by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't worry about any of it...

      Luke 21:9
      "But when ye shall hear of wars and commotions, be not terrified: for these things must first come to pass; but the end [is] not by and by.

      Luke 21:10 Then said he unto them, Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom:

      Luke 21:11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.

      Luke 21:12 But before all these, they shall lay their hands on you, and persecute [you], delivering [you] up to the synagogues, and into prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for my name's sake."

      For those that believe, this is just all part of God's perfect plan.

      --
      I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    24. Re:Scary, yet cool. by minator · · Score: 1
      All of these hurricanes, tornadoes earthquakes, floods, and now volcano eruptions...when do the plagues and locusts start happening?

      Locusts are causing big problems in Africa right now, then there's SARS, Bird Flu...

      I think the situaton can best be summed up by the following phrase: "Oh Shit!"

    25. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, it's such a harsh punisment too, kind of like the punishment recieved for they're monopoly, not existant.

      --
      Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
    26. Re:Scary, yet cool. by MadMartigan2001 · · Score: 0
      Hmmm. Lemme see...
      "famines, and pestilences, Nation shall rise against nation, persecute [you], into prisons, etc..."
      If that's a perfect plan, I'd hate to see what plan B looked like. God needs to go back to the drawing board, or at least mellow out a bit.
    27. Re:Scary, yet cool. by AviLazar · · Score: 2

      The Sun to turn black and the moon to bleed red.
      Better yet:
      Cats and dogs, living together....

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    28. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For those that believe, this is just all part of God's perfect plan.

      Somebody mod parent funny! Quick!

      --brought to you by the Slashdot AC Campaign for the Destruction of the Moderation System by means of Irony.

    29. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Kehvarl · · Score: 1, Funny

      I here quote Plan B from the Ultimate Ineffable Guide to Being a Deity. Part of the Complete Idiot's Guides for Dummies series of Training Manuals:

      Plan B: Fsck it.

    30. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Simsypoo · · Score: 1

      Proverbs 31:7 let them drink and forget their poverty and remember their misery no more. sounds like a perfect plan to me!

    31. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some lakes have already.... http://www.kingsleylake.org

    32. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God didn't say He planned all this destruction, He just predicted it. God doesn't want death, distruction or pain. We are living in a controversy between good and evil. If you want to blame the current events on someone, compare the world of perfect peace God has for us with what satan has organized down here.
      Remember, God has a place for you of peace and safety. It is satan who governs the world we live in. God is allowing satan to demonstrate his way of government so that we may make an informed decision on who's side we will stand under. All we see around us is pain and suffering, and we tend to blame that on God, when God is trying bring each person into a world of perfect peace. Why we don't all choose Him is beond me. God does not force us to choose His way becouse forcing someone against their will is not love, just like we wouldn't want president Bush to force us into something we didn't want even if he thought it best for us.

      Not trying to preach here, this concept has just blessed my life a lot. It's all in the Bible.

    33. Re:Scary, yet cool. by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      God is allowing satan to demonstrate his way of government so that we may make an informed decision on who's side we will stand under.


      Pretty bad teaching system, don't you think? One would believe that an all-knowing, infinitely powerful, and infinitely good Being would have some nicer means to inform us of the facts.

    34. Re:Scary, yet cool. by ohmagod · · Score: 1

      uhhhhh, i think we're doing that right now in the middle east. stay tuned, film at 10.

    35. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He comes in as a lamb..so that would be under the pretext of a peaceful man.

      That man is from CANADA!!!!

    36. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Micah · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about all that stuff either, but mainly because most of Luke 21 was fulfilled in the same generation as Jesus. :)

      Luke 21:32 -- I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.

      Indeed, all those things you mentioned, and more, were fulfilled up to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70, just like Jesus predicted less than 40 years before. Yep, part of God's plan. But nothing to be concerned with here, move along. :)

    37. Re:Scary, yet cool. by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      all-knowing, infinitely powerful, and infinitely good

      Heh, you brought up the the catch-22 in organized religion. If God is all of those things above, then how do we resolve the fact that people are allowed to suffer here on earth? How can a God who is all knowing, all powerful and all good even allow one soul to go to hell? Where is the grace in a God who lets those things happen?

      Always makes for interesting conversation with people who only repeat what others tell them without ever actually thinking about it.

    38. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're mistaken. Bush is Nostradamus's "village idiot," not the Bible's "antichrist."

    39. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would have loved to have taught us by better means, but we chose to follow satan. God can't just force us to do it His way just because He knows it would be less painful for us. He tried to warn us. He gave us a beautiful world in the beginning, hoping we would trust Him. He didn't make robots though and I praise Him for that.

    40. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no catch-22. We chose to do it satans way. It God did what you seem to imply He should have, we would have grounds to complain that He didn't really let us choose, and that He is indeed a dictator. I would not want to live in such a world and I don't think you would either.

    41. Re:Scary, yet cool. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Faith requires that you accept the fact that an all knowing God would know more about what he's doing than you do. First assume (for the sake of argument) that there is an all power being....are you really going to question Him? I'll consider his plan, but I know I have no hope of truly understanding it.

    42. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few people each year in the Southwest US get Bubonic Plague.

    43. Re:Scary, yet cool. by warkda+rrior · · Score: 1

      Pretty bad teaching system, don't you think? One would believe that an all-knowing, infinitely powerful, and infinitely good Being would have some nicer means to inform us of the facts.

      He did inform us. Didn't you get the memo?

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
    44. Re:Scary, yet cool. by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Interestingly they are also listing that in the US.

      Yahoo/AP news

      Its a great time to start a cult!

      --
      Sig it.
    45. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look...I know you people like to mod negative regardless of the rules, but if someone replies to someone else about a subject its not offtopic. mod the parent offtopic if you want and the whole thread gets filtered. sheesh.

    46. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Flaimbait.. Sometimes I hate it when I agree with the mods. :]

    47. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the plagues i dunno, but for the locust you should have asked where, not when, and the answer would have been africa.
      *cough*

    48. Re:Scary, yet cool. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are a 100% omnipotent and omnipresent being, then there is zero difference between predicting something and planning something. You can cause anything you like to occur, and you can stop anything you like from occurring. Therefore everything that happens happens with your blessing and approval.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    49. Re:Scary, yet cool. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that when a believer says they don't have any hope of understanding god's plan, I never seem them act like they really mean it. If they really meant that, then it would be *just* as wrong to claim (for example) that god is all good, just as wrong as it would be to claim that god is doing evil by letting evil exist. If you don't know god's mind, then you can't say god is good. You just don't know.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    50. Re:Scary, yet cool. by SirBruce · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately your position has been well-analyzed in philisophy and found to be wanting. Free Will is often used as the excuse for how an all-loving God can allow evil in the world. However, if God were also omnipotent (all-powerful), then he should be able to create people who indeed HAVE free will, and yet nevertheless never CHOOSE to do evil. The only way to refute this is to say that you believe in the "actual choice" concept of free will; that is, one does not truly have free will unless one chooses to sometimes do one thing and other times and other times another in the same circumstance. But this seems quite silly. Let's say you go get ice cream every week. The parlor only has two flavors, chocolate and rocky road. You don't like rocky road, so you always order chocolate. Do we conclude that you didn't really have the power to choose ice cream flavors, simply because you always chose chocolate? Indeed, that you might actually choose a flavor you DON'T LIKE seems to reduce Free Will to some sort of randomness. What good is Free Will if we do not use it to choose those things we actualyl want to do? So, it's impossible for there to be Free Will and for God to be BOTH all good/loving and all powerful. You have to drop one of the three. Or come up with a better explanation of how Free Will works. :) Bruce

    51. Re:Scary, yet cool. by MadMartigan2001 · · Score: 1
      but we chose to follow satan
      Um, who is this "we" you are talking about? Last time I checked, the decision was made thousands of years before our births. So how can someone who has not yet been born make a choice?

      I think your statement would be better stated as "but THEY chose to follow satan, and the rest of us are suffering the consequenses because GOD is an ASSHOLE who punishes people for choices they never made!"

      Ahhh, reality is so bitter/sweet!

    52. Re:Scary, yet cool. by thegooch49 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we really need Tommy Lee Jones and Pierce Brosnan to go into the crater, and save the Northwest! They'll figure something out!

    53. Re:Scary, yet cool. by mangu · · Score: 1
      You reason like a jesuit. Everything you say is logically consistent, but you omit one basic fact. Look at how this thread started: "God is allowing satan to demonstrate his way of government so that we may make an informed decision on who's side we will stand under." If God were, indeed, omnipotent, then He would be able to devise some better way to inform us so that we could decide on whose side we stand under.


      Besides, free will doesn't mean randomness. If there is a decision that's logically correct and another that's wrong, every intelligent and well-informed person will opt for the same right choice.

    54. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      "Mass hysteria!"

      "Yes, Mister Mayor, it's true - this man... has... no balls."

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    55. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its kinda like an apple tree. The whole thing is an apple tree because its first stem cell in the seed was an apple tree cell. Just because God thinks His way is better doesn't mean He should impose it on Adams children. Let's imagine this whole thing happening the other way around. Imagine adam started evil, and then chose to follow God. Would you want all his decendents to start out evil so they would have to make the choice for themselves? Of course not. So which way is it. Unless we take our parents side to begin with, someone is arbitrarily imposing his system on us. So, yes... Because adam made the wrong choice, we all are in this together. God has gone through quite a bit to help us individually make a choice for Him and for an abundant life.

      I can almost hear you say though, so wouldn't my children then be automatically good if I choose good? Well, depends on what you think of as good. There is much difference between deciding to do one good act and deciding to do one evil act. Its like smoking. Smoking that first one has much longer consequences than not smoking one after you have already been hooked. I may have chosen to do good, but until I am recreated into a being that is perfect (as though I had never chosen evil), I will still battle. As a result, I pass that battle on to my son/daughter and while they may be more likely to make good choices, they still battle.

      So why doesn't God just make us perfect now when we choose Him. Because it is a demonstration down here. Imagine you were an angel in heaven. Imagine you had seen humans down here killing and distroying each other. Would you want those humans up in heaven? Even if they said they wouldn't do it anymore? Even if God said they were now perfect? Hey, Adam was perfect in the beginning too. But he choose to follow evil. No you would want to see that these people would consistantly choose good, even in the face of constant temptation to evil. We are adicted to sin, and while God gives us the power and desire to follow Him, we still have a battle. We still are demonstrating our aligence to Him.

      Hope that helps. Somehow I keep hearing that God should force us to live in a world without pain. Just because he thinks it is better. Some of you out there would be miserable in His world because of what you have tought yourselves to like. That could be changed, and He is ready to help you, but it is really your choice... not His. God is not punishing us. Our own actions have natural consequences. The Bible does not teach ever burning hell like so many belive (www.bibleinfo.com) That doctrine does not square with a God of love and is nowhere described in the bible. God does not torture us. We experience the results of the lives we live, and would do so even if He did not exist. Most athiests would agree to that.

    56. Re:Scary, yet cool. by True+Grit · · Score: 1
      Faith requires that you accept the fact

      No, Faith requires that you accept ideas as fact without evidence to prove they are fact. Faith and facts just simply don't mix very well. For Faith, facts just get in the way.
    57. Re:Scary, yet cool. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      When you have faith, in your mind it is a fact. That should have been pretty clear...nice potshot though..."facts just get in the way".

    58. Re:Scary, yet cool. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      That is a very good point, but you have to have faith in something. Basically faith in what the bible says (I've heard it all, please don't retort with written by man etc...faith)...that is what you can hang your hat on if you're a Christian. That's where you get your basis on what is true and what isn't.

    59. Re:Scary, yet cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, you brought up the the catch-22 in organized religion. If God is all of those things above, then how do we resolve the fact that people are allowed to suffer here on earth? How can a God who is all knowing, all powerful and all good even allow one soul to go to hell? Where is the grace in a God who lets those things happen?

      You're glossing over the flip-side of God's nature... God is a just God, which means that if you don't obey him you get sent to hell. Since humans have a sin nature, and will always end up disobeying, we're all headed for hell. Except that God is a graceful God and gives us a second chance.

      As for why He allows natural disasters... /shrug, it's part of his plan or he may be allowing the Devil to dig a deeper hole.

    60. Re:Scary, yet cool. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just turn that around and wonder how a God who is all knowing, all powerfull and all good could allow even one person to go to heaven?
      I know, I know, -1 for a post containing the word God in a forum populated almost exclusively by anti-religious zealots.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    61. Re:Scary, yet cool. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      correcting myself here: technically that sould be "omniscient", not "omnipresent".

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    62. Re:Scary, yet cool. by True+Grit · · Score: 1
      When you have faith, in your mind it is a fact.


      No, in the believer's mind it is now a fact, but that doesn't make the fact true, and thus, in my book, it is not a fact. To rationalists listening to the believer it is still *faith*, because the believer has not shown sufficient evidence to make it a 'fact'.
    63. Re:Scary, yet cool. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Nitpicking. You know what I meant.

      Evidence doesn't make something a fact. Simply being a fact make something a fact. Because something lacks evidence doesn't make it not a fact (you did not say this, I'm not insinuating), it just means there's no evidence and nothing more.

      (For clarity of the following paragraph: it = "God exists and Jesus is His son")

      We can argue over technicalities all day long, but in the end it doesn't come down to fact or not, it's a matter of faith not fact. I have faith that it is a fact. You're not going to be lead to believe it by evidence showing it to be a fact, but by faith and faith alone.

      Why is it this way? Why doesn't God give us evidence as He did to Saul and others in the Bible? I honestly don't know...I wish I did, but I don't need it(evidence) for faith. I'm very sorry if you do.

    64. Re:Scary, yet cool. by koryn · · Score: 1

      If God is all of those things above, then how do we resolve the fact that people are allowed to suffer here on earth? How can a God who is all knowing, all powerful and all good even allow one soul to go to hell? Where is the grace in a God who lets those things happen?

      Probably gone to the same place as the "infinitely just and allows free will" that you've conveniently forgotten.

      Always makes for interesting conversation with people who only repeat what others tell them without ever actually thinking about it.

      Pot, meet kettle.

    65. Re:Scary, yet cool. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      you have to have faith in something.

      Yes, but I don't see this as a good thing. It's an unfortunately unavoidable evil that knowlege has to rest on unproven axioms at some point. It's not something to celebrate.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    66. Re:Scary, yet cool. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      I'm not celebrating it....you don't think I'm saying that I believe in God because I "have to have faith in something", do you? I hope not, because that's not what I meant.

      I'm enjoying this conversation, but this medium isn't really appropriate...if you'd like to continue it in IM you can reach me on AIM: rootedmyth and MSN: myth@[the website in my sig minus the WWW] or on my forums @ http://discussions.rootedbox.com

    67. Re:Scary, yet cool. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in continuing.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    68. Re:Scary, yet cool. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem is that Christianity simultaneously posits:
      1 - a god that is omniscient about not just the present, but the future too.
      and
      2 - that there exist people other than god who have free will.

      #1 and #2 cannot exist in the same universe. They describe mutually exclusive concepts. The only way for some being to be omniscient about the future is for that being to have a perfect prediction of what will happen, in a manner that makes that prediction inevitable and inescapable. If that is the case, then events in the universe are fated to happen the way they do, and thus there is no free will.

      For us to have free will, god has to be capable of being mistaken in his prediction of what we are going to do.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  5. Dante II by ancice · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do people still remember the show Dante's Peak? It had a real cool legged robot which went into the volcano to collect samples. Wonder if these cool and useful machines are still being used or is everything remote sensing now?

    1. Re:Dante II by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      If I remember right, it didn't work correctly when it counted.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:Dante II by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Informative
      Wonder if these cool and useful machines are still being used or is everything remote sensing now?

      I can't remember if they actually ever used those (I really don't think so, I think the show used them because they are "cool"), but since right now they are interested mainly in seismic and gas, not rock samples and such, it's the remote sensors...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:Dante II by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
      Darby's Seventeenth Rule of Scientific Discussion

      When discussing vulcanology, one should avoid using as one's primary reference a movie in which Pierce Brosnan successfully drives a pickup truck over several meters of red-hot lava.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    4. Re:Dante II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It had been cooling down for a few minutes.. :)

    5. Re:Dante II by vegasbright · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The movie is actually pretty accurate in a geological sense. One of my geo professors actually reccomended it as a study guide, allbeit one that must be taken w/ a grain of salt.

      --

      Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
    6. Re:Dante II by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Earlier in the week, they used a helicopter to drop a guy onto the lava dome in order to set up some instrumentation. The helo pilot was constantly monitoring... something so that if the "event" was about to occur, he could jerk him outta there and fly away.

      I have a feeling that robot thing was Hollywood bunk.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:Dante II by peacefinder · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was trapped on an airplane when I saw Dante's Peak. (Flying into Seattle, no less.) That is, with the possible exception of Reefer Madness, the worst movie I have ever seen. I was about ready to pull a DB Cooper just to get away from it, but mercifully the nice lady from British Airways clubbed me unconscious.

      Now that's good airline service.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    8. Re:Dante II by gangibson · · Score: 1

      It's OK, the engine had a snorkel!

      [Cut to shot of the engine's snorkel.]

      That was the best part of the whole movie for me.

    9. Re:Dante II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it was an SUV, not a pickup truck.

    10. Re:Dante II by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      WHAT? Its NOT possible to paddle a canoe through an EXTREMELY acidic lake with your hand covered with only a shirt?

      In the words of my wife (geologist) "Worst movie ever". //also funny in the Comic Book Guy's voice from the Simpsons.

      --
      Sig it.
  6. memo to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Memo to self: Don't live anywhere near an active volcano.

    1. Re:memo to self by dykofone · · Score: 5, Funny
      From the article: GPS instrument on the lava dome...suggest that the site moved a few inches northward Monday and Tuesday.

      Looks like you also have to be sure you don't live in the path of an active volcano. At that rate Mount St. Helens could reach Canada in a few thousand years!

    2. Re:memo to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you also have to be sure you don't live in the path of an active volcano.

      Damn, and I just booked a vacation to British Columbia in the early 84th century. The rates are just fantastic when you reserve in advance.

    3. Re:memo to self by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1
    4. Re:memo to self by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know you're just trying to be funny, however this is just a GPS instrument that has moved on the lava dome itself. Mount St. Helens did not move a few inches north in a couple of days. Nor will it tomorrow, or likely in the next thousand years.

      --
      No Comment.
    5. Re:memo to self by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 0

      Live near hurricane central instead.

    6. Re:memo to self by at_18 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean like the 300,000+ people who live on mount Vesuvio?

    7. Re:memo to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As easy as that concept may seem .. people in tornado alley or hurricane central still don't get it.

    8. Re:memo to self by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      It moves, just in very tiny pieces. In 1980 larger pieces moved up to 300 miles. Within 3 days, ash got to the east coast. But I know what you meant anyways.

    9. Re:memo to self by slim-t · · Score: 1
      Memo to self: Don't live anywhere near an active volcano.

      Just go to Volcano, Hawaii. Nice little town, at the top of the most active volcano in the world. I'd live there if I could. I would recommend the Volcano House to anyone - a hotel at the edge of the crater.

    10. Re:memo to self by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      Well then I hope you don't live anywhere Yellowstone National Park. I guess the entire park could be a buried volcano, with all the hot springs and guysers it makes sense... If it were to "erupt" massivly it would take out half the US. Good luck trying not to live next to that....oh and before the flaming...no i am not a vulcanologist nor did I ever claim to be. Just remember catching the tale end of a blub on discovery or something...thought it was kinda interesting.

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    11. Re:memo to self by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      all part of our plan to invade canada when it's nice and warm up there again...

    12. Re:memo to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GPS instrument is probably stationary with respect to the lava dome. The dome does, in fact, grow inches in days, and is moving the instrument with respect to the GPS system by stretching.

    13. Re:memo to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goes to show you... Even the volcanoes are getting sick of the Bush administration.

    14. Re:memo to self by Glamdrlng · · Score: 2, Interesting
      As easy as that concept may seem .. people in tornado alley or hurricane central still don't get it.
      We do get it, we just don't give a shit. I love living in florida and I'm not leaving because of a couple storms. For those who are moving away, go! We never wanted you around anyway. The rest of us have enough sack to stick around, and we have enough common sense to go somewhere safe when a storm's coming.
      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    15. Re:memo to self by AmmoBox · · Score: 1

      Dammit! I never got that memo. I can see St. Helens from the hills near my house!

