Slashdot Mirror


Penn State Tells Students To Ditch IE

Hoyceman writes "About 80,000 students and staff are being told to use an alternate browser. The Penn State ITS department sent the alert 'because the threats are real and alternatives exist to mitigate Web browser vulnerabilities.' InformationWeek is carrying the story."

486 comments

  1. About time by eneville · · Score: 5, Funny

    The students finally get an education.

    1. Re:About time by OffTheLip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      College is a time of rebellion against the 'machine' and power to the people. If ever there was a more benign grassroots movement than open source and 'in your face' smackdown to corporate control suitable to todays US times I can't imagine.

    2. Re:About time by eneville · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well I recently finished a BSc (Hons) Computing, after 6 years of computing study (various different computing courses), so I'm in a good position to add coment here.

      The college students don't give a hoot as to what they are running, so long as they can screw it up. Remember the GNVQ Computer Studies reboot technicians can do little else than delete files. The Art students don't care if it says "Internet Explorer" or "Mozilla FireFox" at the window title, just so long as they can access hotmail.

      The college administrator will not have to worry so often that something has screwed around with the network because the MS product is faulty.

      How exactly do you remove IE from Windows without breaking their support agreement?

    3. Re:About time by Blamemyparents · · Score: 1, Informative

      The product design kids, like myself, do care, unlike the other art kids. Mainly because we're well aware that IE is a badly designed product. =)

    4. Re:About time by eneville · · Score: 1

      Perhaps my comments were not fair. However, you don't have to maintain a network of IE related products. I think IE is one of MS's more stable products, unlike Word and Access, which can have a tendancy to crash more.

      I expect they have orderes the snipers to take me out already, they have the money to do things like that you know.

    5. Re:About time by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What the hell sort of pussy college are YOU going to?

      All I can see is a soul crushing workload, at least the same amount of homework as you have class; probably more if you're not 100% effective, and saying to your buddies "sorry, I can't go out drinking tonight, I have to finish these EE questions".

      Rebellion? Who has the time?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    6. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're a troll, right? You have posted over 1700 comments on Slashdot; you have a web site Powerusrs Gaming with descriptions such as:
      "The world is a hell of darkness and death, where the dread force of destruction known as the farbtontier slowly destroy the human race in pursuit of their corrupted ideals,"
      of your own games that remind me of Ravenskull from the early '80s; you write journal entries with comments including:
      "I have merely seen more than most people will see in their lifetimes. I've seen more places and met more people, and pretty much have people figured out...but it's the people frightened by me who intruige me,"
      and I'd have just posted the first sentence if the typo in the second didn't make the whole rant more welcoming to ridicule than it is already.

      Then you complain about lack of time due to your not attending a "pussy college" and having to "finish these EE questions".

      Slashdotters like you entertain me. If I could donate money to some fund to keep people like you making fools of yourselves, I would.

    7. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EE

      There's the difference. The OP probably wasn't smart enough to go into EE, and so he went into business or some liberal art.

    8. Re:About time by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      You're a troll, right?

      The irony is killing me.

      That and the fact that the passage of time appears to mean nothing to you. Yes, I wrote powerusrs gaming(even though it hasn't been updated in over six months), worked on two RPGs written in a long dead programming language, and wrote all the journal entries in the time that I've been in college. Yep. Never done anything else, I've lived my entire life in college.

      I think we should create some sort of organization for people to whom the phrase "delta-t" means nothing.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:About time by hutchy · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think your pretty arrogant, and you wasted 6 years of your time. I would put you in the category of DOLT.

    10. Re:About time by mr_jrt · · Score: 1

      Delta-t will forever make me smile thanks to the dimwit whose code I saw with a comment along the lines of: // Delta t? I don't know what this is
      #define delta_t 1

      Luckily I wasn't working in THAT group...hehehe.

      --
      Boo.
    11. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, what's interesting, however, is that I was in one of the computer labs on Tuesday, and ITS still had Internet Explorer as the default browser on some two thousand lab computers at University Park. They couldn't have changed it over in one day. In addition, since ITS does only cover University Park, half of those 80,000 students at Commonwealth campuses will still use IE. This is a welcome decision, but ITS needs to back it up with words by installing Firefox on its public computers, and encourage the computer services departments at the other 21 campuses to do the same.

    12. Re:About time by bsartist · · Score: 1

      College is a time of rebellion

      Yeah, it's a time of being a non-conformist - just like everyone else around you.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    13. Re:About time by deaddrunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stable maybe, but Word and Access don't invisibly download spyware et al.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    14. Re:About time by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Therefore you try to be different in a different way. I suggest coming up with clever ways of making fun of other people's rebellion attempts. I saw, written on an old desk, the phrase "Your posessions own you". Right beneath it was something written by someone else who pointed out that if your posessions own you, that makes you their posession, therefore you own them, therefore DAMN RECURSIVE [stack overflow].

    15. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the "Some not" article link (where the author desribes vulnerabilities that have not been patched for IE) describes the popup injection attack as being IE-specific, even though both http://www.securityfocus.com/bid and http://www.secunia.com/ have reported this vulnerability for *all* browsers. This blatant misrepresentation of facts decreases the credibility of the author significantly.

    16. Re:About time by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

      Delta_t ... isn't that some kind of frat? I understand the whole EE majojr thing; my roomate is one and he stays up to all hours studying. Now is exam time and he fell asleep at the wheel from this crap. Not really the course's fault... he's just bad at studying/staying awake. He's fine though. Back on the subject: The culture here makes little time for recreation except on Wed from 1500-1950, Fri from 1800-0100, Sat from 0500-0100, and Sun from 0900-1950. Most children stay in and do work... and even the liberal arts kids are pretty smart compared to other schools. And before you speak ill... we have a top rated EE and CE department. However my own CSCI department isn't even on the charts though we have some bright minds. Most of the CSCI kids "liked computers" and wanted to be in the Air-Force or some such. The Air Force and other servicies like kids who "know" CSCI.

    17. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think your pretty arrogant

      "you're".

    18. Re:About time by kwalablu · · Score: 1

      Not yet, at least

  2. Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was there, Penn State's IT group was rather inept. Glad they're starting to take security and computing infrastructure seriously. Good job guys!

    1. Re:Nice! by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they understand how to detect Internet Explorer server-side and further encourage relunctant students to switch.

      Eric
    2. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    3. Re:Nice! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      The odds that you haven't actually encountered problems, compared to the chance that you've encountered problems but don't know it yet, are slim.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    4. Re:Nice! by aventius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Penn State's IT department is definitely NOT inept. I was there from 1999-2003 and I was always impressed with their implementations, policies, security, and interest in encouraging new technologies. Hell, all Computer Science grad students are given Apple Powerbooks with VirtualPC and Windows. Penn State was one of the first to give their students free Napster service in order to circumvent the RIAA bullshit. Even as a Mechanical Engineering student, I had access to Windows, Macs, Suns, and Linux boxes. I had FTP-able storage that I could access from Lab computers and from my apartment. They may not be the best, but from comparisons I've made between them and other Tier 1 schools that I've visited or attended, they are above average.

      --
      [insert lame joke here]
    5. Re:Nice! by westlake · · Score: 1
      This site best viewed with Internet Explorer 6 or Netscape 6.1 or higher. Macromedia Flash Player 5.0 or higher is required to view the scrolling announcements.Welcome to Penn State New Kensington (Updated December 10, 2004)

      I would like to see a link to a PSU site on this story. Google can be too much like an echo chamber. You never get to the primary source. Searching through the PSU Portal yields only relatively bland pronouncements like this: "ITS highly recommends using one of the alternate browsers listed below for routine Web browsing." Security Problem with Microsoft Internet Explorer Web Browser (Updated July 12, 2004)

    6. Re:Nice! by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Before I got a job at the Current College I work for I worked for one of Penn State's Satellite Campuses.

      The IT director that works there is a good friend of mine. when he took the IT position I helped him out for awile and eventually worked there while I was still in college.

      Security was priority one there. We didn't screw around when it came to protection of the network. We also understood that our PC's had to be rock solid since they had direct static IP connections to the internet.

      Virus wise, I can remember one machine in the 2 years I was there getting infected once we took over, and it was a machine that was setup before we showed up and was so mission critical that PSU main did not let us touch it until we forced them to let us take it over. Hacking wise the only problem we had was outside the network with a particular virus spamming the JetDirect cards with garbled data sothat they would print constantly, which we soon fixed with firmware updates, and this is coming from a place that ran Windows 2000 2 weeks after it went RTM.

      Security is only as good as the initial setup of the lab PC. If it is set up correctly no virus can infect it. Basicially you have to handle protection similar to a layer system. that way if the browser protections are compromised then the virus scanner takes over, all the way to user access and the os core itself. Frankly. I can guarantee that the reason their sending that to the students is because it's easier to tell them to switch to something that the spyware people haven't directly targeted yet then give them a five page lesson it how to secure their OS.

      MS isn't blame free on this. The best thing on earth that could ever happen to IE is that they lose the Eolas Case, Cause thats the reason their in this hole in the first place. 90% of the exploits in IE occur becuase of their stupid ActiveX plugin automatic download and install garbage that they developed to beat Java. If ActiveX install went away IE would be as secure as any other browser out there. MS knows it and and they know they screwed up and could fix it by removing activeX altogether and replacing it with something that makes some sense, but they will never do that cause they dont want Sun to start pointing the finger saying "see I told you so" or have millions of ActiveX programmers drive to redmond with their pitchforks and torches looking for blood.

    7. Re:Nice! by arcanis · · Score: 1

      Computer science *teaching assistants* are given the laptops. The CSE IT folks take the laptops away when you become a research assistant.

    8. Re:Nice! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Penn State was one of the first to give their students free Napster service in order to circumvent the RIAA bullshit."

      Um....as I recall it wasn't free. There was a mandatory fee that was tacked on to every students tuition whether they used the service or not.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:Nice! by truesaer · · Score: 1

      And futhermore, Napster now IS the RIAA Bullshit. "Free" Napster usually means you can only stream or listen on a couple of computers, and no burned discs or transfers to portable devices. Lame.

    10. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually...you can listen for free, for about 99 cents per song you can download and burn. and you can sign onto napster at every computer on campus - in the library (w/headphones, of course), in the labs, where ever.

      as far as any mandatory fee...well, i didn't see anything new on my tuition bill, nor was there any unusual increase in price the year they started offering it. it's probably covered under the IT fee (which I assume is what would pay for it), which has been the same since I started here 4 years ago - they're just using the same fee in new ways.

    11. Re:Nice! by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Dont get me wrong. I want to see Eolas crash and burn, but frankly Eolas winning the case is the only way you'll see MS fix their plugin holes. That's why it would be the best thing to happen to IE if they did lose.

      They have to completely trash the way they handle plugins and just about everything ActiveX with something else more secure and bound to either a sandbox or a specific file restricted guest user, and since thats not going to happen anytime soon, an Eolas win would be the next best thing since it forces them to remove plugins altogether.

    12. Re:Nice! by adpowers · · Score: 1

      It is 'free' since they are paying Napster a subscription. You are getting charged for this somewhere, which means you may be getting a few less computers this year or they'll have to wait a little longer to be upgraded.

      In my opinion, this is a horrible misuse of student funds and I would never go for it. I'm glad my college (University of Washington) doesn't do it, they are real smart about those kinds of things.

    13. Re:Nice! by aventius · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the issue was to try to avoid having students at Penn State become the victim of RIAA lawsuits. They succeeded. As far as I know, no Penn State student has been sued. Furthermore, you need to think outside the box of ./. Most people still have trouble burning discs, transfering songs and such. Streaming was sufficient for most people who used the service. And the Napster was definitely close to free. Napster was able to use Penn State as a marketing tool... I'm sure Penn State didn't pay the monthly $9.99 for every student on campus. Anyway... the goal was met and therefore worth the investment to protect the students.

      --
      [insert lame joke here]
  3. That's an education by Flatline_hun · · Score: 0

    worth your money :)

    --
    Yeah, free Ipod! He is innocent!
  4. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems your piss wasn't very frosty after all.

  5. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    AC karma whore post:

    Penn State Tells 80,000 Students To Chuck IE Dec. 10, 2004

    A public university with an enrollment of over 80,000 puts the kibosh on Microsoft's Internet Explorer.

    A public university with an enrollment of over 80,000 put the kibosh this week on Microsoft's Internet Explorer, and urged its students to switch to alternative browsers such as Firefox, Mozilla, Opera, or Safari.

    Penn State University on Wednesday issued an alert to students and staff recommending that they dump IE and use a different browser.

    The university's Information Technology Services (ITS) gave the advice "because the threats are real and alternatives exist to mitigate Web browser vulnerabilities," ITS said in a statement. It cited the security problems in IE that have been the focus of both media reports and recommendations from such organizations as the US-CERT, the federally-funded computer response team housed at Carnegie Mellon University.

    "The University computing community [should] use standards-based Web browsers other than Internet Explorer to help minimize exposure to attacks that occur through browser vulnerabilities," added ITS.

    Penn State's advice is the latest negative news about Microsoft's popular browser. Security problems continue to plague IE -- some patched, some not -- while rivals like Firefox slowly nibble away at its still-dominating market share.

  6. Now the question is... by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will this ITS department support issues with other browsers. Each browser has its quirks, and work arounds for certain things. If they recommend using other browsers, they must be able to support them, especially if they run proxies.

    1. Re:Now the question is... by eneville · · Score: 1

      The browser supports the proxy system, a NAT gateway is pretty much safe, if not, a double edge firewall.. the possibilities are endless.

      What support does a browser need if the pages are W3C compliant... Hell, they could get the webdesign students to redesign the pages as part of a 'Web awareness' project or something!

      Its only a browser, up until FF release 1 no one paid any attention to NS/Moz, now the whole world is shouting "Alternate browser" together.

    2. Re:Now the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, particularly, those issues involve the things that will most infect their computers with spyware!

      Now, tell me again how that hurts them!

    3. Re:Now the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, he might come from a non-tech-company corporate IT background, in which case, rather than squid or mod_proxy, he may be most familiar with "microsoft proxy server", which (of course) only works properly with IE.

      Obviously, any university is going to be using squid or mod_proxy, but it's like someone (let's called A) assuming that people in commercial labs use manual pipettes, because it's all that A knows about, even though the people in the labs are using those funky robot pipetting thingys.

    4. Re:Now the question is... by bone_idol · · Score: 5, Informative
      Firefox supports NTLM authentication on windows also, so you can transparently authenticate. In the location bar type
      about:config
      and look for
      network.automatic-ntlm-auth.allow-proxies
      network .automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-uris
      see http://adam.theficus.com/archives/2004/09/firefox_ tutoria.html
    5. Re:Now the question is... by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 1

      No, I'm a student at another university. We run novell border manager and you have to get the proxies entered just right for it to work. Sometimes hard to get right the first time.

    6. Re:Now the question is... by canavan · · Score: 1

      That's what proxy autoconfig files are good for. Write one, tell people to (and how to) use it and you're done.

    7. Re:Now the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my University (San Francisco State University), firefox is generally encouraged as the default browser for many of the staff and faculty. The student labs usually have both some flavor of mozilla and IE installed. The Division of Information Technology is actively encouraging students to install firefox.

      However, the issue comes with peoplesoft applications used by the university(for which i am an support analyst.) Firefox is not offically supported by Peoplesoft, although it should work fine in both browsers. Applications such as these are making it hard for the university to take a hard stand on IE usage.

    8. Re:Now the question is... by cooley · · Score: 1

      Indiana University Bloomington is distributing Firefox as well. Here's hoping they change some attitudes among our next corporate users.

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    9. Re:Now the question is... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      That's IT's job, not the customers.

      What's so special about students that people forget that they're shelling out big money for a university that works? People don't write code for microsoft, why should they write code for their inept college IT dept?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    10. Re:Now the question is... by NeoChaosX · · Score: 1

      Firefox is not offically supported by Peoplesoft, although it should work fine in both browsers.

      Huh, strange. San Jose State (my university) has the Peoplesoft system as well, but it outright doesn't work in Firefox (you can login, but menus wont display and such). There's not as much push for people to use Firefox in general from the IT people here, which is suprising for a college that prides itself on having the most graduates who work in Silicon Valley.

      --
      One man's selflessness is another man's annoyance.
    11. Re:Now the question is... by flokemon · · Score: 1

      AFAIK the Mozilla browsers support proxies, and also support SOCKS. The lack of SOCKS support was one of the reasons why I ditched Opera for Firefox (well, Phoenix at the time). I haven't really looked at Opera since then - about 3 years ago - so I don't know whether that is still an issue.

      We have stopped using proxies in my workplace, but the Firefox SwitchProxy extension was a great help many times. Save a few proxy configurations, and when you need to switch, it only takes a few seconds. Fantastic.

    12. Re:Now the question is... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm taking a classes at San Jose City College. I pointed out to one of my instructors that I was having problems running the javascript code in Firebird, he told me to use either IE or Netscape since the book doesn't cover Firebird and he never heard of it. About a month later he was recommending students to look at Firebird when the trade journals was giving it a lot of press. Go figure.

    13. Re:Now the question is... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the one thing I don't like about Firefox - so many useful options are hidden in about:config instead of being in the GUI configuration settings management tool.

    14. Re:Now the question is... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      More importantly, will they force all of the departments to only buy online prep and testing services from suppliers that support other browsers? Or will the cries of "But www.medspub.com only supports IE" make it all fall apart after the headlines fade?

    15. Re:Now the question is... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1
      That's IT's job, not the customers.

      1. That's my point exactlly (even though I got modded as "FlameBait" for making it).


      2. The "IT Guys" put the proxie's IP in the DHCP lease and there is nothing else to worry about (as far as that goes, anyway). The client machine knows, or cares, nothing else. No matter what browser the machine is using...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    16. Re:Now the question is... by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The devs behind Firefox are trying really hard to make a piece of Open Source software that appeals to the masses. The non-technical-adepts don't like software with ten jazillion options in a menu tree. The propellor-heads can handle about:config just fine. They've added the features that even 95% of non-IT types think are essential. If you know what NTLM is then about:config is nothing to complain about.

    17. Re:Now the question is... by madprof · · Score: 1

      Instructers are not always 100% clued up on everything...

    18. Re:Now the question is... by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      San Jose State (my university) has the Peoplesoft system as well, but it outright doesn't work in Firefox
      They must be running an old version of PS. We finished a HUGE PS HR system and a HUGE PS Portal system for 140,000 users. I only user Firefox and work and have no problems with the PS Portal. There are a few display problems with only about 3 or 4 pages from broken HTML that the PS Portal churns out, but other then that, no issues at all.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    19. Re:Now the question is... by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 1
      The devs behind Firefox are trying really hard to make a piece of Open Source software that appeals to the masses. The non-technical-adepts don't like software with ten jazillion options in a menu tree

      I appreciate their goal, however, why would it be wrong to include an "advanced" tab/button/check box, that would allow the rest of these options to be seen by everyone who cares.

      I am not even sure that it matters that much, my wife doesn't ever change ANY preferences/options, however the software is set up that's how she will use it. It is up to me to make sure her software is running with the right settings.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    20. Re:Now the question is... by mpe · · Score: 1

      That's the one thing I don't like about Firefox - so many useful options are hidden in about:config instead of being in the GUI configuration settings management tool.

      This is not always a bad thing. It helps prevent the GUI becoming cluttered. Also provides for demarkation between user alterable and admin alterable settings.

    21. Re:Now the question is... by canavan · · Score: 1

      [...] proxie's IP in the DHCP lease

      That may work with transparent proxies if you let DHCP configure that host as a router, but is not what I was talking about. I ment one of those - those that you can point Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Proxies/Automatic Proxy Configuration URL (or whatever it is in your browser) to. Very nice to have your Notebook's proxy settings adjusted properly between home and work if you can store them under the same URL. There is not much to support as long as you tell your users which URL to paste into which dialog.

    22. Re:Now the question is... by Zonnald · · Score: 1

      Call me confused, but if I download "Firebird" am I not getting a 1 y.o. version of a browser named now called "Firefox"?

      Cause if I was not well versed in Browsers, and I caught this snipped and downloaded and started using this, could I be in for a whole load of trouble? I mean is this version old enought not to have certain vulnerabilities closed?

      Firebird

    23. Re:Now the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what an "Advanced Options" button in the options dialog is for. If you're afraid that ordinary users will click the button and be initmidated by the "ten jazillion options", then put a "Use Advanced Options Dialog" option in about:config instead of using an "Advanced Options" button.

    24. Re:Now the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The lack of SOCKS support was one of the reasons why I ditched Opera for Firefox (well, Phoenix at the time)."

