Slashdot Mirror


Westerners Migrating to India for Jobs

shonagon53 writes "The BBC reports that quite a few young European tourists stick around in India to work for eSolutions companies who contract outsourced work from European companies. The salaries are mediocre, but you get free housing, great food, snacks à volonté and a free taxi ride to work each morning. Is this the first wave of the much anticipated reverse-migration which will be a hallmark of the 21st century?"

328 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. Work Visas by Hamstij · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So how does that work as far as work visas are concerned? Does the company also arrange for the correct visas or are the "tourists" technically working there illegally?

    1. Re:Work Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Getting a work visa in India is simple: you apply and if you are not on Interpol wanted list and have a employer's job offer, you should expect it in a month.. No other certification or verification is required.

      Welcome!

    2. Re:Work Visas by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm curious about wages. Presumably one of the reasons people were outsourcing to India in the first place was because of lower wages (and expenses in general.) Wouldn't moving to India then, mean taking a paycut? And would the paycut be lower or greater than the savings in expenses? :-/

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Work Visas by wwwillem · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry to say, but if you're asking this type of questions, you're probably not made up for that type of move. BTW, I've lived in Europe, Far-East, now Canada, always "local contract", so I know what I talk about. Back to a good answer, the thing is that if you're young (or young-of-heart), what only matters is that the job pays enough to pay for a decent living. I suppose you read the article, and all those Europeans in India clearly lived well. No hunger, lots of curry, :-) what do you want more!!

      When living overseas, the question is most often not about pay, but more if you can get affordable housing. I lived in Singapore, with a typical rent of 5000 per month. So, it becomes important that an employer is helping to overcome that hurdle. Next thing, what are the taxes. For example, I took in Singapore a big pay cut, but taxes were 10-15%. Oh, did I mention that a good dinner outside would set you back less than 5 bucks?

      I hope you get the gist. Wages or pay cuts say nothing!! It's about income versus cost of living. And when that works our reasonable enough, you should of course have a little mentality of "carpe diem" and not too much worry about your mutual funds, stocks and such. If the latter is important to you, better stay home. But .... you'll miss a lot.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    4. Re:Work Visas by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are signs that 'staying home' may not be the economically 'safe' thing to do anymore. This has nothing to do with outsourcing or offshoring, and everything to do with the imminent collapse of the debt-bubble in the US.

      The DOW, as of yesterday, is up one-half of one-percent from the beginning of the year. Investors are starting to look elsewhere. Meanwhile, some fairly respectable economists are starting to see only a 10% chance of avoiding a coming economic meltdown - I don't just mean the little recession we just had, I mean a serious change in the standard of living.

    5. Re:Work Visas by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Of course I get the gist, that's why I asked the question in the first place!

      If I take a pay cut of $50K/yr, and it ends up saving me only $40K/yr, then I've lost $10K/yr which I could have saved. The quality of living would want to be a damn lot better than what I have now, if I were going to give up that much money.

      On the other hand, if the pay cut was $40K/yr and the savings were $50K/yr, it would be like getting a payrise for almost no effort, and almost a no-brainer (unfortunately I'm married.)

      But to really make a decision, one needs numbers.

      I'm making the same decision on a smaller scale right now, thinking of moving from one city to another. I would save about $20K/yr, but my paycut might be $10-15K/yr. This doesn't seem bad to me based entirely on wages, but the quality of living might be lower (since I'll be within range of family, which can be a pain. LOL!) and my wife isn't entirely convinced yet that we should move. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    6. Re:Work Visas by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are unemployed, a low-paying job is not a pay cut.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    7. Re:Work Visas by citog · · Score: 1

      Possibly, if you have a look at his site (under career) you'll see that he was there from '95 - '98. Not sure what things in Singapore were like overall then but I know people who were here around that time and their companies were dropping a shitload on rent.

      Oh yeah, landlords in Singapore are bastards. Unbiased of course and nothing to do with finding cockroaches in the place I move into over the weekend.

    8. Re:Work Visas by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      another benefit of living in Singapore is the they big brother government is so effective at stopping dissent and crime it is very peaceful for those who fit the model of a good citizen.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    9. Re:Work Visas by Trackster · · Score: 1

      Yep, exactly. Of course it means you take a pay cut. That's exactly what they point out in the writeup: Pay is low but housing, taxi rides to work and such are free.

    10. Re:Work Visas by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Yep, I remember my share (a few hundred) of cockroaches. We had to break all the cupboards out of our appartment to get rid of them. Not to forget the fight required to convince our landlord for getting that done. Don't remember shitloads of money for rent, it was more shitloads of cockroaches :-). But we fought ourselves out of that... Don't think that those folks in India, portraited in the article have it different. Lots of challenges, but in the end a great time. If you (not talking about citog!!) can't stand those challenges, better stay home for turkey. But you'll miss the curry...

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    11. Re:Work Visas by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      If you're so focussed on numbers, I'm not sure you understand "quality of living". Better listen to your wife, she seems more to 'get it'.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    12. Re:Work Visas by Desiderata · · Score: 1

      Living abroad really depends on what kind of contract you have. If you're employed as a local, you don't get many perks. But if you're an expat, your company probably pays rent AND employs special people to do all the visa paperwork for you. Singapore is expensive, and India can be (real estate, not food), depending on where you live.
      But the thing with expats in India is that they're being replaced by competent locals. There's no need to employ an expat and pay for benefits etc. if you can get someone local to do it for you. And housing can be really cheap overseas.

    13. Re:Work Visas by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Now you're contradicting yourself.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    14. Re:Work Visas by bheer · · Score: 1

      > some fairly respectable economists are starting to see only a 10% chance of avoiding a coming economic meltdown

      Stephen Roach is known in investment circles for being bearish. And one ecomist, even ignoring his reputation, != "some ... economists". This is not to say that he is wrong (and in his line of work it's useful since he can play an effective devil's advocate) since even the boy who cried wolf was right once, but that statement of yours was classic scaremongering.

      And oh, several respectable posters on Slashdot are starting to see that BSD is dying.

  2. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...so now I've got to listen to a European stoner when I call my bank :-(

    1. Re:Great... by Morphix84 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could be worse, could be tech support. Oh Wait....

    2. Re:Great... by frankvl · · Score: 1

      Yes, here in Europe, we're all stoned all the time, just like your countries' propaganda machine told you

  3. I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I've worked in the U.S., Japan, and now Germany. In a few years time, I hope to move to India to work for a little while, then head back to Australia to do what I can to build up the national market for technology ...

    Globalization is a reality, folks. You can either:

    a) pretend it doesn't exist,
    b) complain about it, or
    c) live in it, as a globalist individual

    I chose c). If big-corp's are gonna go multi-national, so am I. The days of stick-dwelling are over .. this is the Era Of The Nomad, in my opinion.

    Move or die.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:I'm Australian. by zx75 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely. I graduate from university in a couple of months and I'm already pursuing opportunities overseas as well as locally (Canada).

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:I'm Australian. by ilyaa1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. Globalization is here, and it is actually a really good thing for virtually everyone.

      There is plenty of reactionary opposition in virtually any "western" country around the world; same applies for the ex-USSR countries. It's likely that nothing can be done about those people; but when students pick up the same reactionary banners, I start to wonder...

      I, for one, am learning Chinese. Hopefully, me and my partnet are going there in a few years...

    3. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The problem with your theory is that while capital is free to move across borders, workers are not. Some countries have very strict immigration laws. If this was the Era of the Nomad then one billion Chinese would have already moved to America.

    4. Re:I'm Australian. by zzyzx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's great as long as you don't actually want to do anything other with your life other than work. Don't put down any roots or try to make friends or anything.

    5. Re:I'm Australian. by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming all countries will treat citizens (residents) fairly... I wouldn't be so quick to throw out ideas like state and culture so quickly. I'll make a prediction, this is the hight of globalism, the upcoming oil shortage (thanks China!!) will dominate the next years of conflict and struggle.

      Choose wisely is all I have to say.

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    6. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You forgot to list what all the actual countries are doing, which is

      d) increase the country's power through economics.

      This is what China is doing. This is what India is doing. Practically every country on Earth is doing this except for maybe Canada, who doesn't have to, and some smaller European countries. India is really in a competition against Pakistan to become the most advanced first, so they don't have to worry quite so much over their border. China is building up their knowledge base so that they can make a real run at controlling the East.

      You're playing at being a citizen in a global nation, but most everybody else is preparing for war.

    7. Re:I'm Australian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Globalization is a reality, folks. You can either:

      a) pretend it doesn't exist,
      b) complain about it, or
      c) live in it, as a globalist individual


      I too choose c).

      So very true. Even if you return to your local country later and get a nothing job your better off as you get to see the world and hone the skills along the way.

      I left, and a friend stayed. I came back in 9 years to find he has spent the last 4 years unemployed as his skills lapsed with the last employer. Other friends also did not fair much better.

      The best part is a sysadmin that knows C/C++/Java, the OS architecture and how to troubleshoot applications can get a job here. North American companies do not invest in their people and the result is if you want to get the experience you must go to get it.

    8. Re:I'm Australian. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about d) Realize it is there but deliberatly decide to not live my life according to economics.

      Sorry, but life is too short to have my life dictated by some politician/multi-national company.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    9. Re:I'm Australian. by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >Don't put down any roots or try to make friends or anything.

      My father has had us (as in all the family) trotting around the world since I was 3. Lybia, Italy, Venezuela, Colombia, Argentina, Brazil, and of course several parts of Spain.

      My parents seem to have developed a nice social life and don't seem to lack friends. As for a family, well, here I am (along with my siblings).

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    10. Re:I'm Australian. by mizhi · · Score: 1

      You're being a bit myopic.

      "Improving your skills and aggressively pursuing a better position" may mean you have to move to another country in order to continue to work for your company. If you work for a small company that doesn't do any international business, then you might be fine... until it moves overseas.

      Most large companies, on the other hand, have significant international presences and in order to advance you may have to be willing to move to a foreign country and work for a period of time.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    11. Re:I'm Australian. by Garbonzo+Pitts · · Score: 1

      OR

      d) Exercise the power we have in democracies, and stop it (at least our participation in the labor arbitrage aspect of it).

      I never cease to be amazed at people's fatalism and lack of imagination

    12. Re:I'm Australian. by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      I have moved cities once every 3 years since graduating high school 10 years ago. I travel a lot for my work now. I keep in contact with past friends over internet and phone. If you have to be in the same city as your friends to stay friends, well, I feel bad for you.

      It's a great vacation to go see my friends or meet them in other vacation destinations. I have some friends who I chat with daily online and have only met them in person the first time we met.

      It seems we have different ideas of what "roots" and "friendship" are, I just suppose mine are less superficial.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    13. Re:I'm Australian. by paulydavis · · Score: 1

      "deliberatly decide to not live my life according to economics"

      That is impossible by definition ... Do you have any idea what the "dismal" science is? It studies scarcity and resource allocation and other things... You giving up eating? The point is if you go live in a cave and forage for your food that is a economic choice.

    14. Re:I'm Australian. by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      I'm currently dating a woman who lives 1000 miles away from me. I'm active on many online communities. I understand how you can maintain friendships across distance.

      However I also have learned the difference between friendships that are net/phone based and those that in person based. It's much easier to let the former be friendships of convenience, ones where you don't have to sacrifice and drop out of them when things get rough. Also when you can't go out and see a show or have a drink with your friends, there is an important element missing.

      There is a difference between online friendships and real life ones and I prefer the latter.

    15. Re:I'm Australian. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I am meaning I'm not living my life according to some economic min/max game.

      If I do live in a cave, its going to be for reasons other than economic. Just as I won't live in India just so I can have a job.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    16. Re:I'm Australian. by teetam · · Score: 3, Informative
      I can understand your xenophobia, but most of your worries are irrelevant to India at least.

      In India, medical insurance is only needed for real emergencies. Most people don't have them because most don't need them. Unlike the US, India (and many other countries) have a "radical" approach to medical treatment: You get sick, you visit a doctor or hospital in your price range immediately and they treat you! I believe this approach is called free market or something like that.

      Labor laws in India are far stricter and biased towards workers than in the US (India used to be a full-fledged socialist country, remember).

      Religious freedom is guaranteed in India. It has been that way for millenia. India has the second highest Muslim population in the world and the highest Christian population in Asia! It is officially a "secular" country with no state religion.

      When you are apprehensive about a foreign country, it is a good idea to do some reading up about it.

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
    17. Re:I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Don't put down any roots or try to make friends or anything.

      Sorry, but rubbish. I have many very, very good friends, who are close to me, all over the world, an utterly diverse group. I stay in regular touch with them, and we frequently travel to exotic and interesting places together.

      Compared to burb-dweller homogoneity, I'll take International Lifestyle anytime.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    18. Re:I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 1


      Actually, option d) isn't an option, in my life, its a reality anyway.

      Every single place I've worked has improved my skills, and my salary is decent enough, believe me ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    19. Re:I'm Australian. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Fatalism? Democracy? Aren't they one and the same?

      Nationalist pride in 'systems' are irrelevant when multi-national corps can demolish an entire economic system in a moments bank-wire ..

      The New World Order is upon us. The only thing we can do about it is construct another one, right on top of it.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    20. Re:I'm Australian. by zx75 · · Score: 1

      I'm looking to do something similar for awhile, and the reason isn't economics. The reason is that I want to spend time in other countries and travel. My life is too short to spend at home until I'm too old to travel.

      I want to go abroad, work for awhile, see the world, and appreciate what it has to offer before I choose to settle down. I'm not living my life according to economics, although economics may determine the opportunities available to me and where I decide to go.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    21. Re:I'm Australian. by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Damn, and I think I might have just totally misinterpreted what you wrote. I wrote thinking that you were using 'slave to economics' as a reason not to travel... but I just realized that you might have been using it as a reason TO travel, at which point my above post makes absolutely no sence.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    22. Re:I'm Australian. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you still mis-understand my post.

      It is an offer for free, non-commital sex to any hot looking blond chicks with big honkers.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    23. Re:I'm Australian. by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      In those days, Globalism was called Internationaism. Modern propaganda today may belittle nationalism as being nothing more than flag waving, but the real issue was national economic sovereignty in the face of growing international financial power.

      AKA the "global Zionist conspiracy." I do remember the nationalism vs. internationalism fight. I also remember your side losing.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    24. Re:I'm Australian. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I used to travel quite a bit and made friends in a lot of different places. I still stay in touch with a lot of them, but it just really isn't the same. Being able to have an evening out with a friend is a lot more satisfying than just having pixels on a screen.

      For me, being able to talk to them on the phone is a little more "real" than online, but it still doesn't compare to being face to face.

      Yes, I still stay in touch with them, but there are times that I miss them a great deal even while we chat on im.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    25. Re:I'm Australian. by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      Unlike the US, India (and many other countries) have a "radical" approach to medical treatment: You get sick, you visit a doctor or hospital in your price range immediately and they treat you!

      Ah, yes. I'll have the K-Mart diagnosis, and the Sam's Club discounted surgery please -- to go -- I can't afford the inpatient stay. Just dump me in the alley after the operation. Certainly, U.S. health care has problems, but selecting your treatment based on your "price range" is flying in the face of you-get-what-you-pay-for.

    26. Re:I'm Australian. by Guillermito · · Score: 1

      You do realize WWII was primarily about this issue don't you. In those days, Globalism was called Internationaism. Modern propaganda today may belittle nationalism as being nothing more than flag waving, but the real issue was national economic sovereignty in the face of growing international financial power. Thus, you have forgotten a major part of Option B, you can fight to preserve your way of life.


      Exactly. And globalism won the war. The cold war that came after WW2 was fought in order to decide which kind of globalism would prevail. Both communism ("proletarians of the world unite") and capitalism ("capital should be allowed to move freely across borders") are internationalist ideologies. We know which party won that world too.

    27. Re:I'm Australian. by kraut · · Score: 1

      It's even better - you can have friends all over the world. Which is very nice indeed.

      Of course, it's not for everyone - I also have friends that have never really left the small town we grew up in; if that's what they want to do, let them do it. Personally I prefer to travel, and would love to work in yet another country for a couple of years.

      As for having kids, that would actually be one good reason for moving abroad: We'd be able to afford a full-time nanny. It only potentially becomes a problem once they get to school age, and even then there are plenty of good international schools these days. Although from what I hear a good Indian school is probably better than most European or American schools these days ;(

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    28. Re:I'm Australian. by kraut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Silly me, there was me thinking that WWII was about Germany and Japan aggressive empirebuilding, not to mention pursuing their racist policies.

      Time to rewrite those history books.

      As for
      >The people of India don't want you there, and they don't want to be part of your global vision. The same is true for practically every other non-European country in the eastern hemisphere.

      Funny, it always seems to me that most people want a western livestyle, a nice house, tv, fridge, car, internet access, and lots of money wherever I've travelled. Including India. Preserving local customs comes way behind clean water,

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    29. Re:I'm Australian. by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Who needs that?! We got slashdot.

    30. Re:I'm Australian. by tho+1234 · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with increasing power through economics? Why WOULDN'T a country want to increase the living standards for its people?

      The only country that's sacrificing their living standards, running up massive deficits, to prepare for war is the US.

      Only to a Neocon does economic growth = threat to the US that must be eliminated. Instead of improving living standards for its own people, they're willing to reduce their own standards as long as they can prevent anyone else from becoming catching up to them.

      Unfortunately, if there is a world war 3, it will be this aditude that causes it.

    31. Re:I'm Australian. by MacDork · · Score: 1
      ...not to mention pursuing their racist policies.

      Time to rewrite those history books.

      You're not kidding. America fought WWII in part because of racism? The same America that used the word nigger in newspapers regularly until around the 60's? The same America that exiled Japanese Americans to internment camps? What? There was no civil right's movement or Jim Crow laws? Ya don't say.

      We didn't have satellites feeding us realtime pictures of German concentration camps and mass graves back then. Most Americans didn't hear about the Holocaust until the war was mostly over. America fought WWII because the Japanese bombed the shit out of Pearl Harbor.

      Fought WWII over racism my eye. What shiny new history book fed you that tripe?

    32. Re:I'm Australian. by MacDork · · Score: 1
      Both communism ("proletarians of the world unite") and capitalism ("capital should be allowed to move freely across borders") are internationalist ideologies. We know which party won that world too.

      Yep, the Russians went bankrupt and America won.

    33. Re:I'm Australian. by servognome · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, you can move to follow the job you want, or accept a job where u are.
      This isn't too different than the issues people had in previous centuries in the US (and probably other countries). Jobs within the country moved to cheaper areas, or high growth areas were in less populated states. People would complain that they didn't want to move cities because they had roots in their hometown/state for X generations.
      Its much more acceptable now to change cities or states to accept a job, in the future I would suspect the same would be true of changing countries.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    34. Re:I'm Australian. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      America fought WWII because the Japanese bombed the shit out of Pearl Harbor.

