Slashdot Mirror


Has TiVo's Fate Been Sealed?

ChipGuy writes "Things are getting bleak for TiVo, reports the New York Times, and adds that TiVo blew a major opportunity to team up with Comcast. And that might have cost CEO Michael Ramsey the job. Om Malik writes that 'The fate of TiVo also highlights the dilemma facing a lot of "exploding TV" start-ups. The technology does not necessarily translate into profits and a business,' and breaks down the financials -- over half a billion dollars in losses so far. PVRBlog adds that 'When the story of TiVo is written, this Comcast negotiation could be the point when the company's outcome was decided.' More reactions here."

364 comments

  1. Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is official; Netcraft confirms: Tivo is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Tivo community when IDC confirmed that Tivo market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Tivo has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Tivo is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin [amdest.com] to predict Tivo's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Tivo faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Tivo because Tivo is dying. Things are looking very bad for Tivo. As many of us are already aware, Tivo continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeTivo is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeTivo developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeTivo is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenTivo leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenTivo. How many users of NetTivo are there? Let's see. The number of OpenTivo versus NetTivo posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetTivo users. Tivo/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetTivo posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of Tivo/OS. A recent article put FreeTivo at about 80 percent of the Tivo market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeTivo users. This is consistent with the number of FreeTivo Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeTivo went out of business and was taken over by TivoI who sell another troubled OS. Now TivoI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that Tivo has steadily declined in market share. Tivo is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Tivo is to survive at all it will be among DVR dilettante dabblers. Tivo continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Tivo is dead.

    Fact: Tivo is dying

    1. Re:Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is funny, maybe I don't get the joke, but it seems to me that it would be informative more than anything else...

    2. Re:Netcraft confirms by plover · · Score: 1, Informative
      If this is funny, maybe I don't get the joke, but it seems to me that it would be informative more than anything else...

      You're right, you just don't get the joke yet. ( It's certainly not informative. )

      If you browse at -1, you'll see this is a clever rehash of some troll's constant attempts to claim '*BSD is dying.' ( Not that I recommend browsing at -1, there are some really offensive posts down there. If you're faint of heart, just trust me -- most of them deserve deletion rather than simple mod-1. )

      The real mystery to me is why the trolls bother continuing to post this crap. Have they no jobs, no lives, no girlfriends, nothing to do but lurk on websites that don't want them but have no effective way to rid themselves of them? Personally, I can't imagine a more pathetic existance, but I suppose if you're allergic to humanity you gotta find something to do...

      --
      John
    3. Re:Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      This is totally OT so I'm posting AC (-1 here I come), but I think you're totally off. I always browse at -1. Always have and always will, for a couple of reasons. One, sometimes a very relivant or interesting post is unfairly modded down, and two, some of the trolls are teh funnay.

      Also, saying that trolls should be deleted seems to be against the inherent Slashdot philosophy which says that censorship is wrong. Hence they do not filter language or content, and never delete posts unless there is a legal reason to do so. User moderation and meta-moderation for the most part works without the need for interference from the site admins. Irrelivent and useless posts take care of themselves by making themselves invisible to most users (except the brave ones like me).

      You have the right to say whatever you want on Slashdot, you just don't have the right to expect others to read it.

    4. Re:Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good idea, I'll post AC myself to save the karma, my post above has already collected for me a -1, offtopic.

      Sure, saying trolls should be deleted is certainly a move towards "censorship." So f'ing what? Do you listen to static on your FM radio? Do you watch snow on TV channel 3? It's noise. Engineers spend many, many hours working on filters to reduce noise. Are noise filters "censors"?

      I already waste too much time on Slashdot. Very occasionally I read at -1, Troll, and even less occasionally do I find myself rolling on the floor laughing at some incredible piece of satire I might have otherwise missed. But the vast majority of those postings are racist, homophobic, sexist, crude, vulgar, mindless and anything else people can think to write that might be offensive. Why should I have to put up with the effluvium of humanity flowing through Slashdot? Delete them, ship them off to www.kkk.com, ban their IP addresses, whatever. Why should Slashdot have to maintain a cesspool for these idiots? And why would you waste your time reading it?

      For that matter, is there some reason you think Slashdot should continue to pay for bandwidth and disk space to support GNAA posts and ASCII birds? The benefit to them is only negative. Just delete the crap, and move on.

    5. Re:Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess part of the point of why censorship is bad is that a lot of things come down to a matter of taste. I think that the +5, Circle Jerk that goes on here 99% of the time is more of a cesspool than anything the GNAA writes.

    6. Re:Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're an idiot.

    7. Re:Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Clever rehash"? Don't think so. It looks to be a simple substitution. Didn't try to change the names of the developers to be more relevent. Didn't even include any links...just copied the domain that /. shows.

      I've seen funny "*BSD is dying" posts. That is not one.

  2. Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eh TiVo will probably die, they have the entire TV industry against them. As long as I can easily buy a clone or make my own (with no restrictions) why should I care?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by rel4x · · Score: 1

      It's not quite as good if you make it (using MythTv or others). While I might be mistaken, I'm, almost positive the video encoding quality goes WAY down when done on a PC.

      --

      Before you mod me funny, think, perhaps I was insightfully funny?
    2. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'est la vie?

    3. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Im guessing TiVo was just using a decent TV card. As long as the PC is powerful enough it should be OK. Plus, you can get DVB (digital) cards which can just give you the raw mpeg video AFAIK, which TV companies like to keep at a low bandwidth anyway so it can go straight to disk.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    4. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by rel4x · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Right now, I have a decent TV card on my computer (2.53 ghz P4), and no matter which codec, or progam I use for it, the recording quality is pretty shoddy. I'm afraid this might be the difference between having a processor created explicitly for recording, that devotes most of it's resources to it, and a system not created as such.

      --

      Before you mod me funny, think, perhaps I was insightfully funny?
    5. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by sydsavage · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are mistaken. My MythTV box, built around the Hauppauge PVR-350, has better quality encoding than TiVo. MPEG-2 recording at full SDTV resolution of 720x480, while an unhacked TiVo is limited to around half that.

    6. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      the video encoding quality goes WAY down when done on a PC.

      If you do it badly, sure.

      PCs are well capable of doing a decent or better job encoding.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    7. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're using a TV card with a hardware encoder - than that IS a chip designed just for encoding. The recording is just writing that realtime stream to your hard disk. Your CPU is NOT doing the encoding and really doesn't matter that much so long your machine can handle streaming the data to disk.
      The TIVO itself is a box that bundles off the shelf mpeg encoder and decoder, modem chip and a PowerPC 403GCX CPU. The operating system is based on Linux.
      I don't know why you haven't had good luck encoding. I have been able to encode on the fly without frame drops on a p3 850 with good visual quality.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    8. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by bdcrazy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a pentium III 733 and a hauppage wintv pci card thats over 4 years old, and it records really nice movies. Dscaler and virtual dub are great with it. might be the included software, or that it comes with a onboard mpeg encoder that doesn't work very nicely.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    9. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      decent or better job

      Well, as long as you're being scientific about it.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    10. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "As long as I can easily buy a clone or make my own (with no restrictions)"

      So, what's the EULA from your cable company look like? Are you restricted only to "propery licensed" DVRs on your service?

    11. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by starman97 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But not better than my DirecTiVo..
      And it doesnt have dual DSS tuners either.
      Oh and it didnt cost $99

      ok, $12 a month, ya got me there, why that's 2 whole hours of billings vs how many hours to setup Myth?

      For the shows that I want to keep, there's bittorrent.

      But Myth is a cool hack and all that, maybe someone will start selling a complete system for somewhere around $250 or so..

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    12. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by Pendragn_tk · · Score: 1

      DTiVo isn't $12 a month it's only $5. And that $5 will cover up to 8 DTiVos in one house. Two tuners, excellent quality, great stability and awesome hacks. For my money, DTiVo cannot be beat. I have yet to see a MythTV box come anywhere close to that. tk

    13. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you have something set up badly at a particular stage or just a poor card. Generally TV cards go all the way from having absolutely no encoding hardware and the CPU does it, to full expensive pro mpeg encoders. It takes abit of setting right (which is what TiVo has done), make sure you HD is fast enough to record the resulting stream and that you've chosen a suitable frame rate, resolution and codec - you want a codec that only does just enough compression so that the video will be recordable by your hard drive in real time, DivX'ing on the fly is likely to bring your CPU a headache. And digital cable/sat/arial cards are good too because the TV station does all the encoding for you and you just grab the mpeg-2 stream...

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    14. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are mistaken. My MythTV box, built around the Hauppauge PVR-350, has better quality encoding than TiVo. MPEG-2 recording at full SDTV resolution of 720x480, while an unhacked TiVo is limited to around half that.

      My DirecTiVo directly records the compressed data stream for each program. It doesn't expand it and then recompress it, which would reduce image quality. How does that compare to your MythTV box? As an overall question, would swapping out my DirecTiVo for a MythTV box configured like yours get me better quality recording quality?

    15. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Well..

      ...I had for a time a Dual P3 Myth-TV server that had 5 encoders running on it.

      I had to two diskless nodes that netbooted Myth-TV over my wireless network that would display the content. All told I had about 25 GB of music, 150 GB of content, and the ability to record up to 5 shows at a single time.

      I was pretty happy with it.

    16. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As an overall question, would swapping out my DirecTiVo for a MythTV box configured like yours get me better quality recording quality?

      Of course not, but the downside is you have to use DirecTV to use a DirecTiVo. I wouldn't hit a dog in the ass with a DirecTV receiver and will never pay one dime for their service after the lawsuits they are bringing against people for buying perfectly legal smartcards and readers. Not to mention, their old DirecTV DSL division which bought Telocity took me to collections TWICE for service I never even had with Telocity! Fuck DirecTV.

    17. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      5 DirecTV tuners in one box? So, where did you get those DirecTV tuner cards for your Myth box? I would love to get my hands on just one of those cards. If they existed. Which they don't, and never will, ever.

      --
      !hoD
    18. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      OK, it's impossible to beat the integrated solutions (like DirectTiVo) with a separate box. Of course, this explains why TiVo is in trouble. DirectTV is dropping TiVo (or at least making their own box, and you can guess what that means for the future). TiVo's deal with Comcast fell through. So, pretty soon the only way to get TiVo will be the stand alone unit. If you make the comparison between a stand alone TiVo and a Myth TV box, then things change considerably.

    19. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Images, MPEGs, MP3s, DVD Playing and Rips, VideoPhone, Weather Updates, News Updates, web surfing, MAME, ability to watch from any PC (or XBox) in the house, direct ripping to DVD...

      I'm glad you're impressed by your DirectTV but TV is just one part in a very large puzzle and with bittorrent on the machine I can get complete commercial-less HDTV rips without tying up a tuner in about 3 hours per show. We also have StepMania on that box which is convenient.

      Now let's talk about needing 5 tuners... I can barely find a show every hour of prime time fit to record much less 5. Ya'll are f'n nuts for watching that shlop.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    20. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All that stuff is indeed very cool, and I do envy your setup. Unfortunately, I don't have the time or money to set up something of that magnitude.

      I refuse to pay the local cable company for "Digital" (i.e. looks like sh*t on my 50" DLP) cable. DirecTv is the lesser of two evils. And the DirecTivo is very nicely integrated. No fuss no muss.

      As for multiple tuners, yes 5 is overkill, but 2 is a minimum for me. I enjoy spending time with my wife, but I also really enjoy shows she would rather not watch. With two tuners we can watch something we both enjoy together while recording my show to watch later. This was a bigger issue, of course, before TechTV got raped, beaten, and left for dead by G4. But I digress ...

      Bottom line, a well integrated dual tuner DirecTiVo is the best solution for me in all aspects. Given the details above, there is just no way to beat the one time $99 setup and $5 monthly for the increase in quality of life.

      --
      !hoD
    21. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Of course not, but the downside is you have to use DirecTV to use a DirecTiVo.

      I have been extremely happy with DirecTV. I went to that from Cox Communications cable service and have never regretted it. I've had almost no outages. The picture quality is far better and the cost per desirable channel is much lower. The ability to record two channels simultaneously, or to watch one while recording another, is really valuable to me. While I know that can be done with over-the-air broadcasts using MythTV and a couple of tuner cards, I don't believe that it can be done by MythTV with satellite or digital cable (which requires an intermediary box to do the decoding).

      I wouldn't hit a dog in the ass with a DirecTV receiver and will never pay one dime for their service after the lawsuits they are bringing against people for buying perfectly legal smartcards and readers. Not to mention, their old DirecTV DSL division which bought Telocity took me to collections TWICE for service I never even had with Telocity! Fuck DirecTV.

      Sorry that you have had bad experiences with DirecTV, however, I was interested in discussing the technical performance aspects of MythTV vs. DirecTiVo. There are legitimate complaints that can be waged against any of the providers, whether it's price gouging by monopolistic cable companies, Comcast's destruction of TechTV, scheming to saddle consumers with DRM, or over-zealous company lawyers pressing lawsuits that were unjust. The list goes on and on.

    22. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I didnt have cable at the time. I just had the inputs hitched to a nice decent antennae concealed in the frame of a window. A little tweaking and I got 4 over air stations and an HDTV station.

      TV is but one puzzle piece. A nice media center like I talked about is an awesome piece of equipment. A triplet of 100 GB hard drives and a fast broadband connection and let's just say I never wanted for entertainment, it was stable and flawless, and it was add-free. The costs were under $300 plus odd and ends I had on hand.

    23. Re:Ce La Vie (in bad accent) by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Just be clear here, the SA Tivos have a damn good MPEG encoder chip from Sony. That chip, by itself, costs as much as the tivo -- last time I looked, they were $79 each in lots of 10,000. And therein is one of the problems. Only Microsoft can aford to sell hardware for a loss. (This is why Philips stopped making tivos.)

      In many respects, Tivo, Inc. has a history of over-designing the hardware. They're very good at the software, but should stay away from designing hardware. Look at the S1 vs. S2 DTivo. The S1 could've been a DISH Tivo had there not been dealings with DirectTV to preclude it.

  3. Not until.... by Scrab · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I hear it confirmed by Netcraft will I believe it...

    --
    RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
  4. oh man by yaroze32 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    this sucks. The product was good, service was good but the rest of the business world (mainly M$) did not want them around, and it looks like they will get their way. another good one bites the dust ;(

    1. Re:oh man by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would sure hesitate to buy one of Tivo's lifetime subscriptions right about now...

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    2. Re:oh man by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      I would sure hesitate to buy one of Tivo's lifetime subscriptions right about now.

      That's the problem with lifetime subscriptions... most people assume such a subscription is valid for their lifetime when in fact it's valid for the company's lifetime.

      But yeah, an annual subscription looks like the better deal right now...

      Eric
      See your HTTP headers here
    3. Re:oh man by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The product was good, service was good but the rest of the business world (mainly M$) did


      As rich and powerful as Microsoft is, they just don't have the kind of power you think they do, especially when it comes to markets outside of computer OSes. I can't believe you're sitting here blaming Microsoft for the fact that Tivo is a poorly run company...


      The vast majority of business failures people think were somehow caused by Microsoft were really caused by the ineptitude of the company that went under. When Microsoft goes after a market, a well-run company will push them back (see: Quicken vs Microsoft Money). A poorly run company? Well... Darwin's law kicks in. Is that really Microsoft's fault?

    4. Re:oh man by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they could you know, just have stayed at that core thing and sold their things for a nice profit and then just have closed shop or figured another hardware product that people want when there was no more point in doing their first product.

      but they wanted to get a steady stream of money forever.....

      I don't see that much though how MS specificially is to blame. tivo's first product came in a good spot but it's not as competitive now anymore..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:oh man by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually it's for the lifetime of the particular unit you're using. It's non-transferable to a newer unit, for example. But yeah, I assume the lifetime of Tivo as a company applies as well.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    6. Re:oh man by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nuh uh, it's the boxes lifetime. If the box dies after the warrantee is up, so does the service agreement.

      The warrantee is 90 days.

      I like the interface on my TiVo, the company are a bunch of jackasses who think it's the middle of the .com boom or something.

      Think about it, paying 14 bucks a month for TV listings? That's all the TiVo service provides, other than that, the box is just artificially crippled.

      Unless you take the line that I'm paying them for the priveledge of letting them collect my viewing habits to resell to marketters.

      Guess I'll get back to working on perfecting my MythTV setup, which I'm already liking better than TiVo. Even with a crappy old frame-grabber card. I'm just holding out for the word that Hauppages PVR500MCE has official ivtv support.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:oh man by uradu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's got less to do with others than with themselves. They worked hard to get the first product out, and then thought that the hard work was over. They haven't done anything truly innovative since v1.0, and never had a really good concept on how to make money beyond gouging customers $10 a month (later $13) for yet another TV guide. I've said it for a long time, they should have accessorized the TiVo like video game companies do, that's where the real money is. There's really not much of a "service" aspect to what TiVo does, and trying to artificially create one by selling the guide as such only angers those customers that see what's going on. They should have released their own branded external expansion hard drives (using 1394 over a proprietary connector if they wanted, to lower competition), they should have brought out external branded DVD or CD recorders and let the consumers burn shows (CD burners along with SVCD creation three years ago would have been the cat's meow, when DVD-Rs were still expensive), they should have offered unit-to-unit networking and cooperative recording and scheduling years ago, using their own branded Ethernet adapters, etc, etc, etc... Instead they took a good long nap and let the rest of the world pass them by. Oh well, I got my money's worth out of my TiVo, I won't be shedding a single tear when they pass.

    8. Re:oh man by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that Quicken is popular because Microsoft Money sucked....

    9. Re:oh man by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      "The product was good, service was good but the rest of the business world (mainly M$) did not want them around"

      No. they are failing because they had a worthless business model that was design by underpants gnomes.

      1. Make tivos
      2.????
      3. Profit.

      Their model just wasn't going to work. Since from the very start it was obvious that others would team up with the cable companies and deliver the same idea. Why would people go for Tivo over what their cable company gives them for free or builds into their bill. Tivo being better quality only goes so far, especially if someone has never used a Tivo.

      With a long enough time frame they would have no market, only those who got tivos when it was the only option, or people who decided against their cable company would go to them.

      Then you have their subscription. If you like tivo, you would sign up for life time, then they have no more constant stream. Its not like people are going to upgrade their boxes very often to where you can get them signing up for new lifetime memberships.

      In the end their business model just wasn't forward thinking or had any great plan to take over. They could only loose market share over time. And at some point at you loose market share you are just going to die. It doesn't matter if they keep adding customers, if that still outstrips the market growth, and their money eating.

      How the heck they have managed to be kept afloat this long is the amazing part.

    10. Re:oh man by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason Microsoft didn't kill Quicken is because the government wouldn't let them buy Intuit. If they had, Quicken would be dead and we'd all be using M$ Money, no matter how crappy it is.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:oh man by ti.payn · · Score: 1
      Great but do you ever consider that if TIVO needs to charge $12.95 /mo. on top of the box price that it (no matter how sweet) just might now be financially viable right now? I mean, that happens all the time. I could think of five great business ideas right now but weather or not they succeed will come down to if you can charge something the market will bear.

      As a consumer, I wouldn't mind the 12.95 fee personally (although I am more interested in a media PC than a Tivo at this point) but as an investor I know -- without a doubt -- that the vast majority of consumers have a very hard time understanding the value. Esp. when their cable company will front them a PCR for a few dollars extra a month. Yeah, it will suck but that's the point: It will have the price point to be viable. Even if it is an inferior product.

      I was a Tivo investor for years but I am 100% out of the stock now. I just don't see (as of today) what the company is doing that can fight against the generic PVR & media PC threats. Maybe the new CEO will have some ideas. Maybe he wont.

    12. Re:oh man by bushidocoder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't know where your "mainly M$" bit came from. MS competes with Tivo with its XP Home Media Center edition, of which they've shipped slightly above a million units, but the two aren't even in the same price area. In fact, given that at CES Microsoft announced a partnership with Tivo despite the competing product lines, I'd say Microsoft is a big fan of Tivo.

      Tivo is dying because cable companies subsidize the cost of the hardware, market it better, and charge less per month than Tivo does. Cox gives me two DVRs for free with digital cable, and charges me 8 dollars a month combined extra for the service for the two units. The unit itself has about 40 hours storage, is approximate in quality to the Tivo Series 1. Is it worth it for me to go out and spend 2x$199 replacing the hardware, only to then have to spend more than 20 bucks a month in service charges? Absolutely not.

    13. Re:oh man by bitmanx · · Score: 1

      DVR is not going away except your $$ from Tivo to the cable companies. Once they have you locked in it will only be a matter of time your cable company can charge you $13/mo for DVR service.

      When is it cheaper to build a MythTV or whatever other open source setup on pc hardware vs. a $70 Tivo box? $70 for a dedicated box which you couldn't come close to building yourself. For the cost of a PC w/tuner and say mythtv, that would equal a tivo and 2 years worth of subscription to equal out in costs. Not the mention the time to manage that pc with viruses, spyware and whatever else.

      No doubt Tivo has blown partner opportunities but the worst is not staying technically savvy. I mean how tough would it have been to offer cheaper subscription rates, referrals, and make the box have simple expandable storage. They have this huge communitiy of people but ignore this customer base's needs and improvements. I think of Tivo like AOL, greedy.