    16. Re:memo to self by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      "Looks like you also have to be sure you don't live in the path of an active volcano. At that rate Mount St. Helens could reach Canada in a few thousand years!"

      It's coming straight for us! Fire!

    17. Re:memo to self by dlt074 · · Score: 0

      i live about 40 miles south of this beast. there are people in my office taking the day off to drive up there and look around! we have also started a pool for when she blows.

    18. Re:memo to self by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Memo to self: Don't live anywhere near an active volcano.

      unless it happens to be shield volcano, like Hawai'i. Your home might get burried by lava, but you'll likely know when it's time to leave, and will probably have enough warning to even load a truck first.

      Of course, you could always live in Florida instead...

    19. Re:memo to self by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Unless that somewhere safe isn't up to code and partially collapses? ;-) It would be nice if you could at least build inground bunkers to hide out the nasty wind like smart people do in Tornado Alley, but you've got no ground to dig in!!! The whole state is what, 12 feet above sea level?

    20. Re:memo to self by glsunder · · Score: 1

      GPS instrument on the lava dome...suggest that the site moved a few inches northward Monday and Tuesday. ...
      At that rate Mount St. Helens could reach Canada in a few thousand years

      Maybe it's expecting them to reinstate the draft?

    21. Re:memo to self by dykofone · · Score: 1

      Good point, the Iraq war might only be half over by then...

    22. Re:memo to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep. Super volcanoes. When the last one exploded, it reduced the human population (shown through the reduction of genetic diversity in mitocondrial DNA) so low we were *almost* extinct. Of course that was 600,000 years ago. And BTW, wer're long overdue for the next eruption.

    23. Re:memo to self by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      It's a very large, but spread-out magma hot spot. Basically, magma hotspots are the things that are under volcanoes, but the difference between Yellowstone and a volcano is that in a volcano the magma is capped and under pressure, so it can only leak up in a few spots, and it does so with quite a bit of force, enough to push land up, and trigger earthquakes. The magma at yellowstone, however, is spread evenly over a large area, and can bleed off heat a little at a time all over the place. But it is a very large hotspot, and it's been around a while. It's been shifting position relative to the plates in the crust - such that it's the same magma spot that once created Devils' Tower, and the Black Hills, hundreds of miles away.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    24. Re:memo to self by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      For some reason I never did understand, the practice of building houses with basements underneath isn't as common in tornado alley as it is in the northern midwest (where tornados exist but are less frequent). Up here, any house without a basement would be considered rather incomplete by most residents who have just come to expect basements. It's a nice place to put your stuff, and it doesn't cost any more real-estate, so why not have one?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  7. If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I could find a way to make Micro$oft seem responsible...

    1. Re:If only... by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      Well, where do you think I've been dumping all my old MS install disks? I shoulda guessed that the volcano wouldn't like them either...

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    2. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my! CHEESE! CHEESE! Not CHEESY SOFTWARE!

      No Monkey for you!

    3. Re:If only... by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

      How close is MSH to Redmond? Is there any chance of burying Micro$oft in lava or ash? I remember reading a story in junior high about a boy chasing after his dog in Pompeii when the volcano erupted, and they showed a picture of the boy, preserved by the ash, with his dog, (which now brings flashbacks from a certain Futurama episode). How cool would it be to A.) be rid of Microsoft for a few thousand years, and B.) have every Windoes OS preserved in ash; fossilized for when our (welcomed) alien overlords unearth them in the future?!? We could be looking at the means of our liberation when the Evil Aliens try to load Windows 3.1 and are brought to their knees by millenia-old crappily written code! Who's with me?!?

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    4. Re:If only... by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

      The weight of their massive corporate offices and use of water from underground sources has allowed hot magma to bubble out toward Mt. Saint Helens over the past decade?

      Monkey Boy dancing causes seismic episodes in nearby mountain?

      Wrath of God for making His computer crash incessantly?

      Take your pick!

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    5. Re:If only... by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting that MSH is really M$H, running WindowsNT?

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    6. Re:If only... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

      Well, lets put the pieces together

      Bill Gates = Sauron
      Microsoft Bob = The Ring of Power
      Mount St. Helens = Mt. Doom

      It's all coming together now...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    7. Re:If only... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Watch out for the strange, blue lava...

    8. Re:If only... by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      About 3 hours. MSH is closer to taking out all those damn linux hippies out in beaverton, Oregon then it is Microsoft.

    9. Re:If only... by gid-goo · · Score: 1

      And Veritas and Intel along with the OSDL folks.

    10. Re:If only... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      eep!! Quick, Rsync ODSL over to my Shuttle Aria!!!

    11. Re:If only... by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      However, I don't think Bill Gates wants Microsoft Bob back.

      --
      hey!
  8. How severe? by sdo1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I don't get out of any of the reports I've read is how severe of an eruption is possible here. Could it be massive like the big one that blew the side off of the mountain or are we in for a little puff (or as little as little can be on a volcanic scale)? Or do they just not know?

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:How severe? by southpolesammy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seismologists are expecting anywhere from nothing at all (not uncommon following an earthquake swarm, happens at Kilaeua from time to time), to a moderate event.

      By comparison, the 1980 blast was a catastrophic event. A medium strength earthquake caused the entire north face of the mountain to crumble in a massive rockslide, which also uncorked the pressure on the magma underneath, resulting in a huge lateral explosion through the rock slide. Imagine a wall of rocks coming at you at 300mph. It's doubtful that something like that will happen again in our lifetimes.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    2. Re:How severe? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Informative

      OK, I haven't done any geology in over two decades, so take this with a grain salt, but my understanding is that one of the reasons that the "big one" was so big was that St. Helens had not erupted for centuries and the top of the lava tube was blocked like a giant zit. When enough pressure finally built up to blow the cap off, it threw crap everywhere. That would indicate that the currently forecasted eruption is unlikely to be as large, although it could still be a significant event.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    3. Re:How severe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least from that Volcano with 2/3 of it's mass still gone ;)

      However, Mt. Rainier could do some massive devastation in our lifetime. Like burying a dozen or so towns and cities under 20'+ of mud all the way to the Port of Tacoma.

    4. Re:How severe? by n-baxley · · Score: 1

      A very astute question. All of the reports I've read are that this will be a very minor eruption. In fact, the debris from the eruption will probably be contained in the crater itself. Unfortunatly I can't remember where I read the article, but trust me. If you're not on the mountain you don't need to worry.

    5. Re:How severe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has to do with the composition of the lava too. There is a lot of dissolved gas in it and it's not as elastic(?) as say other more active volcanos. So it's more of a boom type place.

    6. Re:How severe? by vegasbright · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an undergrad geology student (I admit i specialize in sedim. geo), The 1980 eruption's power had a great deal to do with the mountain blowing its wad after a massive landslide uncovered themagma. after teh lava belched forth, it spewed sideways instead of straight up. This non vertical episode greatly increaed the volcanoes blast radius. Think about a muzzle blast from a gun several hundred (thousand?) meters wide and you have the tree leveling power present. The accumulated stratovolcanic debris is in a crater. Hopefully there is not a breach outsideof the crater. I havent seen any of the vecors for magma movement, so who knows. I and my colleagues are keeping an interesting eye, byut my previous prediction I admit now was slightly off.

      --

      Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
    7. Re:How severe? by Webmoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      The pressure didn't "blow the cap off" so to speak, but more precisely, the pressure caused the north face of the mountain to bulge, which became unstable and failed catastrophicaly. This released the pressure, allowing the trapped gases to forcibly eject volcanic matter both laterally and vertically, giving us the devastation of the Toutle River valley and choking the Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers, and the memorable ash cloud rising some eighteen miles into the sky.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    8. Re:How severe? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I agree. If you look at pictures of Mt. St. Helen's today, you see that the present lava dome is in the middle of a giant crater. That giant crater is where the rest of the mountain used to be.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    9. Re:How severe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      difference being that hawaii is a hot spot, not a subduction zone created volcano.

      different type of flows

    10. Re:How severe? by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 1

      wouldn't the previous eruption have either blown away or solidified (with magma turning lava/rocks and locking other dust/loose rocks) most of those loose rocks by now?

      if a similar eruption happened, would you still have the problem of rocks coming at you at 300mph or would you be in a situation where the lava stalls before it can do a lot of damage?

      maybe your not the right person to ask, but you seemed educated

      --
      Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
    11. Re:How severe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems somehow appropriate the The Crawling Chaos' zits have crap in them.

    12. Re:How severe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Seismologists are expecting anywhere from nothing at all (not uncommon following an earthquake swarm, happens at Kilaeua from time to time), to a moderate event.

      By comparison, the 1980 blast was a catastrophic event. A medium strength earthquake caused the entire north face of the mountain to crumble in a massive rockslide, which also uncorked the pressure on the magma underneath, resulting in a huge lateral explosion through the rock slide. Imagine a wall of rocks coming at you at 300mph. It's doubtful that something like that will happen again in our lifetimes.


      According to the Volcanic Explosivity Index, Mt. St. Helens was rated as a 5 (out of 10, but it is a logarithmic scale). This is considered a cataclysmic event, however, it was still small beans compared to other (more recent eruptions) that we have seen.

      The 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo was rated at 6 on the VEI scale, and despite this, is only the second largest eruption to have happened in the 20th century.

      Eruptions at Monserrat (1995) were also quite high. There is also a risk for possible activity at Etna and Popocatépetl that can be quite large.

      VEI 5 and 6 events happen every 10 - 100 years, so we'll actually probably see quite a few of these in our lifetimes. ;)

    13. Re:How severe? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Seismologists are expecting anywhere from nothing at all[] to a moderate event.

      Somehow the word "moderate" isn't very reassuring when it comes to volcanos. Kinda like the pilot coming on the PA system and saying "Don't worry, it's only a small yeild nuclear device in the baggage hold."

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    14. Re:How severe? by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not a vulcanologist, and I didn't even sleep in a Holiday Inn last night, but I do follow vulcanology as something of a hobby, and know a little bit about the Mount St. Helens 1980 eruption.

      First off, it's not the lava that people should be worried about. Lava flows are for the most part slow. Movies like Volcano and LotR:RotK would have you believe that lava flows are fast, huge, and unavoidable, but for the most part, surface flows are generally localized at any given point in time and move on the average less than 1mph. Steep inclines and subterranean channels can get it to move faster, but it's surface lava that is life-threatening. However, due to its slow progress, it's usually possible to get out of the way of a lava flow (assuming the terrain allows it -- I've been on the lava delta of Kilauea and I wouldn't want to be caught outrunning lava out there -- rocky, glassy hell).

      Instead, it's the pyroclastic flows, lahars, tephra, and in the case of the May 1980 eruption, the massive landslide and the lateral blast that are far more destructive than a lava flow. A slow moving lahar (mudflow) can still travel at about 10mph and that's past the ability of most people to sustain at a jog for any length of time. Even getting to higher ground is not a guarantee of being able to escape a lahar. Pyroclastic flows can get up to about 100mph of very hot ash and gas and are for the most part unavoidable. But it was the lateral blast from the 1980 eruption that caused the devastation, sending large chunks of the mountain travelling at over 300mph more than 15 miles away. The blast itself was measured to be roughly equivalent to a 7 megaton explosion. That's almost certain doom within the blast radius. Check here for more info on volcano hazards.

      However, it's highly unlikely for MSH to have another eruption during our lifetimes with devastation on the scale of the 1980 blast. I don't think that there's enough earth left between the mountain and the magma chamber to produce a landslide of that proportion again on MSH. Also, from what I've seen so far, it is more likely that a phreatic eruption will occur than a plinian eruption. It is still capable of pyroclastic flows and lahars, but I'm hesitant to believe that a blast and landslide capable of the destruction of the 1980 eruption can occur there again any time soon. Some more good information about the 1980 eruption can be found here.

      Anyway, as I said before, I'm an amateur on the subject, so for better or possibly more correct info, I'd suggest contacting the USGS. All things considered though, let's just hope none of us ever have to witness an eruption of the Yellowstone Caldera. It would likely be one of the last things most people on the planet would ever see.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    15. Re:How severe? by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

      Comparisons between volcanoes & zits are great. Keep 'em coming.

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  9. *spoiler alert* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    KABOOM!

    1. Re:*spoiler alert* by Kris+Warkentin · · Score: 1
      --

      In Soviet Russia, hot grits put YOU down THEIR pants.
    2. Re:*spoiler alert* by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > KABOOM!

      "No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow... What? Somebody's gotta have some damned perspective around here! One day, BOOM!"

      (muttering to herself) "Boom. boomboomboom. BOOM!"

      - Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5

    3. Re:*spoiler alert* by freqres · · Score: 1

      No, Kaboom!

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
  10. hack the planet! by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

    Someone ought to send DJ Qualls in there to fix it. Just make sure he doesn't get stuck inside a geode.

  11. Mt St Helens seismic and other info by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by nawspac · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by slackerboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm hoping it's really foggy out there this morning, because the image that I'm getting is just a very soothing blue color.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    3. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Wonderful view of the mountain this morning *G*

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    4. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      The webcam appears to be covered in ash.

    5. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by fizban · · Score: 3, Funny

      That soothing blue color is just there to make sure you don't see anything that could alarm or disrupt you this morning, like for instance an erupting volcano.

      (Thank you D.A.!)

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    6. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by vegasbright · · Score: 0

      Uhoh, the server is either too busy or the camera is buried under debris from a pyroclastic flow/lahar.

      --

      Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
    7. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by TopShelf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You really should quit using Windows ME...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    8. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You vicious bastard you just /. My ring side seat!

    9. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by edge_crumbler · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the erruption, but I do care about the shadow of that massive mutant fly I just saw on that web cam picture!!! Argh!

    10. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      Along with all of those links, the National Geographic Web Site has this cool picture of people looking at the before and after of the eruption.

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    11. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice going, eh....
      File Unavailable The file you requested is temporarily unavailable. Please check back in a few minutes.
      now we can't tell if it's the server or the volcano

    12. Re:Mt St Helens seismic and other info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got that turned on as my active desktop background image, so I can refresh it with F5 every so often. I'd like to see "Microsoft Plus" desktop backgrounds top "livevolcanoexplody.bmp..."

  12. Not to be gross... by The+Queen · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but I've always thought of volcanos as Mother Earth's acne.

    As I was watching Katie Couric interview one of the scientists this morning, I just kept thinking that these guys are all waiting for this big head to pop so they can collect measurements on the pus.

    Sorry, kinda icky, but these are my thoughts. Mod down if you have a weak stomach.

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    1. Re:Not to be gross... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching Katie Couric...that sure is gross.
      As for the volcano: diligaf, I live in the east.

    2. Re:Not to be gross... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      Sorry, kinda icky, but these are my thoughts.

      I've kind of thought that too. I'd hate to see the size of the tube of Oxy needed to get the swelling down.

      I wonder if dematology metaphors and analogies for the Earth's crust are popular with Gaians and other New Age types?

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    3. Re:Not to be gross... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

      Now why were they waiting for Katie Couric's big head to pop? They would save that for a slow news day or to get her another George Foster Peabody award.

      --
      "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    4. Re:Not to be gross... by The+Queen · · Score: 1

      Ding! Well you can start the stereotype with me. Eclectic solitary, but earth-based nonetheless.

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  13. The situation is clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Washington possesses weapons of mass destruction. They must disarm immediately or face regime change.

    Do you want the first warning to be a mushroom cloud over Washington State Park?

    1. Re:The situation is clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... does that mean that because I live in WA that I'm now a terrorist?

    2. Re:The situation is clear by vegasbright · · Score: 0

      This just in, just for you: Evidence of George W Bush taking bribes from Halliburton is buried in the Mt St Helens Crater. Why dont you go check it out and report back to us. Its buried, so dont stop until you uncork the mountain.

      I mention Mt. St Helens, so its not offtopic.

      --

      Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
  14. Ahh, this is the life by PriceIke · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sick of all these damn hurricanes, honey. Where else can we live?

    I want to get as far away from this place as possible. How about Washington?

    Works for me, let's go!

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    1. Re:Ahh, this is the life by jon787 · · Score: 1

      The UP of Michigan. You just have to be used to getting snow, lots of snow. Enough snow to shut down most urban areas, but we just keep on going. Enough snow that you can walk out the second floors of most buildings and not fall. The only nice thing is that the snow fall is pretty reliable. Few blizzards, just constant, constant snowfall. We also live away from most of the primary and secondary nuclear weapons targets here in Houghton.

      Although the geology majors say that my dorm lies across an inactive fault line.

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    2. Re:Ahh, this is the life by Alsee · · Score: 1

      US disaster map:
      Bottom right, hurricanes!
      Top left, volcanoes!
      Bottom left, earthquakes!
      Center, tornadoes!

      Want to get as far as possible from natural disasters?
      Book a flight to top right, New York City!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Ahh, this is the life by mikefe · · Score: 1

      But New York is a natural disaster!

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    4. Re:Ahh, this is the life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, thats an easy one. Move over to the home on linux, namely finland.

      Ok, we have abit cold in the winter, and some mosqitoes in the summer. But no storms, no quakes, only 1 brand of poison snake, no alligators, no scorpions, and no dangerous spiders, no volcanoes, no bush. Only bad thing is that dsl's still are expensive :-)

  15. Curious by reactor_man · · Score: 0

    I know Folorida pissed some higher being off, Butwhat did the state of washington do ? But seriously, how many eruptions has this volcano had since say 0 AD? Is this a trend towards moe frequent eruptions in the area?

    --
    Boiler ? what boiler? I just water cool my Eight-way opteron box!
  16. Well, that settles it... by MmmmAqua · · Score: 0

    ... the Army really is looking out for my best interests. Here I thought they sent me to Iraq because, due to the "Rumsfeld doctrine" (horseshit), the Army found itself drastically short-handed. Turns out they just wanted me to be safe from the volcano I live next to!

    Wait, my family...

    Damn. Excuse me while I extract this big green phallus from somewhere intensely personal.

    --
    Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    1. Re:Well, that settles it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldnt you be driving next to an IED? Make sure to tell the rest of your brothers to get out of the vehicle before you do.

    2. Re:Well, that settles it... by MmmmAqua · · Score: 1

      I realize this is getting offtopic, but how could you in good conscience say something like that? I attended a memorial service today for a soldier killed by an IED. I've also carried the bodies of three friends from battlefields in Iraq, all killed by IEDs.

      How do you wake up every morning and like yourself?

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
  17. Re:Exciting! by TykeClone · · Score: 1, Funny

    I love hurricanes ... but then I live in the midwest so they won't directly affect me :).

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  18. Plagues and locusts are the least of our problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The presidential debate season begins tonight

  19. Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by noselasd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hmm. I was hoping to see a live volcano eruption here, but it seems
    not to be broadcasting now. Anyone knows why/what's happening ?

    1. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's probably cloudy up at that elevation. It was like that yesterday until about mid-after noon when the clouds began to burn off.

      --
      Hmmm.
    2. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The camera is actually working, but it is currently dark here in the NW and there is a lot of cloud cover on the mountain too.

    3. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dont watch it for too long or when the cammera start broadcasting again there will be an ant really close to the lense making the ant look over 10 feet tall scaring everyone who watches. On the news that night, all the anchors will say I for one welcome our new invading overlords.

    4. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      Hmm I say it's an alien contact situation. I'm not paranoid I've seen close encounters of the third kind.

    5. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by Java+Pimp · · Score: 5, Funny

      seems not to be broadcasting now. Anyone knows why...

      Yeah, you just /.ed it.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    6. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

      It could one of two things; Either the volcano's emitting a hallucingenic purple fog or it's a foggy dawn. I can't say for certain which one of the two it is.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by jberkom · · Score: 1

      They don't turn the camera on until later in the day. Try again in a few hours...it should work.

    8. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by klossner · · Score: 1

      You posted half an hour before local sunrise (7:09am PDT.) I just climbed that mountain two weeks ago. Guess I did something to irritate it.

    9. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by SHiVa0 · · Score: 1

      Think they forgot to remove the lens cover on that webcam?

    10. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      (-1, Redundant)

      The volcanocam is NOT turned off at night. It's on all the time.

      If you can't see a picture at night (i.e., it's black), that's because it's dark. Duh. Even on a clear, moonlit night, the camera is not sensitive enough to see anything.

      If the picture is grey (or maybe purply-gray), that's because it's foggy. This camera is at the Johnston Ridge Observatory, on a ridgetop staring laterally into the crater (JR was in the direct path of the lateral blast on May 18, 1980). This area is frequently covered by clouds & fog, obscuring the mountain.

