Slashdot Mirror


Spider-Man 3 Villains: Sandman & Venom

datemenatalie writes "As posted on ComingSoon.net, "Kirsten Dunst confirmed rumors to Zap2it that Thomas Haden Church will play Sandman and Topher Grace is Venom in director Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3." As written, ""We have really great people though as the villains in this film, Thomas Haden Church and Topher Grace -- Venom and Sandman," said Dunst, who plays Mary Jane Watson in the Spidey films. "Maybe I wasn't supposed to say that," she added before reversing her claim. "It's the other way around. You're right," she conceded to a journalist." Spider-Man 3 is set for release on May 4, 2007."

412 comments

  1. Venom by kevin_conaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can we have a villain who looks like he just hit puberty?

    "I'd take over the city right now...but I have to stop at CVS for Clearasil first"

    1. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... if you actually read the comics you would not be asking that question.

      In other dumb ass questions... How can we also have a superhero that looks like he just hit puberty?

    2. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what, is Toby McGuire the Marlboro Man or something?

    3. Re:Venom by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      Well Gee Wiz... It worked for Spidey! ;-)

    4. Re:Venom by softends · · Score: 1

      If you can summarize that backstory in a few sentences, then they may be able to take care of it quickly in the beginning of the movie.

    5. Re:Venom by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      i doubt it! People will feel like they were rob! well, at least the comics fan who had read the amazing spider-man 298 to 300 and bsically all venom books.

      -Sold a mint condition amazing spider-man 300 for 5 $-

    6. Re:Venom by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      A lot of the marvel movies have been closer to the Ultimate franchise than the original comic books. So it looks like Brock will be a fellow geeky kid scientist like peter who has his experiment go wrong (can anyone get superpowers any other way?)

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    7. Re:Venom by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Does it also matter that I didn't know that Topher Grace and Tobey McGuire were different people? They look nearly identical - like brothers.

    8. Re:Venom by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      daredevil most boring way to get superpowers

    9. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i concur...Toby Maguire and Topher Grace DO look identical...such odd casting...
      Venom is supposed to be this blonde haired, rough/gruff ex-con who is built like a brickwall....
      Topher grace is gonna have to put on 150 lbs and get bigger than Arnold and hit puberty to get his five o'clock on to pull this one off....
      *SIGH....

    10. Re:Venom by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that's part of the point. He's like Spiderman/Peter Parker's evil twin, as it were. They're probably playing up that angle in the movie.

    11. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, did you ever read the comics? Venom is spidermans "Black Suit" it was a symbiotic alien that bonded with Peter Parker... sooooooooo one would think that Tobey Mcguire is a skinny geeky nerd, so if we are going to have a doppelganger for a skinny geeky nerd, we should find an equally skinny geeky nerd... Oooh I know, how about Eric Foreman??? Oooh Good idea, we can even get Sandman to call him Dumbass a few times

    12. Re:Venom by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      You know, the headline is wrong. If you read Dunst's actual quote, she said that Thomas Hayden Church (who looks like a blonde ex-con) was to play Venom, and Topher Grace was to play this guy. The casting makes much more sense that way too, since Topher Grace looks so sickly.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    13. Re:Venom by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure that is the point since Venom started out as a spidey alternative (tho he got bigger later- more the Rock size- topher better start working out if he is going to be in the sequel).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Venom by Romancer · · Score: 1

      relevant pics link

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    15. Re:Venom by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      No - see, Venom is a giant black beast. HUGE.

    16. Re:Venom by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Disregard my post. I had no idea there were two distinct sand men. Seems like trademark law would apply or something.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    17. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way we can have a hero who looks like he's just finishing with it

    18. Re:Venom by e_xworm · · Score: 1

      I guess they're gonna take the Ultimate Spiderman path for Venom, where Venom is just another teenager like Pete. This will explain how they're gonna fit the whole "get the uniform and take it out" thingie inside one movie :)

      --
      X~
    19. Re:Venom by BrynM · · Score: 1
      since Venom started out as a spidey alternative
      Didn't Venom start as Spidey's costume he nabbed during the Secret Wars?
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    20. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, you didn't read the books did you? Go find the original story. Venom began as the black suit Spiderman "aquired" During the Secret Wars.... turns out that the suit is an alien symbiote that tried to take over Peter Parker.. the suit eventually broke away from Parker and found himself attached to his current "host" Eddie Brock, a convict sent up by spiderman (for sake of arguement there is also Carnage, which is a spawn of Venom that attached itself to Eddie's cellmate Cletus)

      So don't try arguing with someone of you don't know the facts

    21. Re:Venom by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You are correct- there wasn't even a man in the suit at first.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    22. Re:Venom by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      I am glad you mention Carnage. I was trying to remember who the red one was.

      Was he named Venom before he merged with Eddie Brock?

      And what was it like to sleep with Principal Skinner's mom?

    23. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of what I commented on was from memory as I do not have those books handy to reference. So as to wether he was "Venom" before merging with Brock, to the best if my knowledge I seem to remember the suit existing for a time without a host, so it seems possible that he was.

      Skinners Mom was ok, for a granny chick, sometimes those old chicks know the best moves, I dunno about having to wear the studded leather mask and calling her "mother" as I drilled her ass though... Apu's wife on the otherhand......

    24. Re:Venom by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      If he was not named venom until it merged with Brock, then it is fair to say that what is known as venom is always a huge black beast.

      According to Marvel's website, it would seem I am correct, you are incorrect and must commit ritual suicide with your light saber.

    25. Re:Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I know, it's a week later, but I was on vacation :-P It appears you are correct in your analogy, checking various sources, i ended up at the ultimate geek site (no not /. ) I know it's not the most reliable source, but...: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venom_(comics) gives a pretty good writeup on the story.

      Now on to killing myself with my lightsaber.... I would, but it appears my Krayt Pearly are out of tune.... but that's ok because my force pool was drained by using mind tricks on your gf to make her think I was you.... and she is definitly better than Skinners mother.... esp when she does that... ah what am I saying... you KNOW already....

      But I am not afraid to admit I am wrong, and in this case I have been bested, good show

  2. Bad news by bman08 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's when they start putting multiple big names in villain roles that these superhero franchises usually start to go straight to hell. Everybody wants screen time even at the expense of comprehensible storyline. Case in point, Batman and Robin, the worst movie ever made.

    1. Re:Bad news by jhutch2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Batman and Robin was bad, true...

      But nothing compares to the sheer mind-boggling awfulness that was Showgirls.

      A movie so bad that naked boobs couldn't even save it!

    2. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, in Spider Man 2 they had Green Goblin II and Doc Ock.

    3. Re:Bad news by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, The Avengers is the worst movie ever made. (but your point is still valid.)

    4. Re:Bad news by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess the X-men movies are the exception?

    5. Re:Bad news by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      No, they sucked ass as well.

    6. Re:Bad news by hahiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please, you guys aren't even trying hard! Have you only seen movies from the last 10 years?

      Try ``Manos" or ``Daddy-O" or ``Beyond the Valley of the Dolls" or ``Assault of the Killer Bimbos" or the sequels to ``Attack of the Killer Tomatoes" or ``Reefer Madness" (which is boring as all get out) or hell, even Star Wars, Episode I. . . .

      The usual candidate auteur of Cinema Meirde is Ed Wood, but I think his films have an incompetent genius to them. (Few agree, though.) You might try ``Plan 9 From Outer Space", his most famous film, but ``Bride of the Monster" and ``Glen or Glenda" are also worth a whirl.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    7. Re:Bad news by mrAgreeable · · Score: 1
      It's when they start putting multiple big names in villain roles that these superhero franchises usually start to go straight to hell.
      The "multiple big names" in question consist of a guy who's probably still best known from a T.V. show in the early nineties and some other guy from a TV show. They've both turned in great performances in other roles, but they're hardly "big names."

      Batman and Robin had Uma Thurman and Arnold Schwartzeneggar. I really don't think Sam Raimi's going down that path at all.
    8. Re:Bad news by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      X-Men is a team of superheroes, you need a team of supervillians for them to fight.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    9. Re:Bad news by jjr1 · · Score: 2

      When did Thomas Haden Church become a big name?

      --
      Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
    10. Re:Bad news by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      The second Batman movie -- Batman Returns -- had Danny De Vito as Penguin and Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman, and it wasn't too bad, in my opinion. (Even if you didn't like it, you'll have to admit it was much, much better than Batman and Robin.)

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    11. Re:Bad news by hayh · · Score: 1
      Uh, in Spider Man 2 they had Green Goblin II and Doc Ock.

      "Green Goblin II" was only alluded to in the end; he wasn't really in the movie per se. Which does raise the question, though, why isn't he in Spiderman-3?

    12. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Avengers was actually an great movie -- until it was edited down by the studio for the release. The original (un-edited) is a joy to behold.

    13. Re:Bad news by trekstar25 · · Score: 1

      After his excellent performance in Sideways. You should check it out, hilarious movie.

    14. Re:Bad news by drsquare · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yeah, cos Spiderman 1 had such a brilliant, gripping storyline that didn't insult the intelligence of anyone over the age of five.

      Superhero films aren't meant to be taken seriously, they're supposed to be pretty stupid, that's the whole point. Just look at X-men, it's like a live-action version of a children's cartoon "I know I'll use my magic laser vision to burn the rope."

    15. Re:Bad news by moviepig.com · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ...We have really great people though...

      Moreover, even a Spidey-flick optimist has be curious about what Dunst meant by "though"...

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    16. Re:Bad news by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Hellooooo??? "Wings," that little show on NBC that ran for more than a few years? Church played the lovable airplane mechanic, Lowell.

    17. Re:Bad news by crashcodesdotcom · · Score: 1

      I thought he was the Hobgoblin?

    18. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, duh! Of course that movie was bad.

      You can't have The Avengers without at least one of the big three: Captain America, Iron Man, and Thor.

    19. Re:Bad news by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      That's why X-men works.. they are a team and they generally work AS a team, as do the villians.

      In conventional superhero films with multiple villians, the villians are usually seperate subplots, and the hero's just have sidekicks who get a subplot in their relation to the hero.

    20. Re:Bad news by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A supervillian can have superpowered henchmen. Henchmen are unlimited. (Provided they are used as background characters.)

      Actually, I think the orgnial point is a specific case of a general rule: A movie can have no more than two-three main characters, before it starts to suck. This is in essence based on the fact that it takes some screen time to devlop a character, and there is only so much time in a movie. So, any time you have more than two or three main characters you end up underdeveloping one or all of them. If you underdevelop one, they are no longer a main character. If you underdevelop all, your movie just became trash.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    21. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Batman Forever was pretty decent and that had Tommy Lee Jones and Jim Carrey as the villians. I guess its more about picking the right people for the roles.

    22. Re:Bad news by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      No, the Hobgoblin was a different villain that just happened to find a stash of the Green Goblin's old equipment. Harry Osborn becomes the second incarnation of the Green Goblin.

    23. Re:Bad news by ReverendLoki · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's when they start putting multiple big names in villain roles that these superhero franchises usually start to go straight to hell.

      I like to think that's why they cast the likes of Thomas Hayden Church and Topher Grace in these roles. Though both are well-recognized, neither really has the amount of star power where they could do any real damage. I mean, have you seen the typse of roles Thomas Hayden Church has taken lately? George of the Jungle 2? Rolling Kansas? And Topher Grace is still most recognized as the guy from That 70's Show.

      Not that I fully agree with the casting, but I do think they are pulling from the right echelon of actors - underappreciated veterans for whom a role like this can be a huge step for. I certainly wouldn't cast anyone along the likes of Schwarzeneger (too lazy to look up the spelling) or Jim Carey or Tommy Lee Jones.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    24. Re:Bad news by mshaslam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For a truly obscure and a truly mind numbingly bad movie try The Irish Gringo. It redefines the genre of bad movies. Until you have seen this movie, you really have no idea how awful movies can be. I'm not kidding. This one makes The Avengers look like The Godfather II.

    25. Re:Bad news by infonography · · Score: 1

      Showgirls? Ha! Yes, Ha! I say.

      did you suddently and thankfully forget Waterworld? (Wish I could)

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    26. Re:Bad news by sgant · · Score: 1

      I have to admit "Manos: The Hands of Fate" is almost unwatchable even when watching it through MST3K...even though that remains my favorite MST3K of all time.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    27. Re:Bad news by Dausha · · Score: 1

      ". . . there is only so much time in a movie."

      Yes, but you can always do like they just did in Battlestar Galaga (sic) and throw up a "to be continued."

      Actually, they sort of did that in Matrix. Never mind.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    28. Re:Bad news by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Waterworld wasn't a bad movie. It simply wasn't as good as the hype predicted, or as good as something with, up to that piont, the largest budget ever *should* have been. Showgirls, OTOH, was actually bad. Almost as bad as "Dracula: Dead and Loving It" or "Meet the Fockers". There was a movie I saw this spring in which I almost got up and left mid-film, but I can't recall the title right now. Either way, Waterworld was only bad in that it was implausible, much like "The Core" and most other movies that involve some kind of science. :)

    29. Re:Bad news by fakedupe · · Score: 1

      NO NO NO, This is the worse movie I've ever seen: http://imdb.com/title/tt0120820/
      I only have myself to blame, but... FUCK YOU Wayanseses and FUCK YOU David Spade!

