Slashdot Mirror


New 'Mighty Mouse' Formula Found

mystyc writes to tell us that scientists at Johns Hopkins have improved upon their original "mighty mice" discovery. Teamed with the biotech firm MetaMorphix and pharmaceutical company Wyeth, they have found a new agent that interacts with the muscle-limiting protein myostatin that was able to trigger a 60% increase in muscle size after just two weekly injections.

200 comments

  1. Gotta love the scroll wheel. by PopeOptimusPrime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please move this to the Apple section :P

    1. Re:Gotta love the scroll wheel. by WindFish · · Score: 1

      A new Mighty Mouse formula? Could this be a third button?

    2. Re:Gotta love the scroll wheel. by bach37 · · Score: 0

      New 'Mighty Mouse' Formula Found

      Yes, but is it wireless?

    3. Re:Gotta love the scroll wheel. by solios · · Score: 1, Funny

      More importantly, does it run linux?

    4. Re:Gotta love the scroll wheel. by phatmonkey · · Score: 1

      Prepare for an Apple lawsuit...

    5. Re:Gotta love the scroll wheel. by Poltras · · Score: 1

      As long as it can make coffee, I don't care what it runs.

    6. Re:Gotta love the scroll wheel. by scbysnx · · Score: 1

      thats what I was hoping for!

  2. I dunno ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    think I'll wait 'til they work the bugs out before I go for my injections.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:I dunno ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is getting absurd. How much more can we do to these mice?

      Who is really going to inherit the earth? ... Probably ageless, super intelligent, beefy mice who breathe fire and raid your checking account.

    2. Re:I dunno ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought all geeks took steroids anyways. How else would they be able to lift their 100 kg mercury/water cooled cases? It's not like they have much use for their testes anyways. And the increased acne problem: well, it's all relative.

    3. Re:I dunno ... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Funny

      We've been helping them along for years, through our use of baited traps that serve only to provide pressure for mice to evolve increased intelligence and manual dexterity in order to remove the cheese without springing the trap. I'd say it's only a matter of time before they discover fire and split the atom.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  3. Mighty Mouse Theme by DiGG3r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here I Come to Save the Day!!

    1. Re:Mighty Mouse Theme by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Mr. Mouse,

      I am writing in regards to your inquiry about compensation for your recent affliction of horrible cancers. I am afraid we must reject any request for compensation. If you will refer back to the release you signed before submitting to our experiments, you will find that you stated that you understood all the risks and possible side effects of the injection and would not hold Johns Hopkins responsible for any adverse effects. In summary, I am sorry about your sickness; and I hope you can see that while this injection will eventually bring about your untimely death, you were able to dispense some mouse justice prior to your illness.

      Sincerely yours,

      G. Figley Whitesides
      Attorney at Law

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  4. Investigation... by daddyrief · · Score: 4, Funny

    Congress better look into this. If baseball players can't do this, mice shouldn't be able to either.

    --
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Investigation... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I predict a new player for the Los Angeles Angels of Annahiem will be playing soon. The helmet will have trouble fitting over his big black round ears.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Investigation... by Quiky · · Score: 2, Funny

      They said MIGHTY, not MICKEY.

    3. Re:Investigation... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Hey, but that doesn't mean Mickey can't become another Mantle.

      And what about Speedy, he should be able to take advantage of this drug too right?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  5. Mighty Mouse Formula = by damned_mediocrity · · Score: 1

    it has two buttons.

  6. All I can say is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    %Take me out to the ball game%

  7. MLB by whoop · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wonder how many baseball players read slashdot?

    1. Re:MLB by IdleTime · · Score: 4, Funny

      They can read???

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    2. Re:MLB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many baseball players can read.

    3. Re:MLB by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if the governor of California reads slashdot.

      And then there's all the spam - "Proven formula. mix this new M1GHT7 M0U53 formula with V14GR4 and really amaze her! 60% larger."

    4. Re:MLB by Hey+Pope+Felcher+.+. · · Score: 3, Funny

      . . . I am a baseball player and I take persenal ofense at this slur on us. just cause we can run and not fall other and dont wear glas's does not meen we dont have the intelligense to read and learn and become an actif member of the geek crowd.[br][br]Your just another hater. keep reading them books and see how many women you can get buzy with.

    5. Re:MLB by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      Can't resist - I hope none ! Or we will see even more fat ( and slow ) players scratching their other enlarged organs on the field. No - I'm not a baseball fan, not even in sports, but I like actions if it is the right kind like tactical skills, speed, even strength and endurance. Scratching your body parts and spitting are not my favorites, different people, different tastes maybe?

    6. Re:MLB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL DUMB JOCKS LOLOLOL

    7. Re:MLB by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      The coach can read and write The pitcher can read or write The batsmen knows someone who can read or write

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    8. Re:MLB by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm a bass player you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:MLB by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Please note that sarcasm will often be completely missed on slashdot. Note to slashdotters: parent was a joke.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  8. new market? by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So will this only be used for already sick people, or are we going to have to test for it in sports in the next decade?

    --
    Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
    1. Re:new market? by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 2, Funny

      i was asking a serious question :\ why did this get modded funny?

      --
      Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
    2. Re:new market? by Gibsnag · · Score: 1

      There was a bit in New Scientist saying that tests for this as well as gene therapy are already in development.

      If the drug is 'safe' then I don't see any reason for it not to be available, under whatever regulation (if any) steroids have.

    3. Re:new market? by Ubaid · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news:

      Johns Hopkins Wrestling Team wins national championships.

    4. Re:new market? by ranton · · Score: 1

      I absolutely cannot wait until your average person can use products like this. I spend between 10 and 20 hours a week in the gym (depending on work schedule), and I would love to have that reduced. I even enjoy what I do in the gym for the most part. But being able to spend less time in the gym lifting and more time just playing sports would be great. I dont think its a problem at all that regular people will finally have this.

      Someday people will remember the days when humans spent time lifting weights just like we now remember when people rode horses to work.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    5. Re:new market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But being able to spend less time in the gym lifting and more time just playing sports would be great. You're free! You're able! Go play sports! You can choose to play and not lift if it suits you!

    6. Re:new market? by ranton · · Score: 1

      If you honestly think that you can go out and play sports without conditioning your body then you must never have been good at any sports after maybe the grade school level.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  9. What happened to the heart? by BerntB · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Increased heart size is dangerous, right? This increase all muscles, so...

    What are the effects on the heart?

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    1. Re:What happened to the heart? by jzeejunk · · Score: 0, Redundant

      u r being too paranoid. why can't think of the effects on your penis. But then there's no use of it being a slashdotter, oh well...

