Slashdot Mirror


New Intel Trademark Filed

jmanforever writes "Reuters is reporting that 'Intel Inside VIIV' and 'Intel VIIV' were filed as U.S. trademarks. The question is, what does VIIV mean? Could this be the Roman numerals for 6-4 indicating a 64-bit chip, or could this be the Roman numeral five twice, separated by two lines, indicating the dual cores of the Pentium 5 chip?"

390 comments

  1. Pentium 6 by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or maybe it's Pentium 6, performs like a Pentium 4? Similar to AMD XP1800+ is 1.5GHz but performs like a 1.8GHz Pentium.

    Or maybe it's Pentium M2, after the success of Pentium M series. VIIV = upside down M with a II in the middle.

    Or maybe it's Penitum 5 Dual Core? "Pentium V, 2 Inside"

    Or maybe it's just a marketing stunt? Similar to Google's trademark application "Google R2D2".

    1. SBC Might Buy AT&T
    2. Google Planning Web Browser?
    3. Slashdot Considers Can-Dupe Act

    See the trend?

    1. Re:Pentium 6 by spac3manspiff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's Intel Inside VIIV' and 'Intel VIIV' with AMD inside.

    2. Re:Pentium 6 by Altizar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they are just really bored and decided to get a trade mark on something really stupid to see how the press would react.

    3. Re:Pentium 6 by de1orean · · Score: 4, Funny

      clearly, it's

      \m/

      or

      PENTIUM R0x0RZZZZ!!!!11oneone

    4. Re:Pentium 6 by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Right. It is pronounced:

      PENT-ium VEEV

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    5. Re:Pentium 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot. Speculative News for Nerds. Stuff that may matter in the future.

    6. Re:Pentium 6 by Fred_A · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously, Intel has branched into editors and will soon be releasing vi v. 4

      This suggests that AMD uses Emacs.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    7. Re:Pentium 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a new technology where the processor use 7 V.

    8. Re:Pentium 6 by timeflux · · Score: 5, Funny

      VIIV, ie, viiv, is a valid word [pronounced as veev] in turkish and it means "sucks".

    9. Re:Pentium 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or could this mean Intel doesn't understand how Roman numerals work?

    10. Re:Pentium 6 by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or maybe Intel and Trent Reznor are trying to boost their popularity with a cross marketing campaign, and they really meant to trademark Pentium /VIV\

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    11. Re:Pentium 6 by Saiyine · · Score: 2, Funny

      will soon be releasing vi v. 4

      Do you mean viviv ?

      --
      Hosting 20G hd, 1Tb bw! ssh $7.95
    12. Re:Pentium 6 by Chr0n0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe its broken down (V)(I)(IV)? Pentium 5 GHz, single-core, 4 MB L2 Cache? w00t!

    13. Re:Pentium 6 by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      But there is no Athlon 64 21.2. But maybe AMD engineers stay sane using the Emacs Shrink? Anyway, I'm off to play a game of Emacs Snake.

      Is it your plans that make you say that?

    14. Re:Pentium 6 by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's the Pentium VIIV, Lucy Carmichael's wacky neighbor. Remember the one where they got locked in the Northbridge with Mr. Memory?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    15. Re:Pentium 6 by tetromino · · Score: 5, Funny

      This suggests that AMD uses Emacs.

      Good thing those new Opterons are almost fast enough to run it...

    16. Re:Pentium 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be /VI /V ?

    17. Re:Pentium 6 by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Don't listen to much Nine Inch Nails, eh?

      Or play Quake I, apparently...

    18. Re:Pentium 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's a Pentium -2

    19. Re:Pentium 6 by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      dont tell intel, i want to see them try to market that in turkey :)

    20. Re:Pentium 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they also registered (*Y*)

    21. Re:Pentium 6 by sapbasisnerd · · Score: 1

      History repeats itself, when Digital was releasing Alpha, Alpha was the internal code name, the official name was going to be ARA, an acronymn for advanced risc architecure, IIRC, but shortly before the official launch someone pointed out that ara sounds like an arabic curse word (there were probably other issues but the curse word one was the predominant rumour inside the company) and they had to scramble to come up with a new name as Alpha alone was note trademarkable, they landed on AlphaAXP but eventually the AXP part got dropped.

    22. Re:Pentium 6 by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      VIIV, ie, viiv, is a valid word [pronounced as veev] in turkish and it means "sucks".

      We'll know for certain what their intent was if the CPU cooler looks like a fez.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    23. Re:Pentium 6 by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      AMD XP1800+ is 1.5GHz but performs like a 1.8GHz Pentium

      The PR rating is supposed to be comparative to the Athlon Thunderbird.

      At least thats what I keep gleening from really official sources.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    24. Re:Pentium 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have trademarked

      (oYo)

      but somebody beat me to it =\

    25. Re:Pentium 6 by Acts+of+Attrition · · Score: 1

      It's Pentium 7+5
      as in Intel has 12 months before AMD squashes them in the market.

    26. Re:Pentium 6 by ntufar · · Score: 3, Informative

      > There is no such word in Turkish. Plus Turkish words never start with sound "V". In general sound "vee" is very rare in Turkish. FYI

    27. Re:Pentium 6 by altan · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is not true. The closest word to "veev" would be "ve", which means and.

      Also, Turkish words cannot have two identical vowels next to each other, going on what I remember about 4th Grade in a Turkish school.

    28. Re:Pentium 6 by timeflux · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know, I'm Turkish and I lied about VIIV, but they still suck. [disinformation that makes sense]

    29. Re:Pentium 6 by essreenim · · Score: 1
      Or maybe it's Penitum 5 Dual Core? "Pentium V, 2 Inside"

      It is. Since, AMD announced their dual core architecture, Egypt, the race is on for Intel to deliver their offering.

      I always had a feeling they'd swich back to Roman numerals. They started out Roman:

      Pentium II

      Pentium III

      then, their math got lost went - Pentium 4.

      Pentium V - the redemption?

    30. Re:Pentium 6 by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      No, it's Lucy when she's in trouble.

      Vi-i-i-i-iv!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    31. Re:Pentium 6 by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Let's get Dan Brown on the scene, he will tell us.

      Though I have to say it sure reminds me of the holy grail.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    32. Re:Pentium 6 by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      The line down in the middle of the m clearly being the user's head bent so far down in vomiting that all you can see are their neck and shoulders.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    33. Re:Pentium 6 by thomn8r · · Score: 1
      ... going on what I remember about 4th Grade in a Turkish school.

      Ever been in a Turkish prison?

      Ever see a grown man naked?

  2. pentium 5 by I+r+CommanderCool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if it is pentium 5, it better be 64 bit.

    1. Re:pentium 5 by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they've kept the "Pentium" trademark so long. I mean, Pentium sorta implies the 5th generation, as in 286, 386, 486, Pentium, etc... Shouldn't they have moved to Hexium by now?

      Instead they stick with the Pentium number and keep incrementing a number after it. Either they're too lazy/cheap to come up with another product name, or they have something else in mind.

      At least they didn't call the Opteron the "Pentium Opteron".

      -Z

    2. Re:pentium 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I remember the good old Commodore 64 ...

    3. Re:pentium 5 by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      yeah, I thought they shoulda been at Hexium too... considering their Pentium Pro (and later Celeron) chips were called 80686... They should be at Septium right now, because I b'lieve the P4 core is called 80786... wait, that's not true! look what I found:

      There is no such thing like 80786! The last was 80486, and becouse of legal issues Intel changed its "labels" to PENTIUM class (I remember NEXTGEN was involved).
      My ways of thinking (CAN BE NOT TRUE):
      80586 class = Intel Pentium, or 100% compatibile
      80686 class = Intel Pentium MMX, or 100% compatibile
      80786 class = AA-64 (or AMD64) and EM64T CPU's, or 100% compatibile (hope to be, for now ONLY MY ASSUMPTION)
      this way Intel Pentium II,Intel Pentium III,Intel Pentium 4, AMD K6-2,AMD K6-3,AMD Athlons (in all mutations), some other, not mentioned CPU's, are just 80686 CPUs, with some additional instrucions.
      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    4. Re:pentium 5 by magarity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm surprised they've kept the "Pentium" trademark so long

      That's like saying you're suprised Ford is still using the 'Mustang' name for some cars that have only loosest similarity to the first year Mustang. It's called 'Brand Awareness' and companies spend jillions on marketing campaigns to make consumers want [insert trademarked name here]. The name 'Pentium' is going to be used for as long as Intel can get mileage out of it.

    5. Re:pentium 5 by Compenguin · · Score: 1

      i686 is Pentium Pro not Pentium MMMX. Try running compiling something -march=i686 with gcc and running it on a Pentium MMX.
      Pentium MMX is i586 + MMX
      Pentium Pro is i686
      Pentium II is i686 + MMX

    6. Re:pentium 5 by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Shouldn't they have moved to Hexium by now?

      With the Pentium IV they should have gone through Hexium, Heptium and Octium. They would be planning for the Nonium right now. Coming up would be Decium, Hendecium, Dodecium and Triskaidekium. Considering that, I guess I understand why they just stuck with the Roman numerals.

    7. Re:pentium 5 by Paladin128 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Continuing with your train of thought...

      Pentium III is i686 + MMX + SSE
      Pentium 4 is RISC on crack cocain
      Pentium M is the result of a P4 knocking up a PIII

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    8. Re:pentium 5 by operagost · · Score: 1

      This doesn't make any sense because the P6 core (the one in the Pentium II, Celeron, and Pentium III) has almost nothing in common with the Pentium.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:pentium 5 by InvalidError · · Score: 2, Informative

      But really, the "proper" 686 is the Pentium Pro and it is the Pentium Pro's feature set that was used as the foundation for the P2 (basically a P-Pro+MMX) and P3 series.

      What the PPro brought to the table compared to the plain old Pentium was an independent cache bus, an extra execution pipeline, out-of-order execution and a bunch of other tweaks common in other architectures.

    10. Re:pentium 5 by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This really isn't a very good analogy. Maybe if Ford only had two or three models, it'd make some sense.

      Furthermore, the Pentium is obviously based on "pent" for the number 5, since it was the successor to the 486 (which came after the 386 and the 286). Since there's a numerical association, it looks stupid for them to continually reuse it, with more numbers after it. Ford's car names have no numerical associations; they're just names.