    30. Re:Bad news by angelo · · Score: 1

      Thomas Hayden Church was just in a little road trip movie that won all sorts of awards. It was called "Sideways".

    31. Re:Bad news by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

      Bah. 'Big Trouble' had a HUGE big name cast, with most everyone sharing as main characters. Pulp Fiction also had a huge cast, with main characters sectioned into vignettes. The same is true of Sin City. All were great movies, IMHO, (if you like Dave Barry anyway).

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    32. Re:Bad news by spunktastica · · Score: 1

      It is Spiderman 3 you know. Everyone watching knows the story of Spidey and MJ now so they can devote more time to the baddies.

    33. Re:Bad news by slaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can Showgirls be bad? No movie with that many boobies and thong-clad women in it can truly be bad!

      Hating Showgirls is like hating electricity or modern sanitation!

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    34. Re:Bad news by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look, there are bad films, and then there are Bad Films. As crap as Showgirls may be it has features like semi-professional camera work, audible dialog, a plot that is not only coherent, but can actually be discerned just from watching the film, and a complete lack of 5 minute long nausea inducing strobe light scenes. Until you have seen the true horror of something like The Roller Blade Seven you don't really know bad films. Try reading some of the user reviews to get some idea - but be aware, until you've seen TRB7 you can never truly understand how bad it is; you'll think you know, but believe me, you don't.

      Jedidiah.

    35. Re:Bad news by Cramit · · Score: 1

      heh...you're all wron this http://imdb.com/title/tt0332348/ is the worst movie of all time (released in any manner) I have seen high school film projects of better quality ( actulally I don't think I have seen high school film projects that are much worse then this)..try to find it and behold it's awfulness

    36. Re:Bad news by OverDrive33 · · Score: 1

      Spoiler: Sandman will be too powerful, Spidey and Venom will form an uneasy alliance, but only after an epic battle between the two with no clear winner.
      Hence - not *actually* two villans.

    37. Re:Bad news by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      still though, I'd watch it again.


      Showgirls that is, not Batman and Robin. God that was awful.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    38. Re:Bad news by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Thats why its called science fiction. If everything presented in movies was plausible, that would make things kind of boring (explosions in space in movies like star wars, to name just one). I thought waterworld was enjoyable if you just took it as a fun, fantasy type movie.

      --
      I got nothin'
    39. Re:Bad news by kcarlin · · Score: 0

      Waterworld wasn't a bad movie. It simply wasn't as good as the hype predicted, or as good as something with, up to that piont, the largest budget ever *should* have been.

      Ishtar - actors - dialogue - sand + water + tattoos = Waterworld. On the plus side of the equation, there was nobody in the film that one could claim was actually wasted on such a project.

      --
      Free Adam Smith! (Or best offer.)
    40. Re:Bad news by ScoLgo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hrrmmm... it might have something to do with his initials...?

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    41. Re:Bad news by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Or my favorite, Pinata: Survival Island (aka demon island) about a bunch of college kids on an underwear scavenger hunt on an island where they awaken a posessed PINATA (the worst CG pinata you'll ever see at that) who runs around the island killing people like he's f'ing rambo.

      I've never seen anything worse.. Saw it at a screening in OC, then found the DVD in the $5 bin at WalMart so I -had- to get it and put my friends through it too. A movie so bad Jamie Pressley couldn't save it.

    42. Re:Bad news by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      They didn't just throw up a "to be continued" in BSG (Galactica, btw) [and "sic" is only used when you are directly quoting another source and are absolving yourself of a grammatical error that they made]. This mid-season finale has been planned for months and well publicized to fans of the show.

      While we don't get new episodes until January, I'm glad they the cast and crew got the break they deserved (they are back at work now filming the next episodes).

    43. Re:Bad news by j3tt · · Score: 1

      Mr Schwarzenegger is busy taking care of California to even consider any offers from you.

    44. Re:Bad news by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      That's sad casting IMO. Didn't Brock pump a lot of iron? Wasn't Brock stronger than spider-man because the symbian amplified Brock's strength, which was more than Parker's?

      Topher Grace is poor casting.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    45. Re:Bad news by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is not a bad movie! It's a good movie dressed up as a bad one! Plus, it has a screenplay written by Roger Ebert. Come on, how can that be bad?

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    46. Re:Bad news by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      The second Batman movie -- Batman Returns -- had Danny De Vito as Penguin and Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman, and it wasn't too bad, in my opinion. (Even if you didn't like it, you'll have to admit it was much, much better than Batman and Robin.)

      I agree, in fact, I'll go as far as to say I really liked the first 2 Batman movies (and Batman Begins, but that's a whole 'nother story.) Had they stayed on that track they'd have a sweet little franchise instead of one poisoned by Batman and Robin ...what were they THINKING... how could they have thought "Y'know, this is way better than the first two!" and put it to print? Plus I think they should have stopped making them when they stopped using Michael Keaton, he was great for the role, Val Kilmer? eesh...

      PS: Love Val Kilmer, but Batman? Real Genius, Top Gun, Heat, Top Secret? Sure.. Batman? Not a shot in hell.

    47. Re:Bad news by Minwee · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, making Waterworld kept Kevin Coster from doing anything truly dangerous for most of the year and taught Joss Whedon a very important lesson in "Never Do Anything Like That".

    48. Re:Bad news by Worminater · · Score: 1

      or live action version of a, GASP, comic book?

    49. Re:Bad news by e_slarti · · Score: 1
      Batman and Robin was bad
      Waterworld was bad
      Showgirls had boobies, but was bad
      For true horror in badness, check out Battlefield Earth sometime...

      "To err is human, to really mess things up takes a computer, and to make mind-numbing, nausea-inducing, cancer-causing vitriolic prose it takes a Scientologist."

    50. Re:Bad news by Worminater · · Score: 1

      also; hobgoblin is a mercenary who made a pact with the devil for super strength and reflexes; he stumbled on a cache of weapons just like harry did at the end of spiderman2

    51. Re:Bad news by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I thought this: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060666/ was the worst movie ever.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    52. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you underdevelop all, your movie just became trash.

      No, it just became pr0n

    53. Re:Bad news by hahiss · · Score: 1

      Well, it has a screenplay written by Roger Ebert, so pretty gosh darned bad. ;)

      I imagine that people with taste can disagree about this, but to me it felt like a bad movie dressed up as a good movie dressed up as a bad movie.

      It really isn't as good as the early Russ Meyer's stuff---especially ``Faster, Pussycat. . . Kill! Kill!", which may well be one of the best film ever.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    54. Re:Bad news by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      Consider that MST3K couldn't make that movie watchable.

      Ed Wood's oeuvres are at least watchable in some respects. Manos is just plain unwatchable.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    55. Re:Bad news by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Explosions could happen. There must be *some* source of breathable - and therefore flammable - air on those ships... :)

    56. Re:Bad news by EntropyEngine · · Score: 1

      No, I must correct you, Gappa, the Triphibian Monster is the worst film ever made...

    57. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the science isn't the part that gets us.

      When the characters react totally wrong to situations, it becomes unplausible, and entirely groan-filled.

      Like, say having the main character laugh whenever someone said "the". Retarded people don't even act like that.

      Or Hayden Christiansen. Whatever he does, its just not right.

    58. Re:Bad news by tyler083 · · Score: 1

      i hate to tell you this... but while that movie was bad, Twister is the worst movie of all time.

    59. Re:Bad news by mayamaniacslash · · Score: 1

      watch batman begins if you haven't. that's as serious as a super hero movie can get, yet still a decent movie. At some point, I had to remind myself that I'm watching a movie about guy fighting crime in a bat costume and not to take it too seriously.

    60. Re:Bad news by bfischer · · Score: 1

      What does a Linux OS have to do with a Spider-Man movie?
      http://www.symbian.com/
      I thought Venom was more of a symbiont.
      http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=symbi ont

    61. Re:Bad news by Moofie · · Score: 1

      To my mind, the best science fiction IS that which is plausible. Science fantasy is a different kettle of fish. Space opera (Star Wars, etc.) frequently falls under the "Science fantasy" rubric.

      Nobody buys my taxonomy, though...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    62. Re:Bad news by naoursla · · Score: 1

      A film teacher I had argued that a film should have one character who changes and one character who is the main force of change. Everyone else is a supporting character feeding the story towards that change. If more than one person changes the movie loses focus and becomes uninteresting.

    63. Re:Bad news by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      No, The Avengers is the worst movie ever made. (but your point is still valid.)

      Informative?? Given that the Avengers isn't even in IMDB's bottom 100 movies of all time,
      there are far worse movies out there than that.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go dust my Emma Peel action figure. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    64. Re:Bad news by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Come on, lest we not forget Gigli? The only thing I liked about Gigli was that it actually lived up to the hype. People kept saying it was the worst movie ever and I was thinking to myself, "come on, there are soo many bad movies it can't possibly be worse than some I have seen." And yet, that fateful night when it finally came up in our netflicks queue, I can truly say that yes, it was the worst movie ever. If you don't believe me, watch it for yourself, but make sure you have a barfbag and a blindfold handy, you'll want to protect your eyes or you might tear them right out of you face.

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    65. Re:Bad news by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      Battlefield Earth is another underappreciated source of hilarity.

    66. Re:Bad news by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Or even worse, Glitter, Crossroads, or From Justin to Kelly sit in the worse movies of all time category.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    67. Re:Bad news by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      id sooner watch showgirls than Alexander, which also had tits...though it had fewer tits, than guys giving each other the naughty-eye

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    68. Re:Bad news by Ykant · · Score: 1
      A film teacher I had argued that a film should have one character who changes and one character who is the main force of change.

      It's that simple, eh? Then why isn't your teacher out making films?

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
    69. Re:Bad news by Dausha · · Score: 1

      First, I can stick in a sic where I want--I was trying to avoid people from correcting my intentional misuse. :-) Second, as a fan who heard nothing about the break, I would disagree with "well-publicized."

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    70. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Brock pump a lot of iron? Topher Grace is poor casting.

      It's not unheard of for actors to pump a lot of iron before shooting as a character who pumps a lot of iron. Ed Norton total bodily transformation before shooting American History X and Fight Club comes to mind. Before that he was in what? Rounders, and Woody Allen's musicial Everyone Says I Love You?

    71. Re:Bad news by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      See, that's just a way of sayin you don't get it. Obtain a copy of The Rollerblade Seven. Watch it. Now watch a film like Glitter or From Justin to Kelly and marvel at how remarkably easy to watch it is, not featuring 3 or 4 consecutive replays of a 30 second shot of a fight scene so badly choreographed your grandmother could do better filmed from the worst possible angle and without anything even vaguely resembling actual dialogue or plot to motivate the mind numbing repitition of pointless things you don't want to see. As bad as the acting and story in Glitter may be, you can at least only find yourself bored and, after TRB7, spend your time admiring the camerawork, sets, foley work and simply laugh at what a poor job the editor has done rather than wonder what hallucinogens he was taking and fighting the urge to hunt him down and kill him.

      Jedidiah.

    72. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. ??

    73. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then watch Manos: The Hands of Fate. Same category; so bad, it's bad *again*.

    74. Re:Bad news by naoursla · · Score: 1

      Actually, he is.

    75. Re:Bad news by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How can you talk about Thomas Hayden Church and not mention The Specials? It's one of those sleeper movies nobody remembers, but it's absolute comic genius.

      Church is perfect as the overbearing leader of the sixth- or seventh-best superhero team on Earth.

      I freakin' love that movie...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    76. Re:Bad news by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Well at least we're talking about similar levels of Bad now. Personally I find TRB7 to be considerably more unbearable - the strobe light scene being the ultimate cap to what had been, up to that point, generally intolerable. Could some of the other people out there who have actually seen TRB7 speak up - I know there are some of you out there. Help explain the misery.

      Jedidiah.

    77. Re:Bad news by TheMadcapZ · · Score: 1

      I got you all beat.

      King of the Kickboxers - absolute worst movie ever made!!!!!

      Relax Cap!!

      If you don't believe watch this roadkill sometime, if you can find it I don't have access to movie databases but if somebody could reply with a link, that would be swell.

    78. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know why, but I suddenly got this urge to start collecting bad movies...

    79. Re:Bad news by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      Henchmen are unlimited

      You are confusing henchmen with minions.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    80. Re:Bad news by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      There can be a lot of fun to be had in watching bad films. One of my favourites is "Raider of the Living Dead" a particularly awful film that is unbelievably funny (though a decent sized audience and some alcohol generally help). You should note, however, that a large number of the user reviews of The Rollerblade Seven begin along the lines of "I really like B-grade film, so this sounded great" and finish along the lines of "this is a truly evil, horrible film, nothing can truly prepare you, or describe to you how bad it is". That was pretty much my experience: I love watching B-grade crap sometimes. Heading along to the marathon at the the Incredibly Strange Film Festival is great fun, and you get to see a lot of truly appalling low budget crap. The Rollerblade Seven really is something else though, and there's just no decribing it. People talk about "getting the barf bag" for crap films in a joking manner, but I've known people who were literally physically ill from watching TRB7 - mostly due to the extended strobe light scene (great for epileptics and migraine sufferers too!). If you want to collect bad film then truly TRB7 should be in your collection as it is a whole new level of Bad. Just beware, the film was recut by the executive producers and released as "Legend of the Rollerblade Seven" and "Return of the Rollerblade Seven" - but don't accept editing by a sane person who was actually trying to make money out of the shit presented to him, go to the original version "The Rollerblade Seven".

