Slashdot Mirror


Games Seized Following Murder

GamePolitics reports that M-rated games have been taken as evidence a case involving the death of a 55-year old man in Louisiana. The connection? Jack Thompson says: "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman or a videogamer." GP goes on to point out the lunacy of this claim. From the site: "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries."

354 comments

  1. Cue the Dick Cheney jokes by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    in 3.. 2.. 1..

    1. Re:Cue the Dick Cheney jokes by amrust · · Score: 1

      He is the 2nd link for me, when I just checked. ;-)

      --
      VOTE!
    2. Re:Cue the Dick Cheney jokes by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of doing a "b...b...but Clinton".

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    3. Re:Cue the Dick Cheney jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok i got one for you, he shot that dude becuase he had a hat on that reminded him of the dog in duck hunt

      (funny as im typing this the authentication word is "accident")

  2. Doesn't the Pres play Duck Hunt? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    if so, then he must be a murderer too, cause that's a game.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Doesn't the Pres play Duck Hunt? by nule.org · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Is somebody claiming that President Bush isn't a murderer?

      Wish I could say I was joking.

    2. Re:Doesn't the Pres play Duck Hunt? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      not I. I was just referring to the angle of the shot.

      of course, if we're to believe your claim, that would validate the saying that the pen is mightier than the shotgun.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  3. Why is that Jack by moe.ron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman or a videogamer."

    Is this a comment on similar mentalities between hitmen and videogamers or is Jack trying to say they're the only people with good enough aim to hit consistent head shots?

    Seriously though, how is this news? If the police are building any sort of murder case against anyone, they are going to sieze everything remotely related to murder and killing. Whether it be videogames, music, movies, books, etc. anything that helps the DA say, "this person has murder on the mind, and here is what I have to back that up."

    1. Re:Why is that Jack by Indefinite,+Ephemera · · Score: 2, Informative

      The way Game Politics puts it, the police seized the games as a result of Thompson's input; if that's correct then he's been influencing police activities, which makes matters more newsworthy.

      TFA: 'The WFPSO took Thompson's information and used it as a basis to search the home of a 16-year-old suspect in the crime. A police official told the newspaper that deputies seized several M-rated video games from the residence. Captain Spence Dilworth, however, drew no conclusions from his findings.'

    2. Re:Why is that Jack by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Seriously though, how is this news? If the police are building any sort of murder case against anyone, they are going to sieze everything remotely related to murder and killing."

      That's true.
      A friend of mines brother and his best friend stabbed someone to death. The police arrested the pair the next day and mostly cleaned out this kids room (he still lived at home). The police took the bathroom sink in the basement next to his room even though it contained no visible trace of blood.

      I guess the police figured they washed up there.

      --
      My studio - www.graylands.ca
    3. Re:Why is that Jack by moe.ron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This just in: While searching a murder suspects home police have come across various boxes containing data discs. These boxes are covered with violent imagery and words like "Hitman, Grand Theft Auto, and True Crime". While authorities have declined to comment on any connection, we here at the Associated Press feel that without the help of one Jack Thompson, the police officers would have completely overlooked such obscure and truly puzzling pieces of evidence and would have never drawn any connection between them and the suspects alleged violent behavior.

      Also from TFA: "I think (the murder) goes beyond video games, but who's to say?," Dilworth commented, adding that the question of whether video games lead to youth violence might be "more of a debate for the living room rather than the courtroom."

      Doesn't sound like the local police are too amused with Jack Thompson's "theories". Once again, this isn't news because the games that were siezed will play no role in the murder trial. The cops are like, "Yea we found M-rated video games, who cares? The kid confessed."

      Jack Thompson is a crackpot and the only reason he gets any attention at all is because people see his name in an article and suddenly its a top story.

    4. Re:Why is that Jack by irablum · · Score: 1

      sounds like the kid should hire jack Thompson and go for a "the video games made me do it, they made me insane" type defense.

      Maybe that's what he's hoping for.

      Ira

    5. Re:Why is that Jack by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      Exactly, we didn't call him Batty Jack for nothing. He's a media whore of the worst kind.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    6. Re:Why is that Jack by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Jack Thompson is a crackpot"

      Agreed.

      "the only reason he gets any attention at all is because people see his name in an article and suddenly its a top story."

      Okay, your logic here defies me. The only reason he gets lots of attention is because he gets lots of attention?

  4. Shot in the face by slashflood · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are clearly some unrelated results from Google search - if you turn off SafeSearch.

    1. Re:Shot in the face by ElleyKitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So murder is "safe" but we must be protected from cumshots?

      Yeah, it's hard to even feign surprise, but dammit, things are fucked up.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    2. Re:Shot in the face by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      Things sure are odd... sex is much more natural than gunshots to the face, but "oh noes think of the children, we don't want them to see nature (well, okay, cumshots don't really happen in nature, but you know what I'm getting at) but gunshots are okay". With whackos like Jack Thompson running around trying to make things "better", of course things are fudged up. My preference is to just sit back and enjoy the world as it slowly kills my brain.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    3. Re:Shot in the face by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, you are funny. I am hardly greasy, I shower every day (I have to for my job) and my hair is soft and natural (and it smells good too!). Furthermore, what assumption brought you to think that I'm a gamer -- I said nothing about me playing games, just that people were focused more on "oh no sex = bad" than "gunshot bang bang"... don't you know that when you make an assumption you make and ass out of you and 'mption? A "greasy gamer" like me at least has the courtesy to not post anonymously when they attack someone. I pride myself in knowing that I'm not completely ignorant. Don't jump to conclusion off of baseless stereotypes -- think for yourself :D

      p.s. yes, I had it and I wish I didn't, I thought the girl I was with was "the one" but she wasn't, so I regret it. Happy :D?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    4. Re:Shot in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's 91,200,000 without quotes and 751,000 with quotes (excact match).

    5. Re:Shot in the face by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      /agree

      I think it's very sad that a violent game about killing police, stealing cars, and shooting pedestrians with shotguns only becomes M-rated if a male character can get intimate with a female character.

      Would you rather expose your kid to sexual themes, or murder themes?

    6. Re:Shot in the Face by soft_guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does that mean we can shoot Jack Thompson in the face?

      I hereby give you permission. Go for it.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    7. Re:Shot in the face by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Uh dude, you're replying to an AC...

      I suggest you browse them at -6, your brain will thank you for it later.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    8. Re:Shot in the Face by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hereby give you permission. Go for it.
      Careful - the US is a land of litigious bastards, and you might just find yourself with an accessory to murder charge :)

      You just need to disclaim all liability in a 1.5pt unreadable font to be absolved of liability haha...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    9. Re:Shot in the face by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 0

      personally being a guy id much rather end up dead than "shot in the face" on google...probably linked to bang bros. and other stuff

      --
      -Noc
    10. Re:Shot in the face by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      I know, I know... it's just that, when I get called greasy I get upset... you see -- my parents were both killed in a tragic greasing accident. Yes, the Great Greasing of '93... *sniffle*

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    11. Re:Shot in the Face by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      I once claimed that I would take a bullet for this country.

      I never explicitly stated where I would take it, what calibre it would be, or whom I would be firing it at. Unfortunately, the odds of getting all the people I can think of to stand in a single line whilst I aimed a High-Powered Elephant Gun at them are low to nil.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    12. Re:Shot in the face by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1
      Would you rather expose your kid to sexual themes, or murder themes?


      That would be an interesting poll if you ask me.
    13. Re:Shot in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, it's hard to even feign surprise, but dammit, things are fucked up."

      Not really. Teen pregnancy occurs far more often than teen-shooting-in-the-face. For most parents, the likelihood of sex related problems from their kids is far higher than the liklihood of them taking pot-shots at cars on the freeway. It's really not all that f'd up, just a matter of widening your view a bit.

    14. Re:Shot in the face by nasor · · Score: 1

      It's because most parents (probably correctly) don't think that there's any real chance of their kid going out and killing police, stealing cars, and shooting pedestrians, so they don't really worry about it. They do, however, worry about their kids having sex. It's not so much a question of which act they think is worse, but rather a question of which act their child is likely to actually do.

      I'm not saying they're necessarily correct, but that's why most parents get more upset about sexual content than violent content.

    15. Re:Shot in the face by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this is an interesting distinction between the US and Canada. Up here, it seems to be slanted the other way. And most people I've discussed it with agree that violence is way more offensive.

      --
      :x
    16. Re:Shot in the face by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      I'm just thinking, perhaps the reasoning is that our children are more inclined to have sex than murder people. I may get flamed for this, but it's pretty simple to see that children are influenced by what they witness. If our children found it irrestistable to run with scissors and there was a pandemic of one eyed rugrats, concerned parents might have issues with media depicting people running with scissors. So, I think the reason many parents don't mind their children witnessing depicted violence is that the parents themselves are not particularly drawn towards violence. This is not to say humans are not inclined to violence, but that in comparison we're much more inclined towards sex. I'd estimate by at least an order of magnitude.

    17. Re:Shot in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG!
      The game was rated "M" to begin with, it only became "AO" after the intimate content was hacked into.

    18. Re:Shot in the Face by ultramk · · Score: 1

      You just need to disclaim all liability in a 1.5pt unreadable font to be absolved of liability haha...

      As luck would have it, that's taken care of by slashdot's new layout.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    19. Re:Shot in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Move to Japan. Judeo-Christian imposed shame on sexuality is blissfully absent. People bathe naked in communal baths, sometimes mixed-sex. Pornos are next to regular magazines in the newsstand. Condoms are on display shelves like regular items in the convenience store (you don't need to ask a clerk to get one for you behind the counter).

      And you know what? Sex crime rates are LOWER in Japan than elsewhere in the world. Says something about an open vs. a repressive sexual attitude.

      Sweden's pretty open too, from what I hear.

      Check out http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.h tml for a fascinating analysis about sexual repression and violence.

    20. Re:Shot in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. The ratings systems are saying that murder is permissible material for teens, but consensual sex isn't.

      I figured it out! One makes FEWER teenagers, and one makes MORE! And the LAST thing we need is more teenagers! Bravo, ESRB!

    21. Re:Shot in the face by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "This is not to say humans are not inclined to violence, but that in comparison we're much more inclined towards sex."

      I guess I missed something. This is a bad thing in what way? What is wrong with humans engaging in perfectly natural acts in a responsible manner? Last I checked, irresponsible acts tend to occur more often where the information children have been exposed to has been censored than where mature explanations and solutions have been presented. Or are we just refering to the nuts who believe in magic men with gray beards floating in the sky again?

    22. Re:Shot in the face by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Would you rather expose your kid to sexual themes, or murder themes?"

      Both? I find that exposing my child to both allows me to make sure that my child has a mature understanding of the matter. I have never understood parents who thought that censoring life from their children would somehow magically result in them being BETTER able to cope when they encounter the censored aspects of life.

      Life is life and kids will discover it, you can be upfront with it from the very beginning (sex is no more difficult for a children to cope with than any other bodily function at a very young age) or you can wait. Waiting presents a wonderful opportunity for thier 5 year old friends to share bad information and misunderstandings, parts or which may not be corrected for years. The older children are the less absolutely they trust their parents and the more they trust friends and other sources of information (the is especially true if parents have told them fairytales and censored their lives as young children). Those misunderstandings could even lead to deep set behavioral patterns since the primarily functions of the brain are still developing when the child learns this information.

      As for violence. Humans are violent creatures. Children will discover violence even if they never saw any outside input. It is only a matter of time before they commit violent acts of their own based on instinct alone. This is again another opportunity to expose them and explain the truth of the world to them. You can argue that children shouldn't have to worry about serial rape and murder. I would counter that neither should you and I. That doesn't change that these things are a fact of life and my child is going to wary of the man trying to coax him or her into a car while your child will be ignorant of the danger.

      Censoring what a child is exposed to is not doing that child a favor, it is promoting ignorance and false values.

    23. Re:Shot in the Face by gijoel · · Score: 0
      Agreed. Does that mean we can shoot Jack Thompson in the face? Maybe this is his way of expressing his need for this. Any takers? I can imagine a mob of gamers swarming this guy, all shooting him in the face


      The word Bukkake somehow sprung to mind when I read this and I began to feel really ill.
    24. Re:Shot in the face by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 2, Informative

      From an external point of view, the US doesn't seem to have made the good choice:
      *Almost anyone has "self-defense" handweapons so many children are killed by their parents' gun (and the risk of being shot is about 100 times bigger than in my country).
      *Any sexual reference is taboo, and then you see all those average drunk student in Cancun doing things that many pornstars here would be ashamed of. Maybe if they had a proper sexual education instead of just puritanism and hardcore...

    25. Re:Shot in the face by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      This is a bad thing in what way? What is wrong with humans engaging in perfectly natural acts in a responsible manner? I'd say the key word is "responsible," and defining what that means. Sex is dangerious and most children don't understand the potential dangers. Parents have a desire for their children to do as well as possible financially, in our culture that seems to involve being married before you have children. Also, STDs are a great risk no matter what precautions are taken, except when both individuals involved have had no oppertunity to become infected.
                I'm not sure why it's so difficult for people to see the obvious potential dangers of sex. Here's a simple exersize: Imagine for a moment that for three generations(60 years) people had only one sex partner their entire life. In 60 years nearly every deadly STD would be wiped from the planet. That should be enough to convince anyone that sex can be very dangerious.