      When it clears up, the pic is impressive.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    11. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's actually the legendary 'purple haze' that Jimi Hendrix sings about in the so named song. Jimi is from Washington, and it is a little known fact that the song, 'Purple Haze' isn't about a psychadelic experience, but rather his secret yearnings to become a vulanologist and study the strange purple fog of Mount St. Helens. Who knows what sucess and fame he might have achieved if he had only followed his dream...?

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    12. Re:Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      The invasion has begun!

      This is an actual image from the volcanocam, captured 30 Sep 2004 at 9:59:01 PDT.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  20. Cool! by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

    That's what this country needs... MORE VOLCANOS!!

  21. Before anyone posts the lame Florida hurricane map by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Insightful
  22. Live volcano cam by cpaluc · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.fs.fed.us/gpnf/volcanocams/msh/ It looks pretty grim. (Is it dark @ 6:30am @ MSH?)

  23. A wonderful place to visit by Cade144 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was there about ten years ago, with a college field trip. Being from the Midwest, I haddn't seen any real volcanos until then. I was looking forward to seeing the terrific devistation and other formations left by the 1980 eruptions.
    While driving up the windy mountin road to get to the park, our van turned a bend, and suddenly I saw before me a swath of devistation so utterly complete that I knew only some tremendous force could have removed all the trees and other signs of life.
    I asked the "vetrans" of the group if we had reached the blast zone already. They responded: "Nope, that's just a clearcut. The blast zone now has much more wildlife."
    Ah well. I was just there to look at the rocks anyway.

    1. Re:A wonderful place to visit by jmoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I visted in the summer of 2000. I thought that after 20 years there really wouldn't be much to see from the eruption. I was very wrong. There are still whole valleys with little tree growth and only the decaying remains of the forest that was around the volcano. There is a whole lake that was created from the melted snow on volcano when it blew. It was really cool seeing a piece of pumice (sp?) bigger than me setting by the road.

      --
      The world isn't run by weapons anymore, or energy, or money. It's run by little ones and zeroes, little bits of data.
    2. Re:A wonderful place to visit by ipfwadm · · Score: 4, Informative
      Uhhh... are you kidding?

      I was there last summer, 23 years since the 1980 eruption, and the power with which that thing erupted is still evident all over the area.

      For instance:

      • A picture from high on the flank of the mountain looking back down one of the lava flows from the 1980 eruption. Notice the green patch on the hill to the left, which was missed by the lava flow.
      • Looking at the same spot, this time from below. You can really see the effects of that hill here -- it diverted the lava, and everything behind it is green, while everything else was destroyed.
      • A panorama from the rim of the mountain, looking down into the crater. This should give you an idea of how big a crater the eruption left. The top of the mountain was simply blown away. Even while we were there, every few minutes we could here rock tumbling down into the crater, some of them huge boulders. The sides of the caldera still aren't stable, 23 years after the fact.
      • Spirit Lake. All that gray stuff you see are trees. Thousands of them. They were all killed in 1980 eruption, and are now just floating on the lake. It's called the "floating forest" of Spirit Lake.
      • This is a hillside about TEN MILES from the blast site. See how the trees were just blown right over? And no, this one isn't a clearcut. According to this page, most of the trees within a 600 square kilometer area were blown over by the blast.
      Another testament to the destructive power of a volcano is Crater Lake in Oregon (formerly Mt. Mazama), which blew its top 7500 years ago. The eruption, which is estimated to have been more than 40 times more powerful than Mt. St. Helens (link here) left a crater 5 miles wide, which has since filled up with water. There is still a desert-like pumice plain just north of Crater Lake, noticeable 7,500 years after the fact. Even Yellowstone National Park is itself a former volcano. It's just hard to tell when you're there because the caldera is absolutely enormous (a good portion of the park is itself within the caldera rim), and it happened 600,000 years or so ago. Just google for 'yellowstone eruption'.
    3. Re:A wonderful place to visit by sbowles · · Score: 1
      My visit to Mt. St. Helens was in 1984. At that time, when you drove in on 504 (along the North Toutle River) the experience was just as you had expected. One minute you were surrounded by forest, the next, devastation. It seemed like we had been transported to the moon. There was nothing but miles of volcanic ash.

      The most awe-inspiring sight was the uniform orientation of the fallen tree trunks. Whether the lay uphill, downhill, or sideways along a hills face, they had all fallen in one direction away from Mt. St. Helens.

      --
      You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
    4. Re:A wonderful place to visit by umeshunni · · Score: 1

      True.. check out the photo I took there a while back - 3'rd photo. Look at all the dead trees

    5. Re:A wonderful place to visit by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0

      <I>even</I>

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    6. Re:A wonderful place to visit by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0

      {Ahem.} Pardon the confusing previous accidental post. You say, "Even Yellowstone National Park is itself a former volcano."

      It is by no means a "former" volcano, but rather a now-quiescent and immensely powerful volcano that is so large that it occupies a geological catagory of it's very own: "supervolcano."

      Yes, that's right; lovely Yellowstone Park is the site of the world's most dangerous volcano. Should it erupt again on a scale similar to it's previous (and unprecedented) eruptions, we can expect to see a radius of devastation hundreds of miles wide from the blast itself accompanied by worldwide crop failures as the ash blots out the sun for several months. In short, if there's any geologic feature that has the power to turn life as we know it completely upside-down, it's Yellowstone.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    7. Re:A wonderful place to visit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the grandparent post was trying to make a statement about logging/clearcutting of forests, not to belittle the destructive power of the eruption.

    8. Re:A wonderful place to visit by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      I believe the grandparent post was trying to make a statement about logging/clearcutting of forests, not to belittle the destructive power of the eruption.

      Agreed, but in doing so he made it sound as though there was no longer any indication that the eruption had even happened, which is blatantly untrue.

    9. Re:A wonderful place to visit by mikefe · · Score: 1

      In the second from the right titled "Full Frontal".

      Did anyone look at that one read the title, and then immediately scroll to the bottom?

      Well, if you do, "Full Frontal" has an entirely different meaning... ;)

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  24. is it bad news when by ObjetDart · · Score: 1
    You read this story, go to the Mount St. Helens webcam to see for yourself, and all the picture shows is static?

    OK, so maybe it's just dark there at 6:40 am.

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
  25. Re:I have to wonder by ooh456 · · Score: 1

    I think they are using the Service Pack 2 firewall utility.

  26. better mt. st. helens than mt. rainier by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    ifd you live in tacoma, mt. rainier is the one you worry about

    pdf map of lava flow hazard from mt. rainier to tacoma

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:better mt. st. helens than mt. rainier by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      While this is good for the Tacoma area, you have to remember that there is a large city (Portland) about 50 miles from St. Helens. Granted, all the lava will flow out of the north end because of the shaping of the crater, if 1980 is any indication of the worst-case, Portland could experience a nice covering of volcanic ash, and the Columbia River will be getting a not-healthy dose of sulphur-laden mud.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:better mt. st. helens than mt. rainier by malf-uk · · Score: 1

      Spent a night at Paradise Lodge in July last year, absolutely gorgeous place to stay.

      I'd recommend that as one of the "must do" things when visiting the state - providing of course that doesn't start erupting during the visit.

      --
      R Tape loading error, 0:1
    3. Re:better mt. st. helens than mt. rainier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you mention tacoma. I'm moving to hill top this weekend. :) So why am I smiling? Well, on hill top you have a much better chance of getting shot than rainier getting you, and my place came with a vest :>

    4. Re:better mt. st. helens than mt. rainier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another reason Tacoma sucks.

      - Seattleite

    5. Re:better mt. st. helens than mt. rainier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your parking!

    6. Re:better mt. st. helens than mt. rainier by climbing_monkey · · Score: 1

      Its better mt. st. helens than mt. hood for all of the portland folx (i'm starting to miss living over there...damn nyc) which is much closer. and remember, seattle isn't far from tacoma and seattle is much bigger than pdx.

  27. Re:Exciting! by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

    I love the rain ... But then I live in England so that doesn't, Oh wait a minute.

  28. Related to California Quake a few days ago? by J-bob2 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I couldn't help but wonder if the two are related? Is Mt. St. Helens related to the the quake in California on Tuesday? They're in that same general fault line aren't they?

    Can anyone who knows more about Earth Science help me out here?

    1. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      I am not a seismologist or a volcanologist, but instinct tells me... no.

      ---begin speculation---
      The fact that is backing me up here is the recent 7.9 earthquake up in Alaska in 2002. Link here.. The sheer length of the break during that earthquake is staggering -- 150 miles (something like 300-odd km) of ground was shifted.

      While I am aware there are differences between tectonic movements in Alaska and plate movements on the West Coast, I still think that in order for the two to be related, seismic measurements between Mt. St. Helens and Parkside (Parkridge?) would reflect that. That's about 1,000 km. The data doesn't reflect that.

    2. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I just hope this won't trigger any activity for a Yellowstone supervolcanic eruption.

    3. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by bcarl314 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not sure if those two are related, but there was an interesting article in Scientific American a few months back that was showing a link between a large earthquack in Alaska and increased geyser eruptions in yellowstone.

      Seems an earthquake 1000s of miles away "jarred the pipes" powering the geysers in yellowstone.

      I don't suppose its out of the realm of possibility that St. Helens is related to the earthquake in CA.

    4. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by Peyna · · Score: 3, Informative

      I recall not that long ago the media tried to say that earthquakes and volcanos were related in a way that earthquakes in other parts of the world could "set off" volcanos.

      As far as I remember from a few geology classes I took in undergrad, there is no such relation. They are two very distinct processes, and while you will see a build up in "earthquakes" near a volcano prior to eruption, they're the result of pressure build up in the area, and not plates moving against each other.

      The last time Mount St. Helens blew, the side of the mountain had a considerable bulge (visible to the naked eye, I believe). The fact that this is occurring again, on a smaller scale, could either indicated simply a temporary pressure or magma build-up; or an impending eruption.

      Mount St. Helens is the result of the Juan De Fuca plate being subducted under the North American plate; a lot of heat and friction melts the rock and it pushes upwards, which causes the volcanos, and the Cascade Mountains.

      The Juan De Fuca plate is separate from the Pacific plate; which is where the San Andreas is; and the plates there are sliding against each other (mostly north/south).

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by Unkle · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, from what I remember from Geology in college, no, they are not on the same fault line. The Cascacdes (which Mt. St. Helens is a part of) are caused by the subduction fault of the Juan de Fuca plate going under the North American plate. California is home to the San Andreas fault, a transverse fault where the Pacific plate is slipping laterally past the North American plate. Also, these earthquakes are probably caused by movement of Magma within the volcano's magma chamber.

      Anyone who has had more than 2 semesters of studying these things, feel free to correct me.

      --
      Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
    6. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually as I learned from the movie 10.5, there are superfaults connecting ALL the fault lines.

    7. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by bobster45 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The answer is simply "NO!" the explanation follows: Mt. St. Helens is a by-product of subduction, where the microplate, known as the Juan de Fuca plate (a remnant of the once more huge Farralon plate) is pushed towards the American plate and since it is of a much denser material than the continental crust it is bent downwards toward the mantle of the Earth. As it subducts partial menting of the plate causes the formation and continued filling of the magma chambers and the resultant volcanics. The cause of the latest Parkfield earthquake is due to the Pacific plate slipping past the American plate in what is called "right slip strike" faulting. The terminous of the SanAndreas fault is off the coast of northern California west of Point Mendicino in a triple plate boundary that has the three plates American, Pacific and the southern portion of the Juan de Fuca plate. This is about 350 miles south of the Mt St Helens area. The only relationship between the two is that they are happening on adjacent geological plates. The phenominum that causes the earthquakes in Parkfield is not related to what is responsible for the activities in Washington. I hope this helps.

    8. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It was a scientist that said it - he took the theory as far as being able to predict eruptions months in advance, by plotting the paths of earthquakes (which in the region he was studying tended to 'cascade' triggering each other.. somewhere in greece I think).

      Seemed pretty convincing to me - he came up with a theory, proved it fitted the facts, then used it to predict a future event that wasn't supported by the other evidence.

      Whether the theory has since been disproved I don't know - this was last year and science moves quickly.

    9. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard a piece on NPR the other day, in which scientists were discussing possible links between earthquakes and oceanic activity, such as hurricanes. They were saying was that ultra-low frequency vibrations associated with earthquakes might have their origins in friction produced by large scale oceanic events (tides, storm surges, etc.), and might, in some way, be connected to siesmic activity on land. Something to do with harmonic resonances...

      Fun fact: The recent earthquake in California just happened to coincide closesly with a full moon! And east coast hurricanes!

      Kind of makes me wonder about that Navy very-low-frequency, high powered sonar stuff, too....

    10. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but there are those who think that seismic events in one location can "knock loose" seismic events in other locations, not just locally. It makes sense, actually.

      Now, we're having a Full Moon right now. So where are the links between earthquakes and full moons?

    11. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by mooman · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the California quake was action along the San Andreas fault line, occuring about 4.9 miles deep. The current seismicity at Mount St. Helens is very shallow, approximately 1/2 to 1 mile deep, and is confined almost directly to the cone itself, indicating it is probably triggered by local gas or magma action, not by any deeper seismic causes.

      The California earthquake was actually measureable throughout the entire Cascade chain, and I did some computations of the event propagation for the heck of it :

      Epicenter: 10:15:24 PDT
      San Fran: 10:16:05 (41 sec delay)
      LAS station (CA/OR border): 10:17:00 (96 sec delay)
      Three Sisters (OR mountain): 10:17:40 (136 sec delay)
      Mount Hood (OR/WA border): 10:17:45 (141 sec delay)
      Mount St. Helens: Too much local action to detect
      Mount Rainier (SE of Seattle): 10:18:20 (176 sec delay)
      Stiped Peak (Olympic Pen.): 10:18:32 (188 sec delay)
      Rockport, WA (30 mi from Canada): 10:18:40 (196 sec delay)

      So, picking two points as the earthquake epicenter and Mount Rainer based on being the ones I found very accurate Lat/Lon coordinates for, the shockwave traveled 740 miles in 176 seconds for an overall speed around 15136 MPH (approx Mach 20, depending on altitude)

      The detected signals definitely diminished the further north you traveled, but were still clearly identifiable even up to the Canadian border. But those signals were orders of magnitude less than Mt. St. Helens is generating on its own right now.

      I'm no geologist, but I live 38.4 miles from Mount St. Helens so I've recently taken up a keen interest in current events there. ;)

      --
      In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
    12. Re:Related to California Quake a few days ago? by dlt074 · · Score: 0

      yes they are! did you not see 10.0 on NBC this summer?!

  29. Updated news for my post by DarkHand · · Score: 0

    More info to add in the last few hours to my post. According to the most recent seismograph readings, it now seems that Mount Rainer is showing signs of activity as well.

    1. Re:Updated news for my post by bhima · · Score: 1
      How is that different than the normal activity?

      On the their page they say... "In an average month, 1-5 well-located, high-frequency earthquakes are recorded near the summit of Mt. Rainier. In addition, small swarms of 5-10 earthquakes over a 2-3-day time period sometimes occur. All of these earthquakes are shallow, with most locating near sea level (~4 km below the summit), and are interpreted by Moran (1997) to be occurring in response to stresses associated with the circulation of hot fluids beneath Mount Rainier. These fluids are thought to be the source for the hot springs and steam vents found at the summit and at various points within Mount Rainier National Park (e.g. Frank, 1995)."

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Updated news for my post by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      There're a whole lot more than 5-10 earthquakes on that single day graph...

    3. Re:Updated news for my post by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of them are just echoes from Mt. St. Helens - you can tell by the secondary shape at the end of the burst (different waves travel at different speeds, and the further separated they are, the further away the epicenter is...)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    4. Re:Updated news for my post by DarkHand · · Score: 1

      Nothing too far out of the ordinary, but it's interesting that the site was totally quiet during the St Helens activity. Now that the Helens activity has decreased by about 10%, Rainer has acted up a little.

    5. Re:Updated news for my post by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nothing too far out of the ordinary, but it's interesting that the site was totally quiet during the St Helens activity. Now that the Helens activity has decreased by about 10%, Rainer has acted up a little.


      I don't know what webicorder readings you've been watching, but you're reading them wrong. As St. Helens webicorders reached saturation, the Rainier ones started registering the quakes from St. Helens.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    6. Re:Updated news for my post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's different for two reasons:
      1) this is not Mt. Rainier, it's Mt. St. Helens, although they are in relatively close proximity to each other
      2) because there are now 4 per minute, or 240 per hour, which is about 11,520 for a 3 day period. Just a few more than 5-10 per day.

  30. Some people by deathcloset · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was three years old when St. Helens blew in 1980 (anyone feel old yet?).

    Our family lived in Northern Idaho, and my father likes to recount how the hardware store was full of people buying masks and resperators and whatnot. He tells of how the supermarket was jam-packed with people stockpiling for the apocalypse.

    He was getting a little nervous, but on his drive home he saw our neighbor (we lived out in the country), a farmer named Mr.Coon, just trolling about on his tractor under the bloody sun and darkened sky;doing his daily work, acting like it was just another day.

    My father was then able to relax a bit.

    1. Re:Some people by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      i was too, but i lived on the east coast. later on i moved to seattle.

      i found this vial of ash in an abandoned house once where i grew up, labelled "MT ST HELENS, 1980". i thought it was pretty neat.

    2. Re:Some people by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

      I was 10 when it blew in 1980. I don't remember much except that some people made a lot of money selling the ash as a soil supplement for gardening. One of the teachers also had gotten one of the souvenir vials of ash and was showing it off one day at school.

    3. Re:Some people by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those vials of ash were filled from the backyard of the tourist trap where it was bought for at least $5.00.

      You could have had five gallons for free from the side of the road.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    4. Re:Some people by TachyonAT · · Score: 1

      I was -3 years old... you feel old yet? :-P

    5. Re:Some people by Alomex · · Score: 1


      Amazing, mount St. Helens actually spewed perfectly formed vials of ash labelled "Mt. St. Helens, 1980" and deposited them by the side of the road.

      Nature never ceases to amaze me.

    6. Re:Some people by traveyes · · Score: 1


      I lived in Hillsboro OR at the time, I was 11. That Sunday morning rocked, cuz I didn't have to go to church. We grabbed lawn chairs and sat on our roof and watched the _enormous_ ash cloud. The next morning, we had about 1/4-1/2 inch of ash on the streets. My friend came over with his Honda CR-80 with an innertube and a rope... and we pulled each other up and down the streets, like it was snow. It was a, uh, blast.

      (then we cleaned folks' driveways for $5 a piece... and then we headed to the arcade and spent every penny)

      .

    7. Re:Some people by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      In retrospect it seems the people may have been over-reacting, but it's always the people who underestimate the severity of natural disasters that end up dying in them.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    8. Re:Some people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was 4 and I lived in Chehalis WA. We were at a park in Toledo when it blew and about the only thing I remember is singing the "I don't know where I'm a gonna go when the volcano blows" song, ash coming down like thick snow, and getting my finger stuck in my aunts towel holder. We had about 6 inches of ash at our house in Chehalis and even today you can find pockets of ash here and there.

    9. Re:Some people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in Spokane (eastern Washington) in 1980. We had 8 large trash bags full of it that we could not dispose of because the garbage workers would not pick up ash. When we moved in 1987, they were still hidden behind the garage. I still laugh everytime I see someone selling the stuff in stores and tourist areas. Up until 1993 or so, you could pick up shovel fulls of ash from I-90 around Ritzville and Moses Lake.

      Just don't breath in the ash. My brother and I though the masks were stupid looking, so we took them off when my mother wasn't looking. That night, I had the worst hacking cough of my life. Not to mention the powdery-gray snot... Still, that wasn't the stupidest things that were done.

      The news told everyone to clean the ash off the cars with a brush, not the wipers. While the Helens ash was a soft as talcum powder, it is still rock and it will scratch glass quite easily. Also, some people got the bright idea to wash it off the roofs with water. Unfortunately, volcanic ash and water form a good approximation of wet concrete. Many gutters were ripped from houses by the weight of the watered ash.

      Good times...

    10. Re:Some people by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      let me reiterate that i have lived in western washington, but did not purchase said ash. i found it.

      neat stories tho :)

    11. Re:Some people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't even an idea in 1980. Five years later, though...

