Slashdot Mirror


Inside Look at Pixar HQ

LittleGuernica writes "Aintitcool's moriarty has taken a tour of Pixar's Headquarters in Emeryville, California and it just looks astounding. It instantly makes you wanna work there, or at least pimp up your cubicle... Which they don't have at Pixar, no they have cottages! Looks like Pixar created the optimal work condition for such a creative company, which leaves you no choice but to enjoy your job at Pixar every damn minute you work there."

308 comments

  1. great by R.D.Olivaw · · Score: 4, Funny

    as if I didn't hate my workplace enough already.

    1. Re:great by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can remember a similar story from when I was in the navy.

      Ship's captain had a policy that as long as the work for the day was done, the dept head could let folks leave for the day. Of course people on watch had to stay overnight, etc. but that was routine.

      One day, when I was on watch, a guy comes over right after lunch, from another ship, looking to speak with someone about some parts. He was told that the guy he was looking for was gone for the day. The poor bloke was puzzled as to why the guy was gone for the day, until the above was explained to him. Then he was totally bummed, because it was obvious that he was assigned to "the wrong ship"

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    2. Re:great by pentalive · · Score: 2, Informative

      At least you have a job :^\

      Anyone need a linux / novell admin?

    3. Re:great by lewp · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm willing to wager Senior Cocksucker at Pixar would be a step up for many of the folks here.

      Not me, though. I rather like my job.

      (Though I hear Steve is huge. Rawr.)

      --
      Game... blouses.
    4. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. No one needs a "Linux/Novell admin," because it's not 1997 any more. Everybody has long since switched to Macs, and system administration is a dead profession.

      Go learn After Effects or Final Cut or something.

    5. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably do. They are looking for a Render Farm Sysadmin... Seems they use Linux!

    6. Re:great by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, they got /.'ed. I was at Pixar when they were working on a Bug's Life. They had insects pinned all over the walls at that time. Their primary render machines at that time were Sun 4000's housed in cool computer room. The machines were all racked up very neatly in a room with a glass wall, with the lights turned off all you saw were lots neat rows of blinking lights. It was cooler than where Disney was working on Mulan, that place was just confusing.

    7. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Olivaw! This is your boss, we've been reading your web traffic. Guess who's cleaning the customer toilets with Bob tomorrow??

    8. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who worked at Pixar and other studios, let me tell you not to believe the hype.

      I've never seen a more caste ridden company than Pixar. Things are fine if you are "brahmin" (animators/creative side), but hell if you are "untouchable" (production support/systems/facilities/etc.) Jobs repeatly insulted the people on the support (non-production) side... to their faces in company meetings.

      Steve Jobs wanted nothing to do with the company prior to the success of Toy Story and tried to unload the company a year before Toy Story came out. He didn't even have an office in at Pixar until after Pixar became a success. (Seems like I've read that he did a similar thing with the Mac... take credit after the fact.)

      Not only that, when he did get an office Jobs kept on his desk an 8 by 10 color glossy photo of ... himself!

      It is not surprising that in 1998 someone on the inside emailed to every employee the salaries of every employee, and did so the day yearly reviews were being done. Many found out that day that they were grossly underpaid. There were very many unhappy people. Pixar tried to quash the info, filing suit against unamed parties, but never found the guilty party. I wonder if he/she still works there?

      Again... don't believe the press kit. Pixar is great for work for if you are on top, otherwise...

    9. Re:great by pentalive · · Score: 1

      why? So I can create copyrighted works that will have their copyright violated?

  2. isn't the by bugsmalli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    CEO position open or something. Maybe they can use some new overlords now that disney is no longer in the animation...

  3. pimp up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the correct term is pimp out

    1. Re:pimp up? by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


      It's a hackneyed, slang term that only appeared recently. There is no "correct" way.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:pimp up? by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      "pimp out" = recent? What's your definition of recent? 10+ years to me is not recent. I'm sure the term has been used for longer than that too.

    3. Re:pimp up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's just a retarded slang term. There's no set-in-stone usage policy.

  4. Treating employees like human beings? by FlyByPC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a concept! Wow!

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey, common you can treat people like crap, they'll do a good job in return and not just the absolute minimum! Honest!

      Keep in mind during the dotcom boom many actually creative/innovative/perhaps not business worthy companies actually had things like real break areas, creative cubicles, music, gaming time, gyms, etc...

      Now all those things are "anti-productive" and evil again...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by jgritz · · Score: 1

      Treating Employees like superheros - even better!

    3. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Hey, common you can treat people like crap, they'll do a good job in return and not just the absolute minimum! Honest!

      Did you perhaps intend to say "come on"? :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by BMazurek · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps he meant "commoner,"....

    5. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What a concept! Wow!

      Of course, if the average people employed (or employable) by the average business could ever, ever come close to being as smart, inspired, productive, and profitable as the army of PhDs and 140+ IQ types at Pixar, then we'd have more reason to wonder why the average employer doesn't look more like Pixar. But every company cannot have Pixar's capital (intellectual or financial) - there just aren't that many people of that caliber adrift looking for (and able) to do that sort of work. Hell, there isn't really even a market for more than a couple more Pixars, per se.

      So, the uncomfortable truth: most of us (myself very definately included) are way, way too mediocre to demand the costs (which are way higher than the paycheck) that Pixar has to cover to keep a body around, productive, and happy. It's like looking at the New York Yankees and wondering why your farm-league team's locker room isn't just as nice, and why it's take-the-bus instead of take-the-Gulfstream.

      Native talent. Raw brain horsepower. Big up-front financial investment. Hugely lucrative actual results. That's what enables that tech Valhalla you see at Pixar. Sure, you could have all of those things, treat people like crap, and then chase off all of that talent in about 6 months... but they're smarter than that. But what about all of the folks who try to get jobs at Pixar and just don't cut it? They, like me, toil in less idyllic environments, for less cash, with less cool office lighting, and with fewer Mr. Fusion-powered robo-scooters bringing them cardemom-enhanced lattes for "free." Oh well! It would all fall down if they didn't use their one-in-million people to make exceptional products. The other 999,999 of us per million get to have regular jobs, sometimes managed by average people without a large budget (because the average workers don't generally produce the above-average revenue that make fantasy office environments an asset rather than a liability).

      If we only had a foosball table for every average office worker that deserved better... oh, wait.. we did! And we financed them with crashed dot-com stocks! There's a reason that didn't work out except for a handful of Pixars and their equivalents in other areas (Google, et al).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      whoops. Thanks. I make that mistake often....

      "I mean come on guys, come ... on." ... nevermind...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    7. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by KtHM · · Score: 2, Funny

      What he *meant* to say was:

      Common people you can treat like crap, they'll do a decent job in return and not complain about their shitty working conditions! Honest!

      But geeks get whiny about it, wanting "fair pay", "overtime", "lunch breaks" and crap like that. It's insanity, I tell ya.

    8. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Black-Man · · Score: 1

      I've worked at places with "army's of Phd's" and they most certainly did not resemble Pixar's headquarters in the least!

      At any "normal" office, only the executives get perks. Period.

    9. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Skater · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My employer recently had a "human capital" survey to get our opinions on work conditions. I wanted to tell them that calling us "employees" or even "human beings" would be a good step in the right direction. Even the term "resources" is slightly better than "capital". Unfortunately, I wasn't in the survey.

    10. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you really thought about your answer and how shitty you feel about yourself...I have a tear rolling down my cheek just thinking about your mere sub-human 100-115 average IQ.

    11. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by JWW · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're giving Pixar too much credit. Sure they hire smart, talented, people. But one difference is that they're not all exactly IT people, they're artists, IT folks, directors, voice actors, etc. Just some of the jobs are IT and Technology related, everyone else works with technology.

      The really appear to have setup a great culture to create great movies. The work environment is part of that. However, there are many people who would like to see movies more often from Pixar and maybe see TV cartoons from Pixar with their characters. But they don't do that, they have a commitment to quality that goes beyond most other movie studios and in fact most other companies. And they know that to get that quality they have to trust their people and have to work collaboratively. It just amazes me watching their making of and listening to their commentaries on their DVD's how much of a team effort it is to bring their movies to life.

      Its all about culture. The difference here is that pixar looks like it does because it hasen't succumbed to that "gotta make a profit this quarter" culture that currently pervades American business. Thats what makes other jobs suck, everybody says they hire the best people, Pixar just appears to treat them better.

    12. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Thud457 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They may be allowed to dress them up pretty, but they're still veal pens. Those poor bastards probably work 60 - 80 - 90 hours a week 50 weeks a year. They might as well be chained to their desk. Stupid Americans.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    13. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Are you always so negative? A PhD costs somewhere on the order of 4 to 7 years study. Not impossible, anyone with enough self motivation and desire can accomplish this. (And finances - this is the only big stopper for main stream educational institutions. The local library is often a perfect and free alternative however.)

      Most of us are human beings, each with the same built in potential. Some take the leap and grab what makes them happy, others wither and die spending half their life putting food on the table, disliking it all the while.

      'Native Talent' - while some have their hardware wired a little oddly - they might be shit hot at math, but have no clue about tying shoe laces. It's all relative.

    14. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You make a greater point than your parent in this thread. The reality is Pixar has an environment like that because you need an environment like that to do the things they do.

      I work for a defense contractor. I couldn't imagine what our office would be like if it were like Pixars. In our office everyone wants their own office, they want a hardwood desk, book shelf, maybe an extra table. Everyone is allowed to bring in their own decorations but what you see are diplomas, family pictures, awards, certifications, some books, and a whole lot of business materials.

      It's quite possibly the most dull and sedated atmosphere I've ever been in, but it's what works. We're not looking for creativity as much as "by the numbers". They work at work and they play at home.

      An acquaintance of mine has a small startup of ~20 people (mostly part-timers) and it's dependent on creativity. So despite their small budget their office is set up to foster an amazingly different environment than ours.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    15. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by AT-SkyWalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you considered that maybe you look at yourself as "mediocre" because you have not been given the chance to tap into your potential?
      The people at Pixar, or any other great company are not "better" than you, they are people that push their limits everyday and don't settle for a self fulfilling prophecy of being mediocre which most of us settle with. If every person looked with awe at great achievers there would be no more great achievements! What Pixar does, as a company, is that it realizes that the best in people comes out only when the right environments are created and made available; hence this company continues to dazzle us with eye candy every release. Pixar is not doing this because they have the Smartest people!!! Look around you, there are companies out there that have so much more talent than Pixar, yet they don't reach their potential because they treat their talented employees like machines. They seek "efficiency" with their employees, but the fact is with people you can only get "effectiveness" because people are not machines and they are never going to be efficient. Pixar's env. Helps their employees to be "effective" Your companies polices, timesheets, and big brother mentality is trying to make an "efficient" machine outta you. That simply doesn't work on the long run and leads to the mediocre, and the "its just a job" culture.

    16. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Xorath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you hit on the biggest point here and that is that Pixar isn't trying to define success as profitability this quarter. American and in many cases global businesses are too concerned with the immediate future the current quarter. No heed is paid to the future and as a result we have less than idea work conditions where companies are often understaffed because adding that extra body will blow the budget, so the end result is 1 person doing the job of 2 but in reality giving as much real productivity as about half a person.

      Pixar has a good idea and they've taken it to the Nth degree. All I want is a good work environment where I'm able to start towards my potential instead of dreading walking into the office.

    17. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you always so negative?

      Actually, I don't think I was being negative at all - just realistic. Being negative is what I was responding to - the implication that if only the average employee was treated differently he/she'd actually be smarter, more creative, etc. I don't buy that, not in so many words. Truly crappy work environments certainly taint creativity, but truly great environments can only do so much to make a non-creative person a creative rock star (which is to say, not much at all if you're not already that kind of person).

      Most of us are human beings, each with the same built in potential.

