Slashdot Mirror


Waterproof MP3 Player Uses Bone Conduction

An anonymous reader writes "Aquatic training product manufacturer Finis has just released a waterproof digital music portable for swimmers and surfers that claims to solve a problem with such devices in the water. Regular earphones don't work well because they need an uninterrupted air channel to function. What makes the SwiMP3 unique is that it uses bone conduction to stimulate the inner ear and deliver sound."

257 comments

  1. The only painful bit. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only painful bit is getting the 3.5mm jack inserted into the back of your skull.

    1. Re:The only painful bit. by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't a better spot be behind the ear or somewhere along the jaw line?

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:The only painful bit. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 0

      But the RIAA wouldn't have a direct connection to your neurals then.

    3. Re:The only painful bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? that makes no sense. This device uses an audio connection to bone, not an electrical one. The 3.5 mini jack would only provide an electrical analog connection, you'd still need an internal waveform producer.

    4. Re:The only painful bit. by supergiovane · · Score: 1

      It has never been a problem for me. Cordially yours, the goatse.cx guy.

      --
      Signatures are for stupids.
    5. Re:The only painful bit. by FlopEJoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      How does this affect the radio wave blocking abilities of my tin foil hat?

    6. Re:The only painful bit. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      If that were possible, believe me, I'd be the first in line. Screw headphones, speakers, monitors, televisions, etc... I want the data fed directly to my brain.

    7. Re:The only painful bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, OK, I'm going to piss in your mouth.

    8. Re:The only painful bit. by mikeage · · Score: 1

      The only painful bit is getting the 3.5mm jack inserted into the back of your skull.

      Just be grateful it's the back of your skull they're using. And it's only 3.5mm, and not 1/4", RCA, or direct speaker wires. Although, optical might not be too bad...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    9. Re:The only painful bit. by jdray · · Score: 2, Funny

      Plenty of storage space available, I'm guessing? :^)

      [/troll]

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    10. Re:The only painful bit. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem isn't how to pipe data directly to the brain. Hell, an electrode will do that just fine. The real technological feat will be delivering a signal to that part of the brain that can actually do something with it.

      Until then, we will have to be satisfied with tricking the senses.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    11. Re:The only painful bit. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ask Bush!

      That's how his "radio hump" worked withhout an earpiece...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:The only painful bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and internal wave form is clearly the thing that makes time travel possible

    13. Re:The only painful bit. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Must have been modded "Funny", 'cause you can't mpd "Scary".

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    14. Re:The only painful bit. by chawly · · Score: 1

      Grit your teeth - once a geek always a geek

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  2. But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I'm forever stimulating my bone. I don't need another device to do it for me.

  3. But how deep? by se2schul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cool, but how deep will it go? Can I bring it on a 300' deep scuba dive to entertain me during hours of long decompression stops?

    1. Re:But how deep? by RangerRick98 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gizmodo pointed out that they didn't mention any depth information in their press release, so it probably isn't designed for diving.

      --
      "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
    2. Re:But how deep? by se2schul · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps they just haven't considered the possibiliies that the bone conductive technology offers them. A scuba diver shouldn't put headphones in the ear, since the water pressure could force them into the ear causing damage (much the same reason a diver can't use ear plugs). With this bone conductive technology you could eliminate that problem. I'd imagine that all that would have to be done is to put the player in a pressure vessel, much like the underwater housings used for video cameras.

    3. Re:But how deep? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And to think that Jacques Cousteau called underwater The Silent World.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:But how deep? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that all that would have to be done is to put the player in a pressure vessel, much like the underwater housings used for video cameras. or simply inject the player with some kind of resin, since it doesn't need moving parts anyways the only concerns would be an lcd (replace with a button activated LED array?) and the battery (would pressure be an issue for it?)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:But how deep? by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1
      300'? I take it you're a professional diver then ;) I haven't been within 150' of that since I started diving!

      Presumably, if it's sealed and solid-state, you'd be able to take it however deep you wanted. The only problem would be finding an player that would both go that deep, and also contain the roughly seven gajillion hours of music needed for decompression from that depth.

      Apple could use this opportunity to develop a product for a new niche, and call it the iBathysphere. I can just imagine the tens of people who'd buy that!

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    6. Re:But how deep? by geordie_loz · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about this as I didn't read the PDF, but in order to create vibrations there might be moving parts to transfer the sound, even if only slight and small. perhaps the pressure would eliminate/reduce that vibration, thus no sound.

    7. Re:But how deep? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Hope you are using a mix instead of "normal" air... from what I remember about my scuba training (early 80s) is that normal air becomes lethal at extreme pressures, coincidentally around 300 feet...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    8. Re:But how deep? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1
      Gizmodo pointed out that they didn't mention any depth information in their press release, so it probably isn't designed for diving.

      That's too bad... it would make a great audio alert for when your air is running low.. or as a receiver for the surface people to use to contact you verbally..

    9. Re:But how deep? by pogofish · · Score: 1

      It's doubtful that it's capable of handling anything near that depth, but I can't find any sort of depth rating in their literature.

      BTW, here's another product based on bone conduction: a snorkle with an FM radio.

      --

      A man without a God is like a fish without a bicycle.
    10. Re:But how deep? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

      If you are doing regular 300' dives, you are probably diving closed circuit. One of my friends puts one of those pencil shaped mp3 players in the exhaust tube of his Inspiration.
      He can hear it fine, but the problem is.. so can everyone else :(

    11. Re:But how deep? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny
      There is not limitation to depth. The damn thing will go to the bottom of the ocean!

      Oh. You wanted it to continue to function...

      (If you are seriously diving 300', just put the sucker in your dry suit.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    12. Re:But how deep? by otterboy · · Score: 1

      I don't think it will go deep, but this one will:

      http://www.h2oaudio.com/products/i300dv.php

    13. Re:But how deep? by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "That's too bad... it would make a great audio alert for when your air is running low.."

      Listening to "Dark Side of the Moon" while cruising through blue space, narc'd and talking to the resident grouper of the local wreck.... Yum.

      "or as a receiver for the surface people to use to contact you verbally.."

      No! No no no! Ye gods no! Underwater is one of the few places the PHBs can't contact us! Please do NOT give them the ability to harsh my narc-buzz with their complaints that their "Internet" needs to be reinstalled! Gaaaaaah!

    14. Re:But how deep? by Slarty · · Score: 1

      The battery should be OK... battery-powered diving computers are used all the time in scuba these days. (Although I'm barely even a casual diver - can't afford to go much! - so I can't speak for the hard-core folk who do 300' dives. Deepest I've ever gone is 80', which is a whole different ballgame.

      Come to think of it those computers use LCD's too, so as long as those "scale" to farther underwater, no reason you couldn't have a decent underwater MP3 player. If this bone conducting thing works decently, the tech is all there. And that'd be pretty sweet... can't imagine listening to anything hardcore, but some nice classical would provide a nice backdrop to the purty fish and stuff you see. :-)

      --
      Hi... I'm Larry... the shivering chipmunk... brrrrr!... I'm cold... I need a sweater...
    15. Re:But how deep? by over_exposed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This would be more useful for swimmers. Either people doings laps or even better, synchronized swimmers. Now they can hear the music they're flailing around to.

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    16. Re:But how deep? by aLEczapKA · · Score: 0

      No way I would use it while diving... how else could I hear shark approaching me from behind?!

      --
      -- All Gods were immortal.
      -- S. Lem
    17. Re:But how deep? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Consider a speaker. It has the same fluid (air) on both sides of the cone. Underwater speakers would work the same way. It would have the same fluid on both sides of the cone, and thus the same pressure on both sides of the cone. The pressure becomes irrelevant.

    18. Re:But how deep? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Since the average scuba tank only holds about 30 minutes worth of air, depending on your breathing, which is barely enough to make it to 200ft and come straight back up...