      --
      sarchasm
    2. Re:What happened to the heart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello my name is Dr. Greenthumb
      I'm from the pack, no need for rehab
      in my clost, the weed is dryied out
      get lo0cked up, and they clos up my shop
      that's why they call me Dr. Greenthumb
      come one come all come see how it's done
      bug you never know wat be the outcome
      the weed is growing mlike my erecrion
      hello my name is DR. Greenshubm
      act likce the doctore where I"m from
      hello my name is dr. greenthumb
      act like the coutn from where I'm from
      we need more oxygen, we need mroe c02
      dr. die
      dr
      my moms' alwasy asking why I'm lighting up the block
      I wanna go to bed caus I'm getting braind dead
      mr mr l. I got a pound in my trunk
      yo, check it out, I'm a doit like htis
      one two mic checkda, hey, can I get a second?
      oh yeah, wehre was I? nigga's doing 117 in a hyundai
      and we's fcucked up
      riggity tiggity tock
      my moms' always asking why I'm fucked up
      yo, I"m fucked up, and yo, i want everyone to know I'm fucked up
      H2O #1 MCCCCCCCCCCc
      now check this,
      last night I broke my fist, from punching this bitch I mis-twisted my fist
      left side is right side cause outside I'm drinking
      but not me see, see bithc I grow my onw
      I got plants, plants ad mroe plants
      my name is H and I ain't no columbian
      soemtiems you smell the ari round no pollution
      does a goats eats can cause they fucked?
      caus I'm herculaes of the seven seas
      and I'm fucked up
      I'm fucked up, and missed ALOT of lyurics but bonus points to anyne who can identify the two songs I'm writng the lyrics to as I'm fucked up.,... come on poepl, I know ONE of youi must know BOTH of these songs

    3. Re:What happened to the heart? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Not to say this isn't bad for the heart (how the fuck would I know?), but the problem with the oversized heart isn't really its being oversized... but rather that the chambers of the heart get too small.

    4. Re:What happened to the heart? by zbyte64 · · Score: 1

      Aye, I know in some athletes they have a problem with one of the chamber wall muscles getting to bit which decreases the size of the chamber. The only treatment I know for this is where they do a "controlled" heart attack. Basically they inject some alchohol in the muscle tissues and the whole process ends up getting rid of excess muscle tissue.
      But hey, I'm sure enlarged heart muscles are the least of concern with some people who really have next to no muscle mass...

    5. Re:What happened to the heart? by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Funny

      but.. but... it worked for the Grinch!

    6. Re:What happened to the heart? by inputsprocket · · Score: 3, Informative

      It only affects striated muscle. Heart muscle is smooth and so is unaffected.

    7. Re:What happened to the heart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. The problem with having an increased heart (as happens in chronic high blood pressure) is not that the chambers of the heart get too small but rather in providing the blood supply necessary to feed the increased muscle mass. Most of the heart works by getting nutrients from diffusion of 02 and such through the cells themselves. Put those cells too far away from each other and you get problems. ie, ischemia. ie, heart attack.

    8. Re:What happened to the heart? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      In rugby players, the muscle growth dangerously increases pressure inside the skull...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    9. Re:What happened to the heart? by aychamo · · Score: 1

      An oversized heart is diagnostic of problems elsewhere in the body. A big heart itself isn't bad, it's that the heart has to increase in size (pumping harder) because of poor arterial flow.

    10. Re:What happened to the heart? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      It only affects striated muscle. Heart muscle is smooth and so is unaffected.

      This I remember from 7th grade biology: Digestive tract is smooth; Skeletal musculature is striated; Cardiac muscle is its own kind.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    11. Re:What happened to the heart? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      your penis is a gland, not a muscle.

    12. Re:What happened to the heart? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      The penis, contrary to popular belief, is not actually a muscle. It's (to put it dead simply) a partitioned blood balloon.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    13. Re:What happened to the heart? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      And where'd you see that?

      Geez, if you're going to mention outside info, cite the outside sources.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    14. Re:What happened to the heart? by inputsprocket · · Score: 1

      The published work is here, which explains that the gene affected is myostatin.

      Myostatin, aka GDF-8, is only expressed in skeletal muscle and not cardiac or smooth muscle: "There are several TGFb s subtypes which are based on their related structure. One such member is called growth and differentiation factors (GDF) and specifically regulates growth and differentiation. GDF-8, also called myostatin, is the skeletal muscle protein associated with the double muscling in mice and cattle."

    15. Re:What happened to the heart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forget...is the tongue striated or smooth muscle? If it's striated, we don't need to worry about baseball players abusing this...we need to worry about lesbians abusing this!

      Just wait...when this goes to market, the pharma company is going to sponsor the Howard Stern show.

    16. Re:What happened to the heart? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the article said the injected agent also made the "mighty" mice without myostatin grow 24% larger muscles.

      So it's likely that the injected agent isn't just affecting the myostatin stuff.

      --
    17. Re:What happened to the heart? by inputsprocket · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, and to delve a bit into the science, the receptor they were looking at, ACVR has an orthologue, ACVR2. Mice lacking ACVR (Acvr-/-) OR mice lacking ACRV2 (Acvr2-/-) both had larger muscles. However, Acvr-/-; Acvr2-/- double homozygous knockouts are not viable, so it is probable that both receptors regulate muscle growth.

      I didn't read the scientific article fully, but it's probably why it's only in PNAS and not Nature or Science.

    18. Re:What happened to the heart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, a balloon? Man, and all that stretching ain't helping squat.

      For some reason though, I believe the parent is speaking of the effect on the testicles of heavy steriod users.

  10. NFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barry Bonds is not as big as Dante Culpepper.

    Hell, Mark McGwire isn't as big as Dante Culpepper.

  11. Give some to the depressed hamsters? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Funny
    Wait, let me patent that idea, first.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:Give some to the depressed hamsters? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2, Funny

      But how would that affect their ability to float? If they become depressed again won't they drown.

      --Neth

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  12. Keeping Score by Nerdposeur · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, for the obligatory recap, we're looking forward to: Mice that are really strong, don't age (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/ 18/2133229&tid=214&tid=14), can regrow damaged limbs (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/ 01/0035245&tid=99&tid=14), and have no fear (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/ 18/0644240&tid=191&tid=14).

    I, for one, am investing in explosive mousetraps.

    1. Re:Keeping Score by ViX44 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They regenerate, and you want to blow them into pieces? Cut up some starfish while you're at it.

    2. Re:Keeping Score by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

      and the rodents are organising in attack squadrons.

