Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 6.06 Reviewed

Mark writes "This year has been a huge step forward for Desktop Linux users. First, Fedora Core 5 was released and featured the new Gnome 2.14. Then SUSE 10.1 showed us how well applications could be integrated to make a desktop look great. Now it was time for Ubuntu to release their latest version: 'Dapper Drake.'" Oh yeah, the inital review is good, too. Worth checking out for desktop Linux users.

351 comments

  1. kubuntu by LiMikeTnux · · Score: 0

    how long until kubuntu pops out with theirs?

    --
    yap
    1. Re:kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      -2 days :)

    2. Re:kubuntu by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      Did you look, it's on-line. Got it last night. It's nice.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    3. Re:kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Still voting democrat? You're STUCK on STUPID!

      Tactful, articulate, nuanced? Hmm, let me run this sig by my authorship identification program real quick... GOOD LORD! Who let George W back on the internets?
    4. Re:kubuntu by mashuren · · Score: 1

      Oops, sorry, I didn't mean to mod this OT... I'm new to this moderation stuff. (>)

      --
      An object at rest cannot be stopped.
  2. Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow...I made a simple change to my sources.list file and ran sudo apt-get dist-upgrade and 15 minutes later I went from Breezy to Dapper. No reboot required. Bravo to the Ubuntu team!

    1. Re:Painless Upgrade by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. Does anybody have any details on this operation? This sounds like something I'd like to do, but the review is slashdotted and I can't find any useful information on the Ubuntu site.

    2. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can this upgrade be done from a live CD version?
      In other words, if I have live CD V 5.1 Can I then do a hard disk installation / upgrade to the new Dapper version?
        If so ,please tell us how, this would make it even greater

    3. Re:Painless Upgrade by shreevatsa · · Score: 5, Informative

      The many (equivalent) ways to upgrade to Dapper ("Ubuntu 6.06") are detailed at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperUpgrades. This, of course, is assuming you're already running Breezy ("Ubuntu 5.10").

    4. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=87262 Oh and by the way, this is nothing new to debian based distros. They all work this well. Viva apt!

    5. Re:Painless Upgrade by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1

      Took all day on Friday (still wasn't finished when I left for the weekend (long 4-day weekend too!). Of course my computer at work is just a PIII 700 or 800 MHz with 256 MB RAM.

    6. Re:Painless Upgrade by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can first install the 5.10 to your hard disk, and then do the changes as above to get upto 6.06. Read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Installation for a more detailed description of everything. Some of those instructions mention Breezy (5.10) — it's only been two days since the new version came out, so those pages haven't been completely updated yet — but I expect most of them to work for the new Dapper too.

      BTW, the version numbers are actually release dates, so 5.10 (not 5.1, actually) is 2005 October, and 6.06 is 2006 June.

    7. Re:Painless Upgrade by HankB · · Score: 5, Informative
      sudo bash
      cp /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.just-to-be-safe
      vi /etc/apt/sources.list
      1,$s/breezy/dapper/g
      <esc> wq
      apt-get update
      apt-get dist-upgrade
      shutdown -r now


      During the dist-upgrade step you will probably have to answer some questions about using new config files vs. existing modified ones.

      You do need to reboot if you want the new kernel running. (2.6.15)

      Afterwards you might have to tweak some things like the wireless drivers or display drivers. I had to download the synaptics driver because the new one has bugs that manifest for 64 bit systems.

      But it really is that easy!

      -hank
    8. Re:Painless Upgrade by SeraphimX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did the same thing except when i did it and rebooted as instructed on the http://kubuntu.org/ site. My raid 5 couldn't be found and my Xwindows failed to load, oh and i was off the network. :(

      So then i figured i would try a fresh install, but as soon as i booted the live DVD, neither of my mice,Logitech mx700 and mx510 worked.

      So i had to reinstall Breezy 5.10

      Needless to say im slightly disapointed in Dapper Drake

    9. Re:Painless Upgrade by mkro · · Score: 5, Funny

      My grandmother's head exploded just after she finished typing the "vi /etc/apt/sources.list" part :(

      Will this be fixed in future versions of the tutorial?

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    10. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My raid 5 couldn't be found and my Xwindows failed to load, oh and i was off the network. :(

      Perhaps if you had read the installation notes about RAID...

    11. Re:Painless Upgrade by n0dna · · Score: 1

      Or gotten the Alternative version that supports raid...

    12. Re:Painless Upgrade by mkro · · Score: 3, Funny
      You can first install the 5.10 to your hard disk, and then do the changes as above to get upto 6.06.
      Cool. Anyone know where I can find the 5.10 torrent?
      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    13. Re:Painless Upgrade by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't even need to modify sources.list directly.

      $ gksu update-manager -d

      Will tell you that a new release is available will do everything for you.

    14. Re:Painless Upgrade by freddy151 · · Score: 1

      The up grade went real good did not take that long on my DSL,I have been using UBUNTU for a couple of years now,I like it it works well and it is not windows,I was so sick of that crap,I have not as yet had any problems with dapper drake it works just great,I would recomend it to anyone that has the since to want to get away from windows.I tried mandrake,suse,I think ubuntu is the way to go.

    15. Re:Painless Upgrade by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yikes. Ok, the easiest route via update manager was fine, but the other two... I quote:

      "EXTREMELY IMPORTANT! Make sure you type dist-upgrade rather than upgrade . The process will totally hose your machine and render it *completely unbootable* otherwise."

      Is it just me or shouldn't that be impossible? Can't you at least fix the dependecy tree so that it'll barf out an error message? I mean I've used tools that are like "do it exactly this way, in this order, OR ELSE..." but that on much more obscure things...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    16. Re:Painless Upgrade by mkro · · Score: 1

      That's it, I'm giving up on this whole "humour" subculture, as I obviously do not master it :(

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    17. Re:Painless Upgrade by chriseyre2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have simple upgrade instuctions here: http://devrants.blog.com/Ubuntu/

    18. Re:Painless Upgrade by poolmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe try and teach your granny [Ctrl]+[C] & [Ctrl]+[V].

      :)

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    19. Re:Painless Upgrade by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

      "<esc> wq"

      Why do people insist on using slower VI syntax? Use instead:

      ":x"

        -- that writes, then exits the program. It's what you want anytime you'd think to do a wq.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    20. Re:Painless Upgrade by misleb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to take the wind out of the Ubuntu sails or anything, but such upgradability has been a feature of Debian for a long time now. Ubuntu just inheritted it. I have a Debian desktop that was once installed 8 years ago with Debian 1.2 or something like that and through the years it has been upgraded from one stable release to the next (and sometime unstable/testing). The HD was also moved into faster boxes.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    21. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I have a Debian desktop that was once installed 8 years ago

      so you got the opportunity to use dist-upgrade what, twice?

    22. Re:Painless Upgrade by palumbor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well I love Ubuntu, but the upgrade was *not so painless* for me and a few other users according to the forums. The upgrade process seems to fail on specific motherboards upon detecting that PCMCIA does not exist. If you are upgrading from Breezy, the kernel has no support to restart the detection or for this instance, fail out. Upon restarting the system, you are left with a hodge-podge Breezy/Dapper install that fails even in safe mode due to the newly introduced PCMCIA junk. If anyone is seriously considering using the GUI upgrade system, check that your motherboard works. If someone runs into this problem -- Boot using any live cd and just rm everything related to PCMCIA in etc so the system fails PCMCIA check, but at least does not hard lock. From here you can dist-upgrade the remaining packages from Dapper and everything should work fine. Once the new kernel has been installed, PCMCIA detection isn't a problem... Other than that, it seems speedier than Breezy and I'm loving the fact that SMP kernel is now integrated into the main -- saves me a reboot or three.

    23. Re:Painless Upgrade by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      RAID is always a little tricky. I have a RAID1 on my NForce4 system. It's really just a software RAID that's configured through BIOS. The Suse 10.1 and Fedora Core 5 installers both found the NVIDIA RAID, but I was too nervous to actually install them. The Ubuntu 6.06 installer sees the individual drives. The only distro I have on there now is Gentoo which I hacked with a custom initrd to mirror the partitions on the two drives with dm-mirror.

    24. Re:Painless Upgrade by Random+Destruction · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Viva package managers is more like it. This doesn't require apt.

      --
      :x
    25. Re:Painless Upgrade by BohKnower · · Score: 1

      People insist on it just to annoy you. Who cares? ":wq" or ":x" or ZZ. I use the last form, for me your way is the slower way.

    26. Re:Painless Upgrade by misleb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Off the top of my head: 1.2 -> 2.0 -> 2.1 -> 2.2 -> 3.0 -> 3.1

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    27. Re:Painless Upgrade by Goodgerster · · Score: 0

      Uh, APT is a package manager.

    28. Re:Painless Upgrade by MoxFulder · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have no idea about what that alarmist warning is about. Normally, if you do upgrade rather than dist-upgrade, it'll just not upgrade all of the packages, because it will only upgrade packages which are straightforward changes from version X to version Y. When you do dist-upgrade rather than upgrade, it will also rearrange dependencies so that if package A formerly depended on package B, and now A depends on C and B is no longer needed, it will do The Right Thing.

      To make a long story short, upgrade is basically just more conservative and "stupid"... I've never had a problem doing an upgrade rather than a dist-upgrade.

    29. Re:Painless Upgrade by Val314 · · Score: 1

      i did the same and the X Server didnt start anymore.

    30. Re:Painless Upgrade by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Informative

      I didn't even need to do that... After my latest update of breezy yesterday (which updated update manager... :) ), I launched the update manager again from the menu, entered my password, and it told me there was a new version of ubuntu available... all I had to do was click on the upgrade button and follow the prompts... never once had to launch a terminal and use the command prompt...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    31. Re:Painless Upgrade by Aadomm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry but i think that was your parent's point. APT is a single example of a package manager, therefore it is wrong to attribute specifically to APT behaviour which is characteristic of package managers in general.

      --
      Mention the Lord of the Rings one more time and I'll more than likely kill you.
    32. Re:Painless Upgrade by lubricated · · Score: 1

      looks like you forgot the colons but there are easier ways

      instead of :l,$s

      you can do :%s/breezy/dapper/g

        ZZ

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    33. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My grandmother's head exploded just after she finished typing the "vi /etc/apt/sources.list" part"

      Your Grandma should know she can alternatively type: pico, nano, gedit, etc... to use a text editor that doesn't require her, and her fadding memory, to rely on memorized key sequences to do the basics of what a text editor should do.

    34. Re:Painless Upgrade by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      Whoa! I've been running the new release for two days and didn't even know it! I thought I was still running the beta.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    35. Re:Painless Upgrade by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Don't do that. I laughed. But then my humour button may be suspect ;-)

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    36. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is actually the first Linux install where I accidentally reformated my partition :(

      I first try out Linux in 2000, since then I have installed different versions of Linux about 5 times. Never really stay with any of them because the interface pretty much sucks (yea, it's my opinion). I had gave up on all of the Linux, but I keep hearing about how Ubuntu is different. So I give it a try yeasterday.

      I have a 2GB partition set for different OS, but Ubunu needs 2GiB, so I try to use some of the other formatted partitions, not much luck. On the first try, it has the tick mark on the 3 item on the list as to reformat, it's OK, since it's the 2GB partition. When it complain it didn't have enough space, it goes to the same list again, I adjust the other things for the / partition; clicking forward reformated one of my other 10GB partition, some how move the the 3 item on the list. I didn't notice the change because it was USB/SOMELENGTHYSTRING/MORESTUFF/PARTITION2 and then change to USB/SOMELENGTHYSTRING/MORESTUFF/PARTITION3.

      So reformated 10 GB of data, didn't install right, uh, that was my experience with Ubuntu. Why does it require 2GiB of space (I'm not going to install a lot of those software)? Why must it require a swap space (I don't want it)? Why not include a graphical representation of the hard drive layout on partition tool (or at list don't change the list items)?

    37. Re:Painless Upgrade by shish · · Score: 2, Interesting
      *completely unbootable*

      I did it the wrong way, and X broke horribly (the change to a modular server is a bigger package reorganisation than mere "upgrade" is designed for). However it was /bootable/, and a dist-upgrade from within the crippled box mostly fixed it.

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    38. Re:Painless Upgrade by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      so you got the opportunity to use dist-upgrade what, twice?

      Brilliant. Just brilliant.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    39. Re:Painless Upgrade by bertramwooster · · Score: 1

      While I like Ubuntu, my upgrade was not so painless. In fact, since I prefer to use the console than a gui to install/upgrade, I actually did apt-get dist-upgrade on my laptop which has xubuntu, and the upgrade went smoothly. However, when I logged into Xubuntu, the upgrade didn't appear too clean. The desktop behaved different, there were 2 file managers, and some other inconsistencies. Then I discovered that my laptop wouldn't hibernate. Rather than figure out what went wrong, I installed Dapper from scratch, and I noticed that look and feel as well as desktop behaviour was better than the upgrade.

      Dapper is good, but the upgrade was not smooth.

    40. Re:Painless Upgrade by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Is there any way to easily recover your system from this, as in a 'recover' type operation? If apt can upgrade, can it also restore?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    41. Re:Painless Upgrade by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 2, Informative
      Or ...
      $ sed -e 's/breezy/dapper' /etc/apt/sources.list | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list && sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo shutdown -r now
      Yes, upgrade after dist-upgrade ... this makes sure everything's up-to-date.
    42. Re:Painless Upgrade by SeraphimX · · Score: 1

      That would be great, but i there was no choice of version when i did the update, it was just a simple update. Before my sofware raid worked fine, as it did out of the box with 5.10

      And that doesnt explain what broke Xwindows since the root drive was not on raid.

      Also with the DVD there is no version, there is just one DVD, i assume that it should do everything, but i didnt get that far, the Kubuntu DVD did not pick up my mouse so i figured it wasnt worth bothering trying to work on the sofware raid

    43. Re:Painless Upgrade by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      Either you have almost nothing installed on your system, or you are not being honest with us.

      I did the same yesterday. Finally, I thought, for I couldn't believe all this "dist-upgrade" stuff Debian fan-boys were talking about for years before I saw it with my very eyes. The wish to try it out was why I installed Ubuntu in the first place.

      First of all, it took me about 1 hour to download 1GB of changes. After that, the installation process started, and took 2 hours and some questions (which I most certainly did NOT want to answer with "y", as so many people advocate) for the process to stop with the following error message

      Errors were encountered while processing:
      tetex-base
      tetex-bin
      tetex-extra
      jadetex
      E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

      Shit. I removed those packages and started dist-upgrade again. This time, it seems, all went well, except for some 6 packages which were "held back". I managed to resolve those problems too, but it did take some time.

      After the next boot, I saw my X config was hosed. Sure thing, I said, that's because I have to re-install NVIDIA drivers. Bad luck - X kept failing on me, regardless of what I tried.

      Finally, I managed to activate the "nv" driver, go graphics (aptitude in the console is... well, let's be gentle and say "not a pleasant experience", except if you have a *lot* of time on your hands to RTFM). After installing the most current kernel (386 - eeeek) and the NVIDIA drivers from the Ubuntu repository, I was finally able to get my X back to where it was before the upgrade.

      All in all, some 3.5 hours, during which I had to pull some of the tricks I learned in the past 10+ years of Linux experience. NOT BAD AT ALL, for a distribution upgrade, but FAR FAR FAR away from the "15 minutes" fairytale I keep hearing about.

      All aside: the system really looks & works great now! There are still some minor annoyancies that I'll have to resolve in the months to come, but that's OK.

      To all newbies: don't try this at home, except if it's OK if you screw up your system. The easier way, based on my experience, would be to get the DVD and install the upgrade on another partition.

    44. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of self respecting nerd are you? You took all the fun out of it!

    45. Re:Painless Upgrade by miro+f · · Score: 2, Informative

      all your granny needs to do is run the update manager, it will let her know there's a new version of ubuntu ready for her to upgrade if she wishes

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    46. Re:Painless Upgrade by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Informative
      No vi required;
      sudo bash
      sed -i.bak -e 's/breezy/dapper/g' /etc/apt/sources.list
      apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade && shutdown -r now
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    47. Re:Painless Upgrade by JeffElkins · · Score: 1
      Very _painful_ upgrade here.

      The download went well, but once the upgrade started to apply itself, oh brother! It initially quit with:

      Preparing to replace libuuid1 1.38-2ubuntu1 (using .../libuuid1_1.38-2ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libuuid1 ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_079-0ubuntu34_i386.de b E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

      apt-get install -f started the process again but from then on it crashed several more times requiring a dpkg --configure -a each time. It finally finished, but I'm left minimal volume on my sound when the speakers are cranked up to full blast (yes, I've checked alsamixer) and other bootup messages I'm going to have to track down and fix. Cups error messages, program not found errors from RC scripts, etc.

      Sunday will be devoted to cleanup, I guess :(

      --
      Why is all the good stuff already modded 5, when I have mod points?
    48. Re:Painless Upgrade by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Haha, same here - been running Dapper since flight6. First the "Ubuntu Dapper Beta" GNOME splash came one day ("wow, I thought I was running alpha!") then the "Beta" disappeared :)

      A recent update broke fglrx though (display gets way too bright), and the libGL.so.1.2 "fix" didn't work for me, so I'm back to the "ati" driver for now. No biggie, luckily TV out still works with fglrx. Crappy 9250, hate hate hate!

    49. Re:Painless Upgrade by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      Took all day on Friday (still wasn't finished when I left for the weekend (long 4-day weekend too!). Of course my computer at work is just a PIII 700 or 800 MHz with 256 MB RAM.

      I guess somthing is probably broken then.

      I did my old laptop: PIII500, 256 Mb mem, took about 1 hour 40 minutes to upgrade most components.
      But there were some times in there that I had to intervene and stop the screen saver thrashing the drives during the process.

      That didn't fix an AC/Battery problem that I've had for a while, so I then downloaded the LiveCD, and installed 6.06 from scratch in about 1 hour 20. Battery stuff works fine now. Just keep a record of the extra stuff that you've got on there so you can reload later.

      Basically painless.

    50. Re:Painless Upgrade by flacco · · Score: 1
      I actually did apt-get dist-upgrade on my laptop which has xubuntu, and the upgrade went smoothly. However, when I logged into Xubuntu, the upgrade didn't appear too clean.


      when i first tried upgrading to dapper RC, the upgrade failed. once i removed the installed but unused xubuntu-desktop package that i tried out a few months ago, the upgrade went fine.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    51. Re:Painless Upgrade by HiThere · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure what it's about either...but...

      This morning I was upgrading my debian Etch, and got a rather scarey message concerning xwindow-xorg. It didn't cause any problems on my system, but apparently on some systems it destroys the Xorg part without replacing it. ("So be sure you check, and replace it if you need to.") That was the first time I've seen quite such a scarey message during an upgrade, and I wasn't even moving off of Etch.