      That, I definately don't buy. Even if we were to stipulate that at birth, everyone has the same capacity for the type of work that makes a Pixar shine, by the time that people are in their 20's and 30's, and filling in that job application at Pixar/Google/wherever, life has happened to them. They have (or have not) been intellectually nurtured, have (or have not) had the discipline to polish their critical and creative thinking skills, have (or have not) spent their time in a way that prepared them for a job as challenging as a gig at a top-flight shop. We do not all arrive at the human resources office "equal" in our potential. A prospective employer's choice of decor and office culture will not make up for the substantial differences in experience and intellect that truly do exist, no matter how politically incorrect that may sound.

      Point of interest: I'm going to say that my brother and I are probably equally bright and creative. But our characters, academic histories, and pursuits have been different enough that we've cut ourselves out for different activities. He actually does work at Pixar, and is definately thriving there. I'm more of an IT cowboy, and it brings me to different sorts of work. The specific character traits and skills that work for me in my setting are definately at odds with what's working for him (and thus, for Pixar, too). So, the point is: our potential to be valuable to Pixar is substantially different, just as our potential to be valuable to my customers (a more 1-on-1 consulting type audience) is different. We couldn't switch jobs now, and I don't think we could have switched paths years ago, either. Made of different stuff!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I'd say you're mostly right... and what it takes is a company that's willing to operate at a huge loss for some period of time. And that takes investors with very deep pockets who have some sense of longer-term vision. Those people are definately out there, else we wouldn't have Googles or Pixars. But that's exactly what a market economy is all about. People with good ideas (like, seeing past this quarter) can be bigger risk takers (like gambling that losing money for two years straight is OK), and can ultimately come out on top. But a lot of very smart people backed by smart investors with very deep pockets still sometimes blow it (see dot-com implosion), and so some (most) investors get gun shy. This swings back and forth, and always will, and periodically we hit the sweet spot and a Pixar or a Google is born.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    19. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      It's a common mistake.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    20. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that maybe you look at yourself as "mediocre" because you have not been given the chance to tap into your potential?

      Actually, I'm suggesting that mediocrity - pretty much by definition - is the normal state of affairs. There's a reason that Garrison Kealer's joke about an idyllic town in the upper midwest where "all the kids are above average" is actually funny: because it's a nice sounding, but logically impossible state of affairs. If no one was mediocre, there would be no middle-of-the-road, and then we'd all be Outstanding. At which point, of course, we'd just have moved the yardsticks that define where "average" is!

      Pixar is not doing this because they have the Smartest people!!! Look around you, there are companies out there that have so much more talent than Pixar, yet they don't reach their potential because they treat their talented employees like machines.

      Well, that I doubt. Maybe teams of people as talented as Pixar's, and perhaps not as well leveraged by the investors and management for whom they work - but taken as a cross-section of the population, a place like Pixar (as defined by the skills of the people they recruit) is definately unusual.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    21. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      How? That's NOT a typo. Do you get then and than confused too?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    22. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      it's like a habit that I got into back in the day and didn't break...

      like replying to trolls on slashdot.

      think about it.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    23. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      In most companies, they just use the pay package to reward the best. I work in post production where all of us get this kind of Pixar office environment (to a greater or lesser extent), but we don't get the big pay that the big talents at Pixar get. Cool offices are more of a film/TV/advertising industry standard than anything else.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    24. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I'm ALWAYS thinking about IT, that's why I don't get all my work done on time.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    25. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

      For the love of God man it's DEFINITELY.

      Three fucking times!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    26. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by booch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's one of my biggest pet peeves in the workplace -- being referred to as a "resource". Just like other resources, such as raw materials and electricity. I find it about as disrespectful as can be. And then they have the audacity to say that "our people are our most important asset".

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    27. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, see, that's why I can't get a job a Pixar. Eye done't half what it's take to bee a gud righter.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    28. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Imaginary friend. Good one.

    29. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Xorath · · Score: 1

      I totally agree there is this swinging back and forth between investors being very tight and only concerning themselves with next quarter and looser riskier times. But I would like to think that there is a happy medium, Pixar is at the far end of things in how they treat their employees. You don't need to provide so many perks that it's off the map cost wise but providing more than most businesses currently do would definitely go a long way to improving productivity and moral (I can't even take my team for lunch on the company when a big project ends... it comes out of my pocket). Its unfortunate companies don't see this.

      Now all I need to do is find myself one of those investors with deep pockets.

    30. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there's not much incentive to treat employees like human beings. Most jobs are relatively unskilled, or have more demand for jobs than jobs available, therefore you can treat people like shit and they can't do anything about it because they're so replaceable. Treating them like human beings just means extra expense, and makes them think they're more valuable than they are so they don't get much work done. I for one work in a manual labour job and accept the fact that I'm worthless to the company and therefore will be treated as no more than a slave that needs paying.

    31. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Tassach · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Most of us are human beings, each with the same built in potential
      Nice pep talk, but it's bullshit. Different people have different levels of potential. It takes more than dedication and hard work to excel in a given field -- it takes natural ability, which is not distributed equally.

      I'm a decent engineer; if I was sufficiently motivated I could possibly be a great one. But I could never, no matter how hard I tried, become a professional baseball player, because I just don't have the natural ability in that area. Conversely, I seriously doubt that the average major-league baseball player has the aptitude to become an engineer.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    32. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      A PhD costs somewhere on the order of 4 to 7 years study. Not impossible, anyone with enough self motivation and desire can accomplish this.

      Also don't forget: with a lot of money, and a lack of family to provide for.

      Most of us are human beings, each with the same built in potential

      No we're not. Not all humans have the same genetics to enable to them to be clever or skillful. Not all humans have the same education. Some get a good education, most get an awful education, some get no education whatsoever.

      Some get great facilities for learning, private schools, computers, well-stocked libraries, places to study. Some get state-funded schools, no computer, half-stocked library, nowhere to study but small bedroom in council house which you share with two siblings who fight and scream all day. Some get no computer, no library, a mud hut for a school, no chance to study because you work in a sweat shop to pay your parents debts.

      Some have rich parents who invest in your upbringing, some have poor parents who care more about where the next packet of cigarettes is coming from, some have parents who sell them into slavery.

      Some have family which include state governers and presidents, some have family which include farm harvesters and prostitutes.

      No-one has the same potential as anyone else, everyone starts from a different point. Human beings are not created equal.

    33. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that maybe you look at yourself as "mediocre" because you have not been given the chance to tap into your potential?
      The people at Pixar, or any other great company are not "better" than you, they are people that push their limits everyday and don't settle for a self fulfilling prophecy of being mediocre which most of us settle with.


      That's not necessarily true. Some people ARE better than other people. They are more clever, more skillful, have more natural ability, better education, more hard-working, more disciplined, more psychologically healthy, just better people all round. Some people have great potential, some have none no matter how hard they work.

      I for one have no potential. It doesn't matter how hard I work at something, I don't learn it. I can't understand things in months of trying that other people pick up instantly. I have no discipline, my hard-work ethic has gradually shrivelled up and died, and am psychologically fucked up. I am worse than other people, and it's nothing to do with 'pushing limits', some people are just better than others.

      It's merely some communist fantasy that people are all equal and it's just a matter of 'applying yourself' and having a good working environment.

      That simply doesn't work on the long run and leads to the mediocre, and the "its just a job" culture.

      A lot of jobs are just that. Most jobs don't need any creativity, they don't need independent thinking, they just need efficiency, nothing else. Not every company's goal is to make computer-generated cartoons with dull plots and irritating characters.

    34. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least they consider people an asset. some places run the worker into the ground, then wonder why they're leaving.... (last day, april fools!)

    35. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, it's basically what you tell the stupid kids so they don't go home and whine to their parents about how they're being left behind. If you're not successful by 30, you're NOTHING! in fact, you might as well hang yourself right now. seriously

    36. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the Dilbert cartoon:

      Pointy Haired Boss (PHB): I've been saying for years that "employees are our most important asset" It turns out that I was wrong. Money is our most valuable asset. Employees are ninth.
      Wally: I'm afraid to ask what came in eighth
      PHB: Carbon paper

    37. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To put it bluntly, yes, the people who work at Pixar are better than you.

      No, they're not. Bzzzt. Try again.

      Joe Blow Pixar may be a kick-ass computer animation guy, but drop him into any number of other tech jobs and he'd flounder like a fish out of water... "What do you mean, 'there's no GUI'? What's an FPGA? What's this kernel panic thingy you want me to debug?"

    38. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      No, they're not. Bzzzt. Try again

      You're deliberately missing the point. The people at Pixar are better than you at being the sort of people that Pixar will hire. So what if they're not all command line geniuses? That's not what Pixar needs in every slot! They need what (and who) they need, and can pay for it, and those are rare, well-compensated people. Period.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    39. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mention 140+ IQs. My friend from a former job now at Pixar used to bring his glock pistol to work and thinks that alien abductions are a common occurance. Create and talented as hell, but no shot at 140+ on the IQ scale.

    40. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ksaville00 · · Score: 1

      I would love to have a job like that...

    41. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You mention 140+ IQs. My friend from a former job now at Pixar used to bring his glock pistol to work and thinks that alien abductions are a common occurance. Create and talented as hell, but no shot at 140+ on the IQ scale.

      Obviously I'm being general. Since I have a family member who works for Pixar, I have a little insight into the place. They definately don't hire people out of pity - they find something very valuable or they don't bother (since there are thousands of people in line to choose from).

      That being said, maybe your friend got some proper meds and stopped watching old X-Files re-runs, and picked up a copy of The Demon Haunted World for a little perspective. Or, maybe Pixar is working up a tongue-in-cheek UFO movie, and he's actually a character muse. You never know!

      Oh: and being delusional definitely has nothing whatsoever to do with IQ. Other than that it's a fine film regardless, see "A Beautiful Mind" for some pretty-well-based-on-reality story telling along those lines. Or, just follow along with any number of brilliant social misfits and slightly off-center people who can be incredibly innovative, if a little (or a lot) odd. Now, on the other hand, I'm not sure how much I trust someone who really can't get past the alien abduction thing. On the other hand, the Glock is a fine weapon, but that depends on the alien you're shooting at.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    42. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by suyashs · · Score: 1

      Most "state" schools have the resources available, just that nobody uses them because the norms on campus dictate that its not right to make full use of them.

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
    43. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they say humans are a renewable resource.

    44. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're giving Pixar too much credit.

      Probably not enough, actually.

      But one difference is that they're not all exactly IT people, they're artists, IT folks, directors, voice actors, etc. Just some of the jobs are IT and Technology related, everyone else works with technology.

      Yup, but none of that changes my points about their overall profile or the fact that they've got the cream of the crop working for them (across all disciplines). That's not to say that Weta, or Industrial Light & Magic, or any of a number of other studios and related companies don't also have way, way talented people... it's just that Pixar (as an example, and as the topic of this whole thread) is able to (and must) afford people way outside the normal curve of people that most of us work with (or are).

      And they know that to get that quality they have to trust their people and have to work collaboratively.

      Surely you don't mean that the difference between their output, and that of some other company that's also techie-creative, is that Pixar "trusts" people to work collaboratively? I'd say that's backwards: Pixar has the pick of the litter for staff, and doesn't have to "trust" people of that quality to be engaged and energetically doing their piece of the work. When you're in a setting where the budget or other circumstances mean that you're working with less stellar people, you can usually "trust" that at least some of them will be weighing down the team, and require nagging from a project manager to get anything done, and simply not contributing to the project in proportion to their share of the payroll budget.

      says they hire the best people

      Meaning, they hire the best people they can afford. Pixar can afford better people than most of their competition, and they spend the money because of the results (and people) they get. Pixar just appears to treat them better

      Because if they don't those people will just leave. The more talented you are, the more you can expect that sort of treatment. For the vast majority of us, though, the stakes are lower, the risks are lower, the pay is lower, the performance is more average, and the co-workers are not 100% rock-star.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    45. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Soylent employees anyone?

    46. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

      ugh - you are quite right about some people are more talented than others - but in the , call it what you want - grand scheme of things, that truly matters little. Tesla was the fucking genius of the last century, and died, withered away in poverty.... so have many other super fuckin talented, creative, mathematically inclined people. Do you know why? Because it truly doesn't matter that they were in a certain way, when it comes to big corporations...