      We're doomed!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Keeping Score by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't forget about piloting millitary airplanes. Screw better mousetraps -- I need a anti-rat missiles.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:Keeping Score by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Me thinks it would be smarter to ally oneself with the mice population - they'd soon circumvent mankind's puny new mousetraps.....

    5. Re:Keeping Score by bsartist · · Score: 1

      That's Mister Algernon to you, bub.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    6. Re:Keeping Score by gijoel · · Score: 1

      And if they get adamantine skeletons, then we are most assuredly f**ked!!!!

  13. captain america by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    is this the beginning of Super Soldier Serum?

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:captain america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i, for one, welcome our new mouse super solier overlords

  14. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Score:1, Rodentant

  15. Re:I, for one... by jzeejunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Talking of developing it for humans, a similar story was reported earlier on slashdot - http://science.slashdot.org/science/04/06/24/12342 50.shtml?tid=134&tid=191
    It is a very good case to study effects of no myostatin on humans.

    --
    sarchasm
  16. Sounds to me Like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO this sounds exactly like farcry...

  17. Gotta hate that crappy mouse. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wish they would come up with a formula for fixing that POS right click ( which occasionally reads as a left click...errhh), and those lame squeeze buttons that defy ergonomics.

    One of the worse mice I've EVER used... second only to the Apple hockey puck.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Gotta hate that crappy mouse. by Trillan · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I used one for a few weeks. At first, I had a lot of problems with left vs. right click. I eventually found out it depended on how I held it. I tried to use it as a two finger mouse, I ran into this problem. If I used it as a one or three finger mouse, I never had any problem.

      In the end, the only thing I REALLY liked about it -- the scroll nub -- stopped working properly so back it went.

      The squeeze buttons were incredibly lame. I bet the mighty mice wouldn't be able to do that click at all.

    2. Re:Gotta hate that crappy mouse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quite right. If you think it works bad on a mac, put it on a usb kvm switch and run it on a windows box too. I have this setup at work and its a real pain in the ass. As others have said, right click does not work properly. The scroll "wheel" does not work correctly on the kvm switch either. Its possible the kvm switch is to blame since it emulates a mouse attached at all times. (its an iogear 4port kvm)

      Before anyone asks why i'd do that, my boss only bought me 1 monitor and i have to use 3 macs and one POS dell everyday.

      I did hook up the mighty mouse directly to the g5 i have at work. It seems very accurate, similar to the apple pro mouse vs any other usb laser mouse about 5 years ago. The scroll "wheel" sucks bad. After using microsoft and logitech mice for years, I can't stand it. Its hard to keep it scrolling horizontally only which makes it useless in web browser windows or photoshop. Its also quite easy to push too hard and click which brings up dashboard by default as i recall. The side buttons just don't work right.

      My recommendation is to buy a microsoft laser mouse for 8 dollars on clearance at target instead of the 44 dollars or more on the mighty mouse from apple. The only thing mighty is the price.

  18. I for one, by Philomathie · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new fearless, super strong, immortal mice overlords.

  19. Abstract / free full paper link by Frangible · · Score: 5, Informative
    ABSTRACT: Myostatin is a secreted protein that normally functions as a negative regulator of muscle growth. Agents capable of blocking the myostatin signaling pathway could have important applications for treating human muscle degenerative diseases as well as for enhancing livestock production. Here we describe a potent myostatin inhibitor, a soluble form of the activin type IIB receptor (ACVR2B), which can cause dramatic increases in muscle mass (up to 60% in 2 weeks) when injected into wild-type mice. Furthermore, we show that the effect of the soluble receptor is attenuated but not eliminated in Mstn(-/-) mice, suggesting that at least one other ligand in addition to myostatin normally functions to limit muscle growth. Finally, we provide genetic evidence that these ligands signal through both activin type II receptors, ACVR2 and ACVR2B, to regulate muscle growth in vivo.

    Full journal article (PDF)

    1. Re:Abstract / free full paper link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pnas.org? nice try buddy, but i'm not clicking.

    2. Re:Abstract / free full paper link by narcc · · Score: 1

      Ignore the AC. I clicked the link and it is safe. Not only is it save, it has exactly what the grandparent said it has.

  20. Athletes... nature's willing guinea pigs. by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are we going to have to test for it in sports in the next decade?

    Decade? I give it months.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Athletes... nature's willing guinea pigs. by chemisus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      months?

      nah, id give it... how long did the article say the forumla takes? 2 weeks?

      just take a picture of baseball players now, and compare it in 2 weeks. im sure a 66% increase in muscles would be quite noticable.

    2. Re:Athletes... nature's willing guinea pigs. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spammers will be updating their "mighty muscle" emails within days!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Athletes... nature's willing guinea pigs. by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

      ....and it'll only be a matter of days before John McCain is standing at the door of major league baseball banging his shoe on the door to demand entry so he can investigate personally the stench of corruption these mighty-mice drugs have caused in our holy sport of baseball...

      --
      "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
    4. Re:Athletes... nature's willing guinea pigs. by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      The question is whether or not the muscle growth consumes fat tissue. That would be necessary for many sports players to take it seriously.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    5. Re:Athletes... nature's willing guinea pigs. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I wanted to wish you a very happy holiday season. I know it's early, but I didn't want to wait, lest I forget. No, that's not quite right, as I could never forget a guy as swell as you.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  21. Your intermediate school just called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want their joke back.

  22. normal people by rayde · · Score: 5, Interesting
    so my question is this... if something like this is proven to be safe in humans, allowing large increases in muscle growth, will it ever be available to the public? if not... why not?

    Steroids have long been banned in sports because they can have catastrauphic side-effects, and pro atheletes are often seen as role models. however, if a product came out that could dramatically strengthen humans, without nasty side-effects, for what reason shouldn't the average person be able to go out and in two weeks have significantly larger muscles? should it be regulated? and if so, why?

    there are ethical implications here... the haves vs. the have-nots... those who can afford to increase their muscle mass using the products would perhaps become a superior segment of the human race. imagine a scenario where western countries and their super-citizens gain a distinct physical advantage over the less wealthy countries.

    yet think of the productivity gains that would be possible in manufacturing, construction, or other physically intensive occupations. strengthening your workers could bring huge advantages.

    it's a very interesting issue, i'm sure one that we'll see popping up again in the future.

    1. Re:normal people by TheTerrorized · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AFAIK, the FDA does not approve drugs that improve regular people, just drugs that can fix problems already there. Many college students take ritalin to allow them to focus with low side-effects but they still cannot get it without a prescription.

