Slashdot Mirror


Google's 20-Year Usenet Timeline

theRG writes "Google just released its 20-Year Usenet Timeline. Among the highlights: First Mac rumor, first 'me too' post, Tim Berners-Lee's announcement of the Web, and Linus' announcement of Linux."

412 comments

  1. Alas they didn't get the first by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    first post! I probably failed it

    1. Re:Alas they didn't get the first by jdunn14 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Me too!!!

    2. Re:Alas they didn't get the first by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down. He said first post!!

    3. Re:Alas they didn't get the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me too!

    4. Re:Alas they didn't get the first by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      If you send a copy of that post to the 10 names following, then add your name to the list, within 30 days you will then receive 10,000,000 emails in return.

      1. abuse@localhost

      2. billgates@micro$oft.com

      3. cowboyneil@slashdot.org

      4. ...

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    5. Re:Alas they didn't get the first by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Where's the first post requesting to see Sandra Bullock's feet?

      Or the first post requesting what is DiVx and how do I get it?

      Or the first post complaining that you, really now, should not be posting binaries on Usenet.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. Huh? by marktaw.com · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive" Where did we get the word "just" ????

    1. Re:Huh? by RichDiesal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive" Where did we get the word "just" ????

      20-year Usenet Archive and 20-year Usenet Timeline are different things.

    2. Re:Huh? by kaden · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this timeline actually is from 2001.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. Perhaps, if you read correctly, you'd notice that the timeline says "11 Dec 2001: Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive", and the post says "just released its 20-year Usenet Timeline".

      ie. They just now released the timeline to the (old) archive.

      Get it now?

    4. Re:Huh? by 787style · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that Google Posts a link to the timeline on the usenet back in 2001. It's old news. Nothing to see here, move along.
      http://groups-beta.google.com/group/google.public. support.general/msg/d88f36fb3e2c0aac

    5. Re:Huh? by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      The HTTP request says that the page was not modified since dated September 23, 2004.
      But if you did a search on /. archive, you had found the old post dated December 11, 2001 that also gives a date to the timeline.

      Of couse you should had suspected the the timeline is old, because some interesting things happened on Usenet since 2001.

      Get it now?

  3. Linus by debilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    From Linus' announcement:

    I can (well, almost) hear you asking yourselves "why?". Hurd will be out in a year (or two, or next month, who knows), and I've already got minix.

    The Hurd. Beautiful.

    1. Re:Linus by SenorMooCow · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like this quote from Linus:
      If you write programs for linux today, you shouldn't have too many surprises when you just recompile them for Hurd in the 21st century.

      As if anyone would want to compile something for Hurd in the 21st century :)

      --
      I run a Debian/Kernel/Knoppix Mirror: (http|ftp|rsync)://debian.ams.sunysb.edu/
      apt-get @ > 5MBps == teh win!
    2. Re:Linus by voisine · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Be thankful you are not my student. You would not
      get a high grade for such a design :-)" - Andy Tanenbaum to Linus, Jan 30 '92

    3. Re:Linus by MemoryDragon · · Score: 0

      Which if you follow the original posting is quite right. a) the original 0.x kernel was not very well designed and programmed b) a microkernel approach still is the better approach

    4. Re:Linus by underYOU · · Score: 1

      you have to love the power hungry teachers who try to stop ingenuity...

      --
      ***This sig has been detected as spyware by Microsoft Anti-Spyware*** Threat risk: HIGH
    5. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      b) a microkernel approach still is the better approach

      Better in what way? Theoretically better, I guess, maybe. But in the real world, monolithic kernels - as used in MacOS X, Linux, *BSD, and all versions of Windows - are here, now, and working fine, while microkernels have all without exception either fizzled out, become vaporware, or ended up morphing into monolithic kernels (as with OSX and Windows NT) as soon as people try to implement a real-world OS on top of them.

    6. Re:Linus by BoneFlower · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microkernels still have a performance disadvantage and some greater complexity in designing. They certainly have advantages, but they aren't clearly superior on the whole.

      The best approach for the real world seems to be a hybrid design, either adding monolithic elements to a micokernel design, such as in OSX and NT, or adding some microkernel concepts to a monolithic kernel, such as the module system added to Linux. Either approach will have some of the key benefits of a microkernel design without sacrificing much, if any, of the performance of a monolithic kernel.

    7. Re:Linus by sysadmn · · Score: 1
      you just recompile them for Hurd in the 21st century.
      Well, they've got 95 years to finish it. Can't wait for the port of Duke Nukem to it.
      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    8. Re:Linus by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Not really MacOSX uses a Mac Microkernel which has a BSD personality on top of it and some drivers on top of bsd and some on top of Mach. WindowsNT started as a plain Microkernel but in later incarnations some of the multimedia stuff was moved to the kernel layer (but not into the kernel) to reduce latency times (and decreased stability)

    9. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tanenbaum is just jealous that his name isn't a household one despite his fastidious nature. Not to say he hasn't done anything, but fame is fickle and Linus has his own peculiar variety.

  4. The irony of the Sudan/US+Iraq connection... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    given that both the US government and the UN list the Sudanese government as one of the worlds 2 or 3 worst human rights violators, on a par with Iraq's (See, for example, the New York Times, Mar 11 1993

    It's incredibly amazing how much insight the poster of the first "Osama bin Laden" usenet post must have had back in 1993. In 2005, among the top stories of the year: USA+Iraq, Tsunami, the Sudan Crisis and the lack of USA involvement.

    Sigh...

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:The irony of the Sudan/US+Iraq connection... by Pastis · · Score: 1

      I keep searching, but nowhere do I see the word laden on that post. Nor in that thread neither...

    2. Re:The irony of the Sudan/US+Iraq connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 10 days in and we already have the top stories of the year? Well, at least I can rest assured that nothing major is really gonna happen for a while.

    3. Re:The irony of the Sudan/US+Iraq connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is misleading. The poster talks about the WTC bombing of 1993, which Osama was not responsible for and had no direct involvement (according to 9/11 Commission Report). The idea that Osama tried to take down the WTC twice is a myth. He tried once and unfortunately suceeded. The first attempt by Ramzi Yousef and company inspired Khallid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) who at that time was not working for Osama. Eventually KSM would join Al Qaeda and present his plan to Osama. I'd go on, but its all in the 9/11 Report.

  5. Oddly familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You feel like you've been here before." --More--

  6. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I enjoyed the Linux announcement, classic.

  7. I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I've seen this before... i know I have... I tought slashdot pointed me to it... must have been wrong...

  8. This has been around for a while... by kaden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Heh, this was reported on Slashdot over ago...

    1. Re:This has been around for a while... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Don't know who marked you offtopic, but you're perfectly right, this is VERY old.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    2. Re:This has been around for a while... by iocat · · Score: 1
      Yeah, for probably the second or third time, since it went up in 2001...

      ----- 11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    3. Re:This has been around for a while... by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Informative

      And even then, it was old news.

      The last item on the list behind the link:

      11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive

      Which makes this story not only a dupe, but 3 years old as well...

      If we keep this up we'll start seeing dupe John Katz posts any time now.

    4. Re:This has been around for a while... by darc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shh, this is our chance to karma up and reuse the jokes from the old thread! Dammit, now you've gone and spoiled it.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    5. Re:This has been around for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, this was reported on Slashdot over ago...

      No, the archive itself was reported by slashdot years ago, this post is regarding the TIMELINE of said 20 year archive.

    6. Re:This has been around for a while... by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think the difference is that the old article mentioned that google news has 20 years of data, but this one links to a timeline page. Related, closely, but still different.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    7. Re:This has been around for a while... by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think the difference is that the old article mentioned that google news has 20 years of data, but this one links to a timeline page. Related, closely, but still different.

      No, the timeline featured in today's dupe was also linked in the old post. Same page: http://www.google.com/googlegroups/archive_announc e_20.html both times.

    8. Re:This has been around for a while... by 2A · · Score: 0

      yeah, in fact, on the timeline, it even shows the first time the story was posted on slashdot!

    9. Re:This has been around for a while... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Google groups used to be called Deja News ... how apt.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:This has been around for a while... by DGregory · · Score: 1

      If it's 3 years old, shouldn't the article be titled Google has 23 years of Usenet postings?

    11. Re:This has been around for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This raises an interesting question; the article you linked to is from December 2001, yet the only indication of the year that I see on the article page is in the friggin' URL - am I missing something here, or is putting the date as simply 'December 11' completely useless?

  9. To Ron at Rutgers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expect a call from Apple Legal. Steve doesn't like having his surprises ruined.

  10. Hurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hurd will be out in a year or two" - Linus

    It cracks me up every time.

    1. Re:Hurd by Deusy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps it would have been if Linus and Linux hadn't shown up?

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    2. Re:Hurd by endx7 · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't have been out of options.

      After all, the hurd has been around in a slightly working state for a while now. You just can't trust on it for reliability or performance or anything else...yet. But, it does run.

      And on a more useful note, there are the BSDs (FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, etc).

      So, no, it's not like you would have had nothing to use or anything. :P

    3. Re:Hurd by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you just misread that statement. It actually says that Hurd will not be "in", but "out" in a year or two. And indeed, quite soon Linux was in, and the Hurd was out.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  11. Justice Must Be Done... by stevens · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone hunt down and kill that "Me too" guy with AOL CDs.

    1. Re:Justice Must Be Done... by xanderwilson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Notice that there's a "reply" option at the end of each message. What do you suppose the chances are of someone making the world's longest post-bump? I don't have the audacity myself to metoo a metoo post.

      Alex.

    2. Re:Justice Must Be Done... by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the first "Me Too" predates the Great Renaming. There is no such newsgroup as net.micro.pc anymore.

      You could bump Announcement of UUNET, but there is much less romantic allure to that.;)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  12. Heh by slashdime · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Heh" -Linus Torvalds 05 Oct 1991

    I love him for that..

    1. Re:Heh by tindur · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Heh" is perfect swedish (at least in Finland).

  13. My prediction for the near future. by Chatmag · · Score: 1

    Reference the last story about predictions.

    Google drops Usenet.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:My prediction for the near future. by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Google drops Usenet.
      Google paid good money for Usenet. (Or, more specifically, for the archive from Dejanews.)

      Granted, they seem to be doing bad things with it (the groups-beta thing really kinda bites), but I don't see them ditching it -- it fits in very well with their key business (searching), and I doubt it costs them much money (compared to their web search, for example) to keep going.

      And it's useful -- when looking for answers to technical issues (like `I got *this* error. How do I fix it?', searching Usenet is often more useful than the web.

    2. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Chatmag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm basing that on several factors. Checking the Alexa rankings over the past few months, Google Groups have gone from about 7% of all Google users down to 1% as of a few moments ago. Granted, Alexa is not the most accurate measurement of a site, but it does give some indications as to overall popularity.

      Some of their own statistics show that most groups have low activity: Group-Society Activity High (167) Low (6712) Medium (137)

      All of the other groups show low activity as the largest numbers. They simply do not have the eyeballs hitting the groups.

      They do not show Adsense ads in groups, at least none that I've found. It's all paid for by ad revenue from other Google areas.

      The groups that are not moderated have degenerated into ad spam fests, driving off people interested in those groups topics.

      I think that when Alexa shows less than 1% of users, Google will decide it's no longer worth keeping.

      I do agree with you that Usenet can be useful for finding answers, I use a combination of Google search and Groups search. I still think Google will rethink Groups, either dumping it, or correcting the problems. (I'm leaning toward them dumping it).

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    3. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALEXA CONFIRMS IT!!! .... USENET IS DYING!

      Seriously, probably the last geninuely unique and useful content on Usenet is the Microsoft support groups* ... and MS now has their own web interface to them.

      * AFAICT, the once very useful Linux groups have migrated to web forums.

    4. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Most Linux groups are either in IRC or discussion forums.

      Linux discussion groups

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    5. Re:My prediction for the near future. by wheany · · Score: 1

      And it's useful -- when looking for answers to technical issues (like `I got *this* error. How do I fix it?', searching Usenet is often more useful than the web.

      I've found that nowdays you'll find the answer more often on a web discussion forum or a mailing list archive than on the usenet.

    6. Re:My prediction for the near future. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Google Groups have gone from about 7% of all Google users down to 1% as of a few moments ago.

      I used to routinely read and post via Google, but now the interface sucks so much that I've reverted to NNTP. I still use it's search of course, as there's no alternative for old posts. The new Groups interface is really annoying in many ways and many features don't work at all in my browser (Opera, an older version to be sure).

    7. Re:My prediction for the near future. by danielrose · · Score: 1

      seconded. the new groups interface is much worse than the old.

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    8. Re:My prediction for the near future. by pchan- · · Score: 1

      i'll third this. the new groups interface is painful to use. i don't mind ads, but the ui is crap.

      i use groups often (i've learned more from comp.lang.c than from any of my professors over the years). i know some google employee is reading this. please, please send an email to the usenet group and tell them to make the hurting stop.

    9. Re:My prediction for the near future. by secretsquirel · · Score: 0
      "Seriously, probably the last geninuely unique and useful content on Usenet is the Microsoft support groups* ... and MS now has their own web interface to them."

      It's still the spot for 0-day binaries. Any ISP that has a halfway decent news server is better than any p2p app out there.

    10. Re:My prediction for the near future. by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Checking the Alexa rankings over the past few months, Google Groups have gone from about 7% of all Google users down to 1% as of a few moments ago. Granted, Alexa is not the most accurate measurement of a site, but it does give some indications as to overall popularity.

