Slashdot Mirror


Video iPod Available... Sort of

Pirogoeth writes "The fine folks over at Engadget have figured out how to get your new iPod Photo to play movies. According to the article, you use Quicktime Pro to export the movie as thousands of individual frames which you export to the iPod, send the soundtrack to the iPod as well, then, if you haven't guessed by now, while playing the soundtrack, put the iPod into slideshow mode and use the scroll wheel to manually keep the frames in synch with the sound. Sound impossible? Here's a video (in mov or wmv) of the Episode III trailer in action..."

297 comments

  1. Is Slashdot crawling Engadget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Because it seems like all of their articles end up here.

    1. Re:Is Slashdot crawling Engadget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google should buy Slashdot guys out.. "Slashdot News"

      They're both just aggregators anyway, it's rare news items on /. are "new"

    2. Re:Is Slashdot crawling Engadget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It plays videos alright, but what the article doesn't mention is that it only works with starwars and gay porn. (I obviously checked, owning an Ipod and all.)

  2. Their Other Idea by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the Engadget Podcast the other day they discussed the idea of having Picture Podcasts. Where at certain points during a podcast they could have a way to display a picture on "picture" supported audio players (ipod, iriver, etc). I thought it was an very very cool idea, I don't have a photo ipod or any of the others, but it would be a neat feature if i had one.

  3. Or... by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or you could just buy somthing that can play both video and audio. Like a PDA or one of the many portable media centers on the market. This is like saying that your printer can play movies if you print out each frame and then flip through them.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Or... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      If my Dell Axim had 40GB storage, that's be a great solution... as it is, I can stream video down to my PDA from my wireless connection. Not a bad solution if you've got the infrastructure. If you're trying to watch a video on the subway, you're kind of SOL.

    2. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


      If you're trying to watch a video on the subway, you're kind of SOL.


      You go around flashing expensive toys on the subway you might find yourself SOL anyway.

    3. Re:Or... by Kenja · · Score: 2
      "If you're trying to watch a video on the subway, you're kind of SOL."

      Other then the problem of telling everyone on the subway that you have too much free money, I dont find this to be a problem. You can fit a LOT of video in 512MB-4GB of storage (which can be gotten for cheap these days).

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Or... by unixbob · · Score: 1

      you don't need 40G of storage though. Re-encode the movie to a bit-rate that's more acceptable for the PDA format and you can get a 700M divx down to ~ 150 / 160M. 1G of SD or CF is cheap as chips these days.

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
    5. Re:Or... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Axim has a CF slot (which I'm using for wireless right now) and a SD.

      1 GB of either of these formats will run you about $100. Compared to a 40GB drive at the iPod price, that's terrible.

      Of course, 1 GB of video is probably plenty when the screen is 320 x 240. The one I got came with something like 32 MB.

    6. Re:Or... by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "1 GB of either of these formats will run you about $100."

      No it will run you about 60$.

      "Compared to a 40GB drive at the iPod price, that's terrible."

      Yea, but see your Axim can play video while your iPod cant (despite what this FA claims). An iPod is also cheaper then a new car, but it works better for some things.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    7. Re:Or... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I got my number from the first thing I could find in Pricewatch (which has a terrible new design).

      I'll have to look around for a nice cheap storage card (at $60, that's not bad).

    8. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 gig of video at 320x240 is not much. VCDs are usually 2 CDs and around 1-1.2 gigs...

    9. Re:Or... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I bought a 5GB Kingston Datapak (PCMCIA hard drive) off of ebay for $100...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    10. Re:Or... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      It is funny, but I have news for you. unless you are deep in one of the outer boroughs late at night the subway is pretty safe. I see people with laptops, portable dvd players, and all kinds of PDA's, mp3 players, portable cd players, etc everyday, not afraid at all. There are tons of undercovers and uniformed cops that ride the rails, and even 90 lb girls are sporting their iPods without fear.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    11. Re:Or... by rgigger · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person who noticed the foot next to this article. I don't think anyone actually intends to use this as a way to watch movies on the iPod.

      What exactly is the point of all of the "why would you ever want to do that" or "just buy an xxx because it already does it posts." We already know this. It's a joke. Laugh.

    12. Re:Or... by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      You go around flashing expensive toys on the subway you might find yourself SOL anyway.

      Sounds like someone from the 'burbs. Time to get over your fears and come live in the real world.

  4. Ugh... by Chagatai · · Score: 5, Funny
    That is one ugly, ugly brute force hack, if I have ever seen one. It's so ugly it hurt my feelings.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so ugly a dog ate it, barfed it up and ate it again.

    2. Re:Ugh... by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look at the bright side. Now instead of looking fashonable with their white earphones, we'll get to see ipod-people looking ridiculous as they scroll furiously to keep their video in sync with the sound while walking down the street.

      It'll be beautiful, I tell you, especially if they walk into a lamp post while doing it.

    3. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proves that Apple is either stupid or playing a very unspeakable game.

      The truth is that their device can do much more (a lot more) than just show pictures and play MP3s. Doesn't Apple realize that? And if they do: why not implement movie playback in the first place?

      Whenever I see a company neutering their own product, I feel I should stop buying from them.

    4. Re:Ugh... by Orgazmus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if they do: why not implement movie playback in the first place?

      Because iPod Video will be avaiable in a couple a months with a $200 addon in price :)

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    5. Re:Ugh... by azav · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's news to me.

      When did you start having feelings?

      : D

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    6. Re:Ugh... by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      One of the nice things about the iPod is it's integration with iTunes. If apple can convince movie studios to let them sell movies through a similar service then we'll probably see a video-capable iPod. Until then, there's not a huge market of people who understand how to rip a DVD and convert it to a format that will fit on the Photo iPod's screen. If there's not a market, there aren't profits to be made. If there aren't profits to be made, Apple has no incentive to release the product.

      If they release it now, /. geeks are about the only people that you'd see carrying around their Futurama libraries; the average Joe won't know how to do this.

      Apple realizes all of the potential of their device and more; just give them time.

    7. Re:Ugh... by Code-Ex · · Score: 1
      Second that...

      I'm all for hacks, but this one reminds me of a flip-it book and a casette player. =)

    8. Re:Ugh... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 0

      It'll be beautiful, I tell you, especially if they walk into a lamp post while doing it.

      Especially when they smash their expensive toy into smithereens... even their fanboism won't save them!

    9. Re:Ugh... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      $200 MORE!?!? and that price you could buy a laptop and/or skip paying the extra $200 and get one of the multitude of other devices that have the exact same capabilities already.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    10. Re:Ugh... by Rii · · Score: 0

      Combo the iPod with pr0n and make the furious scrolling seem less silly!

    11. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's so ugly a dog ate it, barfed it up and ate it again.

      If he was willing to eat it again it couldn't have been all that ugly.

    12. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the bright side. Now instead of looking fashonable with their white earphones, we'll get to see ipod-people looking ridiculous as they scroll furiously to keep their video in sync with the sound while walking down the street.

      Possibly even videos of N'Sync.

      It'll be beautiful, I tell you, especially if they walk into a lamp post while doing it.

      I think one might walk into lamp posts anyway if one watches video while walking down the street...

    13. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont you just love apple?

    14. Re:Ugh... by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      for pr0n you don't need as many images! You can just have an image of a guy thrusting into a girl once, then scroll back and forth and back and forth.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

  5. Posting a .mov on ./ front page??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This has got to be a bandwidth test.

  6. Wow, like those old cameras you have to crank... by infiniter · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't Apple just send out an update to do same? Seems obvious to me.

  7. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did we just slashdot his iPod?

  8. In other news... by Dominatus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists built a car today that doesn't require any fuel at all!!

    All you do is put the car in neutral, grab a buddy and stand behind the car. Then, placing your hands on the rear bumper...push. Scientists believe it's such a simple process we may all be getting around in these miracle cars any day now!

    1. Re:In other news... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Funny
      Four hits of acid and stare really hard.

      Isn't that how BSD was coded?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:In other news... by rrkap · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scientists built a car today that doesn't require any fuel at all!!

      All you do is put the car in neutral, grab a buddy and stand behind the car. Then, placing your hands on the rear bumper...push. Scientists believe it's such a simple process we may all be getting around in these miracle cars any day now!/

      There is, however, considerable debate among scientists weather this cooperative mode of operation is superior to the single operator mode in which the user places his feet through a hole in the floor and runs really fast that has been proposed by F. Flintstone and B. Rubble

      No, I can't spell

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you had an easy flintstones reference and you missed it....

      these new ultra light cars don't use gas, the work by burning sugars in your body.
      to use: sit in the seat, and then make a walking/running motion to move the car forward through the patented 'human powered car through floorboard' technology.

    4. Re:In other news... by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1
      Additional benefits of this revolutionary approach to personal transportation include:

      Cleaner air, due to the vast reduction in fossil fuel use presented by these new vehicles.

      Unlike conventional automobiles, these actually increase the fitness level of the operator.

      Also unlike conventional autos, these cars foster the growth of community, as achieving reasonable velocities involves having several helpers to power the vehicle.

      There's no downside, really. Except for the hills...

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    5. Re:In other news... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of KPT.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    6. Re:In other news... by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't laugh. I have one of those new advanced cars!

    7. Re:In other news... by Elminst · · Score: 5, Funny

      No.. the downside of the hill is easy. It's the upside that kills you.

      badum ching. ;)

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    8. Re:In other news... by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      The Italians developed a car like this back in the 60's. It's called the Ronzoni Downhill.

      thank you! try the shrimp!

    9. Re:In other news... by calculadoru · · Score: 1

      Man, that is plain silly - after four hits of acid you don't need an iPod to see holographic stuff with surround sound, all you have to do is look around you.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    10. Re:In other news... by iamacat · · Score: 1

      I drove to school 5 miles in snow every day! Uphill! Both ways! You insensitive clod!

  9. Great Idea! by maeka · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not having enough cash for an Ipod - I'm going to use this idea with my 35mm slide projector.

    1. Re:Great Idea! by jessecurry · · Score: 1

      with the speed of your slide projector you can easily play anime :)

      --
      Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    2. Re:Great Idea! by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Why don't you take an image of a movie every ho I don't know 30'th of a second, convert them to slides, and proceed to spin them in the carousel. It might be even easier if you tied the slides end to end and just ran them really quickly in front of the lens.

      You'll find it easier if you take the little borders off the slides and scotch tape them all together. Maybe put them on big round things to take up all the extra slack!

      Then you can play the soundtrack while you run the multiple frames really fast in front of the light. And maybe write a short blurb about it and get a story on slashdot, as well as a huge bandwidth bill.

    3. Re:Great Idea! by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you US$10 cash money that you can get that patented if you're thorough and lawyerly about it.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    4. Re:Great Idea! by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      No no, then you scan each slide and write a program to change the image on the screen every 1/30th of a second and you display the digital with a light projection device! Think of the motion!

      Jeremy

  10. Time to upgrade? by fembots · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are all these "innovations" a sign that iPod is in need of a breakthrough? There are more portable players out there with more functions, and I wonder how long will Apple fans stick to it?

    For example, the new Creative's Zen Micro has FM, is someone going to pre-record some radio talk shows and put it into iPod pretending that it's doing radio too?

    1. Re:Time to upgrade? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      No, they'll use the microphone attachment and act like *they're* the radio station.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Time to upgrade? by beef+curtains · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe Griffin will release a new accessory, called the 'Mr iMicrophone': "Hey good looking... We'll be back to pick you up later!"