    26. Re:Shot in the Face by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      What, you mean you didn't read the disclaimer? That's not a hyphen between his post and his sig, you know...

    27. Re:Shot in the face by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Almost anyone has "self-defense" handweapons so many children are killed by their parents' gun (and the risk of being shot is about 100 times bigger than in my country)."

      Almost nobody here has handguns, that simply isn't true. They are heavily regulated. The anti-gun nonsense is propoganda anyway. Countries with gun bans and anti-gun regulation have lower gun-related crime but they have crime rates in general. The reason is obvious, if you have gun bans then only the criminals have guns and criminals can be confident of this. Criminals aren't as likely to rob a home if most homeowners are armed and it is legal to kill someone robbing your home. Simple as that. The size and type of the guns is a fairly silly thing to argue about, if you restrict the type of weapon I can have, you have only given an advantage to the criminal who does not respect your law.

      "*Any sexual reference is taboo, and then you see all those average drunk student in Cancun doing things that many pornstars here would be ashamed of. Maybe if they had a proper sexual education instead of just puritanism and hardcore..."

      Personally I don't understand being ashamed of sex at all. I have to agree with the puritanism. In the US people like to forget that the 'religious freedom' that was being looked for by the initial inhabitants was actually the freedom to excercise religious beliefs that were so extreme the torturing and witch burning catholics wouldn't even allow them.

      *sighs* Well, at least we don't have video monitoring of our streets... yet.

    28. Re:Shot in the face by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure why it's so difficult for people to see the obvious potential dangers of sex. Here's a simple exersize: Imagine for a moment that for three generations(60 years) people had only one sex partner their entire life. In 60 years nearly every deadly STD would be wiped from the planet. That should be enough to convince anyone that sex can be very dangerious."

      Excellent strawman. Yes sex can be dangerous. In other news, if all humans and animals on earth stopped breathing for 60 years then nearly all airborn pathogens on earth would be wiped out in that time. Clearly we should censor all information about breathing from our children!

      The dangers of sex are not even relevant. If you explain sex to children right alongside using the potty and explain responsible sexual habits right along with how to flush and why they should put the seat down there will be a reduction in the spread of STD's not an increase.

      You will never see an elimination of STD's however. STD's as a big public concern are a new things, STD's are not. STD's aren't even especially more widespread than they were in the past either. Most STD's are curable and are nothing more than annoying. Even the STD's that can be fatal or serious rarely are, just like strep throat can be fatal. If you have exposed your children to information about sex instead of censoring it from them, not only will they know what signs to look for in a partner to spot STD's, and what precautions to take to prevent contracting an STD in the first place, but they will also be prepared to take the appropriate action and seek treatment in a timely manner if they contract an STD. HIV and AIDS are still by and large spread among homosexuals, despite lots of anti-sex propoganda that would have you believe otherwise.

      Not having sex because you could contract an STD is like not bbqing because the propane tank could explode. There is always a chance (just like the chance of explosion) and reasonable sensible precautions can be taken to reduce and virtually eliminate the chances of contracting a fatal or incurable STD. Obviously, when visiting an asian nation with 80+% STD rate reasonable precaution is completely abstaining.

      Monogomy would be nice and all, but it also runs contrary to human instinct and human nature. In the natural sense human males are designed to be breeding studs who impregnate as many females as possible (whilst preventing competing males from doing the same) and that is exactly what our bodies tell us to do. Females of the species have instincts that push them to compete for attention from the males (very strong instincts as any male can tell you) and a learned behavior to keep males around to help raise children. Even the christian bible code of morals that is so widely pushed by the superstitious does not stipulate monogomy. In fact, the law of moses says that a man commits adultry only when he has relations with another mans wife, under the law of moses any non-married female a man has intercourse with becomes his wife automatically in the eyes of God. Of course it also assures us that when adultry IS commited under the terms of God's law the woman's uncle becomes sterile and she should be put to death.

  5. Google stats are meaningless by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what if "shot in the face" turns up 900,000 hits (it only shows 13,000 hits in my browser). "Jews did 911" turns up almost 900,000 easily.

    The point of this is that you can't extrapolate something like a Google search into evidence. Police who have experience with crime probably have a somewhat better perspective on the hows and whys of crime than you Joe Searchbot does.

    1. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Indefinite,+Ephemera · · Score: 5, Informative

      In this case the claim is that there exists no person who shoots someone in the face and is not a hitman and is not a gamer - so what's required to debunk that claim is a counterexample (someone who shoots someone in the face and is neither a hitman nor a gamer), and only one is logically required; presumably the Google numbers are for rhetorical force. ('How can he have overlooked all these easily found counterexamples?')

      TFA's paragraph in full: 'Funny, that. A quick Google search on "shot in the face" turns up 921,000 entries. Here's a quick sample just from the past week. We see nary a video game or a hitman among them.'

    2. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Dmala · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point of saying this is to highlight the absurdity of the comment. There have clearly been thousands of incidents where someone got shot in the face. Is it really plausible to believe that all of them involved a hitman or a videogamer?

    3. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How can he have overlooked all these easily found counterexamples?

      The government doesn't have the tools necessary to validate this counter-example. It is clear from the governments desire to get at the logs of google searches they do not have access to google. Otherwise the government could determine from their own firewall and server logs the rate of pr0n links returned from innocuous searches.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    4. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Right. But Jack Thompson is not a police officer, nor have his past comments led me to think he is even remotely experienced with the subject, or even really a good lawyer (if he were, he would recognize the fallacy of correlation and provide some evidence to back up his claims.) The police will often sieze anything they can get their hands on, whether it is useful or not.

      I'm willing to bet the only reason they bothered talking to Jack about this was to get him to say something outrageous so that Slashdot and every videogame website on the net would link to the original article, thus turning a routine story about an open-and-shut murder case into a net scandal which generates pageviews for the author's site. They used him as much as they used sites like Slashdot.

    5. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Intron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It could happen totally by accident. Here are two examples:

      "Oh man, I shot Marvin in the face." - Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction

      "It was one of the worst days of my life." - Dick Cheney on Fox

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    6. Re:Google stats are meaningless by mrferrier · · Score: 2, Informative

      A Google search for:

      "shot in the face"

      Returns 759,000 right now. However a search for:

      "shot in the face" -game -hitman

      Returns 244,000. So the claim that "We see nary a video game or a hitman among them" is suspect.

      Better yet:

      "shot in the face" -game -movie -hitman -cheney -soldier

      Returns just 143,000.

    7. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In this case the claim is that there exists no person who shoots someone in the face and is not a hitman and is not a gamer - so what's required to debunk that claim is a counterexample (someone who shoots someone in the face and is neither a hitman nor a gamer), and only one is logically required;

      Which makes it trivial.

      Crooks of all sorts have been routinely shooting for the face since a media blitz made them aware that essentially all police (and some civilians) are routinely wearing kevlar bullet-resistant vests.

      Interestingly, the media blitz was part of the gun-ban movment's "cop-killer bullets" hysteria. The so-called cop-killer bullets were teflon coated - not to pentrate vests - but to avoid barrel wear. In fact:
        - The teflon coating didn't help them penetrate vests.
        - Essentially nobody but cops HAD them. (The particular bullet that started the flap was intended to penetrate sheet metal rather than bouncing off into bystanders or back at the shooter - an important matter when somebody is shooting at you from inside a car or through a little window in a fire door.)
        - No such bullet had ever killed a cop.
        - Police organizations PLEADED with the the media NOT to go on with this kick and thus inform the crooks that they were bullet resistant on the core body and unprotected on the head - and were ignored.

      So now head shots are routine - BECAUSE of the media. (Using them in a video game is just adding a touch of realism.) So of course (as with violent TV programs and movies inspiring copycats) media operators want to deflect criticism toward their major competitors: video games, graphic novels, police procedural fiction, and the internet.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    8. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      ... media operators want to deflect criticism toward their major competitors: ...

      Also police procedural non-fiction.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    9. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or porn-star.

    10. Re:Google stats are meaningless by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      First off, it was Vincent Vega who shot Marvin, not Jules. But no, ya gotta blame the brutha. I see how you is.

      Second, considering that Vega was a hitman, and Cheney is an avid gamer (what, you didn't know?) this isn't the best set of counter-examples.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    11. Re:Google stats are meaningless by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      "Police who have experience with crime probably have a somewhat better perspective on the hows and whys of crime than you Joe Searchbot does."


      Now that is just too funny. Some fun Googling terms to expand your horizons and education: "satanic panic", "heavy metal backwards masking", "day care centre child abuse rings", "recovered memory syndrome". Hyper aggressive police forces and district attorneys have proven themselves among those with the least common sense perspective on these issues.

    12. Re:Google stats are meaningless by griblik · · Score: 1

      The really scary part is that when I tried that search, I got 13,000,000 results, implying that somewhat over 12 million /.ers have already quoted your figure...

      --
      Warning: May contain nuts
    13. Re:Google stats are meaningless by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Well, I shoot people in the "face". But then, I was a hitman before I was a gamer, so...

      (That's a joke, people.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    14. Re:Google stats are meaningless by identity0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You, sir, are a genius for somehow linking Samuel L. Jackson, the most badass gangsta on film, and Dick Cheney, the palest, stiffest Vice-President of The United States ever - and having it be totally on-topic! And modded Insightful! I salute you, good sir.

      However, I should point out that it was, in fact, the John Travolta character who shot Marvin in the face. I will not even attempt to think about the implications of a John Travolta-Dick Cheney connection, which would be truely frightening.

      Now for a on-topic addition:

      "Oh sorry, didn't mean to shoot you in the face yet" - Ron Jeremy
      "Mr. Arafat? Hey, guess what I'm doing right now!" - Bill Clinton

    15. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      I filed that comment under "BOGUS" as soon as I read it. Having once lived in a small town with a high crime rate, I read about bar shootings almost weekly that contained the phrase "Shot in the face".

      Seems to me people naturally aim at the face in a fight, either to throw a punch, or fire a handgun.
      Hitmen on the other hand, seem to like putting bullets in the back of the head and then disappear into the crowd.

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
    16. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Samuel L. Jackson is also the voice actor for the lead black cop ("Officer Tenpenny") in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas.

      (Even though it was Travolta's character that killed Marvin, this is deliciously on topic. ;-)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    17. Re:Google stats are meaningless by andphi · · Score: 1

      You've forgotten Albertus Gorus, the "12th-Level" Vice President.

    18. Re:Google stats are meaningless by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      And apparently, Douchebag Thompson has never seen The Professional. If he had, he'd know a good hitman never shoots for the face, because then the target is difficult to identify. You aim for the gut to stun and then aim for the lungs and heart.

      At least, that's what the movie said (IANAH- I Am Not a Hitman)

    19. Re:Google stats are meaningless by Korvar · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind, with '"shot in the face" -game -hitman' you'll exclude pages that contain something like: "He was shot in the face, but police later determined the shooter wasn't a hitman or a gamer."

      --
      Korvar the Fox!! www.korvar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
  6. which is the vice president then? by Surt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hitman, or gamer? Hitman might be pretty accurate, I guess.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:which is the vice president then? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      He's obviously a gamer; gaming for actual game.

      I guess we need to pass laws against these dangerous M-rated outdoor hunting games that encourage over-aged gamers to shoot their partners in the face, then blame "hunter's tunnel vision" for their own carelessness.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  7. Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A real gamer wouldn't even be strong enough to lift the gun.

    1. Re:Please. by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

      It depends no whether or not he plays with the Wii.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    2. Re:Please. by sk8dork · · Score: 1

      what about us gamers that learned how to shoot people in the face from Time-Crisis? sure, it's not as heavy, but holding the blue/pink gun steady for hours definitely trains the right muscles for shooting people in the face.

      --
      ...all cock-blockery aside...
    3. Re:Please. by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      Pretty unlikely since it just came out 4 or 5 months from now.

      But seriously, I'm far from the first person to say this, but if you think politicians are a pain in the ass now, wait until the Wii hits US shores. God knows what would happen if Jacko ever saw the newest Wii commercial/trailer where you tilt the wii-mote (ie sword) to slice someone's neck. Only two types of people would tilt a sword to slice someone's neck: swordsman, and gamers.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    4. Re:Please. by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      looks like we've got a new meme on our hands....

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Please. by Browncoat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Only two types of people would tilt a sword to slice someone's neck: swordsman, and gamers.

      There can only be one, Highlander!

      --
      "Curse your sudden, but inevitable betrayal!"
    6. Re:Please. by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if they owned a first gen-Xbox controller?

    7. Re:Please. by itak.karstaag · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall reading this out of the guncon instruction manual (and forgive me if I paraphrase):

      Please don't remove the wire to make this look like a real gun.
      Please don't paint this black to make it look like a real gun.
      Please don't take this outside your house as it may be mistaken for a real gun.
      Please don't point this at people as it my be mistaken for a real gun.

      Here's an idea: Let's all go to our local insert video game store here and pick up a copy of Time Crisis 3 for the guncon in the box. If you're cheap you can steal one from the arcade (those are nice and heavy). We'll then march to Washington DC, Louisiana, or wherever the hell good old Jack is at the time and bludgeon him to death with the combined might of our orange plastic pistols.