      There are these things called bracers that can help you keep your socks up, but most socks these days have enough elastic in them to keep themselves up. Perhaps you are buying one size too big? And what do socks have to do with browsers, anyway?

    25. Re:Now the question is... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I meant Firefox. I started using it when it was Firebird. If I recall correctly, Firefox is the third name change for the browser.

  7. Another win for Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hope they listen.

  8. People still use IE? by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I ditched it as soon as I discovered Camino (fka Chimera).

    1. Re:People still use IE? by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I ditched it as soon as I discovered Camino (fka Chimera).

      Of course people don't still use IE on Mac OS X, because everyone knows it sucks ass. That has nothing to do with millions of Windows users who DON'T know any better.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:People still use IE? by OmniVector · · Score: 2, Informative

      sadly that's not true. pretty much every old school mac os 9 user i know that now uses os x uses IE for mac. STILL. even though microsoft publically said they are stopping all updates (including security)

      --
      - tristan
    3. Re:People still use IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded as Flamebait? He's stating out the fact that Mac (or any "alternative platform" for that matter) users are, by definition, aware of better alternatives to the manure Microsoft is manufacturing, and that the greatest hurdle in spreading alternative solutions is making typical Windows users realize that they do have a choice.

      The presence of expression "sucks ass" does not make parent a flamebait.

    4. Re:People still use IE? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      To be honest, most OS X users just see the compass icon for Safari in the dock and think, "Oh, there's the internet," just like they do with IE on Windows.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    5. Re:People still use IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone seriously ought to try to find new security flaws in IE 5.5 so that Apple will release a software update to delete it or something.

      IE 5.5 sucks.

    6. Re:People still use IE? by stellertony · · Score: 1

      I tell everyone to use Firefox (or Safari if they have OS X)

      --
      feeding the world its brain food
    7. Re:People still use IE? by westlake · · Score: 1
      the greatest hurdle in spreading alternative solutions is making typical Windows users realize that they do have a choice.

      the greatest hurdle is persuading users to make the choice. alternative browsers have been trumpted from the rooftops for years and none has made a lasting impression on IE's market share.

    8. Re:People still use IE? by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Part of that is because IE for the Mac is still a good browser. It really isn't as bad as IE for Windows.

      One thing that IE on the Mac can do that IE for Windows can't -- aside form not opening up your computer to a hundred vulnerabilities -- is handle PNGs properly. I don't know why. IE on Windows can't handle PNG alpha channels, while IE on the Mac handles them just fine.

      I don't use IE on my Mac anymore, but I still have to occasionally check web pages. It's not a bad browser, but Firefox and Safari do have richer feature sets.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    9. Re:People still use IE? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      The question is WHO the hell is installing the alternatives for the student if IE should be taken off. IT needs to be somewhat responsible.

      Bring your PC to the computer center, we'll run firefoxsetup.exe for you. Ok. now go home. Repeat for 80 billion students.

    10. Re:People still use IE? by jeef_zula · · Score: 1

      All PennState computing labs have Mozilla, Opera, and Firefox installed and updated. The choice is there, and I always take advantage of it.

    11. Re:People still use IE? by great+throwdini · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Part of that is because IE for the Mac is still a good browser. It really isn't as bad as IE for Windows.

      No, no it's not.

      It's neither as "good" as MSIE (6.x) for Windows, nor a solid browser for Mac (OS X).

      OS 9 is another matter, but the stability and utility of MSIE running atop OS X is dreadful. It's less stable, somehow, than the OS 9 version ... and as you point out, its feature set doesn't compare well to at least two common alternatives for OS X: Safari and Firefox.

      It's good enough for OS 9, as there aren't (m)any viable or even supported alternatives on that platform, but being the probable best browser for a dead OS isn't much to crow about. A shame that OS 9 users are more or less shackled to it.

      For OS X, MSIE is painfully bug-ridden, prone to crashing, and terribly behind-the-times in terms of "Web technologies" and "standards support" (whatever those are). Quite sad, really, given how far ahead it of the pack just a few short years ago.

  9. In Other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Penn state students tell college to ditch Joe Paterno

    1. Re:In Other news... by zomper514 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait you can't like computers and football at the same time.

    2. Re:In Other news... by gnuLNX · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --
      what?
    3. Re:In Other news... by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn right! You have to like a real mans man sport like beating the crap out of people!

      Why, oh why, aren't there more nerds with an appreciation for both intellectual pursuits, and the fine art of kicking the crap out of someone? WHYYYYY?!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    4. Re:In Other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL ... ... ... .... and me without mod points...
      DOH! I only post AC...
      But still funny and a good observation.

  10. The Linux Gay Conspiracy by Shoeboy · · Score: 0
    In my case, it was Microsoft that told me to ditch IE. At least I think that was the message they were trying to send when windows update introduced a buggy version that kept me from using IE to read my webmail or check my credit card ballance online. I'm much happier now that I'm using Safari on OS X.

    Yours in Christ,
    shoeboy

    1. Re:The Linux Gay Conspiracy by eneville · · Score: 1

      Thats not the first time they've said that:

      http://slate.msn.com/id/2103152/

      I suppose now at least you can access www.gnaa.us with Safari.

  11. This is news!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Educated people have known for some time that IE is shit. Seems the masses are just now starting to slowly realize that.

  12. IST vs ITS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That should be ITS in the write-up. IST is the PSU school of Information Sciences and Technology (www.ist.psu.edu).

  13. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A destination for my ancient AOL cd's... that enhanced ie browser stuck on there is alot better than plain ie.

  14. Good move! by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I wish more colleges had IT departments that made decisions like this. At the major state university that I go to, the university website and everything in it are designed to be browsed via IE. It's quite annoying when I have to close Firefox and use a slow, buggy, adware- and virus-vulnerable browser just to, say, look at courses when I'm scheduling for the next semester.

    Kudos to Penn State for not falling into the "it's built into the OS so we'll use it as a standard!" trap.

    --
    Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
    1. Re:Good move! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Don't know if this is still true, but PSU's IT department was fairly good when I went there (compared to stories on /. about other schools). At the old computer store (I believe now rolled into the main bookstore) they had equal numbers of PC and Mac models, which by itself shows that they at least allow for differing computer types. A guy I knew, as a senior project, had to make an OS based on this "Linux" thingy, which in '97 I never even heard of.

      Good school. Bad football team. Go JoePa.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    2. Re:Good move! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      My university supports only old versions of Mozilla on Windows and Mac and nothing on Unix or Linux. Kind of odd when everything in the CS department is Linux based and can't access the university webmail system. Maybe that's why the CS department has its own webmail system without the bullshit.

    3. Re:Good move! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **posting anon because this is about work

      >"it's built into the OS so we'll use it as a standard!"

      Its not really the OS, its the server side of things. And its too late for many schools. I work PT at the IS department of the school I attend and there's no way anything but IE will work with our distance learning system. Its all streaming windows media and activeX. A lot of the services we provide are outsourced, like our e-recruiting site or some features of our "blackboard" system. Neither of these web services are servers we own, they're leased and they just use our .edu address.

      Like a lot of schools we've already invested in an IE only infrastructure and our vendors aren't big on non-IE browsers. To top it off, like any other college we've been courted by MS to the point where we're kicking out Novell because of some serious discounts. And I mean serious. I talked to one of the higher ups last year and the price wasnt just discounted, it was a handout. Go all AD/windows services and get rid of Novell and a 15,000 person school can have all the MS they want for a few thousand dollars. Teach ASP.NET, C#, and ignore UNIX and here we are. Hell, all the best paying jobs out there demand some type of unix background nowadays.

      Schools that can get away with using non-IE can pull off what Penn did, but right now there's so much invested in IE/MS only stuff that, well, don't hold your breath.

      On the positive side, there's no stopping someone from running moz or firefox 99% of the time and firing up IE when they need it. Yet, many students just run their computer to the ground and consider a full re-install every month or so to be normal. Hell, I half-suspect they prefer to do that than switch browsers. The force of habit and MS's branding is pretty powerful stuff.

      At the end of the day, its not MS who is the bogeyman, its the short sighted IS people who never cared for standards and getting things done right. Now that we shut down ports by the dozen per day and have students re-image their computers constantly they might change their ways and take security and standards a bit more seriously. But it would take us a few years to be non-IE compliant. I doubt we're much different than most colleges.

    4. Re:Good move! by rzebram · · Score: 1

      It would be great if not only colleges but public school districts made more decisions like this, or at least encouraged the use of another browser. In our district, schools don't run Firefox simply because "the district doesn't support it." This means that web design classes, which should be switching more from the "do your HTML for flaws in IE" frame-of-mind to the "make it standards compliant and work with everything" mindset. Kind of makes you wonder what will happen once these students get out into the real world and their designs don't work under Firefox for their boss... Thank you, education.

    5. Re:Good move! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kudos to Penn State for not falling into the "it's built into the OS so we'll use it as a standard!" trap.

      Now if only people could overcome the "It's the OS that shipped with the computer, so we'll use it as a standard!" trap.

    6. Re:Good move! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh yeah, much better to slip into the "let's change everything just because we can trap". Never mind no compatible software. So long as we can Google our solutions for hours and hours and sort through 3,560,000 hits for our problem (ie, "linux dvd player"), we're all set.

      I for one can't wait until some major school adopts Linux as its only supported OS (because some near-sighted IT flunkie happens to like it for no good reason) and gets wasted as the barage of support calls start pouring in. The Linux zealots are still over-selling their software without due consideration to what the average person knows and needs.

    7. Re:Good move! by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      I go to the college of new jersey and they recently switched to thunderbird. It would have made more sense to me to also switch to firefox since their internal sites work fine with it. They use windows 2000 on all of their machines so they're pretty stable. The students' machines are really the ones bogged down with spyware

  15. Temple not quite that far by ntxb229 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I go to Temple University and while our CS department hasn't gone that far they have installed Firefox on all the computers in the labs

    1. Re:Temple not quite that far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at my school we all browse with Kazaa.

    2. Re:Temple not quite that far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my school, we are all but forced to use IE. I can't do my calculus work without it.

  16. Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Insightful
    1) They'll pretend it didn't happen

    2) They'll sue

    3) They'll go on a charm offensive

    4) They'll spin the virtues of Longhorn

    5) They'll talk about IE's innovative approach to browsing

    Others...?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by eneville · · Score: 2, Funny

      > 1) They'll pretend it didn't happen

      2) ...

      3) Profit

    2. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by gnuLNX · · Score: 1

      3)

      --
      what?
    3. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny
      Others...?

      6) They'll cut the price.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    4. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll wave some funding cash for a new building, a new computer lab, sponsor some software grant, and present their new version of ISA featuring the latest in firewall technology: Baldy Wan Kenobi waving his hand and saying "there are no security vulnerabilities in this Windows-only monoculture."

      Faith-based computing at its finest.

    5. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      6) Improve Internet Explorer so that it is better and more secure than Firefox.

      Well, its possible... right?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    6. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by IInventedTheInternet · · Score: 1

      6) Renew contract with Satan

    7. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      6) They'll donate to the school - either kiosk computers with just IE, some web system that only works with IE, or enough general funds for new computers or a Steven Ballmer Building so that they'll retract their statement or never do something like that again.

      At this point, Microsoft needs to pay for market share and mindshare. IE can't compete at its current price (free/bundled), so they'll lower it.

    8. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


      6) If you don't use Internet Explorer, we will kill you.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    9. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

      6) Profit ???

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    10. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They buy Penn state?

    11. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      That's easy.

      They'll use a combination of the carrot *and* the stick, to force Penn State to behave itself. This may include any or all of the following: cutting the IT dept a sweetheart deal on OS/devsoftware/office licensing, donating money for new buildings, donating new machines to computer labs, threatening a license audit, threatening to sue over software piracy, threatening to sue over patents owned by Penn State, withdrawing pledged donations, Pennsylvania lobbyists dicking with Penn State's budget and possibly even lowkey extortion of trustees and deans.

      They'll keep applying more of said tactics, until Penn State publically withdraws this policy.

      Duh.

    12. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      6) They'll donate to the school - either kiosk computers with just IE, some web system that only works with IE, or enough general funds for new computers or a Steven Ballmer Building so that they'll retract their statement or never do something like that again.

      Their browser still sucks and is insecure, and I doubt it will be recommended by the college (and everyone else in the know) with the "donation".

    13. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 1

      >> At this point, Microsoft needs to pay for market share and mindshare. IE can't compete at its current price (free/bundled), so they'll lower it.

      That is simultaneously one of the funniest and scariest things I've ever read about IE. Very insightful. Microsoft made their bed (that is, giving away the browser for free), and now they have to sleep in it.

    14. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by fermion · · Score: 1

      they will remove current funding from the CS department, or base future licenses on the reccomended use of IE.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    15. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by obdulio · · Score: 1

      it's called "Wishfull Thinking'

      --
      PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
    16. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Since Msft successfully proved in federal court that 'the browser is the OS' or tried to prove something to that effect - anyway, the next step is to ban the OS and get a real educational system.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    17. Re:Any guesses what Microsoft's response will be? by lxs · · Score: 1

      Surprise BSA audit?

  17. Good job, Please make windows next! by argoff · · Score: 0


    subject says it all

  18. 80,000 by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe the 80,000 refers to the students, not the staff.

    --
    Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    1. Re:80,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That depends on whether you want to talk about University Park campus or the entire PSU school system. UP enrollment for fall 2004 was about 41,000. System wide enrollment was about 81,000.

      http://live.psu.edu/still_life/2004_10_28_04_enr ol lment/enrollment_fall04.pdf

    2. Re:80,000 by davandhol · · Score: 1

      I find that hard to believe--PSU isn't that big. The univeresity with the largest enrollment rate is OHIO State university, with ~50,000.

    3. Re:80,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does OSU have 18 branch campuses?
      i work for PSU
      trust me, theres that many students.

    4. Re:80,000 by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      Funny thing about State College. When school starts, the population of the city doubles from 40K to 80K. When it's home football game weekend, it doubles again to 160K.

      And people wonder why I left...

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    5. Re:80,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: that's THE Ohio State University

    6. Re:80,000 by _Qiang_ · · Score: 0

      Note it's only a recommendation. They are not enforcing students and staff to change.

      students usually are savvy computer users and easy deal with anyway. It's the staff that gives the most problem.

      In my university, we are preparing migrate email system from UW imap to Courier imap. this involves setting changes (root folder path) on client email software (pine/outlook).we got a lot resistance because of this.

      a lot politics when you have to deal with the staff.

  19. I go to Penn State by TechnologyX · · Score: 1

    Maybe now I won't have to install Firefox from my personal account every time I use the university computer lab.

    --
    Slashdot sucks
    1. Re:I go to Penn State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's on all the Mac boxes already

    2. Re:I go to Penn State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installing open source software, and freeware gets mentioned at the PSU ITS Student Advisory Committee meetings every semester. Unfortunately, the windows lab people seem to view that as a low priority compared to making sure the latest versions of things like MS Visual Studio are installed :(

    3. Re:I go to Penn State by E8086 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have the same problem at Rutgers and here's my way around it.
      Instead of reinstalling every time get the zipped distro of firefox and put it on a usb drive. It can be personalized a little:
      replace Firefox\defaults\profile\bookmarks.html with your saved bookmarks
      and copy the contents of Firefox\plugins to Firefox 1.0\plugins on the usb drive.
      I havn't tried it with any themes or extensions yet.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    4. Re:I go to Penn State by praxim · · Score: 1

      Firefox has been on the lab computers for a rather long time.

    5. Re:I go to Penn State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just use the version of firefox/thunderbird that is meant for usb drives?

    6. Re:I go to Penn State by TechnologyX · · Score: 0

      I'm at the Erie campus ( Behrend ), it's still not on there, I have to install it each time :(

      --
      Slashdot sucks
  20. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't we lucky Mozilla vunerabilities aren't "as real":
    http://secunia.com/advisories/13129/?show_all_rela ted=1#related

    1. Re:Duh! by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      They're there. But far less than IE's. There's 30 for Firefox/Mozilla, and 125 for IE. Plus there's 1996 virus listings that affect IE, 0 for Mozilla/Firefox. Mozilla/Firefox is listed as moderately critical, IE is listed as highly critical.

      http://secunia.com/search/?search=Internet+Explore r

  21. Quit Using IE by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0
    Quit using IE.

    Can quit using Windows be far behind?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Quit Using IE by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Can quit using Windows be far behind?

      already answered:
      from the and-while-you're-at-it-mull-over-your-OS dept.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Quit Using IE by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Little anectdotal evidence from someone who goes to Penn State:No.
      When I am on campus and need to print something(something that seems to come up fairly often since most hw assignments for certain classes are avaialable only online), I always laugh at the fact that students are willing to stand in line and wait for a windows computer rather than use the Macs which are always available. Doesn't bother me though, I just go right to the front of the line and go in, do what I need to do, and get out. I highly doubt most of the students are doing anything on those windows machines that cannot be done on a Mac, but for whatever reason they refuse to use them.....I will leave guesses as to the reason as an exercise for the reader.

    3. Re:Quit Using IE by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      Hey, correct the English in your sig.

    4. Re:Quit Using IE by linguae · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because of the lack of floppy drives on the non-beige Macs, and students lack of a USB pen (or FTP server). Despise Jobs's (and now Gates's) efforts, floppies are still alive in many places. At my school, the same scenario as yours occurs. In the library's open lab, there are about 50 PCs with Windows 2000 and 5 Macs with Mac OS 9. The Windows PCs are usually always taken and a line always form, whereas nobody touches the Macs there, so whenever I'm in the library and need a computer, I jump to the front of the line and use the Macs there. There is also another open Mac lab in the graphics building, full of G4s with OS X Jaguar installed, but that building, for the most part, never gets filled. Yet, there is another open lab in another building with Windows 2000 machines, which also always gets full, too.

    5. Re:Quit Using IE by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Yes. Far, far behind. There is no reason for a major university to switch off Windows-XPSP2 serves its purpose just fine.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    6. Re:Quit Using IE by aventius · · Score: 1

      Every student at Penn State has an FTP server (whether or not they know it). Their storage folder can be accessed via FTP anywhere, or as "My Documents" on Windows Lab Computers, and as "Home" on Mac, Sun, and Linux boxes. No one uses the Macs at Penn State because of the anti-Mac FUD that the entire IBM-compatible industry continually propigate. On a side note... IBM-compatible really should mean Apples in todays world. With IBM's pc business sold, they are pretty much focused only on the POWER & PowerPC architecture which is... well only Apple, IBM, and Pegasus.

      --
      [insert lame joke here]
    7. Re:Quit Using IE by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Don't Macs support USB floppy drives?

    8. Re:Quit Using IE by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      It's hard to stay mad at someone who gives you cookies.

      Unless they're advertising cookies on my hard drive. :^)

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    9. Re:Quit Using IE by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      You can hardly blame people for wanting to use what they know. Sit somebody who's only ever used Windows in front of a Mac and ask them to do just about anything and they just won't be able to do it. Even if they can, the effort will be too much.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Macs are difficult to use, I'm just saying people will naturally want to wait to use a PC rather than expeience the pain to trying to work out how to use a new system - be that Mac, KDE, BeOS or anything. The idea that an operating system of any kind can be "intuitive" really *is* stupid though.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    10. Re:Quit Using IE by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      Only if they're the kind of person who rides the short bus to stupid-town. Sit in front of a Mac and there's a mouse and a big blue "e" for internet explorer (at the Mac lab at my school we have firefox and safari but I never, ever see anybody else use one). You click on the "e," just like you would with Windows, and up comes internet explorer, just like with windows. There's also an MS Word icon. Between the 2 of those you have 90% of what people in the computer labs do.

      I don't think people know this because they've probably never even tried the Macs. They'd rather stand in line for 10 minutes than have to learn something new.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    11. Re:Quit Using IE by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      It's because the Macs are missing a mouse button.

      What's an "Apple + Click"?

    12. Re:Quit Using IE by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      All the mice in the school are 2 button mice. Yes, the default mouse from Apple has 1 button(you have to hit ctrl-click to get the 2nd), but OS X has had support for 2 button scroll mice for quite a while, just plug it in and the OS recognizes it.

  22. Go, Lions!!! by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 3, Funny
    I say Joe Pa, you say 'terno!
    Joe Pa...
    ...'terno!
    Joe Pa...
    ...'terno!

    I say M.O., you say 'zilla!
    M.O....
    ...'zilla!
    M.O....
    ...'zilla!

    (pause)

    MOZILLA!!!

