Slashdot Mirror


Sun's Bold New Ad Campaign

Celeritas writes "Sun is making some noise over their latest x64server entries by doing a fly by over Dell's HQ yesterday. A few pictures were snapped to capture the event. Sun has continued the offensive by running some interesting ads as well as designing some that were rejected due to the controversial content or as Sun calls them 'bold ad concepts'"

426 comments

  1. Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it's better than driving by in a stretched Cooper Mini, anyway.

  2. Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... for Dell Computer Corporation, anyway.

    McNealy is sure paying a lot of money to keep Michael's name in the big lights.

    1. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      How are these ads for Dell? Look at the
      specs. The Suns cost 50% less,
      and use 66% less power. If anyone did
      any investigation (which is often the case when
      buying servers), then Sun gets the benefit of
      this ad. If, however, buying servers is merely
      about name recognition and "branding" then,
      yes, Dell benefits. But honestly, home
      users do not buy 1U devices. People who
      buy 1U devices look at price, performance,
      and power consumption. So, these adds help
      Sun.

    2. Re:Looks like some great ads by dcocos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point that you are missing is that ( and this is a rule of marketing) is that the market leader never mentions the any competitors, but the rest of the companies ALWAYS mention the number one company so that potential consumers will equate their product with the market leader. Think about how often Pepsi mentions Coke in their ads but Coke NEVER mentions Pepsi. This is literally taken my from Marketing 101 class that I took oh so many years ago.

    3. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the price quotes? Opterons at $750. This is 50% less in cost than Dell. Your comment that "people are still not going to pay big money for what is otherwise commodity hardware" makes no sense. You are either retarded or didn't RTFA.

    4. Re:Looks like some great ads by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Actually one of Dell's exec's made a funny comment in a dev. meeting that someone in marketing just wasted the rest of [Dell's] quarterly ad budget on something that would only be seen by Dell employee's (and whoever happened to be on I-35).

      He apparently didn't see the Sun logo, which was very hard to see.

    5. Re:Looks like some great ads by FromageTheDog · · Score: 1
      The lower power consumption sure is compelling, but here's what struck Sun servers from the running when we were building our cluster:

      Cost!

      I'd wager that, as was the case then, the real ass-whuppin' would be if Dell ran a performance/$ benchmark vs. the Sun machines...

      - Fromage

    6. Re:Looks like some great ads by javiercero · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why using an OR with your previous post? The poster was obviously retarded AND did not read the article.

    7. Re:Looks like some great ads by Lost+Found · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny... as crappy as Microsoft's shit is, they could be called not only a leader but a monopoly. Yet, they seem to have a lot of hot air to let out about Linux...

    8. Re:Looks like some great ads by Mateito · · Score: 4, Funny

      The 1RU has dual power supplies. I like that. The Dell might as well, but personally I'd buy a Sun over a Dell. But then I'd rather wax my butt crack with an angry wasp than buy a Dell.

    9. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> If anyone did any investigation (which is often the case when buying servers)

      not where I work....

    10. Re:Looks like some great ads by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A minor point -- do competitors mention the #1 so that they are equated with them (i.e. seen as the same as them) or so that they are seen as a valid competitor, that is, in the same class as the #1?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    11. Re:Looks like some great ads by sharkey · · Score: 1

      He said market LEADER, not market STRANGLER.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:Looks like some great ads by willpall · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've always taken the opposite line of reasoning: That the runners-up avoid mentioning the name of the market-leader (saying, "the leading brand" or "...than other leading brands") so as not to imprint the consumer with their competitor's brand.

      An exception that proves my point is the Honda Accord. I personally equate that brand with positive feelings. Why? Because every other car commercial touts how much roomier/faster/more efficient/cheaper/safer/prettier their model is than the Accord. So I get the feeling that the Accord is a de facto benchmark, seeing as how every carmaker compares themselves to Honda (or often, the Toyota Camry)

      You took a Marketing class, I haven't. Maybe they cover what I'm talking about in Marketing 201? :-)

      Let me know.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    13. Re:Looks like some great ads by DoctorBit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A few months ago, I wanted to bid on a used Sun monitor on Ebay, but decided not to after giving up in frustration trying to learn the monitor's specifications from the Sun website, and then also from email correspondence with Sun tech support representatives. Basically, Sun doesn't provide any information about their old products except to people who are paying expensive support contracts.

      I wound up buying a Dell P1110 monitor instead and no one bid on the (probably superior, but I'm not sure) Sun monitor. I think that Sun's lack of support for their old products gives Sun's products poor resale value, so I'm avoiding buying any new products from Sun.

    14. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that you won't be buying any new Dell equipment either unless your mother increases your allowance or charges you a few dollars a week less to live in her basement and drive her car.

    15. Re:Looks like some great ads by nigham · · Score: 1

      I don't think thats always the case. Notably, Oracle used to (at least upto half a year ago) give aggressive, directed ads against IBM DB2 on the back cover of the Economist.

      IMO, this is a good move by Sun to get out of the the thick heads of management the idea that Dell is the only option. As for being insecure, I seriously doubt they are. In this field, if their servers were no good they'd be taken apart in a day; but they have in fact got pretty good reviews.

      I don't know about you, but I think marketing a product that has three non-mainstream things in it - Sun (vs. Dell), AMD (vs. Intel) and Solaris (vs. Linux/Windows) needs some aggressive campaigning. And I'm pretty happy that its the first time the Opteron is getting the recognition it deserves on a scale thats not limited to people who understand tech in and out.

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    16. Re:Looks like some great ads by dcocos · · Score: 1

      so they are seen in the same class

    17. Re:Looks like some great ads by dcocos · · Score: 1

      I would argue that Oracle was not (is not) not the market leader for %99.999 uptime things. Oracle may be "the shit" to many but banks, insurance companies and exchanges use DB2 (I mean shit the high end DB2 main frames have three processors, in general operation proc 1 and proc 2 compare to make sure that that the results are the same an if they don't agree, they talk to number 3 to decide and before you know it, there is an IBM tech at your door to fix it) this is not the level that Oracle is at yet.

    18. Re:Looks like some great ads by dcocos · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I may be going out on a limb here. But they don't advertise it, they only combat it via PR, there hasn't been an MS commercial on TV that says "We are better than Linux because..." all of the anti-Linux stuff hasn't been in ads but in press releases and seminars.

    19. Re:Looks like some great ads by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Marketing 101 class that I took oh so many years ago."

      Quick, get the holy water!

    20. Re:Looks like some great ads by dcocos · · Score: 1

      Actually I've taken several, this will loose me some /. cred but I have a business degree.
      But I think you agreeing with my point, the non-leaders try to associate with the leaders, while the leaders never mention the others.

    21. Re:Looks like some great ads by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I know I for one would go with the option that bitches 100% less rather than the one that bitches 100% more every time.

    22. Re:Looks like some great ads by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Good point, and valid in general (as rule of thumb). But in this case the market is run by only 3 or 4 companies. It is not as if those who will buy Sun have never heard of Dell and by seeing the add they'll say "Gee, the name 'Dell' comes to mind, I've looked at all the benchmarks and did a cost analysis but I think I'll still buy from this 'Dell' company, their name just comes to mind so often...".

      The point here is that the consumers in this market are different than the consumers in the soft drink market. Spending $50K on a server upgrade is not the same as spending $15 on a Pepsi or a Coke. In the first case there is an evaluation and selection procedure. That is why Sun is incorporating performance comparison figures right into the add "150% faster, 66% more power savings, benchmarks are faster by such and such etc..."

      The soda/pop/carbonated beverage consumer will often have to make a rather impromptu choice. If he is looking through the shelves to buy drinks for the party and Pepsi just happens to come into his mind out of nowhere, because Coke made the mistake of mentioning their name, so he grabs a box of Pepsi and there you go - textbook example of "don't mention your competitor in your ad".

      Sun might be desperate, they might be silly, but they are not totally stupid. I think the ads are pretty good. Their audience are young professional males, probably in their 30s-40s, working in the IT and in IT management. Those people like funny, provocative ads that tell them the facts but also make them laugh. They will instinctively think of all the competitors anyway, to compare products, as there are only 3 or 4 of them, so not much damage is done if Sun also mentiones Dell in the ad.

    23. Re:Looks like some great ads by dcocos · · Score: 1

      Can you show me one ad where Dell compares themselves to Sun?

    24. Re:Looks like some great ads by hhghghghh · · Score: 1

      Usually runner-up brands mention their competitor only by reference, such as "10% cheaper than the Leading Brand"; so as to avoid giving the Leading Brand some Free Advertising.

      Some manufacturers even advertise comparisons against the "Leading Brand" when they also own the Leading Brand, and in some cases they even mention the Leading Brand reference even though the product advertised IS the Leading Brand! (This was the case with Tide, I think).

    25. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm.. most people that can use a sun monitor don't have to ask.

      Err that is, if you have to ask, you'll never know.

      Sun doesn't make desktop monitors like dell does. They make precision monitors with really fast refreshrates and precise drawing. they usualy need some expensive conector that you have to have a dvi output or some special video card to use. If you would have bought it, you probably wouldn't have been able to use it.

    26. Re:Looks like some great ads by Tom-the-Great · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is an ad saying microsoft is less expensive than linux, and in essence better than linux, in every computerworld newspaper I have gotten.

    27. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, they did. What the fuck are you talking about, troll?

    28. Re:Looks like some great ads by willpall · · Score: 1
      Well, yeah and nah. I do see the associations happen a lot (like in my example). But I also see it avoided ("other leading brand"). I'm curious as to how the decision gets made to mention or not.

      Of course I can only speak for myself, but when numerous competitors mention the same market-leader in their advertising, I tend to deduce that the market-leader is the best.

      Basically, the non-leaders should try to associate themselves with the leader while at the same time avoiding re-enforcement of the leader's high brand image. One ad I remember from long ago did this quite well. There was a little-leage game. The winning team was in mid-celebration when an ice chest was opened. It was full of Coke. One boy picks up the can and angrily says, "I thought we won..." Then the Pepsi logo. This is a different scenario from the Honda example in that it outright denegrates the competitor's brand (but with enough humor to avoid looking petty). With all the comparisons to Honda, the other car makers are implicitly acknowledging Honda's general desirability.

      Again, I'm a layperson reflecting on how I react to different marketing ploys; feel free to formalize what I've just said or, umm, yeah.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    29. Re:Looks like some great ads by Decaff · · Score: 1

      The point that you are missing is that ( and this is a rule of marketing) is that the market leader never mentions the any competitors, but the rest of the companies ALWAYS mention the number one company so that potential consumers will equate their product with the market leader.

      Like the way Microsoft never mentions Linux in any of its adverts.

    30. Re:Looks like some great ads by Basehart · · Score: 1

      That's usually the best way to go...never mentioning your competitors by name, unless you're drunk with success like M. Dell a few years ago, spouting off about how fucked Apple is (was ;-))

    31. Re:Looks like some great ads by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Not on TV, but MS has indeed mentioned Linux in magazine ads

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    32. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed. :-)

      you didn't deserve the flamebait mod

    33. Re:Looks like some great ads by fred+ugly · · Score: 1
      Spending $50K on a server upgrade is not the same as spending $15 on a Pepsi or a Coke.
      You're right... spending $50K on a server upgrade is actually a good deal.
    34. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mr. Goatse, is that you?

    35. Re:Looks like some great ads by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This has NOTHING to do with Oracle. This is merely a reflection of one of DB2's native platforms. DB2 isn't "the shit", zOS is. DB2 just comes along for the ride.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    36. Re:Looks like some great ads by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't KILL sun to actually provide this information.

      This pompous attitude simply doesn't cut it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    37. Re:Looks like some great ads by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      those "dinosaurs at the office" ones are a cartload of steaming badger jism
      If you think that you must be an M$ fanboi.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and??? It's pretty well known dell is and has been #1 in the small business *throw away* server market for a LONG time. Were you going somewhere with this?

    39. Re:Looks like some great ads by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      And I thought the $1 cokes in the break room were expensive.

    40. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean - we upgraded our Beowulf 2 years ago, and somehow Dell got word and sent in their goons. We had to keep slapping management - they were like deer in the headlights with all the fancy powerpoint presentations, glossy flyers, marketing schmooze, etc.

      They cost literally twice as much compared to our choice as end-users & admins (Appro FWIW), but management nearly picked them anyway.

    41. Re:Looks like some great ads by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      drgonzo59 said (with the addition of a little bolding):

      Spending $50K on a server upgrade is not the same as spending $15 on a Pepsi or a Coke.

      Even with government pricing, isn't this a little steep for one soda? Makes that server upgrade seem pretty damn reasonable too, I will agree with that.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    42. Re:Looks like some great ads by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      you obviously dont work for a company that buys 50k servers on a whim and then gets me to figure out how to fit it to our needs.

      trust me on this, some people buy computers based on the adds in CIO monthly.

      oh and if your paying 15 bucks for a coke your getting ripped off dude

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    43. Re:Looks like some great ads by Fung_Koo · · Score: 1

      Guppy, start at Psalm 41 and don't stop reading until I tell you!

      The power of Christ compels you!
      The power of Christ compels you!
      --Peter Griffin

      --
      It must be the power of NEGITIVE IONS!!
    44. Re:Looks like some great ads by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Holy water? This is slashdot, we can do better.

      Get me the holy thermite and holy railguns!

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    45. Re:Looks like some great ads by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      A large pack of 24 cans of soda could cost that much.

      But the real problem is that you didn't get the point of the post that the decisions going into buying a server and buying coke are very different and Marketing 101 generalizations don't apply to both instances. So if I wrote $1 or $20, the ratio of that to $50K or $100K would still be large, that is the point. If you had read the whole post you would've understood that instead of seeing $15 and "Pepsi" and then saying "hell no that doesn't cost that much, I better tell everyone".

    46. Re:Looks like some great ads by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Well, if a C(E|I|O)O just throws away $50 for stuff that doesn't fit or work together your company has a problem. Most places don't do that. When you have only a $1 million operating budget and plan to spend 5% of that on a server upgrade, I bet you will look at some specs and benchmarks and even at power consumption.

      I didn't mean $15 for 1 can, I was thinking of a large pack. If you had read you woud've notices "shopping for a party" - you don't really buy 1 can for a party, rather buy a pack. Anyway, that is not even the point of the post. The point was that there is (or there should be at least!) a different kind of decision making when buying something that costs hundreds of thousand and only tens of dollars.

    47. Re:Looks like some great ads by TheJorge · · Score: 1
      It is partially to be seen in the same class, but more importantly is not that the #2 mentions the #1, but that the #1 cannot mention the #2.

      Everyone wants to be able to say "My product is better than product X" but to do so is to acknowledge that (a) product X exists, and (b) that product X is a viable alternative. The best image for a #1 is that they're the only one of their caliber, regardless of how superior their product is. It's negative publicity for someone with market dominance to say "I'm better than #2 by 1000%" even if its true. Customers realize there is an alternative to #1, and that #1 is worried enough about its competition to advertise against them.

    48. Re:Looks like some great ads by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      you seem a little defensive. Oh, if you're getting charged $15 for a 24 pack you're still getting ripped off.

      I regularly buy cases of name brand soda's for my office (i'm a nice guy) and they cost roughly $6/case.. each case holds 24 drinks.

      Sometimes I get an even better deal (particularly if they are cans) and I can get a case for $3-$5 (still name brand, none of that generic grocery store branded stuff).

      I don't think people missed the point of your post. They were just shocked to see you spending $15. I know it caught my eye. I mean, for the average home shopper, a $15 bottle/case for pop is pretty high.

    49. Re:Looks like some great ads by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Not to pick nits, but have you tried contacting your local Sun rep to see if he/she can help? You might just get what you need by asking.

      Also, those products are supported and info is available online, but you do have to have a support contract. I'm wondering if their $99/year deal is still valid that they advertised about a year ago or so.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    50. Re:Looks like some great ads by dublin · · Score: 1

      The 1RU has dual power supplies. I like that. The Dell might as well, but personally I'd buy a Sun over a Dell. But then I'd rather wax my butt crack with an angry wasp than buy a Dell.

