Slashdot Mirror


How Not to Steal a Sidekick

timmit was one of many readers to point out the story of a stolen Sidekick, writing with this excerpt from the site: ""When my friend realized that she had left the Sidekick in the taxi she asked me to immediately send a message to the phone saying that we would give a reward for the phone. There was no response. After a day of waiting, she had to go to the store and spend over $300 on a new Sidekick. When she put her SIM card in, she saw that the person(s) that had taken the phone had not only signed on to AOL leaving their name and password in the phone, but they had taken pictures of themselves." I can sympathize, after someone with the address Rmluckyguy@aol.com tried to sell me back the Visor Deluxe stolen from my car last year in Philadelphia. I hope Evan has better luck.

424 comments

  1. Slashdotted already by bernywork · · Score: 0

    Did a subscriber get a look at the page?

    --
    Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    1. Re:Slashdotted already by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did a subscriber get a look at the page [before it disappeared]?

      That website was running on the stolen Sidekick, you insensitive clod!

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Slashdotted already by devilspgd · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's still up now... *blink*

      --
      http://www.evanwashere.com/StolenSidekick/

      June 6th, 2006: The people in the pictures below have my friend's T-Mobile Sidekick. Instead of doing the honorable thing when finding someone's phone in a taxi, they instead kept it.

      I have found 8 cell phones in the last couple years in taxis. EVERY single one I have contacted the owner (by leaving a message on their voice mail or by answering their phone and telling their friends that I have the phone) and returned it promptly. When people have found my phone, they have also in turn returned it.

      When my friend realized that she had left the Sidekick in the taxi she asked me to immediately send a message to the phone saying that we would give a reward for the phone. There was no response. After a day of waiting, she had to go to the store and spend over $300 on a new Sidekick. When she put her SIM card in, she saw that the person(s) that had taken the phone had not only signed on to AOL leaving their name and password in the phone, but they had taken pictures of themselves.

      I immediately contacted the AOL name: Sashacristal8905 and requested that the Sidekick be returned. I was immediately told that my "white ass" didn't deserve it back. That she was not a "white bitch" (my friend who is a blonde white girl had pics on the phone this person had obviously seen) stupid enough to return a phone she found. After lots of threats, she said she and her boy would wait for me at:

      Sashacristal8905: i got ball this is my adress 108 20 37 av corona come n do it iam give u the sidekick so I can hit you wit it

      So, anyways..this is my story. If you happen to know these people in the picture please let me know at: stolensidekick@gmail.com I am not going to go to the address posted above, because a.) Not going to waste my time going to a probable fake address b.) If it is real, there will be a physical altercation and I would probably wind up arrested which would do no good to anyone. I'd rather just embarrass the thief as much as possible. Teach them a lesson on the etiquette of returning peoples lost belongings.

      UPDATE #1: Thanx to some cyberwork of friends, found out they have a Myspace acct: http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=us er.viewprofile&friendID=78722066

      UPDATE #2: Some people are asking how we have their pics and AOL name. The way a Sidekick works, is that when you use it, all the data on it get's uploaded automatically to the T-Mobile server. So pictures you have taken, AOL names and passwords u have used, etc are all on the server. So when my friend turned on her new Sidekick and put her new SIM card in, all the data downloaded on to her phone. And that's how we have everything.

      Some people also suggested this may be a ploy of some kind. If you notice, there are NO ads on this website. There are NO outside links besides the one to their MySpace page. I am only doing this to bring embarrassment to people who have no moral value in this world.

      UPDATE #3: More questions answered. My friend left her Sidekick II in a taxi inManhattan (where we live). The person(s) that took it live in Corona Queens which is part of NYC. As for contacting the police, a NYPD officer has contacted me already (he found this link on a blog) and informed me how to handle this situation. My friend and I will stop by a police station tomorrow with the receipt and serial. Another friend at T-Mobile has already gotten us the records we need to prove that these people took the phone as well as the numbers that they called with it. Right now, I am more concerned about spreading this story. I want people to realize that what goes around, comes around. If you find a phone in a taxi or elsewhere.. it is NOT yours.. return it....and when u lose an item, then the same will happen for u.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    3. Re:Slashdotted already by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's been running for a couple days (the whole thing started on the 6th), but I think slashdot finally took it over the edge. The pics are/were nothing special, a young latina (mexican american?) girl, a really big mexican guy. Sorry, no porn. There were some links to the girl, her boyfriend, and the fat guy's myspace pages, for those that get off on geocities-level craptacular page layouts.

      The whole thing is a giant internet pissing contest. Initially it was funny, and I hope the guy gets his sidekick back, but at the same time there's a whole lot of internet lawyering going on there that's pretty childish. The back and forth between the owner and the people that have the sidekick has gone on for about a day too long. It was funny to see the theives act like idiots, it was funny to see the owner thump them. But now it's down to a guy arguing with idiots and getting beaten by experience. The guy needs to realize that nothing he says is going make these folks magically wake up and say "OMFG, I was so wrong. Here's your phone back, sorry for the trouble. Peace be with you."

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    4. Re:Slashdotted already by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      yeah.

      He gave them their chance...now just let the authorities deal with it.

      --
      Bottles.
    5. Re:Slashdotted already by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      I'm not a subscriber, but I got a look at the page a couple days ago when this was news.

    6. Re:Slashdotted already by coolgeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly. And the thieves are dead wrong thinking NYPD has bigger fish to fry. NYPD dispatched a detective to come and arrest an employee at my mom's shop in Manhattan who skimmed $38 from the till. We had the whole thing on the surveillance DVR. Basically, if you collect good evidence and hand them a case that they can chalk up a win on, they will do it. I think our boy has done exactly that. They will be in custody soon. The funny thing is how they multiplied this from a simple misunderstanding where they could have said "sorry, here's your Sidekick back", to now having multiple charges to answer to. I wouldn't put it past an NYC ADA to subpoena a paternity test to see if the guy should be charged with statutory rape.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    7. Re:Slashdotted already by Rimbo · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's been running for a couple days (the whole thing started on the 6th), but I think slashdot finally took it over the edge. The pics are/were nothing special, a young latina (mexican american?) girl, a really big mexican guy. Sorry, no porn. There were some links to the girl, her boyfriend, and the fat guy's myspace pages, for those that get off on geocities-level craptacular page layouts.


      You obviously didn't peruse the rest of the guy's site.

    8. Re:Slashdotted already by Xymor · · Score: 3, Funny
      I have found 8 cell phones in the last couple years in taxis. EVERY single one I have contacted the owner (by leaving a message on their voice mail or by answering their phone and telling their friends that I have the phone) and returned it promptly. When people have found my phone, they have also in turn returned it.
      Wow, I'd like to visit your home dimension someday.
    9. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this garbage being posted on slashdot? I'm seeing junk from Digg here more frequently. Digg is just news for the myspace retards.

    10. Re:Slashdotted already by christopherfinke · · Score: 1
      Sorry, no porn.
      You obviously didn't peruse the rest of the guy's site.
      No kidding. I figured that this was some teenager's site, based on the grammar and spelling on the Sidekick page, but when I browsed to the main site, it turns out it belongs to some 28-year old tech-consultant, porn photographer wannabe who appears to be so full of himself that he has this question in his FAQ:

      Question: Are you dating anyone now?

      Answer: Why? You interested?


      This just reinforces my belief that 99% of FAQ pages aren't actually for Frequently Asked Questions, but for questions the author wishes was frequently asked (e.g., "How can I donate money to your project??").
    11. Re:Slashdotted already by jcr · · Score: 3, Informative

      They FOUND the phone. They aren't guilty of a crime.

      Guess again. Since they know whose it is, they have a legal duty to surrender the property to its rightful owner.

      So, what exactly are the police supposed to do about it?

      They're supposed to restore the property to its owner, and possibly arrest the person who "found" it, if she refuses to give it up.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:Slashdotted already by gkhan1 · · Score: 1
      The pics are/were nothing special, a young latina (mexican american?) girl, a really big mexican guy. Sorry, no porn.

      Ahh, crap, now I have not interest whatsoever in the story!

    13. Re:Slashdotted already by CptTripps · · Score: 1

      I thought it was digg.com that did it...

      http://www.digg.com/technology/How_NOT_to_steal_a_ Sidekick

      --


      My .sig can beat up your honor student.
    14. Re:Slashdotted already by danbeck · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about the same slashdot that foisted on us a poorly written rant about st00pid PHP developers and MySQL, just a few days ago?

      Slashdot is just (overrated) news from a week ago for dorks today.

    15. Re:Slashdotted already by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Informative

      >They FOUND the phone. They aren't guilty of a crime.
      once they used the phone in a manner the owner wouldn't approve of (ie not used in a attempt to return it) they were then commiting a crime of theft.

      The actus reus of theft is usually defined as an unauthorised taking, keeping or using of another's property which must be accompanied by a mens rea of dishonesty and/or the intent to permanently deprive the owner or the person with rightful possession of that property or its use.

      some of the above comment was stolen from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft

    16. Re:Slashdotted already by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depending on which story you believe, They're either theives, or they've accepted stolen property. They found a phone, the owner has contacted them saying he wants it back. He can prove it's his. Pretty much end of story. He didn't relinquish ownership just because he forgot it.

      If you believe they bought it off the cabbie then again, back to the first line. The owner has come forward, can prove the phone is his, and wants it back. The cab driver is guilty of selling stolen goods.

      Most cabs I've taken don't have discount electronics stores in them. So even if they bought it I'm sure they didn't think to themselves "wow, it's my lucky day. I've come across a splendid opportunity from a respectable legitmate business man."

      They're wrong, the owner is right. He's a douche, but he's also right.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    17. Re:Slashdotted already by coolgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you read the page, the NYPD told him to bring the receipt and a serial number to the precinct and fill out a report. Apparently they believe it is a crime.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    18. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in NYC, taking at least 2 cab rides per day, the odds are AGAINST you not finding one.

      They're also against you keeping your health.

    19. Re:Slashdotted already by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Well the guy does live in New York City... I live in the woods in New Hampshire and I've found about 3 cell phones in the last year. So finding 8 in the last few years in such a densely populated area is quite reasonable. (and yes I've contacted the owner/turned into nearby authorities with all the ones I've found)

      Then again I would imagine your computer desk doesn't get as much traffic as the backseat of a Taxi.

    20. Re:Slashdotted already by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      I lost my cell phone in a cab twice in NYC and got it back twice.

      We're good people.

      --

      +++ATH0
    21. Re:Slashdotted already by kchoboter · · Score: 3, Funny

      i like that you stole text from an article on theft :D lol

      --
      4B4556494E
    22. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, the thieves have yet to figure out what's going on. They either think that:

      A) 'Finders keepers', they're innocent, and this guy is just harassing them.

      B) They think they've just commited the perfect crime, and there's no way they can caught for this.

      Either way, they just can't seem to connect the dots, and fathom the possible results of their poorly thought-out actions. That's probably why one is a 16 year old mother.

      Think about it. Do you remember being that dumb when you were 16 (Or 15, or 14, whatever age the girl was when she got knocked up)? NO! You don't! That's why you read /.!

    23. Re:Slashdotted already by SigILL · · Score: 1

      That's not theft, it's not even copyright infringement. It's paraphrasing, and thus fair use (note: IANAL).

      Let's not start parrotting the **AA.

      --
      Error: password can't contain reverse spelling of ancient Chinese emperor
    24. Re:Slashdotted already by Buran · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone referring to these people as thieves? They FOUND the phone. They aren't guilty of a crime.

      Possession of stolen property. They are aware it does not belong to them (not that you need to be aware of it to be guilty, though police don't normally charge you if you were unaware). I could buy a car from a guy off the street who didn't have legal title, and still be forced to surrender it. If I did not, I would be guilty and charged. This is a pretty open and shut case given that they know how to contact the owner, the owner has repeatedly demanded his property back without involving police, and they have not done so.

      The police will now find out who they are, if the crime is reported (and there are plenty of photos here to use to find them), seize the phone, and bring charges against them.

      They should have handed it over immediately. Now they deserve every bit of hurt they get.

      So what if the taxi driver sold it? And speaking of the driver, the taxi driver is the one who is guilty of theft. He knew it wasn't his and took it anyway.

    25. Re:Slashdotted already by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common law is that the finder of a lost item could claim the right to possess the item against any other person in the world except the true owner. If I find a phone on the street, it is mine unless someone who can prove ownership asks me for it. I am not obliged to look for them, and I am not obliged to return it in the absense of proof of their ownership.

      They found a phone and got an SMS from a third party advising them that there was a reward for its return. Then they got a message via AOL asking for them to come return it. I highly doubt that ANY of this would hold up in court. There's no proof of identity or proof of ownership inherent in either of these that would compel the finder to act.

      The cops asked them to come down with evidence of ownership. When the evidence is present, and all parties are present, at that time, if they are asked to return the phone and do not, THEN they are guity of a crime. But until then, they're no more obliged to go out of their way to meet the woman who lost the phone than they would be if I were to send them a message and ask them to come give me the phone.

      I would imagine this is why the cops asked them to bring the reciept and contact information of the person who found it down.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    26. Re:Slashdotted already by codegen · · Score: 1
      They FOUND the phone. They aren't guilty of a crime.

      You may be correct on the phone itself. The moment that they used it to access the TMobile account, use it to access thier AOL account or make a phone call with it (the page referenced says that the owner was able to get a list of calls made by the them) then it becomes theft of services. That would definitely interest the police

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    27. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is everyone referring to these people as thieves? They FOUND the phone. They aren't guilty of a crime.
      You, my friend, are an idiot.

    28. Re:Slashdotted already by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... there's the whole issue of theft of service. Even if we grant them a "finders keepers" waiver for the physical phone, the use of the phone subscription is a separate offense.

    29. Re:Slashdotted already by duffstone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just to reinforce your point, I've seen the OKCPD do the same thing... over a stupid little cell phone... Evidently they don't take kindly to threats and extortion.

      Believe it or not, these guys found my friends Cell phone, used it, and when they were contacted by "Us" they would only return it if we promised to pay a certian sum of cash... So we called the cops, they had us set up the meeting, they staked it out, and when the thieves took the money... I shit you not atleast 10 cops came out of the woodwork including one undercover in street clothes and 4 squad cars... Kewlest thing I've ever seen on a friday night.

      All for a cell phone... Moral: Don't steal phones in oklahoma cause the OKCPD gets bored...

    30. Re:Slashdotted already by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      Then again I would imagine your computer desk doesn't get as much traffic as the backseat of a Taxi. Oh I could take that so many places....

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    31. Re:Slashdotted already by Dantu · · Score: 1
      Common law is that the finder of a lost item could claim the right to possess the item against any other person in the world except the true owner.

      If that's true in the US, I'm glad I'm Canadian. Here (and in the UK believe) if you find an item and keep it, you must make 'reasonable' efforts to return the item before it becomes yours. (One easy way to do this it to give it to the local police, if no one clames it after some time period, it's yours.) Once you are in contact with the 'true' owner, you are obliged to care for the item until the owner claims it (or for some time limit such as 90 days) and may be liable for any damage to the item while it is in your care.

    32. Re:Slashdotted already by charlesnw · · Score: 1
      hen again I would imagine your computer desk doesn't get as much traffic as the backseat of a Taxi.
      Oh I could take that so many places :)
      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    33. Re:Slashdotted already by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      It's based on common law. Which has roots that extend back to the UK, and further back to the Roman empire. In the absense of additional subsequent legislation, which does exist in some but not all areas, it holds true in Canada, US, UK, Australia, etc.

      I'm Canadian too. If there's a law that stipulates that I must actively look for the owner of something that I find in a public place, I've never heard of it.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    34. Re:Slashdotted already by jemenake · · Score: 1
      The guy needs to realize that nothing he says is going make these folks magically wake up and say "OMFG, I was so wrong. Here's your phone back, sorry for the trouble. Peace be with you."
      Exactly. When you're in a dispute, you have to consider the sophistication of your opponent. Getting into a pissing match with people from "da 'hood" isn't going to get you anywhere because pissing is their stock in trade. Check their myspace pages. The backgrounds are all pimped cars, gold chains, guns, and all that "gangsta" puffery. You might get them to "take shelter" (ie, changing their myspace page to ask to be left alone) for a little while, but you're *never* *ever* going to get them to go "I just can't take your relentless cyber-taunting a minute longer. Please, come take this cursed device away from me and never let it darken my doorstep again!!!". You must realize that, the biggest humiliation of all to them would be if they CAVED IN, so trying to humiliate them into doing just that is pointless.

      What this guy really needed to do is give these punks no indication that he knew their identity until a nice officer knocked on their door.
    35. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend was going for a job interview in manhattan. As she was walking across the street, she dropped her phone. She realized it as she reached the other sidewalk, of course someone ran out and stole her phone before she could go back and get it. Then in the 4 hour period that she was at her interview the phone had already been resold and some hefty international calls were placed. Got to love that cesspit you call NYC.

    36. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they'd be Frequently Unasked Questions? I like those.