      Jedidiah.

    81. Re:Bad news by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Try watching the elvis movies from the 50's and 60's, same concept, except Justin and Kelly don't have the drug problems that Ms. Carrey or the king had.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    82. Re:Bad news by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is not a bad movie. It doesn't belong on your list of bad movies.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    83. Re:Bad news by TheJorge · · Score: 1

      First, I can stick in a sic where I want--I was trying to avoid people from correcting my intentional misuse.

      On Slashdot, you cannot stop people from correcting your misuses. Intentional or not.

    84. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Not only that, The Lizard will be kicking around this one too. At least,
      Dr. Curt Conners appears in Spidey 2 and was supposed to reprise his role in 3. Methinks the screen's gonna get a little crowded.

      Cheers,

      JHVH1

    85. Re:Bad news by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Actually, I specifically avoided mentioning it because I rather liked it. Yeah, it's another role that is rather silly (c'mon, let's face it), and noone's heard of it, so it fits in well with the example. But, oh well.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    86. Re:Bad news by DestroyAllZombies · · Score: 1

      I challenge anyone to find a worse movie than http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0143096/ . Not counting movies by George Lucas, anyway.

      --
      This login name for sale.
    87. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Seven Samurai didn't really hold together well, did it?

      Or maybe it's just harder to do well.

    88. Re:Bad news by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It may be easier when the character is really an existing archtype. You get a lot of baggage for free. It's also why actors have a value - they often bring a lot of baggage from previous movies to either use or play against. (for example john wayne in a western- you get a lot of stuff for free).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    89. Re:Bad news by ComputerSherpa · · Score: 1

      Unless the one you underdevelop is the title character, as in Star Wars Episode I.

      --
      Information wants to be anthropomorphized!
    90. Re:Bad news by gcalvin · · Score: 1

      On the plus side of the equation, there was nobody in the film that one could claim was actually wasted on such a project.

      What about Dennis Hopper? But as bad as Waterworld was, it didn't keep Costner from making the even-more-unwatchable The Postman two years later.

    91. Re:Bad news by Opie812 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't surprise me to see an actor change his physique for a role

      Check out pictures of Christian Bale in The Machinist and then in his next movie Batman Begins. It's like two completely different people (one of them being a holocaust survivor and the other being all bulked up)

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    92. Re:Bad news by coronaride · · Score: 1

      worst movie ever? obviously, someone has not seen this! worst...movie...ever!

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, go into business for themselves.
    93. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with that assessment re: two-three main characters.

      I'm in the wrong crowd here - but "Love Actually" was a brilliantly executed film which had almost all of the characters as the central characters (from memory, it's at least 10 to 15 characters).

      In my opinion, was it successful? Yes? Why? Because the director was very talented at inter-twining stories effectively.

      Now let's talk about the majority of directors... Yeah, you're right - they can't even sustain one character.

      Now that I think about it ... this probably stems from the fact that American directors aren't able to have more than a few main characters - because the story is normally the central element (eg. Jerry Bruckheimer - aka. Mr Explosions, or Matrix PtII and PtIII - the characters meant NOTHING). On the other hand, UK directors tend to focus on characters and character development (which requires great acting rather than sp-fx or impressive sets).

      Ok, If we limit the discussion to USA, yes, movies can't have more than 2-3 main characters.
      Anonymous

    94. Re:Bad news by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      True, but I could actually see Thomas Hayden Church in that role. He's so animated, has the physique for it, and can look pretty darned angry if he wanted to. Besides, he was awesome in sideways.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    95. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's when they start putting multiple big names in villain roles that these superhero franchises usually start to go straight to hell."

      Dude, wake up. The first Spiderman movie sucked big hairy nigger balls. Too much bad CGI for such a boring plot.

      No, this is not a troll. The first one really did suck.

    96. Re:Bad news by raoul666 · · Score: 0

      Whoa there cowboy. Anybody who's anybody knows that the worst movie ever made is PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE!!! It stars* Bela Lugosi, and is about aliens who plan to take over the earth with zombies, or something. Doesn't matter. Written/directed by Ed Wood. To sum it up, worst.movie.ever.

      *By star, I mean he died 4 days after shooting began and Wood reused the same footage over and over again, except when he really needed a new shot, when he had the same character played by a man with a cape over his face. No, I'm not kidding.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    97. Re:Bad news by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      someone has not seen this!

      I'd suggest this instead, but that'd be cheating.

    98. Re:Bad news by cvas · · Score: 1

      Didn't Brock pump a lot of iron? Wasn't Brock stronger than spider-man because the symbian amplified Brock's strength, which was more than Parker's?

      Something tells me they won't be going with the comic version of the suit's origin, so they probably feel just fine changing details for Brock as well. Unless they plan on spending the first 10 minutes of the film explaining Secret Wars.

    99. Re:Bad news by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      You know, I actually enjoyed The Avengers. But then, I'm a big fan of Uma Thurman. Still, I thought it was aperfectly decent bit of over-the-top action/spy/goofy fluff.

    100. Re:Bad news by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget this. We are on slashdot, after all.

    101. Re:Bad news by aarku · · Score: 1

      I guess the Lord of the Rings movies are an exception?

    102. Re:Bad news by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      I really hope they at least don't dump the part where Paker wore the suit first, and subsequently dumped it... The secret wars might be a bit much to swallow in the movie...

      Still, after Brock was fired from the Bugle, he became obsessive, angry, wanting to kill Spider-Man... That's a key part of the story - it gives the villain drive. A villain without drive is IMO a very poorly written villain. A villain simply driven by wealth is a flat villain.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    103. Re:Bad news by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      I've never gotten their obsession in the Batman films with burning up the bad guys - by which I mean that in for some reason in the films they have to kill the baddie.

      First they have the Joker, and kill him. And throw away Joe Chill without using him. But after that, they decided for some mad reason that they had to use two er film, because next u it was Oswald and Selina. Then Harvey and Edward. And then Ivy and Victor and Bane. Bane worst of all, they threw him away in a cameo.
      Who was in the latest one? Ra's and Jonathon. See, still blowing two at a time.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    104. Re:Bad news by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 1

      Not for long. I think Ahnold is strictly a one-term-in-ator.

      --
      My father is a blogger.
    105. Re:Bad news by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Several people here have given examples of movies which they feel breaks this 'rule'. I'm sure there are some: it is just a rule-of-thumb after all. An excellent director, with an excellent cast and script, can break any rule.

      However, take a good look at your exceptions first. Quite often people who you think are main characters aren't: they are supporting characters, who are in reality are nothing more than archetypes with a quirk. Sometimes they are actors playing themselves, or even their best-known character. None of that breaks the rule: they are characterized someplace else (in popular culture), and not in the movie. Because of that, the movie can concentrate on those it really needs to.

      Oh, and for movie series: The rule, I feel, still holds to an extent. No one movie in the series can have to many main characters. Either the movies are so interlinked they can't be separately watched, or each installment will focus on a subset of the characters.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    106. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your teacher is a simpleton.

    107. Re:Bad news by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Actually, Spiderman 1 made quite a bit of sense. It was Spiderman 2 that threw my suspension of disbelief out the window, and it was due to a slight flaw that they could have made mention of the origin of in the movie: why did his powers wane?

      I don't remember reading about that back in my comic-book days, so it wasn't "fresh" in the mind of at least this (ex-) comic-book reader.

      By the way, have you given up on your ad hominem-style debating technique? Good on you! (It's true that you get more flies with honey than vinegar, that is, if flies are what you're after.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    108. Re:Bad news by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Look on CPAN for Tie::Hash::Cannabinol -- a Perl module that dutifully forgets all the data you give it.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    109. Re:Bad news by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      I find that most movies made before WORLD WAR II, to not be that good.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    110. Re:Bad news by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      Was that the rollerblading movie that had a talking, glowing orb?

      Because I know such a movie existed, I just can't remember what it was called.

    111. Re:Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was character development in the Lord of the Rings?

  3. Old & incomplete news. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative


    Old news...Diggreported this two and a half weeks ago. Also, in addition to Venom and Sandman, the Hobgoblin will be played by James Franco (see Freeze Dried Movies for the scoop).

    James Franco as Hobgoblin looks to be a good call, and Thomas Hayden Church is a lock for Sandman, but Topher Grace as Venom??? Seriously...I think Grace is a decent enough actor, but can he pull off Eddie Brock? Personally, I think he would have been better cast as Cletus Kasady (aka Carnage).

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Old & incomplete news. by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      Seriously...I think Grace is a decent enough actor, but can he pull off Eddie Brock? Personally, I think he would have been better cast as Cletus Kasady (aka Carnage).

      I agree. I think the biggest stumbling block for Topher Grace to get over would be the fact that Eddie Brock is supposed to be a pretty big guy. He's a weightlifter in his free time. Topher Grace would need to take a LOT of steroids to make for a good Eddie Brock.

      I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, though. Sam Raimi's done a fucking awesome job with the last two, I'm sure he knows what he's doing with this one.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    2. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      James Franco's character was the second Green Goblin, and never the Hobgoblin.

    3. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      In the Ultimate Spider-man comics, he isn't much bigger than Peter. Am I the only one who thought Toby McGuire & Topher Grace were the same person for several years?

    4. Re:Old & incomplete news. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the article on Freeze Drided Movies:
      Now as for the other two stars listed above we've been told that Thomas Haden Church will in fact play SANDMAN and that James Franco will play HOBGOBLIN and not the Green Goblin II (like in the comics). No more info can be given at this time, but I've confirmed this with various sources and apparently it's quite well known.
      Don't know why I post links to articles if noone's gonna read 'em...
      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    5. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I suspect that the movie will merge the characters of Venom and Carnage.

    6. Re:Old & incomplete news. by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      I think Tophar Grace is an interesting casting choice, because he's got a similar amount of vulnerability/nerdiness as Tobey Maguire, and I can imagine them really playing up the fact that Venom is Spidey's "evil twin," similar in every respect except being quite insane.

      Of course, CGI Venom could end up looking like the Hulk. Blech.

    7. Re:Old & incomplete news. by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1, Funny

      "but Topher Grace as Venom?"

      Seriously, that's as lame as having a goofy nerd like Toby McGuire as Spider-... er, damn.

    8. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Am I the only one who thought Toby McGuire & Topher Grace were the same person for several years?

      No, you are not.

    9. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Godai · · Score: 1

      Seriously...I think Grace is a decent enough actor, but can he pull off Eddie Brock?

      I had the same initial reaction but remember, there are two Eddie Brocks. There's weightlifter psycho Brock (Amazing Spiderman) and there's childhood friend Brock (Ultimate Spiderman).

      As much as I love the former, the Ultimate Spiderman series has proved that good, careful storytelling can really elevate the comic book medium above it's peers. The Ultimate Venom storyline seems to me to a lot more fertile ground from which to spring a movie version. Topher Grace could fit that role well, especially given that he could probably have pulled of Peter Parker -- as Venom & Brock they might go for a darker, path-not-taken version of Parker. That'd be a pretty interesting contrast.

      And, of course, this all assumes that Dunst hasn't mixed up her mix up. She doesn't seem the sharpest knife in the drawer, so maybe Church really is meant to be the musclebound psychotic. I guess we'll find out eventually.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    10. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Old news...Diggreported this two and a half weeks ago."

      Who the hell has time to read Digg? For every interesting story on Digg there are at least 500 bad ones. Most of the so called "Diggs" are blatant rip offs from other web sites or simple links to random blogs that are doing the same. It's not a website I like to read especially considering the comments are filled with clueless idiots.

    11. Re:Old & incomplete news. by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 2, Informative

      "but Topher Grace as Venom?"

      Seriously, that's as lame as having a goofy nerd like Toby McGuire as Spider-... er, damn.


      Spider-Man was a goofy nerd from the very start. Have you been paying attention?

    12. Re:Old & incomplete news. by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      This just goes to confirm what I've been suspecting for some time: apparently I'm the only one on this planet that actually liked the Hulk movie. Sometimes it seems like everyone else expected it to be like the TV show, or perhaps the Saturday morning cartoons...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    13. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those familiar with the Ultimate Spider-Man line of comics would know that the Eddie Brock in that series (which the films have borrowed a lot from along with the classic Spidey series) isn't some body builder, nor was he a reporter... he was a kid a couple of years older than teen Peter Parker, who was a friend of the family to the Parkers, and both he and Peter inherited some research that their parents worked on... the research lead to Venom, which in itself creates the mass we know of, and resembles the current Ultimate Spider-Man video game a lot more than the Venom everyone here is familiar with.

      So Topher Grace is what I expected to be cast as Venom since Hayden Church is too old.

    14. Re:Old & incomplete news. by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      Wait isn't that the kid from that 70's show? WTF!? That's absolutely awful casting...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    15. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

      I used to think Toby McGuire and Elijah Wood were the same actor.

      I was actually pretty impressed that he got the lead role in both Spiderman and Lord of the Rings until I found out.