    2. Re:normal people by Cirvam · · Score: 1

      I think the reason most steroids are banned in sports are because it offers an unfair competitive edge, i.e. what if you couldn't take steroids you wouldn't have a chance in the world then. But if this is a natraul substance I have to wonder how they can detect it, much like I don't think they can detect blood doping.

    3. Re:normal people by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      those who can afford to increase their muscle mass using the products would perhaps become a superior segment of the human race.

      What the hell are you babbling about. I don't see the "Body Builder Party" coming into power in any country.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:normal people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ritalin is considered to have a high potential for abuse and addiction, so perhaps it isn't the best example.

    5. Re:normal people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arnold Schwartzenager? Jessie Ventura? For God's sake, Americans were dumb enough to re-elect Bush; there's no telling who they'll put in power next

    6. Re:normal people by mangamuscle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You need to recheck again your facts. The reason steroids are banned is not because they have side effects, ask your doctor and he will tell you that all medicines (including) drugs have side effects. So why steroids in particular are illegal and (i.e.) viagra is not? 1) The soviets block was using it and winning medals, so it was easier to call it immoral and unfair using steroids. 2) Nixon started the war on drugs, adding steroids to the list was the next natural thing to do, nowadays 'roids are a multi-million dollar a year industry. 3) For a fascist goverment it is better to have fat citizens, athletic citizens have the scary custom of flexing their political muscles against the goverment.

    7. Re:normal people by compwiz312 · · Score: 1
      yet think of the productivity gains that would be possible in manufacturing, construction, or other physically intensive occupations. strengthening your workers could bring huge advantages.

      The question is how long before various companies would require the use of this product in their workers...

      It seems the only way to prevent a scenasrio like this would be to have it as limited use...

    8. Re:normal people by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Tell you what, you can have your super-muscles and I'll keep my .357 Magnum. Can your "superior" hominid dodge a bullet?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    9. Re:normal people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if my super muscles make me a little faster on the trigger.

    10. Re:normal people by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      What the hell are you babbling about. I don't see the "Body Builder Party" coming into power in any country.

      -Insert joke about governor of california here-

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    11. Re:normal people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ritalin is a treatment for a non-existant disease. ADD was made up as an excuse to drug our children because that is easier than trying to challenge them in school. I have a simple test for ADD. Take the child and put them in front of a playstation and tell them they can play as long as they want. If they truly had ADD they would get bored fairly soon and stop playing. The reality is that kid could probably play for days without stopping.

    12. Re:normal people by Helish · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting one thing, testosteron a natural substance which makes men what men are is the biggest steroid out there and it is the safest to use.

    13. Re:normal people by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Many college students take ritalin to allow them to focus with low side-effects but they still cannot get it without a prescription.

      You mean they can't legally get it without a prescription. I assure you that many of them still get it, prescription or not.

    14. Re:normal people by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      "Safe", of course being relative...
      Or, as Arthur Dent said best, "This must be some new definition of 'safe' that I am unfamiliar with"

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    15. Re:normal people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tell you what, you can have your super-muscles and I'll keep my .357 Magnum. Can your "superior" hominid dodge a bullet?


      Ah the retort of a wuss.

      How about I put you and Mike Tyson in an elevator. You can even have your popgun (anything under a .40 is for pussies anyway) and given sufficient motivation to kill you (Mike, you kill this geek bare handed and we'll give you 40 mil) my money goes on Mike. First shot lethality (unless you're a SEAL or SWAT operator trained to deal with adrenaline dump properly) is damned near a myth in most situations. The kind of strength increases hypothesized would give the average thug the ability to break your neck without a problem.
    16. Re:normal people by yabos · · Score: 1

      Taking testosterone, usually the common test-E reduces your own testosterone production while you're taking it so it does still have bad side effects. You have to take post cycle drugs to try and kick start your balls again after you stop taking it. Test-E is usually considered the best first starter anabolic though. It also increases your hair loss if you are genetically prone to male pattern baldness.

    17. Re:normal people by winwar · · Score: 1

      "You need to recheck again your facts."

      The first rule of thumb is to check your own facts before you write such a statement.

      Steroids are NOT illegal. Banned in certain sports and may not be legally available over the counter. But in the US they are LEGAL to presribe.

    18. Re:normal people by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1
      there are ethical implications here... the haves vs. the have-nots... those who can afford to increase their muscle mass using the products would perhaps become a superior segment of the human race. imagine a scenario where western countries and their super-citizens gain a distinct physical advantage over the less wealthy countries

      We don't even need to wait that long for the super muscle enhancer to come. Heightism is in fact a closely related present day problem, esp. for a community which is rapidly developing (like big city in developing country with sizable migrant population). You will find that height is quite strongly correlated to the nutrient intake of a particular person. The taller ones are much more likely to be brought up in city by middle class family, while the shorter one tend to be from the rural/ brought up by uneducated relative/ suffer from malnutrition etc at some stage during growth... Without a collective social conscious that people are equal and a fierce competitive environment, tacit discrimination can become the norm.
    19. Re:normal people by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 1

      How exactly would bigger muscles aid you in setting up a web server, doing your accounts, designing an ad campaign, selling real estate, operating industrial robots or any job at all that pays more than minimum wage?
      We didn't need Superman to build the Empire State Building. That's what we have machines for. These days, muscles are mainly used for beating up wives and drinking buddies. Read a few books and exercise your brain tissue, if you want to get anywhere in life.

    20. Re:normal people by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Except you're confusing active participation with passive observation. Further, inattention does not nessecarily involve wandering off. A wandering mind is much more difficult to spot, especially in circumstances where a lack of response is typical, such as watching TV, reading, listening to a lecture, etc. Some people have difficulty paying attention to things, even when they deliberately try to focus on the subject, even when they are interested in the subject. Disinterest obviously exacerbates the problem.

    21. Re:normal people by cfuse · · Score: 1
      so my question is this... if something like this is proven to be safe in humans, allowing large increases in muscle growth, will it ever be available to the public? if not... why not?

      Steroids have long been banned in sports because they can have catastrauphic side-effects, and pro atheletes are often seen as role models. however, if a product came out that could dramatically strengthen humans, without nasty side-effects, for what reason shouldn't the average person be able to go out and in two weeks have significantly larger muscles? should it be regulated? and if so, why?

      And yet we can freely smoke and drink. Don't expect the drug laws to make sense any time soon.

      Whether legal recreational use ever happens or not, isn't really that important IMO - I'd rather see this and other similar discoveries used to combat muscle wasting in AIDS.

      there are ethical implications here... the haves vs. the have-nots... those who can afford to increase their muscle mass using the products would perhaps become a superior segment of the human race. imagine a scenario where western countries and their super-citizens gain a distinct physical advantage over the less wealthy countries.