      Talented, TRULY outstanding individuals who do not easily burn out and can produce excellent results 10 out of 10 times they apply themselves to their job - are actually a thorn in everyone's ass in large corporations, where there's a lot of mouths to feed... Maybe if you were in a small corporation, working closely with the owner, you will get remunerated for your talents/effort accordingly, but generally speaking those who are super smart, are super arrogant and deluded that what they are represents something larger than capitalism, larger than life, and forget who they are and who they work for, or they burn themselves out by working for someone and expect an equal remuneration proportionate to their efforts. They measure their efforts as compared to the guy next to them using the same or a different title - and when they realize that at the end of the day the difference in pay may be even higher for the guy that worked less - they either quit, or get revolted and act out (and then they get axed later on anyway because they are of a rebellious nature)....

      So fucking what if someone is smarter than me or if I am smarter/more productive than someone else? It may mean something to me. It may mean something to the company. It may mean a lot of things, except one thing - that you are going to be rewarded, because I assume this is your entire underlying assumption in what you said, that smarter people should be more rewarded.... accordingly to your talents/effort.

      The "everyone is a winner" is actually the correct ideology to assume when you have a corporation where not everyone is equally talented or as productive. This is why corporations GROW and become MEDIOCRE eventually. It is not by _choice_, it is a consequence to the growth of the business.

      As a matter of fact, I think you will never be able to stay working at one company for a long time if you think that you can keep reinventing yourself or tryign to prove yourself or earn more than what is budgeted for you in the company... you will flat out burn out after a while.

      On the other hand, if you can obtain a daddy in the company, someone higher up, and you can do something for someone in order to indebt them in a way that they will feel and notice and talk about it, and especially in a way that can rake in more cash for them, or save them cash tremendously - now you're talkign serious advancement in the company....

      You are seriously confused if you think companies hire talented people because they want to reward them according to their talents.

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
    47. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by JWW · · Score: 1

      Surely you don't mean that the difference between their output, and that of some other company that's also techie-creative, is that Pixar "trusts" people to work collaboratively?

      No that's exactly what I mean. On the commentary for Incredibles, Brad Bird talks about how he threw really difficult tasks at his animators and let them sink or swim and most of the time they achieved something that was past their original capabilities when they started. He also related that when he started out in animation, the first director he worked for did not give hard tasks to the new guys and limited what they were allowed to do.

      The impression that I get from Pixar is that they're collaborative at every set of the movie making process and take input from whereever it comes (i.e. animators can give suggestion to story guys). An example showing where collaboration is better than top down control would be Empire Strikes Back, arguably the best Star Wars movie. George Lucas has less direct control over that picture than any of the other movies, and that made it BETTER.

      Pixar understands that more heads are better than one and they LIVE it. Many of their counterparts in industry do not.

      Talent plays a part in what Pixar is. But culture allows them to be what they are.

    48. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by AT-SkyWalker · · Score: 1
      Do you have any idea how many reels Pixar goes through for every hire they make? To put it bluntly, yes, the people who work at Pixar are better than you.

      hmmmm, "Better" is a very elastic word :-)
      I believe that IQ comes in lots of flavors and while I acknowledge that some people are more comfortable in certain areas than others, that doesn't mean that they are "Better" all across !

      This "everyone's a winner" shit is for the birds.

      I completely disagree with you. When it comes to economical entities you're right, but human beings , NO. In the "human achievment" world one should approach competition with an "abundance mentality" because although not every "Win" is the same one can find his niche "Win" and be satisfied that he tried his best and accomplished to his potential.

    49. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Talent plays a part in what Pixar is. But culture allows them to be what they are.

      I supposed, to refine my point: while culture makes a big difference (in the way you say), that's ONLY true if the employees within that culture are able to rise to the occasion. Many, many companies simply don't have that sort of staff - at least, not across all aspects of their company, the way Pixar does. And while a change of culture might raise up the odd suppressed talent here and there, most people simply have it or don't to work at Pixar-type levels. In other words, in a lot of settings, allowing the coders to chime in on what the marketing people are recommending for artwork on a print ad would be, well, ugly.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    50. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one have no potential. It doesn't matter how hard I work at something, I don't learn it. I can't understand things in months of trying that other people pick up instantly. I have no discipline, my hard-work ethic has gradually shrivelled up and died, and am psychologically fucked up. I am worse than other people, and it's nothing to do with 'pushing limits', some people are just better than others.

      I believe that the healthiest attitude would be to admit other people might more talented or in other ways "better" than you, while still trying to make the best of what you are. Giving into despair isn't helpful, as you more or less admited to in your post. To put it another way, just because you aren't in the 100th percentile doesn't mean you are a pile of shit, nor does excuse treating yourself like one.

    51. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by JWW · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. I think there are many more truly very capable people working at companies whose culture suppresses/inhibits them then there are great corporate cultures that don't have the right people to rise to the occasion.

      My counterexample would be that I garuntee you that you could find the "wrong" sort of person to lead Pixar, who would (with the same employees) destroy the corprate culture to the point that their employees would want to leave, no matter how good they are. Now getting the right person to create the right culture, that s the tough part. Thats where Jobs (and to some point Lasseter) shine, thats the difference.

    52. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we can agree that to make a truly exceptional performer like Pixar, you need something of a perfect storm: Great people (in the trenches and at the top) Patient, very deep-pocketed investors A certain amount of good luck (market/economy timing-wise) As you reduce or remove these elements, you quickly end up with an average or sub-par company, which is pretty much the normal state of affairs.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    53. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      To put it another way, just because you aren't in the 100th percentile doesn't mean you are a pile of shit,

      Yeah, but if you're not even in the 5th percentile, you have to realise that you're the scum of society, and will never amount to anything.

    54. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

      well.. thanks for the snippy remarks.. Tesla was greate, no matter how you slice it, whether you like it or not. Corporations only care about you in the most minimal sense possible, thus the feeling should be reciprocal.

      However, it seems you are pretty entrenched in your own beliefs, so further discussion is probably moot and my point is lost on you...

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
    55. Re:Treating employees like human beings? by danila · · Score: 1

      You prove the parent's point. You can be a great engineer. And practically everybody else can be great at something (assuming they have no lesions in their brain). Everybody deserves an interesting job with a comfortable work environment and if everyone was provided that (together with good education, smart managers, etc.) everyone could be as productive as Pixar's employees.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  5. Re:And ooh! by tuxnduke · · Score: 0

    Aaargh! At least you saw the article.. two posts on /. and during that time it's already slashdotted.. where has the world gone.

  6. Not to mention... by Reignking · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to mention the beautiful effigy of a hanging Mickey Mouse statue in the courtyard...

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    1. Re:Not to mention... by korbin_dallas · · Score: 1

      Hay did you guys see in last weeks issue (Mon or Tues cant remember) of USAToday, some pundit had 10 ways the new CEO at Disney could 'Turn the company around'.

      #1 Make up with Pixar.

      I laughed so hard I almost peed myself. I could picture SteveJ peeing himself with luaghter over that phone call too.

      Not 1 of the ten things covered:
      1. Hire smart employees
      2. Renew the animation department

      Not that I care, I just thought it incredible that all the SMART financial cna CEO types do not see the problems for the forest.

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    2. Re:Not to mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not 1 of the ten things covered:
      1. Hire smart employees
      2. Renew the animation department


      If they made-up with Pixar it would be a start for #2 on your list. I would be argueable that it might also show the value of #1 on your list as well.

  7. Pimp my cubicle? by chrishillman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am working the grill today at McDonalds, I hung up some napkins and drink covers to personalize my space. My boss is real mad, he lacks the creative spark that Steve Jobs has...

    1. Re:Pimp my cubicle? by Walterk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Napkins and drink covers? Call that pimping your cubicle? Dude, you need 20" chrome drink covers, and 42" plasma widescreen connected to a surround sound speaker system and entertainment centre powered by a Playstation 2 in your napkins, at least!

    2. Re:Pimp my cubicle? by Alien+Being · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I am working the grill today at McDonalds"

      Not exactly a rare job.

      "I hung up some napkins and drink covers to personalize my space."

      Trying to ketchup to the pixar guys, eh?

      "My boss is real mad"

      Flipping mad?

      "he lacks the creative spark that Steve Jobs has..."

      Mustard been his training at Hamburger U. It seems you're in a pickle, but there's no need to get cheesed off. Grow some mcnuggets, take off the funny hat, and tell him you deserve a break today.

    3. Re:Pimp my cubicle? by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Funny

      No kidding. I now have a bottom tier desk job at a University coming from 1.5 years of working retail.

      What...I have a...a...chair? And little fake walls upon which to hang items of personal interest???

      *tears*

      And...health insurance? ... *FREE* health insurance?

      *opening weeping for joy*

    4. Re:Pimp my cubicle? by oil · · Score: 1

      Dude, are you kidding me? You know that stuff would be covered in grease in no time, probably voiding the warranty on the plasma display. Not to mention making the chrome look like complete shit. It would be way more trouble than it's worth.

    5. Re:Pimp my cubicle? by zaddikim · · Score: 1

      -1 (groan)

      --
      Keen idea man lynches
    6. Re:Pimp my cubicle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You all actually cook your burgers on the grill now? Last time I came for a visit, they just slapped my burger in a vat of grease for a while and called it good. It sounds like McD's needs to put you in a higher position.

  8. Macs by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's nice to see the Macs, but Yo Steve! When are you gonna replace the rendering farm with Xserves? We want our films rendered even faster!

    Seriously though, given that one can easily approach #3 on the supercomputing list with a bunch of out of the box Xserves, one would expect this to happen at some point after the initial render farm has paid for itself.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (distortion field police arrive)

      i'm sorry but if you spend the same cash on a xeon based system, the xserve will not keep up.

      and if it's an opteron, forget it.

      "slowly put your hands in the air, and step out of the distortion field"

    2. Re:Macs by ZorinLynx · · Score: 0

      This is Steve Jobs, though. He can probably get Xserves for Pixar at cost from Apple.

      Must be nice to be the CEO two companies, one of which can make extensive use of the other's products!

      -Z

    3. Re:Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is Steve Jobs, though. He can probably get Xserves for Pixar at cost from Apple.

      That would not only be unethical, but most likely illegal as well, as it basically shafts Apple shareholders. Steve almost certainly hands off business dealings with Apple to someone independent.

      Of course Apple's sales staff probably don't have to waste time on Pixar...

    4. Re:Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a big fan of both apple and pixar and have a good deal of experience of working with render farms but I don't see how a farm of Xserves will be any faster than a farm of AMD64's.

      The disadvantage you have locking into Xserves is you now are stuck with 2 cpus per 1U where you could get bladed servers and have a much denser, more efficient rack.

      When a company is building a farm of thousands of procs, little things like space, power and heat make a big difference. The only 3 reasons that make sense for going with Xserves are 1) company discount 2) single architecture for tool base 3) cross branding/advertising for apple.

  9. Colour me Jealous... by Arbin · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..but sitting here in my cubicle of an office measuring no more than 80 Square feet, with plane white walls and no window, I'm jealous. No wonder they come up with off the wall creative stuff and I sometimes struggle whilst attempting to get the creative juices flowing.

    1. Re:Colour me Jealous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80 square feet???? You LUCKY LUCKY bastard!I'd kill to have a cubicle as spacious as yours!Mine must measure 64 square feet at best!

    2. Re:Colour me Jealous... by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      Sheesh. I have a real office (complete with walls, door and window) but they still put a cubicle in it just to put the screws on me. A cubicle just as wide and long as the room.

      Apparently it was cheaper to move the space cubicle in than to move the spare desk in.

      And don't we all feel loved?

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  10. Another Steve Jobs story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    As if we don't get enough Apple stories to keep Apple fanbois happy, here's another Steve Jobs story. /. should change its tagline to "News for Steve Jobs fanbois. Stuff no one else give a rats shit about"

    BTW, do they use linux workstations there or SGI? Macs aren't great for animation.