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    1. Re:Go, Lions!!! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I say "We are", you say "Penn State"
      We are...
      ...Penn State
      We are....
      ....Penn State


      Now I say "We are", you say, "using an open-source, secure and standards complaint browser!"
      Hmm...just doesn't have the same ring to it...

    2. Re:Go, Lions!!! by trifster · · Score: 1

      I love it..this is great. Class of '01. We are....Penn State.

    3. Re:Go, Lions!!! by subsolar2 · · Score: 1

      How about this
      Oh no, they say Bill's got to go...
      Go go Mozilla!

      Oh no, there goes Microsoft...
      Go go Mozilla!

    4. Re:Go, Lions!!! by JunkDNA · · Score: 1

      To borrow a phrase from the old Mellon Bank Pins they handed out before Ohio State games:

      "IE don't think so!"

      Class of '00
      We are...
      ...Penn State

    5. Re:Go, Lions!!! by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      Wow, Mellon Bank. They are no more.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  23. Re:Alternate browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you on about? The headline tells you very clearly that the students are being told to use an alternative to Internet Explorer. How much more information do you need here?

  24. Brown's been saying this and acting on it by c0dedude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At Brown we get a CD with all the latest security patches and a copy of Firefox every year. Prevents trouble, methinks.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Brown's been saying this and acting on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, this is the only possible connection anyone could find between the Ivy Brown and Penn State "University".

    2. Re:Brown's been saying this and acting on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many years have they been doing this?

    3. Re:Brown's been saying this and acting on it by Adam9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Our IT Services Support Desk uses Firefox as one of the last steps in our browser troubleshooting.

      The interesting thing is that I have had several people call us this semester asking how to uninstall Internet Explorer. I usually give them a quick rant. Today, I told someone asking me the same question to go watch Antitrust.

    4. Re:Brown's been saying this and acting on it by thejoelpatrol · · Score: 1

      Same with Stanford. We get free virus protection software and SpySweeper, too. Every dorm has a Resident Computer Coordinator that encourages us to install all of this stuff. Not everyone does (some of them can barely copy and paste), but I know my roommate has been glad to have been told about this. He's not great with computers, but using a different browser, using Spy Sweeper, etc. is not hard and he's happy to do it now that someone told him the risks and provided the software. Incidentally, we Mac folk get free virus protection and whatnot also, but our RCC doesn't even bother explaining it to us (in his words "If you have a Mac, she'll always be happy").

    5. Re:Brown's been saying this and acting on it by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Penn State is an excellent school. I'm sorry you are bitter about your rejection.

    6. Re:Brown's been saying this and acting on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats the color of shit .... brown brown

      I loved game night against brown so many great chants

  25. Now if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more colleges would think seriously about the security of their students' computers, the world would be a better place.

    At my school (a fairly "tech"ful place) the Network Operations website doesn't even acknowledge the possibility of students using Macs, let alone free OS's. (I'm the only person in my dorm who isn't running Windows XP.) They make sure everyone installs the latest security patches, they've got site licenses for various anti-virus programs, but they'd never consider telling people to use something other than Microsoft software...

  26. security through obscurity by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I consider this article to be firm proof that alternate browsers are a form of security through obscurity. Not that that is a bad thing if it works, and in this case it is clear that IE is being targeted more than its alternatives.

    But make sure that your alternate browser it is a recent version of Firefox or Mozilla. They have responded very quickly to security issues, and are being proactive about security, much more so than the the people behind Konqueror or Opera. Also, keep your alternate browser patched just as vigilantly as you would Internet Explorer. As the popularity increases you will see more attacks against Mozilla based browsers.

    I don't know what the answer to security is. I hope it isn't educating users, because that just plain doesn't work for most people. The problem is that right now there doesn't seem to be any other way.

    --

    Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
    whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
    --Proverbs 9:7
    1. Re:security through obscurity by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point isnt to replace an all-MS/IE enviroment with an all-Mozilla environment - the point is for there to be a healthy ecosystem of browsers, so that there will no longer be one homogenous set of systems all vulnerable to the same attacks.

    2. Re:security through obscurity by TheLetterPsy · · Score: 1

      Everything that ^he^ said, plus example: APACHE vs. IIS!! Now tell me about your precious security through obscurity!! I know I know, Score:-1,Redundant.

    3. Re:security through obscurity by Rits · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But make sure that your alternate browser it is a recent version of Firefox or Mozilla. They have responded very quickly to security issues, and are being proactive about security, much more so than the the people behind Konqueror or Opera.

      I'm sorry, but that is FUD. Opera will be the first browser to patch the latest, cross-browser, issue.

      A fixed 7.54u1 is being distributed at this moment. See the Opera advisory.

      And as far as solutions go: why expect perfect safety online, when we don't have it offline either? Software should improve, online systems should be more secure (it is stupid if money can change hands online only secured by a single login), and most people will smarten up in time. Perfection will not be reached.

      MSIE has a track record of leaving critical holes open for a while, but most reported holes are not critical. And MSIE is much more informative about it issues than either Opera, which only recently started publishing advisories, and Firefox (what advisories?) Selling Firefox purely on the safety issue will come back to bite it in the long run.
      --
      If you don't like having choices made for you, you should start making your own. - Neal Stephenson
    4. Re:security through obscurity by kundor · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can say that the Konqueror devs are reticent about security. It's true that due to its small market share, there simply aren't many security issues discovered to respond to, but I'm sure if one was discovered they would take it seriously. They've already gone to great lengths to warn users about possible user agent spoofing, against which some other browsers offer no protection.

    5. Re:security through obscurity by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Actually with konqueror if you change the popup blocking policy to smart which I think is the default it is not affected. Only if the popup policy is set to allow does the problem exist.

      I think firefox and mozilla have a similar workaround also. It should also be pointed out that this workaround is the most advised configuration to run konqueror in since the smart policy means that popups can only open as a response to use clicks and never just on their own. This makes it more useful then just a regular popup blocker or a general allow policy.

      I did try their exploit on my machines and it seems that all of the konqueror browers where configured correctly to begin with and the exploit did not work.

      Opera is an interesting browser and I have no real issues with it but the other browsers where not as affected as they where made out to be. I would like to see a mix of khtml, gecko and opera based browsers out there so that none of them has a truly dominant share of the market and since all of them are standards compliant it is easy to make code work in all of them.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    6. Re:security through obscurity by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The passing monoculture of browserdom will make it more difficult for browser based attacks to occur.

      Not only that, but it makes it possible for more browsers to exist, as web programming will target known standards more and more, and hopefully life will be good.

      At least that's the utopian view. I foresee another huge battle coming between XAML and XUL, along with a whole new vector of viral attacks.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    7. Re:security through obscurity by csk_1975 · · Score: 1

      proof that alternate browsers are a form of security through obscurity...As the popularity increases you will see more attacks against Mozilla based browsers.

      I've seen this argument a few times. "Microsoft has a large number of identified security issues because it has the largest market share so more people are looking for security holes". But this assumes that all software has the same number of flaws just waiting to be found - which is demonstrably false.

    8. Re:security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of mozilla, that really is the reason. Look at the code, it is a giant mess of shit, even the devs refuse to fix bugs in certain parts of the code because it is "too hairy" and "nobody really knows whats going on in there". That, combined with the fact that the mozilla coders have never made any attempt to program securely, or be in any way proactive assures us that mozilla has just as many exploits waiting in there as IE does.

    9. Re:security through obscurity by fermion · · Score: 1
      Repeat carefully after me. Security through obscurity is not a bad thing. It can and is part of a well thought out security plan. This is why it is often useful to spoof you MAC address, or browser name, or OS. Keeping some information from the criminals is useful.

      The problems manifest when obscurity becomes your primary defense. As long as we write portble HTML and keep out demands reasonable, then on the internet we can switch browsers at will. The problem is that many schools have fallen to idea of "cheap" code and made all web access dependent on IE, which was and is stupid. If they now make code Gecko dependent, that would be equally stupid.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    10. Re:security through obscurity by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Popular things are attacked more, and the quanity of attacks is the casue of exploits. Hmm.. Want to explain IIS/Apache to me then?

    11. Re:security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moron, servers are not attacked as often as individual user PC's are. Apache's prevelance has more to do with initial costs than security (short-sighted IT geeks with no supervision or long-term vision).

    12. Re:security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is demonstrably false

      unless you are a person who knows anything... then you know it is correct

    13. Re:security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you don't know the meaning of the word, "demonstrably". Reliably proving software correctness has eluded CS for decades. They should have taken hints from electrical engineers years ago and developed simulators capable of testing all states. Sadly, since anyone with a computer can become a "computer genius" (or at least think he/she is), there's no incentive to make software development/testing more rigorous.

    14. Re:security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Opera will be the first browser to patch the latest, cross-browser, issue.

      Opera may be the first to patch it, but I've tried it with versions of OmniWeb as far back as August 2003, and none of them are vulnerable. How's that for proactive?

    15. Re:security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't 5% of 100% still leave 95% unaccounted? if that's your idea of obscure, what's your idea of secure?

    16. Re:security through obscurity by stere0 · · Score: 1

      Apple's Safari has already patched this. It actually patched it weeks ago, shortly after the advisory came out.

      --
      Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  27. heh :) by Phil246 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    the university where im at, the lecturer on our web authoring course encourages us to " get a life " if we like windows, or internet explorer.
    Problem is, hes a mac fan and encourages us to get one of those instead.
    cant have it all i suppose

    1. Re:heh :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, professors with their own agenda to push in an environment that is supposed to be objective and fact-based.

    2. Re:heh :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose that if the university offers a "web site authoring" course, it is probably not a real university, but simply something that passes for one in this day and age. I agree with your main point though.

    3. Re:heh :) by Phil246 · · Score: 1

      its not a course per-se., its a module of the first year of an applied computing course. My bad for not making that clearer

  28. safari? by jxyama · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if a student can run safari as an alternative, then he/she must be using a Mac. not to defend IE, but isn't IE for Mac less dangerous than IE for Windows? if he/she has already ditched Windows, does he/she need to ditch IE too?

    1. Re:safari? by Blamemyparents · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IE for mac is vulnerable to many of the 'make it crash!' exploits. exploits designed to mess with Windows through IE of course fail. Many mac users use IE because it was the default browser in OS X before Safari came out (Irony, huh?). Safari came with 10.3, but I don't think the system changes the default browser on install.

    2. Re:safari? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Or, it could be an invitation to ditch windows and get yourself a Mac -- thus (for now) eliminating your virulence.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:safari? by kaleco · · Score: 1

      I believe IE for the Mac is still on version 5.5. It has not been updated by MS for quite some time to compensate for vulnerabilities.
      I am a Mac user myself and find it hard to imagine chosing the clunky IE over Safari. Safari, despite being a little less-featured than Firefox (none of the new RSS tricks) is a very nippy little app that serves my needs. Unlike IE, it doesn't give me CSS rendering issues either.

      --
      Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge
    4. Re:safari? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      IE for Mac is no longer being developed at all. All current known bugs and exploits, as well as any yet to be found, will never be fixed. No new features will ever be added.

      If you still use IE for Mac, switch for god's sake! Safari, Firefox, whatever. Just about any browser you can think of is a better choice, now more than ever.

    5. Re:safari? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Nobody in their right mind uses IE for Mac because it's a horrible, horrible program. Safari comes as the default browser for all new Macs (I don't know why Apple even bothers to bundle IE any more, it must be a contract thing) and there is a Firefox build for them too.

    6. Re:safari? by mroch · · Score: 1

      The IE/Mac team at Microsoft was disbanded. There will be no new versions of IE/Mac. Security and standards support is decent in IE/Mac, but it'll never support CSS3 or XHTML 2.0... it would be dumb on any geek's part to recommend switching to IE/Mac now.

    7. Re:safari? by the+pickle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In a word, yes.

      IE on the Mac is a horrid, horrid abomination of a browser. The only worse browser features-wise is Opera.

      IE for the Mac has several outstanding security issues (sorry, but I don't have current links) that will never be resolved because Microsoft has terminated development of IE. Good riddance, I say. It wasn't EVER a competitive browser on OS X, and it's hardly competitive on OS 9.

      To answer your other question, well, yeah, Mac IE is less dangerous that Win IE because of its lower level of OS integration, but they're both still pretty crappy browsers compared to what else is out there.

      p

    8. Re:safari? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      Also, in the next major OS upgrade, the new version of Safari will have RSS. Could be a maximum of 6 months for that though.

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    9. Re:safari? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe IE for the Mac is still on version 5.5

      Actually 5.2.3.

      IE Mac is a different development from IE PC. Different code throughout, and different version sequence. And as mentioned below, the team was disbanded. (Apparently because they embarassed the IE PC group by knowing how to code to W3C specs, but that shall remain rumour.) It's a dead and unsupported browser, rapidly becoming a historical footnote due to Safari.

    10. Re:safari? by GarfBond · · Score: 1

      As a Mac user, you probably should anyway, especially since IE/Mac is dead in the water and will never ever be updated again, period.

      That's about as a good a reason to switch to something else as any. Nevermind the fact that every other browser on Mac OSX is far better anyway. It's not like IE/Mac always displays pages written for IE/Win perfectly anyway; the engines were completely different to begin with.

    11. Re:safari? by addaon · · Score: 1

      Irony, huh?

      I do not think that word means what you think it means.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    12. Re:safari? by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not to defend IE, but isn't IE for Mac less dangerous than IE for Windows?

      A live hand grenade with the pin pulled is less dangerous than IE for Windows.

      True, IE for Mac doesn't have any of the vulnerabilities of its Windows cousin. For one thing, when malware tries to install to "c:\windows", Mac OS says, "Huh? What?" That, plus the fact that the Mac development team wrote the browser from scratch, so the two have little or no code in common.

      IE for Mac is getting quite old, but it still has its uses. It's the only Mac browser that runs VBScript, and a client site that we inherited from another company makes heavy use of VBScript on the client side, so I end up having to use IE once or twice a week.

      It used to be the best browser on any platform, back in the day. Now it looks as bare-bones next to Firefox as Notepad looks next to MS Word.

    13. Re:safari? by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 1

      Bah! IE 5.2 doesn't even support XHTML 1.0 or CSS2 as it is! It's got nothing more than a tag soup parser. Heck, it hardly even supports the full CSS1 standard!

    14. Re:safari? by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      IE 5.2 does support part of CSS2.

    15. Re:safari? by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 1

      My bad. I was thinking of the partial support, and forgot that they do actually support part of CSS2, even though they still don't have full support for CSS1.

    16. Re:safari? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While IE for mac has generally been a very separate and much better platform than IE for windows it is probably still not safe to embrace any browser which fully supports microsoft's extensions to the web. Of course macs don't do activex, which is probably why microsoft is giving up on IE for mac. With Safari around, there is no real reason for mac users to bother with IE, unless they're running it under windows on an emulated PC, in order to get access to activex-only sites or something.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:safari? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Apple bundles IE with Macs because a few sites refuse to work with any other browser, yeah I suppose I should have boycotted them, but I needed cheap health insurance so I just had to suck it up and use IE for about 5 minutes. Not entirely useful, but nice to have in case of emergencies and it doesn't really take up much disk space nor does it appear on the dock by default, so no harm in having it there.

    18. Re:safari? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are clearly retarded. Opera has more features than any other browser on the market.

    19. Re:safari? by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You clearly haven't used the Mac version of Opera.

      Go download it, and tell me I'm wrong.

      p

  29. Security by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks like IE get burned by the very same 'feature' that allowed it to get 95% market share : integration with Windows and total access to stuff it shouldn't. Lesson learned, Microsoft?

    But even without security, FireFox is just plain better. Tabbed browsing is huge, Bookmark toolbar, extensions, find-as-you-type (HUGE improvement over CTRL+F search)... Now I look at IE (the rare time I need to open it for windowsupdate) and it just feels...dirty.

    1. Re:Security by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Lesson learned, Microsoft?

      Dude, which do you think Microsoft is more concerned with: Security, or having people locked into their products? Not that Microsoft isn't patching their products NOW, but it comes as a distant second to having you use their product in the first place. Integrating it with the OS such that the two are inseperable was part of the DESIGN.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Security by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I can't surf without tabbed browsing anymore. However, I'm typing this on Firefox 1.0, and there appears to be no find-as-you-type available; I've not seen it in Firefox for the last couple of versions, either. I'm not that fussed though, as I never did think it was much of an improvement over hitting ctrl-f...

    3. Re:Security by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Enter about:config in the URL bar, the look for "accessibility.typeaheadfind" and set it to true. You may also have to change "accessibility.linksonly" to false too, but I can't remember if I did that or not on this machine...

    4. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please help me.. Tabbed browsing is huge? Yes it's a huge ANNOYANCE for me. I hate programs that have this. That's what the taskbar is for. I want to see a tab down there for every single page/app/etc I have open. Do not group them together, do not only have them within each app, put one down there for each and every instance.

    5. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tabbed browsing is huge ONLY because that's all you ever hear FF zealots talk about. After awhile, very few "converts" I know of continue to use tabs in FF.

      Talk about feeling "dirty". Everytime I open FF to see what's new, I get the impression of coloring with one of the kindergarten super fat crayons rather than an artist's coloring pencil.

    6. Re:Security by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Please help me.. Tabbed browsing is huge? Yes it's a huge ANNOYANCE for me. I hate programs that have this. That's what the taskbar is for. I want to see a tab down there for every single page/app/etc I have open. Do not group them together, do not only have them within each app, put one down there for each and every instance.

      You sound as if you haven't used Firefox as tabbed browsing isn't enabled by default.

      Tabbed browsing is so useful that it's hard to descibe to someone who hasn't tried it.

      Do this: From Firefox, browse to a couple web pages you tend to use frequently, opening each up in a tab. Once you have a set of say 3-6 tabs open, bookmark all tabs and set that group of as your home page.

      Now, use Firefox for a week with your multi-tab 'home page'.

      Occasionally, open up new pages in tabs instead of other windows. See if it grows on you.

      Will you change your mind? Come back in a week or two and tell us.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    7. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lesson learned, Microsoft?

      Yes. EULA does work! That's what EULA is for, protecting the company from lawsuit, even if the company is negligent.

      Microsoft cares nothing about security. Marketshare and feedforcing users come first. Security is only important when it threatens Microsoft's marketshare.

    8. Re:Security by Ganennon · · Score: 1

      Or click Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Begin finding when you begin typing.

    9. Re:Security by Ganennon · · Score: 1

      I used to feel the same way, but after using tabbed browsing for a while, I've realized it's a lot easier to see which 15 pages I'm browsing in the tab bar rather than in the taskbar where there's another 10 tabs. I didn't really love Firefox' tabs until I found the Focus Last Selected Tab extension, though. Nowadays I tab my Eterms too.

    10. Re:Security by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Heh! Oh yeah... errr... damnit!

    11. Re:Security by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Having got the major chunk of the marketshare, they now have time to fix it. This is a longstanding M$ tactic ( probably used by many other companies in many industries ) and, if you're profit-driven, it's a smart move, despite what you or I may think of it.
      That is: get the business FIRST, fix the problems LATER.
      Lesson learned? I doubt it; for them, it doesn't make sense to do things any other way. The most that can be expected is that their design process and bugfix methods improve.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  30. Re:Alternate browser? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Use an alternate browser? Sorry, alternate to what?

    Oh, I don't know ... maybe alternate to the browser that well over 50% of the people use?

    I do have my own complaint about this article, though, in that it is a yet-another-victory-for-firefox, which though nice to hear, would belong in the nothing-to-see-move-along department. I do expect that a disproportionate number of posts will be M$ bashing and boring.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  31. Funny, I got my account disabled for using Firefox by Goosey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At my college the first thing I did on every computer I touched was to install Firefox. I also put Winamp on a few open lab computers for listening to Internet radio while I worked.

    Recently I became unable to login to my student account, with a message "Your account has been disabled, please speak to your network administrator."

    Well I went and found my network administrator to ask about what was up. Apparently it is against school policy to install programs on their computers. This is totally understandable and reasonable, and I apologized. But he decided I needed to be chewed out and he had a killer fact that he just knew would crush me.

    Looking me in the eyes he proceeded to tell me that due to me installing Firefox and Winamp on two of the open lab computers they no longer function and had to be totally reformatted. This man, who is in charge of keeping the school network secure, seriously thinks that Firefox and Winamp could possibly be the root of a computer's DEATH. I did not argue the matter no matter how ridiculous it is; I just wanted my account back.

    How is it they let people become the network administrator for an entire technical college, a college that hands out degrees in technical fields, that are just that ignorant. How can any competent network admin possibly think Firefox and Winamp are causing a computer to not boot?