      Um, the distinct advantage the west has over the third world is that we can afford to eat. I don't think that they'll be any worse off because we get buff.

    22. Re:normal people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For a fascist goverment it is better to have fat citizens, athletic citizens have the scary custom of flexing their political muscles against the goverment.

      Pfft. Steroids + Exercise = Athletic. Steroids + No Exercise = Fatter than before. Steroids aren't some magic wand that makes you build muscle as you sit in front of the TV and munch on cheesy poofs.

    23. Re:normal people by ahkbarr · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty ridiculous and prejudiced remark. Why would brains and muscles have to be mutually exclusive? I myself have an above average IQ, and I make my living off of it. Coincidentally, I also weigh 201 lbs and am working towards 10% body fat. Your comment shows you think the pursuit of muscle has no meaning. Think about how dumb that is the next time you spend hours gaming. The things that are valued for aesthetics have value even if only for that. Having said that, limiting myostatin has benefits _far_ beyond aesthetics.

      --
      Compared to war, all other forms of human endeavor shrink to insignificance. God, how I love it. - Gen. George Patton
    24. Re:normal people by Morgalyn · · Score: 1

      Um, the distinct advantage the west has over the third world is that we can afford to eat. I don't think that they'll be any worse off because we get buff.

      THANK YOU, I'm glad someone made this point before I came through. For, well, centuries now, one of the major 'advantages' western culture (and some eastern cultures!) have had over their less-fortunate third world neighbors has been adequate nutrition. Although I don't have any handy facts, I'll postulate that most cases of third world tech withstanding organized conquering efforts of colonialism were probably in areas where the natives ate well. When you aren't eating well, its really hard to do much of anything.

      --
      You say you got a real solution
      Well, you know
      We'd all love to see the plan
      (The Beatles)
  23. Great Stocking Stuffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now about that "love muscle"...

  24. Whoa by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

    I wonder how Fatmouse feels about this? This technology must be kept out of the paws of Baron Von Bloatenkat!

  25. No miracle pill here by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well the number one through three issues I can think of is whether or not it increases tendon and ligament strength. I'm pretty sure if all it does is block myostatin that it doesn't do either. If not, then you run the risk of having muscles way too strong for your joints.

    Of course you run this same risk if you leap right into weight lifting with low-rep, heavy-weight work without spending the time to strengthen these joints with high-rep, low-weight work first.

    On the other hand, since this almost certainly does nothing for neuromuscular response, you'll also end up with a lot of large but mostly useless muscle mass that's untappable for you.

    In other words, don't expect this to substitute for working out for anyone who's not trying to stave off the decay of their existing muscles.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:No miracle pill here by Fei_Id · · Score: 1

      Well the strength isnt going to increase without some activity, but one would presume that an average individual would at least have been working out in the gym for several years before even contemplating it.

      Ligaments grow in response to strength and size gains. If your average, weak, slashdotter geek; who weighs 120lbs, has 9 inch biceps and cant bench or squat 95lbs used the stuff; yeah they would overload their system pretty quickly and lead to some pretty bad injuries.

      Rotator Cuff injuries come to mind. Many real gym-buffs have stretch marks from their youth when they began working out; especially under the Deltoids. Usually occurs right above the armpit; where the pectoralis major attaches to the upper arm bone. The shoulder-area (especially front delt and pecs) are usually one of the quickest to grow when first starting out; and I'd bet the muscle would grow large (relatively) quite quickly.

      Of course, to counter these arguments... there are several bodybuilders who have documented (some presumed) genetic mutations to where they have a much lower amount of Myostatin in their system than the average mesomorph somatype. Frank Zane comes to mind... the guy could grow just by looking at weight equipment.

      I agree with your assessment though. Most average Americans would use it, and not workout, and not eat right and they'd gain a bunch of extra muscle mass; for which they'd have to eat more for, and would be overloaded to instantly have to carry it all around.

    2. Re:No miracle pill here by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who says people want to increase muscle mass in order to be strong? I suspect a lot of guys would like to have more muscle mass just because they think it would look good.

    3. Re:No miracle pill here by Helish · · Score: 1

      The power and size of the muscle in body builders has a lot more to do with the type of training. Slow controled movements in bodybuilding and fast explosive movments in power and weight lifting. Different training for different puposes.

    4. Re:No miracle pill here by TIMxPx · · Score: 1

      And to those people, I say "knock yourself out". It would be a dangerous thing thing to do, considering the ridiculous increased demand placed on the heart, not to mention the tripling of your food budget. But people have paid for steroid use with their lives, just to look better, so I wouldn't expect this to be much different.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world: That averages about 660,000,000 of each kind.
    5. Re:No miracle pill here by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      I'm in shape. Round is a shape. :P

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    6. Re:No miracle pill here by poolmeister · · Score: 1

      "Who says people want to increase muscle mass in order to be strong? I suspect a lot of guys would like to have more muscle mass just because they think it would look good"

      Let's not forget the most likely use of a drug like this would be to treat people suffering from a muscle wasting disease such as Muscular Dystrophy.

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    7. Re:No miracle pill here by cfuse · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, since this almost certainly does nothing for neuromuscular response, you'll also end up with a lot of large but mostly useless muscle mass that's untappable for you.

      Considering that an alarming amount of men in skimpy spandex outfits with 'world gym' printed on them exercise solely to get bigger, I don't think that this will be a problem.

  26. The End of Roadkill by dogwelder99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pretty soon, running over rodents on the street will just make them mad enough to chase you down and fight back. Better invest in a Hummer.

    1. Re:The End of Roadkill by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Better invest in a Hummer.

      Yeah.. nothing feels better after getting the crap kicked out of you. Oh wait, you meant the SUV...

  27. mod parent FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a joke guys. Wake up!

  28. The next Arnold Schwarzenegger by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the next Arnold Schwarzenegger-like "star" will start filming his first action blockbuster three weeks from the day human test trials of this discovery begins?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:The next Arnold Schwarzenegger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the number of candidates for governor elections will skyrocket!

  29. 3rd Leg by PokerAndroid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it work on that all important muscle....the 3rd leg?

    1. Re:3rd Leg by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Does it work on that all important muscle....the 3rd leg?