      Better yet, we're all a (mostly) smart bunch. Let's see someone distribute a modified version of Time Crisis that replaces the sissy bad guy with the equally sissy Mr. Thompson.

    8. Re:Please. by Pzychotix · · Score: 1

      Hmm... If they trained on one all day, they could theoretically pick up the world. Nothing could stop one that can wield such a large item with ease.

    9. Re:Please. by knifey · · Score: 1

      But they'd have amazingly dextrous trigger fingers. Only hitmen and Americans shoot people in the face? :. lock up all Americans? Only people with guns shoot people in the face? :. Lock up all the gun owners (more fun than just locking up the guns).

  8. 921,000 Results... by smbarbour · · Score: 4, Funny

    But how many are "gun-related"? I can think of a 3 letter word that would precede "shot" that would account for that number of hits.

    1. Re:921,000 Results... by commander_gallium · · Score: 5, Funny

      But how many are "gun-related"? I can think of a 3 letter word that would precede "shot" that would account for that number of hits.

      gun?

    2. Re:921,000 Results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      well, you got the middle letter right at least..

    3. Re:921,000 Results... by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

      So can I, and, this being a lame play on words joke, it should probably follow this post

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    4. Re:921,000 Results... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      "This is my rifle (points to firearm), this is my gun (points to crotch); this is for shooting (points to firearm), this is for fun (points to crotch)" - hows that for using "gun" and still getting pictures not relevant to the /. article?

    5. Re:921,000 Results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cum on now, you MUST be able to think of a better answer than "gun"!

    6. Re:921,000 Results... by jwiegley · · Score: 1

      Sort of...

      --
      I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
    7. Re:921,000 Results... by mmalove · · Score: 1

      Rim?

      (By the way, I love the /. 14 second wait period on submitting a comment. About as much as the 5 day wait period. Typed this since I have the extra time...)

      --
      You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  9. Cheney plays videogames? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Funny

    C'mon, I can't believe that Dick plays videogames, although it would make sense if he were playing Age of Empires, Warcraft, and the like. I haven't shot anyone in the face. Yet.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by rwven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You just hit the nail on the head. If gamers shoot people in the face, why is it that there are hundreds of millions of gamers and only a handful of them have murdered someone...let alone by shooting them in the face.

    2. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 4, Funny
      You just hit the nail on the head. If gamers shoot people in the face, why is it that there are hundreds of millions of gamers and only a handful of them have murdered someone...

      The stats are very much skewed: Stealth games like Metal Gear Solid are getting very popular, so they clearly still go on random murdering sprees; they just got -alot- better at disposing of the bodies/evidence. :D

      Off topic; The [p] -tag now just acts like putting in a linebreak [br] : Weird stuff.

    3. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if, statistically, gamers are more likely to commit murder than non-gamers.

      Why doesn't someone just figure out that statistic and then we'll have an answer to whether games promote violence? Oh, because that would be the logical, non-fearmongering thing to do.

    4. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just looked at the murderers that played games and ones that didn't, all you would see is a correlation and not a cause.

      If you saw statistically that people that part their hair to the right commited more murders than people that parted their hair to the left, would that mean that parting your hair to the right promoted violence.

      This isn't something that plain numbers proves or disproves.

    5. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      There have been hundreds of cases of people shooting people in the face before computers even existed. People have thown acid in people's faces, people have done all sorts of violent things to one another. People are just looking for a scapegoat for violence in our society. Games, guns, whatever. it's all someone else's fault.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      Even if it proved to be true, what does that prove? Does it mean that games make people more likely to become murderers, or does murder make people more likely to become gamers? And besides, isn't the key demographic of Sony and MS right now 18-34 year old males? I'm fairly certain that'd be the age and gender of most western violent crimes.

      Correlation does not imply causality.

    7. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by amazon10x · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You just hit the nail on the head. If gamers shoot people in the face, why is it that there are hundreds of millions of gamers and only a handful of them have murdered someone...let alone by shooting them in the face.

      He said that all people who shoot someone in the face are either hitmen or gamers. He did not say that all gamers will shoot someone in the face.

      Offtopic: This new layout sucks; When I read a comment I have to bring my eyes all the way to the other side of the screen to see what it has been moderated as. Is there anyway to go back to the classic version?

    8. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is it that there are hundreds of millions of gamers and only a handful of them have murdered someone...

      I think wacko Jacko T is attempting to encourage more murders - well his at any rate!!! Slashdot should filter out any news about this news obsessed dickhead radical - only then will he die. Jack if you are reading this I wish you well.... ;-)

    9. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Thank you for reminding me that a correlation does not necessarily indicate a cause! It's been at least an hour since someone mentioned that on Slashdot....

      A correlation indicates either a causal relationship or common causation by a third factor. No correlation indicates no causal relationship.

      Don't you think it would be interesting to know whether there is even the possibility of a causal relationship between playing violent games and committing murders? You know, before assuming it and enacting a bunch of laws?

      Even in the other case, wouldn't it be interesting to know if there WAS a correlation, even if it was caused by a third factor? Then you could use other methods to determine what that factor was.

    10. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, what? Regardless if your point is valid or not, it has nothing to do with Dick Cheney jokes. Apart from that, it's also a non sequitir. The fact that few gamers shoot people doesn't mean that games didn't influence those that did. I don't think they did, I'm just pointing out that your logic is about as valid as Monty Python.

    11. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      Re your offtopic comment, I like the layout, but I hate the wide kerning. It's nasty to read. Really, really nasty. It feels like reading in slow motion.

    12. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hey, another one! See my reply to the other "correlation does not imply causality" guy.

      It seems to be fashionable (except among gamers) to just assume that there IS a causal relationship between games and violence without even a correlation to back it up. What an interesting result it would be if there WAS no correlation.

    13. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by sorak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder if, statistically, gamers are more likely to commit murder than non-gamers.
      Why doesn't someone just figure out that statistic and then we'll have an answer to whether games promote violence? Oh, because that would be the logical, non-fearmongering thing to do.

      And because that would be like trying to figure out if people who watch television commit violence. Twenty years ago, games were toys and gamers were a small subset of the population. now they have become mainstream entertainment. I'd probably wonder more about the family that __doesn't__ have a video game system, because they are probably of low socioeconomic status, living in a bad neighborhood, where shooting someone in the face is a career move, or they are either hippies or amish. Either way, they do not represent a state of "normal" that we would return to if we just threw our televisions away.

    14. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a better browser tia

    15. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate the wide kerning.

      My pet peeve is the extra horizontal space between lines, but I think they have the same root cause:

      The text is too damn small to be legible without them.

      PLEASE can we have an alternate stylesheet that respects our browser font settings?

    16. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Agreed, you wouldn't want to use a yes/no scale. Better to estimate their time spent gaming per week (say, on a five point scale) then see if increased gaming correlates with increased likelihood to shoot someone in the face. If you DID see a correlation you could go back and look to see if the rate of shooting-people-in-the-face has increased with the growth of the gaming industry or not.

    17. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by jimktrains · · Score: 1

      I play commander keen (http://www.commander-keen.com/) (one of my favorite from my childhood and I still play, I'll admit it, even thought I beat avery game:-p), obviously this type (dos side scoller) can be counted in such a study... Pong, pac man, arcade games too can't. I think it's a little more complecated then "how much do you play video games." Maybe "How much do you play violent video games" But then I'm sure there is a grey area where a game is violent to some and not others...

      --
      "You will do foolish things, but do them with enthusiasm." - S. G. Colette
    18. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      Lies and statistics, they can force a correlation through numbers and polls. They're always right, at least until it either becomes socially acceptible to be a gamer or games are crushed like comic books were under the Comics Code.

    19. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Look like I was a little later in posting.

      But anyway, I understand your interest in seeing the results of such a study, but here's the problem: I, as a gamer, have not felt any more aggressive after playing a video game than I have after, say, one of my Tae Kwon Do lessons. I know plenty of gamers who are violent, sure, but I know plenty of people who are violent (in the, will fight people for fun) who are not gamers (at least, dedicated. Maybe they play GTA on the weekends, but nothing so time-consuming). This suggests to me that games have no affect on aggression, or at least no more than ANY activity that gets your adrenaline flowing. I mean, studies have shown that football players are aggressive after a game, because of the adrenaline. But do people question putting restrictions on sports? Of course not.

      However, if such a study came out, it is of my opinion, and only my opinion, that gamers would show a SLIGHT increase in aggressive tendancies, mostly due to adrenaline again, which would send the media and congress into a fresh uproar of "Games taught my kid to kill!"

      Or to put it more simply, I see few benefits from such a study, but plenty of ways it could be abused.

    20. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by whoop · · Score: 1

      Naw, Commandos taught me the importance of hiding dead bodies well before Metal Gear Solid.

    21. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by shotfeel · · Score: 2

      Why doesn't someone just figure out that statistic and then we'll have an answer

      They have! (that was the first link I found to the story/study).

      Researchers from the University of Oklahoma recently found that two-thirds of school fights were instigated by regular video game players, but only 4% were started by children who had never played such games.

      Two-thirds started by regular video game players! Only 4% by kids who never played such games! Fast, ban them! Ban them NOW!

      But wait, aren't like 80% of kids regular video game players? And they're only responsible for 67% of incidents? Is it possible only 2% of kids have never played such a game??? That means non-gamers are significanlty more likely (per individual) to instigate fights! We need new school programs fast to make kids play more video games! Somebody call the press!

      Note: I have yet to find a reference to the above study that actually mentions what % of kids in the study were "regular video game players". Nobody seems to realize the results are meaningless without that.

    22. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

      Return to Castle Wolfenstein on the old C64 - had to sneak up and knife the guard from behind then drag him to the closet. Didn't want the other guards sounding the alarm

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    23. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      For a good comparison I think you'd want to pick the most violent of the fairly widespread consumer games, say ones like GTA and Hitman (they get all the press anyway). Exclude anyone who plays the gray area games and put the definitely non-violent gamers in the "non-violent and no gaming" group.

      There are all kinds of things you have to think about when you're designing any kind of study. My point is that I don't think anyone's done anything like it. If they have then both sides seem to be afraid to cite any actual evidence.

    24. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's why I didn't suggest a study that asks gamers "do you feel more aggressive after playing?" Those kind of studies HAVE been done and DO show increased aggression after playing games. There's a big jump between that (which, as you say, can be observed in lots of activities) and going out and shooting someone.

      Rather than having all these "this kid shot someone in the face and also owned games!" anecdotes which are frankly just as damaging as a positive study would be, let's have some hard evidence. I've got a pretty good idea that it would show that gamers are not significantly more likely to kill people than non-gamers. If it didn't, and followup studies established that games actually do promote violence, then we DO need controls on them. Both sides saying let's not do any real studies because we're afraid they'll disagree with us isn't going to help anybody.

    25. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Okay, if I didn't say it in my first post then I'll amend it here: a GOOD study.

    26. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Exactly... I'd be willing to bet that child also owned... SCHOOL BOOKS!

      HO NOS!! teh skols wif books make chilren to killZ!!

    27. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Shush. Don't give them any ideas. I expect some people would LOVE to take away books. Starting with science books and anything that mentions magic.

    28. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Exclude anyone who plays the gray area games and put the definitely non-violent gamers in the "non-violent and no gaming" group.

      But how do you know that playing Tetris doesn't make you frustrated and likely to kill someone ? You can't simply assume data about the thing you're trying to examine. You'll need to rate each datapoint (gamer) by both how much he played per day and how violent game he played. And, of course, how murderous he acted ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    29. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you wanted to know about games in general. The purpose of this study is to put to rest the violent games cause violence debate so we want to consider violent game players vs. everybody else. If we introduced how violent is the game as another variable, as you suggest, we could still answer the original question and the more general one but it would cost more because we'd have to collect detailed information on exactly which games the subjects played.

    30. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, many people drive drunk yet few drunk drivers have killed someone.

      The cases are different, as there is a demonstrable causal link between drunk driving and accidents, but none has been demonstrated for gaming. Yet, anyway; it's not inherently implausible.

    31. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Because Jack Thompson fucks his mother, thats why!

    32. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      My gawd.... look what videogames have done to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      I'm so sorry Jack Thompson, and Momma Thompson... please continue assaulting our freedom per your own free will.

    33. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by prentiz · · Score: 1

      Or if mad Jack is right, no-one would have been shot in the face, by anyone other than a hired assassin. http://www.members.tripod.com/candst/boston3.htm This page taken at random from googling "shot in the face" "nineteenth century" describes how a chap was shot in the face during sectarian rioting in Boston in 1844 - rather hard to argue he was motivated by Grand Theft Auto...

    34. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by boarsai · · Score: 1

      I cry bullshit, I'd have shot him in the nuts with a remington. Tis what I do in games when someone really shits me off. Nothing satisfies me more then the physics engine in full flight with a groin shot to someone who pissed me off.

    35. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by tatersalad · · Score: 1

      Ahh, mister soup nazi, how well you know me. I personally stalk people for the heck of it, but I use the half-life approach of running around with a crowbar, whacking whatever pops out of a dimensional warp near me. IN THE FACE. That's right, I hit them IN THE FACE! The video games made me do it.

    36. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      That's an important thing that a lot of people seem to be missing.

      Hitlers Holocaust? Stalins Purges? Maos Great Leap Forward? Before PONG.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    37. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by BeardsmoreA · · Score: 1

      Nobody hits the nail on the head... Unless they're a Carpenter or a Videogamer.