    So now under threat of permanently losing my student account I am forced to use IE. It is excruciating, because I am not the only person installing software on the open lab computers, just the only one knowledgeable enough to install useful non adware-infested programs. Just opening Internet Explorer results in about 3 minutes of closing popups.

    --
    --- "End Of Line" - MCP
  32. Villinova has done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in the CompSci/Bio lab, there is no IE icon- only a firefox shortcut. Of course, thats only ONE of the labs..

  33. Re:Alternate browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you skip over the title of the article - it is 'Penn State Tells Students To Ditch IE'. In that context, I think its pretty self explanatory what the 'alternative to what' is.

  34. Every ITS Helpdesk should be doing this... by bdigit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At my university I am a student helpdesk worker and everytime someone calls about spyware problems I always recommend they install firefox. Also on the cd of software we include for all 6000 students on campus we have firefox as well as openoffice. No one objects to using firefox and are actually happy to hear that it will make their spyware issues go away.

  35. Dont let them know..... by BicycloHexane · · Score: 0

    that there are other options out there. I get about $50 a pop to clean spyware and malware that gets installed through IE. How else am I going to feed my family if they start using something else!

    1. Re:Dont let them know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By utilizing your brain for learning and doing something that interests you? You only live once, I wouldn't want to remember my accomplishments as uninstalling programs on PC's in the early 21st century.

  36. Article Misleading by dampjam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although Penn State has issued this warning, it is far from true. All Penn State Computer Lab Machines have IE set as the default, and group policy is set such that you cannot switch even to the installed version of Firefox. In addition the Firefox user settings are stored in Application Data which has a 20 meg quota. This means whenever a user tries to log out after browsing, it refuses saying there is too much data. IE on the otherhand, gets cleaned of cookies and cache automatically so that when you log out there is never a problem with the quotas. If Penn State wants to actually get people to switch, they should do something about it on their own machines.

    1. Re:Article Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The lab machines were built on images that were made earlier in the semester, months before this announcement came out. Why not send your note above to CLC? They might have changes planned for the spring semester, or they may have reasons for not being able to make changes to fix the problems you note above.

    2. Re:Article Misleading by __aawavt7683 · · Score: 1

      browser.cache.disk.enable

      Setting that to false, I believe, will cause the disk cache to not be used. My university provides 5MB for the entire windows profile, of which 2.5MB is used by the registry (684k on my home machine; I dunno what they're doing on the lab machines).

      The end result seems to be that, while browsing, I will get space warnings -- it seems to write files to the disk and delete on exit, maybe. Once I exit, I need to wait 30 seconds for it to clean up and everything will go over just fine.

      browser.cache.disk.parent_directory -- "Directory in which to store cache files"

      I think I may've changed this at one point in an effort to keep the application data space free. The problem there is that my university storage (40 MB) is completely full (it's compressed, even) with things I need (Moz Firebird -- 6.4MB, etc). So I believe I ended up removing that, but I'm pretty sure it would work too.

      But, as you may've noticed, I have Moz Firebird (old) on there. The reason for this is I can't store _anything_ in registry (resets each time, as far as I can tell) and FireFox won't install without registry writing ability. I haven't tried the 1.0 release, however. Nor have I tried the zip version, which I've seen only on the FTP... hmm.

      Beyond these two configuration keys, there's a mobile firefox, iirc, which can run simply off a flash drive; all settings must be stored in the app directory or something. That's something worth checking out, perhaps. Good luck with it all.

      http://preferential.mozdev.org/preferences.html

      -DrkShadow

    3. Re:Article Misleading by omicronish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly, the University of Washington, which is across the lake from Microsoft, has made Firefox the default on all CS computers, and possibly on all campus computers as well. IE is still available, but Firefox starts by default.

    4. Re:Article Misleading by biggyfries · · Score: 1

      maybe you should look into this:

      Portable Firefox: http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/portable_firefox/

      FYI, the zip is just like the installer, just not automatic. after unzipping, it is 15.2mb. But, it will run just fine; even my xul pages work.

    5. Re:Article Misleading by dampjam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you even know how they do these machines? Obviously not. All updates and policy changes on this level are made either with MSI packages that are pushed out at 3 AM each night, or by just changing the group policy to allow it. They use WISE professional studio to do silent installs of all packages.

      But perhaps this does not address the true picture. They like IE, IE integrates very well for them, in fact there really is no reason for them to switch lab machines. We do not have admin privledges on lab machines, our profiles are not stored on them, the worst we can do it corrupt our own profile which takes them two seconds to wipe. In an environment like this, there is no advantage for them to follow their own word. This announcement will help our the ResCom staff (residence hall computing, the group that fixes people's dormroom computers). They will have less spyware to uninstall.

    6. Re:Article Misleading by dampjam · · Score: 1

      I use it in the labs so that my laptop profile keeps in sync, my post was more comenting on global policy. If they want to provide firefox to students, the solution is not to have everybody store a firefox executable inside of their server space or on a USB flash stick. They should package the MSI correctly (everything is a silent MSI install) and then have it just work for everybody.

    7. Re:Article Misleading by Myen · · Score: 1
      1. Use the zip version - it should work; just don't try to get it to set itself as default browser.

      2. Go to Explorer and type in
      %appdata%\Application Data\Local Settings
      (with the % signs); use the thing it expands to as browser.cache.disk.parent_directory. That is stored locally but never uploaded back to where your profile is stored.
    8. Re:Article Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hay Young Students, be a little innovative and try one of the LinuxCD based distros (Knoppix, Mepis, SuseLiveCD, MandrakeLive). After you are done, just leave the CD with the computer up and running Linux for other students to use. Eventually the NetAdmin will get the hit and do something about it. Hopefully you do not do that twice because the he will be waiting for you next time you do that.

    9. Re:Article Misleading by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

      And you assume it's going to say that way?

      Maybe part of the reason they made this announcement was to initiate the change.

      btw: the computer labs at Penn State York use IE by default, but you can also use netscape or opera atm

      It all has to do w/ what the local admin wants to do (and any interns that have the power to motivate them)

    10. Re:Article Misleading by finkployd · · Score: 1

      All updates and policy changes on this level are made either with MSI packages that are pushed out at 3 AM each night, or by just changing the group policy to allow it. They use WISE professional studio to do silent installs of all packages.

      I posted it to the NOP PSU mailing list, and I'll post it here again. Firefox MSI Packages

      Finkployd

  37. Interesting by djh888 · · Score: 1

    I go to Penn State and I'm in the school of IST. I know it was ITS that issued the warning from the reading although I never actually recieved an alert. Sort of strange, you think that they would send everyone an email or put it in the college newspaper. I wonder how they actually "alerted" us (the students). Maybe they did put it in the paper and i just missed it... I dunno

    1. Re:Interesting by shadow0324 · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the paper, but the ITS Technews (an opt-in list) had a write-up earlier this week I'm also an IST student at UP)... nice to see it's getting some press nationwide, though!

  38. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    So now under threat of permanently losing my student account I am forced to use IE

    I've heard of running Firefox/Thunderbird off of USB Jump Drives. Then you get to keep your bookmarks too. You'd have a case that you didn't "install" anything on any lab computer.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  39. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you change colleges and go to a real university that has *real* computer programs, not some backwater one that no one knows about. At my university, our student population keeps our IT department on its toes, they know if they screw up, they're will be hell to pay with the student body.

  40. Nothing by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Whats 80,000 compared to their total user base?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Nothing by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      It's 80k that, when they use it and see the virtues of Firefox/Opera/etc., will tell their friends and families of the better alternatives to IE. IF all 80k can get just 1 person to switch, that becomes 160k, and if they get just one person to switch, then that's 320k, etc.

      Microsoft likes to purport that IE is the most used based on merit alone, which is blatantly false. And, as more people start using alternatives (at this point, Firefox being the best for Windows, with it not only being completely free but also extremely small to download), they'll realize Microsoft is so full of shit it isn't even funny.

      And, if IE doesn't get upgraded to match the others, even in Longhorn, people will just stay away and try and get thier friends and family to do the same.

      Hell, I just switched my father over to Firefox on his XP machine because he was full of spy and adware that I had to get rid of. Once I showed him tabbed browsing and the built in pop up blocker, he was hooked.

    2. Re:Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but if one university does it and it gets publicity, then maybe a lot of others will follow.

  41. Publicity stunt by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The college of ed at a major state university where a certain couple famous people recently debated, where I used to work only uses IE on their systems. They also used Windows 98 until recently (now they use XP). During the hay day of blaster and myDoom and whatnot guess which department was the least affected by it all? The College of Ed. Even with all our Win98 boxes being directly on the wire. Even our division of teachers was the least affected. There were a few that turned off automatic update like we told them not to and those were the ones that got it.

    Guess who was most affected by the worms? The engineering department which requires logging onto the domain with your student ID and who run Windows 2000.

    The College of Ed tech support people actually did their job and that prevented a lot of problems. So the fact that the IT people of Penn State are sending out a warning to 80,000 students just makes me laugh.

    Our wonderful IT deparment can't even keep the network running reliably during heavy usage times such as pre-registration week and when grades come out.

    IE and Windows aren't the problem.

    Sending out a rediculous warning e-mail isn't going to do anything for them or the open source movement. People keep telling me the sky is falling and I've yet to see it actually happen to my systems.

    A better solution would be to educate the students on where to get the free VirusScan software from the university and how to keep it up to date along with their Windows system.

    It doesn't matter what browser you're using. It needs to be kept up to date.

    1. Re:Publicity stunt by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IT staff doing their job will both recommend the safest path as well as try to prevent damage. It's wonderful that the university took such steps, but to say that IE isn't the problem is very, very incorrect.

      I see PCs all the time which have IE up to date as well as have up to date anti-virus software that are *still* plagued with problems. Why? IE vulnerabilities.

      Even for a patched system, IE presents a vulnerability for computers that are used for "general" web surfing. Firefox is a perfectly valid recommendation, even for those with up-to-date systems.

    2. Re:Publicity stunt by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "IE and Windows aren't the problem."

      "Our ... IT deparment can't even keep the [Windows] network running...."

      "...educate the students on where to get the free [Windows] VirusScan software..."

      Windows isn't the problem, yet the Windows network dies upon a mild to moderate pounding? Windows isn't the problem, yet you need special software to make sure someone isn't automatically installing malicious software behind your back and without your approval?

      Am I the only one amused by this?

    3. Re:Publicity stunt by Foolhardy · · Score: 1
      yet the Windows network dies upon a mild to moderate pounding?
      Under incompetent administration. Incompetence can make anything bad possible.
      yet you need special software to make sure someone isn't automatically installing malicious software behind your back and without your approval?
      By what magic is this happening from a normal accout? Surely you aren't running as admin all the time; you don't do everything as root on UNIX do you?
  42. Hasn't firefox et al reached... by eeg3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...the level of prosperity where it's not shocking when people or organizations ditch IE for it? Firefox is the obvious better choice, this shouldn't be 'news'.

  43. ditch paterno, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if they can just get rid of the football coach next.

    1. Re:ditch paterno, too. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      joepa's just like Internet Explorer. Bloated, outdated, unresponsive, he's having a negative affect on the whole department, and he's next to impossible to get rid of.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  44. But... by dhassler · · Score: 0

    I may have missed something but my experience is that Windows Update only works with IE. Are they just trading one security risk for another? On the subject of Windows Update only working with IE - How does this fit with Microsoft's supposedly not forcing customers to use IE?

    1. Re:But... by flokemon · · Score: 1

      When you click on Windows Update in the Start Menu, it opens an IE window, not whatever your default browser is. That's Windows XP behaviour I'm sure, and Windows 2000 I believe.

      You also need to be admin to run Windows Update, at least doing it that way. (I'm afraid I don't know much about automatic updates, as that is the first thing I disable :) Ok, students on the campus are going to use their personal computers with whatever account they usually use, but computers in the library etc? They would be incompetent if they let student use admin accounts on those.

      And if you are talking of automatic updates, I don't see how using an alternative browser could prevent them from working?

  45. the headline should be "From the Big Frikken by EllynGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Department of Duh." Sheesh. Windoze lusers have to be most impervious people on earth. How many times do their systems have to get compromised before they dimly ponder alternatives? Infinity -1, apparently.

    --

    we will end no whine before its time

    1. Re:the headline should be "From the Big Frikken by linguae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most Windows users don't know anything about the alternatives. Remember that the majority Windows users are very uneducated about computers other than knowing how to move a mouse and click stuff. Microsoft and Dell/HP/Gateway/etc. sold millions of these computers because of "ease of use" and because of relatively low cost (compared to, say, a Macintosh; to most of these types of users, they'd buy the $399 Dell or HP over the $799 eMac, even though the eMac is more full-featured and immune to Windows malware), but because MS can't build a secure OS until just a few months ago (IE soldered with the OS shell, give me a break!), the users must suffer. Because of the users' ignorance about computers, they think that these browser vulnerabilities and other insecurities are just part of living in a computerized world. They are also very hidden from alternatives as well, because they simply don't know (these people aren't the ones browsing Slashdot and Kuro5hin every day, or any other tech-related site, so how would they find out about Firefox and *nix from, say, where most casual users browse the most at?).

      If only had the competitors put up a better fight against MS 10-15 years ago (Apple with Taligent/Copland, NeXT with NEXTSTEP, IBM with OS/2), then the computing would might be very different.

  46. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by octothorpe · · Score: 1

    Look, I don't see how installing winamp and firefox could kill the OS (although this is windows we're talking about) but you were installing software on someone elses computer, you deserved to get yelled at. On the other hand, why is anyone allowed to install software on a lab machine? We have some WinXP machines in our lab and no one but the lab admin can install anything on them.

  47. My University did this a month ago. by fuzzybassoon · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's been the onofficial policy for my University's helpdesk to install FireFox on any students' computers, particularly if they've been having Spyware problems. Here's part of an e-mail sent out on Nov. 5 to the entire Yale Community.

    To Selected Members of the Yale Community:

    We wanted to send you an important reminder about your privacy and
    security while browsing the Internet. We are concerned about certain
    vulnerabilities inherent in Microsoft Internet Explorer (MSIE). Even if
    you do not use this application as your browser, you should consider a
    read through for information about keeping your computer updated.

    Due to its popularity, MSIE has increasingly been the target of technical
    exploits and sophisticated "phishing" schemes. We strongly encourage you
    to take certain precautions for your own security:

    1. First and foremost, verify that your computer is updated with current
    patches and updates. The best and easiest way to do this is to set your
    computer to automatically update its operating system and antivirus
    software. If you need assistance doing this, please see below for contact
    information.

    2. There are known vulnerabilities in MSIE that do not yet have patches.
    This has happened in the past and appears likely to happen again in the
    future. We recommend that you either:

    a) Refrain from visiting unknown websites or providing personal or
    financial information while using MSIE, unless you are absolutely certain
    you are dealing with a truly reputable website (for example the CDW-G
    website in the Yale ePortal).

    b) Use an alternative web browser such as Mozilla or Safari. The Yale
    Software Library (www.yale.edu/software) provides recommended alternatives
    that are easy to install and provide the same basic functionalities as
    MSIE. There are some web pages that will only display properly in MSIE
    (since it contains certain special proprietary functions), but most web
    browsing can be accomplished using the alternatives.

    1. Re:My University did this a month ago. by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      "Here's part of an e-mail sent out on Nov. 5 to the entire Yale Community. To Selected Members of the Yale Community:" uh-hu

      --
      IAAL
    2. Re:My University did this a month ago. by fuzzybassoon · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, I meant to say to the entire student body.

  48. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by kaleco · · Score: 1

    This is true, I put Firefox 0.8 onto my uni network space, no installation required. I'm not sure how well this will work for 1.0.

    --
    Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge
  49. But it's fixable. by ulatekh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Will this ITS department support issues with other browsers. Each browser has its quirks, and work arounds for certain things.

    But Firefox, being open-source, can be fixed so as to eliminate the need for workarounds. The IT department can coordinate with the project developers and find solutions. Something closed-source doesn't do nearly as well.

    As annoyed as I am with Microsoft in general, if they would make the Windows XP source code shared-source, I'd track down and fix bugs I found. I wouldn't mind. I'd be Microsoft's biggest fan if their stuff would just work worth a crap.

    --
    "Once we've identified and embraced our sickness, we'll have strength...and that's when we get dangerous." - John Waters
    1. Re:But it's fixable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      solutions. Something

      "solutions, something".

  50. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How can any competent network admin possibly think Firefox and Winamp are causing a computer to not boot?

    You are dealing with a Windows admin. For many of them, the common reason for everything is that the problem is someone else's fault. That someone else being a combination of Microsoft, Firefox, Winamp, the computer's mood that day, some virus, "an act of God," or hackers that don't really exist. Don't take it personally.

  51. A good start... by Mori+Chu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most college admins' time is spent dealing with student spyware. IE is a big source of it (though not the only one). Something's got to give. I think it's a great idea to recommend installing Firefox and to lock out machines with spyware run amok. I'd think that mandating Ad-Aware and/or SpyBot would be an even bigger help. I don't know the feasibility, but if they could force any connecting machine to identify itself as having SP2 installed, that by itself would be a huge start. They just don't have the time to deal with unprotected machines.

    1. Re:A good start... by sloanster · · Score: 1

      I'd think that mandating Ad-Aware and/or SpyBot would be an even bigger help. I don't know the feasibility, but if they could force any connecting machine to identify itself as having SP2 installed, that by itself would be a huge start. They just don't have the time to deal with unprotected machines.

      Just to point out the obvious, mandating the install of pc spyware/adware programs could only apply to those computers running a microsoft OS. The tech savvy folks using linux, OSX or other unixlike OS are not part of the problem, and the pc spyware/adware/worm/virus plague has no base platform other than microsoft windows. Obviously, it would be worse than useless to mandate universal installation of such windows software on all computers. :)

    2. Re:A good start... by Devalia · · Score: 1

      Theres a vague system at my uni in the UK - on registering for the "dorm" service it seems to check if your windows computer is updated -- ive only registered once for a friend tho on windows so not sure how it works etc!

  52. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by johnnybaluba · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then you should have a look at portable firefox: http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/portable_firefox/ or here http://portablefirefox.mozdev.org/ (within the next week)

  53. You should educate him about Norton Ghost by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    The tech support deparment I worked in for a state uni kept a Ghost image of the student machines so if they became screwed up it was a quick automated task to fix the problem.

    "Just opening Internet Explorer results in about 3 minutes of closing popups"

    So why were you putting your head in the sand by installing two pieces of software that had nothing to do with the problem? No wonder you got chewed out. You using FireFox and Winamp aren't doing anything to help.

    If you want to make yourself useful you should have downloaded AdAware and cleaned up the system for them and then went to Windows Update and patched the system like engineers like to not do. Then, when AdAware is done getting rid of the pop-up problem you uninstall it and no one knows. And, you actually fixed the problem.

    Rather than just breaking policy which is there to prevent unneeded crap from being installed and bogging down the system. If you can install your toys so can all the students and now the system is unusable and needs to be reimaged.

    1. Re:You should educate him about Norton Ghost by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      Firefox does fix the pop-up problem. Firefox by default won't let a page open a window except in onClicks and such events, IE does.

      Where I go to school (which happens to be a public high school) the native network is Mac OS, which sucked in previous years because they hadn't updated it. Now that the computers are running OSX it is a very respectable network. However they also decided they'd run a few systems with Windows. Horrible idea, they use Internet Explorer, Windows 98, and of course this means that they're vulnerable to almost all the drive-by installers out there, which students will tend to browse to ("Check out this Flash game!").

      With the admins used to Macs, the introduction of Windows labs is a terrible idea, especially when they refuse to use an updated OS, and a security-flaw-prone version of the browser. They also don't put an admin password on the BIOSes, so I wind up checking that first, to see if someone screwed up the boot order, or disabled the ethernet card (I've seen both these).

    2. Re:You should educate him about Norton Ghost by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can also use a program like Deep Freeze to restore computers to default configuration at regular intervals, like at night or at every logout or reboot. This is usually better than restoring from an image because it's faster.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:You should educate him about Norton Ghost by Spoing · · Score: 1

      If the admin doesn't know about Ghost or similar tools they have other more serious problems.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  54. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


    You should ask the admin why he allowed common users to install software in the first place. I bet he doesn't even know how to prevent that.