      This could simply mean that people are becoming more aware about spyware and are removing alexa, or switching to Firefox or even a different OS.

    11. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Plutor · · Score: 1

      > Checking the Alexa rankings over the past few months, Google Groups have gone from about 7% of all Google users down to 1% as of a few moments ago.

      If we assume that this Forbes article is still approximately accurate, Google gets 60 million unique users per month. One percent of that is 600,000 users.

      How many percent do you think hit Froogle? Or Answers, or Catalogs? Using percent-of-total-hits as the sole deciding factor for whether to keep data or not is really not what I expect from Google.

    12. Re:My prediction for the near future. by m50d · · Score: 1

      The linux groups are still there. I for one will not be moving to a web forum, ever, since I don't believe in them. And if you drop into alt.os.linux and ask a question, I will try and answer it.

      --
      I am trolling
    13. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Erik+Piper · · Score: 1

      Me, too1111!

    14. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too!

    15. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me, too!!

    16. Re:My prediction for the near future. by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Most Linux groups are either in IRC or discussion forums.
      I'm not sure why you brought up Linux groups, but sure -- there are more non-Usenet Linux discussion groups than there are Usenet Linux discussion groups. (There's about 20 comp.os.linux.* groups, and probably thousands of other online Linux forums and discussion groups.)

      I'm also a regular on rec.models.rc.air -- one group, yet there's now dozens of other online discussion boards related to R/C planes now.

      But Usenet is useful.

      It goes back over 20 years, and I can search all of that thanks to google (and before that Dejanews.) The interface to Usenet (NNTP) is exactly as I want it, and doesn't change from group to group. I can do everything without a mouse. I can save articles easily, and I know that my posts won't be removed by some overzealous moderator. And they won't be lost just because some site forgot to make backups. I don't need to register on 15 different sites and keep track of all of that -- Usenet is Usenet.

      The clue level on the comp.* groups generally seems higher than that on the web forums, probably because most Usenet users are a bit more cluefull than your average `web' user.

      comp.* and rec.* do have some spam, but it's not that bad. Anybody who claims that Usenet is overrun with spam either 1) isn't looking outside of alt.*, 2) is reading a `dead' group (how much discussion of the Apple II is there today?) or 3) isn't reading Usenet at all. A bigger problem is off topic posts, where the regulars have no problems with discussing political issues (for examples) on their favorite groups. But even this isn't too bad.

      I imagine that web forums are now more popular than Usenet simply because they require less thought to use -- you don't need to find your NNTP server, for example. Having moderators who can clamp the spam down to _zero_ (except for the obligatory advertising, which is at least usually on-topic) is also a good thing, and people do like their cutesy blinking avatar icons.

      But maybe google IS trying to kill Usenet. They're certainly trying to make it look like a web forum -- they're adding the worst features of them to their groups stuff, when it all worked very well before. They're hiding email addresses, confusing people all over Usenet, especially those who think that groups.google.com IS Usenet. Presumably this is done to stop spam, but what if I want to email somebody? Blech.

    17. Re:My prediction for the near future. by lisany · · Score: 1

      I for one will not be moving to a web forum, ever, since I don't believe in them.

      Don't look now but you're posting on a web forum

    18. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Hello Dougmc, sorry for the delay in responding. I'd imagine you have this on reply notify, and should see this.

      There was a post from an "AC", mentioning Linux discussions, so I posted the link to the Linux listings.

      I subscribe to several Internet Service Provider email lists and forums, and the general tone the past few years is that ISP's are not gung ho for Usenet anymore. So I'm partially basing my thoughts on several other unrelated pieces of information, not just the sorry state of affairs in Google Groups. When ISP's sign up new clients, for the most part they are pushing discussion/chat and IM, rather than Usenet.

      I tend to think of what the casual Internet user is doing online, rather than those that have been around a while. The new users are not familiar with Usenet. As you said, they don't know how to configure NNTP. (listening to "Internet Help Desk" pretty much sums up the new user).

      Thanks again, and apologies for not answering sooner, it's been pretty hectic the past few days around here. Pete

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  14. Feh! by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not worth a cracker 'cause it doesn't have my first Usenet post, back in December '87.

    1. Re:Feh! by nick-less · · Score: 1

      It's not worth a cracker 'cause it doesn't have my first Usenet post, back in December '87.

      well, it doesn't have my first usenet post either, but the first of my posts available contained the subject: "2nd test".

    2. Re:Feh! by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Obviously your first test post failed horribly and never made it to Usenet.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  15. Bob! by N4DMX · · Score: 1

    May 1983 - All hail Bob!! :-) I didn't know the church of the subgenius went back that far, though.. very interesting stuff.

    --
    42
    1. Re:Bob! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JESUS BUILT MY HOTROD!

    2. Re:Bob! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Jerry Lee Lewis was the Devil.

  16. Usenet is now dead without an exclusive big news by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    or I don't want to post there to offer a spam target

  17. Such a nice young man by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm also interested in hearing from anybody who has written any of the
    utilities/library functions for minix. If your efforts are freely
    distributable (under copyright or even public domain), I'd like to hear
    from you, so I can add them to the system. I'm using Earl Chews estdio
    right now (thanks for a nice and working system Earl), and similar works
    will be very wellcome. Your (C)'s will of course be left intact. Drop me
    a line if you are willing to let me use your code.

    It's no accident that Linux was such an pleasant project to hack on way back when, Linus is just such a humble and polite person. He still is today. What ever happened to that? These days you're lucky to get a reply to an email when offering to contribute code to an open source project, let alone someone actually thanking you for going to the effort of making something for others to enjoy.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Such a nice young man by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      Linus is just such a humble and polite person.

      Yeah, polite especially what he said about those nice SCO people.

      ;)

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:Such a nice young man by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Insightful
      These days you're lucky to get a reply to an email when offering to contribute code to an open source project, let alone someone actually thanking you for going to the effort of making something for others to enjoy.
      You do still get nice responses those but at a guess I'd think people are more likely to face email overload today. It's not that people themselves are rude as such, they just get more email than they can cope with satisfactorally.

      A good friend of mine works on Linux and it's scary watching him open his mailbox. We're best mates and I don't often get timely responses to emails I send him!

      His email is at least fairly focused. I imagine people who work on things that are more user facing (GNOME, KDE etc) must get a whole lot of stuff coming their way...
      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    3. Re:Such a nice young man by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It's no accident that Linux was such an pleasant project to hack on way back when, Linus is just such a humble and polite person.
      Tell me, were you being ironic? :-) I mean, for fuck's sake, Linus was involved in the only flamefest we were "taught" about in a CS course!
      These days you're lucky to get a reply to an email when offering to contribute code to an open source project, let alone someone actually thanking you for going to the effort of making something for others to enjoy.
      Hate adding to a Good Ol' Times meme, but those USENET oldies sure had a lot of time back then; I mean, look at this fascinating posting from 1993. The guy not only demolishes the OP's points, but also deconstructs his writing style as well! You really don't get that sort of stuff these days in discussion fora, USENET or not, so it's probably more to do with netiquette back then, and less to do with Linus himself. (Which of course, is not to say he's not a great guy).
    4. Re:Such a nice young man by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      Is it meek or deferential to name the entire kernel after himself? Even he thought that would tag him as an egomaniac. Genuinely thankful for others contributions, sure, but I would not say humble.

    5. Re:Such a nice young man by BJH · · Score: 1

      Please note that it was not Linus who named it Linux... I believe the name that Linus chose was "Freax".

    6. Re:Such a nice young man by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Informative

      He did not do that himself. The administrator of the FTP server he used has chosen that name.

    7. Re:Such a nice young man by CountBrass · · Score: 0
      Whilst accurate it's kind of misleading. Here's the full story: linux naming. He obviously chose to stick with that name: just because the directory was called Linux didn't force him to name the Kernel Linux.

      Personally I think his biggest arrogance is not giving GNU their due credit. .PPolite: sure. Modest and humble: hardly.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    8. Re:Such a nice young man by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I really have to reply to this. Linus was humble in that he didn't claim his project was the greatest most important achievement in the history of man-kind and that you simply MUST contribute to his project otherwise you're a toad. Oh, and when people said "gee, I've got this bit of code I threw together last week do you want it?" he said yes and thanked them for their contribution.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:Such a nice young man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those darned kids these days...Have no respect.

    10. Re:Such a nice young man by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      Linus marks his posts X-No-Archive these days to prevent them being included in the Usenet archive.

      Linus came in on this thread and joined in the discussion, unfortunately his side of things isn't there you have to look in the plan9 version of the archive here

      an example of Linus' humble prose (I'm not saying any of this is the wrong thing to say but some of it is not very as humble as you suggest):

      (3) Implementation sucks. Irix and Plan-9 both get it wrong, and they
      _pay_ for it. Heavily. The Linux code is just better. ...

      And the plan-9/irix thing isn't. It's an abomination. ...

      You don't like it. Fine. I don't care. You're myopic, and have an agenda
      to push, so you want to tell others that "you can't do that, it's against
      my agenda". ...

      Welcome to the real world, Neo.

      Stop playing around with those examples your professors showed you. They
      had no relevance. ...

      I can speak the newspeak as well as anybody else.

      But when I speak it, I realize when I'm full of shit. ...

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    11. Re:Such a nice young man by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Maybe you missed the part of the discussion where we said we were talking about 1992.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    12. Re:Such a nice young man by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Maybe you missed the part of the discussion where we said we were talking about 1992.

      Maybe you have problems when there are so many of those pesky word things in the way. Here, let me help :

      "Linus is just such a humble and polite person. He still is today."

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    13. Re:Such a nice young man by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      fair enough :)

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    14. Re:Such a nice young man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes he is humble at times, but he puts on the "I'm right, you're wrong" bravado when it's useful to him. However, he does it playfully enough that he doesn't come across as an ass. He does a pretty good job of telling people what they need to hear. In interviews, he only plays the humility card since he knows that it makes him harder to portray negatively.

      The man isn't perfect. He can be a bit stubborn. He's made some questionable decisions, but none of them have been critical. However, even when you consider his faults, he's a genuinely likeable guy and he's managed not to alienate anyone. He's a figure that people can rally behind.

      Linus isn't some sort of god, but he is an interesting person.

    15. Re:Such a nice young man by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Bleh! Luckily they still have GooGroo Classic in American Samoa.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    16. Re:Such a nice young man by Gumshoe · · Score: 2, Informative
      From page 84 of "Just For Fun", by Linus Torvalds and David Diamond.
      With the shell working, I started testing it's builtin progams. Then I compiled enough new programs to actually do something. I was compiling everything in Minix, but I moved the shell over to a special partition for the new operating system. Privately I called it Linux.

      Honest: I didn't want to ever release it under the name Linux because it was too egotistical. What was the name I reserved for any eventual release? Freax.
      And then from page 88 of the same book.
      [...] Ari Lemke, who insured that it made its way to the ftp site, hated the name Freax. He preferred the other working name I was using -- Linux -- and named my posting: pub/OS/Linux.
      So while it may be true to say that Linus didn't want to release the kernel under the name Linux. Through his own admission in his own book, Linus came up with the name Linux himself.
    17. Re:Such a nice young man by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he should have named it jbnonux-555068 ?

    18. Re:Such a nice young man by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      Linus was humble in that he didn't claim his project was the greatest most important achievement in the history of man-kind and that you simply MUST contribute to his project otherwise you're a toad.

      Who claimed he said that? Has anyone said this about their work?

      Most people don't go around saying that and most people are not called humble. I think you're exaggerating to make a false claim.

    19. Re:Such a nice young man by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

      Is this the first instance of someone misuing loose where lose should go? DAMN THIS PISSES ME OFF! Damn Loosers!! Lurn to speel!

  18. This is true... by br00tus · · Score: 1

    if you mean "just released" in the Slashdot way, e.g. over three years ago.

    1. Re:This is true... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      The difference is that you when you click on the links now you see their incredibly sucky new interface.

  19. Broken link by AnuradhaRatnaweera · · Score: 2, Informative

    The link "Stallman's announcement of GNU" is broken. It reports that "there is no group named net.usoft.".

    1. Re:Broken link by ronabop · · Score: 1

      It's not really a broken link. A complete, working, version of the link is due out any day now, they're just in the final stages of debugging it.

    2. Re:Broken link by piquadratCH · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can find it here

  20. Map of usenet by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm particularly fond of their
    current map of usenet done with ascii art.

    I'll give $5.00 to the first person to provide an updated ascii art usenet map.

    1. Re:Map of usenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link? Sorry, I can't see the map you're talking about.

      TIA

    2. Re:Map of usenet by agildehaus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Porn
      |
      |----Usenet----Internet----Me
      |
      Warez

    3. Re:Map of usenet by arose · · Score: 1

      You forgot "flamwar"... idiot. ;-)

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:Map of usenet by arose · · Score: 1

      Bad spelling is an integral part of a good flamewar... yeah, that's it...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:Map of usenet by duffster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try the copy on UK Google Groups, which looks much better. Hopefully Google won't alter the link automatically (they now change google.com to google.co.uk in the UK).

      So, about that $5.00... ;-)

    6. Re:Map of usenet by smacktits · · Score: 1

      I noticed thhat a few weeks ago. Why do they do that? I mean, not that it makes any difference to my search results. It's just irritating. To the best of my knowledge they don't do this to any other country.