      Let's not forget that the Japanese bombing wasn't just a random act of violence. American foreign policy in the far east was far from egalitarian. The American occupation of the Phillipines was brutal to say the least, and officially justified due to the so-called inferiority of the filipino people.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    35. Re:I'm Australian. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Silly me, there was me thinking that WWII was about Germany and Japan aggressive empirebuilding, not to mention pursuing their racist policies.

      It is rather silly. I mean, Germany was the size of Texas when WWII started. Great Britain declared war on Germany for retaking parts of its coutnry seized after WWI. Millions of Germans lived in this regions.

      At the same time, Great Britain controlled 1/3 of the entire planet, with garrisons in dozens of countries.

      Who was building the empire? By what right did Great Britain get to decide who could build an empire and who could not?

      I am sorry, but your post reeks of indoctrination. WWII had absolutely nothing to do with Germany building an empire, absolutely nothing. To think otherwise is foolish and ignorant of the obvious facts of the day.

      Your racism theory is also quite wrong, as another poster mentioned. Germany had hundreds of thousands of volunteers from non-European countries like India, Persia, and even places like Tibet, far more than the British and Americans combined. Then of course there is the obvious: Germany's strongest ally was Japan! If racism was their goal, I don't think they would have worked so closely with a people they considered inferior by default.

      American propaganda during WWII clearly painted the war as a racial struggle, demonizing the Japanese as vicious animals.

      Dig deeper. Look at how WWII began at the end of the Great Depression. The world was in turmoil at the time, and it had nothing to do with building empires or racism.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    36. Re:I'm Australian. by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1
      Who was building the empire? By what right did Great Britain get to decide who could build an empire and who could not?
      Germany was. Or rather rebuilding an empire - their previous one having been taken away from them in the prior bout of great power nonsense they got involved with. Britain (and France) already had empires and by the 30s they weren't in the market for new colonial posessions. Great Britain's right to dispose of affairs in the concert of nations is the same one that the US has now, they were the bigger and badder than anyone who might have been inclined to object.

      Your racism theory is also quite wrong, as another poster mentioned. Germany had hundreds of thousands of volunteers from non-European countries like India, Persia, and even places like Tibet, far more than the British and Americans combined.
      Ummmm no. Non-European combatants on the allied side far outstripped the pathetic fragments Germany mustered. Himmler managed to scrape together what, one SS regiment of Indians? The Commonwealth had more Nepalis under arms than that... part of an entire *army* from the subcontinent, plus significant formations recruited from elsewhere in Asia, Africa and the Caribbean. Same goes for France (SE Asia and North Africa) and the US (chiefly Filippinos).

      Then of course there is the obvious: Germany's strongest ally was Japan! If racism was their goal, I don't think they would have worked so closely with a people they considered inferior by default.
      Racisms come in many flavours and are culturally determined. The Nazis particular thing was mostly focused on Jews, Slavs and Gypsies (with a side helping of anti-black African prejudice but then pretty much everyone who is racist has it in for Africans, even other Africans) - strange to tell these were precisely the three ethnic 'others' that most Germans would have encountered with any kind of frequency in the first part of the C20th, so its entirely predictable that a political movement with race at the centre of its ideology would fixate upon them. I'm not sure where in the contorted hierarchy of Nazi racial theory the Japanese fell but they were sufficiently high up the totem pole (and more importantly, didn't pose any kind of geopolitical threat to the regime) that their non-Aryanness could be overlooked at least for the duration (all bets would have been off if the Axis had managed to win WW2 IMO). All this demonstrates however, is that Nazi racism was contingent, contradictory and that even the senior figures of the regime understood "my enemy's enemy is my friend".

      Racism may well have had little to do with why the allies decided to go to the mattresses in WW2, but that doesn't mean that Nazi Germany wasn't a vicious racist dictatorship or that its viciousness and its racism (the one following from the other for the most part) weren't powerful factors in mobilising and cementing the alliance against the Axis once a war policy had been decided upon. So your argument that the racism of the Nazi regime had nothing to do with the causes of WW2 is a peverse misreading of history.

      Regards
      Luke
      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    37. Re:I'm Australian. by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      India used to be a full-fledged socialist country, remember

      No it wasn't.

      India leaned towards Russia, and had a middle-road-economy, a combination of public and private sectors - that is hardly socialist.

  4. Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Recently heard in downtown Mumbai: "Those damn foreigners are taking our jobs!!"

    --
    Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    1. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by theundead · · Score: 1

      Ha, thats one thing you wouldn't hear for a long time. I am not saying Indian are absoulutely nice and tolerant or anything, but realistically, the chances of a large number of Westeners moving to India for work is remote because of obvious reasons - the money earner in India wouldn't go too far back in the West
      - the amout of Indian engineers looking for work, and will be looking for work in coming years will keep the salaries down for a good few years.

      Well, good to see new faces anyway, I welcome you all to Incredible India! :)

    2. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by maniac_inside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what you make a hell of a sense, what I reckon is that if even say 1000 indians realize that they have lost job, you won't be surprised that Indian govt. will pass a regulation banning such intakes.

      I remember some time back there were riots in india when migrant labour from other states{within india only} had started to come into Bihar. Many were killed.

      So I just hope these european guys know what they are getting into.

    3. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      When a group of foreign students came out of Dallas airport, one of them exclaimed: "Look at this! There are so many foreigners here" :)

      I use to escort people at SeaTac airport sometime in the 1980s, mostly people in transit to Canada without visas for America (TWoV). Other countries' airports have international areas for people just going through were SeaTac does not so these people just get an escort. But from students from the Far East, they did comment on how it was different then they expected in the fact that everyone didn't have blond hair and blue eyes. I explained in simple terms that America's population is mixed and this city was 70% caucasian and about 30% something else.

      So yea, I could see someone coming to America and be surprised at the number of foreigners, or rather people with non-european roots.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:Recently heard in downtown Mumbai by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      That's Bangalore. Go to Mumbai and say that.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  5. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You are so wrong. I work as a manager in a "cheaper" country of "unskilled monkeys" who are actually well trained, speak several languages fluently, work normal hours, develop IP instead of just taking outsourced work, win international awards for interesting products (two so far) and in no way do the "button pushing" you refer to. Frankly anyone who thinks like you is in for a big big shock in the next ten years.

  6. Where do i sign up? by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where do i sign up? Last summer I was looking for a consulting position to liason between India and the States. No luck, and I'm sure the biggest part of my flopped idea was not reaching the right people in India - I went through Monster.com's listings for positions in India. Any suggestions on how I would reach organizations looking for ppl who would be willing to travel between the two countries?

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
    1. Re:Where do i sign up? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I hear American Airlines have a great daily service.
      You could become a trolley dolly!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Where do i sign up? by xmpcray · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out these other big Indian Job sites-

      http://www.naukri.com/
      http://www.timesjobs.com/
      http://www.jobsahead.com/

      --

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer.
  7. Good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they'll drive salaries up over there and they'll be forced to outsource the jobs to the U.S.

  8. Not necessarily. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's terribly biased, perhaps even racist to think that someone is unskilled just because he hails from a country like india.

    IMO outsourcing is itself a marriage between the very technology that tech-jobs produce, and capitalist drive for maximum profits at minimum expense. The Internet has made telecommuting feasible, even across continents and as a result we end up with a rather unbalanced situation.

    If anything, perhaps outsourcing will help the global economy attain a little bit more homogenity.

  9. Re:A Shame by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    more jobs will be retained in the west for skilled personnel.

    Like doctors, lawyers, radiologists, etc. all of whom are being outsourced as fast as middle management can complete the paperwork.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  10. Hippes by GuyZero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It just seems like a bunch of 20-something "kids" who are backpacking around the world and trying to stay solvent. It hardly seems any different from the fact that every youth hostel I stayed in during a brief trip to Australia was also staffed (nearly 100%) with non-Australians. Oddly, there was fairly little outcry about the loss of hostel-desk-clerk-jobs to those damn Europeans.

    I doubt they're making a huge dent in the overall world of outsourcing. Here in Canada more than 10% of the company where I work is people from outside of Canada, but that's not considered odd. Why would it be considered odd for there to be foreigners working in India? There's probably a lot going for those Indian cities. And has anyone ever eaten out in Switzerland? The food alone would motivate me to leave the country. I like cheese, sure, but come on - a whole meal consisting of cheese? No wonder all those Swiss kids are going to India.

    1. Re:Hippes by 10seconds · · Score: 1

      And has anyone ever eaten out in Switzerland? The food alone would motivate me to leave the country. I like cheese, sure, but come on - a whole meal consisting of cheese? No wonder all those Swiss kids are going to India.

      This is off-topic but... You don't now what you are talking about regarding the food. There is excellent food in Switzerland, being a country right in the middle of French and Italian influence, in particular. Also, places like Geneva are extremely cosmopolitan and you see all sorts of international cuisine there.

      As for the cheese fondue... You like it or not, but it's not like you have to eat it everyday.

      I suspect the German-speaking part of Switzerland is less interested in what other people call good food, but give a chance to the French- and Italian-speaking areas ;-)

  11. Expatriates, this is nothing new by ites · · Score: 5, Interesting

    True story:

    A friend of mine, a Rwandese educated at Harvard, worked for a US legal firm. One day he was asked to go on a long-term mission to Nigeria for an oil firm client. He balked, quoting Nigeria's reputation for danger. He was offered a nice bonus, travel costs, and so he went. When I visited him in Lagos, he had installed himself in a nice house, with a cook, driver, security guards. He played golf twice a week, spent the weekends at the beach, and too many evenings at the clubs in Victoria Island.

    Every few months he would return to head office, and make a report. His report would inevitably end with remarks about the insecurity in Lagos, the need for constant armed protection, the power cuts and the lack of facilities. Since his work was bringing in lots of money, his firm inevitably gave him a pay rise and extended his mission.

    Expatriates tend to suffer from diseases of luxury. They don't pay taxes, their savings go 10-100 times further, they get privileged positions, and if good, they are valued for their expertise and cultural baggage.

    The only problem: they tend to die divorced and alcoholic. Decadence is too cheap in some places!

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by westlake · · Score: 1
      The only problem: they tend to die divorced and alcoholic.

      There is another. The airlift out when everything turns sour and your bodyguards have fled.

    2. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      "Expatriates tend to suffer from diseases of luxury. They don't pay taxes, their savings go 10-100 times further, they get privileged positions, and if good, they are valued for their expertise and cultural baggage."

      Uh... that's funny. I've American and have been living in Germany for two years now and the German government seems to think I should pay them taxes. My savings also do not go 10-100 times further. Nor do I have a priveleged position.

      Maybe you're not clear on the definition of expatriate?

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    3. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by ites · · Score: 1

      Here's how I see it:

      Expatriate = rich person living in poor country.

      Immigrant = poor person living in rich country.

      Foreigner = person living in country matching their own standard of living.

      An American coming to work in Europe would be an expatriate for 1-2 years (until their tax free status ran out), and then becomes a simple foreigner.

      Hey, I _know_ an expat when I see one. In Brussels, they're the people paying 4-6 times the normal rate for appartments.

      Actually, with the sliding US Dollar, I hope you're paid in Euro or you risk becoming an immigrant!

      The story was, anyhow, about India. Thusly the context for the word "expatriate". Gin and tonics and polo, old chap.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    4. Re:Expatriates, this is nothing new by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      What on earth are you talking about with this tax-free status? I am American living in Germany and I have to pay taxes.

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  12. Re:A Shame by chameleon3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We've been trying to outsource lawyers for ages. No one else wants 'em.

  13. Needs some codification by Sai+Babu · · Score: 4, Interesting



    I've sugested on /. before that international trade agreements might benefit from some sort of reciprocity in work visas. For example if 20,000 Indian workers are allowed into to USA then an equal number of USA citizens should be allowed to work in India.

    I for one could go for a summerhouse in Kashmir.

    As the article points out, raw salary isn't everything.

    1. Re:Needs some codification by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because its not like two nuke-club members are fighting over Kashmir, or anything. Pretty vistas, sure, but the chance of one day seeing a sunrise way off schedule and shifted deep into the gamma spectrum just kinda kills it for me.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:Needs some codification by XopherMV · · Score: 1

      That only makes sense if they pay the same amount in India that they pay here. Unfortunately, we all know that isn't the case.

    3. Re:Needs some codification by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

      No. Pay parity doesn't make sense. If one is willing to work for the same wage as an equally qualified local, reciprocity of work visa's makes sense. I'm not saying borders should be open, but if a guy from Hong Kong can get a job in USA cooking Hong Kong style, some bubba who might want to cook BBQ in HK should be able to apply for a reciprocal work visa slot. Hell, a good BBQ restaurant in HK might pay better than one in rural USA.

  14. Re:No Way by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    How is it different now?

    (I am in Canada, and I see no difference except that it's impossible to live on $10/month, so the salaries are higher.)

  15. I'd go.. by LilGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll go whereever there's work. I can't seem to get a break around here (houston), so I'm ready to go anywhere I can get a piece of the pie. As of late I've been wanting to get out of the US anyways, not soley due to the election.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  16. I would move in a heartbeat by Diclophis · · Score: 1

    Seriously... here is my resume

  17. South-Eash Asian recruitment of Westerners by Gernot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I read Symbiosis on a stop-by at Kuala Lumpur Airport, see http://www.symbiosisonline.com/, I got the feeling that the Technology Park in KL is trying to attract Western Engineers by providing them with a luxurious working environment in regard to comfort, personal care and resources, even if the payment probably is mediocre.
    If I had to choose between a stressful job/high payment and an offer from there, I could still easily be tempted to go to Malaysia :-) See also http://www.tpm.com.my/ .

  18. Globalization by deft · · Score: 4, Funny

    If each country is going to be good at something in the global market, and everyone is carving out their niche, I say let India be the land of cubicles and tech support. More power to em.

    I also would like to make a call now to solidify our position as the world leader in strippers.

    Government Subsidize Gold Poles NOW!

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:Globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry, Canada has already taken the position of world leader in exotic dancers.
      http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/A rticleNews /TPStory/LAC/20041123/STRIPPER23/TPNational/Canada

  19. Re:A Shame by GuyZero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Radiologists are getting outsourced because x-ray machines produce shitty images and there simply aren't enough radiologists being trained to meet demands in the US & Canada.

    Invent a better x-ray machine and you could put radiologists out of business faster than you could break a leg.

    Notice how dedicated radio operators have gone the way of the dodo? Telephone operators? People who add up bills manually? Some day radiologists will be in the same bucket as buggy whip manufacturers.

  20. This might work for europeans by typedef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments. This means that when these people quit working they'll have

    -Free healthcare
    -It won't be nearly as expensive (in most cases) for their children to attend university in europe
    -In some countries, they'll be given a pension to live off of when they retire

    In the U.S., things are a bit different. You have a retirement fund that you need to plug money into. You need to save for your kid's college education. You need health insurance. Now, you might be able to live quite well in India if work there, but the salary that you get is so small compared to what you recieve if you worked in the U.S., that you really won't be able to provide money for any of these things. I dunno, it might be a good experience for a couple of years, but as an American, I wouldn't plan on sticking around if I did it.

    1. Re:This might work for europeans by mslinux · · Score: 1

      Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments.

      Historically, this is true. The reality today is that these systems are collapsing under their own weight... much like the US social security system will eventually. The moral of this is that individuals are going to have to start looking after themselves one day.

      I don't understand all this talk about moving to another country. They're in the same boat as everyone else. Start your own consulting business or switch careers. Take care of yourself, don't rely on a company or government to do it for you... if you do, you'll be sorely disappointed someday.

    2. Re:This might work for europeans by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments. This means that when these people quit working they'll have

      -Free healthcare


      Nothing in this world is free. To get "free" healthcare in France, the individual pays 25% of his salary to social security. Think that's not too bad? The employer portion is 50%, and if you're self employed you eat the entire thing. Right off the top, 75% of your salary is gone to pay for healthcare and retirement.

      -It won't be nearly as expensive (in most cases) for their children to attend university in europe

      Again, universities are subsidized by the state and are subject to their rules. In the US, anybody with an IQ over room temperature can spend the money and head off to college, maybe not Harvard, but there are any number of good, local schools that will take you if you can tie your shoes and answer a true/false question correctly within 3 tries. University in France is for the achievers and you only get one chance to get in. As one who started out in the trades, and found my way to college in my early twenties, I'm damn grateful for the American system, as I'd still be a mechanic, making a third of what I'm taking in with way worse work conditions. Even if you're one of those who went straight from high school to college to professional work at 22, it's nice to have the option at 30 or 40 to quit, go back to school, and do something else if you want.

      -In some countries, they'll be given a pension to live off of when they retire

      In the U.S., things are a bit different. You have a retirement fund that you need to plug money into

      And where do you think the money you're "given" comes from? See my response to your first point about confiscatory tax rates. I'd much rather sock 15% a year into my 401k and know where it is than fork over 75% and hope the government will give part of it back.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    3. Re:This might work for europeans by MQBS · · Score: 1

      It also all depends on the kind of life you want to lead. You can live quite comfortably before thirty without a family anywhere in the world as long as you're not a whiny or exsessively spoiled. The trick is to not have kids to pay for college for or a strong consumer drive to buy all of the latest things new. Even if you only bought half of your stuff secondhand and didn't cook absolutely every night you could live quite comfortably on a small wage almost anywhere.

      --
      The dream reveals the reality which conception lags behind. That is the horror of life- the terror of art. -Franz Kafka
    4. Re:This might work for europeans by typedef · · Score: 1

      So fucking what? I wasn't comparing the two systems and implying that the European system is better, I was simply stating that it will be easier for Europeans to pull something like this off.

      In any event, I doubt that Europeans working abroad are going to be paying those "confiscatory tax rates" that you keep talking about, anyway, so it just works out that much better for them.

    5. Re:This might work for europeans by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      Most european countries have substantial socialist components to thier governments. This means that when these people quit working they'll have..
      ... not a great deal. We in the Netherlands pay only partly towards our own pension; the rest of the payments are premiums for a state pension. These premiums are to pay for the people who are retiring now, so they're spent immediately rather than saved up. You can see the problem here (everyone can except the politicians): the babyboomer generation is about to retire en masse, and the system is about to explode because the collected premiums do not nearly cover the pensions paid out. Young people can look forward to paying double pension premiums, and since there is no guarantee whatsoever the pension scheme will exist when they retire themselves, I advise them to do what I do and start saving for their own old age. So yes, I am paying triple.