      I'm not sure this is relevant, but given how similar Ubuntu and Debian still are, it could well be.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    52. Re:Painless Upgrade by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Not all package managers work that way. Red Hat, e.g., was never able to upgrade their systems via rpm. Perhaps they are now able to, but back before Fedora they couldn't. (I always assumed that the fact that they sold new copies instead of upgrades had something to do with their lack of innovation in this area...but that was definitley an assumption.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    53. Re:Painless Upgrade by scott_karana · · Score: 1

      In vi, you can use the % symbol instead of 1,$ for those that love those little keystroke-saving tips.
      Also, you forgot the colon. ;)

    54. Re:Painless Upgrade by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      I think that's the command to download blipverts.

    55. Re:Painless Upgrade by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      If you fail to do the dist-upgrade, there is a strong possibility that X will not work properly. Depending on your level of technical expertise, this may or may not qualify as "completely unbootable". The base system should never be so completely broken that you can't recover it, but it is possible.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    56. Re:Painless Upgrade by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      I'm a Grandpa using Linux... so it's ready for me and I'm ready for it...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    57. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expected.. every geek and their dogs compete to provide c00l update scriptse... How about doing it the way it was intended to do?

      I just opened this graphical upgrade-manager, it told me that there seems to be a new version available, do I want to upgrade. Two clicks and some waiting and I had dapper working (it modified the sources.list for me). How'd that work for your mom?

    58. Re:Painless Upgrade by Clansman · · Score: 1

      I think you have to *specify* that you want to install a dist upgrade actually, if you don't you just get offered minor upgrades to your existing version.

    59. Re:Painless Upgrade by antoinjapan · · Score: 1

      Thats the last time I'm typing ESC :wq....this is why I suffer through bad comments on Slashdot...cheers

    60. Re:Painless Upgrade by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      In the new version of the tutorial:
      nano /etc/apt/sources.list

      hahahhahaha,
      Ben

    61. Re:Painless Upgrade by lon3st4r · · Score: 1
      this year, it's Emotion, Economics, Emblem, and Europe

      So are we going to see games based on tear-jerker soap operas...?

      cut-scenes from the game: bill disappears (grief).. bill reappears (joy).. oh-no it's his evil twin (despair) .. oh-no it was him (surprise) .. oh-no! they're all dead (mourn).. oh-yes! they survived, what a miracle! (befuddled!)

      needless to say, to win the game, you'll have to introduce the maximum number of twists in the tale.

      * lon3st4r *

      ps: you can send somebody back-packing through europe to score some! ;)

    62. Re:Painless Upgrade by zootm · · Score: 1

      Of course, the GUI update manager installed by default can do this all automatically. Which is even easier.

    63. Re:Painless Upgrade by lon3st4r · · Score: 1

      sorry for the above post. got it in here by mistake. should've been posted to a different article!

    64. Re:Painless Upgrade by MeV-AW · · Score: 1

      I have an AMD 64 with 2 GB of RAM and Motherboard MSI, 2 HDD 200 GB S-ATA and Graphic Card ATI X600 Pro and i can't install the 5.04 and 5.10 nor 32 bit nor 64 bit works, perhaps PCI-e or my TFT 17'' Benq FP783 :S and i want to install any kind of Ubuntu Xubuntu or Kubuntu or any kind of Linux and I cant i've tried with Opensuse 10, Fedora 3 & 4, The only one that works in desktop mode is Debian Sarge 3.1r but only at 800x600 and i was crazy about this, anyone can help me to solve this ?? i'm new at slashdot and i dunno how often i can visit the page if anyone can send me an e-mail explaining me or an url ... i will thank him a lot. my e-mail : alpanez.alcalde@gmail.com

    65. Re:Painless Upgrade by Zwaxy · · Score: 1
      $ gksu update-manager -d
      Be careful with that one - the '-d' flag tells the update manager to check for the latest development version of Ubuntu. That's fine at the moment, but in a week or two the "Edgy Eft" repositories will have opened, and will in all probability be very broken for a while. You don't want to upgrade to that version quite yet.

      So just:

          "gksu update-manager"

      will do the trick, safely.
    66. Re:Painless Upgrade by Zwaxy · · Score: 1
      Can this upgrade be done from a live CD version?
      In other words, if I have live CD V 5.1 Can I then do a hard disk installation / upgrade to the new Dapper version?

      You can first install the 5.10 to your hard disk,
      If you only have the 5.10 live CD, you won't be installing anything. The 5.10 live CD is *only* a live CD, with no install option.

      It's only in 6.06 that the live CD has an "install" icon on the desktop.
    67. Re:Painless Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach granny how to copy and paste!

  3. But does it run... by Ant+P. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    XGL?

    1. Re:But does it run... by Oink · · Score: 1

      Actually . . . yes! There's a tutorial in the Ubuntu forums on how to get XGL up and running. It isn't enabled by default (obviously) since it's still rather unstable.

      --
      ----------------- Oink. Moo. rarr! -----------------
    2. Re:But does it run... by piquadratCH · · Score: 3, Informative
      But does it run XGL?

      With a little work, yes.

      If you're question was whether XGL is the default, the answer is of course no. XGL is unstable and it's future is uncertain as it's 'competitor' AIGLX is included in Xorg 7.1.

    3. Re:But does it run... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would hate to see XGL get canned. I just upgraded an older Suse version to 10.1 and setting up the XGL/Compiz stuff was extremely easy (install nvidia drivers and 3 or 4 rpms -- then turn it on through the control center). The eye candy is second to none. Some of it is just dressing, but some is going to great. For example, the Expose like feature is flawlessly smooth (compare to the clunky Kompose). I can't really say how impressed I am with it. For years, linux DEs have been perfectly functional and fairly good looking. Windows and OSX are goiong to have to play catch-up compared to XGL -- that feels good.

      Also, my hardware isn't awesome and it still runs great (athlon 2200+, 128mb nvidia based card -- I've never spent more than $65 on a video card so you know it isn't even close to top of the line).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:But does it run... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      AIGLX is the proper way to do it though, and it integrates with X as opposed to running on top of it. XGL is a nice preview of things to come, but it was developed without community input and actually really isn't implemented all that well. AIGLX should make it easy for developers to do all kinds of crazy stuff. They are both neat technologies, but AIGLX is the one that should be standardized on.
      Regards,
      Steve

    5. Re:But does it run... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      AIGLX is the proper way to do it though
      While on this subject, one should mention that a monolithic kernel is the wrong way to go. We should standardise on a microkernel like Hurd.

      Personally, I do not see a layered approach as being that much of a problem as long as it does not lead to performance issues, and experience to date indicates that XGL performs fine.

    6. Re:But does it run... by idonthack · · Score: 1
      From your linked article:
      It is stated, however, that both the AIGLX and Xgl projects will swap code and work in a partnership to ensure compatibility and improvements in both systems.
      Xgl won't go away. If anything they might merge.
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    7. Re:But does it run... by octopus72 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Xegl is a way to do it because AIGLX is just another similar way to do something like XGL - put an accelerated X windowing system in a full screen X window.

    8. Re:But does it run... by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes it does, but there are problems. (The same problems that exist in SuSE. No DRI being the #1). However, AIGLX is fairly stable, and I've been running it on my laptop for about 2 months now. There are some problems with playing video, and 3D graphics have a tendency to flicker, but I don't do any gaming on my laptop, so it doesn't bother me. I just make sure that I have a 2D screensaver selected, and it's fine.

    9. Re:But does it run... by TelJanin · · Score: 1

      XGL is implemented fine. It currently uses an existing X server as a backend, but also supports something called EGL for those drivers that support it.

  4. Here is why it is a big step by El+Cubano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This year has been a huge step forward for Desktop Linux users.

    I know that people here frequently complain about things like duplication of effort and forking as things that dilute the impact of Linux and free/open source software on the world. I tend to be of the opposite opinion. You want something geared at the business desktop with good integration and commercial support? Get SuSE. You want something that carries the name of a recognized brand? Get Fedora (yes it is still in many places considered the standard, just look at how many hosting providers provide is as the primary or only platform). You want something different that has a reputation for rock solid stability? Get Debian. You want a user-friendly Debian? Get Ubutnu.

    The point is that the diversity is what makes these things possible. None of those things would be done nearly as effectivly under a "one size fits all" approach.

    1. Re:Here is why it is a big step by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      You want something geared at the business desktop with good integration and commercial support? Get SuSE. You want something that carries the name of a recognized brand? Get Fedora (yes it is still in many places considered the standard, just look at how many hosting providers provide is as the primary or only platform). You want something different that has a reputation for rock solid stability? Get Debian. You want a user-friendly Debian? Get Ubutnu.

      You want desktop with good integration and commercial support that carries the name of a recognized brand, has a reputation for rock solid stability and is user-friendly? Well you're screwed :P

    2. Re:Here is why it is a big step by packetmon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with your post however I choose not to use Linux anymore. (I use FreeBSD). I recall the days of Slackware, Stormix, Redhat (Hurricane) and know that Linux has come a long way from my days of Slackware. While I have used Fedora, CentOS, Debian (Knoppix), and Ubuntu, I felt a long time ago there was a bit too much diversity for me and no core focus. I've always been a Solaris fan as well as well as (yikes) Irix. It's nice to see a more userfriendly Linux though since it becomes easier for Linux to go mainstream. I've had computer illiterate people use Fedora without issues. At the same time, I can see too many distros confusing newer people. "What's the difference between, Fedora, Ubuntu, Redhat, CentOS, SuSE, Mandrake, Slackware, YellowLinux?!". While I and those who've been using Linux, BSD, etc., may know, I feel its a bit too much. Seems like every year another distro pops up, gets hyped up, then slowly fades away...

    3. Re:Here is why it is a big step by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, that's Slackware.

      j/k ;)

    4. Re:Here is why it is a big step by Etyenne · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Get Fedora (yes it is still in many places considered the standard, just look at how many hosting providers provide is as the primary or only platform).

      That make me want to scream. Who is the idiot who want to build his web presence on an OS which bug fixes (including security) will stop being provided in six months ? Why, ho why, not CentOS or another of the RHEL clone instead ?

      Did Fedora Legacy got some traction while I was'nt looking ?

      --
      :wq
    5. Re:Here is why it is a big step by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      You want desktop with good integration and commercial support that carries the name of a recognized brand, has a reputation for rock solid stability and is user-friendly?

      Then you get Solaris 10. You didn't specify it had to be Linux...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Here is why it is a big step by yankpop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't see a problem here. The majority of what you learn in installing and setting up a linux box is distro-independent. When you add to that the fact that 90% of the desktop oriented distros ship with one of two desktops, there's really very little to distinguish among them for the uninitiated. It's true that newbies may not understand the differences among all the available distros, but they don't need to. All you need to know is to look at the top five or ten distros at distrowatch, and start trying them out. The first one that installs and recognises your hardware is the best distro for you.

      Eventually you'll learn how to run your first distro, and in the process learn enough to evaluate some of the others. There's nothing wrong with switching distros when your needs change. I mean, inevitably we all end up running Debian, but there's no need to rush people into it ;)

      And I'm not sure that the more limited number of *BSD systems offers any real solution to this 'problem' anyways. Consider the MSWindows user thinking of making the switch. If they are really put off by the number of linux distros, are they going to look at BSD as a simpler set of decisions to make, or does it just add one more decision they don't know enough to make?

      Ah, shit, I was having trouble deciding which linux to use, and now you're telling me that first I need to decide between linux and this BSD thing?

      yp.

    7. Re:Here is why it is a big step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting criteria:

      - good integration and commercial support
      - carries the name of a recognized brand
      - something different that has a reputation for rock solid stability
      - user-friendly

      I can't help but think that Apple's Mac OS X meets all of these. Besides being proprietary, what exactly about Mac OS X is not "nearly as effectiv[e]" compared to these four Linux distributions? Why would you think that any of these criteria are mutually exclusive?

      Take Firefox, for example. It does pretty well (but not perfectly) against these criteria. I see no reason why it couldn't, in a couple years, be going great on all four. And once you realize that a major application can meet all four criteria (and be open-source), why can't an operating system?

      I looked in your comment for an argument in favor of "duplication of effort and forking" and I couldn't really find one. We have four major distros that each do one thing well -- so? Why is that good? Wouldn't having one system that did everything well be just as good, or better?

    8. Re:Here is why it is a big step by yankpop · · Score: 1
      Besides being proprietary, what exactly about Mac OS X is not "nearly as effectiv[e]" compared to these four Linux distributions?

      In other words, besides not being FOSS, what makes Mac OS X a bad FOSS operating system?

      yp.

    9. Re:Here is why it is a big step by misleb · · Score: 1

      I can't help but think that Apple's Mac OS X meets all of these. Besides being proprietary, what exactly about Mac OS X is not "nearly as effectiv[e]" compared to these four Linux distributions? Why would you think that any of these criteria are mutually exclusive?

      My experience is that OS X servers are not rock-solid dependable. Unless you have a Network full of OS X clients and want all the OpenDirectory Apple management nicities, OS X does not make a great server, IME. It is also a little on the slow side. Good desktop though.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    10. Re:Here is why it is a big step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, besides not being FOSS, what makes Mac OS X a bad FOSS operating system?

      Exactly. Is the only way to make a good general-purpose operating system, to keep it proprietary? Is the best a free/open-source system can do to make four separate operating systems, each good at one thing?

      Do contributors to these distributions really believe this? If so, could this be the reason for the limitations, e.g., could Debian contributors have given up on usability, and so are content with an OS that most people (even Linux geeks) find hard to use? (Disclaimer: I've used Debian for years, but I'm not going to pretend it's easy to use.)

      I've been contributing to free software for years. If I'd thought that by being free, that automatically made the program unable to compete with proprietary programs on common axes of quality (like the four criteria given above), maybe I wouldn't have bothered. But I really don't see why that is necessarily the case.

      Part of me even thinks it's a shame that RMS didn't wait 20 years before starting GNU. Maybe then we would be cloning Mac OS X, instead of crappy 1980's Unix workstations. Of course, Mac OS X is built in part on what RMS did with GNU, so that would require a bit of a time loop.

    11. Re:Here is why it is a big step by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Part of me even thinks it's a shame that RMS didn't wait 20 years before starting GNU. Maybe then we would be cloning Mac OS X, instead of crappy 1980's Unix workstations. Of course, Mac OS X is built in part on what RMS did with GNU, so that would require a bit of a time loop.

      I give Stallman props for GNU Emacs and gcc, but the man has trouble with entire OSes. Also, could one clone OS X?

    12. Re:Here is why it is a big step by pupeno · · Score: 1

      I think (K)Ubuntu might be very commercial as well.

      --
      Pupeno
    13. Re:Here is why it is a big step by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Great point, not to forget that many of this distros collaborate and use work one from another. Ubuntu uses Debian work, Debian gets bug reports and fixes (no, the relation is not perfect from what I hear, but what human or company relation is?)

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    14. Re:Here is why it is a big step by really? · · Score: 1

      Just wait a few months and get Vista. It's all that and more.

      (Much more. To the tune of 10GB for an install, more...)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    15. Re:Here is why it is a big step by binner1 · · Score: 1

      Not sure why this got modded as flamebait. I completely agree with the poster. The Fedora's are not fit (or even meant) for production use on servers. Fedora is a development platform. Kernels get upgraded, major version changes happen in some packages, major things break (although they are generally corrected quickly). And this is good. FC is providing a path to the next RHEL. You can't do that without scrambling a few eggs. That being said, I generally don't like the eggs on my servers to be scrambled. There is a reason that Redhat sticks with the same kernel version, package versions, etc. Servers don't like surprises. The closer you stay to original software configuration, the less chance you have of upsetting something...or something else that depends on something. It's simple quality control.

      Now, obviously, in order for FC to be useful as a testing ground for the new RHEL's, it has to be run on servers and server hardware. I just wouldn't recommend you doing so on your mission critical machines...

      Couple the dynamic, fast paced nature of changes in the FC's with a short lifetime (ignoring for the moment fedora legacy) and you have a candidate for trouble in a production environment.

      I recently inherited an entire infrastructure built on FC4 and am moving it over to RHEL4. I want a longer supported lifetime. I want a more moderate patch brigade to keep up with. I want standardized software versions. I want long term stability. Do I use RHEL at home? Nope...debian testing/unstable and ubuntu...I can live with downtime and screwups at home. At work, I've got better things to do with my time.

      Flamebait, the parent was not!

      -Ben

  5. Pretty nice by sock3t · · Score: 1

    I havnt looked at Ubuntu in a while until this...

    I ran the live CD and right away had a few problems (that were, easily enough, fixed). I have a dual monitor setup (NV 7800 GS) and with both monitors plugged in, the screen was jumbled. Once I unplugged the 2nd monitor everything went smoothly. Even the bootup screens, etc, etc look very nice. I could see this "scaring" people a lot less than other linux distros.

    I was about to install it right away on my "Windows Box" right then and there, but forgot I'd have to dig up my RAID controller drivers. Oh well.

    1. Re:Pretty nice by Bwerf · · Score: 1

      Did you get it working with both screens if installing with just one? my last ubuntu installation couldn't cope with two screens ( or more likely I couldn't figure out how to get it up and running ).

      --
      If noone rtfa, then what's the slashdot effect?
    2. Re:Pretty nice by Council · · Score: 4, Informative

      To both parent and GP, I figured out how to do this. It takes some work, like many things in Linux, but is doable.

      http://www.ublug.org/ubuntu/twinview/twinview-howt o-breezy.html This may help.

      I had to put this in the Device section:

              Identifier "NVIDIA Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x]"
              Driver "nvidia"
      Option "RenderAccel" "1"
      Option "DigitalVibrance" "127" #Vary me
      Option "backingstore" "true"

      #twinview
              Option "TwinView" "1"
              Option "TwinViewOrientation" "RightOf"
              Option "SecondMonitorHorizSync" "31.5-82.0"
              Option "SecondMonitorVertRefresh" "50-70"
              Option "MetaModes" "1600x1200,1280x1024; 1280x1024,1280x1024; 1280x1024,NULL; 1024x768,NULL; 800x600,NULL; 640x480,NULL"

      Ubuntu has been wonderful compared to other Linux distros. There are still headaches, and I think it's disingenuous to say that it is anywhere near as easy to use as Windows. I gave Dapper (beta 6) to my friend, claiming this. He was happy with the install and was delighted when the first thing he saw was that it had put icons on his desktop for his Windows drive. He clicked on them, and it said "you do not have permission to access this" (because the drives are mounted by root). There was no obvious recourse (the solution being editing /etc/fstab). From that point on, selling Ubuntu to him as easy-to-use was something of a losing battle.

      It just really bothers me that literally the first thing he saw on his nice, clean desktop was broken. I have had exactly the same situation in installs on other computers (which is why I knew how to fix it). I sincerely hope this is working in the current release.

      I use Ubuntu as my desktop OS, mainly because of Ion3. I love the strength and flexibility of Linux. But I no longer recommend it to those without serious computer experience. Ubuntu is trying very hard, but I think it's gonna take them a couple more years. I know this is the cliche in Linux, "ready for the desktop in five years", and I don't think it will necessarially be that long.