    7. Re:Map of usenet by duffster · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I've found that if you go to http://www.google.com/webhp instead, it doesn't seem to transfer you to google.co.uk. Of course that's a longer link to type, though :-)

      I imagine they rewrite the link for people that hadn't heard you can limit a search to UK pages. Presumably it only works if your hostname ends with .co.uk, or some domain name that they know is from the UK.

    8. Re:Map of usenet by m50d · · Score: 1

      It's not just the domain name. A reverse lookup on me gives a .com, and I still get directed to google.co.uk.

      --
      I am trolling
    9. Re:Map of usenet by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      Yes they do. I am a canadian and when I goto http://www.google.com. It takes me to http://www.google.ca.

      I never notice it. The web is the web no matter what "google" you search from. (Unless of course you set it to search in that country.

    10. Re:Map of usenet by Patik · · Score: 1
      Try the copy on UK Google Groups, which looks much better. Hopefully Google won't alter the link automatically (they now change google.com to google.co.uk in the UK).
      How do you know it looks better if you can't see the .com version>
    11. Re:Map of usenet by duffster · · Score: 1

      They only rewrite http://www.google.com/, and not http://www.google.com/googlegroups nor http://groups-beta.google.com , so I can see the munged version the parent poster mentioned.

      I've realised since my earlier post that you can in fact view the correctly formatted version in the new google groups anyway, by clicking on "show options" followed by "Show original". They do still hide parts of email addresses in this mode, however.

  21. Autocad's Acquisition of Xanadu Hypertext by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Although it never made it to market, it's probably worth noting the first mention of "Autodesk's acquisition of the Xanadu hypertext system" as one of the biggest "might have beens".

    PS: There unfortunately was no mention anywhere in Google's archive of Mark Miller's right-shift-one of the Xanadu vocabulary, which turned Project Xanadu into Project Babel.

  22. You know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know there's some guy named Phil Nelson in a bar somewhere with a printout of Torvalds' usenet post, and he's like "yeah baby, he's talking about ME!"

    1. Re:You know.. by PseudoSchizo · · Score: 0
      Hey, come on now, some chicks dig that. Yeah, some chicks really dig effort, man.

      Ben 'Jammin

      --
      Proud Rememberer of the BBS Days.
  23. Just Released???? by Jack+Porter · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's been over 3 years since this page went up!

    From the linked page:

    11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive

    1. Re:Just Released???? by PDA_Monkey · · Score: 1

      Indeed... In fact it was on slashdot the day it went up. Of course, this *IS* slashdot, so we can't actually expect them to think to look into that.

      The linked cartoon on the original post is funny, too.

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/11/0727 21 8

      --
      Hallo, My name is Inigo Montoya. You kill -9 my parent process. Prepare to die!
    2. Re:Just Released???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That is when they offered the archive. They posted the timeline recently.

    3. Re:Just Released???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I remember this timeline from years ago.

  24. VT100 by johkir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget to change your font to VT100 for that ol' tyme feel. And maybe set the display to green text on black.

    --
    These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
    1. Re:VT100 by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just get opera, swap your pageview (CSS) to "Nostalgia" and live the c64 ! :-P

    2. Re:VT100 by mlk · · Score: 1

      or use lynx, or even better tin ;)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:VT100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick one or the other, but don't do both, or it'll look fake. VT100s didn't have green screens.

    4. Re:VT100 by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      Er, if you say so... Flame Troll :-P But seriously: On 1600x1200 I can easily ignore that bit of advertising. Really. I use Firefox on my Linux Box, if that makes you happy, but it crashes too frequently for my taste... Oh and, just to react to your ideology: The internet is about connections between information providers, information should be free, but is whatever it's creator wants it to be until someone changes that by force, means to access are the same (you don't distinguish data and program, I hope?) and Opera is about a company (a pretty innovative one at that). So: Use whatever browser you like, I like Opera, ok?

    5. Re:VT100 by Tet · · Score: 1
      And maybe set the display to green text on black.

      It has been for the last 2 decades, and I see no reason to change it now. How the current generation lives with black on white text on a display screen is beyond me...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    6. Re:VT100 by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I'll pretend it's my QVT-102. Or I'll use my QVT-102. Or kill me.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  25. The essential is somewhere there, but.... by Bega · · Score: 1

    ...where is the first "First post!!!1one"?

    --

    THIS IS THE INTERNET. PLEASE PICK UP YOUR SERIOUS BUSINESS SUIT AT THE FRONT COUNTER.
    1. Re:The essential is somewhere there, but.... by noselasd · · Score: 1

      Thats a mainly a /. thing. Now, much of usenet users may be dorks, but
      there is NO match fot /. users in that respect :-)

    2. Re:The essential is somewhere there, but.... by teneighty · · Score: 1
      ...where is the first "First post!!!1one"?

      ...Fark.com

  26. Redundant out-of-date copies? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

    On the WWW announcement:

    "This summary does not describe the many exciting possibilities opened up by the WWW project, such as efficient document caching, the reduction of redundant out-of-date copies,..."

    Glad to see that those "out-of-date copies' have been reduced. I don't think I could imagine how many out of date documents there would be in the world if we didn't have the web.

    I'm suprised though that they didn't see the exciting possiblities opened up for online porn. Guess nobody saw that one coming.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:Redundant out-of-date copies? by hdd · · Score: 1
      I'm suprised though that they didn't see the exciting possiblities opened up for online porn. Guess nobody saw that one coming.

      yeah, they could have made billions...and all they had to do was registering ***(you know what)**.com domains. ahr, i guess one thing hasn't changed much...girls are the last thing on a nerd's mind. or is it?

      --
      This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  27. And the best comment.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    comes from randals@azure:

    "I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster. I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts of the Star Wars series."

    Ha!

  28. Update! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2005: Slashdot 'just' posts an article about something Google did in 2001

  29. And of course... by br00tus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Slashdot dutifully reported this three years ago as well, with the same exact link.

  30. me too? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 0

    Someone care to elaborate? This is well before my time.

  31. GNU link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It appears the link to the GNU announcement is broken.

    Also, I have concrete evidence that Microsoft innovates. Once upon a time, the idea of an email virus was a joke:

    Folks, THIS IS A HOAX! IT IS IMPOSSIBLE (I REPEAT) IMPOSSIBLE to transfer a virus via ascii txt/email that will erase your hard drive.

    Thanks to Microsoft, we can now enjoy viruses via the miracle of email!

    1. Re:GNU link? by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      It's still correct, technically. If you don't check your email on Windows, if you don't use Outlook or Outlook Express, if you take your mail as plain text, and if you DON'T CLICK ON UNEXPECTED ATTACHMENTS, you still can't get an email virus.

      Thanks to Microsoft, yes, you can enjoy viruses and spyware and other crap via the miracle of email. So don't use it for email! I don't anymore.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    2. Re:GNU link? by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
      Not true. If I found a buffer overrun in pine, mutt, elm, and/or whatever anyone else uses as a non-windows client, you could use that buffer overflow to propgate an e-mail virus.

      It just so happens, that it takes an incredibly silly mistake. Text email clients have security flaws and fixes that must be applied. I'm sure one of them could be triggered by a specifically constructed e-mail.

      Kirby

    3. Re:GNU link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's true enough. I remember there was a buffer overflow in pine ~1998 at least. It's still a far cry from the 'security hole of the week' that Microsoft are responsible for. I'm not sure where the page went, but I remember a couple of years ago, they had a list of security holes in chronological order. They were averaging five per month.

  32. More than 20 years by TintinX · · Score: 1

    Given that the first Mac rumour post is from 1982, I make that at least 23 years of archive.

    1. Re:More than 20 years by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      That's because this story is three years old :D

  33. y2k prediction by tutwabee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like the Y2K prediciton one. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/net.bugs/brows e_frm/thread/64696a1b035aab72 I didn't realize it was predicted so long ago.

    1. Re:y2k prediction by Kjella · · Score: 1

      1. Clicky here
      2. The y2k problem was never unexpected as such. But in the early days, noone thought their code would still be in use for that long. But since you relied on dates in that format, more and more programs used that format and it became a vicious cycle.

      Particulary when it came to custom code (which was the bulk of the problem, not commercial off-the-shelf software), it often talked to other custom code and you were locked in by fixed data structures and interfaces.

      Remember that this was, by business standards, the very distant future. Most companies have enough problems keeping a sane 5-year plan, far less bother with things that may be a problem 20 years down the road.

      The only reason y2k became such a panic job was that it rode in on top of a long wave, first of IT in the 80s, then Internet in the 90s (including the dotcom era). The industry was booming, skilled people were already in short supply, and y2k came up like a dark cloud of impending doom.

      If the late 90s had been a slump for IT, they'd all buckle in and fix the problems keeping the industry level instead of slumping down, and it'd be no biggie. Of course except for all the loonies who believe that a round number in a calendar made by Romans and modified by Christians in the 16th century actually has any universal meaning, but that's another story.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  34. Sex Stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    What about the first alt.sex.stories post?!

  35. A giggle-inducer by shigelojoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the first mention of "Return of the Jedi":
    I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts of the Star Wars series.

    How about waiting until 2005 to see the first six?

    1. Re:A giggle-inducer by Galvatron · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...And having it be so terrible that we've lost interest?


      Seriously, I wish we could go back in time and tell him not to look forward to it too much...

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:A giggle-inducer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about waiting until 2005 to see the first six?


      Meesa no think so. There are only 3 star wars movies, episodes 4, 5 and 6. And there aren't any cgi characters in those episodes either. And Jar-Jar never existed. Yep, thats it... they were never re-released, and there are no prequels... Nobody would do that to us... ever...
    3. Re:A giggle-inducer by jptechnical · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... how about waiting until 2005 for the reply to his post... What is the TITLE for Episode 4? Someone tell me... oh... I'm in hell!

      --

      Boredom's not a burden anyone should bear.
    4. Re:A giggle-inducer by Sarin · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I wish we could go back in time and tell him not to look forward to it too much...

      Just hit reply on the bottom of the screen

    5. Re:A giggle-inducer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or send him an email. That was, after all, none other than Randal Schwartz.

  36. usenet map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone want to jump on the usenet map where ucbvax!mark left off?

  37. Coming Soon! by Garabito · · Score: 5, Funny
    Slashdot 7 year timeline!

    • First "First post!"
    • First "In Soviet Russia" post
    • First Goatse.cx troll
    • First GNAA troll

    • and,

    • CmdrTaco announcement of the iPod.
    1. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All your bases are belong to US!

    2. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone set up U.S. the bomb!

    3. Re:Coming Soon! by mirko · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALLAHU ACKBAR!

    5. Re:Coming Soon! by Squegie · · Score: 0
      Who can forget:

      • This is news?

    6. Re:Coming Soon! by zackeller · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, the Nomad crushed the iPod, and the lack of wireless proved to be fatal. With headlines like these, who needs psychics? -2, Redundant, Troll, Flamebait

    7. Re:Coming Soon! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      What's really messed up, is that 5 posts down in the iPod announcement, in some guy's sig, is a FREE IPOD! link -_-;;; and I'm NOT making that up!

    8. Re:Coming Soon! by eclectro · · Score: 1

      You forgot the first "BSD is dying" post that started to methodically appear in every thread.

      Also, the first "Natalie Portman petrified" and "Hot Grits"

      Those were the days.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    9. Re:Coming Soon! by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Editorial comments on the news: "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame".

      Hihi :) Who would have thought?

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    10. Re:Coming Soon! by BJH · · Score: 1

      Sigs are retroactive, remember...

    11. Re:Coming Soon! by g00z · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude you must be new here:

      Some (humble) recommendations:

      * First "Pancake Ninja" troll
      * First "Ogg the open source caveman" post
      * First "Jon Kats Sucks" post
      * First appearance of the Bill Gates Borg icon

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    12. Re:Coming Soon! by Sirch · · Score: 1
      Man, you forgot:
      • First posting of "20 years of Usenet"
    13. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the first and last MEEPT posts?

    14. Re:Coming Soon! by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      I remember when I thought Anonymous Coward was one person. Damn, he was funny with that hot grits stuff. Ah, karmaless and naive, those were the days.

    15. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      petrified natalie portman, hot grits, penisbird (the user), there were other classic early trolls, but those are the only ones I can really remember.

    16. Re:Coming Soon! by banausikos · · Score: 0

      First repost of an old story.

    17. Re:Coming Soon! by dcam · · Score: 1

      Further additions

      * First appearance of the Netcraft confirms BSD troll
      * First Natilie Portmann & hot grits

      --
      meh
  38. The new google groups by leoval · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first impression after following the links is how weird the new google groups look. The whole censorship of the original emails is enough to destroy any sense of "history" in the posts.

    I would rather prefer a "perfect" archive, where anyone looking could get a copy of the intact document that was posted at that time.

    I wonder if a balance can be achieved between email harvesting and protecting the original documents.

    1. Re:The new google groups by macmurph · · Score: 1

      I completely agree... Google are you listening? Where is the classic Google Groups that I dearly love?

    2. Re:The new google groups by polyiguana · · Score: 1

      The Canadians have it for now.

    3. Re:The new google groups by polyiguana · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Canadians have it for now.

    4. Re:The new google groups by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      wonder if a balance can be achieved between email harvesting and protecting the original documents.

      It's moronic to hide them in Google's interface when any spammer interested can harvest them directly from a newsfeed. Google still forces you to use an active address when registering to post, and the spammers do harvest that, regardless that's it's munged in Google's interface. And I rather doubt spammers really want a bunch of 20-year-old addresses -- and if anyone is still at the same address that long they're already on every list.