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    3. Re:Time to upgrade? by baudilus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You can't be serious. I have an iPod, and yes, while FM is a great option - I use the iPod in my car. That's neither here nor there, since there are people that walk around outside with their music players as well... but that thing is even uglier than this iPod "video" hack. It's obviously an iPod look-alike - the blue backlight, the shape, the "touch" pad, the wired remote. Even in the description!
      There's no need to go round in circles with the ZEN MICRO's intuitive Vertical Touch Pad.

      An obvious swipe at the iPod's scroll wheel. Honestly, I have had several mp3 players in the past, and the iPod exceeds them. I have yet to see an interface as innovative, intuitive, and simple as the iPod's scroll wheel (I prefer the 3g to the 4g wheel with buttons). Besides the fact that headphones are awesome as far as earbuds go.

      Besides, it's only 5GB, and is only marginally smaller than the 40GB iPod.

      Cheaper != Better Don't hate the player, hate the game.
    4. Re:Time to upgrade? by MrBlackBand · · Score: 1
      For example, the new Creative's Zen Micro has FM...

      Well since I bought an iPod in order to drown out the annoying comercial radio that they play at work, for me FM is a bug, not a feature.

      There are more portable players out there with more functions...

      The only function I really care about is the ability to play music. Everything else is just bloat.

      --
      "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
    5. Re:Time to upgrade? by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      ...is someone going to pre-record some radio talk shows and put it into iPod pretending that it's doing radio too?

      I thought that was the point of the Radio Shark.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    6. Re:Time to upgrade? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      My god what a ripoff. That thing is an ipod mini with the buttons moved around, 1 more GB of space and released by a demonic company.

      I just got a 4th gen (click wheel) ipod and its fantastic. There are minor innovations since at least the 2nd gen. Supposedly the 4th gen is all new stuff inside and out, but I haven't noticed much difference aside from the customizable menus and new games.

      Things that are new to me:
      Games:
      Parachute (aim a turret with the wheel, shoot parachuting men and hellicopters)
      Solitare (my favorite time killing game when I'm on a calculator or other tiny device)
      And best of all:
      Music Quiz (It plays about 5 seconds of a song that is on your ipod and you try and pick which one it is from a list of 5 songs on displayed on screen. Your possible points counts down as well as the # of choices. The perfect game for a portable mp3 player, now if only it saved high scores & or let you "win" after so many songs or something)

      I'm not an Apple fan, my iPod is the only Apple product I own & use. I don't even use iTunes, I use EphPod. But the iPod is tiny, holds 20GB, has a sleek interface, both physically and the menus, it can charge from the same cable you use to transfer music & data to it with. It's just an all around solid product. While I wish the iPod supported Ogg, and FM radio, its other features outshine the other mp3 players I looked at. Besides, creative's software is a legend among poor quality and bloatware. That and I don't have any USB 2.0 ports on my computer, but I do have IEEE 1394 (aka Firewire). Now I just wish the prices for cases/accessories for the ipod would come down out of the stratosphere.

      P.S. I don't wear the idiotic looking, painful, white headphones that come with it. I'm in love with my Sony MDR-A44s.

      --

      Question everything

    7. Re:Time to upgrade? by DMJC-L · · Score: 0

      FM radio? iriver has had fm radio for ages. Color screen? get an ihp-320/340 the open source firmware recently got the lcd screen workign.. there was talk of making movies work on the color versions..

    8. Re:Time to upgrade? by jseale · · Score: 1
      Maybe, assuming that there actually are some FM radio stations in the US broadcasting some decent talk shows. LOL

      If you're going to do that kinda' thing, get a RadioShark. It's like a Tivo for your radio and wll record both FM and AM broadcasts.

    9. Re:Time to upgrade? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      is someone going to pre-record some radio talk shows and put it into iPod pretending that it's doing radio too?

      Uhm... Actually I already do that every day (face turns red)

    10. Re:Time to upgrade? by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      You know, FM radio is not something you're being forced to listen to. Some people like the unpredictable playlist, or the news stations. You may simply ignore it. On most walkmen, inclusion of radio did not increase the size or complexity of the device. I can't imagine it would take a lot to include AM/FM in the iPod.

      Thats the feature that stops me from buying one as I listen to Howard Stern, NPR, and some of the AM talk shows like Curtis And Kuby in NYC. The iPod is afterall a music player first and foremost. And what does Apple do: put in photo capability? Something that most cameras can alrady do very well, including TV output. It's ponderous to me.

  11. Well.. by $0+31337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sound impossible?

    No, Just stupid.

    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It highly depends. Can you hold the Ipod with one hand and scroll the wheel well? For, uhh.. never mind.

    2. Re:Well.. by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am glad that we do not let what's useful determine what we actually try to accomplish. Perhaps if we could harness all the wasted energy that goes into stuff like this we could solve that power production problem recently discussed here.

    3. Re:Well.. by mu_shadow · · Score: 0

      That would be like patting your head and rubbing your belly at the same time. Impossible? No, it would just take pratice...lots and lots and lots and ...

      --
      Thanks, because I don't know what I'm talking about and never claimed I did...
    4. Re:Well.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Is this even real? I've just watched the video and the movie playback speed looks very constant. The person's finger movement ... doesn't. The iPod is also held very still and so it would have been very easy for them to have added the video clip on afterwards.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Well.. by schtum · · Score: 1

      Did we watch the same video? The one i saw slowed and sped up with the finger, and Obi Wan's voice never matched his lips. Still, I was impressed at how smooth it was. I wouldn't have thought an iPod could load so many photos in rapid succession without any (non-finger related)slowdown.

  12. That's pretty retarded right there by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Informative


    Geesh. Why not just print all the frames out onto paper and make a flipbook?

    If you want a video player in an iPod's form factor, either sit tight for 2 years until a honest-to-goodness Video iPod to come out, or buy a Gmini 200 (Flash page).

    I chose the latter and haven't looked back.

    1. Re:That's pretty retarded right there by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      ...or until they port mplayer to the iPod.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    2. Re:That's pretty retarded right there by HellSpam · · Score: 1

      It's a gmini 400... and I have to agree. It's great.

  13. TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by Erect+Horsecock · · Score: 1

    Why does apple even put it on there anymore?

    its annoying as fuck, and as soon as i got my 3G pod it was muted.

    --
    I hope you die painfully and alone.
    1. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the pictures on your site are so horrible.

      Nasty fuck.

    2. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by ortcutt · · Score: 1

      I like the clicker.

    3. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I like the clicker.

      I do too. It gives a little aural feedback on how fast you are scrolling. It's not necessary by any means but neither is solitaire.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    4. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect from someone who has the handle Erect Horsecock?

    5. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by sarahemm · · Score: 1

      I'd like the clicker if I could set it to 'Through Headphones' instead of through the speaker in the unit itself. With noise canceling/blocking headphones on (which I always have on), the clicker is fairly useless as-is.

    6. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by astro-g · · Score: 1

      the option for click through the headphones is there on my 4th gen 20gig. bit loud though, and it feels like its sounding inside your skull, rather than from the touchpad.

    7. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by sarahemm · · Score: 1

      Finally! :) I'm still using my 1G 5GB model, but i'm thinking of replacing it soon. Loud is good when you have hearing loss ;o)

    8. Re:TURN OFF THE CLICKER!!! by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Loud is good when you have hearing loss

      Actually, Steve's hearing is not great, so iPod is louder than most MP3 players. A good thing too, otherwise I wouldn't be able to listen to audiobooks while jogging in somewhat noisy outdoors.

  14. Video in Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's a video (in mov or wmv) of the Episode III trailer in action...

    ...which can be played on an iPod, which someone can make a movie of... which can be played on another iPod, which...

    1. Re:Video in Action by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a video of an iRiver playing a movie of an iPod photo trying to play a movie

      Since engadget is slow now (wonder why!), here's the text from the above link:

      We're the first to admit playing a "movie" on an iPod Photo by exporting the sound, and thousands of frames is as silly as it sounds, so ludicrous that we had to do a how-to on it. Now things are getting toally wacky, and already a video has turned up of someone watching a video on their iRiver H320 (an MP3 player which just recently acquired the ability to playback video clips) of us "watching" the new Star Wars trailer on our iPod Photo. It's getting mighty recursive in here.

      Read

  15. I used to have a paperback book that could... by SkyMunky · · Score: 5, Funny

    play movies too.
    I had to flip the pages and hum the soundtrack, but the hand-drawn stick figure animations were outstanding.

  16. Re:WTF? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Seriously, why is this news?"

    Can't you read? It says iPod right there in the subject line.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  17. Is this another plug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for Engadget, compliments of ptorrone?

    1. Re:Is this another plug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it is one of his sockpupet handles, it probably is one of his lackeys.

  18. I like my current player by Locdonan · · Score: 0

    My Etch-a-sketch plays doom3 the same way. And I ALWAYS win.

    --
    If I wrote something witty, you would say I stole it from somewhere.
  19. In other news... by dr00g911 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've determined a hack to make my original 20 gig iPod play holographic content in surround sound with no additional hardware needed!

    Four hits of acid and stare really hard. Much more elegant (by orders of magnitude) and less of a brute force approach than TFA.

  20. Why no videa on the new iPod? by 3770 · · Score: 5, Insightful


    What is more likely?

    1) The new color iPod does not have video because the hardware can't support it.
    2) Apple does not have a way to sell movies and videos on iTunes.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    1. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't sell photographs either.

      They do offer downloads of trailers from the quicktime site, why not through that on your pod to show yer friends?

      My hunch is 1 - 3 years video ipod with wifi,
      we all know its coming.

    2. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      I expect a itunes movie store to come out the same day the rom update with the video player ocmes out. The fact that it has av out makes this one killer app. Consider carryign around your movie collection or TV show collection like we carry around mp3s now. Either watch it on a tiny screen or plug it into somethign with AV in. Oh and expect to be able to get your favorite tV shows off a store. :)

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    3. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Close to the second - not only is there no store, but there's no way to legally get content (for the most part), period. I suspect that an iMac with a TV tuner, the iTunes (or quicktime) movie store, the video iPod, and Airport Express for video will all hit at around the same time. What a glorious day/month/year that will be...

    4. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the lack of wireless is lame, right?

    5. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) Watching video is intrinsically a more involved process than listing to music and therefore much less suited to a portable device.

    6. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1

      with pixar under apples belt, and pixar looking for a new publisher, one of the bargning terms could be a joint effort with their new publisher in an online movie rental service.

    7. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by Apotsy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget using LCD goggles and headphones to watch video. It would be a personal mini-theater. Great for working out on a treadmill or long plane trips.

    8. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by ortcutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      The chip which the iPod photo (and the 4G iPod) uses, the PP5020 (aka personal media player: photo edition) can play MJPEG video. MJPEG is basically a series of JPEG images though, so it's not far off what these clever folks have done. MJPEG playback could certainly be added in a firmware upgrade. Apple is probably waiting for new versions of the PortalPlayer chip that have real compressed video support before it sells an iPod billed as a video player. http://www.portalplayer.com/products/platforms_med iaplayer.html

    9. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1



      1) The new color iPod does not have video because the hardware can't support it.

      The posted story seems to show otherwise.

      2) Apple does not have a way to sell movies and videos on iTunes.

      Uh, weren't there a couple generations if iPods before iTMS was rolled out? I understand iTunes was released with the first iPods (I think), but the music store itself came a couple years later.

    10. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by kaitou · · Score: 0

      or for walking down the street ;)

    11. Re:Why no videa on the new iPod? by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      1) Clearly the iPod Photo does have hardware that's capable of supporting video - it seems to me that playing a movie as a slideshow is proof of that.

      2) The iTunes Music Store already contains videos, although they are admitedly not for sale. However if Apple can sell audio through their store I don't see much of a reason why they couldn't sell video, beyond having contracts in place with suppliers.