      ROFL! Now, that's a colorful comparison...

      I've worked for both Sun and Dell at fairly high levels, and I can tell you one thing for sure: Sun cares a whole lot more than Dell about making sure things work. (I left Dell after (only barely) withstanding intense pressure from multiple Directors and VPs (including Quality!) to ship a cost-saving change that was *guaranteed* to cause Dell laptop customers to lose both data and suspend capability. The argument literally degenerated to, "Who cares? It'll save big bucks and help us meet targets!")

      Sun has its problems to be sure, but it has a culture of doing the right thing, where Dell has a culture of doing whatever optimizes income, regardless of the fallout. (Dell also carefully manages/manipulates the customer experience to make sure that Dell customers "feel loved" and "feel positive about Dell", even though their problems are often not solved.)

      Consider buying Dell if you want stock, but buy Sun if you want a computer, especially one that will just flat work.

      I'm looking at a whole raft of new computers now, and Dell isn't even going to be considered...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    51. Re:Looks like some great ads by DoctorBit · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned in my post, yes I sent email to two Sun contact people. One of those people informed me that no information was available. The other person informed me that information was available with a support contract, and then they furnished partial information in the email (not the specific information I was looking for). It took about twelve hours to get those responses, and by that time the auction had only a few hours remaining.

      I doubt Sun offers support contracts for people who have not yet bought anything from Sun. At any rate, I'm not going to pay $99 per year just to have access to information I'd need to bid on used Sun monitors. Also, I'm concerned with resale value, and unless all the other potential bidders out there also pay $99 per year to Sun, they won't know how much to bid if I try to sell the monitor. I did about an hour of Google searching and found a wide range of conflicting and incomplete specifications listed for the monitor model from a half-dozen vendors. The only way to discern the truth was from Sun, and they're not telling.

    52. Re:Looks like some great ads by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Hehe, sorry didn't mean to be too defensive. Honestly, I don't really buy carbonated beverages (I like tea and water) so I wouldn't really know what the exact price is. But I was just trying to point out the difference in decision making when spending order of magnitude more money.

    53. Re:Looks like some great ads by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      But the real problem is that you didn't get the point of the post that the decisions going into buying a server and buying coke are very different

      Oh, I got the point. I was just making a moderately unrelated slightly humorous observation about your example - at least partially because you said "a Pepsi" which, to most people, implies a single unit - ie: 12-20 fluid ounces. Since I buy both Pepsi (well, Coke, if I'm being honest) and high dollar big ass servers, although usually not at the same time, I alreay understood your official point.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    54. Re:Looks like some great ads by cduffy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but admitting the business degree isn't the sole way you're "loosing" credibility here.

      See the differences between "lose" and "loose".

      (If you're a non-native speaker, please accept my apologies -- it's the folks who grew up with English as a first language and still make these simple mistakes who earn my ire).

    55. Re:Looks like some great ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone really looks at the comparison between the 2 servers in these Ads? Why would you compare a really big 4U box to a 1U ?

      A closer comparison would be the 1850 with 2 dual core procs running Linux..

      The ads are lame, I like sun, allways have, but this really is not a quality comparison between servers...

  3. Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dropping leaflets is the step before shock and awe.
    "Watch out Dell!?" That's a threat if I ever heard one..

  4. News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dell followed up by sending a B-52 on a bomb run over Sun headquarters. Sun was not available for comment.

    1. Re:News at 11 by ramblin+billy · · Score: 4, Funny


      "SUNS GOT AN X64 SERVER...WATCH OUT DELL"

      Hell, I thought they were just gonna toss the thing over the side of the cockpit. With a B-52 they could drop mainframes.

      billy - remember mainframes?

    2. Re:News at 11 by sk8dork · · Score: 0

      wtf? i just looked at the picture of the plane...my first thought was 'omg, couldnt someone do a better job of photochopping that?' of course, this was also influenced by the fact that i WORK at dell, and i SAW the plane, and it said "SUNS GOT AN X64 SERVER...THANKS AMD!!!" so it annoys me that this fake picture was put in the /. article.

      --
      ...all cock-blockery aside...
    3. Re:News at 11 by sk8dork · · Score: 0
      --
      ...all cock-blockery aside...
  5. I am a bit disappointed by HairyCanary · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the text of that ad, you'd think they had -just- now started selling AMD64 servers. I have several Sun AMD64 servers sitting in my server room, and have for quite a while now. Granted, they're just reference boxes -- but they do say Sun on them.

    1. Re:I am a bit disappointed by saleenS281 · · Score: 5, Informative

      no, they "just now" started selling low cost AMD64 servers. They NEVER sold an entry level complete box for 795$ before the latest release. That's the type of market dell held before. IIRC, the cheapest opteron box previously was almost 2k$. Not only that, these new boxes are "all sun" instead of just a rebadged whitebox from a different manufacturer.

    2. Re:I am a bit disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have them? I will be your best friend :O

      ;)

    3. Re:I am a bit disappointed by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why, just last week, I ran through the neighborhood screaming "I HAVE CABLE TELEVISION!". Nobody seemed to care, though.

    4. Re:I am a bit disappointed by dago · · Score: 1

      ... 795$ without hard-disk :(

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    5. Re:I am a bit disappointed by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Well, that's what TFTP is for :)

      You get free stickers in the box though.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    6. Re:I am a bit disappointed by laffer1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've looked at the servers, and they are interesting but certainly not complete.

      1. As another pointed out no hard drive.
      2. No operating system
      3. optical drive and decent warrenty are addons.

      I priced a server out and figure it would be about 1500 dollars once a decent hard drive, warrenty and optical drive are selected. I'm assuming that I don't buy a 150 dollar sun hard drive and instead go to newegg. I also assumed that I upgraded the ram.

      The servers look better than dell's lower lines and i'm very interested, but its not an 800 dollar server by any means.

      Its odd that sun made the amd64 line both their lowend and midrange products. The v100 has been 1000 dollars for quite some time with a 550mhz sparc and a hard drive with solaris and sun one webserver on it. I'm even more confused which processor architecture they are going to use in 3 years. It seems to go from sparc to amd64 and back to sparc. Glad apple said "we're switching" flat out.

      Finally, I'd like to explain the optical drive statement above. 1u servers are also purchased by small businesses and individuals for colocation purposes. Many of us don't have netboot/tftp handy to install operating systems and would need to either buy a dvd drive with the system, hope a sun can boot off an external, pop the drive in another computer for installation, or try to open the case and temporarily hook up a cdrom. Its a hassle. Its good in larger environments not to pay extra from the dvd drive as it would not be needed.

    7. Re:I am a bit disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they boot from external, and notice the handy dandy USB ports right up front? Plug in, install, be happy.

    8. Re:I am a bit disappointed by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      They are blade servers. You keep your RAID-5 SCSI disks in a separate blade, with separate power supply.

    9. Re:I am a bit disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. You know better how big your harddrive will need to be then Sun, maybe you don't even need one.
      2. OS without a harddrive? Anyway, better then an OS tax or an outdated distro CD.
      3. As the other poster mentioned you can use external optical drives or USB sticks, an optical drive in a server is pure waste of money. Don't know about the warranty
    10. Re:I am a bit disappointed by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 1
      I priced a bunch of configured options, and looked at other brand name and smaller brand rackmount servers as well.

      The Sun system was either cost parity +- a few percent or cheaper than competitors with significantly slower CPU configs. And the Sun systems had redundant power and real remote management, which the competition did not.

      Sun has always had better manageability and maintainability than the average bear, but doing it with systems which, fully loaded at Sun component prices, are still parity with low end competitors? That's new. That's new in the PC market for any vendor. People's dual PS remote management card systems generally cost a hell of a lot more than these do.

      As to whether Sun is "switching out" for AMD only... probably not, not until you can build 64 and 128 and larger AMD x64 boxes. Sun makes a lot of money on their big datacenter stuff. I mean, painful large money on it, enough to buy a Space Shuttle.

      I can easily see them stepping away from SPARC over the next few years if the AMD systems scale up nicely, but that's an important if .

  6. Well its official by Momoru · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scott McNealy is officially insane.

    1. Re:Well its official by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Funny
      Scott McNealy is officially insane.
      Yeah, but unlike a certain Utah CEO, it's funny insane, not dangerous tom himself and others insane.
    2. Re:Well its official by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

      This isn't insane at all! This is a very common means by which rival organizations operate.

      Take NASA's reaction to a local threat here.

      Here's the flyover.. . . (Tallahassee Florida)

      http://sun6.dms.state.fl.us/eog_new/eog/library/re leases/2001/february/space_shuttle-02-22-01.html

      Here's the rival organization known as 4-H who is openly spreading secret rocket technology to small children.. . (Tallahassee Florida)

      http://www.florida-agriculture.com/news/10-22-01.h tm

      For those of you who do not know . . The 4-H oranization is involved with helping children with a high DDT PPM count with being more efficient at redneck/farmer activities.

      If I were NASA I would have been very concerned too. A flyover was definately called for in this situation.

      Every redneck should be well versed in rocket technologies. That's not insane either!

    3. Re:Well its official by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is this Tom of which you speak, and why is he so dangerous?

    4. Re:Well its official by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scott McNealy is officially insane.

      You're just now noticing this?

    5. Re:Well its official by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of whom you speak

    6. Re:Well its official by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well its official Scott McNealy is officially insane

      department of redundancy department

    7. Re:Well its official by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1
      Scott McNealy is officially insane.

      Lately, that seems to be a job requirement for CEOs.

      At least he's not throwing chairs.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    8. Re:Well its official by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      I went to elementary school with a kid that threw chairs at people. He also hid under tables and would not come out. He had some pretty severe chemical imbalance in his brain. I wonder what company he is CEO of today.

    9. Re:Well its official by NateTech · · Score: 1

      That's to be debated.

      He made a list of the top five most outrageously overpaid CEO's over at MSN Money recently. (Of course MSN's article writers might be a little biased...)

      Any CEO who thinks they shouldn't take a very large pay cut when their company loses 76% of its value might be considered dangerous -- to their own shareholders.

      As the founder of the Vanguard Fund said in Time magazine this month, we've changed the stock market from a buyer's market to a renter's market and shareholders no longer are in it for the long haul, so they don't complain if the upper management of an organization is gouging them on salary.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  7. or these by b17bmbr · · Score: 0, Troll

    We've got a bigger dick than Dell. or Buy a Sun, get a free blow job.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:or these by Formz · · Score: 1

      Sign me up for Sun!

    2. Re:or these by afree87 · · Score: 1

      Hey, you could get a job at Sun.

    3. Re:or these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The headlines mentioned in the article are:
      • Now that's what we call an ass-whoopin [sic]!
      • 100% more bitchin' than Dell.
      • Rhymes with Hell.
      • Benchmark studies prove that Dell sucks.
      The writer of the article invites everyone to submit their own ideas for headlines, but since mine would probably be rejected, I post them here instead, in increasingly libelous order:
      • Dell can go fuck themselves.
      • Everyone who works at Dell is a communist.
      • Michael Dell is a child molester.
      • Dell is secretly owned by SCO.
  8. Reminds me of QuarkExpress by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't Quark run a bunch of ads that maligned Adobe's product and basically made Quark come off like a bunch of insecure jerks?

    When you have to insult your competition, you insinuate that you are losing to them. Sun looks like they are losing to Dell, which they may very well be, I don't know. But this ad campaign cements that idea.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by richdun · · Score: 1

      403rd Rule of Aquisition - Never make fun of the other guy if it just makes you look like an idiot.

    2. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reminds me of when Sony launched the PlayStation. They sent out a guy in a Crash Bandicoot outfit to harrass Sega execs on the golf course, and caught it all on film.

    3. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by richdun · · Score: 1

      404th Rule of Acquisition - Spell check.

    4. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by cybersaga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you have to insult your competition, you insinuate that you are losing to them.

      Exactly. When you have to spend a lot of time trying to convince people why you're better than someone else, you need to start asking yourself why it's not obvious.

    5. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of when Sony launched the PlayStation. They sent out a guy in a Crash Bandicoot outfit to harrass Sega execs on the golf course, and caught it all on film.

      Or when Microsoft relaunched MSN and our boy Bill dressed as a big purple butterfly and went out and harassed anyone nearby, recording it all with MS cameras.

      Oh, wait... maybe it's not the same thing...

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    6. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, let me think about this. A Dell Xeon comodity PC, labeled "server", running Linux, or a real 64-bit server blade running Solaris for roughly the same money. Hmmm, which one goes in my data center? I know! How about the company who knows what a data center is!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by Aardpig · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if I'm interested in high-performance computing, I'd go with the Dell. I wouldn't touch Sun with a barge-pole performance wise; they're strictly for those who need high availability.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    8. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is still funny. Its all about getting your name in the paper!!!!!!!! Press is press....

    9. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wonder what that says about Linux fanboys bashing M$ ...?

    10. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by Elminst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      anyone have links to the vid of this?

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    11. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by dougmc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, but if I'm interested in high-performance computing, I'd go with the Dell. I wouldn't touch Sun with a barge-pole performance wise; they're strictly for those who need high availability.
      Odd. In my experience, if you need `high performance computing', you've outgrown x86 entirely and so have to ditch Dell and instead get Suns (or IBMs or HPs.) And high availability is thrown in for free ...

      Yes, high end PCs are fast as hell now, and they're competing directly with Suns and IBM's fastest processors, and in the case of raw cpu speed, sometimes they even win. However, PCs have never been able to compete with the I/O bandwidth of the best servers out there, and they still can't.

      (Though I don't know how the new Sun x86_64 boxes do. I suspect they compete nicely with other x86_64 boxes, but that the big Sun machines still beat them, especially in I/O. But when it comes to performance for a given price, it's been hard to beat a good PC for quite some time now, and I don't see this changing any time soon.)

      As for high availability, you can have that with x86, x86_64, Sparc, RS6K, PPC, whatever. The good server boxes have basically caught up with what the servers have had for a long time -- redundant power supplies, RAID, etc. And of course you can't really have a high availability environment with a single computer anyways ...

    12. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by hritcu · · Score: 1

      Sorry to wake you up, but we live in a world in which "build it and they will come" simply doesn't work any more.

      Sun advertising their products as "the real thing" on the server market, as opposed to Dell's jokes, is pretty normal. I just have to wonder why didn't they do it earlier?

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    13. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Didn't Quark run a bunch of ads that maligned Adobe's product and basically made Quark come off like a bunch of insecure jerks?

      Didn't Dell, in the early days (like the late 1980's), run advertisements bragging how their machines were IBM compatible but bragging that they were better and faster than IBM machines?

    14. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

      We're sorry but that rule can't be found.

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    15. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It helps to not be a Sun fanboy.

      It is the Sun hardware that is the antithesis of high performance. Sure, you can cobble together a glorified Beowulf cluster in the form of a SunFire. However, IO is still going to be a problem.

      You are confusing Suns with mainframes.

      x86 is merely taking the place once occupied by Alpha.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a reference to an ad campaign they did for crash bandicoot. i assure you, it was not real.

    17. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by dougmc · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      It helps to not be a Sun fanboy.
      I'm not. But thanks for playing.
      You are confusing Suns with mainframes.
      No, I'm not.

      Though the lines between microcomputers, minicomputers and mainframes are not lines at all. Perhaps they once were, but now it's one big blur. In any event, Sun makes machines that fit into all three categories (and so does most everybody else.)

      x86 is merely taking the place once occupied by Alpha.
      Taking? They've been competing since the Alpha was introduced, and it's pretty obvious who won.

      Unless you meant that x86_64 is taking the niche once occupied by Alpha -- fast, but still low end 64 bit cpus. In which case I'd have to say `thank you, Captain Obvious!'

    18. Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, sir, you would be +5 funny.

      Best subtle joke of the day.