  39. Stallman's announcement of GNU by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative


    The link 'Sep 1983 Stallman's announcement of GNU' doesn't appear to work, but if you search google groups for '771@mit-eddie.UUCP' you can find it.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Stallman's announcement of GNU by wplittle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the lazy, click here

  40. This is Bill Gates first post by br00tus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bill Gates posted to net.micro on July 22, 1983 from microsoft.uucp (from the account of Gordon Letwin, although he signs it as himself) talking about his crazy days at Harvard where he learned to do PEEKs and POKEs (cool, If I was using my Commodore-64 right now I'd do a POKE 53281,6 in honor of Bill)

    1. Re:This is Bill Gates first post by bergeron76 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not simplify things and just:

      10 POKE eye_socket
      20 POKE eye_socket+1
      30 goto 10

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:This is Bill Gates first post by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Oops, I need to patch that code:

      5 SOUND "whooop_whooop_whooop.wav"
      25 SOUND "blink.wav"
      28 SOUND "yeahop!.wav"
      29 REM Stooges rule...

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    3. Re:This is Bill Gates first post by danielrose · · Score: 1

      that changes the border colour to... orangey brown?

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    4. Re:This is Bill Gates first post by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Honestly. No sense of culture :) It sets the background (the border is 53280 or 0xD020) to blue of course. Not that it makes much sense seeing as it's the default anyway.

    5. Re:This is Bill Gates first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you just turned on your C64, and POKEd 53281,6, it wouldn't do anything. 6 = the default blue.

  41. Publication Date???? by sljgh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Clearly no one saw the 2003 at the bottom of the page.

    1. Re:Publication Date???? by PseudoSchizo · · Score: 0

      You must be new around here.

      --
      Proud Rememberer of the BBS Days.
    2. Re:Publication Date???? by nukem996 · · Score: 1

      and anyway if you goto the last one on the list it says "11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive"

  42. I want to see the first spam from 94 by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    The replys would be worth a great laugh since spamming was so abominable back then.

    Also the first goatse.cx pic on slashdot and its replies for those who have never seen it might be hilarious as well.

    Trolling is immature I know but I remember a few of the replies like "GOOOD SFDS*&^~!"

    I think slashdot posted this article 2 years ago with other links like the first IBM pc and a new os called dos. Good stuff.

    1. Re:I want to see the first spam from 94 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is dispicable, using the Net to solicit business.....

      From here :-)~

      Great laugh indeed.

      I wonder what this chap would say about how the net is now. Its like net is synmous with solicitation and business.

    2. Re:I want to see the first spam from 94 by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      I did some reading on Laurence Canter a while back. CNET wrote an article on him and he was asked about his thoughts about the SPAM. He said:

      Given the same set of circumstance--the same time, the stage of the Internet--I'd probably do the same thing. Somebody would have done it, if we hadn't done it.

      Read more here.

      From reading the article, he still thinks the SPAM was a good thing.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  43. /. editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They missed the first "/. editors are morons" post. Oh wait, I saw that on /. over three years ago. Dupe.

  44. Can you do this for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me too?

  45. They left one out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't find the post about the first "blue screen" in a Microsoft Windows product.

  46. Googles Usenet search is really really bad. by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using usenet since 89, seen many different usenet programs and web interfaces. Just for the heck of it, I tried to search some old amiga/commodore groups, and early fido/bbs groups, what a lack of searchs. I did some searchs back before google took over, and Deja had those posts, google seems to be missing information.

    Search by reverse date is missing.
    Threaded and hourly view is missing, too much crap on the screen.
    Side bars in the way. (Again more crap)

    Pretty much, I browse a few groups, but with perlmonks and other major discussion groups going to forums and leaving usenet, its more of a legacy I still enjoy than can use.

    Always wished people using bbforums would have an archived usenet feed just to keep a history. Also you dont need to belong to the forum.

    I feel forum's killed usenet, and forums are rather weak.
    How many forums are you on? Slashdot and about 6 dozen more.

    While im glad Google has taken over, I wish they could at least make a forum interface that doesnt suck.

    1. Re:Googles Usenet search is really really bad. by value_added · · Score: 1

      "Pretty much, I browse a few groups, but with perlmonks and other major discussion groups going to forums ..."

      And what does the forum content on perl monks have that comp.lang.perl.misc, for example, doesn't?

      We seem to agree that the "forums" approach in all but a few rare cases is somewhere between embarassing and woefully inadequate, but I don't agree that with their smattering of content and animated gifs, their "popularity" is indicative of any trend.

      Usenet is alive and well and will continue to be. Forums will always suck. Between the two are mailing lists, and only to the extent where one has access to to archived content (ideally downloadable in mbox format) so one can process/search/read that content as one prefers.

      Google's efforts in this area are admirable, but I see no reason why anyone should hold their breath expecting a revolutionary interface for what is and always will be a text medium. Put another way, the pithy phrase "All email clients suck, but mutt sucks less." sums it up nicely.

      If you don't have a good usenet feed, or aren't maintaining your own archives, you can at any time download a huge amount of content (both archived and current) from news.gmane.org (?), and "browse" it as you see fit, all without resorting to Google's or anyone else's interface. That should cover 90% of anyone's needs. Google IMHO is more appropriate for what is covered with the dust of history.

  47. Seriously now! by antoy · · Score: 1

    What the hell? This "news item" is is 3 to 4 years old, and the VERY FIRST LINE of the article says that the "20 years" are from 1981 to - we'll need mathematics here - 2001! (If you're wondering, we're in the year 2005 now.)

    That page has been there forever, I've visited it multiple times a long time ago and I'm certainly not the only one.

    I'm sorry, it's just that sometimes I wonder what the editors are doing in this site. It's not rocket science, dammit.

  48. Where's the first... by midifarm · · Score: 1
    Apple's going out of business???

    Peace

    1. Re:Where's the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A week before Apple came into being.

    2. Re:Where's the first... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      here is a reply to a post implying Apple is on shaky financial ground from October 1985. That's nearly 20 years of going out of buniness "real soon now"!

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  49. First Mentifex AI Post -- Also 20 Years Ago! by Mentifex · · Score: 0


    The first Mentifex AI post was also twenty years ago.

  50. someone explain BIFF to me by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1
    1. Re:someone explain BIFF to me by tinrobot · · Score: 1

      Not sure about that post, but BIFF is a mail notification program.

      I think it was named after the author's dog, who apparently barked at the mailman.

    2. Re:someone explain BIFF to me by aardvarko · · Score: 1

      It's B1FF, not BIFF.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B1FF

      quote follows:
      --
      B1FF was the most famous pseudonym, and the prototypical newbie, on Usenet.

      Articles from BIFF were characterised by all uppercase letters sprinkled liberally with bangs, typos, "cute" misspellings (EVRY BUDY LUVS GOOD OLD BIFF CUZ HE'S A K00L DOOD AN HE RITES REEL AWESUM THINGZ IN CAPITULL LETTRS LIKE THIS!!!), use (and often misuse) of fragments of chat abbreviations, a long sig block (sometimes even a doubled sig), and unbounded naïveté. BIFF posts articles using his elder brother's Commodore VIC-20. BIFF's location is a mystery, as his articles appear to come from a variety of sites. However, BITNET seems to be the most frequent origin. The theory that BIFF is a denizen of BITNET is supported by BIFF's (unfortunately invalid) electronic mail address: .

      Later information indicates that BIFF was originally created by Joe Talmadge, also the author of the infamous and much-plagiarised "Flamer's Bible". The BIFF filter he wrote was later passed to Richard Sexton, who posted BIFFisms much more widely. Versions have since been posted for the amusement of the net at large.

    3. Re:someone explain BIFF to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:someone explain BIFF to me by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

      thanks. Should have thought about wikipedia, oh well. Probably wouldn't catch the one anyway.

    5. Re:someone explain BIFF to me by rs79 · · Score: 1

      To understand BIFF you need to have met Joe Talmadge and have hung out in talk.bizarre in the late 80s. Joe made up a raft of characters to, uh, sympatehetically reapond to various soc.singles morons. There was _SYSTEMS ADMINISITRATOR MAN_ (whose tights always chafed). There was Steve Supportive (soc.singles reader for 3 years!) a raft of others, and BIFF. BIFF was the prototypical noob and various people kept BIFF alive for a few years - Joe only posted at BIFF 2 or 3 times. I posted as BIFF about a dozen times, but never used numbers instead of letters, it was Rob Clark of PSU that did that and the little fuckwit taught half his school howe to forge posts so there were lots of dorky BIFF postings after that and I gave up.

      In summary: you had to be there. But you wern't born yet.

      If Joe Talmadge were here he'd flame your mother and ask for your sisters phone number.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    6. Re:someone explain BIFF to me by rs79 · · Score: 1

      HI! I AM BIFF!

      MY BROTHER SHOWED ME THIS ARTILE
      AND IT'S NOT WRIGHT!! THERE NEVER
      WAS A BIFF FILTER!! (HAH! LIKE ONE
      WOULD RUN ON MY VIC20!) IT WAS ALL
      JUST TYPED IN BY ME AND MY BIG BROTHER
      WHO HAS ONE OF THOSE AWSOME C64'S!!!

      HOPE THIS HELPS!

      --
      BIFF
      BIFF@BIT.NET
      --
      BIFF
      BIFF@BIT.NET

      Wiki is wrong. What a shock.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:someone explain BIFF to me by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      For times like this, you're much better off going over to the Jargon File and reading about it - for example, check out their entry for biff and, once there, follow the link to the amusing B1FF.

      It looks like the Wiki uses this source data, by the way.

      Anyway, enjoy the file. At some point you'll probably just read it all. At least, I know that I have. I believe that its available as a single HTML file for your browsing convenience, but I'm too lazy to look for it right now.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  51. Not irony, but a direct connection. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In 1993, a group of Qaeda-networked assholes based out of Sudan bombed the WTC. What's amazing to me, a New Yorker, is that Giuliani was on duty both that day, and in 2001, when bin Ladin's Qaeda finally succeeded in destroying the WTC, and Giuliani emerged as a hero. Rather than the guy who let bin Ladin get away with it twice. And then used his hero status to back a war in Iraq, rather than finishing the war in Afghanistan, with his own NYC Police Chief, Kerik, running the security disaster in Iraq. How do any of these guys, including bin Ladin, keep their jobs with such lethally catastrophic performance?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we all know about the powerful NY Interlligance Agency that does covert overseas work and spies on the world at large.

      Hmmm... wait a second... I read farther.

      Yep, you're a troll. Sorry I wasted my time.

    2. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said: "In 1993, a group of Qaeda-networked assholes based out of Sudan bombed the WTC."

      The bombing was not carried out by al Qaeda. Just individuals in affiliated terrorist groups. al Qaeda was fairly young at that time and probably did not know of the plot until it was complete. Its not really justified to say that "[al] Qaeda finally succeeded in destroying the WTC" other than in the sense that they finished the work that other terrorist groups started in 1993. al Qaeda only attacked New York once. It attacked the rest of the world many times before that. To say that Guilani let bin Ladin get away with the attacks twice is like saying that it was the mayor of Honolulu's fault for not arresting Hirohito for the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Nonesense!

    3. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're a nonsensical twit. If you can't even spell your content-free flames, keep them to yourself, stupidfoo.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      You're a nonsensical twit. If you can't even spell your content-free flames, keep them to yourself, stupidfoo.

      And your post had "content"? Give me a break. Your post was the most jumbled collection of idiotic thought that I've seen in quite some time. How the hell does a mayor of New York stop terrorists, who highjack planes out of the Boston area, from smashing planes into buildings? And, btw:

      You're a nonsensical twit. If you can't even spell correctly in your content-free flames, keep them to yourself, stupidfoo.

      You're a nonsensical twit. If you can't even correctly form sentences in your content-free flames, keep them to yourself, Doc Ruby.

    5. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You don't really get what the Qaeda terrorist network is. It's a network, formally begun in 1998, though informally operating since at least 1983. Rahman and Yousef, directors of the 1993 attack, are directly connected to Qaeda. Qaeda is like the Internet, and Rahman/Yousef is like a LAN of servers; its a virtual organization of organizations, a communications system between them. As a distributed federation, it is the affilliation among the groups.

      Let's say that Hirohito attacked downtown Honolulu (not just the naval base), killing hundreds and knocking out 5% of its real estate, nearly destroying it and killing tens of thousands in 1933. Let's say that Hirohito was a rogue maniac, attacking with a trailer truck full of oil and fertilizer (McVeigh/OK-city style), not the emperor of a giant nation. Let's say he attacked again in 1941, hijacking an American fleet of planes with a team of kamikazes somehow recruited from northern Korea, actually firebombing that 5% of Honolulu, killing thousands, shutting down the city, while simultaneously destroying 20% of the naval base across the island. Let's say that Hawaii is a separate nation, the only global economic/military superpower, whose president is replaced by one of the mayor's closest political allies the year before the second, successful attack. Let's say the mayor goes around campaigning for that president, backing his war in Vietnam, sending his crooked police chief who was on duty while crime dropped in Honolulu during the unprecedented boom of the 1930s, as Hawaii came out of recession to claim that superpower status. Quite a stretch of the imagination, in Hawaii, which spent those 8 years in Depression, while the first attack exists only because you suggested this analogy. Well, if Giuliani were mayor of that Hawaii, I'd ask him, "where's Hirohito? Because if he's going to take credit for protecting Honolulu, he's got to take the blame for the two devastating attacks he did too little to prevent, and wear the shame of promoting a catastrophic war in a country that had nothing to do with the attacks.