      Unfortunately improvements have come a little too late thats terrible being the pioneer. Screw Hollywood and there concerns and focus on the customer, remember they pay your bills..

    14. Re:oh man by uradu · · Score: 1

      I tell you what: you stop posting as AC and we'll see who's the moron then. While I haven't been the earliest of adopters, my HDR312 box is pushing up there in age, and I've certainly paid my dues all along (what exactly would the point be w/o the "service"?)

      All the new features you're talking about are little compared to the base functionality offered by the original product. They are also features offered by their competitor well ahead. But TiVo must be surely glad for all the unquestioning cheerleaders such as yourself, who have made their long nap possible.

      Incidentally, judging by your language, I think there's little doubt who the college kid is.

    15. Re:oh man by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes they did screw up.

      The main reason I bought a Replay TV box over a TiVo.

      DVarchive. the replay units are designed with ethernet from the beginning so that I can add 10 units all over my house and watch and command any of them. well there is a side effect this creates. DVarchive.

      A program that ACTS like a Replay TV box. so I can easily get content off it, create a "Super Replay" with 500 Gig of storage to act as a type of video server for the whole house as well as the capability to archive shows, remove commercials and burn to DVD for friends.

      none of this can be done with a Tivo without major hacks and abilities. the replay tv box get's this to everyone, even those that can barely use windows and thingks that Microsoft runs the internet.

      That is their failure, they fought against ethernet from day one, something that should have been on the box from version 0.5, they remove features from their current customers only serving to piss them off. Replay has not made any major changes cince the debut of the 5500 series and no features have been lost except the sharing of shows over the internet.... something that everyone expected to get killed the second the media companies heard of it.

      Most people I know with a Tivo Own one. Most replay owners own 2 or more because they interoperate and you get a discount for service on a second unit ($6.00 a month)

      Now Comcast is offering something that is missing my ability to remove files from the box, but it's free, and only has the monthly fee that is in line with tivo.
      Duh, you want to spend $100+ of your money on something that works like crap with your digital box (Yes, it does work crappy even replay sucks on the digital channels, no box on/off detection and you are never sure of channel changes.)

      or something that works perfectly with your digital box, can record a digital channel WHILE you watch another digital channel? something that is also 100% impossible with Tivo and Replay?

      comcast is going to utterly kill Tivo, they will end up like the replay, still serving customers but finding their corner as second or third banana and surviving.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:oh man by uradu · · Score: 1

      > Yes, it does work crappy even replay sucks on the digital channels,
      > no box on/off detection and you are never sure of channel changes

      Hang on now, the TiVo box works very well with my ancient serially controlled RCA DirecTV box. None of that IR blaster nonsense, of course, but channel control is rock solid via serial. You don't need on/off detection because there's no need to turn the sat box off, ever. Mine has been on non-stop since 1998 and is still going strong. And since I never see the sat box front-end because of TiVo, I don't care about its 1998 GUI and such.

      > something that works perfectly with your digital box, can record
      > a digital channel WHILE you watch another digital channel?
      > something that is also 100% impossible with Tivo and Replay?

      You mean like the DirevTV TiVo box (a.k.a. DirecTiVo)? Works very well re what you're saying, and since it's still a pre-series 2 box, it's also very hackable. Plus you can pick them up dirt cheap nowadays. Of course, no analog cable support at all, but hey!

      Other than that, I agree with you. Replay have definitely been pushing the edge, but they've also been sued to oblivion. I guess TiVo wanted to avoid that fate by keeping their heads low, but you only get so far by dancing with the devil. If they haven't pushed new features for fear of being sued by Hollywood, I guess this is how far you get with that policy.

    17. Re:oh man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what exactly would the point be w/o the "service"?

      A VCR? I know that MAD TV is on at 11:00 PM on Saturday and program it in, I never needed any of the "service". I don't want it to seek out old re-runs for me, I don't need to see that I have an incoming email scroll across the screen or season passes since the show is on at the same time, same station.
      In the beginning it was funny for people to talk about the suggestions generated by the system, but for me capacity is the only feature I really ever cared about.

    18. Re:oh man by Kaosaur · · Score: 1

      Funny.... Intuit just announced that they will stop selling Quicken at the end of this month. They are only continuing with QuickBooks, TaxCut and TurboTax. Quicken sucks and is a waste of money and even Intuit knows it now.

    19. Re:oh man by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Your "announcement" is early. It's over 2 months until April. :P

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    20. Re:oh man by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Now Comcast is offering something that is missing my ability to remove files from the box, but it's free, and only has the monthly fee that is in line with tivo. Duh, you want to spend $100+ of your money on something that works like crap with your digital box (Yes, it does work crappy even replay sucks on the digital channels, no box on/off detection and you are never sure of channel changes.)"

      You know...I tried digital cable awhile back (Cox cable down here). I found the 'extra' content available on it wasn't something I watched much...and I found the picture quality wasn't greatly improved over analog. I kept getting the blocky pixellation, etc.

      So, I justified my stand alone Tivo a couple years ago...by dropping digital cable...that extra money a month pretty much made the payments on my Tivo that I got at BB with the 12 month no interest charge....and I used my Xmas gift money I got to buy the lifetime support.

      So...no digital tv for me till it gets better quality...I can see that the satellite stuff it good...but, since I rent...not really available to have it all mounted up outside, that and the last 2 places I lived have trees blocking the SW sky...

      Anyway...I didn't find cable dig. tv to be worth the premium price...so, Tivo on analog worked out great.

      I"m currently finishing up a Myth box now...and when finished...will give my Tivo to my parents...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:oh man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every thing bad that happens in the Tech industry MS gets the blame....especially on /.

  5. Re:I think i got my first post by Overlanda · · Score: 0

    damn not quite - maybe next time. anyway back on topic - tivo's problem is they need to expand to more countries/networks. Why can't i get it in australia? and if i can why don't i know?

  6. The king is dead! Long live the king! by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where's my OpenCable Moxi?

    (Translation: Does it matter if TiVo dies as long as something better comes along?)

    1. Re:The king is dead! Long live the king! by cqnn · · Score: 1

      The question is, will the OpenCable Moxi beat
      the OpenCable Tivo to market?

    2. Re:The king is dead! Long live the king! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably doesn't matter Moxi seems to support the existing encryption standards - there are Motorola ones installed here in LA now and Moxi claim they are doing Scientific Atlanata ones too - so for 90% of the cable systems in the US OpenCable is really a non-issue for Moxi .... you just have to ask your cable company to support them

    3. Re:The king is dead! Long live the king! by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      you just have to ask your cable company to support [Moxi]

      And then they say "no" and you just have to go back to waiting for the OpenCable version.

    4. Re:The king is dead! Long live the king! by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Holy crap that thing is awesome!

  7. Exploding TV? by PopeAlien · · Score: 5, Funny

    'The fate of TiVo also highlights the dilemma facing a lot of "exploding TV" start-ups.',

    ok, I admit I'm not real familiar with the latest in television technology, but exploding TV's? what could possibly be the upside of that? faced with that sort of danger you'd definately want a TV-b-Gone. I'd say if their TV's are exploding TiVo's fate has definately been sealed.

    1. Re:Exploding TV? by tallbill · · Score: 1

      My friend used to love to pick up old TVs, plug them in overnight to charge them up, bring them to the shooting range and blow a hole through them so they would explode.

      Don't knock it till you try it.

  8. Mourning by tuxter · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I am constantly amazed by the absolutely shocking decisions made in relation to the TiVo. It is an outstanding product that could have made an absolute fortune, but has been totally hobbled by a insane business model and pathetic marketing. Shame.

    1. Re:Mourning by tuxter · · Score: 1

      redundant. Why?

    2. Re:Mourning by Brian+Brian · · Score: 1

      I agree with your points. But I also know for certain that many people simply don't understand it, what it does, how it can do for them. Remember that people can't set their VCR clocks so many don't stand a chance of understanding Tivo - as obvious as I think it is.

    3. Re:Mourning by tuxter · · Score: 1

      Fucktards. If they are that ignorant, they don't deserve to hold a licence, let alone watch TV.

    4. Re:Mourning by tdemark · · Score: 1

      but has been totally hobbled by a insane business model and pathetic marketing.

      Their business model not-withstanding, how you call their marketing "pathetic" when they've successfully turned their company name into a verb?

      - Tony

    5. Re:Mourning by tuxter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, their marketing is fantastic hey. It's so good the product is gonna fold.

    6. Re:Mourning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but has been totally hobbled by a insane business model and pathetic marketing

      Got any better ideas?

    7. Re:Mourning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The product is FANTASTIC. The service and company SUCK. It's like Apple. Somebody really needs to take down Steve Jobs/whoever runs TIVO and put another tech head in charge.

    8. Re:Mourning by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      The threw away the UK market by making a system that spammed TV programs (did it once [I was watching at the time and the only way to stop it was to power cycle the Tivo, then the spam was undeletable].. that about sealed their fate - if you ask anyone about Tivo here they say "Oh yes that's the one that spams tv programs" and that's the end of the conversation). Prior to that their only attempt at an advert was some lame 'it pauses live TV' to which the entire population went "Why the F*ck would I want to do that?" and stuck to their VCRs.

      That was at the time they were charging £600 (~$1000) for a hideous looking silver box that had only one tuner. They screwed up so badly they never got chance to make another.

      The US is a much bigger market - you have to screw up a *lot* to effectively drive yourself out of it, but with Tivo marketing I could believe they could do it, if the attempts at 'advertising' that I've seen are anything to go by.

    9. Re:Mourning by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      Part of the trouble seemed to be the link with Sky - not a lot of incentive for Sky to push TiVo when they already knew SkyPlus was in the pipeline.

      I just hope they release the guide data format if they do quit sending out updates - I already have a DigiGuide subscription, and I'd love to simply point the TiVo at that instead (especially for those stations where DG's got more accurate listings :)

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  9. I don't doubt it by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, I have to take issue with the claim that such technology, concepts, and products are not enough for a successful business. I think their success to this point is evidence enough of the power of this kind of product.

    On the other hand, I have to agree that Comcast has the power to propel TiVo into a different level of play. With that kind of support, they'd have a huge step up on all this exploding competition. That competition is finding ways to improve upon what TiVo already has - free listings, better storage, better interface, etc. Why compete directly when you could stand on the shoulders of Comcast?

  10. So how much is a MythTV? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, so if I can pick up a TiVo for a couple of hundred bucks, how much is a MythTV box? You need a fast pentium box with a large HD, right? Plus a video encoder. What's the cheapest MythTV box that I could put together that competes with a base TiVo?
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Okay, so if I can pick up a TiVo for a couple of hundred bucks, how much is a MythTV box? You need a fast pentium box with a large HD, right? Plus a video encoder. What's the cheapest MythTV box that I could put together that competes with a base TiVo?

      Couple of things here. First off you can get a baseline Tivo (40 hour) for $99 before rebates. I happened to pick mine up on special (after rebate) for $49.99.

      The 40 hour Tivo is really about a 25 hour Tivo if you are looking to not have super shit quality on all your recordings. The cost is also a lot more than $50 or $99 because you have to pay the bastards $12.99 a month (or $300 for life).

      Ok, so you get a Tivo and a lifetime subscription for $400. You would need to start comparing MythTV at that point. Most people would probably want to also add the extra $50 to $100 (depending on rebates) for a decent HD to equate to something you would probably have with MythTV (say 80GB to 120GB). I would figure the baseline MythTV box would have to start around $500 or so.

      Have at it boys.

    2. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have something like the PVR350, which has encoder and decoder, you don't need much CPU at all to use it simply as a TiVo-like device. I've read P2 266's working, I bet you could go even lower. Hell the Tivo is like a 33mhz MIPS, isn't it?

      Of course, a MythTV box could in theory do so much more: reencode stuff you want to keep in divx in the background, playback any sort of content you want, play games, stream both live tv and content to other clients, put as many tuners in it as there are PCI slots.

      I wouldn't compare MythTV to TiVo, I'd be inclined to compare it to Windows MCE. Of course, like all things linux, it's all flexible.

      I've been playing with Myth quite a bit, looking to replace my TiVo. I just cant get used to paying 14 bucks a month for the same TV listings I can get for free. That's all their service provides. The fact TiVo won't work without it, is completely artificial.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering you can get a new tivo box for $80, you would have to get some pretty dang cheap hardware to beat that with MythTV.

    4. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Depends on what kind of old hardware you have laying around, and that will determine what you should add to turn it into a MythTV.

      IFF (If and Only If) you have hardware encoding on your video/TV tuner card, MythTV will run on a lower end older CPU. www.byopvr.com claims 233MHz if you have hardware MPEG-2 encoding, but that seems fantastically optimistic. Keep in mind that hardware encoding is fairly expensive -- I just bought the USB-2 Hauppauge PVR for $150 at MicroCenter yesterday. (I'm sure they're cheaper on line, but I can afford instant gratification.) A faster CPU (1.8 GHz is adequate according to some people) will allow you to do software encoding, meaning you can get a cheapo video encoder for $50 or less.

      The larger the drives, the more content you can save. ReplayTV figures it in the neighborhood of 1GB per hour saved at crappy quality, maybe 3GB/hour for better. They don't need to be fast -- 5400 RPM IDE will do. If you have an old 20GB laying around, it's probably good enough.

      RAM, well, you'll need some. A CD-ROM drive is pretty much a minimum, but a DVD drive will let you playback DVDs. An ethernet connection is probably going to be useful. Audio hardware, you may need that too. There are reports that some on-board nVidia nForce 2 chipsets won't work with MythTV, so if that's your audio choice you might need a cheapo SoundBlaster Live! card. On-board video will probably also be adequate.

      And you may end up struggling with xmltv; trying to keep a TV listing grid current can be a challenge, depending on what country you live in.

      Bottom line: it certainly doesn't require an Athlon64 or a dual Xeon monster to run one of these. Like anything else, if you pay more you'll get more. There are people who have incorporated MAME consoles into their MythTVs, others build monster gaming machines and only use them as TVs when they're not online. Others simply want a fire-and-forget box like a ReplayTV or TiVo.

      All in all, your mileage will vary. You need to consider what assembling and maintaining all this will cost you personally in terms of time. Are you willing to put that much effort into a box you could have just picked up at Best Buy for $400 and never looked at again?

      --
      John
    5. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Tivo processor is an IBM PowerPC 403GCX. And yes it is a low power chip for embedded systems so it's not blazingly fast. I am not sure of the actual CPU speed used.
      BTW, IBM lists the part as costing $1.90.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    6. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the Mythtv option. The average computer geek has some spare parts, perhaps a second computer lying around so the cost for building a Mythtv box could be considerably cheaper. All you really need is a modest system (I'm using a P3 I built back in 2001) with 20-40 GB of space, a network card, a video capture card and some free time. There's no monthly service and you can burn your shows to CD or store them for viewing on a Windows PC. It has most, if not all of the features that Tivo has.

    7. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by elmegil · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I spent ~$750 18 months ago for one I was sure would work. I might have been able to spend less, but then I would have been risking poor performance and spending more in the long run to upgrade until it did work. That was a pretty conservative approach.

      Of course, a TiVo is only a couple hundred bucks, but a "lifetime subscription" is about $300, so I didn't really spend a huge amount more than the equivalent TiVo.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    8. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by sydsavage · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yep, a home built MythTV box is going to cost more than TiVo, and it's not exactly a plug and play experience. Here's an approximate breakdown of what I spent building mine:
      • $30 case
      • $70 motherboard (Shuttle MN31N)
      • $80 cpu (AMD Athlon XP 2500+)
      • $90 512 meg ram
      • $50 40 gig harddrive
      • $120 250 gig harddrive
      • $180 Hauppauge PVR-350
      • $80 DVD burner (not necessary, but nice to have)
      • Many, many hours getting the right combination of drivers, etc compiled
      Now, before anybody jumps all over me and says I could have saved $x here or there, I should point out that I originally built the computer to be a linux workstation, and then decided to try my hand at building a DVR. Originally, I spent $335, including shipping, to put together a decent box to run SuSE 9.1. I went for the Shuttle mobo so I wouldn't have to buy a seperate graphics card or sound card. This board has a twin VGA nVidia GeForce4 MX with shared memory, Realtek ALC650 audio, and onboard 1394 and USB 2.0. It is capable of digital audio out with the addition of a $30 header board. I went with the AMD processor because I wanted good performance, without spending too much. The board supports anything from a Duron 700 up to an Athlon XP3000+ (or possibly higher, I think that's all that was out when the documentation was printed).

      So, if you wanted to trim the price down further, you could find a motherboard with integrated graphics that has S-Video out, and then get the cheaper Hauppauge PVR-250 or another capture card. This will give up some quality, as the PVR-350's video out is allegedly much better than other graphics cards, but it's a trade-off for price. You could get by with a lot slower processor than mine. You can get buy with a lot less memory than I have. You could probably find a case for free or close to it.

      Another possible route would be to start with a Shuttle bare bones system, and add a Hauppauge or other capture card into the one PCI slot. I hope to add more capture cards to my system, so I ended up ruling out this solution.

      As far as the time I put into it, I consider that to be an education. Without a reason, I wouldn't normally get my hands so deep into the o/s internals. I learned a lot about kernel modules and how they work on this project.

      If you decide to do this, I highly recommend it. But don't go into it thinking it's a way to get cheap TiVo. It's a way to have fun building a cool project that you will (hopefully) enjoy long after the building is done. I still take a lot of pride in my system, and really enjoy showing it off to guests. And it does a whole lot more than TiVo, I should add.

    9. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by brad3378 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could probably find a case for free or close to it.

      Case? we don't need no stinkin' case!!!

      --

    10. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by jbr439 · · Score: 1

      I used an existing box that I still use as a 2nd desktop machine - here is my cost in Canadian dollars not including sales tax. Currently 1 Canadian dollar is about 0.82 US dollar. This was put together August 2004.

      1) $150 Hauppauge PVR-250
      2) $170 Seagate 200GB HD and USB 2.0 external enclosure
      3) $134 Hauppauge MediaMVP as MythTV frontend.

      The PVR-250 does hardware encoding and the MediaMVP does hardware decoding, so the only load on the CPU is serving the mpeg file via NFS during playback.

      It works very well and the only way anyone is taking my MythTV box from me is when they pry it out of my cold, dead fingers :-)

    11. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Plac3bo · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to add one other element that usually gets left out of this debate...service charge.

      I built my MythTV system for the experience, not because I thought it would save me money or be a superior DVR.

      That being said, I've been happily using my homebrew DVR for about 1.5 years now. I'm not exactly sure (so please correct me if I'm wrong), but I believe TiVo's service charge is approximately $12.00/month. This would mean my current savings on service charge alone is 12 * 18 = $216 and grows with every passing month.

    12. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link to this part/price?

    13. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Well, I believe that the Apple G3 is a PowerPC 750.

      Assuming there is some sanity to PowerPC CPU numbers (which don't have anything to do with mhz, btw), that 403GCX is not a very powerful CPU at all.

    14. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      How do you get program listings to your homebrew DVR?

      For example, how do you tell it to record Futurama and South Park? Is there some sort of public XML feed you're getting from your cable company, or what?

    15. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by farnsworth · · Score: 1
      Is there some sort of public XML feed ... ?

      Yes.

      It works quite well, actually.

      --

      There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

    16. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's my setup:

      Backend:
      AMD Athlon 1.4GHz CPU (hand-me-down)
      Motherboard (hand-me-down)
      512 MB RAM (hand-me-down)
      250 GB hard drive - $160 after rebate
      4x200GB SATA hard drives $800 (last year)
      3ware SATA 4 port RAID controller $300
      2x PVR 250s ($240)

      Frontend (diskless, boots from network):
      Via EPIA M10000 CPU+MB ($160)
      Case for Via ($80)
      256MB DDR2100 RAM ($60)

      So roughly $1800 for my setup which doesn't even count the cost of a CPU, memory, processor, and case for the backend nor the parts for the homemade IR receiver I had to solder together to be able to use a remote control with it. Would I do it again if I had the choice between a TiVo and MythTV? In a heartbeat, but I'm a geek and I enjoy this kind of stuff. MythTV isn't THAT hard to setup once you have all the hardware in place. With an Athlon XP 2400+ you wouldn't even need the hardware mpeg encoder cards, you could just use DivX with any old TV card that Video4Linux supports.

      My first MythTV setup had two $20 Hauppauge WinTV model 401 (dbx Stereo) cards I picked up on eBay. That machine had an Athlon XP 2400+ (which is what became my desktop when I waterfalled the 1.4GHz Athlon to be my backend with the hardware encoders) and was more than capable of encoding two DivX streams at once while playing another back for "live TV". Back then my frontend and backend were on the same system. What's that all mean to you? Absolutely nothing. Buy a TiVo if any of that sounds extreme to you and save yourself the headaches.

      By the way, if you run Debian it's very simple to install MythTV if you have MDZ's apt repository in your sources. Just do a apt-get install mythtv. The hard part of setting up a mythtv box is almost always just getting the stupid tuners to work with Linux. Once that part is done MythTV is a cakewalk to setup. Almost all the problems I had with my last box was finding the right PVR 250 kernel drivers that didn't flake out.