    38. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Hitler got all his ideas from playing Wolfenstein 3D. That is an evil wicked horrible game.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    39. Re:Cheney plays videogames? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of anything that directly addresses the question that's been published. I'm not even sure the study I mentioned has actually been published yet, all it took was the press release to cause a firestorm.

  10. Thompson is a Moron. by Vo0k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every gamer and hitman knows you shoot in the BACK of the head!

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps someone needs to demonstrate it for him.

    2. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by MrSquirrel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now now, violence is not the answer. Public humiliation is much more fun. I can't wait til his supporters realize what a whacko he is:
      "In 2006, two Michigan gamers began a project dubbed "Flowers for Jack", soliciting donations to deliver a massive floral arrangement to Thompson's office. The flowers were delivered in February along with a letter aimed at opening a dialogue between Thompson and the video gaming community. Thompson responded by forwarding the flowers to some of his industry foes, with such comments as "Discard them along with the decency you discarded long ago. I really don't care. Grind them up and smoke them if you like."
      In 1992 Thompson faced disbarment over allegations that he lied while making accusation against prominent Dade County lawyer Stuart Grossman. He'll do whatever he has to in order to accomplish his goals.
      The man is ignorant, uncooperative, and a lawyer... but he can still be broken -- if he became disbarred, lost his fandom, and studies were released proving that there is no link between videogames and violence... that would be a fate for him worse than death.
      P.S. If you do want to shoot him, don't add fuel to the fire -- get a hitman who's never played a videogame :) thank you

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    3. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by Billosaur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The man is ignorant, uncooperative, and a lawyer... but he can still be broken -- if he became disbarred, lost his fandom, and studies were released proving that there is no link between videogames and violence... that would be a fate for him worse than death.

      No, if any of that happens, he will simply become a politician and run for Congress. He's a fanatic, and fanatics rarely back down, even when proved wrong. Look at all these Doomsday cults where the "leader" predicts the end of the world and miraculously, it never comes. Do their "followers" abandon them? No -- they believe the new tripe the leader makes up to explain why his prediction comes true. See? Same thing as politics...

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    4. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      That's why I threw that p.s. in there, because even after hearing my own arguement, I still wanted to kill him (but I can't because I'm a gamer and then he would have revenge from beyond the grave through his followers). Wait... solution! If we held a "Jack Thompson and fan club" convention and then firebombed the whole place -- bam, no more problems.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    5. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by A-Trav · · Score: 0

      Your partially correct. A hitman only aims for the face when the shot will be powerful enough to destroy the primary functions of the brain (side, between the eyes, and back in most cases). However, the primary organ that a hitman would target is the heart (if he/she is not wearing a bulletproof vest). This is because the victim needs to have his blood completely circulating within about twenty seconds (average person) of the destruction of his heart and shooting the victim in the face may not even damage the brain (ie: mouth, cheeks, nose from side).

    6. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There was an "Addams Family" episode - the old black-and-white TV series - where Uncle Fester, in his outrage at someone, grabs his gun and announces his solution: "I'll shoot him in the back!"

      In this episode, Morticia responds, "Now, now, Uncle Fester, you'll do no such thing."

      "In the side?" suggests Fester.

      "No," Morticia answers firmly. "We shall settle this issue through legal channels."

      Fester looks doubtful. "Shooting's safer," he points out.

      Sometimes I agree with Fester.

      --
      Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
    7. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by aitikin · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC He has been disbarred in Florida, he's lost a number of his fandom, but not nearly enough of it, and there have been studies proving there is no link between videogames and violence, while at the same time there have been studies proving the opposite. As for the hitman...we're working on it.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    8. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by AdamD1 · · Score: 1

      if he became disbarred, lost his fandom, and studies were released proving that there is no link between videogames and violence... that would be a fate for him worse than death.

      You mean a report like this one? [Violent Video Games: Myths, Facts, and Unanswered Questions, written by Craig A. Anderson, PhD, Psychology.]

      In a nutshell it purports:

      - Violent videogames lead to increased aggressive behavior and thoughts
      - High exposure to these games has been linked to delinquency, fighting at school, and violent criminal behavior
      - Studies with college students have consistently found increased aggression after exposure to clearly unrealistic and fantasy violent video games.
      - The effect is probably much more widespread than his report implies, just due to sample sizes.

      It's an interesting read.

      I am not anti-videogames, or even anti-violent-videogames. Just that there are dozens of these reports around. Seeing consistent violence, cartoonish or otherwise, does have an effect on people, especially young people. It's just that it's not often (yet) that it's manifested in someone's actual outward behavior.

      Also: Thompson is a Moron. Or at least sounds like one.

      ad

      --
      Because I can! [Brainrub.com]
    9. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by karandago · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, to truly humiliate Thompson would be to get a picture of him pre-ordering GTA4.

    10. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, a "Myth vs Fact" analysis of several studies pertaining to the link between videogaming and violence, done by the person who was a co-researcher on 8 of the 10 studies the article was based upon? No chance of bias there...

    11. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      "It's not for me, it's for the uhhh... children... uh... they... they threatened to shoot me in the face if I didn't, honest!"

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    12. Re:Thompson is a Moron. by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      and studies were released proving that there is no link between videogames and violence...


      You mean like this one?
      http://www.gamerevolution.com/oldsite/articles/vio lence/violence.htm
  11. Hitmen? by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since when do hitmen execute people by shooting them in the face? Back of the head/neck is traditional.

    Jack don't know anything.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Hitmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when do hitmen execute people by shooting them in the face? Back of the head/neck is traditional.

      Its kinda funny, but while your comments do debunk his argument about gamers being violent, it seems like a very hollow victory.

    2. Re:Hitmen? by yarbo · · Score: 1

      If you shoot a person in the face he can't have an open casket funeral.

    3. Re:Hitmen? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I once went to a thanatological exhibition where they demonstrated facial reconstruction of severe facial trauma victims for open casket funerals.

      I skipped lunch that day.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Hitmen? by fallen1 · · Score: 1
      Jack don't know anything.


      My apologies if you were being polite, but I believe what you were looking for is this:
      Jack don't know SHIT.

      I believe that pretty much sums up Jack Thompson's total knowledge base. ;-)

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    5. Re:Hitmen? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I believe what you were looking for is this:
      Jack don't know SHIT.


      I initially wrote it as that, but I realised that all Jack knows is bullshit, so I reworded it ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Hitmen? by baKanale · · Score: 1

      In The Godfather Michael Corleone has Moe Greene shot in the face. Right in the eye, if memory serves. There's also a scene where Clemenza explains to Michael how he should shoot Sollozzo and McCluskey in the head ("Twice in the head and you know he's dead"). But then again, that's just the movies.

      But I guess games aren't the only way to learn how to kill. I wonder, if video games are "murder simulators" (at least according to Jack Thompson), then are violent movies "murder instructional videos"?

    7. Re:Hitmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Jack don't know anything."

      You mean he doesn't know Jack Shit?

    8. Re:Hitmen? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      if video games are "murder simulators" (at least according to Jack Thompson), then are violent movies "murder instructional videos"?

      And Tom Clancy produces Murder Manuals! He must be stopped! Or else!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  12. I play FPS by flyneye · · Score: 0

    I would never shoot someone in the face in real life,barring necessity.
    Much better to give them "buckwheats"(Things to do in Denver when youre dead) even if only in your minds eye.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  13. IN THE FACE!!! by rwven · · Score: 1

    Funny... I'm sure historically plenty of people in wartime have been shot or shot people in the face and i'm reasonably sure the vast majority of them were not videogamers or "hitmen." Heck, the movies and TV portray people getting "shot in the face" all the time.

    We can only hope the Judge and Jury in this trial are not too stupid to see the error of a statement like that. While the accused does deserve his "reward" for his crimes, i think blaming games for this is utterly ridiculous. People need to start taking responsibility for their actions.

    1. Re:IN THE FACE!!! by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Depends what you mean by "hitmen". Military personnel are professional killers, so to the extent there's a difference between them and hitmen, it's a subtle one.

    2. Re:IN THE FACE!!! by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1
      The way you capitalized Judge and Jury... I thought it said Judge Judy.

      Which is about where this case should end up.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    3. Re:IN THE FACE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Current weapons training for the M-9 pistol in one of the military services teaches firing 2 rounds to the chest, and a third round to the head. In the past, it was just 2 rounds to the chest.

    4. Re:IN THE FACE!!! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Military personnel are professional killers, so to the extent there's a difference between them and hitmen, it's a subtle one.

      No it isn't. Military professionals do not hire themselves out to kill a specific person for a sum of money. They aren't really rewarded for their ability to kill either. Subduing and holding an area with minimal loss of life is generally seen as preferrable.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:IN THE FACE!!! by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      That's really just the difference between a salaried employee and an independent contractor.

  14. which games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd like to get copies of them since they sound pretty awesome!

  15. Re:Cue the Dick Cheney jokes - but seriously by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    No, sorry, it's Bush that plays Duck Hunt.

    Dick Cheney plays Doom 3.

    How to tell the difference:

    Bush would shoot in the face.

    Cheney would aim for the heart. ...

    now, seriously, seizing games as "evidence" of a murder only makes sense if:

    a. you watch way too much CSI: Miami (yes, I loved that the young woman was the winner); or
    b. you find blood spattered on the game; or
    c. you are trying to get media attention for a pretty flimsy case.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  16. The proof this is false... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Funny

    A videogamer could never shoot someone in the face - there isn't a "crosshair" to aim with in real life....

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
    1. Re:The proof this is false... by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      ...that and you can't pick up a gun in the corner of the room as it hovers and spins a foot off the ground. And don't even get me started on finding ammunition for the damn thing.

    2. Re:The proof this is false... by Robotron23 · · Score: 1

      There is often a crosshair if one uses a sniper rifle with a mounted scope; telescopic or not.

      Furthermore, some pistols and sidearms can be mounted with scopes/laser sights too. /pedantry

    3. Re:The proof this is false... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Add to that the difficulty in finding a reliable aimbot in rl.

    4. Re:The proof this is false... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      obviously you've never played a "realism" mod for any game where they insist on removing crosshairs and making you use ironsights for any hope of your shots hitting something that'll matter (somebody, cept theyr pixels n polygons)

      seriously though, what do you think a guy like me would find so hard about pulling a handgun up, aiming down the sights, and squeezing without flinching (set your aim off) - or holding a rifle square in your shoulder, aiming down the sights, holding his breath, and squeezing again without flinching?

      why do people act like its so damned hard to shoot a gun - its not... now shooting with a person in front of the barrel and living with it - thats a different story - you could go to a shooting range all the time, be an olympic class marksman, and it'd still drive you to a mental ward...

    5. Re:The proof this is false... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Obviously you have never heard of the "humor" mod for reality..

      Nope, shooting a gun is easy, hitting the target consistently is what is hard...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    6. Re:The proof this is false... by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      "why do people act like its so damned hard to shoot a gun..."
      Shooting a gun is not hard. Hitting your intended target (especially under the stress of a combat situation) is.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    7. Re:The proof this is false... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nope, shooting a gun is easy, hitting the target consistently is what is hard...
      That depends totally on the range.
    8. Re:The proof this is false... by sco08y · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (Not an expert marksman by any means, but I can hit what I shoot at...)

      seriously though, what do you think a guy like me would find so hard about pulling a handgun up, aiming down the sights,

      You forgot to get a proper stance.

      and squeezing without flinching (set your aim off)

      You forgot breathing. (Not to mention loading the damned thing...)

      - or holding a rifle square in your shoulder,

      Err... did you zero that rifle? And, again, you need proper posture whether you're standing up, in the prone or sitting down.

      aiming down the sights,

      Cheek to stock weld? Sight picture?

      holding his breath, and

      Holding your breath is the opposite of what you want to do. You breath normally and after a few breaths you pause to acquire your sight picture and fire.

      squeezing again without flinching?

      Of course, since you were breathing *after* you aimed your sight picture has moved around. And you have to "follow through" as golfers say when you squeeze the trigger so that it's fully depressed.

      now shooting with a person in front of the barrel and living with it - thats a different story - you could go to a shooting range all the time, be an olympic class marksman, and it'd still drive you to a mental ward...

      As I understand, combat vets will develop PTSD after extended combat, and very few PTSD sufferers are institutionalized.

      So I'm pretty sure shooting one person isn't going to put you in the loony bin. Grief stricken, maybe, but if someone was trying to kill me I think I could handle it.

    9. Re:The proof this is false... by Korvar · · Score: 1

      Apparenly, in real life you have to bend down in order to pick stuff up, as opposed to simply walking over it. Who knew?

      --
      Korvar the Fox!! www.korvar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
  17. Actually... by Vo0k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most hitmen avoid headshots. Very messy and often with a good chance of survival of the subject. Load the brain with 5 bullets and the victim may still live, despite losing the ability to speak spanish, tell apart apples from oranges and move left leg. They will likely enter a coma though, which looks very much like they are dead, and they will come to and start talking at the least convenient moment. Real hitmen avoid headshots (from close distance at least, sniping is a different thing) and definitely prefer going for the heart. Nobody survives a hole in the heart and placing the third bullet precisely in the heart from a short distance is quite easy once shock from the first two paralyses the victim.