    Go ahead, mod me down....apple fags

  11. Re:And ooh! by FlyByPC · · Score: 0

    ...and DOWN it goes!

    There ought to be a way that BitTorrent could be expanded to regular websites. It's quite possible, except for the legal problems. Perhaps if there were a robots tag specifically allowing this?

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  12. Google Cache Version by anonicon · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Google Cache Version by tliet · · Score: 1

      What's up with the Google 'cache' anyway? Half the time when the original site is down, the cache won't work either. Some cache...

    2. Re:Google Cache Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, by the next time the article is duped, it'll be cached. Might as well bookmark it right away..

    3. Re:Google Cache Version by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google only cache text, not images.

      So when using the Google cache link, your browser will often start waiting for images to load before displaying the text. And since these images are Slashdotted, it can take a while. :-p

      However, you can make it work much faster by clicking the "view cached text only" link in the Google cache header. Here's that page showing text only. It should load much faster, as it doesn't even try to load the images.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Google Cache Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And here's a link with images (coralized):
      http://aintitcool.com.nyud.net:8090/ display.cgi?id =19658#1

    5. Re:Google Cache Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And here's a link with images (coralized).

  13. Coral link works by ++CaChElInKeR++ · · Score: 5, Informative
  14. Re:And ooh! by andy753421 · · Score: 1

    try the google cache speaking of google maybe they could get some 'best work-place' competitions going between the two

  15. One bathroom in the whole building by xylix · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As the article mentioned, when the building was being constructed Steve Jobs wanted to have one bathroom (I assume one for each sex) in the entire building. I used to teach business in a college and used to have an article about Pixar that I got my students to read that mentioned this fact. I would then try to get them to decide why Jobs wanted this. (The linked article doesn't give an explanation.) Apparently, his thinking was that it would facilitate communication and creativity. If everyone had to walk THROUGH everyone else's space and all gather in the same place there would be more interaction and cross-pollination of ideas. (I included this reading in a unit on "synergy" in business!)

    From what I understand Jobs didn't get his single washroom for the whole building. But I *think* I heard that there is one washroom PER FLOOR instead for the same reason.

    1. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Gudlyf · · Score: 5, Funny
      "...all gather in the same place there would be more interaction and cross-pollination of ideas..."

      I dunno about you, but your use of "cross-pollination" when refering to reasons behind a single bathroom gives me the heebie-jeebies.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    2. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Reignking · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, I'd hate to have the cubicles around that bathroom! And you thought the seats near bathrooms on the plane could be bad...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    3. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by LocoMan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think the building wasn't built by them.. or at least not entirely (maybe it was redesigned or expanded later, though). Not too long ago there was a 3D related event here in Venezuela and two of the people invited were from Pixar, one of them was talking about how is life there, and one of the things he mentioned was the "love lounge".

      Basically he said that when Pixar was starting and they moved in, there was a "missing space" in the building next to John Lassetter's office. As it Turns out, that missing space was a 2 by 2 meters (or so) room where they had the huge (and very old) air conditioning unit that wasn't being used anymore, so they removed it and had a small door (about a meter tall) cut in the wall, and then they pimped out the place with a nice sound system, a disco ball and lots of other stuff, and most celebrities that visit Pixar are invited to have a drink and sign the wall there. They also show it on the second DVD of Finding Nemo.

    4. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Actually, it says exactly that, in the section on the atrium.

      It is one beautiful set of offices, and must have cost a mint. Since the company's coining money, there is of course absolutely nothing wrong with that. I hear Pixar salaries aren't that great, but with this as what they get in compensation, I suspect there are few complaints.

      D

    5. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by vjmurphy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps that's where they got ideas for the Incredibles?

      In the Pixar Restroom:

      Employee 1: Yeah, the wife calls it "Mr Incredible"

      Employe2: Really? My wife has nicknamed mine "Dash" for some reason.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    6. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by swb · · Score: 1

      Isn't one washroom per floor kind of typical of most large buildings? I work in a 40 story downtown tower and our building only has one per floor per gender.

      I'd imagine that buildings with a larger footprint might have two per floor, but I can't say I've been in too many buildings that have more than that.

    7. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by endofoctober · · Score: 1

      Isn't the minimum number of bathrooms for a new building determined by building code? Having a single bathroom might allow for 'cross pollination' and all, but that's not really the point of bathrooms.

      Having a single /breakroom/ would seem a better choice, and one that wouldn't potentially leave employees crossing their legs and hopping around 'synergizing' with their fellow desperados.

      --
      - Jack
    8. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by fhmiv · · Score: 1

      At NeXT's buildings in Redwood City, there were only one set of bathrooms in each building.

    9. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by slackerboy · · Score: 1

      Isn't the minimum number of bathrooms for a new building determined by building code?

      Actually, I think the building codes specify the number of toilets/urinals (as well as number of handicapped accessible and maybe even by gender). It just takes up less space (and plumbing effort) to site all of those in the same location.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    10. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Employee 3: Sniff! My wife calls mine "Shrinking Violet".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But they didn't mention Jobs plans for a 2-bathroom model.

      With a scroll wheel.

    12. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      What is stupid is that I've worked in several government buildings that only had one washroom per floor or sometimes even less. I don't think they did this for creative or communication reasons, but let me tell you, it didn't help with communication or anything like that.

      There are larger problems to tackle in an organisation than how many bathrooms there are. Good leadership makes the most difference. Working conditions come way later.

      I once worked in a freezing cold building with paper thin walls while using a card table as a desk. We were much more successful than some of the multi-billion dollar projects I have worked on that had what I call "invisible managers" running the show. I won't go into detail on why I call them that (it does not mean they are not involved in the project), but proper management makes all the difference in the world.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    13. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...hmmm...go have a look at the end credits of a Pixar film - they list 'production babies' - children born to staff during the making of the film - there usually quite a few!!!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    14. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Danathar · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you...but I don't want somebody who is "Touching cotton" to be passing (Hey! It's a pun!) by my cube.....

    15. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      "I hear Pixar salaries aren't that great, but with this as what they get in compensation, I suspect there are few complaints."

      Except swanky offices and cushy cubes and bathrooms doesn't pay mortgages and rent or put food on the table or buy clothes for your kids. All it does it make you spend more time at work and away from family.

    16. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Mandrel · · Score: 1

      "Micro-soft Willie", another epithet from which great things have grown.

    17. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The idea of having one bathroom in the whole office was originally popularised by the animators at Disney who believed this would mean everyone would meet little and often and thus have even better ideas.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
    18. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      Employee 1: "That's usually caused by a Syndrome"

    19. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no cubicles around that bathroom. There's common space, to re-enforce the entire concept that the single bathroom would facilitate more informal meetings.

    20. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by sysadmn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, with a cubicle near the bathroom, you'd at least get the amusement value of watching the folks from the top floor running for the john. And think of the fun you'd have with an "Out of Order" sign on beer-bash Fridays.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    21. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work at Pixar and no, we did build the building. The love
      lounge just happened to be one of those spaces built for
      the HVAC but ended up unused.

    22. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1


      Only one bathroom? Ain't that a piss-ar!

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    23. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by drsquare · · Score: 1

      And think of the fun you'd have with an "Out of Order" sign on beer-bash Fridays.

      Yes, people would piss all over your desk.

    24. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

      Employee 3: (to Employee 1) Man... You'll be calling your wife "Elastigirl" soon if you use that thing on her.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    25. Re:One bathroom in the whole building by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Would you rather raise kids or change the world?

      Some people will say change the world. Others will say raise kids.

      More power to both.

      D

  16. Thanks by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I needed my nose rubbed in the fact that I have a shitass job.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Thanks by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Thanks - I need my nose rubbed in the fact that I don't have a job at all!

  17. Some more pics of Pixar by LocoMan · · Score: 4, Informative
    Can't get on the site (slashdotted already)... but if you want some more pics of what's it like to work there (note that I don't, except in my dreams, that is), some pics (taken by Victor Navone, he made the alien song short some of you migth have seen).. :)

    link

    There's also some great stuff about that in the second DVD of Finding Nemo.. :)

    1. Re:Some more pics of Pixar by stupidfoo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Pick from server room

      Someone isn't labeling all of their racks. Naughty naughty.

    2. Re:Some more pics of Pixar by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      If you do the scroll bar and blink your eyes just right, you can see the animation!

    3. Re:Some more pics of Pixar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and there's nathan barley on his scooty-puff junior

      http://www.navone.org/PhotoGalleries/Pixar/sourc e/ img_0315.htm

  18. Re:And ooh! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    IIRC, someone's working on a BitTorrent-based HTTP proxy.

  19. Ain't It Cool News hasn't been cool in years ..... by Luscious868 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I remember a time, 4 or 5 years ago, when they used to get all of the scoops. It was really the only site you had to go to get the latest news and spoilers about all kinds of cool movies. Today they are a joke. They are the last to report on most stories, if they report on them at all, and I can't remeber the last time they had a really interesting exclusive about any of the movies I really care about. You haven't been able to register for the talkback for almost a year. McWeeny's latest X-Men 3 "scoop" was something to the effect of "I know who will direct X-Men 3 but I can't tell you". It's nothing like it used to be, which is a shame, because I used to love that site.

  20. Steve Jobs by Magnusite · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...no choice but to enjoy every damn minute that you work there.

    Well, with Steve Jobs, you better, becuase you'll be working there every damn minute of your waking life.

    Apple T-shirts: working 90 hours a week and loving it!

    1. Re:Steve Jobs by isecore · · Score: 1

      Apple T-shirts: working 90 hours a week and loving it!

      Aaah, good times!

      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
    2. Re:Steve Jobs by bobobobo · · Score: 1
      Apple T-shirts: working 90 hours a week and loving it!

      And I'm not even getting paid!

  21. cottages? by cheezemonkhai · · Score: 3, Funny

    "your cubicle... Which they don't have at Pixar, no they have cottages"

    Are those like cubicals with a roof? Doesnt that mean that when they run out of space they can just turn them into houses and high rises, by stacking them :p

    1. Re:cottages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


      they are also known as a shed, a place you keep would usually gardening equipment not people

    2. Re:cottages? by aug24 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Should we tell Pixar that, here in Britain, 'cottagers' are men who go looking for rough sex with other men in public lavatories (cottages)?

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    3. Re:cottages? by Reignking · · Score: 1

      That might explain why they are currently developing the biography of George Michael...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    4. Re:cottages? by mikael · · Score: 1
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:cottages? by cheezemonkhai · · Score: 1

      Was going to mention that i nthe original thread but didn't think many people would pick up on that :)

    6. Re:cottages? by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      They have "thatched roof cottages?"

      Oh noes, I hope trogdor doesn't burninate teh pixar!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:cottages? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like Brits will really succeed trying to put a homosexual slant on our dialect of English... ha....

      You guys "smoke fags" for fuck's sake!!

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    8. Re:cottages? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we burn faggots. (Or eat 'em with gravy...) J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    9. Re:cottages? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahem. Well. That brings a whole new meaning to the phrase 'cottage cheese'. Yikes.

      Look, the language is working perfectly fine, now, you folks can stop making up silly words, okay? :)

    10. Re:cottages? by I_am_the_man · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest fucking posts I have ever read!

    11. Re:cottages? by joschm0 · · Score: 1

      Is that what Shepherd pie is?

      --
      01/20/09
    12. Re:cottages? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Are those like cubicals with a roof? Doesnt that mean that when they run out of space they can just turn them into houses and high rises, by stacking them :p

      Kind of sucks when the guy in the cube below you has a peaked roof, though.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  22. I keep my lawnmower in my shed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. Re:Ain't It Cool News hasn't been cool in years .. by JPelorat · · Score: 1

    It fills the quarter jars pretty quickly though.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  24. Pixar DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful



    Big deal.

    Check out the 'behind the scenes at pixar' special feature on any Pixar DVD. The same stuff + 50.