    17. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You can get a TiVo for DirecTV for $29.99 if you wait for a rebate deal. With a DirecTiVo, 40 hours of recording space is 40 hours of recording space, and everything is at full quality. Also, the monthly fee is only $4 a month instead of $12.99, and DirecTV is pretty much universally cheaper than cable.

      Oh, and they have dual tuners, and you can upgrade it to 140 hours for $70-80. With something like that out there, a DIY box can't come close to competing on cost.

    18. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by e.m.rainey · · Score: 1
      The cost is also a lot more than $50 or $99 because you have to pay the bastards $12.99 a month (or $300 for life).

      Is it any wonder they are having finacial trouble? With consumers with this kind of attitude, it should not be. TiVO provides a decent service for a relatively cheap price and they even give you the option to save money in the long haul with a lifetime subscription and for that they get called bastards. For $350 most people could put together just the hardware for a MythTV box. Then they have to spend their time building up the software; configuration, compilation, installation, more configuration. That time is a cost too. TiVO's service to you is the benifit of that time back, but of course you cannot appreciate that until you've experienced wasting it.
      --
      The next remark is false. The previous remark is true.
    19. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      The Tivo Series 1 will indeed work without the service. In fact, I had to use it without service for a few weeks because I didn't have phone service when I moved. It sucks, and is no better than a VCR, but it will work in half hour increments.

    20. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Trixter · · Score: 1

      Don't bother, just buy a ReplayTV. No ads, downloading shows to MPEG-2 or DVD over ethernet, commercial skipping, $50 (refurb). I honestly HONESTLY don't understand why people buy TiVo when ReplayTV is the better product!!

      MythTV is nice, but only from a hack-it-yourself standpoint. The hardware MPEG-2 encoder in a ReplayTV unit is extremely good so I never found the need to build my own Myth box to the tune of $500 or more...

    21. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by plover · · Score: 1
      This will give up some quality, as the PVR-350's video out is allegedly much better than other graphics cards,

      I'm just letting you know I can confirm this wholeheartedly. The PVR-USB2 delivers an image quality that I can say is "outstanding". I just replaced an ATI TV-Wonder PCI card that I never cared much for -- it always had odd artifacts, such as a repeating interference pattern (the pattern was present regardless of the image size I chose) and washed out color. The Hauppauge box just worked like magic, once I stuck it in the Hi-Speed USB hub instead of the USB 1.1 hub. Picture quality is superb, and the sound quality is equally good (and is properly sync'd with the video.)

      --
      John
    22. Re:So how much is a MythTV? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Serious question: How much time per month do you have to spend checking it for errors, and otherwise jacking with it?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  11. Very True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tivo is toast. It's a great product without question. The issue is that all the major cable companies (Comcast, Cox, etc.) are building those capabilities into the set top box.

    Over Christmas, my grandfather asked about Tivo because his brother had recently gotten one. He really didn't know quite what it was, but he wanted one. So, we went to all the consumer electronics shops and looked into it. It was going to be $100.00 bucks after a rebate, twelve bucks a month, and then he had to get some kind of phone line across the room to the back of the TV. They suggested a wireless phone jack, which was an extra $85 dollars or so.

    Instead of messing with all that, I stopped by the Cox office and they gave us a new cable box for free and the extra DVR functionality for an extra ten dollars a month over what he had already been paying. He's not going to notice a big difference between that and Tivo, so it's definitely "good enough".

    I like Tivo's announcement about Internet-oriented content, but I just don't think they have a chance. EVERYONE and his mother is going after the set top box "center of the digital living room lifestyle". This includes at least Sony, Cisco, Microsoft, Apple, Nintendo, all the set top box manufacturers and cable providers, as well as many other upstarts. People will want as few boxes as possible (hopefully one), so products like Tivo that don't have the depth of stickiness, that aren't the anchor of critical functionality (cable TV vs. VCR, if you absolutely had to choose which one would it be). As such, Tivo is in big, big, big trouble.

    1. Re:Very True by lightspawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Instead of messing with all that, I stopped by the Cox office and they gave us a new cable box for free and the extra DVR functionality for an extra ten dollars a month over what he had already been paying. He's not going to notice a big difference between that and Tivo, so it's definitely "good enough".


      But only because he's never used a TiVo.

      I own a TiVo, and hate hate hate using Cox's DVR, which has horrible usability issues, even apart from the response times (over a second for basic operations).

      As a random example - if you view a list and press page-down, you're now at the TOP of the next page. Pressing page-down again brings you to the bottom of the page and another press to the top of the next page.

      TiVo practically always does exactly what I expect when I press a button, and the layout is so convenient that I never have to look at the remote.

      I would gladly buy TiVo's UI people a round of drinks, but could get violent if I ever met Cox's DVR's developers (it looks like they have no UI people and let the programmers do it).

    2. Re:Very True by iocat · · Score: 1
      Why can't Tivo use a net connection? I live in an 85-year-old house. I have one phone jack and no land line service. I am not going to string 100+ feet of phone cable and restart a painful relationship with SBC so my girlfriend can time-delay What Not to Wear. Meanwhile, my WAP actually sits on top of my TV (I have a cable mdoem).

      Tivo sounds rad, but it's useless if it requires a land line.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    3. Re:Very True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TiVo does use a net connection, if you have a standalone Series 2 TiVo (but it doesn't work for DirecTV TiVos; DirecTV refuses to upgrade the TiVo software).

      You simply add a USB-to-Ethernet dongle, and hook it up to your LAN. You may need to upgrade your TiVo standalone software first, but once that is done, it is pretty easy to use your net connection instead of a phone line.

    4. Re:Very True by Skater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, the UI isn't the best. But I've been using mine for almost 2 years and it works okay, and it's slowly getting better (they make software updates to it - early on I was crashing the box on a regular basis).

      However, the price difference makes it worthwhile - for $10/month and no setup fee, no purchase, no contract, and two tuners, how can you go wrong? Plus, it's probably simpler than a Tivo in some respects: the Cox box is also your cable tuner, so you don't have to worry about setting two timers (one in Tivo, one in the cable box) and other such hassles.

      --RJ

    5. Re:Very True by lmsig · · Score: 2, Informative

      It requires a landline only at setup. After that you can use the net. This is of course stupid. Tech support told me it was only because they don't have the software to support the net connect on the boxes until it downloads an update. silly excuse.

      still, mine is hooked through a little 802.11 USB thing and works fin.

      --
      .plan!! what plan?
    6. Re:Very True by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      land line only for initial setup. at tivo website is a page telling which wireless devices work with it out of the box (usb interface). 5 seconds on google could have told you that...

    7. Re:Very True by timeOday · · Score: 1
      With all those competitors dogpiling on, I can see how TiVo's days are limited. But why are they half a billion in debt? Couldn't they have sold their boxes at a profit for a few years, then packed up and made off with fat bank accounts when the big boys showed up?

      Then again, if nobody is personally liable for the losses maybe it's better just to drive it into the ground.

    8. Re:Very True by johnwroach · · Score: 1

      It doesn't require a landline, even during the initial setup.

      There is an undocumented dialing prefix (#,4011 or something similar) that allows you to use the USB port for ethernet for the initial setup. I believe I remember hearing that you can't use wireless at this point, though.

      So get a USB-Ethernet adapter and string a long blue cable to your TV for an hour. After that, use wireless.

    9. Re:Very True by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Tivo is toast. It's a great product without question. The issue is that all the major cable companies (Comcast, Cox, etc.) are building those capabilities into the set top box.

      I switched from Comcast to satellite to get high definition dual tuner TiVo service. I may consider switching back to cable once the CableCard TiVos become available next year, because DirecTV has lagged in supporting recent TiVo features.

      It seems to me that TiVo has a major window of opportunity here. Once the CableCard 2.0 standard is available, TiVo will be able to offer all of the features of a high-definition cable box + DVR, and TiVo's monthly fee is not that different from what the cable companies are charging. They will even be able to compete with cable PPV by offering internet rental of Netflix titles direct to the user's HD.

      And since cable users don't own their cable boxes, they have no financial commitment, and can potentially be wooed to TiVo. I don't think TiVo will take over the cable box market from the cable companies, but they could well establish themselves as the videophile cable box. This seems to me a better gamble than trying to make a life as indentured servant to Comcast, pulling in just pennies a month per box.

    10. Re:Very True by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      My parents had the Comcast DVR abomination for two months. Then they asked me to help them pick out a TiVo and hook it up.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    11. Re:Very True by bushidocoder · · Score: 1
      My Tivo crapped out about a year and a half back and I didn't really want to spend the money to get a new one, so I went with Cox's DVR. It drove me crazy at first, but you're right - it has been getting progressively better. Just last month I noticed they finally put in the option to only record first run episodes, and back in October, a new option to burn out to DVD popped up.

      Not to mention that according to their rep, their HD DVR will be the same service charge and no hardware fee when it comes out of beta.

    12. Re:Very True by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Plus, it's probably simpler than a Tivo in some respects: the Cox box is also your cable tuner, so you don't have to worry about setting two timers (one in Tivo, one in the cable box) and other such hassles.


      Gotta agree with you. Having the DVR capabilities integrated with the TV guide interface makes recording only slightly more complicated than watching a program.

      I've seen several variations on cable-box interfaces (some butt-ugly and clunky), that's definnitely the kicker. Especially with digital cable since the Tivo may not be able to access the other channels.

      My PVR is from my cable company and I think it's the greatest.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:Very True by soulhuntre · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The COmcast DVR combo we have here rocks. I know a few folks who run TiVo's and while the interface is cute it isn't cute enough to warrent the extra price (hardware purchase) and obsolecense issues.

      It costs me an extra $5 a month to have a dual tuner DVR that is HDTV capable, perfectly integrated with my digital cable signal and effectively under infinite warrenty. If it dies, or if a better model comes out I just call Comcast and replace it for free.

      There is no feature of TiVo i woudl use that makes any difference compared to the hassle (ir remote repeaters? tape? missed channel changes? bite me TiVo).

      --
      --> Fight tyranny and repression.... read /. at -1!
    14. Re:Very True by daVinci1980 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      so you don't have to worry about setting two timers...
      Gotta agree with you. Having the DVR capabilities integrated with the TV guide interface


      What? You guys have clearly not used Tivo. There's no setting two timers. And Tivo comes with its own channel grid (TV Guide functionality) which has a pretty nice interface. When I want to record a show, I navigate to it (or search for it), and I can record it. I can set season passes to get all episodes, or first runs only. I can set how many episodes of the show to keep on the box for a particular show (so for example, 10 for the Simpsons and 5 for CSI). It uses fuzzy logic to suggest programs that it thinks I might like based on existing programs I record (if I want it to). Now it can even play music and show picture albums I store on my PC in the other room. Pretty much everytime I think 'gee, I wish they'd fix this about tivo,' I find the issue fixed within a matter of weeks with the regular software patches it receives.

      And yes, Tivo can access all of the channels that your cable box can receive--it's a unit that runs between your cable box (should you be unfortunate enough to have one) and your TV.

      I personally have to agree with the great-grandparent. The Tivo UI is really quite excellent, and one of the reasons that the box was worth $450 ($250 for the box, $200 for the lifetime subscription). Plus the fact that it runs linux. I thought you /. types would salivate over that.

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    15. Re:Very True by lys1123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, the price difference makes it worthwhile - for $10/month and no setup fee, no purchase, no contract, and two tuners, how can you go wrong? Plus, it's probably simpler than a Tivo in some respects: the Cox box is also your cable tuner, so you don't have to worry about setting two timers (one in Tivo, one in the cable box) and other such hassles.

      I have used both a Satellite (Non-TiVo) DVR and a TiVo (which I own). I was absolutely floored by how primitive the DVR was, and your comment about setting timers makes me wonder if the DVR you are using is also more primitive.

      I NEVER set a timer on my TiVo. I have had friends ask me when a show comes on, and I haven't got a clue. The reason is, I tell my TiVo what to record and it manages all of the details. I never have to set a timer on it or on my settop box (since TiVo changes the channels on the settop automatically before it starts recording).

      So, for example, I have a wishlist setup that records movies that were made in the 1920's. I have season passes that record specific shows. But I never have to even think about the details behind these recordings. I just turn on my T.V. and look at the list of what shows are waiting for me to watch.

      THAT is the beauty of TiVo and until I see another system that can abstract away the details as well as TiVo does I won't even consider switching.

    16. Re:Very True by Skater · · Score: 1

      If it sits after your cable box, then your cable box has to be tuned to the correct channel and turned on at the right time. Just like a VCR. In a different wiring configuration, it would be able to get the basic cable channels, but none of the digital, premium, etc. channels would be available to record.

    17. Re:Very True by Skater · · Score: 1

      No, you missed my point. I don't set timers either - I just click on a show and tell it to record either that single episode or all of the episodes or all of the episodes in that time slot.

      If your cable box is separate from your Tivo, AND you have premium or digital channels (i.e., those that require a box of some kind from your cable company), then the cable company's box has to be set to turn on at the right time and set the correct channel before the Tivo would be able to record anything.

      --RJ

    18. Re:Very True by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      My experiences with Charter were much better. They use Moxi boxes. Compared to my old Series 1 Tivo, the Moxi has a better looking interface (although a bit buggy still). The features are comparable to my Series 1 (and they have products rolling out this year to compete with the Series 2 Tivo). It also records HD content from Charter, and controls my Pay-per-view (they plan to have it control VOD by the end of the month).

      Moxi also has one more huge advantage over Tivo: I rent the box for $6/mo (it would be $9 if I didn't have a HD package). If I decide I don't like it, or they roll out a new DVR, I can just send this one back. No hardware to buy.

    19. Re:Very True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what. That doesn't mean you have to set two timers. It annoys me that someone like you, who has OBVIOUSLY never used a TiVo, would sit here arguing with poeple who HAVE used one. I will GUARANTEE you that I never once have had to set 2 timers. It's lovely that the cable boxes support this wonderful thing called IR, and that all TiVo needs to do is use an IR blaster (which comes free when you buy a TiVo) to simulate a remote control. It changes the channel for you at the correct time.

      Do you feel stupid now?

    20. Re:Very True by Skater · · Score: 1

      And how is setting up the IR blaster easier than just clicking in the guide to record something? And, when you do that, can you still watch a different show than you're recording? Or can you record two shows at once?

      Take it easy...you are really overreacting. I was simply explaining how it works and what I see as a potential problem with a Tivo/MythTV box/VCR. I'm not arguing with anyone.

    21. Re:Very True by Magnetic_Monopole · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I will probably switch to a ComCast box when they bring the dual-tuner models out.

      But I don't think that the boxes are either as easy to use or as powerful as Tivo. For instance, I missed a program (Gormengast) a few months ago that I decided that I should watch. But it wasn't on again. So I told my Tivo to capture anything named Gormengast and forgot about it. Months later, it was repeated, and presto, it appeared without effort. I'm also taping any program with several actors or by certain writers.

      And stuff like that. I don't think the ComCast boxes are as powerful. I don't know what the poster above is talking about as far as reliability problems go. The only defect in the service is that their program guide doesn't always have timely info on programs, so for instance it will ocassionally tape South Park repeats several times since it doesn't know that they are the same ones or not new. But that's minor.

    22. Re:Very True by dootbran · · Score: 1

      Some of us are lucky enough to not even need an IR blaster. My cable box just happens to have that nice serial port on the back to handle communication.

    23. Re:Very True by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Our Tivo is on a wireless phone jack, and reliability is horrendous. It seemed to work great for about six months, but now every ten days I have to spend all afternoon repeatedly trying to connect until it gets it right and gets new program data.

      Of course, it doesn't help that our satellite receiver has decided to become unable to receive certain channels.

    24. Re:Very True by gludington · · Score: 1
      And how is setting up the IR blaster easier than just clicking in the guide to record something?

      You are confused on how the TiVO works. You set up the IR blaster once, when you plug the TiVO in, and then you forget about it. It is not something you ever have to do again. If you prefer to record something by clicking on it in the guide, you can do it with TiVO. The interface is quite flexible and elegant.

      And, when you do that, can you still watch a different show than you're recording? Or can you record two shows at once?

      You can watch something different than what you are recording, but you cannot record two things at once (on my Series 2 -- perhaps a newer TiVO has addressed this, as people have asked for it ).

    25. Re:Very True by Skater · · Score: 1

      No, I know what the IR blaster is - the Cox DVR inexplicably included directions on it. I understand completely: I would have this device attached in front of my cable box that controls the cable box and looks strange.

      You have to agree that this is a hack solution at best - it'd be far nicer if the Tivo were able to descramble channels and decode digital TV (if it isn't able - I don't know whether it has that feature), because then it wouldn't need the IR blaster. That's how the Cox DVR works.

    26. Re:Very True by smatthew · · Score: 1

      Except the tivo handles that. Who turns off their cable box? Nobody I know who has cable ever turns it off.

      And the tivo includes a serial cable and an IR blaster. If your cable box has a port -the serial control is better, but both work just fine.

      The TiVo is not a dumb VCR. It knows how to take care of itself, and you.

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
    27. Re:Very True by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Cox and other cable providers, unfortunately for Tivo, controls it's set-top boxes, so can build DVR's that explicitly work with their service. Tivo is a universal service unit, so needed something that could work with EVERY set-top unit used in the countries it serves. The IR blaster is the only solution that works.

  12. Someone got it wrong. by FlatCatInASlatVat · · Score: 0

    All those bumper stickers that say "Kill your TV": Someone must have misunderstood and killed TiVo by mistake. Just another case of anything that is well designed, useful, tastes good or has some intrinsic value in this world disappearing, while all the junk sticks around endlessly.

    1. Re:Someone got it wrong. by servognome · · Score: 1

      Just another case of anything that is well designed, useful, tastes good or has some intrinsic value in this world disappearing, while all the junk sticks around endlessly.
      No it's a case of somebody creating a unique product, not adequately protecting the technology, and ending up drowned by an ocean of "me-too" products that have greater clout because of corporate tie-ins.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  13. First TechTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    First, TechTV and now TiVo? Damn you, Comcast!

    1. Re:First TechTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that motion.

      Comcast is pure evil! Pure evil from the Eighth Dimension!

      I don't think Comcast was ever serious about using TiVo. Why pay TiVo money when they could simply rip off TiVo's ideas, put together a crappy, inferior DVR for much less money, and market it to their captive audience?

      Even if they violate TiVo's patents, TiVo doesn't have the money to sue everyone doing this, and might be out of business before a court finally renders a decision a decade from now.

      Evil, evil, evil.

    2. Re:First TechTV? by MrCobaltBlue · · Score: 1

      Well they'd probably do the same thing, make it ComTivoCast or something, then gradually over time just make it Comcast in another series of destroying good things in life.

      --
      mount /dev/me
  14. Not surprising by Tiburana · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In order for Tivo to survive against the snarly market forces of TV they would have had to promise even more invasive advertising to replace the ads we skip over. In two years Tivo would (will?) end up looking like a cheesy free web page with banner ads and annoying pop-ups. I'd rather live in the moment and go to the bathroom during ad breaks.

  15. Well that's just great... by camcloud1 · · Score: 0

    The coolest invention to hit TV since the VCR and it's not even going to make it to Australia before it dies in the ass. I have been waiting for TiVo to hit down here for the past year and now it looks like that will be never be.

    1. Re:Well that's just great... by sjf · · Score: 1

      There's certainly no legitimate TiVo service in Australia, but for those willing to do a little work, there certainly are ways to get a TiVo to work in OZ:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=tivo+in+australia&i e=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

      And, you can thank Tridge (Andrew Tridgell for a lot of the groundwork for this.)

      -S

    2. Re:Well that's just great... by Vengeance_au · · Score: 1

      It has hit AU, just not "retail". The OzTiVo crew have got the solution humming, and its a beautiful thing.
      OzTiVo homepage
      Personally I have a MythTV box, but thats because of the higher geek-quotient involved :-) but I have set up OzTiVo's for friends and family who are less "techie", and just want something that works. Get the integrated network + cache card, a 200+ Gb hdd and a memory stick, and you are about $400 in for a solution that then costs $0/month down. The community group for OzTiVo keeps the listings pretty solid, so you should be very happy :-)

    3. Re:Well that's just great... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Does anyone produce a box (TIVO or otherwise) that would be able to directly access Foxtel listings (e.g. foxtel EPG or manually typed in or screen-scraped from foxtel website or whatever)

    4. Re:Well that's just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could take the money you'd spend importing & modding one, buy a Topfield TF5000PVRt, and have a 2 tuner digital PVR.

      Hassle the networks into providing a proper EPG, or play with the EPG uploader currently under development, and you've got what's basically a Tivo + MPEGgy-goodness...

    5. Re:Well that's just great... by Vengeance_au · · Score: 1

      The OzTiVo guys have both the cable and the sat data available for foxtel and optus, and the MythTV info can be grabbed using this beastie. Grabs foxtel, optus and all free to air around Australia.

      Enjoy :-)

    6. Re:Well that's just great... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Cool.
      Howcome foxtel dont make an EPG driven PVR for their digital service :(

  16. What TiVo needs to do. by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ditch the service.

    Open the box, screw this DRM'ed TivoToGo crap. Just open an SMB service, or ftp, or some such.

    Sell the box at a profit. I'd pay up to 500 bucks for one, that just worked - always, regardless of whether TiVo is still in business. It's still cheaper than rolling my own with MythTV, and a whole lot less of a hassle.