      It's just that any OS designed for non-experts needs to do a lot more whole-system novice-user testing.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    3. Re:Pretty nice by Locutus · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, it should be easier but the concept of privileges will be new to many many MS Windows users but they'll have to get used to it or else wait til Microsoft forces it on them in a totally inconsistant way. MSFT let them slide with running as admin for far too long and the destruction from viral infections, spyware, etc shows how flawed this is. *nix systmes have a long long lead in this regard but it should surely be easier for the user to change permissions without making it a security risk.

      I'm on a KDE desktop now so I can't check to see if there's a way to put gsudo(?) in front of the call to nautilus for that drive object instead of having to edit fstab as root.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:Pretty nice by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      I agree that to a new user, the hard drive icons are "broken", because they are. It's stupid that they don't include easy instructions to correct the problem in countries where the solution is legal. All they have to do is base the Instructions popup on the country of install origin.

      Easy Ubuntu is something I've tried a little bit, and seems to work for a lot but I don't know if it introduces a Read/Write NTFS driver or not? What's the easiest graphical way to edit the fstab? Until there's a simple checkbox with a legal disclaimer, it's hard to sell Ubuntu to a novice user as something they can set up for themselves with as little effort as Windows.

    5. Re:Pretty nice by xenocide2 · · Score: 1
      He clicked on them, and it said "you do not have permission to access this" (because the drives are mounted by root). There was no obvious recourse (the solution being editing /etc/fstab). From that point on, selling Ubuntu to him as easy-to-use was something of a losing battle.


      I hear Windows Vista is aiming to meet or beat Ubuntu on this.
      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    6. Re:Pretty nice by Council · · Score: 1

      The "read" NTFS driver is included with Ubuntu. The drive is in fact mounted readable -- it's just only readable by root. Nothing to do with legality.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    7. Re:Pretty nice by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I believe that they've fixed this in 6.06. NTFS partitions are now mounted as read-only to all users.

  6. Desktop/Server/Alternate by MountainMan101 · · Score: 1

    The ISO come in 3 flavours, desktop and server are obvious - what is Alternate? All three types are available in a range of architectures. Couldn't find a simple answer. Will be trying this out on my new laptop (an HP) as according to the Ubuntu website there is an HP customized version of ubuntu - which hopefully will now have the native broadcom wireless drivers.

    1. Re:Desktop/Server/Alternate by jmataya · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the Ubuntu website http://www.ubuntu.com/ />, alternate is for:

      * creating pre-configured OEM systems;
      * setting up automated deployments;
      * upgrading from older installations without network access;
      * LVM and/or RAID partitioning;
      * installing GRUB to a location other than the Master Boot Record;
      * installs on systems with less than about 192MB of RAM.

      Sounds to me like something that could be invaluable to people not necessarily running the latest and greatest.

    2. Re:Desktop/Server/Alternate by swab79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The desktop CD boots into a live session and lets you install from there, with very few options that can be changed.

      The alternate CD boots into the old text based installer, and allows more options to be configured.

      I don't much care for the desktop method of installing.. it didn't even ask if it was OK to install GRUB, just went ahead and did it.

    3. Re:Desktop/Server/Alternate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would liked to have had an easier way to use the default partitions with a different file system. So it did not allow me to change the file system at a point where I had my partitioning determined (the default was ok). I would have liked to have had an option to change it to ReiserFS (like my SuSE distro is running) or XFS. But, that extra choice step in the from the Live CD install was not an option during the install (maybe one of the other install CDs allows for the choice of a different file system)?

      Other than that when I added Gwenview from the list of programs that I could add, it sure would be nice to have also had an easy way to install the KIPI plugins too or to have had Gwenview show up with the plugins already installed?

    4. Re:Desktop/Server/Alternate by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I heard tell that alternate might allow installation on existing linux partitons. As it is right now, I have never been able to install ubuntu as it can't see the existing EXT3 partitions or swap partiton that I have from a current Mandriva install.

      Until they fix their disk partitioner to see existing partition, I consider it not ready.

      BTW some people said run gparted from the desktop before I run the installer. It doesn't see the partitions either.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    5. Re:Desktop/Server/Alternate by crwl · · Score: 2, Informative

      The desktop installer can install just fine on existing partitions, I did that yesterday and it worked fine. It was in fact Kubuntu, but it would be strange for them to have so big functionality differences between the installers...

    6. Re:Desktop/Server/Alternate by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You have to watch what you buy.

      I just purchased an HP myself. A HP/Compaq actually and researched the AMD vs intel chipset notebooks. Intel has been historically behind on support for wifi chipsets but the situation has changed.

      I googled the broadcom chipset and went to broadcoms site noticed their attitute is "Go use NDIS and buy a copy of windows". I feel its the same attitude of game makers as soon as macs supported bootcamp.

      Its currently being reversed engineered but until broadcom stops wanting to be cheap by cancelling linux support since NDIS is available I would write them an email complaining and just go through the nasty hassle of using windows dlls via NDS under linux.

      Needless to say my v4000 intel wifi was detected by default. Since its new I would say thats pretty impressive and I am glad I picked the Intel V4000 instead of the AMD v5015.

    7. Re:Desktop/Server/Alternate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ..as according to the Ubuntu website there is an HP customized version of ubuntu

      what what! where! how! ...

      HP NX6125

  7. I still can't... by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    ... boot the Live CD properly. Guess the reviewers were more lucky than me.

    1. Re:I still can't... by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      this might sound obvious but you did burn from the iso rather than unpacking didn't you?

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:I still can't... by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      this might sound obvious but you did burn from the iso rather than unpacking didn't you?

      Neither. I just went to Ubuntu's web site and wished it boots up really hard. Didn't work.

    3. Re:I still can't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I still can't...boot the Lice CD properly..."

      Try shiny side down in the drive tray.

    4. Re:I still can't... by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I decided to switch from Slackware 10.2 to Kubuntu when the company bought new computers for the tech department. They bought new Dells (don't hate me, I didn't really have a choice) and the Kubuntu install went very well on mine and my co-worker's computers, with the singular exception that I had to install in safe graphics mode and then update the video drivers to ATI's hardware accelerated stuff.

      I also installed dapper beta on an OLD Compaq Armada 500mhz a few weeks ago, and it went smooth as silk.

      But when he tried to install them on the old Dell he WAS using, and another computer (I don't know anything about it) it failed in the graphical department completely. Not even safe mode worked.

      So, 3 out of 5 computers worked with it... and only 2 without a significant hitch. (Well, he didn't have it plugged into the internet at first and it appeared to hang until he plugged in a cable, then had an apt source missing later, but that was fixable and not Kubuntu's problem, really.)

      Not exactly the best results in the world... But it's definitely coming along.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:I still can't... by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Try shiny side down in the drive tray.

      I'd like to reply ironically, please pick the funniest one:

      What do you mean "[insert word]" ?

      a) shiny
      b) side
      c) drive
      e) it's not a butter

  8. Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by bwd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not ready for grandma to use, and as such, it's not an XP replacement. It still takes many keystrokes to get MP3 and video codec support. Want a binary nvidia driver? Due to ideological reasons, you'll need to manually enable universe and install it. And exotic wifi protocol support is still spotty (but better). Try explaining all that to someone who is computer illiterate. All they know is that this stuff works automatically in XP or OSX.

    Not that I'm ragging on Dapper Drake; I installed it the first day it came out. But it is being touted as an XP replacement when it isn't. I think it is only a marginal improvement over the last version in terms of ease of use for people who aren't already savvy. The improved theme certainly looks good, but that only goes so far when you are looking to replace XP for normal users. I think the Ubuntu team really needs to rethink leaving out MP3 decoders and regular codec support. Microsoft doesn't seem to have 'licensing issues' when they ship XP with those features, and neither does Apple.

    1. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by swab79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah but if YOU do the install, it is ready for grandma to use. I don't think grandma would do too well installing XP either.

    2. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, did it occur to you that M$ paid for licenses to those stuff? That's why. For Ubuntu, I don't think anyone would be willing to pay for an unlimited number of licenses of those technologies...

    3. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by DrXym · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      This is a major problem for all distributions. Basically I as a user don't give a damn if the driver I need to get my display to work is binary-only or not. I just want the installer to do its job and install the bloody thing.

      A dist should still offer to download and install it if it feels putting it on the CD violates their sensibilities in some way.

    4. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Microsoft doesn't seem to have 'licensing issues' when they ship XP with those features, and neither does Apple."

      - Microsoft and Apple pay license fees and charge it back to the customer. How do you propose Ubuntu do this with a free product?

      - Why does gramma need a binary Nvidia driver? Few play HL2.

      - Why does gramma need exotic wifi protocol support? Again, very few.

      You may as well criticize XP's poor scripting features will leave grammas confused.

    5. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Manually enabling" universe just means going to the gui, selecting it, and clicking the update button. I'm pretty sure windows doesn't come bundled with proper nvidia binaries either. You have to manually go to their website, download, and install.

      You act like users don't have problems with these issues in windows. I'm constantly doing mysterious incantations: rescans, refreshes, and reboots to get various wireless or networking things working. These are never going to work for grandma no matter what system you put in front of her. Oh, and can someone show me how to get AAC files to play in windows. I don't think it came installed with the right codecs.

    6. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by shreevatsa · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's not ready for grandma to use
      Grandma can use it easily enough if you set it up for her. Take a look at this.
      (Also consider it just proof of concept; you might not want to do exactly the same things. For example, it's better (IMHO) to do things the right way than to use automated options like Automatix or EasyUbuntu.)
    7. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      All they know is that this stuff works automatically in XP or OSX.

      Wanna bet? I had to reinstall XP on my step-dad's Compaq laptop a couple days ago and when I got into Windows nothing but wired LAN drivers were installed. I had to go to hp.com to get the (built-in)wireless LAN, audio, and video drivers installed. There was USB ability but there was still an unknown USB controller in Device Manager that I never did find the drivers for.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    8. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by say · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bah! Is MS paying these people to write one post like this on every mention of linux progress anywhere?

      Dear Sir,

      Your post is addressing the needs of a computer user (Grandma). You argue that she could not use Ubuntu Dapper for her computing needs. According to you, she would have problems with the following:

      • Getting mp3 and video support
      • Getting a binary NVIDIA proprietary video driver
      • Getting a driver for her exotic wi-fi card

      Because this is why she can't switch, I am guessing that you presume she does not know anyone who can help her with that. Fine. And because you argue that this is what makes Ubuntu inapt as an XP replacement, you must be arguing that she em can do all of that on her own with Windows XP.

      "Grandma" does not exist, so stop pulling her out. Let's analyse what kind of person Grandma would have to be to fit the description: She is concerned about the performance loss between the nv and nvidia drivers, but unable to follow the three steps documented under "documentation" on Ubuntus webpage to get the nvidia driver. Also, she is completely able to download and install an updated executable from the correct website when she is in Windows. That kind of person does not exist.

      I am really sick and tired over these kind of comments. "It is really good, I use it, but I doubt anyone could manage to use it". What you are trying to say, is that not everyone can setup and manage a computer, and maintain a healthy, powerful and updated operating system on it. This is old news. It applies just as much to your favoured operating system (which pshyciatric examination would reveal to be Windows) as Ubuntu Dapper.

      As a counter-point, and an exercise to the GP, please do compare the routine of installing office applications on Windows compared to Ubuntu Dapper. Oh, it came pre-installed on Dapper? OK, that's unfair. Then compare installing any other application on Dapper vs. Windows. The ease-of-use for new users is vastly better with Dapper's extremely user-friendly shell over apt-get and dpkg. Windows is more difficult on this much more common task for a newbie than installing custom, 4%-extra-performance-gaining graphic drivers.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    9. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Tx · · Score: 1

      You act like users don't have problems with these issues in windows.

      Absolutely right. although I'm not sure Windows should really be the ultimate standard Linux distros are aiming for. "Oh, it's only as bad as Windows" doesn't seem to me to be the kind of motto FOSS people want to live by.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    10. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo dpkg -i automatix_5.1-1_i386.deb

      Yeah, and then watch Automatix break packages, ignore warnings and screw up your Ubuntu system. Don't be a fool, use EasyUbuntu.

    11. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      It's been said before, and I'll say it again: Vanilla XP doesn't bring a functional DVD player or "recent" graphics drivers out of the box. In fact, it took a bit of effort and some counter intuitive stuff to get my Athlon 64's speed throttling working on XP (CPU drivers? never heard of them before. Setting the power mode to better battery life or some such? on a desktop? Wouldn't have crossed my mind). XP isn't that easy to install to the non technically inclined either. All in all, the experience between XP and Ubuntu is pretty similar in my book, usability wise. In some aspects (namely, apt/synaptic), Ubuntu is significantly better. And please do NOT equate video/audio codecs to ease of use. Those are two distinct matters. I'll grant you that I'd prefer to have MP3 support out of the box. But you'll have to grant THEM that when you are a free software business, things like heavily proprietary licences ARE a moral objectionable. And sticking to your morals is supposed to be a Good Thing.

    12. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by orasio · · Score: 1

      Grandma doesn't know how to install WinXP, either.
      If you need mp3, it's only a part of the installation to get it.
      Installing NVidia support, too.

      Installing Ubuntu + mp3 + nvidia binary drivers is not harder than installing XP, and least it was for me.

      Plus, when installing XP, you then need to install office software, plus some pdf reader, plus AV software, in order to have a usable desktop. Does grandma know how to get those things?

      Aside from that, even if lack of mp3 was a real problem, there's no reason why it should be included. If you want that kind of stuff, get SuSE, or any other distro that doesn't care about the freedom of their users. Ubuntu _is_ abaout the freedom of their users, too. Including mp3 would be encouraging the use of patented algorithms for no reason. That goes agains the freedom of the users, and this is not a time to be agnostic about that kind of thing. It is sensible to have an ideological posture.

    13. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Why do we need to see this every time? Who's talking about grandmothers here, or XP for that matter? I've never recomended anything but a Mac to someone over 65 because I doubt any grandmother I know could figure out either windows or linux, especially the instalation. I recomend ubuntu linux to anyone with computer literacy or interest in becoming computer literate and it is very good for that demographic. For an early 21st century operating system Ubuntu is easy to install, use and maintain. But it still is an early 21st century operating system and so that means that not every given person you can think of can use it effectively. Some people just don't grok computers and so no operating system on earth can help them (mac comes closest in my opinion, though I'd never use one myself).

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    14. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by bwd · · Score: 0, Troll
      Grandama doesn't exist? The hypothetical "grandma" is the vast majority of people who use computers: the relatively computer illiterate and non-tech savvy. Your points are absurd.

      Also, she is completely able to download and install an updated executable from the correct website when she is in Windows.

      Of course she is able to: Because Microsoft offers an automatic update feature. Grandma doesn't have to do anything but click "OK" to get her updates. And these updates from Microsoft include binary hardware drivers (unlike Ubuntu - due to ideological reasons)! Ubuntu's update service does not unless poor old grandma updates "Universe repository" (yea, I'm sure she'll understand what that is!).

      hat you are trying to say, is that not everyone can setup and manage a computer, and maintain a healthy, powerful and updated operating system on it.

      No, what I'm saying is that some operating systems have a long way to go before they equal the usability of XP or OSX. I think I said that quite bluntly. And when grandma, or any other non-tech savvy person, can't play MP3s or family videos on Ubuntu because of "licensing restrictions," they aren't going to know what to do. Oh, they're supposed to google "ubuntu mp3 support" and execute apt-get install gstreamer-whatever gstreamer-mpeg-whatever to get the support they need. Do you really think these "simple" commands are understandable to grandma? Or do you think she is even going to know what a repository is? Why would she fool around with this when she can just use XP?

      Then compare installing any other application on Dapper vs. Windows.

      Ok. In windows, grandma just double clicks a setup.exe which does all the work for her. If a similar application doesn't exist in the default Ubuntu repositories as a .deb package, then she's out of luck unless she knows how to ./configure ; make install.

      Windows is more difficult on this much more common task for a newbie than installing custom, 4%-extra-performance-gaining graphic drivers.

      That's an uninformed comment. Double clicking setup.exe every single time is not harder than having to compile some obscure application that doesn't exist in the repositories. And nvidia doesn't exist on merely 4% of computers. I'd wager that it's closer to 30% or 50%. And video acceleration is needed for a lot more than just video games. That is why microsoft provides these binary drivers in their Windows Update mechanism.

    15. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's way better than my reply to the same parent, I wish I had read it first.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    16. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by bwd · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, but I wasn't talking about the installation process. I think Ubuntu is quite easy to install. I was talking about every day hardware support and MP3/video codec support.

    17. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      And video acceleration is needed for a lot more than just video games.

      Sure ! It's absolutely essential to running that spiffy new interface they call Aero, or something.

      Beside that, I would not know.

      --
      :wq
    18. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      "All they know is that this stuff works automatically in XP or OSX."
      They may "know" it, but the rest of us know they're wrong. Every system needs configuration when you install new hardware or an OS. Most users just use whatever came on their computer; the work has been done for them, but it still had to be done. Windows won't magically work when you put new hardware in any more than Linux will.

      "I think the Ubuntu team really needs to rethink leaving out MP3 decoders and regular codec support. Microsoft doesn't seem to have 'licensing issues' when they ship XP with those features, and neither does Apple."
      Of course they don't, because they can license them. Who's going to pony up the cash to license them for an unlimited number of Ubuntu systems?

    19. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by shreevatsa · · Score: 1
      That's real easy as pie for grandma! *rolls eyes*
      1. What part of "if you set it up for her" didn't you get? Those lines are intended for you to do. (Unless you're talking of a Grandma setting it up for her Grandma, which is, um, too theoretical.)
      2. As I said, consider it just an idea of what can be done. I don't know why he's installing xterm when he already has a terminal (does Automatix need it?), or why he's using Automatix (which, although it does have a large number of satisfied users, has occasionally screwed up people's setups) when EasyUbuntu is just as good. Besides, as I said, the right way is to follow this.
      Sheesh, why am I having to repeat my post? ;)
    20. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by jcidiotashram · · Score: 1

      OK first of all I use debian. but it doesn't mean that i don't appreciate windows. especially after i tried to unsuccessfully install the binary ati driver for the new amd 64 i just built. even though i don't need the X as mostly it is going to be a server for backend applications. the point is even for a guy with 5 years experience with debian, redhat, it is challenging to get a computer with new components such as audio card, video card, even network card. luckily it is not my primary computer, i have a laptop from work(which obviously run windows 2000), so that i can google for every problem i encounter. what i don't understand is if someone says something nice about MS, others call him a traitor or being paid by MS. Most of the time i feel like this generic grandma who just wants to check the email or read news for which MS would do

    21. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by orasio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are a troll, whether you know it, or not.

      I could tell, because you highlight "./configure; make install"
      In fact, if it was _that_ simple, it would just be "make install", but it isn't.

