Slashdot Mirror


More on Apple/Motorola Joint Cell Phone Venture

1+(smarterThanYou) writes "Forbes.com has an article with updates on the previous Slashdot story on the Motorola/Apple iTunes compatible mobile phone. 'Apple Computer and Motorola could soon show us the mobile phone they are developing to play music purchased from Apple's iTunes online music store. 'We've said we have something coming on this in the first half of 2005 and we're definitely on schedule for that. Hopefully you'll be able to see more about it soon,' says Eddy Cue, vice president in charge of applications at Apple.'" Theories about this device showing up at the next MacWorld Expo abound.

293 comments

  1. Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could this phone be the rumoured flash-based iPod?

    1. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by PabloJones · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe that Steve has specifically said in the past that Apple would not be making a cell phone anytime in the near future.

      But maybe he's had a change of heart. Afterall, if Apple came out with a phone, people would be drooling over it... stylish and easy to use, plus iTunes support. Who knows.

    2. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it could be the first cell phone with HD. I still think they will squeeze one in a PDA first.

    3. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by asland · · Score: 1

      The Zaurus SL-3000 has a 4GB hard drive. Available in Japan only, of course.

    4. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are already two cell phones with 4 GB hard drives. I can't recall which models they were, but they are totally Japan-only deals. Check on engadget, that's where I've seen the stories.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      The Zaurus SL-3000 has a 4GB hard drive. Available in Japan only, of course.

      It's not like the HD in the Zaurus really does anything you couldn't do before. I mean, there are plenty of PDAs you can buy today where you can get bluetooth, wifi and a hard drive- bigger than 4 GB even. You can't do this on the Zaurus, not even the SL-C3000- not unless you want to get weird and add one of those big, ugly serial bluetooth dongles. *shudder*

      I had a 10 GB hard drive in my Jornada 720 2 years ago. Before that, I had a 2 GB HD- and that 2 GBer only cost $70! Cheap as all get out. I still had wireless even. No bluetooth, but I had no need for it then and still don't. I even had that 2 GB drive in my Newton MP2100. First HD in a PDA, indeed.

      I wouldn't quite say only available in Japan... You can order one and get it shipped to you anywhere in the world very easily, no more work than any other online store.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    6. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      I have a Motorola flip-phone. It's small, but it would not have to be made too much bigger to be able to hold a CF card. SD cards are even smaller, and go up to a gigabyte now. Just set it to play a different song depending on who's calling.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    7. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by jim_v2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, an Apple phone...it'd be the size of a business card, transparent, and you'd be able to dial, hangup, change options, volume, play music, type messages, etc all with one button!

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    8. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even had that 2 GB drive in my Newton MP2100. First HD in a PDA, indeed.
      So Apple was indeed the first to have a HD in a PDA?

    9. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      But maybe he's had a change of heart.

      Remember when tabbed browsing in Safari would never happen because it violated Apple GUI guidelines?

      I hope he has had a change of heart because an apple phone would kick ass. Assuming it was a PDA too, not just a cell phone with a button that allows you to empty your wallet at the iTMS.

    10. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by PabloJones · · Score: 1

      It seems like he may have sort have had a half change of heart, and that's the reason Moto is in on this. It may well technically be branded as a Motorola phone, with Apple-esque design and GUI ease of use, as well as the stuff to empty your wallet.

      Either Apple makes money by getting a portion of each phone sold, or they are hoping that people's phones will fill up really quick with music, and then these people will break down and purchase iPods as well, or a combination of both.

    11. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by tdhillman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The nature of cell phones these days is that they are basically free- unless Apple markets a product that will be free bundled with service, they won't be able to make a dent in the market. Apple's greatest successes have come when they have truly energized the market or created something "different." There are far too many playrs already in the cell phone market for Apple to gain substantial market share by grabbing at an elusive golden ring.

      The iPod was (and is) still a revolutionary product that will eventually come back to the field. I can't see Apple defining the playing field in cell phones.

      --
      befuddled (noun) 1. Unable to create a pithy sig
    12. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by stang7423 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe Motorola will build the phone, with apple branding. that Steve Jobs is a wily little ... Better stop before I piss any one off.

    13. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by nelsonal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Free to the consumer, but not to the cellular phone company. Nokia, Motorola, and Ericsson could not build phones that are that filled with expensive components for carrier prices. The average global cell phone goes for ~$150, and that includes a ton of basic phones for pre paid plans. Check the price of a phone without a service plan (say to replace a damaged or lost phone). The average subsidy is probably $150 now. Of course there is no free lunch, you pay for the phone over the life of your contract.
      An iPod cell phone would be good for carriers (exclusivity would help sign up customers), and good for Apple, half the cost is not paid directly by the consumer so you will sell considerably more.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    14. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free cell phones? In the US and a few other places, sure, but in many places, rather than offer free cell phones and draconian service agreements, you buy your cell phone and mobile subscription separately.

      I'm perfectly happy paying a few hundered euros for a good cell phone when I can get decent terms for the mobile subscription.

    15. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by pretentiousPPC · · Score: 2, Funny

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      --
      Artist will always make art.
    16. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      The nature of cell phones these days is that they are basically free

      They're only free in the US, which in the world of mobile phones is a pretty insignificant market when compared to the saturation of mobile phones in other countries. Because Americans won't pay for phones, we rarely see any of the good ones, or get outdated tech.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    17. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      No, no, not bad at all. It's just the way apple does things.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    18. Re:Flash-based iPod actually a phone? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "..."all with one button!"

      make that a glowing button.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  2. iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wonder if there will be a U2 Edtion of the phone, all black, and with a #14 Key :)

    I also want a Moof ring tone!

    /end apple fan-boy-rant

    1. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      About that #14... is there a reason behind it, or did U2 really think that it was 4?

      For those who don't know, in U2's "Vertigo," Bono chants at the beginning of the song "uno dos tres quatorce (sp?)" which is "1 2 3 14 in spanish... strange.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    2. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by alanoneil · · Score: 0

      I believe it is not actually Bono, but a sample from some other song that is incorrect.

      And 14 is 'catorce' in Spanish.

      --
      --
    3. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by wankledot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd really like to know the answer to this as well. It bothers me every time I hear it.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    4. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by nordicfrost · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think it has something to do with the number of records (albums + EPs) that U2 has released, "HOWTO Dismantle an atomic bomb" being the 14th. Not sure, but I sure as hell reacted when I first heard the count up. :)

    5. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by Al+Dimond · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I believe he's turning the volume up to 14, a la Spinal Tap.

    6. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by jbarket · · Score: 1

      That would be 11, Mr Jennings.

      --

      -----
      jonathan barket
    7. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by DavidpFitz · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      About that #14... is there a reason behind it, or did U2 really think that it was 4?

      For those who don't know, in U2's "Vertigo," Bono chants at the beginning of the song "uno dos tres quatorce (sp?)" which is "1 2 3 14 in spanish... strange.

      Actually, you can buy official U2 t-shirts with "1, 2, 3, 14" on them, so it's very much intentional. It's the number of albums they've done and although Vertigo is not the title track of the album, it was the first single to be released from it.

    8. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by c4miles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      About that #14... is there a reason behind it,or did U2 really think that it was 4?

      On UK radio recently, Bono was asked this question - his response was a non-committal "Oh, OK, we may have had a few beers the night we wrote that one.".

    9. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by sagefire.org · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you really want Moof, follow the link below.

      http://www.sagefire.org/index.php/2004/11/07/macos _classic_sound_pack_v1_4

      Clink-Klank, Quack, and Boing are there too.

    10. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by olcrazypete · · Score: 1

      I just hope the speakerphone goes all the way to 11...

      --
      -- My dog can beat up your dog.
    11. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      I own a Moof shirt, but I think we are talking about different Moofs :)

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    12. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by JHromadka · · Score: 3, Informative

      It refers to Steve Lillywhite producing their 1st, 2nd, 3rd and fourteenth albums.

      --
      "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    13. Re:iPhone, uPhone we all phone for iphone... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "And 14 is 'catorce' in Spanish."

      Man, it's like those Spanish have different word for everything....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Not to shabby by Flyinace2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cellular would be the next logical area for apple to explorer. While i think a dedicated Apple Cellular phone would be interesting i don't think it would fly. A joint venture would be a good alternative. Make a slimmed downed ituens for a mobile device. Though i dobt VZW would carry such a cool phone...i mean they finally got bluetooth and look how that mess turned out.

    --
    -Will
    1. Re:Not to shabby by Vulcann · · Score: 1

      Cellular would be the next logical area for apple to explorer. While i think a dedicated Apple Cellular phone would be interesting i don't think it would fly....

      An apple phone with iTunes and can fly! I've gotta get me one of those ;-)

  4. Vice President? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Eddie Cue has pre-empted the suprise and fawning over what could have been a Steve Jobs suprise announcement then Mr. Cue may very well be a Former Vice President by the time MacWorld Expo rolls around.

  5. Re:I see... by 4what4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    well, motorola is the company that is going to be delivering the application, so I think the apple related logo at the top has got to go........

    anyway, Eddy Cue is about to be fired, leaking a comment a couple weeks before macworld, and a couple of days before christmas????? not that any of his comments are going to slow down the sale of any apple produced products, it is still a slip and he must be cut loose, there can't be any leaks in the apple ship

  6. I'm still waiting... by dnaboy · · Score: 1

    For the U2 edition newton.

  7. As two rumors converge by xxblackice · · Score: 5, Interesting

    it seems that this phone + mp3 player might be the convergence of the "flash based" ipod and the apple/motorola venture. Mac heads gotta have their lifeblood flowing...rumors...mmmm

    1. Re:As two rumors converge by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IIRC, the Apple / Motorola venture to ad iTunes compatibility to cell phones was announced. The flash music-only thing was just a distortion by people that didn't know about the deal when it was made many months ago.

  8. hurray by spac3manspiff · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    sarcasm>
    Now we get white shiny phones with bluetooth
    /Sarcasm>

  9. What brand name? by dnaboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder whether this will be branded as an Apple phone or as a Motorola phone. Seeing as Motorola's marketing gusto seemed to die with the Star-Tac, I'm personally rooting for an Apple phone.

    1. Re:What brand name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... seen the "Hello Moto" ads lately?

    2. Re:What brand name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Introducing the mPod...

    3. Re:What brand name? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Yes. With the sole exception of the RAZR ad that's sporting a really good Dabrye song, they're pretty uniformly awful.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:What brand name? by Kenja · · Score: 0
      " wonder whether this will be branded as an Apple phone or as a Motorola phone."

      Approla or Motople.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:What brand name? by atomico · · Score: 1

      I vote for Motorapple. Logo: a bitten apple with oblique wheels, indicating speedy motion so the apple leave moves in the windy trail...

    6. Re:What brand name? by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      don't forget the one on the train with swayzak's downhill shark jump

      --
      -mkb
    7. Re:What brand name? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen that one yet. I hate the Hello Moto theme, but at least they're starting to use some badass music for them.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    8. Re:What brand name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motorola will take a page from HP's book and call it:

      Apple iPhone from Motorola

      (The Motorola will be in small font...) :)

  10. Mobile Device Teams by wallitron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So many things are becoming an addition to the mobile phone, and different groups teaming up to cover their core areas. Obviously Sony are placed fairly well at the moment with their audio, imaging, comms and gaming devices. Who else will team up to compete?

    Personally, I'd love to see the Nintendo technologies meshed with Apple and Motorola. To me both Apple and Nintendo, lean towards highly usable, simple technology with high build quality.

    Who else is next?

    -----

    Glen Williams

    1. Re:Mobile Device Teams by zagmar · · Score: 1

      Canon and Nokia team up with Creative to release a high-end camera/mp3 ringtone phone.