    I recommend not storing any of your personal files on computers he manages, because they'll probably be e-mailed to the world by a worm, soon.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  55. WinAmp and the MBR by kingkade · · Score: 0, Troll

    When you install winamp an option to install a component into the machine's MBR may have been chosen in the default full install. This enables a WinAmp [Boot] Agent to load itself before calling the ntldr, thus allowing the machine to be configured to play a MIDI, AU or MP3 stream at the splash while the machine boots. Also, there was a security advisory for WinAmp 5.03, if that has anything to do with it.

    Cheers, HTH

    1. Re:WinAmp and the MBR by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on the actions of the Winamp agent.

      It loads during windows startup - after a user has logged in, certainly not before the ntldr.

      Show me a link to the problem you identify (The 2 you posted are to do with other issues).

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:WinAmp and the MBR by Safety+Cap · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      >When you install winamp an option to install a component into the machine's MBR ~.

      Either you don't know anything about low-level disk functions, or you are a Mac user. Or both.

      I'll drop a troll-pellet, though:

      Please explain to us what "component" WinAmp writes to the MBR, specifically, what sectors/tracks are written, and with what data. Also, please explain how WinAmp bypasses the HAL.

      Thank you.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    3. Re:WinAmp and the MBR by numark · · Score: 1

      I'm a Mac user, and I even know better than that.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    4. Re:WinAmp and the MBR by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 0, Troll
      Actually, I have had crashes that I was able to relate to Winamp before.

      One of the things Winamp does/did is bind to the CD autoplay feature.

      In practice that means if I insert some software-only CD Roms into the drive, and installed some pieces of software from it, several minutes through the install -boom! The hard-locked/dead OS wasn't really very communicative about exactly what had gone on. It didn't effect every install, but some software became completely uninstallable.

      Either way, on two different machines, uninstall Winamp, and the problem went away. Reinstall- the problem came back. Gack!

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    5. Re:WinAmp and the MBR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey troll-troller, some of us Unix folk happen to like our PowerBooks. Kindly remove the "Mac user" jokes. 1996 wants them back.

  56. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


    How is it they let people become the network administrator for an entire technical college, a college that hands out degrees in technical fields, that are just that ignorant.

    Because technical colleges are a joke as far as technology degrees are concerned. They also probbably pay jack shit to a network administrator, so they wind up with people who believe in computer voodoo. i.e. "it must have been that mysterious fire-fox and win-amp that those damn kids are all hopped up on these days." Remember, to anyone non-technical it's often hard to tell the difference between a good network administrator and a bad network administrator.

    --
    AccountKiller
  57. Maybe because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IE sucks.

    Jon

  58. Feel sorry for the IT departments by eneville · · Score: 0, Troll

    Students are going to be asking: 1) Duh does my intarweb still work? 2) Wheres my popups gone? 3) Why doesn't the flash movies work? 4) What are these tab thingys? 5) Whats a book mark?

    1. Re:Feel sorry for the IT departments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a book?

    2. Re:Feel sorry for the IT departments by eneville · · Score: 1

      It's only after college that I have started reading more text books. I only read C++ while I was studying, now I'm reading all sorts, I'm more interested in learning things now that I'm exploring more ideas.

    3. Re:Feel sorry for the IT departments by amrust · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have modded this "troll". Being the go-to IT guy for an office full of non-tech types, I can totally predict a similar response if I attempted to switch our office away from IE. People resist change, and fear the unknown. If it so much as looks slightly different than it did yesterday, it's never going to be as good (to some people). Sure, they'd be in the minority, but they know my number, and wouldn't be afraid to ruin my life, until I switched it back.

      --
      VOTE!
  59. sigh by Phil246 · · Score: 1

    this wasnt intended as a flamebait :(, he genuinely does tell us to get a life for liking ie or windows. furthermore he has told us that getting a mac is a good idea.
    Personally im not keen on macs , hence "problem is"

  60. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Goosey · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that suggestion, I will give that a try. Assuming of course that I get a USB minidrive as an Xmas gift like I asked for. ;)

    --
    --- "End Of Line" - MCP
  61. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How can any competent network admin possibly think Firefox and Winamp are causing a computer to not boot"

    if he where competent he would make it impssible for
    users to install software.

    if it's not allowed by the rules but the os still allows people to install software he must be incompetent.

  62. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by whovian · · Score: 1

    I've heard of running Firefox/Thunderbird off of USB Jump Drives. Then you get to keep your bookmarks too. You'd have a case that you didn't "install" anything on any lab computer

    But in that case, when you cross the path of an ignorant, overzealous "sysadmin", you will get chewed out or flagged for disciplinary action for attempting to bypass security.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  63. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Goosey · · Score: 1

    Apparently it is against school policy to install programs on their computers. This is totally understandable and reasonable, and I apologized.

    --
    --- "End Of Line" - MCP
  64. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, your administrators may not be aware of this, but Stark is not a state. Further, they forgot to put ironic quotation marks around the world "college" on their web site.

    I'm going to be frank. You do not want to graduate from this school. America has been overrun with fake colleges and universities for the last 40 years. This is one of them. You should transfer to a real school while there is still some time left. Please take this advice to heart, because I am far from kidding.

  65. Re:i got a friend there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call bullshit on your anecdote. Reason: Firefox hasn't been around for two years.

  66. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should walk back up to him and tell him he's a wanker and he should perhaps consider locking the machines down before users do perfectly normal things to them.

    For most large organisations, reinstalling a machine is a simple task, and not worthy of the bollocking you appear to have had.

    His concerns about software on the machines are technically justified however, not such for the initial application, but from the plugins system in place. Both allow unsigned extensions to be added which screw the mix up.
    The solution is to prevent user software installation in the first place, and any admin not doing that isn't doing their job.

    Instead of pasting HIS mail address, perhaps you should take your concerns (anonymously if required) further up the ladder.

    One other slight matter, Internet Explorer ISN'T spyware infested, I managed quite well for years running it and haven't had any spyware or crap running on this machine. It is the workman rather than the tools he uses.

  67. My previous employer has gone backwards. by DrStrangeLug · · Score: 5, Interesting
    3 years ago I worked at a small college in the SW United Kingdom, and when the Internet became "The Big Thing" we used Netscape and then Mozilla as our browser base.

    They've recently been merged with/taken over by a larger college in a nearby town, and the surviving IT department is in the process of converting the site from :

    • A Corel WP Suite & OpenOffice mix to MS Office
    • Groupwise to Outlook
    • Mozilla to I.E.


    Common Sense doesn't always win.
    1. Re:My previous employer has gone backwards. by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Its likely the case that the larger colledge who bought you out was already using MS office, Outlook and IE for everything and didnt want to have the hassle of maintaining 2 different software setups. Therefore, the setup with the larger installed base (which is probobly the MS setup) becomes the supported setup which evertone uses.

    2. Re:My previous employer has gone backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the group of colleges that I go to in the area. Common Sense is thrown out of the window and most of management have their heads shoved deep in a very dark place.

  68. IE is evil by h311sp0n7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A couple of months ago I was trying to convince the head of ITS at my work to switch to Mozilla. When Firefox went 1.0 he obliged and we did a complete rollout to all clients. The only real problem being that many Web programmers do not conform to W3C standards and only build applications that are compatible with IE. Personally, I do not use IE and have not for a long time, but the pages that I do create conform to W3C standards. The move to any browser is dependant on how pages are written. More of the IT/programming world should take this into account if we are to see a greater move away from M$ IE

    1. Re:IE is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you looked like a dumbshit when all those pages quit working. I'm sure the head of IT was repremanded for changing without adequate testing--as he should have been. The fact that most web programmers don't conform to W3C is not MS's fault as IE is not a standards compliance-testing tool. Apparently, if you feed ill-formed HTML to many browsers, FF included, you can crash them.

  69. ASU Honors by Wraith2414 · · Score: 1

    Arizona State University's honors college recommended this same step to their students about a month ago. I certainly hope this trend continues at academic institutions. N.

    1. Re:ASU Honors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ASU used to have a very good support for "alternative" OSes. They had a pretty decent setup and support for their Macs, too. Is this still the case? Near the end of my program, Wintel drones started to take over and screwed things up.

  70. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    What security?

    a USER can install anything they want on the system.

    In my book thats the fucked up system admins problem.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  71. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    Pardon my ignorance, but hasn't been running Firefox from a single executable without installing always been an easy option?

    I remember the beta versions that would unzip to a single directory, and clicking the executable would run the browser without running any form of setup.exe or other installation file.

    Has the program changed that much where special tweaks and hacks are required to make it a standalone executable?

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  72. Project by utlemming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    During a major network reworking project at a college apartment complex, my partner and I recommend that the comlpex go over to Firefox. The interesting thing is that some of the tenats referred to the new internet at "Firefox" internet, as opposed to "Internet Explorer" internet. And even better was the fact that several of the tenats asked where they could get his new "internet." Out of the people over in the complex nearly half have switched over to Firefox. The exposure of Firefox actually started in their Internet lounge. And since people saw that the complex was using Firefox they started to what it. So I think that the best way to get some of these alternative standards-based browsers out is for exposure in main stream enviroments.

    --
    The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  73. My college. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My college has been trying to put Firefox on there student computers. The problem is that IE always wants to be the default browser and the students cant simply us Firefox, they always click on IE and make it the default again. It's a constant battle so it's not necessarily the computers fault it has security flaws it's the users always choosing the wrong browser.

    1. Re:My college. by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      So "uninstall" IE. Problem solved.

    2. Re:My college. by MegaManXcalibur · · Score: 1

      That might make getting Windows Updates rather difficult.

      Instead of "uninstalling" Internet Explorer just go to Start->Control Panel->Internet Options.

      When the dialog box appears click the Programs tab and uncheck "Internet Explorer should check to see if it is the default browser" at the bottom.

  74. Additional links and story details by NASAdude · · Score: 3, Informative

    I submitted this same story with a lot more detail (but not the InformationWeek link) 28 hours prior to the timestamp on this story. It was rejected. Sure, mod me off-topic if you think I'm whining.

    I posted my write-up in my journal for posterity's sake. Replies are welcome on this post in regards to the actual news story. Comments as to why you think the submission was rejected should only be posted in the journal. (You don't want to be off-topic, right?) Did I submit at the wrong time of day? Was the submission too long? Ok... enough whining.

    I won't make you do unnecessary clicking, so here are some of the relevant links that I found:
    Penn State's own news article
    Chronicle of Higher Education article
    ZDnet article

    The journal entry also has comments taken from a PSU IT personnel listserv, as well as other links.

    1. Re:Additional links and story details by twistedcubic · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't care that your story was rejected. In the grand scheme of things, Slashdot is, well, nothing. Posting this does make you look like you are whining, because most people don't care about such things. Anyway, a better solution might be to create your own news site, or contribute to one that you consider more fair.

    2. Re:Additional links and story details by RealBorg · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, all my story submissions have been rejected for no reason as well, posting them in the journal sounds like a good idea, maybe slashdot will be forced to see the light when some people's journals get a whole lot more interesting than the start page.

  75. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Recovery1 · · Score: 1

    That is if you get windows to recognize the USB drive. Our school computers won't recognize anything plugged into the USB ports. I had to get the administrator to set my account up so I could plug in my digital camera and access it. Fortunately the administrator for our school is much nicer. You can approach him and ask to have software installed, and he usually will install it for you.

  76. Windows Update by swirvbox · · Score: 1

    You do not have to use IE/Windows Update. XP does a good job with Automatic updates. Plus if you have SP2 installed it naggs you about auto updates. I personaly havent used IE on this box in months.

    1. Re:Windows Update by wk633 · · Score: 1

      You can also always download and install patches manually. Sure, the requirements hierarchy is insane, but it's theoretically possible. I used to maintain an install script/set of hotfixes to take a Win2K server to 'current'. That was in 2001 when 'current' wasn't quite so hard.

  77. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Foolhardy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm going to school at Baker College and at my campus, they've got Deep Freeze on all the computers. You are logged on as admin* and can install whatever you want, but when the computer is restarted it goes back to its original condition. It installs a filter driver that keeps track of all writes to the main disk, logs them and prepares to undo them upon restart. All your documents/files you want to keep are put on removable media (they'll get undone upon restart otherwise). Authorized admins can disable this temporairily to make permanent changes. Turn on a computer and it is in pristene condition; no crap, regardless of what the previous user did. This might not be so good for home use, but for the pre-installed standard lab environment needed for the computers, it works beautifully.
    I would definately recommend Deep Freeze for any place with requirements like this. Put all the user profiles and documents on a central server, cluster or removable media and make permanent local changes impossible.
    Viruses on the document storage area should be the only malware left; if you put it on a server, it can be scanned easily.

    * It's not quite full admin, as you can't install new services or drivers; they might mess with Deep Freeze.

  78. OT warning. by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Love that sig. I got an awesome shirt a few years back with that sig on the front. It was a ray troll shirt, he's quite an artist.

    Can't find a link for that art, but you'll like this one by the same dude:

    http://www.trollart.com/trollart_toplinks/nolunc h. html

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  79. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by sahonen · · Score: 1

    Amen. I took a television production program at a "prestigious" local corporately-owned "college." Then I found out that the degree was next to worthless in the eyes of local employers (and other schools, even other schools owned by the same company), their much-hyped job placement was useless (especially since they were flooding the job market with more people than jobs), and I didn't learn a single thing that I hadn't already learned from just going out and working on shoots for free.

    As a result of this, I'm very suspicious of any school that's not a nationally recognized university, especially if it's corporately-owned. I'm going to the University of Minnesota now and doing freelance studio and sports camerawork and video photography on the side.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  80. At Harvard... by thefultonhow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I go to Harvard University, and am a User Assistant -- basically, a student-employee of Computer Services who helps undergrads with computer problems. Our policy whenever someone comes in with a problem, be it a virus or spyware or even a simple problem with Eudora, is to install Firefox. I have never had a user object, and when I show them some features like tabbed browsing, they really warm to the browser. One girl even said that she used DeadAIM primarily for the tabs and loved it that Firefox came with such a feature too.

    Of course, the best thing is that once the user is firewalled and virus-protected and has SP2 and Firefox, he or she will probably never come into the Clinic again!

    1. Re:At Harvard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One girl even said that she used DeadAIM primarily for the tabs and loved it that Firefox came with such a feature too."

      So did you get laid?

  81. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by takeya · · Score: 1

    Hmm my school computers all have limited accounts, so I've "installed", that is unzipped, opera as well as a few useful programs on them.

    The teacher really can't say anything because it's all happening from our accounts which we are basically allowed to do anything on, until we get into hacking or something.

  82. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by snarkya · · Score: 1

    My organization has foolishly ignored the warnings against using IE, and refuses to authorize the installation of Firefox on company PCs, so in the spirit of self-preservation, I use Personal Firefox on a USB key drive. Nothing is installed on the PC, so I'm within the regulations. Might be a solution for you, too.

  83. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Autobahn · · Score: 1

    How can any competent network admin possibly think Firefox and Winamp are causing a computer to not boot?

    One of my friends in college was running an FTP server out of his dorm room. He had pretty much maxed out his 10Base connection and was trying to find some way to tap into the college's backbone since all of the dorms only had 10 megabits.

    But before he could do that the head of IT called him in for using too much bandwidth. My friend was a little worried because our college had pretty strict bandwidth policies and he stood to lose his account permanently. But when he went in, the first thing this guy (who makes >$150k) says is "Son, do you know you're using 13 megabits of bandwidth?" On a 10 megabit connection. Right. My friend stopped worrying after that.

  84. not Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell is that post Insightful ?

    I could barely understand if 'People still use IE'
    was considered funny but this is a self-serving "look how smart I am" comment.
    On the other hand if the person really isnt aware that IE use is prevalent then maybe a dose of reality would help.

  85. Re:i got a friend there by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

    Speaking of bullshit...

    By the way, check the date on 0.1. It says "2002-09-23". If you can't do the math, that's more than two years.

  86. This isn't really hurting Microsoft by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

    Since IE isn't sold alone, people switching to other browsers isn't hurting their income.

    With IE bundled with the OS, IE dominance, and so therefore MS's own web standards are not ever going to be threatened by people obtaining and using other browsers now.

    All that anti-trust stuff has accomplished exactly nothing unless Microsoft are forced to uncouple IE (and Media Player) from the operating system, and they are forced to stop pressuring PC retailers into not supplying other operating systems.

    In fact there needs to be a 5 year period where it is illegal for anyone to sell a single-booting pre installed widows computer in order to counteract the last 20 years of anti-competitive behavior.

    1. Re:This isn't really hurting Microsoft by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Since IE isn't sold alone, people switching to other browsers isn't hurting their income.

      Yes it does. IE creates demand for their server side solutions, and establishes OS lock-in.

      Nobody is going to use uberkewl longhorn XAMLServer edition for web apps (which would conveniently require Windows, of course) if they've been using a XUL equivalent for years in Firefox.

  87. firefox by MindDelay · · Score: 1

    i work at my school's network/computer help desk and we constantly recommend firefox. we even have the installation file on the school's website for students to download. hopefully ie will lose a lot more users soon.

    --
    Spiral out. Keep going...
  88. when would Temple Learn its lesson by anand78 · · Score: 0

    I work as a grad assistant and part of my chore was to clean up the adware downloaded by my co-workers. The only solution I could come up was to link the "e" icon to firefox and lo and behold my job became so easy. I had a CIS person visit our department once and while fixing entirely another problem relating to Printers, this dude said that it was mozilla that was causing problem. I tried to haggle with this guy for some time that he was wrong. Nochallantly I asked him what his degree was, he had a nursing degree. I said this answer my question. I tried sending the advantages of Mozilla over IE but till now Temple is stuck to IE.

  89. Support is important. by twitter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The students already knew, but they also know that they were going to have lame brained problems if they used an alternate browser. Having the computing department come out and say this is a big boots for them. Staff may also be relieved by this.

    Sometimes, thanks to clueless professors, I've needed to use IE. I actually talked to two professors about using standards instead of cheap development tools that foist garbage on their students and would require expensive software and break in a year or two. It was like talking to a brick wall and they could care less. I was polite, and I can only hope that they remember me and think, "hmmm, that guy was right."

    Having a University policy in place would be great. The line, "Use a standard browser" would no longer work. More importantly, stuff that does not work with Mozilla or Konqueror would get fixed and that would spare me a few trips to the library.

    A policy like that would also be nice for the staff. Morons who think Microsoft is some kind of standard would get the message loud and clear. More importantly, this removes any kind of lingering FUD about the University not "supporting" alternate browsers. I'm sure the IT staff would love it too because they are the ones who get to spend the all nighters and who bear the embarrassment of turning off whole dorms and sections of campus when the next M$ born worm crawls through.

    This kind of transition has been happening at my University but slowly. The student log in still has an advertisement for Microsoft software on the first page but all the public kiosks in the Union have been converted to Linux terminals running Mozilla. The continuing security dissaster is finally getting solved with something other than the blame the user game.

    It's nice to hear some good news coming from Penn State.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Support is important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      M$

      Willy, please stop.

    2. Re:Support is important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a fuck. It sounds like you're the fanatical syncophant, dedicated to stalking this insignificant poster. Mods, don't mod this idiot up.

    3. Re:Support is important. by Axem · · Score: 1

      Moderators are supposed to moderate the post, not the poster. Karma in the long run will decide whether he should be made louder or quieter. If you don't like it, make him an enemy and put all enemies to -6.

      --
      We all live in a #FFFF00 submarine...
    4. Re:Support is important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...all the public kiosks in the Union have been converted...

      Dude! I think the civil war ended a few years ago.

    5. Re:Support is important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's good to see staff with big boots. but what happens when they retire? those will be some big boots to fill! oh, kill me please.

    6. Re:Support is important. by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

      To turn off a whole dorm here they just pull a plug from a fiber optic socket. They do this with impunity if a worm gets loose inside one of the dorms. They like Firefox though and it is required on ever computer. Most people don't use it though because they don't know.

    7. Re:Support is important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Willy, everybody knows it's "Micro$haft" or "Micro$cum" or "overcompensation for Billy's limp penis".

  90. #1a by Trillan · · Score: 1

    My money is on a variant of #1: They won't even notice.

  91. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Quixote · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Just went to your college's homepage, and was quite surprised to see a "homeland security threat condition" graphic on the homepage!

    If this is their public face, it most likely means that the place is run by total dicks. You're better off switching to a different school.

  92. Re:He's not all that smart by Sj0 · · Score: 1


    Being attacked by the parent you're replying to is actually funny, because he doesn't seem to have taken a look at the dates involved. I've been so busy I haven't even been able to look at the code for my projects or update my site since march. Look at all the free time I have! Wheeee!

    If a site that hasn't been updated in 6 months and a year old rant written while I was drunk are all you've got, I can honestly say my life isn't so bad. Busy so I can't return to my old projects or spend time writing journal entries nobody will read, but not so bad.