      About clicking the "setup.exe" , well, someone need to tell you to do that. People don't know by default that they need to click that to install. Plus, they can't se the ".exe" in XP, because file extensions are hidden. So they need to click the "setup" file with the flashy icon. And with no help whatsoever, of course. Plus, the CD with the software popped out of nowhere. Or maybe "grandma" went to best-buy and bought the software.

      Let's talk a little bit about me. I use Ubuntu, and I didn't use ./configure;make;make install since I am using Ubuntu. It has _all_ the software I need. I'm very confident that "grandma" doesn't need more software than I do. If she has more esoterical needs, maybe she could get someone to help her, but then your user is not "grandma" anymore.

    22. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by brainee28 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You just don't get it do you? The vast majority of PC's that "Grandma" are using are Dell's, Compaq/HP's, Gateway's or Sony's These all come PRE-INSTALLED with MP3 Support, DVD Support, and Multimedia CODECS. This type of user never reinstalls their systems from scratch. Restore discs, Geek Squad, or grandson with computer experience. The comparison is flawed. Windows XP on its own does not prepackage any MP3 support, any DVD support, and any "accelerated" video drivers from Nvidia or ATI. None of these are available from Microsoft via Windows Update that I know of. I'm sick of hearing this FUD argument.

    23. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Your grandma plays 3d games and downloads music from thepiratebay? The reason neither Apple nor MS (nor many commercially distributed Linux distros) have problems is that they charge money for their software. Moreover, neither Apple nor MS feel any obligation to make it easy to modify and redistribute their software the way Ubuntu does.

      For a long time the argument against MP3 was pretty simple: liscencing fees were expensive. But Fluendo appears to be offering mp3 support in gstreamer free of charge. The only argument remaining is redistribution. Obviously, Ubuntu would be in a pickle if they started saying redistribution didn't matter, as that's how they operate, as a modification and redistibution of Debian. Participating in the Fluendo deal would require them to discourage people from doing the same thing they're doing. Basically, if it weren't for these "liscencing issues" Ubuntu couldn't exist in the first place.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    24. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      I was talking about every day hardware support and MP3/video codec support.

      Just run the script. Easier than chasing codecs... http://easyubuntu.freecontrib.org/

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    25. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Alef · · Score: 1
      Yeah but if YOU do the install, it is ready for grandma to use.

      Indeed.

    26. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Try ubuntu, it generally installs sound, video, network, etc. out of the box with no hassle. Judging ubuntu based on your experience with debian is like judging Ronald Regan on your experience with Charles Manson, since they both come from California.

      This story was about a new version of ubuntu, it has nothing to do with windows or grandma. It is one thing to be nice to MS, it is another thing to bring up argumentative remarks prasing MS in its ability to cater for a hypothetical grandma in a story centred on another operating system. Furthermore it is something that we have all heard many times and doesn't really bring in anything new or insightful, thus the only reason for its existance is to disrupt an otherwise happy discussion.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    27. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Eideewt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your kidding yourself if you believe that good old Hypothetical Grandma can install Windows XP and get her video drivers (preperatory to pwning some noobs in CS:S, one would imagine). I won't try to convince you that she could do it in Dapper either, but Grandma is not going to track down ATIs driver page, download the drivers, answer whatever questions come up in the install, reboot her computer, then get her game on. Grandma isn't dumb, but Grandma has no interest whatsoever in drivers (whatever those are). Grandma just wants here Counterstrike fix. It's going to be her tech-savvy grandson that gets the computer set up.

      Maintaining a computer is not difficult, although is can be a little arcane. Anyone *can* learn to maintain them. It's whether you want to that counts. If you can't figure out how to work Linux, it's because you don't want to, not because it's too hard. "Too hard" just means that you don't know how to do it already, and you don't want to learn. Windows is just as "too hard" as most Linux distros to someone who doesn't know how to work it yet (like Grandma).

      As a side note, it's never as simple as clicking setup.exe and letting it do all the work. Almost any installer asks for an install path. Drivers generally like to ask you about installing some support software. That's not much, but it's still something, and it will confuse Grandma as much as ./configure ; make ; make install*. You're making Windows out to be a lot easier to use than it is. Windows doesn't even *have* a package manager, or an update service for every package installed through it. You get security updates, and occasionally a driver. Why complain about what happens under Linux when a package doesn't exist, but not complain about how Windows completely lacks the feature?

      * Actually, it often goes more like ./Here'sMyInstaller.run -- exactly the same as double clicking setup.exe.

    28. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > I just want the installer to do its job and install the bloody thing.

      Then bitch to nVidia about their driver (which violates the GPL to distribute). The Ubuntu people have no control over nVidia's poor choice of licensing. If you want everything to be easy, get a video card that has OSS drivers. I have a 945GM from Intel, and it works fine, no binary blobs required.

      http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#39

      Note the picture of Tux caught in an oil spill. That's what demanding binary blobs does to Linux.

      --
      My other car is first.
    29. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it comes with mp3 support, but other than that, you're spot on.

    30. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Quit bothering me about my posture!

      That aside, ideological posturing doesn't actually cut any cheese. MP3 is currently a standard; not supporting it does mean that your system is broken (provided that multimedia playback is a feature). If you want to improve the situation with patented codecs, distribute music in OGG format and help to develop better, free codecs. Send letters to Microsoft and mp3 player manufacturers encouraging them to support OGG. Don't just lock marginal portions of the population out of the bulk of available music.

    31. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      In fact, it's a pretty horrible idea to have barely computer-literate people downloading .exe installers off random web sites. Goodbye computer security: hello Bonzi Buddy! Package managers, in addition to being easy, give you one trusted source for your software.

    32. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most of the codecs you need can be found in multiverse. without the need for installing .debs from some random guy with beer in the url.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    33. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by ridewinter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My co-worker wasted a couple hours trying to install a second graphics card on Ubuntu, before inserting the card into a Windows machine and realizing that the card simply didn't work. IMO, that illustrates a significant reason to stay away from desktop Linux. Solving computer problems is complex enough already, adding in another dimension because of, say, uncertainty in the correctness of your config files, can greatly magnify the hassle and amount of wasted time. Yes, the time is worth it on mission critical applications, but I'm sticking to Windows for my desktop until my confidence in things "just working" increases enough to get rid of this dimension in problem solving.

    34. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by DrXym · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why should I bitch to them? They produce some of the best graphics cards out there and go to the effort of ensuring it works on Linux. You seem to be complaining that they're not throwing away their trade secrets just for your benefit.

    35. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Agreed,

      How many Windows users had actually installed it? Most of them bought their PCs with Windows pre-installed, and have no clue about how to do it themselves.

      How many of the average users out there know how to do a simple thing, like install a printer? Or how to keep their Windows up to date? Or how to keep it free from virus, trojans, spywares, etc?

      IMHO Ubunutu today is BETTER AND EASIER than WindowsXP for everyday usage, because it's safer, comes with more usefull software bundled, has better security and it's harder to break.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    36. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by symbolic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think I said that quite bluntly. And when grandma, or any other non-tech savvy person, can't play MP3s or family videos on Ubuntu because of "licensing restrictions," they aren't going to know what to do.

      Actually, I'd be more concerned that they know what this means rather than exactly what to do about it. They need to know that in some situations [insert licensing entity here] is either refusing to avail their 'technology' on this platform, or that they require payment in order to use it. I'd like to see Americans start to gain a greater understanding of the political aspect of technology, and how it affects the choices they have.

    37. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Alef · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you just said.

    38. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by jc87 · · Score: 1

      Funny thing , i am the "computer expert" around here , i installed && configured (and provide tech support) 3 diferent Win Boxes ( Sister , Sister boyfriend , and a friend of mine) and helped in the configurations of others.

      And let me tell you kind sir , It's not ready for grandma to use, and as such, it's not an XP replacement. It still takes many keystrokes to get MP3 and video codec support. Want a binary nvidia driver? Due to ideological reasons, you'll need to manually enable universe and install it , you are so wrong ....

      Do you think the owners of these 3 boxes are able to do those basic tasks? hell no!

      They cant install codecs , drivers , change default settings , burn a .iso , etc... and in case you dont know , not every single task in Windows can be done with/only double-click , and in several situations i have to do things for they.

      If you have Gnu/Linux friendly hardware , Ubuntu works out of the box , and to do thoose tasks you just have do modify your sources.list (5 minutes to do so , if you prefer you can just take a already "done" sources.list from ubuntuforums and replace yours) and then copy/paste commands from the thousand guides there is.

      With windows you have to search the web for software/mirrors/torrents/etc... with Ubuntu just use the add/remove programs gui.

      This summer im going to move the friend computer from XP to Ubuntu (and do the same configurations i would do with Windows) , he already uses Firefox + OOO + Gaim so it wont be a problem , the other two boxes will remain using XP for now (specially because both use office 2003 and OOO needs to improve in some areas , maybe when it reaches version 3.0 ;) ).

      Ubuntu is a great OS , is more ready than Windows for some people, is as ready as Windows for others , and will be ready in the future for others.


      --
      def greetings(x): return {'friend': 'Howdy', 'enemy': 'Dye [sic]'}.get(x, 'g0 4w4y, l4m0r')
    39. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed ubuntu for my grandma, the only slight issues were with the scanner (only terminal support) but i wrote a nice script which was easy as click on this for photo size and this for a4. She likes and uses ubuntu more than xp with all its crap installed her low end hardware could barly boot up with bloted AV and firewall. Ubuntu is ace, much better than XP.

    40. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think Ubuntu should have a popup for people not in the USA, to a site like Easy Ubuntu, so they can play MP3s, without editing files and manually downloading codecs. Really, Windows users don't have to do that, why should Linux users be inconvenienced?

    41. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > You seem to be complaining that they're not throwing away their trade secrets just for your benefit.

      I'm not complaining at all. I have no interest in using their crippled hardware.

      You, however, are complaining that Ubuntu doesn't ship the nVidia driver. This is due to nVidia's licensing problems, not because Ubuntu hates nVidia or something. So to make things easy for the end user, nVidia needs to do something, because nobody else has the legal authority over the issue.

      And why exactly does nVidia's driver contain "trade secrets", but Intel's doesn't? (And why should I care about nVidia's trade secrets. If that's their excuse, the end result is the same - I'm not going to buy their hardware.)

      --
      My other car is first.
    42. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He said,

      I'm pretty sure most of the codecs you need can be found in multiverse. without the need for installing .debs from some random guy with beer in the url.

    43. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's not ready for grandma to use,

      whoah... let's kill this "It's not ready for grandma to use" meme... I'm a grandparent and I have absolutely NO problems with Linux at all... If Grandma can follow a recipe in a recipe book, or follow a set of knitting instructions (and I'm pretty sure very few of you could), then she's perfectly capable of following the instructions for doing easyubuntu or automatix... although looking at Arnieboy's thread for automatix... even I'm confused... trying to work out where to start with it

      and the easy ubuntu page of instructions, while simple, fail to mention that you have to copy and paste each line at a time into a terminal... durr... come on guys... switch on... some people require very explicit step by step instructions to do this...

      mind you, recipe books assume a lot of basic knowledge and so do knitting patterns...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    44. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WindowsXP DOES come with MP3 support out of the box. It DOES come with "accelrated" nVidia and ATI drivers, which ARE updatable at Microsoft Update. If you want codecs, you download a codec pack (in a simple .exe setup format), and it installs everything you need (and regardless of what you guys think, it IS easier than running the EasyUbuntu script. No matter who's performing the system setup).

      I installed Dapper this week too, and that EasyUbuntu script is somewhat broken. Try to install Flash and/or Java, and the installer script's terminal window spits out a bunch of gibberish and the script can't complete.

      The other problem I've run into is mouse and keyboard configuration. I've got a Logitech MX1000 and the only buttons that work are left and right click. Scroll support was spotty. I had to browse through several useless google searches before trying to edit my xorg.conf file manually to switch the mouse driver to 'evdev'. Scrolling now works, but my fwd/back mouse buttons still don't work anywhere - Konqureror and Firefox still treat those buttons as a left-click. My keyboard's 'multimedia' buttons don't work either, nor my 'windows' key to access the KDE menu, I haven't even started to delve into that yet. Think 'grandma' will go through that after you install Ubuntu and give her the box to use?

    45. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is one of the things that has bugged me the most about Linux distros, but it's all as a result of software patents and copyrights, not a fault of the distros.

      On Ubuntu's site, there is an easy and excelent step-by-step walkthrough to get everything to work, as well as an explanation for why they legally cannot include that stuff in the core distro. RestrictedFormats. Another thing I had trouble with is getting midi to work (not sure why that didn't work out-of-the box, but Ubuntu's wiki had good instructions for getting midi files to work too. I downloaded the DVD iso and I must say, the install and desktop experience is the best I've had - Windows or Linux.

      They are also in the process of trying to reach a point of automation where getting everything working is as easy as possible while still complying with the law. See RestrictedFormatsProblem and RestrictedFormatsSolutions.

      And as always, if you want it done faster, feel free to lend them a hand. The solution you propose is being worked out and discussed; for starters you can look here. As far as the law goes, well, the congressional elections are coming soon (if you live in the US) so find out how your incumbent has been voting and get 'em out if you don't agree with how they've been voting on tech issues.

    46. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by DrXym · · Score: 0, Troll
      Their hardware isn't crippled. It works just fine on XP and Linux and is my card maker of choice. And if you bothered to read what I said, you would see that I'm not complaining that the driver doesn't ship with Ubuntu at all. I'm perfectly happy if it doesn't ship on the CD. But that's no reason that Ubuntu shouldn't detect and offer to install the driver for me afterwards. No reason at all.

      As for why Nvidia should contain trade secrets and Intels should not. Perhaps it's because Intel produces a mediocre integrated graphics chip for laptops and cheap PCs and certainly not something which is competing with Nvidia & ATI at the bleeding edge of graphics performance. If you don't want to buy a decent card then that's your business, but don't think for a second that your choice or your own lack of pragmatism should dictate what other people expect or want from their own systems.

    47. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Ok. In windows, grandma just double clicks a setup.exe which does all the work for her. If a similar application doesn't exist in the default Ubuntu repositories as a .deb package, then she's out of luck unless she knows how to ./configure ; make install.

      At least she can do that. Try doing that on Windows.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    48. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      My co-worker wasted a couple hours trying to install a second graphics card on Ubuntu, before inserting the card into a Windows machine and realizing that the card simply didn't work. IMO, that illustrates a significant reason to stay away from desktop Linux.

      Yes. That reason: your coworker should not be doing his own installs.

      I'm honestly not an elitist - I tease my coworkers about using Windows and they tease me about Linux, but it's all in fun. However, Linux tried for two hours to tell your pal that the graphics card didn't work, and he wasn't willing to believe it until Windows said the exact same thing. That doesn't indicate a flaw with either OS, but rather a serious problem with your coworker.

      Did he also get frustrated when Linux wasn't able to find his SCSI drives, and even more so when Windows confirmed that he only had IDE installed?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    49. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Alef · · Score: 1
      Yes these are the words, but what do they mean?

      I posted a link to an article titled "Ubuntu for your grandmother.", as a confirming example of the GGGGP's conjecture. It had nothing to do with codecs, .debs or beer.

    50. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      So.. you're saying you didn't READ the article? he has you download a .deb he made (or someone not even him) to get xine codecs. That the url happened to include the word "beer" in the domain name seemed funny to me.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    51. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Alef · · Score: 1
      I read it, although not too carefully (evidently), and it was a while ago. And it didn't seem to contain the word "codec" when I scanned it. But ok, point taken. =P

      Yes, you could probably do all that without downloading .debs - agreed. I read it more as an interesting anecdote rather than a tutorial, though.

    52. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! Is MS paying these people to write one post like this on every mention of linux progress anywhere?

      Yes, they are, and I appreciate the extra money. However, lately there's getting to be more work than I can handle.

      $incerely,
      A Nonymouse Fudd

    53. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      ... both of which are installation issues. I'm totally with you on out-of-the-box mp3 support. But the commenter is right: granny ain't installing Dapper Drake, XP, or Vista (whenever it comes). Might be time to retire that particular usability test.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    54. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      It's not ready for Grandma to use . . .

      Get her to talk to Joe Six-Pack. I got him set up yesterday.

    55. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I'm not asking them to distribute the stuff in the core distro. I'm asking that they offer to download and install it. i.e. offer to download and install the package from nvidia's home site. It's clear from the doc you supplied that most of the commercial but free things that people want are in the multiverse anyway, so why not have a post-install step that asks the user if they want commercial but free packages and then goes on to help them get them?

    56. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      I would disagree, i have endless troubles in ubuntu getting stuff installed, i never did get my radeon driver working despite following the instructions on help.ubuntu.com, i *did* manage to get read access to my windows drives, but it took a while. I couldn't give a crap about the "Useful software" that comes bundled with it, but it annoys the hell out of me that i can't get freaking pygame 1.7 running (this is probably the default in drake). Maybe better, maybe faster, maybe safer, but it's still not easier, unless all you do is play some music, email, browse the web and use open office.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    57. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by legirons · · Score: 1

      "I don't think grandma would do too well installing XP either."

      Grandma: Look! if you move the mouse, then the pointer on screen moves around!

      Windows XP installer: Please agree to the following 37-page contract

    58. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by legirons · · Score: 1

      "The vast majority of PC's that "Grandma" are using are Dell's, Compaq/HP's, Gateway's or Sony's These all come PRE-INSTALLED with MP3 Support, DVD Support, and Multimedia CODECS."

      Dell PCs also come preconfigured in such a way that they will be unusable within weeks due to virus activity (e.g. using Internet Explorer by default and no firewall) -- What was your point, that this is desirable for less-experienced computer users?

      p.s. my preinstalled Windows 2000 machine didn't play WMV files that Ubuntu had no trouble with. What were you saying about codecs?

    59. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      "Grandma" does not exist, so stop pulling her out.

      I think I've found my new slashdot sig.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    60. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      I'm talking about "Grandma" here. I doubt that she is concerned about Radeon drivers, and development libraries!

      By the way, I had problems with a Radeon 9200 too... it was unstable even under Windows. So I gave it to a friend and bought a nVidia card. Problem solved.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    61. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The *only* keystrokes required to install mp3, most video codecs, and nvidia drivers in Ubuntu 6.06 is your password. All the rest can be done with your mouse. Top menu bar - System - Administration - Synaptic Package Manager - password - Settings - Repositories - Add - put a tick in the universe and multiverse - add - repeat three times, but with Security Updates, Updates, and Backports selected from the drop down box - Close - Reload - close Synaptic. Top menu bar - Applications - Add/Remove... - check the 'show unsupported applications' and 'show commercial applications'. in Sound & Video you have the gstreamer plugins, java (and azureus), etc. easy to install. If you need binary video drivers, they can be found back in synaptic. Only time a keyboard was needed was for the password. Overall the number of mouse clicks about the same as windows, and a whole lot less typing to install a bunch of video codecs, java, and video drivers (and any other software from the thousands long list).