  9. Energy Savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you notice the ads that didn't make it all have a different energy savings %? One says 56% energy savings, one says 66%, the other says 63%.

    Why not just go with something like "A bagillion times the engery savings over Hell - oh, tee-hee - we mean 'Dell'".

    1. Re:Energy Savings by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Hmmm 3 different energy savings... I wonder why that could be... hmmmm let me read the article again... OOOHHHHH perhaps it's because they're adverts for the "Sun Fire tm X2100, X4100, and X4200" - that'd be 3 different machines then!

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  10. Inflammatory by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 1

    Seems like SUN let their middle-school aged kids run their marketing department. "Studies show that DELL sucks"? Bitchin'? Ass-whooping?

    Maybe some nascar fans too?

    On a side note, it's quite interesting to see SUN, who used to be *the* big player do anything to grab some press.

    1. Re:Inflammatory by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative
      On a side note, it's quite interesting to see SUN, who used to be *the* big player do anything to grab some press.

      You act like this is new for Sun. Let's not forget that this is the same Sun that sent a boatload of exterminator trucks to the Windows 2000 launch just to remind everyone that Win2K had 65,000 bugs in it. Or the constant bickering between Sun and IBM.
      IBM: We're going to *Eclipse* the competition.
      Sun: Let's *shine some light* on IBM's claims.

      Not to mention McNealy's comments about HP: "They make great printers!"

      Nope, nothing new under the Sun.
    2. Re:Inflammatory by biscayne07 · · Score: 1

      Thank god for execs and marketing departments that can make-and take-a joke.

  11. desperation? by weighn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    the old "bold ad campaign" eh?

    I know jack about marketing, but this stinks of desperation.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:desperation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know jack about marketing, but this stinks of desperation.

      Kind of like other ad campaigns by Sun.

    2. Re:desperation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows about their ad campaign now. That's a good thing for Sun. You're right -- you know jack about marketing.

      Regardless of whether Sun was at the top or the bottom of the server market, they would want an ad campaign that works. Your post stinks of stupidism.

    3. Re:desperation? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      But you know something, it might just work. The idea is to get your message out loud and clear in times when the market is quite. Thus, everyone takes notice at you.

      Personally, I find the "bold ad campaign" and oldie-but-goodie method.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:desperation? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
      the old "bold ad campaign" eh?

      Yeah, I don't see what's so special about it. I mean, doesn't the Sun fly over Dell's buildings, like, every day anyways?

    5. Re:desperation? by Pax00 · · Score: 1

      Really I think this is some of the best advertising that I have seen in quite some time... it is witty...

      the thing to remember about advertising is that you want people to remember the add...

      just like a jingle or something.. something to stick in peoples head...

      if I were to say:

      "Plop Plop Fizz Fizz"

      you would probably be able to finish it and tell me what it is an add for...

      same concept is being used here.. something to stick in your head...

    6. Re:desperation? by reidleake · · Score: 1
      At least by your own admission you 'know jack about marketing'. Take a look at the adds, they are funny and clever.

      This has already been a marketing success in at least one aspect - it has garnered free press.

    7. Re:desperation? by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Twins in an acid bath?

      I dunno, I never heard that in any ad.

    8. Re:desperation? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Except this is a corporate server vendor, not some shock rock band. CIOs aren't going to automagically flock to Suns side just because momma can't stand them. They're going to have their people actually look into the claims and report back.

              Sun made the mistake of making this about money (rather than quality or dependability). It's easy enough for Dell to move the bar again if they have to.

              What I personally got out of the add is that they focus on single toy benchmarks (like Apple) and neglect important details (like their pricepoint doesn't include disks). Neither one reflects well on an enterprise server vendor.

              These ads do make them look more like Dell, but in a bad way.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:desperation? by tpv · · Score: 1
      their pricepoint doesn't include disks

      One word: SAN

      We have servers that ship with internal mirrored SCSI, and the only things we have on the drives are the OS and tmp.
      I much prefer my vendor not to try and guess what my storage needs are.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
  12. Politicians by mysqlrocks · · Score: 0

    Is Sun trying to do what politicians do and focus on negative advertising campaigns?

  13. Idiots by elronxenu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps Sun could learn to promote their products on their own merits, rather than insulting a competitor.

    1. Re:Idiots by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 1

      Nope, they learned their lesson from the presidential campaign.

    2. Re:Idiots by nametaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But then it wouldn't have made digg.com, /., and thousands of other major sites.

      Whats the point of a mature ad campaign that nobody notices. An obnoxious one is almost always better. Just ask AFLAK.

      So that's my take. Can you hear me now?

    3. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yeah. Using colorful speech sucks. Big ones. Really.

      All kidding aside, I think that Sun should lose their marketing folks. An intelligent ad campaign could point up the failings of the competition without resorting to the graphic slang. Dell is such an easy target on the basis of their tech support, alone.

      When people (or companies) are respectful of their (deficient) competitiors they come out looking stronger. Who can afford to be more magnanimous, a statesman or a panhandler? (I won't get into who is objectively more likely to give to a charitable cause -- image and reality aren't the same thing.)

    4. Re:Idiots by minion · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Perhaps Sun could learn to promote their products on their own merits, rather than insulting a competitor.
       
      I think those ads speak very well of Sun's merits.
      A) Sun's servers use less power
      B)Sun's servers put off less heat
      C)Sun's servers are faster than Dell's.
       
      Really, one thing to consider here: Sun makes an OS, makes CPUs, makes chipsets.. And we're not talking just the fabrication. They have engineers designing this stuff... What has Dell ever developed? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. They've developed nothing, except for a business model that takes other people's desgins and hard work, and mass produces them so each unit can make a $5 profit, and hope that they'll sell a million units.
       
      They are the leech of the industry, and with our patronage, future R&D is in grave trouble, because they give nothing back to the community.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    5. Re:Idiots by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Perhaps Sun could learn to promote their products on their own merits, rather than insulting a competitor.

      They're taking a page from Microsofts book: if your product really isn't that much better than what the competition offers, instead spend your money on insulting and belittling that competition. The approach isn't a smart one and yes, it smacks of desperation - just as when MS comes out with another 'study' about how Linux really is much more expensive than Windows - honest! No, really, honest guys, we're not kidding!

      Makes the whole lot sound like a bunch of whiny, resentful 14-year-old geeks who just figured out that they'll *never* be dating a cheerleader.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    6. Re:Idiots by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whats the point of a mature ad campaign that nobody notices. An obnoxious one is almost always better.

      That would be a valid point if you were selling soft drinks to teenagers. Then, plublicity is everything. Instead, you are selling servers to people who spend a lot of money on computers. People like that are generally not particularly impressed by childish, insecure ads. While you are allowed to have brash, bold, ad campaings, the general rule in corporate "stuff" advertising is NEVER ADVERTISE YOUR COMPETITION. If you do, the target of the campaign might get the idea that you are tyring a Jedi Mind Trick on him, and figure out that maybe he/she should take a closer look at the company your ad is telling him to ignore.

      Ads that extol how great your stuff is are taken far more seriously than ads that say how much your competition sucks.

      You can come up with a witty, fun way to do this (IBM's ads come to mind), without resorting to childish insults. (Sun Example: "Their servers run on twice the power and are slow [or something like that]. No wonder their name rhymes with HELL.")

      Gimme a break... this is schoolyard recess crap. Most of us outgrew this in fourth grade.

      SirWired

    7. Re:Idiots by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Unless you are in a closet... you already know about Dell.

      Chances are you probably have one in your corporate office already.

      Maybe I'm strange, but I found it funny. Too bad I just ordered new systems or I would have picked up a couple of their low end systems.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    8. Re:Idiots by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

      The main reason why Sun doesn't mind drawing attention to Dell is that they know their new "Galaxy" servers kick the ass of what Dell currently offers. They're cheaper, faster, smaller, and use less power.
       
      And I must say, I did find those ads most amusing at first, and even more so when i researched the benchmarks and found the statements to be (mostly) accurate.
       
      Plus they're only making fun of Dell to point out that they're working to enter the low end space (which Dell controls) and that they now have comparable products to Dell's offerings in that area, not because they lack the brand recognition of Dell and are trying too "mooch off of the Dell name". Show me anyone in the IT industry who doesn't know about both Sun and Dell, and I'll show you a person who'll be first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    9. Re:Idiots by ScuxxletButt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gimme a break... this is schoolyard recess crap. Most of us outgrew this in fourth grade.

      You are talking about a country full of consumers that made Pet Rocks a top selling item for Christmas several years in a row. This kind of advertising does work. It's sad, but it's true.

    10. Re:Idiots by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      While you are allowed to have brash, bold, ad campaings, the general rule in corporate "stuff" advertising is NEVER ADVERTISE YOUR COMPETITION. If you do, the target of the campaign might get the idea that you are tyring a Jedi Mind Trick on him, and figure out that maybe he/she should take a closer look at the company your ad is telling him to ignore.

      In the market for low-end servers, Dell is the incumbent. Sun is the new-comer. Therefore it is a given that the customer is looking at Dell. Sun is trying to get them to also notice Sun. This is no different than the Apple "switcher" situation of a few years ago which was mostly well-received.

    11. Re:Idiots by popeyethesailor · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They are the leech of the industry, and with our patronage, future R&D is in grave trouble, because they give nothing back to the community.

      Sorry, but this statement is total bullshit. Nothing back to the community ? Giving the customer a much better price-performance than everybody else means nothing?

      I agree with most of your comment, Sun's boxes are usually better engineered. However, innovation does not always have to be in the technical domain; there's as much innovation happening in other fields, including marketing. Would you say Amazon.com has done nothing interesting because they did not invent any of their products? If Dell's products are so poor, why does Sun feel the need to compare themselves with Dell?

    12. Re:Idiots by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This of course ignores the fact that those making purchasing decisions in those "low-end" shops aren't doing so in a vacuum. Your target systems analyst may infact be an SCSA and already pre-disposed to buying Suns (if not for cost).

      You really don't want to interfere with that.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    13. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no different than the Apple "switcher" situation of a few years ago which was mostly well-received.

      They were? I thought they just reinforced the notion that Apple users were too stupid for a PC.

    14. Re:Idiots by nyri · · Score: 1

      What has Dell ever developed? Nothing.

      Sorry to break this to you but mass production isn't exactly "nothing". It may look trivial but that's just because you have never tried to figure out how to take 1,000 different parts, put them together, repeat 100,000 times a day and then ship ready made computers around the world while allowing a high level of customization. This is, of course, done by Dell. Above the process itself they have managed to get it quite fault tolerant and cheap.

    15. Re:Idiots by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I just snorted a lung through my nose.

      better price-performance than everybody else

      You're thinking 1998. These days Dells are vendor locked propeitary boxes with substandard components, backed by the worst tech support I've ever had the displeasure of dealing with. I just spent a week trying to get them to take back a laptop that was DOA. A FRICKING WEEK.

      I'll never buy another Dell.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    16. Re:Idiots by zrk · · Score: 1

      So, Pepsi is really a bunch of 4th graders? That would explain their use of Micheal Jackson a few years back, though.

    17. Re:Idiots by sirwired · · Score: 1

      You can MENTION competitors in ads (i.e. comparison benchmarks), but you shouldn't be drawing attention to them. Yes, Dell is the entrenched company they are trying to toss, but "Dell Rhymes with Hell" or "Dell Sucks" is not going to impress anybody.

      For me, anyway, I am LESS likely to believe their claims if this is what they need to do to get attention. I am impressed by results, by numbers, not childish ads.

      SirWired

      P.S.

      The "switcher" campaign was:
      1) a bunch of plain-vanilla customer testimonials. It mentioned Microsoft, but it was not the "point" of the ad. The ads were mostly about how much the new users liked their Macs, not how much they hated their Windows.
      2) completely ineffective. Apple's PC marketshare isn't any higher than it was before the campaign.

    18. Re:Idiots by linguae · · Score: 1

      Sun and Dell are innovative and successful corporations, just in different ways. Sun's innovations are in processors (the UltraSPARC), OSes (Solaris), and in languages (Java). Dell's innovation is building decent computers at competitive prices (even if they aren't technically the best), and at mass production.


      I, for one, would rather buy a Sun UltraSPARC workstation than a Dell Pentium 4 or Xeon workstation any day of the week. However, Dell is doing better financially because they are able to sell their products (usually) at much cheaper prices than what Sun sells their products for. Plus, not everybody needs the power of a Sun workstation. However, there is a huge difference in quality between a Sun workstation and a Dell workstation. Sun is kind of like Apple; their computers may start out at higher prices, but your purchase is worth every dime.

    19. Re:Idiots by minion · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this statement is total bullshit. Nothing back to the community ? Giving the customer a much better price-performance than everybody else means nothing?
       
      It means absolutely nothing. We (humans) are bargin hunters. At least the masses are, because they don't understand quality, they understand quantity. Therefore, Dell's business model is sound. They should continue to do very well in the market place, and will probably put many of their competitors out of business...
       
      This is where the trouble comes in. Their competitors are the ones designing the new technology that Dell makes a buck on. Not Dell. You can rant and rave all you want about assembly lines, mass production, cheap computers, yada yada yada, but in the end, when Dell has eaten the competition, there will be nothing to sustain Dell either, because Dell spends ZERO on R&D.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  14. Go to Dell by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Want a new computer?

    What don't you all just go to Dell!
    Easy as Hell! (whoops!)

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  15. New resume item by most_unique_name · · Score: 1

    Nowadays when sending in an application to a giant software or hardware firm it's important to include a copy of your pilot's license and logbook. CS students may want to look into taking flying lessons on the side.

    1. Re:New resume item by Ride+Jib · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you are applying for a job at Sun in this case, you should add (under Honors/Awards) 3rd Grade - Beat Johnny on the playground in name calling contest.

  16. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But don't most server admins know the benefits, and won't they have already done the research on what they want to buy?

    You think server admins usually get to choose what to buy?

    I don't think so.

    It looks to me the ads are probably targeted at getting the mindshare of PHB types.

  17. First thought by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1

    First thought was from my good friend Mr. Travolta (not really, not legal mess please):

    "...'atsa bol' statement."

    i've always kinda liked Sun (grew up on 'em) and even when things seem dark, Sun and Co. come up with something that is pretty damn bold ... and deliver from time to time. Jonathan, at times, seems a little too quick to shoot that mouth off, but damn, sometimes they do come up with some rock solid stuff. At least they have some humor in their bold statements. Makes me wanna see if the balls match the hype.

    1. Re:First thought by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know that Sun antagonizes the linux world to some extent but even so, I respect the company. It has given me OpenOffice -- a suite I use almost daily (I don't work on weekends). Several years ago I bought a copy of StarOffice to show my appreciation -- but I've been using OpenOffice and all the upgrades since for a sum total of the 60-70 bucks I voluntarily spent on Star Office (can't recall the exact price anymore). In all honesty, I owe Sun a good amount of appreciation, and I hope they do kick some Dell butt.

      Plus, they have some really nice looking hardware. I'm seriously considering replacing my home built, "sides taken off because it gets too hot and crashes during gzipping of backups" monstrosity I have sitting here.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:First thought by humina · · Score: 1

      Considering that Sun contributes more to open source than apple, you'd think that there would be a bigger group of Sun fanboys than apple fanboys. I don't think dell contributes anything to the open source community. Based on this I hope that Sun does well, Apple does ok, and dell does badly.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    3. Re:First thought by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 1
      You could count me as one of those Sun fanboys. I have been very happy with Sun hardware. Almost all of their boxes on which I've worked have never had a hardware failure. I even have a really old e250 that is still cranking along ;)

      I'm well pleased that they have diversified their product offering. It's nice to know that you can use one vendor for most of your server needs, regardless of platform, and with support for multiple OS's.

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    4. Re:First thought by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      I even have a really old e250 that is still cranking along ;)

      Where I work we've still got a bunch of SparcStation 5 and 20s in the server room. They just run and run.

  18. They have a point by hey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dell is crap.

    1. Re:They have a point by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Dell is crap.

      True dat.