      What would you think of Ford's naming if they had called all Mustangs since the 70's the "Mustang II"?

    11. Re:pentium 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who thinks of the number five when they hear the word Pentium? The only thing that I associate with that word is Intel; and I'm sure Intel is quite happy with this fact.

    12. Re:pentium 5 by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, I forgot to point that out... I noticed that the person whose post I'd copied said that MMX was i686, but forgot to address the issue. Thanks!

      (wasn't aware that the original Pentium Pro didn't have MMX extensions tho; seems a little odd...

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    13. Re:pentium 5 by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Considering penta is Greek for five, and I learned this some time in grade school (along with bi, tri, quad, hex, sept, etc.) I'd say anyone who made it through high school should think of this. Did you drop out in 8th grade or something?

    14. Re:pentium 5 by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      marketing never did make sense, brutha. Marketers never bothered having that goal ^_^

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    15. Re:pentium 5 by gibson042 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait, what's this? There, in the title. Could it be Intel's next trademark? I think so! Everyone, gather 'round and welcome... the RePentium!!

      Religious connatations noted and humorously approved.

    16. Re:pentium 5 by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      What would you think of Ford's naming if they had called all Mustangs since the 70's the "Mustang II"?

      They tried it, the market hated it, so they went back to the original name. See "Pentium M".

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    17. Re:pentium 5 by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      "Reuters is reporting that 'Intel Inside VIIV' and 'Intel VIIV' were filed as U.S. trademarks.

      The word Pentium doesn't appear in these trademarks. Has the Pentium come to the end?

      After all, "Pentium 5" would really beg the question why Intel is stuck on "Pent" so long that the 486 must still be in style.

      For continuity generation 6 comes naturally after generation 5. Is that the meaning of "VI"? It's hard to imagine that a simple Roman numeral is used to refer to an entire generation of processors.

      It's possible that "VIIV" refers to the first generation of 64-bit processors, with no explicit link to Pentium

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    18. Re:pentium 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure enough it looks stupid to you, me or any other geek out there, but to anyone else they've probably never even considered the connection, have no idea that 2/3/486 processors existed at some point and as such all they want is a Pentium with the highest number after it.

    19. Re:pentium 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original PPro was a very expensive server processor (big caches and stuff). Wasn't much SIMD to be done in that domain, at least not the brain-damaged MMX variety of SIMD...

      (Although PPro was targeted for workstations too, against Alphas and UltraSPARCs, MMX handled only fixed point SIMD, and had a particularly bad register setup, so it was of no benefit in that area either.)

    20. Re:pentium 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure enough it looks stupid to you, me or any other geek out there, but to anyone else they've probably never even considered the connection, have no idea that 2/3/486 processors existed at some point and as such all they want is a Pentium with the highest number after it.


      Dont forget Processors 0 and 1 (8086 and 80186). This number scheme lead to the use of people refering to machines by (P)rocessor revision. ie, i386 was a P3, a i486 was a P4, and a i586 was a P5. Then Intel started naming things Pentium and suddenly we had P-MMX, P-Pro, P-Classic, PII, PIII, and PIV. Can you suddenly imagine the alphabet soup when the AMD, NexGen, Cyrix, and IBM chips with their labeling system using k's, M's and Nx's.

    21. Re:pentium 5 by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that AMD has a similar line of numbers, they just call it K:
      K6 (K6-2, K6-3; for variations of their 686)
      K7 (Athlon, Athlon XP)
      K8 (Athlon64)

      And for anyone out there that might put Celeron and Duron in the list, they are relative lines- Celeron goes as far back as Pentium 2, and up to Pentium 4. They are nothing more than scaled-back, budget versions of their major line.

    22. Re:pentium 5 by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      And whenever you think of Google, do you think of a 1 followed by 100 zeroes? I learned that a googol is that number, and pronounced the same (only recently noticed they were spelled differently), yet I only think of the search engine (etc) when I think of Google.

      Pay attention, and just notice how many things are loaded with greek prefixes/suffixes, yet you didn't notice them before because it was just a name, not a word that needed analyzed.

  3. Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's LXIV for 64.

    1. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by CyberBill · · Score: 1

      VIIV... VI = 6 IV = 4 VIIV = 64 C'mon, seriously?

      --
      -Bill
    2. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey tard knocker,

      VI IV
      is 6 4
      Just like he said.

      I pity the foo who don't know roman numerals.

    3. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morons making me reply to my own topic...

      Roman numerals go like this:

      I = 1
      V = 5
      X = 10
      L = 50

      Add smaller numbers in front and subtract smaller numbers from behind.

      LXIV = 50 + 10 + (5 - 1) = 64

      I'm am not a tard bot. I am a 1337 Latin scholar.

    4. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Hey tard knocker,

      VI IV
      is 6 4
      Just like he said.

      I pity the foo who don't know roman numerals.
      Hey, according to the same logic, it could also be 7 5
      or 5 2 5
      or 5 1 4

      ... but it can't be any of those, including 6 4, because that's not how roman numerals are composed. VIIV is nonsense as a roman numeral.

    5. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you fucking idiot. Marketing doesn't care about proper Roman numerals.

      Look, VI = 6. IV = 4. We KNOW VIIV != 64. However, VIIV looks a lot cooler than LXIV (or so marketing might believe). And it's not very difficult to interpret VIIV as 64, despite your 1337ness.

    6. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurray! My first flame war on Slashdot. Let me put on my asbestos underwear. Ok here goes.

      Roman numerals aren't contructed that way. VIIV would mean 5 + 1 + (5 - 1) = 10. The proper way to write 10 is X in Roman numerals. Also, the most likely place where someone is to learn Roman numerals to this degree is in a Latin class. And do you know why, mister name caller? The language the Romans spoke was Latin! Yes, indeed.

    7. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Informative

      ... but it can't be any of those, including 6 4, because that's not how roman numerals are composed. VIIV is nonsense as a roman numeral.

      And that is why they'd be able to trademark it. Can't trademark a number IIRC, which is why they opted for the Pentium name instead of 586. If it were actual Roman numerals, it would be a number and untrademarkable. Since it is nonsence, they can trademark it.

      Sound like an explanatio to anybody else?

    8. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      How do you know it's not 525?
      or 5115? or 75? or 514?

      Marketing might not care about Roman numerals, but enough ordinary people in the world actually DO know enough roman numerals to know that that is crap AND to know that LXIV is 64.
      It's like the stupid virii thing - it's not an alternative, it's WRONG.

      They might as well call it the Pentium sicks-T-for
      Afterall, it's not difficult to interpret that as 64.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    9. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, stop writing like Yoda.
      Second, there are II types of people,
      those that understand Roman numerals and
      those whom do not.

    10. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdotters are idiots. Is "Pentium" a word? Yes, and no. Is "VIIV" a Roman Numeral? Yes, and no. Is this somehow unclear?

    11. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I dunno. To me, LXIV looks like Roman Numerals for 64, and VIIV just looks stupid.

    12. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by moody · · Score: 1

      I guess if you HAD to read it literally it would probably be 10.

      LXIX (a legit Roman numeral) would be 69 (50 + 10 + (10 - 1 [e.g. 9]))

      By the same logic:

      VIIV would be (5 + 1 + (5 - 1 [e.g. 4])) or 10.

      However it's a lot simpler an a great deal more standard to put X if you want 10 so I'd have to agree it's some clever marketing gimmick that won't stand up to much logical scrutiny.

    13. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't Latin. It's Roman numerals.

      I guess the Romans didn't speak Latin.

      And I'm pretty sure you understand how "VI IV" can mean "64," and you're just being a fucktard.

      No it can't. VIIV is a violation of the rule. VI IV could mean SixFour but not sixty four. Romans didn't have a base 10 system.

    14. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and no.

    15. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VIIV is a bad construct. You would be marked down if it were a response in school.

      I want to read it as 53.

      V + (II - V) = 8
      5 + (2 - 5) = 8

      VI [space] IV is 6 and 4

    16. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean?

    17. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by tomhudson · · Score: 0
      which is why they opted for the Pentium name instead of 586
      ... doesn't that make the 80686 (686) a sextium? http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:iDBjcqXuk5YJ: www.dansdata.com/sextium.htm+sextium&hl=en
    18. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since it is nonsence, they can trademark it.

      Speaking of nonsense, you better get that one to the USPTO while you still have the chance.

    19. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds reasonable, but what about the clothing company 686 ? Its entirely numbers, yet surely they have the power to enforce their brand name.

    20. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      But they could still trademark "Intel 64" and "Intel Inside 64", so what would be the point of the silly pseudo-Roman numerals?

      I think they could also trademark a sufficiently unusual style of writing "64".

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    21. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by cnettel · · Score: 1
      It's Greek, and the T comes from Penta, so it would reasonably only be hexium.

      I know, the only thing worse than a bad joke is a serious explanation of why it's bad.

    22. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      True. Whatever it is, if VIIV is supposed to stand for 64, then it looks like Intel's history of math bugs has extended beyond the chips and into marketing.

    23. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by thejuggler · · Score: 1

      LXIV is the proper Roman Numeral for 64. But most of the mindless masses wouldn't know that.

    24. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you're saying that the romans didn't understand the difference between who and whom either?

    25. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by pdabbadabba · · Score: 1

      And VIIV looks cooler. Thats worth a lot to a company like Intel.

    26. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucktard.

    27. Re:Learn you Roman numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Douchebag.

  4. What I want to know is... by Khakionion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why do we do all of this Apple rumormongering? I mean, really, with all of these stories about Apple making the front page, you'd think Slashdot was totally astroturfing on Apple, and completely ignoring making ridiculous conjectures about companies like Intel... ...oh wait.

    --
    OMG! Wau!
  5. Or could it be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Intel's finally breached the barrier and will be releasing a 75-bit processor?

    1. Re:Or could it be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naah! 525-bit processor.

      Either that or Intel are inside Viv...

    2. Re:Or could it be . . . by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ... or a 6-bit pentium 4 ('cuz it will run cooler with fewer bits).

      It's probably for a quad-core p6.

    3. Re:Or could it be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be LXXV?

    4. Re:Or could it be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, it would, but the grandparent was poking fun at the idea that VIIV - VI IV would be 64, but suggesting that it could by VII V instead.