    62. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by brainee28 · · Score: 1
      My point to the original poster was that he was complaining about the lack of MP3, DVD Playback, and multimedia codecs in Ubuntu without installing them directly, then saying that XP comes with all of that.

      XP comes with it because Dell and other PC mfg's install it before the user gets it. The comparison is not the same. If the original poster were to do parallel installs of Ubuntu and XP, he'd find that XP doesn't come with these built in either. He would have to go find them, just like he would with Ubuntu.

      I was also mentioning that his use of the "Grandma" standard wasn't correct because "Grandma" wouldn't be doing a from scratch reinstall, the Geek Squad, CompUSA, or a relative with computer experience would be.

      Hope that clears it up for you.

    63. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet. by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about grandma, that's my point.... I'm talking about me, i'm not overly intelligent, but nothing in windows is too hard, and i can't get ubuntu to do stuff i want it to do no matter how much time i throw at it. Don't get me wrong, i'll make it dance eventually, but it's going to be a hard slog, i know that and i'd just like other people to be aware that whatever the benefits, linux is still hard. as a matter of fact i'm in ubuntu drake right now and it appears that pygame has been pulled from the repository altogether.... sigh.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  9. Me experiences by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Informative
    I just finished spending about 3 hours on a test install on my IBM Thinkpad notebook.

    In a nutshell:

    • install was flawless. Very clean, very fast. I like the LIve CD initial install, then the icon to do the full install.
    • apps install were a good selection, not the usual Linux overwhelming "install all apps I can find". Organization of the apps on the menus was nice.
    • I like the admin capability, instead of having to bounce to root when I want to do something. Much more thought out than Microsoft Vista's harassing UAC.
    • wireless support was lacking. It saw my Atheros 802.11abg PC Card, but could not do anything with it. I could not connect to my wireless network, even when I cycled security down to 'no security', i.e., it could not connect to a wide open access point.
    • I tried to send a test page to a network printer (a share on a Windows box) , and the whole notebook hung solid. Power-down required to get it moving again.

    So overall, I'd say, "excellent" on the visuals, apps choices, functionality (so long as wireless networking or network printers are not needed).

    IMO, desktop users will be happy. Notebook users will be less than happy.

    1. Re:Me experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much more thought out than Microsoft Vista's harassing UAC.

      I take it you've actually used it then?

      Oh.

      I didn't think so.

    2. Re:Me experiences by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      Isn't the ability to print and get on a wireless somewhat important for a desktop computer?

      Not quite sure why you gave it 'excellent' when those important things didn't even work.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    3. Re:Me experiences by Junta · · Score: 4, Informative

      -Wireless support:
      Funny thing there, install networkmanager (and probably the gnome applet to go with it) and a great deal of the complexity goes down. It's surprisingly easy. At least with my ipw chipset. It configured things for WPA or WEP or wide open. It lacks LEAP support and therefore I couldn't use just that and had to do more advanced things, but if you just need wide open, WEP, and WPA support it will make configuring the wireless Windows-easy.

      -Remote print support:
      I recently wrestled with printing to a windows desktop system with attached printer, but the bad side effect wasn't as you described. In my case, the target windows Box print queue would hang, requiring restart of the windows print spool service. The workaround was to disable bidirectional support under the ports tab of the printer tab on the windows box. At least in my case with an hp printer/hpijs, you can't do the bidirectional support on a windows server, but hplip would support it locally, but that won't help to access a windows printer.

      So wireless support they left out the thing that makes it much easier by default (don't understand why), and with that it would have been very nearly perfect there.

      Print support to a Windows shared printer was quite evil and obscure google searches were required to figure it out. It was nothing that Ubuntu itself could have done much about, since HPLIP doesn't support remote printing, and HPIJS supports remote printing, but not the bidirectional features. Add to that the only work around is a server-side print config change. However, I imagine this to be a fairly frequent for Ubuntu users and probably should be documented somewhere prominent.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Me experiences by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      [typical geek response]Why would anyone want to do that?[/typical geek response]

    5. Re:Me experiences by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      I take it you've actually used [Vista] then?

      Yes, I have used it. Lots of others have have used it are also complaining about this particular feature called UAC.

    6. Re:Me experiences by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your comment. I've not given up on it yet. I'll try to locate the networkmanager and see how that goes.

    7. Re:Me experiences by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Do print and connect to wireless networks on my Windows computer, I need to visit canon.co.uk and netgear.com, download the drivers and install them, or dig out the driver CDs from my collection of CDs.

    8. Re:Me experiences by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Printing should never lock the whole system, ever. I encourage you to debug it a bit and submit a bug report if you find it's some software. If it's some hardware, that'd be an interesting story.

    9. Re:Me experiences by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Wireless and printing on a Windows network both work flawlessly for me. I'm using Ubuntu 6.06 on an Inspiron 8600. My Intel Wifi card worked automagically, as did locating a printer on the Windows network. I didn't even have to install a driver -- Ubuntu already had a postscript driver for the HP LJ4000 I wanted to print to.

    10. Re:Me experiences by timelady · · Score: 1

      its the atheros firmware shipped with dapper. its a bug, fix here: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux -source-2.6.15/+bug/30766

      --
      Nothing - well thats something.
    11. Re:Me experiences by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      I don't see the point. Just becuase someone doesn't say that Linux is the Second Coming doesn't mean that they are pro-Microsoft. In fact I said nothing about Windows at all.

      This is about Ubuntu. Not Windows.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    12. Re:Me experiences by bscunha · · Score: 1

      I have a M45 Toshiba Satellite, and everything is working perfectly, including wireless.

      Haven't tested firewire, SD Reader and DVD recording.

      Great job!

    13. Re:Me experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point was that just like Windows, he needed to get the appropriate tools to make it happen.

      In Windows drivers are needed to be installed before printing and wireless work properly. Similar deal with Ubuntu. Need to get the appropriate tools to make it happen.

    14. Re:Me experiences by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      Why bring up Windows at all?

      It's just a red herring.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    15. Re:Me experiences by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      wireless card recognised but not working eh, sounds familiar. basically whats happened is the kernal has support built in for your wireless card but coz of 'restrictions' can't actually ship with the driver.

      http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=1071920&m ode=linear

      that should do the trick
      (breezy you used the ndiswrapper to use the windows driver)

    16. Re:Me experiences by legirons · · Score: 1

      "I just finished spending about 3 hours on a test install on my IBM Thinkpad notebook."

      I installed Ununtu Breezy on a thinkpad a few weeks ago, and it took maybe 10 minutes + time to download updates. Probably the easiest OS installation I've seen (and that's comparing it to quite a few competitors)

      The thing I don't get is how you can download a 400MB CD, install it, and then it requires more than 400MB of software updates... (this isn't just a Linux problem b.t.w. - my Mac OS requires so many updates that I can't afford to download them all (would take about 20 days of continuous downloading to get the Mac up-to-date))

  10. This is useless by MoogMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but you cannot review a whole operating system in two days. Sure, you can get the immediate "ease of use" and an idea of the speed of things. But it's only when you start using it properly every day for at least a month or more, you can appreciate whether an Operating System is good for you, or not.

    Saying that, Ubuntu already won me over at Breezy. With the new Gnome 2.14, Dapper is much faster again.

  11. A milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been checking on Kubuntu for about a year now. I always said Kubuntu is not yet but has great potential. That was mainly because of the work that has already been done and the resources FOSS makes available. Add to that the a rich guy and you get the great potential. I used to throw away the CD I burnt but yesterday was the first time I was not disappointed with it and I even went ahead and installed on one of the desktops I have. Draper Drake is a milestone to Ubuntu and Linux. Great distro over all. It is clean, fast, reliable and robust. I think it will be the envy of many including MS.

    1. Re:A milestone by mrraven · · Score: 1

      I agree. It will do 90% of what either my OS X or XP computers will do. It's not there for games compared to the XP side or media like video editing or audio editing compared to OS X. On the other hand it installed and detected video, sound, and mouse a first for Linux for me. I am able to e-mail, chat, edit and search photos (Picassa makes a good addition if you aren't an OSS zealot), surf the web with Firefox do word processing (I added Abiword for a faster word processor), and listen to networked music served from itunes to rhythm box over SSH. I went ahead and did easy Ubuntu to install video and audio codecs, and installed Real Player and Acrcobat Reader (again not a purist). I also enabled the kbuntu-desktop with the package installer, so I could use Konqueer and other KDE apps easily, In sum I think it's leaped over XP for everyday use (at least for a moderate geek) and is nipping at the heels of OS X, good job Ubuntu folks.

      --
      Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
    2. Re:A milestone by mrraven · · Score: 1

      p.s. package manager Synaptic typing from my G5 box now.

      --
      Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
  12. Slashdotted already? by Toaste · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Coral cache doesn't work for me, but mirrordot seems to be up: http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/302b35ab712e9490f baecdbdf6fe55e3/index.html

    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, coral was giving me 500/503 error and the pages themselves are /.ed...
      Is it possible that coral is also /.ed?

      Also, how do we get mirrordot to mirror page 2 and page 3?

  13. Good, but... by freakified · · Score: 3, Informative

    While Ubuntu is, IMO, the best Linux distribution out there, it still has issues. For example, I noticed that, in that default installation, there is a boot option for "Recovery Console," which simply gives anyone who starts it root access to the computer without a password. While it can be disabled by editing a configuration file, something like that should never have been added in the first place.

    Also, after installing Dapper on my computer in one location and then moving to another network, my ability to use DHCP suddenly disappeared! I'm sure I can get it back, by Mac OS X and XP didn't give me any trouble. (Though, to give credit where credit is due, XP died completely, because of a hardware upgrade, which, didn't affect Dapper at all.)

    All in all, though, not to be overly negative, I recently set up Dapper on a school development computer and got Apache, PHP, PostgreSQL, and SSH working in a matter of minutes, so, to the developers of Ubuntu, kudos.

    1. Re:Good, but... by smash · · Score: 4, Informative
      While it could be seen as a security "issue" - there's nothing to stop someone booting a knoppix CD, linux boot floppy or any other number of options to get root on a Linux machine they have physical access to.

      If you're paranoid about your users getting root on the box, physically secure it for a start and deny them shutdown permission (to reboot to the boot menu) you'd be better off...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Good, but... by Poppler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For example, I noticed that, in that default installation, there is a boot option for "Recovery Console," which simply gives anyone who starts it root access to the computer without a password. While it can be disabled by editing a configuration file, something like that should never have been added in the first place.

      I don't love that, but it's not a big deal for most people. It's certainly not something that should prohibit average desktop users from running Ubuntu. Try holding Apple-S during boot on your OS X machine sometime, it does the same thing.
      Besides, if someone really wants your data and has physical access to your unencrypted hard drive, you're screwed anyway.

      --
      What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
    3. Re:Good, but... by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1
      . For example, I noticed that, in that default installation, there is a boot option for "Recovery Console," which simply gives anyone who starts it root access to the computer without a password.

      or he could press e on an option, and specify init=/bin/sh or similar, and boot up directly in a shell. This works on every distro, unless you lock your grub menu.

      Repeat after me: if untrustworthy people have physical access to your box, your security by login is basically gone. If you want to secure your data in that scenario, use an encrypted fs.

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    4. Re:Good, but... by jrockway · · Score: 1
      > For example, I noticed that, in that default installation, there is a boot option for "Recovery Console," which simply gives anyone who starts it root access to the computer without a password.

      Are you sure about that? On Debian, upon which Ubuntu is based, you get this message when you boot to single user mode:


      Give root password for maintenance
      (or type Control-D to continue):


      If you don't know the root password, you're not going to get a root shell; it's that simple.
      --
      My other car is first.
    5. Re:Good, but... by cortana · · Score: 1

      In Ubuntu, the root password does not have a password by default*; therefore it makes sense to just drop straight to a shell.

      * I don't mean you can log on or 'su' with no password, etc. I mean that there is no password in /etc/shadow, therefore nothing supplied by the user will ever hash to a matching value, therefore root can never log on. Same as how the other system users with no passwords (daemon, bin, nobody, etc.) work.

    6. Re:Good, but... by jambarama · · Score: 1

      Just like Cmd-S on a Mac or recovery mode on Ubuntu - on Windows press F8 on Windows and boot into "Safe Mode". Instant "Administrator" access - no password needed. Not to mention you are getting a gui which makes it a whole heck of a lot easier to hose a system or swipe stuff if you want.

      Even better boot into "Safe Mode with Networking". Networking gives you access to the internet and any trojans you can find, or storage space you can access. Nice eh?

      "But it is harder to find!" you cry. Of course it is - IF YOU'VE NEVER USED WINDOWS XP! If anyone has local access to a machine and wants to get in, they know this trick And I dare say editing grub.conf is a lot easier than editing the registry or running a vbs file.

    7. Re:Good, but... by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      For example, I noticed that, in that default installation, there is a boot option for "Recovery Console," which simply gives anyone who starts it root access to the computer without a password.


      Okay, so do this from GRUB, on any distribution:
      1. Highlight the kernel you would like to boot
      2. Press e, space, type "init=/bin/bash" without the quotes, press enter twice.
      3. When the kernel has finished booting, do "mount / -o remount,rw".
      4. passwd / rm -rf / echo "This machine just got owned." >> /etc/motd

      Repeat after me: With physical access, there will never be security

      --
      toresbe
    8. Re:Good, but... by smash · · Score: 1
      Does not stop someone booting from floppy (or even LILO prompt - not sure if GRUB supports options, I hate it and haven't bothered learning it, since i'm more interested in BSD these days) and doing init=/bin/sh

      If you want a secure machine, you need to deny users physical access to it, or encrypt the filesystem.

      Neither of which is done by any linux distribution yet, to my knowledge...

      Note that this isn't a problem simply relegated to Ubuntu, or even just Linux - Windows NT/XP, FreeBSD, etc are all in the same boat here AFAIK...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  14. MEPIS: (K)Ubuntu with codecs by rbrander · · Score: 5, Informative

    Probably the two biggest issues that many have with Ubuntu are that it takes extra work to install MP3 support - not to mention every other codec or player.

    MEPIS has recently confirmed the fears of some that Ubuntu is turning into a platform, displacing Debian itself...MEPIS is/was a KDE desktop based on Debian. The founder's concern with the stability and reliability of the Debian base recently led him to base his distro on Ubuntu sources instead.

    So now with MEPIS, you get Ubuntu, except that it's KDE default, and it comes with every player (Real, Quicktime) and codec plugin for Kaffeine that can be found. Plus, the general layout of menus and the installer have won good reviews all around.

    They're currently a week into beta4 on the new version based on the Dapper base and will likely have an RC1 out by mid-June.

    1. Re:MEPIS: (K)Ubuntu with codecs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So now with MEPIS, you get Ubuntu, except that it's KDE default, and it comes with every player (Real, Quicktime) and codec plugin for Kaffeine that can be found.

      And all those are compatible with the GPL license?

    2. Re:MEPIS: (K)Ubuntu with codecs by cquark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ubuntu doesn't incorporate MP3 and other codecs as part of the distribution because of legal issues, but you can install support for MP3s and most of the other software you want that's excluded with a few clicks of the mouse by using EasyUbuntu.

    3. Re:MEPIS: (K)Ubuntu with codecs by jonathansizz · · Score: 1

      But Mepis is the most amateurish distro I've ever tried - all the menus are ugly as hell, and full of spelling mistakes; it's embarrassing, frankly.

    4. Re:MEPIS: (K)Ubuntu with codecs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at first thought, you sound like someone who just had their g/f called ugly to their face.

      on second thought, i might have just mised all those spelling errors that you are talking about during my last 6 onths using - and liking - mepis.

      so, put up and i won't think you to be a lying a loser who has their favorite distro confused with the concept of a g/f, alrighty?

    5. Re:MEPIS: (K)Ubuntu with codecs by Respect_my_Authority · · Score: 1

      >> MEPIS has recently confirmed the fears of some that Ubuntu is turning into a platform, displacing Debian itself...MEPIS is/was a KDE desktop based on Debian. The founder's concern with the stability and reliability of the Debian base recently led him to base his distro on Ubuntu sources instead.

      A slight correction: MEPIS has never been based on Debian Stable, it was based on Debian Testing/Unstable. And the MEPIS founder was never concerned with the stability and reliability of Debian. The actual concern that Warren Woodford expressed was that Debian Testing was changing too fast for MEPIS to keep up with it!

      The stable release of Debian 3.1 (codenamed Sarge) was delayed several times and these delays practically stalled the development in Debian's development branches, Unstable and Testing. After Sarge was released, development in Debian Unstable and Testing was back to full speed again. Several large-scale upgrades on the Debian base system followed one after another. MEPIS just couldn't cope with all these changes.

      Now, just one year after the Sarge release, Debian Testing is just as up-to-date as Ubuntu Dapper. And Debian Unstable is more up-to-date than Ubuntu.

      For those who don't know yet: Debian has two development branches -- called Unstable and Testing. When new packages are introduced, they first go to Unstable. If no release critical bugs have been found within ten days or so, the packages are moved from Unstable to Testing. Stable Debian releases are made from the Testing branch by freezing it for a while and making it go through some extra bug-fixing and polishing.

      The packages in a stable Debian release don't get any version upgrades, only security updates. In contrast to this, the Testing and Unstable branches are upgraded all the time when new versions of different programs are packaged and added to Debian repositories. The Unstable and Testing branches of Debian are usually more up-to-date than Ubuntu's stable releases.

      I have a desktop system that tracks Debian's Testing branch and sometimes I pull a couple of packages from Unstable to stay on the cutting edge. This kind of Debian installation suits my needs better than Ubuntu. Debian's advantages when compared to Ubuntu are newer software, better quality control, and security support for ALL the packages in Debian Testing (while the official Ubuntu Security Team doesn't support "universe" & "multiverse" packages or Ubuntu backports at all).

    6. Re:MEPIS: (K)Ubuntu with codecs by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Probably the two biggest issues that many have with Ubuntu are that it takes extra work to install MP3 support - not to mention every other codec or player."

      If the MP3 designers had wanted their format to be included in Ubuntu, then they shouldn't have patented it!

      Really, it's silly to request government protection and monopoly powers on an algorithm, then complain when people have trouble legally distributing it...

  15. But there are so many bugs...! by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    For a release that was deleyed to make everything smooth and working as expected, I find that there are so many bugs! Not that I do not epect any bugs at all, but their number is so great.

    Just have a lookat those assigned to the Kubuntu team...

    https://launchpad.net/people/kubuntu-team/+assigne dbugs?start=0&batch=75

    1. Re:But there are so many bugs...! by miscz · · Score: 0

      Bugs, bugs, bugs, I can't get enough of them. On my fresh Dapper install a lot of stuff is just broken. The worst part about this is the fact that devs knew about this before the release and yet they decided to ignore this and fix it later even though they could release it on 30.6.2006 without breaking promises. For example, Azureus is completly broken , Krusader crashes all the time, smb/nfs/ssh over Nautilus is very unstable, video playback on many Intel integrated graphics is oversaturated... I could go on. Dapper was released too early. I wonder why did they release a RC version if they didn't care about fixing anything.