      Yes. Feel free to take it down to 300' and spend hours coming to the surface. If it turns out the device doesn't function, you may return it for a full refund.

      I'm not sure what a decompression "stop" is, but feel free to make lots of those too.

    19. Re:But how deep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you don't know what a decompression stop is i suggest you go down as far as you can on your 30 minutes of air and then push off the bottom and swim up as hard as you can until you feel yourself get a little woozie but keep going until your eyes explode into the inside of the scuba mask....

    20. Re:But how deep? by se2schul · · Score: 1

      I hate it when people think they know what they're talking about. For dives I make to 300' on open circuit scuba, I'll often wear 6 or 7 tanks with the proper mixes. I don't do little bounce dives to 300, I do exploration dives with 20-30 minutes at that depth. BTW, a standard scuba tank lasts me 15 minutes at 200 ft, much more than just a bounce dive.

  4. Not new by WhatsAProGingrass · · Score: 5, Informative

    This may be new to the MP3 world, but this method is nothingnew.

    "The BAHA is a surgically implantable system for treatment of hearing loss that works through direct bone conduction. It has been used since 1977, and was cleared by the FDA in 1996 as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses in the United States. In 2002, the FDA approved its use for the treatment of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss." from here

    --
    Mark
    1. Re:Not new by cyberlotnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a new use of technologies
      It a mp3 player viable where it never was before
      It doesnt invovle implanting
      So while it may not be "new tech" it is "New and innovating use of that tech in an area it has never been used before"
      Next thing you know your going to say parents shouldn't get excited about having a baby because millions of people have them every day, its just another lifeform in the world nothing else.

    2. Re:Not new by HidingMyName · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall hearing about a sports radio (maybe with cassette player) for skiers (It looked like a scarf or a head band in the pictures) called the "bone phone", this was sold about 15 years ago if memory serves. However, googling on "bone phone" seems to bring up articles about more recent vintage Japanese cell phones using skeletal sound propagation.

    3. Re:Not new by cmcguffin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahhh, shades of the Bone Fone!

      Remember, kids, it's a "new concept in sound technology that may revolutionize the way we listen to stero music"!

      Today's marketing wonks have nothing on their late-70s brethren.

    4. Re:Not new by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1

      You're right. Nothing new here. I remember "swimmer's" FM radios that worked via bone conduction, from 25 years ago.

    5. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a new use of technologies
      It a mp3 player viable where it never was before
      It doesnt invovle implanting
      So while it may not be "new tech" it is "New and innovating use of that tech in an area it has never been used before"


      1979 bonefone

      Next thing you know your going to say parents shouldn't get excited about having a baby because millions of people have them every day, its just another lifeform in the world nothing else.

      Get sterilized and adopt a third world baby.

    6. Re:Not new by Inda · · Score: 1

      I believe it was happening way before that.

      Try as I might, I cannot find any relevent links, but I am sure Ludwig van Beethoven used Direct Bone Conduction to help him hear. He used one end of a broom stick on the piano and rested the other end on his upper teeth. This helped him hear the vibrations of each note.

      I could be wrong, but I'm sure I'm not. I remember seeing it on the TV. Can anyone back me up?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    7. Re:Not new by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      I remember the Bone-Phone back in the early days of the Sony Walkman it was kind of a collar that conducted sound into your collarbone and neck.

      My google came up with zillions of hits for new conductive cellphones using this principle, one reference from the movie "Dazed and Confused", but no pictures of it.

      The advantage was that you wouldn't have something over your ears so you could still here a car before stepping into the street. I only tried one once back then.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    8. Re:Not new by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know your going to say parents shouldn't get excited about having a baby because millions of people have them every day, its just another lifeform in the world nothing else.

      I'm a father and it's worse than that- a baby is just a screaming meatloaf until it can crawl on it's own and do cute things like kissing on command.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the world is overcrowded and none of them asked their parents to give birth to them, the parents just wanted them for selfish reasons

    10. Re:Not new by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      parents shouldn't get excited about having a baby because millions of people have them every day, its just another lifeform in the world nothing else.

      Actually, they shouldn't get excited that they have followed the ego-gratification of everyone else. 6 billion people in the world, and having kids is somehow something you're *supposed* to do.

  5. Great distraction! by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Oh to be a shark. The meat is much more tender without fear-induced adrenaline pumped into it.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Great distraction! by Negatyfus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great! Now I can finally experience a shark attack with the Jaws theme playing in the background!

    2. Re:Great distraction! by general_re · · Score: 1
      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    3. Re:Great distraction! by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      Too bad sharks don't have bones. They can't take advantage of this great technology.

  6. I'm sorry... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    But the mental picture of an iPod sitting in a fish tank conducting an orchestra with a bone is just...odd.

  7. Frequency response? by ByteSlicer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anybody here know the frequency response of cheek bone? I would expect it to filter high frequencies.

    1. Re:Frequency response? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Funny

      African or European?

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    2. Re:Frequency response? by warpSpeed · · Score: 2, Funny
      African or European?

      With or with out cocoanuts?

    3. Re:Frequency response? by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      Lol. I don't think swallows like to swim. Penguins on the other hand...

    4. Re:Frequency response? by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have obviously never had a root canal and crown put on.

      *cringes*

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    5. Re:Frequency response? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1


      BURMA!

    6. Re:Frequency response? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      " Does anybody here know the frequency response of cheek bone? I would expect it to filter high frequencies."

      When did you last see a dentist?

    7. Re:Frequency response? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Also, what effect does the extra layer of fat in the female cheek have on the sound quality?

    8. Re:Frequency response? by clickety6 · · Score: 1


      Nerd or Supermodel ?

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    9. Re:Frequency response? by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      You mean this one. I never saw it though. They should air more Monty Python stuff, it's been ages since I saw any of their movies on TV.

    10. Re:Frequency response? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      I think it will be ok, if you listen to heavy-bass throbbing techno only.

      Basically any music you want to feel rather than hear will be just fine.

      Seriously, it might be ok. The only experience I have that is close is using those car-stethoscopes - the ones with the metal rod that you can use to listen to engine noises. IIRC you can hear a pretty decent range of frequencies.

      In other words, I don't think it is the "frequency response" of your bones, so much as sound traveling thru different media.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    11. Re:Frequency response? by AltGrendel · · Score: 1
      Personally, I like coconuts.

      'specally the ones on the cute girls.

      --
      The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

      - Douglas Adams

  8. Where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Where would a swimmer put an mp3 player? It's not like there's some convenient pockets or anything.

    1. Re:Where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      RTFA, or at least, look at the pictures included WITH the article- It's strapped to the head - no pockets necessary

    2. Re:Where by frankvl · · Score: 1

      Implanted in his clothing of course! Oh, wait..

  9. It looks weird, but by Megaweapon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if it would also work in generally loud (and not underwater) areas where you don't want to block some sounds with regular earphones.

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    1. Re:It looks weird, but by Big+Nothing · · Score: 3, Informative

      Police and military units have used bone conducting equipment for quite some time for this particular reason; it doesn't block external sound, it works in noisy environments and it prevents eavesdropping.

      This particular product, however, seems (from the pictures in TFA) to be placed in front of the ears, and would therefore block external sounds. It might meet the two other criterion, though.

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    2. Re:It looks weird, but by tindur · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And does listening to this harm your ear like normal earphones or would this be a better alternative for those who like to listen to loud music?

    3. Re:It looks weird, but by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Well according to the doppler effect, yes. The same way a running faucet when you are standing at a sink will drown out somebody yelling to you from upstairs.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:It looks weird, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earphones don't harm your ear, loud music does. Some people just lack the brains to realize extremes are bad.