    Anyway, two responses in this thread is more than enough for me. I've got semiconductors homework to do.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  93. Integration nonsense. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Looks like IE get burned by the very same 'feature' that allowed it to get 95% market share : integration with Windows and total access to stuff it shouldn't.

    It's funny how KDE does not suffer the same kinds of problems despite having better "integration". Ease of use does not have to be a security nightmare. With Konqueror, I have access to sftp, ftp and other network shares as if they were local files, drag and drop easy with split screens and multiple tabs. Floppy and CD mounting are as easy as clicking icons on my desktop. What really burnt M$ was pumping money into marketing instead of fixing their broken junk. According to the closed source apologists, getting these new features is supposed to be as cheap and easy as looking at the free source code.

    Now I look at IE (the rare time I need to open it for windowsupdate) and it just feels...dirty.

    I feel the same way about the whole single desktop, single user, spyware loaded GUI. I just don't trust it and know that there are far better alternatives out there.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Integration nonsense. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way about the whole single desktop,

      A power toy available from MS and the Nvidia drivers provide multiple desktop support; I've not used a non Nvidia card in years, so I can't comment on other manufacturers, but I'd expect their drivers to offer similar functionality.

      single user,

      The NT line is multi-user in that users are/can be completely separate. The Server line is truly multi-user in that you can have mulitple users logged on to and using the machine simultaneously.

      spyware loaded GUI.

      Don't use IE or Outlook/Outlook Express, use a firewall (as you should for any system), and you'll be fine - I have been for the 7+ years that I've owned a PC.

      Linux is less susceptible to eploits than Windows, I'll give you that, but a lot of malware requires user intervention to install, and there's nothing that Linux can do to prevent that. Cluesless users will always be a danger to themselves, their PCs and the network, whatever OS they're using. If/when they switch to Linux, so will the malware writers.

    2. Re:Integration nonsense. by twitter · · Score: 1
      A power toy available from MS and the Nvidia drivers provide multiple desktop support; I've not used a non Nvidia card in years, so I can't comment on other manufacturers, but I'd expect their drivers to offer similar functionality.

      My little brother had one of those in an old Dell 650 PIII. Performance was very poor, which is astonishing. Multiple desktops in the Linux world work well for hardware as modest as a 90 MHz PI and 16 MB of RAM, such as my old laptop.

      The NT line is multi-user in that users are/can be completely separate. The Server line is truly multi-user in that you can have multiple users logged on to and using the machine simultaneously.

      I've only seen this work with Magic Twin from Jetway. It did indeed use the windows API for it's time slicing, but required extensive hardware support. Worse, as far as I know, you still have to run things like IE and Outlook with root privs. At the same time, my old P90 works great as a card reader and I don't have any problems using it that way while my wife surfs the web with it using a ssh forwared browser from yet another computer. Windoze multiuser ability is anemic and adds nothing to the security of the system.

      Don't use IE or Outlook/Outlook Express, use a firewall (as you should for any system), and you'll be fine - I have been for the 7+ years that I've owned a PC.

      Why bother with windows at all? What does it offer that you can't find in the free software world? Why should I recommend it to anyone? What exactly are you trying to tell me, besides Winblows might not suck as badly as I think it does?

      ... a lot of malware requires user intervention to install, and there's nothing that Linux can do to prevent that.

      Mac, Linux and Solaris operating experience contradicts that line of reasoning. Blame the user is a poor excuse when you could just adopt a sane networking and user privs model.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    3. Re:Integration nonsense. by NCraig · · Score: 1
      What does it offer that you can't find in the free software world?
      Microsoft Office.
      Why should I recommend it to anyone?
      Nobody asked you to.
      What exactly are you trying to tell me, besides Winblows might not suck as badly as I think it does?
      Not even Jenna Jameson sucks as much as you think 'Winblows' does.
    4. Re:Integration nonsense. by Spoing · · Score: 0
      What really burnt M$

      ...that's where I stopped reading.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    5. Re:Integration nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...that's where I stopped reading.

      If only you would also stop writing. I could care less and think stuff like that is just another part of the crap flood.

    6. Re:Integration nonsense. by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. If only you would also stop writing. I could care less and think stuff like that is just another part of the crap flood.

      The cry of an AC...how noble.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  94. This is a touch off-topic, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just (as in less than an hour ago) purchased a new notebook. I had no idea just how completely Microsoft has covered the OEM computer market until now. Of the three companies I called, none would send me a notebook without an operating system, and all three stated that it was a requirement of their licence agreement with Microsoft.

    I just paid Microsoft for an operating system that I am going to wipe out as soon as I open the shipping box.

    If I were to say I didn't agree with the EULA or something, does anyone know if I can get something back? It's not so much about the money as who ends up with it. The company from which I purchased my new system is Gateway, BTW.

    1. Re:This is a touch off-topic, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask them to send one with FreeDOS?

    2. Re:This is a touch off-topic, but... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny
      I just paid Microsoft for an operating system that I am going to wipe out as soon as I open the shipping box. [...] It's not so much about the money as who ends up with it. The company from which I purchased my new system is Gateway, BTW.
      It's your own fault for buying a major name brand.
      People should not buy Gateway, or Dell, or HP, or whatever.
      I bought my logo-chiseled-off-with-a-blunt-screwdriver laptop from Fell-Off-a-Truck, Inc. (their Back-of-a-Van-in-the-Safeway-Parking-Lot branch), and I'm pretty sure that Microsoft didn't get a penny of my money, even though the laptop came with MS-Windows XP (Ukranian version) pre-installed (along with a file containing thousands of credit card numbers, a directory named "CIA Dirty Tricks", and lots and lots of porn).
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  95. Re:He's not all that smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay, dumbwad, how many times do we have to explain this to you? IT IS = IT'S; IT possessive = IT'S.

    so close and yet so far...

  96. user education; adminthink by bcrowell · · Score: 1
    It all comes down to educating users. Changing software is no substitute for that. At the school where I teach, one of my colleagues got her AOL account 0wned because she'd picked her dog's name as her password, on the theory that nobody would be able to guess it; it's not a dumb or unreasonable thing to do, but it indicates that she'd never been educated about dictionary attacks. Another of my colleagues, when I urged him to switch to Firefox for security reasons, responded that he didn't have anything on his computer that he needed to keep secret; again, not an intrindically stupid statement, just indicative of a lack of knowledge about worms and zombiefied Windows boxes.

    You also have to think about this from the adminstrators' point of view. At my school, academic computing is seriously understaffed, so they don't want to support more than one OS and one browser. My school also recently had a big hubbub over someone sending a death threat from one of the machines in the library, which is the only place on campus where you can use a Windows box without logging in on your student account; to the administrators, this is seen as a big liability issue indicating a need for tighter control (rather than as an inevitable result of the anonymous nature of the internet).

  97. When are you going to have .. by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

    Some ditches Microsoft Windows altogether
    for another OS?

    That would be wonderful news :)

    1. Re:When are you going to have .. by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      That was supposed to read:

      Some [State] ditches Microsoft Windows altogether
      for another OS?

      That would be wonderful news :)

      =============

      I used greater-than/smaller-than characters - so the word [State] disappeared ...

      as if it really matters lol

  98. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by legirons · · Score: 1

    Portable firefox - no it won't cure [Jeff Lash's ?] incredible lack of clue, but it will let you run a decent browser without installing anything.

  99. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by jeff.m.hopkins · · Score: 1

    I go to Berklee College of Music, and all the computers here are macs. We have almost no internet connection problems from the numerous student/lab computers, but we do have quite a bit of problems witht the actuall network infrastructure. There is no MSIE that is running by default on any of the computers (not even the students, because we are all required to get a mac...). We just went through a major update on all of our earlier computers that ran OS9 and installed firefox and the like.

  100. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a serious security flaw (http://www.winamp.com/player/version_history.php) in Winamp until version 5.05 which allowed execution of any code even if Winamp was not being used. Maybe somebody exploited this. And maybe you should not pretend to know better and install programs on public computers.

  101. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Installing software on the school's machines, regardless of your good intentions, showed really bad judgment.

    You also have to realize that although you consider yourself to be more knowledgeable than this admin, there are lots and lots of users who are way, way lower on the scale. At my school, the network admins are currently squabbling with the faculty over an attempt to keep faculty from attaching their own dekstop machines to the campus network. Well, I really don't think the FreeBSD box on my desk is a likely source of infection, but the plain truth is that there are a lot of lusers who just don't have the faintest clue about how to keep their Windows box secure.

  102. As Penn State Faculty.... by bill11082 · · Score: 1

    I of course get the faculty newsletter. The interesting part is below. Looks like this is all because of CERT(www.cert.org). I love how firefox and mozilla are listed separately.

    "4. CHANGE IN INTERNET BROWSERS RECOMMENDED

    Over the past several months, considerable
    attention has been paid to the security problems
    surrounding Microsoft's Internet Explorer by the
    general news media and information technology
    departments in higher education. The Computer
    Emergency and Response Team, Carnegie Mellon
    University's federally funded research group
    formed to deal with security issues on the
    Internet, has issued numerous vulnerability
    alerts and recommends that users switch to a
    different Web browser. As a result, Penn State's
    Information Technology Services (ITS) is urging
    that the University computing community use
    standards-based Web browsers other than Internet
    Explorer to help minimize exposure to attacks
    that occur through browser vulnerabilities. ITS
    has made this recommendation because the threats
    are real and alternatives exist to mitigate Web
    browser vulnerabilities. Browser options include
    Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape Communicator, Opera
    and Safari."

    --
    DANGER! 10,000 Ohms
  103. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by unclethursday · · Score: 1
    Certain plugins had a hard time working before they made an installer for Firefox. Java, Flash, WMP, Quicktime, etc. might not work correctly unless they made an installer.

    I still have Firefox 0.7 (I think that's the version, either 0.7 or 0.8, Windows version) on CD in case I go someplace that doesn't have Firefox installed, so at least I'm not forced into using IE. I can run it off the CD, and I have no problems and nothing to install.

  104. I love IE by tin+foil+hat+dude · · Score: 1

    I use IE 5.1 on Mac......Of course all my machines run OS9.1.

    I am a strict adherent to the idea of chronological compatibility. I have 4 machines that run scanners and printers that cost many times what the computers cost. I purchased everything at the same time and have done one minor OS upgrade from 8.6 to 9.1. Since 1998 I have had no major problems and keep the machines runing nearly constantly. I have never had a virus, nor any type of problem from the internet on the machine that is connected to the internet.

    I regularly find the problems of others humorous, as I see anyone who has problems with their computers to be of the same ilk that would lick a welding tip to see if it was working. Most of the people who are commenting here seem to beg these issues on themselves by constantly changing and "tweaking" things. perhaps some of them someday will learn the joys of leaving well enough alone.

    --
    Reality is all that stuff that doesn't care if you believe in it or not.--Solomon Short
  105. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, I attended there for a bit of time. It's a great school and has a very beautiful campus too.

  106. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just put portable firefox on a flash.Then you don't install anything and still have firefox.The link is-http://portablefirefox.mozdev.org/.A LOT easier than dealing with ie.

  107. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    You are dealing with a Windows admin. For many of them, the common reason for everything is that the problem is someone else's fault....

    In my experience, windows admins and people that use windows a lot, are just supersticious people. Why? Because the operating system they use makes no sense. To watch a "windows guru" use thier computer by clicking things like "OK" "Apply" over and over again just "to make sure", and the extra "clicking around" almost makes me dizzy. The OS eats mouse events, it behaves differently when program X is running, it is most often loaded with spyware and adware, how is anyone able to get some sort of baseline except for reinstalling all the time (with the computer disconnected from the network).

  108. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First of all, there's at least two different ways to measure megabits, which might account for the discrepency. Second, the line might not exactly be 10, it just might have some packet shaper on one end to throttle traffic, your friend might have maxed it out. Third, your friend is a dick for doing this, there are actually people there to learn and not trade files.

  109. He'll get what he deserves. by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    Alright, I just went there too...

    meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0"

    Strike one.

    visible interpolation of images on the main page (it looks like some fool blew things up WAY beyond native resolution).

    Strike two.

    Link on front page to the thing about 'regula' (upper right-hand corner) is a dead link.

    Three strikes.

    Methinks this admin will get what's coming to him in his own good time. Some kiddie will stumble on this site someday and have a ball. People who can't make sure they have working links on their front pages, and let users install whatever they want in labs generally don't know much about security.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  110. Probably the wrong approach by MasterVidBoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a linux and firefox user, this is probably the wrong approach. Students should not be told that they must or must not use any particular piece of software as long as that software doesn't damage the network (I don't think IE causes nearly as many problems as p2p on college campuses).

    My school has a slightly different way of dealing with this (at least for dorm computers): If your machine appears to be infected, they cut your internet access. Then, they'll fix your computer and give you a talk about security, but only once.

    If you get infected again, you lose internet access, and don't get it back until you demonstrate that your machine has been reformatted. Every time. All of a sudden, even the most non-techie people start to be a little more careful, and start listening to you.

  111. more people using mozilla by stormi · · Score: 0

    i convinced my HS to try mozilla in at least one lab out of 3.... hopefully they'll realize it's better and switch them all to it. the kids are over their initial shock and u know.. terror.... but i showed about half of the school how to use mozilla (yes, they're all that technophobic) and i think we're on the right track. even some average people are convinced mozilla is better now. =) i hearing about this info spreading in so many places now.

    --
    "if only i had known i would have been a locksmith." -albert einstein
  112. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    UNC-Charlotte's engineering labs are done like this as well. Maybe not Deep Freeze itself but another thing much similar. if you want to keep anything you save it to your AFS share

    Getting firefox to work like this took some tweaking but as it stands the only reason i fire up IE is to browse the Godawful student portal that UNCC uses

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  113. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm...

    So, despite the fact - which you readily admit to - that Windows is so fucked up it can not maintain system integrity beyond the scope of a single user's session, you recommend it for use in environments with "requirements like these"?

    To my knowledge, there exists no environment, the requirements of which can be satisfied of a system this fundamentally flawed.

    Does it fall a part just beyond the scope of a single user's session, or does it also start going to shit if the user's session becomes longer than an hour or so?

    What admin otherwise of sound mind wouldn't flip out, assault rifle style, if he or she had to manage a network of machines running that OS?

    Seriously. Why reward them by paying them money for something which is so obviously utter crap?

  114. Re:i got a friend there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0.1 not 1.0

    if you looked at the page you linked you might have actually seen this...

  115. Devil's advocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Windows user. I got my PC 2 years ago and while it's been really useful, it seems like half the times I visit some website or install a program, I get a virus and my system gets screwed up. Once, I even downloaded this program that promised it'll stop all viruses and it screwed up my system. My friend isntalled a firewall and now she gets more popups than ever before... Now you're telling me to install yet another program that'll stop all viruses. Why should I believe you that this firefox isn't yet another one of those programs that'll screw up my system again? Hmmm?

    1. Re:Devil's advocate... by EllynGeek · · Score: 1

      OMG you have uncovered the sekkrit conspiracy. Now you must "disappear."

      --

      we will end no whine before its time

  116. UC Davis by spamania · · Score: 1

    I am a student at UC Davis in Davis, CA, as well as a web-developer for the accounting department there.

    UCD has advocated Mozilla for years, including Mozilla browser and more recently Firefox as part of the suite of applications they recomend to incoming freshmen.

    Consequently, use of the various flavors of Mozilla as a percentage of overall browser use is significantly higher for the web applications I develop, which are utilized primarily by staff and students of the university. In general, analysis of our servers' logs show Internet Explorer declining in popularity and Firefox growing in popularily steadily, ever since Mozilla's inception.

    We are a very *nix/open source-centric school overall. The CS department (of which I am a part) acts as though Redmond, WA is best known for the timber production, and although I use a W2K machine at work, we are a jEdit/ColdFusion/Oracle/CSS-standards-compliant shop that does more to ensure total browser compatibility than a good many major internet presences I can think of.

    That's all. Just wanted to toot my school's horn a bit.


    --
    My other .sig is a troll.
  117. Re:He's not all that smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " IT IS = IT'S; IT possessive = IT'S." LOL

  118. Now to HTML free of IE centric code on internet by sjs132 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mozilla is nice, I use it now... (love the tabbed browsing, etc..)

    BUT...

    I still run into problems with pages that just don't work... So Then I have to go copy/paste URL, Fire up IE, and eventually kill it when I'm done playing...

    The INTERNET still needs to realize that IE is NOT the only browser to program for...

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  119. We Have Mad Microsoft Money At My School by oobob · · Score: 1

    I go to a big ten school that has a massive campus wide agreement with Microsoft that gives us Windows XP and all other major Microsoft apps (office, frontpage) for 8 dollars each, except for Visual Studio.net, which costs 11. You can also download office XP from ITS (norton too, thank god). Don't get me wrong, they have more than just MS stuff - Mac OS X costs 14 or so, and Red Hat Enterprise costs around 10. I already filled up a binder of hundreds of dollars of software (I buy every version released) after 2 and a half years here. This agreement is campus wide - the CS department uses mainly linux labs, although it does have some connection with Microsoft.

    Last semester, they started to teach intro computing classes in C#, and I'll bet they get some money for that. Oddly enough, I'm glad, as the course introduced me to Visual Studio, the crack of GUI windows programming (the labs used citrix to run it). They've successfully hooked myself and another of my friends to it. They're smarter than people realize, and go to great lengths to ensure that graduates in as many fields as possible rely on their software (Excel is almost universally used at my school). They also seem to understand that getting programmers using their tools is essential for them to keep their market dominance.

  120. Readable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  121. "Compare prices on Worms" in Related Links above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm MMM. Yummy!

  122. Re:i got a friend there by Pyroja · · Score: 1

    0.1 or 1.0... Isn't it all still Firefox?

    --
    [Trojan.]
  123. I actually took it to the boardroom by skids · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The CIO called a meeting on security, brought in all the CIO's and CS managers from the University branchess for the state, and among other things, we talked about what to do about the slew of problems with student machines.

    I pointed out that students get zero education on computer security, and that if they really wanted to fix the problem, they would create a 1 credit required gen-ed course on personal computer security. Students would thus be required to learn how to keep junk off their desktops one hour a week for a semester (plus it would be an excuse to give remedial computer usage insruction to some of the freshmen that come from living-under-a-rock high school.)

    That idea raised some eyebrows. They said "now, THAT's thinking out of the box." They diligently noted it in their notepads and pointless PDA gizmos.

    And then, did absolutely nothing.

    But that's about what I was expecting, that just because they had the wherewithal to recognize a good idea when they heard it, didn't mean they would remember it for more than a week. That's not how it works. If it doesn't reach crisis proportions, these types of people don't do crap about it.

    1. Re:I actually took it to the boardroom by dq5+studios · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait, making students take a class to teach them something at a university is thinking outside the box? jeez, and I thought the college I went to was bad.

    2. Re:I actually took it to the boardroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it doesn't reach crisis proportions, these types of people don't do crap about it.


      That is exactly why I choose to litter profusely.
      __
      -Rob

    3. Re:I actually took it to the boardroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then perhaps you should follow up to try and get this great idea implemented.

      Find out who else would need to be convinced that this is a good idea. Come up with a course outline, necessary resources and estimated costs and benefits.

      Anything but whining 'they didn't listen to me' on Slashdot.

      Because that certainly won't make computer security on your campus any better.

  124. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Foolhardy · · Score: 1

    When did I say anything about the OS being broken? It's an easy way to give the user full control over the computer as long as they are sitting in front of it, after which it returns to its standard state.

    It's not the only way: giving users non-admin access to the machines is another. Unfortunately, non-admin doesn't let anyone install new programs or run certain badly designed ones correctly. This method gives them root without comprimising the machine for other users.

    Either way, as an admin you want to have some protection against gross user incompetence. Windows is perfectly usable and stable if you know what you are doing. There is no time limit and there is no reason that it will just fall apart. Unfortunately, it is somewhat easy for a user to break or infect the machine through igorance, given admin access. Like I said, this probably isn't a good idea for a personal computer but it does work well for a community one.

    Note that there is a version of Deep Freeze for Mac OSX also; does this mean that OSX is also "fundamentally flawed"?

  125. I love IE by intranetsupport · · Score: 0

    I'm using it right now. No spy/ad/mal ware here. :shrugs:

  126. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Saeger · · Score: 1

    I thought you were joking... but you're not. A 'college' propagating the asinine fear mongering politics of the US govt? That's just depressing.