      So why wasn't the iPod Photo an iPod Video? For the reasons that Apple has stated - they don't think that the public really wants that at this time.

      There's a few other factors I can think of. Firstly the iPod screen is tiny - it's not what I would choose to watch a video on. Secondly I would expect that video would place higher demands on battery life. Thirdly the iPod is a portable device designed primarily for use whilst you're walking around - watching video doesn't really fit into that.

      I expect Apple probably will sell a video iPod some time next year complete with a larger screen. For launch they'll also line up content for sale (or maybe also free download) suitable for use on the device, such as music videos, short films, and cartoons.

  21. Or... by DaveCBio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could just buy a portable video player that does everything the iPod does and more for about the same price.

  22. slashdotted by fembots · · Score: 1

    Another victim not reading the Do-Not-Slashdot ACT 1996

    Coral link here.

    1. Re:slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your coral-fu is weak. It does not work.

    2. Re:slashdotted by rolocroz · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck is going to do that?

      --

      I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

  23. Apple losing direction by xThinkx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mod me as a troll of you wish, but I'm not trolling.

    I think the fact that so soon after the new ipod comes out people are brute forcing it to play movies is a demonstration that Apple may be losing its direction in innovation

    I'm an avid digital photographer, and in almost all of the photo boards I hang out on, the opinion of the photo ipod was generally disappointing. How hard would it have been to put a freakin CF card reader in it? How hard would it have been to enable movie playback in at least ONE format?

    The ipod was helped in its jump to the top by the fact that it was innovative, so much so that people were willing to ignore its high price tag. Apple missed two big opportunities on this one; movie playback AND easy storage transfer from camera media.

    I'm not buying a photo ipod now, but I would've in a second if it had those two features. Apple, I hope this is an isolated incident.
    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
    1. Re:Apple losing direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have never just added more stuff because it was easy to add more stuff. If they feel it complicates things, they leave it off. The bigger question is how do you design use of the features you want into an easy intuitive interface? That design will cost much. Will enough people really want what you want to make it worth that expense?

    2. Re:Apple losing direction by telemonster · · Score: 1

      The ipod was helped in its jump to the top by the fact that it was innovative, so much so that people were willing to ignore its high price tag. Apple missed two big opportunities on this one; movie playback AND easy storage transfer from camera media.

      No, the iPod was helped to jump to the top by marketing. There were other products that were similiar, first. Kind of how Tivo dwarfed ReplayTV, who had a better product (from what I've read). Replay is way more innovative, but Tivo won. The iPod case and controls were styled fairly well but honestly, a handheld Sony recordable minidisc player is ****WAY**** more of a marvel than an ipod. The drive inside the iPod is amazing, not the device itself.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    3. Re:Apple losing direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      The ipod was helped in its jump to the top by the fact that it was innovative

      Err... no. It was (and is) successful because it's easy to use. It does what most people want and not much more.

      I'm an avid digital photographer,

      You are not in the target market for the iPod Photo.

      The iPod Photo is for people that want to show their holiday or family pictures around. Not for photographers as a storage medium.

      No idea if there are enough people in that designated target market. But apparently Apple thought there would be.

      Andreas
    4. Re:Apple losing direction by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The ipod was helped in its jump to the top by the fact that it was innovative

      Nope. The iPod made its way to the top by being *simple*. No useless features. No features that *sort-of* work. No features that make the thing a pain-in-the-butt to deal with. It did 1 thing and did that 1 thing well, simply, and trouble-free. Now it does a couple things well, simply, and trouble-free.

      This isn't because Apple can't figure out how to do these things-- you just won't see it in a commercially available product until Apple feels it has it all worked out into a simple interface. And when I say simple, I mean like the scroll-wheel design for the interface, or the fact that there's only 1 in/out port (the dock connector). Apple likes their designs to be fool-proof.

      PS- You can transfer images from a digital camera, but you need an accessory.

    5. Re:Apple losing direction by thatshortkid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it would be a correct mod, you are trolling.

      look, you want a card reader? fine, there it is. but to make it built in would be ludicrous. if they did put one in, it would probably not be the card of your preference, so adding even more slots would increase the bulk (and price) on the ipod. secondly, it's a (repeat after me) MUSIC PLAYER. yes, it can be used as a portable hard drive, but that's a niche market compared to its overall first use, bringing music to your ears.

      as for movies, nobody wants to walk before they can run around here. if they had added quicktime movie playback, everybody would be up in arms about why battery life sucks more than it already does. it only gets 5 hours of battery life as it is with STILL images! if you want a portable movie player now, these people can help you. although i doubt you'll like what they have, since again the card reader is an attachment and not built-in.

      --
      The IRS is the one organization that you don't want to fuck with. Remember, these are the guys who took down Al Capone.
    6. Re:Apple losing direction by EricHsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not a troll, but I do disagree with you. 1. The iPod didn't sell because of innovative features. It sold because of innovative interface and style (and herd-like fashion momentum). When it came out /. was crapping itself to talk about how stupid the device was because of... low features! Some things never change. 2. Jobs has said many people play music hundreds of times, and only few people play movies repeatedly. The fact that one guy did a 'cause it was there' kind of movie hack on the iPod does not make a market. Maybe as digital video gets easier (got to love those flash-card mini-camcorders, too bad about the shooting quality), the market will grow. 3. It costs money to squeeze features on. It's already expensive as it is. 4. If Apple 'missed' the opportunities, then who is taking advantage of it? Is anyone making money off of a portable mini movie player? I'm not convinced a market exists. My own consumer opinion is I'm not going to get a photo iPod, but I can see the market, especially for the output-to-TV features.

    7. Re:Apple losing direction by giminy · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but for a totally different reason. Yes, I hate when spiels start that way, too.

      When Apple made the iPod, it was genius. This is especially true with what's it done with the later generations. The iPod is this incredibly simple and useful tool, and nothing has really changed. This is great. Apple made the iPod not about the iPod, but about the music. My roommates have a 2G and a 3G ipod, and I have a 4G. There's no jealousy over whose is better, because they are exactly the same thing (well, the 3G and 4G have bigger disks and a different cable [which I don't take advantage of one mine anyway]). But they still just play music, they all have the same screen. The interface buttons changed a tiny bit, but the argument is out on who likes which layout better.

      By adding whizbang features like CompactFlash would cheapen the iPod and make it about the hardware. Suddenly my friend and I would be comparing each other's iPods as, "oh, yours was made when CF was the standard, you poor fool. Mine is good enough to at least read micro-dvds."

      That said, I'm wondering why Apple made one with a color screen and more features in the first place. It seems like they're straying from the traditional simplistic design by making one iPod superior to another out of the box...

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    8. Re:Apple losing direction by jxyama · · Score: 1

      just because someone kluged some function doesn't mean such function is in demand... in the same vain, would you recommend that microsoft start selling xbox with linux on it?

    9. Re:Apple losing direction by switcha · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How hard would it have been to put a freakin CF card reader in it? How hard would it have been to enable movie playback in at least ONE format?

      I've got a pretty decent camera. It doesn't use CF. How many readers you gonna pack in and keep the form factor desirable?

      As for video, if you've got a battery fashioned out of pixie dust and dreams that can power video for a reasonable amount of time (and keep the form factor down), I'm sure Apple would love to hear from you.

      Everybody wants, wants, wants. "Won't but one until it has _____!". There are other options or devices out there (including waiting for technology to catch up). Criticizing people or companies who owe you nothing is such a habit of this board, that I don't think a lot of people step back to look at how absurd it is when they get bent out of shape because _____ isn't catering to their specific checklist of desires.

      And to your point, if the fact people are doing it means that 'demand' demands it, then Apple must be way behind on adding LEDs and neon ground effects shit to their cases. Or adding wheels to the bottom. Or adding rubber cases to the iPod. Or...

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    10. Re:Apple losing direction by xThinkx · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot, do you know what you're getting into asking that kind of question here?

      --
      Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
      "
    11. Re:Apple losing direction by Holi · · Score: 1

      Umm I don't think replay was much more innovative. Replay had better quality recordings, but Tivo had the interface that could not be beat. In the end ease of use won in the ends.

      It works the same way here, other mp3 players have more features better quality sound and what ever, but Apple has the interface.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    12. Re:Apple losing direction by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      I bought the 60GB version, but the photo thing was sorta a "nice-to-have" for this boy. The really cool things about it were: (A) Upgraded color screen, better fonts for the interface. (B) 60 gigs'o'music. (C) 15 hrs battery life. (D) 60 gigs'o'music.

      I'm not sure about the battery life, but it just died as I was typing this, and my last recharge was Monday evening. S'good enough for me.

      As for the photo functionality, it's cool, but let's face it, these pics are about the size of the one on my driver's license - In other words, they're pretty underwhelming. I didn't buy this thing for that.

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    13. Re:Apple losing direction by ortcutt · · Score: 1

      One word...PortalPlayer. Apple uses the capabilities of the chips that PortalPlayer produces. Of course as PortalPlayer's biggest customer, I'm sure they have a certain amount of clout concerning what sort of features PortalPlayer designs its chips can do. Interestingly, the chip in the iPod Photo can play video in the MJPEG format and that may be activated in a firmware upgrade in the future. On your other point about CF cards, I would be surprised it someone doesn't develop an external CF reader soon if that is technically feasible.

    14. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I've got a pretty decent camera. It doesn't use CF. How many readers you gonna pack in and keep the form factor desirable?

      All formats are smaller than CF, so just make adaptors (like a PCMCIA adaptor that takes MemoryStick or xD, etc).

      As for video, if you've got a battery fashioned out of pixie dust and dreams that can power video for a reasonable amount of time (and keep the form factor down), I'm sure Apple would love to hear from you.

      Battery has nothing to do with it. If the iPod Photo can play photo slideshows and AAC, then it can do video. What I don't understand is why not play those stupid little 15s videos you can take with every digicam?

      Everybody wants, wants, wants. "Won't but one until it has _____!". There are other options or devices out there (including waiting for technology to catch up). Criticizing people or companies who owe you nothing is such a habit of this board, that I don't think a lot of people step back to look at how absurd it is when they get bent out of shape because _____ isn't catering to their specific checklist of desires.

      Far less absurd than the notion that you aren't supposed to criticize a company or product for not meeting your desires or expectations.

      You're right that Apple owes me nothing (actually they do as I've purchased many of their products, but that wasn't your point), but likewise I don't owe them allegience. If I don't like their actions or their products, I will criticize them as I see fit.

      And to your point, if the fact people are doing it means that 'demand' demands it, then Apple must be way behind on adding LEDs and neon ground effects shit to their cases. Or adding wheels to the bottom. Or adding rubber cases to the iPod. Or...

      These are add-ons (and Apple is keeping up with case mods by making stunning cases). You can't "add-on" video playback (not reasonably), and the add-on card reader is extremely lame. You can't compare the criticism.

      Your comparison is faulty. This is especially illuminating due to the fact that no one is making the criticisms you made up. You were able to show them as ridiculous because they are. But that does not make all criticism ridiculous.

    15. Re:Apple losing direction by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Battery has nothing to do with it. If the iPod Photo can play photo slideshows and AAC, then it can do video.

      No. There are these little chips, called coprocessors. It is quite possible that the iPod has a chip designed to do AAC coprocessing. Thus, it may not have the horsepower to playback compressed video. If anyone is storing DV on their iPod Photo and then getting upset they can't watch it on the screen, well, tough luck.

      What I don't understand is why not play those stupid little 15s videos you can take with every digicam?