      Hijinks ensue.

    2. Re:Mobile Device Teams by aliquis · · Score: 1

      You mean an Apple designed PPC nintendo portable gameing console which was based on MacOS X and also had a built in 20GB harddrive would sell well? No way, atleast not if you could also use it as your phone :)

    3. Re:Mobile Device Teams by sita · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd love to see the Nintendo technologies meshed with Apple and Motorola. To me both Apple and Nintendo, lean towards highly usable, simple technology with high build quality.

      Nintendo + Nokia = True

    4. Re:Mobile Device Teams by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Nintendo + Nokia = True

      Really? I figured Nintendo wouldn't touch Nokia after that nGage crap. nGage was anything but elegant or simplistic. Hell, they even took a second stab at it and didn't fix a single damn problem.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    5. Re:Mobile Device Teams by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      You mean an Apple designed PPC nintendo portable gameing console

      I've often though Apple would be smart to partner with Nintendo or Sony to release an emulator that would be built into OS X and allow the playing of their titles. Games could be either on the original media for Sony, or downloads for Nintendo. This would go a long ways to counter the lack of games available for OS X and make money for the Gaming company with increased game sales. Cutting into the actual sale of the systems is not a large concern, since they are often loss-leaders in the first place. They could make money selling USB game pads and accessories, and it would broaden their audience for little cost. I can't think of a good reason why this has not happened. Oh, and it would piss off MS.

    6. Re:Mobile Device Teams by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Cutting into the actual sale of the systems is not a large concern, since they are often loss-leaders in the first place. They could make money selling USB game pads and accessories

      If they do it right, well, what I would consider right ;) it wouldn't cut into the actual sale of the systems at all. What I think they should do is create an emulator with Apple's ease of use only for NES/SNES games and offer downloads of the games for THOSE systems on nintendo.com or something. If they create USB versions of the respective controllers i'd have one of each, and you can bet I'd have all of the good ol' games from those systems.

      Hell, my parents have been searching high and low for Super Mario Bros.

  11. So now by lheal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... we can listen to people on airplanes singing along to their cell phones.

    "...whiskey for my men, beer for my [urph] hosses!"

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  12. ipod add-on speculation by cycledance · · Score: 1, Funny

    i hope they come up with an add-on to merge two everyday gadgets...it would eliminate the need to have an ipod AND a mobile phone in my pocket

    1. Re:ipod add-on speculation by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

      This phone certainly will not replace your iPod. It'll be flash based and as such probably hold a measley 512mb or so. Granted that's a lot for a phone but.. it's still pretty small as opposed to 20-60gigabytes. So ifyou're like me and have really random listening habits... you might find 512mb to 1gig is really... small for your listening pleasure. let's just say it wouldn't be replacing my ipod anytime soon

    2. Re:ipod add-on speculation by cycledance · · Score: 0

      no...iam talking about ipod+motorola phone module+ipod firmware making the add-on usable with a new phone interface on the ipods display

    3. Re:ipod add-on speculation by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like George Carlin once said:

      "If you nail together two things that have never been nailed together before, some schmuck will buy it from you."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  13. The town bike by gremlins · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow first the merger with IBM now a team up with Motorola. Apple is like the town bike slashdot stories everyone is getting a ride.

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    1. Re:The town bike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when did they ever merge with IBM?

  14. Apple can do what noone else can... by Duncan3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You heard it here first, Apple will invent the iPhone, the first phone in the world to work as ... a PHONE!

    Because ya sure as heck can't but a phone now, sure a PDA, or a camera, or any of that, but nothing that you can use to talk to people with for more then 15 seconds at a time, with a battery that lasts more then 30 minutes before the thing superheats and burns your hand.

    They will sell exactly ONE of them, to me, since I'm the only one on the planet that wants such a rediculous product!

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Apple can do what noone else can... by mlk · · Score: 1

      I went into a phone shop two days ago.
      Most major phone companys had a camera & java-less phone!
      http://www.nokia.co.uk/nokia/0,,46548,00.html

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:Apple can do what noone else can... by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      • You heard it here first, Apple will invent the iPhone, the first phone in the world to work as ... a PHONE!

      Motorola already had a real phone (and I still do). This beast has a plain old LCD display (not color), takes no pictures, has survived numerous falls onto concrete, has battery life that won't quit, and a speakerphone that works fairly well. I almost switched carriers when I was told I would have to "upgrade" after they "upgraded" their network. It took 3 or 4 calls before I actually got someone who let me keep the phone. So I stuck with them. ... hmmm, I suck as a consumer sometimes - my phone is over 2.5 years old and until it breaks, I'll have zero desire for a new one.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:Apple can do what noone else can... by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

      Wow. does that thing come with a briefcase for carrying it around? I won't use a cellphone unless there's a chance I might accidentally swallow it.

      --
      ||:|::
    4. Re:Apple can do what noone else can... by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Well it is aptly named "TimePort", heh. I don't think u suck as a consumer though - I think you're actually a 'smart' consumer. You want to perform specific functions, and have bought something which fulfills those specific needs. Apart from the very high-end models (which have only recently broken the 1MP level), camera phones are good for nothing except getting 'up-skirt' pictures. A colour screen, a ringtone that doesn't jar (this is POV, I guess), speakerphone and Snake are all I ask from my phone :-p 3120

    5. Re:Apple can do what noone else can... by Senjaz · · Score: 1

      The Mot Timeport was a brilliant phone. Full of useful features. I got it because it was the first tri-band phone, had an in-built dictaphone function, modem and IrDA.

      It's also interesting to note rumours of an updated StarTAC style handset:

      http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000713022463/

      If this was the phone to include iTunes I'd buy one without question. I loved my original StarTACs and went through several versions of them before the Timeport came out.

      --
      Don't blame me - this .sig had steal me written all over it.
    6. Re:Apple can do what noone else can... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Also, the Ericsson T100. No camera or anything, small, a nice clean, simple design, even a scroll thing. Have to recommend it.

    7. Re:Apple can do what noone else can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES or if you can get one from a hackshop that works one of the ADMA/GSM didlies are AWSOME. They do something realy cool: their rock solid (ok ericson T62u's faceplace is wussy) but they (*drum roll please*) place and send decent calls.

  15. Apple is killing the iPod Image by dteichman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The iPod's image is a small object that is stylish, easy to use, and has enough space for your music. Through doing BS like this, they are destroying that image that has been so successful. The only advantage of having a phone that plays music purchased from Apple's music store is the fact that people will be buying their ringtones from Apple instead of the service provider. Of course, you will end up with people who think this crap is really 'schweet' and they will use their iPhones to play music extremely loudly from the phone's crappy built-in speakers.

    1. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Through doing BS like this, they are destroying that image that has been so successful.

      This may be a whacky idea, but have you considered waiting until you actually see a product before you condemn it?

    2. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by CALI-BANG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i have mod points, i can modded you up but i'll just reply instead.

      for now, iPod is doing well; but sooner or later some competitors will catch up.

      this things happens in the philippines and i dunno how it affects other parts of the world. 7 years ago, star-tac is the king; it was overrun by nokia when nokia 3210 comes out of the market -- and then stays the lead until now and very very few people are buying motorola phones. 4 years ago, ericsson is not doing well in mobile phone market ... and now after teaming up with sony -- they capture the old market formerly held by nokia.

      This joint venture by Apple and Motorola is a win-win for both of them. Design/Interface/Usability teams will add value to a technology competitive products from Motorola -- like what Sony did to Ericsson.

    3. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Or they could be bringing the iPod's image to the phone world.

      Sure, everyone's used a cellphone already... but we haven't see what Apple can pull out of their hat for the phone world yet.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by dteichman · · Score: 1

      Not that Apple doesn't make some nice stuff, but do you really want to see a Apple-designed cell phone? Phones would become almost status-symbols.

      Imagine: iPod2

    5. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by justMichael · · Score: 1
      The iPod's image is a small object that is stylish, easy to use, and has enough space for your music. Through doing BS like this, they are destroying that image that has been so successful. The only advantage of having a phone that plays music purchased from Apple's music store is the fact that people will be buying their ringtones from Apple instead of the service provider. Of course, you will end up with people who think this crap is really 'schweet' and they will use their iPhones to play music extremely loudly from the phone's crappy built-in speakers.
      uhh, Maybe it will be a phone with a hard disk that will be able to play FairPlay encrypted files.

      Or if you prefer, an iPod that has a phone in it.

      If all it did was play AAC ringtones I don't know that Apple would waste the ink on a contract with Motorola.

      If I can remove one more item from my pocket, it's a win. Although personally my keys annoy me more than anything else.
    6. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't they already? what about the people with the super itty bitty phones, etc.?

    7. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Are cell phones really not status symbols for many people already? Or do I live in a different world than you?

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    8. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by dteichman · · Score: 1

      A phone is not a real status symbol. It is more of an accessory now. Like a bracelet or necklace.

    9. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite. What is the point you're trying to make?

      Not that Apple doesn't make some nice stuff, but do you really want to see a Apple-designed cell phone? Phones would become almost status-symbols.

      Phones already are status symbols. They've been for a long time, since the first consumer cell phones were sold. And iPods are status symbols too. I fail to "imagine" the upheval. You talk about the iPod's image. It is the iPod's image that makes it the status symbol that it is. Unless they screwed it up, I don't see why an iTMS phone would be much different, except that it was a phone, obviously.

      Why would anyone have to listen to music on a built-in speaker? See, there are these new fangled things called headphones. You can even use the headphone jack to hook your mp3/music player up to a real live stereo! Even one with speakers as big as your closet! Or house! It doesn't matter what that music player is- an mp3/wma CD player, an iPod, some lame 128 MB flash-based MP3 player, a PDA (even crappy Palm OS devices can do it these days!), or ... a phone! A number of cell phones already play MP3s. People use them as PDAs too!

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    10. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) The articles says its not going to compete with the iPod.

      2) Because a phone has a speaker, you assume that this is what they will be using to play the music? Many phones have FM radios built in and everybody uses earphones. What makes you think this will be different? Why would anyone want to listen to music through such a crappy speaker and why would Apple propose they do that?

      3) The iPod's image is a small object that is stylish, easy to use, and has enough space for your music. So by teaming up to make phones it will automatically be large, ugly and difficult to use and thus destroy their iPod image? That's just stupid. See 1) and take a look at the iPod.

      Frankly I would love an Apple designed phone.
      1) I would get a great looking phone.

      2) With Steve Jobs' perfectionism, he would not insert features that were subpar, or improve those features until they were up to snuff. I may finally get a modern cameraless phone, or a phone with a decent camera. The former is difficult to find, the later does not exist.

      3) Better user interface. I have been thinking about writting an app for Java enabled phones. While I have no idea if any phones are capable of running what I have in mind, its a moot point. The input method sucks so much. Apple may improve on this.

      4) The phone would undoubtedly sync with Adress Book and other useful software.

    11. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by macshit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose it's only a small thing, but I think Apple could at least bring their good design sense to bear.

      For all the huge number of cell-phone makers and phones, about 70% of them are completely awful in design, and most of the rest merely OK; even manuf.s who are normally good at product design, like Sony, seem to completely lose it when it comes to cell-phones (in Sony's case, they seem to be partnering with Ericson, so perhaps it's the latter's fault).

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    12. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      for now, iPod is doing well; but sooner or later some competitors will catch up.

      Maybe, but this is harder to do than with the phones.

      The iPod is so dominant not only because of the iPod but also iTunes and iTMS. Not many companies out there have the talent to pull off hardware/software/service solutions so elegantly. Even MS, who should be able to easily take care of the last two is having trouble - the vast majority of online music sales are AAC, not WMA.