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    16. Re:Old & incomplete news. by mr_mozz · · Score: 1
      "remember, there are two Eddie Brocks."
      Indeed. From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venom_(Spiderman_vill ain)#Ultimate_Venom
      "In the Ultimate Marvel universe, Eddie Brock is Peter Parker's childhood friend, and the symbiote is not an alien, but the creation of their fathers. Richard Parker intended it to be used for medical purposes, but Brock Sr. was more interested in the military applications. Eddie continued his father's research, and created two symbiotes. One bonded with Peter, leading to a variant of the "alien spider costume" storyline. Afterwards, he warned Eddie of the dangers of the symbiotes, but Brock nonetheless bonded with the other one, becoming Venom. It's interesting to note that whilst the original version of Venom had a personal vendetta on Spider-Man, he just knew he was Peter Parker, this version had a vendetta against Peter and the Spider-Man identity meant nothing to him."
      I think it is likely that Raimi will work with this version of the Venom story.
    17. Re:Old & incomplete news. by xystren · · Score: 1

      I got burnt thinking Toby McGuire and Jake Gillenhall were one in the same in the October Sky and Cider House Rules era.

      Cheers, Xyst

    18. Re:Old & incomplete news. by ncmusic · · Score: 1

      No I liked Hulk too. The ending was horrible and overly contrived otherwise I thought it was a good origin movie.

    19. Re:Old & incomplete news. by BootNinja · · Score: 1

      especially since he's been working with the Ultimate story line for Spiderman itself. Consistency is nice.

    20. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't know why I post links to articles if noone's gonna read 'em...

      I don't know why either. Maybe it's because you are a fucking moron and think that nobody else knows about google. Maybe it's just because you are a karma whore. Either way, I think a lot of people here would rather you NOT post the first three links that google returns just to get a bunch of cracksmoking slashdrones with mod points to fuel your karma addiction.

    21. Re:Old & incomplete news. by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I used to think Toby McGuire and Elijah Wood were the same actor.

      You mean they're not?

      I thought it was like Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro - one guy who uses multiple names for tax purposes.

    22. Re:Old & incomplete news. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I thought it was like Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro - one guy who uses multiple names for tax purposes."

      That's actually true...remember the movie "Heat" they starred in together? All done with mirrors, I swear.

    23. Re:Old & incomplete news. by zfalcon · · Score: 1
      "I thought it was like Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro - one guy who uses multiple names for tax purposes."

      That's actually true...remember the movie "Heat" they starred in together? All done with mirrors, I swear.

      You're close. They actually shot the scenes of the two actors separately. In no shot did they have them both together.

    24. Re:Old & incomplete news. by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      Nice try. Watch the movie in letterbox format and what do you see? Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino sitting at the same table. It's a story that's been repeated so often now that everyone believes it.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    25. Re:Old & incomplete news. by wattersa · · Score: 1

      Given that their faces never appear on screen together (except for one blurry, brief scene at night), it could have been done! :)

    26. Re:Old & incomplete news. by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Don't know why I post links to articles if noone's gonna read 'em...

      Taco? Is that you?

    27. Re:Old & incomplete news. by DupeMaster+Donkey · · Score: 1
      Taco? Is that you?

      The Monkey eats Tacos for LUNCH!

      --
      Persistence is futile. You will be metamoderated.
    28. Re:Old & incomplete news. by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      This would be the ideal actor to cast as Carnage. He's even got that red color scheme going on.

  4. Geez.... by JoeLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Topher Grace as Venom? He's so small/weak. The only thing that would be worse is if they cast his clone Tobey Mcquire as Spiderma....oh....wait.

    Seriously, I can see Topher being absolutely evil in the role of Venom, with just enough humor to be scary.

    I never understood what Sandman's story was...anyone care to enlighten me?

    1. Re:Geez.... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Geez.... by wheany · · Score: 5, Funny

      He was bitten by radioactive sand. Although since genetic engineering is the current boogeyman in Spiderman, I suspect in the movie he will be bitten by genetically engineered sand.

    3. Re:Geez.... by slaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sandman - the regular one - got his powers due by being irradiated while he was resting on a beach, giving him the power to turn his body into sand. He's basically a standard Spiderman thug/villian, other than that. He has tried to go straight in the past.

      The Ultimate Universe version has a less silly origin as a failed attempt at making a super soldier by OsCorp. That version seems more dangerous as well.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    4. Re:Geez.... by GodHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spiderman = Peter Parker = timid geeky nerd-type.

      Venom = Eddie Brock = Psycho ex journalist, built like a linebacker, competition-level power-lifter.

      Venom wasn't just some evil version of spiderman, he was better than spiderman - stronger, faster, able to beat his spidey-sense.

      Worst. Casting. Ever.

      --
      Just wait till some crappy band steals your nic.
    5. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you notice the homosexual bent on "merging" with Hydro-Man and feeling embarrassed afterwards?

    6. Re:Geez.... by msaulters · · Score: 1

      Topher Grace as Venom? He's so small/weak. The only thing that would be worse is if they cast his clone Tobey Mcquire as Spiderma....oh....wait.

      Seriously, I can see Topher being absolutely evil in the role of Venom, with just enough humor to be scary.


      WTF????! OK, I was excited to hear about Thomas Hayden Church... he's a dead ringer for Eddy Brock. I think they must have it mixed up. Of course, since the Venom character was a combination of Brock and an alien 'suit' that wants to kill Spidey for rejecting it, anybody could be inside, I'd just like to see Eddy (Olympic weightlifter) Brock played by someone a little meatier than Topher (male clone of Ally McBeal) Grace.
      --
      These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    7. Re:Geez.... by dave1g · · Score: 1

      i agree

    8. Re:Geez.... by dooguls · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. As much as I don't really like them, they should have picked someone like stone-cold or goldberg. At least they are the right size and have the appropriate amount of brains. Also Venom wasn't really funny. He was just mean. An earlier poster mentioned carnage who was a little funny. That would have been a much better cast.

      And whatever happend to the Lizard story line. The success of the films so far has been that they've been focusing on heros that are intimately involved with Peter's life. Doc Conners in fact has already been mentioned in the film. Why not keep the story tight and inter-related instead of branching out to new un-mentioned characters.

      --
      Sig 'em boy!
    9. Re:Geez.... by jafac · · Score: 1

      Major WTF for me.

      I thought they meant Neil Gaiman's Sandman.

      This Sandman looks stupid.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    10. Re:Geez.... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

      Hell, not only that, but in the first movie, there was an actor already cast as Eddie Brock, he was seen momentarily in the Daily Bugle's newsroom...

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    11. Re:Geez.... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info - for some reason I when reading the article I couldn't get an image of the DC Sandman out of my head. No, not the Neil Gaiman creation, the other one, with the sand gun thing.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    12. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone had better start force-feeding him the steroids right *now* if they intend to pass Topher off as Eddie Brock. Seriously.

    13. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Venom/Brock started working out/getting huge as a result of his anger and hatred towards Peter Parker - so, didn't he start of as a small little wimp like Peter? Obtaining the symbiotic parasite only intensified his anger and his physique, as Brock and the parasite both hated Peter their hatred fed off each other. My memory is shady, though.

      I like this casting, Peter and Brock should start from the same place - nerdy wieners.

    14. Re:Geez.... by killtherat · · Score: 1

      The least they could do is write it as some sort of nanotech experiment gone wrong. That would at least give it enough psuedo-science to make joe six-pack happy.

    15. Re:Geez.... by AirFrame · · Score: 1

      I can just see Spidey calling him "dumbass" somewhere during the movie...

    16. Re:Geez.... by Crimson+Midget · · Score: 1

      I can totally see the movie version of Sandman being made up of nanites rather than actual sand.

    17. Re:Geez.... by databyss · · Score: 1

      Yes you are correct. It was R. C. Everbeck.

      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0263472/

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    18. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate genetically engineered sand. It's so coarse.

    19. Re:Geez.... by babyblink · · Score: 1

      from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sandman_(Marvel_C omics) "The Sandman has the ability to transform into a malleable sand-like substance which can be hardened, dispersed, or shaped according to his will." Woah! I wish er...

      --
      [self dealloc];
    20. Re:Geez.... by schon · · Score: 1

      genetic engineering is the current boogeyman in Spiderman

      Actually, it's science that's the current bogeyman.

      Note that in the early comics (and TV show, for that matter), Peter Parker was a scientist, and most of his villains were either scientists themselves, or used the scientific discoveries of others. Spiderman used science to augment his natural abilities (webbing, etc.) When he encountered someone he couldn't beat, he used science to defeat them.

      Science was displayed as a neutral force, something noble, capable of being used for good or for evil, depending on the will of the person weilding it.

      That's all changed: the recent movies show Peter Parker as a victim of science - science made him a freak. He gave up science for the arts (phototgraphy.) The villains are all scientists, their goodness corrupted by science, leaving them hollow and evil.

      The moral of the movies is that science is evil, and must be avoided at all costs.

    21. Re:Geez.... by schon · · Score: 1

      I can just see Spidey calling him "dumbass" somewhere during the movie...

      Burn!

    22. Re:Geez.... by slackerfilm · · Score: 1
      What if... their concept is a cross between Venom and Carnage? As they have to change the origin, why not cross the two caracters?

      By the way, did anyone notice that Eddie Brock was in Spiderman 2? Just a glimpse but he was there.

      Why won't they bring out the Grey Hulk? That would be a fun movie. Oceans 11 meets Last Action Hero. What a concept.

      --

      throw the baby out. The bathwater is cold

  5. In related news... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sony pictures has hired a band of rogue ninjas to kill Kirsten Dunst.

    1. Re:In related news... by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      No, they have the Sony Enforcement Division to take care of such problems.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    2. Re:In related news... by TheOldSchooler · · Score: 1

      I coulda sworn for a second you said "hired a band of rogue ninjas to drill Kirsten Dunst." Wishful thinking I guess.

    3. Re:In related news... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Are the mods on crack? This is no laughing matter! Ninjas should not be taken lightly.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  6. Or maybe by Ikn · · Score: 1

    Or maybe, she -was-supposed to say it. Hey, free publicity!

    --
    I know nothing
  7. Mighty Morphin' Evil Duo by wheany · · Score: 5, Funny

    Set renderfarm to kill.

  8. Venom and Sandman?!?! by elasticwings · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not Venom and Carnage? At least they kinda go together.

    1. Re:Venom and Sandman?!?! by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      Probably because there was a greater backstory with Venom way before Carnage was conceived... The Rock would have been a good choice for Eddie Brock, aka Venom.

    2. Re:Venom and Sandman?!?! by elasticwings · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At the same time, there is a great background story involving Spiderman and the alien costume before Venom was conceived. I just think that the Sandman could be an entire movie and the alien costume could be an entire series of movies on its own. Although, I'm sure there will never be a secret wars movie.

    3. Re:Venom and Sandman?!?! by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you, I dont see how in 2 or 2.5 hours they can explain the whole Secret Wars/Symbiote costume.... At the least can hold out hope that the movie opens up with Spidey wearing the costume.... or ridding himself of it with Mr. Fantastic's help.

    4. Re:Venom and Sandman?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Rock? God damn! You should be sent to Gitmo and raped daily for saying that!

    5. Re:Venom and Sandman?!?! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      the alien costume could be an entire series of movies on its own.

      New Line almost made a crappy stand-alone Venom movie.
      Fortunatly, it's not to be. That will save us from another "Steel".

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Venom and Sandman?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, instead of choosing an actor with some talent let's just choose someone that's the _size_ we are looking for. Hey, I hear Hulk Hogan might be available, too...they should totally cast the Hulkster because not only is he big like Brock, he already has blonde hair!

    7. Re:Venom and Sandman?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give us a brief overview how your ass feels please.

  9. Publicity stunt by faloi · · Score: 1

    And yet another publicity stunt ("accidentally" releasing characters and names in an upcoming movie) works perfectly.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Publicity stunt by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if this is just a big publicity stunt.

      Think about it:

      -Early on in the development of Spiderman 2 there were rumors that the Lizard was going to be one of the villains. This turned out to be false.

      -Sam Raimi has stated multiple times that he had no intention of including the Venom story arc in any of his movies, because he wanted to recreate the comics he remember reading as a kid.

      I wouldn't be surprised if this is just a joke that Raimi and Dunst are pulling on the press.

    2. Re:Publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rumors were true. The Lizard was actually planned in the first drafts of the script but was eventually cut out because of time and budget constraints.

  10. Venom AND Sandman? by jandrese · · Score: 1

    Both villans are great, but I don't see how they're going to cram them both into the same movie. They're not exactly compatable. Plus they're both great villians (better than the comic book Doc. Oct at least), and I have no doubt either one could carry a movie alone.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Venom AND Sandman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd be compatible if Spidy gets the symboate suit and wonders if he should wear it or not because it brings out a dark side in him. He could consider this the only way he could stand up to the sandman. It'd give him powers not too unline sandman. In the end, he gets rid of the suit, but it's saved by topher and he puts it on to show an even more evil venon to be shown in movie #4

    2. Re:Venom AND Sandman? by rackhamh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Both villans are great ... Plus they're both great villians

      Yes, but what I want to know is, are the villians great?

    3. Re:Venom AND Sandman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if he has time, can he tell us if the vaillans are great? Or the villains, are they graet?