      Because they are stupid. F'real.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    16. Re:Apple losing direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm an avid digital photographer, and in almost all of the photo boards I hang out on, the opinion of the photo ipod was generally disappointing. How hard would it have been to put a freakin CF card reader in it? How hard would it have been to enable movie playback in at least ONE format?

      iRiver has a player -- slightly predating the iPod Photo -- which can function as a USB host for transferring photos.

      It's also extremely fucking ugly, and I personally wouldn't buy one 'til the platform matures a bit. But just a FYI.

    17. Re:Apple losing direction by switcha · · Score: 1
      You're right that Apple owes me nothing (actually they do as I've purchased many of their products, but that wasn't your point), but likewise I don't owe them allegience.

      No, they don't owe you anything. Get over yourself. You have the free speech to criticize, but getting mad when they (any company) ignore it for real world things like actually technological and market limitations is laughable.

      If I don't like their actions or their products, I will criticize them as I see fit.

      Ah, then you've obviously submitted your opinions to Apple. Or just bought a competitor that already does what you want.Or something...anything more productive than getting mad a company for not making what you, node 3, desire.

      Your comparison is faulty.

      Good job. You spotted the sarcasm.

      Unfortunately, it appears that you insist on thinking markets are driven by wishing and whining. Markets are driven by people who spend money, not the ones who say what it would take to make them buy things.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    18. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1
      No. There are these little chips, called coprocessors. It is quite possible that the iPod has a chip designed to do AAC coprocessing. Thus, it may not have the horsepower to playback compressed video. If anyone is storing DV on their iPod Photo and then getting upset they can't watch it on the screen, well, tough luck.

      Who said DV? Who said some high CPU codec? Battery has *nothing* to do with their decision on playing video. It is probably one of four reasons for not playing DVD quality video (the other three being screen size, not having a video store, and wanting to be able to criticize the players that *do* play video).

      How large is the battery for a Sony DV Camera which runs a tape drive, a write head, an LCD, optics, *and* a DV *encoder* compared to the iPod battery?

      What I don't understand is why not play those stupid little 15s videos you can take with every digicam?

      Because they are stupid. F'real.

      If the "they" you are referring to are the little video clips (and not Apple), I disagree with that as being a valid reason. They are dumpy, but fun. They are also less stupid than the games Apple has added to the iPod.

      Apple is just afraid of putting any video onto the iPod. I can understand their reasoning, but I disagree it very much--it helps Apple by actively *not* helping me (the consumer).
    19. Re:Apple losing direction by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it appears that you insist on thinking markets are driven by wishing and whining. Markets are driven by people who spend money, not the ones who say what it would take to make them buy things.

      BS alert... the airlines lower prices because people don't spend. Car dealers lower prices when people don't spend. Hookers lower prices when people bitch and moan and keep their money in their pocket - go back to school....

    20. Re:Apple losing direction by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      ow hard would it have been to put a freakin CF card reader in it?

      well, for those of use whose cameras don't use CF, we'd bitch "why didn't they put a SD/SM/XD/MemoryStick(TM)/card-of-choice reader in it?!" the problem is too many format choices.

      I think that the day that apple has video on the iPod is the day that iMovie (or iDVD) will re-encode the video in real time (relative to the copying of data to the vPod). Perhaps with a dual 2.5ghz G5, it would be possible to down-sample a movie to the 'pod with no noticeable delay, but that's not for everyone, and Apple's all about "technology that's elegant and everyone [who has bought a computer in the last 2 years] can use.

      Although, I would be happy if the Photo iPod could at least play back movie trailers, after all, they're available for viewing on the iTMS, why not make the downloadable to the 'pod?

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    21. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1
      No, they don't owe you anything. Get over yourself. You have the free speech to criticize, but getting mad when they (any company) ignore it for real world things like actually technological and market limitations is laughable.

      So I should be happy? Or be entirely dispassionate? I absolutely *HATE* the Windows taskbar/startmenu abomination. I openly share my opinions when appropirate (and probably often when not), and if MS ever asked, I'd let them know as well. You're acting as if I'm wrong to do so?

      Ah, then you've obviously submitted your opinions to Apple. Or just bought a competitor that already does what you want.Or something...anything more productive than getting mad a company for not making what you, node 3, desire.

      As we've already covered, I don't owe Apple my input. Sometimes I do let them know my opinion by sending feedback. It's entirely my choice when to do so, not yours. Video support is not something that makes a difference to me on the iPod, but my opinion still stands--I'd rather it have it than it not. Apple can seek out my wisdom here on Slashdot or not, I really don't care.

      If this was an important issue, then your criticism would make more sense (that I shouldn't just piss and moan about it, but do something to change it). Do you follow your own advice? Or like most moralists, do you just like to blow hot air? For example, do you complain to a department store about their choice in ambient music, or do you just (like me) vent your frustration with the person you're with (ie: "god damn I hate N*Sync, it's even worse as muzak!")?

      Your comparison is faulty.

      Good job. You spotted the sarcasm.

      Sarcasm is irony meant to insult. If it was sarcasm, then you meant the opposite, so you were insulting me by pretending to disagree? It doesn't quite follow.

      Unfortunately, it appears that you insist on thinking markets are driven by wishing and whining. Markets are driven by people who spend money, not the ones who say what it would take to make them buy things.

      When did I *ever* state anything about how markets work? Aside from your lack of understanding if you believe your two sentences sum up how markets work, you are making the implicit assumption that my post on Slashdot is meant to change the iPod market or some such.

      Let me help clear it up for you: I'm saying that the iPod Photo *can* support video and that it should, but for Apple's (SJ's) aversion to adding video to the iPod, and that I wish they weren't so pig-headed. Oh well, c'est la vie.

      And just to save time, if you plan to take the opinion that if it's not a big deal to me, then why should Apple care? 1. I never said they should care about my opinion, but 2. I'm still less likely to buy an iPod, however so slightly, because of this, and on the grander scheme, I'm more likely to be critical of Apple in the long run. This is similar to people not liking MS's tactics in the market. They certainly will get away with (for example) stealing code from some competitor in the short run, but it will put them forever under more scrutiny even when they *aren't* raping and pillaging the marketplace.
    22. Re:Apple losing direction by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Who said DV? Who said some high CPU codec? Battery has *nothing* to do with their decision on playing video. It is probably one of four reasons for not playing DVD quality video (the other three being screen size, not having a video store, and wanting to be able to criticize the players that *do* play video).

      How large is the battery for a Sony DV Camera which runs a tape drive, a write head, an LCD, optics, *and* a DV *encoder* compared to the iPod battery?


      The reason I suggested DV is because it is relatively light in terms of compute-intensiveness; it takes up a lot of space as a trade. Since the iPod has plenty of space but not much compute, DV would be ideal.

      Digression - you CANNOT directly relate compute-intensity on a CPU to power consumption of a codec ASIC. It doesn't work like that - some very compute-intensive algorithms work extremely efficiently in ASIC form, while others don't (a lot of this is parallelization - ASICs tend to do better on parallelizable algorithms, or on algorithms that require a lot of hardwired bitshifting, while serial algorithms tend to run as well on high-speed general purpose CPUs). As a result, your example (the Sony DV cam) is totally meaningless - the encoder is practically free power-wise (but not cost-wise, which is probably why Apple doesn't put video codec chips onto iPods). As to who said high-CPU codec - well, pretty much everyone. People seem to want to stick MPEG-4s on there. MPEG-4 is not a particularly efficient codec, compute-wise, and as a result would require a dedicated codec, which would suck juice (I believe it would suck juice, I haven't looked at the math for MPEG-4 enough to know how efficiently it could be placed into logic - I do know it is compute-intensive).

      Next, the smallest available battery pack for a Sony DVcam that I could find is a 680 mAh pack. My iPod's battery is a 850 mAh pack. That 680 mAh pack? It'll run the smallest, most efficient Sony miniDV camera for 2 hours, max, if you're lucky. Most DVcam battery packs (the ones that actually advertise being usable for multiple hours of continuous recording) are in the 2000+ mAh range; Sony even sells a 6800 mAh battery. Conclusion - significantly larger than the iPod's battery.

      If the "they" you are referring to are the little video clips (and not Apple), I disagree with that as being a valid reason. They are dumpy, but fun. They are also less stupid than the games Apple has added to the iPod.

      Apple is just afraid of putting any video onto the iPod. I can understand their reasoning, but I disagree it very much--it helps Apple by actively *not* helping me (the consumer).


      They are dumpy, but I wouldn't call them fun. The games are at least usable to kill time on the bus for me; how many times can you watch a 15 second video of your friend punching himself in the face? It's one thing to have them on a digicam, where its basically a bit of extra software on top of the core function of the device - hey, it takes pictures? Why not make it take a whole bunch of crappy pictures real fast and make a crappy movie out of it? But adding that to the iPod would require adding on to the core function of the device, and I'm afraid I see neither the desire nor the need.

      Sorry, but I have to go with Apple here - there isn't really a good reason to add video to the iPod. The extra cost would drive away more customers than the feature would attract.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    23. Re:Apple losing direction by switcha · · Score: 1
      1. I never said they should care about my opinion

      You're right that Apple owes me nothing (actually they do as I've purchased many of their products...)

      Yes you did.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    24. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Digression - you CANNOT directly relate compute-intensity on a CPU to power consumption of a codec ASIC.

      Who said I was? Fact: The iPod Photo *can* show frames fast enough for video. After that it becomes a moot point. Whatever format the iPod Photo uses for images it can use for video. END OF STORY.

      Digression - Whatever sort of technology the Sony DV cam uses, the iPod Photo can use. The details (which you are arguing over) have already been solved by others. Whether Apple chooses to use them is up to Apple, but your insistance that there are technical hurdles IS FALSE.

      Next, the smallest available battery pack for a Sony DVcam that I could find is a 680 mAh pack. My iPod's battery is a 850 mAh pack. That 680 mAh pack? It'll run the smallest, most efficient Sony miniDV camera for 2 hours, max, if you're lucky.

      2 hours eh? Sounds like plenty of time for showing those dopey videos you get from a digicam.

      Conclusion - significantly larger than the iPod's battery.

      Didn't you just say Sony's smallest battery is a lower capacity than the iPod's battery? Sounds like you are ignoring all but the conclusions which support your stance?

      They are dumpy, but I wouldn't call them fun.

      That's your issue. People have them, people want to use them. The iPod Photo (or iPod AV) would be a good place to show them.

      Why not make it take a whole bunch of crappy pictures real fast and make a crappy movie out of it? But adding that to the iPod would require adding on to the core function of the device, and I'm afraid I see neither the desire nor the need.

      Dude, you are so being purposefully obtuse it's humoruous. "A digicam takes photos, so why not take a bunch real quick, but the iPod Photo is different?" Think about it, an iPod Photo shows photos, so why not show a bunch real fast, eh?

      Sorry, but I have to go with Apple here - there isn't really a good reason to add video to the iPod. The extra cost would drive away more customers than the feature would attract.

      You're just making shit up to either 1) hold onto a point that you were wrong about or 2) to keep from saying something bad about Apple. I don't know, nor care, which it is, you're still wrong. The only point you have is that *you* don't want video support. I'm cool with that, to each his own, just don't pretend like it's some huge technical hurdle that Apple can't surmount--especially when the current iPod Photo can show pictures faster than a standard video file while decoding an AAC.

      Adding video capability to the iPod Photo would be a very simple thing. Just have it play silly little mpeg/avi/mov's that digicams take.

      But no, Steve Jobs says you don't want to watch a whole movie on an iPod, plus there are no movies you can legally put on an iPod, so they won't even let you watch your little digicam flics.

      Think whatever you want. Don't let facts get in the way of your happy delusion.

    25. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1
      1. I never said they should care about my opinion

      You're right that Apple owes me nothing (actually they do as I've purchased many of their products...)