      You, Sir, belong in the spam business.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Forget mice, give me cows by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I, for one, hope that they can use this to great effect to feed us cow-eating folk. Mmm, ultra-large spare ribs.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Forget mice, give me cows by MarkTina · · Score: 1

      Would you be the slaughterhouse working brave enough to step into the enclosure of a supercow ? ;-)

    2. Re:Forget mice, give me cows by Mprx · · Score: 1

      For a preview of what this will look like, look at the breed of cattle with mutant myostatin gene, the Belgian Blue. They have enormous muscles, but they are not popular because the fetus cows grow too big for natural birth, so all of them have to be born by caesarean section. An injectable myostatin blocker avoids this problem, so I predict this will soon become very important in meat farming.

    3. Re:Forget mice, give me cows by nacturation · · Score: 1

      ... the fetus cows grow too big for natural birth, so all of them have to be born by caesarean section. An injectable myostatin blocker avoids this problem...

      Myostatin is what limits muscle growth, so if having smaller muscles avoids the birth problem you'd want to inject myostatin, not a blocker.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Forget mice, give me cows by Mprx · · Score: 1

      The point being that it's not genetic, so you can inject them after they are born and not inject the pregnant cows.

    5. Re:Forget mice, give me cows by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you mean injecting non-Belgian Blue cows after birth... makes sense now.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:Forget mice, give me cows by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Not if you inject the myostatin blocker into a normal cow, neatly avoiding the invitro problems with a myostatin-deficient breed.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    7. Re:Forget mice, give me cows by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Right, and what happens to people/stuff that eat the meat with the myostatin blocker in it? It may be fairly safe for cows (which aren't going to live long anyway), but humans?

      <rant>
      Nowadays too many countries and people are treating food as fuel.

      As long as it meets a certain official grade, it's food. Even if it involves dubious stuff like feeding chicken shit and feathers to cows. This apparently was stopped recently in the US because of BSE scares - turns out many chickens get fed bits of cows, so they were afraid that bits of "chicken feed" would end up being swept up along with the shit and feathers and being eaten by cows. Cool huh? Always taking care of the public...

      Ironic that so many of the US people are afraid of eating the "weird foods" in my country ;). And they go eat a burger instead (apparently there was one who only ate peanut butter the entire visit).

      With all of this stuff going, with "food" that gets processed, substituted etc, I'm wondering about all these extreme peanut allergies going around in the US/Canada. Is it due to media playing it up, or is it getting so common?

      Maybe kids in other countries are dying in numbers of peanut allergies and it doesn't get reported much?

      If not, perhaps it's all the weird stuff that goes on with commercial peanut butter. e.g. extract the peanut oil, replace it with "cheapest veg oil of the day", add various emulsifiers "cheapest of the day", blend, and serve to young child.

      I won't be surprised if it turns out that sort of thing confuses some immune systems.

      Recently they found that taking a gene from one species and inserting it into another didn't cause the target to necessarily produce the exact same stuff - something similar is made, but it was a bit more toxic than what the original species produced...

      Sure GM has uses, but I think one should wait for the amount of greed involved to reduce a bit first before one starts opening the floodgates.

      Just block it till most of the greedy people who are just in it for the money go look for something else to do.

      I say we can wait. Most (if not all) of the proposed GM "solutions", are just solutions looking for a problem. Many of those problems either can be solved easily and cheaply by other means, or GM actually doesn't deal with the problem (mass starvation is mostly due to bad politics, rather than insufficient food production).
      </rant>

      --
  32. I know it's funny... by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I know the title of this article is kind of funny, and there are a lot of funny posts on this thread, however; if you are interested in learning a little more about this, and wish to see a different perspective on the issue (such as practical appliactions, etc...) Check out the following link.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6065

    Seeing that the source for the main article is currently ./'d, you should have time to have a gander :-)

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
  33. lol, now sports players wont have to take steroids by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1
    In todays class, we're going to learn how to say "Steroids" or "Incredible Hulk", OK little kids?

    lol, now sports players wont have to take steroids...

  34. HS flashbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >: You gonna eat all that cheese? ...Pip...squeek









    //reassumes the fetal position

  35. Re:PHP: CREATED BY FAG JEWS, LOVED BY DIRTY NEGERO by coke_scp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This whole crazy nazi racism shit's starting to get annoying. It's increasing more and more over the last few weeks. Isn't there some mechanism that can be put in place to make it go away?

  36. It's Overdone, But... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our fearless, near-immortal, super-strong rodent overlords.

  37. but.... by jdumps · · Score: 1

    Most importantly, does it come a cream?

  38. Re:PHP: CREATED BY FAG JEWS, LOVED BY DIRTY NEGERO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This whole crazy nazi racism shit's starting to get annoying."

    Yeah, and just think how annoying it was to Jews living in Germany back in the 1930s.

  39. Wrong by Seoulstriker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Heart muscle is also striated. However, the cardiac myocytes are not multi-nucleated and the pattern is more zig-zaggy. Nevertheless, if the cardiac myocytes were not striated, the muscle just wouldn't have enough force to contract and propel blood through the chambers and the peripheral vasculature.

    I'm still waiting on the published research...

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! Next time I cut my finger, I'm going to take off work that day.

      I'm sure my boss will agree I should stay home when I explain that I'm hemorrhaging from my peripheral vasculature!

  40. Won't work! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Have you forgotten that mice can pilot airplanes, too? What we need, is transgenic cats! :P

  41. Re:PHP: CREATED BY FAG JEWS, LOVED BY DIRTY NEGERO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forced sterilization, preventing drinking durring pregnancy, learning to read, take your pick.....

  42. Don't be rediculous by noamsml · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that Batman it better.

  43. No Problemo? by imstanny · · Score: 1
    If you don't have myostatin, you'll have serious problems; Body builders are found to screte less of this, and are able to build muscle much more impressively than the average joe.

    Removing myostatin from the body may cause more profund effects like having an enlarged heart; I dont know if any of you recall this, but there was an article on a 'super baby', a child that has no mystatin production (both his parents were freakishly strong as well). He's about 4x as strong as children his size, but doctors warned that he may have serious problems with his heart also growing uncontrollably.

    1. Re:No Problemo? by dallasmsl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In response to your posting, bodybuilders have NOT been found to have less myostatin than non-weightlifters. Not ONE scientific report will back up your statement. In fact, in most bodybuilders, myostatin has been working just fine at keeping them from becoming absolutely huge. No bodybuilder just looks at weights and becomes muscular. Unlike these mice, bodybuilders train on a daily basis. These mice gained muscle mass (and muscle cells!) without any additional exercise! As for your inference that the child in Germany will have heart problems, the doctors do NOT know this. In fact, they do know that the parents don't have problems so their warning about the child is unfounded.

  44. Don't let . . . by snStarter · · Score: 1

    Barry Bonds find out.