    4. Re:Venom AND Sandman? by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Funny though that was (and yes, it was) -- I believe he's saying:

      Both (comic book) villains are [interesting, exciting characters around which to base a movie].

      And:

      Plus, [the actors] both [do a good job portraying villains].

    5. Re:Venom AND Sandman? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      That's a good angle. I was too stuck in the "big movies must make villians obvious" meme, but the Spider-Man franchise has shown a willingness to diverge from the Hollywood formula in places and that could actually work.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  11. Red by cool_number_9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    With Topher Grace as Venom, I'd expect Kurtwood Smith to show up and tell Venom to behave or he'll be wearing Red's foot up his ass.

    1. Re:Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now that's fucking FUNNY

    2. Re:Red by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Supervillion?!!?

      Super dumbass.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    3. Re:Red by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      I've also heard that as part of his villian uniform, Red (the evil mastermind) will require Venom to wear his ass for a hat.

      I'm not sure an asshat is imposing for a villian, though.

    4. Re:Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also heard that Venom will have a Spidey-like love interest named Hot Donna.

    5. Re:Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Kurtwood Smith, before That's 70's Show, was better known as "Clarence Boddicker", a *REAL* piece of scum from Robocop.

      He would actually be a scary villan. Go see the movie if you haven't already.

  12. Before reversing her claim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thomas Haden Church and Topher Grace -- Venom and Sandman," said Dunst, who plays Mary Jane Watson in the Spidey films. "Maybe I wasn't supposed to say that," she added before reversing her claim.

    If you read carefully, you will realize that what she really means is that she will be playing Sandman, Thomas Haden will be playing Venom, and Topher will be playing Mary Jane. I might just pay for this one as they will finally have a sexy Mary Jane. Dunst just never did it for me.

    1. Re:Before reversing her claim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to point out the obvious, but if Topher does do it for you, then maybe the reason Dunst doesn't is because you don't like girls.

    2. Re:Before reversing her claim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, an A/C with admitted homosexual tendencies. Better make that a Catholic A/C given that Topher looks like he's 11.

    3. Re:Before reversing her claim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So has anyone ever pointed out your tendencies to be a bigot?

  13. Another boring love story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm betting Dunst and Venom hook up this time.

  14. Mary Jane Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Dunst, who plays Mary Jane Watson in the Spidey films

    It should say: Dunst who plays Kirsten Dunst in every film that she has ever done.

    She's perky but that's not acting.

    1. Re:Mary Jane Watson by capn_buzzcut · · Score: 1

      As long as her perky boobies are in it, I'll be glued to my seat.

      Or something

      --
      "And now, Frank N. Furter, your time has come. Say 'goodbye' to all of this, and 'hello'... to oblivion!"
    2. Re:Mary Jane Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...they haven't been in a movie in years. Have you seen those things lately? It's like an episode of the Golden Girls with all that sag going on.

    3. Re:Mary Jane Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here. How the hell does someone her age have such saggy boobs?

    4. Re:Mary Jane Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. The current practice in acting is to do everything and to do it in a boring way. Back in Hollywood's golden era, the practice was for an actor or actress to develop a single character interesting enough for movie makers to write for and place in different stories and situations.

      While I'm not saying Kirsten Dunst is a great actress, I doubt that in real life she is what you think she is on the screen. An example of an actress who would have done better to stay in character would be Sandra Bullock as the character she did in both Speed and While You were Sleeping. From what I've read about her, she is absolutely nothing like that character but it seems like that's the only character she can play.

    5. Re:Mary Jane Watson by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I think you're being a little harsh. They're pretty nice(NSFW).

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    6. Re:Mary Jane Watson by blowhole · · Score: 1

      I thought she was pretty amazing in Interview with the Vampire.

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    7. Re:Mary Jane Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. If she's playing herself in that movie, she's one scary lady.

  15. Wow! by meringuoid · · Score: 0
    Hey guys, do you think this Sandman's gonna be a tougher battle than the Skeleton Men from Pluto?

    Do ya? Do ya?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  16. ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoiler alert would've been nice...

  17. And with that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ....they kill the entire franchise.

    Stuffing 2 or 3 villians in with no time to develop the characters, especially the Venom character is the dumbest idea ever. Didn't they watch the Batman movies after the first one?

    1. Re:And with that... by UWC · · Score: 1
      Stuffing 2 or 3 villians in with no time to develop the characters, especially the Venom character is the dumbest idea ever. Didn't they watch the Batman movies after the first one?
      Yeah, you mean like Batman Begins? The most recent one? The one that not only chronicled Batman's origin, but also included villains Ra's Al Ghul, Scarecrow, and, to a lesser extent, mob boss Carmine Falcone, and ended up being the best Batman movie yet?

      More villains does not mean worse movie. Sloppy/cheesy Burton and especially Schumacher mean worse movie.

    2. Re:And with that... by Valiss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Didn't they watch the Batman movies after the first one?


      Did anyone?

      --

      -Valiss
    3. Re:And with that... by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      Did anyone watch the batman movies after the first one??

    4. Re:And with that... by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%. The Venom story alone should take up an entire movie. Putting Sandman in too, in addition to Hobgoblin still being around is just going to kill the ability to tell a cohesive story. Looks like this franchise is about to jump to shark.

    5. Re:And with that... by m50d · · Score: 1

      I did. I want those six hours back. Except the recent one, that actually ruled.

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:And with that... by dummyname12 · · Score: 1

      Ok, this has to be said. I read this article way too late and thus this will recieve no mod points, but maybe at least one person will read it and realize: Batman Begins (you remember... the good one) had two villains. Now shut up. You haven't even seen the movie yet.

    7. Re:And with that... by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

      I did.
      *Ducks, puts on asbestos suit*
      And I liked Catwoman and the Riddler -sorta.

      --
      I see 57005 people
    8. Re:And with that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't they watch the Batman movies after the first one?

      The first one? You mean this one? So bad, it was terrific? :)

    9. Re:And with that... by Tyklfe · · Score: 1

      ::shame:: ::small voice:: yes... ::/shame::

  18. Re:No Kingpin?! by IoN_PuLse · · Score: 3, Informative

    Erm, have you ever seen DareDevil? Daredevil and Spider-man exist in the same universe (AFAIK) and in DD Kinpin was played by Michael Clarke Duncan. I thought he did a pretty good job of it too. Colin Farrell on the other hand, still had the usual irish accent (Alexander anyone?) and the wide-eyed-vibrating-eyebrows look he uses for shock/surprise/anger/sadness/sorrow/everything.

  19. Please no, you are hurting us by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    Thomas Haden Church and Topher Grace? Can you say "Jump the Shark"? Sam, what are you doing to us?

    1. Re:Please no, you are hurting us by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Sucking down your dollars and laughing all the way to the bank, because god knows you'll be first in line to pay for the honor of getting screwed over again.

    2. Re:Please no, you are hurting us by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      What is really sad is that you are absolutely correct.
       
      Wait, I just swallowed my tongue... Ashton Kutcher is in the new Evil Dead movie? Say it isn't so Sam. Didn't you see the "Butterfly Effect" crapfest? Is someone from That 70's Show stroking your knob? Next you'll be telling us that Campbell won't even be making a cameo in either picture.

  20. Any guy can play Venom... by Regnard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the comics, Venom is composed of an alien symbiotic suit and the person, Eddie Brock. The Venom persona does look very muscular, but I think the alien symbiote would have a great part in giving Venom his menacing form.

    My theory is that in the movie, Topher Grace will get "beefed-up" by the alien symbiotic suit.

    --
    Need a color? Try 100 random colors
    1. Re:Any guy can play Venom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that Grace will most likely be bulked up via CGI.

      However, thinking about it, Venom would be better played by someone like, say, Dominic Purcell (Lincoln Burrows from Prison Break).

      I thought I remembered Eddie Brock being a scrawny little jerk, but then I went back to look at the comics, and Brock could probably break Topher in half.

    2. Re:Any guy can play Venom... by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Brock was already beefy, but I'm sure they'll take artistic license in the movie. I'm curious how they get the alien symbiote in there in the first place. I seriously doubt they're sending spidey into space, giving him the suit, giving him time to become aware that it's alive, get rid of it, and it finding Brock and trying to kill Spidey.

      I bet it's another Oscorp 'innovation'.

    3. Re:Any guy can play Venom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eddie Brock was built like a professional football player. Topher Grace needs to gain at least 50 pounds of muscle to fit this part.

    4. Re:Any guy can play Venom... by jlapier · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how are they going to fit the story of how the alien/parasite suit came into being? Am I the only one who remembers that Spidey himself used to wear it?

      Something tells me they will leave the whole Battleworld story out of the movie....

    5. Re:Any guy can play Venom... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt that they will work it that way.

          What they may end up doing is work up some kind of lab experiment, where the "Scientist" Eddie Brock was attempting to duplicate Spider-Man's powers/abilities, resulting in "nothing" but a pile of "useless" black goo...

          Meh, I wish they had just gone with the Reptile and or Electro or Scorpion or Mysterio...

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    6. Re:Any guy can play Venom... by Regnard · · Score: 1

      Then again, what's with the casting anyways?

      Given a choice between a more "thug-looking" actor, the casters choose a clone of Peter Parker. Will this actually play something on the storyline? Probably.

      --
      Need a color? Try 100 random colors
  21. Topher Who? All I care about is Campbell. by Errandboy+of+Doom · · Score: 5, Funny
  22. They need Silent Bob by stlhawkeye · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If only they can work in Kevin Smith somehow, we'll be treated to hilarious single-cut 15 minute scenes of conversations between frustrated and impotent twentysomethings waxing intellectual about every topics. And then Jay will make a joke about drugs! Ha ha!

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  23. Other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it will probably wind up being the other way around, with church playing venom and grace playing sandman. That is at least what the rumors have said all along.

  24. 2 villians?? by V3locity · · Score: 1

    Poor little spidey can barely handle 1, how is he supposed to handle 2 villians? And I totally agree, how did they come up with sandman and venom? Carnage and venom would go together much better and could actually be an interesting movie. The spiderman series has done well with the 2 movies so far, why would they risk what they have built by adding 2 villians in one movie?

    1. Re:2 villians?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, depending on which Venom angle they decide to go with (Battleworld suit/Cheesy Ultimate story), and if they decide to keep him alive at the end of the film, then technically, Venom isn't a villian in the traditional sense.

      Eddie/Venom kindof walks the line, bouncing from side to side. On one hand, yeah, he's out for Spidey's head. But on the other hand, he does have a tendency to right a few wrongs from time to time. While he had a hand in the creation of Carnage (who'd be a WAY better villian for the movies, IMHO), he also assisted in confronting him.

      Topher Grace? Oh HELL no!

    2. Re:2 villians?? by yabos · · Score: 1

      He'll get his ass kicked until the last 10 mins and then he'll magically be strong again and win.

    3. Re:2 villians?? by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      No, this is spider-man we're talking about, not Dragonball. Spider-man is always strong just _before_ he gets his ass kicked.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  25. Venom by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    Venom is not suppose to be there.
    Peter Parker nneds to find the costume first in that other dimension,,use it at least a couple of movies before figuring that the sentient being is trying to control him and getting help from Richard reed to get rid of it,,,then it finds another host.

    Guest they think people are dumb

  26. Venom Looks by GodHead · · Score: 0, Redundant

    +1 info? -1 Redundant? Meh.

    Venom:
    Height: 6 ft. 3 in.
    Weight: 260 lbs.
    Eyes: Blue
    Hair: Redish Blond

    Topher? Not so much, no.

    --
    Just wait till some crappy band steals your nic.
    1. Re:Venom Looks by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      In the Venom mini-series, Brock had a mullet.

      Psycho redneck journalist from outer space. Now THATS a movie.

    2. Re:Venom Looks by ash.connor · · Score: 1

      Dang.. I was expecting Schwarzenegger to make a come back!

    3. Re:Venom Looks by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

      I think Arnie might be a little busy right now.

      Although the citizens of the state of California might be happy if he took some time off to make a movie.

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
  27. You think casting is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Venom was the creation of the costume/alien that Spider-Man picked up during the Secret Wars which, likely, never happens in Raimi's Spider-Man universe. So keeping faithful to the origin in casting is useless when the origin is going to be altered.

    1. Re:You think casting is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jameson's son picked up the symbiot while on the moon. He was infected in Spidey 2. There were a couple of subtle clues. Like when he does that abnormally large jump from the dock onto the barge. Or that scene when they are working on the wedding invitations.

      The big question for me is will Spidey get some time in the suit in Spidey 3 or will we not get to see that. I'm not sure how they would explain it's hatred for Spidey without that. I would expect to see Spidey get tangled up in an adventure with Jameson's kid and have the suit decide to leave Jameson since Peter Parker would have a much more interesting emotional state. Oh well. Guess we'll have to wait and see.

    2. Re:You think casting is a problem by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Venom was the creation of the costume/alien that Spider-Man picked up during the Secret Wars which, likely, never happens in Raimi's Spider-Man universe. So keeping faithful to the origin in casting is useless when the origin is going to be altered.

      Which would be a valid point if Topher Grace was going to play the symbiote.
      But as I understand it, he's playing Eddie Brock: A big dude.

      Yet Topher is scrawny, skinny...