      I think that Apple's interest in a phone is not only to deliver some kind of music service, but I'd look for some kind of iChat hooks as well - either simple texting or building to some kind of eventual videophone functionality. Quicktime in the phone is overkill for just music - there are bigger goals here.

    13. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I personally like the idea of phone/music-player integration, and here is why:
      • I allways have to carry my phone with me, so why carry an other device?
      • If I listen to music (radio bcast, mp3 whatever) on an other device than my phone, that device would not know if I had an incoming call. Of course my phone would ring/buzz, but I would not hear/feel it (remember? my ears are plugged). That usually makes all the other people around me (especially the one who is on the phone) pissed off of me.
      • I use a headset with my phone (lot of public transportation and other noisy places), so it is better if I do not have to have two sets of earplugs hanging on my neck

      So if Motorola and Apple can come up with with a good phone that is also a decent music player, I could be a switcher. (currently I own a nokia 6230)
    14. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't know what cell phone do you have but please don't imagine that all cell phones are just a bunch of keys with a black and white two line's high screen....

      For example almost all the new 3G phones for the AU (http://www.au.kddi.com/seihin/index.html) network have access to an online system to buy music and play it with a decent quality, just like a standard mp3 player ....
      Vodaphone 3G phones should also be able to play music as well, and Docomo also got a music player cell phone out for Xmas...

      Anyway Apple/Motorola is not the only one thinking of selling online music for cell phones (actualy they are bit late ?), and there must be a bunch of monney to get from this market....

    15. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, it'll probobly be like "No bluetooth. Clunkier than a Nokia. Lame." anyways : )

    16. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 1

      I really don't think Steve Jobs would let Motorola put out a piece of crap. This is probably one of his pet projects which he is going to make sure comes out right. Having a pissed Steve Jobs over your shoulder is not something you want. He is probably all over this venture to make sure its done right. Given that Moto has done a great job lately with the Razr V3 and Mpx220 I wouldn't discount them from designing a phone that makes this whole Itunes venture work.

    17. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by swissfondue · · Score: 1

      Come on, ringtones as we know them are passé, dead. Very soon, all new phones will just play any song/sound file (mp3, aac, wma...ugh) same as your iTunes or Mediaplayer. No more buying ringtones from phone companies. As soon as "air bandwith" is high enough, phone companies will be selling mp3/aac/wma songs just as any online music store.

      --
      Rubies and Pearls are not what you think.
    18. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Golias · · Score: 1

      Are cell phones really not status symbols for many people already? Or do I live in a different world than you?

      Yes. The parent poster lives in 2004 World. You live in 1974 World.

      Mobile phones have not been status symbols since back when they were called cell phones.

      Some guy answers a mobile phone in a public place, it's not like all the ladies are going to go, "oooo! He can afford a $200 gadget and a $40/month service contract! I wonder if he's a doctor or a CEO or something... I hope he's not already married!"

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      " Are cell phones really not status symbols for many people already? Or do I live in a different world than you?"

      Nope...really more of a commodity these days. Pretty much everyone has at least one of them....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by fermion · · Score: 1
      The interesting thing is I still have my startac. I don't know what i would have bought if I had been in the market for a phone in the past few years, but i know the phone to get now is a razr.

      So many of the phones are sold as a cheap thing you can throw away when your contract runs out(now a draconian two years), or a feature ladened behemeth that you can impress your freinds with. Motorola still seems to be the company that will produce quality irrespective of a price point.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    21. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, everyone's sick and tired of iPods already.

    22. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by nordicfrost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sony, seem to completely lose it when it comes to cell-phones (in Sony's case, they seem to be partnering with Ericson, so perhaps it's the latter's fault).

      Well, Sony had fricking awfully designed mobile phones before they teamed up with Ericsson. Sony Ericsson is a really good example of a product merger gone the right way. Ericsson has all that AND a bag of chips when it comes to telecommunications and mobile phones, but theyr design was outdated since they didn't believe that anyone other than business people wanted to buy mobiles, so they got shafted by Nokias youth-inspired phones. Sony knows how to make something stylish and chuck it full of features. The result is, very cool. A phone that has the most features from Sony and takes a hard beating like a real Ericsson phone.

      Apple should have teamed up with Sony Ericsson.

    23. Re:Apple is killing the iPod Image by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I see. So nobody buys the newest $5000 Sony Ericsson phone and wears it conspicuously on their belt or waving it around.....

      It may not be the same status symbol as it was in the 70s and 80s, but having a phone with all the bells and whistles is something of a status thing in certain groups.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  16. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Polly want a cracker?

  17. motorola quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hopefully it won't feel like a plastic toy. maybe someday motorola will take a look at samsung and build a quality phone.

    1. Re:motorola quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe someday motorola will take a look at samsung and build a quality phone.

      This is a joke, right? Samsung phones IME have a crap UI and fall apart. If you want a decent phone, look to Siemens or Ericsson.

    2. Re:motorola quality? by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      actually, I must say, after using that new Razor phone they have (the uber-thin one) I'm impressed. I used to have to hawk the Startacs and Timeports they used to make (they were such shit) but its a huge step up in quality. If I wasn't jonesin' for a Sidekick 2 right now, I'd consider it.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
  18. An Apple Rep made a comment about future products? by ravenspear · · Score: 1

    Will Eddy be keeping his job?

  19. One feature I hope for. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Is a lockout by Apple that prevents cellular companies from charging every time you want to transfer a tune, photo, or other stuff via Bluetooth.

    Every phone that I could use in my area is hobbled by SOB carriers who view BT as headset only, and charge for transfer of photos, ringtones and everything else.

    Not that I want the latest MP3 of Poo Doody as my ringtone, or want to take blurry, oversaturated photos with my phone...It's the principle of the thing...

    May Apple destroy the phone market as they have beaten the mp3 market.

    1. Re:One feature I hope for. by austad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then buy your phone from somewhere like MobileBee Only the carrier branded phones are crippled, the rest are wide open as the manufacturer intended.

      I picked up a K700i a few months ago there, and it's nice that I can use all of the features on it. You will pay quite a bit more for the phone though, but if you use your phone as much as I do, it's worth it. Wireless bluetooth tether to a laptop for net access is a lifesave sometimes.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    2. Re:One feature I hope for. by THotze · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you've got a point here.... you look like you're willing to pay for a nice, well-made phone that's stylish, well-made and has features you want in an easy-to-use manner, like what the Mac is to computers (arguably, but go along with me on this one) or what the iPod is to MP3 players.

      Some other people have pointed out that when people have gotten 'cool' phones in the past with popular features - say, bluetooth synchronization with computers - cell networks lock them out.

      I think Steve Jobs realizes how much money could be made in a phone that syncs with bluetooth the way its made to be done, as is evidenced by iSync, etc.

      And I think that Apple may be the only company in the position to get people to do what cell phone companies can only dream of - PAY for a consumer phone. Even if the phone is $500, there's a chance - a decent one - that Apple, if it is Apple-branded, could make it sell, just the way that Apple sold the original iPods so well, despite their price and that they were Mac-only for so long.

      Tim

    3. Re:One feature I hope for. by adrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a Sony Ericsson T610 camera phone with T-Mobile service and a D-Link Bluetooth dongle. I can transfer whatever I want (MIDI ringtones, pictures, wallpaper, whatever) to and from the phone for free. Of course, I get charged if I take a picture and beam it to someone else through T-Mobile--but it's just as easy to move it to my Mac and email it.

      Apple includes a very good Bluetooth utility for browsing and transferring files on the phone. And iSync automatically syncs my address book with the contacts in the phone. Awesome.

    4. Re:One feature I hope for. by JJahn · · Score: 1
      Can you get decent Cingular coverage in your area? I have a Sony-Ericsson T637 from them, and not only did it come SIM unlocked (I checked with a T-Mobile SIM, I'm not just guessing), the Bluetooth features are completely unhindered. I can use it with my Powerbook for GPRS internet, transferring images, any MIDI ringtone, and whatever else I could ever need on my phone.

      Definitely Verizon are bastards for crippling their Bluetooth phones, but it seems Cingular has not followed that path (yet?)

    5. Re:One feature I hope for. by Helmut+Kool · · Score: 1

      Apple Bluetooth utility for browsing files on the phone? Where is that program located? I can send files to the phone and the Mac can receive files that are sent from the phone, but is there such a utility that can actually browse the phone's memory?

    6. Re:One feature I hope for. by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you have the bluetooth icon in the menubar, simply click on that and choose "Browse Device".

      If you don't have that turned on, you can in the bluetooth preference panel. It's not the finder by any means, but still is quite useful.

    7. Re:One feature I hope for. by Refrag · · Score: 2, Informative
      Every phone that I could use in my area is hobbled by SOB carriers who view BT as headset only, and charge for transfer of photos, ringtones and everything else.
      You've got to be kidding! I have a T616 and Cingular and I use Bluetooth for transferring pictures from my phone to my Mac, MIDI files from my Mac to my phone, and synchronizing Address Book and iCal information between the two all of the time.

      And I did all of that long before I got a Bluetooth headset.

      How could the carrier even begin to charge for stuff like that?
      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    8. Re:One feature I hope for. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      So, regular phones (not symbians like series 60,80) can't get bluetooth files?

      I am not totally sure but I think you can send anything over OS X to phone (midi etc) via bluetooth menu.

      I am not sure if it works in your configuration.

      BTW, we should boycott buying ring tones (especially midi). They are overcharged CRAP and let me tell something, artists aren't getting paid for those $2 each midis which are basically an awful disastrous implementation of their art by some tavern keyboarder type guy.

    9. Re:One feature I hope for. by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. The lengths the cellular companies go to to extract money from you is pathetic.

      However AFAIK the european market is more lenient and the Japanese market is more tech-and-style hungry. They could probably market the phone without it being crippled. Wouldn't that be a slap in the face to the American market.

      Also, and I'm not sure what the expenses of this would be, they could just make up a network but just roam on others. If it had 802.11b built in you could do internet calls for free, which would help offset that expense. Or convince the more desperate networks (I'm looking at you, Sprint-Nextel) to agree to their terms in order to secure the iPo... uh I mean Apple's help.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    10. Re:One feature I hope for. by adrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      All the Bluetooth stuff is in Applications --> Utilities. The one you want is Bluetooth File Exchange. Don't be prepared for blistering speed--I get 7 KB/sec...

    11. Re:One feature I hope for. by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      Apple includes a very good Bluetooth utility for browsing and transferring files on the phone.

      I disagree on that. Bluetooth phones should mount on the desktop when connected and I should be able to browse it with a Finder window. I think the browser now is clunky at best.

      FWIW only Verizon charges people to use hardware features.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  20. Interesting. by nativespeaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hm...it doesn't look like they'll be able to use the name iPhone...Nuvio's got it locked up:

    http://www.iphone.com/

    1. Re:Interesting. by dnaboy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... iTones maybe?

    2. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how about:

      iCall
      iHearStatic
      iDropOut
      iCallBack
      iCan'tHearYou
      iHaveNoSignal
      iNoBattery
      iCurseNetwork

    3. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you check out iphone.org?

    4. Re:Interesting. by yingjie · · Score: 1

      Going to http://www.iphone.org/ brings you to Apple, though...

    5. Re:Interesting. by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Holy crap: I don't work in marketing (a contradicition?) and I could come up with..... wait for it....

      iListen or iTalk

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    6. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its done that since '99 though

    7. Re:Interesting. by syukton · · Score: 1

      iFone, then?