      Do YOU feel old? :P

    12. Re:Some people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, now I feel old with you. I was 2, and I lived in Yakima. I vaguely remember seeing the ash falling from the sky, and having a hard time finding my way back to the sliding glass door going inside my house. But, as with all such childhood memories, I might've made it up in my own mind. I mean, I was 2! Wouldn't my parents have grabbed me as soon as they heard? Got me inside?

      Regardless, I was in Yakima for that eruption, and my family has a vial. But, even more interesting, was the time I visited in 1986 (I was 8), and I do remember the neighborhood where my grandma lived. Every front yard seemed to have a section devoted to ash. My grandma had a strip next to her driveway, because I remember her yelling at me for playing in it. :)

    13. Re:Some people by portforward · · Score: 1

      I was 7 and lived in Bremerton Washington which is to the west of Seattle accross the Puget Sound. I believe it was a Sunday and we got a phone call saying that church was canceled. I remember a grey morning and the TV said not to go outside, and that those masks really didn't do a whole lot for you. It was really scary to see those famous photographs of the mountain blowing out and the crazy mud flows (lahars?) coming off the mountain the next couple of days. A year or two later we were having a barbeque and saw a mushroom cloud to the south east. I don't know if they were teasing me or not, but the adults said that that was from St Helens.

  31. I was born while it was erupting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was born in Tacoma Washington while the volcano was erupting, which has earned me a lot of jokes along the lines of "You sure came into the world with a bang." Now that it may erupt again I wonder if that is a good luck sign for me or bad. Since it erupted when I was born will its next eruption be an omen of my death? I just started medical school, so maybe since the previous eruption signified the beginning of my life this eruption will signify the beginning of my professional life.

    Or maybe I think too much. :P

  32. Re:Exciting! by SFBwian · · Score: 1

    I love tornadoes... but then I live on the east coa--Oh shit, we're back where we started.

    --
    I'm looking to get rich. I've got steps #2 (????) and #3 (PROFIT!) planned out, but am having trouble coming up with #1.
  33. The end is near by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 5, Funny

    By an interesting coincidence, I was born near Mt. St. Helens during the first eruption. Yes...as I was delivered from the womb, the city was covered with ash and filled with the sounds of weeping and gnashing of teeth *cough* I mean, sweeping and washing of streets.

    Maybe with this next eruption, instead of merely being born, I'll actually get a life.

    1. Re:The end is near by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      Either that or it will kill you.

      /me says that from Central Washington, with plenty of fear of my own.

    2. Re:The end is near by tenaciousj · · Score: 1

      Do you have any special powers?

    3. Re:The end is near by Forbman · · Score: 1

      my niece was born in Ellensburg, WA, on May 22, 1980... It was still dark as night 4 days after there.

  34. Due to severe slashdot effect... by thrill12 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...our scientists are no longer able to monitor and analyze any vulcanic activity online.
    Folks: you're on your own.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Due to severe slashdot effect... by kzinti · · Score: 1

      ...our scientists are no longer able to monitor and analyze any vulcanic activity online.

      Not to worry. Vulcan has returned to his perch and we are not expecting more vulcanic activity any time soon.

    2. Re:Due to severe slashdot effect... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      That might explain that "I'm a Volcanologist, if you see this van breaking away ay high speed, try to keep up" bumper stickers on some pretty fast moving trucks in Route 504...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Due to severe slashdot effect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You got "You're" and "your" both right. First time on the internet?

  35. Alert Levels by F7F7NoYes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have we positively ruled out terrorism as a cause of this seismic activity at this point?

    1. Re:Alert Levels by PriceIke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not yet. In fact, certain congressional Democrats are "very concerned" that putting out these volcano warnings are just Republican scare-tactics. John Kerry (D-Mass) issued a statement this morning saying "Mt. St. Helens is angry, because the earth is angry at President Bush's failed environmental policies .."

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    2. Re:Alert Levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed we have ruled out terrorism, instead, it is being treated as a sign that our god wants more violence to reign down on our enemies.

      Our god is demonstrating the power that it wants to smite our adverseries.

      Our god is unhappy with our lack of devotion to the war against the anti-christ.

      Our god wants blood.

      Our god is angry.

      Our god WILL be appeased.

    3. Re:Alert Levels by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Have we positively ruled out terrorism as a cause of this seismic activity at this point?

      Yes, but I'm not so sure that they've fully addressed the possibility it all being this guy's work.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    4. Re:Alert Levels by gavbaa · · Score: 1

      Sweet, 7th Guest sig. Not a week goes by where I don't get an excuse to use "I'm going to have to start again".

      I just re-finished 11th Hour a month ago. Good lord that pente game is hard the second time around, when you don't get to start.

      But nothing compared to the microscope puzzle. The bastard that programmed that game deserves an award for best computer opponent I've ever seen.

    5. Re:Alert Levels by Marty_Krapturd · · Score: 1

      Well, if it is related to terrorist activity, we'd best NOT try and negotiate with them. That might give them the indication that they have a point, which in turn might validate their way of life *shudder*. 'Everything must be this way'

    6. Re:Alert Levels by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      Bush just annocued with Saddam out of power he's going after another terrorist with WMD.. Mother Nature.. Sounds like an Onion article to me

  36. Re:Exciting! by fracai · · Score: 0

    I love tornadoes ... but then I live on the moon so they won't directly affect me :).

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  37. Prank Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There will be a big white flag coming out of the crater reading "BOOM!" any minute now...

    1. Re:Prank Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prank volcano events happened annualy just outside of Albuqurque, New Mexico. It was a favorite ploy of highschoolers to gather a bunch of junk (tires seemed to be the best) in the old craters and light them on fire.

  38. Someone take pictures of the near area before by invisik · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having never been there myself, it would be cool to see before and after shots of the area in the event of an eruption. Any one out there listening?

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
    1. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by bhima · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The before & after shots of the 1980 eruption were nothing short of stuning. They had a slow motion film at school that also was amazing.

      So hopefully this potential eruption will be better covered and less harmful.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by Sam+Treadwell · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I hiked there about 2 weeks ago, on Boundary Trail #1 and 207a, which runs along the base of the mountain and Spirit Lake. Got some great photos. Sometimes it is great living near a volcano. heh.

      Here is a fairly large panoramic we took that day. You can see Johnston Ridge Observatory on the far right. The trail actually takes you across the ridges on the left and then drops you down in to the flats at the base of the mountain:

      http://home.pacifier.com/~richmond/Helens.jpg

    3. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by invisik · · Score: 1

      Wow! That's some amazing scenery. And a cool panoramic picture, too. Thanks for sharing that.

      What's that structure on the far right?

      -m

      --
      http://www.invisik.com
    4. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by omicronish · · Score: 1

      Cool, I want to go on that trail. Anyone want to come with me?

    5. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by Sam+Treadwell · · Score: 1

      That is the Observatory. Pretty neat place to visit. They have a nice movie theater type thing where you can watch a movie about St. Helens and the eruption, and at the end, there is a cool visual, but I won't spoil it by posting it.

      I go up there a couple of times a year just for fun. The trails are fantastic, but they are very strict about not wandering off the trail, so you have to be somewhat careful.

    6. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the bunker where the Federation is monitoring us, except for some reason the camera sees through the cloaking field. Any minute now, Data is going to step through and go crazy.

    7. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1

      (OT) Any way someone could get a desktop-sized rendering of that?

    8. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by goodydot · · Score: 1

      Wow. You can see the smaller 'bubble' that's formed within the crater of the old 'bubble.' Really shows you how much smaller this one will be, and how huge the old eruption was. Nice picture.

    9. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by John+Newman · · Score: 1

      Great shot. I walked that trail two summers ago, it was probably the most awesome (as in awe-insiring) scenery I've ever seen. I also remember that I was way too chicken-shit to follow the trail the full length of Johnston ridge. :)

      Everyone can see the trail winding off into the distance on the left side of the picture. Then you see the enormous, blackend and scarred, barren ridge that juts out the left, towards Mt. St. Helens? And how there's a little white horizontal scrape about 4/5 of the way up that ridge, that looks like part of the sendimentation pattern of the rock? Nope, that's the trail. Two feet across, covered in loose tock, literally scraped into the side a cliff and hugging it all the way around that jutting ridge. I got about a hundred feet along it and decided the other half of the trail must not be nearly as interesting as the first half.

    10. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't know how to resize a JPG by now, you're probably still using 800x600 as a desktop size and no one wants to waste time shrinking it that small.

    11. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by Skidge · · Score: 1

      I visited Mt. St. Helens about a year ago with my family. Unfortunately, the crater was obscured by clouds during most of our visit. I did get some nice pictures, regardless. Here's a link to a few of them:

      Mt. St. Helens Pictures

      You can still see large areas of trees knocked down and huge stumps left from when the trunks were snapped off like twigs.

    12. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by Sam+Treadwell · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct. It is also kinda washed out in a couple of spots where water has run down the ridge, so you have to jump about a foot or two. Not exactly fun, as it is straight down if you slip. :)

    13. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      What I find amazing is that that observatory sits on Johnson ridge 5 miles from the volcano, yet when it erupted the mudflow and debris shot through that valley and launched itself over that ridge like a kid going off a skateboard ramp.

    14. Re:Someone take pictures of the near area before by greggle · · Score: 1

      Darn -- you were almost over the scary part. The trail gets much better, with quite a bit more nice views.

      It's only real scary for about 500 feet.

      Amazing views of Spirit Lake were just around the corner.

      gregg

      --
      Work Hard, Rock Hard, Eat Hard, Sleep Hard, Grow Big, Wear Glasses if You Need 'Em.
  39. No... by Mz6 · · Score: 1

    Sunrise was at 6:07.. as I said above.. It's probably cloudy at that elevation... or it's raining :)

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or the volcano (and the camera) is gone.

    2. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, sunrise is at 7:07. You're forgetting daylight saving time.

  40. oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess I should put off moving to Seattle then, eh?

    1. Re:oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In VOLCANIC AMERICA, Seattle moves to you!

  41. /. pwns you by Southpaw018 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google news summary:
    News results for mount st. helens - View today's top stories
    Mount St. Helens Alert Status Increased - Slashdot - 9 minutes ago
    Experts Predict Mount St. Helens Eruption - ABC News - 10 minutes ago

    Yes, that's right. /. beat ABC news to the story. Take that!

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    1. Re:/. pwns you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhm, 10 minutes ago is *before* 9 minutes ago. Do I need to draw you a diagram?

    2. Re:/. pwns you by Southpaw018 · · Score: 3, Funny

      *hangs his head*
      Serves me right for trying to score some karma points when I've been awake for 10 minutes.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    3. Re:/. pwns you by RPI+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Google news summary:
      News results for mount st. helens - View today's top stories
      Mount St. Helens Alert Status Increased - Slashdot - 9 minutes ago
      Experts Predict Mount St. Helens Eruption - ABC News - 10 minutes ago
      Yes, that's right. /. beat ABC news to the story. Take that!


      Good to know that other /. readers can actually do math...

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    4. Re:/. pwns you by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Google news summary:
      News results for mount st. helens - View today's top stories
      Mount St. Helens Alert Status Increased - Slashdot - 9 minutes ago
      Experts Predict Mount St. Helens Eruption - ABC News - 10 minutes ago

      Yes, that's right. /. beat ABC news to the story. Take that!


      MSNBC posted this story yesterday.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    5. Re:/. pwns you by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, if I reported it *now* I could beat them both!

      Sorry, couldn't resist...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    6. Re:/. pwns you by Murgatroyd · · Score: 1

      Google news summary:
      News results for mount st. helens - View today's top stories
      Mount St. Helens Alert Status Increased - Slashdot - 9 minutes ago
      Experts Predict Mount St. Helens Eruption - ABC News - 10 minutes ago

      Yes, that's right. /. beat ABC news to the story. Take that!


      That would be even funnier if it was true. "10 minutes ago" is earlier than "9 minutes ago", in most parts of the universe.

    7. Re:/. pwns you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably, you missed the math tutorial, "negative numbers and their magical properties".

    8. Re:/. pwns you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, well, I got a laugh out of it. Thanks. :)

    9. Re:/. pwns you by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Pfft! That's nothing. I saw this story on Fark yesterday!

    10. Re:/. pwns you by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      So?? My local news reported this story last weekend. Of course, my house is 30 miles from the Volcano, so there might be a little bias on their part.

  42. fleas ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    All of these hurricanes, tornadoes earthquakes, floods, and now volcano eruptions...when do the plagues and locusts start happening?

    We got lotsa fleas around here ... I think I'd prefer locusts ...

  43. Breaking News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bush declares the volcano part of the "Axis of Lava", declares "War on Volcanos" and sends bombers to the area to eliminate the threat.

  44. Re:Exciting! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1, Funny
    Man, way to start a flame war.

    Or would that be a magma flow war?

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  45. Nothing to worry about! by Mz6 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's just Mother Nature shaking up her chocolate milk.

    --
    Hmmm.
  46. Quake Depths by unknowns · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here are a few plots that show the recent earthquakes vs. depth and location.

    I think they color the recent quakes red to scare the bejesus out of everyone, but the average depth over the past month is still much closer to the surface than normal.

    --
    Even blind squirrels find nuts now and then.
  47. The Transformers are waking up! by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new Decepticon overlords.

    -Stephen

    1. Re:The Transformers are waking up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no...

      It's the Space Giants living in that volcano.

  48. VolcanoCam is slashdotted by ObjetDart · · Score: 1
    "The file you requested is temporarily unavailable. Please check back in a few minutes."

    Let the "the server melted" and "I guess they needed a better firewall" jokes begin...

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
  49. http://www.fs.fed.us/gpnf/volcanocams/msh/archive/ by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    It probably is the clouds ... the cam can't see through fog or clouds, and cannot compensate for low light-conditions...

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  50. Media coverage... by Aceto3for5 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You know that news outlets around the country are hard at work making the on screen volcano graphics, lining up siesmologists, and all the siesmologists are picking out ties to look nice for TV. News writers are looking up lava, volcano, and erupt in the thesaurus. I dunno, maybe im too cynical for my own good. I cant help but think, people die in these sort of things. It is interesting scientifically, and historically, but if I see one flashy graphic on fox or msnbc like "Fire in the hole", "Go with the flow", or "Magma-nificent" Im gonna go back to reading books.

    1. Re:Media coverage... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      It is interesting scientifically, and historically, but if I see one flashy graphic on fox or msnbc like "Fire in the hole", "Go with the flow", or "Magma-nificent" Im gonna go back to reading books.

      Just wait until you see these then when it finally goes...

      Red Hot Moneyshot!
      Ejaculation!
      Pyroclastic Diahrrea!
      Baking Soda + Vinegar!

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:Media coverage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you don't read books because you find the current state of news media satisfying? WTF?!

  51. Re:mod 3own by bp2179 · · Score: 0

    someone make sure this fool is checking out the lava dome when it blows

  52. Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Informative

    Subduction zones (like those off the west coast of America) and volcanoes (such as St. Helens) are a big part of the long-term carbon cycle of the planet. Left to its own, life and chemical processes on this planet would convert all the atmospheric carbon into calcium carbonate that would be trapped in rock on the bottom of the ocean. Subduction zones and volcanoes reprocess this rock into CO2.

    Once the Earth's crust cools enough, it will lock up and stop the cycle and CO2 will inexorable drop in concentration. I can't remember when this is predicted to happen, but I believe it is scheduled to occur before the Sun becomes a red giant. Of course, I'm sure our descendants (assuming we have them) will invent their own C02 extract factories to keep the Earth nicely carbonated when the time comes.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by Spam.B.gone · · Score: 0

      I'm sure our descendants (assuming we have them) will invent their own C02 extract factories to keep the Earth nicely carbonated when the time comes.

      Think of our children! Burn more oil!

    2. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate when my carbonated planet goes flat...

    3. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure our descendants (assuming we have them) will invent their own CO2 extract factories to keep the Earth nicely carbonated when the time comes.

      Already done... it's called EXHALING!

    4. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by bshroyer · · Score: 1

      I've got my own CO2 extract factories; they're parked in my garage.

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    5. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by bobster45 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This sound like nonsense to me. First there are forest fires that dump billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, add to this the fossil fuel consumption from industrialized nations and this information about what will happen if volcanoes stop becomes even more laughable. Folks, there is a much higher probability of our environment becoming akin to that of Venus which is hot enough to melt lead because of the huge increase in CO2 caused by man. The carbon cycle will be continuing free of subduction processes' influences. What we really might want to consider is the mechanism for re-sequestration of CO2 is by 2 sources, photsynthesis by plants ability to lock up CO2 in sugars by using the sun's light energy and biotic action in the formation of limestone by mollusks and the like. Man's influence on the atmosphere is tangile and measurable. We have scientific data that confirms this as incontravertable. As for the geologic process having much to do with the carbon cycle, I believe we have little to concern ourselves with. Man's influence far out shadows any geological process that might cause fluctuation of CO2.

    6. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by cephyn · · Score: 1

      you keep your lungs in your garage?

      weird. I keep mine in my chest cavity. seems more efficient to me...

      --
      Moo.
    7. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      +137, Funny.

      This is the first LOL experience I've had on /. in months. Thanks.

    8. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot. He was talking about long-term geological processes, not thousands of years. You'd think someone like yourself would be able to understand that given the level of language in your reply, but its fairly evident you simply have an agenda you feel compelled to push. Get some common sense please, and out of your fucking ivory tower. Good day.

    9. Re:Be afraid if the volcanoes ever stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, I'm sure our descendants (assuming we have them) will invent their own C02 extract factories to keep the Earth nicely carbonated when the time comes.


      Yes, they're called Hummers and SUVs.
  53. You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by RCulpepper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google 'Yellowstone volcano.' In one of the two or three times I favored my intro to geology class with my presence, my professor explained that much of Yellowstone National Park is the caldera of a giant volcano, according to him the largest on earth, hence the geysers and sulfurous springs. If it were to erupt again -- fortunately it does so rarely, about once every 600k years -- it would cover most of the Western US in ash and if it did so without warning, would kill millions of people.

    --
    Always a godfather; never a god. -Gore Vidal
    1. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Indeed! The Science Channel occasionally shows an hour episode of reserch done on this, along with some history of past eruptions.


      Pretty fascinating, and scary, stuff. Apparently, some believe the last eruption brought the number of humans on Earth down to the thousands.

    2. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by xtal · · Score: 4, Funny

      If Yellowstone blows, you should be studying theology, not geology. :-)

      --
      ..don't panic
    3. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by jonr · · Score: 1

      Either that, or Bush wins the elections...

    4. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by pommaq · · Score: 1

      Dude, you said "Caldera". Not afraid of your karma, are you?

    5. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by SsShane · · Score: 1

      According to Bill Bryson(sp), who stayed in a Holiday Inn last night, it's last eruption was 620k years ago.

    6. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awww great!
      getting popcorn already!

    7. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by Peyna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      USGS info on the Yellowstone Volcano.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. It's a beautiful site, worth the time for a first visit to a .is domain.

      I hope it isn't too late already to get that damn dam construction stopped.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    9. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by hackstraw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If it were to erupt again -- fortunately it does so rarely, about once every 600k years -- it would cover most of the Western US in ash and if it did so without warning, would kill millions of people.

      Bush: Quick! Lets remove that Mother Nature from power in the name of the War on Terror! She might use her weapons of mass destruction on us sometime in the next 600,000 years.

      Cheney: Dumbass, there's no profit in that. (shakes his head and thinks to himself "No wonder this guy needed people to buy out his companies and give him jobs")

    10. Re:You think Mt. St. Helens was big... by glsunder · · Score: 1

      It's a monster. According to a Map of Yellowstone, the caldera rim is about 40 miles wide.

  54. Severity from a local by medscaper · · Score: 4, Informative

    They had some comments on the local news this morning about its severity. (I live in Vancouver - just a short drive from St. Helens.) It looks like the only thing they're predicting is a very small eruption, possible steam escapes. Nothing at all like the last one.

    The only problem they expect is the possibility of dispruping flights at PDX or some of the local airports.

    Contrary to the last eruption, when 57 people died, no one lives up around the volcano anymore. So, it's not like anything nearly as severe is likely.