    5. Re:It looks weird, but by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I have friends who do mountain rescue work. They've tested a communication system (mike/phones) for use when the chopper is hovering loudly above. The 'phones' are flat and go under the top of the helmet, using bone conduction on the skull. They say it works but the helmet needs to be really tight making it unconfortable; or you need to press the device with a hand hard against your skull to hear. It was a couple years ago, so it may have improved.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    6. Re:It looks weird, but by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

      I would think your jawbones would get annoyed and you'd turn it down before it could do any damage to your ear...

  10. How does it sound by OglinTatas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How does it deal with the accoustics of bone instead of air? In my head, my voice sounds like a sexy baritone, but when I hear my voice in voicemail, it sounds tinny and whiney. My point is that sounds coming through the air sound a whole lot different than sounds that resonate in your head.

    1. Re:How does it sound by VivianC · · Score: 4, Funny

      In my head, my voice sounds like a sexy baritone, but when I hear my voice in voicemail, it sounds tinny and whiney.

      Maybe you need a better voicemail system...

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    2. Re:How does it sound by yecrom2 · · Score: 0

      Woody Allen reads /.
      I had no idea.

    3. Re:How does it sound by gazbo · · Score: 0, Interesting
      A little experiment for you:

      Take an electric motor from a remote controlled car, and wire it up to a 3.5mm jack. Stick the jack in a headphone socket, and then play some music - the motor won't spin, but it will vibrate. Now, gently bite the metal axle.

      Near-perfect sound! Ok, it's not exactly audiophile quality, but we're talking about biting a fucking motor here; stick some R&D time in like they have and I can believe it'll sound fine.

    4. Re:How does it sound by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      In my head, my voice sounds like a sexy baritone, but when I hear my voice in voicemail, it sounds tinny and whiney.

      I know what you mean, except visually. When I look at myself in a mirror I see a super studly alpha male. But in public, small children point and laugh at me. I curse thee, Narcissus!

    5. Re:How does it sound by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Free bass expansion! I have the same problem, except instead of sounding tinny, I sound like Fezzik. Anybody want a peanut?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:How does it sound by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back in 1983, I went on a guided tour of a panasonic site in japan. One of the things they demonstrated for me was a radio that used bone conduction. The cool thing was that you could place it anywhere on your skull and it sounded the same. I sounded at least as good as the walkmans at the time I was listening to. So it may not be able to do highs and lows very well, but neither can a lot of portable headphones. As a side benefit, it didn't leak sound the way most headphones do.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    7. Re:How does it sound by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Or a better head.

  11. Creepy sounds in my head! by RocketRainbow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No really, I'm serious! This is why speakers are so much more popular than headphones: the sound appears to be coming from somewhere! With good headphones, you can still get a reasonable effect (My sennheisers make it seem like the music is right there at the outside of my ears, which is just where I like it) but with direct stimulation it's just not pleasant to have directionless noise coming from outta nowhere!

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
    1. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even used the technology? It's useless speculation if you haven't.

    2. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by anethema · · Score: 1

      I would think it would be nice, but...i doubt the acoustics of bone are any good..as mentioned.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    3. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice try, but speakers are more popular than headphones for two reasons, and neither of them are that sound seems to come from somewhere. The first is that in-ear headphones tend to make the ear sore (unless you have expensive custom molded headphones) and headphones can only be two or at most three of the following things: Wireless, inexpensive, lightweight, or good quality. On the other hand, it's pretty easy to get decent quality speakers, as long as you're not looking for the super loud type, which are fairly small (Cambridge soundworks, anyone? though they're not so useful since they were acquired by creative) and inexpensive. Headphones are annoying in any form. People spend a lot of money to get immersive sound, they want the sound to be all around them. Headphones do provide that, but they're annoying. Personally, I'm looking forward to cochlear implants with an encrypted digital connection :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by olclops · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While true, the bigger reason that loudspeakers sound better than headphones is that your brain is used to processing sound with both ears. In other words, sound from loudspeakers sounds more natural because your right hear hears sound from both the left and right speakers, only it hears the right speaker louder and slightly sooner. (And, obviously, the reverse is true for the left ear). That's what creates the "stereo" effect. This isn't true with headphones - your right ear only hears the right channel. So for the vast majority of recorded material, when you listen in headphones, your brain interprets the sound as slightly wrong somehow.

      Some manufacturers of headphone amplifiers (http://headroom.headphone.com/) include a simple processor that feeds some of the left channel to the right headphone with the appropriate attenuation and delay, and vica versa. I use one of these and love it. The concious effect is subtle, but you find that you can listen to headphones for a much, much longer time before you get that "Aaaagh! Gotta take these off!" effect.

    5. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by sokoban · · Score: 1

      You can simulate speaker-type sound quite well with headphones. The way that audio-imaging works in the brain is by measuring differences in volume and time for audio signals to reach the ears. This makes it possible to accurately determine the direction from which a sound is coming as long as the wavelength of the sound is shorter than the distance between the ears (or is it half that distance?). Headroom (www.headphone.com) makes a lot of really nice headphone amps which have circuitry to simulate this effect. It really makes a huge difference in sound quality. I use one with my Sennheiser 600s and it is freakin awesome. Turning your head is a little wierd because the sound moves with it, but this kind of system would eliminate the "creepy sounds in my head" feeling. Check the website for better information regarding their systems.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    6. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you shure that bones don't give a hint from where sounds come from? I always wonder how can we distinguish top/bottom sounds (or front/rear) having just a left/right sensors!

    7. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 0

      Not quite to the fact that cheaper in-ear headphones are uncomfortable... I've got a pair of Sony MDR-EX51LP earbuds, and they generate great sound. With their design, they have a soft flexable rubber part that goes on the end (3 different sizes) that I've used for hours without any discomfort at all. Weren't that expensive, and have great bass response too.

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    8. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're just lucky. I've never been able to be comfortable with any off the shelf earbuds, and I've tried many in many different price ranges, including (back in the day) sony twin and triple turbo types... Maybe technology has marched on to the point where you can get soft earbuds cheaply now, but I suspect even those would irritate my ears in less than an hour.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by sahonen · · Score: 1

      I'm a musician and plopped down the cash for some Shure E5s for on-stage monitoring. They come with about 5 billion different ear tips that you can switch out to see which ones are the best for you. I've finally settled on the triple-flange ones, which are a bit of a pain to get in, but once you do, you get soooo much isolation it's not even funny, and they're fairly comfortable. Ultimate comfort, though, the expanding foam eartips. Can't even tell they're there, though not as much isolation.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    10. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Man, I had the same problems with earbuds, _nothing_ fit me right and it was a real pain to wear them.

      Someone told me to get a pair of Sony MDR-EX51LP Fontopias, sooo nice. $26 on Amazon. The only thing the "cord connecting left and right" is supposed to be worn in the back, and the main cable is a bit short.
      Whatever. I don't have to pack big ass headphones around anymore.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    11. Re:Creepy sounds in my head! by fshalor · · Score: 1

      I love my pair of sony 20$ (sd-18's I think?) Best set of comfortable, durable and flipable cans you can get.

      Due to some neck strain issues, I had to switch to a mic'ed headset (RTCW + TS) and went with some altec lansings. The're alright, but at twice the cost of the verenable sony's the're about 1/3 the quality of sound.

      I've used my sony's everywhere (including a trip to australia) and for field day (24 hours of straight listening to noisy signals via ham radio.)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  12. Bonephone radio reprise by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Bonephone idea seems to pop up every few years (back to the 70s at least) and never seems to catch on.

    I can't see listening to music in the pool being a killer-app for it, but maybe the RIAA lawyers won't want to get their suits wet coming in after you.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Bonephone radio reprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "RIAA lawyers won't want to get their suits wet coming in after you."

      ...But RIAA lawyers get wet coming after people anyway, right?

    2. Re:Bonephone radio reprise by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      Yes. Sharks are very much afraid of the water.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
  13. Better yet by vanourek · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am holding out for the lotion-proof OGG player. It's got to support that bone thingy too.