    2. Re:But there are so many bugs...! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Informative

      The odd thing is most of those were kde specific bugs.

      I remember reading at the last minute that Ubuntu decided to add kde 3.5.1 and xorg7.1. Both are only a week or two old. Bad decision. :-(

      Ubuntu is much larger than kubuntu so they probably ignored the kde bugs as most of them used gnome.

      I find it disturbing but sadly these days all the distro's have these bugs. I found the livecd less buggy then suse's or knoppix so far.

      But I need XP for school this summer and I will wait until next fall to install Ubuntu with kde. By then it should be more baked with less bugs.

      I have been lucky in seeing no bugs at all besides my touchpad being too sensitive. I am sure I can configure that in XOrg.conf when I eventual decide to install it later.

    3. Re:But there are so many bugs...! by jrockway · · Score: 0, Troll

      > Not that I do not epect any bugs at all, but their number is so great.

      So quit whining and start fixing them.

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:But there are so many bugs...! by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      So quit whining and start fixing them.

      That reply is as annoying as the original whine.

      Not everybody is a coder, much less for a product that is "shipping".

    5. Re:But there are so many bugs...! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Then pay someone to fix them. Complaining solves nothing.

      --
      My other car is first.
  16. Re:real good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    New software is released and the review linked to from /.

    Commenter says new software has a show-stopping deficiency.

    This gets moderated off-topic?

  17. Easy Dual Boot Install by d3ik · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a Windows user who's been looking at Ubuntu for awhile. I had tried Fedora and Mandrake in the past, but I just wasn't impressed enough to switch.

    All I have to say is: wow! I burned the 'Desktop' CD, booted it up on my Thinkpad R52, and was able to play around in the OS to get familiar with the environment. Once I was satisfied that everything was running smooth (it saw all of my devices, including wireless, with no problem) all I had to do was click on the 'Install' icon on the desktop.

    The installer itself was excellent. Like I said having installed other distros in the past this graphical install *in a desktop environment* was excellent. The part that I had dreaded the most was setting up dual boot (I already had XP installed). The installer saw the XP partition (NTFS) and allowed me to resize it and install Ubuntu in the newly freed space (and automatically installed GRUB). This was absolutely beautiful functionality, and I think it will really make a great transitional tool for migrating us lame Windows users over to Linux.

  18. Impressive by ditoa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a [very] long term Windows user and Windows Admin for a large corporation witl 100,000+ desktops. I love Windows. It is a superb operating system for a corporate environment. Sure it can be a pain in the arse because of updates but its ability to be centrally managed, etc is awesome. There is nothing else that can compete with it on an enterprise level, not even the stunning OS X 10.4. However Ubuntu 6.06 is an incredible operating system. While I am a Windows user I have a lot of respect for a lot of other operating systems. Linux being one of them. Ubuntu is probably the most professional release I have ever used. It installed without a hitch on my 6 months old IBM test workstation. I am very very impressed and I take my hat off to the Ubuntu team. The delay was worth it. Easily. They [the Ubuntu team] have done an incredible job and you have to respect that. I could easily give a Ubuntu system to a new computer user and they be able to learn how to use it for general tasks just as fast as a Windows system. You only have to go to the terminal as much as you need to go to the registry in Windows so it isn't really a battle on ease of use anymore. Ubuntu has brought Linux on par with Windows in that regard. Ubuntu just need to push on hardware support so that if it fails it fails gracfully. X server critical errors need to be replaced with a more graceful drop down to 800x600z256 colours similar to what Windows does. Also the most important thing to get working (other than the graphical interface) is the network. Once you have the network up and running you can get any other driver you need to. Ubuntu worked fine with my network card but I know that it isn't perfect from reports I have read online. I hope that this is fixed in the next release (7.01?). In a nutshell. SUPERB.

    1. Re:Impressive by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that despite the fact that Ubuntu will bomb completely out to a text prompt if the video isn't supported, its just as good as Windows?

      Dude, its 2006. A non-GUI operating system, or an OS that can't manage a GUI when needed, is pretty much going to be ignored by everyone.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:Impressive by octopus72 · · Score: 1

      So what? It is more useful to have xorg log output and text mode than a 256 colour 800x600 desktop.
      In linux: it is all about changing /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
      In windows: it is reasonable to have GUI failsafe because you won't edit registry or display settings in CLI.

    3. Re:Impressive by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Needing to edit Xorg.conf just to get a GUI up is a retarded premise, if, in 2006, you expect people to take the OS seriously. If it wont INSTALL and at least fire up on the reboot, people will dismiss it out of hand, and rightly so, as poorly packaged software.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    4. Re:Impressive by smash · · Score: 1
      Not ensuring your hardware is compatible before installing an operating system is retarded, I think you mean.

      Windows OR Linux.

      I can go try install Windows XP on a Sparc, and then bitch that it's 2006 and why doesn't it boot, if you like.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    5. Re:Impressive by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      No, this has nothing to do with architecture. For 99% of the users out there who even have a choice about software, IT or no, there is only One True Architecture, and that is x86. Look at a large bank for instance. It's either AIX on POWER, z/OS on the z90, or Windows on x86.

      If you seek to woo away the Windows users, you better make sure that your distribution can stumble along to a stock VGA mode GUI, at least until you can get updated drivers on the box.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    6. Re:Impressive by smash · · Score: 1
      Whilst I agree with you that "the" architecture is currently x86, that wasn't my point.

      Anyone seriously considering Linux (or ANY O/S for that matter) in a business environment is going to check compatibility with their hardware, or order hardware with Linux compatibility as a requirement.

      For people in a home-use environment, is checking for hardware compatibility too much to ask?

      I can dig out "problem" hardware with Windows XP as well if you like. Perhaps one of the myriad of SCSI controllers that requires a vendor driver before the system will even install? Perhaps a quad CPU box (which AMD seem to be releasing real soon now)?

      Chasing a moving hardware platform for 100% compatibility with zero issues in unrealistic. Hence, bitching about hardware issues that are either easily solved (eg, take *some* of your vista upgrade money and invest in a compatible video card) and/or affect a small number of users is not really something to worry about too much.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    7. Re:Impressive by ditoa · · Score: 1

      Windows doesn't claim to support SPARC. It supports x86 (and AMD64 but I won't go there this post). And I bet I could give you a month of Sunday's and you wouldn't find a system that Windows couldn't get a GUI working on. If the Windows developers can why can't the Xorg developers? They have done some incredible things recently so I am sure they could get it working at 640x480x256. The problem with all Linux distros is that it isn't always that easy to find out if your hardware is supported. Sometimes it is hit and miss. Sometimes you are not 100% what chipset your integrated NIC is using or similar. If you want to be taken seriously you need to be serious about getting the system working on as much hardware as possible.

  19. Re:(OT) Recommend a decent domain registrar? by XanC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I like dyndns.org. I used their free domain service, and then when I started needing to register real domains, I stuck with them. Their target is tech-heads, not morons like the rest of them.

  20. Good for desktops, bad for certain laptops. by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 5, Informative

    On May 29th, two days before release, an ATI bug was introduced via the xorg driver that makes Dapper unstable on certain ATI based systems. In my own case this means that my G4 is now unusable. Just as a reminder, if you think you might be affected, don't upgrade.

    Just for reference, the forum post and the bug report.

    --

    What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    1. Re:Good for desktops, bad for certain laptops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for not having backups, dummy. Regardless, apt will let you downgrade.

    2. Re:Good for desktops, bad for certain laptops. by dodongo · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's bad for desktops, too. R2x0 chips on the desktop were affected in a different way when using the fglrx driver. I'm amazed at how fuX0r3d the ATI driver set became, and how quickly it went to being a mess.

      FWIW, this isn't just mindless bitching on my part; I'm subscribed to the relevant bugs and have confirmed not only a bug but also a fix (to the fglrx bug in question).

      These bugs are grave enough that I have no doubt the Ubuntu folks, with our help, will work on getting the regressions fixed.

    3. Re:Good for desktops, bad for certain laptops. by zx-15 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the world of pain.
      After I upgraded my fedora core 4 to fedora core 5 on my Radeon 7000/VE I could not get dual head working and ended up swithching to debian testing, where I can safely use xorg 6.8.2 ( the last xorg version that worked propertly with my video card)

    4. Re:Good for desktops, bad for certain laptops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dumbfuck, you seem to know a lot about rake sodomy. Regardless, the quote "In my own case this means that my G4 is now unusable" shows a propensity to hyperbole.

  21. They CAN'T "rethink" MP3! by babbling · · Score: 1

    No matter how much Ubuntu wants to put in MP3 support, they can't! It's patented. That means they're not allowed to, without paying license fees. License fees for patents are usually based on how many people are using the product, but Ubuntu don't know about every deployment because they allow free distribution of the OS.

    Of course Ubuntu would have support for MP3 if they were allowed to!

    1. Re:They CAN'T "rethink" MP3! by Andrew+Tanenbaum · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, they can. Fluendo, the makers of GStreamer, paid for a license. Canonical could include the GStreamer plugin binary legally, but because of Canonical's ideology, they won't, because the license wouldn't apply if a user recompiled it from source ----- yet they still include nVidia and ATI binary drivers, where a user can't recompile them at all.

    2. Re:They CAN'T "rethink" MP3! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Do people even use mp3 anymore? My music collection is all Ogg/FLAC and most people I know (that have Macs) use mp4. mp3 has no technical advantages, and it's not even legal to use freely, so why all the fuss on slashdot about using it?

      --
      My other car is first.
  22. Xubuntu by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More importantly (for me), the first official release of Xubuntu (Xfce) is out.

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    1. Re:Xubuntu by call_me_al · · Score: 1

      Xubuntu has some issues for me: * Opening Menu Editor wipes all menu items. * Have been unable to get printing working. Think this is also a major with Kubuntu. http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2064

  23. Re:real good by mycall · · Score: 1

    Good try. "Ubuntu 6.06 Reviewed" is the title of this article. That was my own review of Ubuntu 6.06.

  24. Gnome is unusable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I had to setup a linux machine recently for someone who isn't very familiar with unix. He is however a very smart guy, and isn't afraid to poke around and try to figure things out. He needed to fix some ugly output from a gps device, so he learned a little awk to write an awk script to do it.

    He couldn't use gnome. Even the simplest things are painfully awkward and obtuse. Just putting a link to a windows share on his desktop was a chore. We ran into stupid little problems like that over and over for 3 days. Then I installed KDE for him and switched him to that. All the things he had trouble with and needed me to help in gnome worked just fine for him on his own in KDE.

    1. Re:Gnome is unusable. by gimpimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you and your friend musn't be very experienced users then, as the ui for adding a windows share is very intuitive - where else would be be but the 'Places' menu? it's one click away.

      --
      i wish i was but oh well
    2. Re:Gnome is unusable. by 13bPower · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I just tried this to see if it was that hard. Go to the places menu, hit network servers, browse to wherever, drag the share to the desktop. Thats all I did and it seems to work. The thing wiith gnome that I am learning is drag and drop everything. I couldn't figure out how to send someone a picture in gAIM because there were no menu options for it, but all you gotta do is drag the file to the chat window and it works.

    3. Re:Gnome is unusable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That copies it to the desktop.

    4. Re:Gnome is unusable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't a very experienced reader are you? Its not accessing the share that is the problem. Its creating a link to it on the desktop. Although the fact that it has no "domain" field isn't terribly friendly either.

    5. Re:Gnome is unusable. by 13bPower · · Score: 1

      so? whats the difference? I just tryed it with middle click and choosing link here and you're right, that doesn't work.

    6. Re:Gnome is unusable. by smash · · Score: 1
      I couldn't figure out how to send someone a picture in gAIM because there were no menu options for it, but all you gotta do is drag the file to the chat window and it works.

      Ahhh the irony :D

      I'm not going to go off on a Gnome bashing spree - but there's so much crap like that, that is just so non-intuitive and awkward to use for someone who has a clue, that I've honestly given up hope.

      With KDE, on the other hand, I am continually discovering stuff that makes me go "wow, that's cool", and makes me work more effectively...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  25. 2 big improvements in Dapper for me by Chiisu · · Score: 1

    1. It automatically boots, meaning I don't have to worry about switching things in the BIOS in order for my usb keyboard to work w/ the installation program
    2. Finally, my wireless network interface works out of the box! All I had to do was activate it and it was up and running.

  26. Atheros worked for me by Josh · · Score: 1

    I installed from a beta version of the dapper release about a week ago. The machine used has an atheros wireless card in it and no other networking. The install preview had me up and connected to the internet through my wireless router without asking me anything. The install to hard disk did the same with a few non-techy questions like what did I want to call my machine, etc.

    1. Re:Atheros worked for me by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      The machine used has an atheros wireless card in it and no other networking. The install preview had me up and connected to the internet through my wireless router without asking me anything.

      Did it guess your SSID and access password, or did you have to tell it those items? :)

      My home wireless uses WPA2, and I did not know that ubuntu doesn't support that until after I got it installed. WPA2 may have confused the install routines.

    2. Re:Atheros worked for me by timelady · · Score: 1
      --
      Nothing - well thats something.
    3. Re:Atheros worked for me by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the pointer. It does look like it may solve my problem, however I really want this to "just work" without having to know about kernels and firmware and etc. In most other areas Ubuntu is spot on -- very clean, very solid. Wireless still needs some work.

  27. Automatix and Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The codecs and the rest of the "illegal in USA" things are quickly installed with Automatix. Also for KDE you could install Kubuntu.

  28. Dapper Drake has very good laptop support by LM741N · · Score: 1

    Hi all,

    I just bought an Acer 5670 Aspire laptop. I had to install the Dapper Drake beta initially as the ATI Radion X1400 high end card wasn't supported by Breezy Badger. The particular Broadcom ethernet wasn't supported either by Breezy Badger. But with the new version, everything works very well.

    After hacking FreeBSD and other Linux distros for years I got into a mode where I "just wanted to use" a computer and not have to be continually fooling with it to get an OS and apps to work. Ubuntu has been the perfect solution for achieving that goal. A job very well done!

    Thanks guys!

  29. MP3 in Free Distros by xenocide2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fundamnetal problem is that MP3s are patented. As long as Ubuntu is dedicated to giving out free and liberated software, they'll be at odds with the patent holders who hold the right ensure that neither of those goals is possible. Recently there have been attempts to work within the patent holder's framework to provide something legal and acceptable, but the closest we have is Fluendo's licencing program, which explicitly doesn't allow for redistribution, one of the key things in the GPL's operation. For example, Ubuntu can mail you a 6.06 CD containing the mp3 plugin, but it's legally questionable for you to redistribute those CDs to your friends. And MEPIS would certainly be in trouble, unless they also secured such a contract. Ubuntu represents it's distro as a "people should be able to modify and share changes" aka a Free Software distro. This contract goes against this ideal, and if MEPIS isn't aware of this contract, and chooses to modify Ubuntu in other ways, then Ubuntu's exposed the people they told could modify the software, people like they guy behind MEPIS, to hidden legal liabilities.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

    1. Re:MP3 in Free Distros by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      >>Ubuntu represents it's distro as a "people should be able to modify and share changes"
      No, it's not quite like that, the packages that are covered by GPL have that condition, the distro as a whole doesn't. Mepis by the way takes packages and change them not the whole K/Ubuntu, it's concievable that it uses special packages not covered by GPL where there's a need.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    2. Re:MP3 in Free Distros by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The issue is about mp3s and other codecs covered by copyrights and/or patents. Mepis ships them, but they are a reletively small company. If somebody sues Mepis for copyright or patent infringment, what will they get? Not, much, it is a one man show. If somebody sues Canoncial and/or Mark Shuttleworth, on the otherhand, well there is a whole lot more money to be made and therefore they are a much more likely target.

    3. Re:MP3 in Free Distros by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      I don't think they do anything illegal, for example they don't distribute w32codecs. Not sure how they do the mp3 thing. The rest of the issues were more ideological than anything, for example there's nothing that stops Linux distros to install Flash and Java. In some cases there's the need of permission from the company, I'm sure Mepis got that.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    4. Re:MP3 in Free Distros by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MP3s are patented and licensed. The fact that the legal rights aren't normally enforced doesn't mean they couldn't be enforced (and have been in the past). That is the same reason that there are not any "free" (as in beer or anything else) dvd players in linux. As for Java and Flash, you are correct that they are free to distribute, even though they are not free software.

      I do believe that with Sun's change to the Java license that it is supposed to be included in the next version of Ubuntu. The change came too late for the 6.06 release.

      As for Flash and Java on Windows XP and OS X, I thought that you had to install them manually, too. They aren't included with the OS (unless the hardware vendor pre-installs them).

    5. Re:MP3 in Free Distros by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From the Ubuntu front page:
      "The Ubuntu community is built on the ideas enshrined in the Ubuntu Philosophy: that software should be available free of charge, that software tools should be usable by people in their local language and despite any disabilities, and that people should have the freedom to customise and alter their software in whatever way they see fit.

      These freedoms make Ubuntu fundamentally different from traditional proprietary software: not only are the tools you need available free of charge, you have the right to modify your software until it works the way you want it to."
      emphasis added

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    6. Re:MP3 in Free Distros by filmnorthflorida · · Score: 1

      well, at least for os x, the hardware vendor *is* the os vendor, and they certainly do include java and flash in the base distribution. in fact, if you buy os x on cd in a store it includes java and flash. is this actually not true of windows? i'd be surprised.

      --
      --- php: perl hates people
    7. Re:MP3 in Free Distros by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      You would be surprised then. But Windows does ship .Net. As for Os X. I went back and checked, and you are correct, it ships with Java, but it is old, which is understandable since is was current when the CDs were pressed. So, while it is correct that it ships with java and flash, you still have to install current versions.

  30. Business card? by misleb · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if there has a business card/netinst ISO? I always liked how I didn't have to download a whole Debian ISO to install. I could just get the base install and the the rest over the net with apt-get. I never was much for selecting everything I want all at once. I like to install ONLY what I need, as I need it.

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    1. Re:Business card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can basically do the same thing. Do a server install. Gets you up and running with a minimal system. Then you can apt-get your to your hearts desire.

    2. Re:Business card? by ladoga · · Score: 1

      I like to install ONLY what I need, as I need it.

      Why not use Debian testing/unstable then?

      Ubuntu server install doesn't differ much from clean Debian install. I used to be running Ubuntu Warty built up from server install (fluxbox instead of gnome etc.), but dist-upgrading to Hoary then messed up my customized system real harasho.

      I figured out that it would be easier to do clean install than go through mess of purging all unwanted packages (mainly gnome stuff) that came with the dist-upgrade. This time I decided to go with Debian as I'd probably have had same problems again when dist-upgrading from Hoary to Breezy.

      If you are going to use Gnome anyway, then server install of Dapper makes perfect sense. Otherwise, I'd recommend to stay with Debian.