  19. Link to the Quark ads by ReformedExCon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  20. From an advertising copywriter... by switcha · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I know it doesn't give me any authority, as consumers are the real gauge of how effective an ad is, but holy crap, those are awful ads. First off, they do almost as much pitching for the competition as they do Sun. Second, .. well, they just plain suck. Word play and throwing in a useless mild swear word isn't a hallmark of "bold", just an unimaginative mind.

    I'm gonna go wash the taste of those out of my mouth now...

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    1. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by toolo · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious the end is near for Sun. It seems that the specific ad you are speaking about is targetted towards kids who need a cheap Linux box to host shell accounts.

    2. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by archier · · Score: 1


      the ads suck but the comparative stats look pretty good: faster, cheaper, and saves on the electric bills. why buy dell?

    3. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by buysse · · Score: 1
      My favorite bad ad of all time was from Subway. Now, Subway has had some bad ads around, but this one was just wonderful.

      The ad was on the radio, and it was for some chipotle-chicken sub or something, and it had this little jingle that just went, "Chipotle! Chipotle! da da da, Chipotle!"

      The problem came in when I didn't realize that it was an ad for Subway. I thought it was an ad for Chipotle, not Subway.

      These aren't that bad by comparison.

      --
      -30-
    4. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by rascal1182 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but do you remember the ad campaign from Motorola that used The Rolling Stones' "You Can't Always Get What You Want" as the theme song?

      I actually liked the "benchmark studies prove that Dell sucks" one - honest and to the point.

      --

      "Yarrgh! I be just a paintin' of a head..."
    5. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by Lehk228 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the ad doesn't suck... we are all sitting around slashdot talking about servers almost none of us were previously interested in but here we are talking about them, and looking up system specs on them. This ad will work quite well to stir up a buzz about Sun's servers.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. how the fuck is some bullshit coppertone banner crap 'bold'? what's next? 30 second TV spots? Radio ads? I got it! A neon sign in Time's square that says "SUN".

    7. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna go wash the taste of those out of my mouth now..

      Did you lick the screen? Where did it say that?! What advertisers will do today!

      Ironically my capatcha is 'decency'.

    8. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by humina · · Score: 1

      So true. I was going to look up specs and compare servers until I realized that I would be falling for the marketing trap. I refuse to care until I have to buy one (which hopefully won't be for another few years).

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    9. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      My favorite: the old Outback Steakhouse ad where they sic a pack of starving wolves on a high school marching band, complete with screams of terror. Then the announcer turns to the camera, grins, and says "Now that's good stuff!"

      My wife and I saw that for the first time while eating at a restaurant in Durango, Colorado. Nearly choked on my pasta, it was so funny. Too bad they stopped doing these commercials (way too many complaints from the stiff-necked types).

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    10. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by Pax00 · · Score: 1

      so then what is a good ad?
       
      I mean really... you are talking about it right? it is in your head... you are going to remember it... they could have gone back to a tried and true method and used the swedish bikini team... they used wit... imply playboy but not out right said playboy... oh.. they use the typical layout with the 3rd up rule in bold letters "Hell" it caught your attention.. and then the angles in the image brought your eyes down to the important information... where is the problem?

    11. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      I thought that was an Outpost.com ad? But yea, that was the best (and possibly only good) ad ever.

    12. Re:From an advertising copywriter... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      I think too that the end is near for Sun... They're too top-heavy, too many competitors in the market they're in who have been doing this for a while.

      If you want cheap rackmounts: http://rackmountsetc.com/
      if you want good rackmounts: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/ (wikimedia bought their latest servers from there)
      (check out these little bastards: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/c316/dual-opteron. php )

      Yes, from webhostingtalk.com

      Let's not forget, however, that the kids who buy dedicated machines to colo are usually the same kids who run business services for the local mom and pops, and who, as a whole, have been a large community of dell 1U buyers.

      So I give it to Sun to actually recognize their market.

      An advice for Sun:

      Jonathan, if you want the geeks to take you seriously, come and open a slashdot account and post here. You'll get your boots dirty, but at least you'll know what it feels like in the trenches.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  21. It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by postbigbang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And they're not the first ones to try and embarrass Sun on Sun's turf. Galaxy-Class servers. Gene Roddenberry is rolling in his grave. Folks, this is a 1U, 2-64 CPU machine. Nice. But just wait a short while and multi-cores will blow this stuff away-- before the end of the year you can get four (then more) 64-bit cores in a 1U, and stuff it with enough RAM to make a real difference. Please watch the Tom and Dick Smothers-- oops I mean Scott and Jonathon-- Show for more details. And it's Schwartz playing bass.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by buysse · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ummm.... the Sun 4100 is a 1U, 4-core box -- available now. It can be stacked with 16G of memory and up to four disks (2.5" SAS [Serial Attached Storage]), or two disks and an optical drive.

      The 2100 is basically a reference design -- the 4100 and 4200 boxes are designed entirely by Sun and are most excellent.

      --
      -30-
    2. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      They're doing dual core chips with just the 90nm tech. With Intel's new 64nm fabs, it won't be long before quad cores come out.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    3. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually only the 4200 can have 4 disks, and they top out at 72GB capacity. I just did a quick price comparison to an HP server I'm specing for next fiscal year. From Sun I get a 2U server with a single dual core cpu, 4GB of ram, 3 year 24x7 hardware only support, dual PSU's, and 4x72GB 10K rpm drives for $7,700. For about the same price from HP I can get a 2U server with dual single core cpu's, 4GB of ram, 3 year 24x7 total support, dual PSU's, and 3x146GB 15K rpm drive with room for three more drives for future expandability. At least for my application (new AD controller and file server) the HP is the hands down winner.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by IckySplat · · Score: 1

      I've bought HP servers in the past (or rather my PHB did on my recommendation)
      The price was great, They were HP/Compaq machines which were in my opinion at the time a good brand

      Then the servers started blowing up random components. Not just one of them! 3 of them.
      A couple of months later same machines died again same fault on the new parts.

      Remember .... You get what you pay for :(

      Much downtime
      Much phoning HP support
      Not much engineer on site

      VERY VERY bad week for this geek.
      And I won't recommend HP for anything anymore

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
    5. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      I had bad experiences going from Digital to Compaq and then from Compaq to HP. Somewhere along the line, all the DEC expertise with clustering and RAID hardware just disappeared. Perhaps that expertise was what HP thought they were getting when they bought Compaq, but both companies RAID hardware screws up on a regular basis. I'm glad to be back on Sun hardware again ...

    6. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by afidel · · Score: 1

      Let's see:
      IBM -problems with bad capacitors on motherboards of certain e-server models

      Sun -problems with cache corruption on Ultrasparc 2 -450's that took several years for Sun to own up to

      Dell -Problems with more than 2 banks of ram on 2650 servers

      Those are just some of the problems I can rember off the top of my head. The fact is at some time every manufacturer has a product that has problems, to me the difference is in how they deal with it and how pervasive such problems are.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by IckySplat · · Score: 1

      I completely agree.
      I've worked with SUN gear for many years and yes I've seen their gear fail.
      But then I've also seen many other vendors gear fail too.

      The difference is that when one of my Sun servers blow a gasket,
      I call sun & depending on the service level I've bought
      I have an answer within the hour & an engineer on-site within 4.
      Actually these days I'm running silver support on most machines and platinum on only a couple.
      I think from memory 4 hour responce & parts and engineer next day.
      I have exactly the same server contract with HP. When my two production HP servers blew up
      They told me it would take 2 WEEKS for the parts to arrive. I had to argue with them to even get an engineer on-site!

      I remember the cache problem that Sun had.
      They caught a lot of flak over that one.
      They seemed to have learned their lesson :)

      Maybe I've been lucky, but Sun support has always been top notch. HP's support so far has sucked.
      I've never had to deal with IBM so I can't really comment.

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
    8. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by buysse · · Score: 1
      No, both the 4200 and 4100 can handle 4 SAS disks. The difference is that the 1U box, the 4100, can only handle 4 disks if you *don't* install an optical drive. Generally, in the Sun world, there's not much use for an optical anyway, and in the rare case that it's "needed," you can boot from an external USB.

      Network installs are the way of the future. ;)

      --
      -30-
    9. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well the Sun online store doesn't agree with you, I could not make it give me the option for four HDD's no matter what configuration changes I made. Either way only 4 10K RPM drives in a 2U enclosure sucks. And yes I am very familiar with jumpstart, and have been doing them since I was first introduced to Sun kit a decade ago, the future is yesterday =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose by buysse · · Score: 1
      That's pretty f*cked up right there. The specs for the box clearly state that it will work with four drives. From the Sun store page listing entry-level servers:
      Sun Fire X4100 Server
      Fast, reliable, and energy-efficient x64 server that runs Solaris OS, Linux, and Windows.
      • Up to 2 dual- or single-core AMD Opteron 200 Series processors
      • Up to 16 GB of memory
      • Up to two disk drives with DVD-ROM or up to four disk drives without DVD-ROM
      • 1U high form factor
      I don't know why it won't let us actually configure it that way. And yes, only four 73G drives is pretty weak.
      --
      -30-
  22. More that they rejected by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Funny

    -Not yellow box, but Sun love you long time.
    -Dell Sucks: Sun swallows. You owe us one. Buy our servers.
    -No, that's not IBM biting my ass. DELL SUCKS.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:More that they rejected by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      your nick is funny. but mine is the Real Deal.

    2. Re:More that they rejected by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      FOR THE RECORD

      I chose my nickname immediately after reading yours. It was a depraved act of blatant plagarism.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:More that they rejected by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      Yours is more Black sounding. I am a honkey.

  23. Sun selling commodity hardware is big news? by cprice · · Score: 1

    Wtf?

    This is plain ol server gear. Sun is very late to the commodity x86 platform and they want to trump it up? Sure the product has a slight differentiation with AMD64, but I know that HP has AMD64 offerings in 4 and 8 way systems.

    Sun should have released cost effective gear like the 240, 440, 20z, 40z and these new boxen 3 years ago instead of milking customers for 50 grand (CDN) a pop for 420R servers.

    1. Re:Sun selling commodity hardware is big news? by Mateito · · Score: 1

      The differentiator will come out later with more cores. The funky bit about Bechilstienenen's (sp) design is to do with CPU and Memory scaling. SPARC and other RISC architectures have always been pretty good, but x86 isn't that great after about 4 processors. So what we are going to see is an 8 way, dual core x86-64 box that scales closer to linear than anything else. D

    2. Re:Sun selling commodity hardware is big news? by joib · · Score: 1


      The differentiator will come out later with more cores. The funky bit about Bechilstienenen's (sp) design is to do with CPU and Memory scaling.


      Actually, I highly doubt it. As you might know the Opteron has an integrated on-die memory controller. Ripping that out and replacing it (that is, manufacturing another chip entirely) with something Sun-specific would destroy the x86 economies of scale that is the entire point of this line of servers.

    3. Re:Sun selling commodity hardware is big news? by Wiz · · Score: 1

      How can they differentiate themselves? Opterons have on-board memory controllers, so as long they are all connected then there is little else you can do.

      Read the v20z and X4100 specs. Oh look, same memory controller, same chipset, etc. There is nothing they can change to make any particular difference.

      The Sun v40z will scale well, and is a dual core x86-64 server not made by Sun. I'm sure the DL585 from HP will do the same job because they use exactly the same memory technology.

      The only magic you can do with Opterons is when you go above 8 sockets, and you need some logic (which Newisys is making) to get above that.

  24. Haha by Mishra100 · · Score: 1

    Thats awesome. Think of it as the normal employee. If he were to walk out after a long day and see that, he would just have to chuckle. It would make his day!

    I think silly advertizing is a lot better than Microsoft's way of kicking you right out the door. There are a lot of things that Sun could have done worse, so I favor them doing something that might amuse some people.

    1. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It got a smile out of the repressed engineer who may secretly like AMD but can't admit to it in public. Engineers at Dell have about as much input as the secretary when it comes to vendor selection.

  25. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Steepe · · Score: 1

    I spec and purchase all my servers. well, me or the other sysadmin do.

    Wouldn't work at a place where the PHB made technology purchasing decisions.

    --
    Just three more hours seapeople and you can finally take me away from this crappy God Damned planet full of hippies
  26. Re:Unfortunately... by bajan_on_ice · · Score: 5, Informative

    Err, have you NOT been reading slashdot for the last couple of days? This is what these ads are all about. AMD Opteron boxes for cheaper than Dell sells em and faster as well. New designs by Andy Bechtolsteim (sic), who is widely regarded as one of the best server designers...

    Oh, and I think these boxes are supported by Sun for Windows, Linux (Redhat and Suse) and of course Solaris.

    And of course they push Solaris. Some people actually think that it MIGHT be a better Unix that Linux (Moderators, you didnt read that...)

    --
    "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
  27. Inconsistencies? by chis101 · · Score: 1

    I understand these are just 'drafts' of ads, but they can't even decide on numbers. "50% faster, 66% more energy efficient" "In independent lab tests versus Dell, engineers concluded it saved 56% in energy costs" "About 63% more energy than the new industry standard Sun x64 server" Come on, is it 56%, 63% or 66%? At least make all of your ads say the same thing.

    1. Re:Inconsistencies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure they aren't talking about different models?

  28. No kidding by dsginter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The yutzes over at Sun's marketing team don't even know what their talking about. What's an "x64" server? Do they mean "64-bit" or have they shaved x86 down to size?

    --
    More
    1. Re:No kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "x64" is the brand name of their server. It's not the chip architecture, it's not the bit-size of the chip, it's the brand name.

    2. Re:No kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > don't even know what their talking about.

      "their" is a possessive, I think what you meant was "they're" or "they are".

    3. Re:No kidding by Mateito · · Score: 1, Informative

      "x64" is compression of "x86-64", namely the instruction set developed by AMD to extend the capabilities of the old x86 yet again. What was it? 8088 - 8 bit instructions 8086 - 16 bit instructions with 8 bit channel 80386 - Pentium - went 32 bit somewhere in here. For 64 bit, Intel decided to develop a new, more efficient instruction set to get rid of all these generations of crap. That was Itanium. It didn't work as there were no applications, and people didn't want to move across. This opened a window of opportunity which AMD filled. Intel will catchup, but AMD have between 6 and 18 months to enjoy the spoils.

    4. Re:No kidding by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, the 8088 and the 8086 were both 16-bit CPUs that took 16-bit instructions. The 8088 was only "8-bit" in that it had an 8-bit data bus, internally it was 16 bits wide.

      The 8-bit progenitor of these was the 8080. The 8086/8088 were designed to be assembly-compatible with the 8080, but not binary-compatible. (i.e. you took your 8080 assembly and ran it in an 8086 assembler that was 8080-aware and it would produce working code with little-to-no tweaking).

    5. Re:No kidding by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wikipedia claims that the first 32-bit chip in the x86 line was the 386DX.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    6. Re:No kidding by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, it's so hard for advertisers to type in 3 extra characters...

      They should have reduced it further to "4", which is equally meaningless and which would further reduce the strain on their poor little fingers.

      Advertising, working your fingers to stubs typing arcane industry acronyms for mere millions. A tough life I tell you.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    7. Re:No kidding by 4of12 · · Score: 1
      "x64" is compression of "x86-64"

      Wait a minute, assuming "x86" is hex due to the prefix, and 64 decimal, or 0x40, I get

      0x86
      - 64
      ----
      0x46
      Which is 70 base 10.

      Or one more than 69.

      This won't be on the final, will it?

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    8. Re:No kidding by chrish · · Score: 1

      The x is for EXTREME!!1!!!! So it's really "EXTREME!!1!!!! 64!!"

      I'm waiting for the Extreme Pro Gold Ultra Enterprise 64 Edition chips.

      --
      - chrish
    9. Re:No kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, they've already announced those. I'm holding out for Extreme Pro Platinum ne plus Ultra Turbo Street Fighter 64+ chips, that I heard one of my buddies say he read somebody saw on a discarded Power Point printout in a dumpster. Supposed to give 6% better heat dissipation, and that translates to real power!