      If politics were "run like a business", like Giuliani's Republican cronies like to say in propaganda, they'd all be fired for total incompetence, and probably up on charges of malfeasance, to say nothing of embezzlement and no-show.

      BTW, Qaeda's attacks on the rest of the world (including Americans) is yet another set of guilt Giuliani must carry for not stopping them before they attacked again, anywhere. How's that for "nonsense", Anonymous flaming Coward?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Giuliani was hailed as a hero because of the way he acted after the 9/11 attack, keeping the city (and to a certain extent the country) calm and functioning in the face of what was a frightening incident. Giuliani didn't have the resources or even power to do somehow prevent an international terror group based, at the time, in Florida and acting in such secret even the CIA clearly didn't know what was going on. What he did have the ability to do was act the leader once it happened. And he did. This guy who was considered by most people I know to be little more than a conservative mini-despot suddenly, somehow, united the city around him.

      In many ways, Giuliani was also hailed as a hero because he stepped up to the plate at a time when nobody else in the country in a position of authority was apparently doing so. It was several hours before a clearly frightened Bush appeared on television to make a meaningless speech in his usual halting style. The first major government figure who turned up in New York City was Bill Clinton, and he wasn't President any more.

      I think it's a tad unfair to blame Giuliani for either terror attack. There was little in practice he'd have been able to do about 9/11. To know about it, the NYPD would have had to be better equiped and more organized internationally than the NSA and CIA. To do anything about it the same NYPD would have had to be paramilitary in nature, AAA gun turrets would have had to be stationed around the city, and New York would have had to have the power to invade Florida at will.

      If you're trolling, I apologise. If you're not, really, you need to be a little more reasonable.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      All you've got is hate, stupid'. The content you dislike (though can't quite formulate a coherent response, except basic denial) is content: facts, logic, references. Want to know how Giuliani could have stopped terrorists hijacking Boston planes? He could have gotten his buddy, President Bush, to heed the warning "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US", noticed the foiled Qaeda attack on the Eiffel Tower earlier in the year, and interrogated Rahman, imprisoned a block away from City Hall for the 1993 bombings. As the "NYC prosecutor turned mayor", so tightly connected to the FBI, the president, and a tightly knit police state, he had the motive, the means and opportunity to kill bin Laden before bin Laden killed us.

      If you're going to parrot Rice's weaselly excuses about "smashing planes into buildings" somehow surprising our intelligence community while it was sending warnings about exactly that to our "leaders", you should at least link to her statements, as at least some kind of apparent substance to your bullshit. Pumping the rightwing echo chamber doesn't cut it outside of your numbskull cronies. And if you can't even understand English, criticisizing perfect grammar, it's obvious just that your FU is BAR, stupid'.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You've drunk the koolaid. Giuliani kept his cool after the attack, and he deserves credit for that: his job as mayor, which he performed admirably amidst the chaos. I wasn't surprised, though, because Giuliani operates so calmly amidst chaos that his governing style in NYC relied on creating conflict - he thrives on chaos and strife, while peace is an unfamiliar environment he never learned to negotiate.

      FYI, the mayor, and the NYPD he oversees, is quite "paramilitary", both in armament and structure. Giuliani worked closely with the FBI, via their major office in NYC, for example while eliminating one of the NYC mafia families (to the benefit of the rest, but that's another Giuliani debunking story). There were many junctures at which he could have worked with national intelligence organizations, which were tracking Qaeda threats on the US (and therefore, clearly NYC, which they had attacked in 1993 at the WTC itself). NYC's mayor, with a $50B annual budget, 10-15M constituents, and no "Congress", is proportionally more powerful than even the President, except militarily - so the NYPD is quite "paramilitary" to protect our empire here. Without working in Giuliani's office, it's hard to demand specific actions he failed to execute, but he surely could have had Rahman interrogated, jailed a block from City Hall, and due to be sentenced for his 1993 WTC bombing the day after the 2001 attacks. Waiting until the planes were incoming would have been a failure, too - and the NYPD doesn't need to "invade" Florida (to find the flight school from which Qaeda had graduated?); the mayor can just oversee the FBI as it raids the terrorists while they plan their acts. If he cares enough to actually use his options, consume some political capital in an operation that, since preemptive of terrorism, few people will ever hear about.

      In NYC, top execs are responsible for what happens on their watch. That's how we stay on top in global business: accountability, demanding performance. That's why these execs demand, and get, such power over their fiefdoms. When they let something that bad happen twice, they're responsible. When they turn around and claim credit for "making NYC safer", while both leaving us knowingly vulnerable, and even promoting the threat (like starting a second war in Iraq), they're part of the threat.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Nazi's will be mentioned in three more posts. ANd no, Godwin didn't say it first.

      And the timeline sucks ass. For a guy named Pike to leave out sci.aquaria is inexcusable.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    10. Re:Not irony, but a direct connection. by /ASCII · · Score: 1

      Your link to Godwins statement clearly states that this is not the first time he made it. So you have not supplied any evidence that someone beat Godwin to it.

      --
      Try out fish, the friendly interactive shell.
  52. Incredible by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

    This is our history. Yet, nothing in there about poor Slashdot.

    --
    Your ad here.
  53. December 2004: Google Ruins Google Groups Usenet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope they are honest about that part of usenet history...

  54. First Mention of Slashdot.org by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nov 4, 1997

    This will link to it: http://tinyurl.com/6sz2j

    Why is it in a strange language?

    First English mention is Nov 14, 1997.

    http://tinyurl.com/5snrm

    1. Re:First Mention of Slashdot.org by MalachiConstant · · Score: 1
      Just out of curiosity, why are you using tinyurl? Seeing that kind of link on a public message board generally means GOATSE or something similar. Why not just say:

      Nov 4, 1997:First mention of slashdot.org. Why is it in a strange language?

      First English mention is on Nov 14, 1997.

      As I understand it services like tinyurl are designed to make it easy to give a large URL to someone when you can't present it electronically.

    2. Re:First Mention of Slashdot.org by Maqueo · · Score: 1

      Why is it in a strange language?

      It's just dutch...

    3. Re: First Mention of Slashdot.org by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > First English mention is Nov 14, 1997.

      And true to form, it's about something being "raported" on Slashdot.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:First Mention of Slashdot.org by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 1

      The strange language is Dutch, spoken in the Netherlands, the nothern part of Belgium (this particular post was from .be), the Antilles and Suriname.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

  55. Al Gore is not mention... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    Where's first mention of Al Gore announcing that he invented the Internet? You can't live the "founding father" of the Internet off the timeline. :P

    1. Re:Al Gore is not mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you're joking. I hope your joking. If you are, fine but try to be a little more clear about it. If not, Gore didn't make that claim; conservatives twisted Gore's words about his support for the creation of the Internet into that. Second, do some reading. In fact, go find a copy of Where Wizards Stay up Late and ask yourself, of all the politicians in the world, why did the guys who truly invented the Internet invite Al Gore to their 25-year reunion party? Maybe they fell for Rush Limbaugh's lies too, huh?

    2. Re:Al Gore is not mention... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Does this :P mean anything? Maybe you should read up on your emoticons. :)

      BTW, Where The Wizards Stay Up Late is a good book.

  56. Maybe their new post numbering by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    scheme hosed them too. That timeline is old.

    (didn't look at the thread, just grumbing about the groops interface chaneges..)

    1. Re:Maybe their new post numbering by stanmann · · Score: 1

      use the workaround at groups.google.ca or groups.google.co.uk

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  57. where is by hdd · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    first time used for file trading? for those of who don't know about it, usenet is/will the next big thing for file trading

    wants to see what is there already? http://www.newzbin.com/

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  58. Wow. by docotron · · Score: 1

    This surely is the longest-apart dupe story ever.

    1. Re:Wow. by wpanderson · · Score: 1

      yeah, this is pretty ridiculous - surely a rudimentary search by the admin could have picked up the dupe ... wow, look what the first hit on google brings up! Come on, timothy, keep up! :)

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
  59. ... sort of by teneighty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's only sort of a dupe. The timeline wasn't *directly* mentioned in the original article.


    That said, I think we need to award a 5 yard penalty against the editor for not following the proper rules when posting a dupe (i.e. one must post blatant dupes - any attempt to be clever is against the rules and is very much frowned upon).

    1. Re:... sort of by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      It's only sort of a dupe. The timeline wasn't *directly* mentioned in the original article.

      A search with keywords "usenet" and "timeline" directly point to the old article. The editor is at fault.

      The problem with this dupe is that is says "Google just released" which implies "few days" in my mind, when reading in the /. context. Not 3 years.

  60. The first linux post? by Strudleman · · Score: 1

    Funny, in the first ever linux post, he referes to a previous post about it :)

    --
    Do it doug.
  61. this is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive

    Slashdot you are only 3 years late.

    btw, this (from Linus) is interesting:

    >2. PORTABILITY

    "Portability is for people who cannot write new programs"
    -me, right now (with tongue in cheek)


    I bet you're hitting your head right now Linus...

  62. The AIDS post by thesatch · · Score: 1

    "wivax!evans Dec 21 1982, 4:52 am show options
    The disease sounds very frightening. I had heard about it about two weeks ago. Seems like the public should be more aware of it. Anybody have any info on it? Barry Evans"

    Did that creep the fuck out of anyone else?

    1. Re:The AIDS post by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      You stole that from the second post on AIDS.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    2. Re:The AIDS post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you white trash texan motherfucker.

      Your mother should have had the abortion.

  63. First mention of Star Wars Episode 6... by discontinuity · · Score: 1

    Snippet from this Usenet post from 1982:

    I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster. I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts of the Star Wars Series.

    1997?!?

  64. Douglas Adams' post, forever the optimist. by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll try and post news here from time to time if it
    seems like it might interest people - for instance, it looks as if the HHGG
    movie is finally coming after the shelf after 10 years.


    This post was made in 1993.

    1. Re:Douglas Adams' post, forever the optimist. by kex · · Score: 1

      And it is finally being released- by disney of all companies.

      --
      I try not to laugh in death's face. I tend to make belittling comments and snicker behind death's back.
    2. Re:Douglas Adams' post, forever the optimist. by kex · · Score: 1

      http://hitchhikers.movies.go.com/ And of all companies- disney is producing it... Will the mouse be taking his towel with him?

      --
      I try not to laugh in death's face. I tend to make belittling comments and snicker behind death's back.
  65. Reply?! by erlando · · Score: 1

    Somehow I find it funny that Google provides a "reply"-link for usenet-posts from 1985.. :o)

    --
    Remember, there are no stupid questions. But there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
    1. Re:Reply?! by g00z · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you have to wait that long to get an answer to your question

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  66. Watch The Video - Al Gore says it - CRAZY by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 0, Troll
    "Gore didn't make that claim; conservatives twisted Gore's words about his support for the creation of the Internet into that."

    At about time stamp 0:50 of the video from CNN's Wolf Blitzer March 9, 1999 Late Edition/PrimeTime interview with Al Gore you will watch Al Gore claim that he "took the initiative in creating the Internet"



    "We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
    - George Orwell (?)

    --

    I believe Juanita

    1. Re:Watch The Video - Al Gore says it - CRAZY by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      At about time stamp 0:50 of the video from CNN's Wolf Blitzer March 9, 1999 Late Edition/PrimeTime interview with Al Gore you will watch Al Gore claim that he "took the initiative in creating the Internet"

      Yep. And?! Anyone who can't separate the talking point soundbite from fact is either being intentionally obtuse, or is simply a raving moron.

      Al Gore, as a member of the US Congress, authored legislation to fund fiber optic research, and spearheaded funding for specific projects that transformed DARPAnet into the "Interweb" whose teet we milk from today. This is provable, well-documented fact, evidenced in public record.

      Literate people call this "taking the initiative".

    2. Re:Watch The Video - Al Gore says it - CRAZY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Exactly! Thanks for proving the point that Gore didn't claim invented the Internet.

      For those of you who have accepted the words of Rush "Wormtongue" Limbaugh, watch that video. Watch it closely. Then ask yourself: where exactly did Gore make the statement that "I invented the Internet," which is what conservatives attribute to him routinely? BTW, "took the initiative in creating the Internet" can mean many things, the most likely being that he (as a senator) took the intiative as a lawmaker in the creation of the Internet, i.e. that he use his legislative influence to help fund and push the creation of the Internet forward. All this back before AOL and before eBay and long before the World Wide Web, back before most people had any idea where this stuff was going or that it would have the kind of impact that it has had. That's called having vision, being informed, understaning the technology. Gore didn't invent the Internet, but he knew what it was going to be, he knew it was worth funding.

      Those of you who think otherwise, try looking into it yourself. The evidence is there.

  67. Anyone catch the www response by drix · · Score: 5, Funny
    Even better is what some smartass posted 12 years later in response to the original www thread:
    Tim,

    I have to say that this "world wide web" thing sounds like a ridiculous concept. I can't imagine it will take off. Next thing you'll tell us is that people can do commerce through the "web" or even browse pornography! I would never invest in it. I am going to put my money in something with real potential, namely a floppy disk that can hold 1.8 megabytes. This should be able to hold all the data you could possibly want to carry around with you, for decades to come.
    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    1. Re:Anyone catch the www response by bkocik · · Score: 1
      Heh . . . I had missed that. It was not, however, lost on me that the world's first mention of the www also contains what has to be the world's first now-dead link:

      Documentation is readable using www (Plain text of the instalation instructions is included in the tar file!). Document

      http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html

      is as good a place to start as any. Note these coordinates may change with later releases.