    5. Re:Or could it be . . . by jd · · Score: 1

      No, it's a dual core. They just put one on backwards.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Or could it be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be Pentium 5115 MHz processor that runs 64-bit OS at 525 degrees F with a bus speed of 75 MHz

    7. Re:Or could it be . . . by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Intel's finally breached the barrier and will be releasing a 75-bit processor?

      Or just something that runs as hot as one.

    8. Re:Or could it be . . . by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Intel's finally breached the barrier and will be releasing a 75-bit processor?

      No, you're reading it wrong. What actually happened is Intel's people just forgot their roman numerals.

      VIIV is meant to be V IIV or really, V III as in 8. The next Pentium chip will be an attempt to play on the nostalgia of aging nerds everywhere by releasing an 8-bit processor.

    9. Re:Or could it be . . . by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      Thats it...
      Remember how Intell was going to create a new rating for speed?
      Well here it is folks... They are mesuring speed by the heat it generates.

      AMD won't be able to beat Intells new 75 degree processor....

      No need to paint flames on this sucker.....

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    10. Re:Or could it be . . . by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      They are mesuring speed by the heat it generates.

      Their next processor will be called the "Intel Kelvin" :-)

  6. Intel Patented 64-bit and Dual Cores? by Master+Bait · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or did they patent a process where they do it all with mayonaisse, mustard and pickles?

    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
    1. Re:Intel Patented 64-bit and Dual Cores? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they were out of ideas and decided to trade mark a new trademark. Set their brwosers to slashdot and plan to pick the best 4-6 ideas.

    2. Re:Intel Patented 64-bit and Dual Cores? by c666hellchild · · Score: 1

      Finally then they would have a least one good use. (well, I dunno... never cooked mayo, mustard, and pickles)

      --
      -Peace
    3. Re:Intel Patented 64-bit and Dual Cores? by John+Pliskin · · Score: 1

      Head over to a Quiznos, they toast their subs; although the pickle is put on after cooking.

      Warm mayo....it's strange, but it tastes so good.

      $

  7. Spelled wrong by mboverload · · Score: 5, Funny

    They just spelled "Viva la AMD" wrong.

  8. I'm betting on by Performaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pentium 525. Dunno why, but it just sounds right.

    --

    I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    1. Re:I'm betting on by quanticle · · Score: 0

      Pentium 525. Dunno why, but it just sounds right.

      So, are Pentiums like BMWs now?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    2. Re:I'm betting on by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

      Only thing is... 525 in roman numerals is DXXV.

    3. Re:I'm betting on by schtum · · Score: 1

      Holy cow, we have a winner! Or maybe not, those articles are almost a year old.

    4. Re:I'm betting on by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Only thing is... 525 in roman numerals is DXXV.

      Yeah, but no one is going to buy a computer called "diiickkks-vee"...lol. Intel dicks-vee inside...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:I'm betting on by quanticle · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, I thought I was making an original comment...

      BTW, where is this new naming scheme? Has it been scrapped? I've certainly never seen/heard of this before...

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    6. Re:I'm betting on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell have you been? All of the LGA 775 (Socket T) processors are given model numbers from 505 to 570. Its been this way for like a year. You just lost your geek license!

    7. Re:I'm betting on by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Would that be the heat output?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:I'm betting on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, which is why he said it anyway... VIIV is wrong too. It's a joke man, loosen your tie.

    9. Re:I'm betting on by Performaman · · Score: 1

      No, it's your electric bill after using this thing for a day.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  9. Obvious: it's pornographic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    \/ \/

    ||

    1. Re:Obvious: it's pornographic! by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      \/ \/ ||
      You've a sick mind

    2. Re:Obvious: it's pornographic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VIIV

      So it a pearl necklace, is it?

  10. My first thoughts by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    six, four. Hmm I wonder if it's for a 64 bit chip.

    I didn't think about the 5 II 5 interpretation, and I doubt the market who needs to know "intel inside" would understand the symbol either way.

    1. Re:My first thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its seven, five, retard.

    2. Re:My first thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it's just another palindromic sequence of characters with no meaning what so ever.

    3. Re:My first thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And apparently you couldnt tell a sarcastic comment from the hole in your ass.

  11. Roman Numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    64 would be LXIV, not VIIV.

    Then again, once Marketing gets ahold of something, all logic goes out the window.

    1. Re:Roman Numerals by Samari711 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet the Romans are going to be pissed about this...

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    2. Re:Roman Numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      yes the Intelites are going to be crucified.

    3. Re:Roman Numerals by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Damn right we are.

      (Disclaimer: I have never lived in Rome, but my ancestors ruled parts of it).

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    4. Re:Roman Numerals by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

      No, since the number was computed by that new Intel chip, VIIV really means 64 (hint: think of the Pentium bug).

    5. Re:Roman Numerals by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Centurion: What's this thing? "Intel Inside VIIV"?
      Marketing guy: It... it says "Intel Inside 64".
      Centurion: No it doesn't. What are the roman numerals for 64 ?
      Marketing guy hesitates
      Centurion: Come on, come on!
      Marketing guy: (uncertain) "XXXXXXIV?".
      Centurion: What's the largest numeral smaller than 64?
      Marketing guy: "Fifty?".
      Centurion: Numeral for fifty is?
      Marketing guy: "L".
      Centurion: (takes legal forms from Marketing guy and writes over) "LXIII".

  12. VIIV = 2x P4's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    VI...IV - see, it's mirrored, hence 2 P4's.

    It's probably not designed to be pronouced numerically, just as "Viv" or similar (Veev?).

    If Slashdot was running on a dual core P4, it'd have to be known as /..\ or something.

    1. Re:VIIV = 2x P4's... by magarity · · Score: 1

      VI...IV - see, it's mirrored, hence 2 P4's.

      Mirrored? As in the second one does the reverse of the first? Or mirrored as in RAID-0 where both do the same thing at the same time?

      No, I think it's much more likely that it's a Pentium 6 with a Pentium 4 co-processor.

    2. Re:VIIV = 2x P4's... by Malc · · Score: 1

      Two Pentium 4's make a Pentium 8, right? V = 5; IIV = 3; therefore VIIV = 8. It's version inflation: they're jumping 6 and 7. Simple innit?

  13. Or Both? by vbdrummer0 · · Score: 0

    Most likely, it's both. Intel would be incredibly dumb to put out a new processor that wasn't 64-bit, considering where the market's heading. I think the VIIV is a clever piece of work, personally. (Although I'm more the G4/G5 type)

  14. LXIV by supersuckers · · Score: 0

    I am going to quick patent LXIV just in case...

    1. Re:LXIV by UnixRawks · · Score: 0

      patent^H^H^H^H^H^H^Htrademark. VIIV = 64. Pentium 64 to be exact

      --
      I
    2. Re:LXIV by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down!

    3. Re:LXIV by daveo0331 · · Score: 1

      And in 2030, you'll be able to sue the NFL for millions!

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    4. Re:LXIV by VStrider · · Score: 1

      yep, LXIV = 64 for the uninitiated, I=1, V=5, L=50, C=100, D=500, M=1000

      --
      VStrider.
  15. In other news today by digitalgimpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Intel also registred:

    MMDCL

    which is the roman numeral for the temperature their new chip will run.

    1. Re:In other news today by owlstead · · Score: 1

      2650 degrees kelvin? Are they going to produce some kind of metal?

    2. Re:In other news today by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      2650 degrees kelvin? Are they going to produce some kind of metal?

      Tungston?

      OTOH... 2650 F will melt gold but not platinum.

      So much for gold contacts on the chips. They will have to use platinum or tungston....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:In other news today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, but AMD runs way hotter than Intel.

    4. Re:In other news today by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Funny, my Athlon 64 3400+ is currently 102F compared to my friend's P4 3.0ghz at ~900F

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:In other news today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my Athlon 64 3400+ is currently 102F compared to my friend's P4 3.0ghz at ~900F

      That's nothing, my Cyrix M-processor hits 1100F no problem.

    6. Re:In other news today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should upgrade to the M-II, it's like having the sun inside your computer.

    7. Re:In other news today by toddestan · · Score: 1

      For your homework, I suggest that you compare the Prescott to the AMD64, and see which one runs hotter. The AMD is hotter business dates back to the Slot-A Athlons vs. the PIII.

    8. Re:In other news today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it need solaris ?

    9. Re:In other news today by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't they go ahead and trademark the phrase

      "Hotter than nine hells

      too?

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
  16. stackable design? by LiquidMind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The Pentium V is likely to fly along at between 5GHz to 7GHz, have 2MB plus of level two cache, be built on a 90 nanometer process, and have a stackable design." (Source, and another)

    does anyone know what they mean by stackable design?
    is this supposed to be taken literally? stacking one CPU on top of the other?
    or just some buzzwords that mean nothing that this implies?

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    1. Re:stackable design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can easily store them in a stack on your desk. Then, when one burns up from running at a ridiculous clock speed, you can just take the next one off the stack, plug it in, and keep moving.

    2. Re:stackable design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...what they mean by stackable design?

      Oh I would guess something like a stack of player cards.

    3. Re:stackable design? by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

      Well, there is RAM that is stackable and the slightly different chip packages literally sit one on top of the other. This would be hard to implement with processors because of heat, although the articles indicate that a heat sink designed for the purpose may exist, high localized power requirements, and I imagine problems with PCB design (especially if the motherboards are still 4 layer), layout and mechanics.

      Sounds a little off the wall to me, but then so does the suggestion that the chips will "fly along" at anything near 5-7GHz. I seem to recall that when the P4 was released, Intel was saying it would rapidly scale to 10GHz. Instead, the P4 rapidly hit a brick wall and its scaling became process dependent, which it still is.

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    4. Re:stackable design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it has something to do with putting multiple cores on a chip? Designing the core so that no internal changes are necessary when combining 2, 4, or 8 cores on the same chip? (Pure speculation I'm afraid.)

    5. Re:stackable design? by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I believe that this refers to the ability to "stack" the cores together, that is create multicore chips. Sure there are supposed to be multicore P4s and Pentium Ms, but they are "hacked" together, not optomized for it. AMD's Opteron, on the other hand, has been designed for it from the start.

      That's my guess. Literally stacking cores not only would have terrible heat problems, but how do you deal with all those pins? 478 per core (the Pentium V will probably use even more than that) is 956 pins. But you would have to have a socket for those dual core chips, and another seperate socket for the single core chips. Complicated. Either that or you'd have to use 956 pin sockets for ALL chips and just not use half the pins. Again, complicated.