    10. Re:No kidding by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      It was. Although I think the 32bit data-bus was only added in 486DX

    11. Re:No kidding by Gruturo · · Score: 1

      It was. Although I think the 32bit data-bus was only added in 486DX

      Nope, it was the 386DX. Actually, "DX" originally stood for Doubleword eXchange (32bit bus) and SX for "Singleword eXchange" (thus 16bit bus).

      The first to come out was the 386DX, then they made the 386SX which was nearly 100% pin-compatible with the 80286 and thus appealed many motherboard manufacturers and people on a cheap budget.

      The 80486 took the DX-SX to a different meaning: the DX version had an integrated math coprocessor, the SX didn't (although 486SX CPUs were long rumored to be 486DX cores in which the FPU failed factory tests).

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
  29. Daisolaris by Galaga88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sun Microsystems is about to make you its bitch!

    (Because we know how well *that* campaign is remembered.)

  30. wow by Tsiangkun · · Score: 5, Funny

    20 comments, and the images are still available. I guess the new servers are ass-kickin machines.

  31. ps by DonniKatz · · Score: 1, Funny

    PLEASE for the love of god let there be a photoshopcontest

    1. Re:ps by friek · · Score: 0

      PLEASE for the love of god don't let fark do a ps contest on this!

    2. Re:ps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first photoshop! (Or GIMP, at least.)

      link 1
      link 2

    3. Re:ps by Angwe · · Score: 1

      Do you really need a PS contest on this?

      --
      Curiosity?!? My ass! He stole shit! -T. Carpenter
  32. Shades of Daikatana by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Scott McNealy is going to make Dell his bitch"

    Worked well for John Romero, I'm sure it would work great for Sun.
    I'm just surprised they didn't call the server line "Xtreeeme64".

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  33. Will they lie in this one too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much will they lie in this ad campaing?

    The "Ultra 20 for 29.95 per month" offer they advertized isn't offered. You get charged 360.00 per year not the 29.95/mth they advertize.

    Why should we belive Sun in this case?

  34. Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 5, Informative

    What price sheet have you been looking at and from what year?

    A Sun Fire X2100 starts at $745 LIST. Go through a reseller and you're guaranteed to get discounts on top of that. These prices that UNHEARD OF for Sun. They have completely slashed their prices down to levels that I never thought I would ever see. I've been working with Sun hardware for 10 years and I've been cursing their outrageous prices for nine of those years as I saw Intel after Intel replace numerous Sun workstations and servers. I've had no excuse to curse Sun's prices in the past 12 months.

    If we were talking about the Sun of the past, you'd be absolutely correct. They charged outrageous prices because your were buying the Sun name and the Sun R&D. That arrogance died very recently. Look at any of their x86 offerings, like the Ultra 20, which is also available for less than $900 list.

    Half the quality? They offer a 3 year warranty on all hardware. Every other vendor I've had to deal with wants a service contract ($$$) for that amount of coverage. I doubt they'd give that warranty if they thought the quality was such that the systems wouldn't last at least that long. Otherwise, they'd expect to lose a shitload of money to spare parts and customer service calls, which would not be a wise move at all.

    Oh, by the way ... all of Sun's x86 servers are certified to run Linux. They wouldn't bother if they thought that Linux sucks.

    It's blatantly obvious that you don't have a clue what you're talking about or you just want to bash on Sun for the sake of bashing on Sun.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  35. Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to by mtrisk · · Score: 5, Funny

    That porno-mag style interview with the SunFire server near the fire place is very interesting - more proof that porn and technology go hand in hand. What kind of website would reliable, beefy server hardware be more suited to than a pr0n operation?

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
    1. Re:Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 4, Funny
      more proof that porn and technology go hand in hand.

      Well, not necessarily hand in hand.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    2. Re:Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

      I'll bet the ad would be mildly amusing for a 14 year old boy, but it really is unoriginal. I've seen that marketing angle taken many, many times (and it's usually w/ technology too).

      Tired.

    3. Re:Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I'll bet the ad would be mildly amusing for a 14 year old boy

      Or for those who never matured past the age of 14. When you think about it, the ads might be perfect for the target market.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  36. I, for one... by Dogmatron · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new bitchin' Sun X86 overlords. I'd like to remind them as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground ass-whoopin' caves.

  37. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by buysse · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Sun Opteron boxes are also Microsoft certified for Windows 2003. That had to make McNealy chafe.

    --
    -30-
  38. That's real smart by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    It does nothing for the consumer (because you'd assume Dell employees would have Dell servers)...and even if a consumer caught a glimpse of it, all I saw at first was a huge black and bold "DELL".

    1. Re:That's real smart by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      It's not a marketing move targetted at consumers directly.

      It's indirectly targeted at us.

      Sun doesn't want people to see the flyover so much as post pics of the flyover on Slashdot. Think about it. This is the first Sun related thread in sometime where Linux is rarely mentioned.

      Sun hopes that some of us making buying decisions on server hardware and software at our businesses, and that this will but Sun back in our heads

  39. I have a few ideas... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dell, the name Osama Bin Laden swears by.

    When you buy Dell, it makes the baby Jesus cry. You don't want to make the baby Jesus cry, do you?

    Hey Dell, we just fucked your girlfriend.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I have a few ideas... by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      Meh. I've used all of those on my friends.

      I want to see some yo mama jokes.

    2. Re:I have a few ideas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Dell is jewish. Most likely it would be the name Osama Bin Laden swears AT.

    3. Re:I have a few ideas... by anagama · · Score: 1

      I can't remember any "yo momma" jokes, but it did bring to mind the "mommy mommy" jokes of many years ago (e.g., mommy mommy, I don't like this spagetti. Shuddup or I'll rip the veins out of your other arm.)

      So ... mommy mommy I don't how this dell keyboard feels. Shuddup or I'll shove the mouse up your ass too.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:I have a few ideas... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Dell caused Katrina.

    5. Re:I have a few ideas... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hey Dell, we just fucked your girlfriend."

      Considering Dell is Microsoft's and Intel's crack whore, I hope Sun wore protection.

    6. Re:I have a few ideas... by flatface · · Score: 1
      I hope Sun wore protection.

      Chapter 11?

    7. Re:I have a few ideas... by jpostel · · Score: 1

      On the Middle East front, Dell was actually the server platform of choice for Saddam. A US Marine I worked with recently was baby sitting the boxes for a year after the US military took over Baghdad. He said the data center he was in had about 1000 servers. They were not little 1U either.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    8. Re:I have a few ideas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Dell, the name Osama Bin Laden swears by.

      Well, it worked in the last election...

    9. Re:I have a few ideas... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Also, Scott McNealy could star in a few ads.

      He could be on a stage, covered in sweat and jumping up and down. His lines would be,

      "DELL!! DELL!! DELL!! DELL!! DELL!! WHOOOOOOOOO!!!! I HAAAATE THAT COMPANY!!!! WHOOOOOOOO!!!!"

      Then he can pick up his own feces and start throwing them at a cardboard cutout of Michael Dell.

      Or he could give a keynote speech at a convention, and as he's about to leave, turn around, and say, "Oh, one other thing. Dell sucks." and then leave the stunned audience, who are still trying to grasp what he said.

  40. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? Exactly by sien · · Score: 1
    Surely it's an indication of the fact that Sun has lost it's engineering focus and is now being driven by marketing people.

    Certainly, firms can survive and even thrive like that, but for Sun it is surely bad news.

  41. Dell's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want Dell's market, they have to acknowledge Dell. If Sun just puts out an x86-64 server and says "Here it is", most departmental admins won't pay attention to it. The name Sun scream high end server to those people. By going after Dell in their ads, these departmental admins will see it as an ad targeted to them. They might see it as Sun making a server for their needs.

  42. So Long Sun by xactuary · · Score: 1
    Thanks for playing.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
    1. Re:So Long Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time someone takes it up to the boys of Michael. I am getting sick of their crappy products.

      Go Sun!

  43. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I spec and purchase all my servers. well, me or the other sysadmin do.

    Wouldn't work at a place where the PHB made technology purchasing decisions.


    Fortunately for you, you are lucky for now, but unfortunately, it does not seem to be the norm.

  44. Re:Rhymes with... by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1

    "Windows Server 2003...not"?

  45. haha, those were hilarious by MattW · · Score: 1

    Those were *hilarious*, though.

    "What's the matter with you people?! Haven't you ever seen a bandicoot before?"

  46. I guess it pays to RTFA by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Ooops. Thought they were dual-single cores.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  47. Works for me by astrashe · · Score: 1

    I always buy my computer equpipment based on flyovers. Whoever does the best job of buzzing the other guy gets my business.

    This the way that I figure it. Everyone knows that kids are good at computers. And everyone knows that geeks lack social skills. Heck, I'm a geek and I lack them.

    So it follows that a company that comes off like a bunch of adolescent jerks would have really good stuff.

    All sarcasm aside, I haven't had a sun server in a long time, but my old sparc 5 boxes were really great. Extremely solid and reliable. Their new stuff probably is pretty good.

    But all this ad campaign does is make me hope that the free java stack comes sooner rather than later. If it's open, no one can break it, and these guys aren't inspiring confidence.

    Finally, whenever I see something like this, I always think of Thomas Frank's book "The Conquest of Cool." It's about how corporations use counter culture and rebellion to sell themselves, and the cultural significance of their eagerness to do so. It's a good read.

    Maybe if sun had a really kick ass spokesrebel -- like scammer and z-dog. Or maybe if the ads were 10% more proactive. That would be awesomely outrageous.

    I mean, the guys running sun are just like me -- they're getting bitchslapped by the man, and so am I. Only they have their own jets.

  48. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1
    I spec and purchase all my servers. well, me or the other sysadmin do.

    Wouldn't work at a place where the PHB made technology purchasing decisions.

    Then you would not be influenced by any ad, it is then not targetted at you but at PHBs who do make decisions.

    There's a part of their market that they have to get with technical merit and a part that they have to get with publicity.

    --
    Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
  49. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I spec and purchase all my servers. well, me or the other sysadmin do. Wouldn't work at a place where the PHB made technology purchasing decisions.

    Good for you. But really, so fucking what?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  50. photoshopped by sloop · · Score: 1

    The pic is photoshopped (the 'look out dell' part).. or gimped

    1. Re:photoshopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, I looked really close and it looked to me like they drew it up by hand on engineering paper with a pencil.
      Thank god you're here to point it out that they used some type of graphics software for making these graphics.

    2. Re:photoshopped by FLaSh+SWT · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope. I live right next to Dell's Round Rock campus and this (http://www.justanotherpodcast.net/Files/Sunx86Fly oversmall.jpg) is exactly what was flying over around 2 PM.

  51. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by bircho · · Score: 1
  52. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why? I think that's a really brilliant move! That means that Sun systems are the only systems out there that are certified to run Linux, Windows, and Solaris x86. That's has the potential to be an awesome marketing tool that no other server manufacturer can make.

    As I mentioned in a different Slashdot story, one of the local Windows admins got a loaner Sun system with Windows installed on it and he was very impressed with its speed and stability. That can open a whole, new market base for Sun. And even if those servers don't run Solaris now, who's to say that they won't in the future as current systems are put into end-of-life or replaced and therefore can serve other functions? Now that we've moved the data to a bigger server, what should we do with this one? Let's put that Solaris on it and see what we can do with it. Hey, it's a very distinct possibility.

    Personally, I think that it's about time that McNealy swallowed a bit of that arrogant pride of his. It's been a long time coming. As a Sun admin for over 10 years I'm very excited about this new direction that Sun has been taking. Let's hope it's not too little, too late.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  53. Sun's "Inside Jack" ads are much better by Zemplar · · Score: 1

    See Inside Jack now.

    You have to like Jack's T-shirt - "No, I will not fix your computer"!

    Where can I get one of those?

    1. Re:Sun's "Inside Jack" ads are much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can I get one of those?

      Right here.

    2. Re:Sun's "Inside Jack" ads are much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inside Jack looks like some AC/DC devil worshipping freak. ( Notice his hand sign is the devil sign ). Personally I spit on the Devil and I don't care for anything that attracts evil. The BSD Demon comes from UCB and is ok ( School mascot ) but Inside Jack is not ok. There is a fine line.

    3. Re:Sun's "Inside Jack" ads are much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UCB's mascot is a bear. The BSD "demon" is actually a "Daemon" which BSD and all other *nixes have a ton of.

    4. Re:Sun's "Inside Jack" ads are much better by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      As that other guy said, thinkgeek is the place to go. I actually saw some chick wearing one around the computer science building at my university sometime last week.

      And yes, it is definitely a cool shirt. I rather like Sun's sense of humour... unlike what other people are saying, I think that all these ads really just show that Sun has finally figured out that much their target audience (ie. Slashdot-reading sysadmins) are easily amused and often lack the maturity level of their more businesslike colleagues.

  54. Mirrors Mirrors mirrors! by xbmodder · · Score: 1

    http://xbmodder.us/sun/approved.html http://xbmodder.us/sun/pdf A mirror of all the PDFs.

    1. Re:Mirrors Mirrors mirrors! by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Dude - if any company needs a mirror against the slashdot effect, it aint Sun. Still .. it would be nice to try tho.

    2. Re:Mirrors Mirrors mirrors! by xbmodder · · Score: 1

      It was not against the slashdot effect. It was againt the bad pr effect.

  55. Punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Shouldn't that be "WATCH OUT, DELL"?

    I am forced to conclude these marketing shops hire chimps as editors.

  56. Attitude ! by filekutter · · Score: 1

    I love that feeling I get when a company gets some righteous 'tude... just gives me goosebumps. Screw being nice, be RUDE !!!! Plus, in the rule of advertising its perfect, no matter how you do it be remembered !

    --
    I call computer-illiteracy job security
    1. Re:Attitude ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, memorable. I'll remember not to buy Sun. The whole thing has too much of the stink of junior high to me.

  57. Sun against Dell by coolsva · · Score: 1

    Reinds me of the story of an aged heavyweight boxer hurling insults at the new kid in town rather than retiring gracefully. Has all the 'dot in dot-com' peer of microsoft and the top tier, now dealing with the likes of Dell (commodity vendors). Whats next, Sun v/s WalMart brand PCs or would it be Sun v/s some small time software vendor

    1. Re:Sun against Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Sun is competing quite well. They have the engineers to pull off these systems, while Dell is mostly just a business model. Now, Sun has that business model, too.

  58. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1, Troll

    What are you talking about?

    The GGP implied that it's not really the sysadmins that can purchase the servers anyway, not the sysadmins. The GP replied "Hey, I'm a sysadmin, and I can!".

    So fucking what?

    So he, and I, can fucking purchase fucking sun fucking equipment is fucking what. What's _YOUR_ fucking point?

  59. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? Exactly by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If marketing didn't matter, then DEC would probably still be around as DEC. They were very good with engineering, but bad at marketing and mad at management too.

  60. Re:Unfortunately... by friek · · Score: 0

    IBM sells servers cheaper, sure.. but they sell everything in bundles, especially to large clients which is basically the server market.

    I've recently entered the hell known as the DB2/WebFear/AIX bundle. I was forced into it in a shared environment in a fairly large corporation.

    My other internal customers all use WL, whatever DB they choose (mainly Oracle and MySQL), and a mix of Solaris and Linux.

    The side that has a choice loves the new servers. The side that is all IBM in comparison is, for lack of a better word, pathetic.

    Of course, they both gripe about the choice of M$ OSes as being a filthy scheme to make more money!

  61. Clarification... by jpellino · · Score: 3, Informative

    that $745 is sans drive and OS - $1295 for the 80GB SATA & Solaris.

    That's still half the price of the low-end xServe. Hmmm....

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Clarification... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Heh. Yeah. And something like 8 times the performance.
      And much more security, stability, compatibility and support.