  14. Metal Gear Solid by Guitar+Wizard · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If I am correct, this is along the exact same lines as the earpiece that Solid Snake wore in Metal Gear Solid for the PlayStation. It vibrated the bones in his ear so he could hear incoming transmissions "simulated" in his head, keeping the noise level down for stealth-factor.

    This seems like a very cool and promising technology...I'm glad to see it finally entering the consumer market.

    --
    Two freaks, no foes. It takes absolutely nothing to make some people angry.
    1. Re:Metal Gear Solid by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      Not sure how to take your comment - but I wonder if an mp3 player like this (complete with bone conduction) could actually be made small enough to be embedded under the skin and thus be completely invisible? perhaps it could recharge by induction and be accessed (for uploading tunes etc) via bluetooth. Is this possible with todays technology?

      Nick ...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:Metal Gear Solid by Worminater · · Score: 1

      ... Just think about having something like that inbedded in my skull conjures up images of tumers growing at the base of my skull, spreading... cell phones are known to cause them, what would inbedded wireless tech do...?

  15. Old news, used to be "swim-band" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    And it was done in the 80's. For awhile they were hocked on uhf channels before dissapearing completely from the marketplace, about a decade ago. There was a "design" patent on file for the thing, though it may well have expired by now. And yes, it was cool to listen to music underwater.

  16. BonePhone by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

    The bone phone marketed to "Joggers" back in the '80's IIRC used the smae method of sound transmission.. I have no idea how well it worked...

    1. Re:BonePhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you how well it worked: it sucked! Bone conduction my ass! It sounded like a cheap, tinny transistor radio, whether you wore it around your neck or not - it made no difference whatsoever. My boss ordered it for $75. Minutes after he and the rest of the office tried it out, he offered to sell it for $50. There were no takers. I suspect that this new gadget is the same old scam.

  17. Hm... by cuteseal · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder where you store the player while swimming? Is that a mp3 player down your swimming trunks or are you just happy to see me? :)

    1. Re:Hm... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      They showed a picture with it worn on the back of the swimmer's head. The bone stimulator was cheekbone-mounted.

      I'm thinking that would cause lots of drag, the way it looks.

    2. Re:Hm... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Both. You are an awfully cute seal, after all.

    3. Re:Hm... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      They probably shouldn't have called it the Swim-Pee-Three.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  18. I wonder what the sharks like best? by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... a waterproof digital music portable for swimmers and surfers ...

    I wonder what sort of music the sharks prefer with dinner? Maybe the theme from a lawyer show like LA Law?

  19. This is just another example of... by igrp · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... military technology eventually being used in civilian applications. The SEALs have used bone conduction for a while now. And according to the Navy Wire Service this technology has already been transfered to other fields, namely, to be used by emergency response personell. So this is just the next step...

    Bone conduction is actually a pretty good idea: the ear drum is too close to the density of the water to stop any sound wave when in immersion. The bones are hard enough to stop the fast sound waves though. Basically the bones from the neck and skull resonate and carry the vibrations.

    1. Re:This is just another example of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hardly new technology, nor the first civilian application. Check out the 1979 bonefone.

    2. Re:This is just another example of... by relaxmax · · Score: 1
      Basically the bones from the neck and skull resonate and carry the vibrations

      You mean to say that it is normal for my neck and head to vibrate at maximum amplitude? I thought there was some disease that caused it... what was it again... Parkinson's of the neck/head?!

      --
      Love all, Trust few, Follow one.
    3. Re:This is just another example of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually just another example of the inane.

      MP3 players for swimmers... Yeah, I just can't enjoy coral reefs without my tunes. What I really hate though is not being able to listen to music when I'm outside the spacecraft replacing a solar panel, or that boring music-less 75 seconds of freefall windnoise while waiting to pull the ripcord. If I can't listen to music while I'm doing it, it's just not worth it.

  20. All the Tri-Geeks will have one of these... by RobL3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I belong to a very rare subset of Geek known as the Tri-Geek. Guide to spotting the Tri-Geek - bike on car cost more than car, Wetsuit hanging in cube, funny tan lines, %10 body fat, empty Gu packs lying around instead of coffie cups and... an obsesive compulsive need to have the best, coolest, newest equipment available. I WILL have one of these! I don't care if it only holds 16 megs, they're going to sell a ton to people just like me. Now I'm off to find the credit card I hid from myself...

    1. Re:All the Tri-Geeks will have one of these... by canoe_head · · Score: 1

      True dat yo...

      between my HRM, S&D, and bike computer I think I have more computing power than the space shuttle. Finally something to go along with me in the pool. Like I needed another excuse to spend more money on gadgits.

    2. Re:All the Tri-Geeks will have one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God man. Take the websuit off and actually take the time to read over your post.

    3. Re:All the Tri-Geeks will have one of these... by RobL3 · · Score: 1

      ....Websuit? Hi pot, meet kettle....

    4. Re:All the Tri-Geeks will have one of these... by Powercntrl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I belong to a very rare subset of Geek known as the Tri-Geek.

      I'm a more common type of geek. I sit on my fat ass in a nice air conditioned car listening to my non-waterproof iPod. If it has wheels and can seat a passenger, it must have an engine or I will not own it. I won't be buying this MP3 player.

      Different target markets, I guess.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    5. Re:All the Tri-Geeks will have one of these... by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1
      don't care if it only holds 16 megs, they're going to sell a ton to people just like me.

      Yep. And hopefully all four of you will then spend your free time underwater listening to music instead of strutting around pretending to be better than those of us who choose other methods of recreation.

      Sheesh. Freakin' energy-drink buyin' volkswagen drivers with iPods. There's an island for all of you somewhere.

    6. Re:All the Tri-Geeks will have one of these... by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      Don't forget: wearing socks with sandals! And for the hardcore, black socks with sandals.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
  21. Exhalation bubbles by retostamm · · Score: 1

    make a very loud noise if you try to listen to something while swimming. And it does not matter if you wear earplugs or not.

    Does this solve this problem as well, or will I hear a second of bubbles followed by a second of "expected" sound?

  22. This is NOT unique! by Systems+Curmudgeon · · Score: 4, Informative

    A product that was poorly marketed in the late 1970's was called the "Bone Phone." It was a walkman-style audio player intended for runners, and you heard the music through your bones (no earpiece). I believe it was invented by a Princetonian. If any patents are claimed on this, there is prior art! - systems curmudgeon, AKA: The Precision Blogger http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com

    1. Re:This is NOT unique! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bone Phone."

      Yeah, my ex-wife used to play with mine but it never actually reached all the way from her ear to her mouth. Says she gets long distance with her new boyfriend's.

  23. wtf ? by sla291 · · Score: 1

    Does it work well when you aren't in the water too ? Seems to be the most useful situation :/

  24. IDEA NOT NEW by gp310ad · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bone Fone is a 70's example employing acoustic conduction through the body as opposed to the evolutionary air to ear route.

    WW-II AT&T 'throat microphone' also made use of 'conductued' sound and it was common for early (20's) radio operators to place their headphones on skull or jaw behind ears rather than over ears. This afforded some degree of 'automatic volume control', protected them from loud static crashes, and made it easier to discern a weak signal when near a strong one.

    Back when I swam a lot we puT speakers inside plastic bags and hung them ver the side of the pool. It was OK when both ears were under water but not practical for listening while swimming. Combined with speakers above the water it wasn't much better. Swimming is pretty noisy and indoor pool acoustics generally suck.

    --
    Do not look into LASER with remaining eye!
    1. Re:IDEA NOT NEW by Peepsalot · · Score: 1

      Bone Fone? We are talking about mp3 players here, not phone sex numbers.
      Can't we go one article without someone making a totally offtopic comment about sex? Sheesh, some people.

