Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) Beta Released

vivaoporto writes "The Beta version of the popular Linux distribution, Ubuntu 7.04, was released today. Codenamed Feisty Fawn, the CD images can be downloaded from the Canonical Servers, and the final version is due to be released next month. Get it while it's hot! Read more about it on the official wiki."

429 comments

  1. download speeds... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm at 130KB/s before this news goes public... I wonder how for it will go down after the story hits the front page...

    1. Re:download speeds... by smaddox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if you used bittorrent, it would go up =P (after enough ppl had parts downloaded.

    2. Re:download speeds... by maswan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps you should try making everybody use mirrors?

      Here's the list from the announcement:

          Europe:

              http://se.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Sweden)
              http://es.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Spain)
              http://nl.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (The Netherlands)
              http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/linux/ubuntu/7.04 (The Netherlands)
              http://ie.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Ireland)
              http://it.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Italy)
              http://pl.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Poland)
              http://de.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Germany)
              http://bg.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Bulgaria)

          Australia:

              http://au.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04

          Africa:

              http://za.releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (South Africa)

          Rest of the world:

              http://releases.ubuntu.com/7.04 (Great Britain)

    3. Re:download speeds... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Perhaps you should try making everybody use mirrors? Here's the list from the announcement:
      Mod up for the helpful guy. Here I am just trying to test a theory and maswan goes and actually gives insightful information.

      I am now getting closer to 200Kb/s. Weird.
    4. Re:download speeds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about now? Please keep us up to date. It's riveting.

    5. Re:download speeds... by holomorph · · Score: 1

      see, now that's what I figured, but I'm still under 50 KB/s on my download, though the upload is hitting 80 or 90. Weird because the torrent of Herd 5 I grabbed yesterday was much faster. (I was about to burn that one to CD when I read the announcement that the new beta was out today :p)

    6. Re:download speeds... by What'sInAName · · Score: 1


      Not sure why someone modded you offtopic. They must not have realized what your comment referred to.

      I tried a couple of servers in Europe, and they were all 100KB. Then I tried the South African server and that bounced around a bit, but seemed to stay near 200KB on average. I got mine, and so far it looks good!

    7. Re:download speeds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is Great Britain not in Europe?

    8. Re:download speeds... by jorgepblank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Haha, what makes you think 'faggots' don't use windows? Or Mac?

      --
      - Jorge Peña
    9. Re:download speeds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, where's "Gaydows" or "GayOS X"? There is Gaybuntu.

    10. Re:download speeds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why someone modded you offtopic.

      Because the mods around here are a bunch of retards. I swear, is slashdot offering mod points to troglodytes and ogres these days? You'd think so based on their apparent reading comprehension.
    11. Re:download speeds... by SCHPONG · · Score: 1

      It's the world conquering British Empire!

  2. How does this compare by Tim_F · · Score: 2, Funny

    How does this compare to the amazing OpenSUSE 10.2?

    1. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Basically it's about 3.18 less.

      I'm hoping SuSe gets turned all the way up to 11. That'd rock!

    2. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can giggle all you want, but OpenSUSE is the ONLY distro that I have ever used that I didn't have to hack at various config files for 2 hours to make dual monitors work. Get back to me when Ubuntu can do dual monitors out of the box.

    3. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One big difference is that when you use Ubuntu, you are not supporting Microsoft's effort to undermine Linux. Alas, SuSE users cannot make the same claim.

    4. Re:How does this compare by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can giggle all you want, but OpenSUSE is the ONLY distro that I have ever used that I didn't have to hack at various config files for 2 hours to make dual monitors work. Get back to me when Ubuntu can do dual monitors out of the box.


      Get an nVidia-based card and use the nVidia proprietary drivers. Once you install them, setting up dual monitors is as easy as adding one line to xorg.conf, or turning it on with nvidia-xconfig
    5. Re:How does this compare by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Is that the one with the broken package manager? or was that 10.1? I gave up on Suse very fast after realizing this problem. A non-beta release should at least have working package manager and update application working after an install with the default options? What I want to know is, does this one finally have a 3D desktop?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:How does this compare by future+assassin · · Score: 1
      Two days ago I decided to give Linux asa desktop another try.

      Linspire 5 Was nice but just didnt feel as polished as Windows 2000 Pro. Yah it looked nice but I dont care for eye candy. Plus the subscription to the software reporitory had expired. Didn't feel like paying it.

      Suse 10.2 heh I really wanted to try this distro. First download of the dvd ended being 1.7 gigs instead of the 3+ gigs. Second try ended up with corrupt files. Third try ended up with being good except when it came time to load the packages at the start. The install failed and so on... Fuck this I said.

      Ubuntu First download and install went good. So far cant seem to find any problems. Although it going to take time to get used to the filesystem, gui and etc... I just dont know atm if I really should go ahead with it. W2K Pro is just so fast and nice "for me"

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    7. Re:How does this compare by Spliffster · · Score: 1

      hehe ... it's rpm based. i gave up with suse and redhat 5 years ago when i discovered the beautynes of deb packages, easy and powerful tools and carefully managed repositories.

    8. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OpenSUSE 10.2 is fantastic and easy to use. They may be in league with the devil, but I found it much better and less annoying than an install I had of Ubuntu 6.06 "Crappy". Both have good package managers, it's a matter of preference. They're only as good as their repositories anyway. I like being able to run the curses-based yast over SSH or whatever.

      For new Linux users, though, I can see how Ubuntu would be popular. Anything that advances the cause of desktop Linux is a good thing.

      Anonymous Coward, NCLP ;-)

    9. Re:How does this compare by fforw · · Score: 2, Informative

      if you do that on a laptop (Dell Latitude D820 in my case) you might also want to install wmctrl to get back your gnome panels when you come home from work and it puts them on the no longer existing other monitor.. (I'd really like to know why the window coordinates are doubled for the gnome panels..)

      --
      while (!asleep()) sheep++
    10. Re:How does this compare by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Why would you stop using win2kpro, it provides you with the cheapest possible games console and you can dual boot to Ubuntu to get your work done reliably and as a major benefit, rebuild you win2kpro install when ever it inevitably falls over.

      Having a Linux dual boot makes for quick and easy backups, not of course from HDisk failure but certainly from the inevitable windows non-recoverable crash.

      You have already paid for you M$ toy operating system, and there are a swag of games you can play on it, so why would you throw it away, that would be nearly as silly as paying for an operating system as an OEM and then paying three times as much to throw it away and replace it with the same operating system but a version that just runs slower even when you add a whole lot more ram and leaves you hardware running at reduced functionality when ever it feels like it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:How does this compare by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      What is it exactly that makes deb packages better than RPMs? Do they contain all the dependancies in the package? or are the Repositories just better maintained? Things have changed a lot since 5 years ago, and installing and managing RPMs with a distro like Mandrake is a cinch.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SEE!!! Exactly WTF I am talking about. And just how exactly am I supposed to rip out the video card in my laptop and replace it with an nVidea one? Windows has been able to do dual monitors out of the box for 10 years, Mac for 20 years, and I'm supposed to run Ubuntu why? I'll stuck with Open SUSE for my Linux needs. They may not be trendy, they may be associated with an evil corporation, but they don't have their head up their ass for basic hardware stuff.

    13. Re:How does this compare by Markspark · · Score: 1

      yeah, with the correct drivers, not exactly out-of-the-box.. i havent tried suse since suse 5, but i'm sure you're right about it's userfriendlyness, and i'm glad you like it.. tell people to use it..
      i use ubuntu, and i like it, so i tell people to use it.. my point being: use what makes you feel comfortable.. :)

      --
      i find your lack of faith in science disturbing!
    14. Re:How does this compare by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      If Win2kpro rocks your boat and does everything your little heart could possibly desire, then why bother changing?

      In my case, I did my distro-hopping between between 1997 and 2001 after a long spell with Slackware. I eventually went back to Slackware, and that's what I still use today. And a very cool and froody desktop Slackware can make, too, especially in combination with Dropline Gnome.

      I'm getting off the point here, which is that if you use a given system a lot (by which I mean years, not just a one-day trial), whether it be Ubuntu, OpenBSD or whatever, you eventually find yourself getting familiar with it to the extent that Windows just doesn't cut it.

      However, all bets are off if you're into gaming.There you don't really have much choice.

    15. Re:How does this compare by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The problem is mostly Repositories maintenance... lots of packages you need to leave the 'official' tree to find, but the repositories that put the extra stuff usually don't follow up with the proper dependencies.

      Also, from my experience, RPM systems (especially YUM) seem to be much slower than the deb/APT system. ... I like to call .deb mirrors 'repositories' and .rpm mirrors suppositories.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:How does this compare by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Well, I tried OpenSuSE yesterday. It didn't detect my nVidia card, nor did it configure X to run with any other drivers. Oh, and it also installed /boot onto my secondary hard drive and wiped out 140GB of files. Sure I guess i shouldn't have had the secondary drive in the machine, but really who'd expect a distro to install to a second drive when I gave a nice big 160 all to itself?

      I'm back to Fedora 6. Lucky for me the files on the secondary were torrented and replaceable.

    17. Re:How does this compare by xrobertcmx · · Score: 1

      That is why I always, always, verify the partition scheme prior to installing. It is a pain to burrow down that many levels YAST install, but it works.

    18. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ditto. i NEVER muck around with partitioning. Trust no one, trust no software! Verify, verify, verify!!!!

    19. Re:How does this compare by fforw · · Score: 1

      windows multi monitor support wasn't exactly out of the box as it kept forgetting about it. I had to basically reconfigure it after every boot. It also often chose the wrong resolution -- not to mention the bluescreens I was getting and which made me lose work multiple times..

      And what could I do about it? NOTHING! Just bow your head and reconfigure/reboot.. you're not supposed to do anything. either it works or you're fucked.

      Sure.. the lost panel thing is a bug and was annoying.. but as usual with linux there is something I can do about it.. I would certainly prefer gnome to open its panel on the screen all the time, but as it is I just open a terminal and use wmctrl to move the panels.. no big deal..

      So all in all Feisty alpha gave me a working desktop where I can do work on without losing it again.. something the oh-so-professional out-of-the-boxy Windows did not manage.. Ubuntu and the others linux distributions I tried over the years just give me that calm feeling of having a desktop I can rely on. There is *LOTS* of stuff which is simply better than Windows for me.. I left Windows some years ago and never looked back.. I only use it when my work forces me to and fucking hate it everytime..

      --
      while (!asleep()) sheep++
    20. Re:How does this compare by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Well, I saw the reference to /dev/hdb pass by quickly in the announced partitioning, but by then it was too late.

      I found the entire partitioning manager in OpenSuSE much more difficult to use than the one in Fedora/RedHat/CentOS.

    21. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, the names have achieved greater stupidness. I'm waiting for Foetid Fart before I switch.

    22. Re:How does this compare by tanachi · · Score: 1

      no offense.... 97% of linux box on my college is under debian(ubuntu's parent). because there debian's mirror here...(locally accessed) wonder if it were openSuse' mirror....... may be now there is 99,99% of openSuse user here :D 1 more no offense, but full defense :DD

    23. Re:How does this compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10.2 - 7.04 = 3.16. not 3.18.

    24. Re:How does this compare by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      42

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
  3. Damnit... by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I still haven't managed to give away all those 6.06 CDs I got from ShipIt!

    1. Re:Damnit... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 5, Informative

      And I still haven't managed to give away all those 6.06 CDs I got from ShipIt! That's OK because

      A) 6.06 is the long term support (LTS) release, meaning that it will be good for a couple years to come

      B) After the last upgrade fiasco, the Ubuntu devs are putting special care to make sure the update tool works this time, so people can just install 6.06 and then use the update manager to update to 7.04 if they decide they want it.

      C) They won't ship CDs of another release until the next LTS release, so there won't be any 7.04 CDs either.
      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    2. Re:Damnit... by Markrian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just to clarify, the upgrade process cannot skip interim releases. That is, to upgrade from 6.06 to 7.04, the recommended and supported path is to go from 6.06 -> 6.10 -> 7.04. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes

    3. Re:Damnit... by sveard · · Score: 1

      There will be cd's for 7.04 just like there are for 6.10 (not the LTS release, that's 6.06), but unlike the LTS release, shipping has to be paid for.

      At least, that's how I understood it.

    4. Re:Damnit... by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

      On that note, do you know when the next LTS release is planned?

    5. Re:Damnit... by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      B) After the last upgrade fiasco, the Ubuntu devs are putting special care to make sure the update tool works this time
      Great, can they fix what they broke during my last upgrade? I haven't been able to get to my /home directory in months. At least I recovered from the upgrade before that; with the help of a Unix guru. Considering that I've had major problems with Ubuntu upgrades (one from Breezy to Dapper, the other a minor upgrade), I don't trust them at all.
    6. Re:Damnit... by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More proof that Ubuntu devs need to focus more on making upgrade not so much of a problematic pain in the ass.

    7. Re:Damnit... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1

      There will be cd's for 7.04 just like there are for 6.10 (not the LTS release, that's 6.06), but unlike the LTS release, shipping has to be paid for.

      At least, that's how I understood it. I realized I should have clarified that after I hit the submit button: You won't get free CDs by ShipIt until the next LTS, but of course people will download the ISOs, stamp them and sell them (maybe even canonical does this themselves?)
      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    8. Re:Damnit... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1

      There has been nothing official announced AFAIK, but Mr. Shuttleworth has said that LTS releases will be a regular thing and people on the Ubuntuforums strongly suspect that LTS will settle into a 2 year release cycle, meaning the next one would be 8.04.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    9. Re: Damnit... by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      B) After the last upgrade fiasco, the Ubuntu devs are putting special care to make sure the update tool works this time, so people can just install 6.06 and then use the update manager to update to 7.04 if they decide they want it.
      Alas, how I wish this is something that the Fedora devs would get. The fact that it is so almost impossible to reliable upgrade between FC versions (and not just almost impossible to do it without rebooting), is by far the largest reason that I use Gentoo instead of Fedora.
    10. Re:Damnit... by sveard · · Score: 1

      6.06 + 24 months = 8.06 ;)

    11. Re:Damnit... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 5, Informative

      B) After the last upgrade fiasco, the Ubuntu devs are putting special care to make sure the update tool works this time
      Great, can they fix what they broke during my last upgrade? I haven't been able to get to my /home directory in months. At least I recovered from the upgrade before that; with the help of a Unix guru. Considering that I've had major problems with Ubuntu upgrades (one from Breezy to Dapper, the other a minor upgrade), I don't trust them at all. I see your thread: http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=36143 3

      That is why I always suggest people not to upgrade unless they have a specific reason to; if what you have works the way you want it to, run with it.

      My best recommendation would to do a new install. That would (obviously) be faster than trying to fix the set up as it is now. If I were you, I would put the entire OS including /home (maybe partition so that you have 9gig to /, 1 gig swap, 10 gig /home) on your first drive (20 gig should be more than enough), and then during the install/partitioning step just mount the other HD in /media/storage and keep all your big files (movies and such) there. I'm on the Ubuntuforums if I can help you more just drop me a private message. It might take me a couple days but I'll answer.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    12. Re:Damnit... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1

      6.06 + 24 months = 8.06 ;) Except that 6.06 was supposed to be 6.04, it was just a couple months late getting out the door. They're back on schedule (release in April and October)
      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    13. Re:Damnit... by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I was wondering if that was possible, since all of my /home data is on a separate (40G) drive. So, installing a new version on my 20 Gig will keep everything on my 40 Gig untouched? If you could send me a private message on ubuntuforms I'll be able to contact you easier, if I need to.

    14. Re:Damnit... by cronius · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was wondering: Can you actually sell ubuntu CDs that you download?

      I know how the GPL works, but in the case of Redhat, you have e.g. CentOS which is their enterprise product stripped away for trademarked logos and stuff in order to be able to redistribute it. So I was wondering if perhaps the same would go for selling downloaded ubuntu CDs, that you're not allowed if you don't strip away that kind of content first?

      (That's probably a tough question, I'll take guessing and hearsay a plenty.)

      --
      Life is Reality
    15. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Great, can they fix what they broke during my last upgrade?"

      Yeah, it's damn annoying. I waited a few months then did the upgrade, only to find 6.10 really shouldn't have been released; 6.06 was great except for beagle popping up.

      What I don't understand is that all the "special care" in the 7.04 release should have been spent fixing the many known issues in 6.10. If they don't bother fixing known issues, why is there any trust in upgrading the system to a new version?

      A lot of the "eye candy" that went in 6.10 makes a lot of things look worse than they did. The color schemes in 6.06 was simple. I can see what they tried in 6.10, but the startup splash got screwed up, the login background is not as clean on many systems, some systems still don't have the orange color progress bar (it's transparent or grey) despite it being a well known issue.

      Icons got changed; torrent files even lost their icon entirely. ntpdate doesn't work via the GUI, as if developers all had ntp installed and just couldn't test it; works fine via command line. "Recent Documents" docs haven't been updated and still show a hack/wanted feature that now doesn't work. All issues documented and unfixed in 6.10.

      And some config files still have a typo in them. Not to mention the large number of people that seemed to have gotten their distro download links mauled. Some screwup forgot a separator in on of the /etc files (I forget which, I just got pissed and stopped using that one prog since it kept core dumping because of it), which you can manually fix easy enough, and it's been reported, but when they pushed an update a couple months ago, it restored the broken file.

      All in all, bugs that have been there for time on end just haven't gotten fixed in 6.10, which makes me very afraid to update to 7 even though I'm hoping many of these issues have been resolved. In the end, Ubuntu should spend some time developing a tripwire/checksum program but not for security, but to help installers compare their files with the official ones to see what files are missing, corrupt, or incorrectly updated aka hosed. I would have moved on SuSE, except for the Novell deal. And I like Evolution, even though its not perfect, and has some non-mail bugs, it's pretty nice for free software.

    16. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      B) After the last upgrade fiasco, the Ubuntu devs are putting special care to make sure the update tool works this time

      Um, no we're not...

    17. Re:Damnit... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You guys are scaring me. I'm in the process of putting a system together for UbuntuStudio (when it comes out) and now I'm hearing you saying stuff's broken. What's up with that?

      I'm dedicated to making an earnest effort with Linux for professional audio/video production. I don't want to be hearing about typos in config files and such.

      Look, I can still use the case, mobo, drives and memory I've gotten for this UbuntuStudio project for something else. Will someone here please tell me if I'm wasting my time or not? I don't expect installing and configuring Linux to be as easy as OSX, but I need to know whether this thing is ready for prime time, or at least ready to use as a secondary platform for audio.

      Is there anyplace I can find all these little problems I'm going to have to deal with to get Ubuntu to work? Or will these things even matter? I would like dual-monitor support, by the way. Do I stay or do I go?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:Damnit... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's simply that the move from dapper->edgy was painful. Ubuntu made it _clear_ before hand that edgy was an "edgy" release. There were going to be lots of changes and no guarantees for some things. Edgy made a lot of progress, but it's "new" school. Upstart, UUIDs for fstab, etc, were huge changes.
      If you do a fresh install of feisty, you'll be just fine. Dualmonitor support takes a little (I mean a little) file editing if you have nvidia.

    19. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I should really be able to upgrade directly from Win2K to Vista.

      *rolls eyes*

    20. Re:Damnit... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      On the Ubuntu website they link to a bunch of places that sell Ubuntu CDs. None of them look to have any special link with Canonical, so that's a strong indication that it's OK to do it.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    21. Re:Damnit... by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 2

      But windows certainly isn't updated as often. Think of it more as XP original to SP2.

    22. Re:Damnit... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can you actually sell ubuntu CDs that you download?

      You can sell GPL'd binaries, so long as you provide source code as well.

      That can mean you wait for someone to ask, then you ship them a CD of the source code for $2, or you can make it easy and just include source code on the CD, or on another separate CD along with the binary CD.