      That is what socialism brings you. Beware.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:This might work for europeans by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      So fucking what? I wasn't comparing the two systems and implying that the European system is better, I was simply stating that it will be easier for Europeans to pull something like this off.

      It sure sounded like fawning over all the "free" stuff the Euro's get. Just so you're aware that there is no free lunch... In any event, I doubt that Europeans working abroad are going to be paying those "confiscatory tax rates" that you keep talking about, anyway, so it just works out that much better for them.

      Again, France is the only other one I know first hand, but they are still subject to French taxation when working out of the country, just like we were subject to US taxes when living as ex-pats...

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    7. Re:This might work for europeans by typedef · · Score: 1

      It sure sounded like fawning over all the "free" stuff the Euro's get. Just so you're aware that there is no free lunch...

      It wasn't, and I am. I'm afraid that you're just suffering from the all too common Reactionary Conservative Syndrome.

      Again, France is the only other one I know first hand, but they are still subject to French taxation when working out of the country, just like we were subject to US taxes when living as ex-pats...

      If you're working abroad you only need to pay US taxes if you make the equivalent of > $70,000 USD a year. I believe France and most other European countries have a simmilar system in place. If you're working in India for an Indian company, you are definatley not making that much money.

  21. Real Wage by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

    "The salaries are mediocre..."

    But, more importantly, taxes are even lower. Most western "welfare states" or nations in general have marginal tax rates of 40% or higher. In Denmark (where I live), the marginal tax (before sales taxes) is 62%.

    Gross wage is one thing, wage after the taxman has been in your paycheque is another thing entirely.

    I'm not in the least surprised to hear that people are moving to India. The neverending meddling in our personal lives and property because of the state is just too much.

    1. Re:Real Wage by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      2004 U.S. Federal marginal tax rates.

    2. Re:Real Wage by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I have no mod points - sorry.

      Do the states levy their own income taxes or do they subsist on property taxes, sales taxes and the like? I imagine some would and some won't. For those that do, how much would be representative?

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    3. Re:Real Wage by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Add to the income tax the following:
      12.4% tax for social security and 2.9% Medicare levy (up to some limit - $80,000 ?? of gross income)
      state income tax (perhaps 0% - 10% ?? depending on the state)
      property tax (rate varies widely)
      sales tax (perhaps 0% - 10% ?? depending on the state)

      You can do a google search and see the income and sales tax rates in each state. This might interest you. (I did not read it carefully but it objects to the shift in taxes during recent years from the rich to the poor.)

    4. Re:Real Wage by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      Corresponding numbers for the UK:
      Income tax is progressive in 4 bands:

      0% first £4,745
      10% the next £1,960
      22% £1,961-30,500
      40% >£31,001

      Then add:

      11% for 'National Insurance' the notional levy that funds healthcare, pensions and unemployment payouts (up to a max income of ~£30,000, then down to 1% beyond that level).

      Local property taxes - also highly variable. I paid about £1100 this year for a small place (hence cheaper) in London (hence expensive).

      Sales taxes (actually VAT) of 17.5% - not on 'essentials' such as groceries which are zero-rated, but this is an ouch and often folded into posted prices, so less obvious than the equivalent imposts in the US.

      There are lots of one-off duties and charges squirrelled away in various bits of the economy of course (sin taxes are popular over here, which includes gasoline these days) but the above are the headline items.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
  22. walkabouts by peter303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aussies commonly take a year or two travel vacations during their lives. The popular ages are just after school and when the kids are gone.
    Amerians are so hard up about working and consuming they miss the important things in life.

    1. Re:walkabouts by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      Amerians are so hard up about working and consuming they miss the important things in life.

      Life can be a bit more complicated than just Americans or silly, or what not. In America, you have little vacation time, small pensions/retirements, and living is expensive. Student loans, mortgages, consumer debt, etc. can make taking a year or two off impossible.

    2. Re:walkabouts by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      What you mean to say is that they usually spend a year or two living a dozen per one-bedroom apt, being paid next to nothing, and permanently rendering the East End of London vomit-smelling.

    3. Re:walkabouts by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      As opposed to British backpackers who spend a year or two living in cramped, illegal backpackers hostels in Sydney, being paid next to nothing and permanently wallpapering Bondi with vomit and urine.

      Then they outstay their visas by a few years and head home leaving a string of illegitimate children in their wake.

      The phenomonon of "backpackers" "gap year yobbos" is not only found in London (although Upton Park and Craven Cottage are beginning to be seen as "home ground" stadiums for Australia).


      Damn, those English are hardcore

  23. Re:A Shame by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    Radiologists are getting outsourced because x-ray machines produce shitty images and there simply aren't enough radiologists being trained to meet demands in the US & Canada.

    There's no point in going to school for years if your job is going to be shipped blue-label to elsewhere. But that's okay, because we'll have 40,000% profits next quarter!

    Oh, we have a nine-figure trade deficit? Ahh, what do those economists know? Probably paying them too much too.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  24. US, Japan and Germany. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great..... And you could have done that back in the 80's, too. I'm talking the 1880's.

    What you're talking about is NOT "Globalization". You've only been hitting the 1st world countries.

    Globalization is about exploiting the 3rd world countries. Go and live there for a few years and see if your attitude doesn't change.

    1. Re:US, Japan and Germany. by torpor · · Score: 1

      What I'm talking about is the globalist point of view, not your knee-jerk reactionary tinfoil version.

      Thinking globally; changing from an introverted to extroverted view, is globalization.

      As for 'exploiting 3rd world countries', as soon as I'm done exploiting the so-called '1st World' ones, you can bet your ass I'll be off to Timbuktu to help them put new tech to use.

      And I've -travelled-, not lived, in far more places than just the 4 I've mentioned ... I know parts of the world most couldn't find on a map .. so I resent your assumption that my 'attitude needs changing' ... its the root-seeders that need an attitude change, especially them white-picket-fence ones!!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:US, Japan and Germany. by kraut · · Score: 1

      Globalisation is about free trade, which actually benefits the 3rd world countries tremendously. Generally much more so if they are democratic, but that is a separate issue.

      One of the things that's really keeping the 3rd world down is the subsidy culture of the EU and the US. There's simply no way a 3rd world farmer can compete with, e.g., subsidised European sugar on the world market.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  25. I dont think this is a trend by roxtar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article talks about very few foreigners coming to India and taking up jobs in call centres. Just one or two isolated incidents really dont show that people from europe are actually migrating to India. Also call centres dont offer too high pays as compared to the Indian IT companies and the work experience gained is also of little value. Also one doesnt know for how much time call centres will be around in India, so they are really thought of as temporary sources of income which mainly students use as a source of pocket money.

    1. Re:I dont think this is a trend by dajak · · Score: 1

      Europeans have been taking jobs in the rest of the world for decades. It is a good way to start a career with a multinational company. Americans also take jobs in Europe (and some other America-friendly countries).

      If you trade with Europe or America, it is good to employ some locals from those places. If you do business in India, you send over some people.

      Have total numbers changed or is the migration flow simply moving to India from other places?

  26. Somethings not quite right... by segfault_0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they are coming here and taking our jobs and we are going there and taking theirs... why dont we just work in our own countries. Article doesnt make any sense or would more aptly be titled "Westerners who like to travel take temporary jobs while wandering." rather than reverse immigration.

    --

    I was crazy back when being crazy really meant something. (Charles Manson)
    1. Re:Somethings not quite right... by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

      Says something about our respective countries, doesn't it? (I'm soon-to-be-back-home Indian)

  27. Illegal workers by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I suspect that the Indian government will start limiting this type of worker, because it impact on jobs for Indians.

    In Mexico (from my understanding), a foreigner must have a permit to work there. This is really ironic because Fox is pushing for more illegal workers in the USA.

    1. Re:Illegal workers by dfiguero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He is not pushing for more illegal workers... He's just trying to get them to be treated as human beings.

      As you might now southern U.S. states are very mexican-unfriendly even when a U.S. company sponsors a mexican or if a mexican wants to go shopping to the U.S. you get stupid comments by immigration people like: 'how's the crop this year?'

      It just shows that no matter where you are from education means everything.

      --
      My penguin ate my sig
    2. Re:Illegal workers by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
      He is not pushing for more illegal workers... He's just trying to get them to be treated as human beings.

      Huh? Lets see, they don't enforce the laws to require employers to check if the employee is legal. They offer amnestly to people who broke the law and was able to sneak across the border. When there was talk of amnesty last year, the number of attempted border crossings increased by about 50%. If there is a "guest worker" program, it should be required that they come across legally -- if they are here illegally, they are forever banned from using this program. I have gone through the process of getting a K-1 visa for my wife, so that I could bring her here -- LEGALLY!. Why should the people who went through the effort to follow all the rules, come here legally, have someone sign a document that prevents the immigrant from becoming a public charge, be slapped in the face by a program that says, "you broke the rules, ok -- it does not matter."
  28. The company by Sai+Babu · · Score: 4, Informative



    Even if 'the company' is supposed to take care of your visa, it pays to follow up on your own. This advice courtesy the guy who left Ecuador at the unpleasant end of a gun because the company he was working for FUCKED UP!.

    In addition to Ecuador, I've worked in China, Japan, Phillipines, Fiji, Tonga, Hong Kong, and Singapore. I hired on outside the USA. Most friends who are working or have worked expat. have hired on outside their home country.

    Want an overseas job, take a vacation, get to know the place, visit the company you want to work for. Hang out in the right bars.

    1. Re:The company by Viceice · · Score: 1

      ...Hang out in the right bars...

      Unless you're working in Saudi Arabia, in which case stay home and avoid alcohol related establishments like the plague.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    2. Re:The company by citog · · Score: 1

      Go to embassy parties if you want a drink. However, Saudi is still a shit hole so plague avoidance arguments still hold true.

  29. getting outsourced.. by Cederic · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The large corporation I work for is currently outsourcing all UK development to India.

    One interesting facet is that people whose roles are being relocated to India have the option of joining the Indian company involved. Their role would still be in India, and so they would be based there, but they would keep their UK salary.

    We're all currently discussing:
    - how good your standard of living would be in India on a UK salary
    - how long it would take for the Indian company to make you redundant (currently guess: 4 hours)
    - what the Indian employment laws are like

    All good fun,
    ~Cederic

    1. Re:getting outsourced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wouldn't be AXA by any chance? I just went to a recruitment day for them and I decided against it because I got the distinct impression that they were hiring project managers who would be put in charge of moving jobs to India.

    2. Re:getting outsourced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We're all currently discussing:
      - how good your standard of living would be in India on a UK salary
      - how long it would take for the Indian company to make you redundant (currently guess: 4 hours)
      - what the Indian employment laws are like.


      I am not in the UK but I would take this offer seriously. You could stay and look for a job right now but a UK salary in India would go along way and so what if it lasts 6 months or a year?

      The worst thing that will happen is you get to see India first hand and become worldly and not miopic.

      Say sure as long as you get a return ticket.

    3. Re:getting outsourced.. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Unless your company is setting you up to be screwed, you will be fine...

      Thats like saying "You will be ok, unless you aren't."

      >Indian Employment laws exist for someone who earns $0.02 per hour.

      And why don't Indian Employement laws protect someone from even being paid $40 a year?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:getting outsourced.. by Maul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me get this straight? The company is outsourcing to India to save money, but is allowing everyone to move to India and continue at the same salary?

      Something definately does not sound right.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    5. Re:getting outsourced.. by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight? The company is outsourcing to India to save money, but is allowing everyone to move to India and continue at the same salary?

      Until they've trained Indians, then they'll be let go. Otherwise no, it doesn't make sense.

    6. Re:getting outsourced.. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      IAAIndian, so here's my two paise's worth:
      - how good your standard of living would be in India on a UK salary
      One hypenated word: sky-high.

      Your Indian co-workers (or subordinates) would probably think that you live in a different world altogether. This not counting public amenities like clogged roads/pollution/cramped airports and stuff though.

      how long it would take for the Indian company to make you redundant (currently guess: 4 hours)
      As I posted earlier, if it's plain code-grunt work, then yes. But if it is managerial, or techno-managerial, work, then perhaps not; that Indian company will probably need you more than you need them.
      what the Indian employment laws are like
      Depends on what you're looking at, really. Let's just say this for now:- you probably know that the Indian economy is in 'reform' mode? Well, one of the places that our reform-minded policymakers needs work is labour laws; apparently, it's currently too stifling for companies.

      Which, of course, is not to say that labour laws are necessarily good; like I said, really depends on what you're looking at.

      A word of advice though (and I say this not as an Indian but as a migrant worker who's worked in three different countries): if you're venturing out of home, always leave with a return ticket in hand. If shit really hits the ceiling, you know you can always return and start afresh among your people. Also remember that any new cultural experience will change you in many ways; whether you consider it to be enriching or punishing is something you'd have to decide for yourself.

    7. Re:getting outsourced.. by Cederic · · Score: 1


      I suspect it's due to UK labour laws - it's certainly not possible to make someone redundant if their role still exists; it could be argued that the role does still exist, and so they must be allowed to continue in it.

      It just happens that the role is now in India not in the UK.

      Since handover to the Indian company will occur prior to the role transferral there's no incentive for the Indian's to retain the current UK staff, so they'll probably make it very very attractive to take a redundancy package (based on the "Substantial change to role" caused by the change in location)

      I'm happy to admit, I'm not fully au fait with the legalities, I'm just amused by the concept. Personally my role isn't one of those going (I'm merely at risk from our 25% headcount reduction which is also happening at the same time) so it's pretty academic for me.

      ~Cederic

  30. Big difference in the results. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a "work visa". Not citizenship.

    The kids going over there are working for a salary and, eventually, will be sent back to their home country. It's easy to explain with two examples.

    #1. Euro-kid goes to India and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage (1/10th what he'd make back home). He banks it all and lives on cheap rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he goes home with $X (or whatever his currency is). $X is 1/10 that he'd make in 2 years at home under the same conditions.

    #2. Indian guy goes to the US and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage for a US job (still 10x what he'd make back home). Banks it all, eats rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he, goes home. He now has 10x the money he'd have after 2 years of working in India.

    The effective difference is 100x between the two.

    Work visas are only good for making money in a wealthy country and then going home to a poor country. They suck for working in a poor country and then going home to a wealthy country.

    1. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah that really doesn't make a lot of sense for say a US citizen to go work in India. You could make more money in the long run by taking a $15/hr job in the US doing whatever (and with such low wages you don't have to pay tax, or perhaps only very little). Really I don't see the point of what these guys are doing, unless they plan on staying in India forever. Even going there for job experience is worthless since you can instead work for a small company (which typically pays smaller salary) in the US and get the same experience. Makes no sense at all. *shrug*

    2. Re:Big difference in the results. by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      #1. Euro-kid goes to India and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage (1/10th what he'd make back home). He banks it all and lives on cheap rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he goes home with $X (or whatever his currency is). $X is 1/10 that he'd make in 2 years at home under the same conditions.

      The real payoff is two years of living in India, supplementing your salary with a little savings or checks from Daddy that go a long way in Bangalore, having fun, being a bit of a bigshot, partying and putting something on your resume that will pay long-term dividends when you get back. (And, say, apply for a job supervising an outsourced project.)

      It's something you do for fun, not because it necessarily makes financial sense.

      (Apply same point to the initial BBC story and /. submission...)

    3. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're over-simplifying it. Differences in tax rates and cost of living could sway that considerably. Plus with bonuses like the free housing and free ride to work you'd be saving a lot more of your earnings.

    4. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, but having constant diarrhea and eating shitty food is not my idea of fun. Also, Indian chicks don't put out (unless you marry them), which makes matters worse. Then there's the rampant polution and health hazards. India is not a fun place to live no matter how you slice it. Trust me, I am an Indian, and I've visited India enough times to know this.

      BTW, in India, diarrhea is so common, it is normal for you to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea"

      --
      #!/
    5. Re:Big difference in the results. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >go a long way in Bangalore, having fun, being a bit of a bigshot, partying

      I can't see India being some big party place with women with loose morals.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    6. Re:Big difference in the results. by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't see India being some big party place with women with loose morals.

      From which we can deduce you've never been to India.

      Where life is cheap, hard and poor, but there are also the fabulously wealthy, is always a big party place with women with loose morals.

      If you don't believe me you can test this hypothesis without ever leaving the good ol' US of A.

      Just visit Detroit.

      KFG

    7. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quality of life != salary.

      Examples:

      Netherlands salaries are 10-20% less than US. But they get 30+ days of vacation. That comes out to 10-20% extra pay. Which one would you have 80+ hrs of EA weeks or 30+ hours of workweek after removing the vacation time?

      In India you can get a maid who cooks, cleans for rupies a week. Even when you make 10% of your Western salary you can afford it. The food is much cheaper in India, especially if you compare restaurants to restaurants. In other words you will not need to cook at all.

      Learning tolarenace is a gigantic value for your society, by being exposed (not as a tourist, but as a working member) to several different cultures is invaluable.

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    8. Re:Big difference in the results. by klevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a heck of a lot more to "partying" than getting drunk and having sex with whomever is at hand. That tends to get old real fast (and so does anyone who lives that way for an extended period of time).

    9. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an interesting side note the two most efficient economies in terms of GDP per worker per hour are Germany and France. The USA makes more GDP in total per worker, but the workers tend to work much longer hours. As to which is better (the difference is about 15 hours per week and about a month of holiday time) I wouldn't like to say.

      In terms of GDP (PPP) the French and Germans (and most north Western European nations) make around 70% of what a US worker does in terms of mean GDP (PPP) per capita. What the median values are is another matter, of course, but are likely to be relatively close to the mean I would imagine.

    10. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But they get 30+ days of vacation

      I work in the UK and get 31 days of holiday time, plus 8 bank holidays, for a total of 39 days. However British workers tend to work longer hours than those on the continent.

    11. Re:Big difference in the results. by Afty0r · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let's compare this with what could happen for a kid from a Western European island like the UK...
      #1. Euro-kid goes to India and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage (1/10th what he'd make back home). He banks it all and lives on cheap rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he goes home with $X (or whatever his currency is). $X is 1/10 that he'd make in 2 years at home under the same conditions.