      Meh, I'm still disapointed at the dummed-down web shooters... and the fact that apparently, one of spider man's powers now includes excreting his own costume, since they spent so much screen time in the first movie showing us he can't make a costume that looks like that even if he tries. No matter, this is a "check your brain at the door" franchise, I managed to enjoyed the sequel once I knew that.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:You think casting is a problem by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

      This is great. After two blockbusters, my "Web of Spiderman #1" comic is still only going for $10 on ebay. Maybe third time is a charm.

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    4. Re:You think casting is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol,

      My roommate offered to take some valuable comics from my collection in place of rent. He was very stoked to get my copy of "Web #1".

      Too bad my copy of "Peter Parker #1" is not not worth very much (last I checked).

      -joshua

  28. Re:No Kingpin?! by DarthStrydre · · Score: 1

    I realize that comics and comic book movies are horribly inclined to mangle plotlines worse than a B soap opera, but wouldn't it be more logical if Kingpin was actually Michael Clark Duncan (the guy who played it in Daredevil).

    Also, it might be fun to include someone like Daredevil in the Spidey flick, as a cameo. You know, Ben Affleck with dark shades and civilian clothes tapping his way around with a cane in the background of some scene...

  29. Venom? by valkoinen · · Score: 1

    Venom is the bastardization of the symbiote suit Spiderman got from Battleworld. They will have to explain the birth story of the character again. Hell, even Reed Richards from the Fantastic Four had his part in the "creation" of Venom.

    http://www.alaph.com/spiderman/enemies/venom.html

    1. Re:Venom? by oscartheduck · · Score: 1

      THey'll use the Ultimate Spider Man origin instead. The movies are much closer to the Ultimate timeline than the original.

      If you're unaware, in Ultimate, the venom suit is originally a cancer-cure suit that the fathers of Peter and Eddie worked on. It becomes evil MUCH quicker than the other one did.
      It also makes a different style of Venom. He's much more mindless, more a tool of the suit. He's more sympathetic that way.

      --
      How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
  30. Clearly, you don't get the joke. by otis+wildflower · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anyone remember the Spiderman vs. Seabiscuit fiasco?

    Topher Grace was (strongly rumored) to replace Tobey Maguire for Spiderman 2, due to injuries Maguire suffered during the shooting of Seabiscuit.

    There were a few refs to it on That '70s Show as well.

    (hey, I don't do unemployment that well :p)

  31. Damn, I have to see it now by jjr1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now that my symbiate knows the cast, he'll definitely make me go see it!

    --
    Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
  32. Kirsten Dunst by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone ever get the feeling that Kirsten doesn't really "get" Spider Man or comic books in general?

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php?date=2004-07- 16

    1. Re:Kirsten Dunst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait wait wait...you're saying there's a girl that doesn't "get" comic books?

      Shocking!

    2. Re:Kirsten Dunst by yabos · · Score: 1

      Does she strike you as a hard core comic book reader?

    3. Re:Kirsten Dunst by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Hey, I hardly ever read comic books and I get them.

      Ok, seriously, I just wanted an excuse to post that link because I love the expression on Gabe's face in the last panel

    4. Re:Kirsten Dunst by seann · · Score: 1

      It is probably one of the most amazing comics EVER done by them.

      On a side note, I wonder how long until slashdot gets "livejournal" style replys?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    5. Re:Kirsten Dunst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares!? I mean, have you SEEN her rack?

    6. Re:Kirsten Dunst by SolvayGuy · · Score: 1

      "livejournal" style replys?, eh?...

      so, yeah, my girl left me today, but that is ok. i don't need her. the other guys in my d&d group all say she was too vain. ohmygod who am i kidding? i miss her. god i hope she still loves me. go i hope spiderman 3 is good.

      -_-;;

    7. Re:Kirsten Dunst by celery+stalk · · Score: 1

      Thank you for doing so too. The expression on his face, how it's being said...fucking hilarious. Thanks.

      --
      aaaand...whee!
    8. Re:Kirsten Dunst by seann · · Score: 1

      its funny because thats *exactly* what I was thinking.

      I of course meant the css "reply in page" feature.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  33. Spiderman by pureseth · · Score: 1

    Man I hope they don't mess this one up, they did good on the first 2, and now that they are going to be introducing Venom, that's a huge thing (at least IMO). If they do a good job on Venom I will be pleased, personally.

    --
    Add me as a friend!
  34. The original movie Eddie by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    Not sure why they wouldn't have used Eddie from the first movie: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0263472/ He looks more the part.

    Oh well.. I still have faith in Raimi- for now. I'd be lying if I said trying to fit Venom in before doing a movie with Spidey in the alien suit doesn't make me worried.

    1. Re:The original movie Eddie by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Still, that's not as much of a change as the actors playing Harvey Dent from the 1989 Batman to the later Batman Forever.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:The original movie Eddie by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      umm, maybe the first guy cant act? Lets look at his previous roles

      Casino Security
      Officer Stallone
      Kid in Lobby
      Assistant Texas Marshal
      Spineless
      2nd FBI Agent
      Tie Salesman

      He's never been anything more than a professional extra with maybe a line two. Most of these are small movies no one's ever heard of and he still didnt even have a named character. Not exactly the kind of actor I'd want staring in one of the leads of a huge blockbuster motion picture in an increadibly difficult role.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    3. Re:The original movie Eddie by shinma · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, that casting change is accurate.

      Harvey Dent originally appeared in the comics as a black man, but when he returned as Two Face, he was white.

      --
      Shinma
    4. Re:The original movie Eddie by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      It never occurred to me until now how similar their names are, in general terms:

      Billy and Tommy, both sort of generic, normal, "kids'" names.

      Dee and Lee, rhyming middle names.

      Williams and Jones, also fairly generic last names.

      But put 'em together and you get Lando Calrissian and a guy whose face looks like ten miles of bad road.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  35. Pic Comparison by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    That last link was great. Carnages weighs in at 190 pounds

    Venom Is supposed to weigh 260 pounds there's no way in hell Topher can fit that role.

    A Picture of Venom compared to a Picture of Topher

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Pic Comparison by milkman_matt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Granted while I couldn't agree more that there's no way Topher could possibly match the physique of Venom, I think they were trying to match him with Eddie Brock more than Venom.. They seem to go for a more character based story in these films than a "Throw these guys in costumes and have 'em brawl" approach. And I can see Topher looking like Eddie, but he seriously needs to pack on a few lbs before he's a bad mofo like Venom. That was Venom's appeal, just a big massive badass. Then again, they could always throw someone else in the Venom suit.. I'm on your side on this one, I think he's way too small for the role, but Raimi seems to know what he's doing, Green Goblin, Doc Oc, Hobgoblin, Spidey, all very well cast, even when you initially thought "what the ...!?"

    2. Re:Pic Comparison by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Which one of them was Hobgoblin in? And no Harry Osborn wasn't Hobgoblin, he was Green Goblin II

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:Pic Comparison by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Which one of them was Hobgoblin in? And no Harry Osborn wasn't Hobgoblin, he was Green Goblin II

      Yeah that was my mistake, whoops!

    4. Re:Pic Comparison by clymere · · Score: 1
      I recall Eddie Brock being an avid bodybuilder in the comics. The "suit"(well, symbiote) didn't make him big, he was just a big dude. You'll notice that other people wearing the suit didn't just grow...it was like a second skin. Spiderman had the same suit for a while and was his normal spidey size.

      In short, while hes a great actor, it seems like ridiculous casting. Brock/Venom were fairly one-dimensional anyways, you'd think it wouldn't be hard to find someone more fitting to play the role. The other movies were all good though, I have faith that they've got _something_ interesting planned.

      --
      once you go slack, you never go back
  36. Parent is -1 redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you didn't get the message the first time around.

  37. Virgin Suicides by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    If that was Kirsten Dunst "acting", then who is the living zombie they call Kirsten Dunst?

  38. They need Julia Stiles and make Spidey black by gelfling · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seriously in keeping with the hiphopmification of everything they have to make Spiderman Black. Hell he's not raised by his parents, he's alienated and poor. Julia Stiles can play his GF.

    1. Re:They need Julia Stiles and make Spidey black by gelfling · · Score: 1

      That is the first negative # I ever got here. Yaaay me.

  39. Re:Topher Who? All I care about is Campbell. by thebdj · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, I love seeing how Bruce Campbell gets put into the movies. I nearly died when I saw the first movie. I think it is great not only because I like some of the stuff Campbell has done, but also that Raimi still manages to get him into his movies.

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
  40. I smell a controlled leak by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Kirsten Dunst confirmed rumors to Zap2it that Thomas Haden Church will play Sandman and Topher Grace is Venom

    That should read, "Kirsten Dunst was told by the movie's publicity firm to accidentally confirm..."

    Folks- the only thing actors do independently is get arrested for DUI or drug posession. Everything else, they're told to do by their publicist or the publicist for the movie/studio.

    1. Re:I smell a controlled leak by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

      Do you really think they get arrested independently? I always thought they did that for the publicity as well.

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
  41. FBI Attacks Obscenity: +1, Patritoic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    All I can say is F The President.

    Patriotically yourz,
    Kilgore Trout, C.E.O.

  42. From the soundtrack... by Slashdiddly · · Score: 1

    Mr. Sandman, bring me a dream
    Make him the cutest that I've ever seen
    Give him two lips like roses and clover
    Then tell him that his lonesome nights are over.
    Sandman, I'm so alone
    Don't have nobody to call my own
    Please turn on your magic beam
    Mr. Sandman, bring me a dream.

    Hmm... uh, is there another Mr. Sandman?

    1. Re:From the soundtrack... by slaughts · · Score: 1

      Ladies and Gentlemen, this is our main event. Introducing in the red corner, the champion of the world, Mr. Sandman!

      (Original arcade PunchOut, for our younger viewers)...

  43. Classic vs. Ultimate by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Venom = Eddie Brock = Psycho ex journalist, built like a linebacker, competition-level power-lifter.

    Venom wasn't just some evil version of spiderman, he was better than spiderman - stronger, faster, able to beat his spidey-sense.
    That's only if you're talking about the classic character. In the Ultimate series, Eddie was about Peter's age, son of a colleague of Peter's father. And really, I think that's going to be closer to how we're going to get this because we don't really have enough time to explain "new costume from alien machine during massive crossover" as happened in the original series.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  44. Armchair Directors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at you all armchair directors! I will wait to see the movie BEFORE i make self-importance giving casting call critique!

    Click, click, and Away!

    1. Re:Armchair Directors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here, aren't you?

  45. Re:No Kingpin?! by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

    Only if Venom could kick his ass onscreen.

  46. Mmm... perky by abb3w · · Score: 1
    As long as her perky boobies are in it, I'll be glued to my seat.

    I'm afraid that's not glue....

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  47. It could work by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

    Topher could play Eddie Brock, he'll definitely be a lot smaller than what we remember him as being but it could work. Venom does add some heavy muscle on Eddie when in the suit and since I'm expecting Venom to be mostly CG anyway I think it will be fine.

    1. Re:It could work by yabos · · Score: 1

      They could always make him work out and get bigger. Toby wasn't that big before he got his "super powers" and although he wasn't that big after he still made it more convincing.

  48. No Man-Spider??? by XMorbius · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is when we're going to see the Man-Spider arc. And yes, I'm serious, I actually liked it.

    And also...

    Viva la Ben Riley!

    1. Re:No Man-Spider??? by Cerdic · · Score: 1

      This frightning beast is a reminder to Peter of just how wrong his brush with mutation could have gone.

      Peter sure got lucky - if he didn't mutate the way he did, the comics would have presented his love life as being like that of the typical Slashdotter. But then again, the Toxic Crusader does pretty well for himself with blind women.

      --
      Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
  49. Sounds like they're doing Ultimate Venom by Sandman1971 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Ultimate Spiderman, Venom was a symbiote suit built by Peter Parker and Eddie Brock's fathers as a cancer fighting suit (no I'm not making this up). Both Peter and Eddie are smart in this universe. Unlike the traditional Marvel universe where Brock was a beefed up photographer. Sounds like they might be using the origin from Ultimate Spiderman instead. In this one, Brock is just as small as Parker (but doesn't dress as a science nerd, but as a grunge rocker). That would sorta fit in casting Topher Grace for the role.

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
    1. Re:Sounds like they're doing Ultimate Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except didn't they already insert Eddie Brock as reporter in the first movie? This would seem to indicate that they are going traditional Venom storyline.

    2. Re:Sounds like they're doing Ultimate Venom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Ultimate" universe sucks donkey balls.

      If they can't do it right, damnit it, don't do it.

      sigh

    3. Re:Sounds like they're doing Ultimate Venom by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Actually, they screwed that up in Ultimate Spider-Man as well. In Ultimate Spider-Man, there was a bit where a reporter named Eddie Brock asks a question at a news conference, and is ridiculed because he works for a tabloid. I guess that there can be more than two people named Eddie Brock though...

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  50. Self-referentiality by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    It would also tie in nicely given that one of the Ultimate Spiderman storylines had Sam Raimi using footage of Spiderman while filming his movie which used Toby MaGuire and Kirtsen Dunst. Obviously, Raimi is just lifting the storylines from real-life events. They're not movies; they're documentaries!

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  51. Surprised? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    Insert Dumb Blond Joke Here....

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick! Get more red hair dye!!!