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    8. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iAmOnTheTrain

    9. Re:Interesting. by MouseR · · Score: 1

      That's because Apple already owns the domain.

      It's been reported countless times already is was/is the foundation for the rumored Apple-branded phone.

      This "official" announcment is nothing that rumor-mongers haven't laid out already.

    10. Re:Interesting. by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      iHatethisnamingspeculation

    11. Re:Interesting. by spanielrage · · Score: 1

      "iPhone" is too lame for Apple anyhow... I could see something like "iCall" or "iNoService".

    12. Re:Interesting. by mystereys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, http://www.iphone.org/ leads to the apple website...

      --
      "Righteous speed demon and trust fund party darling of justice"
    13. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting that they use a PowerBook in the iphone.com image on the main page.

    14. Re:Interesting. by Mercaptan · · Score: 1

      Dude, clearly it's going to be called the "iCell", which will be exactly what it does.

      --
      -- "Sucks to your ass-mar"
    15. Re:Interesting. by lxrhee · · Score: 1

      iCanHearYouNow...Good! if it's flash-based it better be damn small, cos I'd rather have an apple fone with a 60GB hard-drive if it's no bigger than the iPod

  21. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by goon+america · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet you'll have to madly spin around a little touch wheel in order to dial it. Like a rotary phone.

  22. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just old enough to remember phones with no buttons or dials.

  23. Already in bed? by sweetaction · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2002/jul/17isync.h tml Cingular and Apple are already buddies. With Moto's exclusive offering of the new RAZR phone with Cingular, perhaps are budding relationship will truly blossom with an iPhone to tie it all together.

    Go Apple.

    1. Re:Already in bed? by Go_Ask_Alex · · Score: 1

      Cingular a buddy? Cingular simply didn't cripple their subsidized T68s to prevent them from syncing via bluetooth. I guess that deserves a PR nod from Apple? Whenever the iPhone comes out I hope I can buy it straight from Apple, unlocked with original firmware. That's worth the full-price premium to me.

    2. Re:Already in bed? by vought · · Score: 1

      You might be closer to the truth than you think.

      Then again, Apple s good at playing vendors off each other.

  24. Motorola Apple Relations Improving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • Apple undercut the market for Motorolla's $200 CodeWarrior with a suite of free developer tools.
    • Motorola's StarMax Mac clone was end-of-lifed when Apple killed MacOS licensing.
    • Apple, IBM, and Motorola have had a difficult time resolving design and licensing issues in the PowerPC development line.
    • Apple was heavily embarassed by Motorola's inability to produce sufficient 500mhz G4's after a roll-out of new machines far exceeded expected demand.
    If Motorola is now in bed with Apple, you can bet that we're talking a major financial deal to sweeten the partnership.
    1. Re:Motorola Apple Relations Improving? by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) Uh, CodeWarrior was by Metrowerks, and AFAIK, there was never an OS X version. Apple's tools for OS 9 were less than useful in comparison to CodeWarrior, but by all accounts, Xcode is infinitely superior. The fact that it's free is a nice side benefit, but serious developers don't really care that much about what the development environment costs as long as it's a good value.

      2) The rug got pulled out from all the other cloners, too, most of whom were doing FAR more business than the Starmax series.

      3) The PPC/CHRP/AIM alliance (whatever they're calling it this week) had a lot of problems that may or may not have been Motorola's fault. Until the PPC 970 (G5) and 750fx (G3), IBM wasn't exactly delivering that many CPUs to Apple, which leads into...

      The G4 debacle was really the first time Mot had trouble delivering what Apple asked for. After that it was all downhill. Of course, Mot's semiconductor division is a separate company now (Freescale).

      Your last point is really your only good one, but I can't say as I disagree with your conclusion. Jobs has been pretty angry with Mot ever since the whole G4 debacle, but the Freescale spin-off might have softened that anger somewhat. I suspect Mot had to do some serious ass-kissing to get this deal to fly.

      p

    2. Re:Motorola Apple Relations Improving? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Codewarrior 7 ran on OS X. Codewarrior was bought by Motorola, but whereas Codewarrior saved Apples bacon back during the the 68k to PPC transition, they were late to the game for OS X and simply couldn't keep pace with the excellent tools that came over with NeXT.

      Codewarrior positioned itself for cross-platform development instead, which is what interested Motorola, but wasn't compatible with Apple's focus on superior APIs.

      Apple didn't kill Codewarrior as much as Codewarrior chased different markets.

      Mots influence on the G4 problem was refusing to allow IBM to fab G4s or to improve their processes, which really left Apple in a bind. After all, G4s still run on a 167MHz bus, which is a disaster for a modern desktop CPU.

    3. Re:Motorola Apple Relations Improving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Motorola bought Metrowerks for $95 million dollars. Codewarrior has worked with Mac OS X for a number of releases (my personal experience is only as far back as late 2001). CodeWarrior had 90% of the active Mac software market ever since Symantec's bungling of their transition from 68K to PowerPC architecture. While you may niggle over some of these facts, it should be clear that Apple's release of a free suite of top quality tools severly undercut the value of a big Motorola purchase. While it's arguable both developers were in the right (Apple needed Mac OS X developers, Motorola needed Metrowerks developers) it's clearly a sore spot in Apple Motorola relations.

      2) Because Motorola manufactured the chip in the mac clones themselves, the costs to build their StarMax clones were lower so they didn't need to sell as many machines for equal or greater profit than others. (Indeed a thriving mac clone market was good for them because everyone sold Motorola chips back then). Steve Jobs return and the subsequent slaying of the Mac clone market put a damper on what could have been a lucrative market either as a dealer of computers or as a dealer of chips.

      3) Much of the problem with the PowerPC alliance was their fundamental disagreements over what was a worthwhile design direction. IBM didn't like Altivec. Motorola did. Apple went with Motorola's design and forced IBM to license Motorola's design to ensure backward compatability. No idea whether the rumored Motorola contractual exit met with the supposed one year notifications, but rumors are that it didn't. Again, I'm not trying to say who was in the right. Just that it's another source of bad blood between Motorola and Apple.

    4. Re:Motorola Apple Relations Improving? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      1) It really isn't a sore spot between them. Motorola bought Metrowerks primarily to have a good software suite to go with their embedded processors, and Metrowerks has done quite well for themselves in the embedded market, especially embedded PPC and for Freescale's DSPs. Even back in 98/99, around the time of the Metrowerks purchase, Motorola was already starting to shift focus to making PPCs for the embedded market. By the time Xcode was released, Metrowerks basically didn't care about the desktop software market.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    5. Re:Motorola Apple Relations Improving? by goMac2500 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If there is no OS X version of CodeWarrior, what is this, and why does Apple use Codewarrior as a benchmark for speed against XCode (with Apple even admitting that Codewarrior is still faster)? And yes, Motorola created CodeWarrior. Metrowerks might even still be owned by them.

    6. Re:Motorola Apple Relations Improving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:2, Informative) ?
      OK, the info is half right.
      Motorola, however, didn't create CodeWarrior. Metrowerks developed CodeWarrior and for a very long time, Metrowerks had been an independent company. Motorola then bought Metrowerks.

  25. Let's see... by the+pickle · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) In Sino-Soviet Korea, a Beowulf cluster of iTunes-enabled fone overlords (who I, for one, welcome) plays Natalie Portman naked and petrified in hot grits to old people in a positive manner.
    2) ???
    3) Profit! Because the iPod has made Apple money hand over fist, so a fone that has the same general function (could this be the flash iPod everyone is talking about?) will likely be a giant seller.

    Problem is that cell fones are typically loss leaders for SOMEBODY, and we all know the iTMS is barely profitable, so I just don't see where the money would be coming from here.

    p

    1. Re:Let's see... by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Its more then rediculous!"

    2. Re:Let's see... by HolyGadzooks! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but will it run Linux?

    3. Re:Let's see... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Problem is that cell fones are typically loss leaders for SOMEBODY, and we all know the iTMS is barely profitable, so I just don't see where the money would be coming from here.

      From the same place that Apple gets their money from the iTMS: sales of the iPod. But in this senario, it's not sales of the iPod it's sales of this iPod phone. Whether Apple or Mot is actually doing the hardware-making, Apple will make money on it one way or another- whether they sell it and get that profit, or Mot sells it as has Mot pay.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Let's see... by Subliminal+Fusion · · Score: 1

      The carriers are typically the ones who "lose" money selling phones (which really isn't truly a loss, they more than make up for it in the service charges). Cell phone manufactures don't typically have problems making money on their products. I doubt Apple would be losing money on these either. I was very skeptical about the iPod mini (I still don't really understand its appeal- for $50 more you can have 5 times the storage in a slightly larger, yet still extremely portable case), but they managed to outsell even Apple's predictions, I doubt they'd be wrong on this one either...

    5. Re:Let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who I, for one, welcome

      No, you mean "whom I, for one, welcome".

      IAAAGN
      (I am an anonymous grammar nazi)

    6. Re:Let's see... by Senjaz · · Score: 1

      The last line should read:

      3) Profit! Because the iPod has made Apple money hand over fist, so a fone that has the same general function (could this be the flash iPod everyone is talking about?) will likely be a giant seller, in Japan.

      --
      Don't blame me - this .sig had steal me written all over it.
    7. Re:Let's see... by sci50514 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend from Taiwan. His company sources many components for Apple's iPod. According to him, the hardware profit of the iPod is close to nothing. Apparently Apple is making profit from somewhere. Apple is apparently not telling the complete story where their profits from iPods came from.

    8. Re:Let's see... by tenton · · Score: 1

      Does this friend also know the labor/manufacturing costs? How about Apple's overhead costs? How is he guessing on the price of the components how much Apple is making on the iPod? Is that company also sourcing the hard drives for Apple (from Toshiba and Hitachi), likely the main component in terms of cost? I'm somehow doubting that.

      I'm not sure I believe your friend.

    9. Re:Let's see... by sci50514 · · Score: 1

      This friend owns a company dealing with IT components. Think Sig**Tel chips etc. He is not guessing as he is in the Taiwanese IT business for so many years and can easily break down all the component cost chip by chip. BTW, he is a Taiwanese. I was told several months ago that Apple was already sourcing for parts for the flash mp3 products.

    10. Re:Let's see... by SJ · · Score: 1

      Problem is that cell fones are typically loss leaders for SOMEBODY, and we all know the iTMS is barely profitable, so I just don't see where the money would be coming from here.

      Only in the US.

      Here in Australia you can buy any GSM (we only use CDMA for rural networks) phone from any store and use it on whatever network you are subscribed to. There are some pre-paid packs that are locked to a network but a lot of the time, people buy the phone they want and then subscribe the network they want.

      Oh, and when we change networks, our phone number comes with us.

      The US is so far behind the rest of the world when it comes to mobile phones that it is actually quite funny.

    11. Re:Let's see... by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Oh, and when we change networks, our phone number comes with us.

      Same in the US.

      I'm not denying the state of the US cell fone market sucks, but what you just picked to illustrate it isn't anywhere NEAR the real reason.

      p

  26. tip of the iceberg by Mazzaroth · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I can imagine the features:
    • iTunes ringback (what the caller hears is an iTune bought by the callee)
    • Distinctive iTune ringtone (I can program the ringtone I hear with an iTune I bought, according to the caller)
    • iTunes will not only sync with iPod but also with iPhone
    • iPhone to iPhone gifts (I bought an iTune and I give it to you)
    • iPhone to iPhone recommendations (I recommend an iTune to you)
    • Express your feeling with iTune (when you call her, she hears a music you selected)
    • ...
    it's just the beginning man! Wait 'till Apple sells movies, documentaries and radio shows...
    1. Re:tip of the iceberg by happyhangone · · Score: 1

      and the obvious... Buy and download your songs directly to your phone using gprs or whatever cell internet connectivity protocol they got... or in other words... ipod and roaming itunes in a single package...