    2. Re:Anyone catch the www response by mo^ · · Score: 1

      I find the use of the word "coordinates" interesting here..

      seems to indicate the very techie-ness of the web at that time, as opposed to the more everyday "address" we use today..

      --
      bah!*@%!
  68. From Douglas Adam's first post: by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    [Oct 4 1993, 10:25 am]
    "I'll try and post news here from time to time if it seems like it might interest people - for instance, it looks as if the HHGG movie is finally coming after the shelf after 10 years."


    Heh.

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  69. mod parent up by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    now lets find some rms entries on alt.sex.amateur.nasal or something :D

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  70. The Real 1984 Advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish Windows were more compatible with the Apple Macintosh.

    Steve Jobs

    >>I wish Windows were more compatible with the
    >>Apple Macintosh.
    >>
    >>Steve Jobs

    Me too!

    William Gates

  71. Not quite new by drivinghighway61 · · Score: 1

    This wasn't just released. I saw it a while ago.

  72. Britney's first mention a hit? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    "It was like a dream come true," said Britney, who has
    wide-set brown eyes and a broad smile. "It was all I'd really
    wanted since I was 8. They called on the phone and said, 'You're
    going to be a Mouseketeer,' and I just started screaming. 'I'm so
    excited, I'm so excited,' and jumping up and down."

    -snip-

    The Mouseketeers don't wear Mouse
    ears and uniforms; they wear colorful, stylish clothes. They sing
    the old theme ("M-I-C -- 'see you real soon' -- K-E-Y -- 'Why?
    Because we like you' -- M-O-U-S-E"), but follow with a song that
    has a hip-hop beat and lyrics like "MMC is always in the groove!"


    It was like a dream come true
    It was all I'd really wanted
    I'm so excited
    I'm so excited
    and jumping up and down

    M-I-C -- see you real soon
    K-E-Y -- why?
    Because we like you!
    M-O-U-S-E
    MMC is always in the groove!

    Hmmm, this is turning out to be on par on Britney's other songs!

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  73. Too bad they don't carry the binaries groups by forged · · Score: 1

    Commercial newsgroup providers advertise a 50+ days retention and 99+% completeness of the alt.binaries stuff. Google has exactly none. I'm sure that collectively we could find one or two instances where access to past binary content would be useful, past the obvious I'm sure I've already seen the same girl before or there was this game 10 years ago...

    1. Re:Too bad they don't carry the binaries groups by stanmann · · Score: 1

      In fact, they no longer even archive the binary groups... one of the nice things deja had was the ability to access archived 0files from binary groups.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  74. Personal First Post? by scherrey · · Score: 1

    Yeah this story is old but I noticed in the advanced search option (for the first time) that I can sort by date. Found out my very first (documented) usenet post was 23 Nov 1994 06:53:17 GMT to comp.lang.c++. Wow - it really doesn't seem that long ago. Of course, the S/N ratio was already pretty bad and BIX (my service provider) was a far more useful resource.

    Alas poor BIX... sniff

    1. Re:Personal First Post? by saddino · · Score: 1

      Sep 23, 1983 4:11 pm: me as a 14 year old getting the guts to post to Usenet -- adding to a thread on post-(nuclear)holocaust films. I remember being thrilled that someone actually responded to my post. Ah the days of being an awkward computer teen :-)

  75. Er... by szobatudos · · Score: 1, Funny
    Hi All, google could be a bit more PC, the sponsored links at the first 9/11 postings are:

    langaAir Flight Training Career / Accelerated Pilot Training Deferred payment option.

    Fly at Eagle Aircraft Finance Your Flight Training. Chicago area career & recreational

    Airline Training Programs $37,995 / 90 Days / Actual Jet Exp. 200 Hrs / 7 Ratings / Nationwide XC

    Terrorists welcome?

    1. Re:Er... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      google could be a bit more PC, the sponsored links at the first 9/11 postings are...

      The posts are about aircraft, so are the ads. You don't think there are clerks manually selecting the ads for every search you do, do you?

    2. Re:Er... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      But something Google should do is NOT let people reply to threads after a certain period, a few months maybe -- some idiots are posting on these threads three years later.

    3. Re:Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is probably going to come as a shock to you so sit down and brace yourself:

      Google does not control Usenet.

    4. Re:Er... by 1u3hr · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Some AC wrote: This is probably going to come as a shock to you so sit down and brace yourself:Google does not control Usenet.

      I said they shouldn't let you post. Through Google. I've been using Usenet since about 1978, I know how it works. (Yes, it wasn't called "Usenet" back then if you want to be a smart arse again.)

    5. Re:Er... by harmonica · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've been using Usenet since about 1978, I know how it works.

      Since it was invented at that time, you must have been one of the first to use it. If you're not making this up. Care to elaborate on how and where you heard about it, and some experiences from that time? Just interested.

    6. Re:Er... by m50d · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but they could avoid putting a reply button by any post older than, say, a year. "Normal" news servers don't carry old messages, so you can't reply to them except manually, which is a good thing. Google should be the same.

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:Er... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's not the old google groups "same title = same thread" bug?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Er... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you're not making this up... Care to elaborate

      As I said, it wasn't called "Usenet" then. Just a command line "news" running on a BSD system, as I dimly recall. About 5 articles a day. As a lowly 2nd year student at Melbourne Uni, an early adopter of Unix. I didn't have much access time or privileges.

      I note that both your and my posts have been modded "flamebait". How perverse.

    9. Re:Er... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure. Hang around for a few months in any historically popular newsgroup and you'll see someone replying to a thread that ended years ago, and if you look at their user-agent it's almost certain to be google groups.

      --
      I am trolling
  76. First Review of the IBM PC by serutan · · Score: 1

    From the First review of the IBM-PC
    For $ 1,565 you get a keyboard and logic unit with 16K RAM and a Basic interpreter in 40K ROM. A cassette interface is built in, I think; but no diskette or monitor at this price -- you use your TV set... A "business configuration" with 64K, dual diskettes, printer, and "color graphics" goes for about $4,500.

    Yikes! Hard to imagine people bought those things!

    1. Re:First Review of the IBM PC by Monf · · Score: 1
      I bought a business class minus the printer for $2300 via IBM's "Socrates" program for colleges.

      Having TWO 5 1/4" DD floppies was WAY cool... plus IBM DOS 1.1 and real manuals...

      ...damn, I'm old...

      --
      Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
  77. Where is... by arose · · Score: 1

    The first dupe?

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  78. This has been around for a couple of years.. by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

    This is *old* news. That list has been around since about 2002, pretty much unchanged. If you think of everything that's happened since 9/11, you'd expect a few more things in that timeline.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  79. First Y2k solution by Cainjustcain · · Score: 5, Funny
    "In 1978, when I was working in banking, I ran across a curious date storage format. It seems that transaction dates were coded with the last digit of the year in one nibble, the month in hex in the next, and the date (in packed decimal) in the next two

    "Good grief!" said I. "What happens in January of 1980?" She turned pale and admitted she had considered that before but managed to put it out of her mind. "So why not go ahead and fix it now?" I asked.

    She pointed out that fixing it would require expanding the demand deposit master record format, a mammoth undertaking. About a billion COBOL programs would have to be recompiled. At this shop we were still on cards and a rush compile took about a week. "You want to do that?" she inquired. This time I turned pale. We onsidered our options, knowing that one or the other of us would be called upon to fix the problem. And you know what we did?

    First, I modified the daily demand deposit program with code that checked for the date and about mid-1979 started printed warnings on the console of what would happen come new year. Then the systems analyst and I got new jobs. This is known as stepwise interactive development."

  80. Dear Linus by Phil_Nelson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't you take a hint??
    Stop trying to get in touch with me!!
    It's OVER. Just get over it.
    I'm sure in time you'll agree this was the best thing to do.

    Moving on,
    Phil

  81. They forgot one by peggus · · Score: 1

    How I met the girl who is now my wife.
    First msg is from my wife, I'm not one of the people who replied in the thread.

  82. Chuckletrousers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the infamous Chuckletrousers post...

    If I remember right, it brought about Dave Barry's departure from usenet.

  83. Wasn't this covered years ago? by Uriel · · Score: 1

    In this article? In...2001? It's very neat, of course, but...

    1. Re:Wasn't this covered years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, sure sounds familiar, and the copyright on that page (the timeline) is 2003, but this is Slashdot, so "news" just means "hey, I just ran across this" -- i.e., it's pseudo-chronology based on individual awareness rather than chronology based on time.

  84. If you haven't done it yet... by CliffH · · Score: 1

    ... and have some spare time. Do a groups search for Linus and check out some of the conversations going on in the newsgroups circa 91, 92, when people were still trying to really help eachother and explain things thoroughly. Not that people aren't trying to help others now, there's just a lot more noise. And, just for fun, find a reference to Linus talking about his days programming on Vic-20's. :)

    --
    sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
  85. How embarrassing... by bennomatic · · Score: 1
    Don't know why I hadn't thought to do this before, but I searched for my old OCF email address from back in 1989 when I was but a pup with my first net access.

    Sure enough, there I am... a total Amiga fanboi. My favorite thread from that era is one where I made a typo ("add" vs. "ad" for advertisement, abbreviated), and someone flamed me for it. That person had a "to" vs "too" typo in their sig and some kind person flamed them for that.

    Ah, those mere much more innocent days.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:How embarrassing... by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      That's 'were' not 'mere' ! How long before you learn to type, you idoit?

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    2. Re:How embarrassing... by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      That can't match what we found when we did a search for someone that was applying for a job. We didn't point it out to him for a year (we still hired him), and when we did, he promptly had Google remove it, as it had been posted under his name by an x-gf he had cheated on. I'll leave it to your imagination what it contained, but it was DAMN funny.

  86. Preliminary scholarship reveals by vanderleun · · Score: 1

    That of the 800 million messages half were signed by kibo and the other half written by mnemonic.

  87. Dejanews can't really tell us about first anything by ninti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, this is great and all, but their archive is way too incomplete to really make statments like this is the first post mentioned this or that. Just looking at my own posts from even 10 years ago I can see huge gaps of stuff they just don't have. Hell, just pick an early thread and look at all the posts that have another post quoted, but the original post is not there.

  88. check the Last-Modified date: by EqualSlash · · Score: 1


    Basically this is a repost more than 3 years old but at least the Last-Modified date shows "Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:41:48 GMT". Still, there's no reason why this has to be news.

  89. Huh. by marevan · · Score: 1

    It seems that Microsoft was a decent company in the past. What happened to you Bill?! :P

  90. Google Groups 2 clutter by cimetmc · · Score: 1

    Sadly, the historic threads are becoming more and more cluttered with messages posted through the new Google Groups 2 interface. In their infinite wisdom, Google decided to drop the 1 month limit of replying and you can for example see the effect of this in the Linux annoucement thread.

    Marcel

  91. Anyone else think... by theshroud · · Score: 1

    ...this entire post is a troll? The submitter's blog is about penis pills, fer chrissakes.

  92. You're funny! by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    I can't believe I let that one slip! How perfect is that?

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  93. Games that have stood the test of time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the first announcement for my favorite multiplayer internet game, The Last Outpost. It is hard to believe that it has been up and running the net for nearly 13 years. According to the Google timeline, that sucker predates the web! Anyway, the game is still free to play, and still a lot of fun.

    They've also got a list up on the game's website of other game servers on the internet that have stood the test of time that are worth checking out too. How the heck can anyone run a server for that long?

  94. Missing: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1
    • first "*plonk*"
    • orgin of the term "sock puppet"
    • first pron binary
    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Missing: by rs79 · · Score: 1

      First *plonk* was me circa 1988 or 1989. It would have been talk.bizare x-posted to alt.flame.

      I think it was the one where I flamed some guy for not putting enough e-stamps on his e-mail.

      Technically it's the sound some asshole makes when he falls into yout killfile.

      I got it from my boss, Greg Laskin, who use to hold the garbage can up to the phone when talking to vendors:

      "(THUNK) Hear that? That's your product going in the trash. Get me a propeer manual and we MIGHT use it" and of course the manual showed up the next day.

      Greg ran gryphon.com which was the first UNIX/PC on usenet (MS 286 xenix actually).

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:Missing: by rs79 · · Score: 1

      That's not actually the first one. When I made it up I had to explain to the fucktard I was flaming what it meant; the true first *plonk* post has this explanation.

      What was I doing up at 4:21 am? Uh, never mind. Maybe this is why I havn't had a job since all useent archives went online.

      I blame society.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:Missing: by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      I know it's not the first one. That's why I said "in the archive" there, Poindexter. Oh, what's the fucking use? *PLONK* :)

  95. Such a nice young man-*ding* You got Ulcer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "His email is at least fairly focused. I imagine people who work on things that are more user facing (GNOME, KDE etc) must get a whole lot of stuff coming their way..."

    Hey! When will KDE and GNOME merge? :>

  96. Too bad they don't carry the binaries groups-Big C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not going to happen. One space reasons. Two copyright reasons (you can thank people who abused copyright for that one).

  97. Re:How perfect is that? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    There is probably some deep psychological meaning to be derived. Although not by the current state of the 'art' of analysis. And certainly not at those prices.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  98. They forgot the release of PGP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    IMHO, one of the most important announcements of all was the release of PGP. If that hadn't happened, the odds are pretty good we wouldn't have secure public key crypto today. The Senate was actually looking at outlawing public crypto back in the summer of 1991.

    So, here' the announcement of PGP on June 7, 1991.