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  127. What school? by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 1

    Which school do you attend and could they possible convince other universities to take this approach? Genius. People won't change unless it's economically in their interest to do so. This makes it that way.

  128. It's prolly the time to negotiate new contracts... by melted · · Score: 1

    Back in the day, folks would drink coffee from Amdahl mugs whenever IBM salespeople came in. This is the same thing I think. They "ditch" IE, Ballmer comes with sweat running down his back and strikes a deal with the school, and maybe makes a million dollar donation. Everyone's happy, everyone's using IE again.

    Seriously, though, how are they going to enforce this?

  129. Some don't agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ITS office in my department posted the following: "... Please disregard this message at this time. The Office of IT does not agree with the recommendation at this time but will provide you with more information in the very near future."

  130. But this is what I want to know? by sarareku · · Score: 1

    Can you manage group policies with Firefox? I think it's impossible to do group policies, system wide updates, and user restrictions on a server level with firefox, unless there's a new application or tool to do it.

    Penn is just making up for a useless group of admins who don't know how to take care of their machines.

    That, or are too lazy to do some real work.

    1. Re:But this is what I want to know? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, becasue Microsoft invented ^H^H^H^H^H^H innovated being able to set policy, and user control.
      Moron.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  131. Put their money where their mouth is! by dremspider · · Score: 1

    I am currently enrolled at PSU, and they should probably switch to firefox on the public computers that the University provides before they start telling its students to. When I first attended the university they had both IE 6 and Netscape 4 installed. I used netscape 4 which was heck, but it wasn't IE heck. This semester I was surprised to see that they got rid of it in all the computers. So when are they going to install another browser?

  132. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    Well, not sure about the more recent versions of winamp, but many with the "winamp browser" uses ie as an embedded control, and many of the "webcasters" in there were abusing this with the video streams...

    beyond this, look at portable firefox .. you can have a non-installed copy on a keychain device.. :)

    as for winamp, kinda on your own there.. an mp3 player is probably your solution.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  133. They are still inept by with_him · · Score: 1

    I am a Ph.D. candidtate and they are still inept. But some stroke of Genius they figured that if people had less problems they wouldn't get as many calls. After this was achieved. A student probably said something like ... well I was having problems all the time and calling you like 3 times a weeks to fix my computer. But after one of my IM buddies told me to download Firefox I haven't had any problems.

  134. response will be Not renewing our site license by with_him · · Score: 1

    I am a Grad Student at Penn State Univerity Park (Main Campus) and we get pretty good deals on microsoft products. As an example xp pro for $35 and Office 2003 Pro for about the same. I was to take a crack at the fall out, it will be that my cheap and legal software source is about to wither and die. I am all for legal software but at 300+ bucks a pop my budget couldn't afford that. Since in started at PSU I have forked over the bones like a good consumer and gone legal for all software on my rig. Why becuase it was at a pricepoint where I could afford! If that changes than sadly so may the legality of my machine :(

  135. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Foolhardy · · Score: 1
    I use Windows a lot and I admin several computers running it. The operating system makes plenty of sense to me; could you be more specific about what is confusing you?
    I don't make configuration changes more than once because I didn't expect the first few to take effect, or any of the other silly behavior you described. Windows is as detriministic as the next OS.
    The OS eats mouse events
    What is this effect you are describing? Mouse events go thru the Win32 subsystem and are posted to the message queue in the thread that owns the window under the cursor. How and when the events are handled depends on the application's thread.
    [Windows] behaves differently when program X is running
    Each process lives in its own address space. There are ways for them to communicate with each other, but interfere with each other (let alone the OS)? By what method are they doing that? Name some examples of this happening.
    it is most often loaded with spyware and adware
    I do not have and have never had any viruses, spyware, adware or other malware installed on my systems. It's not that hard to avoid. Running as a non-admin user prevents system infection and most forms of user infection. You wouldn't do everything as root on UNIX, would you?
    how is anyone able to get some sort of baseline except for reinstalling all the time (with the computer disconnected from the network).
    I have never reinstalled an operating system because it was broken, Windows included. I don't disconnect my computers from the network, either.

    What you describe of users who treat the computer as a mystical black box and have infection problems they have can't fix or even know about is caused by ignorance and incompetence, not a specific OS. What makes you think it would be any different on a different OS?
  136. bad assumptions and bad ideas. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Ghost image of the student machines so if they became screwed up it was a quick automated task to fix the problem.

    You don't know that they did not do that. All you know is that the administrator tried to tell the student that winamp and firefox broke the computer and the administrator reinstalled the machine. We don't know how the reinstall was done or if the administrator really thought that's what broke his computers. I'd use Knoppix and partimage. The administrator might have just been trying to scare the student, which is almost as dumb as believing what he said.

    "Just opening Internet Explorer results in about 3 minutes of closing popups" So why were you putting your head in the sand by installing two pieces of software that had nothing to do with the problem? ... You using FireFox and Winamp aren't doing anything to help. ... you should have downloaded AdAware and cleaned up the system ...

    Now there's a really bad idea. Firefox, I'm sure, spared him one day's worth of pop up garbage. Adaware and Spybot Search and Destroy are best of breed but dangerous to apply. Many viruses, worms and malware contain suicide pills. When you try to eliminate them, they take you out. Indeed, one of them might have detected firefox and killed the system over it. On a machine that screwed up, Adaware is almost sure to kill it. Reimaging was the right thing to do. The whole thing is a windoze cluster fuck and the poor guy is just going to have to put up with it until the administrator figures things out on his own.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  137. Insightful? Is it that annoying? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    Come on now. I like firefox too, but I don't get all stressed out if I run across a site that requires me to launch IE. It's a rare occassion and when it happens it just makes me remember how bad things used to be.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  138. i wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    that my college would do the same, that way people would stop knocking on my door asking to fix their computer.

  139. What a bunch of bullshit. by twitter · · Score: 1
    where I used to work only uses IE on their systems. They also used Windows 98 .... During the hay day of blaster and myDoom and whatnot guess which department was the least affected by it all?

    I'd have guessed any department using Macs, Linux, Solaris or some other form of Unix. Microsoft themselves declared Winblows 98 obsolete. I've seen hundreds of dead 98 and 95 computers. XP does not do much better.

    A better solution would be to educate the students on where to get the free VirusScan software from the university and how to keep it up to date along with their Windows system.

    You think people who can't install a simple browser are going to be able to find and use all the special crap it takes to keep Winblows alive on the web for more than four minutes? Right.

    People keep telling me the sky is falling and I've yet to see it actually happen to my systems.

    You get spam, right? 90% of that spam comes from Winblows infected computers. The same automatically installing malware is used for porn serving and porn dialing and credit card fraud.

    If your system has not had to be reinstalled in the last year or two it's strictly because your IT department has shielded you. They can be providing firewalls, system updates and virus scanning of your email. Without those, your XP box is a sitting duck with a 4 minute half life.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:What a bunch of bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical sycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or Mepis or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. This is an article about email disclaimers. The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx, because "is teh free".

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      Here's that drive-by advocacy and FUD in motion: twitter goes on about some topic and then drops the usual "oh and M$ is teh evil" because "WMP phones home" or some such. Called on his FUD, he then claims that WMP stores every song and movie you've ever played in a file, somewhere. Pressed further, he just sort of slithers out of sight, his FUD-spreading complete. This is not about some Microsoft technology that nobody likes anyway; it's about lying for the sake of lying. Way too many of his posts are exactly like this one.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one. Or this one.

      Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

      M

  140. You are kidding me! by twitter · · Score: 1
    create a 1 credit required gen-ed course on personal computer security. Students would thus be required to learn how to keep junk off their desktops one hour a week for a semester

    That would be an incredible waste of time. A full undergraduate load is four courses, typically twelve credit hours. What you propose is close to ten percent of the student load and eight full credit hours over a student's career. If you added one or two computer science courses to that, you could have a minor. All of that to "support" Bill Gate's broken software? No thanks.

    Most Universities have a one or two hour long course for students. There they can learn the wonders of anti-virus, pass phrases and a few other useless things that most people already know. That people still have problems with Winblows is not an indication of general ignorance so much as it's an indication that the thing they are using has problems. The Mac, Linux and Unix labs don't have problems, though the same people use them.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:You are kidding me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And money. Some universities count the credits more than full load and charge the students extra for it. One credit can be about $300 for non-resident tuition and about a third of that for resident tuition. The GP is a typical Wintel users' response. Instead of avoiding the problem by choosing a much more secure platform, they recommend Wintel and make people spend time and money to support it. And then they claim the TCO is cheaper when they actually mean the initial cost is cheaper.

    2. Re:You are kidding me! by skids · · Score: 1


      For *one* semester. 1 credit hour.

    3. Re:You are kidding me! by ekmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      At Carnegie Mellon, considered to be one of the best tech schools in the world, all students (even CS and ECE majors) are required to take Computing Skills Workshop. The very first lesson in the course is on security and passwords. It also covers UNIX commands, file management, and access rights.

      After a few weeks, most people realize that they can skip the classes and only show up for exams, so it's not really a waste of time for those who do not need it. However, for those who do, it ensures that they have a baseline level of computing knowledge, which helps keep our network safer.

      --

      | Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
    4. Re:You are kidding me! by torenth · · Score: 1
      For *one* semester. 1 credit hour.

      Haha, thanks for saying this. After I read the other guy say "8 credit hours" I attempted to figure out exactly how he came to that conclusion. But now, in response to him: seriously, I typically take seven classes per semester. An extra credit isn't really that big of a deal.

      --
      'Phone-jacking: Give someone a ring, they'll have to answer to find out who it is!' - Threni
    5. Re:You are kidding me! by recursiv · · Score: 1

      1% by my calculation. I was required to earn 120 credits to graduate. I think this is pretty standard.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    6. Re:You are kidding me! by jd142 · · Score: 1

      A full undergraduate load is 12 hours? No wonder you kids today take 6 years to graduate. A full load just 10 years ago was 15-18 credit hours, 5-6 classes a semester. 12 hours is the bare minimum to be a full time student. A really full load was taking 7 classes a semester for 21 credits. But I only did that once or twice. If you wanted to take more you had to get special permission and it wasn't worth the hassle.

    7. Re:You are kidding me! by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

      Right on... here where I go 15 credits is the lowest most people get,18 is the average load, and 21-27 is the high end of the range. Of course special permission is needed to go over 23. I've taken 20 for three semesters in a row. We also have a lot of 0 hour required classess. On top of that a computer competency exam (really really easy) must be passed for you to graduate. With regards to IE and FireFox... our school has nominaly switched to firefox but most students have no idea why they had to install firefox to register for the internet. Nor do they have an idea what it actually is. Every student computer in the school has at least 0.8 though. However our network is so screwy I think we loose 10%-20% traffic through packet loss. (Is that possible?) In short: 1 credit hour is nothing, firefox is great, and most people don't understand exactly what it is even if it is on their computer; underscoring their ignorance about what is on there. I have some horror stories from working in the student ITS department.

  141. Is it really news? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I was in school, I remember using Netscape 3 to view webpages (after all, we were using Unix).

    I'd rather say that universities are going back to their roots. IE was designed for home computers and the Joe User, not for universities.

    1. Re:Is it really news? by Feynman · · Score: 1


      I remember using Mosaic when I was in school!
      </old man voice>

  142. make a special update. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Others...?

    They will find a way to make noting at Penn State work with Firefox. My bet is they slip something into the updates for them that starts spitting out error messages like Win3.1 did with DrDOS. They did not quit making IE for Apple because they were paranoid or no longer wanted the money, they did it because they projected their own behavior onto Apple.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  143. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

    But before he could do that the head of IT called him in for using too much bandwidth. My friend was a little worried because our college had pretty strict bandwidth policies and he stood to lose his account permanently. But when he went in, the first thing this guy (who makes >$150k) says is "Son, do you know you're using 13 megabits of bandwidth?" On a 10 megabit connection. Right. My friend stopped worrying after that.

    If your 'friend' was paying attention in class instead of trading warez he might have learned that a 10megabit connection provides 10mb in each direction on a full duplex connection. You could be using 8mb in one direction and 5mb in the other. If your 'friend' paid attention in math he might realize that 8+5==13.

  144. Forced alternative v. real alternative by _RidG_ · · Score: 1

    Over here at UC Berkeley, there is a different policy. At the beginning of every semester, new students receive a free "BeSecure" CD, which basically includes Windows XP SP2, all critical patches, Symantec Norton Antivirus and Firewall, and Mozilla Firefox. (The CD does include Mac stuff, though I am not sure what it includes, as I don't use a Mac).

    The catch is that you have to install the CD in order to use the in-room broadband connection. You are not, however, required to use Firefox, though it is suggested - you can use IE, which, honestly, is pretty secure after all the patches + Norton Firewall have been installed.

    In talking to the people on my floor, however, I've found that despite not being forced to use IE, most people did switch over to Firefox eventually. Simply put, it's just a better program, and after demonstrating all the plugins etc. to the people on my floor, I was able to get them to realize this ;D

    --


    "The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it." - G.B. Shaw
  145. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by slaad · · Score: 1

    How is it they let people become the network administrator for an entire technical college, a college that hands out degrees in technical fields, that are just that ignorant. How can any competent network admin possibly think Firefox and Winamp are causing a computer to not boot?

    Maybe he was just assuming that you were dumb and he was trying to scare you into not installing anything. There're a lot of good reasons for restricting users from installing software, but the easiest way to explain to someone who doesn't know any better is to just say that it trashes the whole computer.

    --


    ~Warning!~ The above is encrypted using rot676!
  146. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Autobahn · · Score: 1

    Since you care so much about the details of my random story,

    1. Connections were 10 half, not full duplex.
    2. They don't care about your downstream, since lots of people use the full downstream legitimately.
    3. If I were talking about myself, I'd say so.

  147. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Goosey · · Score: 1

    Thanks a lot. Definently will try using this, as soon as I get a USB drive or equivilant. I am assuming it requires write access (ruling out a 'firefox cd' to carry around)?

    --
    --- "End Of Line" - MCP
  148. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Spoing · · Score: 1
    I take it that they were just computers in a lab shared by whoever sits down and logs in. (If not, the following may not apply.)

    With that,

    1. I doubt that FF broke the systems, though Winamp might have...depending on the version and what it was bundled with.
    2. Software from unknown sources can be tainted with malware or a virus. He'd be responsible to clean it up if you made a mistake...meaning;
    3. You were wrong to install anything without asking first and I would have yanked your account also.
    4. He was wrong for not securing his systems so that it was possible for you to do things he strictly forbids.
    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  149. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Spoing · · Score: 1
    1. To watch a "windows guru" use thier computer by clicking things like "OK" "Apply" over and over again just "to make sure", and the extra "clicking around" almost makes me dizzy.

    I've seen that too. Confuses me when I watch it. I think it comes from the 'to fix a problem, uninstall and reinstall' method of 'correcting' a problem that most Windows folks get into. With *nix, it's not going to magically change from failing to working just by reinstalling it.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  150. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Spoing · · Score: 1

    WOW! You ain't kidding...what ape cobbled that horrid mess together? BAH!

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  151. You're right, it is a no brainer. by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    They'll keep applying more of said tactics, until Penn State publically withdraws this policy.

    I don't know why I didn't think of that. It seems so obvious, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if that's how they'll actually respond. Of course, the only people who will hear about it or care about it will be folks like the Slashdot crowd (and the unfortunates at Penn State's IT department).

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  152. It's just security through obfuscation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is just security through obfuscation. Those browsers are not unequestionably "more secure" they are just "less targeted".

  153. PSU Security by ronniej · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am currently a student at Penn State Altoona that oversees a team of students that fix computers on campus. Myself and another avid read of slashdot having been pushing the movement to get rid of IE long before ITS officialy declared it a threat. All the students I have given FireFox to have thank me graciously and love not having ridiculously amounts of popups.

    Penn State takes the network very seriously and has as implemented many network policys. They have search and deactivate probes on the network to determine if a host is infected and secondly they lock the terminals in the dorms to specific MAC addresses. The team is constantly reactivating virus-cleaned computers. The network security could be compared that of government security.

    Anti-InternetExplorer is the primary spyware and virus solution.

    1. Re:PSU Security by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      I had the same thing to deal with at The Pointe in State College. I wasn't even a student, but I was living there cuz I worked in the area. IF you had ANY servers running (FTP, HTTP, etc.), you would be quarantined and have to shut it down and fax them something saying you had killed the server. They would then check, and reactivate you after usually 48 hours. And switching your MAC didn't work either, unfortunately. Never had to deal with the net going at 20kb/sec either, but man was that a hassle.

  154. But if they do that... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Funny
    CS students won't be able to earn extra money cleaning their dorm-mates' computers! And then how will they purchase b33r?!?

    Oh what a bleak, sober, secure future it will be!

  155. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is still "installing" software on your school's computer. A second violation after you've been warned. I'd proceed cautiously.

  156. IE for the Mac not the same at all by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    IE for the Mac is not at all the same. Even though the version says 5.5 it's very, very different from IE 5.5 on Windows.

    About the only thing IE on the mac got right was really good CSS support (much better than Windows IE, or so I've read). Other than that it lacks many features and has far more compatibility problems than either Safari or Mozilla.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  157. Re:This isn't really hurting Microsoft - Wrong! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    With IE bundled with the OS, IE dominance, and so therefore MS's own web standards are not ever going to be threatened by people obtaining and using other browsers now.

    Wrong. MS is in trouble if FireFox becomes capable of running all the other software you need (i.e. Java apps, HTML rendering, XML, e-mail, usenet, plug-ins). Then all you need is any CPU and any OS that runs FireFox. Heck, FireFox could evolve into a true standalone brower, meaning bye bye Windows. That's Microsoft's real concern.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  158. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by bleakcabal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where I work this is how the network admin fixes problems on his windows boxes. 1.Reboot. 2.Reboot again. 3.Wait. 4.Reboot again. 5.Fiddle around some windows clicking on various things. 6.Wait. 7.Reboot. Ask him what's the problem is : "I don't know." Anyway after X amount of time it's fixed no one knows how it was fixed, what it was or to prevent it again...

  159. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Here's an assertive idea. Find out who is boss is (without telling him of course). Present a well documented current security analysis of the school, just from what you can observe. Point out all the flaws, and how the security this prick admin is putting the school at risk of losing SERIOUS money (this is where you point out the financial effects of all the crap IE is open to). Also, feel free to mention that as a student, you know what can make your fellow students happier (and enjoy school more). Conduct a survey and get a quantitative and qualitative report of what the students think about the annoyance of spyware on school computers, and the slow speed of the browsers. Explain that firefox can even be made to look like IE (skins) to help people make the conversion.

    Here's the kicker. If you're really ballsy, and want to take a stab at being an entrepeneur, offer to do a security consulting job for the school at whatever rate you can negotiate.

    -You get paid by the school.
    -The browser issue gets solved.
    -You get to evaluate the prick admin and get to determine how much he gets bitched out by how badly you write him up (be professional though).
    -And if you're really lucky, you may wind up with his job is you want it.

    Oh, and just so all you Slashdotters know, I'm a marketing person. This proves once and for all that we can indeed be ethical, generous, intelligent, and beneficial. Ya dig?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  160. Re:With IE (not just in Soviet Union), by EugeneK · · Score: 0

    At Soviet Penn State, only old people use MSIE!

  161. If only in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could we have universities clueful enough to do this.

  162. So Remove Internet Explorer by The+Fifth+Man · · Score: 1

    Remove IE from Win2k

    Remove IE from nLite

    Oh, be sure to reply how:
    1. Windows Update won't work! Even though I take great pains to point out the solution, I've never heard THAT one before!
    2. It's really impossible to remove IE! Even though I document how to do it, I've never heard THAT one before!
    3. It will make your machine unstable! I've been running IE free for 4 years and I've never heard THAT one before!

  163. credit card numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to spam this, but Firefox has a horrible flaw. It stores credit card numbers in autocomplete.

    If i borrow your single-user computer (as most windows computers are) i just have to type the first digit of your credit card number.

    It's easy enough to avoid. Just don't remember "cc"/"ccard" input boxes, or any number that resembles a credit card. Simple.

    But... Bug 188285. WONTFIX!

  164. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by yo5oy · · Score: 1
    Run the software from a usb key. There are binaries of firefox that do this along with email apps, etc.

    http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/portable_firefox/

    As far as the school is concerned, change schools.

    What I think is an amusing anecdote related to ignorant network administrators.

    I worked at a university and at a community college as a tech and a sysadmin respectively. People like who you encountered are everywhere. My boss spent tons of money on outside contractors so they could be blamed if things went wrong and, well, because he didn't know sh*t. I remember looking at invoices for services rendered before I was hired. There was one $300 USD invoice was for deleting users from Novell. WTF?