  25. They've come a LONG way by sgant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember years ago going to SIGGRAPH and Pixar had this little booth off in the back. Ed Catmull was there manning the cash-box to where you could buy a videotape of their few animated shorts they had made up to that point.

    Ed freaking Catmull was taking my bucks and sticking a videotape into a bag for me. I know, geek worship here, but this is Ed Catmull we're talking about.

    Now look at Pixar!

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:They've come a LONG way by Psiren · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know, geek worship here, but this is Ed Catmull we're talking about.

      Wow, I'm not as geeky as I thought I was, cos I have no fucking idea who the hell you're talking about. Should I be concerned at this point?

    2. Re:They've come a LONG way by SiO2 · · Score: 0

      You can find his bio here.

      Always remember, google is your friend.

      SiO2

    3. Re:They've come a LONG way by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      So I look up this name of a person that I had never heard of, and I find out that he is a rich or famous person that I did not know about and now I can become an official geek and say, "You mean you don't know who that is?" Wow!

    4. Re:They've come a LONG way by sgant · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, let's see...I looked up Ed Catmull on Google and the very very very first link that pops up is from Pixar that describes Ed as:

      Dr. Ed Catmull is president and co-founder of Pixar Animation Studios. In 1979, Ed brought his high-technology expertise to the film industry as vice president of the computer division of Lucasfilm, Ltd. During that time, Ed managed four development efforts in the areas of computer graphics, video editing, video games and digital audio. Ed has been honored with three Scientific and Technical Engineering Awards from The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for his work, including an Oscar®. He also won the Coons Award, which is the highest achievement in computer graphics, for his lifetime contributions. Ed is a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and National Academy of Engineering. He earned a bachelor of science degree in both physics and computer science and a Ph.D. in computer science from University of Utah.

      Which may stimulate a person that's really interested in looking up more about him instead of the person that just wants to try, and fail, at being a smart-ass.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    5. Re:They've come a LONG way by oil · · Score: 1

      Don't sweat it. Your just not a graphics geek, that's all.

    6. Re:They've come a LONG way by Weirdsmobile · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Speaking of attempted smart-assery... "Well, look him up. In case you didn't know, there's this site called www.google.com that you can search for names and web sites etc etc. You should check it out, it's pretty cool web site and I have a feeling it may be big one day..." Next time just post the damn info instead of assuming that everyone should automatically share your interests.

      --
      For relaxing times...make it Suntory time.
    7. Re:They've come a LONG way by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      This is NEWS FOR NERDS isn't it? Even if you don't know who Catmull is, you should fucking well know how to find out.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:They've come a LONG way by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how it works. This new knowledge gives you the right to be proud.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    9. Re:They've come a LONG way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Every geek should know Catmull-Rom splines.

      For example: http://www.mvps.org/directx/articles/catmull/

      A bit like if we were talking about Jim Gray, Gaston Julia or Boris Delaunay.

    10. Re:They've come a LONG way by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If someone's talking about a completely unknown person as if they were some massive slashdot celebrity, then the burden's pretty much on them to explain who the hell it is.

      Maybe it's just me, but I don't want to have to research the people mentioned in every single slashdot post just to find out what the hell is going on. It's like those articles that consist of nothing but acronyms that no-one's ever heard of, and if you complain someone tells you to go and research it yourself...

    11. Re:They've come a LONG way by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      Amazing how asking experts directly is no longer considered a valid form of research. So what happens when everyone tells eveyone else to look it up and no one actually bothers to actually answer the question anymore?

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    12. Re:They've come a LONG way by sgant · · Score: 1

      Which is why, if you look at my original post, that I said it was a "geek" thing. If you're not a computer graphics geek, you would never have heard of him. The same can be said about anyone that someone finds famous really.

      And another thing, why would you resent that some people find him to be an idol of theirs? Indifferent I can see...but resentment? Why resentment? And he's hardly someone no-one has heard of. Just because you haven't doesn't mean no one has. It only shows your limited knowledge of the subject matter at hand.

      Remember, News for Nerds.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    13. Re:They've come a LONG way by sgant · · Score: 1

      I said "try, and fail, at being a smart-ass".

      I tried, and succeeded, at being a smart-ass. There is a difference. ...Mister Smarty Pants

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    14. Re:They've come a LONG way by sgant · · Score: 1

      He's not a completely unknown person there sparky...just because you don't know about him or his work doesn't mean no one else does. The burden is on YOU if you don't know who he is. If you don't know, and don't care, why even make a post at all? Move on, it's ok. You don't know him, many other people do. It's no big deal. But I'm not going to fucking write a biography every time I bring up just in case there is someone that doesn't know him. If you know him you would have gotten my geek worship, but you didn't and you don't get it...so what? Move on.

      Why is this pissing you off so much? You've made 4 posts now on how you don't know Ed Catmull and how much you resent people talking about him or even bringing him up because you don't know who he is. My original post was just a cute little anecdote about how small Pixar was back then and how big it is now...then you turn it into this. "Who is that? I resent you bringing up something I don't know anything about! How fucking dare you!".

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    15. Re:They've come a LONG way by sgant · · Score: 1

      Something that needs explaining I can see, but a person? I've seen many many people mentioned on here that I just go up to my googlebar and look up...it takes like 2 seconds.

      Also, my response to him was a smart-ass response because he asked a smart-assed question. Wow, I'm not as geeky as I thought I was, cos I have no fucking idea who the hell you're talking about. Should I be concerned at this point?

      So I ask you, was that a "valid form of research"? If so, then I apologize.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    16. Re:They've come a LONG way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so instead of taking two seconds to google for the name and appear to be more intelligent then you actually are, you spend two seconds to post on slashdot about how hard it is to type a name into a search box and hit "i feel lucky".

    17. Re:They've come a LONG way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Terminus. Population you.

      How's that for geeky? : )

    18. Re:They've come a LONG way by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      You're right, he should have said, "Fucking Google it!"

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
  26. Sigh, and so history repeats. by Icarus1919 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I talked with a couple of guys who were also waiting there in the lobby, guys working with Pixar on an ancillary project. They sounded just as excited talking about the company as I'm sure I did, and it struck me: for hardcore animation fans, Pixar plays the same role that the Beatles must have for music fans in the '60s. We are living in a golden age, watching true giants in their primes, and each new film they put out is a joy because of the incredibly high genre defining standards that they hold themselves to."

    Nothing's worse than hearing a line like this and knowing that it's only a relatively few years down the line before the wrong type of management takes over, and the public ends up with just another Disney that churns out the same type of rehashed stories to make a quick buck, and marry it with hurried animation carried on the backs of the overworked "Cottage" dwellers. Pixar is certainly a fine example of a company with more on their mind than the bottom line, and one that understands that happy workers are productive and creative workers, but it won't last. I'm sure we can all think of many companbies offhand that fell from such a height (I believe HP was featured recently on Slashdot.)

    As a bit of an aside, Google may one day fall too. We can all hope that this won't come to pass, as Google symbolizes and displays pretty much every virtue that a techie could want in a company and it would be nice to see the proverbial good guys hold their own, for once. Perhaps their hiring practices will help protect against it. Once again, though, all it will take is a bad, short-sighted management and stock-holders that think only of the coming quarter and not several years down the line. Thinking down the line is how Pixar and Google came to rightfully stand on the pedastals that they now do (and hopefully will for years to come.)

    1. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by kevinx · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a bit of an aside, Google may one day fall too.

      Yes my son, but there is much power in the dark side.

    2. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      Nothing's worse than hearing a line like this and knowing that it's only a relatively few years down the line before the wrong type of management takes over, and the public ends up with just another Disney that churns out the same type of rehashed stories to make a quick buck

      Uh, except that Disney, from the beginning, has almost never done anything original. I fail to see any resemblance to any past story with anything Pixar has done outside of the vague reference to the Aesop fable of the ant and the grasshopper in A Bug's Life.

      Computer animated movies go through a MUCH different process than live action or traditional animation. You should listen to the director commentaries. Computer animated films (by any house, not just Pixar) are always a fluid story that doesn't completely solidify until late in the process.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    3. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by Urusai · · Score: 0

      News flash, Google has fallen. They had an IPO not too long ago, and that is "selling out" in my book. They sell search rankings, FFS. Why is everyone still on Google's crotch?

    4. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We can all hope that this won't come to pass, as Google symbolizes and displays pretty much every virtue that a techie could want in a company and it would be nice to see the proverbial good guys hold their own, for once.

      Every virtue except a good working environment? Sure, Google has the best cafeteria around and a masseuse but have you seen the spaces people sit in? While Pixar has cotteges for their animators, many software developers at Google don't even have their own cubicles. Huge teams sitting in open bull pens with barely enough space to raise their elbows. I walked into a pen and every single person on the team had to look up and see who it was. They probably lost a day on their schedule for that.


      Funny how all of the people I know who work at Google are planning to bail the day their original options package vests. Actually, it's not funny at all.

    5. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by ken+kenobi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Umm... suggest you go watch Kurosawa's Seven Samurai. Sure Bug's Life is a nice movie, but original? No. Some scenes (the opening springs to mind) are a shot for shot lift (sorry, homage).

    6. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by qbzzt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing's worse than hearing a line like this and knowing that it's only a relatively few years down the line before the wrong type of management takes over,

      What's the big deal? People are important, companies are just a way to organize them. If bad management takes over Pixar, the creative people will just move elsewhere.

      As long as it's possible to move somewhere else where you can be creative, and as long as you really are productive (so somebody will finance you), who cares if this or that company fails?

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    7. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Google symbolizes and displays pretty much every
      > virtue that a techie could want in a company

      Except that Google is packed to the gills with arrogant pricks. Extreme selectivity also breeds elitism and delusions of superiority. And no, this isn't coming from someone who couldn't get a job there, rather someone who had a few meetings there and learned from the experience not to want one. There are certainly a lot of very smart people there, and there are definitely some very nice ones. I know that too. But there is a very significant population of people who think they're God's gift.

      Add to this the fact that Google throws money around like it's 1997, they may well prove to be another iteration of the cautionary tale that was Netscape. That or the next Microsoft, for better *and* worse.

      I won't be surprised if this mods flame, but it's a relief just to say it, with all the Google bootlicking that goes on around here.

    8. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by Bean9000 · · Score: 1
      What's the big deal? People are important, companies are just a way to organize them. If bad management takes over Pixar, the creative people will just move elsewhere.

      But a certain organization of people, just the right mix of certain skills, personalities and experiences is what is able to create something truly unique.

      Pardon the cliche, but a good company really is more than the sum of its parts (and i suppose the inverse would hold true for a really bad company.) I really don't believe there is a shortage of brilliant people in the world, it's just that getting the right mix of them to produce something unique and creative is surprisingly bloody hard.

      This is esspecially true in a creative field; you can't just expect to sick a bunch of highly skilled people together and expect another Pixar to happen.

    9. Re:Sigh, and so history repeats. by danila · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, this will happen as more competitors enter the market, the competition intensifies, the costs increase, profits drop and so on. It's very easy to spend millions on everything and declare that only the best (employees, computers, furniture, etc.) will do, but you need to have a temporary monopoly for that.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  27. Employee satisfaction first by Pingsmoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is a concept that many companies don't understand. They stress, over and over, the idea of customer satisfaction, customer service, and friendly employees. I worked in retail for nine years and we were told day after day to smile, be friendly, be helpful, and care for the customer. But I found, day after day, that my employer was not willing to extend the same courtesies to me and the other employees.

    I believe that if a company's employees enjoy their job, they will gladly serve the customers, help the customers, and extend that sense of friendliness without being prodded and told to do so.

    --
    http://www.walkingtaco.com
    1. Re:Employee satisfaction first by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly! My Dad had a retail store in Richmond, VA while I was growing up. I always thought that the way he treated his employees was the way *all* employees were treated. (I.e. very well.)

      Then I worked in retail for 1.5 years. Every day it was harder and harder to be cheerful and helpful. The more we gave, they more the company wanted. If we met or exceeded our sales goal for the month, the goal was increased by half the next month. Accomplishments were shortly praised, mistakes lingered for weeks.