    So, even though activity is through the roof, they don't expect more than a small eruption. Even last time, here in Vancouver, we didn't get much activity at all. All the ash, darkness and horrid weather was thrown to the east of the Cascades, near Yakima and Central Washington. The rivers were flooded and clogged with debris, but other than the immediate vicinity, no one was hurt.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  55. Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens? by amichalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When up on Mt. Rainier (over looks Seattle) we were told by guides that Mt. Rainier was a much larger active volcano with far more devistating potential than St. Helens because of both it's size and proximity to Seattle.

    Does the activity at St. Helens make Mt. Rainier and more or less likely to also erupt?

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  56. Tonight during the debate... by Darkstar9969 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Bush will blame the eruption on Al Qaeda and send National Guard troops to Washington state then completely fail to find any lava of mass destruction.

    --
    MMMmmmmmm....erotic cakes!!! Homer J. Simpson - Treehouse of Horror VI
  57. Oh no!!! by Pizaz · · Score: 0

    ...godzirra is trying to break free!

  58. Comparisons of the 1980 eruption with others by Purifier · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/msh/comparisons. html "Whoever wins, we lose..." ;)

  59. Lahars by esoterus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the more reassuring things about St Helens blowing is that it has already done so. It has a nice crater to keep things fairly contained and no glaciers. Mt Rainier is another story, however. It is also a volcano, has the most permanent glaciers on it of any mountain in the continental US and if it blows, the true danger is what happens to those glaciers at eruption. It's known as a lahar.

    I read something similar to this once: To get an idea of a lahar, imagine a 30 ft wall of mud, boiling in temperature with the consistency of wet cement traveling at speeds up to 60 mph or so. If you go driving through the river valleys of Washington State (Carbon Rv, Puyallup Rv) that are fed by the Rainier glaciers, you'll see Lahar evacuation route signs everywhere. Not only that, but I believe recent evacuation simulations have been abysmal. Scary stuff.

    Ahh, may have found the article that I read.

    --
    Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen. -Hawking
    1. Re:Lahars by artaxerxes · · Score: 1

      Having just returned Herculaneum, I have a damn good idea what a lahar would do to you!

      60ft of once boiling mud preserving an AD79 noble resort town (population ~5000). Just down the road from the more famous Pompeii (and tourist inundated) which was buried in Ash (population ~15000).

      It's wonderful.

      --
      man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren
    2. Re:Lahars by artaxerxes · · Score: 1

      http://www.educeth.ch/stromboli/perm/vesuv/history -en.html

      Ooops missed the linky for Herculaneum.

      --
      man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren
    3. Re:Lahars by robsimmon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In 2002 a massive lahar/avalanche slid down the flanks of a dormant volcano in Russia, killing 125 people. ~135 million cubic meters of ice and rock, moving at 180 kph.

      Collapse of the Kolka Glacier

    4. Re:Lahars by robsimmon · · Score: 1

      Detailed info about the lahar that buried Herculaneum: Lahars in Campania

      On the other hand, vesuvius destroyed Pompeii with a nuée ardente (glowing avalanche) and pyroclastic flow, not a lahar. A lahar is a mixture of water, mud, rocks, and possibly ice. A nuée ardente is a cloud of volcanic gasses and ash so hot they glow. When the ash comes to a rest, it is often so hot the individual particles fuse to become solid rock. A pyroclasitc flow is a mixture of gasses, ash, pumice, glass (obsidian) shards, and rock flowing down the side of a volcano.

      Volcanic and Geologic Terms

    5. Re:Lahars by mangu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The worst lahar in the last few centuries happened in Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia in 1985. 23000 people died when the town of Armero was buried under the mud flow.

    6. Re:Lahars by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      Mt. St. Helens does not have a nice crater, in the Crater Lake sense. The Mt. St. Helens crater is open on the north side, so everything could just flow right out (see this picture from the south side of the rim). The crater is full of snow as well (which is hard to tell from that picture, because the snow is covered in ash), which would contribute to lahars. I also believe there are still glaciers on Mt. St. Helens, but obviously not of the number and size present on Rainier (which is visible in the above picture behind Spirit Lake; Mt. Adams [yet another volcano] is visible to the far right).

    7. Re:Lahars by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Most of the realistic evacuation scenarios involve having to comandeer every cargo freighter up and down the coast and sending them all into Puget sound to offload people - it's a high-bandwith, but high-latency solution to getting people out (as opposed to using planes, trains, or automobiles, which is low-latency, but low bandwith). The problem is mostly social rather than technical. For the plan to work, people have to be panicked enough to follow it a few weeks before the explosion, and that includes companies allowing their ships to be comandeered for this purpose, and residents willingly leaving town, all based on the warnings of a few scientists that the eruption is likely but not guaranteed to happen in a couple of weeks.

      The big problem with the evacuation is that by the time the need for it is 100% certain, it's too late to execute it, and you don't want to evacuate hundreds of thousands of people unless you really know you need to.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  60. It's overcast out by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    I live in Tieton, WA (near Yakima, WA, which is somewhat close to M. St. Helens); it's very grey out right now, but that's because of clouds I believe (it's certainly too early for ash.)

    It's possible that camera is just pointing skyward and seeing a blue tinted overcast day... but I don't think so.

    1. Re:It's overcast out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or the volcano erupted purple.

  61. "now, if you look at the charts" by ObjetDart · · Score: 0
    Excuse me, but that page is fucking cool.

    This is what I'd like to see, more scientists making more fun plots and graphs like this for me to look at.

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
  62. Volcano alert system: Levels 1 to 3 by earthforce_1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Products/Warn/WarnScheme s.html

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  63. its time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time to take things up a notch...
    BAM!

  64. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    War, Famine, Death and ... Flu.

    1. Re:The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse ... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh, yeah, a little flu is nothing to worry about!

      (I found it kind of scary that they said that the virus was probably still extant in the bodies, and that researchers were going to dig them up to get samples.)

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  65. Re:Curious by Lonath · · Score: 1

    I know Folorida pissed some higher being off, Butwhat did the state of washington do ?

    Maybe This?

    (OK this post is blatant !MS flamebait /. karma whoring, I admit it. Moderate accordingly.)

  66. Too soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The area has not had time to replenish its stock of stubborn old men who repeat the mantra "I've lived here nigh on 50 years and it ain't killed me!" to passing geologists attempting to evacuate them.

    If it does blow up, where will our schadenfreude come from?

    1. Re:Too soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey mod this up +funny

  67. Obvious Jimmy Buffet time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Volcano
    By: jimmy buffett, keith sykes, harry dailey
    1979
    Chorus:
    Now I don't know - I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    Chorus:
    Let me say now I don't know - I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    Ground she's movin' under me - Tidal waves out on the sea
    Sulphur smoke up in the sky - Pretty soon we learn to fly

    Chorus:
    Let me hear ya now I don't know - I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    Now my girl quickly say to me - Mon you better watch your feet
    Lava come down soft and hot - You better lava me now or lava me not

    Chorus:
    Let me say now I don't know - I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    -- spoken: mr utley...

    No time to count what I'm worth - 'cause I just left the planet earth
    Where I go I hope there's rum - Not to worry mon soon come

    Chorus:
    Now I don't know - I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    Chorus:
    One more now I don't know (ah he don't know) - I don't know (he don't know, mon)
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    But I don't want to land in new york city - Don't want to land in mexico (no no no)
    Don't want to land on no three mile island - Don't want to see my skin aglow (no no no)

    Don't want to land in commanche sky park - Or in nashville, tennessee (no no no)
    Don't want to land in no san juan airport - Or the yukon territory (no no no)

    Don't want to land no san diego - Don't want to land in no buzzards bay (no no no)
    Don't want to land on no ayotollah - I got nothing more to say

    Chorus:
    I don't know - I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    Chorus:
    Just a one more, I don't know (he don't know) - I don't know (I don't know, man)
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go - When the volcano blow

    PS - cavia procellus - how are things going?

  68. Any other boys from Longview area by boskone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I clearly remember 1980. It was pretty neat and scary. Although it happened on Sunday, so we didn't get that day off of school. I think school was closed for several days afterwards. Some tidbits that you may find boring or interesting...

    Ash was so fine (there was several inches on the street) that it would ruin your engine. So everyone put women's pantyhose over their air cleaners to keep the dirt out. Also the local timber company bought out the auto parts stores of all the extra air cleaners to keep their trucks moving.

    people kept emergency supplies in their car trunks for years after that. probably until 86 or 87

    Also, their were some great slogans on bumper stickers and t-shirts that we'll revive if necessary.

    "Mt St. Helen's lost her ash in 1980, I saved mine."

    Plus the song about harry truman was popular.

    wow, amazing what you can remember...

    1. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from Longview... up in Seattle now but graduated class of '99 from Mark Morris. (Longview for the non-locals is the closest "major" city to St. Helens.

    2. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by boskone · · Score: 1

      RA Long, '91 Working in Seattle now as well. Not a lot of computer stuff in LV.

    3. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by Lowridah · · Score: 1

      I'm from Amboy, real close. I remember being 3, my mom saw it blew and put me on the counter frantically calling family members saying "it blew its top!" because we were able to see it very well from our place. This is one of my absolute earliest memories.

    4. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born in Longview, and I'm just old enough to remember camping and fishing up around Spirit Lake. I had a cousin or uncle or something who had a cabin up on the Toutle River, we used to visit in the summer.

      I was in Vancouver when the eruption happened, watching the mushroom cloud through a big north-facing picture window. That view was never the same.

    5. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by pinchhazard · · Score: 0

      I was born in 1984 in Seattle, so my recollection of the event is, well, negative. However, my family has a few hundred acre farm up Columbia Heights Road. The farm was covered in a sheet of dust and the sky grew dark.

      I grew up hearing about the eruption and its effects on the town (and of course about Harry Truman.)

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    6. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So everyone put women's pantyhose over their air cleaners to keep the dirt out.

      ...as opposed to men's pantyhose?

    7. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by adpowers · · Score: 1

      If it spews ash again, it will highly devalue those little containers of ash they sell at gift shops. My parents saved a huge container from when it erupted. If we put it into a whole bunch of little containers and sold them, we could probably make a few hundred bucks :).

    8. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by myste_it · · Score: 1

      I grew up in St. Helens and live there still... NOT the mountain, the small town about halfway between Longview and Portland on the Columbia river. Also not far from Trojan Nuclear Power plant in Rainier. We have a pretty good view of the mountain there on clear days. I personally am looking forward to the eruption, as I was only 1 month old when it blew last time.

    9. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What, did they not have washable air filters in 1980? K&N makes quality washable filters and sells cleaning kits. You wash the filter with a soap solution that comes in a spray bottle, then let it air dry, and spray it with oil. If you were careful and kept the pressure down or the distance up, you could clean them with compressed air, which they specifically tell you not to do. They cost 5-10 times as much as a normal filter but with proper maintenance they're warrantied for a million miles.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      someone has never been to San Francisco...or the East village.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    11. Re:Any other boys from Longview area by nyrk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am from the area, and remeber it vividly. In Elementry school, when we went outside, we had to wear dust masks, and could only play on the concrete area of the playground, because that was all they could get clean. They later removed all the barkdust, and replaced it with new clean barkdust before we could go back on.

      Our family owned some beachfront property on the Toutle River, which is on the Mt. St. Hellens watershed. The mud choked up the river for years, and it was probably 1995 before the beach began to look like it did before the mountain blew.

      The ash and mud would make a jelly-like quicksand on the banks of the river with a thick, flexable layer on the top. You could walk (run, bounce, jump) on the top withoug breaking through until enough water worked into the top layer, then you would break through and sink up to your thighs. Neat stuff, we played in it for years.

  69. Re:Exciting! by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

    I love Topic Drift, but I'm a Slashdot user.....

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
  70. I never thought I'd see the day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    that Condelezza Rice would be trolling webforums.... Quite a step a up.

  71. Real Horsemen by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

    War, Famine, Death and the IRS

  72. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by redbaron7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Although both Mt Rainier, Mt St Helens, and all the other dormant and volcanoes in Washington and Oregon are due to the same subduction zone; an eruption at Mt St Helens will not influence Rainier in any way.

    The USGS is currently predicting a high likelihood of Rainier experiencing a small eruption in the next 50 years. This will melt Rainier's icecap and produce lahar flows (heavy, fast mud flows - these will take out bridges and buildings). The outskirts of Seattle are built on the deposits of old lahars from Rainier...

    Early this year, a warning system (a bit like the tsunami system in the Pacific) has been put in place between Rainier and Seattle. This should give warning of lahars as they start. This could give enough warning to get people out of valley bottoms, etc - but how much of the populace knows what a lahar is and what the danger is???

    Incidentally, a couple of days ago, I plotted the ongoing Mt St Helens earthquake swarm on some earthquake hazard maps and put the results here.

    Richard (yes I was a seismologist 10 years ago)
  73. As soon as by telly333 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Bush gets re-elected

  74. Yellowstone is dying by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

    Yellowstone National Park is the caldera of a giant volcano

    Yellowstone = Caldera = Sco = stolen BSD code = BSD is dying. Transitive property of equality states that Yellowstone is indeed dying (in a giant volcano)...BYE Darl

  75. Karl Rove is responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Karl Rove's doing just to get the news off of the Iraqi clusterfuck and as insurance in case Dubya drools tonight.

  76. A problem that Slashdotters can conquer! by Conspir8or · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly, Mt. St. Helens is near eruption because it is starved for virgin sacrifices!

    1. Re:A problem that Slashdotters can conquer! by bcemoli · · Score: 1

      In that case we just need to ship a random sampling of /. readers up to Washington.

    2. Re:A problem that Slashdotters can conquer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful +3, it is? Should that be not a +3 Funny? Confused, Yoda has become.

  77. Dont forget the coralized webcam by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 1

    come on, be kind:

    --
    tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
    1. Re:Dont forget the coralized webcam by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 1
      --
      tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
  78. You know you're doomed when... by leftie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I did Hurricanes Camille, Agnes, and Hugo on the East Coast. I've done tornadoes and blizzards in Michigan. I was in LA for huge brush and forest fires, the Rodney King riots, and the Northridge Quake. I now live in Portland, OR. Yea.

    On the "harbingers of doom" ratings scale, hearing I'm moving to town is like running into Jim Cantore in a hotel lobby.

    1. Re:You know you're doomed when... by switcha · · Score: 1
      Please take a short vacation. Matt Zaffino says if it can just keep from blowing for the next day we won't get caught in the ash fallout.

      Perhaps time for a little trip to Pendelton or something?

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    2. Re:You know you're doomed when... by kf6auf · · Score: 1

      You are aware that there is a nuclear power plant on property owned by Camp Pendelton? Please stay away. Go to Hawaii or something.

    3. Re:You know you're doomed when... by superflippy · · Score: 1

      ...like running into Jim Cantore in a hotel lobby.

      When watching the 6:30 news earlier this week, I noticed that the reporter NBC assigned to this story was dressed in hiking gear and reporting from the mountain itself (as opposed to voicing over from the studio). At that point, there had only been a mention of increased activity but NBC were clearly not taking any chances - if something was likely to explode, they wanted to be there.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    4. Re:You know you're doomed when... by cephyn · · Score: 1

      right, because being near an explosion is standard procedure to not take chances.

      --
      Moo.
    5. Re:You know you're doomed when... by Actionable+Mango · · Score: 1

      Are you writing this from Iraq?

  79. Re:Born to love Volcanoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just going to tell you this once, son: If you want to keep working here...stay off the drugs.

  80. Re:I suggest by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

    canada?

    --
    please me, have no regrets.
  81. Volcano news site by BC+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm surprised no one has posted it yet, but John Seach's Volcano-Live site has a lot of good and timely volcano info. Go to the breaking news section for continuous bits about St. Helens.

    Seach runs chartered volcano tours and has amassed quite a collection of pics which are up on the site too.

  82. According to the latest... by ejbvanc · · Score: 2, Informative

    it has increased to beyond 3.0 quakes now. Check out: http://www.pnsn.org/HELENS/mshrec_eqs.html and get the most up-to-date list.

  83. Strange Coincidence... by mpath · · Score: 2, Funny
    I was reading the latest book from Patrick Robinson (Scimitar SL-2) and the gist of the book is that terrorists are going around exploding cruise missles (from a nuclear sub) into volcanoes, making them erupt, causing terror/destruction, etc and they first warmed up with making Mount Saint Helens erupt. Their end-goal was to erupt some island volcano (Cumbre Vieja) out in the North Atlantic, causing huge tsunamis to wipe out the entire East Coast of the US, plus some in the UK/Europe, too.

    The descriptions of the tsunamis were incredible (I know it's a fiction book, but still...): 100 ft. high waves travelling at high speeds, one after another. Sure, some buildings may survive one of those, but several?

    Good book, but had to give it back to the library before I could finish it.

    --
    I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
    1. Re:Strange Coincidence... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The only problem I see with this sort of fictional concept is that most people writing such stories don't have a clue about the sheer amount of energy released by one of these events.

      The most you could do with some sort of bomb is speed events up, and at most only by a day or two at that. At other times of the life cycle of a volcano, I doubt that even exploding a nuke would be able to trigger an eruption. Keep in mind that even the comparatively minor eruption of Mount St. Helens (which was even less than Mt. Pinatubo in the Phillipines) was a couple of orders of magnitude more explosive than the bomb on Hiroshima. Except for the radioactive junk from the bomb, you wouldn't have even noticed anything different had a nuke gone off during the eruption.

      On the flip side of this, I also don't think that you could stop one of these eruptions even if you tried either. Drilling wells or somehow "cooling off" a volcano isn't going to work either. Mainly, if it is going to blow, it will, and it is simply best if you move and get away from the darned thing unless you are trying to commit suicide.

    2. Re:Strange Coincidence... by mpath · · Score: 1

      You're probably right, but once you emerse yourself in the book, you begin to believe it possible. The situation with Mount St. Helens was that there was some build-up of gases underneath a dome, which the terrorists used 4 cruise missiles to plunge into (the same spot of weakness) one after another, with delayed detonations. After the fourth one, it hit the explosive gases and prompted the eruption.

      --
      I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
  84. Re:What I learned May 18th. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since moderators are retarded. May 18th, 1980 Mt. St. Helens erupted inconvienencing Seattle with a light dusting of fine ash.

  85. Re:I suggest by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't Allah be a better candidate to whale on the US?

    --
    Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
  86. Re:VolcanoCam is slashdotted -We HOPE by potus98 · · Score: 1

    Let's just hope the VolcanoCam has been /.ed. Else... :-(

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  87. Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam by Dugsmyname · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A friend sent me this link to the Mount St. Helens Volcano Cam, updated every 5 minutes from the Johnston Ridge Observatory.

  88. Sorry, try again, thanks for playing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that the volcano god demands a hot young virgin female. Slashdot is full of ugly virgin male nerds.

    If you're in Washington, and Scuzzlebutt doesn't save you, you can always duck, and cover.

  89. When the only tool you have is a hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything looks like a nail?

  90. Locusts? That was back in May. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Troll
    Brood 'X' hit in May.

    Billions of black, shrimp-size bugs with transparent wings and beady red eyes are beginning to carpet trees, buildings, poles, and just about anything else vertical in a wide region of the U.S. The invasion zone stretches from the eastern seaboard west through Indiana and south to Tennessee.


    They don't report these sorts of things loudly. Even the National Geographic website didn't post any images. --And images of amazing turns of nature is one of the things they do best. Gee. Go figure.


    -FL

  91. Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the citizens around mt. St. Helens should get those leftover navy ELFs, they saved Pierce Brosnan when Dantes Peak erupted :).

  92. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by tntguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last year or the year before when they had the (false) lahar warning for Rainier, a friend of mine -- a 911 dispatcher -- was on a date when he got the emergency page. This woman, quite the clingy "me-first" type, got uppity with him for looking at his pager. He told her he had to go, there was an emergency. She didn't believe him. He stood up in the middle of the restaraunt and said, loudly, "Mt. Fucking-Rainier is erupting...call a cab.". That was their first (and last) date. :-)

    As an aside, anyone remember Jim Foreman (news reporter) doing a live broadcast from Harborview doing his normal melodramatic report that "dozens of casualties are being flown in now...we'll be here to report on it"? Good times.

  93. Not terrorism: Liberals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Only George W Bush has a plan to save America from Volcanoe-sponsored terrorism! If his opponent is elected, America will be in danger of destruction from weak-on-lava liberal policies and the usual liberal flip-floppy-stance on ash.


    Save America from Volcanoe's, Vote Bush 2004!