      Yes you did.

      Is English a second language of yours? First lesson in reading comprehension is context. When taken in context, what I've said is clearly not a contradiction.

      But my guess is you are being a little prick who finds it funny to note literal contradictions (even if the meaning isn't contradictory). If you want to play that game, I *literally* never said Apple should care about my opinion. I did say they owe me something due to my purchasing of their products (they owe me warranty type obligations).

      So go crawl back into your little hole and think about what you've done, and keep your pedantic neuroticism to yourself lest you ever say something that is literally false, but which is to any human speaker of the language understandable and rational.
    26. Re:Apple losing direction by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      My technology objections relate to the EXISTING iPods. Yes, Apple can redesign it to add full-on video capabilities. They probably shouldn't; like I said, additional sales from video are unlikely to match the redesign costs, especially when you account for the price differential needed to do video properly.

      the current iPod Photo can show pictures faster than a standard video file while decoding an AAC.

      Where do you see evidence that the iPod Photo can do video frame rates? From the description of video quality, it sounds like its pretty crappy, which would suggest that the Photo is dropping frames when you scroll to catch up, accounting for the fact that it probably isn't designed to do 30 FPS. From looking at the video the Engadget guys did (and this is a bad way to judge, since the frames aren't synchronized) I might buy 15 FPS, but I'd bet that it really only hits 5-10 FPS.

      Sony's smallest pack is only used because it weighs 1.6 oz and it comes with the cameras; the 2 hour estimate there is like Apple's 10+ hour claim (i.e. pretty much a lie.) Also, think about this - Sony's power consumption is largely from the LCD and tape. Playing a video is going to suck power from the iPod far more rapidly (Sony's consumption: 2.6W, for the smallest camera w/ viewfinder and LCD active. iPod's drain, back-estimated, assuming 8 hours run, is 0.3W. Want to know how much power that LCD takes all on its own, on the Sony? About 0.3W.) I know a lot of people who use Sony cams; almost all of them have significantly larger (usually 2000+ mAh) battery packs, because that 680 mAh pack is worthless in practice when you need the camera for more than an hour or so of *standby* time, with infrequent recording. Think of it like the 'starter' ink cartridges that come in a lot of printers - good enough to make it work, but not really enough to work with.

      People have them, people want to use them. The iPod Photo (or iPod AV) would be a good place to show them.

      Who? I've seen ONE person use it, ever. And that was because they were playing around with their new camera. They said "ooh, movies!" and took a stupid movie. And you know what? They never used it again. I don't see a huge demand for it; I don't see people sticking them on their MPEG-4 capable cellphones, even when the cellphone is capable of taking the movie in the first place and there's no hassle dealing with format conversion like there would be getting it onto an iPod Photo. I just don't see a market for the feature.

      And for the record, I thought the iPod Photo was a stupid idea; I have no desire to show photos on an iPod, my photos don't generally look all that good on a 2" screen without their full color gamut. However, I would like it if my current (non-Photo) iPod could show album art, and I'd probably buy a Photo if I was shopping for one now.

      Adding video capability to the iPod Photo would be a very simple thing. Just have it play silly little mpeg/avi/mov's that digicams take.

      Adding really crappy video capability, with some hacked-up import tool to convert those videos to an appropriate format (lots of screen shots), would be sort of easy, once you accounted for dealing with the umpteen million different video formats on the PC (MPEG at what resolution? Frame rate? Encoding? Etc.). Either Apple gets the fun of saying "Most of your videos won't work", or they get to write a user-friendly transcoding tool. Easier said than done.

      But no, Steve Jobs says you don't want to watch a whole movie on an iPod, plus there are no movies you can legally put on an iPod, so they won't even let you watch your little digicam flics.

      There are plenty of movies I can legally put on an iPod; anything I made, I can legally put on an iPod. Or were you referring to 'legally buy from Steve Jobs'? Here's a thought - which came first, the iPod or the iTMS? (Hint: iPod. By about a year and a half. iTMS was likely not an integral part of the iPod strategy; rather, as

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    27. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1

      You've gone mad. My whole argument is predicated on the assumption that the iPod Photo can play videos. TFA appears to indicate that it can.

      *IF* it can, all of your technical and cost arguments are moot. If it can't, then I no longer hold my position. Get it? I'll concede if my premises are wrong. You should look into the same.

      Your argument about "no one wants it" doesn't stand up. The fact that people are asking about it shows they do. If they can add it (ie: the power is already there, how hard is it to support the *3* video formats that cameras use?), why not? It's like the little games. Few people were really begging for them, and they garner less attention than video is right now. Who cares, toss it in, it's a nice little feature. Their reason is not technical, it's political. Apple would rather poo-poo all video (to make fun of Creative and MS and pals). Putting even limited video support legitimizes the competitors.

      You mention OGG, which is a good point. The old iPods can't decode OGG Vorbis in realtime (some seem to think the CPU actually can, but no one actually has done it, while this guy has done a video). iTunes has an OGG icon in the .app bundle. Think about what that means. (hint: it means Apple has OGG support in house for iTunes (or at least has done some work on it), and that the likliest hold-up (the iPod) is keeping it out). Maybe we'll see OGG Vorbis support soon. Like showing video files (and like importing WMAs) what does it hurt to add OGG Vorbis to the supported playback formats?

    28. Re:Apple losing direction by ggy · · Score: 1

      Err... no. It was (and is) successful because it's easy to use. It does what most people want and not much more.

      And if that's not innovative, what is?

    29. Re:Apple losing direction by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Nope. The iPod made its way to the top by being *simple*. No useless features. No features that *sort-of* work. No features that make the thing a pain-in-the-butt to deal with. It did 1 thing and did that 1 thing well, simply, and trouble-free. Now it does a couple things well, simply, and trouble-free.

      Well, I'd say that's one of the reasons. I think another significant reason was iTunes. That bit of software made it easy to "Rip, Mix, Upload to my damn iPod". Plus you could buy songs online without any hassle. It's a combination of having the player and the software and the content in a neat integrated package. That's something that no other MP3 player manufacturer offers.

      This isn't because Apple can't figure out how to do these things-- you just won't see it in a commercially available product until Apple feels it has it all worked out into a simple interface. And when I say simple, I mean like the scroll-wheel design for the interface, or the fact that there's only 1 in/out port (the dock connector). Apple likes their designs to be fool-proof.

      Yeah, well, Apple didn't design the iPod. They bought the entire product design and concept from PortalPlayer. Read the history on Wired. The PortalPlayer guy specifically mentions a "Napster like service" as a critical element in the success of the player.

    30. Re:Apple losing direction by nine-times · · Score: 1
      Well, I'd say that's one of the reasons.

      Sure, there are more reasons, but if I had to pick one reason that the iPod was successful while others weren't, I'd say it was because it wasn't frustrating to use (while others were).

      I think another significant reason was iTunes. That bit of software made it easy to "Rip, Mix, Upload to my damn iPod".

      I'd include that in the "ease of use" idea. They looked at the whole use of the device, and removed the annoying aspects (which included, "How do I get my music on to this thing?")

      Plus you could buy songs online without any hassle.

      The iPod was a winner even before iTMS. Sure, now, it's a selling point for the iPod, but even before the store opened, the iPod was doing way better than the competition.

      Yeah, well, Apple didn't design the iPod.

      Doesn't matter. Apple released it as an 'Apple product', and I'm only saying that you won't see a commercially available 'Apple product' that doesn't have certain sorts of simplicity in it's design. (Plus, if I recall, Apple took the idea from PortalPlayer and redesigned it. But again, that's not the point.)

    31. Re:Apple losing direction by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

      Bra sagt, Groggy :-)

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    32. Re:Apple losing direction by ggy · · Score: 1

      Tack! :) Skulle du ha lust att slänga iväg ett mail till mig, så jag/vi slipper bränna karma på att snacka här? ;) (Och hur kunde du veta att det var jag?! :) )

    33. Re:Apple losing direction by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      TFA appears that the iPod Photo can work as a flipbook at some undetermined framerate. This does not equate to 'can play video'.

      Also, you are morally bankrupt and intellectually bereft, you smell like hamsters, and your father was a rodent with no incisors, because that's pretty much where this argument is headed.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    34. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1

      TFA appears that the iPod Photo can work as a flipbook at some undetermined framerate. This does not equate to 'can play video'.

      That's *exactly* what 'can play video means'. The QuickTime on TFA plays at 30fps. The photos on the iPod Photo change at the same rate as the QuickTime video.

      That's it, end of story. It doesn't have to play DV video for 2+ hours, it just has to play back stored images with sound. iTunes already transcodes jpegs, why not, if it can't play back raw AVI/MOV/MPG files (that even a 386 can, and cell phones for that matter), transcode them as well to .podav files if it has to?

      Also, you are morally bankrupt and intellectually bereft, you smell like hamsters, and your father was a rodent with no incisors, because that's pretty much where this argument is headed.

      You're the one who decided to go there. I actually have evidence you are being an obtuse moron.

      Cases in point (paraphrased): "It can only act as a flipbook, that's nothing like a movie" or "Sony's battery is smaller than the iPod's and it can only run (an lcd, tape drive, record head, optics system, video processor and DV encoder) for 2 hours!"

    35. Re:Apple losing direction by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      That's *exactly* what 'can play video means'.

      No, it means it can playback a sequence of uncompressed frames. It has no capability of taking a video file in a given codec, decoding and displaying it. That's playing video.

      The QuickTime on TFA plays at 30fps.

      No, its a 15 FPS video.

      The photos on the iPod Photo change at the same rate as the QuickTime video.

      No, they don't. They change at the rate they are driven by the scroll wheel - neither you nor I have any evidence at all as to how fast they are actually changing and whether frames are being dropped, and the only good way to prove it would be to export a video where each frame consisted of the frame number, then try to play it synchronously while capturing it with a high-speed camera to tell us exactly which frames are expressing and which are not.

      That's it, end of story. It doesn't have to play DV video for 2+ hours, it just has to play back stored images with sound. iTunes already transcodes jpegs, why not, if it can't play back raw AVI/MOV/MPG files (that even a 386 can, and cell phones for that matter), transcode them as well to .podav files if it has to?

      No, it doesn't have to. Because that feature is worthless.

      Why not transcode raw AVI, MOV, and MPG? Because there's no such thing as a raw AVI, MOV, or MPG file? They're wrappers (well, MPEG is not a wrapper technically, but MPG can refer to several different video formats in my experience.) Is that MOV file an MPEG-4 video file? Is it a Sorenson coded file? How about that AVI? Is it ISO MPEG-4? Cinepak? Some DivX variant? Is it Indeo encoded? Is the MPEG an MPEG1, 2 or 4? Are we going to support all of these? Only one of them? How do we deal with people complaining if we only support one of them? Who's going to add the transcoding functions into iTunes? How much do we have to pay them to do it? Who's going to buy it as a result of that feature being added? And most importantly, why should we bother?

      "Sony's battery is smaller than the iPod's and it can only run (an lcd, tape drive, record head, optics system, video processor and DV encoder) for 2 hours!"