      Retail in general doesn't *want* thinking employees. It wants automatons who won't try to question or think of new ways to do things because they simply don't know what to do with us.

      Now I have a (by many standards) crappy desk job and I love it. It does help that one of the perks is working on an awesome university campus though :-)

    2. Re:Employee satisfaction first by shashark · · Score: 1

      They stress, over and over, the idea of customer satisfaction, customer service, and friendly employees

      Because johny, the *customer* pays for *your* salary, apparently.
      In an area like retail, employees are a commodity. For the employer, human resource is a "cost-centre", so its bloody well obvious that he/she would like to keep it down.
      After all, you *did* stay for 9 years.

    3. Re:Employee satisfaction first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it helps if the employee enjoys the job. The boss knows that the employee is the means for generating profits. The question in my mind comes down to whether the boss respects you as a human being or blames you for being a human being. [sic]

    4. Re:Employee satisfaction first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A friend of mine usedd to be a manager at a Roots store. He would always goof off with his employees, created a 'positive working enviroment' and made it fun for his staff to work there.

      One day, one of the higher-ups in the company came by his store, and was not impressed by his 'anctics' and pretty much gave him the boot and put someone else in.

      The store after that became a rather grouchy place, the employees were always crabby/etc, their new manager was a hard-ass.

      The sales/customer satisfaction of the store conseqently went down, and they tried to get my friend back, but he had already moved onto a better paying job.

    5. Re:Employee satisfaction first by gkitty · · Score: 1
      Nobody, but nobody, sat down and thought, "Gee, how can we make our employees happier?"

      You obviously haven't worked for Steve. He does think about these things. He obsesses about the rightness of things down to the details.

      He has learned the expediency of good business, but it is hardly his top priority. He can certainly be difficult or insensitive if he feels you suck or your goals aren't aligned with his.

      But if you knew Steve, you wouldn't question that he wants things to be as right as they can be, almost for their own sake, knowing that goodness will emerge from this environment. I haven't worked for any of his companies for a long time, but he was responsible for the best work environment I ever enjoyed.

  28. I just lost respect for Pixar by gosand · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, what a cool looking place to work, I mean you can make your own space, nice furniture, spacious - OMFG - is that a Garfield doll ?! What kind of mindless idiots do they have working there?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:I just lost respect for Pixar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garfield.. what a shame... I was struck just as hard as you.

    2. Re:I just lost respect for Pixar by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      OMFG - is that a Garfield doll ?! What kind of mindless idiots do they have working there?

      I am reminded of a Margaret Cho anecdote where she is talking about weighing the pros and cons of getting out of the bed to pee, or just peeing in the bed. "It'll be warm...for a minute."

      That's the kind of humour Garfield is like. It's like pissing on yourself; it might be warm for a minute but then it gets cold and you've got piss on you.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    3. Re:I just lost respect for Pixar by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Except Garfield isn't even warm in the first place. I've read it when it's been in the paper, but it's NEVER been funny. At least Dilbert tries to have jokes, even if many of them fall flat, but Garfield doesn't have anything. There are NO jokes, it's just some cat sitting there. Thank god it's been cancelled.

      Here's the obligatory maddox link: http://maddox.xmission.com/c.cgi?u=garfield_sucks.

  29. Cottages -- Cottaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cottages? Do they go cottaging in them?

  30. lack of faith in Ain't It Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given AICN's reporting techniques in the past, I wouldn't trust anything that "Moriarity" says.

  31. 60 MInutes did two stories on Pixar HQ by peter303 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you catch them in summer repeats, you'll see a fun place to work.

    1. Re:60 Minutes did two stories on Pixar HQ by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      I'm glad they're still finding time for that hard-hitting journalism.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:60 MInutes did two stories on Pixar HQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why everyone seems to have a skewed view that it's all fun and games. When I interviewed there a few years ago, everyone I interviewed with looked obviously drained, tired, and lethargic. They mentioned that people usually worked long hours - at least 60+. They all looked away when I asked them if they were enjoying the place, as if they didn't want me to know the truth. They all said it was a great place to work, but they weren't believable.

      They were interviewing and hiring, but the day I interviewed they just received a shipment of 80 of the 250 Sun E5000's for their renderfarm. They were being unloaded into the hallways near their renderfarms during the time I was interviewing. The very next day they called up a friend and cancelled her interview, which followed 2 days after mine, and told her that they had a hiring freeze. They also called me and apologized for wasting my time. I asked if the reason was because they just received a shipment of Sun's and they said yes. I did mention that my friends interview was cancelled and they rescheduled her for an interview. It may be that the hiring freeze was fabicated, but, considering the fact that they cancelled interviews, it was likely the case.

      I guess I was lucky. The timing was wrong. I would have been tempted if I got an offer. I wasn't completely ready to go back to 2 years of continuous 60-90 hours after I had just moved to a 40 hour/week job. After a few years at a nice 40hr/week job, only a huge sum of money would tempt me back to working long hours again.

  32. Cottages! That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of Brits will be smirking at the use of the term "cottages". It has a rather unfortunate slang meaning here.

    1. Re:Cottages! That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you know what them arty types are like ;)

      Thinks for lowering the tone btw, next you'll be explaining dogging to our friends across the pond.

  33. OMG DOORS!! by yohan1701 · · Score: 5, Funny
    There are doors on those cottages. I would kill every single one of my fellow employees for a door.

    To be able to shut out Chatty Kathy who's cell phone rings ten times and plays la-cookaracha and gets louder and louder when she doesn't answer it or Dum and Dummer who need to have a discussion at my desk when Dummer has his own office.

    1. Re:OMG DOORS!! by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

      But if you didn't have fellow employees, then you wouldn't need a door! :~D

    2. Re:OMG DOORS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude I feel your pain.

    3. Re:OMG DOORS!! by GuyWithLag · · Score: 3, Funny

      You might want to consider investing in a cell signal jammer. Works wonders.

    4. Re:OMG DOORS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quick answer is to throw Chatty Kathy's cell phone out of the window when left ringing on her desk whilst she's not around.

      I've done it before... and whilst they weren't particularly happy with me it never happened again. :D

    5. Re:OMG DOORS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above option is considered anti-social if you haven't had the courtesy to mention the problem to them before throwing their phone out the window.

      It's also a no-no for a first offence!

    6. Re:OMG DOORS!! by GuyWithLag · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've put a cell phone _in_ a cow-orkers computer, after warning her to keep it at all times on herself.

      Lots of fun... she could hear the ringning coming from somewhere on her desk, but could not fond it...

    7. Re:OMG DOORS!! by gregRowe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have what I call a half-assed cube. It's not even a cube. They removed the rear wall and half of the wall to my right. They call it a "labicle." The truth is that they don't trust us and thus force our montiors to be open to everyone. What a fantastic work envrironment!

      --
      There\'s no place like ~
    8. Re:OMG DOORS!! by yohan1701 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like what we have. The "cube" walls are only half height they come to just above your waist. They are really only there to hold up the desk.

    9. Re:OMG DOORS!! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      I think that a big mallet is cheaper and would get the point across better. :)

    10. Re:OMG DOORS!! by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      dumb and dumber, not dum and dummer

      Also, la cucaracha not la-cookaracha.

    11. Re:OMG DOORS!! by Col+Bat+Guano · · Score: 1
      I have a door on my office, by I could still here the annoyingly loud (and stupid!) email alert from the next office. Asking it to be changed or turned down didn't work so I decided to retaliate.

      I put a quicktime movie of the intro to "Super Chicken" on repeat, turned up the volume, and left for a couple of days leave.

      Super Chicken was still running when I returned, but the email alert was nowhere to be heard :-)

    12. Re:OMG DOORS!! by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      Sure, but then you have to get up, get the mallet, find the luser, and apply the LART. Lots of work. With a signal jammer, you just press the button. Plus, it silences all cell phone connections at the same time! One would need a pretty big mallet for that .....

  34. Cottages? by Millennium · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do they have thatched roofs? Do you get burninated instead of fired?

  35. Speak for yourself by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Today my cube has inspired me thusly:
    % ls
    % pwd
    % ls
    % pwd
    % ls
    % pwd

    .oO("What was I doing?")
    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  36. A place for feet... by blackhedd · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember reading the Jobs bio a while back that mentioned how in the early Apple days (on Bandley Drive) Steve used to walk around barefoot? And how he used to give himself foot massages in the toilet?

  37. Check our the extras on the DVD by xRelisH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    because you see more of how great the company is. I'd love to work there as a developer on Pixar Renderman after I graduate.

    1. Re:Check our the extras on the DVD by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've actually seen those on the Finding Nemo DVD and you can tell just from the video that shot at Pixar HQ that the people that work there are sure having a lot of fun. :)

      I can just see Robert Iger--who will succeed Michael Eisner this Fall--try to go way out of his way to keep Pixar working with Disney, because Iger know what a big moneymaker Pixar is to the Walt Disney Company.

  38. Aintitcool that its slashdotted already? by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hahahahaha

    --
    Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
  39. Cottages? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    As any true Brit can tell you, those are SHEDS.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  40. Americans have wierd ideas of personal space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'm not to interested in talking to other guys when I'm standing around with my dick in my hand.

  41. A gilded prison, a happy worker does not make... by Assmasher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No offense, and I'm sure that much of the coolness of Pixar emanates from the creativity of the people who work there and the laxity of the 'corporate culture'; however, unless you work there you shouldn't presume that it is 'fun' because of the workplace. It certainly APPEARS to be a fun place to work ;).

    I've worked in startups in old gymnasiums in the Mission District in San Fran and I've worked in plush corporate offices with EVERY amenity (massages, shoe shiners, crazy weird stuff...) and job satisfaction was related to the working space for no one at these two companies.

    That being said, it certainly looks nice :). Makes it easier to empathize with children as an adult if you're not surround by grey cubicle walls, LOL.

    --
    Loading...
  42. behind the scenes of "The Incredibles" by ctrudeau · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just watched the extras on "The Incredibles" DVD yesterday and it contains a whole bunch of interviews inside the offices. All the "cottages" are clear along with some interesting insight into the personalities there. Nice stuff around, but it looked to me like some were difficult people to work with. The hazards of genius, I guess.

    1. Re:behind the scenes of "The Incredibles" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they would ever interview the grunts who toiled under these personalities. When I interviewed there, I asked them how they liked the place. They all said they did, but none of them looked like they did.

  43. Ditto AOL by jpellino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When AppleLink Personal Edition morphed into America Online, some of us making the switch were beta-testers - we got a special disk with the client SW on it, and were to use it for a few months at half price as their way of thanking us, after which we'd get the real disk with the full release / full price client. Another few months went by, then I got a call from the main office, Steve Case called to let me know that the 'full' client was NG and had been still charging us the beta rate, and could I please send them a check for the amount I'd already spent with them in the last oh, 6 months?
    Um, no - but I will send you six checks, a month at a time. He thought that might work. I asked how many of us this had affected - a dozen? Yes. Hundreds? Yes. Thousands? Look , that's not the point. So I methodically settled up, and once the full client began to suck wind, I ended up elsewhere...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Ditto AOL by zonker · · Score: 0

      the original client was pc geos. it was pretty sophisticated for the time (i remember a lot of bbs's used it because it was pretty good at multitasking multiple lines and multiple door programs). had a decent gui right from the start. i remember getting win3.0 (i don't think 3.1 was out yet) and wondering when they were going to finally release the windows client...

  44. Re:Coral link works, not really by gliph · · Score: 1

    Hmm... you know its bad when even the coral link is slow. What?! Are you all so miserable at your current jobs?! Yeah, me too... click... click... click

  45. That Building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was considerably less exciting when Sybase inhabited it (I should know, I was one of the residents), and even less exciting when it was a United States Postal Service sorting center. Now all the 'dudes' that work there just skateboard over to the chill out room and jam on the electric guitar to blow off steam. Back in the day they blew off steam with FULLY AUTOMATIC MACHINE GUNS in a little ritual we know as 'going postal'. Oh , and speaking of 'cottaging' one of the bay area's more infamous cruising spots is literally around the corner from pixar hq, so the name may be appropriate given the locale.