    2. Re:tip of the iceberg by phreakv6 · · Score: 1

      iTunes ringback (what the caller hears is an iTune bought by the callee)

      I dont know how this would be possible.Any ringback/call waiting tune is set by the GSM service provider and not by the phone.Technically how can i hear something from the otherside before the otherside picks the call up i.e before i am connected to the otherside ?

      --
      fifteen jugglers, five believers
    3. Re:tip of the iceberg by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dont know how this would be possible.Any ringback/call waiting tune is set by the GSM service provider and not by the phone.Technically how can i hear something from the otherside before the otherside picks the call up i.e before i am connected to the otherside ?

      What's hard to understand about this? Are you aware that this is already being done? If not, consider yourself informed: ringbacks already exist, though they're not big in the US. If you are aware of this, what gives you the idea that having an iTunes purchased song as your ring back would be any different than any other MIDI, mp3 or sound effect that you'd have as a ringback?

      One day, remind me to tell you the story of computers. They transfer data. Sometimes, they just transfer data between the RAM to the CPU over the bus, but now a days, they are often transfering data also between different computers- say a cell provider's servers and a cell phone. A user can buy a song in iTMS-mobile, have the $1 charged to their phone bill, listen to it and go into a little menu where they say "make this my ringback." How it gets to become the ringback could happen in a number of ways. The most likely senario is that the 20 second sound sample- say, the chorus of the song- is accessed by the cell provider's server, no doubt via connecting to some iTMS server. It could grab that 20 seconds of song and set it as the ringback, however those whacky GSM service providers go around doing that.

      The user could probably even have a GUI form on the phone that gives them the illusion that they're "recording" the section they want for their ring back, or perhaps just setting the whole thing. But in the end, it just communicates with the cell provider- who already obviously an agreement with Apple/Mot if they're providing this service already- the hash # for the song in question and the markers for where to begin the sample and where to end it. Simple as that.

      I'll leave the other very possible- but not too likely- method as an exercise for the reader. A hint: it has again with computers communicating. Uploading, even.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:tip of the iceberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me correct you here.

      # Distinctive iTune ringtone (I can program the ringtone I hear with an iTune iBought, according to the caller)

      # iPhone to iPhone gifts (iBought an iTune and iGiveItToYou)
      # iPhone to iPhone recommendations (iRecommend an iTune to you)

    5. Re:tip of the iceberg by sharrestom · · Score: 1

      ...and next thing you will tell me is that there will be an exploding market for creating ringtones, badly I might add, in garageband...

    6. Re:tip of the iceberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Moto phones.. great quality world phones (Quadband GSM) with the best RF of any phones I've ever used...

      But I still can't get any of their BT enabled phones to work via BT using iSync... Grrrr..

      While the features above would be interesting, I'd just like to see Apple and Moto get to a point where Moto Phones work with iSync via BT, retain the great RF performance, and remain great world (quadband GSM) phones.

      My $0.02

  27. Assuming you were serious by lheal · · Score: 1

    Get a Kyocera. I have a 2325, but I don't know if they still sell them. The battery life is great, the sound is fine, and there are no moving parts to break.

    I get about two hours of talk time on a full charge, which takes an hour or so. Idle time charge lasts about four days, sometimes more (if I stay near a tower). It doesn't suffer from heat problems.

    And it has Tetris.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Assuming you were serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Kyocera. I have a 2325, but I don't know if they still sell them. The battery life is great, the sound is fine, and there are no moving parts to break.

      I get about two hours of talk time on a full charge, which takes an hour or so. Idle time charge lasts about four days, sometimes more (if I stay near a tower). It doesn't suffer from heat problems.

      And it has Tetris.


      Obviously you didn't read the guys post properly. He want's a phone, not portable Tetris. ;-)

    2. Re:Assuming you were serious by ikea5 · · Score: 1
      "there are no moving parts to break."

      ahh the wonderful technology of telepathic dialing...

    3. Re:Assuming you were serious by Commander+Trollco · · Score: 1

      2135 owner here: The battery life is indeed awesome, if only the battery meter would behave properly! I can't count the number of times I've been killed by an automatic shutdown only to have my phone decide that is has a full charge one minute later. Perhaps you have some experience with this...

      --
      http://persianews.on.nimp.org/?u=Tar_Baby
    4. Re:Assuming you were serious by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Hey grandpa it's the 21st century: they make switches and controls that work by capacitive coupling: no moving parts required. The iPod's had them for a long time and my PB's trackpad doesn't use any moving parts.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    5. Re:Assuming you were serious by ikea5 · · Score: 1

      ya, except the phone(Kyocera 2325) doesn't use that

    6. Re:Assuming you were serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is 2 hours talk time and 4 days standby considered awesome, or even good? What are you comparing that to?

      My fiance and I each have a different model Nokia (hers is tiny and mine's a 6800 with the full keyboard) and they both get at least 3-4 hours of real talk time (hers is actually more like 4-5) and standby is 7-10 days. That's pretty typical of all the Nokias we've owned, too.

    7. Re:Assuming you were serious by lheal · · Score: 0

      >meter

      I had one, and I know what you mean. It was an eye-opener for me when I was forced to upgrade: by comparison the 2325 may as well be solar powered, it's so easy on juice.

      The battery actually "recovers" after resting a while. It's part of the physical properies of the battery. The meter is measuring what's available at any given moment; it doesn't know what the battery will have after you stop using it a while.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  28. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by voxlator · · Score: 2, Funny
    Nah, no problem - it's easy.

    You hreak the number you want to dial either by;
    • Whistling various frequencies into the mic for each number to dial
    • Rapidly tapping on the single button, tapping out each number in sequence.

    That said, I'm sure it will be a hit with the /. crowd :)

    --#voxlator
  29. Lousy timing! by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who's going to buy an iPod phone when we've all already gone out and bought Ngages?

    1. Re:Lousy timing! by sagekoala06 · · Score: 1

      you mean someone actually bought a ngage?

    2. Re:Lousy timing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody bought an ngage? who? did we get a name and address?

    3. Re:Lousy timing! by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Hey, the QD isn't that bad!

      (I'm already hard at work building my psychological defensive walls)

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    4. Re:Lousy timing! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Look, I own a freakin' Virtual Boy and I still don't have any desire to get an Ngage.

    5. Re:Lousy timing! by pbf · · Score: 1

      Maybe juste because they are fed up with side talking...

      --
      et les Shadoks pompaient...
  30. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think phones are past status... the numbers are swinging to wireless for future communications...
    Although I am currently considering dropping my t-mobile service for a landline, and dropping the cable modem for dial-up... (I couldn't possibly be the norm tho.)
    I'm trying to be frugal in '05.

  31. Apple Tattoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fellow I know had the Japanese glyph for the word "Apple" tattooed on him because of his Mac fervor. He doesn't speak Japanese and used a simple, web based English to Japanese translation service.

    Apparently people who do speak Japanese tell him that the glyph is more properly translated as "fruit" than as "apple". That isn't a big deal except when he's in the communal showers at the YMCA.

  32. No Wireless... by Thu25245 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay, so it's now wireless. But I bet it'll have less space than a Nomad.

    Lame.

    1. Re:No Wireless... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck cares?

      Lame.

      (or: different strokes for different folks.)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:No Wireless... by cybercyph · · Score: 1

      somebody missed the joke

  33. One is all you need - seriously by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't you like to be able to navigate address books to dial a phone vial the scroll wheel and single click button, just like an iPod? I know I would...

    Potentially this new phone could all cross licence the UI and be a real boon for Motorola.

    As for diaing numbers not in the address book - voice reognition, I'd wager.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:One is all you need - seriously by ATomkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For some reason, I don't think this idea of yours will take off...

  34. Perfect timing! by dourk · · Score: 1

    My current cellular contract is up in February. I can't wait to go shopping for a new phone!

    --
    Wake up.
  35. Great timing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    eVeryone who tries to use the nGage as a phone, & want to exchange it.

  36. Re:I'll buy by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 1

    Ehh. You're just a wannabe cultist...

    My name is already Steve. No need to name a cat here.


    *shiver* It's like my parents figured it out before I was even born!!!

  37. +5 Flamebait by dteichman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It seems to me, given the +5 Flamebait status on some posts here, that there are a few moderators that have been pushing a pro-Apple agenda in here. Kudos to those of you handing out "Underated" to those posts that have been unfairly moderated down in here.

    1. Re:+5 Flamebait by dteichman · · Score: 1

      And yes, I have a +6 modifier to underrated posts.

    2. Re:+5 Flamebait by Myuu · · Score: 1

      Welcome to /.
      Everyone has an agenda here, whether its pro-FreeBSD or pro-Moz.
      It seems like the only time people actually bitch about agendas is when it is insanely anti-MS or pro-Apple.
      Most of the flamebait articles are infact flamebait. Seriously, I am sick of the anti-Apple bias of some of the users of this site.

      --

      forget it.
  38. Mod parent up by sahonen · · Score: 0, Troll

    'cause I want one.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  39. DUH! by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

    You forgot Apple-Moto, you insensitive CLOD!
    In Soviet Russia, Mobile phones make lame jokes (like these) about YOU!
    And for the grand-finale...(rimshot)...I, for one, welcome our single-mouse-button-mp3-player-trendsetting-moto-b randing overlords.

  40. Will it actually make phone calls? by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please, for the love of god, I just want a phone that will actually make phone calls in my apartment. *whimper*

    I'm not in the boonies. I'm a mere 20 miles East of San Francisco in an area where the median home prices is over $700,000. People have money.

    But I can't make a phone call from my apartment. Verizon comes close, but Cingular, AT&T Wireless, Sprint, Nextel - none of them work.
    My old ass MetroPCS phone is the only phone that I get more than 3 "bars" with. And it doesn't have a camera, either.

    What ever happened to making call quality the #1 priority? I don't want a camera phone! I don't want an mp3 player! I just want to make friggin PHONE CALLS!
    *head as-plodes*

    1. Re:Will it actually make phone calls? by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Hmm, well, the standard of VOIP is pretty good with a good network connection. Maybe you could buy one of those pretty boxes from the guy who makes lindows -- the ones with a RJ11 on one side and ethernet on the other.

      That way you can get a portable phone that will work at home :-)

    2. Re:Will it actually make phone calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We can switch apartments.

      Mine is conveniently located in Helsinki, Finland, where we haven't heard the term 'bad reception' in about 7 years :p

      Its a small flat, the weather is brown-grey rainy and its a tad more east than just east of SF, but hey, we got the networks, baby!

      AC

    3. Re:Will it actually make phone calls? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      What a coincidence! I was just thinking about moving to Finland.

      Dude, can you get DirecTV there?

      All of my favourite goth metal bands are in Finland anyway, and from what I recall the babe:ugly chick ratio was like 5:1 ;)

  41. Telephonic Orgasm by pandich · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that needs a Kleenex after reading this???

    1. Re:Telephonic Orgasm by tenton · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that needs a Kleenex after reading this???

      Yes, you are the only one. At least, I hope so.