      Sony's battery is smaller than the iPods, and it can only run the LCD, viewfinder, optics and electronics for around 2 hours. If you add in the encoder, tape drive, and record head, it will usually run for significantly less. The iPod's battery will run electronics, a grayscale LCD, and a hard drive (which sucks a large portion of the juice) for 8 hours. Note: that hard drive, when its reading, consumes roughly 1.4 W; this is about 5 times my estimate for average iPod power draw. Now, to play video, we wouldn't need anything like continuous read; however, that average power draw of 0.3W would likely go up. The factor by which it would go up can be calculated as follows (assuming its just flipbooking JPEGs):

      MP3 data rate of 128 kbps produces our 8 hour runtime estimate. A 220x176 (native screen resolution) JPEG requires roughly 10k on average. Minimum video FPS would be 15; less is just not acceptable, even for crappy digicam movies (which shoot, usually, at 15 fps). So our minimum data rate for a movie would be 150 kbps. We'd need 2.2 times as much hard drive access for a video as for music, AT A MINIMUM (1x for the sound, 1.2x for the video). Add to this the additional power required for the brighter LED being on all the time (note: Apple rates the iPod Photo for slideshow + music for only 5 hours battery, as opposed to 15 hours for just music). You're probably looking at 3-4 hours, maybe less, for playing video. Which, for playing 15 second digicam movies is totally meaningless, but for playing anything anyone would actually care about, is meaningful.

      The insults were just returning what you'd begun; mostly, they were to point out that our argument is between two people, one of whom (you) is not listening to the other (me). If you don't want to pay attention to the pretty obvious difficulties, that's fine. But ignoring the very real (and far more important, to Apple) financial issues, is what makes you intellectually bereft.

      Which is a nice way of saying "obtuse moron".

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    36. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1

      No, its a 15 FPS video.

      No, it's 30. Command-i (control-i in Windows).

      Movie FPS: 30

      They change at the rate they are driven by the scroll wheel - neither you nor I have any evidence at all as to how fast they are actually changing and whether frames are being dropped

      Press the left arrow on your keyboard. Each press is one frame. Watch the little video on the iPod. There are places it changes each time you press the arrow. Thus it can change photos at least at 30 fps.

      You're either a complete moron or a troll. Either way you've got a problem.

      Because there's no such thing as a raw AVI, MOV, or MPG file?

      Like hell there isn't. Take an avi, mov or mpg, and look at the bits. That's the raw file. AVI and movs are wrappers, mpg is not. Regardless, it doesn't matter unless you mean to imply you can't transcode them? Learn to address the relevant facts.

      Whatever you want though, I'm done here. I suggest you look into your innate lack of intelligence or your sociopathic trollness. Whatever your problem, you could benefit from a little help.

    37. Re:Apple losing direction by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      From the article, jackass.

      The frame rate of the movie we downloaded was 15 frames per second, we'll export the same in QuickTime.

      15 FPS. Not 30.

      Next.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    38. Re:Apple losing direction by node+3 · · Score: 1

      From the article, jackass.

      The frame rate of the movie we downloaded was 15 frames per second, we'll export the same in QuickTime.

      15 FPS. Not 30.

      Next.


      The quicktime file is 30fps. Check it for yourself. The guy exported the photos at 15fps to the iPod (going by what you typed), but when he thumbed through, sometimes he was at or beyond 30fps.

      You are a moron. Look at the QuickTime movie. It is a 30fps movie, and there are parts where the iPod's display changes in each frame. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what that means, it does, however, take a non-retard.

  24. That's great but.. by DeepFried · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I have another great solution. This one is time tested and will not drain your batteries.

    Step 1.Print all the individual frames to paper
    Step 2.Animate!

    --


    Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard disk?
  25. Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mirrordot mirrors of the movies: Quicktime and WMV

  26. ack by krunchyfrog · · Score: 5, Funny

    How the hell can you scroll a porn movie, hold a kleenex and rub the lamp at the same time?

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
    1. Re:ack by jkovacik · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rub the lamp first, then have the genie hold the kleenex? :)

    2. Re:ack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your girlfriend to help, or if you own an iPod, your boy-toy-friend.

    3. Re:ack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell can you scroll a porn movie, hold a kleenex and rub the lamp at the same time?

      Easy. You hold your kleenex in your left hand. Hold your lamp in your right hand. Use your lamp to scroll the iPod, which rubs it at the same time (if you are left handed, reverse the side).

      No, honey, I wasn't rubbing my iPod with my thing... I was just solving the problem this guy post on /., really!

  27. A way to do this without the ipod by raider_red · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You could take the individual frames and print them onto paper. Then you could use it as a flip book and play the soundtrack on your computer. The only problem is that we'll pretty much wipe out a whole forest just to run one movie.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  28. Re:Too much time? by micromoog · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    What's worse, this, or someone with a fucking free iPod link in their .sig? Hasn't that horrible, horrible fad burned out yet?

  29. What's the point of being able to play video? by arhar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I the only one who does not need this feature? I listen to my iPod when I'm on the train, when I'm walking somewhere, or when I'm working out.. all of these activities require using your eyes, so watching video is out of the question. Am in the minority here?

    1. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      I commute quite a bit (about 2 hours on trains each day) and a gMini is perfect. I watch MST3K episodes when I'm stationary, and when I'm moving (for example, walking from train to train) I leave the earbuds in and switch to music mode. Exactly like an iPod at that point.

    2. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      Do you happen to be a train driver?

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    3. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      Umm, are you driving the train? What exactly are you using your eyes for?

      As for working out, please explain why gyms put TVs in front of the exercise equipment. It sure seems like people are able to watch them and exercise at the same time.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      Exactly why do you need to use your eyes while you're on the train? While you're on any kind of transport system would be a great time to use something like this (unless you're the driver, pilot, conducter, etc).

    5. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by diqmay · · Score: 1

      being on the train requires using your eyes? I usually don't pay much attention unless the conductor has a heart attack and I, in a fit of supreme heroism guide the train to a safe stop at the nearest station.

      Otherwise I read a book which, if I'm not mistaken uses my eyes.

      Diq

    6. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by scribblej · · Score: 1

      If taking the train required the use of my eyes, I'd get a lot less sleep on a daily basis.

      What kind of train are you on, anyhow? Are you the conductor?

      If you are; I agree. No video for you.

    7. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      What do you need your eyes for when you're on the train or working out?

    8. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      How does riding on a train require the use of your eyes? I think that would be a great place for a video player.

      And for working out, what about a stair machine, or the exercise bike. Why be forced to share a wall mounted tv with people there when you can watch whatever the hell you want.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      please explain why gyms put TVs in front of the exercise equipment

      That's because so many of us would work out even less if we had to tear ourselves away from The Feed for that long.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    10. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by TekMonkey · · Score: 1

      I for one am glad Apple has created an iPod Photo rather than replacing the normal iPod. I have an iPod for my music collection. Not my image collection. Not my video collection. If they do add video capabilites (which I think they are well able to do), they would do best by marketing it as an iPod Video or another product not affiliated with the iPod. And if I do get one, it won't replace my iPod, it will just be something extra.

    11. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by arhar · · Score: 1

      To respond to various people that said I don't need my eyes on the train: yeah, that was a typo. I don't need my eyes on the train. However, constant starting into 2x2 screen with bad resolution surely will cause blindness in process, so my original statement about needing eyes still stands :-)

    12. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by isorox · · Score: 1

      when I'm on the train...using your eyes

      What are you, the driver? I use my laptop to watch DVD's all the time on my commute

    13. Re:What's the point of being able to play video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not getting robbed or falling on a treadmill perhaps?

  30. joke of the day by l3v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounded so really ridiculous, I had to read it again. Then, it seemed even more so :) I laughed so loud I hope the neighbors didn't think I went nuts :D

    So really, this is something a regular sane fellas would do with their iPods :D Oh, come on :)

    You even can grab a dead cat and pull it with a piece of rope, but it won't run, even if you mew in the process :D

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  31. Geek Cool, or just lack of patience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry for the AC, but I hate registering even for good things like /.

    As far as this goes "ipod and video" goes, didn't Jobs already specifically say that the iPod isn't already supporting video because of battery life?

    Look, this hack is neat just for being geek cool, but seriously. Wait two years, you will have a video iPod and apple will have a "video streamed directly to your home theatre" device. In the mean time, just copy the dang avis and mpegs to the ipod HD and plug it into your HTPC!!!

    Or maybe I missed the point of mobile, inconvenient video. Silly me with my "laptop".

    And yes. It is 2:45 PM. My Systems are working great, I went home early, and started drinking scotch. There I said it. Yeah. I'm drunk.

  32. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it won't until I get mine. ;)

    Free iPod Photo | Free Flat Screens | It really works!

  33. Apples New Service by Ionizer7 · · Score: 1

    I can see it already, for just 10$ you pay someone to scroll through the slideshow for you. It would be just like watching a movie, but without the work. A human as an iPod accessory? I wouldn't doubt it.

    1. Re:Apples New Service by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Surely humans were created as iPod accessories..

      note the ear, perfectly formed to receive an ice-white earphone, and the elegance of the opposable grip of the hands which seems tailor-made to holding the iPod and operating its controls.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Apples New Service by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      No.

      Humans were created by water to carry it uphill. All other uses are a mere coincedence.

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  34. Worst ... Hack ... Ever by stinkyfingers · · Score: 1

    Might as well drive around in a "car" with no floorboards so you can accelerate and brake with your bare feet.

  35. GBA by KillaKen187 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Gameboy Advance SP can play movies too. No need to convert the files either. Just put on CF and go. :) My brother has one and it was pretty cool until he updated the firmware and broke it... bummer.

    1. Re:GBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm..says they are working towards continious improvement...seems to me they need to continually improve their English.

    2. Re:GBA by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I was looking at their website, and while they list the products, I can't seem to find anywhere on there to order them, can you help me out with an order link?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:GBA by KillaKen187 · · Score: 1

      Here's a link... just googled 'GBA movie player buy'
      http://www.allmediaoutlet.com/allmedia/prodDetail. do?kitNbr=1179
      Only $30 good deal.

  36. Disturbance by finkployd · · Score: 1

    It suddenly felt as if a million server threads cried out in pain and were suddenly silenced.

  37. Re:Oh, too cool for crank operated video now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, what's with the snobbery? 1. Look at the catchphrase for ./ 2. Hang your heads in shame. 3. Go maintain your useless GameCube Beowulf cluster, or whatever other geeky hobby you've chosen, and stop attacking people for doing their useless fun stuff.

    ...and now, my work done, I'm off to polish my red and blue Snaggletooth dolls, erm, Action Figures!

  38. link does not work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get rejected when I try to go there, could some one post the text here.

  39. Re:Too much time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says you, who have the time to complain on slashdot about some people having too much time on their hands.

  40. Synchronising sound with video... by mikael · · Score: 1

    Surely it would be possible to use a few bytes of the image to save the offset within the sound file that should be played?

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Synchronising sound with video... by stevey · · Score: 1

      Sure you could, if you had access to the firmware source code.

      Of course if that were the case you'd probably be doing something else, like port some small videoplayback codec to the device to attack the problem really.

      (Or add Vorbis support ;)

  41. how many free plugs is engadnet going to get on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    christ!

  42. Alt links by BostonRob · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google Cache w/o photos: Google Link

    Mirrordot.org also has a copy available:Mirrordot.org

    --
    Big Dig-ing until the money is gone...
    1. Re:Alt links by unsupported · · Score: 1

      Mirrordot.org pulled it. Hrm... is there a mirrormirrordot.org (who's the fairest of them all)?

      -Un

      --
      Yopu for you?
    2. Re:Alt links by unsupported · · Score: 1

      Ok, there, it's back up.

      --
      Yopu for you?
  43. great.... by .silG.00 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    if sites with images die... why put a direct link to a VIDEO file on /. ???
    bittorrent ppl...

    --
    ------
    mmmm round and soft...
  44. So let me get this straight.... by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
    The video links show a compressed video of an iPod playing a manually iterated frame-sequence of a compressed video?

    Now there's some resolution the industry can really get behind. Kwality with a K, baby!