      #2. Indian guy goes to the US and works for 2 years. He makes a "mediocre" wage for a US job (still 10x what he'd make back home). Banks it all, eats rice, curry and lentils. After 2 years he, goes home. He now has 10x the money he'd have after 2 years of working in India.
      Well, first of all the salary for a mediocre graduate in the UK in an IT/Project Management role is approximately £15k. These guys in India are getting £5-7k - so the difference is only 1/3. I don't know enough about tax rates, but let's assume they are the same... Take home on 15k in the UK is about 12-13k, in India let's assume a 5k take-home. Now in the UK living costs for a single man living alone in a major city will run you around 8k in a fairly cheap suburb. Add public transport daily onto that, food and just a small reasonable bit of a social life at Western prices and you're probably talking around 11-12k expenditure per year with no holidays, PCs, gadgets, clothes etc. In India our guy with a 5k take home only has to buy some food - which will set him back almost nothing in India. So at the end of the year our worker in India is 3k-4k up on our worker in the UK, has gained experience in a foreign country in a senior role, enriched his life, could easily be the life of the party everywhere by splashing cash and can now choose where to work...
      Hardly a difference of 100x... In fact I would bet our Indian is better off. Apart from health care and pollution standards, I can't think of anything our UK worker has that our Indian doesn't...
    12. Re:Big difference in the results. by happyhangone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't now where this myth started but is annoying already, outsourced jobs are not exploiting labor from india or other countries. They pay well if you live there (money to eat, housing, and entertainent), of course, comparing those salaries with the US equivalent is pointless. This is the real reason for a few first-world people migrating to the third-world, you got the option of no working at all up there, or working and living well down there. Of course, nobody is talking about savings. Another fact is that many of those outsourced jobs need managers and staff from the original countries, they offer them the same pay but they got to live on india (example). With the US salary in a third world country, you live as big fat ceo any day...

    13. Re:Big difference in the results. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Work visas are only good for making money in a wealthy country and then going home to a poor
      > country. They suck for working in a poor country and then going home to a wealthy country.

      Yeah, unless all the jobs have been moved out of the rich country into the poor country. There's
      a point of desperation where having a roof over your head and free food is more than enough
      compensation for a day's work.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    14. Re:Big difference in the results. by speed-sf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, no one is *making* you go. 'Sides, hit up Taco Bell and get all the diarrhea you in the comfort of your homeland.

      --
      All your database are belong to us
    15. Re:Big difference in the results. by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

      BTW, in India, diarrhea is so common, it is normal for you to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea"

      Damn, dude, if it's that common, get a frickin' euphamism.

      "How are you doing?"
      "My elephant is rampaging again."
      or
      "I've got Ghandi's revenge again."
      or
      "I've been awarded the OBE (Order of Bowel Explosions)."

      Use your imagination, make it fun.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    16. Re:Big difference in the results. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Doing drugs? Listening to loud music? Am I missing something?

      Unless, by "partying", you mean LAN partying. I've never been to an actual "party" but I've seen lots of them on TV.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    17. Re:Big difference in the results. by Otter · · Score: 1
      Trust me, I am an Indian, and I've visited India enough times to know this.

      Well, yeah. Being a middle-class Indian IT worker in India for a year or two is only a fun, exciting adventure if you're not a middle-class Indian IT worker. If you are, I agree that a masters from Stanford and a job at Cisco make for a much more attractive alternative.

      Just like being an Italian peasant is only fun if you have a faculty position waiting for you back in Berkeley.

    18. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Never done it, eh? As someone who is doing it right now (in China, not India), I can say that it absolutely rocks, and will not get old for some time. I'm sure after some years it gets old...but how can you argue against having sex with 20-year-old women? Sorry, buddy, you sound like a NERRRRRRRRRD.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    19. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Oh, and you would feel OK employing this maid at a pittance, and exploiting her labor? Way to go, "tolerant" asshole.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re:Big difference in the results. by militiaMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the USA >$10/hr is hard to get now days unless you work for a union or corp/government. Most businesses in the USA are small. Average incomes are down for 30+ of the last 35 years when adjusted for inflation. www.bls.org This week 5 jobs in the whole IT section for Dallas Morning News. Wow that's 5 jobs for 20,000+ unemployeed IT workers in DFW. So if you make it to India you can make 22k a year and live great on $15/day. So your wrong, false government exchange rates are pushing U.S. citizens out.

    21. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consider that the pittance allows her to have a "comfortable"* life while the lack of pittance would put her in the slums.

      * comforatable means different things to different people.

      Otherwise way to go. Your comment style completely lacks any kind of intelligence. Is it by choice or you actually enjoy being stupid?

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    22. Re:Big difference in the results. by ThousandStars · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but how can you argue against having sex with 20-year-old women?

      Quite easily.

    23. Re:Big difference in the results. by jcam2 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that 'efficiency' comes from potentially low-paid workers in France and Germany not being able to get jobs at all, due to insane minimum wage laws? I'm sure the average US wage and thus productivity per worker could be increased if the lowest 10% of workers by salary were fired .. but would this be a good thing?

    24. Re:Big difference in the results. by kraut · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would feel very happy employing someone at the local going rate, or perhaps a bit higher if I felt it was warranted. How is that exploitation?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    25. Re:Big difference in the results. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Indian food in Western countries gives me the squits anyway. But a good vindaloo (I mean one that's practically inedible it's so hot) is a great cure for the common cold and many other ailments.

    26. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You might want to look up the definition of "exploitation" some day.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    27. Re:Big difference in the results. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Never let your soldier go into battle without a helmet. Problem solved.

      Besides, at the link you provided, most of the health risks involve homosexual men. Not my bag, baby!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    28. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Um, no one is *making* you go. 'Sides, hit up Taco Bell and get all the diarrhea you in the comfort of your homeland.

      Well, no shit.. The point I was making was that the parent poster had a serious misconception that India was a fun place. Interesting place, maybe, but certainly not the fun he seemed to think it is.

      BTW Taco Bell's ability to produce diarrhea doesn't even compare to shit that will be spewing out of your ass if you eat or drink the wrong thing in India.

      --
      #!/
    29. Re:Big difference in the results. by say · · Score: 3, Funny

      As someone who is doing it right now (in China, not India), I can say that it absolutely rocks

      Uhhm... you should really be paying more attention to the girl while you're "doing it". Slashdot is not a turn-on for everyone!

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    30. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. Being a middle-class Indian IT worker in India for a year or two is only a fun, exciting adventure if you're not a middle-class Indian IT worker.

      I'm not an Indian IT worker in India. I was born in the U.S. and having visited family there several times. I've always found visits to India to be pretty unpleasant. Its cool for about a week, then I want to get the hell out of there. Maybe it's just my perspective, being born in the U.S., but I think that's the point I was making. Even Indian people who have moved to the U.S. don't want to go back.

      --
      #!/
    31. Re:Big difference in the results. by Etherael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting and relevant statistic;

      it costs more to purchase a condom in india than a woman willing to use it with you.

      I spent a month in India, I didn't bother to even look for that side of things, but some girl on the street kissed me on the cheek and ran away for no apparent reason, so they can't be all *that* stuck up I guess.

      I only found out about the condom vs prostitute cost after leaving India, not that I would have taken advantage of said fact having had known it prior to this, however if you're the type of person who's idea of fun is getting drunk and fucking women with loose morals (and I'm not being down on you here, that's fine with me) then I assume the above information would mean you would be reasonably satisfied.

    32. Re:Big difference in the results. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Exploitation is pretty much the story all around. You think the people who hire you, ultimately, have the same standard that you do? Where does their improved standard of living come from? You don't have to be a Marxist to get what "surplus value" means.

    33. Re:Big difference in the results. by gordo3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      don't know if you were trying to just be funny, but if this was serious(which some moderators thought it was) its possibly the biggest idiocy I've ever heard.

      Lots of people like Indian food and as a foreign IT worker, its quite easy you hire yourself a cook.

      You do not get diarrhea in india without doing some of the most foolish things as a foreigner. Native indians rarely get it. As a foreigner, you get it from not realizing you do not have immunities to lots of the things in Indian water and food(namely, meat). If you drink tap water and are a foreigner, you're screwed. Hell, you can be indian and have been back to the country for several years and you have lost your immunities.

      Yes there is a lot of pollution, its what happens when you cram that many people into such small places. If you want away from the pollution, go to the country side. A lot like most major cities in non-industrialized countries(and many industrialized countries). that is just how it is and you should know it way before going there.

      your last line must be a joke but India can be a really fun place if you know where to go. You've probably been stuck doing the family thing every time rather than finding the nightlife out in Bombay or another major city(which can be incredible). I suggest to anyone going there, make local friends quickly. Almost all educated indians speak fluent english(with that fun accent) and by meeting the right ones, you will always be able to find something to do.

      Anyways, indian chicks do put out. Its why they are predicting that within 15 years, india will have the highest numer of Aids cases in the world.

    34. Re:Big difference in the results. by kalinh · · Score: 1

      > Where does their improved standard of living come from?

      Being paid or rewarded for possessing the rare skill of being able to manage others? Having more experience than thier know-it-all employees? Working harder to move forward in their carreers?

      Unless your employers have guns pointed at you, exploitation is pretty much a fantasy. You might need to be a Marxist to know what "surplus value" means, but you've got to be a non-Marxist to understand what it means.

      --

      Metamuscle.com - News in the Iro

    35. Re:Big difference in the results. by klaycomputer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So why the heck you even bother to post? Why don't you leave us alone and do whatever heck you do. People like you should never be trusted. Don't tell what you just wrote to your own mother. Even she will not be able to digest what you have become. If Mahatma Gandhi had thought like you, just imagine where you would be now. I live in a western country. From past few years. But for me now I have two homes.

    36. Re:Big difference in the results. by ashayh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with your argument is..
      Maids in India always live in slums..

      My mom has had like 40 maids in my lifetime (24 yrs) and they have always come from slums.

      Trust me, if you think you are doing these women any favour by hiring them to clean and cook you are sadly mistaken. Currently my mom in india pays her maid @20$ a month which is the very high end in India. In my undergrad years I paid my cleaning maid 5$ (FIVE) a month.

      In many cases their husbands are deserters drunkards and general losers who make their life difficult by beating, taking their money etc.My undergrad tution was 300$ a year. Plus books plus other expense.HOW do her children get educated, get 'proper' upbringing with a 50$ a month (600$ a year) salary?

      All maids my mom had were illiterate. I remember one maids daughter got married somewhere at the age of 9-12 (I dont remember, but she was pretty young).
      My mom-dad have tried to educate the maids children by paying for their Govt school (if you can call it a school) or tutoring them. But most of them are not interested in educating their children...they dont understand it.

      There are many such people in India who live totally fucked lives. Yes, and I call this exploitation. I have no solution for this, but I can tell you that its totally wrong to say its somehow any good for these women (and men) to slave like this.

      In fact, since coming to the US, I've come to very much appreciate the fact that many well off people will do their own laundry and cleaning and cooking... even I've learnt to cook after coming here.

      Another thing for comparision...In the US, my former landlords spring cleaning maid came in a new SUV. My landords an average US midde class fellow by the way.

    37. Re:Big difference in the results. by ashayh · · Score: 1

      6K UK is 500,000 Indian Rs a year and thats 42000Rs a month, = 500 UK a month.

      While people do get paid that much in India (the 'elite' IIT and Top-B-school types and other veterans), the VAST majority in IT have a salary of 200-400$ (or 100-210 UK) a month. A friend in India gets 300$ take home for working 100hrs a week. He graduated and got a job a year ago.

    38. Re:Big difference in the results. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      No, for having cash, which is abstract, rather than a skill, which only has a use value. Your labor is what it is - you can only barter it with people who need that labor. Money can be exchanged for goods and services universally. The differential in power is based on the difference between the flexibility of money and the reduced flexibility of labor and goods.

    39. Re:Big difference in the results. by hapuchu · · Score: 1

      He makes a "mediocre" wage
      Is it just the wage?
      In India the Euro-kid with his *mediocre* salary can have a house maid for cleaning utensils, vacuuming the house and ironing the clothes. He can even have cook for making the food. All this for the fraction of amount.
      Euro-kid just needs to go to work, eat, sleep and sh*t.
      While back in Europe, even with the *European salary*, Euro-kid needs to do everything on this own.
      I am not even counting other facilities like car drops and pickup and other VIP treatment give to Europeans in India.

    40. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm,

      GE contracts on nu-cu-lar plants, don't it?

      There are people who despite of being privileged and brought up being exposed to different cultures and ideas manage to stay remarkably close minded. BTW, it equally applies to Osama and our Fuhrer, Georgie King... (Heil!)

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    41. Re:Big difference in the results. by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      going there for job experience is worthless since you can instead work for a small company [...] in the US and get the same experience.

      Ehhhh, someone confusing 'job experience' with 'life experience' ..... Let's phrase that better, if you (in the USA) can hire a guy/gal that hanged out in university for a year longer than necessary, or another that did normal in university and after that "wasted" 2 years behind a helpdesk in India. Which one would you hire????

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    42. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I did.

      Unfortunately the dictionary does not include and warning to the extent of "eye of the beholder"...

      If you carefully look at your employment situation (I am ass-U-me-ing here, but statistically I might be right), one might characterize it as exploitation. I know mine could be argued, in spite of being a highly paid professional. I am paid the going rate, yet I know the work that I put in brings 100x revenue to my companies' owners. How about that for exploitation?

      How about exploitation, where the ruling elite decides on the minimum wage, and either refuses to have one (India) or sets it extremely low (US), so that you are stuck in the same wage jobs forever (can you imagine living on $5.25 even in rural America?). Even the relatively communist Santa Barbara local government's plan to increase hourly wage to $11 is laughable when your famaily income needs to be above $100K a year, in order to afford a median priced house in LA county (not even in Santa Monica).

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    43. Re:Big difference in the results. by pbox · · Score: 1

      I tolerate people being stupid. I equally tolerate stupid people hurting (or killing) themselves. It's all good and part of the same philosophy. Hmmm, maybe I should start a religion on this... Hobbard did pretty well (as in $$$) with his concotion...

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    44. Re:Big difference in the results. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      a few first-world people migrating to the third-world

      Just to note, despite the title Slashdot put on this, it's NOT about "migrating". More like extended working holidays, like some people take a few months travelling around Europe and may pick fruit for pocket money.

    45. Re:Big difference in the results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anyways, indian chicks do put out. Its why they are predicting that within 15 years, india will have the highest numer of Aids cases in the world.

      I can't quite tell; was the author intending for this to be a good thing, or a bad thing?

    46. Re:Big difference in the results. by northcat · · Score: 3, Informative

      India is not a fun place to live no matter how you slice it. Trust me, I am an Indian

      I'm an Indian too. I know your kind of people - "India sucks, every other country is better". If I were you I would be ashamed of myself. Looks like your kind of people are more common among Indian IT workers.

      and I've visited India enough times to know this.

      Exactly. You have visited India, not lived here. People of different countries have different kinds of fun. You can't have the kind of fun you have in USA or Somalia in India.

      BTW, in India, diarrhea is so common, it is normal for you to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea"

      If slashdot was in India, or if all slashdot mods had visited India, you would have been modded down as troll. This is the first time I'm hearing "Indians have diarrhea". For all the other slashdot readers: This guy deosn't live in India, he has just visited it, so he doesn't know more than any other foreigner who has visited India. If fact he "knows" even less than others because his type of people already have a bad image of India in their minds.

      and eating shitty food is not my idea of fun.

      This exactly what I am talking about. Calling Indian food shitty is completely baseless. He just thinks it must be bad because its Indian.

    47. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you didn't make India sound any better (the comment about HIV/AIDS cases pretty much sums it up).

      --
      #!/
    48. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Gandhi suffered to do what he did. He was a saint.

      However, I am not speaking to people who are saints. I am speaking to the typical American IT worker, warning them that India is not some wonderous place. It's a hostile environment. It's amazing that people can live in that hostile environment, and I commend you for that.

      --
      #!/
    49. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      For all the other slashdot readers: This guy deosn't live in India, he has just visited it, so he doesn't know more than any other foreigner who has visited India. If fact he "knows" even less than others because his type of people already have a bad image of India in their minds.

      Yes, I have only visited India for periods of 3 months at a time. But that's the point. Some American IT worker is going to experience the same thing I did when he moves over there to only stay a year or two. It's a harsh environment, and I commend you for being able to live through it. I don't recommend it to my fellow Americans who are used to a much easier environment.

      Someone who actually lives in India is going to have another perspective because you are used to it.

      If you want to experience something different, go ahead and visit / move to India. But don't expect it to be a pleasant trip.

      I've met a lot of people who moved to the U.S. from India that no longer want to go back even to visit India.

      BTW, I am not ashamed. I am telling it like it is. If it offends a ton of people, I'm not sorry.

      --
      #!/
    50. Re:Big difference in the results. by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude you are just such a fucking typical ABCD, get the fuck over it. Just because Indian women don't want to sleep with you, doesn't mean they don't put out. I mean it's difficult to rape 500 Million women, dumb fuck. Further you got diarrhea because you are total fucking moron. Next time, try drinking a little bottled water. I lived in America, and am very to be back in India, thanks. And shit bags like you can stay exactly where you are, inventing a new flavour of toothpaste while the rest of us can go on living happy, productive lives. Just because your family happens to be a bunch of village idiots isn't my problem. If somebody took me to Rectumsville, Idaho for my US Vacation insetad of New York City, I think I'd have a pretty interesting picture of America. So, do yourself a favour, and go fuck yourself.

    51. Re:Big difference in the results. by pebs · · Score: 1

      I commend you for being able to live in such a harsh environment. You are an inspiration to humanity. Good luck.

      --
      #!/
  31. Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I've always been a nomad so that is no problem for me. The problem is more in little things like not being able to take my pets if I move to a different country. Most countries have some sort of period you have to leave your pets in quaratine which is usually long enough to make it somewhat cruel IMO.

    Also moving personal items can be a pain. All my DVDs are from the US, England, and Japan. That is enough to make life hard without a region free DVD player. If I moved to more countries and bought more DVDs in each country it'd just make the problem harder? Things like region codes definately seem anti-globalization to me. Then you get into the trouble of moving a dozen computers and getting power adapaters for them all and stuff like that.

    So.. if you plan to be nomadic outside the boundries of your home country then try not to have pets or a lot of stuff that'd be a pain to move.

    On the other hand it's my experience that it isn't hard to pick up girls and take them with you. "Hey, I'm going to Thailand, Malaysia, and India next week.. wanna go with me." is one hell of a pick-up line. Maybe that makes it worthwhile to give up my cat and my computers?

    What I think we really need is a tribe of nomads that migrate from country to country together and can make deals for our services as a group. A little geek tribe. Maybe we could legally make it a corporation to make it easier to work out deals.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Nomads! by torpor · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a nomad and all I can say is:

      1. nomads have no need for pets.

      2. nomads don't posess much. things posess you, take only what you need.

      What I think we really need is a tribe of nomads that migrate from country to country together and can make deals for our services as a group.

