Slashdot Mirror


Getting the Girl

1up.com has a great article up entitled Getting The Girl. Zoe Flower discusses female gaming stereotypes, the role of women in gaming, and the mythical "girl formula" for gaming success. From the article: "Lara Croft continues to personify an ongoing culture clash over gender, sexuality, empowerment, and objectification. It was while standing in my first-ever ladies' room line at E3 2004 as I pondered the Playboy bunnies, the return of Leisure Suit Larry, and the slew of buxom virtual ladies headlining each booth that I questioned whether the industry had evolved at all."

528 comments

  1. Target Audience by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The biggest market for video games are males aged 12-25. Big breasted women helps sell games to this demographic. That is all.

    1. Re:Target Audience by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That doesn't mean that you should only target your largest audience. Women are still a huge market, even if they're not as large as men, just because the gaming industry is so huge.

      --
      Hey, guys, I'm just pleased as punch to report that it's a fleet of a hundred Vogon Battle Destroyers!
    2. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Big breasted women are used to push everything from cars to toothpaste in the US. is their use to peddle cheap video games a surprise to anyone?

    3. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm an ass man, and i beg to differ.

    4. Re:Target Audience by JayDoggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nit picking: Your numbers are close, but off a bit. For Teen to Mature rated games, your target market is males 17-early 30s.

      Newer market research is proving that as the gaming core is aging, the late 20s are a valuable portion of this market.

      -Game developer doing an M-rated game

    5. Re:Target Audience by fshalor · · Score: 1

      "...largest...huge...large...huge..."

      size matters I guess?

      Some of my best friend/players on line are females.

      Nothing cuter than a girl playing a game seriously. :)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    6. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And let's not forget about all of those big hunky male characters in video games like:

      The Doom Guy
      Serious Sam
      Duke Nukem ...

      I've never heard another male video gamer complain `Duke's arms are too muscular!` or `Look at those pecs, they're unnatural!`.

      They're charactures. It's like complaining that cartoon characters don't look like real people.

    7. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some women I know like to wear boxers to sleep in. Does that mean boxers, who's target audience is men, should also target women?
      I'm not agreeing that the gaming industry should not target women, just there is too many flaws in your theory.

    8. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call that cute. I think the word I would use is "sad".

      Now if you'd said, "there's nothing cuter than a girl shamelessly walking along the dusty streets barefoot," I would be totally in agreement.

    9. Re:Target Audience by smoothee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://gettiffany.com/ has a very simmilar theme and has much the same demographic EXCEPT there is a huge subculture of WOMEN. This makes up about 30-40% of the people on this game. They say it somehow makes them feel empowered to be part of a "man's world."

    10. Re:Target Audience by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And let's not forget about all of those big hunky male characters in video games like:

      The Doom Guy
      Serious Sam
      Duke Nukem ...

      I've never heard another male video gamer complain `Duke's arms are too muscular!` or `Look at those pecs, they're unnatural!`.

      They're charactures. It's like complaining that cartoon characters don't look like real people.


      Well, actually, they are caricatures of what a man's fantasy man would look/act like. So they are still marketing toward male fantasy there. I don't know that anything is really wrong targeting men, but those are poor counterexamples.

    11. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shows what you know about the market. There are just as many women games as guys. However women don't play the same types of games, and for some reason the major studios spend the majority of their time making games targetted towards guys.

    12. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That doesn't mean that you should only target your largest audience. Women are still a huge market

      The question is, do the big breasted women alienate female gamers to the point where the female sales lost outweigh the male sales gained?

      Given the marketing budgets of the average game, I'd be inclined to think that they've done their research and found that it really doesn't alienate them that much.

      Of course, this will be dependent upon the fact that they'll be considering existing female gamers, and not considering how many are put off from gaming altogether by this attitude.

    13. Re:Target Audience by Psmylie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If that's true, then isn't having slender-waisted, large breasted women characters also marketing towards a femal fantasy?
      Hmmm...

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    14. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they do. Not every game has Big Breasted Women in it.

    15. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Interesting point. But I have to ask -- am I the only one here who thinks that girls in boxers = pretty damn sexy?

    16. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foot fetishist, eh?

      My girlfriend lives for video games and I couldn't be happier that we can share them.

      Hell, she even thought Leisure suit larry's latest game (which wasn't anything close to what the old ones were) was funny and enjoyed it (though she didn't enjoy playing it, just watching me do it)

    17. Re:Target Audience by Marvelicious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      THANK YOU!

      I'm sick of hearing about how MEN are responsible for the sexual stereotyping. What about Cosmo and all the other mags dedicated to helping women look as much like the sterotype as possibe?

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    18. Re:Target Audience by gammoth · · Score: 1

      In a word, yes.

    19. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you are. Girls in boxers == guys in panties. IOW deviants.

    20. Re:Target Audience by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Women are more adaptable in that sense. I can not see a man playing a game with men it it which were designed to be sexually attractive to women. It would be a turn off.

      But I can easily see the reverse.

    21. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, not a fetish. I couldn't get off on them exclusively. It's just in the same way some guys like tits, some guys like legs, some guys like ass .. I like feet.

      Back to the point, I think it's probably because Wolfenstein 3D was the peak of my computer gaming orgasm. Modern experiences hold no interest any more, though I do love those little 50-in-1 game joystick full of arcade classics.

      If I went over to my girlfriend's place and she was playing Halo or Half Life or the like, I'd be bored shitless. But then I only get to see her every three weeks or so, so we wouldn't waste time sitting in front of a screen anyway.

    22. Re:Target Audience by fraggirl13 · · Score: 1

      I am one of those rare female gamers. For the most part I don't mind the female characters, but occasionaly I do wish they would be more modest. I was playing Prince of Persia Warrior Within and was discusted by what the characters looked like. who wears iron underwear anyway?

      --
      But, this one goes to 11.
    23. Re:Target Audience by nerdup · · Score: 1

      But the point is that some people are trying to expand this market. If every movie that came out had a girl with short shorts and a big rack would the movie companies just brush it off and say "well that's for our target audience"? No, they would probably try to expand their fare to make it accessible to more people. on a side note, I am a male between 12 and 25 and I would like to see a broader spectrum of female characters in games as well. I find the current lack of realistic representation of women insulting just the same as a woman would... but because of what it says about game designers' ideas of my maturity level and interests. Just because I'm a man doesn't mean that my interest can only be held by boobies and thongs.

    24. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "We're our own worst enemies, but I still blame men" - Janeane Garofalo

      The simple truth is that, though female characters in games like DOA are grossly exaggerated, there will never be many games where the lead character doesn't fit into some sort of sexual feminine/masculine ideal. Nobody wants to play a fat guy or an ugly gal.

    25. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is, since when were boxers really targeted at men? Think about it. It's not like theres some external anatomical feature that makes them not fit properly on women (thats to you, mr AC who called women in boxers "deviants"). The only "mens" feature that they have really is the slit up the front, and half of them don't even have that.

    26. Re:Target Audience by MynockGuano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whether you realize it or not, most games DO have male leads which are designed to be attractive. There are many more Duke Nukems and Gordon Freemans out there with big hulking muscles and/or suave good looks than there are Leisure Suit Larrys. I mean, if you're creating anything artificially, why not make it look good (a la the movie industry)? In fact, when it comes to computers, it's actually magnitudes easier to do it that way.

    27. Re:Target Audience by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Big breasted women are used to push everything from cars to toothpaste in the US.

      That makes for a nice soundbite, but is it true? Can you cite any recent advertising for cars or toothpaste that actually use large breasts as a sales tactic?

    28. Re:Target Audience by Olix · · Score: 1

      I agree - from the little knowledge of women I have (Steming from Elaynes dreams in The Wheel or Time) the big violent muscley type is not so attractive. If they made a game where the lead character is a sensitive chap who is prone to stopping and... thinking about stuff... rather that just nuking another demon, that would be a character targeted at a female audience. Hell, I don't know. Can't we have a womans opinion? There must be atleast one on Slashdot...

    29. Re:Target Audience by Lindsay+Lohan · · Score: 1
      Big breasted women helps sell games to this demographic
      No, that is not all...

      Who will sell games to us big-breasted girls, that's the real question.

      I like bubbles.
    30. Re:Target Audience by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      There are entire websites devoted to Impractical Armor. >8)

    31. Re:Target Audience by Olix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of my Real Life female friends are gamers. I got really shocked the first time one of them mentioned playing UT2004 online. Then I felt realy guilty. Still can't temp any into coming to a Lan party. I guess hanging around with a load of sweaty Blokes for a weekend is not their cup of tea, for some reason.

    32. Re:Target Audience by crashfrog · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean that you should only target your largest audience.

      Indeed, and I don't think they do. I mean, I don't find too many gender stereotypes in World of Warcraft, for instance. In fact my wife complains about how heavyset the human female characters seem to be.

      So there's plenty of games with gender-neutral appeal. Has the industry evolved? Sure - it's evolved to the same place TV and movies have. Evolution doesn't mean leaving behind successful strategies, and sex appeal sells some kinds of games. But there's plenty of other games.

      --
      I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
      If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
    33. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm a guy gamer, and I'm turned off by scanty clothes. When I'm playing a game, I want to throw down, I don't want to look at T&A. I loved the gameplay of Tomb Raider, but my favorite levels were the ones in which she was wearing regular clothes (like the arctic levels). And, I like the game "Ghost in the Shell" but I wish they didn't stick that thong/tights combo on her. At least it was more modest than the series, I guess that's something.

      Why can't they put realistic clothes on the characters? A female super-cop would be wearing a loose-fitting, comfortable jumpsuit and body armor, not a thong over tights. I mean, really.

      For me, any overt sexuality ruins a game. Or at least, lowers its value a bit. It's just an annoying distraction.

    34. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Can you cite any recent advertising for cars or toothpaste that actually use large breasts as a sales tactic?
      Big breasted maybe or maybe not (I honestly don't recall the following examples' breasts, though they were both hot). I recall some Ford or such truck commercial with a hot short-shorted, scantily-clad woman crying about some silly thing or another (the crying was at the very end of the commercial). I don't recall breasts, but she was definitely using her sex appeal to sell. Additionally, there's a Crest commercial (IIRC) that uses a hot, scantily-clad CSI chick to hawk their wares. Also definitely using sex appeal to boost attention to their wares. Again, I don't recall the breasts, but I seem to vaguely be aware of them not being small on CSI.

      There you go: cars and toothpaste, though no hooters... :)

    35. Re:Target Audience by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend spends about 90% more time than me playing. In fact, almost every girl that I know is a more avid player than most of my guys friends.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    36. Re:Target Audience by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Go to a book store, and look at every car magazine.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    37. Re:Target Audience by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Yep. Because all the female players I've known who play Quake, etc. all talk about playing to watch their character's pecs flex while they play.

    38. Re:Target Audience by qurk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Should game designers put an option in their "options" menu for "sex of player" then?

      And would most women want a small-breasted woman on the computer screen?

      Personally I think small-breasted woman are fine (as long as they are my age, 25-30). Big boobs are great, but overrated perhaps? Come on!!!

      Big boobed girl - "duh like totally want to go to the mall"

      Small-boobed girl - "whoa lets play 100 more rounds of KOF 2002 and then we will know who kicks ass!"

      Uh......it's not hard to choose, guys.

    39. Re:Target Audience by superpuppy · · Score: 1
      I just have to point out that you claim your total knowledge of women comes from a book written by a man. :D

      Nonetheless, yes, women definitely wish men would stop and think more often before nuking things. Especially when the things happen to be the dishwasher or the car and the nuking results from an attempt to "fix" that required excessive force...

      I love computer games and I love being a woman. Frankly, big boobs get in the way physically as well as socially. Some realistic body types of both genders would be much more attractive to me than the average 13-year-old fantasy bimbos that most games come stocked with. In the end though it boils down to gameplay and community. Addictive gameplay and a strong community wins for me every time.

      --

      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

    40. Re:Target Audience by qurk · · Score: 1
      Look at the women in T.V. advertisements. Those aren't real people or real women, they were hired to do the advertisement :P :)

      On a side note, who wants a stuck up girl like the ones portrayed on Network T.V. Come on.

      I really want a woman driving the huge S.U.V. I bought her cutting off people and believing she owns the whole road just because she is willing to have my children. HAHAHAHA (Sarcastic off)

    41. Re:Target Audience by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its a catch 22 situation at the moment. Games are made for boys, boys buy games, developers make more games for boys.

      I beg to differ about women being a large market, they are actually a very small market. Lots of women play videogames but how many actually buy them ?. Most women who play videogames only do so because they have access to them through a male in their life (boyfriend, brother, father). How many of these would actually be willing to plonk down the money required for a console and buy games regularly ?.

      Boys are willing to spend large on a console and buy games fairly regularly, developers would be insane to ignore the way the market works.

      I do think that girls are getting more into games though, witness britney's dance game and the karaoke games. More importantly games are starting to have a larger cultural impact, GTA San Andreas my be a strange example to cite considering the violence level but everyone (girls and boys) of a certain age (that 12 - 25 demographic) has heard of this game. It's cool cause its got gangster themes and hip hop influences. Games will get more and more mainstream and will eventually be just like movies (IMHO).

    42. Re:Target Audience by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Ah, it works both ways, that (and for both sexes btw). In slashdot terms:

      Step 1: Sexual stereotyping
      Step 2: Popular idealised image of the perfect body
      Step 3: Feelings of inadequacy, low self-esteem
      Step 4: ???
      Step 5: Profit!!!

      Where Step 4 is usually defined as: advertise (expensive) methods of addressing the issues in step 3, in order to get closer to the image in Step 2... these usually involve selling magazines, overpriced gym subscriptions, kewl clothes and plastic surgery....

      Step 5 really is defined as 'profit', though.

      So actually the situation is an iterative loopy thing, only now Step 1 is fed by the magazines as much or more than from any guys' input. So the situation is responsible for the sexual stereotyping, although those who want to go back to step 0 probably would find that men started it (but does it matter? Particularly since men are now increasingly caught in exactly the same situation).

    43. Re:Target Audience by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      males aged 12-25. Big breasted women helps sell games to this demographic. That is all.

      Especially with a fractal boob-jubbling algorithm!

    44. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for those of us guys who DON'T like big-breasted women. In fact, most of my guy friends don't (and yes, I'm over 20 thank you).

      A C-cup is about the max for me. Anything else is too much.

    45. Re:Target Audience by Rei · · Score: 1

      > Does that mean boxers, who's target audience
      > is men, should also target women?

      Yes. If there's a market, target it and sell to it. It's pretty basic. No business should ignore a significant potential revenue stream.

      --
      Hey, guys, I'm just pleased as punch to report that it's a fleet of a hundred Vogon Battle Destroyers!
    46. Re:Target Audience by IsoRashi · · Score: 1

      My younger sister purchased WoW because she couldn't stand to share with her husband and wait her turn to play. She then purchased a new video card because her comp just didn't perform satisfactorily. When I originally put her computer together a couple years back, her main question was, "But will it play Warcraft 3??" I also bought her a GC for her graduation present and she's bought 3 or 4 games to go with it since then.

      My older sister is a slightly different story. She upgraded her comp way back to play Diablo 2, but she's a working single mom who's also going to school to finish up her degree. She plays her kid's games and she's interested in playing WoW but just doesn't have the time--if she did then she'd definitely be on board.

      I've never met anyone who played that britney game; both my sisters and all my female friends love DDR though. I thought it was playing with other people that they enjoyed, but my younger sister will play on her own sometimes. It seems to me that women tend towards the games which have some sort of social aspect to them, whether that be wholely virtual (The Sims) or quasi-real (WoW).

      Myself, I'm not willing to plonk down a wad of cash on the newest console, and I'm discriminating in what games I purchase. I own a PS2 and maybe a half-dozen games for it. I guess we're not exactly the typical family when it comes to games? :D

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    47. Re:Target Audience by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Go to a book store, and look at every car magazine.

      I guess I'm not the target audience - when I read a wheel ad, I want to know how much the thing weighs, not some half dressed tart. That's what skin mags are for.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    48. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I play with my Wife and she also plays alone. The games she plays alone have nothing related to hunky males. No, characters she likes are for example animals in Zoo Tycoon.

      The games we play together involve games like Diablo II (she likes very much to search the boxes and other similar hideouts for new cool stuff) or Age Of Empires III (she prefers if she can be alone in an island, or if I guard her while she gathers goods for our team.)

      Please note that Diablo and Age of Empires are both clearly targeted for male players, killing and war strategy. Yet she has been able to find something that interest her in those games. I wonder how many females there are who have not experienced the joy of game, because they don't dare to try.

    49. Re:Target Audience by Stellaaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here I am! (One of the 3% of female /.ers)

      Loved the old side scrolling Duke Nukem. Can't say I ever felt any attraction to him. On the whole, FPS bore me to tears - I played original Wolfenstien back in what? 1993/4? and have never really cared for any since - Doom Quake whatever just more of the same.

      The game I have played the most, in all its forms, is Civilization. No large-breasted women or body-builder guys. The game I have played additively since I got it for Christmas is Sid Meier's Pirates! (Sid is GOD-did I mention that?)

      Pirates! does feature a variety of large breasted women in those 18th century corsets that just make the ole boobs pop right out. I don't find them the least attractive (despite rumours to the contrary I am not a lesbian) but I must admit (shhhhh- don't tell anybody) I find my handsome young swashbuckler character strangely attractive. It's not his Arnie-like build (he is quite skinny actually), or that he stops and thinks about stuff (I do that for him). I think it's the pony-tail and tall boots. Or maybe the way he handles his sword ;-) Arrrrrrrrr. Shiver me timbers.

      Stella

    50. Re:Target Audience by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This is only an American sensibilty. The ability to effectively destroy the military enemy du jour is not impeded by the fact that you are sexually appealing to the opposite gender.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    51. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could it be that Cosmo exists because women feel they are forced to adhear to sexual sterotypes created by men?

    52. Re:Target Audience by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I said the female market was small not non existant.

      Surely you must admit that broadly speaking boys buy more games than girls ?.

    53. Re:Target Audience by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok, im not female but ive done quite a bit of research in the field, odd as that is

      little statistics coursework on female views on the male form, turns out that its also a good way to meet girls :) had a questionaire-type thing associating females views of the "perfect" male and female bodies using magazine covers for examples.

      girls tend to like the bodies of guys on the fron of 'mens health' or 'mens fitness' as opposed to 'muscle and fitness' or 'extreme body' type mags. "swimmers body" is the most often heard expression, watch the olympics, youll get the idea.

      though as with most things views vary, some of the girls with the most typical views of a female body had extreme views on men.

      there are women out there who find "big violent muscley type" men most attractive, though they are few and far between. most women are put off by it.

      another survery (carried out on a decent sized sample, not resticted to a sample of a few hundred like mine) found that womens and mens views on muscle varied by about 5-10kg (11-22 pounds). that is, a man thought he looked best with 5-10kg more muscle than a woman thought he looked ideal with. slight simplification.

      but yeh...

    54. Re:Target Audience by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Which means jack-shit. I can use that same-illogic to say that because I only know two smart black people (personally), that must mean that black people are dumb. It makes no sense!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    55. Re:Target Audience by Marvelicious · · Score: 3, Interesting

      sexual stereotypes created by men

      Sit on a bench in a mall for a couple hours sometime. You will notice that women dress almost in uniform by age group. I'm sure no man decided all women should do that "streaked" hair thing, but In my area 75 percent of women in their 20's have it.

      I'm sorry, but people have to take responsibility for their own actions. If you dress a certain way, it's your choice. If you let advertising or stereotypes influence that, it's your choice to do so. If you think you need to lose weight because of some perceived stereotype, go ahead - after all anorexia and bulimia aren't a drop in the bucket compared to obesity in this country, and the majority of us could stand to lose a couple pounds. Doesn't matter to me, I'll still be in sandals, levis and an aloha shirt with long hair. Every few years or so, I'm accidentally fashionable!

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    56. Re:Target Audience by IsoRashi · · Score: 1

      Granted. I was just showing examples of women who took the initiative to game on their own. Women who *do* pay for games rather than just use someone else's purchases.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    57. Re:Target Audience by kjots · · Score: 1
      Look at the women in T.V. advertisements. Those aren't real people or real women, they were hired to do the advertisement :P :)

      So what are they then? Robots? Pod people? Or are they just very good looking women who know they can get paid a tonne of cash just for being very good looking women?

    58. Re:Target Audience by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Sure its a nice story but its anecdotal. The exception that proves the rule shall we say.

    59. Re:Target Audience by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      The biggest market for video games are males aged 12-25. Big breasted women helps sell games to this demographic. That is all.

      Had you considered that males 12-25 year olds make up the biggest market in a large part because that's who games are targetted for? Females aged 12-25 are about as large a potential market (just witness the effectiveness of various popular "music" campaigns targetted at such audiences, or likewise films), there simply aren't very many games that currently interest them to quite the same degree. This is not necessarily because they are not interested in computer games at all... they are simply not as interested in the current crop of games. If all the films were nothing but mass market drivel for 15 year old boys (they way most games are) you'd be claiming girls aren't interested in movies.

      The truth is that games are a fairly new medium really, and game makers have found an early market and are tapping it as much as they can possibly manage. Eventually games, in general, will evolve, grow, and become more interestin to a much broader demographic. Current games are a long way from that however.

      Jedidiah.

    60. Re:Target Audience by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      My 11-year-old daughter, and my friends' 9- and 12-year-old daughters, and all their friends, are video game fanatics. They not only pester their parents to buy them games and equipment, they save up their money and spend most of it on ... you guessed it ... games and game equipment. I don't see any difference between the sexes in how kids that age think about games, and I don't see any reason to think that will change when they get older.

      There really is a generational difference at work here. When I was a teenager in the 80's, video gaming was largely a boy thing and largely a geek thing -- and being a geek, or at least an electronics geek, was of course largely a boy thing itself. It seems to me that all of this has changed dramatically.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    61. Re:Target Audience by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      " If that's true, then isn't having slender-waisted, large breasted women characters also marketing towards a femal fantasy?
      Hmmm..."


      No, of course not.

      They'll tell you that they don't want to look like that, and they think it's wrong to promote that stereotype. Then, they'll go off and spend thousands of dollars to get breast implants and liposuction to fulfill their secret fantasy of looking like what they just got done telling you they DIDN'T want to look like.

    62. Re:Target Audience by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I avoided the Warrior Within when I saw that it was targeted at people that didn't like the first game. I guess the character design was similar in deviation.

      The princess from the Prince of Persia: Sands of Time was great. Competent, not immodestly dressed, saved the hero's ass as much as she needed to be saved.

      Also, the article mentioned it, but I'll never tire of plugging it: Beyond Good and Evil had a great female lead, and was a great game. She was attractive (to me at least) while wearing quite practical clothing and was generaly cool; the game itself was Zelda-like gameplay only better.

      It's too bad the game didn't sell well so there probably won't be a sequel. Then again, both PoP and BG&E were made by Ubisoft; if Warrior Within is an example of what they do with a sequel, maybe it's just as well.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    63. Re:Target Audience by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not necessarily the size of the breasts that bother me. I have large breasts (and shock horror! I'm blonde!), and I don't consider myself particularly empty-headed.

      What bother me, is the lack of proportion between the breasts and the hips. If my hips were a size 0 with the chest that I have now, I'd fall over!

      Small breasts, large breast. I don't care. Just make the bodies a little more real.

    64. Re:Target Audience by fitten · · Score: 1

      I'm a guy. When I get a game, I may look at the T&A for a few minutes, but after I get into the game, I could care less what the model was. Most of the time, I'm playing in first-person view anyway so I can't even see myself. I could just be a square sliding around on the screen for all I care. If the game isn't fun, even having pr0n women in it won't save it.