      Distros usually make it easy, by providing ISOs or packages of the source code for download. Fortunately for you, Ubuntu is no different: ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/dapper/main/sour ce/

      <RANT>
      IMHO, Open Source on Windows isn't going to get much traction because of this... The GPL requires you provide source with your binaries, but most GPL'd Windows projects don't provide a source package... only binaries, and you have to go upstream, or look around for CVS/SVN instructions to create your own snapshot. Whether it's ClamWin, Cygwin, cdrdao, or most anything else, you've got lots of work to do to find the source code.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    23. Re:Damnit... by miro+f · · Score: 1

      But windows certainly isn't updated as often. Think of it more as XP original to SP2.


      it's been a while since I've done this, but doesnt upgrading from XP to SP2 require the installation of SP1? Not to mention rebooting about 15 times.

      you can upgrade from 6.06 to 7.04 with only one reboot =)
      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    24. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The fact is that breezy to dapper broke mine (and just about anybody who was using RAID) ---> drive ordering changed. Furthermore the bug was known *before* the release [two weeks]. The problem is that they have more strict release schedules rather than the "release when it's ready" viewpoint. This has completely destroyed the reliability of apt dist-upgrade. I simply would *never again* do a dist-upgrade in Ubuntu!

      Anon.

    25. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yes we are.

      (Anyone can make anonymous comments on Slashdot. But I'm actually a Ubuntu developer.)

    26. Re:Damnit... by plj · · Score: 1

      it's been a while since I've done this, but doesnt upgrading from XP to SP2 require the installation of SP1? Not to mention rebooting about 15 times.

      No, it does not. Service Packs of MSFT's Win NT-line OSes have always been cumulative.

      And the last time I did this, it required exactly one reboot, which could not be avoided on any os, because the kernel is upgraded. Installing all those critical hotfixes released after SP2 may require more than one additional reboot, however.

      That said, Ubuntu is still vastly superiour, because APT automatically upgrades almost all of your userland software at the same time. This is definitely something no commercial OS can match. Actually many, if not most of the reboots during a typical XP installation are demanded by installations of various commercial supposed-do-be-userland-only apps.

      Interestingly enough, Windows versions of OSS apps usually behave much better in this regard, and are relatively smoothly installable without any reboots. It seems that installer-mandated reboots are mostly disease of commercial apps.
      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    27. Re:Damnit... by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      I was wondering: Can you actually sell ubuntu CDs that you download?
      I'm guessing you've never used eBay, where lots of people try to sell their FOSS CDs to people who don't realize that you can get them for free.
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    28. Re:Damnit... by freewaybear · · Score: 0

      C) They won't ship CDs of another release until the next LTS release, so there won't be any 7.04 CDs either.

      That's what the Shipit ordering page said, but last week I received 10 cds of 6.10 (Edgy). It surprised me, I was fully expecting 6.06 LTS.

      --
      Registered Linux User #404114 [url=http://www.punkoiska.com][img]http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/4379/posbannercf5.g
    29. Re:Damnit... by psychokitten · · Score: 1

      Well then it evens out, because I never even -got- my CDs from ShipIt!

    30. Re:Damnit... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, the upgrade process cannot skip interim releases. That is, to upgrade from 6.06 to 7.04, the recommended and supported path is to go from 6.06 -> 6.10 -> 7.04. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes

      If that's the case, it should be impossible to upgrade to 7.04 without upgrading to 6.10 first. That is, any attempt to upgrade to 7.04 on 6.06 will fall back to installing 6.10 and only then install 7.04. Anything less is just broken.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    31. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's funny though, their technique works, from a marketing perspective. Everyone hates on Debian for only making releases when it's truly stable, while Ubuntu, with its timely releases full of beta packages, has taken the Linux world by storm.

    32. Re:Damnit... by Markspark · · Score: 1

      and as a painfully knowing user, dont do this with debian sid neither, if you don't know what you're doing.. :D sometimes you'll mess things up when you're walking on the edge..

      --
      i find your lack of faith in science disturbing!
    33. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've purchased copies of Debian and Fedora from eBay because I can't be bothered downloading them, not because I didn't know they were free. I suspect this is the same reason for fair number of people who buy them.

    34. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or consider upgrading to Debian Testing/Unstable. Then you don't have to bother with the 6-month-reinstallation treadmill.

    35. Re:Damnit... by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      Linux for Humans.

      Which Humans?

      Geeks, Damnit!

    36. Re:Damnit... by fangorious · · Score: 1

      The GPL requires you provide source with your binaries, but most GPL'd Windows projects don't provide a source package...

      Actually it only requires that you provide source upon request to the people you've distributed binaries to. And it doesn't require free public downloads of the source. If you track who you've shipped binaries to, those are the only people you need to devlier source to when they ask you for it. And you can send the source via physical media, and charge for both the media and the shipping costs. You've just been spoiled by all the people who go the extra marthon and put out the source in a nice and tidy organized fashion complete with makefiles, for free, on a website or with the original binary distribution.

    37. Re:Damnit... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It's amazing the number of people who feel often compelled to post replies, even though they've obviously not even read the original comment in it's entirety.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    38. Re:Damnit... by alphamugwump · · Score: 1

      If you're really planning to do pro video editing with linux, you're either extremely misguided or out of your mind. When I start up cinelerra, the "pro" video app for linux, I'm told I need to run echo "0x7fffffff" > proc/kernel/shmax as root. Wtf? I try to open a video clip. It crashes. This stuff isn't stable. It isn't even beta, or alpha. This is pre-alpha software, being marketed as stable.

      To be fair, audio is ok, and blender is pretty good too. But steer clear of video, unless you're just trying to play or transcode it, because you won't get very far. Of course, Ubuntu studio may manage to stabilize the shifting mess of crap and make a solid distro, but I'm not very hopeful.

      For God's sake, stick with windows, man.

    39. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it. Logos and brands (Ubuntu, Kubuntu etc.) are copyrighted and not GPL for sure. You can't sell stuff using some other companies brands in it w/o written permission.

    40. Re:Damnit... by baadger · · Score: 1

      No you don't need to install SP1 before installing SP2, all Microsoft service packs are cumulative (it's why they get bigger).

    41. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are easily frightened. The vast overwhelming (and other unnecessary modifiers) majority of Ubuntu Edgy users had zero problems upgrading. And nearly none had any from a fresh install, which is what you are planning to do. That's what's up with that, dood.

      If you're serious about making Linux work for professional audio/video production, then you need to do some homework, young man. Do not cling to a wing and prayer with respect to "Distro X better work for me!" That's foolish. If you plan for your customers to trust you, you better get your hands dirty. Try some distros out. Y'know, TEST.

      Look, you can still use the case, mobo, drives, and memory for Windows Media Center if it will stop you from quaking in your boots and piddling on yourself. No one here can tell you with certainty if you're wasting your time or not, but based on your sophomoric FUD-hyping then I might venture that you probably are wasting *our* time. Installing and configuring Ubuntu is no harder or easier than OS X, depending on what it is you specifically want to do. Most basic tasks "just work." To find out if a given distro is ready for "primetime" then you need to stop crying long enough to take a crack at it. Y'know, TEST.

      There are several places you can find all the little problems you are not going to have with Ubuntu. One thing you can do is read wild anecdotes on Slashdot which are likely to have no relevant bearing to your upcoming explorations. Another thing you can do is ask any employee of Microsoft or Apple what they think the incredible difficulties of Ubuntu are that attract such a huge following. But, as you asked, these things won't matter, because you're predestined to give up before you even try much. Dual-monitor support has never been available on any platform, except closed-source operating systems which require the outlay of cash. Whatever you do, be sure not to TEST.

    42. Re:Damnit... by jonasj · · Score: 1

      That's how it works. The update manager will upgrade you from 6.06 to 6.10, and then from 6.10 to 7.04.

      --
      You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
    43. Re:Damnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When i moved from a clean Dapper install to Edgy beta, i did not had any problems. Most people with troubles were those using either blobs: (nvidia/ati) or some wifi cards. (Or failed to use the recommended upgrade method: sudo "update-manager -c")

      On the other hand, Ubuntu Studio is not released yet. And Feisty is BETA, it is not supposed to be stable just yet. Ubuntu Studio is made from Feisty, so you have to wait for the Feisty RELEASE, and then for the Ubuntu Studio release; and even so it will be the very first release which you should expect to improve with time.

    44. Re:Damnit... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      That's a very encyclopedic answer about the GPL. He wasn't asking whether he could resell GPL'd software, he was asking whether he could resell Ubuntu cds. You know, a trademarked distribution?

      Your rant about Windows OSS has zero bearing in reality. You clearly haven't installed cygwin, considering that getting the source is literally a single extra click in the installer.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    45. Re:Damnit... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Your rant about Windows OSS has zero bearing in reality.

      That might be true, if you weren't completely wrong.

      You clearly haven't installed cygwin, considering that getting the source is literally a single extra click in the installer.

      You're not paying attention. The INSTALLER itself is GPL'd, and it's considerably harder to find the source code for it on the website.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    46. Re:Damnit... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > The INSTALLER itself is GPL'd, and it's considerably harder to find the source code for it on the website.

      http://cygwin.com/setup/

      There used to be a source-only package for the cygwin installer. It seems to have vanished from the installer's list, so this was indeed tricky to track down again. This is a packaging bug for the installer, not a a conspiracy.

      As for clamwin and cdrdao, both of them are hosted on sourceforge.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    47. Re:Damnit... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Holy cow - it's been three months, and you haven't gotten that drive mounted on /home? I'm not on Ubuntu forums often, but for heaven's sake, email me if the other guy doesn't get back to you, and we'll get this straightened out.

      meanwhile, try this at your failsafe login (based on the fsck output early in the thread):
      sudo mount -L /home /home

      As an aside, I'm shocked at the low quality of some of the help up there. People just stabbing in the dark, rather than figuring out what's actually going on. It's the blind helping the blind...

    48. Re:Damnit... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I went Dapper->Edgy with no problems. Maybe it's my "professional sysadmin" skills that allowed me to correctly do the three steps involved in 1) change dapper to edgy in /etc/apt/sources.list 2) run sudo apt-get update 3) run sudo apt-get dist-upgrade...

      Just Kidding - there were some problems with the upgrade process for those who did it the first day (one of my machines included, though it wasn't a big deal). Those who waited a few weeks (including me on the other 5 machines) had no problems. This one should be better tested, but I'd still wait a couple of weeks before upgrading...

    49. Re:Damnit... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Well the most of the problems with upgrades, as evidenced by IRC && forum posts are caused by one of three things:

      #1. Problems with packages in universe/metaverse/restricted.
      #2. Problems with shitty/cheap/unpredictable hardware
      #3. Luser error. People who did lots of custom stuff to their OS before (ie compiled own kernels, installed nvidia driver using non-normal techniques, bypassed pkg manager for some software installation, or other stupid shit).

    50. Re:Damnit... by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Well, if you installed some stuff making it yourself, wouldn't you just want to make it again after installing the new headers that come with the next dist version? I have had to ./configure make && sudo make install a few things on this edgy box, and I expect I'll have to do the same thing after the upgrad e completes.

      Correct me if I'm completely off base here, I'm a relatively new linux user, but I can google my problems when I run into them (which has worked so far).

    51. Re:Damnit... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Well most of the problems stem from people doing their own custom stuff that's overwriting pkg manager stuff - say installing mythtv via pkg manager, then installing by compile. The compile will overwrite the binaries the pkg manager put into place (assuming the compile was pointing to the same location as the current myth install). Then when it comes time to upgrade, it breaks in spectacular ways. Then the user forgot they did this and they come seeking support in the forums, etc. When it doesn't work and support cannot help them, they blame it on linux.

      Sometimes it's that people have been messing around with the nvidia drivers because the distro supplied one is too old of a version for whatever reason. User downloads the nvidia one and compiles and installs it because he read the howto on the forums that fostered bad practices. Upgrade comes? Xorg fails to start because it's a new kernel. You try to compile the driver you download before. Doesn't work, why? New version of Xorg + new version of Kernel that the driver is incompatible with. Now you need to download another one. This gets blamed on linux.

      Yes, you certainly can do a ./configure, make, make install, but once you do so you are at the mercy of pagan non-package manager linux gods. There are some holes this stuff can dig that are too deep to consider digging yourself out of - especially over time. If you're smart (Smart in the sense that you've learned the lessons before, like I did in the ol' redhat days), you'll keep your custom stuff 100% separated and nowhere near your pkg manager area. E.g. mythtv in /usr/local/, etc. pkg managers don't touch /usr/local or anything under it.

      Heck, usually if glibc hasn't changed, you won't even need a recompile.

    52. Re:Damnit... by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      I suppose by now you have either solved the problem or given up, but I have replied to your thread.

    53. Re:Damnit... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      My "customers" only see the finished product, so they don't have to "trust me" during production.

      I'm only making a serious move to Linux (with one machine out of my 4 production systems) because my interest was piqued by reading comments about it in places like Slashdot. That, and I was severely shaken by a very ugly experience with Windows Vista Ultimate and a brand new machine. I expect the Ubuntu Studio box to be a TEST machine for a while, but I have to hope I'll get something useful from it.

      After reading most of the comments here and remembering that this story was about a beta release, I'm still looking forward to the experience, but I do worry about whether the use of Linux will give me a huge stick up my ass like you, AC.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    54. Re:Damnit... by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess if ppl get stuff really hosed up... The one that I don't understand your point on is nVidia drivers. There's no way to keep those separate, nor is there really any point to rm'ing them before installing a pkg manager version.. its all overwriting the same files, and the nVidia shell script (for the latest versions) doesn't come with an uninstall.

      In my case, I had to use a newer version than was in the edgy universe repos (or was that multiverse.. I don't know cuz I've always had both enabled to be able to do what I want with my box) so I d/l'd it from the nVidia website. When I upgraded to Feisty, I took a crack at the ones out of the "restricted drivers manager" and shazam, better performance out of my card than I had under edgy with the latest drivers....

      It never ceases to amaze me how well Ubuntu does when it gets things right (nor how hairy it gets when you're ahead of their curve). Also just did the same thing with ndiswrapper.. installed my custom made one's first, and its a kernel driver, so again no way to separate. Decided to take a crack at the new repo version, so I just reinstalled ye olde kernel image from synaptic (not bothering to reboot since it is the same kernel after all) rmmod'd my ndiswrapper, -r'd my driver, -i'd it, modprobed, and away it went (although it still fails to connect the first time it tries every time.... which was why I decided to try the repo version anyhow)

      Anyway I'm done rambling.. but yeah, maybe I'm one of the smart ones.

  4. I've been waiting for this one by rnmartinez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I must admit that Windows Vista almost got me. Its not even the eye candy, its just the thought of looking at something different from XP. I can't wait to go from 6.10 to 7.04, I've really enjoyed ubuntu since I siwtched to it from Debian. I hope that wireless and 3D is a bit easier in this release. I also heard that there is an applet that helps install media codecs, that should really come in handy too (Although I think easybuntu does this too)

    1. Re:I've been waiting for this one by fl!ptop · · Score: 5, Informative
      for restricted formats, this link is invaluable check out

      Restricted Formats
      for a neat wireless/lan/modem managment tool look here

      DebianAdmin.com
      --
      When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
    2. Re:I've been waiting for this one by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      It's different that easybuntu or automatix in that it's not a meta package to download the codecs. Instead, it's an interface that any other application can query when they are asked to open/run an unknown mime type. For example, the first time you try to open an MP3, your music player will ask gnome-app-install to download and install the codec required to play MP3 files. Same for WMV, DivX, etc.

      I've used it and it works very well, much better than the old "Unknown Mime type" error message that didn't even tell you what codec you needed. Easybuntu and Automatix should not be necessary anymore for proper media playback on Ubuntu.

      Oh, and Feisty automatically downloaded and installed the nVidia binary driver for me when I turned on 3D effects, flawless! It even downloaded and installed an updated binary driver when I upgraded my kernel! Feisty has made huge improvements in desktop usablity.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    3. Re:I've been waiting for this one by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out Sabayon. My friend at work showed me today; it comes with the Nvidia and ATI drivers and six or so different sessions available. Three customized KDE sessions, Gnome, Fluxbox, and something else. Comes with Beryl installed and configured too. I've fallen out of the Linux world recently but overall his first boot was looking much nicer than my fifth in Ubuntu trying to get everything up and working.

    4. Re:I've been waiting for this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must admit that Windows Vista almost got me. Its not even the eye candy, its just the thought of looking at something different from XP.

      Er, then yes, it is the eye candy. If you're considering upgrading for pointless reasons, you might as well be honest about it.

    5. Re:I've been waiting for this one by deviceb · · Score: 1

      my last 2 wireless cards has no support. thats my clincher. and XGL of course.

      --
      Kill your TV
    6. Re:I've been waiting for this one by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Wireless: NetworkManager, packed in gnome and kde, pops up a menu from the tray, pick a network, done
      Compiz (3D effects):After apt-get'ing drivers if necessary, System->Prefs->Desktop Effects, turn on
      Media codecs (or any file for that matter): Try to run the file, it pops up a box to install proper software. There is also now a restricted formats package that gets them all in one blow
      And if you didn't know about it already, you'll love the deskbar app in gnome

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    7. Re:I've been waiting for this one by fatboysmith · · Score: 0

      I installed Feisty on a R51 Thinkpad with a Broadcom 43XX wireless mini pci card. I finally gave up and dd'd my hdd img backup file back to the disk. As usual the BCM43XX module autoloaded and didn't work so I had to blacklist it. Then the ndiswrapper version that installed (1.9?) via apt had some strange issues. I know it's a lot of the problems with Linux & wireless are the fault of the hardware manufacturers, but this is one huge weakness with Linux in general vs. Windows. It reminds me of the pci modem issues when they first arrived on the scene back when. Bad news is Linux still has issues with some PCI modem chipsets. Automatix usually handles 3D and codecs particularly well (when the site is up..).

    8. Re:I've been waiting for this one by div_2n · · Score: 1

      I installed Herd 5 a couple of days ago (figures they would release the beta a couple of days after I install) and this tool rocks. I can't even describe how great it was to see it pop up a list of packages that would enable playback of a video I was trying to open. I didn't even know the tool was in there.

    9. Re:I've been waiting for this one by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      NeworkManager is nice, except when it's not. Right now, it breaks the RaLink 2500 drivers. This requires manually resetting the card with ifdow -> iwconfig -> ifup -> dhclient every time I reboot or wake. Kind of sucks, and I wouldn't be able to get around it if I didn't know more than a thing about Linux.

  5. new name, please! by fakeid · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's hard enough for me accept the name "Ubuntu", let alone their release names. I wonder if they could have a contest to actually make the version names somehow worse. I'm sure I would get a lot of street cred with the other IT guys when I tell them I run "Feisty Fawn". I'll have to make sure to wear my neckerchief...

    1. Re:new name, please! by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 3, Informative

      When most people refer to an Ubuntu release, they elide the noun. People running 6.10 usually refer to it as simply Edgy, not Edgy Eft. The previous release is commonly called Dapper, not Dapper Drake. So you can just call this one Feisty, or Ubuntu 7.04 if you prefer.

    2. Re:new name, please! by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's okay - the next release is 'Grungy Gerbil' - much more street cred.

    3. Re:new name, please! by AP2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just wait till the release after the next: Ubuntu Hungry Hippo

    4. Re:new name, please! by chebucto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about calling it 'Version 7', and forgoing the use of a code-name for a publicly-developed project? Though, I must say 'Feisty Fawn' is better than some of the other zany names they've used. Hoary Hedgehog and Dapper Drake are especially lame.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    5. Re:new name, please! by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's hard enough for me accept the name "Ubuntu", let alone their release names. I wonder if they could have a contest to actually make the version names somehow worse. I'm sure I would get a lot of street cred with the other IT guys when I tell them I run "Feisty Fawn". I'll have to make sure to wear my neckerchief...

      Are you running the "Stoned Beaver" "Out of Detox" or "Feisty Dunnart" kernel?

      (in other words, code names suck, but there is no way around them)

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    6. Re:new name, please! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Because it's not version 7. 7.04 refers the target release date, 2007-04. 7.10 will confuse the hell out of everyone you convince to call it version 7.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    7. Re:new name, please! by solafide · · Score: 1, Informative
      'elide' is the first word I've ever seen on /. that I didn't know the definition for.

      For reference:

      elide

      1a. To omit or slur over (a syllable, for example) in pronunciation. b. To strike out (something written).
      2a. To eliminate or leave out of consideration. b. To cut short; abridge.

      [from the AHD]
    8. Re:new name, please! by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      I'll have to make sure to wear my neckerchief...

      I'd think that your customers might be more concerned about that hippy and the talking dog that follows you around in that weird green van you drive.

      Yeah, yeah -- I know you like to call it an "ascot" ...

    9. Re:new name, please! by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      But you can say to all your other smooove Linux dudes, "Hey Dapper Drakes, lets go out and find some Fiesty Fawns!"