      Yes, I have encountered this idea many times in my travels.. it would indeed be an interesting association to make, a few thousand nomads on the globe, or so ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Nomads! by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      If you have a laptop with a DVD drive, you can use the AnyDVD driver software to bypass that region encoding bullshit. Or, you can pick up a cheap Chinese or Taiwanese DVD player that will ignore region encoding(So I've heard.)

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    3. Re:Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately various females have given me pets and while I would not have gotten pets for myself I do however like them. Of course I get around this limitation somewhat by leaving them, at times, with friends and family and just visiting them whenever I'm able. This isn't really ideal though because I can't afford to visit often. The same goes for actually visiting the friends and family I have.

      Again I agree in theory. For years I owned hardly anything. Gradually I am starting to build up property though which would pain me to replace or give up. To some degree the digital property I have I can put online. This is probably illegal in the US but that is really besides the point. I can copy all my movies, software, and music onto a server and access those files from anywhere and not bother carrying the originals around. I've been making some effort to transfer my collection of books and magazines (technical) into a digital format too. Most of my crap I don't mind lossing. Furniture and off the shelf electronics is easy enough to replace. I hate to give up some of the computers I've built myself though as some are rather unique. In the least I always keep my harddrives when I move so that I have a copy of all my data I've ever produced. As a programmer and engineer I have lots of work on those drives. Having been online more than a decade I have much of my life on those drives also. I tend to also keep the before mentioned digital copies of media on my drives as actually finding server space where you can get terabytes of space affordably isn't that easy yet. :)

      I think these problems would be lessened by moving in tribes. We could have community property such as servers that'd contain the entire tribes data. Files such as movies, music, and software could be kept as a single copy instead of everyone needing their own copies. Any family, friends, and even pets that belonged to the tribe could be brought with you into new countries. Really moving as tribes is the smart way for nomads to go.

      I've thought about setting up some sort of geek tribe here in the US and then gradually moving outward. Buy some bits of land throughout the US and allow any geek and their family to move onto this tribal land (and back and forth across different locations) so long as they join the tribe and follow the rules. Something a bit communal but not entirely. I suppose a little like native Americans were once upon a time.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      True, I remove the region encoding anyway when I copy the DVDs. It's just the theory that to do such things legally there is a fair amount of hassle involved.

      The same as that since I move a lot I try not to own many things which therefore gives me no credit or equity if I needed to take out a loan or something. When you try to get credit, a job, or really anything they usually want to know how long you've lived at your current address and why you move so often. Little hassles like that. In the US at least it is somewhat frowned upon to live a nomadic lifestyle. You can believe any crackpot religion you want to, sleep with anyone you want to, etc but if you move to a new city every year then people think there is something wrong with you.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:Nomads! by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a nomad and all I can say is:
      1. nomads have no need for pets.
      2. nomads don't posess much. things posess you, take only what you need.

      How sad. It sounds so sterile. No pets. No home. No community to support and receive support from. No traditions. No family heirlooms or property. No place to call your own. I've read a number of your comments in this discussion, and you can have your nomadic existence. I would not willingly give up the things that make life enjoyable and satisfying.

    6. Re:Nomads! by kraut · · Score: 1

      Dude - if DVD region coding (which sucks, agreed) and power adaptors are your main problem, you have it wayto easy ;)

      BTW: get a laptop. You know, little computers that fold up. Much more convenient that lugging that CRT on the plane.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    7. Re:Nomads! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I never bother moving monitors anyway. It's mostly the harddrives I worry about. Sadly I've yet to see a laptop that can hold terabytes of data. That'd be really awesome though. :)

      Usually when I move I don't bother taking much of anything besides computer stuff with me.. not even spare cloths. I guess that means I'm a geek. Yes, in a single move, I've traveled more than 1500 miles by bus with nothing but a mini-itx files erver with a terabyte of data stuffed into a backpack. You can't get much geekier a nomad than that.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  32. Re:Numbers are too small by mikael · · Score: 1

    What is significant is that people are willing to relocate to a third world country inspite of all the general problems there like bad internet connectivity, bad roads, power problems etc.

    You haven't tried living out in rural England :)

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  33. Re:Numbers are too small by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    With an influx of smart westerners how long do you think India will stay a third world country? They're getting all the jobs from those western countries while the best workers from the western countries flee to India in order to have jobs. If India plays this right they could easily become a world power while the arrogant western countries slowly slide down the tubes.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  34. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right-O.

    I'm certain that that expensive "Western"
    college education that you borrowed money
    to get can EASILY be paid off with the big
    paycheck you're going to get from that Indian
    IT company. And the storage company that you
    trusted all of your worldly possessions with
    will happily accept rupees, and a 1/10 of the
    per month agreed to storage payment. Oh, and
    God help you if you should get sick while over
    there working in India -- most Western medical
    plans will not cover your overseas "deployment".
    (Well, you could rely on the herbal remedies
    available locally -- just put enough money aside
    to have your body shipped home to Mum and Pop.)

    Thanks, but no thanks.

  35. Re:You know by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Of course the Filipinos don't suffer. They get a well paying job relative to other available work in the Phillipines. The one who suffers is you, as the people you put out of work will no longer be able to buy your product and you will go out of business.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  36. Re:Free snacks!?!?!?! by tomcio.s · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course.. You can eat snacks.. Stock options are only useful for after-snacking :-)

  37. US a wealthy country? by Drakonite · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...you obviously haven't been watching the USD lately.

    --
    Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    1. Re:US a wealthy country? by garaged · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And you havent seen 3rd world salaries very soon

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    2. Re:US a wealthy country? by relaxmax · · Score: 1

      And you haven't seen the price of rice, curry and lentils in the US.

      --
      Love all, Trust few, Follow one.
  38. Who says you cant have a life... by WebCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...beyond work if you live a life as a "nomad"? That's crap! It's the 21st century man! Communications technology makes physical location nearly irrelevant. Many of my family members and friends travel extensively and have made good friends with fellow nomads all over the world. IM and email are good for keeping in touch--you should try using them sometimes. My girlfriend's brother met an Aussie nomad in Vancouver, now ehty arte engaged to be married in Australia. They both have friends and family on three continents. All my more nomadic friends manage to stay in touch and some even meet up several times a year--sometimes in locations that are neither person's "home"!

    A nomadic lifestyle isn't for everyone, so if you prefer to put down roots somewhere there is always telecommuting--that is essentially what workers in India, Ireland, Canada and other outsourcing hotspots are doing for their parent companies anyways.

    The Aussie is right--this is an era of globalisation and you'd better get used to it. It is sad that the US, a country historically known for its pioneering spirit and innovation, has become more whiny, inward-looking and reactionary than the average country with respect to immigration. The US got where it is today beause of immigration from all over the world. It seems selfish in this day and age to expect the rest of the world shouldn't be able to benefit from immigration as well.

    Hey, if Darwin's theory works in nature expect it in the economy as well. The US will adapt or die. India and other developing nations have been closer to death and have simply started adapting faster. In the end it'll all even out--unless of course politics unduly interferes and fouls up the balance of things.

    1. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Communications technology makes physical location nearly irrelevant.

      How are you going to raise a child through IM? How are you going to take care of your parents through ICQ?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      You don't care for them through AIM and ICQ, you take your family with you--I was talking of having a social life. My cousin and her husband travelled the world with an infant...their son had been to 8 countries by the time he was two. Done right raising a family while travelling the globe makes them more open and tolerant of different cultures and ways of life.

      Some dorm-mates I had were "army-brats" and spent their entire childhood at bases all around the world. They were extremely smart and had an education superior to what one could obtain through the public systems in North America (those that took the International Baccuralate programme in high school seemed to handle 1st-year university work better than most).

    3. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >you take your family with you

      You can't drag your 80 year-old mother around the world everytime you change jobs.

      Ask your cousin if she rather prefer to raise their child moving to a new culture/country each year or staying in one neighbourhood until the child is 18.

      Ask any 12 year old if they want to leave their school/friends/way-of-life for some alien culture. Hell, try asking him to turn off the tv and clean his room for that matter, if you think child raising is so easy.

      >Done right raising a family while travelling the globe

      Anything is possible if "done right". Raising a family "right" is hard enough in a consistant environment.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by zzyzx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being an army brat isn't the same thing.

      You have more of a support structure there. No matter where you go, you're going to have other families around with other people who speak the same language as you. You have a lot fewer safety issues both physical and cultural.

    5. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      You can't drag your 80 year-old mother around the world everytime you change jobs.

      Who says you have to travel/live with your mother? You're a big boy now, and she might like the independence (you are assuming that 80 year-olds are frail and/or they need the constant care and attention of their children--not true). I know it's possibly a cultural thing, or perhaps a lot of /.ers live with their parents until they are that old. Not everyone will want to (or have to) travel the world of course.

      Ask your cousin if she rather prefer to raise their child moving to a new culture/country each year or staying in one neighbourhood until the child is 18.

      Actually they wouldn't mind at all. *I* wouldn't, but that's a personal preference.

      Ask any 12 year old if they want to leave their school/friends/way-of-life for some alien culture. Hell, try asking him to turn off the tv and clean his room for that matter, if you think child raising is so easy.

      What if that 12-year-old's life WAS about travelling and being in an "alien culture"? Ever talk to a kid who was home-schooled or educated in a foreign place who has had to adjust to the cruel culture-shock of American public school? Such a person might get quite restless in US Surburbia.

      I also don't recall stating anywhere that raising a child is easy. I didn't even suggest that someone with an already established family and home environment might even consider it appealing. In any case the most important consistency in a child's life is its parents and family. I'd say that a child who has the love and attention of its parents but moves all over the world is much better off than the kid who has lived in the same house his whole life but whose parents work 80 hour weeks at EA.

    6. Re:Who says you cant have a life... by underCat · · Score: 1

      I grew up moving around and I wouldn't trade it for the world. The only bad thing about it is that I don't understand people with your views. I don't see the "normality" of the homesteaded lifestyle. Not everyone grows up like Beaver Cleaver. And we don't miss it. A child's idea of normal is set according their environment. If that environment is constantly changing then change becomes the norm and they identify with it. I does change your perception of the world. I look at things differently than friends I have that grew up in one spot.

      That being said, I like to be around family on certain holidays. Today being one. Family also includes good friends made while moving around.

      I caution folks to not consider their idea of normal to be shared by all. Nor even consider it to be desirable.

      I'd love to work overseas but I have a really good job here right now. But if anyone knows of any opportunities in Spain... let's talk.

      --
      Sig? No, thanks. I don't smoke.
  39. bedtime? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Hey, I know! Let's post a story about India just before all the Indians go to bed!
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:bedtime? by cheeni · · Score: 1

      Damn straight - yet another India story, and yet another transmogrification of /. into a klan meeting. Actually I'm kinda suprised at the lack of venom in this page; it must be because the primary actors here are WHITE swiss kids.

      Exactly when did I begin to peg /. down as a racist cabal? Must have been around the time them India stories started to get noticed. No, this was well after /. had stopped being cool; the good people had left or actively lurked.

      Is it the relative anonymity of the web that causes these racist feelings to flow freely ?

      Where were the racist bigots on /. hiding when I lived in America ? Were they the ones with the polite plastic smiles that I could never figure out ?

      Globalization is good for you. I know I love America, and I love the countless Americans who are friends, bosom buddies, mentors, peers and even family (3 cousins to be exact are married to White Americans).

      I got to know first-hand what it feels like to be brown in a white country, but fortunately for those of you planning on moving to India, being non-brown is not a crime here.

      Welcome...

  40. Re:Not completely by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

    I've dealt with bonehead programmers from India, bonehead programmers from Mexico, and bonehead programmers from Berkeley.

    India does not have any monopoly on clueless newbies: Why, just look at how many we have here on /., most of whom are from the US :)

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  41. Re:pay? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

    You work for your entire life, in exchange for some coins. On return to the US, you can put these worthless coins in a sock, to use as a club in defense of your shopping cart.

    --
    "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  42. Some data points... by baywulf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here are some more information based on people I know:

    I had 2 coworkers go back to their home country (China) because they find the opportunities are better there now. They both had green cards and stable employment here yet choose to go.

    I had 1 coworker who wanted to leve computer programming field because be belived the reward to work ratio was too low compared to many other professions.

    I know one guy who is in college and came with his parents and now has a green card. Yet the only computer science internship he could find was back in his home country for the summer.

    Another person who became a citizen here had an offer from work to start offshore office in his home country at roughly the same salary as here. Otherwise he could stay here and travel a lot. He choose to stay here are the rest of his family is accustomed to living here.

    I guess what we are seeing here is a kind of equilibrium mechanism. At one time all the good jobs were in the US (or "Western" contries in general) so there was a mad rush for people to get here. Now things have been shifting to be more equal and the migration is trickling the other way.

  43. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    God help you if you should get sick while over
    there working in India -- most Western medical
    plans will not cover your overseas "deployment".
    (Well, you could rely on the herbal remedies
    available locally -- just put enough money aside
    to have your body shipped home to Mum and Pop.)


    Actually, India is becoming somewhat of a medical tourist destination, you probably won't have to worry about medical bills and health insurance so much if you "self-insure" -- the health insurance companies don't seem to have their claws in the system over there like they do in the US so medicine is still reasonably affordable, especially for someone with a decent (indian) job.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  44. And where is Mumbai? by gosand · · Score: 1

    For those interested, Mumbai was formerly known as Bombay.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  45. On the road again... by adoll · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My 12 year engineering career has taken me to Australia, Chile, Indonesia, the USA and elsewhere in Canada. The only places I really didn't love to live in were Indonesia and California (no offense, y'all).

    I'm presently on the move from Alberta to British Columbia for work, so yes, migration can also happen without leaving your own country. There has always been a place for mobile professionals in the world -- in the 1800s they were explorers, fur traders and mercenaries, in the 1900s they were generally business men, and in the 2000s they are engineers and exotic dancers.

    -AD

  46. Re:No Way by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And Buddhists are worse than Mormons, Scientologists, or Jehovah's Witnesses? I can't recall the last time a Buddhist knocked on my door trying to save my soul from reincarnation as a worm, a bird, or some other lower form of life like, say, you.

    Actually, an Indian engineer gets about $20K starting salary. Given the prices of things in India, that's about the equivalent of a $50K salary. You can't buy a hummer on that salary, but you wouldn't WANT one in Indian city traffic. My friend Sumit has a tiny little car, and even so, one of us had to get out to STOP TRAFFIC so we could get through.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  47. Re:Numbers are too small by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

    The best workers flee to India? I think the best ones will be the ones the American companies keep. They will be letting go of the bad to middle of the road ones and only keeping the cream of the crop. (In most cases that is. I know how office politics go and sometimes the good worker will be let go while some suckup stays).

  48. Working vacation? by Thimble · · Score: 1

    Now if only they would outsource IT jobs to Bali, I'd be jumping on a plane...

  49. Re:Numbers are too small by cloffin · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt that the quality of life is bad in India. Every country has beautiful areas, and every country has rich people.

    Indians go to the west to move up from a comparatively middle class life to a upper class life back in India. They seem like they are very unlikely to settle down in the west.

  50. Definition of "globalisation" by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    (from dictionary.com)

    globalisation

    n : growth to a global or worldwide scale

    It doesn't say anything about exploitation of developing nations. The word is mis-used by way too many people.

    The (Canadian) city where I live hosted a big international summit some time ago. Protesters staged continual demonstrations about the evils of "Globalisation" (peaceful ones to their credit). Literally the majority of these protesters came from outside Canada, from the US and all over Europe. Was it lost on them that they were participating in the GLOBALISATION of their protest movement?

    Globalisation is inevitable...there is NOTHING that can or should be done to stop it. What is important is that you make your voice heard and be an active participant in the process. I may not have agreed with everything the protesters had to say (and am amused at their use of the word) but I applaud them for making their views known and doing it peacefully.

    As for going to live in 3rd world countries it seems that in most cases skilled workers (both native and immigrant) are actually treated quite well. They pay is only mediocre by western standards. The quality of life is on par with middle class America. Housing is cheap or free and the employer provides free transportation to and from the office. I'd say that's changing people's attitudes alright--their views of globalisation are becoming more favourable.

    1. Re:Definition of "globalisation" by computational+super · · Score: 1
      in most cases skilled workers (both native and immigrant) are actually treated quite well

      Hehe - that might make it worth the trip. As somebody with a four-year degree in computer science (currently pursuing a master's degree in the same) and 10 years experience desigining and implementing software, it might be an interesting change of pace to live in an environment where I'm actually considered skilled rather than treated consistently like a lego piece that can be replaced with little or no impact. In America (at least in the last three or four years), professional programmers are generally treated with slightly less respect than drug addicts who live in burned-out tenement buildings. At least they get their weekends off.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  51. Oh well, no jobs for me! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I can tell, this is just call center stuff for the 20-somethings, not an opportunity for middle age coders, sysadmins, and DBAs. Too bad, I'd love to go to India.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  52. We Can Only Hope by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > Is this the first wave of the much anticipated
    > reverse-migration which will be a hallmark of
    > the 21st century?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  53. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by Jakosa · · Score: 1

    With that much angst, I can understand why you dont't go to India.

  54. Re:A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    this is so bogus I dont know where to begin. evidentally you have never seen the images that radiologists read these days. modern multi-detector CT scanners have resolutions to .4 mm, are multiplanar, and show 3-D reconstructions immediately. they scan the body entirely in 20 seconds. they can be assessed around the world in a matter of a few seconds. modern MR is evolving just as quicklyl, with multichannel processing. I can only assume that this writer has no knowledge of radiology at all. yes, I can sit in New Delhi and read a study from Chicago, and via voice dictation, provide an answer in minutes. but as I stated, it is a matter of licensing and taxing, not image quality.

  55. I disagree by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I would have to say that Americans have a stronger sense of family than other countries.. Look at their thanksgiving weekend.... Airports, train stations, etc are packed with travellers. Up in in Canada we can't say the same thing.

    Many people live a fair distance from their families, myself included.. I'm willing to move for work but i'm not willing to traverse continents.. The further you live from Family the less you see them.. IM, emailing or talking on the phone isn't the same as being there with them. You miss out on ALOT of stuff.. If you don't agree with that then you don't have a sense of family or you haven't live away from them long enough to realize.

    I've lived away from home for 7 years now.. and I miss it more and more each day... I've missed so much i'm afraid i'm going to regret it down the road.. i'm already starting to regret it now.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:I disagree by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many people live a fair distance from their families, myself included.

      I wonder if Europeans sometimes don't grasp the distances that some people in the US live away from their relatives. Aside from my parents, my closest relatives are 800 miles (1300km) away. Given that (judging from a quick look at a map of europe) No european country is that long in any dimension, that is farther than anyone probably has to travel. Usually the only time I've been able to see them is at Christmass. If we lived half as far away we could see them a lot more often due to the time involved in travel.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would have to say that Americans have a stronger sense of family than other countries.