    2. Re:IDEA NOT NEW by bazmonkey · · Score: 1

      The point isn't that this is all-new technology. The point is that no one ELSE made an mp3 player like this... no one else has an mp3 player for underwater use.

    3. Re:IDEA NOT NEW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember those! My cousin had one.

  25. Music in my head? by palad1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll first have to ask Frank if he doesn't mind the company in there.

  26. As a “schizophrenic”... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I found the change refreshing....

  27. Why bother? by pklong · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What does society have against silence? Everywhere you go you are bombarded with music. At work you have the radio or hi-fi blaring. At home you have telly on permanently or your hi-fi blaring. When you go shopping you are subjected to muzac. In the car you have the radio/cd on.

    Everywhere we are bombarded with mindless noise.

    Now you can't even go swimming without having your mp3 collection zapped into your inner ear. Insanity.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Why bother? by jstave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm missing something here. Is someone being forced to do this? I used to work next to a guy who would play his music so loud that I could hear his earphones from the next cube over. I'd have loved it if he used bone conduction so that I could work in silence.

    2. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about for people who are in the pool 3-4 hours per day, or even 3-4 hours per week?

    3. Re:Why bother? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of us have a choice whether or not we want music on at work. At home you have the ability to turn your TV or radio off. In the car you can easily turn off your stereo. You have the choice whether or not you want to listen to music in the pool.

      And many of us don't listen to "mindless music"... many listen to classical, jazz, or even audio books (I'd love to get through an extra book a week during my swimming time).

      I sure hope you were trolling, cause otherwise you need to think about things a little more before you write them.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Why bother? by pklong · · Score: 1

      No. I was making a point about modern society. I didn't say mindless music, I said mindless noise. Listen to Fox news or just about any radio DJ and you'll see what I mean. But I suppose Britney Spheres is pretty mindless ;)

      As far as the 'invention' is concerned, are you really deprived by being separated from your electronic pacifier for a few minutes in the morning or are you just buying a gadget to show off and attempt to look cool "Look at me I've got an expensive piece of tat attacted to my noggins"

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    5. Re:Why bother? by reedmon29 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Music has a sort of "soothing" effect I guess. I work best when I'm listening to my favorite genres. It may be mindless noise, but it helps me, and it releives boredom.

      I don't swim, but I can't see swimming for 4 hours straight, lap by lap, to be extremely exciting.

      And what do you mean you "can't even go swimming without having your mp3 collection zapped into your inner ear"? I still do. I go to classes without music. Listening to music for me at least is a choice.

    6. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These noise-aholics, these quiet-aphobics

    7. Re:Why bother? by rthille · · Score: 1

      Well, since I'm training for a triathlon in 10 days, I've been spending a lot of time biking, running and swimming. Biking is somewhat entertaining, but I find running and (especially pool) swimming to be nearly terminally boring. Being able to listen to music while I swim would probably help with that. Or moving someplace where the ocean water temperature is over 40F...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    8. Re:Why bother? by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1
      I sure hope you were trolling, cause otherwise you need to think about things a little more before you write them.

      You must be new here. :-)

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    9. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As far as the 'invention' is concerned, are you really deprived by being separated from your electronic pacifier for a few minutes in the morning or are you just buying a gadget to show off and attempt to look cool "Look at me I've got an expensive piece of tat attacted to my noggins"
      Gee, are those my options? I'll go with "expensive piece of tat".
  28. Also could be good for certain types of hearing lo by rickthewizkid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could also be useful for folks with certain types of conductive hearing loss, such as Treacher collins syndrome, which generally results in small, or no external ear structures, and other similar conditions.

    This technology has been used in some types of hearing aids for years - again, for people who have small or missing external ear canals.

    Just my winamp-in-a-headset's worth.
    RickTheWizKid

  29. Is that an mp3 player in your swimming trunks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that a mp3 player down your swimming trunks or are you just happy to see me? :)

    Talk about bone...

  30. Bone conductance cell phone by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Bone Phone . I wonder if that works in the pool too? I can see it now: "Can yub hear bee nowub?"

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  31. Why not? by Meostro · · Score: 1

    Regular earphones don't work well because they need an uninterrupted air channel to function.

    Some acoustic physicist please explain to me: Why wouldn't earphones work better underwater? AFAIK sound is propagated through compression waves, so it should work fine underwater as the density is greater. Am I missing something?

    I remember being underwater in a swimming pool years ago, and I heard a watch alarm beeping. It was very clear, like it was next to me, but I found out that it was practically on the other end of the pool!

    It's also the same basic concept used by some torpedoes (IIRC), you don't actually have to hit the bad guy's sub, you just have to explode close to it and the water will carry the shockwave right through 'em.

    1. Re:Why not? by pomakis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Some acoustic physicist please explain to me: Why wouldn't earphones work better underwater? AFAIK sound is propagated through compression waves, so it should work fine underwater as the density is greater. Am I missing something?

      I'm guessing that they would work better underwater if there was an uninturrupted water channel. But I'm guessing the problem is that when you go swimming, especially if you're wearing earphones or earbuds, there's bound to be a lot of trapped air in your ears along with the water that gets in. It's probably that composite environment that causes the problem.

    2. Re:Why not? by melandy · · Score: 1
      Some acoustic physicist please explain to me: Why wouldn't earphones work better underwater? AFAIK sound is propagated through compression waves, so it should work fine underwater as the density is greater. Am I missing something?

      IANAAP (acoustic physicist), but it's not really a matter of the sound transmission properties of water, more a matter of the physical structure of the earphones.

      If they were designed to operate by oscillating against air, then trying to operate by oscillating against water (which is more dense, as you stated) won't work... at least not as well.
    3. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In reality, the density of water causes 'sound waves' to be transmitted at a much greater speed that that of Air. Because the Human body has evolved to adapt to Air based sound, underwater sound cannot be processed properly by our air-adapted eardrum and inner-ear.

      Look it up yourself. The speed of sound (I don't have an exact figure) underwater is much higher and thus, different.

  32. Seems bulky... by Leadhyena · · Score: 1

    I think I'll wait for the reviews on this one... while I don't mind the bone-conductive sound, the unit looks really bulky to me. Being a masters swimmer who practices 4-5 times a week, even though the thought of music in the water is thrilling, the unit seems like it'd be irritating to those who don't wear a cap or earplugs to have anything foreign feeling around the goggles, IMHO. Anyone here ever try these things on?

  33. As the original poster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to express my appreciation for your work. And if you're ever in town, I've got something cold, sharp, and 3.5 mm long I like to show you.

  34. Not unique or new... by olympus_coder · · Score: 2, Informative

    The H2Audio underwater mp3 system as been out for scuba diving for a while (a year?) and uses a hydrophone I beleive. They sit on the outside of the ear (you can't put anything in the ear as changing pressure might force it into the ear).

    Oceanic Scuba Equipment

    --
    Spell check? Why bother. That is what grammer/spelling Nazi freaks who waiste band width posting "spell right" are for.
  35. So now instead of blowing out your headphones by xThinkx · · Score: 1

    You can blow out your eardrums.

    YAY TECHNOLOGY.

    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
  36. Return of the Bonephone by litac · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, yeah - others have mentioned it, but my first thought when I saw the headline was - someone else is trying to bring back 70's tech. I remember first seeing ads for the Bonephone in Omni Magazine. They were marketed as the geek's alternative to the uber-cool Walkman. The version I recall was a long flat unit that you wore around your neck, with the sound emitters resting one your collar bone. I also seem to recall that it was pulled from the market because people were experiencing bone damage (spontaneously breaking collar bones, etc), but that might be urban myth.

  37. MGS by accelleron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Colonel: Snake! Can you hear me?
    Snake: I tried so hard... in the end... doesn't really matter...
    Colonel: Snake?
    Snake: I had to fall... lose it all...
    Colonel: Who the f**k gave him an MP3 player?!
    Naomi: err...