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:So let me get this straight.... by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      I want a video of someone using this trick to play *this* video on their iPod Photo. Hooray for recursion!

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  45. The next hack... by JediTrainer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now I'm waiting for someone to visit Radio Shack, buy one of those little motors and hook that up to the scroll. Play with resistors to get it to the right speed.

    Bonus points if you can pull juice right from the iPod's battery...

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    1. Re:The next hack... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Now I'm waiting for someone to visit Radio Shack, buy one of those little motors and hook that up to the scroll. Play with resistors to get it to the right speed.

      Forget playing with resistors. Include a small optical sensor and a timer. When you convert the video to still frames, insert a small white spot in one corner of the screen in one of every n frames. You can then set up a feedback loop that automatically measures and maintains a constant frame rate.

      Of course, doing that would be really stupid. :)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  46. OUCH! by bennomatic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can someone say "Carpal Tunnel Syndrom"? That's begging for a repetetive stress injury, if you ask me!

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:OUCH! by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      s/rom/rome/
      my bad.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:OUCH! by Inuchance · · Score: 1

      Can someone SPELL "Carpal Tunnel Syndrome"? (Sorry, I just had to)

      Anyway, it looks like a much better hand motion than someone COULD be making while.. watching movies... *cough*

  47. Strangely masturbational by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    About the way the person using the ipod worked that jog shuttle - I didn't know Lucas' final chapter in the trilogy could elicit such erotic feelings...

  48. Flick through static pictures, why of all the... by Trogre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I'll stick with my zaurus, thanks.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  49. Memories of Diablo by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    THIS is something I can get into. I like my movies with a side of RMS.

  50. This is one of the stupidest things I have heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really am just so speechless I hate to post something. If you are looking for an mp3 player that actually has half assed video then look at the new iriver, as they came out with a firmware capable of playing low res xvid files or something. Yeah it sucks but it's more news than this is.

  51. Seems like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more trouble than it's worth.

  52. sort of like... by jxyama · · Score: 1

    you can use the original iPod to have conversation by putting thousands of mp3's of voice recorded words and scrolling quickly one from another to piece a coherent sentence?

    1. Re:sort of like... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Is that you, Mr. Burroughs?

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  53. Printer hack by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This is like saying that your printer can play movies if you print out each frame and then flip through them.

    Get a Hewlett Packard Color LaserJet 4650DN (duplex for double-sided printing) and plug it into three-phase power and it'll print fast enough to do this...

    Of course, you won't be able to hear the soundtrack over the whine of rollers and gears burning themselves up...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  54. Re:Wow, like those old cameras you have to crank.. by Collision891 · · Score: 1

    because then there would not be much of a reason to buy an video ipod if they ever came out with one in the future

  55. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lameness filter stops posting within 20 seconds, but it doesn't fucking stop dickheads posting 'why is this news?' on every fucking story. If you're not interested, why the fuck did you click 'reply'? Why don't you fuck off somewhere else? Go do something else that interests you.

    Read this story - YOU'RE A DICK.

  56. This just in! by 1019 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fantastic new invention found!
    Still images placed on a reel and handcranked through light and synched with a nearby phonograph result in what is being called a "motion picture".

    For this breaking story and more, stay tuned to our radio broadcast!

    --
    shame on us / for all we have done / and all we ever were / just zeroes and ones
    1. Re:This just in! by stud9920 · · Score: 0

      Popular film predates radio consumer level radio broadcast, which was called 'wireless' anyway.

  57. Apparently their web server is crank-operated... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Keep cranking, guys! You can keep up with the load! Go, go, go!!!

    I saw this video a couple days ago. It is funny. THe guy speeds up and slows down a little, and doesn't keep it 'perfectly' in sync, but it's pretty good. (If the click sound were off, and they had it zoomed so you could only see the screen, not the guy frantically scrolling; I would have thought they had actually figured out how to play video on it.)

    So, how long until some company makes a 'scroller' device that automatically scrolls at 30 fps?

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  58. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From LordBadak's journal

    We voted for Bush because he won't apologize to the world for doing what he believed was right, and damn the consequences.

    Oh well done, that's a great arguement. Someday you might learn that these 'consequences' you speak of will actually matter.

  59. Wow by Powercntrl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jerky low-res video, out of sync audio, why, it's a perfect pocket-size recreation of XingMPEG on my 486 laptop!

    Course, there's probably some old geezer who thinks us youngins have it real good cause in his day he had to crank the projecter by hand. Oh, wait...

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  60. Oh Brother by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    " According to the article, you use Quicktime Pro to export the movie as thousands of individual frames which you export to the iPod, send the soundtrack to the iPod as well, then, if you haven't guessed by now, while playing the soundtrack, put the iPod into slideshow mode and use the scroll wheel to manually keep the frames in synch with the sound. "

    Man... imagine porn becoming a workout.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Oh Brother by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Well, it was already a workout...

      Now you can exercise both hands at once, though.

    2. Re:Oh Brother by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      see it that way: You can finally train BOTH hands...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  61. Commodore64 does exactly the same by Mehigh · · Score: 1

    Hi this is the same method used to play movies on Commodore 128 with the SCPU running Wings OS http://wings.webhop.org/ Greg Nacu took out the frames out of the movies with Quicktime and extracted the wav file. He wrote a program in C for Wings OS which calls the jpeg rendered for every frame and the wav player for the audio. We have movies on Commodore now :) Check it out

  62. Or... by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

    You can get a real portible device that is made to play movies like the iriver pmp. Yeah, cuz i want to walk around with my flaming pink photo ipod and pimp out quicktime slideshows with sound.

  63. Ever Heard of Bit Torrent? by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1
    Binary links posted as a DL (Direct Link).

    People haven't learned about Bit Torrent yet?!?

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  64. iRiver H3xx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The US iRiver H320 and H340 models can playback XVID if you flash them with the recently release v1.20 Korean FW (iRiver is a Korean company). Don't worry, all the menus will still be in English. The video does need to be down-converted to the proper resolution and framerate before playback, but it is a trivial process that can be automated using VirtualDub or any other number of programs. At $300, the H320 is by far the most versatile DAP on the market, imo.

  65. flipbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'cause if you take the total cost of ink cartridges used in making that flipbook --- the iPod is cheaper....

  66. Pre-dubbed martial arts movies! by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

    Remember Police Academy? Now you can dub martial arts movies yourself, in the privacy of your own home...

  67. Gilligan's Island by bitswapper · · Score: 1



    This seems like something that the Professor on Gilligan's Island would think up to play a movie with an iPod that washes up on shore one day. Then, they would somehow make a raft with it to get rescued or something, or use it to signal for help (may a ship full of iPods washes up on shore...)

    Clearly falls under 'psycho hacks'

  68. Slashdotted... by evenSong · · Score: 0

    Damn it Slashdot. Stop killing servers.

  69. HAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sound impossible?

    no, it just sounds stupid.

  70. Fantastic. by cbreaker · · Score: 0

    Good post man.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  71. That's why man made PDAs by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    Exactly.

    I use my 3rd-Gen iPod for exactly what I bought it for: playing music while I'm doing other things.

    If I wanted to share photos with people, a PDA would be a better route. Especially when you can store and view your photos on a PDA for the same $499 price, and have nearly infinite expandability, a larger screen and video playback.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  72. reeks of potential by pancakegeels · · Score: 1

    Seems to me there is a bit of potential here for a comic book viewer. Anything longer than a movie trailer is just silly, but flicking through a comic is a pretty natural thing. If your techno-savvy ('geeky') then you probably already have your fave online comic. It wouldnt be any effort to subscribe, update daily before you un-dock your pod for the train.

  73. Ghetto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How fucking ghetto.
    This is dumb.

  74. 5GB CF card by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Seagate 5GB CF hard disk, about $250.
    That should be enough for a couple of commutes on the subway before you'll want to load something new on it.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:5GB CF card by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Everything iPod related is overpriced. I own one, and I am pissed off that all the accessories just never drop in price. As if the original iPod unit wasn't enough.

  75. Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by joelhayhurst · · Score: 3, Informative

    Watch the Apple Special Event video from Oct 2004. Skip ahead to about 12:35 in the video. Jobs says, in a humorous fashion, that he believes the competition is making a mistake with video on portable players, and lists reasons he believes they are impractical.

    The arguments he makes are:

    • Competing video players are too heavy and cumbersome.
    • Users don't have video content.
    • The screens are too small.

    I think it's safe to say there won't be a video iPod.

    1. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs has also said that he doesn't feel that video can be distributed online in the same way as music currently, because it would lack the instant gratification that you get with music. I'm not convinced. I would like to be able to buy movies through iTMS, download them and either watch them on the computer or burn them to DVD. I'm not sure being able to put them on an iPod would be useful. I certainly wouldn't want to watch them on something that small (unless it came with a miniature projector that could display a laptop-sized screen on the back of a train chair), but it might be convenient if the iPod could be plugged into a TV / projector (as, I believe, the latest model can). The technology is not really ready for a video iPod yet, but I think there is a market for video content through iTMS, particularly television - I'd be more than willing to pay for the ability to watch reasonable quality TV at a time of my choice without adverts, and paying the TV studios more directly would increase the ability for less popular series' to remain commercially viable (e.g. Futurama and FireFly).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      And I think its safe to say that while Steve Jobs is a smart business man, he's completely off his rocker on this one.

      First off, people are going to be using these picture ipods in the field for digital photography. What makes him think video editors wouldn't want that capability as well? Peter Jackson had been using his iPod's harddrive to ferry files back and forth, I'm sure he would have bought one.

      The size factor is something that can be worked around with improvements in technology.

      As for people having a lack of video content. Um...hi Steve, welcome to the internet circa 2004, where people send tons of little video clips back and forth, the largest portion of traffic on the internet is in the form of people using bittorrent to transfer movies and tv shows, and where porn is more easily accessible than ever before. If that doesn't mean there's a ripe market for it, then I don't know what does.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, now you not only want a video player, but a video editor in an iPod? Welcome to the world circa 2004, I hope you enjoy your trip from 2014.

    4. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, it's not Steve's fault that he's living five years in the past.

      But he's pretty much right about the screen size... at least on his OWN product. Everyone else's video player screens are a good size.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Please quote from my post where I say I want a video editor in an iPod. I just want a way to store and watch video that I've been shooting in the field. This would be an incredible way to organize and view all your various takes.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Of course this is coming from the same guy who decided to finally release a headless iMac and sell it 3 times the price it is worth. (G4 Cube)

      He can be pretty clueless sometimes.

    7. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by ortcutt · · Score: 1

      Maybe if I were more clueless I could be worth $2.6 billion too. Damn you cluefulness!!!

    8. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Competing video players are too heavy and cumbersome.

      My Archos Gmini 400 is no larger or heavier than an iPod. And it was released 2 months prior to Jobs' statements.

      Users don't have video content.

      Sure I do! The challenge, and I will admit there's really no user-friendly way of doing this yet, is figuring out which files will play on it as is--that is, MPEG4-SP video AVI files (eg, DivX or XviD w/o bidi filtering), no more than 640x400 resolution, no more than 30fps, with IMA-ADPCM or MP3 CBR soundtrack--and figuring out how to convert other content to meet those specs (if possible).

      The screens are too small.

      Irrelevant. This is a PERSONAL video player.

      I can hold the 2.2" screen a foot away from my eyes, and it takes up the same amount of my viewing area as a 30" television across the room. Uses a whole lot electricity that way, too.

      Jobs would be smart not to put a Video iPod on the market NOW, but he would be foolish to NEVER put one out.

    9. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by generic-man · · Score: 1

      You can't use an iPod Photo to view images that you have downloaded off a digital camera.