      That's the biggest sack of shit I have heard all week.

      Look at their thanksgiving weekend.... Airports, train stations, etc are packed with travellers. Up in in Canada we can't say the same thing.

      Which planet did you come from? Thanksgiving is an american holiday.

    3. Re:I disagree by speed-sf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, seeing as more people live in the state of California or New York than all of Canada it makes sense when the Airports/Train Stations/etc are packed. Besides, thanksgiving between the two coutries is wildly different. Compare Christmas, that would be more realistic. Per capita travel is likely very close. Tis about perspective.

      --
      All your database are belong to us
    4. Re:I disagree by jwdb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would have to say that Americans have a stronger sense of family than other countries

      Sorry, but unless you can back this up I'm gonna have to disagree, having lived in America and Europe. Thanksgiving is actually proof of a weak sense of family - it says they need a national holiday as excuse before they can do something together. For the rest of year, people pretty live individually, most noticable in the fact that many American families don't even eat dinner together.

      I have quite the involved family here in Belgium. If I'm at home, I'll eat with my family (which is every weekend). I'll stop by at one uncle's for breakfast, then spend the evening at another's place. We have two family reunions every year, and my grandparents regularly have big dinner parties, especially if it's their birthday.

      If I don't see a family member for two weeks, that's already a long time...

      I got nothing against the Americans - hell, I'm moving back there next year - but they do not have a strong sense of family at all, due to the individualistic culture.

      Jw

    5. Re:I disagree by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      Ah, but why don't you just move back then? That's one of the ironies in this - people flocking to see their familes and loved-ones, but then getting back on that plane a few days later to travel as far as possible away from them.

    6. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      >>No european country is that long in any dimension

      Norway.
      I live 1600km ++ from my parents and family. ;-(

      And YES distance matters:
      -Your mother can not make food for you.
      -Friends can't "just come over".
      -Traveling takes time and money.
      -I live in a sometimes totally diffeent world when it comes to economy, food, weather, social life, job oppurtunities etc.

    7. Re:I disagree by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      Probably the planet that has a Canadian Thanksgiving holiday in October.

    8. Re:I disagree by Tripster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny thing that family stuff.

      I moved to Canada with my father and stepmom back in 1980 from Scotland, leaving behind my mother and a few siblings.

      I haven't seen them since then, I have communicated with my mom a bit but we don't really keep in steady contact of any sort.

      Of course this seperation not only from my real mom but also from the rest of our extended family has really left me with little sense of family life at all.

      Right now I live in a different province than my dad, they are 1000km from me. I talk to them on the phone maybe every other month. They recently came to visit my wife and I, first time they had been here in 4 years. I have been to visit them once in the last 10 years.

      My sense of family togetherness is all but gone, I spend little time with my wife's family too and they have a hard time understanding that it isn't them but me as I just don't get into family functions that much. Likely because I all but stopped having them at 13 when we moved here.

      Do I miss it? Sure, but at the same time I realize life goes on, I realize I need to fend for myself through life anyway. Then again, my dad was never all that supportive, he was never the type I could turn to if I needed help financially, etc.

      My wife's parents on the other hand are the complete opposite. They would help in an instant if we asked. She talks to them daily, etc.

    9. Re:I disagree by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Which planet did you come from? Thanksgiving is an american holiday.

      One on which American *families* get together to enjoy their time off, enjoy each others' company, and maybe even celebrate the discovery of the American land.

    10. Re:I disagree by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      No, Americans have less of a family sense than other countries.
      Americans are weird compared with - say - Europeans. During their life they generally move several times - often vast differences. Europeans - in general - do not. They usually stay at least in the same city, often the same neighbourhood.

      So when Americans try to have a family meeting (once a year - wow!) you need to travel a lot (Hank has to come over from CA, Joe comes up from Texas and so on - why didn't they all just stay in NYC?).

      Why? They had to move for work. Why? Well, it's because America is obsessed with fear, money and power - they are fairly uninterested in making life better (for anyone, let alone employees) when they (or at least the powerful) can just force them to do what is convenient. [And as you mostly just voted for George Bush, you can look forward to a lot more of pushing people about - and being pushed. Enjoy!].

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    11. Re:I disagree by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Sweden is certainly a lot longer than that - and n0ot unusual for people from the north to move south for university or work. Also, it is becoming more and more common for people to work in other European countries, living even farther from their families.

      This distance pissing contest is moot, however, beyond a certain distance. As soon as you live far enough that airplane is the only reasonably quick way to close the distance (perhaps 1000km, depending on the available alternatives), it doesn't really matter much how far you live until you start changing continents. And that only becomes a factor due to the cost of travel, not the time as such.

      I can say I have almost the same amount of contact with my parents when I live in Japan as when I lived in southern Sweden. In some ways more, as we tend to call more often, rather than wait for infrequent visits.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    12. Re:I disagree by Stone316 · · Score: 1
      Ok, who modded this insightful? Last time I checked Belgium is like the size of Vermont! You go for a drive and your in another country! You can't compare families in tiny European countries to the states. Alot of family are spread apart by hundreds/thousands of miles so they can't have a weekly family dinner parties.

      Same up here in Canada, unless you grew up in a major centre chances are you moved for work. The majorty of people I went to school with are either spread across Canada and into the states. Not by choice, i'm sure alot of them would rather live closer at home.. At least 90% of the people that I know up here would like to move back.

      You don't need a national holiday to be with your family but as I said before if you live in another part of the country its great opportunity to get back for a visit. The idea behind Thanksgiving is why so many people travel for that holiday... Maybe it means nothing to you...

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    13. Re:I disagree by Stone316 · · Score: 1
      I'd love to move back closer to my family.. Are you willing to employ me? No? Should I work at McD's and shop at thrift stores for my kids clothes? No? Yes?

      There are many reasons why people move away and the big one is work. I'd love to move back to where i'm from but the economy is very weak. Its one of the few provinces were the population is decreasing.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    14. Re:I disagree by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      FYI, generalizing about Americans like that is just as stupid as other generalizations. I know a LOT of people with whom I interact daily who spent today with both sides of their family in the same day. In many of those cases, every single member of the extended family attended.

      Keep in mind that there are 300 million people in the US and we have some of the widest ranges of diversity of anywhere on earth. In many communities, Americans do exactly what your European examples do: live in the same city for their entire lives. Oftentimes, these roots go back several generations. Except for my little pocket of family and a few here and there, my extended family (my grandparents, mother's 5 brothers, father's 3 brothers and their entire families (including children and, now grandchildren) totaling well over 100 people all still live in the same county that my great-grandparents immigrated to 100 years ago. Their children attend the same schools that they did, work the same farms they did and share in regular meals and gatherings together.

      The vast majority of Americans are NOT obsessed with fear, money and power. They just want to live their lives (pretty much like people the whole world over).

      Also, to equate George Bush's policies with the desires of the American people (given that only 1/3 of the population even voted and only 51% of those voted for Bush, and a significant percentage of those didn't do so enthusiastically, putting the real "mandate" at closer to 18%) is ignorant.

      How about this? I won't make gross assumptions about Europeans based only on the news I read and the things I see on TV and the Europeans who come here and you stop believing that Thanksgiving is the first time this year that all 300 million of us suddenly realized we have a family and frantically ran all over the country to find them. Please don't be simple.

    15. Re:I disagree by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      "Please don't be simple" ... how can I help it? - I'm called Simon

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    16. Re:I disagree by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      Yes, but considering the sheer amount of people who move around during the holidays, I take it that the job supply isn't dwindling in over half the nation.

    17. Re:I disagree by jwdb · · Score: 1

      And what about your own family then? I wasn't only referring to the extended, but to the nuclear too. Before I started college, I ate at home almost every evening, chatted with my parents, ignored the phone... The only one of my friends who did likewise were 1st generation Americans. For the rest, it was eat when you're hungry, maybe with the family but probably without.

      It doesn't take much effort, but I met very few people who were willing to do even that. It may seem insignificant, but when is the family otherwise ever together?

      Jw

    18. Re:I disagree by Zilquis · · Score: 1
      I was in Norway recently and was quite surprised when i got told if you turn Norway upside down it would reach all the way to Rome. Made me realise just how long it is.

      Norway was a fantastic place to go

    19. Re:I disagree by pyota · · Score: 1

      stonger sense of family? then why have they got the higest divorce rate?

      imho americans have got it all wrong. the indispensible college education burys everyone in debt before they even start their career .. they then work like dogs for the rest of their days, trying to meet a zillion interest payments while paltry holidays allow only for brief conjugal visits. meanwhile, they are oblivious to the orwellian police state they reside in, as they are constantly plugged in to the state run media, but still think they are land of the free.

  56. It's not about saving money by Whiteout · · Score: 1

    With the disparity between incomes in developed and developing countries, of course it doesn't make sense to try to save money in a developing country with short-term work (though I wouldn't be surprised if is some money to be made somewhere). That's not the point. The point is to live in and experience a country and pay your way while you're there. Think VSO or it's US equivalent, Peace Corps; think work-for-accomodation in backpackers' hostels around the world, and so on. There's an awful lot more to life than money.

    By the way, there's very good health care available in India if your not desperately poor. Otherwise, there's plain old travel insurance to cover repatriation.

  57. Re:Have you actually been to India? by Razor's+Edge · · Score: 1

    glrotate, you're obviously concluding that all of India is like the big city in India which you visited. I've made many visits to India and your summary matches my impressions of Kolkata for the most part.
    Thankfully most of India is still rural and NOT like you describe. Every time I arrive in India I make sure to get the heck out of the city as quickly as possible due to primarily the horrible pollution. The smaller towns, villages and cities can be delightful compared with the city life.
    I'd hate for anyone too conclude that all of the USA is like Manhatten or LA.
    Also, there is no religious ground for the animals walking the streets. It's simply a different philosophy.

  58. Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by dwalsh · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are counting the 10X factor twice, and multiplying them. This is wrong.

    Look at it from the point of view of one country or the other, not both.

    Let's say the guy arrives back to India and compares his lot with the European, who is about to leave. He has saved 10 times as much as the European. End of story.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
    1. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lets demonstrate with some figures.

      Indian goes to America, and earns $50,000 per year for two years. He spends $25,000 per year on his living costs, so when he returns to India, he has $50,000 in the bank.

      American goes to India, and earns $5,000 per year for two years. He spends $2,500 per year on his living costs, so when he returns to America, he has $5,000 in the bank.

      Now lets look at the Indian. He is now living in India with $50,000, which the equivalent of ten years salary in the bank. That is a pretty reasonable sum of money. You are well on your way to being able to retire on that.

      What about the American. He is now living in America with $5,000 in the bank. That is the equivalent of about 5 weeks salary. Enough to cover fluctuations in his outgoings and prevent him from going overdrawn. Probably better than a lot of people, but nothing spectacular.

    2. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by bilsaysthis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your figures ignore the taxes that, at least in the US, will be deducted as withholding from salary. $50k after US and state (esp. California and NY where so many Indian workers are located) surely comes to less than $35k net and so the savings end up much lower. Then again, H1-b is usually closer to six years than two.

    3. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      True. It is the same in India, and pretty much every where else in the world.

      Lets just say that the tax was part of the living costs. The point of the illustration was to show that the grandparent was right to say that the Indian would be 100x better off than the American / European. Even if you add tax as an additional expense, the figures still work.

    4. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by wolfdvh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You are quite right, except for the young euro or american kid looking for a bit of adventure those are not the destinations.

      If you look at the real ex-pat community, you find them in exotic but different places, where instead of earning less they earn much more than their "home" wages. Until recently that meant some wealthy arab emmerate where unless you lived in a company 50's style compound with you family your social life wasn't so great but after a few years you could return with ten years western wages saved.

      The current analog for the western working class would be those folks from Mississippi or Liverpool working as a civilian contractors in Iraq. Not much of a life while they are there but if they survive, they will come home with several years wages in the bank.

    5. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I know of one person who when to Iraq enticed by the prospect of large quantities of tax free cash. I think it was something like GBP15,000 per month.

      After having his car bombed three times in the space of one month, he decided that no amount of money was worth the the very real risk of being killed.

      As he returned without spending a full tax year out of the country, he had to pay UK tax on his earnings. He now earns about GBP25,000 per year, and pays tax on that.

    6. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by timpaton · · Score: 3, Funny
      American goes to India, and earns $5,000 per year for two years. He spends $2,500 per year on his living costs, so when he returns to America, he has $5,000 in the bank...What about the American. He is now living in America with $5,000 in the bank.

      How about:

      American goes to India and earns $5000 per year for two years. That makes him rich beyond the wildest dreams of his Indian peers. He lives like a king for $4,000 per year living costs, pisses another $500 per year up the wall on who knows what, and has $1000 left for his ticket home. He arrives home with the same bank balance as when he left, a big grin, and a hell of a lot of good stories...

    7. Re:Bad Math - You have doubled booked the profits. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Probably true, except that I guess you can live like a king for $2,500.

      Your housing, food, and travel to work are paid for by the employer, so basically anything you spend is going to be on enjoying yourself.

      If you have the purchasing power equivalent of $25,000 to spend on parties, you are going to have a pretty good time.

  59. Re:A Shame by GuyZero · · Score: 1

    Awesome. Why would someone post this anon though, as it's unlikely anyone will see you telling me how full of shit I am.

    Not that I'm doing it on purpose - the number of radiologists working with ye shitte olde x-ray is probably two orders of magnitude higher than your multi-detector CT scanner, so my point isn't entirely bogus.

  60. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm certain that that expensive "Western" college education that you borrowed money to get...

    I believe you just put your finger, perhaps unwittingly, on the big problem with Americans and globalization: Americans have to pay a ton for their education, putting them in debt right from the start, whereas in most of the world, the education is heavily subsidized by the government. So while the rest can get educated then move to any other country that fits their lifestyle, the educated Americans are restricted to a few wealthy countries, at least until they pay off their huge debts.

  61. Re:No Way by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

    India is not Buddhist, unfortunately.. Thankfully, though, it is a secular state -- no mixing of temple and state, if you don't know what I'm talking about.. we can talk about why I think this is still true some other time. There are pockets of insanity here and there, but that's also a bit off topic here.

  62. one apple does make a bushel by westlake · · Score: 1
    With an influx of smart westerners how long do you think India will stay a third world country? They're getting all the jobs from those western countries while the best workers from the western countries flee to India in order to have jobs. If India plays this right they could easily become a world power while the arrogant western countries slowly slide down the tubes.

    60% of Indian workers are employed in subsistence agriculture, 23% in services.

    The educated elite has gained a thin slice of the high-tech pie. But that has not translated into the kind of broad based economic development that would take the masses out of poverty.

    1. Re:one apple does make a bushel by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Not yet, but they're aggressively moving into the market. If they play things right they'll bootstrap their entire economy. This won't absolutely happen but it's obvious that they are making an effort to make it happen. It's definately something that the rest of the world should keep in mind when we're setting our policies.

      Malaysia, India, China, etc are hungry and they're entering the technical industry at a point where they can cover more ground faster for not having all the baggage that most western powers have. Sometimes it's easier to start from a clean slate than to try to improve an already working system.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  63. Ah, so it DOES work! =) by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    Haha, while everyone else has been working on increasing their skills to appeal to the remnant American market, I've been learning to develop a taste for curry-based products! India, here I come!!! ;)

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  64. Re:A Shame by Minkey+Brines · · Score: 1

    "The meaning of the word computer has changed but has always lagged behind the capabilities of machines in use at the time. The word was originally used to describe a person who performed arithmetic calculations and this usage is still valid."

    Computer operators?

  65. Re:You know by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Very good points. The problem is that capitalism hasn't got any checks and balances. People, as a whole, are to short-sighted to realize what they are doing to themselves until it is to late.

    Everyone wants cheaper stuff so companies find ways to make cheaper stuff which requires them either reduce the quality, reduce their own profit margins, or pay less to produce the same items. To some degree they do reduce the quality but that can only go so far before people don't want the items anymore. Those in charge can't reduce their profit margins because if they do they'll be removed from control of the company and someone else will be put in their place. That means they have to reduce the cost of producing the items. That means more automation and cutting back on the wages they are paying. So, to simplify, lower prices mean fewer jobs and lower wages. Sure, we can't all afford to buy a Porshe but you should think about the companies that make the products you buy when comparing products. The Walmart-economy will cut all our throats. You'll notice that they no longer mark everything at Walmart as 'Made in the USA.'. There is good reason for that. Demand more locally made products and demand that more of the companies you buy from pay fair wages to their employees. IMO it's okay if a product is made in India, if I can't get the same product made locally, but I want to know the people making that product are earning a comparable living wage to those that live in the US.

    I think the US needs to boost it's education system too. Highschool degrees have become almost worthless because highschool graduates aren't required to know anything. We don't pay our teachers enough so we don't have enough teachers and many that we do have are not that well educated. Also I think that as long as highschool degrees are worthless for getting jobs that the government should make free public colleges for getting your Bachelors degree. There should be no extra paperwork or requirements - it should be as easy as signing up to highschool. We should make it easier for everyone to get advanced degrees also.

    Without correcting those problems we're going to have our asses kicked by globalization. A lot of people think the US will always be a world power but that is just arrogance. It's all to easy to fall from greatness if you don't make an effort to maintain that position.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  66. Re:A Shame by mordors9 · · Score: 1

    The only good thing about outsourcing to India was the potential to raise the lives of Indians. It is a country of somewhere around a billion people. Many areas with abject poverty. So now we are not going to educate Indians, we are not going to hire Indians, we are not going to put all of that money into the Indian economy. Instead the only benefit to the Indians might be some small amount of increase in servicing the Euros that come to India to take those jobs on a temporary basis. Taking any high tech skills they might have learned away. Taking any money they have saved out of the economy. That really seem to be a shame.

  67. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by phatStrat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nevermind that in Canada (land of free health care plagued by long wait times), people are starting to setup surgery-tourist packages to Indian hospitals, all-expenses paid including hotel, 1-month of follow up and a tour for something stupid like $5,000.

    Apparently the hospitals that rich people in India go to are world-class and offer care at 1/10th the cost.

    So I wouldn't rule out India's health care system so quickly.

  68. It's not "reverse migration" by lxt · · Score: 1

    ...it's "migration". Migration is defined as a move from one area to another, for at least one year (anything else being classed as "other" - holiday, sabbatical, gap year etc.). There is no such thing as reverse migration.

    To say so implies that by migrating, people are moving from a poorer country to a richer one (ie, from India to the US). That's not the case at all - migrating can be forced, can be voluntary, can be from an LEDC to an MEDC, from an MEDC to an LEDC...there's no "set" rule.