    --
    Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    1. Re:MGS by geeveees · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Linkin Park - In The End, for those that wonder, a great song (like all the others of LP)

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
    2. Re:MGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope that snake would listen to a band better that the pile of shit that is linkin park.

  38. Nothing new.... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Remember the "Bone Fone"???? (warning, nostalgia page!)

  39. Re:BoneFone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    (dating myself)



    One handed typist huh, sorry couldn't resist.

  40. Limited Functionality by Opalima · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only 30 songs? How many laps of the wading pool is that exactly? I find it unusual that the unit holds such a limited number of songs.

    1. Re:Limited Functionality by igrp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, at least in theory, you could use low-bitrate mono MP3s without any loosing any quality. With bone conduction, there is only a single source of transmission and not two (ie. your ears).

      A MP3 played on this player will sound like it's "all around you", coming from all directions. It's omniphonic sound. That's why there's not really a point in having stereo MP3s. You could convert them to mono and squeeze in more songs.

    2. Re:Limited Functionality by reedmon29 · · Score: 1

      My current MP3 player has only 32 meg on it... it goes for about 2 hours until it has to repeat on 32 bps. 256 meg would be a miracle for me... if it didn't look so freaking dorky.

    3. Re:Limited Functionality by bbuchs · · Score: 0

      Well, we're not talking about going out and running for 2 hours. Your average Joe - at least the average Joe who's reading slashdot and spending $300 on a geek toy like this - is probably going to swim for an hour at a crack, tops. Plenty of capacity for that.

      Then again, if your name is Phelps or Thorpe, you're spending a little more time in the water than that.

  41. possibilities for hearing impaired? by CrudPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I wonder about the possibilities of this technology for certain types of hearing impairment.

    my bone-conduction hearing is far better than my air-conduction hearing in tests. they could be onto something here...

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
    1. Re:possibilities for hearing impaired? by Mattcelt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the cochlear bones are damaged, then even bone-conduction won't help with hearing, because it is those three bones that do the actual conversion of air pressure to electrical signals that the brain can decode as sound. Without those specific bones to do the conversion, doing bone conduction is no more useful than, say, holding your fingers up to a person's throat while they're speaking and feeling the vibrations they're making. While it's a useful thing in certain circumstances (and therefore an idea not totally without merit), it's nowhere near the same as true hearing.

      Sorry to burst your bubble! Rest assured that it took me a looong time when I was young to understand that my grandmother (whose was deaf from birth) could feel sound, but couldn't hear it.

    2. Re:possibilities for hearing impaired? by CrudPuppy · · Score: 1

      most people with sensorineural loss do not have conduction problems (myself included). as long as the frequency response of these "earphones" can extend to even 8000Hz they would be useful for amplifying human speech. but they must be fairly responsive of they wouldnt be used in this product for conveying music.

      The more I think about it, the more interested I become!

      --
      A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
    3. Re:possibilities for hearing impaired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any implications for nerve deafness/tinnitus? Regular headphones hurt my ears and cause ringing because I overused bad headphones when I was younger. I'm not alone, I suspect...

    4. Re:possibilities for hearing impaired? by vonholst · · Score: 1

      It has allreadu been done. A teacher at our university is involved with such a project. http://www.s2.chalmers.se/~stenfelt/baha.html

    5. Re:possibilities for hearing impaired? by tommyboyprime · · Score: 1

      This has been used already for hearing impairment. The equipment was kludgy however and didn't get widespread use. New tech however may make it popular again with less noticable transducers.

      --
      This parrot has ceased to be!
    6. Re:possibilities for hearing impaired? by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Actually there are bone conducted hearing aids being used - my friend has one - info here about BAHA (BAHA = bone anchored hearing aid). Of course it is only useful in some situations, it isn't in mine but for me, a cochlear implant helps.

  42. medical issues? by ifnkovhgroghprm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've seen a bunch of devices lately that transmit signals through the body in various ways. This one uses your bones to transmit audio. I'm wondering if they've done enough analysis to see what kinds of medical problems might pop up after prolonged use of this device. I wouldn't want rapid onset of osteoporosis to occur because of an MP3 player...

    1. Re:medical issues? by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm wondering if they've done enough analysis to see what kinds of medical problems might pop up...

      Here, you can test this yourself:

      Stick your fingers in your ears and hum.

      Dead yet? Keep tryin'...

    2. Re:medical issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's well and good for humming Gilbert and Sullivan with my finger in my ear, but what about blasting Spineshank or Static-X at top volume? Yeah, it's probably not great for my ears with regular headphones, but my *skull* with these?

    3. Re:medical issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that is possible. Sound travels through our bodies constantly. I've let farts loose that have rattled my teeth - yet I can still do a mile in five minutes on my Segway.

      Luckily I can drown out the annoying whine of my human transporter with my human Hi-Fi.

    4. Re:medical issues? by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Stick a vibrator in your ear and leave it on for two weeks and tell me if it feels funny.

      (BTW, I'd recommend against using a used vibrator)

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  43. I like the way you think! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always said that the best place to mount any control interface is on the back of your head!

  44. They like the Austim Powers Theme by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    so they can dream about one day having frickin' laser beams attached to their heads.

  45. Ah, a modern version of the 'bone phone' by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though most of you here are too young to reemember it, there was a product that used 'bone conduction' back in the early 80's..

    Sold by DAK and later ( i think ) sharperimage..

    It was a radio.. And it fit over your neck like a towel.. And rather expensive from what i remember, but cool

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  46. Underwater Speaker by alatesystems · · Score: 2

    I think it would be more fun to have an underwater speaker that uses the water to conduct the sound. I remember I was in a pool once and someone at the other end of the pool heard my hour chime under water. It seems that water carries sound much better than air, but IANAP(physicist).

    It would be neat to blast music to people underwater, and when you came out of the water you wouldn't be able to hear it at all.

    I'm sure I'll get modded off-topic, but it still seems like a good idea.

    1. Re:Underwater Speaker by Zerth · · Score: 1

      They make those, although they can be pricey.

      For example, Tactile Sound makes them.(I'm reading from work, so I have to yank the company chain)

    2. Re:Underwater Speaker by stud9920 · · Score: 0
      It seems that water carries sound much better than air, but IANAP(physicist).
      It also carries sound four times as fast, which is why your brain is too slow to echolocate the source as accurately.
    3. Re:Underwater Speaker by NickRipley · · Score: 1

      I manage a small record label, and one of our artists, Donna Killington, has recorded several songs by submerging a speaker and microphone (in shrink wrap, or a garbage bag, of course) and recording some sounds being played through the water.

      If you are interested, check out some free mp3's.

      --Nick

      --
      http://cassettefetish.com
    4. Re:Underwater Speaker by DJCF · · Score: 1

      (Hoping this isn't off-topic...)

      Yes, water travels many times better through water than air (but IANAP). I used to play a game where I'd set my watch alarm for about 10 seconds, then through it in the water and wait for it to go off. Then first one to get to the watch after it starts beeping wins. I still have that watch...

      On the other end of the spectrum, in emergencies the BBC submerges microphones in condoms if they need underwater recording. Douglas Adams has a hilarious account of trying to buy a condom in China in order to record the sounds of the Yangtze River Dolphins in his book "Last Chance to See".

  47. Music jokes by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1
    Bring on the music jokes of
    • Händel
    • Beach Boys
    • Jaws theme
    • Waterboy Soundtrack
    • Etc.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  48. dang, still no ogg support by sxpert · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'd get one right away if it featured ogg...
    if it doesn't do ogg, it doesn't get my money. as simple as that

  49. source for BC mics by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know a source for bone conduction microphones? I'd like to play around with them with some electronic projects. So far the only ones I've found are already attatched to really expensive devices.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:source for BC mics by pixelphsr · · Score: 1

      Try these guys...

      http://www.clearercom.com/index.htm

  50. Wow, the Pixies were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your bone's got a little machine.

  51. bone phone's by BeannieBrewer · · Score: 0

    will the vibration go through the water as well? Will dolphins be able to pick up da' funk with us?