    65. Re:Target Audience by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I beg to differ about women being a large market, they are actually a very small market. Lots of women play videogames but how many actually buy them ?. Most women who play videogames only do so because they have access to them through a male in their life (boyfriend, brother, father). How many of these would actually be willing to plonk down the money required for a console and buy games regularly ?

      Next you'll be saying we don't know how to code, and we're merely vessels for the opposite gender to dump sperm in. I own an original Gameboy, a SNES, an N64, a PS-One, a Gamecube and a GBA SP. I'm a Nintendo fan. I bought every one of those consoles myself. There might not be many girl gamers out there, but we're certainly not dependant on the male population to provide us with our games.

      I do think that girls are getting more into games though, witness britney's dance game and the karaoke games.

      Oh please. Because we don't play Final Fantasy, or hold 50% of the market for The Sims. We don't know how to play FPS, or RPG's, and god forbid, we couldn't possibly understand MMORPG's. But hell, you're a Slashdot poster. You probably don't even know what a girl looks like.
    66. Re:Target Audience by losec · · Score: 1

      I've never heard another male video gamer complain `Duke's arms are too muscular!
      Well, maybe that is because we havn't seen them yet.

    67. Re:Target Audience by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      The question is, since when were boxers really targeted at men? Think about it. It's not like theres some external anatomical feature that makes them not fit properly on women

      There are "external anatomical features" that makes tight-fitting underwear unpleasant for men. Women do not have these features. Thus, men have a specific reason to want boxers instead, while women do not. Since all men have a reason to perfer boxers, while women have no particular reason to care, it makes sense that men would be the "traget audience".
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    68. Re:Target Audience by TrentTheWiseA · · Score: 1

      Aaaughh,.. (Drool). Marry me!

    69. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess, but could you imagine the lead character of Doom as a scrawny, pale-skinned geek with glasses? Usually male characters are muscular because they are doing physically intense work, but how does a chick with big honking tits fit into any game, like Lara Croft? Could you imagine a woman with a body like that joining the army or something? Doesn't happen.

    70. Re:Target Audience by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I mentioned games like the britney one and karaoake/dance games because these are games that seem to be entirely directed at women. Your right, the sims is a good example of a game that a women might buy for herself instead of for a man in her life, and although I don't much care for it myself, it is critically praised (unlike leisure suit larry, etc.).

      The rest of your post is completely anecdotal, your a woman and you buy games, this doesn't change the fact that the majority of game purchases are by men (or male driven, mothers buying a game for her son for example).

      The fact remains that the games that I like tend to be very violent (i'm a FPS junkie), not very mainstream (in terms of soceity as a whole) and not many women play them. The fact that your a nintendo fan supports my position as they are kid and girl friendly. For the record I don't play games to ogle virtual women, although thats probably be more healthy than playing lots of violent games.

      Also I never questioned womens ability to play games just their will to do so.

    71. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Could it be that a person who adheres to a sexual stereotype for any reason is stupid?

    72. Re:Target Audience by EvilAlien · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Please step away from the crackpipe... Gordon Freeman was a scrawny physicist, not a brawny asskicker. He had to put on an HEV suit just to scrap through the kind of hazards that Duke Nukem would have done in a torn tank top, the guy from Far Cry would have battled through in a hawaiian shirt, and Lara Croft would have... mmmmm Lara Croft... Boobies...

      Which brings to mind the real question left unanswered (perhaps since I don't care to RTFA)... is Zoe Flowers hot? Millions of gamers want to know. A good portion of the girlgamers I know want to know too. Plz advise & send pics... thnx.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    73. Re:Target Audience by lpret · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because women are being told that they don't matter that women don't buy into games? If you can create opportunities to increase your sales by simply creating gender options in games (nothing more than changing some game play and skins) than it seems to me that any business worth it's beans would do so.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    74. Re:Target Audience by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      "I mentioned games like the britney one and karaoake/dance games because these are games that seem to be entirely directed at women.

      The Britney game is targeted at her fans, not at women in general. Those kinds of games are bundled with consoles, and generally don't make a great impact on the gaming world as a whole. Just because they package the game for a sickly sweet vagina world, it doesn't mean to say that we're going to be buying it.

      Your right, the sims is a good example of a game that a women might buy for herself instead of for a man in her life, and although I don't much care for it myself, it is critically praised (unlike leisure suit larry, etc.)."

      Oh, so you'll recognise that we have purchasing ability, but you can't quite admit that we have the fortitude to pick up anything serious? Pft.

      The rest of your post is completely anecdotal, your a woman and you buy games, this doesn't change the fact that the majority of game purchases are by men (or male driven, mothers buying a game for her son for example).

      You're ignoring my point. You said that we only play games when it's defined by a male (ie : research, networks and purchasing power). I was giving you a very real example that proved otherwise.

      Yes, there aren't many female gamers. We all know that. But don't sit there and act like we're this submissive gender who have no ability to involve ourselves in gaming culture without the help of the nearest walking penis.

    75. Re:Target Audience by qurk · · Score: 1
      Don't ask me. I am frankly amazed by the size of the FEET. I am bewildered when I meet a woman and her feet are like 1/3 of the size of mine. After we know each other for a few weeks I gain the courage to ask her if she has any trouble maintaining balance...or if she falls down a lot. Invariably the answer is they have no problem. I am bewildered.

      That said I have nothing against more REALISTIC women in video games :) I think you may be on to something...it's not all about the boobs!!!

      There are a lot of games where you have to chose m or f at the beginning and it makes a big difference in the game. That's called replay value :) Star Ocean 2 is like this, I haven't played 1 or 3.

      O.K. There may not be a LOT of games but I know I can come up with a few more but not real quick right now :)

    76. Re:Target Audience by Webtommy88 · · Score: 1

      Ummmm sex sold then, sex sells now.

      What the hell did she want?

    77. Re:Target Audience by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      > Some of my best friend/players on line are females.

      I'd be more careful with a statement like that, remember, online the men are men, the women are men, and the 10 year-old boys are FBI agents.
      [Shamelessly paraphrased bash quote]

    78. Re:Target Audience by aero2600-5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Some of my best friend/players on line are females.

      Nothing cuter than a girl playing a game seriously. :)
      "

      I'm hoping you realize that online games and MMORPGs have just as many men posing as women as there are actually women playing. Unless you've met her in person, it may be 'Bob' that you're flirting with. Seriously.

      Personally, as a hetero male, I found it incredibly amusing to play a lesbian female in a MMORPG. The game had lost it's 'replay value' until I decided to play as a lesbian. Too funny. Sad thing is, I had more girlfriends in the game as a lesbian than I did as a straight male. Too sad.. Let's hope they were actually women.

      I'm thinking this post should be anonymous, but, who cares.. it was funny..

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    79. Re:Target Audience by qurk · · Score: 1
      O.K. they are real women :)

      Not robots or pod people!

      But just not typical, I mean I know there are lots of women like that but it's not entirely truthful advertising... I get excited when on the few times I am watching T.V. (usually during a football game) and there is a small-breasted woman...it's like WHOA. Hey I have nothing against big boobs it's just like the advertisers seem to be a little biased, not entirely fairly either. Boobs are good man :) Big, small, medium, bouncy, solid, whatever.

    80. Re:Target Audience by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      The biggest market for computer games is *over* 25 years of age, not under.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    81. Re:Target Audience by qurk · · Score: 1

      Another American thing? Shaved armpits? I guess here in the states it is considered gross but if a beutiful woman doens't want to or doesn't have the time to shave the pits.... Hell I don't care. WTF? I mean I don't shave mine. But EVERY woman in the states does, mostly. It's all good. Shave it if you want to I guess. I know if I ever get married she will probably be ordering me around and making me do stuff anyways, who am I to tell any woman to shave her armpits.

    82. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STELAAAAAAAHHHHH!!

    83. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh, no. We need to put more realism into our games, and make Star Jones the chainmail bikini-clad postergirl for the latest fantasy RPG.

      I can hear the product flying off the shelves right now!

    84. Re:Target Audience by IsoRashi · · Score: 1

      I never claimed it wasn't anecdotal, just like I never claimed you said the female market was non-existant. But either way, I think you underestimate the female market. Just because a large portion of games are geared towards guys doesn't mean there aren't women who enjoy gaming, or women who are willing to pay money for a quality, entertaining game. Look at what happened with The Sims. Look at how many women play MMORPGs. I could go on with stories of more women who game and pay for it on their own rather than piggy-backing on someone else's purchases, but it's time to go home :D I think you not seeing women as a big market might be partly due to your FPS-centric gaming. *shrug* In 8 years of online play I've met a total of 2 female FPS players.

      I think Miss_Saturnine says it pretty well.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    85. Re:Target Audience by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that the number of female gamers isn't increasing, I just questioned the relevance of mentioning it.

      While we are sharing, my sister plays games but until a couple of years ago she had never bought a game (she likes the sims now), when we were little she used to play on my nintendo and today she plays on her boyfriends pc.

      Not that its really relevant when talking about the market as a whole and the demogrpahics involved.

    86. Re:Target Audience by mrogers · · Score: 1

      It could be, but unless you have a reason for assuming that only men create sexual stereotypes, Occam's razor says you shouldn't. As far as I can see, most men and most women enforce, and adhere to, sexual stereotypes.

    87. Re:Target Audience by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Yes, there aren't many female gamers. We all know that. But don't sit there and act like we're this submissive gender who have no ability to involve ourselves in gaming culture without the help of the nearest walking penis.

      I have no idea what your point is. I was describing the situation as it is, that most (not all) women don't buy games and if they play them at all they play games that belong to men that they know. I made no comment on whether this is a good situation or a bad one.

      Judging by the lack of female gamers (which you admit to) it is reasonable to assume that most games available dont appeal much to women (or at the very least they appeal much more to men than women). There is another possibility though which is that games in general dont appeal to women (in the same way that most women dont take too much of an interest in sport).

      Even in film, the most successful medium ever, there is sometimes a clear difference between the tastes of two sexes (rom coms, which i cant stand, and action movies I find fun). It makes sense to assume that there will always be this difference with games as well (and everywhere else in life). However I belive that the game industry will develop like the film industry and there will be games that not only appeal to women but transcend the sex barrier.

      Whether you want to admit it or not but the vast majority of games to day are made for men. I am not trying to belittle your intrest in them but you are a minority, so don't be upset when boys wonder why most women don't like games.

    88. Re:Target Audience by mrogers · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I've never heard of anyone playing Tomb Raider to see Lara's breasts bounce, despite a lot of journalistic innuendo to the contrary. Journalists seem to be more interested than gamers are in the sexuality of the characters, perhaps because the journalists' view of games is more superficial.

    89. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree, lately I've been playing a mmorpg and half of the people I became friends there are women, and only one has a boyfriend that plays the same game (I never asked who got into the game first, but he does seem a bit more hardcore than her). I love playing with women (no pun intended), on average they're less childish than men and don't do so much stupid stuff online just 'because I can'.

    90. Re:Target Audience by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      To be honest, I've never heard of anyone playing Tomb Raider to see Lara's breasts bounce, despite a lot of journalistic innuendo to the contrary.


      I've talked to people who have chosen female avatars for alterior reasons.
    91. Re:Target Audience by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean that you should only target your largest audience. Women are still a huge market, even if they're not as large as men, just because the gaming industry is so huge.

      Uhh... Have you ever seen a Cosmopolitan magazine? You think they would sell those if all the chicks in them weren't physically perfect super-models? Women WANT to see nice-looking, large-breasted women. Just, you know, not the current context game designers place them in.

      Girl reading Cosmo:"Hey, this fat chick gives GREAT makeup advice!"

      On another, more offtopic note, who here has seen the Fragdoll's Gallery page?
      See the ugly one? Me neither...
      I find it hard to believe that all girl gamers are drop dead gorgeous...

    92. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Women are still a huge market, even if they're not as large as men"

      Actually the computer females I know tend to be quite a bit larger than the skinny computer-geek males I know. They ARE a larger market if you go by poundage...

    93. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. I do the same thing. Well, I don't use sandals, levis or aloha shirts, I also don't have long hair; I prefer barefoot or running shoes, comfortable pants (any kind, jeans aren't comfy enough for me), and shirts or tshirts (anything that'll keep the right temperature), I have very short hair for the simple reason I don't like to comb it. I shower, grab any clothes that fit the current weather (I dress all in black, I never have to worry about matching colours heh), and go out.
      I find being fashionable a bit irritating, though, they ask me about goths and darkies and such, and I have to explain that I'm not into whatever that is.

    94. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we wanted real bodies, we'd date the fat women we know. Video game art is an ideal, not a reflection of reality...

      No need to get upset over it. After all, you're real, and Lara Croft is just a bunch of pixels. With... big... breasteses!

    95. Re:Target Audience by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Made by Boys."

    96. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Next you'll be saying we don't know how to code, and we're merely vessels for the opposite gender to dump sperm in.

      Not merely just vessels for the opposite gender to dump sperm in, but also kitchen operators, baby raisers, and occasionally trophies that are adorned in elaborate and uncomfortable dress to be paraded about in public.

    97. Re:Target Audience by beakerMeep · · Score: 1
      The funny thing is it's the proportion that is important in attractiveness and these character designers seem to have got the proportion VERY, VERY wrong. This is why to me, these busty game babes look more like plastic Hollowood nastiness.

      There is a certain ratio that men find attractive universally. There was a whole show about it on TechTV like a year ago called Body Hits. Very interesting stuff. They conducted a research study and found this out. Some of the other things they found that are universally accepted beauty (arcoss cultures I mean) are health and youth.

      So as a male who is a fan of the female anatomy I'll have to say I couldn't agree more with you :)

      --
      meep
    98. Re:Target Audience by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Yeah - when I turned 26, I didn't care about titties anymore. I became less fond of titties and found them to be nothing more than chauvenistic symbolism of an over marketed stereotype. Instead my interests turned to more mature things such as metamucil, dentures and Depends. At 27 I began studying grassy knolls for my burial plot. I also purchased life insurance, and aquired a taste for prunes. That game industry has got it all figured out.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    99. Re:Target Audience by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 1

      Have any of you (guys presumably) played Dead or Alive? I swear to god that is the most horrible, pointless, and retarded game ever.

      On the other hand, it sold relatively well. And it did grab my attention for a considerable amount of time...

      --
      Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
      "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
    100. Re:Target Audience by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2

      There's another side to this:

      Could it be that over-muscled male characters exist because men feel they are forced to adhere to sexual stereotypes created by women?

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    101. Re:Target Audience by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that because my girlfriend, who is never overly impressed with the generic large breasted game characters, but tolerates my love of them :) loves Ivy from Soul Calibur. Her primary reason other than her attitude is because while she has huge breasts, she has a 'large bum' and a standard body size that would go with such large breasts. Unlike say, Taki, who perfectly fits the 'massive boobs and small hips' stereotype. She actually plays as Ivy and learns all her moves and doesn't mind my Ivy tshirt and everything, all because while she still perpetuates the sterotype, she has the butt to match the rack. So it's actually okay for me to think she is hot :)

    102. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Cosmo and all the other mags dedicated to helping women look as much like the sterotype as possibe?

      So, uh... read a lot of Cosmo, do you?

    103. Re:Target Audience by Zigbigadoorlue · · Score: 1

      The issue hear should not be one of profit but an ethical problem. It is immoral to unfairly sexualize and objectify woman weather or not it is good for sails. Just because it is more profitable to outsource or use sweet shops for cheep labor doesn't mean commerce should be perused in that fashion. Likewise game companies should make real looking woman not vague resemblances of idealized Britney Speers models.

      Of course this has been a problem with all modern pop cloture icons from Us magazine to MTV it will be no different for EA or Blizzard.

    104. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me get this straight. The target audience hasn't "evolved" but there are more women than before...
      I guess that means lesbians like games too.

    105. Re:Target Audience by IsoRashi · · Score: 1

      The relevance of mentioning it was in showing that women are not something to be discounted. I quote:

      "Lots of women play videogames but how many actually buy them ?. Most women who play videogames only do so because they have access to them through a male in their life (boyfriend, brother, father). How many of these would actually be willing to plonk down the money required for a console and buy games regularly ?."

      Their influence is growing; it's a modern world, man. Coincidentally, my older sister had the atari 2600 and some games on our old TI--I played with both. My younger sister had the gameboy and sega genesis--I played with both. I had the NES and SNES, but only I bothered with them. Who played with whose toys here?

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    106. Re:Target Audience by dasunt · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean that you should only target your largest audience. Women are still a huge market, even if they're not as large as men, just because the gaming industry is so huge.

      Women may be a large demographic, but they are not a large gamer's market.

      Therefore, a lot more game companies appeal to men than to women.

      To use a different example, look at the typical book rack: most places have a huge selection of romance novels. There are book companies who specialize in romance novels, who only sell romance novels. Yet we don't run around screaming that women are uncultured, medieval thinkers just because of the huge market for romance novels. Novels which portray men as unrealistically as most games portray women.

      Now, there are some damn fun games for both genders, as there are some damn good books for both genders. (My wife is rather fond of "the Sims" and Civ-style games.)

    107. Re:Target Audience by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I'm a man, I am very aware of the size of the romance novel industry (larger than the rest of the book industry), and I look down on women who read romance novels for pretty much the reasons you called out (i.e. the books are mindless and a waste of time).

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    108. Re:Target Audience by serutan · · Score: 1

      Poor counterexamples? Seems to me these are perfectly ideal counterexamples. The thing that interests me is that men don't seem to feel inadequate when they see Duke Nukem or the Pittsburg Steelers, yet women do when they see Lara Croft or Charlie's Angels. Why is that?

    109. Re:Target Audience by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much for pointing this out. Recently I was having a conversation with my female cousin about the movie "Stepford Wives" (which I haven't seen) and she was telling me that the plot was that the husbands were turning their wives into robots who would act real lady like and do things like wear tiaras.

      My point was that I don't know a single man who would be interested in having their wife or girlfriend wearing a tiara, but I know lots of women who would wear tiaras everywhere if it was socially acceptable. (And my cousin agreed with me btw.)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    110. Re:Target Audience by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      There are many more Duke Nukems

      Duke Nukem I think is a bad example, because he was a HUGE womanizer, and the developers admitted that it was a game made by men, for men. Remember, the game was all about aliens coming to earth to impregnate our women, the only women I remember seeing were either in alien incubation pods, or in the strip clubs.

    111. Re:Target Audience by shylent · · Score: 1

      Thanks to a /. article i recently got into the game Project Entropia. while i fit in to the domographic of males playing female characters, in my short time of playing i have ran across several women who are *very* insistant that they are women in IRL. This is the first MMORG i have played aside from the games found on BBSes and i have noticed advantages and disadvantages of a female character. One of hte disadvantages is being hit on by guys and because of that i can see how women players who want to get down to playing and not mess with the hassles of being hit on might play male characters. my theory is that there might be an equivelent ratio of women who play as males as males who play as females. As far as the way women are portrayed in games. I wish that they were more realistic.. I for one am not attracted at all to the model type, i prefer the average looking girl or even "tomboys" and even a lil plump as opposed to the super skinny callista flockhart, or big breasted bay watch type. In PE though, the women look MUCh more sexy in full armor than in thongs and skimpy outfits. there ar several women in there that either worked very hard to get where they are or have payed alot of money and they have the weapons, armor and even houses to show for it.

    112. Re:Target Audience by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I don't see what is so hard to understand about this... Duke Nukem and the Pittburgh Steelers don't offend men because the embody male fantasy about what men should be.

      I know this will just be met by a bunch of antecdotal "no's" but I submit to you the female fantasy of the handyman yet cute guy on a show like TLC's "Trading Space". I contend that this character would make many men feel inadequate.

    113. Re:Target Audience by imroy · · Score: 1
      I've never heard another male video gamer complain `Duke's arms are too muscular!` or `Look at those pecs, they're unnatural!`.

      True. But one of the main reasons I usually play as a female character is because all the male ones usually look like and act like self-centred jerks. That's just not me. I'm also not female, but at least they are nice to look at. And it's fun to beat up those same egotistical male characters with a diminutive girl :)

    114. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Ok, if you have such big tits then WHY isn't there a picture of them on your website. I spent 20 minutes poking around it looking for some visuals to no avail! Have a heart, show us your tits!

    115. Re:Target Audience by inetuid · · Score: 1

      LMFAO

    116. Re:Target Audience by digitalpeer · · Score: 1

      If that's true, then isn't having slender-waisted, large breasted women characters also marketing towards a femal fantasy?

      There might be some truth to that.

      The weather channel is being sued because they supposedly fired a woman based on the fact that she is losing her sex appeal.

      The videotape the woman is using as evidence is an instructional video which claims that women are the most critical of how other women look and that women will be picked apart more than men. Appealing women in video games might very well appeal to female game players more than we think.

    117. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I have to ask -- am I the only one here who thinks that girls in bloomers = pretty damn sexy?

    118. Re:Target Audience by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      Should game designers put an option in their "options" menu for "sex of player" then?

      Yes! I mean, sometimes it's not practical, but when it is practical, you should be able to choose the gender of your charactor. And Square-enix needs to have more games with female main charactors. So many girls play their games, and yet they just ignore this. I, personally, am sick of playing (Final Fantasies) as some dumb boy who spends most of the game trying to get together with the girl. Can't I play as the girl? And no, X-2 did not count, because they forgot to give it a storyline.

      And would most women want a small-breasted woman on the computer screen?

      Uh, why not? I think most women gamers don't care about that, as long as the charactor on screen isn't too badly disproportionate.

      Personally I think small-breasted woman are fine (as long as they are my age, 25-30).

      So you think all women who are not 25-30 should have large breasts? Huh?

      Big boobed girl - "duh like totally want to go to the mall"

      Small-boobed girl - "whoa lets play 100 more rounds of KOF 2002 and then we will know who kicks ass!"


      Uh, yeah, those boobs are really filled with brain matter. Right.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    119. Re:Target Audience by fshalor · · Score: 1

      It's rather obvious on TS or ventrillo. Or at lan parties.

      Or if the're people you already know.

      Then again. I am reminded of that NCIS episode.... ehk!

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    120. Re:Target Audience by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Then again. I am reminded of that NCIS episode.... ehk!

      Which one?

      The one where the one lesbian chick kills the other, and frames it on a dead guy (as a copycat of a murder that the dead guy really did commit 10 years earlier)? Or is there one that I missed?

    121. Re:Target Audience by mink · · Score: 1

      "(i.e. the books are mindless and a waste of time)"
      So are video games, when it comes down to it.

      Maybe if you stopped looking down on people for the choice in escapeism they make you might be a better person.

      We all (humans) hqave our mindless wastes of time, be they bad movies, romance books, trashy sci-fi/fantasy/mystery novels, even most sports could be called mindless wastes of time.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    122. Re:Target Audience by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      Why no boobie pictures? Because I don't want to get slashdotted. Obviously.

    123. Re:Target Audience by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Hey! Did I draw any conclusions? I was just stating a fact

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    124. Re:Target Audience by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      step 4 is sell beauty products that will raise the self esteem, that the market has caused to drop by marketing an unrealistic body image.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    125. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's fucking ugly, that's why. I've seen pictures of her before and it's not a pretty sight.

    126. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      booobie pix! roffle

    127. Re:Target Audience by mikefe · · Score: 1

      So, I take it your GF has a "normal" size rump?

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    128. Re:Target Audience by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      Not hard to choose? I think if I had to choose between the mall and King of Fighters I'd go back to masturbating pretty quickly.

      King of Fighters?

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    129. Re:Target Audience by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      Yes, because women are so victimized at the Chanel counter.

      Seriously.

    130. Re:Target Audience by qurk · · Score: 1

      At least KoF has more creativity than Halo ;)

    131. Re:Target Audience by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      well duh. as if ultra skinny chicks complain about computer game girls being portrayed as ultra skinny chicks :)

  2. DOA series by UNCfan4life · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the DOA series. That volleyball game was purely eye candy for thirteen year olds. And Rumble Roses looks to be about the same, though I've never seen more than an ad for it.