    1. Re:It's not "reverse migration" by shonagon53 · · Score: 1

      "Reverse migration" is a sociological term, indicating the reversal of reasons for migration from one to another culture. A "host culture" has certain elements which attract immigrants (e.g. the West has political freedom, and great salaries). When a few of these elements in the host culture get eroded, and these same elements become attractive in the "home culture", the effect is that not only the immigrants may decide to return, but that people from the "host culture" follow them along and become immigrants themselves. It's quite a well established sociological concept.

  69. depends.... by dep01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    do the chicks there put out for white, geeky american guys? if so, then i'd consider a career in India.

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
    1. Re:depends.... by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1, Funny

      good news and bad news:

      bad news: sex only after marriage.

      good news: the father will actually pay in gold - for you to marry his daughter.

      India - love it or loathe it but never indifferent.

      mere nam Mesmeric hai

    2. Re:depends.... by 4naxnt · · Score: 2, Informative

      In general, the place is conservative. An american guy, I know worked in Hyderabad for 8 months, saved a bundle but was very frustrated in the dating department. His outlet was bi-monthly visit to Bangkok. Banglore, apparently, is a bit more progessive on this scene. But I suspect, not helluva lot.

  70. They *are* by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    No URL for it, but a local TV station (KRON 4) had a segment on the news about that last night and some of the privacy issues.

    Yes, lawyers are being outsourced. Patent law work and legal work needing engineering/technical backgrounds is being outsourced to India as well.

  71. Re:No Way by GrimReality · · Score: 1
    India is not Buddhist, unfortunately..

    But, one could forgive one for thinking so. Consider all official (state/government) motifs (the wheel, the lion's head, the motto 'Truth Alone Triumphs' etc.). They are all taken from the period of Ashoka, the king who spread Bhuddism to all the parts of the world that we think of as Bhuddist (SriLanka, parts of China etc.).

    I believe the the choice of motifs was deliberate. An attempt by the politically correct moderates who dominated the framing of Indian constitution etc., to present a secular image.

    Also, if I remember correctly, (I don't know if they took this bit out of their constitution), but India might be the only country with a constitution that explicitly gives the right to preach your religion (except in state sponsored context.). In most other constituions, it is implied under 'Freedom of Speech'. I just thought it was interesting. Funny even. Even Hilarious. (Funny because, this is very reason why Fascists are attacking minorities in India right now, and I think, for the sake of the minorities, that explicit statement should be removed, because as long as it exists, the minorities will feel the urge to preach and get screwed --and it is not funny if you are the minority.)

  72. Sibling poster is a troll. by Viceice · · Score: 1

    Ignore him.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  73. How to avoid diarrhea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Easiest way to avoid diarrhea is to cook your own, and cook it well. All you want to to is to kill bacteria and other germs in your food and water. Frying or boiling are the best ways to do this.

    Or buy something takeaway and microwave it yourself. Microwave is a little unreliable unless you have the new inverter design ones which have stepless power adjustment. Long steady sterilization does it. 1 minute on full micro power may leave cool unsterilized pockets in your food. 1 min at 100% and 2 mins at 60% is better.

    Always boil all of your water, even after buying that fancy ceramic water filter.

    All of these simple lessons I've learn the hard way over the years in many countries, including developed ones.

    If you need to eat out, take one strong aperitive before food, and one strong digestive after food. This may sound archaic to some but it really works wonders.

  74. Holland perks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


    And chilling out after work in Holland really is second to none on this planet.

  75. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by torpor · · Score: 1


    Assumption: You 'need' an 'expensive Western Education' to get anything done in life. Fact: FALSE Reason: Too much data to support the fact that "EWE"'s are, in fact, an utter waste of time.

    Assumption: Nomads freak about posessions. Fact: FALSE. Reason: If you haven't chucked it *all* away, completely, and started fresh at least 3 or 4 times, you are not a nomad. You are probably owned by your posessions, though.

    Assumption: Sick in India. Solution: There are a few million people living in India who do just fine without medical problems. Do what they do.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  76. Silver lining? Cultural opportunities by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Europeans already enjoy ready travel to other nations, speak different languages, understand other societies.

    But US citizens, famously provincial, could benefit from living and working abroad. No, you won't earn as much money, and you may find it hard to keep up with the latest pensées of Bill O'Reilly, and you'll have to learn to be tolerant and respectful of other cultures; but that seems like a decent trade-off, especially if the new migration creates better world citizens who can bring a measure of insight back to their own society.

    Probably it's too late for those in their 30s and 40s, who, having show determination to vote against their own economic interests, now face being relegated to lower-paying jobs and ultimately being forced out of the field by the very corporate interests who control their politicians. But the new generation coming along could try this. Remember, kids: buy your airline tickets before you're drafted. Better an adventure next Spring in New Delhi than in Fallujah.

    Happy Thanksgiving!

  77. Re:Numbers are too small by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    In some cases that might happen but what I think usually happens is very different.

    Case A: company has programmers overqualified for what they need done. These employees cost far more than their coworkers.
    Solution: fire overqualified workers.

    Case B: company needs highest qualified workers. These employees cost a lot. Equally qualified employees can be hired in India for 1/10th the cost. Company can force current employees to train their replacements.
    Solution: train new employees then fire existing employees.

    Case C: company has morals and keeps all it's employees and pays them well. The competition hires cheap Indian labor. The competition's profits sore, they spend more money on marketing, and everyone and their dog starts buying the cheaper and better advertised products of the competition. Your company goes out of business.
    Solution: none - again you're unemployed

    So unless you have a skill that just can't be replaced you're probably screwed by the economics of the situation. It might not happen today but unless things change it will happen eventually.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  78. For now... by Once&FutureRocketman · · Score: 1
    this is the Era Of The Nomad, in my opinion.


    That works at the moment, but that lifestyle is very much dependent on cheap energy. And while we are not actually running out of oil, we are definitely running out of cheap oil.

    --

    "Research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing." -- Wernher von Braun

  79. Correction: Re:aha.....so now...... by init-five · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, you call Dell.

    --
    Hallowed are the Ori
  80. Travel is not living there. by khasim · · Score: 1
    And I've -travelled-, not lived, in far more places than just the 4 I've mentioned ... I know parts of the world most couldn't find on a map .. so I resent your assumption that my 'attitude needs changing' ... its the root-seeders that need an attitude change, especially them white-picket-fence ones!!
    Great. That's some achievement. Particularly given that most US citizens cannot correctly fill in the states of their own country nor the nations in Europe. I'm sure Europeans would do better, but still, it's not that difficult.

    So, I've also been to places that "most couldn't find on a map". I don't think that says much about me or my viewpoint. Just my travel history.
    As for 'exploiting 3rd world countries', as soon as I'm done exploiting the so-called '1st World' ones, you can bet your ass I'll be off to Timbuktu to help them put new tech to use.
    Cute. Except you don't understand the word "exploit". :) Maybe you can find a dictionary in one of those places "most" cannot find on a map?
    What I'm talking about is the globalist point of view, not your knee-jerk reactionary tinfoil version.
    Well that's quite an achievement for you, I guess. Maybe you should bring that up to someone who has the "tinfoil" version sometime? I'm not interested in it.
    Thinking globally; changing from an introverted to extroverted view, is globalization.
    Nooooooo..... "globalization" is about the exploitation of off-shore workers. Otherwise we had "globalization" back when a British company had an office in New York, London and Hong Kong. Let's see, that would be about, oh 150 years ago.

    Congratulations, you're cutting edge 150 years too late.

    Even the Peace Corps have been doing what you're claiming since the 60's.

    The difference is that we used to IMPORT the raw materials from other countries and MANUFACTURE the finished goods here.

    Now, we setup factories in 3rd world countries and have them import the raw materials and then we import the finished goods.

    That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.
    1. Re:Travel is not living there. by kraut · · Score: 1

      >The difference is that we used to IMPORT the raw materials from other countries and MANUFACTURE the finished goods here.

      >Now, we setup factories in 3rd world countries and have them import the raw materials and then we import the finished goods.

      >That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.

      So now those poor people in foreign countries can actually have some qualified jobs in manufacturing, rather than just mining and farming like they were previously forced to? And why is that a bad thing?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    2. Re:Travel is not living there. by MacDork · · Score: 1
      >That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.

      So now those poor people in foreign countries can actually have some qualified jobs in manufacturing, rather than just mining and farming like they were previously forced to? And why is that a bad thing?

      I think you've missed his point. To maintain the standard of living we have in America, we cannot continue to carry a half trillion dollar trade deficit. We are exporting America's wealth and not a lot else. I'm sure the third world nations love this, everyone wants to live the good life. However, when it comes time to cough up $10,000 a year for AIDS drugs or $250 a copy for Windows, they suddenly don't care for this whole 'exporting intellectual property' idea anymore. They've stopped paying. We'll have to stop buying.

      When that happens, who exactly will they be manufacturing for? Why, themselves of course. They will have the jobs, the training, and the expertise.

      Of course, your answer is 'be a nomad'. Your solution falls apart when everyone wants to 'be a nomad'. You know, supply and demand, simple economics. Does America just let any Indian come to work here? Consider the situation reversed and you'll see your answer is "Let them eat cake."

      The debate isn't about exporting jobs. It's about exporting wealth. Jobs are just a part of that.

    3. Re:Travel is not living there. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Nooooooo..... "globalization" is about the exploitation of off-shore workers.

      "When I say a word, it means what I choose it to mean" -Humpty Dumpty.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  81. Not stronger by cyberformer · · Score: 1

    Americans often seem to have a stronger sense of family than other cultures *because* they live so far apart. Holidays like Thanksgiving are the only chance may people get to see their families, so people need to pack a whole year's worth of family time into a weekend.

    But if you lived in a country where people could spend time with their families every day, spending time with your family wouldn't seem like that big a deal. You don't miss them till they're gone.

  82. Look up "nationalization". by khasim · · Score: 1
    Fatalism? Democracy? Aren't they one and the same?
    Hardly. Fatalism is a philosophical school. Democracy is a political system.
    Nationalist pride in 'systems' are irrelevant when multi-national corps can demolish an entire economic system in a moments bank-wire ..
    The corps only have as much influence as the local governments allow them. In the past, many governments have "nationalized" industries to deal with that and other problems.
    The New World Order is upon us. The only thing we can do about it is construct another one, right on top of it.
    Whatever. There has always been a "World Order". The only things that have changed have been who's on top and how fast and easily we can move money and material.

    Cash now flows faster and easier than workers do. Before, it took the same effort for a person to go from London to New York as it did to send cash from London to New York.

    In order to equalize it, you can remove restrictions on people moving and living where they want to or slow down the transfer of cash.
    1. Re:Look up "nationalization". by kraut · · Score: 1

      >The corps only have as much influence as the local governments allow them.
      And, of course, the customers. Don't like what shell / nestle / smithkline are doing? Don't buy their products, and organise a boycott - heck, it works.
      Corporations do not exist as evil tools of world domination, even if it sometimes looks that way. They exist to make money for their shareholders, and they depend on customers to do that.

      >In the past, many governments have "nationalized" industries to deal with that and other problems.
      And, AFAIK, nationalisation has always and everywhere been an abject failure. I hope there is a counterexample, but I haven't found one yet.

      > Cash now flows faster and easier than workers do....In order to equalize it, you can remove restrictions on people moving and living where they want to or slow down the transfer of cash.

      Slow down the movement of money? Not in the real world. Have a look at the transaction volume of the FX market; any country that seriously impeded that would simply be routed around, to use that famous internet metaphor, and wither.

      I'd be all for removing restrictions on the movement of people, though. "Economic Migrant" is such a nasty term these days; people forget that e.g. the U.S. was mainly populated by these nasty economic migrants that we want to shut out so badly.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  83. Re:pay? by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of the jobs I've seen there were between US$2-$5/hr which sucks until you've been downsized here in the US and you're unemployment runs out. You could work for $5.75/hr or whatever minimum wage is here and be unable to pay for a house and food or you could move to India and work for a similar wage and have a house and food given to you. My rent for a small one bedroom apartment in Las Vegas is $1000/month. Having a comparable place for free would make the rest of my money go a lot further.

    I'd be curious is to the quality of housing and food they have. My apartment is expensive IMO but it really isn't very nice. The buildings are cheap and probably don't even meet the legal standards of saftey. There isn't much space. Short of dirt floors and lots of bugs I doubt that the free places in India could be much worse.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  84. Move to the US by leereyno · · Score: 1

    Move to the US. Here even the highest tax bracket is less than half of what you're paying in Demnark.

    You clearly have a strong grasp of the english language, which is the only real thing that America requires of anyone to be accepted.

    I'm shocked at the tax rate you have to pay in Denmark, but not suprised. Socialism is just another form of communism. Communism is a philosophy founded upon the insane belief that because some people are able to rise to greater socio-economic heights than others, that everyone must be forcibly kept at the same level. This is their idea of "equality." In truth it doesn't work, even if it were somehow a good idea, which it isn't. Instead what happens is that those who enforce this "equality" set themselves up so that they are above the system. Party elites in the Soviet Union had special stores where they could buy things, including items from the west that your average Russian would likely never lay eyes on, let alone possess.

    Socialism does not try to prevent those with greater ability, effort, or dumb luck, from getting ahead per-se. Instead it simply extorts the fruits of their labor from them and uses it to support those who are more lacking in ability, effort, and dumb luck.

    Both systems attempt to homogenize a nation's wealth, which is ultimately destructive. It is far better to work to maximize the opportunity for each person to rise to greater heights. Those who have the ability and inclination will do so. Those who lack these qualities aren't worth a plug nickle anyway. The only danger that exists is the ultimate formation of an plutocracy, which is what the US suffers from to some extent.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:Move to the US by amorsen · · Score: 1
      As a fellow dane i wouldn't mind him/her moving to the states, one less "I want it all and I give a crap about the rest" kind of ppl here.

      As another fellow Dane I support you completely. Besides, so what if the marginal tax is 62%? If you reach that tax bracket you're pretty well off. And if you become sick and unable to work, you know that you will never be without health care, a roof over your head, and food on the table. In a system with privatized health care, the health insurers will try to dump you when you get sick. Do you have the strength to fight a court battle when you are ill? And even if your health insurance doesn't screw you, will you have the money needed to send your children off to university if you are too ill to work?

      In the US, you live in constant financial danger, because noone will be there for you when you need it. Therefore it's important to work as hard as you can to save up. Since money is needed for basic survival, taxes in the US are seen as the government causing a risk for your basic survival. It is no wonder that Americans complain so much about taxes.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:Move to the US by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      Normally i dont respond to AC's but I'll make an exception.

      "You immediately start ranting about communism/socialism and how it doesnt work. I wouldn't characterise the danish system as communism, though im sure some americans would :). However it doesn't really matter what you call it, the danish system does work. Denmark is one of the richest countries in the world, have some of the highest living standards, hardly any poor ppl, 100% literacy, free healthcare, free education and a good economy."

      Healthcare is not free. Neither is education, or any of the other things you seem to take for granted. What you call "free" is paid in the extreme level of taxation in my previous post. Paid to a system where you are robbed of choice, and told to accept what you get (the quality of the various welfare services are btw, at best, mediocre).

      Denmark is not communist in the sense of Marx's original thesis, but it certainly is nearly communist if you take a look at a Lorentz-curve for Denmark, and if you consider how little control you have of your own privately earned funds.

      You can always claim that the system "works", and if you completely disregard the quality of the output, plus the negative impact on personl freedoms, you're right.

      However, I am NOT prepared to blindly accept that I have essentially become a wageslave for the state.

    3. Re:Move to the US by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      "As a fellow dane i wouldn't mind him/her moving to the states, one less "I want it all and I give a crap about the rest" kind of ppl here.

      As another fellow Dane I support you completely. Besides, so what if the marginal tax is 62%? If you reach that tax bracket you're pretty well off."

      Ah, the old "you have enough $$$ already, hand 'em over".

      Sorry, my being "well off" is NOT an excuse for you to confiscate my property.

      " And if you become sick and unable to work, you know that you will never be without health care, a roof over your head, and food on the table."

      Have you ever heard of private health insurance? It can even be had in Denmark for less than 1000US$/yr.

      " In a system with privatized health care, the health insurers will try to dump you when you get sick."

      So may, and then they will have to face the courts. And the marketplace.

      Spare us the scaremongering, please.

      " Do you have the strength to fight a court battle when you are ill?"

      Oh, lots of people have to do that already in the current systems on both DK and USA.

      " And even if your health insurance doesn't screw you, will you have the money needed to send your children off to university if you are too ill to work?"

      It's inconcieveable to you that

      1) you kids may not WANT an Univ education?
      2) the kids can provide for themselves?

      "In the US, you live in constant financial danger, because noone will be there for you when you need it. "

      You're ignorant. The USA spends more money per capita on public healtcare than even the Danish system does.

      "Therefore it's important to work as hard as you can to save up. Since money is needed for basic survival, taxes in the US are seen as the government causing a risk for your basic survival. It is no wonder that Americans complain so much about taxes."

      Perhaps because taxes are also robbery, whether your language is Danish and English.

    4. Re:Move to the US by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      "You clearly have a strong grasp of the english language, which is the only real thing that America requires of anyone to be accepted."

      Thank you Lee. I have already considered either Montana or New Hampshire.

      "I'm shocked at the tax rate you have to pay in Denmark, but not suprised. Socialism is just another form of communism. Communism is a philosophy founded upon the insane belief that because some people are able to rise to greater socio-economic heights than others, that everyone must be forcibly kept at the same level."

      True, but a more basic premise of the various forms of collectivism (which both socialism and communism is) is that the individual does not own himself or the fruits of his labor, and that the individual that acts in his own best interest does so on the basis of harming other. Neither of these assumptions are correct.

      " This is their idea of "equality." In truth it doesn't work, even if it were somehow a good idea, which it isn't. Instead what happens is that those who enforce this "equality" set themselves up so that they are above the system. Party elites in the Soviet Union had special stores where they could buy things, including items from the west that your average Russian would likely never lay eyes on, let alone possess.

      Socialism does not try to prevent those with greater ability, effort, or dumb luck, from getting ahead per-se. Instead it simply extorts the fruits of their labor from them and uses it to support those who are more lacking in ability, effort, and dumb luck."

      That is, in practise, the same as prevention of ability. When you rob a person of the outcome of his work, you rob his will to work. Pretty simple, actually.

      "Both systems attempt to homogenize a nation's wealth, which is ultimately destructive. It is far better to work to maximize the opportunity for each person to rise to greater heights. Those who have the ability and inclination will do so. Those who lack these qualities aren't worth a plug nickle anyway. The only danger that exists is the ultimate formation of an plutocracy, which is what the US suffers from to some extent.