    2. Re:Telephonic Orgasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.. Me too..

  42. iTunes on phone does not mean iPod-Phone! RTFA by johnpaul191 · · Score: 5, Informative
    the article says the phone is NOT AN IPOD. we knew Apple made a version of Quicktime for cellphones. this makes it sound like the phone will just use Apple software to playback some MP3/AAC songs on your phone. a dozen songs requires very little flash memory. i would guess the phone would be able to play songs bought at iTMS. the fact that the article mentions putting songs on a phone via bluetooth/cable and how that would bypass the carrier, i guess that means we will not see iTMS shopping via cell phone.

    maybe the rumors are way off and this is what the flash iPod is. the Moto V710 phone has a removable memory card you can put MP3 files on and play them as ringtones, or listen to them on the speakerphone. i guess headphones or a carkit would be possible too? who knows. you have to read the article knowing some are quotes from Apple and Moto and some is filler/speculation by Forbes. not to diss them, but it's possible they don't totally know and are off the mark with their speculation.

    and i quote:
    At the event, Jobs took pains to point out that the phone would not compete with Apple's popular iPod music player, but should viewed as an iPod accessory. "Wouldn't it be great if you could take a dozen of your favorite songs with you" on a cell phone, Jobs said at the time.

    The companies said they plan to release a phone that will connect locally to computers unning Microsoft's Windows as well as Apple's Macintosh computers using a cable or a Bluetooth wireless connection.
    1. Re:iTunes on phone does not mean iPod-Phone! RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not disagreeing with you overall, but want to mention a mobile version of quicktime is not necessary for quicktime media. The phone manufacturers have already been given the code bits they need to incorporate the media without needing a mobile quicktime player while still remaining compatible. That is why Apple considers itself to have a leg up on the competition (real and ms), who are trying to license mobile versions of their players to those same manufacturers. Something about open standards.

  43. No problem with T-mobile by mbaudis · · Score: 1

    as mentioned by another poster, i also have a s-e T610 (actually, two) with t-mobile; and here is the first time i hear about the lockout of bluetooth features with other phones/companies.
    maybe you should switch the carrier? the t610 is very nice as remote, too (using salling clicker ...), though not as advanced as some of the newer nokias (which e.g. show the cover art when using it as itunes remote...).
    though, for a german it is kind of weird to see the familiar ugly magenta "T" logo of the formerly state owned german carrier popping up everywhere in the u.s.

  44. iPhone by capmilk · · Score: 1

    Shameless self-promotion: iPhone is already available. ;)

  45. Re:Motorola created CodeWarrior? Whaaaaa? by Bubba+Bui · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CodeWarrior was released in the early '90s by a small Canadian startup named Metrowerks. When Apple transitioned to the PowerPC and was only able to come up with an abominably slow, clunky and cumbersome development system for it (a set of multipass C++ compilers bundled with their ancient MPW evironment), Metrowerks saved the day by shipping CodeWarrior which had a kick-ass IDE (inspired by Think C, formerly Lightspeed) and a fast, efficient one pass compiler and linker. A few years later Motorola released a compiler plug-in for Codewarrior; then Metrowerks started trying to branch out into other areas such as embedded systems and cross-development systems. Eventually they were bought by Motorola by the end of the '90s.

  46. rob me by ogewo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now the mugger will get a phone with his mp3 player

    1. Re:rob me by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      >> Now the mugger will get a phone with his mp3 player

      At least you can call him and yell, "hey, fuck you!"

  47. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by the31337z3r0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone know where to get a true rotary phone? I want one!

  48. How About iSync? by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about Apple and Motorola produce a phone that fully synchronizes with iSync for all the productivity items like contacts and calendars? The only folks that make such devices are Nokia and Siemens. I want everything down to the photo on the Address Book entry... plus decent enough e-mail for getting warning messages from the servers.

    1. Re:How About iSync? by shepmaster · · Score: 1

      My Motorola V220 does this just fine with iSync. Even has a nice (standard!) USB cable to do it over. No, I can't transfer ringtones or pictures, but I don't really care to. Maybe a well-placed piece of hackery could do that. I'm pretty sure that the rest of the Motorola phones with USB work the same. Check Apples iSync page for specific models.

    2. Re:How About iSync? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I missing something? My Sony-Ericsson P800 synchronizes perfectly with iSync over Bluetooth, Address Book contact photos, calendars and all.

    3. Re:How About iSync? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      You can transfer rings and pictures on the v220 using Motorola's Windows software; I don't think there's anything available for OS X, sadly.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:How About iSync? by Tintivilus · · Score: 1

      Actually, all the contemporary (anything 3G or a GSM since the V3/4/5/600) fully support standard SyncML synchronization via bluetooth, USB, or HTTP. Apple still hasn't gotten around to adding SyncML to iSync, apparently in favor of coddling various proprietary formats. Older Mot phones and most new ones will sync with USB using the old motorola format (may require some OS tweaking to get iSync to recognize the phone as a target), and rumor has it that the next major release of iSync will finally let Motorola phones (and any others with SyncML) sync locally with iSync or over the network with .mac.

  49. dreaming but integration of mini with phone... by mliu · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or would it be really amazing if they released a phone with essentially an iPod mini integrated into it? That's all the convergence device I would need really. Seriously, why hasn't anyone released in the US either a phone or a PDA with a built in HD? The iPod mini shows the hard drive can be pretty damn small.

    With an iPod mini integrated into a phone, you could get phone call making, mp3 playing, and basic PDA functionality all in one. Basically all I need from a mobile device. And you could wrap it all up with a super slick scroll wheel rotary dial interface. Maybe not as easy to use for making number dials as a regular phone, but easy enough, considering I almost never dial in a number manually and 90% of my phone calls go to people I already know. And man that sure would be futuristic retro cool.

    Too bad it's pretty apparent the real device isn't going to be anything like this. I sure think this would be sweet...

    1. Re:dreaming but integration of mini with phone... by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People drop 'em all the time. My phone (Ericsson T100) can survive just about anything, but I doubt it would go as well if it had a HDD in it.

  50. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by Go_Ask_Alex · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nokia beat Apple with a rotary cell phone, it's their Nokia 7280 (http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,,62356,00.html).

  51. Apple Phone Name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems iCel would be most appropriate

  52. The killer product _should_ be... by Boss+Sauce · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...a Bluetooth stereo headset like this Blueant rig. The biggest problems seem to be (1) a fragmented US cell phone market and (2) limited Bluetooth capabilities on the few phones that have it at all. Wouldn't it take a large company to crack these two nuts, and couldn't they be cracked by dealing with manufacturers and service providers at the same time?

    Apple's iPod hardware buddy HP seems to sell might-look-good-in-white, curiously out-of-stock bluetooth stereo headphones, but without a mic. Hmmm...

  53. Classic Apple phone to come by Biotech9 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    All white, beautiful OS, iTunes support, iTMS support, sync to mac and PC.

    But just one button :(

  54. It's not the phone's fault by dtmos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check your renters'/homeowners' associations.

    This happens in my area, too, and it's caused by the NIMBY attitude of people when they see a cell phone tower. Even if the cellular provider proposes a camouflaged tower (one that looks like a tree, etc.), they are beaten back by the pseudoscience wackos threatening health problems. They've even taken out existing towers ("Too close to the schools--think of the children!"), which I suspect is why you remember your MetroPCS phone fondly. As a result, my nearest cell tower is a zillion miles away and, like you, I have no coverage indoors.

    1. Re:It's not the phone's fault by atomico · · Score: 1

      A very suitable explanation, true in many places I know. If I only had mod points...

    2. Re:It's not the phone's fault by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Last year I had a crappy, low-end phone with service through Verizon in LA. My GF also had Verizon service, but had a much nicer phone. She often got much better reception than I did, sometimes even standing right next to me. Because my phone was work-provided, I was able to compare notes with my co-workers, who all reported similar problems.

      But then I changed jobs. On the one hand, I have a much better phone and service now, but on the other hand I now have to pay for it myself :(

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    3. Re:It's not the phone's fault by lxrhee · · Score: 1

      mrs. lovejoy: won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?!

      my lil sis has had a phone since she was 9.. and she was the last of her friends to get one.
      if they're worried about antennas near schools, what about all those metal detectors?

  55. I've been doing this for awhile already? by iamthetru7h · · Score: 0, Troll

    What the hell is with you people and playing MP3's on your phone? I've been doing it for AWHILE. I downsample them of course... I have a SE K700i. It plays MP3's. some of which I use for custom ringtones for certain people who call me, or for groups of people! the do not answer before 10am crowd gets a certain ringtone, my party people friends get a different one, the girlfriend {GASP I READ SLASHDOT, I KNOW WHAT A VAGINA LOOKS LIKE WITH MY OWN TWO EYES THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE PORN OR REFERENCES TO MY MOM) has her own ringtone... all MP3, none paid for or retarded polyphonic stuff. Bluetooth is kickass, but not fast enough for EDGE yet. Hell, the US isn't anywhere NEAR Euro or Asian G3 yet. My K700 can play MP3's over it's speaker, and it ain't bad. It also doubles as an FM radio. And an Alarm CLOCK, and it has all the contacts, calendar events, etc sync'd via bluetooth. It's a crappy camera, but good enough for a quick shot when I'm not toting around any camera at all. It also does voice recording, where a 5 minute recording is good enough, it lets my laptop jump onto the web via GPRS. and the list goes ON AND ON AND ON AND ON. IT DOES a ton of stuff. the battery lasts 3 days, 1 day if I'm on the phone every other 5 minutes and using it for all those other things constantly. But I don't. It does 'enough' and it does it damn well. If you want a phone that goes everywhere and you only use it as a phone, fine. You get your free whatever phone from your provider and you don't bitch. ME? I want a phone that does some of this stuff. I don't want to have to bust out my PDA/Laptop to check my calendar to see whomever's birthday it is while I'm on the bus... Or send a quick email. Or plugin a headset and use it as an MP3 walkman, or an FM portable radio... I want a device that does ENOUGH, good enough. If Apple can make that? as well as they made the iPod? I'll pay 500$ for it. I've paid more for less. Hopefully they'll be able to make something right. IN the meantime. Go buy yourself a sidekick, or maybe an Ngage, and an iPod, and a cell phone, and a Palm and shove 'em in 1 pocket. My phone does all those in one small form factor, and it does all good enough. For now... FOR NOW. There's cool stuff comin' round the corner. All you people need is a little more patience. ~patience is a virtue... have a little, you might one day be considered a virtuous person~

    1. Re:I've been doing this for awhile already? by jbrw · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd prefer to have an enter key rather than a mp3 phone anyday.

      See?

      I win!

    2. Re:I've been doing this for awhile already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats a bit kinda basic though, the functionality on the K700 - its not got anywhere near enough memory.

      Pick up a Moto E398, and you can put in a transflash card, and have up to 256meg of storage. Plenty of space for music playback, it sounds quite good too.

      Or go for a Siemens SX1 (unpopular due to the keyboard layout). You get a smartphone, with fairly decent phone functionality, up to 1gig of hot swappable MMC storage, can support AAC, Ogg and MP3 playback. Has a radio. Plays a wide variety of games.

      And doesn't even cost that much (in some places, that is).

    3. Re:I've been doing this for awhile already? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, well my phone (Motorola v400) has SSH, so nyah.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  56. AAC+ vs. AAC by BL33D · · Score: 1

    The interesting thing with a potential phone pod would actually be whether the audio codec remains AAC or becomes AAC+. Obviously AAC+ would make more sense when considering over the air download constraints etc. AAC+ would also help on the memory side.... What does the NET think?

  57. Change your phone Carrier by Macka · · Score: 1


    Maybe it's a US thing that they can do that and expect to get away with it. I don't know of any Carrier in the UK that does that sort of thing. I've got a K700i and regularly use Bluetooth with my Mac to sync up the address book, calendar, offload pictures I take with it and most importantly to connect to the phone's GPRS modem for mobile internet access. If I had to funnel the first three through my carrier (Orange) it would cost me a fortune. And the last feature would be impossible.