    Oh, wait, too late. He's shooting up even as we speak.

    101 homers next year.

    Sigh

  45. Love Muscle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this effect the love muscle?

  46. I beg to differ by mangamuscle · · Score: 1

    About the "useless muscle mass", do you realize that muscle building in general (thru normal workout or induced by myostatin) does not increase the number of muscle cells in your organism? Now explain to me why should hypertrophied muscle cells would become suddenly unavailable to their respective nerve terminals.

    1. Re:I beg to differ by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      "Muscle geeks?"

      That...is a scary concept.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    2. Re:I beg to differ by Helish · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of us around

    3. Re:I beg to differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Muscle geeks?"

      That...is a scary concept.


      I see that you've never hung out on misc.fitness.weights.

      All hail the deadlift!
    4. Re:I beg to differ by yabos · · Score: 1

      I crush you with my monitor!

  47. Superficial vs practical by UnclePow2223 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aside from the obvious jokes that can be made of this news and the military applications of a super soldier or sports being taken to a new (and unnecesary level) it's stories like this that give some hope to families like mine that have a loved one diagnosed with muscular dystrophy. My nephew, only 2 years old, has already been diagnosed with this dibilitating disorder. People with MD usually don't live far past their 20s or 30s. So I for one am anxious to see what human testing would yeild and the side effects. But that doesn't mean I wouldn't laugh at some more superficial suggestions for its application....

    --
    org 0x100
    mov dx, SIG
    mov ah, 9
    int 0x21
    int 0x20
    SIG: db "UnclePow$"
    1. Re:Superficial vs practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, there already is a much merciful cure for that kind of disease: High-velocity intracranial lead injection. And the good news is that it's available OTC in the USA.

    2. Re:Superficial vs practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yes!

      My wife is currently permanently bed-ridden due to muscle wasting and chronic pain. In fact, I had to quit my job and become her full-time carer and we can't wait for this stuff to become available. In fact, she just called her specialsts to inquire if there are any clinical trials that she might qualify for.

  48. So when can I get my injections by Keropipi · · Score: 1

    forget old school steroids

  49. And it will be banned... by ThePuceGuardian · · Score: 1

    ... because of sports. Hooray.

  50. don't forget ... by mangamuscle · · Score: 1

    the other implication is that we might yet see Stephen Hawkins get rid of his wheelchair and attend conferences and speak with his own voice, wouldn't it be wonderful?

    1. Re:don't forget ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes i would verry much like to see him in good health and live like most of us do.
      then again if i were in his position i'd quit science in a heart beat to go out in the world and expirience things that i couldnt for such a long time.

      the world would lose one of it's greatest scientific minds.
      but i guess he does deserve it, even if i dont understand most of it :)

  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Note For Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The effects are naturally occuring - albeit in a very small population of humans. Usually we suppress muscle growth - probably because too much is hard on the circulatory system. Not only that, but you only need so much muscle to hunt and all that jazz to stay alive. When we were evolving, we probably got this gene so we didn't overproduce muscle and raise our energy costs.

    You may recall the german superbaby who was born with two defective copies of the inhibiting gene - he has twice the muscle mass and half the body fat of other kids his age - link:

    http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20040626-060 429-4116r.htm

  53. Don't forget to put an asterisk * by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    ...next to the mouse's name in the record book.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  54. The end of brawn above brains? by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine. You've spent most of your life working to perfect your body. You've suffered boredom, pain and injuries. For this, you get all the good girls, and the admiration of your peers. Then some pencil-neck geek injects himself with myostatin blocker, and in a month he's beating you at arm-wrestling. The dungeons and dragons club actually do look like steel-thewed barbarians, if barbarians had acne.

    Oh, the dilution of kudos! How the mighty are fallen...

  55. missing the obvious by Hallow · · Score: 1

    Everybody's missing the obvious here. Yes, body builders, steroids, baseball, side-effects, etc., but what I'm more interested in is.... how does it make them tase?

    Cows. Chicken (maybe). Buffalo. Not mouse.

    Tasty critters, now with 60% more meat! Yeah!

  56. Just a guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I'll bet doubling your muscle mass in two weeks time has a number of negative side effects. Cost won't be an issue. Some foreign nation, China perchance, will see this as a 'National Security' thing and walk all over the 'Intellectual Property' rights of anyone who discovers a super soldier serum, mass producing it cheaply and efficiently. And of course, it only works for half of the population. Women don't want huge muscles. They want weight loss and big tits in pill form. Insecure men will be the primary market, where sadly they'll take the serum hoping to become an adonis... just like ever one else. Men who are satisfied with the way they are will probably just have to carry .45's in order to drop the pricks if the new bulges go to their heads.

  57. Messin' with nature by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Give me all your damned cheese NOW, you scrawny human!"

  58. ahem, all the good girls, really. by mangamuscle · · Score: 1

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but the ugly truth is that most girls think profesional level boduilders are freaks of nature. If you are thinking bodybuilder = arnold, stallone or van damme then do a google check to do a visual actualization of how a bodybuilder looks nowadays.

    1. Re:ahem, all the good girls, really. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      And if that doesn't freak you out bad enough, one look at a female professional bodybuilder will.

  59. Effects Not Fully Known by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    So they know what it does now, but not in 50 years? HA! I'm not gonna touch it. Look like a body builder now, 20 years later my heart has my circulatory system running at 120/80... psi. Not gonna do much good when I try to shake my boss' hand and render it down to coal.

  60. Magic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So does it work if you inject it into your lower regions!! Sounds like the new Viagra!!

  61. "Enlarged" heart - depends... by jpellino · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ventricular Hypertrophy - in a sedentary person - is an indication of the (usually left) vetricle working too hard to overcome narrowed atreries, and increasing its mass for that reason only.

    Many athletes have "enlarged" hearts - simply because the heart is working harder for the right reasons. For years world class athletes were being denied decent health insurance rates, because a chest x-ray would show a larger than normal heart, and MDs knew of only one reason for it - the bad one. It was in large part Kenneth Cooper's study of aerobic exercises for the Air Force that started the large school of info on the actual effects of exercise on the cardiovascular system.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  62. Sounds like steroids by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    ... on steroids! :-)

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  63. A better moose trap by Belseth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, that explains why the mouse trap looks like a pretzel. Time to break out the bear traps and a wheel of cheese.

  64. Seriously by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a friend with two children doomed to die of muscular dystrophy, so I have to wonder if this might be a relevant breakthrough in that area...