    Since that's not what they're going to do, since TivoToGo turned out to be useless - need a custom app to burn to DVD? And it's not out yet? And I'm supposed to buy what is basically the same Prassi/Stomp/Veritas software that I already have three copies of again for another 50 bucks?

    Anyways. I like the TiVo interface. Good riddance to the rest of it.

    I've been playing with MythTV. As soon as I get it working to my liking, my series 2 TiVo goes up on eBay. I'm getting there, it's nothing but time and effort.

    I already know it'll blow TiVo away, it'll stream recorded content and live TV via VideoLan, which I can watch on satellite boxes, which I plan to be no more than some hacked XBoxes. It'll have (at least) two tuners. It'll record to DVD-R without jumping through hoops. It'll grab content from the 'net.

    So on an offtopic note, anyone have an idea how support for the Hauppage PVR150MCE and 500MCE is going under ivtv? I got an itch to order the 500MCE (mmm two tuners, two encoders.. all for roughly the price of the 250), becuase it looks like it will be supported soon.. But I don't want to be stuck with a dud.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by dnadig · · Score: 1

      I know we are all in love with linux here, and I played with Myth to, but there's a number you are missing here:

      Microsoft MCE shipped 1.6 million units last year. Anyone care to guess how many WORKING Myth installations are out there?

      It sucks (MCE) it really isn't that great. Putting sage or snapstream on top of Meedio is vastly superior. Myth can get SORT of close, if you are careful, and don't need to talk to any windows machines.

      All of it kicks the crap out of Tivo

    2. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not terribly impressed with MCE. I don't care how much they ship, and I don't care if I'm the only guy with a working Myth box. So far I like what I've been able to get out of Myth. No slashbot can accuse me of being a linux zealot, I just like what Myth does so far.

      Myth has a long way to go. Out of the box it isn't there. Like I said, I've been working with it a lot, in the code and setup and whatnot. I plan to return anything worthwhile I come up with back to the project, if it's possible.

      I'm thinking of a parts list that any dope could go to CompUSA to buy and assemble, and a bootable ISO, that just makes it work. Take all the OS tinkering out of the middle. To me, this is what linux should be, where it belongs - task oriented distros that do what they do, and do it well. Hell, that's what TiVo is.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Anyone care to guess how many WORKING Myth installations are out there?

      n+1

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    4. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's already been done...I got a magazine (Atomic) that came with this already done. You could probably find it on the internet somewhere.

    5. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Ditch the service.

      2) Sell boxes at a loss.

      3) ?

      4) Profit!

    6. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by n6mod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft shipped 1.6 million MCE units because every Sony machine with a tuner card went out with MCE.

      MOST of these are being used as PC's, and if you aren't playing with a tuner card, you'll never know that it has MCE.

      Dad bought one (as a PC). He played with the MCE stuff a little before deciding it was totally useless and went back to the TiVo.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    7. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by scottcain · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind using one machine to collect the signal and another, smaller box to connect to the TV, you could do what this guy did and put it in a small wire box (like you would use for a paper tray).

    8. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Sell the box at a profit

      Ludicrous - no VC will fund you!

      Your competitors will underprice you!

      Your IPO will fall flat on its face!

      I wish I were joking here, but this is the reality. The tech world is so fscked right now I have to wonder what they're putting in Silicon Valley's water supply.

    9. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by greggman · · Score: 1

      Maybe in America but in Japan or at least Tokyo where people don't have space for both a TV and a computer, notebook PCs with MCE are being massively pushed.

      Most people under 30 live in an apartment with less than 200sqft.

    10. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sell the box at a profit. I'd pay up to 500 bucks for one, that just worked

      So far Apple has been about the only one to break away from the 'give away the razor and sell the blades' strategy. They can do it as they are Apple and have a cachet, there's no such thing in the PVR market.

    11. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Funny

      No wonder they save. If they buy stuff they don't have anywhere to put it! I thought my friends apartments in San Francisco were small! 200 sq ft is really small. Sometimes living in Oklahoma has its advantages (inexpensive housing & land).

    12. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by jeffphil · · Score: 1

      *2

      PVR Hardware database lists a few more.

    13. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by fwitness · · Score: 1

      "I plan to return anything worthwhile I come up with back to the project, if it's possible."

      Can you give me a script that can burn a show to DVD flawlessly? Better yet, one that I can use with a remote?

      I *love* my mythbox in it's cute little shuttle case, but burning dvds has been a major hassle. I can *never* seem to get it right. I guy named jams had a program called nuv2disc that worked ok for me awhile, but then I upgraded to his latest and things stopped working.

      I have no idea what I'm doing wrong, as the pvr350 I have outputs MPEG2 anyway, but for some reason I cannot seem to burn shows reliably. Mod me offtopic certainly, but if you do, send me a link to a really good linux dvd burning how to that is in english. Thanks.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
    14. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by bushidocoder · · Score: 1
      And despite Apple's success, Steve Jobs has said a thousand times he's not getting within 100 yards of the DVR hardware market. They're smart enough to know they can't compete with the cable companies right now, because their free solution is "good enough" for most consumers.

      More often than not, "Good enough" and cheap wins for emerging technologies. Look at Microsoft as a prime example of this. Its after everyone has the item in their home and gaining market share is a point of competition, not a point of nabbing virgin customers, that the quality war starts.

    15. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Except integrate with my DirecTV.

      Actually, what I'd like to see is a way to send the DTV signals to a receiver, then route the output of that through a machine I could then connect to from any room in the house. The DTV "$5 per TV" bullshit is annoying...

    16. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      They need to look at what took the mobile phone industry from startups and chip makers in the late 1990s to world domination today.

      Specifically, they moved from a contracts model to pay-as-you-go, they gave a load of extra services on-top (ringtones/games), they targeted kids, and they offered a killer app (SMS).

      I guess TiVo have to move to PAYG, offer downloadable content, target teenage girls, and finally offer a killer app (perhaps even SMS itself "OMG did u just c those SHoos?").

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    17. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by jbrasch · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do not need a custom app for tivo to go. Look in the tivo community forums for more info.

      Basically they have a webserver running on the tivo box that allows you to down load shows. Once downloaded you can use freely available tools along with your media key (available in your account information) to put your show in the format you want.

      Waiting for my software update to try it out.

    18. Re:What TiVo needs to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my friend has had lots of problem with his squeezebox can u help? first it makes the radios in the house hiss all over - i think internet radio is ok tho. then the slimserver crashed yesterday used lots of hard disk and then CRASH but the sqqueezebox started playing again after. and his remote dont work no more. what can he do?

  17. This is what I feared by earthforce_1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and why I would never buy any piece of hardware that relies on a subscription. All the more if they offer a "lifetime" subscription where you pay up front. People have fallen into this trap with health clubs as well - what is the chance that the company behind the hardware will outlive me?

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:This is what I feared by garcia · · Score: 1

      and why I would never buy any piece of hardware that relies on a subscription. All the more if they offer a "lifetime" subscription where you pay up front. People have fallen into this trap with health clubs as well - what is the chance that the company behind the hardware will outlive me?

      Well, in this case I think that because of how Tivo has been created (hardware and OS wise) and the fact that it has been relatively easy to hack Tivo units will continue to function in their current state for years to come.

      People who owned Tivos and find it dead will throw them up on Ebay for whoever to grab them. A team of hackers will have available changes to be made that will allow you to pull down the information for your CATV or SATTV and do the same shit as before.

      Yeah, it'll be a bit more difficult to get updates (as if they come all that frequently with Tivo as I'm STILL waiting for my 7.x update for Tivo2Go) and it might cause a bit of a struggle to get it working but after that it'll likely be much like MythTV is now.

      So, it was great that I paid for my Tivo unit when they were taking subscriptions because I ended up with a $50 unit that would have cost me at least $500 for MythTV and I will likely end up w/the same functionality.

      If they do die I'm crossing my fingers ;)

    2. Re:This is what I feared by fm6 · · Score: 1
      and why I would never buy any piece of hardware that relies on a subscription.
      Neither would I, but I did buy a TiVo. You don't have to pay a monthly fee -- you can get lifetime service for a flat fee. And it's the subscription that makes the product worth having, because the box uses the subscription to constantly dig up shows for you. Without it, the TiVo is just a glorified VCR.

      When I decided to get the box, my thought was, "A lifetime subscription costs less than two years of monthly subscription. Obviously I'm going to have the box for more than two years, or I shouldn't buy it at all." The flaw in my reasoning was that my box didn't last two years before it died.

    3. Re:This is what I feared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Insightful" my @ss.

      Replay has been through two bankrupties, and its users still have service. And they are in no danger of losing service.

      TiVo has already promised that they have a "dead man's switch" they can throw if they stop service that will allow basic service to continue if TiVo stops supporting users.

      And there is a huge hacking community out there already that knows how to provide service to TiVo boxes if TiVo should ever stop supporting users.

      But all that is extremely unlikely; the worst case scenario would be TiVo getting bought out by a larger company; TiVo is too big and has too many subscribers to simply disappear. It's not going to happen.

      If miniscule Replay can survive, TiVo's future by comparison is that much more secure (from the user's perspective) for many, many years to come.

      It's simply a matter of whether TiVo can survive as an independent company or not; it is not a question about whether users will continue to get service or not. No matter what happens, someone is going to acquire those users and continue to provide service in exchange for that monthly revenue stream.

      Abosulute worst case scenario (which isn't going to happen), the hacking community will provide ways to get service to TiVo boxes.

    4. Re:This is what I feared by rcastro0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and why I would never buy any piece of hardware that relies on a subscription

      You mean you don't have a cell-phone ?

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
    5. Re:This is what I feared by srleffler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I want a glorified VCR. I don't care if the box can go and find programs for me. I can pick which shows I want to record just fine on my own. All I want is a self-contained box that costs a couple hundred bucks, that will let me rewind and pause 'live' TV, and record shows at will without paying a subscription fee. Oh yeah, it should also replace my digital cable box (but I still don't want to pay a monthly rental/subscription fee for it.)

    6. Re:This is what I feared by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      and why I would never buy any piece of hardware that relies on a subscription. All the more if they offer a "lifetime" subscription where you pay up front. People have fallen into this trap with health clubs as well - what is the chance that the company behind the hardware will outlive me?

      Don't be dense. A lifetime subscription doesn't have to last forever to be worth it, it only has to last long enough to be cheaper than perpetual monthly fees. At this point, that's 23 months. If TiVo lasts 2 more years, "lifetime" is cheaper. I paid $199 more than two years ago-- I've saved more than that. If you have an objection to paying for the service at all that's one thing, but saying "lifetime" is a bad idea just shows ignorance of basic mathematics.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    7. Re:This is what I feared by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Fine, but we're not talking about what you want. We're talking about what people in general might want.

    8. Re:This is what I feared by srleffler · · Score: 1

      I think they will find, when they finally get around to selling such a box, that there is a far bigger market for it than there is for Tivos with their expensive subscriptions.

    9. Re:This is what I feared by pizen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or a regular phone?

    10. Re:This is what I feared by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How would you sell that to somebody who's just learned to program their VCR?

      Or to somebody who hasn't?

      I got a TiVO for Christmas with a six-month free subscription. The UI (and the TV guide) are almost bulletproof. $13/mo is steep, but if it frees me from the vagaries of TV schedules, if it saves me two Blockbuster rentals a month, it's worth it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:This is what I feared by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1
      I bought my ReplayTV in December 1999. I paid $200 more than a comparable TiVo device, for which I received a "lifetime" subscription to the service (vs. $9.95 / month from TiVo).

      So far I'm ahead about $400. And every month, another ten dollars more. Even having spent $699 for my original box, and another hundred or so to upgrade the hard disk last year, this has still been a fantastic investment.

      That said, even if TiVo doesn't die here, they would soon enough anyway when Apple releases the iTV.

    12. Re:This is what I feared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTV's subscription for TiVo is $4.95/mo. Why the hell is everyone freaking out about $4.95/mo???

    13. Re:This is what I feared by e40 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is some very strange disconnect going on here. The $4.95 I pay per month for my DirecTivo subscription is much MUCH less than I pay for my basic cell phone contract, and much less than my landline. That's probably the best $4.95 subscription I've EVER had. People, that's 2.5 Red Bulls. That's not even one movie.

    14. Re:This is what I feared by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Well, the ReplayTV experience would seem to suggest that it's not all doom and gloom.

      RTV went through about two cycles of going bankrupt and being sold; at no time did any of their owners make any noise about ditching the current owners -- in fact, they tried to make sure current owners knew that they weren't going to be abandoned.

      I wouldn't worry about it all that much (and not just because I use a better DVR than Tivo -- the aforementioned RTV :) ).

    15. Re:This is what I feared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sage TV anyone?

      This might be offtopic but i see these dvr discussions all the time and always notice mythtv and others popping up in the discussion, but never sage tv.

      I am really surprised that noone has ever mentioned sage tv http://www.sage.tv/ .

      Its very customizable through plug-ins, works out of the box with windows, and has a developers community that is always adding features, tweaking it and such. (Developing program is by invitation only although it appears anyone that shows interest in developing is given the program). Soon, they'll also have a media extender for $99. I'm going to use my computer as a dvr with my large harddrive and just use extenders throughout my house....

      Any other users out there?

    16. Re:This is what I feared by R.Caley · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You mean you don't have a cell-phone ?

      My cellphone doesn't depend on a subscription with one particular supplier. If the network I'm on went belly up I could just switch to another.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    17. Re:This is what I feared by smatthew · · Score: 1

      Yes, your cellphone does depend on a subscription with one particular supplier. Not only is it locked into a certain network technology, the phone has a "lock code" to prevent it from being used with another provider. Not to mention cell phone providers won't activate phones that aren't their own.

      Of course - that is in the US. I hear over in europe people aren't so locked in, with SIM cards and all.

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
    18. Re:This is what I feared by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      [...] Of course - that is in the US.

      Which makes it a pretty silly thing to say to someone you pick at random in an international forum, doesn't it...

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    19. Re:This is what I feared by Nemi · · Score: 1

      If the phone company that gives me service goes under, I can go to another phone company and use my hardware. Not so with Tivo.

    20. Re:This is what I feared by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      "People, that's 2.5 Red Bulls."

      OF COURSE!! why didnt I think of relating electronic purchases to 40 Oz Beers

      I think we have a new unit of measurement here. By my calculations the new 499$ Imac is aproximately 144 cans of Colt 45!!

      now to figure out a way to convert # of beers drunk to libraries of congress forgotten and we are home free

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    21. Re:This is what I feared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cellphone doesn't depend on a subscription with one particular supplier. If the network I'm on went belly up I could just switch to another.

      Wrong. Cellular handsets are sold at a loss by operators, and they recoup the initial loss in your subscription fee. Therefore they make very sure you cannot switch networks with the same handset. This is valid everywhere in the world. If at the end of a lengthy contract (after you paid enough subscription fees) you want to "unlock the phone" for other networks you may ask the operator nicely and they may allow. But it is their right not to.

      Hackerz have found ways around the lock, but hacking is not what the point is all about (TiVo is hackable as well). Cell phone makers do sell unlocked handsets, but it costs way more to the endclient -- mostly no one buys it this way.

    22. Re:This is what I feared by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      If at the end of a lengthy contract

      A year is hardly `lengthy'. And, of course, if the network went belly up to the point where there was no service, there would be no company to have a contract with, so you'd be free.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  18. So it goes... by wcitechnologies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The law of the bottom dollar says that if people can provide a service for themselves for free, they will. Most of them anyway. HTPCs increasingly become easier to build and cheaper to buy. Its always irked me that TiVo would charge you to use a device that you purchased legally. It'd be like Microsoft trying to charge me per megabyte to use my own hard drive. (I probably shouldn't even SAY that...) Ask yourself: how many people in the world still have milk delivered to their front doors? How many people still have their gas pumped by an attendant? How many people in the world will continue to pay for TiVo?

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
    1. Re:So it goes... by FlightTest · · Score: 2, Informative

      How many people still have their gas pumped by an attendant?

      Apparently, everyone in New Jersey and Oregon.

      --
      Merde, il pleut encore!
    2. Re:So it goes... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      This guys on fire!

      The ban on self-service gas stations is a highly combustible issue and makes for some heated debates

      It's all so punny I forgot to laugh.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:So it goes... by starman97 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess paying for DSS TV service must really bum you out, after all you bought the dish and reciever, the nerve of them expecting you to pay for the content. You pay for Internet Service, but you bought the firewall and your ethernet card...

      What Tivo owners are paying for is the directory service and database compilation that makes the search functions of the Tivo useful. If you want to use it as a simple PVR, yuo can buy a 1st generation box, they had enabled that feature.
      If you buy a Series2, you buy it knowing that it does not work without purchase of the Tivo Service. It says so on the Box. Tivo does not charge by the Gig, you can upgrade all models without incurring any extra charges.

      All but a very small minority of Tivo owners will continue to buy the serive as long as it is available at it's current pricing and features.
      What will kill them is if they disable commercial fast-forwards or jack the price or do some sort of pay per view for previously recorded shows. The second they do that they are dead.

      MythTV is free if you value your time. I dont have time to program or manually search for things to watch. I also dont have the interest to mess with building a linux box just to watch TV, for that, I'll buy a tivo and it's service and get on with working and playing with more interesting things.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    4. Re:So it goes... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ask yourself: how many people in the world still have milk delivered to their front doors?
      If the service were availabe in my area at a reasonable price, I would.

      How many people still have their gas pumped by an attendant?
      Everyone getting gas in the state of New Jersey, and me, whenever I am getting gas while dressed well, when it's cold out, etc., etc.

      I just don't get your point....HTPC's blow for non-techies in their current state.

      Most overlooked points past shitty UIs and complicated setup: you need a remote control....oh yeah, that's right, every one availabe for PCs sucks ass. High quality SVIDEO output still isn't there at a reasonable price. And not-so-expensive PCs tend to be noisy. And hot. And not shaped like the rest of my stereo/tv components.

      I deal with IT all day. When I come home and want to watch TV, that's what I want to do. Preiod. Not screw with some HTPC, or ssh into my hacked TiVo because the cron job to grab the listings failed.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    5. Re:So it goes... by Luke+Mewburn · · Score: 1
      You'd telnet instead of ssh into your hacked TiVo because the 50MHz PPC403GX would suck for ssh, just like old (pre-Ultra) SPARCs do.

      As for TiVo versus roll-your-own; I use a series 1 TiVo running the OzTiVo software (in Australia), and it rocks. I'll happily deal with the occasional glitch and the amateur quality guide data in order to watch TV how & when I want to. That said, if TiVo offered the service in Australia for a subscription fee I'd pay for it to get the reliable guide data (with episode # information, etc). Foxtel Digital is apparently bringing out a rebadged SkyPlus unit from the UK, but that doesn't do 30s skip / 8s replay, which is probably the killer app for me.

      Also; the TiVo GUI Just Works. Compare this with the crap UI in the yumcha DVRs & STBs.

    6. Re:So it goes... by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      Point taken, but for the record I still have milk delivered twice a week from a local dairy. The milk is fresher, tastes better and doesn't cost much more than buying it at the store. Besides with six people in the house we go through a lot of milk.

    7. Re:So it goes... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      The law of the bottom dollar says that if people can provide a service for themselves for free, they will. Most of them anyway. HTPCs increasingly become easier to build and cheaper to buy.

      Most people, including myself, would rather pay a premium for a system that's guaranteed to work out of the box than screw around making a homebrew system they may or may not work completely.

      You see that all the time. People buy furniture rather than make it. People buy clothes rather than make them. People pay to have the oil changed in their car. Not because they can't do it, but because they don't want to do it. Most appropriately, people buy computers rather than build them. Sure you could do any of these things, but you don't because there's other things you would rather do.

    8. Re:So it goes... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Ask yourself: how many people in the world still have milk delivered to their front doors?
      If the service were availabe in my area at a reasonable price, I would.


      Same here, my wife drinks a lot of milk.. and I'd love it if someone would drop off a gallon of milk every couple of days.


      How many people still have their gas pumped by an attendant?
      Everyone getting gas in the state of New Jersey, and me, whenever I am getting gas while dressed well, when it's cold out, etc., etc.


      At least 2 states require full-service now.. I think new hampshire is one of them, but I have no idea.

    9. Re:So it goes... by AdamGott · · Score: 1

      How much do you really think it costs to compile show information and send it out every couple of days? Not $13 per person (in bulk)! They backended the hardware cost and were hoping to recoup it that way and this profit model just isn't working for them. Why? Most people don't want to pay $13 per month for tv listings no matter what you tell them.

    10. Re:So it goes... by JayTeeUK · · Score: 1
      How many people still have their gas pumped by an attendant?
      Apparently, everyone in New Jersey and Oregon.
      From what I've seen, it's the norm in South Africa too. They even check your oil and water and clean your windscreen.
      --
      James Tait, Programmer and Free Software Advocate
      JID: jayteeuk@wyrddreams.org
    11. Re:So it goes... by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      Ask yourself: how many people in the world still have milk delivered to their front doors?

      Pffft, front door. The FreshDirect guy brings the boxes into my kitchen.

      How many people still have their gas pumped by an attendant?

      Well, everyone in New Jersey...

      How many people in the world will continue to pay for TiVo?