    37. Re:Slashdotted already by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      It's that way in the US as well. I can still remember an episode of the old "Andy Griffith Show". Opie found a bunch of money. His dad the Sherrif made him turn it in to the police station. After waiting for a certain period of time with no one trying to claim it (or report it stolen, etc), it became Opie's.

    38. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone checked out this guy's real website?

      http://www.evanwashere.com/main.html

      WOW. who is this dude?

    39. Re:Slashdotted already by n0ah84 · · Score: 1

      Everybody loves to FUQ

      --
      ..i didnt do it..
    40. Re:Slashdotted already by thc69 · · Score: 1
      Got to love that cesspit you call NYC.
      In an attempt to prove to my wife what a "cesspit" NYC is, I googled the crime statistics. To my surprise, it wasn't too bad at all. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_york_city#Crime for the statistics -- 2,800 crimes per 100,000 people. That's half as much crime as quiet suburban Cumberland, RI.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    41. Re:Slashdotted already by thej1nx · · Score: 1
      Selective in our arguements, aren't we ?

      Mate, you are an idiot. Yes, You do not have a *duty* to actively look for the owner.

      But should the owner locate you instead and demand his property back, you do have a duty to return it to him. Refusing to do so, is definitely theft.

    42. Re:Slashdotted already by thej1nx · · Score: 1
      All well said.

      But stop being too stupid to consider the fact that thieves did not even once ask the owner to provide proof of ownership. Have you even RTFA ?

      The thieves simply refused to return the phone. No demand of proof of ownership. They *had* been emailed on the stolen mobile to return it to the owner. They refused to make any effort to respond back, as required by law in almost any civilized country. They were contacted by the owner repeatedly which the owner has supposedly kept a record of. They did not even ask for proof of ownership. They simply argued that since they had found it, and owner was too careless, she did not deserve the phone back. Period.

      That definitely qualifies as theft.

    43. Re:Slashdotted already by TheRavenofNight · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but he's freakin' hot. And those girls (and the car) ain't too bad either.

    44. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's your attitude, I think I'd rather you stayed out.

    45. Re:Slashdotted already by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      RTFA. They're claiming they bought the phone from the cab driver, and they won't give it back because then they'd be out the money they paid for it. If they're innocent they shouldn't have any problem going to the police to try to recoup their money from the cab driver.

    46. Re:Slashdotted already by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      I hear you about you handing them the evidence and they'll only do something they can win with no effort.

      Someone started using my credit card online ordering some books on how to use google ads to sell stuff and some porno stuff.

      Anyway I was in posession of the card so I figured it had to be a waitress at a restraunt or a 'friend' of mine who was in my house or something.

      Anyway, the sites both gave the the same IP address used to order these things and it was a local IP address on the same ISP that I use. The ISP wouldn't give me any information but they said they would give it to the police. Imagine the police having to make one phone call to find out who it was....nope. Too much work for them. Plus that said that is no evidence. They need video footage of them using my credit card number. Stupid lazy doughnut eating police.

    47. Re:Slashdotted already by papercut2a · · Score: 1

      In every state in the U.S., you can go to court and file a civil case against the miscreant (generally filed against "John Doe" since you don't know who it is yet), presumably for credit card fraud, then have the court issue a subpoena to the ISP. Once you have the info back from the ISP, you can either continue the civil case yourself or see if the local district attorney is interested.

    48. Re:Slashdotted already by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If there's a law that stipulates that I must actively look for the owner of something that I find in a public place, I've never heard of it.

      At least in the States I've lived in the law is you turn it into the police, they note who brought it in and when, then in 60-90 days you can go claim it if the rightful owner hasn't.

      You don't have to look for the owner, he has to go looking for his stuff; if it's in a known location (the police station) it works out better.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    49. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you find something and don't return it when given the opportunity its called "Theft by finding".

      At least here in the UK it is!

    50. Re:Slashdotted already by jcr · · Score: 1

      I don't think you'll find that term in American law, but the principle applies here as well.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    51. Re:Slashdotted already by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      NYC hasn't been a crime infested cesspool since the mid 90s. Now Atlanta on the other hand...

  2. And the reason she didn't just cancel her service? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1, Funny
    ?

    Were the pictures nude?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  3. Wait, so stupidity is news? by Tebriel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since when is stupidity news?

    Oh, wait.....

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    1. Re:Wait, so stupidity is news? by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Funny

      as leno would say, What doi love? STUPID CRIMINALS. People like this exist simply for the amusement of the rest of us.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:Wait, so stupidity is news? by Gryle · · Score: 1

      When it's in the "Politics" section

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  4. Subscribers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but diggers can beat the rush and see it early!

  5. How not to get revenge... by BenHoltz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well ... Sounds like somone is on a Personal Vendetta... I say post all the creep's info.

    1. Re:How not to get revenge... by m-wielgo · · Score: 1

      Someone went to their house and videotaped the experience already...

  6. Wait, so mistakes is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About the same time that being perfect will be.

  7. Oh My! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those Silly Hiltons! Oh what will they do next!

  8. Crime 101 by zpeidar · · Score: 1

    This seems just as stupid as hacking a webpage, just to put your familypictures in the index.html. Crime 101: Don't leave clues by choice. Unless you've been living in a cave, you'd know from the TV that the bad guys always get busted if they try to pull an Dr. Evil or Murdoc-plot. If you get caught, then you haven't watched enough CSI. Seriously, who steals such an item and starts using it? Wouldn't selling it seem like a better idea?

    1. Re:Crime 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This seems just as stupid as hacking a webpage, just to put your familypictures in the index.html. Crime 101: Don't leave clues by choice. Unless you've been living in a cave, you'd know from the TV that the bad guys always get busted if they try to pull an Dr. Evil or Murdoc-plot. If you get caught, then you haven't watched enough CSI. Seriously, who steals such an item and starts using it? Wouldn't selling it seem like a better idea?


      Ummmmm...

      This chick subscribes to AOL; how smart do you imagine she is?
  9. D'oh by Blue6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure where the SideKick is, but the fat dude in the pictures needs to hop on that exercise bike out on the porch.

    --
    EGOTIST, n. A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me.
    1. Re:D'oh by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      I think they have to exercise after we slashdotted their myspace account. From one of their profiles:

      "yoooo u stupid ass pp better stop messing wit me id have ya fucking phone ya better stop messing wit me ya dont no who u messing wit so leav me the fuck alone iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii donnnnnnt haveeeee yourrrr fuccckkkiiingggg phone soooooooo leav me aaaaaaalllooone
      Who I'd like to meet:"

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:D'oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it can support his weight.

    3. Re:D'oh by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is cruel and unusual punishment for an exercise bike.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    4. Re:D'oh by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out how he left a Suzuki in a taxi, let alone how he took pictures with it.

    5. Re:D'oh by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Superheroes TM are always losing their sidekicks.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. heh heh by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Posting rmluckyguy@aol.com 's email to the front page of slashdot is one way to get revenge I suppose. My guess is that email address just became unusable.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:heh heh by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      Can anyone recommend a freely available outgoing email service so that we can tender a lovely hello to these charming people?

    2. Re:heh heh by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Hotmail

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    3. Re:heh heh by spongebue · · Score: 1

      Since it's an AOL address, of course it's unusable.

    4. Re:heh heh by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      My guess is that email address just became unusable
      No, my email with goatse attachment just got through.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  11. Security risk? by mikesd81 · · Score: 2, Informative
    • FTA:

    UPDATE #2: Some people are asking how we have their pics and AOL name. The way a Sidekick works, is that when you use it, all the data on it get's uploaded automatically to the T-Mobile server. So pictures you have taken, AOL names and passwords u have used, etc are all on the server. So when my friend turned on her new Sidekick and put her new SIM card in, all the data downloaded on to her phone. And that's how we have everything.

    Now, that's a great thing so you really don't lose anything....but with alot of information been getting, um, lost lately in the media news, I dont know if I like things like that located centrally somewhere. If I lose something like that, I perfer it to all be lost and I have to start from scratch. Just like a hacked server. You don't just do backup restores, you reload from scratch.
    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:Security risk? by kwalker · · Score: 1

      That is reason #2 why I won't own a Sidekick, even though they're about the best QWERTY phone available in the American market.

      Incidentally, reason #1 is because I can't write my own software for them.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    2. Re:Security risk? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't let others get your info (they have the sidekick) it lets you keep a copy.

      unless you don't trust T-mobiles security (which has been shown to be lapse), but the feature itself is plenty safe, especialy in the lost phone scenario.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  12. Re:And the reason she didn't just cancel her servi by zpeidar · · Score: 1

    Neh, a few portraits, one of her backside, and one of some dude in a sofa. None of them qualify as nude.

  13. Conflict resolution by Space+Sku · · Score: 5, Funny

    at its finest. "i got ball this is my adress 108 20 37 av corona come n do it iam give u the sidekick so I can hit you wit it" awesome.

    1. Re:Conflict resolution by rindeee · · Score: 5, Funny

      This will undoubtedly replace "All your base..." for greatest cliche Internet tag line.

    2. Re:Conflict resolution by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny
      i got ball...

      Clearly not happy fun ball.

    3. Re:Conflict resolution by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      That's a lot of numbers in that address. Maybe it's just me, but that "address" looks more like a phone number.

    4. Re:Conflict resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

    5. Re:Conflict resolution by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Could certainly be 20 37th Ave, apartment 108 or something like that.

    6. Re:Conflict resolution by ticklish2day · · Score: 1

      And "I got pressure, you got pressure" from the Bus Uncle.

    7. Re:Conflict resolution by MicrowavedH2O · · Score: 1

      yeah-- I wouldn't want to mess with "her and her boy" ...especially if "her boy" is that fat guy.

      *please don't sit on me!*

    8. Re:Conflict resolution by Moofie · · Score: 1

      That reads like a transcript of Koko the gorilla's sign language conversations.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Conflict resolution by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      That address is in Queens, NYC it would properly be written as 108-20 37th Avenue Corona, NY. If it is a real address I wold imagine it is a large apartment building.

    10. Re:Conflict resolution by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

      Absolutlely. Still, I'd go to that address and go all Leeroy Jenkins on those people.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    11. Re:Conflict resolution by KC7JHO · · Score: 0

      i got ball this is my adress!

    12. Re:Conflict resolution by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Hey, just because she's almost completely illiterate doesn't mean I wouldn't hit that like Babe Ruth.

      --

      +++ATH0
    13. Re:Conflict resolution by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      In the strictest sense, you probably wouldn't want to go Leroy Jenkins on them... It helps nothing if you go in to get the sidekick and end up causing a group wipe...

      On a serious note, these people are knuckleheads. Under normal circumstances the NYPD could have claimed that they were too busy, but with the publilicty it practically forces them to make arrests and retrieve the stolen property.

      And just to think if they had just returned the damn thing... I never realized that pandoras box would look like a sidekick...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    14. Re:Conflict resolution by DeepStream · · Score: 1

      nope ... queens addresses are just like that.

      108-20 37th ave just means that it's on 37th ave near 108th st. corona is mostly 2 or 3-family units.

    15. Re:Conflict resolution by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      nope ... queens addresses are just like that.

      108-20 37th ave just means that it's on 37th ave near 108th st. corona is mostly 2 or 3-family units.


      What did you write that is different then how I wrote that address. And I was thinking of the area near Lefrak City, it could be up north more but I'm not to familar with Corona as I like my hubcaps attached to my car.

    16. Re:Conflict resolution by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I got ball"
      That guy is really gutsy for being short a teste.

    17. Re:Conflict resolution by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Happy Fun Ball may stick to some types of skin.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    18. Re:Conflict resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "i got ball"

      This could be the next AYBABTU-type slogan. Hey everybody, I got ball, so you best come correct. Goddamn, that is some seriously intimidating lingo.

  14. Your stupidity is certainly not news. by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh, grow up. This is an interesting, useful story. Even if it were just about stupidity, it would be worth reading — there's an art to dealing with stupid people. Besides, the story is also this guy's attempts to pressure the Sidekick's new "owner" to give it back — and it's unexpected conseequences.

    1. Re:Your stupidity is certainly not news. by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      Oh, grow up. This is an interesting, useful story. Even if it were just about stupidity, it would be worth reading -- there's an art to dealing with stupid people.

      You are correct but it is also about the power of the Web to spread to many people very quickly without the help of commercial journalism.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  15. Idiots by blindbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whether or not they stole the phone or not, possession of stolen property is just as much a crime as the actual theft. Thieves like these people need to be sent to a country where the crime of theft is a loss of extreminities. I for one am tired of working 9-5, 5 days a week, only to find that some jask*ss wants to spend 35 seconds throwing a rock through my car window to steal all they can and destroy everything they cannot. I hate thieves just as much as I hate the government... oh wait, they are the same thing, right?

    1. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please try to calm down. All this hate cannot be good for you.

      Thank you for sparing me the shock of that "a" in jackass, though. That was a nice touch.

    2. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, 12? The reason you can afford to have such pretty valuables on display in your nice car is because you live in a country whose government makes it its business to steal foreign resources and labour (or appropriate them at prices which are tantamount to stealing).

    3. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that he lives in Russia...

    4. Re:Idiots by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you also missed the changing of 'c' to 's'? I think that word is sufficiently obfuscated.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    5. Re:Idiots by alfs+boner · · Score: 1
      You want to know what's funny? I work waaaaaaaay less than that, and judging by the content of your post still make more money than you.

      :)

      I guess you should have did better in school, huh?

      --
      Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    6. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he should have done better in school. I believe you should have done better also.

    7. Re:Idiots by beef+curtains · · Score: 1

      I guess you should have did better in school, huh?

      I guess your high-paying job doesn't require you to use correct grammar, huh?

      On a related note, it sounds like getting promoted from mop duty to drive-through has really paid off. How long until you're the assistant night manager for your Taco Bell location?

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    8. Re:Idiots by JazzLad · · Score: 0

      Should have /did/? - Karma=bad I care=no

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    9. Re:Idiots by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Thieves like these people need to be sent to a country where the crime of theft is a loss of extreminities. I for one am tired of working 9-5, 5 days a week, only to find that some jask*ss wants to spend 35 seconds throwing a rock through my car window to steal all they can and destroy everything they cannot.
      awww - pissed off because someone can steal or deface your bling?

      I suggest a priority re-evaluation.

    10. Re:Idiots by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I for one am [...]

      I read that as "arm" and then "damn man, I thought you meant, like, fingers or hands; take the whole arm? That's heartless."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    11. Re:Idiots by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Stealing takes far more balls than sitting behind a desk. Personally I think that capitalist upper-class scum who hoard excessive possessions deserve to have them trimmed how and again. If you're rich enough to own a car AND an electronic device, then you can afford insurance, so what are you complaining about?

      Btw 9-5 5 days a week is nothing, try working 7-7 7 days a week then complain.

    12. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not - the implication was that he lived in the US. You might want to improve your education (political and otherwise) so that, in future, you can understand jokes slightly more complex than "Why did the chicken cross the road?"

  16. Not the brightest people on the planet by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, let's give the alleged thieves the benefit of the doubt. No matter what their story (and isn't it interesting to see how their stories change), it should be quite clear to them now that the Sidekick does not belong to them, and whether purchased from someone or found, they now have an object that has been reported stolen, making them accessories, no matter how you cut it. IANAL, but it doesn't take a shark to smell blood.

    What makes this truly outrageous is that it doesn't occur to them that they've been found out. Thanks to Evan's website, everyone and his uncle knows about this:

    From the web site:Update #12: June 7th, 7:00 p.m. eastern Sorry for the lack of updates...I answered emails till 1 p.m. and then had to leave to work...But I made it a short day so I could come back and give everyone an update..Wasn't that nice of me :-) Anyways.... I see that I have over 900 emails since 1 p.m. I will try and answer as many as I can. I will also add all the links you sent me to the ones below...I quickly scrolled though and must have counted at least 100-200 new links. I also have received emails from people offering me ISP hosting...As of right now, I should be good. I have unlimited bandwidth with this company...and so far I have not gotten the "digg" effect.(almost 3,200 at least count!). I have also talked to some radio stations. New York's 1010 WINS being one of them. Interviews are being scheduled for this week.

    They might have been able to save face once they were "caught," but now it's going to be impossible. What's worse, they're stupid enough to keep using the thing, compounding their trouble!

    It goes to show the power of the Internet though; once something is out there, the information is global in minutes. And there are pictures! These folks are not going to be able to hide for a long time... unless they wind up in a penitentiary somewhere.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Not the brightest people on the planet by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      My hypothesis is that the people who stole it naïvely think that the guy is bluffing, puffing out his chest. In their minds, the law says, "Finder keepers losers weepers," not caveat emptor.

  17. myspace visibility by beowulfy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I love how this goes to show how easy it is for anyone to find out information about you, and the people you know with social networking sites. You had better think twice about creating a myspace page if ever engage in any kind of criminal activity no matter seemingly small or insigificant it is. Granted the people who were involved here were exceedingly stupid. Cue up the "stupidity of people on myspace" jokes....