  52. Spidey vs the multiple Sandmen.... by aapold · · Score: 1

    Here's the Sandmen lineup: - The guy made of sand (marvel sandman) - Dream / Oineros/ Sandman / etc, the Neil Gaiman Sandman - A couple of Logan's Run Sandmen - The Kirby-era Sandman guy with the mask and sleep gun hrm. who'm I missing?

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  53. Disapointing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had hoped for the Lizard and Green Gob to be the main villains of SM 3... SM 2 seemed to be pointing in that direction...

    Perhaps they're filming 3 and 4 at the same time and she's confused? (or purposely misinforming?)

    And Venom is going to be tough to explain in a short origin cut during SM 3, since Venom is partly the creature SM used as his black SM suit after the whole Marvel Super Heroes Secret Wars thing... (wonders what that mini series collection is worth in mint in mylar) And the whole part where the Fantastic 4 examine the suit and break it to him that it's not fabric, but alive? And during that time period, wasn't Peter/Spidy seeing the Black Cat? Not MJ?

    The story changes so far had been tolerable (Gwen Stacy never existing, etc.) But what they'll have to do to get Venom in SM 3? Can't see it as a good thing.

  54. number of villains (and allies) by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

    incrementing the number of villains/allies is standard in making a blockbuster sequel ...

    Batman (1989) : 1 villains
    Batman 2 (1992) : 2 villains
    Batman 3 (1995) : 2 villains plus 1 sidekick!
    Batman 4 (1997) : 2 villains plus 2 sidekicks!

    1. Re:number of villains (and allies) by JamieKitson · · Score: 0

      You don't think Tim Burton might have something to do with that?

    2. Re:number of villains (and allies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Batman 4 had three villains, if you count Bane as a villain and not as a screaming, hulking mass of suck.

    3. Re:number of villains (and allies) by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      What are you taling about? There was no Batman 3 or 4. *sticks fingers in ears* LALALA I CANT HEAR YOU

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    4. Re:number of villains (and allies) by jinzumkei · · Score: 1

      Are you joking? Batman 1 has two villains!!! What about the incredibly evil playboy Jack Palance??!!

  55. It doesn't mean Venom will have a big role... by wickedj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If we look at Spidey 2, we saw hints at the new Goblin and Lizard Man but they didn't have big roles in the movie. Most of the conflict came from Doc Oc. Perhaps in 3, Sandman will be the big opponent while Venom might show up as an introductory role. Venom is a hugely popular villain/hero in the Marvel universe with a complete and interesting back story. It would be nigh impossible to have both villains in the movie without subtracting from the plot/quality. If I were Raimi, I would set it up that Spidey uses the symbiote against Sandman, realizes the suit is bad, gets rid of it (with or without F4's help) and we end with Eddie Brock finding it, setting up the next film (and a possible spinoff).

    I'm actually surprised that there has been no mention of the new Goblin or Lizard Man especially after being set up by Spidey 2. In any case, just because it's said that Topher Grace is in the movie, it doesn't mean he will have a huge role (yet).

    1. Re:It doesn't mean Venom will have a big role... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Yeah, that could work... still have to get the whole Secret Wars in there somehow tho...

    2. Re:It doesn't mean Venom will have a big role... by Senobyzal · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This is actually a really good idea. I think in one of the animated shows they just had the symbiote come back on a deep-space rocket (maybe something sent to investigate a comet or asteroid, I can't remember). Since JJJ's son is an astronaut, they could easily link in that character as well in a minor way.

      Rather than the F4 angle, they could use Doc Connor to help Spidey remove the symbiant in SM3. During that scene they could drop a hint about Connor's research on lizard regeneration, keeping the thread alive to bring in the Lizard as a main villain in SM4 or SM5.

    3. Re:It doesn't mean Venom will have a big role... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this scenario. It gives Topher a few years on steroids before Spiderman IV. Didn't the original Eddie Brock start out as a wimpy reporter and spend years lifting weights before encountering the symbiote?

  56. Sam, please don't submit to the market-droids! by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1

    Can you sell more Exciting Flexible Collectible Action Figures, T-shirts, Sippy-Cups, Left-handed Staplers, and Nintendo Dongles(TM) if you have more villains?

    Sure! But no one will want to see the frickin' movie. The plot will have holes. Motivations will be murky. No one will care about the characters.

    Just tell a damn good story and the money will take care of itself. Leave the over-the-top merchandizing and box office flops to Disney. They're the masters of that.

  57. What about MonkeyMan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can get Steve Ballmer to play the role. His powers could be to render 85% of the world's computers powerless with his BSOD and the ability to spread virii through entire companies in a single bound.

  58. Ultimate Spiderman venom version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The story line for venom/carnage in the Ultimate Spiderman comic is far easier an explanation that doesn't require any space travel. In that version the costume was an experiment in heliopathic technology that wraps the body in a special fluid that then diagnoses the disease and cures it. Spiderman was curious about the experiment after talking to Eddy Brock whos father was best freinds with Peters father, who was head of the project. He went to the lab that was once his fathers and pokes around. He finds the canister of black stuff, sticks his finger in it and the venom material wraps around him and picks up the mutated spider genes from Peter Parker. The genes are now permanently part of the "suit" and when Eddie comes around to the Lab he finds the stuff spilt on the floor and Spiderman fleeing the scene. He touches the venom substance and it immediately attacks him and engulfs his personality and transfixes on finishing the assimilation of Spiderman. Carnage wasn't brought in because the writter didn't like venom particularly but still wrote an interesting story. The Ultimate Spiderman Brock was just a normal kid who was trying to be cool even though he was a genious level geek like Peter and his father. Made him kind of annoying to Peter and everyone else. Hence the paranoid anger that the new venom took on.

    On that same topic kinda, X-Men 3 will most likely use the same "Ultimate" version for the Phoenix storyline. No space battles. No Dark Phoenix Saga. Jean Grey just goes nuts with her ever expanding powers and creates the Phoenix personality to deal with the guilt and anger it unleases. The whole time she's been with Xavier he has been stunting her powers so she doesn't go nuts and wipe out city. Oh yea and the Hell Fire Club is part of the whole shabang as well. Pretty cool stuff but this is just a guess at what the script will follow.

    1. Re:Ultimate Spiderman venom version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carnage has since appeared, but was unrelated to Venom... think "clone".

  59. Re:Topher Who? All I care about is Campbell. by nine-times · · Score: 1
    I think it is great not only because I like some of the stuff Campbell has done, but also that Raimi still manages to get him into his movies.

    I like the fact that you say that as though it's really really hard. "Raimi still manages to get [Campbell] into his movies." Now, do you think it would be hard because Campbell is so busy that he would normally refuse a part in a huge blockbuster?

    Or do you mean to imply that it'd be hard to slip him past the security guards who've been ordered to keep him off the studio lot?

  60. I think I can one up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Worst. Casting. Ever.

    William Shatner... I win.
  61. One "actor" we know will be in it by Cerdic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sam Raimi's yellow 1973 Oldsmobile.

    For those of you who don't know, the car appears in pretty much everything Raimi does. It was in the Evil Dead movies (though a "stunt double" was used for some parts). In Spiderman 1, Peter's grandfather drove it when he dropped him off for the library / wrestling event. I haven't seen Spiderman 2, so I don't know where it appears in that.

    --
    Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
    1. Re:One "actor" we know will be in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Oldsmobile was seen parked in Aunt May's garage in a few scenes.

    2. Re:One "actor" we know will be in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was in the garage at Aunt Mays.

    3. Re:One "actor" we know will be in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uncle Ben. He was Uncle Ben. You can't know about the Classic and NOT know about Uncle Ben! What kind of nerd _are_ you? ;)

  62. Re:No Kingpin?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Also, it might be fun to include someone like Daredevil in the Spidey flick, as a cameo. You know, Ben Affleck with dark shades and civilian clothes tapping his way around with a cane in the background of some scene..."

    yeah, because everyone knows how well a movie does when Ben Affleck is in it...

  63. Wrong ppl all the time... by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

    Toby was a good spider man.. he fit the cast perfectly.. Kristen Dunst... she didn't look anything like the comic books.. In X-Men.. Wolverine was almost right, except he was too tall. Storm was too young...

    1. Re:Wrong ppl all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When comparing comic books to movies nothing is ever going to be right. I dont see Jean Gray and Storm at a 36DD w/ a 20" waist, which is completly unrealistic. Wolverine is 5'3" 195lbs, woulda been great to find someone who fit that to match the comic book, but on screen they would look like a midget on steroids. I think the only way to look at movies based on comics is to consider them of an alternate reality (ie: ultimate x-men, age of apocalypse, etc) and accept them for what they are.

  64. sm2 villans by darknite1979 · · Score: 1

    You know she might have purposefully spread misinformation about who the villans are. Personally i think Church would be better as venom and gracey as sandman.

  65. Topher Grace? I think not by SengirV · · Score: 2, Funny
    Brock began an intense physical workout program hoping to reduce the stress his life had become. However, such physical exertions only increased his violent obsession with Spider-Man. Although his body had been honed to near-perfection, Brock's mind was reduced to an all-consuming vessel of hatred.

    Call me crazy, but that does not bring images of Topher Grace.

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

  66. Topher Grace isn't a bad call. by Lego-Lad · · Score: 1

    Spidey got the black suit during the secret wars - he shed the suit after it began doing crimes using Peter Parker's body while PP was sleeping. I lost interest (briefly) in comics after the secret wars, and I don't know all the much about venom in the current continuity.

    Topher Grace could have played Peter Parker, and IMO, that makes him a good choice for Venom.

  67. Hey! by Nosferax · · Score: 0

    How about Electro or Mysterio... eck, even hamerhead would be nice...

    --
    Remember... A boomerang IS NOT the best way to deliver a bomb.
  68. Too Many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Venom, Hobgoblin AND Sandman?! It sounds too much like there will just be pure special effects, zero plot and no character development.

    Honestly, how much screen time plus backplot could you really give three bad guys in 120 minutes? They have to deal with their "birth" as well as their interactions with Spider-Man, each other, and their own intensions.

    The should have just gone with Venom on this one and used it as a way to explore a superhero's dark side.

  69. It'll be different but good by tbcpp · · Score: 3, Informative

    First of all, let me say that Spiderman has never totally followed the comics. So any diversion here is nothing new. But hey, who cares? Spiderman 1 & 2 are still my top two favorite movies. This comming from a guy who never read the comics. If they director can make it look beleiveable and have a story, it will rock. That's what the other movies had. A great storyline.

    As far as the Sandman thing goes, aleph.com says that spiderman and sandman were allies. What if they make it so that you have a Spiderman & Sandman vs. Hobgoblin & Venom?

    Another thing I always wanted to see in these movies is have a villian come out of nowhere, trash the city a bit, and then have Spiderman come in and beat the snot out of him in 5 minutes flat. And have all that as the opening of the movie. Why do the battles have to last for 10 minutes with Spiderman almost dieing each time. If he's smart at all, he should have way more experience at the whole superpower thing by now.

    Anyway, that's my two cents.

    --
    Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
    1. Re:It'll be different but good by synaptic · · Score: 1

      What a twisted web we weave, when we practice to deceive.

      > This comming from a guy who never read the comics.

      That means nothing you say is relevant to the discussion of whether the movies should stick to the original plotlines. Let's see, Spider-man now has web glands instead of making the webbing himself. Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider who just happened to be loose at a museum instead of during the course of his own experimentation on arachnid radioactivity. I guess we couldn't have had that whole retarded scene in Spider-man 2 where he can't seem to get it up/out when trying to shoot his webbing; never would have happened in the comics. We're talking about 50 years of backstory that now is changed dramatically because Sam Raimi is a huge raging homo.

      Once you change one thing here or there, you end up changing a ton of shit later on because it doesn't fit anymore.

      Having Venom would be a travesty since it's unlikely the whole origin of the black suit symbiotic lifeform would be discussed or explained properly. Surely, the Fantastic Four movie that no one watched was a prelude to this but, no, Raimi will gay it up for joe six pack and his retarded son tbcpp so Spider-man 3 is among your "top three favorite movies".

      So basically, shut the hell up..

    2. Re:It'll be different but good by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Having Venom would be a travesty since it's unlikely the whole origin of the black suit symbiotic lifeform would be discussed or explained properly."

      You're right. Secret Wars just didn't suck enough in comic form--let's bring that shit to the big screen! Maybe Raimi can cram a Power Pack cameo in there somewhere too.

    3. Re:It'll be different but good by tbcpp · · Score: 1

      It's funny how most of the population appears to disagree with you. The movies were smash hits. Why? Not because they followed (or didn't) the classic spiderman story, but because the character seems so much like us. Superman has always (and will always) be a stupid story, why? Because he's perfect. But with Spiderman, we see that Parker must go through the same thoughts and struggles that we all go through. Sure, it's different than the books, but could it be the books that have the trashy plot?

      --
      Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
  70. sandman?? by m3rr · · Score: 1

    Ok. Venom I like, but I was hoping Doctor Curt Connors would finally become Lizard. Oh well, i guess Sandman will do. Two thumbs up on using Venom (too bad a 2-3 hour movie is not long enough to work in Carnage).

  71. Thomas Haden Church?! Spidey the new Batman? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Are the Spiderman films the "new" Batman? Are all of the villians to be played by celebrities of the moment?