      Natural dual/triple/quad/whatever core is my guess. Not hacked, but designed for it specifically.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:stackable design? by doormat · · Score: 1

      Look at the dates on those articles. They were written long before Intel hit the power/heat wall. The Pentium 5 (aka Tejas) was shitcanned in favor of a Pentium M derivative.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    7. Re:stackable design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cache wafer is stacked on top of the processor wafer. This GREATLY reduces cache latency but creating low loss connections between the wafers is quite non-trival. IBM has been researching this with RPI.edu for a while now but I don't think Intel has been succesful if in fact they are trying to do this.

    8. Re:stackable design? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think dual core Intels will necessarily increase the number of pins. They can both be separate cores on the same bus, much like a Xeon DP system. With the interconnects so close, they don't need to lower the FSB clock to prevent signal issues. A one processor system, the clock can go higher because it acts like a point-to-point bus. A multiprocessor system with multiple processors on the bus is more complicated from a signal transmission line perspective.

    9. Re:stackable design? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      It means Intel is finally dumping the x86 instruction set, and the IA64 instruction set and replacing them with Forth.

      --
      Why not fork?
    10. Re:stackable design? by knapper_tech · · Score: 0

      I think it makes perfect sense. Spread CPU load across two cores to lower energy density, then smack them back together to ensure water-cooled-TEC-equipped pc's are the way of the future.

      --
      "There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." ~ Louis Armstrong
    11. Re:stackable design? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      IIRC, there really were experiments with chips whose instruction set was a simplified Forth. This would have been 15+ years ago, so I guess we can conclude they didn't work out so well.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    12. Re:stackable design? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I believe that this refers to the ability to "stack" the cores together...

      I think Intel might be partnering with old fart HP calculator engineers and going back to Reverse Polish Notation. No, wait...Carly would never allow that. Free* printers for all!

    13. Re:stackable design? by pjbass · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure there are supposed to be multicore P4s and Pentium Ms, but they are "hacked" together, not optimized for it. AMD's Opteron, on the other hand, has been designed for it from the start.

      I can't argue the fact (and won't) that AMD designed their Opteron for dual-core from its inception, due to the memory controller, and today's P4's and PM's are not. However, you really should read up on the Cedar Mill and Smithfield platforms that Intel has announced. Sure the first dual-core procs they'll release will be two Prescotts welded together (presumably by running them next to each other...), but the true "dual-core" procs they intend to sell are designed from the beginning to be dual-core. I've seen one of the Cedar Mill processors running in the debug lab, and trust me, it's running much faster than the current procs, plus it's dual-core, and it consumes less overall power than today's single proc (think 5 GHz, dual-core, ~90 watts, vs. 3.6 GHz PSC, ~110 watts) and does not suffer from the memory bus starvation that the Xeon's currently die from. Intel has their designs right for their dual-core line.

    14. Re:stackable design? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Maybe it just means that warehouse fees went up and they are looking for a better solution than arranging all the ready to ship CPUs on the floor.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  17. Hallelujah! It's been released at last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vi version 4! I have been waiting so long for this moment, I can tell you!

  18. CVVC by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Honda Inside.

    Now known as the Civic.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:CVVC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      actually it was CVCC

    2. Re:CVVC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These new chips go only into Lexus.

    3. Re:CVVC by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      and furthermore, CVCC = "105 cubic centimetres"

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:CVVC by herc_mk2 · · Score: 1

      So if the Honda CVVC became the Honda Civic, then I guess the Intel VIIV would become... the Intel Viiiv?

    5. Re:CVVC by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      and furthermore, CVCC = "105 cubic centimetres"

      While I stand corrected on CVCC... the CVCC had a 1500cc engine. 105cc would be be decent for a moped or small motorcycle but wouldn't power anything car sized.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:CVVC by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was thinking of Citröen's 2CV. (Deux Chevaux, "Two Horse")

      CVCC = Controlled Vortex Combustion Chamber.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    7. Re:CVVC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if the Honda CVVC became the Honda Civic, then I guess the Intel VIIV would become... the Intel Viiiv?

      Vicciv

  19. Slashdot's new tag line by BigWhiteGuy_27 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot - Speculation for Nerds. Stuff that Might Be.

    1. Re:Slashdot's new tag line by 1lus10n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot - Speculation about things that were posted before. Nerds bitching about stuff.

      Slashdot - Now we are running low on stories. Someone post something quick !

      Slashdot - Not really news. Might be someday.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  20. numerology by cratermoon · · Score: 1

    VIIV
    VII = 7 V = 5
    75
    7+5 = 12
    1+2 = 3
    75 is 3 * 25
    5 is 2+3
    VIIV is 525
    quod erat demonstrandum, ubi sub ubi

    1. Re:numerology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Semper ubi sub-ubi" -(heard from Ed Quinn (RIP), best darned teacher I ever had) :

      SEMPER Fi(delis): "ALWAYS Faithful" (USMC)

      UBI [WHERE] (interrog. and relat)... -Notre Dame University online Latin dictinary

      SUB: below, UNDER.

    2. Re:numerology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - quod erat demonstrandum, ubi sub ubi -

      semper ubi sub ubi

    3. Re:numerology by Malc · · Score: 1

      But doesn't VIIV == IIX?

  21. Reminds me by geneing · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Somehow this reminds me about another trademark "Pentax *ist" (a bunch of digital cameras). It's way too silly to pronounce that ("May I see that Pentax starist camera please...")

    The official explanation is that '*' can stand for anything you consider your are (like artist).

    1. Re:Reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that these are the same fucks who busted out the "O-O-O-O-OPTIO!!!!!" commercials, I'd wager that they hired the same guy who routinely suggests Chinese products be labeled with terrible English-language names such as "Homo Sausage."

    2. Re:Reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so I can go into a store and say

      "May I see that Pentax pr0nist camera please"

      W00t!

    3. Re:Reminds me by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      I've come across several fellow photographers that came up with an appropriate pronunciation for such a fishy product name: "Starkist". Which just serves Pentax right for trying to be so pretentious if you ask me...

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Reminds me by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      It's way too silly to pronounce that ("May I see that Pentax starist camera please...")

      If you read the Japanese pages, it's pronounced isuto, which is a Japanese way of pronouncing "ist" using their syllables. The * is silent.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    5. Re:Reminds me by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      I think you would be more satisfied with a Canon. With automatic exposure. Why not go for the motor drive?

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    6. Re:Reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That name is as silly as naming a web site /.

    7. Re:Reminds me by thegnu · · Score: 1

      The official explanation is that '*' can stand for anything you consider your are (like artist).

      I can see the advertisement now...

      "I really couldn't find a camera that was cooler than the camera that black guy in my community college comp class had, and he kept showing off, and I DIN'T NO WHATTA DO!"

      *walks into Circuit City*
      "Hey, it's a Pentax Racist!"

      Ching. CHIIIING... I guess you just what ah needed!

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    8. Re:Reminds me by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Asteriskist.

      --
      What?
    9. Re:Reminds me by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      So Hen3ry sas been promoted to marketing, now has he?

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    10. Re:Reminds me by pNutz · · Score: 1

      For a second I thought they were allowing wildcards in trademarks. I guess someone would have trademarked '*' by now.

      --
      Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
    11. Re:Reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I though the '*' was to hide a 'P'.

  22. Pentium 8?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last timed i check VIIV was roman numeral 8...

    1. Re:Pentium 8?? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0, Redundant

      IIV != 3
      III = 3
      IV = 4
      V = 5

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Pentium 8?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8 = VIII
      VIIV = nonsense

    3. Re:Pentium 8?? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Erm no? VIII is 8, VIIV makes absolutely no sense as a Roman Numeral.

      I - 1
      II - 2
      III - 3
      IV - 4
      V - 5
      VI - 6
      VII - 7
      VIII - 8
      IX - 9
      X - 10

      see here

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Pentium 8?? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "VIIV makes absolutely no sense as a Roman Numeral."

      Not as *a* Roman numeral, but as a group of numerals.

      In fact, it could be several.

      5 1 1 5
      5 2 5
      5 1 4
      6 4
      7 5

      I pick 6 4

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  23. Re:Pentium 64 by Roofus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dude, you just got modded up for regurgitating the write up! Apparently the mods don't even read that much before clicking away....

  24. Re:Pentium 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for providing the valuable service of summarizing the 1 paragraph article summary. Your insightfulness will really save me time.

    Retard.

  25. gross conjecture by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The question is, what does VIIV mean? Could this be the Roman numerals for 6-4 indicating a 64-bit chip, or could this be the Roman numeral five twice, separated by two lines, indicating the dual cores of the Pentium 5 chip?"

    After this and this I'm forced to the conclusion that these three stories are three points on a grid forming a triangle corresponding with the location of Atlantis. Could it mean Slashdot editors are from another planet? Could it mean open source is to the renaissance as ancient greece is to atlantis?

  26. Errrr... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I'm sure thinking "VIIV" == "64" is neat and all, but isn't sixty-four LXIV?

    I know, I know--doesn't look as symmetrical or "cool". Doesn't Intel look dumb enough these days without putting together nonsensical combinations of letters for marketing purposes and trying to pass it off as intellectually hip or something?

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:Errrr... by rewt66 · · Score: 1

      Well, we mocked them when they picked the name "Pentium", too...

    2. Re:Errrr... by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 1

      You're right. This should obviously have been the iVIIV

  27. Re:Pentium 64 by R33MSpec · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Thanks for establishing this for the 60th time.

  28. Re:Pentium 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wizard: Yes, but since V minus I is 4 couldn't it also mean V minus VII is -2 Townspeople(confused): uh, yeah all right. Wizard: And what is the absolute value of -2 Townspeople(confused, scratching heads): uh, hmm... King Arthur: A duce!

  29. Dunno but by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

    I don't know but the two potential explanations offered by the poster are pretty smart. Congrats.

    1. Re:Dunno but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're his gimp, aren't you?

  30. intel Trademarks by HHumbert · · Score: 1

    Does Intel still hold a trademark on lower case "i"? When I first saw that (maybe in the mid 80s), I didn't realize that much worse was to come in the whole trademark / patent / copyright area.