  46. But how many hours do they work? by muntumbomoklik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well if you're already stuck in a 60 hour work week maybe it wouldn't make a difference, but what kind of hours do these people need to put in to get their stuff done? Are they given all of their amenities so they never need to leave? Vacation? Go outside?

    Whenever a potential employer starts racking up the extra 'amenities', I start to wonder what kind of thing they want in exchange.

    I'll just take the money, thank you very much.

    1. Re:But how many hours do they work? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      HA ha ha ha! That is funny, the idea that you would provide amenities to keep workers at work! If you pay workers a low enough hourly rate they will work every goddam hour they can.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  47. It needs to be a fun work area by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

    because when the crunch comes down, they put in some serious hours. Really serious hours. Even pixar has deadlines in the end.

    I'm sure having that sort of work area helps a lot though, as does the masseuse who comes around givng back rubs, etc etc..

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  48. pimp up your cubicle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we do without moronic MTV type rap BS phrases here on $lashdot?

  49. Sigh, and so history repeats-Going Public. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Nothing's worse than hearing a line like this and knowing that it's only a relatively few years down the line before the wrong type of management takes over, and the public ends up with just another Disney that churns out the same type of rehashed stories to make a quick buck, and marry it with hurried animation carried on the backs of the overworked "Cottage" dwellers."

    That's why you don't take a company public.

    Private: Satisfy yourself.

    Public:Satisfy someone else.

  50. Holy Cow, they have a bar WITHIN their office! by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    and here's the pic

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  51. Hayao Miyazaki at Pixar by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    Look at him signing autographs at Pixar (and the commment.. priceless)

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  52. Rendering farm switched last year by reptilicus · · Score: 0

    Apple switched their rendering farm to OSX machines early last year, at least according to this article. Slashdot discussion thread here.

    1. Re:Rendering farm switched last year by Swedentom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the article: "switching to Mac OS X and G5 workstations for its production work"

      --
      Sig Nature
  53. Unwise by FreeUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Opterons have a better bang/buck ratio than any Apple product, and I say this as one who enjoys his powerbook immensly (of course, I also enjoy my Linux boxes, and my Linux partition on my powerbook).

    This is Steve Jobs, though. He can probably get Xserves for Pixar at cost from Apple.

    Then he'd be stealing from one set of stockholders to pad the pockets of another set. Unless Pixar becomes a division of apple in an official, complete merger, doing something like this would be a very bad idea. There's good reason companies keep separate books (and often separate stocks) even when they are conglomerated together.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Unwise by Tassach · · Score: 1
      This is Steve Jobs, though. He can probably get Xserves for Pixar at cost from Apple.

      Then he'd be stealing from one set of stockholders to pad the pockets of another set.

      Not necessarily. I can think of lots of scenerios where shuch a deal would be ethical and in the stockholder's best interest:
      1. Apple has excess inventory that isn't moving fast enough. Selling it at cost (or even at a loss) lets them put that money into something that IS moving.
      2. Advertising value. Apple gets to use Pixar as a showcase of what their hardware can do.
      3. Cross-promotion/licensing. In exchange for providing discounted hardware, Apple gets mentioned in the credits, product placements, etc; and gets cheap/free licences to make tie-in products.
      There's a lot of ways of getting compensation other than cash.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:Unwise by daveschroeder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The really funny thing is, they'll continue to deny it in the face of things like this and this.

      That's why I took a couple week hiatus from even posting here. That, and the fact that after hundreds of points of positive moderation, all it took was a couple of factually correct posts in a story about John Gilmore modded down to "-1, Troll" to get me literally banned[1] from posting to slashdot for a week.

      Real nice.

      [1] And yes, that really is the full story. These posts - 1, 2, 3 - got me banned from posting, even as three other posts in the same story got moderated to +5: 1, 2, 3. Sure, I could have worked my way around the "ban", but what's the fucking point? To post to a place where you're not wanted and opposing ideas are shouted down?

    3. Re:Unwise by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you talking about?

      We're talking HUNDREDS of machines for a RENDERING farm, this is apples to oranges buddy, not desktop mac vs desktop amd machine.

      Once the build is setup for the opteron machine and rolled out to each new one, there IS no fucking maintenence (unless they have things setup far differently from what one would expect for such a large operation)

    4. Re:Unwise by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      We're talking HUNDREDS of machines for a RENDERING farm, this is apples to oranges buddy, not desktop mac vs desktop amd machine.

      Once the build is setup for the opteron machine and rolled out to each new one, there IS no fucking maintenence (unless they have things setup far differently from what one would expect for such a large operation)


      Ok, even in this environment - essentially a large, uniform cluster - how, then, do you explain something like this?

      The IBM PowerPC 970 family (and the forthcoming dual-core PowerPC 970MP) isn't a bunch of dogs - they stand up EXTREMELY well against, e.g., Opteron. The real issue is still Mac OS X Server and Xserve's relative immaturity when compared against, say, Intel/AMD solutions running Linux and a lack of solutions designed for Mac OS X Server and the PowerPC architecture as opposed to, say, Linux on x86-64. But there's no reason, given what we've seen with clusters so far, that an Apple solution can't be a real - or even better - contender.

    5. Re:Unwise by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      So ultimately after all you've said there's no real distinctive advantage to using the apple solution over the most likely faster and cheaper opteron solution,... except to continue promote apple?

    6. Re:Unwise by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      No, what I just said - and what you could see if you even took a moment to look - is that the PowerPC 970 solution is actually cheaper and faster than the Opteron solution, and likely the main reason it still isn't used more widely is because of a lack of familiarity on administrators' part with Apple's offerings and benefit in this area, and the fact that many of the solutions may be built for Linux on x86/x86-64. But the 970 in a cluster setting actually has dramatically higher price/performance, which you'd see if you bothered or even cared to look. Instead, you said the exact opposite of what I stated.

  54. While I'm sure Pixar is a nice place to work... by Bamafan77 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...I can't help but think some of the stuff they do for their employees is part media sensation. So while I think Pixar would treat their employees very well regardless, I think they go the extra mile because they know the media and their camera crews will be there (in this specific case, moriarty and his digital camera) and they know they'll (along with the public) flip out when they see the atrium with the statues of Pixar characters.

    And while we're on the Steve Jobs praise, don't be so quick to commend him on developing the great environment at Pixar. The truth is (as you'll see in the link) that Jobs bought the Pixar in 1995, sold it to become a billionaire and left the original technical founders with almost squat (in fact, he ran off co-founder Alvy Ray Smith). Yeah, this is a guy only concerned about the employees.

    The fact is that Pixar had a family atmosphere before Jobs got there and Jobs in fact tried to destroy it. Jobs was the PHB that many so readily (and rightfully) deride, yet for some reason his reality distortion field is such that it allows him to escape much criticism and be hailed as a genius. He may be a genius, but probably not the kind you want to be around if you don't have to be.

    1. Re:While I'm sure Pixar is a nice place to work... by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you talking about? Jobs bought Pixar from Lucasfilm in 1986, not 1995. The article is talking about taking stock options that were not given to the other founders (I don't know anything about that).

    2. Re:While I'm sure Pixar is a nice place to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It IS a nice place to work...

      Steve Jobs is still CEO of Pixar, he did not sell it and leave. Whatever problems Steve may have (I don't know him so I can't comment) he hasn't destroyed Pixar. My salary and benefits are sufficient, and I like the work I do.

      The building looks the same as it does in Moriarty's photos every day, there is no special decoration crew that preps the place for the press.

    3. Re:While I'm sure Pixar is a nice place to work... by Bamafan77 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Steve Jobs is still CEO of Pixar, he did not sell it and leave."
      In fact he *did* sell Pixar. He sold it to himself and named the new company Pixar. The deal was approved because he was majority shareholder in both companies. The deal was done of course to screw over the employees.

      I'm sure Pixar is a great place to work and the salary is and benefits follow this. But it's all relative, right? Financially, the engineers and founders who made Pixar were exploited by Jobs. Many of engineeers who spent years building the company got nothing, while most others got a fraction of their true value.

      There is no doubt that Jobs deserved significant financial return since he invested $50 million over the course of 10 years, but some of his actions were exploitation pure and simple. But that's all old news and has been nicely swept under the rug.

    4. Re:While I'm sure Pixar is a nice place to work... by Bamafan77 · · Score: 0
      " What are you talking about? Jobs bought Pixar from Lucasfilm in 1986, not 1995. "
      Correct, and I mistyped. Lucas went *public* with Pixar in 1995 after investing around $50 million over 10 years. Going public is what made him the billionaire and turned him back into a genius after his NeXT failure.
    5. Re:While I'm sure Pixar is a nice place to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NeXT? A failure? NeXT is the second most popular desktop OS in the world.

  55. Re:A gilded prison, a happy worker does not make.. by isecore · · Score: 1

    (massages, shoe shiners, crazy weird stuff...)

    You've got me hooked, what was that "crazy weird stuff"?

    --
    I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
  56. GAH! by Kyani · · Score: 1

    I was wondering why I was having a hard time browsing AICN -- Damn you slashdot effect....damn yooooouuuuuuuu! *shakes fists at the sky*

  57. Time Off at Pixar & Production Babies by Slorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    The credits of each Pixar film include the names of the babies born to staff families during production.

    So, they must get _some_ time off - or now we know what they do with the cottages.

  58. Dreamworks vs Pixar by Danathar · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just emailed my buddy back at Dreamworks (identity protected!) and here is what he said about what it's like at Dreamworks... - The pixar tour site is slashdotted, so I don't know what they have. We have: large offices, with doors, with one or two people per office fountains, park-like areas, waterfalls, lagoon area, courtyards, etc. Southern California weather free breakfast free lunch (relatively gormet, with usually two or three entree options) free well-stocked snacks (fruit, chips, candy, ice cream, etc) free tea, coffee, soda, juice, etc. $20/month health insurance for my whole family free movies, about 2-6 per month, often well before public release lots of gaming options around campus (pool, ping pong, darts, foosball, shuffleboard (table version), street hockey, etc. free gifts from time to time (ranging from shirts and DVDs to digital cameras and stock)

    1. Re:Dreamworks vs Pixar by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Heres what it was like to work at my last job - just cubes, no offices for even managers (only the head of the entire office had an office with a door), no fountains, no park like areas just a blacktop parking lot, no waterfalls, no lagoons, PA crappy weather, no free breakfast, no free lunch, no snacks, $130 month health insurance for an individual (over $400/mo for family), no pool, no ping pong, no darts, no free gifts. No training or tuition reimbursement ("no need for that when we can attact employees without it" I was told). Somehow I think this is more typical.

  59. Re:What if you're a Leftist and you hate capitalis by niola · · Score: 1

    I think you are generalizing all liberals and inappropriately. Yes, there are some on the way way way far left that think capitalism is a bad thing, but most folks liberal or not know it is the best system out there.

    I consider myself to be a very liberal person. I believe that us as people OWN common resources such as the land, water, air, electro-magnetic spectrum, etc. Do I think captialism is bad? No. But it is not a perfect system.

    I think you would see a lot less anti-capitalism rhetoric from people if the desire for accountability extended all the way to the top of a company.

    When you have people like Ken Lay, Bernad Ebbers, Andrew Fastow, John Rigas, and Dennis Kozlowski still not in jail for their crimes it does lead one to question our system. Why is a white collar criminal that takes BILLIONS of dollars often punished less than the piece of garbage that stol a carton of cigarettes from the local convenience store?

    This becomes even more relevant with the President wanting to create private investment accounts. If my social security money is diverted into a public fund like that you can bet damn well I want anyone that is stealing money from me held accountable to the fullest.

  60. Um, no by bonch · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs is CEO, and no way shareholders would want him leaving.

    Jobs has said that "Pixar is the most technically creative company, while Apple is the most creatively technical company."

    1. Re:Um, no by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Steve also holds a majority stake (51% or so) in Pixar, so he'd have to vote himself out in order to lose the CEO spot.