    --
    Thanks, Beannie
  52. Still not new by poptones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Twenty years ago a company that ran ads in all the gadget magazines offered a "bone fone." It was marketed most directly to skiers as a means of listening to their music while skiing without having to muck with earphones and cables.

    Even ignoring the potential problems for folks with inner ear troubles who want to dive (the music via bone conduction could contribute further toward disorientation and dizziness from such problems) the sound via this method sucked then, I suspect it will still suck now. There's a great step from "Wow I was deaf and now am able to hear!" to "...and I want to pay money to listen to lo-fi music through this thing while I'm diving (or any other time) because...?"

    I have a pretty messed up right ear and I am a terrible swimmer, but even still I love the water. One of the things I love most is the difference in sound between out of the water and underwater. Why would anyone want to interrupt that rare peace with noise from the terrestrial world?

    1. Re:Still not new by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone gave one of those to me. Saying "the sound via this method sucked" is a vast understatement. If you knew the music well enough, the bone fone would give you just enough hints to fill in the rest with your imagination. A better description might be to say it sounded like listening to the radio being played in the car next to you at the stoplight (with both of you having your windows up).

    2. Re:Still not new by FrankHaynes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more!

      The sound perceived by bone conduction is typically lo-fidelity, mostly the lows and mid-range frequencies are heard, but the highs are basically non-existant.

      Despite the fact that when most people say 'mp3' these days they expect us to think 'music' (or even 'pirated music'!), I see this as a potential boon to Masters swimming instructors. I will soon be joining a Masters swim team simply to improve my breathing technique and to learn how to turn, and from what I have seen it seems pretty silly to have the instructor screaming at the top of his lungs for the few milliseconds that a swimmer's ear is above the surface while taking a breath.

      This device could allow the instructor to issue guidance and instructions pretty much full-time to an immersed swimmer. Now THAT would be a practical and useful application.

      As for surfing (the REAL kind of surfing where you get wet, not sitting on your fat ass browsing web pages), I know that Craig, Topher, Buddy, Beaker, and Vax would miss my various renditions that I sing while we're out in the lineup waiting for a waves, so I'll pass on this device for that application. Besides, it's healthier to be able to hear the maladjusted sociopath who is threatening you for surfing "his break".

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    3. Re:Still not new by jdray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would hope it would be good for surf-zone kayaking, too. Generally, people out kayaking don't want to be bothered with music, but communication is a huge issue. Those "waterproof" FRS radios don't work past your first wet exit, which is when you need them most.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    4. Re:Still not new by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 2

      One of the things I love most is the difference in sound between out of the water and underwater. Why would anyone want to interrupt that rare peace with noise from the terrestrial world?

      You'd want to do so because lap-swimming is incredibly boring, and if you're at a practice or are swimming to work out, you're probably just hearing whatever music the lifeguard's got on, or noise from whomever's in the pool area. There's a huge transformation that takes place when you go from being a recreational swimmer to a competitive one. Largely, you don't tend to just "play" in the water anymore, because you're conditioned to get in and do laps. You tend to trade one sort of fun for another, but that generally comes during meets. Practice is still boring.

      I used to swim competitively, and now do so just to stay in shape. I'd love one of these things, if the price came down a little and the sound was good. I find that stroke-stroke-stroke-flip gets boring after the first mile or so. ;)

    5. Re:Still not new by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'd love one of these things for my morning lap-swims before work. The only downside I could see would be that I would probably lose track of my count of how many laps I'd done more often... :P

    6. Re:Still not new by beanluc · · Score: 1

      > magazines offered a "bone fone."

      Actually this is a different innovation, it's done with 900# technology.

      --
      Say it right: "Nuc-le-ah Powah".
  53. Sharks are right at home in water by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Produced by Stevel Spielberg

    RIAA

    Opens with couple on a beach the young woman goes swimming and dons her Swimp3. At first everyhing is nice and romantic but then we hear the music. From the bottom of the sea comes mean ultimate terror. The LAWYER.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  54. RTFA? by poptones · · Score: 2, Funny

    You really should. This post was not "interesting" but the picture that answers your question (the one you see when you rtfa) is worth the click. Man does that thing look stupid. I mean, most swimgear looks pretty stupid, but this thing is remarkably stupid looking. They couldn't make it flatter and less conspicuous? The only way they could have made it stupider would have been to stick it in a fin... but even that would at least be stupid and funny.

    1. Re:RTFA? by nodnarb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps building the player into the silly little cap that she's wearing in the picture (found here for anyone else who's not quite smart enough)

  55. Alarm Clock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would love to see this technology used for some sort of alarm clock. There've been many times when I've had to try and catch a few winks in a very noisy environment. I've considered ear plugs but never tried it because I wasn't sure if the alarm would still wake me up. This would allow you to wear ear plugs to sleep and still hear an alarm to wake you up.

  56. Too big... by pixelphsr · · Score: 1

    to fit under a motorcycle helmet.

    This would be great if I could disconnect the ear- (bone?) phones from their player. Maybe hook them up to an iRiver iFP-899 with a gig of music.

  57. You Don't Know Where That Thing's Been by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    The waterproof mp3 player reminds me of the Finger Phone. At least with the mp3 player you don't have to walk around with finger stuck in your ear.

  58. comment on sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a youngster like yourself, who has clearly not studied the vietnam war, only illustrates his ignorance by likening the present situation in iraq.
    I oposed the vietnam war, at the time, and still think it was wrong. Mainly because a draft to protect foreign and corporate interets is, to my mind, immoral. A draft to protect US sovereignty is a different thing entirely and for WWII was clearly necessary. Our presence in Iraq protects American interests, NOT foreign. Bush will NOT impose a draft. If the military needs more personel for Iraq he will make volunteering more attractive. As it is, US casualties in Iraq are not much higher, as a percentage of troops deployed, than murder fatalities in many urban settings. Atlanta for example had over 1300 murders last year in a population of just under 500,000. Traffic fatalaties, as a percentage of population in Atlanta EXCEED the combined direct war and traffic casualties as a percentage of deployed troops in Iraq. Sure, you might get your ass killed in Iraq, but you're less likely to die there than in Atlanta!

    Kerry has said he is opposed to a draft as well. But wait, there's more. Kerry has also proposed a mandatroy service requirement for US citizens. Under his proposal every citizen will be required ot either serve in the military or in some other capacity as a volunteer (peace corps, americorps, etc). This is a defacto draft with an out for the childre of those with influence...

  59. Obligitory: Yes but... by n0dalus · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux?

  60. BoneFone anyone? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    I remember drooling over the BoneFone http://pocketcalculatorshow.com/magicalgadget/inde x3.html#bonefone as a teenager (Many Many years ago). They never caught on and I never got to see one save in an ad. :(

    Nothing to see here...Move along...Move along...

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  61. say the name out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    swiMP3.

    swim pee three.

    wimpy.

  62. Deaf people have been using the for years by supertbone · · Score: 0

    Bone conduction is nothing new. Some deaf people use bone conduction hearing aids for years. Some people have such a high level of conductive hearing loss that the only way to transmit sound waves is through bone conduction. This form of hearing aid is not common though.

  63. Engadget by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Engadget had this three days ago.

    --

    Gorkman

  64. How soon will Greenpeace sue to have this banned by mre5565 · · Score: 1

    Sound waves carrying across the ocean and
    the effect on whales ...

  65. Bone conduction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Bone Conduction can also make you deaf. Try talking to anyone who has worn cans for more than 10 years in talk radio and you'll know that they're hearing is impaired, mostly due to bone conduction, forcing them to compensate by overiding the gain and subsequently damaging thier cochleas.