      But you're still not going to get a hardware vendor that acknowledges their engineering mishaps.

    2. Re:Clarification... by rsax · · Score: 1
      And much more security, stability, compatibility and support.

      Huh? Much more security?? The Marketing dept. is on the second floor. Thanks for dropping by.

    3. Re:Clarification... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      I challenge you to contest this:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/19/apple_patc hes/

      Did you see all the patches at the end of August? How about last week?
      Man, I bet 3 patches got automatically applied to my dozens of woody boxes in the past two months, and maybe 6-8 to my RHEL 2.1/3.0 boxes.
      Yes, more secure. Much, Much, Much more secure. I don't have to worry about vendors deciding to release patches when they are ready.

    4. Re:Clarification... by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      You buy a rack of these things, who says the storage has to be *in* each server? Sun also sell SAN storage and HA NFS and iSCSI solutions (note these boxes come with plenty of GigE ports built-in).

      They do come with an OS btw - Solaris 10, free.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  62. A new Sun will come out tomorrow... by aapold · · Score: 1

    Bet your bottom dollar That tomorrow... there'll be sun... Just thinking about tomorrow.. Clears away the cobwebs and the sorrow 'Til there's none. When I'm stuck with a dell that's gray and slovenly... I just stick out my chin and grin and say: Oh, the new sun'll come out to-mor-row So you got to hang on till tomorrow come what may Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love ya tomorrow You're always a day away. The sun'll come out to-mor-row bet your bottom dollar that tomorrow... there'll be sun!

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  63. You might think it's stupid, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's getting them loads of press and that is exactly what it was designed to do.

  64. Service Processor by Paska · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have anymore information on this specific Sun x4100 (And I assume other models) feature?

    Features include full remote KVM functionality with video and media redirection. System administrators can access the service processor via the dedicated management Ethernet port.

    I'll tell you what, for $150 (Service processor), and for the total price of these servers. I'm very tempted to grab a few of these and try them out - if Sun can get the message out, these prices are unbelievable from Sun, I think they've just won me back as a customer - if this $150 service processor is remote KVM compatible, hell yeah! Sun here we come.

    1. Re:Service Processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the cheapest Dell 1U's have full-on IPMI cards *standard*. Something proprietary from Sun is probably sweet but they are still just playing catch-up.

    2. Re:Service Processor by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      These are similiar to what sun has always had - LOM/ALOM (Lights out mangement or Advanced LOM).
      Bascically it's a separate unit that is inside the server that runs it's own os (In this case it's linux) that has it's own IP. It lets you do things like poweroff, poweron and reset the host box.
      You can also do something like "attach terminal" and if you have solaris/linux it will give you a tty (as long as you enabled serial redirection in linux) login to the box so you can see your kernel panic or install your patches in single usermode or whatever...

      Quite neat, I've always been a big fan of these. They are standard with suns, add on for IBM and not possible for most other vendors.

    3. Re:Service Processor by Wiz · · Score: 1

      HP have had "integrated lightsout" for years which does exactly that. I've got P3 based boxes I can do just about anything to remotely.

      This isn't really anything special. Although it is a very nice solution, so I'm glad as many servers as possible have it as it does make your life much easier!

  65. Hey wasn't that one of the 9/11 pilots ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Japanese airlines your pilot Mr. Kamokazi will be serving. Bonzai ! Dellson !

  66. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by sn0wflake · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sun is a really cool brand to have on your computer and it's great to have a three year warranty. The problem though is that it's cheaper just buying a dual system per year for the price of a single Sun system.

  67. stupidism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Your post stinks of stupidism.

    No entry found for stupidism.

    Did you mean stupid ism?
    Suggestions:
    stupid ism
    stupid-ism
    Stundism
    stupidest
    stylitism
    stapedius
    stipites
    statism
    stapedes
    stapedes'

    1. Re:stupidism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding ism to the end of an adjective is a regular and well-understood construction for the creation of abstract nouns. An inflexible or static language is an impoverished or dead one.

    2. Re:stupidism? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Maybe you've never heard of this word we have in English - "stupidity".

    3. Re:stupidism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you've never heard of this word we have in English -- "humor."

  68. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? Exactly by CynicalGuy · · Score: 1

    Surely it's an indication of the fact that Sun has lost it's engineering focus and is now being driven by marketing people.

    I dunno, being driven by marketing has worked out pretty well for Dell.

  69. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    unless that system which dies in a year goes down with unbacked up data on it or at a very inconvenient time costing millions of dollars, i'd hate to be the guy on record suggesting we try to save a few grand and costing the company a $50 million contract or worse

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  70. Re:George Bush heads Dell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even me?

  71. Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option by csirac · · Score: 1

    I'm pricing 2U & 3U rack-mount servers to run Linux.

    My desired system is a dual 27x Opteron with 4-6 hot-swap SATA drive bays. What's with all the SCSI out there? There doesn't seem to be any brand-name dual-CPU rack servers out there which have a SATA option.

    Yes, I know SCSI is much faster, has a fraction of the CPU overhead that PATA has, and has been hot-swap capable since probably before I learnt how to read.

    Perhaps I'm trying to stretch my budget too thin, but the best I can do is build my own from components using 3Ware SATA RAID.

    In my limited experience with SCSI, I've actually seen two occasions where having all the disks on the one channel was a bad idea. In both cases, a faild disk managed to lock the entire bus so that none of the good disks could be accessed - rendering the live running failure tolerance of RAID useless.

    So, the idea of cheap SATA drives with their independant connections to the RAID adpater appeals to me.... but this doesn't seem to be an option on any of the brand-names :(

    1. Re:Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option by megabyte405 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Without much poking on the Sun web site, I found that the new x2100, an x64 machine like these, use SATA...

      --
      I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
    2. Re:Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCSI drives still have much lower failure rates than desktop-oriented SATA drives. This actually makes it cheaper for the brandname vendors who service & support their own equipment.

    3. Re:Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really anymore.
      I challenge you to find a good SATA drive vs. a good SCSI drive that can't compete on mtbf (once you've figured in data density per platter).

    4. Re:Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option by csirac · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of this model, however it is only single-CPU and has only two hot-swap drive bays. It's "2-way" in the sense that you can put a single dual-core AMD 27x CPU in it...

      What I would really like, is the v20z with SATA instead of SCSI. Then I'd be a bit happier, except the system I'm looking at building myself is a 3U rack with 8x hot-swap SATA bays.

      It seems they don't like the idea of having your app server also hosting mass storage.

      It seems they would rather you bought separate FC SAN storage for your data storage (the FC "storage solutions" they promote use SATA) and kept your servers running on SCSI in a different box. Which would make sense in an idea world, but it doubles my startup cost..

    5. Re:Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option by bradleycarpenter · · Score: 1

      The Sun X2100 has SATA. The x4100 and x4200 have SAS which is the server version of SATA. If you want a cheap server then build your own. Personally I wouldn't but a SATA harddrive in my server...but that is just me. If you want to be cheap don't complain when things start breaking.

    6. Re:Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option by csirac · · Score: 1

      As I already posted, the X2100 is single-CPU.

      What I would really like to see is a v20z with a SATA instead of SCSI option. These are supposed to be cheap servers, and if SATA drives are good enough for their FC SAN storage products, why aren't they good enough for servers?

      SAS might as well be SCSI in my situation... it's still not cheap, plentiful SATA.

      I don't remember complaining about cheap stuff breaking, either: I understand the benefits of "real" hardware but cannot afford it. As such, what I'm putting together avoids relying on any one server.

      But if you ask me, cheap reliable storage with commodity HDDz is a solved problem. My setups so far have used RAID-1 with 1 or 2 hot spares - I haven't bothered with RAID-5 yet.

      I'm only dealing with about 6-8U worth of stuff in each rack at each site, not exactly datacentre proportions... as long as each RAID array can handle a failed disk for at least 1-2 weeks I'm good.

  72. Rejected ads? by secolactico · · Score: 1

    Benchmark studies prove that Dell sucks

    Shit, I'm sold.

    But seriously, I love Sun hardware. That thing takes a beating and keeps on ticking. The old e220r and e240r have never given me trouble (*knock on wood*)

    But Dells are really cheap. I was told (candidly) by an IBM vendor that they just can't compete with Dell in the inexpensive server market. And I suppose that neither can Sun.

    I have plenty of Dell servers also, and I've never had a major problem with them. The 24 hours support contract gets you replacement parts really quick. But I keep a couple of hot-spares machines just in case one of them decides to go down in a big way.

    The only complain I have with Dell support is when they try to walk you thru their support script even when you have identified the problem and is rather obvious that a replacement is needed. ("Yes, the hard drive is making grinding noises and smoke is coming out of it... why do you need me to run the diagnostics program?")

    --
    No sig
  73. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't everyone mad at management?

  74. Uh, that's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But given Sun's current situation, maybe they'd be better off if instead of looking into bold new ad concepts, they started looking into bold new computing concepts? You know... products? They don't seem nearly as interested in being groundbreaking and risk-taking with the products as they do with their ads.

    I mean... have you looked at what the new, bold new move they're advertising with these ads? It's... and AMD64 server. Pretty much the same as the stuff they were doing with sparc before, only now it has AMD64s instead of Sparcs. Does this sound like leading or following to you?

  75. ATTENTION! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, they've got YOUR attention, you've read the ads, you've been informed about the performance of their product, and now techies from all over the world are thinking and talking about their servers. Right now. You're one of them. To that degree, their marketing has worked. The question is, next time you need a server, considering you've been reading about these ads, are you going to remember their product? I think so.

  76. Re:Rhymes with... by Jon_E · · Score: 1
  77. The last time Sun pulled a stunt like this by stox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    was when they announced the Ultra's. Once again, Sun made a remarkable turn around, and climbed to heights previously unseen. It was the third time Sun had returned from near death. Maybe this will be the forth. Sun has consistently built some of the best platforms out there, time to shed another skin and do it again.

    Do some research, over time Sun has done more for Open Source than any other company.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:The last time Sun pulled a stunt like this by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 0

      ?mmmmm. Now that's some good old-fashioned homemade country-fried trolling. Mod that puppy up! Doubleplus funny.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    2. Re:The last time Sun pulled a stunt like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sun has had the forth for years, in OpenBoot.

    3. Re:The last time Sun pulled a stunt like this by Megane · · Score: 1
      Sun has had the forth for years, in OpenBoot.

      That wooshing sound you hear is your joke going right over the heads of most of the Slashdot readers.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  78. just saw the sun and opened up my eyes by QunaLop · · Score: 0

    i needed some low-end servers for testing/development on windows 2003 in our satallite locations. i was going to grab some dells, but the fire 2100's with a memory upgrade were a much better deal i think. so i just ordered 3 :)

  79. x64 by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 5, Informative
    x64 is Microsoft's vendor neutral name for x86-64/AMD64/IA32e/EM64T. Linux calls it x86-64, but since AMD officially deprecated that name, Sun goes by the Microsoft convention and says x64.

    Sun would probably say AMD64, since that is what they sell, except that they also want you to run Solaris on your non-Sun boxes, which may have 64 bit Intel x86 processors. They may also want to avoid burning bridges, in case Intel processors become more compelling in the future.

    --

    Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
    whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
    --Proverbs 9:7
    1. Re:x64 by HateBreeder · · Score: 1

      Hey, look... a Burning bridge!

      http://www.sun.com/emrkt/rejected/smile_newspaper_ print_LOres.PDF

      (This is actually an approved ad, though they URL may imply otherwise)

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    2. Re:x64 by hritcu · · Score: 1

      They may also want to avoid burning bridges, in case Intel processors become more compelling in the future.

      When they are having Get Off the "Itanic" adds on their site, they *are* burning bridges with Intel, no matter how they call their processor architecture.

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  80. The facts are simple by cpu_fusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sun has a winning hand here. It is that simple.

    The AMD64 platform is a better platform than Intel's at the moment, in every way. And on top of that, Sun has a hell of a lot more experience in building bulletproof hardware. When you factor in Solaris & a lower price tag ... you can see why Sun has no problem mentioning Dell in the ads.

    You can spin this whatever way you want, but I'm looking forward to seeing Sun trash the company that brought us the "Dell dude". Dell can go back to selling their overpriced PCs at Christmas, and the people who actually run the important servers in the world, doing billion dollar transactions, have a clear path to keep the Windows/Dell bozos out of the server room in the basement of the bank.

    1. Re:The facts are simple by varebel · · Score: 1

      You can spin this whatever way you want, but I'm looking forward to seeing Sun trash the company that brought us the "Dell dude".

      Yeah... But, they also brought us the intern chick. She was hot. She can come check out my data center anyday. :)

    2. Re:The facts are simple by C_Kode · · Score: 1

      Umm, show me where Sun has beaten Dell's prices. I hadn't found a single vendor that comes anywhere close to Dell. Price out an HP, Sun, IBM, Penguin Computing, and whom ever else. Then call Dell, tell them you are a small business and tell them price matters. Our last server purchase was 1/3 the price that HP quoted, 1/2 what IBM, and Sun was idiot expensive at five times the price. The server was a PowerEdge 750 2.8ghz P4 with 4GB ram and dual 80GB SATA drives. Price when purchased. $2,089. Most of the other vendors wanted $2k just for the memory.

    3. Re:The facts are simple by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Great, so you've got a box chock full of cheapo components (IDE drives for Gods sake), no enterprise support and no certification that it'll run a decent operating system. If you want disposable servers, then that's up to you, but I prefer to pay a little more for a V20z that outperforms the Poweredge and runs Solaris.

    4. Re:The facts are simple by typical · · Score: 1

      Dell can go back to selling their overpriced PCs at Christmas

      Okay, I have my share of gripes with Dell...but *overpriced*? You'd have to be a pretty ept system builder to beat Dell on price.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    5. Re:The facts are simple by linguae · · Score: 1

      Dell boxen do start out at lower prices, don't get me wrong. Where else can you get a machine for $299 after mail-in rebates? In fact, the markets where Dell sells the most volume are schools and businesses that need a huge amount of computers, and home users who just need something to email letters and type documents. They are the ones buying Dell's $399 specials. It is very tough competing with Dell on those price levels. When was the last time you've seen a brand new Apple or Sun sell for that low of a price?

      Now, when you step into the higher price ranges (like $2000 and more), this is when Dell starts to get beaten by Apple and Sun, as far as hardware quality and performance. The PowerPC G5 and the Sun UltraSPARC are much more elegant processors and better performing than most Pentium 4s and the Xeon. The hardware quality that you'll get from a Mac or from Sun is much better than what you'll get from Dell. And the level or corporate support is much greater from Sun. Finally, you get Solaris on your Sun. With a Dell, you get Windows or Linux.

      If you want a good, cheap box that will get you around, then you can't go wrong with a Dell. I have seen plenty of higher-end Dells that made me drool. However, if you want a quality, well-engineered box with excellent support and an excellent vendor-made Unix-based OS then you should go to Sun.

  81. rtfm Sun by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

    Dell has had 64-bit servers for a long while

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
  82. hahahaha... by Sr.+Pato · · Score: 1

    "Benchmark studies show that Dell sucks"
    Hahaha! Wooo... *Ahem*.
    ...
    *wipes tear off cheek*
    It's a shame those ones didn't fly. Because they're damn humorous, if you ask me.
    I'd love to see Dell's CEO open a magazine to see that ad on a page. Hehehe...
    *wipes more tears and keeps laughing hysterically*

    --
    Nobody's gay for Mole-Man. :-(
  83. Isn't this missing the point? by MrEd · · Score: 1

    They seem to have a bigger problem: The only sales point they're making is that they use less electricity than the competition. Since when has that meant anything to institutional (or home) purchasers?

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:Isn't this missing the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when has that meant anything to institutional ...

      Um, electricity on a server farm can run 100K per month. That's over a million per year. So, a 66% savings is.... more that you'll make in your life time, linux boy. Power consumption has been the primary design consideration driving all the last 3 years of chip work: Intel, Motorolla, AMD, Transmeta (hehe). Why are these guys moving to multi-core technology, and not higher clock speeds? BECAUSE OIL IS $70/BARREL, DIMWIT. When you clock at high speeds, all you do is generate heat and waste power. So, multi-core is the way to get more work done at lower power levels.