    I simply would not accept that limitation from a carrier. It's an abuse of their service. Do the sensible thing and change you carrier to someone who doesn't cripple your phone and your computing experience. Then let them know in a letter why you're changing. If enough people do the same, they'll start to get the message.

    1. Re:Change your phone Carrier by revscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I simply would not accept that limitation from a carrier. It's an abuse of their service. Do the sensible thing and change you carrier to someone who doesn't cripple your phone and your computing experience.

      That's the thing, though. You can't. In America, the providers have banded together on this one and locked-out such functionality. And with a free market fundamentalist for a president, for Americans this is unlikely to change via regulatory pressures from the communications commission.

    2. Re:Change your phone Carrier by Macka · · Score: 1


      I don't understand. So you're saying that through out the whole of America, it's not possible to use Bluetooth to connect to your phone, for anything? And it doesn't matter what carrier you choose or what phone model due to the carriers rigging the market?

      That's astonishing! In Europe that would be considered as gross abuse of power. The communications watchdogs have some teeth to tackle this sort of thing, and possibly would get the monopolies commission involved. It would be stopped, which is probably why its never been attempted here.

    3. Re:Change your phone Carrier by revscat · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. So you're saying that through out the whole of America, it's not possible to use Bluetooth to connect to your phone, for anything? And it doesn't matter what carrier you choose or what phone model due to the carriers rigging the market?

      Well, kinda. You *can* connect Bluetooth phones up, but you have to pay for the privelege to do so by going through the carrier's network first. Completely unnecessary and completely ridiculous. But with libertarians running things, it probably won't change any time soon.

  58. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by Refrag · · Score: 1

    One can only hope.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  59. it will NOT be an iPhone by sagefire.org · · Score: 1
    Apple just WON'T do it.

    Apple's success is based on Apple controlling all aspects of its business. Can you imagine a company that doesn't allow clones of its computers allowing people to judge their newest/coolest gadget by the quality of signal that someone gets from some anonymous tower?!?

    Think about it...
    When the average user gets crappy reception during a phone call, do they curse the towers? No, they get mad at their phone (sometimes tossing it across the car or shutting it violently or something)!

    Apple will not make a product that is judged by the quality of something outside of Apple's control.

    If this is a phone, it will be a new set of features for Motorola, not an iPhone. Since Nextel uses Motorola and Sprint just bought Nextel, here is what I think will happen:

    Nextel/Sprint will offer 2 lines of phones:

    Powerbook line:
    Enhanced versions of what Nextel uses now
    (black, invulnerable, geeky, GPS, etc.)

    iBook line:
    iTMS (iTunes Music Service) enhanced versions of Sprint
    (Sprint "pin-drop" clarity with cool music downloads)

    Think of this more along the lines of the HP iPod, Apple is going to allow others to license their service. Apple will not make their own phone. If Apple is really doing anything with Motorola specifically on chips, it would be trying to get a lower heat/power-consumption G5 so Apple can get them into new Powerbooks.

  60. Excuse to double charge by mark2003 · · Score: 1

    Maybe (I hope) I am being really, really cycnical but I bet it won't be possible to either transfer tracks from your PC that you have ripped from a CD or (even worse) transfer tracks from your PC that you have already purchased via iTunes.

    I would put money on the only method of loading tracks onto the handset being downloading them directly to the handset.

    Nice way to get you to repurchase music and to lock you into your contract/handset (if you change network or handset you would loose your tunes).

    Maybe this will help the poor RIAA members get their profits even higher.

    1. Re:Excuse to double charge by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      You folks really need to read the article that is mentioned, before commenting on it.

      The article specifically says you WILL be able to connect the phone to your computer.

      This is a passage from the article.

      >>
      The companies said they plan to release a phone that will connect locally to computers running Microsoft's (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people ) Windows as well as Apple's Macintosh computers using a cable or a Bluetooth wireless connection.

      --
      - dj
  61. Wow! Just imagine the on-hold music possibities! by Zemplar · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Your current wait is expected to be two hours, twenty-five minutes...."

  62. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by fermion · · Score: 2, Informative
    It is a design decision. A single button mouse is fine if the UI is carefully designed to to use the simplest interface. With a Mac I never miss the second button as it is seldom the best way to execute a command. On a PC a second button is needded as the best way to access many features.

    One can also see this with keyboards. Many PC ship with 10 or more extra keys to execute specilized commands. While this may be useful for a small subset, it annoys me that the extra keys make the keyboard bigger than it has to be and it causes confusion. For instance, on my compaq laptop there is a row a ancillary buttons across the top. The most important button, the start up button, is just one these buttons, barely differentiated. Everytime I want to turn on the machine I must look for the button. Time wasted because someone wanted to look technologically advanced by including lots of buttons.

    The phone I want from apple has the structure of iPod mini, but much smaller. No keyboard, no speaker, no mic. Bluetooth to a headset. Scrollwheel selects person to call. Sync to adress book and datebook. If the networks would get full caller ID, like the bells, numbers could be stored with names. In fact I have often wondered how hard it would be add phone capability to the mini, and, of course, bluetooth.

    The keyboard on a phone is useful for texting, but a popup keyboard and the scrollwheel could be just as useful, expecially with predictive technology and a phrase bank. I will never buy a phone in which the data cannot be gathered from my laptop. The current cellphone is evolved from 70's technology. It is time for something different.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  63. Exactly! by SteveM · · Score: 1

    Apple's success is based on Apple controlling all aspects of its business. Can you imagine a company that doesn't allow clones of its computers allowing people to judge their newest/coolest gadget by the quality of signal that someone gets from some anonymous tower?!?

    Just like Apple not supporting that internet thingy! Imagine having your customers judge their new computer based on the crappy service they get from Comcast.

    Or like how you can't use third party software on your Macs. Imagine the user experience being ruined by some random app causing kernal panics!

    [/sarcasm]

    SteveM

  64. competition:aldipod by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    In germany and benelux, the discount chain aldi is releasing the "AldiPod" . I'm not much of music-man, but a phone with the design-talent of the ipod, my god, the drool is shorting my keyboard!

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  65. No by spotteddog · · Score: 1

    I don't want my cell phone to:
    Be a pda; play music,games, 3 billion different, ring tones,take pictures, record video, show tv shows, or any of the other things they keep cramming in.

    I want a cell phone that works well as a PHONE, doesn't drop calls, and doesn't have to be "rebooted" because of a crappy OS trying to do everything but what a telecommunications unit should do. It should make and recieve calls - and maybe, just maybe store a few frequently called numbers.

    IF, AND ONLY IF THEY GET THE BASIC PHONE FUNCTION ROCK SOLID THEN THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO ADD "FEATURES." I would much rather see them invest in makeing the technology more reliable than cramming new "features" into the device.

    --
    . there used to be a sig here.....
    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how many people bitch about just wanting their phones to work. What kind of shitty ass service do you have? My Cingular/AttWireless system works great for me in seattle. My T68i from SonyEricsson with camera, bluetooth and syncing with my apple stuff works great. An apple phone? Yeah I would buy it because I would expect it to be one notch better than the gret setup that I already have. Enchanced by using some great video codecs, itunes integration, etc.

      And to all of you ranting about just wanting a phone. Just get one! There are tons of low end basic phones out there. AND THEY ARE FREE WITH SIGNUP!

      This is the same old shit. Apple makes something cool and nobody at slashdot thinks it will be a success. Bottom line, the slashdot community is the last place i look to for feedback or opinion on anything cutting edge in the electronics market. Talking code, web dev, and tech resources, sure i look to slashdot.

      I wager that very few of us posting here has anything to do with designing, promoting and marketing great things like the iPod, etc. Those who do or strive to read these posts, laugh to themselves and say "wait til they see this and then we'll see what they are posting about when its a handsdown success."

    2. Re:No by bonezed · · Score: 1

      well i do want all those things

      I want the ultimate all in one device

      nothing wrong with current phone, but sif i wanna carry 5 devices when i could have just 1

      --
      ---- Put Sig here:
  66. I was right! sorta by objekt · · Score: 1
    In this thread I predicted it all

    Just didn't know that it was Apple who would do this.

    And that it would be this soon.

    Guess I win the bet. :-)

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  67. Well, check this out: by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://treomac.com/v-web/portal/cms/modules.php?na me=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=32

    I can throw a little more gas onto the Apple phone rumors. I was on a train this weekend, watching an episode of the Simpsons on my Treo600. The gentleman sitting across from me asked me how I liked the phone. I told him I loved it and we began a tech conversation. He mentioned that he worked for Motorola. I told him I was a Macintosh consultant, and then he dropped the bomb! "I've got a scoop for you", he teased.

    Apparently some of his associates had been telling him earlier in the week about an Apple branded phone that had been circulating around the office at Motorola. The phone had Motorola components, but most certainly had Apple brandings on it. He said that he did not have a chance to handle the phone, but that his direct supervisor did. The phone was "sleek and sexy" in her words. He mentioned that there was talk amongst the people who had seen it that itunes and iphoto would factor into this device somehow. They also said that the phone had a slot on the top (media slot?) as well as what looked to be a usb 2.0 port on the bottom.

    All very interesting. He gave me his card, so I'll be sure to press him for more details in the coming weeks.

    Stay Tuned!
    _________________
    Tony Ricciardi
    Administrator
    TreoMac.com


    Also, from another source:

    It's basically the successor to the Motorola E398, but with iTunes, and extensive Apple influence and iPod integration. I haven't seen it yet, but my info is direct from Moto top people.

    The current Motorola E398 was a tri-band GSM bar form factor phone, with a large screen, TransFlash slot, Bluetooth, camera, media player, speakerphone, and FM tuner. And since this offering is GSM, and Steve Jobs has twice trotted out Cingular CEO Stephen Carter at Macworld keynotes, and given other carriers' resistance to the idea of iTunes on a phone (for reasons of either not wanting to provide bandwidth for such a service at a reasonable cost, OR being opposed to having full computer/device connectivity via Bluetooth bypassing their networks), it would appear that Cingular/AT&T might be a good candidate to carry such a device.

    And for all those who think that Motorola phones suck OR are only basing your opinion on NEXTEL phones, trust me: they've gotten a LOT better, and actually have some excellent offerings (e.g., RAZR V3 and v710, Verizon crippling aside).

    1. Re:Well, check this out: by suyashs · · Score: 1

      Haha, how could someone recognize a USB 2.0 slot from a USB 1.1 slot? I don't doubt this at all (in fact it's the most credible that this is what Apple sued about (the leak)...We'll probably find out at Macworld...

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
  68. Move purchased tunes to PC? by chiph · · Score: 1

    A cell phone is a pretty limited device -- maybe 256mb ram. Will there be a way to transfer my purchased music to my PC?

    Also - will I be able to transfer AAC music that I purchased in the past from iTunes to my phone? It'd be nice to not have to carry a phone *and* an iPod to work.

    And lastly -- what about battery life?

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Move purchased tunes to PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a employee of a major cell phone manufacturer, I can assure you that almost NO mobiles on the market today have 256MB of RAM. RAM is expensive, and so you use as little as you possibly can. The cost difference between a 64MB RAM and a 256MB RAM can be $5-$10 dollars. If we make 1,000,000 phones and we wasted $10 on RAM we didn't need on each one, we just lost $10 million dollars. We spend weeks of engineering time to save pennies on the final bill of materials. When you talk large quantities, it just makes sense.

  69. Lot of components already there with Symbian ... by for_usenet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to admit I'm a bit curious about all the effort and publicity surrounding this, but I guess with Apple and Motorola being former bedroom buddies and with iTunes and Apple as hot as they are right now, anything involving either would make news.