      You can use the Belkin media reader to pull JPEG images off a memory card, but they won't appear in the iPod Photo's interface. The reason is that the photos are handled through iTunes, which shrinks them down to 320x240 (unless you ask not to) and syncs them with the iPod.

      So the iPod Photo can't even be used as a full-featured image tank even with a $80-$100 accessory bolted onto it.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    10. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think it's safe to say there won't be a video iPod.

      I disagree... to support my position, you need only look at the prevalence of handheld TVs.

      Oh, wait...

    11. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that doesn't mean there's a ripe market for it, then I don't know what does.

      The content you describe is pirated. Piracy is not something that Apple condones. They will not release a product marketed at pirates. Let other companies do that, while Apple still hojillions of iPods.

      Also, I don't see how piracy creates a market. By definition, pirates are people that don't like to pay for things...

  76. pr0n? by attam · · Score: 1

    am i the only one who sees how FUCKING HARD it would be to watch porn AND _uhhh_ *enjoy* said porn, in this manner? ;)

    *ducks*

  77. In related news: by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is possible to play movies using a book. Simple use Quicktime Pro to export the movie as thousands of individual frames, print each one, bind them together and flick through them really fast. Audio can be obtained by copying the soundtrack onto a cassette tape and listening to it with your walkman.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  78. Look mom!!!! by ARRRLovin · · Score: 1

    A $500 flipbook!

    --
    -Randy
  79. if it wasn't for engadget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot might be out of business!

    1. Re:if it wasn't for engadget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engadetdot: Ad revenue from nerds, shilling that matters.

  80. Thats impossible by Altus · · Score: 1


    even for a computer!

    no its not... I used to manually synch slide shows with music on my TI-85 back home... and its not much bigger than an iPod.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  81. Hahahahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst.....hack......ever

  82. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    if your this guy...

  83. Wow! Engadget *again*, huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should just rent space at the Slahdot offices, alongside Roland. Or perhaps they already do.

  84. Worst. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst. Show. Of. Brand. Loyalty. Ever.

    (like, this new iPod suck but we're going try to fake that it sucks less. Lame.)

  85. Can't you automate this? by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you somehow hack the iPod so it plays a slideshow at like 30fps instead of the 1 frame per 5 seconds or whatever it is normally? Then you could just hit play to start the slide show and it would actually look like a movie.

  86. Crazy Freaks by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    This is no more a movie player than an apple fans blow up doll is a real girlfriend. (But hey -- points for trying. I would say buy something that can play a real movie and get on with life.)

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  87. You can write a real iPod video player, you know.. by pcosta · · Score: 1

    iPod Hacks has an article about developing Quicktime applications for iPod. Pretty interesting stuff.

  88. Good news/bad news by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    Good news - ipr0n

    Bad news - The spinning of the dials stuff precludes having any hands free for any other purpose.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  89. Re:Too much time? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Unfortunately it hasn't. And while I absolutely hate it, I have to hand it to the scummy company that created this scheme. Instead of spamming people themselves, they get people who would normally be against receiving such spam to go out and become spammers themselves.

    People have already started posting ipod links on all student email at my school, and when I pointed out that if one person did that, more people would, and it would create a bunch of clutter and NOBODY would get their iPod, well, lets just say the person who sent the link wasn't very appreciative, but he's not that bright anyways.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  90. High tech flipbook cartoon by tjhanley · · Score: 1

    It is interactive!

    --
    --- /. is like tivo for news
  91. Re:Flick through static pictures, why of all the.. by taernim · · Score: 1

    Doctor Zaurus, Doctor Zaurus? ;-)

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  92. Ist possible... by Silver_Seagull · · Score: 1

    I don't own an iPod, I'm too poor a university student to afford one of those fancy things, so this question comes from ignorance... Would it be possible to hack the speed of the slideshow, to 1 picture every 1/24th (or 1/30th) of a second? This would save your thumb, and more importantly, your scrollwheel/clickwheel....

  93. Who cares? by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    BIG FRIGGING DEAL!!!

    It's just a portable personal player. Competitors like Archos have been doing video for ages now. Why is it that every time some little incremental improvement comes out for iPod, people get all giddy over it? I mean it's not like they're doing anything new.

    People are like sheep. Follow the crowds. Yippy.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  94. Another chance for Apple to make me want an iPod.. by Silverlancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To start with, for you apple-crazed mods, this isn't a troll.

    iPods are nice. Now when I bought my mp3 player a year ago, I got a 20GB Lyra for $180. Since the cheapest iPod was $400, it was definitely worth it. Plus the Lyra didn't have the battery problems the first-gen iPods did, and it had considerably longer battery life.

    Well now iPods are lots cheaper. And they have somewhat better battery life, no dying batteries, and hold more. But if I wanted a new mp3 player today, I still wouldn't get an iPod. Because for the price of an iPod, I can get:

    1. A Creative Zen Touch 20GB, has a touch scroll similar to the iPod's and has 60-80% more battery life. Plus I save $90. And it looks cool like the iPod.

    2. A video player--larger than the Zen or the iPod, but plays both music, video, and all that.

    Now if the iPod, at $300, had number two in there... lets just say it might find its way into my budget :). Basically, Apple needs to solve this "there are better mp3 players for less" problem. They're not going to cut prices (see the fact that their computers cost twice that of an equivalent PC--I simply can't afford a decent G5), so they might as well make what they're already selling better.

  95. Perhaps... by NeoGeo64 · · Score: 1

    They could fool the iPod into thinking something is rubbing the scroll wheel over and over in at a constant speed. The soundtrack could be synced in with the movie and you'd effectively have a portable DVD player.

  96. got a great big convoy Aint she a beautiful sight! by Altus · · Score: 1



    CONVOY!!!

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  97. Re:WTF? by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Seriously, why is this news?"

    Can't you read? It says iPod right there in the subject line.
    • Not only iPod, but iPod + StarWars. It's like two worlds colliding.
  98. Re:What's the point of being able to show photos? by xigxag · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who does not need this feature? I listen to my iPod when I'm on the train, when I'm walking somewhere, or when I'm working out.. all of these activities require using your eyes, so

    Exactly! Oops, somebody forgot to tell Apple.

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  99. Hmm.. by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

    Pretty cool discovery, but I think its too much work. If you have a video you want to watch so bad portably, find a digital camera or something.

  100. Why do this when you can do *real* movie playback? by Brand+X · · Score: 1

    Back in June, there was an article in MacTech detailing an iPod hack to enable Quicktime playback, written in (of all things) Snobol.

    Of course, on investigation, it turned out to be a misscheduled April story...

    --
    -- Still waiting for the Nike endorsement
  101. Animated GIF? by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried an animated GIF on the thing? Apple's specs say it'll show GIFs... If it does, won't this guy feel silly.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  102. or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy

  103. Worse. Much MUCH Worse. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Hey, I've managed to get 3 confirmations by having a fucking free ipod link in my sig, thankyouverymuch ^_^

    Two more and that's a free iPod for doing absolutely nothing but registering and cancelling some stupid promotion, so pardon me if I feed into that horrible, horrible fad :D

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Worse. Much MUCH Worse. by micromoog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's spam. I'm not sure if you folks don't realize that, are in denial, or just don't care, but you're getting paid to send unsolicited advertisements. SPAM.

    2. Re:Worse. Much MUCH Worse. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      A) Nobody who signs up is sending anybody unsolicited advertisements. Fact.
      B) The only people who get advert spam are the people who sign up. You don't have to, aren't forced to and won't get a lick of spam unless you voluntarily agree to it.
      C) The above is made crystal clear when you sign up. it's not as if you don't know what you're getting into.
      D) Anybody with half a brain uses a fake email address for exactly that reason. You do have half a brain, right?
      E) I have no problem with a win-win situation. I get an ipod. It's entirely voluntary. Free ipods undoubtably gets a commision for my eyeballs and the companies get mass marketing exposure. On top of the fact I can cancel the offer in most cases without charge, and once I shut down that bogus email account, I'll never hear from them again.

      Frankly, it's tough to even call it spam when the entire process is not only voluntary, but you actually get back something of value in return for your time. Find me another piece of traditional spam that does that.

      I guess that qualifies me under "just don't care". It's a good deal. Suck it up.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    3. Re:Worse. Much MUCH Worse. by Inuchance · · Score: 1

      > you're getting paid to send unsolicited advertisements

      and how!

    4. Re:Worse. Much MUCH Worse. by micromoog · · Score: 1
      You missed the point entirely. Promoting the scheme (in your case via your Slashdot sig) IS the spam. It's advertising. It's unsolicited. I'm receiving it, even though I don't want it. You're abusing a shared medium (Slashdot) to send it.

      Don't even bother to tell me I can turn of sigs if I don't want to see it; that's exactly equivalent to "if you don't like spam, don't use email".

      It's a good deal for you (free stuff at the expense of everyone else), but it's polluting the Internet.

  104. Click track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gives a new meaning to the term, "click track."

  105. ObInfiniteCats by tunah · · Score: 1
    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  106. Simple answer. by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

    No.

    Once I would have an opportunity to watch video trough some VR glasses, I could consider. Otherwise, I don't think portable video is going to succeed...

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
  107. Emulate the iPod's emulation of quicktime! by jensen404 · · Score: 1

    You can emulate the feel of an iPod emulating Quicktime by dragging the slider in Quicktime to watch the Quicktime video of the iPod emulating Quicktime.

  108. Wow.. by I7D · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a...

    forget it

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
  109. Milking by Entropop · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the only reason they didn't include movie playback in this version is so that all the rich schmucks that buy every generation of iPod will have to for out the cash in a couple of months when they include the software that ads movie playback functionality.

  110. Reminds me of a toy I had as a kid by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    As a kid, I had this little hand-held toy that looked like a movie camera. It had a little crank on it, and there were cartridges for the toy that had short silent films on them, like Mickey Mouse cartoons or bits of Star Trek episodes. Point the toy at a light source, look in the little viewfinder, and be entertained. Ah, those were the days.

    And now I see a guy playing a movie trailer in a similar fashion on an iPod, trying to run the wheel at a uniform speed, and I am reminded of my plastic toy. I'd better go see if anyone is selling one of those on eBay.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  111. I think video iPod soon but not that way by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    iTunes has amazing video functionality already. Apple qt trailers offer full screen iTunes view and when you click it, you get full screen video.

    I think apple works with some companies to make small lcd over glasses etc to watch full screen (big) videos now.

    If apple not interested in video on ipod, why put video functionality to iTunes?

  112. I am looking for a cheap mp3 player by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    As everyone knows the prices of electronics are outrageous here in the UK , what would you guys think is the best value for money option here?

    Or is it better to wait till one is in singapore/dubai to buy one?

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  113. Automated spin with motor by ketul · · Score: 1

    this is what i posted on their website...

    How about automatic spin?! You can probably use some electronic products, i.e. a motor and "speed controller", and attach some type of material that would be recognized by those sensors on the wheel.
    .
    .
    .
    And give ur finger(s) some rest...!

  114. a backwards innovation for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a hand cranked pencil sharpenner and some rubber bands will probably alleviate the finger strain.

  115. i love it by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    The clickity sound reminded me of my 2nd grade classes where someone in near the projector had to hold their finger just right or the whole thing would go nuts.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  116. Not good enough by under_clocker · · Score: 1

    Ok thats a swell idea but My cell phone can play regular run of the mill mpegs and mp3's so me thinks that the ipod is still in developement compared to my tmobile phone which also can play streaming audio off the internet and a big ole gnarly bunch of other things... ipod is very cool... but with 1 gig sd cards I can do pretty much the same stuff... and a bunch more...the only thing I see that it has going for it is the 40 gig drive...