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -Hunter S. Thompson
    1. Re:myspace visibility by balance+one · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm so removing you from my top 8! GRRRRRRRRR

    2. Re:myspace visibility by Firehed · · Score: 1
      Cue up the "stupidity of people on myspace" jokes...
      There's a joke to be made about it? I thought it was plain fact...
      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:myspace visibility by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > Granted the people who were involved here were exceedingly stupid.
      why? I would guess their exact actions would go un-prosecuted 99% of the time, being law breakers they probably know that. If they do get prosecuted it probably cost them under a $1000, no jail time. This is a good example of how vindictive (and ingenuitive) victims can catch up to you. I have been the victim before, having a name and photo of someone for a crime under $1000 didn't get me anything. Unless you yourself do the work of getting their current address and suepenas, etc (I did, but I had more time than money back then). Even being on video, and giving your name out at a non-violent crime wouldn't be all that stupid unless you hit the wrong mark.

    4. Re:myspace visibility by beowulfy · · Score: 1

      Well, I still think they are pretty damn stupid regardless of how likely it was that they were to be caught. Besides, their chances of being caught would have quickly dropped to zero had they just not used the sidekick the way they did. That 1% prosecution rate is sure hurtin' like a bitch now isn't it?

      --
      "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -Hunter S. Thompson
  18. Police? by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

    So, I suppose this isn't technically stealing, but it could be if you find something and keep it. So with the pictures being on the thing, why not go to the police and tell them the story and fill out a report? Apparently all the information is there.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:Police? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suppose this isn't technically stealing

      Maybe not, but posession of stolen property is a felony. They know that it's stolen property. There's a police report filed regarding the stolen property. T-Mobile is apparently going to shut off the service, which means they're convinced it's stolen property.

      If this guy really is an MP then he's putting his military career in jeopardy. This is the sort of thing that could get him booted out of the military, possibly after a trip to the brig, and undoubtedly with a dishonorable discharge.

    2. Re:Police? by pedalman · · Score: 1
      If this guy really is an MP then he's putting his military career in jeopardy. This is the sort of thing that could get him booted out of the military, possibly after a trip to the brig, and undoubtedly with a dishonorable discharge.
      I guarantee you that if the young man is truly in the military, and his commanding officer and 1st sergeant get wind of this, they will throw him to the wolves before they let their asses get put in a sling.
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    3. Re:Police? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yep. Oh yea. He could be under the brig. Isn't sending a threatening email illegal in it's own right? It also makes the Police look bad. Can't they locate the phone with the 911 location system? They have pictures, email addresses, MySpace accounts and now a LOT of publicity. Seem like this should be a nice high profile bust with little effort on there part. Throw the threats from the MP in and hand that to News service and you got a lovely story. Military Police officer threatens civilian to protect sister that stole a cell phone. Film at 11PM. Followed by an interview with his CO.
      Ouch.....

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Police? by StressedEd · · Score: 1
      I don't know what the US laws are like, but over here in the UK if you find someone's lost property and keep it that's "stealing by finding". If the person is caught they can be prosecuted. I know this due to the "loss" of a laptop and an ensuing conversation with the boys in blue. Unfortunately it still hasn't phoned home, so I can't track the blighter....


      As an addendum, I talked on the phone with a police officer explaining my desire to find the cuprit by tracing their IP etc and he understood, and was highly encouraging. Ah well...


      It will be keeping somone elses lap hot now... (It was a PowerBook)...

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    5. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...posession of stolen property is a felony.

      So I guess that makes every land owner on the planet a felon? (oh, -they- may have bought it... but at one point, someone did ``claim'' it is theirs and killed everyone who lived there before).

    6. Re:Police? by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      So, I suppose this isn't technically stealing, ...

      At a minimum , it was criminal conversion. Now that they have been contacted by the rightful owner, it IS stealing.
      The rest of us learned very early that you don't keep things that don't belong to you. Some people missed that lesson apparently.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    7. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't own land, silly.

      Well, not magma, anyway.

    8. Re:Police? by ??? · · Score: 3, Informative

      New York State Consolidated Laws
      TITLE J
      OFFENSES INVOLVING THEFT
      ARTICLE 155
      LARCENY ...
      S 155.00 Larceny; definitions of terms.
          The following definitions are applicable to this title: ...
          7-c. "Access device" means any telephone calling card number, credit
      card number, account number, mobile identification number, electronic
      serial number or personal identification number that can be used to
      obtain telephone service. ...
      S 155.05 Larceny; defined.
          1. A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to
      deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to
      a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property
      from an owner thereof.
          2. Larceny includes a wrongful taking, obtaining or withholding of
      another`s property, with the intent prescribed in subdivision one of
      this section, committed in any of the following ways: ...
          (b) By acquiring lost property.
          A person acquires lost property when he exercises control over
      property of another which he knows to have been lost or mislaid, or to
      have been delivered under a mistake as to the identity of the recipient
      or the nature or amount of the property, without taking reasonable
      measures to return such property to the owner; ...
      S 155.30 Grand larceny in the fourth degree.
          A person is guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree when he
      steals property and when:
          1. The value of the property exceeds one thousand dollars; or ...
          10. The property consists of an access device which the person intends
      to use unlawfully to obtain telephone service.
          Grand larceny in the fourth degree is a class E felony.

    9. Re:Police? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Is it the fat guy claiming to be an MP?
      If so I call bullshit. However on the same vein, can that be then construed as imitating a police officer or some such (which my guess says is actually a bigger crime than the rest thrown together)?

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:Police? by trewornan · · Score: 1

      Well that's a bit debateable, you can own the theoretical "property" which exists *in* the land (in the UK at least), while that may not technically be the same as plain ownership of the land the difference is moot. All types of title were reduced to just two back in Victorian times: "fee simple absolute in possession" (freehold) and "term of years absolute in possession" (leasehold) but, the freehold still exists on leasehold land and therefore all land is held "in fee" (also note that possession is not ownership). While all this may have made a lot of difference under the feudal system it has little real meaning in modern times.

    11. Re:Police? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      It is stealing, morally 100% and probably by law, too. They didn't find the phone in a public place, they found it in the back of a NY taxi. They had the means of returning the phone to the owner sitting 3 feet in front of them (the driver would surely have taken care of it) but they decided to hang on to the phone and to even stupidly start using it.

      There are countried with very harsh penalties for this kind of stupid shit, and I find it hard to criticise them when I see shit liek this.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    12. Re:Police? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      No. If you read the website you'll find a link to a pic of the MP. He's much thinner, and in fatigues. I think if he's still active duty, he's pretty much screwed himself over REAL good. :)

  19. Not that sort of sidekick, then by Captain+Zep · · Score: 5, Funny
    I thought this was going to be a story about Batman and Robin.

    Z.

    1. Re:Not that sort of sidekick, then by JianTian13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, the fscked up thing here is, so did I...

    2. Re:Not that sort of sidekick, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It involves Fatman and Robbin'. Is that close enough?

    3. Re:Not that sort of sidekick, then by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought it was a story featuring Chuck Norris and Jonathan Brandis...

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  20. "V for Vigilante" or "Finders Keepers" by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    It was still up thirty seconds ago (come on, laugh, it's a joke).

    I have a few random thoughts, but don't take these too seriously, because really, I don't care. From Evan's bio on the site: "I have no shame in my game." Granted, he did stop short of posting pictures of the lady's baby, but I'm not a big fan of vigilante justice. Couple the first statement with the utterly lame flash intro, the javascript disabling of the right-click menu, and the fact his website is written in ancient HTML 3.2, and I think it's obvious this is not a clear cut case of good versus evil. On an actual serious vein, perhaps someone can explain how finders keepers fits into this legally. Sure she didn't intend to leave it in the taxi, and clearly from an ethical standpoint the finder should make a reasonble effort (as in paying attention to the "reward for returning this" messages she sent) to return it, but could it be considered abandoned? Do taxi or other service companies have any special obligations regarding their customer's empty-headedness?

    1. Re:"V for Vigilante" or "Finders Keepers" by jcr · · Score: 1

      explain how finders keepers fits into this legally.

      Legally, the girl who "found" the sidekick has no right to keep it, given that she knows whose it is. By refusing to give it to its rightful owner, she's a thief.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:"V for Vigilante" or "Finders Keepers" by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Since they sent messages to the phone indicating a reward if found, it could hardly be considered abandoned.

  21. OT But idiots are just plain stupid by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was watching a police videos show the other day and they had a segment on a copuple of teens who were drving around some town at night with paint ball guns and doing "drive bys" on unsuspecting pedestrians. And to top it all off they were video taping the whole thing and had lots of colourful narrative to go with the action.

    This all came to an end with their last victim who they "shot" in full view of a police cruiser (which you actually see on the tape)

    Man my jaw dropped. I was astounded at their level of stupidity.

    Mind you the Dumb and Dumber bank robbers in Denver made me laugh my ass off as well. Although not in this article, I do remember that they were caught with pictures of themselves in "gansta" poses hlding their "loot"

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by tylernt · · Score: 1
      This all came to an end with their last victim who they "shot" in full view of a police cruiser
      It could have been worse. Their "victim" might have pulled a REAL gun and returned fire.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >It could have been worse. Their "victim" might have pulled a REAL gun and returned fire.

      Where I live, deadly force would be justifiable, if you were assualted with a paintball gun.
      The fact that paintball matches require protective gear is all the evidence you would need to support the apprehension of being put in danger.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh... let's all hail Jeb for that little bit of legislative stupidity.

      Man: I shot him in self defense.
      Officer: Thirty-seven times!?

      You know it's coming...

      --Nick

    4. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oooh... let's all hail Jeb for that little bit of legislative stupidity.


      Why? Because you're too much of a wuss to defend yourself? That would fit the mold of a pasty white geek slashdotter. Either that or you're a criminal who likes a nice sheeplike population.

      When I lived in Arizona the one thing I loved is that it seemed like nearly everybody packed firepower, and as such you respected folks because you just didn't know if they had a piece on them. I see so much convoluted crap about "how crime would go through the roof" and there'd be "wild west type shootouts". Bullshit. If somebody doesn't abide by their concealed carry permit or if they've been found guilty of injuring/killing somebody who was not a threat then put them in the clink. On the other hand if you fuck with somebody and get capped well then those are the breaks.

    5. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Oooh... let's all hail Jeb for that little bit of legislative stupidity.

      That would be Janet Napolitano, the liberal Democrat.

      I'm one too, and I still say that you have a right to defend yourself in the face of a reasonable apprehension of a deadly threat.

      A drive-by shooting with a paintball gun is such a threat, whether you think so or not.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not just that, but at the time of getting shot by the paintball, you have no reasonable explaination that it ISN'T a paintball gun.

      With the adrenalin flowing you just feel impact, and then the wet dye, prompting you to think you had been just shot with a real gun.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    7. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The only "wild west type shootout" I've ever seen was at a drive-in movie theatre in Texas (the Lone Star, I think that's Duncanville, can't remember.)

      Very scary.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Where I live, people respect each other because we're civilised and polite to each other. I prefer a society based on mutual respect than one based on fear but I guess it's a matter of personal preference.

    9. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      Green splatter all over your shirt is resasonable enough for the non-vulcans in the crowd.

    10. Re:OT But idiots are just plain stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here, here! i was going to reply to the gp, but you said it better. i find it intensely depressing that so many people ascribe to the notion that packing firepower should net you respect.

  22. one question on this by jeffs72 · · Score: 0
    If you leave a phone in a taxi, can you really consider it 'stolen'?

    --
    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.
    1. Re:one question on this by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      If the new owners admit they realize it belongs to you, but won't give it back, I'd say so. Maybe not legally, but certainly morally.

    2. Re:one question on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. Theft of lost property is usually called "theft by unlawful taking".

    3. Re:one question on this by Johnny5000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you leave a phone in a taxi, can you really consider it 'stolen'?

      If the person who finds it uses the service that they're not authorized to use, I would imagine that counts for something in the realm of stealing.

      Say you find a wallet full of cash. I'm not sure of the legality of keeping it for yourself, and it's a jerky thing to do anyway , but it's definitely illegal to try to use the credit cards that you're not authorized to use. Using their phone service without permission is probably similar.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    4. Re:one question on this by bhima · · Score: 1

      Where I live, there is no question, it's certainly stolen.

      Judging by the dude's webpage and the response from NYPD I'd say that's the case in the US as well.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    5. Re:one question on this by Cybrex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once the rightful owner contacts you requesting its return, and you flat-out refuse because their "white ass doesn't deserve it", yes. At that point it's stolen.

      They're scum for not returning it. They're idiots for not returning it when a reward was offered.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    6. Re:one question on this by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      It's not stolen, it's obiously lost. But if you then take it and don't try to track down the owner, start using it (running up charges for the owner), and then refuse to answer the owner's request that it be returned even with a reward, it's most definitely stolen.

      Even if it was "sold" to her by the cab driver, as she said caveat emptor comes into play, as the lawyer on TFA suggests.

    7. Re:one question on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many jurisdictions you can only legally keep it (sidekick, wallet, whatever) after making a legitimate attempt to return it to the owner.

    8. Re:one question on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you find a WALLET full of cash, then taking the money would be stealing. If you just found the cash, then there's not much you can do to find the owner...best thing to do would be to turn it into the police, and if no one claims it, it becomes yours.

    9. Re:one question on this by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Once the rightful owner contacts you requesting its return, and you flat-out refuse because their "white ass doesn't deserve it", yes. At that point it's stolen.
      "

      It also moves from "theft" into "hate crime" at that point.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:one question on this by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

      Actually, In NY, the crime of larceny includes acquiring lost property. See NY Penal Law section 155.05(2)(b).

    11. Re:one question on this by Cartack · · Score: 0

      You lost me when you compared use of a phone to using a credit card. definately not in the same ballpark

    12. Re:one question on this by Bilbo · · Score: 1
      > You lost me when you compared use of a phone to using a credit card

      They are both "services" that someone else is paying for (or has paid for). A credit card is basically a "service" allowing you quick access to "borrowing" money against a credit account in order to buy goods. Federal law has very explicit regulations about using a "device" (cell phone or other) to access services that someone else has paid for, without their permission.

      --
      Your Servant, B. Baggins
    13. Re:one question on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you leave a phone in a taxi, can you really consider it 'stolen'?

      Yes -- and if people don't know this, then what the hell are they teaching in schools these days? Is it any wonder that our society is so morally degenerate?

    14. Re:one question on this by Cartack · · Score: 0

      Ahh i understand, you are saying that "technically" its a federal crime to use someones cell without permission... just like its "technically" a federal crime to steal wifi.

    15. Re:one question on this by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Most likely legally. As another poster mentioned, As another comment mentioned, England has a concept of "Stealing by Finding", and I would expect other legal systems do as well. The finder certainly has no claim to it, and it's quite clear who this belongs to. The rightful owner is easy to track. If they genuinely thought it was purchased legally (e.g. they bought it in a pawn shop), they might not get prosecuted for stealing, but they would still have to return it.

    16. Re:one question on this by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Stealing wifi really is theft. Theft really is a crime.

      Yes, someone may have spare wifi capacity. They may also have bandwidth to the net to spare. Then, the damage done is only technical.

      What if they don't? What if they have to pay extra because you're using half or more of the bandwidth they're renting (you don't really ever "buy" bandwidth outside your LAN, do you)? I'd call that stealing. Rent your own damn bandwidth.

    17. Re:one question on this by dirgotronix · · Score: 1

      I'm a cab driver, and people leave things in cabs all the time.

      In the case of cellphones, assuming a following fare doesn't take it, and actually tells me that there's a phone back there, I just turn it off so it doesn't ring, and take it to the lost and found at our main office. Usually if anything gets left in the back, the next fare will take it.

      I've had a few people notify me of wallets in the back, which is always refreshing. I've only ever actually recovered two cellphones. I know more have been lost.

      --
      America - Home of the scapegoat, land of the Corporation
    18. Re:one question on this by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      It also moves from "theft" into "hate crime" at that point.

      There's no such thing as a hate crime committed by a minority or a hate crime in which the victim is a caucasian. Didn't you know that only whites are capable of hatred?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  23. Re:Stealing how? by TheSolomon · · Score: 1

    Good point, but since the phone was tied to that subscriber's account, it would at the very least be theft of service. Now if the phone is actually owned (contractually) by the service provider until the contract is fulfilled, it could possibly be theft of the device if you refuse to return it upon request.

  24. Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by is+as+us+Infinite · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, stealing someone's cell phone is very wrong. Obviously it needs to be returned to its rightful owner (ie. the person who bought it.) and it's strange that the thief hasn't just admitted it and taken the cell phone over to the owner.

    However, it looks to me like the young girl in the pictures may be somewhat innocent. Let's call them Mr. Army and Ms. Booty, just to make it easier (any similarity in naming between real life and the monikers is purely accidental... no really.) Mr. Army says, ostensibly, that a cabbie sold it to him. I doubt that's true. They also say that Mr. Army gave it to Ms. Booty as a present. That's probably what happened. And she got a SIM card and took some pictures and logged onto her AOL and now this guy takes her and shows her to the world as if she's a monster. The person who deserves the world's ire is the thief, Mr. Army.

    He really needs to own up to the situation. If he bought it from a cabbie, he had to know it was stolen. And if he stole it himself, well... the best thing he can do now is take the phone back and apologize. Anything else is just prolonging the inevitable, and possibly getting him a larger sentence, should Mr. Shamer choose to press charges.