    Most of Apple's functions (Bluetooth, MP3, AAC, 3GPP, contact synchroniztion) already work with Nokia's Symbian platform right now, except for iTunes' DRM - which, admittedly, is the show-stopper. But why would you not also try to partner with, or license your stuff to, another company who has done much of the grunt work already ?

  70. Samsung Uproar by onthefenceman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IIRC the Samsung Uproar was the first phone to come out with mp3 playback capability. For the technology available at the time (2001) it was a great device - 64MB flash player with a decent phone.

    One of the best features of that phone was completely unintentional - since it had stereo headphones for both phone and mp3 player usage you could have two people talk on the phone at the same time without having to use a speakerphone by giving each person one of the earpieces.

    --
    Have you seen my stapler?
  71. This would be great! by dep01 · · Score: 1

    I love the idea of mp3 players merging with cell phones. If you think about it, it's a very natural merge. And, ideally, MP3 integration would force the production of more comfortable handsfree headsets, and perhaps one day, a headset so seamless comfortable you would never have to take it off.

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  72. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why will he be fired? Everyone already knows there is something going on at Apple+Motorola. Jobs himself announced that iTunes would be included in Motorola cellphone. If Jobs going to fire anyone over this music-on-cellphone rumors, he has to start with himself.

    1. Re:Why? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      Because Apple's business model revolves around producing hit products (a lot like Jobs other business). A big part of making a product a "big hit" rather than "just another product" is how it's initial launch is managed. Jobs method is surprise... a big announcement of a major new cool product THAT NO ONE EXPECTED introduced with the understated trademark phrase "Oh, just one more thing..." A leak ruins the surprise (or even turns it into a negative if the real product doesn't live up to the leaked details). It damages the enthusiasm and buzz around a new product that Apple needs to create in order to turn a nice product into "the cool new thing" everybody is talking about and just HAS to have.

      Contractors have been sued (in 2002), employees have lost their jobs (a webmaster in 2003), and relationships with major vendors have been seriously damaged (ATI in 2000) on account of leaks.

      Sacking a VP would be a big deal but it would be in character. Motorola announcing a Motorola branded phone that can play iTunes songs is not a leak and not about an Apple product. A leak about an Apple branded(!) phone *IS*.

      Then again this could be calculated misdirection to protect some other product and heighten the surprise. This is something Apple appears to have done before - prior to the launch of the iPod there were tons of rumors about all sorts of products, none of them MP3 players. I suspect that Jobs, like Churchill, believes the truth is so important it must be protected by a vanguard of lies.

  73. And the kitchen sink by alexo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > So many things are becoming an addition to the mobile phone, and different
    > groups teaming up to cover their core areas. Obviously Sony are placed fairly
    > well at the moment with their audio, imaging, comms and gaming devices.


    Personally, I think that most additions that are bolted on a cell phone result in a substandard product.

    Consider a phone + camera combo.

    On one hand, I want my phone to be small and light.
    On the other hand, I want my digicam to take quality pictures, which requires a decently sized photosites and good optics (with lots of lens elements).

    These requirements are at odds with each other.

    On the other hand, adding audio functions to a cell phone should be doable without exessively compromising quality.

    Is there a reasonably priced cell phone + AM/FM radio + MP3 player combo in existance?

  74. Can I trust Forbes credibility? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't this the same news organization that has such wonderful writers as Daniel Lyons, and publishes glowing articles about what a wonderful case SCO has? Wern't they buying SCO's story even as of August 2004?

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  75. Re:Lot of components already there with Symbian .. by willy_me · · Score: 1

    There is a big difference between making something work and making something usable. Motorola may have already implemented the technical end of things but it's the user interface that makes or breaks a product. And creating a good user interface is just as hard, if not harder then making it work technically.

  76. An Inevitable Venture by allwaysmusic · · Score: 1


    Well... it was inevitable. The venture between Apple and Motorola. Music was bound to be on cell phones eventually. We all new it was coming.

    But, Wohoo! I'm excited. Not necessarily for the iTunes compatible cell phone, but for the concept. Sooner or later, all cell phones will be MP3 players as well. It's like two in one. It's like a combo DVD and VHS player. It sounds wonderful. Music on the go with no extra devices...

    This new cell phone will definitely replace the iPod, despite what the executive said.

  77. Not a Phone, a Platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to see Jobs think big and transform the whole phone industry instead of a boring old phone even if it is styled nice. How bout this...
    ------------
    Apple sets up their own full-fledged telecommunications platform and buys the bandwidth wholesale (kind of like Virgin) from the current infrastructure the same way they but bandwidth for the iTunes music store and their site. Then...they do like they did with the iPod...
    1) Portable device (iPod)...iPhone...but it is not just cell, it includes WiFi and Bluetooth for VoIP and traditional landlines.
    2) Master App (iTunes)...iMessage...Syncs all addresses, etc. Ties into the internet for VoIP and to your land line through the modem port. Includes all the telephony functions like answering system etc.. Coordinates with iTunes and iPhoto.
    3) Web Services (iTuneMusicStore)...iMessageCenter...Manage your cell/VoIP accounts/plan. Buy ringtones and iPhone accessories, etc.
    ----------
    Apple controls the whole sheebang and transforms another staid, boring industry. Brings them all into the new millenium.
    Probably not possible but I could see Jobs having a lot of fun doing it. And think of the revenue stream.

  78. Note that I said voice recognition for dialing by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I agree that from the screen shot the phone looks very impractical.

    But if it could recognize spoken numbers to dial, then it would be much more practical - and my initial point about using the scroll wheel to traverse address books still stands. Nothing beats scrolling through a large list of items like the scroll wheel.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  79. No, But there will be Spinal Tap branded iPhone . by Anonymous+Poodle · · Score: 1

    With a #11 key.

  80. Ringtones Market 20 Times Larger Than Downloads by meehawl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The last analyst report I saw pointed out that the entire revenue from legal downloads amounted to 5% of the current revenue from mobile phone ringtones.

    If I was Apple I'd be selling ringtones on the ITMS.

    --

    Da Blog
  81. Another posters coment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, phone quality needs work. I had to get a imported phone from soney ericsson. Most of the things it does are nice. I'd like it better if had a square form factor. Oh well. Phone call quality has gone to crap for amongst other things what people think about microwave towers neer them. On the handset end it's definatly gone to crap as well. Case in point: my nokia 3650: Droped MANY times. Still works. Treo droped once. dead. Ericsson. Droped a few times. not a scratch.

  82. Wait just a minute... by Daytona89 · · Score: 1

    The companies said they plan to release a phone that will connect locally to computers unning Microsoft's Windows as well as Apple's Macintosh computers using a cable or a Bluetooth wireless connection.


    What about Redhat's Linux?

  83. Stupid idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will they realize we don't need a cell phone that does a bazillion things? We just need them to WORK. Give us a cell phone that doesn't drop calls!!!

  84. Re:No, But there will be Spinal Tap branded iPhone by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    Is it black like the U2 phone? How much more black could it be?

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  85. What is the missing puzzle piece? by ashooner · · Score: 1

    I have my Apple BT powerbook, I have Apple Ipod. Both designed for sleek and easy mobility. Whats missing? My connection! I want this to be an apple component that gets me onto the internet at the highest possible speed while on a cell network (rather than WiFi) . Perhaps it can autonomously download an album from iTMS without my laptop, for when I hear it on the radio, or see it in a store. but who knows...

    --
    They Are Night Zombies!! They Are Neighbors!! They Have Come Back from the Dead!! Ahhhh!
  86. not Anonymous by sweetaction · · Score: 1

    I posted the item above. it didnt attach my name to it.

  87. Agreed! The phone is NOT AN IPOD. by momus_radar · · Score: 1

    Making a phone that also works as an iPod would simply undermine regular iPod sales. If anything, my guess is that the Apple/Moto phone would have the typical integration with iSync, Address Book and add to it tight integration with .Mac (web-mail) & iChat AV. The possibilities with that would be amazing.

  88. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

    http://oldphones.com/

  89. Exactly! There are bigger goals here. by momus_radar · · Score: 1
    I think that Apple's interest in a phone is not only to deliver some kind of music service, but I'd look for some kind of iChat hooks as well - either simple texting or building to some kind of eventual videophone functionality. Quicktime in the phone is overkill for just music - there are bigger goals here.

    So far we seem to be the only ones thinking in the same direction.

  90. Re:Stephen Carter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STEPHEN EFFING CARTER? The guy who got replaced in late 2002 and slinked back to SBC? You need to update your database, friend. Getting trotted out at Macworld keynotes was the highlight of his Cingular career. The guy was AWFUL.

  91. Re:Ringtones: What if iTunes song WAS your rington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an earlier poster pointed out - if it was possible to use ACTUAL songs as ringtones instead of those ANNOYING whining tones I have to choose from - wow! I would PAY $0.99 for my own choice of a song as a ringtone! I bet the Apple/Mot phone WILL have this feature.
    So can we say - Ringtone download sites - get ready for Apple to take over THAT market too!

    Hmmm - my favorite Bhangra song as my ringtone! or Clapton or Basie or ...Wow!

    AM

  92. Screw iTunes - I want Address Book and iCal Phone by aflat362 · · Score: 1
    Who cares about a phone that plays iTunes? That's what your iPod is for. I want my Cell phone to be able to synchronize my phone book with Apple's Address book. Its such a pain to enter all of my contacts manually into the phone.

    And if they do address book they might as well throw iCal synchronization in there too so I can see my calendar on my phone. Though the Address Book Synch would be more useful.

    And - of course - the interface to my PowerBook should be Bluetooth.

    --

    Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

  93. I'm guessing it's a tactical 'leak' by decimal0 · · Score: 1
    It could be intended to blunt the christmas sales of cellphones that might dampen their Janurary release. I myself was thinking of dumping my old Sprint phone, but I'm definitely going to hold off and see what Apple announces.

    Although I have to say I've always wondered why Apple is so bad at missing the christmas and back-to-school seasons with their product announcements. But I guess it's working for them, since they never seem to make enough units anyway (except maybe for G4 Cubes...)

  94. Nice to see you again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep up the good work. Every time I look at my friends list I fall victim to your ploy! Oh no! I have to remember to breathe again! *breathes*

  95. Re:Screw iTunes - I want Address Book and iCal Pho by akiro · · Score: 1

    So why dont you buy one then: http://www.apple.com/isync/devices.html My last 3 cellphones have talked happily with my Mac. Syncing, sending files, sending sms with the computer, using it as a modem etc "just works"..

  96. Re:Ringtones: What if iTunes song WAS your rington by rufo · · Score: 1

    It's already happening, dammit - I have a roommate whose phone blares some annoying-ass punk rock song in mono badness. He's with Cingular, I believe.

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  97. Re:Macintosh 1 button mouse...now the 1 button pho by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

    Nokia seem to be working with Apple on the 7280:

    from the site you linked to:

    "Nokia Collector supports synchronization with Apple for photos, audio files, and video clips"

  98. great.. by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't rude and anti-social enough for all you whippersnappers to talk loud on your cell phone in public spaces, now people will have to talk even louder over all that damn hippie music....

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  99. Re:Screw iTunes - I want Address Book and iCal Pho by aflat362 · · Score: 1
    Which ones did you use? any favorites / recommendations? Did they use Bluetooth or USB?

    Thanks!

    --

    Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

  100. Re:No, But there will be Spinal Tap branded iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None.

    None more black.

  101. Audiovox CMP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the Audiovox CMP3 was the first MP3 player/phone.

    http://www.audiovox.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servle t/ ProductDisplay?catalogId=10001&storeId=10001&produ ctId=689911&langId=-1

    Be glad you never had one.