  31. Re: installing on existing ext3 partitions by gordonb · · Score: 1

    There is a bug in the installer. Using the live disk (i386), the installer crashes if you try to install on an existing ext3 partition (overwriting an old install, for example). If you choose to format the partition first, the installation works.

  32. Re:Painless Upgrade MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still laughing at that one!

  33. Some tips for arguing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You seem like someone who likes to argue a lot, but you don't have some of the basic techneques you need for rhetoric. I'd like to give you some tips.

    First of all, don't structure a rebuttal in point by point form unless your opponent has structured their argument that way. In this case, your opponent only has one argument, that there are no users like "grandma" and so a properly structured rebuttal will address that and only that.

    Don't put things like "Your points are absurd" in your introduction, it makes you sound argumentative and unreasonable. Wait until after you have rebutted the points and then draw that conclusion, or better yet, allow readers to come to that conclusion by themselves.

    Don't restate disputed points, saying that grandma is "the vast majority of people who use computer" isn't much good when your opponent has just argued that the vast majority of people who use a computer will not fit into that catagory. First, present your arguments as to why your opponent is wrong, THEN reiterate your point e.g. "many people fit in that category for reasons x, y and z, thus grandma is the vast majority of people who use computer. Restating disputed points is refusing to acknowledge points are disputed which is either disrespectful to your opponent or negative to your own ability to read, neither looks good.

    Never exaggerate unless you know you can get away with it. We all know full well that Ubuntu is built around graphical package management, there is no point pretending that people are expected to use APT from the commandline, it makes you sound as if you actually think that is the case, i.e. that you havn't really used ubuntu enough to know that it isn't true and thus are ignorent.

    Don't make weak points, they weaken your case. Saying that windows can use an automatic update is pointless, because so can Ubuntu and saying that windows automatically updates binary drivers is pointless because Ubuntu does that too once the binary drivers are installed. Doing this just gives your opponent a chance to make clean and snappy retorts, something that is going to help him a lot.

    Don't take cheap shots either, they weaken your charactor. Since ubuntu isn't legally able to ship MP3 support it is probably rude to make a point out of it.

    I hope this will help you in the future.

  34. Re:Painful History \\//_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You young whooper snappers are all about taking shortcuts. Why in my day we had to load 300 punch cards just to run emacs. We got sunburns as vacuum tubes overheated during heavy emacs resource usage, and by golly, we liked it!

  35. So far, I'm not very impressed with the Networking by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

    well, I've been running Ubuntu 5.10 on my ThinkPad T21 for a while now. My wireless card is PCMCIA 3Com 3CRWE6029B card. Under Ubuntu 5.10, it works flawlessly out of the box. However, under 6.06 I can't get cardctl to work with it at all. I can "see" the card, and I can even get it assigned to eth1, but all attempts at getting it to become live have met with no success.

    I tried to install 5.10 and then upgrade to 6.06 to see if that helps since the properly configured conf files would already be there, but no dice. As soon as the upgrade to 6.06 finished, the card went kaput.

    I think they need to make sure that they're maintaining their level of performance without breaking things before rolling new versions out.

    --
    [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
  36. ati drivers suck!! by giorgosts · · Score: 1

    its not ubuntu specific. I tried suse 10.1, even kororaa, and openGL apps freeze computer.. (9600agp on intel945). ati says sth about disabling lock user pages if glxgears freezes, but on agp systems its already disabled. So I have to disable DRI altogether. Another bug is over- or underscanning in dual screen mode. Only half of video plays on the second display (tv). So I have to disable Xv overlay also, which makes video performance shaggy. Xinerama on Kubuntu -both 5.10 and 6.06 also sucks bigtime. It can't find where one sreen ends and when the other starts. May be it involves some command-line wizardry which I am not aware of.It works ok though on SuSE 10.1. Another issue is my CMI8738 sound card which is 7.1 on windows but only a mere double stereo on linux. You know, there is a time limit (weeks) one can devote to configure a linux computer just so his wife can watch movies on the tv while he browses on the monitor!! Esp, if he could have done that as early as 2002 on his XP!!

    1. Re:ati drivers suck!! by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1

      I am unsure as to exactly what you were trying to say; the post was a bit jumbled. However, it did seem that you were talking about ATI's proprietary drivers. The bug mentioned in my post occurs in the xorg ATI driver.

      And yes, so I've heard, the proprietary driver is total crap.

      Also, one is more likely to be understood and responded to on a more regular basis if one takes a moment to post coherently in at least semi-proper English.

      --

      What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    2. Re:ati drivers suck!! by giorgosts · · Score: 1

      Plain English: Ijust want to watch a movie on the tv and being able to browse at the same time. I can do that in windows. So, here it is:xorg ATI driver does not support tv-out so i have to use fglrx. Fglrx FREEZES (like BSOD) when you open up an opengl app (screensaver, torcs, glxgears). So I use fglrx with mesa fallback. Video on tv-out still not working properly, so I disable video acceleration also. My wife complains that linux is total crap! I boot to xp, she watches a movie, and I write this post.. The difficulty in the post is caused from the sheer amount of linux bugs and deficiencies and not so much from my command of the Engligh language. Thanks for reading through though..

    3. Re:ati drivers suck!! by wongn · · Score: 1

      The ATI FGLRX drivers are... ok. They're just exceptionally finickity, tempermental and bad tempered (every update seems to add features but break it entirely). I do believe though that sufficient tampering with xorg and choosing the correct driver version will let you get a complete working hardware accelerated system 9 times out of 10. Need to download Dapper to supplant Breezy alongside Gentoo: has anyone had problems with buggy dist-upgrades?

    4. Re:ati drivers suck!! by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1

      First off, as you'll be more effective if you can at least rant about what's bugging you, your problems aren't Linux specific. While you're likely using a Linux distribution--you'd have much the same problems on any of the BSDs or some other Free or Open system--the problem lies with xorg. More correctly, the problem lies with ATI. The card you and I are using is proprietary and, as such, the specs to properly implement a driver for the bloody thing are closed. That means bugs.

      The reason that you cannot use GL or tv-out properly is not due to 'sheer amount of Linux bugs' (which, again, the problem is X's) but because the ATI people have not given us the tools we need to use their hardware. If you care so much write ATI a letter asking them to release the specs to their card. Posting partially coherent paragraphs to /. certainly won't help.

      My wife complains that linux is total crap!

      If you'd like to run a Free or Open system while being able to pipe out video to one terminal and work on another you're going to have to use different hardware. A Linux distro just isn't going to suit your needs due to the proprietary nature of your hardware. Besides, you seem to be pretty pleased with XP, given that this post and posts made previous tend to hold XP up as the example Linux should function toward, so why make the switch? The *nix world is pretty different from the Windows world and approaching things with the mentality of "XP works this way, and so should $FOO!" is limiting.

      Linux, it would seem in this case, is the wrong tool for the job.

      The difficulty in the post is caused from the sheer amount of linux bugs and deficiencies and not so much from my command of the Engligh language.

      I'm not actually sure how a software bug would affect your wet-ware, so perhaps you're trying to say that having to fiddle with things is making you angry and, thus, removing your command of higher discourse? Perhaps this might help.

      Anyway, good luch and happy hacking!

      --

      What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
  37. Windows is good, but it's not there yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not ready for grandma to use, and as such, it's not a Linux replacement. It still takes many clicks to get DVD support. Want a new nvidia driver? Due to technical limitations, you'll need to manually download and install it. And exotic wifi protocol support is still spotty (but better). Try explaining all that to someone who is computer illiterate. All they know is that this stuff works automatically on the laptop from work with Linux preinstalled.

    Not that I'm ragging on Windows XP; I installed it the first day it came out. But it is being touted as a Linux replacement when it isn't. I think it is only a marginal improvement over the last version in terms of ease of use for people who aren't already savvy. The improved theme certainly looks good, but that only goes so far when you are looking to replace Linux for normal users. I think the Windows team really needs to rethink not distributing a Live CD on their webpage. Ubuntu doesn't seem to have 'licensing issues' when they put Live CDs on bittorrent with those features.

  38. Well PS/2 keyboards are broken now by Laz10 · · Score: 1

    I am happy that your USB keyboard works now.
    Sadly I can report that my PS/2 keyboard that has worked flawlessly with everything else now doesn't work with ubuntu 6.06 by default.

    The fix was to go into the bios and enable USB legacy devices. No clue why, but that did the trick.

    So it is one step forward and one step backwards.

  39. Smart Boot Manager by deunan_k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are times when you have a CD-ROM drive that simply would not co-operate. It does not matter what OS, you've downloaded the ISO, have it burnt, then put it inside the drive, change the BIOS setting to boot from the CD-ROM and simply reboot the machine.

    But the darn thing would not boot.

    I have this problem usually on older machines or just simply on an older CD-ROM drives (on relatively newer machines too).

    My solution? Either changing CD-ROM drive and hope it works or a simpler alternative - Smart Boot Manager - http://btmgr.webframe.org/

    Usually there's no problem in booting up from Floppy.. SBM floppy will boot up and present you with a menu asking where do you want to boot from. Just select CD-ROM and voila!

    Well, it works for me. Even on machines whose BIOS does not even support booting from CD-ROM.

    (Disclaimer - If it still doesn't work, chances are either the CD-ROM really needs replacement or it's an error between keyboard and the chair)

    Peace all!

    --
    Will sys-admin for food
    1. Re:Smart Boot Manager by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      There are times when you have a CD-ROM drive that simply would not co-operate. It does not matter what OS, you've downloaded the ISO, have it burnt, then put it inside the drive, change the BIOS setting to boot from the CD-ROM and simply reboot the machine.

      The Ubuntu menu shows up, I pick the option to run it (I believe the first one), the desktop shows, the mouse pointer shows and responds to mouse movements.

      And it stays like this forever with no disk activity and a blank desktop.

    2. Re:Smart Boot Manager by flacco · · Score: 1
      And it stays like this forever with no disk activity and a blank desktop.

      iirc, this had something to do with a wacky/outdated nvidia driver, when i experienced it on breezy.

      what i did was hit alt-f1 real quickly during boot so that i could get a text console, before the inescapable featureless brown desktop took over. then (i think) i just updated to the latest packages with apt, restarted, and it worked ok.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    3. Re:Smart Boot Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There can be issues with usb cd rom drives and Live CDs. New Knoppix and Ubuntu both boot fine from a usb cd rom drive - Mepis chokes

  40. Re:So far, I'm not very impressed with the Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same problem with a D-Link G650 on an old Tosh S1800. Worked first time impressively in Breezy, nothing doing in post-upgrade Dapper (tho' Cardbus and card still visible). But Dapper does look smoother on LCD screen, the last obstacle to an XP migration overcome (if ever, as a Linux newcomer, I find how to get WiFi back).

  41. Re:So far, I'm not very impressed with the Network by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you need to install restricted-modules for your kernel.

  42. /.tted by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 0

    sometimes i wonder if /. should not post good articles because by the time i see it its gotten flattened xD

    --
    -Noc
  43. Broadcom Wireless works! by pherthyl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Finally!! For the first time my broadcom wireless networking card works with the open source driver! Follow this guide and it's easy: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=185174

    No more ndiswrapper, and now I can use the absolutely amazing knetworkmanager!

  44. links? by giorgosts · · Score: 1

    can you post the links please because I have a similar problem?

    1. Re:links? by dodongo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sure enough: Here's the bug (#47371) which includes a description of what's going on... And this Ubuntu Forums discussion has a fix that worked for me.

      It sounds like for all of these regressions enabling the "ati" driver in xorg.conf will fix the major issues. Of course, the problem then is that you're running the ati driver, not the fglrx driver, which actually comes from ATI. (Confusing as hell, I know).

      You should see something like this in /etc/X11/xorg.conf
      Section "Device"
              Identifier "ATI Technologies, Inc. Radeon RV250 If [Radeon 9000 Pro]"
              Driver "fglrx"
              BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
      EndSection
      If you first do (to make a backup of the xorg.conf file*)
      sudo cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup
      and then use your favorite text editor (with sudo) to change where it says "fglrx" to "ati" (make sure you DO have the quotes in there), then you should be running off the ATI driver which installs by default in Ubuntu.

      Until such time as ATI gets their damn fglrx drivers in line and fixes that regression, it seems like using the open source driver is the easiest alternative.

      ----------

      * - Sorry if this is totally pedantic, but you can reverse the effects of any bad edits you make to xorg.conf by the following command:
      sudo cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup /etc/X11/xorg.conf
  45. Painful Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Took fifteen hours to install on my 800 Mhz Coppermine laptop.

    Wireless is now broken, as it assumes all networks *must* have password protection. Some of us don't like weak encryption and would rather do it well at the application layer, along with RADIUS and MAC filtering for keeping out bandwidth pirates.

    I thought the whole point of using Linux was to avoid having how I do something dictated to me.

    1. Re:Painful Upgrade by bitflip · · Score: 1

      Hey, I made the same changes on my laptop, and when I finally did reboot, I didn't have X, sound, or wireless networking!

      Thanks Ubuntu!

      (I finally got X working, but I'm still figuring out what the deal is with the others)

  46. Only one disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This latest Ubuntu release is mind-boggingly polished and well done. It undoubtedly the most incredible computing experience I have ever had. It is the way of the future. For me it is much, much nicer than OSX. Not even close, and it's vastly more usable and stable as well.

    The only nit I have to pick is with wireless network browsing. I could not figure out how to get a list of wireless networks. It seems like it shouldn't be too hard of a thing to do, and it's such an inconvenience not to have.

    1. Re:Only one disappointment by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Install NetworkManager, and the NetworkManager Gnome applet.

      That'll help :)

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  47. Re:So far, I'm not very impressed with the Network by martijnd · · Score: 1

    The 3COM problem is an annoying one -- especially as my 3COM card used to work under Hoary out of the box.

    Relevant discussion is:

    http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=15602 5&highlight=3com+dapper

    [EDIT] It's still not fixed. I decided to add the islsm_pci driver to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist, and now the prism54 driver gets loaded correctly on boot, with eth1 being brought up automatically. As it used to under Hoary, Breezy, and earlier versions of Dapper.

    The fix is to blacklist the islsm_pci driver which is loaded before the prism54 driver and assumes it can handle the 3COM card when it actually is unable to do so. This done -- the 3COM card works like before.

  48. I like fatcow by bdwoolman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They had (have) a special for new users. Usually they are a pricey but good 99 bucks per year, recently they offered a deal at 66 dollars per year. If you mention me I get a bump for getting you on board. Do so or not. I care not either way (really) I would recommend fatcow anyway. Four years, no probs, but my site is little more than a family photo dump. I like the cow jokes. Don't know why. http://www.fatcow.com/

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  49. Designing Software For Usability-Anyone Doing It? by cannuck · · Score: 0

    Been reading all the banter here about whether or not it's easy to install Ubuntu. Although I am an ancient Mac user (the SE) and although I installed Debian on an IBM iSeries laptop first time round by accident - must have been first time luck since I know 0 about ....

    I did try running the Live CD as well as installing Ubuntu 5.04 on both Mac and IBMs and... no go. Yup I am one of those "grandmothers" - actually a grandfather.

    What amazes me - is the lack of understanding of the notion of "USABILITY" when it comes to designing almost anything in the Western World. Whether it's town planning, and public building, a car, web sites or .... software.

    One would think that in the case of Ubuntu 6 - that someone who specializes in USABILITY would have been part of the team - or do none exist in the world of software? Which would not be too surprising; because, in the case of town planning there is only one specialist in planning public open space on this planet - the Dane Jan Gehl

    Even though I have spent untold $1000s to buy software primarily to compress video for web uses - I am tired (growing old ) that I need to read 7000 web sites to figure out how to produce the best compressed video results. What's even worse is to hear from "compression experts" on those sites - saying that that's the way the software needs to be (to keep the "experts employed"?). On Doom9's forums two employees from Microsoft are there trying to tell readers how to get quality out of VC1. Which demonstrates how UNUSABLE Microsoft software is.

  50. darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just decided today to buy new external hdds and backup and do a new install ... guess what? i took drapper and now i see this article...

    those bastards! they took away the joy of searching hours for all the kernel modules i need like wlan, bluetooth you name it, and all i still had to do was installing the dev environment to compile the ati driver module for my gfx card .... it works like a charm now on my fresh install, dell inspiron 8600

  51. Wait... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1
    You are worried about the recovery shell, but not about your network services....

    I recently set up Dapper on a school development computer and got Apache, PHP, PostgreSQL, and SSH working in a matter of minutes, so, to the developers of Ubuntu, kudos.


    Getting these services started, once installed, only takes seconds and configuration time could be minutes (up to hours) but securing these services could take over a day (if done correctly, including recompiling if needed). Don't worry about that recovery shell - you are being r00ted remotely!
  52. Unfortunate release process by Junta · · Score: 1

    I'm a happy user of Dapper, but I must confess the release process seems unfortunate, and suffers from common release process issues nowadays seen all over the place.

    Notably:
    -Release Candidate no longer seems to mean Release Candidate. Meaning RC releases have just become somewhat more conservative betas, instead of ultra conservative releases that at release time are thought to be release level quality, but tagged 'candidate' just in case. Likewise, the update process should be little more aggresive than post-release update. The fact that after any 'RC' release came and updates still numbered in the 50-70 packages a day means something was not quite right.

    -The delay did nothing. When I saw the delay announcement, it held promise that they would be feature locked and do a proper six week or so bugfix phase. But functionality changed well into the delay. The delay became less about making what would have been 6.04 rock solid and more about tweaking features and functionality. Developers can't resist tweaking that stuff.

    -Release Candidates never become releases. If RC process was strictly done right, you put out a RC that turns out to be acceptable, and it becomes a release (hence the promise of the word 'candidate'. The fact that you have a RC, then some changes, and then Release is not right. It should be RC, if changes needed, apply and do another RC, if no changes, release previous RC.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  53. ignored by everyone? by nonlnear · · Score: 1

    Apparently not.

    --
    argumentum ad fallacium: Fallacy of defining a fallacy which allows one to dismiss the argument in question.
  54. Common issues by Tofflos · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people complaining about video drivers, MP3-support, various missing video-codecs and wireless.

    Frankly, an installation of Windows XP requires that I know what video card I have, where to get the drivers, and how to install them (without messing the system up with that vendors bundled software). Windows XP has MP3-support built-in but getting all the video-codecs to work properly was a nightmare before I tried VLC. Also, I bet that if you asked a lot of regular users you'd find that most of them had someone help them to get wireless working.

    After I'm done with the Windows XP installer I'm usually left with the following tasks: Minor tweaking of the UI and then installation of Adobe Flash, Adobe Reader, nVidia-drivers, Skype and Sun Java.

    Installing those missing applications was very easy with EasyUbuntu. Also it installs Microsoft's fonts for you. It's almost perfect but if I could ask for two more features they would be:

    1. Ability to download and double-click instead of having to resort to the command-line.
    2. A Windows XP edition.

    If you give someone a CD with Ubuntu and tell him/her about EasyUbuntu I'd say that installation is a draw compared with Windows XP.