    --
    Caution - poster has no actual knowledge. Read at your own risk.
  3. buxom virtual ladies by drgonzo59 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If having a slew of "buxom virtual ladies" is wrong then I don't want to be right.

    1. Re:buxom virtual ladies by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Here you go!
      (Oh, wait... you wanted 'em in a game...)
      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  4. boobies==bad?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    **purplexed**

  5. What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sometimes women will say to me "Look at those scantily clad women with their tits hanging out on the box! That's sexist!"

    To which I have to say "Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles".

    These games aren't any different than music videos or movies. Do you see any ugly people in music videos or movies aimed at 18-25 audience? Of course not. No one attacks the music industry for using half-naked chicks and musclemen with abs-o-steele to get teenagers to watch their videos...

    1. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and how many women do you know who actually think piles-of-muscles is attractive? That's aiming at the men too. :)

      (Yes, I'm calling you latent. Deal.)

    2. Re:What about the studly men!? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1, Redundant

      No one attacks the music industry for using half-naked chicks and musclemen with abs-o-steele to get teenagers to watch their videos...


      I beg to differ.

    3. Re:What about the studly men!? by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles

      So you're saying it's okay to objectify women if we also objectify men?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:What about the studly men!? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Sometimes women will say to me "Look at those scantily clad women with their tits hanging out on the box! That's sexist!" -- To which I have to say "Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles". -- These games aren't any different than music videos or movies. Do you see any ugly people in music videos or movies aimed at 18-25 audience? Of course not. No one attacks the music industry for using half-naked chicks and musclemen with abs-o-steele to get teenagers to watch their videos...

      Exactly right. I was looking in the Health & Beauty (the combination is actually rather ironic and people regularly ruin their health to maintain some ideal of beauty) and what do you see headlining the featured auctions? Peni pills, pumps, b00b enhancement, etc.

      Honestly, when I saw the recent pictures of Anna Nicole Smith, I thought she looked rather worse for wear (see what the beautician does to the girl in Shaolin Soccer, ecch!)

      <curmudgeon mode>why, back in my day i couldn't get enough of a girl with well defined pixels!</curmudgeon mode>

      I hardly watch TV anymore and find music videos very trying. There are some advantages to getting older. It's quite remarkable outside pop culture how good some ladies look who aren't over done in any way, especially artificially. Those who do, attract the stares a freak would. Best be happy with yourself and your friends as you/they are. Games, eh, I don't buy them one looks anyway. I've been ripped off enough on sharp cover art and shoddy game play.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:What about the studly men!? by Gallowsgod · · Score: 1

      You do, of course, have a point. The he-man dudes are probably one of the main reasons why the use of steroids have increased so much the last 10-15 years, just as the barbie look probably has caused an increase in eating disorders etc for girls and women.
      Of course, sexism might be part of the problem, but not the whole problem.

      --

      The belief in a biblical god is an ignorant one
    6. Re:What about the studly men!? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      Sometimes women will say to me "Look at those scantily clad women with their tits hanging out on the box! That's sexist!"

      To which I would say, tell me that while you're ogling shirtless male models at the Abercrombie store...

    7. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right. Women are more attracted to men with piles-of-money.

    8. Re:What about the studly men!? by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Games, TV, Movies, music, these are all put together as fantasies. As such the characters in them are also fantasy versions of real life. Simply having Lara Croft, the girls from DOA or any other feemale character with large boobs does not mean women are simply being objectified. That is something an individual does.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    9. Re:What about the studly men!? by pla · · Score: 0, Troll

      So you're saying it's okay to objectify women if we also objectify men?

      Objectify, or worship?

      I consider it telling that you mostly just hear females complaining about the sexism in having characters like Lara Croft.

      To what do you attribute that?

      A real sense of having men treat them as objects...

      Or a DESIRE to have men behave toward them the same way they do toward Lara?


      The "objectification" and "sexist" argument annoys me greatly. This doesn't involve inequality, it involves pure, simple jealousy. Nothing more than the basic "Why does my boyfriend like a group of pixels more than he likes me?" But if you get to that question, you've already made a HUGE (and erroneous) leap to conclude that he does like the pixels more than you.

    10. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the new Larry for Magna Cum Laude IS a short dude with a (small) pot belly. Not bald, though.

    11. Re:What about the studly men!? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      No one attacks the music industry for using half-naked chicks and musclemen with abs-o-steele to get teenagers to watch their videos...

      Are you kidding or are you just fucking stupid?

      Have you heard of this television station called "MTV", which has been the target of complaints by practically every feminist, religious and childrens group since it's inception over 20 years ago for showing too many hypersexed music videos, and there have got to be several hundred news programs which cover the contraversy.

      There have been people around to complain about sex and music since humans developed a sense of morality...

    12. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lets face it, nobody wants to look at a ugly person. Even I don't. I don't want to sound too harsh but I freakin hate ugly people. If I'm at work and I see an ugly person, I generally avoid assisting them.

    13. Re:What about the studly men!? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      with their tits hanging out on the box! That's sexist!"...To which I have to say "Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles".

      Mario! (Well, he has hair)

    14. Re:What about the studly men!? by kaiidth · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Well, both sexes are regularly 'objectified' (if anybody's a believer in "objectification is just a politically correct excuse to whine", see this site for a bit of not-too-crap research and discussion on the matter, such as it is), although it's a relatively recent phenomenon for men - there's a vaguely interesting article on the subject here.

      One suggestion in this article is that the increasingly frequent appearance of these idealised images of men are causing similar effects to those often seen in women, blamed on objectification by feminists, and laughed away by the rest of the world :-) And I quote:

      The bodies in advertisements come to represent an ideal that individuals seek to achieve, and hence provide the foundation for a masochistic or punitive relationship with one's own body. It becomes possible to think about one s body as if it were this thing which followed one about and attached itself unevenly to the ideal outline which lingers beneath (Coward, 1992, p. 416). The dislike for the body becomes pathological and has very real consequences such as low self-esteem, distorted self-image, eating disorders, and even changing the body through painful plastic surgery (Coward, 1992; Kilbourne, 1999;Wolf, 1991).

      Increasingly, these consequences are manifesting in men, who are responding to a consumer culture that is less and less forgiving of those who are not sufficiently young, thin, and attractive. In response to these images of the perfect male, men are getting manicures and facials, dyeing their hair, concealing blemishes, and spending millions on plastic surgery.

      In 1992, men spent $88 million on liposuction, facelifts, nose-reshaping, and eyelid surgery. This number increased to almost $130 million in 1997. In 1996, men spent $12 million on penile implants, and silicone calf and pectoral implants are rapidly increasing in popularity (Fraser, 1999). In addition, men now account for almost 10% of individuals suffering with eating disorders (Fraser, 1999). In short, men are increasingly dissatisfied with their bodies, go to great lengths to achieve a more youthful and hard-bodied appearance, and are suffering the psychological consequences that are a side effect of consumer culture.


      So there we are. Finally, equality of the sexes; we all get to have bad self-image thrust upon us! The bonus side is I suppose that one day it might well equal out; when we're all totally freaked out, bulimic gym zombies, maybe there'll be an advertising revolution of some kind.

      And the cynical part of me also wants to add: what goes around, comes around...
    15. Re:What about the studly men!? by mezza550 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but you're ignoring the fact that the video games, with some exceptions, are mainly played by males.

    16. Re:What about the studly men!? by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 0

      Romance novels (those on display at the super market check out) I dare say are marketed towards women. On the cover of those is almost always a large muscular man (90% of the time Fabio) with his shirt open, or off for all to see his massize pecks. I don't hear any guys complaining that is sexist. Why should video games (and cars and power tools) be sexist for advertising appealing to young men who are most likely to buy them?

    17. Re:What about the studly men!? by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      yeah :-)

      and I can guarantee that Mario probably has about as much sex appeal as the he-man looking dudes. According to womens' magazines (bleurgh) womens' ideas of the sexiest guys out there are, for example, Jude Law, Orlando Bloom, Robbie Williams...

      In other words, out of the Lord of the Rings, women would choose the sensitive'n'reserved elf. Enigmatic, dreamy-eyed, sad-looking and caring is where it's at (puke at will).

      Any of them on the computer game boxes? (hey, I don't play -- so I honestly don't know)

    18. Re:What about the studly men!? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Well Gordon Freeman isn't a taditional he man, not sure if he is sexy or not though.

    19. Re:What about the studly men!? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      To which I have to say "Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles".

      How about Lucy and Biker from Quake III?

    20. Re:What about the studly men!? by bynary · · Score: 1

      I think he is saying just the opposite.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    21. Re:What about the studly men!? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Do you see any ugly people in music videos or movies aimed at 18-25 audience?

      Ever been to a BareNakedLadies show? Maybe they aren't ugly, but they are (were) fat.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    22. Re:What about the studly men!? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct. Anybody ever bought a pair of jockies? You have to wade past poster after giant poster of six-three Calvin Klein models with their packages hanging out. And that's marketing for *men*!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    23. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many women do you know who actually think piles-of-muscles is attractive?

      Oh, have you been telling yourself chicks dig frail noodle armed programmers?

      Well, what ever makes you feel better...

    24. Re:What about the studly men!? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it's okay to objectify women if we also objectify men?

      I'm asserting that if the objectification is roughly equal, then it isn't a "woman's issue" in that it applies to everyone equally.

    25. Re:What about the studly men!? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      out of the Lord of the Rings, women would choose the sensitive'n'reserved elf. Enigmatic, dreamy-eyed, sad-looking and caring is where it's at (puke at will).

      Ane here I thought it was because he had a hot body. At least that's what the women I talked to said.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    26. Re:What about the studly men!? by jthayden · · Score: 1

      Do you see any ugly people in music videos or movies aimed at 18-25 audience?

      Drew Carey was in Wierd Al's 'All About the Pentiums' viedeo. It was only the best video ever.

    27. Re:What about the studly men!? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Not just that. Such book covers also 90% of the time will feature a female lead character that would feel right at home at E3 or GDC. Someone already brought up Cosmo and Vogue.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:What about the studly men!? by be-fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes. Because, fundementally, objectification is distillation and simplification, something that humans do every day, are programmed to do by instinct, and must do to retain their sanity.

      Do you have a gardener? We have a pretty big lawn, so we had to get a gardener. Our's is pretty good, I'll give you a number if you're interested.

      Notice I didn't say "person who tends your lawn". I said "gardener". Just as I would say, "do you have a lawn mower?". I treated the person as an object, and object whose sole purpose was to care for my lawn. Of course, if I hadn't read into that statement, you'd never have given it a second thought, because it's a completely normal process. There is no malice in it, it's just a matter of reducing the amount of information we have to consider.

      Except for the ones we know most closely, we consider everyone to be objects, various lumps of matter whose lives are inconsequential to us beyond the singular role they play in our own. The fact that we do so in entertainment and advertising is not only not shocking, it is to be expected, and perfectly natural.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    29. Re:What about the studly men!? by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      That too, but it isn't the deciding factor from what I can see. Putting aside the fact that getting a 100% accurate report of what she's really thinking on the subject is kinda unlikely.

      Here's a hundred sexiest men list if you want to go through and count the number of wistful/thoughtful expressions :-P

      Or take a look at Orlando Bloom posters like this, or this, this, or this ... or this (note the posture reminiscent of Rodin's The Thinker)...

      For some reason, this stuff sells. Despite lack of uncovered hot body :-)

    30. Re:What about the studly men!? by identity0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Jesus, this topic is filled with so many misconceptions of what women find attractive that I feel the need to interject. (disclaimer: I am a guy, but I tend to pay attention to what women want more than to the latest kernel release, unlike most slashdoters)

      You know what videogame character I've heard women I know be attracted to the most? It's goddamn Link, from the Zelda series. Not some steroid-abusing freak from Serious Sam or Duke Nukem, but the cute little dude with elf ears. The Final Fantasy guys are popular with girls, too.

      The muscle-bound tough guy is more of an asperation for guys than an attraction for girls, though girls like that to a certain extent. Girls tend to like the more realistic, cuter guys who have an personality than one-liners about kicking ass.

      Simple question: have you ever seen Arnie or Stallone on the poster for some chick flick? No, it's always some relatively wimpy-looking guy like Cusack or Cruise. So stop pretending that Nukem & pals are trying to attract women - they're clearly not.

      As a side note, Nintendo seems to be doing a much better job of attracting women than other companies. The girls that I knew in high school who played lots of video games always seemed to be talking about Nintendo games like Pokemon, Mario, Donkey Kong, Kirby, etc.

    31. Re:What about the studly men!? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      I'm asserting that if the objectification is roughly equal, then it isn't a "woman's issue" in that it applies to everyone equally.

      I think it is the manner and intent of the objectification that women are finding offensive. The "big brawny men" in the games aren't as overtly and pointlessly sexualised as the women. I suspect if the men were portrayed wearing extremely suggestive leather outfits, prominent and oversized (and carefully animated) codpieces, and all the animations tended to involve splyed legs to show off the carefully animated penis wobbles and endless suggestive hip movements... well, I suspect guys wouldn't be quite so happy with such characters.

      Jedidiah.

    32. Re:What about the studly men!? by kesuki · · Score: 2, Funny

      To which I have to say "Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles".

      Doh!

    33. Re:What about the studly men!? by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      "To which I have to say "Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles"."

      And that is how you know you have gay men working in the gaming industry. No woman I know (including myself) finds that attractive.
    34. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a bit of a point. If you follow anime, you know that the gals dig the bishounen... fit but very feminine looking guys. Most will admit to it. They like guys who are adorable, not hunks of meat. The macho guys such as Duke or Sam play more to the male audience than anything. If we're going around blowing up everything in sight, odds are it's cool to be some buffed out superhero doing it. Or for that matter, MIT grad super scientist Gordan Freeman.

      But the point still stands that guys don't complain about guys in video games.
      Gals however, constantly complain about gals in video games. (And the industry, designers, etc.)

    35. Re:What about the studly men!? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it's okay to objectify women if we also objectify men?

      Sure. But then I'm not some ultra-PC hack looking for a return of Puritanism under the guise of 'sensitivity'.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    36. Re:What about the studly men!? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      for showing too many hypersexed music videos

      "hypersexed" only in the opinion of a bunch of tight-assed freaks with a penchant for Puritanism that they just HAVE to try to enforce on the rest of us.

      There have been people around to complain about sex and music since humans developed a sense of morality...

      It isn't morality that drives them, but the desire for the power to tell everyone else how to live their lives. These people are just plain evil, in a very petty way.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    37. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine.

      I'm confident enough about my sexuality that I can admit a man has great abs without worrying if I'm gay.

    38. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metal Gear 2 Solid Snake features a naked effeminate guy running around. It sold quite well as I recall.

    39. Re:What about the studly men!? by Rhone · · Score: 1

      As a counterexample, I have a female friend at work who openly professes to liking muscular guys. She watched Walking Tall just to see "The Rock".

      But yes, I will admit that she is outnumbered by the women I know who fawn over guys like Johnny Depp.

    40. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      changing the body through painful plastic surgery (Coward, 1992; Kilbourne, 1999;Wolf, 1991).

      Finally I am quoted properly!
      A. Coward

    41. Re:What about the studly men!? by Stween · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, have clearly not seen The Darkness.

    42. Re:What about the studly men!? by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Define "objectify". Does it mean anything more than "represent"? Are there any examples of non-objectifying representations of men or women? (I'm not flaming, I'd honestly like answers.)

    43. Re:What about the studly men!? by Regolith · · Score: 1

      No, actually it's not. They are marketing to all of the women who are tired of their boyfriend/husband being perfectly content wearing five year old underoos with a bunch of holes in the crotch (or so I'm told ;))

      --

      Bow before my sig, for it is good.
    44. Re:What about the studly men!? by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      The point isn't that the guy characters are being objectified for women like the girl characters are for guys, it's that all these characters are superficial stereotypes. It's not sexist, it's just shallow. Also, to be fair, these video game characters -are- objects.

      Personally, I think the buxom women are good to have. It lets me know how bad the plot is going to be just by looking at the box.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    45. Re:What about the studly men!? by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles".

      What about Mario? I wasn't aware he was the pinnacle of machismo and sex appeal.

      Also, ugly people show up in TV and movies all the time. You just don't notice, because they're on TV.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    46. Re:What about the studly men!? by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      I'll vouch for that. Link, Cloud and Sephiroth are the most universally-lusted after male characters. Honestly, I can't think of another genuinely sexy video game man. Sly Cooper comes to mind, but he's a freakin raccoon.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    47. Re:What about the studly men!? by Ossadagowah · · Score: 1

      I can think of one videogame character with
      a wispy, sensitive guy:

      Metal Gear Solid 2, and Raiden. Perhaps Orlando could play him in the movie.

      --
      anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
    48. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole bishounen thing is really an extreme case though. In pretty much any other culture you'll find that the projected masculine ideal at the very least has broader shoulders than the projected femenine ideal.

    49. Re:What about the studly men!? by Catnapster · · Score: 2, Informative

      All the gamer-girls I know love Sephiroth from Final Fantasy 7.

      This guy doesn't even exist and he gets more chicks than I do. Fuck Sephiroth.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    50. Re:What about the studly men!? by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      Finally, someone who gets it...

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    51. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do you have a gardener? We have a pretty big lawn, so we had to get a gardener. Our's is pretty good, I'll give you a number if you're interested.

      But is he a muscle bound stud or not?

    52. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem, not to mention that the main character is called Solid Snake...

    53. Re:What about the studly men!? by cobyrne · · Score: 1

      So there we are. Finally, equality of the sexes; we all get to have bad self-image thrust upon us!

      Yes, but just because it is thrust upon us, it doesn't mean that we have to take it on board! Of course, too many people DO take it on board, and that is tragic. These images that are being thrust upon us are someone else's fantasy, and that is all they are. So what are we to do about the tradegy - ban fantasy?

      The key question is - why do people take this on board, as clearly not everyone does. Is it, perhaps, because it is easier for me to work towards being Arnie than it is for me to work towards being me? If so, then I need to learn that it is better (and, actually, easier) for me to work towards being me than anyone else on the planet, and that there is great value in that.

    54. Re:What about the studly men!? by mzipay · · Score: 1

      read the post, read the linked article... still a believer in "objectification is just a politically correct excuse to whine."

      >> "Finally, equality of the sexes; we all get to have bad self-image
      >> thrust upon us!"

      always cracks me up to hear someone say something like this. stop for a moment and think about what you wrote. if your SELF-image can be thrust UPON you (implies: by ANOTHER), then "objectification" is not the problem - the problem is that you permit external forces to define you when you should be defining yourself.

    55. Re:What about the studly men!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, it's kinda hard to do music videos without showing the freaking band. The post was talking about EXTRAS, people hired just to be in the video.

    56. Re:What about the studly men!? by Altus · · Score: 1


      so... women dont want men with huge muscles... I dont want chicks with double D breasts...

      its still objectifying and requiring men to live up to a standard when all of the male sex symbols are metro-sexual.

      see any geeks in that list? see any tough biker types? see any outdoors-men types?

      I first noticed this trent with beverly hill 90210... inorder to be attractive by that shows standards (and the standards of the shows that followed in its wake) you needed to have those "Im oh so sensitive and affected" eyebrows...

      EYEBROWS for christsake...

      just because it doesnt take the form you expect it do doesnt mean that it isnt there....

      on the other hand its not like I ran out to get eyebrow implants.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    57. Re:What about the studly men!? by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Total, total agreement :-)

    58. Re:What about the studly men!? by mikefe · · Score: 1

      It's called "Peer Pressure" and "Groupthink", which are known phenomenon.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  6. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the current depiction of women seems to sell games well enough and appeal to the main market, why the hell would the game makers want to change it?

    I mean, while big breasted scantily-clad women might not inspire me to buy a game, they certainly add to the appeal.

  7. Department... by dylan_- · · Score: 4, Funny
    from the pink-boxes-not-needed dept.
    Hmm...so, either:

    1: "Box" isn't used as a slang term in the USA

    or

    2: Slashdot is even geekier than I thought...or perhaps less geeky...I'm not sure now...
    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    1. Re:Department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is used somewhat, but it's not an especially common one.

    2. Re:Department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solly, cholly. Slashdot editors have their heads so far up their asses they know nothing outside of games, windows, and that 386 running linux in the corner.

    3. Re:Department... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      dude, we're all looking at apple's new white box.

      get with the program!

    4. Re:Department... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a little confused about that myself. I live in the US, and that means what I think you think it means to me also... We must both have missed the class on this one.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:Department... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They mean the boxes that "games for girls" come in don't have to be pink. And/or that "games for girls" is an inherently stupid concept.

    6. Re:Department... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      1: "Box" isn't used as a slang term in the USA

      No no "box" is still a slang term in the U.S. Originally people used to say "Come on man, don't be a square." But that was back in the day of 2d sprites. In this modern three dimensional non-curved surfaces world of Quake 2 we've moved up to saying "Don't be a box, man."

      Oh wait, that box.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    7. Re:Department... by freshman_a · · Score: 2, Funny


      from the pink-boxes-not-needed dept.


      of course "boxes" means "computers" and not that other kind of box. slashdot is pro-eunuchs after all.

      (the previous post is an attempt at humor)

    8. Re:Department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how come Barbie never gets pregnant?

      Because Ken cums in a different box

      hahahaha

    9. Re:Department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took quite a while for me to understand that joke, guess because I had to read this Barbie post to get the other meaning...

    10. Re:Department... by TexasDex · · Score: 1
      What on earth is Box slang for?!?!

      Urban Dictionary: Box

      Oooooh....

      heheheheheheheheh

      --
      The Cheese Stands Alone.
    11. Re:Department... by Knightfall · · Score: 1

      Um, dudes ... come on ... in the US tampons come in PINK BOXES. Ever been the victum of, "Honey could you grab me some *** while you are out ... I use the ones in the PINK BOX." Then you get there and the whole GD row is nothing but F'ing ping boxes ... how the hell am I supposed to figure this out. I don't have this plumbing ... pink box my @$$.

      Not that I'm speaking from experience or anything ... just what I've heard.

      So anyway, no pink boex are needed because there are no women gamers was the horribly incorrect point I think they were going for.

      --


      Knightfall
    12. Re:Department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      pink box my @$$.

      Uh... dude... that's not how you use 'em.

    13. Re:Department... by HyperCash · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of an away message a friend of mine used for a while.

      "I might not have my cherry but I still have the box it came in."

      Never failed to make me crack a smile.

      --HC

      --
      So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
    14. Re:Department... by neurocutie · · Score: 1

      You haven't lived until you've seen Robyn Byrd prancing around in her tiny bikini to the sounds of "Baby, Let me Bang your Box"...

    15. Re:Department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG IAL'd at this.

    16. Re:Department... by mink · · Score: 1

      To correct you (as a married man who has to sometimes get a few things from the store) they come in all different color boxes and more often plastic bags. Shades of green and blue IMO are far more common then pink, but this probably has more to do with the fact that ther are about 40 differnt types of pads and at least 9 types of tampons a woman can chose from and if they were all the same color it would make it even harder to tell tehm apart.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    17. Re:Department... by Knightfall · · Score: 1

      Also a married man who gets things from the store. The one I am sent to has about a 95% pink / other color ratio. That was what I was basing my comment on :-)

      --


      Knightfall
  8. From the "pink-boxes-not-needed dept"? by damnnicks · · Score: 1

    But the article is about gamer girls and... Oh, you mean computer boxes!

    Heh.

  9. Re:Zoe Flower? by stupidfoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Zoe Flower sounds more like a porn name, to me at least.