  94. Times like this by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    that it would be nice if it were in washington dc rather than washington.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Times like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have now been flagged as a terrorist. The black vans are on the way to pick you up. We will now spend a few years searching for WMDs in your home.

    2. Re:Times like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats Ok. I will probably be accused of Anthrax or perhaps spreading Killer Cold Virus or moving Tuloremia to Humans or.....

      BTW, where are the black helicopters?

    3. Re:Times like this by valkraider · · Score: 1

      BTW, where are the black helicopters?

      They have been discontinued due to lack of funds and/or lack of pilots.

  95. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2

    I recall a couple of photos (in Nat'l Geographic?) from some folks who were on Rainier when St. Helens blew. The 1st photo showed a person in the foreground, with the initial burst out of St. Helens in the background. The 2nd photo showed the foreground person being knocked on her ass, while the background showed St. Helen's burst pluming upward rapidly.

    Like any earthquake in the area, St. Helens can affect Rainier. The question is: Is Rainier stable enough to shrug these off? In 1980, the answer to that question was YES. It seems likely that if St. Helens' next eruption is as moderate as is being predicted, combined with Rainier's continued quiescence, then the answer will still be YES.

    --
    [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  96. Re:Exciting! by oldwarrior · · Score: 1, Funny

    I love gamma radiation, but I live in an abandoned lead mine...

    --
    If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
  97. The alert status changed yesterday by ColoradoSkier · · Score: 1

    There haven't been any updates so far this morning. The alert status went to level 2 yesterday at 10:40am PDT...

  98. Crap is the at scientific term? by toolshed7 · · Score: 0

    Crap: lots of shit flying everywhere. Crapper:Someone who throws shit. The crapper of a volcano exploded.

    --


    Deserving got nothing to do with it.....shuffle
  99. Webcam greyed out by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    If you go to the webcam at the visitor's center right now (7:40 am pst), you'll see nothing but a grey screen. It's the early morning fog. If it were ash, you would get a "page not found...", something /. readers see more often than not anyway.

  100. Yes by Webmoth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being I live in SW Washington, probably 20 miles from MSH, I can attest that at 6:30am there was a pretty heavy cloud cover that made things mighty dark.

    If the picture is gray, that means it's foggy.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  101. I'm probably being severly ignorant... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    I thought CO2 emissions were something we had too much of. Is this like cholesterol, where there is a "good" CO2 and a "bad" CO2?

    I'll shut up now and yield the floor to the "experts"

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:I'm probably being severly ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what certain enviro-facists say. The truth is that Krakatoa eruption in 1883 (which was admittedly a very very big one) put more CO2 in the atmosphere than all the cars in all the world ever have.

      Cutting down trees is much worse for the environment than putting CO2 in the air.

    2. Re:I'm probably being severly ignorant... by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those damn hippies at the Pentagon... be like Bush, cover your ears and pretend there's nothing to this global warming thing.

  102. this is interesting by vegasbright · · Score: 0

    Considering that the USGS is sheepish about warnings, this is not to be taken lightly. Keep in mind that there were erutions after the "big one" in 1986. Helens is a very restless beast, and from 80 to 86 there were eruptions that built up the dome that is present there now. Lets just say that I wouldn't be buying property near spirit lake anytime soon. More worrysome is the damage another eruption could do to the fragile ecosystem surrounding the stratovolcano.

    --

    Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
    1. Re:this is interesting by valkraider · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be buying property near Spirit Lake because it is on a National Volcanic Monument, within a National Forest.

    2. Re:this is interesting by vegasbright · · Score: 0

      Well Duh. Are you one to also start a petition to have Harry Turtledove novels reclassified as teaching revisionist history?

      --

      Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
  103. Cam. by juuri · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the cam isn't in a very good location. I've been watching it on my desk at work for days and more often than not, your view is covered by clouds.

    When it does clear up (15% of the time) you do have an awesome view of the peak, surrounding clouds and clear blue skies.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:Cam. by valkraider · · Score: 1

      How is the cam not in a good location? The entire mountain is enveloped in the clouds. Perhaps if we moved the volcano to the sunny southwest for our viewing pleasure....

      I prefer to go up there myself, rather than watch webcams.

  104. Oblig Simpsons Quote by fizban · · Score: 3, Funny

    "At least we'll die doing what we love...inhaling molten rock"
    -Homer

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  105. USGS Pictures, before & after by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    See the following link to see various pictures of Mt. St. Helens, before and after the May 18, 1980 eruption.

    http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volcanoes/MSH/Images/may 18_images.html (Courtesy of USGS)

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  106. SEP Seismograph? by smyle · · Score: 1

    This seems like a strange way to keep others from messing with your seismograph. Why not just lock it up?

    --

    Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  107. What? No mods/replies?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't have to #$%&@# impress you!"
    --Stewie

  108. Just curious... by Claw919 · · Score: 1

    Just finished reading more Israel/Palestine stuff, and I have to ask: Theoretically, if someone launched a few mortars at the volcano cap... would that be enough to make it erupt?

    1. Re:Just curious... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Probably not, unless it was about to go anyway, in which case you couldn't be sure it was the mortar that did it.

      A mortar is a mere pinprick compared to the forces withing an active volcano.

  109. It's now moved up to yellow alert by xmuskrat · · Score: 2

    It's now YELLOW/ELEVATED: SIGNIFICANT RISK OF BAD THINGS HAPPENING I hope it doesn't go up to RED/SEVERE: LOTS OF BUBBLY HOT STUFF ON THE GROUND

    --
    activestudios web design
  110. Isn't this a dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article just before this one already talked about this release of a slow-moving mass of lava being released on the west coast.

    No, wait.. the other one was about a slow-moving mass of JAVA. Sorry, my bad.

  111. St. Helen's Cam -- Watch it blow by flogger · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can watch the CAM here. There is a nice view of the volcano.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:St. Helen's Cam -- Watch it blow by hopemafia · · Score: 1

      "There is a nice view of the volcano."

      Or at least there would be if it wasn't cloudy...and if the CAM wasn't slashdotted 90% of the time....

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  112. Re:I suggest by vegasbright · · Score: 0

    Nah, he's tired from his "holy" campaign against Israel. IMHO, god has no place doing anything, no matter what you call him.

    --

    Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
  113. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by redbaron7 · · Score: 1

    Some of the earthquakes are approaching magnitude 3, so it is very likely that the Rainier seismometers are picking up activity from Mt St Helens.

    A seismometer can pick up small local earthquake, or a large distant earthquake. Although they'll have different frequency signatures, it is virtually impossible to get a good location for it unless you have multiple records from different places. I would wait until the CVO has produced some locations before drawing any conclusions.

    At the moment, the frequency of earthquakes means the CVO staff are having to manually locate the earthquakes. (probably interference between each earthquake signal)

    Richard
  114. last time was 630k years ago.... by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    Yup, it has been erupting every ~600k years for a while now, but the last one was ~630k years ago.

    The one that exploded roughly 1.8million years ago exploded with a force somewhere between 2,500 and 8,000 times the magnitude of the last Mount St. Helens explosion, creating a crater 60km wide. It laid down ash 3m deep 1600km away.

    So we're due for another explosion Real Soon Now. Fortunately for us (Well, you folks in the US, anyway), Real Soon Now in this context probably means sometime in the next few thousand years...

  115. Good explaination why the VolcanoCam is blank... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    No, it's not the alien conspiracy doing it...

    This is from the Mount St. Helens VolcanoCam site, in the archive area.

    Mount St. Helens is located in the Pacific Northwest where is has either just stopped raining, is currently raining, or is getting ready to rain. The camera site is at an elevation of approximately 4,500 feet. It is located approximately 5 miles north-northwest from the volcano, and looks across the North Fork Toutle River Valley. This is an area which receives more than 100 inches of rain a year. Most likely, you are looking at rain, clouds, fog, and/or a combination of the three.

    There is nothing wrong with the VolcanoCam or the image.

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  116. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by redbaron7 · · Score: 1

    Just because you can see one volcano from another, does not mean they are connected in a meaningful way within the top 10-20 miles of the lithosphere (crust).

    Yes, if you have a lava dome close to collapse (eg. Mt St Helens in early May 1980), then a reasonable size earthquake could be the trigger to cause that collapse. And that earthquake could be local, from another volcano, or even another fault (no, Parkfield has nothing to do with the current activity in WA): but the collapse was going to happen anyway, whether it is at that moment or in a couple of days time.

    Richard

  117. SEP seismograph? by Watcher · · Score: 2, Funny

    The most recent readings at the SEP seismograph stationed on the lava dome itself are totally saturated.
    Somebody Else's Problem seismograph? What does it do, make the volcano disappear if it becomes too inconvenient?

  118. Anyone taking bets? by beef3k · · Score: 1

    So, are any of the online bookies taking bets on whether it'll erupt or not?

  119. Is it just me... by vegasbright · · Score: 0

    ...or can anyone else not help themselves from mentioning things like "blow its wad, shoot its load, and other sexual phrases in referencing this?

    --

    Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
  120. Defrag? by tag · · Score: 2, Funny
    The most recent readings at the SEP seismograph stationed on the lava dome itself are totally saturated.

    Looks like Mount St. Helens is about to defrag.

  121. South Park by vegasbright · · Score: 0

    Everything'l be safe. I learned on South Park that all you need to do is "Duck and cover".

    --

    Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
  122. Long Period Events ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't they now roughly predict eruptions using long period events ?

  123. Unless you're a horse by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Or unless you're a horse. Our 4-legged friend can readily indicate that it's not feeling well to its handlers, unless of course its handlers are worth their salt and then will of course know the horse feels ill before it does.

  124. An open question to international /. readers by gphinch · · Score: 1

    So in America we can kind of divide the country into areas based upon what natural disasters are frequent. In California, we get earthquakes, Florida and the east coast/south get hurricanes, the middle of the country gets tornados, and apparently the northwest gets volcanos. My question is, are Europe, South America, Canada, and other parts of the world divided like this as well? Being American, no one really teaches anything about the outside world except that we make it a better place.

    --
    in bed.
    1. Re:An open question to international /. readers by dgagley · · Score: 1

      Actually we in Seattle also get earthquakes but most are deep so you cant feel them. I'm not too worried about St. Helens its Mt. Rainer that I am waiting for. It is past its normal cycle of eruptions so its due.

      --
      I can't use my sig - my computer can't read my handwriting.
    2. Re:An open question to international /. readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I went to visit people in Wales, I was warned about a storm dropping 30cm of sheep everywhere... I mean really - what kind of boots do you wear for that kind of weather? What about umbrellas?

    3. Re:An open question to international /. readers by Anthony · · Score: 1

      We in Australia have no active plate margins so we are sitting in the middle as our plate "rushes" ever-northward. This means we have no extant vulcanism (recent hot spot activity ceased a few thousand years ago) and no major earthquake zones on the continent. We do have some earthquakes with Newcastle being our biggest disaster - Richter 5.4?. Building codes have been tightened since then. Weatherwise, we are a tad dry(driest continent next to Antarctica). We have drought and bushfires. Bushfires would be our most common natural disaster with the recent bushfires in 2003 notably burning over 500 houses in my city, Canberra. Drought is a little harder to quantify as it can be argued to be often an economic, not a natural disaster. The counter to that is of couse episodic floods. Bot then again, flood zones are well known. Cyclones [Hurricanes] ravage our northern coast, but we have low populations. The destruction of Darwin in 1974 being the major disaster there. With the low rainfall and low relief, landlides are relatively rare, with a recent landslide in Thredbo being the exception. This was found to be caused by a broken water pipe, poor road construction, and uder-managed groundwater above the village.

      I learnt all this and more at http://ems.anu.edu.au/student/ug/index.php?unit=ge ol1002

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  125. Re:Before anyone posts the lame Florida hurricane by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    LOL. Too bad it weren't true and just the opposite.

  126. Re:Exciting! by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

    I love Continental Drift, but then I have a lot of time on my hands.

  127. Stevenson Live Motion Web Cam by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There is a live motion web cam in nearby Stevenson, WA -- which was covered in a fairly thick layer of ash during the last eruption. It's low framerate but at least you can see updates at most every few seconds during bad periods. (Not including if it gets /.'ed of course.)

    PS: We installed a Qorvus Meshcam(tm) on the top of the Skamania County Government building as part of the Stevenson Wifi Project, which was the first municiple public access mesh network to go live in the US.

  128. Re:Locusts? That was back in May. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bugs belong to the largest group, or brood, of periodical cicadas--insects that spend most of their lives as nymphs, burrowed underground and sucking sap from tree roots. They emerge once every 17 years, transform into adults, do the business of reproduction, and then die.

    It's not that bad. It happens all the time. If someone spouted off an end-of-world claim every time there was a plauge of bugs...well... we'd still have as many end-of-world claims. 17 years isn't that long, and most people would remember last time the cicadas came. Hell, I do, and I'm only 21. They probably thought it wasn't newsworthy, because it happens all the time. No tinfoil brigade needs to be sent out for this one. You can thank me later when we all find out (via a Fox TV special, I'm sure) that the X Prize was faked.

  129. Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Informative

    It occurs to me now that the city of Portland Oregon (metro population 1.1 million) was menaced by the last big eruption of Mt. St. Helen's in May 1980.
    In that event, the entire north side of the mountain blew up in a explosion with force equal to many hydrogen bombs. Luckly the area devastated was wilderness forest. Only about 15 people lived in the several hundred square miles primarily affected.
    However on the west side of the mountain, there was a nuclear power plant on the Columbia river about 50 miles (80 km) away. If the volcano had blown out through the west side of the mountain instead of the north side, there was the serious possiblility that the shock wave would have ruptured the reactor coolant tanks and damaged the control and safety systems. In a worst case, this could have led to the release of radioactive material into the last 50 miles of the Columbia river. The river would have been closed for shipping. Which means that the port of Portland would have been closed, stopping shipment of massive amounts of grain to Asia from the Pacific Northwest. It would have also caused the extinction of the fisheries, such as salmon and steelhead trout in the Columbia.
    Incredibly, during this entire pre-eruption period, the operaters of the Trojan Nuclear Power Plant did not shut down the facility or take any precautions against earthquake damage. The plant is closed now after it was revealed that it lies directly over an earthquake fault, but the spent fuel rods are still stored there because there isn't any other place to put them.
    At the time of the eruption, no one seemed to be aware of this possibility. Or, more likely, everyone just decided to keep really quiet.
    The eruption was too bad because Mt. St. Helens was a perfect cone before the eruption. It looked like Mt. Fuji in Japan. Now it looks like a million-seat football stadium: a big hole with a circular ridge around half of it.

    1. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by mranchovy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now it looks like a million-seat football stadium

      ...with a cool halftime show.

      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
    2. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by payslee · · Score: 4, Informative
      The river was closed for shipping the last time around. They had to dredge many billions of tons of ash and debris from the explosion and mud flows before the river was navigable again. No rioting or starvation last time, and presumably none the next time. I'll grant that it wasn't radioactive mud, but the fish still left in this watershed are tough SOBs after what they've been through for the last 150 years.


      I actually rather like the new and improved version of St. Helens. Perfect geometry is boring. I highly recommend, once the mountain settles down, the long hike up to the rim of the crater. You come to it with a suddeness I can't describe, after hours of trudging through snow fields. All of a sudden you see the terrible beauty that destruction can bring, with, on a clear day, Mount Rainier and Mount Adams looking impossibly close by.


      Even if there are no volcanoes in your backyard, mountains are great, symmetrical or smashed. Go visit some.

      --
      Doing my part to piss off the religious right.
    3. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by mikerich · · Score: 5, Interesting
      However on the west side of the mountain, there was a nuclear power plant on the Columbia river about 50 miles (80 km) away. If the volcano had blown out through the west side of the mountain instead of the north side, there was the serious possiblility that the shock wave would have ruptured the reactor coolant tanks and damaged the control and safety systems. In a worst case, this could have led to the release of radioactive material into the last 50 miles of the Columbia river. The river would have been closed for shipping. Which means that the port of Portland would have been closed, stopping shipment of massive amounts of grain to Asia from the Pacific Northwest. It would have also caused the extinction of the fisheries, such as salmon and steelhead trout in the Columbia.

      It's unlikely that even the most massive eruption from Mt. St. Helens could have threatened the plant. The incredible first lateral blast only travelled 25km and IIRC the pyroclastic flows only extended about 20km. Ashfall would not have been a problem for the plant, and the quakes associated with vulcanism are (Hollywood aside) fairly small.

      In the event, they had a pretty good idea that Mount St. Helens was going to erupt through its side. The area that bulged was called Goat's Roack and was actually the result of an earlier eruption through the side of the cone.

      What no one had predicted was that the whole side of the mountain would slide off. Instantly a huge section of the magma below the mountain depressurised - like a champagne cork blowing off. And that did the damage.

      What we have now is young magma pushing up under the mountain. We'll probably see a series of small eruptions as the dome is built, extended and then blown apart. We could have centuries of this sort of activity ahead of us.

      The eruption was too bad because Mt. St. Helens was a perfect cone before the eruption. It looked like Mt. Fuji in Japan. Now it looks like a million-seat football stadium: a big hole with a circular ridge around half of it.

      You're not thinking long-term - the cone of Mt. St. Helens was only a few tens of thousands of years old, it will rebuild itself in the next few millennia. In the meantime, sit back and watch the mountain heal itself.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    4. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      The plant is closed now after it was revealed that it lies directly over an earthquake fault, but the spent fuel rods are still stored there because there isn't any other place to put them.

      Cowards. The plant at Diablo Canyon sits near to a few fault lines (about two miles away for the closest) and it still runs, even after recent quakes in the area including the San Simeon 6.5 quake last year.

      Bring it back online! Face the risk like true intrepid explorers! The next generation of mutants may save your life!

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by gid-goo · · Score: 1

      Its pretty incredible. Looking over the cornice in to the crater, the constant sound of rock fall down the sides, the massive dome at the bottom of the crater. A hike definitely well worth it. And in late spring/early summer you can glissade back down!

    6. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Trojan nuclear plant was closed because the heat exchanger failed, not because it was built on a fault.

    7. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by iamlucky13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First of all...the Trojan nuclear reactor was not built on a volcano, it was built near one. In fact, it's about 75 miles away (an estimate, I don't have a map in front of me). As someone else noted, the shockwave was only significant for a radius of about 25 km. The pyroclastic flow went north (the wrong way) for about 20 km, following the low ground. Trojan is on the other side of the Columbia River in the middle of a big plain. Debris from the eruption is simply not a threat. Additionally, the containment building is designed to take a direct hit from a commercial airliner without threatening the integrity of the core or the heat exchanger. That probably really means something like a 1% chance of breach, but it still shows you that it's well built.

      Additionally, the Trojan reactor was not shut down due to the proximity of a fault and fear of earthquake damage, but due to an aging coolant system that would have cost $billions to rebuild. Admittedly it is an older design and there are safer options now, but my point is Mt. St. Helens does not threaten us with a nuclear disaster.

      The spent fuel rods are still there because some crazy people are convinced that they are safer sitting in a pool a couple hundred yards from the Columbia River than converted into a ceramic, encased in steel and concrete, and buried under Yucca mountain.

      I wish I could go hike up there, but other people tell me that would be stupid and now illegal, so I guess I'll have to settle for looking out the window.

    8. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by John+Newman · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up if I could. Why is that irrational scaremongering gets +5 insightful while the rational reply gets nadda?

    9. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eruptions are inevitable on live volcanoes, it's just a matter of time.

      indeed, that is thy they are considered "live" volcanoes.

    10. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, i never asked for you to come here and spout off the rational truth.

    11. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      Additionally, the containment building is designed to take a direct hit from a commercial airliner without threatening the integrity of the core or the heat exchanger.

      The World Trade Center was designed to take a direct hit from a commercial airliner too. So much for that idea. It all depends on the size of the commercial airliner in question.

    12. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it did. It was the fire that cause the ultimate collapse.

    13. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed it did. It even stayed standing for long enough for most of the people inside to evacuate.

    14. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have mod points, but I thought I would reply to your post instead. If you would feel safer with the stuff buried under Yucca Mountain then you:

      a) do not live anywhere near Nevada. Ever stop to think Nevadans don't want that shit buried in their state either?

      b) have not read any of the scientific studies that show seismic activity and water table activity near the proposed Yucca Mountain facility. Waste buried there will not be any safer than where it is now, except you personally won't be living as close to it.

      c) you ignore all risk associated with the transportation of the nuclear waste materials to a different site. What about the terrorists who are hiding behind every Bush? It makes an attractive target for them don;t you think?

      d) you ignore the fact that we have more waste than we can store in Yucca Mountain. What do we do with the rest of the current waste and future waste that will pile up?