      ...(or home) purchasers

      Holy fsck. You are dense. These are 1U and 4U units with rack rails. The target market is the server market , not the home owners. Do you really think this is for the home market? Come to think of it, do you even know who Sun sells to?

    2. Re:Isn't this missing the point? by gotak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cost is still cost no matter where it comes from. And telling the VP that you save them so much a year always gets you brownie points no matter where that savings goes. It doesn't even matter if what you did to save them money actually sucks vs what you did before. As long as they hear a lot of the good and don't noice the bad you are golden.

      At anyrate here are some reason why lower power is becoming more and more important. First all large datacenters costs tons to cool. You are talking huge air conditioning units running 24/7. Everytime you add a rack to your server room you come that much closer to having to spend a large chunk of money upgrading your cooling. You also come that much closer to having to upgrade your power systems. Server rooms aren't usually just plug it into wall kind of deal. You actually get large power conditioning in professional datacenters. The point is you don't just save on the power the servers themselves actually use but also on cooling and the power conditioning. Also the less power a server uses the cooler it runs the more you can pack into a rack without worrying about them over heating. That also saves you money cause it means you can put that many more servers in the space you have before you need a cheque to pay of an expansion or relocation to a large facility.

    3. Re:Isn't this missing the point? by Spectra72 · · Score: 1

      The University of Buffalo could not run their new Dell cluster at full capacity due to power problems. Power is becoming a HUGE issue in the datacenter.

      Your gaming machine at home? Not so much. Hundreds if not thousands of servers in a datacenter (plus all the ethernet and san switches, storage media..etc, etc)...big problems.

    4. Re:Isn't this missing the point? by MrEd · · Score: 1

      Hey, how come you didn't post with your real user account? Hope you feel better. :)

      --

      Wah!

  84. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by urlgrey · · Score: 1

    I have to second the motion here. Sun's pricing of late is jaw-dropping. My *only* complaint--and the primary reason a great deal of the Sun hardware I have in service is still in service (aside from the fact that it's EXTREMELY reliable)--is that Sun patently refuses to supply OpenBSD with the necessary documentation for supporting the newest Sun hardware.

    Grrrr. If I could run OpenBSD on the latest Sun offerings, I'd snap up Sun gear like it was going out of style. (No comments from the peanut gallery on that one, please. ;-)

    In the mean time the little ol' SPARCstations and Netras are chugging along doing their various tasks without a peep.

    --
    Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
  85. With apologies to Nappy D by bighoov · · Score: 5, Funny

    Michael Dell: I'm trying to make computers for kids to take to college.

    Scott McNealy: Your mom goes to college.

  86. I have a theory about "advertising" by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
    ... my theory is: ... Good products don't need much if any advertising. Ever see an ad like:
    • "Try Sex! It's really good!"
    • "Air -- the real refresher!"
    • "Food - Tastes good!"

    The opposite is that crappy products need a LOT of flogging, and indirectly at that. Witness all the "Amazing Discoveries" quasi-show infomercials. And perhaps the Sun ads.

    1. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Of course! They always play those advertisements for those god awful products that can't sell themselves! Like...
      • Apple Ipod - fucking Apple, forcing that shiny 40gb mp3 player down my throat.
      • Satallite Radio - what fucktard thought it would be intelligent to beam radio from space directly to me, particuarly when im watching TV
      • Tivo - I wish I could skip through this Tivo commercial.
      • The original 1984 Mac - what a horrible flop THAT was, clearly the largest waste of an ad campaign eVAR!
      But *incredible* products just fly off the shelf at their own free will, with no advertising what so ever! Like...
      • Segway - I've never seen an ad for a segway! These devices are going to CHANGE THE FUCKING WAY WE BUILD CITIES!!!
      • Rokr - Subpar MP3 and Cell Phone in the same device; that's the wave of the future. All the advertising money spent on Nano? No worries, Rokr will change the future.
      • Daikatana - If youre still reading, I eat people.
      Wait.... a CS nerd, who hasn't changed in three weeks, calls out a 10 billion-dollar-a-month-industry that is Advertising -- on the amazing revelation that "good products sell themselves"? When you aren't furiously masterbating to Inu Yasha and reading slashdot, please go to your MKTG 101 class this week.

      HJ
    2. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by LizardKing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      my theory is: ... Good products don't need much if any advertising.

      That was the attitude over at Digital. Their head honcho believed that they would dominate by just having the best products, and that marketing was therefore a waste of time. Instead they got bought out by some commodity PC outfit called Compaq.

    3. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      it helps your argument if you use points in your FAVOR, not against:
      • Apple has always advertised heavily, because they CAN, they've traditionally had huge margins.
      • Satellite radio is used by approx 1% of US residents. Sirius has to advertise to the tune of $145 to grab each bleepin customer (from their 2005 SEC statement). Not exactly a market whopper, even with those huge adv costs.
      • Tivo stock IPO'd at 30, tanked down to 5 within months, and has been hovering around 5 for the last three years. They tossed out their prez. Not exactly a magic company.
      • Apple stock TANKED right after the Mac intro. I know, I lost many $K speculating it would zoom. Sigh. All the cool expensive ads couldnt make up for having to pay $2,495 for a 128k machine or $495 for a 400K external floppy drive. They could afford the ads because rumor has it Sculley demanded they raise the intro price by $500 JUST TO PAY FOR THE Bleepin ADS!
      Similarly, the converse isnt true. If a company DOESNT advertise much, that doesnt imply they have a great product. Examples do include Segway an Daikatana. The jury's still out on Rokr. Regards, A_H
    4. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a fucking idiot.

    5. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      Digital flopped for technical reasons as well. They took a long time to get a UNIX solution out (some people wanted to not be totally stuck on proprietary VMS). Then when RISC took off and had much improved performance with less transistors, they were still stuck on VAX.

      They tried to use MIPS to compensate the gap, then made Alpha, which came out pretty late (one of the last RISC architectures to come to be). They never recovered their share. They could not afford to pay the manufacturing plant. Plus their machines were too expensive and they had no decent workstation solutions.

      They also missed oportunities in the personal computer market, etc. Ever checked out their IBM compatible PCs? They sucked.

      Which advertising budget did Google have? Yet they succeeded.

    6. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      They took a long time to get a UNIX solution out (some people wanted to not be totally stuck on proprietary VMS). Then when RISC took off and had much improved performance with less transistors, they were still stuck on VAX.

      Most people using Unix in the early to mid 1980s ran it on a VAX - they licensed Unix from AT&T but used the BSD version. Digital brought out their own Unix variant in the 1980s (it was 4.3BSD based and called Ultrix). Ultrix disappeared when the Alpha came out with their version of OSF/1, which was eventually called Tru64. Any late adoption of Unix was not what sunk Digital.

      Whether the Alpha was a latecomer to the RISC party is debatable as the PowerPC came later and is still rather successful. Performance wise, the Alpha was definitely the best of the era. However, DEC failed to push it as a viable mid-range server architecture, concentrating on the high end for too long.

      As for Digitals PC line, I don't recall them being any better or worse than Compaq, which were considered top notch in the mid-nineties. In fact I particularily liked Digital laptops. They did try to push VaxStations as a viable alternative to the PC, whereas they were hardly an alternative to Unix workstations (down to whether you liked VMS I suppose).

    7. Re:I have a theory about "advertising" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because stock prices dictate whether or not something is a good product. Didn't AMD's stock tank lately even though Intel's has been steadily on the rise?

  87. Re:George Bush heads Dell? by lloydtesterman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    uhh, actually I have a full tank in both of my SUVs, my car AND my truck. So, I am not gas thirsty at all, I have plenty!! Thanks for caring though....

  88. What's with all the cussing? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

    Watch the language for heaven's sake, there might be some kids reading.

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    1. Re:What's with all the cussing? by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

      Kids reading? Not in America.. leave no twit behind!

    2. Re:What's with all the cussing? by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ, this is like some fucking swear convention.

    3. Re:What's with all the cussing? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Fuck 'em.

  89. Copy Infringment by Mastadex · · Score: 0

    I gotta sue sun...

    Ive been saying 'Dell Sucks' way before it was cool!

    --
    A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
  90. Re:Will they lie in this one too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    29.95 * 12 = 359.40

    Are you really complaining about 60 cents?

    Give me a break.

  91. MOD PARENT UP! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Where are my modpoints when I need 'em! ;-)

    Paul B.

  92. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look around. Most Server Admins wouldn't know jack or shit if both landed on their nose and started singing the Macarena. You know the old saw about how half of all people are below average, well, that applies to Server Admins too.

    Research? HAHA! What Server Admin has time for research? They are just trying to find out how they can be left alone to surf Slashdot and IM their dorkie Server Admin friends all day.

  93. Apples vs. Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sun.com/emrkt/rejected/rhymes_magazine_ page_LEres.PDF

    What possible value do I get from a comparison between 1U and 4U machines? I don't buy 4U machines just to crunch numbers... there's room to expand... more slots, more bays...

    I'm confused.

  94. Hey, I can't do much worse than Sun... by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    Why not borrow from Raid bug spray?
    "Kills Dell Dead."

    and here's some others:
    "Dell. Makes a better fertiliser"
    "Sun spanks the competition"
    "Sun powns noobs"

    1. Re:Hey, I can't do much worse than Sun... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Sun Fire - it really whips the llama's ass.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  95. And around Berkeley by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

    They've been flying around here too... Meh... Not sure who they're aiming to impress...

    --
    Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
  96. English, dead language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sun is making some noise over their latest x64server entries by doing a fly by over Dell's HQ yesterday."

    If it's yesterday, they're not "doing a fly by". They DID a fly by.

    Geeze.

  97. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an SA I can fully confirm X86 Suns do infact suck, they stick sucky -always failing- drives in the machines, replace the failed drives with more sucky failing drives.

    While Dell's stuff is far from perfect, they are more reliable from the sense I don't have the need to call them every week to get new drives, because the drives they ship aren't fsck'd and don't need to be.

  98. Re:Rhymes with... by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    and ever think you'd see this?
    http://www.sun.com/service/support/windows/

    That wasn't half the surprise that seeing this was.
  99. Re:bold new Sun ad slogans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2001 called, they want their angst back.

  100. Power efficiency is the point by JoeBuck · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Servers aren't for home purchasers (except maybe for us geeks). Power is critical to any institution that wants to put a lot of servers in the same room; power consumption is the critical limitation for how much CPU power you can get in one room. The limit is not how much current you can get into the room, but whether you can have enough AC to keep everything from frying. A server farm with several hundred dual-core processors puts out a lot of heat.

    The competition has given Sun an opening, by sticking with Intel even in an area where AMD has better technology (though Intel will probably catch up in a year or two). Ordinarily I'd laugh at Sun for saying "we're number 6". But if they can partner with AMD well, and AMD can deliver in volume, Sun may survive, they might even do well.

    But the people I know are only going to be interested in buying those boxes if they run Linux. To be specific, Red Hat Enterprise, since that's pretty much the standard for electronic design automation these days at least in the US. That's why Sun is suddenly making nice to Red Hat.

    1. Re:Power efficiency is the point by MrEd · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks, I was pretty stuck in the home mentality on that one. I am a little bit wiser now, cheers,

      -A

      --

      Wah!

  101. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

    As someone who currently works in IT sales, I have this to say: It varies based on the size of the company and what industry the company is in, but most of the time, the people who do the maintenance also make the purchasing decisions.

    Also, I think the ads are targeted more towards the younger server administrators.

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
  102. "Ass-Whooping"? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    'At Sun, we're the radical engineers that build "ass-whoopin" technology - we're not Miss Manners and we never want to be.'

    Is that where your butt lets out a strange noise?

    Last I read, the phrase should be "ass-whuppin'".

    Well, I guess geeks aren't familiar with the concept...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  103. Who cares, the company is tanking by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    If they weren't laying people off like crazy and losing money quarter after quarter I might find it funny.

    Basically Sun squandered its oppirtunity with Linux when they destroyed Cobalt and then pissed away any chance of future improvement by not doing anything during the tech bust but waiting.

    Aren't most of Sun's senior manangement old Dec or Data General people anyway?

    1. Re:Who cares, the company is tanking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cobalt -- still around, just look harder

      Sun -- their bleeding red ink has begun to clot and heal

      Wall Street -- starting to show some optimism for Sun (positive analyst reports, up stock on Monday).

  104. Informix vs Oracle by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember Informix vs Oracle fights.
    http://www.oreview.com/9705edit.htm
    http://www.businessweek.net/bwdaily/dnflash/march/ new0326b.htm

    Oracle then went ahead & used all their muscle to crush Informix.

    1. Re:Informix vs Oracle by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      To be fair though, informix sucks.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  105. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, even though a lot of people recently have taken a liking to it, "sic" doesn't mean "I don't know how to spell this"...

  106. wtf? by geniusj · · Score: 1

    A Dell PE6850 (Quad-CPU capable box, also capable of holding quite a bit of storage) versus a 1U sun server? At least compare something similar. They look like nice servers, but this advertising is a bit deceiving. I suppose it's because the Sun can have 2xDual core opterons. I guess Dell needs to jump on the dual core bandwagon.

    1. Re:wtf? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dell is crippled by sticking with Intel. Intel went for the laptop market, while AMD went for the server market. The laptop market is bigger, and the margins are better in the server market, so this was a good choice for both companies. The problem is that Dell is trying to sell servers with CPUs that really aren't intended for server-class applications, or with older server class chips, while Sun is selling servers containing chips designed for servers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  107. About time screw Dell! by phocutus · · Score: 0

    I've been building x86 and Opteron Solaris machines for ages. I've also done it for Linux & FreeBSD. However, EVERY Dell Server I've EVER used has sucked a huge donkey-dick! I fucking loath those POSes! It's nice to see Sun hitting the x64 market harder with these new boxes. I've played with a few and they're NICE! My only bitch is SCSI, but easily modified. Dell can rott in hell

  108. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by Megane · · Score: 0
    That means that Sun systems are the only systems out there that are certified to run Linux, Windows, and Solaris x86.

    Because the thing you really want to do with a server is double- or triple-boot it. Yeah. Ph33r my sub 1-day uptimes.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  109. NO SUNW FLY ZONE IN SUNNYVALE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 10:45AM on 9/12, one of the ad planes flew around the NT & YHOO buildings in Sunnyvale, CA. It's strange because there's not a lot of biz still around Java drive. Save money on the gas and X64 banners for the lawyers that they'll need in the future. I'm glad that I'm not a shareholder in SUNW. More money should be spent on compatibility issues and making the "write once, run everywhere" slogan work for its customers.

  110. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by Mandrel · · Score: 1
    Because the thing you really want to do with a server is double- or triple-boot it. Yeah. Ph33r my sub 1-day uptimes.

    Opterons will soon have on-chip support for virtualization, allowing all three OSs to run simultaneously -- a great advantage for applications like web/application/database servers.

  111. Weak by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
    If Sun is going to play catch up, they better go back to Marketing 101. Who are they marketing to anyway? They're seriously way too far behind to think they can attack the entire market with their smaller resource pool.

    It's time they get their feet back into niche markets and market it accordingly. They're gonna bite off WAY more than they can chew.

    --
    Berto
  112. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

    "will soon have" and vapor should be synonyms... Until it's out, it doesn't count.

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  113. Sun tries x86, take 2 by Animats · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the Sun 386i? Intel 386 based. Ran SunOS 4. Not successful - worked OK, but not price competitive with PCs and not compatible with Sun's other product lines.

    1. Re:Sun tries x86, take 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were the other product lines you refer to? I can't remember back that far (what has it been, 15-20 years?). I think the current hardware is cheaper that the competition and doesn't run SunOS 4, so I hope Sun has learned its lessons about using 386 chips.