    I feel like Ms. Booty is at least somewhat innocent. As it stands now, it would appear that she knows the phone is stolen, but obviously she's young, and judging by the fact that she has a child, probably none too bright, and easily swayed by Mr. Army's persuasion. This is a black mark on her life that will follow her around for many years to come. I'm sure she will have to endure some harsh judgement from her peers at school, and I'm not absolutely certain she deserves that.

    And now that Mr. Shamer has rejected offers for free webhosting 'gone over his current provider's bandwidth cap' and put up a donation link, it amounts to little more than a cry for cash.

    I feel sorry for everyone involved.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. . . . . . . .
    1. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by ryanov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When you hear "you stole my phone, give it back" and you don't do anything about it, you are guilty. Maybe not in the eyes of the law, but a kid in kindergarten knows that you can't take things that aren't yours.

    2. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by is+as+us+Infinite · · Score: 0

      Well... she could have just thought at first that the person telling her her phone was stolen was just trying to trick her. I think that's very plausable. But now that the truth of the matter is out in the open, she obviously knows the state of the phone's theft, and what she does now to rectify the situation is how she deserves to be judged by the internet community.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. . . . . . . .
    3. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by bferrell · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a dummy about GSM devices, but if she'd used her own SIM, to use the device it wouldn't have uploaded to the "wrong" account. Am I wrong here? If I'm not, then someone knew they were using minutes they didn't own.

    4. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Danse · · Score: 1

      I think we've seen from her myspace posts that she's not exactly a morally upstanding kid. She seems to think she's being cool by saying she's going to keep the phone and that they don't deserve to have it back. Not sure where she learned to act like this, but it's pretty messed up.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by harryk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You make the assumption that she bought her own SIM card, had that been the case, this story would never exist. Ms. Booty is using the original SIM card (or was anyway) that was in the 'recovered' phone. Regardless... Getting the phone originally was not on the up and up. Once the original owner (or friend) had identified to the current possesor that the phone had been ill-gotten, they should have made arrangements to return it, especially being that the timing was all together.

      It wasn't like she bought a brand new phone, and the first message she ever received was from some whack-job harrassing her.

      Mr Army and Ms Booty and Mr Tubs McGee brought this onto themselves... I say turn over everything to the cops, and allow it to run its course.

      harryk

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    6. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by The+Iconoclast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, but you forgot the Supreme Court prescident set in Finders v. Keepers.

      --
      Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
    7. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "And she got a SIM card and took some pictures and logged onto her AOL and now this guy takes her and shows her to the world as if she's a monster."
      She got the SIM card in the phone. Sorry but try this out. "Hey want to buy this phone? Yea it is legit don't worry about the pictures already on it. Oh and don't worry about paying for service I will throw that in for you." Yea right...
      Followed by
      Here is a cell phone babe. Don't worry about the pictures and the account...

      Nope this is theft.

      "This is a black mark on her life that will follow her around for many years to come. I'm sure she will have to endure some harsh judgement from her peers at school, and I'm not absolutely certain she deserves that."

      Why not. Shouldn't one have to bear judgement based on ones own actions? This isn't because of her gender, race, or even nationality. She decided to keep a phone that was stolen. She picked this path. I feel sorry for her child more than anything else.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by jmp_nyc · · Score: 2, Funny

      However, it looks to me like the young girl in the pictures may be somewhat innocent. She's apparently 16 years old and already a mother. Innocent is not necessarily the word I'd use to describe her. I'd give a pass on naive. I might even suggest that she missed out on having the best role models and guidance in her life. She's not innocent. An innocent 16 year old girl doesn't have a kid. An innocent 16 year old doesn't get involved with the sort of people who make death threats. -JMP

    9. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not call him Mr. Army. Let's call him Mr. Statutory Rapist or perhaps just Mr. Rapist for short.

    10. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by nephillim · · Score: 0

      ... If somebody makes a message say "you stole my phone give it back" pop up on my phone i would ignore it too if i thought that it was bought and paid for on the level. She may just think somebody is playing a joke on her. It might sound stupid... but you can't assume she ISN'T stupid

    11. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by ClobberedGuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's no such thing as "somewhat innocent". Reeks of "kind of pregnant".

    12. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, good cite. However, in that case it was also determined that Ms. Finder was required to present the object in question to the police as "abandoned property" and she had to wait the requisite 30 days with no claimants before it was legally hers.

    13. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by cyber0ne · · Score: 1

      Perhaps she was innocent at first, if your interpretation of the events is close to true. But when she learned that it was stolen property and did nothing about it, she became what's called an "accessory." If she's underage then she's subject to juvenile prosecution for the crime, but prosecution for a crime nonetheless.

      --
      http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
    14. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Liquorman · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I believe it was Finders v. Losers.

    15. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, it looks to me like the young girl in the pictures may be somewhat innocent.

      How the hell did you come to this conclusion? She's young, unwed with a kid and, (from the article) I was immediately told that my "white ass" didn't deserve it back. That she was not a "white bitch" (my friend who is a blonde white girl had pics on the phone this person had obviously seen) stupid enough to return a phone she found. she is also racist!

      I say fuck her! (figuratively, don't want AIDS) Throw this welfare racist nigger who thinks all laws are for everyone else in jail!

    16. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Yes, SIM cards are usually attached to a particular account/phone#. That's the nice thing of it since you can change your phone and retain all your stuff by re-using your SIM card with the new phone.

      Chances are Mr and Mrs Army didn't even bother getting a new SIM card.

    17. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      "When you hear "you stole my phone, give it back" and you don't do anything about it, you are guilty. Maybe not in the eyes of the law, but a kid in kindergarten knows that you can't take things that aren't yours."

      I have a kid in Kindergarten and you are right. I also have a kid in the two year old room at daycare and the property rules for two year olds is:

      MINE!!

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    18. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Sgt. Hutt and Ms. Booty

    19. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once that little cunt said "that white bitch doesn't deserve it back", she commited a hate crime, and is just as guilty.

    20. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1
      Somewhat innocent?

      "I immediately contacted the AOL name: Sashacristal8905 and requested that the Sidekick be returned. I was immediately told that my "white ass" didn't deserve it back. That she was not a "white bitch" (my friend who is a blonde white girl had pics on the phone this person had obviously seen) stupid enough to return a phone she found. After lots of threats, she said she and her boy would wait for me at:"

      As the first contact with these people results in a "ha ha I found your phone, what you gonna do about it" message from the girl, I can't really feel sorry for any embarrassment that may come of this...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    21. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by daspriest · · Score: 1

      It doesn't appear that Mr. Army realizes that the military has no problen with letting him serve a sentence in the civil courts, then sending him up on charges again on the military side. double jeopardy rules don't apply to military personal. So, once the civilian courts are done with him, the UCMJ will be thrown at him.

    22. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I would assume it was a joke if I saw it on my phone, too. But then again, I bought my phone from a Nextel store; I didn't find it in the back of a taxicab (or get it from someone who did). This girl knows the phone is stolen. I can't see any way for her to think she is in the right unless she is incredibly stupid (though she may be).

    23. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by mgblst · · Score: 1

      An innocent 16 year old doesn't get involved with the sort of people who make death threats.
       
      Interesting. How do you know someone you hang around with is going to make death threats? How do you screen the people that you hang around with? What sort of question do you ask them? Maybe you test them, by getting a stranger to put them in such a position, and see if they make death threats? It seems to me there is no reasonable way to measure your friends ability to make death threats, unless they are the type of person who is constantly making such threats.

      I agree with the rest of your statement, but the word ignorant comes to mind.

    24. Re:Shame, and Shaming the Shamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are absolutely right. Everything in this girl's life is probably stolen. Sneakers, baby stroller, phones, box of Huggies... all of it, stolen. So, that's not the weird thing in her life. The weird thing in her life is that one of her possessions is popping up messages that say "i'm stolen", and you are right, she should ignore it, it's too weird to contemplate.

      I can't wait till she lives in an RFID world and tries to walk he baby in huggies in the stroller with the sneakers into Niketown...

  25. Go ahead, knock yourself out. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As long as he never catches up to my favorite phone thieves of all time.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    1. Re:Go ahead, knock yourself out. by giorgiofr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WTF! That's just... cruel and stupid! What do they think they're doing? Besides, they'd better keep their eyes open and be on their toes because someone is going to beat the crap out of them sooner or later. For instance if I had been the guy with the white car, you can bet I'd have been fighting like hell: I'd have thought someone was attacking me from behind NAD stealing my phone at the same time. In such a situation I'd be pretty violent. Not being able to see well... a nice elbow in the face would have been a good choice!
      Stupid, really stupid.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:Go ahead, knock yourself out. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1

      Yeesh....and here I thought it was obviously staged. I mean, watch those again and ask yourself how they happened to spot these people, get in place, frame their shot, etc. Not to mention get away with it. Doh. The phone bashers were one of the earliest "viral" marketing schemes. The whole site was to promote some lame brit-pop song. Ow, my karma. =/

      --

      "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  26. Useful infos by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article actually says: if you need to steal a sidekick, please follow a good procedure not to be tracked!
    Very, very smart!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    1. Re:Useful infos by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      Ask Slashdot: What's the best procedure to steal a sidekick without getting traced?

  27. Re:useless with more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    censored and/or removed...no fun.

  28. Re:And the reason she didn't just cancel her servi by collectivescott · · Score: 1

    That's the first thing I thought of... you have to wait for the nude pics before you demand the sidekick back. Talk about leverage...

  29. cyber vigilantism, digital photos, and humiliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


    My SO had her laptop stolen last year, while on a trip home (to a country far from the US, where we currently live).

    Several months later, we hear from the police to say a) that the burglar is in prison awaiting trial and b) they have her laptop. Her sister picked it up, and discovered that it was full of home made pr0n, and we briefly thought of posting some of the highlights on the web. However, the burglar was sitting in prison (and remains there to this day), and we couldn't be bothered humiliating him further, and we had replaced the laptop and restored almost everything on it from the back-up. So I sent the system disks home, her sister did an erase/install, and then sold it on our behalf.

    However, this morning I came across this -- not exactly our story, since in this case the perp. has avoided legal trouble (thus far) and the ripoff was via an internet auction, rather than "breaking and entering", but it makes me wonder whether our burglar shouldn't also be the star of his own internet site. Too late now, though....

          http://www.amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/ [not completely work safe]

  30. AOL Users by Frightening · · Score: 5, Funny

    Honestly now, what do you expect? /*ducks

    1. Re:AOL Users by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

      you think all the AOL users on slashdot are going to throw things at you? what would they throw anyway, promo CDs?

    2. Re:AOL Users by Frightening · · Score: 1

      No, but they have some really NASTY smileys.

    3. Re:AOL Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you think all the AOL users on slashdot are going to throw things at you? what would they throw anyway, promo CDs?

      Dead wombats and rotten cabbage, maybe.

    4. Re:AOL Users by bky1701 · · Score: 0

      No, f00l, we throw the promos at THEM!

  31. Whoa by pkcs11 · · Score: 0

    Lots of baby-mamma-drama going on there.
    Format the page, please Evan.

    --
    "I have an odd craving to whisper about those few frightful hours in that ill-rumored and evilly shadowed seaport of dea
  32. Re:Stealing how? by monkeyfishgoat · · Score: 1
    If you leave an item behind somewhere and someone finds it, thats not exactly stealing.

    IANAL, but I believe (at least in the U.K.) this does count as theft. You need to take reasonable steps to return any property you find like this - e.g. hand it in at a police station.

  33. How to get free money by 955301 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Find some partners to "steal" your sidekick.
    2. Create a story about how they are ethically challenged.
    3. Crow about how you had to buy another one and these people are bad.
    4. Reluctantly put up a Paypal account to collect money for "incurred costs".
    5. wait for the naive techno fans to queue up to "help the cause".
    6. Profit!!!

    Assuming 2000 people give her $1 and 6 other people involved, now everybody has free sidekicks!

    Hey, that's better than most mid 90's internet startups!

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    1. Re:How to get free money by GreyyGuy · · Score: 1

      That has happened many times. I remember reading some girl posting about how her dog was set on fire by "some kids" and needed thousands of dollars for surgery and the like, so she put up a paypal account for donations. Within a day, people had disproven her story, and in three days she made up some story about it being a test of the kindness of strangers online or some crap like that and that she would refund everyone's money. But I didn't see any requests for donations on this site, though I didn't look in the forum.

    2. Re:How to get free money by 955301 · · Score: 1

      I think he just put the donations link up.

      Did you notice that the rest of his "site" is a skeleton with no content?

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    3. Re:How to get free money by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If you want to give money to strangers, go ahead. If you don't, don't. Caveat money-givers-to-people-they-don't-know-latinsoundi ngsuffixo.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:How to get free money by whimmel · · Score: 1

      While you're at it, why not create an email account to collect a new spam mailing list and post that address to the front page on Slashdot!

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    5. Re:How to get free money by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Yea...who doesn't have one of those??

  34. Can't live more than a day without a gadget by cecom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it amusing that she absolutely had to a buy a new sidekick within 24 hours. Can't live without it. No doubt that is good for the economy.

    Anyway, how is stealing a sidekick different from stealing anything else and why does it deserve a story ? The phones of several of my friends have been stolen of the years. I had my car CD player stolen a couple of years ago, but you don't see me bitching about it on Slashdot (oops, now you do).

    1. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I find it amusing that she absolutely had to a buy a new sidekick within 24 hours. Can't live without it. No doubt that is good for the economy.

      If that gadget were her only phone number (which is increasingly the case with people it seems), I can definitely understand.

    2. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by cecom · · Score: 1

      You are right.

    3. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by catch23 · · Score: 1

      I think the sidekick is actually a mobile phone with lots of extra features. So if you're the type of person that receives 3-4 important phone calls a day, I'd say it's important enough to require buying a new one the next day. I know several of my bosses that probably couldn't go a day (much less an hour!) without access to their blackberry. But a phone is probably a bit more important than a blackberry, since most of us who own a mobile phone, don't own landline phone numbers at home.

    4. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      I find it amusing that she absolutely had to a buy a new sidekick within 24 hours. Can't live without it. No doubt that is good for the economy.

      I find it amusing that people are able to act smugly when they're dead wrong.

      ~D

    5. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by infochuck · · Score: 1

      I had my car CD player stolen a couple of years ago, but you don't see me bitching about it on Slashdot (oops, now you do).

      That's because your CD player didn't start sending you pictures of the thieves. If it had, it would have been news.

    6. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by cecom · · Score: 0

      While I agree completely, my thoughts were somewhere along the lines of:
      It is ridiculous to complain when things gets stolen and you must buy them again. Yes, things get stolen, even phones - that is life, alas. Here is an example: how would you react if I said:

      "My BMW 765 was stolen :-( After a day of waiting I had to go to the dealership and spend over $100,000 on a new one!"

      But the bigger point is, why the f*ck is this a story and why are we discussing it ?

    7. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by cecom · · Score: 1

      Oh, so Slashdot is America's dumbest criminals now ? :-)

    8. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Ask people who have a BlackBerry if they can live without it for a day. My guess is that many users would have their BlackBerry replaced the same day they lost it.

    9. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by Helter · · Score: 1

      Maybe amusing, but it's a reality. My cellphone is my primary business number, when it breaks (which happens) my business is basically shut down.
      I really can't have that, even for 24 hours, so I keep an operational backup phone to use when my smartphone goes dead.

    10. Re:Can't live more than a day without a gadget by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      But the bigger point is, why the f*ck is this a story and why are we discussing it ?

      It sounds like you agree with the other reasons for the existance of this story, so to address this last point I think this is a story because the guy took a technological method to solve his problems, managed to get help from people all over the world (or maybe just the country) to do his detective work.

      I think that's pretty amazing. If you lost your BMW 765, posted to a website and within two days had people posting posting the thief's website and personal information, I think that would be pretty damn amazing. Sort of a demonstration of what technology can do for collaboration. Of course the first thing he had to do appeal to peoples' sense of 'goodness', 'honor', or 'justice'. The fact that so many people responded shows there are still people who care about that stuff.
  35. IT BURNS! by dwalsh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out the MySpace account they found:

    http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=us er.viewprofile&friendID=78722066

    The goggles they do nothing etc. Worst site I have seen in a while.

    More seriously, it erodes your belief in the basic goodness of people, and hardens your attitude to certain classes of people, when you see such poor specimens of human beings as these.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
    1. Re:IT BURNS! by pedalman · · Score: 1

      MY EYES! MY EYES! OW!

      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    2. Re:IT BURNS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Haven't seen a website this bad since my first at geocities. And I wrote it in html, back in the 90's.

    3. Re:IT BURNS! by tehlinux · · Score: 1

      How can I be in the extended network when I don't even have a myspace?

      --
      Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    4. Re:IT BURNS! by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      I hope that this MySpace account is blowing up with messages. A subject line of "Give Back the SIDEKICK!" would be sufficient. I've done my part.

    5. Re:IT BURNS! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      That site... People have been taken out and shot for less.
      And then there are still people who believe eugenetics is a bad thing. If it prevents sites like that one, I'd be happy to live in a world where every boy is identical to VERY_POPULAR_GUY and every girl looks just like VERY_POPULAR_GIRL.