    --
    a slut did tulsa
  165. What they really ment by phunqe · · Score: 1

    When they said 'because the threats are real and alternatives exist to mitigate Web browser vulnerabilities.' they really ment 'please change browser, so that we can continue slacking on the job'.

    I am tired of hearing this as an excuse. It's bs.
    I've been administrating a company's IT resources since 2000 and what have we had... 0 virus outbreaks (from mail, files brought in etc), 0 trojans and other windows/IE related issues, 0 spyware.

    Now why is this I ask myself... Oh yes, proper anti-virus software, proper firewall software and keeping all the computers up to date at all times.
    All is managed from a central server. I don't even have to visit each computer.

    You'll be amazed how crappy computers are administered these days. I've been to tons of companies where their Windows workstations haven't seen an update since the last ice-age.
    I'm tired of admins who are not doing their job properly. What's the problem?

    Stop blaming vulnerabilities and take a 101 course in computer administration instead.

  166. I use Outlook Express at college by fantomas · · Score: 1

    ... as my email client because my department *prefers* (i.e. insists) that I do. Same as parent poster. I'm a research student, therefore I am the bottom of the power chain. If I don't like it, fine, I can go study somewhere else. So I got to use what I am told, despite my protestations, on the box they give me for my desk.

  167. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by truesaer · · Score: 1

    I install software on lab computers at Cornell all the time. Installs to network drives generally work, though not always. Many other labs I've seen just reghost themselves daily without any special intervention so that users can have full control. If you don't make installs an administrator only priviledge, and don't publicize your policy, that kind of implies that they're permitted. Controlling permissions is one of the most basic administration tasks, so any organization that sets up public use labs IMO should be assumed to have their permission set to allow you to do anything you're allowed to do, and restrict you from doing anything you're not. Also, if you yanked my account for installing Firefox when it was your own administrative screwup that allowed me to I would tell you to go fuck yourself.

  168. Re:It's prolly the time to negotiate new contracts by ctid · · Score: 1
    Seriously, though, how are they going to enforce this?

    At the moment it seems to be just a suggestion. But for the majority of students, they could simply configure the IE icon to load up firefox and they would be none-the-wiser.
    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  169. question by khallow · · Score: 1

    By "corporately-owned" do you mean a corporation owns and manages the college or some more general category like private colleges? I'm a little puzzled because I can't think of colleges off the top of my head that fit the profile you mention except maybe those dubious ones that advertise heavily on TV.

    1. Re:question by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Yes, the dubious ones that advertise heavily on TV and are owned and managed by corporations such as CEC. Of course, I don't watch TV*, so I didn't catch the advertising. I had just heard that it was a fairly prestigious local college that had an excellent program. Later, I realized that I had only heard this from the college and not from any of the students or employers in town.

      * Yes, I know this is rather strange coming from someone who works in television. I'm just as fed up with the reality crap and declining quality of shows as everyone else. That, and when you work behind the scenes, it's awfully hard to watch the show instead of the camerawork and other technical aspects of the production. =D Sports highlight reels are fun to watch just for the amazing camerawork as well as the plays.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    2. Re:question by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      ha, I know what you mean there. I was in Theatre Tech in high school, when I DO watch TV - especially those reality shows - it looks like they handed a contestant a camera and said "Have at it!"

    3. Re:question by sahonen · · Score: 1

      No, it gets a lot worse, trust me. You haven't seen bad camerawork until you've really seen what happens when you hand an inexperienced person a handheld broadcast video camera that doesn't have automatic picture controls, including autofocus.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    4. Re:question by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Our stuff wasn't quite professional level, but we did put productions on the local access channel. I was the poor sucker in charge of trying to teach people how to use manual focus as the lighting arrangements sometimes messed with the autofocus on our Canon XL1 and GL1 cameras.

    5. Re:question by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, manual focus on an XL1... The lens controls just suck on that camera, it doesn't quite keep up with what you're doing. But it's an awesome looking camera, I wish we had them in my high school, we had some very old JVC professional camcorders.

      Anyway, I do sports productions with local public access. I'm the poor sucker in charge of trying to teach volunteers how to do camerawork for sports. =D Of course, I'm usually too busy running around making sure everything works to give them more than "This is your zoom, this is your focus, this is how you talk on the intercom, just try and make it look like TV, okay?"

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    6. Re:question by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's basically my job, too. Someone volunteering to set everything up is relaxing for about ten seconds until I realize I'm going to be trying to get cameras to stay turned on 30 seconds before a show starts.. and you're right about the XL1's lens controls being a bit... lazy. So is the white balance.

  170. I'll tell you exactly how (hint: MCSE) by conJunk · · Score: 1

    How is it they let people become the network administrator for an entire technical college, a college that hands out degrees in technical fields, that are just that ignorant. How can any competent network admin possibly think Firefox and Winamp are causing a computer to not boot?

    because universities have the weight of beurocracy behind their hiring procedures, so the dood who's worked 50 hours a week doing all the IT for a small office for 10 years rates bugger-all, but the former high school geography teacher who decided to pick up an MCSE because his life needed a kick-start after he was laid off in the latest round of budget cuts, is obviously eminantly qualified

    them's the breaks

    so you're forced to using IE for the moment? send a link to this story to the IT head, and to his bosss, and to that dood's boss, and let them know that you're concerned about internet security at your school, but look! there's a free and easy solution that's already been implement by one of america's leading universities!

    and as an aside, i reckon including the fellow's email was a low blow (albeit well deserved)

  171. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by sad_ · · Score: 1
    So now under threat of permanently losing my student account I am forced to use IE.



    help yourself to maintain sanity and put firefox on a usb stick and run it from there, no software installed on the pc, no harm done.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  172. Durham by blue-rabbit · · Score: 1

    I'm at the University of Durham in the UK. All of the Uni computers use mozilla and mozilla mail by default. We get copies of mozilla given out free for our own computers in our rooms at the start of the year.
    http://www.dur.ac.uk/
    Unfortunately, M$ Office is still standard.

  173. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by SorcererX · · Score: 1

    I doubt it is Windows' fault. It is more the fact that; why would any well educated and experienced computer tech want to become an network admin at a school or university? I know I wouldn't.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
  174. Advanced tab is there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's called "about:".

    Advanced should not be easy for anyone to use, it merely needs to expose the advanced items in a way that is consistent so that you don't have to learn several different methods for different changes.

  175. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

    i think it runs of the cd.
    winamp 2 sure didn't have to be installed, i remember keeping it around during windows reinstalls

  176. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by echucker · · Score: 1

    Even more amusing... click on that threat level, and you get brought to twotigersonline.com. Their home page is a store for items useful if someone drops The Big One.

  177. my college student took the lead on browsers... by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    We limped along with IE at home, patching and patching for two years. Then my son came home from his first year at college and all but insisted that we all run Mozilla...and downloaded it for us.

    We never even looked back, have removed the "cracked E" icon from the desk top and the start menu and if it weren't for some brain-dead activeX requirement in my employer's HR-self-help applications I could probably delete the .exe too.
    One result: the load of spy ware that I have to comb out of our machines has dropped to a small fraction of the plague that it used to be.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  178. Re:Perpetual Employment! by Dirk+van+der+Broek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bet you worked a full-time job, walked on the football and basketball teams and played in the band at half time too.

    what does it matter how long one stays in school ?

  179. What my local U is doing by akuma624 · · Score: 1

    What is funny about reading the article linked to by /. and the comments here is that it just made me remember what George Mason is asking of their grad students. They set up these grad students with an email account but they give them instructions to use it at home by only using a version of Netscape - precisely between versions 4 and 7 to exclude http://registrar.gmu.edu/ check it out.

    --
    ... if music be fruit of love, play on ....
  180. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  181. Re:Perpetual Employment! by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

    Hey in some places 20-23 is full load now. We don't take 6 years to graduate and the 5th year student is rare. 127 credit hours required and there are a few other classess that you have to take but get zero hours for. Most students here tend between 16-19 hours and it is almost impossible to take less than 15. I'm only managing 14 hours next semester. Twelve is the bare minimum: you register for that many or you don't register. Its not that hard and it makes me sick to hear people whine about their 15 hour load; especially when I was taking 21-22 hours. I've earned my rest.

  182. Re:He's not all that smart by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

    He's not an english major either. I love it when people do stuff like that.

  183. "Vulnerable" IE still not vulnerable here by gfecyk · · Score: 1

    "I see PCs all the time which have IE up to date as well as have up to date anti-virus software that are *still* plagued with problems. Why? IE vulnerabilities."

    Well, I see PCs under my care daily which DON'T have up to date anti-virus software and not even up-to-date patches on IE, yet they still aren't plagued with problems. For two years straight.

    Why?

    Decent security policies, starting with Limited User access. But that's just IT Staff (me) doing its job properly.

    --
    Use Evolution instead of Outlook? Bewa
    1. Re:"Vulnerable" IE still not vulnerable here by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      I find your omnipotence and infallibility impressive.

      As a systems administrator, I find taking all precautions to be the safest method, when available, as opposed to relying on my own perfection to protect against the vulnerabilities of broken software. Congratulations on keeping your network safe, it shows that you're on the ball. Nonetheless, you are very, very lucky that you've never had a mistake or a security vulnerability beyond the aid of available patches hit any of your systems.

  184. That's a firefox problem by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >In addition the Firefox user settings are stored in Application Data which has a 20 meg quota

    Those quotas exist because roaming profiles are being used. Lots of people have begged the firefox people to shift the cache to local settings where it belongs, but they havent, thus the pushing around of a useless cache through the network.

    Saying "Give me a bigger roaming profile because the software I use isnt written properly" is hardly the answer.

    1. Re:That's a firefox problem by dampjam · · Score: 1

      I happen to agree with the firefox people as to where it should be. Penn State maps many drives when we sign on. What I would like them to do is to package their own firefox (which they already do), but give it a switch to -profile to store in a mapped drive.

      The other option is to do what Penn State already does for IE and purge cache as part of a logout script.

    2. Re:That's a firefox problem by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about the profile, but the cache.

      In Windows networks running roaming profiles (not just penn state) the entire profile gets pushed. Except stuff in Local Settings, where IE keeps its cache too.

      The firefox people are dead wrong and I have seen admins put a stop to FF usage because of this issue on domains with roaming profiles. On Windows, the Local Settings folder exists for a reason. Use it.

  185. Bah. by Soeru · · Score: 1

    About time these kids were educated on web browsers. Firefox all the way.

  186. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine, here at the Zürich University of Applied Sciences http://www.zhwin.ch/ the Academic Staff of the IT-Dept. suggested years ago adding Mozilla to the University maintained Computers. Niet :(

    The IT-Services https://its.zhwin.ch/ follow a strictly Microsoft-only policy and the teaching staff, some teaching IT, have to bow.

    Some have discovered that installing FireFox is so somple that they can have it in their user file share! So far the ITS haven't rebuked.

    Just wait, the tide will change!

  187. Please learn how to make links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please learn how to make links.
    <a href="http://www.trollart.com/trollart_toplinks/no lunch.html">another one</a>
    (without any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields: another one

    If that's too much typing for you,
    <URL:http://www.trollart.com/trollart_toplinks/nol unch.html>
    (without any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields: http://www.trollart.com/trollart_toplinks/nolunch. html

    Oh, and for you "Well just right-click on the text and click 'Follow Link'." people, tell me how to open the link in a new tab using Mozilla or shut up.
  188. that's why this is good news. by twitter · · Score: 1
    ... my department *prefers* (i.e. insists) that I [use Outlook].

    Won't it be nice when IT departments rate that piece of junk where it belongs. My University uses web mail, which works well enough though it forces me to use Mozilla rather than Konqueror. It takes time, but it looks like people are getting brave enough to suggest that Microsoft might not have all the answers to desktop computing and that their answers are really a problem.

    I have an old laptop loaded with Debian Sarge. It's only a 233 MHz PII, but it's relatively secure and I can use it to ssh back to my cable box. You can get one for about $300 on ebay. The department is happy that I have a few tools they can't provide me.

    If I were you, I'd use the Outlook just as they want and for nothing but school correspondence. It might last a little longer that way. Good luck.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  189. Compensation for putting up with Stark admin by MegaThawt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes but ... there are some compensating features at Stark State campus ... when I went to their website I checked the Campus Building Map and noted the cool Fire Science training tower (Fire Science apparently gets two dedicated parking lots) and a nifty Diebold Incorporated Advanced Technology Center.

    I want to find out how to incinerate paper backup copies of electronic voting.

    --
    All sigs should be as funny as possible, but no funnier.
  190. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a "real" network/systems admin at a software company. I take care of a healthy mix of linux/bsd/solaris servers and windows/mac workstations.

    I think what he meant by "eats mouse events" is simple. Windows is INCREDIBLY inconsistent. In some apps/config panels you must click "apply" BEFORE clicking "OK" or the changes will not take effect. I've had this happen to me MORE than once. The reason lots of windows admins click apply/OK "just to be sure" is because they too have likely wasted 5 minutes figuring out why a fix doesn't work, only to find that it never actually took effect!

    More to the point; Windows (by default) makes your user account an admin account. True, you WOULDN'T do everything root on *nix, but every single linux distro I've ever installed forces you to create a non-root account on install for just that reason. Not only does Windows NOT do this, but it NEVER extols the demons of running root all the time.

    And you don't disconnect your computers from the network to do a re-install of Windows? You are either:

    1) insane
    2) NAT'ed for all your windows installs

    Ever install XP on a machine that has a publicly routable IP (this is even behind a fairly well configured PIX 515 firewall)? God help you if your subnet is on the radar of a worm or some such; I've had XP machines get owned in the time it took me to refill my coffee if I don't disconnect from the network/install my magic service pack + windows updates CD (that I made for just that purpose; gonna slipstream it into my actual windows install ISO one of these days).

    I'm not saying there aren't a fair share of clueless windows "admins" out there who don't bother to troubleshoot... but there are a good number who do the strange things they do because, from experience, windows responds to these things at times.

  191. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    So he fixed it and didn't do it scientifically. You dont change 30 things, reboot, and see if it solved the problem. You might fix it, but you don't know why. You HAVE to painstakingly try each thing at once to figure out what.

  192. That's not a firefox problem by twitter · · Score: 1
    Those quotas exist because roaming profiles are being used.

    M$'s roaming profiles suck. They move around all sorts of things they don't need to and stuff both local and remote hard drives by default. It's bandwith intensive but does not move all of the settings it should.

    That's not a Firefox problem. I've seen the stupid thing blown up whole networks with nothing but M$ junk running.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:That's not a firefox problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical sycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or Mepis or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. This is an article about email disclaimers. The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx, because "is teh free".

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      Here's that drive-by advocacy and FUD in motion: twitter goes on about some topic and then drops the usual "oh and M$ is teh evil" because "WMP phones home" or some such. Called on his FUD, he then claims that WMP stores every song and movie you've ever played in a file, somewhere. Pressed further, he just sort of slithers out of sight, his FUD-spreading complete. This is not about some Microsoft technology that nobody likes anyway; it's about lying for the sake of lying. Way too many of his posts are exactly like this one.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one. Or this one.

      Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

      M

    2. Re:That's not a firefox problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For someone who doesn't know the difference between two different Windows applications, you should seem to be quite the expert in roaming profiles. Uncanny.

  193. I don't see any trend here, do you? by twitter · · Score: 1
    They "ditch" IE, Ballmer comes with sweat running down his back and strikes a deal with the school, and maybe makes a million dollar donation. Everyone's happy, everyone's using IE again.

    Oh sure, that's what it is, right. It's not like M$'s little browser has not slipped below the 90% mark for the general public. People are looking for a discount on IE, that's it, that's the ticket! No dissatisfaction here, everything is AOK for old Bill Gates. Really, it's all a money game. Any day now all sorts of people using Macs and Linux are going to just give up and go back to software much unchanged from 1995.

    And then, poor Steve Baller woke up.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  194. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Foolhardy · · Score: 1
    I think what he meant by "eats mouse events" is simple. Windows is INCREDIBLY inconsistent. In some apps/config panels you must click "apply" BEFORE clicking "OK" or the changes will not take effect. I've had this happen to me MORE than once. The reason lots of windows admins click apply/OK "just to be sure" is because they too have likely wasted 5 minutes figuring out why a fix doesn't work, only to find that it never actually took effect!
    Operating system config dialogs? Third-party dialogs are irrelevant. I've never encountered this before: give me an example I can verify. Apply means to apply the changes without closing the window, OK means apply and close and cancel means don't apply and close. All of Microsoft's dialogs behave in this manner.
    More to the point; Windows (by default) makes your user account an admin account. True, you WOULDN'T do everything root on *nix, but every single linux distro I've ever installed forces you to create a non-root account on install for just that reason. Not only does Windows NOT do this, but it NEVER extols the demons of running root all the time.
    Yes, this is a problem: for users that are too ignorant to know better, for whom I have little sympathy. Microsoft should be more forthcoming about the risks, but isn't. This hardly represents a problem for a network administrator who presumably has control over the computers in the network. As for a *NIX that makes gives root by default: Lindows-- er Linspire.
    And you don't disconnect your computers from the network to do a re-install of Windows? You are either:
    I do have a NAT, but if I didn't, that's what slipstreaming is for; apply the patches before installation. Copy the patched installation files to the HD or a CD-RW and install from there.
    If you do a lot of installs, I suggest you maintain a patched \i386 directory on a filesever, boot a BartPE CD on install targets and start the install from there. Extra points for making an unattended installation: pop the CD in, and when the process finishes, everything is done.
    It may even be possible to boot into Linux from a CD have it copy the install files and setup program.
    but there are a good number who do the strange things they do because, from experience, windows responds to these things at times.
    Sounds like they give up too easily possibly because it's too much work to understand; a quick fix like restart or reinstall is easier (only in the sort term). Come on, it's software it has to be detirministic on some level.
  195. Well, I use Firefox myself by melted · · Score: 1

    So you don't have to be sarcastic here. But I seriously think this is just another ploy to milk MSFT for money or a good contract. Not for IE, but for W2K3, Office, XP, etc.

    1. Re:Well, I use Firefox myself by twitter · · Score: 1
      I seriously think this is just another ploy to milk MSFT for money or a good contract. Not for IE, but for W2K3, Office, XP, etc.

      I prefer to take what they said at face value because it's true and obvious.

      Your conjecture is interesting but has no factual support and flies in the face of a few. The usual tactic for negotiation is to do a Linux replacement study, and most of those are not done so cynically as you suggest. People have been adopting Linux on the desktop. While IE's use is important to Microsoft as a lock in device, it's not nearly as important revenues for the OS and Office.

      Microsoft has been high handed and their product quality has been poor. Despite a tremendous public relations effort, people know it and are moving to better and lest costly options.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  196. Re:Funny, I got my account disabled for using Fire by Spoing · · Score: 1

    So, you agree with me? :/

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  197. Re:This isn't really hurting Microsoft - Wrong! by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1
    MS is in trouble if FireFox becomes capable of running all the other software you need (i.e. Java apps, HTML rendering, XML, e-mail, usenet, plug-ins). Then all you need is any CPU and any OS that runs FireFox.

    Firefox / Thunderbird is capable of Java apps, HTML rendering, XML, e-mail and usenet. That still doesn't make it a threat to IE in the medium term, because Joe Public is not going to have any OS that runs Firefox, he's going to have Windows.
    If Microsoft had a real concern with this, they'd be doing something to fix IE. In the mean time they don't. As soon as IE is fixed, Joe Public won't bother downloading Firefox, because he already has IE. He bought it with his computer because his computer retailer's (anti-competitive) agreement with microsoft doesn't said retailer to retail a computer without windows on it.
    This is what needs to change before this monopoly is broken and the profit margin (currently 400% for a bug ridden, poor memory managed OS with a ridiculous EULA) on operating systems can be subject to market forces.

  198. Network Nazi Needed by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    I've always thought that having a network connection was akin to driving on the public roadways. They don't let just any 6 year old climb into a 2-ton automobile and start accelerating onto the freeway. Doubly so for commercial drivers of 18-wheelers with gasoline tankers. The more potential damage that can be done, the more the certification that is required.

    IMHO, network access should likewise be restricted to those who prove they are willing to learn something about security and to continue to behave responsibly. Doubly so, the faster the network connection.

    </soapbox>
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  199. Yes! by Ogman · · Score: 1

    Let me shout it from the rooftop....YES!!!! 'bout friggin' time! >

    --
    But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!