    On the other hand, most games register heart shot as just another chest shot, scoring pretty low damage, while headshots, from any direction, including the face count as serious damage multiplier.

    That would narrow it down... ;)

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good chance of survival? What? Show me some statistics.

      If hit in the head at least they know where they hit them (ie. in a critical area). A shot to the chest can bounce of bones and go anywhere. It's not like you can see inside someone's chest to know exactly the size, shape, and position of the heart and/or arteries.

    2. Re:Actually... by Abstract_Me · · Score: 0

      I thought they went for the chest so that their hit could be properly identified and thus they would get paid.

    3. Re:Actually... by RSquaredW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cue Lost, season 1:
      "I was aiming for his heart."
      "Well, you missed."

      The only thing I can think of the OP referring to is the phenomenon where the bullet skims the cranium underneath the skin, popping out the other side and giving the victim a hell of a headache. Tends to happen with low-powered rounds that literally richochet off the skull. It's a freakish enough occurance that I doubt you'd avoid shooting someone in the head.

      It is true, however, that self-defense courses do not teach to aim for the head; it's a small target, and you're not going for style points. I remember being asked, "When do you stop firing in a self defense situation?"

      The answer? "When the magazine is empty."

      --
      In accordance with E.O. 12958, this post is marked Unclassified.
    4. Re:Actually... by slashflood · · Score: 5, Funny

      Note to myself: never mark Vo0k as foe.

    5. Re:Actually... by RSquaredW · · Score: 1

      By the way, there's this little thing called 'body armor' and the enemies in most games are wearing it. It tends to cover your chest and protect against this dreaded 'heart shot' that you speak of. On the other hand, the head is rarely protected as well as the ceramic-and-kevlar chest, and thus receives a damage bonus. Especially attentive developers will place different damage values on the helmet and the unprotected areas of the head - I believe Goldeneye had a few enemies with good helmets.

      Also, I imagine that anyone who is, in fact, shot in the face will not be shooting back at you any time soon. I believe the first reaction to such an event is often to fall down and/or seek out medical attention to replace a missing nose.

      --
      In accordance with E.O. 12958, this post is marked Unclassified.
    6. Re:Actually... by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Both from a statistical and vital areas point of view, shooting someone in the chest will serve both points very well. Firstly, if you miss shooting someone straight in the heart, you'll still hit them in the chest, where, if you miss the head, they don't get shot. Secondly, all you need to do is double tap them in the chest, and they're probably done for. Then go up and shoot em right in the head, and not only are you 99% sure of killing them, but it looks wicked cool.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    7. Re:Actually... by wickedj · · Score: 1

      The other reason hitmen avoid headshots is due to prooving the kill. If you blow away the face, the body could be anybody.

    8. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      A good way to remember this is "Once for business, once for fun". Chest first, then head.

      This is why special forces use burst fire. They aim for the center of mass, and then let the gun track up for the rest of the shots. It's very effective.

      What's really funny is that you don't learn this from a video game. The only people who would shoot someone in the face are average citizens - that is, extremely unprofessional / inefficient killers - which is a pretty strong argument against Jack Thompson as it is.

    9. Re:Actually... by pedalman · · Score: 1
      Also, I imagine that anyone who is, in fact, shot in the face will not be shooting back at you any time soon. I believe the first reaction to such an event is often to fall down and/or seek out medical attention to replace a missing nose.
      Indeed. Just ask Michael Jackson. http://www.snopes.com/photos/jackson.asp
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    10. Re:Actually... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      except that except for higher end body armor, even medium grade brand new "Spectra" (supposedly better than kevlar) body armor will at largest caliber stop a .44 magnum and 12 gauge (cant remember if it includes 00 buck or not, doubt it though). so basically all those guys with AKs, M16s/M4s, etc, and large caliber handguns (no I'm not talking about .50AE IMI Desert Eagle, I mean something (lesser known, albeit) that would use .454, .460, .470, .475, .480, and .500 s&w - thats just for handguns) are oughta go right through that body armor...

    11. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      See the Guns section of this page for an illustration of the above statement.

      On second thoughts, if you want to eat at any time soon, don't.

    12. Re:Actually... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I would rather care about his list of foes.

      Oh crap. And it has only 5 other folks left, too :p

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    13. Re:Actually... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
      The answer? "When the magazine is empty."
      I was told to never let that happen. Always leave a couple of rounds in the magazine when you're "done" firing off. I don't recall why, but it had to do with the legal aftermath.
    14. Re:Actually... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I remember being asked, "When do you stop firing in a self defense situation?" The answer? "When the magazine is empty."

      Well, that makes sense. It's a rare firearm that allows you to reload and fire at the same time...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Actually... by jwiegley · · Score: 2, Informative

      IANAHM: While I agree a perforated cardiac muscle is nearly 100% fatal I would argue that a direct head shot is equally fatal (possibly more so).

      I found this article http://www.jhu.edu/~jhumag/0406web/shock.html about a trauma surgeon's experiences with gunshot victims in several urban areas. Most notable to support my belief are two passages:

      "The thing we're looking for when we slash the chest open is a bullet injury to the heart where the bleeding has been only in a modest amount, but it's accumulating inside" the heart, Cornwell explains. "Then he's in cardiac arrest not because he's bled out, like most gunshot victims, but because the motor can't pump anymore."

      If you're the surgeon at such a moment, what you do is simple yet sublime. You slash a hole in the human heart. You watch while the stopped-up blood spills out. Then you stick your finger over that slash like it's the proverbial hole in a dike, and you race to an operating room where you sew up the heart you just slashed, only by now it's thumping stronger and steadier with each stitch.

      Which leads me to believe that a reasonably large number of cardiac perforations are not fatal. In fact there seems to be a routine, if slightly barbaric, method for restoring the hydraulic functionality of the heart and that the perforation does not, in itself, disable the heart.

      "No new medicine or advance in surgical technique will ever save a patient with a direct gunshot wound to the head,"

      And that leads me to believe that at least this trauma surgeon views such wounds as more hopeless. (Though his statement doesn't discriminate between the location of entry and exit points which I think might make a difference since a bullet entering the face at certain points has to travel through several layers of bone and much more soft tissue before damaging the central nervous system compared to an entry wound in the back of the head.)

      I guess, of course, that my recommendation for hitmen (or hitwomen) for obtaining the greatest chance of success is, given sufficient time and opportunity, to perform both.
      --
      I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
    16. Re:Actually... by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Parent is full of bullshit. I'd like to see some actual evidence for his claim that being shot in the head is less likely to be fatal than being shot in the torso, given the same projectile and velocity. I'm surprised no one else has called him on this yet, because it's so obviously junk science. What are his reasons for this theory? Where is the evidence?

    17. Re:Actually... by Vo0k · · Score: 1
      being shot in the head is less likely to be fatal than being shot in the torso


      Being shot in the brain vs being shot in the heart please. Shooting lungs or throat or shoulder or similar screw-ups aside, there is a slim chance of survival with a bullet in the brain. Of course this -usually- kills the victim, but in rare cases it won't. OTOH a hole in heart is not survivable at all, null, zero. Cases of surviving a piece of shrapnel in the brain are recorded and known. Cases of bullets - I didn't see any, but likely too. Find a case of a survivor with punctured heart.
      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    18. Re:Actually... by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Back of the neck will sever the spine and result in death due to suffocation.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    19. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "No new medicine or advance in surgical technique will ever save a patient with a direct gunshot wound to the head,"

      This doesn't so much indicate that a gunshot wound is neccesarily fatal. It just indicates survival isn't a factor of treatment as luck.

      Back of the neck for point blank range will do.

      Shot to the head plus as many to the body as possible for longer range.

      Someone with a bullet wound to the head may be lucky enough to survive, but treatment is hampered by other wounds. Hit enoght bits to require three specialists in the one room and the job's done.

      [just what I heard, y'know]
    20. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure, except the survivors you speak of would have to have been shot with a low caliber weapon, like a .22. If you get shot in the head with anything .32+ you're pretty much done for.

    21. Re:Actually... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Add matters of efficient silencing. Such cannons show you have a small weiner, not that you're a pro.

      Of course one of the first two bullets may be in the head. For these overzealous.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    22. Re:Actually... by redgopher · · Score: 1

      Vincent: Okay, look, here's the deal. Man, you were gonna drive me around tonight, never be the wiser, but El Gordo got in front of a window, did his high dive, we're into Plan B. Still breathing? Now we gotta make the best of it, improvise, adapt to the environment, Darwin, shit happens, I Ching, whatever man, we gotta roll with it.
      Max: I Ching? What are you talking about, man? You threw a man out of a window.
      Vincent: I didn't throw him. He *fell*
      Max: Well what did he do to you?
      Vincent: What?
      Max: What did he do to *you*?
      Vincent: Nothing. I only met him tonight.
      Max: You just met him once and you killed him like that?
      Vincent: What? I should only kill people after I get to know them?

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0369339/

      --
      Insert clever one liner here.
    23. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty bad advice, actually. I personally do not want to face a trial for a self-defence, legitimate shooting, and try to explain why I fired 17 shots. I can hear a DA now: "He fired and fired until he could literally fire no more shots into his victim!"

      The correct answer: "When the threat is abated."

      This could happen with zero shots, or after three magazines.

  18. GamePolitics? by Chrismith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that I'm doubting the validity of the article (at least, any more so than usual), but couldn't the submitter have found a more reputable source than a news blog on LiveJournal? You'd think that a real news site would have, y'know, a real news site.

    1. Re:GamePolitics? by WedgeTalon · · Score: 1

      While I'm not certain why they are still shackled to LJ (especially after how far they've locked down commenting on there), they most certainly DO have an actual site: gamepolitics.com

    2. Re:GamePolitics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.gamepolitics.com/

      But yes, the use of Livejournal is a bit tacky.

    3. Re:GamePolitics? by Browncoat · · Score: 1

      The actual article is housed at The Baton Rouge Advocate online.

      --
      "Curse your sudden, but inevitable betrayal!"
    4. Re:GamePolitics? by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      I'm a regular reader/commenter on the site, and from what I've seen, Dennis (the guy running it) is a pretty good journalist. He has free-lance columns in a couple of real newspapers, and although GamePolitics is more of a hobby for him, he's pretty good about doing his research and (for the most part) keeping his coverage objective. He's also frequently linked by blogs such as Kotaku and is occasionally quoted by the mainstream press.

      Another reason why GamePolitics is a good source for something like this is that the site's forums and screened-by-default comments are a direct result of a little trolling problem that we had with Jack Thompson. The man went through at least 50 banned LiveJournal usernames before Dennis finally got rid of him. We also periodically get other notable figures commenting, including the guy who uncovered the Hot Coffee mod, and even Hal Halpin visited for a day to answer people's questions.

      Yeah, I know I'm getting a bit fangirlish here, but even so... I'm not sure why a story like this would be any more valid coming from a "real" news site, especially given GamePolitics' reputation as a news source for all things Jack Thompson.

  19. One Question... by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One Question: when is Jack Thompson going to prison? His abuse of the legal system and profound negative influence on society has to end.

    The surest sign that the litigation indust--, er, justice system in the US is broken is that this guy hasn't been disbarred yet.

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  20. Re:Cue the Dick Cheney jokes - but seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it all depends on what your motive is ...

    If you wanted to demonstrate that a person had violent fantasies being able to show that he played FPS for 60 hours a week could be a good indicator ...

    If you wanted to demonstrate that a person had no connection to the world, were lonely and were willing to do anything to make friends (and this manifested itself violently) having a level 60, holy speced priest would be valid evidence ...

    If you just wanted to demonstrate that they were disturbed, all you have to do is show that they owned a copy of DOA: extreme beach volyball.

  21. in different news.... by pxuongl · · Score: 1

    a researcher, who had planned to do exhaustive research for his thesis, procrastinated, played starcraft, and in the end just did a google search, and then concluded that a gazillion people have been killed due to their reading the bible.

    1. Re:in different news.... by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      gazillion... does that figure include the dinosaurs? Sure the bible was written some time later, but that doesn't mean it wasn't the cause!

    2. Re:in different news.... by pxuongl · · Score: 1

      in that case, the figure would go up to a bajillion plus infinity

  22. Guns Don't Kill People, Videogames Kill People! by cyberbian · · Score: 1

    and other failed NRA taglines

    --
    if I claimed I was emperor just because some watery tart lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!
  23. Stories like this... by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

    ...make me Glad my Villian in "City of Villians" is Jackie Thompson.

    Why Jackie you ask, because the name is just different enough to avoid litigation, and since he is a assassin with martial art moves that he learned from playing "Ninja Gaiden" for 12 hours("Jackie Chan's Action Kung Fu" wouldn't fit in his bio since it rambles much like the man it spoofs), the name just suits him better too.

    1. Re:Stories like this... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      If his moves are from Ninja Gaiden, his name should be Jacquio, not Jackie!

    2. Re:Stories like this... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Nice to see someone still remembers the original NG series. *sigh*

  24. Shot in the Face by drewzhrodague · · Score: 4, Funny

    Agreed. Does that mean we can shoot Jack Thompson in the face? Maybe this is his way of expressing his need for this. Any takers?