      The real question we should be asking is why do we create waste that takes sometimes millions of years before it will be safe? Yes there *are* lots of crazy people out there. Perhaps if you had a better argument then simply calling them "crazy" you would be able to convince them.

    15. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...lets encase them in ceramic, steel and concrete and burry them in a mountain near your house. Try living in Las Vegas or the areas surounding Yucca Mountain. It's a little unsettleing to be so close to the old nuke testing range let alone having fresh nuke material shipped into my backyard. Of which so far the little bit they have shipped into Yucca has on quite a few occasions traveled thru Las Vegas which is NEVER supposed to happen yet they managed to "lose track" of a few trucks that did go thru Vegas (bet that'd make ya feel all warm knowing the government can't even keep track of a shipent of radioactive material that will probably go down your street). Not to mention the stress on our roads from the exceptionaly heavy trucks. I say let each state decide where they wanna put thier spent nuke materials in thier state instead of dumping it in Nevada which unless I'm mistaken doesn't have ONE nuke plant in it. Nevada never agreed to allow the Yucca Mountain project it's just the rest of the states ganged up on the state to get the ball rolling. Even the supreeme court is siding with Nevada on that.

    16. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by astar · · Score: 1
      I think you are blowing smoke on the nuclear power plant being potentially affected. As you say, there were a few hundred square miles affected. Take the square root of that and compare to your 50 miles away. And you are worrying about "shock", whatever that is. I guess you mean earthquakes, but these are even at the eruption mainly a local affair. You also compared it to many hydrogen bombs. My memory of press stories was it was compared to an atomic bomb, not many fusion bombs. The comparision needs to be considered also on total energy released vs length of time released.

      So I conjecture you are a anti-nuclear alarmist.

      I live in Seattle and could see the eruption. I have a small IT story from this occasion. I saw the plume and immeadiately left my new wife and kid over their protests and drove to the shop and shut down the computers, particular the disk drives. These were the old winchester models. I was the EDP supervisor. The issue was if the plume blew north, the the grit would get in the disk drives and wreck them.

      When next at work, the boss wanted to chew me out for not properly taking care of assets that were signed out to me as supervisor. I was pleased to cut him short.

    17. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Inebrius · · Score: 1

      Both towers of the WTC did take direct hits from airplanes and survived.

      It was the burning fuel that weakened the columns or if you believe the conspiracy theorists, the government blowing up the towers that caused them to collapse.

      The WTC and containment domes are hardly the same thing. Additionally, testing has been done both simulated and real with containment domes.

    18. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Inebrius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Cowards. The plant at Diablo Canyon sits near to a few fault lines (about two miles away for the closest) and it still runs, even after recent quakes in the area including the San Simeon 6.5 quake last year."

      The San Simeon quake was much closer to Paso Robles - which is about 50 miles away. While it shook things, it never posed any real challenge to safety systems. In fact, the forces measured at the plant were low enough that the plant did not even experience an automatic reactor trip.

      Diablo Canyon was designed to safely handle a much higher magnitude quake from a much closer fault line (~7 mi away, Hosgri fault).

      There are fault lines all over the country. Parts of the US get tornadoes. Some parts are more susceptable to hurricanes.

      The recent earthquakes are certainly not a reason to shut down Diablo Canyon. Why do you think so? Or are you just using your fears or those of others to dictate a position that is wholly unsupported by any scientific or engineering information.

      Diablo Canyon produces over 2200 MW continuously 24-7, most of the time when not refueling. And the power is relatively cheap to produce. What would you propose as an alternative? More natural gas plants? More coal? Wind turbines? They aren't exactly environmentally friendly, if you are a bird. Solar? Neither wind nor solar are cheap nor reliable enough for baseload.

      Aside for there being no rational reason to shut down Diablo Canyon, the economics of replacement power do not make any sense.

    19. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by ipfwadm · · Score: 1, Informative
      Both towers of the WTC did take direct hits from airplanes and survived. It was the burning fuel that weakened the columns ... that caused them to collapse.

      You're playing games and you know it. They survived for what, an hour?

      Had the planes not hit the towers, would they be standing today? Presumably. Can we therefore say that they collapsed as a result of getting hit by those planes? Yes we can. Besides, no one said that any potential problems with the power plant had to be a direct result of a collision; it could be an indirect result just like it was with the WTC.

      The WTC and containment domes are hardly the same thing.

      Never said they were. I was merely pointing out the fact that not all commercial airliners are equal. The WTC was designed to withstand the impact of a commercial airliner, but it was contemporary commercial airliners that were designed for, not the ones that would be in the sky 20 or 30 years later. The same is certainly possible with the nuclear reactor in question.

    20. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful


      You're not thinking long-term - the cone of Mt. St. Helens was only a few tens of thousands of years old, it will rebuild itself in the next few millennia. In the meantime, sit back and watch the mountain heal itself.

      That's small consolation to someone who won't be alive 10,000 years from now, and is mourning the loss of some pretty scenery.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    21. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Sure, mountains are pretty, but they're nothing compared to the sight of a spectacular fireworks show!

      Mount St. Helens, light'er up!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    22. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Alsee · · Score: 1

      it's about 75 miles away... shockwave was only significant for a radius of about 25 km.

      Congratulations on confusing both the Americans and Europeans.

      P.S.
      Were you on the Mars Climate Orbiter team?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    23. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      It did take a direct hit and survive. What it wasn't designed for was the heat of the fire (when steel is cold it is rigid, but when steel gets hot it gets soft). If it was possible to form a fire by someone smuggling a compareable number of barrels of airplane fuel into one of the floors of the building, and setting it on fire, that would have had the same effect even without the airplanes' impacts.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    24. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, getting more and more redundant...

    25. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by avgjoe62 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The WTC was designed to withstand the impact of a commercial airliner, but it was contemporary commercial airliners that were designed for, not the ones that would be in the sky 20 or 30 years later.

      Just to be a pedantic idiot, I have to point out that 747s first flew commercially in 1969. The towers were finished in 1972 for Tower One and 1973 for Tower Two.

      The planes that hit were smaller than 747s. The collapse was not caused by the impact of the airliners. The towers collapsed becuase the secondary fires from the collision buckled the steel because the insullation was ripped off in the initial collisions. It was the secondary effects of the collisions that caused the collapse.

      The above is of course splitting hairs, but let's give the architects/engineers some slack. After all, I'm sure that they never designed the towers to survive an intentional collision with an airliner.

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    26. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by mikerich · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That's small consolation to someone who won't be alive 10,000 years from now, and is mourning the loss of some pretty scenery.

      Well speaking as a geologist I always find that when you think in terms of geological time so many other problems - the bank, work, Dubya - all fall into perspective. That scenery has been changed time and time again. It's inevitable that this will go on.

      The people of Washington are getting a chance to see how their planet formed. In a couple of decades whole new forests will be established, there will be new mountain meadows and all the time a new mountain will be growing. Fantastic!

      Take the kids and go look in awe at Mount St. Helens, show them that Nature isn't just wallpaper, its always changing.

      And as a Brit - I'm thoroughly jealous that the US has volcanoes and we don't...

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    27. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by ipfwadm · · Score: 1
      For what it's worth, as I recall from post-9/11 readings, the towers were designed for the impact of a 707, which was the largest airliner in flight at the time the WTC was designed.

      Hmmm... As I look around for some links to back this up, I find some interesting things (even after ignoring the conspiracy theorist websites). The 707 was indeed the largest airliner in flight when the towers were designed. However, the 767 is VERY similar to the 707 in fuel capacity, weight, wingspan, and top speed. Specifically, the 767's fuel capacity is only 4% more than that of the 707. So, either the designers were lying when they said it was designed for a 707 impact, or ...?

      Further, as you alluded to, although the 747 was not in flight when construction of the WTC began, it was in final design phase during the design of the WTC, and therefore the designers could (should?) have considered it, since its specifications were known at the time.

      Data from here.

    28. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by furchin · · Score: 1

      ...too bad it's not going to air on CBS.

    29. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Yes it's redundant, which is why the original poster should have known better and needed to be corrected.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    30. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on confusing both the Americans and Europeans.

      P.S.
      Were you on the Mars Climate Orbiter team?


      Touche! Sorry, I took the 25 km figure from another post, which gave it in km...15 miles if it bothers you. Also, although I didn't take it from a published source, it fits with what I've seen while camping and hiking near the volcano.

    31. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      becasue its better to create a small amount of waste that can be handled with ease, better then burning coal and oil creating many diffrent wastes and gasses that are harmfull to humans, animal life, plant life and the atmosphear.

      frankly i don't get why so many people get up in arms over fission and many totaly false statistics and facts about it and totaly overlook the very true facts about coal and oil. more people will die from coal pollution this year then nukes ever have killed.

      So all in all its better then anything else we got (and no, wind solar and hydro and no where near enough) and for now its what we should be useing untill clean power is more easeily availble

    32. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      well i'll put forth they probally accounted for the inpact only.

      but how well could they or anyone have know what would really happen if a 707, 767 or other aircraft of that sized did hit a skyscraper? computer modles can onlt go so far

      now they do and i'm sure now if they built anything it would truely beable to hold up after the hit.

    33. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      You may want to check the version on your Humor Detector. The battery may be dead, or you may not have gotten the upgrade to firmware version v7.38, which fixes occasional lapses in detection.

      I'm all for nuclear power. I think we should scrap most of our existing power plants and go all-nuclear, with breeder reactors to minimize the need to mining new ore and to minimize the storage needs of fuel waste (which would, for the uninitiated, be turned back into useful fuel through the breeder process). I figure with a couple hundred billion dollars, some standardized designs, and a bit of regulatory magic, it could be done in 20 years or so.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    34. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by japhmi · · Score: 1

      After all, I'm sure that they never designed the towers to survive an intentional collision with an airliner.

      Actually, they admitted that they designed it for a plane on low speeds, searching the fog for JFK. They never expected one to slam full-throttle into them.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    35. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I gently point out that government safety controls are a mockery, when they build nuclear power plants on live volcanoes, and that's "Flamebait"? The irony is that these dangerous nuke plants are literally flamebait.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    36. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by True+Grit · · Score: 1
      And as a Brit - I'm thoroughly jealous that the US has volcanoes and we don't...

      We'll trade ya Helens for Big Ben, whaddya' say?

      :)

    37. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by True+Grit · · Score: 1
      So, either the designers were lying when they said it was designed for a 707 impact, or ...?

      As the post above you explained, the engineers weren't lying, they (along with everyone else at the time) didn't forsee the secondary effects of an impact. The impact of the planes did not cause the collapses, but they did strip away insulation from the steel frame, and it was the resulting aviation fuel fire which got so hot it started to partially melt the steel and that resulted in the steel frame buckling. I know conspiricy theories are everyone's favorite, and we all look for evil intent first, but I think simple oversight/stupidity explains this tragedy best.

      A nuclear containment building is nothing like a scyscraper anyway. First they aren't near as tall, thus their "frame" doesn't carry as much weight, all their weight is on the "outside" anyway, there is no internal structure beyond just supports, and what the building is protecting. Second, the Towers were made of iron, concrete, and glass, whereas these containment buildings are made of 3 to 4 contiguous feet of reinforced concrete. Most importantly, these buildings are designed specifically to prevent penetration (from within or without). The Towers, of course, couldn't be designed that way given their height and the need for visibility (ever seen glass windows in a nuclear containment building? Didn't think so.), scyscrapers are just designed to "survive" a penetrating impact, where the impact does massive damage but the frame survives to keep the building from collapsing. Clearly this didn't happen with the Towers because someone forgot to factor in the extreme temperatures of an aviation fuel fire.

      A containment building however is designed to withstand the impact without allowing any penetration at all. One test I heard of was when they rammed a fighter jet at full speed into a building built like a containment vessel. The jet disappeared, but it took only ~2 inches of the outside concrete with it. The rest of the building was unharmed.
    38. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by True+Grit · · Score: 1
      P.S. Were you on the Mars Climate Orbiter team?


      Doh!

      That was mean.

      :)
    39. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by mikerich · · Score: 1
      We'll trade ya Helens for Big Ben, whaddya' say?

      Done - just so long as I can put the volcano right next to Parliament.

      'News just breaking: the country celebrates as 600 odd - very odd - parliamentarians are buried under tens of feet of white-hot ash....'

      C'mon - a guy's gotta dream!

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    40. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by troutfisher · · Score: 0

      I thought the Trojan Nuclear Power plant was deactivated. I remember a while ago about them transporting the rods out of the plant. Anyonelse have the inside scoop. Please tell me because I only live about 10 miles from this power plant.

    41. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The towers were designed to withstand a hit from a 707, which is actually heavier than the 757 which hit one of the towers, and also is heavier in some configurations than the 767 which hit the other. The 767 and 757 are faster, but were not exceeding the speed of a 707 on impact. A 707 actually has a larger fuel payload possibility than a 767 due to having less efficient engines. I can only guess that the calculations did not take into consideration the amount of fuel that a fully loaded 707 would have carried.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    42. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You should slap him in the face repeatedly with an OSHA handbook. I don't care if your company owns Deep Blue, it's not worth risking a human life to go shut it down.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    43. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by astar · · Score: 1

      Oh, that is too hard on the boss. My risk to life was just the ordinary freeway risk. Please remember that the volcano is probably like a 100 miles away. We sometime have clear skys out here so you could see it from a distance. And I think his rant was going to the idea that I should have called the vice president who lives near the office and have him take care of it.

      We called him "old alligator shoes". I sort of liked him. He was pure in his excessiveness.

    44. Re:Portland Oregon threatened in last eruption by http · · Score: 1

      Why are you ignoring the `conspiracy` sites? It doesn't take rocket science to figure out that they are on to something.
      However, some rocket scientists have researched the situation, and clearly show that the `official` story is woefully flimsy. At which point, it would be wise to remember that you are likely being deliberately misinformed.

      --
      If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
      3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
  130. I was there... by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was going to college in Moscow, Idaho when it blew, and believe me, it was impressive, even that far away from the eruption.

    Throughout the day a tolkeinesque black cloud grew larger and larger on the western horizon, until it streched all of the way north to south. As it came over it became darker than night, the sky was just black. Then is started to "snow" volcanic ash. Instead of coming down in flakes, it came down as a fine powder, but looking out the window, it looked like snow against the street lights. This was about 3:00 in the afternoon.

    It didn't get light again before nightfall. The next morning, it was as if it had snowed, except it was very finely powdered ash, and it didn't go away like snow, it just compacted and then blew around as dust when the wind blew.

    It was a very memorable experience, more impressive even than a total solar eclipse (but that's another story)...

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:I was there... by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      The ash cloud shut down the mall I was working in in Billings, Montana at 2 in the afternoon.

      The manager of the store tried to file an insurance claim for loss of business and the insurance company wouldn't accept it. :)

      We didn't get it nearly as bad as, say, Spokane, but it was pretty gray for a day or so.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
  131. If it walks like a duck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    showing a link between a large earthquack in Alaska and increased geyser eruptions

    I don't think this means what you think it means...

  132. My 1980 eruption anecdote by grgyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was ten years old living down in Vancouver, WA back in 1980. We had a pristine view of the mountain from our back yard and would constantly have "eruption barbeques" at the house.

    During one of the many ash-falls that used to regularly dust us, my brother and I ran out one morning to play in the new ash before our parents woke up. There was about 1-2 inches coating everything, like new snow, and it had just rained making all of the ash into an interesting clay-like consistency.

    Kids being kids, my little brother and I ran out to the driveway and started writing our names with our fingers into the ash covering my dad's brand new 1 day old VW Scirroco in the driveway. It started out with "Hi" and "Cool" and progressed to "Van Halen kicks ass" and "KISS rules" and liberal scrawlings of "dork", "shit", "Tony sucks dick", drawings of boobies and penises, you get the idea.

    Well, we got into a hell of a lot of trouble when my dad saw the car when he had to wipe all of the ash off to drive to work. Our trouble later escalated when he discovered that, after going through a car wash to rinse off the rest, everything that we had written on his car was now premanently scratched into the paint and windows of his car, ash being a fine gritty silicate. Our dad's co-workers ribbed him endlessly about his "custom paint job" as it took him several weeks before he could get his car repainted and the windows replaced.

    All told, a few thousand dollar "oops" for us kids ;)

    --
    ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
  133. Right next door by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    The Cascades Volcano Observatory is right next door to where I work and I can see their front door from my window. If I see them running out and heading for their cars, I'm outa here.

  134. /ducks by minator · · Score: 1

    /ducks

    No really, there's a volcano about to blow up...

  135. but it's good for the grapes by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    The last time Mt St Helens erupted, it led to some really good wine the following years (due to the ash being added to the soil). So ... I'm looking forward to it.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  136. my recollection of that day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hiking up a peak in the Tatoosh range with my climbing class (S. of Mt Rainier) the morning St. Helens blew in 1980. We didn't hear any sound at all although people in Alaska reported hearing it. It was a clear sunny morning and the first thing we noticed was this weird cloud covering the whole sky, rolling toward Mt Rainier. When it covered the sun it got dark, like midnight. The ash started to fall, looked like a snowstorm but when it landed on your hand it wasn't cold & wet, it was dry and dusty. Then the snow we were on turned dark gray, and we left white footprints - looked like a photographic negative. We had to cover our faces with extra t-shirts, bandanas, etc (luckily we were prepared) in order not to breathe the ash in. At first we wanted to move faster toward the summit so we could see the eruption (St. Helens was behind the peak we were climbing) but as the ashfall increased we decided the heck with that, let's run back down to our cars! We went in a small cabin at the parking lot where we started than decided to try and drive out to the West. Some cars were stalled on the side of the road with their air filters clogged with ash but we made it out into the sunshine.

  137. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by sexylicious · · Score: 1

    Jim Forman cracked me up. I actually miss his stuff since moving to California.

    "There's a pile of shit at 4th and Pine!"
    "It's brown and about waist high!"
    "We'll keep you updated. This is Jim Forman, King 5 News. Back to you Jean."


    Ever notice how he always got stuck doing the crappiest stories? LOL.

  138. So... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    "Mount St. Helens Alert Status Increased"

    So are we at a Significant, High, or Severe risk of volcano attacks?

  139. You can't win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Live in the northwest: Volcanoes

    Live in the southwest: Earthquakes

    Live on the east coast: Hurricanes

    Live in the south/central part of the country: Tornadoes

    Live in the north: Blizzards

    Live in Indiana: You have to live in Indiana

    1. Re:You can't win by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      " Live in the northwest: Volcanoes
      Live in the southwest: Earthquakes
      Live on the east coast: Hurricanes
      Live in the south/central part of the country: Tornadoes
      Live in the north: Blizzards
      Live in Indiana: You have to live in Indiana"

      I *DO* live in Indiana.

      My advice: take your chances with the natural disasters.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    2. Re:You can't win by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um, the Northeast doesn't lose people at the rate of multiple dozens every winter to blizzards.

      I'll keep my snow and ice thank you.

      I imagine Arizone is pretty safe... just hot.

    3. Re:You can't win by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      " Yeah, um, the Northeast doesn't lose people at the rate of multiple dozens every winter to blizzards."

      People die all the time due to blizzards:
      people die shovelling, people die in car accidents due to the ice and snow, people die from freezing, etc.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  140. Yellowstone by lildogie · · Score: 1

    > If it were to erupt again --
    > fortunately it does so rarely, about once every 600k years

    IIRC, a lake in Yellowstone is moving, because the ground under it is tipping.

    That's a big clue.

  141. For Parrot Heads by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    .. if only to shout "Leonard Bernstein" at this point.

    I don't get it... Did Leonard Bernstein conduct REM or toss Michael Stipe into a volcano?