      He has, apparently, learned his lesson from the Apple/John Sculley experience.

  61. Re:A gilded prison, a happy worker does not make.. by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    Let's see... Birthday parties where they hired entertainment (there was a BIZARRO clown one time), Dim Sum service once a month (it was really crappy Dim Sum, I mean, how could it be good if you had to cart it around town?), Yoga classes in one of the conference rooms, an aborted attempt at a company sponsored sailing club.

    It was as if we had a tour director on the Liedo (sp?) deck... LOL.

    --
    Loading...
  62. I wonder as mac user by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Which shareware programs used at Pixar? I would bet for Graphics Converter by Lemke for instance. http://www.lemkesoft.com/en/index.htm

    Also it would be funny if they used haxies on those evil big macs.

  63. Re:What if you're a Leftist and you hate capitalis by leoval · · Score: 1

    Your post really makes terrible use of every single buzzword, Leftists, Capitalism, Rulling class etc.

    It seems that you have very strong preconceived ideas about their meanings. But at the end they are all wrong.

    Left and Right are just labels of two opposite sides of power and cannot, should not, be used to brand any particular set of ideologies in an universal way. In my home country for instance. We have a Right wing liberal goverment (I am not kidding you). And during the early 90's we had a "neo" Liberal goverment that was all in favor of free markets, changed the constitution to allow
    religios freedom and dissolved congress.

    So you see, your post makes no sense to me at all, because in my own epistemologic system, Left and Right don't mean the same thing that in yours.

    Perhaps if you cared to provide more detailed definitions in your rants, your post would be taken more seriously.

  64. Re:What if you're a Leftist and you hate capitalis by deanj · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, all those jokers will have their day in jail; Ebbers was just convicted, and he'll have jail time to deal with shortly.

    And recall that it was under this President that these jokers were "found out". It was under the last one when they created the havoc they did.
    And I say good riddance. They should all go to jail.

    As for investment accounts, the accounts are not forced. You have a choice about whether you want to invest in them or not. If you don't trust it, then don't have one created. Simple as that.

    Personally, I'd like a system like Congress itself has, where they DO have private investment accounts. I'm sure that if more people knew about that, or better yet, we were able to take those AWAY from Congress, there would be a lot of screaming going on.

  65. Re:Love My Job??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love it!

    Someone with half a brain gave me a -1 rating. While this person punching their proverbial (or maybe not proverbial) time cards to flag another poster a Troll, and kissing the bosses backside one more time so they can live their dream of retiring with a big pension at 65 (or maybe it will be 70 by then?), I'll be building yet another business that will earn me passive income so I can enjoy a trip to Hawaii whenever I feel like it.

    Keep up the good work, Mods! You'll be rewared ... someday ... I'm sure of it.

  66. I *love* my workplace by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

    I love my workplace.

    Not sure which I love more:

    - The whips in the morning
    - The acid bath after the afternoon "Resource Meeting"
    - Or the vodka to help me sleep at night

    1. Re:I *love* my workplace by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      enjoying the sig, thanks.

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    2. Re:I *love* my workplace by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Likewise. Your sig is Simple and true.

      Thanks for the support.

  67. Resource - Dilbert by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny
    Reminds me of the Dilbert where the pointy haired boss is talking about the latest study from HQ:


    PHB: We've been saying that our people are our most important asset for years, but our recent inventory shows that's not true.
    Dilbert: Really? Where do we rank?
    PHB: 17th.
    Dilbert: 17th!?
    PHB: Yes. Just below carbon paper.

    Man, it almost makes you wish they'd just come out and say the truth:

    • "People are our 17th most important asset"
    • "Quality is job 36!"
    • "Turning a quarterly profit at our company's long term expense - that's what we're all about.'
    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  68. D'ho! My bad! by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    You know, I should probably read the other posts to see that someone else posted the same thing.

    Before anyone burns a "redundant" mod point against my karma, though, would they consider the "sincerest form of flattery" argument first? Please? Pretty please??

    Didn't think so...

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  69. Errrm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
    Here you go: http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/0b03f1cd74ffa8734 e4dd63a452912b2/index.html/

    Is your link hosed or your cache?

    I'm getting a page saying there no cache there.

    Can anyone post a working one?
    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Errrm ... by sp3tt · · Score: 2, Informative
  70. Unisex bathrooms by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    (I assume one for each sex)

    Two bits:

    1. As I recall the show Ally McBeal used this as a plot point in the pilot. The partners wanted a unisex bathroom in order to incerease communication/camaraderie/etc in the firm. While a lot of the stuff on the show (especially towards the end of its run) was weak, I thought they milked that concept pretty well.
    2. On an anniversarry show of 60 Minutes Harry reasoner commented to the effect that he pitched most of his stories to producer Don Hewitt by cornering him in the bathroom. They then had Ed Bradley and some of the other male correspondents say the same thing, indicating "everyone knows that's how you pitch a story to Don." Then they told Lesley Stahl this during her interview and she commented something like "Damn! No wonder I can't get anything on the air around here!"
    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  71. Re:What if you're a Leftist and you hate capitalis by superdude72 · · Score: 1

    Yes, there are some on the way way way far left that think capitalism is a bad thing, but most folks liberal or not know it is the best system out there.

    I wouldn't say I *know* that. I would paraphrase what Winston Churchill said about democracy: It's the worst system out there, except for the others we've tried.

    Pixar is an outlier. You can find examples of luxury in any economic system. The Soviets did a pretty good job with the Moscow subway, and I wouldn't have objected to living under their system, provided I had a high rank in the Party. I wouldn't have minded feudalism, either, provided I was a lord.

    Sweatshops are the norm for unregulated capitalism--not something to take a lot of pride in. Under our system of regulated capitalism, safe mediocrity is the norm. Not ideal, but quite a bit better than most of the alternatives.

  72. Dream Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pixar created the optimal work condition for such a creative company

    Not only that. because I work there my penis is now 10 inches long and I can lick my eyebrows too... and all without CGI assistance.

  73. Re:D'ho! My bad! by booch · · Score: 1

    Your "Quality is Job 36" was enough to excuse your mistake. Plus, when I read with highest scores first, it looks like the other guy was the redundant one, since you have a Karma bonus over him.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  74. Re:D'ho! My bad! by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    Er, ah, yeah... I wasn't the redundant one! The nerve of him!!

    Unfortuantely, there's the whole timestamp issue.

    In any case, I'm glad you like "Quality is Job 36." I'm thinking of having it tatooed on my forehead. Better yet, perhaps I should get a chloroform soaked rag and hide in the shadows in the executive parking lot. Now, that would be one amusing police report and mug shot for The Smoking Gun

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  75. Another Ed Catmull Story by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine was visiting San Francisco and while driving across the Golden Gate Bridge saw a big expensive Mercedes Benz with the license plate PIXAR. Knowing I was a huge fan of Steve Jobs she called me to tell me. I told her to describe him. She said he had a beard and was wearing a dress shirt. I realized it couldn't be Jobs because he wasn't sporting a beard at the time and wouldn't be wearing a dress shirt. I realized it was probably Ed Catmull.

    Then my friend starts going "Ewwwww Ewww Ewww!" I asked what happend. "He's picking his nose! I mean he is really digging!" Ed Catmull picks his nose!

    1. Re:Another Ed Catmull Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pick my nose too. Do you think that I will be famous some day?

  76. Reminds me of those old Nike commercials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's the shoes."

  77. Avoid by heroine · · Score: 1

    They've been on KPIX news many times so I'm well familiar with the facilities.

    First of all, in the movie business you're only as good as your last movie. It's real percarious in places like that, not good when owing $1000 on rent every month.

    Secondly, doesn't your gut tell you there's way too much open space in that place? If having so much unused space on the most expensive land in the entire world seems a bit inefficient, imagine how inefficient their other practices are.

    The reason u.s. can stay afloat despite having the world's largest trade deficit and the world's largest federal deficit is that every single u.s. dollar is spent in the most efficient way possible. Pixar just doesn't seem even remotely efficient enough to be viable.

    1. Re:Avoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use the big open space for the giant meetings. Steve jobs stands on the bridge overlooking the space to make his announcements.

      So, the space is not unused.

      As for the most expensive land in the world? wtf? What are you on? You obviously don't know the area at all. Emeryville was a city of rotting old factory shells before Pixar and other businesses finally moved into the area. The Home Depot, CompUSA, OfficeMax had only opened up there a few years earlier and they were not even heavily visited. You really didn't want to be there at night. The area was a blight. There are still plenty of Live-Work Lofts in old factory shells left over. Most of the thin strip of Emeryville is adjacent to the Southern Pacific and Amtrack tracks.

      Pixar got the land at a tremendous bargain 6-7 years ago. It was only recently that the Bay Area had hyperinflated Real Estate prices. The addition of Pixar, Sybel, other corporations, and several shopping strips has rejuvenated the area. They all bought there because it was all cheap at the time. The notorious crime-ridden area called West Oakland in the city of Oakland is also a few blocks away from Pixar. Oakland's red light district is nearby too. Back in the late 80's and early 90's, you could buy houses in those nearby blocks of Oakland for $10,000 - $20,000 (far cheaper than the $50,000 it would have taken to build a house at the time) because you really didn't want to be there. Now, they're selling for 10 times that amount.

      So, no, Pixar bought the land because it was cheap. It allowed them to spend the money on a nice big building.

      Why would any corporation pick the most expensive land to build their corporate headquaters from scratch? They picked it because it was a bargain and it was off the freeway and closer to more of their employees than their previous place north in Richmond. If they wanted expensive they would have picked San Francisco.

      The Pixar campus is also completely gated. That's not solely to keep spies out. It's partly that way to keep the neigboring crime out.

  78. Steve Jobs bashing by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    You know, for all the legitimate reasons to bash Steve Jobs, it's strange to see people going after him for the way he runs Pixar. Seems to me, from what I've read and heard, that he does a damn fine job of deflecting a lot of external shit from the creative talent there. I would never give him any credit for the films that have been produced, but you have to give him credit for running a place that manages to (apparently) maintain a healthy atmosphere for the talent even in the midst of them becoming one of the most powerful film companies on the planet.

    I'm curious however. Those of you who point the finger at Michael Eisner for the way Disney has become such a shambles in the last decade... you also give no credit to Jobs at Pixar? Either the CEO gets credit/blame or not. If you hold those two views (and I bet there are plenty here who do) then you should consider why you accept such an obvious double-standard.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  79. Re:Ain't It Cool News hasn't been cool in years .. by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    Is this the part where we talk about how fat Harry is?
    Seriously though, I agree, the site has gone downhill in terms of the quality of the scoops. Part of it may be getting too close to the creators, but I think a lot of it is that the site (and others like it) was too good at their job and the movie inustry has tightened up their process so there are a lot fewer leaks and information in general is just hard to come by.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  80. Re:What if you're a Leftist and you hate capitalis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ebbers not in jail? You Bush-supporters are all alike. You'll lie to make your point. We'll, you can't tell the truth so you just lie.

  81. Re:Ain't It Cool News hasn't been cool in years .. by AICNMoriarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, McWeeny's latest X-MEN 3 scoop was that Matthew Vaughn would be announced as the director. Which he was. Today. A week and a half later. We break plenty of exclusive content. I've been responsible for a fair percentage of it already this year. And our traffic (even on days we're not Slashdotted) is at an all-time high. I think the site is better now than it ever has been, and will continue to improve. If you really think we don't have any exclusive content, then you aren't paying attention.

  82. Eh? by TheInternet · · Score: 1

    Secondly, doesn't your gut tell you there's way too much open space in that place? If having so much unused space on the most expensive land in the entire world seems a bit inefficient, imagine how inefficient their other practices are.

    "Open" doesn't necessarily mean "unused." :)

    The fact that it's not a tightly-packed cube farm is the whole point.

    - Scott

    --
    Scott Stevenson
    Tree House Ideas
  83. Fix your talk back registration ... by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    It's been like 6 months ....