    The story behind the actual release is amusing too. Kelly Goen wanted to make sure the word got out, so he drove to a payphone, upload it to a server, and called Jim Warren of Microtimes in case someone bumped him off: Here's a copy of Jim's amusing description, along with his visit by the Feds.

    My favorite quote: On a weekend around the first of June, Goen began uploading complete PGP to systems around the U.S. He called several times, telling me his progress.

    He was driving around the Bay Area with a laptop, acoustic coupler and a cellular phone. He would stop at a pay-phone; upload a number of copies for a few minutes, then disconnect and rush off to anoth er phone miles away.

    He said he wanted to get as many copies scattered as widely as possible around the nation before the government could get an injunction and stop him.

    I thought he was being rather paranoid. In light of the following, perhaps he was just being realistic.

  99. May 1981 First mention of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I replied to this thread explaining that we no longer say "Microsoft" but "Micro$oft". Hopefully everyone gets the message

  100. It may take a disaster to learn from the mistakes. by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually miss the early Dejanews interface and search capabilities. It had some arcane limitations, but it was more expressive than what I can do with Google.

    And I don't see evidence that people have largely learned the lesson from when Dejanews went away and Google had not yet brought up Deja's database -- the lesson being that Usenet is of value and Usenet article collections need to be mirrored and kept up to date by multiple independent administrators. Placing all of those metaphorical eggs in one basket is very risky. Doubly ironic when one considers that decentralization is one of the hallmarks of netnews. With all the bright people thinking up ways to host mirrors of files in varied places in P2P networks, I would have imagined someone would have done so for Usenet articles by now.

  101. Earliest use of "fuckhead" in a flame by Legion303 · · Score: 1
  102. eBay announcement by sstidman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One of the posts I found amusing was the announcement of eBay which was apparently originally called "AuctionWeb". I thought this auction was particularly funny:

    Autographed Marky Mark Underwear
    Current bid: $400
    Auction ends on: 09/25/95, 10:09:29 PDT
    Auction started on: 09/11/95, 10:09:29 PDT

    $400?!? Holy crap ... that is some seriously expensive underwear! Why did Marky Mark bother with his music career? He could have simply sold underwear and gotten just as rich.
    --
    Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
    1. Re:eBay announcement by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      One of the posts I found amusing was the announcement of eBay which was apparently originally called "AuctionWeb".

      Apparently nothing, as one of the first users of the service, even before I become a formal member in 1996, eBay had a way different feel in the early days than it does now. It really was a bargain hunter's and hobbist's paradise before eBay got greedy for listing fees and starting adding stuff like "Buy It Now" items and storefronts. Now, the former AuctionWeb's visibility causes many items to be bid above and beyond market value anymore.

      (And before any of you wannabe economists try to correct me on my concept of "market value," what you are thinking of only exists in an aggregate, transparent economy free of perverting influence which eBay no longer is. eBay prices are no longer on the median of the supply curve.)

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  103. who's BIFF? by johansalk · · Score: 1

    it says "early post by BIFF"; who's BIFF?

    1. Re:who's BIFF? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      A kind of stereotypical Usenet lamer, a bit like the kids who use l33t-5p34k these days. See the FOLDOC reference.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:who's BIFF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      B1FF (Note spelling!) is a RILLY K()()L D00D who posts to usenet from his brother's Commodore 64. See this entry from David DeLaney's net.legends FAQ:
      B1FF (HEY D00DZ!1!! THIS IZ K()()L!!1!!):
      extremely unorthodox (but somewhat consistent, and *easily* mimickable)
      typography in his posts (ALL CAPS, I->1, O->0, E->3, etc.) "K00L, DUD3Z!",
      plus much surfer-type slang. B1FF posts from a Commodore C-64, and is a Kool
      Dude who Rilly Knows Net.Stuff. Has many imitators. Remembered semi-fondly by
      millions. Had a girlfriend, Buffy (tee-hee! :-) :-) *giggle*! :-) :-) ),
      [or possibly Muffy; rumors are flying that Muffy has been killed by kibologists
      - I would remind people that Rumors are Treason and make The Computer unHappy;
      have a Nice Day, Citizen...] who would probably blow Phil Gustafson's diodes
      permanently were she to appear on afu... B1FF is *not* Kibo, nor is Kibo B1FF.
      Nu-uh. Nope. B1FF was last seen proclaiming his new account, b1ff@aol.com (an
      obvious forgery, of course - B1FF has no minuscules) and before that, his
      BIFFSTER@DELPHI.COM account (and before *that* on news.groups, quickly
      followed by buffy).
      Of course, the Lameness filter refuses to post this, which really comes as no surprise. Curse you , Kibo, for writing B1FF's posts with so many junk characters!

      Why can't there be a tickbox called "I know there's a lot of junk, but it is needed" to bypass the lameness filter? Oh well, if you want to read the rest of the entry on B1FF, click the link to the net.legends FAQ.
    3. Re:who's BIFF? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      The page is slashdotted? OMG. Pardon me while I turn my useent history webserver off. If you pricks find this I won't be able to get email for a month.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  104. SubGenius by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    I am so happy that they marked the first SubGenius post.

    Incidently, my handle predates the web and was chosen for kibo'esque reasons - I can search for it and find myself.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  105. Google Groups doesn't work by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    That's why I haven't posted for the past few weeks anyway. It reads OK, but whenever I post it says "message XXXX not found" in red so I'm waiting for them to fix that.

  106. How could they have left out ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the dinette set that shook the world?!

    http://tinyurl.com/44lcw

  107. if it ain't broke... by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    ...break it.

    as a sort-of-pointy-hair-type, i find this quite amusing:

    "Are you finding it frustrating when everything works on minix? No more all-nighters to get a nifty program working? "


    so basically, because minix was working just fine - he created a new project just because ;)

    I KNOW I KNOW

  108. Whatever happened to Jon Katz anyway? by Schwarzchild · · Score: 1

    Anyone know?

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    1. Re:Whatever happened to Jon Katz anyway? by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      Jon Katz? Didn't he set us up the bomb?

    2. Re:Whatever happened to Jon Katz anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i saw one of his books at a thrift store

  109. Just released... in 2003 by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Spot down the bottom: ©2003 Google

    Cool, but not new.

  110. As if... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...flogging a dead horse's decomposed and almost dissolved mummified carcass (i.e. OLD) by reusing old jokes doesn't happen in every other story. Here's a suggestion. Read the second newest story on slashdot. Post the same jokes in the newest stories. Seems to work for the humorbots (and no, the 5.0 in futurama was way better) here.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  111. What about a /. version? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    We could have...
    • First Soviet Russia joke
    • First lame FP attempt
    • First Kent Brockman "New Overlords" joke
    • First Beowulf cluster joke
    • First GNAA troll
    • First BSD is dying troll
    I could go on.
    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  112. Uh... No by YowzaTheYuzzum · · Score: 1

    The story is about Google's timeline of Usenet, not about the archive being made available. Yes it's old, but not three years old.

    1. Re:Uh... No by LordOfYourPants · · Score: 1

      According to the Wayback Machine's mirror, the timeline itself has been around since at LEAST December 12, 2001.

  113. Time Tunnel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot reply to the "first Mac rumor" usenet post from 1982. I emplor the slashdot community to help me find a way of posting a warning to the geeks of 1982. We CAN change EVERYTHING!!! Victory!

  114. ALERT! WARNING! NOTE! by Stevyn · · Score: 1
    These sources still need minix-386 to be compiled

    And almost 14 years later, I'm compiling the 2.6.10 kernel.

  115. History by fazookus · · Score: 1

    Too bad CERN doesn't put up a server at the addresses in Berners-Lee's announcement... it would be really cool to be able to go back in time and pull down an historical document from a link in another historical document.

  116. also the world's first broken link (URL)... ;-) by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1

    this one: http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html. (in the WWW announcement)

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    1. Re:also the world's first broken link (URL)... ;-) by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      I tried to go to the site to read about the first broken link but alas, the link was broken.

  117. Mercy Killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His fingers and tongue at some point lacerated his own brain to death to spare themselves the indiginities of the stupidity of communicating like a "Special Olympics" winner.

  118. Kremvax by ozymyx · · Score: 1

    They didn't put in Kremvax - the greatest net hoax ever !!! :-)

    1. Re:Kremvax by Cmdr+TECO · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the page I see has it:
      -------- Apr 1984 The kremvax hoax

      --
      echo 33676832766569823265328479713269.8639857989Pq | dc
    2. Re:Kremvax by ozymyx · · Score: 1

      OK my excuse is lack of coffee :-) I'll go and beat myself over the head with my original hard copy of the Western Digital V7 manual.....

  119. Not this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was about "Lisa", not the Mac.

    Even Steve knew the Lisa was a dumb idea, and that's good enough for me.

    1. Re:Not this time by eshefer · · Score: 1

      reread the post. the name "macintosh" is mentuned there..

  120. What does this mean? by Zane+Edwards · · Score: 1

    Clinton in mentioned and the Bush(s) were not.

  121. hurd by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    gotta love this " I can (well, almost) hear you asking yourselves "why?". Hurd will be out in a year (or two, or next month, who knows)"

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  122. Tim Berners-Lee by Roofus · · Score: 1

    All of the links in Tim Berners-Lee's post are broken! What does that say about the future of the web if its creator can't even keep a link alive?

    I mean, come on, 14 years is nothing! I've got web pages that are still alive from when I put them up over 17 years ago.

    1. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      17 years ago? In 1988? On the web? How? (Do I have enough question marks in this post?)

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  123. sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    01100010 00110001 01101110 00110100 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110011 01110101 01111000 00110000 01110010 01111010

    is all i'm sayin'

  124. Star Wars by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    azure!randals Jun 8 1982, 10:53 pm

    The release date for us humans that want to see it is
    still the summer of 1983. I guess it takes that long to score
    all the music, do all the film-editing, prepare all the promo
    material, and all that junk.

    I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster.
    I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts
    of the Star Wars series.

  125. But they missed ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    ... the fist appearance of the signature virus at Oct. 21, 1991 and its first English version at Oct 30, 1991. After all, it's the oldest virus transmitted through Usenet, although it needed the human brain as alternate host, and did no real damage.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  126. Shock Linus confession! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    From article:

    Oct 1991 Linus Torvalds' Linux announcement

    " This is a program for hackers by a hacker."

    He confesses! SCO note - He is a hacker! Burn him, hes a witch - burn him!

    (Im not a witch, they just stuck a carrot on my nose.. etc..)

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  127. Thread Hijacking by wackysootroom · · Score: 1

    Scumbags are hijacking Linus' Linux announcement thread to advertise their streaming talk radio programs. Classy.

    There were no responses to the announcement until this /. article.

    I'm all for an open usenet but some things are better to be left alone.

  128. See how careful Linus was about copyright? by kt0157 · · Score: 1
    Kind of shows the AdeT institute up. Linus is very careful about copyright on Minux kernel source, the issue of publishing free vs. not free library source, and solicits people to free up their utility source.

    This all WAY before the paranoia on IP, and WAY before Linux emerged as anything other than a hobby.

    K.

  129. Dark History by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    The main problem with Google's archive is (a) It's pretty spotty during certain periods when I've gone looking, and I didn't always get the same result, (b) Even a complete archive of Usenet would leave out many things that happened outside of the small incestuous world of Usenet or ARPANET. (Okay, it's grown a bit over the years.)

    Google's archive is a purty map, but it's missing some details and the map isn't the territory.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  130. Uh... Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The timeline went up at the same time the Archive did. There was a link to it the initial press release, if I recall. So yes, it IS three years old.

  131. Re:who's BIFF?...BIFF was a dig (and a command) by ozymyx · · Score: 1

    He may have been a lame user but the ORIGINAL BIFF was a dog. BIFF was taught to bark when the mail man came so his owners would know. One the of the developers of sendmail (I think it was sendmail - part of the Berkely email system anyway) - owned BIFF. Someone then put something in the csh to look at your email everytime a command finished executing and then print up "You have new mail" if you had new mail. It was called biffing - from BIFF the dog who barked at the mailman. There was a command in BSD 4.0 called biff - biff -y meant tell me when email arrived. I really have to try to forget some of this suff :-) andrew

  132. This is an old list! by FePe · · Score: 1

    This list was first published in 2001 (1981 + 20 years = 2001). Take a look at this: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/11/072721 8&mode=thread

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  133. first premeditated murder on usenet by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Readers of sci.reasearch.careers watched Dr. Fabrikant, an adjucant faculty at Concordia Canada rant and rave about slights by other faculty at the college in 1992. Then they were horrified to read in the general press he killed four of them.

    From the earliest days it was hard to tell how serious people were on usenet. Without the the constraint of face-to-face interaction, it was fairly common for people to be far more emotional than in real life. With all the deception on the net, its hard for other readers to tell how serious a poster is.

    1. Re:first premeditated murder on usenet by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Found the J. Dahlmer post yet?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  134. Green Card Lottery? by jimhill · · Score: 1

    What, no mention of the day Canter & Siegel bombed Usenet with their drek?

    --
    Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    1. Re:Green Card Lottery? by 44BSD · · Score: 1

      First thing I looked for. Very conspicuous by its absence (unless I missed it!).

    2. Re:Green Card Lottery? by Cmdr+TECO · · Score: 1
      --
      echo 33676832766569823265328479713269.8639857989Pq | dc
    3. Re:Green Card Lottery? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      It's there. See "first commercial spam" on the same line as "first mass spamming".

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  135. Oh well, the software thing didn't pan out... by rah1420 · · Score: 1

    Reading in the announcement of the first IBM PC here...