    I can imagine a mob of gamers swarming this guy, all shooting him in the face with those Nintendo light guns.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  25. "The best weapon is a sharp mind" by Mr.+Samuel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Jack Thompson is an absurd excuse for a lawyer. The entire gamer Internet community should be well aware of this by now. His actual motivations for his war on video games probably go no further than a quest for power and publicity. Unless, of course, he's actually out of touch with reality to the extent of believing what he says.

    So what's our best defense against him? Frankly, I think the last thing Jack Thompson would want is to be ignored. He probably likes the animosity he's building with the gaming community, and he'll like making headlines many times more. Let's just ignore the fellow, and at some point he may start campaigning against diet sodas or the ulterior motives of figure skaters ("Nobody wears blades that sharp...unless they want to kill.").

    1. Re:"The best weapon is a sharp mind" by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Let's just ignore the fellow, and at some point he may start campaigning against diet sodas or the ulterior motives of figure skaters"

      I'm sure he likes the animosity somewhat. But gamers are not who Jack is targeting for action -- he is targeting non-gamers to get them to pass laws we (in general) do not like.

      If *everyone* would ignore him, he'd no longer be a pest. But the major problem is that there are plenty of people who either agree with his opinions, or too apathetic to disagree with him. So, if you want Jack gone, you've got to play his game and beat him at it -- make sure Joe Sixpack understands that games don't kill people, irresponsible parents and unstable kids and easy access to guns and a ton of other factors (and sometimes just accidents!) kill people.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:"The best weapon is a sharp mind" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      So what's our best defense against him?

      Shooting him in the face?

    3. Re:"The best weapon is a sharp mind" by Mr.+Samuel · · Score: 1

      The Jack Thompson is impervious to conventional human weaponry. His control over magnetic fields and superhuman strength mean that we only have one remaining option: Installing Windows on him.

  26. Forget the Games.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I say hang'em, and make it public while at it.
    There's no excuse for such a thing, especially after the man let them stay on his property.

    Read more here about the actual murder:
    http://www.wafb.com/Global/story.asp?S=4972800

  27. Hitman, gamer.... by spentrent · · Score: 1

    ...or pornstar. BADABING.

  28. Jack Thompson is a useless twit. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These people really need some perspective. Let's say games contribute to a few murders every year. Of all the murders committed in the US in a year, what percentage of those were motivated by games assuming there's even a clear link? I'd venture to say it isn't even as high as 1%.

    But we have this stupid jerk who's gone on a personal crusade against games. He'd better serve the public by going after crime in general. But I guess that wouldn't grab the headlines quite like his vendetta against games.

    As for the police seizing games for evidence, I think thats perfectly reasonable. I expect the police to leave no stone unturned in any murder investigation.

    1. Re:Jack Thompson is a useless twit. by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that if we (as gamers and other computer users) ignore him, he'll manage to convince people that he is right and we won't be there to provide the counterbalance.

      We can't afford to ignore him, but we CAN afford to make as much fun of him as possible and make sure EVERYONE knows just exactly how preposterous everything he says is. This means everything from simple 'gamers have a tendency to copy their games' to 'gamers are evil, disgusting creatures that would as soon shoot you in the face as look at you' and everything in-between. His tamest-sounding speech is poison to the minds of anyone involved with law. Every single thing that he gets someone to believe is a blow to the freedom of gamers around the USA. (Luckily, he hasn't spread world-wide yet.)

      We cannot afford to be lax because the only 'experts' in this field are us. If we ignore him, he gets to run rampant.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Jack Thompson is a useless twit. by lspd · · Score: 1

      We cannot afford to be lax because the only 'experts' in this field are us.

      Neither gamers nor lawyers are experts on the psychological effects of prolonged exposure to simulated violence.

    3. Re:Jack Thompson is a useless twit. by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      We can't afford to ignore him,


      While that is true a couple of years ago, this is no longer the case.

      Right after attacking Penny Arcade, the NIMF decided that the lawyer was a liability and asked him to stop using the NIMF name. His retalation was to call the NIMF friendly towards violent video games, which simply proved the point of the NIMF. He also tried to sue the Florida Bar Association because they were investigating him - the case is now dropped but not before making him look uncredible.

      Jack Thompson stands alone. He has no long-term political allies, and most of his recommended bills would get nailed by applette level courts anyway. His primary writings are substandard when used as a means to gain support.

      but we CAN afford to make as much fun of him as possible and make sure EVERYONE knows just exactly how preposterous everything he says is.


      We could do that - but it is ultimatly ineffective on sites such as Slashdot (aside from a short-lived emotional pleasure.) See below:

      We cannot afford to be lax because the only 'experts' in this field are us. If we ignore him, he gets to run rampant.


      The experts in the field are known as Criminologists. With this knowledge, you have the ammunition you need to successfully discredit him.

      Most newspapers quote the Miami-based lawyer as if he was an expert in Criminology (i.e. by quoting him on the statement where only video gamers/hitman shoot in the head), unless they are providing a form of negative spin to prevent them from appearing as unbalanced. In general, you write a letter to the editor in reply to one of their articles - stating that the article was missing information from a criminology expert (who states that head shots are standard in domestic crimes that have no relation to games). Once you make that statement, you begin undermining his clout - you can use any other appropriate means to further discredit him. In this case, refer to his previous campaign to link video games to Jacob Robida. Finally, provide a better alternative to the original statements, such as providing info about the NIMF or related organizations.

      On the Gamepolitics website, the ridiculing only caused the forum to be flooded. When dealing with him in the mainstream media, you want to have quality arguments, not quantity.
    4. Re:Jack Thompson is a useless twit. by incabulos · · Score: 1

      I estimate that approx 100% of felons have consumed a dangerous pharmaceutical chemical known as Dihydrogen Monoxide shortly before committing crimes. Indeed, this lethal poison is widespread, able to be purhased at many stores without ID, even commonly sold to minors! It contaminates lakes and high concentrations can even be found in the breast milk of mothers who go on to pass the deadly substance onto their newborns.

      This evil must be stopped!

      http://www.dhmo.org/

  29. Why not both? by Admiral+Frosty · · Score: 2

    I always equate "Hitman" with "gamer" anyways, prefering stealth-based games myself...

    I really need to get out more...

  30. Feeding the troll by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    I really wish we could all ignore Jack Thompson and his misplaced histrionics.

    I wish he had half the dignity of Al Sharpton, who some would say was for a long time a 'racism' troll as much as JT is a 'videogame' troll. Both hop on sensationalist events to push their agenda, pandering to the people who think like them, while ignoring tangential issues, and in many cases, the truth.

    I'm not trying to be flamebait here -- my point is that many of the people who listen to/respect Jack Thompson dislike Al Sharpton because of the 'attention-whoring' he has done in the past -- yet Jack is another facet of the same polyhedron.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  31. How come... by nsmike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How come every time I see a picture of Jack Thompson it looks like he's pinching a rather large and stubborn loaf?

    In all seriousness, I'd like to see just how many "video gamers" were convicted of shooting someone in the face.

    I'd also like to see how many people have been shot in the face prior to violent video games. Throw in how many violent crimes were committed in the US since the advent of violent video games vs. prior to violent video games. Add to that the average yearly income of the person responsible for a violent crime who is not a dependent, and see if they could even afford video games. Add to that a demographic study of who plays video games vs. a demographic study of who commits violent crimes. And one more thing... Take the demographic of video gamers and see how many people in that demographic have actually committed violent crimes.

    I'd be very interested to see the results of THAT study. I imagine Mr. Thompson, however, would not.

  32. Logic 101 by Anti_Climax · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman or a videogamer."
    Ok Class, I'd like you to open your Logical Arguments texts to the chapter of fallacies and begin reading from the heading False Choice
    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    1. Re:Logic 101 by strider44 · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of a joke:
      John met a man at a party and during the conversation he asked what he does for a living. The man replied "I'm a logician."

      "What's that?" asked John.

      "Well, here's an example. Do you have a lawnmower?"

      "Yes"

      "From this, I deduce that you have a house."

      "Yes, I do."

      "OK, from this I deduce that you therefore have a wife and kids?"

      "I have."

      "Therefore I deduce that you must be heterosexual."

      "Wow, that's amazing!"

      When John got home he told his neighbour about meeting the logician at the party.

      "Let me give you an example" he said. "Do you have a lawnmower?" The neighbour responded no.

      "Pfft. Faggot" replied John.
    2. Re:Logic 101 by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Or, to put it another way, "I'm a videogamer hitman, you insensitive clod!"

  33. Does this count? by Klowner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What about the backside of the head. Does that count too?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln

    Someone care to edit that wiki page to include Booth's suggested "mad 1337 GTA sk!llzs"?

  34. Shot in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries."

    Those google hits were probably all porn sites. You know ... shot in the face ...

    I hope I don't need to be more specific.

  35. You make a valid point by Mr.+Samuel · · Score: 1

    Well said, sir. Honestly, Jack Thompson's claims would fail under even the smallest amount of scientific or rational scrutiny in my mind, and I guess I'm overly hopeful that our legal systems would see things the same way. But then, since when have we been able to rely on the masses?

    1. Re:You make a valid point by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I think you're a little misled if you think it's our legal system :)

      It's rapidly being bought and paid for, either with vote pandering or with coldhardcas^Wcampaign contributions.

      Depending on the masses is fine, as long as they/we are educated about the issue(s). My problem is when asshats like JT abuse the scapegoating nature of people.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  36. ehh? by jtalerico · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman or a videogamer." Nobody masturbates unless they are bored or a videogamer. Nobody bathes unless they are dirty or a videogamer. etc.. Forget the terrorists, I am worried about all the videogamers out there!

    1. Re:ehh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nobody bathes unless they are dirty or a videogamer.
      Videogamers bathe?!
    2. Re:ehh? by jtalerico · · Score: 1

      If you consider the jolt cola rolling down their chin a "bath" then maybe.

    3. Re:ehh? by Admiral+Justin · · Score: 1

      "Nobody bathes unless they are dirty or a videogamer. etc"

      But doesn't that rule us out as the great unwashed masses?

      --
      You will be baked, and there will be cake.
    4. Re:ehh? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      "Forget the terrorists, I am worried about all the videogamers out there!"

      What about the videogaming terrorists? Didn't I read somewhere that they used Microsoft's Flight Simulator for planning purposes?

  37. shot in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries."

    A quick search for '"shot in the face" game' turns up 500,000 entries.

  38. Hmmm.. the Mozambique drill. Not from gamers. by Rifter13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Mozambique Drill is a 2+1 drill, where you fire 2 to center mass and 1 to the head. It is designed to stop those people hopped up on adrenalin or drugs. You generally fire "into the face" for this drill. Jack is really out there. He is becomming more shrill and pathetic as time goes on.

  39. Actually, those Google stats... by Skevin · · Score: 1

    > "Jews did 911" turns up almost 900,000 easily ...may be more meaningful than you think. Everytime I see a car accident in downtown L.A. involving someone Jewish*, the first thing that happens is someone dials 911 regardless of how minor the damage is.

    *Okay, this also happens with any other ethnic/racial group, but I just wanted to make my point.

    Solomon Chang

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
  40. Trends by giminy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Google trends shows that there is no correlation between video games and being shot in the face. I rest my case.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:Trends by dmatos · · Score: 1

      However, there does seem to be some correlation between the movie "Toy Story" and being shot in the face. Hmm...

      (BTW - neat page!)

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    2. Re:Trends by MirrororriM · · Score: 1

      However, google trends *does* show a direct correlation between your mom and my face. I rest *my* case. ;D

      --
      Content Management System: A pretentious way of saying "text editor."
  41. How to get Mr Media Whore's panties in a bunch by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Release a mode for the Windows Solitaire game so the cards feature sado-masochistic gay porn. Perhaps if the asshole runs with it, Vista will be rated NC17.

  42. Numbers don't lie... by singingjim · · Score: 1

    Obviously 921,000 gamers with (blood turned on) FPS addictions. It's simple math people. Maybe Jack is onto something. BLAM!! [my head asplode]

    --
    Terrible karma and aiming lower, which in this environment of one-sided reason, is higher.
  43. Dick Cheney plays GTA? by guysmilee · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dick Cheney plays GTA?

  44. Not in the Face Not In the Face! by SirStanley · · Score: 1

    "Not in the Face Not In the Face" --Arthur

    "SPOON!" -- The Tick

    --
    --------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
    1. Re:Not in the Face Not In the Face! by Overfiend1976 · · Score: 1

      "BOOM! HEADSHOT!!" - FPS Doug

      --
      This sig will self destruct in 5 seconds.
  45. Elmer Fudd by AVryhof · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure, I have seen Elmer Fudd, Daffy Duck, and a number of other popular cartoon characters get shot in the face plenty of times. Does this mean the murderer watches Loony Tunes?

    1. Re:Elmer Fudd by meridiangod · · Score: 1

      Sadly enough, some people would answer 'yes' to that question.

  46. Overhearing the CSU.... by cttforsale · · Score: 1

    "got it" "got it" "need it"....

  47. more logic by matt328 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman or a videogamer."

    And no one utters anything that fucking stupid unless they're pushing an agenda, or a lawyer, or both.

    --
    Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
    1. Re:more logic by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      And no one utters anything that fucking stupid unless they're pushing an agenda, or a lawyer, or both.


      Real lawyers don't even come close to saying that - I can tell because the original quote comes off as if it were written by someone who has trouble expressing himself.