  36. In Capitalist America, thieves sue YOU! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny

    FTA: I also don't condone uploading videos and pics onto websites like youtube.com and sending the links to me. This is a very bad thing to do. Naughty naughty....Buttttttttttttttttt since youtube is a public website I will post any video that is on there....of course if there was a issue with the legality of the video, then that would be youtube's responsibility to remove.

    Uh... so you're not sure if the stuff people are sending you is legal, but you're posting it anyway?

    That's definitely not legal in the US, and even in Sweden it could cause you a lot of trouble. Just ask these guys.

    Some people just don't know when to quit while they're ahead.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:In Capitalist America, thieves sue YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misunderstand.... Compare...

      Person makes video of alleged phone stealing parties. Uploads to YouTube. Links are posted. Clearly stated against this sort of this: "I also don't condone uploading videos and pics onto websites like youtube.com and sending the links to me. This is a very bad thing to do. Naughty naughty."

      The alleged phone stealing parties have /already/ uploaded their own content to YouTube. Other people find it. Links are posted. Clearly stated not my problem to this kind of thing: "Buttttttttttttttttt since youtube is a public website I will post any video that is on there....of course if there was a issue with the legality of the video, then that would be youtube's responsibility to remove."

      Looks fine to me!

  37. Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by NYTrojan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been following this since the day it happened (not long ago anyway) and I am beginning to suspect that this may be a fake, and even if it isn't, Boy what a great con idea.

    Hear me out

    The guy continually writes that he's not looking for fame and fortune, but goes on to list all the people who have pointed this out and what news outlets are looking to interview him. Bemoans the fact that he isn't on TV yet, and says he's not looking for fame in the same breath. Hmmm...

    He then goes on to state over and over that he's not looking for money. That people suggested putting up a donation link, but he won't do it.... yet he doesn't hesitate to supply information regarding what everything costs over and over. Now, finally, that the number of people viewing has grown large enough he springs the 'Okay, you can donate, but only if you can afford it.'

    Maybe I'm too cynical, but what's to stop someone living in corona (maybe it's the girl in the pics!) from pulling something like this? Set up a few phony myspace accounts and boom, good to go. You can make thousands off of the internet donation effect... why not?

    1. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's also a tip-off that the guy makes his own porn. Who knows, maybe the girl will show up on his site later...

      Oh, wait

    2. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by noidentity · · Score: 1

      After a nice Slashdotting and all the other visitors, the cost of replacing his Sidekick will be nothing compared to bandwidth costs.

    3. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by catch23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well if it is that girl who is doing it for fame and fortune... then this: video really doesn't help. Do you really think the girl in that video has the intelligence to go about doing all of this? Sure, they could be acting... but somehow, I doubt that. Plus, it's in NYC, where millions of people live and could easily drive by and verify for themselves.

      Cynical perhaps... Maybe NASA never did land on the moon... it was all directed by Spielberg!

    4. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by niko9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might be right. From his main page: http://www.evanwashere.com/about.html


        I was born in 1975 in Manhattan and raised in Greenwich, CT. I left home at the early age of 14 and moved to NY. I lived in Brooklyn, Queens, Switzerland, England, and Israel...though not in that particular order. At the age of 19-20 I moved to Battery Park City in Manhattan and started working in Wall St. I lived there for the next 7 years designing the market data and trading technologies for places like CIBC Oppenheimer, Bankers Trust, and on the floor of the American Stock Exchange.

      After surviving 9-11, I wandered about a bit trying to find myself. On Jan 25th of this year, I moved to Miami, FL. I still go back to NYC about twice a month for business and to visit friends.

      Questions and Answers:

      Question: Why do you have this website? Are you a narcissist?

      Answer: Yes, I am actually. Also, a lot of my friends always want copies of the pics I take. This website makes it easy for them to grab them.

      Question: What do you do for a living? Are you working now?

        Answer: Well, for the last decade I have worked in Wall St designing and supporting technology on trading floors. As of right now, I am co starting a technology consulting firm.

      Question: What's with all these girls? Did you date all of them?

        Answer: Get your mind out of the gutter. I am a friendly guy and was able to meet a lot of great people. I will not respond to people who ask me who I dated and who I haven't. That's between me and the girls.

      Question: Why do you have a whole section dedicated to parties?

        Answer: In the past, I was a party boy. I would go club hopping all weekend, as well as throwing my own parties. I would go from renting the penthouse to renting the entire top floor of a hotel in Manhattan. These pics are just the ones where I actually had 2-3 min to take pictures.

      Question: Are you dating anyone now?

        Answer: Why? You interested?

      Question: What's with the donation page?

        Answer: Camera's, web hosting, parties, etc don't come cheap. I have no shame in my game and am willing to accept any and all offers. I have had people in the past donate for parties. Well, now you too can have that honor and privilege.

      Question: Can I meet any of these girls?

        Answer: What do I look like? A cyber pimp? Well, if you think you're all that, post a comment under the girl of your dream's picture with your e-mail address and sit by your PC and wait. You might just get lucky.

      Question: What's with the private section? Can I get in there?

        Answer: Wow. You make no donations, yet you want to see my private pics. Contact me and we'll see.

      Question: I can't think of any more questions right now. Can I e-mail or IM you?

        Answer: Sure. Go to the "contact" page on the top menu. I always respond back.


      What _ a _ player.

    5. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by NYTrojan · · Score: 1

      yes, people have driven by and as stated in one of his updates "The address was a fake." He DOES have a story saying that someone came by with a video camera (because she lived close to the fake address) and got a load from the building super...

      The guy just seems to protest too much to me.

    6. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by zifferent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt it. It's not the kind of con that a 16 year old (or even most 60 year olds) could pull off. If the girl was an unwilling participant without her knowlege, e.g. someone else is using her to setup a con, she and everyone else associated with this would have been incredulous from day/hour 1.

      The details are too perfect. Like the conflicting stories, multiple myspace accounts some of which have been deactivated. Unless a person cons for a living they wouldn't think of human nature stuff like that. Some of the T-Mobile stuff jibes, too. Too many good details.

      It seems easy to do now that it's been done, but it wouldn't have been easy to setup and coordinate as spontaneously as it has happened.

      Besides, I don't doubt he's out of bandwidth what with the combined Digg/Slashdot effect, that kind of stuff can get expensive real quick, and he probably underestimated how expensive.

      --
      cat sig > /dev/null
    7. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by NYTrojan · · Score: 1

      The thing is, all the conflicting stories come from the same place... You get one guy's perspective. And I don't have any problem believing that somebody would set up multiple myspace accounts after some of these 'donate to the victims' stories out there ended up with people getting 6 digit donations. The sooner they are deactivated, the less time they are up for people to pick apart. Someone put together a fake Jimmy Clausen (Football player committed to Notre Dame) myspace page not long ago in an (obvious) attempt to bring bad press on the kid. I've read a number of 'internet storys' where they were told ILoveBees style through multiple fake myspace, blogger, and livejournal accounts. I don't see how this is any different.

      How do you know the girl is 16? She definitely looks young but you only have this guy's word for it. If it's not her, maybe her family, or boyfriend?

      I'm not saying that this is what happened, just saying that it appears suspicious.

    8. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by corbettw · · Score: 1

      What's more, if you go to http://www.evanwashere.com/resume/stats.html (the Stats link), it's a 404 page that looks like a typical domain squatting page. Lots and lots of links, plus a search function. Something doesn't smell right here.

      And how does a 19 year old design "the market data and trading technologies for places like CIBC Oppenheimer, Bankers Trust, and on the floor of the American Stock Exchange"???

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    9. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by GatorMan · · Score: 1

      At first I read your post and wanted to hit you with something solid and blunt. But you offer a second perspective I had only briefly considered then waved-off. Now that I've read his main page (evanwashere.com) I'm starting to favor your view. This looks like a hoax. Same as helpwinmybet.com. Ugh.

    10. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by Unequivocal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I looked up the site on internic and it appears this person is real and lives in Connecticut. I figure not everyone knows how to look things up on Internic (even on slashdot), so I'm deleting personally identifying information.

      evanwashere.com:
      Evan [last name removed]
      68 [Street removed] Hill Rd
      [city removed], CT [zip removed]
      +1.917[number removed]
      [email removed]

      I wondered also if this was legitimate but it seems like a lot of effort and risk to take for a few donations. I currently believe it's legitimate - the Internic info has the ring of truth..

    11. Re:Beginning to wonder if this is a fake by zifferent · · Score: 1

      Nah that's most likely just his ISP's default.

      It's not like Evan is an HTML wiz.

      --
      cat sig > /dev/null
  38. Laptop stolen and recoved thanks to AIM by keldog42 · · Score: 0

    I had my laptop stolen last year. It was sold to someone who never took AIM off and it was set to login on startup. A few court orders later, we (the cops) took the IP address of the user and got the phisical address from the ISP. They recovered my laptop but botched up and didn't make any arrests or get my other items back. They wouldn't even have done that if I hadn't layed it out for thenm step by step. Thanks Lexington, KY police!

  39. Why not just track the IMEI? by gustaffo · · Score: 1

    Since the SK is a GSM device it'll have an International Mobile Equipment ID (IMEI). This is different than your IMSI (Intl Mobile Subscriber ID), in that the IMSI is tied to a subscriber and account, and the IMEI is tied to a device. Report the device stolen (your carrier will have the device IMEI if you bought it from them). As soon as someone slips their own SIM into the device, or tries to use your SIM, the carrier can track down many things about the user. In the case of their own SIM, they will know who the user is that is associated with said SIM. If the person is using your SIM, they can still track the user based on calls (after all, it is your account you can authorize them to track this info) as well as distance and angle (which directional antenna). Additionally, there is an international registry of stolen IMEI's, so if someone takes your device to another country, chances are it won't work if it's on that list.

    1. Re:Why not just track the IMEI? by LoonyMike · · Score: 0
      Yes, the carrier can indeed easily track the device. The question is - does it WANT to?

      AFAIK, these stolen/unlocked/... IMEI lists aren't honoured amongst competing carriers. If carrier C1 sells a network-locked phone, the customer unlocks it and starts using it with carrier C2, C1 can kindly ask C2 not to allow that device on its network, but I doubt that C2 will comply.

      Now, if the police asked Cx to track the usage of the IMEI on their networks, that's a different story. But I don't know what it takes for the police to handle the case.

    2. Re:Why not just track the IMEI? by gustaffo · · Score: 1

      No - they do honor it. At least the one that pays me does (and tmobile being a large eu carrier, I would be really surprised if they don't). The stolen IMEI list is not for banning your customers that have unlocked devices, it's only to be used in the event that a device is stolen. After all, if carriers banned all unlocked devices, the list would get huge, and the bigger the list the more resources the carrier needs to scan the list each time a device registers on the network. I'm not sure how useful an unlocked SK would be on a network that doesn't support all the little things on the back end that makes the SK useful - and in the US that pretty much means tmobile. The owner of the device in question should ask T-Mobile to ban it's IMEI. That will effectively (not literally) brick the device and end the controversy.

  40. Ya beat me to it by NYTrojan · · Score: 1

    Glad to see I'm not the only one who might be a little too cynical

    I smell a phony

    1. Re:Ya beat me to it by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Ha ha. You said "phony" in an article about PHONES!!!!111!!

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  41. Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by NXIL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the army soldier WarriorPena84@aol.com did in fact write and send this, he is going to be attending the UCMJ School of Hard Knocks, and that is going to suck:

    "listen you dumb mother fucker my sister bought that phone from some cab driver so what the fuck do you want . shes not going to return it if she bought it, and am military police so dont give me that bullshit about you going to the cops over a lost phone the nypd has better things to do then to worry about your friend losing her phone. you better stop harrasing my sister or you'll have to deal with me and you dont want that"

    Shows a lack of impulse control, immaturity, and absence of sound judgement: given the mutlple recent international incidents our military has been involved in, I truly hope they take away his weapon privileges, and soon.

    I am not a JAG, but, there are about a dozen things they can charge him with there, from 'conduct unbecoming', to making a threat, conspiracy, etc. Not good.

    They should turn him over to the grammar and spelling Nazis too....

    1. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by Silverstrike · · Score: 1

      I'm not in the military, but doesn't "conduct unbecoming" finish with "of an officer"?

      Somehow, I don't think he's officer material.

    2. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by Arild+Fines · · Score: 1

      > They should turn him over to the grammar and spelling Nazis too....

      "Grammar unbecoming"?

    3. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Doesn't matter. Check out the UCMJ 934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE
      Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.


      Also check out Article 121, 127, and 128, under all of which he can be charged.
      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am not a JAG, ... ... grammar and spelling Nazis ...

      I shall heretofore cease my references to "$BEHAVIOR Nazis." From this day forth, I shall only refer to "$BEHAVIOR JAGs."

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    5. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >I'm not in the military, but doesn't "conduct unbecoming" finish with "of an officer"?

      In the movies, yes. In real life, you don't want to be charged with a petty crime while on active duty.
      Things like assaulting a civilian, theft of property, or drug posession, are wisely avoided.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know if it's his grammar or not, but that old hag in the pictures is definitely unbecoming!

    7. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by cyber0ne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on that particular chain of command, really. I've seen CO's not do a damn thing if they figure it won't come back to bite them. The guy definitely doesn't sound like an officer, so a wise move above and beyond reporting the incident(s) to his CO would be a few well-placed phone calls to his First Sergeant and Sergeant Major (this is all if you can find out what unit he's in, of course) to help get the ball rolling.

      One of my chaplains once said in a new soldier orientation: "In a world of good things and bad things, if the battalion Sergeant Major has to talk to your NCO about you, that is a very bad thing."

      --
      http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
    8. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I shall heretofore cease my references to "$BEHAVIOR Nazis." From this day forth, I shall only refer to "$BEHAVIOR JAGs."
      I think you mean hereafter, not heretofore.
    9. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Weeeeel... He's supposedly an MP.

      I also received an email from someone who told me military guy's full name and that he gradated on april 27 2006 in D company 795 1st platoon warriors (they seem to have graduated together).

      From a little digging I came up with this: http://www.wood.army.mil/USAMPS/14thMPBde/795thMPB n/default.htm

      And the unit (and the commander I suppose) contact info is here: http://www.wood.army.mil/USAMPS/14thMPBde/795thMPB n/NewArrival.htm

      Since he supposedly graduated a month and a half ago he may be on his first leave and still under the command of wood.army.mil - so contacting them should be sufficient. I'm not american and don't feel like calling long distance overseas, but it seems obvious that he shouldn't carry a rifle or have MP authority.
    10. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      By the way, his name is Jose Herrera, and per http://groups.google.com/group/stolensidekick , his contact info is

      Jose Herrera
      10820 37th Dr
      Corona, NY 11368-2033
      (718) 478-4632

      Feel free to report him.

    11. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by bulldogzerofive · · Score: 0

      Come on dude he is just a private fresh out of basic training. They are brash and excitable (like you want killers to be) and he made a mistake, probably while home on leave before even reporting to his first unit. That first unit probably has problems with people who use drugs, beat their wives, drive drunk, etc etc. The CO is not going to give two shits.

    12. Re:Army dude is toast if he is reported to his CO by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      Discrediting the Army, Receiving Stolen Goods, Theft, Assault (threats are assault, carrying them out is battery), conspiracy to defraud, etc. etc.
      He's toast, if he's really a soldier (I was one for 13 years).

  42. Reading 101? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the crime here? Nobody stole anything, the girl FOUND the sidekick in a taxi. Last time i checked finding something that somebody else lost isn't a crime.

    1. Re:Reading 101? by Danse · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not returning something when you know it doesn't belong to you, and additionally using the phone service that someone else paid for is theft. If I find a bike laying in the street and I pick it up and walk off with it, even though there's a kid yelling and chasing me and saying that it's his and he just left it there for a minute, then yeah, I just stole his bike.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:Reading 101? by xalres · · Score: 1

      Whether she found it or bought it, she had to have known that the phone didn't belong to her. The fact that she refuses to return it with the knowledge that it isn't hers makes it posession of stolen property, which is a felony. You don't have to actively run up to someone and grab something from them in order for it to be considered stolen.

      --
      If whales learn how to use weapons we're all screwed!
    3. Re:Reading 101? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >The fact that she refuses to return it with the knowledge that it isn't hers makes it posession of stolen property, which is a felony.

      The fact that she has expressed a racially motivated reason for not returning it makes it a hate crime as well. Conceivably, she could do life without parole for this.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Reading 101? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually went and looked at the New York penal code for a situation like this.

      http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/NewYork/ny3( a)(1)-.htm

      It appears that if the person responsible bought the Sidekick and found out it was stolen, they are guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, which is a class A misdemeanor. By withholding the Sidekick and using it for unlawful telephone access, they could be found guilty of larceny in the fourth degree, which is a class E felony.

    5. Re:Reading 101? by jythie · · Score: 1

      Heh. Actually, that is an interesting idea. If the races were reversed, this might actually be an issue.