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    10. Re:new name, please! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      (in other words, code names suck, but there is no way around them)

      You could code-name things after, like, towns. Or mountains. Or lakes, or rivers, or prophets, or books, or characters in a book, or something.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    11. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those linux code releases are far more entertaining. I'm currently running
      "Nocturnal Monster Puppy" - linux 2.6.21-RC4 GIT release

    12. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      FYI, it's the root of ellipsis.

    13. Re:new name, please! by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Hoary Hedgehog and Dapper Drake are especially lame.

      No, that would go to "Edgy Eft". What the eff is an eft?

      (yes, I do actually know what an eft is, that's not the point)

      The trend is increasing toward version numbers now. Ubuntu's version of "stable" is 6.06LTS, and neither "Dapper" nor "Drake" appear on the page, just an appended "LTS" (for "Long Term Support").

      You still need the adjective for apt repository names though.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    14. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one after that is Horny Hamster. I think Incestual Iguanas will be better though...

    15. Re:new name, please! by plopez · · Score: 1

      Yeah a sure way to make distro popular is to give it stripper names, Destinie, Candi, Randi, Angel, Bambi does it disturb anyone that Bambi was a boy?) etc. I can't wait for the instructional videos.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    16. Re:new name, please! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      or prophets


      Name your distro release "Mal-2" or "Omar Ravenhurst", and I might have a look at it.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    17. Re:new name, please! by jeevesbond · · Score: 1

      It's hard enough for me accept the name "Ubuntu", let alone their release names.

      You should listen to this FLOSS weekly then. Apparently they have a dance for each release (Dapper, Edgy, Feisty etc.), the dance for the Breezy Badger release was taken directly from badgerbadgerbadger.com

      Shuttleworth and crew got up in front of a cinema full of people to do their Badger Dance. Anyone got links to them performing any of these dances? I found the Warty Warthog dance, but it's a bit lame.

      --
      I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
    18. Re:new name, please! by ady1 · · Score: 1

      I'll have to make sure to wear my neckerchief... Could be the next release name: Neckerchief Chowchow.


      p.s don't try to decode it. I made it up entirely.
    19. Re:new name, please! by trawg · · Score: 1

      Code names are fine - there's absolutely no problem with using them, as long as they're not used as the official terminology. I don't want to have to try to figure out if "Feisty Fawn" is a more recent distribution than "Oscar Ox" - though I believe since a couple releases ago, each new version is just based on the next letter of the alphabet, which goes some way to alleviating the problem - but unless you know that, there's a lot of WTF.

      I just want a version number so I can look at it and go "yes, that's a bigger number than I'm aware of previously, so it must be a new version". I also don't want to have to remember two things that map to the same thing. Just describe it with a version number, which is long standing convention in software, or stick to the stupid word naming system - pick one!

    20. Re:new name, please! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of VIA's Samuel, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther and Isaiah cores. Although I guess those are books of the Bible, not prophets.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    21. Re:new name, please! by Misao · · Score: 1

      I don't think he did; while admittedly sense (3) usually refers to a sound (eliding an 's' for example), sense (2) fits nicely. Certainly I think most people knew what he meant (which is the point of communication, after all).

      -mis

    22. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a chill pill, man. About the names - go to http://releases.ubuntu.com/6.06/ and note the title of the page. Notice anything? Like, say, a cheesy name for an operating system? That would only be there if it were being used as part of the official terminology. So, like, the first poster was right and you were just vindictive. Jeeze.

      PS - About the 'slashdork' comment: Takes one to know one.

    23. Re:new name, please! by Door+in+Cart · · Score: 1

      How about calling it 'Version 7', and forgoing the use of a code-name for a publicly-developed project? My gut reaction is the same as yours; "Feisty Fawn" sounds like a children's product, and I'll stick with Slackware, thank you very much. But as far as most normal people are concerned, cutesy childish names (viz. Google and Yahoo!) are apparently attractive. Ubuntu has gained a lot of popularity over their competitors, and I'd wager that their approach of treating it as a children's product is an important factor.
    24. Re:new name, please! by MadJo · · Score: 1

      Technically there will be 2 version 7's then... one in April and one in October.

    25. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a bug, that's a feature!

    26. Re:new name, please! by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Go to the ubuntu.com page. Note that it shows "Ubuntu 6.06 LTS" and "Ubuntu 6.10". The codenames are not used upon release.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    27. Re:new name, please! by Daffy+Duck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. Ellipsis is from Greek elleipsis. Elide is from Latin laedere.

    28. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phabulous Philly
      Antagonistic Anteater?
      Serendipitous Stallion?
      Antidisestablishmentarian Aardvark?

    29. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The number of 'l's should have told me that one. D'oh. At least I've unlearned a false (and stupid) assumption. Thanks.

    30. Re:new name, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The books were written by the particular prophet, thus the book was named after the prophet. So yes, they are names of books and prophets.

    31. Re:new name, please! by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      Omit does work better, but I'd say definition 2 of elide works too.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    32. Re:new name, please! by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      My gut reaction is the same as yours; "Feisty Fawn" sounds like a children's product, and I'll stick with Slackware, thank you very much.

            From what I can see, it's a philosophical tribute to his native Afican animals, which is serious stuff.

            From a description of Slackware on Linuxforums, the creator is quoted as answering why he had no code names as that there was no need for them.

            There's lots of described philosophical differences between Ubuntu and Slackware. Children's product isn't one of them though.

        rd

    33. Re:new name, please! by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Just describe it with a version number, which is long standing convention in software, or stick to the stupid word naming system - pick one!

            They do both. I wouldn't want to figure out the order of Hoary, Dapper, Edgy, Feisty, etc. either. That's what the version numbers are for.

        rd

    34. Re:new name, please! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure Esther counts as a prophet. Also, I think there was a I Samuel and a II Samuel. But no Job. Hm.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  6. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm.... I think that's a little off-color.

  7. still a long way to go by eobanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    still a long way to go in terms of usability. A friend of mine recently installed 6.10 for the first time. He's basically never used Linux before. I briefly explained how to use Synaptic. He got the hang of things for a while, but then he interrupted a dpkg process when Synaptic was running by hitting the power button. I have no idea why he did this, but you probably know what happened...he tried to run Synaptic later on and it said 'you have to run dpkg update -a to fix these errors!' or something along those lines. Big mistake number one: it told the user to type in commands at the shell. Big mistake number two: it didn't tell him to use sudo.

    He was immediately stuck. He even figured out how to access the shell, but he didn't understand why it kept saying that he needed superuser privileges to continue. The problem with these kinds of things is that if even one little glitch happens like this, the user gets stuck and then usually gives up and goes back to Windows. It has to be perfect. It has to be flawless. Or else it won't attract brand new users.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:still a long way to go by LiENUS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Windows has those same issues, ever gotten the error message about the registry size being too small? How long do you think it takes a user to figure that one out on their own? Plus Ubuntu has great user support on irc.freenode.net in #ubuntu.

    2. Re:still a long way to go by Oriumpor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cause a user never has had a corrupt office install and had to call on their sixpack of beer a fix friend to hack their registry and reinstall office.

      Shit happens, but yeah there should be an automated system to solve package issues. The brilliant bit is, you can submit a feature request to the ubuntu team and it might actually get implimented.

    3. Re:still a long way to go by stim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its not really a long way to go. Ubuntu has already gotten way more usable and intuitive than Windows is or ever will be (try walking a noob though a registry edit). The thing is there is a double standard when it comes to linux, and that is that it needs to be perfect. Linux is and always be a work in progress, allways changing to incorporate the newest and greatest thing. This will always leave some little quarks in some of the process. It probably should have just put sudo in front in the error message, but do we in IT really have such a strong desire to completely phase ourselves out of end user support? In other words, GET YOUR HANDS OUT MY POCKETS!

      --
      Browse at -1 to keep an eye out for abuses.
    4. Re:still a long way to go by Knara · · Score: 4, Funny

      Er... yeah, cuz Windows *never* gives cryptic error messages.

    5. Re:still a long way to go by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It has to be perfect. It has to be flawless.

      That better not be true, because it's impossible. But we know that it it isn't true - Mac OS X and Windows Vista are far from flawless, and yet people still manage to muddle their way through using those systems. In fact, lots of people manage to use Ubuntu right now even with a couple of bugs.

      The fact that it neither recovers in that situation nor gives the "correct" command to recover is legitimately a serious problem - I hope you filed a bug on it - but it shouldn't seriously prevent anyone from being able to use the system. Pasting any chunk of the error message into google gives the answer, as does asking anyone who knows anything about Ubuntu directly.

      Switching to any different operating system will be non-trivial, unless someone else is administering it. There's no way around that, however much people trying to switch to various Linux distros demand that it not be so. Ubuntu is well beyond the point where anyone can easily use it if they are willing to slog through the difficulties of learning the basics of a new system - and no new system can ever be significantly better than that.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    6. Re:still a long way to go by jbeaupre · · Score: 0

      Sadly, you're right. Seems all the distros can only be maintained and upgraded by command line ... if (1) you know the commands and (2) are comfortable using commands. I include "comfortable" because even if you write down what to do for grandma, if she's scared to do it, she won't. But worse, most of us forget the correct commands or syntax.

      I'm surprised no one has created a GUI script runner that can be trusted (or maybe they have and I haven't heard of it). Go to the "New Program" icon, click a few times and you've got a new application installed via shell command in the background (maybe from a static list, maybe linking to one online, maybe some other method). Go to the "Maintenence" icon, click a few times, and you've got things patched or whatever. If you have to type anything more than a password during any part, folks will forget what to do and Grandma ain't gonna do it.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    7. Re:still a long way to go by skeftomai · · Score: 1

      That's what Google is there for :)

    8. Re:still a long way to go by Danse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cause a user never has had a corrupt office install and had to call on their sixpack of beer a fix friend to hack their registry and reinstall office.

      The thing is, everyone knows someone who's pretty good with Windows and can help them with their problems. Five minutes with Google usually does the trick. How many people know a linux geek to help them with that? Probably not nearly as many. So, linux remains a daunting prospect for people who don't know who they can turn to for help.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    9. Re:still a long way to go by majortom1981 · · Score: 1

      He is right. Windows most of the time can be just rebooted or nuse a restore point. Linux if there is a rpoblem you have to type in commands. A normal non pwoer user wont know what to do.

    10. Re:still a long way to go by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The difference is that Windows fixed that problem. XP and later have no registry size limit.

      And here's a tip that really should be a clue-batting, but I'm feeling nice: telling end users to use IRC for help is the dumbest fucking thing you can do. And for the record--with a few exceptions, the people in #ubuntu are dumb as a box of rocks. Completely useless for almost any questions. (This is not a slight against the half-dozen helpful people on the channel--just the 400+ who suck.)

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    11. Re:still a long way to go by mhall119 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Congratulations, you've just invented Synaptic.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    12. Re:still a long way to go by Medieval_Gnome · · Score: 1

      At the very least the ubuntu people have taken care of the issues you've noted.

      In ubuntu, there's an add/remove option in the Applications menu, and it gives a nice user-friendly interface to installing software.

      As for updates, it automatically checks every night for them and will display an icon in the status bar and pop up a bubble saying there are updates for your computer.

      --

      :wq

    13. Re:still a long way to go by manno · · Score: 1

      ever gotten the error message about the registry size being too small No, I can honestly say in all my time of using windows computers, and working on them(far to many MSPC's to count) I have never seen that message. For the most part Windows isn't that bad, and I find it a lot more polished, and easier to use that Ubuntu that's for sure.

      I use Ubuntu, exclusively at home now, I have been for a year. I get caught on snags in it EVERYWHERE. For some reason every so often after logging in it doesn't detect mouse clicks, unless I reboot. Synaptic is buggy I still have "pending updates" that refuse to update, and don't go away after they have failed to install over 10 times now. Programs constantly crash on me, Firefox seemingly does so on an hourly basis. Maybe it's my hardware, I don't know, I'm not going back to Windows, but I think some people look at Linux through rose colored glasses.

      $0.02,
      -manno
    14. Re:still a long way to go by infinityxi · · Score: 1

      1998 called, they want their console-is-the-only-solution method back. Have you ever USED ubuntu?

      --
      Turn based strategy game that runs over XMPP. Phalanx
    15. Re:still a long way to go by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what the status of that bug is in 7.04, but it seems to me that saying a new version has a long way to go because an old version sucked is just a little bit silly.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    16. Re:still a long way to go by shadowrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? what is grandma doing that the default install and automatic updates of Ubuntu are not sufficient for her?

      She needs the latest Xorg code? She wants to be on the bleeding edge of compositing managers? She's just dying to try out some new bayesian spam filters in her Postfix install? She hates postfix and called you because she's having a bitch of a time installing Qmail? She can't quite get Wow running under wine?

      I have a dapper install at home and aside from xorg.conf or smb.conf, i find the built in GUI tool fine for everything. If your grandma is calling you for scripts to help her access windows shares on other machines, Linux just might be for her. Otherwise, Office, email, web browsing, it's all right there and easily configured through GUI menus

    17. Re:still a long way to go by delire · · Score: 1

      That's a fairly obscure situation, and so can hardly be used for generalising the state of Ubuntu's useability overall. Nonetheless, the issue itself is an important one (especially the lacking sudo instruction). Now that you've witnessed it you'd do well to register a bug report.. better still, teach your friend how to do it and why it's important.

      Problems like these don't wilt and die on their own. They have to be noticed, you have to point the torch at such things and tell other people to come and have a look. Think of all the annoyances in Windows or OS X that go on unnattended year on year. Linux presents a rare opportunity to actually do something about these things simply by letting the people that really want to hear about it, know about it.

      Few people seem to realise that registering bugs is crucial to the development of this operating system. More so, registering bugs isn't about 'giving' your time so much as saving time in future: a rational fullfilment of pure self-interest that happens to benefit many others simultaneously.

    18. Re:still a long way to go by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Windows is built to magically "fix itself" in a couple cases where Ubuntu wouldn't, but I've found that systems that magically fix themselves sometimes also can magically break themselves.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    19. Re:still a long way to go by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Try hard powering off Windows when it's half way through a service pack or security update, see how well Windows deals with it.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    20. Re:still a long way to go by Kjella · · Score: 1

      While I don't mean to insult, if you've ever done a hard reboot in the middle of a Windows update you'd know that's a good way to end up with a broken or even unbootable system. Granted, it should have been handled much better, but that's hardly the worst example I've heard. The biggest step 1 would be getting hardware where everything works out of the box in the first place, that's always a killer for people trying to install it on random hardware...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    21. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is and always be a work in progress, allways changing to incorporate the newest and greatest thing. This will always leave some little quarks in some of the process.

      Yes they make incremental progress, so it is a quantum development model.

      I'll be here all week. Make sure you tip the waitress!

    22. Re:still a long way to go by karnal · · Score: 1

      Come on.

      If you think it MIGHT be your hardware, look into that. Seriously. It's possible (I'd give it 60/40) that it's your hardware or something outside of the OS's control. I once (back in the day) installed ECC memory into a box that clearly was non-ECC. That was an interesting couple of days before I realized why things were crashing inconsistently....

      Run Memtest - heck, it's right on your Ubuntu boot cd! If that shows no errors for a pass or two, find something that's CPU intensive and run it for a while (sorry, don't know what you'd run in Linux to do this...) Or open up your box and make sure the heatsink is (mounted) on the processor properly etc.

      --
      Karnal
    23. Re:still a long way to go by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're both right. It needs to be better and it can't be perfect.

      Here's my take on the particular situation the OP brought up.

      1. telling the user about the problem
      1A. it can detect the problem well enough to tell the user what needs to be done... so why doesn't it just ask if it is ok to do that and then do it itself so the user doesn't have to figure out how to type in a command.
      1B. if 1A is too much work then at least tell the user "you will need to type this in a window; you get the window by...."

      2. telling the user about privilege
      2A. It should, tell the user his account doesn't have the privilege necessary...
      2B. It should tell the user in words a newbie is most likely to understand, not "you need to be superuser" or something similar but "you will need administrator privileges to do this; here is how you can get them for the purpose of running this command". Administrator is a plain English word whose plain English meaning is exactly right for this context.

      I know, it is a PITA to explain every last thing to newbies, but if you aren't willing to put the effort in to do that then you will never win over new users... they will hit something like this, throw their hands up in the air and go back to something more familiar - whatever that is. That's human nature, it isn't going to change, you have two choices: get used to it and work around it or give up. That's all there is to it.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    24. Re:still a long way to go by pkulak · · Score: 1

      I used to think Ubuntu sucked too. Then I bought a new power supply.

    25. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - I just converted from PCLOS to Kubuntu 6.10. 'Add/Remove Programs' crashes often. Adept got stuck installing VMWare Player, because the install pops up a "READEME" file. Of course, you can't interact with it from Adept, so it hangs.

      I had to go to the command line to fix that one. I couldn't believe there wasn't a simple button to take care of that. (And I had to *reboot* in order to release the lock!)

      You could argue that's not a Ubuntu issue, but having to intervene at the command line *is* a usability issue. Installing *does* fail (for many reasons), and it's a common occurrence. There should be an easy way for newbies to deal with it.

      Setting 'Multiverse' as an option required knowing that I had to add 'multiverse' to a line of text. Again, this should be a point and click sort of thing. Don't tell me that it's aimed at admins only, because ordinary folk are the ones who have to administer their boxes.

      Bottom line: there's still a lot of fiddling that could (and should) be removed before I'm comfortable handing this over to my parents to use.

    26. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but he read about linux once in his Vista users support group... I think they meet in the same room right after the colon cancer people.

    27. Re:still a long way to go by TheMeuge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really? Cause 5 minutes on Google is what it took me to fix EVERY major issue with Ubuntu I've had thus far, and I have no Linux geek to turn to for help...

    28. Re:still a long way to go by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'd say hardware is your #1 issue. I've got some pretty wacky and offbrand hardware in some of my machines and the don't have problems like that unless something is failing. I had one problem when installing Easyubuntu that gave me a weird versioning error with KDM but that was resolved in this last batch of updates. The only other problem I have is with my wireless card in my main desktop disconnecting after it's been idle for awhile. I'm apt to believe that it's the funky Broadcom chip in it or perhaps some config issue.

    29. Re:still a long way to go by doti · · Score: 1

      Synaptic later on and it said 'you have to run dpkg update -a to fix these errors!' Instead of saying that, why don't it offer a button to run this corrective action? It already has root privileges.
      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    30. Re:still a long way to go by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unbuntu to powerful for your old one?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    31. Re:still a long way to go by nschubach · · Score: 1

      sorry, don't know what you'd run in Linux to do this...
      Folding@Home. In fact, a single WU version should be put on every Linux build for testing purposes! ;)
      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    32. Re:still a long way to go by nschubach · · Score: 1

      It just says (in a not so elegant fashion) "Your program crashed. Click here to send us your crash info and restart your program. Thank you for using Windows!"

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    33. Re:still a long way to go by Pausanias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that he told the newbie to use Synaptic at all. Synaptic is not the right tool for newbies. This is the mistake experts make when trying to "help" their friends learn Linux: they tell their friends how to do things the complicated way, and then when their friends can't figure it out, they conclude that linux isn't ready for prime time.

      The proper way for a newbie to install software is Add/Remove programs right off the ubuntu menu... just like in fracking Windows, for Pete's sake.

    34. Re:still a long way to go by nschubach · · Score: 1

      That's been my problem with most Linux apps when they say they want to steal Windows users. Windows users don't know what a command prompt is and never want to see one. You need to provide the buttons/actions/sequences to try to recover from these situations. If you don't want to clutter up the interface run the command when the error happens if you know the command is "safe". Instead, you force the user to the command prompt or a support forum. That is too much work for most people. Code in circumstances to account for endless loops, setup a process to recover instead of adding new features. Then again, I'm from the school that wants to make things work before giving it to the marketing group.

      I have a friend that sends out group emails and two of us never get these emails. We are both on Gmail and I almost laughed when Gmail Support asked me to have him get header info from those emails. (Spam filters were not getting these emails either and I've tried adding him to a filter) People don't want to do extra work like this. In his mind, he never got a response from the server and the rest of the people got the email. It's not his problem. Period. There are a lot of people like this.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    35. Re:still a long way to go by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The problem with these kinds of things is that if even one little glitch happens like this, the user gets stuck and then usually gives up and goes back to Windows. It has to be perfect. It has to be flawless. Or else it won't attract brand new users.