    1. Re:intel Trademarks by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 3, Funny

      iDoubt iT. iAm thinking iMac, iPod, iTunes. iThink iTs a different company

    2. Re:intel Trademarks by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Actually, Intel possibly did, once. Since "80386," as a number, was ruled not trademarkable, the next processor was officially the "i486(TM)". 486 was, of course, still a number, so I(TM)ntel must have had the trademark on the letter i(TM).

    3. Re:intel Trademarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so I(TM)ntel must have had the trademark on the letter i(TM)

      I doubt it... you can't have a trademark on a number alone, but once you stick the i on the front, it's not a number (no jokes about -1^0.5 thanks). it just happens to contain a number. So they had a trademark on the use of "i486", not "i". Otherwise they would write i(tm)486.

    4. Re:intel Trademarks by fbjon · · Score: 1

      No, I think the trademark was for "i486" which is not a number.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:intel Trademarks by HHumbert · · Score: 1

      The Intel site now lists, among other copyrights, "i386" and "i486". The "i" trademark information I recall was from some time before the introduction of the 80386: it may have been on the notes inside the cover of "The 8086 Book".

    6. Re:intel Trademarks by Detritus · · Score: 1

      They had a bunch of stuff that used the prefix "iAPX", at least in the data books they gave to engineers.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  31. Well it sucks by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't stick something like that on my dog, that trademark is garbage.

    No way they'll really use that.

    1. Re:Well it sucks by JesusQuintana · · Score: 1

      I agree. It seems like a company of Intel's stature could come up with something more clever than this. I don't think this would ever make it past a focus group.

      Of course, this entire discussion has become free market research for Intel.

      --
      You said it man. Nobody f#%ks with the Jesus.
  32. Re:Not so Funny: Trademark Theft in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back.

    Under.

    The.

    Bridge.

    Troll.

  33. Maybe you should read it like GNU by Fortran+IV · · Score: 4, Funny

    VIIV -> "V Isn't IV" -> "Pentium 5 Isn't Pentium 4"

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    1. Re:Maybe you should read it like GNU by photon_chac · · Score: 2, Funny

      got to be "VIIV Isn't IV" meaning "we've got this something that's definitely not P4"

      --
      KOS-MOS
  34. Wrong notation by crush · · Score: 0, Redundant
    If it's Roman Classical numerals then it's got to be either:
    • LXIV
    • LXIIII
    1. Re:Wrong notation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a point, LXIV would not be recognized as a valid number. It uses a notation that was invented during the middle ages and leads to ambiguous numbers.

      LXIIII is Roman.

    2. Re:Wrong notation by crush · · Score: 1

      Just a point of _sourced_ information: the Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd Edition) says that the "additive" (LXIIII) and "subtractive" (LXIV) are used in the Roman Period sometimes with both versions in the same document, but the additive was preferred in official inscriptions. So the subtractive is _not_ a mediaeval innovation.

  35. Intel sucks by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, it's a picture of a vampire's front teeth! Intel has been taken over by the biters!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  36. Re:Pentium 64 by st3v · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    you're welcome

  37. Re:numerology, Yes, but..... by Guy+G · · Score: 1

    If V=P I=O then you have POOP !

  38. They're teeth, stupid by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

    It's perfectly clear that VIIV represents a row of teeth, of which the two outer ones are sharp fangs and the middle one is missing. That makes perfect sense for a company like Intel: vicious on the outside but kind of a hillbilly in the middle. Floating point errors, anyone?

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
  39. Conspiracy theories abound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing you know, http://www.nglpa.org/ will get a topic posted. SHEESH!

  40. Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, maybe this is a stupid thought, but could Intel VI IV be just Intel 64?

    You know, since most people don't know what an L is in roman numerals, VIIV looks better than LXIV and PR people are always trying to be "cute".

  41. Perhaps... by natron+2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It could be a Pentium 5 with Intel Inside

    Example:

    V=5
    II=Intel Inside
    V=5

  42. dummy by gcantallopsr · · Score: 1

    If these are meant to be roman numerals, they're aiming to pretty illiterate people :-P

    --
    Try Ubuntu GNU/Linux, it's great!!!
  43. VIIV pronounced vive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it is supposed to be pronounced vive so it ryhms with five.

    Introducing the new Pentium VIIV, not to be confused with the Pontiac Vibe.

    (When did Pontiac start making vibes anyway?)

  44. I know. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    It's the new Pentium 8 chip! V + IIV = VIII = 8.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  45. umm 8? by Horkdoom · · Score: 1

    V is 5 IIV is 3 (although improper) so perhaps VIIV is 8? Although I think 64 is probably more likely to be the answer.

    1. Re:umm 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint #1: VIII
      Hint #2: You are retarded

    2. Re:umm 8? by Vihai · · Score: 0, Troll

      8 is IIX

    3. Re:umm 8? by X1011 · · Score: 1

      No, it's VIII

    4. Re:umm 8? by SenorMooCow · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But 64 is LXIV (50+10-1+5).

      --
      I run a Debian/Kernel/Knoppix Mirror: (http|ftp|rsync)://debian.ams.sunysb.edu/
      apt-get @ > 5MBps == teh win!
    5. Re:umm 8? by Horkdoom · · Score: 1

      I did say it would be the improper way of making 8 (that is VIII by the way).

    6. Re:umm 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hintus I: Poblvs vil maecum favx shiti e latvs.
      Hintus II: Sentvs ov hvmor.

      (people will make faux shit in latin. SENSE OF HUMOR. who knows what intel is doing?)

      Oh, and, I heard something about how global warming MIGHT be canceling out nuclear winter! Yay!

  46. Intelstein by mrogers · · Score: 1

    I dunno but I've got this image in my head of a wild-eyed man in a white coat standing over a chip with millions of volts coursing through it, shouting "Viiv! Viiiiiiiv!"

  47. VI is the mirror image of IV... by hkfczrqj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's going to be dual core, everybody knows that... So if one core (a "Pentium IV" core) is the mirror image of the other, why don't call the other core "VI muitneP"?? Well, VIIV is much more appealing than "VI muitnePPentium IV" (the first P is supposed to be backwards)...

    I'm thinking too much bull... I should go home.

  48. They're a little late... by Locke2005 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    viiv.com has already been registered...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  49. ...or could it be ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this be the Roman numerals for 6-4 indicating a 64-bit chip, or could this be the Roman numeral five twice, separated by two lines, indicating the dual cores of the Pentium 5 chip?" ...or could this be a slow news day on Slashdot ? :58008:

  50. Perhaps Intel has friends in high places... by Attaturk · · Score: 1


    It's all in the font. It's a dubya can't y'all see that!?

    V\/V

    Please excuse phoney U.S. accent. =D

    1. Re:Perhaps Intel has friends in high places... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's all in the font. It's a dubya can't y'all see that!?

      V\/V


      Would that not be tripya?

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    2. Re:Perhaps Intel has friends in high places... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      That's the catch. You all tripped..

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    3. Re:Perhaps Intel has friends in high places... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fucking retarded.

      Please shoot yourself.

    4. Re:Perhaps Intel has friends in high places... by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      That's a phony Southern U.S. accent you insensitive clod!

      Get your phony U.S. accents straight for once, will you?

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
  51. Stackable Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually they already had such a chip, the "overdrive" if I'm not mistaken. It was just an extra chip you sat under your 486dx, it just clipped together.

  52. Here it is by dedeman · · Score: 1
    Well, with Intel's numbering system, Pentium(s) I, II, III, and IV, perhaps they are trademarking all the roman numerals which apply to their pentium processors

    Pentium I (duh), Pentium II (also duh), Pentium IIV (well, technically it's wrong), Pentium IV (again, duh), they all use I and V. Maybe a Pentium V as well?

  53. 5 [parallel sign] 5 by azpcox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's simply their multiple core pentium 5.

    Don't get hung up on the Roman Numerals.

    --
    What exactly do you mean by "Don't touch this button?"
  54. What can it mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think supposedly(dispite my lack of an account) that it could be a Pentium 5 based off of some of the pentium 3 highpoints. This is jus my 2 cents. I don't know if it's because i run a P3 still. heh

  55. No, no, it is meant to be read on its side! by wernst · · Score: 1
    Sure, it may LOOK like VIIV, but you aren't considering what such a label would look like tipped over:

    It could be:

    <
    =
    <

    or

    >
    =
    >

    Meaning, obviously, that this new Intel product is Less Than, Equal to, and Less Than

    or

    this new Intel Product is Greater Than, Equal To, and Greater Than

    I think when we realize that it is being compared to AMD offerings, the orientation of the new trademark is obvious...

  56. MMX by siliconjunkie · · Score: 3, Funny

    They patented "MMX" as well. Perhaps they have something planned for 2010?

    1. Re:MMX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn the difference between trademarks and patents please, retard

    2. Re:MMX by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      I know the difference and mis-typed. Learn some manners in communicating with people over the net, mister AC.

    3. Re:MMX by Bri3D · · Score: 2

      What are you talking about? This is not about patents but trademarks. And MMX has been in Intel processors since the P2MMX, so it can't be delay wither.

    4. Re:MMX by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, I realize I said "Patented". I meant to say "Trademarked". Sorry for the confusion. Next. my post was meant to be taken lightly with a bit of humor. I, of course, *do* realize that "MMX" technology has been available since the P2MMX. You see, "M" and "X" are also both roman numerals. When you put them together it equates to 2010 (1000+1000+10).

      You see, I was pointing out that just because Intel trademarked a series of letters that happened to correspond to roman numerals does not mean that they inteneded the Roman numeral usage.

    5. Re:MMX by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      (The next person who flames this guy for using "patented" instead of "trademarked": I better not catch you ever misplacing a comma. Because you're quibbling about things as important. Everyone knows what he meant - as demonstrated by the fact that you're flaming him, not acting confused - so where's the problem?)

      Back on topic: MMX is MultiMedia eXtensions. Is there a nice expansion for VIIV? As mentioned earlier, "II" could be Intel Inside, but the two Vs can't stand for much....

    6. Re:MMX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMX came before the P2 did.

    7. Re:MMX by Ogerman · · Score: 1

      heh.. Speaking of MMX, did anyone ever figure out what that *really* stood for? I mean..