      I will. It beats the pants of the cable company provided DVRs. And if you consider time spent working on it as a cost, then TiVo is way cheaper than a MythTV box. Admittedly, many people will just get the DVR from their cable company, thinking (as so many do) that they're crafty consumers who have found the same product for a much lower price, since they haven't used a real TiVo and don't know what they're missing. But TiVo was always a luxury item. Hopefully their business model doesn't depend on every home in America paying for their service...

    12. Re:So it goes... by LazyBoy · · Score: 1
      Its always irked me that TiVo would charge you to use a device that you purchased legally.
      I get so tired of this argument. The vast majority of Americans prefer to pay over time.

      • Do you think a Tivo only costs $100 (or $0 after some rebate combinations) to make?
      • Do you think that cell phones are really free?
      Like you, I dislike recurring fees. So I considered the lifetime subscription as part of the cost of the box. The break even point was less than two years and I passed that a long time ago.

      Tivo gives you a choice of pay up front or pay for service. But some people would rather complain about one choice than take the other.

      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  19. Tivo couldn't keep up by slakdrgn · · Score: 1
    It isn't a huge supprise for me, as hard as the content providers and cable companies have been pushing on tivo. Add that to the price inceases a while back. Tivo was/is a concept, and a good one at that. Tivo started a tv revolution (basically), unfortunately, they couldn't keep up with it. They may die, they may not. They will always be remembered reguardless. They did the right things as far as community goes (being hack-friendly (are they still that?), fighting to keep control when dealing with content providers such as DirecTV, Comcast, etc..) but being community friendly does not equal being greedy business friendly. I'm not sure how true my statement is anymore, I haven't kept up, however, that is how it seems to me.


    They started something, something big that will/is forcing the content providers to change, if a bit forcefully. They just couldn't keep up.

    1. Re:Tivo couldn't keep up by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Troll

      They are not hack-friendly. The TivoToGo content is locked down via DRM. To burn to DVD-R you have to buy another burning app (essentially a kludged version of the same prassi RecordNow burning software everybody rebrands as their own).

      The new 40 hour Series 2.5's (the nightlight models) are locked down so the kernel is cryptographically signed, so you can't do anything with it.

      No commercial skip. No nothing.

      They're as far from hack-friendly as you can get.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Tivo couldn't keep up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What are you talking about? We do too have commercial skip on Series 2 TiVos.

      Use the select-play-select-3-0-select "hack" to enable 30 second skip, and there ya go.

    3. Re:Tivo couldn't keep up by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      The new 40 hour Series 2.5's (the nightlight models) are locked down so the kernel is cryptographically signed, so you can't do anything with it.

      That incidentally is a beautiful and totally legal way to completely trample ever practical and political objective the GPL is meant to achieve. It needs to be corrected, stat.

    4. Re:Tivo couldn't keep up by ezHiker · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about the Series 2.5's, but i just got done hacking my Series 2 DirecTV SD-DVR40 over the weekend.

      Now I have streaming directly to my PC, and I can transcode into various formats for burning using a tivo-ized version mplayer/mencoder. Installed lots of other cool stuff too like telnet, ftp, TivoWebPlus, etc.

      I found my Tivo to be very hackable. All I had to do was some googling to find the info on all of the hacks available for it.

  20. Too Bad, I was looking fwd to Tivo w/ cable tuner by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
    This will probably arrive far too late to save them if it ever makes it market anyway, at this point.

    Even if it does, they still would have the problem of selling it in any meaningful volume. They'd basically have the same problems marketing something with the cable tuner thrown in as they have now without it.

    Oh well, back to getting a MythTV box together.

    Since they're screwed anyway, I wonder if they'll just say fuggit and let you move whatever you want to onto and off of the Tivo box while they're in their death throws. It'd be a nice way for them to say goodbye to their loyal customer base while giving the content guys the bird on the way down.

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  21. Not all Bad News by rackman · · Score: 1

    With a company like Microsoft getting involved it might not be the last nail in the coffin. M$ has a history of running concept stocks and products. Anyone remember the tablet pc? http://www.tivo.com/5.3.1.1.asp?article=233

    1. Re:Not all Bad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own a Tablet PC. It works great for my purpose (note taking, web browsing and e-mail while moving around my office and home office). They seem to be selling more every year.

      You're an idiot for implying it's somehow forgotten in history.

  22. oh well by ksheff · · Score: 1

    I stopped watching TV regularly years ago and don't have a need for a TiVo like device. Unfortunately, this was a high profile linux device and I wouldn't be surprised if the cable monopolies teamed up with MSFT to create their new set tops. Yet another reason to avoid TV.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  23. TiVo has two things going for it by mveloso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    TiVo really has only two things going for it:

    * the program guide
    * the interface

    The program guide is really great, and the interface is incredibly easy to use.

    The problem seems to be TiVo spends a lot of its money on the boxes. Hardware costs for the TiVo boxes totalled $68,056,000 for the last nine months of the last fiscal year. That's a lot of hardware.

    They're also selling that hardware at a loss. HW Revenues were $60,823,000, with $29,508,000 in rebates. Ouch.

    There's not a lot that TiVo can do, financially.

    The TiVo service only cost $25,069,000 to run for those 9 months, while TiVo pulled in $81,311,000 in revenue. That means if they stopped selling TiVo boxes, they'd make money (though it's unclear from the revenue numbers if the tech revenues include partner hardware).

    That won't expand their customer base, though.

    Maybe they could spin off their guide business and license it to other box manufacturers? I'm sure TV Guide would love to buy it from them. It would free the guide to provide services to all the manufacturers, though they obviously have someone doing it already (who knows?).

    Maybe they could contract to get the hardware built more cheaply?

    The hardware is really killing them. Sure, they can't do a Microsoft (not at less than $1/subscriber/month for licensees). But they don't have to have high-end hardware either.

    1. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Quixote · · Score: 1
      The TiVo service only cost $25,069,000 to run for those 9 months, while TiVo pulled in $81,311,000 in revenue.

      How the heck can providing TV listings cost ~$3MM/month? I'm not questioning, I'm just wondering.

    2. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by UpLock · · Score: 1

      Ah, someone who gets it! They have always lost money on the boxes. The man who drove the cost of design down, TaWei Chen, left the company last year with a license to make Tivos run a service in China. The service itself actually takes fewer than 5 people to administer. Now ask yourself what the ~300 engineers on the payroll have been doing in the 5 years since launch? Bug fixes?

    3. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck can providing TV listings cost ~$3MM/month? I'm not questioning, I'm just wondering.

      They license it from Tribune News service. I can't imagine there's anyone else that does this so the Trib can name its price.

      It has to be a big money maker for Tribune as all that they do is collect info from the 1000 stations. Granted that's a lot of up front programming costs, but they could easily be making money after the first year.

    4. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Plac3bo · · Score: 1

      zap2it.com

    5. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by laird · · Score: 1

      zap2it.com is run by Tribune. :-)

    6. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      maybe the hardware costs are significantly higher because not all boxes were sold? hmm?

    7. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by djp928 · · Score: 1

      The one thing I want to know is, do other PVRs have TiVo's "Season Pass" feature, or something similar? If so, I won't miss TiVo that much, as long as DirecTV hooks me up with something similar when/if they dump it.

      -- Dave

    8. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've wondered how TiVo allocates its engineering staff too. The pace of software changes has been very slow for years. Especially for minor usability improvements users have been asking for.

    9. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TiVo UK has already abandoned hardware, and is just supplying the program guide. I don't know what sort of software upgrades they've been doling out, I haven't noticed any. But I wonder what the figures look like for the company here?

    10. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't have first-hand knowledge of other PVRs, but I've HEARD that they don't have Season Passes, Wishlists, or Suggestions.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      I wish I still had mod points to mod you up. (Although I have no idea if your "300" number is correct or not).

      This is definitely part of TiVo's problem. SageTV makes software for the PC that compares pretty well with TiVo, and the company is all of 2 people! OK, SageTV takes advantage of drivers written by others, and they buy the guide from Zap2it, but I still don't understand what TiVo is doing with their money.

    12. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      The pretty sizeable telephone based distribution architecture surely can't be cheap. That could eat lots of money.

    13. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by djp928 · · Score: 1

      Then what fucking good are they? I have a VCR that can just record stuff at a certain time if I want to manually do all that crap myself every damn time.

      -- Dave

    14. Re:TiVo has two things going for it by Moofie · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to aggressively move people to broadband.

      Which they haven't done.

      I love my TiVo (which is connected to my home LAN via wireless, although there was some hoop-jumping since I don't have a land line at all), but the moves the company's been making are...puzzling.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  24. regardless by zontroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even if they go bankrupt, look at replaytv...they were a startup and they went broke (people were buying tivo instead because of the much lower price because replaytv baked their lifetime price into the cost of the device)... sonicblue bought them and changed the model to match tivo but went bankrupt due to all the lawsuits over auto-commercial skip ... dnna bought the replay division from bankruptcy and is doing everything right: not investing too much in new features until the market makes it worthwhile while capitalizing on the slowly increasing market...

    the only reason tivo didn't go sooner was due to large corporate backing and partnering with directv... even if they go, they'll survive in some form because this industry is gonna happen one way or the other (the other being cable/satellite boxes, etc)

    1. Re:regardless by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I still have a ReplayTV 2020. I've upgraded it from 20 GB to 80 GB, and even that seems too small now (I save too many movies...).

      I have had this device since early 2000. That's over 5 years. I bought the "lifetime subscription" (you couldn't buy it without it back then; then price was about $200 more than Tivo, and was worth it because of the subscription difference). I haven't had any issues with the device that weren't caused by the cable company (i.e., downtime).

      I knew they were sold to SonicBlue, but didn't know they had been sold to DNNA. Nice to know, but my service hasn't even been interrupted. Go Replay!

      My only gripe is this old model doesn't save the captions, so I can't play it back with captions. (I like widening my peripheral vision...)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  25. All I have to say is.. Well, SHIT! by drfreak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I bought one for my parents for christmas and another for myself after playing with theirs. I love it and do not mind the monthly fee at all. I even networked my own TiVo to prepare for tivotogo. If tivo dies after I finally broke down and bought one, well, that would just suck the petrified shit out of a dead man's ass!

    1. Re:All I have to say is.. Well, SHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing with theirs, indeed.

  26. Re:first post by flyboy974 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think that this "First Post" is more "Troll" than offtopic. We are talking about the Comcast PVR vs. a Tivo. I have both. My Tivo went to with the kids and the ex. So, I thought I would try the Comcast PVR. So far, I've had the following problems with the Comcast PVR:
    • Sound dies if you process the power button on the remote accident. You have to unplug the unit.
    • Program audio can get into "skipping", where it'll play a frame, then skip a frame, play a frame, skip a frame. Only way to fix is to change channels. Reweind/FF/Pause doesn't change anything.
    • Locks up in the middle programs for no reason. Changing channels somtimes fixes it. When watching programs, you have to start over most of the time.
    • Disk drive is noisy (lots of clicking), no sound insulation here like Tivo has.
    • Channel changing is slow. No write cache. Pure raw disk IO it sounds like for all programs.
    • Multiple tuner support is clunky and broken. It will tell you that you are recording on the current one when you change channels, but, are really recoding on the other tuner. It gets confused easilly.
    • TiVo must have a patent on the "predictive response" when you press play. I can always nail that start of my programs with Tivo, but, on the Comcast I overshoot everything.
    • The FF/RW functions don't have a way to decrease the speed. (IE, I KNOW this is the last commercial, don't go in 32x fast forward, go slower to 4x FF).
    I have to say, I would have loved if TiVo was the Comcast PVR of choice. It's by far a better PVR system. But, re the post, I have to agree it's the nail in the coffin for them. I think the other nail is the intrusive advertising that they plan to do.
  27. Heh by yoey · · Score: 1

    You know, if the deal the CEO walked away from actually turned out to be the correct one, we'd all be saying how brilliant and gutsy this guy was.

  28. When it started: by mboverload · · Score: 1
    The day they gave in to broadcasters demands and restricted recording of NFL games and other shows. I was going to buy 4 Tivos, read it, 4 Tivos, for my house, but that pushed me other to MythTV.

    Pathetic. Even with this now TVtogo thing they put out, it STILL restricts what you can do with it. Since when do device makers have to be the broadcasters bitches?

    1. Re:When it started: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, sorry, TIVO jumped the shark well before then.

      Such as when they required a subscription instead of just selling a stand-alone unit like a VCR.

      Or when they started tracking user view statistics (I don't care how aggregated or anonymous they CLAIMED that tracking was. The point is, it is wrong behavior, and my VCR never did that to me).

      TIVO sucked before it even got started.

    2. Re:When it started: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only restriction from the NFL was realtime rebroadcasting of live games to locations outside of the broadcast area. Why does that bother you?

  29. No TiVo for me.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have Adelphia Digital Cable, and for a while I was tempted to get a TiVo. The cost was a little high, but I work odd hours and miss some of my favorite shows. I was tempted to get a TiVo until Adelphia offered a nice little DVR box for 9.99/mo with no up front payment.

    Adelphia isn't alone in offering these nice little DVRs, either. TiVo had a great idea, and now that everybody and their aunt Jan can offer a DVR for a low low price, I just can't see TiVo moving millions of units.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:No TiVo for me.. by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      For me the only good thing about working late nights is not having a chance to see any prime time TV.

      Some days I will have a day off or return early, and will torn on the TV around 8 pm and will be completely shocked at the awfullness of the shows. Or the fact that now commercials are actually inserted in the programming.

      But when I watch at night i can always get a seinfeld, simpsons or that 70s show rerun. So I get go to sleep without witnessing the next stage of commercialization of popular culture -- tv shows that are mostly commercials but are still interrupted for regular commercial breaks.

    2. Re:No TiVo for me.. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Commercials are already inserted into shows.

      Office space: Jennifer Aniston holding a 64oz cup of Pepsi.

      I don't know a SINGLE woman whose bladder is big enough to hold 64 oz of anything.

  30. Success? by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First, I have to take issue with the claim that such technology, concepts, and products are not enough for a successful business. I think their success to this point is evidence enough of the power of this kind of product.
    "Their success to this point"???!!! For a private company, success means profits. If not actual profits, then hopes of profits in the forseeable future. As the story mentions, they've lost half a billion dollars, and show no sign of going into the black.

    TiVo lovers (I used to be one myself) think this product is terminally cool because, when a TiVo box works correctly, it makes TV watching 100 times more enjoyable. But that, by itself, is not "success". Tivo lovers, though fanatical, are few and far between. TiVo has simply made too many mistakes. The platform is too klugy, so there's always been reliability issues. And if it does break, you have to send it back to the factory, for fees that approach the original purchase price. Even if nothing ever went wrong, most consumers just don't see such an expensive gadget as being worthwhile for what it does. This company is circling the drain.

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but good "technology, concepts, and products" is not a guarantee of success. There are other factors: marketing, management, timing, access to markets, and just plain luck. The few techies that get rich making some amazing breakthrough get all the press -- but most innovative tech companies fail.

    Which is true of all business. You can get very, very rich, but not without taking very, very big risks.

    1. Re:Success? by dant · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The platform is too klugy, so there's always been reliability issues.

      Erm, really? I've been a TiVo customer since almost the start--I've got two TiVo boxes of my own, and used a very-hacked third for years. I've seen problems with them, sure, but nothing I would blame on TiVo itself.

      What sort of reliability issues are you talking about? Whatever they are, they're all news to me.

      Now, TiVo's business prospects are a completely different matter, and I do fear they will die before the non-techie public realizes what they can do.

    2. Re:Success? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Their success to this point"???!!! For a private company, success means profits. If not actual profits, then hopes of profits in the forseeable future. As the story mentions, they've lost half a billion dollars, and show no sign of going into the black.

      You mean PUBLIC company. Or more specifically publically traded company. Private companies gauge success on whatever their crazy owner decides success is.

    3. Re:Success? by JWhitlock · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Their success to this point"???!!! For a private company, success means profits. If not actual profits, then hopes of profits in the forseeable future. As the story mentions, they've lost half a billion dollars, and show no sign of going into the black.

      That "half-a-billion" dollar figure is misleading. That's the IPO money, spent in the dotcom days when a good business plan was to spend millions just to get market share. And spend they did. Very little of that IPO money is left.

      They are currently scraping by quarter to quarter, and losing a few million in cash each quarter. But they have millions in the bank, so they can afford to burn some. Almost all their costs are business costs - they have no remaining debt to finance.

      Yes, I wouldn't call TiVo a success either. They wouldn't make make a good case study for business school, at least not at this point. But it is not as bleak as the half a billion figure looks.

      Consider the MIT graduate, whose parents paid the whole $100,000+ tuition, after grants and scholarships. You might find that he is a net loss for his investors, of perhaps a half a million dollars. But, he has a degree from MIT, a job with a great starting salary, and no student loans. He's not a success yet, but he has a good start. And, just like the folks that bought TIVO at the IPO prices and held on to them, the kid's parents shouldn't expect to see that money back any time soon.

    4. Re:Success? by JWhitlock · · Score: 1
      I'm in the same situation - my Series 1 is rock solid, and just works. If the hard drive did fail, I might even be able to replace it myself.

      The parent might be talking about the Series 2 boxes, which use customized hardware and must be sent back to the factory. My friend had a hard drive failure after the warranty ran out, and had to pay for a reconditioned unit, that wasn't working out of the box. I'm helping her to hook up the third unit tonight. She may have paid over $100 for shipping and replacement units.

      I have no idea if she is just unlucky, or if there are real problems with Series 2 boxes or TiVo customer support. It does make me reconsider replacing my Series 1 any time soon.

    5. Re:Success? by autophile · · Score: 1
      As the story mentions, they've lost half a billion dollars

      Have they looked under the sofa?

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    6. Re:Success? by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Unless TiVo used a batch of bad hard drives, a hard drive failure isn't necessarily a sign of broader problems. If you've ever dealt with a reasonable sized population of computers, you know that hard drives fail fairly regularly.

      FWIW, as a single data point, I've had no problem with my TiVo Series 2 since I bought it about six months ago.

    7. Re:Success? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      My Series 1 14G Tivo has been running since I won it in March 2000. I really couldn't live without it, and I'm afraid to put in the TivoNet card and a bigger hard drive for fear of killing it. :-/

      Anyone out there hacked the Tivo remote yet? :-) I really like the thing... If Tivo went out of business, if we had to rewrite the interface, I'd want to continue using the remote.

    8. Re:Success? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd call them a success either, not in the traditional sense. But they DID create the PVR market.

    9. Re:Success? by JWhitlock · · Score: 1
      I don't want a storm of "my TiVo is OK messages", but it seemed bizzare that my friend has one hard drive failure after a year of use, and then the hard drive of the next one was bad out of the box. As I said, unlucky, or maybe TiVo's QA is slipping.

      I checked air flow, no problem, and I'd expect hiccups from the other AV devices if the power was bad.

  31. DirecTiVo / CES by deviator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was at CES. DirecTV is dropping TiVo for their own new custom-built upcoming DVRs. From what I understand DirecTV currently provides some life support for TiVo in the form of a rather inexpensive licensing/subscription fee for each user--but that will go away.

    The interface is incredible; the remote is the best I've ever used for anything; the programming guide is extremely good... but anyone and their Mom can hack together a DVR at this point (not that it'll be as good as TiVo).

    1. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Dear DirectTV: Too Damn Bad For You.

      I'm with you. I LOVE my DirectTiVo and have turned on 2 other people in the last 6 months alone. The thing is a WONDER. As I've said (here and in person) I would gladly pay $20 a month for the little box. Really, there is nothing keeping me on DirecTV but the TiVo. My cable is horrid, but I could get dish. The moment my TiVo stops working because they pull the plug, that's the moment I find someone else. If Dish has a TiVo (GENUINE TiVo) then I'll switch to them in a hearbeat. If Comcrap offers a genuine TiVo that can do what I want (I love the dual tuners) and they fix their quality problems, I'll switch to them. If DirecTV takes away my TiVo, they lose a great customer and spokesperson.

      This leads me to my next point. TiVo may die (as a company), but the interface will live on. Lets face it, if you take any other DVR on the market, give it half decent performance (which would be much better than some of the ones out there right now), give it the TiVo interface and you're golden. There is nothing special about the TiVo other than it's fantastic UI. I think that if they can't get things going, they should start licensing out the UI to everyone and their brother.

      As to all those who say there is nothing special about TiVo, you haven't used one. No one who has used one for any ammount of time would say that. There is something special about them, VERY special. If computer interfaces worked as well, there would be no training classes or "Dummies" books.

      Last of all, Comcast was their SECOND chance. I think they missed the boat with DirecTV. If they could have gotten DirecTV to give out DirecTiVos standard they would be set for life. Even if they only did it for 6 months (and offered 6 months free TiVo service to those customers) by the time those people got used to those TiVos, they wouldn't be able to go back and DirecTV would have a killer feature: a REAL TiVo. People would rave about them. More sales, more fans, more and more and more. That was a golden opportunity. The Comcast deal was their second chance.