      Windows Vista and MacOS X aren't flawless. To attract new users, it needs a compelling reason to switch, or to get into a position to be people's introduction to computing without giving them a compelling reason to switch away from it.

      The second is unlikely on its own without someone giving away a bunch of Linux-powered PCs. So, its the killer app that is needed, not a flawless experience (you need a good enough experience, given the competition, or people won't stick, but "good enough" and "flawless" aren't the same.)
    36. Re:still a long way to go by PitaBred · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Given that you can't even type a few free-form sentences reliably, I have no doubt that the command line strikes fear deep in your heart

    37. Re:still a long way to go by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I ran into issues that would take a couple of days to track down solutions for, but they were typically not anything that a newbie would be doing anyway.

      Like trying to find out why I kept ending up with header mismatches when installing Compiz. Using Envy solved that problem in seconds, once I finally found a reference to it.

      One of the things that I'd like to see in the default browser page for *any* installed OS, is a users guide to getting the most out of search engines. Sometimes even those of us who have taken the time to add logic to our searches still have to stumble through pages and pages of crap. Imagine how daunting it must be to someone who doesn't really know which of the the first hundred or so links Google returns to them is actually relevant, and not like that damned blog-tutorials site that collects random newsgroup posts and sticks adsense ads on them.

      If a new user can find an easy way to learn, they just might :)

    38. Re:still a long way to go by caudron · · Score: 1

      So in a thread about the beta of the next version of Ubuntu, you chime in that it isn't ready, citing as proof a problem your friend had with the /previous/ version of the software whilst doing something that could hose /any/ Windows OR Linux system (power down interruption of an install)?

      And you got modded "Insightful"?

      Perhaps moderators thought it said "Inciteful". Otherwise, as much as I appreciate your comment as valid for what it was discussing, this mod makes no damn sense.

      Seriously? Tell your friend to power down like that while a Windows app is writing to the registry (hint: this occurs more than just at install time!) and watch what happens next. Voila! Instant "non-perfection"! We don't need perfection to get people to use Linux. We need people to stop pirating Windows. If A person has to spend $200 to get the latest version, they will be more inclined to consider a switch. If their techie buddy wil just hand em a copy for free, they wil just sit back and bitch that Linux ain't perfect enough, as if Windows were.

      Tom Caudron
      http://tom.digitalelite.com/

      --
      -Tom
    39. Re:still a long way to go by Danse · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really? Cause 5 minutes on Google is what it took me to fix EVERY major issue with Ubuntu I've had thus far, and I have no Linux geek to turn to for help...

      5 minutes for you. My mom wouldn't even begin to know what to search for. I'm talking about the friend that knows how to fix stuff. He could find the answer pretty quick and know what to look for in the hits so that he doesn't end up in some ad portal hell.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    40. Re:still a long way to go by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      he tried to run Synaptic later on and it said 'you have to run dpkg update -a to fix these errors!' or something along those lines. Big mistake number one: it told the user to type in commands at the shell. Big mistake number two: it didn't tell him to use sudo.

      The thing is, everyone knows someone who's pretty good with Windows and can help them with their problems. Five minutes with Google usually does the trick.

      When I put dpkg superuser Ubuntu into Google and hit "I'm feeling lucky", it took me straight to a page where somebody had exactly the same problem and was shown exactly what to do, with a link to a tutorial as well.

      How is "five minutes with Google" not enough in the Ubuntu case?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    41. Re:still a long way to go by miro+f · · Score: 1

      multiverse has (for a long time) been available from within the "repositories" configuration within synaptic, as is being able to read that README file that pops up (if the package is set up correctly, it should pop it up in a proper window, otherwise clicking "details" will show it.

      Of course, I haven't tried adept but I thought KDE was supposed to be the "easy to configure" one? ;)

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    42. Re:still a long way to go by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      I'm using Ubuntu right now. There is a little thing called "Software Sources" or something in my "System", "Administration" menue. I don't know where it would be in KDE though. But the point is, it has five checkboxes. One of them is for the Multiverse (it actually says something about software restricted by legal or copyright, and then has 'multiverse' in braces, but hey). The others are for the other repositories (including source).

      Ubuntu 6.10 with GNOME. I don't think I even had to install that one.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    43. Re:still a long way to go by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      find something that's CPU intensive and run it for a while (sorry, don't know what you'd run in Linux to do this...)
      Compile something big, like KDE, GNOME, OpenOffice, or the kernel. Doesn't have to produce anything useful, since all you want is a stress-test. Just pull up a console, then run these commands:
      sudo apt-get build-dep $huge-program
      sudo apt-get source $huge-program
      cd $huge-program
      ./configure
      make
      Or, (potential flame), run emacs :)
      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    44. Re:still a long way to go by mrsmiggs · · Score: 1

      It's not just like Windows, it's even easier than Windows you don't even have to go out and find the programs you want, they're right there. With Click and Run in the next release they appear to be trying to make it even easier.

    45. Re:still a long way to go by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      And I think I know how we (and that's a big fat "we") could fix that.
      Just have a nice, friendly "Request Geek" button.
      People that know what they're doing (possibly screened out by a test) just sign up, and when someone hits the "Request Geek" button, it hooks up the confused user with one of these more knowledgeable people via Jabber (or $INSERT_PROTOCOL), and kindly walks them through the problem (preferably without any RTFM's or console commands if possible. Make it easy on the brave souls.).

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    46. Re:still a long way to go by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1A. it can detect the problem well enough to tell the user what needs to be done... so why doesn't it just ask if it is ok to do that and then do it itself so the user doesn't have to figure out how to type in a command

      That is something I have always wondered about Synaptic and the dpkg -i ??'xxasdf issue, he tells *me* to do it, and it is the first thing to try... why dont it just *do it*... it is not for security reasons (it already has the gksudo credentials)! just fucking do it!, if it does not fix the problem then throw the error message and be done with it.

      Oh, and the other think I do not like is that the error messages are usually "hidden" in some text file. It would be better if there was some kind of big red screen telling the user there was an error and not die silently (and write something the logfile, or worst yet, coredump).

      I like Ubuntu, I use it in a secondary machine I got from the thrash... granted I almost dont use it (I tried installing in my notebook but not all the hardware worked), I will give version 7 a try but I am sure there will be some issue (with Linux there is always an issue).

      By the way, why is it 7.04 ? why not just 7? that, and as other people already said, what with the gay naming? it is okay if developers want to name it as they want while they are doing it, but I hard a hard time remembering the name of the 6 release, and then it was not 6 but 6.06 !!!! it is difficult to find help to some specific issues (specially for newbies) if you have such weird and inconsistent names...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    47. Re:still a long way to go by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Flamebait? Jesus, the slashbots are out in force today.

      I'm an open-source contributor. I run a Linux network. I use Kubuntu. That doesn't change its flaws, you fucking moron mods.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    48. Re:still a long way to go by happy*nix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, I know what you mean. I had to reload a PC from scratch for a gut who accidently kicked the power on his PC during a SP2 update.

      WTF!
      Ubuntu is not perfect. No argument here.

      If you want to screw up your computer (HPUX, AIX, MacOSX, Windows*,Linux, Palm, your Cell phone) kill the power when its updating itself. No a guarenteed foobar, but still a dumb idea.

      --
      Gone to my happy place.
    49. Re:still a long way to go by loconet · · Score: 1

      Sooner or later his friend may have needed to use Synaptic. There are many useful things that are not available through the the Add/Remove list.

      --
      [alk]
    50. Re:still a long way to go by Mex · · Score: 1

      Good luck accessing Google when your Ubuntu install is hosed...

      Please don't be nasty to us new users.

    51. Re:still a long way to go by Mex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the issue is not to point at the other guy. The issue is to make sure Ubuntu is *better* than that guy.

      I think comparisons to Windows are really detrimental. Ubuntu should be in another league.

    52. Re:still a long way to go by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Reboots works most of the time but man I really hate it when they do. I hate it because the root problem hasn't been nailed, and I hate it because it's something that I shouldn't have to do. Firefox aside, all apps under my current ubuntu are flawlessly stable and could run indefinately. I love it. Head over to a windows forum or macfixit and every other post says "reboot".

    53. Re:still a long way to go by urbanRealist · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I just did an install of Debian testing using the minimal CD. I de-selected the desktop, leaving only the basic OS selected. I then built a system with "apt-get install kde" and a few others. I had a few problems, but fives minutes or less with Google did the trick every time.

      --
      I've seen a lot of things, but I've never been a witness.
    54. Re:still a long way to go by laparel · · Score: 1

      Just ignore the phrase "...as a box of rocks" mods. Oh, and lay off the caffine

    55. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      By the way, why is it 7.04 ? why not just 7?
      April, 2007
    56. Re:still a long way to go by laparel · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu has already gotten way more usable and intuitive than Windows is or ever will be

      Not yet... not yet, In some aspects perhaps, but as OS in its entirety and ease-of-use, newbies (the moms and pops, or the myspace users market :P) would definitely prefer windows over ubuntu.

    57. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never fails to amaze me how much crap people are willing to put up with from their Windoze systems. I have friends whose systems are slow, buggy, crash from time to time (yes, I give you that XP is light years better than any 9x) & likely compromised by all kinds of malware. Many have illegal copies that constantly nag & cut them off from security upgrades.There are still lots of simple things they do not know how to do. Would they consider switching to an operating system that would free them from all these hassles, not on your life. On the other hand, I know a couple who took a chance on Linux three years ago. The original computer I set up, a not so hot Debian hack, has been in constant use for three years. Most of that time by their teenage daughter, who chats with her friends (AMSN), Does her homework (OpenOffice), rips cds (RipperX), collects tunes for her portable player (Limewire), surfs the net (Firefox) with practically no support from me. They recently added a "new" p3 I set up running PCLinuxOS. Their 12 year old son recently installed a webcam and was able to get it working all on his own and only need help from me & his parents to adjust the firewall rules to get it working on AMSN. His parents wisely keep the root password to themselves. For those willing to make the adjustment, I'd say Linux, at least certain versions of it, has arrived.

    58. Re:still a long way to go by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

      That's what the LiveCD is for.

    59. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about

      0. fixing apt so that you can't break it by interrupting the install process (i.e. use transactions with roll-back)

    60. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper way for a newbie to install software is Add/Remove programs right off the ubuntu menu... just like in fracking Windows, for Pete's sake.

      And what would happen if this newbie hit the power button in the middle of an Add/Remove Programs operation?

      I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing that the end result would have been identical...
    61. Re:still a long way to go by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      It has to be perfect. It has to be flawless. Or else it won't attract brand new users.

            First of all, how many of these users installed Windows themselves flawlessly? Not a recovery, an install on new hardware with a purchased copy of Windows. Few to none that must be "attracted".

            Secondly, they can buy a Linux PC over the internet as easily as from Dell or Gateway. Whether they have a compelling reason to do so is a different issue, but pre-installed Windows should be compared to pre-installed Linux for fairness.

        rd

    62. Re:still a long way to go by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      If you think it MIGHT be your hardware, look into that.

            The acid test would be for him to install Windows over Linux on the same hardware. It'd be interesting to se how "flawless" the Windows install is, and the subsequent behavior.

            It's actually the only relevant comparison to make.

        rd

    63. Re:still a long way to go by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Windows users don't know what a command prompt is and never want to see one.

            When I had a problem with Roadrunner the help desk instructed me to bring up the command window and type a command.

            Windows users are people. Sheesh, they can type a command without freaking out.

        rd

    64. Re:still a long way to go by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      We need people to stop pirating Windows.

            Bill said he would take care of that.

    65. Re:still a long way to go by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Adept is an abortion. There's not a lot else to say about it.

      Synaptic is decent, but adept is just bad.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    66. Re:still a long way to go by Kijori · · Score: 1

      While the code name system is admittedly a little random, the version numbering is quite logical: year.month. Feisty will be 7.04 because it will be released in April 2007, the fourth month of the '7th' year. Releases are normally 6 months apart (exception being made for versions designed for long term support, like Dapper Drake. So the next release (Grumpy Groundhog) will probably be 7.10.

    67. Re:still a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that it's just too easy for a newbie to install a package under Ubuntu,and even easier to break one installation...

    68. Re:still a long way to go by jernejk · · Score: 1

      He even figured out how to access the shell, but he didn't understand why it kept saying that he needed superuser privileges to continue Ehem... how far is it from this point to... "Ubuntu needs your permissions to continue... Cancel or Allow?"
    69. Re:still a long way to go by johansalk · · Score: 1

      You forgot about that "This Program Has Performed an Illegal Operation and Will Be Shut Down" that used to spook me out when I first started using napster.

    70. Re:still a long way to go by stim · · Score: 1

      Yeah your right, but those moms and pops and myspace users all know at least one quasi technical person who tells them that rhederic about it not being 'quiet ready' , i actively convert 'newbies' to linux especially if they have no computer knowledge. The learning curve for general use is perfectly fine in ubuntu, and they end up calling waaaay less with problems. Microsoft has done this awesome job of insisting on this not being the case, and even people who know better cant help but spout out that that crap. windows is absolutely crap, and end users hate it. they hate paying people to clean spyware, they hate re-installing thier OS's. They want to surf the web and watch cartoons.

      --
      Browse at -1 to keep an eye out for abuses.
    71. Re:still a long way to go by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this quite a few times. An error comes up and tells me to run a different program or go the the command line to fix it. Definitely a usability issue, but everything is certainly easier than ten years ago, mostly.

      I say mostly because with HAL, everything works great and it's easy, except when it isn't. I left Win98 completely because I was tired of rebooting to a system that had changed, sometimes into an unworkable state. Ubuntu is rapidly approaching this situation. It used to be that everything was a bitch to set up, but it never broke or changed once you had it all correct. You could forget about your box for years. Not anymore. Network Manager currently screws my static network setup regularly, and I have to go back to editing everything by hand every time. Welcome back to "Plug and Pray."

    72. Re:still a long way to go by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I wrote something about that in my journal right after 6.06 came out: download a .deb from anywhere, double click on it, type in your password, and finish the installation. It was too easy!

    73. Re:still a long way to go by Macka · · Score: 1

      That better not be true, because it's impossible. But we know that it it isn't true - Mac OS X and Windows Vista are far from flawless, and yet people still manage to muddle their way through using those systems. In fact, lots of people manage to use Ubuntu right now even with a couple of bugs.
      The difference between Mac OS X and Ubuntu in this instance is that a user can use, setup and troubleshoot OS X without ever having to go near the command line. It's been designed that way because the majority of OS X users don't have a clue what to do with a command line shell, and don't want to know. If OS X can do it then so can Ubuntu, and that's what they should be aiming for.

    74. Re:still a long way to go by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Folks marked you funny, but that was actually useful. Yeah, I got slammed by folks, probably rightly so. I've played with Ubuntu and other distros and never even heard of Synaptic. Having never heard of it, and with folks always suggesting aptget, I was left scratching my head wondering "WTF?" Is there an equivalent for maintenance commands?

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    75. Re:still a long way to go by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Ok, I deserve beating. But only a little one. I've tinkered with Debian, Ubuntu, Redhat, Suse, Mandriva, and a few others since 1994. Never made the switch permanent. But if I've missed the obvious all this time, it illustrates a major, but easily correctable, problem. With experienced users always suggesting aptget and other commands, I'd just assumed easier tools didn't exist or weren't reliable. The problem is people need to be aware of the tools quickly when they try Linux (hopefully in a more polite way than your comment.) Otherwise they will assume (incorrectly, like me) that running Linux is going to be a pain.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    76. Re:still a long way to go by infinityxi · · Score: 1

      Well I apologize for my text-tone but I get tired of comments like yours, whether they are well intentioned or not, stating things that are false. Yes, i agree, there are those who tell people to just use apt-get and vi, but these are the power users who wouldn't care for the GUI either way. People in there categories are irrelevant to people trying out a Linux desktop. A quick jump to Ubuntu's website will show you it's features as well as upcoming features for their soon to be released version. Your comment just pisses me off because it is just as relevant as me trolling on about Windows XP doing something that windows 98 does, when it was obviously fixed or talking about Mac OSX from the perspective of OS 8 or OS 9 and trust me you don't want to piss off the Mac guys. My tip is, ignore those power users, those are the people more likely to hurt Linux usage than help it. IRC is not a replacement for phone help and a man page is not always acceptable. This is something a lot of linux experts fail to realize. Not everyone's a moron but at the same time not everyone's a do-it-yourself person. I personally welcome the simplicity of Ubuntu, despite the 1 snag I got on my video settings, because I don't want to make a project out of my desktop.

      Try ubuntu out through the live-cd and judge for yourself (accurately).

      --
      Turn based strategy game that runs over XMPP. Phalanx
    77. Re:still a long way to go by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I didn't mean to piss anyone off. Just honestly befuddled why there didn't seem to be such GUI's. Your point about ignoring power users is on target. My problem is that's who I've usually gotten information from (usually from newsgroups and now googling).

      I've actually tried the last 3 or 4 live CD's of Ubuntu. I wish they'd release live DVD's more prominently (they're tough to find). Knoppix does better in that respect. Alas, I use engineering software that is Windows based. So it's just OS voyeurism for now.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    78. Re:still a long way to go by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Updates and patches will come through the update-notifier, which will periodically check your repos and put an icon in your notification tray when updates are available (Or you can click System->Administration->Update Manager to run it directly). Both this and synaptic use apt in the background.

      There is also Applications->Add/Remove Programs which provides a subset of what Synaptic does, but give popularity ratings and better details about the package, better for average users who are browsing for new software to play with.. This also uses apt, isn't it a wonderfully versatile system?

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    79. Re:still a long way to go by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Don't ignore the power users, that's solving the wrong problem. The reason that all you hear from are power users is because it's really not that hard to become a power user on Linux. Some will disagree, but it took me the better part of a decade to become a "power user" on Windows where I was willing to muck around in the registry without a guide, but only about a year on Linux to accomplish the same level. The advice I would give is to understand what the power users are getting you to do, not just copying and pasting to the command line. Once you start to understand (and please don't hesitate to ask what the commands mean, it won't get you flamed), you are on the road to being a power user yourself.

      Two years ago when I started really using Linux, I was afraid to type "yum" on the command line (Yum is the Redhat world's equiv to Apt, I was using CentOS at the time). Now I'm running pre-alpha versions of Ubuntu while manually editing my xorg.conf and tweaking my 3D desktop in the gconf database. It really is easier to become a power user on Linux than it is on Windows, so don't be intimidated into not trying. I'm not saying you need to be able to do all these things to use Linux, but really, why not learn them when it's so easy?

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    80. Re:still a long way to go by infinityxi · · Score: 1

      Okay, let me clarify I may have been too general. Ignore the subset of power users who think that everything can and should be commandline based. I use the commandline to get things done easier but for someone switching over they aren't going to want to do that. We should move beyond the commandline for simpler tasks. If you are a power user and/or managing servers etc. Then by all means. Not everyone should have to know the commandline. It would be great that part of a migration to Linux there would be a sense of empowerment over the system (using the commandline, getting a feel for the system) but a cozy GUI is also very good. We are talking simple users, not morons. All operating systems will run into snags and the commandline may need to be instituted for troubleshooting, such as the registry for Windows in some cases, but it under smooth operation the commandline can be an optional, not mandatory, piece. By the way I do agree that it is easier to get up to speed on becoming a "power user" but for pushing new users on, many don't want to be power users. This is not yet another rant about how Linux has to "just work" (tm) and be perfect and never have a snag or two like many others state.

      --
      Turn based strategy game that runs over XMPP. Phalanx
    81. Re:still a long way to go by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice. I'd agree: simple stuff doesn't need to be command line. But for some stuff, even in windows, command line is easier. Not paying close enough attention, I'd assumed that no one had felt automating simple tasks was sexy enough to take it on in linux. Good to know I'm wrong: I don't trust my memory enough to remember commands and syntax when I most need it.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    82. Re:still a long way to go by manno · · Score: 1

      The Windows install is flawless that's what I'm comparing Ubuntu to. It's a laptop I have 2 removable drives the factory one that's small and I use only when I have to for my day job, and then there's my 2nd larger drive I use for Ubuntu.

      I was thinking in terms of the hardware's Linux compatibility since I'm using an ATI card, and ATI's closed proprietary driver. In Windows the laptop works fine. Never had mouse(technically it's a touchpad) problems Windows runs everything fine.

      Ubuntu is buggy, and again I still think people look at it through rose colored glasses.