      Matrix Math eXtensions
      MultiMedia eXtensions .. or perhaps something more creative like:
      Massive Marketing eXperiment
      Masks Moore's eXtenuation

      And if I recall correctly, the official Intel answer was something along the lines of "it doesn't mean anything.. it's just a name." Right.... (:

    8. Re:MMX by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      All those replies, a funny mod, and no one actually comments on your idea...
      VIIV as an instruction set extension seems like a decent guess- it lends itself to a few buzzwords (video, value, internet, illegal...) and wouldn't be a core product for them. (maybe not 2010, but that's a minor detail)

      IMHO, the whole roman numeral thing seems to be a red herring.

  57. Maybe they read this RFC by TimmyDee · · Score: 1
    --
    Per Square Mile, a blog about density
  58. Roman numerals aren't positional... by curious.corn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    VIIV isn't VI(6E1)+IV(4E0). that's totally wrong. Romans used different letters to distinguish 1 (I), 5 (V), 10 (X), 50 (L), 100 (C), 500 (D), 1000 (M) You get magnitude relatives to the letter by subtracting (prefixing) or adding (postfixing) the preceding magnitude unit: 1 (I), 10(X), 100 (C) up to 3 symbols. That's a rough description mind you as this rule takes an exception on the 5* symbols which can't repeat (they're a sort of calculating cornerstone). Yeah it sucks, one wonders how they could get along commerce, taxes and precise civil engineering calculations with this method. So, an intel 64 should read "intel LXIV"... if they really intend to pursue this nomenclature we'll have a glorious laugh over here. (I'm typing from less than 1 mile away from the Appia Antica)

    --
    Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    1. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by PepeGSay · · Score: 1

      Ummm.... I think you may have missed the tongues squarely planted in 99% of these posters cheeks... think "humor" and reread the posts. :)

    2. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You get the "No Shit Sherlock" award for the day. Thanks, retard!

    3. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Further, Roman numerals were simply a notation system for describing abacus tallies. It generally sucks to do math with Roman numerals unless you're doing it on an abacus, where it makes perfect sense.
      (The upper row, above the bar, on an abacus stands for fives, the lower rows for units (or 50 and tens, 500 and hundreds, etc.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by AJWM · · Score: 3, Funny

      I meant to add:

      So, given the above, the new Intel trademark stands for a chip that's about as good as a broken abacus.

      --
      -- Alastair
    5. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by ckolar · · Score: 2, Informative

      But you are not thinking like Roman. The numbers make sense if you remember that they would have used an abacus for calculations -- so IV would mean de-incriment the ones column and increment the fives. Here is a nice site that talks a bit about the business aspects.

    6. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by mat.h · · Score: 1

      one wonders how they could get along commerce, taxes and precise civil engineering calculations with this method

      I'm not an expert in the history of calculating machines, but my first guess would be "abacus".

    7. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      So, an intel 64 should read "intel LXIV"

      Which, as others have pointed out, would make it an actual number, and so render it incapable of being trademarked. VIIV, being nonsense, can be trademarked.

      [HIBT? HIL?]

    8. Re:Roman numerals aren't positional... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Oh, those Sales folks could bedevil the devil itself! Question, what's wrong with "intel bidibi-bodibi-bu"? ;-)

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  59. It's 1337 for hang ten by mefcon1 · · Score: 1

    It's Intel's version of \m/ But I think they're taking the Internet "surfing" metaphor too far.

  60. It's the Pentium 64. But... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...they wrote a routine to convert binary to Roman but unfortunately they used a floating point divide on one of their own CPUs and for some reason the letters came out funny...

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:It's the Pentium 64. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats funny, for a retard.

    2. Re:It's the Pentium 64. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Floating point jokes are sooooo 1995.

  61. either ... or ... by algae · · Score: 1
    Could this be the Roman numerals for 6-4 indicating a 64-bit chip, or could this be the Roman numeral five twice, separated by two lines, indicating the dual cores of the Pentium 5 chip?

    Yes.

    --
    Causation can cause correlation
  62. It's 801286, a Startrek 25th anniversary reference by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    VII+V=12
    Spock: "A vintage 801286 of the mid 21st century. A fine museum piece."

    Animated Screenshot

  63. Symbology by dunng808 · · Score: 1
    I find it odd that "Pentium" combines the sacred feminin five (pentagram) with a Latin suffix usually used with neuter nouns. The de-sexed female. How sad, and yet so very American.


    Obviously this caught the attention of some rather clever people, who have succeeded in finding positions of influence in Intel and whos goal is to restore women to their rightful place. Thus, the new logo


    VIIV


    is two women holding hands. For Intel's next offering I expect we will see


    VXV


    A new view of SMP, no?

    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project

    1. Re:Symbology by magarity · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      the sacred feminin five ... How sad, and yet so very American.

      Whot's American, not beeing abel to speel corectly?

    2. Re:Symbology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody just got finished reading the DaVinci Code...

    3. Re:Symbology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe, just maybe, call me crazy if you will... they took the prefix for five (pent/penta, where do you think pentagon, pentagram, etc, comes from anyway?) and added the Latin neuter suffix.

      Pent + ium.

      Since, after all, it probably came about so that they could trademark their fifth generation processor name... they couldn't trademark the previous ones because they were numbers, due to which AMD was able to make 486's and market them as such.

  64. Pentium -2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's getting it all wrong. It's going to be a Pentium -2 (negative 2)

  65. USTradeMark Search Results by I-Iillbilly · · Score: 1

    Searched TARR webserver with 2 results for VIIV. They both say the same, heres one result: Serial Number: 78534023

  66. no! It's a davincicodeanistic thingy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actully a Pentium5 (V), but 3-bit processor (IIV).

    Rumour has it they want to break their former record of their hugely succesful 64-bit platform, and sell this specially tailored box-breed to the third world.

    The expected sales to North-Korea alone would be so astonishing, the entire country will see a 300% increase in boxes. With their 5 boxes in total, they would become a major player on the communistic market!

    And the best thing is, the USA has approved the sales, for some unknown reason. The last time it was permitted if they could sell 3-bit puters to a communistic country, it was refused! Amazing how a new wind blows withing the USA government... Which such tolerance, war will be abolished from the world real soon, no doubt!

    It would have shipped much sooner (originally planed for newyear, actually), but at the last minute, it was decided the boxes had to be tsunami-proof. Obviously, this caused some delay.

  67. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I POST

  68. V I IV Diesel by TheGuano · · Score: 1

    It's just intel leaking info that they're getting ready to release a G5-based laptop.

  69. roman numeral mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like x86 ISA still supports BCD, they are adding new roman numeral instructions. (That work incorrectly.)

  70. If it is the Pentium 64... by Dizzle · · Score: 1

    it should be Pentium IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII. That would be cool plus everyone understands it immediately. Is there any confusion as to what this number is? No, there is not.

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    1. Re:If it is the Pentium 64... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, 63? I'm confused.

  71. I'll get to the bottom of this... by amichalo · · Score: 1

    Let me take a stab at the origin of Intel's "VIIV" trademark...

    ...[does Google Search]...

    Oh, no worries, this is just the board of director's retreat. That crazy Intel board, working so hard. Deserves a break.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  72. More like Vyv, as in Vyvyan by cblguy · · Score: 1
    I don't know why, but all of the sudden a bunch of buds in a flat in Britain in the early '80s started storming through my brain when I saw VIIV.

    [Vyvyan talking about his potion] The person who drinks it will become an axe-wielding homicidal maniac, it's a cure really... for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac.

    I loved that show... The Young Ones

    So much for random thoughts for the day...

  73. VIIV = new Intel machine virtualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Intel's name for virtual machine inside a virtual machine.

    (and by the way, I believe it is based on stolen intellectual property)

  74. The marketing division of intel calls VIIV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the bucktoothed vampire who's fun to be with.

  75. It's all about text editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VI Is Vomit.

    Well, that's popular opinion in my head anyway. :)

  76. Dual Core Pentium 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm betting on Pentium 5 being what intel will brand their indivudual cores and the 2 will imply dual cores.
    Kinda like: 5 to 5
    It also gives them room later on to do a Pentium 545 with quad cores.

  77. Probably something trivial like.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VIIV 6th generation pentium 4; which supports 64bit.

    Willamette, Northwood(A),B,C, Prescott(D),E,F(F being the 64bit one)

  78. Paging Ronan Harris... Paging Ronan Harris by Minwee · · Score: 1

    Or maybe what they really want to do is start a new campaign based on the slogan "Intel VNV Nation" and this is just a first step.

    It could happen.

  79. Who now? by Saeger · · Score: 1

    Intel Inside VIIV? Who is VIVian and why is Intel inside her?

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  80. Two Pentium 4s. Here's why... by doormat · · Score: 1

    On the first generation of the dual core chips, they designed one processor core (a prescott with some interconnects between chips), and they mirror one of the cores backwards so that the interconnects line up. Thus VI is IV backwards. It also happens to be 64, thats just some synergy.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  81. v^_^v by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about the II

  82. Re:Learn you Roman numerals (I did and now look!!) by Dan9999 · · Score: 1
    yup, it's true. VI IV is different from VIIV. The latter I think will be reserved for the next incarnation: 75 right??

    Will we finaly have processors that can do roman numeral math? It's about time!!! Finally new technology and no longer is it all about the gigahertz (they must have learnt their lesson).

    Also the pronounciation, is it "Viv"? If so then I wonder if the chip will also have a job in the mornings at the local greacy spoon and finally start paying for some of that electricity bill!!!

    One also wonders (not me though) if the "New" Roman numeral system will be used in which 64 would be represented as IIIIIIXXXXXXX which would look a lot cooler on the top of the processor, way better than VI IV but most importantly is also a very curious set of answers to the next ballot in my area. hmmmm,

  83. tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who freaking cares, i guess today slashdot is a rumor site that likes posting dupes

  84. -1, confused about intellectual "property" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A patent isn't the same thing as a trademark (you're not new here so you should know this by now).

    And MMX was an acronym for Multi-Media eXtensions, back from the days when the marketspeak du jour was computers that were "multi-media systems" (cf the later buzz for "internet ready").

  85. ?? Diamond ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What temp will Diamond take. Ie a Diamond chip with Diamond cooling. They can run hot just cannot recall what temp with the Diamond before explode/melt.(will have to be covered in something so it cannot burn something like spacecraft covering over the hotest points ie the melt increase presure breaking the casing causing rapid burn ie explode.)