    The big news might be the software -- there's plenty of it. If you don't like their idea of a diskette OS or Pascal compiler or word processor, you can try USCD Pascal or CPM-86, coming soon from Softech and Digital Research. (Gee, and I
    was looking forward to JCL).

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
  136. Bill Clinton link wrong by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

    What's up with the link to Bill Clinton:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=766%40ihuxb.U UCP

    It doesn't seem to go to the right place or am I missing something?

    1. Re:Bill Clinton link wrong by scootr1 · · Score: 1

      He had it removed. It was very disparaging.

  137. This is the Greatest Thing Ever (TM) by fourtwo · · Score: 1

    I'm a young'n, so I got in to the whole computer show a little late. Usenet always seemed so archaic and intimidating, like an ancient library. Now with this little "Where the Stars Live" map of history, I have no reasonable excuse not to explore!

  138. Not breaking news by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 1

    I'm very sure Google posted this page very long time ago -- I remember seeing it a couple of months after Google acquired Deja. Its not breaking news IMHO.

    1. Re:Not breaking news by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 1

      You are quite right, grasshopper. But, at least slashdot waited a little while to dupe the post.

      --
      sig not found
  139. First AOL Post? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Does it include the first AOL poster? That was the day Usenet hit the skids.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:First AOL Post? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Yes. And for exacly that reason.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:First AOL Post? by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      This is the earliest post I could find by what appeared to be a AOL end user. Earlier posts were made via "aolsys.aol.com" which was apparently an internal server used by AOL employees.

      Storm winds begin to blow about here, and the first "symbolic AOLer" post occurs about here or so... or maybe not. The problem with finding such a post is that many users at the time had multiple e-mails and would use a company or school's system to post to USENET, masking their true newbie nature. I couldn't find a stereotypical "@aol.com" originated USENET post in late 1993 in my brief Google-ogical dig, and I can't afford to waster anymore time at work over this.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  140. Re:It may take a disaster to learn from the mistak by mo^ · · Score: 1
    With all the bright people thinking up ways to host mirrors of files in varied places in P2P networks, I would have imagined someone would have done so for Usenet articles by now.


    so... get some space and make a mirror...... or arent you "someone"?
    --
    bah!*@%!
  141. Star Wars post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some dude couldn't believe he'd have to wait until 1997 to see all 9 star wars movies. back then I bet they never thought they'd be punished by the Jar Jar

  142. where is .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the first uuencoded porn ?

  143. Grammar by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    I find it remarkable that everyone knew how to form properly punctuated and capitalized sentences back then. Oh how far we've come.

    - IP

  144. Re:It may take a disaster to learn from the mistak by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
    Placing all of those metaphorical eggs in one basket is very risky. Doubly ironic when one considers that decentralization is one of the hallmarks of netnews.

    It's not so much that they are all in one basket as that not many people thought to archive the entire USENET. At the time, hard drive space was at a premium, and clumsy backups to tape were the only alternative. The only reason Deja/Google exists is through some lucky discovery of backup media.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  145. Spealling by SavoWood · · Score: 1

    Eye theenk there spealling adn grammer whirr beter bak wen thay starrted.

    Seriously, the timeline seems to really start to degrade around the early 90s. The quality of the posts, even the flames, was quite good back in the early days. Nowadays, you'd think the people posting were the monkeys Spaff was writing about.

    --
    Plant a tree in a developing country.
    1. Re:Spealling by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Jane you ignorant slut;

      There's only one "f" in "spaf".

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:Spealling by SavoWood · · Score: 1

      D'oh!!

      I could claim I was doing that on purpose, but I must come clean and take it like a man. =-)

      The worst thing about it is I've corrected other people on that same mistake.

      --
      Plant a tree in a developing country.
  146. It's not as insightful as you might think. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    It's incredibly amazing how much insight the poster of the first "Osama bin Laden" usenet post must have had back in 1993.

    Don't forget that when he wrote that post, the World Trade center had already been bombed by Bin Laden, so everyone could read the writing on the wall. He wasn't an unknown up and coming terrorist leader, he had already struck and was already well known.

  147. I can't find... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    I can't find any of the posts or newsgroups for my computer science classes back in the late '80s/early '90s...some interesting and useful info there; I remember using the first Mozaic(sic) in the CS Lab - and we used elm and pine to read newsgroups and mail to read email via command line. Those were the days.

    One thing that is interesting if you search the archive is that the amount of spam just grows and grows until usenet is useless - and less general purpose as it was back in the day - becoming handfuls of islands of special interest in a sea of spam. I stopped using it, opting instead for special interest bulletin boards - such as slashdot).

    In the early days it was a great communications medium for groups of people; from an archival standpoint it has limited usefulness as it stands (until someone takes the raw data and does a thorough job of indexing it - which given the size of the archive probably won't happen except for small pieces - like this timeline).

    What does the future hold? More message boards, or something more intriguing?

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  148. So when's the funeral? by shanen · · Score: 1
    When I was young and oh-so-naive I thought that together we would make the newsgroups grow and blossom like the sum of human knowledge. Au contraire, the proper image is of an abandoned garden overgrown with weeds. Compare the trolls' and spammers' posts to poison ivy and nettles? Contrary to my youthful fantasies, the only future interest in the newsgroups will be from a few mathematical epistemologists who will use the posts as data in order to analyze certain forms of signal loss. Though no one will look at the actual posts, they will write fine academic articles containing such thrilling snippets as:

    "The graph in Figure 1 illustrates the information death of the newsgroups as evaluated using Equation 4. It covers the interval from the first time when the average SNR for the newsgroups reached zero until the last time it left the positive signal zone. The death of the newsgroups is usually assigned to the second date, in spite of the continued existence of pockets of actual information until early in 2007. In Table 3, we have some of the related demographic information about the Internet user population during this period...."

    They might even include a footnote about the actual shutdown of the last NNTP server. I wonder what the last post will be? However, I'm already certain it will be posted by a troll.

    The big question is actually not when, but what to wear to the funeral. Traditional dark suit and black tie seems too cliche, so I'm leaning towards dressing as a circus clown. (This is actually mostly from a post I wrote in alt.config a few weeks ago.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  149. Re:It may take a disaster to learn from the mistak by rs79 · · Score: 1

    It was by no means luck. A bunch of us knew about Henry's tapes and made sure then ended up somewhere usefull. SDSU and UWO got them from 9 track to DAT. I got Brewster Kahle to put them online and told Deja to grab them. It took 2 years but they did but never made them available in any sane format; Google did that.

    For all the complaints about google keep in mind: where else can you find an article addressable archive of all of useent?

    (Well, most of it, bits and pieces are not there, Henry's tapes were filty and large parts were unreadable)

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  150. Anecdote of academic counter-relevance to success by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    like Bill Gates dropping out of Harvard. Probably a few relatives were dismayed at his lack of perseverance.

    I think these counter-examples are noteworthy not because college ruins future success (I think the evidence is largely the other way), but because a lot of people who don't complete college need some reason for believing that they, too, can be successful. And they can - it's just these people are like lottery winners. They're exceptions to the trend.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  151. wikipedia by twitter · · Score: 1
    Sock Puppets. While they don't say anything about the origin of the term, it seems obvious. They also have a nice talk about trolls which has a sadly flattering summary.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  152. THE Andy Tanenbaum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andy Tanenbaum is THE Andrew S Tanenbaum?

    We study his texts books for Computer Networks like a Bible!!!

    1. Re:THE Andy Tanenbaum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Andy Tanenbaum is THE Andrew S Tanenbaum?


      Yup, same guy.
      He wrote Minix which in various ways inspired Linux. He also had a long discussion on Usenet with Linus Torvalds in which he advocated microkernels instead of a monolithic kernel design like what Linux uses.

  153. "Microsoft needs Wizards" by malakai · · Score: 1

    Microsoft needs Wizards

    Wow, if only I hadn't been 9, and if only I had access to a nntp and uucp.

    1. Re:"Microsoft needs Wizards" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft's been eating all the food lately."

  154. LAST POST, via backtime update: by ankhank · · Score: 1


    I am smarter than meat. They would never pull my plu

  155. What about Al Qaeda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is there no earliest mention of Al Qaeda? Can it really be true it didn't exist until early 2001 when Bush took office as the rumors on the Internet claim?

  156. Fax Machine? 1983?` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they on drugs, it was around since the mid 1800's.

  157. classic by torrents · · Score: 1

    heh some real classics...

    --
    Get your torrents...
  158. What?!?! No Babylon 5 Historical Notes?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And not a word about the Church of Joe!

  159. Strange early gmail post Sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have archived a conversation from the day the plane struck. Some asshole interjected this message. Whats strange is his email address.

    awu...@gmail.com Dec 20 2004, 8:39 pm hide options
    Newsgroups: atl.arno
    From: awu...@gmail.com - Find messages by this author
    Date: 20 Dec 2004 20:39:11 -0800
    Local: Mon, Dec 20 2004 8:39 pm
    Subject: Re: Check CNN
    Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse

    you guys have no idea whats going to happen

  160. The ``First "CD" Reference'' is specious. by steven.coco · · Score: 1

    The post labled as the First Mention of a Compact Disc is in error. The "Disc's" the user is referring to are actually vinyl discs. He's pointing out that analog media exhibit the same shrinking resolution at lower levels as do digital and that the noise floor in analog media is more intrusive. Digital tape -- and hence likely the A/D and D/A's the post is discussing -- has been in use in professional recording studios for a long time -- the 70's. The CD was not introduced until 1985. To keep the 'record' straight. For real digital heads: All television -- good old analog NTSC -- going back a long time has gone through a digital signal processor as a part of broadcast conformance. And most people (being on a PC right now) will gather, the earliest digital technologies go back decades before the 70's and 80's and "the CD". ~This might pose fun research for the interested. Peace, Steev.

    1. Re:The ``First "CD" Reference'' is specious. by GrassyNoel · · Score: 1

      The CD was announced in 1982 by Phillips and Sony. I knew a guy whose folks had a CD player in 1985; they couldn't have been introduced in that year.

      --
      Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
    2. Re:The ``First "CD" Reference'' is specious. by steven.coco · · Score: 1

      You may be right -- I might have that date a little skewed -- but the poster's "Disc" was indeed a vinyl one; this is the message's context.

  161. Re:Anecdote of academic counter-relevance to succe by jskelly · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if I agree. It would seem that
    only 25% of the US population have at least a bachelor's degree. And (to be US-centric -- apologies about that, but I don't know statistics for other countries) it would be reasonable to assume that "some" percentage of them aren't doing well for whatever reason. So then I guess the rest boils down to how does one define "success" (and what percent of people in the US have attained it? And does it correlate at all w/ the higher-ed-grad figures?) Which would be a longer discussion for another time. But my reason for posting was to mention the numbers -- until recently, I really had had no idea that only a quarter of the population held a degree at all. So I sort of wonder how many people who're successful (however it's defined) are telling tales about their qualifications (which isn't even to mention the tales job seekers tell).

  162. my post is offtopic, mea culpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This post of mine is in fact a reply to this post of yours. Apologies for replying here, but for some very funky reason slashdot doesn't allow me to reply in that thread (I'm pretty sure I haven't modded it).

    Anyway, in response to your listed requirements for a cellphone, I wanted to let you know of these resources which have helped me quite a bit:

    The feature search doesn't have a way to specify your first criteria ("simple phone interface"), but it does show pictures of all the phones it returns. In response to your other criteria (SMS, bluetooth, flip phone, pc sync) the feature search returns 15 phones:
    Motorola A630, MPx220, V500, V505, V551, V600, V710
    Nokia 6255, 6260, 6810, 6820, 9500
    Panasonic X70
    Sony Ericsson Z1010, Z600
    Personally I've got my eye on the Nokia 6255, though it doesn't seem to be quite out yet and I want to see if Verizon cripples its bluetooth stack the way they did with the v710.

    Anyway, hope this helps.

    1. Re:my post is offtopic, mea culpa by dcam · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the comments and the links.

      After some consideration I have settled on a replacement phone. After my experience with the Motorola and chatting to quite a few people I decided that the only people who made a relatively simple interface was Nokia. So that limited things a little.

      Out of that I rather like a smaller phone, and don't see the point of PDA features I don't use, so that cuts things down a bit too. I had to give up on the flip phone thing. I like the flip phone form factor for two reasons, it means the phone can't pocket call and it means a larger screen and keys while remaining small. Nokia hasn't understood this yet.

      In the end I settled on a 6230. I also know a couple of people who have them and they both like them a lot, so that counts for something.

      To be totally honest I'd settle for a 3210 that can be synced with a PC so long as I can store a few hundred phone numbers in it.

      --
      meh
    2. Re:my post is offtopic, mea culpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sweet, glad you got a good phone. :)

      btw, I figured out why I couldn't post in the other thread: it's quite old. I have no idea how I ended up reading it recently, but I had no idea of its age at the time.

  163. So Linus' final grade ,,, by Shadowlore · · Score: 1
    From the famous "flame"fest:

    Writing a new OS only for the 386 in 1991 gets you your second 'F' for this term. But if you do real well on the final exam, you can still pass the course.


    So, it is now 2005. Linux has been ported to so many devices it is almost absurd. Doing what got the "F" turned out to be the right thing in terms of project accessibility, use, growth, and so on not to mention portability. No Minix machines are in the supercmoputer list but Linux is.

    So, what should the "final exam" and resulting grade be? ;)

    [insert jovial sarcasm tag here]
    --
    My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.