      -manno

    83. Re:still a long way to go by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      what with the gay naming? (emphasis mine, bigotry yours)

      Fuck you, asshole.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    84. Re:still a long way to go by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      The reason (my reason, anyway) for cluing ppl toward the command-line rather than Synaptic (or Kpackage or Adept or what-have-you) is that the command-line is desktop-agnostic. I don't want to have to give a separate set of instructions for every GUI you may possibly be using, when I can just have you cut/paste "sudo apt-get install foo". Saves us both time.

      But I understand what you're saying.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
  8. Are you Experienced ? by Hesty+Heffew · · Score: 0

    I was happy with win98se, even with random BSOD tossed in. WinXP has been o.k. but I'm not ready to hardware up for Vista. I'm already using Firefox, VLC, Torrent, and something besides M$ Paint. Is this Alt OS ready for me ? Can an n00b do Linux ? I have no one to hold my hand.

    1. Re:Are you Experienced ? by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about Ubuntu, but I assume the following applies to it as well: with popular distros like Fedora, all you need to is enter the irc chatroom (irc://freenode/fedora) from any machine with internet access (it need not be the one you're installing Linux on) and ask your questions, clearly , but politely, and you're likely to get as much hand holding as is possible (limited to things like time of day since many people sleep)

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:Are you Experienced ? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      For Ubuntu, www.ubuntuforums.org is probably the best spot to look for help.

    3. Re:Are you Experienced ? by holomorph · · Score: 1

      I suggest you dl and burn yourself a CD, then you can boot off the CD and play with it w/o having to install to your hard drive. If you like it, go ahead and install on another partition and dual boot while you make sure everything works and it's right for you.

    4. Re:Are you Experienced ? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm quite new to Linux, but decided to try out Ubuntu. I'm using Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy). I dual boot, and have been for about a year now because I have to use Windows mainly, for school.

      I found the ubuntu forums to be very helpful, and I also found the ubuntu guide (www.ubuntuguide.org) to be extremely helpful for the basic things that a new user would run into.

      As noted in these comments, you will need to get to know the console (command line) more so than needed in Windows. However, I have now found that I prefer it for many things. The other thing you'll need to get used to is not having root user privileges for everything you do, meaning if you want to do something not mundane (and sometimes even mundane things), you'll need to give yourself root privileges for that action (which in ubuntu is most easily done by typing "sudo" in the console before your command).

      I feel like I've become real familiar with how everything works by trying to add fancy things to the user interface (like a rotating cube desktop). Working on those fancy things, which is sometimes difficult (but easier now than it used to be) gave me the understanding I need such that doing all the basic stuff is now absolutely no problem. The forums and Ubuntu guide got me there.

      I will note, though, it is not like windows. It can't be--you just can't have it be as secure as Ubuntu and as easy to use as Windows (I'm sure that's why Windows is so hole-ridden; it was all in the name of useability). On the other hand, Linux really is a lot easier to use than it used to be, has good support, and can do things Windows can't (I really think my rotating cube desktop is awesome).

    5. Re:Are you Experienced ? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      I installed ubuntu 6.04 updated to 6.10, it broke a few things but mostly is working fine.

      As mentioned before the wireless applications and support are a show stopper. Typing sudo ifdown and ifup is no fun, and having to hard type the ssid without getting a list of available ones, also no fun.

      So I fixed it, got a wlassistant program, very nice.

      Only problem it needs sudo to run and I haven't been able to figure out how to do that from inside gnome or blackbox.

      Seems like something that should be in the right click menu (Especially if it will fail without it)... For me personally these are the kinds of things that totally need to be solved, they are so simple that they are hard to describe and hard to search for, "sudo gnome right-click ubuntu"?

      Other than that I'm pretty happy with it, I've got maybe 4-5 error messages that I'd like to disable but can't (wireless access uses a web prompt and wlassistant complains needlessly, symantec has packages it can't download but keeps trying etc)...

      Also some open source applications I'd gotten used to running in windows seem to work WORSE in linux, there is no support for Miranda (an excellent IM client for windows), and the Open-Office spellcheck isn't working (And doesn't offer Canadian english[which I assume they replace with British English, though how hard is it to offer a link file to the British dictionary in that case]... Opera is a pain to install in Linux but got it running...

      I guess these are mostly application concerns but they've become something of a pain in the ass.

      Just saying it's not all roses, but I'm enjoying it and I have a good support team :)

    6. Re:Are you Experienced ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'm sure that's why Windows is so hole-ridden; it was all in the name of useability)

      That's also why Mac OS X is so hole-ridden. All in the name of usability.

      Oh, wait...
    7. Re:Are you Experienced ? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      good point.

    8. Re:Are you Experienced ? by FigTree · · Score: 1

      Try gsudo, it's kdesu on KDE.

    9. Re:Are you Experienced ? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      I don't know about most of these things, Opera, however, is my browser of choice, and I found that Automatix installs it very easily.

      This does bring up another usability issue, however--new Ubuntu users usually end up needing to add repositories (well, everyone needs to add repositories usually; it's just that new users do as well, and it's more complicated for them).

  9. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll wait for the first patches after stable... Tipsy Tranny.

  10. DD by mastershake_phd · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe they will call the next one Dogged Doe, or Bold Bunny, or Expert Elephant, or Leaping Lemar, or Fire Fox, or....

    1. Re:DD by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will call the next one Dogged Doe, or Bold Bunny, or Expert Elephant, or Leaping Lemar, or Fire Fox, or....

      or Flaming Feline!

    2. Re:DD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my guess is that it will start with a 'G'

    3. Re:DD by mastershake_phd · · Score: 2, Funny

      my guess is that it will start with a 'G'

      Gnarly Gnome, Gestating Grinch, Glad Gestapo, Gooey Goonie, Garish German, Garnished Goat, Global Geese....

    4. Re:DD by noldrin · · Score: 1

      or maybe Gnashing Gnu?

    5. Re:DD by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Gonorrheic Gander is my vote...

      Hey, where is the poll person at anyways?

    6. Re:DD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have gaybuntu for that.

  11. Newbie Question by pinkocommie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm installing Ubuntu (Kubuntu actually, a KDE fan) for the first time, looking to migrate from SUSE. I got a copy of 6.10 and thought I'd use that and then do an in place upgrade to 7.04 next month (from what I read online it was a matter of issuing a single command). What do you guys recommend? A straight up 7.04 beta or 6.10 followed by the upgrade? I'm somewhat of a newbie with ~nix (but with relatively standard hardware). Thanks

    1. Re:Newbie Question by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Straight up 7.04. It's pretty doggone stable and upgrades always suck. The upgrade from Edgy to Feisty (6.10 to 7.04) is supposed to be a lot better than from Dapper to Edgy, but I wouldn't take the chance... Just get the newest.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Newbie Question by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did an upgrade from edgy to feisty while it was very much still a moving target, days prior to the beta release and there's been packages flapping every which way - and the upgrade STILL appears to have worked with the possible exception of gnome-network-manager. I'm fairly confident that by official release time they will have it pretty well worked out. But the beta is working so well for me right now that I would just go ahead and go to the beta right away.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Newbie Question by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends. I've been a Fedora user for a while (still have it on my webserver box), but after hearing all the talk about Ubuntu, I thought I'd give it a shot on my dual boot/main PC. I have to say that I installed Dapper and then did the upgrade to Edgy and it was super easy with no problems. Granted, it took a little while (about an hour and a half), but there were no problems.

      Kudos on trying out *nix. I am a novice at it myself but have begun playing around with different distros to learn it. While I have a server that relies on it, I have a couple of partitions on my dual boot machine that I can swap out installs whenever I want. I keep tinkering with them and if I screw something up, who cares?

      So, if you're installing it to learn *nix, I'd recommend installing Edgy and then doing the upgrade (either via the command line or with a CD) for the experience. The worst thing that can happen is you have to trash an installation and start over, but you'll have learned something.

    4. Re:Newbie Question by voislav98 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should try MEPIS instead of Kubuntu, it's also based on Ubuntu and uses a lot of Ubuntu packages but it's much better (as far as KDE environment goes). It's now in the release candidate stage for 6.5, so the new version should be out any day. It also has Beryl, codecs and video drivers installed by out of the box, no need for Automatix and such.

    5. Re:Newbie Question by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      Start with Edgy! There's a bunch of post-install updates, but over broadband they should all be handled within an hour. All included programs will work right out of the gate, though Synaptic seems a bit strange to the uninitiated. (I still don't get the "tag" system, but it's not essential to install programs that you know) The "Add/Remove" feature in the KDE menu seems more functional, however it doesn't seem to go very far outside the Canonical Ubuntu release.

      Leave the Beta to the Beta-testers, I say. (emphasis on "tester" --if you don't mind risking your data or system integrity, be my guest)

      With any luck, they will have a vastly improved upgrade vector for pre-existing installs. That was the unfortunate event from Dapper to Edgy; however the Kubuntu Edgy LiveCD installation works flawlessly.

      You'll find much better KDE integration with Kubuntu (vs. SuSE 10.0) ...IMHO, the SuSE environment kept having disassociation issues; the Novell code wasn't aware of what the KDE/Qt/Python code was doing. Software dependencies kept being broken, removing packages was a total crapshoot.

      Now in Kubuntu, there's really no problems other than what is already inherent to KDE itself. With KDE getting a face-lift next month, and Feisty ready to push it out the door, it's promising to be an exciting update.

      Best of luck!

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
    6. Re:Newbie Question by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Yes. I updated my laptop to Feisty a couple days ago and it's worked flawlessly, likewise on my home box and my work PC.

      The only issue I noticed was that Ubuntu's version of slrn has removed some unneeded commands from .slrnrc, but that was easily fixed.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:Newbie Question by willisbueller · · Score: 1

      how is mepis though for software support?
      I loved Ubuntu, but I hated gnome; so i'm back on OpenSuse for desktop needs, as they provide a nice KDE implementation.
      you'd recommend it tho?

  12. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I laughed. Does that make me a racist?

  13. Beta People by LiENUS · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please, If you are new to linux don't run the beta version, Use 6.10 its much better and more supported. The beta is not intended for mainstream use. In the #ubuntu channel on freenode there have been people coming in asking questions about Feisty Fawn for months. Those people belong in #ubuntu+1. The beta releases are not supported by the mainstream support, don't install this and expect to be fully supported.

    1. Re:Beta People by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I see no reason why someone new to Linux wouldn't do fine with the Feisty Beta - as long as they understand the concept of Beta software and won't be too disappointed if something breaks. The Feisty beta seems pretty stable, and includes some stuff like Compiz that might be fun for a new user.

      Just remember, if you're using beta software: If it breaks you get to keep both pieces - after you report the bug.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Beta People by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Please, If you are new to linux don't run the beta version, Use 6.10 its much better and more supported.
      Or 6.06, which is scheduled for long term support.

    3. Re:Beta People by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      The biggest issue that a new user is likely to have with any version of Ubuntu is hardware support. Hardware support, especially for recent hardware, is much improved in each newer release. I would much sooner suggest the Feisty Beta to a new user on unknown hardware than Dapper, simply because the improved hardware support is likely to help them more than the little bit of Beta instability will hurt them.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    4. Re:Beta People by Micah · · Score: 1

      In general, that is pretty sound advice.

      However, on a new laptop especially, no way could you make the case that Edgy is better than Feisty.

      1. Wireless is much better integrated into Feisty. It worked with my Intel PRO/Wireless 3945 out of the box. Didn't have to do anything.

      2. Some new laptop sound chips (ALC882 for one) only work with a 2.6.19+ kernel. Feisty has it, Edgy doesn't.

      I started using Feisty at Herd 5 when I got my new laptop, and I'm thrilled with it. There have been a couple minor hiccups, but it's been stable.

    5. Re:Beta People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I see no reason why someone new to Linux wouldn't do fine with the Feisty Beta - as long as they understand the concept of Beta software and won't be too disappointed if something breaks.

      You don't see any contradiction in that statement? If you're new to Linux and something breaks, it's not disappointment they'd be feeling. It'd be frustration, and they wouldn't know if the problem was with the beta or something they did.

      Personally, as a non-Linux user, the last time I wanted to try Ubuntu it failed to install. As I had no idea why, and not enough interest to find out, I simply shrugged and gave up.

    6. Re:Beta People by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      As I had no idea why, and not enough interest to find out, I simply shrugged and gave up.

      If you had no interest in the project of installing a new operating system, you were doomed to fail to begin with. Even if it had installed perfectly, the first time it didn't immediately do something you already had working in Windows you would have given up.

      People who are actually going to be able to install an OS on their own generally have at least enough interest to deal with a couple minor issues, whether they be beta bugs or Adobe Flash not being installed by default.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    7. Re:Beta People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You assume too much. I'm not exactly new to computers. I've been programming for more than 20 years and have had several commercial programs published.

      So installing Ubuntu is a "project," is it? Well, maybe this is the year of Linux on the desktop!

    8. Re:Beta People by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Installing any operating system for the first time is a "project". It not an especially difficult project for a system like Ubuntu, but it's definitely not a trivial task to undertake. Computer experience makes it a bit easier, but there will still be points where you have to think a bit to figure out what to do next.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  14. Kubuntu 7.04 beta also released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Kubuntu 7.04 beta also released by Punch-Drunk+Slob · · Score: 0

      Good thing Kubuntu has the announcement on their homepage, because the links to download the Buntu variants from TFA download page point to none (as of the time of this writing).

      What I'm really waiting for is Xubuntu.

      --
      By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes: Open, locks, whoever knocks!
  15. Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by cheap.computer · · Score: 1

    I hope they fixed the 64bit flash issue with firefox and got wine ported to work on 64bit ubuntu. I am still waiting on 64bit version of wine, there are some docs on howto get 32bit wine installed on the Ubuntu forum. I read that there is a 30% performance increase by having a 64only OS, anyone know anything abt this ?

    1. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by MooseMuffin · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wouldn't run the 64 bit version of any OS unless you really had a reason. Theres no 64 bit flash for any platform, no wine and plenty of other misc problems. Unless you have a good reason (> 4gb ram) then you're only going to run into headaches.

    2. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by a1ok · · Score: 1

      I am also using the 64 bit version of Ubuntu - for no better reason than having a 64 bit chip in my desktop :) Anyway, last week I updated to Feisty after reading some other article here or on digg, then this week decided to try searching for Wine yet another time. Someone has actually made a .deb package for wine on amd64, including some of the other required stuff like winecfg etc. Unfortunately, I couldn't find it after a bit of searching - I'm at work right now, and can't remember the exact name of the file.

      But it does exist, and can be installed by simply double clicking on it after downloading once the dependencies are met. Ubuntu already installs ia32-libs, or else maybe I had installed that earlier and forgot. Anyway, I just had to install libasound32 (iirc) before I could successfully install wine on my system. Checked and it appears to be working fine, Warcraft III started without much issues (earlier I forgot to use -opengl and the dx version gfx appeared to have no anti-aliasing etc.)

      As for the speed difference, I don't know much about that - but imho 30% gain is highly doubtful for normal applications, maybe ones that use a lot of cache or 64 bit floating point calculations? Can't really give any useful info on that, sorry. Will try and post a link to the 64 bit Feisty deb after I get home.

    3. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1, Informative

      I read that there is a 30% performance increase by having a 64only OS, anyone know anything about this?

      There is a slight performance benifit to running 64 bit, but it's not worth worrying about. It can be as much as 15 - 20% in rigged benchmarks, and even higher in 64-bit specific code (you don't have any), but it's more like 3% for using real-world apps. Compared to the hassle of running non-native code, the minor performance gain is rarely worth it.

      I hope they fixed the 64bit flash issue with firefox and got wine ported to work on 64bit ubuntu. I am still waiting on 64bit version of wine, there are some docs on howto get 32bit wine installed on the Ubuntu forum.

      If you're going to be messing with Wine, it's definitely not worth screwing around with the 64 bit version of Ubuntu. It's possible to get flash working, but 32 bit windows code really wants to run in 32 bit mode. It really wants to run on Windows, but if you're determined to run it on Linux you're better off keeping your silly tasks to just "I'm running code on the wrong OS" rather than "I'm running code on the wrong OS and the wrong CPU architecture".

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    4. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by holomorph · · Score: 1

      I got wine working for the 64 bit version, but it was a while ago and I don't quite remember how; think it might have been a package someone built and linked to on the forums. I also remember reading some compile it yourself instructions. Also, for flash, I got the flash 9 beta to work by using nspluginwrapper (should be able to find the howto on ubuntuforums).

    5. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make an excellent observation and suggestion. However, in my experience with x64 Feisty, the only real problems I had were:
      1. Flash worked but had empty containers (fix -> changed user permissions on lib .so(s) to 755).
      2. For games (like Loki or current ones), I had 32 bit missing libs (fix -> 1) d/l 32-bit libs from packages.ubuntu.com, and 2) install ia32libs and linux32).
      Other than that, Feisty x64 (for me) runs like an olympic marathoner, whereas my XP Pro x64 (at times) feels like he's slowing down for a banana and cup of water.

    6. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by BeeRockxs · · Score: 1

      The open-source flash-decoder swfdec supports YouTube since the latest release.

    7. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Compholio · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...no wine...
      While I'll admit that support needs to get better, you can still run Wine on 64-bit. For Ubuntu this means you need to download the ".deb" file for the Wine release and install the package like this:

      sudo dpkg --force-architecture -i wine*.deb
    8. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by MooseMuffin · · Score: 1

      No doubt theres work arounds for most everything, but really, what are you gaining besides that warm feeling that you're using all those bits you paid for? I've run the 64 bit flavor of the dapper and edgy and while I've managed to scour the internet until I got everything to work, I'll be switching to 32 bit feisty when its officially released and have all of these things work out of the box.

    9. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by ceeam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the most "unnerdy" of users, maybe not, but there _is_ one big reason to do it - "market share". If nobody uses x64 OSs then what incentive is there for software to be ported/released? It's like advising users to stick with MSIE because some sites may not work. And of course - eventually - we will move to x64 and will be able to drop compatibility i386 runtimes from our systems. Let's hope that it takes less than 13 years that i386 adoption took.

    10. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by kbahey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your reasons are valid mainly for the desktop.

      However, on the server they don't apply.

      I have been running 64-bit on an AMD server without any problems (apart from a trivial quirk in PHP's PEAR/PECL which has an easy workaround [just add ini_set('memory_size', 16MB) in some script]).

    11. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by MooseMuffin · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Never tried it in such an environment.

    12. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't run the 64 bit version of any OS unless you really had a reason. Theres no 64 bit flash for any platform, no wine and plenty of other misc problems. Unless you have a good reason (> 4gb ram) then you're only going to run into headaches.
      Sorry for the newbie question; we switched over to Ubuntu (from WinXP) about three months ago, and love it so far except for my wife not being able to play CNN videos. Can you run the non-64-bit version on a 64-bit system?
    13. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) x64 is a Microsoft marketing term. The architecture is x86-64, or AMD64. 2) Things are already moving in the right direction; more and more software is being compiled and released for both 32-bit and 64-bit. This isn't going to be another IPv6. And if you're using only FOSS, you should be able to put together a pure 64-bit system without too much trouble. But for desktop users that may need binary-only drivers, video codecs, etc, there's no sense in going 64-bit just for the hell of it.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    14. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      I read that there is a 30% performance increase by having a 64only OS, anyone know anything abt this ?

      Here's a Gentoo user in the making. Fantastic !

      --
      :wq
    15. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment is remarkably naiive (borderline FUD). I'm running slamd64 (a 64bit slackware) on a Core2duo with no problems.
      And guess what? I can run 32bit binaries - ergo, I use 32bit firefox/opera if I need flash.
      I've not tried 32bit wine binaries, but see no reason for them not to work.

    16. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Eythian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, apparently 32-bit Ubuntu works just fine on x86-64. Personally, I use 64-bit and nspluginwrapper to make 32-bit flash work in the 64-bit browser. It's a bit of a hack, and not totally stable, but definitely works well enough. The one thing that is quite tricky is getting the w32codecs working in 64-bit, you need to install a 32-bit mplayer to work with them.

    17. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Flash? No Win32 apps? Those sound like pretty good reasons to me!

    18. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash is like 90% for ads, 10% for content that people care about. The fact is that many people won't care if it's missing.

      Still a simple way to not give up on 32 bit apps, and not run through another layer of emulation-- is the classic chroot jail approach. Install a mini 32 bit system inside your 64 bit system, that's just the core software plus what you need. It sounds like a hassle, but if you write a simple shell script to pop into it and open the program you want, and then make a startup item or icon to execute it, it becomes the same functionality as we're all used to-- click on an icon and boom you're good to go, and there's no noticeable slowdown.