    My issues with Ubuntu:

    1. About 1 in 10 times I have a working network when I login. The other 9 times I have to deactivate/activate eth1 using network-admin. Maybe DHCP doesn't get enough time to do its' thing during boot? This is on a wired network.

    2. I chose Swedish during the installation (I used the live CD and double-clicked the Install-icon on the desktop). I only received partial Swedish. I had to use the language-support-thingie in the administration menu and select Swedish after installation was complete.

    3. Without EasyUbuntu the ride wouldn't have been this smooth. There's something wrong when a lot of people need to download a third-party product to "complete" the installation.

    1. Re:Common issues by DigDuality · · Score: 1

      you can double click deb files now and install them that way. The "3rd" party stuff such as Easy Ubuntu and/or Automatix isn't b/c there's something wrong with the installation. It's a legal issue, not a technical one. The codecs, fonts and such can technically be included very easily. Unfortunately these are closed formats that are owned by others (as are alot of drivers). A free distro can't afford to include them.

  55. suspend works with a little tweaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dapper is a major improvement over Breezy. Synaptic is still the top reason to go with Ubuntu. You can enable all the repositories in a minute, and they are very complete and up to date. They even have VMWare Player, so I don't have to download it manually. I'm also pleased that suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk work with nvidia, but not without a little hassle unfortunately. After I enabled the proprietary nvidia drivers, I enabled sleep in /etc/default/acpi-support and in gnome-power-manager through gconf, then erased the word "splash" in /boot/grub/menu.lst. It looks like the splash makes the ctrl+alt+Fn terminals not work. So I don't have a bootsplash, but that's not a big deal.

    Another problem is that network-manager-gnome (which I think should have been installed by default) doesn't detect vpnc without this fix: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=184122&hi ghlight=vpnc

  56. what not to do by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    I just upgraded from version 5.04 directly to 6.06 without rebooting or anything. Now my system has no network connection.

    The next 1-4 hours of my Saturday are going to be very not-fun. Don't be like me. Keep your system up-to-date.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:what not to do by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 1

      Me too. It seems the upgrade process never loads the NIC module, and I never knew which one I used, because the (k)ubuntu install always took care of it automatically. lspci told me all I needed to know, and voila.

  57. Installation by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

    A friend tried to install it but for some reason it just stopped in the middle of the procedure. the Livedisks runs find no problem so that has him scratching is head.

  58. Re:Dapper is good, but it's not there yet./codecs by Doug+Coulter · · Score: 1

    They cannot provide the codecs. The reason Microsoft can is that they do pay licensing fees for them (a pittance, due to volume, so it doesn't affect the 96% profit margin too much). This is made clear in many of the howtos etc -- you might be breaking the laws in your country when you get the codecs and use them. Some enterprising person might find a way to sell you a legal package fairly cheap, but for now, that part comes from fly-by-night sources that tend to appear and disappear from the web, to pop up under another name and isp later on. Sad, but true.

  59. Re: installing on existing ext3 partitions by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    I'm telling you it doesn't even see the partitions. So I can't very well format them. I suppose if I was really determined, I could boot another linux, say Mandriva, and format the partitions and then try the installer again. Just the fact that it doesn't see the partitions makes me too nervous though. Like it might mangle my disk because it is "confused".

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  60. Re:Painful History \\//_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you had vacuum tubes! You had it *easy*. Why, back in the day, we had to stack rocks in base two piles by moonlight after a 25 hour a day stretch down in the mines, followed by a nice refreshing drink of wild rabies infected badger milk, both ways, uphill in the snow wearing rose thorn sandals and we liked it that way!

  61. DIST-UPGRADE, I repeat - DIST-UPGRADE by shish · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lots of people complaining about X breaking, and I had the same problem (and a load of others) -- then I realised I ran "apt-get upgrade" instead of "apt-get dist-upgrade". Dist-upgrade worked, and fixed X (and several, but not all the other problems)

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    1. Re:DIST-UPGRADE, I repeat - DIST-UPGRADE by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Lots of people complaining about X breaking, and I had the same problem (and a load of others) -- then I realised I ran "apt-get upgrade" instead of "apt-get dist-upgrade"

      The other thing to watch-out for: if you've installed the proprietary, non-free NVidia drivers, then upgrading Ubuntu will leave you without a graphical desktop.

  62. Ubuntu 6.06 and SUSE 10.1 by epa · · Score: 1

    To compare the latest Ubuntu and SUSE is interesting. I have used SuSE for years, but since SUSE came along, quality has gone down and 10,1 is truly dire. The first official "Most annoying bug" is "Applying security fixes via zen-updater might not work." In other words, the core software updater is broken (which makes getting an update for it tricky). No matter (you might think) since the venerable YaST is still there, but they have broken that too for 10.0! The second official most annoying bug is "Installing an RPM which is both on the install media and on the online update source will crash YaST." For a final release, this is a show-stopper to my mind, and signs of sevrely flawed quality control. I beta-tested Drake (which became 6.06) and had so few problems with it, I hardly filed any bugs. Ubuntu seems to have concentrated on reliability and quality while managing to include late versions. SUSE10.1 just seems pointless in comparison - broken and a Gnome version behind. A (Guess which distro is installed on the machine this post comes from ;-)

    --
    Time is life: speed saves it. LJK Setright
    1. Re:Ubuntu 6.06 and SUSE 10.1 by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      The problem with SuSE is easily fixable; and not via their "correct" means.

      The "problems" with SuSE 10.1 are all in the package manager(s). YaST still works great; as does Smart, which is in the base repository. Zenworks Management, on the other hand, is currently total crap. It just doesn't seem to work properly, at all.

      The solution? Only use YaST; the YaST bugs introduced between 10.0 and 10.1 were resolved. This was the primary push of the early betas. Better yet, YaST synchronizes sources&updates with ZMD. This means that if ZMD ever starts to work properly, you can use it.

      Me? I use the Smart package manager. It's fast, stable, and resolves dependancies better than APT, YaST, URPMI, and ZMD. It handles mirrors and broken mirrors elegantly. Smart rocks.

      Someone in the Gnome side of the Novell/SuSE team is pushing ZMD hard, and I don't really know why. I think it has something to do with enterprise management schemes that ZMD is archeticturally designed for. For standard desktop usage, however, Smart is vastly superior, and it works properly, today.

      Once you get past package management (which can be done without updates. Just install Smart or use YaST) , I'd argue that SuSE is substantially better than the other distributions. Even the old version of Gnome is justified; its _very_ polished, and it doesn't have any of the sorts of annoynances that plague Fedora or Mandrake. It just works.

      I dislike the direction that Novell is taking SuSE's package management. I hope they get it straightened out soon.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    2. Re:Ubuntu 6.06 and SUSE 10.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all due respect that's just one of the long liteny of gotchas in suse., Saying "only" the package manger is broken is in manyways like saying "only" software-update from MacOS X is broken.

  63. Re:Painful History \\//_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you too?

  64. Exploding heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh, does your granny use emacs?

  65. no contest really by zogger · · Score: 1

    I can build a reasonably good enough system (reusing my old drives and case and ram, etc, just doing a mobo/cpu upgrade)(or do it from some old pentium junker), AND load the OS and apps for what a copy of OSX or XP costs normal retail, and with OSX you are stuck running the hardware they pick out and choose for you, plus it is mostly non free software and a ton of the extra apps cost serious folding money.

        I am right this second running Austrumi 1.20,(just DLed and burnt it today and booted it for a test drive) at only 50 megs under windows manager Enlightenment 17, runs entirely from RAM,meaning it is about as fast as stuff can run basically,plus it frees up the optical drive, I mean, nothing from mac or windows can touch it, either from a systems resources point of view or from a speed or functionality point of view at *50 megs total*, or from a cost in cash POV. Then you can go to any of the big name brand full sized linux distros of choice if you want to fit your machine of choice, at virtually any budget, ten bucks used at the thriftstore to ten million dollars custom high end hardware at acme advanced secret research, inc..

    Theres really no comparison what you can do with Linux as opposed to whatever you can drag away from from Apple or MS. They make you fit their idea of computing, Linux lets the individual custom tailor what they want to do with computing. Except maybe for running a few niche or necessary/obscure applications, but for over-all generalised use...no comparison any longer. You can take the linux kernel and run on any sized low budget normal machine all the way up to multi node super computers with about any sort of application you can think of, all for minimal to zero initial software cost. Thats what is so cool about linux, eXtreme flexibility, and you got a choice from totally free in cost to pay for as much handholding as is necessary. *Choice*

    - good integration and commercial support-you can go for free to whatever you want to spend with linux support, unlimited

    - carries the name of a recognized brand-Linux is so far mainstream now, every single major media outlet has carried numerous articles for years, it needs no further introduction, its like saying, "welcome to the 21st century, we have cars now, check em out!"

    - something different that has a reputation for rock solid stability-WAY more config diffs under linux then under mac or windows and stability is a non issue, its *there*, it is a major bragging point.

    - user-friendly-pure command line for the fattest gray haired gurus all the way to very nice looking (this e17 is *nice*) and functional GUI, its the same deal realistically now, user friendly for most any user, and you have a LOT more choices with linux

    And the most important part?? Freedom. You can look at any tiny detail and change it to whatever you want, total freedom. You aint getting that from apple or MS.....

    Look at the one laptop per child project, arguably the largest planned technological rollout to the most people ever conceived, the goal is stick a laptop in the hands of every kid on earth eventually. This will be known in future history as a serious major turning point once it starts happening, and it looks pretty good it will. Now, they had to choose,the softare is a critical part of this ambitious undertaking, they looked at it, MS and Apple-not even in the running for a project of this grand a vision. Default resource hogs and no freedom at all knocked them out early in the considerations.

  66. Server and KDE versions too by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I ran Kubuntu Breezy (5.10) on 5 home machines (2 servers and 3 workstations) for quite a few months.

    In Breezy, the server came on the same CD as the GUI (kubuntu). The servers do not have any GUI on them (and I like that way). The workstations have no local data at all, and use NIS/autofs to mount the home directories from the server.

    When the release candidate of Dapper came out, I updated my test server using an edit of the sources.list, two commands, and a reboot.

    When Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper came out, I had a new server to replace the old one. This is an AMD 64, with A8V (stay away from A8V-MX by the way). So, I installed it using the amd64/x86_64 version of the server CD, and copied all my old server to it.

    Today, I reinstalled one of the workstation (a Pentium II 450 with 768 MB) using Dapper. I tried the kubuntu desktop live CD twice from the GUI, and it would copy packages, but not complete, and have to be hard rebooted.

    Then I used the alternate desktop CD, which has the old text based installer, and that worked fine.

    All in all I am happy with it, but can't explain why the glitch with the GUI install. I still have 2 workstation to install/upgrade. We will see how those go.

  67. Mac OS X is not nearly as compatible by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    >I can't help but think that Apple's Mac OS X meets all of these. Besides being proprietary, what exactly about Mac OS X is not "nearly as effectiv[e]" compared to these four Linux distributions?

    The extremely obvious, and implied criterion:
    - runs on standard hardware

    [oops, i almost said
    -runs on x86]

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  68. blank/no desktop under ubuntu live by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about the Dapper Live CD? I had exactly the same problems with the Live CD from either Hoary or Breezy, I forget which, when it used to come on two CDs, a Live CD and an install CD.

    Also, I've had the same problem after installing Hoary and updating to Breezy w/o CD, just using apt-get. Upon reboot, everything starts up fine until Gnome, when the mouse pointer appears on a brown background, but no desktop.

    Never really bothered to find out what was up. I have a Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pro laptop, but I don't really see what kind of hardware problem it would be..

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  69. Re:Painful History \\//_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You had sandles?????? Why my idea of heaven was to drink rabies milk and wear rose thorn sandles. We walked on a combination of fiery burning ash mixed with shards of rock.

  70. ATI Graphics support... by simonjp · · Score: 1

    ... sucks. I have an X800GT. It's not recognised in the setup (R423) and this I cant boot X. Now this would be ok as there are work arounds for it with an install, but I got the desktop CD to try it out without having to mess around with my partitions (I doubt it can read an XP dynamic disk array)... but with a live cd I dont want to have to reconfigure it *every time i boot*.

    the cd went in the bin.

    Result:
    XP64 0.1 // Ubuntu -10.

    --
    , , , , , karma elon
    1. Re:ATI Graphics support... by somebraincells · · Score: 0

      you could go into "safe mode" follow these instructions on another comp or write them down http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Dapper_Ins tallation_Guide " Method 1: Installing Dapper's Included Driver (8.25.18) The included fglrx driver supports Radeon 8500+ and the X-series cards up to X1900."

  71. Linux: Fun Again by foleymon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now say what you will. I have been playing with various flavours of linux for years but have always lost interest. Being it blowing up the machine, free beer, the 80's, recovering from the 80's, the 90's (if they really happened at all) and various and sundry things that can so often throw us off our path and: after months of frustration with trying to load up on my Walmart Basic A535 with the RAM maxed out at 512, nothing huge but we play with what we have. All the other distros and hours on google and half a pack of smokes, it was just no longer fun to play. With Ubuntu, bang, zoom, 99.94% of all my hardware was recognized (bear in mind 82.43143212334342232323_% of all statistics are made up on the spot). A quick search, couple of sudo commands and my wireless was working like a charm. I have had so much fun back playing with this. I am interested again. I am learning a ton in almost no time. The fact that my sound works, my cards work, my video was configured makes the experience so much more enjoyable. I really think that if 'new' people try this they will like this. It's nice to have converts regardless of the motivation. I make my living consulting and supporting m$ stuff and thats just the way it goes. But with a rocking home network and lots of boxes I can't wait to see what the playground becomes when this new toy joins the crew. If your new to linux, give this a try, have some fun. Nothing to lose and a wonderful new way of looking at all the things you pay to do anyway.

  72. Works great in Parallels (IntelMac virtualization) by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    Installs perfectly in Parallels (release candidate 2) running on a MacBook. Use the x86 Desktop edition, choose a Linux > "Debian" environment.

    Only trick is getting a network connection via a MacBook's AirPort card. For that, choose "Host Only Networking" in the Parallels parameter screen (this has to be done as it defaults to a Bridged Ethernet port and emulates a Realtek NIC, which would require a cable to be plugged in).

    Then go to Mac OS X's System Preferences > Sharing > Internet.
    Select "Share connection from: AirPort"
    Select "To computers using: eth2" (should be a bottom of list)

    Make sure Ubuntu is using DHCP in its Networking config (it does by default), and has its default Ethernet port active. Now you should be able to open Ubuntu's pre-installed Firefox and check you've got a connection.

  73. Re:i don't know about grandma... but grandpa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is so sick of windows that he asked me about linux...

    and, no, he doesn't know windows very well at all. last time i visited, i bought him a windowsxp total newbie book.

    my last correspondence with "grandpa" was via email - he asked how to get rid of a new spyware that doesn't go away after spending several hours messing around with the various antyi-spyware products.

    last tiome i visited grandpa, i spent 2 days rehabbing his system and setting him up with avg, adware, spybot, ms beta adware, etc... he said he ran those tools and the spyware remains.

    the year prior, he had a firend wipe the drive and reinstall... normal winxp maintenance for grandma and grandpa, no?

    i don't know about grandma... but grandpa is *ready* for linux.

    he won't be getting ubuntu, though.

    rather, he'll be getting simply mepis.

    i'm sure both are nice, but i use mepis and like it - so that's what he'll be getting.

  74. 1024 x 768 max... WTF? by mad.frog · · Score: 1

    Will someone please tell me why the standard install (on my nForce2 system) assumes that 1024 x 768 is the highest possible resolution my display can handle?

    I mean, it's not like pretty much every computer made in the last 5 years or so can't handle substantially higher resolutions...

    (And for all of those who are about to respond, "just edit the xorg.conf file" or whatever... why the fuck should that be necessary? Just because I can doesn't mean that I should need to...)

    1. Re:1024 x 768 max... WTF? by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

      Strangely, the upgrade to Dapper fixed exactly that problem for me. Have you filed a bug report?

    2. Re:1024 x 768 max... WTF? by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      No... I'm still fuming over that fact that I partitioned at existing disk (with a WinXP install) and it fucked up the MBR such that the WinXP partition refused to boot...

  75. Syntax error #42 by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1


    I doubt the Ubuntu team will be capable of fixing your granny's exploded head.
    <syntaxnazi>
    Reminds me of the time I dropped my watch in the river and it stopped running.
    </syntaxnazi>
    </jerk>

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  76. Live CD printing broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Live CD printing is broken on k/ubuntu.

    http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2072

    Here's a KDE developer that's not too happy about it (me either).

    --AR

  77. where is the review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are only couple sreenshots of gnome!

  78. Ubuntu install easier than XP initial startup by jrifkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This past week I've install Ubuntu on my old gateway laptop, and help a friend set up (not install) XP on her
    new HP laptop.

    The Ubuntu install was suprisingly easy. I answered 3 or 4 questions, like my name and my time zone, and
    do I want to install Ubuntu on the entire hard drive (I answered yes). After the install finished, my wireless was working
    without a hitch, and I had a nice clean desktop to enjoy.

    In comparison, the XP setup was mystifying, and it was *already* installed. During bootup, windows kept popping up,
    sometimes several unrelated windows at once. First, a registration window came up. While we were trying to answer
    the list of questions there, an Anti-Virus wizard popped up. Next a little window came up to tells use that XP had found
    my wireless network, but strangely enough the registration app didn't know how to use it.

    Next, a Recovery wizard popped up and recommended that we make recovery disks (using 1 double layer DVD, 2 single layer DVDs,
    or 13! CDs). Another little window told use to install an XP update, so I completed that first. Then, we took the suggestion of
    the Anti-Virus wizard to reboot, and we've never seen the Recovery wizard since. We even went searching the disk and the
    help system - couldn't find it.

    Wireless never came up by itself, we had to drill into the Control Panel to enable it.

    When we were all done, we were greeted by a desktop festooned with icon/ads. There was an icon for Blockbuser,
    AOL dialup, AOL broadband, MS Office 2003 60 day trial, etc.

    Another point of comparison, when I inserted my USB key in the Ubuntu laptop, a folder appears with a list of files on the key. Nice. Under XP,
    before I can even view the contents, I have to choose who to see it. It is a photo album? A slideshow? There were more choices than could
    fit in the pop-window, one had to scroll down to see the Ubuntu equivalent option, view files.

    In every way I preferred Ubuntu experience, and I'm sure my grey-haired Mom would feel the same.

  79. Wireless support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, wireless support in Debian Etch is broken at the moment for my Orinoco Gold card, and that's what forced me to switch to Ubuntu 5.10 (I'm not going to downgrade as far as Sarge).

    I don't know how pcmcia-utils and the 2.6.15 wireless stuff got pushed through so fast---it obviously isn't well-tested.

    Hopefully by the time Etch is released it will be working and I can upgrade.