  10. objectification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is focusing on a woman's body objectification? And not focusing on her mind or her personality? Clearly I don't look at women's bodies as "objects" but as "women's bodies". Oh well. I just treat that as one of those words like "empowerment" that doesn't really mean anything except to indicate how much self-censorship you have to impose around the person who said it.

    For the record I don't like Lara Croft or booth babes or fake tits, but I'm not ashamed to find a woman attractive based on her looks alone.

  11. How quaint by krog · · Score: 2, Funny

    A girl who calls herself "Zoe Flower" is going to lecture us on feminism in video gaming.

    I'll go back to playing nethack now.

    1. Re:How quaint by Staos · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's her real name. Her parents were hippies.

      I'm being completely serious here. She used to write a collumn for OPM, and she wrote about her name once.

      --
      In Soviet russia, only old Koreans profit from pictures of Natalie Portman stored on Beowulf Clusters.
    2. Re:How quaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      she was one time co host of "electric playground"

      she owned a gaming cafe.

      she does another show called hardcore candy, about women in extreme sports.

      she is tall, gorgeous, a sweetheart, and married.

      i worked for the company that produced electric playground. her cafe was 6 doors over from our studio. she was in our offices all the time.

    3. Re:How quaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what's even more ironic is that, although she is complaining about the objectification and sexualisation of women in video games, she sees herself as this: http://www.zoeflower.com/images/demo/gamergirlwhit e.jpg

      Now tell me that image doesn't at least vaguely attempt to make her a sexual object.

    4. Re:How quaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She claims different on her web-site:

      "Is Zoe Flower your real name?
      You betcha. I don't think its a smart idea to scan a copy of birth certificate to prove it so you'll have to trust me. The Flower name has been passed down through the generations in England, and I have plenty of relatives with the green thumb...my mom in particular. Seems to have skipped over me and most green things in my home die rather quickly. But I do have fast thumbs for games. The name Zoe is the ancient greek word for "Life" and my parents thought the name was interesting. No they weren't hippies although they did grow up in psychadelic England during the 60's."
      http://www.zoeflower.com/faq.html

  12. Sheesh by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Give the feminazi shit a rest for awhile.

    If Lara Croft was a fat bull-dyke noone would buy or play the game.

    BTW, before you start crying "sexism", you might want to note that male characters are invariably the 6'4 rugged Dirty-Harry type.

    I've never seen an FPS where you play a myopic, balding, fat kernel hacker.

    Half Life was as non-stereotype a lead character as I've seen, and that's only because Gordon wears glasses.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Sheesh by cgranade · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. This article challenges the perception that women are the only ones stereotyped against, as well as that the portrayal of women in games must be inherently anti-feminist. Playboy: Mansion's lead designer is a woman. Moreover, she is pregnant with twins.

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

    2. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen an FPS where you play a myopic, balding, fat kernel hacker.

      Alan Cox is back in Revenge of the Tux Part Deux!

      Yes, now you can transverse the halls of Microsoft with your favorite weapons... toss a handgrenade into the board room. Set fire to Paul Allen's Porsche... Rig the Gate's home for demolition! And enjoy the change of scenary as you, as Alan Cox, make your way to the great state of Utah for sniping action at the SCO office! Lie in wait for Darl McBride as he skulks from the building... Pick off lawyers at will! Special bonus editions of the game unlock the Linus character, which is sure to be a hoot, as his special abilities are sushi breath of death, and business cards of doom!
      Following the themes of various first person shooters, such as Duke Nuke'em 3D, Linus and Alan will both shout funny phrases such as, "Crack Smoker" and "Take that one to the loo, Darl!" Game goes on sale Christmas 2005, pre-order from Id Software today!

    3. Re:Sheesh by LeiGong · · Score: 1
      I've never seen an FPS where you play a myopic, balding, fat kernel hacker.

      close... what about these two?

    4. Re:Sheesh by CaptainCheese · · Score: 1

      Being pregnant, female or a pornographer does not necessarily make one a feminist.

      --
      -- .sigs are a waste of data...turn them off...
    5. Re:Sheesh by sqlgeek · · Score: 1

      Maybe folk will cry sexism when they read redneck comments like "fat bull-dyke."

      And the fact that men in video games are attractive is _not_ the same thing as the objectification of women in video games. The women are not simply attractive, they are highly sexualized. If the male characters were that sexualized the whole thing would look like a cliche gay bar. The crucial point, however, is that the objectification of women by men is a very concrete manifestation of patriarchy -- it is a manifestation of the power position that men hold over women. Men are almost never threatened when women objectify then, the reverse is commonly true.

      Encouraging, and in fact reveling in the privilege men possess is ugly. Using it to market to men is beyond amoral as far as I'm concerned.

      Scott

      P.S. The term is "no one," there is no such word as noone.

      S.

    6. Re:Sheesh by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Playboy: Mansion's lead designer is a woman.

      Nonsequitor.

      Moreover, she is pregnant with twins.

      Unbelievably absurd nonsequitor.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    7. Re:Sheesh by turgid · · Score: 1
      Playboy: Mansion's lead designer is a woman. Moreover, she is pregnant with twins.

      That's what you get for indulging in the Sins of the Flesh! She should have listened to the preacher and stayed at home baking cookies.

      Let that be a lesson to you all!

    8. Re:Sheesh by brkello · · Score: 2, Informative

      hahaha, ok, so much wrong with this. So what if she is a woman...so what if she has twins. Just because she finds it acceptable to portray women that way, doesn't mean that women in general can't object to the way they are depicted. The fact that she is a woman and is pregnant with twins is irrelevant to everything. It's good you RTFA, but C(omprehending)TFA is important too. It's like that skit on the Chapelle Show. He plays a blind black man who is a member of the KKK and a white supremicist. Just because he is black, doesn't mean white supremacy is ok.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    9. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a word: blow.

      To speak of women being objectified in games implies a certain objectification of males as well. As if a buxom character is the only thing males care about. It says a lot more about your own mindset than the audience as a whole.

      Further, if female are sexualized in a game, what does that really imply? That sexuality is the only means a girl can use to get ahead, or that perhaps a large segment of the population simply isn't getting any (cue music about sexual exploitation here)? I pray for a day when sexual overtones in games is seen as largely redundant because neither gender is holding sex as a bargaining tool in a power play (but at the moment, it seems to apply mostly to girls).

      The patriarchy bit is fairly well worn. It could just as easily be argued that women never needed to obtain formalized power because they could always exploit their sexuality to gain what they want. I don't mean to imply that women have had an easy go of it, but I imagine the truth is somewhere in-between.

      And finally, how come women are only objectified as sex symbols? Riddle me that batman, and I'll show you where the real exploitation is.

    10. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kernel "hacker"

      dewly noted, kernel "hacker" - new name for script kiddie, are we supposed to be scared?

    11. Re:Sheesh by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Moreover, she is pregnant with twins.
      Unbelievably absurd nonsequitor.
      Well, it at least suggests she probably does not object to all sexual activity. (And it's "non sequitur", from Latin, BTW.)

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    12. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "bull-dyke" ? -- didn't realize people still talk like this. Caught me a bit off-guard really, didn't expect to hear that from this crowd.

    13. Re:Sheesh by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That presupposes that men do hold a power position over women. While I agree that is true of society generally, I disagree that this is true of the video-game or entertainment industries specifically. Without proving that men in these market segments have any privlege over women, your argument rings hollow.

      I think it's pointless for the feminist side of the gender debate to tackle the high-profile, but ultimately meaningless, topic of gender representation in entertainment. Entertainment thrives on creating carictures of all people, from the redneck white-male to the dumb busty blonde. Pointing out such characterizations is just restating the obvious. It's far more important to concentrate on the real gender problems in our society --- like Britney Spears extolling the virtues of "young motherhood", or the severe lack of women studying mathematics and science, or the ridiculously patriarchical system that is the US government. Those are real problems, there is no point getting distracted by imagined ones.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    14. Re:Sheesh by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Yet being female automatically makes one a dumb, busty, blonde whore? The same argument works to the benefit of the other side --- one person who displays certain qualities attributed to females does not represent females in general. This is as true if the person is a pregnant game designer, or if the person is a dumb blonde hooker.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    15. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be honest! How many of you are doing theoretical physics at mit because of half life? :D

    16. Re:Sheesh by cgranade · · Score: 1

      I apologize for not making my point more clearly. What I was hoping to illustrate was not that such portrayals are "OK," but that the nature of the opposition and support of such imagery is very much so not what the stereotypes lead one to believe. What I took offense at in the original post was the use of the deragatory term "feminazi," coined by the sexist chauvanist Rush. Such a term does not contribute to the discussion, and invokes a very specific set of stereotypes which do not accurately characterize this controversy.

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

    17. Re:Sheesh by Phenylene · · Score: 0
      Half Life was as non-stereotype a lead character as I've seen, and that's only because Gordon wears glasses.

      Consider that Half-Life was made by Valve up in Bellevue, near Seattle, where THE stereotype is thick black glasses and a goatee: the "Teach yourself HTML in 21 days!" dotcommer clones. The only thing that could have been more stereotype than that would have been equipping Gordon with a crowbar AND a latte.

    18. Re:Sheesh by Chris+Burke · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Give the anti-feminazi-kneejerk shit a rest for a while and RTFA.

      Also, the problem with Lara Croft wasn't much of a problem until Tomb Raider 2 which touted the increased polygon count of her chest as a selling point.

      By the way, play something other than an FPS. Female are characters are stereotyped much more in all genres.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    19. Re:Sheesh by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      "Playboy: Mansion's lead designer is a woman."

      Nonsequitor.


      Sure it is....to someone with a rational viewpoint of the world.

      To "feminists" (used in the correct Gloria Steinhem sense of the word) it is very much relevant.

      A good Steinhem quote the illustrate this would be:
      "A woman reading Playboy feels a little like a Jew reading a Nazi manual."


      Of course, this viewpoint shows an unbelieveably messed-up view of the world but many people have it. Here is one of the more interesting views on the subject:

      I have read this thread people. I'll tell you, the CENSORS are active.

      I am a young gay man and a depiction of a female body does not in any way affect me on a sexual level. Most of the time a depiction of male nudity doesn't even have that effect. Hot-Babe to me isn't even interesting software, but....

      After reading the "Womens Rights" posts, I am certainly going to install Hot-Babe out of principle.

      So it is forbidden to depict nudity, because it objectifies people?

      Well it would only objectify people if many generations were raised with the idea that their bodies are not something natural and should not be depicted, lest they "lose" their pent-up, prude, bourgeoise, narrowminded mentality.

      So it is "not done" to depict female nudity because it does not respect Women? Well, sorry, respect is something earned and personal, not something out of entitlement just because one was born with a penis or a vagina.

      The notion "I am female, I have a vagina, I am entitled to respect, so others shouldn't dare to depict female nudity, because I find it offensive to my vaginally bestowed respect entitlement" is absolutely ludicrous.


      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    20. Re:Sheesh by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      doesn't mean that women in general can't object to the way they are depicted.

      Of course they can - free speech and all. But it isn't the women who're making the objection who're being depicted as 'objects'. If they think so they're in serious need of therapy to cure their self-delusions.

      I suspect much of the ire here is due in part to the fact that the women pissed off over the whole thing don't, for the most part, have the attributes we so admire. Sounds like jealousy turned into some nonsensical PC crusade.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    21. Re:Sheesh by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      No, that is still a nonsequitor. I am a feminist. Dunno wtf you mean by "the Gloria Steinem sense of the word", but assume for a moment that your quote were a fact:
      "A woman reading Playboy feels a little like a Jew reading a Nazi manual."
      If you objected to some videogame saying that it was somehow anti-semitic, and I refuted you and said that the lead designer was a Jew, that would also be a nonsequitor. Women can be anti-feminist. Jews can be anti-semitic. The gender of the lead designer of the playboy videogame is completely irrelevant, whether you are a feminist or not. If you are suggesting otherwise, you're dumb.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    22. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you are suggesting otherwise, you're dumb."
      Good job destroying your credibility.

    23. Re:Sheesh by CaptainCheese · · Score: 1

      it's irrelevant, as was explained in more depth by brkello and Elwood P. Dowd in posts a few hours later than mine.

      Why are you pointing out all women are not busty blonde whores? Do you have to remind yourself on a regular basis so as to avoid falling into mysogyny? Because otherwise it's irrelevant too.

      --
      -- .sigs are a waste of data...turn them off...
    24. Re:Sheesh by rmoonsong · · Score: 1

      I've never seen an FPS where you play a myopic, balding, fat kernel hacker.

      Remember redneck rampage? Although it didn't sell very well. hmm.....

    25. Re:Sheesh by rmoonsong · · Score: 1

      If the male characters were that sexualized the whole thing would look like a cliche gay bar

      Have you seen the main character for FFXII?

    26. Re:Sheesh by be-fan · · Score: 1

      It's certainly not irrelevent. Your argument is flawed. If you accept that just because a women designed a game, that doesn't mean that the game speaks for women in general, you have to accept that just because there is a character of a certain type in a game, that does not mean that the game makes an observation about women in general. It's simple logic!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    27. Re:Sheesh by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      No, that is still a nonsequitor. I am a feminist. Dunno wtf you mean by "the Gloria Steinem sense of the word"

      I mean that by saying the word feminist, you're actually referring to the set of ideals held by the feminist movement rather than some aribtrary subset of less extreme viewpoints. If you don't know much about her viewpoints, you might care to research them more before claiming to agree with them.

      If you objected to some videogame saying that it was somehow anti-semitic, and I refuted you and said that the lead designer was a Jew, that would also be a nonsequitor. Women can be anti-feminist. Jews can be anti-semitic.

      Sure it's POSSIBLE, but that does not automatically make it irrelevant. The interesting thing about saying that this person is a woman, is that it makes even more clear the point that you haven't made a very strong argument. Here someone is, a woman, saying these games are bad. Here is another woman, who doesn't seem to think so. Where's the objective evidence?

      Think about what you're saying!
      Based on that twisted logic I can say that just about ANYTHING is anti-somegroup, and you'll automatically dismiss an entire side of the argument from those within that group.

      is completely irrelevant, whether you are a feminist or not. If you are suggesting otherwise, you're dumb.

      I would say that suggesting that a person's viewpoint and the vital statistics which influence that are definately NOT irrelevant and that ad hominem attacks are dumb.

      It comes down to this:
      A black man has a good idea what's keeping the black man down. He has EXPERIENCE being a black man.
      Saying that his viewpoint or his race is IRRELEVANT, because he might be anti-black is really foolish and silly.
      To really point out the silliness of this viewpoint:
      How do you know that the FIRST person isn't anti-somegroup, rather than the second?
      Suddenly it's now irrelevant that the woman this article is about is in fact a woman, and this is because it's possible that she may be anti-woman.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    28. Re:Sheesh by CaptainCheese · · Score: 1

      It's certainly not irrelevent. Your argument is flawed.

      What are you gibbering on about? I have put forth no agenda. I repeat my statement here in it's entirety; Try reading it again. "Being pregnant, female or a pornographer does not necessarily make one a feminist"

      A physically disabled nun who performs brain surgery would still not necessarily be a feminist. The only defining thing that makes one a feminist is actively encouraging social (and by extension political and economic) equality of women. It is essentially the act of recognising that men and women are just people: equals together...

      you have to accept that just because there is a character of a certain type in a game, that does not mean that the game makes an observation about women in general.

      Yes, that's quite true. As painful as it was to admit it to myself, I have come to accept that women are not all gun-toting archeologists or somesuch. Oh, wait, I never believed that - that's just some sort of retarded presumption on your part, pulled from the aether... In fact, I am denying a sterotype.

      It's simple logic!

      More like crazy moon-logic. Did you read my post, or the letters that God writes to you on the inside of your eyelids? You certainly are addressing something I have neither said nor implied.

      --
      -- .sigs are a waste of data...turn them off...
  13. Getting the what? by iamchaos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, Girl... Something we know nothing about. :)

    1. Re:Getting the what? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Yea really. I saw the title of the /. submission and I got all excited thinking it would be about advice on how to get girls to date me, so just this once I decided to click the link and RTFA...

      What a disappointment.

    2. Re:Getting the what? by aurb · · Score: 1

      Oh, Girl... Something we know nothing about. :)

      Well, here's your primary source of information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl. For a deeper view on subject consider using search engines with keywords pr0n, sex, and so on.

    3. Re:Getting the what? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      so just this once I decided to click the link and RTFA...

      Hand back your /. ID now.

  14. Just questioning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing to question, its an obvious no.

  15. Please... by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because there's pornos doesn't mean someone else can't release chick flicks. Similarly, just because Leisure Suit Larry games exist doesn't mean female preferred games like the Sims series haven't been released and done very well.

    Hopefully some publishers/designers will realise that they're excluding potential customers with such tactics like those who now release for Macs as well. But realistically, there will always be a probably large section of the industry [just like the movie industry] which will focus on their core target audience: horny, horny young men.

    1. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good point. I'll tell you what I've learned from my experience, and it may apply to gaming as a whole or it may not, but this is what I've learned.

      Since gaming was originally dominated by young males, games appealed to young males. Further, every gaming community developed a male-centric mentality. Therefore, the only girls who got into gaming where ones who could tolerate/embrace the male mentality. Not just because the games were designed for males, but also because the communities promoted a more male-centric culture.

      Not to say that these girls are manly or anything, but the girls are the types that got along with males. These are the girls that could get along at the movies with just themselves and 7 other guys.

      Thus, girls who don't fit into that profile are less likely to play games, less likely to buy games, and have less games designed for them. Girls who do fit into that profile do not have difficulty buying a game targetted towards men.

    2. Re:Please... by coldfront · · Score: 1
      This is an excellent point, and one missed by a ridiculously large proportion of the commenters on this article. No one is debating that sex sells. No one is debating that the video game industry is driven by the young male demographic, and that sexualized women market well to it. The article does not argue that having sexy women in video games is wrong.

      The main point of Flower's article is to wonder whether creating more reasonable, realistic female characters is a good way for the video game industry to reach out to women. Despite the fact that women comprise 50% of the population, the video game industry has not been successful in selling its products to women. You can throw your hands up and conclude video games just categorically don't appeal to most women. Or, you can think about how you can make a video game that does.

      So why is anyone surprised that one way to do this might be to create more realistic female characters that women can relate to? Yes, men in video games tend to be exaggerated in body type too: tall dark and handsome, muscles rippling, and so forth. However, there's no market-driven reason for that to change, as it hasn't stopped men from buying games in droves. Since women don't seem to be nearly as interested in video games, people in the industry should (and do) wonder about what they can change to bring in more female customers - not on the basis of a sexism argument, or a moral argument, but simply because that's a big market out there waiting to be tapped. Develop a game that appeals across all demographics, male and female? You'd make a killing. Maxis sure did. You think developers aren't staring hard at the Sims, trying to figure out how they did it?

      And if I knew how to do it, I wouldn't just run about posting it on /..

      --
      Real Numbers - writing with a quantita
  16. Laura Croft wasn't about gender clash by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Laura Croft was about giving pubescent boys something to fantasize about.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Laura Croft wasn't about gender clash by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Lara Croft wasn't about gender clash. Lara Croft was about giving pubescent boys something to fantasize about.

      Right.

      And now that we've hit puberty, we've outgrown Lara. Alyx is so much more teh hawt.

      In the meantime, anyone got pics of Zoe?

    2. Re:Laura Croft wasn't about gender clash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here y'go:

      1 2 3 4 5

    3. Re:Laura Croft wasn't about gender clash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have some of that.

    4. Re:Laura Croft wasn't about gender clash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd hit it!

      /would make breakfast the next day, then hit it again

    5. Re:Laura Croft wasn't about gender clash by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Slow boobies day on Fark? >8p

  17. Funny... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
    No posts about video game girls with big boobs because all the slashdotters are drooling over new Mac hardware.

    And, no, I'm not new here.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:Funny... by Staos · · Score: 0

      Your UID begs to differ...

      --
      In Soviet russia, only old Koreans profit from pictures of Natalie Portman stored on Beowulf Clusters.
  18. I bet "girl games" would have girls on them too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you go to the magazine section and see all the silly men's magazines, they have pretty girls on them (occasionally men).

    When you look at the women's trashy magazines, they have pretty girls on them (occasionally men). You know, the ones that tell you how to make your butt smaller, charge your cell phone, run a fortune 500 company, and get that cute guy, all before lunch?

    1. Re:I bet "girl games" would have girls on them too by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      If you go to the magazine section and see all the silly men's magazines, they have pretty girls on them (occasionally men).

      Magazines like men's health and men's fitness seem to have almost exclusively men on the cover.

    2. Re:I bet "girl games" would have girls on them too by caranha · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know, this is indeed true.

      In Japan, there is this series, Tokimeki Memorial,
      where you play a guy who, in one school year, must
      make one of the girls of his social circle fall in
      love with him. It was a hugely suscessfull game,
      with 3 continuations.

      A few years ago, they released "Tokimeki Memorial:
      Girls Side", where the roles were reversed. The character was a girl, and had to have one of the boys in her social circle fall for her.

      And, unlike the other games, in this game the same-sex characters played a huge part, while in
      the "male" games, the male characters had pretty minor roles.

    3. Re:I bet "girl games" would have girls on them too by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      "When you look at the women's trashy magazines, they have pretty girls on them (occasionally men). You know, the ones that tell you how to make your butt smaller, charge your cell phone, run a fortune 500 company, and get that cute guy, all before lunch?"

      And that's something about society and demographics that needs to change too. No one said that that was right.
    4. Re:I bet "girl games" would have girls on them too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this surprising when 1/3rd of teenage females in developed countries have homosexual tendencies? Everywhere I look there're girls fondling each other.

  19. Dear Slashdot by Letter · · Score: 0
    Dear Slashdot,

    It's obvious: CmdrTaco needs only black boxes.

    Letter

  20. Oh heavens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now... We should be up in arms about it and let's pass some legislation banning the game manufacturers from using scantily clad women... *boo whoo* Women are so oppressed and exploited... Can't they find something else to cry about? How about pull some crap statistics out about how men make more than you do although men work regularly more hours than you do and work in more dangerous environments and that you CHOOSE to work in environments that give you flexibility for less hours and as result, less pay.

    1. Re:Oh heavens... by shawnywany · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sweetheart, take a sociology course. Even a basic one. There are structural boundaries for women in the workplace that often limit them to the 'traditional' feminine jobs--nursing, schoolteaching, etc. Glass escalators put men who would like to teach straight into administration; apparently women are not leaders. Glass walls stop women from moving out of customer service jobs, because apparently women have an innate caring side to them. Glass ceilings, of course, do not permit women to enter high management jobs, whereas men are injected into them daily. If it weren't for people like you, what with your arrogant bitching about how women choose to be exploited, feminism wouldn't exist. If there was complete gender equality, you'd be bitching about how blacks choose to be exploited because they choose to live in drug-infested urban areas.

    2. Re:Oh heavens... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      She who lives in "GLASS HOUSES" should cast no stones.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Oh heavens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, where is this glass house and do any women live there?

    4. Re:Oh heavens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you are such an 'enlightend' female, please answer for me the following questions I've pondering.

      If Females are so opressed socially, can you please explain to me what a female cross-dresser is wearing?

      Why is domestic violence such a serious issue, yet when a woman hits a man on a sitcom there is a laughtrack?

      Why do women complain about wanting equal pay when they expect the man to pay for the date, don't buy the engagement ring, and daddy (yet anoteher male) pays for the wedding?

      Why do women claim they are equal to men, yet when a man doesn't hold open the door for them they get miffed? Why is it when the female of a couple is carrying the heavier load, other women feel the need to 'set the man straight' about what he should be doing?

      Why is women with perfect bodies 'objectification of women', yet men with perfect bodies and thick muscles is 'playing to what men want' as well? (oh, cuz women like men with thick wallets.)

      Frankly, my dear, it is not your gender being opressed. In fact, I have to post this anonymously to prevent the karma backlash.

    5. Re:Oh heavens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to move to a blue state. Where I live (NY) my boss is a woman; she's been in IT since the primordial era when the PC was a new, startling thing; HER boss is a woman, who has ALSO been in IT forever; and they're both very effective (not to mention interesting people).

      If you look around the department I work in, a significant number of the programmers are girls. They're given a lot of responsibility -- just as much as any guy. And their pay is exactly the same.

      Seriously. Wherever you're living, you need to move.

    6. Re:Oh heavens... by shawnywany · · Score: 1

      Sure, that's your department and individuals you know. I am talking about on the whole, as statistics and culture shows.

    7. Re:Oh heavens... by shawnywany · · Score: 1

      I'll bite. 1. When clothes are the most important things in life, then this will be a relevant question. 2. Media is the biggest source of the female stereotypes today. 3. Feminism aims to change tradition. If you don't like traditional women, don't date them. I always go dutch on my dates and compromise with my partner, and some people are just so shocked by that. What women are you dating anyway? Getting pissed off about having to lay down some money for a date is pretty damn shallow, in my mind. 4. See number three. Also, I hold doors for guys, too. That's just courtesy. You must not be a very polite person if you don't hold the door for the person walking in front of you. And what, mind you, does this have anything to do with women in the workplace? You're just reinforcing negative stereotypes about women. Methinks you don't date much. 5. I don't even understand what you're saying here. Try rephrasing this. So let's see. You believe strongly in the stereotypes of women. I feel sorry for you. Perhaps if you stopped being so misogynistic and looked around and realized that women are just people, maybe you wouldn't have such adherence to tradition. The world is changing, as is the role of women. And I'm very sorry that you feel your karma is so threatened. Poor you.

    8. Re:Oh heavens... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Glass ceilings, of course, do not permit women to enter high management jobs, whereas men are injected into them daily.

      The correct spelling of "Glass Ceiling" is C-H-I-L-D-R-E-N. It's hard to have sympathy for the lack of achievement of people who cut themselves off at the knees.

    9. Re:Oh heavens... by shawnywany · · Score: 1

      Oops, I forgot about the line breaks. Apologies in advance.

    10. Re:Oh heavens... by shawnywany · · Score: 1

      Yes, I sort of agree. I feel bad for women who think it is their duty to shit a few children out because they think that's what women are for. Although, it is nice to see that women these days, as many statistics have shown, are staying in the workforce despite their kids, and are having them much later in life when the workload isn't as heavy.

    11. Re:Oh heavens... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Yes, I sort of agree.

      Wow, not the reaction I was expecting...

      I feel bad for women who think it is their duty to shit a few children out because they think that's what women are for.

      I tend to think that women prioritize social obligations over careers for evolutionary reasons that go way beyond western culture. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, as it may very well make them happier people, and I'm sure there are many men who have the same values. But, I think these values manifest themselves in these people failing to climb to the highest rungs of the career ladder.

      OTOH, if women stopped "shitting out children", it would mean the end of the human race.

      Although, it is nice to see that women these days, as many statistics have shown, are staying in the workforce despite their kids, and are having them much later in life when the workload isn't as heavy.

      Kids & career is still a compromise and they probably won't go as far in their career as they would have without kids. But this is their choice to make.

      OTOH, I think the most important factor for most mid-level careers is an education, and more women are getting university educations these days whereas more men are becoming low-achieving drop-outs. In the future, I think that women will have better jobs on average than men do. This trend has already begun to manifested itself with a majority of university students being women and marketers recognizing the importance of the disposable incomes of yuppie women.

    12. Re:Oh heavens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quaint. You previously point out societal factors limit a woman's opportunities in the workplace. When someone points out factors that are antagonistical to men, well, those should simply be ignored.

      If he should date someone else, can't you just work someplace else?

      I believe everyone manipulates situations to their own benefit. Excuse me if I don't cry for you.

    13. Re:Oh heavens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel bad for women who think it is their duty to shit a few children out because they think that's what women are for.

      That is what women are for. Coincidentally, it is also what men are for. Most of the other crap we spend our time on turns out to be equivalent to sitting at home masturbating.

    14. Re:Oh heavens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are lies, damn lies, and statistics"
      "Figures lie, liars figure"

      I've worked in a number of locations (six or seven in the past eight years alone), not just one organization. In every one, the female programmers were treated exactly like the male programmers. Like I said. Move to a blue state.

      My experience, by the way, is more valid than your collection of convenient statistics because they represent actual experience while your statistics are just something you read somewhere. You sound like a liberal arts major, all fired up about the injustice your professors are kvetching about (while conveniently ignoring the facts, i.e. A) they're female, B) they're professors with tenure, therefore more successful than most people in society, and C) they often have male assistants.)

      You're positing a political view which is designed to tilt all discourse in your favor. You're claiming statistics which are not bourne out by actual experience to tilt the discussion in your favor.

      Sorry, I call bullshit. Get out in the world and see how things really are, then come back and kvetch.

  21. Nope by radicalskeptic · · Score: 1

    It was while standing in my first-ever ladies' room line at E3 2004 as I pondered the Playboy bunnies, the return of Leisure Suit Larry, and the slew of buxom virtual ladies headlining each booth that I questioned whether the industry had evolved at all.

    As a devout Dead or Alive: Ultimate player, I can confidently say that...

    No, no it hasn't.

    --
    WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    1. Re:Nope by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      I call that the Chicks fighting game. I love it.

    2. Re:Nope by StyroCupMan · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have to agree that not much has changed. I realize why when I read a lot of the comments on /. which seem to be written by prepubescent, pr0n-addicted, socially backward males. Haha, no I'm not new here. And I don't subscribe to the "nerd" stereotypes.

      I think the anonymity of the internet has some positives, but also some real negatives as people make comments that they would never make to a person's face. For example, could you imagine a person running around your school or office holding up a picture of the goatse guy. Some behaviors are simply not tolerated in the "real" world but are laughed at on-line.

      I don't mean this as a flame, just an honest observation. I wish there was an easy answer, but as others have pointed out, sex sells. How do we expect the gaming companies to evolve when the gaming audiences are still so shallow?

      --
      If I may say so, life is a game, and there's so much to do and so few turns.
      -Reiner Knizia
    3. Re:Nope by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      And prepubescent acting, porn-addicted, shallow and socially backward wouldn't describe the average guy on the street?

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    4. Re:Nope by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      No, that would describe the *average human being*, I think.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  22. Getting The Woman Gamer by GweiLeong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You want the female gamer? Fine! Stop shoving corporate sellout Barbie lookalike clans like the FragDolls down their throat and give some real all-girl clans some press once in awhile. You know, the clans where the girls don't look like Playboy Bunnies.

    1. Re:Getting The Woman Gamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, fat chicks on the rag that can't run, and stop at the 7/11 to pick up a gallon of Haagen-Dasz? Oh, and with nice American taste in clothes, ie sweat pants with the word PRINCESS stamped on the massive butt-cheeks, and baby-dolls with the fake-pierced belly button hanging out?

      One day I was eating at the Vietnamese place, and this black chick walks by, about 350 pounds and 5 foot 4, with jogging pants written PRINCESS on the ass. The people at the table with me look at each other and I blurt out "Pacific Princess?"

      THE LOOOOVE BOAT

    2. Re:Getting The Woman Gamer by keebz · · Score: 1

      I agree. Being a girl gamer I've found it's easy to find guys that want to add you to their friend list because you're a girl who plays games, or guys to tell you to get back in the kitchen... Not so easy to find other girls to form a clan. I looked at the FragDolls and yeah, I'm sure they all got hired because they were the most talented...

    3. Re:Getting The Woman Gamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people at the table with me look at each other and I blurt out "Pacific Princess?"

      THE LOOOOVE BOAT


      I'm sure everyone in the restaurant understood that reference instantly.

  23. I am disappointed! by Gherald · · Score: 1

    I though it would be an actual game about Getting the Girl

  24. No mention of HL2? by neolith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought Alyx was a pretty well realized female character. Tough, feminine, sexy without being a slutty, smart as hell, and she even possessed a figure without Laura-Croftian... embellishments. I think it says positive things that the top game of the year has a female character that can stand up with the men in the game, and possibly has a future in her own game. I'd *love* to see an Alyx and DOG game, or just Alyx for that matter.

    Sure, you can find stereotypes in trashy games like BloodRayne and various fighters, but there are plenty of male stereotypes to be found over there as well.

    --
    Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com
    1. Re:No mention of HL2? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever seems to mention Joanna Dark, either.

    2. Re:No mention of HL2? by kdark1701 · · Score: 1

      I know! Joanna Dark was the Perfect female character. She didn't dress like a slut, she kicked ass, and she was hot. Sadly, it dosn't look like we're getting another Perfect Dark game. *sigh*

    3. Re:No mention of HL2? by FortranDragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another one would be Cate Archer from the No One Lives Forever series. The character's looks were based on the real life model Mitzi Martin.

      --
      "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
    4. Re:No mention of HL2? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I was pretty underwhelmed by HL2 (particularly the story) but even so I don't get why people are going so crazy for her. Her character wasn't particularly interesting, she didn't look anywhere near real enough for me to actually fancy her.

      I never like lara croft either tho so its probably just me.

    5. Re:No mention of HL2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, I mean Id much rather see a game with someone like Alyx in it. I mean, its a more 'believable' game for a start.

    6. Re:No mention of HL2? by neolith · · Score: 1

      I think the point is not that whether you "fancy" her or not, but the point is she is a non-exploitive female character in a game. No big tits, no skin tight leather, no navel piercings, no cowering or helplessness, no over the top "sass". Just a regular female freedom fighter in a post apocalyptic world. :-)

      --
      Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com
    7. Re:No mention of HL2? by Dracoirs · · Score: 1

      Uhhhhhh, Beyond Good and Evil? Jade???????? The best 'non-popular' game. Jade and Alyx even look similar.

    8. Re:No mention of HL2? by zx75 · · Score: 1

      "Tough, feminine, sexy without being a slutty, smart as hell, and she even possessed a figure without Laura-Croftian... embellishments."

      There in lies the problem though... she's distracting when I'm playing HL2 because that pretty much sums up the ideal of what I look for in a woman. And I pretty much thought the same things about Beyond Good & Evil, and I absolutely loved the game as well.

      Now, so-called "eye-candy" in games (Dead or Alive anyone?) are easy to tune out and concentrate on playing because that is all they are... and frankly "Laura-Croftian embellishments" are really not my cup of tea.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    9. Re:No mention of HL2? by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the Legend of Zelda release where Princess Zelda goes out and kicks some butt. One day Nintendo...one day...

    10. Re:No mention of HL2? by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Troll

      She's very androgynous. When I first saw her I thought she'd been created by a gay man yearning to turn her into a teenage boy.

      I think she appeals to boys who're terrified of women, and would prefer their female attributes (hips and breasts) weren't too prominent. And, of course, the closet fudgepackers, of which there seems to be quite a few in the geek crowd.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    11. Re:No mention of HL2? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      the point is she is a non-exploitive female character in a game. No big tits, no skin tight leather, no navel piercings, no cowering or helplessness, no over the top "sass". Just a regular female freedom fighter in a post apocalyptic world. :-)

      Thats not why boys talk about her is it ?

    12. Re:No mention of HL2? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1


      I think she appeals to boys who're terrified of women, and would prefer their female attributes (hips and breasts) weren't too prominent. And, of course, the closet fudgepackers, of which there seems to be quite a few in the geek crowd.


      Homophobic comments aside, I agree with you and am gald that someone else thinks the same as me.

    13. Re:No mention of HL2? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Guess I shoulda used "butt pirate" instead, eh?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    14. Re:No mention of HL2? by ksiddique · · Score: 1

      In the meantime you can enjoy Zelda kicking butt in the Smash Bros series of games!

    15. Re:No mention of HL2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever rocks your boat.

    16. Re:No mention of HL2? by rmoonsong · · Score: 1

      No big tits, no skin tight leather, no navel piercings, no cowering or helplessness, no over the top "sass".

      Is it just me or do most 20 something year old women fit into one or more of these catagories?

  25. Why should it evolve? by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What makes Ms. Flower's opinion about what characters in video games should look like, "more" valid than anyone else's?

    Nothing. Unfortunately, there are many more video game customers who would like their female characters to have cartoonishly large breasts than there are video game customers who would like their female characters to have folds and beards.

    The difference is that guys don't get their panties in a bunch because all of the male video game characters have cartoonishly large muscles.

    Ms. Flower is trying to manufacture a double standard where none exists - male and female characters are treated the same; they're made to look perfect.

    As for video game themes, Ms. Flower is simply outvoted. Our culture uses sex to sell. We sell stuff using attractive people, choosing gender based on audience. Complaining that video game conferences have booth babes is like complaining that there are no fat guys in soap operas.

    1. Re:Why should it evolve? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      What makes Ms. Flower's opinion about what characters in video games should look like, "more" valid than anyone else's?

      No one has said it's "more" valid. But it is equally valid. Thus you have the choice of either listening to her opinion, or ignoring it.

      You have chosen neither. You have chosen to try to make her opinion invalid in everyone else's mind, simply because it differs from yours.

      The difference is that guys don't get their panties in a bunch because all of the male video game characters have cartoonishly large muscles.

      DO you realize how foolish you sound, cavalierly using expressions like "get their panties in a bunch" in a discussion of gender politics?

      *sigh* Maybe it's naive of me to expect any enlightened discourse on this subject on Slashdot.

    2. Re:Why should it evolve? by canfirman · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ms. Flower is trying to manufacture a double standard where none exists

      I disagree. There is a double standard: it's ok for men to be objectified because nobody complains, but it's "wrong" for women to be objectified. And it's not limited to gaming. All forms of media (TV, magazines, books, billboards, etc.) have both sexes objectified, but you hear more complaints about scantily-clad women than bare chested men. I wonder if Ms. Flower has read any romance novels or seen any romatic movies and if she's offended by the objectification of the sexes there - especially the "handsome, tall, muscular" man.

      The objectification of the sexes to show the "perfect" model is everywhere. Every sane person knows that it does not represent the population at large.

      --
      It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
    3. Re:Why should it evolve? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I am *shocked*.

      Has nobody mentioned Mr. Mario yet? Sure he plays golf, and is sometiems a doctor, but damn it, he's certainly not 'buffed'.

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:Why should it evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > *sigh* Maybe it's naive of me to expect any enlightened discourse on this subject on Slashdot.

      This coming from someone whose /. username is "poot rootbeer"

      It's funny...laugh.

    5. Re:Why should it evolve? by zsz2k · · Score: 1

      Feminists have been shoving this same old shit down everybody's throats for decades -

      Yet now, when people are finally fed up with their bullshit and tell them to fuck off, feminasties turn around and accuse them of the same game they've been playing. Talk about a double standard here.

      There is a word for such a person in the English language: hypocrite.

    6. Re:Why should it evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more appropriate word, especially as it greatly irritates the subject of the description, is 'feminazi'. ;)

    7. Re:Why should it evolve? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Ms. Flower is trying to manufacture a double standard where none exists - male and female characters are treated the same; they're made to look perfect.


      You've missed a very interesting point - perfect to who? It's not that there is an impossible image. It's that this image is a distorted view from a male standpoint. Or is it? There are a couple interesting, if somewhat subtle, points to consider.

      First is that the author feels that there is a certain degree of misrepresentation to begin with. I'm not saying she's "right" per se - but it's not an unheardof view among female gamers.

      Second, females involved in producing some of these images defend these images and feel that they are actually positive or even well recieved That seems to be the author's point; suprise. Again - no right or wrong... just interesting. Of course, executives involved with Barbie see the product as a role model and there is certainly some disenting opinion on that.

      Finally, you'll note that among the featured female character models was one who wasn't all skimpy outfits and buxom bounce. Yet the model still represented a physical ideal (even as a toned-down example, the character still had physical atributes of a model or actress). It just wasn't the same ideal as all the others.
    8. Re:Why should it evolve? by raehl · · Score: 1

      You have chosen to try to make her opinion invalid in everyone else's mind, simply because it differs from yours.

      I have chosen to present her opinion as invalid because it is clearly wrong. Ms. Flower would have us believe that the gaming industry maintains a gender bias against women because girls in video games are hot and there are hot girls at vendor booths. Ms. Flower ignores that in order for a gender bias to exist, there must be an UNEQUAL treatment of people based on GENDER. This is not the case - the video game industry, as does the culture as a whole, has a bias towards ATTRACTIVE PEOPLE, regardless of gender.

      Correlation is not causation.

      As for the panties comment, I was just hoping for "+1 Skillful Placement of Troll Bait". How does it taste?

    9. Re:Why should it evolve? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      During any given month, the covers of Vogue and Cosmopolitan may be more erotic than Playboy.

      The "Lara Croft" syndrome isn't limited to people trying to "pander to adolescent boys". Allegedly feminist publications are actually holding women to a tougher and more unrealistic standard of beauty.

      Vogue and Cosmo are "skimp and buxom bounce" with pretense.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Why should it evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right!

    11. Re:Why should it evolve? by Polyhazard · · Score: 1

      okay, I just have to respond to the comments on here in the vein of "well, male characters have unrealistic muscles just as female characters have unrealistic breasts, so really they're equally objectified and anyone that says otherwise is whining."

      Consider this: large muscles are a symbol of strength and power, qualities that presumably are useful in most games. Ridiculously large breasts and wasp-waists serve no purpose but to appeal to the libinous fantasies of male players. I think this difference is relavant to the discussion.

      And for those guys out there who are getting defensive about "being blamed for objectifying women," this author isn't and feminist theory has never been about blaming one man or even a group of men for anything. The cultural tendancy to give women less symbolic power in most things is part of a large system outside the immediate control of individuals.

    12. Re:Why should it evolve? by tomboy17 · · Score: 1
      male and female characters are treated the same; they're made to look perfect.

      Not quite. "Ideal" men-as-sexual-objects are certainly muscular, but they're nothing like video game characters. The exaggeration of video-game characters is not really about sex appeal the goal is usually not to turn on the male audience's latent homoeroticism. Rather, the goal is to play to a fantasy of super-masculine power. The male video game character is not the object (the done-to, the looked-at), he is the uber- subject (the all-powerful, all-doing).

      The female characters, on the other hand, are mostly made to be looked at, whether that means pan-ins on flapping skirts or heaving breasts. Of course, many video games now have moved girls from "scenery" (a role I remember them in simple side-scrollers of the past) to fighting subjects, which makes for the often laughable scenario of seeing a woman designed to be done-to (fragile, thin, busty) doing the doing. To make the game playable, they have to make her reasonably powerful, but the power itself is laughable (as is the lack of sports bras!).

    13. Re:Why should it evolve? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      DO you realize how foolish you sound, cavalierly using expressions like "get their panties in a bunch" in a discussion of gender politics?

      No need to get your panties in a bunch about it. It's just an expression.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    14. Re:Why should it evolve? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      During any given month, the covers of Vogue and Cosmopolitan may be more erotic than Playboy.


      You should open the cover of Playboy. :P


      The "Lara Croft" syndrome isn't limited to people trying to "pander to adolescent boys". Allegedly feminist publications are actually holding women to a tougher and more unrealistic standard of beauty.

      Vogue and Cosmo are "skimp and buxom bounce" with pretense.


      Is Vogue and Cosmo feminist? Or do they pander to a cultural mindset set by aforementioned male perspective? Guys tend to be wired to like certain things (buxom babe included), and Cosmo promises to give their readers the tips needed to tap in to that psyche.

      Keep in mind my notes on Barbie. Matel's staff involved with the Barbie product includes quite a few females in various positions of seniority. I've seen quotes from these individuals expressing a belief in the positive image and role model of the Barbie characterization. Yet there is a reson Barbie is the butt of social commentary - not everyone believes the image is possitive.

      I'm not saying all this imagery is wrong or should be entirely wiped from our society. But we're fooling ourselves if we think the imagery being described has any semblance of an even treatment for both sexes.

      On a side note - I wonder how many posters claiming equal treatment or this being a non-issue have really talked to (or are) female gamers.
    15. Re:Why should it evolve? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Ms. Flower has read any romance novels or seen any romatic movies and if she's offended by the objectification of the sexes there - especially the "handsome, tall, muscular" man.

      Stereotype much?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    16. Re:Why should it evolve? by lamona · · Score: 1

      The difference is that guys don't get their panties in a bunch because all of the male video game characters have cartoonishly large muscles.

      Would they if the male video game characters had average muscles and HUGE SCHLONGS? I don't think anyone is complaining that the female character is idealized (i.e. long legs, perfect hair, pert nose). I think it's that breasts are sexual. So the equivalent would be for guys with bulging crotches, and maybe a bit showing. Which reminds me of the Heavy Metal cartoon "Den" in which both characters were naked, and both had very large sexual features. THAT was equal opportunity.

      --
      I just read /. for the amusing .sigs
    17. Re:Why should it evolve? by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      I'll make this quick.

      There are big-titted women on game covers because men think they're sexy.

      There are big-muscled men on game covers because men are encouraged by them.

      No wonder the guys aren't getting their panties in a bunch!

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    18. Re:Why should it evolve? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      I wonder if Ms. Flower has read any romance novels or seen any romatic movies and if she's offended by the objectification of the sexes there - especially the "handsome, tall, muscular" man.


      It would be interesting to hear her responce to this question. Having said that, I don't believe that's the point. It's not that there is objectification within the gaming industry. It's that it is nothing BUT objectification; the same cartoonish sexuality again and again.
    19. Re:Why should it evolve? by Desiderata · · Score: 1

      (FYI, I'm part of Slashdot's infinitesimal female population)I personally don't mind so called "perfect" women in video games as long as they're not overdone. Same thing with the men.
      Somehow slightly more subtle, sophisticated catering to our animal instincts appeals to me more. Incredibly buxom women with figures that cannot physically exist bother me because those are the kind of things you'd encounter in worse company. I'd like to think I'm above having some sort of nervous breakdown because I don't have the Barbie-like body the characters in some game do. Improbable bodies are just ridiculous, more demeaning to my intelligence than my value as a human being rather than as a sexual object.
      By the way, to all those who've been ranting about super muscular male figures in some games, my favorite character is Fenthick Moss, from NWN. He wasn't particularly buff, but he did go insane...

    20. Re:Why should it evolve? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Consider this: large muscles are a symbol of strength and power, qualities that presumably are useful in most games. Ridiculously large breasts and wasp-waists serve no purpose but to appeal to the libinous fantasies of male players. I think this difference is relavant to the discussion.

      That's just arguing semantics. The fact still remains that women tend to be huge hypocrites when it comes to looks.

      The cultural tendancy to give women less symbolic power

      Less symbolic power? Check out a sitcom, any sitcom. Chances are high that the men can't muster enough brain cells to keep breathing without help from the women on the show.

    21. Re:Why should it evolve? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      It's that it is nothing BUT objectification; the same cartoonish sexuality again and again.

      Pfft. Maybe if your game library consists of Rumble Roses and DOA Vollyball. Ludicrously broad generalization. This is just like the poeple who bitch about how women are drawn in comics, ignoring the fact that even guys who are supposed to look like the definitions of 98 lbs weaklings, like Bruce Banner and pre-spider bite Peter Parker, are ripped like Brad Pitt in fight club.

    22. Re:Why should it evolve? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      is 'feminazi'

      Yes, the one good thing that Rush Limbaugh has done for society, is creating the term feminazi.

    23. Re:Why should it evolve? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Maybe if your game library consists of Rumble Roses and DOA Vollyball. Ludicrously broad generalization.


      Care to point to the wide range of gaming tittles with main characters who are female and don't fit the buxom babe stereotype? Sure. There are a few - the article named one. But the point is that they're very few and far between.


      This is just like the poeple who bitch about how women are drawn in comics, ignoring the fact that even guys who are supposed to look like the definitions of 98 lbs weaklings, like Bruce Banner and pre-spider bite Peter Parker, are ripped like Brad Pitt in fight club.


      The ironic thing is that this objectification of the male form is a MALE-oriented view. Read my earlier post to which a (at least self-proclaimed) girl gamer had an interesting response. You might also want to pay attention to the female response in this thread.

      We might think that we're playing fair. But the truth is that the fantasy is wired for a single gender.
    24. Re:Why should it evolve? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      But the point is that they're very few and far between.

      Your basis for this assertion is...?

      Read my earlier post to which a (at least self-proclaimed) girl gamer had an interesting response. You might also want to pay attention to the female response in this thread.

      You might want to pay more attention to this post, which points out that just because women don't necessarily go for ripped guys doesn't mean they objectify any less. For that matter, saying that girls go for super-muscled guys is a complete red herring, because no one was saying that in the first place.

      The ironic thing is that this objectification of the male form is a MALE-oriented view.

      Again, your basis for this is?

      But the truth is that the fantasy is wired for a single gender.

      Yeah, if you have to pick one, its no contest: it's wired for women. The next time you're buying groceries, check out the romance novels. Check out the beefcakes that are invariably drawn on the covers. Check out which gender buys said romance novels. Then check out all the fantasy novels written for women by women. Then come to the realization that you are a wuppie pussy, and haven't yet caught on to the fact that women are every bit as capable of sexism, arrogance, chauvinism and violence as men.

    25. Re:Why should it evolve? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Your basis for this assertion is...?


      This would be where I asked:

      Care to point to the wide range of gaming tittles with main characters who are female and don't fit the buxom babe stereotype?



      You might want to pay more attention to this post, which points out that just because women don't necessarily go for ripped guys doesn't mean they objectify any less. For that matter, saying that girls go for super-muscled guys is a complete red herring, because no one was saying that in the first place.


      Yet the game industry isn't full of objectified male stereotypes with "'Im oh so sensitive and affected' eyebrows" as mentioned in your linked post. The image is the ripped, super-muscle charater which panders to a male-oriented characterization. Odd that even prime-time TV is capable of showing a wider range than the gaming industry.

      I may have miscommunicated my message with over-use of the word "objectification". So let me restate it. It's not an issue that people are objectified. It's that a particular form of objectification is so common. That form is from a male-oriented perspective. What do I base this on? Conversations with female posters, which happen to fall in line with one of the posts I linked to.


      Yeah, if you have to pick one, its no contest: it's wired for women. The next time you're buying groceries, check out the romance novels. Check out the beefcakes that are invariably drawn on the covers. Check out which gender buys said romance novels. Then check out all the fantasy novels written for women by women.


      Wait - your counter-example is trashy romance novels? There are slews of pop novels out there that cover a wide range of characterizations. The romance novel is a rather small example. And even at that point - the draw of the romance novel is the text within, not the cover art.


      Then come to the realization that you are a wuppie pussy, and haven't yet caught on to the fact that women are every bit as capable of sexism, arrogance, chauvinism and violence as men.


      You might want to relize that name-calling is a good indication that you're lacking the maturity to have this kind of conversation. Grow up a bit.

      Note that nowhere do I claim that women are not capable of sexism, arrogance, chauvinism, or violence. And, on that note, nowhere do I claim that any of this objectification is bad per se (hey - I like buxom babes). The point is that this objectification is a lot more one-sided than many seem to realize.
  26. So the news is.... by Kylere · · Score: 1

    Pretty People sell better than Ugly ones!

    Makes sense we have a Chippendale Dancers, not Chubendales. I hate it when the logical and factual is presented as new thought.

  27. pink-boxes-not-needed department? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that the same as I'm-a-flaming-homosexual department?

  28. Equal Opportunity by krgallagher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't get it. Laura Croft is a stereo type and Duke Nukem isn't? C'mon people, almost all the male characters in games are steroid pumped jocks. What's worse most of them are blond haired blue eyed Aryan types. Unless you are playing an RPG and playing a barbarian or a dwarf you are playing a buffed character. If you are playing barbarian or dwarf the female is as un-buff as the male. Sounds like equal opportunity to me.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

    1. Re:Equal Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Equal opportunity is far too often shouted about but not listened to. Take a look at all that advertising that depicts men and being simple and easilly fooled blah blah woman gets the last laugh *sigh* its a complete farce. men just dont stand up for themselves, and maybe we all should.

    2. Re:Equal Opportunity by painehope · · Score: 1

      What's worse most of them are blond haired blue eyed Aryan types

      Pardon me? And there is something wrong with being white? Oh, yeah, I forgot, we need diversity! The major game markets in the world are Western ( US, Europe - might as well classify that as one region, as some of the countries are smaller than the county I live in ), Middle Eastern ( largely Muslim ), and Asian. We're not even going to include Africa, because as far as I'm concerned, you could nuke that continent to hell and back and the world would be a better place ( lower HIV/AIDS statistics, free diamonds, no more idiotic Ministers of Health ranting and raving about HIV/AIDS being a conspiracy between white people and aliens ). Probably don't have much time for video games anyways, between the raping and killing campaigns they seem to go on regularly.

      So, let's go to Japan, China, or Korea and see what they have - gee, an entirely different culture and - hold onto your panties here, kids - game characters that embody the traits of their culture. I'm not sure if the Middle East has video games, nor do I give a fuck. They ( as a culture ) stopped advancing quite some time ago. If they didn't sit on oil, everyone would be happy to let them and the Jews get on with the business of killing each other. So guess what - Western ( I could use the terms white or Aryan, but not all Western culture is arguably white ( Greek, Spanish, etc. ), and even less of it is of Aryan descent ) culture has video games that embody the traits that we collectively value ( some games require N-depth problem-solving abilities - albeit there's few of these -, muscles, fantasy adventures, guns, cars, attractive women, etc. ). I admit that there might be a lack of games with a female main character that isn't a big-breasted gun-toting half-vampire or whatever badass. But you know what - it's not a goddamn crisis like everyone makes it out be. I get sick and tired of people whining about how this group or that group is repressed/under-represented or whatever. There's a reason why women aren't represented much in the gaming industry - they're currently a small portion of it. But if things like the Sims keep being such a big hit, they will see games tailored towards a more "female" audience. And then games oriented towards women will become a major segment of the market.

      So, to close with the point I started with : you ( and others like you ) need to shut your politically correct mouths up. The rest of us, who just want to get on with our lives, have enough problems to worry about other than the fact that our culture and country bother people who live here, take our handouts, and then say we're oppressing them. If blacks/hispanics/asians/anyone are under-represented in our culture, start doing something noteworthy ( Asians have! ) to make a spot for yourself ( note : dealing crack doesn't count ) or shut the fuck up and die. Oh yeah, and please tell me exactly what fucking church Jesse Jackson is a reverend for?

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  29. Duke Nukem! by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

    Just wait until Duke Nukem Forever for some more female/male steriotypes.

  30. Why? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Who needs a girlfriend when you can have a $499 iMac? Come on people, let's start to see some proper geek priorities!!

    (Disclaimer: comment is firmly tongue-in-cheek. Turn the damn computer off and go outside once in a while.)

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up -- despite your pathetic effort, you're not funny.

  31. frag me, baby by revxul · · Score: 1

    The female character in the webcomic Ctrl-Alt-Del [link: ctrlaltdel-online.com] is any male gamer's dream.

    --
    Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
    1. Re:frag me, baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy Wintereenmas!

  32. Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing that I'm really liking about Nintendo is that they seem adamant about acquiring new markets for their products... the DS in particular - many women have taken to the device, loving games like Feel The Magic and the Mario 64 DS minigames... The new method of input is a lot easier for newbie gamers to grasp than, say, an Xbox controller with god knows how many different buttons on it. Instead of relying on the tried and true 12-25 male market, I'm really glad Nintendo has been wanting to branch out more.

    Most people seem to think that just because girls don't want to play these violent FPSes and GTA clones that are rampant at the moment, they will never be interested in games. But I know quite a few girls who are into games, including my girlfriend... but the kind of games they play - The Sims, (thing) Tycoon, puzzlers, and many Japanese RPGs, is pretty different from what's currently popular with your typical casual male gamer.

    I think the best way to get more girl gamers is to have more girls producing games... Feel The Magic is a hit with the ladies, and it was headed up by 2 women. Plus, The Greatest Game Series Ever was headed up by a woman :)

    1. Re:Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't play videogames. It's to expose you as a nerd and eliminate you as a possible mate.

    2. Re:Nintendo... by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I dunno about that. Besides the Sims, GTA is the game that the most women I know play. It's the open-endedness that does it, I think. My sister, especially, can spend hours and hours driving around and running people over. The only other games she's ever really liked to play were The Sims (of course), Katamari Damacy (got her to stop playing GTA to try it), and F-Zero (way back in '92).

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
  33. Great, All Fem Gamers are HOT CHICKS! by Musenik · · Score: 1

    After scanning the article and reading the summation, it looks like the greatest majority of women gamers have been completely ignored. Look again, Ms. Flower, look at the casual market and find that women over thirty five represent nearly half of ALL computer gamers. It's not like there's a lack of positive women role models presented in games. They're just not easy to find, because the gaming industry is still sucking up to hard-core players. (for which I'm actually half grateful, because I want more RPGs) Fortunately, mobile games and casual games are just starting to turn big heads like EA, MS, Sony, and Nintendo.

    1. Re:Great, All Fem Gamers are HOT CHICKS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendos head is "just" starting to turn to mobile gamers?

  34. Lora Croft was not created for girls by geekoid · · Score: 1

    it was created for 13 year old boys.

    Also, how can you say there is a line at the womens room for the first time, and in the same breath wonder if the industry has/is changing.
    Clearly, you observations dictate that it is changing.

    Please remember the men respond to visual stimuli much stronger then women, so the 'sexy' woment will be selling products to men in nearly all industries. Whether its a women presenting a new automobile, or a huge breasted digital creation.

    Any toy seller will tell you that different toys will appeal to different genders. Believe me, Mattell would love to sell barbie to boys.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Lora Croft was not created for girls by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1
      Also, how can you say there is a line at the womens room for the first time, and in the same breath wonder if the industry has/is changing. Clearly, you observations dictate that it is changing.
      Clearly there were less cubicles in the ladies at E3 2004 than E3 2003, thus increasing the queue size and leading you to BELIEVE that the industry is changing. Or they were marketing more soft drinks to the women in 2004. Maybe it's both, if *I* were tryign to show people that the industry was changing that's what I'd do!

      Pass me my hat would you? It's the shiny one.
      --
      FGD 135
    2. Re:Lora Croft was not created for girls by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

      Also, how can you say there is a line at the womens room for the first time

      Actually, I read this different. The original poster said, "It was while standing in my first-ever ladies' room line..." I took this to mean that this was the poster's first ever ladies' room line, probably indicative of the completion of his surgery. Now that he's post-op and feeling like a real woman, (s)he feels it is his/her duty as a woman to start complaining about women's rights.

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    3. Re:Lora Croft was not created for girls by hawk · · Score: 1

      Any toy seller will tell you that different toys will appeal to different genders. Believe me, Mattell would love to sell barbie to boys.

      It's called "G.I. Joe"

      Coming up with the naame "action figure" was the breakthrough that made this possible (seriously, but you can google the hitlory as well as I can).

      hawk

    4. Re:Lora Croft was not created for girls by karnal · · Score: 1

      Clearly there were less cubicles in the ladies at E3 2004

      Ouch. Them's some huge and talented ladies.

      --
      Karnal
  35. Moot point by Marvelicious · · Score: 1

    Fine, early 20's late 20's... I'm 29 and I still like tits! As long as the market they sell to is predominately male, hot women help sell it.

    --
    Send whiskey and fresh horses!
  36. Prehistory by ElDuque · · Score: 1


    What about Rosella? (Kings Quest IV anyone)

    First female videogame main character?

    The article also doesn't mention Roberta Williams who I seem to remember being pretty instrumental down at Sierra.

    1. Re:Prehistory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What about Rosella? (Kings Quest IV anyone)

      That game is what, 15 years old? Roberta Williams doesn't even work in the industry anymore, let alone Sierra.

      There's also Syberia (1 and 2) and Beyond Good and Evil. Still counting on one hand.

      Of course it's not as if most characters have any personality. Someone mentioned Gordon Freeman. He's a box model, fer chrissakes, you see him in an occasional reflection. He doesn't even speak. Ever.

    2. Re:Prehistory by orcus · · Score: 1

      KQ IV is what actually got my wife interested in computer games way back when.
      The fact that the protagonist was female was very important to her.

      And don't forget - that before Lara Croft, there was Laura Bow!

      --
      First they burn books, then they burn people.
  37. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL I AM TEH MODIFY W1K1P3DIA ENTRY FOR TEH HUNS... LOL OMG CHINKS R G3HY.

    m/> will auto-link a URL
    Important Stuff

    # Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might b

  38. Screw the Girl Gamers! by robocrop · · Score: 0
    Thank God I'm not the only person who's sick of this bullshit. It is so tiring to constantly hear how it is of the utmost importance that we change everything to try to include people who don't want to be included.

    If a bunch of girls are really pissed that there are no games for them to play, they'll get together and make a game. If they do, good for them. Otherwise get off our fucking case. Just because it doesn't cater to your every whim doesn't mean it's sexist.

  39. of course not by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that would disprove her point.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  40. True by alienfluid · · Score: 1

    This is definitely true - I was pretty aghast looking at some of the advertisements on TV about the new games coming out - "Rose Rumble" and "Grand Theft Auto - San Andreas" being some of the them. The image of women in games has been reduced to that of a "whore" who is expendable and there only for pleasure. Very distrubing and unfortunate.

    Please help me infect my machine at 139.147.8.100
    I need to test virus/worm scanners on it!!

    1. Re:True by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The image of women in games has been reduced to that of a "whore" who is expendable and there only for pleasure. Very distrubing and unfortunate.

      I don't know about "Rose Rumble", but your comment about GTA: SA is entirely off-base. GTA: SA is a gangster simulator. The women in the game are whores, not because they are women, but because they are prostitutes. The main character is a two-bit crook, again, not because he's a man, but because he's a criminal! And that's perfectly logical, because the thing that GTA: SA simulates, the criminal underworld, is actually like that. I live in Atlanta, and if you walk around Midtown at night, you'll see your fair share of hookers and strip-joints. Representing that reality in a game is not demeaning to women at all, unless the women in question is a hooker or a stripper!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:True by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      Really, the hos are a major selling point for women. All the girls I know love to run around beating hookers to death. The first time my sister played GTA3, that's all she did for hours. Same with my girlfriend's little sister. She loved it.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
  41. Lack of Female Developers/designers? by kevinx · · Score: 1

    The video game development landscape is populated by mostly men. Until more females become interested in creating the content you won't see females being portrayed the way "females" want.
    On another note, there isn't any difference between this and other media outlets. TV/movies and music videos work the same way. Even the female leads in these projects know how to sell a product.
    I'm going to even throw in a reference to porn here. I was watching a thing on TV where they talked how they used to use average men in videos because they felt they would identify. But then they realised that "sexy" men sold more. People want to be transported into the fantasy.
    Is the game industry immature? Or is it just being realistic?

  42. Zoe's website by khasim · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Zoe's website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Better yet www.zoeflower.com. Nice pics of the little hottie ;-).

    2. Re:Zoe's website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      And videos too!

    3. Re:Zoe's website by djp928 · · Score: 1

      Wow, this is great. An article gets posted about the objectification of women in games. Naturally it's written by a woman. So the slashbots find her website. And her pictures. And proceed to objectify her.

      Tell me again why games objectify women...?

      -- Dave

    4. Re:Zoe's website by sjalex · · Score: 1

      because it sells, duh

  43. What a disappointment! by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Funny

    After reading the title i thought the article would actually be useful to us (the stereotypical /. reader). Turns out its about selling video games to girls, laaaaaame.

  44. Forget appearances by shawnywany · · Score: 1

    It makes you wonder what would happen if there were a game that does not base its characters on appearance, but rather on personality and actul character. (Oh wait, that's the Sims, and that's called a chick game too.) What would you guys say about Metroid Prime? I'm not a game geek by any means--but I didn't Samus Aran was female. What does that say about traditional female game characters? I know it genuinely confused my fellow game-illiterate friends and me.

  45. All stereotypes are negative by caffiend666 · · Score: 1

    All stereotypes are negative. Male/Female Adult/Child White/Black. This reviewer is complaining more about the mis-interpretation of women in liesure suit larry. However, she does not chose to object to the image of a letcherous man as the main character.

    Name one positive stereotype in games? The humans in Warcraft are xenophobes on a witch hunt. Samurai in fighting games are mad blood thursty freaks. Even mushrooms are misinterpreted and are misleading in Mario. The message is "Here kids, eat a mushroom, do cool things...."

    Non-stereo typical themes in culture do not do well. Not only are they hard to do, they lack interesting alliteration and feeling.

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
  46. Re:Clans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gee, your post made me feel old ( 28 ).

    I don't have the slightest idea what FragDolls are, and have only a vague notion that Clans must be teams in online games ( the kind that make you shell out a monthly fee and which I will therefore never play ).

    Can't you make your own 'Clans' as long as you don't make white sheets the uniform?

  47. Yet another boring "girl gamer" article... by Caiwyn · · Score: 2

    Oh, God, yet another ponderous article on "Women In Video Games." Doesn't anyone find the use of words like "empowering" and "disenfranchises" the least bit ironic? Doesn't this kind of overanalysis take the fun out of video games? And doesn't ascribing this sort of importance to them lend credence to the arguments of those want to restrict/ban certain titles?

    What's more, the article is embarassing to read. This is little more than a female journalist injecting gender politics into everything she sees. It reeks of self-importance and psych 101. I don't disagree with many of the statements and conclusions throughout the article, but they are largely redundant and do not bear repeating.

    The only thing that needs to be stated here is that if/when females constitute enough of a demographic for the industry to address, they will help determine the industry's direction when it comes to content and subject matter. Sometimes, they already do. This isn't rocket science.

  48. san andreas by chris_morgan47 · · Score: 1

    all i know is i'm glad they added blonde hookers with pigtails and plaid skirts.

  49. The real key by Omnicrola · · Score: 1
    As a man, I can't say this with any true degree of certainty, but if you want to know what truely brings women into the gaming scene, it's not neccessarily the games so much as the people playing them.

    All the girls I know that play games (some of them geeks, some not) like to play any game that involves social interaction. Either with friends they know in RL, or on another continent. And if they can meet new people that they can then meet in RL, they're even more into it. Game design, plot, and story as always play a significant role. Being able to meet people and either Role Play with them, or just get to know them, ask how they and their friends are doing on a daily/weekly basis however, plays a much more central role for women than men.

    More girls I know play MMOs or the yahoo table games than anything else.

  50. A Little Older by lbmouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everywhere I've read, the average age of video game buyers is 36.

    1. Re:A Little Older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everywhere I've read, the average age of video game buyers is 36.

      ...buyers.

      Buyers and players are not always the same people.

    2. Re:A Little Older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who buy it, yes. What about people who play the games, though?

    3. Re:A Little Older by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      The previous sentence in the article you linked says that the average age of players is 29, which indicates the fact that most games kids play are purchased for them by their parents.

      At any rate, you could adjust the GP's post to say "12-34" and the point would remain the same. Thirtysomething men aren't any less obsessed with tits and ass than teenagers are, they just have other things distracting them (and years to get used to the hormones).

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  51. Ask a silly question... by pla · · Score: 1

    ...the slew of buxom virtual ladies headlining each booth that I questioned whether the industry had evolved at all.

    Well of course the industry has evolved!

    Thanks to the adoption of video game ratings, the "M" rating has greatly increased the "strongly suggestive" content in games, while the "AO" rating has made publishers not worry about releasing outright porn in games.

    If you don't call that an improvement, well, I don't know what you expect. You want your "weeners" tag to go along with "boobies"? Get enough females interested in gaming to make it marketable, and I guarantee you'll see equality in video game sexual content. You only see females "exploited" (though in this case, can you even call it exploitation when it doesn't involve any real women?) because the target market consists almost entirely of horny young men. Add horny young women as a target demographic, and software houses will jump at the chance to pander to them for a buck.

    But then, that presupposes the entire title of this topic, doesn't it?

  52. I for one welcome our fat bearded overlordesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, there are many more video game customers who would like their female characters to have cartoonishly large breasts than there are video game customers who would like their female characters to have folds and beards.

    Keep the faith, brother! Until then we'll survive on furry pr0n of the more deviant variety.

  53. Getting the what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bit of an unlikely title for a /. article, no?

  54. I agree with SOME of this by ZWarrior · · Score: 1

    I run a company that does LAN parties and online gaing events. Although we are not to the scale of other events, we do get a fair share of people in the doors.

    Attracting the female gamer is something like hunting the mythical beasts or yore sometimes. But the number of female gamers that attend is always low. The only time we see a larger number is when we attend a party sponsored by the local university. Then we see the ladies that are gamers with their boyfriends only. For the most part this 43% is not showing up in person, but only online.

    Although I agree that the "beautiful people" stereotype swings both ways, I question the need for the female characters to wear next to nothing, where as the male characters are fully clothed and heavily armed.

    Hmm, I think we still have a long way to go.

    --
    Here I come to save the da... *thud*
    I gotta get me a shorter cape.
  55. I look like Duke Nukem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a glandular problem, you insensitive clod!

  56. observations out of context by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    it makes perfect sense for women to make advances in terms of equality in salary, freedom from sexual harassment, respect in sports, etc.

    i mean just look at michelle wie in golf: this chick (yes, chick, not woman- she's 15 yo) is going to break up the male-only PGA... that's wonderful, and it's also real palpable progress: if she can swing a golf club, who cares what her sex is, let her play golf on equal footing, and she will, and she will beat the masters!

    this is the real world, this is real progress

    however, video games are a fantasy world

    the male mind hasn't changed in thousands of years

    it makes perfect sense, in fact, that women characters in video games played by men should get even more outlandish as time goes on: it's fantasy

    reality versus fantasy

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:observations out of context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your trolls are less blatant here than on k5, why is that?

    2. Re:observations out of context by zsz2k · · Score: 1

      Of course if she doesn't, everybody will focus on how stressed out she was (or in some other way excuse the fact that she failed to win).

      Also, nobody will dare to point out the glaringly obvious fact that the best player will almost always be a man. "Not enough female participation yet?" What, 40 years of oppression by feminism (see title IX, which - thanks to feminasties - has turned male athletics into a wasteland) has not yet been enough to "equalize the playing field?" Maybe - just maybe - that's because men and women aren't and won't ever be equals? You'd think?

      And if you think that's sexist, let me remind you that you just posted an article hyping the fact that a girl is going to "break up the male-dominated PGA."

  57. Stevie Case would agree! by mtDNA · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Stevie Case would agree with you. She says as much in her Playboy interview.

    --


    If you watch TV news, you know less about the world than if you just drank gin straight from the bottle.
  58. Re:Zoe Flower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding... Zoe Flower is definitely a man writing under a pen name. A sad, sad man.

  59. What about Far Cry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That game is awful girly, with the beautiful plants and flowers and all the pretty birds. Sounds like toots is in desperate need a beef injection if you know what I'm saying.

  60. back in 1970 by foobsr · · Score: 1

    At the end of Little House Zappa makes some quick replies to a heckler in the crowd. The guy shouts something like "Take off that fucking uniform before it's too late!" (possibly talking to a security guard that can be heard trying to get people to get back in their seats), and Frank replies "Everybody in this room is wearing a uniform, don't kid yourself". The heckler continues shouting, and eventually Zappa just says "You'll hurt your throat. Stop it."

    http://home.epix.net/~eichler/reviews/zappa/burntw ee.htm

    Hmm.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  61. Spatial Coordination by ATN · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I find that the actual interface for video games is more geared towards males. Most games involve a lot of hand eye coordination and spacial recognition. Tracking multiple objects at once and such. Correct me if I'm wrong as I'm no expert on the subject but I believe males are generaly more adapt in these area's. And from my experience intruducing females to games they tend to get frustrated quickly with the controls. Games that I have had success getting females involved in are games like karaoke revolution, and "The sims" seems to be extremely popular with the ladies. I think perhaps the way in which users interact with games is as big a proplem in attracting females as the actual content.

    1. Re:Spatial Coordination by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong as I'm no expert on the subject but I believe males are generaly more adapt in these area's.

      If you believe this, you probably also believe that blacks are naturally superior athletes and/or dancers due to "a larger proportion of fast-twitch muscle fiber."

    2. Re:Spatial Coordination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not certain on any correlation of hand-eye coordination to gender or muscle mass to race (or whatever term you want to use), but women learn to read faster and men are generally better at higher math. On the same vein black people (specifically people with dark skin) generally have taller bodies to help the dispersion of heat so you could argue they're better at sports because of their natural height and ability to expel excess heat.

      The main point being why can't there be evolutionary/physical reasons that some people are better at certain things because of their genes and gender?

    3. Re:Spatial Coordination by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      well, buh? Blacks are naturaly better at *some* athletic events , its pretty indisputable, people are just too political correct to say it, just look at the 100 metres. The idea that race or sex has absolutle no effect on any physical abilites is the stupidest idea ever, its so plainly false.

    4. Re:Spatial Coordination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Shrug* I don't think it's inaccurate to suppose that some alleles are more common in different "races" or genders.

      For example, males build muscle better than women. (Though some hard-core feminists would dispute that idea.)

      Here's a few genetic variations that affect us as people. If these genetic variations are more common in one population than another (just like blood types are more common in one race than another), it can explain some things. (Not that we should be so quick to assume a difference in races is based on genetics or hormones.)

      http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4092
      http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn332
      http://chealth.canoe.ca/channel_health_news_detai l .asp?channel_id=40&menu_item_id=4&news_id=10982

    5. Re:Spatial Coordination by cqnn · · Score: 1

      Wrong... you fell for the logical trap.

      Unless you want to claim that *all* Black people, regardless of external factors, would be better
      at the 100 metre dash that members of any other ethnic group, at any time.

      To say that a few people (who happen to be Black) have leveraged their natural ability with
      extensive practice and training to become prominent within thier chosen field would be
      closer to the truth.

      I know just as many Blacks, Whites, Latinos, and Asians who have quite a talent for sitting
      on thier collective butts; but its not something I'd claim that any race has a particular
      aptitude for.

    6. Re:Spatial Coordination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tracking multiple objects at once"?

      That's not a male superiority, I can say for sure after seing women tracking two or three kids while at the same time cooking three different things and talking to a visitor. A guy on the other hand (and that I know from experience) trying to cook only two things simultaniously, even without the kids or visitors, would probably burn at least one of them.

  62. Sex sells by Dikeman · · Score: 1

    What else is new? We knew that allready, and why would the gaming industry be different?

    Take a look at MTV and you see exactly the same thing, lots of barely clothed chicks.

    And women don't get massively offended by it. Apparently sex sells regardless of the comsumer's gender.

    women see something they wanna look similar to and men see something they want.

    1. Re:Sex sells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and some sell sex -- it's a two way street.

  63. Re:Most "cool" girls are lesbians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so your bragging that you get lesbian girls by looking and acting gay?

  64. The answer is obvious by popcultureicon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    When discussing a topic such as gender profiling, one is forced to resort to flagrant generalizations, so apologies in advance.

    My belief is that there is a small set of games that appeal primarily to males, a large set of games that appeal to both males and females, and again another small set that appeals primarily to females. So far, the vast majority of games have used violent conflict as a central progression indicator. This includes everything from duck hunt to Doom 3. I believe this sort of game falls under the category of being primarily enjoyed by males. It is the auxiliary features that distinguish each game within this theme and make it interesting.

    Lately I have started playing World of Warcraft, which, at its essence, is merely another way of slaying endless adversaries. The rewards are different, and the audio/visuals and networking are different, but it's still about killing things. Now I would be willing to bet (without knowing the actual player demographics) that the vast majority of WoW players are male.

    Now, in my opinion again, not only does this concentration on one type of game lead to unbalanced player demographics, but it also leads to a severe draught of innovative and fun games. From the perspective of a male, female gamers most likely just want "fun" and "innovative" games. They don't care if the lead character (if there is one) is a strong female or how big her boobs are, and they don't want to only ever play the Sims. I think when developers find time to give up on striving for better graphics, better physics, and better gore simulation and instead try to make a game that is not a puzzle game that doesn't involve violence of any sort (not because it's offensive, but because it's been done ad nauseum) then female gamer numbers will just rise of their own accord. No need to be targetted by a marketing department. Male and females can even play the same games! Imagine that, just like they enjoy lots of the same movies!

    Why does the game industry as a whole have this fixation on violent games? Well recently, I would imagine it's because companies don't like to take risks, and violent games are a proven formula. But why in the first place did everyone have this obsession? Well, my guess is that because games were always terribly constrained by the hardware on which they were running, some sacrifices needed to be made to the gameplay in order to have a complete game. Conflict is easy to simulate. There are two statuses I can think of: winner and loser. Alive and dead. How binary. But now we have machines capable of simulating much more and yet we don't. Anyway, that's my take on why we still do so many violent games.

  65. Women's mag bias by gammoth · · Score: 2

    I'd like to remind Ms Flowers that the women's mag industry values wealth over character in potential husbands, and places a premium on physique on playmates for the female's sexual-awakening-years.

    It's the way of biology and thousand's of years of evolution, and a few years' liberation.
  66. Booth Babes by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do booth babes sell product? I can recall only two sets of booth babes at a LWCE. The first was the BSD Daemon Babe, Cerwin Ercen. She remains popular to this day. But her popularity has more to do with her geekiness, ordinariness, and her obvious play on the booth babe stereotype. Cerwin as a booth babe is clever hack. It's screaming to an unlistening world that you don't have to be a lobotomized and plasticized supermodel from the pages of Playboy to look sexy.

    But at that same expo there was another set of booth babes (and a couple of booth studs for "balance"). They were the epitome of the stereotype. What booth was this? Frankly, I can't remember. These people were so out of place at the convention that even the models looked embarassed.

    They didn't show up at the next show.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:Booth Babes by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they make sales, but they do get people into your booth. As the salesmen at one company I used to work for discovered. The first day of the show nobody stopped at their booth, so they hired some booth babes figuring that they might as well have something to look at while they are bored. Because of the booth babes the booth was packed. I don't know if it caused any sales, but next time you see booth babes remember they are the salesmen's hedge against boredom in an empty booth, and not an attempt to get you there.

    2. Re:Booth Babes by cqnn · · Score: 1

      To the parent poster, I'll bet they did show up at the *next show*,
      just perhaps not the show you personally went to next.

      I wouldn't be surprised to find quite a market for "spokespeople-for-hire"
      to stock at show booths both to have a few more attractive people
      representing your company, and to give a greater impression of size
      for your business. Since most companies cannot afford to send their
      best engineers out of town for a whole week to gladhand the public;
      when 95 percent of the questions that get asked can be replied to
      from the sales brochures.

      And from experience, booth babes increase sales (or at least sale opportunities)
      as well as relieve boredom. I have a friend I tend to follow around trade show
      floors just for that reason, while he goes ga-ga over a pretty girl, I check
      whether thier presence is a cover for a lack of specific information on the
      companies products, or a teaser to get you in close enough to deliver the
      regular marketing pitch.

    3. Re:Booth Babes by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I don't know about booth babes, but I remember hanging out in the Slashdot area a lot because one of the guys' GFs was gorgeous. My cousin spent a long time trying to flirt with her.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
  67. Wanna get the girl??? (in real life???) by vudufixit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Then... Don't be a nice guy. I don't mean be a jerk or an a-hole, just don't go out of your way to be nice to a woman. Don't put her up on a pedestal. Don't be anxious to call back (hint: if they really like you a lot, they'll wonder what's going on and call you). I've read a lot of material on what women like and what they don't like - looks help, but true self-confidence is the true attractant. Fellas, I'm no prize in the looks dept, but when I was a 16 yr old pimply virgin, if I went back in time and showed pix of some of the women I've dated/slept with, I wouldn't have believed it. It was just a matter of knowing myself better and becoming more confident. There's someone for everyone, guys. It's a numbers game - don't settle.

    1. Re:Wanna get the girl??? (in real life???) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not going to RTFA, at least RTFDescription. This has nothing to do with anything, and now you're going to get all the nerds on slashdot to share their boring-ass "nice guys finish last" stories.

    2. Re:Wanna get the girl??? (in real life???) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double your dating sure is helpful, eh? I fully agree with you.

  68. Trying to avoid this kind treatment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the reason more women don't flock to gaming and other online enjoyments is because of the treatment they get. Sites like this don't really do a lot to dissipate stereotypes or objectification of women. But damn she's got a nice ass!

  69. TWEEEET!!!!! PENALTY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Two minutes penalty for failing to write 'DEFINATELY'. On the bench with you!

    Free shot for spelling DISTRUBING, a nice Freudian slip.

  70. Double standard? by Jaywalk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why are so many people getting so bent about the idealized standard of femininity? The men in these games are no more realistic. Look at Duke Nukem. Or the characters from Mortal Kombat. Is the male physique any less well-developed than the female? Why the surprise that fantasy characters are given fantasy proportions?

    If I want to play an overweight computer programmer, I'm not going to buy a game to do it.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  71. another typical feminist whiner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Doesn't like how things are, so she wants to force everybody to change to what she wants.

    My message to her is:
    Hey, instead of endlessly playing the bogus victim card, why don't you go and get funding and start your own company? If you think you got it all figured out, I'm sure you'll be successful.

    Of course she's too lazy and talentless for that. So instead she resorts to whining endlessly.

    P.S. The word is "sex," not "gender." Gender is what describes inanimate objects in the German language, irrespective of what feminists would have you belive.

    1. Re:another typical feminist whiner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word up brothah!

      But you also forgot she has better things to do, like eat and whine and eat some more. See the fact of the matter is as posted before being fit and healthy is natural and thus attractive. Since the fat are lazy, all they can do is whine and eat alot of junk food then try to make us all beleive fat is beautiful and fat is OK. Well fat and ugly is GROSS! This whale needs to shaddup, eat healthy, get healthy and invest her engery into staying healthy. Not whine cuz she is fat and ugly and too lazy to fix that and naturally then get attention.

      I don't like looking at bouncing blubbery fat ugly chicks in person and certainly don't want to in video games. Most men seem to agree as this sort of model moves games and is popular.

  72. Re:Clans by GweiLeong · · Score: 1
    I'm only 26... You're correct that clans are groups of gamers working together (teams, if you will).

    Fragdolls are a group of beautiful women put together by Ubisoft (expenses paid of course) to go to gaming events and promote their games. Slashdot story on them.

  73. Let men be men by endus · · Score: 1
    as I pondered the Playboy bunnies, the return of Leisure Suit Larry, and the slew of buxom virtual ladies headlining each booth

    Give me a break. Men can't even be men in the fantasy world anymore. The feminization of our culture is now supposed to extend to male sexuality now? Fuck that.

    Listen, I'm not saying that there aren't problems with gender representation in video games (no one mentioned the male stereotypes which are propogated by the gaming industry, but I don't really care enough to go down that road). Certainly there is a need for more female characters and especially female characters that aren't over sexualized. However, there is nothing wrong with the return of leisure suit larry or the plaboy game. Here's a newsflash ladies: men think about fucking you. A lot. And dating doesn't come into the fantasy. You know that guy at Starbucks that serves you coffee every morning? He would probably fuck you on the floor behind the counter if he got the chance...and if he wouldn't (which is certainly possible) then I guarantee you he's at least thought about it. It's biological programming...it's how we're wired.

    Now we can either act on that or not. Some people might put forth the idea that getting to act on these impulses in video games might help us to not need to act them out as much in real life. What a concept. Denying the nature of male sexuality isn't going to make it go away. We sure have a lot of talk about how this or that repressed group feels, but what about the traditionally dominant group? Just because we need to work towards a climate of accepting all people's ways of being doesn't mean we should do it at the expense of the previously dominant groups way of being. They, in this case men, have a right to be as they are too.
  74. Objectification? It's a video game character! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how people toss around the word "objectification" whenever a woman is dressed to be sexually pleasing.

    But let's get something straight: Video game characters ARE objects!

  75. Re:femenist... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny


    You know, they say masturbation doesn't really make you go blind, but the lack of decent spelling, punctuation, and perspective in your comment has to make me wonder.

    Lay off the wacking for a few hours, junior.

  76. Can we evolve to the point where... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    ... we accept the facts that men like looking at hotties and women like babbling incessantly about nonsense.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  77. aha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet, she's not adverse to posting "sexy, come-hither" photos of herself...

    personal page
    1 Up page

    I sure would love to Flower her Zoe...

  78. Thank god, no more Ashton Kucher! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the good holy fuck? Women gamers have a problem with the Lara Croft character? Why?

    I guess that means no more good looking guys in games. No more superheroes with gargantuan muscles, no more cute guys in movies; every actor should be a hideous nerd.

    You want to identify with your demographic, right? Naturally I've gone well beyond the bounds of the original chick logic: remember, it only applies to us guys. Women refuse to feed from the same trough of humility that they insist men do.

  79. I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have to deal with over opinionated, pms'ed women. Why on any planet would I want to spend my spare time playing a game with a bitchy character like this? *unless of course this was the evil arch enemy*

    Same can be said about males. I don't see a lot pot bellied, beer drinking, couch potatoes as heros either.

    I think in general physical attraction is more important to men, where women are more complex. Well atleast that's my understand, who the hell can understand women anyway? Definately not the game designers, hell sometimes I think women don't even understand themselves.

    One thing is for certain they know what males like.

  80. sick of the PC crap by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

    this shouldn't be a shock but we are animals. i'm sick of people that are surprised by this, i mean, should we all shave our heads and look as androgynous as we can so that we get rid of our differences?

    i'm wondering where this whole idea that if we become as androgynous as possible is being civilized or advanced? sexuality is a part of humanity, like it or not.

    --

    "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
  81. Getting the Girl... by infinite9 · · Score: 1

    Girls? I don't get it.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  82. Re:Clans by swv3752 · · Score: 1

    http://www.fragdolls.com/

    Real hard to find when it is the I'm feeling lucky search. FragDolls are a bit overhyped in the gamer community. Take a group of quite attractive twenty-somethings taht play online games, and have a gamer geeks fantasy. Of course one look and thier website and thier email address "Fragdolls at ubisoft dot com" and it comes across as highly commercialized.

    A clan is a group of online friends who game together. Some of the more notable clans play together in game tournaments. If you have ever seen someone's name with "{FD}" after the name, it is an indication that they are in a clan.

    Many clans are based around FPS like CS, though MMORPG's have them too.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  83. So you're trying to say... by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    justin timberlake is buff? Oh wait hes such a loser after the superbowl :-)

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:So you're trying to say... by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      He wouldn't be my choice but yeah he was voted 'year's sexiest man' (see here). In the company of Johnny Depp, Jude Law, and, ye gods, Ben Affleck.

  84. Re:femenist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah. This must be what is called "enlighted discourse."

  85. Slurs by LPetrazickis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes, stratjakt, you are being taken to a concentration camp is an airless cattle car. If you suffocate or starve to death en route, so much the better.

    If you are sickly when you get there, you will be carted off to the mass showers to be gassed immediately. Otherwise, you will be put to work digging mass graves and dragging bodies to the incinirators.

    Insulting your opponents is not a legitimate debate tactic. Likening them to the Third Reich makes you look even more foolish.

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  86. Come on... by Rirath.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will Nina's low-cut shorts and thigh-high boots allow her to deliver a more powerful blow in Death by Degrees? The developer wants you to believe so.

    Hmm, I haven't played "Death by Degrees", but I somehow doubt there's a blurb in it that amounts to sexy outfit = power fighter. What the heck is wrong with sexy outfit = sexy outfit?

    Beyond Good & Evil's Jade bucked the trend of buxom and deadly heroines; the game was critically acclaimed, but sales proved disappointing

    Riiight... Beyond Good and Evil's low sales was due soely the to fact that the lead girl wasn't hot enough. Why, I sure know that's why I didn't play it! How about the fact that it was a niche adventure game with decidedly average scores across all the genres? Nah, couldn't be that.

    This ain't news, this is just someone on a rant. And for crying out loud, will the "grrlgamers" out there STOP using Lara Croft as an example? Nobody has cared less what Lara Croft does for ages now. Nobody cares less what Bloodrayne does either, it's a sub-par slasher barely worth bargin bin prices.

    Maybe I should have been offended when playing through Prince of Persia, that game was obviously sexist! Why didn't the female lead lose clothes throughout the adventure as well?

    1. Re:Come on... by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

      More on Death By Degrees... as TFA states:

      "functional beauty in combat." It turns out that Nina's bikini and catsuit are more than just eye candy. "The outfit designs were based on ease of movement and variation in appearance," states Sakagami. "Depending on whether an attack connects with bare or clothed skin, the resulting damage differs."

      So it's the classic "spellcasters need to wear light clothing" argument, basically. Still hardly amounts, to me, to what the blurb was implying. Why does anyone pay attention to these silly blurbs anyway? Do guys care about the suit's backstory in some generic fighter? Hardly. Leave it to a woman to nitpick such details. ;)

      And ya know, one thing rarely touched on is the fact that it's not at all surprising nearly everyone in say, Soul Calibur 2, looks great. Gee, you think maybe if you spend your life doing extreme training across the globe and becoming a master fighter you'll get a good figure doing it? I've never seen fat ninja.

  87. Problem is.. by Xlipse · · Score: 1

    for a lot of people, /.'s in particular..

    that's a lot easier said then done. ;)

    You are about 99% correct though. The only time 'nice guys' get girls is when the DO 'settle', except in extreme cases, or get lucky (seriously... lucky)

  88. Re:femenist... by LabRat404 · · Score: 0

    Firstly, take me for my opinion and only my opinion. Secondly, HTML formatting is selected by default so my spacing and indentations were completely lost because I forgot to select text formatting. My perspective is that of a pissed off 19 year old. I'm just sick of people like you complaining about petty things like punc-tu-a-tion. wooedpy shit. loook at mee i m not spell i nngg rihghhttt. I hate you. go kill yourself.

    --
    1001100 1100101 1100001 1110110 1100101 1001101 1111001 1000010 1101001 1110100 1110011 1000001 1101100 1101111 110111
  89. Am I the only one ... by MBraynard · · Score: 1

    Who skimmed the article to try and see what Zoe Flower looked like and was disappointed not to see a picture?

  90. Re:femenist... by LabRat404 · · Score: 0

    I must say, slashdot is a great source of news. The only problem I see with it is the fact that people don't want to hear anything logical or rational, and when they do they bash whoever posted it like yo ujust did. Sure, I may have been irrational in my previous post, and may very well get banned for it. If you want a pointer in life, here is one: Don't talk down to people!

    --
    1001100 1100101 1100001 1110110 1100101 1001101 1111001 1000010 1101001 1110100 1110011 1000001 1101100 1101111 110111
  91. Woman have to be attractive... by disntrstd · · Score: 0

    Otherwise, how would they fill their biological function of finding a man and raising children?

  92. It's not me, it's you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just tell you that to spare your feelings.

  93. dammit by rgf71 · · Score: 1

    Screw you guys! I thought this was going to be a man page or a howto: :(

  94. Mod Parent Up: +1 Reasonable by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    No text.:)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  95. what about this?: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:what about this?: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must admit I wouldnt think that a troll.

      With this one after looking at the article, cause you said she was 16 and she had an asian name and I was wondering if she looked hot, I caught myself as I was starting to seriously reply. Only then did I notice your nick ... Im slow today.

  96. oh the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or is anyone else tired this sort of lament.

    If this author has been around for so long then why hasn't she figured out what the above posters seem to already know?

    Zoe, I hope one day you will "evolve" and stop complaining about things who's solutions are patently obvious!

  97. Ever met a bombshell that didn't like attention? by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Women, when they are honest with themselves desire the ultimate male like men desire the ultimate female. This is all subjective to one's own tastes.

    People are so afraid to be alone they will ridicule their partner if they admire physical or artistic beauty that reveals an insecurity the ridiculer holds deep inside. More often than not their partner is unaware, but more importantly, even if they are aware and you still whine that you don't "control" the sole attention of your partner you have serious issues.

    People are on borrowed time with one another. Grow up. You don't like it than go find a wimp for a lover who kisses your ass. If you want to learn and experience life than find someone who really doesn't worship the ground you walk on and demands the same from you. That way you both can learn to appreciate that relationships aren't about controlling one's perceptions of beauty but being able to handle the fact you aren't David to someone else nor Michelangelo to someone else's David.

    Beauty brings silence and an awe inspiring touch of peace. It brings lust. It brings respect and it reminds us how undisciplined most of us are when it comes to impulses. Don't spit on beauty. Don't be a control freak who can't accept the mold wasn't broken after they were born.

    Don't be afraid to be solo. Enjoy finding who you are and then you just might enjoy beauty in everything.

  98. only one kind of boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all geeks know computers are boxen in plural, as for the other kind of boxes I guess no geek will ever know them in plural.

  99. I'm stunned by Reignking · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm stunned. Stunned that there were enough women at E3 to form a line for the women's room...

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  100. HL2 worth mentioning, but you're being extreme by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    There's no way half life can be legitimally called GOTY 2004. Remember, ut2004, and WoW were both released in 2004.

    If you're going to include a "evil empire" release like HL2, you might as well throw Halo 2 in as well.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:HL2 worth mentioning, but you're being extreme by neolith · · Score: 1

      GOTY is a subjective opinion. There isn't an official gaming body like the AP that hands down from on high and official nomination. HL2 is my personal GOTY, and has got the nod from other places as well. I think it stands above the comp with its physics engine, SDK, and improvements in character modeling, and will be as actively supported as the original Half-life. If valve is an EE, then the world could use more of their brand of evil. At any rate, it doesn't really detract from my main point.

      --
      Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com
  101. Metroid series - Samus by jangobongo · · Score: 1


    I think Samus of the Metroid series of games is a good example of a strong female character in a game. You can tell she is female without having to exploit her breasts or bare skin. She kicks butt all the while she's going against the gaming stereotype.

    Kudos to that game's designers.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    1. Re:Metroid series - Samus by neolith · · Score: 1

      The problem with Samus is that yes, she is an awesome female character, and yes, she would no doubt be a good rolemodel for young girls, but... the only way we know she is a girl is the fact that she takes off her suit in ever more revealing fashion depending on how well you complete the game. Thus, she is part of an enterprise that is just a step above the various video strip poker games.

      IMO, nintendo should have ditched that concept after the first Metroid back on the NES. Taking off the helmet to reveal Samus is a girl is cool and progressive, "HOLY CRAP now she's got a bikini! Smoking!" is not.

      --
      Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com
    2. Re:Metroid series - Samus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. She looks like a malformed Barbie doll. Way to ruin everything, Japan!

      JUSTIN BAILEY
      ------ ------

  102. Now - what a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on girls - men are no longer allowed to be what men are when they are worst (or best depending the view): Inappropriate

    So it comes as no surprise to me that women must engage still stronger measures in order to motivate men to overcome their fear of retalliation and initiate contact anyway.

    You dug that hole yourself.

  103. you are sexist by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that a 15 year old girl might break into the male only PGA for the first time is newsworthy and exciting in and of itself, regardless of all other factors

    to get your panties in a twist about the prospect (snicker) like you seem to be doing means you are threatened by the idea, which means you have a problem with women, which means you're sexist

    no, really

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  104. My Getaway by sf2turbomaster · · Score: 1

    I don't know why the majority of gamers play games but i do it cause just for a moment i would like to escape reality. A reality where i might not have a sixpack and have to look at butt ugly people everyday on the street and at work. Hell yeah give me that fantasy where i can be taller and stronger and just be surrounded by babes.

  105. Evolved? by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Men/boys (your main game demographics historically) like to look at attractive women. There is nothing wrong with this, it is a natural response.

    Men do not have to stop acting like men just because a few women (I say "few" because I most women I know are OK with guys looking at girls, as long as it's not overt and rude) take offense. I say, let 'em make games w/beefy guys as the characters, if the female market will bear it.

    Suppressing biological drives is tough... attempting to suppress the most important drive is a futile exercise.

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Evolved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men do not have to stop acting like men just because a few women (I say "few" because I most women I know are OK with guys looking at girls, as long as it's not overt and rude) take offense.

      And I'm sure you know a lot, chodo boy.

    2. Re:Evolved? by Xel'Naga · · Score: 1
      Suppressing biological drives is tough... attempting to suppress the most important drive is a futile exercise.

      Yep, just like having a religion which doesn't allow promiscuity. It just can't be done.

    3. Re:Evolved? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest that the primary drive is to mate, not necessarily with many different people.

      Although... most animals (not all) do tend to have lots of 'partners' in life. Maybe the emotional response that is most advanced in humans overrides (for some folks) the need to 'spread the seed' everywhere, if they have a satisfactory mate?

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:Evolved? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tomb Raider was originally supposed to feature an Indiana Jones type male lead. The main programmer, however, decided that if he was going to spend a year staring at an ass, it might as well be an attractive female ass.

      Hence, Lara Croft.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  106. no, you're not slow today by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you're just slow

    BWAHAHAHA

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  107. No Fork Bomb Required by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    You now have slashdot, eggs and bacon should be no problem.

    From the article:

    Inspired by a thinkgeek april fool's day joke, the iGrill is a 600Mhz Mini-ITX motherboard, an 80GB hard drive, and a 250W PSU, running Gentoo Linux, all enclosed in a George Foreman grill. Technically it's lost the grilling-functionality, but with a bit of tin foil on top of the heatsink and a fork-bomb, I reckon I could probably still fry an egg with it.

    And yes, this webserver is hosted on the grill.

  108. Blame your sub-conscious for the censorship by tezza · · Score: 1
    as I pondered the Playboy bunnies, the return of Leisure Suit Larry, and the slew of buxom virtual ladies headlining each booth

    Your subconscious mind filters images before your conscious mind gets a chance. So in a crowd, you tend to notice the stunning girls, and look straight past the mingers. So whilst there may only be slightly more good looking girls in a crowd, say, you'll notice the increase. Later, to a friend you'll say, 'everywhere I looked, there were Babes!'. What you often mean is: 'Everywhere I looked there was some woman my sub-conscious did not pre-erradictate [sic].'

    You notice v. ugly women [here used as partner, subsititute Man if you are a woman, or stay if you are a lesbian etc.] because you desire to avoid them especially, and the subconscious highlights them to ensure you conciously do so.

    Also people sub-consiously find evidence that backs up assumptions they already had. Does it sound like this poster had an axe somewhere needing to be ground??

    So even to her sub-consious, where breasts are still attractive to females [kown], as well as being a natural competitive eye-drawer for women, is it surprising all she sees is large breasted images??

    Her subconsious is working overtime to highlight them.

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  109. Re:Objectification? It's a video game character! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't that depend on what how the programmers coded the game, not all programs are OOP.

  110. empowerment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "empowerment" is the word at which I stopped reading the article.

    Words such as "empowerment" are FUD and should be avoided.

  111. It's the stats, silly... by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Do you see any short bald dudes with a big pot
    > belly on any of these boxes either? No, it's all
    > he-man looking dudes busting at the seams with muscles

    Be serious. Why would I want to play a "short bald dude" character? It would be a really boring game since he'd probably have a str of 3 or 4 and a measly 15 hp, giving me hours upon hours of "level grind" until I can get his sorry lazy ass sufficiently trained to take on anything bigger than a rat.

  112. Heres a novel idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A game is a product. A product is designed for its market. The success of a product is measured in sales and proffit. There is no other consideration.

  113. Not Tall! by R.Pad · · Score: 1

    She's 5'5.5"!!! Her columns live here.

    1. Re:Not Tall! by mink · · Score: 1

      If AC is 4' something sh would seem tall. Or maybe he was always chasing some cable across the floow whenever she was in the office.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  114. People need to stop crying and get in shape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I find it humorous how limp wristed some people are. They want to act without regard to consequence.

    I hate to break it to you like this but I'm going to anyway:

    People are not meant to be fat and out of shape. If you let yourself get that way from years of inactivity and eating junk food, then expect people to look down on you for being that way. Cry as much as you want about fixation on looks but the truth remains that being in shape is a *good thing*.

    Cause...effect.... Eat crap, don't take care of yourself- expect to be fat, ugly, and frowned upon. Eat quality food, take care of yourself- expect people to notice your good health and physique.

    The most vocal people who are offended and complain about good looking girls in magazines are those who want to eat shit and STILL feel good about it. The world doesn't work that way.

  115. best way to turn a non-gamer (female) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    two words..

    Dr Mario.

    even women who arent generally interested in gaming at all.. can easily become addicted to dr mario. And thats just the entry drug..
    so go out and find all the old super nintendo machines you can and stock up on the old classic dr mario.

  116. Ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ughhhh... you just offended me on several different levels!

  117. may i offer an hypothesis? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    That people are as they are?

    AFAIK throughout history, while the 'favored archetype' has morphed from Rubenesque to Twiggy to whatever, men have always been interested in women as sexual objects.

    Perhaps the person assuming that we will 'evolve' not to feel this way or to organize our entertainment for these purposes is the one fooling themselves?

    I've always wondered why it's the 'feminine' view of the world (negotiation, communication, empathy, non violence, nurturing, etc.) that we're supposedly aspiring to, leaving our bestial 'male' roots (violence, power, sex, etc.) behind? I mean, as any evolutionist will tell you, it's not a linear thing, and it's most certainly not a moral ascendance; it's whatever happens to offer a reproductive/survival advantage in a generation, gets favorably passed on.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:may i offer an hypothesis? by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      If that's what you think the feminine view is, you must not have had a teenage sister. Women have a kind of nastiness that make fistfights seem like reasoned debate in comparison.

      The thing is, womanly qualities have as many positives and negatives as their manly counterparts. Our current culture can really favor women, in word at least. Trying to make up for the centuries of male-domination, I guess. Eventually we might balance out and quit the gender war, but I kind of doubt it.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
  118. Latest Game Releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The l33t grafx crackerz @ Realizt Gamez are proud to announce our latest titles:

    o Fat Bitch 2: Drip from the Red String
    o Zany Adventures of Psoriasis and Nutskratch
    o Mindlezz TV TriVia XIV (MSNtv2 Edition)
    and
    o Plastic Surgery Tycoon

    Available next month! Check for our Ad in your local Pennysaver.

  119. GI joe didn't have a . . . by tallbill · · Score: 1

    Well, you know what he didn't have.

  120. Straight guys love playing the large breasted woma by tallbill · · Score: 1

    I noitced years ago that straight guys love to play the large breasted women characters.

    When my friends would play Mortal Combat they would always choose the women.

  121. This is an outrage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will women finally understand that these "vitual girls" represent the ideal woman? Sheesh.

  122. What you fail to understand, being inside all day by ShawnMcCool42 · · Score: 1

    Is that women really ARE like in games. They have HUGE breasts, slender waists. And they really derive a certain level of satisfaction making their men happy.

    So before you go and judge. Stop and think for just a moment about how you're turning 'being a woman' into an idea of a negative stereotype.

  123. I'll take Judith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Mossman was hotter than Alyx (prepares to get flamed), and just as realistic (i.e., not cartoony or impossibly big boobed).

  124. Re:What you fail to understand, being inside all d by AnimeRelm · · Score: 1

    This is without a doubt one of the most truthful things I've heard although they do make breasts of female game characters larger than thier real life counter parts.
    People who fool themselves about this subject need to get out a bit more and well... look at women. I don't mean to imply all women are curvacious, but it seems like many are well-endowed.

  125. WARNING: Rant by null+etc. · · Score: 1
    I'd like to warn you in advance that I'm going to rant now. This post is intended to reflect my opinion solely; but hopefully there are a few like-minded compatriots out there.

    There seem to be a few recurring themes within this topic's threads:

    Is it natural for humans to want to look at humans of the opposite sex?

    Obviously, it is.

    Is it moral to use natural instinct as an excuse to not seek better behavior?

    I've always had a real problem with the attitude that "this is what humans do, so why should we strive to do different." Think about how humans operate in impoverished, third-world countries. Little thought or planning goes into the lifestyles of millions of people, simply because the inhabitants don't have a stable enough life or enconomy to afford long-term thinking. Many couples have seven or more children, most of whom die. AIDS is rampant.

    That's what humans do, if you want to get technical. We should always strive for better.

    Is it moral to use sex appeal to sell games and other items?

    It's certainly moral to use sex appeal to sell sexy products. But using sex appeal to sell non-sex-related items? That's just exploitation, manipulation, or what have you. Great example: Sudeki. Supposedly great RPG. The ad shows this hottie little elf in a bikini, holding a staff. The tagline for the ad is "Pray for a frontal assault".

    Now, the prude that I am, I have problems with this on so many levels.

    1. Am I supposed to imagine myself playing this game, saying to myself "Oh, I'm about to enter a battle! I hope I get to fight a hot elf chick in a bikini! Please, PLEASE let it be a frontal assault! I want to see her full frontal assault! I want her to frontally assault me and slide up and down me in that gorgeous bikini with the busty cleavage that I JUST CAN'T IGNORE, sliding up and down my body and..." Oh wait, AM I SUPPOSED TO BE PLAYING A GAME HERE, or having a fantasy?
    2. Which leads to my follow-up point... Why advertise like that for a game whose selling point is NOT titillation? If I was a developer for that company, I would be PISSED! Imaginary conversation between game developers:

      Fred: See Tom, I told you they would put a hot chick in armor bikini on the advert, and stress her rather than point out all the great features we programmed into the game.

      Tom: WTF?!?!?! After all the 90 hour work weeks I put into party combat AI? Why would you EVER pray for a frontal assault? Couldn't they have talked about the dynamic quest system we implemented for RPG stat gaps in between quests???

      Fred: See Tom, I told you they would put a hot chick in armor bikini on the advert.

    Imaginary conversation between game developer and game player:

    Sam: Hey dude, I heard you were a developer on one of those popular RPG games. What was the name of it?

    Tom: Sudeki.

    Sam: Is that the one that was based on that seven hour movie?

    Tom: No, that was Lord of the Rings.

    Sam: Oh. What is cool about Sudeki?

    Tom: Sudeki has an interactive dynamic quest system to help you level up between important quests.

    Sam: Cool! But it's funny, I don't remember seeing any ads or reviews about anything like that.

    Tom: Our advertisement said, "Pray for a frontal assault."

    Sam: Oh, that one! With the hot elf chick in the metal bikini! Hey, does she really strip down and show her cleavage when she does a frontal assault! I love those games!

    How embarrasing for game developers.

    How many games could possibly be described by the tagline "Pray for a frontal assault!", if there was a hot chick on the ad? Nearly all of them, I'd presume. This is just generic crap.

    This is proof that the entertainment c

  126. Fat ugly chicks whining and spitting out food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just shaddup and become what we obviously WANT to see and LIKE to see.

    Fatties.

  127. Disappointing responses here by Rhone · · Score: 1

    It's amazing how misunderstood the article is here. (Okay, I guess it isn't amazing since it's so typical, but I'm trying to close my eyes and pretend I'm in a world where people are reasonable.)

    For those who didn't read the article, or who read it with preconceived notions about its purpose and thus didn't understand it very well, here are some important points:

    Zoe is not taking a Feminist, Morale Outrage, censorship-promoting position. For the most part, her disposition is one of curiosity and neutrality. She at no point insults the games that use sexy female characters, and the point of her article isn't to try to convince people that there's a huge problem that needs to be changed. Instead, the article is basically her musing the questions of why it is the norm in the gaming industry, what the appeal is for both male and female gamers, and what (if anything) can be done to get more females into games.

    Zoe also at no point suggests that men are solely (or even mostly) at fault. Hell, she spends several paragraphs on discussing a couple female lead designers who quite happily created female sex objects in games, and she mentions that those sexy female characters were generally well-received by female playtesters. In one case she mentions that some female playtesters liked the character, but complained that she was perhaps showing a little too much skin. The game designers explained that seduction is one of the things the character uses to her advantage in the game, and the female playtesters "bought into [the character] completely and were really excited about playing her".)

    Zoe also at no point tries to suggest that game characters should be ugly and/or fat. She uses the female protagonist from Beyond Good and Evil--who is thin, but doesn't have big bouncy boobies or run around in lingerie--as a character that she doesn't think is being used as a sex object.

    Now that those silly misconceptions are cleared up (yeah, right..), let me interject my own thoughts:

    I am a man, and I am more bothered by the objectification of women in games than Zoe seems to be. Please note that I don't advocate censorship at all, and I don't think there is anything _ethically_ wrong with either creating or playing a game that uses women or men as sex objects. People like sex, which is why it sells.

    I just wish that it wasn't so pervasive. I feel like my intelligence is being insulted when game designers are asking me to accept that their superbly athletic, heroic female main character is running around with floppy lard-filled breasts, and chooses flimsy lingerie as her outfit of choice when going into dangerous battles. There are games I've chosen not to buy/play because I felt like they were insulting my intelligence in this way (Tomb Raider and BloodRayne come to mind, not to mention the completely ridiculous DoA).

    And that's unfortunate, because for so long we have gone with a scarcity of female main characters in games. And now that we have them, they are sex symbols more often than positive, empowering role models. I'm not saying I want characters in games to look fat or ugly; there's nothing wrong with making the characters attractive. But dressing female characters up in revealing lingerie, with unrealistically huge breasts hanging out, takes the focus of the heroine away from her strength, competence, accomplishments, etc., and puts the focus on her role as eye candy.

    And, while I don't like male bashing feminists anymore than anyone else does, I still don't like the fact that our culture trains women to base their self-esteem on their appearance. And, FWIW, I think women are as much (if not more) at fault for this as men are. I see/hear women criticizing other women for their fashion sense, appearance, etc. more than I see/hear men doing the same. And women's magazines like Cosmopolitan are put together by women, reach a larger audience than any of these games do (hell, probably a larger audience than all of the games put together), and not only portray women as sex objects (without the accompanying heroic qualities you see in games), but also are filled with articles on how you, too, can reduce yourself to a mindless sex object.

  128. You should be talking ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This aint K5, you need to be much faster to be effective here. 1 or 2 bites is nothing to be proud of :)

  129. How can we get women to buy G.I. Joe? by Pentomino · · Score: 1

    I think it's a good idea to draw a parallel between video games, children's toys, and other hobbies.

    I put forth that any video game, toy, or hobby that involves guns is going to appeal to more men than women, as a rule. You might see a woman who's formidable at Halo 2, or a female hunter with a big deer trophy in her living room, or a little girl who wants a G.I. Joe for her birthday, but I imagine you'll have to look a little harder to find her.

    Consider that the games most popular with females don't center around the use of guns or other overt violence: Tetris, Sims, Pac-Man, Dance Dance Revolution, etc. There's nothing overtly feminine about any of these games, but there's also nothing overwhelmingly masculine about them either.

    And then consider that most games these days are shooters of some kind. First-person shooters, space shooters, World War II and Vietnam epics, side-scrollers, and all that. Make room in that pie chart for the interminable flood of sports franchises that are the bane of neglected girlfriends everywhere. And save a slice for those games influenced by the Girls Gone Wild fad. Whatever's left is that which MIGHT appeal to women, if they're even any good. Is it any surprise that the video game industry is perceived as having a giant "NO GURLS ALLOWED" sign on it with the S backwards?

    Making a video game that appeals to women is like making a board game that appeals to women. Not knowing my board game history, can anybody tell me if Milton-Bradley ever had to tackle that problem?

    1. Re:How can we get women to buy G.I. Joe? by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      Spot on. Several of my friends work in the games biz and we had various conversations along these lines over the holidays.

      They'd ponder the adolescent-male demographic a bit and talk about how crossover/breakout games could grow entire new markets (and make metric buttloads of cash) and then they'd mull on what the magic ingredient for a gender crossover might be.

      Then various wives/partners etc would chip in to point out that 99.999% of the stuff currently being shifted by the computer games industry is aimed laser-like at the psychological sweet spot of basement-dwelling teen males and that the stuff that *they* tended to like was pretty simple and straightforward - namechecking many of the games you mention - and foregrounding stuff like having fun in a group, not requiring hours of obsessive play to complete and not involving the whole 'scatter your enemies and hear the lamentations of their women' aesthetic that is at the core of practically all computer games.

      The games biz guys would get a bit defensive and respond that not all games were like that, but when put to the test they were hard pressed to come up with games that didn't involve either direct violence (first person shooters, arcade beat 'em ups et alia) or 'grind your opponents into the dust' (4x strategy, sports games, racing games etc) at which point they'd concede the point and someone would suggest a round or two of Singstar in the living room...

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
  130. Re:femenist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Look at me, I'm having trouble communicating my ideas in an effective way, but I'm not willing to put in the time to correct the problem, and instead attack those who try to point it out to me!"

  131. Re:Disappointing response here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think role models should be found in a video game, do us all a favor and permanently sterlize yourself so you cannot fail horribly as a parent. If you can't deal with the fact that sex is a part of humanity and that has been quite obvious for millenia, buy yourself a pokemon deck and shaddup.

    Fool.

  132. Re:I'm stunned too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was not a line for their trough as well.

  133. Re:Objectification? It's a video game character! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any engine and in turn game you try to build without OOP will be as smelly a turd as this article and the fat crybaby who wrote it.

  134. I disagree. by i41Overlord · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is an example of political correctness stifling scientific understanding. Over the years people have been taught to despise and shoot down any stereotype, even if that stereotype has a basis in truth. Remember, not ALL stereotypes are bad or offensive.

    What the original poster said is true. The brains of men and women are specialized for different functions. It has been proven numerous times that men are more optimized at visual spatial skills while women have inherent advantages in verbal and organizational skills.

    http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?l an guage=english&type=24119&article_id=218391881&cat= 1_1

    And as far as black people having more fast twitch musle fibers, that's not entirely accurate but there is some truth behind the story. It's not all black people, but specifically people who evolved in the Western Africa region do have a higher percentage of quick twitch muscle fibers and a higher testosterone level than those elsewhere in the world. They have a distinct advantage in anaerobic performance such as sprinting, and the records over the years spell it out clearly. Don't confuse this with "all" black people, because those who evolved in Eastern Africa, notably the high altitude region between Kenya and Ethiopia have almost the complete opposite evolutionary specialization. Not surprisingly, from evolving in a high altitude region, they have a larger lung capacity and better cardiovascular system (more red blood cells) than those who evolved at lower altitudes. They excel at aerobic activities such as long distance running.

    http://www.africana.com/articles/daily/index_200 11 106.asp

    In the examples I gave above, look at the records. You have a huge pool of competitors from all over the globe yet people from a small area seem to win a *huge* proportion of events that *far* exceeds the percentage that a random group of people should win. I mean just take a look at the Boston Marathon. Kenya is not exactly the most populous country on Earth, but look at the results from the last 20 years when they started competing:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_winners_of_ th e_Boston_Marathon

    This is not a racist or sexist discussion, this is a discussion of the realities of evolution and the differences that we live with. It's not a reason to hate, it's a reason to understand.

    I am not racist or sexist, I'm just not an ultra left-wing PC Nazi or an ultra right-wing Bible thumper. I'm just a regular guy who would like to throw the racism and sexism out the window and find out the *real* underlying causes, even if they are taboo to talk about. I'm firm believer in evolution and I believe that many of the differences you see in races/the sexes is due to evolving in different areas or doing different tasks.

  135. I wonder if this'll still be read? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

    What always makes me grin is the fact that women have been railing against the age old stereotype of 'boys play with cars, girls with dolls'.

    But what do we find? The biggest dollhouse in the world is found on the pc, is called 'The Sims' and is just about the only game which has a uniformly large percentage of women playing it. And men like to explore and blow stuff up.

    And then hear the women rail against the fashion/clothing/pink-barbie-doll games which are targetted towards women; with an example like 'The Sims', how can you blame the poor marketeers?

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  136. Target Product by symbolset · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a real life. I don't spend $3,000 on hardware and hundreds on games to interact with average people in normal costume. That I get for free. I spend that much on games because I _want_ to escape real life for a while and enjoy a fantasy world where I have the biggest gun and all the women are clones of Jeri Ryan.

    That's my target product. Myst you can keep for yourself. Thanks.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Target Product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have a real life. I don't spend $3,000 on hardware and hundreds on games to interact with average people in normal costume. "

      Never flown cross country to go to a convention full of cosplayers?

  137. You know you are buying too many video games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when your purchases alone determine the average age of the game buyer in the US.

  138. SimSnobs on GrrlGamer by Animats · · Score: 1

    The new frontier in gaming - commercial interior decorating for the Sims. The Turquoise Seashell Living Room Set. "Aren't the window treatments just to die for?"

  139. Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Insightful?? More like Inciteful!

  140. Importent Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her name is Ceren Ercen. Oh, and she is a registered /. user. She is nice though.

  141. The funny thing is... by Sindri · · Score: 1

    Try counting the number of magazines in a magazine rack that don't have a picture of a woman on the cover, very few. The magazines marketed toward women also have women on the cover. The fact is big breasted women help sell to every demographic, girls like to see other girls to compare themselves with.

  142. Re:Your example... by symbolic · · Score: 1

    ...is not reasonable. There is one reason, and one reason only, that marketers use the stereotypes they do...it sells.

    Personally, I find the whole breast-obessive fixation by both men and women in our culture, quite hysterical.

  143. Re:Your example... by be-fan · · Score: 1

    How is my example unreasonable? You have to consider *why* stereotypes sell. They sell, because they are easy, they are simple to comprehend. They take less time to process, and when all you've got is a 30-second spot, the faster your audience understands your point, the better.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  144. Re:Zoe Flower? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    That's alright, my friend's boss at Burger King was named Cindy Meadows.

  145. Re:Your example... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    On one hand I agree that stereotypes relieve the average person from having to exert any effort thinking about who or what they are actually dealing with. On the other hand, when it comes to selling, my opinion is that products don't sell because they are accompanied by stereotypes, but because of the stereotypes being used. I dare say that many male gamers wouldn't find it nearly as titillating if the large-breasted, nearly-naked female characters were replaced with the stereotypical representation of a geek or nerd.

  146. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is posting to the proper sid.

    This is not the george foreman grill story, you stupid nigger.

  147. Dating Simulations by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Nobody wants to play a fat guy or an ugly gal.
    I disagree. Start playing the various anime-based dating games and you'll find that often, you're not playing the most stunning piece of humanity in the game. Admittedly, a minority of them are truly ugly, but they adhere a bit closer to the reality of the kind of person who desires to play a game where choosing the right dialogue choices will result in non-stop sex.

    That said, there's an interesting double-standard there. Jackie's Fridge said it pretty well when one of the characters (female) commented that when you see an ugly guy walking down the street with a beautiful girl on his arm, you think "lucky bloke" whereas when you see a good-looking guy with an ugly girl on his arm, you think "poor sod." (admittedly, I tend to use less British slang, but I'm trying to get close as possible to the original quote without trying to access said site from work)

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.