    With that said, i like Thomas Haden Church. Just dont want to see him as the sandman... cause its not going to be beleivable.

    1. Re:Thomas Haden Church?! Spidey the new Batman? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      huh? Willem Dafoe and Alfred Molina arent celebrities?

      I think THC will be great, hes a good actor and hes NOT as famous as the previous villian actors

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:Thomas Haden Church?! Spidey the new Batman? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Willem Dafoe has been a choice for Green Goblin for a long time. Long before Spiderman was a movie idea and caught up in legal hell.

      I think people would have been really upset if Willem had not played The Green Goblin :)

      I dont know much about Alfred Molina's carear. But THC is all the rage lately because of his last film's success. THC is a great actor, and has been for a long time. It's only now that he is an "A" list celeb. And probably the only reason he has a chance at being in Spiderman.

  72. Do you wear spidey underwear too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And live in your mom's basement?

  73. Re:Topher Who? All I care about is Campbell. by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in spidey 2, campbell said he would be the one to defeat spidey, and in a way he did. So one would expect there to be a little bit of truth to his claim now that he will be Spider-man. Maybe posing as a fake spidey for a bugle hackjob or something.

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  74. Ultimate Spider-Man by Necromancyr · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression thus far that they were taking more from the Ultimate line of books for the majority of licensing/movie deals anymore then from the original 'universe'. In Ultimate, Eddie isn't a huge lumbering guy....he's smaller like Peter (not as small, but still).

  75. You got it wrong by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

    Thomas Haden Church will play as Venom and Topher Grace as Carnage.
    Also James Franco will play a small role as the goblin at the beginning of the movie.
    There will be no Sandman in this movie.

  76. Wrong, wrong, wrong. by schon · · Score: 1

    Don't say something is the Worst Movie Ever Made until you've seen this stinker.

    It's about a guy who's murdered, and his brain is transplanted into a dinosaur (by the people who murdered him), and his quest to win back his girlfriend.

    Even the premise screams "WHO LET ONE RIP?"

    1. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by BootNinja · · Score: 1

      but... Denise Richards... it can't be all bad, can it?

    2. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by fakedupe · · Score: 1

      We'll have to agree to disagree. Try Senseless, please do.
      Senseless actually had a budget and it was actually playing in theaters. Plus it sucks donkey dick.

  77. Re:Topher Who? All I care about is Campbell. by VAXcat · · Score: 1

    I've always thought Bruce Campbell would be perfect to play Kimball Kinnison in a movie based on any of the Lens books. That lantern jaw and righteous but bemused attitude would be a perfect fit.

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  78. "2-3 main characters, before it starts to suck" by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 1

    How many "main characters" did Traffic have? Or The Lord of the Rings movies? Crow T. Trollbot

    1. Re:"2-3 main characters, before it starts to suck" by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 1

      Even in the books I always felt that all of the characters in LOTR were underdeveloped. Maybe R.A. Salvatore and J.K. Rowling have spoiled me?

    2. Re:"2-3 main characters, before it starts to suck" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand your comment about Traffic, but LOTR just confirms the guy's point - even with the movies lasting 7 hours each, all I could tell you about the characters was there were 3 short guys, two guys with white hair (one was good, one was bad), John Rhys-Davies, the blonde with the longbow, and two guys with black hair that seemed to be interchangeable.

    3. Re:"2-3 main characters, before it starts to suck" by ikkonoishi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lord of the Rings had two main characters; Frodo and Aragorn. The rest of the characters were supporting roles to one or the other.

    4. Re:"2-3 main characters, before it starts to suck" by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      And technically, it was three movies so the whole point about "not enough time to develop everyone" could be ignored for more than three main chracters anyway.

    5. Re:"2-3 main characters, before it starts to suck" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The characters in LOTR are indeed underdeveloped, but it does not matter. LOTR it is not about the caracters but about the war, the characters provide only a point of view. The Harry Potter books instead are pretty much only about Harry Potter's life and growth, so the need of developing the caracter.

      Also because I like big sagas I really love LOTR, and I really despise Harry Potter :)

    6. Re:"2-3 main characters, before it starts to suck" by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 1

      Uh.......if you like big sagas, then how can you NOT like Harry Potter? Few other stories have been on the same scale as Harry Potter.

  79. Ultimate Venom Not 616 Venom by MrOuija_AK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For those of you that think Topher Grace is poor casting as Venom, you're right IF they use the normal Marvel Universe (Universe 616) version of Venom. However the Venom from Ultimate Spiderman would work great for Topher Grace. A childhood friend of Peter's who is going to college and continuing the research began by his and Peter's parents. The research project ends up becoming the Venom suit after interaction with Peter. This version of Venom is a college science nerd and more of an anti-Spiderman then the alien symbiote of the normal Marvel Universe. Considering Sam Raimi's voiced dislike of the Venom character I wouldn't be surprised if he decided to go with this alternate interpretation.

    I'll think this is even more likely if the Venom from the new Ultimate Spiderman game turns out to have the same Ultimate storyline.

  80. I dunno about Venom by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    I mean, except for the eyes and big white spider, the character isn't going to work very well on screen, due to his being solid black (with little to no reflective surfaces). Why not use Carnage instead? Far more over the top, and the costume would have a much greater screen presence.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:I dunno about Venom by Lesson+No.+25 · · Score: 1
      Why not use Carnage instead?
      I don't think Carnage stands very well on his own without Venom as a predecessor.
  81. Re:No Kingpin?! by TrevizeNet · · Score: 1

    Dig a link further into Daredevil and read the triva, about halfway down the page they mention that because the characters were licensed by different movie studios the characters can't crossover.

  82. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whoah, that's deep. Exactly -- he renounced crime after being "traumatized and humiliated" in his first homosexual experimentation:
    To battle Spider-Man, he had joined forces with a superhumanly powered criminal named Hydro-Man who could transform his body into animated water. In a freak mishap, Sandman and Hydro-Man combined into a grotesque mud-like creature. The authorities subdued the mud creature, rendering it harmless. The remaining amount of mud was sent to the police's forensic laboratory in Manhattan. There, police scientists sought to anlyze the composition of the unusual mud, but determined with the instruments at their disposal that it was completely inanimate. It was decided to seal it in a container and dispose of it. Apparently as a delayed effect of some of the analytic procedures, the mud spontaneously separated back into the two criminals, who then burst free of their container. Hydro-Man quickly departed to unknown destinations. Sandman was so traumatized and humiliated by the experience that he renounced his criminal ambitions.
  83. Re:No Kingpin?! by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    actually, in Spiderman 2 Thomas Jane makes a cameo in the scene when M.J. runs through the park at the conclusion of the film. From the wikipedia

    Id like to see maybe some Fantastic Four cameos. Ben Grimm and Spidey fighting and trading barbs could be good.

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  84. He-Man by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

    can't wait til the next He-man comes out.. we all know how popular the last one was.. maybe Kirsten could play She-ra, Tobey can play He-man.. oh wait..

  85. Venom Back Story by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    Yea, I really wonder how they're going to pull off the Venom backstory, what with the hugeness and divergence of the Secret Wars series. I guess they could do a LotR like mini story at the beginning, zooming over all the details and just giving the quick background with lots of effects.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Venom Back Story by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. See they're going to ignore Secret Wars entirely. I can tell you this because this movie is "SPIDERMAN 3." There was a lot happening in Secret Wars that didn't have anything to do with our favorite webslinger. They'll just come up with a reasonable (I hope) backstory that covers everything it needs to in a short amount of time. Longwinded backgrounds will not do so well in a teen action movie.

    2. Re:Venom Back Story by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      Meteor lands from space with odd black stuff on it....

      Gotcha

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  86. point of fact by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

    From WikiPedia:
    It's interesting to note that whilst the original version of Venom had a personal vendetta on Spider-Man, he just knew he was Peter Parker, this version had a vendetta against Peter and the Spider-Man identity meant nothing to him."

    Not true. The original version of Venom's vendetta was against Peter Parker as well. Eddie Brock hated Parker b/c he blamed him for the fact that Brock was fired from the Daily Bugle. I'm not sure about the symbiote; it hated Peter Parker/Spiderman for rejecting it, I don't know that there was ever anything to suggest it distinguished between them.

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  87. Toby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they could only ditch Toby. He's the lamest spider man ever.

  88. No..This is what kills batman by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Having mulitple villians is a poor idea. Two villians does not give you enough time to get a good background, and understand the villians motivation.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  89. Topher Grace!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless Topher Grace starts on steroids now, there is no way he could play Venom.

    Having read though the intro to Venom as a kid during the Marvel Secret Wars era, I distinctly remember that the person inside the venom costume was almost as big as the Hulk! His hatred for Peter Parker was so great that all he did was work out to prepare for his fight.

  90. Where did you hear Topher? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    Er, I thought that the prospective replacement was Jake Gyllenhaal.

    1. Re:Where did you hear Topher? by schon · · Score: 1

      Jake Gyllenhaal.

      Wasn't that the Federal Wildlife Marshall from Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back?

    2. Re:Where did you hear Topher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's donny darko.

    3. Re:Where did you hear Topher? by dtfarmer · · Score: 1

      Er, I thought that the prospective replacement was Jake Gyllenhaal

      You're correct. I had just watched The Good Girl when I heard that, and I was amazed how much Jake did look like Toby - they could totally swap the two of them out and no one would ever know.

    4. Re:Where did you hear Topher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zing! That's the sound of the joke going over your head, son.

      And you're wrong - Donnie Darko was never in J&SBSB.

  91. another interesting character by schunn99 · · Score: 1

    I see at imbd.com that dr. connors is back. Could this be the mutation sickness there were hints of in spiderman 2? Hints, such as ie peter losing his powers. I wonder if sam rami or stan lee might include this in spiderman 3. I like that they cast venom but sandman? I think carnage would have been better. but I think it will interesting none the less. just my two cent and speculations, schunn99

  92. Venom's Dad by Rai · · Score: 1

    Red: "How could you let that spider-punk beat you? Super villian, heh...super dumbass!"

  93. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but we're thinking of the animated series, right? not the one that was on mtv for a while but the earlier one. i guess it was a lot different from the comic than i had thought it was, i never read the comic. also venom, when he separated from peter parker, joined with that jock guy or something and got all beefed up. how can the guy from that 70's show play him?

  94. But What About Bruce Campbell? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Campbell's been assuring people for quite sometime he was going to be in Spiderman 3 "annoying spiderman" in some unspecified manner. How does that fit in with this?

  95. Spiderman vs. Seabiscuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd pay to see that.

  96. Dung Beetle! by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Imagine what Peter Parkers's super powers would have been if he were bitten by a radioactive dungbeetle! - "Oh no! He's rolling a giant turd ball at me!!!"

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  97. K.'s big mouth by xant · · Score: 1

    Boy, she has a little trouble keeping her mouth shut, doesn't she? Course, she was wrong about that one, maybe she's wrong about this one too...

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  98. No wayyy. by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    I don't remember seeing spiderman reading slashdot in the movie at all.

  99. Grrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked my Venom: Well built- Gracefull, anti-hero-hero. Why not a Honkong Kung Fu action actor Hero be Venom? Chow-Yun-Fat or a number of others? (Mabie Jackie Chan but he'd have to have a dub teem) Or is it more that they want someone with a british/american accent as Venom? (LOL Morgan Fishborn-Actuall has a strong Kung Fu background for the grace and has a wicked sense of humour)

  100. Venom height /weight stats by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Venom is supposed to be 6'3"(1.91M) and 260(125 kg) lbs - built like a big American football fullback, or the Rock (WWF pro wrestler). Topher Grace is 5'11"(1.80m) and maybe 165lbs(75 kg) - he's built like.........a skinny actor.
    Clearly, a judicious use of foam, muscle padding will needed. Clearly, another actor should have been picked to play Venom with any justice.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  101. BEST COMIC STORY EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Secret Wars (in which Spider-Man received the black costume) and Secret Wars 2 (in which a suddenly individualized God comes to Earth), are the best comic stories I can remember. Definitely worth a read.

    -joshua

  102. Re:No Kingpin?! by schon · · Score: 1

    OK, Daredevil is the only thing I've seen Colin Ferrell in, and I gotta say - WTF!??!

    I thought he was supposed to be some A-list actor.. is he really that bad an actor, or was he doing a Jeremy-Irons-D&D "I've decided I hate this movie, so I'm gonna be *SO* bad that the studio will can it and burn the negatives?"

    He was so godawful it's beyond description. When I watched him, all I could think of was wanting to engage in something less painful, like sticking a glass rod in my urethra and smashing it with a hammer.

    Did he feel sorry for Shane Brolly's performance in Underworld, and decide that he'd do something that made that idiot look like Sir Lawrence Olivier?

    I'd like to know if he's that bad in everything, or if Daredevil was something special, but I can't bring myself to watch something else he's in.

  103. The other way around? by Mark+from+Ark · · Score: 1
    "We have really great people though as the villains in this film, Thomas Haden Church and Topher Grace -- Venom and Sandman," said Dunst, who plays Mary Jane Watson in the Spidey films. "Maybe I wasn't supposed to say that," she added before reversing her claim. "It's the other way around. You're right," she conceded to a journalist.


    What, Venom and Sandman are playing Thomans Haden Church and Topher Grace? Now that I would pay to see.