      Lee"

      Read mises.org. The problem in the US is what Nader correctly calls "Corporate socialism". Not that i agree with the guy on most issues, thoigh.

    5. Re:Move to the US by amorsen · · Score: 1
      The USA spends more money per capita on public healtcare than even the Danish system does.

      Yes, in fact it spends about twice as much. Despite that it doesn't even offer universal health care, and health outcomes are average for an industrialized nation (among those covered, of course). Not particularly impressive.

      Perhaps because taxes are also robbery, whether your language is Danish and English.

      No, taxes are taxes. Next you'll be telling me that prison is kidnapping. There is a large majority in favour of taxes in Denmark. You may not like that, but it is a simple fact, and using emotional language does not change it. In a democracy the majority can force a minority to play along. (Subject to some constraints, which include certain protections for minorities -- because a majority has decided that such protections are a good idea.)

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  85. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Having the government pay for it isn't "free". It merely shifts the payer to the taxpayer, instead of the student. Americans have always had the option of a few years of military service to finance a college education, and indeed generations of working class elevated themselves to middle class in this fashion. For those who would never dream of firing a gun in this lifetime, student loans are readily availible.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  86. Re:Free snacks!?!?!?! by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

    with 2/3 companies I've gotten options from, they are.

    I've gotten far more value in free lunches at my current job than in stock in my previous...

  87. Interesting by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    Actually it is quite similar in Oil and Gas industry for those stationed in the middle east (and Russia if I remember). There is a secure compond for foreign workers (school and everything is there). Everybody speaks English and the security is better within the compound than it is in some places in the US. Outside the compounds of course, you may require an armed escort should you need to go to certain places.

    I think people underestimate the ability to raise a family under such circumstances (army or otherwise). Yes, it can be diffucult. Impossible? No. If you cannot deal with the local language and culture requirements, it isn't likely you'd be selected for the job in any case. Working overseas or in a job requiring extensive global travel isn't for everyone (I myself would not choose the nomadic life, although I'd relocate if required), but I forsee it becomeing much more commonplace in the future.

  88. Re:A Shame by GuyZero · · Score: 1

    Ah, US Thanksgiving, when generations come together... on Slashdot.

  89. Americans are taught the media to be fatalistic by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    The media has pounded into the heads of Americans that resistance to globalization is futile.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  90. you rightwing bots have been saying that for years by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    That the European welfare states are collapsing-- but they just keep plugging along. Gee, I wonder if the corporatist-imperialist state of America will have to declare war on them if Americans finally catch on. And that happens ol' Cryofan will be here in America--fighting for Europe!

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  91. I call BS re India health-care; true horror story by nusratt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A well-off USA-resident Indian sysadmin friend of mine, when back in India briefly two years ago (either ND or Mumbai), had to deal with obtaining proper medical care for her middle-class (or better) India-resident father.

    He needed non-emergency corrective surgery related to a broken leg.
    I can accept that the surgeons insisted on being paid cash, in advance.

    But the hospital required that *she* personally make the trips between the hospital and the blood-bank to obtain and transport the (NOT rare) blood needed for his surgery.

    I'll pass, thank you.

  92. Reverse Migration ... by subVorkian · · Score: 1

    ... is a misnomer. Migration is migration is migration. "Reverse" migration strikes me as condescending and bigoted (ok I am setting myself for a flaming -- I used the "b" word). I admit, I am being semantic, but isn't the movement of people to other countries, always known as migration? Why the need to qualify it by saying it's reverse migration?

  93. Re:Welcome to Kwik-E-Doc! by Guillermito · · Score: 1
    Yet the movies still have a problem showing a man even kissing a woman

    What about movies showing a woman kissing another woman. Are they ok? That should make Indian cinema interesting.

  94. 2 models for nomad execs of the 21st century by becca333 · · Score: 1

    There are 2 models in play for nomads of the 21st century. Take off to different country and work for local currency. Or live in the third world and contract out your services to first world countries. Either way you can live like a king. The second option is better because you can actually save money. hook up with one of the many language schools to learn the language or better deal with the transition abroad. Here's one of the better ones
    http://www.firststepworld.com/

  95. What small company? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You act like there is a lot of new small companies forming and that our economy has more than enough jobs for every American. What country have you been living in the past few years? Did you not notice the jobs moving to India during the recession? When theres not enough jobs, you move to the jobs.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  96. Re:you rightwing bots have been saying that for ye by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That the European welfare states are collapsing-- but they just keep plugging along.

    But not as well as Britain after Britain made their economy more market-oriented.

  97. She'll be right boss by goon · · Score: 1
    '... I've worked in the U.S., Japan, and now Germany. In a few years time, I hope to move to India to work for a little while, then head back to Australia to do what I can to build up the national market for technology ...'

    to non-aus (with exception to kiwis and other antipodeans) this comment reflects reality for a number of reasons.

    Firstly for any scientific or technical work one of ways to get any recognition back home is to work overseas in a foreign company. It is a dilemma that faces many in country where business is timid clubby and insular and mono cultural. It is also a chance to get some $$$ in a country where pay for workers relatively to business exe s is pretty poor. Flame away ...

    Pria Viswalingam did a great doco, 'She'll be right boss' highlighting this problem.

    '... then head back to Australia to do what I can to build up the national market for technology ..'

    highlighting another problem(s) that exist - complete apathy in recognising the skills these people typically bring back (inside knowledge) and lack of interest by the business and political heads of the need to build a environment suitable for success.

    Global markets will smash australian business that fail to adapt to the upcoming competitors. So new blood, tempered with international experience is *needed* back into aus.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  98. Re:Reverse Migration analogous reverse osmosis by ya8282 · · Score: 1

    I think the quote takes into consideration that outsourcing work is usually done by other countries into India because of the lower cost. There is a higher concentration of outsourced employees in India than Europe. Also, a greater number of Indians leave their country to pursue technology jobs outside of their country than Europeans. Therefore, it is a combination of outsourcing to the people of countries that usually outsource the work and migration of workers from an environment of lower outsourced concentration to greater outsourced concentration. I don't see any bigotry here, but I guess this kind of issue is subjective.

  99. Re:RTFA! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    I don't see any numbers, and what one person considers "mediocre" is variable enough in itself to be almost no information at all. Almost as little information as your comment just now, in fact.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  100. It's called "exploitation". by khasim · · Score: 1
    So now those poor people in foreign countries can actually have some qualified jobs in manufacturing, rather than just mining and farming like they were previously forced to? And why is that a bad thing?
    Because they don't have the worker and environmental protections that we in the 1st world have.

    Do I have to remind you of Kathy Lee Gifford's little episode with child labour?
    1. Re:It's called "exploitation". by kraut · · Score: 1

      If you're lobbying for workers' rights in the 3rd world, and right to union representation, I'm right behind you.

      But the parent poster only wanted to protect the jobs in his backyard :
      >That's not a good idea if you want to maintain the standard of living of your population.
      and I object to that hypocrisy.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    2. Re:It's called "exploitation". by jcr · · Score: 1

      Because they don't have the worker and environmental protections that we in the 1st world have.

      Neither did we, until our productivity enabled us to worry about things beyond subsistence.

      If you want the third world to institute environmental laws, then you should be encouraging their economic development as much as possible.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  101. Re:I'm a Norwegian troll ... by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    I toured Scandinavia shortly after graduating college, and was shocked to hear a Norwegian grad student was not only not paying for school, but actually getting a small stipend to live off while he continued his education. The American situation is, however only a "problem" for individual young Americans. From the perspective of American companies, corps and gov't; keeping talent local is a good thing.

  102. Re:A Shame by DissidentHere · · Score: 1

    I agree. I work in the US, but am a project manager working with a team of developers in India. I have found that:
    1) members of the team are very skilled and intelligent
    2) members of the team have excellent communication skills
    3) members of the team are very personable and easy to work with
    4) members of the team are very motivated, hard working, committed to the projects and to providing a quality product.

    This is not to say there have not been some frustrations, but these have proved easy to overcome. Timing is frequently an issue, but this is resolved by my getting up a bit earlier (between 5 and 6) and the team working a bit later (8 or 9). It took me about 3 weeks to get very comfortable with the accent, though IM has been a great way to communicate too.

    At first, I was worried, as I was a coder for a small company that was acquired by a large company that does a lot of outsorcing. Turns out I transitioned in to project/product management, and I enjoy it more and am much better at it. My point is that global outsourcing can be good. My new position is more fun with better pay.

    --
    "None of us are as dumb as all of us." - meeting mantra
  103. OT US healthcare by khallow · · Score: 1

    There's a lot wrong with US healthcare and health insurance, but insurance companies aren't responsible for high medical costs. That aspect runs counter to the interests of the health insurance companies. After all, they're the ones who actually pay most medical bills. My point here is that you also need to consider the other parties raising the cost of healthcare - the providers and patients.

    1. Re:OT US healthcare by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Insurance companies are definitely responsible for the out of control healthcare costs in the USA:

      Health Insurance - seperates responsibility for the bills from responsibility for the results. Thus you get patients who insist on all kinds of expensive tests and procedures because, from their perspective, "it's all free anyway." People who must pay for their own medical treatment personally understand the costs involved and thus make much more rational decisions about trade-offs between costs and results.

      Actual "health insurance" ought to be limited to catastrophic insurance only, where it follows the original concept of insurance to mitigate the risk of catastrophe rendering the patient unable to pay for the rare big-bucks treatement that is necessary for the patients very survival.

      Malpractice Insurance - These guys provide the deep pockets that make suing doctors and hospitals for malpractice so attractive. If their deep pockets weren't there such that a malpractice judgement might actually bankrupt a doctor or hospital (and thus result in little to no actual money being paid out) then there would be a whole lot less malpractice suits in the first place, and probably a whole lot more accountability within the medical profession as well because they would no longer have the shield that insurance provides them.

      As an alternative to malpractice insurance, each patient should buy "operation insurance," kind of like flight insurance. The cost for coverage would vary by factors such as the type of oepration, the surgeon's experience, the surgeon's history of success and failure, etc. The point being to take the fortune-hunting, deep-pockets attitude out of the system and replace it with something that is actually based on the risk of real complications and attempts to mitigate those risks as insurance was originally designed to do.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:OT US healthcare by khallow · · Score: 1
      Ok, that's much better.

      I still don't buy it. Insurance companies don't shield the careers of medical practictioners. They don't force companies to purchase insurance that covers routine care, cosmetic surgery, or experimental proceedures. And insurance companies certainly aren't responsible for the litigious environment of modern healthcare.

    3. Re:OT US healthcare by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      > Insurance companies don't shield the careers of medical practictioners.

      Yes they do, I'm too lazy to dig up examples of first order shielding of specific doctors, but second order shielding is easy to see because they enable the typical corporate distribution of responsibility so that systemic failures are "no one's fault." Thus the groups making the decisions that ultimately result in systemic failures don't get overhauled and bad processes either continue or are replaced by new bad processes designed by the same people responsible for the original bad processes.

      > They don't force companies to purchase insurance that covers
      > routine care, cosmetic surgery, or experimental proceedures.

      The insurance lobby is one of the strongest proponents of federally-mandated health insurance for employers over a certain size (I think it is 25 employees).

      > And insurance companies certainly aren't responsible
      > for the litigious environment of modern healthcare.

      Like I said before, they provide the incentive by enabling the "deep pockets" attitude. It is a reciprocal system where they like the current litigious environment because it allows them to justify ever increasing rates - when your profit is effectively a percentage of the money that passes through your hands, that means more dollars for them the more lawsuits they pay out on. But, what's worse is that even in states where litigation is not ridiculous they still use it as justification for rate hikes.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:OT US healthcare by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ok, you make a good case particularly in the example of federally-mandated health insurance. I think you're letting the many other members of this debacle slide.

    5. Re:OT US healthcare by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Certainly they are not alone in creating the situation, but they are an easy target to pick out and their role in creating/maintaing the current problems is key. Whether they are an easy target for legislative change in the USA is whole different question - that big lobby of their's and all.

      But, at the very least, if India is smart enough they won't let the health insurance industry develop over there the way it has over here, thus avoiding our current set of problems.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  104. Re:I see you wouldnt make a good father. by 808140 · · Score: 1

    I think your ad homniem attack on the GP is in poor taste. I grew up in a family that moved around; I was raised on two continents and now live on a third. Being moved around as a child was hard, but I think that frankly I've lived a lot more than most people my age, and with experience comes maturity, common sense and open-mindedness. There were times when I hated my parents for their dynamic lifestyles -- but as I understand it, non-mobile kids hate their parents for forcing them to do things they don't want to do too, like cleaning their room or not wearing that dress to the prom, or whatever.

    Now, I'm 25, I speak 4 languages fluently and am conversant in 6, am a citizen of no less than three different countries and have lived and worked all over the world. I'd love to take credit for these accomplishments, but who am I kidding? My parents did that for me, and its opened more doors for me than a xenophobic monoglot could possibly imagine. If that's bad parenting, man, I'd sure like to see good!

    As for taking care of the elderly, I agree that this is sometimes necessary -- but only when the elderly are incapable of taking care of themselves. Assuming that just because someone is in their 80s they can't live on their own is agist and my grandfather, at least, would resent it.

  105. Re:Different struggles by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Housing isn't so terrible over in India. I know of someone over there who has a 2 bedroom apartment to themself. I forgot how much it cost exactly, but it was just about 1/3 of what they brought home each month. Sounds a bit pricy at first, but not that different from what the rent is in the US for many cities.

    Cars are a different matter. My old Nissan is worth about $1000 here in the states. If that same car was over in India, it would be worth... about $1000. The difference is, over there $1000 is a lot of money! Atleast in the US when you spend a significant portion of your income on a car, you'll probably get something fairly new and [hopefully] reliable.

  106. I agree. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    (IAAIndian and all that) and we've been tracking reports of this type on blogsphere for over a year now. The overwhelming consensus is that it's great that the tourism industry is picking up in India.

    That said, there is a definite surge in ex-pat hiring in a different sphere altogether; at a managerial level, to be precise. Many Indian companies are about to venture out of the traditionally-protectionist Indian market, and are finding themselves without the necessary managerial experience to survive in the global market.

    Non-Indian /.-tters looking to work in India would be better off looking at PHB positions; you get all those cool perks (maid, driver, bungalow, club-memberships etc) AND international-level salaries. Indian software co's seem to be exclusively focussing on fresh grads, a demographic whose supply seems endless currently.

  107. Underinformed... by TheLink · · Score: 1

    "Actually in Malaysia only muslims have to follow sharia so if you aren't muslim you can do what you like...although finding alchohol or porn could be tricky.

    I wouldn't move to even a relatively moderate muslim country like malayasia though. In a country of hundreds of millions theres bound to be more than a couple islamo-kooks looking to blow up westerners."

    I'm in Malaysia. Finding alcohol is definitely not tricky, in fact beer's pretty cheap here considering it is a muslim country. Of course beer might not count as alcohol to some people (concentration is quite low). But you can all sorts of alcoholic drinks at bars, nightclubs, most restaurants, 7/11s, supermarts etc. Plenty of choices. You can get stout for about USD1.50 to USD3.00 depending on where you go.

    Finding porn tricky? Erm there's this thing called the Internet and spam sure gets here too. Avoiding porn has got to be trickier than finding porn...

    Malaysia only has 20+ million people. IIRC in the US there were more than a couple of "islamo-kooks" who blew up more than a few westerners.

    --
  108. Re:A Shame by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    While I agree with your reasoning, I disagree on the conclusion; you really want to take a look at the numbers involved. We're not looking at damming the Colorado River here, it's more like trying to chlorinate Tuscon's water supply! :-)

    In essence, I think it's good that Indian workplaces are beginning to open up to other cultures, and I certainly think the Indian job market is big enough to handle a few international applicants.

  109. Oops, my bad... by MacDork · · Score: 1

    You never once mentioned America, and now you will destroy my assertion based on that. You are what you eat and I loaded up on turkey today... :-)

  110. more like vacation than migration... by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    All of these people sign on for a year, and although some of them are extending their stays, I don't think many of them are planning to permanently put roots down in India.

    This is just a working holiday, the modern equivalent of backpacking and English teaching your way through Asia...

  111. Re:Different struggles by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    Atleast in the US when you spend a significant portion of your income on a car, you'll probably get something fairly new and [hopefully] reliable.
    Oh, the car market is booming in India lately. We're building (or trying to build) some heavy-duty highways across the country, so all those noveau-riche types need something to spend on.
  112. horrible lies! by earthstar · · Score: 1
    YOu guys lie like anything !!!! WTFYOu say everyone had diarrhoea ! My ass!
    Utter crap!

    Jus as some one in USA or anywhere else gets diarrhoea, so do people in India or anyother counter.Iam an Indian too and I live in India. .

    May be you arent patriotic,but stop with that.You dont need to throw huge lies like that to show your liking for USA.

  113. Re:I'm an Australian troll ... by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I know a guy who did that. It cost less to buy a ticket, go to india, get work done then to have it done here. He needed orthodonture (sp?) and his insurance didn't cover it.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  114. Re:I see you wouldnt make a good father. by 808140 · · Score: 1

    Well, in my grandfather's case, he lives in a country that is rather generous with social security; and sound investment decisions when he was younger mean that he would probably live well even without these aids. He's French.

    For poor Americans that won't get much help from Social Security, even though they probably paid into it for most of their lives, I agree, financial aid is necessary. But then, you don't need to live with your grandparents to support them financially, do you?

    Understand that I'm not against your general view: that children should help parents. I think that's fair; as was mentioned previously, they take care of you when you can't take care of yourself, and you take care of them when they can't take care of themselves -- and throughout your lives, you help each other.

    But understand that there are many ways to satisfy these laudable goals.

  115. India has relatively few Buddhists by dieresis · · Score: 1

    Buddhism originated in India, but basically disappeared from the culture until recently. These days most converts to Buddhism are dalits (former untouchables) seeking to break with traditional caste-based religious practices.

  116. Leaving US for retirement by heroine · · Score: 1

    Not sure if working in India is going to be as decent as Wallmart or Burger King, but for retirement you'll definitely be better off leaving US. With taxes expected to double or triple in 30 years, no-one with any brain cells is going to retire here.

  117. Re:Have you actually been to India? by Razor's+Edge · · Score: 1

    Say, Coward... I suppose if you actually knew how to read, then you'd be smart enough to see that I didn't compare Manhattan to India. Go back to sleep in that aforementioned hole that you yourself obviously live in! Ignorance is bliss, ain't it!? Or in terms that I'm sure even you can understand... No brain, no pain! Splendid!