      Ambulance-chasing lawyers, on the other hand, would meet the requirements.

    2. Re:more logic by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      And no one utters anything that fucking stupid unless they're pushing an agenda, or a lawyer, or both.

      I would think pushing lawyers would be illegal. Based on the performance of various corporations they seem to be a harmfully addictive substance with definite negative ramifications.

    3. Re:more logic by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      your english parser needs patching.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  48. Alien Conspiracy by ajpr · · Score: 1

    http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=shot%20in%20th e%20face

    For infallable evidence of the conspiracy see the first result.

  49. "shot in the face" -"video game" -hitman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google give me this:
    496,000 for "shot in the face" -"video game" -hitman

  50. Face-shooting aside... by Hervard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jack Thompson shoots himself in the foot all the time.

    1. Re:Face-shooting aside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, face shoots YOU!

    2. Re:Face-shooting aside... by Deathbane27 · · Score: 1

      Nobody categorizes an action as belonging to only two groups of people unless you're a fuckwit or making satire.

      --
      If it ain't broke, it needs more features!
    3. Re:Face-shooting aside... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      How can he shoot it? It is allways wedged firmly is his mouth!

  51. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...stop paying attention to Thompson. Please? That's the best way to make him go away...

  52. Hitmen don't shoot in the face by Itsacon · · Score: 1

    Actually, everyone who's ever played a game from the 'Hitman' series, knows that shooting a target in the face isn't very practical. Knife or piano wire from behind is much less messy, and less likely to bring any bodyguard to your victims aid...

    --
    I take life with a grain of salt...a slice of lemon and a dash of tequila
  53. JT is right by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

    As a young impressionable child I played a lot of Pac-man. It was a "gateway" game, I'm afraid. Soon I was hooked on Mrs. Pacman, then Dig-dug and even pitfall. Now every time I see an 8-bit pixelated character I have this insane urge to kill. STOP THE MADNESS! Video Games make children worship satan, become homosexuals and then join the Taliban. If you plug in the xbox 360, then the terrorists win!

    1. Re:JT is right by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      I personally can't see a white circle without dividing my torso and shoving it directly into my stomach. I'm also suspiciously fond of cherries and pretzels.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  54. it must be true by jaimz22 · · Score: 1

    hey, it must be true, because i play of games, and i ALWAY shoot my victims in the face.

    also could this be related to porn instead of games? I always hear about porn and "facial shots"

  55. Google News Search by gizmo_mathboy · · Score: 1

    While a web search on Google turns up a lot of hits, a Google News search is much more focused and probably relevant.

    "gunshot to the face"

    This turns up 5 hits from May 5 to May 29th. Four of them in the US and one in South Africa. Not one seems to mention a hitman or a gamer.

  56. Real Hitmen... by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

    ...don't use guns. At least not according to the latest BBC review http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5040188.stm/ . Apparently, dropping chandeliers on the mark is a more artistic way of achieving the perfect kill.

  57. Crab Battle by cyko500 · · Score: 0

    crab..... battle.... Just watch it.

  58. OT: the paragraph tag by geobeck · · Score: 2, Informative

    The [p] tag works normally if you close the previous paragraph with a [/p] (which has been the preferred way to close a paragraph for several years, although unclosed paragraphs still work for the most part.

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  59. What about . . . by __michikal · · Score: 0

    . . . a gamer who plays Hitman?

  60. "s i t f" has multiple potential meanings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries."

    ok but it could relate to photography, porn, movies or games. could relate to other things too.

    that means there's no finger pointing just off the number of google hits for that string tag.

  61. Cheney is a GAMER? by fishbowl · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Is Dick Cheney a Gamer or a Hitman?

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Cheney is a GAMER? by darkhadden · · Score: 0

      Guns don't kill people, vice presidents kill people. Maybe if he'd picked up a video game he wouldn't have screwed up a shot to the face with a shotgun. Seriously, how do you fail???

      --
      All the world's a stage, all the people but players.
  62. Re:Cue the Dick Cheney jokes - but seriously by Buran · · Score: 1

    a. you watch way too much CSI: Miami (yes, I loved that the young woman was the winner);

    Haven't seen that one. Tell me about it?

  63. I was threatened with this by a Police officer by stibrian · · Score: 1

    Long story short - it is in the police report
    "if you move, I'll shoot you in the face".

    This from a fine boy in blue in the state of Colorado in 1995.

    Guess he was a gamer back then....

    1. Re:I was threatened with this by a Police officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, only the police can be trusted to have guns. Threatening "civilians" with imminent death takes years of training to do safely.

    2. Re:I was threatened with this by a Police officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a dimwit loser, so what does one have to do to get a police officer to say such a thing to you? Please share.

  64. COD2 by RxScram · · Score: 1

    I have noticed that Call of Duty 2 has different damages for some helmet shots vs unprotected head shots. It's pretty funny shooting the helmet off of an enemy and watching the expression on his face as his hands shoot up to where his helmet just was... very nicely done!

  65. It must be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evidence www.purepwnage.com
    "BOOM Headshot, YEAH"

  66. Um by SoulRider · · Score: 1

    "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman or a videogamer."

    So then what does that make this person?

  67. 921,000 hits? Holy crap. by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 5, Funny

    The better question is: How did the murderer lug around 921,000 rounds of ammuniition without being noticed?

    1. Re:921,000 hits? Holy crap. by GhaleonStrife · · Score: 1

      And how did he hit with them all?! He must have twinked his accuracy stat. What's he got, +5 gloves of shooting in the face?

    2. Re:921,000 hits? Holy crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was hacking.

    3. Re:921,000 hits? Holy crap. by mabufo · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why a google search for 'shot in the face' holds any relevancy whatsoever to this situation.

      --
      Serenity now!
  68. The Rest of the Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the articles fail to mention that the 55 year old man plays Counter-Strike. The 16 year old kid caught him wallhacking and gave him what he deserved.

  69. Re:Cue the Dick Cheney jokes - but seriously by e4g4 · · Score: 1
    If you just wanted to demonstrate that they were disturbed, all you have to do is show that they owned a copy of DOA: extreme beach volyball.
    Hmm, I beg to differ - all that would demonstrate would be a predilection for CGI animated, bouncing breasts...

    ...OTOH, you could construe that as being disturbed...
    --
    The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
  70. Re:the CSI Miami connection by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a. you watch way too much CSI: Miami (yes, I loved that the young woman was the winner);

    Haven't seen that one. Tell me about it?

    oh, there was a game development firm that had a "live" contest with their new game, where Univ Miami students competed to rack up points by playing the game "live" and robbing banks, shooting people, etc, all while wearing hockey masks spraypainted. Turned out the winner was a young woman, one of the player helpers died while playing online for 72 hours straight, and the game firm was supplying full auto weapons and armor-piercing bullets.

    This is why much of America thinks that gamers are murderers, IMHO. It's a very popular show.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  71. SWAT snipers apparently do it by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    I saw part of a show on the discovery channel about SWAT teams, and the sniper on the team was talking about how his target is the triangle made from the temples and the bottom of the nose.

    They also showed him shoot a practice target as his team broke down a door and headed into the room; with his bullet traveling within a foot of his team members on its way to the target.
  72. Headshots... by Linuxbeak · · Score: 1

    Gee, I suppose that all snipers count as hitmen or gamers. Policeman must be hitmen or gamers.... ooh! Terrorists/insurgents who execute people at point-blank range, they must be hitmen or gamers, too!

  73. TV? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    Did they take his TV, too? What about violent R-rated movies? What about books that describe murder in detail (Tom Clancy is a bit guilty of this)?

    I'm trying to figure out if this is Louisiana stupidity or if they're just absorbing some of it from Florida.

    By the way, Jack Thompson should die in a fi-*BLAM* AH I DIDN'T MEAN IT DON'T TAKE ME TO J@)&%)#&*%SIGNAL INTERRUPTED

  74. ENGLISH MUFFINS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being that I just woke up, and the 'I' key is right next to the 'O' key, I accidently googled "Shit in the face."

    It seems that twice as many people get shot in the face than poo'ed in the face.

  75. Re:the CSI Miami connection by Buran · · Score: 1

    I do watch all three shows but joined kind of late (I saw an episode some years ago that tapped into a passing interest of mine and they used every buzzword in sight, and did it badly, so for a long time I refused to give the show a try. Bad choice on their part and to this day I refuse to watch that epsidoe again -- which show and episode will remain nameless). So I missed that one.

    That sounds similar to a NY episode I saw but not quite ... anyway, I have noticed that CSI does do that. They'll take case ideas from real life, and often distort things in the process, and get it all wrong (like what happened to me). And this gives the clueless public a bad image of what for those of us who partake in the interest in question (in this case gaming), so the public doesn't bother to find the truth but assumes that if it's on TV it must be true.

    CSI overall is a good show but I'd like to see them try harder to be truthful about what they portray. (And that's not even counting the magic photo-manip software that can get a HD-quality image out of a VGA-resolution security camera).

  76. Ack! by schon · · Score: 1

    s/horizontal/vertical/

  77. He's right by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I've been playing way too much Oblivion, and I've already cast various Destruction spells on three people who annoyed me at work today. Well, I waved my hand and they looked at me funny when nothing happened, but you get my point... or you would if I had one. Anyway, I have to go turn my lunch into an invisibility potion so no one gives me anything to do this afternoon.

  78. Head Shot!! by Lord51N15T3R · · Score: 2, Funny

    So they got a Head Shot!! but did they get a Godlike!! ??

  79. MOD PARENT DOWN PEDOPHILE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linuxbeak is an admin on Wikipedia, or more aptly known as Wikipedophila, the encyclopedia that harbors, supports, and helps pedophiles because to take a stance on the abuse of our children by perverts would make Wikipedia "POV" and biased.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN PEDOPHILE by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia... the encyclopedia that harbors, supports, and helps pedophiles because to take a stance on the abuse of our children by perverts would make Wikipedia "POV" and biased.

      Wow. That kind of logic is unmistakable.

      Couldn't resist opening your trap while we mock you, could you, Jackie?

  80. What if you're BOTH?! by aurifex · · Score: 0

    But what if you're both a hitman and a videogamer? Oh my! PANDORA'S BOX!!!

  81. Minor correction necessary: by one-eye-johnson · · Score: 1
    "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman, videogamer, or pornstar." GP goes on to point out the lunacy of this claim. From the site: "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries, the vast majority of which turn out to be action shots of bukkake."
  82. Classic Misdirection by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries."

    Quick seize Google.

    No, wait, seize the Internet.

    No, wait, seize this.

  83. Re:Or dick Cheney .... by Braino420 · · Score: 1

    You have officially killed the joke.

    --
    They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
  84. Game store clerk shot in chest by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Interesting that a game store got robbed and the clerk was shot in chest: http://www.click2houston.com/news/9275077/detail.h tml

  85. Exit Wounds by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

    It would be my assumption that shooting the person thru the back of the head with a large enough weapon to fully penetrate and exit the head, would do the most damage to their face.

    A bullet entry wound is normally very small and round. On many types of animals the entry wound can be hard to find (hair) and many times it bleeds very little. I've known a few Dallas paramedics, they've told me that finding entry wounds can be difficult some of the time.

    The exit wound from a full penetration high velocity round is a different story. Hollow point or high expansion rounds many times will double or tripple there surface area, and many times fragment providing multiple wound channels. It is a mess. Bone fragments, large tears and lacerations, and this bloody goo that is sort of, but not entirely quite like jello.

  86. Hitman or Gamer by PantherDX · · Score: 2, Funny

    And its pretty easy to tell the two apart, as only one of them screams out HEADSHOT!!! after performing the deed.

    1. Re:Hitman or Gamer by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the biggest laugh I've had in a while.

  87. Shot in the Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries."

    Sorry, porn site results aren't relavent here... :p

  88. Bender Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha. I checked the headers for this article/page and the X-Bender returned the Bender quote "This guy's not making any sense. Can I kill him? Please?"

    That's priceless!

    --

    About the article, Jack Thompson is a fuck up. ONLY IN AMERICA.

  89. Counterexample by Tairnyn · · Score: 1

    Amy Fisher was neither a gamer nor a hitman.

    --
    "Don't waste your time or time will waste you" -MUSE
  90. Firewalled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn it, Zonk, some of us are at work. You could have linked to or some other version.

    When you're running a story that's not really about games (this one's about moron lawyers and moron cops), PLEASE try to link to

    a) a site that won't likely be firewalled and

    b) a site that won't be slashdotted.

    If you must link one of these types of sites, at least link the coral cache!

    (PS- the new design is CRAP. Please change it bacK!)

  91. One leads to the other by ianscot · · Score: 1

    His actual motivations for his war on video games probably go no further than a quest for power and publicity. Unless, of course, he's actually out of touch with reality to the extent of believing what he says.

    Once one starts down the path of questing for power and publicity, it's easy to lose track of the truth and start believing whatever reinforces your position.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  92. "turns up 921,000 entries." by seamusfp · · Score: 1

    How many are about the Vice President?

  93. Surely .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most of those 921,000 (say about 920,999) entires are pr0n related?

  94. This makes Dick Cheney what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, he did shot someone in the face :-)

  95. Here's a good question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many hits for "shot in the face" WEREN'T porn sites?