    Note diamond is alot cheeper to make than using platinum or Tungston.

    1. Re:?? Diamond ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, 1) Diamond is carbon, it BURNS at 900C just like the charcoal in the bbq behind your trailer 2) You can't spell for shit, can you?

    2. Re:?? Diamond ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ignition temperature of carbon is 500-600C.

  86. It means by amling · · Score: 1

    Intel doesn't understand roman numerals.

    --
    70e808a22cb027cde4a6abddf6435d55
  87. VIIV by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Conclusive proof that Intel's marketing guys are idiots.

    80286 = "286"
    80386 = "386"
    80486 = "486"
    80586 = "Pentium" (faux latin for "Five")
    80686 = "Pentium II" (fault latin + roman numberals for five-two)

    Followed by... (in no particular order)

    Celeron = cheap processor, faux latin for "fast" (based on, well, a whole lot of different actual Pentium chips dumbed down)

    Xenon = Noble gas... Totally inert

    Pentium III

    Pentium 4

    Itanium

    So, duhh... of course the next one is Pentium VIIV

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    1. Re:VIIV by Slothy · · Score: 1

      There is no Intel CPU called the Xenon. There is a family called Xeon though.

    2. Re:VIIV by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Itanium is a letter short of "Titanium", which is a very light and versatile metal, which I'm guessing was Intel's idea of a joke, since the Itanium was one of their big-iron chips. Too bad the whole platform flopped.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:VIIV by bluepuddle · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a Pentium Pro stuck in there too, somewhere (I think) between Pentium and Pentium II ?

  88. 940 pins amd's is built not for Dual Core by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This from Amd is ment to take upto 8 chips Dual Core ie 16 processors.

    I guess Intel can get away with not incearsing pins. But Amd will control the high end market. And 939 chips are just 940 chips without a pin. Ie chips that would not work well with other chips ie rejects from the server world are still perfectly find for home use.

    Basicly Amd is trying only to mantain 2 chip types long term. Ie server class Operion Amd64. Low end Samprom.

    940 have 3 hyperchannels on the motherboard duels have a fourth hyperchannel between the 2 cores. Most 939 boards only have 2 hyperchannels. Please note each hyperchannel is a bus so AMD chips only start swaping the bus after they get past 3 chips ie half current motherboards of AMDs is not used so duel amds will have a bus each in single chip setups.

    Ie one channel is used for controling the use of the bus so there is not crashs single chips don't need to talk to get permission to use a bus.

  89. What? by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Funny
    From TFA:

    Microprocessors, the central chip in computers, are among the most complex products ever produced by humankind, composed of hundreds of millions of microscopic switches that check e-mail and play video games.
    Wow, so there are switches reading my e-mail and playing games when they should be processing? :(
    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  90. Can't live up to the best... by panth0r · · Score: 0

    Being unable to keep up with the competition, Intel released a less powerful, but completely groundbreaking processor, the 53 bit processor, they simply added several multiples of two and came to this conclusion... if we can't keep up to Moore's law, we might as well try our damndest!

    --
    I like suggestions, but I don't like contributing towards them.
  91. When in Rome.... by Daytona89 · · Score: 1

    This is obviously the export only version. In Rome, a re-branded, but functionally identical processor will be available.

  92. Pronounced "Double-U Two" by wasted · · Score: 1

    If, for some reason, Intel was working on a chip that would be labled "W", the next generation of that chip would be W2. A graphic artist may overlay the roman numeral two over the center of the W, so it looked like VIIV.

    Of course, this theory falls to pieces if Intel doesn't actually have a prospective "W" chip.

    1. Re:Pronounced "Double-U Two" by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 1

      W2 = double U two = double U2 = double Bono

      So, W2 is pronounced Bono-Bono.

      --
      No sig today.
  93. Pentium Flivvle by thegnu · · Score: 1

    So, duhh... of course the next one is Pentium VIIV

    Based on your comment, I've decided that the Pentium VIIV should thus forth be pronounced 'Pentium Flivvle'

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  94. New multiprocessor by nns6561 · · Score: 1

    It'll be a new heterogenous multiprocessor. It'll combine two Pentium 5's and two Pentium's on a single chip. You'll need the 2 P5's to satisfy Longhorn, leaving the Pentium's for running your spyware.

    1. Re:New multiprocessor by c666hellchild · · Score: 1

      You forgot the other I in the title, maybe it could be devoted to managing your overtaxed cooling sysem (think.. the first triple power supply system) Wait, better not give Intel more ideas on how to make their power hungry proccesors work.

      --
      -Peace
  95. I knew it all along... by haelduksf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now Intel is admitting it! VI=6 V+I+I+V=12 (6+6) Thus, 666. Obviously. On an ironic sidenote, they will be hot as hell.

  96. It's the way you say it. by the_pimaster · · Score: 1

    V 'eye' V Sounds like five to me.

    1. Re:It's the way you say it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vey oy vey!

  97. It's the pentium vibe! by m00j · · Score: 1

    I think it is pronounced Vii v which sort of sounds like vibe. Hence it is the pentium Vibe Think of the advertising campaigns they can do with it! It also sound a bit like five. So it could be "get the intel inside pentium five vive. The only processor that allows you to do all your media editing and viewing tasks!" I wonder if it is going to speed up the internet, I mean we have not had any update in the speed of that since the Pentium 3 apparently did! :p And for those of you saying why don't they change the Pentium brand name it is very clear. Unless they have a huge problem with it and everyone starts hating it they will keep it. I sell laptops and you would be amazed at the number of people who say to me "I don't want that laptop, it is not a pentium" while they are pointing at a centrino laptop! They should have called it the Intel Pentium Centrino!

  98. Who knows, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it's getting damned close to my initials - /\/\ \/\/

  99. Or Voice To Voice by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Although I believe the VIIV = 64 might be likely. I think it could also be Voice 2 Voice telecommunications chip.

  100. Two handed Vulcan greeting? (nt) by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    (nt)

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  101. VIIV = mammary copulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a woman from the dixie cup 50's.

  102. I thought you couldn't trademark a number by DogsBollocks · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression you couldn't trademark a number, IE thats why Intel started using the word "Pentium" rather than 586. VIIV is a number in Roman Numerals and =10 VI is SIX and IV is FOUR. SIXTY FOUR in Roman numerals would be LXIV. So it looks like some dickhead marketeer thinks VIIV looks clever as 64 but it's actually 10.

    1. Re:I thought you couldn't trademark a number by amnesiaWind · · Score: 1

      no, 10 is X

      VIIV is NOT a valid roman numeral, just a string of characters, therefore trademarkable

      even with your goofy logic i could argue that VIIV is not 6 and 4, but 7 and 5, which is 13 - so maybe we should start reading into _that_ now...

    2. Re:I thought you couldn't trademark a number by DogsBollocks · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that X=10 however,

      According to http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/numbers.html/

      Typing VIIV into the conversion box = 10.

      Makes sense to me, 6+4=10
      But you are almost correct that it could be 7+5=12
      (you had 13, but I see your point)

      Help, now I'm confused....

  103. ViiV by carl0ski · · Score: 1

    How cool will it be if it means P4 core and Dothan Core (P5?) on the same chip which on the fly will determine which Core is most suited to the task at hand and balance the workload more efficiently.

  104. It's been Roman Numerals all along by Namarrgon · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ah, so clearly this is how the progression goes:

    Pentium..........(original)
    Pentium II.......(twice as good)
    Pentium III......(3x as good)
    Pentium IV......(4x as good)
    Pentium M.......(1000x as good)
    Pentium MMX.(2010x as good)

    Apparently the Pentium III-M and IV-M were fairly good chips too.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:It's been Roman Numerals all along by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      'Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?'

      I thought it meant like he wanted to 'en-grave her', i.e. see her to her grave or bury her...

      Morbid, but Elven.

      :-/

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:It's been Roman Numerals all along by Bisqwit · · Score: 1

      Pentium..........(original)
      Pentium II.......(twice as good)
      Pentium III......(3x as good)
      Pentium IV......(4x as good)
      Pentium M.......(1000x as good)
      Pentium MMX.(2010x as good)


      So VIIV = 7 to 5 (7 *-1+ 5) = -2 (-2x as good)?

  105. I figured it out!!!!!!! by c666hellchild · · Score: 1

    Some jackass at Intel was reading /. (instead of tring to make their processor un-suck), took a look at all of us losers with too much time on are hands and decided to give us a really mystery to ponder.

    --
    -Peace
    1. Re:I figured it out!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, seriously? that was lame.

  106. Hope I'm not overstating the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My guess the two II's between the V's stand for "Intel Inside".
    Intel Inside dual Pentium Fives (V's).

  107. Re:numerology, Yes, but..... by c666hellchild · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the cryptography of the new Intel chips names enough. Now they're taunting us with cryptoquips

    --
    -Peace
  108. or may be .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VIIV is actually an acronym signifying the current state of things at Intel.

    VIIV = ..yeah Intel is going nowhere !

    1. Re:or may be .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn html tags...

      VIIV = <-->

  109. It's not a processor at all! It's much worse! by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1
    TSP (Top Secret Penguin) intelligence has just handed me a terrifying report.

    It turns out that Intel is creating an evil mirror universe twin of VI. It will use Clippy's CLI-based cousin VIgor! The editor will be embedded in the processor itself and will constantly offer suggestions whether you're running Windows or Linux. ("I see you've booted your computer, would you like to edit your Quicken folder with VIIV?")

    The implications are mind-boggling. However, all is not lost. This could be the event that finally leads to a cease-fire in the vi-emacs flamewar. Both sides will put aside their differences and unite to stop the spread of the evil VIIV editor! Unite now! Stop VIIV before it edits you!

    And remember: many Bothans died to get this information.

    --
    Anonymous Kev
    Proudly posting as AC since 1997
    (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
  110. Five-by-five? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Willow: "Don't worry, we're sure to spot Faith first. She's like this cleavagey
    slutbomb walking around going, 'Ooh, check me out, I'm wicked cool, I'm five
    by five'. "
    Tara: "Five by five? Five what by five what?"
    Willow: "See, that's the thing. No one knows."