    6. Re:Reading 101? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >Heh. Actually, that is an interesting idea. If the races were reversed, this might actually be an issue.

      Oops! Are you suggesting that hate crime laws only protect people of certain races?

      If that were the case, they could never stand up to the doctrine of "equal protection", which is pretty much the whole motivation for such laws.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  43. Time for revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are u kidding, they're not giving your sidekick back after it's been this long, it's just plain time to get some sweet revenge, they deserve it!

    1. get some super glue
    2. late at nite super glue their car's:
                a. windshield wipers
                b. tire air holes
                c. door locks
                d. window seals
                e. and draw a little smiley face on their windshield where they normally would look out while driving

    done deal, what u lost in device, u gained in pleasure.

    1. Re:Time for revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lolol me 2. Er, no. Come on, please, you're on Slashdot.

  44. Bring it on Sista! by layer3switch · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I was immediately told that my white ass didn't deserve it back."

    OH! You De-dnt! (two snaps and a circle) You and your boi-frieeeend with rough neck gangsta wannabe outfit like "oh i'm finally out of my grandma's basement" with his raggidity looking pimp squad can kiss my black ass of sweetness.

    Bring it oun, bitch!!11!1! I'll squash you whore like a spanish fly and sting your stank whore ass like Queen bee.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  45. New trend? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems like a new trend to get things like this "public" in order to get back to the offenders, using the open and more and more community-like nature of the internet.

    I wouldn't be surpriced if in a while these you-are-a-criminal-bitch! webpages start popping up plentyful as people seem to feel they "can do something" and hunting the offenders down, having direct result as it exposes them in their own social network (blog/myspace/...) having a bigger impact (a "most in my direct environment and social network dissaproved" vs. "some stupid cop 'caught me'") or perhaps, for some, it's way to be able to mock someone. It's fascinating to see it resembling an old custom where criminals were publically humiliated and displayed on the townsquare for everyone to enjoy.


    The guy with the laptop distressed me and I felt relief him getting exposed in his questionable activities. It really looked like the guy explicitely intended to sell some broken laptop and profit off of it. Judging from the pictures though, this girl seems to be rather young and lower class, just wanting to get in on the whole technology gadgets-train and saw an opportunity. I don't approve of it, and think she just should've given the sideKick back without going all racist and intimidating over it. But it seems less of a threat. Although, it appeared she felt "untouchable" by the way she communicated back. I suppose being critisized by a wold-audience personally adressed to you will do more then a criminal record which means in certain circles how "tough" and "gansta" you are.

    I do wonder what the long term damage will be as many companies track your name on the internet before hiring...

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  46. Re:cyber vigilantism, digital photos, and humiliat by rtconner · · Score: 1

    this whole story was linked to on the front page a few days ago.

    .. unless I'm getting my news websites mixed up.. :P

    --
    023AD01("Child", "Evil");
  47. Re:Stealing how? by HardCase · · Score: 1

    Oh boy, another /. lawyer.

    For once common sense and the law align. The phone is stolen. And the person who took it is still a dick.

    -h-

  48. Re:Stealing how? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sorry you left your $40,000 Mercedes in the parking lot outside. You must be dumb for abandoning it like that. LOL.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  49. Re:Today in the news... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and started a killing rampage to feed his nine children.

    Did he get enough meat off those starving Iraquis to feed his nine kids? Or is this about some kind of bounty paid for dead Iraquis? Let us all know, as many here are looking for unique investment opportunities like these.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  50. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    If you RTFA, you'd see that there are no ads and that there is no PayPal link, and that the author claims that he doesn't want to set one up.

    It would appear that the author is not motivated by money, at least not yet.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by 955301 · · Score: 2, Informative

      look again, notice the paypal link, then come back and apologize. She just emailed me to say most of the donations are under $1 and the bandwidth/loss of work is what she is taking donations for.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by 955301 · · Score: 1

      Also, I just sent her back access to a google spreadsheet to track costs of lossed time, legal fees, hardware, bandwidth, etc. Hopefully she will use it along with something indicating how much money she's collected so her effort keeps it's integrity.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 3, Funny

      That just gave me a wonderful idea for my Slashdot sig. I should be accepting PayPal donations for all the lost work /. has resulted in.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by echucker · · Score: 1

      Psst.... "Evan" is a he.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by 955301 · · Score: 1

      yeah, but the girl who lost the phone isn't a he.
      "When my friend realized that she had left the Sidekick in the taxi she asked me to immediately send a message to the phone saying that we would give a reward for the phone. "

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    6. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by deesine · · Score: 1
      That's a brilliant idea! I'm also very skeptical and placed a post on the forum enviting Evan to post a donations counter, an hourly/daily report, or at least $ to date.

      One of the admins, Pandemic, reported getting 20,000+ unique visitors as of 6/8/06 7pm PST. You had estimated 2,000, putting the response at 10%. That's a very reasonable estimate. It could easily be double or triple that. Plus, how much is a ripe list of 20,000 email addresses worth these days?

      It does seem like an awful lot of work to go through for only about 1 weeks salary. Plus, this kinda scam can only work once.

      --
      damaged by dogma
  51. Re:Stealing how? by damian+cosmas · · Score: 2, Informative

    IANAL, but the law makes a distinction between lost, mislaid, and abandoned property, which happens to have a convenient wikipedia entry. Stuff like this is obviously difficult to enforce, but generally you can only walk off with something you find if it's readily apparent that its owner had no intention of ever recovering it. Car pushed into river = abandoned. Phone left in taxi = not abandoned.

  52. Re:Stealing how? by ryanov · · Score: 1

    I suppose it has never happened to you? I've left my laptop in a restaurant more than once... have a drink or two and just have other things on your mind -- it can happen if you aren't careful. That's no reason to fuck someone over. Some morality on your part.

  53. Re:Stealing how? by snark42 · · Score: 1

    Regardless of how they got a hold of the phone, they're now in possession of stolen goods and should return it, or face possible criminal charges. Otherwise you can just claim you "found" anything you stole and it would be ok...

  54. Re:Today in the news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if the Iraq invasion or electing that tyrant of yours was less stupid than forgetting a cell phone.

  55. Re:Stealing how? by alfs+boner · · Score: 2
    If you are a freaking idiot and leave your items somewhere carelessly, your just a moron

    I'm rather surprised that you managed to turn a computer on.

    --
    Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
  56. At least there's some good new for humanity... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1
    From the MySpace page of the person who found the Sidekick:

    Children: I don't want kids
    Thank goodness. Let's hope it stays that way
    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    1. Re:At least there's some good new for humanity... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      that doesn't mean they don't have any.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:At least there's some good new for humanity... by Chambers81 · · Score: 1

      website says that she has a kid or something. at least i remember reading that yesterday.

  57. Mel Gibson loses his Sidekick.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The whole world now knows... my sidekick was kidnapped, for ransom, three days ago. This is a recent photograph of it. Sidekick, if you're watching, we love you. And this... well, this is what waits for the man that took him. This is your ransom. Two million dollars in unmarked bills, just like you wanted. But this is as close as you'll ever get to it. You'll never see one dollar of this money, because no ransom will ever be paid for my sidekick. Not one dime, not one penny. Instead, I'm offering this money as a reward on your head. Dead or alive, it doesn't matter. So congratulations, you've just become a two million dollar lottery ticket... except the odds are much, much better. Do you know anyone that wouldn't turn you in for two million dollars? I don't think you do. I doubt it. So wherever you go and whatever you do, this money will be tracking you down for all time. And to ensure that it does, to keep interest alive, I'm running a full-page ad in every major newspaper every Sunday... for as long as it takes. But... and this is your last chance... you return my sidekick, working, with batteries, I'll withdraw the bounty. With any luck you can simply disappear. Understand... you will never see this money. Not one dollar. So you still have a chance to do the right thing. If you don't, well, then, God be with you, because nobody else on this Earth will be."

    TFOAE

  58. Re:And the reason she didn't just cancel her servi by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    So would you say they are non-nude? 'Cause that's cool too.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  59. Re:Stealing how? by Pope · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because you're perfect and have never done anything wrong or by accident. Tell it to the monkeys, pal.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  60. Re:Stealing how? by MaverickUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Well geeze officer, what do you mean murder? I mean, they didn't move out of the way of my bullet, they saw me with the gun and I told them I was gonna shoot. How can it be my fault, they got what they deserved by not dodging."

    If the above story actually happened, you could start your career as an amateur lawyer.

  61. Theives taking photos of themselves! by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some thieves stole a camera, among other things, and spent the rest of the night taking pictures of themselves
    committing other crimes.

    One of them was caught a few days later, with my camera. The police returned my camera, and when I checked the memory card, I found that it contained a number of pictures of the two guys who had taken pictures of each other, breaking into cars and houses, all very clear and recognizable. It was obvious that the police had not inspected the camera memory.

    The guy that was caught, had tried to claim that the camera was his, and when they pressed him with the evidence they had, he eventually admitted to one car break-in, and insisted he was alone. The date-stamped images on my camera told a different story. It was actually very satisfying to show this stuff to the detective. But, he made it clear to me that thieves doing stupid things is not at all unusual.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  62. Probably a stupid question, but it's bothering me. by Kaemaril · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't posting these pictures without permission strictly speaking a copyright violation? I mean, they're not his photos ...

    Although fair use, I guess, could be argued, and damages (if any) would be minimal. Plus, of course, the guy could cross-sue with all sorts of neat stuff ...

    But even so, technically ... isn't this arguably a violation?

  63. Re:Stealing how? by CptTripps · · Score: 1

    He CLEARLY states that it was his BLONDE friend... ...case closed.

    --


    My .sig can beat up your honor student.
  64. Re:cyber vigilantism, digital photos, and humiliat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of a story where a former IT guy stole a laptop. Of course the company wasn't aware of it until a few years later...when it showed up as evidence. Turns out this IT guy was into child porn and landed himself in court.

  65. Re:Stealing how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next time your phone or wallet slips out of your pocket while you're in a car (that never happens! duh!)...I'm gonna come over to your house and beat the shit outta you for being such a goddamned moron. You effing idiot you. You deserve to be slapped in the face with a slightly wet open palm.

  66. Where's the service provider in all this? by Moofie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why doesn't the vendor have some authentication and location system for phones that are reported stolen? It's not like T-Mobile doesn't know exactly where the device is located.

    Oh wait...this way they get to sell another phone. Question answered.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  67. Re:Stealing how? by blugu64 · · Score: 1

    ahh who needs a cheap Mercedes anyway

    --
    "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
  68. You're kidding right? (was:Time for revenge) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err, you want to travel in the neighborhood they live in, AFTER DARK? You sir, are brave indeed.

  69. Re:Stealing how? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    If I drop a dollar on the side walk and then come back an hour later and its gone, I don't consider it stolen. I consider the dollar lost.

  70. Equally racist? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    "judging from the pictures though, this girl seems to be rather young and lower class, "
    They young part I will give you but she seems old enough to be a parent.
    Are you saying that because of her class and or race she isn't capable of knowing right from wrong?
    If it was a white kid in the burbs would you judge them by a higher standard?
    This person has a stolen phone. They know it is stolen. They don't need it for survival or to feed their family. They have enough resources for a computer and Internet access.
    Maybe the world needs to see that being a thief doesn't pay. Just think how different the story would have been if they had just returned it. They would have gotten a reward and could consider themselves honest moral people. Now the would sees them as stupid dishonest thieves and that will follow them for a long time to come.

      A great man once said, "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
    Let these people be judged by the content of their character.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Equally racist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A great man once said, "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

      Immediately followed up with 'unless juding them by the color of their skin allows them to move to the front of the line, get the scholarship or college berth, or be awared the job, contract or promotion without regard to merit or performance. In that case, you must pass laws demanding that they be judged by the color of their skin.'

    2. Re:Equally racist? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Hard to say since Martian Luther King Jr. was shot and killed before any "affirmative action" laws where past.
      I willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in this case.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  71. Why not just locate the phone electronically? by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    There are a number of companies that, for a small fee, will work with the provider and give you a by-the-second trace of the phone's physical location as triangulated by the cellular network. You can pinpoint the location of the phone within a dozen meters or so.

    Heck, T-Mobile might do it for you (or the police) for free if you asked nicely.

    1. Re:Why not just locate the phone electronically? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      From what I know, most modern cellular phones have a rudimentary built in GPS, to aid in directing emergency services when 911 is dialed. You can disable it if you want, but judging from the thieves' behavior, I doubt they have the intelligence to do so.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  72. Re:Looking at the pics... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    QUICK EVERYONE!!! COME AND LOOK AT THE RACIST!!!

    Go one! Throw it a peanut! But don't get too close to the bars or it might reach into it's bottom & throw poo at you!

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  73. Re:Today in the news... by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 1

    Wow deep deep post there, really pulled at my heart strings...

    Little news flash for you sparky, when people take your things that's illegal. I suppose you won't mind if I steal your car because you can just buy another one, or get a bus pass, or ride a fecking bike.

    Remove head from ass then post jackass...

    --
    I Like Pie...
  74. Re:Stealing how? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kind of like a woman is dumb enough to dress in a short skirt and be out at night and she is raped she got what she deserved?

    Sorry but have a phone fall out of your purse or your pocket is an accident. Keeping one that you know isn't yours is theft.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  75. Re:Probably a stupid question, but it's bothering by Kaemaril · · Score: 1

    Um ... I see an offtopic mod on this comment. WTH? Offtopic?

    A question about the legality of pictures on a revenge site is offtopic ... how exactly?

  76. Something doesn't make sense... by CaptainTux · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Perhaps I'm missing something here but something in this article doesn't make sense. Supposedly, the person left their sidekick in a taxi and eventually had to go and buy a new one. Then, when they put their SIM card in, they noticed the person was signed in to AIM and had taken pictures of themselves. This is where I have some questions: 1: AIM signins are saved on the phone signing in. Signing in from another phone would not tell you someone was logged into AIM under another name because there would be no signin data on the new phone and new SIM card. 2: Pictures are saved on the SIM card or on the phone on which they are taken. They would not be available on the new phone and new SIM card. Unless I'm missing something here, this story sounds fishy.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    1. Re:Something doesn't make sense... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      You are missing something.
      RTFA.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Something doesn't make sense... by CaptainTux · · Score: 1

      I have RTFA. It doesn't make sense. That isn't how the SK works. Call T-Mobile and ask.

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    3. Re:Something doesn't make sense... by gleffler · · Score: 1

      You don't know how Sidekicks work.

      RTFA.

    4. Re:Something doesn't make sense... by funwithBSD · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then read it again. It is not the SK card, it is the T-Mobile remote respository that is tied to the account.

      "Some people are asking how we have their pics and AOL name. The way a Sidekick works, is that when you use it, all the data on it get's uploaded automatically to the T-Mobile server. So pictures you have taken, AOL names and passwords u have used, etc are all on the server. So when my friend turned on her new Sidekick and put her new SIM card in, all the data downloaded on to her phone. And that's how we have everything. "

      So there, I read the article for and explained it you. Now delete your slashdot account, you got not cred as a technologist, and should'nt use anything more advanced than a crayon.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    5. Re:Something doesn't make sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a LONGTIME Sidekick/Hiptop user (2+ years), I can safely tell you that this is *EXACTLY* how they work. http://hiptop.com/

    6. Re:Something doesn't make sense... by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should ask someone who knows a bit more about technology than you do. I think that Paris Hilton may be able to tell you a few things about how T-Mobile operates.

  77. Re:Probably a stupid question, but it's bothering by Wubby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's an interesting legal question. If you create a work with someone elses stolen property, who owns the work. If you steal my camera (and film) and take a picture, do you get to keep the pictures, or are they also mine when/if I get the camera back.

    To extend that out, does a music recording made with a stolen guitar become the players, or the owners?

    In this case, though, since the photos are uploaded as part of a service (T-Mobile) and that service belongs to the legal owner, I would think the EULA and TOS of T-Mobile would apply. I wonder if those would shed a better light on it.

    Or it may be even easier to answer. The service copies the works to anywhere the legal user of the service wants, so in effect, the one who took the pictures has given copy rights to that legal owner, I would think. Even if they didn't know the TOS, i don't think they can claim exception to it by another crime (their theft). Just as you can be help responsible to crimes you commit while under the influence of a drug.

    Does that make any sense?

    --
    Sig
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars
  78. Google Group by TechnoGuyRob · · Score: 4, Informative

    Already three forums have been overflowed by the traffic. I made a Google Group that definitely can handle the load:

    http://groups.google.com/group/stolensidekick

    Please mod up so people will become aware of this. I've already sent Evan an e-mail.

    1. Re:Google Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma WHORE!

      Slashdot is a ruthless place.

    2. Re:Google Group by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      Maybe not so definitely after all :)

  79. Well all I learned from that... by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    ...was to never use a T-Mobile Sidekick. T-Mobile doesn't seem to have the ability to immediately deactivate the device from their network. All I kept thinking as I was reading it was, "report it stolen to T-Mobile and get it deactivated."

    1. Re:Well all I learned from that... by wampus · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they did. As I understand it, everything you do on the Sidekick is actually done on Danger's servers. So when this person went out and replaced their Sidekick and logged in, there were all these lovely photos and videos, plus the person's AOL login.