  96. I knew it was bullshit. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    When I read the three words "Jack Thompson said". That guy is a complete looney toon. He's been disbarred how many times? He's headed how many cults? I'm shocked and awed by the sheer fact that he can still practice law *anywhere*.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  97. fbi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do recall that Lon Horiuchi shot Vicki Weaver in the face... oh, perhaps that just means that Lon Horiuchi was a fbi hitman.

  98. In puritanical America... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...sin commits you!

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
    1. Re:In puritanical America... by Meph_the_Balrog · · Score: 1

      Its dificult to tell if you intended this as funny or not, but IMHO (and no offense to any Americanites on slashdot) but this is what you get when you have a country based largely on a puritan belief structure ends up with controlling interest in the worlds largest information tool.

      I think Robin Williams said it best; "How anal do you have to be for the English to go: "Get the fuck out!""

  99. Damn! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    I've got a copy of Doom3 at home, so if any demons escaped from hell turn up dead... that makes me a prime suspect!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  100. Dick Cheney? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hitman or a videogamer

    I can't quite figure out in which category Dick Cheney fits.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  101. If there was a shred... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many video gamers are there in the US? If people who play video games were violent, Jack Thompson would have been dead a long, long time ago.

    Too bad he's full of shit, I'd like to piss on his grave.

  102. Unsolved murder by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    There was an unsolved murder in my home town, I believe shortly before I was born. The local part-time deputy contaminated the crime scene when he moved the shotgun that was used to blow the victim's face into little bits of hamburger. While this may be somewhat commonplace in larger communities it's not in a rural community under 250 people. So no, Jack, I'd say that things like this happen without the involvement of violent video games. That is unless of course Pong and Mrs. Pacman drove the killer to do it. There wasn't much else available at the time. The Atari 2600 wasn't even out yet.

  103. hmm... by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

    "Funny, that. A quick Google search on 'shot in the face' turns up 921,000 entries."

    How many of those links were pointing to murders and not porn sites??

  104. T-Shirt For Sale Possibly! by LaptopZZ · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    I might make a shirt out of this if there is enough interest.

    http://pixabug.com/tshirt.html

    ~ZZ

    --
    -=LaptopZZ=-
  105. If there's one thing I've learned over the years.. by rthille · · Score: 1

    from watching movies.

    If you want to not be bothered by someone and you have the time and opportunity, _ALWAYS_ double tap them to the head!

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  106. And the games are...? by Dormann · · Score: 1

    I know JT referenced "Grand Theft Auto", but has there been a definitive list of the specific games confiscated? Every aricle I've read mentions "several".

  107. What if you're just by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    practicing your mozambique drills?

  108. You don't know, Jack by mmalove · · Score: 1

    When you have no data to back your claims, just ask google. Or in this case, googlefight:

    http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&wo rd1=Driving+Game&word2=Shooting+Game
    http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&wo rd1=Shooting+Death&word2=Driving+Death

    Clearly, the increased number of driving games has caused an increased number of driving deaths. Ban Grand Turismo Now!!

    [/sarcasm]

    --
    You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  109. google counts... by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    google counts mean shit, I hate that.

    That many hits on shot in the face... well, that's far too many to be related to, hold on,

    I just googled "video game" and got 637,000,000 hits.

    So it is possible after all?

    Plus, we've just proved tea.

    well done us.

    --

    -pyrrho

  110. videogame making contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't Jack, the same guy that proposed a videogame making challenge? I think the object of the game was to kill programmers in RockStar Games(makers of Grandtheft Auto), and various other companies that have been on his 'hitlist.'

    If I remember correctly, he was offering a lump sum of money, and someone did make a game on his challenge. I don't think I remember him doing anything with the money, even though the person did say they wouldn't profit off it, but donate all money to a charity.

  111. Why is it... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Why do I feel more inclined to act violently when I read about that asshat Jack Thompson than I do after playing Raven Shield for a few hours?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  112. The politicians' mistake by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

    Also the bad stastician's mistake - confusing correlation with causality. Or perhaps in this case, casualty.

    To demonstrate, here's a little anecdote:
    It has been proven time and time again that there's a strong correlation between ice-cream sales and drowning deaths. In response, some local politicans suggested curbing ice-cream sales; they assumed that since there was a correlation, ice cream must somehow be responsible for these drowning deaths. The reality, of course, was much less sinister. Ice cream sales go up in the summer, and so do the number of people swimming (and thus, sinking).

    This is the same thing, but with games; when someone gets shot "in the face," and when the murderer has violent video games, everyone assumes that there must be some sort of relation. In reality, more and more people are OWNING videogames, so there's a good chance that these people are just going to have them anyway. In my mind, all these politicans are jumping to pseudo-scientific conclusions. They haven't proven correlation, and they can't prove causality without first proving correlation.

    I think what they should be asking is "How many people are playing video games that AREN'T murderers?" I know I'm not a murderer, and I enjoy my GTA.

    I know that having the right to own games like this, or even play them with impunity, may not be the mainstream definition of "liberty," but we're basically having restrictions recommended on our media regardless of the actual reality; I believe Frankling said it best: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:The politicians' mistake by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I think you're giving them too much credit. They aren't confusing correlation and causality. As you pointed out, they don't even have any correlation to confuse. All they have is a collection of anecdotes, and weak ones at that. This guy shot someone and he happened to own video games.

      Someone else pointed out a study that made the mistake of not correcting for relative population sizes. That's not indicating a correlation either, because you've failed to meet the basic conditions for the test you're applying.

    2. Re:The politicians' mistake by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1

      Another one that show correlation doesn't prove causation is that we need more pirates to stop global warming. From FSM.
      From that graph you can see DRM is causing global warming.

  113. History? by stalebread · · Score: 1

    People have been shot in the face, clubbed over the head, and stabbed since the beginning of the human race. Hell, the Holocaust, in which millions of people were dragged out of their homes to be murdered in cold blood, predates Pong by at least 20 years. I think anyone who blames video games for violence needs to take a look at history.

  114. The Google Fallacy by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    Putting something into Google and getting results implies that your argument is correct.

  115. Very Biased by WizADSL · · Score: 1

    Ok, M rated games. How many R-Rated DVDs and or VHS tapes? How much TV-MA rated television viewing? What ever happened to blaming everything on rock/rap music? Maybe it's another RIAA plot!

  116. Correlation does not imply causation by stalebread · · Score: 1

    Using corralatory evidence can be used to ban anything. Let's choose Colgate toothpaste for example. Let's say that investigators found that 1 out of 10 murderers use Colgate toothpaste. Does that mean that the toothpaste made these people commit murders? Obviously not. This is one of the first things they teach in courses on logic: Correlation does not imply causation. Unfortunately, not everyone's taken courses on logic. If you replace toothpaste with video games, the general public may be convinced.

  117. Re: Wacko Jacko by Dudukain · · Score: 1

    Urg, Jack Thompson is merely the current incarnation of the lady who started BADD or Jack Chick. Their nuts, and they go on a vendetta against people who are obviously smarter than them (I.E. Everyone). I find Jack Thompson to be a vile excuse for a human being. Speaking of which, does anyone know if 9 foot long leeches are a cure for insanity? If so, I recommend Jack Thompson's psychiatrist (And I pity him) prescribe them.

  118. Shot in the face? by X3J11 · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows a real gamer would never use something so pedestrian as a gun. Rocket launcher's the only way to go, and if the shooter has any style, he'd be rocket jumping off the guy's head to get to the quad.

  119. Food for Thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Google search for:

    "shot in the face"

    returns 879,000. A search for:

    "shot in the face" -gamer

    returns 921,000. A search for:

    "shot in the face" -hitman

    returns 649,000. A search for:

    "shot in the face" -jesus

    returns 788,000.

    Draw your own conclusions.

  120. Crime Rate? (statistics) by nschubach · · Score: 0

    I suppose some facts were overlooked in deciding the cause of his violence.
    "Neher, whose mother has a mobile home parked on Gore's property, and Hunter Everette, 17, of Denham Springs, were booked with first-degree murder and armed robbery on Wednesday."

    "The estimated population, in 2003, was 9,204."
    "The number of violent crimes recorded by the FBI in 2003 was 174."
    "The violent crime rate was 19 per 1,000 people."

    Must be alot of gamers there!

    Reference

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  121. AO, not M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A game about killing police, stealing cars, and shooting pedestrians with shotguns should definately give a game an M rating, and GTA: San Andreas did received that very rating from day one of its release.

    The hidden intimacy scenes - which, although technically present in the data files, were in no way accessible without unauthorized 3rd-party modifications - that were brought to light after the game's release are what got the game re-rated as AO (Adults Only).

  122. Poor taste alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    millions of people were dragged out of their homes to be murdered in cold blood

    Yeah, but were they shot in the face?

  123. Who cares about that piece of garbage? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone see the way he was acting towards those folks on GameFAQs when that kid committed suicide? He's nothing but human waste. In any other context, the right thinking individuals of the world would have lynched him for his disgusting behaviour, but he can hide behind a courtroom and an internet connection.

    He's not even worthy of spitting on.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  124. Uh... Angola, people. by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1
    West Feliciana Parish, where this crime took place, is home of the infamous Angola prison. The parish has a lot of prisoners families, and in addition, its probably the most boring place in Louisiana (except when they hold the annual prison rodeo). So to me this suggests one of two things:

    1. The kid is prone to violence from coming from a bad family or...
    2. He's REALLY FREAKIN' BORED and got in trouble because of that boredom. Its a proven fact that BOREDOM leads to trouble, not video games.

  125. oddly Google by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

    "Results 1 - 10 of about 28 for "shoot in face". (0.08 seconds) "

  126. Games don't kill peope, GOD kills people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could make more of case stating people who worship religions are far more dangerous than video game players. Department of Psychology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Of the men who reported a religious experience, attended church weekly, and displayed elevated complex partial epileptic like signs (5.7% of all males), 44% stated they would kill another person if God told them to do so. And apparently god tells people often because there are TONS of cases of people killing in the name of god, or because god apparently told them it was a good idea. How many game players would go kill if the games even blatantly told them to do so??? Ban religion, not video games games!

  127. Clearly Jack thinks Penny Arcade is fact... by riprjak · · Score: 1

    ...because THIS could be the source of his face shooting obsession :)

    Although the specific reference is to mouth shooting!!

    Just a thought :)
    err!
    jak.

  128. Ignorance to the ignorant by imutau · · Score: 1

    This person is just a publicity hog. Ignoring him would be the meanest thing you could do to him.

  129. Wrong era for that, bub by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    See, in the dark ages if you were born a psychopath and not of noble blood, the most you could look forward to was becoming a brigand or a serial killer and eventually swinging from the gallows. Not that exciting a prospect for either the psychopath or the victims. You can see why it was called the dark ages.

    Nowadays, however, we live in more civilized times. Psychopaths can go for example into politics (what Jack is doing _is_ politics) or management, and keep themselves entertained for a lifetime trying to screw each other over in courtrooms, board meetings, media debates, or whatever else is apropriate. In some cases that even creates value for the rest of the society, e.g., for shareholders. E.g., firing the whole R&D department and setting the company on a 5 year course to bankruptcy invariably makes the share price rise. Investors love "cost saving measures", or at least have been conditioned like Pavlov's dog that that's when they must reach for the wallet.

    What I'm getting at is that Jack is a psychopath. It doesn't mean "axe murderer" (or not necessarily), it just means a complete lack of empathy for others. Their care for others is really about the same as most people feel for an NPC: the other people are just there as unimportant playthings, nothing more. They can cheat them, manipulate them, even kill them if they can get away with it, whatever keeps them entertained. And they're damn good at manipulating and rationalizing anything that serves their purposes. (E.g., the most surrealistic I've read was one rationalizing that raping a child is a victimless crime and shouldn't be punished. _That_ kind of being able to rationalize _anything_.)

    Same deal: they won't feel any kind of "oh man, I'm such an asshole for manipulating this nice guy into ruining his own life" reaction. So he can say anything with a straight face. Or whatever kind of a face is needed.

    So, as I've saying, Jack is a psychopath. He'll do anything that fits his goals, including lie, cheat and manipulate people's fears. There are no two ways about it. Anyone who sees manipulating the fear of a mother that her kid might be on the next Columbine-style casualty list, as just means to build a political carreer or to get attention on TV, has got to be a psychopath.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  130. Standard technique by Muchsake · · Score: 1

    A double tab headshot is the textbook technique for all special forces and high skill police firearms units where and immediate kill is needed. As mentioned in other posts hitmen prefer to kill from behind so that the victim doesn't get a chance to react and maybe get a shot off at the hitman.

  131. faulty logic by LKM · · Score: 1

    Playing violent games lowers your inhibition of shooting somebody in the face != playing violent games turns you into a murderer.

    Your example tells me absolutely nothing about the truth in Thompson's claims.

  132. Hit men don't ... by NoSalt · · Score: 1



    Hit men don't shoot people in the face ... they shoot them in the back of the head.

  133. PBS by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
    I remember when PBS was running John LeCarre's Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy years ago. Whenever they would run the preview for the show, one of the characters (I think played by Alec Guiness) would say, "He was shot... in the face... at extremely close range."

    I saw it so often the phrase got stuck in my head.

    They call PBS educational television for a reason, you know!

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    1. Re:PBS by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      Actually, that might have been a sequel, Smiley's People now that I think about it.

      I'm getting old...

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."