  111. 886 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pentium VIIV

    where V + IIV = VIIV
    5 + 3 = 8

    Pentium (original) was a 586
    Pentium Pro the 686
    Pentium II the 786
    Pentium III the 886
    Pentium IV the 986
    Pentium M a stripped down version of the Pentium IV so it is a 936

    So VIIV is the new 1086 with a two eyes (think 'I's). The question is where did all the other models from Pentium V to VII go?

    All of these roman numbers are making me think about Ceasar and the Ides of March.

  112. Intel DCLXVI by infonography · · Score: 1
    In case you can't count like a proper Roman Citizen or a Medieval Monk. DCLXVI equals 666

    Like those case badges that read Evil Inside

    Props to STEPHANUS GIBBS, SARNIA INSULÆ, don't slam him, here is a google search.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  113. Why 75? by raehl · · Score: 1

    VIIV =

    5115
    525
    514
    53
    615
    64
    75

  114. V 2 V ?? by ThinkPad760 · · Score: 1

    What happens if you think about it interms of e-commerce. It might be V2V. A new e-commerce app their going to throw at us.?? Vehicle 2 Vehicle? Volts 2 Volts? Or with a russian accent... failure 2 fabulous

  115. I don't know why it isn't obvious... by SporkLand · · Score: 1

    ...it is both of the things mentioned in the post.

    VIIV =
    64 bit chip
    with
    2 Cores

    2 P5's and 64 bits...

    Some marketing guy/gal at Intel is hugging himself/herself over this one.

    1. Re:I don't know why it isn't obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VIIV in Roman numerals can never equal 64 ... not even in your wildest dreams. The II before V is ALWAYS subtracted. That's the rule, so it becomes 8, but never will it equal 64 ... not even 6 4.

  116. The Vikings had it worse by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    AFAIK:

    1. Their runes were made to be inscribed on wood. (Hence for example no curved lines. And no horizontal lines, which would be along the fiber and split the wood.)

    2. They had no numerals at all.

    Considering that they did a LOT of trading, seems to me like bookkeeping was a royal pain in the arse. Think about carving on wood something like "Sold two hundred fifty seven furs for one thousand seven hundred sixty eight coins". Sounds to me like an accountant back then needed serious physical condition :P

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  117. You're all wrong. by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 0

    They're obviously talking about a conversation between Kirk and Scotty. Kirk: Scotty, we've got 10 seconds to live and the only thing that can save us is to know the name of the Computer! Scotty: Pentium. Five. I. I. five. Kirk: Of course! The Drunken Captain's Secret Code! Five more shots and the confirmation of them! Plenty of them, infact! "Pentyum Five. Aye-aye, five!" I have the answer, godlike being! GB: Wrong! *Enterprise blows up.*

  118. Numerology has the answer by johannesg · · Score: 1
    "Intel Inside VIIV" let's analyze: V = five, I = one, so VI = six. IV is again six. The word "Intel" has five letters, and if we add the "I" of "inside" we get yet another six! So here it is, incontrovertible proof that Intel is satan!

  119. VIIV? by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1

    Isn't that -2?

  120. Intel's dual core P4 is codenamed Smithfield by ikewillis · · Score: 1
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/14/intel_dual -core/

    VIIV is one of the worst marketing names I can imagine.

  121. Clearly, by TheUz · · Score: 1

    obviously, irrefutably, vampire fangs.

    ()()
    .
    VIIV

    see?

    --
    ^..^
  122. evidence? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    Its hard evidence that one of the world's leading semiconductor companies is run by people whose heads have yet to get a grip with ancient Roman technology.

    Obviously, life in America drives you bonkers. Intel needs to send some of its high-ups to Europe for a holiday, so they can experience reality.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  123. Grab the domain while you can! by PeteDotNu · · Score: 0

    Search Results for domain intel-inside-viiv.org.uk

    Our search indicates that at the present time the domain "intel-inside-viiv.org.uk" is not registered.

    --
    My other processor is big-endian.
  124. Any serious posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean I know this is slashdot where anything about Microsoft and Intel are belittled and mocked, however is there anyone with an I.Q. higher than 50 on here?

    This is why I only visit slashdot once a month.
    Too many mental midgets thinking they can actually use a computer.

  125. "VIIV" as a "container of numerals" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe their plan is to trademark the *word* "VIIV" to get -- in practice -- an exclusive right to the *numerals* V, VI, and VII (which can't be trademarked by anybody because they are numerals).

    Maybe I am not a trademark lawyer and am happily talking out of my ass, though.

  126. "1800+" = 1800 MHz *Duron* not Athlon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Close, but no cigar. AMD's web page says the "1000" performance reference point is a 1000 MHz *Duron*, as measured by their special suite of application benchmarks. (It really is quite a diverse boatload of them -- good for AMD!) Can't be bothered to dig it up and link, sorry.

  127. Short answer: Neither by CGameProgrammer · · Score: 1

    Calling the 64-bit chip the VIIV would be fantastically idiotic marketing. They called their 586 the Pentium -- it sounds cool and has some logical basis ("pent" as in "5"). They liked it so much, they kept it even for the 686, 786, and 886 (which by all rights should be the hexium, septium, and octium). They instead called it the Pentium 2/3/4 because it's obvious which is best. VIIV is either unpronounceable or, if pronounced "veev", merely sounds ridiculous. Keep in mind this company likes names like Itanium, Centrino, Celeron, etc. No, they will not be releasing any "Veev" anytime soon. They likely will just call it the [something] 64, and 64 will be written in arabic numerals because people won't know what the hell VIIV is supposed to be -- we certainly don't, and it's not even a valid roman numeral. LXIV is 64, IIRC. As for VIIV being some sort of graphic representation of a new CPU structure, that can't be true either, again due to the reasons mentioned above.

    --
    ~CGameProgrammer( );
    1. Re:Short answer: Neither by Chazmati · · Score: 1

      I thought they called their 586 the Pentium because of a ruling that they couldn't trademark a number, and of course they didn't want AMD to release an AMD 586.

  128. Th Pentium fallen ladder? by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    It clearly indicates that it is broken too...(/. space?)

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  129. IV is a mediaeval invention by Cardbox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you live that close to the Via Appia Antica then you can pop out and look at the tombs at lunchtime (give Cecilia Metella my love) and check the story I heard from a classics don that IV and IX and XL were mediaeval contracted notations for IIII VIIII and XXXX and the ancient Romans never used them.
    Incidentally, Roman numerals were used in written contracts for quite a long time after we started using Arabic ones for calculation, because it was harder to alter the amounts fraudulently after they'd been written.

    1. Re:IV is a mediaeval invention by crush · · Score: 1

      That is just completely untrue. The Oxford Classical dictionary (3rd ed. "numerals, Roman") is very clear on the point that there were two methods in use pre-mediaevally: the subtractive (IV) and the additive (IIII). I'd like you to cite something to back up your unsupported assertion that the subtractives are mediaeval.

  130. You forgot... by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

    ...the Pentium Pro! Wonder where that fits!!!

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  131. Wow by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

    Wow, none of you smartypants slashdotters know how to read roman numerals.

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
  132. Take your pick. by Joules+Burn · · Score: 1

    5 or 5. Choose wisely

  133. Can't trademark a number IIRC by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

    "Can't trademark a number IIRC"

    Well then that would explain why google is spelled wrong.

  134. VIIV = five bi five by robvs68 · · Score: 1

    Dual-core P5: five-bi-five

    "I'm five by five. How' you do'in B?" - Faith

  135. Further speculation by letdinosaursdie · · Score: 1

    Next is the R.I.P. Nice to see a monster start to fall though. Maybe the borg will follow.

  136. I know just the man.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's Sollog when you need him?

  137. vector 2 vector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seeing as how about the only 'v'-related thing in a processor would be a vector unit, and P2P is such a buzzword as of late (which seems to be redifining cliche naming conventions (eX, iX and now X2X)), that this probably means the have some new vector unit related technologies, and the marketing guys had a focus group party to come up with some new drivel.

  138. other interesting intel trademarks by aminorex · · Score: 1


    The original poster seems to have missed other
    interesting trademark options being held open
    such as "Intel Inside F00F" and "Intel F00F".

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  139. Pattern here! by PeanutGallery · · Score: 1

    Just as I thought.

    They're systematically patenting all roman numerals in a plot to capture and rebuild the ancient Roman empire!

    Think The Colosseum, only with more LED's. Hail Ceasar!

    --
    -- Just another unsolicited opinion... from the Peanut Gallery.
  140. Intel flunked Roman Numerals? by waynegoode · · Score: 1
    There is also a good article at CNET. It has a good quote:

    "I think whoever it was flunked Roman numerals in grade school," said Nathan Brookwood, the head of technology consulting firm Insight 64.

    1. Re:Intel flunked Roman Numerals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think most schools have a class on Roman numerals.

      It's folded into math, generally... which could be the problem.

  141. Where to look for an explanation... by tbase · · Score: 1

    Check the source of their home page for any 1 pixel x 1 pixel images. That'll tell us for sure what they're up to.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  142. Dumb marketing drivel by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    I guess this means they want to brand one of their 64-bit chips as the Pentium "five", which "viiv" sounds a bit like if you're a moron. Move along folks, nothing to see here...

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  143. Excuse me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose some of you have learned something about Roman numerals. They are in order, from left to right, small numbers to the left of a larger are to be subtracted. This means, that:

    VIIV = 5 + (5 - 2)

    or 8!!! and not 64, unless you're blind dumb and stupid, which I wouldn't be surprised if the Intel Inside gang turned out to be.

  144. What does the Intel Trademark really mean? by IamTheExpert · · Score: 0

    Well considering this guy works for Intel I would have to guess the new trademark means two or four Pentium chips duct tape together.
    http://www.doyousnap.com/portal/albums/7/114.aspx/

  145. Lots of interesting posts on this one... by The1Genius · · Score: 1

    There has been a lot of interesting speculation on the item - a good collection here:

    http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/eai/implementation/ar ch ives/002939.asp

    --
    The1Genius - Littera Scripta Manet
  146. duh ;) by TD-2779 · · Score: 1

    It's obvious that they just mirrored the roman numerual 'IV' because it will be 2xPentium4 processors.

  147. How about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this (filed in Canada) rules out the "two Vs separated by lines" theory:

    http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/1243/trdp124330200e. html

  148. the pentium VIIV Conspiracy by cyphercell · · Score: 1

    Maybe they released info about their new patent. So, they can google it for good Ideas. ie. they don't know yet.

    --
    Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism