Slashdot Mirror


How To Talk To Aliens

Frederic Friedel writes: "In their efforts to talk to alien civilizations human beings are currently engaged in sending pictures based on a rectangular array of dots, arranged from left to right and top to bottom. But is this stategy sound? For instance what if the aliens do not see in pictures at all, or if they think in vector graphics rather than bitmap? On ChessBase.com grandmaster John Nunn proposes sending them a trading machine instead."

385 of 525 comments (clear)

  1. What do they want to hear? by suso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One potential problem I think we face is that the potential aliens that we could talk to will have a wide timeframe of technological development. Some of them may be incredibly advanced and maybe already communicating with many other civilizations themselves (call this time C). So the question then becomes, why would they bother listening to us or would they even care what we are saying? On the other hand, there may be life out there, but it might be underdeveloped (call this time B) and cannot even hear us yet.

    Although I think that it is highly likely that their are other civilizations out there, I think that the number of such civilizations that we can currently contact that are between times B and C may be small.

    Right now the human race seems to think that whatever they say is worth listening too, much like stories posted by people on slashdot, in their webblogs, or this very comment. But sufficiently advanced minds aren't always interested in these things.

    So I think a better way to go about it is, what could we send to an advanced civilization that would be interesting to them? Not to us.

    1. Re:What do they want to hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      First Interstellar Spam:
      Boost your engine efficiency by 300% - Contact EARTH!!!!11

    2. Re:What do they want to hear? by Richie1984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But sufficiently advanced minds aren't always interested in these things.

      That's just how I feel when reading about these efforts at communicating with alien civilisations, and recieving their signals. Just because the human race has had a tendancy to explore the unknown, doesn't mean an alien race will feel the same. For all we know, they could be well aware of our existance, but not care one bit.

      --
      I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
    3. Re:What do they want to hear? by pbranes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But how can we possibly conceive what aliens *want* to hear before we have met one? We can only go by what we, as humans, know. What we know is that if we were on the receiving end, we would like some coordinates, some pictures, some sounds, etc.

    4. Re:What do they want to hear? by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      If they were more advanced then us, then they'd be interested in us, whether or not we could benefit them.

      If they are truly that closed-minded that they would not communicate with us, i.e. those less developed than they are, then they are not as developed as they think they might be. After all, isn't an open mind a pre-requisite for higher intelligence?

    5. Re:What do they want to hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least someone in any civilisation would be interested in us.

      After all, there people on earth interested in the behavioural patterns of bacteria... and movie stars.

    6. Re:What do they want to hear? by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But sufficiently advanced minds aren't always interested in these things.

      I dunno.... I'm usually pretty interested in my dog's attempts to communicate. We study ancient/primative cultures. There's no reason to think that aliens wouldn't find us cute.

    7. Re:What do they want to hear? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Christ, if that happens, we'll pretty much *deserve* a little visit from the Vogons.

    8. Re:What do they want to hear? by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

      Exactly... Maybe the counter-analogy is: Are you interested in a tree's attempts to communicate?

      --
      word.
    9. Re:What do they want to hear? by mowler2 · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      Communicating with us humans might be the same to the aliens as it is for for us humans to interact with ants. We are simply not interested in interacting with primitive lesser lifeforms such as ants; why should any hypothetical advanced aliens have any interest in interacting with us, when changes are that they are far more advanced?

      Especially considering if these advanced aliens are probably already used to "extrahomeworld" lifeforms. - "oh, another planet with near-bacteria-level-lifeforms (humans) - booooring".

      However, this does not mean that we should stop our efforts in trying to communicate with others / find life.

    10. Re:What do they want to hear? by Romeozulu · · Score: 1

      Tell that to all the people studying ants and ant colonies. Geez...get off your log. Believe it or not, things happen in this world that you don't know about.

    11. Re:What do they want to hear? by nine-times · · Score: 1
      Insofar as I'm capable of perceiving the tree's attempts to communicate... yes. I am.

      Unfortunately, I think my mind isn't sufficiently advanced to get much of a message from trees. Have you witnessed these attempts to communicate?

    12. Re:What do they want to hear? by Meagermanx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I always thought that curiosity and scientific advancement went hand in hand. If these aliens are so advanced, then wouldn't they be inclined to be curious about other species?

    13. Re:What do they want to hear? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Well, since most humans don't really give a second thought to any of the other species on Earth until they're on the verge of extinction (and that concern only came about recently and still isn't universal), I hardly think we're in a position to judge how "advanced" an alien civilization is based on whether they care about us. As long as they don't use our planet as a toxic waste dump they're more advanced than we are, and even if they do we're not in a position to judge them until humanity is nearly extinct and they still don't care.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    14. Re:What do they want to hear? by Richie1984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why should they be? Perhaps their scientific advances were forced by wars? Or perhaps they were just given their knowledge from another race? It really is impossible to discuss so many hypothetical situations. The point of the matter is that they are alien. Our ways of thinking may not apply to them in the slightest.

      --
      I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
    15. Re:What do they want to hear? by lildogie · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I would add that we have no business trying to communicate with aliens when we're doing such a poor job communicating between all of the humans on the planet.

    16. Re:What do they want to hear? by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      I think any more or less developed human (especially geeky ones) is interested in that a lot! We are curious bunch, humans. I am sure there is well developed (both accepted and gray-area community) studiing how vegetation communicates.

    17. Re:What do they want to hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      None of this bs even matters. If they are not interested in us, then they are not really the ones that we want to talk with anyway.

    18. Re:What do they want to hear? by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh oh... slashdotters are now looking to alien life for "companionship"?

    19. Re:What do they want to hear? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could explain to me why:

      -If something we can agree as constituting "life" exists anywhere but our own planet, it must be not only sentient but intelligent.

      and

      -Any intelligent life that exists anywhere but our own planet must be not just more technologically advanced, but much, much more technologically advanced than us.

      These are two rather silly assumptions a lot of people are making. I don't disagree with the possibility (and planning for such), but it seems everyone takes it as a foregone conclusion! If we stumble upon otherworldly life, it seems much more likely that it will be a simpler form like bacteria of plant life than a tribe of cavedwellers... and even less likely a civilization of hyper intelligent, telepathic humanoids...
      =Smidge=

    20. Re:What do they want to hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your post reminded me of this funny little short story.
      http://www.terrybisson.com/meat.html

    21. Re:What do they want to hear? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      I thought of that too. And I also don't think we should worry as much about talking to other civilizations. We cannot even peacefully and normally talk to our human peers on this planet. There are currently wars and so many conflicts here on earth why would we even want to bother to get involved with aliens? Just imagine how well we can communicate with someone from a different culture (say a tribe in Africa), or would most of us even feel a little uncomfortable around others of a different race, even though we can speak the language?

      I came to realize this during watching Solaris and other movies by Tarkovskii. There is a monologue where one of the characters talks about that.

      I know this sounds like some silly hippie talk, so go ahead mod me down for not wanting to talk to the Romulans.

    22. Re:What do they want to hear? by R.Caley · · Score: 3, Funny
      But how can we possibly conceive what aliens *want* to hear before we have met one?

      Porn.

      However, trying to imagine what might turn on a silicon based amoeboid lifeform with communal intelligence is a real mind bender.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    23. Re:What do they want to hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Vegetation doesn't communicate as such, it just passes laws which we all have to follow.

    24. Re:What do they want to hear? by adolfojp · · Score: 1

      You know, your comment assumes that every other advanced civilization must be open minded, wich I consider to be quite a closed minded opinion.

      Just look at the current examples on Earth.

      Cheers,
      Adolfo

    25. Re:What do they want to hear? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      Right now the human race seems to think that whatever they say is worth listening too, much like stories posted by people on slashdot, in their webblogs, or this very comment. But sufficiently advanced minds aren't always interested in these things.

      Especially when they're stories about how to talk to aliens, who probably aren't even listening, because to them we've still got about 10,000 years to go before we're sufficiently advanced to be worth bothering.

      So I think a better way to go about it is, what could we send to an advanced civilization that would be interesting to them? Not to us.

      Exactly. I can't think of a single thing on this planet that would be particularly interesting to aliens, except perhaps the natural resources. Think V.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    26. Re:What do they want to hear? by laxian · · Score: 1

      When I first started at University of California Santa Cruz, my orientation group was fortunate enough to hear a nice long lecture about the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) by Frank Drake. It was all being filmed by a Japanese TV crew, actually(!!). We all got to ask questions and mine was "Why is it that we're out looking for planets as near to their sun as ours and carbon-based life forms and all that stuff when life in the universe is likely to be completely, totally different from ours?" He replied that SETI knows about what I was talking about, but since we know that carbon-based life exists and that it is likely to exist on certain kinds of planets with certain chemical environments a certain distance from certain kinds of stars - so THAT'S what we're looking for.

      --

      our written thoughts are gifts to our future selves

    27. Re:What do they want to hear? by joanofclark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "What do they want to hear"? i think the more important question is, what do we want to convey? The content of the message should have no purpose other than the goal of communication. If the message contains data that any kind of intent other than communication could be inferred, we open the door to misunderstanding. To me, math is the obvious candidate. Not some kind of fancy equation to demonstrate our intelligence or level of understanding or to probe theirs, but simply numbers. i would send a sequence of numbers, 1 through 10 in order then 1 through 10 in random order. The goal of sending ordered then unordered numbers is to demonstrate that we are sending the message on purpose and that our intent is only to establish communication. If/When we get a reply is when we start focusing on content, as i think this should be based upon what kind of response we actually get. i'm not a wicked smart guy but this seems like the safest, most efficient approach to contacting alien life. i'd hate to see the population of the earth collectively utter "Please don't kill the messenger" because of some galactic misunderstanding.

    28. Re:What do they want to hear? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      One potential problem I think we face is that the potential aliens that we could talk to will have a wide timeframe of technological development. Some of them may be incredibly advanced and maybe already communicating with many other civilizations themselves (call this time C). So the question then becomes, why would they bother listening to us or would they even care what we are saying?

      I am reminded of the Dungcam.

      Aliens may be so advanced that they already know what we're saying. Maybe they have a computer somewhere that sends them a report any time one of us says something of interest to them.

    29. Re:What do they want to hear? by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      For them to be advanced, they'd have to have an interest in discovering things, and thus have an open mind.

    30. Re:What do they want to hear? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Slashdotters are now looking to alien life for "companionship"?

      It's "alien" if you don't understand it.
      Since men don't understand women,
      Therefore women must be aliens!

      j/k

    31. Re:What do they want to hear? by Hyperspac · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to think that aliens wouldn't find us cute.

      As long as they don't find us tasty.

    32. Re:What do they want to hear? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      Right now the human race seems to think that whatever they say is worth listening too, much like stories posted by people on slashdot, in their webblogs, or this very comment. But sufficiently advanced minds aren't always interested in these things.

      Couldn't agree with you more. Even this cocky grandmaster thinks that aliens might somehow give a fuck about the number 10609, or predictably, learning chess. I think that if intelligent life knew we were capable of talking with them, we'd know it by now.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    33. Re:What do they want to hear? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they have a computer somewhere that sends them a report any time one of us says something of interest to them.

      And then what? They mod it up? =)

      Actually, I think the biggest barrier to interstellar communication is that we don't know what they use for carriage return.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    34. Re:What do they want to hear? by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean that they'd be friendly or tolerant.

      Japanese society after the arrival of the Black Fleet became quite interested in Western technology and manners. The same society later combined their significantly upgraded technology and resource-hungry industrial base with xenophobia and fanatical militarism.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    35. Re:What do they want to hear? by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Also, a sufficiently advanced alien civilization might have a tendency to explore the unknown AND not care one bit about our civilization.

      Like us humans do not care much about a dog barking at the mailman, since explaining to a dog the purpose of a mailman's visit is beyond a dog's comprehension.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    36. Re:What do they want to hear? by Floody · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like us humans do not care much about a dog barking at the mailman, since explaining to a dog the purpose of a mailman's visit is beyond a dog's comprehension.

      Ahhh, but might not the dog seem much more interesting if you had never before seen a dog?

    37. Re:What do they want to hear? by gadget+junkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "[...]Or perhaps they were just given their knowledge from another race?"

      ...It has already been done, time and again, here on mother earth.
      First, the greek-latin culture founded the basis for the modern science; after that, the arabs copied and expanded modern science as we know it,, whilst western europe wallowed in the middle ages. after some time, the pendulum swung.
      The problem is, no civilization can "teach" another one scientific progress. If a culture is interested, it will try and learn whatever others have learnt, PLUS it will eventually add some original content of its own. On the other hand, a civilization that does not want to learn most probably won't.

      I always recall the story about the crab nebula. it contains a pulsar, the rotating remains of a supernova, and progressively the rotation is slowing down. it one of the basis of the discovery that you can date novas by timing the rotation of the pulsar remains. We were able to ascertain that, because we know the exact date of the explosion. records say that it could be seen clearly even by day, for days on end. Point is , these records are chinese . no records are available from western europe or arab sources.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    38. Re:What do they want to hear? by lion2 · · Score: 1

      If we ever do communicate with aliens, I believe that it will help bring the entire world together. We humans find many different ways to separate each ourselves from each other. We do it with differences in Race, Religion, Country neighborhoods, beliefs, gangs, etc. If we all of a sudden can communicate with an intelligent Alien race we can probably see ourselves as a whole race and see the Aliens as what is different. There still would be internal seperation but I believe that will be impossible to remedy. I guess we were built this way.

    39. Re:What do they want to hear? by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Men and Women differ by one Chromosome in 26, which works out to roughly a 4% difference in genes. A male Chimpanzee has only about a 2% difference from a male human. Ergo, despite my best efforts in the case of women, I have twice the chance of understanding Bonzo as I do understanding my wife.

      As further proof of that, she doesn't understand this excuse.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    40. Re:What do they want to hear? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1
      > A male Chimpanzee has only about a 2% difference from a male human

      That's only true at the nucleotide / molecular level.

      i.e.
      Chimps are not like humans


      Early molecular comparisons between humans and chimpanzees suggested that the species are very similar to each other at the nucleotide sequence level--a difference of between 1.23% and 5%, Sakaki said. The results reported this week showed that "83% of the genes have changed between the human and the chimpanzee--only 17% are identical--so that means that the impression that comes from the 1.2% [sequence] difference is [misleading]. In the case of protein structures, it has a big effect," Sakaki said.


      Peace
    41. Re:What do they want to hear? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we won't locate those people be radio waves sent to and received from space, which is what this is talking about.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    42. Re:What do they want to hear? by DimGeo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like Talana!

    43. Re:What do they want to hear? by Neoncow · · Score: 2, Funny
      AlienOne: Hmm.. The hyperspatial link seems broken. All of my query lasers aren't getting any resonse.

      AlienTwo: That planet just got posted to SquiggleSpork. It's probably blob of molten iron now.

      AlienOne: <Sounds of amusement>

    44. Re:What do they want to hear? by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1
      So I think a better way to go about it is, what could we send to an advanced civilization that would be interesting to them? Not to us.
      You're assuming they'd ever want to contact us. Hell, you're assuming we'd ever want them to contact us. Think about it. An advanced alien race finds us. They contact us. They meet us. They find out about our lawyers and intellectual property laws. They blast our planet to smithereens, strictly as a precautionary measure. Game over.

      I think people should spend some time thinking this through, maybe we could consider chlorinating the gene pool a bit, straighten up the house so to speak before inviting some other folks over.
      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    45. Re:What do they want to hear? by Lorkki · · Score: 1

      I think it's somewhat redundant trying to guess what any supposed aliens might want to hear from us. If they don't care or are unable to understand us, would it even be worthwhile to attempt sustained contact?

      People often appear to have trouble understanding each other, and it has taken years for researchers to decipher the communication habits of other species on our planet (which are far simpler than ours). Now imagine what it would take to make meaningful contact with a species with habits that are completely foreign to us, in ways that from a human perspective may appear odd or even disgusting.

      In case our playing around with radio transmissions turns up results (of which I remain comfortably skeptic), I'd be content with just the knowledge that there is something out there, but wouldn't hope for anything more in a very long time.

    46. Re:What do they want to hear? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      What if their scientific advances were driven by avoiding contact with strangers? Suppose there is some survival instinct to avoid strangers. After enough time and scientific advancement, everyone on the homeworld is no longer a "stranger". But aliens would be, and contact is instinctively to be avoided.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    47. Re:What do they want to hear? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      What if, by a combination of sensory organs and thought processes, a race of alien creatures posessed intrinsic knowledge of a grand unified theory(TOE), etc. Because of this they have fantastic technological advancement from an early time in their history. In addition, they understand that there may well be millions of other races of sentient creatures in the universe. Being curious and gregarious by nature they put up humongous billboards in space to direct other races to their homeworld.

      These billboards take a shape that they are convinced couldn't be missed by any inelligent species anywhere in the universe. Using their comprehensive knowledge of physics they create a series of objects that stand out in their surroundings. These stellar objects run the gamut from gas clouds and asteroids, stars and black holes, to pulsars, galaxies and quasars.

      Of course the best way to make them stand out is to have them appear normal in almost every way, but make sure that in a few ways that they do not line up exactly with the proper expression of the Theory of Everything. Maybe some of them have gravitation/mass anomolies. Some luminous bodies have strange spectra for their type of composition. Maybe others are out of place in their space-time frame due to artifical placement, like a relatively recent structure galaxy transmitting light from billions of light years away. Or maybe they place a field around a few small solar systems that blue shifts them with respect to every other point in the universe. The deviancies, when plotted and considered as a whole, lead directly to the homeworld of this earliest and greatest of races; one great, big welcome mat spread out for all the creatures of the universe.

      Of course the really funny part is that instead of guiding people to them they are just confusing the hell out of everyone else in the universe. Messing up their experiments and evaluation data. Unfortunately, they do not consider that other races do not understand things as they do since their knowledge is so basic and obvious to them.

      And that is just one, hopefully entertaining, hypothetical anecdote as to why even if we could find aliens it might be well nigh impossible to communicate with them.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    48. Re:What do they want to hear? by spikefruit · · Score: 1
      However, trying to imagine what might turn on a silicon based amoeboid lifeform with communal intelligence is a real mind bender.

      That's obvious. Naked silicon based amoeboid lifeforms with communal intelligence.

      --
      I'm going to become a theologist and a scientist so I can spend long hours into the night arguing with myself.
    49. Re:What do they want to hear? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      1. Humor Impaired?

      2. I'll get serious for a moment.
      Humans share some very old genes, with just about everything alive. There are others like the Ubiquitin producing gene or the gene for making Dihydrofolate Reductase, that most or all the multicellular organisms have the exact same gene, or the HOX genes, that are shared by all vertebrates and have only minor differences with the versions used by creatures as diffferent from us as fruit flys or squid. Some things in genetics seem to code only one way. The 2% measurement for chimps was never very meaningful, as it implied that there could be terrestrial organisms that shared absolutely no genes with us.

      No one appears to have noticed that the number of chromosomes I gave was bogus to get the joke to work out right. It is, of course, 23 pairs, or 46 chromosomes in all human cells except the sperm and egg.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    50. Re:What do they want to hear? by curunir · · Score: 1

      I think that the number of such civilizations that we can currently contact that are between times B and C may be small.

      Right now the human race seems to think that whatever they say is worth listening to.


      True, however I would imagine the fact that they are using radio waves as a means of communication would probably mean that they fall into that category. Those before B won't be able to send radio waves so, for all practical purposes, they don't exist to us. Those after C will probably have developed a technology more efficient than radio waves...something that solves the 50 year transit problem mentioned in the article. Whatever advanced form of communication they've developed is likely bouncing off our unenlightened skulls as we speak just as our radio waves would bounce off the skulls of the unenlightened time B civilization which has no concept of radio waves.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    51. Re:What do they want to hear? by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      President George W. Bush saying "Your amnesty has
      been granted. Sign here for your Social Security
      benefits, and your voter registration as a Republican."
      ("By the way, you are a religious fundamentalist, right?")

      Preferably in Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, Arabic,
      Vietnamese, Indonesian, Korean, or Klingon. So
      much can otherwise get lost in the translation.

    52. Re:What do they want to hear? by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      "There are currently wars and so many conflicts here on earth why would we even want to bother to get involved with aliens?"

      To get arms and military advisors, of course, so we can wipe out the other humans!

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    53. Re:What do they want to hear? by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      The mailman has probably seen many dogs before. Just like us, the universe is probably teeming with selfish destructive little hedonisitic civilizations like our own.

      I think that after a while you just ignore them and concentrate upon the decent, more constructive civilizations.


      I like Genrikh Altov's theory [In The Port of Rock Storms, World's Spring Anthology]The other civilizations are out moving themselves into star clusters where all the advanced civilizations have gathered, and have been living collectively since they first formed. Until we move our solar system into one of those clusters, no one is going to care.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    54. Re:What do they want to hear? by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      I personally enjoy studying these small creatures. Sure, to most they seem small and benign, to others monstrous and foreign, but what fun it is to have a culture of them! I keep a lot of them in my lab --- sure it's against authority rules but how else would you have scientific advancement? It's amazing how many of them can sustain themselves on agar -- and even like it!

      Yes, these stupid organisms truly are one of Nature's wonders. ...

      Bacteria are cool too, I guess.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    55. Re:What do they want to hear? by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      It is very reasonable to assume that anyone that could hear anything we have already sent or will send in the next 30 years will be far and away above our current tech level. So the ONLY reason they would be listening is because they want to hear ANYTHING we have to say, like one listens to a child learn to speak.

      So as most children do first we talk about ourselves and thats ok.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    56. Re:What do they want to hear? by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      They have to be more intelligent than us... they're all somewhere deep in space, and only smart people can get themselves there.

      I mean, they're on some other planet, or something, right?

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    57. Re:What do they want to hear? by edsonmedina · · Score: 1

      However, trying to imagine what might turn on a silicon based amoeboid lifeform with communal intelligence is a real mind bender.

      Japanese porn.

    58. Re:What do they want to hear? by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      I always thought that curiosity and scientific advancement went hand in hand. If these aliens are so advanced, then wouldn't they be inclined to be curious about other species?

      They are probably very curious, but what makes you think they'd be curious about a silly species that keeps sending them dots? It is possibly that they already know all about us anyway. When we probe rats in the lab, do we tell them all about our culture while we do it? Of course not, we just keep them isolated in their little cages and don't tell them anything that's not part of the controlled experiment.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    59. Re:What do they want to hear? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      AlienTwo: That planet just got posted to SquiggleSpork. It's probably blob of molten iron now.

      You mean Slashdotted?

      I came here via the Chessbase site, they are lying in the corner with glazed eyes after a successful Slashdotting.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    60. Re:What do they want to hear? by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      The first one is simply a selection effect - nobody (well, nobody sensible) assumes that all ET life must be intelligent. But since we are talking about talking to ETs, the intelligent ones are the ones we are interested in here. You can't talk to a bacterium.

      The second one is just a guesstimate, based on the assumed average lifetime of a civilisation. Say it's about a million years. We've only been around, say, 100 years (as a radio-communicating civilisation, anyway). So if were to make contact with a random ET civilisation, what are the chances that it is younger than us? Very slim: it's much more likely to be much older than us. Of course, there are a host of assumptions built in to this. Civilisations might not last a century or two into the radio era. They might advance rapidly into other forms of communications, or encounter a technological singularity. Or they might evolve technologically mich slower than we do, or even stagnate after a certain point. But anyway, that's the thinking behind this assumption.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  2. how to talk to aliens by mickyflynn · · Score: 5, Funny

    SHOUT A WHOLE LOT. It makes you easier to understand.

    first post.

    1. Re:how to talk to aliens by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What, like American tourists do in Europe and elsewhere?

      Seriously, two words for you: phrase book.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:how to talk to aliens by Skye16 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or European tourists in America?

      Or no, that statement would be just as stereotypical as the parent's. No, no, I guess we'll all just have to accept there are assholes and idiots everywhere.

      Lucky us :\

    3. Re:how to talk to aliens by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

      My mother is fluent in Italian, French, Spanish, Latin, a good bit of German and Japanese and some Greek and Arabic. I have 3 years of high school spanish 1 semester of Japanese and 1.5 semester of Latin.

      Her french saved our asses in Canada, but got me into even more trouble with French cops in Paris at Jim Morrison's grave when I was 17 (about to turn 21 now). Her Spanish (she teaches it, working on her masters in Santiago de Compostella) got us well enough around Spain. We did fine in Germany.

      The only places I've been without her have been Ireland, England, and Italy. Being of irish blood, looking and sounding like them, I did fine there. England, too. I managed in Italy with my Spanish and Latin, but asking in Classical latin where the bathroom is does tend to get looks.

      I don't shout. I keep my mouth shut and try and blend in as well as I can. I don't like to appear to be a tourist (I hardly ever go to the tourist things). However, I did have bad communication problems in Rome near St John Lattern (the Cathedral in Rome (not St Peter's)) in a resteraunt there. A phrase book would have helped here.

    4. Re:how to talk to aliens by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I've seen both. But what I've seen more of lately is people on Slashdot who can't spot a joke when they see one.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:how to talk to aliens by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      They can't, or they chose to disregard? There's a big difference. If it makes you feel any better, you could imagine I said "heh" and scrolled on to other things. Really, I don't care much either way. :]

    6. Re:how to talk to aliens by spidereyes · · Score: 2, Funny

      After we figure this out we should move onto females.

      --

      I say we just grow up, be adults and die.
    7. Re:how to talk to aliens by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

      There are several areas of Ireland (particularly on the west coast) and Scotland where Gaelic is the native language of the majority of the people. Of course, Irish and Scots are different although mostly the same. Scots came from Ireland (the Picts were there before them). Gaelic is a fun language.

    8. Re:how to talk to aliens by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Seriously, two words for you: phrase book.

      Plus the whole "90% of us speak better English than you..." aspect.

    9. Re:how to talk to aliens by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      But can you ask where the bathroom is in Klingon??? Klingon, second only to 1337 5p34k.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    10. Re:how to talk to aliens by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      SHOUT A WHOLE LOT. It makes you easier to understand.

      No. The typical way an American speaks to a non-English speaking person and they don't get understood the first time is to:

      S P E A KL O U D L Y A N DS L O W L Y

      That often make up for a lack of vocabulary every time!

    11. Re:how to talk to aliens by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      It's true, though, at least in my experience.

      When I'm on the DC metro and I hear people loudly yammering and laughing and in general being obnoxious, it's pretty much 10 to 1 that it's a bunch of French students. Why French? I don't know. But they're speaking French, & they're too skinny and good looking and oddly dressed to be French Canadians. No offense to French Canadians.

      My theory about the Obnoxious American ( or whatever nationality ) is simple: You don't notice the polite, quiet tourists.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    12. Re:how to talk to aliens by laxian · · Score: 1
      I'm an American who's travelled quite a bit and I've noticed that Americans can indeed be pretty loud and obnoxious. Young American backpackers are generally very well behaved ... um ... as far as their public speaking voices go, anyway, because we have a pretty good idea about American reputations. Germans in groups can be pretty loud. But no one seems to mention the loudest groups of them all: the Chinese and Koreans.

      OMG guys. I'm not just lumping THE ASIANS together because I haven't thrown the Japanese in there ... they seem to be quieter. And yes, I can tell the difference between all these languages. The Chinese and Koreans are the loudest. Maybe no one mentions this because somehow Americans, who are of European descent, are more accountable to Europeans, and we should behave *whitely* or something like that. I'm not trying to be racist here (although someone is very likely to call me one any minute now), I'm just saying it's never mentioned.

      Oh yeah, and to keep this all on-topic: Aliens!

      --

      our written thoughts are gifts to our future selves

    13. Re:how to talk to aliens by meiocyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I managed in Italy with my Spanish and Latin, but asking in Classical latin where the bathroom is does tend to get looks."

      I tried that too. The guy said, "It's been a while since your last visit, hasn't it?"

      (an old joke).

      --
      The thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; for the box might even be empty.
    14. Re:how to talk to aliens by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Maybe part of the confusion was that they weren't understanding the way you spoke Japanese? Pronunciation is key!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    15. Re:how to talk to aliens by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      It's probably a local cultural bias.

      It might be highly unexpected for a gaijin to be fluent to the point that it may be denied even in the face of contrary evidence.

      On the other hand, I don't think Americans in the US would blink at all if tourist came by speaking perfect American English, unless it was grammatically far more correct than what the locals were used to; the expectation may in fact be the other way around given that English is a very common non-native spoken language.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    16. Re:how to talk to aliens by clickster · · Score: 1

      Send Chris Rock and Jackie Chan as our intergallactic emmissaries. Alien: gip nib wooooo ghnash lap bah Chris Rock: DO "YOU UNDERSTAND THE WORDS THAT ARE COMING OUT OF MY MOUTH?" Jackie Chan: "Let me try." "Huh. Wa. Wad is it goo fo. Absoluly nuthin"

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    17. Re:how to talk to aliens by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but people don't notice the alien tourists at all, because they're the ones who are really quite. Plus, when they do speak, they've learned the local language. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  3. Just in time by null+etc. · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sure hope someone figures out how to talk to aliens sometime soon. I keep asking the IT guys to fix my computer, but I've not yet gotten a response.

    1. Re:Just in time by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you've yet to grasp the obvious significance of this. Let's see. We send information to aliens and get no response, we send information to IT guys and get no response, therefore IT guys=Aliens.

    2. Re:Just in time by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait a second, you're on /. and you don't know how to fix your own computer?

    3. Re:Just in time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Congratulations, you have successfully worked out what the joke was.

    4. Re:Just in time by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      Wait a second, you're on /. and you don't know how to fix your own computer?

      I know how to fix it, but the longer it remains broken, the longer I can get out of doing work.

    5. Re:Just in time by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      Everyone else who responded to this post is a moron.

      ~D

    6. Re:Just in time by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      no no.. you have it backwards. all Aliens are IT guys. not all IT guys are aliens. some of us are just sociopaths and/or assholes.

    7. Re:Just in time by dodobh · · Score: 1

      We replied, but you were unable to understand our responses. You need time to evolve to the next higher stage of intelligence. We will wait until you achieve sufficient intelligence for communication to succeed.

      Your IT guys.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  4. I got a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We trade'em some pr0n.

    1. Re:I got a better idea by pklong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You never know, they might be picking up our p0rn transmissions already and trying to figure out our mating rituals.

      I dread to think what their conclusions would be!

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    2. Re:I got a better idea by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps they saw a certain goat-related website, and all the anal-probing is just them trying to say "Hello".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:I got a better idea by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Yes, I liked the book "Footfall" too. The fithp reaction to pornography, and the catholic reaction to the fithp reaction, were awesome.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    4. Re:I got a better idea by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      You never know, they might be picking up our p0rn transmissions already and trying to figure out our mating rituals. I dread to think what their conclusions would be!

      But it would make diplomacy far more interesting.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  5. And what if... by aznxk3vi17 · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if they're a communist society? Certainly they shall be disgusted at our capitalist ways.

    This is why we need to send them what everybody loves...

    Pr0n!

    1. Re:And what if... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Somebody already said send them porn. And what if the aliens are disgusted at our sex acts?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:And what if... by pklong · · Score: 1

      ~They got the Discovery Channel don't they? ~

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    3. Re:And what if... by rev_sanchez · · Score: 1

      Let's give them something they've shown interest in for years: colonoscopy vidoes. I say we start with Katie Couric's

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    4. Re:And what if... by utlemming · · Score: 1

      Heck, what if our dot are confused with their porn? We might offend them. Or worse yet, what if our bitmaps are actually comments made in poor taste about their mom? I mean, you could start a galatic war over something like this.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    5. Re:And what if... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't know that, there is no sex in the Soviet Communistic Federation of Sirius.

  6. We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by mfh · · Score: 5, Funny

    But is this stategy sound?

    No. Aliens will look at the pictures and wonder what:
    "ÿØÿà" means, when they open it in a text editor. Simply put, there is no easy way to communicate with Aliens. Here's an example of what I'm talking about:

    Imagine you're on a mountain top and you want to send a communication to someone else on another mountain top. What form of communication do you use? If you're trying to reach another human being you might be able to send smoke signals, and it would help to know what language that person speaks, or the communication won't work -- they will see the smoke but interpret it incorrectly.

    If you fire up a short wave and start sending broadcasting, the other party would only be able to listen if they have the same equipment or at least the ability to listen and understand what you're sending. So high tech is dependant on the odds that your independent civilizations went in the same direction in their research and development, which statistically is likely implausible.

    The bottom line is that we might send information into space that will provoke the wrong response, or worse -- we might cause the aliens to believe that there is a strange natural phenomena on Earth that is not worthy of scientific study, and cause them to ignore any future attempts at communication. We should be attracting aliens by producing a stable intergalactic fleet of killer robot ships. They will want to trade with us if we have heavy firepower. It's a status thing, really.

    If the aliens are evil, they will respect us. If they are peaceful, they will want to come and try to enlighten us. If we have massive intergalactic firepower, it's a win / win.

    If we are weak, the evil aliens will subjugate us into slavery and good aliens will skip us because they have more pressing matters to attend to - such as the rise of a new threat in another quadrant of space they need to try and enlighten.

    Therefore, the missile defense program would benefit Canada and the US - because of the aliens!

    Sending signals into a void won't be successful.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by sucker_muts · · Score: 1
      So high tech is dependant on the odds that your independent civilizations went in the same direction in their research and development, which statistically is likely implausible.
      Well, actually, everything invented for communication technology simply tried to use the nature's methods to make transportation possible. For example: Electricity is simply moving atoms in metals, radio waves are just that, aliens even must find out too that microwaves (with the correct frequency) can make water molecules move and heat food.

      My guess is that they invented/will invent the exact same methods, but only the protocols will be different. Same as file specifications: .doc (evil!), .txt, and so on.
      --
      Dependency hell? => /bin/there/done/that
    2. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      No. Aliens will look at the pictures and wonder what:
      "ÿØÿà" means, when they open it in a text editor


      Solution - ASCII-art!

      Unfortunately, Slashdot's lameness filter pre-emptively reports: 'Don't even think about it.' Spoilsports... :-/

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    3. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by Ligur · · Score: 2, Funny

      The words "which statistically is likely implausible." alone caused a reasoning-loop. Good thing I got rattled back to reality by "intergalactic fleet of killer robot ships".

      --
      Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
    4. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by ccharles · · Score: 1, Troll

      We should be attracting aliens by producing a stable intergalactic fleet of killer robot ships. They will want to trade with us if we have heavy firepower. It's a status thing, really.

      You must be American.

      *duck*

    5. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "aliens even must find out too that microwaves (with the correct frequency) can make water molecules move and heat food."

      Assuming they exist in the small temperature range where water is a liquid.

    6. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by TERdON · · Score: 1

      Well, that WOULD work. Unless the aliens are military superior to us, and get offended by it. But - I suppose you're from the US and can't understand the implications it gives the inhabitants of the country you're trying to invade...

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    7. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      That'll never work. There's simply no way to know what ISO codepage they use.

    8. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      We should be attracting aliens by producing a stable intergalactic fleet of killer robot ships. They will want to trade with us if we have heavy firepower. It's a status thing, really.

      Please please please please, PLEASE keep this idea away from any advisors to president Bush. NASA's budget is already strained, and I fear that this idea implanted in his head would take things down a turn for the worst...

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    9. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      So being militarily inferior is better? We can't even solve our own world's problems, or at least handle the logistical problem of feeding the world's poor, what makes you think we'll be able to build an intergalactic fleet within the next century or two?

      Don't forget, the best we've done is send a living human being and brought back is the moon to give you an idea of how far our range (for human travel) really is. Any weapons we use would either be through the use of missles or rail guns, which we still haven't perfected let alone turn it into a military weapon that isn't mounted on a battleship. Our 'defenses' would probably be the same old really, really thick steel plating we use on our naval ships.

      Think about it. If science fiction holds a SINGLE amount of truth, its that aliens with the ability to travel between galaxies freely would probably be so well armed and so far advanced that we wouldn't stand a chance with conventional forces (You don't explore the jungle without your machete and your rifle). Guerilla warfare would be useless if they decide to just bomb us from orbit. ICBMs would be nearly impossible to aim given the fact that they were never designed to hit moving targets, let alone targets in outer space. Sending images of white flags and people kneeling before their conquerors might offend the invaders who have different customs and a different culture than what has developed here.

    10. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by TERdON · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to suggest that being military inferior is a good thing. I was trying to suggest that sending an invasion fleet to the aliens is a REALLY BAD IDEA - and you just pointed out exactly what would probably happen...

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    11. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      This is just a guess but I'm willing to bet that by the time the human race is capable of building an INVASION fleet, let alone a DEFENSIVE fleet, Slashdot would be in the historical books/texts right along side with newspapers as an outdated method of gathering, sharing and reading news. Not to mention the problem of FINDING aliens when we have nutjobs coming up with theories about 'secret government-alien relations', our scientific elite arguing whether Mars contains/contained life and our pop culture is airing a new theory about alien life every six months.

      Oh and no one mentioned anything about invasions until your brought it up. That of course opens up an entire new discussion regarding space tactics and strategies (static defenses are nearly useless), combat on the third dimension (no gravity) and how to decide whats a military and whats a 'civilian' target (if there is such a thing against our 'opponent' as well as the problem that our 'scanners' are nothing more than photographs interpreted by human eyes with no experence in an alien culture.)

      Conclusion : Unless our first contact with an alien race is friendly (ie. we get EXTREMELY lucky and meet a race similar to the Vulcans), the human race is doomed due to military inferiority, lack of cultural experience and slow adaption from generally 2-D combat to 3-D, gravity-less combat. Meet Klingons? We're not gonna get very far anytime soon. Ur-Quan? Submit or be destroyed. The Covenant? Extinction, unless we're paranoid beforehand and have a fleet built despite never meeting another alien race beforehand in which care we merely delay the inevitable.

  7. Meh ... by jdwest · · Score: 5, Funny


    I bet they don't support PNG, either.

    --

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    1. Re:Meh ... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

      Give them a chance, it takes them fifty years to download the latest IE updates.

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  8. Once they can talk to aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can they tell me how to talk to women?

  9. AppleTalk? by sczimme · · Score: 2, Funny


    Could happen. Hey, it worked for these guys.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  10. Easy by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 4, Funny

    You speak to them in Spanish.

    1. Re:Easy by changcho · · Score: 1

      Y??? Estoy esperando...?

  11. Re:aliens do not talk. by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

    That was a 90s movie, you fool.

    --
    Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
  12. Why even send them anything? by daikokatana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as there is no proof of their existence, sending stuff equals wasting a lot of money. IMHO, we'd better use that money to do some other stuff that actually helps people on our planet.

    --
    http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    1. Re:Why even send them anything? by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1

      It does help people on our planet, the aliens aren't getting anything out of it. Least of all the money spent.

      --
      What keeps me going is my inertia.
    2. Re:Why even send them anything? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      As long as there is no proof of their existence, sending stuff equals wasting a lot of money. IMHO, we'd better use that money to do some other stuff that actually helps people on our planet.
      We already spend a crippling amount of our budget 'actually helping people' already, and have done so for decades. (And many of those programs havw swallowed billions/trillions without any change being visible.)
    3. Re:Why even send them anything? by daikokatana · · Score: 1
      We already spend a crippling amount of our budget 'actually helping people' already

      That still does not justify throwing money away on lost causes...

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
  13. Prime Numbers by NetNifty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On a Star Trek TNG episode I seem to remember Picard tapping out prime numbers to show that he was an intelligent species to another species who were holding him captive, the theory being that maths is a universal constant. Dunno how that would work for communicating, but it would be a good way to show intelligence, or at least draw attention to ourselves if we so desired.

    1. Re:Prime Numbers by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 3, Informative

      They stole this idea from Contact. The first layer of the signal was a list of the first so many prime numbers.

    2. Re:Prime Numbers by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was Picard reading Contact, by Carl Sagan, while he was being held captive?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    3. Re:Prime Numbers by whimdot · · Score: 1

      If you made the prime number too big, the aliens might think you were crackers.

    4. Re:Prime Numbers by mbbac · · Score: 1

      That's how the aliens seek to contact us in Sagan's Contact.

      --

      mbbac

    5. Re:Prime Numbers by haagmm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While that is a good theory, how many people who work in menial captivity based jobs will even gather that the tapping is in fact a prime number? or for that mater what a prime number is? Or considering the Stanford Prison Experiment and the results regarding the opinions of Guards and Prisoners, would they even care?

      Also, how do you SHOW numbers in a universal form over a radio? Binary is not exacly universal, and as the article mentions, how do we assume it will be put together correctly? Perhaps X number of pulses with a break between them, but considering how radio frequencies are monitered here, they might just hear 2 pulses and changing frequencies.

    6. Re:Prime Numbers by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Despite the obvious risk of referring to "The Next Generation" as a good science example to follow, you will remember that Picard's attempt had no effect whatsoever.

      He should have sent them a uuencoded video of Hitler in the 1936 Olympics instead.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Prime Numbers by jshaft · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. You gotta use the elements. Come on, you remember that first season stargate episode.

    8. Re:Prime Numbers by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I found something like that once. On the other hand, the graph of that post's score vs. time looked a lot like an AM signal. Unfortunately, I think the encoded message was more along the lines of "U R A JACKASS" than anything worth publishing.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Prime Numbers by hachete · · Score: 1

      The current set of symbols we know as Mathematics was standardised in the 17th century as a "universal language".

      As for prime numbers, that's as hokey as the Will Smith AppleTalk malarkey. Picard's canard draws on the universal math thing but, as we all know, there's more than one way to represent a number. First we would have to syncronise our number systems with the aliens then we might start talking primes. So something as basic as counting maybe the first point of contact.

      umm. Think of our potential aliens as decoders. Instead of trying to *confuse* our alien decoders, we want to help them. Reverse the normal way messages are encrypted: include redundancy, repetitions, quirkiness. In fact all the things that our decoders use to crack codes. Give them masses of text, ensuring the patterns reinforce each other rather than fight against each other.

      I'd start with similar blocks that were very simple then gradually slide the reading age of the grouped blocks upwards until we got enough coverage so that our alien decoders could get a working knowledge of the "language" (numeric or otherwise).

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    10. Re:Prime Numbers by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. The "meaning of life" stuff.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    11. Re:Prime Numbers by festers · · Score: 1

      Maybe Star Trek got the idea from someplace else, but it wasn't stolen from Contact. The ST:TNG episode in question aired in 1989 (Season 3) while Contact wasn't released until 1997.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    12. Re:Prime Numbers by bnenning · · Score: 1

      1989 (Season 3) while Contact wasn't released until 1997.

      The book was published in 1985.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    13. Re:Prime Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The episode is #318 (season 3 episode 18), called "Allegiance", originally aired March 26, 1990. In case anybody wants to see what he's talking about.

      Posted AC so as not to karma whore.

    14. Re:Prime Numbers by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      , who stole it from Ray Bradbury, who stole it from Vannevar bush, who stole it from the Victorians, who got it from the Maya, who worshipped prime numbers as the speech of the gods.

      Which, of course, means that the aliens already sent us the primes, the maya heard, the british killed them off, and the aliens left in disgust.

      So, maybe we should try a factor table instead.

      PS: the star trek episode in question, "Allegiance," is from 1990. The movie "Contact" is from 1997. If you think Star Trek stole that from Jodi Foster you've been watching too many Quantum Enterprise episodes. Time travel doesn't work that way.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    15. Re:Prime Numbers by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      As the reply from the other post says. The book Contact was published in 1985. Doesn't anybody read anymore?

    16. Re:Prime Numbers by Bad-JuJu-Man · · Score: 1

      As far as communicating with other species, we really suck. Really suck bad. "WE" haven't learned to communicate with a single other species on this planet. Those we do communicate learned to communicate with US. Seriously, chimps, gorillas, hell, your average Golden Retriever has learned to communicate with US, not the other way around. Even my dog is better at it than we are. My dog understand some 15 or so words at least. I havent figured out a single damn bark/growl/whine yet. Not with any specificity. So, maybe the aliens have looked at us and decided we aren't capable of communicating with them, and so...don't even want to bother. Maybe we just can't for some biological or developemental reason.

      --
      ""I don't see an obvious biosynthetic pathway from allicin (CH2=CHCH2SS(=O)CH2CH=CH2)to isothiocyanates (R-N=C=S) ""
    17. Re:Prime Numbers by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      The book contact doesn't do the prime number thing. It does a much more satisfying math sequence, and was dumbed down for the movie. Besides, Ray Bradbury had this in the 60s, which still predates that book, and Vannevar Bush and the Maya were both dead by then, so . . .

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    18. Re:Prime Numbers by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anybody read anymore?

      Like the earlier post said, TNG couldn't have stolen the idea from Contact.
      Chuckle.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  14. maybe this is not so smart? by Interfacer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We seem to try very hard to draw some inter galactical attention to ourselves, just like any restaurant wanting to attract customers.

    the only difference being: we do not sell the food, we are the food.

    anyone who has the means of traveling here from outer space outclasses us by several orders of magnitude. thus we are in no bargaining position if we have (or are) something they want.

    this raises the question: should we try to make ourselves heard, or should we try to detect others?

    1. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by BaudKarma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What could we possibly have that's so freaking special that these aliens would have to come here and take it from us? Resources? Plenty of asteroids and uninhabited planets out there. Food? Probably lots of planets out there teeming with life that somehow just never got the intelligence thing going.

      Sure, you can make up some horror movie reason for them to invade (They need our WOMEN! To BREED!) but I think most alien races who investigate us will mark us down as just another carbon-based bipedel life form, nothing special, make a note and move on to the next system.

      The article is utter crap, by the way. First, let's laugh at the idea that the aliens might read right to left, and thus will be totally incapable of deciphering our messages. And the main thrust of the article sounds like something from Master of Orion. We send the alien race a machine programmed with all of our secrets, and they "trade" by transmitting one of their secrets to us, upon which our machine releases a secret to them. The machine is, of course, totally hack-proof. And secrets are these nice little comparmentalized things, like Neutronium Armor or Black Hole Generators, which can be traded one-for-one.

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
    2. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Tourist attraction? Saturn's rings, plus the Earth/Moon double planet, might be interesting.

      Or art? I always imagined that in the replicator-rich society of Star Trek, original art would be one of the few valuable things left. It's an interesting area of thought, ruined of course by the script writers breaking the replicators every five minutes for plot reasons.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    3. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

      You could admire the rings or the moon without having to obliterate the human race.

      Art? I *suppose* there could a be huge, galaxy-wide demand for clown paintings, or something.

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
    4. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by TobascoKid · · Score: 1


      the only difference being: we do not sell the food, we are the food.


      I dunno, I would think that a species that has been able to master interstellar spaceflight would have been able to work out how to feed itself without having to conquer inhabited worlds.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    5. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      the only difference being: we do not sell the food, we are the food.

      Highly Unlikely - here is why.

      There are a number of "metals" and other elements and basic molecules that we require in small amounts in our diets. The reason that we require these small amounts is that during the process of evolution, these impurities (poisions actually) were present in the environment. Lead for example, was not common, therefore, it is a primary poison. However, trace amounts of things that are normally poisionous (i.e. arsenic) are present and required for us to function.

      The specific concentrations of these elements would have to match the aliens concentrations closely (that is even assuming that they breathe oxygen instead of say, sulphur dioxide).

      Our basic meals would likely be toxic to them - and so would our flesh.

      They would not want us for food.

      The only likelyhood of us being enslaved for "food" would be by a giant alien pharmaceutical company. Our complex molecules (read, all the complex molecules on the planet) may hold interest for them. However, if they have achived intergalactic travel, they probably have the technology to build any molecule that is physically possible to build as well.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    6. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by XPACT · · Score: 1

      Resources? What recourses? :))) Can you imagine what kind of technology allows FTL If you have that technology, you don't need resources, you can simply make them (assuming you can make anti-matter and etc.)

    7. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, we should definately turn off the multiple megawatt message lasers broadcasting peace, prosperity, and the hope for communication, because nobody's going to see the hundreds of gigawatts of waste light and heat generated by tokyo alone.

      Maybe you didn't realize this, but earth gives off more radiant energy than a brown dwarf. If we really want to hide, we need to do two things:

      1) build a wall around the entire planet
      2) get a really fast corvette and drive around collecting the radio waves we've been giving off for a hundred years

      (and because I'm on slashdot, 3) ???, 4) profit)

      Translation: put out the welcome mat. We announced our presence long, long ago.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    8. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      You could admire the rings or the moon without having to obliterate the human race.

      Well, I don't know about you, but when I visit a tourist place I do like to try the local cuisine.

      Of course, since the aliens have completely different terms of perception than we do, they probably would prefer clown paintings to Constable...

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    9. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by rkaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. Untill now we have failed to communicate with any other lifeforms than our own, right here on planet Earth.

      We also fail to accnowledge other lifeforms the rights to a habitat or even life itself.

      This might just indicate that we should rehearse our understanding and dealing with other lifeforms locally, before even considering any intergalactic chit chat.

    10. Re:maybe this is not so smart? by uberjoe · · Score: 1
      We don't have to TRY to make ourselves heard. We have been making ourselves heard since the invention of radio and televison. And besides, don't you think that in the off chance that we are chemically compatable with aliens, and on top of that they happen to like the way we taste, wouldn't it be much more economical for them to syntheisze whatever it is in us that makes us taste so good with white wine and cheese, then to travel billions of miles just to snatch up people and take them home to eat us?

      Or lets say they failed econ, and took a bunch of ag classes. Wouldn't they be just as happy with a few breeding pairs, instead of coming here like laying waste like so many conquistidors?

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  15. I always talk to the unknown... by Zangief · · Score: 4, Funny

    With my old trusty rocketlauncher.

    I never leave home without it.

  16. I for one.... by oliana · · Score: 4, Funny

    welcome our chess playing urg alkjdlkwmne
    ----------
    'lo all, we hve descph3rd U'r lanugage from th!s thing U call the 'net.' We hoope U get our l33t! commun!casion. struth afk
    ----------
    overlords.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, asses suck this joke.
  17. Worse yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if what we are sending them translates as insults in their language?

    1. Re:Worse yet... by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      I seem to be having some problems with my lifestyle.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
  18. They not undestand us by michelcultivo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But we are seeking for life outside Earth using our standards (carbon, voice frequency). Who tell us that aliens have our biotype and can understand what are we saying of what wee send to the space?

    1. Re:They not undestand us by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why our science has assumed that other life would be carbon-based.

    2. Re:They not undestand us by myukew · · Score: 1

      "voice frequency"
      I doubt the scientists SHOUT REALLY LOUD AT THE SKY to make them heard. We use radiowaves to communicate. They are quite usefull as they do *not* rely on physiological features the aliens might not have. Furtherwore we try to use maths (like prime numbers for example) not plain Suaheli to draw attention to our messages.

    3. Re:They not undestand us by Ligur · · Score: 1

      I not understand your subject line.

      --
      Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
    4. Re:They not undestand us by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why our science has assumed that other life would be carbon-based./i

      well.. carbon combines with other friendly atoms like hydrogen really well.. when carbon is oxidized during respiration of terrestrial forms, carbon dioxide is the result. This molecule is easily ejected from the system as waste. If you look at what has been considered as a good canidate for replacing carbon.. which is silicon, the same type waste of oxidation forms a lattice with 4 oxygen surrounding it.. silicon dioxide.. a solid. Much harder to get rid of.

      It's little things like this that make us look in certain spectrums for life.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    5. Re:They not undestand us by mazarin5 · · Score: 1
      Well, there are two parts. First, most complex chemical compounds that are stable for long periods of time are largely carbon and hydrogen based. The study of these compounds is in fact called "organic chemistry." We assume that complex organisms have systems composed of organics.

      Secondly, it's a question of abundance. It's entirely possible that life could be made out of francium, however there's simply not very much of it in the universe. (No more than 2 grams on the Earth right now!)

      Also a factor is that we limit our definition of what life is in a useful way. For instance, if we define life as something that consumes and creates waste, reproduces and eventually expires, then fire would qualify. However, it's a little silly to consider fire living, and so we narrow our scope of what "life" can be. In order to use our limited resources to accomplish such a daunting task, we just have to focus on a small demographic: carbon, sentient, sufficiently advanced to receive our signal.

      --
      Fnord.
    6. Re:They not undestand us by westlake · · Score: 1
      I always wondered why our science has assumed that other life would be carbon-based.

      The short answer is that carbon is abundant and bonds easily with other elements to form complex and relatively stable long-chain molecules with the potential for further evolution.

    7. Re:They not undestand us by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess when your field is the entire universe, it helps to constraint your search somehow.

      Thanks to everyone for the input, I'm amazed nobody flamed me.

    8. Re:They not undestand us by XSpud · · Score: 1

      There's a good description of the unique chemistry of carbon, and the reasons why silicon-based life is unlikely here

  19. If there's one thing we've learned from SoapTrek.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...then it's the fact that all aliens speak english, everywhere, be they green-blooded pointy-eared intrigant warmongers or some kind of vampiric drow-morlocks from another galaxy. OK, that was SG:Atlantis, but anyway, everyone speaks english. Except Klingons. Out of spite, I suppose.

  20. The message should be... by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something to the effect of "Hello and welcome to the Earth. Please ensure you have filled out all necessary documentation and are carrying a valid Earth passport. Aliens that are not in compliance with current Earth visitation regulations will be sent back to planet of origin. Thank you."

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  21. Missing the point by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point of sending up any type of message is in hopes that the receiving party will recognize it as something of extraterrestrial (from the alien standpoint) origin and will investigate. That's why we look for radio waves with non accounted for sequences. The aliens could be trying to send us a picture, or a string of characters, or whatever, but we probably won't ever know it. We will however know that it is not natural and will further investigate. We hope that other intelligent life will do the same.

  22. Re:aliens do not talk. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I believe he is confusing Independence Day with Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

    He clearly should not be posting on /.

  23. I have a better idea by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stop announcing that we are here.

    Odds are, there's nobody out there listening. Seriously. Space is really big and really empty. The nearest star with a planet is mind-numbingly far away, and the nearest star likely to have a planet which supports life as we know it is even farther away. It's a safe bet that one would need to go yet even farther to find a planet where even tool-users have evolved, let alone an advanced civilization.

    If anybody out there is able to get the and reply anytime soon, then they are probably sufficiently advanced that they would probably regard us as little more than animals. Very noisy animals. They will simply blow up the Earth to stop us from hogging bandwith with out SETI broadcasts.

    So please, for the sake of humanity, STFU.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    1. Re:I have a better idea by MoxCamel · · Score: 2, Funny
      They will simply blow up the Earth to stop us from hogging bandwith with out SETI broadcasts.

      So please, for the sake of humanity, STFU.

      Er...I thought SETI listens, not broadcasts.

      Mox

    2. Re:I have a better idea by wjsteele · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the neareset star with a planet is approximately 93,000,000 miles from Earth.

      And, my prediction is that they will blow up the Earth to make room for a new intergalactic highway bypass. (Unfortunatly, it'll probabally get destroyed just 5 minutes before it completes running a program that will give us the ultimate answer... oh, it's been working on it now for almost 10 million years.)

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    3. Re:I have a better idea by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      not to mention that anything we pick up eventually might be copyrighted or patented by these aliens...

    4. Re:I have a better idea by ari_j · · Score: 1

      it'll probably get destroyed just 5 minutes before it completes running a program that will give us the ultimate answer

      You mean before it completes running the program that will give us the ultimate question, don't you? Do you need to repeat a grade? ;)

      (On Slashdot, this will either be moderated as Flamebait or Informative. Crazy, but true. Of course, this parenthetical will either get Troll or Insightful mods, too.)

    5. Re:I have a better idea by Golias · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, but the various "send shit out into space" projects don't have a funky and well-known name, and I was having too much fun with my rant to get bogged down with facts. (Or, as I see while reading it again, grammar.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:I have a better idea by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny
      UNIVERSE
      Population: 0
      It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them. However, not every one of them is inhabited. Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds. Any finite number divided by infinity is as near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the Universe can be said to be zero. From this it follows that the population of the whole Universe is also zero, and that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the products of a deranged imagination.
    7. Re:I have a better idea by Golias · · Score: 1

      Douglas Adam's joke is ruined by the currently accepted theory that the universe is finite.

      Nevertheless it is really really big and really really empty, so life in the Universe can still be rounded down to zero. We probably are alone, and if not, we will probably never know it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:I have a better idea by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I need a little more Deep Thought on this. :-) Of course, Earth was trying to figure out what the ultimate question was... which is, ultimately the ultimate answer... isn't it?

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    9. Re:I have a better idea by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      There aren't an infinite number of worlds. Space may be (close to) infinite, but matter isn't. The amount of matter in the universe is finite, as such, so are the number of stars and planets.

    10. Re:I have a better idea by Doctor+Fishboy · · Score: 1

      Douglas Adam's joke is ruined by the currently accepted theory that the universe is finite.

      Actually, no. There is a finite age for the universe (about 13 billion years) but that does not mean that the universe is that size. There's evidence to suggest that the universe is considerably larger than that, and possibly even infinite in extent.

      Dr Fish

    11. Re:I have a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, the neareset star with a planet is approximately 93,000,000 miles from Earth.

      The nearest planet with a giantic ball of gas in an irregular orbit, sure.

      Life on Earth is made possible by several important factors:

      1. The Earth is just the right distance for most of the water to be in liquid form most of the time.

      2. The star it orbits is stable enough for that distance to be about the same temperature all the time, and this has been the case for at least a few million years.

      3. The Earth stays at about that distance all the time in a stable, nearly-circular orbit.

      4. The Earth is large enough to support an atmosphere, but small enough not to become a crushingly heavy gas giant.

      5. There are exteremly massive planets in outlying orbits or the same star system which tend to attract a lot of debris which might otherwise collide with Earth.

      6. Those big planets are also in stable, fairly circular orbits, and are in no danger of colliding with Earth.

      There nearest star where all these conditions are likely to be meet? More than 93 Million miles, I bet.

    12. Re:I have a better idea by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Nope. The ultimate answer is 42. Only in Jeopardy, a hopelessly backwards game show popular only on one insignificant planet in the backwoords of the galaxy, would the ultimate question also be the ultimate answer. ;)

    13. Re:I have a better idea by PeteDotNu · · Score: 2, Informative

      "However, not every one of them is inhabited."

      With you so far.

      "Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds."

      Does not necessarily follow from the preceding statement.

      --
      My other processor is big-endian.
    14. Re:I have a better idea by ari_j · · Score: 1

      At least you caught that (a) it is a joke and (b) it's from Adams' work. Contrast with the other responses to my comment, who all deserve the '-1: Whoosh!' mod.

    15. Re:I have a better idea by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It's too late.

      For the past 50 years, we've outshone the sun in the frequency bands from L/MF to UHF at least. Regardless of whether a signal is specifically sent as a communication for a possible alien species, an alien species that is doing their own SETI will see the racket that the Earth is emitting in this frequency band.

    16. Re:I have a better idea by KyleJacobson · · Score: 1

      ""However, not every one of them is inhabited."
      With you so far.
      "Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds."
      Does not necessarily follow from the preceding statement."

      It doesn't have to follow the preceding statement. What he said is true, even though there are an infinite number of worlds, but not all are inhabited, and infinite amount of space, there has to be a finite number on how many worlds are actually inhabited. Considering there must be (to our knowledge) specific conditions to sustain life, and those conditions are very fragile, only a finite number of planets will have those conditions.
      For all we know, the ratio could be 1-100,000,000,000,000 for inhabited-uninhabited, or it could be 1-100... The more we find (if any), the more that number will change, and the more we can guess as to how many other occupied worlds are out there.

      --
      I have worse karma than M$.
    17. Re:I have a better idea by crispy · · Score: 1

      Thank you. The problem with inifinities is that there are so many different kinds. In my opinion, if space were infinite, that would imply an infinite number of inhabited planets, though probably a countable amount. While the infiniteness of the universe is clearly uncountable.

      You can think of this like integers vs real numbers. Both are infinite, but the fact that there's an infinite number of numbers between any two real numbers, makes it a lot MORE infinite.

      And you still can't divide infinities. At best you can take a limit...

      --
      My sig has a broken link in it.
    18. Re:I have a better idea by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      Just a question, why is it modded as Troll?

    19. Re:I have a better idea by rocketfairy · · Score: 1

      You think aliens are likely to kill us for hogging bandwidth? You know, they're not exactly like /. users ...

    20. Re:I have a better idea by Golias · · Score: 1

      "Finite and unbounded" was Einstein's model, and nobody's come up with a compelling reason to think otherwise so far.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    21. Re:I have a better idea by Doctor+Fishboy · · Score: 1

      "Finite and unbounded" was Einstein's model, and nobody's come up with a compelling reason to think otherwise so far.

      Sure, but cosmologies with zero and negative curvature work just as well. Until we can measure the difference between "finite and unbounded" (positive curvature) and "infinite and unbounded" (negative curvature) we can't say which one is the correct description of our universe.

      Most measurements put the universe's geometry as zero plus or minus a measurement error. The measured error puts a 'minimum size' of the universe on the scale of 24 Gigaparsec, at least.

      Reference paper :http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310233

      Dr Fish

    22. Re:I have a better idea by sahonen · · Score: 1

      93 Million Miles is the distance from the Earth to the nearest star.

      1 AU is the mean radius of Earth's orbit. If you still haven't figured it out yet, I salute your stupidity.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    23. Re:I have a better idea by jpaxman · · Score: 1

      >You can think of this like integers vs real
      >numbers. Both are infinite, but the fact that
      >there's an infinite number of numbers between any
      >two real numbers, makes it a lot MORE infinite.

      Bzzt! Invalid analogy.

      There are also an infinite number of rational numbers between each integer, yet there are the same number of rationals as integers (there exists a 1-1 and onto mapping).

    24. Re:I have a better idea by PeteDotNu · · Score: 1

      I expect that the parent commenter had some mod points.

      Anyway, everything I post gets modded as troll or offtopic by somebody. I think I'm being followed.

      --
      My other processor is big-endian.
    25. Re:I have a better idea by crispy · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course. This is what I get for only taking one semester of analysis...

      --
      My sig has a broken link in it.
  24. Just use a translator, or take lessons... by Rahga · · Score: 1

    I learned everything I know about alien languages from Celestia. You may know her as 'Anne Heche'... She has a primer for alien languages that is included as part of a Barbara Walters interview, and it rocks.

    It's all centered around what is called The Gospel Of Love. The doorway to Celestia's Heaven is in Fresno.

  25. Ha! by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    The AI could be instructed to trade up to a particular level and then it would require authorisation from Earth confirming that the traded items had been received before proceeding. This would slow things down but it would still be a lot faster than working without the AI at all.

    ERROR: You do not have a client license for the feature NUCLEARFUSION. Please contact licensing@earthtechnologysales.earth and report FlexLM error number 0x7008930B.

  26. Meaningful communication? by perkr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if we manage to send data in an understandable format, how do alies actaully go about and *understand* it. In communication studies they talk about common ground, two parts of a communiaction must share a basic notion of the primtive concepts. However an alien race might have completely different concepts to begin with. How do they see that they receive a message with our intent? There are patterns in everything, but you need some basic things to hold onto to seperate noise patterns from what you really want to see.

    1. Re:Meaningful communication? by sonicattack · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting question.

      What if they share none of our five senses? Will communication still be possible? Imagine the scenario, where we effortlessly announce our skill in math (know this, alien friends: we can count prime numbers!), but all further communication break down since we share no other common concepts.

      Hey, but if they are receiving our signal, doesn't that indicate at least some common knowledge of science? Maybe not. They could be receiving our signal directly into their brains, interpret it as their own sudden, spontaneous idea of counting prime numbers, and with a burst of energy involuntarily reply back the following 200,000 numbers, without ever realizing the distances the communication was spanning, and the scientific impact it made on some small blue planet, which existence they never will know of, or would be able to understand.

    2. Re:Meaningful communication? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      My solution to this is to just send EVERYTHING. As much data as we can find. All the written text we have. The more data the aliens have, the better a shot they have at interpreting it. Sure, include a primer of some kind to make things as easy on them as possible, but if they have smart people on their planet, all they'll really need is enough data to work with.

    3. Re:Meaningful communication? by groot · · Score: 1

      In XML, no? ;)

      --
      "Just remember, it takes a village idiot." -- The Motley Fool.
  27. Interstellar Digital Rights Management by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Won't work on aliens any more than it'll work on humans.

    If you send someone some information and the key to unlock that information then you haven't actually protected yourself.

    1. Re:Interstellar Digital Rights Management by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um, which is why you only send them half of the key. PKI isn't impressed by a large count of lightyears.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    2. Re:Interstellar Digital Rights Management by argent · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um, which is why you only send them half of the key.

      If you don't send them the whole key, then there's no point in sending the DRM-protected self-destructing AI. And, for that matter, there's no point in sending the encrypted data at all, since the latency of the link is so high (years) that latency far dominates bandwidth that you're not saving anything.

      If the bandwidth is so low that latency doesn't dominate bandwidth, then you can't afford the overhead of the self-destructing AI in the first place.

  28. Talking to aliens eh? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    All your base hmmm?

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  29. Speaker-to-Klingons by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember, if you are communicating with Klingons, loudspeakers that playing recordings of properly-structured sentences is not enough. There must be a device to spray spittle at the same time the sound is output.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  30. Hmm, that's a pretty dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Of course a chess master thinks that teaching people to play chess is the solution to the world's problems. What else would he think?

    If all you know of a culture is how to play chess, when you visit you'd be shocked to see that people don't move with rigid constraints based on their title, and that not everyone is trying to "mate" a "king." Just absurd.

    Now, sending general purpose AI... that's brilliant. If we could design a HAL 2000 to send at the speed of light to the aliens, that's a very different thing indeed.

    1. Re:Hmm, that's a pretty dumb idea by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      The idea of sending an AI for aliens to interrogate reminded me of something, and after a bit of Googling I found what I was looking for.

      In the Fountains of Paradise, a certain Mr. Arthur Clarke proposes an alien civilisation communicating with others by means of the 'Starglider' probe - basically a small, easily-accelerated device with a highly advanced AI on board. Naturally, our own Solar System is the temporary host for of one of these, and as an aside, it disproves the entirety of our religious works in the matter of a few minutes after some foolish groups decide to transmit them to it...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  31. Over the top by mmarlett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can he suggest that a bitmap image is too complicated but that having the aliens compile an AI we send them is easy cheesy? Why would we send them what would have to be a supermassive program full of mostly encrypted data and assume that they would figure out how to run it but not figure out how to crack the encryption. It's like saying, "Instead of sending them a photo of a submarine, let's send them the blueprints and the parts (but with some parts of the blueprints blacked out and those parts in a sealed black box)." It just doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:Over the top by iNetRunner · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suppose you could send a bitmap that depicts basic logical operations. Then you send a picture about a network of logical operations that references those in previous piture but uses less information to represent them (because they are known from the previous pictures). These logical presentations then depict how to process the next batch of information that is more heavily compressed (and has error correction). And then you send the AI.

      *Or you could send them an Mac virus that installs the AI into their system..*

      Anyway. Reading the article, at least I, got the feeling that constructing that kind of AI might be pretty damn difficult. Oh well, using AIs might really be the best way to communicate..

      --
      Store with salt
  32. I don't want aliens to talk to me by Kimos · · Score: 1

    That's why I wear my tinfoil hat wherever I go.

  33. What if they are stupid? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For instance what if the aliens do not see in pictures at all, or if they think in vector graphics rather than bitmap?

    Huh? What method of visual representation do we "think in"? My brain does not work on bitmaps, or vectors, but on a pattern-analysing neural nework. In other words, my brain is not limited to a single representation scheme, and I seriously doubt that an alien culture capable of receiving these messages would be so limited.
    1. Re:What if they are stupid? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Huh? What method of visual representation do we "think in"? My brain does not work on bitmaps, or vectors, but on a pattern-analysing neural nework. In other words, my brain is not limited to a single representation scheme, and I seriously doubt that an alien culture capable of receiving these messages would be so limited.

      Quite true, but that's only relevant if you're sending a postcard or a similar tangible picture. With radio communication, all you can send is a string of data. How do you know if a byte represents one pixel, one Fourier component, one vector component, or something else?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:What if they are stupid? by babtras · · Score: 1

      Our field of vision is not really rectangular, so I would think the most obvious way to represent an image would be a circular or eliptical image. The stream of data could represent a bitmap starting with the centre pixel and spiralling out.

      Clockwise or counterclockwise is the question.

    3. Re:What if they are stupid? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Our perception of left vs right is pretty arbitrary anyway. Someone did an experiment where people wore up/down reversing glasses, and after a while they got used to it, and their perception of the world suddenly flipped over so it appeared normal to them. When they took them off, everything appeared upsode-down for a while. Clockwise vs anticlockwise would just create a mirror image, so I wouldn't worry about it. If the first image were one of the galaxy, they could make a guess that the direction is the same as the galaxy's spin.

  34. Lets do the Perl test! by ardor · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they can understand Perl, they can understand just about any human language.

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    1. Re:Lets do the Perl test! by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      If they can understand Perl, they can understand just about any human language.
      Ack. If they ever found out that we were the source of that evil, they'd nuke our planet on principle.

      You remember Independence Day? They didn't want our natural resources, they were just pissed off after a thousand-year-long Perl debugging effort.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:Lets do the Perl test! by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1

      Nah ... they'll probably think it is line noise.

  35. whatever they say is worth listening too by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Well how many people run SETI at home?

    Time A aliens may well be listening for other aliens, just are we are running SETI at home.

    Someone, not sure who, descided that we should look for FM signals perticular wave band because that was the easiest way to send a signal accross space so that's what we should look for. I think they use the same reasoning with the send out messages which seems fair.

    I don't think they send out messages any more just incase the alines are of the vorgon destroyer type. But I think if they were it woudn't matter if we sent out a signal or not.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  36. Earth Girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we can find out if Earth girls are easy.

  37. BAD IDEA by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    When they see that we have the tubgirl, they'll think we abducted an alien and then TOTAL CHAOS!

  38. He's awfully trusting by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The AI program would continually check its own integrity and its ability to modify itself. If these checks failed then it could self-destruct. The aliens would then have to start again with a fresh copy of the program which would, at the least, be irritating. The data would of course be heavily encrypted, and the AI program would, in addition to being immensely complicated, be constructed with numerous layers of self-modifying code, so that effectively the only way the aliens could find out what the program does would be to run it. Then, however, the program would be self-aware and would have the ability to self-destruct if necessary.
    He's obviously never tried protecting a game against the retro-addition of a save game crack! Seriously, I doubt a system could be completely protected purely in software running on untrusted hardware.
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  39. Why make it complex? by theolein · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are so many basic assumptions in communicating with possible aliens, such as assuming they even use radio, that it seems patently wasteful to try and second guess what an alien civilisation would or would not understand. If one is going to use radio messages, wouldn't it simply be the easiest to beam a pattern that is obviously artificial, repeated endlessly. The actual content of the pattern should be as simple as possible, but needn't even contain anything meaningful, since anything meaningful is probably only going to be meaningful to us.

    Any civilation spotting the repeated pattern and deducting that it is artificial would then hopefully respond. Sure, the actual modalities of how to communicate with them would then take centuries or decades, but why were you were hoping for ET to walk into your living room next week in the first place?

    The universe is a big place and travel amongst the stars, even at light speed, is a multigenerational process.

  40. So how are they testing their hypotheses? by whitroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have they tried talking to dolphins, who we are pretty damn sure are intelligent?

    mark

    1. Re:So how are they testing their hypotheses? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Intelligent, possibly, build-radio-receiver intelligent, no.

      Are they demonstratively motivated to care to attempt interpretation of stuff plopped in front of them even if you do the radio receiving, compute translating for them (which would change the outcome as the translation from a radio signal to a form that will be seen will certainly be a key part of sorting it out)? A target species for broadcasts would certainly have to be motivated to mull the point over and try to make sense of it, while the dolphin will think 'I don't give a damn about your dots, now give me a fish'. It is simply completely impossible without prior knowledge of a species communication to have a message so obvious that they will listen even if they don't care to think at all.

      Essentially, we are not merely looking for intelligent life, we are looking for sufficiently technologically evolved life to have any hope of them receiving a message, and species that, like us, are actively searching for non random signals, and would jump on a signal and antagonize over it immediately to sort it out. You simply cannot produce a sample of life to prove whether or not it works on anything but other humans.

      However, if relations do go south with aliens, the Dolphin's may leave a note:
      So long, and thanks for all the fish.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  41. Just needs to be nonrandom by mustbepatient · · Score: 1

    Think about it - as long as what we're sending out is clearly nonrandom, an alien race would interpret it to mean there is someone trying to communicate. Send Fibonacci sequences or something.

    1. Re:Just needs to be nonrandom by vesuvius2005 · · Score: 1

      Send them pi.

    2. Re:Just needs to be nonrandom by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      "Send them pi."

      Apple or banana cream?

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    3. Re:Just needs to be nonrandom by Arduenn · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Do as The Man (Carl Sagan) suggested: send them prime numbers at pi times the main hydrogen absorption frequency.

  42. Confusion by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    Why confuse the poor bastards by assuming that their cognitive apparatus is so radically different than ours, when it's most likely not? Chances are that they evolved somewhere basking in enough stellar energy to support complex life, so it's highly doubtful that they would have achieved space travel without having at least evolved the ability to percieve light and discern imagery. So just show 'em some pictures of the kids, a newspaper or two, and maybe some porn. All this geometric and binary crap is just going to confuse them; they'll spend lots of time trying to figure out stuff that not even we understand, when all they'll really want is to observe us as we are!

  43. Re:aliens do not talk. by justkarl · · Score: 1

    President: What do you want us to do?

    Alien(through Brent Spiner): Just DIE!!!

  44. Good at chess but childish logic by PepeGSay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Check out this little gem "I think there are good ways round the first objection. The AI program would continually check its own integrity and its ability to modify itself. If these checks failed then it could self-destruct. The aliens would then have to start again with a fresh copy of the program which would, at the least, be irritating.

    The article starts off pretty good, but devolves into some rather circular and odd logic. He does bring up an interesting problem, but he should have just given us an outline of the solution... instead of the drivel that finishes the article.

    1. Re:Good at chess but childish logic by The+Cookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      No, it started off with drivel too. Alien races that can recieve binary communication but can't conceive/convert from raster to vector (his example), the idea that orientation is important enough that getting it wrong will destroy the message yet the aliens are too stupid to analyse all 4 orientations.

      If that was a slashdot post I wouldn't even mod it +1 insightful.

  45. And once they've received our message by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    How are they going to moderate it?

    Troll? Offtopic? Flamebait? Interesting? Funny? Insightful?

    The aliens I would really like to communicate with are the more ancient ones who are going to metamoderate...

    1. Re:And once they've received our message by SamSim · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the aliens, but if we got a signal from them, then regardless of the signal's content, I imagine the only possible moderation would be "Informative"...

  46. the problem of source by myukew · · Score: 1

    the article mentions an AI to be send to the aliens to trade information with them. The problem is, once this all knowing AI reached them they won't bother trading mith it. Instead they'd just disassemble it and instantly gain access to all the worlds knowledge. not the smartest way to trade IMHO

  47. Just send them an email. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is a way you can talk to aliens AND enrich the bottom line. Just send them space spam:

    "I am Gugvunt Blaharn,the only son of late former Grand Dominator, Chief Gugvunt Vader Sr of Vulcan Diamond and Mining corporation.

    I must confess my agitation is real, and my words is my bond, in this proposal. My late father diverted these space-credits meant for purchase of ammunition and General Products hulls, for my homeworld, during the peak of disastrous civil war in our planets, now he has deposited the money in the BANK in Tattoine, where I amresiding under political asylum with my mother Mary Many-Tentacles and younger brood sister.

    Now the war in my country is over with the help of Romulan soldiers, the present government of Vulcan has revoked the passport of all officers who served under the former regime and now ask star empires to expel such person at the same time freeze their account and confiscate their asset, it is on this note that I am contacting you, all I needed from you is to furnish me with your bank particulars:

    1) Account name
    2) Account number
    3) Number of tentacles
    4) Enumerated psychic powers that can be used as weapons
    5) Bank address, telephone and fax number, and # of P.O. box on Vogon homeworld.

    For you to assist me transfer these credits your private bank account, the said amount is $17.5 Million or equivalent weight in gold-pressed latinum.

    I am compensating you with 20 % of the total credits, now all my hope is banked on you and I really wants to invest this money in your planet, were their is stability of government, spontaneous mutations Borg colonization, political and economic welfare.

    Honestly I want you to believe that this transaction is real and never a joke. My late father gave me the certificate of deposit issued to him by the BANK on the date of deposit, for you to be clarify because, I do not expose my self to anybody I see, I believe that you are able to keep this transaction secret for me because this money is the hope of my life, it is important."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  48. I predict they will either understand /.'s by syntap · · Score: 2, Funny

    normal language based on misspellings, like "stategy", or will be staunch right-wingers and understand Bush's "strategery".

  49. Desktop Photo by czarangelus · · Score: 1

    A view of our solar system from the most distant planetoid, Sedna. You can get this picture in very high resolution here - it makes an excellent wallpaper for your Windows desktop.

    What if I don't use Windows, you insensitive clod!

    --
    When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
  50. Another CSS Scheme by Port-0 · · Score: 1

    So the aliens are smart enough to pick this particular signal from all the "I Love Lucy", "Dukes of Hazzard" and "CSI" signals. They figure out how to port it to their own hardware, and this guy thinks they won't be able to crack the encryption? Next thing we know, the EIITA (Earth Industry Intergalactic Trade Association) will be notifying them they are taking legal action because "slkdfj&*#$" son of "sdlfs8dr423" is using carbon nano tubes on his model intergalactic star destroyer.

    1. Re:Another CSS Scheme by pg110404 · · Score: 1

      And if these aliens find these shows interesting and start swapping them on their own bittorrent like network, then the MPAA can sue them for copyright infringement.

  51. The only probable way of communicating.... by stuffisgood · · Score: 1

    with aliens that I can see is the flash-card method. Show a picture, and a word, with the word being either spoken or written. Of course this method couldn't possibly work with aliens that don't see as we do, or for unfamiliar objects but the basic principle isn't much different than what would have been used when two new cultures met for the first time.

    1. Re:The only probable way of communicating.... by stuffisgood · · Score: 1

      Point taken, but for 1 way communication (them to us) and them having to be at the intellectual level for us to actually recieve their reply, a flash card system just might do the job.

  52. Never mind the message. Just get their attention. by Arduenn · · Score: 1


    Never mind the content of the message. Just set up a beacon for those aliens who are capable of interstellar travel (and other advanced things) to get their attention. Even better, try something better that lightspeed-limited signaling. Try something using tunneling.

    They'll come us, study us and use our language.

    At least, that's what I would do if I would be interested in talking to an ant on an anthill: just spray some pheromones and see how it responds.

  53. Space Aliens by grafikdude · · Score: 2, Funny

    All your chess belong to us

    --
    This is not here.
  54. Lets just hope... by tussey · · Score: 2, Funny

    they don't see in Bitmap. I just accidentally sent a picture of Goatse up.

    1. Re:Lets just hope... by wed128 · · Score: 1

      What were you doing with a picture of goatse in the first place?

  55. Veronica's Closet by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    You have a good point. I think the planet-busting bombs will be headed our way as soon as they decode and view "Veronica's Closet". Either that, or "Darmha and Greg".

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  56. Re:aliens do not talk. by tb()ne · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a Vonnegut novel (Breakfast of Champions, I think) that talks about a race of Martians that communicate by farting and tap dancing.

  57. neither numbers nor math are universal, power is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Keeping other creatures captive is a sign of intelligence. I remember one SF story I read where 3 people were captured and put in basically an earth zoo. They tried everything to show the aliens they were an intelligent species but everything they tried failed. Finally, once they admitted defeat, they decided to at least make the zoo a bit like home so one of them created a basic cage and caught one of the mice in the zoo to keep as a pet. Once the aliens saw the mouse in the cage they promptly released the prisoners and opened the lines of communication.

    The moral, any idiot can makes noises (speech) or tap out prime numbers (lots of animals can count, at least subconsciously) but only an intelligent species will imprison what they consider unintelligent.

    If anyone knows the name of the short story let me know because I would love to read it again.

  58. Talking to aliens using pictures? by pg110404 · · Score: 1

    Not using the universal language of math, why are they trying to use pictures?

    And what will that picture say? 'Take me to your leader'?

    What if they see that as a declaration of war and attack us? Or a plea for help? What if they interpret that as, 'we want all your unattractive females' and we get overrun by aliens?

    Maybe then I can use this line..... 'Whatever dude; at least you get to do something'...

  59. Knowing Earth by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we'd probably require the Aliens to 'upgrade' (laughably) to a Word® 2005 site license before we can successfuly communicate.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  60. Why bother with trading ? by S3D · · Score: 1

    Let AI just take over their world ! Mwahahaha

  61. This was explored in "An XT Named Stanley" by jakedata · · Score: 1

    This very scenario was explored - with humans on the receiving end - in the book "An XT Named Stanley".

    http://www.sfsite.com/~silverag/daw501-600.html

    A nice computer scientist is called in to build what the alien instruction manual describes. Given cameras and microphones, the gizmo ultimately became self-aware and aware of it's mission. Then the evil government types try to hack into it's mind so it would disgorge all it's information. Stanley manages to beam his findings back to wherever he came from before self-destructing.

    Anyhow, it's a pretty good read - and very reminiscent of this proposition.

  62. maybe... by boeserjavamann · · Score: 1

    ...they are civilized enough not to talk.

  63. Crank Call by hackronym0 · · Score: 1

    Ask them if their refridgerator is running...

    --
    This is completely false. This is not a sig.
  64. Here's how to talk to those aliens.. by Dexter.M · · Score: 1

    Aaa Jaa.. Aaa Jaa Re...

    For the musically inclined:
    D A.. A B G...

  65. Extraterrestrials by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    if ETs did know of us why would they bother with us, we humans can not get along together, we have wars & crime all the time as if it is normal, i bet ET probably has a sign posted on the dark side of the moon saying"

    "DANGER - Do not feed the humans"

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  66. not sure about keeping other creatures captive by La+Gris · · Score: 1

    What about spiders who capture other insects ?
    What about ants who grow other insects inside settlement ?

    --
    Léa Gris
    1. Re:not sure about keeping other creatures captive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spiders? You mean capture for food. No applicable, everything needs to eat.

      As for the ants, you mean capture for slaves, again, not applicable as the slave ants are integrated into the colony as one of their own (ie assimalation)

      The key to the whole story is PET. What other animals keep pets besides humans. NONE. It is a waste of resources in the primal world of pure survival.

      That was the point of the story, the guys kept a pet (much like the aliens were doing to them) so they must be intelligent.

    2. Re:not sure about keeping other creatures captive by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      He might be thinking about the ants that herd and keep aphids. The take the aphids around to plants the aphids feed on. The ants then milk the aphids for their honeydew (a sugary liquid the aphids produce).

    3. Re:not sure about keeping other creatures captive by danila · · Score: 1

      This is actually stupid. Having a pet is not a sign of intelligence. And if you talked to a pet-owner you would realise that very soon. We have pets because it's basically a surrogate child. Parenting love is one of the most basic emotions and we just use a substitute for a child.

      Other animals sometimes have "pets". What about a cat that would treat some puppies as kids - that's a typical pet owner. There are many such examples documented and they are not substantially different from you owning a pet.

      The intelligence lies in our frontal lobes - the ability to reason, to build models, to use imagination, to reason abstractly, etc. Exhibiting typical preprogrammed behaviour is only a sign of intelligence in stupid sci-fi (BTW, I read that story).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  67. I'd like to agree with you, but it's just not true by ianscot · · Score: 2
    Having run into countless tourists in America as a guide at a pretty big modern art museum, I can honestly say that they don't tend to shout. The vast majority of them spoke English quite well, though sometimes there was hesitation in their voice as they dug for the right word. I can't ever remember someone trying to speak French, or Japanese, or whatever r-e-a-l-l-y s-l-o-w-l-y because they thought I'd somehow understand it that way. (Sometimes that would have worked, too.)

    Europeans are, duh, more accustomed to dealing with people who speak another language. Americans mostly aren't, barring Spanish in some spots. Add to that the "lingua Franca" status of English, so that we tend to assume someone has some English. (And again, sometimes it works. Shop children in the Grand Market in Istanbul speak awfully good English, they need it to sell with.) Without bashing American tourists, who are generally cool and curious people, there's something to the stereotype.

    Ordinarily I'd go along with "people are people, we all have our foibles," but that just doesn't match my experience.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  68. The Japanese!!11 by nxtr · · Score: 1

    Let's hope the aliens don't try to intercept Japanese websites with browsers that don't have Japanese language support. They'll think we're a very one confused people.

  69. This has already been covered by captnkurt · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, someone has already done all the work for us.

  70. Communicating with aliens. by Saggi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Communicating with aliens.

    I use to play a game with some friend a long time ago. Basically it was about the concept of communicating with aliens. You create two teams. (And keep one or two persons as referee). Now one team had to come up with the concept of an alien race. They would line up their basic way of living and their primary way of communication. The other team should compose a message and a way of sending it to the other team. The referees would then listen to the two parties and deciding how the communication would work (or not).

    This little game is a good way to explore the issues faced by communicating into space. Sometimes the races would be underwater sea squid-type of monsters the communicated with sound waves. Other times they used tactile or chemical communication. The last is an obvious way of communicating, as most parts of our body uses this way of communication internally.

    Sometimes we would put some special requirements, like the race should have long range communication abilities or should be able to do space travel. The last requirement forced the race team to explain why and how the race would pursue the space quest.

    We always faced the core issue of how to transmit the message. It is obvious to uses certain radio frequencies. (There are some wavelengths that are fairly silent in our universe, that would be obvious to use. But check out some of our attempt to locate alien, like SETI for further references of these).

    To get their attention it would be obvious to send something out of the ordinary. We have looked fore some time into space now, and have a fairly good idea of how things should look. Now anyone interested would pickup anything that would not be familiar. They would then try to determine if it was intelligent (us?) or some new phenomenon. Sending primes would be good. But anything will really work.

    Then the issue as stated in this Slashdot bullet comes next. How to encode the message. Out group quickly found some common issues. If the race communicated with light (sight) they should fairly easy be able to decode an image. Send some basic images, square, circle etc. to define how you have encoded you image. Any intelligent species (and anyone listing to space would probably be), would fairly quickly be able to decode the image. Any race not using sight would probably never decode an image! The same goes for basically all the other weird kinds of communication we came up with. Sound (ears) indicated waves...ect. Basically the message should hold several (identical) encodings of the same message.

    But other issues arose in our discussions. Would it be communication? The answer is no. It would be a one-way message. To do communication would be stupid. Wait 50, 100 or more years to answer? So any kind of "How is the weather over there?". "Do you have a cure for cancer?" (Laugh) - would be really foolish. The message should be a one-way (but might be a long one).

    But what should we send. The most obvious (if images would be used) would be sending an image of a man and woman. (Where did I hear that before). But to any alien this would be completely without any kind of content. What would these two shapes be? The outline of a gas could in space to guide the way. (No they would not like to travel so far). They might be able to guess... this is how the aliens (us) looks like. Many images with this familiar shape. A good guess. But they would never know. Let's say there was images of cars. (I think we have a lot of that kind of images if we send thousands of images to the in order to tell about us. This familiar shape from before? Is it born from this other shape that we sometimes see it inside. Or do the biggie eat the four-pointy thing with the knob? See?

    Try to pick 10-15 images and try to guess what it is if you were an alien? No this was the second part of our two team's effort. How did they interpret the message from the human team? It's a quite funny game, but also quite serious for those who wish to communicate with aliens.

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
    1. Re:Communicating with aliens. by signalgod · · Score: 2, Funny

      You, my friend, are a geek....

      --
      --------------------------------------------- SignalGod ---------------------------------------------
    2. Re:Communicating with aliens. by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      I play a similar game.

      Imagine you are an alien who has just parked yourself in orbit around earth. Where would you land first, and why?

      a) Look at a map, and select the best spot geographically. Why land there? (Australia, large island? Hawaii, small and remote island? Amazon, lots of greenery? Panama, "conduit" between land masses?)

      b) Listen to radio/broadcast noise - select a noisy place, or a quiet place? (Europe, N.America ... or Siberia?)

      c) Look at artificial structures - which indicate the best place to land by? (New York, lots of skyscrapers - Great Wall of China, loooong structure - Pyramids, large and ancient?)

      d) Search for mineral deposits - land in the Middle East for oil? What about gold, diamonds, or even large iron deposits?

      Think like a peaceful alien, like a warfaring alien, like a diplomatic alien, like a resource prospecting alien.

      Where would you land first and why?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  71. Music by jefu · · Score: 1
    Maybe we could get someone to upload a whole boatload of copyrighted music (and movies - the aliens are sure gunna love "The Cat in the Hat") to the universe. Then when they start downloading, the RIAA will find them all and sue them.

    (Parenthetically, I do keep wondering how astronomical distances and times and relativistic effects would affect copyright expiration times. )

  72. How to talk to aliens by KristoferP · · Score: 1

    Why don't we just ask them? They should know, they are probably talking to each other all the time.

  73. Re:Never mind the message. Just get their attentio by ecotax · · Score: 2, Informative

    They'll come us, study us and use our language.

    At least, that's what I would do if I would be interested in talking to an ant on an anthill: just spray some pheromones and see how it responds.


    In that case, given their obvious technological superiority, it's more reasonable to assume that they'll come to us and spray a good deal of pheromones, to see how we respond...

    --
    "Money is a sign of poverty." - Iain Banks
  74. Trading?? by cblomqui · · Score: 1

    If this AI is sent with all the information that we are supposedly "trading", then the aliens already have it... ok, so maybe the AI has some sophisticated translation routine that is required to turn the nuclear fusion reactor plans into Alien, but the data's still there.

    And if they're sufficiently intelligent to intercept our transmissions, decipher out logic-gate data, build an Intel P4 system, install Linux, and run this AI program, then they're probably smart enough to dis-assemble the AI code and figure out out to translate the plans without the help of the AI (or remove the have-they-sent-data-to-earth routine).

  75. Addendum by theolein · · Score: 4, Funny

    It just occured to me that the only way you can make anything, and I mean thing, not person, aware of you is by making a large signal in the form of "yoohoo, hallooo, hey!". In other words by making a very big bang visible over light years in most of the wavelengths of the EM spectrum.

    Maybe blow up Jupiter :D

    1. Re:Addendum by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because if anything is going to make us friends, it's letting them watch us blow shit up real good.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  76. Perhaps you should check your facts... by theolein · · Score: 1

    The nearest stars to our sun, Alpha Centauri A and B, are by far the closest to our sun in terms of light output, size and heat in our interstellar neighbourhood. Both of those two stars could support earth type planets.

    And it's 4 light years away. A very powerful, fusion powered craft, traveling at 10% the speed of light, could reach it in 40 years.

  77. Convergent evolution by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are many instances of so-called "convergent evolution" in nature. Perhaps due to the fact that the laws of physics are (likely) pretty much the same throughout the universe, and that the phylogeny out there is due in part to those laws (two eyes and two ears to see and hear in stereo, nose below eyes and mouth below nose in most creatures, 2 limbs on each side of the body, bilateral symmetry etc.) My conclusion is that perhaps, the way we communicate is *more likely than you think* to be similar to the way a completely independently-developing intelligent race of beings might communicate.

    1. Re:Convergent evolution by nmfa · · Score: 1

      True there are many examples of convergent evolution, but mmany of divergent evolution just on this planet.

      Eyes: Spiders generally have eight, insects are multifaceted and some creatures have none at all. Nothing to preclude any of these in intelligent life. I can imagine a cyclops with bat like sonar: range finding without the need for stereo vision. And then there's the frequency of vision, which on Earth ranges generally from UV to infrared, in some cases with different 'eyes' for different wavelengths.

      Ears: Many animals hear directly via contact as well as by ears (even we can do it) and some use that combined with subsonics for long range communications. And once again total lack of the sense for layout. But there's the large frequency variation from sonar down to subsonics.

      General layout: Some kind of symmetry is generally common, although not always, from purely bilateral to rotational. Relative position and number of limbs, breathing apparatus and eating apparatus varies enormously. It does seem likely, although possibly not essential, that any species capable of communication will have some method of tool manipulation.

      Having disagreed with you so far, I do tend to agree that in many ways similarities of thought may be more common than we think, not forgetting just how divergent even human thought is. But one thing our brains can do is simulate and I expect the same of other technological species as they will almost be necessity I think need to be able to have the same ability. As a result I think both sides should to some extent be able to have some insight into the viewpoint of others.

      NickA

    2. Re:Convergent evolution by Jack+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Thank you! I've been on a physics kick lately and the concept of convergent evolution has been bouncing around my head constantly without the proper terms to describe it. The more I understand about the observed laws of our universe, it seems almost obvious that life erupting elsewhere is more likely to evolve as we know it than not.

    3. Re:Convergent evolution by Canordis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unlikely. Check out the variety of life on earth; it's quite unlikely that intelligence will evolve in humanoid form. The prerequisites for (technological) intelligence are manipulatory organs (hands, tentacles, pseudopods) and sensory organs (ears, eyes, chemical sensors, radio receivers). There's no point in supposing that their organs will be arranged in the same way that ours are! And besides, there's the fact that different planets present different environments and therefore, different evolutionary pressures. Do you think that a methane-breathing, silicon-based, high-gravity lifeform would be anything like us at all?

      --
      I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.
    4. Re:Convergent evolution by 51mon · · Score: 1

      Convergent evolution happens on earth because different species face similar problems because of a common environment.

      i.e. how to graze grass whilst running away predators. How not to oxidise due to all the oxygen in the atmosphere. Keeping warm in the winter, cool in the summer (due to the tilt in the axis). Grass/Oxygen/Orbit...

      Similarly eyes assume visible light, eyes as we know them may not work well with other frequencies of light. Or they may as Douglas Adams discussed humorously live on (in? in the atmosphere of?) a planet with a cloud around it blocking their view of the outside world.

      Whilst I agree there are probably problems common to all animals, and a good number of the planets and satellites in our own system are not so different from earth (although the atmospheres vary a bit).

      Something evolving in the clouds of a gas giant, say, may have some very different challenges - ballast control, pressure changes, dealing with incoming space debris.

    5. Re:Convergent evolution by Solilok · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like cows see in stereo, snakes hear in stereo, and dolphins have the eyes above the nose.

      On the other hand, bilateral symmetry seems handy if you are to move in some non-vacuum.

  78. Stupid article by northcat · · Score: 1

    This is one of the stupidest articles I've ever read. I don't know how this guy became a chess grandmaster.

  79. Eat at Earth by Dareth · · Score: 1

    There's no reason to think that aliens wouldn't find us cute.

    There is also no reason to think that they wouldn't find us TASTY! Or vice versa, we might find them quite delicious, leading to the question, "White or Red wine with Alien?"

    We are listening to them, how loudly are we broadcasting? And does it say "Eat at Earth"?

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Eat at Earth by Kippesoep · · Score: 2, Funny

      To serve man... it's a cookbook!

    2. Re:Eat at Earth by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is also no reason to think that they wouldn't find us TASTY!

      I sort of doubt this... While I am generalizing and admit lack of experience in the matter (it's true... I have no actual experience dealing with other life forms), I feel that:

      1. A natual progression of an advanced species is to grow food instead of relying on hunting it. Any species that is capable of receiving our signal and/or traveling here no doubt has long ago worked out the whole "food" problem.

      2. Humans just aren't a great food source. We are too boney and don't have a lot of meat on us. Even aside from the obvious mental reason why we don't eat other humans, the fact remains that humans wouldn't be able to compete with other animals as a food source regardless. Chickens have a lot of meat on them for their size, can grow quickly, are comparitively easy to raise, keep and control, etc. If aliens were interested in getting food from earth, there is little reason why they too would not look to cows, chicken and fish as well.

      Just my $0.02...

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    3. Re:Eat at Earth by Suidae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another, probably more plausable reason would be that any alien life is likely to use incompatible chemical processes. We would likely be quite unpalatable and possibly even poisonous.

    4. Re:Eat at Earth by Dareth · · Score: 1

      Laugh, yeah I can imagine their version of a nutritionist/physician would definately warn them againts eating too many Americans to prevent heart(s) -type organ disease.

      --

      I only look human.
      My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    5. Re:Eat at Earth by IdleTime · · Score: 1
      we might find them quite delicious, leading to the question, "White or Red wine with Alien?"
      You sir, must be American...
      A wine lover would now that you serve white wine with the fishy-type alien and red wine with the meaty-type alien!

      Geeeezzz... What happened to education?
      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    6. Re:Eat at Earth by WeblionX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably the same thing that happened to your "k" in "know."

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    7. Re:Eat at Earth by 51mon · · Score: 1

      "A natual progression of an advanced species is to grow food instead of relying on hunting it"

      Based on incomplete observation of one species?

      They might eat up all our sunlight, and we'll die from the cold in their shadow.

    8. Re:Eat at Earth by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      Based on incomplete observation of one species?

      And what should my guess about the likelyhood of aliens coming to earth to feast on humans be based on? Should I wait for the hard data to come in from other galaxies before speculating?

      I simply think its pretty logical that space-travelling societies have figured out how to secure food... I can think of some doomsday-like scenarious that might require them to venture out and seek new food... anything is possible. I simply think its far more likely that their contact with us would not be food related - and if it were food-related, that they could find much better sources on earth than humans. Of course, to take our food they would need to kill us... and since we are dead and laying around, they might as well feed us to their spacedogs... so perhaps my point is moot. :)

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
  80. Alien Governments by funkify · · Score: 1

    Alien governments are receiving the earth transmissions, for sure. They just sweep that shit under the rug into their own Area 51.

    Take me to your leader!

  81. How many... by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Primates have you eaten recently.

    1. Re:How many... by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      I haven't, but they do.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    2. Re:How many... by Dareth · · Score: 1

      I was really hoping for some outer space brocoli, but some Cows from Outer Space would suffice...

      Alien - "So nice of you to provide us with a bath, what do you call this substance again?

      Me - "We call it BBQ sauce, mu ha ha ha..."

      --

      I only look human.
      My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  82. This has already been done by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 4, Funny

    The AI program would continually check its own integrity and its ability to modify itself. If these checks failed then it could self-destruct. The aliens would then have to start again with a fresh copy of the program which would, at the least, be irritating.

    Windows 98 used a similar strategy to prohibit productivity. You would be almost done with a word document and the PC would lock tight.

  83. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet of dildos by StandardsSchmandards · · Score: 2, Funny
    They will want to trade with us if we have heavy firepower. It's a status thing, really.

    What evidence is there that Aliens regard firepower as something important? Maybe the aliens fear a giant intergalactic dildo more? To be on the safe side we should do both and put them in orbit immediately.

  84. Waste of time by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    His theory has a LOT of problems with it. First, keep in mind the following. If we find an alien race that at least as advanced as us, chances are, they're WAY ahead of us. This is a matter of probability, but we've only been transmitting for a few decades of our entire history and chances are any aliens out there have been doing it for, at the very least, thousands if not millions of years.

    So, if you take the assumption that they're at least a few decades ahead of us, which is about 99.9999%, then they're going to have no problem deciphering patterns of numbers, as long as they're given some mathematical context within which to frame those patterns. That means raster images will be pretty simple for them to figure out. My guess is that they could feed it into some sort of uber-computer that would analyze the data and spit out an image (or a representation of the image) using whatever their sensory system is adapted to, sound, smell, visual, whatever.

    Next, his AI computer idea is simply ridiculous. Again, you have to assume they're way ahead of us technologically. Any encryption we're likely to use to "protect" the data will likely be broken within a matter of seconds by them. Any programs we right will certainly be analyzed before they actually run them and they'll be able to get around any sort of software protection mechanisms we try to put in place.

    Think about it. Take any program from 20 years ago. Is there any program from 20 years ago that some competent hacker today couldn't compromise within a matter of minutes, maybe hours? You think someone a few million years ahead of us is going to have any problem compromising our current encryption?

    The only way to communicate with them is simply open communications. You start by providing a mathematical and logical basis and build from there. This guy may be a genius, but he doesn't seem to really understand the issues here and I'm no expert, but these are very obvious flaws.

    1. Re:Waste of time by Canordis · · Score: 1
      His theory has a LOT of problems with it. First, keep in mind the following. If we find an alien race that at least as advanced as us, chances are, they're WAY ahead of us. This is a matter of probability, but we've only been transmitting for a few decades of our entire history and chances are any aliens out there have been doing it for, at the very least, thousands if not millions of years.

      Why? How can you suppose that all lifeforms out ther have better technology than us? They've had the same time to appear, evolve, and contruct civilization that we did. There is no reason to believe they're more advanced than us. In fact, ultra-advanced alien civilizations are just Sci-Fi. There is no way we can know how advanced they are. They might be capable of interstellar travel. Or maybe they just split the atom. Or maybe they are living in caves. We just don't know.

      --
      I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.
    2. Re:Waste of time by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of probability. Let's say we've been transmitting 50 years. Let's say that we will continue to be around and technologically advanced enough to do so for say, another 1000 years (though, chances are, if we make it 1000, we'll make it a lot more than that).

      Then the chances of an anyone else catching us in the first 50 years of our ability to transmit are 50/1000 or 5%.

      There's a 50% chance that we'd be at least 500 years more advanced than them.

      Now do it from an alien civilization's point of view. Let's say they survive their technology for 1 million years after they first transmit. The chances of us catching them in their first 50 years are 50/1000000. or .005%.

      You're right, we don't know for sure, but probability says that if we find an alien civilization, then chances are they will be far ahead of us. There is a very small chance that they will be at the same level as us, but that's very, very unlikely. You also have to take into consideration how far away they are. If there more than 50 light years away, then by default, they've been transmitting at least 50 years.

      But people have discussed these probabilities in terms of alien civilization long before I brought them up, and anyone really familiar with the subject is well aware of this.

    3. Re:Waste of time by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      Also, your argument that "they've had the same time to appear, evolve and construct civilization that we did" is faulty as well. It's unlikely that the planet they were evolved on came into being or began to support life at exactly the same time as Earth. Single celled life existed for 2-3 billion years before multi-celled life forms came into being. Multi-celled life has only been around for a few hundred million years. So when you're talking about an evolution of a few billion years, a single event that could speed things up or slow them down by a mere 400 years would make a HUGE difference in terms of technological difference.

      For example, what if the "dark ages" never happened? That was a few hundred years of science being heresy. What if science had actually advanced significantly in that period instead? We might be significantly more technologically advanced now.

      So a small difference on the geological scale can be a HUGE difference on the technological scale.

    4. Re:Waste of time by Canordis · · Score: 1

      My point is that we can't know how advanced an alien civilization might be, not that they're not more advanced than we are. There is no conclusive proof that an alien civilization would forcibly have better and more technology than us. However, an alien civilization that we contact right now would have to be at least as advanced as we are, in order to generate radio signals. On the other hand, there simply isn't enough data for any hypothesis about the biological, cultural or technological developments of alien lifeforms, so for all we know, we might be the advanced civilization.

      --
      I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.
    5. Re:Waste of time by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      ...so for all we know, we might be the advanced civilization.

      And my point is that, statistically speaking, that's about a 1 in a billion chance if we actually do contact an alien civilization. The chances, statistically speaking, almost guarantee that they're ahead of us because we're at the "infant" stage of communicating beyond our planet.

  85. Very old news by SunPin · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how hard is it to catch a story when it breaks? Besides, there are legal limits to how powerful of a signal you can send up. Interested customers would serve themselves better by continuing to chat with the aliens that regularly examine them with the anal probe thingy.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  86. Re:Never mind the message. Just get their attentio by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
    "Quantum tunneling is the quantum-mechanical effect of transitioning through a classically-forbidden energy state. The classical analog is to go through a wall, which happens in the quantum world but not with typical matter." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunneling

    The thing is, the photon traveling through empty space is not a classically-forbidden energy state. There are no walls in outer space.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  87. OK, so they write slightly differently... by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    Why should we care if they read/write right to left or in columns? In the worst case, an image becomes mirrored in two directions (making a b into a p). But, in every code they decipher, it will look like that, making it a valid symbol and just as arbitrary as the one we use.

    1. Re:OK, so they write slightly differently... by 51mon · · Score: 1

      Left/right is an old problem for physicists.

      Asymetries in the weak nuclear force means all we have to do is describe one isotope of cobalt to them, and they can then switch left/right if they got it wrong first time.

      Up/down is fairly easy if they have gravity.

  88. Ah yes by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

    The ever-popular "solution to a problem that doesn't exist." Seriously, why would anyone be wasting time on figuring out how to communicate with aliens when we have NO PROOF that they even exist yet. Let's try spending a little more time figuring out how to stop killing each other first, k?

  89. s/I doubt a system could/no system can/ by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Make no mistake.
    No system can be completely protected purely in software running on untrusted hardware.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:s/I doubt a system could/no system can/ by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Not unless someone can pull a rabbit out of their hat with quantum computing--making it impossible to dissect part of the state without collapsing the rest. Well... Let's wait and see.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  90. What I would do... by cryptocom · · Score: 1

    I've always thought that instead of trying to send messages or whatever, a beacon would be the best bet. This is much more likely to draw a response, since curiosity is an inherent trait even in animals. A very large, very powerful laser emitting at an obviously artificial wavelength, like blue or green for example, could be mounted on a satellite, which could be set in a stationary orbit between Earth and the Sun, and could be set to rotate at a specific rate. This would produce a plainly artifical beacon that would travel fast, be very recognizable, and draw immediate response from a civilization capable of such communication. What we do after we get a response is another matter completely. I honestly don't believe we are ready for that as a species. We can't even communicate effectively with each other.

    --
    It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
    1. Re:What I would do... by cryptocom · · Score: 1

      Mounting the laser on a satellite outside of the Earth's atomosphere would greatly boost the distance the beam would travel. In addition, an analysis of space dust may provide insight into which frequency of light would travel best in such an environment.

      --
      It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
    2. Re:What I would do... by 51mon · · Score: 1

      "curiosity is an inherent trait even in animals"

      Earth bound animals - who share probably at least 60%-80%+ of our genome and 100% of our environment, since I believe carrots are around the 50% mark. Carrots aren't curious as far as I can tell, but maybe I'm not communicating to them in the right way, and they are a lot more similar genetically than aliens are likely to be.

      Curiousity might exist with evolutionary convergence, like many animals have eyes from different evolutionary paths because eyes are an easy and obviously advantagous (well mostly if you have light) adaption, but then it might be a planet with a lot of cave dwelling animals that can kill, and curiosity thus a remarkably unsuccessful strategy unless you are a particularly agressive and unpleasant life form.

      Aliens will be very alien, although as a pan-spermia believer, they might share amino acids with us. The only positive side of which is one group or the other might be processable into food, more cheaply than the rocks.

    3. Re:What I would do... by cryptocom · · Score: 1

      lmao...man, you just made me spill my cheatos.

      --
      It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
    4. Re:What I would do... by cryptocom · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. My only reason for trying to narrow the wavelength would be 1.) to lessen the chances that this would be detected as a natural emitter of radiation, like a quasar or pulsar or whatever, and 2.) to be able to penetrate space dust more effectively because of the distance involved. However, I like your 2-device idea as well. I'm wondering if it might be possible to entangle two particles, and seal one in a probe that is sent out, and keep the other here on earth. When the probe particle is observed, we will know here on earth when we go to observe it's twin, and notice that the properties are different than when we sent it. I'm not too knowledgable on quantum mechanics, so I'm just speculating with layman's knowledge.

      --
      It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
  91. If a /.er contacted aliens... by captnkurt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet this is what would be sent.

  92. Still inside the box by xoboots · · Score: 1

    "It appears likely that the only form of trade possible across interstellar distances is a trade in information, so sending out everything you know is like giving away all your assets to complete strangers. There aren't many humans who would do that, and I don't see why it should be different with aliens."

    On the one hand, he talks about how the current SETI efforts are anthropomorphic and thus unsuitable but then he uses the above reasoning to justify his own solution? Worse, he gets it wrong. How does he explain the free software movement under this analogy?

    His idea is not only anthropomorphic, it is decidedly old world thinking and representative of an early age of development. There is just as much reason to believe that any alien society capable of such communication feats would be beyond the bounds of limited resources and hence property.

  93. good point! by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    You probably work for the Office Of Homeland Security, don't you?

  94. Acid Freak Ahoy! by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Try John Cunningham Lilly, he was the scientist who swam with the dolphins on acid.

  95. nanu nanu by bushboy · · Score: 1

    nanu nanu

    Oh wait, I'm the 103rd person to post that witty repost ! (or compost - something smells, anyway)

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  96. Message Ideas by MMatessa · · Score: 1
    Some message ideas for interstellar communication can be found at http://www.matessa.org/~mike/inter-comm.html

    Most messages start with simple math, then work their way up to geometry, physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, etc.

  97. Re:If there's one thing we've learned from SoapTre by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    Even the klingons don't speak klingon, not since hte first few seasons of TNG. They just grunt out vaguely klingon-like sounds called "Paramount Hol" by those who care about such things...

  98. rudy rucker by lampajoo · · Score: 1

    He stole this idea from rudy rucker. in his *ware(freeware,realware, etc) books he writes about aliens that travel by broadcasting themselves out to the universe and waiting to get decoded and put into a computer/robot. pretty much the same thing and it came out in '97.

  99. Use nukes to make prime number gamma bursts! by Suomi-Poika · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the main problem is that we may be too far away from alien civilizations. I think one good way to announce galaxy-wide that "we are here" is to start blowing nukes in space. Not in low orbit. Our gamma radiation satellites can dial in minutes (or was it in seconds now) on gamma burst sources anywhere in the universe.

    I suppose aliens would be interested in those gammabursts too. Not good if something starts emitting gamma rays too close. So, my suggestion: First burst is a high-yield "Prime", then followed up by a series of smaller nukes so that anyone focusing on our direction sees or hears a couple of primenumbers. That should be next to impossible in universe and we have enough nukes to keep this going yearly for next 1000 years. :) (assuming we broadcast only single-digit primes)

    1. Re:Use nukes to make prime number gamma bursts! by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's really the best way to gain attention, much as wandering around a bad neighborhood loudly banging a sword against a shield or randomly firing a handgun isn't either.

      Advertising "we have so many nuclear warheads that we can explode them for broadcasting a cry for attention" might reasonably attract the /wrong/ kind of attention, if anything's advanced enough to actually detect and respond before one runs out of warheads.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  100. What do we understand? by TuataraShoes · · Score: 1


    There are some intellegent critters on Earth. Take whales.
    How intellegent are they? Well, it's pretty hard to tell.
    Do they use language? Er, we think so, but we're not sure what it means.
    These animals are mammals like us. People can look them in the eye and sense a kind of recognition. Yet we still can't talk with them.

    Now take an animal slightly more different from us, perhaps a reptile. Look that sucker in the eye and there is no real connection. Who the hell knows what he's thinking.

    It seems to me that we have an awful tough time communicating with relatively intellegent creatures even when we've lived side by side for generations and understand each others' environment.

    So if we were to find another civilization out there, its quite possible we could sit with them for 100 years and never know what each other is thinking.

    --
    Surely in vain the net is spread in the sight of any bird -- Proverbs 1:17
    1. Re:What do we understand? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      These animals are mammals like us. People can look them in the eye and sense a kind of recognition. Yet we still can't talk with them.

      Communication is a two-way process. These animals don't really care about communicating with us. We're not really communicating with them, we're eavesdropping.

    2. Re:What do we understand? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that we have an awful tough time communicating with relatively intellegent creatures even when we've lived side by side for generations and understand each others' environment.

      Recently I ran across an interesting observation from a zoologist that might be relevant here. He mentioned that we humans have an interesting characteristic that's highly unusual: We engage in more symbiotic relations than any other known species. Most of them we call "domestication", of course. But his point was that not only have we modified all those species; we were modified in the process. He simply called this characteristic "empathy", and defined it as the ability to understand the behavior of and communicate with other species.

      We think we're not very good at it, but in fact we're better than anything else we know on Earth. The limits are mostly imposed by the other species. And it can take a bit of work and experience.

      Now take an animal slightly more different from us, perhaps a reptile. Look that sucker in the eye and there is no real connection. Who the hell knows what he's thinking.

      This is true because you haven't worked at it. People who raise animals can get to understand those animals quite well. One example I've heard from a number of people is horses. To most people these days, horses are dull, uncommunicative animals. But to people who live with them, they are interesting and communicative animals. Their language isn't human, and they can't really understand our language. But we're unusual; We can learn theirs. We can communicate on their terms.

      I ran across an interesting personal example a year or so back. Someone was writing about birds, and described them as "alien". Their body language is so different from ours, according to this writer, that to human eyes they seem incomprehensible and impossible to communicate with.

      My reaction was "Huh? I know birds that are every bit as expressive as most people, and they communicate easily. What's the mystery about avian body language?" But this was explained by the above zoologist's comments: Due to my wife's allergies to nearly everything furry, I've for several decades shared a house with a number of birds. They're mostly small parrots, which are social animals. This means that they have a lot of social signals, both visual and aural. Birds have individual control over feathers, and social birds can have at least as many facial expressions as we humans with our bare faces. They are 'alien" in the sense that they aren't close relatives, and their signals are utterly different from ours. But we have an empathy adaptation; we can learn their signals. Funny thing about parrots is that they can learn our aural signals easily, but they don't learn our visual signals. But to a person who has lived with them, a parrot's thoughts are written all over its feathers.

      This carries over to other social birds fairly easily. Some time ago, while walking with a group down a street, one guy made a comment about some pigeons fighting. I looked around, saw lots of pigeons, but none were fighting. He pointed at some pigeons, and my reaction was "Huh? They're not fighting." It was obvious to me that one bird was a nearly-grown baby who was demanding food from a parent. The parent equally obviously wanted to wean the baby. To me, and to any other pigeon, their signals to each other were clear, and fairly similar to what I'd seen in our birds. The "fight" was the adult trying to fend off the baby. To the other guy, none of this was obvious, and it was just an aggressive interaction.

      I had a friend in junior high who had a pet tarantula. It rode around on his shoulder. The two of them could obviously communicate, though it was a mystery to the rest of us. He would play with the critter in ways that none of the rest of us would dare. He did admit that the spider wasn't really all that smart, just smart enough that they could tell each other a few things. But talk about an alien

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:What do we understand? by TuataraShoes · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I appreciated your thoughful reply.

      --
      Surely in vain the net is spread in the sight of any bird -- Proverbs 1:17
  101. Re:If there's one thing we've learned from SoapTre by Meumeu · · Score: 3, Funny

    the technology even makes sure they move their mouths as though they were pronouncing words in English too..

    That's because the translator is messing not only with the ears, but also with the eyes, that way, if you're deaf, you can still read on their lips...

  102. slingshot by zpok · · Score: 1

    put some iPods in space, go to relativistic speeds by using the reality distortion field and make some aliens happy (or put them into another ice age...)

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  103. Talk to aliens ?... by kid+nickng · · Score: 1

    Just use PERL!

  104. The answer is by aztektum · · Score: 1

    pr0n ... lots and lots of pr0n.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  105. Why are we lower than oatmeal? by LadyVirharper · · Score: 1
    Seriously, what's up with everyone going, "Oh, since we're hardly advanced, the super-advanced aliens will never take notice of us!" I don't get the logic behind that. Just because you have a superiority complex over those stupider than you are, being a smart nerd and all (ha), doesn't mean aliens, if there are any out there, feel the same way...that is, if we are stupider than them in the first place.

    Of course, it also doesn't mean you might not be right, maybe we are the dummies of the universe, but I think it's more that some of you guys have been watching too much bad sci-fi tv. Go read some book sci-fi...it's a lot better, or at least a lot more thoughtful.

    If life is so scarce in the universe, and the alien species was social and tool-making like us, I think they might be very curious about us. Undoubtedly if we ever get to the stars our xenobiologists will be fascinated by alien life. How that curiosity would interact with their social and cultural and political bonds, I don't know...they as a species might take a stance to ignore us much like the USA has decided to war in Iraq even though some citizens of the USA might not want that, but individualy...it should be interesting.

    Alien life will probably be weird and wild, as their ancient ancient ancestors will have diverged, or risen independantly, from ours (their very cells may be very different), but all life is driven to reproduce, and you will have parallel behaviors that are understandable by us that help the alien life reproduce and carry on living. So it's not like everything will be uncomprehendable by mere human mortals. It will be different, yes. But not utterly beyond our comprehension like something god-like.

    The biggest hurdle will be if their primary senses are ones we don't have...take some types of snakes--they have pits on their faces that sense heat. Our skin senses hot and cold, but not specifically. Or if their senses don't sense the same wavelengths as we do--ie, if they speak and hear vastly higher or lower sounds than we do, we might miss a few times before we realize that (or they might miss a few times with us) they are saying or hearing something. Same for vision--if they see infrared or ultraviolet instead of visible light, there will have to be some adjustments made to understand things. These are the way we take in information, and there are some very basic things built into all human societies around our specific senses and how much we rely on each one. It's not a stretch to think alien society will act in part based on their main senses and ways of taking in info from their environment.

    But our scientists detect things they can't hear with their original senses unaided, using instruments to color-code things and record things they can't see or hear, so it's safe to say (I think) that alien society should be able to do the same, else they wouldn't be anywhere scientifically.

    So...I guess I'm saying it's not as big a hurdle or problem as people think it will be. Alien life won't be some mystical voodoo like people are making out. (Seriously, lay off the sci-fi tv and think for yourselves.) There's a lot of factors to think about here, that would change depending on what sort of aliens you're trying to communicate with. But assuming that we are face-to-face with them, you just apply the scientific method. Or get some good animal behaviorists and human anthropologists to work together on it. The details will depend on the specific alien encounter.

    I could say a lot more on this, I've not covered nearly everything that would be involved in this and have made broad assumptions that I know someone will pounce on saying, "Nuh uh! What if--", but whatever. :)

    The aliens-as-gods thoughts were starting to annoy me.

    (I just got a good idea for my sci-fi novel, though. Thanks, Slashdot!)

  106. That's a fairly common line of thought by jd · · Score: 1
    The argument is not just that any intelligent life will have an understanding of prime numbers and other simple mathematical principles, but that it is possible to represent them in a way that no natural phenomenon could ever produce.


    It matters little that there's no real information content. The information is not in the content. The information is in the fact the signal exists at all.


    Carl Sagan used prime numbers as the "getting your attention" part of a signal by aliens, in his novel "Contact". (If you've only ever seen the movie, the book is actually better in many ways.) I'm sure plenty of others have described the same method.


    Actually, any alien worth their salt wouldn't bother with such primitive methods of detecting intelligent life. What you need is a radio telescope aray about 1 mile in diameter. This would give you a resolution high enough to see an Earth-sized planet at a distance of 1 AU from its sun, at a distance of 100 light-years with a resolution of about 2x2 pixels.


    That would be ample for you to look at the absorbtion frequencies of the atmosphere. Each molecule absorbs a unique frequency. Both life and industry generate large quantities of highly unstable molecules, so by looking at the absorbtion pattern it should be possible to determine the extent of life and whether it has developed an industrial base.


    Once a planet with life and industry is located, you then simply start scanning frequencies for non-random signals. At this point, Earth fails the test and they move on*.


    *NASA actually carried out the experiment and that really is the result they got.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  107. Knowing what I know by aztektum · · Score: 1

    If I were an alien species that studied humans for a while I would come to the conclusion that I'd have been better off if someone said to me at the beginning, "Move along."

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  108. What do we want to hear? by displague · · Score: 1

    If an advanced species exists (perhaps one example in our own solar system), then it is likely given the size of the universe that another does, and another, and so on. At some point, it seems to me, some of these advanced critters may have met and decided on a method of communication across the stars.

    And so, I would expect communications of the "sub-space" sort must be all around us. We just need to find the right medium to tune in to. My internal conclusion was that this medium is probably very saturated with information, and we are probably bombarded with it daily, completely taken for granted as natural phenomena.

    I don't think our space neighbors will be chatting to their gallatic buddies at 100 million years per line.

    --
    Marques Johansson
  109. Or, in the words of another wise man: by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.

  110. MOD PARENT UP by JohnOfBorg · · Score: 1

    The parent AC gives an example that should have been in TFA.

  111. A better message format... by terristen · · Score: 1

    $end Th3 ME55A9E 1N LEet 5pe4K! 1+ wOrk$ iN W0W

  112. and the unintentional comedy award goes to.... by beamin · · Score: 1

    0x461FAB0BD7D2

  113. drivel by vladrac25 · · Score: 1

    useless drivel Send AI to the aliens !! Here is an answer for any question out there Answer it with a solution that you don't know how to construct answer a question with another question!!!

  114. reverse engineering by sick_soul · · Score: 2, Insightful
    from TFA:
    This brings us on to the question of trading information. The AI would be programmed with a long list of items of information, together a brief summary of what each involves and how much it is 'worth'. The aliens could then supply a similar list and the AI could trade item for item.
    When a trade is agreed, the AI releases the item, while the aliens convince the AI that they have transmitted their item to Earth.
    Then the article presents two objections which are just one: reverse engineering. All the proposed solutions in the article (self-modification, autocheck - self destruction, ...) have been tried in vain here, why should they work there?

    He who has the code and the data has the full power.

  115. why radio? by delong · · Score: 1

    One problem I have with our attempts to communicate and listen for alien signals - what are the chances of a sufficiently advanced space-faring civilization still using the radio spectrum? Using radio to communicate may probably be the equivalent of semaphores to an advanced civilization.

  116. Duh by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) Create an AI and email it to aliens
    2) ???
    3) Profit!

    All kidding aside, this article is lame. Starting from the premise of an AI is - how should I put this? - poop. At this point, presuming that we can create AI (computable on a Turing machine, no less) is no more plausible than finding aliens to communicate with.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  117. Low Tech's More Reliable by ralphcringely · · Score: 1
    Rather than broadcasting rows and columns of dots, we should get our images to the ailens by putting them as a 4 x 6 glossy in an envelope left in the center of a crop circle.

    Maybe mark the envelope "For The Aliens" on the outside -- so humans wouldn't accidentally take it.

    --
    Tell me again, who knew Mary was a virgin, and how did they know?
  118. Re:neither numbers nor math are universal, power i by Savant · · Score: 1

    Rings a bell, I suspect it could be one of Van Vogt's. I'll check my book of his short stories when I get home tonight; if I'm right, I'll post a followup.

  119. Re:neither numbers nor math are universal, power i by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 1

    I remember that story too! I dont remember the title, but Im pretty sure it was written by Robert Sheckley

    Great satirist and pre-cyberpunk writer!

  120. Alien like - what? by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    'Alien intelligence'

    What does that mean? For example, whales or dolphins in the ocean that communicate with clicks and sub-audio rumbles that we don't understand as communication?

    Communication with intelligence not from this planet? There is no evidence that this kind of intelligence exists, outside of science fiction, so is it a rhetorical question as to how to communicate with it.

    Or, - the only real aliens that we seriously need to communicate with. Getting your truck stopped at gunpoint in the third world (like the on Baghdad - Mosul road or 200 kilometers south of Lima) and trying to convince the bunch of cold, wide-eyed 18-year-olds with AK-47s NOT to just kill you and leave your body off the side of the road.

    Especially when they speak some language that you've never heard of and don't consider you to be a human being anyway.

    This is the only situation where 'alien' communication skills becomes a matter of importance. It's the kind of thing that Americans should learn in school, instead of Algebra. After all, you are a lot more likely in the future to be held at gunpoint by the side of the road by 'aliens' than you are to ever use algebra.

  121. Re:Koko the gorilla has pets by ari_j · · Score: 1

    I think the key is that pet-keeping is strong evidence of intelligence, but not per se proof of the trait. Just like seeing a red house is strong evidence that it was painted red, it isn't proof on its own that the house actually is painted red because the lighting might be chromatic, you may be viewing it through a filter, your definition of "red" might not be correct, or any number of other causes may interfere with your ability to ascertain the truth of the statement "That house is painted red."

    Keeping a pet is evidence of intelligence, but it takes more to prove the trait, including proof that keeping a pet is an activity undertaken only by intelligent beings. The science fiction story referred to by the ancestor comment only says that the superior race opened lines of communication after witnessing the evidence of human intelligence in the form of keeping a pet mouse. Surely the communication itself eventually would prove or disprove that intelligence.

    By the same token, the inability to spell "intelligence" and "gorilla" or to appropriately capitalize the latter and punctuate a sentence suggesting that the former is a trait of the latter is itself only evidence of unintelligence. It would take more to prove it.

  122. Vector graphics? I don't think so... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
    It seems highly illogical to imply that any species would process visual information by using our human-created system of vector analysis to process mental images. The whole concept is ludicrous.


    "Vector images are made up of many individual, scalable objects. These objects are defined by mathematical equations rather than pixels.", if I may quote a website that speaks about Vector graphics. The important part here to note is that vector images on a computer are feasable because the computer has, readily available, direct access to those equations and objects.


    So is the author implying that aliens are performing complex mathematics to generate the equations to produce these images on the fly? If they have access to the information that they need to begin turning what they see into vector images, they already have the information that they need to generate visual data directly. I highly doubt that this concept of some kind of naturally evolved vector graphics computation in the minds of some species is (A) feasable or (B) practical. Practicality rules it out on a Darwinian level, and feasability rules it out because it just doesn't make sense.


    The truth is that the visual images we see are not "calculated" in any of the ways that the author describes. We don't work like a computer, because we have a system that processes it much more effectively. Our neural network is reading the impulses of light that reflect off of object directly (through use of our eyes). It doesn't make sense to describe that information in terms of "bitmaps" or "vectors", and it would be bizzare and unnatural for any species to perform additional computation on that light data just so that it can fit into our strange and human-made notion of computer graphics.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  123. A 44-year-old idea by ToSeek · · Score: 1
  124. Re:Sufficiently Advanced Minds... by benjamin_pont · · Score: 1

    I think the "sufficiently advanced minds" that Suso refers to will see the human race's ultimate value to them as being:

    A.) A fun family pet to keep in a cage.

    B.) A lifeform to conduct scientific and/or medical experiments on to advance knowledge which will be of benefit to them.

    C.) Tasty food.

    See? Aliens aren't so different from us after all.

    But this comment may fall into the off-topic catagory of: "What do we not want to hear?" ;)

  125. That's Easy!!!! by wickedj · · Score: 1

    Bah weep granna weep ninny bah! (errrr... not responsible for bad memory, bad pronunciation or bad anything else, but you get the idea.)

  126. Stupid ass idea. by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

    The beauty of trading information with a distant alien race is:

    1.Information is free to copy, so there is no cost to sending real information.
    2.If you cheat and send fake info they might cut you off, even if you send real info later.
    3.They are so far away it can almost never hurt you to tell them what you know, since even if they were inclined they couldn't hurt you.
    4.They will know the above because however bad their system of government/whatever they have to decide what to transmit, however bad it is, it has to be better than ours. This isn't really that much of a suprise if you happen to know that we have the worst possible of all governments, the kind that is willing to build weapons that can kill virtually everyone on the planet, then only take half hearted measures to prevent insane nations from developing them. It becomes obvious why there are no alien signals when it is possible to build something so destructive with basic rudiments of technology.

    So this idea, besides being really stupid and solving nothing, is even more anthropomorphic than sending images (which are 2 dimensional patterns, which any being which can move in at least 2 dimensions can be safely able to abstractly comprehend if worth talking to). It solves nothing because the AI still has to talk to them somehow, so back to square one.

  127. Are we really able to communicate? by zornorph · · Score: 1

    We can't even have a proper conversation with the animals of this planet, where we are supposedly many orders of magnitude more intelligent... what makes us think we can effectively communicate with anyone outside of humans?

    --
    http://bike.stu.ph/rides - free GPS routes available for Garmin, Magellan, GPX and Google Earth
  128. Re:We Need an Intergalactic Fleet of dildos by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    Giant Space Dildoes with Frickin Lasers in their foreheads? The 50's just don't go away, do they?

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  129. Shazbot! by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

    Nanoo, Nanoo!

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
  130. Yes we can. by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    Humans are animals.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  131. Outsourcing to Aliens too? Sh8t by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I sure hope someone figures out how to talk to aliens sometime soon. I keep asking the IT guys to fix my computer, but I've not yet gotten a response.

    Get a remote-controlled robot and have it fixed from India.

  132. Or what if by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    they only talk Macintosh

  133. What about two entangled particles? by cryptocom · · Score: 1

    I dont have an extensive knowledge of how this works, but I have read that you can entangle two particles with the same "spin" or properties, then if one particle is observed, it will automatically change the other particle. Would it be possible to seal one entangled particle in a probe and send it out with a solar sail for propulsion, and keep the other entangled twin here? We could periodically check the status of the particle, and when we observe it change states from our observation, we would know that it's twin had been observed.

    --
    It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
  134. Alien Pr0n? by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    It would be funny if aliens considered reruns of I Love Lucy and the Honeymooners as pr0n, don't you think?

    If that's the case, we'll only hear from them if we stop broadcasting the shows!

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
    1. Re:Alien Pr0n? by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
      If that's the case, we'll only hear from them if we stop broadcasting (I Love Lucy and the Honeymooners as alien pr0n)!

      Look, if the cost of communicating with aliens is the loss of our humanity, then I for one say our alien overlords should be sent to Tunguska!

      Oh wait, I've messed up my temporal coor^H^Hotgrits^Hrooc lar...(NO CARRIER)

    2. Re:Alien Pr0n? by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      It would be funny if aliens considered reruns of I Love Lucy and the Honeymooners as pr0n, don't you think?

      having written what I wrote yesterday, I was watching TV last night and wondered what the aliens are going to make of all the adverts for bathroom cleaners and so on. There is one on UK TV at the moment with this magnified animated bacterium played as a gangland boss - and of course he gets snuffed at the end.

      We're sending out alien snuff porn!

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    3. Re:Alien Pr0n? by muizenkatten · · Score: 1

      Maybe, they want to talk to us, too. They don't know how to say, in which language ??

  135. Just talk slower and leave out words by DoctoRoR · · Score: 1

    That works for me. Whenever I encounter someone from a different country or culture, I talk real slow and loudly and leave out every third word and gesture a lot. It seems to work, so I figure extraterrestrial aliens will be the same.

  136. Re:neither numbers nor math are universal, power i by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keeping other creatures captive is a sign of intelligence.

    No it isn't. Spiders, termites, fish, many kinds of snake, bears, great cats, various kinds of bacteria and two kinds of creature in Angband keep other things captive.

    Trapping something is a sign of cunning. Cunning is not intelligence. Hunting animals all have cunning.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  137. Think about it this way... by Bad-JuJu-Man · · Score: 1

    As far as communicating with other species, we really suck. Really suck bad. We haven't learned to communicate with a single other species on this planet. Those we do communicate learned to communicate with US. Seriously, chimps, gorillas, hell, your average Golden Retriever has learned to communicate with US, not the other way around. Even my dog is better at it than we are. My dog understand some 15 or so words at least. I havent figured out a single damn bark/growl/whine yet. Not with any specificity. So, maybe the aliens have looked at us and decided we aren't capable of communicating with them, and so...don't even want to bother. Maybe we just can't for some biological or developemental reason.

    --
    ""I don't see an obvious biosynthetic pathway from allicin (CH2=CHCH2SS(=O)CH2CH=CH2)to isothiocyanates (R-N=C=S) ""
  138. Carl Sagans' by can56 · · Score: 1

    theme in "Contact" is still the best way of
    communicating (one-way) with alien civilizations
    via C (the speed, not the language).

    Transmit "I Love Lucy", or whatever, using your
    current method of choice (RF, UHF, X-Rays) to
    get their attention. Then broadcast a message
    with the blueprints of the neatest/scariest stuff
    you can.

    If they can decipher the primer, the grad students
    can do the rest. However, it may take a few eons
    before we receive a reply, or friendly visit ;-)

  139. Von Neumann probes by Heliode · · Score: 1

    I think our best hope is to send Von Neumann probes in a couple of directions; 'smart', self-replicating machines that, upon arival and after 'reproduction' using native resources, establish themselves on the moons of the various planets of the systems, sending out signal pulses and waiting to be discovered by a native species. (like the monoliths in 2001: A Space Odyssey)

    Until we're able to create such machines, though, I guess we'll just have to broadcast stuff and hope someone cares and can make sense of it all.

    --
    Fox can take the sky from you.
  140. Is this a sensible thing to do anyway? by XSpud · · Score: 1

    We broadcast spam to billions of nodes and we don't even have a firewall to protect us from a DOS attack on service Earth.

  141. Re:Communicating with aliens is a bad idea... by 51mon · · Score: 1

    We could take a tip from the Andaman Islanders, believed to be alive and well because they fired bows and arrows at the helicopters used by the US millitary in the Tsunami rescue work.

    They resisted all contact, and eventually traded some socialogical information for food. Apparently when pig is plentiful they eat pig, and when pig is scarce they fish. Now that has to be worth a mango.

    I think the trade idea is interesting, but if they are so far removed direct contact is unlikely, then by withholding information that might be socially useful to them might be seen as selfish.

    i.e. if they withhold the cure for cancer for 50 years, till we tell them the secret of teflon, would we look on them lovingly, after they have traded us the prints for the new inter-stellar drive?

  142. The language we know best by Striker770S · · Score: 1

    guns. Yes lets just start shooting up the place once we meet them. I mean hell if we shoot up our own kind so much, what makes us think that a species that defies most religious ideas and peoples morals are going to change that. It may be a couple weeks, but most likely (probably 99% odds) we would engage in war because of the religious fanatics. I mean the leader of the wealthiest and most weapon-stocked nation in the world strictly believes in his religious teachings. And we thought a lot of innocent lives were lost in the crusades...

    --
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes. - Catcher in the Rye
  143. A note on prior art: A For Andromeda by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    The argument in TFA is to send the details of a trading machine out so that the other civ can build it. If anyone has read (or old enough like me to have seen the TV series) A For Andromeda this tells of the receipt of a message with designs for a computer, the same scenario is played out in detail. Its purpose is not revealed, it is assumed it is here to help, but there are sinister overtones. The story is never about black and white issues, always trying to guess the motivations of an alien civilisation. An extremely good story about SETI. Then imagine that the details are not received by us but by someone else, how much will THEY trust the machine. Will it have ulterior motives.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  144. Lincos by xihr · · Score: 1

    There is a completely different approach to pictoral messages, which I think is actually much more promising. Instead of trying to communicate by drawing pictures, it just consists of a sequence of symbols indicating different concepts and ideas, starting with basic mathematics and moving its way on up. A great deal of repetition and examples are used, with cross-referencing and more generalized examples, in order to help make the meaning clear. Freudenthal put this together in a book called Lincos .

    As a flagship example, and then offered with no explanation whatsoever to a group of volunteers who tried to decipher it. Given that the alien civilization that was modeled here was quite different from our own, it is surprising how much of the message was deciphered by the participants. (Oh, and Lincos-like messages can easily encode pictoral-type messages in themselves, just as the Contact Project showed.)

  145. Interesting idea, but software != magic by cgreuter · · Score: 1

    It's an intriguing idea, but this guy clearly thinks software is magical. Specifically, he misinterprets the Church-Turing thesis to mean that aliens will have no trouble running our software. That's wrong.

    Church and Turing say that it's possible to write an emulator for any computer to run on any other computer (modulo stuff like performance and storage). That doesn't mean that there's anything universal about how we represent our programs.

    He also proposes the rather silly idea that the negotiation AI basically use DRM to keep the aliens from finding its secrets. If the program contains encrypted data that it can decrypt, the aliens can decrypt it too, simply by watching how the program decrypts the data.

    That being said, I have to add that it's an interesting idea. CPU opcodes have nice, well-defined behaviour and it may be easier to communicate their meanings than something more abstract. Also, a working computer program would certainly be better at some kinds of communication such as, e.g., the chess program he mentioned.

    On the other hand, suppose you've sent them a program that negotiates an information trade. How would they know that the program is negotiating a trade and not, say, just a more boring SimCity clone?

    We may be able to communicate by software but I don't know if that can extend to sentient-being communication.

  146. Re:neither numbers nor math are universal, power i by datskos · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are referring to Slaughterhouse-five by Kurt Vonnegut.

  147. Hydrogen Wall by wwind123 · · Score: 1

    The idea of sending an AI to communicate with aliens, or communicating with alien AIs that we received, is exactly the same as what Gregory Benford wrote in "Hydrogen Wall" in Asimov's SF Magazine, Oct/Nov 2003. A review of which can be found here. Trading some information for some other information is but a minor task of those alien AIs: they have much grander motivations, which you wouldn't expect until near the end of the story. That's a great story, in fact one of the best hard science fiction stories I've read in recent years. I wonder if John Nunn has heard about the story somewhere, do did he come up with this idea independently?

  148. Heaven and Hell by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

    Just send Cortana and Guilty Spark.

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

  149. Trinity bomb by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    The moment we started testing atomic bombs is the moment we really started to see in influx of UFOs and even the Roswell event. I can only suspect that converting sythetic mass (Plutonium cannot be found in nature) to energy caused a unique signature at the quantum level. Basically, it acted as a beacon that could have been picked up instantly by some Alien technology hundreds of light years away.

    Rumor has it, because India and Pakistan detonated their bombs, we have yet another influx of UFO activity.

    Strange, bazzare, and even FUD. But interesting none the less.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  150. craigslist by saichele · · Score: 1

    Every time I post a craigslist ad I broadcast to outerspace. guess I should build some better AI into my posts before I go soliciting aliens. : p

  151. Wrecked mind by mattr · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately this reportedly amazing mathematical mind has been completely contaminated by the corporate twitspeak of the richest man of the late 20th century.

    To imagine that a culture most likely hundreds of thousands to millions of years older than us would 1) have trouble deciphering a bitmap, 2) be happy to get a copy of Clippy with DRM, or 3) think generously toward us after that, is so stupid I think you have to wonder how many minds this patenting/copyrighting/EULAing/lawyering culture has utterly warped and destroyed.

    An AI might be useful, especially if we have a starship we need one to drive it. Maybe to figure out how to talk to them and plead our case (better be a good AI, might be more of a human personality in silicon, no?). Aliens might be interested in what we look like and our concepts/works of beauty, maybe interstellar photographs from where we are, or measurements of physical constants here. Maybe just because there are not that many intelligent species in the galaxy. But they do not want to be given a copy-protected CD, they certainly can crack it, and the notion offered by this "grandmaster" is probably the MOST POISONOUS one you could possibly send to outer space. Hope instead they send us an AI and we can figure it out.

    Honestly this guy is terminally ridiculous. Of course the idea of an AI itself isn't dumb, it's been in science fiction enough. Trying to think of useful things to trade isn't dumb either. It is the utter egotism the rest of the article displays. Reason enough for a punitive gamma ray burst nearby maybe too!

  152. Non-human beings are communicating with us now ... by ackLoid · · Score: 1

    It is simply a matter of accepting it. Much like when a subject comes up that the "superior" mind has prejudiced opinions about, certain "truth" is missed. So, too, we will miss anything trying to communicate to us that is outside our determined sphere of beliefs. The harder you look, the more it proves you are missing the obvious...

  153. It's been done for Earth ;-) by jc42 · · Score: 1

    Once a planet with life and industry is located, you then simply start scanning frequencies for non-random signals. At this point, Earth fails the test and they move on*.

    Heh. Actually, an interesting paper on the topic was published in Science back in January 1978. You probably need a subscription to read it. The title is "Eavesdropping: The Radio Signature of the Earth" by W.T.Sullivan III, S.Brown, C.Wetherill. Maybe I should nab a copy of the paper and put it online somewhere ...

    To summarize, they considered the radio signal of Earth as it would appear to a remote radio astronomer listening in at various latitudes. They assumed that no content could be decoded; only the radio spectrum was measurable. The idea was that the aliens had technology roughly comparable to our own, and could record our signal over time, and analyze it. They calculated that the spectrum of several hundred of our broadcast stations could be reliably measured out to at least 25 light years, and 250 light years for the military radar.

    Their conclusions were interesting. For example, the usual doppler effects, plus knowing the size and mass of the sun, gave the Earth's orbit and the fact that we have a large satellite.

    But the fun part is based on the fact that our strong radio signals (military radar and commercial television) are strongly directional, with most of the energy going out horizontally. So the remote astronomers would receive mostly signal from the Earth's limb. Broadcasts use narrow frequencies, so a particular station would appear in the spectrum very briefly and fade. 12 hours later, most of them would reappear, slightly doppler shifted up or down. Then 24 hours later (23:56 actually), the original frequency would appear. They now know our rotation period, and from the amount of the doppler shift, the planet's radius can be calculated. This will depend on the station's latitude, of course, and the max is the actual radius of the planet.

    Over a period of a year, a collection of the broadcast stations can be collected, and when they are detected gives their longitude. We know latitudes from the doppler shifts. So we have a rough map of the broadcast stations. One thing that stands out in this map is that the planet has two kinds of surfaces, and almost all the stations are on the smaller of these. From the planet's orbit and the sun's brightness, we infer that it's a world with liquid water. The fixed positions of the stations (determined over several years) tells us that the stations are on land, which is roughly 1/4 of the planet's surface; the other surface is ocean. The stations are clustered strongly on the boundary, so the planet's advanced species is a land animal that likes to live near ocean shores.

    To quote a summary paragraph:

    After several years of careful monitoring of the intensity and frequency variations of several hundred stations, the observer could deduce (i) the complete orbit of the earth; (ii) the existence of station broadcast schedules influenced by the sun; (iii) the presence of an ionosphere and perhaps even a troposphere; (iv) the size, rotation rate, and axis of rotation of the earth; (v) a complete map of the stations; (vi) the mass and distance of the moon; (vii) the size of the radiating antennas; and (viii) various cultural inferences concerning our civilization.

    It's an interesting read. I wonder if anyone has done a similar study since then? Google finds 21 matches for the article's title, but they all seem to be bibliographic references. It could be interesting to dig into some of the matches and see what else turns up.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  154. Gladly do I inhale your alien stink... by Randym · · Score: 1
    ...I find it disgusting yet majestic. With joy and honor, I expel my living odor in your general direction.

    First Conscent
    The Malordians to the Earthians, c. 2205 AD
    If we seriously consider the anthropic principle, we find that humans, like all other DNA-based lifeforms, *communicate* by some sort of chemical expression: scent, in a word. (Having now evolved other, more precise, air-based communication techniques, we now use it largely only for sexual reproduction purposes. But is indubitably still present.) For many species, it is their primary social communication mechanism.

    Therefore, logic dictates that the large-brained bipeds whom we shall inevitably meet will *probably* use some form of this, and we must quickly adapt, or risk being seem as 'inhuman' (so to speak.)

    As the Mals say, "No scents; nonsense."

    (Fortunately, humans possess an adult sub-group that is uncannily attuned to scent: I refer to the "schizophrenics". Their sensitivity to odor is well-documented. Let's make sure we have a few on board every spaceship that goes out there. Seriously.)

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.