    2. Re:Well all I learned from that... by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      In the article the author keeps saying the T-Mobile will eventually turn it off and tells the people repeatedly to not dispose of the phone because "that's tampering with evidence." Why is it that T-Mobile will eventually turn it off? Why can't they deactivate it immediately? I'm beginning to agree with others in this thread, I think the whole thing is a hoax.

  80. Re:Stealing how? by trewornan · · Score: 1

    In the UK this is definitely theft, unless you make a real effort to return it and are genuinely unable to - hardly applicable in this case. More reasonable if you find a tenner on the steet or something. If you take property from where it's owner left it, intending to keep it for yourself that's theft, even if the owner left it somewhere stupid by mistake.

  81. Re:useless with more info by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    >We need to know where the guys pics are located, where this happened etc, so we can geek band together and hunt this person down

    Have you checked the address?

    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=37th+ave+c orona+NY&ll=40.75393,-73.8612&spn=0.001445,0.00339 &t=k&om=1

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  82. About the girl by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I'd drive that like a truck.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:About the girl by Elminst · · Score: 1

      then keep driving right on to prison...
      She's reported to be 16, which is statutory in NY. Hence the further comments on the page about the big guy and paternity tests

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  83. Re:Stealing how? by cyber0ne · · Score: 2, Informative

    The dollar would be "lost" because the person who found it has absolutely no reasonable way to return it to its owner. A sidekick, or other similar device, is another story. Upon turning it on and finding that it has service, it's obvious that someone, somewhere is paying for it. That someone is not you. At that point, the reasonable thing to do is to hand it to the cabbie and say "someone left this back here." By taking it and using it, you are not only stealing their wireless services (by knowingly using a service you know you're not paying for), you are also retaining possession of an item that you know belongs to someone else. That's called possession of stolen goods, which actually is a crime (whether you're the person who stole it or not).

    --
    http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
  84. Re:Stealing how? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    Fair enough... I see your point.

  85. Talk about "ghetto" behavior... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi -

    Wow, I would hate to seem prejudiced, but what horrible behavior by the apparently black woman and the Hispanic guy....

    AC

  86. Re:Probably a stupid question, but it's bothering by cyber0ne · · Score: 2, Informative

    they're not his photos

    In what way are they not his? They were taken with his camera, uploaded to his account via his subscription. There's an old saying that possession is 9/10ths of the law, and at no point were these photos not in his possession. The camera was not in his possession, though it still belonged to him. But at no point were the photos, which are not physical objects, taken by or stored in any device not owned by him. They are his.

    I, ANAL

    --
    http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
  87. Deliberate "Shaming" Should Be Illegal by rdmiller3 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Does this vigilante think that he can "take down the site" if/when the thieves manage to satisfy his (changing) demands? If he does, then he's a fool.

    Has he heard of the Google cache?

    Does he know about the Wayback Machine?

    Putting up a "public humiliation" web site is an irrevocable action. All it would take would be one post on those boards and there could be a "flash lynch mob" of people angry about having lost their phones and this vigilante "shamer" would have no control of what that mob would do. The people depicted, their families, friends, and neighbors are all going to be affected by this and it isn't going to go away even if the shamer begs people to stop harassing them.

    That's what happened in China just a little while ago. A guy got mad at a student whom he suspected was fooling around with his wife. The student and his whole family were harassed to the point where they just hid in their homes. The wife was harassed too. Threats came from people who had read postings about the postings about the shamer's site. The shamer replaced his page, begging that people would just forget about it and leave them all alone... but apparently nobody was even reading his original site any more.

    I think that such "shamers" are irresponsible and dangerous. Putting up a site like that is akin to inciting riot.

    1. Re:Deliberate "Shaming" Should Be Illegal by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Has he heard of the Google cache?

      Does he know about the Wayback Machine?


      Maybe you should learn about things before talking about them, both of those respect the robots.txt file and the later has a manual removal page
    2. Re:Deliberate "Shaming" Should Be Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux:~ $ wget http://www.evanwashere.com/StolenSidekick/robots.t xt
      --01:01:43-- http://www.evanwashere.com/StolenSidekick/robots.t xt
                            => `robots.txt'
      Proxy request sent, awaiting response. 404 Not Found
      01:01:44 ERROR 404: Not Found.

      Maybe you should try stuff before commenting.

    3. Re:Deliberate "Shaming" Should Be Illegal by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      And you miss the point, congratulations. The original post was very clearly talking about such sites in general, not this site specifically.

      As for that site specifically, of course right NOW the person wants google hits and cache. The gp was talking about when they wish to remove such their site. THEN they can add a robots.txt which would remove them, retroactively, from the nice indexing services (archive.org, google cache included). Also both arhive.org and google cache can be directly asked to remove their cached content, and I assume both comply.

      In summary, the original posted picked two of the worst examples for why such a site is irrevocable as both of those are very removable (even "automatically" using robots.txt so it's never in the caches to begin with). And just because this site didn't do it correctly doesn't say anything about such sites in general (at least regarding those two services).

  88. Re:Today in the news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many things are criminal, many things are morally wrong; the GP is commenting on how to prioritize between them. In my view, he is right to some degree: this recent trend of vigilante punishment through mass shaming via blogosphere certainly does come with a lot more sympathy for the upper-class gadgeteer who lost their gadget in some (admittedly unfortunate and criminal) event than is actually deserved. (For the Rand fans who walk prominently among us on Slashdot, it should also be noted that that sympathy seems to carry over into monetary donations.)

  89. Re:Stealing how? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    But if someone found a dollar, how would they return it to you without any identification?

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  90. However..... by ezratrumpet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If that sidekick had belonged to Chuck Norris, it would have ceased to function in the hands of a mortal, particularly a thief. It would also have automatically summoned Chuck to the thief's real location, where Chuck would have traded him one sidekick for another.

  91. Ahhhh by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    Karma ia a beautiful thing. Best story I've read in a long while. It will be interesting to see how it all winds up.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  92. Re:Stealing how? by Copid · · Score: 1
    It seems kind of unreasonable to find an expensive piece of electronics laying about and assume that it has no owner, no? These things don't just pop into existence or run from the factory to the back seats of cabs. It takes some serious logical gymnastics to get around the fact that you are taking ownership of something that clearly already has an owner. This is especially the case when it's something that has a wealth of information stored on it that could be used to locate the original owner.

    Of course, as others have pointed out, it's definitely legally theft, especially after the rightful owner has contacted you and asked for it back. The idea that we should all have to keep our property within arm's reach lest it be repossessed by some lucky "finder" is not that far from the idea that anything that's "easy" to steal should be legal to steal.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  93. Bullshit by phorm · · Score: 1

    The problem is that somebody has no shame. Plenty of people get away with this sort of shit, and happily go on screwing others for the rest of their lives because in the grand scheme nobody notices or cares. Now maybe if those people realize that others are watching, and judging, perhaps they'll start acting more like decent human beings.

    The other side of the false accusation also falls under law, and there plenty of both legal and social repercussions for that, as well.

  94. I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by itwasgreektome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The subject is now in jail with 2 felony charges and some misdemeanor charges.

    Here's how it went down. A week ago I was at a gas station talking with my fiancee in the car while the tank was filling up. My phone was on the sidepocket of the door (the armrest thing on the door) and the door was open. I know, stupid move. But I had been really paranoid about losing it cause I had just bought it so I was checking on it every 30 seconds ago so I figured it was safe enough. The tank finally finished filling so I exited the car and that's when I noticed that my phone was missing.

    I did that whole thing where you check the ground and your pockets and begin to freak out. Then I remembered some dude had walked right by our car maybe 30 seconds before I saw it missing. I looked on the other side of our pump and there was this 40+ something Hispanic gangsta dude with tattoos all on his neck asking some people for money for his "Car that broke down."

    In his breast pocket I could see what appeared to be the outline of my phone. He saw me looking at him and approached me and gave me some cockeyed story about how he ran out of gas and if I could only spare a dollar or so it would really help him. I told him I was busy at the moment if he would wait for me "over there" (out of earshot) I would be with him and maybe I could help him.

    I looked at my fiancée and said, "Call my cellphone."

    She asks what's going on.

    I tell her just to do it.

    So she calls my phone.

    As I approach the guy I hear, clear as day, the techno ringtone coming from his breast pocket.

    Damn I love how loud that thing is.

    I get in his face and tell him to give me my phone back.

    He looks confused.

    I point at his pocket and say, "You stole my phone, give it now."

    He pulls it out of his pocket, gives it to me, and says, "Oh no man, I found this over there." (points to the opposite side of the gas station).

    "No you f*cking didn't. You stole that phone from me asshole. Don't play stupid fess up."

    "No man, I don't know what you are talking about. Look, can you spare me some money or what?" [he's trying to avoid the discussion]

    "You just f*cking stole my cell phone. You know how much that thing cost me? What, you think I'm rich or something?"

    At this point everyone in the gas station is looking at us cause I'm berating this punk and getting ready for a showdown.

    "Dude, if you don't want to help me that's fine."

    He starts walking across the street to another gas station to evade me.

    I look at my fiancée and say, "Call 911."

    I chase after the guy and call 911 myself and explain to the dispatcher what is happening. I'm no more than 5 feet behind this guy at all times while he's trying to evade me and people are wondering what's going on. At one point he comes at me in a threatening manner saying, "Man- Who you on the phone with!?" I tell him I'm calling the police.

    The dude runs back across the street and I run back after him weaving through traffic. He gets in a nice newer Nissan Maxima and I jump in front of the car and read off the plates to the dispatcher. The asshole tries to run me over with his f*cking car, peels out, and speeds away.

    By this time everyone in the gas station is in total awe looking at what unfolded before them.

    It takes forever to get the Sheriffs there but I'm pleased with the way they respond and handle the situation. They take a report from myself and witnesses. They later call me and tell me the license plate was registered to this guy's daughter. They went to her address and she told him to check at the ex-wife's. When they get there they find the dude. They discover heroin paraphernalia in his vehicle.

    They book him with Theft, drug, and assault with a deadly weapon (his car).

    What a day.

    The dude picked the wrong guy to f*ck with. In two weeks I'll be in police academy.

    Watch out for your stuff people. People are not always as they seem.

    1. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome story. Thanks for contributing. :)

    2. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on your location. Some local governments only have 911 for all reports and will have their 7 digit or 10 digit phone number forwarded to the 911 call center while others have 311 for non emergency. Examples: Round Rock, home of Dell Computers, only has a 911 call center manned by usually 3 dispatchers while Austin has separate call centers for 911, 311, and Animal Control.

    3. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by CDWalton · · Score: 1

      So I should just kill the f**ker than call 911? sounds good to me. I think one in the leg to slow him and then just beat him down real good.

      --
      When the going gets tough, the tough get drunk
    4. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by itwasgreektome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've worked for a police department for 4.5 years as a Community Service Officer. And soon will be working as a Police Officer in the LA area. A fleeing thief is an emergency, moron. He committed two felonies. How dare you tell people not to call 911 in such a case? You are SUPPOSED to call (that is, it is your civic duty) 911 if you see ANY crime being committed. Not only did this guy steal my phone, but he also tried to run me over with his car. You idiot. Would you really just let this guy get away because you got your phone back? I got someone off the street who'd probably been stealing from people for a while. Just a reminder people, 911 is there for you to call when crimes are being committed, no matter how petty you may think they are. P.S. Calling police on someone who takes your stuff is not "Revenge." You are a moron who could get a lot of people hurt by making them think, "Oh- he's just pounding on the door, it's not really a crime, oh, he just knocked down the door, it's not a crime, oh he's just threatening to kill me, police probably have something better to do...". Can someone please help me on this one? I'm having a hard time believing this guy would post something so ill-thought out.

    5. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I had a similar situation to this only the guy had two of his buddies with them and they proceeded to attack me, subsequently breaking my nose. In the melee, I was able to memorize their license plate and the next night the guy was pulled over (drunk of course). He's now facing a few years in jail.

    6. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear that buddy. Glad they got him. Yeah this guy that stole my phone turned out, as suspected, to be an old gangster. He looked pretty tough. But I guess I got lucky cause I'm decently big, was in his face, and there were lots of witnesses. At one point when he felt cornered he started toward me like he was becoming offensive but then I said, "You better get the f*ck out of here" and that worked cause he fleed rather than fought. One of those few moments in my life I wasn't scared cause I was prepared. Probably made my fiancee a little more nervous about what I'm gonna have to deal with as a police officer.

    7. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Buran · · Score: 1

      While I can understand wanting to get your stuff back ... you did a few illegal things yourself -- jaywalking, for instance, and obstructing traffic. Is it really worth it to put your life at risk by messing around with moving traffic, just for a cell phone? It's not like cell phones aren't a dime a dozen these days (ok, not quite THAT cheap, but...) and if you lose one you can get it replaced and the service transferred, with little trouble.

      You could have called it to establish it was in the guy's pocket, watched him walk toward his car, parked your car behind it to keep him from leaving, and had the attendant or a bystander call the police, without risking yourself or innocent drivers. (what if someone had hit you, the guy, or him as he peeled out?)

      Just let it go next time.

    8. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy's going to be a cop. Good for him. And yes, he will be risking his life on a daily basis to stop criminals.

    9. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by jridley · · Score: 1

      Please don't act like your "knowledge" is universal. In many areas of the country, including where I live, 911 is simply how you get hold of emergency people. Our townships do not have enough money to man all the posts all the time, so they use the 911 system to route calls to whichever post has someone there at the time. If you try to call the normal number, you may have to try 4 or 5 numbers (if you have them all) before you get anyone, especially at night.

      I have called 911 to report dangerous debris on the road that could cause an accident, and was thanked for it and they got a cruiser right out there to get the crap out of the road before someone got hurt by it.

      My son's cub scout pack had a deputy out to talk to them last year. He very carefully told them that they should use 911 "any time that they are really scared of something real" - he gave examples of strange people looking in windows and they were home alone, or if a family member seemed to be asleep and wouldn't wake up. He did caution them that dialling 911 was a serious step, once they hit those three numbers, a police car WOULD come to their house, regardless of what else happened, even if an adult said it was a mistake, but he really tried to impress on them that if they really felt it was a scary situation they SHOULD call.

      Besides, as has been already stated multiple times, 911 is for all real time situations, not just for when someone is bleeding or pointing a gun. In any area of the country, any situation where you need to talk to someone quickly, 911 is the right answer.

    10. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just about getting his cell phone back. It's about getting that piece of scum off the street so everyone elses cell phones, homes, and potentially lives, are safe.

    11. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Just a reminder people, 911 is there for you to call when crimes are being committed, no matter how petty you may think they are.

      I do think you should have called 911, as your situation could (and did) easily escalate into an emergency situation. But generalizing to calling 911 for any crime being committed, no matter how petty is going to far. Jaywalking and speeding are crimes too, but I'd certainly hope no one is clogging up 911 for something like that. The same goes for a loud party, or if your neighbor has to many dandelions in his yard. 911 is NOT for reporting any crime, it's for emergencies, potential emergencies, or when someones life may be in danger (drunk drivers, etc).

      --
      AccountKiller
    12. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe you are a rug and a sheep who doesn't mind getting stuff stolen from you or just getting taken advantage of all the time, but this guy wasn't and did all he should to get his stuff back. There's something called sticking up for yourself.

      If you don't fight for your rights and your stuff, what are you doing in this life?

    13. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by qzulla · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Calling people idiots and morons is not becoming of an up and coming officer.

      I hope you don't stop me for doing 5mph over the limit.

      I'm having a hard time believing this guy would post something so ill-thought out.

      Me too. About you.

      qz

    14. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Vraeden · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't be silly. Obviously, as the comments show, different parts of the country treat 911 differently. Regardless, there's a big difference between knocking down someone's door and someone who has handed you your property back and is WALKING AWAY from you BEFORE you've called. This guy's story had the guy walking away, not running him down, before calling. If the caller was truly scared, he wouldn't be following the thief.

    15. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Vraeden · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between "life" and "stuff". Stuff can be replaced.

    16. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Vraeden · · Score: 1

      Just as I may have been wrong about his location and whether it is okay to call 911 for non-emergencies there, do not assume that every area of the country wants 911 used for all real-time situations. In the busy metropolitan areas that I have lived in, 911 was reserved for life-threatening emergencies because other calls tend to flood the system; a flooded system means the heart-attack victim's call doesn't get through fast enough. A fleeing thief is not usually a life-threatening situation and can be handled by calling the police (which IMO ought to be a similar easy number to remember like 611 or such).
      Even without an easy to remember #, it is simple to add the local emergency numbers to your cell phone.
      In this post, the guy may have antagonized the gangster into trying to run him down, further endangering others over a measly phone. All he had to do was call and/or discreetly follow and get the license plate #.

      Kids, that's a different matter. Getting a kid to call anyone is a big step. I'd wait till they much more mature before worrying about the distinction between police and 911.

    17. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1
      Well, technically I suppose jaywalking and speeding are infractions, not misdemeanors, so they aren't really "crimes". Or if they are, we are all criminals.