      But this is even better--

      The amd64/x86_64 OSs do tend to be faster than the i386 OSs, but I found that's mostly due to one line in the kernel menuconfig. Just take an i386 and recompile it specifying your processor (for me k8) and things will be noticeably faster. The great thing about doing that on Ubuntu is that (a) there is a convenient tool to make your new kernel into an installable deb file that cares of everything and (b) you read in a saved config file so you don't have to go through the hassle of thinking about what hardware you have. Now you have a zippier OS running 32 bit apps! You can have your cake and eat it too!

    19. Re:Running Herd4 on AMD 64 by craiglarry · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. Originally I went to dapper 64 bit-WHY?-because I have AMD 64. It's a totally breached reason. You will surely have constant trouble and lose your joy. I switched to i386 because amd is dual compatible(or whatever it's officially called) and now things are cooking pretty good. I was told the speed would not be good with non 64 bit system, but I think there is little or no difference for most things. Stay away from 64 OS unless you want to play with it or are masochistic.

  16. Some thoughts on Feisty by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I did a dist-upgrade from edgy to feisty about three days ago. Nothing has gone downhill and things have only gotten better. I have had a few problems, though I write them off as transitional issues. After all, it was pre-beta software.

    My biggest problem has been with the nvidia kernel module. For those who don't know, you can make sure this is installed properly by doing:

    sudo aptitude install linux-restricted-modules-`uname -r` nvidia-glx

    This is all well and good but for some reason the nvidia kernel module was just randomly disappearing! No joke. I ended up using module-assistant (sudo it) to build my own nvidia module, which worked great, and got everything working again.

    There is a new restricted module manager which explicitly informs you that you are using restricted modules, which may not be supported. The system may have made it easy for you to install binary drivers, but it makes damned sure that you know you're using them and what the downside is.

    The network-manager gains zeroconf support in this release, but there's still no WPA options in the network-manager. I thought that was coming in this release? I have network-manager-gnome installed, but it doesn't look anything like this. So I don't know WTF is going on. And I'm in the middle of installing a bunch of packages so I can't find out at this moment, either. The default driver may not support WPA, I wouldn't know, but my network-manager applet still is a pale ghost of what I'm seeing in screenshots.

    In general, what most beta users of Feisty are going to notice in comparison to Edgy is graphical. Various theme elements have changed slightly. The biggest change, of course, is the official inclusion of binary drivers, which is much easier to get working. You won't need envy to get those nvidia drivers working any more (assuming you were unable or unwilling to do the install manually, envy seems to have been the most common way to install 'em.) Envy, of course, does not support Feisty.

    Early adopters will note that EasyUbuntu and Automatix both still lack Feisty support. Way to test and be ahead of the curve, guys. But of course that's not Ubuntu's fault.

    This is a lot less painless than my last experience, attempting to upgrade a somewhat tweaked dapper to edgy. This system is no less tweaked, but the dist-upgrade went fine.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by Rutulian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The network-manager gains zeroconf support in this release, but there's still no WPA options in the network-manager. I thought that was coming in this release? I have network-manager-gnome installed, but it doesn't look anything like this.

      Hmmm, not sure what you mean by this because zeroconf isn't related to network-manager as far as I know. Anyway, your network-manager applet should look just like your screenshot. Are you sure you are running the applet? Type nm-applet at the terminal. Ubuntu ships another wireless applet with the same icon, but it isn't the network-manager applet. So make sure you are actually running the network-manager applet. And WPA configuration has been there for at least a year, so you should be able to see it unless there are driver issues with your wireless card.

    2. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      For some reason it wasn't showing up. I executed the following command:

      sudo apt-get --reinstall install network-manager network-manager-gnome

      Then I rebooted, then it appeared. I'm not sure if just running nm-applet would have been enough, or if I needed to do what I did, but it worked :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by miro+f · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem has been with the nvidia kernel module. For those who don't know, you can make sure this is installed properly by doing:

      sudo aptitude install linux-restricted-modules-`uname -r` nvidia-glx


      I don't know why everyone gives this piece of advice. The problem is you're only installing the restricted modules package for your current kernel. if the kernel gets updated (as often happens in a prerelease product) then that means your restricted modules will disappear.

      the easiest solution is to install 'linux-restricted-modules-386' or whatever kernel version you are using and that will keep it updated for you
      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    4. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Er, I've been using network manager to connect to my WPA network since 6.04.

    5. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by zxsqkty · · Score: 1

      So is it a good idea to uninstall EasyUbuntu and/or Automatix before an upgrade?

      Should I reset my machine to a default 6.10 installation before upgrading? How are customizations handled? For example, I removed Evolution because it was crap. Will this affect an upgrade?

      Ubuntu noob here...

      --
      Caution: May contain nuts.
    6. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      the easiest solution is to install 'linux-restricted-modules-386' or whatever kernel version you are using and that will keep it updated for you

      Except when it doesn't, which I've had happen with both edgy and, already, feisty.

      So far I've found that the -generic kernel seems to do better on average. For some reason they bone the -386 kernel more often. Restricted modules has been downright broken there, and so has smp. I haven't done a benchmark or anything on the difference between the two, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by miro+f · · Score: 1

      yeah I notice the restricted modules occasionally lag behind the kernel release. I solve this issue by simply not installing the kernel update unless the restricted modules are also updated.

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    8. Re:Some thoughts on Feisty by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I just noticed that the -386 kernel doesn't have SMP :) in my defense it was automatically installed because at some point the -386 kernel was a required dep for nvidia-glx. Might have been envy's fault, though. I could USE generic, but I had to have -386 installed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. EFI support? by Knara · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if this'll use ELILO (in particular so I'm not limited to gentoo as my sole choice for installing on a MacTel without Bootcamp?)

    (yeah yeah, technically you can do it on most any dist, but I'm not that interesting in hacking it that much)

    1. Re:EFI support? by J0nne · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm wondering if it'll even work with boot camp. Last time i tried, it didn't work. (the liveCD wouldn't go into the right video mode, and the windows installer didn't work).

    2. Re:EFI support? by bnenning · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was able to install Edgy on my MBP with only slight trickery as described here. The LiveCD booted with no problems at all. The only shortcoming is no wireless; trying to use ndiswrapper produced kernel panics on boot.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    3. Re:EFI support? by JeepFanatic · · Score: 1

      I've been dual booting Edgy on my Intel Mac Mini at work w/o any problem and I ran Dapper before that. I found some good directions online that show how to accomplish this (unfortunately they are at work right now - if you want them, send me an email and I'll email them to you on Monday). In addition to Boot Camp to initially partition the drive, I'm using rEFIt as a boot loader (check it out on SourceForge if you haven't already).

  18. Been running it by AxXium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been running it for some time now as I've signed up as a tester some time back. I must say in the past I was a big Ubuntu hater as I am part of another Linux distro's admin staff. However, I gave it a spin and must admit, as far as polish, ease of use, stability and the latest software goes, Ubuntu is by far the ultimate "free as in beer" ditro in my book. My previous biased opinion was quickly shattered. In retrospect I wish I have tried Edgy.

    1. Re:Been running it by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I must say in the past I was a big Ubuntu hater as I am part of another Linux distro's admin staff


      You're pretty young, then? Early twenties?
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Been running it by shish · · Score: 1

      I was a big Ubuntu hater as I am part of another Linux distro's admin staff.

      Why are these related?

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    3. Re:Been running it by AxXium · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because unfortunately we sometimes get all excited and tend to want to be number one at DistroWatch http://distrowatch.com/ Then one day you group up and realize we are all on the same team. However, a little friendly competition makes us all strive to be better at what we do, so looking back I don't regret pushing myself harder as I tried to get us over Ubuntu.

    4. Re:Been running it by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Consider me clueless, but other than page hits, how do you become number 1 on distrowatch?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:Been running it by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      That's about it.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  19. Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People still talk about Linux on Slashdot? I thought all the threads on this site were either console fanboy shouting matches or about why they should legalize stealing IP.

    1. Re:Linux? by jeevesbond · · Score: 1

      Coward: one man by circumstance is in splendour set, whilst another irons pants in a laundrette. Go and iron my pants Coward.

      --
      I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
    2. Re:Linux? by zxsqkty · · Score: 1

      This post illustrates why we need a "-1 Bored with this shite" mod option.

      --
      Caution: May contain nuts.
  20. mobo RAID support? by postmortem · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Today, more and more people opt in for using home RAID arrays, primarily from free chipset controllers that implement RAID 0,1, (5) capabilities in software. It is free performance upgrade for anybody with more than one hard drive.

    For long time, no Linux distro would support this 'winRAID'. Then dmraid project was created at RedHat, and soon after, Fedora Core 5,6, SUSE 10.2, and RHEL 5 have installer support for it.

    Last I've heard that future Ubuntu releases will contain support for dmraid... does anybody can verify that is the case, that is Ubuntu 7.04 can be installed on RAID0 device created on onboard RAID controller?

    1. Re:mobo RAID support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Ubuntu has had dmraid for a while, but it was outdated on the livecd- upgrading it through synaptic, then running dmraid from the shell would find my raid. Then I could use the normal install method to partition and go. It was not all smooth, but Ubuntu can definitely be installed on dmraid setups.

    2. Re:mobo RAID support? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Why not just use the software raid built in? With the mobo raid I've found issues where swapping a motherboard can be problematic. You can avoid the problem by using software raid completely. Not to mention significant ease of use imho. That's one of the number one advantages Linux has (for the end user) imho.

    3. Re:mobo RAID support? by postmortem · · Score: 1

      Because on other partitions I have Windows, and another NTFS partition with lots of multimedia. And that is reality - users want to use their RAID configurations for Windows, and to have compatible Linux distro that can use them too. Thus Linux software RAID is only plausible if you are strictly on Linux, but in dual boot environment it doesn't stand. Linux shouldn't force people to chose something incompatible with other platforms.

    4. Re:mobo RAID support? by Warped_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Edgy, and even Dapper could be installed on fakeRAID machines via dmraid. it was just a bitch to do. Hopefully, the 7.04 installer supports doing so out of the box; I don't relish the thought of having to repeat that process anytime soon.

      --
      - D
  21. Ubuntu Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  22. Ubuntu is now automatically prelinked by sygin · · Score: 5, Informative

    This Ubuntu release 7.04 boots faster and is snappier than the previous 6.10. It no longer requires prelinking to increase speed.

    From the ubuntu forums:

    "UPDATE 1/2/07: Prelink is no longer necessary in Feisty. Feisty uses a new linking mechanism called DT_GNU_HASH which dramatically speeds up the linking process without the need for continuously running the prelink program."

    Another great improvement is hardware (esp. wireless and graphics) support.

    Now thats progress, each release faster and better than the last.

    --
    Don't make your problems my problems!
  23. Rejected Names by Billosaur · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somnolent Squirrel

    Crank Cardinal

    Lecherous Lemming

    Aromatic Alpaca

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Rejected Names by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      In case you aren't paying attention, ubuntu seems to be traversing the alphabet with release names. Breezy Badger, ?????, Dapper Drake, Edgy Eft, Feisty Fawn, Garbled Groundhog, Hungry Hippo, etc.

      (Well, maybe not the Garbled Groundhog or Hungry Hippo yet, but you get the picture--although it would be WAY cool if they used Hungry Hippo!).

      You saw it here first.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    2. Re:Rejected Names by Ankur+Dave · · Score: 1

      Close, but Ubuntu didn't start out like that:

      1. Warty Warthog (4.10)
      2. Hoary Hedgehog (5.04)
      3. Breezy Badger (5.10)
      4. Dapper Drake (6.06)
      5. Edgy Eft (6.10)
      6. Feisty Fawn (7.04)

      (BTW, the version number is <year_released>.<month_released>)

    3. Re:Rejected Names by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      Let's hope when they get around to A again in 20 years, they go with Asshole Alligator.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    4. Re:Rejected Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just waiting for Ubuntu Rampant Rabbit

  24. Shouldn't it be 7.03? by ringer9cs · · Score: 1

    Isn't it still March now? Why 7.04 instead of 7.03?

    1. Re:Shouldn't it be 7.03? by MooseMuffin · · Score: 1

      This is a beta. The final release comes out next month.

    2. Re:Shouldn't it be 7.03? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a beta for the April release.

    3. Re:Shouldn't it be 7.03? by jeevesbond · · Score: 1

      Isn't it still March now? Why 7.04 instead of 7.03?
      Because it won't be realeased until next month. This is the Beta. Have a look at the Feisty Release Dates for confirmation.
      --
      I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
    4. Re:Shouldn't it be 7.03? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      It's a beta. Official release target is still April.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    5. Re:Shouldn't it be 7.03? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The official release is in April(04) 2007. This release is only a beta !

  25. Re:Ubuntu still VERY BUGGY!!! by JensenDied · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is a BETA release, read the Tags for this page... if you want the stable grab 6.06 LTS release

    --

    09:F9:11:02 - 9D:74:E3:5B - D8:41:56:C5 - 63:56:88:C0

  26. The "G" version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next release will be "Gaping Goatse". It will give an entirely new meaning to "Open Source"...

    1. Re:The "G" version... by wellingj · · Score: 1

      common mods that deserves a +1 funny....

    2. Re:The "G" version... by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Now that's funny. That comment earned its +5.

  27. I've gone from Breezy to Dapper to Edgy to Feisty by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The updates are NOT always perfect.

    If you've used EasyUbuntu or something like that, you may have problems.

    If you're not sure of your comfort level with fixing something like that (or if you depend upon a wireless NIC for connectivity) then you should just go with a clean install.

    People with more experience will be able to identify possible problems BEFORE upgrading and also be able to handle them AFTER the upgrade.

    I've had no problems but then I use an old NIC and I have a decent amount of Linux experience.

    Recently there has been an issue where "hda" suddenly became "sda" and caused some issues for people. Ubuntu changed the way the IDE systems were labeled to make things easier in the future. I noticed when my USB drive changed. This could be a problem for someone with less experience.

  28. We'll see... by CasperIV · · Score: 1

    I hope to god that ATI has a driver pack in the sources now that works with the x200m in my laptop. That was the only pain in the ass the last time I installed Ubuntu (and it's not even Ubuntu's fault). ATI just decided to screwup their drivers on the latter releases. The card would detect and work great... just no opengl support at all. That just won't work for me, and leads me to a weeks worth of insanity and driver hacking to get it working (more or less).

    1. Re:We'll see... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      I've got the same card in my Compaq laptop (granted that's Fedora, not Ubuntu) and not only can I not get the GL effects to work (I keep hearing the open source drivers work fantastic, yet I haven't got a clue where to get em) - but at least 50% to 75% of the time I boot (dual boot between FC6 and WinXP Pro) the GDM/KDM/???DM and the Xorg server totally screw up, leaving my screen looking like "nails on a chalkboard"

      I know there's quite a few differences between the Debian based Ubuntu and FC, but if you or anybody else could tell me where to get these mysterious opensource ATI drivers, it'd be great...

    2. Re:We'll see... by mashade · · Score: 1

      You've already got them!

      The 'radeon' kernel module is the OpenGL enabled open source driver for ATI Radeon cards. Chances are that your current xorg.conf is using the old 'ati' driver which I've never had good luck with.

      It'll look like this in /etc/X11/xorg.conf :

      Driver "ati"

      Sub radeon for ati and give it a whirl. Back up the old xorg.conf first, though. You should be in business. If X comes up fine, run:

      glxinfo |grep direct

      This should output: direct rendering: Yes (or no, if no DRI)

      --
      Technology tips and tricks.
    3. Re:We'll see... by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      Gentoo has some instructions if you can translate them to the corresponding Fedora commands.
      http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_DRI_with_ATi_Open-Sou rce_Drivers

    4. Re:We'll see... by WoggerRotters · · Score: 1

      I used to have a laptop with an ATI R250 Mobility card. (Off the top of my head) I can tell you that the last proprietary ATI driver that supports your card, or any card older than R300 (I think) is version 8.24.8. The next version of that driver dropped support for your, and older cards. Either install that version, or go with the opensource radeon driver.

    5. Re:We'll see... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      The 'radeon' driver works 100% for cards up to the 9250. For other 9 series and X series cards, it frequently works. For X1 series cards, saying that it works would definitely be exaggerating.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  29. mod parent up by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We can do a great service for Canicals servers and there mirrors if we bit torrent.

    Also because I am downloading this torrent and more people would mean better transfer rates. :-)

  30. Partition manager by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    Glad to see that they are finally trying to fix the partition manager. The only way I have been able to try out Ubuntu was on a machine that I didn't worry about blowing away the primary partition. I would have had to blow away my home partition on my windows/linux box with previous releases of Ubuntu. If you check out online forums, you would see that was a fairly common problem.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Partition manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best way i have found to install Ubuntu, or any Linux distro, is to use an outside boot manager/partition manager. I recommend either System Commander (with partitioning) or additionally Partition Magic 7.0. SysCom does an excellent job of managing (and protecting) the boot sector tables. PM7 only knows Ext2 formatting but it's easy to reformat for Ext3 on the install.

      I've installed distros on machines that have had Win98, DOS or XP (or, in my case, all three) already in place. Repartitioning from outside and creating an extended partition for the Linux swap and root partitions is a snap. I've never had a primary partition blown away using this method, even on a nasty Slackware install.

      Important tip: use the alternate installer rather than the "just install this thing" cd, because you want GRUB/LILO installed in the root partition and the normal install won't give you this option and will install GRUB/LILO to the MBR. You also want to use manual partitioning in order to select the partitions previously created to install Linux. Needless to say, the installer is in text mode :)

      Do not even attempt to use the idealistically-named "XP Boot Manager" or you'll have disaster. Likewise, I have had GRUB/LILO get a little obstreperous and chew at the MBR attempting to dual-boot Linux/Winxx.

      As the song goes, "You gotta keep 'em separated." Using an outside boot manager will even keep XP from contaminating/destroying a Win98 install, which shouldn't happen but does, every time. I always use a third-party boot manager on a multiboot system. If you don't like/wish to pay for System Commander there are some excellent freeware boot managers out there.

    2. Re:Partition manager by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      If all you're doing is a simple Windows / Ubuntu dual boot system, the Ubuntu partition manager and Grub on the MBR works perfectly. If you want to mess with stuff like different versions of Windows you might need something like that, but for a basic dual boot system something like System Commander is a waste of money.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  31. Isn't there, now? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

    (in other words, code names suck, but there is no way around them)
    Having someone say it so expressly almost makes me wonder if there truly is no way around them, since really everyone seems to use some kind of code names, including Ubuntu, Fedora and Microsoft. As for me, I have always been referring to Ubuntu and Fedora by their version numbers. I don't even know the code names when other people use them. I only use the code names for Windows versions because really everyone seems to do the same, and it just comes automatically (this is /., so people here really should know, but just in case someone doesn't: Windows 2000 is NT 5.0, XP is 5.1 and Vista is, IIRC, 6.0).

    But really, why do they insist on these silly code names? I can't see that it makes anything any better, and they do make it worse, since code names cannot be compared like version numbers can. Is it really so that there is no way around it, and in that case, why is that?

    1. Re:Isn't there, now? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Which makes me wonder why people don't use UTC dates for build versions... It's much easier to determine if you have an updated version if you look at the version 2007.03.23 and can tell it's from today. You can compare your video card drivers to the OS and say, hey, these are both 2007.02 builds. Maybe there's an update! (Clicks "Check for Update" button) You can then put a B or X in front of the version to signify Beta or eXperimental build and require a EULA of sorts if the user decided to try these builds. If you need more visibility on versions, use extended version and add on the UTC time in hh.MM.ss format.

      Everyone knows how to read time (at least I hope they do) and formatting it to a version format really wouldn't be that hard to read. The hardest part is determining when the source is tagged with that build revision. You can't do it on compile since some people prefer to "roll their own."