      I love my little TiVo. And when it ceases to function as intended because someone decided to cut guide data, I will be out there with all the other TiVo fanatics trying to make an opensource guide data server so my little TiVo can continue to live on. I can't go back. I WON'T go back. I NEED my TiVo. I... just... love it... so much... *sobs*

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by deviator · · Score: 1

      The rep assured me they were *not* going to stop supporting DirecTiVos as long as they're out in the field - but don't look forward to Home Media Option, Folders or TiVoToGo.

      She did say there's a software update coming out soon that improves performance. But that sounds like it's about it.

      If you want the advanced features, you'll have to go with the new DVR.

      I think *we* see the benefits of TiVo - but with the market becoming as saturated as it is, Joe User (who does not sleep/eat/breathe this stuff) can't tell the difference and will take 1) things that are offered free by other providers, or 2) cheapest over best. Commoditization...

    3. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by deviator · · Score: 1

      and I should add -

      One answer to this is to pull the rug out from under everyone else, and create a STANDARD, OPEN-SOURCE DVR that has the interface you want. Something that's actually easy to use and implement. That would shake up the market a bit.

      But the subscription service is where (I think) TiVo really shines - and there'd be no way to duplicate the quality of that database for free.

    4. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I was at CES. DirecTV is dropping TiVo for their own new custom-built upcoming DVRs. From what I understand DirecTV currently provides some life support for TiVo in the form of a rather inexpensive licensing/subscription fee for each user--but that will go away.

      Unlikely. DirecTV has their problems, but one thing they are very good at is maintaining support. They are still supporting Ultimate TV DirecTV units which have been out of production for years. And there are a lot of those DirecTiVo DVRs out there. Pissing all of those customers off would be suicide.

    5. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody's gonna piss them off. DTV is just going to turn around and offer them a better* DVR for pennies or even for free. Murdoch has proven before that most people will jump at the chance for free, better* hardware. He likes giving away set-top boxes. DirecTV is at a point where growth is slowing because most people who want DBS already have it. A free DVR is one way to get new customers.

      *Better = more or less the same. Most people are not saavy enough to tell Tivo from anything else, so tossing in some small new features will be enough to call it better.

      But there is much more to it than replacing Tivo. The new DVR will also introduce DirecTV's MPEG-4 capability and become the "standard DirecTV reciever" that everybody gets. You won't be able to buy a plain non-DVR box. DirecTV NEEDS to move to MPEG-4 NOW. They are out of bandwidth and have no room for the must-carry HD that will hit them hard starting in 2006.

      A year or two after the new DVR comes out, DirecTV will announce that the old standard receivers and DirecTivo boxes are obsolete (they will not be MPEG-4 capable, you see) and you will have a year, maybe two, to switch to the new low-cost or free DVR.

      Then the day will come when the existing MPEG-2 DirecTV data stream is turned off once and for all, except perhaps for a barker channel and maybe not even that.

      I'd say your current DTV recievers and DirecTivos have four years at most before they are toast.

      I have a DirecTivo and absolutely love the thing. Can't imaging watching TV without it. But I miss the features offered to standalone Tivo owners, and right now we DirecTV customers are not getting them because DirecTV and Tivo hate each other. If DirecTV intros their own box, it stands to reason we might see much more innovation (at least at first) instead of the current blame game and stagnation.

      The writing on the wall spells doom for Tivo. I figure they get bought out by somebody this year, prolly for under 500 mil. Maybe Virgin. And they will become a licensed out brand name rather than a specific hardware-software platform.

    6. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Nobody's gonna piss them off. DTV is just going to turn around and offer them a better* DVR for pennies or even for free.

      Keep in mind that all of those existing SD DirecTiVo units are only costing DirecTV $1/month (and DirecTV charges customers $5/month). DirecTV hasn't bothered to switch out UltimateTV owners, so why would they switch SD DirecTiVo owners?

      But there is much more to it than replacing Tivo. The new DVR will also introduce DirecTV's MPEG-4 capability and become the "standard DirecTV reciever" that everybody gets. You won't be able to buy a plain non-DVR box. DirecTV NEEDS to move to MPEG-4 NOW. They are out of bandwidth and have no room for the must-carry HD that will hit them hard starting in 2006.

      The only MPEG-4 that they are adding in 2006 is HD locals. They plan to switch other HD channels to MPEG-4 sometime in the more distant future. No mention of switching SD channels to MPEG-4, and it probably doesn't make much sense. The potential bandwidth savings are less for SD, and the cost much greater, because they'd have to replace all of those thousands of SD receivers. HD is less problematic, because the market penetration is lower. The one case where they may need to offer a replacement or upgrade is the new HD DirecTiVo units. They have not yet announced what they plan to do here. It is a small enough number of units that they could probably afford to replace them if necessary. In any case, it won't be an issue for a few years. The HD DirecTiVo units get HD locals over the air, so most won't miss not having access to the new local HD MPEG-4 stations (which will also require an additional dish). So it won't be an issue for a few years, anyway.

      Personally, if DirecTV drops TiVo altogether, I'll drop DirecTV. I switched from cable to DirecTV specifically for TiVo. If they abandon TiVo, I'll go back to cable. And with the CableCard HD TiVo DVRs coming out in a year or so, I'll probably be able to do so without losing features--presumably, I'd gain the TiVo enhancements like HMO that DirecTV has been so slow in rolling out.

    7. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by Pendragn_tk · · Score: 1
      The rep assured me they were *not* going to stop supporting DirecTiVos as long as they're out in the field - but don't look forward to Home Media Option, Folders or TiVoToGo.
      There is already a DTiVo that has Folders, the RT10. So it looks like either your rep didn't know what they were talking, or you're making stuff up. tk
    8. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by mikeage · · Score: 1

      You _like_ the new UI?

      I'm involved in the project (Conditional Access -- the security folks), and this box horrifies me! I mean, the Tivo UI is beautiful, clean, and functional. The new SUE1/SUE2 UI, which came straight from a committee at DTV, is horrible, IMHO.

      On the other hand, the box has some incredibly nice features (like purchase from disk-- record now, then decide later if you actually if you want buy, and great interactive application potential).

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    9. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I've heard that they'll be upgrading the software on existing Series 2 DTivos to include folders. Though I wouldn't hold my breath for HMO or Tivo2Go.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re:DirecTiVo / CES by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I was a bit confused by what he said at first too, but I realized that he was talking about the TiVo UI when he was saying that it was good.

      BTW I work for TiVo so I am biased.

  32. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, hard drive = lots of clicking.. sounds like your problem there, duh. ever think your box has a bad hard drive. Geez.

  33. Re:Too Bad, I was looking fwd to Tivo w/ cable tun by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    It'd be nice for them to play by the spirit of the OS on which they attempted to build their empire - and release all the code that's on the TiVo box, so we can hack them to get listings from XMLTV, or whatever, and keep using them.

    Or roll our own, or roll the code into Myth, or whatever. There's some good stuff there (well besides the DRM)

    Instead, they'll go bankrupt, and I'll have a nice combination nightlight and paperweight.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  34. Scientific Atlanta and Tivo by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    SA should buy out Tivo and incorporate their technology into their cable boxes. Tivo would then live on and SA would then actually have the ability to make a good box.

    1. Re:Scientific Atlanta and Tivo by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

      The Scientific Atlanta boxes are great. I have a HDTV Scientific Atlanta box from my cable company.

      Personally, I just can't give up a two-tuner digital cable box. Integrating the PVR and the digital box in one really is key- and that can only happen by the vendor of your cable provider's network.

      -M

      --

      when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  35. The MPAA/RIAA/DRM/BroadcastFlag/Powell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /FCC/Fritz septfecta succeeded/will succeed in killing Tivo.

    Anything beyond the control of the cable and media cartels will be killed at any cost. We have the FCC killing any dsl beyond the baby bells, by allowing the baby bells to let their copper die through neglect (which has been paid for by consumers many times over through tax deductions on infrastructure during and after deregulation) while they install fiber through the same consumer paid-for-through-tax-deductions infrastructure, while preventing resellers from accessing/sharing the fiber at reasonable costs. My dsl reseller currently pays more for my connection than I would if I purchased directly from my baby bell. On top of that, add cost of reseller isp dns servers, mail servers, other servers, add costs of support, all the other costs, and the baby bells are getting away with murder.

    And at the same time, Powell and the FCC do nothing to ensure that end users are allowed to run servers, are allowed to use their dsl (or cable) connections for various purposes (ssh is considered running a server, vpn is considered business class, no mail server, no web server, p2p is considered running a server, so are many other uses). If I'm stuck with 2 sellers, baby bell and cable monopolies, at the very least, Powell and the FCC have to mandate that the common carriers are really common carriers, they have no control over what ports of the internet an end user uses, the entire internet is available to every user.

    What good is pushing for an internet infrastructure like Korea has, with 100 mbps connections, when the local monopolies get to control what you can do, with such simple things as vpn, ssh, and similar vital services. Should we all use telnet?

    If it is left to Powell, we'll end up with what others have already predicted, an entertainment device controlled by the entertainment cartel. Computing will be dead. Once the baby bells succeed in their single-minded mission of fiber everywhere so they don't have to share their lines with anyone, any guess as to which way prices will go? Choices on what you can or can't do with your connection? Speeds? Really believe you'll get the same speeds with fiber now than you will when the line-sharing competition is out of business? Really believe you'll get upload speeds equal to download? How about a 20 mbps download with a 128 Kbps upload, due to newly discovered "problems" or bandwidth "hogs".

    Tivo is just a small subset of the overall problem.

    As an aside, how do you use a tivo box that doesn't come from the cable company, if you have cable with a cable set-top box? Is it possible? What functionality does one lose?

    1. Re:The MPAA/RIAA/DRM/BroadcastFlag/Powell by gr3y · · Score: 1

      Fucking rebel. Really, it's that simple.

      --
      Slashdot is my Mercer Box.
    2. Re:The MPAA/RIAA/DRM/BroadcastFlag/Powell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As an aside, how do you use a tivo box that doesn't come from the cable company, if you have cable with a cable set-top box? Is it possible? What functionality does one lose?
      Yes it is quite possible; millions of us have been doing it for years. I've been doing it with my TiVos since summer of 2000.

      Some cable boxes (and satellite boxes) can be controlled by TiVo with a serial cable.

      Otherwise, one uses an IR blaster. This is a cable that sends infrared remote control signals from the TiVo to the cable box.

      When TiVo wants to change the channel to record something, it tells the IR blaster to change the channel on the cable box.

      You have to chose the right cable box code and speed, but after some experimenting it is easy to get this to work when you set up your TiVo. Some people have problem with IR interference and so they cover their cable box and IR blaster with a "fort" built out of cardboard or whatever, to prevent the possibility of faulty channel changes due to interference.

      I have had nearly 100% successful channel changes with my TiVos; the only time I have lost a channel change in years was when I was in the same room as the TiVo and was using my remote to control the volume whilst one of the TiVos was trying to change channels - this is rare, but it can happen.

      On the whole, it isn't a perfect solution, but it is better than being in thrall to the cable companies, and TiVo is just better than all the other DVRs, including Replay (which I also use), period.

      The IR blaster does slow down channel changing, but unless you are addicted to channel surfing, this should not be an issue. Once you get used to TiVo, you will probably, like most people, get over your addiction to channel surfing, and just start to enjoying watching what you want to watch, when you want to watch it, rather than aimlessly surfing TV hoping to find something worth watching.
  36. The reason I have a Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want/have a need for digital cable or satellite so I don't have a built in box. Building my own would be a more expensive pain in the ass procedure.

    I want a commercially available one pre-built. There are not a lot of options in that market.

  37. LEADING ANALYSTS CONFIRM IT... by GET+THE+FACTS! · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Windows has lower TCO than Linux and Tivo combined!!!

    Tivo is DYING.

    --
    Our plan is working -- GET THE FACTS!
    1. Re:LEADING ANALYSTS CONFIRM IT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, that's like saying "Windows has a lower TCO than all other OSes combined." Duh.

      Emphasis mine, but since it IS my comment, whose else would it be? Bastards trying to take my emphasis.

      Nemosomen -- AC since parent is sure to be modded into oblivion soon, and then I'll get an OT mod.

  38. And I just bought a Tivo around Christmas! by doormat · · Score: 1

    Good thing I didnt purchase the lifetime sub.

    I dont think Tivo will die. They will probably suck for a while, they need to get their cablecard system out this summer instead of next year. It really frustrates me that they annouce a product like TivoToGo and then take a year to deploy it because the FCC wont stand up for fair use and tell the MPAA to fuck off.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  39. Most people miss the point of TiVo by WalletBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think most people miss the point of TiVo especially when they say things like "I can just build a MythTV box or I can do this on a computer..."

    What makesTiVo really great isn't the box, or the interface, or any of the generic PVR features, it's the TiVo service that makes it great and you lose that with everything else. It's the service that's worth it for me and what I don't mind paying for it. All these other PVRs are just hard-drive based VCRs with a GUI. Even a TiVo box is just a hard-drive VCR with a GUI without the TiVo service.

    Sure you can get other PVR solutions to download TV-listings and they probably have something like TiVo's season pass where it can follow shows you have season passes to and tape them whenever they air (even if they are pre-empted). The one thing I don't know if anyone else has is the TiVo suggestions. I have my TiVo so well trained I don't have to use the TV listings anymore. My TiVo picks out most of what I watch for me. It's like hiring a personal secretary who knows your tastes.

    After I come home for work and eat dinner, I usually have enough shows on my TiVo that TiVo picked for me to keep me entertained until I go to bed a couple of hours later. I don't have to surf channels, I don't even have to look at any listing to see if it's something I might like to watch and tell my PVR to tape it. It's gotten to the point where sometimes I don't even know what's on TV anymore and I don't care because I have more than enough shows I like to watch waiting for me each evening. I don't have to spend 20 minutes each day scrolling through a program listing of 500 channels to find the one program I might like to watch tomorrow and tell my PVR to tape it. For me I don't mind paying $12.95 a month if it means saving me 20 minutes a day in front of a computer or on a TV menu doing "prep-work" for my evening's TV watching. I will sorely miss this if TiVo were to go away.

    1. Re:Most people miss the point of TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have total control over what you watch and when you watch it.

      There are huge companies who don't want you to have that much control and they will do anything in their power to take it away from you. That is why Tivo will die. It cannot be allowed to exist.

    2. Re:Most people miss the point of TiVo by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 1
      After I come home for work and eat dinner, I usually have enough shows on my TiVo that TiVo picked for me to keep me entertained until I go to bed a couple of hours later.
      God - that is depressing. I have no doubt that TiVo can provide, through its suggestions, a constant stream of programming sufficient to hold your attention through your every free hour... but I can only find it deeply frightening.
  40. All we need... by solios · · Score: 1

    ... is some halfway decent PVR software that does what TiVo does. Price it at, say, fiddy bux. Modern hardware's good enough to work it on the fly- all it has to do is be smart enough to recognize various sources of audio and video input, basic tuning faccilities, etc. and be EASY. TO. USE. None of this homebrew shit that causes your mom to lose interest.

    Oh, and make the software cross platform. From the number of people spunking their pants over OMFG MAC MINI SET TOP BAWX!!!!!!!!!11111 SQUIRT!, fuck- it would go like hotcakes.

    Especially considering how much of a pain in the ass the bittorrent scene has insisted on making itself over the past few weeks/months. :|

    1. Re:All we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Price it at, say, fiddy bux. Modern hardware's good enough to work it on the fly-

      And how many $50 boxes have you built?

  41. Re:I think i got my first post by rc3105-Riley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1) you can get it in australia

    2) you're just not that bright?

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&c 2c off=1&q=tivo+australia&spell=1

  42. Tivo's time to go nuclear...heh, heh, heh.... by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 1

    I've never had a problem with the Tivo hardware. I really like it. I've almost bought one a few times.... But, as with a lot of the other people posting here, I had a problem with paying $12/month (I think that's it) for the electronic equiv. of TV Guide. This has always kept me from getting one. Well, that and one more thing....

    What REALLY burned me though, was the stories of overnight "downgrades" and the EULA with crap about how "Company reserves the right to alter the user experience at will..blah..blah..." I think everyone remembers hearing something about TIVO caving into industry demands to remove features that Hollywood didn't like....

    Now that Comcast has signed their warrant, it's time for Tivo to strike back and destroy a few other control based business models that come from Hollywood....

    1) How about FREE programming guides, paid for by advertising in the corners. I get that crap currently in the corner of my Comcast menu, and I PAY for that service.

    2) How about putting in/back ALL of the features that users want!

    3) How about offering up the source for Tivo units to the community as GPL and allowing anyone who wants to, to hack their unit with all the best possible free tools? I know that someone will point me to some of the sites on the web, I've seen them. I also know that they exist at the pleasure of Tivo, and by reading the boards, nobody really wants to do anything that would piss the overlords off too much. When I say access, I mean the whole shebam, with no lurking around bb's looking for clues as to how to activate the commercial skip feature or whatever.

    Tivo could strike back here, it's not too late to save the platform if they act now. Comcast doesn't want to play? They think that they can homebrew an answer and keep all the money? Fine! How about we let EVERYONE know how this sucker works and turn the dogs out on you.

    I think that quick action, in the vein of Mozilla organization/license for the platform would make the Tivo platform IMPOSSIBLE to stop. If they wait too long, their platform will be marginalized and will be worthless. Now's the time to move. If they do, they could still save a tidy business in selling specialty hardware and would get additional revenue from ads on the guides. Of course, it wouldn't be the same fat cut they took before, but it would keep them alive. AND by keeping it open, they would deny the monopoly lock for others.

    If Tivo were to do something like that.... i.e. free feeds based on advertising and an open platform with the features I want, I'd go buy one tommorrow. Hell, I'd buy three, one for really watching and two for experiments.

    The GPL is radioactive to companies that get their market share based upon control and healthy food for companies that offer service and quality. I think it's time to start throwing the nukes around just to show big media who's in charge....The customer! This could happen just in time to clear the "broadcast flag" crap scheduled for hardware this July! Scorched earth for big media!

    1. Re:Tivo's time to go nuclear...heh, heh, heh.... by servognome · · Score: 1

      Now's the time to move. If they do, they could still save a tidy business in selling specialty hardware and would get additional revenue from ads on the guides. Of course, it wouldn't be the same fat cut they took before, but it would keep them alive.
      More likely they'd sell off their technology to the highest bidder. The Tivo type service has moved upstream to be bundled with the cable service. The cable service companies can offer everything Tivo can, but Tivo cannot do the opposite; that is why they are in a no win position.
      I think that quick action, in the vein of Mozilla organization/license for the platform would make the Tivo platform IMPOSSIBLE to stop.
      Besides the hobbiest geek, who would buy a Tivo or a similar product? The average user will get their box and service from the cable/dish company (for $5 a month), and be content. It's the same reason people overwhelmingly use Internet Explorer. Most people won't go searching around the internet, messing with various hardware and software to skip commercials. They'll be lazy and live with their cable company service, unless something very compelling in the vein of IE security issues pop up; and even then most people wouldn't care.
      Tivo right now is in a position to sell out their technology, and more importantly their name (think Cablevision Personal Video Center, powered by Tivo). They would more likely sell out, than fade into obscurity, scraping by on nickles and dimes they get from hobbyists.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:Tivo's time to go nuclear...heh, heh, heh.... by fishbowl · · Score: 1



      >What REALLY burned me though, was the stories of
      >overnight "downgrades" and the EULA with crap about
      >how "Company reserves the right to alter the user
      >experience at will..blah..blah..." I think everyone
      >remembers hearing something about TIVO caving into
      >industry demands to remove features that Hollywood
      >didn't like....

      I never bought a Tivo, and you have just listed the reasons.

      Maybe Tivo can live forever as the word that means TV Recorder, like Frigidaire meant refrigerator, and Xerox still means photocopier...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  43. Maybe something like ... by jamienk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sell a quiet, stylish set-top computer with TV and stereo out, remote control, and wireless. This could be sort of like the MiniMac with Myth front end or a modded xBox, but this model should have lots of CPU and RAM. Build in DVD writer. Rather than emphasizing the recording TV side (this could be a Firewire add-on), emphasize the ability to easily play any format, however acquired. Quiet, cute external hard-drives could be added and daisy-chained.

    Also sell cheap, stylish dumb terminals with bootable network card, and set-top box ready to serve. These could look like the new iMac, nice monitor, nice keyboard, nice mouse, but with low CPU, no HD, little RAM, etc. This way you can get away with charging a lot for the set-top, as much as or more than a good computer: it doubles as your server ... just add dumb terminals, up to 10 or 20.

    This is the winning combo of 2005. The MiniMac and Xbox2 are light on power, skimpy on playable formats, and not ready to serve as dumb-terminals. They discourage bigger drives, don't burn CDs/DVDs, and don't come with wireless.

    1. Re:Maybe something like ... by @madeus · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the winning combo of 2005. The MiniMac and Xbox2 are light on power, skimpy on playable formats, and not ready to serve as dumb-terminals. They discourage bigger drives, don't burnCDs/DVDs, and don't come with wireless.

      Of course, Mac Mini does allow you to connect Firewire and USB hard disks, and even chain them ('Quiet, cute external hard-drives could be added and daisy-chained.'.), burn CD's and DVD's and comes with 802.11g and BlueTooth if desired and supports all the formats you could reasonably want thanks to Mplayer, the VLAN client and QuickTime.

      And with reference to Sell a quiet, stylish set-top computer with TV and stereo out, remote control, and wireless. both a cheap TV out (S-Video) and Remote Control are suggested as options when you buy one via the US Online Apple Store. Oh and it has a 'bootable network card' too, FWIW.

      Some of these are avalible on all models (like CD/VCD burning) and some are options (like 802.11g and DVD burning) but your asked to specify each option when your order online so it's not as if you can 'miss' them when ordering.

      Another good option that meets the description for a thin client (with video, stereo and 100 Mb Ethernet, but not native wireless) is the Sun Ray platform (which I have two), which now supports Linux x86 as well as Solaris SPARC as server platform, but it's somewhat complex to configure and has heft price tag for for multiple clients (not for the hardware, which is very cheap, but for the software licences, though technically it runs fine with out the little bits of paper *cough*).

      A slew of cheap thin client devices (DVD support, wireless access to multiple video formats from a PC over a network share) are actually in development now, performance is not all that great and they have a lot of issues though (like poor quality video playback over wireless as they play the entire MPEG 2/4 file from hard disk file share, rather than as truley streamed video).

  44. And when they go belly up... by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    ... there won't be the loyalty to prevent people from hacking the authentication source, and we'll see ebay flooded with 2nd hand Tivos... and people will modify them like they do leftover internet appliances.

    And I'll see my purchase go the way of the 1st generation DVD players: Given away to my neighbor in exchange for his kid mowing my lawn ;)

  45. whats going to happen to my DirecTiVo by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    I pay $5 a month for the Tivo software and get my listings from DirecTV as usual.

    I get all the normal TiVo functionality plus dual tuner support (all the good TV is on at the same time, it's called competition) and it's all without all the encoding, decoding and reincoding with standalone TiVos.

    I'm guessing DirecTV's replacement for TiVo isn't going to have the same functinality. It will probably be worse.

  46. Right on schedule? by Monoman · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems like we get a Tivo doomsday article every 3-4 months.

    http://slashdot.org/search.pl?query=tivo

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re:Right on schedule? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      TiVo, the new Apple.

    2. Re:Right on schedule? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Well, ever since *BSD died, they need a new morbidity drone :)

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. P2P streaming will replace the PVR concept anyway by popo · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone out there who honestly believes that these non-networked (or barely network-capable) digital PVR's are the end-game anyway?

    Don't get me wrong, I love my TiVo (although HD would be nice), but don't we all really want access to what's on everyone *else's* TiVo -- streamed instantly across a P2P network.

    Just wait until broadcasters join the chorus of RIAA whiners...

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  49. And more on the way... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Hard drives do die after all. How much longer will some of the older TiVo's out there last? True, this could be a wonderful opportunity for TiVo, but given their track record on taking advange of wonderful opportunities...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:And more on the way... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative
      If hard drives were the weak point in the TV design, it wouldn't be all that bad. HDs don't cost a lot to replace, after all.

      Early TiVos were notorious for being shipped with flaky modems. But what really screws people over is the fact that the software upgrade process isn't failsafe. That is, software upgrades often fail, leaving the system nonfunctional, or nearly so, with no way to back things out. Hackers can re-image the system on their own, but most customers don't have that kind of skill. And you don't even have to option of refusing an upgrade!

    2. Re:And more on the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...the TiVo is setup with multiple fail-safe measures when it comes to software updates. Hell, the machine has 2 functioning versions of the TiVo software on it at all times. If something goes wrong with the update the machine will switch back to the original partition.
      Modem failures on the original Series 1 TiVos were common. System failures after software updates....not so much.

    3. Re:And more on the way... by firedeveloper · · Score: 1

      Hey Sorry to burst your bubble, but I have had a TiVo since July 1999, and have NEVER had a software upgrade fail on any of my Three TiVos.. If you have, perhaps your hacks were not done correctly.

    4. Re:And more on the way... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I never hacked my TiVo.

      Every time I remind people of TiVo's quality problems, I get a bunch of responses from people who haven't had any trouble -- and of course that "proves" that I'm on LSD. That's like insisting that Russian Roulette is a safe pastime, since most people survive the experience.

  50. DRM killed the tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just that these companies will ship their own boxes. It's that they will be able to leverage the channel encryption in their favor to make their boxes work better. You don't really need to hastle with encoding the streams or multiple tuners and whatnot. The digital cable stream is already an MPEG and all you have to do is decode it or save it directly to the hard drive with the encryption key. This greatly simplifies your hardware requirements and gives you a better result because you're not recompressing an already compressed image. Tivo will die shortly after the providers bundle a good enough version of the features with their boxes (that you need to have anyway to use their service).

  51. Wins and Losses. by bort27 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've had my TiVo for over 4 years now. I love it to death. I think that TiVo did a hell of a lot of things right. Some quick examples:

    1. Unlike, say, Microsoft, they never discouraged their users from hacking their boxes. As a result, a huge community of TiVo hackers emerged (see http://www.tivocommunity.com/). I upgraded my TiVo's 30 gig hard drive to two 120's, and installed a cachecard/network card combo from 9th Tee, which means I can do fun tricks like scheduling shows and season passes from the road, or watching shows in my bedroom on my XBOX.

    2. Really great support. I've only had to call TiVo a couple of times, both for channel lineup issues, but they were always extremely friendly and helpful over the phone. For example, after I moved into my new house, I realized that Adelphia had just upgraded the cable in my area, and TiVo didn't have the lineup yet. So I called support, and the next day, TiVo called me back to tell me that my lineup was added. Simply awesome.

    3. Choosing Linux. When I telnet into my TiVo, I get a bash shell. I've installed an ftp server, web server (TiVoWeb), and even installed cron. How cool is that? Plus, this excellent decision has led to new software being developed exclusively for the TiVo (such as a caller id display that uses the TiVo's built-in modem, so you can see who's calling without getting up off the couch). Simply brilliant.

    4. The interface. They obviously put a ton of work into it, and it really shows. It just kicks so much ass.

    Now obviously, they dropped the ball in a couple of areas. The Comcast merger was just a more recent one. I think these are the two biggies:

    1. I think that their biggest problem has always been slow adoption; as long as I've had the thing, I've been seeing ads pop up on TiVo Central giving me hot deals on new TiVo units, which I'm supposed to share with my friends and family. Great, I can save Dad $50 on his new unit. But if they really expect me to convince Dad that he can't live without a season pass on those Seinfeld reruns he loves so much, then they should be giving me the 50 smackers. I'd probably have 10 people signed up under me right now if I got some sort of compensation for it. (By the way, click here to get a free Mini Mac!) :-)

    2. Too expensive. The hardware and service together really do cost too much, unless you got in early like I did (back when lifetime service was $200). They should do what my damn cell phone company does: Knock the hardware down to like $99, and make me pay a very affordable $9.95 a month. If I try to cancel before 2 years are up, hit me with some obscene early termination fee. Yes, I hate it when cell phone companies do this, but that's how they stay in business. Besides, it's not like I'd be foolish enough to cancel my TiVo service anyway. TiVo is heroin. So far, I've paid $499 for TiVo and lifetime service, so TiVo won't make any more money off of me. If they were using my above plan, I would have paid in $589 so far, with more coming in every month.

    I would really hate to see TiVo go. I hope they don't. But I suspect that even if the service dies, thanks to the openness of their hardware platform, someone (maybe me) will figure out how to write a script to pull show data off of Yahoo! TV or something. And with Microsoft and MythTV and several others entering the PVR market, there's no question that TiVo's invention is here to stay.

    bort.

    --
    Free, Anonymous surfing: Pagewash.com.
    1. Re:Wins and Losses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd probably have 10 people signed up under me right now if I got some sort of compensation for it

      It may not be cash, but look at this:

      https://www3.tivo.com/tivo-com/rewards/prizes/show .do

    2. Re:Wins and Losses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make me pay a very affordable $9.95 a month. If I try to cancel before 2 years are up, hit me with some obscene early termination fee

      The problem is, I don't really think customer retention is their problem. It's customer acquisition. I suspect only a very small minority of customers cancel before 2 years anyway. There is no point on offering a discount for a 2 year lock in when most customers will stay for 2 years anyway. In effect, all it does is cost them money with nothing gained. Whether or not the increased volume will make up for the lost profit is a different matter, it has nothing to do with lock in.

    3. Re:Wins and Losses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      blah blah blah blah compensation for it. (By the way, click here to get a free Mini Mac!) :-)
      *PLONK*

      -5, Whore

    4. Re:Wins and Losses. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      What the lifetime subscription did was increase early revenue to bolster marketing and sales, vs. spreading it out over several years. When product lifetime is measured in months or quarters, it's a smart move.

  52. Half-a-Billion Smackers? by KidSock · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity I've checked Yahoo! finance and AFAICT TiVo was profitable this year and has almost a 100 million in cash. Can someone explain to me where the "half billion" in net losses is coming from?

    1. Re:Half-a-Billion Smackers? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      Just out of curiosity I've checked Yahoo! finance and AFAICT TiVo was profitable this year and has almost a 100 million in cash. Can someone explain to me where the "half billion" in net losses is coming from?

      They're half a billion in debt, but are currently making a profit. Frankly, the link to the "half billion" figure is to some jackass "Business 2.0" staff writer's personal weblog. This "Om Malik" guy doesn't really impress me. He's a lower-tier writer with questionable opinions. Frankly, anyone who looks only at debt while ignoring profits is a dunce. The /. article lapping it up is the typical misunderstanding of the world of finance. Nobody seems to understand the difference between "defecit" and "debt".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Half-a-Billion Smackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, those misunderstanding the difference should apply for a job in the current administration. It's a guarenteed job!

  53. The article says nothing of the sort by fermion · · Score: 1
    The NYT merely states that the new cable deal fell through, that thier current cable partner is affiliated with a competing PVR, and that the current executive will be replaced with someone more able to deal with the cable companies.

    The big guys are notorious for setting up deals that spell the end of the little guy. The big guys don't care because they will roll thier own or find someone else to do the work of the now bankrupt firm. It could be that TiVo was not so greedy for immidiate bonuses and saw through to the long term. We really cannot know.

    More likely the cable cos probably wanted more strict DRM, and TiVo wants to differentiate it's player by provided cable unfreindly features. The new director may very well cave into the cable interests, and the consumer may lose all fair use rights.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  54. I'm not so sure. by n6mod · · Score: 1

    If you were to RTFA, you'd see that TiVo was going to get less than $1/sub out of Comcast.

    If they can get the CableCard unit to market soon, then they're in a much better position. They'll have a better product, for about the same monthly cost, with the same level of integration as the DirecTiVo boxes.

    And they'll get 10x the revenue per sub.

    I'd guess that the Comcast deal had some non-competes that put a serious crimp in the CableCard boxes' chance of seeing daylight.

    So maybe this wasn't the wrong decision after all.

    -Z

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  55. That was the Replay strategy by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    What you're recommending Tivo to do is pretty much what Replay did. And it killed them.

    These are dangerous waters.

    1. Re:That was the Replay strategy by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Replay was a me-too product, in the public's eyes. It was the Creative Nomad, whereas TiVo is the "iPod". TiVo is already in the popular lexicon. Brand name can keep them around.

      In theory.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:That was the Replay strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replay got to market just before or just after TiVo (depending how you define being "first").

      Replay wasn't "me too"; it just wasn't as good as TiVo.

  56. Hardware innovation & software supremacy by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tivo needs (needed?) to not view its hardware as a mere commodity to be given away, but instead as a platform for innovation in and of itself. I'd consider buying a new Tivo if they did something else more interesting, such as allow for storage expansion via Firewire, DVD burners via Firewire, fast ethernet connectivity, etc.

    That there has been no compelling reason for a geek to buy new Tivo hardware since I bought my standalone S2 in 2002 is pretty shameful (I don't have DirecTV, so HDDirecTivo isn't an option). It's super shameful that they won't have a CableCard HDTivo until 2006.

    Dunno if a hardware move would help now, but hurrying along the CableCard-enabled HD Tivo would sure help.

    Tivo also needs to keep their software moving forward; why not an IMDB tie-in (and hence, Amazon) to the details of a show on now playing? Leverage IMDB & broadband to provide me more show info. Use Amazon to generate DVD sales and comissions. This might sound too commercial, but it could be done at least as tastefully as the ads on the main menu.

    And add a "geek" mode where we can have access to greater preferences and more recorder control (logical and/or searhces, 'don't ever record', on and on...)

    Tivo spends too much time BSing around with features not core to the experience (Tivo2Go, HMO).

  57. Here's an idea: sell the software by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    TiVo should just get out of the hardware business completely. They've never done very well at it -- their product isn't terribly reliable, and they've never been able to figure out a way to sell it for more than it costs to make it.

    Besides, it isn't the hardware that makes people loyal TiVo users. I mean, anybody can slap together a digital video recorder. What gets people excited is the clever stuff the software. Not the obvious stuff, like "record every episode of Days of Our Lives" -- that's only slightly more sophisticated than what a VCR does. It's the really clever stuff. Like "they keep watching nature shows, so I'm going to record them without being told, if I have the spare disk space."

    You license that software to other PVR makers. And you let anybody willing to pay $10/month subscribe to the data stream. Fewer expenses, just as much money. And no stupid cable/satellite companies saying "take out that feature or we won't pay you a pittance to resell your boxes."

    1. Re:Here's an idea: sell the software by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      TiVo should just get out of the hardware business completely. They've never done very well at it -- their product isn't terribly reliable

      It is the reliability that has really sold me. It's one of those "It just works" products. No glitches, no crashes, even handles power failures gracefully.

    2. Re:Here's an idea: sell the software by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I had two Tivo units (a series-2 40 hour box and the pioneer elite unit with the 120-hour drive) Both of them had the absolute best user interface in any technology product that I've ever seen.

      But it was about $20 a month for the two boxes, plus the cost of programming itself. Ouch.

      When the local cable co came out with hi-def PVR's for four bucks a month (over the price of a regular box)... I cancelled my Tivo service. Interface isn't nearly as pretty, and the program guide isn't as slick, and the remote is not nearly as good as the best-remote-ever "peanut" that Tivo had. But I can record two shows at the same time - even in hi-def, and watch a third. It never screws up a channel change, and if it breaks, I tell them to come replace it at no charge to me.

      Tivo tried to sell a box when it should have sold software and design.

  58. Re:P2P streaming will replace the PVR concept anyw by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    Just wait until broadcasters join the chorus of RIAA whiners...

    I'm betting that's already starting. I get a lot of my TV shows off from bit-torrent, and lately there's been all sorts of problems with sites like tvtorrents.tv (was net), tonight there's a problem with btefnet. Luckily someone is staying ahead of whatever is causing the problems, but it's getting kind of silly having to log into irc to find out what site you need to go to each night for a torrent.

  59. The Force, of course by slumpy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Om Malik writes..."

    Sweet, Jedi have begun infiltrating our newspapers!

    --
    http://www.commaecho.com
  60. Amiga by glrotate · · Score: 1

    I have to take issue with the claim that such technology, concepts, and products are not enough for a successful business

    Exactly. Why else would we all be reading /. on our Amiga 10000's?

  61. Dish by Razzak · · Score: 1

    Having used Dish Network's PVR, it's a POS. PLEASE Tivo, license your software and do what you do best, making a good UI. Don't try to control the game, you've already lost.

  62. How? by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Tivo units will continue to function in their current state for years to come

    How is your Tivo going to update its program schedule if Tivo corp doesn't answer the phone?

    1. Re:How? by HeelToe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are TiVo Service Emulators. They put a TiVo program delivery service on your local lan via apache + some modules or custom web applications. I'm guessing this is done via a filtering firewall so you can redirect requests to TiVo from your TiVo box to the local service.

      I believe there are two groups out there doing this - one in Canada and one in Australia. I'm told they currently will not open their code to folks in the US because they want TiVo to stay around and make more units.

      I assume if TiVo goes defunct, this code might become available.

  63. Why not port MythTV or Freevo to TiVo Hardware? by John_McKee · · Score: 1

    Sorry if this is a stupid question, but is there any technical reason you couldn't port MythTV or Freevo TiVo Series II hardware? It's already Linux based, so shouldn't there at least be binary drivers hardware that would be accessable to a third-party application?

  64. TiVo's Savior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the comcast deal dead, Tivo seems a perfect acquisition target for AOL. Yeah, popup ads on Tivo!

  65. ReplayTV SO kicks Tivo's Ass by nontrivial · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When Tivo first came out I wanted one, but being a hacker I decided to build my own. I played around with my own stuff (glorified cron), MythTV, etc for three years. Then ReplayTV went TU and I got one cheap with a lifetime subscription. I haven't paid a penny since I bought it. It's the best money I ever spent. The service is awesome, the interface even my parents can figure out. At first it was a bit flaky, but I haven't had it crap out on me in over a year. I don't watch broadcast television anymore, having to sit through a commercial drives me insane, and there is always something good to watch whenever I want. I don't have to rush home or plan my life around when something is on, and I get to watch a lot of good stuff I wouldn't have otherwise because it comes on in the middle of the night. Plus, it is so awesome to be able to pause something when nature calls or the telephone rings. Besides the interface, which is simpler but not quite as powerful as Tivo's, is it's connectivity. It comes with a telephone and LAN connection, and the protocols have been reverse engineered so that it is simple to store, view, or serve video on a networked computer or computers. Both Tivo and ReplayTV allows you to convert to and from thier formats, but unlike Tivo it is an extremely simple, point and click, all commercials removed, burn directly to DVD affair.

    So I repeat, ReplayTV soooooo kicks Tivo's ass.

    --
    http://james.nontrivial.org
  66. Re:Too Bad, I was looking fwd to Tivo w/ cable tun by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
    Interest you mentioned MythTV. I was thinking the same thing and started googling for info on someone having hacked a Tivo and running Myth on it.

    Didn't see anything (though I didn't try very hard) but one or two mailing list postings about if it was done already or not. I saw one speculating it would be difficult, perhaps, due to the low clockspeed ppc CPU Tivo uses and the 16 MB RAM.

    I'm wondering if we won't see a lot more work for Myth on ppc in the near future.

    The killer thing with Tivo imho is the interface and the remote. The underlying code for the interface would be a great addition to MythTV.

    I'd bet you're right though, they'll go bankrupt and someone (Comcast? Microsoft?) will probably buy up their assets for the trademark and shelve it... or worse, put in more DRM and market it under the Tivo trade name. I don't know which would be worse.

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  67. I said SOFTWARE, asshat. by solios · · Score: 1

    Of which you can find bucketloads for cheaper.

  68. But the SERVICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....from TIVO got real bad anyway. I used to have one, and the service was great for the first few years. Then all the sudden they changed thigs around and their service started to suck. At first their customer support reps were great, the company was really happy to please the customer, and catored to the hacker community. I blew up my own box playing around and they fixed it for free, even told me what I did wrong and why it didn't work. Then about a year ago the modem died, and this time I was met with terrible customer support and terrible service. I sent the box in and payed something like $50, waited a month and a half and got the box back. The modem worked but now the VHF/UHF coax ports were dead. I called them up and told them this, and found out they had lost my records so they couldn't confirm that whoever repaired it busted it because they had no record of me sending it in. I just used the RCA outputs untill the modem died again a month later. Called and found out it would cost me over $300 to have it fixed this time, and got explanation why the price skyrocketed from the last repair. The place I would have sent it to was the same location as the last time and everything, not like they used a different outsourced repair shop or anything. I have hated TIVO ever since.

    1. Re:But the SERVICE by tha_mink · · Score: 1

      ....from TIVO got real bad anyway. I used to have one, and the service was great for the first few years. Then all the sudden they changed thigs around and their service started to suck. At first their customer support reps were great, the company was really happy to please the customer, and catored to the hacker community. I blew up my own box playing around and they fixed it for free, even told me what I did wrong and why it didn't work. Then about a year ago the modem died, and this time I was met with terrible customer support and terrible service. I sent the box in and payed something like $50, waited a month and a half and got the box back. The modem worked but now the VHF/UHF coax ports were dead. I called them up and told them this, and found out they had lost my records so they couldn't confirm that whoever repaired it busted it because they had no record of me sending it in. I just used the RCA outputs untill the modem died again a month later. Called and found out it would cost me over $300 to have it fixed this time, and got explanation why the price skyrocketed from the last repair. The place I would have sent it to was the same location as the last time and everything, not like they used a different outsourced repair shop or anything. I have hated TIVO ever since.

      Two words. Wireless USB.

      Network the TIVO and then you don't need the modem. Plus, a new TiVo series 2 is only $99 so it's barely worth the UPS and downtime to send it back no?

      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    2. Re:But the SERVICE by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they use a system of ranking on your records - if you've already 'claimed' your service then your record will be flagged as 'hes cost us too much money already' and the computer will give the customer rep a new excuse every time you call. Lost records is a new one, but kinda insulting. America needs a data protection act so you can call them up and say 'give me a copy of all my records and any memos you have ever written about me'

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:But the SERVICE by Abreu · · Score: 1

      America needs a data protection act so you can call them up and say 'give me a copy of all my records and any memos you have ever written about me'

      Being an ex-call center employee, I can confidently tell you don't want to know what customer reps think about you!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:But the SERVICE by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Lol. Good point. When I was a tech-support goon, we had a stated policy of reviewing all our teams written communications traffic. As CRM admin, it was my job to reedit unprofessional comments in the case history, just so this sort of thing never came back to bite me in the ass...

      After 3 years, turns out the developers were much worse at insulting customers than we ever were...

  69. Crap TIVO units must have drained them badly by stuartkahler · · Score: 2, Informative

    [DirecTivo subscriber]
    My impression has been that the TIVO boxes are rather poorly constructed. I've had intermitten color problems (screen goes to black and white) with all three of my DirecTivo units, and one completely died in the year since I first jumped onto the TIVO bandwagon. I've heard alot about overheating problems and modem issues from other users as well. I imagine if they're selling the boxes at a loss of over $100 each. The service plans run $80 at Best Buy, which is a dumb buy relative to the price of the box. So almost every unit that breaks down means that they eat a fat loss when the customer buys a replacement unit. The dumbest part is that the warranty is only 90 days labor, 1 year parts. The labor is by far the most expensive portion ($90 minimum, plus shipping costs each way), so the customer is disinclined to even try to get the unit repaired after the first 3 months.

    It's not the comcast deal that kills them, it's the money spent on replacing shoddy equipment.

    1. Re:Crap TIVO units must have drained them badly by larryj · · Score: 1

      I've had problems with the DirecTiVo boxes, but not the stand-alone boxes.

      TiVos that I've owned since '99:

      2 stand-alones, no problems.

      4 DirecTiVos: 1 HD, 2 older boxes, 1 new R10. The 2 older boxes had hard drive issues, the R10 is 1 week old (give it time) and the HD TiVo died this past weekend.

      Hardly a large sample size, but I've owned more TiVos than most people. :)

      --
      What if the Hokey-Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:Crap TIVO units must have drained them badly by macmouse · · Score: 1

      I've had the oposite. I got a standalone tivo, and it wouldn't boot just after 3 months. Called support, because it was more then 3 months had to pay to get it repaired ($99?). Second unit came in the mail. It worked for about a week and it then died. Finnaly, the third unit came in and it seemed to work allright.

      Also, this was the biggest model at the time - the 80GB model. Paid bucks deluxe for it.

      FYI - Also had to pay full price for a new unit ($300?) and they would then refund me after they recieved the broken unit and verified it was really broken.

      Also note that I haven't opened the cases on these at all. No hacks, no nothing. The unit was even on a UPS for petes sake!

      A few months later, I gave up on comcast and switched to directTV. Got their Tivo units, and its worked perfectly out of the box. Like two weeks in, I went and upgraded the disk from 40GB to 120GB. A month or so later, got a second tivo for upstairs. They both have been rock solid, with no problems.

      So I guess it really is your milage my vary ;)

  70. Doing myth on the cheap by dcgaber · · Score: 1

    This is what I spent. I am only counting what is in there right now, and not things that have since been upgraded:

    Case: $40
    CPU/Mobo: $5
    120 gig HD: $60 (after rebate, cheaper now)
    256 Meg Ram $50 (did not look around hard)
    pvr-350 $170
    RS 3-1 remote $5

    total -------$430

    This mobo was a special from tigerdirect that was a via cpu called 1.2 but actually 900 mhz integrated onto a syntax board. It is bargain basement, and one should spend more here. If I had to do it over again, or an upgrade, I will get a better mobo and cpu with integrated spdif out.

    But right now, I have full tivo like functionality with over 100 gigs of space to store. I do not pay monthly fees and probably put way too much time in it. If I spend a little more and get a better mobo and chip, I can do a lot more like watch dvds and mpeg-4 plus play the mythgames. There is some stuff I can do right I can't with a stock tivo (web based recordings, music, rss feeds, weather), and if I upgrade it, stuff I couldn't do even with a hacked tivo (play all those other formats). I have a dvd-burner lying around that I will throw in there, and then I can burn off recordings for archival purpose.

    HOWEVER, do not do myth expecting to save money or time, you will do neither. Do myth b/c you want to learn more about linux, b/c you want no restrictions with your dvr, and because you like to create and tinker things like this (which I think applies to most of /.)

  71. RE: Burning DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVDs use a special subset of MPEG2. The problem is that nothing else that uses MPEG2 provides that subset by default. So you must transcode the PVR350 MPEG2 stream into a DVD compatible stream. Try avidemux2 or ffmpeg.

    Mastering DVDs is a pain. I only do it when I want to give a DVD to someone else. For my own use, or for people with more flexible players, it is far easier to just put the files on a DVD-ROM.

    The remote is for watching TV. For everything else, I ssh into the MythTV box from my desktop PC.

  72. Untapped Revenue Sources? by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

    Is it possible that TiVo has yet to tap some revenue sources. I don't know the legal side of things, but can't TiVo start selling "commercials" or spot ads or whatever?

    They already give "Showcases" which probably cost someone some cash. They also allow commercials to have the "Thumbs Up" popup to easily record a new show.

    Once a TiVo box knows your viewing habits, there's no limits to the kinds of adverting it can serve you --- and marketers would be far more interesting in paying TiVo to deliver an ad to a target audience.

    I think it's far too early to start writing the epitaph on TiVo's gravestone.

    --
    -David
    1. Re:Untapped Revenue Sources? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      They've already started doing this with the new Ford Super Duty Pickup. It's got the thumbs up button, probably to watch some extra Showcase content. Since I already want the truck, but don't have the cash for it, I never bothered trying it out. :-) They also have downloaded movie and TV trailers in the past. I would tend to agree with you that it is too early to count Tivo out.

  73. No one has mentioned the VOIP effect by popo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's another little talked about reason why TiVO is losing users fast: "The VOIP effect".

    In a nutshell: TiVO's internal modem doesn't work with most VOIP services.

    Recently I switched over to Vonage. About a week after my Vonage service began I started getting messages on my TiVO telling me I needed to make my "daily call" because my program data had not been updated for a while.

    I checked on the TiVO forums and sure enough there is a problem using TiVO's internal modem with most VOIP services. There are dozens of supposed workarounds but the success rate for these workarounds is apparently grim.

    Series I TiVO users are truly screwed. Series II TiVO users can wire an Ethernet cable to the back of their TiVO to get listings via IP. But even TiVO acknowleges that most TiVO users probably don't have Ethernet cables in their living rooms.

    There are also many hardware fixes I'm looking into. (But soldering a modem to my TiVO motherboard hardly seems like a fix that most people are going to want to deal with).

    The bottom line is this: As VOIP sweeps the nation, its also sweeping TiVO away.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:No one has mentioned the VOIP effect by mkop · · Score: 1

      I had the same issue when I switched to vonage. So forked over $99 to 9thtee.com and got the tivo cache card with network interface. Now it gets update over the network no soldering involved, and buy the looks of it the inside of the tivo needed to be cleaned out anyways. Now I have 512mb cache card a nice little web interface to delete shows and telnet access to the tivo and I can transfer shows to my pc, with a little help from http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/
      I think tibo is great, and if you threaten to leave they will drop the monthly service to 6.95 a month.
      On the subject of tivo2go they are to slow to implement it and have been promising it for far to long I would rather just stick with what I am using right now to transfer shows/burn to dvd and whatever else I want to do with them

    2. Re:No one has mentioned the VOIP effect by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Um Sorry, my Series 1 DTivo uses my Vonage connection just fine. I've had exactly *one* 3-4 day period when it wouldn't connect in over 2 years.

      You have to use the special dialing codes to slow down the dialing but otherwise it works just great.


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    3. Re:No one has mentioned the VOIP effect by entrager · · Score: 2, Informative

      Series 2 TiVos can get all their data via an ethernet connection. I'm guessing that anyonewith VoIP service is capable of connecting their TiVo to their network. I have Vonage and that's exactly what I do.

    4. Re:No one has mentioned the VOIP effect by popo · · Score: 1


      God I wish that were true. I've tried them all. And I've been on dozens of boards where people have similar problems.

      You're one of the lucky ones.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  74. Re:Very True (Comcast's DVR sucks) by obiwan2u · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh gentle lightspawn, you are too nice. Comcast's DVR is so unusable it can only have been designed by corporate marketing people.

    Comcast's DVR has none of the core "I like this program, automatically record it for me next time" features found in Tivo.

    There's no concept of recurring recording of your favorite shows.

    The resolution for the graphics on the program guide is so course only a few lines of channel info fit on the screen at once. And a big chunk of the screen is allocated to horribly low quality ads.

    Yes Comcast was big and stubborn enough to stick it to Tivo, even if that required sticking it to their own customers.

    Can a bunch of us buy Comcast stock and then raise a ruckus at a stockholders meeting?

    Ben in DC
    PublicMailbox at benslade dot.com

    --
    Ben in DC
    "It's the mark of an educated mind to be moved by statistics" Oscar Wilde
  75. Re:Tivo's time to go nuclear... (or learn gravity) by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
    I agree with you. I have a ReplayTV and love it; I recently bought a Tivo for my folks and they love it.

    In fact, I even find some things on the Tivo better than the ReplayTV. (And vice versa, although less of that.)

    However, the one thing that bothers them the most is that, after they do the key sequence to convert the "return to live" button to be "skip ahead 30 seconds", it works for a day or so and then resets itself!

    This is atrocious. Devices once configured should stay configured, otherwise we should save them from the terrible secret of space and push (shove?) the damn thing down the stairs.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  76. well, i have one and i like it by Fezzik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    -shrug-

    I recommend them to everyone i know and everyone i recommend it to buys it and likes it. If they can't make money off a product like that they should fire their entire business and marketing departments. It's like a restaurant that opens, is super busy, and closes 6 months later. That's a sign that somebody didn't think through the business plan. Here's a hint: when you're making up scenarios for that big Excel spreadsheet, and you add up the column for "Staggering Success", and the number at the bottom is still negative, it's time to get a new plan or at least a new spreadsheet.

    --
    The players tried to take the field. The marching band refused to yield...
  77. And you still won't have solved Tivo's problem by tgd · · Score: 1

    Tivo was picked up my bleeding edge gadget people four or five years ago, and pimped to family and friends. Thats what got them where they are today. And the hardware they sell today has marginal capabilities beyond the original stuff.

    I'm on my fourth Tivo now, and won't likely buy another. Why? For the same reason MythTV isn't an option -- integration. Because neither solution supports CableCard, or integrates with the cable system, neither Tivo nor MythTV can view the vast majority of my channels without a kludgey solution of using a cable box or two, hopefully with serial control but most likely with clumsy IR blasters. And I still can't use any of the OnDemand services. And most important, no HD.

    Tivo acts like they're a cutting edge technology company, but they're not selling technology that bleeding edge gadget geeks want. Hell, they barely sell technology that my parents would want. They have Tivo, and love it, but I know as soon as they find out they can get a PVR from the cable company and actually make use of the 60" HDTV they've got, they'll dump it in a heartbeat.

    1. Re:And you still won't have solved Tivo's problem by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      TiVo has HD models for Direct TV. You can most likely thank your cable company for why they don't have HD for cable.

    2. Re:And you still won't have solved Tivo's problem by tgd · · Score: 1

      Why? My cable company doesn't make PVRs, Tivo does. Unless satellite, which is a closed access system, cable has existing standards. Tivo could've released an OTA HD PVR years ago. They could've released a CableCard unit a year ago.

      They've done neither. Blaming the cable company is silly.

  78. nit picking by raygundan · · Score: 1

    It's true that they haven't done anything innovative in a while, but I've had a tivo since 1.x, and they have definitely done good things since then. The first tivo I had didn't even have the ability to rank season passes for a good six months.

    I'm hoping they last long enough to get that dual-tuner cablecard PVR out the door-- if not, it's looking more and more like all the other PVR companies are going to finally be usable tivo replacements.

    1. Re:nit picking by uradu · · Score: 1

      There are viable alternatives to TiVo nowadays. I think TiVo and Replay did the really hard work of proving that the concept really works and creating mindshare for time shifting, and I thank them for that. At the time it pretty much required hardware for real-time encoding, so the entry point for open source or free projects was pretty high. But now that the concept has been proven, and CPU power is high enough to encode purely in software, alternatives are mushrooming. MythTV seems to work quite well, and even though installing it can be quite a pain (that they will have to address sooner or later if they want to get a lot more popular), that's a one-time thing.

  79. But if you use existing hardware by psyon1 · · Score: 1

    When is it cheaper to build a MythTV or whatever other open source setup on pc hardware vs. a $70 Tivo box? $70 for a dedicated box which you couldn't come close to building yourself. For the cost of a PC w/tuner and say mythtv, that would equal a tivo and 2 years worth of subscription to equal out in costs. Not the mention the time to manage that pc with viruses, spyware and whatever else.

    I am building a MythTV box from misc parts I have scrapped from various systems. So far my cost is $0. I dont have to manage a PC with spyware, virii, and other malware, MythTV runs on linux. I almost chose to use XP MCE so my kid could run some games on it also, but I found working with WINE would be less of a hassle than reinstalling the OS on a monthly basis.

  80. TiVo in the shark tank by Shad0wVypr · · Score: 1

    Blew it with comcast? Maybe Comcast smelled blood in the waters and rather than being swallowed whole on the spot, the wounded fish despirately evaded the snapping jaws.

  81. Re:Exploding TVs? by Magnetic_Monopole · · Score: 1

    I thought it was just the Penguins on top that exploded?

  82. Who owns TiVo and Directv? by kulakovich · · Score: 1


    Therein lies the answer...

    kulakovich

  83. Hint of bad news from DirecTV by netringer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Today's little "It's time to Rethink TV" email message from DirecTV seems to hint that the new "100 hour DirecTV DVR" is not going to be a TiVo. Too bad.
    ...From a new state-of-the-art DVR, to award-winning customer satisfaction, to unique customer programs designed to enhance your overall experience, DIRECTV's spirit of innovation is all about rethinking the possibilities and rethinking what's next.

    New 100-hour DVR with more interactive capabilities, available mid-2005
    I know the "new features" like the new 6 in 1 mix channels will not be worth giving up the TiVo user interface.

    Note to DirecTV: I only subscribe to DirecTV FOR TIVO. If you dump Tivo, I'll dump DirecTV. Probably like Best Buy you figured in losing the "small amount" of geek business and you don't care. You should figure in how much business we brought by word of mouth and being tech mentors to our friends (yes, we DO have friends). We'll take THOSE with us, too.

    If you subscribe to DirecTV join me and tell DirecTV not to dump TiVo.

    If DirecTV screws it up, we'll get into the TiVo saving and Myth TV setup business.

    Let's hope the new TiVo CEO sucks in his pride a makes a deal with Comcast and DirecTV to make the "new" DVRs TiVo DVRs.

    Otherwise, it won't be the first time that a superior product disappeared due to market, business, and political pressures, - see BetaMax, CP/M 86, Word Perfect, Lotus 1-2-3, ....
    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:Hint of bad news from DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a hint. It's a fact.

      News Corp, who owns DirecTV, also owns a company called NDS. NDS already makes a tivo-like DVR for News Corp's UK version, BSkyB.

      For relatively little money, DirecTV is having NDS reroll the software.

      It's always more economical for a company to shuffle money from subsidiary to subsidiary, rather than pay a cash licensing fee to a third party.

      I can't say I blame them.

      Much more detail on this available at tivocommunity.com or satelliteguys.us.

  84. Don't be so negative. by Adapt+or+Die · · Score: 1

    Instead, read the press release.

  85. We got ours for Xmas.... by Electric+Eye · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And we love it. Even my wife, who was way too skeptical and thought I'd watch too much TV, can't get enough of it. It really makes our TV viewing more enjoyable, even given teh fact that we can pause something (live), shut the TV off, have a peaceful dinner and they still be able to watch something in its entirety. We can also watch what we want to watch, when we want to watch it. Have some free time when I get home? Three episodes of Overhaulin' is waiting for me. We can watch "24" commercial-free if we want.

    It is pretty obvious the CEO is an ego-maniac in the form of the original Steve Jobs. He's making the same mistakes, basically. Thinking they can go it alone is akin to signing a suicide note. This idiot blew it time and time again and now me and thousands of others may end up with a worthless hunk of junk and a wasted $500.

  86. Comcast DVR interface is absolutely horrible. by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    I have a new Comcast Motorola HDTV/DVR and although the specs look nice, the TV Guide interface that it uses is the worst piece of sh** I have ever seen. Awful use of screen real estate, bad look and feel, terrible responsiveness, yuck all around.

    The TiVo interface, meanwhile, is astonishingly great... When I didn't find a TiVo option anywhere that took advantage of HDTV and worked with Comcast (i.e., "the consumer has lost"), I knew that TiVo had fucked up something on the business side. (Whenever the consumer loses, it seems like it's always some headstrong engineer's fault who doesn't want to negotiate away his precious technology.)

    I can't believe all the /.'ers here who are bagging on TiVo. What the hell is wrong with you people. Don't you SEE? Are you interface-blind, the same way some are color-blind? Figures that you CL jockeys are not really UI types or appreciators, except for the occasional Apple whoring (which would never have even started until Apple included a command line and X11 compatibility in its new OS). Bah...

  87. Why I have a Comcast DVR and not Tivo by Jonathan+Kliman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I currently subscribe to the Comcast DVR service.

    Why?

    I never used a TiVo and had no interest in one as I have had 2 VCR's for a long time. Recording programming to a hard drive was a nifty concept but not something I would be willing to sink time or money into.

    I signed up for Comcast DVR so I could time shift HD and dolby digital sound encoded programming. Now some people may be in over the air range of network HD stations but I am not. Additionally I have HBO, Cinemax, Showtime and Starz in HD and all of that is only available through my cable box. Since any TiVo type solution will receive the analog video/audio signal from the box that was not an acceptable solution.

    This is why (in my opinion anyhow) the Comcast-Tivo thing will be a disaster for Tivo. The Motorolla box I use is OK, but it has some issues. However ... I don't mind since this is the only way I can record HD/DD5.1 content.

  88. Patents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were first to market with the digital PVR, billions of dollars passed through their hands, and they didn't bother to get patents?

  89. Lifetime subscription was a bargain by McSpew · · Score: 1

    All the more if they offer a "lifetime" subscription where you pay up front.

    I bought my first TiVo about five years ago. I started out using the "ten day trial" they offered back then. It took me three days to realize you could have my TiVo when you pried it from my cold, dead fingers. I bought the lifetime subscription, which, at that time, was $199. Monthly service at the time cost $10. I figured my ROI would take two years tops, even accounting for the time-value-of-money issue. This was before the monthly service went to $13 a month.

    So I've owned a TiVo box for five years, with fully-paid service. By going with the lifetime option, I've saved over $500, because the monthly service went to $13 a month before my original two year ROI period.

    Say what you will about the value of a TiVo lifetime subscription if you buy one today, but for us early adopters, lifetime service was a bargain and a half.

  90. Just got TiVo! by mchenrytl · · Score: 1

    All I have to say is I just got TiVo for Christmas and I love it. I'm paying month by month just to try it out, but plan to do a lifetime subscription around March if I'm still using it (which I'm sure I will). It's great fun and I love that I can now watch all the stuff I usually mis due to being asleep like Adult Swim on Cartoon Network or Bob Vila at 5am. I think what will be telling is how TiVo's Christmas was. Their financial year ends Jan 31, so then the truth will be known. Looking at their financials however, they are brining it over 10 million a month from subscription related activities, so that can't be all bad. Also, who has time to putz around making their own DVR when you can go out and buy TiVo and you're done. I have mine hooked up to my wireless network and it's great that I can share music and pictures from my desktop to it. Also, the front lights up. That's just plain cool. Who wants to have some beige box they built themselves next to their stereo. Plus I agree with others I don't think the GUI of TiVo can be beat. -Troy

  91. VOIP penetration? by pjc50 · · Score: 1

    What percentage of the US is using VOIP now? 0.5%? I can't see this as being a huge problem, at least not compared to the "competition" and "losing money on hardware" problems.

    1. Re:VOIP penetration? by popo · · Score: 1

      The question isn't as you said "what percentage of the US is using VOIP". That's irrelevant.

      The question is: "what percentage of *TiVO users* are switching to VOIP"? ...That's a number that has terrifying ramifications for TiVO.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  92. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  93. Just 23 months.... by DeanOh · · Score: 1

    ...is all I need them to last. That will be the point at which my most recent "lifetime" (of the product) service activation will have cost less than the continuing $12/month monthly rate. Presumably I can scavange the hard drives of they go completely toes up:-)

  94. Tivo QA or lack thereof... by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1
    I don't think so sucker. (apology to BA Baracus of A-Team)


    System failures after software updates....not so much.


    Anytime you deal with a consumer product with intent for massive deployment (i.e. DSL modem, Wireless Access Point router, cable [modem|set-top] box), test group's foremost priority is failsafe.



    One dead-box or firmware vulnerability incident (impacting MANY MORE end-units) would be considered ultimately unacceptable and have been known to threaten the reputation of that company's entire product line, not to mention that company's reputation and financial bottomline.



    Unfortunately, QA is not "the" highly recognized or reverent profession that it should be, ESPECIALLY when consumer product is being used for and by the uninitiated, untrained, and illiterate end-users. As for management not leaning on QA to protect their product line, I defer to Clubber Lang, "I pity the fool.")



    Shut up, Fool Buck up. Don't be a crud. Be an engineer that we all espoused to be. Attain the "Right Stuff."

  95. REPLAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with second rate?