  66. Very dangerous idea... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to scare anyone here but... hearing while swimming can mean your life! Wearing these could prevent you from hearing the SHARK MUSIC start and getting OUT of the water in time! These should be banned... or at least come with a VERY strong warning on the label.

    Safety first!
    -Don.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  67. This technology was tried back in 1977!!! by jskline · · Score: 1

    Back then, I purchased one item that "draped" around your neck... call the "Bone Fone"!

    Not much anew about nothin' here. Probably also just as dangerous as they declared the Bone-Fone just as damaging to the skeleton.

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
    1. Re:This technology was tried back in 1977!!! by DerProfi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it seems like they (I think it was Damark?) had ads in every single issue of Popular Science and Popular Mechanics in the 70's and 80's and as a kid I always wanted one! You can't help but wonder how many failed gadgets of the 70's would be selling like hotcakes now in the era of QVC and informercials...

      --

      3000+ comments meta-modded. 0 mod points awarded.
      Lesson for other meta-suckers: Don't believe the hype!
    2. Re:This technology was tried back in 1977!!! by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      "You can't help but wonder how many failed gadgets of the 70's would be selling like hotcakes now in the era of QVC and informercials..."

      Have you watched much late-night/early-morning televisions, or the "shopping" channels?

      There is soooooo much crap for sale these days it probably puts the entire output of the 70's to shame! ;)

  68. Swimps and Slimps...oh my! by wramsdel · · Score: 0

    Okay, so maybe it's just that I lived with graphic designers in college, but I'm sick of companies that try to make up cutesy names ending in MP3. First the SliMP3, now the SwiMP3. I think any competent marketing person would throw out these names at first blush because, frankly, the branding is horrible. What's a slimp? What's a swimp? Yes, the meaning is intellectually obvious, but advertising is more about subconscious perception than intellectualism. To put it in geek terms, the brain will parse the text first, try to process it, then move on to the number. I guess that's why I'm an engineer and not a marketing droid...didn't want to deal with that crap. You better believe, though, that if I wanted to sell something I'd run it by an advertising gal/guy first.

  69. Swimman waterproof player by kfstark · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the non-audiofile swimmer perspective, I just want something to listen to and don't care about the difference in sound quality as long as it sound decent.


    I just received my waterproof MP3 player from swimman and it is a nice little unit that can clip to your goggle strap. I haven't had a chance to try it in the pool because of the rain, but I am looking forward to it.


    My only complaint is that I would like to listen to audiobooks from iTunes, but they are in the wrong format for the device and hymn doesn't handle large audiobook files well.


    --Keith

  70. You know what else this is good for? by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 1

    Great now I can share my Mp3s with all sorts of basal tetrapods, look out horned lizards you're going to hear Britney like you never did before.

  71. spec ops by swordsaintzero · · Score: 1

    I remember a few years ago coming across a site that mentioned using this technology combined with throat mics to permit totally inaudible verbal communication amongst members of tactical teams. (seals special forces that sort of thing) Though I can't seem to find a link at the moment. So this is really nothing new.

    --
    Panel F, Relay #70
  72. Re:gmail invites by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Informative

    fyi - these are not gmail invites. Do not view them.

  73. Oh, by 2names · · Score: 1
    about the same effect on quality when my boss kicks that extra layer of fat on my ass.

    :)

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  74. Damn I left the big smiley off the end of my post by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1

    (but it was considered a joke... don't take it too personally.) 8-)

  75. What boat [FWACK!!] by apenzott · · Score: 1

    If this does work at any reasonable depth, I just hope that the user can still hear ambient noise like a boat or jetski nearby and be able to choose a safe ascent. (Sailboats are a different story.) If not I see a product liability suit with these earphones.

    Also, no mention on if it interferes with equalization.

    --
    The Roman Rule: The one who says it cannot be done shall not interrupt the one who is doing it.
    1. Re:What boat [FWACK!!] by se2schul · · Score: 1

      If you hear a boat or jetski while trying to make an ascent, you can't possibly choose a safe spot, since it is impossible to tell what direction the noise is coming from.

    2. Re:What boat [FWACK!!] by apenzott · · Score: 1

      >If you hear a boat or jetski while trying to make
      >an ascent, you can't possibly choose a safe
      >spot, since it is impossible to tell what direction
      >the noise is coming from.

      At least you can slow/stop/reverse your ascent to look around, determine the nature of the approaching danger, and continue/resume your ascent when the danger has abated (boat or jetski has left.)

      --
      The Roman Rule: The one who says it cannot be done shall not interrupt the one who is doing it.
  76. great... by drkoemans · · Score: 1

    now i can drown to a soundtrack.

  77. Politics as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm John Kerry, and I approve this message.

  78. Ugly bag of mostly water by talaphid · · Score: 1

    Oblig Star Trek quote.. of course not, as it is only yet another ugly bag of mostly water.

  79. Jabra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't the original Jabra earpiece/earphone thing a bone conduction device?

  80. but that's not all!!! by uberR0ck · · Score: 1

    Does it come with the hat?

    How long will it be until we see this walking around town? Would be uncomfortable without the shower cap thing.

  81. Resonant frequency of bone? by Stu_hacking · · Score: 1

    heh - I doubt it's likely, but what if the resonant frequency of bone was within the range of human hearing...it would manage to escape the MP3 compression :P then again what if you got a virus that allows the frequency to not be filtered out and while you were happily swimming and listening, your skeleton suddenly shatters :D

  82. Re: Headroom Amp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, but with the $200-500 it costs to make headphones sound good, you could get a set of nice speakers.
    verdict: highly impractical.

  83. Sorry, but this seems relevant: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  84. ...hey! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    Dammit that was my idea! I thought that it would be really cool to have an MP3 player that had headphones that used the same principle as hearing aids that used bones of your head to conduct sound.

    I wanted to have a Blutooth enabled control pad stuck to your arm somehow. The only thing I could think of to stick the "skullphones" and the control pad to your body was Polygrip denture paste!

  85. Whitewater Kayaking! by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    I have been waiting for one of these to come along. As an avid Whitewater Kayaker, I always wanted a MP3 player that I could listen to when paddling. This seems like just the solution, however, I could not see from the picture how the earpieces were attached ... It seemed like the band of the swimgoogles was holding them on? Not certain there...

    For those out there who are paddlers like myself, I would only use it at places like surfing long beach Vancouver Island. Using it during a class IV+ run or something would be irresponsible IMO.

    Anyone have any ideas of how to secure the headphones when you are dressed like this? and yes, I really do have Tux on my whitewater helmet... While kayaking in Washington state I got some really nasty comments from some people who lived around the Redmond area... Seems they did not like me "taking jobs" away from their area...

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  86. Crash Test Dummies by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what that Crash Test Dummies song Mmmm Mmmm Mmmm Mmmm sounds like? Would your head simply shatter and explode?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  87. Vestigial organs. by rrao · · Score: 1

    Time to update the list of vestigial organs in the human body...

  88. Head Gear That's Hardly There by allwaysmusic · · Score: 1

    I really like how it holds 30 songs and fits all on your head, so there is no chance of it getting in your way and causing you to miss the wave... SwiMP3 - as if it's not even there...

  89. Close, but no cigar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im going to hold out on buying one until they release the full body subwoofer addon.

  90. iPod by TristanDunn · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the iPod will have this soon so people will never have to take them off when showering, swimming, etc.

  91. My Codec Frequency Is... by Black+Mage+Balthazar · · Score: 1

    Snake, you can reach me at 149.86

  92. Does the music sound the same? by tanjung · · Score: 1

    As this is done through bone conduction as opposed to traditional conduction, I wonder if they need to change the strengths of the different frequencies being pumped out by speakers? Does anyone know whether or not there could be a set of resonant frequencies with respect to the cheek bone?