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:Isn't there, now? by miro+f · · Score: 1

      2000/XP/Vista are the official Windows release names, not code names

      NT5.0/NT5.1/NT6.0 are the names of the respective kernels. It's like calling ubuntu 7.04 "Linux 2.6.20"

      Windows 2000 didn't have a code name

      Windows XP was codenamed "Whistler"

      Windows Vista was codenamed "Longhorn"

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    3. Re: Isn't there, now? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      "Dapper Drake" and "Feisty Fawn" are also official release names. I called them "code names" partly because the GGP did, and partly because they are code names in the sense that they are a code for the real version number. On the other hand, 5.0/5.1/6.0 are not just the versions of the Windows kernels (for one thing, I'm no Windows expert, but I think there was very little kernel change between 5.0 and 5.1, at least little change that wasn't backported), which is quiet visible: Just run winver on XP, and it will say "Microsoft Windows Version 5.1". The "XP" name is only located in the logo at the top of the window. The "ver" command will mention XP, but it does say "Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.xxxx]", and I doubt it would just be reporting on the kernel version.

  32. This is a true story by 9gezegen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Two weeks ago, one of my friends called me. His in-laws were visiting them. Since they are Turkish, they will stay like 6 months with their daughter in US. In order to pass time, they often visit the local library to use internet and read Turkish newspapers.

    Now my friend found an old computer from his company (Pentium III, 750 Mhz, 20GB harddisk) that had Windows 2000 and thought that could save his in-laws a trip to the library. He connected it to his brand new cable connection (without any router). I had warned him earlier that he should at least install a firewall before connecting it to the internet. Of course he didn't listen me and it was the next day after the first run that he called me. Guess what, the computer started showing spam messages (I think that was the messanger bug), so he run an old antivirus program all day and couldn't find anything (the program never finished actually).

    Now, he was wondering how he can fix the problem. I said either use a free anti virus or let me install linux. Since he wanted to test drive Linux he opted for it. So we made a deal, his in-laws were going to prepare delicious Turkish food, and meanwhile I was going to install Kubuntu 6.10.

    At the beginning, the boot started fine. However, as soon as X11 started the screen went dark. I waited 15 minutes or so since that was the first time I was using Kubuntu 6.10 installer and I thought the machine was doing something. But it turned out that I had downloaded live cd (which had the installer). So spent an hour or so trying a few times, and trying install without going to the live system. I should have read little more, since apparently live cd doesn't have the regular installation options I was expecting to see (they had another CD for that). Anyway, after an hour or so, I had my euroka moment when I pressed Cltr-Alt-F1. Wholla, text console was there. Now, at least I knew machine was up but X11 had problems. So I changed X11 configuration on the live system to vesa and X started working. With the main bottleneck solved, I quickly started installation. The installer was kind enough to ask even if I want to create a partition for windows and let it stay there. My friend just said remove everything, so I just go and selected a few options and the machine was ready in 10 minutes or so. However, when it booted the next time from the hard-drive, it was again X11 with problems so I just modified xconfig file to switch it back to vesa driver. Now, I had a working machine with 800x600 resolution. A quick internet search showed me that the Matrox G250 driver that comes with the driver had a bug. So ubuntu forums had a discussion where somebody recompiled bug-free debian driver for matrox. After installing that, I had 1600x1200 resolution without any problem. Next hour spent on eye-candies. I installed firefox, created bookmarks to the Turkish newspapers, created some bookmarks to in-laws mail providers etc, added some weather and add blocking extensions. I also changed to KDE and Firefox themes to noia (to their dismay, since initially they wanted to have familiar XP interface which my heart didn't let me do it. I complained so much that they let me use Noia :)).

    Anyway, to make the long story short, the only think they wanted out-of box was Internet Explorer since some sites explicitly required it and Acrobat Reader. It didn't took very long to install IE (thanks to IEs4Linux) and Adobe already had acroread ready. My friend's wife needed an office program, so the obvious choice was OpenOffice. The final step was the installation of Flash. I also showed them how to use Adept so that they can install whatever they want very easily, and just added a button to kill firefox or IE , in case they had problems.

    Since then they are very happy with their system. My main concern which was running KDE on Pentium 3 750Mhz machine with 256MB ram was unfounded. The system is very responsive. I was wondering how long it would stay without crashing, and asked them to let the compute

    1. Re:This is a true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      One of the options on the very first boot screen for the desktop CD is "Start Ubuntu in safe graphics mode", and it's intended for exactly this circumstance. This would have saved you manually hacking around with xorg.conf to get to a working desktop initially.

    2. Re:This is a true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the fucking dickhead had bothered to read the manual, let alone the SCREEN, he would have realized this.

  33. This will be awesome because... by purpleraison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just installed one of the betas on my old Toshiba Satellite laptop, and everything works perfectly for me. In fact an odd finding is that I get BETTER reception with my wi-fi card than when it was running Windows XP.

    My feelings on the current releases of Ubuntu is that it is getting VERY close to making Linux a potential alternative for average Windows users. The only shortcoming that still exists is that installing applications that are not distributed through Ubuntu is still confusing for 'normal' folks (ie. people who have no background with Linux). It would be nice if Linux would adapt a single universal installer for all Linux apps -- that would bring Linux a lot of people.

    Anyways, keep your eyes on this release -- it is nice :D

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
    1. Re:This will be awesome because... by Whitemage12380 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I think this is one of the most important tasks to be done.
      As it happens, I also have an old Toshiba Satellite laptop. Looks like I'll be upgrading tomorrow if I have time.

  34. Will my hardware work? by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

    Will I have hardware accelerated 3D video from my NVidia card without having to spend an hour doing Google searches for the proper procedure and drivers, and then spending another hour trying to find ones that actually, you know, WORK?

    If not, just stop. I don't care WHY not. I don't care about whining about the genetic licensing purity of an operating system. If it doesn't work, completely, out of the box, then this is of no use at all. OK, I'll even give it a pass on the "out of the box" thing and say this. It's gotta work with no more than 1 trip to NVidia.com to get the latest driver package. Which is all it takes to get working under Windows. I hold every operating system to that VERY LOW standard. It's a low bar to meet. Ubuntu has yet to meet it.

    Answers that contain the words "recomplile the kernel" and/or "recompile x11" are from people who really don't get my point.

    1. Re:Will my hardware work? by HighBit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firstly, restricted drivers have always been a part of ubuntu, and when those are installed, it should "just work"; if not, it is a bug. This is perhaps better than Windows, as you need no trip to nividia.com

      Secondly, yes, you can forego the restricted package, download the nvidia driver, and run the install script. This is what I do, and it always works without hassle. I just hit enter a few times and I'm done.

      But really it comes down to what you want to do. If you want to run Windows because it will "just work" and/or you can make it "just work" within your comfort zone, that's fine. If you want to run Linux because it will "just work" and/or you can make it "just work", that's also fine. Some people choose the first, some the second. The better choice is the one that makes you happiest, isn't it?

    2. Re:Will my hardware work? by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

      It's gotta work with no more than 1 trip to NVidia.com to get the latest driver package. Which is all it takes to get working under Windows. I hold every operating system to that VERY LOW standard. It's a low bar to meet. Ubuntu has yet to meet it.


      It's a good and fair standard - to be held against every hardware vendor, not the operating system. If nvidia doesn't make an effort to make it easier for a particular OS (I don't blame nvidia as they surely have their own legitimate reasons from business standpoint), there isn't much that OS can do, can it?
      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    3. Re:Will my hardware work? by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear it would be easier to buy weed if it weren't illegal.

    4. Re:Will my hardware work? by grcumb · · Score: 2, Informative

      If not, just stop. I don't care WHY not. I don't care about whining about the genetic licensing purity of an operating system. If it doesn't work, completely, out of the box, then this is of no use at all. OK, I'll even give it a pass on the "out of the box" thing and say this. It's gotta work with no more than 1 trip to NVidia.com to get the latest driver package. Which is all it takes to get working under Windows. I hold every operating system to that VERY LOW standard. It's a low bar to meet. Ubuntu has yet to meet it.

      Why are you complaining about Ubuntu when your complaint is with the hardware manufacturer? If you want a usable computer out of the box, then install the VESA driver and be content. But if that's not good enough, and you want all the state of the art features that modern graphics adapters support, then go to the people who write the drivers and demand it.

      You may not care WHY not, but you should at least take the time to understand that issues like this are not of Ubuntu's making. This is not about software purity; this is about the intransigence of the people who make the hardware. There are valid historical reasons for that intransigence, but until YOU start aiming your complaints at the people who can actually affect the situation, then you should stick to Windows.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    5. Re:Will my hardware work? by fforw · · Score: 1

      The steps needed to activate NVIDIA drivers with feisty alpha on my laptop were: start "System/Administration/Restricted Drivers Manager", enter my password and click to enable NVIDIA drivers..

      --
      while (!asleep()) sheep++
    6. Re:Will my hardware work? by miro+f · · Score: 1

      yup, enable desktop effects and it will download/install/setup the latest drivers for you automatically.

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    7. Re:Will my hardware work? by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      Will I have hardware accelerated 3D video from my NVidia card without having to spend an hour doing Google searches for the proper procedure and drivers, and then spending another hour trying to find ones that actually, you know, WORK?

      Yes. Got to the "System" menu -> "Preferences" -> "Desktop Effects". Click the "Enable desktop effects" button. If you would rather just install the proprietary Nvidia driver without enabling the desktop effect, install the nvidia-glx package using your choice of the "Add/Remove..." applet, or the Synaptic package manager.

      Answers that contain the words "recomplile the kernel" and/or "recompile x11" are from people who really don't get my point.

      You have not been paying much attention to Linux in the past few years, don't you ?

      --
      :wq
    8. Re:Will my hardware work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      System->Administration->Restricted Drivers Manager

      Check the "NVIDIA" box.

      Easy enough?

    9. Re:Will my hardware work? by brother+bloat · · Score: 1

      for ubuntu 6.10 or earlier:

      1.) open terminal
      2.) type "sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx" and press enter
      3.) press alt+ctrl+backspace to restart X

      for 7.04:

      1.) install ubuntu (nvidia drivers are included)

      enjoy!

      --
      (( (CRAYON) )) >
    10. Re:Will my hardware work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's gotta work with no more than 1 trip to NVidia.com to get the latest driver package. Which is all it takes to get working under Windows.

      I take it your experience with Windows is rather limited. Over the years I've had many computers, OS and graphics boards and hence many driver problems. I've had more problems with windows graphics drivers than X11 drivers. Moreover, if the vendor driver doesn't work in X11 you can always fall back to the open source driver. If you have problems with windows you can sometimes revert to using a VESA driver or try an old version of the driver from the vendor.

      Had any luck with graphics drivers under Vista? Nope, didn't think so.

    11. Re:Will my hardware work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what you're complaining about. Even in Ubuntu 6.06, it's easy to install the NVidia drivers. In Ubuntu 6.10, you can just apt-get install nvidia-glx linux-restricted-modules-generic and it's installed, or you can download the drivers from NVidia's web site and run them (sudo sh NVIDIA-blahblah.sh).

    12. Re:Will my hardware work? by ldj · · Score: 1

      1998 called, and they want their Linux complaints back.

      --
      Open Source: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.
    13. Re:Will my hardware work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are retarded. Np.

    14. Re:Will my hardware work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a fair no-nonsense question. When I first started using Ubuntu, I wanted to do it the "normal" way, that is, the long way. But after having learned the long way now I just want to get it done. So I use Automatrix to go out and download, and then set up my hardware acceleration for me (I'm using nvidia 6600gt). Then you can uninstall Automatrix if you want, I did. It takes two minutes to have Automatrix set up, and then it literally does *everything* for me. I don't know about your card, but this has been my experience. Fast, and "just works".

    15. Re:Will my hardware work? by Rutulian · · Score: 1

      Will I have hardware accelerated 3D video from my NVidia card without having to spend an hour doing Google searches for the proper procedure and drivers, and then spending another hour trying to find ones that actually, you know, WORK?

      Ummm...have you actually used a linux distro in the last three years? Every major distribution has packages for the nvidia drivers, and has had them for at least several years (some, like gentoo, even longer). If they aren't installed by default, they are usually trivial to install. You can use the nvidia installer on their website, but that is a lot harder to use and less likely to work the first time. Learn how to use your distributions package management software. Yes, that thing called learning...usually needed when you are trying out something new, like an entirely different operating system that does not and will not work exactly like Windows.

    16. Re:Will my hardware work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always try reading the Ubuntu Nvidia Binary Driver Howto

      There's also the ATI Binary Driver Howto, I used this howto and got my old Radeon 9600XT working in about 5 minutes.

    17. Re:Will my hardware work? by Vskye · · Score: 1

      He / She has a valid point, so mod the parent up!

      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
    18. Re:Will my hardware work? by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but having installed Windows and Linux multiple times, I find the many reboots involved in Windows to be more painful than the tweaks required to get the most out of a Linux distribution. Hell, a little extra configuration doesn't hurt so much, and people write scripts to automate that stage like EasyUbuntu or Automatix.

      Try having Linux on a secondary machine. My experience is that older, cheaper laptops - ones that have good Linux hardware support - really shine with Linux. Windows needs anti-virus and firewall software that is that much more burden on these machines, and the one area that Linux is really short on, that being the latest greatest games, aren't really going on that laptop anyway. My girlfriend's old Averatec 3300 recently got saved from being pitched when I plugged in a bootable USB flash drive with Ubuntu Edgy in and showed her around. It's now replaced the two-years-old Windows XP she had on there before and she's quite happy with it. I'm not even kidding!

    19. Re:Will my hardware work? by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      I did have it on my secondary machine.

      There were no obvious instructions for installing hardware.

      Sitting and rebooting while I do something else consumes no time at all. Actively having to search for "how do I get my video card to work under Ubuntu" takes time I could be doing something else with.

      After not being able to get it to work after working with it for about a month or so, I paid $99 for a copy of XP home.

      This was on the previous version ("stable") of Ubuntu.

    20. Re:Will my hardware work? by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu has exactly 0 value for me if my hardware doesn't work. I'm not complaining about Ubuntu any more than I'd complain about anything else really. If the Ubuntu folks want me to use their operating system, it has to work. Seems pretty straightforward.

      Honestly, I don't care who's fault it is. It works, or it doesn't. Or it can be made to work with a minimum of effort.

      Ubuntu either doesn't or can't. That's all I needed to know.

  35. ShipIT cds? by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    Since this is the next version of "LTS" does that mean we can get a free set of nice shiny *pressed* cds of this later this year?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:ShipIT cds? by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      7.04 is not an LTS release. I doubt 7.10 will be, either. My money is on 8.04

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:ShipIT cds? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Odd, i thought it said it was 'the next released to be LTS" on either the K or U wepage. Might have been a typo or i caught it out of context..

      Oh well, ill keep burning cdR's for a bit longer.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. Not worth it. by eddy · · Score: 1

    Why is it okay for Windows to "force people to chose something incompatible with other platforms"?

    The fact is that these on-board RAID solutions aren't worth it (even when there are vendor drivers available). Use them for the physical connectors and run linux software raid on them. This way you'll probably get better performance, and when you change motherboard, you won't lose access to your volume(s) (or have to find an addon-card with the same chip at the old MB, and waste money and likely a precious PCI-slot)

    The correct solution is probably to put the RAID on a dedicated server and use smb to access it from clients instead, and you can stop worrying about whether or not your fav. OS will support your data storage.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Not worth it. by postmortem · · Score: 1

      So I'm going to get better performance of my two drives by using Linux soft RAID in Vista and XP?

      Mobo RAID it is worth it, just hard-core Linux users don't get it. It is not anti-Linux or locked in Windows patform, as dmraid shows. IT is trendy, and all Linux distros will use it, sooner or later.

      Lately, even HP and DELL are selling home desktop computers with mobo RAID enabled and preconfigured.

      "The correct solution is probably to put the RAID on a dedicated server and use smb to access it from clients instead"

      You are missing the point. I said mobo RAID is free feature for home users that improves disk performance without cost or hassle.

    2. Re:Not worth it. by eddy · · Score: 1

      I've run 'mobo RAID' -- HPT-370 on a KT7A-RAID back in 2001, to be precise -- in a RAID-0 configuration for speedy game loading, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about here. It worked good and I had no need to access the data from linux since the games wouldn'r run there anyway, even though I believe it can be done (ie there are HPT raid-drivers). This is likely the case for most people who RAID for performance at home; it's going to be either for games or video-editing, both of which are typically 'locked' to one platform anyhow.

      If you have a problem with vendor support, I suggest you contact them and complain instead of ranting about "linux". There's not much that can be done when companies like Highpoint, Silicon Image and so on refuse to write free drivers or even give out specs. (SI was expecially bad for a while, until apparently they had a sudden change of heart)

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    3. Re:Not worth it. by postmortem · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, mobo RAID actually means RAID made by chipset manufacturers: that is Intel, NVIDIA, VIA, SIS, etc. Highpoint and Silicon Image are still there, but virtually any 2 yrs old motherboard already has onboard RAID from chipset.

      dmraid does pretty good job with all of them, it is just that some distros are still reserved towards it, and not ready yet to put it in the installer.

  37. Not that you shouldn't try Linux but...... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Have you ever checked out StyleXP for Windows XP?

    When I ran WinXP full time I used it to install a OS X/Aqua type theme.

    Now I use the Vista Transformation Pack to make XP look as much like Vista as is possible.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Not that you shouldn't try Linux but...... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess? It uses the same amount of CPU and Memory as Vista does too?

      Sorry but I'm still trying to figure out how Windows manages to make skins so bloaty while Linux makes them light and far better.

    2. Re:Not that you shouldn't try Linux but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. KDE and Gnome are such bloated POS's, that you don't even notice the performance hit by using a theme.

    3. Re:Not that you shouldn't try Linux but...... by Idaho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you ever checked out StyleXP for Windows XP?


      NOOOOO, not that spyware-infested piece of crap!

      Also, why would you even want to pay for such things when it should be part of the OS (whether the OS itself is for free or not).

      Another reason why I prefer Linux...at least in Linux you don't have to download adware/spyware-infested crap in order to do some simple theme or style changes in my desktop environment.
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    4. Re:Not that you shouldn't try Linux but...... by Nemetroid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you can patch XP's theme managing file (uxtheme). It isn't bundled with the OS, but all the patcher does is remove the barrier that says only MS certified themes can be used. Sure, it's nowhere near the versatility of Gnome (or KDE I presume), but you aren't restricted to the themes Windows comes with.

    5. Re:Not that you shouldn't try Linux but...... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      It never gave me any problems with spyware.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  38. Secret Roadmap for Future Ubuntu Release Names by autophile · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Giggly Gnu
    Happy Hamster
    Icy Ichthyosaur
    Jumping Jehosaphat
    Killer Klown (from outer space)
    Lame Liger
    Manly Man (Mugabe Memorial edition)
    Numb Nut
    Oppresive Opposum
    Permissive Penguin
    Quaaludinous Quail
    Raw-throated Rhinovirus
    Submissive Sasquatch
    Tasty Tuna on Rye with Lettuce and Tomato, Soda, and Side of Fries
    Unpredicable Unexpected Cotton Rat (really, look it up)
    Valorous Vampire Bat
    Wet Weasel
    Xenu's Xliii
    Yawny Yeti
    Zootropic Zygophyllacea Scale

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:Secret Roadmap for Future Ubuntu Release Names by Nushio · · Score: 1

      I thought the last one was Zombie Zebra.

      --
      Check out Unsealed: Whispers of Wisdom! http://unsealed.k3rnel.net It's an action-RPG about Open Sourcerers.
  39. yup, working hardware is crucial by A1miras · · Score: 1

    If not, just stop. I don't care WHY not. I don't care about whining about the genetic licensing purity of an operating system. If it doesn't work, completely, out of the box, then this is of no use at all. OK, I'll even give it a pass on the "out of the box" thing and say this. It's gotta work with no more than 1 trip to NVidia.com to get the latest driver package. I call bullshit. I've installed both windows and ubuntu on my current computer, a two year old Dell. Ubuntu did not require a download to display at the full resolution I needed and to get the binary driver I didn't have to go find some random manufacturer's site on the internet, I just did it through an application that came with my OS. As for windows? Started up at 640x480, and, get this, DIDN'T HAVE DRIVERS FOR MY ETHERNET CARD. Microsoft is really going to have to work on this shit if they're going to make any progress in the desktop arena. If they can't get this right, just stop, I don't want to here your whiny MS-zealot crap, I don't have time for it.
    --
    Take Care

    A1miras
    1. Re:yup, working hardware is crucial by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As for windows? Started up at 640x480, and, get this, DIDN'T HAVE DRIVERS FOR MY ETHERNET CARD. Microsoft is really going to have to work on this shit if they're going to make any progress in the desktop arena. If they can't get this right, just stop, I don't want to here your whiny MS-zealot crap, I don't have time for it.