    Mostly we have earthquakes here in central California, but looks like the west coast is getting the east coast treatment. Two sets of earth quakes in 24 hours, centered around Parkfield (earthquake capitol of California, they say, dunno about you, but that sounds like a ringing endorsement for a place to live if ever there was one) plus another one near Bakersfield and I figure Mt. St. Helens has got nothing on us. Shakes to the left, magma to the right, it's more like Fins, but Volcano is probably more fitting. (BTW this new lameness minimum line-length thing is a real bugbear, how's someone supposed to post something valid without adding piles of unnecessary comments just to bloat the thing out to some arbitrary average length? It's the kind of thing Pythons careers were born lampooning. Were we not once criticized for writing run-on sentences and paragraphs -- maybe I should review Dead Poets Society stuff for measuring proper enjoyment of a poem with a ruler.) Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 39.6).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 39.6). It's like telling someone they're house is on fire, but they won't hear you properly unless you use proper manners (Excuse my interruption, kind sir, but your house is a great inferno and I beg you consider your options regarding the welfare of your family and posessions, like, totally forsooth and stuff like that there.) [this is for the lameness filter which utterly blows and encourages lots of unnecessary text to be inserted into a comment by some inexplicable logic to reign in people who do puny posts or obscene artwork, but is really a drag if you're trying to post a quote or some code which is formatted. I hope you enjoy this interlude as much as I did typing it.]

    Volcano -- Jimmy Buffett (Words and music)

    Now I don't know, I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    Let me say now I don't know, I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    Ground she's movin' under me
    Tidal waves out on the sea
    Sulphur smoke up in the sky
    Pretty soon we learn to fly

    Let me hear ya now I don't know, I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    Now my girl quickly say to me
    Mon you better watch your feet
    Lava come down soft and hot
    You better lava me now or lava me not

    Let me say now I don't know, I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    Mr Utley... (Michael Utley plays a piano instrumental)

    No time to count what I'm worth
    'Cause I just left the planet earth
    Where I go I hope there's rum
    Not to worry mon soon come

    Now I don't know, I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    One more now I don't know (ah he don't know)
    I don't know (he don't know, mon)
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    But I don't want to land in New York City
    Don't want to land in Mexico (no no no)
    Don't want to land on no Three Mile Island
    Don't want to see my skin aglow (no no no)

    Don't want to land in Commanche Sky park
    Or in Nashville, Tennessee (no no no)
    Don't want to land in no San Juan airport
    Or the Yukon Territory (no no no)

    Don't want to land no San Diego
    Don't want to land in no Buzzards Bay (no no no)
    Don't want to land on no Ayotollah
    I got nothing more to say

    I don't know, I don't know
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    Just a one more, I don't know (he don't know)
    I don't know (I don't know, man)
    I don't know where I'm a gonna go
    When the volcano blow

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  142. Unless... by wiredog · · Score: 1

    You're like Samuel Clemens. Born when Halley's Comet went by, died the next time it came 'round.

  143. Re:Locusts? That was back in May. by mforbes · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, maybe events like this (which occur at regular intervals of 17 years, for Brood X) aren't reported loudly outside the region in which they occur, but for about two months it was any of the talking heads on radio & TV would talk about in Northern Virginia.

    If you've never been in the area effected by Brood X during mating season, it's an amazing sound. Sort of like a 1950s era B movie soundtrack. Actually I heard a rumor (no verification, I have no idea if it's true or not) that that sound was actually used in at least one movie.

    --

    Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
    Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

  144. You do know what is under yellowstone, don't you? by abhikhurana · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is little known that lying underneath one of The United States largest and most picturesque National Parks - Yellowstone Park - is one of the largest "super volcanoes" in the world. Scientists have revealed that Yellowstone Park has been on a regular eruption cycle of 600,000 years. The last eruption was 640,000 years ago...so the next is overdue. The next eruption could be 2,500 times the size of the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption. Volcanologists have been tracking the movement of magma under the park and have calculated that in parts of Yellowstone the ground has risen over seventy centimeters this century. You can click on my signature for more information.

  145. Cool! by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1

    I was just up at the top a couple of weeks ago.

    Nice view, I might add. Too bad I don't have any of the pics online...

    Oh yea, it took me 6 hours to get to the top from the trailhead.

  146. wrong by Intraloper · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most people infected with West Nile, it seems, dont know they are sick. They might have a slight cold for a bit. some get very, very sick, and die. But a significant portion even of the young and healthy get serious, debilitating, flu-like symptoms that can last for weeks. My cousin is case 4 in Tehama County, California, this summer. She first went into the hospital about 3 1/2 weeks ago, is home now, but is STILL feverish, week, achy, head-throbbing headache, and describing it as like having a serious flu.. which has now lasted 3 1/2 weeks, unabated. She is in her 30s, healthy as a (irony only partially intended) horse, has not missed a day of work for illness in the previous decade. West Nile shouldn't panic us, be we DAMN SURE should be taking it seriously. All of us.

  147. On-Camera Volcanologists by lgordon · · Score: 1

    Since there's no hurricanes right now, maybe we can get one of those on-camera meteorologists from the weather channel to cover this from the top of the mountain? I'd recommend Stephanie Abrams, but it's too cold up there for her to wear anything skin tight. Also, I'd hate to see her die. Jim Cantore, on the other hand...

  148. The real reason for the earthquakes. by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

    Here is the real reason for the recent seismic activity at Mount St. Helens.

    - Jasen.

  149. Here come the red sunsets by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    ... well, maybe. Depends on how much dust it tosses up. Seem to remember that Pinatubo affected the sunset when it blew in the early 90's.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    1. Re:Here come the red sunsets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember that, but they were purple in my part of the world. Either way, very pretty.

      I hope this one is really spectacular.

  150. Forget locusts by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1


    It's the giant flies we should be worrying about!!

  151. baseline equilibrium vs perturbations by Intraloper · · Score: 1

    and geologic vs historic time. There are "natural" (non-human) processes that both release and sequester CO2. Volcanos are part of those natural processes. Because they are discrete events, they have short-term effects and create small spikes in atmospheric carbon (and other gasses), but over time (decades, centuries) they average well enough that they are simply part of the natural equilibrium. That equilibrium has been relatively constant(within about 50 ppm? if I remember right) over the last 400,000 or so years. Human activity is taking carbon that was sesuestered over gelogical time, tens of millions of years of time, that time being up to 100 million or so years ago, and sequestered from an atmosphere that was significantly richer in carbon that ours is... and we are releasing significant parts of that sequestered carbon in HISTORIC time, over a century or two, and THAT is significantly raising the equibilibrium carbon concentration in the atmosphere.

    1. Re:baseline equilibrium vs perturbations by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Preciseley. If things keep up this way, why, we MIGHT just get back the climate we had during the first part of the last millenium. You know, when Greenland was habitable and its name wasn't just propaganda...

  152. cats and dogs, living together.. Mass Hysteria!! by carn1fex · · Score: 1
    WINSTON

    Hey, Ray. Do you remember something in the Bible about the last days, when the dead would rise from the grave?

    RAY

    I remember Revelation 7:12. And I looked, as he opened the sixth seal, and behold, there was a great earthquake, and the sun became as black as sackcloth. And the moon became as blood.

    WINSTON

    And the seas boiled and the skies fell.

    RAY

    Judgment Day.

    WINSTON

    Judgment Day.

    RAY

    Every ancient religion has its own myth about the end of the world.

    WINSTON

    Myth? Ray, has it ever occurred to you that maybe the reason we've been so busy lately is because the dead have been rising from the grave? long pause

    RAY

    shivering

    How about a little music?

    --

    ---------

    No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  153. Re:You do know what is under yellowstone, don't yo by Quikah · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can get much more information about Yellowstone's volcanos from the Yellowstone Volcanoe Observatory website.

    --
    Q.
  154. It's a 3 now, not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Actually they upgraded to a 3 this morning, four is the highest. Monday on the news this was all no big deal, now the scientists seem a bit nervous. I work in Portland, no hysteria yet, the worry warts are quitely collecting supplies (we did yesterday, depsite living well south of Portland).

    The real danger is a large earthquake or Mt. Hood deciding that being 16,000 years overdue for an eruption is long enough and getting in on the action. The South Sister in Central Oregon has a gigantic bulge at its base, they said that it would go within 10 years, it's been nearly 20. Timberline Ski Resort has been trying to find a buyer lately, if the cost goes down to below $100 we are taking an out of state trip:)

    Moral of the story, have a 72 hour kit, you never know what services will be knocked out in an earthquake or something like this.

  155. Be scared of that other plague... by Uatu · · Score: 1

    Forget about those "plagues".

    If I lived in the USA (since there is where all these things are happening.), I would be scared of the death of the first born childs...

    That's the only downsize to be the first born of your siblings...

    Well, that and that your parents are newbies to all that parenthood crap...

    I mean, your brothers or sisters must have come out better, don't you think ?

  156. The 1980s blast was not considered that big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask a vulcanologist, they will tell you that the 1980s blast was not that big in eruption terms. It was mostly pyroclastic (isn't that the term for the hot gas eruption?) and was the equivalent of a loud burp compared to what could happen. I'm not even talking about worst cases like Mount Mazuma (now Crater Lake).

  157. Anne heshe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we need to get anne hashe, she can redirect the lava thru the storm drains so we can all be saved! ooh it getting hot around here anne, i think you need to take off all your clothes! OK! swweeeet! hey baby your looking kinda hot, wanna wrestle?

  158. Pictures posted in another comment by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

    I posted some pictures from a trip last summer. We were able to climb up to the rim, which is currently restricted due to the new activity. The comment with the pictures is here.

  159. MOD PARENT UP! +5 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP!

    I love that quote and GHOSTBUSTERS!

  160. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

    Early this year, a warning system (a bit like the tsunami system in the Pacific) has been put in place between Rainier and Seattle.

    Will it have the neat signs of someone running away from a wall of mud like the tsunami evacuation route signs? (I know, I shouldn't joke about such things, but I did find them extremely funny when I was out on the Oregon coast last summer).

  161. Rigged? by rxmd · · Score: 1
    God didn't say He planned all this destruction, He just predicted it. God doesn't want death, distruction or pain. We are living in a controversy between good and evil. If you want to blame the current events on someone, compare the world of perfect peace God has for us with what satan has organized down here.
    I don't know, the idea that the world is some kind of boxing match between the forces of Light and Darkness doesn't strike me as particularly convincing. Especially if you assume that the forces of Light have created those of Darkness and that the outcome has been predetermined by the forces of Light, too. Looks too much like a rigged match for my taste.
    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    1. Re:Rigged? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God did create satan(deceiver), but he created him as Lucifer(light bearer). He was the most highly honored being in the universe other than God. Satan made some bad choices and became who he is today. God has even offered the life of His own Son to show us how much He loves us and wants our friendship. If this was a rigged match, would God have offered so much?

    2. Re:Rigged? by rxmd · · Score: 1
      God did create satan(deceiver), but he created him as Lucifer(light bearer). He was the most highly honored being in the universe other than God. Satan made some bad choices and became who he is today. God has even offered the life of His own Son to show us how much He loves us and wants our friendship. If this was a rigged match, would God have offered so much?
      If this was not a rigged match, shouldn't the bible at least include the option of Darkness winning? At least in my Bible, the Revelation is quite clear on who wins in the end. And Jesus doesn't die as a kind of magical friendship offering, he dies to seal the New Covenant and redeem humanity.

      All this dualistic stuff about God vs. Satan is ridiculously medieval. The whole story of Lucifer becoming Satan is not biblical at all, it's basically a myth. Where is the story of Lucifer mentioned in the Bible? Don't answer "Isaiah 14:12" now, because that's a mistranslation in the King James bible; in the Hebrew original the text is about a Babylonian king who persecuted the Jews. Did you never wonder why Lucifer is a Latin name, while most of the Old Testament is in Hebrew or Aramaic?
      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    3. Re:Rigged? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For myself I get the story from a book called "The Great Controversy" by E. G. White. There is a lot of garbage out there about her, but when you really study her life, I believe she was inspired. But you are right. There is not much in the scriptures about the original controversy. Read in revelation though about the dragon sweeping a third of the stars from heaven and there not being room found for them, and it kinda paints a familiar story. It all forms a coherent picture that is satisfying for me. May God go with you.

  162. Decription of Alert Levels by kjfitz · · Score: 2, Informative

    From USGS Volcano-Warning Schemes in the United States (These are specific to the Cascade Range volcanoes in Washington and Oregon.):

    Notice of Volcanic Unrest Alert Level ONE

    This alert level is declared by USGS-CVO when significant anomalous conditions are recognized that could be indicative of an eventual hazardous volcanic event. The most likely such anomalous condition would be sustained, elevated seismicity. A "notice of volcanic unrest" expresses concern about the potential for hazardous volcanic activity but does not imply imminent hazard. Among the possible outcomes are: (1) anomalous condition is determined not symptomatic of an eventual hazardous volcanic event, leading to cancellation of "notice of volcanic unrest;" (2) symptomatic activity wanes, leading to cancellation of the "notice of volcanic unrest;" (3) conditions evolve so as to indicate progress toward hazardous volcanic activity, leading to issuance of a "volcano advisory" or "volcano alert."

    Volcano Advisory Alert Level TWO

    This alert level is declared by USGS-CVO when monitoring and evaluation indicate that processes are underway that have significant likelihood of culminating in hazardous volcanic activity but when the evidence does not indicate that a life- or property-threatening event is imminent. This alert level is used to emphasize heightened concern about potential hazard. Among the possible outcomes are: (1) precursory activity wanes, leading either to cancellation of the "volcano advisory" or to a downgrade of alert level to "notice of volcanic unrest;" (2) conditions evolve so as to indicate that a life-threatening volcanic or hydrologic event is imminent or underway, leading to issuance of a "volcano alert." "Volcano advisory" statements, supplemented as appropriate by "updated volcano advisory" statements will clarify as fully as possible USGS-CVO understanding of the hazard implications.

    Volcano Alert Alert Level THREE

    This alert level is declared by USGS-CVO when monitoring and evaluation indicate that precursory events have escalated to the point where a volcanic event with attendant volcanologic or hydrologic hazards threatening to life and property appears imminent or is underway. Depending upon further developments, a "volcano alert" will be maintained, updated, downgraded to a "volcano advisory," or canceled. A "volcano alert" statement will indicate, in as much detail as possible, the time window, place, and expected impact of an anticipated hazardous event. "Updated volcano alert" statements will amplify hazard information as dictated by evolving conditions.

  163. I for one.... by isotope23 · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our hurricane smiting, locust plaguing, fire and brimestone smiting, famine war and disease overlords......

    (I guess there was no mention about loss of broadband service during the apocalypse, because thats /.'s job!)

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  164. That, and about roughly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2000 Sasquatch in your immediate area.
    Enjoy.

  165. Re:Locusts? That was back in May. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean cicadas?

    They are harmless and tasty to animals.

  166. Take a look at the high resolution photos... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Some of them show what looks clearly like expansion fractures in the pack ice/snow surrounding the dome. The images (beware, they're 1MB and higher) are:

    ftp://ftpext.usgs.gov/pub/wr/wa/vancouver/MSH_Im ag es/MSH_aerial_crater_dome_9-29-04.jpg

    and

    ftp://ftpext.usgs.gov/pub/wr/wa/vancouver/MSH_Im ag es/MSH_crater_dome_glacier_west_side_9-29-04.jpg

    Looks like some definate expansion and shifting is going on.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  167. MOD PARENT UP by eingram · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. Grandparent post is wrong. Any quick Google search would show the same.

  168. I remember the 80 eruption - Spokane by Isando · · Score: 1

    I remember that day vividly. I was ten years old and my dad and I were on our garage putting up a basketball hoop, at our home in Spokane, Washington. I remember looking at the sky and saw dark, dark clouds, and told my dad it looked like it was going to storm so we better hurry. Almost immediately after that our eyes started itching terribly. We quickly finished installing the basketball hoop and then went inside to clean up. Dad turned on the tv and we saw the news, the volcano had erupted.

    Of course a little thing like a volcano couldnt keep my mother from dragging us to the local Fred Meyer for some shopping. On the way there, the ash started falling like snow. We were in there for about an hour. When we came out of the store we stopped in shock. Day had turned to night, and six inches of ash covered everything. We had to scoop it off our windows so we could drive home, and it was like driving through deep snow.

    For days we were told to stay inside until they could determine if the ash was the dangerous kind to inhale, or the not so dangerous kind to inhale. Ultimately I ended up being cooped up in the house for two weeks. No school, no going outside. As a ten year old I just about detonated.

    It sure was exciting, and somehow my parents made the whole thing kinda fun. We even built a paper mache volcano so my parents could explain to me what a volcano was and how it worked.

    Another eruption would almost be nostalgic. As long as no one is hurt.

  169. Re:Exciting! by Jupiter9 · · Score: 1

    I love time on my hands, but I have to spend a lot of time at work.

    --

    --
    Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
  170. What? by BashDot · · Score: 1

    Ground water dosn't "tip." The lake is moving because part of the landscape on one side of the lake is rising. Naturally, the water tries to move downhill as the hill rises.

  171. Linus, too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Linus just moved here, too...

  172. Re:Cool half-time show by DLR · · Score: 1

    That's one heck of a wardrobe malfunction that coming!

    --
    "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
  173. I Climbed Mt. St. Helens by stevok · · Score: 1

    ...less than a week ago, on Saturday Sept. 25th. There were a couple dozen quakes while I was on the mountain, but I didn't feel any of them as they were less than magnitude 2.5. Before we climbed, we were told not to look over the crater rim, as a steam explosion could hurl rocks at us. How counterproductive! Naturally, everyone looked anyway, because if there was an explosion, we wanted to see it. I climbed the mountain last year, and the weather was terrible. This time, it was perfectly clear, and I could actually see into the crater. (BIGGEST HOLE EVER) There were no signs of any gases escaping, although we could occasionally smell sulfur. It looked perfectly calm. Almost too calm... I live in Portland, and the winds say an ash cloud would head right towards us. I've got dust masks just in case...

  174. Volcanoes! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Consider the supervolcanoes, like the one under Yellowstone, on a 600,000 year cycle and due to blow RSN, geologically speaking.

    The last recent supervolcano class eruption was 70,000 years ago in Tova, which wiped out such a huge fraction of the human race that genetic historians note a bottleneck in the gene pool arising from that time.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  175. Seems to be steaming nicely right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or is that background weather on the webcam? I don't live near this volcano to know if this is a regular sight or not. Does St Helens push out steam clouds very often?

    1. Re:Seems to be steaming nicely right now... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      No. It is the weather here. The Pacific Northwest, especially at higher elevations, tends to be foggy in the fall. And winter. And spring. And some of the summer. ;)

    2. Re:Seems to be steaming nicely right now... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Nevermind. It's going off right now... 12:30pm PDT Friday.

  176. New Alert Level? by spungebob · · Score: 1

    So... does this mean we've escalated from "Blackwatch Plaid" to "The Cover of Rush's 'Moving Pictures' Album" Alert Level? ha-HAH!!

    --
    It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
  177. Mod parent up! by mikefe · · Score: 1

    If only I could...

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  178. In honor of Space Balls.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "She's gone from suck to blow!"

  179. Suspect terroists wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U.S Authorities are looking for 2 suspects in connection with seismic activity at Mount ST Helen.

    Law enforcement officials stated "2 people were seen in the area prior to the increase of seismic activities. We suspect they did something to cause this event."

    Government officials declined to comment specifically, but did state "We will do everything within our power to protect our country and to bring swift justice to those who threaten or harm it."

  180. It could be a moose... by kylegordon · · Score: 1

    When we visited the MSH visitor centers, one of the geologists from the days of original eruption was giving a talk about MSH. He describe how one day a about a year after the eruption had settled, a seismograph started going wild. A quick helicopter trip to the sight showed a moose using the seismograph housing as a scratching post. For all we know this could be blamed on the local wildlife settling in :-)

  181. 3 words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    liquid, hot, "magma"

  182. Please go vacation in Washington D.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In particular the White House.

  183. campfire! by uarch · · Score: 1

    Living only an hour or two from the volcano the only thought running through my mind is.... Where'd I put the marshmallows! Roasting marshmallows on a lava flow is just too cool to pass up.

  184. Re:Mt. Rainier even more potential than St. Helens by greggle · · Score: 1

    They were on Mount Adams.

    They stayed up for a bit as the ash cloud came toward them. Then they felt static electricity as lightning came from the ash cloud!

    Then they left real quick like.

    gregg

    --
    Work Hard, Rock Hard, Eat Hard, Sleep Hard, Grow Big, Wear Glasses if You Need 'Em.
  185. Keep clear of the east cost too! by simoncrute · · Score: 1

    If the Cumbre Vieja volcano on La Palma blows, it will cause a mega-tsumani that will wipe out most of the US easern sea board.

  186. Coralized link to webcam by valkraider · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Coralized link to webcam by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Here is the coralized link directly to the image, no surrounding page: MSH Webcam