  114. As a person managing a datacenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just ordered two hundred of them at 680 bucks each (with hard drive). They're twice as powerful, use less power, and are $40 cheaper than the servers I was getting from Dell.

    Oh and yes, we get most of our business from serving porn, and that's what these machines will be doing :)

  115. PowerComputing Mac Clone Ads by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    First thing I thought of after reading the headline were these ads PowerComputing ran during their peak in the industry.

    (R.I.P. PowerTower Pro series.)

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  116. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it means you can buy the same hardware for your entire enterprise, and worry about what to put on it later.

  117. DELL SUCKS MORE JUICE THAN YOUR MOM by dthx1138 · · Score: 1

    (BUT PERFORMANCE IS LACKING)

    probably not going to make it, eh...

    --
    I just found the box to change my sig. Um.... [timeless witticism].
  118. One word to describe it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SEGA !!

  119. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by humina · · Score: 1

    When someone swears in an argument it usually means that the other person has such a good point that the arguer cannot construct a valid and decent point. They must instead fall back on variations of 4 letter words. I find it funny that the grandparent swore first, but the parent, determined to lose the argument more, followed that one up with more swearing. Brilliant.

    --
    check out the best blog ever:
    http://oehlberg.com
  120. SUN is back. by Dangero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to work at SUN and I was personally at the meetings when they were announcing and planning their takeover of the x86 server market. They have been strategically planning and designing for this for more than two years now. The thing that SUN was finding as they made their designs and tested them is that they were finding flaws in the Intel/AMD ref designs, and when they went and told them, those companies were saying, "Wow, nobody ever noticed that before." SUN knows how to make a stable server, and their designs are WORLD CLASS. Bottom line. Looks like SUN is poised to become a great name in computing again.

  121. More images ... by hritcu · · Score: 1
    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  122. Re:One more :) by hritcu · · Score: 1
    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  123. Humourism by OBx2 · · Score: 0

    Americans have "humor", us regular English folk have "humour".

    --
    Das computermachinen ist nicht fur der fingerpoken und mittengraben. Keep das hans in poketz und vatch das blinken leitz
    1. Re:Humourism by JLF65 · · Score: 1

      No you don't. If you check, all those words that we spell with "or" instead of "our" are all French. Humor, honor, color... all old French, and of latin root.

  124. Special offer from Sun by hritcu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.sun.com/emrkt/x64tradeup/index.html

    Trade in any qualified Dell server and get a 20% trade-up allowance off the list price on eligible new Sun Fire X4100 and X4200 servers with 3-year support services. That's a potential savings of up to $1,900 on new entry level Sun servers that have 1.5 times the performance of Xeon-based Dell servers.* Sun Fire X4100 and X4200 servers also offer up to 56% savings in power and cooling costs per year over comparable Dell servers.

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    1. Re:Special offer from Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, that one slipped past my ad blocker.

  125. wait for few more years by Phoe6 · · Score: 1

    wait for few more years to see Mr.Scott weaing a Dell badge.
    Doesn't it sound familar?

    --
    Senthil
  126. IN the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the past having worked for large unix houses powered exclusivly with sun and Digital then compaq gear. We had problems with all of the different vendors hardware from time to time. However in all cases the Unix based Sun hardware was ALWAYS more reliable than the Dell based Intel Windows hardware. Later I moved to a Linux based x86 company that exclusivly uses dell. Nothing but problems with RAID cards, scsi issues all sorts of problems. The moral of the story is if anyone ever asks me what hardware to buy I always say anything BUT dell.

  127. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

    Er, aren't the Sun drivers for Linux open-source? Can't the OpenBSD folk just port them?

    --S

    --
    -- sigs cause cancer.
  128. Sun's Bad Taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "bold ad concept" reveals Sun's bad taste.

  129. Ummm... so? by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

    So there's yet another more-or-less-standard computer to be sold. Oh, wait. It's just being sold at a different price.

    And there's an ad campaign for it.

    People, I don't give a flying rats sh*t about advertisements.
    Have a look at any newspaper. It's full of that crap. I thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster for AdBlock for my browser. I don't have a TV, simply because of ads. I don't listen to the radio for the same reason. Last time I went to the movies, I saw 40 (!) minutes of ads - haven't been in a cinema since.

    I hate adverts. Loathe them.
    So here's one which is not quite as terminally moronic as most of them (and I did like the idea of the plane).
    But is it NEWS?

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  130. zzzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sun still around ? Thought they were long gone.

  131. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say I'm running RHEL4.

    Why would I want to switch to Solaris 10?

    Really?

  132. The "Sun" is setting... by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0

    ...and this marketing joke justs proves.

    --
    Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
  133. The Ads the Wall Street Journal Rejected by windowpain · · Score: 1

    The only thing "controversial" about the Sun ads the WSJ refused to run is that they're vulgar and juvenile.

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
  134. Censored? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst censorship ever. oops sorry dell, those weren't supposed to be seen by everyone on slashdot.

  135. trying to avoid dell by nostriluu · · Score: 1


    I've been trying to avoid buying a Dell server for three months now. Thing is, I can't even build a cheap 1U x86 box for what Dell sells theirs for, and the Dell price includes their 3 year, 24x7 4 hour onsite service.

    In Canada at least, HP's Opteron line is almost competitive, until you factor in extended support, which is incredibly expensive. So here's hoping Sun will provide a decent, low cost Opteron based server with extended support costs competitive with Dell.

    PS. Dell outsources their support. I'm told by one of their techs their prices are so low because they they use older components, but they were pretty quick with dual core systems.

  136. strange URL by smartdreamer · · Score: 1

    What should we think of this page (URL)? http://www.sun.com/emrkt/rejected/approved.html
    I'm sure they never read this. That is not really good naming. Anyway...

  137. I heard that... by doctorjay · · Score: 0

    Dell just set up 8 new SAM sites along their perimeter.

  138. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Oh, by the way ... all of Sun's x86 servers are certified to run Linux. They wouldn't bother if they thought that Linux sucks.


    Au contraire. The reason they advertise Linux compatibility with their servers is precisely the same reason they advertise Windows compatibility: it's what their customers want to run. If they could, I'm sure they'd wave a magic wand and make their clients all hot and bothered to run Solaris.

    Most likely the reason you don't hear them outright trashing Linux these days is that someone who works marketing for their hardware finally got through to the upper management: "Your customers are running Linux. They like Linux. Trash talk Linux, and they get defensive about their choices. Then they don't like you no more."
  139. Go to Sun's site and click on "buy one" by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    The site will churn for a bit and ultimately do nothing. That happens for any of the new Sunfire AMD_64 servers. Hmmmm....I guess their web server is still running on a Sun 3/60. 8-)

  140. Last gasp.... by katorga · · Score: 1

    Moving to x86 has always represented the last gasp for a risc company based on the history of almost all of the other "workstation" vendors of the early 1990s such as Intergraph, SGI, and others.

    In the past buyers paid a premium to these vendors to be roughly 5 years ahead of the curve. Example, Sun had 4GB/s memory bandwidth when Dell was limited to 500MB/s. The workstation vendors have not been able to maintain this 5 year lead and have lost market accordingly.

  141. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the GPL wouldn't allow it. BSD uses a very liberal license that is much less restrictive.

  142. I would love to use these servers... by un4given · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, Sun has been changing their corporate focus every few months. Linux rocks, it sucks, it's OK, it rocks.

    They bought Cobalt, rebranded the systems, and then scrapped the whole product line.

    Sun is really spoiled by the whole "Big Iron At Even Bigger Prices" business model and I fear that this foray into x64 is another passing fad.
    Then the product goes away and I get stuck with a handful of oddball systems to support.

  143. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by urlgrey · · Score: 1

    Er, aren't the Sun drivers for Linux open-source?

    No.

    Can't the OpenBSD folk just port them?

    No.

    As any low-level hardware developer will tell you, there are a couple of EXTREMELY dangerous assumptions here:

    1.) That the original work done is understandable. Writing drivers is H A R D. Sometimes--often in fact--there are VERY subtle, extremely easily overlooked things happening in drivers. This is exacerbated by the fact that in many cases, the work done in developing a driver by one group is garbage and basing code on garbage becomes REAL garbage. No sir. Not interested.

    This is to say nothing of: what happens when it breaks in subtle, hard-to-reproduce fashions? Where do you go for your documentation on it? Another driver? [shudders]

    2.) That the original work doesn't have encumbered binaries or other equally troublesome hooks.

    To get to the real heart of the matter it's this: if Sun will provide Linux developers documentation, why won't they provide BSD developers that same documentation?

    If you really want the scoop on this, here's a good starting point: Sun OpenBSD documentation article

    --
    Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
  144. The censored ads by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    have all of the class and dignity that I have come to associate with Scott McNealy.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  145. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are happy with RHEL and non of the features of Solaris 10 (like zones) seem necessary to you, you probably shouldn't. Just go ahead and run RHEL on these boxes.

    If however you're running Solaris 8 or 9 on Sparc, then switching to Solaris 10 on Opteron might make sence in many cases.

  146. From the looks of it by TrekkieGod · · Score: 3, Funny
    that just might be the next Sun ad.

    Informed Customers would rather wax their butt cracks with an angry wasp than buy a Dell. On the other hand, they like our dual power supplies.

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    1. Re:From the looks of it by richlv · · Score: 1

      i hate it when modpoints expire so fast that i don't have any when i see really good posts.
      btw :
      "At Sun, we're the radical engineers that build "ass-whoopin" technology - we're not Miss Manners and we never want to be. We ask all you contrarians out there to e-mail us your own provocative ad headlines: my-headline@sun.com"

      why don't you send them this quote along with a link to the original post ? ;)

      --
      Rich
    2. Re:From the looks of it by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      i hate it when modpoints expire so fast that i don't have any when i see really good posts.

      Well, I don't really care about the mod points, but I'm always glad when something I write is funny to someone other than myself.

      why don't you send them this quote along with a link to the original post ? ;)

      Somehow I doubt they'll use it, but just to make whoever's reading the e-mails join in on the laugh, I took your advice and sent them an e-mail linking to the original post. E-mail below:

      Your ads were a subject at slashdot today, and at least two people believe that the truthful opinion of a particular poster (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162138&cid=13 554103) would make a great ad.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  147. Story is true by Zer0s · · Score: 1

    As a unfortunate Dell employee. I asked a friend down in Round Rock Servers if this was true. He did say that it is true, but it happened on monday. I didnt read through all 300 comments. But yah, it did happen, but on monday.

  148. I almost ROFL'd by mattnuzum · · Score: 1

    Holy cow, I almost ROFL'd. My head was like 4 inches from the floor. If I'd laughed any harder I would have been out of my chair.

  149. To those of you just steaming... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    ...and preparing to write a scathing post where you flame Sun for their stupid marketing...

    Know that you've been had. You've just been influenced by their marketing campaign, and the fact that you even bothered to come here and be annoyed by it proves that it worked ;)

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  150. Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

    I guess it went over your head. Seeing as I didn't get modded funny, it went over the mods heads too. It was meant to abuse the word to point out the absurdity of its usage in his comment. (and the absurdity of the comment).

    PS: I think your catagorizing of people who swear in an argument might be wrong. Just a thought. There is no black and white line to judge people on if they swear. There's no automatically "He lost because he swore" rule, and there's not "He won because he didn't swear" rule. Might be worth a moment of your time to ponder.

  151. "Benchmark studies show Dell Sucks!" is hilarious! by javaxman · · Score: 1
    those are awful ads. First off, they do almost as much pitching for the competition as they do Sun.

    Oh, come on, you *have* to admit, that at the very least, the "Benchmark studies..." ad is pretty damn funny. I almost blew coffee out my nose.

    note: I had to paraphrase it in the subject, there's not room for "proves that"...

    they do almost as much pitching for the competition as they do Sun.

    Dell is a name that everyone is familiar enough with, and enough people associate with poor-quality low-cost PCs, that mentioning their name near a word like "suck" isn't necessarily a bad move for a company selling competing server products that a business might actually depend on.

  152. Sun Should Have Hired The Dell Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had him on the front of the ad sitting by one of the servers smoking a doob with the stats posted in the ad, and him blowing a big smoke ring and just simply saying "Whoa....."

  153. Just like VISA by duerra · · Score: 1
    The point that you are missing is that ( and this is a rule of marketing) is that the market leader never mentions the any competitors, but the rest of the companies ALWAYS mention the number one company so that potential consumers will equate their product with the market leader. Think about how often Pepsi mentions Coke in their ads but Coke NEVER mentions Pepsi. This is literally taken my from Marketing 101 class that I took oh so many years ago.

    mmhmm...... But they don't take American Express.

  154. Re:Unfortunately... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Speaking of unix I found this blog by a SUN engineer working on Solaris.

    FOr uptime on critical I.T., unix is the only OS that has garanteed uptime and advanced application profiling.

    I dont know why Solaris here gets such a bad rap? Its clearly years ahead of Linux.

  155. Benchmarks - read the fine print! by MrPower · · Score: 1

    Sun machine running Solaris 10 vs Dell running Windows.

    Ah, OK - even if the Dell machine isn't certified for Solaris, why didn't Sun compare Windows with Windows or Linux with Linux?

    Improves their performance maybe?

    Move along, nothing to see here.

  156. Too little too late by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
    Brought all the latest stuff into a lab recently. The worst was RLX, they really suck and they realized it and no longer make hardware. Right there with them was SUN. They spent more time getting their stuff to run than any other vendor, including RLX and even then it didn't work as specified. They suck. Their equipment sucks and breaks a lot. It didn't used to be this way. They used to produce equipment that just ran and ran and ran.

    What was this stunt? Last Ditch Effort before bankruptcy I bet. Unless Microsoft gives them more money like they did to save Apple.

    I have to wonder why they would buzz Dell anyway. Why not buzz something more apropos like HP or IBM? After all, Dell sucks too. Maybe they are competing for last place?

  157. Scott McNealy VS Michael Dell by TarryTops · · Score: 0

    Bitch-slapping is fun. They're just playing with each other. I think they're in love.

    --
    Java Oracle Linux Enthusiast
  158. Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. by buysse · · Score: 1
    Zones.

    Quick explanation -- think of it as a chroot on steroids, or a slight enhancement over freebsd jails. It's a virtual userland, with a separate init that shares the same kernel and devices. Since the init for a zone is just another process on the system, it can have its memory, CPU, and bandwidth usage managed by the Solaris SRM tools.

    You can set it up so that zone A gets a guarantee of 80% of the physical memory, and 90% of the CPU -- run your production site there. The root zone (where you manage other zones) gets a guarantee of 10% of physical memory and 5% of the CPU available. At this point, you can run zone B, with a testing site or development environment that has a guarantee of 10% of the memory and 5% of the CPU. Where it gets cool is when you realize that if zone A only needs 60% of the memory and 40% of the CPU at any given time, zone B now has 40% of the memory and probably about 60% of the CPU available to it.

    It's like an extremely dynamic version of VMware that only runs Solaris. The closest LInux analog is Xen, but Linux doesn't have the resource management tools that make this really work.

    There are a few other reasons as well - there are commercial applications and environments that don't support Linux (though not anywhere near as many as there used to be). More importantly, the Java VM on Solaris is better than the Linux port. If you're running a J2EE system ($DEITY help you) or a simple servlet engine, I've had better luck on Solaris than with Linux. Of course, I could probably give you just as many reasons to go the other way...

    --
    -30-
  159. Images taken down by sinebubble · · Score: 1

    Sun appears to have pulled the images. Anyone manage to grab copies? Nothing on coral or google cache.

    --
    Brian
  160. Get real and say hello Data General ][ by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Uh, they got rid of what was Cobalt, most of the developers (if not all) are gone I belive the good ones went to Google.

    Clotting? Do you seriously belive that? They have canned a ton of people, they don't have anyone implmenting, any R&D that is left is likely taking place in India, along with the support (that delay is as annoying as hell).

    Wall Street? Huh, stock looks like it is maybe ~40 cents about is 52 week low, that isn't love thats pity.