      Thank you. That's basically the whole story right there. If we're going to compare install experiences for operating systems, Ubuntu crushes Windows into the ground all day long.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  40. I don't get betas by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    from companies who have demonstrated that their quality control and testing SUCK.

    "Get it while it's hot!"

    And burn your installation when you do...

    No, thanks, I'll wait for the final release - and maybe the first few weeks - or months - of patches - from Kubuntu before I consider upgrading.

    And even then, I may "upgrade" back to Mandriva or openSUSE.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:I don't get betas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand the purpose of a beta, do you? This isn't a "preview" release where you can install it and expect everything to work just like the final version will. There are still lots of known bugs and issues, and they just want more people to use it so they can have more testing.

  41. Unfortunately ... by jopet · · Score: 1

    No decent support for a Hauppauge WinTV PVR-350 - none of the usual tv apps like kdetv, zapping, tvtime etc. work.

  42. What happened to the release named by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    "Caffinated Chameleon".

    I swear that release went by so fast I did not even see it!

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  43. pun intended? by b100dian · · Score: 1

    - The new migration tool recognises Internet Explorer bookmarks, FireFox favourites

    One spelling wrong, two menus swapped and a British writing of an "IT term"??

    --
    gtkaml.org
    1. Re:pun intended? by evilgrug · · Score: 1

      You'll find "recognises" is correct British English too.

  44. Will it be hard to upgrade to the Final release? by Mex · · Score: 1

    I'm itching to try this one, and I'm already downloading it!

    But please tell me: How hard will it be to upgrade to the final release if I install it to my hard drive?

    If it's going to be too hard, I think I'd rather wait.

  45. Congratulation to the maintainers! by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

    I've been using Feisty on my PS3 for about a month or two, and on my main desktop for about a week (after upgrading from dapper and edgy). I've used a half dozen other distros, but this one is truly friendly - about equivalent to Mandriva, IMHO, which I've been running for years as my Arcade cabinet/file/print-server.

    Beryl looks great, but it still needs more debugging, so it's no wonder they didn't enable it by default. The only real bug I've seen is related to it: where Yakuake occasionally causes X11 to restart when using Beryl.

    If anyone's been looking to give Linux a try, download the Live CD when the final release comes out (or at least wait a few weeks from now, after the hardcore Linux users have flushed out any more lingering beta-bugs). You have nothing to lose, and at the very least it's always good to have a second OS for testing when devices mysteriously stop working under Windows.

    1. Re:Congratulation to the maintainers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my PS3
      noez your karma will drop...
    2. Re:Congratulation to the maintainers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only real bug I've seen is related to it: where Yakuake occasionally causes X11 to restart when using Beryl.

      With a NVIDIA card? AFAIK it's a bug in the driver (at least, it doesn't happen with Xgl).
  46. Bug #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubuntu Hungry Hippo should be nice, but if you want to fix bug number #1 ( https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 ) and overthrough Microsoft, you'll have t to wait for:
    Ubuntu Cuthroat Cthulhu

    when all who are called throw down the "Linux for Humans" (whatever that means) facade and bow down to our new overlord.

  47. Re:Newbie Question ... mepis? by pbhj · · Score: 1

    I'm intrigued, I'm considering Kubuntu instead of Slackware (big leap I know).

    How is Mepis "much better [for KDE]"? I don't know anything about Mepis other than the name, I didn't even realise it was an Ubuntu derivative.

    Cheers

  48. Re:Will it be hard to upgrade to the Final release by FunWithKnives · · Score: 1

    It's never difficult to upgrade to a final release with Debian-based distros. Just issue 'sudo apt-get dist-upgrade' once it has been announced.

    --
    "We may face a scorched and lifeless earth, but they're accountable to their shareholders first."
  49. Features by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    You seem to be fairly knowledgeable about bugs and features in 7.04. Do you know (or does anyone else?) how tablet PC support has been evolving in Ubuntu lately? I haven't found a single distro that has good application support for tablets. The requisite input driver for xorg is there and usually works, but the apps are shite.

    What is desperately needed is something like Windows Journal. There is Xournal, Gournal and Jarnal, but all three have no "print PDF to journal" feature (which is really what makes this kind of application most useful) and I believe both of the first two have no typed text support. Jarnal is based on Java (ew) and, stereotypically, is desperately slow.

    I have a Toshiba Portege M205-S810 that has been begging me for some Linux lovin', but without application support it's rather worthless to run Linux on it.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The apps are shite? Well, why doesn't a * great critic * like yourself, who obviously is so full of himself (yet who lacks actual professional experience in this field) that he thinks he can do better, do some better ones then, from your own hands and mind? Oh I see: You can't, and lack the ability to do so apparently. That would mean putting yourself out there for what you dish out yourself, criticism, which I see from your latest posts you cant handle well at all when confronted by someone who has done decent work in this apk person. You talk a good game only, lol! Talk really is cheap you know. Actions and deeds speak far louder than words, but a dolt like yourself can't seem to realize that and how foolish you look putting out criticism of others work as you constantly do, yet you have done nothing yourself. Grow up. If you don't have something good to say, then do not, unless you are indeed, a professional reviewer or critic. Or, that you have at least done work of a similar calibre that others can judge you by. Not only did you get modded down -1 for this:

      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=227563&thre shold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=18435701

      You also took quite a beating at somebody's hands in that thread, when they stated you should show them something better you had created than this apk person you put down there. You could not and you have no idea apparently how idiotic you looked there you spoiled little brat. Grow up.

  50. Re:Will it be hard to upgrade to the Final release by cranos · · Score: 1

    Ummm you'd think so, but there were major issues with dist-upgrading from Dapper to Edgy with Ubuntu.

    It's now actively discouraged by the ubuntu devs to use dist-upgrade and instead you should use the updating tool in the GUI patch manager thing.

  51. Similar Story by tjasond · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the story, I have another one which is probably just one more of many other similar stories out there.

    I have a friend that was in the same situation; he knew nothing about computers, only needed to access email, surf the web, and edit Office documents. One day the hard drive on his laptop crashed, badly (boot partition got corrupted). Despite a lot of recovery attempts, it finally appeared that the disk was physically corrupted. Luckily for him, I had an old laptop laying around that I had replaced with a new one just a few months earlier. I offer to let him have the hard drive from it as a replacement if he'll let me run an experiment by installing Ubuntu for him to use since he has virtually no technical knowledge. He was actually a little curious, saying "you know, I've heard about this Linux stuff, go ahead and we'll give it a try." After all, in typical Dell fashion, he didn't have his XP installation media anyway.

    Well, I got Dapper installed, but my display was locked in at 800x600, which I found out on the forums* was due to:
    1) A required BIOS update
    2) An edit to xorg.conf (Surprise!)
    Upon correcting these issues, we were in business. One thing was for sure though - his 128 MB of RAM wasn't going to cut it (although the Celeron 1.2 Ghz was doing fine). So I plunked down $30 for a 256MB chip for him and the thing was super snappy, including wireless.

    I would ask him every so often how everything was going, and he would say that everything was great. After about 2 months I asked him, "Ok, so what do you really think about it?" and he replied, "well, it's kind of like shopping at Aldi's [a local discount market] - everything's kind of generic, but it's got everything you need". Then I laughed. Hard.

    So he's still using it to this day, and it's been at least 9 months now. Just the other day he was showing me that he had changed the desktop wallpaper to a funny picture of Borat :-)

    The experience definitely taught me to never underestimate the usability of a Linux system for a user with little to no technical knowledge (although having a geek friend helps).

    * Without the friendly and informative atmosphere of the forums, ubuntu would not be anywhere near the product that it is today. Good job guys. If only other internet forums could follow your example :-)

  52. Management Release by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    Once all the bugs have been worked out, we'll produce a version of Ubuntu with a name that'll be easier to sell to the Corporate Sector: "Pudgy Pinstriper"

  53. come on, have some perspective by nanosquid · · Score: 1

    He got the hang of things for a while, but then he interrupted a dpkg process when Synaptic was running by hitting the power button [...] The problem with these kinds of things is that if even one little glitch happens like this, the user gets stuck and then usually gives up and goes back to Windows.

    Microsoft Windows also wedges when you hit the power button at the wrong point during an upgrade or install. In fact, Microsoft Windows wedges and messes up its configuration sooner or later even when you don't.

    So, yes, Synaptic should recognize this case and handle it automatically. No, it's not a showstopper; it happens rarely enough and it's easy to fix.

    Did you file a bug report?

  54. Release Name is the Numbers by MrFlannel · · Score: 1

    7.04 is this release name (as were 6.10 and 6.06).
    And, yes, that's "six point ten" not "six one oh", it's Year.Month (and there have been a few discussions on changing it to a dash, or a slash, to prevent confusion, like truncation as 6.1).

    Anyway, Those are the REAL names of the releases. Feisty Fawn is just a codename while under development, and only lives on upon release with the repository name. You won't see "Feisty Fawn" anywhere, you'll see "7.04", with 'feisty' when you lsb_release and when you manually edit/browse repositories.

    --
    Clones are people two.
  55. Re:Will it be hard to upgrade to the Final release by MrFlannel · · Score: 1

    dist upgrade isn't recommended because update-manager does it, and some extra stuff (makes sure some metapackages are installed and stuff).

    But, in the case of this question, once you've installed 7.04, upgrading to the final release will be identical to upgrading when a new version of a package comes out. update-manager will take care of it.

    --
    Clones are people two.
  56. excellent learning tool by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
    He was immediately stuck. He even figured out how to access the shell, but he didn't understand why it kept saying that he needed superuser privileges to continue.

    And yet he understood what superuser priviledges were to run Synaptic in the first place ?
    This whole situation is what I call "a good mistake". Why ?.. because you have hopefuly taught him the advantages and disadvantages of running as a superuser. I am sure that he now understands the concept of the only way you can truely screw up your Linux system. And surely you have told him why root access is necessary to change things like system settings. So although maybe it was a frightful (but repairable) mistake... good things were learned right ?

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  57. Ready for the general public? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubuntu 6.06 sure hasn't given me any problems I couldn't fix. Installation was a breeze. Essentially all my hardware was detected (except a USB modem, which didn't work for some reason -- so big deal, I swapped it out for an external serial modem and that worked fine). Setup was trivial. The system came right up.

    I've had no trouble at all customizing Ubuntu to look like OS X, downloading ahost of great free software like Xara Extreme, and doing DTP via Scribus and graphics with GIMP and Xara.

    Sure, I nuked Synaptic by putting in a bad repository. So I just did sudo nano and edited the /conf file and everything came right back. It was no trouble at all.

    The thing that impresses me about linux is that all the configuration and other files are plain text. If you put in a wrong setting, you can go right in with a text editor and fix it. Try that with the Windows registry.

    Now I've moved on to converting rpm packages to .debs using alien. Works great. Every once in a while I download an rpm that's missing some dependencies, so I just find those libs and add 'em and everything works fine.

    Really, Ubuntu is a lot easier than I expected, and I just haven't had any significant problems installing or using it. Best of all, my Ubutu system comes up about 3 minutes faster than my Windows system because I don't have to waste all that time loading antivirus and firewalls and antispyware and blah blah blah.

    Ubuntu just works.

  58. Painful? by matt+me · · Score: 1

    Painful? What, you had to run apt to clear up some packages? :p Most people's problems could be avoided if they removed all the ad-hoc incompatible backports they've downloaded (of Firefox or openoffice.org, as so many posts on ubuntuforums irresponsibly encourage users to do) and binary drivers which no-one should be using.

    I upgraded between Fedora Core releases using CD images I burnt, but I stupidly hadn't bothered to check them, and the later ones turned out to be corrupt, and the install went SMEF. Don't panic, I thought I was for it. Heehee, no. The computer booted (admittedly X wouldn't start), and yum was able to finish the install over the net. The only painful bit was making toast while yum performed Floyd's algorithm on the dependancies.

    Painful installs only occur at night, anyway.

    Don't encourage fresh installs over upgrades, otherwise they might as well install a fresh copy of Windows.

  59. Re:Will it be hard to upgrade to the Final release by cranos · · Score: 1

    See the problem with this approach is it doesn't deal with those who are running sans desktop.

    dist-upgrade has always been a valid tool and the fact that its broken in the later editions of Ubuntu is something that needs to be seriously looked at.

  60. Oh NO! by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    ALL the ACs on Slashdot are swarming around me since I starting making fun of that fool Alec Kowalski! I SHOULD REPUDIATE EVERYTHING I SAID IMMEDIATELY!

    Wait... hold on. Look at the way "they" write... hey, wait a second. They're all the same person! This guy is trying to make it look like the whole internet is after me by stalking my Slashdot userpage!

    WOW! WHAT A COMPLETE LOSER! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Oh NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only loser here is yourself starkruzr. The sad part is that for you, you look like an idiot in the doing of it. You put down others, and seem to get some sort of perverted joy out of causing trouble for others and yourself. If you want to do that though, a suggestion may be that you had better be able to show you had done equal quality or better work yourself first. It is really quite simple to understand.

  61. I find it fascinating by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    that there has yet to be one single post by a logged-in user in support of you.

    Now, I'm sure that now that I've said this, you'll create a sockpuppet, but that'll be easy to spot as it will have an extremely high UID.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:I find it fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=227475&cid=184 94155

      Are you a woman or a man starkruzr? Or is that just another lie of yours?? If you are a man, you are one of those little nerds who couldn't accomplish anything with his wasted life, that much we have established, lol!

      1.) You put down the people at myspace and called them lazy

      2.) You tried to put down apk's work here (which I tried and it is good quality software which even works on VISTA perfectly unlike other registry cleaning programs):

      http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/389/foowhatev ermakesgooglehappy.html

      (And, yet starLOSER, you had nothing to show that you did yourself of as good or better quality).

      ROTFLMAO!

      If you are a woman like you said in that first url link above? I recall you told us all you had a girlfriend you just lost (who could blame her with a jerk like you), and that makes you a twisted freak of nature as a lesbian: A genetic error, an aberration, lol!

      Either way? You can't win, not in this life. After all, either way, you're a freak, a loser, and a cowardly piece of crap that talks behind others' backs, and wastes your own time bothering others online instead of doing something useful.

      Doesn't matter though. You're SO simple to take down with your lousy logic, I actually feel sorry for you in a way, because your mind is probably a mass of conflicting impulses being a man's mind trapped in a woman's body... lol!

      Most folks call people like that windbags, perverted freaks, and judging by your screwed up behaviour bothering others for no reason online, miserable losers.

      I agree, you are each of those "twisto".

  62. Re:I find it fascinating START RUNNING LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is going to get posted from now on, in ALL of your posts, StarKruzr: You are busted in your lies.

    You have this coming from me (pulling an anonymous luser deal on your like you have to so many others you lying dishonourable coward):

    StarKruzr is from Staten Island NY, and this is him (Somebody ought to hunt his ass down and beat him good, he needs it):

    http://gallery.r3v3ng.net/albums/BoardyPhotos/jare tt_katey_maria.jpg

    StarLOSER is a liar, like usual, and you caught him yet again as I did before online in that much. StarKruzr said he was a woman here:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=227475&cid=184 94155 [slashdot.org]

    And, he is not a woman. ROTFLMAO, but surely he isn't much of a man either. Look at that flabby little dweeb!

    (No wonder he is pissed @ apk. Anybody that looks like this little flimsy freak will never get laid, not by pretty women @ least. Look @ those hounds he is with, lol!)

    StarLOSER also looks a lot younger than grad school age, which he claims to be in, more b.s. on his part, just like his lies he is caught in now above. This grad school status he has been saying here on slashdot for years now (longer than grad school is lol no less) is yet another lie on his part, just as he said he was a woman earlier in the url's above. StarLOSER (lol, good name for him) is doomed to a life of lies. So much for his credibility right? One lie, after another. Yet another he is caught in is this saying he is a woman. What a loser and liar.

    StarLOSER has some problems with attacking apk constantly on this board, and here is why (he got his tail beat in by him 2x now, and starloser did attack apk first):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161862&thresho ld=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=13532123

    &

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=227563&cid=184 68441

    StarLOSER apparently can't handle getting his ass beat in, when he starts up troubles for himself. StarLOSER is a typical little nerd loser who hides behind his keyboard online and talks tuff.

    If you read those posts from the url's above? You will see StarLOSER was asked what he had done of note in this field since he cuts others down. StarLOSER, the alleged grad student in this field (bullshit) couldn't put out a thing. ROTFLMAO!

    I would not say that is bad ordinarily, but if you're going to attack people that are known as good in this field as apk is, you had better have done better yourself. StarLOSER will never learn.

    I put this up for anyone's reference (especially apk if it was you to use against him because he is like this everywhere he goes), so he gets run out of town in shame here for his lies.

  63. Honestly, APK by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    "Run out of town in shame?"

    What do you think this is? Deadwood? This is the internets, you silly little twit. None of this actually MATTERS -- which is the point you completely failed to understand when you took the bait in the first place.

    YOU will never learn, I think. You'll be sitting in your rocking chair at the age of 80 and shaking your fist at your computer whenever someone tells you off on some forum somewhere. What a completely pathetic image.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Honestly, APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! You, of all people, have NO right to say that word, "honestly", especially you yet another arstechnica lying loser caught in the act, lying, lol! AND, you are running yourself out of town, not I.

      And, you'll be sitting around in your anonymity as an unknown nobody, in a grave far before the age of 80!

      (Because dishonest little lying pricks like you end up in the grave fast. Especially in NYC. I know, I lived there.)

      Only a matter of time for you, unless you shape up, which is doubtful. Once a weasel, always a weasel. Weasels like you dies a 1,000 deaths on the way, cowardly lion. You probably are a snide little backstabber in the real world, and keep your mouth shut. Look at your picture, for Pete's sake, lol!

      E.G. #1: StarKruzr said he was a woman here:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=227475&cid=184 94155

      StarKruzr is not a woman though (but sure is a liar, another Jeremy Reimer/Jay Little style liar, lol, & like they, got his ass beat in thru his own dishonesties) and is from Staten Island NY, and this is him:

      http://gallery.r3v3ng.net/albums/BoardyPhotos/jare tt_katey_maria.jpg

      ROTFLMAO, but surely he isn't much of a man either. Look at that flabby little dweeb!

      (No wonder he is pissed @ apk. Anybody that looks like this little flimsy freak will never get laid, not by pretty women @ least. Look @ those hounds he is with, lol!)

      Yes, yet another arstechnica liar, lol, another arstechnica weasel liar caught in the act again, ROTFLMAO! Why? Too stupid. Most arstechnicans are.

      Thanks again for this evidence of that, how scumbag'ish arstechnica people are.

      E.G. #2: Jeremy Reimer (your "hero" who has no degree in comp. sci., not even an A+ lol, let alone an MCSE & no professional experience in this field either, & yet you think he is an expert? LOL! You ARE a fool, aren't you!)

      At BEST, he makes $100 per 'article', & I earn that in 1 hour, each day! Then again, I actuall possess degrees and decades of experience in this field.

      Arstechnica are ambulance chasers that spit back what they read from others is all, derivative DRIVEL, everytime, & just recently here on slashdot no less they reposted what was on ExtremeTech a year ago regarding IBM using channels on their cpu's to cool them, no less as evidence of THAT? See here -> http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22819 7&cid=18490479 )

      Reimer lied about impersonating apk on his crappy OSY forums! He admitted it after being caught, lol. This is your hero? Figures: Scum gravitates to scum.

      Jeremy Reimer, like a child & not a 36 yr. old man, just ended up doing even MORE childish things like writing a libellous tune about apk, dumb move, grounds for lawsuit, and also edited photos about him, but as far as technical knowledge?

      See the url from Windows IT Pro mag below.

      E.G. #3: Jay Little his pal the great technical expert (not) got blown away by APK as well, on what he said he was an 'expert' in no less, in Exchange Server. What a pair of dumbos. The evidence is in the Windows IT Pro url below in fact. lol...

      http://www.windowsitpro.com/articles/index.cfm?art icleid=41095&cpage=190#feedbackAnchor

      Arstechnica: HOUSE OF LOSERS & LIARS ONLINE, rotflmao! Arstechnica, always losing to apk, everytime. It gets their goats badly, lol, but if they had any sense? They would stop already, but you see "StarLOSER" there, another arstechnica worm, at it again, and thanks (emailing this apk's way now in fact, lol).

      Plus, EVERYONE @ slashdot will know now too, every time you post foo