      I do think the GP was fully justified in calling 911 - he had a thief in his sights, red-handed, who was likely (hell, 99.999% certain) to commit another crime in the near future. Definitely the right time to drop the dime.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    18. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Justice done under the cover of anonymity has less chance of you being a victim of revenge.

      Sucks that it's like that, since in America we're supposed to have the right to face our accusers, but I can see it working like this: have the GF confirm that it's your cell phone, then walk away. Have the GF (from inside your car) call the cops. Keep an eye on the guy, follow him if he drives off, keep your distance.

      The drug stuff is bonus, and greatly reduces the chances that reporting his stolen cell phone will result in him being targetted; more likely the arresting officer will bear the brunt of the criminal's ire, and there won't be much the criminal can do at that point.

      Of course, this guy is entering police academy soon, so the likelihood that he's been bulking up lately would explain the aggression and traffic-dancing. (Probably not using roids, since they'd likely test for that, but who knows?)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    19. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

      I would have, had I the chance. But I never knew the guy had a car. I thought he was on foot. Cause when he ran away from me he ran across the street (away from his car). The only way the police could then catch this guy was if I maintained obs on him. I saw him fleeing. I had to keep after him. It wasn't until when he ran back across the street did I notice he had a car. I noticed this at the point he hopped into it and tried to run me over in it. But truthfully you should always maintain obs on someone, from a safe distance. Who's to say if I got the plate that would do anything, cause if he had to beg for money and steal people's phones why would he be driving a decent car? Could have been stolen, in which case plates would mean nothing. I appreciate all the input though guys it's a fun discussion.

    20. Re:I had my Verizon Razr V3C stolen last week... by itwasgreektome · · Score: 2, Informative

      The guy who said I should not have called 911 IS a moron. He's potentially making people less likely to call 911 in the future. You must understand that people who make other people less safe out of their ignorance should not be treated lightly, hence the "moron." As well, I hope you are not likening me chasing down someone who stole my cell phone and tried to run me over with a car to someone who would pull someone over for going 5 MPH over the limit. Cause that would make you a moron.

  95. Re:stolen.. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other girl refused to return the item after she was informed that it didn't belong to her. This is theft.

  96. This is a HOAX by AriaStar · · Score: 0, Troll

    Aside from her losing it not making it stolen, that is.

    Here's how it would play out.

    She leaves her phone in a cab. Someone uses the phone to sign into AIM and take a couple pictures. Those pictures and that password are stored in the phone or on the SIM card in the phone she lost. Unless given back to her, she wouldn't have the pictures or that info because she doesn't have the phone or SIM card.

    This is on par with me losing a digital camera, buying a new one, popping in a new memory card, and having the pictures the "thief" who found my prior camera had taken after I lost it.

    The SIM card outside a phone isn't going to be able to send info to a new card, and right now the info on SIM cards made for Sidekicks (through T-Mobile only right now, unless I'm mistaken) can't be transfered from one card to another anyway by any means on the market.

    A more believable story would be that she checked to see what calls she was billed for and tried calling whoever the finder called.

    1. Re:This is a HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the website

      pls read first then post

      UPDATE #2: Some people are asking how we have their pics and AOL name. The way a Sidekick works, is that when you use it, all the data on it get's uploaded automatically to the T-Mobile server. So pictures you have taken, AOL names and passwords u have used, etc are all on the server. So when my friend turned on her new Sidekick and put her new SIM card in, all the data downloaded on to her phone. And that's how we have everything.

  97. Re:Probably a stupid question, but it's bothering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My understanding of the copyright law is that the PHOTOGRAPHER, not the owner of the camera, is given automatic copyright to the pictures. Either her or her friend owns the copyright to her pictures. If he published them, without the photographer's permission, then he is in violation of copyright law.
    There is also the complication of her being a minor. Not only would the photographer need her parent's permission to publish a minor's photograph, but the actual publisher would as well.

    Even if, through some loophole, the pictures belong to him...parental consent still applies for publishing since 1)these pictures were not taken in public and 2)the girl had a reasonable expectation to privacy.

    There is definitely a foundation to sue over the pictures being published, unless he received consent from her parents.

  98. This sounds legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hiptop Forums picked this up, evan posted a couple replies there:

    "And yes, my friend DID lose the Sidekick. It was her fault for leaving it in the taxi. But I don't know ANYONE that wouldn't return a phone they found in a taxi to the owner. And we DID offer these people a reward if they returned the phone...They decided to start the racial slurs... they decided to act all tough and mighty... Now it's my turn. "

    http://hiptop.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=44756

  99. Re:stolen.. wtf? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

    If you come across something, then the orignal owner contacts you asking you to give it back, you're obligated. In the case of using their service on the sidekick, then you're stealing from him 2 different ways. Then threatening him and having other people threaten him just really puts icing on the cake. Before they went and threatened him, they could have just dropped it off at the nearest police station, said they found it, then e-mail the guy and tell him it's in the found property bin at the PD. So if you find something and the owner comes to you with proof and asks for it back, you are obligated to return it, unless there's other legal precedents, say you legitimately claimed salvor's rights to something you found at sea, etc.

  100. Biased and racist by stoyan · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    It seems that the whole story is probably a rather biased account of what happened:
    1. As many have already noticed, the word "stolen" consistently appears on the page (URL, title, writing) but the Sidekick was actually LOST.
    2. We see a rather rude reply from the person that found it, but we do not know what preceded that. The author says that his friend "requested that the Sidekick be returned". Does not sound like she asked nicely -- you must ask nicely for a favor, even if you are a blonde white girl in Manhattan.
    3. The author is somewhat racist in his communication with the other party. "Let me tell you about a legal tenet called 'Caveat Emptor' it is Latin, it roughly translates to 'Let the buyer beware'" implies that Latinos know no Latin terms... Pardon the pun, I could not resist ;-)
    4. The story has factual inaccuracies. "My friend left her Sidekick II in a taxi inManhattan (where we live)" in the story and "On Jan 25th of this year, I moved to Miami, FL" in the "About Me" section are slightly different... By about 1,294 miles.
    5. The author spends an inordinate amounts of time and resources harrassing the people that found/bought the Sidekick. $300 are not worth it, unless you have no life.
    1. Re:Biased and racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Not returning it after being requested to by the legal owner made it theft.
      2. In addition to your assuming facts not in evidence, one legally can't keep lost property after the owner has tried to reclaim it.
      3. How is that racist? From their grammer, the thief and her friends are likely poorly educated.
      4. Read the website. He visits friends in NYC.
      5. In the principle. And damn entertaining.

  101. Google Groups Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Google has been /.ed

    From the main google groups page:

    Description: About the stolen Sidekick. NOTE: Some posts in this group may be indecent. Read at your own discretion.
    EDIT: "Your message could not be posted to the Stolen Sidekick group because there have been too many messages posted to the group recently."

    Ok guys, we did it...NOTHING can stop this madness!


    too funny.
  102. The Transparent Society by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we've had Dog Shit Girl and The New York Subway Wanker (and another similar).

    It's going to get more and more common. Everyone ought to read David Brin's The Transparent Society.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  103. Story is still plausible by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those pictures and that password are stored in the phone or on the SIM card in the phone she lost.

    Well, on my phone there is the option of storing information in three places and IIRC you can set the default location as well. Those three places are:

    1) Phone's internal memory
    2) SIM Card
    3) "My Online Album"

    I think another poster here (and I think the author of the "revenge page") explained as much. The wireless service provider has central storage servers for its subscribers (given they pay the approriate fee or sign up on certain plans). On the upside, you can access the data from your "online album" from your PC's web browser, there is more capacity than available on the device and SIM card, and your data is not lost if you lose your phone. OTOH, you lose all your privacy...if a phone company will turn over phone records to busybody G-Men without a warrant you can bet they'll turn over address books, pics, videos, etc. at the drop of a hat as well.

  104. Re:Probably a stupid question, but it's bothering by Kaemaril · · Score: 1

    Actually, the pictures have never been in his possession. The pictures were not taken when the device was in his possession, they now reside on a server that does not belong to him, nor is the server in his possession.

    All the copyright law I've read (not huge lots, just the usual stuff. IANAL) is very clear - the owner is the person who originated the work, not the person who owns the medium ... unless, of course, it's a work for hire.

    That's why I was wondering what the situation is ... is there case law? Precedent? Is there a section I've not read that covers copyrightable works created using a stolen medium? You'd think it'd be something of a rarity, but I'm sure it must have happened before.

    As to EULAs and agreements ... well, the thieves probably didn't agree to anything when they started snapping away, so an EULA wouldn't apply to them. This means they're probably in violation of the TOS so the service provider probably has a case against them, but I don't see that this in anyway gives the original sidekick owner copyright.

  105. He called the right number - 911 by vinn01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He called the right number - 911

    911 is for "real time" situations. You should call well before it becomes a life-threatening emergency.

    In my district, you're not only supposed to call 911 for a fleeing thief, you're supposed to call 911 before they become a thief and flee. I can tell you with certainty that my local police commander would have encouraged people at that gas station to call 911 with a suspicious person report before he stole anything. Think about it, does the guy's panhandling story make any sense (unless it was a bus terminal)?

    1. Re:He called the right number - 911 by TheSystemHasFailed · · Score: 1

      Actually I make it a point to call 911 on panhandlers - even at bus terminals. I saw one threatening a young couple because they didn't want to give him money.

  106. Jabba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Jabba the Mutt that stole the phone. O_O

    And he's hiding it in his rectum

    http://www.myspace.com/gordo718

    Just look at that picture, at the guy's facial expression. Obviously he has an item stuck in there that shouldn't be there.

  107. You left out the part... by beamdriver · · Score: 1

    ...about the 27, 8x10, color, glossy photos with the circles and the arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining they were to be used against them.

    1. Re:You left out the part... by dancing+blue · · Score: 1

      so what happens? they get fined $50 and told to pick up the garbage :)

    2. Re:You left out the part... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      typical case of american blind justice.....

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  108. Visor deluxe? by paulproteus · · Score: 1

    Timothy was still using a Handspring Visor Deluxe in 2005? Golly!

    --
    |/usr/games/fortune
  109. Dumb is as dumb does by jridley · · Score: 1

    Yesterday in the local paper there was an article about a woman who's house was broken into and a lot of stuff stolen. One day she came home and her neighbor was having a yard sale, SELLING HER STUFF.

    Yeah, there are some really less than bright individuals out there.

  110. Re:Looking at the pics... by Ipeunipig · · Score: 1

    MOMMY, MOMMY, Can I feed the racist???? No dear, racists need to die a slow painful death of starvation for being the hairy pimple on the ass of humanity.

  111. Question: Backup plans? by Neoncow · · Score: 1

    I'm not in a position like yours but I'm curious about what your backup plan would be. Do you have a second phone that you could activate in case of the first one failing? or would you simply run out to a store and buy a new one?

  112. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  113. What I'd do. :-) by r00t · · Score: 1

    I have curiosity and a screwdriver. The phone goes to phone-heaven, fast.

    If I find a phone, I figure:

    a. using the service is fraud
    b. the physical object is mine
    c. a phone without service is spare electronic parts

    If you lost your phone, you probably discontinued service and got
    a new free phone already. If the phone mattered, you wouldn't have
    lost it. Maybe the phone was already broken and you were littering.

    It's not as if I can test the phone without committing fraud, hmmm?
    Using your phone service to contact you would be theft.

    So, out comes the screwdriver. Oooh, educational!

    1. Re:What I'd do. :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never had an object slip out of your pocket without you realizing it? Or that the person in question might not have backed up their contact list elsewhere? And no, it would not be fraud to call someone on their list and say "Hi, I found this persons cell phone, do you know of some other way to contact them?" It would be 'Acting like a good person' - Something you are obviously not, what with your attempt to justify theft. You are one of the things wrong with the world. I fervently pray you are electrocuted in the process of taking apart a cell phone that you stole. That would be justice.

  114. Sidekick stolen. What is the Tick going to do? by Anthony · · Score: 1

    I immediately thought Arthur had been whisked away!

    --
    Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  115. Re:Today in the news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comparing a dumbass carelessly leaving their phone in the back of a cab to grand theft auto. Great analogy! Your head may not be in your ass, but it is definately up someone's ass.

    I think the idea is that we should spend our time focusing on REAL problems, not one tards quest for revenge over what is in reality a pointless endeaver that only effects himself and no one else.

  116. 9 to 5? by jvance · · Score: 1

    Who in hell works 9 to 5. If you take an hour lunch, that's 35 hours a week. Slacker.

    1. Re:9 to 5? by karmatic · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood - that's 9AM to 5AM.

      Welcome to the new economy.

  117. Well, actual law says... by BobPaul · · Score: 1
    Common law is that the finder of a lost item could claim the right to possess the item against any other person in the world except the true owner. If I find a phone on the street, it is mine unless someone who can prove ownership asks me for it. I am not obliged to look for them, and I am not obliged to return it in the absense of proof of their ownership.

    I'm don't know anything about common law, I'll admitt it. But occasionaly, I do look up actual hard-written laws when I'm curious about things. In North Dakota, where I live, this is covered by NDCC 60-01-34 through 42. Here is a summary of this section of legislature:

    60-01-34 Finder - Depositary for hire - Assumption of ownership by finder.
    One who finds a thing lost is not bound to take charge of it but, if the person does so, the person is thenceforward a depositary for the owner with the rights and obligations of a depositary for hire. ...
    60-01-35 Finder must notify owner.
    If the finder of a thing knows or suspects who is the owner, the finder must give such owner notice of the finding with reasonable diligence. If the finder fails to do so, the finder is liable in damages to the owner and has no claim to any reward offered by the owner for the recovery of the thing nor to any compensation for the finder's trouble or expenses.
    60-01-36 Finder may require proof of ownership.
    The finder of a thing, before giving it up, may require in good faith, reasonable proof of ownership from any person claiming it.
    60-01-37 Compensation and reward to finder.
    The finder of a thing is entitled to compensation for all expenses necessarily incurred by the finder in its preservation and for any other services necessarily performed by the finder about it and to a reasonable reward for keeping it.
    60-01-38 Storing releases finder from liability.
    title tells all, no quote needed
    60-01-39 When finder may sell.
    The finder of a thing may sell it, if it is a thing which is commonly the subject of sale, when the owner, with reasonable diligence, cannot be found, or, being found, refuses upon demand to pay the lawful charges of the finder in the following cases:
    1. When the thing is in danger of perishing or of losing the greater part of its value; or
    2. When the lawful charges of the finder amount to two-thirds of its value.


    As soon as they picked up the phone they became responsible for it's care and legally bound to search for the owner. No, they aren't nessicarily bound to put up flyers but I'm sure it would require them to take it to a TMobile shop and have them find the person who's account is electronically bound to the device, or hand it over to the police. It's not like this was an unmarked sweater that would be difficult to asscertain ownership of.

    In any event they definately suspected who the owner was since the person was text messaging the phone saying "I lost this found, return it and recieve a reward!" Had they responded to the text message and said "Hey, I found your phone" they could have demanded a reward, legally, even if the owner hadn't been offering one. Now, however, even though the owner was offering a reward they have no claim to it and are responsible for damages should something happen to the phone, especially since it was obviously in working order when found as they used it to take pictures.

    And of course, IANAL and I don't know about NY Law. The above legal quote was from animalaw.info because a trip to the library is a little difficult at 12:30 am.
  118. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  119. oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quote:
    "I am not going to go to the address posted above, because a.) Not going to waste my time going to a probable fake address b.) If it is real, there will be a physical altercation and I would probably wind up arrested which would do no good to anyone."

    and I suppose it has nothing to do with 300Kg guy in a photo?

  120. Suspect Info/Phone # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the Google group:

    I know it's posted in other places here, but people are still asking for the address, so here is what I know: People have narrowed it down to the following: Jose Herrera 10820 37th Dr Corona, NY 11368-2033 (718) 478-4632 This seems to also match the original comment made by 'Sasha'...

  121. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so i saw sum otha guyz doin dis so leik i copies dem and so wen wii all tawks liek dis lawl

  122. The NEW reality show. by Punch-Drunk+Slob · · Score: 1

    What with the enormous amount of hits the website has gotten in so short a span of time, maybe incidents like this will spark a trend and soon be The Internet's Reality TV.

    --
    By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes: Open, locks, whoever knocks!
  123. Where is Dog the Bounty Hunter when you need him? by qsqueeq · · Score: 1

    NM

  124. Re:useless with more info by Sirfrummel · · Score: 1

    I think I see a dropped sidekick on the road in that picture!

  125. Re:Probably a stupid question, but it's bothering by fonetik · · Score: 1
    "... does a music recording made with a stolen guitar become the players, or the owners?"

    So if I'm writing this reply on a stolen computer, is it still my comment?

  126. Stucking Up by fm6 · · Score: 1
    There's something called sticking up for yourself.
    And there's something called using your head. If he'd been hit by a car while chasing the thief through traffic, his medical bills would make that stupid cell phone look a lot less expensive. He even could have been killed.

    If you hear of somebody getting killed this way (and it does happen a lot), you can go to his funeral and say, "Hey, at least he stuck up for himself." But I don't recommend it.