  65. Jose by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    I went to see Jose Canseco speak. He can read, but he certainly can't write. Of course Jocks aren't the only people who easily find themselves in a nice career without working, but they are the most profound. Especially with the new trend of looking for foreigners before domestic players on the count of "potential" we are facing a real problem. These people suddenly have power and influence without any knowlege, which means they can mess things up without even trying. Of course increasing academic standards might help, while we are keeping high school kids from playing in the NFL we might as well start testing incoming athletes against stupidity (or any other sport for that matter).

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  66. Pinky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

  67. Normal by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
    Nature evolved the muscle inhibitor for a reason and that reason is probably your survivability goes down. For one, you would have to eat much more food. Not necessarily a good trait in the past when food could be scarce, but probably not a good one now because it is still an economic strain to suddenly have to spend 2 or 3 times the normal amount on food.

    Since your muscles are the one thing that are going to boost and in a really short period of time, you are going to put tremendous strain on other parts of your body (ligaments, tendons, and most of your organs) since they have to support all that muscle. There may be other things that we can not yet anticipate, but for sure if you put a person in this situation, you will suddenly discover any number of surprise problems that occur after 5 to 10 years of using this stuff.

    If a person wants to get bigger and stronger, they just have to train. I've seen some twiggy people totally change there bodies after 5 years of diligent effort, and they remained healthy and strong with no bizarre side effects and very few injuries. Pills are not a substitute for effort.

    1. Re:Normal by ahkbarr · · Score: 1

      Because neuromuscular response is not likely developed as fast as skeletal muscle, you likely have a chance to develop your tendons as you develop your ability to actually use those muscles.

      Not everyone has equal opportunity to get "big". If you're naturally small, you have virtually no chance of getting "big" naturally. You can only improve to a naturally limited ceiling. It's been shown that genetics have the largest role in your body type. Extreme ectomorph's cannot train to have big muscles, period. This discovery changes that completely.

      Now that I've said that, here's the other side. If you have 250 lbs of bodyweight, whether it's muscle or fat, your cardiovascular system is stressed with 250 lbs of body weight, period. You need to train your heart and lungs to be able to handle that or you'll die young like a football player. Also, long term research has to be done on increased dietary requirements and the impact on free radicals and the aging process.

      On the other side yet again is the inherent loss of body fat. Body fat has been beneficial to survival for relatively short lifespans because you have something to prevent starvation in lean times, but when you extend fatness over a long lifespan you almost guarantee diseases related to clogged arteries and a f*cked endocrine system.

      --
      Compared to war, all other forms of human endeavor shrink to insignificance. God, how I love it. - Gen. George Patton
    2. Re:Normal by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
      Not everyone has equal opportunity to get "big". If you're naturally small, you have virtually no chance of getting "big" naturally. You can only improve to a naturally limited ceiling. It's been shown that genetics have the largest role in your body type. Extreme ectomorph's cannot train to have big muscles, period. This discovery changes that completely.
      This is certainly true, but it gets to what I was saying. No matter who you are, unless you have a severe genetic disorder, several years of appropriate training will create greatly increased muscle mass and strength (relative to your body type). The ectomorph will certainly not have as high a ceiling for mass and strength as a mesomorph, in general, but relative to their baseline, they can make significant gains.

      The real problem that I was alluding to is that, if you are an ectomorph with a small frame, you are probably also genetically predisposed to have support systems geared to it. Your vascular system, endocrine system, and your heart.

      As you said, if you add on a tremendous amount of muscle and change the effective body type from ectomorph to endomorph, you are placing a huge load on other systems which have not evolved through millenia of genetics to support it. Thus several years of taking that crap will result in all kinds of unpredictable long-term problems probably including organ failure. Stuff will just wear out.

      Or just imagine tripling a person's muscle mass, but their lungs are contained in a small rib cage. They might walk around light headed all the time or nearly hyperventilate all the time just to fuel their quadriceps. If they really exerted themselves in a sprint, they might black out. While part of me thinks that is somewhat comical, another part of me thinks it is dead serious.

    3. Re:Normal by ahkbarr · · Score: 1
      The real problem that I was alluding to is that, if you are an ectomorph with a small frame, you are probably also genetically predisposed to have support systems geared to it. Your vascular system, endocrine system, and your heart.
      Your point is valid, but possibly overstated. Let's not forget we already have what amounts to case studies in people such as Frank Zane, and also in animals such as the Belgian Blue bull {who|that} have under expressed/faulty myostatin gene[s] already. To my knowledge neither have ill effects from their abnormality. Keep in mind, this trait of underexpressed myostatin genes isn't accompanied by traits for a super-charged cardio-vascular system. I'm not saying the concern is invalid, but I am saying there is some evidence that the body simply adapts to the trait.

      We continue to learn that our supportive systems are quite adaptive to changes in associated aspects of our physiology. It could very well be that myostatin has the secondary effect (simply because of reduced muscle mass) of reducing the capacity of supportive systems such as connective tissue, capilary growth, etc.
      --
      Compared to war, all other forms of human endeavor shrink to insignificance. God, how I love it. - Gen. George Patton
  68. You've missed a P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is spelled hampster with a p.
    Read it on /. yesterday so it must be true.

  69. What is it with mice and slashdot?? by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    We now have fearless mice, mice that are stronger, mice brain cells that are able to control plane simulators, and mice that we can remote control. What ever happened to the normal mice that my cats ate?? Im not saying it's a bad thing but it's odd how every month there is a mouse that is doing something new.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  70. Don't worry about it, GP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry about it, GP! You can likely plug him 6 or 8 times while he's distractd gnawing on your ears...

    -- AC

  71. Re:Brain... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    Gee, Brain, I don't know. What would your mother say about the peanut butter?

  72. In Soviet Russia.. by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

    In soviet Russia rodents eat you.

    .. COME ON! I need better Karma!

  73. Inzane by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
    I was not aware that Frank Zane had a myostatin abnormality, but looking at it from the evolutionary perspective, if my concern is an accurate one, then corresponding genes for cardiovascular and endocrine support would have to exist in those with myostatin errors because that combination of supplementary genes is the only thing that would prevent early death due to system failure.

    In other words, I think Frank Zane is a very different situation than selecting random individuals from the population that "want to get big" and giving them an effective myostatin deficiency without the corresponding evolutionary path that Frank Zane had to also receive the genetic changes necessary to balance it.

    It is all hypothetical anyway. Can just wait for it to hit the market and see if people die. Of course, I am being cavalier. What I mean is that our superb FDA will very thoroughly test the drug in limited clinical doses for extended periods of time and they will absolutely not compromise in any way whatsoever for financial gain that might be had by way of the amazingly lucrative sports industry.

    No, sir. Nothing to worry about there.